aie
ei
SOO AA ey er Quek ey PU ere eee ie
'
} prea ecM
: 7 era wat $ gi eee! fa H
: iyie Mees et PRT Pata ay
Ee i poh
4 ;
ate tek
had £9 M
4 :
Pampa zer ee reye 23 bok te te $
nt au efit shyh gape ;
EGS
Bed:
a Fy ee
nat
fet
sertete
2
eto
sit ga
yp hee naet
ibaa
PAS om *\, a!
4 variety eaate
itd tebe
'
rit re
Clelulatael
Piaee baat
a)
i
“
bers
vet
hat 9)
pares
Ret'd td:
Soimed
Date Ret'd:
foc 6 42. |
a
PROCEEDINGS
OF THE
ACADEMY OF NATURAL SCIENCES
PHILADELPHIA.
COMMITTEE OF PUBLICATION:
JosEpH Lerpy, M. D., Gero. H. Horn, M. D.,
Epw. J. Nouan, M. D., THomAs MEEHAN,
JOHN H. REDFIELD.
EpiIToR: EDWARD J. NOLAN, M.D.
PHILADELPHIA:
ACADEMY OF NATURAL SCIENCES,
LOGAN SQUARE,
1888.
ACADEMY OF NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA
February 14, 1888.
I hereby certify that copies of the Proceedings for 1887 have been presented
at the meetings of the Academy as follows :—
Pages Q9ito 24 . : . February 22, 1887.
6 Dito) 40s . . . March 1, 1887.
Oe AUN toy (Fa) . May 31, 1887.
ss Oi LOW nen ee : : Sune 14, 1887.
a fotoul 2 (ae ‘ : . July 5, 1887.
PAL Tio) URI. ; : . August 2, 1887.
be BSP tw) iets} : : . August 16, 1887.
« 169 to 184 . sgt . August “sORISSie
cP Santo 26
%17 to 248
249 to 264
265 to 296
297 to 312
813 to 328
329 to 360
361 to 376
September 6, 1887.
October 4, 1887.
October 18, 1887.
November 1, 1887.
December 13, 1887.
December 20, 1887.
January 17, 1888.
January 24, 1888.
Pe avi(ioas ese . January 381, 1888.
«<) 393: to 424). : : . February 7, 1888.
EDWARD J. NOLAN,
Recording Secretary.
PHILADELPHIA:
HORACE BINDER, PRINTER.
LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS.
With reference to the several articles contributed by each.
For Verbal Communications see General Index.
PAGE
Allen, Harrison, M. D. A prodrome of a Memoir on animal locomotion..... 60
Chapman, Henry C., M. D. Notes on the Anatomy of Salpa. Plates XIV,
Ok Wegnbdioao aaah asbnadeeds ACRE CCC RD ROG UASANSOUD Bea HSoUAT ene DOLERCB-aEnUsema coocesocason 334
Dolley, Chas. S..M.D. On the histology of Salpa. Plate XIII............... 298
Eigenmann, Carl H. Notes on the specific names of certain North American
ENGI SS Me Mee ae eco cere cceb si iascades poi eanincn sen Nous seiicslaceen dasmeoemsanteders 295
Fielde, Adele M. Notes on the fresh-water Rhizopods of Swatow, China.... 122
Garrett, Andrew. The terrestrial Mollusca inhabiting the Samoa or Navigator
LISTEN Si sageequanadbinosde. coop bonane bbbdyesdbenduAdon Sannd 5 codoriagubsapocc cosanseresdonge 124
Heilprin, Angelo. The classification of Post-Cretaceous deposits......... .... 314
The Miocene Mollusca of the State of New Jersey...........sceeseeeersseveee 397
Jordan, David Starr. Description of two new species of Fishes from South
PATEL CAME tere cct cet dan sdouas feispine eceiseies Holaticeaceaac ack eosiuactiecinn neeeennee’ 387
NoreroneAtcbinusmhoxentala.-qesnaacssisstescsssescemesscceaseesceew eae: eesbaieetnne ss 389
Koenig, George A., Ph. D. On Zinc-Mangenese Asbestos..............2:0000e0+ 47
Leidy, Jos. M. D. Notice of some parasitic WOrmMS............cee00 +0 os SEdcuon 20
McCook, Rev. Henry C. Prolonged life of invertebrates: Notes on the age
anduhabitsottherAmerican arantWlarpesscssscrcesse<. serach one esschasence 369
Meehan, Thomas. Contributions to the Jife-histories of plants...........:.00000+ 323
Meyer, Otto. On invertebrates from the Eocene of Mississippi and Alabama.
IPlefra) UU is ache sorgenancca.sodaooulsoos qacdicaaaadcanicoo subsoc 6 OCHS ocr ot apneanCaeande 51
Osborn, Dr. Henry F. On the structure and classification of the Mesozoic
RViAMMNAl lata vess ve boar seteameeeeccedss Mec smadesenecedeeuesmads Kode acees cat cieese 282
Poxtenwuhos. ©. A list ofithe Camees of Pennsylvaniaaessec\ncccccacersovense vies 68
Potts, Edward. Contributions towards a synopsis of the American forms of
fresh-water Sponges with descriptions of those named by other authors
and from all parts of the world. Plates V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, XI,
PXGI Pr omaneaa see tea ncsacssepwetoisupancen soeiteWeraecdondeecansancicl-lscisa(nsce send temas 158
Rominger, Dr. C. Description of a new form of Hydrozoa................+++ 11
Description of primordial fossils from Mount Stephens, N. W. Territory
Pigeamna da late Medesacre asic seep sien cecessndecenactuece cnseronsecsedeccesper sos 12
Ryder, John A. On the homologies and early history of the limbs of verte-
PALES dates eat Encse oes erage Aca punnes Lave ntaapcocisndeapene losscietends yas kokebabegex 344
Wachsmuth, Charles and Frank Springer. The summit plates of Blastoids,
Crinoids and Cystids, and their morphological relations. Plate IV.....
White, Dr. Charles A. On new generic forms of Cretaceous Mollusca and
their relation to other forms. Plate TV. ... 20.02. 1. icseceenesecoamelcemeeeeaee
On the Cretaceous Mollusca of Texas and their relation to those of other
portions of North America........ .--sssssccseonssncessnsnscsesscanenss uspnsien
82
PROCHE DINGS
OF THE
ACADEMY OF NATURAL SCIENCES
OF
PHILADELPHIA.
1887,
JANUARY 4, 1887.
Mr. THomas MrxEuAn, Vice-President, in the chair.
Fifteen persons present.
A New Species of Catfish (Ictalurus)—Prof. ANGELO HEILPRIN
described a species of catfish from Lake Okeechobee, Florida,
which differed in several well-marked characters from the various
other North American species that had hitherto been described.
The species is most nearly related to IJctalwrus lacustris, the
“catfish of the lakes,’ which it generally resembles. The color
over the greater part of the body is blue-black, varying to black
on the back, and white on the ventral surface; the barbels of one
of the inferior pairs are white, and nearly so in the second pair,
The dorsal fin is situated nearer to the adipose fin than to the
snout; humeral process moderately long, about one-half the
length of the pectoral spine; tail deeply forked, the upper lobe
barely longer than the lower one. Length of largest specimen
caught, about 20 inches. It was proposed to name this species
Ictalurus Okeechobeensis.
2
10 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
JANUARY 11.
The President, Dr. Jos. Lerpy, in the chair.
Eighteen persons present.
Papers under the following titles were presented for publication :
“Description of a new form of Bryozoa,” by Dr. C. Rominger ;
“ Notice of some Parasitic Worms,” by Jos. Leidy, M. D.
JANUARY 18.
Mr. Jonn H. ReEpFIexp, in the chair.
Fourteen persons present.
A paper entitled “On new Generic Forms of Cretaceous Mol-
lusca and their relation to other forms,” by Dr. C. A. White, was
presented for publication.
The following were ordered to be printed :—
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 11
DESCRIPTION OF A NEW FORM OF BRYOZOA.
BY DR. C. ROMINGER.
Patellipora stellata. PI. I, fig. 10.
Saucer-shaped colonies attached to foreign bodies by a short,
stout root-like stem. Under surface of colony covered by a
dense, smooth epithecal crust. From the centre of the concave,
terminal, discoid expansion diverge from 8 to 10 rounded, stout
radial crests or bars, which, towards the margin of the disk,
dilate wedge-like. Intervening between these radii are deep
furrows, likewise dilating toward the margin. The outer half of
each of these wedge-like bars is again divided into two branches
by a furrow entering them from the margin and running into a
point about half way from the centre. The surface of these
forked radial bars is covered with from 3 to 4 longitudinal
rows of small, round orifices, which make them resemble the
poriferous side of a fenestelloid stem. These orifices dilate in
the interior into flask-like cell-bags, which can be observed closely
packed together, on the underside of the bars, if by accidental
wearing the epithecal coating of the underside has been removed.
This peculiar Bryozoa was discovered by me in some drift-
boulders at Ann Arbor, associated with characteristic corniferous
limestone fossils, in silicified condition. Only three of them
were found by me; the most perfect and largest one of them is
represented in the figure.
12 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
DESCRIPTION OF PRIMORDIAL FOSSILS FROM MOUNT STEPHENS,
N. W. TERRITORY OF CANADA.
BY DR. C. ROMINGER.
My friend, Mr. Otto Klotz, in charge of the Astronomical
work of the Canada Dominion, while engaged with geodetic
measurements accidentally discovered this very interesting
locality, which furnishes an abundance of well-preserved primor-
dial fossils, particularly Trilobites, imbedded within a dark gray
slate rock, of about 300 or 400 feet in thickness. Above the slate
succeeds a large series of dolomitic rock beds, and below a very
large belt of quartzites crops out; although the immediate contact
of the quartzite with the slate is not seen in the locality. The
specimens collected on this spot Mr. Klotz had the kindness to
send to me. He gave others to the University of Michigan, his
Alma Mater. Many of these fossils are remarkably well pre-
served, and nearly all of them are believed to be undescribed
forms.
I have also to acknowledge here the liberality of Prof. A.
Winchell, who allowed me the use of the specimens sent to the
University. Among the collected fossils the most frequent form
is an Ogygia, which, in honor of its discoverer, I propose to name
Ogygia Klotzi. Pl. I, fig. 1.
More than a dozen perfect specimens of it are on hand, the
largest one of which measures 11 centimetres in length, by a
width of 6 centimetres; others are smaller in all gradations down
to a length of only 16 millimetres. One specimen, which is other-
wise not perfect, has the head complete, with attached movable
cheeks; in all the others the movable cheeks are missing.
The lat expanded specimens have suffered a degree of com-
pression, as usually occurs with fossils preserved in a slate rock.
In a general way the longitudinal diameters of the head, the
thorax, and the pygidium are equal, but the latter is usually
somewhat longer than either of the other body-divisions. The
glabella is large, reaching almost the front margin, which projects
as an elevated narrow rim.
The convexity of the glabella is only moderate, and the lateral
furrows on it, three in number, are very shallow, often scarcely
perceptible. Its sides are almost parallel, only slightly bulging
Proc Acad. Nat. Sci. Philada. 1887 Pavesi
C.Rominger, del.
Rominger, fossils from Mt. Stephens. & c.
£66 US) » i
pate sis
ath |
duh =
vt
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 13
out near the centre; width of the glabella measured across the
upper edge of the palpebral rim is 4 of the entire diameter of the
head at this place. Fixed cheeks are rather broad, the reniform
palpebral lobe is margined by a projecting rim, which rim is seen
continued under the form of a low rounded ruga extending from
the upper angle of the eyes obliquely inward and upward, so as
to meet the glabella at the third anterior lateral furrow of it.
The occipital furrow and its lateral continuation across the
cheeks is well marked. The movable cheeks terminate backward
in a long spine reaching down to the third thoracic segment.
The facial suture line terminates posteriorly near the genal
angles, anteriorly it intersects the margin on both sides of the
glabella, quite a distance off from it, about perpendicular above
the eye rim.
Thoracic segments in all the specimens, small or large, eight.
The gently curved scabre-like ribs abruptly taper backward into
a short spinose apex. Their centre bears a rounded broad depres-
sion, somewhat diagonal to the axis of the rib, and bordered on
both sides by a projecting rounded ruga of which the anterior is
more conspicuous than the posterior. The rachis is moderately
convex, gently tapering backward; its width, compared with the
length of the ribs, is as one and one-half to two in proportion-
The pygidium, as above stated, exceeds the head or thorax
slightly in length; it bears in the larger specimens eleven well-
marked annulations, flanked by as many costal expansions which
dilate considerably toward the margin, and bear in place of the
central depression of the free ribs a rounded central ruga bordered
on each side by a furrow; the edges of the anchylosed ribs are
likewise indicated by an elevated rim.
The curvature of the pygidial ribs is much stronger than on
the thorax, and their position to the rachis is more oblique, grad-
ually increasing backwards, so that the hinder ribs of the pygidium
meet the rachis under an acute angle. The edge of the pygidium
is formed by a smooth convex rim, against which the costal rugze
abut. ;
In the figured specimen the movable cheeks were missing, and
have been restored from another specimen with the head perfect.
Ogygia serrata. nov.sp PI. I, figs. 2, 2a.
There are four complete specimens in the collection, besides
numerous fragmental ones; nearly all are about equal in size; the
14 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
figured specimen is seven centimetres long, and five centimetres
wide, measuring from one genal spine to the other.
Head, thorax, and pygidium of equal length.
General form of the head and course of the facial sutures cor-
respond almost completely with the previously described species.
The glabella of this form is somewhat broader and more promi-
nent than in the former; also the glabellar furrows are more
distinctly marked; they are three in number, the hinder one is
the largest, directed obliquely inward and backward, but not
reaching to the centre of the glabella.
The palpebral rim and the rugosity continued from it upward
across the fixed cheeks are the same as in the former species.
The movable cheeks are protracted into long slender spines,
which reach as far down as the fifth thoracic rib.
Rachis broad, almost equal in diameter with the length of the
corresponding ribs, deducting their spiniform prolongations.
The occipital ring terminates with a triangular monticulose prom-
inence, overlapping the first thoracic ring, and likewise each one
of all these annuli of the thorax, and the pygidium bears a
strong spine on the median line.
The thorax of this species is, in all the specimens examined,
composed of only seven segments.
The pygidium has five annulations with as many ribs corre-
sponding to them. These ribs dilate considerably toward the
margin, as in the former; but while in that, a smooth ronnded rim
edges the pygidium, in this form the principal ruga of each rib
extends beyond the margin of the pygidium under the form of a
strong acute spine, directed backward, so as to be almost parallel
with the axis of the body. Five of such spines fringe each side
of the pygidium; their size is gradually diminished toward the
posterior end,
The hypostoma is in most of the specimens preserved, occupy-
ing its natural position. The shape is represented by one of the
annexed figures and needs therefore no further verbal description.
Many loose, but much smaller hypostomas, of which I likewise
figure a few (PI. I, figs. 2b and 2c), were found scattered through
the slate rock; to which of the associated trilobitic forms they
belong, I was unable to ascertain.
Two other forms of Trilobites occur with the just described
Ogygias, which in the configuration of their heads and in the
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 15
course of the facial suture lines fully correspond with them, but
they differ by the much smaller size of their pygidia in compari-
son with the size of the concerned thoracic divisions and the
heads. A further difference is in the number of thoracic segments,
which in them is nine instead of eight, and seven, as in the two
first described typical forms of Ogygia.
The glabella of the latter also shows three lateral furrows, while
in the two forms to be described, four very well marked glabellar
furrows are observable.
These differences and principally the difference in the proportion
of the size of head, thorax and pygidium, appear to me sufficient
to distinguish these forms from the genus Ogygia, and I propose
to apply to them the generic name Embolimus.
Embolimus spinosa, nov.sp. PI. I, fig. 3.
Only one, almost perfect specimen of this form is in the collec-
tion, but the number of fragmental specimens observable in the
slabs prove that this is not a rare species.
The specimen figured is 34 millimetres long; length of head 14
millimetres; length of thorax 15 millimetres; length of pygidium
5 millimetres, without counting the length of spinous processes.
The glabella is large, moderately convex, of equal width in all
its length, reaching close to the front margin, which is formed by
a narrow upturned rim.
The four glabellar furrows are well developed, none reaches the
centre of the glabella, the hinder ones are the largest, running
obliquely backward, the second and third furrows extend almost
at right angles from the margin of the glabella, but the apex of
the second is turned backward while the apex of the third furrow
is curved forward. The fourth and smallest furrow is directed
obliquely forward.
The occipital ring forms a triangular projection of the posterior
margin, which is crowned with a stout short spine, also each of
the thoracic annuli exhibits a faint indication of former orna-
mentation by a spine which is broken off in the specimen.
The pygidium has four sharp annulations with as many costal
appendages, which, a short distance off from the rachis, are ab-
ruptly bent backward, tapering into long spines projecting over
the pygidial margin in a direction parallel with the longitudinal
axis of the body.
16 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
Also the thoracic ribs terminate with long spines directed
obliquely backward. Each rib bears a deep depression in the
central part, which, commencing near the spinose peripheral end,
runs diagonally across the broader part of the ribs meeting the
rachis near the upper end of each annulation; but previous to that,
this depression sends off a side branch backward, which meets
the posterior part of the same annulus, leaving between the two
depressions a pointed triangular elevation in continuity with the
convex portion of the annuli; the edges of the ribs project as
elevated rounded rims, broadest in the middle, and tapering
toward the rachis and toward the periphery, where the anterior
rim is seen to constitute the body of the projecting spines.
Embolimus rotundata,nov.sp. Pl. I, figs. 4 and 5.
There is only one specimen in the collection which shows head,
thorax and pygidium in connection, but the movable cheeks are
missing. Other fragmentary specimens, however, exhibit the
head complete. The proportions in the size of the three partitions
of the body are:
Head, 13 millimetres; thorax, 14 millimetres; pygidium, 9
millimetres. Nine thoracic ribs, as in the former species; the
pygidium has six well-marked annulations and corresponding
pleural expansions, margin rounded, no spinose projections. The
thoracic ribs are similar in configuration with those of the pre-
ceding species, but they terminate rather abruptly with short
pointed ends.
The head likewise closely resembles the former species, with
the difference that the glabella expands considerably toward the
front end, while the glabella of the former is all its length of equal
width. The movable cheeks, observable in one of the specimens,
terminate backward in a long spine, reaching as far as the fourth
thoracic articulation. The two figures represent a fragment with
complete head and another incomplete specimen with the movable
cheeks missing.
Monocephalus Salteri? Billings. Pl. I, fig. 6.
I have, with some doubt, identified a small specimen found in
association with the others with the form described by Billings
under this name. The minuteness of the fossil, and its being
merely a cast without shell, prevents the observation of the more
delicate structural details, but the general appearance of Billings’
figure, as well as his description, are satisfactory proof to me that
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. ty
both fossils under consideration must be closely related, if not
identical.
The specimen, of which a figure is subjoined, has a total length
of 16 millimetres; length of head, 6 millimetres; length of thorax
with seven segments, also 6 millimetres; length of pygidium, 4
millimetres.
The head of the specimen, deprived of the movable cheeks,
bears a large glabella considerably dilating in front, with three
distinct lateral furrows. The thoracic ribs are deeply excavated
in the centre, and the adjoining margins of every rib project as
high ridges with a dividing line along the crest. The annuli
composing the pygidium are rather obsolete, but four sharp fur-
rows, spreading from each side of the rachis, indicate its compo-
sition of at least four anchylosed segments.
Conocephalites cordillere, nov. sp. PI. I, fig. 7.
Numerous specimens of this little trilobite occur in the collec-
tion; their average size in length is about 25 millimetres; the
movable cheeks of the specimens are generally missing, other-
wise the bodies are usually perfect.
Glabella conical, convex, provided with three lateral furrows, of
which the posterior is the largest, quite oblique; occipital furrow
deep. The glabella in its extension towards the front varieS’
some, as between it and the upturned projecting rim of the front
a broader or narrower strip of the fixed cheeks intervenes. The
fixed cheeks are broad, margined with a small reniform burrelet
at the palpebral angle of the facial line, and fromthe anterior end
of this eye-rim a faint rugosity is seen to run across the fixed
cheeks, toward the front part of the glabella, near its anterior
suleus.
Rachis uniformly tapering toward the tail-end, consisting in
the thoracic part of seventeen segments, in the majority of speci-
mens examined; but in one, evidently belonging to the same
species, I counted only fourteen, and in another fifteen. The
ribs are pretty straight, with a deep central depression and high
projecting marginal rims, which are joining the rims of the
neighboring ribs in a sharp linear groove. Each annulus of the
rachis at its juncture with the ribs is decorated with a rounded
node.
The entire surface of the body appears, in well-preserved
» specimens, covered with delicate papilli and granules.
18 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
The pygidium is very small, but clearly composed of at least
three anchylosed segments.
Bathyurus? PI. I, fig. 8.
A single specimen in the collection, or rather an impression of
one, from which I prepared a gutta-percha cast, leaves me in doubt
in regard to its generic affinities.
The smooth, rather convex glabella, without indentation by
lateral furrows and the shape of the facial suture lines, resemble
some forms described by Billings under the name Bathyurus ;
also the configuration of the other parts of the body would
agree with these, but the number of thoracic segments in the
specimen under observation is only six, while nine are claimed
for Bathyurus. Not considering the material on hand as suffi-
cient to decide whether this is a new generic type, or might be a
form of Bathyurus with a normal number of thoracic segments,
of which some became hidden by being shoved under the head,
I content myself for the present by giving an exact copy of the
gutta-percha cast formed in the impression of the slate-rock.
Agnostus. Pl. I, fig.9. Compare A. zzteger Barr.
Many of these minute crustaceans are found scattered on the
slabs of slate. They all apparently belong to one species.
The anterior valve differs from the posterior by the conical
shape of its glabella terminating near the front margin in a
bluntly pointed end; the median line of this glabella rises near
the posterior end into a root-like crest, terminating in a back-
ward projecting spinose protuberance; the posterior part of the
glabella exhibits also an indentation by lateral furrows.
The rachis or central convex protuberance of the posterior
valves is equilateral and not conical; the posterior end of it it
abruptly rounded off; a deep furrow runs across this central
protuberance on the posterior third of it; its larger anterior
portion bears a short spinose projection.
The two thoracic annuli are divided by furrows and constric-
tions into nodular partitions representing rachis and ribs, but of
too small a size to be accurately represented by a description,
or by figures. The subjoined figure of one of the specimens is
enlarged three diameters.
Besides the described crustaceans, the slates inclose also num-
erous minute Brachiopods, several of which belong to the genus
Obolella. One of these Obolellas, almost circular in outline, with
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 19
marginal umbo, exhibits most delicate concentric lines of growth
with ruffled edges, in addition to which also faint radial striz
emanating from the umbo are observable.
Other similarly rounded specimens of Obolella show fine con-
centric striation, but in comparison with the former may be
considered smooth. Also more oval-shaped specimens of Obolella
occur.
The genns Orthis, in a form similar to Orthis pepinensis is
likewise represented; another form resembles Kutorgina sculptilis
Meek. Smail shells of the shape of Leptena are also found,
and one specimen similar to Metoptoma.
Some slender stems, consisting of shining carbonaceous matter,
seem to belong to Grapholites. Finally I have to mention yet
the occurrence of a form of JVheca or Hyolites, of the same
appearance as Theca primordialis figured by Hall. As I intend
to examine this locality myself, as soon as the season allows, I
expect to be able to give before long a more complete exhibition
of the fauna inclosed within these slate-rocks.
20 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
NOTICE OF SOME PARASITIC WORMS.
BY JOSEPH LEIDY, M. D.
Filaria megacantha.
Body straight, nearly uniform cylindrical, slightly narrowed pos-
teriorly, obtuse at the ends, milk-white in color; head rounded;
mouth bounded by a pair of prominent papillate lips. Female:
caudal extremity straight, obtusely
rounded, smooth, without anal aperture.
Male: caudal extremity conical, obtuse,
= bialate; ale narrow, united around
the end of the tail, together forming a
shallow pouch, with a row on each side
of six rib-like papille, of which four
are in advance and two behind the
genital aperture. A long, curved and
Fic. 1.—Side view of caudal ex- : :
tremity of the male, highly Partially exserted penal spiculum and
magnified. a nearly straight short one.
Eight females, 35 to 60 mm. long; cephalic extremity a short
distance back, 0°75 wide; body at middle, 0°625; near the tail
end the same width. Seven males, 20 to 25 mm. long; cephalic
extremity, 0°375 wide; body at middle, 0°5; near tail end, 0°25
wide. Large penal spiculum, 2°5 to 3 mm. long; shorter one,
0°18 to 0°22 mm.; caudal bursa, 0°28 long; width of ale, 0°036
mm.
From the subcutaneous connective tissue of the neck and
mandible of the Short-eared Owl, Asio occipitrinus (Strix
brachyotus).
This appears to be a much smaller and different species from
the Filaria attenuata Rud., found in the same bird and others of
the order in Europe. Dujardin ' gives as the size of the latter
250 to 308 mm. for the female, and 136 to 148 mm. for the male,
with 1 mm. for the longer penal spiculum. Schneider ? gives for
fF, attenuata, from Falco peregrinus, 330 mm. for the female, and
115 mm. for the male, the caudal bursa of which he represents
as circular. He remarks that the Filaria of Strix and of Cecus
glandarius, referred by Rudolphi to F. attenuata, is a different —
species, but does not describe it, for want of perfect specimens.
1 Helminthes, 51. 2 Monog. Nemat., 89.
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 21
Obtained in Chester Co., Pa., December, 1886, by Dr. B. H.
Warren.
Three specimens, females, two inches in length, from the orbit
of the Hen-hawk, Buteo borealis, in the collection of the Army
Medical Museum, appear to belong to this species.
Ascaris tulura.
Body cylindrical, most narrowed and tapering anteriorly, of a
pinkish color; mouth trilobed, the lobes together nearly as wide
as the head. Female: caudal extremity nearly as thick as the
middle of the body, straight; tail short, obtusely conical, as
broad at base as the length. Male: caudal
extremity tapering, slightly incurved, with a
row on each side of minute papille (20 or
more?); tail short, conical, ending in a
spheroidal knob. 3 2
One female; length 125 mm.; width of Fre. 2—Caudal extremity
cephalic extremity a short distance from Gi eI eae gee arate
= o Highly magnified.
the end, 0375; at middle of body, 1°25;
near the tail, 1 mm. wide; tail, 0°25 long. One male; length 90
mm.; width at middle, 0°75; tail, 0°25 long; rounded end, 0°125
thick.
From the ventriculus of the Red-shouldered Hawk, Buteo
lineatus.
This worm approximates the Ascaris depressa Rud., observed
in many rapacious birds, but appears to be a different species.
Diesing! describes the tail of the male of the former as shortly
mucronate and papillose beneath, and Schneider’ figures it
according to that description.
Specimens obtained in Chester Co., Pa., December, 1886, by
De: Be Et Warren.
Ascaris sulcata Rudolphi.
Body anteriorly attenuated; posteriorly more or less closely
spiral; head with prominent lips. Female: tail conical, recurved
from the anus, ending in a minute mucro. Male: tail conical,
shortly mucronate, bialate, with a row on each side of four or
five nipple-like papille.
Female, up to 25 mm. long by 0°5 wide at middle; tail, 0°25
long. Male, 15 mm. long by 0°3 wide at middle,
1 Syst. Helm., 156. 2 Monog. Nemat., 41.
22 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
Numerous specimens were found tightly clinging by the mouth
to the lining membrane of the stomach of T'rachemys scabra.
Echinorhynchus caudatus Zeder.
Body narrow, cylindrical, nearly equal throughout, strongly
corrugated so as to appear annulated, posterior extremity conical.
Proboscis cylindrical, expanded at base, with 9 to 11 rows of
strong hooks, succeeded with about 15 rows of smaller hooks.
Length, from 5 lines to an inch; breadth, 0°5 to 155 mm. From
two individuals of the Swallow-tailed Kite, Elanoides furcatus,
in one of which they were associated with Tenia viator. Two
specimens from Strix nebulosa. Florida. Dr. B. H. Warren.
Echinorhynchus hystrix Bremser.
Body cylindrical, much corrugated, widest anteriorly and
minutely echinate. Proboscis clavate, with about a dozen rows
of hooks. One-fourth to three-fourths of an inch long and one
line wide at the fore part. Numerous specimens from the intes-
tine of the Darter, Plotus anhinga. Florida. Dr. B. H. Warren.
Tenia simplicissima.
Head small, unarmed, truncate; bothria spherical, terminal,
occupying the four angles; neck very long,
©} nearly or as wide as the head, body grad-
ually widening to the posterior third and
versely linear, subsequently reversed dish-
like, gradually longer and wider, then cam-
ae + panulate and gradually becoming longer and
Fic. 4. Cephalic extrem- P
ity: s. Segments about Darrower. Generative apertures and ova
middle; 6. Posterior ynobserved. A number of specimens from
segments. Magnified 5 °
See jee the Cod, Gadus callarias, up to 20 lines
by 1 mm. where widest. Two only of the
specimens retained the head.
FA then tapering; anterior segments trans-
Tenia Ambloplitis.
Head quadrate, spheroidal, consisting almost entirely of the
four large spherical bothria, with the summit slightly prominent
and conical or depressed and unarmed; neck very short or none;
body compressed cylindrical, gradually widening from the head
to near the posterior part where it slightly narrows to the end;
segments linear, becoming gradually longer and wider, and then
more quadrate; all deeply and pretty regularly wrinkled into
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 23
two or three annuli. Genital apertures obscure. Length 8 to 12
inches; in alcohol contracted to 3% to
5 inches; greatest width 2 mm.
Head 0°5 to 0°625 mm. long, and 0°75
to 0°875 broad. Bothria 0375 mm.
diameter. Commencement of body
0625 wide. Anterior segments 0°125
long, 0°625 wide; subsequently 0°375
long and 1°5 to 1°875 wide; posterior - 8.
seoments 0°75 long by 1 mm. wide. Fic. 7. Cephalic extremity ; 8. Seg-
Weenumber of specimens from the ™™% "= middle 20 dametos.
stomach of the Rock Bass, Ambloplites rupestris. Lake George,
New York.
This species resembles the Tenia ocellata Rudolphi of the
European Perch, Perca fluviatilis, and perhaps is the same.
Tenia Micropteri.
Head large, compressed spheroidal, with four subterminal
spherical bothria and a papilliform unarmed summit; neck none;
body obscurely segmented, and with no obvious internal organs,
posteriorly variably narrowed and obtusely rounded at the end.
Length from half an inch to an inch, and about 1 mm. wide.
Apparently a larval form; found in the body cavity of the Black
Bass, Micropterus nigricans. Six worms, soft, white, and active.
The longer ones of an inch would elongate to double the length,
becoming proportionately narrower. The head, about 1 mm. or
more in diameter, varied in length and breadth, according to
contraction, sometimes one and sometimes the other being the
larger. Lake George, N. Y.
Last summer, while at Mt. Desert, Me., I examined a squid,
Ommastrephes illecebrosa, with the hope of finding the singular
parasite Dicyema. The specimen was in bad condition, and while
I found none of the latter, I obtained from it several small worms,
which I suppose to be the larval form of a cestode. They were
yet quite active, though the host was already putrescent. I
suspected them to belong to Tetrabothriorhynchus migratorius,
observed in European cephalopods, but examination showed them
to be different. They moved so actively and incessantly, con-
tracting, expanding and writhing, that it was difficult to obtain
a clear idea of the shape of the worm. It appears most nearly
related with Tenia, and provisionally may be regarded as a
24 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
larval form of this genus. Its more evident characters may be
summed up as follows:
Tenia loliginis.
Head unarmed, without rostellum, quadrilobate, continuous
with the neck, which is variably long and narrow or short and
irregularly contracted and expanded, and is constricted from the
body. Lobes of the head elliptical, contractile and expansile
and becoming variably folded or corrugated, furnished each at
the upper pole with a hemispherical bothria. Body about as
long as the head and neck, extensile and contractile, obconic or
obovate, compressed, acute posteriorly, unsegmented. No inte-
rior organs visible except a vessel along the sides of the neck and
encircling the lobes of the head. Color white. Length to about
half an inch; width about 1 mm. Dr. H. C. Chapman informed
me that he had previously observed this parasite in the squid.
Monostomum obscurum.
Elongated elliptical, flattened, obtusely angular in front, obtusely
rounded behind. Oral and genital or other apertures scarcely
distinguishable. Length, 4 to 8 lines; width 1 line.
Numerous specimens in the stomach of a Jew-fish, Megalops —
thrissoides. Collection of the Army Medical Museum, Washington.
Distomum Aquile.
Spatulate, cochleariform, widest behind, obtuse at both ends;
mouth circular unarmed; acetabulum sessile, about as large as
the mouth. Length, 3 lines; width in front, 4 a line; behind, # of
a line. Two specimens from the trachea of the Bald Eagle,
Halietus leucocephalus. Collection of the Army Medical Meseum.
Distomum hispidum Abildgaard.
Body much attenuated in advance, covered with minute
recurved spines, which become obsolete at the back part. Head
with a pair of alate appendages covered with stronger recurved
spines, and a small group in the intervals before and behind.
Mass of eggs giving the axis of the body behind a red appear-
ance, Ova oval, 00°4 mm. long, 00°24 mm. broad.
Numerous specimens, about 4 lines long by 0°5 mm. where
widest behind. From the intestine of the Sturgeon, Accipenser
sturio, of the Delaware River, at Philadelphia.
Nitzschia elegans Baer.
Several specimens of this leech, four lines long, were taken
from the gills of the same sturgeon.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 25
JANUARY 25.
Rey. Henry C. McCook, D. D., Vice-President, in the chair.
Twenty-one persons present.
The following were elected: members; Bernard Persh, Geo. B.
Cresson, Joseph Whitehouse, William B. Marshall and William
Osler, M. D.
On a Tumor in the Oyster—Prof. Joun A. RypER remarked that
a few days since Professor Leidy handed him the soft parts of an
oyster, which he said he thought might be an interesting subject
for investigation, inasmuch as a very large tumor had grown into
the pericardiac cavity. The specimen is a very remarkable one,
and seems to be the first of the kind which has fallen under the
observation of naturalists; neither Professor Leidy nor the
speaker, in the course of large opportunities for observation,
having previously encountered anything of the sort. It is also
of great interest as proving that such pathological growths may
be developed in the mollusca, thus showing that even in the
invertebrata there may be morbid proliferations of certain tissues
which simulate in certain respects those observed to occur in
man and the higher types of vertebrates, in which they become
very dangerous and painful in character, as in the case of cancer.
The first and most striking features of this tumor, found in
the oyster, is its great size in proportion to that of the animal.
The tumor in its largest dimension measures nearly one inch
across, with a thickness of fully half an inch. The total length
of the animal, in alcohol, is about three inches, and it appears
normal in every other respect. For size, in proportion to the
dimensions of the animal, it can therefore only be compared to
those huge morbid erowths on certain parts of man known as
elephantiasis. It is subcircular in outline as viewed from the
side, and fills up the pericardiac cavity in front of the adductor
muscle; this cavity being very greatly enlarged in consequence
of the ‘erowth of the tumor. ‘The larger portion of it also lies
on the right side, and on account of its great size it has displaced
the heart forwards and to the left.
Its consistence is soft and yielding when pressed with the
finger, and consists of some eighteen very distinct lobules of
irregular size and form. Its joint of attachment appears to be
to the mass of tissue which surrounds the posterior-and rectal
part of the intestine of the animal, and appears to have grown
out in this region, or from the dorsal wall of the heart chamber.
Upon removing one of the lobules, which was cut into sections,
it was found that its histological structure was also very remark-
3
26 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [ 1887.
able, and considerably different from that of the normal tissue
of the body-mass of the animal. The sections: also showed that
the tumor was traversed by vessels, the tissues immediately
around which were more nearly of the kind normally found to
constitute the greater part of the substance of the body-mass.
The normal connective tissue is composed of large cells or spaces
with thin walls, and about the centre of each one of these a
small, complex mass of protoplasm is found which is suspended
to the sides of its vesicular wall by means of fine radiating pro-
toplasmic threads or filaments. Very minute nucleated and
rounded blood and lymph cells are also found in the general con-
nective tissue of the body-mass in small numbers.
The histological structure of the tumor contrasts with the
normal tissue in the following particulars. We find no evidence
of the presence of the central protoplasmic bodies, with radiating
processes, in the meshes of the tissue. The mesh of the tissue
of the tumor is areolar, or alveolar, the alveoli being much larger
than the vesicular cells of the normal connective tissue. While
there is a complete absence of the protoplasmic bodies with fila-
ments, the alveoli contain great numbers of very small globular,
nucleated: cells, somewhat variable in size. These cells closely
resemble the colorless blood and lymph cells of the oyster, and
some show processes or pseudopods. They are generally adherent
to the walls of the alveoli, or project in small adherent clumps
from the parietes of the alveoli and never completely fill the
meshes of the alveolar tissue, in which they are included, as do
the analogous cells in the alveoli of tumors in the higher animals.
Near the centre of each nodule there is a zone of alveoli which
are larger, and in which the small rounded cells are most abund-
ant. At the surface of the tumor there is no investment of a
truly integumentary character, so that the proliferating mass
seems to have ruptured the integument or membrane lining the
pericardium. At the surface we therefore find that there is no
true integument, but instead, the alveoli become smaller and
more compact, with the contained small rounded cells more
closely packed. The tissues of the tumor are entirely of meso-
dermal origin, and are therefore of considerable interest from the
standpoint of comparative pathology.
The speaker also referred to the presence of tumors, which
developed as outgrowths of the intestinal wall, near the pylorus,
in the common shad, and also instanced the occurrence of pro-
found lesions of the Wolffian body or kidney of the common
gold-fish, as a result of which that organ underwent complete
degeneration, with other changes which caused a bloated, drop-
sical appearence in the cavity of the abdomen. Large meshes of
fibrous tissue were, in fact, found occupying the place of the
kidney filled with a watery or colloid substance, the whole taking
up a much greater space than that originally filled by the normal
organ. ‘These data, the speaker thought, were very significant,
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 27
as showing that even the lower animals were not exempt from
morbid growths and lesions of the most serious character.
Tumors of the kind described in the oyster are probably very
rare, however, and the speaker considered that it was very fortu-
nate that the specimen had fallen into the hands of a naturalist,
such as Professor Leidy, who could so well appreciate its import-
ance and value. The tumor seems to have been benign in character,
as the oyster in other respects appears to have been healthy. It
was also localized, and did not appear in other parts of the animal,
so that it was probably i in no way infectious.
Modification of Habit in Ants through fear of Enemies.—Dr.
Henry C. McCook described a raid of the Sanguine ants, Formica
sanguinea, which occurred in a vacant lot at Asbury Park, N. J.
The co-operative nest of the two species was established quite
near the sidewalk, and the raid was directed thence into the
open lot. The marching column of Sanguines was accompanied
by a few individuals of the black slaves. What special purpose
the latter had he was not able to determine. The eagerness
exhibited by the Sanguines upon the march was very noticeable,
although these creatures are alw ays active in the nest and at any
domestic labor as well as w ar, in which respect they differ largely
from the shining slave makers, Polyergus lucidus.
On the oceasion of which he spoke, the nest of Fuscous ants,
Formica fusca, against which the expedition was directed, was
concealed among a large amount of forest rubbish, such as bits
of broken ‘chips, twigs, dried leaves, ete., that were scattered
over the barren space, interspersed here and there with tufts of
grass and low huckleberry bushes. The invaders had evidently
located the nest, but not with absolute accuracy; at least they
were not able to determine the point at which it might success-
fully be assaulted. A most animated scene was presented over
the entire surface, some three feet in diameter, upon which was
concentrated the united energies of the warriors. Over and
around this space in various lines the ants wandered, crossing
and criss-crossing each other's pathways, sometimes singly,
sometimes in couples or triplets, or in larger crowds, but always
exhibiting an attitude of fevered eagerness, applying ‘their mandi-
bles and mouth- -parts continually to the ground in search of the
point of vantage which would give them ingress to the coveted
treasures of the Fuscous ants.
A space about ten inches in diameter, strewn with dry chippage
seemed to represent the locality beneath which the blacks had
established their formicary. The Sanguines energetically pulled
away the chips, scattered them here and there, burrowed lightly
in the earth hoping to obtain an opening. About two feet
distant from this point the speaker discovered a small round
entrance or gate which was soon identified as one of the outer
approaches to the Fuscous nest, for several of these ants were
28 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
seen issuing from the gate and others were hovering around it.
At this moment one of the Sanguine army, in the spirit of a
pioneer or scout, approached this point. . Thereupon the blacks
climbed up adjacent spears of grass, where they remained
apparently on guard. After about ten minutes spent in the
exploration which has been described, the reds began to drain
off from the centre of search towards their home. In the mean-
time a considerable number of the Fuscas, who had evidently
been out upon foraging expeditions and were homeward bound
for the night, discovering the crowd of enemies who surrounded
their borders, had discreetly taken refuge like their associates on
the tufts of grass everywhere around the margin of the space
within which the Sanguines had been operating.
Two of these blacks, more courageous or cunning than their
associates, Dr. McCook observed to slip into a little opening and
disappear inside. They were presently followed by several
Sanguines, who, however, shortly returned from within and pro-
ceeded with their surface explorations, apparently having found
no clew to the main formicary. The blacks, however, had cer-
tainly safely entered their home. He greatly wondered at this,
and regarded it as an evidence of remarkable cunning and skill
in strategy on the part of the Fuscas, which had enabled them
thus so rapidly and easily to close the opening to their nest and
throw the invaders off the scent.
An hour after the commencement of the raid not more than
half a dozen of the Sanguines remained upon the scene, the rest
of their company having abandoned the search for this time at
least. This corporal’s guard of persistent scouts also gave up
the search at last and marched back home, the secretive skill of
the blacks having thus far prevailed for the protection of their
colony.
The interesting fact in the history of these curious creatures
to which Dr. McCook wished to call especial attention is, that their
instinct for kidnapping has appeared to develope on the part of
those who are the victims of it a corresponding strengthening of
instinct in the way of concealment. The Fuscous ants are ready
enough to defend their homes with their lives and often do it
successfully when their numbers are great enough to overcome
the superior physical power and warlike skill of their enemies.
But the weaker colonies of Fuscas must always yield to the
prowess and strength of the Sanguines, unless their cunning can
put their invaders at a disadvantage.
The case just mentioned does not stand alone. At various
times when the speaker had observed these black ants in such
site that they are exposed to the attacks of the Sanguines, he
had noticed that their nests were constructed very differently
from those of colonies in neighborhoods not infested by Sanguines.
In the latter positions it is the habit of the Fuscas to raise above
the surface of the ground a flattened moundlet, or sometimes a
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 29
mound of considerable size. Over the summit and at the base of
these elevations are scattered the gates or openings into the gal-
leries without the least attempt at concealment. The whole
formicary shows that its inmates dwell in security without any
fear of such special perils as those described. On the contrary,
the Fuscous colonies established in the near vicinity of their
hereditary foes have a marked tendency to omit or subdue eleva-
tions above the surface, the dumpage from interior galleries being
apparently scattered broadcast instead of piled above the central
formicary. Their gates are few and cunningly concealed, and
quantities of rubbish are scattered around with the evident inten-
tion of hiding the locality of their nest or making the approach
to it more difficult. It has thus come about with these unfortu-
nate blacks, as is the case with the human species, that the diffi-
culties of life and perils to person, offspring and home, have
developed a higher order of protective instinct.
A similar faculty Dr. McCook had observed in the case of an
amber-colored ant, the Schauffuss ant, Formica schauffussi. He
was watching the assault of a colony of Sanguines upon a
Fuscous nest in the grounds of his friend Mrs. Mary Treat,
Vineland, N. J., when he chanced to see a solitary individual
Schauffuss moving back and forwards a little distance from the
scene of invasion. Knowing that this ant is sometimes enslaved
by the Sanguines he directed his attention upon her and easily
perceived that she was putting finishing touches upon the closure
of a little hole that marked the gate of her formicary. A tiny
pebble was placed, then a few pellets of soil were added. Next
the worker walked away, took a few turns as though surveying
the surroundings, and cautiously came back. The coast was
clear. Now she deftly crawled into the small open space, and
the observer could see from the movements inside, and occasional
glimpses of the tip of her antennz, that she was completing the
work of concealment from the inside. At last her task was done
and all was quiet. Just then a single Sanguine warrior, appa-
rently a straggler from the invader’s army near by, or some inde-
pendent scout it may be, approached the spot. It walked around
the nest, which was indistinguishable from the surrounding
surface; sounded or felt here and there with its antenne; passed
over the very door into which the Schauffuss ant had disappeared,
and although its suspicions were evidently strongly awakened, it
at last moved away. The speaker felt satisfaction that the San-
guine depredator had thus been baffled and that the instinct of
home protection had proved too much for the wretched kidnap-
ping cunning. However, his pleasure was somewhat clouded by
the reflection that the slave-making scout would probably be back
before long, accompanied by the host of its fellows, and do its
work more surely. But the impression remained strong upon
his mind that the Schauffuss colonists, like the Fuscous ones
above alluded to, had decidedly modified their habits of nest
30 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
architecture to meet the perils arising from close neighborhood
to their kidnapping enemies.
Notes on the Geology of China.—Prof. Heilprin read from Miss
Aver M. Frevpe the following notes on the geology of south-
eastern China, which are of interest, inasmuch as nothing on the
physical features of that section of the empire has as yet been
published.
“T have been on atrip up the Han River, 130 miles, to the
Pass between the Kwangtung and Fokien Provinces. The moun-
tains slope steeply down into the river on both its sides for eighty
miles, and a uarrow path runs on each slope parallel with the
river at varying distances above it. Some of the mountains are
probably three thousand feet high, and the ridges at a distance
appear so narrow that a man might stride and sit on them as on
a saddle. The river keeps a general trend southward, its bends
being short ones. Its delta covers several square miles. In all
the lower part of its course it is kept in its channel by dikes, as
its sandy bed is higher than the adjoining rice fields. Just above
the city of Chow-chow-fu, thirty-two miles to the north of Swatow,
the mountains begin to rise, and they are, like those near Swatow,
almost wholly of granite. This rock extends up to Liu Ng, a
town twenty-four miles further up the river. Stone No. 1, in the
box sent herewith, is a specimen of this outcrop near the river.
Ten miles further up the granite becomes very coarse, as in No.
2. Ten miles still further, or twenty-six miles from the mouth,
the outcrops are, for a short distance, of whitish sandstone, like
No. 8, and these are immediately followed by red sandstones,
Nos. 4 and 5, which continue in mountain after mountain, gorge
after gorge, precipice after precipice, for some sixty miles. These
are magnificent exposures, the stratification showing very plainly,
with lines of cleavage nearly at right-angles to the lines of deposit.
The inclination is at all angles, some being level, some vertical
and some showing splendid curves. Here and there are to be
found apparent injections of another stone, which, I fancy, may
be trap No. 6. I also found some streaks of landscape-sandstone,
No. 7. In one place I found a huge mass of the speckled stone,
pink, with brown spots, marked No. 8, in the box. This, like all
the other specimens, is a portion of the great outcrop from a
mountain side,
“Red sandstone, in some places, almost like dark shale, in
others very hard and of a light color, extends to within ten miles
of the pass. Towards its upper boundary I noticed much inter-
mixture with light sandstone, and with a greenish stone, No. 9.
The stratification of the latter was very plain, and in places the
mountain path leads over the edges of the strata as they stand
perpendicularly. Near the pass and also through the pass (which
is four miles long, and is a wild gorge through which the river
flows in a white torrent), the outcrops and boulders are again
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 31
wholly of granite, like that of Liu Ng. Not far below the pass
there had been a landslide from one of the mountains, and it gave
a fine chance to see the original constitution of the slope. I
suppose this sandstone may be Triassic, because it appears to be
unfossiliferous. The Chinese do not make vast excavations, but
they use stone for bridges, etc. In one place I crossed a new
bridge, made of red sandstone, and I examined the quarry from
which the stone came. If there were fossils found they would,
without doubt, be used as fetiches, and I should hear of them.
The natives said no queer thing had been found or seen in the
stones. ‘There was no sign or speck of a fossil to be found about
the quarry.”
The specimens of stone accompanying the notes were com-
mented upon by Prof. Heilprin, who stated that they would be
the subject of further study and report. The district here
described is an interesting one to geologists, inasmuch as it had
hitherto received but little attention upon the part of the travel-
ers. Much of the rock surface is probably identical with that.
observed by Richthofen in the region to the west and north, the
details of which have not yet been published in his work on
China. The red sandstone (Nos. 4 and 5) described by Miss
Fielde as a possible representative of the Trias, is apparently a
member of the series referred by Richthofen to the Jurassic
period—so identified by the plant remains.
Chinese Rhizopods—Miss FIELDE also announced that during
her study of the fresh-water Rhizopods found in the streams
around Swatow, she had collected several forms identical with
those described by Dr. Leidy, from the neighborhood of Phila-
delphia (Difflugia urceolata, D. pyriformis, Arcella vulgaris).
The following was ordered to be printed :—
32 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
ON NEW GENERIC FORMS OF CRETACEOUS MOLLUSCA AND THEIR
RELATION TO OTHER FORMS.
BY CHARLES A. WHITE.
Published by permission of the Director of the United States Geological Survey.
The type species of the three generic forms which are described
in this article ! belong to the collections of Cretaceous fossils from
Texas, which I am now preparing for publication in one of the
memoirs of the U. S. Geological Survey. In their generic charac-
teristics all three of them appear to be respectively identical with
certain forms which have long been known, but which have been
referred to other genera by different authors. The features which
I now present as having generic value seem to have been overlooked
by those authors, or, so far as they were observed, they were treated
as specific characters. Two of these forms belong to the section
Melinine of the family Aviculide. The other is referred to the
Crassatellide, but it departs considerably from the typical section
of that family.
CRASSATELLIDA.
Genus STEARNSIA (gen. nov.).
Shell compressed, subtrihedral or subcircular in marginal out-
line; beaks small, closely approximate, prominent by reason of
the abrupt sloping away of both the antero-and postero-dorsal
borders; lunule and escutcheon both well defined and flattened
or excavated; hinge strong, consisting of both cardinal and
lateral teeth; cardinal teeth two in the left valve and three in the
right; both posterior and anterior lateral teeth long aud slender;
posterior laterals two in the right valve and one in the left;
anterior laterals two in the left valve and one in the right. If,
however, the overlapping border of the right valve and the enter-
ing border of the left, within the lunule, and the overlapping
border of the left valve and the entering border of the right,
within the escutcheon, be regarded as teeth, the number of both
the anterior and posterior laterals is two in each valye; ligament
1The names under which I have described these forms respectively are
Dalliconcha, Stearnsia and Aguileria. They are given in honor of Dr. W.
H. Dall and Dr. R. E. C. Stearns of the U. S. Geological Survey, and of
Sefior José G. Aguilera, of ‘the Mexican Geographical and Exploring
Commission.
PI. Il.
PROC, ACAD. NAT. SCI. PHILA. 1887,
WHITE, NEW CRETACEOUS MOLLUSCA.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 33
small, mainly internal; free margins apparently smooth; pallial
line apparently simple.
This genus agrees with Crassatel/la in having both lunule and
escutcheon clearly defined, in the general character of the hinge,
exclusive of the lateral teeth, in the nearly internal position of
the ligament, and, apparently, in having a simple pallial line. It
differs from Orassatella in its small and compressed beaks, the
laterally compressed form of the shell, in its greater number of
cardinal teeth; and in the long and slender character of both
the anterior and posterior lateral teeth.
It agrees with Astarte in having both lunule and escutcheon
well defined; but it differs from that genus in having a greater
number of cardinal teeth; in its well developed anterior and
posterior lateral teeth; and in having its ligament mainly internal.
It agrees with Circe (as represented by C. scripta, Lin.) in
its laterally compressed form, especially that of the umbonal
region, and in the number of its cardinal teeth. It differs from
Circe in having its ligament mainly internal; in the long and
slender character of the anterior lateral teeth, and in the posses-
sion of posterior lateral teeth.
It agrees with Eryphila in having both lunule and escutcheon
well defined, and, approximately, in the charagter of its posterior
and anterior lateral teeth. It differs from that genus in having
a greater number of cardinal teeth, and in having its ligament
mainly internal.
It has somewhat the aspect of Gouldia, but it differs from that
genus in having slender, well developed posterior, as well as
anterior lateral teeth. It has also a greater number of cardinal
teeth than Gouldia and its ligament is differently situated and
partly external.
The only species of this genus which I have satisfactorily
examined is the one which is described in the following paragraph.
This I regard as the type of the genus, bnt it is likely that the
Astarte carinata of d’Orbigny’ is congeneric with it.
Stearnsia Robinsi (sp. nov.) PI. II, figs, 7—9. :
Shell much compressed, trihedrak in marginal outline; lunule
long and narrow, nearly straight from end to end, concave trans-
versely; escutcheon similar in shape and character to the lunule,
but longer; beaks small, appressed, angular; ligament slightly
1 See Palcont. Francaise, Ter. Cret. iii, pl. 262, figs. 1. and 2.
34 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
exposed, and it appears to have been divided into an outer and
inner portion by a calcareous septum; umbonal furrows distinct,
producing an emargination at the posterior part of the convex
basal border and a considerable prominence of the posterior
extremity; hinge strong; the lateral teeth slender and extending
the full length of the lunule and escutcheon respectively; surface
marked by strong concentric furrows and ridges, which end
abruptly at the margins of the lunule and escutcheon respectively ;
the surface of both lunule and escutcheon plain,
AVICULIDA.
Genus DALLICONCHA (gen. nov.).
Shell resembling Gervillia in general form, in the character of
the test, in the muscular markings, and in the possession of a
pit-bearing diverging hinge area upon each valve. The valves
are more or less nearly equal in convexity; beaks terminal,
divergent; the upper borders of the hinge areas converging from
the widely separated beaks to the posterior end of the wing,
where the areas come in contact with each other by their full
width; posterior wing elongate, clearly defined from the body of
the shell; anterior wing absent, the anterior extremity of each
valve being inflexed so as to form, when both valves are together,
a three-lobed depression in the front portion of the shell, one
lobe of which ends at the extremity of each of the divergent
beaks and the other below, at the contact of the antero-basal
margins of the valves. At the bottom of the depression there is
a distinct byssal aperture, to form which both valves are nearly
or quite equally notched. The articulating portion of the hinge
of each valve is marked by more or less distinct crenulations
which cross it obliquely downward and backward, and which are
sometimes visible upon the surface of the areas above the articu-
lating border. At the anterior end of the hinge these crenula-
tions are approximately perpendicular, and sometimes denticulate
in character, and at the posterior end they sometimes assume the
form of slender, nearly horizontal lateral teeth, above which are
more nearly transverse crenulations.
Dalliconcha agrees with Gervillia in the characteristics already
mentioned; but it differs from the typical forms of that genus
mainly in the inflection of the anterior extremity of the valves,
and the consequent terminal position of the beaks, and absence
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 35
of an anterior ear. It also differs in wanting the large, longitu-
dinal teeth which characterize true Gervillia—as seen, for
example, in G. difficilis @Orbigny, and G. anceps Deshayes.'
The byssal aperture is also more clearly defined than in Gervillia.
In these differing features it agrees approximately with Perna;
but it differs conspicuously from Perna in its much more elon-
gate form, in the distinct definition of the posterior wing, the
smaller number of ligamental pits, and in the crenulation of the
hinge. This genus is more nearly related to Gervillia than to
any other genus of the Aviculide, the relation between the two
genera being somewhat similar to that which exists between the
living forms of Avicula and the Carboniferous genus Monopteria
of Meek and Worthen.
The species which is described in the following paragraph is
proposed as the type of Dalliconcha, but the Gervillia ensiformis
of Conrad is an equally typical species. The G. aviculoides of
Defrance (not Sowerby) and G. solenoides Defrance seem also
to belong to this genus, as doubtless do several other forms
which have been referred to Gervillia.
Dalliconcha invaginata (nov.sp.). Pl. II, figs. 4 and 5.
Shell long and slender; the dorsum gently concave from beak
to posterior end, and transversely flattened by the abrupt inflec-
tion of the dorsal border of each valve; wing well developed ;
the anterior depression rather deep; beaks prominent; byssal
aperture moderately large, oval; hinge-areas each bearing five
or six ligamental pits, which are of unequal size; the spaces
between the pits marked by irregular oblique crenulations,
Genus AGUILERIA (gen. nov.).
Shell resembling Perna in general form, in the character of the
test, in its muscular markings, and in the possession of a_pit-
bearing, diverging hinge area upon each valve. The valves are
more or less nearly equal in convexity; a more or less distinct
furrow passes from the dorsal border of each valve, near the
apex of the beak, to the anterior margin, defining a projecting,
more or less inflated anterior portion of the shell, which is
homologous with the anterior ear of Margaritophora. The
beaks are not prominent, situated anteriorly, but not terminal ;
ligamental pits distinct, but not numerous. The articulating
1cee Paleont. Francaise, Ter. Cret., iii, pl. 394, fig. 8; and pl. 396, fig. 7
36 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
portion of the hinge of both valves of the adult examples of the
type species is marked by crenulations or denticles, which cross
the hinge at nearly right angles in front, but at the posterior por-
tion their course is obliquely downward and backward.
In the type species a small blunt tooth is observable at the
anterior end of the hinge of the left valve; and there is a larger,
more oblique one at the posterior end of the hinge. There are
corresponding pits in the left valve to receive these teeth, and
some specimens also show a slight elevation at the side of the
anterior and posterior dental pits respectively, suggesting that
they represent incipient teeth in that valve. Byssal aperture
obscure or absent.
This genus agrees with Perna in the characters which have
already been mentioned, but it differs from Perna in the retreat-
ing position of the beak, in the projecting instead of inflected
anterior extremity of the shell beneath the beaks, in the crenula-
lation of the articulating portion of the hinge, in the smaller
number of ligamental pits, and in the absence of a well-defined
byssal notch in either valve.
It agrees with Margaritophora, as shown, for example, by the
living species M. pica Gould, from the southern Pacific Ocean, in
the character of the test, in the muscular markings, in the pos-
session of blunt teeth upon the anterior and posterior portions of
the hinge, and in the retreating position of the beaks. It differs
from Margaritophora in having well-developed ligamental pits in
its hinge areas, a crenulate or denticulate, instead of a smooth
hinge border, and in the absence of a compressed anterior ear,
and of a distinct byssal notch.
Bakevellia has some characteristics similar to those of this
genus, but its ligamental pits are fewer in number and occupy
only the middle portion of the hinge, while its lateral teeth are
two or three in number at each end of the hinge, and they are
nearly parallel to the hinge border; the latter being smooth and
not crenulate. Besides this there is some reason to doubt whether
Bakevellia really belongs to the family Aviculide, as do Perna
and its congeners; and to which family this new genus is
referred.
The species which is described in the following paragraph is
proposed as the type of Aguileria. Sefior Aguilera has shown
me some examples of a species which he obtained from the Cre-
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 37
taceous rocks of the State of Puebla, Mexico, which is probably
congeneric with this Texan form. It is probable also that the
Gervillia Renauxiana of Matheron, and other published forms,
ought to be referred to the genus here proposed. A form from
the Cretaceous of Brazil, described by me some years ago under
the name of Gervillia dissita, but still unpublished, seems to
belong to this genus. If those species should be assigned to this
genus it may be that the crenulation of the hinge will be found
to be an inconstant character; but the other characters which are
_ herein described are regarded as a sufficient basis for its generic
identity.
Aguileria Cumminsi (sp. nov.). Pl. Il, figs. 1-3.
Shell inflated, obliquely subelliptical in marginal outline; test
thick, hinge line moderately long; hinge areas broad, bearing
three or four ligamental pits; hinge border including the surface
of the cardinal teeth, distinctly crenulated in adult examples;
posterior cardinal tooth moderately large; anterior one small
and indistinct.
EXPLANATION OF PLATE II.
Aguileria cumminst White. ,
Fic. 1. Left side view of an adult example.
Fic. 2. Dorsal view of the same.
Fic. 8. Interior view of a left valve, somewhat narrowed by lateral
compression, showing the hinge and cardinal area.
Dalliconcha invaginata W.
Fic. 4. Right side view of a restored outline, reduced to three-fourths
natural size.
Fic. 5. Front view of an adult example, restored as to its outline from
a partially crushed condition.
Dalliconcha ensiformis Conrad, sp.
Fic. 6. A left valve, showing hinge and front features; introduced for
comparison.
Stearnsia robbinsi W.
Fic. 7. Left side view of a medium-sized example.
Fic. 8. Dorsal view of the same.
Fic. 9. An imperfect example, showing the hinge of the left valve.
All the figures except 4 are of natural size.
38 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
FEBRUARY 1.
The President, Dr. JosepH Lerpy, in the chair.
Twenty-two persons present.
Papers under the following titles were presented for publication ;
“On the Cretaceous Formations of Texas, and their reations to
those of other portions of North America,” by Charles A. White.
“On Zine—Manganese Asbestos,” by George A. Koenig, Ph. D.
Parasite of a Bat.——Dr. Leipy remarked that it was a common
opinion among country people that swallows and bats were
infested with bed-bugs and often introduced them into houses.
He had convinced himself that the Cimex infesting the cliff
swallow was a different species from the bed-bug." He had
repeatedly examined bats without finding Cimex. On one of
two small bats, from Panama Bay, presented this evening by
Dr. Wm. H. Jones, he found two singular insects, which appear
to be the Polyctenes fumarius, described by Prof. Westwood from
a bat of Jamaica. They are about half of the size given for the
species, but otherwise appear to agree in all respects. It has
four jointed antennz, with the first pair of limbs short and the
other pair long. The insect has distinct hemiclytra.
On a Peculiar Form of Molybdenite—Dr. Gro. A. Kornie
called attention to a specimen of Molybdenite from the German-
town quarries, presented by Mr. Thomas Meehan. The Molyb-
denite forms a perfect cylinder, 2 inches long hy +2 inch
diameter. It shows a lamellar structure, but the leaves are
twisted and felted together. Owing to the remarkable shape the
speaker had supposed the substance to be graphite and placed
by some persons—quarrymen—in a + inch drill-hole, ramming it
down tightly. Blowpipe tests, however, show the substance to
be Molybdenite. In the open tube a peculiar odor was noticed
not quite like that of Selenium but near it, and it was believed
to be desirable that a quantitative analysis should be made.
FEBRUARY 8.
Mr Tuomas MEEHAN, Vice- President, in the chair.
Fourteen persons present.
A paper entitled “On Invertebrates from the Eocene of Mis-
sissipp1 and Alabama,” by Otto Meyer, was presented for pub-
lication.
The following were ordered to be printed.—
1 Proc. 1877, 284.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 39
ON THE CRETACEOUS FORMATIONS OF TEXAS AND THEIR RELATION TO
THOSE OF OTHER PORTIONS OF NORTH AMERICA.
BY CHARLES A. WHITE.
Published by permission of the Director of the U. S. Geological Survey.
The true relations of the different Cretaceous formations which
have long been known to exist within the State of Texas to each
other, and to those which have been recognized in other portions
of North America, have not hitherto been satisfactorily known.
Several eminent geologists have written upon the subject, and
considerable diversity of opinion has prevailed among them.
The former impracticability of obtaining information by personal
observation over any considerable portion of that great region;
the destruction by the civil war of the work so well begun by
Dr. Shumard, and the limited knowledge then possessed by any
one of the general geology of North America, were doubtless the
causes which prevented a satisfactory solution of this question.
Now numerous railroads traverse the State, the hostile tribes
which barred the progress of travelers have been quieted or
removed, and a good outline of the geology of the continent is
known.
With the opportunity of availing myself of these advantages I
entered last year upon an investigation of the Texas Cretaceous,
placing the field work in charge of my chief assistant, Mr. Robert
T. Hill. In the latter part of the season I traversed the State in
various directions in company with Mr. Hill, reviewing his work
and making additional observations. The following section is
the result of these labors, and I am so well convinced of the
accuracy of its essential features that I do not hesitate to adopt
it as the basis of my paleontological and museum work in relation
to the Texas Cretaceous, although the order of superposition
therein given is so different from what it has been generally sup-
posed to be.
The remarks at the right hand side of the column, which repre-
sents the section, are by Mr Hill, who has with considerable
care compared this section with those which have hitherto been
published as representing the Texas Cretaceous.
4()
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF
[1887.
General Section of the Cretaceous Strata of the Eastern half of
ke
Navarro Beps.
Texas.
7. Strata in Navarro County, given this name by B. F.
Shumard and correlated with the Ripley Group in 1861; but
not placed in his general section of 1860; correlated with
Ripley Group at ‘lerrell by R. H Loughridge; 10th Census
Report, Vol. V. Included by Roemer, together with 4 and 5
of this section, in his ‘‘Kreidebildungen am Fusse des Hoch-
landes.”’” Outcrops along a narrow area upon the western
border of the Gulf States Tertiary.
6. Outcrops to the west of No. 7, occupying the so-called
Black Prairie region. Of great thickness and uniformity of
| Dinosaur SANDs.
: 6 character. Recognized by Owen as extending into Arkansas,
wn : and as equivalent with the rotten limestone of Mississippi,
= AusTIN named ‘‘Austin Limestone’? by B. F. Shumard in 1860, and
placed in his section between Nos. 2 and 3 of this section, but
ea} LIMESTONE. its true relation not then recognized. Included by Roemer
n with No. 7. Sherman, Dallas, Waco, Austin and New Braun-
By fels are approximately upon the western border of the out-
5 crop.
Oo
5. 5. Yellow arenaceous, and blue argillaceous shales, narrow
exposure west, and along the northern half of No 6. Is the
EaGie Forp lower part of Shumard’s Austin limestone, and also the
nee ‘‘Arenaceous Group’ and ‘‘Fish Bed’’ of his Lower Cre-
: taceous.
4, 4. Coarse ferruginous sands and clays; fossiliferous. Has
been alluded to by various writers as ‘‘Tertiary,’’ ‘‘Miocene,”’
TimBeR CREEK “‘Quaternary,’’ etc. Its outcrop is coextensive with the region
B know as the Lower Cross Timbers. It apparently rests un-
EBS: conformably upen No. 3.
8. Strata of this division at Fort Washita, I. T., partially
described in 1854, and called ‘‘Senonien’’ by G. G. Shumard,
wrongly placed by B. F. Shumard, in his section, immediately
3. beneath No. 6 of this section. More comprehensively de-
scribed by Jules Marcou in 1855, and referred to the Neoconian.
WaAsHITA Is not distinctly separable from No. 2, either by the character
of the strata or fossil contents. Outcrop occupies a_ narrow
’ Divison. belt extending southward from old Fort Washita via Denison.
N Denton, Fort Worth, Salado, Austin, and westward of San
a Antonio; was included together with No. 2 by Roemer in his
4 “«Kreidebildungen des Hochlandes.”’
an
= . .
en) 2. In 1848 this division was included by Roemer in his
1S) *‘Kreidebildungen des Hochlandes,’’ as seen in buttes north
a 2. of Fredericksburg. It is also a Hic 3 Peak ai
, the ‘‘Caprina Limestone’? and ‘‘Caprotina Limestone’ o :
a PERUSE ES aUats F. Ghumsed in 1860. These authors places all except the last |
3 Division. named strata at the top of the whole Texas Cretaceous series.
Outcrops along the borders of the paleozoic areas in Central
Texas.
AE 1. Coarse silicious sand,, popularly called ‘‘pack-sand.’’
Occurs between the base of the fossiliferous Cretaceous and
the carboniferous series. Contains vertebrate remains.
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 41
The fossils which have been collected from the strata of this
Texas section, have not yet been fully studied with reference to
the different formations which they represent. That work has,
however, so far progressed as to give some important indications
as to the equivalency of certain of these Texas formations with
those which different geologists have investigated in the regions
to the eastward, westward, and northward from that State; and
also to show that a large part of the Texas Cretaceous section is
not represented by any of the formations referred to. The
following table will serve to formulate these indications, but as
the recognition of equivalency is more satisfactory in some cases
than in others, each case is considered separately in the following
paragraplis :—
MisstssiPPt Texas SECTION. WESTERN SECTION. Urrer Missourt
SECTION. RIVER SECTION.
Ripley Group. Navarro Beds, Fox Hills Group. te wie aie
Rotten Limestone. | Austin Limestone. { Nos 2 & 3,or Ft. Benton
Tombigbee Sand. Eagle Ford Shales Colorado Group. and Niobrarra Groups.
Eutaw Group. Timber Creek Beds. Dakota Group. No. 1, or Dakota Group.
Wanting. Washita Division. Wanting. Wanting.
Wanting. Fredericksb’g Division. | Wanting. Wanting.
Before making comparisons of the Texas section with the
others of this table, it is necessary to make some explanations
with reference to the relations of the latter to each other.
The Mississippi section indicated in the foregoing table is that
which was published by Prof. E. W. Hilgard in his official report
upon the geology of the State of Mississippi." The western
section is a modification, first proposed by King,’ of the well-
known Upper Missouri River section of Meek and Hayden,
which is represented by the right-hand column. King, however,
placed the equivalents of Nos. 3, 4 and 5 of the Upper Missouri
section all together under the name of Fox Hill Group. This
being an unnatural grouping of the strata upon paleontological
grounds, I still further modified it by placing Nos. 2 and 3
together under King’s name of Colorado Group; and Nos. 4 and
5 together under one of the original names of Fox Hills Group
1 Geology and Agriculture of Mississippi, 1860, p. 3;
2U.S. Geol. Expl., 40th Parallel, vol. i, pp. 305, 306.
3 Ann. Report U. S. Geol. Surv. Terr. for 1876, p. 22.
42 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887
These two consolidated groups, together with the Dakota Group,
the separate identity of which all geologists have recognized, con-
stitute the western Cretaceous section of the foregoing table.
The New Mexican Section of Prof. Newberry seems to be
practically identical with the western section of the foregoing
table. He seems to indicate, however, that there is in that region
a blending of the Dakota Group with the next overlying forma-
tion. It may be noted also that at least one of the species which
Mr. Meek describes in that report as coming from the middle
division of the New Mexican Section? is now known to belong
to a lower horizon than that of the base of his section, namely,
to that of the Comanche division of the Texas section.
Southward from Dakota and Montana I have never been able
to separate the equivalent of No. 4 from that of No. 5 of Meek
and Hayden’s section, either stratigraphically or paleontologi-
eally. It is for this reason that I have referred all strata that
carry any of the fossils which they indicated as characterizing
either of those divisions to the Fox Hills’ Group alone. On the
other hand, while Nos. 2 and 3 are so closely related to each
other paleontologically that they are now generally regarded as
constituting one natural group, an upper and a lower lithological
division of the same are quite as clearly recognizable in southern
Colorado and northern New Mexico as in the Upper Missouri
River region.
It is a significant fact that while the separate identity of the
Dakota group has been indicated by specific identity of plant
remains, which are found over a large region, as well as by
stratigraphical position, there is a marked difference in the char-
acter of the invertebrate fossils from different localities. I refer
especially to those which Mr. Meek’* and myself* have published
as coming from strata of that group in Central Kansas, as com-
pared with the few which have been found in southeastern Dakota.
The Kansas forms are mainly or wholly of marine origin, but
they are such as may have lived in littoral waters; while those
of southeastern Dakota are of different species, and indicate a
1 Newberry’s Geol. Rept. Expl. Exped. from Santa Fe to Junction of
Grand and Green Rivers, pp. 32, 121, 122.
2 Ib., p. 126, pl. i, figs. 7 a, 0d.
3 Ann. Report U. S. Geol. Sur. Terr. for 1870, pp. 297, 301-313; Vol. IX
U. S. Geol. Sur. Terr., p. 24.
* Proc. U.S. National Museum, Vol. 2, pp. 295, 296, pl. 5.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 43
less saline condition. It is also significant that, with the excep-
tion of some marine mollusca which Mr. Meek doubtfully referred
to the Dakota group in New Mexico,' no other invertebrates than
those which the Kansas and Dakota localities have furnished,
have been reported as coming from that group. The facts which
have been mentioned, others which will be referred to, and our
present knowledge of the general geology of that western region,
all seem to indicate that while the greater part of the Dakota
group, as it is now known, is a non-marine deposit, we ought to
expect to find it to merge into a marine deposit to the southward.
Now in making comparisons of the Texas Cretaceous rocks
with those which have been observed in other parts of the conti-
nent, we find that the whole Comanche series represents older
strata than are included in any of the other published sections
of North American Cretaceous except perhaps that of California.’
The strata of the Comanche series are known to extend north-
ward from Texas into the Indian Territory, and some of its
characteristic fossils have been found in southeastern Kansas.
Fossils belonging to this series have also been found at various
points in western Texas and the adjacent southeastern part of
New Mexico. They have also been found at various points in
Mexico, one locality being upon the western side of the Sierra
Madre, in the Mexican State of Sonora.’
Judging from all the information which I have been able to
obtain, I infer that none of the strata of the Comanche series
extend beyond the eastern boundaries of Texas, nor further
northward than southern Kansas. It seems probable also, that
while this series is well developed, both faunally and _strati-
graphically, in Texas, it has, or originally had, its greatest
development within the region which is now the Republic of
Mexico.
Again, judging from present information, there seems to be a
complete faunal break at the top of the Comanche series. That
is, I am not yet aware that a single fossil species of that series
passes up into any of the upper members of the Texas Creta-
ceous Section. The Comanche series is therefore not only greatly
restricted in its geographical extension to the eastward and
1 Newberry’s Geol. Report before cited, p. 121.
2 White; Bull U. S. Geol. Surv., No, Vol: 15, p. III, 1885.
8 Gabb; Paleontology of California, Vol. II, p. 257.
44 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
northward, but there seems also to be a clear line of demarkation
between that series and the upper one, within the State of Texas.
No unconformity of the strata of the upper series upon those of
the latter has yet been satisfactorily observed, but it can hardly be
doubted that there is at least a brief chronological break between
the two series. This latter question, however, I am not now
prepared to discuss.
From the foregoing remarks it will be seen that it is the forma-
tions of the upper series alone which can now be discussed with
reference to equivalency with the formations represented by the
other sections of the foregoing table. Beginning with the lowest
member of the upper, or Gulf series, namely, the Timber Creek
beds, I regard those strata as, at least in part, equivalent with the
Dakota group of the Western and upper Missouri sections, and
perhaps equivalent with the Eutaw group of the Mississippi
section. Of the latter supposed equivalency I have no paleonto-
logical evidence; and the suggestion is made mainly in conse-
quence of the stratigraphical position of the Eutaw group.
That the Timber Creek beds are equivalent with the Dakota
group is indicated not only by the position of each with refer-
ence to overlying formations, but I have recognized some of the
species which were first found in the Dakota strata of central
Kansas, in the Timber Creek beds of Denton County, Texas.
The Eagle Ford shales are recognized as equivalent with the
bluish shales, or lower portion of the Colorado group as it is
known in Colorado and the adjoining territories. That is, I have
recognized certain of the species of the Eagle Ford shales as
identical with some which occur in the Colorado group to the
northwestward of Texas. The lithological character of the shales
of both regions is also similar.
As to the equivalency of the Eagle Ford shales with the
Tombigbee sand of the Mississippi section, the only reason
I now have for offering that suggestion is its stratigraphical
position.
That the Austin limestone is equivalent, both stratigraphically
and paleontologically, with the rotten limestone of the Missis-
sippi section, as has been shown by other authors, there seems to
be no reason to doubt. I also regard those Texan strata as
equivalent with the upper division of the Colorado group. The
Texan strata are not only quite similar in lithological character
1887. | NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 45
to those of that division as it is known in southern Colorado and
New Mexico, but I have recognized several species of fossils as
common to the Austin limestone and those more northern strata.
The paleontological evidence that the Navarro beds are
equivalent with the Ripley group of the Mississippi section, as
presented by Shumard,’ seems to be beyond question. It is also
known that several molluscan species which characterize the
equivalents of the Navarro beds in the Cretaceous of the Gulf
and Atlantic coast regions, are not uncommon in the Fox Hills
group of the Western section.
The Fox Hills groups of the Western section is clearly recog-
nizable as such in the valley of the Rio Grande, in western
Texas, where it is found to contain a number of the characteristic
species of the group. The evidence is conclusive, also, that the
Fox Hills strata there, are, or originally were, directly continuous
with those of that epoch which are found to the northward.’ Of
the present, or former, direct stratigraphical continuity of the
western Fox Hills strata with their presumed equivalents in
Eastern Texas, and in the Gulf and Atlantic coast regions,
present evidence is not so clear.
Although the identity of certain species, found in those
eastern and western strata respectively, is beyond reasonable
question, there is a decided difference, both paleontological and
lithological, between them. Still, there seems to be good reason
for regarding them as having been synchronously deposited.
Their differences were perhaps largely due to the presence of a
land area between an eastern and a western marine area during
the Fox Hills-Ripley epoch, to the southward of which the two
marine areas coalesced. This view seems to find corroboration
in the fact that most of the species which are common to both
the eastern and western strata, are open sea forms, and conse-
quently had a wide geographical range. Those species which
differ most in the two regions respectively, are apparently such
as had a more restricted range.
We now come to consider the relation of the Fox Hills strata
and the Navarro Beds respectively, to overlying formations. It
appears to be unquestionable that the Lignite Tertiary Beds of
eastern Texas rest directly upon the Navarro Beds, just as the
1 Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., viii, p. 189.
2 This volume, pp. 18-20.
46 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
equivalent Tertiary strata rest upon the Ripley Group in Missis-
sippi; but in Texas the actual contact seems not yet to have been
seen by a competent observer. The faunal difference also, between
the Navarro and the Lignite Beds, plainly indicate a change in
physical conditions, and also a chronological break of some
extent. The break, however, may have been only a brief one.
On the other hand, the strata of the Fox Hills Group in the
region of the Rio Grande are directly overlaid by those of the
Laramie Group, the two formations so blending together that no
sharply defined plane of demarkation between them can be
recognized. Thus we find the stratigraphical series in that
western region to be an unbroken one up to the top of the
Laramie Group; while the eastern series is broken at the top
of the Navarro Beds. We are therefore still in doubt as to the
true stratigraphical relation of the Laramie Group with the
Eocene Tertiary of the Gulf region. If that relation is ever
discovered, it now seems certain that we shall find it in the
southwestern part of Texas, or the adjacent part of Mexico.
The Dakota Group of the western and upper Missouri sections
rests directly upon Jurassic strata, which in turn rest upon a
series known as the “Red Beds,” and usually regarded as of
Triassic age. Those Red Beds are there found to rest upon the
Carboniferous, or upon older paleozoic rocks. No equivalent of
the Jurassic strata referred to have been recognized in connec-
tion with the Texas Cretaceous section as given in this article;
and they seem to have entirely thinned out before reaching the
region of Central Texas. In that region, the strata next under-
lying the Comanche series are clearly either those of the
Carboniferous, or of the Red Beds. The latter are not known
to exist to the eastward of the Carboniferous area of Northern
Central Texas, but they reach considerable thickness upon the
western side of that area, where they are usually known as the
Gypsum formation.
It appears from the investigations upon which this article is
based that certain of the members of the Texas Cretaceous
section have not heretofore been recognized, and that the true
order of superposition of the formations has been misunderstood,
the theoretical section of Marcou' being more nearly correct than
any heretofore published. It also appears that while the lower
1Proc Boston Soc. Nat. History, Vol. VIII, p. 93.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 47
series of that section is not represented in any of the other
published sections in North America, the upper series may be
satisfactorily correlated with the western and upper Missouri
sections; and in part, at least, with the Cretaceous formations of
the Gulf, and Atlantic coast regions.
In making these investigations the really valuable work of
Dr. B. F. Shumard has been adopted so far as practicable, and
a large proportion of the fossil species which he published, but
did not figure, have been recognized. The admirable work of
Prof. Roemer also is found to be as useful to-day as it was when
it was first published, forty years ago.
ON ZINC—MANGANESE, ASBESTOS.
BY GEORGE A KOENIG, PH. D.
During a visit to the Franklin Zinc Mines in 1879, I obtained
from Mr. George, then Superintendent of the Trotter mine a
considerable quantity of Sussexite. Among this there was some
material which did not quite look like the rest, and was subjected
to an investigation. This material I will designate A. After
finding it of interest, I obtained from my friend and colleague,
Dr. F. A. Genth, a bluish asbestiform mineral from the same
locality; this will be designated as material B.
Both appear as stiff, rather columnar fibres, and effervesce with
acid. But after treatment with dilute HCL, a fine silky mass ot
fibres remain, and these were analyzed. The needles appeared
under the microscope slightly yellowish or colorless, whilst the
substance in bulk appeared bluish, like crocidolite or brown black.
These needles fuse readily before the blow-pipe with intumes-
cence to a black globule, and behave thus like Sussexite. But
no color is given to the flame, so characteristically green in
Sussexite.
48 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
After extracting with acid, whereby A gave 73 asbestos, 27
calcite, and material B gave 85 asbestos, 15 calcite, the residue
was thoroughly dried at 130°C., and then analyzed as follows:—
A. B.
SiO? — 55:84 53°50
ALO? = — 1:36
FeO? = —— 8-12
MgO = 19°58 1458
CaO = 10-00 6:62
MnO = 479 1:70
yO = 459 7-10
FeO = 2:40 4:68
HO = 3:20 3°34
100-40 101-00
The molecular ratio is formed for—
SiO’: (Mg, Ca, Fe, Zn, Mn H’) O
A. 1°8613 1:9716
1:00 1:06
(Mg, Ca, Fe, Zn, Mn H’) SiO?
SiO? : (AI’Fe)’: Mg, Ca, Zn Fe H’) O
B. 1°7833 : 0°1279 : 1°6911
Or, if we add the sesquioxides to the protoxides—
17833
= 1:00 C016
1:8190
We have here then two Bisilicates, remarkable for the poly-
basic composition, which are either pyroxene or amph‘bole
asbestiform. I am inclined to classify them as amphibolic. It
is probable that these silicates are in a number of collections
under the name of Sussexite, with which notably the material A
shows much resemblance.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 49
Frespruary 15.
Mr. Gro. W. Tryon Jr. in the chair.
Twenty-four persons present.
Grampus Rissoanus on the American Coast.—Prof. Hrtuprin
called attention to the recent stranding on the New Jersey coast, at
Atlantic City, of Risso’s whale, Grampus Rissoanus, a form readily
distinguished from other allied cetaceans by the peculiar slaty
lines which are irregularly distributed over the body. The speaker
thought that this was the first instance of this singular Mediterranean
species having been recorded from the trans-Atlantic waters, and
emphasized the difficulty of drawing lines of delimitation to the
oceanic faunas. The specimen in question was dark-slaty in color
on the sides, verging to black on the back and measured about
eleven feet in length.
FEBRUARY 22.
Mr. CHarves Morris in the chair.
Nineteen persons present.
Origin of the Excretory System in the Earth-worm.—Professor
Epmunp B. Witson, of Bryn Mawr, Pa., laid before the Academy
an account of his observations on the development of Lumbricus
olidus, calling especial attention to the remarkable similarity that
exists between the development of the nephridia and the origin of
the excretory system in the vertebrates. The gastrula is formed
by a process of invagination. Upon the establishment of the
germ-bands, they are found to be essentially similar to those of
Clepsine, ending behind in eight large cells, by the continued
division of which the bands increase in length as the embryo grows.
Two of these large cells are mesoblasts (giving rise to the dis-
sepiments, muscles and vessels) two are neuroblasts (giving rise to
the ventral nerve-cord), two are nephroblasts (giving rise to
the excretory organs)and two give rise to cells whose fate could not
be determined. From each of these cells a row of cells extends for-
wards on the ventral side of the body between the ectoblast and
entoblast. The rows are at first one cell wide, but are converted in
front into solid cords, several cells in thickness. The principal
interest of the development lies in the origin and fate of the rows
50 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
produced by the nephroblasts; these rows are designated as the
nephridial rows. In each somite a solid outgrowth from each ne-
phridial row takes place into the coelom and is ultimately conver-
ted into the nephridium of the corresponding side. Thus the
nephridia arise as metameric outgrowths from a solid cord of
cells that lies in the somatopleure; and their mode of development
is therefore essentially similar to that of the segmental tubes of the
vertebrate head-kidney or pro-nephros.
An examination of the origin of the nephroblast demonstrates the
fact that it is originally an ectoblastic cell, which extends to the
surface of the body and is only in rather late stages to be distin-
guished from other ectoblastic cells by its greater size and by the
fact that it sinks below the surface. It always remains, however,
embedded in the ectoblast, and unquestionably is derived from that
layer. The nephridial rows and the nephridia to which they
give rise are therefore ectoblastic structures.
This conclusion is believed by Prof. Wilson to establish two
interesting homologies, namely: between the nephridial row of
Lumbricus and the Wolffian or segmental duct of the vertebrates,
and between the series of nephridia of annelides and the vertebrate
head-kidney or pro-nephros. It has very recently been shown that
in Raja, Rana, Lacerta, guinea-pig and the rabbit, the segmental
duct is derived directly from the ectoblast by a mode of development
essentially like that of the nephridial row of Lwmbricus. Hatschek,
Eduard Meyer and Lang have already called attention to the close
resemblance between the Wolffian duct of vertebrates and the
longitudinal canal that unites the nephridia in the larval Polygordius
and in certain adult annelides. Prof. Wilson’s observations, taken
in connection with those of Meyer supply the embryological proof
that the two structures are actually homologous, and that the.
excretory systems of annelides and of vertebrates are constructed
upon fundamentally the same type and originate by similar modes
of development. Attention was called to the direct bearing of this
_result on current theories relating to the origin of the Vertebrata.
Marcu 1.
The President, Dr Jos. Lrrpy, in the chair.
Twenty-six persons present.
A paper entitled “The Summit Plates in Blastoids, Crinoids and
Cystids and their morphological Relations,” By Charles Wachsmuth
and Frank Springer, was presented for publication.
The following was ordered to be printed :—
ada. 1887.
l
Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phi
O. Meyer, del.
Meyer, Eocene Invertebrates.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 51
ON INVERTEBRATES FROM THE EOCENE OF MISSISSIPPI AND
ALABAMA.
BY OTTO MEYER. Ph. D.
In the illustrations to the following paper, the figures of some
insufficiently known species of the Southern Old-Tertiary are included.
Notes on these are given. The species referred to are mostly small
ones. All the mentioned material has been collected by me and is
in my collection.
Odostomia Boettgeri n.sp. PI. III fig. 4.
Subulate, polished. Nucleus sinistral, vertical, partly hidden,
Adult whorls eight, with an impressed line below the suture.
Suture distinct. Mouth subelliptical. Inner lip with a strong,
nearly horizontal fold. At some distance from the outer lip there
are within six raised revolving lines.
Vicksburg, Miss. “Lower Vicksburgian.”
Turbonilla major n.sp. Pil. IIT fig. 3.
Nucleus sinistral, its axis horizontal, its volutions separate.
Adult whorls many, subconvex, covered with strong transverse ribs
and densely spirally striated. The spirals do not extend over the
ribs. Mouth subquadrangular. Inner lips with a strong oblique
fold. Base spirally striated. Jackson, Miss. Rare.
The more common Turbonilla in Jackson is a form which I
should rather put to Turbonilla neglecta Mr. than to the above ~
species. Compared with 7. major it is much smaller and more
slender and the spiral striae are scarcely distinct, otherwise it is
very similar.
DENTITEREBRA 2. gen.
Turreted ; transversely ribbed. Aperture narrow, terminating in
a short anterior canal. Inner lip callous, very slightly striate.
Outer lip crenulated internally, sinous posteriorly. Base striated.
On account of its mouth this genus is probably to be placed
among the Columbellidae, in which family it is conspicuous by its
turreted spire and transverse ribs. It is perhaps to be considered a
subgenus of Coluwmbella. If this is not the right position, it may
belong to the Pleurotomidae.
we
52 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
Dentiterebra prima n. sp. Pl. III fig. 2.
The pointed nucleus consists of four volutions. Five adult
whorls are covered by strong transverse ribs, eighteen on the body
whorl; the surface else being smooth. Base with strong revolving
lines, which are perceptible on the callus of the inner lip. The
inner lip is else without striae or granulations. Crenulations of the
outer lip six. Suture distinct, impressed. Claiborne, Ala.
I found only the figured specimen. It has the appearance of a
young Terebra.
Pleurotoma Aldrichi n. sp. Pl. III fig. 7, 7a, 7b.
The nucleus consists of one and a half smooth inflated embryonic
whorls. Adult whorls six; they are convex, raised below the
suture, covered by transverse ribs and elevated spiral lines. Of the
spiral lines those on the middle of the whorl are the strongest.
The sinus is above the middle of the whorl. Aperture less than
one third of the shell, with rather straight canal. The young shell
shows a simple outer lip and a smooth, but not callous inner lip.
The older the shell the more deposit on the inner lip it has. Old
specimens apparently have strong folds within the outer lip.
Jackson, Miss.
I found eight specimens. The specimens, 7 b, has longitudinal
folds within the outer lips, the uppermost of which is the strongest;
besides it is somewhat stouter than the others. I consider it,
however, as an old specimen of the same species, for the surface,
though partially skinned, shows the same ornamentation, the
characteristic nucleus is the same, and one of the other specimens
shows an indication of the upper fold within the outer lip.
Tornatella volutata n. sp. Pl. III fig. 11.
Oval-elongate. The nucleus consists of one and a half smooth
volutions, the first volution standing almost vertical and being partly
hidden. Five adult whorls are slightly convex and covered with
impressed revolving lines. These lines are slightly punctuate;
number about six on each whorl, the body whorl excepted, where
they are numerous and towards the base increase in distinctness and
become closer. Mouthrathernarrow. Outer lip sharp. Inner lip
with a strong fold below the middle, and slightly covered by
callus. Suture impressed.
Vicksburg, Miss. “Higher Vicksburgian.”
I found only the figured specimen. The species is considerably
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 53
cylindrical and approaches the subgenus Actaeonidea Gabb, from the
Tertiary of the West Indies. It lacks, however, the anterior
truncation of the collumella of Actaeonidea.
Unicardium? eocenense n. sp. Pl. III fig. 14, 14 a.
Small, tumid, solid. Margin subquadrangular, rounded
anteriorly, truncate posteriorly. Beak turned anteriorly, before it
a small cordate lunule. Lunular edge in front of the beak somewhat
expanded. Below the beak one tubercular cardinal tooth (left valve),
lateral teeth nearly obsolete. Anterior muscular impression
elongated elliptical, posterior impression cordate-elliptical. Pallial
impression notentire. Insiderough. Margin entire. Surface with
indistinct concentric impressed lines, crossed by more distinct
radiating lines. This ornamentation is wanting on the umboneal
part and more distinct near the margin. The radiating lines are
slightly more distinct on the posterior slope. - Red Bluff, Miss.
The only found specimen, a left valve, shows three sinuations of
the pallial line behind.—I have little doubt that this species belongs
either to Unicardium d’Orbigny, or Fimbriella Stoliczka, or is to be
placed in their neighbourhood. These two genera, however, are not
known from the Tertiary formation, and if the Red Bluff form
should prove to be a different and new genus I propose the name of
Cordiula for it.
MIKROLA 2. gen.
Minute, subtrigonal, inaequilateral. Anterior side rounded,
posterior side attenuated. Ligament in a trigonal pit below the
beak. In the right valve this pit is lodged between two compressed
cardinal teeth. Left valve without distinctly developed teeth.
Muscular impressions oval? Pallial line sinuated behind. Surface
concentrically ribbed. Margin entire.
At first sight the genus has much resemblance to Spheniopsis,
Sandberger, especially the left valve. But the dentition of the right
valve is entirely different, and the genus may even not belong to the
Myidae. I cannot discover any gaping of the valves.
Mikrola mississippiensis n. sp. Pl. III fig. 16, 16a, 16b.
Beaks almost obsolete. The concentric ribs of the surface end at
the posterior terminal slope. Umbonial part smooth.
Red Bluff, Miss.
I found three double-valves of this species, which varies very
much in the size and number of the concentric ribs. While one
54 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887..
of the specimens shows only three large and distant concentric ribs,.
another one is covered by about nine ribs.
Turritella carinata H. C. Lea. Pl. III fig. 1, la.
Turritella carinata H, C.Lea; Am. Journ. Science vol. XL, Jan. 1841. p 96, pl. 1 fig. ro.
Fig. 1 represents the largest specimen which I have from Claiborne
and fig. 1a is a specimen which shows two of the round embryonic
whorls. The name of this species is not preoccupied by Turritella.
carinata I. Lea, because this latter species is apparently identical
with a form previously described.
Eulima lugubris Lea. sp. Pl. III fig. 8.
Pasithea lugubris Lea; 1. Lea. Contrib. to Geology 1833, p. ror, pl. 4, fig. 81.
Eulima aciculata, Lea.sp. Pl. III. fig. 5.
Pasithea aciculata Lea; I. Lea. Contrib. to Geology, 1833, p. 102, pl. 4, fig. 82.
The specimen which I figure is from Jackson, Miss. It is.
apparently identical with Lea’s Claiborne species.
Pasithea guttula Lea. Pl. III fig. 6.
Pasithea guttula Lea; 1. Lea. Contrib. to Geology 1833, p. 104, pl. 4, fig. 86.
Cylichna Dekayi, Lea. sp. (var?) Pl. IIT fig.10.
Bulla Dekayi Lea; 1. Lea. Contrib. to Geology, 1833, p, 200, pl. 6, fig. 215.
The specimen which I figure, is from Jackson Miss. It is:
perhaps to be considered a variety of the Claiborne species.
Tornatina crassiplica Conr. sp. Pl. III fig. 9.
Bulla crassiplica Conr. Journ. Ac. Philad. 1, 2nd Ser., Pl. 113, pl. 11, fig. 5.
Ringicula mississippiensis Conr. Pl. III fig. 12.
Ringicula mississippiensis Conr. Journ. Ac. Philad. I, 2nd Ser. p. 117; Pl. 18, fig. 36.
Dentalium subcompressum Mr. PI. III fig. 13, 15a.
D. subcompressum Mr.; Am. Journ. Sci. 1885, XXIX p. 462. D. subcompressum Mr,;.
Bull, 1. Geol. Surv. Ala. 1886, p. 64, Pl. 3, fig. 3, 3a.
Fig. 13 represents a specimen with complete posterior end,
showing also in this respect the great similarity of this species to:
Dentalium compressum Mr. from the German Oligocene.
Tellina eburneopsis? Conr. Pl. III fig. 15a, 15b.
? Tellina eburneopsis Conr. Am. Journ. Conch, 1865, p. 138, Pl. 10, fig. 17.
Conrad describes this species from the so-called locality “Entre-
prise, Miss.” The specimen, which I figure,is from Jackson, Miss..
Fig. 15b gives the profile of the posterior side, showing the
emargination at the posterior fold.
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 55
NOTES.
The following mistake is to be corrected. I described a specimen
from Claiborne as “Crucibulum antiquum” (Bull. 1, Geol. Surv. Ala.
1886, p. 68 pl. 1 fig. 11). Having recently carefully cleaned the outside
of this specimen it proved to be a Balanus with preserved operculum.
In an article “Beitrag zur kenntniss des Alttertiaers von
Mississippi und Alabama’* TI have given. (p. 16, 17) a list of
Foraminifera of the eocene of Mississippi and Alabama, which I
collected and which were determined by Mr. A. Woodward. The
following species, also collected by me and determined by Mr.
Woodward, have to be added to this list.
Clavulina cylindrica Hantken; Matthews Landing, Ala.; Clai-
borne, Ala.; Jackson, Miss.; Wautubbee, Miss.
Cristellaria calear Linné sp.; Matthews Landing, Ala.; Jackson,
Miss.
Cristellaria cultrata Montfort sp,; Vicksburg, Miss. “Lower
Vicksburgian.”
Textularia agglutinans V’Orb.; Jackson, Miss.
Polymorphina oblonga VOrb.; Jackson, Miss.
Polymorphina problema VOrb.; Jackson, Miss.
Miliolina agglutinans VOrb.; sp; Claiborne, Ala.
Truncatulina lobatula Walker and Jacob sp.; Jackson, Miss.
Truncatulina dutemplei VOrb.; Jackson, Miss.
Pulvinulina canariensis? @Orb; Jackson, Miss.
Nonionina depressula Walker and Jacob sp.; Wautubbee, Miss.
EXPLANATION OF PLATE III.
Fig. 1. Turritella carinata H. C. Lea, nat. size; Claiborne, Ala.
Fig. 1a. . e “showing two embryonic
whorls; Claiborne, Ala.
Fig. 2. Dentiterebra prima n. gen. et n. sp; Claiborne, Ala.
Fig. 3. Turbonilla major n. sp.; Jackson, Miss.
Fig. 4. Odostomia Boettgeri n. sp.; Vicksburg, Miss.
Fig. 5. Eulima aciculata Lea. sp.; Jackson, Miss.
Fig. 6. Pasithea guttula Lea; Claiborne, Ala.
Fig. 7. 7, 7a, 7b. Pleurotoma Aldrichi n. sp.; Jackson, Miss.
Fig. 8. Eulima lugubris Lea; Claiborne, Ala.
Fig. 9. Tornatina crassiplica Conr. sp.; Vicksburg, Miss.
*Jahresber. d. Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft, Frankfurt
a. M. 1886. 2 plates.
56 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
Fig. 10. Cylichna Dekayi Lea. sp. (var?) Jackson, Miss.
Fig. 11. Tornatella volutata n. sp.; Vicksburg, Miss.
Fig. 12. Ringicula mississippiensis Conr.; Vicksburg, Miss. “Lower
Vicksburgian.”
Fig. 13. Dentaliwm subcompressum Mr.; Vicksburg, Miss.
Fig. 13a. The same specimen, view of posterior end.
Fig. 14, 14a. Unicardium? eocenense n. sp.; Red Bluff, Miss.
Fig. 15a, 15b. Tellina eburneopsis? Conr.; Jackson, Miss.
Fig. 16, 16a,16a’. Mikrola mississippiensis n. gen. et. n. sp.; Red
Bluff, Miss.
Marcu 8.
Mr. CHAarues Morris in the chair.
Fifteen persons present.
The deaths of Jos. Wilson M. D. and Bernard Persh, members,
were announced.
Marcu 15.
Mr. Joun H. REDFIELD in the chair.
Seventeen persons present.
Papers under the following titles were presented for publication:—
“A List of the Carices of Pennsylvania.” By Thomas C. Porter.
“A Prodrome of a Memoir on Animal Locomotion.” By
Harrison Allen M. D.
On the First and Second Sets of Hair Germs Developed in the
Skin of Fetal Cats——Prof. Ryder remarked that in a foetal Kitten,
three and one-half inches in length, which he had examined, the
germs of certain hair follicles in the skin were more prominent than
the great majority of other hairgerms. These larger hair germs were
especially obvious on the back and on the top of the head, where they
formed very slight superficial elevations of the epidermis. Along the
middle region of the back and head, these more prominent hair germs
formed linear series or rows, which seemed to correspond somewhat
in position to the arrangement of the stripes of color on the back of
the adults, as seen in the Ocelot and the black and grey-striped
variety of the domestic cat or grimalkin. On the sides and on the
limbs the linear arrangement of these larger hair germs disappeared
entirely, and they were distributed in an irregular manner, pretty
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 57
uniformly amongst the smaller or less developed hair germs, which
were everywhere far more numerous, being very probably the germs
of the woolly coat or under-pelt.
It is possible that these larger hair germs represent the rudiments
of hairs, which are more particularly sensory in function, and which,
like the vibrissee about the snout, and the groups of tactile hairs
above the eyes, and the two groups on the cheeks of many mammals
are more richly supplied with sensory nerves than others. The
distribution of such tactile hairs in the Mammalia, was also consid-
ered by the speaker, who referred to the studies of Eschricht, Stan-
nius and his own, on the distribution of such tactile hairs on the
snouts of the foetuses of various genera of Cetaceans, in which group
it had been ascertained that they furnished very good characters
diagnostic of species. It was also suggested in support of the view
that larger hair germs on the body and head of the foetal cat, were
sensory in function, since they seemed to be arranged in conformity
with the color areas on the back, which, as had been pointed out by
Prof. Harrison Allen, were the recipients of special branches of the
superior twigs of the intercostal rami of the spinal nerves in certain
animals, (Tamias.) Hairs with a special function have also been
found in other regions in the skin of mammals; as for example,
certain hairs described by Schobl on the interdigital wing mem-
branes of bats.
Upon reflection, however, the preceding view of the facts bearing
upon the development of two kinds of hair germs in the skin of the
foetal cat, were not wholly satisfactory. It was therefore deemed
best to subject the skin of the foetus in question to still more search-
ing scrutiny. A portion of the skin from the top of the cranium of
the foetus was, therefore, carefully pealed off, stained in borax car-
mine and cut into sections and mounted as a series. This series of
sections revealed several very interesting points, which it was impos-
sible to make out from a more superficial examination.
It was found that the epidermis at this stage was only five or six
layers of cells deep, and that there were two very sharply defined
types of hair germs growing downwards from it into the corium.
The larger and more advanced of these hair germs or follicles were:
very much thicker and larger than the others, and had penetrated.
more deeply into the underlying corium, than the less developed
ones. At the point where the larger germs joined the epidermis, the
latter was thickened so as to form the elevations marking the posi-
5
58 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
tions of the larger hair germs, when viewed from the surface.
Further study also showed that the rudiment of a hair was well ad-
vanced in the larger follicles, while in the smaller ones only the first
traces of the hair bulb had been developed, without as yet having
given rise to the beginning of a cornified hair shaft. In both kinds
of follicles the rudiments of sebaceous glands had been developed
from the sides of their necks, though a lumen or cavity had hardly
as yet been developed within them. The rete mucosum consisted of
of scarcely more than a single layer of rounded cells; of this layer
the younger developing follicles are principally composed.
These observations show that there are two distinct types of hair
germs developed in the skin of the foetal cat, one of which is much
more advanced in development, and far less numerous, at the same
period, than the other. It has also been shown that the larger germs
have a certain orderly linear arrangement in some regions, as, for
instance, along the dorsal region. The questions which now present
themselves in addition to the interpretation already suggested, relate
to the nature of these different kinds of hair germs. It seemed to him
not improbable, as surmised by Professor Leidy, that the larger germs
may be those of the contour hairs, while the smaller ones represent
the germs of the finer hairs of the under pelt or woolly coat. Yet
this view does not dispose of the question raised by the fact of the
orderly arrangement of the larger germs along the back; nor are
they numerous enough to be the germs of the contour hairs. It maybe
that this orderly arrangement relates to an ancestral condition, in
which the hairs were fewer and while the ancestral mammalian
type was still nearly cold-blooded. This view is supported by the fact
that the temperature of the blood of the most reptilian of the mam-
malia, viz., the Ornithodelphia, is considerably below that of ‘the
Didelphia and Monodelphia, and that in at least one of these forms,
Echidna, the spines, which represent hairs, are arranged in rows.
In the other genus, Ornithorhynchus, the contour hairs are flat, the
under-pelt of wool hairs being very densely set, while the contour
hairs are not. Whether the quills or spines of Echidna are to be
regarded as having descended by development from contour hairs is
not known, but it is to be admitted that hairs of that type are most
likely to have been developed into quills or spines, since they gener-
ally project above the level of the woolly coat and have a much heavier
shaft, which is always nearly straight and not crimped. Such an
origin may, with much show of probability, be ascribed to the quills
of the porcupine.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 59
In anumber of mammalian orders, there is a marked tendency
toward a dorsal, longitudinal striation, or linear alternation of bands
or dots of color, and in a number of cases, this striation is well
marked only in the young. This seems to be more than a mere co-
incidence and probably indicates that in the primitive or ancestral
Mammalia, such a pattern was widely prevalent, if not universal.
On the sides, on the other hand, there is a tendency toward alterna-
ting vertical colors with transverse bars on the limbs. This is a
well-marked feature in the tiger, zebra and gnu. Later on it ap-
pears that these bars have broken up into dots, giving rise to the
dappled or the spotted appearance of such forms as the leopard,
giraffe and horse. These features have a very important phylogen-
etic significance, and point to an ancestral form, in which the color
areas were disposed in bands. Looking about, amongst the lower
groups, it is in Reptilia alone that we frequently find striping both
longitudinal and transverse, and in that it is now admitted by some
eminent authorities that the Mammalia are descended from the
Reptilia (Theromorpha), some explanation is afforded of the preva-
lent type of color marking in the young of many feral Mammalian
forms which are not striped when mature.
The dorsal longitudinal rows of hair germs in the skin of the
foetal cat also afford confirmatory evidence. Their coincidence with
the bands of color and precocious development, indicates that they
are remnants of a more primitive hairy coat. Their linear arrange-
ment makes it possible to compare them with the linear and longitu-
dinal arrangement of the feathers in birds and of scales in reptiles.
In that hairs of mammals, feathers of birds and the corneous scutes
of reptiles, are closely related structures and developed from homol-
ogous layers of the epidermis in these different classes, it is highly
interesting to discover that the set of hair germs, which are the first
to develop on the back of the foetal cat, also show the primordial, lin-
ear arrangement of scales and feathers as observed on the backs of
reptiles and birds.
60 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
A PRODROME OF A MEMOIR ON ANIMAL LOCOMOTION.
BY HARRISON ALLEN, M. D.,
Emeritus Professor of Physiology in the University of Pennsylvania,
The writer has undertaken at the request of the representatives
of the University of Pennsylvania a series of studies on animal
locomotion. The subject has been approached from the point of
view presented by instantaneous photography, and has been espec-
ially based on the results obtained by Mr. Eadweard Muybridge.
The writer desires in this-connection to return his acknowledg-
ments to Mr. Muybridge for opportunities in examining early
impressions of the plates, which he is engaged in publishing under
the auspices of the University, and also to state that he is indebted
to Prof. Thomas Eakins for facilities afforded in studying the results
of an experiment in the use of a modified form of Marey’s wheel,
devised by him in photographing the action of the horse in motion.
This short paper embraces the points which have been thought to
have sufficient interest to appear in advance of the final memoir,
and will include observations on the movements of the quadrupeds
only.
Many of the statements could have been deduced from data
already accessible to the writer. But since he wrote the paper
immediately after the inspection of the photographs his conclusions
may be said to be based upon them. At the same time he has not
hesitated to include materials not embraced by the photographs.
Whenever practicable the study of a given series was carried
on at the same time that the animal itself lay dissected before
him. For example, when studying the photographs of the
elephant he had the good fortune, through the courtesy of Prof.
Huidekoper, to dissect the limbs of an elephant. He has also dis-
sected! the horse, the ox, the raccoon, the sloth, the skunk, the
Virginian deer and the domestic cat.
THE USE OF TERMS.
It is necessary to propose the use of a few terms which will clearly
express in a word a meaning which otherwise would require the
employment of a cumbersome phrase. The words flexion, extension
1JIn this connection the writer wishes to give especial acknowledgments to his
friends Prof. Horace Jayne and Mr. Edwin A. Kelly.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 61
abduction, adduction, pronation and supination imperfectly express
many animal movements. Thus no adequate word exists for the
movement of the hand upward and downward when the forearm is
held in semipronation. Such a motion is of importance in describ-
ing the wing of the bird and the bat. The term Planation is
here thought to be convenient since it expresses the fact that the
movement of the hand is in the plane of the flexor surface of the
forearm. Planation includes both pronation and_ supination.
Contraplanation as easily indicates a movement at an angle to the
plane of the flexor surface of the forearm. It embraces flexion and
extension and is not especially demanded, except that a term which
includes both flexion extension as well as abduction, as used in the
sense of abduction of the thumb, may be acceptable.
In like manner it has been found useful to employ terms for the
different orders of the foot-falls.
Synchiry indicates that the right and left foot of a single pair
act together. Thus in the gallop the horse moves all the feet
synchirally. The movement of the lower limbs in man is also
synchiral. The feet may act alternately or together.
Asynchiry would naturally embrace the movements in which
the feet act in combinations of hind and forefeet. But since these
movements are varied and important, it has been thought desirable
to substitute a positive term, and the word heterochiry * is pro-
posed. The walk, the trot and the rack are heterochiral, since
the fore foot is followed, not by its fellow, but by a hind foot.
When the hind foot alternates with the fore foot of the same side
lateral heterochiry occurs. When with the fore foot of one side
the hind foot of the opposite side alternates, diagonal heterochiry
takes place.
In connection with the terms flexion and extension the following
will be used:— The movement of a limb against the medium in
which the animal is moving constitutes the “stroke.” The
movement in preparation of the stroke constitutes the “recover.”
In the description of the “hand over hand” movements of the
sloth and the monkey, the word “ flexion” has no place; yet the
“recover ” is used in as exact a sense as in the movements of any
other animal.
1 While assuming the responsibility for this word the writer desire at the same
time to say that it was suggested to him in a conversation with his friend Prof:
iN: Gill?
62 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
When a limb of a terrestrial quadruped rests upon the ground it
may be said be “on,” and when not on the ground, to be “ off.”
The term “sura” will be employed as a convenient word to
include the hind limb from the knee to the ankle. “ Crus” has been
retained so generally as a synonym for the entire posterior extremity -
as not to be available.
“Stroke” is the period of impact. It is included in flexion, and
constitutes its first stage. ‘ Recover” embraces the last stage of
flexion and the whole of the period of foreward movement. The
terms “stroke” and “ recover” are by no means the same as flexion
and extension. ‘They simply express certain phases of limb-function
which are seen during the acts of backward and foreward movements.
THE POSITION OF LIMBS.
In studying the motions of the limb of a vertebrate the position
which answers to that taken by the salamander, when at rest, is
assumed to be the best adapted for comparison. In this position
the limb is horizontal to the plane of the longitudinal axis of the
body. The venter of the body and the ventral surface of the limb
are on the same plane nearly. The limb of a reptile varies scarcely
at all from that just named. When a terrestrial animal is erect the
limb instead of being on the same plane with that of the body is moved
a quarter of a circle downward. In the bird the posterior extremity
when at rest is in the same position as the terrestrial, but the ante-
rior extremity, in marked contrast to it, is flexed. When extended
the extremity is thrown upward to a position as far removed from
the horizontal position of the salamander in one direction as is that
of the terrestrial quadruped in the other.
In the movement of all limbs the directions in the main are for-
ward and backward. Both the movements are oblique but between
them is a position which is straight. In the terrestrial animal
this position may be said to answer to a line in the anterior extremity
which lies immediately in advance of the withers and in the posterior
extremity to the centre of the acetabulum.
THE MOVEMENTS OF LIMBS.
If a limb can be conceived moving in vacuo it can be at once
understood that propulsion is impossible. For propulsion can follow
only upon the initiation of an impetus and this in turn only by
the resistance of the limb against the medium in which the animal
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 63
is moving, or in the case of the terrestrial animal, the surface of the
ground.
The resistance of the air and the water are so much less than
that of the earth that the acts of flying and of swimming become
radically different from those of walking, of running, or of any
allied movement. In flying and swimming the resistance made by
the limb against the medium in effecting an impetus does not arrest
the movement of the pinion or the foot; whereas in terrestrial
movements the instant that the foot strikes the earth the resistance
is great and the arrest is complete.
In the swimming turtle the first stage of the recover drives the
foot in spite of the resistance of the water to the point at which the
second stage begins. With some slight modifications the same is
true of fossorial animals. Thus in flying, in swimming, and in
burrowing the limb describes a continuous movement which unites
the path of the stroke to that of the recover. In the animal moving
on the surface of the ground, the foot being brought to rest, an
absolute break occurs between the beginning of the act of recover
and its completion,—the time which would be required to describe
the interval and thus to complete the union corresponds to the period
that the foot is on the ground. This period constitutes the stroke.
The limb rests on the ground until the trunk moves beyond the
point at which it can maintain itself. It is lifted at intervals which
are dependent upon the momentum of the moving mass. One, two,
or three limbs may be on the ground at the same time. The rates
at which the succession of the foot-falls occur, in their turn, depend
not only upon the rate of speed at which the animal is moving,
but on the gait as well.
KINDS OF WORK DONE BY THE LIMBS.
The kinds of work done by the limbs are two in number, viz., that
done by the fore limbs and that done by the hind limbs. The hind
limbs are more powerful than the fore limbs, and in some animals,
as the kangaroo and the jumping mouse, are the main effectives.
No terrestrial animal depends for support upon the fore limbs.
When all the limbs are equal or nearly equal in length, the prepon-
derance is still in favor of the hind limbs owing to the fact that the
great backward movement of these limbs on the trunk is made possible
by the fixation of the bones to the pelvis and through this structure
tothe vertebral column. Not only is this the case but the hind limbs
alone possess the power of propelling the body so as to throw upon the
64 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
fore limbs the labor of aceommodatiug themselves to the rate of work
of their more powerful associates. When an animal is moving at a
high rate of speed, as in the gallop, the synchiral action of the hind
limbs projects the body with such force as to compel the fore limbs to
act simply as props which successively carry the body forwards until
one of the hind limbs is again in position to give the body a second
impetus. In proof of this assertion it is only necessary to observe
that the greatest height attained by the trunk is that secured by the
rump when both hind feet are off the ground. The statement gener-
ally made that the horse leaves the ground by one of the fore feet
creates the impression that he gains the springing force from this
foot, all the previous movements being in preparation for such a
spring. In place of this statement another is here substituted, viz.,
that the horse springs from that hind foot which last leaves the
ground and is “off” from all feet when he simply relinquishes the
support afforded by the last prop, that is to say the last fore foot.
If the fore and hind limbs were based on the same plan the motion
of an animal would be either a series of springs—the two feet push-
ing against the ground at the same moment—or a series of steps, the
two feet moving alternately. While closely resembling one another
the two limbs are not on the same plan. If any motion takes
place in the vertebral column at the time that the fore limb is
moving it is noticed that it occurs in the region of the neck. The
scapula has a slight motion downward and backward. The motion
in the hind limbs occur in the region of the lumbar vertebree while
the pelvic bones are fixed. The limit of the forward motion of the
hind limbs is dependent upon the flexibility of the lumbar vertebree.
The limit of the similar motion of the fore limb is determined by
the action of the muscles alone. The forward motion of the fore
limbs is essentially the same in all animals; but the forward
movement of the hind limbs is variable, because the lumbar vertebree
differ in degrees of flexibility. In unguiculates there is more lumbar
flexibility than in ungulates. In backward movements the opposite
obtains, for in these positions the fore limbs can be carried back
toavariable distance. Inthe deer and its congeners the fore foot can
be brought to a point near the centre of the body, and the limb be
vertical. In the horse the fore limb in backward strain is very
oblique and the foot while well placed under the trunk cannot reach
the centre. In the macaque the fore foot cannot pass beyond a
vertical line which intersects the trunk a little back of the shoulder-
joint. The backward movement of the hind limb is nearly the
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 65
same inall animals. The leg is always carried in a direct path, the
limit of the movement being determined solely by the length of the
limb. In a word the forward movement is the less constrained in
the fore limb while the backward movement is the least constrained
in the hind limb. The most variable movements are the backward
for the fore-limb and the forward for the hind-limb.
The foot in all animals excepting the horse (and even in this single
toed form the movement of the foot is nearly all essentials the same)
is carried forward in semipronation. The foot strikes the ground on
the outer border. Pronation now begins and is completed by the
time the perpendicular line is reached. The foot leaves the ground
by the inner border (the toes being successively abducted) so that
the pressure of the body is borne from without inward across the
foot. The foot is always everted as it leaves the ground. In a
plantigrade animal, as the raccoon, the foot is carried during the last
part of recover nearly parallel to the plane of support. In the
rapid motion of ungulates the foot may actually touch the
ground nearly to the hock. In backward strain the hock or
heel is gradually raised and at the end of strain the animal is seen
touching the ground by the tip of the inner functionally active toe.
In the horse the foot leaves by the tip of the hoof. It is likely that
the degree of impact of the outer border of the foot will be found to
correlate with the degree of development of the calcaneo-sural joint*
since the weight must be carried along the outer border to the rest
of the limb. At the end of backward strain the limb from the knee
distally is in the same line. The moment flexion begins eversion is
established, and the limb becomes angulated outward at the ankle.
The main axis of the proximal facet of the astragalus is correlative
with the degree of this obliquity. It is most pronounced in the
horse, less so in the ox, and scarcely at all in the hog.
It has been already seen that when the limb is in the position of
arrest and the momentum carries the body beyond the perpendicular
line it is thrown into “backward strain.” The instant that the strain
begins the knee is seen to move outward and the hock to move inward,
The parts of the foot below the heel remain unchanged. The impact
of the structures of the limb are thus impaired in backward strain.
It is well known that in the pentadacyle forms the foot can be
readily rotated at the medio-tarsal joint and it is a reasonable
*A name proposed for the joint existing Letween the fibular process of the
calcaneum and the fibula or the tibia.
66 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
assumption that it is at this joint that the distal part of the limb
moves when the entire limb rotates outward. The femur, the bones
of the leg, and the astragalus act as one factor; and the caleaneum and
the remaining bones of the foot as the other factor. The socket for the
proximal motion occurs at the hip, and that for the distal at the
concavity of the scaphoid bone. There is also considerable motion
between the calcaneum and the cuboid bone and between the cal-
caneum and the lower end of the fibula, if this bone is present, or
with the outer end of the tibia if it is absent. Outward rotation of
the main portion of the limb carries the caleaneum slightly inward
by reason of the articulation between the calcaneum and the bones
of the leg, Facets are here present in most terrestrial mammals.
In the wombat the articulation is evident. It is present in a
rudimentary form in man,
The outer surface of the caleaneum of the bear is marked by a
stout roughened ridge as it enters into articulation with the fibula.
In the dog the surface is a small embossment which probably is in
contact with the fibula only at the time of the backward strain. In
a single old dog examined the same ridge is present as in the bear.
A similar ridge which developed under the stimulus of diseased
action is seen in the skeleton of the tiger in the Museum of the
Academy.
As the knee is rotated outward the outer border of the foot is
slightly inverted. This disposition is opposed by the peroneus
longus muscle which everts the foot. Coincident with the inversion
the external crucial ligament becomes tense and the tendency to
torsion is checked.
The first movement noticed in the limb after it is beyond the
centre of gravity is the flexion of the foot. In the horse the hoof is
thrown backward and the under surface of the foot is directed back-
ward, the heel being raised first. The sole is next directed
upward. In animals possessing more than one functionally active
toe the toes are quickly adducted in the air so as to offer the least
resistance to the impetus of the entire body. Associated with the
above a pronounced flexion of all parts of the limb occurs excepting
at the hip, where the movement is slight. A movement of the thigh
toward the trunk is indeed discernible. In animals possessing long
thigh-bones, such as the elephant, the movement is more decided than
in the ungulates. The same remarks are applicable to the move-
ments of the humerus. The degree to which flexion is carried is
more marked in the young than in the adult, and in terrestrial than
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 67
in arboreal creatures. In the sloth (Cholepus) flexion is absent,
the limbs being advanced by a swinging motion at the shoulder and
the hip.
The unaided eye receives the impression of backward movement
but fails to be impressed with forward movement. It may hence be
inferred that the former is a quicker movement than the latter.
In the fore limb the last state of extension of the forearm answers
to the action of the extensors of the carpus and of the digits. In the
less delicate movements of the hind limb the muscles which extend
the tarsus and the toes move the foot with less precision and it is
likely with less speed.
Biological Department of the University of Pennsylvania, March Ist, 1887.
68 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
Marc#H 22.
The President, Dr. Lerpy, in the chair.
Twenty-four persons present.
The following were ordered to be printed :—
A LIST OF THE CARICES OF PENNSYLVANIA.
By Tuos. C. Porter.
All the species of Carex contained in this list are represented in
the herbarium of Lafayette College by specimens from all the coun-
ties named, with the single exception of C. Torreyi. It will be
observed, that, contrary to the common usage, the county is put first,
the particular station next, and then, the name of the collector, in
italics. When the latter is wanting, it indicates that the author
himself is the collector.
The order of arrangement and most of the changes in nomencla-
ture are taken from the Synopsis of North American Carices, by L.
H. Bailey, Jr., published in the Proceedings of the American Acad-
emy of Arts and Sciences, 1886.
1, Carex paucifiora, Lightf.
SusquEHANNA, near Montrose, Garber, 1869; WaAyne, Torrey
Lake, Garber, 1870. Very rare. The southern limit of the species.
2. Carex subulata, Michx.
ScHuyLKILL, Broad Mountain, in a bog beside the railroad, in
company with the very rare and local Juncus Smithii, Engelm.,
1866. According to Darlington’s Flora Cestrica, it has also been
found in Chester County.
3. Carex folliculata , iE.
Monrokr, Pocono; LAckAwANNA, Moosic Lake ; Luzerne, Car-
bondale, Garber ; ScHuyLKILL; NorTHAMPTON, Pen Argyl; DEL-
AWARE, Tinicum; LANCASTER, Smithville Swamp; CrenTRE, Bear
Meadows; VENANGO, East Sandy Creek, Garber. Common in the
mountains, but rare elsewhere.
4, Carex intumescens, Rudge.
Monrok, Water Gap, Knipe; NortHAmpton; Bucks, (Moyer’s
Cat.); CHEsTER, (Fl. Cestr.); Lancaster; Buatr, Boecking ;
ARmMstTRONG, Knipe.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 69
5. Carex Grayii, Carey.
CLEARFIELD, McMinn, 1867; Mercer, Garber, 1868. DeELA-
WARE, Tinicum, A. H. Smith, 1867. Very rareeast of the Alleghenies.
6. Carex lurida, Wahl. (C. lwpulina, Muhl.).
Monrok, Water Gap, Knipe; NorrHampton; Bucks, (Moyer’s
Cat.); DeLaware, Dr. George Smith; Curster, (FI. Cestr.) ;
LANCASTER; FRANKLIN; HUNTINGDON.
7.Carexlurida, Wahl., var. polystachya, Bailey.
CLEARFIELD, McMinn; CrAwrorp, Conneaut Lake, Garber.
Rare. Not known east of the Alleghenies.
8. Carex oligosperma, Michx.
CENTRE, in a bog four miles west of Pennsylvania Furnace ;
CargBon, borders of Round Pond, Aug., 1867. Very rare. The
southern limit of the species.
9, Carex rostrata, Withering.
Monror, Tobyhanna Mills and Tunkhannock Creek; ERrIs,
Presque Isle, Garber.
10. Carex rostrata, Withering, var. utriculata, Bailey.
Monroe, Dr. Traill Green, Moyer; Sutiivan, C. E. Smith;
TroGca, Garber; CENTRE, Bear Meadows; Exx, McMinn.
11. Carex monile, Tuckerman.
Bucks, Sellersville, Fretz ; CHEster, (FI. Cestr.); Hunrinepon,
Barrens, Lowrie; Erx, McMinn; CrAwrorp, Garber; MERCER,
Middlesex, Garber.
12. Carex Tuckermani, Boott.
Mowrok, Pocono; Huntinecpon ; CLEARFIELD, McMinn; MEr-
cER, Garber. Rare.
18. Carex bullata, Schkuhr.
LANcAsTeER, Smithville Swamp; Lycomine, Limekiln Swamp,
McMinn. Rare and local.
14, Carex retrorsa, Schweinitz.
Huntinepon, near Pennsylvania Furnace, Boecking, 1870. The
only station known in the State. The southern limit of the species.
15. Carex tentaculata, Muhl.
MonroE; Norraampron; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); CHESTER,
(Fl. Cestr.); Lancaster; CenTRE; Barr, Boecking; CLEAR-
FIELD, McMinn; Cuarion, Garber. Common and abundant.
16. Carex tentaculata, Muhl., var. gracilis, Boott.
Wayne, Garber; Monroe; Huntrncpon; CLEARFIELD,
McMinn.
70 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
17. Carex Schweinitzii, Dewey.
Monrok, Pocono, Schweinitz. The specimen is from Schweinitz
himself, but it does not seem to have been collected in Pennsylvania
since his day.
18, Carex hystricina, Muhl.
Monrog, Water Gap, Knipe; NorrHampton, Easton; Bucks,
(Moyer’s Cat.); CursTer, (Fl. Cestr.); Lancaster; FRANKLIN;
HUNTINGDON.
19. Carex Pseudo-Cyperus, L. Erte, Presque Isle, Garber.
20. Carex Pseudo-Cyperus, L, var. comosa, W. Boott.
Wayne, Garber; Pixe, Fiot; NorTHAMpPTON, near Easton;
Bucks, Diffenbaugh, (Moyer’s Cat,); LANcAstER; HuNTINGDON,
Alexandria; CRAWFORD, Conneaut Lake, Garber; ER1E, Presque
Isle, Garber.
21. Carex stenolepis, Torrey.
Huntinepon, near Alexandria; GREENE, Greensboro, Garber.
Very rare and local.
23. Carex squarrosa, L.
Bucks, Diffenbaugh; PHitapELPHtIA, Diffenbaugh ; DELAWARE,
Dr. G. Smith; CHester, (FI. Cestr.), LANcAstTER; HUNTINGDON;
CLEARFIELD, McMinn; Mercer, Garber; ALLEGHENY, Knipe.
23. Carex Shortiana, Dewey.
FRANKLIN, in meadows around Mercersburg. The only station
known in the State. Its northern and eastern limit.
24. Carex scabrata, Schweinitz.
Wayne, Garber; Carson; NorrHampron; Bucks, (Moyer’s
Cat.); Philadelphia, on the Wissahickon, C. E. Smith and Dr, Jos.
Leidy; LANCASTER; FRANKLIN; SULLIVAN, C. E. Smith; Buatr,
Lowrie. Along shaded rivulets, especially in the mountains. Not
common.
25. Carex vestita, Willd.
NorrHamprton, Pen Argyl; Bucks, Bristol, Diffenbaugh, (Moyer’s
Cat.); Lancasrer, Smithville Swamp; CLEARFIELD, Me Minn ;
Cameron, McMinn. Rare.
26. Carex filiformis, L.
Wayne, Garber; Monror, Water Gap, Knipe; Erte, Presque
Isle, Garber, Guttenburg. Rare.
27. Carex filiformis, L., var. latifolia, Boeckeler,( C. lanuginosa, Michx.)
Monroe, Water Gap, Knipe; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); CHESTER,
(Fl. Cestr.); Berks; Lancaster; FRANKLIN; ELK, McMinn.
1887. NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 71
28. Carex trichocarpa, Muhl.
Monror, Water Gap, Knipe; Bucxs, (Moyer’s Cat.); LANncas-
TER; FRANKLIN; CENTRE, Boecking; ELK, MeMinn.
29, Carex riparia, W. Curtis. (C. lacustris, Willd.)
Wayne, Garber; Bucks, Garber ; DeLAWARE, Tinicum, A. H.
Smith ; Tioca, Garber; ELK, McMinn. Rare.
30. Carex Buxbaumii, Wahl.
Lenicu, near Mountainville; Bucks; LANcAsTER; FRANKLIN.
Rare.
31. Carex vulgaris, Fries.
Monror, Water Gap, Knipe; Centre, McMinn. Very rare.
Its southern limit.
32. Carex aquatilis, Wahl.
Erre, Presque Isle, Guttenberg.
33. Carex stricta, Lamarck.
Wayne, Garber;. MonroE; NorTHAMPTON; CHESTER, (FI.
Cestr.); Berks, Garber; LANCASTER; FRANKLIN; ELK, McMinn.
Very common and variable; growing in marshy places in tussocks,
34. Carex aperta, Boott.
Bucks, Moyer, Fretz; Lycomine, A. H. Smith, McMinn. Rare.
35. Carex torta, Boott.
NortTHAMPTON, Fiot; Bucks, Nockamixon Rocks; CHESTER, Can-
by; FRANKLIN; Perry, Garber; SvuLiivan, on the Loyalsock,
C. E. Smith; Huntrnepon; Briarr, Burgoon’s Gap; CLEARFIELD,
Sandy Lick, McMinn; Ex, McMinn. Along the margins and
often in the beds of rivulets, in shaded, rocky ravines. Sometimes
the fertile spikes are much crowded and much branched (var. com-
posita, Porter), giving the plant a singular appearance, as if, to use
the phrase of Mr. Canby, it had “run mad.”
36. Carex prasina, Wahl. (C. miliacea, Muhl.)
Norruampton; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); PaHrLApDELPHtIA, Dr. J.
Leidy; Cuester, (Fl. Cestr.); Berks, Dr. J. P. Hiester; Lan-
CASTER; SULLIVAN, A, H. Smith; Ex, McMinn.
37. Carex crinita, Lamarck.
Monroe; Norraamptron; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); CHESTER,
(FI. Cestr.); Lancaster; Eux, McMinn.
38. Carex crinita, Lam., var. gynandra, Schw. and Torr.
WAYNE, Garber; LACKAWANNA; LuzERNE, Garber; Monrog,
Pocono; ScHUYLKILL; NORTHAMPTON, Seidersville, R. G. Bechdolt;
CHESTER, Landenberg, Canby; Tioga, Garber; CLEARFIELD,
72 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
McMinn; Armstrone, Garber—Common in the mountains, but
rare elsewhere.
39. Carex Magellanica, Lamarck. (C. irrigua, Smith.)
Monrog, on the Tunkhannock, Dr. Traill Green, June, 1861.
Very rare. Its southern limit. Since found (in 1886) in the same
neighborhood, by Prof. Dudley, who writes, “The unusually obtuse
perigynia more resemble those of the Fuegian specimens figured by
Boott than those of any other specimens or figures I have access to.”
40. Carex limosa, L.
Wayne, Garber; Mownror, Pocono; Troca, Garber; Bucks,
Sellersville, Moyer.—Rare. Chiefly in sphagnous bogs on the
mountain—plateaus.
41. Carex virescens, Muhl.
Monrog, Knipe; NoRTHAMPTON, around Easton; Bucks, Fretz;
PHILADELPHIA, Diffenbaugh; De tAwarn, A. H. Smith; Monrt-
GoMERY, Dijfenbaugh ; LANCASTER; FRANKLIN.—Common.
42. Carex triceps, Michx. .
NortrHaMpron; Bucks; PHILADELPHIA; DELAWARE, Tinicum;
A. H. Smith; CuHerster, (Fl. Cestr.); Lancaster; FRANKLIN ;
Lycomine, A. H. Smith; Tioga, Garber; Buatr, Boecking. A
common and variable species.
43. Carex Smithii, Porter. (Olney, Evsice., fase. 1, no. 28.)
Glabrous, except the sheaths of the narrowly-linear leaves; culms
slender, erect, 1 to 2 feet high; fertile spikes 2 to 4, short-cylin-
drical, nearly sessile, approximate; perigynia globular, contracted
to a manifest point, crowded but not imbricated, smooth, a little
longer than the ovate, brownish, mucronate scales; akenes broadly-
pyriform, with very short, abrupt, inflexed tips—-CHEsTER; DeELa-
WARE, Tinicum and Pusey’s Woods, A. H. Smith.
In shape and appearance, the spikes, perigynia and akenes, and
the olive-green hue of the plant, at first sight, suggest C. granuwlaris
rather than C. triceps——It is named in honor of Mr. Aubrey H.
Smith of Philadelphia. Just beyond our borders, Mr. Canby re-
ports it as “very common in fields and woodlands around Wilming-
ton, Delaware,” and specimens from Gloucester, N. J. were sent me
by the late Chas. F. Parker. It is certainly a well-marked variety,
if not a distinct species.
44, Carex longirostris, Torrey,
Lycomrna, near Williamsport, McMinn; Monron, Water Gap,
Knipe; Bucks, Nockamixon Rocks, Garber. Rare and local. Its
southern limit.
1887. | NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 13
45. Carex arctata, Boott.
Monrog, Pocono, Dr. Traill Green; Sututvan, Chas. E. Smith;
Buarr, Boecking ; Exx, McMinn.—Rare. Its southern limit.
46. Carex debilis, Michx.
Monror, Pocono; NorrHameron; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.) ;
DeLawaRE, A. H. Smith; Cuester, (FI. Cestr.); LANCASTER,
Smithville Swamp; Crenrre, Bear Meadows, Lowrie; Huntrnc-
pon; Buair, Boecking; CLEARFIELD, McMinn; Mercer, Garber.
47. Carex debilis, Michx., var. pubera, Gray.
CENTRE, Bear Meadows, Lowrie; LANCASTER, Smithville Swamp.
Very rare and local.
48. Carex aestivalis, M. A. Curtis.
CuHester. (FI. Cestr.); Lackawanna, Carbondale, Garber ;
Suutuivan, ©. E. Smith; Tioga, Garber.—Rare.
49. Carex gracillima, Schweinitz.
LeuicH, Garber; NorrHampton; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.);
CuesTer, (FI. Cestr.); Lancaster; FRANKLIN; BuAtr, Boecking.
Common.
50. Carex Davisii, Schw. «& Torr.
NorruamptTon; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); Curstrr, (Fl. Cestr.) 5
LANCASTER ; FRANKLIN, Mercersburg.—Rare.
51. Carex grisea, Wahl.
Mownror, Water Gap, Knipe; NorrHampron, Easton; Bucks,
(Moyer’s Cat.); Cursrer, (FI. Cestr.); LANcAsTER; FRANKLIN ,
Buarr; AtiEecHEeNy, Knipe-—Common.
52. Carex glaucodea, Tuckerman.
NortHampron, Easton, Pen Argyl, Bethlehem, Fiot; Bucks,
Nockamixon Rocks, marshes near Quakertown ; DELAWARE, Pusey’s
Woods, A. H. Smith; Lancaster; Lycomrne, MceMinn.—I first
met with this species in a swamp near Smithville, Lancaster County,
in 1863. It struck me at once as new, and specimens, name and
distinctive characters were sent to Col. Olney, who informed
me that it had also been discovered near Amherst, Mass., and that
Prof. Tuckerman had just described it and his description would
soon appear in the Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts
and Sciences. Since then, it has been found at a number of stations.
in Eastern Pennsylvania and the neighboring States. In 1880, I
collected it on the summit of Roane Mtn., N. C.
53. Carex granularis, Muhl.
NortHAmpPtTon; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); CHEsrer, (Fl. Cestr.);
6
74 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
LANCASTER; FRANKLIN, Mercersburg —Common.
54. Carex granularis, Muhl., var. Haleana, ( C. Haleana, Olney. Exsiccat.
fase. ili, no. 14.)
Glabrous ; leaves broad and very glaucous; culms and peduncles
slender and weak ; fertile spikes much smaller and shorter; perigy-
nia less than half the usual size, rather narrowly ovoid, not globular.
NorrTHAMPTON, near Easton; LANCASTER, Smithville Swamp ;
ALLEGHENY, Knipe.——Outside of our limits, it has been collected
at Madison, Wisc., by 7. J. Hale, and in Montgomery County, Va.,
by Dr. Joseph Leidy.
55. Carex flava, IG.
CRAWFORD, Conneaut Lake, Garber.—The only station known.
56. Carex Gderi, Retz.
Erig, Presque Isle, Garber.—The only station known.
57, Carex pallescens, L.
Wayne, Garber ; LACKAWANNA, Carbondale, Garber ; CLrNToN,
MeMinn.—Rare. The southern limit of the species.
58. Carex Torreyi, Tuckerman.
Specimens of this rare species are reported as existing in European
herbaria, collected by Schweinitz near Bethlehem, Penna., and
named by him C. abbreviata. This may be correct, but among his
plants, now in possession of the Philadelphia Academy, there is a
sheet, at the top of which he has written “Carex lanosa—abbreviata,”
and at the bottom, “Bethlehem.” The eight or ten specimens on
the sheet, fastened down with paper-strips, are all C. vestita, Willd.
Although sought for in his old haunts, C. Torreyi has not yet been
rediscovered.
59. Carex conoidea, Schkuhr.
Monror, Water Gap, Knipe; NortHampvron ; Bucks; DELA-
WARE, Canby; Brrxs, near Reading; LANCASTER; FRANKLIN;
Lycomine, McMinn.
60. Carex oligocarpa, Schkuhr.
Nortruampton, Easton; Bucks, Sellersville, Fretz; LANCASTER,
on the Conestoga.—Rare.
The specimens of Dr. Fretz exactly agree with those of Dr. Sart-
well from Penn Yan, W. N. York, and I cannot see in them any
likeness to the southern narrow-leayed variety of C. grisea, to which
they have been referred.
61. Carex Hitchcockiana, Dewey.
NorrHampron, Easton; Lancaster; ALLEGHENY, Knipe.
Rare.
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA, 75
62 Carex laxiflora, Lamarck.
Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); Lancaster; Buatr, Lowrie.
63. Carex laxiflora, Lam., var’. stylofiexa, Boott.
Leuicu, Garber; NorrHampron, Bethlehem; Bucks, Garber ;
Berks, Neversink Mtn.; DrELAwarg, Tinicum, A. H. Smith—Rare.
64. Carex laxiflora, Lam., var. patulifolia, Carey.
Monrog, Water Gap, Knipe; NorruamMpPrTon ; LANCASTER ;
Huntinapon ; ALLEGHENY, Knipe.
65. Carex laxiflora, Lam., va. intermedia, Boott.
NortHampton; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); FRANKLIN, LUZERNE,
Garber; Lycomrine, McMinn; Mercer, Garber.
66. Carex laxiflora, Lam., var. striatula, Carey.
NortHampron; Bucks, (Moyer’sCat.); DELAWARE, Diffenbaugh;
LANCASTER.
67. Carex laxiflora, Lam., var. latifolia, Boott.
Bucks, Nockamixon Rocks; LANCAsTER; ALIEGHENY, Garber.
68. Carex retrocurva, Dewey.
NortHampron; Bucks, Moyer; LANCASTER; FRANKLIN; CEN-
TRE, Boecking—Rare.
69. Carex digitalis, Willd.
NortHampton; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); DreLAwareg, Dr. G.
Smith; Cuester, (Fl. Cestr.); Lancaster; Troca, Garber;
CLEARFIELD and Ex, McMinn.
70. Carex platyphylla, Carey.
Monror, Water Gap, Knipe; Bucxs, Nockamixon Rocks;
CuestTerR, Black Rock Tunnel, Diffenbaugh ; LANCASTER; SULLI-
LivAN, C. E. Smith; Crmnrre, Boecking; ALLEGHENY, Knipe.
Rare.
The C. platyphylla of Darlington’s Flora Cestrica is probably
C. laxiflora, Lam.
71. Carex Careyana, Torrey.
ALLEGHENY, Knipe.—F rom one station only.
72. Carex plantaginea, Lamarck.
Bucks, Nockamixon Rocks; CHrsrrer, near Pheenixville, Mar-
tindale ; SULLIVAN, on the Loyalsock, C. E. Smith ; Buatr, Lowrie;
CLEARFIELD, McMinn; ALLEeGuENy, Knipe—Rare and local.
73. Carex polymorpha, Muhl.
Mownroer, Pocono; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); LANcAsTER, Smith-
ville Swamp; Cuinron, MeMinn.—Rare and local.
74, Carex tetanica, Schkuhr.
Monror, Water Gap, Knipe; NortHampron, Easton; Bucks,
76 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [ 1887.
(Moyer’s Cat.); LancAstER; FRANKLIN.
75. Carex tetanica, Schkuhr, var. Canbyi. (C. panicea, L., var. Canbyi,
Olney, Exsice. fase. ii, nos. 24 and 25.)
Taller, erect and more robust than the type. The fertile spikes
and perigynia larger. In the last edition of Gray’s Manual, it is
placed under C. panicea, 1., but Mr Bailey makes it identical with
C. Meadii, Dew., from which it differs in its blunt scales and habit
of growth.
"6. Carex tetanica, Schkuhr, var. Carteri.
Lancaster, New Texas, J. J. Carter, June, 1862.—Glabrous, 15
to 20 inches high; staminate spikes on shorter stalks; pistillate
spikes 2 to 3, oblong, erect, all staminate at the apex; lower bract
equalling the culm; perigynia ovoid, obtuse, straight or straightly
curved above, not pointed, twice the length of the blunt scales.—
Named for the discoverer.
77. Carex Meadii, Dewey.
Bucks, Dr. I. S. Moyer—vVery rare. It exactly accords with
Western specimens received from Dr. Mead and Mr. Bebb.
78. Carex Crawei, Dewey.
Cuinton, McMinn.—The only station known.
79. Carex aurea, Nutt., var. androgyna, Olney.
Erie, Presque Isle, Garber.—The only station known.
80. Carex eburnea, Boott.
NorrHamprTon, near Easton.—On shaded limestone rocks; in
dense mats, and abundant. The only station known.
81. Carex pedunculata, Muhl.
Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); Berxs, Dr. J. P. Hiester ; LANCASTER;
FRANKLIN; SuLiivan, C. E. Smith; Jerrerson, McMinn; Erte,
Presque Isle, Guttenberg.—Rare.
82. Carex Pennsylvanica, Lamarck.
Norruampron; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); Curster, (FI. Cestr.) ;
LANCASTER; CLEARFIELD, Sandy Ridge, MeMinn.—Far less com-
mon than the next species.—In the specimens of Mr. Mc Minn, the
leaves are from 2} to 3 lines wide, and the scales and perigynia deep
chestnut-brown.
83. Carex varia, Muhl.
MonroeE; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); Berks, Difenbaugh; ScHuy.-
KILL; LANCASTER; FRANKLIN; SULLIVAN, C. E. Smith; Bate,
Lowrie; CLEarRrretp, McMinn.
84, Carex Emmonsii, Dewey.
Norrnampron ; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); PHtLADELPHIA; LAN-
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 77
CASTER; ALLEGHENY, Knipe.
$5, Carex nigro-marginata, Schweinitz.
NorrHamprton, Seidersville, R. G. Bechdolt: Bucks, J. A. and
H. F. Ruth—Rare and local.
86. Carex umbellata, Schkuhr.
NorruHampron; Bucks; Carson, Garber; Lycomine, A. H.
Smith; PataApELpHIA, Manayunk, C. E. Smith; Lancaster,
Chickies——On dry rocks and hillsides. Not common.
87. Carex pubescens, Muhl.
Norruampton; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); DrLaware, Dr. G.
Smith ; CHESTER, (FI. Cestr.); Berks, Dr. J. P.Hiester ; LANCASTER;
CLEARFIELD and EK, McMinn.
88. Carex Willdenovii, Schkuhr.
NortHampton; Bucks, Nockamixon Rocks; LANcAstTER; Ly-
cominG, A. H. Smith—Rare.
89. Carex Steudelii, Kunth.
LANCASTER, on the Conestoga; DAupury, near Harrisburg,
Garber; ALLEGHENY, Knipe.—Rare.
90. Carex polytrichoides, Muhl.
Monror, Water Gap, Knipe; NorrHampron; Cuester, (Fl.
Cestr.); LANCASTER; FRANKLIN; SULLIVAN, C. E. Smith; Hunt-
INGDON.—Common, in wet meadows.
91. Carex chordorhiza, Ehrhart.
TioGa, Marsh Farm, near Wellsborough, Garber, 1869.—Very
rare. The only station known. Its southern limit.
92. Carex conjuncta, Boott.
PHILADELPHIA, on the Schuylkill, Canby.—No other station known.
98. Carex stipata, Muhl.
Wayne, Garber ; NorrHampron ; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); PHtt-
ADELPHIA, Diffenbaugh; CHEsTER, (Fl. Cestr.); LANCASTER;
Suxuivan, C. E. Smith; Centre, Boecking; Huntincpon; ALLE-
GHENY, Knipe.—One of our most common and abundant species.
94. Carex teretiuscula, Gooden.
Tioca and CrawFrorpb, Garber.—Rare.
95. Carex teretiuscula, Gooden., var. ramosa, Boott.
Lancaster, Dillerville Swamp; Centre, Boecking—Rare.
96. Carex vulpinoidea, Michx.
NortTHampron, Bucks; LANCASTER; FRANKLIN; TIOGA,
Garber; Huntinepon ; Biatr.—Exceedingly common and very
variable.
78 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
97. Carex alopecoidea, Tuckerman.
CLEARFIELD and ELx, McMinn, 1868.—Very rare.
98. Carex disticha, Hudson.
Erte, Presque Isle, Garber.—No other station known.
99. Carex tenella, Schkuhr.
Troaa, Garber; E.x, McMinn.—Probably not infrequent in high
mountain-bogs, along our northern border.
100. Carex rosea, Schkuhr.
Monrogr, Knipe; NoRtTHAMPTON, Easton; LANCASTER; FRANK-
LIN.
101. Carex rosea, Schk., var. radiata, Dewey.
Wayne, Garber ; Monror, Water Gap, Knipe; Bucxs, (Moyer’s
Cat.); Cuesrer, (FI. Cestr.); LAncAsTER; FRANKLIN; CLEAR-
FIELD, McMinn.—Common.
102. Carex rosea, Schk., var. retrofiexa, Torrey.
Wayne, Garber; NorrHampton, Easton; LANcAsTER.—Rare.
108. Carex sparganioides, Muhl.
NorrHampton; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); PHILADELPHIA, Diffen-
baugh; LANCASTER; FRANKLIN; ALLEGHENY, Knipe.
104, Carex Muhlenbergii, Schkuhr.
Monroe, Water Gap, Knipe; NorrHampron, Easton, Seiders-
ville, Bechdolt; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); CHrstrer, (Fl. Cestr.);
FRANKLIN; Huntinapon, Lowrie; Lycomina and CLEARFIELD,
McMinn; ALLEGHENY, Knipe.
105. Carex Muhlenbergii, Schk., var. enervis, Boott.
PHILADELPHIA, Woodlands, Canby.—Very rare.
106. Carex cephalophora, Muhl.
Monroe, Water Gap, Knipe; NorrHampron; Bucks; Pura-
DELPHIA, Leidy; LANCASTER; FRANKLIN; CLEARFIELD and ELK,
McMinn.
107. Carex cephalophora, Muhl., var. angustifolia, Boott.
Erte, Presque Isle, Garber.
108. Carex echinata, Murray, (C. stellulata, Gooden.), var. conferta,
Bailey.
Wayne, Garber; ScHUYLKILL, Broad Mtn.; Lycomrne,
McMinn; Lancaster, New Texas, J. J. Carter.
109. Carex echinata, Murr., va. microstachys, Boeckeler.
Mownror, Water Gap; Knipe; NorrHampron; Bucks, (Moyer’s
Cat.); Corstrer, (Fl. Cestr.); Berxs, near Reading; LANCASTER.
110. Carex canescens, L.
“Wayne, Garber; Monror, Pocono; ScHuYLKILL; SULLIVAN,
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 79
Lake Mtn., A. H. Smith; Jerrerson, McMinn.—Peat-bogs, in the
mountains.
111. Carex canescens, L., var’. alpicola, Wahl.
Monroe, Pocono, Dr. Traill Green; WAyNkE, Garber; CENTRE,
Bear meadows, Lowrie—Rarer than the type.
112. Carex trisperma, Dewey.
Wayne, Garber; Monror, Water Gap, Knipe; ScHuyLKILL;
Sutiivan, C. E. Snvith—F requent and abundant in mountain-bogs.
113. Carex bromoides, Schkuhr.
Monrog, Tannersville, Garber; NorrHampron; Bucks, Moyer;
CueEstER, (FI. Cestr.); FRANKLIN; SuLirvan, A. H. Smith;
HunNTINGDON; JEFFERSON, McMinn.
114, Carex Deweyana, Schweinitz.
SuLiivan, C. E. and A. H. Smith; Erte, Presque Isle, Garber.
Very rare.
115. Carex siccata, Dewey.
Nortuampton, Bethlehem, Fiot—The only station known.
116. Carex tribuloides, Wahl. CC. lagopodioides, Schk.);
Norruampton; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); CHrsrrer, (FI. Cestr.);
Lancaster; Tioca, Garber; Huntincpon; Buatrr, Lowrie—
Common.
117. Carex tribuloides, Wahl., var. cristata, Bailey.
NortHampron; LANcAsterR; Lycominec, McMinn; Huntinepon.
Scarcer than the type.
118. Carex scoparia, Schkuhr.
Monroe, Pocono; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); LANcAstER; Buarr,
Boecking; ALLEGHENY, Knipe—Very common.
119. Carex adusta, Boott.
Mowror, Pocono; LackKAWANNA, Carbondale, Garber; Norru-
AMPTON, Easton; Bucks, Moyer; VeNANGo, East Sandy Creek,
Garber.—Rare.
120. Carex straminea, Schkuhr.
NortHampron; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); Cursrer, (FI. Cestr.)';
LANCASTER; ‘FRANKLIN; BLAIR; CLEARFIELD, McMinn.—Very
variable.
121. Carex straminea, Schk., var. aperta, Boott.
Lycomrine, A. H. Smith; Etx, MeMinn.—Rare.
122. Carex alata, Torrey.
Monrok, Pocono Summit, on the D. and L. R: R—Not known
elsewhere.
80 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
Two more species have been assigned to our flora, but they lack
confirmation.
Mr. Bailey, in his Synopsis, makes the range of C. gynocrates ex-
tend into Pennsylvania, without mention of any station or collector.
It may be looked for in the northern tier of counties along the N.
York line.
Muhlenberg, in his Descriptio uberior Gramimum ete., p. 265.
under C. lagopus ?, which is C. Fraseri, Andrews, adds these words,
“Habitat in Tyger- Valley Pennsylvaniae, unde siccam habeo et vivam.”
Kin, the German gardener who collected in 8. W. Pennsylvania,
brought it home and his label reads thus, “ Deigher Walli in der
Wilternus.” Dr. Gray has shrewdly conjectured that by “Deigher
Walli,” or ‘lyger Valley, is meant Tygart’s Valley, which lies fur-
ther south, in Virginia. When the late Dr. Garber visited Fayette
and Greene counties, in the service of the College, he made, by my
direction, particular inquiry after a valley of that name, but no one
had heard of it Yet he discovered there, on our side of Mason
and Dixon’s line, Aristolochia Sipho, and, a little further north, in
the same range, occurs Pyrularia oleifera, so that it is not at all un-
likely, that, some day, this rare and most singular Carex will be found
lurking in one of the Jateral valleys or ravines along the western
slope of Chestnut Hill
The list above given comprises 98 species and 24 varieties—a goodly
number, which may be increased somewhat. The sending to him of
any new or rare species, or specimens of those more common, from
the counties not thoroughly explored, will be accounted by the au-
thor as a special favor, and duly acknowledged.
The following European species have been collected by Mr. Isaac
Burk on the ballast-grounds at Philadelphia—C. Davalliana, Lam.,
C. distans, L; C. hirta, L. and C. ornithopoda, With.
Easton, Penna., March 4th., 1887.
* A box containing the Carices of Muhlenberg has just been discovered in the
Herbarium of the Academy, Philadelphia, and the label attached to the specimens
of Kin’s collection places Tyger Valley “prope amnem Kenahway.”
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 81
MARCH 29.
The President, Dr. Lrtpy, in the chair.
Twenty-seven persons present.
The death of Pierre Munzinger, a member was announced.
The following were elected members :—
William P. Wilson, Richard B. Westbrook, Albert W. Vail,
George O. Praetorius and William Blasius.
Prof. W. K. Brooks of Baltimore was elected a correspondent.
The following was ordered to be printed :—
82 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
THE SUMMIT PLATES IN BLASTOIDS, CRINOIDS, AND CYSTIDS, AND
THEIR MORPHOLOGICAL RELATIONS.
BY CHARLES WACHSMUTH AND FRANK SPRINGER.
Messrs. Robert Etheridge Jun. and Dr. P. Herbert Carpenter,
have recently published, under the auspices of the Trustees of the
British Museum, a most important and valuable contribution to
palaeontological research, in the form of a memoir, which is in
effect a Monograph of the British Blastoids.* The work is marked
by a thoroughness and wealth of illustration, characteristic of the
scientific publications on special subjects issued under the patronage
of the British Goverment, which makes us wish that the facilities
offered by our own government in that direction might be a little
more extensive. The high reputation of the authors is such an
ample guarantee of scientific excellence in the execution of the
work, that it is scarcely necessary to do more than allude to the
fact of its appearence. The points as to which we should venture
to differ with the authors are but few; upon these, however, we
regret we find ourselves materially at variance with their views.
The whole of chapter IV, from p. 66 to 74 inclusive, is devoted
to a discussion of the summit plates and their morphological
relations. The authors undertake to prove that while the summit
plates in the Blastoids do not present, as a rule, any very definite
arrangement (p. 118), yet they exhibit a series of variations in
number and position, in some degree corresponding with a similar
but more extensive series of variations among the Palaeocrinoidea;
that both exhibit a transition from five closely united plates fully
covering the summit, to a set of six proximal plates surrounding a
central one. The six proximal plates are held by them to be the
homologues of the five oral plates of the Neocrinoidea—a theory to
which the division of the proximals into six or more has always
interposed a very serious difficulty. If such a transition from five
closely fitted plates to six or more around another could be
established, of course its tendency would be to diminish the diffi-
*Catalogue of the Blastoidea in the Geological Department of the British
Museum (Natural History), with an Account of the Morphology and Systematic
Position of the Group, and a Revision of the Genera and Species, By Robert
Etheridge Jun. and P. Herbert Carpenter, D. Sc., F. R. S., P. L. S.-4 to.—Pp. I-
XVI, 1-322; 20 plates. London. Printed by order of the Trustees, 1886.
PROC. ACAD. NAT. SCI. PHILADA, 1887. PL. IV.
WACHSMUTH & SPRINGER, SUMMIT PLATES OF BLASTOIDS ETC.
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 83
culty; but it remains to be seen how far the authors have succeeded
in proving it.
A covering of the summit openings in various genera has been
described by several writers. This has been generally considered
as representing the same structure in all these genera; whereas there
is to be found among the coverings, thus described, two distinct
structures, which are totally different from each other, and are
characteristic, so far as observed, of distinct groups of the Blastoidea.
The first of these of which any detailed account has been
attempted, was observed by Roemer in 1851, in Elaeacrinus
Verneuili,* which he described as having the summit plates closed
by a hexagonal central plate, surrounded by six others, four of
equal size and two smaller. Shortly afterwards Shumard,' in
describing his new species Pentremites Sayi, stated that “the central
opening is closed by minute, usually pentagonal and hexagonal
plates, arranged in a manner somewhat similar to those of Pentremites
(Elaeacrinus) Verneuili,’ and he added in a note:—“the same
structure occurs in Pentremites Norwoodi and P. melo Owen and
Shumard, of which I have fully satisfied myself from an attentive
examination of many specimens.”
In 1863, Dr. White, in a paper on the summit structure of
Pentremites, * confirmed the observations of Shumard as to Pentrenvites
Norwoodi, and stated that in this species the whole central space
between the summit tubes and the anal aperture “is overlaid with
an integument of microscopic plates, entirely covering the central
aperture, passing out between the bases of the tubes in a double
series of plates, and was evidently continued far down the central
grooves of the pseudambulacral fields.’ He also discovered in
P. stelliformis* a covering of the central summit aperture “essentially
the same as in P. Norwoodii,’ and he described it as consisting of
“five small plates, arranged like a five pointed star, with the points
touching each of the upper ends of the interradial plates, thus
completely covering the summit aperture.”
Figures of the summit plates of Giranatocrinus Norwoodi and
Orophocrinus ( Codonites) stelliformis were subsequently published by
Meek and Worthen, * confirming the observations of Shumard and
*Archiv f. Naturgesch., 1851. Jahrg. XVI, p. 378.
1 Palaeontology, in Swallow’s Geol. Surv. Mo. 1855, p. 186.
» Bost. Journ. Nat. Hist. 1863, Vol. VII, No. 4, p. 484.
3 Ibid. p. 487.
* Illinois Geol. Rep., Vol. V. Pl. IV, figs. 2a, 5.
84 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
White; and we ° in 1881 gave a figure of the summit covering in
Schizoblastus ( Granatocrinus) Sayi.
In 1858, Shumard ° described what he took to be a somewhat
similar covering in a specimen of Pentremites conoideus, which he
figured and described as having the central stelliform space (mouth)
“perfectly closed by six small, microscopic plates, a central one of
a pentangular form surrounded by five smaller pentagonal pieces,
which unite with the edges of the aperture and form a little dome.
The five ovarial openings are each, in like manner, closed, as
represented in the figure by six minute polygonal plates, so arranged
as to forma little elevation.” Shumard’s description of P. conoideus
was endorsed by Billings’ who copied his figure, but modified it by
adding a small pore at each of the five angles, through which, as he
thought, the ambulacra entered the interior.
The fact of the closure of the summit opening in the above
mentioned species, and in Pentremites generally, has on the other
hand been denied by Dr. Hambach,’? who states that the central
opening “was never closed by additional plates, as intimated by
some authors (Billings and Shumard), although specimens are
frequently found (and I have some in my collection) where it
appears as if the summit were closed by additional plates, which, on
close examination, however, prove to be Bryozoa or ovulum-—like
bodies.” In a subsequent paper he * says that Shumard’s original
specimen of P. Sayi, which was figured in the Missouri Report,
“proves to have only a covering of minute calc-spar crystals on the
summit, leavings of the surrounding matrix, which could easily be
removed by applying a moist camel’s hair brush to them;” and he
adds—‘“my specimens which show such a covering * * * prove that
the covering consists only of fragments of broken up pinnulae which
were washed into the ambulacral furrows and remained there.”
As to Hambach’s general statement that the central opening was
never closed by additional plates, he has undoubtedly been misled
by the condition of his specimens. We are certain that if he were
to examine the numerous specimens in our collection of Schizoblastus
Sayi, Granatocrinus Norwoodi, G. melo, Orophocrinus stelliformis,
5 Revision of the Palaeocrinoidea Pt. II, Pl. XIX, fig. 3. ma
6 Trans. St. Louis, Acad. Sci. 1858, Vol, I No. 2, p. 243.
1 Amer. Journ. Sci. 1869, Vol. XLVIII, p. 82.
2 Trans. St. Louis, Acad, Sci., 1880, Vol. IV, p. 150.
3 Trans. St. Louis, Acad., Sci., 1884, Vol. IV No. 3, p. 540.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 85
O. conicus, O. fusiformis, an undescribed Mesoblastus from New
Mexico—to say nothing of Elaeacrinus from various localities, and
of three different species—all having the central opening per-
fectly closed by plates, he would come to a different conclusion.
We have found Schizoblastus Sayi in especially good preservation,
with summit plates firmly attached and unincumbered by deposition
of fragments of any kind. It is by no means rare to find specimens
of this species, in which the summit plates and portions of the coy-
ering pieces are in place. They may be seen in several collections
in Burlington, and these parts may be vigorously brushed with the
stiffest bristles with entire safety. The same may be said of all the
above named species, and there can be no sort of question that a
plated covering does actually exist in all of them. ,
With regard to the type specimen of Pentremites conoideus, how-
ever, we are fully convinced that Hambach is right, and that his
definition of the so called plates described and figured by Shumard
as covering the center and ovarial openings, as “ovulum—like bodies,”
for which he was somewhat sharply ridiculed by Dr Carpenter * is a
perfectly correct statement. The species occurs abundantly at
Spurgen Hill, Ind. in a friable, light-colored oolitic limestone, which
is composed almost entirely of minute organisms, small bivalves,
Gasteropods, etc., and these are interspersed profusely with small
egg-shaped bodies of almost uniform size. Nearly every specimen
of Pentremites from that locality has some of these bodies exposed
at the openings, but we find nowhere any regularity in their arrange-
ment, and they are seen equally plain in much worn and weathered
specimens.
Prompted by a strong desire to examine Shumard’s type, the speci-
men from which his figure was made, we applied to Dr. Hambach
for the loan of it from the Museum of the Washington University
at St. Louis, and he forwarded it to us with a promptitude and court-
esy, for which he has our warmest thanks. The specimen is very
interesting, and shows clearly that Shumard’s figure is a fiction
The center appears to be closed, and also the spiracles, not by plates,
but by foreign particles such as we have described above. The
specimen has the appearance of considerable weathering; none of
the outlines are sharp, and the spiracles, which in good specimens
are markedly angular, are here almost round. In one of the spira-
cles only, the arrangement of the particles appears somewhat like
Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 5, Vol. VITI., 1881, p. 422.
86 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
Shumard’s figure. At a hasty glance there seem to be six pieces, a
central one surrounded by five others; but when examined under a
strong magnifier there appear two pieces in the center, and six sur-
rounding them. From this one spiracle, the arrangement of the
supposed plates in all the other openings was probably inferred, and
the figure made accordingly; for the arrangement of the so-
called plates at the four other openings is altogether different, and
very irregular. So we find at the anal opening a good sized Gaster-
opod beside other pieces.
The central opening is covered by a single, comparatively large,
elongate body, ovoid in form, which does not actually close the open-
ing, but rests inside of it, beneath the level of the deltoids, slightly
touching them. Its position is such that if it represented the sum-
mit structure, the food grooves could not have entered the peristome
This is also one of those foreign bodies to which we alluded, but its
surface is too much worn to say much about it.
Etheridge and Carpenter’ express some doubt of the correctness
of Shumard’s description as to the plates covering the spiracles,
although they take Hambach to task (pp. 68, 164) for disputing
the same description as to the covering of the central opening.
They allude, however, to White’s discovery of a plated integument
over the anal opening in Orophocrinus stelliformis, which we are
able to confirm. This covering we have found well preserved, not
only in O. stelliformis, but also in two new species which we de-
scribed for Vol. VIII. of the Illinois Report now in prepara-
tion. In all cases where we found this structure intact, it lies below
the level of the deltoid through which the aperture penetrates, and
is composed of a large number of small, irregular pieces without any
visible opening.
We do not mean to say that the peristome and spiracles were not
covered by plates in P. conoideus, but we do assert that there was
no such covering as figured by Shumard. Even in the shape of the
spiracles his figure is totally erroneous. He represents them as very
regularly pentangular, so as to receive the five supposed plates neatly
filling the angles, and as surrounding a central one, one of their sides
facing the central opening instead of an angle. The fact is, however,
the spiracles are not pentangular but quadrangular, somewhat un-
equally diamond-shaped with sides slightly curving, the outer angle
obtuse, conforming to, and in fact formed by, the slope of the side
1 Catalogue of the Blastoidea, p. 69
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 87
pieces of adjacent ambulacra. The opposite angle toward the centre is
acute, and is occupied by a shallow groove which projects in form of a
lip toward the center. This form of the opening is remarkably con-
stant in all the specimens of this species, and is characteristic not
only of the genus Pentremites but also of Pentremitidea. That in
Pentremites a considerable portion of the spiracles was closed by
plates of some kind, we think quite probable, but the structure was
certainly very different from that described by Shumard.
In 1850, Owen and Shumard * discovered a peculiar summit struct-
ure in Pentremites in a specimen of P. Godoni, which they described
as a “conical covering of small plates.” In 1858 Shumard? ob-
served a similar structure in P. sulcatus, of which he gave the fol-
lowing account. “In this fossil there rises from the center of the
summit a little pyramid with five salient and five retreating angles,
the salient angles being directly opposite the extremities of the inter-
radial pieces, while the retreating angles correspond to the center
of the pseudo-ambulacral fields. The base of this little pyramid
is joined to the superior edges of the pseudo-ambulacral fields
so as to completely roof in the buccal and ovarial apertures. It con-
sists of about fifty pieces, arranged in ten series; the first or exterior
ones in each series being of a triangular form, the others elongated
quadrilateral. ‘Two series of pieces stand over each ovarial aperture,
those of one side uniting with their fellows of the opposite side at
the salient angles of the pyramid.”
No further attention was paid to this structure until 1884, when
Hambach* proposed to amend Shumard’s description by adding
that this cone-shaped body “consists of little tubes running parallel
with each other and roofing in the summit of the calyx in a con-
ical shape (but not the central opening.) They protude through
the same apertures in which the hydrospires terminate; there are
about five of these tubes to each aperture, which seem to correspond
with the plicas of the hydrospiric sac.” He concludes that these
tubes extend down into the interior of the calyx, and he takes them
“to be the ovarian tubes.”
We can confirm Hambach’s observation as to the existence of
elongate pieces having the external appearance of tubes placed side
by side, though we do not concur in his inference of a connection
1 Journ. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phil., Vol. II. Pt. I, p. 65
2Trans. St. Louis Acad. Sci., Vol. I, No. 2, p. 244.
1 Trans. St. Louis Acad.Sci. 1884,Vol. II, No. 3, p. 541
88 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
with his so-called “ovarian tubes,” for we have been unable to find
any evidence that they pass into the calyx, or that they are longi-
tudinally perforate.
We have been so fortunate as to obtain a large series of specimens
exhibiting the structure under consideration in more or less perfec-
tion in several species, and we are thereby enabled to present a
somewhat fuller description of its nature. We have observed it
in P. sulcatus in 2 specimens ; P. Godoniin 2 specimens ; P. pyriformis
in 4 specimens; P. elegans in 19 specimens; P. cervinus in 3 speci-
mens; and P. abbreviatus in 5 specimens, in all conditions of presery-
ation.
It consists in most of them of ten series of pieces—that 1s five double
series, going out in salient angles toward the extremities of the inter-
radial pieces (deltoids)—while in other species the series seem to be
composed of more than two rows, and they are not so regularly ar-
ranged as in species with only two series. The pieces are located
at both sides of, and apparently within, the so called spiracles.
They are, as clearly shown in perfect specimens, not plates but elon-
gate, tapering spines, closely packed together, comparatively robust,
with a more or less obtusely quadrangular and sometimes, perhaps
triangular section, usually curving a little at the tips toward the
center. They vary in length, the outer ones being the shortest,
those toward the center the longest. We have been unable to dis-
cover anything like transverse sutures or longitudinal perforations,
and they probably consist of a single solid piece. -Although limited
to the spiracles, their tips are generally drawn together so as to form
a kind of roof over the central opening, while if standing erect they
would leave a spaceinthe middle. The spines apparently have nocon-
nection whatever with the ambulacra ; the side pieces run out and dis-
appear at the spiracles, forming in fact their outer border, and only
the food grooves pass in between them to the peristome. Whether
the spines cover the spiracles directly, or rest upon independent
plates, we cannot say positively, but we are inclined to think that
the latter may be the case, and the plates bearing them are set in
around the inner margin of the spiracles, so as to cover the greater
part of the opening, leaving perhaps a shallow channel passing
toward the center over the lip which we have described above.
That the spines, or plates bearing them, extended only over a
part of the so-called spiracles, is strongly indicated by the condition
of a very interesting specimen of the type of Pentremites symmetricus
Hall, from Chester, Ill., in which it seems as if the whole pyra-
.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 89
mid and the covering pieces along the ambulacra, at least near the
mouth, were intact and in place when the animal was deposited.
It is enveloped in a fine grained silicious mud, fine enough to pass
through the smallest opening, and to leave a cast of all cavities.
In this specimen there appears over the actinal center a small round-
ed knob, from which pass out radially, along the upper part of the
food grooves, delicate string-like impressions of the inner part of the
closed groove. From the inner angles of the spiracles, and passing
over the lip-like projections at those angles, are small elevated
rounded ridges connecting with the central knob, while the other
portion of the spiracle is depressed sufficiently to receive a good sized
set of plates. Considering that the parts composed of this fine mud
are the counterparts of open spaces as they existed when the speci-
men was imbedded—all plates and spines being removed by disinte-
gration after it weathered out of the matrix—we may infer that there
was at the inner angle of the so-called spiracle a small channel or
opening, which probably served as the true spiracle, while the re-
mainder of the aperture—which in this view of the case would repre-
sent a mere break in the test—was all covered. At the posterior
opening the mud mould occupies a larger space, indicating a larger
opening ; otherwise we are not able from our specimens to give any
special account of the anal opening; neither can we observe any
special difference in the arrangement of the spines about the pos-
terior opening from that of the others.
The shape and construction of the spiracles in Pentremitidea is
very similar to that of Pentremites, and we should not be surprised
to find its summit surmounted by a similar structure. We fully
agree with Etheridge and Carpenter in placing these two genera in
the same family, but we are not so sure as to Mesoblastus, which we
think might be placed more appropriately with Schizoblastus and
Cryptoblastus.
The condition of the central opening in Pentremites gannot be
accurately determined from any of our specimens, but we have
distinctly seen that it is covered by several plates, independent of the
roofing by spines.
The food grooves, which pass out between the spines at the re-
treating angles of the cone, are vaulted over by two rows of cover-
ing pieces which are alternately arranged. These pieces close the
central groove of the ambulacrum, whence they branch off so as to
cover also the lateral grooves toward the pinnules. The plates cov-
7
90 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
ering the side grooves, which are arranged as regularly as those of
the main grooves, have been traced by us as far as the fifth side
pieces, but may have extended farther down. Th spite of their
small size, the plates are very distinct in our specimens, those of the.
upper row resting closely against the spines.
Messrs. Etheridge and Carpenter have given two fioaee showing
the summit of Pentremites in two different conditions of preservation,
both of them from specimens belonging to us. The first figure of P.
sulcatus, (Pl. I, fig. 8.), gives a somewhat incorrect impression of the
external appearance of the pyramid, owing to. the fact that the
spines composing it have been irregularly broken off a little way
above their bases, so that what there appear as plates are really the
cross sections of the spines. The fracture, however, is not regular,
nor at right angles to the long dimension of the spines, so that the
figure does not correctly represent either the real form of the cross
sections, or their relative positions. We may observe also that the
figure does not give the central portions. By applying a little ani-
line coloring matter we have been able to see the sutures indicating
the broken ends of spines, but the fracture is so irregular that the
arrangement cannot be distinguished. In their other figure on PI,
V, fig, 28., which gives a good idea of the form and character of
the spines composing the pyramid, some of the pinnules are pre-
served overlapping the spines and resting upon them, showing in
marked contrast the difference between the two structures.
After quoting and commenting upon Shumard’s and Hambach’s
descriptions of the pyramid in P. sulcatus, and haying before them
the original specimens represented in the above mentioned figures,
Etheridge and Carpenter! give their intrepretation of the facts as
follows:
“Mr. Wachsmuth has sent us a fine specimen, which may per-
haps throw some light on this difficult question, (Pl, I, fig. 8.) The
peristome and spiracles are almost completely covered by what seems
to be the base of the little pyramid described by Shumard.” The
upper part of the pyramid described by Shumard and Hambach
“seems to us to be constructed by the proximal pinnules, as in the
specimen represented on PI. V, fig. 28. In Mr. Wachsmuth’s ex-
ample of P. sulcatus, however, these proximal pinnules are not pre-
served, and the angles of the pyramid extend outwards towards the
pointed ends of the visible parts of the deltoids. At two of these
angles there seem to be indications of a double series of plates above
1 Catalogue of the Blastoidea, p, 70.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 91
b)
the spiracles.” They “have little doubt that this is fundamentally
the same structure as was seen by both Shumard and Hambach.”
According to the latter author, there are “about five” of the sup-
posed tubes to each spiracle ; while Shumard says that two series of
pieces stand over each opening, and except in the anal interradius
this seems to be the condition of Mr. Wachsmuth’s specimen also.
But we do not think that the pieces have the tubular nature which
Hambach assigns to them; for we doubt whether they are more
than the proximal pinnules grouped around the peristome as shown
in our Pl. V, fig. 28.”
In their explanation of the plate, this figure is said to be a “ra-
dial view of a decorticated specimen, with the pinnules rising above
into a kind of dome.” No allusion is made to any difference be-
tween the bundles of jointed pinnules which fall over the summit
from each side, and the set of apparently rigid, erect and jointless
appendages which are seen between them. Nor do the authors any-
where in the text appear to recognize any such difference, although
it is to us quite apparent, both in the figure and in the specimen
which was before them.
After arriving at this as a probable interpretation of the struct-
ures observed by Shumard and Hambach and figured by themselves,
and dissenting from Hambach’s supposition, that the so-called tubes
pass down into the interior of the calyx, they arrive at this further
conclusion: “We are much more inclined to think that we have
here to deal with an extension of the smaller system of summit
plates, which occur in other Blastoids. In Granatocrinus and Elae-
acrinus only the peristome appears to be covered, (PI. VII, figs, 4.
11.15; Pl. XVIII, fig. 16), except perhaps for the anal aperture in
G. Norwoodi; while Orophocrinus and Stephanocrinus have a group
of plates around the anal aperture (Pl. XIX, fig. 9). In Pentre-
mites conoideus the other four spiracles are perhaps also closed by
plates ; and except in the larger size and abundance of the plates it
is no great advance from this condition to that which we have seen
in Pentremites sulcatus (Pl. I, fig. 8.), but we await further informa-
tion.”
The supposed closure of the spiracles by plates in Pentremites
conoideus proves to be unsupported by the facts. A correct under-
standing of the nature of the pyramid surmounting the vault in
Pentremites sulcatus and allied species will, we think, fully demon-
strate that this structure, which probably existed in all Pentremites,
is a totally different thing from the covering of the anus in Oropho-
92 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
crinus, Stephanocrinus or Granatocrinus. In the three latter types,
the so-called covering does not extend to the spiracles, but consists
apparently of a sort of moveable plates, by means of which in va-
rious ways the anal aperture could temporarily be opened or closed
as its functions required.
The views expressed by Etheridge and Carpenter that these spine-
like pieces forming the pyramid are nothing but the proximal pin-
nules, cannot, in our opinion, be sustained by any of the evidence.
There are very serious objections to it :—
1. They consist of a single piece throughout their entire length,
whereas pinnules are composed of small joints. The specimens all
show this distinction well, and it may be clearly seen in Eth-
eridge and Carpenter’s Pl. V, fig. 28.
2. They have no ventral groove, and taper to a point; while
pinnules are nearly uniform throughout, and especially do not
taper perceptibly from their bases.
3. They are more robust than the pinnules in the same specimen,
and shorter—the pinnules passing beyond their tips.
4. The best preserved specimens show that the pinnule sockets end
at the spiracles where the two rows of adjoining ambulacra come to-
gether in a point. The spines, however, seem to begin where the
pinnules end, and extend from there inward, the clusters widening
toward the center so as to form the retreating angles at the base
of the pyramid.
5. The spines are interradial and interambulacral, and as such
may belong to an interambulacral system, which perhaps is unre-
presented in other groups of the Blastoids, but certainly form no
part of the ambulacral system.
Whatever the spines in Pentremites may be, or represent mor-
phologically, we think it will have to be conceded that they are not
“proximal pinnules,” and not comparable to the plates covering the
anus of Orophocrinus, Stephanocrinusgor Granatocrinus.
On page 73, Messrs. Etheridge and Carpenter attempt to establish
a series of variations in the summit plates of the Blastoids, “similar
to that which can be traced among the Palaeocrinoids. The sim-
plest form of summit which occurs in any Blastoid is that presented
by Stephanocrinus. The peristome is completely closed by the five
triangular plates of the so-called proboscis.” They state that Hall,
in his diagram of the structure of the summit in Elaeacrinus elegans*
115th. Rep. N. Y. St. Cab. Nat. Hist. 1862, p. 158.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 93
figures only five plates of equal size; and they add :—“ These five
plates of Stephanocrinus and Elaeacrinus have exactly the same re-
lation to the peristome and ambulacraas the oral plates of a Neocri-
noid, and we do not see how their mutual homology can well be dis-
puted.” On page 74 they continue: “The difference between
Elaeacrinus elegans or Stephanocrinus and E. Verneuili, as described
by Roemer, is very much the same as that between Culicocrinus
and the simplest form of Platycrinus. Stephanocrinus, like Culico-
crinus, has but five plates in the vault; while in E. Vernewili there
are at least seven, viz.: one orocentral, four proximals of equal size,
and two smaller ones on the anal side.” They allude to White’s
description of the summit of Ovrophocrinus stelliformis as consisting
of five small plates ete., which they say is “‘just as in Stephanocrinus
and in Elaeacrinus elegans’—though they add that their arrange-
ment does not seem to be very constant. On page 75, they speak
of the summit of Granatocrinus Norwoodi varying in a similar man-
ner, and of a “somewhat less regular arrangement” in Schizoblastus
Sayi.
It thus appears that their conclusion that the plates of the vault
in Blastoids “rarely exhibit any definite arrangement,”(p. 118) and
that there is a series of variations in the summit plates of the Blas-
toids similar to, and to some extent parallel with, those which they
assume to exist in Palaeocrinoids, is based on the presence of five
plates in Stephanocrinus ; the assumption of five plates in Elaeacrinus
elegans and Orophocrinus stelliformis, in contrast with seven plates
in E. Verneuili; and variability in the number and arrangement
of plates in the summit of Granatocrinus Norwoodi and Schizoblastus
Sayi.
It is somewhat unfortunate for the validity of this speculation
that Stephanocrinus cuts so important a figure in it, as it has since
been discovered to be not a Blastoid at all, but a brachiate Crinoid;
a fact,’ it is proper to say, which is noticed by the authors in
their preface. This genus, therefore, must be eliminated from among
the premises on which the argument is built, and the “simplest
form” must be looked for elsewhere. Let us see how far the others
will stand the test of examination.
Elaeacrinus elegans was described by Hall? under Nucleocrinus,
and in his specific description,—and not simply in his generic diag-
1 Revision of the Palaeocrinoidea, Pt. III, p. 282, etc.
215th, Rep. N. Y. St. Cab. Nat. Hist. 1862 .p. 147.
94 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
nosis, as stated by Etheridge and Carpenter—he says the summit is
“oecupied by five or more small plates.” In the diagram, on page
153 of the work cited, the summit is represented as divided into five
equal and similar areas by the meeting of lines prolonged from the
middle of the ambulacra. It is apparent that no attempt was made
to give the exact form or number of those plates. They are not let-
tered as the other plates are, and no mention is made of them in the
explanation of the figure; nor does Hall anywhere seem to have at-
tached sufficient importance to the summit plates to give a descrip-
tion of their shape, position, arrangement, or relative size.
' In order to satisfy ourselves as to what the real facts are, we ap-
plied to Prof. R. P. Whitfield for the loan of the type specimen of
E. elegans showing the summit plates, now in the collection of the
American Museum of Natural History in New York City. Prof.
Whitfield, with his usual kindness, for which we are under renewed
obligations to him, promptly sent us the original specimen from
which fig. 14, of Pl. I, as wellas the diagram on page 153 of the
15th Report was made; and in his letter transmitting it he says:
“T fear you will not see clearly the arrangement of the plates.
There are more than five plates—probably eight”. The italics are his.
By applying water, colored with aniline, and then moderately brush-
ing the surface so as to remove the coloring matter except from the
sutures, we were enabled to distinguish the presence of a central piece
surrounded by seven others,—four large and uniform, and three
smaller ones at the posterior side (fig. 11.) This gives a summit
structure substantially the same as that of Elaeacrinus Vernewli,
(see Etheridge and Carpenter, Blast. Cat. p. 215).
We also applied to Dr. Barris for the loan of his specimens of
Elaeacrinus obovatus, and these, together with our own, gave us
eight specimens of this species, all having the summit in situ. The
four large proximals are readily recognized in most of them, but
only a single specimen enabled us to distinguish all the plates as
they are shown in fig. 12. In four others, the suture line between
the central plate and the small anal piece is seen as plainly as we
could wish, but there is no trace of a suture toward the smaller
proximals (fig. 13); while in the three remaining ones, including the
largest specimen, it appears as if the summit consisted of only five
plates (fig. 14.) There is, however, no variation in the form and
general outline ot the summit in any of these specimens. The sum-
mit in all of them rests posteriorly between the two halves of the
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 95
compound deltoid and against the intermediate large anal plate,
and in all of them the lower margin is perforated and occupied by
one half of the anal aperture, thus showing that in this species also
the summit consists primitively of eight pieces, of which the suture
lines became partially obliterated.
In the type specimen of Elaeacrinus meloniformis, which Dr.
Barris was kind enough to send us also, the arrangement of the
summit plates is the same as in EF. obovatus, and we clearly distin-
guished the small anal plate.
It thus appears that in the known species of El/aeacrinus the
summit plates consist of a central plate surrounded by six or more
proximals, and that in no case do they consist of five primitive
plates; so that the “simplest form of summit’’—five plates only
has not been found in Elaeacrinus. The assumed parallelism of
differences between EF. elegans and E. Verneuili among the Blastoids,
and Culicocrinus and the simplest form of Platycrinus among the
Crinoids, encounters a very serious interruption in consequence—
unless, indeed, it should turn out that there is a parallelism in these
cases of an altogether different character from that contemplated by
the English authors.
The summit of Orophocrinus stelliformis was stated by White* to
consist of “five small plates arranged like a five-pointed star, with
the points touching each of the upper ends of the interradial plates.”
We do not doubt that Dr. White thought to observe such arrange-
ment, but we think it very probable that the condition of his speci-
men was such that he overlooked the central plate, which may
easily happen, as the sutures are often difficult to observe. Ina
large number of specimens we have never found a single one with
the summit composed of five plates only, or with a central plate
surrounded by five proximals. We found, however, that in speci-
mens of this species, as well in Granatocrinus Norwoodi and Schizo-
blastus Sayi, when the covering plates are in place, they often partly
overlap the summit plates, and in such cases the arrangement of the
latter cannot be distinctly observed. When the covering pieces are ab-
sent, and the summit plates alone are intact, as in several of our speci-
mens, the arrangement is quite regular. We have madea careful ex-
amination of a large series of specimens, not only of O. stelliformis but
also of our new species O. fusiformis and O. conicus, in which the sum-
mit plates are more frequently preserved. In all of them there is a
1 Boston Journ. Nat. Hist. 1863, Vol. VIII, No. 4, p. 487.
96 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
central plate, surrounded by others, either six or seven. Even the
original of Etheridge and Carpenter’s figures 11 and 12 on PL. XV,
in our collection, upon the application of coloring matter to bring
out the sutures, proves to have a quite regular arrangement of the
summit plates, which the artist who drew the figures failed to detect.
“There are certainly not “five small plates,’ but a central plate
surrounded by six proximals.
According to our observation, therefore, of the best preserved
material known, the summit of O. stelliformis does not represent the
“simplest form,”’—“just as in Stephanocrinus.”
There remains only to consider Granatocrinus Norwoodi and
Schizoblastus Sayi, as to both of which we remark that there is often
presented much apparent irregularity and variability in the
arrangement of their summit plates. But we find that this is due to
the encroachment of the covering plates, which sometimes largely
overlap them, as is well shown by Ether. Carpenter’s Pl. VII, figs.
11 and 13. But in natural internal casts, in which we have the
impressions of the inner surface of the plates, they appear larger
and much more regularly arranged. Among a large number of
specimens we have failed to find a single example of a summit
closed by only five plates; while in a large proportion of them we
distinguished clearly a central plate surrounded by six or more
proximals. Whatever variations, however, of form and arrangement
of summit plates may be found to exist in these two species, we feel
warranted in asserting that the “simplest form” is not one of them.
On page 71, (Catal, of the Blastoidea), Messrs. Etheridge and
Carpenter say that “in 1877, Wachsmuth pointed out that a
definite arrangement of plates is more or less traceable in the vault
of many Palaeocrinoids. There is a single central plate, with five
or, more frequently, six others disposed interradially round it.”
It would naturally be inferred from this remark and the context,
not only that five proximals around a central plate is one recognized
condition in the vault of many Palaeocrinoids, but also that
Wachsmuth had so expressed himself:—whereas the fact is he said
nothing of the kind in the paper cited, but on the contrary spoke
only of “7 apical plates’”—a central, four large, and two small ones;
and this number, or a greater, has been insisted on by us as being
the almost universal rule.
In seeking for a transition or variation in the summit plates of
Palaeocrinoids, comparable to that which they assume to exist
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 97
among the Blastoids, they take the young stage of Adlagecrinus
(p. 72), as presenting “the simplest form of vault,” i. e. five plates
without any central; and Haplocrinus next, with a central piece and
five proximals, “neither Adl/agecrinus nor Haplocrinus having any
calyx interradials.” Culicoerinus is cited as having five large summit
plates resting on the calyx interradials, and without any central
piece. Then come Platycrinus and the Actinocrinidae as exhibiting
varying degrees of complexity, but having a central plate, which
they call an
also, they base a large part of their argument upon premises which
are by no means universally recognized, or are free from dispute. We
consider it far from being an established fact, that either Ad/agecrinus
or Haplocrinus—Culicocrinus will be considered later on—are
without calyx interradials.
As we have before stated, Etheridge and Carpenter maintain, and
it has been steadily insisted on by Dr. Carpenter since 1879, that
the proximal plates, surrounding ‘the central plate in Palaeo-
crinoids, their so-called “orocentral,” represent the five orals
of Neocrinoidea. This involves the assumption of a homology
between a set of plates covering the actinal center, which are five
in all stages of the Neocrinoids in which they exist, and a set of
plates which, when present in Palaeocrinoids consist of six or
more plates, which do not cover the actinal center, but which
enclose another structure that does. It is in order to get rid of some
of these difficulties that the authors attach so great importance to
the cases of Allagecrinus, Haplocrinus, Culicocrinus, Coccocrinus,
and Stephanocrinus, in which they undertake to point out a series
of five plates at the ventral side, as the representatives of six or more
proximals in Palaeocrinoids generally, and which at the same time
might be successfully homologized with the orals of the Neocrinoids.
In this connection they remark on page 73 :—
“Since the preceding paragraph was in type, we have received
the latest publication of Messrs. Wachsmuth and Springer,
according to whom the five plates which form the ventral pyramid
of Stephanocrinus are ‘calyx interradials,’ and cannot therefore be
homologous with the orals of a Neocrinoid. In making this
comparison Messrs. Wachsmuth and Springer seem to have altogether
overlooked the fact that Stephanocrinus has well developed calyx
interradials, namely, the deltoids. * * * The American authors
regard the deltoid pieces of the Blastoidea, and by implication
“oro-central,” surrounded by proximals. In this case
98 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [ 1887.
therefore those of Stephanocrinus, as homologous with the large
calyx interradials of the Cyathocrinidae, a view in which we
entirely concur, as we have explained on p. 10. But in applying
this name to the five plates which form the ventral pyramid and
cover the mouth of Stephanocrinus, and also of Haplocrinus and
Allagecrinus, as they do in their latest publication, they seem to us
to be going very much too far. We regard the five summit plates.
of all three genera as truly homologous with the orals of the
Pentacrinoid larva. They cover the mouth and the origin of the
ambulacra, just as the orals do in the Neocrinoid; and this relation
is not characteristic of the calyx interradials in any Pelmatozoon
whatever. It is only in the Cyathocrinidae and in the Blastoids
that these plates have any close relation to the mouth at all. But
they do not cover it and shut it off completely from the exterior as:
the summit plates of Stephanocrinus and Allagecrinus do.”
We have been more than once charged by Dr. Carpenter with
inaccurate statements as to his views, and in some cases with reason
as we have admitted; but we do not believe we have ever been
chargeable with anything so completely unfounded as the foregoing
criticism. It is based entirely upon the single remark of ours on
page 46 (Revision Palaeocr. Pt. II], that “the ventral pyramid in
Haplocrinus and Coccocrinus is composed of interradials and not of
orals, and the same may be said of Stephanocrinus.”** This was
written under the supposition, then entertained by ‘all Palaeontolo-
gists, perhaps with the exception only of Etheridge and Carpenter,
whose interpretation will be quoted presently, that Stephanocrinus
was constructed of only three ranges of plates, and we considered
the third row, constituting the whole portion from the coronal
processes inward, to be interradial plates. Messrs. Etheridge and
Carpenter’ in 1883, interpreted all plates, in common with the
deltoids of the Blastoids generally, and the interradials of the
Cyathocrinidae, as orals,—a view which they have since abandoned.
In the same paper—p. 239—they mention five plates in the summit,
composing, according to Hall, a central “proboscis,” and say that
they have “only seen this proboscis in one specimen,” and regard it
as “a vault of a few pieces covering in the peristome.” This shows
clearly that they did not themselves at that time consider these
*We even did not use the term “ca/yx interradials” in that quotation, we
simply spoke of the ‘‘zz¢erradials.”
1 Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist. Apr. 1888, pp. 225 to 246.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 99
“proboscis” plates as representing the orals, and, so far as we know,
they never afterwards, until the appearance of the Blastoid Catalogue,
gave any other interpretation of the inner ring of plates. If they
had regarded them as orals, it would have suggested the presence
of two rings of orals, the one within the other.
Subsequently we found reason to distinguish two rings above the
radials—the so-called orals or deltoids of Etheridge and Carpenter
and a series of summit plates—the so-called ‘“proboscis’—from a
specimen of S. gemmiformis; and we communicated this fact to Dr.
Carpenter as early as Dec. 17th 1885 with a diagram explaining it,
stating that, although summit plates in our specimen were not
preserved, such plates were probably represented in the species. We
also informed him that it was the third ring or deltoids, and not the
summit plates, which we took to be the homologues of the interra-
dials in Haplocrinus; and that the hypothetical plates closing the
summit we took to be represented in Haplocrinus by the central
plate. Atthesame time we applied to Prof. Whitfield for specimens
to ascertain the summit structure in S. angulatus. From these
specimens we at once found beyond all doubt that the plates of the
third row in S. angulatus, as well as in S. gemmiformis, do not extend
to the oral center, but are followed by five other plates—the so-
called “proboscis”—covering the mouth (fig. 3). Upon making
this discovery we promptly declared the latter to be the orals, and
advised Dr. Carpenter accordingly on January 9th 1886. *
Our statement, therefore, that the “ventral pyramid” in Stephanocri-
nus is composed of interradials, was made with reference to plates which
we then supposed to be a single element, extending to, but not
covering the oral center, and which Etheridge and Carpenter had
previously announced to be orals followed by vault pieces, but now
consider to be deltoids followed by orals. | When the authors assert
that we applied the name “calyx interradials” to the “plates which
form the ventral pyramid and cover the mouth of Stephanocrinus and
also of Haplocrinus,” we cannot help thinking that they are “going
very much too far.’ A similar erroneous statement was made by
Dr. Carpenter in March 1886+ and it has been a matter of consid-
*Tt is due to Dr. Carpenter to state here that he had privately communicated to
us, after Sect. I of Pt. III of our Revision was in print. that he regarded the inner
ring of Stephanocrinus as orals, and this led to our correspondence upon the
subject.
1Ann, and Mag. Nat. Hist., March, 1886, p. 282
100 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
erable surprise to us that in both these publications we should be
held up to criticism for a statement which we did not make in any
such form as their language would imply, and that the authors
should indulge in a general adverse comment upon our incidental
remark on Stephanocrinus, without the slightest intimation of the
very important additions to our former views consequent upon new
discoveries, which would have made our meaning entirely clear.
These were published in Part III, Revision of the Palaeocrinoidea,
pp. 282-290.
To represent us as arguing that the plates which we recognize as
calyx interradials “cover the actinal center,” or “cover the mouth
and the origin of the ambulacra,” seems to us very much like
setting up a man of straw for the pleasure of knocking him down.
For our whole argument in favor of a homology of the orals of the
Neocrinoid with the central plate in Palaeocrinoids, has been ex-
pressly put upon the ground that the latter plate covers the actinal
center ; and one of the strongest objections we have. constantly urged
against such a homology with the proximals, has been that they do
not (Rev. Pal. Pt. III, p. 53). Etheridge and Carpenter add in
continuing their criticism above noticed: “There is not a single
Crinoid known in which plates which are universally recognized to be
calyx interradials cover in the actinal center.” Of course not; and
we do not know of anybody who says they do. But on the other
hand it is equally true that there is not a single Palaeocrinoid known
in which the plates that are universally recognized as orals cover
the whole ventral surface; and upon this ground we might well contend
that if the plates which Etheridge and Carpenter consider to be
orals are really such, then Allagecrinus and Haplocrinus are Neo-
crinoids, in which from the larva to the adult, as a rule the whole
ventral surface is covered by actinal structures. Their statement
above cited, as to the homology of plates which “cover the mouth
and the origin of the ambulacra, just as the orals do in Neocrinoids,”
might be profitably applied to the case of Caryocrinus, as shown
by a number of excellent internal casts recently obtained from
Racine, Wisconsin. Caryocrinus has a large central piece, and
this is surrounded usually by eight plates, which are arranged in a
totally different manner from the so-called proximals of the Palaeo-
crinoidea. Three of them are radial, the others interradial, (figs. 6-
7). The interradial pieces alternate with the radial ones, one to
each side, except at the anal interradius where three smaller pieces
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 101
take the place of the single one at the two other sides. Like most
of the Cystidea, Caryocrinus has no true radials, although it has
well developed arms. The rays start from underneath the central
plate in a similar manner as they do in allied genera from under-
neath their quinque-partite oral pyramid; but the ambulacra, instead
of entering the surface at once, as in other groups, here remain sub-
tegminal until they enter the arms, following the medium line of
three radial plates, and branch (fig. 7) underneath them twice to
their respective arm openings. In this case, the central piece which
“covers the mouth and the origin of the ambulacra” must surely
represent the orals if any plate does, but not the plates which sur-
round it and cover, neither the mouth nor the origin of the ambu-
lacra. We should like to know by what process Messrs. Etheridge
and Carpenter will demonstrate the oral nature of either the radial
or interradial plates in this form.
We have already alluded to the great importance toward the estab-
lishment of Etheridge and Carpenter’s oral theory, of their proving
the existence both in Crinoids and Blastoids of a summit composed
either of five plates only, or of a central plate surrounded by five.
This is why the series of parallei transitions or variations in the
summit plates of the two groups is so strenuously urged in the
Blastoid Catalogue. But it seems to us that the authors have al-
together failed to point out a single instance in which five primary
plates cover the peristome among the Blastoids. The cases which
have been relied upon to prove such a condition, must be attributed
to incorrect observation or the want of sufficiently good material.
That occasionally in certain species of Elaeacrinus the central piece
is more or less coalesced with the proximals of the azygous side, and
these with one another so as to obscure the suture lines, as we have
shown in our illustrations figs. 12 to 14, cannot alter the case in
the least, as they are plainly visible in others, and without any
change in the general arrangement of the summit. Nor doesit seem
to us that the authors have been any more successful in showing
how among Palaeocrinoids the five large plates in Haplocrinus, cov-
ering the whole ventral surface except the oral pole, could have
been transformed in other groups of the Palaeocrinoidea into six
plates covering only a small space around the peristome. These five
plates in Haplocrinus occupy the same position, as the primary calyx
interradials of other groups, and especially resemble those of
Cyathocrinus and Stephanocrinus. (Compare figs. 2 to 5).
102 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
It may not be out of place to mention in this connection that in
Haplocrinus there appear radially between the five large ventral
plates, upon their lateral edges, five conspicuous grooves (figs. 4 and
5), which were regarded by Prof. Zittel (Handb. d. Palaeont, I, p.
347) as ambulacral furrows. Similar grooves exist in Cyathocrinus,
Stephanocrinus and other Inadunata along their interradials, and in
all of them the grooves are occupied by the ambulacra. The simi-
larity between these grooves, no doubt, induced Prof. Zittel to give
to those of Haplocrinus the same interpretation. Unfortunately,
however, the central plate of Haplocrinus, as plainly seen in our
specimens, does not occupy exactly the same level as the upper an-
gles of the five large plates, but lies (Fig. 4) below their level and
between them, just as if it were being pushed from within outward
so as to separate the five plates at the central space. The peculiar
position of the central plate demonstrates, we think beyond any
doubt, that the ambulacra of Haplocrinus could not have been ex-
posed upon this groove, but at the same time it appears to us that
these grooves, which occupy relatively the same position toward
surrounding plates and the peristome, and are formed in a similar
manner, must represent morphologically the same grooves, which
are occupied in higher developed types of this group by the ambul-
acra (fig. 3). Supposing that Haplocrinus, as we find it in the
fossil state, were but an embryonic stage of the species—the genus
has been regarded a permanent larval form of the group—we think
we might safely assert from the phylogeny of the Palaeocrinoidea
generally, that in the growing animal the central plate was pushed
outward so as to appear at a level with the five interradials; that
subsequently by the growth of the dorsal cup, and the widening of
the peristomial area, proximals appeared around the central piece ;
and that at last the ambulacra were pushed out to the surface to
occupy the radial grooves, which were present already in the young
Haplocrinus. The different stages to which we here have alluded
are well represented in palaeontological times throughout the Inad-
unata, and not only among them, but also among the Camarata
under very similar conditions.
The Camarata or Coadunata differ from the Inadunata in having
their proximal arm joints incorporated into the calyx by the up-
ward growth of interradials; while in the Inadunata the arms re-
main free from the first radial, and they have but one interradial
which is disposed ventrally. That all Camarata passed temporarily ~
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 105
in early life through the Inadunata stage, seems to us beyond dis-
pute, and we think we may assert that they were for a time in asimilar
condition to Haplocrinus, with one interradial plate disposed ven-
trally. Limiting our observations among the Camarata to the
Platycrinidae, we find, so far as we know, their simplest forms repre-
sented by the two early genera Culicocrinus and Coccocrinus, which both
have two rows of plates interradially disposed, the one resting with-
in the circlet of the other. In Culicocrinus,* if Miller’s figure is
correct, the first row of these plates consists of five rather large pieces,
one to each interradius, which connect laterally with the primary
and secondary arm plates, so as to make them radials and integral
parts of the calyx. Those of the second row which are triangular
meet laterally and close the center, apparently without any additional
plates.
Of Coccocrinus two species are known. Coccocrinus bacca has
three interradials in the first row, which have a strictly ventral posi-
tion, C. rosaceus apparently but one, which is more erect. In both
species the plates extend to the height of the third primary radials,
and probably higher. The inner row of plates is only known in C.
rosaceus, and these, like those of COulicoerinus, are subtriangular,
but, unlike them, do not connect laterally with one another, nor do
they meet in the center. There is a lateral slit between them
all the way to the arm openings, and at the center an open space,
which in the fossil is not filled by any further structures. In C. bacca,
as stated, the inner plates have not been preserved, but we scarcely
doubt that similar plates were present, for we find in a radial
direction between the outer plates of the first row, very conspicuous
slits, which correspond to those of C. rosaceus.
The outer plates, in the two genera, were regarded by Carpenter
as calyx interradials, the inner ones as orals, and these he took to
be the homologues of the five large ventral plates of Haplocrinus,
and of the proximals in other groups.
We admit that Coccocrinus and Culicocrinus probably are morph-
ologically in a similar condition, and represent early stages in the
phylogeny of the Palaeocrinoidea like Al/agecrinus and Haplocrinus,
*Through the kindness of Prof F. Roemer, we received a most excellent
gutta percha cast of a Cu/tcocrinus with arms, from a mould in the Mineralogical
Museum of Breslau, but not showing the ventral covering. Miller’s original fig-
ures of the ventral covering, Lethea Geognostica of 1855, Taf. VIII, figs. 1 and
2, we are informed are much restored, and the arrangement of the plates, as there
given, not altogether reliable.
104 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887,
but we doubt if this is the case in the sense Dr. Carpenter suggests.
The two former are Camarata, and as such should be provided with
more than one row of interradials, which they would not possess if
the inner plates were orals.
Based upon palaeontological evidence, we think, we may rea-
sonably suggest that in the developmental history of Culicocrinus,
at the close of the Inadunata stage, the first row of interradials
opened out to connect the proximal arm plate with the calyx, and
that a second ring formed to take the place and functions of the
first, closed the center.
Coccocrinus forms a connecting link between Culicocrinus and
Platycrinus. Probably it has one or more summit plates, and the
ambulacra disposed between the interradials.
In Platycrinus, the inner interradials, which in Coccocrinus are
yet placed at a level with the dorsal cup, are considerably more
raised. In consequence thereof we find in this genus much larger
spaces between the interradials, centrally as well as laterally, and
hence better developed summit plates and larger and heavier cover-
ing pieces. Of the summit pieces probably the central plate
appeared at first—this is indicated by the phylogeny of the group—
and the proximals appeared later, filling the vacancies, which
gradually had formed around the central plate.
In this sketch we have not added anything that is not well
sustained by the phylogeny of this group, or is not in accordance
with the developmental ‘history of the Palaeocrinoidea generally-
Throughout this order, when summit plates are exposed at all, they
occupy a comparatively small space around the peristome, and this
space increases in width in palaeontological times. In all Palaeo-
crinoids, so far as known, and we may add, in all Blastoids, the
peristomial area is formed by the calyx interradials, whether these
consist of one piece, as in the case of the Inadunata and Blastoidea,
or of two, three, or a dozen pieces, as in the Camarata; and the summit
plates, whether composed of a central plate only, or of proximals
also, rest against the upper margin of the interradials. In all Neo-
crinoidea, however, from the larva to the adult, the whole ventral
surface is covered by actinal structures, the small interradials which
were observed by Sir Wyville Thomson, disappear again soon after
their development, and never attain any such prominence in the
composition of the calyx as in the earlier Crinoids. This character,
which distinguishes the two groups so readily, would meet with most
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 105
serious exceptions if the ventral plates in Allagecrinus, Haplocrinus,
Culicocrinus and Coccocrinus, as asserted by Carpenter, represented
the orals. We think it was the superficial resemblance in the form
and position of these plates with the orals of certain Neocrinoidea
that led Carpenter to regard them as orals. He probably overlooked
the fact that the plates agree equally well on those points with the
interradials of the Cyathocrinidae, and that as interradials the above
genera would not be exceptional types, but comply with the morpho-
logical conditions of all their contemporaries.
We have shown that Culicocrinus and Coccocrinus, as members
of the Camarata, should have more than one interradial plate, and
it is not very likely that the secondary one, exceptionally in those
genera, would be substituted by a ring of oral plates. But there is
another serious difficulty. The slits in C. bacca extend out to the
first row of ventral plates as well as to the second, and this suggests
that, if Coccocrinus were “like the recent genus Holopus” to be “per-
manently in the condition of a crinoid larva, in which the orals have
not yet moved away from the radials, though separated from one
another,”* then both rows of plates were orals, one ring within the
other. Where among the numerous families of the Palaeocrinoidea
do we find an instance in which the plates constituting either the
oral pyramid or the proximals, are separated in that manner?
Nowhere ; but if there was such a case, we certainly would find it in
the highest developed forms and not in the larval ones. Again, where
do we meet among Palaeocrinoids with an open peristome? In the
earliest stages of the Neocrinoid larva, the orals are closed, and in the
earlier forms of the Camarata, such as Reteocrinus, Glyptocrinus, etc.,
the peristome is closed either by the upward growth of the calyx, or by
a small central piece, there being no proximals, and hence, accord-
ing to Carpenter’s interpretation of these plates, no orals. Those
genera appear to us to be in a similar condition to Adlagecrinus and
Haplocrinus among the Inadunata, and Culicocrinus and Coccocrinus
among the Camarata, but not in the condition of the Neocrinoidea at
all. However, we can readily understand why Carpenter holds so
tenaciously to these plates as orals, for it is principally upon these
plates that he bases his further theory, that in the higher Palaeocri-
noidea the orals are represented by the proximals; indeed they are
his “simplest forms” which he failed to find among Blastoids. In
the Challenger Report on p. 170, he says: “The proximal dome
* Chall. Report, p. 163.
8
106 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
plates rest directly against the calyx interradials, that on the poste-
rior side being represented by two small plates with the anus between
them” while there is a more or less tubercular ring of radial dome
plates outside them. These proximal dome plates thus correspond
exactly to the orals of Symbathocrinus and Haplocrinus, covering in
the peristome and resting against the calyx plates, which in the
Platycrinus are the interradials, and not the upper edges of the ra-
dials, as in the simpler forms”; and on p. 171: “I cannot therefore
see what other view can be taken of the proximal dome plates which
immediately surround the orocentral, than to regard them as orals,
i. e., as the actinal representatives of the basals, like the correspond-
ing platesin Symbathocrinus. If this be admitted, it follows that the
proximal dome plates of all Platycrinidae, Actinocrinidae and Rho-
docrinidae are also homologous with the orals of Neocrinoids.”
These conclusions perhaps might be well enough, 1F such a thing
as an orocentral had been established; but unfortunately this is not
the case. Neither are the plates in Symbathocrinus of which he
speaks as “the orals,” in our opinion, anything but proximals, and
hence all conclusions based thereon, to say the least of it, are inex-
pedient and rash. It is somewhat surprising that Dr. Carpenter,
although his whole theory is actually based upon his hypothetical
“orocentral,” gives such a meagre account of it. In the Challenger
Report, in introducing it on p. 158, he devotes to it only a few lines.
Referring to the small central plate of Haplocrinus, he says: “This
plate is one of considerable importance in its morphological relations.
In accordance withthe views which I have expressed elsewhere, I
believe it to be the representative on the actinal side, or left larval
antimer, of the dorsocentral plate which is developed in the center
of the right antimer or abactinal side of Urchins, Stellerids, and
Crinoids.” And on pp. 159 and 170, in pointing out its relations
to the proximals, he calls the plate the orocentral, and speaks of it
as a single plate. That is all Dr. Carpenter had to say about it,
and probably all that could be said, for such a plate has been here-
tofore unknown in Echinoderm morphology.
We do not deny that the so called dorsocentral of Urchins and
Stellerids is represented in the Comatula larva by the terminal plate
of the stem, but we see no good reason to postulate from this a
similar plate in the oral center. There are at the abactinal side
frequently also underbasals, which on the same principle should be
represented orally, but nothing is known of them. Why should
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 107
the dorsocentral be represented at the actinal side when there is no
actinal stem, in this or any other group of the Echinoderms? The
dorsocentral in the Echinozoa represents in a wider sense the whole
column in its simplest form, although in a narrower sense it is the
homologue of the first part of the stem that makes its appearance in
the embryo. If there was such a thing as an orocentral in fossil Cri-
noids, Blastoids and Cystids, it seems to us, it certainly would be rep-
resented in the early larva of the living types before the parting of
the orals, and in the closed oral pyramid of the Cystids and Steph.
anocrinus; but unfortunately for Carpenter’s theory we meet with
no trace of it in either one of those forms. The plate which he re-
gards as orocentral, occupies the place of the five orals in other groups,
and in a similar manner as these, covers the peristome and the
origin of the ambulacra. This is conclusively shown by comparing
the case of Caryocrinus in which the ambulacra start from beneath
the central plate and branch twice underneath the surrounding
plates,with the case of Sphaeronites (fig. 1) and Stephanocrinus (fig. 3),
in which theambulacrastart from beneath a penta-partite oral pyramid,
Does this indicate that the five plates constituting the latter, are the rep-
resentatives of the proximals? We doubtit, forthe structural resem-
blance is with the central piece. We think the distribution and arrange-
ment of the surrounding plates in Caryocrinus proves conclusively
that these cannot be orals, for the most ingenious speculator would be
unable to reconstruct five primitive plates from such an assemblage
of pieces as we find in Caryocrinus and in Von Koenen’s new genus
Juglandocrinus*. What those plates may be, whether actinal
or abactinal structures, we will not preterid to decide, but we do un-
dertake to say that they are not orals, otherwise the rule that there
are always five primitive orals meets with avery serious exception.
Somewhat more favorable perhaps to Carpenter’s views is the ar-
rangement of the proximals in the Palaeocrinoidea and Blastoidea,
in which the plates surrounding the central piece are unquestionably
actinal structures, and there is a possibility of reconstructing from
the six, seven, or more pieces, five primitive plates. We also admit
that in all cases where those plates come in direct contact with the
anal structures, their arrangement might possibly have been disturbed
thereby, but this explanation is not applicable to forms like Megisto-
crinus, Dorycrinus and many others, in which the anus is lateral or
moved away from the center to the arm regions or even beneath them.
But there are several other equally serious objections.
*Neues Jahrbuch fur Mineralogie 1886, Bd. II, Taf. IX, Fig. 3.
108 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
In the Comatula larva, which shows a decidedly bilateral symmetry,
there are five equal basals and five equal orals. In Thauwmatoerinus,
although it has anal plates and a large proboscis, the basals and
anals remain undisturbed. The same may be said of the basals of
the Palaeocrinoidea and Blasteidea; among which not a single in-
stance is known where the basal ring contains either anals or radials,
contrary to the proximals, among which nearly always anals and often
radials are enclosed. This shows that the presence of such plates,
if the proximals in those groups represent the orals, and the latter
the basals, would be totally at variance with the general rules of the
class both as to orals and basals.
The anal plates of the apical side either abut directly against the
radials, or are placed between the interradials. In most of the Cam-
arata, the first interradial at the azygous side is split into two halves
by the first or second anal piece. In others, the second anal is want-
ing, but the interradial is composed of two parts as if the anal were
present. In a few groups there are no anal plates whatever, and
the arrangement of the plates at all five sides is alike.
The same variations as among the interradials are found in the
arrangement of the proximals,* of which the four large plates corre-
spond to the calyx interradials at the four regular sides. The two
smaller proximals, which occupy the azygous interradius, either are
placed between two radial dome plates or they abut against two of
the larger proximals, enclosing generally an anal plate—but this
may be absent or pushed downard. f
As yet, we have not observed a single instance in which there were
five plates around a central one, but should it occur, which we think
is very possible, we doubtif Messrs. Etheridge and Carpenter, although
finding at last their “simpler form,” will be able to make much
out of it in support of their theories.
We stated heretofore that fig. A on p. 72 of the Blast. Cat. is
erroneous, and this, to some extent is the case with fig. B on the
same page. We never saw a Platycrinus with a single interradial,
all having three (or more), arranged transversely. Besides, the
figure is misleading in not giving the central piece and the so-called
radial-dome plates. If these plates had been added, as they should
have been to represent the case properly, it would show that the
radial-dome plates are placed opposite the radials, the proximals
opposite the interradials, and that the central piece takes orally the
*For the arrangement of the proximals see Revision Pt. III, pp. 47 to 50.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 109
position of the coalesced basal disc; a totally ditferent thing from
what the English authors attempted to prove by their figure.
We are altogether in accord with Goette and Carpenter in their
opinion that the orals are represented in the abactinal system by
the basals, but we disagree entirely with the latter writer that the
basals are represented orally by the proximals. We regard the
proximals as an element similar to the interradials, but, while these
fill up vacancies in the calyx, the former fill the open space around
the peristome as it widens in the growing animal by the increasing
width of the dorsal cup. To this conclusion we were led principally
by the arrangement of the plates, the presence of radial and anal
plates in the same ring with them, and by their gradual appearance in
geological times. We further believe the central piece is the only plate
which in the Palaeocrinoidea and Blastoidea can possibly represent
the quinque-partite oral pyramid. We regard it as being primi-
tively composed of five pieces, such as remained intact persistently
in Stephanocrinus and most of the Cystidea, but which were fused
together by anchylosis in other groups as aborally in the case of
the basals, which gradually were reduced from five to three, and in
certain groups to one solid piece. The proximals, therefore, in our
opinion, are not of that morphological importance as they are regarded
by Dr. Carpenter, and we think the same may be said of the so-called
radial dome plates. These also, like the proximals, seem to us mere
auxiliary pieces, filling up vacancies, beneath which the branching
of the ambulacra takes place. If they deserve the term radials at
all, they certainly represent the axillaries, and not the oculars or
first radials, except perhaps in some very complex species in which
there appear three successive pieces to each ray, the inner ones rest-
ing against the central plate in a similar manner as the true radials
rest against the basals; while the third or axillary one holds to-
ward the proximals and the ambulacra the very same relations as
the single radial does in the simpler form (See Revision Pt. III, Pl.
IV, Fig. 4, and Pl. VIII, Figs. 1, 3.). It is also very significant
that frequently in those complex forms there appear toward the cen-
ter within the ring of proximals (orals of Ether. and Carp.), two ex-
tra axillaries underneath which the two lateral rays, which are
united close to the peristome, divide so as to form the antero-and
postero- lateral rays. How Dr. Carpenter will explain the presence
of these plates within the “oral” ring, which is said to cover the ori-
gin of the ambulacra, is a mystery to us, and we look to him for in-
110 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
formation. The radial dome plates, as a rule, disappear when the
ambulacra enter the surface, and this explains why they are absent
in Blastoids,* Stephanocrinus and the later Cyathocrinidae.
We have already alluded to the fact that the proximals are fre-
quently unrepresented in the earlier groups, in which, as a rule, the
peristomial area is comparatively smaller than in later ones, and
closed only by a small central piece. Upon this point it is very in-
teresting that we have recently discovered the same thing in later
groups under somewhat different conditions. In two cases, the one
a species of Talarocrinus from the St. Louis group of Kentucky (Fig.
10), the other a Dichocrinus from the Kinderhook of Iowa, we found
the whole space usually occupied by central piece and proximals,
although as large asin any Platycrinus, filled completely by an enor-
mous, nodose central plate, with the covering pieces abutting against it.
Interposed between the ambulacra are a number of small interradial
plates, which barely touch the central piece. In these cases, accord-
ing to our interpretation, the increasing space of the peristomial area
was filled by lateral growth of the orals (central piece), instead of
by means of proximals. But according to Carpenter’s generaliza-
tions (Challenger Report, p. 171), the insignificant interradials next
to the central piece, and between the ambulacra, should be the repre-
sentatives of the orals or else his rules would encounter another se-
rious objection.
Dr. Carpenter regards both Allagecrinus and Haplocrinus as rep-
resenting in a phylogenetic sense embryonic stages of the Palaeocri-
noidea. If this be true, he has failed to give a reasonable explana-
tion how the large plates covering almost the whole ventral side in
these low forms, came to be placed in this group so as to occupy only
the relatively small space they do in what he regards as higher de-
veloped forms. Etheridge and Carpenter undertook to prove it in
their paper, Annals and Mag. Nat. Hist., Apr. 1881, p. 289, by im-
agining that, in the more mature specimens of Allagecrinus “the
orals were relatively carried inwards, away from the radials, and
separated from them by perisome ( just as they are in the Pentacri-
noid larva of Comatula) when the arms appear above the radials.
Whether the orals ever separated so as to open the mouth to the ex-
terior, and whether the ring of perisome forming the ventral disk
* Etheridge and Carpenter figure, Blastoid Catalogue on PI. XVIII, Fig,
16, Elaeacrinus Verneuili with radial dome plates; none of our specimens show
any traces of them.
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. Lit
between them and the radials was naked, as in Rhizocrinus, or plated,
as in Hyocrinus, must of course remain undiscovered.”
This explanation is suggestive enough of what may occur in the
Neocrinoidea, but they fail to give a parallel case in which such a
development as this took place in a single Palaeocrinoid, and this
omission is the more important since they place the genus A /lageeri-
nus in the latter group. They state afterwards (op. cit. p. 289). “It
is true we have no proof that there were any orals at all in the older
specimens ; but, judging from the relative sizes and development of
the largest examples with oral plates, and the smallest without, we
think it scarcely likely that they were entirely unrepresented in the
adult. It is obvious that, if they were united to the radials by peri-
some, whether plated or bare, they would be readily lost under con-
ditions that would have had no destructive effect on younger speci-
mens, in which there was a closer union between the two rings of
plates.”
From the foregoing quotation, it is obvious that the Authors de-
sired to prove from the fact that the ventral plates were not found
preserved in what they regarded as the most mature stages of the
species, that they could not have rested upon the radials as in their
younger examples, and that they were parted from the radials by
perisome. Upon this proposition we will observe that we have never
found among Palaeocrinoids the slightest evidence indicating to us
that any of the summit plates were carried inward by perisome. We
find that among the Camarata they occupy a comparatively small
space, but larger than in the Blastoidea, and that in all cases in
which they occur, they are supported by the upward growth of the
interradials. In the simpler forms of the Inadunata, when observed,
they rest upon a single interradial plate as in the case of the Siluri-
an Cyathocrinus alutaceous (Ang.). In the Carboniferous form of
Cyathocrinus, in which the ambulacra are placed upon the lateral
edges of the interradials, the orals are not carried inward by
perisome, but the perisome appears upon the surface of the interra-
dial plates. That the ventral plates were not preserved in the so-
called adult specimens of Allagecrinus is no proof that they did not
exist, or that they were carried inward. The simple fact that the
radials underwent the change from the horse-shoe form to a higher
state of development, having strongly marked articular facets, ex-
tending to the whole width of the plates, is sufficient to explain why
the interradials were not intact or reduced in the adult stages. We
112 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
need only refer to the parallel cases of Cyathocrinidae and Poterio-
crinidae. In the former, in which the articular facets were com-
paratively undeveloped, we have been able, in a number of instances,
to observe ventrally the interradial plates, which Etheridge and
Carpenter formerly regarded as structually identical with the so-
called orals of Allagecrinus. While in the Poteriocrinidae, in which
the articular facets are highly developed, no trace of these plates
has ever been found.
We, of course, do not claim that this is positive proof, that in
Allagecrinus these plates were not carried inward by perisome, but
it militates strongly against the probability of such a thing, while
the theory that they were is at best but the merest conjecture.
If Etheridge and Carpenter had placed Allagecrinus and Haplo-
crinus among the Neocrinoidea as larval forms, they might be much
better warranted in supposing that the plates in question were orals,
and were afterwards carried inward, but both forms have been re-
ferred by them to the Palaeocrinoidea, in which that mode of devel-
opment is altogether unknown. The case of Cyathocrinus shows
clearly that in the later types of the Inadunata the conditions of the
Palaeocrinoidea remain unchanged. The summit plates are not
carried inward by perisome, but occupy the same space as in the
earlier forms, and the perisome is formed upon the outer surface of
the interradials, (Revision, Pt. III, Pl. IV, Figs, 2, 3, 6.)
We should like to know upon what ground the authors maintain
that those genera are Palaeocrinoids, when they interpret their
structures according to the rules characteristic of the Neocrinoidea.
They neither have an anal plate, nor does Allagecrinus show any
such irregularity in the arrangement of its plates, as would of itself
warrant a reference to the Palaeocrinoids. The only irregularity
noticed in Allagecrinus is that the radials in some specimens may
be axillary in one to four of the rays, or not axillary in any of
them, and upon this character, curiously enough, Etheridge and
Carpenter seem to have separated Adlagecrinus from the Haplocri-
nidae and made it the type of a distinct family. On this alone it
appears they divide it from the Neocrinoidea, as if it were one of the
most constant characters among the Palaeocrinoids; while in fact
this peculiarity is found only in the Catillocrinidae, in two of the
rays of Tribrachiocrinus, and occasionally in Allagecrinus. A char-
acter like this is liable to be discovered exceptionally in any new
form of Neocrinoids, just as well as among Palaeocrinoids, while among
*
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 113
the latter we find a number of genera, in which the arrangement of
of the dorsal cup is altogether symmetrical.
It will not, of course, be inferred from the foregoing remarks that
we think Allagecrinus and Haplocrinus belong to the Neocrinoidea,
but simply that, if Messrs. Etheridge and Carpenter’s arguments
are valid, they necessarily lead to that conclusion. We think, on
the contrary, there are the strongest reasons for considering them
both to be Palaeocrinoids, and that there is no difficulty in discover-
ing entire conformity in their morphological conditions with other
Palaeocrinoids.
Whatever arguments Messrs. Etheridge and Carpenter may here-
after offer in favor of their oral theory, it seems to us, they will have
to explain upon palaeontological grounds how the five large ventral
plates of Allagecrinus and Haplocrinus which cover the whole ven-
tral surface happen to occupy in all higher or more advanced forms
a comparatively small space around the peristome. They will have
to point out by what process the five plates, without coming in con-
tact with the anus, were transformed into six pieces or more ; and
they will have to furnish better proof as to the existence of a so-called
“orocentral,” or they will have to modify their generalizations, which
are based almost exclusively upon this highly hypothetical plate.
EXPLANATIONS OF FIGURES, PLATE IV.
(The followiag letters are employed throughout the figures).
0, Oral plate or oral pyramid; p, proximals; i, interradials;
ia, interaxillaries; r, radials; a, anal plate; x,anus, g, grooves.
Fig. 1. Oral pyramid and surrounding plates of Sphaeronites glo-
bosus (after Angelin, Icon. Crin. Suec. Tab. XI, Fig. 14.)
2. Ventral aspect of Cyathocrinus Gilesi.
3. The same of Stephanocrinus angulatus.
4. The same of Haplocrinus mespiliformis.
5. Profile view of the same species.
6. Ventral aspect of Caryocrinus ornatus (after Hall, Palaeont.
N. York, Vol. II, Pl. 41a, Fig. le).
7. The ventral plates of Caryocrinus from near Louisville,
Ky. (The course of the subtegminal ambulacral tubes in-
dicated upon the surface of the plates).
8. Thesame of Juglandocrinus crassus (after von Koenen, Jahrb.
Miner. Bd. II, Taf. IX, Fig. 3.).
9. Ventral covering of a new Talarocrinus from Kentucky ; |
the peristomial area closed by a large central plate with-
out the aid of proximals.
114 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
10. The summit plates of Elaeacrinus Verneuili (after Eth.
and Carp., Blast. Catal. Pl. X VIII, Fig. 16).
11. The same of Elaeacrinus elegans (from Hall’s type in the
National Museum of New York.)
12-14. The same of Elaeacrinus obovatus, as seen in different speci-
mens. Fig. 12, all the sutures visible. Fig. 13, the suture
between central piece and smaller proximals obliterated.
Fig. 14, also those toward the small anal plate obliterated.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 115
APRIL 5.
Rev. Henry C. McCook, D. D. in the chair.
Forty-four persons present.
Papers under the following titles were presented for publication:—
“The Terrestrial Mollusca inhabiting the Samoa or Navigator
Islands.” By Andrew Garrett.
“Notes on Fresh-water Rhizopods of Swatow, China.” By Adele
M. Fielde.
Note on the Multiplication of Distoma.—A note was read from
Miss ADELE M. Frev_pr, dated Swatow, China, Feb., 1887, to the
effect that Distoma infests a species of snail found in many of the pools
and wells near Swatow which is eaten, boiled, by the Chinese, and
which is fed raw to ducks and geese. On dissecting, recently, an
apparently healthy specimen, having a shell an inch long, she had
found its liver almost wholly replaced by a Redia, the parent of the
Cercaria, which being passively transferred to the alimentary canal
of a vertebrate, develops into the Distoma. The life history of this
trematode, as worked out by A. P. Thomas, is given in the Quarterly
Journal of Microscopical Science, 1883, pp. 99-133, and Limneus
is mentioned as its host.
The Rediw seen in the snails were of an orange yellow
color and the largest were one-tenth of an inch in length.
There were counted two hundred and fifty-three that were large enough
to be easily isolated by the use of a needle point under the naked
eye; and scores more, of smaller size and paler yellow, were visible
under a lens. On opening several of the larger Rediw, whose mus-
cular mouths were active; they were found each to contain from
eighteen to twenty-six Cercarie, strong enough to whirl their tails
vigorously, beside many embryos less fully developed. The Cer-
carte moved rapidly over a glass slide by the use of their two
suckers ; and, merged in water, retained their vitality for thirty
hours after being removed from the snail and the Redia. The one
snail must have been the host of at least ten thousand larval
Distomas.
APRIL 12.
Mr. CHarues P. Perrot in the chair.
Thirty-one persons present.
The Placentation of the Two-toed Ant-eater, Cycloturus didactylus.
—Prof. J. A. RypeR remarked that some months since Mr. J. W.
116 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [ 1887.
Scollick kindly placed in his hands an example of the uterus, con-
taining a perfect foetus of this interesting little arboreal South
American Ant-eater. The only description of the foetus and mem-
branes of this animal which the speaker had been able to find, was
by Mayer, in his Analecta, while Milne-Edwards has figured and
described the foetus and membranes of the allied form, Tamandua,
in the “Annales des Sciences Naturelles.”
The almost globular uterus, containing a well-developed foetus, in
the specimen exhibited at the meeting of the Academy, was about
one inch in diameter. The placenta was relatively large, dome-
shaped, or in the form of a disk, seven-eighths of an inch in diame-
ter, much thickened in the center and becoming abruptly thin at
its margin. Its outer or maternal surface was very convex and its
inner or foetal surface distinctly concave. The rather short, stout
umbilical cord was attached at about the center of the disk and to
its inner surface. The placental disk when carefully inspected
upon its inner surface was found to be distinctly lobulated, some-
what as in the Sloths, as described by Sir Wm. Turner. The
fissures which divided the placental disk were especially conspicuous
when the edges of the disk were slightly bent by the fingers towards
the convex side.
The uterine cornua were short, and the uterus was simple as in
man and the sloths; the oviducts apparently quite small; the
ovaries of strikingly unequal dimensions on opposite sides. No
portion of the uterus was exserted or projected into the vagina as
in man, but the walls of the vagina passed directly into those of the
uterus. The vaginal mucous membrane was, however, deeply
plicated in a longitudinal direction, these plications extending
slightly into the cavity of the uterus.
The vessels of the cord are subdivided at their insertion into the
placental disk ; arterial and venous branches going to and from the
several placental lobes, of which there were five, which could be
distinctly made out.
On the inner surface of the uterine walls, there were apparently
adherent portions of the foetal and maternal tissues of the placenta,
showing that this type is in all probability more or less deciduate,
notwithstanding the fact that the uterine walls are relatively quite
thin. The area embraced by the true chorion or placenta covered
very nearly one-half of the inner surface of the globularly distended
uterus. The false chorion made up the other half of the membran-
ous investment of the foetus and was quite thin and translucent. It
covered with its outer surface about half of the inside of the uterus, or
that hemisphere of the latter at the pole of which the vagina opened
from without. The foetus itself was well advanced, having as yet no
outward hairy coat, nor could any traces of hair follicles be noted in
the skin. No epitrichium was observed, though this may be devel-
oped at a later period, or after the hair is erupted from the folli-
cles. The total length of the foetus was nearly or quite three
inches, of which the long stout tail formed more than a third.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 117
The speaker then contrasted the various types of placentation,
pointing out that it was largely a matter of how the blastodermic
vesicle was primarily brought into relation with the walls of the
uterus. Ifthe foetation occurred in the bicorned or tubular type of
uterus there was an obvious tendency toward the diffuse or zonary
type of placenta, as shown in Ungulates and Carnivora, and in those
uniparous forms in which the foetus occupies mainly one horn of the
uterus, and in which there are bare poles to the chorion and a
bare spot where the latter comes in contact with the os uterus as in
the Mare and Dugong. Here, the mere mechanical relations of
the fcetal and maternal surfaces obviously had had an influence in
determining the form of the placenta. The zonary placenta was
also imitated in Arthropods (Peripatus) in virtue of the existence
of such similar conditions in both the latter and Carnivorous
Mammalia. The speaker thought that all attempts to use the pla-
centa as a means of clearly distinguishing the various orders of
mammalia or of subdividing the latter into sub-classes would, in the
course of further embryological research, be shown to be not well
founded. This seemed all the more probable since the rationalé of
the so-called “inversion” of the germinal rays of Rodentia was
better understood. As a result of fuller knowledge it is hardly
conceivable that a zonary placenta could be found in those types,
notwithstanding the fact that they at first seem to present the same
type of condition for the blastodermic vesicle in the uterine
cornua as do the Carnivora. But now that we know that some of
the Insectivora (Talpa) tend in the same direction the anomalies
which are presented by Insectivora and Rodentia become explain-
able and lead us up to the view that, it depends (1) upon the mode
in which the early development is modified, and (2) upon the man-
ner in which the foetus is related to the maternal surfaces, whether
the diffuse, zonary or discoidal form of placenta will be assumed.
In the case of the Sloths and Ant-eaters, of South America, the
uterus has attained a remarkable degree of specialization, so as to
ereatly resemble the simple uterus of the higher Primates, and in
this case again, the relationship between the form of the uterine
cavity and that of the placenta seems obvious, for in the sloths,
ant-eaters and higher primates, the placenta is essentially discoidal
and deciduate. In the sloth, however, Turner has shown the
discoidal placenta to be made up of separable lobes; these may be
conceived as representing the cotyledons of Ungulates, or groups of
tufts in the diffuse type of placenta, which have been crowded
together as the uterine cornua became shortened on the mesometric
side, in the transition from the bifid to the simple type of uterus.
Some further ground for this view of the origin of the lobulated
discoidal, dome-shaped placenta of the sloths is supplied by the fact
that in Manis, or the scaly Ant-eater of the Old World, the placenta
is diffuse and non-deciduate. In some of the Armadilloes the
placenta is transversely oblong, and this again is a fact favorable to
the preceding view.
118 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
In like manner, the terms “ deciduate” and “non-deciduate” do
not serve to sharply mark off groups from each other, but probably
rest for their distinction upon the more or less intimate and complex
interlocking of the foetal and maternal membranes during their
functional activity. So that in this case again we are dealing with
structures and structural conditions differing only in degree but not
in kind. The extra thickening of the decidua or uterine mucosa in
the extremest type of deciduate placenta, may be regarded as cor-
related with the restriction, concentration or reduction of the
placental area and the formation of a decidua serotina. Finally, it
is proper to call attention to the fact that the American Edentata
are more specialized as respects their placentation than those of the
Old World. The American forms, further, generally agree amongst
themselves, except that in the Armadilloes, Milne-Edwards,
Kolliker and Von Jhering have observed that, in some species,
there may be a number of foetuses invested by a common chorion,
on which account, the latter author has supposed that such a com-
pound embryo is the result of the fragmentation or subdivision of a
single egg, a phenomenon of metagenesis to which he has applied
55?
the appropriate term Temnogeny.
Sugar in China—At the recent meeting of the Botanical Section,
Mr. Tuomas MEEHAN read the following extract from a letter of
Miss Adele M. Fielde, a missionary in China. The letter is dated
from Swatow. “My attention has lately been called to an error,
existing apparently in many minds, concerning the plant from
which sugar is made in China. pl. 12, fig. 11.
Abundant beneath decaying leaves in forests at Upolu.
This species is of a depressed turbinate form, with a moderate
umbilicus, 53 convex whorls, the last one angulated and the color
variable: fulvous, chestnut, corneous, luteous, unicolor or with two
chestnut bands one above and one beneath the angulated periphery.
Sometimes there is only a single spiral line on the upper surface.
Diam. 18 to 20 mill.
T. tuber, Mousson.
Trochomorpha tuber, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 334, pl.
14, fig. 5, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 474.
Helix tuber, Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 95, Pfeiffer, Mus.
Hel., vii, p. 278.
The habitat and station is the same as the preceding species but
is much more rare.
This rather small species may be characterized by its obtuse coni-
cal form, perforated base, yellowish horn color and two narrow
chestnut bands, one above the other beneath the periphery. Whorls
5%, convexly-rounded and the last one very slightly angulated.
Diam. 12, height 9 mill.
T. subtrochiformis, Mousson.
Helix trochiformis, Gould (not of a Exp. Exp. Shells, p.
61.
Helix Eurydice, Mousson (not of Gould), Jour. de Conch., 1865,
p. 170.
Trochomorpha sub-trochiformis, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869,
p-. 335, pl. 4, fig. 6; 1870, var. albo-striata, p. 122. Pease, Proc.
Zool. Soc. 1871, p. 474.
Helix sub-trochiformis, Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 95.
Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., vii, p. 289.
128 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
Abundant at Upolu and Savaii.
A depressed pyramidal species with a moderate umbilicus, rounded
apex and 53 slightly convex whorls, the last one acutely and com-
pressly keeled. The rude and irregular strie of growth resemble
interrupted pale scratches. Color luteous, or straw-yellow with a
dorsal and basal reddish-chestnut band. Diam. 17 mill. °
Prof. Mousson has described a variety from Kanathia, one of the
Viti Islands, under the name albo-striata. It is probably a distinct
species.
T, tentoriolum, Gould.
Helix tentoriolum, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1846, p.
176; Exp. Exp. Shells, p. 63, fig. 53. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., p. 119.
Trochomorpha tentoriolum, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p.
339. Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 474.
Dr. Gould who described this species from examples collected by
the United States Exploring Expedition cites “Upolu” as its hab-
itat. As it has not been noticed by subsequent explorers its exist-
ence in that group certainly needs confirmation.
It is a small, trochiform pale greenish species with rounded apex
and 6 flattened whorls which are beautifully striated and the last
one acutely carinated. Diam. 9, height 7 mill.
T. navigatorum, Pfeiffer.
Helix navigatorum, Pfeiffer, Proc. Zeol. Soc., 1854, p. 55; Mon.
Hel., iv, p. 114; (Videna) Vers., p, 182. Reeve, Conch. Icon., no,
1303, pl. 187.
Trochomorpha navigatorum, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 474.
Dr. Pfeiffer described this species from specimens in the Cuming-
ian Collection which were labelled “Navigator Islands.” Like the
preceding species the above habitat is questionable.
Pfeiffer says it isa moderately umbilicated, solid, lentiform species
of a purplish-brown, or reddish-grey color, with an obtuse, convex
spire, marginated suture and 6 slightly convex whorls, the last one
compressly carinated, Diam. 182, height 72 mill.
T. luteo-cornea, Pfeiffer.
Helix luteo-cornea, Pfeiffer, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1854, p. 56; Mon.
Hel., iv, p. 186, (Videna) Vers., p. 182. Reeve, Conch. Icon., no.
1287, pl. 186.
This, like the preceding species, is described from specimens in
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 129
Cuming’s Collection, labelled “Navigator Islands.” It has not been
identified by either Prof. Mousson or myself.
The description refers to a solid, lenticular, conoidal luteous-horn
colored species with a moderately sized umbilicus and five regular
striz. Whorls 5, convex, the last one angulated.
T. Samoa, Hombron and Jacquinot.
Helix Samoa, Hom. et Jacq., Voy. Pol Sud., Zool., v, p. 11, pl. 4,
figs. 28-31. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., iv, p. 69.
Helicopsis, Samoa, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soe., 1871, p. 475.
This species which has not been identified since the above nat-
uralists published their description, may possibly be a form of
Gould’s Troilus. They give the habitat “Upoulon”= Upolu.
They describe it as having a medium sized umbilicus, conoidal
form, rather fine striae, luteous color with two fuscous lines, and.
5% whorls, the last one subangular; base convex, aperture lunate
and the peristome simple. Diam. 18, height 10 mill.
PATULA, Held.
P. gradata, Gould. ;
Helix gradata, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1846, p. 172 ;
Exp. Exp. Shells, p. 49, fig. 48. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., i, p. 104.
(Charopa) Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 90.
Discus gradatus, H. and A. Adams, Gen. Moll., ii, p. 117.
Patula gradata, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 168; 1869,
p. 3383; 1871, p. 12.
Pitys gradata, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 474.
Common beneath decaying vegetation and is probably distributed
throughout the group. It is common also to the Tonga Islands.
A small, orbicular, depressed, widely umbilicated species with 5
convex whorls, the last one subangulated on the margin of the broad
umbilicus and the delicate strize of growth are cancellated by five
revolving impressed lines. Aperture sub-orbicular, color pale oliva-
ceous with radiating rufous spots. Diam. 6 mill.
P. complementaria. Mousson.
Patula complementaria, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 168,
pl. 14, figs. 5, 1869, p. 353.
Helix complementaria, Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., v, p. 157. (Patula)
Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 89.
130 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887-
Pitys complementaria, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 474.
A rare species found beneath rotten wood and under decaying
leaves in the forests back of Apia village, Upolu.
It is a little smaller than gradata and the umbilicus is only mod-
erately open. The spire is depressed, suture deep, whorls 5, with
transverse, crowded, sharp rib-like striz. Color corneous, tessellated
and radiately striped with chestnut.
P. allecta, Cox.
Helix allecta, Cox, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1870, p. 81. Pfeiffer, Mon.
Hel., vii, p. 162. 5
Iam unacquainted with this species which was found at Upolu.
Dr. Cox says it is a minute, depressed, orbicular reddish-chestnut
species, with closely-set strong strixe, 42 to 5 convex whorls, deep
suture and the broad umbilicus is saucer shaped.
PITYS, Beck.
P. hystricelloides, Mousson.
Patula hystricelloides, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 169, pl.
14, fig. 6. (Endodonta) 1869, p. 331. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff.,
v, p. 93.
Helix hystricelloides, Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., v, p. 221. (Patula) Pae-
tel, Cat. Conch., p. 91.
Pitys hystricelloides, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 474.
Not uncommon under rotten wood and beneath decaying leaves.
Upolu.
This species may be determined by its depressed rounded form,
curved costulate strize, depressed spire, 53 whorls, and more partic-
ularly by the numerous laminz in the aperture, of which there are
from 3 to 4 on the parietal region and 6 to 8 in the palate. The
umbilicus is about one-fifth the diameter of the shell. Diam. 42
mill,
P. Graeffei, Mousson.
Patula (Endodonta) Graeffei, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p.
332, pl. 14, fig. 3.
Helix Graffei, Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., vii, p. 258.
Pitys Graffei, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 474.
I am not acquainted with this species which was found at Upolu
by Dr. Graffe.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 131
It is a little larger than the preceding species, with a more open
umbilicus, 5 whorls, and 2 laminz on the parietal wall and 5 in the
palate. “Diam. 5-2 mill.
STENOGYRA, Shuttleworth.
S$. Tuckeri, Pfeiffer.
Bulimus Tuckeri, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1846, p. 30; Mon. Hel., ii, p.
158; (Opeas) Vers., p. 156, Reeve, Conch. Icon., pl. 68, sp. 481.
( Opeas). Cox, Mon. Aust. Land Shells, p. 69, pl. 13, fig. 9, Brazier,
Quar. Jour. Conch., i, p. 272.
Stenogyra Tuckeri, Albers, Die Hel., ed. 2d. p. 265. (Opeas)
Frauenfeld, Verh. Zool Bot. Wien, xix, p. 873. Pease. Proc.
Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 473. Garrett, Jour. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila.,
1881, p. 393, 1885, p. 43.
Bulimus junceus, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1846, p. 191;
Exp. Exp. Shells, p. 76, fig. 87. Pfeiffer, Mus. Hel., ii, p. 220.
Stenogyra juncea, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 340. Pease
Jour. de Conch., 1871, p. 95; Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 473. ( Opeas)
Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 104. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 90.
Garrett, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 1879, p. 19.
Bulimus Walli, Cox, Cat. Aust. Land Shells, p. 24. Pfeiffer,
Mon. Hel., vi, p. 99.
Stenogyra Upolensis, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 175.
( Obeliscus) Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 104. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff.,
lv, p, 29.
Bulimus Upolensis, Pfeiffer. Mon. Hel., iv, p. 100.
Bulimus Panayensis, Pfeiffer, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1846, p. 33; Mon.
Hel., ii, p. 156; (Opeas) Vers., p. 156. Reeve, Conch. Icon., pl.
14, no. 76. (Opeas) Albers, Die Hel., p. 175.
Subulina Panayensis, H. and A. Adams, Gen. Moll. ii, p. iii.
Semper, Phil. Land-Moll., ii, p. 137, pl. 8, fig. 15.
Stenogyra Panayensis, (Opeas), Albers, Die Hel., ed. 2d., p. 265.
Martens, Ostas. Zool., ii, p. 83, (Siam), 376, pl. 22, fig. 8. (Opeas)
Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 104.
Bulimus diaphanus, Gassies (not of Pfeiffer), Jour. de Conch.,
1859, p. 370.
~Bulimus Souverbianus, Gassies, Faune Nouv. Caled., p. 52, pl. 2,
fig. 5. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., vi., p. 98.
Bulimus Artensis, Gassies, Jour. de Conch., 1866, p. 50. Pfeiffer,
Mon. Hel. vi, p. 98.
132 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
Stenogyra novemgyrata, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1870, p. 126.
(Subulina), Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 104. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeft.,
Wy Pao:
Bulimus novemgyratus, Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., viii, p. 138.
Stenogyra gyrata, Mousson MS., in Mus. Godeffroy, 1885.
This species, which is distributed over a larger geographical area
than any other species of land-shell, is diffused throughout all parts
of Polynesia, the low coral islands as well as the more elevated
groups, and ranges throughout Melanesia, Micronesia, Australasia,
Moluccas, Philippines, Guam, Ceylon, Siam, Cochin China, China,
and probably extends its range as far as the East coast of Africa.
Since the publication of my paper on the Society Island land-
shells I have received from Mr. E. L. Layard, examples of Bulimus
Soweérbianus and B. Artensis,both of which are identical with Poly-
nesian specimens of S. Tuckert.
Through the kindness of Dr. Hungerford, of Hong Kong, I have
been enabled to compare Pfeiffer’s Bulimus Panayensis with B.
Tuckert and cannot detect a single character to separate the two
species.
I am strongly inclined to believe that the West Indian Stenogyra
subula, Pfr., is a form of the Polynesian S. Tuckeri, and was acci-
dentally imported with the Tahitian bread-fruit plants nearly 100
yearsago. M. M. Crosse and Fischer (Jour. de Conch., 1863, p. 361),
record the West Indian Bulimus subula from Cochin China, and
give a good figure of the same, which is, undoubtedly, the ubiquitous
S. Tuckeri. I reproduce their remarks as follows :—
“Cette espéce provient de Saigon et de Fuyen-Moth, ot elle a été
recueillie, par M. Michau, dans les fossés, dans la terre et sous les
herbes. IL peut sembler trés-extraordinaire de retrouver en Cochin-
chine une espéce des Antilles, qui n’ a guére été signalée jusqu’ ici
qua Cuba, 4 la Jamaique et a Saint-Thomas. Pour ne conserver
aucun doute 4 son égard, nous avons cru devoir soumettre un indi-
vidu authentique 4 l’ examen de M. Pfeiffer, qui a créé l espéce.
Il faut done accepter le fait, qui peut étre, au reste, seulement un
accident d’ acclimatation: la petitesse et la légéreté de la coquille
en question rendent cette supposition vraisemblable.”
I have lately received from Dr. Hungerford, several examples of
Stenogyras, labelled “ Opeas subulata Pfr. Hong Kong” which
differed none from the Polynesian S. Tuckert.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 133
This species, which is chiefly confined to the low-lands near the
sea-shore, is found beneath decaying vegetation and under loose
stones. It may be easily recognized by its small size, subcylindri-
eal form, thin texture and pale horn color. The animal is pale
yellow.
PARTULA, Ferussac.
P. Actor, Albers.
Partulus actor, Albers, Die Hel., p. 187.
Partula actor, Chem, ed. 2d., pl. 48, figs. 138, 14. Pfeiffer, Mon.
Hel., iii, p. 450. Hartman, Cat. Part., p. 12; Obs. Gen. Part. Bull.
Mus. Comp. Zool., p. 179; Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 1885, p.
220.
Partula Recluziana, Petit, Jour. de Conch., 1850, p. 170,-pl. 7,
fig. 5. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., ili, p. 452. Mousson, Jour. de Conch.,
1869, p. 339. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 104. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus.
Godeff, v, p. 91.
Partula zebrina, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1848. p. 196 ;
Exp. Exp. Shells, p. 82, fig. 89. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., iii., p. 450.
This species, which is unknown to me, inhabits Tutuila. It may
be distinguished by its ovate-conical form, whitish or pale fulvous
color, ornamented with more or less flexuous paler lines. Length 19
mill.
P. expansa, Pease.
Partula expansa, Pease, Amer. Jour. Conch., 1871, p. 26, pl. 9,
fig. 3; Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 473 (eatensa in err.). Pfeiffer,
Mon. Hel., viii, p. 203. Hartman. Cat. Part., p. 138; Obs. Gen.
Part., Bul. Mus. Comp. Zool., p. 182; Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila.,
1885, p. 212.
Partula zebrina, Mousson (not of Gould), Jour. de Conch., 1865,
p. 173, 1869, p. 339.
This charming species, which is not uncommon on foliage at
Upolu, may be distinguished by its white color and spiral opaque-white
interrupted lines. The spire is moderately produced, the last whorl
ventricose, obliquely produced and the base exhibits a large umbili-
cus. The peristome is broadly and flatly expanded. Length 19
mill,
Mr. Pease, on the authority of Mr. Brazier cites Tutuila as its
habitat.
134 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF - [1887.
P. canalis, Mousson.
Partula canalis, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 172; 1869, p.
337 (var. semilineata). Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., vi, p. 155. Pease,
Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 473. Paetel, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 91,
Partula Bulimoides, Hartman (not of Lesson), Cat. Gen. Part.,
pp-, 12, 13 with wood cut; Obs. Gen. Part. Mus. Comp. Zool., p.
180.
Partula cornica, Gould (part), Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1847,
p- 196. Hartman, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 1885, p. 222.
Not infrequent on foliage at Upolu. The variety was found by
Dr. Griiffe at Tutuila.
A fine large sinistral species, 29 mill. long. elongate conical in
shape, of a fulvous-brown color with darker tinted spire. Aperture
large’; peristome whitish, broadly expanded, slightly reflexed and a
deep transverse sulcation marks the upper part of the columella lip.
The fine spiral incised lines which are very distinct on the whole
surface of P. conica are only visible on the boundaries of the open
umbilicus and on the apical whorls.
P. abbreviata, Mousson.
Partula abbreviata, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 339, pl.
14, fig. 7. Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p.473. Paetel, Cat. Conch.,
p. 104. Schmeltz Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 91. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel.,
viii, p. 200. Hartman, Cat. Gen. Part., p. 13; Obs. Gen. Part.,
Bul. Mus. Comp. Zool., p. 179.
This fine species which is unknown to me was found at Tutuila
by Dr. Grafte.
An ovate, thin, pale horn colored species closely allied to but
much more abbreviated than P. conica. Prof. Mousson says it is
intermediate between the latter species and P. canalis. Length 21
mill.
P. conica, Gould.
Partula conica, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1847, p. 196 ;
Expl. Exp. Shells, p. 81. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., iii, p. 445. Mousson,
Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 171. Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p.
473. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 104. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff.,
v, p. 91. Hartman, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 1885, p. 222.
Partula Upolensis, “Mousson” Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., no. 1.
Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 104.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 135
Partula Bulimoides, Hartman (not of Lesson), Cat. Gen. Part. p.
12; Obs. Gen. Part. Bul. Mus. Comp. Zool., p. 108.
Not uncommon on foliage at Upolu and Tutuila.
A dextral oblong-conical, luteous-horn colored species, smaller
than the sinistral P. canalis, with five convex whorls and rather
large aperture. Lip white and broadly expanded. Length 23 to
24 mill.
P. Brazieri, Pease.
Partula Brazieri, Pease, Amer. Jour. Conch., 1871, p. 27, pl. 9,
fig. 5; Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 473. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel. viii, p.
194.
“Tutuila” (Brazier).
Mr. Pease received a single example of this species from Mr.
Brazier who says it was the only specimen found at the above men-
tioned locality.
Dr. Hartman, who has examined the type specimen in the Mu-
seum of the Philadelphia Academy, refers it to the synonomy of P.
Caledonica « New Hebrides species. Judging from the figure of
Braziert it certainly has a strong resemblance to the New Hebrides
Partula. J doubt it having been obtained at Tutuila.
TORNATELLINA, Beck.
T. oblonga, Pease.
Tornatellina oblonga, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1864, p. 673 ; 1871,
p. 473; Jour. de Conch., 1871, p. 93. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., vi, p.
264. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 89. Garrett, Proc. Phil.
Acad. Nat. Sci., 1879, p. 21; Jour. Phil. Acad. Nat. Sci., 1881, p,
398.
Tornatellina bacillaris, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1871, p. 16, pl.
3, fig. 5. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, pp. 89, 90. Pfeiffer, Mon.
Hel. viii, p. 316.
Stenogyra (Subulina) bacillaris, Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 104.
Inhabits all the groups from the Paumotu to the Viti Islands,
and was found by Dr. Graffe on the low coral islands of the Ellice’s
group in “Central Pacific.” On the ground in forests.
This species may be distinguished by its imperforated base, slen-
der form, thin pellucid texture, fuscous-horn color, 6 whorls, and
nearly vertical simple columella. Length 42 mill.
136 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [ 1887.
'T. conica, Mousson.
Tornatellina conica, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 342, pl.
14, fig. 8; 1871 (var. impressa), p. 16. Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc.,
1861, p. 473. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., viii, p. 316. Garrett, Proc. Phil.
Acad. Nat. Sci., 1879, p. 21; Jour. Phil. Acad. Nat. Sci., 1881, p..
399 ; 1884, p. 81, Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 89.
Cionella conica, Paetel, Cat. Conch. p. 116.
Has the same range and station as the preceding species.
It is more robust and lighter colored than oblonga, the spire more
tapering, body-whorl larger, more compressed, parietal laminze
more prominent and the columella more twisted than in that species.
SUCCINEA, Draparnaud.
§, putamen, Gould.
Succinea putamen, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1846, p.
183; Exp. Exp. Shells, p. 13, fig. 16. Pfeiffer, Mus. Hel., ii, p.
522. Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 174; (Amphibulima)
1869, p. 343. Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 472. (Amphib-
ulima) Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 118. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v,
p- 89.
Omalonyx putamen, H.and A. Adams, Gen. Moll., ii, p. 181.
Common on foliage at Upolu.
This fine large species may be distinguished by its depressed
ovate form, thin texture, fulvous-horn color, very short spire, 12
whorls, the last one with irregular, interrupted impressed strize.
Aperture very large, roundly-ovate, and the columella subplicated.
Length 17, Diam. 123 mill.
§. crocata,Gould.
Succinea crocata, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1846, p. 183;
Exp. Exp. Shells, p. 28, fig. 21. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., ii, p. 520.
Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 174; (Amphibulima) 1869,
p. 843. H. and A. Adams, Gen. Moll., ii, p. 128. Paetel, Cat.
Conch., p. 118. Pease, Proce. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 472. Schmeltz,
Cat. Mus. Godeff.,v, p. 89.
Abundant at Upolu.
A large species of a rather thin texture, ovate-globose form, ful-
vous-horn color, 2} whorls, the last one very large, usually with
revolving impressed lines. Spire short. Length 19, diam. 13 mill.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 137
S$. modesta, Gould.
Succinea modesta, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1846, p.
186; Exp. Exp. Shells, p. 23, fig. 24. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., ii, p. 521,
Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 174; (Amphibulima) 1869, p.
343. H. and A. Adams, Gen. Moll., ii, p. 129. Pease, Proc. Zool.
Soc., 1871, p. 472. (Brachyspira) Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 113.
Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 89
Succinea Cheynei, Dohrn, MS.
I found this species abundant on the ground in a forest at Upolu.
Its small size (9 mill. long), ovate form, thin texture, luteous-
horn color, moderate spire, and 3 whorls will readily distinguish it.
S. Manua, Gould.
Succinea Manua, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1846, p. 185 ;
Exp. Exp. Shells, p. 25, fig. 23. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., ii, p. 520. H.
and A. Adams, Gen. Moll., ii, p. 129. Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871,
p- 472.
Said to inhabit Manua Island.
Gould says it is a small, ovate, ventricose, thin, straw-colored
species, with an obtuse spire, 2} whorls, deep suture and marked by
longitudinal striz and transverse rugosities. Length 10 mill.
VERTIGO, Miiller.
V. pediculus, Shuttleworth.
Pupa pediculus, Shuttleworth, Bern. Mitth. 1852, p. 296. Pfeiffer,
Mon. Hel., iii, p.557. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v. 89. Mousson
(var. Samoensis), Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 175.
Vertigo pediculus, Pfeiffer, Vers., p. 177. (Alea) H. and A.
Adams, Gen. Moll., ii, p. 172. Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p.
341. Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, pp. 463, 474. Garrett, Proc.
Phil. Acad. Nat. Sci. 1879, p.19; Jour. Phil. Acad. Nat. Sci.,
1881, p. 400. :
Pupa Samoensis, “Mss.” Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., iv. p. 108.
(Sphyradium) Paetel, Cat. Conch. p. 108.
Pupa nitens, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1860, p. 439. Pfeiffer, Mon.
Hel., vi, p. 355. .
Vertigo nitens, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, pp. 463, 474.
Pupa hyalina, “Zelebor,” Pfeiffer. Mon. Hel., vi, p. 329.
Vertigo hyalina, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 474.
Vertigo nacca, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc., Nat. Hist., 1862, p. 280 ;
Otia Conch., p. 237, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, pp. 463, 474.
fae nacca, Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., vi, p. 330.
0
158 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
Common to all the Polynesian groups.
Its minute size, ovate-oblong shape, hyaline texture, obtuse spire,
rounded aperture, and the thin slightly expanded lip will readily
distinguish it. There are usually 5 denticles in the aperture.
V. tantilla, Gould.
Pupa (Vertigo) tantilla, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1847,
p. 197, Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., iii, p. 557. (Vertigo) Mousson, Jour. de
Conch., 1870, p. 127. (Vertigo) Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., iv, p.
69. (Pupinella) Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 108.
Vertigo tantilla, Gould, Exp. Exp. Shells, p. 92, fig. 103. (Alea)
H. and A. Adams, Gen. Moll. iii, p. 172. Pease. Proc. Zool. Soc.,
1871, pp. 460, 463, 474. Garrett, Jour. Phil. Acad. Nat. Sci., 1881,
p. 400.
Pupa pleurophora, Shuttleworth, Bern. Mittheil., 1852, p. 296.
Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., iii, p. 560.
Vertigo pleurophora, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 474.
Pupa Dunkeri, “Zelebor” Pfeitter, Mon. Hel., vi, p. 333.
Vertigo Dunkeri, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 474.
Vertigo armata, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, pp. 461, 474.
Pupa armata, Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., viii, p. 407.
Vertigo dentifera, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, pp. 462, 474.
Pupa dentifera, Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., viii, p. 408.
Ranges from the Society to the Viti Islands. This and the pre-
ceeding species are found beneath rotten wood, under stones and
amongst decaying leaves.
In shape it varies from an abbreviate-ovate to oblong-oval, and
they vary to a greater or less degree in the relative proportion of
the whorls. Color pale corneous under a brownish more or less
distinctly shagreened epidermis, which in perfect examples is fur-
nished with oblique membranous riblets. The last whorl behind
the peristome is frequently bisulcate.
MELAMPUS, Montfort.
M. luteus, Quoy and Gaimard.
Auricula lutea, Quoy and Gaimard, Voy. Astrol., i, p. 163, pl.
6, figs. 25-27. Deshayes, Lam. Hist., viii. p. 338. Kuster, Auric.,
p. 39, pl. 6, figs. 1-3. Mousson, Jay. Moll.. p. 47, pl. 5, fig. 6.
Conovulus luteus, Anton, Verz., p. 48.
Melampus luteus, Beck, Ind., p. 106. M. E. Gray, Figs. Moll.
Anim., pl. 306, fig. 5, H. and A. Adams, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1854, p.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PH{LADELPHIA. 139
10; Gen. Moll., ii, p. 243. Pfeiffer, Syn. Auric., no. 30;.Mon. Auric.
i, p. 36. Mérch, Cat. Yold., p. 38. Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869,
p. 346. Martens and Langk. Don. Bism., p. 55. Gassies, Faun.
Nouv. Caled., p. 62. Pease, Jour. de Conch., 1871, p. 93; Proce.
Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 477. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 114. Schmeltz, Cat.
Mus. Godeff, v, p. 88. Garrett, Proc. Phil. Acad. Nat. Sci., fe
p- 28. Jour. Phil. Acad. Nat. Sci., 1881, p. 402.
Abundant just above high-w ae mark and ranges from the
;ambier Islands to the East Indies.
This species may be easily recognized by its large size (18 mill.)
and uniform luteous color.
M. fasciatus, Deshayes.
Auricula fasciata, Deshayes, Encycl. Meth., ii, p. 90; Lam. Hist.,
vill, p. 3387. Kuster, Auric., pl. a, figs. 2, 3. Mousson, Jav. Moll, p.
46, pl. 5, figs. 28-29.
+ Melampus fasciatus, Beck, Ind. Moll, p. 107. (ralia) H. and A.
Adams, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1854, p. ii. Pfeiffer, Syn. Auric., no. 33;
Mon. Auric., i, p. 38. Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 348.
Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 477. Martens and Langk., Don.
Bism., p. 55. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 114. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff.,
v, p. 88. Garrett, Jour. Phil. Acad. Nat. Sci., 1881, p. 402.
Conovulus fasciatus, ‘Griffith, Cuy. Anim. King., pl. 27, fig.
13. Anton, Verz., pl. 48. Guerin, Icon. Moll. pl. 17, pl. 7, fig. 8.
Tralia (Pira) fasciata, H. and A. Adams, Gen. Moll., ii, p. 240.
Auricula trifasciuta, Kuster, Auric., p. 38, pl. 5, figs. 15-17.
Melampus trifasciatus, Pfeiffer, Syn. Aurica., no. 38; Mon. Auric.,
i, p. 48, H. and A. Adams, Gen. Moll., ii, p. 248. Gassies, Faun.
Nouv. Caled., p. 63, Cox, “Exchange List,” p. 33. Brazier, Quar.
Jour. Conch., i, p. 274.
Auricula monile, Quoy and Gaimard, Voy. Astrol., ii, p. 166, pl.
13, figs. 28-33. Potiez and Michaud, Gal. Douai., i, p. 208. Reeve,
Conch. Syst., 11, pl. 187, fig. 8.
Cassidula ? monile, M. E. Gray, Figs. Moll. Anim., p. 306, figs. 10-
11. (Ex. Q. and G.)
This, like the preceding species lives just above high-water mark
and has the same extensive geographical range.
It is subject to considerable variation in form, color and fasciation.
The type varies from bluish-white to luteous and girdled by four to
six narrow chestnut bands. Varieties of a uniform bluish-white,
-corneous, brownish or orange-brown are not infrequent, as well as
140 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
one of an orange-brown with three chestnut bands. The spire is
marked with minute radiating grooves which are very faintly ex-
pressed or very conspicuous, sometimes covering the whole spire or
only visible at the apex. Length 11 to 14 mill.
M. parvulus, Nuttall.
Melampus parvulus, Nuttall, MS., Pfeiffer, Syn. Auric., no. 11;
Mon. Auric., p. 24. H. and A. Adams, Gen. Moll., ii, p. 243. Peake:
Proce. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 477. Martens and Langk. Don. Bism., p.
56, pl. 3. fig. 10. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 114. Brazier, Quar. Jour.
Conch., i, p. 247.
Common on the margins of mangrove swamps. Also common in
the Tonga and Viti Islands. Mr. Nuttall obtained the type speci-
mens at the Sandwich Islands. It not only inhabits New Caledonia
but ranges west as far as Torres’ Strait, where it was found by Mr.
Brazier.
The Samoa specimens which are a little smaller than Nuttall’5
type, differ none from the latter except having one or two more
denticles or plicze on the parietal region, and the base is more dis-
tinctly, impressly striated, It may be recognized by its ovate shape,
smooth shining surface, dark-chestnut, or olive brown color, short
convexly conoid spire and mucronated apex. On the lower portion
of the parietal region may be observed two approximating folds, the
lower one the smaller and occasionally wanting. There are usually
one or two small denticles above, and the palate has 5 to 7 lamine.
The columellar fold is continuous with the basal portion of the per-
istome. Length 7-9 mill.
M. Tongaensis, Mousson.
Melampus Tongaensis, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1871, p. 22, pl.
3, fig. 8. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 88. Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum.
(Auric.), iv, p. 316.
A few examples found in the same station as the preceding species.
Common also in the Tonga and Viti Islands.
Very closely allied to, and perhaps only a form of MZ. parvulus.
It is about the same size and color, but is a little more oblong and
the spire is more produced. The fold and dentition is the same in
the two species.
M. semisulcatus, Mousson.
Melampus semisulcatus, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 347,
pl. 15, fig. 2, Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 114. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff.,
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 141
v, p. 88. Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum. (Auric.), iv, p. 318. Pease, Proc.
Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 477.
Common on the margins of mangrove swamps. Occurs also in
the Tonga and Viti Islands.
This species is of an oblong pear-shape, uniform cinnamon color,
spire short, usually eroded, spirally grooved, the grooves more or
less evanescent on the middle of the body-whorl. There are three
folds on the parietal region and usually two laminee in the palate.
Length 11 mill.
M. striatus, Pease.
Melampus striatus, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1861, p. 244; 1871, p.
477. Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum. (Auric.), iv, p. 511. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus.
Godeff., v, p. 88.
Melampus Montrouzieri, Souverbie, Jour. de Conch., 1866, p. 148,
pl. 6, fig. 1, la. Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum. (Auric.), iv, p. 312.
Melampus ornatus, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1871, p. 21, pl. 3,
fig. 7. Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum. (Auric.), iv, p. 312.
A few examples found on the margins of swamps at Upolu. It
also inhabits the Society, Tonga and Viti Islands as well as New
Caledonia.
It may be distinguished by its oblong-ovate form, brownish-cor-
neous, chestnut-brown or greenish-brown color, mucronated spire, 8
whorls, marked by closely-set transverse impressed lines, and the
upper half with small longitudinal plications which give that part
of the shell a granulated appearance. The transverse lines are
frequently evanescent on the middle of the body-whorl. There are
from two to three folds on the parietal region, the upper one small
and granuliform. There may be observed one to three lamelliform
plications in the palate, and, sometimes with several raised white
parallel strie. Length 9-10 mill.
M. castaneus, Muhlfeld.
Voluta castanea, Muhlfeld, Mag. Ges. Nat. Fr. Berl., vii, 1818, p.
4, pl. 1, fig. 2.
Auricula castanea, Philippi, Zeits. Malak. 1851, p. 54.
Melampus castaneus, Pfeiffer, Mon. Auric., p. 30. Mousson, Jour.
de Conch., 1869, p. 349.
Prof. Mousson records this species in his Samoan list. It did not
occur to my notice.
142 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
LAIMODONTA, Nuttall.
L. Layardi, H. and A. Adams.
Ophicardelus Layardi (Laimodonta), H. and A: Adams, Proce.
Zool. Soc., 1854, p. 35.
Laimodonta Layardi, H. and A. Adams, Gen. Moll, ii, p. 246.
Melampus Layardi, Pfeiffer, Syn. Auric., no. 48; Mon. Auric., p.
51. Gassies, Faun. Nouv. Caled., p. 61, pl. 7, fig. 7. Tennent’s Cey-
lon, i, p. 239. Cox, “Exchange List,” p. 33. H. Nevill, Enum. Hel.
ete., Ceylon, 1871, p. 4.
Laimodonta conica, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1862, p. 242; Amer.
Jour. Conch., 1868, p. 101, pl. 12, fig. 15; Jour. de Conch., 1871,
pp- 93, 94. Proc, Zool. Soc., 1871. pp. 470, 477. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus.
Godeff., v, p. 81. Garrett, Jour. Phil. Acad. Nat. Sci., 1881, p. 403.
Laemodonta conica, Martens and Langk., Don. Bism., p. 57, pl. 3,
fig. 13.
Laimodonta Anaaensis, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 63,
pl. 5, fig. 1.
Plecotrema Anaaensis, Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 114.
Melampus conicus, Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum. (Auric.), iv, p. 319.
“2” Melampus Anaaensis, Pfeiffer, 1. c., p. 320.
A few beach-worn specimens found at Upolu. Ranges from the
Paumotu Islands to the East Indies.
This species is acuiminately-ovate, rather solid, spirally striated by
incised lines, spire rather long, acute; color chestnut-brown, with
one or two transverse whitish bands. Parietal region with two
plaits, one on the columella and one or two in the palate.
Length 6 to 8} mill.
CASSIDULA, Ferussae.
C. crassiuscula, Mousson.
Cassidula crassiuscula, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 345,
pl. 15, fig. 1. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 114. Pease, Proc. Zool. Soe.,
1871, p. 477. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 88. Pfeiffer, Mon.
Pneum. (Auric.), iv, p. 392.
Auricula (Cassidula) crassiuseula, Mousson, Jour. de Conch.,
1871, p. 191.
Cassidula nucleus, Gassies, (Martyn ?), Faun. Nouv. Caled., p. 71,
pl. 3, fig. 9.
Common on the mud in mangrove swamps, and inhabits the
Tonga, Viti and the islands in Melanesia.
>
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA, 143
A thick, broadly ovate, imperforate species, with fine spiral im-
pressed strize and short conical spire. Color different shades of
chestnut-brown, white, corneous, fulvous, frequently with from one
to four transverse bands on the body-whorl, and more rarely with
a sutural livid band. Aperture pale fulyous, brownish or white,
and the lip light fulvous or white. Length 10 to 16 mill.
C. paludosa, Garrett.
Ophicardelus paludosus, Garrett, Amer. Jour. Conch., 1872, p.
220, pl. 19, fig. 3.
Cassidula paludosa, Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 114.
Plecotrema paludosa, Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 87.
Melampus paludosus, Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum. (Auric.), iv, p. 527.
A few specimens found in mangrove swamps at Upolu. Com-
mon in the Viti group.
A small, solid, ovate, whitish, yellowish-horn colored, or chestnut-
brown species, with fine, spiral, incised punctured lines and carin-
ated base. Spire convexly conical and more produced than in the
preceding species. Length 8 to 10 mill.
PYTHIA, Bolten.
P. tortuosa, Mousson.
Pythia tortuosa, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1871, p. 19, pl. 3, fig.
6. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 114. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff, v, p. 87.
Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum. (Auric.), iv, p. 359. Nevill, List. Moll. Ind.
Mus., p. 221. Cox, Proce. Lin. Soc. N.S. W., 1881, p. 618.
Common on the margins of mangrove swamps at Upolu. Dr.
Grifte collected examples at Futuna and Wallis Island in the
northern part of the Tonga group.
This species which ranges from 18 to 25 mill. in length, is luteous
horn-color, with small irregular chestnut-brown maculations ; some-
times uniform chestnut-black or corneous, and the varices are spot-
ted with dark chestnut and white. The base is either imperforated
or rimate. The aperture is luteous, rarely brownish, and the peri-
stome is usually mottled. The columellar fold is generally contin-
uous with the basal portion of the peristome, and the lower parietal
plait is simple.
P. Savaiensis, Mousson.
Pythia pantherina, A. Adams, var. Uveana, Mousson, Jour. de
Conch., 1865, p. 177. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., iii, p. 28. Pease,
Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 477. Paetal, Cat. Conch., p. 114. Pfeiffer,
144 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [ 1887.
Mon. Pneum. (Auric.), iv, p. 348. Cox, Proc. Lin. Soc., N. 8. W.,
1881, p. 607.
Pythia Savaiensis, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 345; 1870,
p. 135. Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 477. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus.
Godeff., v, p. 87. Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum. (Auric.), iv, p. 341. Cox.
Proc. Lin. Soe. N.S. W., 1881, p. 613. Nevill, List, Moll. Ind. Mus.
p. 223.
This species was found at Savaii by Dr. Graffe. I gathered
numerous examples at Wallis Island and in the Viti group. In
forests near the sea-shore.
A solid, ovate, umbilicated (rarely imperforate), species 21 to 28
mill. long, of a corneous or yellowish-horn color, mottled with chest-
nut, rarely uniform light or dark chestnut and the varices spotted
with white. Aperture luteous.
A larger and more solid shell than the preceding species.
AURICULA, Lamarck.
A. subula, Quoy and Gaimard.
Auricula subula, Quoy and Gaimard, Voy. Astrol., ii, p. 171, pl
13, figs. 39, 40. Deshayes, Lam. Hist., viii, p. 334. Kistaw Aurie.,
p. 58, pl. 8, figs. 9, 10. Jay, Cat. Shells, 1850, p. 265. A. Adare and
Reeve, Voy. Samarang, p. 55, pl. 14,-fig. 15, with animal. Pfeiffer,
Auric., no. 147; Mon. Auric.,i, p. 141. Gassies, Faun. Nouv. Caled.,
p- 69. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 115.
Pythia subula, Beck, er Moll., p. 104.
Ellobium subula, H. and A. rene Proc. Zool. Soc., 1854, Ome fe
Gen. Moll., 11, p. 257
Auricula elongata, “Parreyss” Kuster, Auric., p. 53, pl. 8, figs. 6-
9. Jay, Cat. Shells, 1850, p. 264. Pfeiffer, Auric., no. 146; Mon.
Auric., i, p. 140. Morelet, Ser. Conch., p. 98. Mousson, Jour. de
Conch., 1871, p. 18. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 115. Schmeltz, Cat.
Mus. Godeff., v, p. 88.
Auricula Buddii, Parreyss, MS.
Ellobium elongatum, H. and. A. Adams, Proc. Zool. Soe., 1854, p.
9; Gen. Moll., ii, p. 237.
sae ee Oparicum, H. and A. Adams, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1854, p.
; Gen. Moll., ii, p. 237.
gore icula Oparica, Pfeifter, ‘Mon. Auric.,i p. 1389; Syn. Auric.,
no. 46; Novit. Conch., i, p. 28, pl. 7, figs. 14 128
Aur ee subulus, Pfeiffer, Mon. Pac (Auric.), iv, p. 360.
Auriculus elongatus, Pfeiffer, 1. ¢.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 145
sf
Ariculus Oparicus, Pfeiffer, 1. ¢.
A few small examples found on the margin of a swamp at Upolu.
It occurs in the Tonga and Viti Islands and ranges west as far as
the East Indies. Morelet records it from the island of Mauritius.
A small species, 9 to 16 mill. long, of a slender fusiform shape,
smooth, shining surface, acute conical spire (which is frequently
truncated by erosion); color white beneath an epidermis which va-
ries from pale olivaceous-horn color to chestnut-black. The body
whorl is narrow, usually longer than the spire, attenuated or round-
ed at the base, and the columella is furnished with two, small, ap-
proximating, oblique folds. A compressed subtransverse plait on
the lower part of the parietal region.
S. semiseulpta, H.and A. Adains.
Ellobium semiseulptum, H. and A. Adams, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1854,
p- 9; Gen. Moll. ii, p. 237.
Auricula semisculpta, Pfeifter, Syn. Auric., no. 139; Mon. Auric.,
1, p. 186; Novit, Conch., i, p. 39. pl. 10, figs. 7-9. Gassies, Faun.
Nouv. Caled., p. 70, pl. 3, fig. 11. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v,
p. 88.
Auriculus semisculptus, Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum. (Auric.), iv, p. 359.
A few dead specimens of small size found on the margin of a
mangrove swamp at Upolu. It is also common at Wallis Island
and very abundant and of large size at the Viti group, where they
were found buried in rotten logs in swamps.
This species varies considerably in shape, thickness, and in size,
ranging from 12 to 30 mill. in leneth. The surface is shining, longi-
tudinally striated, and the upper portions of the whorls are sculp-
tured by crowded spiral rows of minute granules, which, in the
adult sometimes cover the whole surface of the body-whorl. The
shape of the shell varies from oblong-ovate to oblong-turreted, the
spire more or less produced, and the color is white beneath a ful-
vous-yellow or yellowish-horn colored epidermis. The parietal re-
gion exhibits a prominent, compressed, oblique fold and just beneath
is a smaller and more vertical one on the columella.
TRUNCATELLA, Risso.
T. valida, Pfeiffer.
Truncatella valida, Pfeiffer, Zeit. Malak., 1846, p. 182; Mon.
Auric., (appendix), 1, p. 184. Jay, Cat. Shells, 1854, p. 253. Kuster,
Mon., p. 11, pl. 2, figs. 7, 8, 19-21, 23. H.and A. Adams, Gen. Moll,
146 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [ 1887.
li, p. 311. Martens, Ostas. Zool., ii, p. 262. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p.
118. Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 477.
Truncatella Vitiana, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1847, p.
208; Exp. Exp. Shells, p. 109, fig. 126; Otia, Conch., p. 40. H.
and A. Adams, Gen. Moll, ii, p. 6. Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869,
p- 856; 1870, p. 195. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 118. Schmeltz, Cat.
Mus. Godeff., v, p. 104.
Truncatella Vitiacea, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 185.
Taheitia Vitiana, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 477.
Truncatella conspicua, “Bronn,” Pfeiffer, Mon. Auric. (appendix),
i, p. 184. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p.118. Layard, Cat. Land and Fresh-
water Shells, N. Caled., p. 1.
Common just above high-water mark in sheltered places. It
occurs also in Tonga, Ellis and Viti groups, and is diffused through-
out Melanesia and the East India Islands.
A solid, slightly tapering, cylindrical shell, of a white, luteous,
corneous, or ruddy corneous color, with 43 slightly convex persist-
ent whorls. The sculpture consists of nearly erect, obtuse ribs (25
to 85), on the body whorl. Peristome slightly auriculate at the
suture. Length 6 to 8 mill.
MOUSSONIA, 0. Semper.
M. typica, 0. Semper.
Pupa problematica, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 176.
Moussonia typiea, O. Semper, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 296.
Crosse, Jour. de Conch., 1866, p. 354, pl. 10, fig. 9. Pease, Proc.
Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 476. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 118. Schmeltz, Cat.
Mus. Godeff., v, p. 102. |
Paxillus (Moussonia) typica, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p.
305.
Diplommatina problematica (Moussonia), Stoliezka, Jour. Asiat.
Soc., 1871, p. 156. (Moussonia), Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum. iv, p. 92.
A minute conical, dark colored species with turreted spire, 7 ob-
liquely costulate whorls and small, rounded aperture and a columella
tooth.
Found at Upolu by Dr. Griiffe.
OSTODES, Gould.
O. tiara. Gould.
Jyclostoma tiara, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soe. Nat. Hist., 1847, p.
204; Exp. Exp. Shells, p. 101, fig. 116.
id
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 147
Cyclophorus tiara, Pfeifter, Consp. Cyclos., no. 116; Mon. Pneum.,
i, p. 84. Gray, Cat. Phan., p. 58. Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865,
p- 179; (Ostodes) 1869, p. 350. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 120.
Ostodes tiara, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1862, p. 240.
Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 475.
* Not uncommon at Upolu, where it was found at an altitude of
“1.000 metres” by Dr. Graffe.
Its large size (18 to 20 mill. in diam.), depressed turbinate form,
dull greyish-horn color beneath a luteous, or horn-colored epider-
mis, 5 convex whorls, the last one subcarinated, and the fine spiral
lirations will readily distinguish it.
0. strigatus, Gould.
Cyclostoma strigatum, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1847, p.
204; Exp. Exp. Shells, p. 102, fig. 117. Chemn. ed. 2d. p. 302, pl.
40, figs. 15, 16.
Cyclophorus strigatus, Pfeiffer, Consp. Cyclos., no. 115; Mon.
Pneum., i, p. 83. Gray, Cat. Phan., p. 58. H. and A. Adams, Gen.
Moll., ii, p. 280. Reeve, Conch. Icon., pl. 14, fig. 58. Mousson, Jour.
de Conch., 1865, p. 179; (Ostodes), 1869, p. 350. Paetel, Cat. Conch.,
p. 120. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff:, v, p. 99.
Ostodes. strigatus, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist. 1861, p.
283.
Cyclostoma plicatum, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1847, p.
205; Exp. Exp. Shells, p. 103, fig. 118.
Cyclophorus plicatus, Pfeiffer, Consp. Cyclos., no. 114; Mon.
Pneum., iv, p. 115. Reeve, Conch. Icon., pl., 14, fig. 58. ( Ostodes)
Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 350.
Ostodes plicatus, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1861, p. 283.
Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 475.
Cyclostoma Apic, Recluz, Jour. de Conch., 1851, p. 213, pl. 6,
figs. 10, 10.
Cyclophorus Apice, Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum., i, p. 83. Gray, Cat.
Phan., p. 57. H. and A. Adams, Gen. Moll., ii, p. 279. Paetel, Cat.
Conch., p. 119.
Cyclostoma pulverulentum, Philippi, Chemnitz, ed. 2d. p. 301, pl.
40, figs. 15, 14.
Cyclophorus pulverulentus, Pfeiffer, Consp. Cyclos., no. 114.
Cyclostoma albida, Hombron and Jacquinot, Voy. Pol. Sud. Zool.,
v, p. 50, pl. 12, figs. 25-28.
148 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
Cyclophorus ? albidus, Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum., ii, p. 60.
Abundant beneath decaying vegetation at Upolu, Tutuila and
Savaii.
This variable species may be recognized by its rude solid texture,
more or less globose form, cinereous, or ruddy-horn color, 5 convex
whorls, the last one rounded and more or less distinctly angulated on
the margin of the moderate umbilicus. The sculpture consists of
spiral, irregular, elevated lines which are frequently evanescent on
the last whorl, and in the form known as plicatus, Gld., have the
whorls transversely obliquely plicated. The spire is more or less
elevated. The diameter varies from 8 to 12 mill.
0. Upolensis, Mousson.
Cyclophorus Upolensis, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 180;
( Ostodes) 1869, p. 352. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 120. Pfeiffer, Mon.
Pneum., iv, p. 115. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 99.
Ostodes Upolensis, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 475.
Common beneath decaying vegetation at Upolu.
A small, thin, whitish, depressed, conoid species with 43 convex
whorls. the last one rounded or slightly angulated, and all with
spiral elevated lines; sometimes the whorls are rudely plicated.
The umbilicus is large and the margin is angulated.
Diam. 72 mill.
0. adjunctus, Mousson.
Cyclophorus (Ostodes) adjunctus, Mousson, Jour. de Conch.,
1869, p. 351, pl. 14, fig. 9. Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum., iv, p. 114.
Ostodes adjunctus, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 475.
Found at Tutuila by Dr. Griiffe.
This species is widely umbilicated, rather solid, depressly-conical,
whitish, with 43 slightly convex whorls, the last one carinated, and
all with spiral elevated lines. Diam. 9 mill.
0. ? Brazieri, Cox.
Cyclostoma Brazieri, Cox, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1870, p. 85.
Cyclotus ? Brazieri, Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum., iv, p. 36.
This species, which is unknown to me, was found by Mr, Brazier
at Upolu.
The following is Cox’s description as given by Mr. Pfeiffer :—
“Testa pyramidata; spira acuta et elevata, apice rosea, anfr. 5,
rotundati, sub lente subtilissima spiraliter striati; saturate cinna-
momia; sutura profunda; umbilicus augustus et profundus; aper-
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 149
tura circularis; perist. simplex vix incrassatum. Operculum soli-
dum extus perconcavum, marginibus anfractuum prominentibus.
Lat. 0.13, alt. 16 poll.”
Genus OMPHALOTROPIS, Pfeiffer.
0. conidea, Mousson.
Omphalotropis conoidea, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 182.
Pease. Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 146; Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p.
476. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 124. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff, v, p.
101,
Realia ( Omphalotropis) conoidea, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869,
p- 353 (et var. angulosa) ; 1871, p. 27. Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum., iv,
p. 222.
I am not acquainted with this species, which was found at Upolu
by Dr. Griffe, and the variety at Savaii. He found it also at
Wallis Island.
An ovate conical species, 7 mill. long, with 63 rather flattened
whorls, the last one large, ovately-rounded, perforated, and the per-
foration margined by a filiform keel. Moussson says “epidermide
subdestituta, punctis et lineis fulguratis saepe reticularis malleata.”
In his remarks (Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 146) he says “Les jeunes
individus, d’un rouge grisatre et peu fulgurés, sont, en effet, parfai-
tement lisses; mais bientét on découvre des points d’une coloration
blanchatre et mate, qui interrompent les parties polies et se dis-
posent en lignes anguleuses, qui finissent par dominer 4 lage ou
l’ épiderme est entirément détruit.”
His variety angulata has the last whorl angular.
O. bilirata, Mousson.
Omphalotropis bilirata, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 184,
pl. 14, fig. 13. Pease, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 146; Proc. Zool.
Soc., 1871, p. 476.
Realia ( Omphalotropis) bilirata, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869,
p. 146 (var. elongata); 1871, p. 29. Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum., iv, p.
218.
More rare than the preceding species and inhabits Upolu and
Savaii, as well as Wallis Island in the Tonga group.
A perforated, elongate-conical, pale corneous species with an in-
cised sutural line which is margined above with a filiform keel.
Whorls 6, flattened, the last one angulated and bicarinated with a
periphery and basal thread-like keel. Length 52 mill.
150 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
0. bifilaris, Mousson.
Omphalotropis bifilaris, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 183.
Pease, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 146; Proc, Zool. Soc., 1871, p.
476. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 124. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p.
104:
Realia (Omphalotropis) bifilaris, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869,
p. 353 (var. angusta); 1871, p. 29. Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum., iv, p.
232.
Not infrequent at Upolu and Tutuila; found also at the Tonga
group. Mousson’s variety angusta which inhabits the Viti Islands
is probably a distinct species. —
The type is a perforated, conical shell, 6$ mill. long, with a fuga-
ceous fuscous epidermis and rounded whorls, the last one with a
periphery and basal filiform keel.
HELICINA., Lamarck.
H. fulgora, Gould.
Helicina fulgora, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1847, p. 201;
Exp. Exp. Shells, p. 95, fig. 106. Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum., i. p. 401.
Gray, Cat. Phan., p. 293. H. and A. Adams, Gen. Moll., ii, p. 302;
Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 178; 1869, p. 356; 1870, p. 198
(var. expansa); 1871, p. 25 (var. diminuta). Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc.,
1871, p. 476. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 125. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus.
Godetf.. v, p. 98 (var. delicatula).
Helicina delicatula, “Mss.” Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 125.
Abundant beneath decaying vegetation and is diffused throughout
the group. The variety delicatula is common at Samoa, and
Mousson’s diminuta is widely spread over the Tonga group. Vari-
ety expansa inhabits Kanathia, one of the Viti Islands.
This variable species may be recognized by its conoid form, thin
texture, oblique striation, yellowish horn-color and radiating angu-
lar or flexuous rufous strigations. Sometimes the stripes are inter-
rupted so as to form a series of spots along the sutural line and on
the acutely carinated periphery. The peristome is slightly expanded
and forms an angle at its junction with the short columella.
Diam. 4 to 9 mill.
H., plicatilis, Mousson.
Helicina plicatilis, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 178; 1869,
p- 358. Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 476. Paetel, Cat. Conch.,
p- 126. Brazier, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 322. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus.
Godeff., v, p. 98. Pfeiffer, Mon. Reunion, iv, p. 251.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 151
Common on trees at Upolu.
A large, solid, white? depressly conical species, with 43 depressed
whorls, the last one wide, obtusely angular, or bluntly carinated on
the periphery. The peristome is sharp, and in adult individuals
the anterior margin of the basal cellosity forms a crest-like ridge
which joins the base of the outer-lip. Diam. 9 mill.
Mr. Brazier (in P. Z.8., 1871, p. 322), says Mousson’s plicatilis
is synonymous with Pfeiffer’s H. Norfolkensis, and that Cuming’s
locality “Norfolk Island” is erroneous. Though the species has
several years precedence in publication, and, if they are identical,
Mr. Brazier is fully justified in rejecting Pfeiffer’s name which is a
misnomer.
The description of Norfolkensis agrees very nearly with the Samoa
shell, but no mention is made of the peculiar crest-like basal ridge.
The measurements are too large for the latter species.
H. beryllina, Gould.
Helicina beryllina, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1847, p.
202; Exp. Exp. Shells, p. 95, fig. 111. Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum., i, p.
354." Gray, Cat. Phan., p. 256. (Idesa) H. and A. Adams, Gen.
Moll. ii, p.504. Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 197; 1869, p.
307 (var. flavida); 1870, p. 200. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 125. Pease,
Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 476. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p.
98.
Gould’s typical bery/lina inhabits the eastern portion of the Viti
Islands, and Mousson’s var. flavida was found at Tutuila by Dr.
Graffe. The latter variety has the spire and base yellowish, the
last whorl whitish with a yellowish zone. In every other respect it
differs none from the Vitian type, which is a large species (9 to 10
mill. in diam.), of a solid texture, depressly conoid in shape and
rather variable in color: white, greenish-white, flesh-color, frequently
with a dorsal red zone. Lip simple and the periphery obtuse.
‘H. interna, Mousson.
Helicina interna, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 358; 1870,
p- 201, pl. 8, fig. 6; 1871, p. 24. Puaetel, Cat. Conch., p. 125.
Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 99. Pfeiffer. Mon. Pneum., iv, p.
248. Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 476.
This species, which is common to the Viti and Tonga Islands,
was found by Dr. Griiffe at Savaii.
A turbinately conical species of a uniform white, or yellowish
color, with or without a spiral reddish-brown zone and regular coni-
152 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887..
cal spire. Whorls 5, slightly convex, the last one rounded or ob-
tusely angulated. Peristome acute. Diam. 9 mill.
H. musiva, Gould.
Helicina musiva, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1847, p.
201; Expl. Exp. Shells, p. 98, fig. 107. Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum., 1,
p- 368. Gray, Cat. Phan., p. 259. H. and A. Adams, Gen. Moll., ii,
p- 302. Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 175 (var. Uveana); 1869,
p- 357; 1870, p. 202 (vars. Vitiana et subcarinata); 1871, p. 25;
1873, p. 107 (var. rotundata). Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., bide p. 476.
Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 125 (musica in err.).
This variable species is abundant beneath decaying vegetation
on the lowlands near the sea-shore. It is also common in the Tonga
and Viti Islands as well as in the low coral islands of Ellis group.
The shape varies from depressed globose to sub-lenticular, and,
in size varies from 3 to 5 mill. in diameter. The usual color is
white, corneous, or pale yellowish horn-color with radiating reddish-
chestnut more or less zigzagged or undulating stripes, rarely unicolor.
The periphery is rounded, or subangulated and the peristome align:
ly expanded.
H. altivaga, Mousson.
Helicina altivaga, “Mousson” Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff, v, p-
99.
This species, which was neither described nor figured, was found
at Upolu, by Dr. Graffe.
ASSIMINEA, Leach.
A. nitida, Pease.
Hydrocena nitida, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1864, p. 674.
Assiminea nitida, Pease, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 165, pl. 7, fig.
11; Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 476. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v,
p- 103. Garrett, Proc. Phil. Acad. Nat. Sci., 1879, p. 29; Jour.
Phil. Acad. Nat. Sci., 1881, p. 408.
? Realia nitida, Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum., iii, p. 202.
Hydrocena parvula, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 184; 1873,
p. 108.
Omphalotropis parvula, Pease, Jour, de Conch., 1869, p. 155;
Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 476. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 124.
Assiminea parvula, Pease, Proc. Zool, Soc., 1871, p. 476. Schmeltz,
Cat. Mus. Godeff, v, p. 103.
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 153
Realia parvula, Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum., iii, p. 213.
Assiminea lucida, Pease, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 166, pl. 7, fig.
10; Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 476.
Assiminea ovata, “Pease” Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 103.
Hydrocena pygmea, Gassies, Jour. de Conch., 1867, p. 63.
Assiminea pygmea, Pease, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 165.
? Realia pygmea, Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum., iv, p. 214.
Hydrocena similis, Baird, in Cruise of the Curacoa.
This species is distributed throughout all the groups from the
Paumotu’s to the Viti Islands and New Caledonia. They are found
beneath decaying leaves, under stones and dead wood.
It may be recognized by its small size (2+ to 4 mill. long), smooth,
shining surface, ovate-conical form, light or dark corneous color ;
rarely with a faint transverse band on the last whorl.
11
154 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
May 3.
Mr. THos. MEEHAN, Vice-President, in the chair.
Twenty-three persons present.
On Aphyllon as a root Parasite—Mr. Thomas Meehan remarked
that the life histories of many of our root parasites were still obscure,—in
many cases we hardly knew whether they were annual or perennial ;
how long it took for them to perfect themselves, and in some cases it
was even doubted whether they were parasites in the true sense of
the word, or merely obtained a start by feeding on partially decom-
posed vegetable matter. In one of the earlier editions of Flora Ces-
trica, Dr. Wm. Darlington observes that he has often dug Aphyl-
lon uniflorum without finding it attached to anything,—and, though
he omits this remark in later editions, he observes that it is ‘‘Per-
ennial?” The speaker remarked that he had dug this species very
carefully when in bloom, and washed the earth gently away, finding
them truly parasitic on the coarser fibres of Asters and Goldenrods.
They very readily separate from their connection unless carefully
handled, which may account for the failure to note their true para-
sitic nature.
A specimen sent by Mr. Morris, a florist of Des Moines Iowa, of
an allied species A. fasciculatum Torr. and G., (Phelipea fasciculata of
some authors), gives the opportunity for acquiring certain knowledge in
relation to these points. Mr. Morris raised numerous plants of the
common bedding geranium (Pelargonium zonale). ‘The cuttings
were made in October and November last. They were potted in
earth taken from a piece of newly cleared woodland in the vicin-
ity. The plants appeared in many of the geranium pots in his green-
house, and were in full flower in April. As the plants were only
in this soil for about three months, the seeds must have sprouted,
flowered, and were on the decline in that time. They are therefore
annual, and a very short-lived annual at that.
In regard to the parasitism, the attachment in several that Mr.
Meehan had examined, was to the coarser roots. In the plant ex-
hibited, it was to the main stem of the cuttings beneath the ground,
and not to the roots, which in this specimen were merely weak fibres.
The geranium, an African plant, and of a very different character
from these which the Aphyllon has been in the habit of feeding on,
proving so acceptable to it in this instance, shows that it is either
not partial in its parasitic tastes, or that it has ready powers of
adaptation when something suited to its peculiar habits comes along.
May 10.
The President, Dr. JosepH Letpy, in the chair.
Twenty persons present.
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 155
The following was presented for publication :-—
“Contributions towards a Synopsis of the American forms of Fresh-
Water Sponges with Descriptions of those named by other authors
and from all parts of the world.,’ By Edw. Potts.
The death of Robert H. Hare, a member, was announced.
On the Stipules of Magnolia Frazeri—Mr. Thomas Meehan exhib-
ited some fresh flowers of Magnolia Frazeri, Walter—(CM. auriculata,
Lamarck), and said that when he contributed the paper on the
“Stipules of Magnolia and Liriodendron” to the Proceedings of the
Academy in 1870, he had not had the opportunity to examine fresh
flowers of this species. It was not common in cultivation from the
fact that the plants grown rarely produced seeds, and there had
been little opportunities to get seeds from its North Carolina home.
On his grounds of late years a specimen had annually borne flowers,
which appeared very early, following immediately the flowers of the
Yulan, and were as large and sweet as that species of China.
A point made in the | paper referred to was that the petals of Mag-
nolia were not modified leaves, as the petals of flowers would be
broadly stated to be in morphological works but rather modified
stipules, in which case the petiole and leaf blade have wholly abor-
ted. At the time of its appearance, Dr. Asa Gray, to whose kindly
criticisms on thisand other papers he had been so often deeply indebted,
wrote expressing his interest in the paper, saying that the obser-
vations confirmed the views of some German observer, whose name
he could not recall, that the petals of many flowers were but modi-
fied stipules.
Mr. Meehan had not been able to meet with the name of the
author or of the paper referred to by Dr. Gray, or the tenor of the
author’s views. Indeed his observations and those of the author
referred to, must have been wholly overlooked by their co-laborers,
or else the views have not commended themselves to their good
judgment. For his own part the subsequent observations of nearly
twenty years had convinced him that the petals of most flowers
should be considered enlarged stipules or thinly dilated bases
of petioles, rather than modified leaves, as we should understand
this term. In many species of Roses, especially in Rosa Kamtcha-
tica, and Rosa cinnamomea the stipules could be noted increasing,
and the size of the leaf blade diminishing on the branch as it ap-
proached inflorescence. Often the tips of the sepals would develop
to minute leaf blades, and in a few instances he had had seen the same
appendages on abnormal petals. Often the stipules, especially in
Rosa Kamtchatica, would have the red colors of the petals, when at
the nodes immediately below the axis from which the peduncle pro-
ceeded. There could be no possible doubt in the minds of those who
would carefully compare, and watch for occasional aberrations, that
the petals of the rose were rather transformed stipules than complete
leaves. Precisely the same process of development from stipules to
156 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
petals could be traced in some Leguminose, and especially in the
common Red Field Clover.
When vegetation was arrested in its growth and bud scales were
formed for the protection of the growth-germ for the next season,
it was the stipule or dilated base of the petiole that formed the scale.
This was evident to those who watched the bursting of the growth
buds in spring of the species of Fraxinus, or of the Dwarf Horse
Chestnut (Aesculus parviflora) common in gardens.
The formation of petals for the protection of the reproductive
germ, was also the result of arrested vegetative growth, and we may
safely assume that the same law operates on the stipules and petiolar
bases, in the one case as in the other.
This Magnolia confirms these views, as already indicated in the
paper referred to. The stipules increase in size, and the develop-
ment of the leaf blade is arrested just in proportion as the true
petals are approached, until the last one preceding the true flower
is nearly as large as the petals, and of nearly their form and char-
acter. Insome cases the stipule appears as a perfect petal, with not a
of leaf blade left. The true sepal or petal has lost all trace of petiole
or blade,—it is broadened at the base, and, we see, cannot be aught
but the stipule modified.
The fact that the petals of flowers are rather the bases of petioles
or stipules, than modifications of full typical leaves may not only be
proved by such observations as have been referred to, but accords
with that philosophy which would expect to find an uniform law
result from uniform causes. For if, as cannot be doubted, the check
vegetative growth produce petal a bud scale out of a stipule, the
check to vegetative growth should produce a petal (a flower scale) out
of the same typical form. The theory givesto morphological law
a harmony of action that is wanting without it.
Maw ai.
Mr. J. H. REDFIELD, in the chair.
Twenty-eight persons present.
May 24.
Mr. Cuas. Morris, in the chair.
Twenty-nine persons present.
A paper entitled “Notes on the Anatomy of Echidna hystrix.”
By H. C. Chapman M. D., was presented for publication.
Permission was given to change the name of a communication
presented October 19, 1886, by Prof. Wm. B. Scott, for publication
in the Journal of the Academy, from “The Genera Mesonyx and
Pachyaena, Cope.” to “On some new and little-known Creodonts.”
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 157
May 31.
The President, Dr. JosepH Lerpy, in the chair.
Twelve persons present.
Asplanchna Ebbesbornii.—Dr. Leidy remarked that a few days
ago Mr. Wm. P. Seal, had submitted to him a four ounce bottle
swarming with animalcules, which at first glance he supposed to be
a species of Cypris, but on closer inspection he observed to be a rotifer.
As seen with the naked eye they appeared transparent whitish, and
of conical shape and about half a line in length. They swam ac-
tively, with the crown uppermost, and at all levels of the® water.
The rotifer accords closely with the description of Asplanchna
Ebbesbornii, given by Hudson in the Journal of the Royal Micro-
scopical Society i in 1883, p. 621, pl. ix, x. As in this it has a dor-
sal and ventral projection. At ‘times it was observed that the rotifer
would retract the crown and project a pair of lateral conical horns,
when it would appear as broad as it was long. The stomach is yel-
lowish and suspended from the pharynx by a long narrow cesopha-
gus. There wasa single eye. The animal is viviparous, and was
observed in a number of instances to suddenly give birth to a young
one which was about two thirds the size of the parent. and resem-
bled it in form. Specimens measured from 7 to 13 mm in length.
Mr. Hudson’s specimens were obtained from a duck- -pond in Wilt-
shire, England, the only known locality. Mr. Seal’s specimens were
obtained from a “filthy sewage-fed pond,—a duck-pond and hog-wal-
low” below the city. In summer it is completely covered with duck
weed, Lemna. The water swarms with the rotifer in company with
Daphnia. My.Seal remarks that he noticed sand pipers about the
place and thinks these birds are especially instrumental in distrib-
uting the lower forms of aquatic life.
The following were elected correspondents :—
Henry A. Ward of Rochester, Addison E. Verrill of New Haven,
R. P. Whitfield of New York, Edgar A. Smith of London, August
Brot of Geneva, E. Ray Lankester of London, William E. Hoyle
of Edinburgh, Eduard von Martens of Berlin, William Kobelt of
Schwanheim, S. Clessin of Ochsenfurt, Rev. M. Heude, S. J. of
Zika—Wei, China, Rudolph Bergh of Copenhagen, A. T. de Roche-
brune of Paris and Herrman Friele of Bergen.
The following were ordered to be printed :—
158 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
CONTRIBUTIONS TOWARDS A SYNOPSIS OF THE AMERICAN FORMS
OF FRESH WATER SPONGES WITH DESCRIPTIONS OF THOSE
NAMED BY OTHER AUTHORS AND FROM ALL PARTS
OF THE WORLD.
BY EDWARD POTTS.
Dr. Bowerbank’s “Monograph of the Spongillidze,” (Proce. Zool.
Soc., London, 1863 p. 440 ete.) and “The History and Classification
of the known species of Spongilla,” by H. J. Carter Esq. F. R. 8.
etc. (Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist., London, 1881, p. 77 ete.)
contain the only complete synopses of the fresh water sponges, as
known at their respective dates. Both writers have, in their
introductory remarks, given full information as to the history and
bibliography of this branch of study, which it cannot be necessary
now to repeat.
My design in the preparation of the present paper has been,
primarily, to describe those genera and species, mostly North
American, that have been discovered since the date of Mr. Carter’s
publication; next, to detail the results of a somewhat extended
examination into the character and variations, in North America,
of those species that have long been familiarly known in Europe;
and thirdly, to make it valuable for reference as a Monograph, by
adding brief technical descriptions of all other “good” species.
A further purpose, and one that I hold much at heart, is the
desire to revive, among scientists and lovers of nature, an apprecia-
tion of the apparently almost forgotten fact of the existence of sponges
in our fresh water; to show them that they are easily found and
collected; that they are deeply interesting as living subjects of study,
microscopic and otherwise; and that, by simple processes, their typ-
ical parts may readily be prepared for classification and the
permanent preservation of their various singular forms. With this
end in view the situations and conditions in which the American
species were found, have been briefly described, suggesting the hope-
fulness of an exploration of similar localities in other neighborhoods.
During the last six or seven years the leisure time of a very busy
life has been largely occupied in the collection and examination
of sponge material. In this labor of love I have been greatly aided
by the contributions and correspondence of friends, till then
unknown, in widely separated districts, for whose thoughtful kindness
¢
PROC. ACAD. NAT. SCI. PHILA. 1887, Peer
ey me
“ay, fo
Moe We Me MG D>
ee.
Dr. C. W. deLannoy, del.
POTTS ON FRESH WATER SPONGES.
PROG, ACAD, NAT. SCI. PHILA, 1887, Pie VE
POTTS ON FRESH WATER SPONGES,
PROC. ACAD. NAT. SCI. PHILA, 1887. PL. VIL.
V
S. G. Foulke, del.
POTTS ON FRESH WATER SPONGES.
PROC. ACAD. NAT. SCI. PHILA. 1887. PL. VIII.
POTTS ON FRESH WATER SPONGES.
PL. IX.
PROC, ACAD. NAT. SCI. PHILA. 1887,
del.
ulke,
Si (Gi. Fo
POTTS ON FRESH WATER SPONGES.
PL. X.
PROC. ACAD. NAT. SCI. PHILA. 1887.
k Mi Ws
a .
rent
S WwW
- \
S. G. Foulke, del.
POTTS ON FRESH WATER SPONGES.
PROC. ACAD. NAT. SCI. PHILA, 1887. PL. XL.
S. G. Foulke, del.
POTTS ON FRESH WATER SPONGES.
PROG. ACAD. NAT. SCI. PHILA. 1887, PL. XII.
POTTS ON FRESH WATER SPONGES,
1887. | NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 159
I now desire to express my indebtedness. It were idle to attempt to
name them all; but to Professors Allen, Cope, Hunt, Leidy and
Heilprin of Philadelphia, to Dawson, Hyatt, Bumpus and Osborn
in other localities, I am particularly indebted. As active workers
in the same field and during nearly the same period, I am glad to
acknowledge my constant obligation to my friends Mr. Henry Mills,
of Buffalo, N. Y. and Mr. B. W. Thomas of Chicago, Ill., whose
names will frequently be found throughout the following pages.
More recently my valued friend and correspondent Mr. A. H. Mac-
Kay, of Pictou, Nova Scotia, has been untiring in his efforts, very
successful in his local and New Foundland collections and most
generous in the contribution of his valuable material. I owe to my
friend Prof. John A. Ryder of the University of Pennsylvania, what
has been of more value than any material, the most unfailing courtesy
and the best of advice, assistance and encouragement to persevere
in my work. From abroad I have been honored with the correspon-
dence and publications of Dr. W. Dybowski of Niankow, Russia,
Prof. Marshall of Leipsig, Vejdovsky and Petr of Prague, Bohemia.
Prof. Vejdovsky has laid me under especial obligations by his repeated
gifts of Bohemian and other European sponges, besides his “Diagnosis
of the European Spongillidae” now published as a very valuable
contribution to this paper. I thank Dr. C. W. de Lannoy, late of
Chester, Pennsylvania, for the original drawings for plates V aud
VI the excellence of which will be conceded by all acquainted
with the subjects.
Two names remain of friends, without whose influence and assis-
tance this Monograph would probably never have been written.
The first has passed the alloted term of “three score years and ten,”
and now, with failing strength, but unfailing love of his work, is
hastening to garner the last ripe sheayes of a life of honorable scien-
tific labor. I count it a great privilege to have become acquainted,
near the beginning of my work, with H. J. Carter, Esq. of
Devonshire, England, than whom no obscure scientist could hope
for a more constant friend or more courteous correspondent. To
the fine artistic skill and unwearying patience of the other, Miss 8.
G. Foulke of Philadelphia, my readers, with myself, owe a large
part of the value of this work, in the admirable drawings from
which plates VII to XII have been reproduced.
These reproductions are the work of the Photo-Engraving Co.
(N. Y.) and while it is regretted that from the very nature of the
160 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
process no photo-engraved plate could repeat, with their relative
delicacy, the finer lines of Miss Foulke’s beautiful drawings, in other
respects they are very well done.
A few words of elementary information may be desirable to aid
those who for the first time undertake the study of sponges.
In constitution and general appearence the fresh water sponges
resemble many of those of a marine habitat, excepting in one
particular. This crucial point is the presence, during certain resting
seasons, in most of the former, and the absence from all the latter,
of those “seed-like bodies” that have been known and described
by various authors under the names of ovaria, gemmules, statoblasts,
statospheres, sphzerule, etc. In the past I have generally avoided
the use of the familiar word statoblast, as it did not seem clearly
proven that the function of these “seed like bodies” of the sponges
was identical with that of the statoblasts of the polyzoa ete; and
have used the terms statospheres, or spherule, as suggesting
merely their general appearance. Latterly, however, I have con-
curred with several European writers in the use of the old term,
gemmules; the principal objection to which, is that with some persons
the name may seem like a return to the exploded vegetable theory
of sponges. It is hardly necessary to say that this idea is not
intended.
In shape these gemmules are neariy spherical; they are about
sy of an inch in diameter, or as large as very small mustard seeds.
They are found sometimes in continuous layers, as at the base of
encrusting sponges; sometimes they rest singly in the interspaces
among the skeleton spicules; again, they occur in groups of a dozen
or less, sparsely scattered through the sponge mass, or in smaller,
denser groups, closely enveloped in a compact cellular parenchyma.
Their principal coat, presumably of chitin, encloses a compact mass
of protoplasmic globules, each of which is charged with numbers of
discoidal particles, whose function, though all important, it is not
my intention to discuss in the present paper. A circular orifice,
rarely more than one, through this chitinous coat, sometimes,
though inaptly called the hilum, should be known as the foramen
or foraminal aperture. Through it, at the time of germination, the
above mentioned protoplasmic bodies make their exit, crawling by
an amceboid movement, and spreading out on every side. In a few
hours the infant colony may be seen producing aqueous currents,
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 161
developing and arranging skeleton spicules, and in every way living
the life of a young sponge. The foraminal aperture is rarely
plain; more frequently it is infundibular, (PI. V, fig. i, a,), having a
slightly raised and expanded margin; while in still other species it
is prolonged into cylindrical or funnel shaped tubules (Pl. VI, fig.
lii, iv, and v.)
In most species, possibly in all under normal conditions, the
chitinous coat is surrounded by a “crust” (Pl. VI, figs. i, ii, ete.),
composed of air cells, often so minute as to be with difficulty
“resolvable,” even with a high power of the microscope; in other
species so large as to be readily discerned by the use of a low one.
In the first instance it has been called a “granular,” in the other, a
“cellular” “crust.” In this are imbedded (PI. V and VI,), the spicules
which, as will be hereafter seen, are relied upon to determine the
generic classification of these sponges.
To recur for a moment to the resemblance stated to exist between
the fresh water and some of the marine sponges,—we can see no
obvious reason why ail the marine forms should not have their
representatives among those belonging to fresh water; but it is a
fact that all of the latter, as yet discovered, are silicious ;—that is, the
skeleton or framework, (corresponding to the elastic fibre of which
commercial sponges are composed) upon which the slime-like sponge
flesh, known as “sarcode,” is supported, and through whose interstices
the currents meander, is composed of silicious spicules, slightly
bound together by an almost invisible quantity of firmer sarcode or
perhaps of colloidal silica.
To form the main lines of this skeleton structure the spicules,
averaging about tooth. of an inch in length, are fasciculated in
bands made up of several spicules, lying side by side, and somewhat
overlapping at their extremities; the crossing lines being formed of
more slender fascicles, or even of single spicules. In the different
species these “skeleton” spicules vary in size, in the shape of their
terminations, and in their more or less spinous character (see Plates
VII to XII, a,a,); but while these differences serve, in some degree, as
specific guides, they are not sufficiently constant or positive to form
a basis for generic arrangement.
Besides the skeleton spicules, a second class, known as “dermal” or
flesh spicules (Pl. VII to XII, ¢, d, e, ete.) is found only in some species
and in greater or less numbers, either lying upon the outer “dermal”
film or lining the canals in the deeper portions of the sponge. They
162 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
are almost always much smaller than those of the skeleton and are
never fasciculated or bound together in any way. A third class of
spicules is composed of those before mentioned as imbedded in the
“crust” of the gemmules, and form what may be regarded as their
armor or defensive coating. These gemmule-spicules represent two
principal and several subordinate types, which have been selected
by Mr. Carter to define the different genera into which he has divi-
ded the single genus Spongilla of the earlier authors. His method
of classification will be given later.
The sponge in its entirety as a growing organism can generally
be easily recognized by the collector, after he has escaped from the
thraldom of the idea that any fixed growth, of a more or less vivid
green color, must be a plant of some kind. Of course the mosses
and confervee will be rejected after examination, upon the evidence
given by the leaves of the one and the smooth slender threads of the
other. If doubts remain as to any specimen, the presence in it of
efferent or discharging apertures, like those of the commercial sponge,
if it is really a sponge, may serve to dispel them, and still more con-
vincing proof will be given by the use of a pocket lens, in detecting
the points of multitudinous spicules thickly studding the surface.
When, in addition to these guiding features, the spherical gemmules
just described are found within or under it, there should be no fur-
ther hesitation.
The green color spoken of, is common and characteristic; yet it
is not universal, but closely dependent upon the quantity or quality
of the light received. When a sponge has germinated away from
the light and has grown upon the lower side of a plank or stone, it will
be found nearly white, gray or cream colored. As it enlarges and
creeps around the edge and up into the full sun light it assumes a
delicate shade of green, deepening as the exposure increases, till it
attains a bright vegetable hue. Even in the sunlight, however,
some species are never green. (See description of Meyenia leidyi.)
These organisms have occasionally been discovered growing in
water unfit for domestic uses; but asa rule they prefer pure water,
and in my experience the finest specimens have always been found
where they were subjected to the most rapid currents. The lower
side of large, loose stones at the “riffs” or shallow places in streams ;
the rocks amid the foaming water at the foot of a mill-dam fall; the
timbers of a sluice-way, the casing of a turbine waterwheel, or
the walls of a “tail race” beneath an old mill;—in all these places
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 163
they have been found in great abundance and of a very lusty growth.
Of all discouraging situations it is almost hopeless to look for them
in shallow water haying a mud bottom. Mud is their great enemy,
as gravity aids their natural currents to fill the cavities with earthy
matters that soon suffocate them, because the latter are too feeble to
throw them off. Of course in any body of water liable to be
charged with sedimentary material, the principle of natural selection
favors those growing on the lower side of their bases of support,
which protect them from the intrusion of the heavier particles.
For that reason perpendicular and water logged or floating timbers,
submerged stumps of trees, and branches drooping into the water
from trees or bushes along the banks, are favorite locations. They
do not disdain more temporary support, such as weeds and water-
grasses. I have received from a friend, specimens growing upon
water plants that wild ducks had torn from the bottom, and that
were found floating upon the surface of Lake Michigan. Through
the clear water of our northern lakes, we may often see them lying
in slender lines upon the leaves of submerged weeds, or in beautiful
cushion-like masses upon the stones or gravel.
In my explorations I have had much satisfaction in the use of a
long pole, to which was attached a small net, with one part of its
edge shaped into a scraper, like a garden hoe. This enabled me to
examine the surface of timbers at a depth of eight or ten feet and to tear
offand bring up sponges from that depth; beyond which all is tomean
“aqua incognita.” Biologists labor at some disadvantage in studying
the fauna of our fresh water, as compared with the facilities offered
them in collecting ocean subjects. The nets and dredges of many
exploring expeditions have, at least, begun to acquaint us with the
inhabitants of the “deep sea;” but who knows anything about the
fauna or the flora of our deep fresh-water lakes, or even of our
larger streams? The largest specimens of this group ever reported,
were dredged from the bottom of Lake Baikal in Central Asia,
(Lubomirskia). I know of no similar attempts to collect them else-
where. It is to be hoped that means may be found ere long to
make such explorations, which must result in an increase of
knowledge in many lines. Meantime no opportunity offered by the
accidental or designed drainage of artificial reservoirs should be
neglected. I have spent hours of great pleasure and profit while
groping around the distributing reservoirs upon Fairmount Hill,
Philadelphia, at times when the water was drawn off for cleaning
or repairs.
164 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [ 1887.
One further point as to methods of collecting and I shall finish
this section of my subject. Unless our sponges are large, it is difficult
to detach them without mutilation, from the rough surfaces of
stones. It is therefore preferable to gather, when possible, those
growing upon wood, which may be scraped or chipped without
injury to them. It is essential to secure the very lowest portions,
as it is there the gemmules often abide.
The proper season for collecting fresh water sponges, in waters of
the temperate zone, depends upon the purpose of the collector. If
it is his desire to gather cabinet specimens merely, for the iden-
tification of old or the determination of novel species, it is hardly
worth while to begin before July. As with the flowering of plants,
the maturity of different species of sponges is attained at various
dates, between mid-summer and late in November. - The essential
point is, that the gemmules and their armature shall be fully
perfected; and when that condition is attained in any specimen,
there is no reason for further delay.
I would, however, recommend to intending students a far higher
object for their ambition ;—that is, the study of the physiology and
life history of sponges as members of a sub-kingdom whose position
has been greatly questioned and whose character, derivation and sub-
sequent evolution are very important and perplexing topics. I
would have such workers search for and examine them at all seasons
of the year, (even in midwinter, when I have never failed in suita-
ble situations to find some in a growing condition), keeping memo-
randa as to each species separately ; noting the date of their germi-
nation or earliest appearance, the locality, elevation, temperature;
rapidity of growth at different seasons; time and manner of forma-
tion of gemmules; stability or decadence during the winter; modes
of distribution and progression, whether always down stream or by
other more adventitious methods; what becomes of the gemmules
upon reaching salt-water, and the thousand and one problems that
go to make up the life history of any animal form, and that, in this
instance, have been very little studied. I am particularly anxious
that some competent person should undertake their study in the
briny, brackish and the fresh water lakes, pertaining to what is
known as the “Great Basin of the West,” with a special view to as-
certain the conditions under which they form “protected gemmules”’
in such localities. By this means, light may possibly be thrown
upon the problem of their possible derivation from the marine sponges.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 165
Great pleasure and profit may be attained in the same direction,
by germinating the statoblasts or gemmules under artificial condi-
tions, and studying the development of the young sponges by the
aid of as high powers of the microscope as the ingenuity of each
student may bring to bear upon the subject. I take the liberty to.
copy from the Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist. 1882, p. 365, Mr. Carter’s
directions for germinating statoblasts, which will be found valuable.
“To obtain the young spongille it is only necessary to get a portion
of an old living specimen bearing statoblasts, and, having taken
out a few (six to twelve) of the latter, to roll them gently between
the folds of a towel to free them from all extra material as much
as possible, place them in a watch glass so as not to touch each
other, with a little water, in a saucer or small dish filled with small
shot to keep the saucer upright and, covering them with a glass shade,
transfer the whole to a window bench opposite to the light. In a few
days the young Spongilla may be observed (from its white color) is-
suing from the statoblast and gluing the latter as well as itself to the
watch glass, when it will be ready for transfer to the field of the micro-
scope for examination, care being taken that it is never uncovered by
the water, which may be replenished as often as necessary; but of
course the object—-glass (when ¢ inch with high occular is used for
viewing the minute structure) must admit of being dipped into the
water without suffusion of the lens.”
My own first experience in the propagation of fresh water sponges
may prove iastructive in various ways. Late in the autumn of the
year 1879, in a pond within the “Centennial Grounds,” Philadel-
phia, I found for the first time a living sponge. It was a vigorous,
branching specimen of Spongilla lacustris, charged with gemmules
in all parts of its structure. A fragment firmly attached to a stone
was taken home and placed in a gallon “specie-jar” with water, in
the hope, begotten of inexperience, that it would continue to grow,
exhibit its inflowing and exhalent currents, etc. On the contrary,
and as I now know, almost necessarily, it died, and in a few days
the water became insupportably foul. It was changed and another
trial made, which resulted as before. This time the jar was thorough-
ly cleansed; the stone with the attached sponge was taken out and
held long under a flowing hydrant before it was replaced in the jar,
which was now left in an outer shed and, very naturally, forgotten.
Weeks passed and winter came on, and one severe night the water
in my jar was frozen solid and the vessel fractured. I supposed
166 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
that the low temperature to which it had been subjected would
prove fatal to the germs, but, as the specimen was a fine one, it
seemed well to save it, even in its skeletonized condition. So, when
its icy envelope had been melted off, the sponge was again thorough-
ly washed until all the sarcode was removed, when, in a fresh jar,
it again became a parlor specimen. ,
I do not clearly remember when signs of germination were first ob-
served. It was probably in January, as during that month I find
that artificial conditions very frequently bring about the hatching
of such animal germs as those of the polyzoa ete. I detected first
a filmy, grayish-white growth that seemed associated with the de-
tached gemmules which lay in the groove around the bottom of the
jar. but it is a question whether
the type mandible does not belong to a genus near Stylodon. Form.
i4elpm4m8. (5) Leptocladus, is widely separate from Stylodon.*
Its molars, with single recurved cusps and elevated heels are wholly
unique. The post-canine formula was probably pm 4m 6. (6)
Peramus is also widely separated from other genera in its dental
formula, pm 6 m 3; all other polyprotodont genera of this period
having four or more molars. The teeth in the type of this genus
are seen upon the outer surface only. . It is probable that when the
mner surface is known, the formula will be modified to pm 4 m 5.
(7) In the genus Spalacotherium the molars and premolars are well
differentiated; the formula isi? 2,c1, pm 4,m6. (8) Peralestes
probably has a closely related form in Peraspalaa, in fact the generic
distinctness of the latter is doubtful. The post-canine formule are,
Peralestes pn 5 m 6; Peraspalaz, pm 4,m7. (9) The maxilla
which was referred to the genus Stylodon by Professor Owen, must be
removed to a distinct genus, Athrodon, characterized by the compact
position and peculiar wearing pattern of the crowns. (10) The
maxillary formula of Bolodon is found to bei? 2, c¢ 0, pm 3, m 4.
The characters of these teeth are clearly shown in the accompanying
cut.
Leaving out of view for the present, all consideration of rela-
tionships to recent forms, we find that the Mesozoic Mammalia di-
vide into two largér groups. In the first group (1) one of the incisors
is greatly developed at the expense of the others and of the canine;
there is a diastema varying in width in front of the first premolar
and the true molars are invariably characterized by two or more
antero-posterior rows of tubercles separated by longitudinal valleys
or grooves. For this group we may adopt the sub-order Multituber-
culata, proposed by Professor Cope.°
The second group (II) does not show such close internal rela-
tionship among its members as does the foregoing, but is well separ-
ated from it by such characters as the following:
The incisors are numerous and subequal in size, the canines are
3. Professor Owen separated this genus doubtfully from Peralestes.
4, Professor Owen placed it doubtfully near this genus.
5. American Naturalist, 1884, p. 687.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 285
large; there is usually no diastema, the premolar-molar series are
usually in excess of the typical number and the molars are cusped
rather than tubercular. If we were sure of the marsupial relation-
ship of the members of this group we might place them with the
sub-order Polyprotodonta, but some of the included families belong
near the Insectivora.
LT. Multituberculata.
(1) Plagiaulacide. This is probably the oldest family of this
group and is well characterized by the laterally compressed trenchant
premolars. The molars of Microlestes antiquus of Plieninger are
essentially similar to those of Plagiaulax. The M. Moorei molars
cannot be distinguished generically from those of Plagiaulax~’
The least specialized Plagiaulax is Ctenacodon, Marsh.' The modi-
fications in this family are well known as witnessed in the series
Plagiaulax, Ptilodus, Neoplagiaulax.
Loe
Vi ZZ
WI YF
Fig. 1. Right Maxilla of Bolodon.
(2) Bolodontide. This family includes Bolodon and Allodon
Marsh.? The premolars are not trenchant. The molars have two
straight rows of conical tubercles separated by a longitudinal valley.
Although allied to the Plagiaulacide we cannot place these genera
in this family because the molar pattern is essentially different.
6. The molars of AZ. Antiguus, M7. Mooret and P. Minor in each case show a
closely similar disposition of the tubercles.
1. Am. Journ. Sc. and Arts, Nov. 1879, p. 238.
2. This genus is very close to Bolodon in all the details of tooth structure,
but shows the alveolus of a small median incisor which may be wanting in
Bolodon. Allodon has been placed in the Plagiaulacidae by Professor Marsh,
Am. Journ. Sc. and Arts, April 1887, p. 329.
286 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
Bolodon has conical tubercular instead of trenchant premolars. In
Plagiaulax the tubercles are irregular crenations of the border of the
basin shaped crown. In Bolodon they are minute, sharply defined
cones arranged in straight rows with a deeply worn groove between
them; this pattern is like that of Tritylodon with two rows of milan o>
eee of three.
The general likeness between Bolodon and Tritylodon is very
striking in spite of the great discrepancy in size. The latter genus
is perhaps synonymous with Trig/yphus‘ (raas) and forms the type
of the family (3) Tritylodontidae’ (Cope), characterized by the ab-
sence of trenchant premolars and the presence of upper molars with
three parallel rows of tubercles separated by grooves. The Poly
mastodontidce (Cope) forms a fourth, more recent family’.
The position of Stereognathus, Chirox and Meniscoéssus is un-
certain, although they probably belong to this Sub-Order. Ments-
cessus stands nearest the Plagiaulacidae, and Chirox intermediate
between the Bolodontidae and Tritylodontidae.
LT, Second Group.
1. JURASSIC MAMMALS.
Among the second group of mammals I find that the molar
pattern forms an advantageous starting point for classification.
Contrary to the usual statement, the premolars are invariably unlike |
the molars’, but the whole dental series, as well as the mandible,
are in a marked degree correlative in structure and in most instances
distinctly specialized for certain kinds of diet. Some of the molar
patterns with the correlated structures, prevail in a number of genera
which we may group in a family, without knowing exactly where to
place it in the zodlogical scale. The molars of other genera are
transitional in structure between two distinct types. Other genera
again are entirely isolated in their molar structure where no allied
forms have been discovered. This classification by families is, of
course, a temporary one, subject to change as the genera become.
more fully known. The Stylodontidae form the only fully defined
family. —
See Neumayr. Neues Jahrbuch fiir Min. u. Pal. 1884, p. 279.
Am. Naturalist, 1884.
Phascolotherium forms an apparent but not real exception, since the pre-
molars have probably disappeared. In Dzplocynodon, (Marsh, loc. cit. Plate x),
the premolars when viewed upon the inner surface are very distinct from the
dan
bo
molars.
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 287
The chief molar types which characterize families are as
follows:
A. Without opposition of cusps. (1) With three stout, erect
cusps in line. (2) Transitional. With three cusps not in line, two
being rotated inwards. (3) With three slender, divergent cusps
in line. B. With completely opposed cusps, separated by a longitud-
inal valley. (4) C. With completely opposed cusps connected by
transverse ridges. ° (5) Molars with a single styloid cusp on one side
of the crown connected by divergent ridges with a pair of cusps
on the other side. D. Without cusps. (6) The crowns columnar, with
a smooth wearing surface.
By a careful study of the dentition and mandibular structure, we
find that these families unite in small groups which are in early
stages of differentiation along certain lines of functional adaptation.
These lines are not sharply defined, but by a comparison of the
typical forms with the most nearly allied genera of known adaptation
I find we may divide these sub-groups into carnivorous, omnivorous
insectivorous and herbivorous series; employing these terms in a broad
sense as indicating an initial rather than an advanced specialization
of structure,
CaRNIvOROUS SuB-GROUP.
There are many points of resemblance between the following three
families, although at first sight they differ widely. ‘They mostly
embrace the largest genera and the teeth are generally adapted to a
carnivorous diet, especially in the first and second families; in the
third there is an apparent divergence towards another type of dentition
and function. The molars have a strong internal cingulum. The
premolars have basal cusps. The condyle is low and the coronoid
broad.
A. (1) Triconodontide.’ The typical genus of this family is
Triconodon (syn. Triacanthodon, Owen; Priacodon, Marsh.) The
dentition is now fully known. There is nodiastema. The premolars
have strong basal cusps. The canines and the incisors are erect and
powerful. The mandible is strong and the condyle is below the
molar level. These characters and the likeness to Thylacinus show
that this was a carnivorous animal. An older and much less
specialized but probably allied form was Amphilestes. Amphitylus
appears to be related by the character of its molars, but separated
by its mandibular characters, as the condyle is high and pedunculate.
ate Proposed by Professor Marsh.
288 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF - (1887.
Amphitherium, on the other hand is allied by the structure of the
Fig. 2. Portion of the right mandible of Amphitherium.
mandible and separated by the pattern of the molars, which lack the
third cusp. The last two genera are somewhat isolated.
(1a) An allied family is the Phascolotheridae’ embracing Phas-
colotherium and Tinodon, in which there is a diastema behind the
canine; true premolars are few or wanting’, and the mandibular
angle is represented merely by the inflection of the lower border.
The molars are like those of the Triconodontidae except that the
anterior and posterior cusps are smaller and are slightly rotated in-
wards.
(2) Spalacotheridac'. This family embraces Spalacotherium
and Menacodon. The mandible is without a distinct angle, like that
in Phascolotherium, but shallower and with a more elevated condyle.
There is no diastema. The incisors and canines are somewhat similar
to those of Triconodon. The premolars have strong anterior and
posterior basal cusps. The anterior and posterior cusps of the
molars are strongly rotated inwards.
OMNIVOROUS SUB-GROUP.
B. The families embraced in this division are quite closely
inter-related both as regards their dentition and diet. The
genera vary from middle to large size. The typical forms (Perales-
tidae) were probably omnivorous. The incisors are not known, the
canines are large and erect, the premolars have prominent basal
cusps. Instead of an internal cingulum, the lower molars have a
more or less prominent internal row of low cusps. The condyle is
usually on or below the molar level.
2. This name is preferable to 77odontidae recently proposed by Professor
Marsh, since Prof. Owen’s genus is much the best known. It is quite probable
that the Phascolotheridae will be subsequently united with the 7Z?zconodontidae,
linked by intermediate forms with premolars.
3. The post-canine teeth of Z%zodon have not as yet been fully described.
1. This family name was proposed by Professor Marsh, loc. cit. p. 840.
1887. } NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 289
‘The (4) Peralestidae embrace Peralestes and Peraspalax which
are closely related if not synonymous. The lower premolars have dis-
tinct basal cups. The inner and outer molar cusps, instead of
being united by a ridge as in the last, are separated by a longitud-
inal valley. The upper molars (Peralestes) have a lofty internal
ard several low external cusps, while the lower molars, (Peraspalax)
have a high external and low internal cusps. The canines are strong.
~The lower molars are somewhat simpler but resemble those of
Dasyurus and Didelphys. I infer that, like these modern marsu-
pials, these animals were omnivorous.
The lower molars of the highly specialized genus Paurodon, the
type of the Paurodontidae (Marsh), although fewer in number, are
quite similar to those of Peraspalax and suggest an affiliation of
these two families.
The Diplocynodontidae (Marsh) embrace Diplocynodon, Docodon,
and Enneodon. The molars are transitional, illustrating the exten-
sion of the internal cingulum into a broad shelf leading towards a
complete opposition of cusps such as we observe in Peraspalax, but
it is as yet uncertain whether this family is affiliated to the
Peralestidae. This family probably embraces Professor Owen’s
genus Peramus, in which the molar and mandibular structure is
similar to that of Diplocynodon.
InsEecTIvoRous SuB—GROUP.
The two following families differ widely from those preceding. The
genera vary from an extremely small to middle size. The teeth
are adapted to an insectivorous diet, the incisors in the most typical
forms being procumbent and spatulate, the canines small, the pre-
molars lack distinct basal cusps, the last is lofty and pointed. The
molars have no cingulum. The condyle is high and the coronoid
slender. The formula is usually pm 4m8. The families are sep-
arated by the structure of the molars.”
(8) Amblotheridae. This embraces the genera Achyrodon and
Amblotherium. The mandible is very slender and tapers to the
symphysis, with a high condyle. The incisors are semi-procum-
bent and spatulate, the canines small, the last premolars very lofty
°2. Amblotherium and Achyrodon are represented by mandibles seen upon
the inner surface only. In the matrix impressions there is no evidence of outer
cusps, but the teeth closely resemble those of the S¢y/odontidae as seen upon the
inner surface, and these families may prove to be the same.
290 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
and without basal cusps, while the molars have no internal cingula
and no opposition of cusps.
C. (5) Stylodontidae’. Thanks to the discoveries of Professor
Marsh, this family is now very fully represented and the molar
structure is well understood. It embraces Stylodon (Stylacodon)’,
Aesthenodon, Laodon and Dryolestes which is very similar to the
genus Phascolestes (Owen.) ‘There is little doubt therefore that the
latter genus belongs here rather than near Peralestes. The resem-
blance of Stylodon to Chrysochloris, observed by Professor Owen, is
very much strengthened by this extended knowledge of the Stylodon
molars, and indicates that this family was insectivorous. The
structure of the mandible is very similar to that of Amblotherium.
HeERBIvoRovus SuB-GROvP.
D. The single family embraced in this division is widely separated
from all which precede it. The structure of the molars indicates
an herbivorous diet similar to that of the Rodents and the Wombats.
(6) Athrodontidae. Athrodon* is unique in its dentition among
the Mesozoic mammals. The tall trihedral crowns are closely ap-
plied at their sides, thus falling into a curve. The inner face is
styloid, while the outer is grooved and the triangular wearing
surface is traversed by a faint median ridge, thus resembling one
half the crown of a Phascolomys molar. The last premolar is trans-
forming into a molar, the others are small. The canine is large
and bifanged.
The genus Leptocladus is isolated.
Fig. 3. The inner surface of the left maxilla of Athrodon.
1. This family name was suggested by Professor Marsh in 1880 to embrace
Stylodon and Stylacodon. It is probably equivalent to the Dryolestidae more re-
cently proposed by the same author.
2. These genera appear to be the same.
3. Gen. Nov. Type, maxilla of Stylodon pusillus, Owen.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 291
TRIASSIC MAMMALS.
Dromatherium is widely aberrant, and is the most reptilian in ap-
pearance of all the Mesozoic genera. Professor Marsh has proposed
the family Dromatheridae to embrace this genus, but without defining
it. Uniting it with Microconodon, the family may be characterized
by the imperfect division of the fangs of the molars and the wide
diastema behind the canine. The reptilian (Theromorph) condi-
tion of the molar fangs may be found to separate these genera still
more widely from the jurassic forms so as to represent a new order of
mammals, the Protodonta.
CONCLUSION.
It is now generally admitted that many of the genera embraced
in the Multituberculata were Marsupials, and on many grounds it
is safe to place this group as a Sub-Order of the Marsupialia.
Are the Jurassic members of the second group also to be placed in this
order or do they form a distinct order by themselves? Professor
Marsh in his recent view of the Mesozoic mammals has held the
latter view. It is, however, impossible to find a single common char-
acter or set of characters for these genera which is of ordinal value.
On the other hand, there are many grounds for placing the Tri-
conodontidae, Peralestidae and Athrodontidae, and their affiliated
families, in or near the ancestral lines of the modern Dasyuridae
and Phascolomidae respectively, while the Stylodontidae are similarly
related to the Chrysochloridae. These grounds may be partially
stated. What holds good of one genus is naturally true of all the
genera which are clearly allied to it. (1) Triconodon has one
more premolar but otherwise resembles Thylacinus both in the
structure of the mandible and in the form and guccession of the
teeth. (2) Peraspalax, although much more imperfectly known, is
allied to Dasyurus in its molar structure. (3) Athrodon, although
differing from Phascolomys in the possession of a large canine, shows
a marked resemblance to this genus in the molar structure. We
may designate the allied carnivorous, omnivorous and herbivorous
sub-groups as proto-Marsupialia, a sub-order distinguished by the
almost invariable presence of four premolars, a number unknown
among modern Marsupials.
1. The mylohyoid groove is universally present, but is also found in
Myrmecobius.
292 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
In the Amblotheridae and Stylodontidae we probably have a
line of Insectivora. (4) Dryolestes has a molar pattern which is
not observed in any marsupial, but is seen in Chrysochloris among the
Insectivora. Since, however, it is common for marsupials to mimic
the dentition of other orders, this relationship must be held with
.some reserve.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 293
JuLY 12.
Mr. Coaries Morris, in the chair.
Nine persons present.
JULY, 19)
Mr. THomas MEFHAN, Vice-President, in the chair.
Nine persons present.
Auausr 2.
Mr. Coarues Morris, in the chair.
Eight persons present.
Avaust 9.
Dr. W.S. W. RuscHENBERGER, in the chair.
Eleven persons present.
The Publication Committee reported in favor of publishing a
paper entitled “On the Structure and Classification of Mesozoic
Mammalia,” by Henry F. Osborn, in the Journal of the Academy.
On an Aquatie Larva and its Case:—The following from Miss
Adele M. Fielde, dated Swatow, China, April 25, 1887 was read :—
During last January, I found on the level surface of the coarse
sand which covers the bottom of an aqueduct near here, under an
inch or two of clear running water, little structures resembling a
gray net spread to catch fish, or a tiny cave with a gauze awning
stretched over the entrance. The arches had a span of from an
eighth to a half an inch and always opened toward the current.
They were to be seen in scores, with a buttress of coarse sand in
the rear, and a minute aperture in the floor. The force of the
stream had in a few cases swept away the buttress leaving the arch
of gauze, with gray filaments, streaming from its torn hinder edge.
The occupant of the wee grotto was in every case a caterpillar, not
more than five-eighths of an inch long. It burrowed in the sand of
of the floor, stretched its head forth vertically, and fed upon what
had been caught in the delicate roof of its den.
Its head, and the three thoracic segments, each of which bore a
a of four jointed legs ending in two hooks, were of a glossy
rown, while the following eight segments were either gray or green,
and the terminal segment translucent white. The terminal segment
294 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
bore two cylindrical prongs, each ending in a tuft of hairs, and
having underneath a brown claw, like those on all the feet. Eight
segments, beginning with the metathoracic, and ending with the
third from the last, bore on the ventral surface two tufts of white
tracheal gills, which issued from the body in a single stem and
then branched irregularly in several finger-shaped processes, in such
fashion as to give the effect of four longitudinal rows of gills along
the ventral side.
This small cave-dweller seems to be near akin to those found by
Miss C. H. Clarke, in Stony Creek, Mass. and described by her in
a “Description of two interesting houses made by caddis-fly larve,”
in the Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History, May
24, 1882. It is also similar to a species of Hydropsyche, previously
described by Dr. Miiller, in Southern Brazil.
From hektograph copies sent to me by Miss Clarke, of drawings
made by Dr. Miiller, [ conclude that some free floating larva houses,
vase-shaped, translucent, less than a quarter of an inch long, and
with four crenulated floats, found by me here at Swatow, are identi-
cal with the Lagenopsyche Spirogyre, found by Dr. Miller in
Southern Brazil. It seems that these minute Hydroptilide, inhabit-
ing different continents, continue to have their cradles precisely
alike.
Aveusr 16.
; Mr. Caarues Morris, in the chair.
Nine persons present.
A paper entitled “On the Homologies and Early History of the
Limbs of Vertebrates,’ By John A. Ryder, was presented for
publication.
Aveusr 23.
Mr. Cuarues Morris, in the chair.
Nine persons present.
The deaths of the following were reported :—
Prof. S. F. Baird, a member, Aug. 19, 1887; Nathaniel Archer
Randolph M.D., a member, Aug. 21, 1887; Ezra Michener M.D.,
a correspondent. June 24, 1887 and H. W. Ravenel, a correspon-
dent, June 17, 1887.
AvucGust 30.
Mr. CHARLES Morris, in the chair.
Fourteen persons present.
Mr. Harold Wingate was elected a member.
The following was ordered to be printed :—
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 295
NOTES ON THE SPECIFIC NAMES OF CERTAIN NORTH
AMERICAN FISHES.
BY CARL H. EIGENMANN.
1. In the Proceedings U. S. Nat. Mus. 1885 p. 72. Dr. Jordan
says. “The yellow Perch must. . stand apparently as Perca lutea.
The name Centropomus luteus Rafinesque, “Précis des Découvertes
Somiologiques, 1814” is apparently prior to that of Bodianus flaves-
eens Mitchill 1815. .
Prof. Mitchill also described this species in his “Report in Part
on the Fishes of New York, p. 18, Jan. 1, 1814, under the name
Morone flavescens.
This name seems to be still earlier than that of Rafinesque and
the species may stand as Perca flavescens (Mitchill.)
2. The name Morone interrupta Gill seems to be preoccupied by
the Perca mitchilli var. interrupta Mitchill,’ (Trans Lit. & Phil. Soe.
New York, i, 415, 1815), which is also a species belonging to the
same genus, Morone. As this species has no synonyms it may
receive the newname of Morone mississippiensis Jordan & Eigenmann
nom. sp. nov.
©
3. In the transactions of the Literary and Philosophical Society
New York, i, pp. 457 and 458, 1815, Mitchill gives an account of
a small herring under the name of “New York Shadine (Clupea
radina,)” The description reads:—
“An elegant species with a small smutty spot behind the gill-
cover, but with neither spots nor stripes on its back or sides. Mouth
wide and toothless. Tongue small.
“Back delicately variegated with green and blue. Lateral line
straight, sides silvery white, considerably above that line, and below
it quite to the belly. The white reflects vividly green, red or other
splendid hues. Head rather elongated. Lower jaw projecting.
“Scales very easily deciduous. Form neat, taper and slender.
Gills rise into the throat on each side of the root of the tongue. Eyes
pale and large. Tail deeply forked. On account of the even
connection of the false ribs the belly is not at all serrated, but quite
smooth. A semitransparent space in front of the eyes from side to
Meas is. (5 16 Vie tea. eG 102”
1That is Morone lineata (Bloch). We are unable to separate generically
Morone from Roccus and the name AZorone has a few lines priority. J. & E.
296 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
Leaving out of consideration the first paragraph, this is a fair
description of Etrumeus teres DeKay. There is no evident spot behind
the gill covers in alcoholic specimens and the mouth has teeth.
There is a narrow dark bar extending on the sides along the posterior
margin of the opercle to its angle. This may be the smutty spot
referred to by Mitchill. The teeth are not evident to the naked
eye in specimens 8 inches long and may easily have been overlooked
by Mitchill.
The specimen described by DeKay under the name of Alosa
sadina is evidently Brevoortia tyrannus and not the species of
Mitchill. DeKay fearing that sadina would get confounded with
sardina took the liberty to substitute notata for the former. DeKay
thinks the description of Mitchill to be insufficient, but the character
“the belly is not at all serrated” separates this species from all
other New York clupeoides.
The species may stand as Etrumeus sadina (Mitchill.)
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 297
SEPTEMBER 6.
Mr. CHArues Morris, in the chair.
Sixteen persons present.
SEPTEMBER 13.
Mr. CHarues Morris, in the chair.
Sixteen persons present.
SEPTEMBER 20.
Mr. Toomas Mrruan, Vice-President, in the chair.
Eighteen persons present.
SEPTEMBER 27.
Mr. Joun H. REDFIELD, in the chair.
Hight persons present.
The death of Joseph Patterson, a member, was announced.
The following was ordered to be printed :—
20
298 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
ON THE HISTOLOGY OF SALPA.
BY DR. CHAS. 8S. DOLLEY.
In connection with a study of budding in Salpa by Prof. W. K.
Brooks, I have undertaken to review the histology of Salpa.
Thirty years ago Prof. R. Leuckart’ in commencing a study of the
same animal made the remark; “Seit fiinfzig Jahren sind diese
Thiere unzaihlige Male von Zoologen und Anatomen beobachtet
worden, and doch ist das Studium derselben immer noch versprech-
end und lohnend ftir den Forscher,” which is still true: and though
it may at first thought seem presumptuous to expect any thing new
from an animal which has been repeatedly investigated during the
last eighty years, it was deemed best to go over the ground accord-
ing to the improved methods of modern histological research. The
work was mostly done in the Biological Laboratory of Johns Hop-
kins University, and completed in the autumn of 1884 in the
Laboratory of the Zoological Institute in Leipzig.
The specimens used, collected by the United States Fish Commis-
sion in'Vineyard Sound, ‘were preserved in alcohol, and in chromic
or picric acids.
The so-called “Tunica externa” or cuticle of Salpa is a secretion
product of the ectodermal cells of the “Tunica interna.” It is a hy-
aline, homogeneous, elastic material, showing at times, especially in
young specimens, a faintly laminated appearance. This lamination
is absent in the adult forms, where it is destitute of any appearance
of structure, the clear field being broken only by minute granules,
and occasional small stellate or spindle-shaped cell-like bodies scat-
tered irregularly through it. These latter are, so far as I have been
able to observe, destitute of nuclei, and have no connection with one
another. They are probably the remains of cells which have wan-
dered from the ectoderm into the newly formed cuticular secretion.
Like the outer mantle of Doliolum and the “Haus” of Appendic-
laria,’ it seems probable that this cuticle is from time to time shed
and renewed. I assume this from having found in my collection
several empty outer mantles, and also numerous specimens in which
1 Rudolf Leuckart :—‘‘Zoologische Untersuchungen.” “ Zur Entwickel-
ungsgeschichte der Tunicaten. Salpen und verwandte.”” Giessen 1854.
2 Basilius Uljanin:—“Fauna und Flora des Golfes von Neapel.’”? Mono-
graphie X. Doliolum. p.14. Herausgegeben von der Zoologischen Station zu
Neapel, 1884.
PROC. ACAD. NAT. SCI. PHILAD. 1887,
aan
\\
TAABPA
wy
in
raeany
mM)
i
nN aaa
i nai is ah In
/
Hs
SBME i i
SS SaSERE ECE ) Jp, AAS
Dx
he
Rare eT
A nf i i)
\N
DO
PL. XIII,
ia
4
ae
:
ich Ca: A
pit
eet
ES
VA
F788
“A
Bas
mre
UG nid i fl iui
ESS x a
ES S
= S
= SS
==. y
\ NS;
]
Yi
*
oe
Y ON SALPA,
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 299
the outer mantle was unusually thin and soft as if newly formed,
while the exuvis were stiff and elastic.
The “Inner Mantle” presents an ectodermal and an entodermal
cellular layer, which are separated by a hyaline connective basis
substance, of varying thickness, in which lie buried the viscera and
the muscular bands, and through which a net-work of blood sinuses
burrow in all directions.
The ectoderm consists of a single layer, of pavement epithelium,
made up of polygonal, usually hexagonal cells (Plate xiii, figs. 1, 2),
in which the protoplasm with its oval, often slightly bowed nucleus
occupies the central portion; the remainder of the cell appearing
empty and transparent, and the boundaries between neighboring cells
being very poorly defined. These cells lie directly upon the basis
substance of the inner mantle, and are on their outer surface in
contact with the cuticle or outer mantle.
I have nowhere in the ectoderm of Salpa been able to find such
large pavement cells, containing a protoplasmic reticulum extending
out from a centre plasma-mass as Uljanin’ and Grobben’ described
in the larvee of Doliolum; but in several young specimens I find a
layer of epithelial cells, lining the cavity containing the eleoblast
which present an appearance corresponding in almost every partic-
ular to those described by Uljanin. The plasma of these cells is
mostly collected into a central mass from which go out processes,
anastamosing freely and connecting it with a thin, less granular lay-
er at the periphery. The nuclei are oval in form and sometimes lie
to one side of the central mass. Not having living specimens at
hand, I was unable to ascertain anything in regard to the granular
streaming in the protoplasmic network or the retraction of processes
and the extension of others by the central mass as described by
Uljanin. These cells lining the eleoblastic cavity are several times
larger than the cells of the ectoderm covering the body, but they
are similar in structure, and are probably larger because younger,
since Uljanin found several undergoing fission. At the two openings
of the body, branchial and cloacal, the ectoderm passes over into the
entoderm or layer of cells lining the inner mantle ; these correspond
almost exactly with those of the ectoderm, except that the cells are
usually from one third to one half smaller. They vary both in
expels:
2.C. Grobben :—Doliolum und sein Generationswechsel, Arbeiten des zo
olog. Institutes zu Wien. Bd. IV, 11 ft. 2.
300 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
breadth and thickness in various parts of the body, as do the ecto-
dermal cells. The entodermal cells are raised up into two ciliated
bands upon the lateral walls of the branchial chamber and form a
hoop-like elevation about its anterior end, which being inclined back-
ward as it passes toward the dorsal surface, connects the anterior
ends of the endostyle and the gill.
Between the ectoderm and entoderm is a transparent structure-
less material of the same appearance as that composing the outer
material, but lacking the elasticity of the latter on account of its
being pierced and hollowed out by the numerous blood channels
and sinuses. Lying embedded in this porous matrix are the Mus-
cles; these are composed of from six to twelve broad, flat, striated
muscular fibres arranged in bundles, with their broad surfaces in
contact and their edges presenting towards the interior and exterior
of the body. (figs. 8, 4, 5.) The fibres are made up of several
large muscle cells which have become fused together, each fibre
showing a large number of oval nuclei, clear, bladder-like, with rel-
atively large nucleoli. The fibres have a longitudinally striated
appearance caused by the granular contents being arranged in rows
representing the ultimate fibrille. The transverse striation is not
always to be seen, but there is usually present, especially when the
bundles are viewed on the surface, an irregular transverse marking
of the entire bundle, due to certain portions of the cells taking a
deeper staining. (fig. 5.)
The Gill (“hypopharyngeal band” Huxley) is a cylindrical tube
in the living animal, but in preserved specimens more or less col-
lapsed. Its walls are a continuation of the entoderm, and it is filled
with the same spongy basis material that separates the ectoderm
and entoderm, and like this it is perforated by an irregular series
of blood sinuses; not by “a single grand sinus” as described by
Huxley’ (fig. 6, 7.). The cells constituting the walls of the gill are
in the main, identical with those of the entoderm and remain unchan-
ged along the upper and lower surfaces of the organ, but on the sides
they become altered into two longitudinal series of ciliated ribs
(c b, fig. 6.). These form cushion-like elevations, and are made up
of three layers of spindle-shaped cells, the outer layer of which bear
rather long stiff cilia.
The cilia-bearing cells are arranged in regular rows upon the cush-
1 Huxley, (F. H.):—On the Anatomy of Sa/ga and Pyrosoma. Royal
Society Transactions, 1851, p. 570.
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 301
ion, and the number constituting a transverse row in one of the
cushions has been given by Leuckart' as from four to twelve; but
I find a much wider variation than this in the same and in different
individuals (fig. 7.). The number of ciliated ribs or cushions
also varies greatly, running from one hundred to two hundred. At
the anterior end of the gill two of the upper series of cushions are
continued out upon the wall of the branchial sac, and form the semi-
circular ciliated bands, which run obliquely around the anterior
extremity of the endostyle.
The Endostyle of Salpa runcinata-fusiformis (Gig. 8) differs
considerably from that which has been so thoroughly described by
Fol’ in various Tunicates, among others Salpa maxima, S. bicaudata,
S. pinnata, 8. democratica. Running along each side of the endo-
style on the floor of the branchial cavity are the two ciliated bor-
der bands described by Fol (fig. 8, cbb.). In some specimens but
one of these bands appears to be ciliated, causing a lack of symmetry
as was early pointed out by H. Miller and recently by Seeliger. They
consist of twelve or more thick cylindrical cells, bearing numerous cilia.
These bands are separated from the endostyle proper, by a space of
the ordinary pavement epithelium of the branchial sac. The “in-
ner” (Fol) “upper” (Uljanin) glandular cushion is usually in section
made up of thirteen or fourteen large columnar glandular cells poor-
ly defined from one another (fig. 8, ige.). Those lying deepest in
the groove are the longest and thickest, giving the cushion a wedge-
shape, the apex forming the upper edge of the endostyle. The cells
of this cushion have a granular contents and present in the lower
third large bladder-like nuclei with relatively large and striking
nucleoli ; the upper portion of each cell is coarsely granular, and it
is difficult to say where the cell ends and the secreted matter begins.
Usually the two cells lying at the lower end of the cushion show a
longitudinal striation composed of dark bacillus-like spots. Accord-
ing to Seeliger these cells contain the pigment particles, probably
the coarse granules of my preserved specimens, which gives to the
endostyle its blue color. There is no “middle intermediary band”
present in the endostyle of Salpa runcinata-fusiformis, the “inner
glandular cushion” resting directly upon the “middle glandular
cushion” (ige. and mge. fig. 8.). This is also the case with the
Tk Gy jak ata
* Fol. (Hermann) :—Ueber die Schleimdruse oder den Endostyl der Tun-
icaten. Morphologisches Jahrbuch. Vol. 1. 1876.
302 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [ 1887.
specimens described and figured by Seeliger. The middle glandular
cushion consists of eleven long pear-shaped cells, arranged with their
large ends towards without, giving a section of the cushion a kid-
ney-shape. The contents of these cells have none of the coarsely
granular look of those of the “inner” glandular cushion, but present
a faint longitudinal striation; they bear very clear round nuclei in
their basal portions, in the centre of which are prominent round nu-
cleoli. Below the “middle” glandular cushion is the so-called “out-
er intermediary band,” (fig. 8, oib.) but this is again different from
any described by Fol. Instead of consisting of simple pavement cells
it is here made up of three layers of spindle-shaped cells with long
rod-like nuclei; the inner layer’ of cells bearing fine short cilia.
The “outer intermediary band” as figured by Seeliger, differs from
those of Fol and myself in being composed of non-ciliated columnar
cells. The “outer glandular cushion” (oge. fig. 8) is composed of
eleven cells very like those of the “middle” glandular cushion, and
arranged after the same manner, pear-shaped with large ends to-
wards without. They present however several nucleoli in each nu-
cleus instead of but one. The two halves of this cushion forming
together the floor of the endostyle present their largest curves in an
exactly opposite manner to that figured by Fol, but similar to that
of Seeliger. The basal portions of the largest cells of the two halves
lie together in place of being turned away from one another. In
none of my specimens have I been able to find the exceedingly long
cilia, nor the two small oval cells described by Fol as bearing them,
and as lying between the right and left halves of the “outer gland-
ular cushion.”
The Alimentary canal begins with a trumpet-shaped pharynx (ph.
fig. 9,) the everted edges of which pass over into the entodermal
lining of the inner mantel. Its cells are rather long, cylindrical and
hyaline, with small clear nuclei in the basal portions; they bear
coarse lancet-shaped cilia. The character of the cells remain. the
same throughout the esophagus, (oe fig. 9) which is considerably
contracted in diameter; but upon reaching that portion of the canal
which corresponds to the stomach of Doliolum, although there is
no special dilatation of the canal, they lose their cilia and assume
a somewhat more cuboidal character appearing at times to be piled
loosely upon one another in several layers. Just here where the
ciliated epithelium of the cesophagus changes into that of the stom-
ach, the alimentary canal is joined by two ccecal appendages, one
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 303
on each side lapping over the stomach and intestine (fig. 10 cq.).
The cells and their arrangement in these cceca are of an entirely
different character from those of the cesophagus, stomach or intestine.
A transverse section shows a series of very prominent, coarsely
granular, pyramidal cells, containing in the lower third a round
nucleus and several, usually three, nucleoli. They are separated
from one another by lighter, finely granular spaces, which when
viewed from the surface of the ccecum (fig. 11.) present a retic-
ulated appearance.
Whether this is due to the presence of small polygonal cells sep-
arating and surrounding the large glandular cells, or whether it is
amesh work of threads, formed from the secretion of these cells
and connecting them, as in the livers of some molluscs, I can not
be positive; I can not, however, detect any nuclei in the cell-like
spaces.
Huxley’ described but one ccecal appendage in Salpa, and called
it the stomach, into which, according to his description, opened the
duct from the net-work of anastamosing tubules which ramify over
the visceral nucleus. In the form which I have examined there
are present two ccecal appendages (fig. 10) as single sections plainly
show and as I have learned positively by a model of the visceral
nucleus constructed according to Born’s“Platten-Modillir” method.’
Seeliger in his paper, referred to further on, also mentions and fig-
ures but one cecum. I can only account for the disagreement be-
tween the observations of Huxley and Seeliger on the one hand
and my own on the other, by the supposition that the number of
coeca varies in different species. I shall take advantage of the earl-
lest opportunity, however, to examine the visceral nuclei of all spe-
cies of Salpze.
My observation agrees with those recently made by Seeliger in
confirming H. Miiller’s statement that no food is ever found in these
cecal appendages, but their lumen is often filled with a structure-
less product of secretion. Opening as they do at the anterior end
of the stomach they are evidently of some material use in digestion,
and from the arrangement and structure of their walls I am of the
opinion that they function as hepatic organs, as was first proposed
DLC. p. ov li.
” Archiv. ‘f. mikroscop. Anat, xxii, p. 584, 1883. Amer. Naturalist,
April 1884.
304 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
by H. Miller’ from the peculiar contents of the glandular cells as
observed by him.
As set forth at length in a former communication to this Academy?
I was unable in any of my specimens to find in the csophagus or
stomach of Salpa the large plasmodium described by Koratneff’
I have serial sections from many specimens showing the entire curve
of the alimentary canal from the mouth to the rectum in which the
lumen throughout is perfectly free from any organized protoplasmic
mass. Other preparations show the food laden mucus passing from
the branchial cavity through the pharynx, esophagus and stomach.
Before reaching the stomach, on account of its containing much
protoplasmic material which has not yet been acted upon by the di-
gestive juices, this mixture of food and mucus takes staining very
well; but after reaching the stomach it gradually refuses to stain,
and in the intestine consists of a mass of colorless debris, owing to
the organic materials having been removed by digestion. Sections
cut diagonally across the cesophagus sometimes appear as though
the lumen of the tube was almost obliterated except a narrow slit
on one side, this is not actually the case as sections cut longitudi-
nally (fig. 9.) or at right angles prove.
My observations opposed to the presence of an inter-cellular or
parenchymatous digestion in Salpa, referred to above, have since
been confirmed by Oswald Seeliger* in his interesting and valuable
paper on the budding of Sadpa, in which he refers to this subject as
follows :—“Ich muss demgegentiber nun darauf aufmerksam machen,
dass Korotneff im Magen von Salpa africana Verhaltnisse angetroffen
hat, die darauf schliessen lassen, dass in denselben thatsichlich
Nahrung hineingelangt und daselbst verdaut oder resorbirt wird.
Ich habe leider Koratneff’s Angaben tiber die “freien Magenzellen”
und die “parenchymatése Ernahrung” der Tunikaten nicht an ver-
schiedenen Objekten nachstudiren kénnen, bei Salpa democratica
aber fand ich sie nicht zutreffend. Auch von anderer Seite (Dolley)
1 Heinrich Muller, Ueber die anatomische Verschiedenheit der zwei For-
men bei den Salpen. Ztschr. f. wiss. Zool., Bd. IV. 1853, p. 330.
2 «Some observations opposed to the presence of a parenchymatous or intra-
cellular digestion in Salpa.”? April 15th 1884 vid. Proceedings, Acad. Nat. Sci.
Philadelphia. Zool. Anz. 1884, p. 705. .
8 Dr. A. Koratneff. Ueber der Knospung der Anchinia. in Ztschr. f. wiss.
Zool. Bd. 40. Hft. 1, 1884, Feb. 19.
4 Oswald Seeliger. “Die Knospung der Salpen” Jenaische Zeitschr. fur
Naturwissenschaft,” Bd. 19, page 631.
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 305
hat man Korotneff’s Auffassung nicht zustimmen kénnen, und es
ware in der That eine nochmalige Nachprtifung von dessen Mittheil-
ungen wiinschenswerth, bevor man das eigenthtimliche Verhalten
der Tunikaten beim physiologischen Processe der Ernihrung zu der
Schlussfolgerung—der ich aber aus anderen Griinden volkommen
beipflichte— verwendet “deswegen haben wir in unserem Falle
Ursache, noch an der hohen genetischen Stellung zu zweifeln, die
den Tunikaten zugeschrieben ist.”
At the beginning of the intestine proper the cells composing the
walls resume the appearance of those of the cesophagus and again
cilia show themselves.
The presence of cilia for moving on the intestinal contents is nec-
essary on account of the lack of any musculature in connection with
the visceral nucleus. There is present under all the cells of this
tract a delicate basement membrane in which nuclei may occasion-
ally be seen. Spreading over the visceral nucleus is a net-work of
delicate tubes; the “darmumspinnende Driise” of Seeliger and
others.
These consist of an extremely thin basement membrane bearing
cuboidal cells of a pale transparent character in which there was no
nucleus visible. In no place could I detect cilia in these tubules as
described by Chandeleon' for Perophora, but I did find numerous
large concretion-like masses of a dark-brown color. Seeliger believ-
ing these glandular tubules to be hepatic in function might perhaps
consider the above dark-brown masses as biliary secretion.
The disadvantage of having no living specimens to examine is ap-
parent when I say I can not find the plasma offshoots from the
stomach cells into the lumen of the same, nor the glandular cells,
containing yellow drops, seen by Seeliger in the stomach walls of
living specimens.
Filling up the cavity produced by the doubling of the intestine,
and by the two ceecal appendages, lie the Testes which consists of a
number of delicate tubes in which a basement membrane is scarcely
apparent; and a layer of clear round cells containing pear-shaped
nuclei, form the walls. I could not find the “spindle-shaped nu-
cleated cells forming a sort of connective tissue about the gland as
described by Leuckart.’
The Heart lies in a pericardium which appears to be but a sac
1 Th. Chandeleon :—Recherches sur une annexer du tube digestif des Tu-
niciers in Buil de l’Acad. Roy. de Belgique. 44me Année. 2e Ser. T. XX XIX, p.
911, 1875.
Ja ECup ies
306 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [ 1887.
formed from the entodermal layer of the inner mantle, the cells of
both being similar in every respect. The heart itself is composed
of a structureless basement membrane supporting a layer of striated
fusiform muscle cells. These “fibre cells” lie upon their flat sides,
with their long axes at right angles with the long axis of the heart.
They have a single oval nucleus and present a delicate transverse
striation (fig. 12.). They are much smaller than the fibres of
the trunk muscles.
The Eleoblast (statoblast of Vogt.) situated on the central side of
the body near the cloacal opening consists in hardened specimens
of a mass of large irregularly polygonal bodies, showing no nuclei
and varying greatly in size. They are opaque and have a coarsely
granular appearance as if filled with a sort of yolk material. They
are undoubtedly cells which have been greatly engorged and modified.
In sections they usually drop out to a large extent owing to the re-
moval of the oil and fat by the reagents, leaving a reticulum made
of' the transparent connective material of the inner mantel in a cay-
ity of which, or rather on the outer side of which, the elzeoblast Lies ;
the entire mass being covered with the peculiar large plaster cells
previously described.
The function of this body seems still to be undetermined. In ad-
ult specimens it disappears entirely, but is present both in solitary
and chain Sa/pe when young. Vogt held it to be homologous with
the placenta, Salensky’ considers that in those Salp@ developed from
the ege it arises from the same elements out of which the blood cor-
puscles and muscles are formed (“amoeboid follicular cells”); in the
chain Salpe it is developed from the mesoderm.
The Nerve Ganglion or brain presents a nearly spherical mass
covered with a delicate membrane which seems continuous with the
outer sheath of the nerve trunks. Upon section it shows an outer
layer of apolar ganglion cells, only the nuclei of which are to be
seen as a rule, and a central portion of lighter colored fibrillar
(“punct”) substance (fig. 15, NG).
Resting upon the brain and in fact a continuation both of the cen-
tral fibrillar core and the external layer of ganglion cells, is the
Visual Organ of Salpa, (regarded by Huxley as an auditory organ.)
Outside of its nervous central portion (fig. 18 vo) is a layer of rather
large cylinder cells (fig. 13 pe.) containing in their inner halves a
1 Salensky (W.):—‘“Uber die Entwickelungsgeschichte der Salpen’’’ in
Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zool. XX VII 1877. Morphol. Jahrb. III p. 591.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 307
round nucleus and a quantity of dark pigment ; the upper and outer
halves being clear and transparent. In no case did I find the nuclei
in the clear outer portion, as figured by Seeliger (1. ¢. pl. xi, fig. 15).
These pigment cells are in their turn covered with a layer of colum-
nar cells, each of which contains a nucleusin its outer end. This
layer does not seem continuous with the entodermal layer covering
the brain, and is probably a modified portion of the ectodermal layer
of the inner mantel. In one or two specimens which I had prepared
without ascertaining their specific name, I found the eye to be much
more flattened than in the figure given here, and divided up into
several lobes.
From the above description, Sa/pa would seem to possess a sort of
compound eye. Passing out from the central fibrillar portion of
the brain, are several nerve trunks; from eleven to twenty-five
pairs, which show a clear envelope with a dark granular axis. No
fibrils are to be seen. The brain is covered by the entoderm which
is, however, not in direct contact with it at all points.
Below and anterior to the brain the entoderm of the median dorsal
surface is invaginated to form the Ciliated Sac, (Vhypophyse.) This
structure as seen in other Tunicates has given rise to much discussion
in regard to its function. Ussow' and Julin’ regard this as a gland,
Joliet’ considers it to be olfactory in character. In Salpa it consists
of a simple tube (fig. 18, ? Hy.) closed at the end next the ganglion
against which it rests, and opening at the other end into the branch-
ial sav. Its walls are made up of short thick columnar cells carry-
ing heavy cilia. It, however, possesses no such peculiarities as the
glandular cceca described in Ascidia mammillata.
LETTERING OF FicurEs, Pl. XIII.
(6s) blood sinus.
(Br or br) branchia.
(cb) ciliated cushion (in gill).
(ebb) ciliated border band.
(ct) cuticle.
(coe) cecal appendages.
1 Ussow :—‘‘Beitrage zur Kenntniss der Organization des Tunicaten.”’
Moscow, 1876.
2 Julin (Chas.):—l’Hypophyse des Ascidiens in Bull. Acad Sc. de Bel-
migne, 3d, Ser. T, 1. P.2, p. 151:
3 Joliet. M. L. :—**Sur le developpement du ganglion et du “sac cilie’”’ dan
le burgeon du Pyrosome’’ Compte. rend., Ac. Sci. Paris. T. 94, No. 14, p. 988.
308
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
(ec) ectoderm.
(en) entoderm.
(Hm) heart muscle.
(ige) inner glandular cushion.
(im) inner mantle.
(int) intestine.
(0 Hy) Vhypophyse.
(m. 6.) muscular bands.
(mf) muscles fibres.
(mge) middle glandular cushion.
(mib) middle intermediary band.
(nf) nerve fibre.
(ng) nerve ganglion.
(oe) cesophagus.
(ogc) outer glandular cushion.
(ovb) outer intermediary band.
(pe) pigment cells.
(ph) pharynx.
(vo) visual organ.
Fig.
ae
on
EXPLANATION OF Figures, Pl. XIII.
Section of inner and outer mantles.
Surface view of ectoderm.
Portions of three muscle fibres from muscular bundle.
Section through one of the muscular bundles of the trunk
showing its position in the inner mantle.
Seven muscle fibres as seen from a surface view of one of
the bundles.
Transverse section of the entire gill.
Longitudinal section through a portion of the gill, on the
plane of cb. in fig. 6.
Showing one half of a transverse section of the endostyle
Longitudinal section through the cesophagus.
Transverse section of the intestine and the two ceecal ap-
pendages. :
View of the outer surface of a ccecal appendage.
Striated muscular “fibre cells” composing the wall of the
heart.
Vertical section through brain, visual organ, and V’hy-
pophyse.
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 309
OcTroBER 4.
The President, Dr. JosrpuH Lerpy, in the chair.
Seventeen persons present,
A paper entitled “The Classification of the Post-Cretaceous
Deposits.” By Angelo Heilprin, was presented for publication.
OcToBER 11.
The President, Dr. Jos. Lrerpy, in the chair.
Twenty-two persons present.
A paper entitled “Prolonged Life of Invertebrates. Notes on
the Age and Habits of the American Tarantula.” By Henry C.
McCook, D. D. was presented for publication.
At the meeting of the Botanical Section held September 12th, a
paper entitled “Contributions to the Life-Histories of Plants.” By
Thomas Meehan, was recommended for publication.
Fossil bones from Florida:—Prof. Lrerpy stated that he had
recently received for examination, from the Geological Survey in
Washington, two barrels and three boxes of fossil bones from
Florida. They are labelled as having been collected by L. C. John-
son, from Mixson’s bone-bed, 10 miles east of Archer, Levy Co.,
Florida. A note accompanying the collection, states that trenches
were cut in the bed to the bottom rock from two and a half to six
feet deep, and that the bones were found distributed abundantly
without order, through the clay from top to bottom. The bones es-
pecially the larger ones, are generally much broken, though the
original texture is mostly preserved, and they exhibit no trace of
being rolled or water worn. The fractures appear to be entirely
accidental or with no evidence of human action. Some portions of
clay in large hollows of several specimens exhibit finely commi-
nuted bones. The fossils pertain to the same animals previously in-
dicated from the same locality in former communications (See the
Proceedings, 1884, 118; 1885, 32; 1886, 11, 37.) They consist
chiefly of the remains of Rhinoceros proterus, Mastodon floridanus,
and Auchenia major. Among them are a number of well preserved
molars of the Rhinoceros and Mastodon. Several more character-
istic specimens prove that he had formerly committed a blunder in
referring the fragment of a tooth, to an extinct boar with the name
of Kusyodon maximus (Proc. 1886, 37), which is only part of the
lower tusk of the rhinoceros. A tooth from the same locality,
sent him by Dr. J. C. Neal of Archer, Florida, indicates a species
310 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
of Hippotherium different from H ingenwum (Proce. 1885, 33), and
also seems sufficiently distinct from the corresponding tooth of the
many other species of the genus elsewhere found in America, to ren-
der it probable it pertains to an undescribed species. It is an upper
molar of an animal approximating the Ass in size, and larger than
H. ingenuum. The triturating surface, represented in the accompa-
nying figure, exhibits a complexly folded condition of the enamel,
quite different from that of the latter,(com-
pare figure in Proc. 1885, 33). ‘The spe-
cies may be named Hippotherium plica-
tile. Three lower molar teeth according in
size with the upper one were also received
from Dr. Neal. An astragalus and frag-
ments of several other bones contained in
the former collection accord in size with
the teeth of H. plicatile, while an astrag-
alus received from Dr. Neal accords in-
size with the tooth of H. ingenwum.
Comparative and other measurements are as follows :—
H. plicatile. H. ingenuum.
Upper molar, triturating surface :
Breadth ies SHOTS MATEO § ata oel 20mm 19mm.
Breadth transversely ..... 23 “ ATi
First lower molar:
Breadth fore and aft ..... 25mm
Breadth transversely ..... 14 “
Intermediate lower molar:
Breadth fore and aft ..... 22mm
Breadth transversely ..... 1a
Astragalus :
Breadth fore and aft..... 49mm 35mm
Breadth transversely behind . 40 “ ZO.
OcToBER 18.
Mr. Joun H. RepFre.p, in the chair.
Fath
Nineteen persons present.
OcTroBER 20.
The President, Dr. Jos. Lerpy, in the chair.
Twenty-four persons present.
Preliminary note on a new mineral Species from Franklin, N. J—
Prof. Gro. A. Korntae called attention to his recent examination
of a mineral from the above locality which has not been heretofore
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 311
known. This mineral occurs in pale grayish yellow, stellate masses,
somewhat resembling karpholite or pyrophyllite. It is associated
with calcite. The stellate aggregation is readily friable as it breaks
into minute prismatic particles. Made into an artificial splinter, the
substance fuses in the oxydizing flame to a black glass. Heated in
a closed tube it yields abundant water at a red heat, changing its
color to chocolate brown. The water does not act acid, nor corrode
glass. Carefully dissolved ina borax bead, the latter remains color-
less at first, then gradually assumes the characteristic manganese
color. The powder dissolves in hot concentrated hydrochloric acid
but does not gelatinize. The specific gravity (determined with
1.4230 gram.) is 2.981.
The analysis gave
SiO? = 39:00
MnO = 42°12
EO; — 644
ReOy = (aio
ZEON Oo
MgO = 3°83
100°00
The determination of iron was lost, its quantity is made up by the
difference. Manganese is present as MnO; (the peculiar behavior
in borax mentioned aboye, and the absence of any evolution of chlo-
rine, when dissolved in HCl are proofs of this assertion.) Calcium
is only present in traces and was weighed with the magnesia.
If we calculate the molecular ratio of the oxyds we obtain
one ae HeO A200, MeO) e S102—— Le 2a 0:60) ks
== Beil
Tis i is the ratio of an orthosilicate, and in fact is the Eerie
of Tephroite, in which a considerable portion of manganese is re-
placed by water. That the water must be considered as basic, fol-
lows from the fact that none is expelled at 200° C. The low spe-
cific gravity is very extraordinary and seems to indicate a polymeric
condition of the molecule. The name Bementite is proposed for
this species.
Remarks on Hydra :—Pror. Lreipy remarked that in our fresh
waters there occur two well marked species of hydra, the one of a
bright green color, the other pale brownish or reddish. He contin-
ued, these, judging from descriptions and figures, appear to him to be
the same as the European species H. viridis and H. fusca. The late
Prof. L. Agassiz regarded them as different and named them H.
gracilis and H. carnea (Proc. Bos. Soc. Nat. Hist. 1850, 354.)
Familiar as he was with both the European and American animals
his opinion might be considered conclusive, but the only distinctive
character he assigns to each seems not to be correct. Of our green
hydra he observes that unlike the European it has the power of ex-
tending its body in a remarkable degree. Opposed to this view,
312 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [ 1887.
Résel in 1755, represents H. viridis in the same condition and with
the arms in the same proportionately short state (Insecten Belustig-
ung, Theil 3, Tab. 88, Fig. 4.) In other characters, the speaker
found our green Hydra to accord with H. viridis; and further in
respect to the sexual organs. Prof. Allen Thompson describes the
latter as producing a single ovary near the middle of the body and
two or three spermaries from the body just below the arms (Edin-
burgh Philos. Jour. 1847, 281.) The same condition he had ob-
served in our green hydra, as represented in the drawings exhibited.
As regards our brown hydra, Agassiz gives as the distinctive char-
acter, that it has very short arms while the European has long ones.
Ordinarily this appears to be the case, but on several occasions the
speaker had observed our brown hydra, after it had been kept some
time in an aquarium where there was comparatively little food,
elongate its arms, extremely attenuated, even to a length of three
inches. In this condition it closely resembled in appearance the
beautiful figure of H. fusea in figure 1, plate 64. of the Regne Ani-
mal of Cuvier.
He had the opportunity of seeing both the green and brown hy-
dra west of the Rocky Mts. and these he found to accord in character
with’ our eastern forms. In specimens collected in a lake in the
Uinta Mts., Wyoming T., at 10.000 feet elevation, the brown hy-
dra at first was brick red with a brighter red head, but after keep-
ing it for a week, it assumed the pale brown hue as ordinarily ob-
served in the animal nearer hone.
The characters of the two American forms as observed by him
are as follows :—
Hypra vrrtpts? The green hydra. Animal bright grass green
sometimes paler. Body when moderately elongated cylindro-conical,
tapering towards the caudal end; when contracted oval or spheroid ,
when greatly extended linear cylindrical. Head conical. Arms
four to seven, commonly six, about half the length of the body, lin-
ear, capable of extension to about the length of the body or slightly.
more. In the sexually mature state:—testes hemispherical sur-
mounted by a nipple-shaped prominence, situated on the sides of the
body just below the arms; ovary single, projecting from near the
middle of the body and containing a single, spherical, white egg, en-
closed in a brownish covering. Animal usually three or four lines
long, capable of extension to twice the length or contracting to less
than a line. In ponds and ditches in the vicinity of Philadelphia
and other places, though not common. Observed on one occasion
in the sexually mature condition late in autumn. In the in-
dividuals observed the sexes were separate; the males with the two
testes, and the females with a single ovary. The ovum measured
0°375mm in diameter. In the sexually mature H. viridis observed
by Prof. A. Thompson, individuals were hemaphrodite while in
others the sexes were separate.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 313
Hypra Fusca? The brown hydra. Animal more robust than
the former, of the same shape and nifmber of arms, but with the
body less attenuated when extended and with the arms habitually
longer in proportion to the body, but capable of extension to six
times the length of the latter. Color usually pale brownish or red-
dish ; sometimes deeper, sometimes paler. In ponds and common
on the under side of stones in the Schuylkill and Delaware Rivers,
in the vicinity of Philadelphia. | Not observed in the sexually ma-
ture condition. The color of the animal in a measure appears to
depend on the nature of the food; and it may become a bright red,
of variable tint, by feeding on similar colored entomostraca or in-
sect larvee (See Proc. 1880, 156.) From prolonged abstinence the
color fades and the animal becomes almost white.
Craig D. Ritchie was elected a member.
The following were ordered to be published :—
21
314 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF | [1887.
THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE POST-CRETACEOUS DEPOSITS.*
BY PROF. ANGELO HEILPRIN.
The point of first importance to determine is whether all the
deposits succeeding the Cretaceous period belong to a single major
system, or, as is generally recognized, to two distinct systems, the
Tertiary and Quaternary of geologists. It will probably be con-
ceded by all geologists that the only rational scheme of chronologi-
cal classification is that which can be made to be of universal appli-
cation; in other words, asystem that applies equally to all countries.
In our present knowledge, but one such scheme of broad classifica-
tion is known—that which is based upon the rise and fall of success-
ive faunas. Granting a nearly equivalent development of life-forms
for the greater portion, if not the whole, of the earth’s surface—a
condition which can now be satisfactorily demonstrated, or at least
demonstrated to a variation within narrow limits—it will be mani-
fest that we have in this development a true guage of chronological
relationship, and one that must be fairly exact in its application. The
grouping of systems will then be a mere deduction from the time—
record made to correspond to certain well-defined or rounded-off pe-
riods, so to speak, of faunal development, whose existence is made
known to us through the dissimilarities of successive faunas. |
How much, or what amount of, dissimilarity is considered sufti-
cient to mark out distinct systems is a matter of little consequence
to the geologist, but where uniformity of classification is required,
naturally only equivalent terms, or terms of approximately equal
value, should be used. The greater number of the major geological
systems now recognized are delimited by faunal dissimilitudes of a
more or less definite measure, which is indicated in the ratio of trans-
gressional forms uniting to the system below and to that above.
The present classification admits in a general way for each system
a faunal peculiarity measured in its lowest terms by some 35 or 40
per cent, and this classification has fairly met the demands of geol-
ogists in its application to almost all the entire series of sedimentary
rock deposits. Remarkably enough, in the case of the post-Cretaceous
deposits, whose classification has been effected probably by greater
niceties of percentage divisions than that of any other series, this meas-
* Amplification of a report prepared, by request, for the American Com-
mittee of the International Congress of Geologists.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 315
ure has been only loosely, or not at all, adhered to. What, it might
be asked, are the claims of the Post-Pliocene and recent formations
to being considered a distinct system? Viewed in its faunal as-
pects, the question may be very readily disposed of: the formations
in question have no claim to such recognition. If the formations
from the Eocene to the Pliocene inclusive are justly considered to
constitute, by virtue of their faunal unity, a distinct system, the
Tertiary, then manifestly the post-Tertiary (Post-Pliocene to recent)
must be a part of the same system, since its faunal ties unite it infin-
itely more closely with the more recent members of the Tertiary than
the individual members of the latter are united among themselves.
Thus the Eocene or Oligocene is further removed faunally from the
Miocene than the Pleistocene is from the Pliocene; and the same rela-
tion holds with the Miocene and Pliocene. Lyell, himself the framer
of the now very generally accepted classification ofthe post-Cretaceous
deposits, admits that in the so-called Newer Pliocene deposits of
Sicily the percentage of recent molluscan forms rises as high as 90,
or even higher, consequently reducing the faunal peculiarity to less
than 10 per cent. In the Chillesford beds of Suffolk, England, the
faunal peculiarity is reduced to about 15 per cent, and in the Nor-
wich or Fluvio-Marine Crag to 16 per cent. Again, the uppermost
of the Subapennine deposits of Northern Italy, forming part of the
“Astian” series (Pliocene proper of Capellini), have been shown by
Foresti to hold about 80 per cent of living forms, reducing, therefore,
the faunal peculiarity, in its lowest expression, to 20 per cent.. On
the other hand, the deposits immediately underlying these, forming
still a part of the true Pliocene series—Foresti’s horizon I1I—hold
barely more than 43 per cent of living forms, and are thus strongly
individualized by their faunal peculiarity, in so far, at least, as a
relationship with the overlying deposits is concerned, although
the ties with the deposits underlying (Mio—Pliocene of Capellini—
Messinian of Mayer) are much more intimate. Horizon II of For-
esti is characterized by some 59 per cent of living forms, and I by
nearly 51 per cent; both of these divisions are by many Italian
geologists classed with the Miocene, which really appears to be their
true position, contrary stratigraphical evidence notwithstanding.
Seeing how very closely the Pliocene fauna in its highest expres-
sion approximates the fauna of the present day (et conseq. the Post-
Pliocene fauna), and the broad latitude of peculiarity allowed it by
most geologists, it becomes interesting to inquire in how far similar
316 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF | [1887.
conditions of relationship or divergence obtain among the older Terti-
ary deposits. It is well known to geologists that in most regions where
Tertiary deposits are developed, the faunal relationship existing
between the Eocene and Miocene series is a very restricted one; in-
deed, in some regions it would appear that there is scarcely a single
species of fossil held in common by the two classes of deposits. This
is very largely the case in France, and perhaps more particularly
in the Eastern United States, where the respective faunas are
practically wholly distinct. It is true that, in some regions, a careful
analysis of the formations now frequently referred to the Olig-
ocene has shown a number of connecting forms, and has brought the
two formations in closer relationship with each other, but the uni-
ting bond, as compared with that which unites the Pliocene with
the Post-Pliocene, or the Tertiary with the post-Tertiary, is still very
weak. In the Oligocene (Vicksburg) deposits of the United States,
for example, it is doubtful if the number of transgressional forms
uniting with the Miocene numbers more than six, and possibly not
that many, out of a total of some 150 species.
These facts being admitted) it can scarcely be argued further that,
with our existing classification as a basis, there remains any valid
reason for separating, as a distinct system, the Post-Pliocene (post-
Tertiary) series from the Tertiary (Pliocene). It may, however, still
be contended that we allow too much latitude to the Pliocene, and
that with a proper restriction to boundaries in which the recent fau-
nal element does not exceed 70 or 75 per cent, instead of rising to
85 and 90, or more, room may be had for a major series with a
largely peculiarized fauna. But even with this limitation the fau-
nal break separating a post-Tertiary series from the upper member
of the Tertiary (Pliocene), would scarcely be as great, and in most
cases not nearly so great, as that separating the Pliocene from the
Miocene, or the Miocene (or Oligocene) from the Eocene. —
Apart from the matter of mere numbers as indicating a lack of
of peculiarity in the post-Tertiary fauna, it may be urged that
there are yet certain elements in it which serve broadly to distin-
guish it from the faunas immediately preceding, and which would
entitle it to the claim of a true system-fauna. Thus, as has fre-
quently been claimed, we have here the first evidences of man, and,
therefore, the expression of a so-called “Psychozoic” era; the remains
of a remarkable series of large edentate animals— Megatherium, Mylo-
don, Megalonyx, G'lyptodon, ete.—foreign to the earlier faunas, yet
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. B17
sufficiently abundant as a distinguishing element in the fauna of la-
ter date; and finally, the elimination of certain faunal features of
the period preceding, which can be passed over without further notice.
As far as the occurrence of the giant Edentata and of certain other
associated animal forms—Toxodon, Macrauchenia—is concerned, it
may be remarked that by many geologists and paleontologists the beds
containing their remains are referred to the Pliocene, and not to the
Post—Pliocene, period ; and we have now the unmistakable evidence
of somewhat similar, or at least related, forms being found in the
Miocene and Pliocene deposits of the Western United States. Nor,
even if we admit that these remarkable forms are exclusively Post—
Pliocene, can it be assumed that they are in themselves sufficient to
distinguish a fauna, the less so as their remains have only been
found in a comparatively limited portion of the earth’s surface, and
have yielded no substitutes elsewhere.
The case of man’s appearance is equally inadmissible as a factor
in the question, since, in the first place, it is now practically certain,
even if positive proof in this direction is still wanting, that he al-
ready existed during the close of the Tertiary period, and not
improbably even at a much earlier date. Furthermore, his ad-
vent, looked at purely from the zoological stand-point, could be
no more a distinguishing feature in a fauna than would be the
advent of Dryopithecus or Hippopotamus. Nothing can be more
illogical than the assumption that because man is of all importance
in the faunal element of to-day, judged from the stand-point of our
own capricious opinions, he is of equal importance when measured
by the purely zoological standard. Equally illogical is the assump-
tion of a Psychozoic age as distinguished from any of the ages pre-
ceding.
Having, as I believe, satisfactorily shown that the Post-Pliocene
series of deposits, which include the “Pleistocene,” “Glacial” and
“Recent” of most geologists, cannot be separated as a distinct system
from the Tertiary, it becomes necessary to find a common name un-
der which all these series of deposits can be included. The term
Kainozoic (Cenozoic) or Tertiary, corresponding to Mesozoic or
Secondary, and Paleozoic or Primary, might be conveniently retained,
and its application so enlarged as to embrace both the Tertiary and
Quaternary in use at present—Quaternary, of necessity, completely
dropping away.
It now remains to determine of what relative values are the major
318 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [ 1887.
divisions of the Kainozoic or Tertiary. It will probably be admit-
ted by most geologists that the divisions pre-Glacial (Pleistocene),
Glacial, and Recent are merely sub-groups of a single major forma-
tion, for which the familiar term Post-Pliocene might be conveniently
retained. “Its value may be accepted as being approximately equiv-
alent to Pliocene, Miocene, Oligocene, or Kocene, although the val-
ues of these last differ somewhat among themselves. Indeed, it is
not a little difficult to determine what precise significance is to be
attached to these divisions of the Tertiary, whether they are of equiv-
alent value with the (generally so considered) corresponding terms
of the Mesozoic—Cretaceous, Jurassic, ete.—-and Paleozoic series—
Carboniferous, Devonian, etc—or not. In most geological tables they
are accorded this value, but it is more than doubtful if they are enti-
tled to it. Probably but few geologists will deny that the Post-Pliocene
and Pliocene are much more intimately related to one another than
are the Devonian and Silurian, the Devonian and Carboniferous, or
the Jurassic and Cretaceous. And a similar intimate relation holds
by comparison between the Eocene and Oligocene. The Post-Plio-
cene and Pliocene, again, appear in most cases to enjoy a much
closer affiliation than exists between the latter and the Miocene, and
similarly, the bond of union uniting the Eocene with the Oligocene
is greater than that which holds the latter to the Miocene. So that
while it may be impossible to attach absolute values to the terms or
periods marked off in Tertiary chronology, it appears to the present
writer more in consonance with existing facts, and as a stricter
parallel to the methods employed in pre-Tertiary terminology, to
group the entire series into three main sections, corresponding to as
many periods of geological time, as follows :
|) NEOGENE | Post-Pliocene.
KAINOZOIC Pliocene.
or ; Mretacenr—Miocene.
TERTIARY { Oligocene.
ens { Eocene.
The classification of the Tertiary deposits, brought en rapport with
the classification of the pre-Tertiary series, and as based upon the
formations of the Atlantic slope of the United States, would then be
as follows:
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 319
a
Recent.
Neogene. Post- Pliocene Glacial.
Pleistocene,
re Pliocene. Floridian.
<
&
6
A
4 i Carolinian
5) Metagene. Miocene. Virginian.
< Marylandian.
8
fe)
4 : SATE
< Oligocene. Orbitoitic (Vicksburg)
2] a
Jacksonian.
Eogene. mcsHe Claibornian.
| > Buhrstone.
Eo-Lignitic.
F " Danian.
Senonian.
Chalk. (European.) Thea
; Cretaceous. ; Cenomanian.
is Gault. Albian.
Ss Neocomian,
a
°
)
a
ite. &c.
P ipo Oolite c
¥ Lias. &c.
ie)
N
°
wn |
a |
=}
Triassic. &e.
|
On the value of the faunal element in geological chronology. Some
geologists, and notably those who profess but little knowledge of
paleontology, have attempted to make light of the evidence which
the zoological record brings to bear upon the classification of rock-
masses. Indeed, even at the present time, in some of our surveys
only a left-handed assistance is asked by the geologist-in-charge
from the paleontologist, with the result known to all who are capa-
ble of distinguishing between work that is done and that which still
requires to be done. It is true that in many tracts, and in tracts
even of wide area, the relative sequence of rock formations can fre-
quently be traced without the aid of paleontology, and a map, more
or less perfect, constructed on the details thus brought together.
But soooner or later, if the comparative study of a region is neces-
sitated, reference must be had to the fossil remains, which alone serve
320 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
to the geologist the data of an infallible chronology. The absolute
succession of equivalent faunas, or faunas of a practically iden-
tical facies, which has been demonstrated for the greater part of
the world, clearly establishes the claims of the faunal element as the
guide propre in the determination of chronology. It not only serves
to fix the relative sequence of formations for any one country, but
determines absolutely the position in time which these formations
oceupy in a geological scale constructed for the entire world.
It is, however, contended, and apparently with force, that certain
physical phenomena associated with the disposition of rock-masses
are as clearly consecutive in their occurrence as is the progression of
the life series, and might, hence, claim equal importance as chrono-
logical determinants of the geological scale. Thus, it is pointed out,
we have the world over a physical break of definite importance be-
tween the Paleozoic and Mesozoic series of rocks, and a somewhat
similar break—-wanting in some parts—between the Mesozoic and
Kainozoic ; and, again, minor breaks between the lesser formations.
But how could the equivalence of these breaks be determined were
it not for the predetermination of age through the faunal remains? It
might be assumed, where a deposit of a definite or special litholog-
ical character can be continuously followed, such as coal or the chalk
of the Cretaceous period, that we are furnished with certain distinct-
ive data which here preclude the possibility of mistaking the act-
ual equivalence; that, for example, where we recognize the break
following the chalk in England we recognize a similar break in
France and Belgium, and likewise the same for the coal. But
by what method, other than the paleontological one, could the post-
Cretaceous break be identified or correlated in regions, such as the
Eastern United States, where the true chalk is wanting, and where
the beds representing it could, from lithological character, about as
well be taken to represent an older member of the series to which
they belong as a newer one?
The notion held by some geologists that the true determinants of
a formation—or, more properly speaking, the true measure of geo-
logical time, is found rather in the lithological than in the paleonto-
logical record, can not for a moment stand the test of a logical in-
quiry. To submit, for example, that the matter of continuous sed-
imentation, or the absence or presence of conformability, or the ex-
istence or non-existence of a physical (lithological) break, can in
any way affect a time-record based upon the uninterrupted succession
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 321
of progressive faunas, requires for its acceptance facts of a very
different character from any that geology has thus far brought for-
ward. It is true that geologists may have erred in locating or defin-
ing their time-periods (or formations), and, doubtless, more accur-
ate research will alter, or completely obliterate, much that has been
done in the way of chronological classification, but to maintain, as
some geologists would lead us to believe, that the Cretaceous and
Tertiary formations (or periods) no longer exist as such by virtue
of the discovery of a series of intermediate connecting beds; or that,
for a somewhat similar reason, the Oligocene formation has given
up its right to existence independently of the Eocene, is main-
taining a position which no geologist who has examined into the
premises will be willing to concede. We may as well admit that
the various periods recognized in human history do not exist because
they can be continuously traced without break of any kind; and
similarly, centuries and years have no existence because they are
continuously consecutive. The geologist should bear in mind that
the time-periods (et conseq. the corresponding formations) are arti-
ficial constructions based upon equivalent phenomena for the entire
world, and serve only for the purpose of a universal classification.
The finding of an intermediate formation (period) in no way oblit-
erates the formations between which it may have been found, pro-
vided the limits of these formations have been satisfactorily deter-
mined ; for example, the discovery of a connecting series of deposits
between the true Cretaceous and Tertiary, uniting them by way of
continuous sedimentation, does not render the entire series Cretaceo-
Tertiary, but the connecting beds are alone entitled to this designa-
tion. The Cretaceous and Tertiary sections of the series remain as truly
Cretaceous and Tertiary in a general scheme of classification as they
were before the intermediate beds were discovered. Manifestly, in
a complete geological scale, whose near realization is by no means im-
possible, all the various formations now recognized will be found
united to one another through the intermedium of connecting beds,
but certainly no geologist will go so far as to urge that, for this rea-
son, a classification of time, based upon some artificial basis of chro-
nology, will no longer be necessary or desirable.
It has also recently been objected that a classification based upon
percentages of survivals is an absurdity, and wholly illogical. Why
illogical, it might be asked? Surely, if there has been a general,
and nearly equivalent, faunal succession or development for the
322 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
world at large—a condition which can, be clearly demonstrated—
then, manifestly, the ratio of survivals must.be a definite measure
of this development; and if this is the case, it must, necessarily,
prove the safest guide in the delimitation of chronological bounda-
ries. Were it possible to definitely determine the proportion of sur-
vivals, or what is practically equivalent to the same thing, determine
the amount of actual faunal peculiarities, by specific determinations
made with equal care for all countries, we would then have, and
only then, a rational basis for a systematic classification applicable
to the whole world.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 323
CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE LIFE-HISTORIES OF PLANTS.
BY THOMAS MEEHAN.
Amphicarpea monoica—* Flowers of two kinds—those of the
upper many-flowered racemes perfect and petaliferous, but seldom
maturing fruit, those near the base of the stem on prostrate branches
imperfect, but usually fertile.” Thus writes Torrey and Gray, and this
I think is usual experience. Mr. Darwin, says in “Forms of Flowers”
“In three of the genera (Leguminose known to produce cleistogamic
flowers) namely Vicia, Amphicarpea, and Voandesia, the cleisto-
gamic flowers are produced on subterranean stems. The perfect
flowers of Voandesia, which is a cultivated plant, are never said to
produce fruit, but we should remember how often fertility is affected
by cultivation.” (Chap. VIII, p. 327) “Although cleistogamic
flowers never fail to yield a large number of seeds, yet the plants
bearing them usually produce perfect flowers, either simultaneously
or more commonly at a different period, and these are adapted for
or admit of cross-fertilization” (ibid p. 340).
I had often gathered the seeds, near the ground on plants growing
in shaded woods and thickets, and supposed I was familiar with it.
In December of 1886, walking along the banks of the Wingohoc-
cing creek, which runs through my farm, I noted quantities of dry
legumes on dead vines that had profusely covered .masses of black-
berry bushes. I could have gathered pounds of seed. I had never
seen Amphicarpea in this condition, and was so completely off my
guard, that I was amazed, on a package being returned from Prof. Asa
Gray marked “Amphicarpea monoica.” I decided to watch the behav-
ior of the plants more closely another year.
I now find the petaliferous flowers on these plants abundantly
fruitful. In what may be termed the more vigorous racemes, the
two lowermost flowers either have no petals, or have but a small
vexilla projecting a little beyond the calyx. The next half dozen
flowers, are perfect in every respect, and are fertile. The succeed-
324 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
ing flowers usually fall without perfecting a legume. It may be
noted that the legumes and calyx
ee are different in these two instances,
Fig. 1, shows the petaliferous and Fig.
2 the apetalous, forms. Thus we
have three forms of legumes on the |
one plant, the hypogeous, which is
short, thick and roundish at the end,
Fig. 4, and these two now described.
The apetalous flowers can be
scarcely classed as cleistogene, for
there is certainly no pollen in many
Fic. 4. of them. In the few score I ex-
amined at this time, a few undeveloped stamens could be detected
here and there. In the absence of positive demonstration, I should
rather regard these as pistillate flowers, receiving. their pollen
from the petaliferous ones.
I do not find the flowers are adapted to cross-fertilization, except
in the moncecious manner indicated. In the petaliferous cases the
flowers are diadelphous—one stamen being wholly distinct from
the rest. These are thoroughly united into a tube for very nearly
their full length, little more than the connective of the anthers being
free. The pistil, running up this tube, is about the exact length,
and the stigma is imbedded in the thick mass of stamens, and com-
pletely covered by own-pollen. It is evident that no foreign pollen
can possibly reach the stigma. So tightly held together is the mass of
filaments, that when the fertilized pistil commences to expand, the
ovarium bursts out at the base of the column, and as
it grows, draws down through the staminate column,
the style, this giving the stigma another full dose of
its own-pollen. (Fig. 3.) It is a remarkable adapta-
tion for self fertilization. Besides this close cover-
Fic. 3. ing of the stigma by the stamens and column, the keel
embraces the stamens so closely that even the “tickling” of the flower
with a pin, simulating the action of an insect, fails to set them free.
As soon as the ovarium begins to grow, and the flowering stage has
reached the period illustrated in Fig. 3, the petals fall apart, and
the pollen is liberated for the wind to carry it elsewhere.
Persistent watching failed to note any insects at work, but numer-
ous blossoms of Jmpatiens fulva, possibly aftorded the greater attrac-
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 325
tions at the time of my observations. The bruised petals of Am-
phicarpea, showed that, at some time during the day or night, in-
sects were at work on the flowers.
The large vigorous blossoms on these plants were of a brilliant
purple. The plants which I have seen with whitish-yellow flowers,
in other localities, grow weaker than these. They also produce
Jezumes from apetalous flowers on the climbing stems, but the local-
ity is not near enough for me to watch, to see whether the petali-
ferous flowers bear freely or not.
Fruiting as these flowers do, on the climbing branches, at least,
there are two-thirds fall without seeding. This cannot be from im-
potency of the pollen, or none would seed. Few leguminose plants,
even when exposed to cross-fertilization, perfect more than a small por-
tion of their flowers. Failure is from too great a draft on the nutritive
powers of the plant. So many flowers cannot be properly fed, though
properly fertilized by pollen. The remarks of Mr. Darwin on Voande-
sia, areno doubt just, changing the word cultivation so asto read “we
should remember how often fertility is affected by circumstances.”
I have already placed on record that the petaliferous flowers of
Viola cucullatu rarely produce seed under ordinary circumstances,
but freely do so when the plant is growing on a dry rockery.
The points I regard as rendered certain by these observations are:
1. That the climbing stems, as well as the trailing ones, of Amphi-
carpoa bear apetalous flowers freely.
2. ‘That these flowers produce a third form of legume.
3. That the petaliferous flowers, under circumstances favorable to
nutrition, bear lezumes as freely as leguminous plants generally.
4. That the petaliferous flowers are adapted solely to self-fertiliza-
tion, and I think the probability is developed :
That the apetalous flowers are often fertilized by pollen from the
petaliferous ones; and, so far the plant is arranged for as much
cross-fertilization as other moncecious plants receive.
A contribution to the life history of Cephalanthus occidentalis.
The pistils of Cephalanthus occidentalis are exserted more than an
inch beyond the flowers, and as there are usually from one hundred
to three hundred flowers in the button-like head, the mass has a wel!
known trichodic appearance. I had never been able to see these
extending themselves. The flowers were always either closed or fully
expanded with the pistils to their full length. Satisfied that the
opening took place during the night, I cut a few on the evening of
326 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
Aug. Ist. and placed them in a glass of water in my library, and
watched their behavior.
The unopened flower, at 7 P. M., is very interesting from a small
tooth bearing a black gland, seemingly situated in the axis between
the lobes. It is really on the left hand side of*each lobe, and gives.
to each division when carefully separated the outline of a mitten,
where in covering the hand the thumb only is free. At 8 P. M.
the lobes have parted, and what one would take to be a pair of uni-
ted sagittate anthers, covered with pollen, have advanced just their
length above the corolla-lobes. At 8°5, this length is doubled. The
same progression continued till 8°30 when growth ceased, the slender
“filament” having grown six lines in thirty minutes.
_ Examining next the four anthers in the open flower, they were found
apparently destitute of pollen, and, remembering that systematists had
found a close relationship between Rubiaceew and Composite, the idea
suggested itself that the stamens in the corolla were sterile, and that
in some unaccountable manner two stamens had become as entirely
consolidated with the style as in Orchidew, and that only two fer-
tile anthers were left, which had united and formed a cap wholly
covering the stigma. Acting on the suggestion a pair of fine tweezers
were placed under the seeming anthers, and a gentle lift took it off,
as if it were a thimble in miniature, leaving a clear greyish-white
ovate stigma behind. The sagittate form of an anther is so plain,
and the four angles that these would make united back to back so
apparent, that lam satisfied no one, at first thought, would take them
for anything else than as described. Full of enthusiasm over the
mystery I sent some to my friend Mr. Sereno Watson, to learn what
he would think of the “missing link” in this pair of monodelphous
anthers. His reply that he found some grains of pollen in the true
anther sacs, and only pollen on the stigma, led me to look into the
matter again, and I found he was right. The four anthers mature
before the pistil takes its rapid start. At anthesis the anthers are
pressed firmly over the stigma. When the growth of the pistil oe-
curs, the stigma wipes out, almost clean, the entire mass of pollen, —
and so nicely as to retain the form of the anther lobes on the stigma
as the style develops. I have since found that this simulation of the
form of real anthers is not seen in the open air. The motion of the
atmosphere or possibly the jar from the visits of nocturnal insects
gives a rounded form to the stigma-covering mass.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 327
After twenty four hours, a portion of the clear stigma is seen above
the mass of pollen, showing that the stigma expanded a little after
the growth of the style had been completed.
I think it is conceded that plants have not atime for the opening
of flowers from which they never depart, and that exceptions have
been noted in even very regular habits. But it may be stated in a
general way that the flowers of this Cephalanthus open rapidly, soon
after dark, and never during the day time.
The odor of the flowers is singularly grateful. They are visited
by large numbers of insects for their nectar day and night. No
pollen gatherers seem to work on them. There is indeed no chance
to collect it from the stigma, no platform affords a facility for stand-
ing during collection. The pollen remains on the stigma till the
whole dries away. It is one of the most complete adaptations for
self-fertilization known to me outside of the Cleistogene class.
Interested in noting how this absolute in-and-in breeding affected
productiveness, I subsequently found the flowers remarkably fertile.
Numerous seeds were in every head examined. Carefully dissecting
one, I found it had 279 flowers, of these 225 perfected seeds, and
only 54 failed.
In describing Cephalanthus occidentalis in Flora Cestrica, Dar-
lington describes the flowers as “five lobed ;” most other botanists
“four-parted.” My flowers were mostly four, but many five-parted.
The glands between the lobes of the corolla appear to have been
unnoticed. That the receptacle is “filiferous” has long been observed
(Loureir’s Flora of Cochin China, 1788), and Gray (Synoptical
Flora of North America 1884) notes that these “setiform bractlets”
between the flowers are glandular-capitate. Donn (Dichlamydeous
Plants, 1834) notes “in the American species glands none in calyx
or corolla.” They are so easily noted in these specimens before me,
that it is singular they should have been over-looked. There
are four of these ‘“‘setiforme bractlets” at the base of each floret, and
they are slightly squamiform at the base. They are nearly alternate
with the lobes of the calyx, starting from a little to one side of the
sharp angle that terminates at the base of the division of the calyx.
The setiform bractlet is just the length of the tube of the calyx, and
if adherent to the calyx, the gland would be just where it is sit-
uated in the lobes of the corolla. No one ean fail to see the gland
on the corolla is the analogue of that on the setiform bractlet.
We have no hesitation in concluding that there is primarily another
328 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF . [1887.
series of bractlets between the calyx and corolla, and that they have
become confluent with the corolla. On this theory the lobes of the
corolla should be opposite and not alternate with those of the calyx.
After this theory had suggested itself, examination of the flowers
showed it was correct. The lobes of the corolla are opposite the
lobes of the calyx.
The close relationship of Rubiaceze to Compositee has often been
remarked on. There are some correspondences in these observations
worthy of note:-—
Mr. Darwin remarks (Effects of Cross and Self-fertilization, p.
173, 1877) that “Composite are well adapted to cross-fertilization,”
and Professor Asa Gray (American Agriculturist) adopts the same
view, referring to the ray-florets as if they were flags to attract in-
sects. Adaptation, is however, chiefly inferred from the fact that
the stigma, pushed up through the column of anthers, and cov-
ered with pollen, generally cleaves at the summit. The interior
faces thus seem destitute of pollen, and must receive it from some
external agency. The author of the present paper has, however,
shown by careful observation on the flowers of Chicory, that the
pollen grains fall into the cleft as the lobes of the stigma diverge.
Many experiments by enclosing flowers of different genera in fine
gauze, resulted in the florets seeding just as well as when exposed
to the visits of insects. He has, therefore, always contended that
the supposed arrangements for cross-fertilization in Composite were
deceptive, and that the species are generally closely self-fertilizers.
In further support of this view he has called attention to the fact
that in plants conceded to be dependent mainly on external aid for
pollen, a large number of flowers never get fertilized at all, while in
self fertilizers failure rarely occurs. | Composite come squarely into
this class. The hermaphrodite florets rarely—one might also add,
if ever—fail to perfect their seed. The remarkable fertility of the
self-pollenized florets in the heads of Cephalanthus, deserve to be
noted in correspondence with the self-pollenized florets of Composite.
The “‘bractlets” at the base of the flowers, are the analogues of
the scales on the receptacles of Composite.
The bractlets, or a cycle of floral parts similar to and succeeding
bractlets, unite with the corolla-tube, and form intra-lobular teeth
in Cephalanthus. May not certain forms of seta (Helianthus, He-
liopsis, ete.) be bractea that have become confluent with the calyx,
their apices forming the setaceous teeth? It is dithicult to determine
»
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 329
this point from the want of correspondence in number (abortion ?)
of some of the parts; but it is worthy of note that in the two genera
just named, and others, where these teeth exist, a tooth is always
alternate with the main “lobe” that distinguishes the ray from the
tubular floret.
I think it will be conceded that, given a very little arrestation, de-
velopment, union or separation of parts as we find them in Cephal-
anthus, it would not be difficult to construct a Composite flower.
Amorpha canescens, Nutt—Amorpha_fruticosa, has leaves gland-
ular pellucid punctate, the dots being irregular in size. The legumes
are covered by very large glands, also irregular in size. In the
leaves of Amorpha canescens the pellucid dots are also irregular, and
in many leaflets so indistinct that one should scarcely note their ex-
istence, only that we are looking for them. In the legumes, however,
the glands are large and abundant, and readily observed through
the dense mass of woolly hair that envelopes them. The point is
worth noting. The carpels, morphologically leavés, usually have
many characters suppressed in the progress of development from the
primordial leaf to the carpel; but here we find characters existing in
a marked degree in the leaves of an allied species, and nearly sup-
pressed in its own foliage, reappearing as a strong feature in the
legume.
During anthesis many interesting points present themselves. The
anthers are fully formed and exhibit their yellow surfaces through
the bursting sepals, when they seem to have their further growth
arrested, and the pistil only elongates. It extends to double the
length of the calyx. This is the work of the first day of opening.
The next day the stamens lengthen, but one at a time. As soon as
the first one has reached the exact length of the pistil, another starts
into growth, then another, until towards the end of the day’s work
all are of about equallength. Soon after reaching its final growth
the anther sacs burst, and thus one after another, in regular succes-
sion, the pollen is ejected from the cells. On the third day the
pistil recurves, the apex forming a right angle with the base, and
usually having its stigmatic apex in among the withered stamens of
the flowers lower on the spike. All this time, the only petal pos-
sessed by the flower, the vexillum, has remained nearly quiescent.
It projects its beautiful blue tint just a little beyond the calyx, the
second day, after the last stamen has made its growth; but it is not
till the third day that it makes a growth in earnest, when it goes on
22
330 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887,
rapidly, not, however, reaching quite the length attained by the sta-
mens and pistil.
The observation worth recording here is that the bright corolla
is often referred to in modern times, as being colored in order to
attract insects to aid in the work of cross-fertilization. The col-
ored corolla does not appear here until fertilization has been effected,
which is evidenced by the recurving of the pistil. The orange-gold
of the anthers would of themselves be sufficiently attractive; and the
later effect of the vexillum, wholly superfluous, if mere attraction
were the sole end nature had in view. Although the pistil matures
a whole day before the stamens mature, the stigma receives the pol-
len often from the stamen of the same flower, or from those in the
immediate vicinity, and which matured the day before, which is self-
fertilization,—cross-fertilization being, according to Darwin, the re-
ception of pollen from another plant. The flowers seem very grate-
ful to the pollen gathering insects. After cleaning out the orange-
colored pollen, from the woolly linings of the cell, by the insect, the
empty white anthers, gave an additional interest to the orange and
blue of the more perfect flowers.
The explanation of the late growth of the vexillum is evidently
that growth is reflex—from the central axis downwards, as we see
in Liatris and other Composite. After the axis, as represented by the
pistil, has finished its growth, the spiral uncoils downward, and per-
mits of the axial growths that the floral parts represent, beginning
with the most advanced stamen, and running back to the petal,
which of course would be the outermost verticil in the coil.
Oxybaphus hirsutus— Oxybaphus, says an old writer of the Linnean
School “is a genus of the class Triandria.” “The only known species
is Oxybaphus viscosus. It is a native of Peru, and is nearly allied to
Mirabilis, under which genus it is ranged by Cavanilles, but was
made a distinct genus by L’Heritier, on account of its only having
three stamina, and the calyx enlarged and peltate, attending the
fruit.” In those times to have three stamens was an essential char-
acter of the genus, In Gray’s Manual, O. nyctagineus being the
only one described, the genus has “stamens mostly three.” In Coul-
ter’s Flora of Colorado “stamens usually three” is the record. As it
is stated of Mirabilis by Coulter “stamens usually five,” it is evident
modern authors, equally with the founder of the genus, look to the
number of stamens as in some measure a generic character. So far
as I can find in works to hand, the number of stamens is not specially
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 301
noted in any description, except in the one case of O. coccineus in
Rothrock’s Report of the Wheeler Expedition. Choisey in DeCand-
olles Prodromus has “stamina 5” as one of the characters of the whole
genus. In view of this uncertainty it is worth placing on record,
that O. hirsutus, Sweet, always within my observations, has five
stamens. I have had plants growing from seed gathered by me in
Southern Colorado a number of years ago, and the plants uniformly
have five stamens.
The flowers always open towards evening. On August 10th, I sat
myself to watch their unfolding. At 4 P. M. one could just trace
the pink color line, with a portion of a filament discernible ; by 4°30
the stamens and pistil were fully exserted, over an inch in length
beyond the perianth, the segments of the perianth were partially ex-
panded, but were crumpled, and by 5 these were-fully expanded, and
the flower perfectly in bloom. Hundreds opened, but the anthesis of
all was simultaneous. The involucre is three-flowered, but one
opens first, and we may call this a central one. The two lateral
open together the next day.
It is interesting to watch the expansion of the flower. The sta-
mens in vernation are incurved. The anther seems to be caught
in the imperfectly open flower. The filament, as it elongates, forms
a loop. When the half hour of growth has been nearly reached,
the perianth by that time expanding a little and, freeing the anther
from pressure, the incurved portion springs suddenly forward, and
instantaneously we have the long, straight, exserted stamen. In all
that I noted the stamens proceeded thus: one at a time successively,
the whole five occupying about two minutes to straighten out.
The flowers continue open all night; but commence to close by
day-light in the morning.
I have noted on other occasions that some plants do not keep
good time any more than some watches. I thought to repeat the
observations on the evening of the 11th. Strange to say at 5 P. M.
there were no more signs of opening than on the preceding day at
4, At6 P.M. only one flower was open. At 7°30 they were all
fully open as the day before at 5. It was a very dark and cloudy
afternoon, heavy rain with lightning at 6°30. As most evening
flowers seem favored by moisture and darkness, this contrary ob-
servation is worth recording.
The growth of the pistil is coincident with that of the stamens,
and is of equal length. The anther cells burst at once on the stamen
332 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
reaching its full length. The pollen is remarkably large, there be-
ing only about 25 grains in each cell. The stigma seems receptive
co-incident with the maturity of the pollen. There is nothing to
suggest any special arrangements for cross-fertilization. The flow-
ers are odorless. Moths visit the flowers freely. ‘The moth remained
a long time feasting on a single flower, generally from two to three
minutes. It used the mass of filaments with the style for a platform
on which to work for the nectar at the base of the style. Its mo-
tions would tend to shake the pollen out into the flower’s own stigma
and aid in self-fertilization. Large numbers of the flowers on my
plants are barren. Many have not one, some have but one, and
rarely are there two seeds in a single involucre.
Besides the three flowers that are produced in each jnyohaael
cup, a branch occastonally proceeds from the same axis. The flow-
ers are usually regarded as apetalous, but a close examination of an
opening flower is strongly suggestive of an amalgation of the corrol-
line and calycine whorls in one perianth. As the flower is opening
the bud presents what a superficial examination would regard as
a five-cleft calyx, with green-lance-linear and hairy segments, and
it would be a surprise to an original observer to find a mono-pet-
alous corolla, wholly in one piece with what appeared to be a dis-
tinct calyx. At the apex of one of the segments, and which by the
way are alternate with what should be petals, there are two small
pin-like, white glands; at the apex of another one gland; and at the
apex of a third a small and imperfect one. This indicates that the
elementary parts forming the floral whorl did not coil rapidly on its
spiral course; as also does the successive development of the sta-
mens; we may reasonably look for some irregular flowers among its
congeners. ;
Irritability in the Stamens of Echinocactus.—It has been long
known that the stamens of many Opuntias are irritable or sensitive
when fully expanded under a hot sun. I have placed on record
that this character extends to other allied genera. This summer I
noted that the stamens of Echinocactus Ottonis, were particularly
irritable.
Diurnal opening of the flowers of Magnolia glawca—My brother
Joseph called my attention to the fact, that cut flowers of Magnolia
glauca, in water in our office, opened at4 P. M. I found this to be the
case also with plants growing in the open air, no matter whether the
sun was shining, or the sky cloudy. They open at 4 P. M. but close
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 333
again before nightfall. The next day at 4, they open again, the
anthers shed their pollen and then the petals close again. At
4 the third day they again expand, and continue expanded for some
days till they fade.
334 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
NOTES ON THE ANATOMY OF ECHIDNA HYSTRIX.
BY HENRY C. CHAPMAN, M. D.
The specimen of Echidna hystrix upon which the following
observations were made, lived in the gardens of the Zoological
Society of Philadelphia about six weeks, spending most of its time
entirely covered by the six inches of earth at the bottom of the cage.
Its habit of feeding was similar to that of the ant-eaters, the tongue
(Pl. XIV, 2) being slender and projected through the maxillary
opening to the extent of about three inches. Under the artificial
conditions of confinement it appeared sluggish. During life it-was
noticed that the position of the feet was such as to project the big toe
outward, the soles being turned upward and backward.
A thick panniculus carnosus muscle covered the whole animal.
A long slender muscle arose from the lower ribs on each side and
was inserted in the soles of the anterior feet while a corresponding
muscle arose from the tuberosity of the ischium to be inserted in the
caleaneum. Otherwise there was nothing unusual about the mus-
cles of the extremities. Those of the fore limbs were, however,
enormously developed.
The salivary glands, (Plate XIV, fig. 2, s,) were of large size, two
inches in length, with well developed ducts which terminated by
small openings in the floor of the mouth. The small intestines were
one hundred and two inches and the large, fifteen inches in length.
The latter terminated in the cloaca (Pl. XV, fig. 2, ¢.) At the
union of the small with the large intestines a short vermiform ap-
pendix was observed. The mucous membrane of the intestines
was smooth throughout its entire tract, no valvulae conniventes
being observed as in Orinthorhynchus. Peyer’s patches were well
developed in the small intestines.
Three vena cavae were present, two anterior and one posterior as
in marsupials. Reta mirabile were observed in the iliac and bra-
chial veins. The blood corpuscles were zc'o0 of an inch in diameter,
the blood itself being loaded with quadrilateral crystals.
The spleen (Pl. XV, 1.) was a triangular gland. The liver was
four lobed and was provided with alarge gall bladder. The pancreas
was well developed, its duct, contrary to the usual arrangement, passing
into the iatestine at a point nearer the pyloric orifice than the
bile duct. The kidneys (Pl. XV, 2, k.) were of equal size. The
Proc, Acad. Nat. Sei. Philada. 1887, PI. XIV.
E.J. N, Del.
Chapman on Echidna.
E.JU. N. Del,
7
Proc, Acad.Nat. Sct. Philada.188
Chapman on Echidna,
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 339
two ureters passed into the urogenital canal, the bladder opening into
the latter separately, as did also the vasa deferentia from the testicles.
While the anterior extremity of the urogenital canal thus received
the openings of the bladder, the ureters and the spermatic ducts, it
divided at its posterior extremity into two passage-ways, the posterior
_ of which led into the cloaca, the anterior into the peneal urethra.
The penis lay next to the wall of the cloaca and was attached thereto
by fibrous tissue, the posterior ends being free and unattached to the
pelvis. The glands were composed of four mammilloid processes pro-
vided with minute papillae. The posterior orifice of the urethra was
probably pushed during coition towards the orifice of the spermatic
ducts so as to form a continuous canal with the latter, thus prevent-
ing the escape of semen into the cloaca. No trace of a mammary
gland was found.
The brain (Pl. XIV, 1) differed from that of Ornithorhynchus in
being much convoluted. As regards the corpora quadrigemina, the
nates were well developed but the lines of demarcation between them
and the testes and between the testes themselves were very obscure.
The corpus callosum was developed only in its anterior portion.
The thalamus opticus and hippocampus major were remarkably
prominent.
A little spur was present on the caleaneum as in Orinthorhynchus,
but the gland and duct with which it communicated were much
smaller and placed not so high up on the leg as in the latter. As
this spur was present only in the male it may be a sexual appen-
dage. The animal had been observed by Mr. A. E. Brown, the
superintendent of the garden, to clean its spines by means of its
hind limbs, and the secretion of oil from fhe gland which is dis-
charged through the spur may merely assist in this process.
NoveEMBER 1, 1887.
Mr. JoHn H. REDFIELD, in the chair.
Twenty-seven persons present.
The death of Frederick Graf Marshall, a correspondent, was
announced.
Note on the Sense of Direction in a European Ant, Formica
rufa.—Dr. Henry C. McCook remarked that during the summer he
had made an observation upon the well known “horse ant’, or
336 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
Formica rufa of Great Britain. While visiting the Trosachs of
Scotland he found a number of nests of this species scattered through-
out the glen known as the Pass of Achray through which flows the
little Achray River, “the stream that joins Loch Katrine to Achray.”
These nests are found on either side of the foot-walk which leads
from the Trosachs glen to “the sluices,” as they are popularly called,
which regulate the stage of water in Loch Katrine.
1. Structure of the Ant Hills—The mounds raised by the Rufous
ants are heaps of earth intermingled with chippage of various sorts;
they rise to the height of about three feet, and some of them are six
or seven feet in diameter across the base. They stand amid the
tall bracken which overhangs them, and at times almost conceals
them from the passer by. The surface of the mounds is covered with
bits of straw and leaves, stalks of grass and ferns and various
material of like sort which forms a quite decided thatch. Numbers
of openings appear upon the surface at irregular intervals from the
summit to the base, and in the afternoon at 4 o’clock the workers in
vast numbers were dragging the chippage back and forth apparently
engaged in closing the doors for the night, although time did
not permit an observation of the actual closure.
2. Character of Roads and Engineering Skill—That which es-
pecially attracted Dr. McCook’s attention was the character of the
roads leading from the ant hills to the various points in the sar-
rounding woods. These roads or trails were distinctly marked upon
the surface of the ground, having in places a width of from two to
four inches which was stained a dark brown or black, probably by
the formic acid exuded from the insects; the leaves and grass upon
which the trail was made were presse ,d down and smoothed by
the constant action of innumerable legs upon the surface. So well
marked were the trails that even without the presence of the columns
of insects that thronged back and forth upon them, they were dis-
tinctly and easily traced. While following up one of these roads
the observer was impressed by the fact that it showed scarcely any
deviation from astraight line. In order to test this matter more care-
fully, he selected a large mound from which three roads radiated.
These were all traced to their termination at three several oak trees,
up which the columns of ants ascended in search of food supply
from numerous aphides which infested the branches of the trees.
The ant roads were then carefully marked out by stakes stationed
at short intervals, a course which was made necessary by the fact
that they were carried for considerable distances beneath the, tall
bracken, which had to be pushed aside in order to reveal them.
The result of his observations is as follows:
Road No. 1 was 21 paces in length (about 65 feet) and was
carried in an almost perteeey straight line from the nest to the
terminal tree. No. 2 was 23 paces in length, (about 70 feet). It
varied less than three inches from a direct line measuring from the
nest to a point within two feet of the terminal tree. There the
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 337
column made a detour of about six inches from the straight line, but
an abandoned path, continuous with the main road, which had
apparently been used at a recent date, was traced for a considerable
distance further without any deflection. No. 3 was the longest road
of the three, being 34 paces in length. It extended for six paces in
a straight line from the nest, at which point it touched an old stump
faith evidently deflected the path at a slight angle. From this
point it was again continued in a nearly straight line as far as the
beaten foot- path through the wood. Here the ant trail was oblitera-
ted by the friction of passing human feet, but the ants themselves
thronged over the pathway in a column much broadened by continual
interference and loss caused by foot passengers. The trail was, how-
ever, resumed at a point nearly opposite that at which it touched
the path, and was continued again in a straight line six paces
further to the tree, where it terminated. "When the entire
trail was staked off it was found that its terminus deviated less than
three feet from a straight line drawn from the point of departure at
the ant hill. The greater deviation in this case seemed evidently to
have been caused by the peculiar difficulties in the chosen track.
The three roads so radiated from the nest that they were included
within about one quadrant of a circle, of which the two shorter
trails might represent the radial boundaries of the quadrant, while
the longer trail was drawn nearly midway between the two.
Taking the results of the three observations together it is mani-
fest that the ants showed an accurate sense of direction in marking
out and following their approaches to the trees. It would be scarcely
reasonable to attribute such mathematical accuracy as above shown
to mere accident. The roads in point of directness were as accurate-
ly laid down as ordinary roads made by the engineering skill of
men. The skill of the ants was all the more apparent from the fact
that their paths were carried through the jungle of bracken and
various other wood plants. The same fact appears to indicate that
the insects could not have been largely directed by the sense of
sight.* It would perhaps be idle to speculate upon the manner in
which this feat of emmet engineering was accomplished, as there
were no facts observed which give a clue to the mode of proceeding,
but the problem is one well worth study by naturalists on the
ground.
3. Engineering of Texas Cutting Ants. . McCook in this con-
nection alluded to an observation which has heretofore been placed
on record’ describing an underground route of the cutting ant of
Texas, Atta fervens. This route extended 448 feet, entirely beneath
the surface of the earth, at some places as deep as six feet, and hay-
* The vision of ants is probably limited within a very short distance from
the eyes; under any circumstances, therefore, it could have but little influence in
determining such a phenomenon as here recorded. H.C. McC.
1 See the anthor’s Tenants of an Old Farm, p. 264; fig. 90.
338 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
ing an average depth of eighteen inches. From the points at which
the ants came to the surface, the road was continued in a straight
line 185 feet further to a tree in a gentleman’s private grounds
which the ants were engaged in defoliating. The entire length of
the roadway was thus 669 feet, and the path as laid out by a young
engineer who assisted in the observation, shows scarcely less deflec-
tion from a straight course than that of the Rufous ants recorded
in the above observation.
4, Sentinels—The longest of the three trails alluded to made by
the Scotch ants terminated upon an oak tree which was also occupied
by a column of ants from a neighboring hill. The two columns
rigidly maintained their places on opposite sides of the trunk.
Sentinels were scattered along either margin of both columns and
these exhibited great watchfulness and sensitiveness to the approach
of any object. Dr. McCook on approaching his finger to these
sentinels observed that they seemed to perceive his finger when it
reached a point an inch or an inch and a half distant from the
bark. At once the ants thrust out their antennae, extended their
heads, then the two front legs, and finally the middle legs thus
hanging to the bark of the tree by the hind legs alone, the abdomen
being slightly turned underneath the body as though prepared to
eject formic acid upon any adversary. In one case at least the ant
hung to the bark by one hind foot alone, extending the whole body
in a “perpendicular direction from the surface of the tree. It presen-
ted a grotesque appearance, and exhibited every sign of eagerness
and vigilance in the discharge of its duty as watchman.
Several individuals were taken from one column and placed in
the line of march of the ants from the other nest. They showed the
usual evidences of strangeness and failed to fraternize, but on the
other hand no one was assaulted by the passers by, a toleration
worthy of note as showing some degree of community among the
various nests of the one species.
The time which Dr. McCook could give to these observations was
limited to several hours of a summer afternoon, which he spent as a
tourist in this interesting mountain region, but they present some
conclusions which appear to be reasonably decisive, and which at
least may serve to stimulate further observations in the same line
extending over greater periods and including a greater number of
cases.
NoveMBeEr 8.
Mr. CHarues Morris, in the chair.
Twenty-one persons present.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 339
NovEMBER 15.
The President, Dr. Jos. Lrrpy, in the chair.
Twenty-five persons present.
Papers under the following titles were presented for publication:—
“Note on Achines lorentzi Weyenburgh.” By David S. Jordan.
Description of two new species of Fishes from South America.”
By David 8. Jordan.
Geological Results of the Boring of an Artesian well at Atlantic
City, N. J—Mr. Lewis Woolman stated that there was commenced
in the summer of 1886 at Atlantic City, N. J. an artesian well, the
drilling of which has been since continued with some intermission
until, at the present time, a depth of 1121 feet has been reached.
During a recent cessation in the work caused by delay in the re-
ceipt of pipe for tubing the well he had been permitted through the
courtesy of the oentlemen interested in the enterprise to turn over
and examine the sands, clays and marls accumulated in the dump
heap and had found many fossil representatives of life forms,
including a bone—the articulating end of a femur or humerus of
an animal belonging to the Crocodilia,—presented by Dr. T. K.
Reed, and a few shells and fish teeth presented by Jas. H. Moore,
engineer in charge. There have been obtained from the well 52
species in all, 42 being mollusks. Many of the smaller shells were
entire and quite perfect but most of the larger ones were fragmentary,
having been broken in pieces by the drill. James H. Moore also
kindly furnished a minute description of the thickness and charac-
ter of all the sands passed through, by a careful examination of which ~
and a grouping of the smaller seams with the larger ones that give
character to formations, the speaker had constructed the following
section :—
Superficial Sands,Gravels
Sands. First 285 ft. and Clays. Wood found
at the base.
Glave 285 ft. to 416 ft. Black Clays and Sands.
“YS 1 416 ft. to 435 ft. = 19 ft. Bluish Clay.
( Greenish Clays and Marls
Clays | a oe comminuted
and marls ¢ 435 ft. to 670 ft. = 235 ft. 1 ; Hae doe cid
with fossils | and many seams of brit-
tle marly clay of gray
color.
Ennely O7O'A toeeDinty— Dt ee ee
|
=
sands.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
691 ft. to 722 ft.— 31 ft. Chocolate Clay.
Clays Fossiliferous Clays and
with fossils 722 ft. to 806 ft. 84 ft. sands; shells and sharks
L teeth.
Non-fossiliferous sands,
alternatin blackish,
Sands. (” ft. to 866 ft. = 60 ft itch od.) ee
brownin color.
Clays. ( 866 ft. to 939 ft. = 73 ft. Dark Marls and Clays.
Marls. I 639 ft. to 999 ft. = 60 ft. Green marls (various
shades) and black marls.
[ 999 ft. to 1119 ft. = 120 ft. Sands mostly yellowish
Banda green and full of bar-
a me nacles. .
ne ft.to1121ft.— 2ft. White Sands. Water
flowing to surface.
Total 1121 ft.
Prof Angelo Heilprin has kindly and very carefully examined
and identified all the specimens of fossils. The speaker has placed to
the right of each in the following list, the range along the Atlantic
Seaboard where out- -crops containing the same fossils have previously
been found—the names of the formation being those established by
Prof. Heilprin in his Tertiary Geology, in which the formation in
in the state of Maryland is divided into an older and a newer
group :—
Marylandian, Older Maryland group.
== Lower Atlantic Miocene.
Virginian, Newer Maryland group and depnate of
Miocene Virginia.
= Middle Atlantic Miocene.
Carolinian, Deposits of North and South Carolina.
= Upper Atlantic Miocene.
Anomia (probably ephippium). N.C.S.C.
Arca centenaria, N. J. Newer Md., Va., & S. C.
Arca subrostrata, Older Md. -
Arca (idonea?) Newer Md., Va., N. C.
Arca (lenosa?) N; CLS:
Artemis (acetabulum?) Newer & Older Md., Va., N.C.
Astarte compsonema, Noi
Astarte obruta, Newer Md.
Astarte perplana, Newer Md.
Astarte Thomasii, BU icee
Cardita granulata, Newer Md., Va., N. C., 8. C.
Cardita arata,
Crassatella melina,
Corbula idonea,
Corbula elevata,
Cardium (probably laqueatun),
N.J. Newer Md., Va., N.C.,8.C.
N. J. Older Md. Va., N.
Newer and Older Md.
N. J. Older Md.
ING ele ovals
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 341
Cytherea,
Discina lugubris, NaS
Donax (variabilis,?)
Fulgur,
Ineina trisuleata, S
Mactra lateralis, N.
Mactra ponderosa, Newer Md.
Mytiloconcha incurva, N. J. Older Md.
Mytilus incrassatus, 8. C.
Mysia,
Natica catenoides, J..
Nassa trivittata, J.
N
IN:
Nucula obliqua, N.
N.
N.
pe
a
ewer Md.,Va., N.C.S.C.
N.C.
Ostrea,
Pecten Madisonius,
Pecten Humphreysi,
Pecten vicenarius
Perna mazillata,
Tellina subreflexa,
Tellina declivis.
J
J. Newer Md., Va., N. C.
J. Older Md.
J.
Older Md., Va.
Turritella Cumberlandia, NEE
Turritella equistriata, IN Gxt:
Turritella plebeia, Newer Md.
Turritella (sp. not determinable),
Turbinella Woodi,
Venus.
Barnacles, Crustacea.
Femur or humerus, Crocodilia.
Tooth, Gavial.
Tooth Lamna compressa, Shark.
Tooth Odontaspis, Shark.
Tooth, species not determinable, Shark.
Teeth Myliobates, Fish.
Spine of Echinus,
Dendrophyllia, Coral,
Polyzoan,
James H. Moore had noted the depth from which the specimens
furnished by him had been taken; with this information and an ex-
amination of the sands of the dump and their contained fossils, it may
be safely concluded that of the above :—
Turritella plebeia came from a depth of about 450 ft.
Corbula elevata came from a depth of about 730 ft.
Perna maxillata came from a depth of about 800 ft.
The paleontological evidence indicates that the portion of the sec-
tion between 400 and 700 feet belongs to the Middle Miocene and
all below that to the Lower Miocene.
About 15 of the above species, it is believed, have never before
been found in New Jersey. These are from the upper layers (Mid-
dle Miocene) which no doubt exist further back from the shore, say
342 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
about 380 miles N. W., where they are buried beneath 50 to 100
feet of more recent Tertiary sands and gravels.
Most of the other species (Lower Miocene) that have previously
been noticed in the state occur at Shiloh, near Bridgeton, in Cum-
berland County, while others are found in Salem County. ‘The lower
strata from which they were obtained also probably exists in a direct
N. W. line 33 to 35 miles from Atlantic City; but these are likewise
covered by more recent Tertiary strata.
NovEMBER 22.
Rev. Henry C. McCook, D. D., Vice-President, in the chair.
Twenty-eight persons present.
Note on Cyrtophora bifurca and her cocoons, a New Orb-weaving
Spider—Dr Henry C. McCook remarked that during a temporary
stay in Florida, April 1886, he found nested upon the porch of Dr.
Wittfeld’s place, Fairyland, Merrit’s Island, on the Indian River
a little way below Rockledge, a spider which appears to be new to
science. Its snare resembles that of Cyrtophora caudata, Hentz. It
also resembles that spider in the manner of hanging its cocoon string
in the vertical axis of its orb just above the hub. The character of
the cocoon, however, differs entirely from that of caudata. It is in
the shape of a somewhat irregular octogon, and is of a light green
color. The speaker had found as many as twelve cocoons in one
string overlapping one another in the manner which he had frequen-
tly observed with the cocoons of the Labyrinth spider, (Epeira
labyrinthea Hentz) and which may also be seen at times with the
cocoons of caudata, although for the most part, the latter are arran-
ged at intervals along the string.
The cocoon strings collected varied in the number of cocoons
attached thereto,—probably according to the period of advancement
in the process of ovipositing on the part of the mother. Of the
specimens collected one string contained 14, another 12, and another
10 cocoons. They are bound together along one side by continuous
series of thick white threads which extend from the top to the bottom
of the string. Each cocoon consists of two parts which have evi-
dently been fastened together by a selvage. These parts present
the appearance of two dishes placed together edge to edge. They
are woven of a soft but rather tough texture. A very slight tuft of
flossy white silk is found inside, and within this the eggs are deposi-
ted. In one cocoon of a string of thirteen, twenty five minute dead
spiders were counted which had passed their first moult. In another
cocoon taken from a string of five only, there were twenty six.
The number varies a good deal, however. The cocooning period
appears to extend into May; at least Dr. McCook had received
from Miss Anna Wittfield, as late as the middle of June, a string
in which were some cocoons empty, one with spiderlings passed the
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 343
first moult several days, and another with young who had just
broken the egg. There was no trace of the bifurcated abdomen
upon these younglings.
The spider is of a uniform light green color, about the shade of
its cocoon. ‘The cephalothorax is of the same color as the abdomen;
in this respect differing from caudata which is black. The head
also is not so much elevated as is that of caudata. The adult female
is three-eights of an inch in length, and the only specimen of a male
obtained is about three-sixteenths of an inch in length, although it
is an immature specimen apparently lacking one moult of maturity.
The most striking characteristic of the female spider is that the
conical prolongation of the abdomen which marks the genus is dis-
tinctly cleft at the apex, giving it thus the appearance of the tail of
certain fishes and birds, and for this reason it is named Cyrtophora
bifurea. In this respect it decidedly differs from caudata whose
apex is without a cleft. On the basal part of the dorsum of the
abdomen are four conical processes arranged two on each side
symmetrically, the hind pair being the smaller. These processes
are soft resembling thus the like cones on the abdomens of the
Angulata group of Epeiroids rather than the tough spinous pro-
cesses upon Acrosoma and Giasteracantha. The spinnerets are surroun-
ded by a broad white band which extends along the venter as far as the
epigynum. The lip is sharply triangular, and the mandibles cut
square across. In both these respects the species differs from caudata.
The eyes of the front row are about equally separated from each
other, although the interval between the mid-fronts is slightly less.
The side eyes are barely separated from each other. The male speci-
men alluded to above, Dr. McCook could not certainly affirm to belong
to this spider. It resembles caudata in its general appearance, the
abdomen lacking the bifurcation which marks the female, and the
cephalothorax being of a jet black.
NOVEMBER 29.
The President, Dr. Lerpy, in the chair.
Twenty-nine persons present,
The following were elected members :—
Messrs Garvin W. Hart, Charles A. Davis, Rev. R. H. Fulton,D.D.
and Miss Mary E. Shively. .
Orville A. Derby of Rio Janeiro was elected a correspondent.
The following were ordered to be printed :—
344 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
ON THE HOMOLOGIES AND EARLY HISTORY OF THE
LIMBS OF VERTEBRATES.
BY JOHN A. RYDER.
I. The imperfect serial homology of the limbs of Vertebrates.
That any one should seriously question the complete homol-
ogy of the anterior and posterior pairs of limbs as found developed
in the great classes;—Mammals, Birds, Reptiles, Amphibia and
Lyrifera, (Ichthyes, or all fish-like vertebrates, except the Lampreys
and Hags,) is, perhaps, at first thought, a somewhat startling prop-
osition. The fact that there is an imperfect homology or a want of
exact morphological equivalency between the parts of the same pairs
of limbs in different forms, has been tacitly admitted by such of the
transcendental anatomists as Gervais and Gegenbaur, and those
anatomical philosophers who have been influenced by their a priori
methods, in developing which, certain suppositions had to be made,
which at the time, could not be or were not verifiable or refutable from
data supplied by general ontogeny or embryology. The case stands
differently to day. Since Gervais and Gegenbaur wrote on the the-
ory of the limbs, owing mainly to the remarkably fruitful labors of
Haeckel, Balfour and Dohrn, the great morphological problems
presented for solution by the organizations of the diverse classes of
vertebrata, have presented themselves under entirely new aspects.
These are not only momentous as affording a key to the interpreta-
tion of the anatomy of the adults of the different types, but also as
throwing a not inconsiderable amount of light upon the relations
and taxonomy of the major groups.
That the paired limbs have been derived from some common,
simple ancestral form of limb, is, I cannot help but believe, proved
by the following general truths :—
» 1. In the most undeveloped condition, the first traces of the
paired limbs of all vertebrates, find formal expression as low longi-
tudinal, lateral projections of the body, and lie in a plane parallel
with that of the axis of the latter. This fact originally observed by
K. E. von Baer, has in part afforded J. K. Thacher, F. M. Balfour,
and St. G. Mivart, the basis for a theory of the development of the
paired limb, but it remained for A. Dohrn to discover that there
existed a continuous series of vestigiary structures in certain forms
which connected the anterior and posterior limbs together into a
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 345
continuous chain of serially homologous or homodynamous elements
These lateral elements of the limb, are therefore, to be regarded as
metameric structures, in that they correspond with the metamerism
of the body. The fore and hind limbs are, therefore, and presuma-
bly in all forms, to be regarded as directly or indirectly differentiated
from a single pair of lateral folds, it matters not in what way the
process may be obscured by extreme secondary modifications or
specializations of development.
2. The subsidiary doctrines which confirm the preceding, may
be stated as follows :—
a. The lowest truly limb-bearing vertebrates are the only ones
in which the lateral folds, from which both pairs of limbs are derived,
are continuous or which show a continuous series of limb-buds un-
der the integument along either side of the embryo.
b. This lowest limb-bearing group is also the only one in which
the branches of the paired spinal nerves, which pass out to the met-
americally repeated limb-buds, ever form a continuous series, or in
which the paired limbs maintain their primordial horizontal posi-
tion.
c. The group here referred to, the Elasmobranchit, is, moreover,
primitive in many other ways, especially as respects :—(1) or histo-
logical development, in that no parosteal or membrane bones are
developed, as in the higher types, and, (2) or morphological devel-
opment, in that the branchiz are at first naked, with no opercule
in the adult ; skeleton principally cartilaginous; distal part of ver-
tical fins and paired limbs, supported and stiffened by actinotrichia
above, with shagreen or dermal spines covering them; teeth gener-
ally successional from a thecal fold, and transitional to the spines or
denticles found in the common external tegumentary covering of
the body; no air bladder or pneumatic apparatus; shoulder and
pelvic girdles simple; jaws and mandibular arch simple, suspended
directly to the skull ; a wide, spiracular, branchiferous cleft; gener-
ative and renal apparatus of a primitive type; muscular buds, which
are thrust into the median and paired limb-folds, with traces of a
lumen or cavity, which has been derived from the cavity found in
the myotomes, from which the muscular buds have been derived as
outgrowths or diverticula.
This evidence is quite sufficient for us at present to build upon,
for the Ascidians, Leptocardians and Enteropneusta have no claim,
as based either upon their morphology or upon their ontogeny, to
23
346 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
be regarded as forms ancestrally or phyletically related in a direct
line to the limb-bearing vertebrates. It will probably be best to
regard all of these, including the Lampreys and Hags, as extreme
retrograde modifications or as adumbrations of something higher in
the Chordate series, and indeterminate in every respect to their ex-
act position with reference to the great limb-bearing phylum. The
Elasmobranchit, therefore, alone remain as a point of departure.
It is not possible to develop a rational interpretation of the inex-
act homology of the paired limbs of the various types, in which it
may be suspected to exist, unless we start with the Elasmobranchs,
because, in the latter only, do we find the limbs in a condition which
there is every reason to regard as the most primitive. The princi-
pal mark of this primitiveness is, as before stated, the continuity, at
a certain stage, of the limb-rudiments, the elements of which are,
moreover, metamerically repeated, that is, they recur as out-growths
from each and every successive myotome of the series underlying
the paired integumentary folds, from portions of which, together
with a greater or lesser number of the underlying muscular limb-
buds and other mesoblast, the permanent limbs are finally differ-
entiated. It is probable, theretore, that the lateral limb-folds of this
primitive type may be regarded as typifying almost completely the
ideal form from which all of the various types of paired limbs have
been evolved, as seen in the various groups. That such a general-
ized (not archetypal) ancestral form may be assumed to be repre-
sented by the most generalized Elasmobranchs, (Rays and Torpedos)
will, I believe, be fully justified by the evidence, which remains to
be offered in what is to follow.
While the method by which limbs are developed in Sharks and
True Fishes, must be admitted by anatomists to be primitive, it
must not be forgotten that long limbs of functional value, such as
are possessed by Land Mammals, Birds and Reptiles, would be next
to useless and an actual impediment in the struggle for existence, if
appended to a fish. That this is true, is proved by the fin or pad-
dle-like limbs of Plesiosaurs, Ichthyosaurs, Cetacea, Sirenia and
Pinnipeds, in all of which there has occurred a gradual abbreviation,
modification and even change of the position of the limbs, in order
to economize the exertion of effort in a dense medium—water—in
which short, fin-like limbs only would be preserved by mechanical
selection. That is, the limb which presented the greatest mechanical
advantages would be the one preserved, while its adaptation—modi-
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 347
fication in a determinate direction (not hap-hazard, through fortui-
tous variation,) would be conditioned by definite retroactions be-
tween the organism and its environment, and thus gradually stamp
it with peculiar and mechanically advantageous features. This
view should. not be lost sight of; and, while it has been demonstra-
ted to the satisfaction of all anatomists, (except P. Albrecht, whose
views as to the primitive nature of the Cetacea are not borne out
upon either morphological or paleontological grounds, ) that, the ab-
errant forms alluded to above, are in all probability descendants of
land and semi-amphibious types, we are forcibly reminded by these
examples, of how the evolution of strongly marked types is directly
conditioned by the peculiar nature of their specialized environment.
_ This brings us to the question of distribution in time, or the se-
quence of forms. Here, palaeontology comes to the aid of the mor-
phologist and affords the final proof that the Fishes are veritably
the oldest of the limb-bearing vertebrates. The evidence derived
from ontogeny, comparative morphology, taxonomy and palaeon-
tology is, therefore, in accord and quite conclusive as to the main
fact of the primitiveness of the fish-like type, which is, therefore, the
only one which can be regarded as affording the direct ancestral
means through which the structural condition of the limbs of high-
er forms may be reached.
The mediate or indirect ancestry of the higher vertebrate types,
was undoubtedly, one in which there obtained a condition even more
primitive than in the most generalized of the limb-bearing fishes.
Such a type was one which probably differed from the most gener-
‘alized fish, in having the metameric elements of the paired limbs
distinct for each segment; and not coalesced or fused into a more or
less closely connected longitudinal series, covered by a simple, com-
mon fold of integument as in the latter. The only types which ap-
proach such a condition, are the existing Errant Annelids or Worms.
These, or some peculiar generalized forms of Worms were therefore,
the probable prototypes of the vertebrates as maintained by Dohrn
and Semper, and, thanks to the brilliant researches of Bateson upon
Balanoglossus, such a view has more in its favor now than ever be-
fore. Yet, here again the unwary must be cautioned, since Balano-
glossus, living as it does buried in the sand, has probably undergone
some retrogressive metamorphosis, so that it has been itself modified
and diverted out of the path leading in the direction of the descent:
of the true vertebrate forms.
348 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [ 1887.
The presence of two lateral rows of vestigiary structures, in the
position of parapodia, on either side of the tail of embryos of certain
Elasmobranchs, and on either side of the dorsal median line, oppo-
site the interval where the vertical dorsal fins are wanting, as first
described by P. Mayer, led that investigator to regard such vestiges
as parapodoid in character.
The existence of vestigiary structures of this kind, as well as
their segmented or metameric relations, which are essentially the same
in their general features, as those of the metameric elements of the
limbs themselves, lends additional probability to the doctrine, that
the vertebrates are the off-shoots of a worm-like ancestral form.
The suppression of the caudal parapodia or radial elements of the
fins in the ancestral types, which led to the differentiation of the
paired fins, may be ascribed to a number of other influences be-
sides those referred to by Dohrn, of which the following may be
mentioned,
1. If the ancestral type has been one which was at one time
tubicolous in habit, the abortion of the caudai parapodia would be
accounted for. Though, it must be admitted that this view is in
the highest degree improbable, but not impossible.
2. The late outgrowth of the tail in annelids as well as in verte-
brates, presupposes a belating of the functional activity of the cau-
dal parapodia, through which their importance and development
may have been hindered.
3. The slight use made of the parapodia of the tail as locomo-
tive organs, after the tail became laterally flattened or compressed,
since it is well known that the principal power of propulsion exerted
by fishes, is by means of the alternate flexures of the tail; the fins
aiding only in a moderate degree, their principal office being to bal-
ance or hold the body and keep it in the normal position. The ex-
ceptions to this rule are very few; the most important being that of
Mola in which the dorsal and anal fins are the sole organs of loco-
motion, as shown by the writer elsewhere.
The abortion of the caudal part of the intestine, now represented
by the post-anal gut, as it is termed by embryologists, may have
had something to do with the development of paired limbs over the
sides of what remained of the body cavity, as urged by Dohrn, but
there must have been forces at work which led to this abortive pro-
cess, by which the primitive gut was shortened. And, while it is
undoubtedly a fact that such a shortening of the alimentary tract
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 349
has occurred, giving rise to the gutless and accelomatous tail of a
number of classes, the shortening has been compensated for by the
development of intestinal coils, diverticula, pouches, rugae, folds,
follicles, crypts, glands, valves, ete., thus increasing the efficiency
of the anterior portion of the alimentary canal as a digestive appa-
ratus, so that the hinder part became useless, thus leading to its
suppression. This seems to have been the cause antecedent to the
one invoked by Dohrn.
Accepting the morphological part of the theory of Dohrn, as to
the phylogeny and ontogeny of the paired and unpaired limbs, a
difficulty has arisen as to how the parapodia became mainly dorsal
and ventral, if, as is supposed, they are derived from an ancestry in
which they were lateral. The view that the presence or absence of
the alimentary canal was an efficient cause is beset with grave diffi-
culties. A view which seems to me to be far more probable, rests
upon the exaggerated development of a very different set of paired
structures in the lower vertebrates, namely, the myotomes. The
homologous tract in the Annelids is almost equally developed around
almost the entire circumference of the somites, whereas in the ver-
tebrates their development is almost wholly lateral, especially dur-
ing the early stages. The bilaterality of the muscular system thus
finding expression in the much thickened or laterally hypertrophied
somatopleure of the primitive vertebrates, would inevitably crowd
the notopodia and neuropodia of the ancestral Annelid, toward the
ventral and dorsal edges of the body; the infolding of the medull-
ary groove would divide the somatopleure in the middle line, and
the growth forward of the stout notochord would tend greatly to aid
from beneath, in breaking the continuity of the somatopleural layer
across the median line. The suppression of the dorsal moieties of
the body cavities in the myotomes would also aid in effecting the
needed change.
With the advent of a laterally hypertrophied somatopleure, flex-
ures of the body in the ventral or dorsal, as well as lateral direction
would no longer be so well marked, and the habitual flexures of the
body now established, would be alternating ones from right to left;
thus, the habitual mode of flexure of the body of fishes would be at-
tained. The mode in which muscular contractions resulting in the
manifestation of movements would thus become more specialized
than in the annelids and be brought to the stage observed in the
lower vertebrata.
350 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
The less marked development or thickening of the somatopleure
over the lateral and ventral parietes of the body-cavity, in the prim-
itive vertebrates, would doubtless tend to affect the position of the
notopodia, from which the paired limbs are supposed to be derived,
causing them to retain their primitive place.
Thus far, only the ontogenetic theory of the limbs as been dis-
cussed, in order to prepare the reader for the evidence which is now
to be presented; many of the data are from personal studies, and
such old data as I have found available, I trust, will be brought
into such contrast with the others, as a whole, as to ore out their
morphological significance.
Il. The proof of the inexact homology of the limbs of different types.
‘The inexact homology or equivalency of the limbs of different
types of vertebrates has been suspected by authors, but no ohserva-
tions or systematic comparisons have been put upon record to show
that there were good morphological grounds for such a conception
of the nature of limbs. The exact morphological equivalency of
the pairs of limbs of different types, would require that they arise
from the sides of the same segments or somites behind the skull, for
each pair; in all species of vertebrates. If, for example, the limb-
bud of the pectoral or fore-limb arose from the fifth to the eighth -
post-occipital somites in all vertebrates, there could be no question
that the fore-limb in one was the exact homologue of the fore-limb
in every other form. Unfortunately, the facts of development and
comparative morphology unequivocally compel us to admit that
such is not the case.
1. Embryological evidence, considering especially the points of origin
of paired limbs.
The positions in which the limb bade of the same pair arise in
ditferent types varies between wide limits, and, while there are causes
which in part explain these variations, there are some complications
involved which refuse any other explanation except that which sup-
poses, that such variation in point of origin is an indication of in-
exact homology,
It may be stated asa general trnth that, the paired nerves which
go toa given limb have arisen from the somites, which were oppo-
site or beneath the limb bud or fold, from which that limb developed.
This may be shown to be true in the lower forms nearest the primi-
tive type, from which all others may be supposed to have arisen.
For example, the pelvic pair of limbs of physoclistous Fishes at first
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 301
grow out close behind the pectoral limbs, with little or no interven.
ing space between them, but notwithstanding this fact, and in spite
of an extensive subsequent translocation of the pelvic limbs forward
into a position in advance of the base of the pectorals, the paired
nerves which go to the pelvic limbs retain their primary origin be-
hind those which pass to the pectorals. In the adult physoclists,
therefore, the nerves going to the pelvic limbs, cross below those
going to the pectorals, on their way to the pelvic limbs. This re-
tention of the original nerve origins is in itself the best proof that
we can depend upon to give us a clew to the groups of somites from
which a given limb has arisen.
In many eases the origins of the paired nerves passing from the
cord are much further forward than the foramina or intervertebral
intervals which give them exit. This difficulty is probably quite
explained away by the manner in which the vertebral canal grows
in length compared with the cord. It is found, in fact, that the
vertebral canal grows in length much faster, in many forms, than
the cord, after a certain period. This causes the origins of the spinal
nerves from the cord to appear as if they had been drawn forward
some distance in advance of their points of exit from the sides of
the vertebral canal. That this is a true explanation is proved by
the fact that Kolliker has found the cord extending the entire length
of the vertebral canal in the human embryo of three months, while
the writer has found the same condition in the embryos of Cetaceans,
two inches in length. It is, therefore, obviousthat the cauda equina
in these cases is developed at a later period, and as a result of the
growth in length of the spinal or vertebral canal at a more rapid
rate than that of the included cord itself. Similar phenomena oc-
cur in the cases of certain fishes (Lophius) and Goette has described
the process in Bombinator igneus. In this last case, however, there
is more or less positive atrophy of the posterior end of the cord in
the course of development, so that only about 14 pairs of spinal
nerves can be finally identified. In Mola, not only the cord, but
the tail is also aborted to such an extent that only a very short, almost
occipital, cord remains, the paired nerves passing directly to the
lateral musculature of the vertical and paired fins, after forming a
dorsal cauda equina. The cord in the long, flagelliform, reduced
tail of the two Lyomeri, viz: Gastrostomus and Ophiognathus, shows
unmistakable signs of atrophy or degeneration, in that the cord in
the tail becomes so reduced to a mere flattened filament, that it is
302 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
with great difficulty that the white and gray matter can be distin-
guished in sections, or that any differentiation, except around the
central canal, is visible.
In the singular and remarkable case of the Cetacea the embryo-
logical evidence, here offered, is entirely reconcilable with the views
for the first time propounded by the writer upon morphological
grounds, that the distal portions of the hind limbs are represented
by the flukes. The latter being in reality the outward vestiges of
hind limbs, so that the statement in recent text-books to the effect
that, “the Cetacea are without hind limbs,” must be qualified. The
morphological evidence attainable proves beyond a resonable doubt
that the distal part of the hind limbs have been translocated back-
wards into their present position in Cetaceans, through the inter-
mediation of a type approximating the existing pinnipeds, in which
a similar process is now taking place.
In the Cetacea, the translocation of the hind limbs has been in a
backward direction or just the reverse of what has occurred in the
physoclistous Fishes. The Cetacean “lumbo-caudal plexus” which
at least furnishes the sensory branches of nerves going to those or-
gans, is therefore, either a backwardly translocated structure, simi-
lar in character to the forwardly translocated pairs of nerves going
to the pelvic limbs of Physoclists, or it may be that they represent
the modified posterior part of the system of spinal nerves, which
supply the muscles of the powerful tail and have thus acquired —
secondarily a more intimate relation to the flukes. At any rate, the
nerves, in this case, give us a far less potent argument in favor of
translocation than do the skeleton and muscles, which are alone con-
clusive, when contrasts are made between their condition in the
normal Mammalia, the pinnipeds and the Cetacea as the last extreme
of modification.
But backward translocation of limbs is not confined to Cetacea.
In all fishes so far observed by competent embryologists the pee-
torals grow out on either side of the anterior end of the trunk as a
pair of folds just behind the last pair of branchial arches. In one
group however, the embryology of which is not known, and which
will in all probability remain inaccessible to us for the reason that,
both Gastrostomus and Ophiognathus, the genera referred to, are
abyssal forms, there is every reason to believe that the pectoral
pair of fins has been translocated backwards. In the case of Gas-
trostomus bairdii, this translocation has pushed the pectoral fins
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 393:
back out of their usual place, over about thirteen segments beyond
the occiput, and the translocation of the pectoral of Ophiognathus
is scarcely less. In both these cases the translocation is due to the
extension backward of certain portions of the inferior arches of the
skull, and of the mouth, as a result of which, the branchial appara-
tus and heart have also been displaced and lost their attachment or
contiguity to the skull, while the carotid arteries have been length-
ened to an extent which is altogether without a parallel amongst
fishes.
Amongst median fins the anterior dorsal of Lophius is known
to undergo considerable displacement forward, according to the
published figures of A. Agassiz, showing the development of this
form. Even in the history of the metamorphosis of the tail in het-
erocercal types, I have attempted to show (Origin of Heterocercy)
that associated with the deflection upwards of the end of the cau-
dal axis, due to a definite combination of mechanical conditions,
there has also occurred a translocation forwards, crowding together
of the inferior basal and heemal supports of the caudal rays.
Turning again to the evidence, purely morphological and embry-
ological, we find that the last pair of spinal nerves in Phocena make
their exit at the 45th vertebra, in Man at the 27th, in Lepus at the
29th, which facts when contrasted, sufficiently prove that there have
been changes in the position of the source of the innervation of the
‘limbs. The additional evidence which we possess showing that the
hind limbs of the Cetacea and Sirenia have suffered displacement
and may not be exactly homologous with the hind limbs of other
vertebrates, consists in the fact that the hinder limb-buds (future
flukes) grow out at the sides of the cylindrical tail and but slightly
in advance of its termination, as low horizontal folds which have
degenerated into the flukes, which now consist internally of the low-
est grade of tissue, viz: fibrous connective, covered by the closely
adherent integument.
In violent contrast to this we have the mode of development of
the limbs of the Physoclisti at a parallel stage as buds or outgrowths
immediately behind and with scarcely an interval between them-
selves and the rudiments ofthe pectorals immediately in advance of
them. Asa result of this, the paired spinal nerves which innervate
the pectoral and pelvic limbs, form a continuous series with no in-
terval whatever between them as shown by the accompanying ta-
ble, while the greatest interval between the last brachial and first.
304 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
lumbo-sacral nerve is found, as would be expected, in Phoceena, where
it aggregates 16 pairs, according to the same table. We are accord-
ingly forced to admit that the nerve supply going to a given limb
is correlated with the position along the axis, at which it first grew
out in the embryo.
If it is still insisted that these comparisons are unfair, I shall now
propose some fresh difficulties to be disposed of by objectors to my
thesis, that, pairs of limbs which are apparently exactly homologous
upon superficial inspection are not necessarily the exact homologues
of each other.
Take the cases of Cottus and Esox, if you please. We find here
that in the first there is a continuous series of not more than seven
pairs of nerves, reckoning from the occiput, which supply both the
pectoral and pelvic fins. Turning now to Esoz, we find five pairs
of post-occipital nerves, which send a nerve supply to the pectoral,
then follows an interval of twelve pairs of “intercostals,” and itis
only when we reach the 18th post-occipital pair, that we first find
nerves which pass to the pelvic limb; eight pairs in all sending
branches to that limb, so that, according to the old view, we have
the preposterous conclusion that, the 25th pair of spinal nerves in
Esox are the homologues of the 7th pair in Cottus/
We find in these two cases, moreover, that the rudiments of the
pelvic limbs do not grow out at the same point, in respect to the
median axis, but inthe embryos of Cottus far in advance of the point
of origin of the same fin in the embryo of Esox. And in proof of
the fact that the pelvic fin of Cottus has not been derived by its mi-
gration forwards in the embryo, from a more posterior position sim-
ilar to that in the embryo of Esox, we have the fact that we have no
embryological evidence whatever, to show that such a translocation
occurs. In fact, the rudiments of the pelvic fins grow out from the
sides of the embryo in both genera in exactly the position required
by the position of the nerve supply in the adults.
Further, is it to be supposed that in a Bird, where there are about
ten post-occipital pairs of nerves which have nothing to do with in-
nervating the wings, it would be fair to compare the first five of
these which have no direct relation to the fore-limb, with the first
five post-occipital pairs in Esox ?
Here again, the embryological evidence is conclusive, since in
Fishes generally, the pectoral fin-fold grows out immediately behind
the last branchial arches and from what would be the cervical re-
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 355
gion in the bird, and Esow is no exception tothis rule. In the Bird
(Chick and Sparrow), I find, just as was to have been expected,
that the pectoral limb-bud (wing) does not grow out from the sides
of the cervical or anterior region of the trunk as in Fishes, but some
distance behind it. In fact, a corresponding number of somites in-
tervene between the hindermost limit of the cranium and the ante-
rior margin of the fore-limb of the embryo bird. This gives tv young
embryos of birds their peculiar long necked appearance, because
their necks are absolutely longer for morphological reasons than
those of other warm-blooded vertebrates. We find indeed, that the
fore limbs of birds are separated by a wider interval from the oral
opening or the base of the skull, than those of Mammals. This fact
will be palpably brought out, if two series of embryos of Birds and
Mammals of approximately the same relative stages are laid side by
side and compared. It will then be seen that the first traces of limb-
buds in Birds arise farther back from the head than those of Mam-
mals, thus clearly showing that the fore limbs, in the two cases, do
not arise from serially equivalent somites,
The fore-limb of the Bird, therefore, grows out and develops at a
point posterior to that at which the fore-limb of the Fish is devel-
oped ; the segmental elements which enter into the formation of the
fore-limb (pectoral) of the fish, are therefore not homonymous with
those which enter into the formation of the fore-limb (wing) of the
bird. Nor can less be said when we come to compare the early stages
of the Bird and Mammal.
This failure of the limbs to arise from an exactly homonymous
series of successive segments in different groups, shows in the clearest
manner that such difference in origin unquestionably implies the ex-
istence of inexact homology, with all the morphological consequence
which must follow.
We have also seen that sudden or rapid forward translocation of
the hind limbs during their early stages, occurs only amongst Phy-
soclists, where it has been repeatedly observed in different genera.
In Cetacea, I have elsewhere sought to explain the peculiar method
of their backward displacement in another manner, while the cases
in which it is more than probable that the fore-limbs undergo rear-
ward displacement include only one type of Fishes viz: the Lyomeri.
In no others except Pinnipeds does there appear to be the slightest
evidence of the occurrence of translocation. The defenders of the
Archipterygium hypothesis are, therefore, so far as they would avail
306 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
themselves of the theory of the translocation of the limbs, left with
nothing to rely upon. Even supposing that the phylogenetic history
is inaccurately repeated in the ontogeny of the forms here used in
illustration, how will we explain on such a supposition, the persist-
ent posterior origin of the pelvic limbs in Physostomes from folds
separated by an interval of as many as 20 somites from the pectorals,
while in Physoclists there is either a very small interval or almost
none; and why is it that the nerve supply for the limb should be
derived so constantly from the pairs underlying the point of origin
of the limb-fold? We saw, moreover, that when translocation did
occur during ontogeny, that the distal portion of the nerve supply
was carried along with the limb, while the point of the origin of the
nerve supply remained unchanged. The other cases of translocation,
which are well made out, the Cetacea and Lyomeri are not fairly to
be contrasted with that of the Physoclisti, because, in the first in-
stance the hind limbs have become totally incapable of free or
independent movement, while in the case of the Lyomeri, the fore-limbs
have become detached from the cranium, and limb and pectoral arch
so undeveloped as to present a condition which is attained by many
fresh-water forms before they leave the egg. ‘The Cetacea, Lyomeri
and Ichthyosauria, are the only vertebrates in which the pelvic or
pectoral girdle has suffered displacement, detachment or reduction,
except the Physoclisti, and, while it must be admitted that our in-
formation as to how this occurred, is for the most part only inferen-
tial and based upon comparative studies of the morphology of allied
forms, as far as regards the first three, the actual observation of how
such a process has occurred in the last named group should make us
all the more ready to expect equally remarkable revelations regard-
ing the others. And of fossil groups besides the Ichthyosauria, it
is not impossible or improbable that such as the Enaliosauria and
others, might afford profitable and suggestive contrasts. These,
however, we can have little hope of studying from the stand-point
of the embryologist, owing to the paucity of material.
The embryological evidence has now been stated, together with
such a discussion of the extent to which translocation of the limbs,
during their early stages, has had any bearing upon the questions at
issue, so that we may at once turn to the consideration of the mor-
phology of adult forms in this connection.
2. Anatomical evidence, considering especially the relations of the
spinal nerves to the limbs.
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 357
In order to make comparison easy between the various adult types,
I have tabulated the pairs of nerves which enter into the composi-
tion of the brachial and lumbo-sacral plexusés, or, as we may name
them for brevity’s sake—proplexus and postplexus, in such a way as
to show their inexact homology and homonymy at a glance. The
pairs of nerves belonging to the proplexus are indicated by the sign
x, while those belonging to the series of the postplexus are indicated
by the sign 0; these signs are also placed in the successive columns
from left to right in such an order as to indicate at once the serial
number of the nerves they stand for, as reckoned from the occipital
foramen towards the end of the tail.
The relations of the proplexus and postplexus may be graphically
represented by such a table and it is evident from a simple inspec-
tion and comparison of the limb-innervating series of spinal nerves
indicated by the arbitary signs, that there is clearly a lack of ho-
monymy of the paired limbs, if the determination of such homonymy
depends upon the origin of the paired limbs from somites, which are
distant the same number of segments from the occiput or posterior
extremity of the head.
The thirty-two pairs belonging to the proplexus of Raia eglanteria
cannot by any possible supposition be made equivalent to the third
and fourth nerves entering into the proplexus of Rana; nor can it
be shown that the proplexus of Raia is exactly homologous with
that of Esox or Cottus. Even supposing that every two or three
pairs of Raia represent morphologically, but asingle pair in Rana
and Hsox, the difficulty is not disposed of, because, while it is possi-
ble to suppose that one-half of a given number of somites in a Sela-
chian, represent a morphologically equivalent number in Teleosts or
Amphibia, there is no valid ground anywhere discoverable in mor-
phology, for supposing that the ratio of the morphological equiv-
alency, when the values of the somites of the two types are contrasted,
is greater than this. This contrast, however, does not avail, for
even upon such a supposition, one-half of the number of nerve pairs
in the proplexus of Raia is sixteen, or eleven more than in Esoz. -
The utter absurdity of this last way of bringing the proplexuses
of Raia and Esox into homonymical agreement is brought out, if
we make another contrast. In fact, it is possible to show that, if we
push the theory of multiples too far that we cannot account for the
relations of the post-plexuses of a Physostome and a Physoclist.
For, suppose the thirty-two pairs of the proplexus of Raia eglanteria
308 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
fused by fours into eight, this brings the first pair of the post-plexus
into the position of the ninth, but in the Physostomous Esow, the
the first pair of the post-plexus is the 18th, while in some Physoclists,
the first pair of the post-plexus is the fourth or fifth, a result which
makes the absurdity of such a method of reasoning still more pre-
posterous. The climax is reached when the theory of multiple
equivalency is resorted to in comparing the post-plexus of Raia and
Esox. The thirty-third to the forty-sixth pair in Raia, fourteen in
all, would be equal to about three, or a little more, pairs in the
post-plexus of Hsox, on the basis of the doctrine of multiples. This
is four less than the required number in Hsox, besides which, the
first pair would be brought into the position of the ninth instead of
the eighthteenth, its required place. Or if we took two pairs of
spinal nerves of Raia to equal one of Ksox, we should only have
seven for the post-plexus of the latter or one less than the required
number, while the first would be brought into the position of the
seventeenth instead of the eighthteenth, its required position.
The table also shows that the proplexus of Raia batis, according
to Swan, is nearly equal to the pro-and post-plexuses of Raia eglan-
teria taken together. It is also shown that the proplexus of Mus-
telus canis is made up of not quite half as many nerve pairs as that
of Raia eglanteria, and it therefore has just a third as many as R. batis.
In that it is now known that each anterior somite gives off just twice
as many muscular buds as there are somites, the buds corresponding
to as many rays, it is clear that the anterior fins of these three Elas-
mobranchs are not the exact homologues of each other, that is, the
pectoral of Raia is derived from more somites than that of Mustelus
and they can therefore not be equivalent in an exactly homological
sense.
A still further inspection of the table will enable the reader to
make many other comparisons which will be equally striking.
Amongst the others, that of Phocena is one of the most interesting.
It will be seen that the post-plexus is pushed backward. But this
may be partially accounted for, as only the first five pairs can be
fairly compared with those of other Mammals, this plexus in Phocena
asa whole, having undergone reduction, the thirty-first to the forty-fifth
pairs forming what ought, perhaps, to be considered a caudal plexus.
Throughout, it will be seen that from the Amphibia onward, the
number of nerve pairs entering into the formation of the plexuses,
have undergone as marked and abrupt a reduction in number, as the
TABLE, SHOWING THE SEGMENTAL DISTRBUTION OF THE NERVE PAIRS FORMING THE PROPLEXUS AND
POSTPLEXUS OF VARIOUS VERTEBRATES.
10 = 20 50 40 50
7 e\5\a\al6\7|a|s|alslelala|5|7lalololr|el5| slalr|alolo|z|els|a|s|al\alolals|elstals|elololol a
359
Marsipobranciih
Branchiostoma
Anguilla x1 xX] xX] ><] x
Cottus scorpio. XIKIX|XIOIOIO
; (Ryder.)
4 Esox lucius. KX] KX] Kx OlO/|O|O|OIOIOIO
(D’Alton.)
= pe eaten XIII HIRI) KK | KT HTK 1K LK | 1 1K 1411 XK [1] X 1X ]x1X1x<] 1K O/O|O|O|O|O
= (Bojanus.)
—& = Phoceena communis X| X] XX} ><) >< O/O|OJO/O/O/OJO|O/O 0 |O|OlO lO |OlO|Ololo
5 (Cunningham.)
“2 Lepus cunriculus. x) xx] < }>< e}\e}(e}le}(e}(e) e}(e) 0)
P (Gray.)
.< Felis domestica. | <]><1 le}(e}ie}(e}lelle)
A (qieart.)
Mustelus canis. * abba bab aba db-ab-ab died babrabrab
( Thacher.)
Crocodilus acutus.
(Hiirbringer.)
Uromastix spinipes. abababed
(Fiirbringer.)
Platydactylus zgypticus. KI x} <]oe] x
(Fiirbringer.)
Pseudopus pallasii.
(Fiirbringer.) x) 1X
~ Cham ameleo > vulgari garis. vivel vinive
1X] XK) KK
1887.]
*
360 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [ 1887.
radii or digits, in the transition from the many-rayed fishes.
This is a very significant fact and is of striking importance, as
indicating that there is a certain general correspondence between
the number of nerve pairs and the number of digits in the hepta-
dactyle, (=what was formerly considered the pentadactyle) limb of
higher vertebrates, since the identification of extra, but vestigiary
radial, ulnar, tibial and fibular digits by Bardeleben. The seven
digits of the manus never much exceed the usual five, to six pairs
of the proplexus, while the seven digits of the pes do not much ex-
ceed or fall below the six to nine nerve pairs of the most usual type
of postplexus. We saw too, that in those cases where an excessive
number of digits were developed in the fore-limb, as in the case of
Raia, there was an exact correspondence in the number of nerve
pairs of the proplexus. The exactitude of this correspondence is in
fact, apparently, in proportion to the degree to which the digital
elements—radii (of the pro- meso- and metapterygium) have retained
their archaic composition, relation, want of torsion, etc., in either
limb,
3. Fusion of radii to form the pro- meso- and metapterygium and
their inexact homology.
On the basis of the doctrines established by Dohrn, through onto-
genetic research, it is quite safe to assume with him, that the three
basal elements of the limb in Elasmobranchs have been derived from
the primitively separate cartilaginous radii, developed in the meso-
blastic tissue between the muscular limb-buds thrown off by the
somites. The different genera of Selachians, however, show that
the pro- meso- and metapterygium, as suspected by Wiedersheim,
are probably not exactly homologous, because the mesopterygium is
not always present, and when present, upon comparing any pair of
genera, it will be found that in no two do the number of radii present
in the pro- meso- and metapterygium correspond. This difference
is apparently due to the fact that the number of radii in the whole
limb, in different genera, is not constant, as already pointed out.
Furthermore, it is evident that the pro- meso- and metapterygium
respectively, cannot be of the same morphological value in different
genera, if the same number of somites do not take a share in the
formation of each of these three parts in different genera. It follows
from this that neither the uniserial nor biserial archipterygium of
Gegenbaur and Huxley can be made to yield such a fixed hypothet-
ical type as will lead up to the various modifications of the paired
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 361
limbs, because it can be shown that what is metapterygium in one
ease is not such in another; besides, there are embryological difficul-
ties in the way which are insuperable. The exact homological
equivalency of pro- meso- and metapterygium, has in fact, been aban-
doned by some of the ablest contemporary anatomists.
4, Formation of plexuses and their inexact homology.
There is no more reason to suppose that the nerve plexuses of
vertebrates are exactly homologous, than there is for the supposition
that the muscles are exactly homologous. The trapezius and latis-
simus dorsi for example, cannot be regarded as having exactly the
same morphological value in Man, Selachians and Amphibians, be- _
cause in these three cases they are not derived from the same num- —
ber of somites; they are only physiologically homologous.
The arguments of Gegenbaur, Fiirbringer and Davidoff that the
limbs have migrated backwards or forwards, as indicated by the ex-
istence of the collector nerves formed by the ansze and commissures
between successive pairs, anterior and posterior to those pairs which
form the functional plexus of the limb, are not sustained by em-
bryological evidence, and the existence of the nervus collector is
rather to be taken as evidence that the radii belonging to the pairs
entering into the anterior and posterior portion of the n. collector
have been suppressed or fused with the radii forming the peduncle
of the limb. My reason for holding this opinion is, that the only
ease in which the effect of translocation of a limb on the peripheral
ends of the nerve pairs passing to that limb, has been traced embry-
ologically, shows that their peripheral ends travel with the displaced
limb, at the same time retaining their origins, and do not run par-
allel for a long distance with the functional pairs, as is shown: by
Davidoff’s own figures of the nerve plexus of Acanthias.
Whatever fibres of the collector nerve enter into the plexus, of the
functional limb, have been incorporated in virtue of the constriction
of the limb fold posteriorly and anteriorly, as a result of which many
radii which were originally attached to the sides of the body, have
acquired a secondary attachment to the proximal ends of the blended
radii, from which the so-called pro- meso- and metapterygium have
been evolved. There can be no doubt of the fact, that in this way
the limbs of primitive vertebrates first became pedunculate. It can
thus be shown that the radii which are detached from the body, are
not lost but simply carried farther out by the accelerated growth of
the radii forming the skeleton of the peduncle of the limb. This
24
362 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
+.
type of displacement of positions of a limb, cannot fairly be com-
pared with the case of the Physoclists, in which the peduncle of the
limb also shifts its position in reference to the origin of its nerve
supply. The foregoing view as to the origin of the n. collector, has,
I would state here, been arrived at independently by Wiedersheim
in the second edition of his Lehrbuch, (p. 323).
It might also be added that, wherever the proplexus and post-
plexus are parts of a continuous series of pairs as in aia, the fin-
folds of both pairs of limbs are also continuous at the time they first
grow out, whereas, when they are not continuous, and when the an-
terior and posterior limbs grow out as more or less widely separated
- folds, but with abortive limb-buds intervening, which never form a
part of the permanent limb, as may be observed in the embryos of
Mustelus, the two plexuses are separated by an interval.
Such forms as Raia, also exhibit extensive fusion of the proximal
ends of the separate radii, leading to the formation of the longest
possible type of pro- and metapterygium, whereas in the types like
Mustelus, the propterygium and metapterygium are composed of fewer
radii. They cannot, therefore, be homologous and we cannot on that
account take any metapterygium or propterygium or whole fin of
any particular type, as the ground form from which an ideal arch-
ipterygium or cheiropterygium may be supposed to have arisen. It
is probably better for the present to assume, for the reason that an
inexact homology exists when the limbs of different vertebrates are
critically compared, that the different types of limbs, as we now see
them in the higher groups, have arisen independently and differently
in the different phyla. That the manus and pes, as seen in the va-
rions vertebrates, from Amphibians upward, show a common plan
there is no doubt, but of the fact that similar structures may orig-
inate independently of each other, we have numerous instances in the
animal kingdom.
It is not even certain that there may not be more than two pairs
of limbs developed in certain Fishes. In the cephalic fins of Torpedo-
and Narcine, the radii rest upon the rostral cartilage of the cranium,
thus separating them from the shoulder girdle. This attachment is
supposed by Gegenbaur to be a secondary one, the radii of the ceph-
alic fins being part of the radii of the propterygium, secondarily de-
detached from the anterior portion of the pectoral. But for this
opinion there do not seem to be more valid grounds, than for the
supposition that the cephalic fins are outgrowths of the head, since
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 363
it is known that in some Dipndi, the pectoral limb is innervated
partly by branches from the hypoglossus and vagus, (Protopterus).
In the domesticated races of the Japanese Gold-fishes, popularly
known as “Fan-tails,’ in which both the anal fin and the ventral
lobe of the caudal fin are frequently double, it has been shown by
Mr. 8. Watase that they arise from a pair of parallel ventral fin-folds
extending from the hinder part of the yolk sack to the end of the
notochord. «*He has further shown in the same memoir* that the
double, ventral series of interhzemals of the anal and caudal of these
fishes are the supports of the radii derived from actinotrichia and
the cartilaginous nodules at their bases, thus bringing these fins into
complete morphological harmony with the ventrals, in which the
pelvic girdle is probably to be considered as representing modified
interhemals. It indubitably follows from this, that the double or
paired anal and the double inferior lobe of the caudal, are to be con-
sidered as paired fins or limbs serially homologous with the pectoral
and pelvic pairs. While this embryological and morphological
evidence most admirably confirms the views of Dohrn as to the na-
ture of the paired limbs, there can be little doubt that, the double
anal and caudal have a just claim to be regarded as additional pairs
of limbs, making four pairs in all. Their development is further to
be regarded as due to reversion induced by a process of degenera-
tion, which has affected the whole urosome or tail of these fishes
from the vent backwards. This degeneration seems to be due to
domestication, since it is now admitted by an expert American
breeder of these varieties of gold-fishes, Mr. W. P. Seal, that the
forms most modified and prized by fanciers can only be reared in
restricted quarters or in aquaria or protected pools of moderate di-
mensions. ‘The extreme shortening and modification of the muscu-
lar and axial parts of the tail, has been produced in the course of a
prolonged process of selective breeding, their singular changes of
form being probably due to disuse. The most modified forms which
the writer has seen alive, were slow and sluggish in their movements,
their enormously lengthened caudal, pectoral and ventral rays and
membranes seeming to interfere with any rapid motions. The short-
ening of the muscular portion of the tail would also aid to produce
such a result, as is known from Strasser’s experimental researches on
the function of the tail in fishes.
*On the caudal and anal fins of Gold-fishes. Journ. Science College, Im-
perial University, Japan. Vol. I.
364 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [ 1887.
The degenerative processes made manifest in ontogeny, often undo
the synthetic or constructive morphological work, which has been
accomplished during phylogeny. This seems to be the case in these
extremely modified forms of Gold-fishes, in which, indeed, there is
palpable evidence of great cranial modification, similar to that seen
in domesticated races of Pigs and in the Japanese Lap-Dogs (Dyso-
dus, Cope), in all of which, as in these fishes, the anterior cranial
and facial bones have been greatly modified.
The preceding explanation seemed necessary in order to empha-
size the doctrine that paired fins might be evolved from the sides of
the tail as supposed by Dohrn and Mayer, by the median fusion of
the ventral fin-folds, which, according to their views, were primor-
dially doubleand lateral. It followsfrom this doctrine, that the nerves
passing to the musculature of the anal and caudal pairs of fins, must
be considered as forming two additional plexuses, neither of which
can by any mode of torturing the facts, be rendered homologous
with those which supply the pectoral or ventral pairs.
ITI. Consequences of the preceding data.
The facts presented above seem to me to lead to the conclusion
that the ichthyopterygium in Fishes is very far from representing
the same or homologous structure; a view which the ontogeny of
the higher vertebrates fully confirms. While the first point has
been admitted by Mivart, Huxley and others, the second has not
received the attention which its importance demands. The fact that
the rudiments of the paired limbs do not normally arise in a homo-
nymous position or at the same points along the axis in Mammals,
Birds, Reptiles, Amphibia, etc., and without any manifest action of
translocation during development, seems to the writer to preclude
the possibility of our assuming that there has existed a common and
exactly homologous, ancestral chiropterygium, from which the limbs
of vertebrates, from Amphibians upward, have been evolved. There
are many difficulties in the way of an answer to this question.
First of all, the universally admitted fact that similar structures may
be developed under similar conditions in widely dissimilar types.
Secondly, the utter want of exact homology when the pro- meso- and
metapterygium are compared. Thirdly, the few unassailable facts
which we possess in regard to undoubted instances of the transloca-
tion of limb rudiments. Fourthly, the origin, by coalescence, of an
indefinite number of radii to form the pro- meso- and metapterygium.
Fifthly, the variations to which this coalescence is subject ; that is,
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 365
posterior radii may be swept forward proximally or anterior ones
may be swept backward proximally; or both processes may occur
simultaneously ; or certain radii may be so accelerated in their growth
and others so retarded as to give rise to a uniserial or biserial pe-
dunculate limb. Sixthly, the evidence as to occurrence of the abor-
tion and extensive loss of radii in any part of the ichthyopterygium
is clear, as well as the frequent dichotomous subdivision of the dis-
tal ends of single radii* as in the pectorals of Raia, and cephalic
fins of Torpedo. Such secondary or divided radii may indeed be
homologous with the digits of higher forms, as it seems might be
countenanced by the fact that the limbs of some Amphibia have but
two digits at first, and that the others afterwards bud out at one
side or edge as was first noted by Prof. Baird, and subsequently con-
firmed by Cope and Baur. Such a view is also tosome degree coun-
tenanced by the manner in which supernumerary digits develop in
Amphibia and by the simple structure and variability of the manus
and pes of Amphiuma or Muraenopsis. Seventhly, the obviously
compound nature of the mesopterygium of Polypterus as is proved
by the presence of serially or segmentally arranged foramina, per-
forating it for the passage of nerves, and which has been supposed
to be shoved outward to give rise to the intermedium, which in
the chiropterygium, must accordingly represent twelve fused radii,
whereas, it ought not at most, represent more than three or four.
Fighthly, the lack of correspondence or agreement in the structure of
the tarsi and carpi of higher forms, some of which are believed to pre-
sent traces of not less than six digits; and in others as many as seven,
and the impossibility of determining with absolute certainty, the
homologues of the tarsal and carpal bones, as the centrale is some-
times represented by two elements or is so obscured as to be too in-
distinct to be clearly made out; the same may be said of the inter-
medium. Ninthly, the impossibility of determining from which bor-
der of the primitive fold the elision or abortion of radii first began,
owing to the fact that the torsion of the fold on its own base, does not
always appear to occur or at least is not recapitulated, this torsion
varies from 90° to nothing at all. Whether the suppression of radii
was metapterygial or propterygial at first, we cannot now determine
with certainty, and all that we can justly say is, that it has probably
occurred on both borders in various types, and to the extent ofa
*The radii of Elasmobranchs as here understood are in no sense the homv-
logues of the rays of Teleosts, which are mainly derived from actinvtrichia.
366 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [ 1887.
variable number of radii in different cases. Tenthly, if the digits of
higher forms represent the distal extremities of one or two dichoto-
mously divided single rays, each derived from a single somite, it is
not possible to state with certainty to which order of secondary
branches they belong, because the epiphyses and diaphyses of the
proximal long bones may represent elements which should be taken
into account. The digits would probably represent the second sub-
division, if the epiphyses of the long bones were thrown out of the
reckoning.
The following suggestion seems very important. The manifest
impossibility of deriving a chiropterygium from a given or known
uniserial or biserial ichthyopterygium, which will serve as a start-
ing point for the limbs of all known higher vertebrates, forcibly im-
presses the conclusion that, firstly, the limbs of all vertebrates are
not necessarily exactly homologous and that, secondly, the chirop-
terygium has in all probability been independently developed sev-
eral times and indirectly from different segments along the sides of
the primitive vertebrate body.
The importance of this conclusion, as qualifying the prevalent
doctrines regarding the homologies of the limbs of vertebrates, may
be inferred since it has been found by Albertina Carlson (Kongl,
Svensk. Vet. Akad. Handl. xi, 1887,) that in the Ophidia the post-
plexus may be developed opposite the intervals between the 275th,
to the 278th, vertebree. Besides this, Miss Carlson has shown that
there is great variation in the position of the postplexus in different
genera of Ophidians.
It seems almost unnecessary to note here, that the modifications of
the position of the limb in reference to the same segments along the
body, also implicates the homologies of the muscles and blood vascu-
lar supply.
The view which has been suggested above as to the origin of the
limbs of the higher vertebrates, implies that the distinction between
the uniserial and biserial archipterygium is simply formal; that
whether a fin shall become provided with series of radii on one or
both sides depends on the manner in which coalescence of the pri-
mary radii took place; whether, in fact, from one or both borders.
The usual type in Elasmobranchs occurred by coalescence from be-
hind. In Raia coalescence occurred from both the anterior and pos-
terior borders of the pectoral as shown by its ontogeny, giving rise
3)
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 367
to a uniserial (anterior) propterygium, and a similar (posterior)
metapterygium.
The cause of such coalescence has been in part, that other adjacent
functionally active parts pressed upon the radii which were growing
at an accelerated rate. The mode in which the radii composing the
fins were functional was also active in promoting coalescence, in fact,
there is no reason to doubt that almost exactly the same arrangement
of forces was potent in inducing the displacement forward of the prox-
imal ends of the posterior radii of the pectoral and pelvic fins, as in
the case of the caudal, as the writer has attempted to show in his
essay on the origin of heterocercy. This is also strikingly shown in
the dorsal and anal fins of some species. The increased pressure or
resistance exerted by the surrounding water on the hinder lower
quarter of the vertical or lateral fins while in action would constantly
tend, owing to the peculiar flexures assumed by the surfaces of the
fins while in motion, to shove the hinder border forwards and carry
the basal ends of the hinder radii forwards. |The method of this
might be shown by means of a diagram, in which the force exerted
by the fin was one side and the resistence of the water the other side
of a parallelogram of forces, while the direction in which the base of
the fin was constantly tending to be displaced, would be determined by
the resultant acting against the hinder lower margin of the fin. The
alternating direction of the stroke of the fin does not impair the
efficiency of this set of active forces, but makes them more efficient,
since, though the action of the forces is alternately reversed as respects
the directions in which they act, the effect is the same.
This hypothesis of the origin of the uniserial fin applies to all its
types, whether encountered in the dorsal finlets of Polypterus or in
the paired fins of Elasmobranchs, Chondrosteans and Chimeeroids.
It also leads up to amore comprehensive theory of the origin of all
the modifications of the fins, as seen in the diverse types of fishes.
As to the chiropterygium, we are warranted in the affirmation
that, whether it has arisen from the dichotomous division of the dis-
tal portion of a separate and single ray, or of two rays, or by the
modification of the distal radii of a uniserial metapterygium, or of
the distal end of a biserial metapterygium, our difficulties are pretty
much the same. And, while the view that those limbs which seem
to show traces of the plan of the chiropterygium, have probably
arisen from some type approximating the metapterygium of some
Elasmobranchs, we must admit that we cannot, for lack of evidence,
368 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
specify the particular type of metapterygium and over what partic-
ular somites it was primarily attached, nor even, indeed, that partic-
ular radii, with terminal dichotomous divisions, may not have been
equally well adapted to furnish the morphological foundation of the
chiropterygium and the endless variety of terminal modifications of
the fore-and-hind-limbs of the higher vertebrates.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 369
PROLONGED LIFE OF INVERTEBRATES: NOTES ON THE AGE AND
HABITS OF THE AMERICAN TARANTULA.
BY HENRY C. MCCOOK, D. D.
Until very lately little has been known concerning the possibilities
of prolonged life among the lower orders of animals. It is well
known that the waste of life is very great in the natural conditions
surrounding most inferior creatures, so that the immense fecundity
of insects and araneads, for example, is abundantly checked. Ihave
counted over eleven hundred eggs and young spiders in the single
egg-cocoon of the Bank Argiope, Argiope riparia, yet one of the
rarest finds for an observer isa very young individual of this common
species. In efforts to breed spiders from the cocoon, I have at various
times seen colonies numbering one hundred or more dispersed from
the maternal egg nest to the surrounding foliage, of which during
the year not a single survivor could be traced.
Bee keepers are well aware of the great mortality among working
bees, caused not only by disease and accidents, but especially by
those enemies which prey upon them. Ants are quite as much, per-
haps even more exposed to loss from accidents, the exigencies of
weather and the appetites of various insectivorous animals. There
is, therefore, abundant occasion for the seemingly exhaustless fertil-
ity of the queen mothers of formicaries. These queens probably
have a longer life than the workers. They are larger in size and
apparently organized for more vigorous resistance of the influences
which work for their destruction. Moreover, the instinct of the
workers has provided a system of preservation by surrounding the
queen with a guard of attendants which never leave her unprotected,
which care for all her wants, and vigilantly separate her by a reg-
ular system of seclusion within the portals of the formicary, from
many influences which would prove hostile to health and fatal to
life.
I. Srr Jonn Luspocr’s AGED ANT QUEEN.
How long an ant queen may live in entirely natural habitat is
unknown, and perhaps cannot be determined. But recently through
the patience and ingenuity of Sir John Lubbock, we have learned
that under artificial protection both workers and queens of certain
species may attain a great age. Nearly six years ago I had the
privilege of visiting this distinguished naturalist at his country seat,
High Elms, Kent, and examining, under his personal direction, his
370 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF | 1887.
artificial formicaries and the mode in which they are preserved. At
that time I saw a queen of the Fuscous ant, Formica fusca, which
was nearly eight years old. During the past summer (1887) I again
visited Sir John at his house in London, and on inquiry after the
aged queen, which I supposed to be still living, was informed that
it had died the day before, having at the time reached the wonder-
ful age of more than thirteen years. I was permitted to see this
venerable queen as she lay in death on the floor of one of the wide
chambers which the workers had excavated in the soil compacted
between glass plates that bounded their formicary. She was still
attended by the circle of “courtiers,” which, according to my pub-
lished observations,’ are in the habit of waiting continually upon
ant queens. Some of these attendants I saw licking the dead queen,
or touching her with their antenne and making other demonstrations
as though soliciting her attention or desiring to wake her out of sleep.
“They do not appear to have discovered that she is really dead,”
remarked Sir John. And so indeed it seemed. It was certainly a
touching sight to witness these faithful attendants surrounding the
dead body of one who had so long presided over the maternal des-
tinies of the colony, and seeking by their caresses to evoke the at-
tention which never again could respond to their solicitations.’
Such experiments as the above clearly indicate that artificial en-
vironment may have a beneficial influence upon insects as well as
domestic animals, and that the interference of human intelligence
may be a preservative factor as well asa destructive one in the
lives of even our most lowly organized fellow creatures.
While awaiting with great interest the details of the life history
of this venerable sovereign of the emmet world, which Sir John
Lubbock will doubtless publish, I venture to note the simple fact of
her prolonged life as an introduction to some facts in the same line
of observation, but relating to a spider.
II. Lone Lire oF A SPIDER.
Karly in the year 1872, I received from Dr. Joseph Leidy a spec-
imen of our common American‘species of the Theraphosoide, first
described and known as Mygale Hentzii, and popularly called the
tarantula. This animal was given to Prof. Leidy by a young friend
and turned over to me with the request that at its death the specimen
1 “Honey and Occident Ants” Chap. iv, p. 41 and Pl. VI, fig. 29.
2 See note at end of paper.
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 371
should be returned to him.’ As the individual seemed to be in good’
health, I preserved its life in order to gain information as to its
habits and vital endurance. It was first placed in a large glass
fish globe on a bed of earth, where it was kept for more than
a year. It was then transferred to a wooden box made with
glazed slides and a sliding glass door at the top, the whole being
eighteen inches long, twelve inches wide and ten high. One
end was filled with dry soil which was slightly compacted and
heaped up; the other end was sparsely covered with earth. There
was thus presented a bit of level space for a water trough, for exer-
cise etc., and full opportunity for the spider to burrow should it be
inclined to its natural tastes. The animal was kept in this box un-
til mid-summer of the present year. I last saw it early in July, just
prior to my departure for England. On June 22nd, 1887, I made
this note: ‘This spider which has been kept ever since 1882 is to-
day in good health. It is on the outside of the earth moundlet in
its box looking hearty after the winter’s fast. It has had nothing
to eat since October last—at least eight months, but has had water
freely. Some flies have been put into it lately, but I do not know
that they have been eaten.” The spider was then left in the care
of my friend, Professor Fronani, who for several summers, while at
work in the Library hall of the Academy, had kindly cared for it
during my absence, giving it water and feeding it with insects, par-
ticularly grass-hoppers, or locusts.
On my return from abroad I was met at the Academy by the in-
telligence that my tarantula was dead. It had descended into the
burrow, which for several years it had maintained close to the side
of the box, about the end of July, and since then had not come up.
Looking into the box I could see against the glass what appeared
to be the fragments of the moulted skin on one side of the cavity,
and on the other side the outlines of the creature’s dead body. Prof.
Leidy, from whom the animal had been received, and after whom I
had named it, (a name being convenient for familiar reference, ) hap-
pened to be in the Library hall at the time I took up the remains
of the spider from its burrow. We found the carcass already partly
decomposed and being preyed upon by dermestid larvae. Close be-
side it were the fragments of its cast skin. It had evidently died
shortly after moulting.
1]t was captured about the beginning of April 1882, at Hill’s Ferry, Stanislaus
Co., California, was kept in a bottle without food for two weeks, then sent to
Prof. G. E. H. Weaver at Media, then a student in Swarthmore College. Mr.
Weaver fed it on beefsteak which it took readily.
372 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
Reckoning its death as having occurred at the close of July 1887,
the spider was five years and three months in my possession. I have
not sufficient data to estimate accurately the rapidity of growth in
this species, but judging from such facts and indications as I have
observed, I do not hesitate to reckon the animal to have been from
eighteen months to two years old when I received it from Dr. Leidy.
At the period of its death, therefore, it must have been at least seven
years old, and may have been eight. It has thus attained the dis-
tinction of having reached the greatest age of any spider known to
science. How long this species and members of the Theraphosoidee
generally live in their natural habitat is of course unknown. I have
no doubt that they live much longer than spiders of the other great
sections or groups, but am inclined to think that it is not usual for
them to reach such on age as my tarantula “Leidy.” In its case,
as in that of Sir John Lubbock’s queen ant, human protection
probably aided to prolong life.
Such observations as have heretofore been made upon the age of
spiders fall in with the general indications as to their vital endur-
ance made by the prolonged age of this tarantula. Blackwall,
the veteran British araneologist, kept spiders of the species Tegenaria
domestica and T. civilis to the age of four years." Moggridge made
a calculation upon the age of trap-door spiders based upon the aver-
age growth in the nests of the young, for he established the fact
which has subsequently been confirmed that the young spider instead
of abandoning its nest enlarges it with its growth. The conclusion
of this calculation was that it took at least four years to produce a
full size trap-door nest, and of consequence the architect must be at
least that old.” The most recent information upon this point is given
by Mr. Fredrick Enock in a paper published two years ago.’
This observer in an extended and interesting communication upon
the habits of the British Atypus speaks of one individual which he
had in his possession over three years, and which, judging from its
size when first captured, he puts at the age of six years. Other
examples which had been under observation for more than two
years were well grown when first transferred to his artificial colony,
1 “Spiders of Great Britian an! Ireland.” p. 8.
2 Moggridge. ‘Harvesting Ants and Trap-door Spiders.” p. 127.
3“The Life-History of Atypus picews, Sulz.”’ Transactions Entomological
Society of London. 1885. p. 416.
: NATU ENCE ILADELPHIA.
1887 ATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILA A 373
and at the date of his paper, June 1885, were still in good health.
He ventures the inference that Atypus is about four years in
reaching maturity, then retains her young for eighteen months
under her care before turning them out to shift for themselves, and
after that lives in vigorous health for a period which he believes
may sometimes reach the advanced age of ten years.
I may add here, as in the same line of research, that Dr. George
H. Horn a distinguished authority in the Coleoptera, has called
my attention to the fact that a female of Cybister roeselit was
preserved for eight years of continuous life by Dr. David Sharp.
As has been stated, my tarantula died in the act of or in conse-
quence of casting its skin. It has usually been accepted as a fact
that the final moult of spiders is made just before the attainment of
maturity. Unfortunately the decayed condition of the carcass does
not permit me to determine the question in the case of this particu-
lar individual. But these interesting queries are suggested: did the
artificial conditions of the spider’s life so influence its organism as
to retard the functions that result in the act of moulting? Are we
therefore to consider this final moult, accomplished at the age of
seven years or thereabouts, to have been abnormal as to the time of
its occurrence? Or, may we infer that this represents the normal
periodicity of moulting and of consequence that the mature spiders
of this family, which are so frequently taken in various parts of the
earth, are all of them as old as the one whose history I have been
noting ?
III. Hasrrs oF THE AMERICAN TARANTULA.
1. Moulting and its dangers.— During its confinement “Leidy” shed
its skin several times. The first moult occurred sometime in August
1882. I had been absent on my usual summer vacation and return-
ing August 31st, saw the animal lying on the soil about the middle
of its glass nest with its feet gathered together looking dull, gray
and faded out—apparently dead. I shook the globe. No response
was made by any action, and as I was at the time in a great hurry,
I left without more careful observation, concluding that the spider
was dead. I was not able to visit it again until the fifth day of
September following. I threw off the cover of the globe and put
my hand in to take out the dead body, which lay apparently in the
same position, in order to preserve it in alcohol. As I touched it
the animal leaped to its feet, and as I hastily withdrew my hand
thankful for the danger which I had escaped, for the creature bears
374 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
a poisonous fang, it presented itself quite changed in appearance.
The body was of a fresh, bright color, the cophal thorax a clean
whitish gray, the head and fangs dark brown. The abdomen was
black with brown hairs covering it. The legs were black with
yellowish brown hairs and spines. I at once understood that the
spider when first seen was in the torpid condition which usually
immediately precedes the act of moulting. In the interval between
my visits it had cast off its skin which I found lying in a tolerably
complete condition on one side of the glass. The spinnerets and
abdomen were entirely unbroken, the spider having evidently
escaped therefrom by pulling its abdomen forward. (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1. Moult of Tarantula showing mode of Escape.
The dorsum of the cephalthorax was attached to the upper part of
the abdomen, and the sternum to the lower part, showing that the
fore part of the skin had cracked around the median line of the
cephalthorax. The feet and legs were attached to the sternum, and
on one side the casts were entirely complete.
The death of this tarantula is another example of a fact which I
have previously observed, that the act of moulting is frequently
attended by dangers of one kind or another to spiders. It is common
to find specimens without one or more limbs, also with distorted and
abbreviated limbs. I have frequently found males lacking several
legs. The theory commonly adopted is that in most of these cases
the loss has resulted from conflicts, perhaps among rival lovers in
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 375
attendance upon the same female. Something of loss may be attri-
buted to this cause, but I am satisfied that in a much larger degree
losses and malformations are due to the accidents of moulting. One
example I may cite, the loss of two limbs experienced by a large
tarantula which I had kept under observation; for during the last
few years I have had a number of these large creatures in artificial
nests. This spider lay upon its back during part and on its side
during the remainder of the time of moulting. The skin was cast
by a succession of movements of the body or parts of the body re-
curring at regular intervals reminding one of labor pains among
mammals. For some reason two of the legs refused to separate
from the skin and after a prolonged struggle they were broken off
at the coxae, and remained within the moult. One foot of another
leg shared the same fate. This moult occurred in the spring; during
the latter aprt of August of the same year the spider again moulted.
The moult was a perfect cast of the animal, the skin, spines, claws
and the most delicate hairs all showing, and their corresponding origi-
nals appeared bright and clean upon the spider. When the cast off
skin was removed the dissevered members were lacking thereon, but
on the spider itself new limbs had appeared, perfect in shape but
smaller than the corresponding ones on the opposite side of the body.
The dissevered foot was also restored. The rudimentary legs had
evidently been folded up within the coxae, and appeared at once
after the moult, rapidly fillmg out in a manner perhaps somewhat
analogous to the expansion of wings in insects after emerging.’
It is possible that my tarantula “Leidy” was too much exhausted
by long previous fasting to endure the severe strain which evidently
is laid upon the organism in the act of moulting, although judging
from the disjecta membra of the skin recovered from the burrow it
had succeeded in casting them all off without any mutilation. The
Spring of 1887 was a backward one, and I experienced great diffi-
culty in procuring insects for food from the immediate neighborhood.
The annual supply of grass-hoppers and locusts upon which J had
relied came very late. Perhaps had the spider been strengthened
by a few week’s generous feeding previous to its last moult, it might
still have been alive.
2. How to keep spiders alive—tI may say here that my experience
in keeping other large spiders is that there is quite as much danger
from over—feeding as under—feeding. I have found the best success
1 See Proceedings Academy of Natural Sciences Philadelphia, 1883. p. 196.
376 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF (1887.
by giving a generous supply of living food during the summer and
early autumn, and withholding food almost entirely during the
remainder of the year. I was particular, however, to keep a vessel
continually supplied with fresh water within the box. Spiders
require water quite as much as other animals, and failure to keep
them supplied will be fatal to health and life. I have sometimes
succeeded in tempting a tarantula to suck the juice of a bit of raw
beef, but the only food that can be relied upon is living insects; and
the spiders appear to be able to lay up within the four or five months
of summer enough nourishment, in connection with a free supply of
water, to last them during the entire year. They do not become
torpid in the winter time, it should be said, but remain active
throughout the entire season, provided they are kept in a room
heated to a moderate temperature. If exposed to severe cold they
are soon benumbed, but quickly recover when again brought into a
warm atmosphere.
When the spider was disposed to feed, an insect was seized with
the fore legs, palps and mandibles, which rapidly conveyed it to the
mouth against which it was held by the palps which also turned the
carcass as the spider had occasion, aided by the mandibles, the
latter crushing the victim meanwhile. (Fig. 2). On one occasion
‘! cae i ali a2 3
a Raa pasa ee SARA NE ee MP : '
. 2. Tarantula feeding upon-a locust.—The white Silken rug shown.
Saar wee
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. ot7
while in the act of feeding upon a locust a second individual
approcached near enough to be seized It was put upon the ground
where it was held down until the spider, moving slowly around,
overspun and swathed it, evidently reserving it for future use.
3. Spinning and Spinning work.—The central space of the little
mound in the box was usually kept covered with a white sheeted
web, suggesting the idea of a rug, upon which the creature loved to
rest. If this were removed or covered over with dirt it was restored
by the spider in a little while. In the act of spinning, the long
inferior spinnerets were curved upward, and from the spinning tubes
along the exterior part gave out numerous fine threads. These were
attached to the ground by the downward motion of the spinnerets.
The abdomen was lifted up, the threads were thus drawn out, the
downward motion repeated, and simultaneously the end of the
abdomen with the spinnerets attached received a lateral motion
which caused the threads to be spread over the surface of the
ground. At the same time the animal slowly moved its whole body
around as upon a pivot, thus dispersing the silk over a circular
patch of the surface, about equal in diameter to twice the length of
its body, or to the spread of its legs. (See Fig. 2). At times a
web much more open in texture would be found spread more or
less freely over nearly the whole surface of the soil.
Tt has been said that when the white central rug became soiled
by dirt or food debris it was soon over spread with a clean layer.
In course of time the top of the mound in “Leidy’s” box became
thus covered with a thick mass of intermingled silk and clay which
I easily removed and have preserved intact. The piece represents
nearly the compass of the central rug, and is a curious compound of
intermingled soil and silk. It is a fact that the remarkable hinged
door which the trap-door spider attaches to her burrow is made up
of alternate layers of silk and soil. If one were inclined to specu-
lation, or to a “scientific use of the imagination,” he might raise the
inquiry: may not the the trap-doors spiders have found in some
such accidentally formed texture the original suggestion of her mud-
and-silk door? On the other hand, one might also wonder why the
tarantula and, in fact, other spiders with equal facilities of like
nature have not developed some trace of the same habit?
Two locusts were once placed in the box at a part where the
threads were numerous, one of which was soon entangled in the
spinning work and began to struggle for freedom. Tarantula was
25
378 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
on the mound about ten inches distant and moved slowly towards
the insect, creeping, crouching, evidently directed by the agitated
web. It was very tardy in its approach and my attention was
unavoidably diverted, but shortly afterward I saw the spider
devouring the locust. The question was raised, does the tarantula
in natural site take its prey in this way, by lines spread before its
den or elsewhere upon the surface of the ground? Mr. Bates
appears to have the opinion that the web of the large Brazilian
tarantula is used to capture prey; at least, he speaks of birds
entangled therein and fed upon by the spider.’
The thick texture of the sheeted web is produced by the act of
beating downward with the long spinnerets, repeated motions of
which up and down make little loops which thicken over the surface
and are beaten down and then smoothed over by the spinnerets.
(Fig. 3.) The action does not greatly differ from that of all other
Fig. 8. Spinning the rug; use of the long spinnerets.
spiders while engaged upon similar spinning work. In the act of
spinning, tarantula frequently reaches one hind claw to the spin-
nerets and makes a series of rapid strokes, then stretches out the
foot as though carrying the thread with it. It would appear to be
intended thus to draw out the silk from the spinning tubes, but the
motion was so rapid that I never could exactly make out its full
purpose or determine whether it might not be a mode of clearing
1 The Naturalist on the Amazon, il, p. 58.
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 379
out or rearranging the spinning tubes and surrounding spines; in
other words, the adjustment of the spinning machinery.
4.. Character of the Nest and mode of burrowing—The opinion
prevails largely that the tarantula, Mygale Hentzii, makes a trap-
door nest, and it has not been an uncommon thing for me to meet
tourists who had purchased in California specimens of trap-door
nests, and at the same time a specimen of the large tarantula which
the sellers claimed had made it."
I am satisfied by my long continued observations of these crea-
tures in confinement, as well as by authentic reports from various
persons, that they make no trap-door, and that their only nest is a
burrow in the ground. Dr. J. Rowland, of Media, Pa., who has
several times visited Los Angelos, informs me that the tarantula is
there found in holes covered with a slight web. A little mound of
fresh earth is thrown up around the surface edge of the hole which
is merely covered over by a delicate web. There is no trap-door
to this den, which is a burrow about an inch and a quarter in diam-
eter extending downward from ten to twenty inches in depth. The
boys bring the spiders up by pouring water down the holes. The
great creatures burst out of the open gate, spread their long legs and
hurry away, and are then easily captured. According to Mr. G.
W. Holstein who has frequently observed them in Texas they live
in holes about one and an eighth inch in diameter which appear to
have a white silky lining and are generally found in sandy soil.
One burrow dug up by his brother was ten inches deep; was desti-
tute of a lining, but at the bottom there appeared some sort of a
nest. When disturbed the creatures run into holes formed by the
weathering out of fossils &c. At Los Angelos the animals are
found at times occupying gopher holes.
1 Professor Spencer F. Baird, the late distinguished and lamented Secretary of
the Smithsonian Institution, entertained this opinion, and when I once questioned
i, thought he had specimens in the museum at Washington that would prove it.
He subsequently wrote me: “I did not find in any of the California nests any
remains of spiders at all but we have two from Jamaica which still have large
hairy spiders in them. ‘These nests are much more slender than those from Cali-
foinia. I shall be pleased to show them to you whenever you visit Washington,
I cannot send them as they are too fragile for transmission.” I have not yet had
the opportunity of examining these specimens, but think that they will be found to
belong to the genus Memesza or Cteniza, and are not true tarantulas.
380 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [ 1887.
Mr. Bates describes spiders of this family (Mygale Blondii and M.
avicularia) as inhabiting broad tubular galleries smoothly lined
with silken webs. The galleries are two inches in diameter and
run in a slanting direction about two feet.' Again he speaks
of them as spreading a thick web beneath a deep crevice in trees,
and having their cells under stones.” Once more in alluding to
their diversified habits he says that some species construct among
the tiles or thatch of houses dens of closely woven web which in
texture very much resembles fine muslin. From these domiciles
they invade the house apartments. Others, according to Mr. Bates
build similar nests in trees.* I believe that it will be found that
the creatures that burrow in the earth are identical with those
which spread sheeted webs among the trees. Numbers of tarantulas
come to our port (Philadelphia) in fruit vessels, and are often found
in the great pendants of bananas, to which they had no doubt
resorted as a convenient field for capturing prey, and were them-
selves captured and shipped hidden away among the clusters of
fruit.
In the case of the spider ‘“Leidy” the only effort made at nest
building was a rude burrow which was excavated against one side
of the box and which in the course of time was extended downward
to the bottom of the box and laterally along the bottom either way,
thus forming an irregular cavity. Into this it frequently, descended,
dividing its time between the cave and the outside surface. This
burrow was entirely destitute of a silken lining, although occasion-
ally the opening at the surface would be overspun with a thin sheet
of spinning work. I have seen the same habit in other individuals
of the species kept in confinement. The only attempt at a nest ever
observed by me has been this burrow, with an occasional sheeted
closure, and rarely a slight silken lining of the interior of the burrow,
I believe, therefore, that the popular theory that the tarantula makes
a trap-door is without foundation in fact, and that its ordinary hab-
itat is a plain burrow like that made by most Lycosids.
The mode of making the burrow was well observed by me at va-
rious times. In the act of digging, the spider first uses the two leg-
like palps, the digital brushes of which are well adapted for that
1 Bates **The Naturalist on the Amazon” Vol. ii, p. 58.
Zid. Vol. i; p. 161
Side Vola ie peOb:
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 381
service. Then the two front feet are brought into play to gather up
the loose pellets of soil and scrape them into a ball. The first and
Fig. 4. Tarantula digging up and gathering a ball of earth to carry away.
second pairs of legs now close up around and under the balled mass,
thus compressing it inside the mandibles. (Fig. 4.) When the
pellets have thus been gathered and squeezed into a mass, they are held
within the extended mandibles, the palps in the meantime girdling
them at the sideand
, beneath, and so are
carried away from
the burrow to the
dumping ground.
(Fig. 5.)
I never observed
any scratching and
scraping the dirt
Fig. 5. Mode of carrying excavated soil. backward in the
fashion of a dog digging in a rabbit burrow, which is also the action
of ants, bees and wasps when excavating the earth. Always the
pellets were deliberately loosened as I have indicated, squeezed to-
gether into a ball and carried off. During the act of digging, and
indeed quite habitually during all actions such as eating etc., the
382 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
spider kept her spinnerets curved over the end of the abdomen with
a diverging ray of threads issuing therefrom and attached to the
surface beneath.
5. Toilet Habits—After digging, the palps were used to wipe off
the fore parts of the body, very much as a cat uses her paw for a
like purpose. The fore legs were placed against the palps and were
cleansed by rubbing the two together. The toilet was also accom-
plished by overlapping one leg with the other, the second leg over
the third, for example, and then rubbing the two as if a man were
to scratch his leg by drawing the inner surface of one along the front
surface of the other. The first leg was thus rubbed against the sec-
ond, of course being pressed down upon it meanwhile. The palp
too was thrown back to the first lez which it brushed off in the same
manner. After digging in its burrow, “Leidy” was always quite
sure to cleanse its person, and by reason of its size the use of its
palps in wiping off the fore part of its body presented a most amus-
ing likeness to the familiar action of pussy when washing off her
face with her paws.
6. The character of the egg cocoon.—A large female tarantula was
sent to me from the West Indies, and arrived at the Academy during
a prolonged absence. She died before my return and was preserved
Lia ees. A <.
Fig. 6. Cocoon and eggs of Tarantula.
in spirits; but afforded me an opportunity, which I had long desired,
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 383
of determining the egg cocoon made by this family, the Therapho-
soide. While cleaning out the box in which she had been sent I
observed a piece of spinning work within, which proved to be an
abandoned cocoon. It was much flattened, but when inflated
showed a hollow spheroid composed of thick silken cloth, somewhat
soiled on the outside, but within clean and white. It measured two
inches along the longer axis and 14 inch along the shorter one. It
was empty of young, whose first moults, however, were within the
cocoon, as were also a few unhatched eggs which are yellowish
spheres, two millimeters in diameter. Three small openings in
the case showed where the spiderlings had escaped. Both cocoon
and eges are shown natural size in the accompanying figure.
(Fig. 6).
The interior of this cocoon was without any flossy lining or
padding, resembling thus the egg sacs of the Lycosoide generally.
A curious flap overlapped the cocoon at one side, whose use I could
not conjecture, unless it may have served to attach the object to the
mother’s body; or, perhaps, it was simply a remnant of material
which had remained after the eggs were rolled up within the silken
rug upon which they are probably deposited after the manner which
I have shown to exist in the genus [ycosa.'
The janitor who received the box containing this spider and
placed it in my room was at the time new in his position and did
not understand the importance of observing all the particulars in
the habits of living creatures sent to the Academy. He therefore
failed to make any notes, but told me when questioned that he
believed that the cocoon was attached to the lower part of the body
of the spider whenit arrived. No doubt this isa correct observation,
and we may assume with some degree of certainty that the large
ege sac of the Theraphosids is carried by the mother lashed to the
spinnerets at the apex of the abdomen, precisely as in the case of
Lycosids, whose well known habit is familiar to every frequenter of
our fields.
This cocoon is exhibited in my collection of Aranead architecture
deposited in the Academy, and is the only one, so far as I have been
able to learn, exhibited in any similar institution. Termeyer speaks
of cocoons of the Mygalide of South America (“Aranea aviculariw’)
even greater than the above. They are three inches long by one
1 See Proceedings Academy Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1884. Page
138, my nete on “How Lycosa Fabricates Her Round Cocoon’’.
384 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [ 1887.
wide, and are placed in the fissures on the trunks of trees. They
contain thousands of eggs. This extraordinary size of the cocoon
had made the inhabitants who do not observe carefully, imagine
that this spider would take the cocoon of ‘the bombice moth, del
Guyavo (Janus, Linn.)” and having destroyed or eaten the chrysalis
would place her own eggs therein, and then artificially close the
hole by which she had penetrated it. One of these cocoons weighs
as much as six cocoons of the silk worm when they are washed, and
as much as three or four after having been washed.’
Madam Merian, who first recorded a report that the Theraphosoidee
prey upon small birds, must have observed the cocoon of these
spiders, as it seems to me. She indeed speaks of them as having
their domicile in a large round nest resembling the cocoon of a
caterpillar, but the plate to which she refers is a fairly accurate
figure of a female tarantula with a large oval cocoon attached to
her abdomen in the way usual to Lycosids.” I have the opinion that
the egg cocoon of the spider was mistaken by Madamoiselle Merian
or her informants for a “domicile.” At all events we may consider
that it is fairly well assured that, in her cocooning habits, the female
tarantula throughout most or perhaps all species, closely resembles
the Lycosoide, and the resemblance probably extends to all the
Territelariz. In other words, the Theraphosid cocoon is (1)
round or ovoid, (2) is carried about with the mother, attached to
her body, or kept under her care, and (3) the young for a period
longer or shorter remain with their mother. The affinity between
these two great groups of araneads is also marked in their nesting
habits; both burrow in the ground a cylindrical tunnel or shaft
within which they domicile, sometimes lining it more or less com-
pletely with silk.’
7. Attitude at rest and in attack—While resting upon its silken
rug a favorite position of the tarantula was as follows: On one side
the first leg and the last leg were well extended, the feet were lifted
a little distance above the ground. The second and third feet were
1 Communications Essex Institute, Vol. v., 1866—67, p.61. ‘Researches and
Experiments upon silk from Spiders and upon their reproductions, by Raymond
Maria de Termeyer.’’ Translated from the Italian, and revised by Burt G.
Wilder.
* Desertation sur la Generation et les Transformations des insects de Surinam.
Mariae Sibillae Merian. Ala Haye, mdocxxvi.; Fig. 18 and explication.
3] purpose tracing this resemblance more in detail ina subsequent paper on
“Nesting Habits of the American Purseweb Spider, Atypus niger.”’
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 385
placed upon the ground. On the opposite side, the legs rested upon
the surface. One of the palps was lifted up; the other touched the
earth. Sometimes when slightly alarmed or its attention was
attracted by any noise or agitation, all the fore feet, the two pairs
on each side, as well as the palps, would be raised from the ground
and slightly thrown back. If the alarm or excitement increased
the whole fore part of the body would gradually be raised, the legs
‘and palps thrown backward in a curved position, and the mandibles
also bent back, slightly separated and ready for striking. In this
rampant attitude the body rested upon the two hind pairs of legs
which were rather extended, and on the third pair which were
slightly bent and pressed firmly against the soil. As they were
more or less stiffened and straightened the body would be thrown
backward or depressed. This was the position invariably taken by
the tarantula when angry, and from this position it would spring
forward and strike any object which excited its wrath, or which it
wished to destroy.
Having struck out, which was done by bringing down palps, fore
paws and fangs together upon the victim, the creature sank back
into its rampant position. If so inclined it could rapidly repeat
this movement. The whole attitude was an admirable expression
of anger and readiness to strike for defence or offence. In the fine
muscular exhiliration imparted by the creature’s passion, the limbs
assumed such graceful curves, and the pose of the body showed so
happy a combination of vigor and ease, that the formidable spider
really looked beautiful. It could stand in this rampant attitude
with motionless rigidity for many minutes.
Among these notes of the general habits of the tarantula I may
place the following, also communicated to me by Mr. Holstein.
His observation of the tarantulas in Texas convinces him that they
are very irritable. They will jump at least ten inches if they are
excited thereto by sticks, although they are otherwise not inclined
to be troublesome. He has known them to jump almost as high as
his horse’s knee. In the sandy country along the Colorado River
in Texas they are very numerous, and one became so enraged one
day as to run up the horse of one of the company as far as the
shoulder before it was knocked off. Some Texans say that it is an
infallible sign of rain to see these creatures crawling about freely.
I have myself captured them in Texas without difficulty, but
was never able to find anything satisfactory as to their field habits
386 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [ 1887.
except the fear which they show when the famous wasp popularly
called “the tarantula killer,’ Pompilus formosus, happens to be in
the neighborhood. The excited haste with which the huge spider
hurries off into hiding, when one of these formidable hymenopters
is near is a very striking sight."
1 The following note was received from the author of the above paper just as
the printed pages were going to press, and work thereon has been stopped in order _
to admit the explanation.—The Editor.
Dr. Epwarp J. NoLAN,
Dear Sir :—
I have this morning received a note from Sir John Lubbock dated
January 6th, in which he says “My old ant queen is still alive, but
I fear a little stiff”
I am not able to explain the discrepancy between this statement
and the account given of the apparent death of the same insect in
my paper (page 370). It is evident, however, that both Sir John
and myself were deceived by what must have been a transient sus-
pension of activity. I saw the ant, and carefully observed it for five
minutes or more, and am confident that it had the undoubted
appearance of death. .Sir John must have been laboring under the
same mistake for at least a day.
I have no explanation of the phenomenon which thus deceived
one of the most careful observers of emmet habits in England, to say
nothing of myself. I await anxiously the explanation, for which I
have written, of this apparent “resurrection,” but in the meantime
am desirous that some statement shall be got into or attached to my
paper, to modify in accordance with present facts what I therein
say.
If the work has not too far progressed to allow this, will you
please see that this note or the substance thereof, is inserted at the
end of the paper.
Very truly yours,
Henry C. McCook.
1887. | NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 387
DESCRIPTION OF TWO NEW SPECIES OF FISHES FROM
SOUTH AMERICA.
BY DAVID STARR JORDAN.
Cristiceps eigenmanni, sp. nov.
Head 4 in length to base of caudal; depth 4. D. III-X XIX, 2:
A. 27 or 28. Scales in lateral line about 80. Type No. 12556
D.C: Z,
Body rather stout, compressed. Eye nearly twice as long as the
sharp snout. Maxillary reaching to about opposite front of pupil.
Tentacle on top of head small, shorter than pupil. Hook on shoul-
der-girdle obsolete, the structure as in Labrosomus. First dorsal
rather low, scarcely joined to second ; soft dorsal of two very evident
soft rays. Scales very small. Pectoral a little shorter than head.
Color (in spirits) brown, much mottled, some dark cross-bars espe-
cially distinct on dorsal and anal; five of these on second dorsal,
one on first dorsal, one on base of caudal, six on anal. Caudal and
pectorals pale, finely barred. No dark ocellus on dorsal or anal.
The type of this species, 23 inches in length, was dredged by the
Hassler, off Bermeja Head in Northeastern Patagonia (Lat. 41°
17m. S: Long. 63° W). It is in good condition, and it is numbered
12556 on the register of the Museum of Comparative Zoology. I
have named the species for my former assistant, Mr. Carl H. EHigen-
mann, who has contributed a good deal to our knowledge of the
fishes of tropical America.
The species resembles Auchenopterus (Cremnobates) marmoratus,
but the seales are much smaller than in Auchenopterus.
Mycteroperca xenarcha. sp. nov.
Head 27 in length to base of caudal; depth 3. D. XI.16. A.
IIT, 11. Scales 110 to 115. Length of specimen especially de-
scribed (24198, Museum of Comparative Zodlogy, from James Island,
Galapagos) seven inches.
Allied to Mycteroperca bonaci and Mycteroperca faleata.
Body rather deep and compressed ; head compressed, with rather
short, sharp snout, which is 43 in head; profile depressed above eye.
Mouth large, the maxillary reaching beyond eye, 27’c in head. Low-
er canines small; upper canines (two in number) strong, scarcely
directed forward. Eye small, 63 in head. Preorbital narrow, #
width of eye. Interorbital area flattish, its width 6 in head. Nos-
388 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
trils small, the posterior scarcely the larger, separated from the an-
terior by one diameter, Angle of preopercle scarcely salient, but
provided with coarser teeth; a rather sharp notch above it. Gill
rakers moderate. X+18. Scales moderate, scarcely ctenoid.
Dorsal spines low, the outline of the spinous dorsal gently con-
vex, the fourth spine longest, 3 in head. Soft dorsal high, its out-
line angular, the tenth ray produced, 3% in head. Anal fin formed
asin M. falcata, its seventh ray produced, 2 in head, its posterior
outline concave. Caudal subtruncate, the outer rays slightly pro-
duced. Pectoral 1% in head.
Color in spirits plain dark olivaceous, the edges of the fins scarcely
darker. |
Several specimens of this species from the Galapagos Islands are
in the Museum of Comparative Zodlogy. These were mixed with
specimens of the more common Mycteroperca olfax, from the same
locality. Other specimens (10061 M. C. Z.) are from Payta, Peru.
Mycteroperca xenarcha resembles M. olfax in form and color. In
M. olfax however, the nostrils are close together, the posterior some
three times the diameter of the anterior: the second and third dor-
sal spines are elevated, about half higher than the fourth. Both
species have the angular anal fin as in M. falcata, a character also
shown in less degree by M. acutirostris and M. tigris.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 389
NOTE ON ACHIRUS LORENTZI.
BY DAVID STARR JORDAN.
In the review of the Pleuronectidz of America and Europe, pub-
lished by Jordan and Goss in the Report of the U. S. Fish Commis-
sion for the current year, mention is made of a species of Sole from
Uruguay, described by Dr. Weyenbergh under the name of Achirus
lorentzi. This description was at that time not accessible to us.
Through the kindness of Sefior Augustin Pendola, Secretary of the
National Museum of Buenos Ayres, a copy has been recently sent
to me. As the paper is very difficult of access, I have thought it
well to reprint the description in these Proceedings.
Achirus Lorentzii, Weyenbergh. (Actas de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias
Exactas, Buenos Aires, Tom. III. Entr. I. p. 13.)
“Achirus lorentzii, Weyenbergh.
“Esta nueva especie de la familia des los Pleuronectoideos, tiene
alguna semejanza con la especie figurada en el “Atlas” del viaje de
D’Orbigny, con el nombre de Achirus lineatus Lac.; pero las difer-
encias, sin embargo, son bastante grandes.
“Ta aleta dorsal no se extiende en al Achirus Lorentzti, como
sucede en al A. lineatus, hasta el labio superior de la boca, 6 hasta
la nariz, sino Gnicamente hasta la altura del fin de la fisura agallar ;
su forma tambien es diferente. En A. lineatus esta aleta se aumente
poco 4 poco, de manera que la parte posterior tiene, mds 6 menos,
el doble de la parte anterior, formando uno linea regularmente en-
corvada. En A. Lorentzii, la parte posterior es igual 4 la anterior
enanchandose ambas regularmente hasta tomar la parte mds ancha,
una forma aguda, hacia al medio, y como dirigiéndose los rayos todos
deste punto. El ntiimero de estos es 40. En A. lineatus la aleta
anal se extiende hasta la fisura agallar, y presenta la misma forma
regularmente corvada. En A. Lorentzii la forma de la aleta anal
es la misma que la de la aleta dorsal; su parte aguda y mas larga se
encuentra un poquito mas 4 la cola, y esta aleta contintia solamente
hasta dos cent. distante de la fisura agallar. El] ntimero de sus rayos
es 38. El color de la superficie derecha es como el de A. lineatus
de manera que puede llamarse muy bien color sepia oscura. Las
manchas negras son ménos grandes y ménos oscuras que en A. lin-
eatus, y las escamas un poco mas grandes. El color del lado ciego
es blanco, lo que acontece casi siempre en esta familia. Una otra
diferencia notable es que A. Lorentz tiene aletas ventrales rudiment-
390 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
arias y pequefias, pero bastante distintas, de lo cual no se nota nada
en la fig. de A. lineatus de D’Orbigny. Los pelos de la barba son
ménos desarrollados en nuestro especie, y le faltan los apéndices en
el labio superior, que se ven en la mencionada figura de A. lineatus.
La boca es encorvada mas rectangularmente en nuestra especie, y
los ojos son mds pequefios y mas esféricos, encontrandose el ojo in-
ferior que es mas chico, perfectamente en el angulo de la corvadura
locale.
“Las lineas transversales, que han dada origen al nombre de A.
lineatus se encuentran tambicn en nuestro especie, pero son mucho
ménos anchas, y 4 pesar de que el numero siempre parece el misura,
no hay una regularidad muy constante 6 tipica en la distribucion de
estas lineas in en sus corvaduras.
“La linea lateral es mas gruesa y mas recta en A. Lorentzit que
en A. lineatus, y en ésta dicha linea se encorva mucho mas, por la
parte de arriba, y hacia la cabeza, que en nuestra especie.
“Los extremos purptireos que se ven en la parta superior de las
aletas dorsales y anales de A. lineatus. y en su aleta caudal, no se
encuentran en A. Lorentzti, en éste tales partes son solamente un
poco mas claras que lo demas de las aletas. Kl nimero de rayos en
la aleta caudal es 19. En la membrana de las aletas se ven ambas
especias los mismas pequefias manchas negras.
“El tamafio mayor que conozco, de mi especie, es de dos decimetros
de largo, desde la barba hasta la extremidad de la cola: 14 centi-
metros de ancho entre las dos extremidades agudas de la parte mas
ancha de las aletas dorsal y anal.
“Parte mas gruesa del cuerpo, 18 milimetros.
“He encontrado este pescado en las aguas, al rededor de Santa Fé,
pero enel Parand mismo. Tambien lo he recibido del Uruguay.
“Me parece que ésta es la primera especie, de la interesante familia
de los Pleuronectoideos, que ha sido encontrada en agua dulce, pues
todas las que conocemos hasta ahora, viven en el mar, 6 en gulfos y
bocas que estén en comunicacion directa con el mar; es decir, en
agua salada 6 salobre,. He dedicado esta especie al sabio botanico
y célebre viajero alemen, Profesor Dr. D. P. G. Lorentz, antes mi
colega en esta Universidad, por haber sido él el primero que fijé6 mi
atencion sobre la existencia de esta especie en nuestro pais.”
This species seems to be a valid one—apparently allied to Achirus
lineatus but distinguished, if Dr. Weyenbergh has counted correctly,
by the small number of the fin rays. (D. 40, A. 38.)
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 391
Dr. Giinther has identified it with Achirus mentalis, a species with
D. 66, A. 48, but has given no reason for so doing.
Supplementary note.—In our Review of the Pleuronectide, we overlooked
Achirus fischeri (Solea fischert, Steindachner, Beitrage zur Kenntniss der Flusz-
fische Sud-Amerkas, 1879, 13.), from Rio Mamone, a tributary of the Rio Bayano,
near Panama. This seems to be “a valid species allied to Achirus fonsecensis,
but with D. 61, A. 44, and the right pectoral of only a single ray.
In this connection, I may notice that the species called “ P/agusza’”’ of which the
development has been traced by Prof. Alexander Agassiz, (Proc. Am. Acad. Arts
Sci. 1878, XIV, Pl. 10, f. 171.) is not a ““Plagusia” (i. e. Symphurus), nor is ita
Sole at all, but the young of some Platophyrs, apparently P2. ocel/atus. Thus far,
nothing is certainly known of the development of the Soles.
392 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
DECEMBER 6.
Mr. THomas Mrrnan, Vice-President, in the chair.
Twenty-six persons present.
The death of Evan Randolph, a member, was announced.
The origin of the Grassy Prairies—Mr. Meehan said that in 1871
he had offered to the Academy some facts to show that the views of
the origin of the prairies, at that time generally accepted, could not
be sound, and he then suggested some points that must have had
considerable influence in bringing about this tree-less condition.
Among these points, he had named the annual prairie fires of the
Indians. Given a sheet of grass to be annually burned over, and
forests flanking it, trees, obviously, could not extend far. Young
sprouts from a tree stump would not flower. It took aseedling tree
or sprouts from a stump to persist in growth for a number of years
before its flowering stage is reached. Hence, though trees should
‘spring up on a grassy prairie, the annual burning to the ground pre-
venting the sprouts from reaching maturity, would be an insuper-
able bar to the surrounding forests encroaching far on the area of
the prairie.
A further consideration, since that time, made it evident, that
tree seeds could scarcely get a chance to grow at all in these grassy
places. He had studied the so-called “balds” or open grassy places
on mountain tops and sides, surrounded on all sides by forests, where
there had been no annual fires, and yet no trees. He referred par-
ticularly to such spots on Roan Mountain, North Carolina. There
would be open spaces covered by a thick matted sod, the chief grass
composing it being Danthonia compressa. Spruce, Fir, Oak, and
representatives of other genera surrounded them on all sides.
Though the trees may have been fifty or even a hundred years old, the
grassy outline had evidently been definitely fixed years back, and
had not since been encroached upon until these later times. Since
cattle had been permitted to browse, young trees could be seen here
and there springing up. If the browsing continued, trees would
eventually cover the balds. In the past, seeds falling on the thick
matted grass, could not grow. There would be too much light and
too little moisture, so far from the ground. Should a seed sprout
under such circumstances, the radicle would dry up before it pushed
through the thick mass of grass to the necessary earth. Browsing
cattle kept down the grass, and gave the seeds a chance to reach
the ground, and their hoofs would often make the ground bare, and
even tread the seeds beneath the surface. Though eaten to the
ground, the trees would sprout again,—some get stronger and larger,—
and some eventually get to be trees, finally shading and killing out
the light-loving grass. While annual fires certainly prevented trees
spreading over grassy areas, we could now account for their non-ex-
istence, even as young seedling plants.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 393
Our own prairies afforded evidence of the soundness of these views.
There would often be seen elevated peninsular-like arms stretching
from the woody area into the grassy basins, or even little islands of
elevated ground in the midst of the flat sea of soddy land, covered by
trees of various kinds. These elevations by reason of drouth, lighter
soil, or other special conditions, were unfavorable for the growth of
the thick mass of herbaceous vegetation that possessed the land be-
low. ‘The seeds could not only sprout and become trees, but the ab-
sence of much grassy undergrowth saved them from serious effects
from fire on lower prairie ground.
There could be no doubt these considerations fully accounted for
the perpetuity of the grassy areas, and the inability of the forests to
encroach thereon.
If we are now asked how these extensive areas were given over to
grass in the first place, we may safely reply that the trees were not
there to dispute with it for the possession of the ground, or they
would have conquered. We may imagine the prairie region as in a
state of transition from the paludose to the limose state, with ligneous
or arborescent vegetation on the higher lands, many miles away.
The tufty grasses would undoubtedly take possession long before their
woody neighbors could come down from the hills and spy out the
land. The struggle for life would be at the boundaries where the
two forces met. The trees could not gain rapid advances, but by
the overshadowing of their branches would weaken the grass be-
neath, and thus, by slow approaches, gradually conquer their
weaker neighbors. In meadows, where cattle kept the coarse grass
down, or where briars or light bushes kept tough grass from spread-
ing, or where the ground was too gravelly or sandy or the native
grasses not of a close tufty character, trees found no obstruction
whatever in their endeavor to take possession of the soil.
DECEMBER 13.
The President, Dr. Jos. Lerpy, in the chair.
Twenty-three persons present.
Bot-larvae in the Terrapin—Prof. Letpy remarked that the
habits of a naturalist often led him to observe things in our daily
life which usually escape the notice of others. In our food he had
frequent occasion to detect parasites which he preferred to reject
but which are unconsciously swallowed by others. While he liked
a herring, he never ate one without first removing the conspic
uously coiled worms on the surface of the rows; and he had
repeatedly extracted from a piece of black bass or a shad a thread
worm which others would not distinguish from a vessel or a
nerve. While he did not object to the little parasitic crab of the
oyster, he made it a point to remove the equally frequent leech from
the clam. It was in a piece of ham, he was eating, that he first:
394 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
noticed the trichina, which was no doubt one of the causes that led
Moses to declare the pig to be unclean; and in the hundred tape-
worms he had examined, from our fellow citizens, during the past
twenty five years, he had ascertained that they had all been derived
from rare beef. He continued, in a visit to Charleston, 8. C. before
the late war, at an evening entertainment among other viands,
were nicely browned slices of the drum-fish, Pogonias chromis.
A friend informed him that some portions were more gelatinous
and delicate than others and helped him to what was supposed to be
one of such. On cutting into it he had observed imbedded in the
flesh a soft mass which appeared of enigmatic character. The
following day he procured from market a drum-fish on the dissection
of which, he found imbedded in the tail several egg-shaped masses,
about three inches long and less than an inch thick, which proved
to be a large coiled worm, (Acanthorhynchus reptans).’ This it was
that gave delicacy to the dainty, and in this instance the parasite
seems to enhance the excellence of the food. At another evening
entertainment nearer home he partook of some stewed terrapins.
Taking into his mouth what appeared to be an egg it produced such
an impression as led to its rejection. Seeming so peculiar he tied it
in the corner of his handkerchief for more convenient examination.
The specimen, now exhibited, was a membranous bag which con-
tained thirty yellowish white maggots from 8 to 12 mm long by 1.5
to 3 mm broad. They are the “larvae of a bot- fly, and resemble
those of the Gastrophilusof the horse. Their characters areas follow:—
Body of the larva fusiform, acute anteriorly, obtuse posteriorly,
consisting of twelve segments including the head, which is armed
with a pair of strong, black, hooked maxillae; terminal segment
with a pair of trilateral oval, ‘chitinous disks, each with three spir-
acles; intermediate segments with numerous minute recurved hook-
lets, disposed in incompletely separated bands at the fore and back
part of the segments.
The sac containing the larvae is about three fourths of an inch
long and half an inch broad, with a short tubular prolongation open
at the extremity. It was uncertain whether the sac formed part of the
intestine.
The dish of stewed terrapins was suspected to have been a mixture
of the diamond-back, Emys palustris and the red-bellied terrapin
E. rugosa. This is not the only instance of the occurrence of bots
in turtles, as Prof. A.S. Packard notes the case of larvae being
found in the skin of the neck of the box-turtle, Cistudo carolina?
DECEMBER 20.
Mr. Geo. W. Tryon Jr. in the chair.
Twelve persons present.
iProcwAL. Nwon leoss lll:
2 American Naturalist, 1882, 598.
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 395
A paper entitled “The Miocene Mollusca of the State of New
Jersey,’ by Angelo Heilprin, was presented for publication.
Determination of the Age of Rock Deposits—Prof Heilprin, re-
ferring to the methods that had been used by geologists and physi-
cists to determine the rate of formation of rock masses, stated that
in the case of the organically-formed rocks, especially those, like the
chalk, which were largely in the nature of a deep-sea deposit, the
data deduced from sedimentation and accumulation were of little or
no value, since the rate of growth here was almost wholly depend-
ent upon the rate of development of the oceanic organisms which
use lime in the construction of their hard parts. In the deposit now
accumulating along the sea-bottom, known as the Atlantic or Globi-
gerina ooze, the speaker thought we had some direct clue bearing
upon the solution of the problem. Manifestly, there can be no more
rapid accumulation of the calcareous ooze than there is lime-carbon-
ate suspended in the sea; and again, the quantity of lime-carbonate
(in the form of microscopic tests and fragments) suspended in the
sea must depend upon the quantity of the formative material con-
tained in the sea—the quantity of lime carried in by the rivers.
The researches of the officers of the Challenger expedition have shown
that ina column of oceanic water of 600 feet depth, with a transverse
area of one square mile, there are contained some 16 tons of suspended
organic (foraminiferal) particles; these, if precipitated to the floor
of the sea, would make a deposit z5355 inch in thickness. Now,
it would seem from careful observations made on many of the most
important rivers of the globe’ that the quantity of lime carried out
by them into the sea annually is about one-sixth that of their sus-
pended sediment, and would cover the sea-bottom, if precipitated
at a rate proportional to that of the removal of continental sediment,
one foot in 3000 years—to a depth of about ;;55 inch. Assuming
that one-half of this amount is used by the Foraminifera for the con-
struction of their shells, the rest being taken up by the mollusks,
corals, etc., then the foraminiferal accumulation from this (ap-
parently the only) available source would be the 555 part of an inch
annually, or very nearly the amount that would accumulate from
the droppings contained in the 600-foot column of water, as deduced
from the Challenger determinations. At this extremely slow rate of
accumulation, it would require a period of 100000 years to form a
single foot, and where, as in the case of the Chalk, we have a similar
deposit hundreds of feet in thickness, we would require a period of
millions of years for its formation. The speaker stated that there were
probably factors involved in a more rapid formation of the Atlantic
ooze with which we were not acquainted, and it hardly appeared
credible to him that the rate of formation could be as slow as the data
indicate. But the method of calculation was based upon tangible
facts, and was accordingly interesting.
1Mellard Reade, Presidential Address, Liverpool Geol. Soc., Oct. 1876.
396 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
DECEMBER 27.
Mr. Tuomas Mrrnan, Vice-President, in the chair.
Seventy persons present.
The death of Dr. Ferdinand V. Hayden, a member, was announced.
Papers under the following titles were presented for publication:—
“Description of New Species of Uniones from Florida.” By
Berlin Hart Wright.
“A Bibliographic and Synomymic Catalogue of the Genus Auri-
culella Pfr.” By Wm. D. Hartman M. D.
“A Bibliographic and Synomymic Catalogue of the Genus Acha-
tinella Swnsn.” By Wm. D. Hartman M. D.
The following was ordered to be printed :-—
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 397
THE MIOCENE MOLLUSCA OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY.
BY PROF. ANGELO HEILPRIN.
The known forms of miocene mollusca of the State of New Jersey
numbered up to 1884, the year when I published my “Contributions
to'jthe Tertiary Geology and Paleontology of the United States,”
some thirty species, as follows:
Ostrea Virginica (O. Mauricensis.)
Ostrea percrassa
Pecten Humphreysti
Plicatula densata
Mytilus inflatus ?
Tithodomus subalveatus
Carditamera aculeata
Carditamera arata
Crassatella melina
‘Astarte Thomasii
Astarte distans
Mysia parilis
Yoldia limatula
Venus Ducatellii
Venus plena
Mercenaria cancellata
Tellina Shilohensis
Tellina peracuta
Tellinella(?)capillifera
Thracia myceformis
Anatina alta
Corbula elevata
Saxicava parilis
Turbinella Woodi
Fulgur scalariformis
Natica catenoides ?
Turritella equistriata
Turritella Cumberlandia
Turritella secta
Fissurella Griscomi.
398 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
Several excursions with my class to the “marl” diggings near
Shiloh, Cumberland Co., and the examination of material from an
artesian well-boring in Atlantic City (kindly placed in my hands by
Mr. Lewis Woolman), enable me to increase this list by about fifty
species, of which some four or five prove to be new forms. The
following species have been identified from the diggings near Shiloh :
Ostrea percrassa
Pecten Humphreysti, var. Woolmani (Heilprin)
Pecten Madisonius
Plicatula densata
Mytilus injlatus
Mytiloconcha incurva
Lithodomus sp. ?
Perna maxillata
Arca centenaria
Arca Marylandica
Pectunculus lentiformis
Nucula obliqua
Yoldia limatula
Astarte distans
Astarte compsonema
Crassatellu melina
Carditamera arata
Carditamera aculeata
Lnuecina crenulata
Cardium laqueatum
Chama congregata
Venus athleta
Venus mercenaria ?
Venus (Mercenaria cancellata ? Gabb.)
Mactra lateralis
Tellina sp.?
Teredo sp,?
Saxicava parilis ? CS. insita ?)
Murex nov. sp.
Turbinella Woodi
Fulgur scalariformis
Cantharus Cumberlandianus
Nassa trivittata
Columbella communis
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 399
Terebra curvilirata
Triforis nov. sp.
Cancellaria sp.?
Marginella sp.?
Pleurotoma nov. sp.
Turbo eboreus
Carinorbis (Delphinula) globulus
(D. lyra ? Conrad)
Natica hemicrypta
Turritella Cumberlandia
Turritella cequistriata
Trochita centralis
Crucibulum costatum
Crepidula fornicata
Crepidula plana ?
Fissurella Griscomi
Discina ( Orbicula) lugubris
Of the species here indicated the greater number have been
found in States other than New Jersey, and leave no doubt that the
deposits which they represent constitute a part of the regular Mio-
cene series of the Atlantic border. The general faunal facies is most
nearly that of the Lower Atlantic Miocene (“Marylandian’’) or
Middle Atlantic Miocene (“Virginian”), with a decided leaning to-
ward the former, whose position it occupies geographically. I have
elsewhere (Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 1880 pp. 31-32; Contrib.
Tert. Geol. and Paleont. U.S., p. 9,) given reasons for referring these
Cumberland County deposits to the ‘‘Marylandian” division of the
Atlantic Miocene, a reference which appears justified, apart from
other considerations, by the presence of such fossils as Ostrea per-
erassa, Pecten Humphreysii, Perna maxillata, Crassatella melina, ete.
These species belong to the Lower Miocene (Contrib. Tert. Geol. and
Paleont. U.8., pp. 71 and 77), and characterize principally the basal
series of deposits. Indeed, it is a little questionable if they do not
actually connect with the Oligocene.
The newer Miocene deposits, as determined by their fossil remains,
had not been recognized in the State prior to the present year,
although the existence of such deposits in their proper position
could not reasonably be doubted. In my work above referred to
(1884) I remark (p.9): “It is very likely that both divisions of the
Miocene indicated by me as occurring in Maryland and Virginia,
400 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
and by me designated as the ‘Marylandian’ and ‘Virginian,’ or
the lower and middle Atlantic Miocenes respectively, will eventually
be found to be equally well-marked off in New Jersey, although up
to the present time, from the sparseness of the fossil remains that
have been collected, no such subdivision could be satisfactorily at-
tempted. But from what material we have at hand, it may be
safely asserted that the localities which have been so assiduously
searched in the neighborhood of Shiloh, and elsewhere in Salem and
Cumberland Counties, belong to the older, or ‘Marylandian’ divis-
ion.”
The existence of the newer Miocene deposits has now been def-
initely determined through the material obtained by Mr. Woolman
from the artesian boring at Atlantic City, which has been placed in
my hands for examination. The species of fossils obtained here are
the following:
Discina lugubris
Ostrea sp.?
Anomia ephippium ?
Pecten Madisonius
Pecten Humphreysii
Pecten vicenarius ?
Perna maxillata
Mytilus incrassatus
Mytiloconcha ineurva
Arca centenaria
Arca subrostrata
Arca idonea ?
Arca lienosa ?
Nucula obliqua
Astarte compsonema
Astarte obruta
Astarte perplana ?
Astarte Thomasii
Cardita granulata
Carditamera arata
Crassatella melina
Cardium Claqueatum ?)
Lucina trisuleata ?
Lucina erenulata
Mysia sp.?
1887.] NATTRAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 401
Cytherea Sayana ?
Artemis acetabulum
Venus sp.?
Donax variabilis
Mactra lateralis
Mactra ponderosa ?
Tellina declivis
Tellina subreflexa
Corbula idonea
Corbula elevata
Turbinella Woodi
Fulqur sp?
Nassa trivitiata
Natica sp.?
Turritella Cumberlandia
Turritella equistriata
Turritella plebeia
Barnacles
Kehinoid fragments
Dendrophyllia (coral)
Lamna compressa
Odontaspis
Myliobatis
Crocodilian bone
Many of the species occur only in fragments, but the greater num-
ber admit of definite determination. Unfortunately, in most in-
stances, the depth at which they were obtained could not be ascer-
tained, and in so far, therefore, such species give but little positive
evidence as to the horizons which they actually represent. But the
introduction of a very considerable number of forms, as compared
with the number of such forms occurring in the deposits near Shiloh,
which are more or less characteristic of the “Virginian” (Middle
Atlantic Miocene) deposits, and those of still newer date (“Caroli-
nian”), leave no room for doubt that a distinct faunal horizon,—
the correspondent, in all probability, of the Middle Miocene—is
penetrated by the bore. Again, that the older beds are also repre-
sented is proved by the occurrence of Perna mawillata, Pecten
Humphreysii, Crassatella melina, ete., but only in the case of
the first-named species, Perna mazillata, could the absolute posi-
tion—depth of some 800 feet—in the section be obtained. The po-
402 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
sition here indicated accords approximately with the theoretical
position deduced from a calculation of dip and strike, using the
Shiloh Perna beds as an equivalent. At a height of some 350 feet
above the Perna beds, and consequently, at an actual depth of about
450 feet, occurs a stratum containing large numbers of Turritella
plebeia, a species, which in Maryland, incisively marks the newer
Miocene deposits of the State (7. e. the “Virginian’’), as distinguished
from the older (“Marylandian”). Its presence in the position which
it occupies in the Atlantic City bore section would, of itself, be al-
most sufficient to determine the existence of a second faunal horizon.
The following table enumerates, as far as is known to me, all the
Molluscan species that have been thus far determined from the
Miocene formation of the State:
Disceina lugubris, Conr. Mioe. Foss., p. 75.
Ostrea Virginica (O. Mauricensis) Gmel.
Ostrea percrassa, Conr. Mioe. Foss., p. 50.
Pecten Humphreysti, Conr. Bull. Nat. Inst., p. 194.
Pecten Madisonius, Say. Journ. A. N.S., IV. p. 134.
Pecten vicenarius? Conr. Proc. A. N.S., 1. p. 306.
Anomia ephippium ? L.
Plicatula densata, Conr. Proc. A. N.S. 1. p. 311.
Mytilus inflatus, Tuomey and Holmes. Plioc. Foss., p. 33.
Mytilus incrassatus, Conr. A. J. Science, XLI., p. 247.
Mytiloconcha incurva, Conr. Mioc. Foss., p. 52.
Lithodomus subalveatus, Conr. A. J. Conch., II, p. 73.
Perna mawxillata, Lam.
Area centenaria, Say. Journ. A. N.S., IV., p. 138.
Arca Marylandica, Conr. Mioc. Foss., p. 54.
Areca subrostrata, Conr. Mioc. Foss., p. 58. .
Area idonea? Conr. Foss. Tert. Form., p. 15.
Arca lienosa ? Say. Amer. Conch., pl. 36.
Pectunculus lentiformis, Conr. Mioc. Foss., p. 64.
Nucula obliqua, Say. A. J. Scieuce, II, p. 40.
Yoldia limatula, Say. Amer. Conch., pl. 12.
Astarte compsonema, Conr. A. J. Conch., II, p. 72.
Astarte obruta, Conr. Journ. A. N.S., VII, p. 15.
Astarte perplana? Conr. Mioce. Foss., p. 48.
Astarte Thomasii, Conr.. Proc. A. N.8., VII, p. 267.
Astarte distans, Conr. Proc. A. N.S., 14, p. 288.
Crassatella melina, Conr. Mioc. Foss., p. 22.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 403
Cardita granulata, Say. Journ, A. N.S., IV., p. 142.
Carditamera arata, Conr. Mioc. Foss., p. 11.
Carditamera aculeata, Conr. Proc. A. N.S., 14, p. 585.
Incina erenulata, Conr. Mioc. Foss., p. 39.
LIncina trisuleata ? Conr. « »-.» » 109 | Rodentia, ;.. <7 ee seeeeeeencan
Gannivorasse ee eae eee (all enicentatar PREP iin oc: lS:
Ungulata and Proboscidea, . . 205 | Insectivora, .°. © 2)
@heiroptera,s Gh 6G 26a SG 2 | Didelphya, . . \.e0e ee
Cetacea,. . 2 =)» «» .» se )62 | Monotremata, 2) 1
Sirenia, Shavit eck eee arene 9
It will thus be seen that while some of the orders are largely repre-
sented, others are very deficient, and require much in the way of addi-
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 413
tion before they can be considered to be in any way sufficient. The
Academy has received much assistance toward filling gaps from the
Zoological Society of this city, which has on several occasions do-
nated some of the rarer animals which, through death, were no
longer serviceable in the Zoological Gardens. Among these may
be enumerated a hippopotamus, kangaroo, wombat, echidna, ete.
It is hoped that with more intimate relations between the two in-
stitutions further advantages of this kind may be acquired. Itisa
singular fact in connection with the development of an institution
like the Academy, that while its collections frequently embrace
numbers of specimens that are considered rare, and not ordinarily
obtainable, other specimens, much more common, are largely or
wholly wanting. Thus, in the case of our own institution, while
there is what might be termed a superabundance of the skulls of
tigers, bears and wolves, there is not a single complete skeleton
of the ordinary cow or ox, sheep or goat; and it was only during
the course of the present year that the Academy obtained, through
purchase ($100), the skeleton of the American bison. The disartic-
ulated parts of a second individual were received at about the same
time from the Smithsonian Institution at Washington, through the
good offices of the late Prof. Spencer F. Baird. It is especially de-
sirable that the commoner animals should have a representation in
the museum, and it is earnestly to be wished that the museum fund
may be so far increased as to permit of purchases in this direction.
In the department of Ornithology, the Academy has profited
through the services of a special taxidermist, Mr. I. S. Reiff, who
has, with a fair amount of care, examined the greater number of
the 30,000 birds in the collection, applying arsenical poisoning and
insect-powder where necessary, and readjusting the plumage of par-
tially mutilated specimens. The total number of birds marked out
as no longer serviceable for museum purposes is some 12 or 13, a
very insignificant number when the extent of the collection is taken
into account, and when it is remembered that this represents a
destruction, not only for a single year, but for several years past.
The immunity from insect depredations is not a little remarkable,
seeing how imperfect the ornithological cases appear to be in com-
parison with those which more modern methods have succeeded in
producing. An application of pure naphthaline in cores will be at-
tempted this year as a further preventive of destruction. The fol-
lowing list indicates the species of birds which have been removed
414 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
from the cases as above stated: Treron aromatica (Java), Treron
aromatica (Ambunensis, Java), Chasmarhynchus variegatus (Brazil),
Pitta cerulia (Java), Cassicus hemorrhous (8. Amer.), Aleopus picot-
des (Kast Indies), Turdus sp.? (New Jersey), Thryothrus luscinia,
Icterus Girardii (Guatemala), undet. (East Indies), and Spermestes
Poensis (Fernando Po).
The Ornithological department has recevied valuable and exten-
sive accessions during the year, the more important being a collec-
tion of skins from the collection of Dr. H. B. Butcher, presented in
the name of J. Dickinson Sergeant, and a like collection presented
by Dr. W. L. Abbott of this city. The latter, consisting principally
of birds of the United States, the West India Islands, and South
and Central America, is estimated to number between two and three
thousand skins, mostly in a very good state of preservation. These,
for want of space-room, have not yet been definitely located, and it
is imperative that some immediate provision be made for their safe-
keeping.
To the departments of Geology, Mineralogy and Paleontology
there have been a number of additions, in the main of no very great
importance, except in so far as pertains to the specimens purchased
by the Wm. 8. Vaux fund. These are referred to in the report of
the special conservator, herewith appended. The extensive collec-
tions of Florida fossils and rocks, which were obtained in the early
part of last year, and which, for want of case room, had been, dur-
ing study, temporarily deposited in the room’ properly belonging to
Archeology and Ethnology, are now in a condition to be placed in
their proper position, a number (10) of new cases having recently been
added to the main floor. By their addition the collection of ter-
tiary invertebrate fossils of the Academy becomes by far the most
important of any in the country, and falls probably but little below
that of any in the world. Valuable accessions to the paleontolog-
ical collections are an almost complete skull, leg bones, ribs, etce., of
a Mastodon, found near Pemberton, N. J., which were generously
donated to the institution by J. Coleman Saltar, of Pemberton, and
Emlen McConnell, of Philadelphia, two young students of geology
who first called attention to the interesting find. This is the most
perfect specimen of the animal that has been found in the State
during a period of some forty years.
There have been but few additions to the department of Arch-
eology, and attention is called to the report of the Professor of
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 415
Ethnology and Archeology, who deplores that for want of room he
should be compelled to decline donations to this section of his de-
partment. The condition of overcrowding is, unfortunately, only
too true for almost all'{the other departments, and the necessity for
an extension to the present building becomes more pressing every
day. Unless assistance is rendered in this direction the collections
of the Academy, which are of their kind probably still the most ex-
tensive and important in the country, must cease to grow. An
appeal to the Legislature of the State, made in the early part of the
year, for aid in constructing an annex in which to exhibit the
natural history resources of the State of Pennsylvania and the ex-
tensive collection of the State Geological Survey—deposited in the
cellar of the Academy—was favorably reported upon in Committee,
but failed of its purpose by reason of a design to construct a Survey
Museum in the State Capital. The encouragement and endorsement
which the Academy’s petition met from many of the most
influential citizens of Pennsylvania—Congressional representatives,
merchants, manufacturers, and those most interested in the develop-
ment of the natural history resources of the State—lead to the hope
that at no very distant day that assistance may be obtained which has
so long been needed. In the meantime it is earnestly to be hoped that
he patriotic instincts of the citizens of Philadelphia will generously
assert themselves, and not allow that institution to go in want which
has cast so much lustre, not only upon the science of the city, but
upon the science of tlte whole country.
In its educational workings the Academy is doing much good.
The museum has been thrown open free to the classes of all institu-
tions of learning, and the collections are largely made use of by
schools both in and out of the city. The attendance at the class
lectures, as well as participation in the field-excursions in connection
with these, is also considerable, and shows that the facilities for
study and work afforded by the Academy are largely appreciated.
The course of popular evening lectures which, on the recommenda-
tion of the professors, and with the approval of the Council, was
inaugurated in the spring of last year, has proved successful beyond
expectation, and has led to the preparation of a more extended
course, now in process of execution. Unfortunately, the hall of the
Academy is not well suited to the delivery of lectures to large
audiences, and hence no absolute satisfaction can be given toa large
proportion of the listeners. But the character of the attendance
speaks well for the interest in the work.
416 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
In connection with the work of facilitating study in the several
departments of natural history, the Curator-in-Charge desires to
call attention to a synoptic collection of minerals, rocks, and fossils,
which has been arranged on the main floor as a practical key or
cuide to geological inquiry and to the various text-books that have
been prepared upon the subject. The arrangement of the collection,
which is contained in ten table-cases, is approximately as follows:
rock-forming minerals, accessory minerals in rocks, ores, rocks proper,
rock-structures, distinctive groups of fossils, and the genera of recent
shells. It is thought that through a collection of this kind much
valuable assistance can be given to the student, to whom the large
general collections of the Academy can be of but little service.
Specimens for study have during the year been loaned to Profs.
Scott and Osborn, of Princeton, N. J., Prof. R. P. Whitfield, of
New York, and Prof. O. C. Marsh, of New Haven.
In conclusion, the Curator-in-Charge desires to call attention to
three pressing wants of the Academy: 1. The absolute need of an
extension to the present building, wherein to store the rapidly
increasing collections, and to accommodate the material already in
possession that can no longer find proper place for exhibition.
2. An amphitheatre or lecture-hall suitable for large audiences ;
and 38. A museum fund, wherewith to purchase such needed speci-
mens for the Museum as do not come in the regular way of donation.
It is also earnestly recommended that some provision be made
toward permitting access to the Museum on Sundays. It cannot be
denied that a large part of the population of our city is debarred
from the advantages offered by the Academy by reason of the in-
stitution being closed on the only day which is free to the artisan,
merchant or mechanic. Complaint in this regard is frequently
made, and it is much to be wished that the Academy may at an
early day meet the generous demand that is made upon it. The
additional expense that would be entailed upon the institution
through such opening, while beyond the resources available at pres-
ent, must necessarily be slight, and it is but fair to assume that such
assistance might be obtained as will permit of the project being car-
ried into execution.
Very respectfully,
ANGELO HEILPRIN,
Curator-in- Charge.
JosEPH LEIDY,
Ch’n Curators.
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 417
REPORT OF THE CURATOR OF THE WILLIAM &.
VAUX COLLECTIONS.
The Curator of the William 8. Vaux collections respectfully
submits his fifth annual report to the Council of the Academy :—
The collections are in good order and condition. No change has
been made since the report of 1886, except such as would necessarily
result from the introduction of the new specimens added to the
collections.
During the year 156 specimens were purchased at a cost of $638.00.
To accommodate the increase, $44.60 have been expended for two
new cases.
The collections consist at present as follows :—
Number of mineral specimens as per report of 1886, d 6,630
Purchased during the year ending November 30, . 5 156
Total, : , : : : 4 6,786
Archeological specimens (same as reported in 1886), —.. 2,940
The growth of the collections since they came into the Academy’s
possession has been as follows :—
Specimens purchased in 1884, __.. : ; : : 60
Specimens purchased in 1885, .. : : : : 104
Specimens purchased in 1886, : : ; , 114
Specimens purchased in 1887, _.. ; : ‘ , 156
Total, : : : : : 5 ‘ c 434
The aggregate cost of these has been. ; ‘ $2086.70
Among those purchased during the present year most worthy of
special notice may be mentioned a Stalagmite of Aragonite. This
specimen measures 4 ft. 4 in. in height, and weighs about 100 pounds.
It was taken from a cavern in the Organ Mountain, New Mexico,
and is believed to be an unusually fine example of stalagmitic for-
mation. Other interesting specimens are a fine group of Rutiles
from Georgia, remarkable for their high lustre and sharp angles of
crystallization; a large specimen of Wulfenite from Arizona, the
stone matrix of which is 6 by 8 inches, coated over with beautiful
red translucent crystals of Molybdate of lead; a large specimen of
Stibnite from Japan, weighing 125 pounds, consisting of a group of
418 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
70 or 80 well terminated crystals of Antimony Sulphide, with beau-
tiful modifications; and several specimens of Azurite and Malachite
from Arizona.
Respectfully submitted,
JACOB BINDER,
Curator.
REPORT OF THE BIOLOGICAL AND MICRO-
SCOPICAL SECTION.
During the year 17 stated meetings were held with an average
attendance of 10 members.
The Annual Exhibition was held Dec. 9th, 1886 with the ‘aaa
success.
One member and eight contributors were elected during the year.
The deaths of Dr. N. A. Randolph and of Paul P. Keller were
announced. )
The following are the more important subjects under discussion
during the year:—
December 6, 1886. Recent advances in Embryology, by Prof.
J. A. Ryder.
December 6, 1886. Fructification in the Algae, by Dr. L.
Brewer Hall.
January 3, 1887. Observations upon Trichia scabra, by Harold
Wingate.
January 3, 1887. Demonstration of Prof. Ryder’s ribbon cutting
Microtome.
January 17, 1887. Observations upon the eggs of the Skate, by
Prof. J. A. Ryder.
February 9, 1887. Upon the best methods of making Cells, by
Dr. L. Ashley Faught.
February 9, 1887. The blastodermic layers in the yolk of different
animals, by Prof. J. A. Ryder.
February 21, 1887. The hairs and spines of Onosmodium Vir-
giniana and other plants, by Dr. J. B. Brinton.
February 21, 1887. Experiments with the moth larva in refer-
ence to the manner in which they injure wood fibres, by George
B. Cock.
March 7, 1887. Experiments with the moth larva and Cock-
roach with referrence to the manner in which they injure wool
fibres, by George B. Cock.
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 419
April 4, 1887, Upon the anatomy of the sexual apparatus of
the Bee, by Prof. J. A. Ryder.
April 4, 1887. Description of a new Microtome for making
large sections of the brain ete., by Prof. J. A. Ryder.
April 18, 1887. The hearing organ of Mysis flexuosa, by
by Harold Wingate.
April 18, 1887. Hemiarcyria serpula, by Dr. George A. Rex.
April 18, 1887. Structure of the leaf of Deutzia, by Dr. J. B.
Brinton.
April 18, 1887. Anatomy of the leg of the Honey Bee, by Dr.
L. Brewer Hall.
April 18, 1887. The making of wax cells, by John C. Wilson.
June 6, 1887. Karyokinesis, by Prof. J. A. Ryder.
September 19, 1887. The evolution of an eight-limbed verte-
brate, by Prof. J. A. Ryder.
' September 19, 1887. The warts upon the legs of the Horse, by
Prof. Harrison Allen.
October 3, 1887. The development of the ovum in the Field
Mouse, by Prof. J. A. Ryder.
October 17, 1887. Placentation in animals, by Prof. J. A.
Ryder.
On October 17, a course of lectures to be delivered during the
winter was arranged by the lecture committee. The first one by
Prof. J. A. Ryder upon “The two great Plans of Animal Organiza-
tion” was given in the hall of the Academy Monday, November
21, 1887.
Very respectfully,
Rosert J. Hess,
Recorder.
REPORT OF THE CONCHOLOGICAL SECTION.
The Recorder of the Conchological Section respectfully reports
that during the year past, such Conchological papers as have been
accepted have been published by the Academy as heretofore.
The Section has lost by death, one member, Isaac Lea, LL. D.
who died in last December at the advanced age of ninety four years.
At a special meeting of the section held Dec. 14th, 1886 the follow-
ing minute was adopted and by direction transmitted to his family.
420 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
“The Republic of Natural Sciences has lost a generous friend and an
efficient workman by the death of Dr. Isaac Lea. His services to
the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, have extended
through seventy-one years from June 1815. He was one of the
founders of the Conchological Section, Dec. 1866, and was its first
Director. During a period of over fifty years he gave his time and
talents, his labor, influence and money in aiding the progress of
Conchology in its several departments and especially in that of the
fresh water mollusks. In this he was leader and master, and among
the first in authority. His name is conspicuous wherever Con-
chology is studied on account of the valuable services he has
rendered in this department of the Natural Sciences.
His happy life was prolonged far beyond the common lot. We
sincerely deplore his loss. Our sympathies are with his family.
We place this record on our minutes in testimony of our sense of
his high and in every respect exemplary character and conduct.”
Mr. G. W. Tryon Jr., Conservator, reports as follows :—
“The presentation by Mrs. Susan D. Brown of Princeton N. J.,
of the extensive and valuable collection of pulmoniferous land shells
made by her late son Albert D. Brown is the principal event in the
history of our section during the year. Mr. Brown, a well known
conchologist and one of the founders of this Section, by devoting
his attention to a single great group of the mollusca succeeded in
amassing a collection which, for the completeness of its suites and
beauty of arrangement ranked easily among the best in the world.
His mother, anxious to place these treasures where they would be
most useful, offered them to us subject to no restriction whatever.
Upon consideration of the extent and condition of the collection,
your conservator decided that no portion of the mounted series
should be excluded from our cases; for although we already pos-
sessed a large proportion of the species, the localities were in most
cases different, and the specimens frequently much finer than ours.
Hundreds of the species were, however, new to us. The mounting
and labelling of the Brown shells was confided to Mr. Frank Stout,
and this duty, which has occupied his time for the major portion of
the year, has been very acceptably performed. The collection num-
bers 5404 trays and labels, containing 19,593 specimens. Mrs.
Brown also presented the fine microscope used by her late son. A
suitable inscription has been engraved upon this instrument, which
is intended for the use of members of the section and conchological
students generally.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 421
Other important accessions include suites of the land shells of
China from B. Schmacker and Rev. M. Heude, those from the latter
being a set of his types, a collection of Philippine and two of
Polynesian shells obtained by purchase, a series of the shells dredged
in southern American waters by Dr. Wm. H. Rush, U.S. N. includ-
ing a number of recently described new species, a collection from
Canton, Ills. from J. Wolf, and a large collection of Iowa shells from
B. Shimek. Our American suites have continued to be enriched,
as heretofore, by the gifts of numerous friends. In all 47 additions
from 31 sources have been made aggregating 739 lots and 3699
specimens (see Additions to Museum.) These have all been labelled
and are incorporated in the collection ee now embraces 51,327
trays and labels and 189,150 specimens.”
Five members and fourteen Ser rape neepte have been elected
during the year.
No changes have been made in the By-Laws of the section.
The officers for 1888 are :—
Director, . ; : . W.S. W. Ruschenberger.
Vice-Director, . . . John Ford.
Recorder, . ; : . §. Raymond Roberts. .
Secretary, . : : . John H. Redfield.
Treasurer, . : F . Wm. L. Mactier.
TAbrarian, . ; : . Edward J. Nolan.
Conservator, : Geo. W. Tryon, Jr.
Respectfully milftorteed,
S. RaymMonp RoBeErts,
Recorder.
REPORT OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SECTION.
The Recorder of the Entomological Section, would state that the
year now closing, has been one of advanced success. The meetings
have shown a marked improvement in the attendance of the mem-
bers, also in the increased interest in the proceedings.
Much valuable information to Entomologists has been given,
through the remarks and addresses made by those present. Dr.
Horn has especially studied to assist all who were interested in the
special branch of Coleoptera. The section has held seven meetings
in the year, at which various entomological matters have been
discussed.
422 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
The American Entomological Society has been able during the
year to publish about 225 pages of its Transactions, and in addition
thereto has issued a supplementary volume, containing 351 pages,
making a total amount of about 575 pages of printed matter issued.
The collections have been cared for by the custodian and curator,
and are in a remarkably good condition.
The following are the officers elected for the ensuing year.
Director, . : : ; . Geo. H. Horn, M.D.
Vice-Director, . ; ; . Rev. H. C. McCook, D. D.
Recorder, . ; g : . J. H. Ridings.
Treasurer, . E. T. Cresson.
TE cparalle submitted,
J. H. Rrprnes,
Recorder.
REPORT OF THE BOTANICAL SECTION.
The Botanical Section respectfully reports that at the annual
election for the coming year, the following officers were elected :—
Director, : : . Dr. W.S8. W. Ruschenberger.
Vice-Director, : 4 . Thomas Meehan.
Recorder, ; : ; . Dr. Charles Schaffer.
Cor. Secretary and Treasurer,. Isaac C. Martindale.
Conservator, . : ; . John H. Redfield.
The Section is out of debt and has a balance with its Treasurer.
The meetings have been held regularly on the appointed evenings,
with a full average attendance, and honored at times by distinguished
visitors. At every meeting communications have been received
and discussed, and some of the more important have been printed in
the Proceedings of the Academy.
The Herbarium continues the encouraging growth reported for
several years, the past year being perhaps still more encouraging
than the others. Through the attention of the Conservator, John
H. Redfield, aided by Mr. Burk, everything is distributed as fast as
received, and the record shows that the collection now embraces of
flowering plants and ferns a total of 27,267 species out of a possible
100,000 known to Botanists. 1078 were new additions of the past
season.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 423
The Conservator’s account of our progress in detail is attached as
part of this report.
Respectfully submitted,
THomAs MEEHAN,
Vice-Director.
Conservator’s Report for 1887.—The Conservator of the Botanical
Section reports that the donations to the Herbarium during the
year closing December 12th, are estimated to be 7921 species, of
which 2245 are Phanerogams and Ferns, 5601 are Fungi and 75 are
Lichens. Of the 2245 species of phanerogamic plants and ferns,
1078 are believed to be new to our collection, 98 of them represent-
ing new genera. 1099 are North American, 611 are from Mexico
and South America, 64 are from the Eastern Continent and 471 are
Australian. What portion of the Fungi may be new to the collec-
tion cannot be estimated until the completion of the catalogue of
this Order now in progress.
For the principal part of the large additions to the Academy’s
collection of Fungi, we are indebted to Mrs. Anna T. Martin, widow
of the late Dr. Geo. Martin of West Chester, who has presented to
us the entire collection made by her husband, consisting of 4040
specimens neatly mounted in pockets and placed in boxes, and all
numbered to correspond with MSS. catalogues accompanying,
These were mostly collected by Ravenel, Rehm, Kunze, Rabenhorst,
and Winter and by Dr. Martin himself. The donation also included
Centuries I to XVII of Ellis’ North American Fungi, of which 15
Centuries are duplicates to those possessed by us. Drs. Rex and
Wingate have also kindly presented Centuries XVIII and XIX of
the same series making it complete to the present time. These im-
portant additions taken in connection with the earlier collections of
Schweinitz, Ravenel, Michener and others, make this department of
our Herbarium of unusual value, and call for thorough re-arrange-
ment and critical examination of our material and the preparation
of such a catalogue of our Fungi, as shall make the whole readily
accessible and useful to students. This task has, by the Section, been
committed to Messrs. Stevenson, Rex, Brinton and Wingate, and
we may hope it will be completed within another year.
The number of species of phanerogams and ferns, represented in
our Herbarium at date of last report, was . , : ABO So
to which add the estimated accessions of the past year . 1,078
and we have the estimated present total . : 5 . 27,267
424 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
Among the additions of the past year worthy of special notice are
the following, for which we are indebted to members of the Section :—
four remittances from Baron F. von Miller of Melbourne, Australia,
through Mr. Meehan, containing 471 species of Australian plants,
of which 310 are new to the collection, 52 of them representing new
genera :—a collection made by Dr. Palmer in the Mexican State of
Jalisco, in 1886, embracing 510 species, of which one-half were new
to us :—and a first instalment of the plants collected by N. N. Rusby
in Chili, Bolivia and Brazil in 1885 and 1886, consisting of about
450 species. Most of the latter are yet undetermined except as to genus,
but it is estimated that about one-half are new to us, many of them
being yet undescribed.
The time and labor required for the proper care of the new addi-
tions and for their incorporation into the Herbarium, have some-
what retarded the work of mounting the North American portion of
it, nevertheless material progress has been made. All of the Poly-
petalous and Monopetalous orders are now mounted and some portions
of the remainder, leaving less than one-fourth of the work yet unac-
complished. In all the work that has been performed, the Conser-
vator has been greatly aided by the efficient services of Mr. Isaac
Burk.
In order to provide space for the Martin collection of Fungi, it
became absolutely necessary to make some disposal of a large amount
of duplicate plants, which had been gradually accumulating through
a long period of years, many of them of considerable value, others
in bad condition. These by vote of the Section, have been sent to
Bryn Mawr College on terms believed to be mutually advantageous,
and the proceeds will be used for the increase of the Herbarium.
A complete list of the additions accompanies this report, and will
appear in its proper place, under the head of “Additions to the
Museum.”
Respectfully submitted,
JoHN. H. REDFIELD,
Conservator.
REPORT OF THE MINERALOGICAL AND
GEOLOGICAL SECTION.
The Mineralogical and Geological Section would respectfully re-
port to the Academy, that a number of meetings have been held
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 425
during the year, but that owing to absence of members and other
causes, the attendance and interest has not been as great as in former
years, nor have the additions to the collections been as large, ex-
cepting those to the Vaux collection.
It would also report that the officers elected for the ensuing year,
are as follows:
Director, . : ; ; : ; . Theo. D. Rand.
Vice-Director, . : : : , . W. W. Jefteris.
Recorder and Secretary, . : : . Charles Sciffer.
Treasurer, . : : : : 5 . John Ford.
Conservator, : . W. W. Jefteris.
Respectfully submitted,
THeEo. D. Rann,
Director.
CuHAs. SCHAFFER,
Recorder.
REPORT OF THE PROFESSOR OF INVERTEBRATE
PALEONTOLOGY.
The Professor of Invertebrate Paleontology respectfully reports
that during the year he has conducted a course of practical instruc-
tion in geology and paleontology, the course comprising some twenty-
five lectures in the class-room and nine field demonstrations. The
attendance in the lecture-room was about forty, and in the field
thirty or more. Much good work was done in the field, the two ex-
cursions to the marl diggings in the southern part of New Jersey,
adding considerably to our knowledge of the Tertiary fauna of the
State. Thirty species not hitherto recorded had been identified,
and three new forms determined. The existence of the Newer
Miocene deposits had also been determined by one of the members
of the class, Mr. Lewis Woolman, who has published a paper on the
subject in the Proceedings of the Academy. The undersigned has
Fikewise prepared a paper upon the New Jersey Miocene fauna, giv-
ing a complete list of the Miocene Molluscan species known to date.
The excursion supplementary to the general course, extended over a
period of nineteen days, comprising the region between the Del-
aware Water Gap and the Catskill Mts., and was participated in by
fifteen students.
28
426 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887,
The collections in the department of Invertebrate Paleontology
have received a number of accessions during the year, but none of
very great importance. Attention is called in the report of the
Curators to the addition of a number of new cases to the main floor
of the Museum, which will now permit of the definite location of the
Academy’s share of the extensive series of fossils collected in Florida
in the early part of last year, and which, during study, had been
temporarily deposited in the room pertaining to Ethnology and
Archeology. The arrangement of a synoptic geological and paleon-
tological collection, designed as a “key” or practical manual for the
student, is also indicated in the Curator’s report.
The collections in general have been studied by a number ot
students from the city schools, and material from them has been sent
to Prof. R. P. Whitfield, of New York, to assist in the preparation
of an extensive work on the fossil invertebrate fauna of the State of
New Jersey.
Very respectfully,
ANGELO HEILPRIN,
Prof. of Invertebrate Paleontology.
REPORT OF THE PROFESSOR OF INVERTEBRATE
ZOOLOGY.
The Professor of Invertebrate Zoology respectfully reports, that
during the past year he has delivered a series of ten lec-
tures on the “Sense Organs in the Animal Kingdom,” besides hav-
ing conducted a class in animal dissection during the spring months.
In the autumn he inaugurated a class in practical comparative his-
tology, which at present numbers six students, meeting once a week,
on Saturdays.
A course of some five lectures is intended to be given during
January and February of the coming year, on “Certain Chapters in
Zoological Philosophy.”
The additions to the Museum have not been very numerous nor
especially important, although comprising a number of interesting
forms that have been heretofore wanting. Much improvement
has been made by the Curator-in-Charge, in the more systematic
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 427
arrangement of the collections, and it is hoped in a very short time
a regular zoological sequence may be established.
Very respectfully,
BENJAMIN SHARP,
Professor of Invertebrate Zoology.
REPORT OF THE PROFESSOR OF MINERALOGY.
The Professor of Mineralogy respectfully reports that since his
last published report he has delivered in the Hall of the Academy
a course of twenty-flve lectures on Mineralogy, to a class of some
thirty persons. Field excursions and lectures in the neighborhood
of the city were given, as well as practical instruction in the labora-
tory of the Academy. During the past two years no lectures were
given on account of absence in Europe, the undersigned being en-
gaged during the winters in petrological studies at the University of
Heidelberg, and during the summers at geological researches in
Great Britain and on the continent. It is intended to deliver a
course of illustrated lectures upon Microscopical Petrology during
the present winter.
As shown by the accompanying report of the Curators, the min-
eralogical collection of the Academy has been enriched by a num-
ber of valuable additions.
Respectfully submitted,
H. Carviti Lewis,
Professor of Mineralogy.
REPORT OF THE PROFESSOR OF ETHNOLOGY AND
ARCH HOLOGY.
During the past year a private course of six lectures were deliv-
ered by me on Anthropology and several on Archeology in the pop-
ular course. They were well attended, and there have been many
indications that these subjects and those of pre-historic man and
Ethnology, which are properly branches of it, are exciting more and
more attention, both in the American scientific world at large and
particularly in this community and among members of the Academy.
428 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
The proposition has been urged by several members that a section
be formed especially devoted to these studies. If the time is not
already ripe for this, it undoubtedly will be soon.
In my last report, the attention of the Academy was called to the
insufficient accommodations now provided for the Archeological
and Ethnological collections of the Academy, and a resolution was
passed asking more specific statements on this point. The facts are
these: The present collection is scattered throughout the building,
portions of it being in every room where there are any collections
at all. Many of the objects are crowded together in space too re-
stricted to allow of their proper display. Many have to be stored
away in drawers or closed cases where the public or even students
can derive no advantage from them whatever. It has been found
impossible to arrange them in any satisfactory manner. In order to
accomplish this a much larger space should be assigned this branch
than it now occupies, and all the objects properly belonging to it
should be collected and disposed in the most illustrative manner.
The plan of such an arrangement should be distixictly the Ethnolog-
ical plan, not that adopted in the National Museum at Washington,
which for scientific purposes is the worst conceivable.
A great advantage which such increased space and scientific dis-
play would have would be to render manifest in what departments
- of anthropology the Academy is deficient, and would stimulate
members and their friends to supply such deficiencies. This would
not be difficult to accomplish. On several occasions gentlemen
have offered excellent collections either for gift or for deposit in the
Academy, provided we could give them fair space for display. I
have felt obliged to decline such offers as I knew that with the space
at my command it was not possible to satisfy the reasonable expec-
tations of the donors. :
The additions during the year to the department under my charge
have neither been numerous nor specially important, the most note-
worthy being a collection of Peruvian mummies and crania, pre-
sented by Messrs. G. Y. and W. H. McCracken.
Respectfully submittrd,
D. G. Briyton,
Professor of Ethnology and Archeology.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 429
SUMMARY OF THE REPORT OF WM. C. HENSZEY,
TREASURER,
For THE YEAR Enpinea Noy. 30, 1887.
Dr.
SR OMeU OAL GD BEES Son Mecsa cows seastseutansaeas esceieusaecsshnes $110 00
Se CCOntrIMGtLONS(SENII-ANUUal). ..:5sce0ssa00s spseasencaconanssesee 1589 16
Sereno NCIMDETSH IPSec cs vem sive sa vawtansledsecsncindcs cieutersenseseue 100 00
Pee MISSIONS tO MIUSEWMs..<..222-0 5 cesscasenee <= esse crcsetsveees! 292 95
«« Publication Committee—Sales of Proceedings, Journal,
(31K ace, canon those Oasabbao Canad eacbnopopgngon6dida Coco Ce ER A BCOBONE 504 12
€ Microscopical and Biological Section—Donation......... 50 00
Seeiate LAK. OM WIOMOARESL...Waivcestvscu vorvasaotereveresccesssase 113 10
Pam VIISCellAMCOUStesseemectencensaeosemamece rents soctetes erence es 16 40
pe lc CLUTCHMEESerseaarcctamscacesatetuecrcaseserenendcemercsess cceees 370 75
“« Estate Isaac Lee dec’d., Contribution for Dr. Genth’s
Plt eSreseta den ren eh arent rstses pee suet patton ve seaceseks vatee sk 96 50
SMO UICATE PS OOKSeccvciscosisisescetculscosacssiesccarcesetsscaciveccene 1 25
poeel Mere st OMMlMVEStMENtS ..2c= + ssiccvecnessisvacceccl aeaneass«sens es 2306 83
«* Interest on Money awaiting Investment...............0seee 1097 13
sompivelita loatorae eal MHisCatesstctsh nce sscsees\oucesecacerioer ceases 1859 33
« Wilson Fund, toward Salary of Librarian................00 800 00
«« Investment Fund, amt. transferred.........sscessceeecescseees 4000 00
ee MNSeMmeninds amt. transterredcs.ccssenscccscessssercerece 105 00
$12912 52
Cr.
By Balance overdrawn from last account.........scecssscseeeees $1237 92
See ciel LLCS pm) AMMLOLS «(EC crea ceasao oicecese sccesncianaecadeseccsseceres 38403 56
Printing and Binding Proceedings, etc........-.-+-r0.0-+c-cs< 707 85
SMTi SANG StatONEeKys...nsc2cesoseedecedsoteede=stosckesseees 294 71
PeBING PAIS acca suceeccatectstecs|eseaveeadcerelsasseoudeesiecaaste asses 450 92
Paptslates ANGE NETAVIN OS) caencscwecs sa(dedo ee cicceeesersassseescsacs 242 10
PORE Aen don ainasteesatinevisioee eleesiewaeliotee se sesaese sca apeceercee guagers 94 29
SERBEOSLADE: cas anieswcesls sss cicinntnias aruislse cuss aines asseseaseuviedsenecteeers 180 54
REBAC OA eer wettcce aces vaisessiana ters ussies ciissucawawoasvetiscsedgswaeteese 867 50
pm Cards, rays and BOXES. ..cstne- Seve ceraspanesanesee eres seers 139 08
PeMBLTISTIT AT CO sansa feneonsisss sdoccelsesiacscndsndecwesaccousessaueeisecs 55 00
BaD OOKS oe ccccnes cassrecinesecscsahecsccncs se smetacenessssdaastessusece : 18 00
« State Taxes on Mortgage Investments...........0ce+secssooes 122 85 :
SEMIN VALCIMINEN[S aarreelsjsoeaiiesardocnes tne aeis sensisnaideaine seoeen eseeneee 30 50
See MaSCelAT COUSsssccestssessiensted vesceciescos cceasiwoes secoeessccres 910 88
SEMAN IALSecaddeccsrere set ncset cians Sense desesoneeccrece seensenodereee 29 75
Bee UOUTSINO pS CCIE US:stccactschere ase acescseecesoeecercet nese nce 49 10
Pam eCulne Mees: palG tOMPLOLESSONSH- aceaiseueseee =pcsaceseeece sree 307 27
ae ASCS ial Ge) FAW ETS + scia stssesceee aaase ce cee secrsstecesterence eee 571 25
“« Taxes and Water Rents 1887, Real Estate.......2...0...000 338 85
& Repairs and Expenses, Real Pstate:.......s...2s-----saccorne 1255 04
‘© Life Memberships transferred to Investment Fund........ 100 00
10904 96
IBAA C Oks secccuslecsnscece asi cases tecetoces suceees teste ces $2007 56
430 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
I. V. WILLIAMSON LIBRARY FUND
Investment Pund> amt, transferredscsss>..ccccesccseoonesesesaeceesasdnseeeeeeen $1750 00
BOOKS ccvecctssssimecssswersumensece cass lnsddsoe sededy dnesevedeewadases seek secemnanaem 1516 40
Repairs to. Honsesis2<:yses aesdeevsensqactacsses cbeaueieess sraeceeente eae 889 14
slaxessandeWiatermments eters dscns cacsencees/dosemesesiesenessasaq cartes tess 194 93
BINGING 223s sdeissesenvus senvesees'sdddescorseveassaetensaccnkenaess -seeneeemaa tan 97 95
Collectingrcsscccssesemacesssetcesevenesss ssesesecuncaseceteacosen= sete sesenceeen eens 83 35
‘ $4031 77
Balance perlastystatemlentuanesacessecerssae-oeseesensess saeeemceers $2023 58
Rents! Collected: ../usccs-vssccccacassccceseaduanvetcensneavcirsereseraes 1003 50
Ground Rents: Collected: .222...css.ssessssotassssassecsastetesecnace 697 09
—— _ 3724 17
Balance OVELArA Ws «.e0scse icowaciearescccenssececsrqcscuaepssostsaasenenemes $ 307 60
Balance overdrawn as per last statement........cssse:ecesescsrssececescaseseens $ 147 08
BOOKS? Se ccs.ccesva'sncdceeseacrmacs staat aessenacecioae tre ases spate ccdee terete eeeeeemetne 117 61
BAIN Bs. ncaa es s s'vagedsebeobne aogn as sive siateaeease aes sacesancatns sea eam 18 00
Cash transferred to General Account toward Salary of Librarian,........ 300 00
$ 582 69
ess Income from. Investments:..<...s+cseccosossaccceves cccecneeseocteemenanmaae 525 00
Balance Overdrawil..:ssascacaceseeceoecvele decsieccass eves ccebeene taeeeaeeaane $ 560 00
Balance overdrawn per Jast statement.......sssceccecssserssseseere 99
DISHULSEMENUSy. owssecscdscestedsetnecaterss sresede neces moseduereesboce 271 00
———._ 271 99
Balances cease ssceccicpeswsctescvcctecsins cb see acess eae eeyyeseccscrseaeetare mane $ 288 01
WM. S. VAUX FUND.
Balance per last, statement)... .;;.000<.sebasses0s
Paléontologie Francaise. re Ser. An. Inv. L.10. Terrains Tertiaires, Eocene
Echinides I, f. 16-23, p. 73-108: Terrain Juras. L. 82, 83, 84. Crinoides
f. 10-12, p. 159-170. Ter. Crétaces, L. 23. Wilson Fund.
Peale, A. C.. Department of the Interior. U.S. Geol. Surv. Mineral waters.
1885. 8vo T. Washington 1886. The Author.
Peale, A.C. Wm. H. Seaman M. D., and C. H. White M. D. Report of com-
mittee on methods of stating water-analyses. 8vo T. Washington, 1887.
A. C. Peale,
Pennsylvania. Annual report of the Geological Survey for 1886. 8vo. Harris-
burg, 1887. Charles M. Betts.
Report ofthe Secretary of Internal Affairs, containing reports of the surveys
and re-surveys of the boundary lines of the Commonwealth. 2vols. text
and maps. S8vo. Harrisburg 1887. Charles M. Betts.
State Board of Health and Vital Statistics. First annual report, Dec. 7, 1885.
8vo. Harrisburg, 1886. The Board.
Péres de la Compagnie de Jésus. Memoires concernant Vhistoire naturelle de
Empire Chinois. II. 1. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Pergens, Ed. et A. Meunier. La faune des Bryozoaires Garumniens de Faxe.
Biuxelles, 1886. S8vo. T. The Author.
Pfitzer, E. Entwurf einer natiirlichen Anordnung der Orchideen. 8vo T,
Heidelberg, 1887. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Portugal. Commission des travaux géologiques du Portugal. Recueil d’études
paleomolceidtes sur la faune crétacique du Portugal. I, pp. 1-40. II,
ler, Fasc. Geological Survey of Portugal.
Potts, Edw. Fresh-water sponges. A monograph. 8vo. Philadelphia, 1887.
The Author.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 449
Pres], Carolo Bor. Tentamen pteridographiz. &vo. Prague, 1836.
John H. Redfield.
Procter, John R. Kentucky Geological Survey. Preliminary maps, by J. B. Hoeing,
1886, 1887. Six maps. The Survey.
Putnam, F. W. Conventionalism in ancient American art. Salem 1887. 8vo T.
Serpent Mound Park, Cincinnati. 1887. (Slip.) The Author.
Quain, Jones.’ Elements of anatomy. 9th edition, 2 Vols. 8vo. London, 1882,
I. V. Williamson Fund.
Quatrefages, A.de. Les pygmées. 12mo, Paris, 1887. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Quenstedt, F. A. Die Ammoniten des schwabischen Jura. Heft 13-16. Text
and Atlas. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Rabenhorst, Dr. L. Beitriige zur niheren Kenntniss und Verbreitung der Algen.
H.II. Leipzig, 1866.
Kryptogamen-Flora von Deutschland, Oesterreich und der Schweiz. I, 2e.
Abth. 25, 26, 28 L and Register; III, 9 and 10 L.; IV, 5-7 L.
I. V. Williamson Fund.
Rath, G. vom. Einige geologische Wahrnehmungen in Mexiko. Okt. 1886.
8vo T. Bonn. 1887.
Einige geologische Wahrnehmungen in Griechenland, 1887. 8vo T.
Als Willkommgruss zur Versammlung der deutschen geologischen Gesell-
schaft in Bonn. Einige mineralogische und geologische Mittheilungen.
8vo T.
Worte der Erinnerung an Dr. Martin Websky, 1886. 8vo T.
Friedrich Pfaff, 1887. S8vo T.
Uber kiinstliche Silberkrystalle, 8vo T. 1887, The Author.
Reichenbach, FI. G. L. Flora Saxonica. Die Flora von Sachsen, ein botanisches
Excursionsbuch. 8vo. Dresden und Leipzig, 1842. Thomas Meehan.
Renevier, E. Rapport sur la marche du Musée géologique Vaudois en 1886.
Lausaune, Mai, 1887. Svo J. The Author.
Retzius, Gustaf. Das Gehérorgan der Wirbelthiere, morphologisch-histologische
Studien, I, II. 2 vols. fol. Stockholm, 1881-1884.
I. V. Williamson Fund.
Richon, C. and E. Roze. Atlas des champignons comestibles et vénéneux.
Fasc. 2-7. Fol. Paris. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Ridgway, R. A nomenclature of color for naturalists and compendium of useful
knowledge for ornithologists. S8vo. Bcston, 1886.
A manual of North American birds. 8vo. Philada. 1887.
I. V. Williamson Fund.
Riley, C. V. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Division of Entomology, Bulletin,
No. 10. Our shade trees and their insect defoliators. 8vo IT. Wash-
ington, 1887. The Department.
Rodrigues, J. Barboza. O Tamakoare especies novas da ordem das Ternstroe-
miaceas 4to T. Manaos, {887. The Author.
Rossmassler’s Iconographie der europaischen land und _ susswasser-Mollusken
(icobelt); iN. B. IL.5,.6; IIT, 1,2: I. V. Williamson Fund.
Rothrock, J. T. Biographical memoir of the late Eli K. Price. Nov. 19, 1886.
8vo T. The Author.
Ruiz, H. and J. Pavon. Florz Peruvianae et Chilensis prodromus. Fol. Mad-
rid, 1794. Thomas Meehan.
Russia. Comité Geologique Russe. Bulletin, 1886, Nos. 7-11. 1887, Nos.
1-5. The Survey.
Ryder, John A. On the origin of heterocercy and the evolution of the fin and
fin-rays of fishes. 8vo T. Washington, 1886.
Automatic microtome. Am. Nat. March 1887. 8vo T. The Author.
Saccardo, P. A. Fungi Italici autographice delineati. I, Tab. 1-1120; 11, Tab.
1121-1500. 2 vols, 4to. Patavii 1877-1886.
Michelia, Commentarium mycologicum fungos in primis Italicos illustrans.
I, II, Patavii 1879, 1882. Executors of Dr. Geo. Martin.
Sylloge fungorum. V. Agaricineae, Additamenta ad Vol. I-IV..
I. V. Williamson Fund.
450 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
Sandberger, F. v. Bemerkungen iiber einige Heliceen im Bernstein der preussis-
chen Kiiste. 8vo T. Danzig. The Author.
Sanders, Christ. B. The physical nature of the earth and a new philosophy of
light. S8vo T. Houston, 1887. The Author.
Sarasin, P. and F. Ergebnisse naturwissenschaftlicher Forschungen auf Ceylon
in den Jahren, 1884-1886. I,1; II, 1. Fol. Wiesbaden 1887.
I. V. Williamson Fund.
Saussure,*Henri de. Spicilegia entomologica Genavensis. 2. Tribu des Pam-
phagiens. 4to T. Geneve 1887. The Author, 1887.
Memoires pour servir a ’histoire naturelle du Mexique des Antilles et des
Etats-Unis. re, 2e and 3e. Livr. V Memoire. T. 2, le Partie.
I. V. Williamson Fund.
Mélanges orthopterologiques. ler, 2 and 6me, Fasc.
I. V. Williamson Fund.
Say, Thomas. Portrait in oil of, by C. W. Peale. Mrs. J. E. Mitchell.
Schidte, J.C. Zoologia Danica. 5 H. 1887. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Schkuhr, Christian. Vier und zwanzigste Klasse des linnéischen PAlanzensystems
oder kryptogamische Gewachse. 4to, Wittenberg, 1809 Textand Plates.
John H. Redfield.
Schlechtendal, D. F. L. de. | Adumbratio filicum in Promontorio Bonae Spei
provenientium (1825-1832). 4to. John H. Redfield.
Schomburgh, R. Report on the progress and condition of the Botanic Garden
(South Australia) during the year 1886. Fol. T. _ The Author.
Schmidt, Adolf. Atlas der Diatomaceen-Kunde. Ei. 27, 28.
I. V. Williamson Fund.
Schneider, Anton. Zoologische Beitrage, II, 1. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Schwalbe, G. Lehrbuch der Anatomie der Sinnesorgane. 8vo. Erlangen, 1887.
I. V. Williamson Fund.
Schwedoff, Th. Les mouvements cycloniques. 8vo T. Paris, 1887.
The Author.
Scribner, F. L. Dep. of Agric.. An. Report ]886. Report of the Mycologist.
8vo T: 1887. The Author.
Semper, C. Reisen im Archipel der Philippinen. Wissenschaftlichen Result. IV.
2; V,1; Ber Th. 2Zer Bd. Suppl. H. IV, 2e H. I. V. Williamson Fund,
Seynes, J.de. Recherches jfour servir a l’histoire naturelle des vegetaux inferieurs,
III.. 1886. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Shaler, N. S. Geological Survey of Kentucky. Report of Progress LIT, n.s.
1877. The Survey
Sibthorp, John. Flora Graeca; sive plantarum rariorum historia quas in Provin-
ciis aut Insulis Greecize légit. Ten volumes, folio. London, 1806-1840.
By subscription.
Siemachko, Julien de, Catalogue de la collection de meteorites de. Jan. 1886.
Paris. 8vo T. The Author.
Smith, Eugene Allen. Geological Survey of Alabama. On the Warrior Coal
Field, by Henry McCalley, ‘A. M. 8vo. Montgomery, Alabama. 1886.
The State Geologist.
Solms-Laubach, H. Grafen zu. Einleitung in die Paléophytologie vom botanischen
Standpunkt aus. 8vo. Leipzig, 1887. I. V. Williamson Fund.
South African Museum, Cape of Good Hope. Report of the Trustees. 1886.
The Trustees.
Sowerby, G. B. Thesaurus Conchyliorum. XI, IV. Wilson Fund.
Stadler, S. Beitrige zur Kenntniss der Nectarien und Biologie der Bliithen. 8vo.
Berlin, 1886. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Stephenson, F. B.. M. D. . A summary of Holsti’s views of arterio-capillary
Sclerosis. Nov.20, 1886. S8vo, T. The Author.
Stevenson, John. Hymenomycetes Britannici. British fungi (Hymenomycetes).
Vols. 1 and 2. 8vo. Edinburgh, 1887. I. V. Williamson Fund,
Stossich, M. I distomi dei pesci marini e d’acqua dolce. 1886. 8vo T.
The Author.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 451
Surgeon-General’s Office, U.S. Army. Index-catalogue of the library, Vol. VIII.
‘ War Department.
Suringar. Musée botanique de Leide. I, 4and 5; II pp. i-viii, 1-16, Pls 7-9.
I. V. Willitmso Fund.
Sutro, Theodore. The Sutro Tunnel Company. 12 mo. New York, 1887.
The Author.
Swartz, Olai.’ Synopsis filicum. 12mo. Kiliae 1806. John H. Redfield.
Sydow, P. Die Flechten Deutschlands. 8vo. Berlin 1887. 2
I. V. Williamson Fund.
Szabo, Jozsef. Geologia kivlaé tekintettel a Petrografiara Vulkanossagra és hidro-
grafiara. S8vo. Budapest, 1883. Angelo Heiprin.
Taschenberg, O. Bibliotheca zoologica. II, 1-3. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Taylor, Tbos. Reply to “Science.” Relating to the crystals of butter, animal
fats and oleomargarine. Nov. 19,1886. 8vo T. ' The Author.
Teall, J. J. Harris. British petrography, Parts 9 and 10. Birmingham.
I. V. Williamson Fund.
Thaxter, Roland. On certain cultures of gymnosporangium, with notes on their
roesteliz. Dec. 8, 1886. Svo T. The Author.
Thompson, Edw. H. Archzeological researches in Yucatan. 8vo T. Worcester.
1886. The Author.
Thomson, Sir C. Wyville. Report of the scientific results of the voyage of
H. M. S. Challenger during the years 1874-1876. Zoology XX; XXI,
text and plates; XXII. H. B. M. Government.
Thore, J. re, 2me and 8me communication sur une nouelle force? Dax,
1887. 8vo T. The Author.
Torrey, John, Card portrait of. Through the Botanical Section.
Towne, Edward C. Electricity and life. Cambridge, 1887. 8vo T.
The Author.
Trask, Dr. John B. Report on the geology of the Coast Mountains and part of
the Sierra Nevada. 1854. 8vo. T. In Exchange.
Tryon, Geo. W.-Jr. Manual of conchology, structural and systematic. Parts
83-35. Second series, Pulmonata, Parts 9-11. The Author.
Tuckerman, Frederick. The tongue and gustatory organs of Mephitis mephitica.
8vo T. Aug. 1887. The Author.
Tyson, Philip T. Geology and industrial resources of California. 8vo. Balti-
more, 1851. in Exchange.
Uhlworm, Oscar and F. H. Haenlein. Bibliotheca botanica. H. 2-8.
I. V. Williamson Fund.
United States Bureau of Ethnology. Annual report, 1882-83.
The Director.
Commission of Fish and Fisheries. Parts XII and XIII. Reports for
1884 and 1885. The Commission.
Commissioner of Patents. Reports for the years 1849-50), 1850-51, 1851-52,
1852-53, 1859, 1861. Agriculture. 8vo. Washington 1850-1862.
In Exchange.
Department of Agriculture. Reports of Commissioner, 1875 and 1876. 8vo.
Washington, 1877. Botanical Division. Bulletin, Nos. 3 and 1}. Division
of Entomology, Bulletin, Nos. 10, 13-16 inclusive. Dr. C. V. Riley.
The Department.
Department of the Interior. Census Office. Tenth census of the United
States. Vol. XV, XVI, XVIII. 4to. Washington 1886.
Department of the Interior.
Commissioner of Education. Report for the year 1884-1885. Circulars of
information, 1886, No. 2. The Department.
Commissioner of Labor’s second annual report, 1886. Convict labor. 8vo.
Washington, 1887. The Department.
U. S. Geological Survey, Monograph. Vols. X and XI. Sixth annual
report, 1884-85. Mineral resources of the United States, 1885. Bulletin
Nos. 30-39 inc. The Department.
452 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF | [1887.
Department of State. Reports from the Consuls. Nos. 75-85 and report of
forestry in Europe. The Department.
Treasury Department. Bureau of Statistics, quarterly report. | Nos. I-4,
1886-87. Annual report for the year ending June 30, 1886, No. 9.
The Department.
Coast and Geodetic Survey, report of the superintendent showing the progress
of the work during the fiscal year ending with June 1885. 4to. Washing-
ton, 1886.
Commissioner of Navigation, report of, to the Secretary of the Treasury.
1886. 8vo. The Department.
War Department. Annual report of the Chief of Ordnance, June 30, 1886.
8vo. Washington, 1886. The Department.
Vasey, George. Dep. of Agriculture. Report of the Botanist for 1886. 8vo T.
Washington, 1887. The Author.
Vejdovsky, Franz. System und Morphologie der Oligochaeten. Fol. Prag,:
1884. J. V. Williamson Fund.
Ventenat, E. P. Jardin de la Malmaison. Livr’s le.—l6e. Folio. Paris, 1803,
1804. Thomas Meehan.
Vogt, Carl and Emile Young. Traité d’anatomie comparée pratique. 8e—10e.
: I. V. Williamson Fund.
Volkens, George. Die Flora der zegyptisch—-orabischen Wiiste auf Grundlage
anatomisch—physiologischer Forschungen. 4to. Berlin, 1887.
I. V. Williamson Fund.
Wagner, Franz von. Das Nervensystem von Myzostoma (F. S. Leuckart). 8vo
T. Graz, 1886. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Watson, Sereno, Card portrait of. Through the Botanical Section.
Contributions to American botany, XIV. The Author.
Webb, Philip Barker. Iter Hispaniense or a synopsis of plants collected in the
southern provinces of Spain and Portugal. 8vo T. Paris, 1838.
T: Garuel:
Weber, Max. Studien iiber Saugethiere. Svo. Jena, 1886.
I. V. Williamson Fund.
Weihe A und Ch. G. Nees von Esenbeck. Die deutschen Brombeerstrauche,
hescreiben und dargestellt. Folio. Bonnae, 1822. Thomas Meehan.
Wells, John Grant. A Catalogue of the birds of Grenada, West Indies, with ob-
servations thereon. 1887. 8vo T. The Author.
Westerlund, Carl Agardh. Fauna der in paldarctischen Region lebenden Binnen-
conchylien. III, VI. 8vo. Lund, 1886. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Wharton, Francis. A digest of the international law of the United States.
8 Vols. 8vo. Washington, 1886. The Author.
Whiteaves, J. F. On some marine invertebrata dredged or otherwise collected by
Dr. G. M. Dawson in 1885, on the coast of British Columbia. 4to. T.
Montreal, 1887. The Author.
Whitman, Charles O. Methods of research in microscopical anatomy and em-
bryology. S8vo. Boston, 1885. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Whitney, J. D. Letter of the State Geologist (California) relative to progress,
1866-7. 8vo T. Sacramento, 1867. In Exchange.
Widhalm, J. Die fossilen Vogel-Knochen der Odessar-Steppen- Kalt-Steinbriiche
an der neuen Slobvdka bei Odessa. (Beilage z. X Bd. Schrift. d. neurus.
Gesell. der Naturf. zu Odessa). 1886. 4to T. The Society.
Wiedersheim, R. Der Bau des Menschen als Zeugniss fiir seine Vergangenheit.
8vo. Freiburg i.B., 1887. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Wigand, Albert. Botanisches Heft, 2es. H. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Wight, Robert. Illustrations of Indian botany. 2 vols. 4to. Madras, 1840.
I. V. Williamson Fund.
Wolle, Rev. Francis. Fresh-water algz of the United States. 2 vols. 8vo.
Bethlehem, 1887. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Yale University, Catalogue 1886-87. The University.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 453
Zetetic Society. Chart and compass, sextant and sun-dial etc.? 8vo. London,
n. d. The Society.
Zoologisches Station von Neapel. Fauna und Flora des Golfes von Neapel.
Monogr. XIV. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Zuckerkandl, E. Das Periphere Geruchsorgan der Saugethiere. Svo. Stuttgart,
1887. I. V. Williamson Fund.
JOURNALS AND PERIODICALS.
Albany. Albany Institute. Transactions XI. The Society.
New York State Library. 67th, 68th and 69th reports. The Trustees.
New York State Museum of Natural History. 32nd, 88th and 389th aunnal
reports. The Trustees.
Regents of the Uuiversity of the State of New York. 9th annual report and
Historical Record. The Trustees.
Amiens. Société Linnéenne du Nord de la France. Bulletin, VII, 139-VIII, 174.
Memoires, VI. The Society.
Amsterdam. K. Akademie van Wettenschappen. Jaarboek, 1885. Verslagen en
Mededeelingen, Afdeeling Natuurkunde, III,2; Afdeeling Letterkunde,
III, 3. Verhandelingen, XXV. The Society.
Angers. Société d’Etudes scientifiques. Bulletin, XIV, Suppl; XV. The Society.
- Société Nationale d’ Agriculture, Sciences et Arts. Mémoires, T. 28.
The Society.
Anvers. Société Royale de Géographie. Bulletin, XI,4—-XII,1. The Society.
Auch. Société Francaise de Botanique. Revue de Botanique, Nos. 49-59.
The Society.
Auxerre. Société des Sciences historiques et naturelles del’Yonne. Bulletin, XL.
The Society.
Baltimore. American Chemical Journal, VIII, 6—IX, 5. The Editor.
American Journal of Mathematics, IX, 1—X, 1. The Editor.
American Journal of Psychology (Hall) I, 1. The Editor.
Johns Hopkins University. Studies from the Biological Laboratory, III, 9;
IV, 1,2. Circulars Nos. 54-59. Annual report, 11th. |The University,
Peabody Institute, 20th annual report. Tse Society.
Basel. Naturforschende Gesellschaft. Verhandlungen, VIII, 1. The Society.
Schweizerische palaontologische Gesellschaft. Abhandlungen, XIII.
I. V. Williamson Fund.
Batavia. Natuurkundig Vereen in Nederlandsch Indie. Natuurkundig Tijdschrift
voor Nederlandisch Indie, 8e Ser. VII, 1, 3, 4; VIII, 1. The Society.
Bath. Postal Microscopical Society. Journal of Microscopy and Natural Science,
IY 5 Al PR dae Tne Editor.
Belfast. Natural History and Philosophical Society. Proceedings 1885-86.
The Society.
Naturalists’ Field Club. Annual report, II, 6. The Society.
Berkeley. University of California. Register, 1886-87. The Trustees.
Berlin. K. Akademie der Wissenschaften. Abhandlungen, physikalisches, 1886.
Sitzungsberichte, 1887, 1—LIII. The Society.
Archiv fiir Naturgeschichte, XLI, 6; LII, I, 2, 5. The Editor.
Botanischer Jahresbericht (Just) XI, 2 Abth. 8 H.; XII, 1 Abth.vH.; 2
Abth. 2 H. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Botanischer Verein der Provinz Brandenburg. Verhandlungen X—XIII;
XV-XXVII; XXVIII, 1868-1886. The Society.
Entomologischer Verein. Deutsche entomologische Zeitschrift, XXX, 2;
(Berliner) XXXI. 1. The Society.
Deutscher Fischerei-Verein. Circular, 1886, No. 5-1887, No. 3. Mitthei-
lungen 1886, No. 10-1887, No. 5. The Society.
Gartenflora. 1886, 4, 8, 10-24. Thomas Meehan.
454 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
Deutsche geologische Gesellschaft. Zeitschrift XXXVIII, 3-XXXIX, 1.
Katalag der Bibliothek, April 1887. The Society.
K. P. geologische Landesanstalt und Bergakademie. Jahrbuch, 1885.
The Society.
Gesellschaft Naturforschender Freunde. Sitzungs-Bericht, 1886, No. 9-1887,
No. 8. The Society.
Jahrbucher fiir wissenschaftliche Botanik. XVII, 4-XVII, 3.
I. V. Williamson Fund.
Naturze Novitates. 1886, No. 23-1887, No. 21. The Publisher,
Berm. Naturforschende Gesellschaft. Mittheilungen 1148-1168. The Society.
Besancon. Académie des Sciences, Belles-Lettres et Arts. 1885, The Society.
Birmingham Philosophical Society. Proceedings, V. 1. The Society.
Bistritz. Gewerbeschule. Jahresbericht, 1 2er. The Director.
Bologna. Accademia delle Scienze. Memorie, 4e Ser. VI. The Society.
Bonn. Archiv f. d. gesammte Physiologie etc. (Pfliiger). I, 1868—XLI, and In-
dex I-XXX.
Archiy fiir mikroskopische Anatomie, XXVIII, 3-XXX, 3. ,
I. V. Williamson Fund.
Naturhistorischer Verein. Verhandlungen XLIII, 2. The Society.
Bordeaux. Société Linnéenne. Actes, XX XIX. The Society.
Boston. American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Proceedings XXII, 1 and 2.
Memoirs XI, Part IV, No. 5. The Society.
Journal of Morphology, I, 1. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Society of Natural History. Proceedings, XXIII, pp., 305-368. The Society,
Braunschweig. Archiv fiir Anthropologie XVI, 4; XVII,1,2. |
I. V. Williamson Fund.
Naturwissenschaftliche Rundschau I, 51-II, 50. The Editor,
Zeitschrift fiir wissenschaftliche Mikroscopie III, 38-IV, 2.
I. V. Williamson Fund.
Bremen. Naturwissenschaftliche Verein. Abhandlungen IX, 4. The Society.
Brescia. Ateneo. Commentari, 1886. The Society.
Brooklyn. Entomologia Americana. II, 9-III, 7. The Editor.
Library. Annual report, 29th. The Librarian.
Briinn. K. K.mahrisch-schlesische Gesellschaft zur Beforderung des Ackerbaues,
der Natur-und Landes-kunde. Mittheilungen, 1886. The Society.
Naturforschender Verein. Verhandlungen XXIV,1,2. Bericht der meteor-
ologischen Commission, 1884. The Society.
Bruxelles. Académie Royale des Sciences, des Lettres et des Beaux Arts de
Belgique. . Memoires couronnes, 4to T. 47 and 48. Mem. Cour. 8vo T. 37,
38, 39. Memoires, T. 46. Notices Biographique etc., 1886. Catalogue
des Livres de la Bibliothéque. lre Partie; Ye Partie, Lettres, Sciences.
Bulletin, 3e Ser., XI, 7-XIII, 10. Annuaire, 1887. The Society.
Musée Royale d’ Histoire Naturelle de Belgique. Bulletin IV, 4. The Society.
Société Royale de Botanique. Bulletin, XXV, 2. The Society.
Société Entomologique de Belgique. Annales, XXX, Compte-Rendu. Ser.
III, 72-90. The Society.
Société Belge de Geographie. Bulletin, X, 2-XI, 4. The Society.
Société Malacologique. Annales XXI. Procés Verbaux, 8 Jan—3 Juil., 7
Aout—4 Dec. 1887. The Society.
Société Belge de Microscopie. Bulletin XII, 11; XIII, 2-11. The Society.
Budapest. Magyar Tudomanyos Akadémia. Archzeologiai Ertesité, V, 3-5; VI.
1,2. Ertekezesek a mathematikai Tudomanyok Ké6rébol, XI, 10—XII, 11.
Ertekezesek a Termeszettudomanyok Kérébél, XIV, 9; XV, 1, 3-18.
Mathematikai es Termeszettudomanyi Kézlemenyek vonatkozolog a hazai
Viszonyokra XX, 1, 3-5; XXI,1. Mathem es Termesz. Ertesité, III,
6-IV, 6. Mathem. u Naturw. Berichte aus Ungarn, III. The Society.
Ungarisches National-Museum Termeszetrajzi, Fuzetek. X, 4; XI, 4. Vezeték,
1877-1886. The Director.
»,
1887. | NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 455
Buenos Aires. Sociedad Cientifica Argentina. « Anales ¥XII, 4-XXITV, 1.
Sociedad Geografica Argentina. Revista, No. 42-50. The Society.
Caen. Académie nationale des Sciences, Arts et Belles-Lettres.. Memoires, 1886.
The Society.
Calcutta: Asiatic Society of Bengal. Journal LV, Pts. 2, Nos.3and.4. Proceed-
ings, 1886 Nos. 8 and 9; 1887, Nos. 1-3-5. The Society.
Cambridge. Appalachian Mountain Club. AppalachiaIV, 4. Register, 1887.
The Society.
Harvard University. Library Bulletin, Nos. 36-38. Bibliographical Con-
tributions, 25. The University.
Museum of Comparative Zoology. Bulletin XIII, 1-5. Memoires XVI, 1,
2. Report 1885-86; 1886-87. The Director.
Peabody Museum of American Archeology and Ethnology. 20th Annual
report. The Director,
Cambridge, England, University. Studies from the Morphological Labratory, II,
AB MMe The University.
Canada, Royal Society of. Proceediggs and Transactions, IV. The Society.
Cap Rouge. Le Naturaliste Canadien, XVI, 7-XVII, 5. The Editor,
Cardiff. Cardiff Naturalists’ Society. Report and Transactions, XVIII.
Hi The Society.
Catania. Accademia Gioenia di,Scienze Naturali. Atti, 3a Ser. XIX. Addunanza
del 17 Ottob, 1887. The Society.
Cassel. Malakozoologische Blatter, IX, 2; X, 1. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Verein fiir Naturkunde. 82er and 33ef Bericht. The Society.
Cedar Rapids. Iowa Agricnltural College. Bulletin, Nov. 1886. The College.
Champaign. Illinois State Laboratory of Natural History. Bulletin, II, 6.
The Director,
Charleston. Elliot Society of Science and Art. Proceedings, II, pp. 81-120.
The Society.
Chicago. Chicago Public Library. 15th Annual report. The Librarian.
The Open Court. I. 1, 2, 4. The Editor.
Ridgway Ornithological Club. Bulletin Nos. 1 and 2. The Society.
American Antiquarian, VII, 1; IX, 1-5. The Editor.
Christiania. Archiv for Mathematik og Naturvidenskab. XII, 1. The Editor.
Videnskab-Selskab. Forhandlinger, 1886. The Society.
Chur. Naturforschende Gesellschaft. Jahresbericht XXIX. The Society.
Cincinnati. Society of Natural History. Journal, IX, 4—X, 3. TheSociety.
Copenhagen. Botaniske Forening. Meddelelser II, t. Botaniske Tidsskrift,
XV, 4e-XVI, 3. ¢ 7) he Society:
Naturhistoriske Forening. Videnskabelige Meddelelser, 1884-86.
The Society.
K. D. Videnskabernes Selskab. Oversigt 1886. No. 2; 1887, 1. Skrifter,
i IS NI, Abe WOE Ge The Society.
Corboda. Academia nacional de Ciencias exactas. Boletin, IX, 1, 2,4. Actas.
Wee The Society.
Crawfordsville. Botanical Gazette. XI, 12—XII, 11. The Editor.
Danzig. Naturforschende Gesellschaft. Schriften. N. F. VI, 4. The Society.
Darmstadt. Verein fiir Erdkunde. Notizblatt, 8e Folge, IV, 7. The Society,
Denver. Colorado Scientific Society. Proceedings, II, 2. The Society.
Detroit. The Microscope, VII, 1. The Editor.
Dorpat. Naturforscher Gesellschaft. Sitzungsberichte VIII, 1. Archiv fiir die
Naturkunde Liv-Ehst-und Kurlands Ye Ser., IX, 4.
Dresden. K. mineralogisch-geologisches und preehistorisches Museum. Mitt-
heilungen No. 7. The Director.
Naturwissenschaftliche Gesellschaft Isis. Sitzungsberichte und Abhandlungen,
1886, Juli-Dec.; 1887. Jan—Juni. The Society.
Dublin. Royal Geological Society of Ireland. Journal XVIII, 1. The Society.,
Royal Dublin Society Proceedings, N. S. V, 3, 4, 5, 6.; Transactions, Ser,
II, Vol. III, 11-13. The Society.
456 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
Royal Irish Academy. Proceedings, Science, Ser. II, Vol. 4, No. 5; Polite
Literature and Antiquities, Ser. II, Vol. 2, No.7. Transactions, Science,
XXVIII, 21-25; Polite Literature and Antiquities, XX VII, 6, 7, 8;
Cunningham Memoirs, II, III. ; The Society.
Science and Art Museum. Report of Director. 1887. The Society.
Dunedin, N. Z. New Zealand Journal of Science, I, 2. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Edinburgh. Botanical Society. Transactions and Proceedings XVI, 3.
The Society.
Geological Society. Transactions, V, 2, 3 and Catalogue of the Library.
The Society.
Royal Physical Society. Proceedings, 1885-86. The Society.
Elberfeld. Naturwissenschaftliche Verein. Jahres-Berichte, 7es H. The Society.
Emden. WNaturforschende Gesellschaft. Jahresbericht, 71 er. The Society.
Erfurt. K. Akademie gemeinutziger Wissenschaften. Jahrbucher, n. F. H. 14.
The Society.
Erlangen. Biologisches Centralblatt. VI, 18-VII,17. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Physikalisch-medicinische Societat. Sitzungsberichte H. 18. The Society.
Florence. Biblioteca nazionale central. Bolletino, 1886, Nos. 22-45.
The Librarian.
Nuovo Giornale Botanico Italiano. (Caruel.) XIX, 1-4. The Editor.
Societa Entomologica Italiana. Bolletino, XVIII, 4; XIX, 1, 2.
The Society.
Societa Italiana di Antropologia, Etnologia e Psicologia comparata. Archivio,
DNALS BS Sis OVINE Ihe The Society.
Folkestone. Natural History Society. Oct. 1886—June, 1887. The Society.
Frankfurt a/M. Deutsche malakozoologische Gesellschaft. Jahrbiicher, XIII, 4—
XIV, 38-1887, No. 10. Nachrichtsblatt, 1886, No. 11. The Society.
Frankfurter Verein fiir Geographie und Statistik. Jahresbericht, Jahrg. L.
Beitrage zur Statistik V, 1. The Society.
Physikalischer Verein. Jahresbericht, 1884-85; 1885-86. The Society.
Senckenbergische Naturforschende Gesellschaft. Bericht 1886, 1887. Ab-
handlungen XIV, 2, 38. The Society.
Frankfurt a/O -Naturwissenschaftlicher Verein. Monatliche Mittheilungen, IV.
1-10. The Society.
Societatum Litterae. 1887. Nos. 1-10. The Editor.
Freiburg, i. B. Naturforschende Gesellschaft. Berichte I, The Society.
Gand. Archives de Biologie. Van Beneden and Van Bambeke, VI, 3, 4.
I. V. Williamson Fund.
Geneva. Institut National Genevois. Memoires, XVI. The Society.
Recueil Zoologique Suisse (Fol) IV, 1-3. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Genoa. Societa di Letture e Conversazione Scientifiche. Giornale, IX, 9, 11, 12;
X, le Sem. 8, 4. The Society.
Giessen. Jahresbericht iiber die Fortschritte der Chemie. (Fittica). 1884, No.
4-1885, No. 3. The Editor.
Oberhesische Gesellschaft fiir Natur-und Heilkunde, 25er Bericht.
The Society.
Glasgow. Natural History Society. Proceedings, n. s. I, 3.
Philosophical Society. Proceedings, X VII. The Society.
GOrlitz. Naturforschende Gesellschaft. Abhandlungen, XIX. The Society.
Oberlausitziche Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften. Neues lausitziches Magazin,
LXII, 2; LXIII, 1. The Society.
Golden, Colorado. State Board of Mines. Biennial report, 1886. The Director.
Gotha. Dr. A. Peterman’s Mitteilungen aus Justus Perthe’s geograpischer An-
stalt XXXII, 11-X XXIII, 10. Erganzungsheft No. 84-87. Inhaltsverzeich-
niss, 1875-84. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Granville, Ohio. Denison University. Bulletin of the Scientific Laboratories, II,
ee The Trustees.
s’Gravenhage. De Nederlandsche entomologische Vereeniging. Tijdschrift voor
Entomologie, XXIX. 3 H.-XXX, 1. The Society.
1887.) NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA, 457
Graz. Botanisches Institute (Leitgeb). Mittheilungen H. 1.
I. V. Williamson Fund.
Naturwissenschafiliche Verein fiir Steiermark. Mittheilungen, 1886.
Verein der Arzte in Steiermark. Mittheilungen, 1886.
Zoologisches Institut. Arbeiten I, 2-IT, 2. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Groningen. Natuurkundige Genootschap. Verslag, 1886. The Society.
.Giistrow. Verein der Freunde der Naturgeschichte in Mecklenberg. Archiv XL.
1886. The Society.
Halifax. Nova Scotian Institute of Natural Sciences. Proceedings and Transac-
tions. VI, 4. The Society.
‘Halle. Naturforschende Gesellschaft. Abhandlungen, XVI, 4. Bericht, 1885,
886.
Halle a/S. Verein fiir Erdkunde. Mittheilungen, 1886. The Society.
Zeitschrift fiir Naturwissenschaften, 4e F. V, 83—VI, 1. The Editor.
Hamburg. Naturhistorisches Museum. Bericht, 1885. The Director.
Naturwissenschaftlicher Verein. Abhandlungen, IX, 1, 2. The Society.
Musée Teyler. Archives, 2nd Ser. II, 4. Catalogue de la Bibliotheque III,
and IV.
Société Hollandaise des Sciences. Archives XXI,2-5; XXII, 1. Verhand-
lungen, 3e Verz. IV. 4. The Society.
Helsingfors. Finska Vetenskaps-Societeten. Ofversigt XXVII. Observations
Metéorologiques 1882, 1883. The Society.
Hermannstadt. Siebenbiirgischer Verein fiir Naturwissenschaften. Verhandlungen
und Mittheilungen XXXVII. Archiv. XXI,1. Jahresbericht, 1885-6.
The Society.
Iowa City. State Historical Society. Jowa Historical Record, Jan.—Oct., 1887.
The Society.
Jena. Anatomischer Anzeiger. II, 16-23. The Editor.
Medicinisch-naturwissenschaftliche Gesellschaft. Zeitschrift XX, 1-XXI, 2.
: The Society.
Zoologische Jahrbiicher. II, 1-4. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Kharkow. Société des Naturalistes 4 l’ Université impériale. Travaux, XX.
The Society.
Klagenfurt. | Landesmuseum, Diagramme der magn. u. meteor. Beobachtungen,
1885-1886. Jahrbuch, 18. Bericht, 1885. Carinthia, 1886, No. 12-
- 1887, No. 10. The Society.
Konigsberg. Physikalisch-dkonomische Gesellschaft. Schriften, XX VII.
Landshut. Botanischer Verein. Bericht, 1886-87. The Society.
Lausanne. Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles. Bulletin, 94, 95.
Leeds. Journal of Conchology. V, 4. 5, 6. The Editor.
Philosophical and Literary Society. Annual report, 1886-7. The Society.
Yorkshire Geological and Polytechnic Society. Proceedings, N. S. IX, 2.
The Society.
Yorkshire Naturalists’ Union. Transactions, IX, 1884. The Society,
Leyden. Museum, Notes (Jentink) VIII, 1-4. The Editor.
Nederlandsche Dierkundige Vereeniging. ‘Tijdschrift, 2e Ser. I, 4.
The Society.
Leipzig. Archiv f. Anatomie und Physiologie. Anat. Abth. 1886, Nos. 5 and
6; 1887, 1-3. Physiol. Abth. 1886; Suppl. Bd. 1887, 1-4.
Botanische Institut zu Tiibingen. Untersuchungen II, 2.
I. V. Williamson Fund.
Botanische Jahrbiicher (Engler) VIII, 2-5; IX, 1.
Botanische Zeitung. XLV, 4-6; XLIV, 1-3. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Jahresberichte ii. d. Fortschritte der Anatomie und Physiologie. 14er Bd. IT,
Abth. 1. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Journal fiir Ornithologie, XXXIV, 2-XXXV, 2. I. V. Williamson Fund.
K. sachsische Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften. Adhandlungen XIII, 6-9.
Bericht, 1886, I—IV, Suppl. The Society.
Morphologisches Jahrbuch, XII, 3—XIII, 1. I. V. Williamson Fund.
30 ;
458 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
Verein fiir Erdkunde. Mittheilungen, 1885. The Society.
Zeitschrift fiir Krystallographie und Mineralogie. Groth. XII, 4-XIII, 4.
I. V. Williamson Fund.
Zeitschrift fiir wissenschaftliche Zoologie, XLIV, 3-XLV, 4.
I. V. Williamson Fund.
Zoologische Station, Zoologischer Jahresbericht, 1885, 1, IV.
I. V. Williamson Fund.
Zoologischer Anzeiger, Nos. 237-264. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Liege. Société Royale des Sciences.. Memoires, XIII. The Society.
Lille. Société Géologique du Nord. Annales, XIII. The Society.
Lisbon. Associacao dos Engenheiros Civis Portugueses. Revista de Obras publi-
cas e Minas. 195-214. The Society.
La Revue du Portugal et de ses Colonies 1887, Jan. Feb. The Editor.
Liverpool. Free Public Library, Museum and Walker Art Gallery. 34th annual
report. The Trustees.
Geological Society. Proceedings, V, 3. The Society.
Literary and Philosophical Society. Proceedings, Vols. 39 and 40).
The Society.
Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 5th Ser. Nos. 108-119.
I. V. Williamson Fund.
Anthropological Institute. Journal XVI, 8—XVII, 2. The Society.
Astronomical Register, No. 288. I. V. Williamson Fund.
British Association for the Advancement of Science. Report 55th and 56th
Meetings. I. V. Williamson Fund.
‘Chemical Society, Abstract of Proceedings. Nos. 28-42. Journal 289-299.
The Society.
Curtis’s Botanical Magazine. Nos. 1198-1209. I. V. Williamson Fund.
‘The Earth. Nos. 4-6, 8-10. 12, 13, 17. The Editor.
The Electrician XVII, XIX, 28. The Editor.
Entomological Society. Transactions, 1886. No. 4-1887, No. 3. The Society.
Gardeners’ Chronicle, 2nd Ser. No. 674—8rd Ser. I, 47. The Editor.
Geological Magazine. Nos. 270-281. I. V. Williamson Fund.
‘Geological Society. Quarterly Journal. Nos. 168-171; List, 1885.
The Society.
Geologists’ Association. Proceedings IX, 7,8; X, I and 2. The Society.
Grevillea (Cooke). I—XIV, 1880-86, XV, 73-77.
; Executors of Dr. Geo. Martin.
Hardwicke’s Science Gossip. No. 264-275. I. V. Williamson Fund.
The Ibis. 5th Ser. II, 17-20. {. V. Williamson Fund.
Journal of Botany, British and Foreign. Nos. 288-299.
Journal of Physiology. VIII, 1-5. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Knowledge IX, 9-12; X, 13-25. The Editor.
Linnean Society Journal. Botany 140, 145-149, 151, 158; Zoology, 114—
117, 126-129. Proceedings, Oct. 1886, July, 1887. Transactions, 2nd
Series; Zoology IV, 1,2; Botany II, 9-14. List, 1886-1887.
The Society:
London, Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine. 5th Series, Nos.
139-150. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Mineralogical Magazine,
Nos. 33 and 34. I. V. Williamson Fund.
‘The Naturalist, Nos. 137-148. The Editor.
Nature, Nos. 891-942. The Editor.
Paleontographical Society. Publications, Vol. VL. Wilson Fund.
Physical Society. Proceedings VIII, 8; IX, 1. ; The Society.
Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science. 5th Series No. 107; N.S. No.
109. I. V. Williamson Fund, .
Queckett Microscopical Club. Journal Nos. 36-48; II Ser. Nos 1-19; Gen.
Index. I-VI; Catalogue of microscopical preparations ; Catalogue of books,
The Society.
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 459
London. Royal Institution of Great Britain Proceedings XI, 3. List, 1886.
The Society.
Royal. Proceedings, Nos. 248-258. Philosophical Transactions, 177, Parts 1
and 2. List, 30th, Nov. 1886. .
Royal Geographical Society. Proceedings, n. s. VIII, 12-IX, 11.
The Society.
Royal Microscopical Society. Journal VI, 2nd Ser. 6a; 1887, 1-4.
The Society.
Scientific Enquirer, II, 1-2. The Editor.
London Society of Arts. Journal, XXXIV. The Society.
Triibner’s American and Oriental Literary Record. Nos. 229-234.
The Publishers.
Zoological Record. 1885. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Zoological Society. Proceedings, 1886 No. 4-1887, No. 3. Transactions
XII, 4, 5, 6. The Society.
Zoologist. 3rd Ser. Nos. 120-131. The Editor.
London, Ca. Canadian Entomologist. XVIII, 10-XIX, 11. The Editor.
Louvain. University Catholique. Liber Memorialis, 1834-1884. Choix de
Mémoires, XIII. Annuaire XLI. Thirteen theses. The Society.
Liibeck. Naturhistorische Museum. Jahresbericht, 1885, 1886. The Society.
Liineburg. Naturwissenschaftlicher Verein. Jahreshefte, X. The Society.
Lund. University. Acta. XXII. The University.
Luxembourg. Institut Royal. Publications XX. The Society.
Madrid. R. Academia de Ciencias exactas, fisicas y naturales. Memorias XI.
Revista, XXII, 2, 3. The Society.
Sociedad Geografica. Boletin, XXI, 3-6; XXII, 3-6? The Society.
Magdeburg. Naturwissenschaftlicher Verein. Jahresbericht u. Abhandlungen,
1886. The Society.
Malton. Malton Field Naturalists’ and Scientific Society. 3rd Annual Report.
The Society.
Manchester. Geological Society. Transactions, XIX, 2-10. The Society.
Microscopical Society. Transactions 1886. The Society.
Scientific Students’ Association. " Annual report, 1885, 1886. The Society.
Meriden, Conn. Scientific Association. Transactions II. The Society.
Metz. Société d’ Histoire Naturelle. Bulletin, 2e Ser. 16 and 17 Cah.
The Society.
Verein fiir Erdkunde, Yer Jahresbericht. The Society.
Mexico. Museo Nacional. Anales, III, 10,11; IV, 1. The Director.
Sociedad Cientifica “Antonio Alzate.”” Memorias, I, 2-4. The Society.
Sociedad de Geografia y Estadistica. Boletin VI, 4-9. The Society.
Sociedad Mexicana de Historia Natural. La Naturaleza, VII, 16-24; 2d
mera lawl. The Society.
Middelburg. "Zeeuwsch Genootschap der Wetenschappen. Archief VI, 2.
The, Society.
Middleton, Wesleyan University. Report, 15th. The Society.
Milan. R. Istituto Lombardo di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti. Rendiconti, Ser. II;
XIX, 12,—XX, 18? The Society.
Modena. Societa dei Naturalisti. Atti, Ser. III, Vol. III, pp. 1-48; Vol. IV.
The Society.
Mons. Société des Science, des Arts et des Lettres du Hanaut. Mémoires et
Publications IVme Ser. T. 9me. The Society.
Montreal. Canadian Record of Science, II, 5-8. The Editor.
Moscow. Société Impériale des Naturalistes. Bulletin, 1886, 2-4: Beilage, I,
XII. The Society.
Miinster. Westfalischer Provinzial-Verein fur Wissénschaft und Kunst. Jahres-
bericht, 14er. The Society.
Munich. Gesellschaft fiir Anthropologie, Ethnologie und Urgeschichte. Beitrage,
VII, 3-4. The Society.
Zeitschrift fiir Biologie, XXIII, 3-XXIV, 1. I. V. Williamson Fund.
460 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
Nancy. Société des Sciences. Bulletin, Serie 2me, III, 19. The Society.
Naples, R. Accademia delle Scienze fisiche e matematiche, XXV, 4-12.
R. Istituto d’Incoraggiamento alle Scienze Naturali economiche e technolo-
PIGHEW PAtte en nSemN Ve The Society.
Zoologische Station. Mitthelungen VII, 1,2. Zoologischer. Jahresbericht,
1885, II. The Director.
Neuchatel Société des Sciences Naturelles. Bulletin, XV. The Society.
Newcastle-upon-Tyne. Natural History Society of Northumberland, Durham and
Newcastle upon-Tyne. Transactions, VIII, 2; IX, 1. The Society.
New Haven. Connecticut Academy. Transactions VII, 1. The Society.
The American Journal of Science No’s, 193-203. The Editor.
New York. Academy of Sciences. Annals, III, 12; IV, 1,2. Transactions IV,
V, 7 and 8. The Society.
Astor library, annual report, 88th. The Trustees.
The Auk, IX, 1-4 and Index. The Editor,
American Bookseller XX, 5. The Editor.
The American Chemist, VII, 10. The Editor.
Cooper Union, 26th, 27th and 28th annual reports. The Trustees.
Forest and Stream, XX VII, 19-X XIX, 18. The Editor.
The Forum. III, 1. The Editor.
American Geographical Society. Bulletin, 1885, No. 3, 1887 No. 3.
The Society.
Library Journal, XI, 12-XII, 11. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Literary News, VII, 12—VIII, 11. ‘ The Editor.
Mercantile Library Association of the City of New York, 66th annual report.
Bulletin, No. 9. The Librarian.
New York Medical Journal, XLIV, 23-XLVI, 22. The Editor.
Am. Museum of Natural History. Bulletin II, 1. Annual Report, 1886-7.
The Society.
Pharmaceutical Association. Proceedings, 9th Meeting. The Society.
Popular Science Monthly, Jan.—Dec. 1887. . The Editor.
Science, No’s. 200-251. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Swiss Cross, I, 1. The Editor.
Torrey Botanical Club. Bulletin, XIII, 12—-XIV, 11. The Society.
Nijmegen. Nederlandsche Botanische Vereeniging. Nederlandsch Kruidkundig
Archief, 4e Serie V, 1. The Society.
Niirmberg. Naturhistorische Gesellschaft. Jahresbericht, Abhandlungen, VIII, 4,
5. The Society.
Odessa. Société des Naturalistes de la Nouvelle Russie. Memoirs, XI, 2.
The Society.
Omaha. Omaha Public Library, 10th Annual report, The Librarian.
Ottawa. Ottawa Field-Naturalists’ Club. Transactions, No. 7. Ottawa Natural-
ist, I, 1-8. The Society.
Oxford. Annals of Botany, I, 1. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Padova. Societa Veneto-Trentina di Scienze Naturale. Atti. X,1. Bollettino, IV,
i The Society.
Palermo. Reale Accademia di Scienze, Lettere e Belle Arti. Bullettino, III, 1-38.
The Society.
R. Istitute Technico superiore. Programma, 1866-67. The Society.
Il Naturalista Siciliano, VI, 3-VII, 2. The Editor.
Paris. Annales des Mines. 8me Ser. IX, 5, 6; XI, 1, 2, 3.
Minister of Public Works in France.
Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Zoologie et Palzontologie, 7me, Ser. I,
1-6; II, 1-6; Botanique 7me, Ser. IV, 5,6; V, 1-6; VI, 1.
I. V. Williamson Fund.
Archives de Zoologie experimentale et générale, 2me Ser. IV, 4; V, 1. 2.
: I. V. Williamson Fund.
Ecole polytechnique. Journal, 56. The Society.
Institution Ethnographique. Bulletin de ]’Alliance Scient. Univ. 72, 73.
Journal de Conchyliologie, XX VI, 1. The Editor
1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 461
Journal de Micrographie, X, 11-1887, 14. The Editor.
Le Naturaliste, 1886, No. 47—2me, Ser. 17. The Editor.
Reyue d’Ethnographie, V, 4—-VI, 2. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Revue Geographique, No. 132-134, 136-139, 141. The Editor.
Revue Scientifique, XX XVIII, 22-25. The Editor.
Société d’Acclimatation. Bulletin, 4e, Ser. III, 8, 12-IV, 1, 2, 5-7, 9-12;
No. Supplem. The Society.
Société nationale @’Agriculture de France. Bulletin, 1886, No. 10,-1887,
No: 9: The Society.
Société de Biologie. Compte Rendu des Séances, 1886, No’s. 16, 27, 40,-1887,
No. 35. The Society.
Société Geologique de France. Bulletin, 3e. Ser. XIV, 6,-XV, 3.
The Society.
Société Malacologique de France. Bulletin, No. 2, Dec. 1886. Annales XX.
Proces-Verbaux, 1886, Jan. 9 July 4. Statuts. Revue Biographique, 1886.
The Society.
Société Francaise de Minéralogie. Bulletin, IX, 8—X, 6. The Society.
Société Philomathique. Bulletin, 7me, Ser. X, 3-XI. The Society.
Société Zoologique. Bulletin, 1886, No’s. 4-6; 1887, No’s. l, 2.
The Society.
Pawtucket. Free Public Library, Annual report, 1886. The Librarian.
Peoria. Scientific Association. Bulletin, 1887. The Society.
Perth. Scottish Naturalist. N.S. No. 14, 16-18. The Editor.
Philadelphia. Academy of Natural Sciences, Proceedings 1886, III-1887, II.
American Entomological Society, Transactions, XIII, 3,4; XIV, 1; Supple-
ment, 1887, I. The Society.
Am. Journal of the Medical Sciences, Jan.—Oct. 1887. The Editor.
American Journal of Pharmacy. XVI, 12, XVII, 11. The Editor.
American Naturalist, XX, 12,-XXI, 10. The Editor.
American Philosophical Society. Proceedings 124, 125. The Society.
College of Pharmacy. Alumni Association. Annual report, XXIII.
The Society.
~ The Conchololgists’ Exchange, I, 6, 8, 10,12; II, 1-4. The Editor.
The Dental Cosmos., XX VIII, 12-X XIX, 11. The Editor.
Engineers’ Club. Proceedings, VI, 1, 2. The Society.
Franklin Institute. Journal, No. 732-743. The Society.
Gardener’s Monthly. Dec. 1886—Nov. 1887. The Editor.
Historical Society of Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Magazine of History and
Biography. X, 4.-XI, 3. The Society.
Journal of Comparative Medicine and Surgery, VIII, 1-4.
I. V. Williamson Fund.
Library Co. of Philadelphia. Bulletin, Jan., July—Sept. 1887. The Librarian.
Medical and Surgical Reporter, LVI, 22-LVII, 22. The Editor.
Mercantile Libr. Co., Report, 1887. The Librarian.
Microscopical Bulletin, June,—Oct. 1887. The Editor.
Naturalists’ Leisure Hour., Dec. 1886.—Sept. 1887. The Editor.
Polyclinic. IV, 6—V, 5. The Editor.
Society for Organizing Charity. Annual report, 8th. The Society.
University of Pennsylvania. Department of Biology, Announcement for
session 1887-88.
Wagner Free Institute of Science. Transactions, I, 1887. The Trustees.
Zoological Society, 15th annual report. The Society.
Pisa. Societa Malacologica Italiana. Bulletino, XII, 5-15. Society.
Societa Tosc. di Scienze Naturali. Atti, Processi Verb. V, 119-263, VII, 2,
Memorie, VIII, 1. The Society.
Pittsburg. The Bookmart, IV, 42. The Publishers.
Poughkeepsie. Vassar Brothers Institute. Transactions, IV. The Director.
Prag. Deutscher Verein zur Verbreitung gemeinniitziger Kenntnisse. Sammlung
gemeinniitziger VGrtrage, No. 114. The Society.
Lotos. VII. The Editor.
462 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
Raleigh. Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society. Journal 1885-86. The Society.
Regensburg. K. B. botanische Gesellschaft. Flora, n. R. 44. The Society.
NaturwissenschaftlicherVerein. Correspondenz—Blatt, 40. The Society.
Reichenbach, IV. Verein fiir Naturkunde. Mittheilungen, 5es H. The Society.
Riga. Naturforscher—Verein. Correspondenzblatt, 29er, Jahrg. The Society.
Rio Janeiro. Museu Nacional. Archivos, III, 1, 2. The Director.
Observatoire. Revista, I, 11—II, 9. The Director.
Rochester. Warner Observatory. History and Work, 1883-1886, I.
The Director.
Rome. R. Accademia dei Lincei. Serie Quarta, Rendiconti, II, 8-III, 13, 2e,
Sem. ]-3. The Society.
Archives Italiennes de Biologie, VII, 8; VIII,1,2. Catalogue des Travaux,
1885. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale Vittorio Emanuell. Bollettino, I, 5—II, 3.
The Librarian.
Societa Geographica Italiana. Bollettino, Ser. II, An. XX, 11-XXI, 9.
The Society.
Societa degli Spettroscopisti Italiani. -Memorie, XV, 8-XVI, 8. The Society.
St. Gall. St Gallische naturwissenschaftliche Gesellschaft. Bericht, 1884-85.
The Society.
Saint John. Natural History Society of New Brunswick. Bulletin, No. 6.
St. Louis. Academy of Sciences. ‘Transactions, IV, 4. The Society.
St. Petersburg. K. Akademie der Wissenschaften. Bulletin, XXX, 4-XXXI,
2-4. Memoires XXXIV, 4-XXXV, 2. Repertorium fiir Meteorologie, ’
Supplementband, II-IV. ' The Society.
Hortus Universitatis Imperialis Petropolitanze. Scripta Botanica, I, II.
I. V. Williamson Fund.
Physikalische Central-Observatorium. Annalen, 1885, 1,2. The Director.
Imp. russkoye geografitcheskoye Obschichestvo. Izviestiya, XXII, 6-X XII,
3. Report, 1886.
Russian Physico—Chemical Society of the University, X VIII, 8, 9.
The Society.
Societas Entomologica Rossica. Horae, XX. The Society.
Salem, Essex Institute. Bulletin, X VIII, No’s 7-12. The Society.
Peabody Academy of Sciences, 19th annual report. The Society.
San Diego. West-American Scientist, II, 21-29. The Editor.
San Francisco. California Academy of Sciences. Bulletin, No’s 6, 7.
The Society.
Mercantile Library, 34th annual report. The Trus
Santa Barbara. Society of Natural History. Report of Proceedings. Bulletin,
No. 1. The Society.
Santiago. Wissenschaftlicher Verein. Verhandlungen, 5 H. The Society.
Semur. Société des Sciences historiques et naturelles, Bulletin. 2e S. No. 2.
The Society.
Siena. R. Accademia dei Fisiocritici. Sezione dei Cultori delle Scienze Medici.
Bolletino, V, 3-9. The Society.
Springfield, Illinois. Industrial University, 13th report. The Trustees.
Stettin. Entomologischer Verein. Entomologischer Zeitung, XLIV. The Society.
Verein fiir Erdkunde. Jahresbericht, 1886. The Society.’
Stockholm. Entomologiske Tidskrift, VII, 1-4. The Editor.
Geologiska Foreningens. Férhandlingar, VIII, 6-IX, 4. The Society.
Svenska Sillskabet fér Anthropologi och Geografi. Ymer. 1886, H. 1-4, 8.
The Society.
K. Vetenskaps Akademien. Ofversigt 1885, No. 10; 1886, No, 9; 1887,
No’s 1-6. Bihang, XI, 1—XII, 4. The Society.
Stuttgart. Humboldt, 1886, No. 12-1887, No. 11. I. V. Williamson Fund.
Kosmos. 1886, II, 4-6. I: V. Williamson Fund.
Verein fiir vaterlindische Naturkunde in Wiirttemberg. Jahreshefte. 438.
Switzerland. Société Helvetique des Sciences Naturelles, 69me Ses. The Society.
1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 463
Sydney. Linnean Society of New South Wales. Proceedings Ser. I, Vol. 2, No.
1; Ser. II, Vol. 1, No’s 2-4; Vol. 2, No. 2. Catalogue of the library,
1886. Tne Society.
Royal Society of New South Wales. Journal and Proceedings, XIX.
The Society.
Tasmania. Royal Society. Papers and Proceedings and Report, 1885.
The Society.
Tokio. Medicinische Facultat der kaiserlich-japanische Universitat. Mittheilungen,
Tels The Faculty.
Seii Kwai. Transactions, Supplement, V, 11—VI, 10. The Society.
University, Literature College. Memoirs, No. 1]. The Society.
Topeka. Kansas State Historical Society. Report, 5th biennial; 1887.
The Society.
Washburn Laboratory of Natural History. Bulletin, I, 7, 8. The Society.
Toronto. Canadian Institute. Proceedings, n. s. 1V, 2; V, 1. The Society.
Entomological Society. Annual Report, 1887. The Society.
Toulouse. Académie des Sciences, Inscriptions et Belles—Lettres. Memoires, 8me,
ser VILL : The Society.
Revue Mycologique, VII, 33-36. The Editor.
Société d’Histoire Naturelle. Compte rendu sommaire de la séances, 2 Juin,
20 Juil, 1886; Mars 2, 1887. Bulletin, XIX, XX. The Society.
Trenton, Natural History Society. Journal, I, 2. : The Society.
Trieste, Societa Adriatica di Scienze Naturali. Bollettino, X. The Society.
Tiibingen. Der Naturforscher, XIX, 27—-XX, 26. The Editor.
Turin, R. Accademia delle Scienze. Memorie, Ser. 2a XXXVII. Atti, XXI,
1-7. The Society.
Osservatorio della Regia Universita. Bollettino, XX. The Director.
Musei di Zoologia ed Anatomia comparata della R. Universita. Bollettino, I,
16; II, 19-26. i The Society.
United States. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Proceed-
ings, XXXV. The Society.
American Pharmaceutical Association. Proceedings, XXXIV. The Society.
Upsal. Observatoire de l’Université.- Bulletin meteorologique, X VIII.
The Society.
Utrecht. K. nederlandsch meteorologisch Instituut, Jaarboek, 1878, I1; 1886.
The Director.
Provinciaal Utrechtsch Genootschap van Kusten en Wetenschappen. Verslag,
1886. Aanteekeningen, 1886. The Society.
Valparaiso. Wissenschaftlicher Verein zu Santiago, 1886, 3 and 4 H.
The Society.
Venice. L’Ateneo Veneto. Ser. XI, Vol. I, No. 1—I], 6. The Editor.
R. Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti. Atti. Ser. VI, T. III, 10-V, 1.
The Society.
Notarisia, I, 5-7. The Editor.
Vienna. 1K. Akademie der Wissenschaften, Sitzungsberichte, math—naturw
Classe, XCII Bd. I Abth. 5-10, II Abth. 4-10, III Abth. 83-10; XCIII
Bd. I Abth. 1-5, II Abth. 1-5, III Abth. 1-5.; XCIV Bd. I Abth. 1-5,
II Abth. 1-5, III Abth. 1-5; XCV Bd. II Abth.1, 2. Denkschrift, L,
LT Lire The Society.
Anthropologische Gesellschaft. Mittheilungen, XVI, 1-X VII, 2.
The Society.
Congrés internationational d’hygiene et de démographie, 1887. Programme.
, The Council.
K. K. geologische Reichsanstalt. Verhandlungen, 1885, No. 13-1887, No.
14. Jahrbuch, XXXVI, 2-XXXVII, 1. Abhandlungen, XII, 1-4.
The Society.
464 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.
Mineralogische und petrographische Mittheilungen, (Tschermak), N. F. VIII,
1-IX, 3. I. V.- Williamson Fund.
Ornis IT, 2-IIT, 1. I. V. Williamson Fund.
K. k. zoologisch-botanische Gesellschaft. Verhandlungen, XXXVI, 3, 4;
XXXVIII, 1, 2. The Society.
Washington. The American Botanical Register, No. 1, 2 and 8.
Thomas Meehan.
American Monthly Microscopical Journal, VII, 12-VIII, 10. The Editor.
Chemical Society. Bulletin, No. ¥. The Society.
Philosophical Society. Bulletin, IX. The Society.
Smithsonian Institution. Annual Report for 1885, I. Miscellaneous Collections,
XXVITI-XXX. The Institution.
United States Fish Commission. Bulletin, VI, VII, 1-7. The Commission.
United States National Museum. Proceedings, VIII, pp. 289 et seq. 1887,
sheets 1-24. Annual Reports 1881, 1882 and 1883. The Director.
U. S. Publications. Monthly Catalogue, II, 7-III, 6.
I. V. Williamson Fund.
Wellington. New Zealand Institute. Transactions, XIX. :
Wiesbaden. WNassauischer Verein fiir Naturkunde. Jahrbucher, Jahrg. 40.
The Society.
Wilkes barre. Wyoming Historical and Geological Society. Proceedings III.
Angelo Heilprin.
Worcester. American Antiquarian Society. Proceedings, IV, 3, 4. The Society.
Wurzburg. Botanisches Institut. Arbeiten, III, 3. I. V. Williamson Fund,
Physik.-medicin. Gesellsch. WVerhandlungen, XX. Sitzungsberichte, 1886.
The Society.
Zoologisch—zootomisches Institut. Arbeiten, VIII, 2.
I. V. Williamson Fund.
Yokohama. Asiatic Society of Japan. Transactions, XIV, 2-XV, 2.
_ The Society.
Seismological Society of Japan. Transactions, X. The Society.
Zurich. Naturforschende Gesellschaft. Viertel-Jahrsschrift, XXX, XXXI, 1, 2.
: The Society.
Zwickau. . Verein fiir Naturkunde. Jahresbericht. 1886. The Society.
INDEX TO GENERA, ETC.
1887.
PMG ASHsT cast aclsnasasiseece se cs /satine 361 | Astarte...... 33, 340, 397, 398, 400, 402
A GanthOCystis....02.s0. -2.c.000.5 Reset eel So MeNt TOM ODEs rdesrnctassenessensesdaces 284, 290
PPAMNOLYCHUS: <..2.cs0csssessseses SOA) PAthmodontidee.ct xc. sacnecesxee seems 290
PERUDELISCHiecreracies seco seesllesstenas 309
PNCLOSOWMAsciee mene sccecidedses|sseeese oe 34 Sil WAU CHENODLCHUS ts 9---cleccseaeestertes 387
INGIAEONIG GAiet cesses seecee ce sess sess 53 | Auricula......... 138, 1389, 141, 142, 144
RUC HIM OPLEVS).cc.csosisscssioc'sn «vescccis 122 | Auriculus.........cessesseeseeeeees 144, 145
ALCHMOSDHTACTIUIM....c2-<6--ae0sesese 122)| Bakevellia..\...c<. L107
WTR OUS! cases-cns ere pogo dagabocunooc 68
PBUILOTAIN Ay. ctecrosicescssescerassivessis 19
IPADLOSOMMS tercrsss\scsecsesececeseses 387
NBAGETIA Vie oze.oeaisevcss'esie ‘Sétobcdboseuc 50)
MEAS COM Ascsarses/senievalcine cee sive's.e 142
PEAPCHOPSYCHE <22) oe ccyerassichesesese 294
WOAIMOGONTA .ccecsesccsccsrsesces cscs 142
WAI clitee cc coscsaavecrerssess see's 341, 401
AOD OD: , DOD
INIGGHOPreNUS ron ancts acces encanase nine 28
IM IMT OE waeaetamecscneccscsoce Cae EOoce 538
MUNMIV OMIT elesete eine ncoamies s's- sveseeutears 841, 401
Od@stoniia) Hasvesevecoccdeswececstences 51
Opy O18. .scnaccssesesecccsossnweles 12,13, 14
@maailomiyxets -scnsceocerscsseets SHOROO 136
Ommastrephes) <1... cccsecesecnoesae 23
Omphalotropis..........+++ 149, 150, 152
Opeasrecs-t)cosscesccmsecnenseates 131. 132
Ophiognathus ...........++ 851, 352; doo
Ophicard Glusty.sesecc-caessseehers 142, 143
Oxnithorhynichustess.sssseescsers 334, 335
Orophocrinus 83, 84, 86, 91,92,93, 95
TENTS ioe exseta se cotcessossecooneserecs 19
@Sfodes, S.ncecenee Steccsees 146, 147, 148
Ostreds ccisestesceceesst 841, 897-400, 402
Oxybaphus ..... TOGO RCO DRUG IONOEAORLIOC 330
Parmula...180, 181, 227, 236, 254-260
PAT PM atte sae seee cidetaae slatetsees 138, 184, 185
Parttilis;jeosesssusessanteneneoeyneese 133
IPASITHE ALL usecase cece coeae aac neeaeeenee 54
Batelllpoidrressscesacseseoseeceheeenes 11
IPAUTOC Oils seacdaccioccrecuetescssseet one 289
Patiwla-\ cies. sesccoceceasiowscectecees 129, 130
PAULrOdoOntide scree casccccaccaccssescee 289
IPAxllMGhesssecepcsitoscakedsccecsscoens 146
Re ctenvacses seseesen cs 841, 397-402, 405
Pectuneullusssceccescencctccseecss 898, 402
Pelargonium. ...<-cc.sceasesceseseeres 154
Rentrenitesicys.cccccceecosccemenecencte 83-92
468
Peralestes:ctsscccese sesso cece 284, 289 290
STAlEStLCAle te sessciscceoteceeceener 288, 289
PETALS eset eteedeeseescee ek eec tes 284, 289
Peraspalaxtscssacseiesessecntecees 284, 289
PELGA Se sessucisswasconeesereaien poeece 22, 295
(Reni pattsyetsssquedece apes: ssc sceases dll,
IPErnaieesecssecescees 34-36, 341, 398-402
PEEOPMOLAsscesccsesdeasconces scrote: 805
Phas colestesitscsesdasscececsesecccess 284
1 2otisee) KormeyS oscciceocenmeosaonasaconsc 290
PhascolotherntGacse.sacncscecscsevesee 288
Phascolothertumicsrs+..cesssceen 283, 288
PEDO esses suicecnssoeessceeelrvccee 154
Phocsenatesssssssnseace 858, 854, 358, 359
Physoclistivess rar sssscetinaccsaesenseess 353
BLty Stemieette cance culeeesaremas sec ac: 129, 130
Pilapiaulacideer.c.esee:eedrecsesteaas >= 285
Plapianlax’... rot tveves ses 2O2y Lon 250
PlASUISIatcesdceaesenepee sna cess ss eaee 391
Plat PMR Se-nsnssntescesenccsceeserens 391
Platycrinus........ 98, 95, 104, 106, 108,
110.
laty ac ilu stseaceec sceceecabe renee ce 359
PIECOtremalie.sscsceesccesoseeeeeen: 142, 143
PIGIOMIEY, CNAs cen wciencucdsee ceceress- 181
iPlenranectidae-cn.scceesse-aeseosese 391
PIEUKGLOMAeocsessseeccs secre 52, 399, 404
Piveatulars akessccsseeeueeees 397, 398, 402
IPIOTISE Maa neche sah cece wetareaticeieete 22
POly ClEMES 7 Jacceasetasessensceeecsas ste 38
AON ENG Sitascsadag se ce saddaaarctectes 27
POI GONGUUSS.ccrscscosscenesetssessce 50
Polymastodontidz c2.s+6...ccsse< == 286
Bria CodOnars.sevcisessoereesssessses se 287
Hol ynaGEPHiNasssesecean-sceseee=0 82 59
oly ptenisits-cocscsacva does sciceses 365, 367
Poly ZOall Jess veces ccvesseeceer senses 341 |
Potamolepsis.......... 180, 182, 269, 270 |
Potamospongida ........sssssesseeee 180
SGU ODUSies-cssneeesssoceneon cesses 359
PHHNLOMUS HE svencecoceveoaseccee sep iouste 285
Pealvanulintascars consseccasaversceees 590
Pupalsccceacircasaisdsaecscssae: 1387, 138, 146
Ay Gillalarentorsctesietesser antec: cen 80
PAVEUIOl aacte ces senegesernsscuereser 148, 144
Raia .......357) 808, 399, 862, 865, 366
Rania eececcseseceeenccuedentus 50, 357, 359
Real a acsecswaseesteeee 149, 150, 152, 158
ECA ec a osecaetesececcneoreneses 115
JNELGOCKINUS conc seus vas seametreccses 105
IRIMUNOCELOS: sesecdevdcscecaesetentecees 309
WVDIZOCTINUS: ceasaceaconcessaeteseces i111
Rumor cuillay s.ewstessinesscecesecec-sscer 54
ROBUN MAN sess cae cecidoboesienaseccsces: 405
WROSAlsiceawsctclosewedocvectsessse recess 155
Saccharum sscsccsecsseocsaeue sseeesees 118
SAlPAaenecsesevaccchenscrsces sieaescees 298-308
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF
[1887.
SAaXiCaVAa vccacciecsece irecieoeane 397, 398, 403
Schizoblastus 84, 85, 89, 98, 95
Sol€a...i:.cescnsceccaseensels eeteeseenee 391
Spalacotheridze.....+cs+sssvconsecous 288
Spalacotherium.,...ss.sssssesieene 284
Sphaeronistes:..iccns.sncaseeseeeeeeee 107
SPHENlOpsisi:.s.c-esseseheceeseeeneetae 53
Spongida: .....c0e.cnsses eset eeee 180
Spongilla......... 162, 165 167, 171 172
209, 222, 227
Sponpillidae’ ....c.-ocscsesenmeumeeeae 172
Sponpillinae--.a.csseceseeeemn ener 172, 180
Stearnsia: \y2c.cscesdenres eee 82. enoS
Stenogyidesnesseeeecee eee 1317 1323; ea
.91, 92, 93, 97-102,
107; 109, 110
Stephanocrinus......
Stereoonathus'...5.ccecsscesneeseee 282, 286
SUE XK etcantseensctaeaa BIDEBOD IC Scc Lo. 20, 22
Strombocarpus) 2. .scseeesseneneemaeas 235
Stylacodon\.....20cv-sccessseitsceaneee 290
Stylodon’ ...¢caJcccotsesadesseceree 284, 290
Stylodontidae............... 286, 289, 290
Subulina ...scsts«sviese cageeoetaemeneaee 131
Succinea ..).-.cnscstosectaseeeeeeee 136, 137
Symbathocrinus:...s-cswaseeceseeaee 6
TANIA c..ssmencosset ere cease 20.28. 24
"Taheita..c.ciccseveccsuestoseemeneerme 146
Talarocrinus,...csseseseneleesteomeetene 110
Walpavn.ec