aie ei SOO AA ey er Quek ey PU ere eee ie ' } prea ecM : 7 era wat $ gi eee! fa H : iyie Mees et PRT Pata ay Ee i poh 4 ; ate tek had £9 M 4 : Pampa zer ee reye 23 bok te te $ nt au efit shyh gape ; EGS Bed: a Fy ee nat fet sertete 2 eto sit ga yp hee naet ibaa PAS om *\, a! 4 variety eaate itd tebe ' rit re Clelulatael Piaee baat a) i “ bers vet hat 9) pares Ret'd td: Soimed Date Ret'd: foc 6 42. | a PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF NATURAL SCIENCES PHILADELPHIA. COMMITTEE OF PUBLICATION: JosEpH Lerpy, M. D., Gero. H. Horn, M. D., Epw. J. Nouan, M. D., THomAs MEEHAN, JOHN H. REDFIELD. EpiIToR: EDWARD J. NOLAN, M.D. PHILADELPHIA: ACADEMY OF NATURAL SCIENCES, LOGAN SQUARE, 1888. ACADEMY OF NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA February 14, 1888. I hereby certify that copies of the Proceedings for 1887 have been presented at the meetings of the Academy as follows :— Pages Q9ito 24 . : . February 22, 1887. 6 Dito) 40s . . . March 1, 1887. Oe AUN toy (Fa) . May 31, 1887. ss Oi LOW nen ee : : Sune 14, 1887. a fotoul 2 (ae ‘ : . July 5, 1887. PAL Tio) URI. ; : . August 2, 1887. be BSP tw) iets} : : . August 16, 1887. « 169 to 184 . sgt . August “sORISSie cP Santo 26 %17 to 248 249 to 264 265 to 296 297 to 312 813 to 328 329 to 360 361 to 376 September 6, 1887. October 4, 1887. October 18, 1887. November 1, 1887. December 13, 1887. December 20, 1887. January 17, 1888. January 24, 1888. Pe avi(ioas ese . January 381, 1888. «<) 393: to 424). : : . February 7, 1888. EDWARD J. NOLAN, Recording Secretary. PHILADELPHIA: HORACE BINDER, PRINTER. LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS. With reference to the several articles contributed by each. For Verbal Communications see General Index. PAGE Allen, Harrison, M. D. A prodrome of a Memoir on animal locomotion..... 60 Chapman, Henry C., M. D. Notes on the Anatomy of Salpa. Plates XIV, Ok Wegnbdioao aaah asbnadeeds ACRE CCC RD ROG UASANSOUD Bea HSoUAT ene DOLERCB-aEnUsema coocesocason 334 Dolley, Chas. S..M.D. On the histology of Salpa. Plate XIII............... 298 Eigenmann, Carl H. Notes on the specific names of certain North American ENGI SS Me Mee ae eco cere cceb si iascades poi eanincn sen Nous seiicslaceen dasmeoemsanteders 295 Fielde, Adele M. Notes on the fresh-water Rhizopods of Swatow, China.... 122 Garrett, Andrew. The terrestrial Mollusca inhabiting the Samoa or Navigator LISTEN Si sageequanadbinosde. coop bonane bbbdyesdbenduAdon Sannd 5 codoriagubsapocc cosanseresdonge 124 Heilprin, Angelo. The classification of Post-Cretaceous deposits......... .... 314 The Miocene Mollusca of the State of New Jersey...........sceeseeeersseveee 397 Jordan, David Starr. Description of two new species of Fishes from South PATEL CAME tere cct cet dan sdouas feispine eceiseies Holaticeaceaac ack eosiuactiecinn neeeennee’ 387 NoreroneAtcbinusmhoxentala.-qesnaacssisstescsssescemesscceaseesceew eae: eesbaieetnne ss 389 Koenig, George A., Ph. D. On Zinc-Mangenese Asbestos..............2:0000e0+ 47 Leidy, Jos. M. D. Notice of some parasitic WOrmMS............cee00 +0 os SEdcuon 20 McCook, Rev. Henry C. Prolonged life of invertebrates: Notes on the age anduhabitsottherAmerican arantWlarpesscssscrcesse<. serach one esschasence 369 Meehan, Thomas. Contributions to the Jife-histories of plants...........:.00000+ 323 Meyer, Otto. On invertebrates from the Eocene of Mississippi and Alabama. IPlefra) UU is ache sorgenancca.sodaooulsoos qacdicaaaadcanicoo subsoc 6 OCHS ocr ot apneanCaeande 51 Osborn, Dr. Henry F. On the structure and classification of the Mesozoic RViAMMNAl lata vess ve boar seteameeeeccedss Mec smadesenecedeeuesmads Kode acees cat cieese 282 Poxtenwuhos. ©. A list ofithe Camees of Pennsylvaniaaessec\ncccccacersovense vies 68 Potts, Edward. Contributions towards a synopsis of the American forms of fresh-water Sponges with descriptions of those named by other authors and from all parts of the world. Plates V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, XI, PXGI Pr omaneaa see tea ncsacssepwetoisupancen soeiteWeraecdondeecansancicl-lscisa(nsce send temas 158 Rominger, Dr. C. Description of a new form of Hydrozoa................+++ 11 Description of primordial fossils from Mount Stephens, N. W. Territory Pigeamna da late Medesacre asic seep sien cecessndecenactuece cnseronsecsedeccesper sos 12 Ryder, John A. On the homologies and early history of the limbs of verte- PALES dates eat Encse oes erage Aca punnes Lave ntaapcocisndeapene losscietends yas kokebabegex 344 Wachsmuth, Charles and Frank Springer. The summit plates of Blastoids, Crinoids and Cystids, and their morphological relations. Plate IV..... White, Dr. Charles A. On new generic forms of Cretaceous Mollusca and their relation to other forms. Plate TV. ... 20.02. 1. icseceenesecoamelcemeeeeaee On the Cretaceous Mollusca of Texas and their relation to those of other portions of North America........ .--sssssccseonssncessnsnscsesscanenss uspnsien 82 PROCHE DINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 1887, JANUARY 4, 1887. Mr. THomas MrxEuAn, Vice-President, in the chair. Fifteen persons present. A New Species of Catfish (Ictalurus)—Prof. ANGELO HEILPRIN described a species of catfish from Lake Okeechobee, Florida, which differed in several well-marked characters from the various other North American species that had hitherto been described. The species is most nearly related to IJctalwrus lacustris, the “catfish of the lakes,’ which it generally resembles. The color over the greater part of the body is blue-black, varying to black on the back, and white on the ventral surface; the barbels of one of the inferior pairs are white, and nearly so in the second pair, The dorsal fin is situated nearer to the adipose fin than to the snout; humeral process moderately long, about one-half the length of the pectoral spine; tail deeply forked, the upper lobe barely longer than the lower one. Length of largest specimen caught, about 20 inches. It was proposed to name this species Ictalurus Okeechobeensis. 2 10 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. JANUARY 11. The President, Dr. Jos. Lerpy, in the chair. Eighteen persons present. Papers under the following titles were presented for publication : “Description of a new form of Bryozoa,” by Dr. C. Rominger ; “ Notice of some Parasitic Worms,” by Jos. Leidy, M. D. JANUARY 18. Mr. Jonn H. ReEpFIexp, in the chair. Fourteen persons present. A paper entitled “On new Generic Forms of Cretaceous Mol- lusca and their relation to other forms,” by Dr. C. A. White, was presented for publication. The following were ordered to be printed :— 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 11 DESCRIPTION OF A NEW FORM OF BRYOZOA. BY DR. C. ROMINGER. Patellipora stellata. PI. I, fig. 10. Saucer-shaped colonies attached to foreign bodies by a short, stout root-like stem. Under surface of colony covered by a dense, smooth epithecal crust. From the centre of the concave, terminal, discoid expansion diverge from 8 to 10 rounded, stout radial crests or bars, which, towards the margin of the disk, dilate wedge-like. Intervening between these radii are deep furrows, likewise dilating toward the margin. The outer half of each of these wedge-like bars is again divided into two branches by a furrow entering them from the margin and running into a point about half way from the centre. The surface of these forked radial bars is covered with from 3 to 4 longitudinal rows of small, round orifices, which make them resemble the poriferous side of a fenestelloid stem. These orifices dilate in the interior into flask-like cell-bags, which can be observed closely packed together, on the underside of the bars, if by accidental wearing the epithecal coating of the underside has been removed. This peculiar Bryozoa was discovered by me in some drift- boulders at Ann Arbor, associated with characteristic corniferous limestone fossils, in silicified condition. Only three of them were found by me; the most perfect and largest one of them is represented in the figure. 12 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. DESCRIPTION OF PRIMORDIAL FOSSILS FROM MOUNT STEPHENS, N. W. TERRITORY OF CANADA. BY DR. C. ROMINGER. My friend, Mr. Otto Klotz, in charge of the Astronomical work of the Canada Dominion, while engaged with geodetic measurements accidentally discovered this very interesting locality, which furnishes an abundance of well-preserved primor- dial fossils, particularly Trilobites, imbedded within a dark gray slate rock, of about 300 or 400 feet in thickness. Above the slate succeeds a large series of dolomitic rock beds, and below a very large belt of quartzites crops out; although the immediate contact of the quartzite with the slate is not seen in the locality. The specimens collected on this spot Mr. Klotz had the kindness to send to me. He gave others to the University of Michigan, his Alma Mater. Many of these fossils are remarkably well pre- served, and nearly all of them are believed to be undescribed forms. I have also to acknowledge here the liberality of Prof. A. Winchell, who allowed me the use of the specimens sent to the University. Among the collected fossils the most frequent form is an Ogygia, which, in honor of its discoverer, I propose to name Ogygia Klotzi. Pl. I, fig. 1. More than a dozen perfect specimens of it are on hand, the largest one of which measures 11 centimetres in length, by a width of 6 centimetres; others are smaller in all gradations down to a length of only 16 millimetres. One specimen, which is other- wise not perfect, has the head complete, with attached movable cheeks; in all the others the movable cheeks are missing. The lat expanded specimens have suffered a degree of com- pression, as usually occurs with fossils preserved in a slate rock. In a general way the longitudinal diameters of the head, the thorax, and the pygidium are equal, but the latter is usually somewhat longer than either of the other body-divisions. The glabella is large, reaching almost the front margin, which projects as an elevated narrow rim. The convexity of the glabella is only moderate, and the lateral furrows on it, three in number, are very shallow, often scarcely perceptible. Its sides are almost parallel, only slightly bulging Proc Acad. Nat. Sci. Philada. 1887 Pavesi C.Rominger, del. Rominger, fossils from Mt. Stephens. & c. £66 US) » i pate sis ath | duh = vt 1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 13 out near the centre; width of the glabella measured across the upper edge of the palpebral rim is 4 of the entire diameter of the head at this place. Fixed cheeks are rather broad, the reniform palpebral lobe is margined by a projecting rim, which rim is seen continued under the form of a low rounded ruga extending from the upper angle of the eyes obliquely inward and upward, so as to meet the glabella at the third anterior lateral furrow of it. The occipital furrow and its lateral continuation across the cheeks is well marked. The movable cheeks terminate backward in a long spine reaching down to the third thoracic segment. The facial suture line terminates posteriorly near the genal angles, anteriorly it intersects the margin on both sides of the glabella, quite a distance off from it, about perpendicular above the eye rim. Thoracic segments in all the specimens, small or large, eight. The gently curved scabre-like ribs abruptly taper backward into a short spinose apex. Their centre bears a rounded broad depres- sion, somewhat diagonal to the axis of the rib, and bordered on both sides by a projecting rounded ruga of which the anterior is more conspicuous than the posterior. The rachis is moderately convex, gently tapering backward; its width, compared with the length of the ribs, is as one and one-half to two in proportion- The pygidium, as above stated, exceeds the head or thorax slightly in length; it bears in the larger specimens eleven well- marked annulations, flanked by as many costal expansions which dilate considerably toward the margin, and bear in place of the central depression of the free ribs a rounded central ruga bordered on each side by a furrow; the edges of the anchylosed ribs are likewise indicated by an elevated rim. The curvature of the pygidial ribs is much stronger than on the thorax, and their position to the rachis is more oblique, grad- ually increasing backwards, so that the hinder ribs of the pygidium meet the rachis under an acute angle. The edge of the pygidium is formed by a smooth convex rim, against which the costal rugze abut. ; In the figured specimen the movable cheeks were missing, and have been restored from another specimen with the head perfect. Ogygia serrata. nov.sp PI. I, figs. 2, 2a. There are four complete specimens in the collection, besides numerous fragmental ones; nearly all are about equal in size; the 14 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. figured specimen is seven centimetres long, and five centimetres wide, measuring from one genal spine to the other. Head, thorax, and pygidium of equal length. General form of the head and course of the facial sutures cor- respond almost completely with the previously described species. The glabella of this form is somewhat broader and more promi- nent than in the former; also the glabellar furrows are more distinctly marked; they are three in number, the hinder one is the largest, directed obliquely inward and backward, but not reaching to the centre of the glabella. The palpebral rim and the rugosity continued from it upward across the fixed cheeks are the same as in the former species. The movable cheeks are protracted into long slender spines, which reach as far down as the fifth thoracic rib. Rachis broad, almost equal in diameter with the length of the corresponding ribs, deducting their spiniform prolongations. The occipital ring terminates with a triangular monticulose prom- inence, overlapping the first thoracic ring, and likewise each one of all these annuli of the thorax, and the pygidium bears a strong spine on the median line. The thorax of this species is, in all the specimens examined, composed of only seven segments. The pygidium has five annulations with as many ribs corre- sponding to them. These ribs dilate considerably toward the margin, as in the former; but while in that, a smooth ronnded rim edges the pygidium, in this form the principal ruga of each rib extends beyond the margin of the pygidium under the form of a strong acute spine, directed backward, so as to be almost parallel with the axis of the body. Five of such spines fringe each side of the pygidium; their size is gradually diminished toward the posterior end, The hypostoma is in most of the specimens preserved, occupy- ing its natural position. The shape is represented by one of the annexed figures and needs therefore no further verbal description. Many loose, but much smaller hypostomas, of which I likewise figure a few (PI. I, figs. 2b and 2c), were found scattered through the slate rock; to which of the associated trilobitic forms they belong, I was unable to ascertain. Two other forms of Trilobites occur with the just described Ogygias, which in the configuration of their heads and in the 1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 15 course of the facial suture lines fully correspond with them, but they differ by the much smaller size of their pygidia in compari- son with the size of the concerned thoracic divisions and the heads. A further difference is in the number of thoracic segments, which in them is nine instead of eight, and seven, as in the two first described typical forms of Ogygia. The glabella of the latter also shows three lateral furrows, while in the two forms to be described, four very well marked glabellar furrows are observable. These differences and principally the difference in the proportion of the size of head, thorax and pygidium, appear to me sufficient to distinguish these forms from the genus Ogygia, and I propose to apply to them the generic name Embolimus. Embolimus spinosa, nov.sp. PI. I, fig. 3. Only one, almost perfect specimen of this form is in the collec- tion, but the number of fragmental specimens observable in the slabs prove that this is not a rare species. The specimen figured is 34 millimetres long; length of head 14 millimetres; length of thorax 15 millimetres; length of pygidium 5 millimetres, without counting the length of spinous processes. The glabella is large, moderately convex, of equal width in all its length, reaching close to the front margin, which is formed by a narrow upturned rim. The four glabellar furrows are well developed, none reaches the centre of the glabella, the hinder ones are the largest, running obliquely backward, the second and third furrows extend almost at right angles from the margin of the glabella, but the apex of the second is turned backward while the apex of the third furrow is curved forward. The fourth and smallest furrow is directed obliquely forward. The occipital ring forms a triangular projection of the posterior margin, which is crowned with a stout short spine, also each of the thoracic annuli exhibits a faint indication of former orna- mentation by a spine which is broken off in the specimen. The pygidium has four sharp annulations with as many costal appendages, which, a short distance off from the rachis, are ab- ruptly bent backward, tapering into long spines projecting over the pygidial margin in a direction parallel with the longitudinal axis of the body. 16 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. Also the thoracic ribs terminate with long spines directed obliquely backward. Each rib bears a deep depression in the central part, which, commencing near the spinose peripheral end, runs diagonally across the broader part of the ribs meeting the rachis near the upper end of each annulation; but previous to that, this depression sends off a side branch backward, which meets the posterior part of the same annulus, leaving between the two depressions a pointed triangular elevation in continuity with the convex portion of the annuli; the edges of the ribs project as elevated rounded rims, broadest in the middle, and tapering toward the rachis and toward the periphery, where the anterior rim is seen to constitute the body of the projecting spines. Embolimus rotundata,nov.sp. Pl. I, figs. 4 and 5. There is only one specimen in the collection which shows head, thorax and pygidium in connection, but the movable cheeks are missing. Other fragmentary specimens, however, exhibit the head complete. The proportions in the size of the three partitions of the body are: Head, 13 millimetres; thorax, 14 millimetres; pygidium, 9 millimetres. Nine thoracic ribs, as in the former species; the pygidium has six well-marked annulations and corresponding pleural expansions, margin rounded, no spinose projections. The thoracic ribs are similar in configuration with those of the pre- ceding species, but they terminate rather abruptly with short pointed ends. The head likewise closely resembles the former species, with the difference that the glabella expands considerably toward the front end, while the glabella of the former is all its length of equal width. The movable cheeks, observable in one of the specimens, terminate backward in a long spine, reaching as far as the fourth thoracic articulation. The two figures represent a fragment with complete head and another incomplete specimen with the movable cheeks missing. Monocephalus Salteri? Billings. Pl. I, fig. 6. I have, with some doubt, identified a small specimen found in association with the others with the form described by Billings under this name. The minuteness of the fossil, and its being merely a cast without shell, prevents the observation of the more delicate structural details, but the general appearance of Billings’ figure, as well as his description, are satisfactory proof to me that 1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. ty both fossils under consideration must be closely related, if not identical. The specimen, of which a figure is subjoined, has a total length of 16 millimetres; length of head, 6 millimetres; length of thorax with seven segments, also 6 millimetres; length of pygidium, 4 millimetres. The head of the specimen, deprived of the movable cheeks, bears a large glabella considerably dilating in front, with three distinct lateral furrows. The thoracic ribs are deeply excavated in the centre, and the adjoining margins of every rib project as high ridges with a dividing line along the crest. The annuli composing the pygidium are rather obsolete, but four sharp fur- rows, spreading from each side of the rachis, indicate its compo- sition of at least four anchylosed segments. Conocephalites cordillere, nov. sp. PI. I, fig. 7. Numerous specimens of this little trilobite occur in the collec- tion; their average size in length is about 25 millimetres; the movable cheeks of the specimens are generally missing, other- wise the bodies are usually perfect. Glabella conical, convex, provided with three lateral furrows, of which the posterior is the largest, quite oblique; occipital furrow deep. The glabella in its extension towards the front varieS’ some, as between it and the upturned projecting rim of the front a broader or narrower strip of the fixed cheeks intervenes. The fixed cheeks are broad, margined with a small reniform burrelet at the palpebral angle of the facial line, and fromthe anterior end of this eye-rim a faint rugosity is seen to run across the fixed cheeks, toward the front part of the glabella, near its anterior suleus. Rachis uniformly tapering toward the tail-end, consisting in the thoracic part of seventeen segments, in the majority of speci- mens examined; but in one, evidently belonging to the same species, I counted only fourteen, and in another fifteen. The ribs are pretty straight, with a deep central depression and high projecting marginal rims, which are joining the rims of the neighboring ribs in a sharp linear groove. Each annulus of the rachis at its juncture with the ribs is decorated with a rounded node. The entire surface of the body appears, in well-preserved » specimens, covered with delicate papilli and granules. 18 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. The pygidium is very small, but clearly composed of at least three anchylosed segments. Bathyurus? PI. I, fig. 8. A single specimen in the collection, or rather an impression of one, from which I prepared a gutta-percha cast, leaves me in doubt in regard to its generic affinities. The smooth, rather convex glabella, without indentation by lateral furrows and the shape of the facial suture lines, resemble some forms described by Billings under the name Bathyurus ; also the configuration of the other parts of the body would agree with these, but the number of thoracic segments in the specimen under observation is only six, while nine are claimed for Bathyurus. Not considering the material on hand as suffi- cient to decide whether this is a new generic type, or might be a form of Bathyurus with a normal number of thoracic segments, of which some became hidden by being shoved under the head, I content myself for the present by giving an exact copy of the gutta-percha cast formed in the impression of the slate-rock. Agnostus. Pl. I, fig.9. Compare A. zzteger Barr. Many of these minute crustaceans are found scattered on the slabs of slate. They all apparently belong to one species. The anterior valve differs from the posterior by the conical shape of its glabella terminating near the front margin in a bluntly pointed end; the median line of this glabella rises near the posterior end into a root-like crest, terminating in a back- ward projecting spinose protuberance; the posterior part of the glabella exhibits also an indentation by lateral furrows. The rachis or central convex protuberance of the posterior valves is equilateral and not conical; the posterior end of it it abruptly rounded off; a deep furrow runs across this central protuberance on the posterior third of it; its larger anterior portion bears a short spinose projection. The two thoracic annuli are divided by furrows and constric- tions into nodular partitions representing rachis and ribs, but of too small a size to be accurately represented by a description, or by figures. The subjoined figure of one of the specimens is enlarged three diameters. Besides the described crustaceans, the slates inclose also num- erous minute Brachiopods, several of which belong to the genus Obolella. One of these Obolellas, almost circular in outline, with 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 19 marginal umbo, exhibits most delicate concentric lines of growth with ruffled edges, in addition to which also faint radial striz emanating from the umbo are observable. Other similarly rounded specimens of Obolella show fine con- centric striation, but in comparison with the former may be considered smooth. Also more oval-shaped specimens of Obolella occur. The genns Orthis, in a form similar to Orthis pepinensis is likewise represented; another form resembles Kutorgina sculptilis Meek. Smail shells of the shape of Leptena are also found, and one specimen similar to Metoptoma. Some slender stems, consisting of shining carbonaceous matter, seem to belong to Grapholites. Finally I have to mention yet the occurrence of a form of JVheca or Hyolites, of the same appearance as Theca primordialis figured by Hall. As I intend to examine this locality myself, as soon as the season allows, I expect to be able to give before long a more complete exhibition of the fauna inclosed within these slate-rocks. 20 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. NOTICE OF SOME PARASITIC WORMS. BY JOSEPH LEIDY, M. D. Filaria megacantha. Body straight, nearly uniform cylindrical, slightly narrowed pos- teriorly, obtuse at the ends, milk-white in color; head rounded; mouth bounded by a pair of prominent papillate lips. Female: caudal extremity straight, obtusely rounded, smooth, without anal aperture. Male: caudal extremity conical, obtuse, = bialate; ale narrow, united around the end of the tail, together forming a shallow pouch, with a row on each side of six rib-like papille, of which four are in advance and two behind the genital aperture. A long, curved and Fic. 1.—Side view of caudal ex- : : tremity of the male, highly Partially exserted penal spiculum and magnified. a nearly straight short one. Eight females, 35 to 60 mm. long; cephalic extremity a short distance back, 0°75 wide; body at middle, 0°625; near the tail end the same width. Seven males, 20 to 25 mm. long; cephalic extremity, 0°375 wide; body at middle, 0°5; near tail end, 0°25 wide. Large penal spiculum, 2°5 to 3 mm. long; shorter one, 0°18 to 0°22 mm.; caudal bursa, 0°28 long; width of ale, 0°036 mm. From the subcutaneous connective tissue of the neck and mandible of the Short-eared Owl, Asio occipitrinus (Strix brachyotus). This appears to be a much smaller and different species from the Filaria attenuata Rud., found in the same bird and others of the order in Europe. Dujardin ' gives as the size of the latter 250 to 308 mm. for the female, and 136 to 148 mm. for the male, with 1 mm. for the longer penal spiculum. Schneider ? gives for fF, attenuata, from Falco peregrinus, 330 mm. for the female, and 115 mm. for the male, the caudal bursa of which he represents as circular. He remarks that the Filaria of Strix and of Cecus glandarius, referred by Rudolphi to F. attenuata, is a different — species, but does not describe it, for want of perfect specimens. 1 Helminthes, 51. 2 Monog. Nemat., 89. 1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 21 Obtained in Chester Co., Pa., December, 1886, by Dr. B. H. Warren. Three specimens, females, two inches in length, from the orbit of the Hen-hawk, Buteo borealis, in the collection of the Army Medical Museum, appear to belong to this species. Ascaris tulura. Body cylindrical, most narrowed and tapering anteriorly, of a pinkish color; mouth trilobed, the lobes together nearly as wide as the head. Female: caudal extremity nearly as thick as the middle of the body, straight; tail short, obtusely conical, as broad at base as the length. Male: caudal extremity tapering, slightly incurved, with a row on each side of minute papille (20 or more?); tail short, conical, ending in a spheroidal knob. 3 2 One female; length 125 mm.; width of Fre. 2—Caudal extremity cephalic extremity a short distance from Gi eI eae gee arate = o Highly magnified. the end, 0375; at middle of body, 1°25; near the tail, 1 mm. wide; tail, 0°25 long. One male; length 90 mm.; width at middle, 0°75; tail, 0°25 long; rounded end, 0°125 thick. From the ventriculus of the Red-shouldered Hawk, Buteo lineatus. This worm approximates the Ascaris depressa Rud., observed in many rapacious birds, but appears to be a different species. Diesing! describes the tail of the male of the former as shortly mucronate and papillose beneath, and Schneider’ figures it according to that description. Specimens obtained in Chester Co., Pa., December, 1886, by De: Be Et Warren. Ascaris sulcata Rudolphi. Body anteriorly attenuated; posteriorly more or less closely spiral; head with prominent lips. Female: tail conical, recurved from the anus, ending in a minute mucro. Male: tail conical, shortly mucronate, bialate, with a row on each side of four or five nipple-like papille. Female, up to 25 mm. long by 0°5 wide at middle; tail, 0°25 long. Male, 15 mm. long by 0°3 wide at middle, 1 Syst. Helm., 156. 2 Monog. Nemat., 41. 22 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. Numerous specimens were found tightly clinging by the mouth to the lining membrane of the stomach of T'rachemys scabra. Echinorhynchus caudatus Zeder. Body narrow, cylindrical, nearly equal throughout, strongly corrugated so as to appear annulated, posterior extremity conical. Proboscis cylindrical, expanded at base, with 9 to 11 rows of strong hooks, succeeded with about 15 rows of smaller hooks. Length, from 5 lines to an inch; breadth, 0°5 to 155 mm. From two individuals of the Swallow-tailed Kite, Elanoides furcatus, in one of which they were associated with Tenia viator. Two specimens from Strix nebulosa. Florida. Dr. B. H. Warren. Echinorhynchus hystrix Bremser. Body cylindrical, much corrugated, widest anteriorly and minutely echinate. Proboscis clavate, with about a dozen rows of hooks. One-fourth to three-fourths of an inch long and one line wide at the fore part. Numerous specimens from the intes- tine of the Darter, Plotus anhinga. Florida. Dr. B. H. Warren. Tenia simplicissima. Head small, unarmed, truncate; bothria spherical, terminal, occupying the four angles; neck very long, ©} nearly or as wide as the head, body grad- ually widening to the posterior third and versely linear, subsequently reversed dish- like, gradually longer and wider, then cam- ae + panulate and gradually becoming longer and Fic. 4. Cephalic extrem- P ity: s. Segments about Darrower. Generative apertures and ova middle; 6. Posterior ynobserved. A number of specimens from segments. Magnified 5 ° See jee the Cod, Gadus callarias, up to 20 lines by 1 mm. where widest. Two only of the specimens retained the head. FA then tapering; anterior segments trans- Tenia Ambloplitis. Head quadrate, spheroidal, consisting almost entirely of the four large spherical bothria, with the summit slightly prominent and conical or depressed and unarmed; neck very short or none; body compressed cylindrical, gradually widening from the head to near the posterior part where it slightly narrows to the end; segments linear, becoming gradually longer and wider, and then more quadrate; all deeply and pretty regularly wrinkled into 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 23 two or three annuli. Genital apertures obscure. Length 8 to 12 inches; in alcohol contracted to 3% to 5 inches; greatest width 2 mm. Head 0°5 to 0°625 mm. long, and 0°75 to 0°875 broad. Bothria 0375 mm. diameter. Commencement of body 0625 wide. Anterior segments 0°125 long, 0°625 wide; subsequently 0°375 long and 1°5 to 1°875 wide; posterior - 8. seoments 0°75 long by 1 mm. wide. Fic. 7. Cephalic extremity ; 8. Seg- Weenumber of specimens from the ™™% "= middle 20 dametos. stomach of the Rock Bass, Ambloplites rupestris. Lake George, New York. This species resembles the Tenia ocellata Rudolphi of the European Perch, Perca fluviatilis, and perhaps is the same. Tenia Micropteri. Head large, compressed spheroidal, with four subterminal spherical bothria and a papilliform unarmed summit; neck none; body obscurely segmented, and with no obvious internal organs, posteriorly variably narrowed and obtusely rounded at the end. Length from half an inch to an inch, and about 1 mm. wide. Apparently a larval form; found in the body cavity of the Black Bass, Micropterus nigricans. Six worms, soft, white, and active. The longer ones of an inch would elongate to double the length, becoming proportionately narrower. The head, about 1 mm. or more in diameter, varied in length and breadth, according to contraction, sometimes one and sometimes the other being the larger. Lake George, N. Y. Last summer, while at Mt. Desert, Me., I examined a squid, Ommastrephes illecebrosa, with the hope of finding the singular parasite Dicyema. The specimen was in bad condition, and while I found none of the latter, I obtained from it several small worms, which I suppose to be the larval form of a cestode. They were yet quite active, though the host was already putrescent. I suspected them to belong to Tetrabothriorhynchus migratorius, observed in European cephalopods, but examination showed them to be different. They moved so actively and incessantly, con- tracting, expanding and writhing, that it was difficult to obtain a clear idea of the shape of the worm. It appears most nearly related with Tenia, and provisionally may be regarded as a 24 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. larval form of this genus. Its more evident characters may be summed up as follows: Tenia loliginis. Head unarmed, without rostellum, quadrilobate, continuous with the neck, which is variably long and narrow or short and irregularly contracted and expanded, and is constricted from the body. Lobes of the head elliptical, contractile and expansile and becoming variably folded or corrugated, furnished each at the upper pole with a hemispherical bothria. Body about as long as the head and neck, extensile and contractile, obconic or obovate, compressed, acute posteriorly, unsegmented. No inte- rior organs visible except a vessel along the sides of the neck and encircling the lobes of the head. Color white. Length to about half an inch; width about 1 mm. Dr. H. C. Chapman informed me that he had previously observed this parasite in the squid. Monostomum obscurum. Elongated elliptical, flattened, obtusely angular in front, obtusely rounded behind. Oral and genital or other apertures scarcely distinguishable. Length, 4 to 8 lines; width 1 line. Numerous specimens in the stomach of a Jew-fish, Megalops — thrissoides. Collection of the Army Medical Museum, Washington. Distomum Aquile. Spatulate, cochleariform, widest behind, obtuse at both ends; mouth circular unarmed; acetabulum sessile, about as large as the mouth. Length, 3 lines; width in front, 4 a line; behind, # of a line. Two specimens from the trachea of the Bald Eagle, Halietus leucocephalus. Collection of the Army Medical Meseum. Distomum hispidum Abildgaard. Body much attenuated in advance, covered with minute recurved spines, which become obsolete at the back part. Head with a pair of alate appendages covered with stronger recurved spines, and a small group in the intervals before and behind. Mass of eggs giving the axis of the body behind a red appear- ance, Ova oval, 00°4 mm. long, 00°24 mm. broad. Numerous specimens, about 4 lines long by 0°5 mm. where widest behind. From the intestine of the Sturgeon, Accipenser sturio, of the Delaware River, at Philadelphia. Nitzschia elegans Baer. Several specimens of this leech, four lines long, were taken from the gills of the same sturgeon. 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 25 JANUARY 25. Rey. Henry C. McCook, D. D., Vice-President, in the chair. Twenty-one persons present. The following were elected: members; Bernard Persh, Geo. B. Cresson, Joseph Whitehouse, William B. Marshall and William Osler, M. D. On a Tumor in the Oyster—Prof. Joun A. RypER remarked that a few days since Professor Leidy handed him the soft parts of an oyster, which he said he thought might be an interesting subject for investigation, inasmuch as a very large tumor had grown into the pericardiac cavity. The specimen is a very remarkable one, and seems to be the first of the kind which has fallen under the observation of naturalists; neither Professor Leidy nor the speaker, in the course of large opportunities for observation, having previously encountered anything of the sort. It is also of great interest as proving that such pathological growths may be developed in the mollusca, thus showing that even in the invertebrata there may be morbid proliferations of certain tissues which simulate in certain respects those observed to occur in man and the higher types of vertebrates, in which they become very dangerous and painful in character, as in the case of cancer. The first and most striking features of this tumor, found in the oyster, is its great size in proportion to that of the animal. The tumor in its largest dimension measures nearly one inch across, with a thickness of fully half an inch. The total length of the animal, in alcohol, is about three inches, and it appears normal in every other respect. For size, in proportion to the dimensions of the animal, it can therefore only be compared to those huge morbid erowths on certain parts of man known as elephantiasis. It is subcircular in outline as viewed from the side, and fills up the pericardiac cavity in front of the adductor muscle; this cavity being very greatly enlarged in consequence of the ‘erowth of the tumor. ‘The larger portion of it also lies on the right side, and on account of its great size it has displaced the heart forwards and to the left. Its consistence is soft and yielding when pressed with the finger, and consists of some eighteen very distinct lobules of irregular size and form. Its joint of attachment appears to be to the mass of tissue which surrounds the posterior-and rectal part of the intestine of the animal, and appears to have grown out in this region, or from the dorsal wall of the heart chamber. Upon removing one of the lobules, which was cut into sections, it was found that its histological structure was also very remark- 3 26 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [ 1887. able, and considerably different from that of the normal tissue of the body-mass of the animal. The sections: also showed that the tumor was traversed by vessels, the tissues immediately around which were more nearly of the kind normally found to constitute the greater part of the substance of the body-mass. The normal connective tissue is composed of large cells or spaces with thin walls, and about the centre of each one of these a small, complex mass of protoplasm is found which is suspended to the sides of its vesicular wall by means of fine radiating pro- toplasmic threads or filaments. Very minute nucleated and rounded blood and lymph cells are also found in the general con- nective tissue of the body-mass in small numbers. The histological structure of the tumor contrasts with the normal tissue in the following particulars. We find no evidence of the presence of the central protoplasmic bodies, with radiating processes, in the meshes of the tissue. The mesh of the tissue of the tumor is areolar, or alveolar, the alveoli being much larger than the vesicular cells of the normal connective tissue. While there is a complete absence of the protoplasmic bodies with fila- ments, the alveoli contain great numbers of very small globular, nucleated: cells, somewhat variable in size. These cells closely resemble the colorless blood and lymph cells of the oyster, and some show processes or pseudopods. They are generally adherent to the walls of the alveoli, or project in small adherent clumps from the parietes of the alveoli and never completely fill the meshes of the alveolar tissue, in which they are included, as do the analogous cells in the alveoli of tumors in the higher animals. Near the centre of each nodule there is a zone of alveoli which are larger, and in which the small rounded cells are most abund- ant. At the surface of the tumor there is no investment of a truly integumentary character, so that the proliferating mass seems to have ruptured the integument or membrane lining the pericardium. At the surface we therefore find that there is no true integument, but instead, the alveoli become smaller and more compact, with the contained small rounded cells more closely packed. The tissues of the tumor are entirely of meso- dermal origin, and are therefore of considerable interest from the standpoint of comparative pathology. The speaker also referred to the presence of tumors, which developed as outgrowths of the intestinal wall, near the pylorus, in the common shad, and also instanced the occurrence of pro- found lesions of the Wolffian body or kidney of the common gold-fish, as a result of which that organ underwent complete degeneration, with other changes which caused a bloated, drop- sical appearence in the cavity of the abdomen. Large meshes of fibrous tissue were, in fact, found occupying the place of the kidney filled with a watery or colloid substance, the whole taking up a much greater space than that originally filled by the normal organ. ‘These data, the speaker thought, were very significant, 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 27 as showing that even the lower animals were not exempt from morbid growths and lesions of the most serious character. Tumors of the kind described in the oyster are probably very rare, however, and the speaker considered that it was very fortu- nate that the specimen had fallen into the hands of a naturalist, such as Professor Leidy, who could so well appreciate its import- ance and value. The tumor seems to have been benign in character, as the oyster in other respects appears to have been healthy. It was also localized, and did not appear in other parts of the animal, so that it was probably i in no way infectious. Modification of Habit in Ants through fear of Enemies.—Dr. Henry C. McCook described a raid of the Sanguine ants, Formica sanguinea, which occurred in a vacant lot at Asbury Park, N. J. The co-operative nest of the two species was established quite near the sidewalk, and the raid was directed thence into the open lot. The marching column of Sanguines was accompanied by a few individuals of the black slaves. What special purpose the latter had he was not able to determine. The eagerness exhibited by the Sanguines upon the march was very noticeable, although these creatures are alw ays active in the nest and at any domestic labor as well as w ar, in which respect they differ largely from the shining slave makers, Polyergus lucidus. On the oceasion of which he spoke, the nest of Fuscous ants, Formica fusca, against which the expedition was directed, was concealed among a large amount of forest rubbish, such as bits of broken ‘chips, twigs, dried leaves, ete., that were scattered over the barren space, interspersed here and there with tufts of grass and low huckleberry bushes. The invaders had evidently located the nest, but not with absolute accuracy; at least they were not able to determine the point at which it might success- fully be assaulted. A most animated scene was presented over the entire surface, some three feet in diameter, upon which was concentrated the united energies of the warriors. Over and around this space in various lines the ants wandered, crossing and criss-crossing each other's pathways, sometimes singly, sometimes in couples or triplets, or in larger crowds, but always exhibiting an attitude of fevered eagerness, applying ‘their mandi- bles and mouth- -parts continually to the ground in search of the point of vantage which would give them ingress to the coveted treasures of the Fuscous ants. A space about ten inches in diameter, strewn with dry chippage seemed to represent the locality beneath which the blacks had established their formicary. The Sanguines energetically pulled away the chips, scattered them here and there, burrowed lightly in the earth hoping to obtain an opening. About two feet distant from this point the speaker discovered a small round entrance or gate which was soon identified as one of the outer approaches to the Fuscous nest, for several of these ants were 28 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. seen issuing from the gate and others were hovering around it. At this moment one of the Sanguine army, in the spirit of a pioneer or scout, approached this point. . Thereupon the blacks climbed up adjacent spears of grass, where they remained apparently on guard. After about ten minutes spent in the exploration which has been described, the reds began to drain off from the centre of search towards their home. In the mean- time a considerable number of the Fuscas, who had evidently been out upon foraging expeditions and were homeward bound for the night, discovering the crowd of enemies who surrounded their borders, had discreetly taken refuge like their associates on the tufts of grass everywhere around the margin of the space within which the Sanguines had been operating. Two of these blacks, more courageous or cunning than their associates, Dr. McCook observed to slip into a little opening and disappear inside. They were presently followed by several Sanguines, who, however, shortly returned from within and pro- ceeded with their surface explorations, apparently having found no clew to the main formicary. The blacks, however, had cer- tainly safely entered their home. He greatly wondered at this, and regarded it as an evidence of remarkable cunning and skill in strategy on the part of the Fuscas, which had enabled them thus so rapidly and easily to close the opening to their nest and throw the invaders off the scent. An hour after the commencement of the raid not more than half a dozen of the Sanguines remained upon the scene, the rest of their company having abandoned the search for this time at least. This corporal’s guard of persistent scouts also gave up the search at last and marched back home, the secretive skill of the blacks having thus far prevailed for the protection of their colony. The interesting fact in the history of these curious creatures to which Dr. McCook wished to call especial attention is, that their instinct for kidnapping has appeared to develope on the part of those who are the victims of it a corresponding strengthening of instinct in the way of concealment. The Fuscous ants are ready enough to defend their homes with their lives and often do it successfully when their numbers are great enough to overcome the superior physical power and warlike skill of their enemies. But the weaker colonies of Fuscas must always yield to the prowess and strength of the Sanguines, unless their cunning can put their invaders at a disadvantage. The case just mentioned does not stand alone. At various times when the speaker had observed these black ants in such site that they are exposed to the attacks of the Sanguines, he had noticed that their nests were constructed very differently from those of colonies in neighborhoods not infested by Sanguines. In the latter positions it is the habit of the Fuscas to raise above the surface of the ground a flattened moundlet, or sometimes a 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 29 mound of considerable size. Over the summit and at the base of these elevations are scattered the gates or openings into the gal- leries without the least attempt at concealment. The whole formicary shows that its inmates dwell in security without any fear of such special perils as those described. On the contrary, the Fuscous colonies established in the near vicinity of their hereditary foes have a marked tendency to omit or subdue eleva- tions above the surface, the dumpage from interior galleries being apparently scattered broadcast instead of piled above the central formicary. Their gates are few and cunningly concealed, and quantities of rubbish are scattered around with the evident inten- tion of hiding the locality of their nest or making the approach to it more difficult. It has thus come about with these unfortu- nate blacks, as is the case with the human species, that the diffi- culties of life and perils to person, offspring and home, have developed a higher order of protective instinct. A similar faculty Dr. McCook had observed in the case of an amber-colored ant, the Schauffuss ant, Formica schauffussi. He was watching the assault of a colony of Sanguines upon a Fuscous nest in the grounds of his friend Mrs. Mary Treat, Vineland, N. J., when he chanced to see a solitary individual Schauffuss moving back and forwards a little distance from the scene of invasion. Knowing that this ant is sometimes enslaved by the Sanguines he directed his attention upon her and easily perceived that she was putting finishing touches upon the closure of a little hole that marked the gate of her formicary. A tiny pebble was placed, then a few pellets of soil were added. Next the worker walked away, took a few turns as though surveying the surroundings, and cautiously came back. The coast was clear. Now she deftly crawled into the small open space, and the observer could see from the movements inside, and occasional glimpses of the tip of her antennz, that she was completing the work of concealment from the inside. At last her task was done and all was quiet. Just then a single Sanguine warrior, appa- rently a straggler from the invader’s army near by, or some inde- pendent scout it may be, approached the spot. It walked around the nest, which was indistinguishable from the surrounding surface; sounded or felt here and there with its antenne; passed over the very door into which the Schauffuss ant had disappeared, and although its suspicions were evidently strongly awakened, it at last moved away. The speaker felt satisfaction that the San- guine depredator had thus been baffled and that the instinct of home protection had proved too much for the wretched kidnap- ping cunning. However, his pleasure was somewhat clouded by the reflection that the slave-making scout would probably be back before long, accompanied by the host of its fellows, and do its work more surely. But the impression remained strong upon his mind that the Schauffuss colonists, like the Fuscous ones above alluded to, had decidedly modified their habits of nest 30 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. architecture to meet the perils arising from close neighborhood to their kidnapping enemies. Notes on the Geology of China.—Prof. Heilprin read from Miss Aver M. Frevpe the following notes on the geology of south- eastern China, which are of interest, inasmuch as nothing on the physical features of that section of the empire has as yet been published. “T have been on atrip up the Han River, 130 miles, to the Pass between the Kwangtung and Fokien Provinces. The moun- tains slope steeply down into the river on both its sides for eighty miles, and a uarrow path runs on each slope parallel with the river at varying distances above it. Some of the mountains are probably three thousand feet high, and the ridges at a distance appear so narrow that a man might stride and sit on them as on a saddle. The river keeps a general trend southward, its bends being short ones. Its delta covers several square miles. In all the lower part of its course it is kept in its channel by dikes, as its sandy bed is higher than the adjoining rice fields. Just above the city of Chow-chow-fu, thirty-two miles to the north of Swatow, the mountains begin to rise, and they are, like those near Swatow, almost wholly of granite. This rock extends up to Liu Ng, a town twenty-four miles further up the river. Stone No. 1, in the box sent herewith, is a specimen of this outcrop near the river. Ten miles further up the granite becomes very coarse, as in No. 2. Ten miles still further, or twenty-six miles from the mouth, the outcrops are, for a short distance, of whitish sandstone, like No. 8, and these are immediately followed by red sandstones, Nos. 4 and 5, which continue in mountain after mountain, gorge after gorge, precipice after precipice, for some sixty miles. These are magnificent exposures, the stratification showing very plainly, with lines of cleavage nearly at right-angles to the lines of deposit. The inclination is at all angles, some being level, some vertical and some showing splendid curves. Here and there are to be found apparent injections of another stone, which, I fancy, may be trap No. 6. I also found some streaks of landscape-sandstone, No. 7. In one place I found a huge mass of the speckled stone, pink, with brown spots, marked No. 8, in the box. This, like all the other specimens, is a portion of the great outcrop from a mountain side, “Red sandstone, in some places, almost like dark shale, in others very hard and of a light color, extends to within ten miles of the pass. Towards its upper boundary I noticed much inter- mixture with light sandstone, and with a greenish stone, No. 9. The stratification of the latter was very plain, and in places the mountain path leads over the edges of the strata as they stand perpendicularly. Near the pass and also through the pass (which is four miles long, and is a wild gorge through which the river flows in a white torrent), the outcrops and boulders are again 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 31 wholly of granite, like that of Liu Ng. Not far below the pass there had been a landslide from one of the mountains, and it gave a fine chance to see the original constitution of the slope. I suppose this sandstone may be Triassic, because it appears to be unfossiliferous. The Chinese do not make vast excavations, but they use stone for bridges, etc. In one place I crossed a new bridge, made of red sandstone, and I examined the quarry from which the stone came. If there were fossils found they would, without doubt, be used as fetiches, and I should hear of them. The natives said no queer thing had been found or seen in the stones. ‘There was no sign or speck of a fossil to be found about the quarry.” The specimens of stone accompanying the notes were com- mented upon by Prof. Heilprin, who stated that they would be the subject of further study and report. The district here described is an interesting one to geologists, inasmuch as it had hitherto received but little attention upon the part of the travel- ers. Much of the rock surface is probably identical with that. observed by Richthofen in the region to the west and north, the details of which have not yet been published in his work on China. The red sandstone (Nos. 4 and 5) described by Miss Fielde as a possible representative of the Trias, is apparently a member of the series referred by Richthofen to the Jurassic period—so identified by the plant remains. Chinese Rhizopods—Miss FIELDE also announced that during her study of the fresh-water Rhizopods found in the streams around Swatow, she had collected several forms identical with those described by Dr. Leidy, from the neighborhood of Phila- delphia (Difflugia urceolata, D. pyriformis, Arcella vulgaris). The following was ordered to be printed :— 32 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. ON NEW GENERIC FORMS OF CRETACEOUS MOLLUSCA AND THEIR RELATION TO OTHER FORMS. BY CHARLES A. WHITE. Published by permission of the Director of the United States Geological Survey. The type species of the three generic forms which are described in this article ! belong to the collections of Cretaceous fossils from Texas, which I am now preparing for publication in one of the memoirs of the U. S. Geological Survey. In their generic charac- teristics all three of them appear to be respectively identical with certain forms which have long been known, but which have been referred to other genera by different authors. The features which I now present as having generic value seem to have been overlooked by those authors, or, so far as they were observed, they were treated as specific characters. Two of these forms belong to the section Melinine of the family Aviculide. The other is referred to the Crassatellide, but it departs considerably from the typical section of that family. CRASSATELLIDA. Genus STEARNSIA (gen. nov.). Shell compressed, subtrihedral or subcircular in marginal out- line; beaks small, closely approximate, prominent by reason of the abrupt sloping away of both the antero-and postero-dorsal borders; lunule and escutcheon both well defined and flattened or excavated; hinge strong, consisting of both cardinal and lateral teeth; cardinal teeth two in the left valve and three in the right; both posterior and anterior lateral teeth long aud slender; posterior laterals two in the right valve and one in the left; anterior laterals two in the left valve and one in the right. If, however, the overlapping border of the right valve and the enter- ing border of the left, within the lunule, and the overlapping border of the left valve and the entering border of the right, within the escutcheon, be regarded as teeth, the number of both the anterior and posterior laterals is two in each valye; ligament 1The names under which I have described these forms respectively are Dalliconcha, Stearnsia and Aguileria. They are given in honor of Dr. W. H. Dall and Dr. R. E. C. Stearns of the U. S. Geological Survey, and of Sefior José G. Aguilera, of ‘the Mexican Geographical and Exploring Commission. PI. Il. PROC, ACAD. NAT. SCI. PHILA. 1887, WHITE, NEW CRETACEOUS MOLLUSCA. 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 33 small, mainly internal; free margins apparently smooth; pallial line apparently simple. This genus agrees with Crassatel/la in having both lunule and escutcheon clearly defined, in the general character of the hinge, exclusive of the lateral teeth, in the nearly internal position of the ligament, and, apparently, in having a simple pallial line. It differs from Orassatella in its small and compressed beaks, the laterally compressed form of the shell, in its greater number of cardinal teeth; and in the long and slender character of both the anterior and posterior lateral teeth. It agrees with Astarte in having both lunule and escutcheon well defined; but it differs from that genus in having a greater number of cardinal teeth; in its well developed anterior and posterior lateral teeth; and in having its ligament mainly internal. It agrees with Circe (as represented by C. scripta, Lin.) in its laterally compressed form, especially that of the umbonal region, and in the number of its cardinal teeth. It differs from Circe in having its ligament mainly internal; in the long and slender character of the anterior lateral teeth, and in the posses- sion of posterior lateral teeth. It agrees with Eryphila in having both lunule and escutcheon well defined, and, approximately, in the charagter of its posterior and anterior lateral teeth. It differs from that genus in having a greater number of cardinal teeth, and in having its ligament mainly internal. It has somewhat the aspect of Gouldia, but it differs from that genus in having slender, well developed posterior, as well as anterior lateral teeth. It has also a greater number of cardinal teeth than Gouldia and its ligament is differently situated and partly external. The only species of this genus which I have satisfactorily examined is the one which is described in the following paragraph. This I regard as the type of the genus, bnt it is likely that the Astarte carinata of d’Orbigny’ is congeneric with it. Stearnsia Robinsi (sp. nov.) PI. II, figs, 7—9. : Shell much compressed, trihedrak in marginal outline; lunule long and narrow, nearly straight from end to end, concave trans- versely; escutcheon similar in shape and character to the lunule, but longer; beaks small, appressed, angular; ligament slightly 1 See Palcont. Francaise, Ter. Cret. iii, pl. 262, figs. 1. and 2. 34 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. exposed, and it appears to have been divided into an outer and inner portion by a calcareous septum; umbonal furrows distinct, producing an emargination at the posterior part of the convex basal border and a considerable prominence of the posterior extremity; hinge strong; the lateral teeth slender and extending the full length of the lunule and escutcheon respectively; surface marked by strong concentric furrows and ridges, which end abruptly at the margins of the lunule and escutcheon respectively ; the surface of both lunule and escutcheon plain, AVICULIDA. Genus DALLICONCHA (gen. nov.). Shell resembling Gervillia in general form, in the character of the test, in the muscular markings, and in the possession of a pit-bearing diverging hinge area upon each valve. The valves are more or less nearly equal in convexity; beaks terminal, divergent; the upper borders of the hinge areas converging from the widely separated beaks to the posterior end of the wing, where the areas come in contact with each other by their full width; posterior wing elongate, clearly defined from the body of the shell; anterior wing absent, the anterior extremity of each valve being inflexed so as to form, when both valves are together, a three-lobed depression in the front portion of the shell, one lobe of which ends at the extremity of each of the divergent beaks and the other below, at the contact of the antero-basal margins of the valves. At the bottom of the depression there is a distinct byssal aperture, to form which both valves are nearly or quite equally notched. The articulating portion of the hinge of each valve is marked by more or less distinct crenulations which cross it obliquely downward and backward, and which are sometimes visible upon the surface of the areas above the articu- lating border. At the anterior end of the hinge these crenula- tions are approximately perpendicular, and sometimes denticulate in character, and at the posterior end they sometimes assume the form of slender, nearly horizontal lateral teeth, above which are more nearly transverse crenulations. Dalliconcha agrees with Gervillia in the characteristics already mentioned; but it differs from the typical forms of that genus mainly in the inflection of the anterior extremity of the valves, and the consequent terminal position of the beaks, and absence 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 35 of an anterior ear. It also differs in wanting the large, longitu- dinal teeth which characterize true Gervillia—as seen, for example, in G. difficilis @Orbigny, and G. anceps Deshayes.' The byssal aperture is also more clearly defined than in Gervillia. In these differing features it agrees approximately with Perna; but it differs conspicuously from Perna in its much more elon- gate form, in the distinct definition of the posterior wing, the smaller number of ligamental pits, and in the crenulation of the hinge. This genus is more nearly related to Gervillia than to any other genus of the Aviculide, the relation between the two genera being somewhat similar to that which exists between the living forms of Avicula and the Carboniferous genus Monopteria of Meek and Worthen. The species which is described in the following paragraph is proposed as the type of Dalliconcha, but the Gervillia ensiformis of Conrad is an equally typical species. The G. aviculoides of Defrance (not Sowerby) and G. solenoides Defrance seem also to belong to this genus, as doubtless do several other forms which have been referred to Gervillia. Dalliconcha invaginata (nov.sp.). Pl. II, figs. 4 and 5. Shell long and slender; the dorsum gently concave from beak to posterior end, and transversely flattened by the abrupt inflec- tion of the dorsal border of each valve; wing well developed ; the anterior depression rather deep; beaks prominent; byssal aperture moderately large, oval; hinge-areas each bearing five or six ligamental pits, which are of unequal size; the spaces between the pits marked by irregular oblique crenulations, Genus AGUILERIA (gen. nov.). Shell resembling Perna in general form, in the character of the test, in its muscular markings, and in the possession of a_pit- bearing, diverging hinge area upon each valve. The valves are more or less nearly equal in convexity; a more or less distinct furrow passes from the dorsal border of each valve, near the apex of the beak, to the anterior margin, defining a projecting, more or less inflated anterior portion of the shell, which is homologous with the anterior ear of Margaritophora. The beaks are not prominent, situated anteriorly, but not terminal ; ligamental pits distinct, but not numerous. The articulating 1cee Paleont. Francaise, Ter. Cret., iii, pl. 394, fig. 8; and pl. 396, fig. 7 36 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. portion of the hinge of both valves of the adult examples of the type species is marked by crenulations or denticles, which cross the hinge at nearly right angles in front, but at the posterior por- tion their course is obliquely downward and backward. In the type species a small blunt tooth is observable at the anterior end of the hinge of the left valve; and there is a larger, more oblique one at the posterior end of the hinge. There are corresponding pits in the left valve to receive these teeth, and some specimens also show a slight elevation at the side of the anterior and posterior dental pits respectively, suggesting that they represent incipient teeth in that valve. Byssal aperture obscure or absent. This genus agrees with Perna in the characters which have already been mentioned, but it differs from Perna in the retreat- ing position of the beak, in the projecting instead of inflected anterior extremity of the shell beneath the beaks, in the crenula- lation of the articulating portion of the hinge, in the smaller number of ligamental pits, and in the absence of a well-defined byssal notch in either valve. It agrees with Margaritophora, as shown, for example, by the living species M. pica Gould, from the southern Pacific Ocean, in the character of the test, in the muscular markings, in the pos- session of blunt teeth upon the anterior and posterior portions of the hinge, and in the retreating position of the beaks. It differs from Margaritophora in having well-developed ligamental pits in its hinge areas, a crenulate or denticulate, instead of a smooth hinge border, and in the absence of a compressed anterior ear, and of a distinct byssal notch. Bakevellia has some characteristics similar to those of this genus, but its ligamental pits are fewer in number and occupy only the middle portion of the hinge, while its lateral teeth are two or three in number at each end of the hinge, and they are nearly parallel to the hinge border; the latter being smooth and not crenulate. Besides this there is some reason to doubt whether Bakevellia really belongs to the family Aviculide, as do Perna and its congeners; and to which family this new genus is referred. The species which is described in the following paragraph is proposed as the type of Aguileria. Sefior Aguilera has shown me some examples of a species which he obtained from the Cre- 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 37 taceous rocks of the State of Puebla, Mexico, which is probably congeneric with this Texan form. It is probable also that the Gervillia Renauxiana of Matheron, and other published forms, ought to be referred to the genus here proposed. A form from the Cretaceous of Brazil, described by me some years ago under the name of Gervillia dissita, but still unpublished, seems to belong to this genus. If those species should be assigned to this genus it may be that the crenulation of the hinge will be found to be an inconstant character; but the other characters which are _ herein described are regarded as a sufficient basis for its generic identity. Aguileria Cumminsi (sp. nov.). Pl. Il, figs. 1-3. Shell inflated, obliquely subelliptical in marginal outline; test thick, hinge line moderately long; hinge areas broad, bearing three or four ligamental pits; hinge border including the surface of the cardinal teeth, distinctly crenulated in adult examples; posterior cardinal tooth moderately large; anterior one small and indistinct. EXPLANATION OF PLATE II. Aguileria cumminst White. , Fic. 1. Left side view of an adult example. Fic. 2. Dorsal view of the same. Fic. 8. Interior view of a left valve, somewhat narrowed by lateral compression, showing the hinge and cardinal area. Dalliconcha invaginata W. Fic. 4. Right side view of a restored outline, reduced to three-fourths natural size. Fic. 5. Front view of an adult example, restored as to its outline from a partially crushed condition. Dalliconcha ensiformis Conrad, sp. Fic. 6. A left valve, showing hinge and front features; introduced for comparison. Stearnsia robbinsi W. Fic. 7. Left side view of a medium-sized example. Fic. 8. Dorsal view of the same. Fic. 9. An imperfect example, showing the hinge of the left valve. All the figures except 4 are of natural size. 38 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. FEBRUARY 1. The President, Dr. JosepH Lerpy, in the chair. Twenty-two persons present. Papers under the following titles were presented for publication ; “On the Cretaceous Formations of Texas, and their reations to those of other portions of North America,” by Charles A. White. “On Zine—Manganese Asbestos,” by George A. Koenig, Ph. D. Parasite of a Bat.——Dr. Leipy remarked that it was a common opinion among country people that swallows and bats were infested with bed-bugs and often introduced them into houses. He had convinced himself that the Cimex infesting the cliff swallow was a different species from the bed-bug." He had repeatedly examined bats without finding Cimex. On one of two small bats, from Panama Bay, presented this evening by Dr. Wm. H. Jones, he found two singular insects, which appear to be the Polyctenes fumarius, described by Prof. Westwood from a bat of Jamaica. They are about half of the size given for the species, but otherwise appear to agree in all respects. It has four jointed antennz, with the first pair of limbs short and the other pair long. The insect has distinct hemiclytra. On a Peculiar Form of Molybdenite—Dr. Gro. A. Kornie called attention to a specimen of Molybdenite from the German- town quarries, presented by Mr. Thomas Meehan. The Molyb- denite forms a perfect cylinder, 2 inches long hy +2 inch diameter. It shows a lamellar structure, but the leaves are twisted and felted together. Owing to the remarkable shape the speaker had supposed the substance to be graphite and placed by some persons—quarrymen—in a + inch drill-hole, ramming it down tightly. Blowpipe tests, however, show the substance to be Molybdenite. In the open tube a peculiar odor was noticed not quite like that of Selenium but near it, and it was believed to be desirable that a quantitative analysis should be made. FEBRUARY 8. Mr Tuomas MEEHAN, Vice- President, in the chair. Fourteen persons present. A paper entitled “On Invertebrates from the Eocene of Mis- sissipp1 and Alabama,” by Otto Meyer, was presented for pub- lication. The following were ordered to be printed.— 1 Proc. 1877, 284. 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 39 ON THE CRETACEOUS FORMATIONS OF TEXAS AND THEIR RELATION TO THOSE OF OTHER PORTIONS OF NORTH AMERICA. BY CHARLES A. WHITE. Published by permission of the Director of the U. S. Geological Survey. The true relations of the different Cretaceous formations which have long been known to exist within the State of Texas to each other, and to those which have been recognized in other portions of North America, have not hitherto been satisfactorily known. Several eminent geologists have written upon the subject, and considerable diversity of opinion has prevailed among them. The former impracticability of obtaining information by personal observation over any considerable portion of that great region; the destruction by the civil war of the work so well begun by Dr. Shumard, and the limited knowledge then possessed by any one of the general geology of North America, were doubtless the causes which prevented a satisfactory solution of this question. Now numerous railroads traverse the State, the hostile tribes which barred the progress of travelers have been quieted or removed, and a good outline of the geology of the continent is known. With the opportunity of availing myself of these advantages I entered last year upon an investigation of the Texas Cretaceous, placing the field work in charge of my chief assistant, Mr. Robert T. Hill. In the latter part of the season I traversed the State in various directions in company with Mr. Hill, reviewing his work and making additional observations. The following section is the result of these labors, and I am so well convinced of the accuracy of its essential features that I do not hesitate to adopt it as the basis of my paleontological and museum work in relation to the Texas Cretaceous, although the order of superposition therein given is so different from what it has been generally sup- posed to be. The remarks at the right hand side of the column, which repre- sents the section, are by Mr Hill, who has with considerable care compared this section with those which have hitherto been published as representing the Texas Cretaceous. 4() PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. General Section of the Cretaceous Strata of the Eastern half of ke Navarro Beps. Texas. 7. Strata in Navarro County, given this name by B. F. Shumard and correlated with the Ripley Group in 1861; but not placed in his general section of 1860; correlated with Ripley Group at ‘lerrell by R. H Loughridge; 10th Census Report, Vol. V. Included by Roemer, together with 4 and 5 of this section, in his ‘‘Kreidebildungen am Fusse des Hoch- landes.”’” Outcrops along a narrow area upon the western border of the Gulf States Tertiary. 6. Outcrops to the west of No. 7, occupying the so-called Black Prairie region. Of great thickness and uniformity of | Dinosaur SANDs. : 6 character. Recognized by Owen as extending into Arkansas, wn : and as equivalent with the rotten limestone of Mississippi, = AusTIN named ‘‘Austin Limestone’? by B. F. Shumard in 1860, and placed in his section between Nos. 2 and 3 of this section, but ea} LIMESTONE. its true relation not then recognized. Included by Roemer n with No. 7. Sherman, Dallas, Waco, Austin and New Braun- By fels are approximately upon the western border of the out- 5 crop. Oo 5. 5. Yellow arenaceous, and blue argillaceous shales, narrow exposure west, and along the northern half of No 6. Is the EaGie Forp lower part of Shumard’s Austin limestone, and also the nee ‘‘Arenaceous Group’ and ‘‘Fish Bed’’ of his Lower Cre- : taceous. 4, 4. Coarse ferruginous sands and clays; fossiliferous. Has been alluded to by various writers as ‘‘Tertiary,’’ ‘‘Miocene,”’ TimBeR CREEK “‘Quaternary,’’ etc. Its outcrop is coextensive with the region B know as the Lower Cross Timbers. It apparently rests un- EBS: conformably upen No. 3. 8. Strata of this division at Fort Washita, I. T., partially described in 1854, and called ‘‘Senonien’’ by G. G. Shumard, wrongly placed by B. F. Shumard, in his section, immediately 3. beneath No. 6 of this section. More comprehensively de- scribed by Jules Marcou in 1855, and referred to the Neoconian. WaAsHITA Is not distinctly separable from No. 2, either by the character of the strata or fossil contents. Outcrop occupies a_ narrow ’ Divison. belt extending southward from old Fort Washita via Denison. N Denton, Fort Worth, Salado, Austin, and westward of San a Antonio; was included together with No. 2 by Roemer in his 4 “«Kreidebildungen des Hochlandes.”’ an = . . en) 2. In 1848 this division was included by Roemer in his 1S) *‘Kreidebildungen des Hochlandes,’’ as seen in buttes north a 2. of Fredericksburg. It is also a Hic 3 Peak ai , the ‘‘Caprina Limestone’? and ‘‘Caprotina Limestone’ o : a PERUSE ES aUats F. Ghumsed in 1860. These authors places all except the last | 3 Division. named strata at the top of the whole Texas Cretaceous series. Outcrops along the borders of the paleozoic areas in Central Texas. AE 1. Coarse silicious sand,, popularly called ‘‘pack-sand.’’ Occurs between the base of the fossiliferous Cretaceous and the carboniferous series. Contains vertebrate remains. 1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 41 The fossils which have been collected from the strata of this Texas section, have not yet been fully studied with reference to the different formations which they represent. That work has, however, so far progressed as to give some important indications as to the equivalency of certain of these Texas formations with those which different geologists have investigated in the regions to the eastward, westward, and northward from that State; and also to show that a large part of the Texas Cretaceous section is not represented by any of the formations referred to. The following table will serve to formulate these indications, but as the recognition of equivalency is more satisfactory in some cases than in others, each case is considered separately in the following paragraplis :— MisstssiPPt Texas SECTION. WESTERN SECTION. Urrer Missourt SECTION. RIVER SECTION. Ripley Group. Navarro Beds, Fox Hills Group. te wie aie Rotten Limestone. | Austin Limestone. { Nos 2 & 3,or Ft. Benton Tombigbee Sand. Eagle Ford Shales Colorado Group. and Niobrarra Groups. Eutaw Group. Timber Creek Beds. Dakota Group. No. 1, or Dakota Group. Wanting. Washita Division. Wanting. Wanting. Wanting. Fredericksb’g Division. | Wanting. Wanting. Before making comparisons of the Texas section with the others of this table, it is necessary to make some explanations with reference to the relations of the latter to each other. The Mississippi section indicated in the foregoing table is that which was published by Prof. E. W. Hilgard in his official report upon the geology of the State of Mississippi." The western section is a modification, first proposed by King,’ of the well- known Upper Missouri River section of Meek and Hayden, which is represented by the right-hand column. King, however, placed the equivalents of Nos. 3, 4 and 5 of the Upper Missouri section all together under the name of Fox Hill Group. This being an unnatural grouping of the strata upon paleontological grounds, I still further modified it by placing Nos. 2 and 3 together under King’s name of Colorado Group; and Nos. 4 and 5 together under one of the original names of Fox Hills Group 1 Geology and Agriculture of Mississippi, 1860, p. 3; 2U.S. Geol. Expl., 40th Parallel, vol. i, pp. 305, 306. 3 Ann. Report U. S. Geol. Surv. Terr. for 1876, p. 22. 42 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887 These two consolidated groups, together with the Dakota Group, the separate identity of which all geologists have recognized, con- stitute the western Cretaceous section of the foregoing table. The New Mexican Section of Prof. Newberry seems to be practically identical with the western section of the foregoing table. He seems to indicate, however, that there is in that region a blending of the Dakota Group with the next overlying forma- tion. It may be noted also that at least one of the species which Mr. Meek describes in that report as coming from the middle division of the New Mexican Section? is now known to belong to a lower horizon than that of the base of his section, namely, to that of the Comanche division of the Texas section. Southward from Dakota and Montana I have never been able to separate the equivalent of No. 4 from that of No. 5 of Meek and Hayden’s section, either stratigraphically or paleontologi- eally. It is for this reason that I have referred all strata that carry any of the fossils which they indicated as characterizing either of those divisions to the Fox Hills’ Group alone. On the other hand, while Nos. 2 and 3 are so closely related to each other paleontologically that they are now generally regarded as constituting one natural group, an upper and a lower lithological division of the same are quite as clearly recognizable in southern Colorado and northern New Mexico as in the Upper Missouri River region. It is a significant fact that while the separate identity of the Dakota group has been indicated by specific identity of plant remains, which are found over a large region, as well as by stratigraphical position, there is a marked difference in the char- acter of the invertebrate fossils from different localities. I refer especially to those which Mr. Meek’* and myself* have published as coming from strata of that group in Central Kansas, as com- pared with the few which have been found in southeastern Dakota. The Kansas forms are mainly or wholly of marine origin, but they are such as may have lived in littoral waters; while those of southeastern Dakota are of different species, and indicate a 1 Newberry’s Geol. Rept. Expl. Exped. from Santa Fe to Junction of Grand and Green Rivers, pp. 32, 121, 122. 2 Ib., p. 126, pl. i, figs. 7 a, 0d. 3 Ann. Report U. S. Geol. Sur. Terr. for 1870, pp. 297, 301-313; Vol. IX U. S. Geol. Sur. Terr., p. 24. * Proc. U.S. National Museum, Vol. 2, pp. 295, 296, pl. 5. 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 43 less saline condition. It is also significant that, with the excep- tion of some marine mollusca which Mr. Meek doubtfully referred to the Dakota group in New Mexico,' no other invertebrates than those which the Kansas and Dakota localities have furnished, have been reported as coming from that group. The facts which have been mentioned, others which will be referred to, and our present knowledge of the general geology of that western region, all seem to indicate that while the greater part of the Dakota group, as it is now known, is a non-marine deposit, we ought to expect to find it to merge into a marine deposit to the southward. Now in making comparisons of the Texas Cretaceous rocks with those which have been observed in other parts of the conti- nent, we find that the whole Comanche series represents older strata than are included in any of the other published sections of North American Cretaceous except perhaps that of California.’ The strata of the Comanche series are known to extend north- ward from Texas into the Indian Territory, and some of its characteristic fossils have been found in southeastern Kansas. Fossils belonging to this series have also been found at various points in western Texas and the adjacent southeastern part of New Mexico. They have also been found at various points in Mexico, one locality being upon the western side of the Sierra Madre, in the Mexican State of Sonora.’ Judging from all the information which I have been able to obtain, I infer that none of the strata of the Comanche series extend beyond the eastern boundaries of Texas, nor further northward than southern Kansas. It seems probable also, that while this series is well developed, both faunally and _strati- graphically, in Texas, it has, or originally had, its greatest development within the region which is now the Republic of Mexico. Again, judging from present information, there seems to be a complete faunal break at the top of the Comanche series. That is, I am not yet aware that a single fossil species of that series passes up into any of the upper members of the Texas Creta- ceous Section. The Comanche series is therefore not only greatly restricted in its geographical extension to the eastward and 1 Newberry’s Geol. Report before cited, p. 121. 2 White; Bull U. S. Geol. Surv., No, Vol: 15, p. III, 1885. 8 Gabb; Paleontology of California, Vol. II, p. 257. 44 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. northward, but there seems also to be a clear line of demarkation between that series and the upper one, within the State of Texas. No unconformity of the strata of the upper series upon those of the latter has yet been satisfactorily observed, but it can hardly be doubted that there is at least a brief chronological break between the two series. This latter question, however, I am not now prepared to discuss. From the foregoing remarks it will be seen that it is the forma- tions of the upper series alone which can now be discussed with reference to equivalency with the formations represented by the other sections of the foregoing table. Beginning with the lowest member of the upper, or Gulf series, namely, the Timber Creek beds, I regard those strata as, at least in part, equivalent with the Dakota group of the Western and upper Missouri sections, and perhaps equivalent with the Eutaw group of the Mississippi section. Of the latter supposed equivalency I have no paleonto- logical evidence; and the suggestion is made mainly in conse- quence of the stratigraphical position of the Eutaw group. That the Timber Creek beds are equivalent with the Dakota group is indicated not only by the position of each with refer- ence to overlying formations, but I have recognized some of the species which were first found in the Dakota strata of central Kansas, in the Timber Creek beds of Denton County, Texas. The Eagle Ford shales are recognized as equivalent with the bluish shales, or lower portion of the Colorado group as it is known in Colorado and the adjoining territories. That is, I have recognized certain of the species of the Eagle Ford shales as identical with some which occur in the Colorado group to the northwestward of Texas. The lithological character of the shales of both regions is also similar. As to the equivalency of the Eagle Ford shales with the Tombigbee sand of the Mississippi section, the only reason I now have for offering that suggestion is its stratigraphical position. That the Austin limestone is equivalent, both stratigraphically and paleontologically, with the rotten limestone of the Missis- sippi section, as has been shown by other authors, there seems to be no reason to doubt. I also regard those Texan strata as equivalent with the upper division of the Colorado group. The Texan strata are not only quite similar in lithological character 1887. | NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 45 to those of that division as it is known in southern Colorado and New Mexico, but I have recognized several species of fossils as common to the Austin limestone and those more northern strata. The paleontological evidence that the Navarro beds are equivalent with the Ripley group of the Mississippi section, as presented by Shumard,’ seems to be beyond question. It is also known that several molluscan species which characterize the equivalents of the Navarro beds in the Cretaceous of the Gulf and Atlantic coast regions, are not uncommon in the Fox Hills group of the Western section. The Fox Hills groups of the Western section is clearly recog- nizable as such in the valley of the Rio Grande, in western Texas, where it is found to contain a number of the characteristic species of the group. The evidence is conclusive, also, that the Fox Hills strata there, are, or originally were, directly continuous with those of that epoch which are found to the northward.’ Of the present, or former, direct stratigraphical continuity of the western Fox Hills strata with their presumed equivalents in Eastern Texas, and in the Gulf and Atlantic coast regions, present evidence is not so clear. Although the identity of certain species, found in those eastern and western strata respectively, is beyond reasonable question, there is a decided difference, both paleontological and lithological, between them. Still, there seems to be good reason for regarding them as having been synchronously deposited. Their differences were perhaps largely due to the presence of a land area between an eastern and a western marine area during the Fox Hills-Ripley epoch, to the southward of which the two marine areas coalesced. This view seems to find corroboration in the fact that most of the species which are common to both the eastern and western strata, are open sea forms, and conse- quently had a wide geographical range. Those species which differ most in the two regions respectively, are apparently such as had a more restricted range. We now come to consider the relation of the Fox Hills strata and the Navarro Beds respectively, to overlying formations. It appears to be unquestionable that the Lignite Tertiary Beds of eastern Texas rest directly upon the Navarro Beds, just as the 1 Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., viii, p. 189. 2 This volume, pp. 18-20. 46 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. equivalent Tertiary strata rest upon the Ripley Group in Missis- sippi; but in Texas the actual contact seems not yet to have been seen by a competent observer. The faunal difference also, between the Navarro and the Lignite Beds, plainly indicate a change in physical conditions, and also a chronological break of some extent. The break, however, may have been only a brief one. On the other hand, the strata of the Fox Hills Group in the region of the Rio Grande are directly overlaid by those of the Laramie Group, the two formations so blending together that no sharply defined plane of demarkation between them can be recognized. Thus we find the stratigraphical series in that western region to be an unbroken one up to the top of the Laramie Group; while the eastern series is broken at the top of the Navarro Beds. We are therefore still in doubt as to the true stratigraphical relation of the Laramie Group with the Eocene Tertiary of the Gulf region. If that relation is ever discovered, it now seems certain that we shall find it in the southwestern part of Texas, or the adjacent part of Mexico. The Dakota Group of the western and upper Missouri sections rests directly upon Jurassic strata, which in turn rest upon a series known as the “Red Beds,” and usually regarded as of Triassic age. Those Red Beds are there found to rest upon the Carboniferous, or upon older paleozoic rocks. No equivalent of the Jurassic strata referred to have been recognized in connec- tion with the Texas Cretaceous section as given in this article; and they seem to have entirely thinned out before reaching the region of Central Texas. In that region, the strata next under- lying the Comanche series are clearly either those of the Carboniferous, or of the Red Beds. The latter are not known to exist to the eastward of the Carboniferous area of Northern Central Texas, but they reach considerable thickness upon the western side of that area, where they are usually known as the Gypsum formation. It appears from the investigations upon which this article is based that certain of the members of the Texas Cretaceous section have not heretofore been recognized, and that the true order of superposition of the formations has been misunderstood, the theoretical section of Marcou' being more nearly correct than any heretofore published. It also appears that while the lower 1Proc Boston Soc. Nat. History, Vol. VIII, p. 93. 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 47 series of that section is not represented in any of the other published sections in North America, the upper series may be satisfactorily correlated with the western and upper Missouri sections; and in part, at least, with the Cretaceous formations of the Gulf, and Atlantic coast regions. In making these investigations the really valuable work of Dr. B. F. Shumard has been adopted so far as practicable, and a large proportion of the fossil species which he published, but did not figure, have been recognized. The admirable work of Prof. Roemer also is found to be as useful to-day as it was when it was first published, forty years ago. ON ZINC—MANGANESE, ASBESTOS. BY GEORGE A KOENIG, PH. D. During a visit to the Franklin Zinc Mines in 1879, I obtained from Mr. George, then Superintendent of the Trotter mine a considerable quantity of Sussexite. Among this there was some material which did not quite look like the rest, and was subjected to an investigation. This material I will designate A. After finding it of interest, I obtained from my friend and colleague, Dr. F. A. Genth, a bluish asbestiform mineral from the same locality; this will be designated as material B. Both appear as stiff, rather columnar fibres, and effervesce with acid. But after treatment with dilute HCL, a fine silky mass ot fibres remain, and these were analyzed. The needles appeared under the microscope slightly yellowish or colorless, whilst the substance in bulk appeared bluish, like crocidolite or brown black. These needles fuse readily before the blow-pipe with intumes- cence to a black globule, and behave thus like Sussexite. But no color is given to the flame, so characteristically green in Sussexite. 48 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. After extracting with acid, whereby A gave 73 asbestos, 27 calcite, and material B gave 85 asbestos, 15 calcite, the residue was thoroughly dried at 130°C., and then analyzed as follows:— A. B. SiO? — 55:84 53°50 ALO? = — 1:36 FeO? = —— 8-12 MgO = 19°58 1458 CaO = 10-00 6:62 MnO = 479 1:70 yO = 459 7-10 FeO = 2:40 4:68 HO = 3:20 3°34 100-40 101-00 The molecular ratio is formed for— SiO’: (Mg, Ca, Fe, Zn, Mn H’) O A. 1°8613 1:9716 1:00 1:06 (Mg, Ca, Fe, Zn, Mn H’) SiO? SiO? : (AI’Fe)’: Mg, Ca, Zn Fe H’) O B. 1°7833 : 0°1279 : 1°6911 Or, if we add the sesquioxides to the protoxides— 17833 = 1:00 C016 1:8190 We have here then two Bisilicates, remarkable for the poly- basic composition, which are either pyroxene or amph‘bole asbestiform. I am inclined to classify them as amphibolic. It is probable that these silicates are in a number of collections under the name of Sussexite, with which notably the material A shows much resemblance. 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 49 Frespruary 15. Mr. Gro. W. Tryon Jr. in the chair. Twenty-four persons present. Grampus Rissoanus on the American Coast.—Prof. Hrtuprin called attention to the recent stranding on the New Jersey coast, at Atlantic City, of Risso’s whale, Grampus Rissoanus, a form readily distinguished from other allied cetaceans by the peculiar slaty lines which are irregularly distributed over the body. The speaker thought that this was the first instance of this singular Mediterranean species having been recorded from the trans-Atlantic waters, and emphasized the difficulty of drawing lines of delimitation to the oceanic faunas. The specimen in question was dark-slaty in color on the sides, verging to black on the back and measured about eleven feet in length. FEBRUARY 22. Mr. CHarves Morris in the chair. Nineteen persons present. Origin of the Excretory System in the Earth-worm.—Professor Epmunp B. Witson, of Bryn Mawr, Pa., laid before the Academy an account of his observations on the development of Lumbricus olidus, calling especial attention to the remarkable similarity that exists between the development of the nephridia and the origin of the excretory system in the vertebrates. The gastrula is formed by a process of invagination. Upon the establishment of the germ-bands, they are found to be essentially similar to those of Clepsine, ending behind in eight large cells, by the continued division of which the bands increase in length as the embryo grows. Two of these large cells are mesoblasts (giving rise to the dis- sepiments, muscles and vessels) two are neuroblasts (giving rise to the ventral nerve-cord), two are nephroblasts (giving rise to the excretory organs)and two give rise to cells whose fate could not be determined. From each of these cells a row of cells extends for- wards on the ventral side of the body between the ectoblast and entoblast. The rows are at first one cell wide, but are converted in front into solid cords, several cells in thickness. The principal interest of the development lies in the origin and fate of the rows 50 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. produced by the nephroblasts; these rows are designated as the nephridial rows. In each somite a solid outgrowth from each ne- phridial row takes place into the coelom and is ultimately conver- ted into the nephridium of the corresponding side. Thus the nephridia arise as metameric outgrowths from a solid cord of cells that lies in the somatopleure; and their mode of development is therefore essentially similar to that of the segmental tubes of the vertebrate head-kidney or pro-nephros. An examination of the origin of the nephroblast demonstrates the fact that it is originally an ectoblastic cell, which extends to the surface of the body and is only in rather late stages to be distin- guished from other ectoblastic cells by its greater size and by the fact that it sinks below the surface. It always remains, however, embedded in the ectoblast, and unquestionably is derived from that layer. The nephridial rows and the nephridia to which they give rise are therefore ectoblastic structures. This conclusion is believed by Prof. Wilson to establish two interesting homologies, namely: between the nephridial row of Lumbricus and the Wolffian or segmental duct of the vertebrates, and between the series of nephridia of annelides and the vertebrate head-kidney or pro-nephros. It has very recently been shown that in Raja, Rana, Lacerta, guinea-pig and the rabbit, the segmental duct is derived directly from the ectoblast by a mode of development essentially like that of the nephridial row of Lwmbricus. Hatschek, Eduard Meyer and Lang have already called attention to the close resemblance between the Wolffian duct of vertebrates and the longitudinal canal that unites the nephridia in the larval Polygordius and in certain adult annelides. Prof. Wilson’s observations, taken in connection with those of Meyer supply the embryological proof that the two structures are actually homologous, and that the. excretory systems of annelides and of vertebrates are constructed upon fundamentally the same type and originate by similar modes of development. Attention was called to the direct bearing of this _result on current theories relating to the origin of the Vertebrata. Marcu 1. The President, Dr Jos. Lrrpy, in the chair. Twenty-six persons present. A paper entitled “The Summit Plates in Blastoids, Crinoids and Cystids and their morphological Relations,” By Charles Wachsmuth and Frank Springer, was presented for publication. The following was ordered to be printed :— ada. 1887. l Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phi O. Meyer, del. Meyer, Eocene Invertebrates. 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 51 ON INVERTEBRATES FROM THE EOCENE OF MISSISSIPPI AND ALABAMA. BY OTTO MEYER. Ph. D. In the illustrations to the following paper, the figures of some insufficiently known species of the Southern Old-Tertiary are included. Notes on these are given. The species referred to are mostly small ones. All the mentioned material has been collected by me and is in my collection. Odostomia Boettgeri n.sp. PI. III fig. 4. Subulate, polished. Nucleus sinistral, vertical, partly hidden, Adult whorls eight, with an impressed line below the suture. Suture distinct. Mouth subelliptical. Inner lip with a strong, nearly horizontal fold. At some distance from the outer lip there are within six raised revolving lines. Vicksburg, Miss. “Lower Vicksburgian.” Turbonilla major n.sp. Pil. IIT fig. 3. Nucleus sinistral, its axis horizontal, its volutions separate. Adult whorls many, subconvex, covered with strong transverse ribs and densely spirally striated. The spirals do not extend over the ribs. Mouth subquadrangular. Inner lips with a strong oblique fold. Base spirally striated. Jackson, Miss. Rare. The more common Turbonilla in Jackson is a form which I should rather put to Turbonilla neglecta Mr. than to the above ~ species. Compared with 7. major it is much smaller and more slender and the spiral striae are scarcely distinct, otherwise it is very similar. DENTITEREBRA 2. gen. Turreted ; transversely ribbed. Aperture narrow, terminating in a short anterior canal. Inner lip callous, very slightly striate. Outer lip crenulated internally, sinous posteriorly. Base striated. On account of its mouth this genus is probably to be placed among the Columbellidae, in which family it is conspicuous by its turreted spire and transverse ribs. It is perhaps to be considered a subgenus of Coluwmbella. If this is not the right position, it may belong to the Pleurotomidae. we 52 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. Dentiterebra prima n. sp. Pl. III fig. 2. The pointed nucleus consists of four volutions. Five adult whorls are covered by strong transverse ribs, eighteen on the body whorl; the surface else being smooth. Base with strong revolving lines, which are perceptible on the callus of the inner lip. The inner lip is else without striae or granulations. Crenulations of the outer lip six. Suture distinct, impressed. Claiborne, Ala. I found only the figured specimen. It has the appearance of a young Terebra. Pleurotoma Aldrichi n. sp. Pl. III fig. 7, 7a, 7b. The nucleus consists of one and a half smooth inflated embryonic whorls. Adult whorls six; they are convex, raised below the suture, covered by transverse ribs and elevated spiral lines. Of the spiral lines those on the middle of the whorl are the strongest. The sinus is above the middle of the whorl. Aperture less than one third of the shell, with rather straight canal. The young shell shows a simple outer lip and a smooth, but not callous inner lip. The older the shell the more deposit on the inner lip it has. Old specimens apparently have strong folds within the outer lip. Jackson, Miss. I found eight specimens. The specimens, 7 b, has longitudinal folds within the outer lips, the uppermost of which is the strongest; besides it is somewhat stouter than the others. I consider it, however, as an old specimen of the same species, for the surface, though partially skinned, shows the same ornamentation, the characteristic nucleus is the same, and one of the other specimens shows an indication of the upper fold within the outer lip. Tornatella volutata n. sp. Pl. III fig. 11. Oval-elongate. The nucleus consists of one and a half smooth volutions, the first volution standing almost vertical and being partly hidden. Five adult whorls are slightly convex and covered with impressed revolving lines. These lines are slightly punctuate; number about six on each whorl, the body whorl excepted, where they are numerous and towards the base increase in distinctness and become closer. Mouthrathernarrow. Outer lip sharp. Inner lip with a strong fold below the middle, and slightly covered by callus. Suture impressed. Vicksburg, Miss. “Higher Vicksburgian.” I found only the figured specimen. The species is considerably 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 53 cylindrical and approaches the subgenus Actaeonidea Gabb, from the Tertiary of the West Indies. It lacks, however, the anterior truncation of the collumella of Actaeonidea. Unicardium? eocenense n. sp. Pl. III fig. 14, 14 a. Small, tumid, solid. Margin subquadrangular, rounded anteriorly, truncate posteriorly. Beak turned anteriorly, before it a small cordate lunule. Lunular edge in front of the beak somewhat expanded. Below the beak one tubercular cardinal tooth (left valve), lateral teeth nearly obsolete. Anterior muscular impression elongated elliptical, posterior impression cordate-elliptical. Pallial impression notentire. Insiderough. Margin entire. Surface with indistinct concentric impressed lines, crossed by more distinct radiating lines. This ornamentation is wanting on the umboneal part and more distinct near the margin. The radiating lines are slightly more distinct on the posterior slope. - Red Bluff, Miss. The only found specimen, a left valve, shows three sinuations of the pallial line behind.—I have little doubt that this species belongs either to Unicardium d’Orbigny, or Fimbriella Stoliczka, or is to be placed in their neighbourhood. These two genera, however, are not known from the Tertiary formation, and if the Red Bluff form should prove to be a different and new genus I propose the name of Cordiula for it. MIKROLA 2. gen. Minute, subtrigonal, inaequilateral. Anterior side rounded, posterior side attenuated. Ligament in a trigonal pit below the beak. In the right valve this pit is lodged between two compressed cardinal teeth. Left valve without distinctly developed teeth. Muscular impressions oval? Pallial line sinuated behind. Surface concentrically ribbed. Margin entire. At first sight the genus has much resemblance to Spheniopsis, Sandberger, especially the left valve. But the dentition of the right valve is entirely different, and the genus may even not belong to the Myidae. I cannot discover any gaping of the valves. Mikrola mississippiensis n. sp. Pl. III fig. 16, 16a, 16b. Beaks almost obsolete. The concentric ribs of the surface end at the posterior terminal slope. Umbonial part smooth. Red Bluff, Miss. I found three double-valves of this species, which varies very much in the size and number of the concentric ribs. While one 54 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.. of the specimens shows only three large and distant concentric ribs,. another one is covered by about nine ribs. Turritella carinata H. C. Lea. Pl. III fig. 1, la. Turritella carinata H, C.Lea; Am. Journ. Science vol. XL, Jan. 1841. p 96, pl. 1 fig. ro. Fig. 1 represents the largest specimen which I have from Claiborne and fig. 1a is a specimen which shows two of the round embryonic whorls. The name of this species is not preoccupied by Turritella. carinata I. Lea, because this latter species is apparently identical with a form previously described. Eulima lugubris Lea. sp. Pl. III fig. 8. Pasithea lugubris Lea; 1. Lea. Contrib. to Geology 1833, p. ror, pl. 4, fig. 81. Eulima aciculata, Lea.sp. Pl. III. fig. 5. Pasithea aciculata Lea; I. Lea. Contrib. to Geology, 1833, p. 102, pl. 4, fig. 82. The specimen which I figure is from Jackson, Miss. It is. apparently identical with Lea’s Claiborne species. Pasithea guttula Lea. Pl. III fig. 6. Pasithea guttula Lea; 1. Lea. Contrib. to Geology 1833, p. 104, pl. 4, fig. 86. Cylichna Dekayi, Lea. sp. (var?) Pl. IIT fig.10. Bulla Dekayi Lea; 1. Lea. Contrib. to Geology, 1833, p, 200, pl. 6, fig. 215. The specimen which I figure, is from Jackson Miss. It is: perhaps to be considered a variety of the Claiborne species. Tornatina crassiplica Conr. sp. Pl. III fig. 9. Bulla crassiplica Conr. Journ. Ac. Philad. 1, 2nd Ser., Pl. 113, pl. 11, fig. 5. Ringicula mississippiensis Conr. Pl. III fig. 12. Ringicula mississippiensis Conr. Journ. Ac. Philad. I, 2nd Ser. p. 117; Pl. 18, fig. 36. Dentalium subcompressum Mr. PI. III fig. 13, 15a. D. subcompressum Mr.; Am. Journ. Sci. 1885, XXIX p. 462. D. subcompressum Mr,;. Bull, 1. Geol. Surv. Ala. 1886, p. 64, Pl. 3, fig. 3, 3a. Fig. 13 represents a specimen with complete posterior end, showing also in this respect the great similarity of this species to: Dentalium compressum Mr. from the German Oligocene. Tellina eburneopsis? Conr. Pl. III fig. 15a, 15b. ? Tellina eburneopsis Conr. Am. Journ. Conch, 1865, p. 138, Pl. 10, fig. 17. Conrad describes this species from the so-called locality “Entre- prise, Miss.” The specimen, which I figure,is from Jackson, Miss.. Fig. 15b gives the profile of the posterior side, showing the emargination at the posterior fold. 1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 55 NOTES. The following mistake is to be corrected. I described a specimen from Claiborne as “Crucibulum antiquum” (Bull. 1, Geol. Surv. Ala. 1886, p. 68 pl. 1 fig. 11). Having recently carefully cleaned the outside of this specimen it proved to be a Balanus with preserved operculum. In an article “Beitrag zur kenntniss des Alttertiaers von Mississippi und Alabama’* TI have given. (p. 16, 17) a list of Foraminifera of the eocene of Mississippi and Alabama, which I collected and which were determined by Mr. A. Woodward. The following species, also collected by me and determined by Mr. Woodward, have to be added to this list. Clavulina cylindrica Hantken; Matthews Landing, Ala.; Clai- borne, Ala.; Jackson, Miss.; Wautubbee, Miss. Cristellaria calear Linné sp.; Matthews Landing, Ala.; Jackson, Miss. Cristellaria cultrata Montfort sp,; Vicksburg, Miss. “Lower Vicksburgian.” Textularia agglutinans V’Orb.; Jackson, Miss. Polymorphina oblonga VOrb.; Jackson, Miss. Polymorphina problema VOrb.; Jackson, Miss. Miliolina agglutinans VOrb.; sp; Claiborne, Ala. Truncatulina lobatula Walker and Jacob sp.; Jackson, Miss. Truncatulina dutemplei VOrb.; Jackson, Miss. Pulvinulina canariensis? @Orb; Jackson, Miss. Nonionina depressula Walker and Jacob sp.; Wautubbee, Miss. EXPLANATION OF PLATE III. Fig. 1. Turritella carinata H. C. Lea, nat. size; Claiborne, Ala. Fig. 1a. . e “showing two embryonic whorls; Claiborne, Ala. Fig. 2. Dentiterebra prima n. gen. et n. sp; Claiborne, Ala. Fig. 3. Turbonilla major n. sp.; Jackson, Miss. Fig. 4. Odostomia Boettgeri n. sp.; Vicksburg, Miss. Fig. 5. Eulima aciculata Lea. sp.; Jackson, Miss. Fig. 6. Pasithea guttula Lea; Claiborne, Ala. Fig. 7. 7, 7a, 7b. Pleurotoma Aldrichi n. sp.; Jackson, Miss. Fig. 8. Eulima lugubris Lea; Claiborne, Ala. Fig. 9. Tornatina crassiplica Conr. sp.; Vicksburg, Miss. *Jahresber. d. Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft, Frankfurt a. M. 1886. 2 plates. 56 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. Fig. 10. Cylichna Dekayi Lea. sp. (var?) Jackson, Miss. Fig. 11. Tornatella volutata n. sp.; Vicksburg, Miss. Fig. 12. Ringicula mississippiensis Conr.; Vicksburg, Miss. “Lower Vicksburgian.” Fig. 13. Dentaliwm subcompressum Mr.; Vicksburg, Miss. Fig. 13a. The same specimen, view of posterior end. Fig. 14, 14a. Unicardium? eocenense n. sp.; Red Bluff, Miss. Fig. 15a, 15b. Tellina eburneopsis? Conr.; Jackson, Miss. Fig. 16, 16a,16a’. Mikrola mississippiensis n. gen. et. n. sp.; Red Bluff, Miss. Marcu 8. Mr. CHAarues Morris in the chair. Fifteen persons present. The deaths of Jos. Wilson M. D. and Bernard Persh, members, were announced. Marcu 15. Mr. Joun H. REDFIELD in the chair. Seventeen persons present. Papers under the following titles were presented for publication:— “A List of the Carices of Pennsylvania.” By Thomas C. Porter. “A Prodrome of a Memoir on Animal Locomotion.” By Harrison Allen M. D. On the First and Second Sets of Hair Germs Developed in the Skin of Fetal Cats——Prof. Ryder remarked that in a foetal Kitten, three and one-half inches in length, which he had examined, the germs of certain hair follicles in the skin were more prominent than the great majority of other hairgerms. These larger hair germs were especially obvious on the back and on the top of the head, where they formed very slight superficial elevations of the epidermis. Along the middle region of the back and head, these more prominent hair germs formed linear series or rows, which seemed to correspond somewhat in position to the arrangement of the stripes of color on the back of the adults, as seen in the Ocelot and the black and grey-striped variety of the domestic cat or grimalkin. On the sides and on the limbs the linear arrangement of these larger hair germs disappeared entirely, and they were distributed in an irregular manner, pretty 1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 57 uniformly amongst the smaller or less developed hair germs, which were everywhere far more numerous, being very probably the germs of the woolly coat or under-pelt. It is possible that these larger hair germs represent the rudiments of hairs, which are more particularly sensory in function, and which, like the vibrissee about the snout, and the groups of tactile hairs above the eyes, and the two groups on the cheeks of many mammals are more richly supplied with sensory nerves than others. The distribution of such tactile hairs in the Mammalia, was also consid- ered by the speaker, who referred to the studies of Eschricht, Stan- nius and his own, on the distribution of such tactile hairs on the snouts of the foetuses of various genera of Cetaceans, in which group it had been ascertained that they furnished very good characters diagnostic of species. It was also suggested in support of the view that larger hair germs on the body and head of the foetal cat, were sensory in function, since they seemed to be arranged in conformity with the color areas on the back, which, as had been pointed out by Prof. Harrison Allen, were the recipients of special branches of the superior twigs of the intercostal rami of the spinal nerves in certain animals, (Tamias.) Hairs with a special function have also been found in other regions in the skin of mammals; as for example, certain hairs described by Schobl on the interdigital wing mem- branes of bats. Upon reflection, however, the preceding view of the facts bearing upon the development of two kinds of hair germs in the skin of the foetal cat, were not wholly satisfactory. It was therefore deemed best to subject the skin of the foetus in question to still more search- ing scrutiny. A portion of the skin from the top of the cranium of the foetus was, therefore, carefully pealed off, stained in borax car- mine and cut into sections and mounted as a series. This series of sections revealed several very interesting points, which it was impos- sible to make out from a more superficial examination. It was found that the epidermis at this stage was only five or six layers of cells deep, and that there were two very sharply defined types of hair germs growing downwards from it into the corium. The larger and more advanced of these hair germs or follicles were: very much thicker and larger than the others, and had penetrated. more deeply into the underlying corium, than the less developed ones. At the point where the larger germs joined the epidermis, the latter was thickened so as to form the elevations marking the posi- 5 58 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. tions of the larger hair germs, when viewed from the surface. Further study also showed that the rudiment of a hair was well ad- vanced in the larger follicles, while in the smaller ones only the first traces of the hair bulb had been developed, without as yet having given rise to the beginning of a cornified hair shaft. In both kinds of follicles the rudiments of sebaceous glands had been developed from the sides of their necks, though a lumen or cavity had hardly as yet been developed within them. The rete mucosum consisted of of scarcely more than a single layer of rounded cells; of this layer the younger developing follicles are principally composed. These observations show that there are two distinct types of hair germs developed in the skin of the foetal cat, one of which is much more advanced in development, and far less numerous, at the same period, than the other. It has also been shown that the larger germs have a certain orderly linear arrangement in some regions, as, for instance, along the dorsal region. The questions which now present themselves in addition to the interpretation already suggested, relate to the nature of these different kinds of hair germs. It seemed to him not improbable, as surmised by Professor Leidy, that the larger germs may be those of the contour hairs, while the smaller ones represent the germs of the finer hairs of the under pelt or woolly coat. Yet this view does not dispose of the question raised by the fact of the orderly arrangement of the larger germs along the back; nor are they numerous enough to be the germs of the contour hairs. It maybe that this orderly arrangement relates to an ancestral condition, in which the hairs were fewer and while the ancestral mammalian type was still nearly cold-blooded. This view is supported by the fact that the temperature of the blood of the most reptilian of the mam- malia, viz., the Ornithodelphia, is considerably below that of ‘the Didelphia and Monodelphia, and that in at least one of these forms, Echidna, the spines, which represent hairs, are arranged in rows. In the other genus, Ornithorhynchus, the contour hairs are flat, the under-pelt of wool hairs being very densely set, while the contour hairs are not. Whether the quills or spines of Echidna are to be regarded as having descended by development from contour hairs is not known, but it is to be admitted that hairs of that type are most likely to have been developed into quills or spines, since they gener- ally project above the level of the woolly coat and have a much heavier shaft, which is always nearly straight and not crimped. Such an origin may, with much show of probability, be ascribed to the quills of the porcupine. 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 59 In anumber of mammalian orders, there is a marked tendency toward a dorsal, longitudinal striation, or linear alternation of bands or dots of color, and in a number of cases, this striation is well marked only in the young. This seems to be more than a mere co- incidence and probably indicates that in the primitive or ancestral Mammalia, such a pattern was widely prevalent, if not universal. On the sides, on the other hand, there is a tendency toward alterna- ting vertical colors with transverse bars on the limbs. This is a well-marked feature in the tiger, zebra and gnu. Later on it ap- pears that these bars have broken up into dots, giving rise to the dappled or the spotted appearance of such forms as the leopard, giraffe and horse. These features have a very important phylogen- etic significance, and point to an ancestral form, in which the color areas were disposed in bands. Looking about, amongst the lower groups, it is in Reptilia alone that we frequently find striping both longitudinal and transverse, and in that it is now admitted by some eminent authorities that the Mammalia are descended from the Reptilia (Theromorpha), some explanation is afforded of the preva- lent type of color marking in the young of many feral Mammalian forms which are not striped when mature. The dorsal longitudinal rows of hair germs in the skin of the foetal cat also afford confirmatory evidence. Their coincidence with the bands of color and precocious development, indicates that they are remnants of a more primitive hairy coat. Their linear arrange- ment makes it possible to compare them with the linear and longitu- dinal arrangement of the feathers in birds and of scales in reptiles. In that hairs of mammals, feathers of birds and the corneous scutes of reptiles, are closely related structures and developed from homol- ogous layers of the epidermis in these different classes, it is highly interesting to discover that the set of hair germs, which are the first to develop on the back of the foetal cat, also show the primordial, lin- ear arrangement of scales and feathers as observed on the backs of reptiles and birds. 60 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. A PRODROME OF A MEMOIR ON ANIMAL LOCOMOTION. BY HARRISON ALLEN, M. D., Emeritus Professor of Physiology in the University of Pennsylvania, The writer has undertaken at the request of the representatives of the University of Pennsylvania a series of studies on animal locomotion. The subject has been approached from the point of view presented by instantaneous photography, and has been espec- ially based on the results obtained by Mr. Eadweard Muybridge. The writer desires in this-connection to return his acknowledg- ments to Mr. Muybridge for opportunities in examining early impressions of the plates, which he is engaged in publishing under the auspices of the University, and also to state that he is indebted to Prof. Thomas Eakins for facilities afforded in studying the results of an experiment in the use of a modified form of Marey’s wheel, devised by him in photographing the action of the horse in motion. This short paper embraces the points which have been thought to have sufficient interest to appear in advance of the final memoir, and will include observations on the movements of the quadrupeds only. Many of the statements could have been deduced from data already accessible to the writer. But since he wrote the paper immediately after the inspection of the photographs his conclusions may be said to be based upon them. At the same time he has not hesitated to include materials not embraced by the photographs. Whenever practicable the study of a given series was carried on at the same time that the animal itself lay dissected before him. For example, when studying the photographs of the elephant he had the good fortune, through the courtesy of Prof. Huidekoper, to dissect the limbs of an elephant. He has also dis- sected! the horse, the ox, the raccoon, the sloth, the skunk, the Virginian deer and the domestic cat. THE USE OF TERMS. It is necessary to propose the use of a few terms which will clearly express in a word a meaning which otherwise would require the employment of a cumbersome phrase. The words flexion, extension 1JIn this connection the writer wishes to give especial acknowledgments to his friends Prof. Horace Jayne and Mr. Edwin A. Kelly. 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 61 abduction, adduction, pronation and supination imperfectly express many animal movements. Thus no adequate word exists for the movement of the hand upward and downward when the forearm is held in semipronation. Such a motion is of importance in describ- ing the wing of the bird and the bat. The term Planation is here thought to be convenient since it expresses the fact that the movement of the hand is in the plane of the flexor surface of the forearm. Planation includes both pronation and_ supination. Contraplanation as easily indicates a movement at an angle to the plane of the flexor surface of the forearm. It embraces flexion and extension and is not especially demanded, except that a term which includes both flexion extension as well as abduction, as used in the sense of abduction of the thumb, may be acceptable. In like manner it has been found useful to employ terms for the different orders of the foot-falls. Synchiry indicates that the right and left foot of a single pair act together. Thus in the gallop the horse moves all the feet synchirally. The movement of the lower limbs in man is also synchiral. The feet may act alternately or together. Asynchiry would naturally embrace the movements in which the feet act in combinations of hind and forefeet. But since these movements are varied and important, it has been thought desirable to substitute a positive term, and the word heterochiry * is pro- posed. The walk, the trot and the rack are heterochiral, since the fore foot is followed, not by its fellow, but by a hind foot. When the hind foot alternates with the fore foot of the same side lateral heterochiry occurs. When with the fore foot of one side the hind foot of the opposite side alternates, diagonal heterochiry takes place. In connection with the terms flexion and extension the following will be used:— The movement of a limb against the medium in which the animal is moving constitutes the “stroke.” The movement in preparation of the stroke constitutes the “recover.” In the description of the “hand over hand” movements of the sloth and the monkey, the word “ flexion” has no place; yet the “recover ” is used in as exact a sense as in the movements of any other animal. 1 While assuming the responsibility for this word the writer desire at the same time to say that it was suggested to him in a conversation with his friend Prof: iN: Gill? 62 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. When a limb of a terrestrial quadruped rests upon the ground it may be said be “on,” and when not on the ground, to be “ off.” The term “sura” will be employed as a convenient word to include the hind limb from the knee to the ankle. “ Crus” has been retained so generally as a synonym for the entire posterior extremity - as not to be available. “Stroke” is the period of impact. It is included in flexion, and constitutes its first stage. ‘ Recover” embraces the last stage of flexion and the whole of the period of foreward movement. The terms “stroke” and “ recover” are by no means the same as flexion and extension. ‘They simply express certain phases of limb-function which are seen during the acts of backward and foreward movements. THE POSITION OF LIMBS. In studying the motions of the limb of a vertebrate the position which answers to that taken by the salamander, when at rest, is assumed to be the best adapted for comparison. In this position the limb is horizontal to the plane of the longitudinal axis of the body. The venter of the body and the ventral surface of the limb are on the same plane nearly. The limb of a reptile varies scarcely at all from that just named. When a terrestrial animal is erect the limb instead of being on the same plane with that of the body is moved a quarter of a circle downward. In the bird the posterior extremity when at rest is in the same position as the terrestrial, but the ante- rior extremity, in marked contrast to it, is flexed. When extended the extremity is thrown upward to a position as far removed from the horizontal position of the salamander in one direction as is that of the terrestrial quadruped in the other. In the movement of all limbs the directions in the main are for- ward and backward. Both the movements are oblique but between them is a position which is straight. In the terrestrial animal this position may be said to answer to a line in the anterior extremity which lies immediately in advance of the withers and in the posterior extremity to the centre of the acetabulum. THE MOVEMENTS OF LIMBS. If a limb can be conceived moving in vacuo it can be at once understood that propulsion is impossible. For propulsion can follow only upon the initiation of an impetus and this in turn only by the resistance of the limb against the medium in which the animal 1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 63 is moving, or in the case of the terrestrial animal, the surface of the ground. The resistance of the air and the water are so much less than that of the earth that the acts of flying and of swimming become radically different from those of walking, of running, or of any allied movement. In flying and swimming the resistance made by the limb against the medium in effecting an impetus does not arrest the movement of the pinion or the foot; whereas in terrestrial movements the instant that the foot strikes the earth the resistance is great and the arrest is complete. In the swimming turtle the first stage of the recover drives the foot in spite of the resistance of the water to the point at which the second stage begins. With some slight modifications the same is true of fossorial animals. Thus in flying, in swimming, and in burrowing the limb describes a continuous movement which unites the path of the stroke to that of the recover. In the animal moving on the surface of the ground, the foot being brought to rest, an absolute break occurs between the beginning of the act of recover and its completion,—the time which would be required to describe the interval and thus to complete the union corresponds to the period that the foot is on the ground. This period constitutes the stroke. The limb rests on the ground until the trunk moves beyond the point at which it can maintain itself. It is lifted at intervals which are dependent upon the momentum of the moving mass. One, two, or three limbs may be on the ground at the same time. The rates at which the succession of the foot-falls occur, in their turn, depend not only upon the rate of speed at which the animal is moving, but on the gait as well. KINDS OF WORK DONE BY THE LIMBS. The kinds of work done by the limbs are two in number, viz., that done by the fore limbs and that done by the hind limbs. The hind limbs are more powerful than the fore limbs, and in some animals, as the kangaroo and the jumping mouse, are the main effectives. No terrestrial animal depends for support upon the fore limbs. When all the limbs are equal or nearly equal in length, the prepon- derance is still in favor of the hind limbs owing to the fact that the great backward movement of these limbs on the trunk is made possible by the fixation of the bones to the pelvis and through this structure tothe vertebral column. Not only is this the case but the hind limbs alone possess the power of propelling the body so as to throw upon the 64 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. fore limbs the labor of aceommodatiug themselves to the rate of work of their more powerful associates. When an animal is moving at a high rate of speed, as in the gallop, the synchiral action of the hind limbs projects the body with such force as to compel the fore limbs to act simply as props which successively carry the body forwards until one of the hind limbs is again in position to give the body a second impetus. In proof of this assertion it is only necessary to observe that the greatest height attained by the trunk is that secured by the rump when both hind feet are off the ground. The statement gener- ally made that the horse leaves the ground by one of the fore feet creates the impression that he gains the springing force from this foot, all the previous movements being in preparation for such a spring. In place of this statement another is here substituted, viz., that the horse springs from that hind foot which last leaves the ground and is “off” from all feet when he simply relinquishes the support afforded by the last prop, that is to say the last fore foot. If the fore and hind limbs were based on the same plan the motion of an animal would be either a series of springs—the two feet push- ing against the ground at the same moment—or a series of steps, the two feet moving alternately. While closely resembling one another the two limbs are not on the same plan. If any motion takes place in the vertebral column at the time that the fore limb is moving it is noticed that it occurs in the region of the neck. The scapula has a slight motion downward and backward. The motion in the hind limbs occur in the region of the lumbar vertebree while the pelvic bones are fixed. The limit of the forward motion of the hind limbs is dependent upon the flexibility of the lumbar vertebree. The limit of the similar motion of the fore limb is determined by the action of the muscles alone. The forward motion of the fore limbs is essentially the same in all animals; but the forward movement of the hind limbs is variable, because the lumbar vertebree differ in degrees of flexibility. In unguiculates there is more lumbar flexibility than in ungulates. In backward movements the opposite obtains, for in these positions the fore limbs can be carried back toavariable distance. Inthe deer and its congeners the fore foot can be brought to a point near the centre of the body, and the limb be vertical. In the horse the fore limb in backward strain is very oblique and the foot while well placed under the trunk cannot reach the centre. In the macaque the fore foot cannot pass beyond a vertical line which intersects the trunk a little back of the shoulder- joint. The backward movement of the hind limb is nearly the 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 65 same inall animals. The leg is always carried in a direct path, the limit of the movement being determined solely by the length of the limb. In a word the forward movement is the less constrained in the fore limb while the backward movement is the least constrained in the hind limb. The most variable movements are the backward for the fore-limb and the forward for the hind-limb. The foot in all animals excepting the horse (and even in this single toed form the movement of the foot is nearly all essentials the same) is carried forward in semipronation. The foot strikes the ground on the outer border. Pronation now begins and is completed by the time the perpendicular line is reached. The foot leaves the ground by the inner border (the toes being successively abducted) so that the pressure of the body is borne from without inward across the foot. The foot is always everted as it leaves the ground. In a plantigrade animal, as the raccoon, the foot is carried during the last part of recover nearly parallel to the plane of support. In the rapid motion of ungulates the foot may actually touch the ground nearly to the hock. In backward strain the hock or heel is gradually raised and at the end of strain the animal is seen touching the ground by the tip of the inner functionally active toe. In the horse the foot leaves by the tip of the hoof. It is likely that the degree of impact of the outer border of the foot will be found to correlate with the degree of development of the calcaneo-sural joint* since the weight must be carried along the outer border to the rest of the limb. At the end of backward strain the limb from the knee distally is in the same line. The moment flexion begins eversion is established, and the limb becomes angulated outward at the ankle. The main axis of the proximal facet of the astragalus is correlative with the degree of this obliquity. It is most pronounced in the horse, less so in the ox, and scarcely at all in the hog. It has been already seen that when the limb is in the position of arrest and the momentum carries the body beyond the perpendicular line it is thrown into “backward strain.” The instant that the strain begins the knee is seen to move outward and the hock to move inward, The parts of the foot below the heel remain unchanged. The impact of the structures of the limb are thus impaired in backward strain. It is well known that in the pentadacyle forms the foot can be readily rotated at the medio-tarsal joint and it is a reasonable *A name proposed for the joint existing Letween the fibular process of the calcaneum and the fibula or the tibia. 66 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. assumption that it is at this joint that the distal part of the limb moves when the entire limb rotates outward. The femur, the bones of the leg, and the astragalus act as one factor; and the caleaneum and the remaining bones of the foot as the other factor. The socket for the proximal motion occurs at the hip, and that for the distal at the concavity of the scaphoid bone. There is also considerable motion between the calcaneum and the cuboid bone and between the cal- caneum and the lower end of the fibula, if this bone is present, or with the outer end of the tibia if it is absent. Outward rotation of the main portion of the limb carries the caleaneum slightly inward by reason of the articulation between the calcaneum and the bones of the leg, Facets are here present in most terrestrial mammals. In the wombat the articulation is evident. It is present in a rudimentary form in man, The outer surface of the caleaneum of the bear is marked by a stout roughened ridge as it enters into articulation with the fibula. In the dog the surface is a small embossment which probably is in contact with the fibula only at the time of the backward strain. In a single old dog examined the same ridge is present as in the bear. A similar ridge which developed under the stimulus of diseased action is seen in the skeleton of the tiger in the Museum of the Academy. As the knee is rotated outward the outer border of the foot is slightly inverted. This disposition is opposed by the peroneus longus muscle which everts the foot. Coincident with the inversion the external crucial ligament becomes tense and the tendency to torsion is checked. The first movement noticed in the limb after it is beyond the centre of gravity is the flexion of the foot. In the horse the hoof is thrown backward and the under surface of the foot is directed back- ward, the heel being raised first. The sole is next directed upward. In animals possessing more than one functionally active toe the toes are quickly adducted in the air so as to offer the least resistance to the impetus of the entire body. Associated with the above a pronounced flexion of all parts of the limb occurs excepting at the hip, where the movement is slight. A movement of the thigh toward the trunk is indeed discernible. In animals possessing long thigh-bones, such as the elephant, the movement is more decided than in the ungulates. The same remarks are applicable to the move- ments of the humerus. The degree to which flexion is carried is more marked in the young than in the adult, and in terrestrial than 1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 67 in arboreal creatures. In the sloth (Cholepus) flexion is absent, the limbs being advanced by a swinging motion at the shoulder and the hip. The unaided eye receives the impression of backward movement but fails to be impressed with forward movement. It may hence be inferred that the former is a quicker movement than the latter. In the fore limb the last state of extension of the forearm answers to the action of the extensors of the carpus and of the digits. In the less delicate movements of the hind limb the muscles which extend the tarsus and the toes move the foot with less precision and it is likely with less speed. Biological Department of the University of Pennsylvania, March Ist, 1887. 68 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. Marc#H 22. The President, Dr. Lerpy, in the chair. Twenty-four persons present. The following were ordered to be printed :— A LIST OF THE CARICES OF PENNSYLVANIA. By Tuos. C. Porter. All the species of Carex contained in this list are represented in the herbarium of Lafayette College by specimens from all the coun- ties named, with the single exception of C. Torreyi. It will be observed, that, contrary to the common usage, the county is put first, the particular station next, and then, the name of the collector, in italics. When the latter is wanting, it indicates that the author himself is the collector. The order of arrangement and most of the changes in nomencla- ture are taken from the Synopsis of North American Carices, by L. H. Bailey, Jr., published in the Proceedings of the American Acad- emy of Arts and Sciences, 1886. 1, Carex paucifiora, Lightf. SusquEHANNA, near Montrose, Garber, 1869; WaAyne, Torrey Lake, Garber, 1870. Very rare. The southern limit of the species. 2. Carex subulata, Michx. ScHuyLKILL, Broad Mountain, in a bog beside the railroad, in company with the very rare and local Juncus Smithii, Engelm., 1866. According to Darlington’s Flora Cestrica, it has also been found in Chester County. 3. Carex folliculata , iE. Monrokr, Pocono; LAckAwANNA, Moosic Lake ; Luzerne, Car- bondale, Garber ; ScHuyLKILL; NorTHAMPTON, Pen Argyl; DEL- AWARE, Tinicum; LANCASTER, Smithville Swamp; CrenTRE, Bear Meadows; VENANGO, East Sandy Creek, Garber. Common in the mountains, but rare elsewhere. 4, Carex intumescens, Rudge. Monrok, Water Gap, Knipe; NortHAmpton; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); CHEsTER, (Fl. Cestr.); Lancaster; Buatr, Boecking ; ARmMstTRONG, Knipe. 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 69 5. Carex Grayii, Carey. CLEARFIELD, McMinn, 1867; Mercer, Garber, 1868. DeELA- WARE, Tinicum, A. H. Smith, 1867. Very rareeast of the Alleghenies. 6. Carex lurida, Wahl. (C. lwpulina, Muhl.). Monrok, Water Gap, Knipe; NorrHampton; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); DeLaware, Dr. George Smith; Curster, (FI. Cestr.) ; LANCASTER; FRANKLIN; HUNTINGDON. 7.Carexlurida, Wahl., var. polystachya, Bailey. CLEARFIELD, McMinn; CrAwrorp, Conneaut Lake, Garber. Rare. Not known east of the Alleghenies. 8. Carex oligosperma, Michx. CENTRE, in a bog four miles west of Pennsylvania Furnace ; CargBon, borders of Round Pond, Aug., 1867. Very rare. The southern limit of the species. 9, Carex rostrata, Withering. Monror, Tobyhanna Mills and Tunkhannock Creek; ERrIs, Presque Isle, Garber. 10. Carex rostrata, Withering, var. utriculata, Bailey. Monroe, Dr. Traill Green, Moyer; Sutiivan, C. E. Smith; TroGca, Garber; CENTRE, Bear Meadows; Exx, McMinn. 11. Carex monile, Tuckerman. Bucks, Sellersville, Fretz ; CHEster, (FI. Cestr.); Hunrinepon, Barrens, Lowrie; Erx, McMinn; CrAwrorp, Garber; MERCER, Middlesex, Garber. 12. Carex Tuckermani, Boott. Mowrok, Pocono; Huntinecpon ; CLEARFIELD, McMinn; MEr- cER, Garber. Rare. 18. Carex bullata, Schkuhr. LANcAsTeER, Smithville Swamp; Lycomine, Limekiln Swamp, McMinn. Rare and local. 14, Carex retrorsa, Schweinitz. Huntinepon, near Pennsylvania Furnace, Boecking, 1870. The only station known in the State. The southern limit of the species. 15. Carex tentaculata, Muhl. MonroE; Norraampron; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); CHESTER, (Fl. Cestr.); Lancaster; CenTRE; Barr, Boecking; CLEAR- FIELD, McMinn; Cuarion, Garber. Common and abundant. 16. Carex tentaculata, Muhl., var. gracilis, Boott. Wayne, Garber; Monroe; Huntrncpon; CLEARFIELD, McMinn. 70 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. 17. Carex Schweinitzii, Dewey. Monrok, Pocono, Schweinitz. The specimen is from Schweinitz himself, but it does not seem to have been collected in Pennsylvania since his day. 18, Carex hystricina, Muhl. Monrog, Water Gap, Knipe; NorrHampton, Easton; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); CursTer, (Fl. Cestr.); Lancaster; FRANKLIN; HUNTINGDON. 19. Carex Pseudo-Cyperus, L. Erte, Presque Isle, Garber. 20. Carex Pseudo-Cyperus, L, var. comosa, W. Boott. Wayne, Garber; Pixe, Fiot; NorTHAMpPTON, near Easton; Bucks, Diffenbaugh, (Moyer’s Cat,); LANcAstER; HuNTINGDON, Alexandria; CRAWFORD, Conneaut Lake, Garber; ER1E, Presque Isle, Garber. 21. Carex stenolepis, Torrey. Huntinepon, near Alexandria; GREENE, Greensboro, Garber. Very rare and local. 23. Carex squarrosa, L. Bucks, Diffenbaugh; PHitapELPHtIA, Diffenbaugh ; DELAWARE, Dr. G. Smith; CHester, (FI. Cestr.), LANcAstTER; HUNTINGDON; CLEARFIELD, McMinn; Mercer, Garber; ALLEGHENY, Knipe. 23. Carex Shortiana, Dewey. FRANKLIN, in meadows around Mercersburg. The only station known in the State. Its northern and eastern limit. 24. Carex scabrata, Schweinitz. Wayne, Garber; Carson; NorrHampron; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); Philadelphia, on the Wissahickon, C. E. Smith and Dr, Jos. Leidy; LANCASTER; FRANKLIN; SULLIVAN, C. E. Smith; Buatr, Lowrie. Along shaded rivulets, especially in the mountains. Not common. 25. Carex vestita, Willd. NorrHamprton, Pen Argyl; Bucks, Bristol, Diffenbaugh, (Moyer’s Cat.); Lancasrer, Smithville Swamp; CLEARFIELD, Me Minn ; Cameron, McMinn. Rare. 26. Carex filiformis, L. Wayne, Garber; Monror, Water Gap, Knipe; Erte, Presque Isle, Garber, Guttenburg. Rare. 27. Carex filiformis, L., var. latifolia, Boeckeler,( C. lanuginosa, Michx.) Monroe, Water Gap, Knipe; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); CHESTER, (Fl. Cestr.); Berks; Lancaster; FRANKLIN; ELK, McMinn. 1887. NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 71 28. Carex trichocarpa, Muhl. Monror, Water Gap, Knipe; Bucxs, (Moyer’s Cat.); LANncas- TER; FRANKLIN; CENTRE, Boecking; ELK, MeMinn. 29, Carex riparia, W. Curtis. (C. lacustris, Willd.) Wayne, Garber; Bucks, Garber ; DeLAWARE, Tinicum, A. H. Smith ; Tioca, Garber; ELK, McMinn. Rare. 30. Carex Buxbaumii, Wahl. Lenicu, near Mountainville; Bucks; LANcAsTER; FRANKLIN. Rare. 31. Carex vulgaris, Fries. Monror, Water Gap, Knipe; Centre, McMinn. Very rare. Its southern limit. 32. Carex aquatilis, Wahl. Erre, Presque Isle, Guttenberg. 33. Carex stricta, Lamarck. Wayne, Garber;. MonroE; NorTHAMPTON; CHESTER, (FI. Cestr.); Berks, Garber; LANCASTER; FRANKLIN; ELK, McMinn. Very common and variable; growing in marshy places in tussocks, 34. Carex aperta, Boott. Bucks, Moyer, Fretz; Lycomine, A. H. Smith, McMinn. Rare. 35. Carex torta, Boott. NortTHAMPTON, Fiot; Bucks, Nockamixon Rocks; CHESTER, Can- by; FRANKLIN; Perry, Garber; SvuLiivan, on the Loyalsock, C. E. Smith; Huntrnepon; Briarr, Burgoon’s Gap; CLEARFIELD, Sandy Lick, McMinn; Ex, McMinn. Along the margins and often in the beds of rivulets, in shaded, rocky ravines. Sometimes the fertile spikes are much crowded and much branched (var. com- posita, Porter), giving the plant a singular appearance, as if, to use the phrase of Mr. Canby, it had “run mad.” 36. Carex prasina, Wahl. (C. miliacea, Muhl.) Norruampton; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); PaHrLApDELPHtIA, Dr. J. Leidy; Cuester, (Fl. Cestr.); Berks, Dr. J. P. Hiester; Lan- CASTER; SULLIVAN, A, H. Smith; Ex, McMinn. 37. Carex crinita, Lamarck. Monroe; Norraamptron; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); CHESTER, (FI. Cestr.); Lancaster; Eux, McMinn. 38. Carex crinita, Lam., var. gynandra, Schw. and Torr. WAYNE, Garber; LACKAWANNA; LuzERNE, Garber; Monrog, Pocono; ScHUYLKILL; NORTHAMPTON, Seidersville, R. G. Bechdolt; CHESTER, Landenberg, Canby; Tioga, Garber; CLEARFIELD, 72 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. McMinn; Armstrone, Garber—Common in the mountains, but rare elsewhere. 39. Carex Magellanica, Lamarck. (C. irrigua, Smith.) Monrog, on the Tunkhannock, Dr. Traill Green, June, 1861. Very rare. Its southern limit. Since found (in 1886) in the same neighborhood, by Prof. Dudley, who writes, “The unusually obtuse perigynia more resemble those of the Fuegian specimens figured by Boott than those of any other specimens or figures I have access to.” 40. Carex limosa, L. Wayne, Garber; Mownror, Pocono; Troca, Garber; Bucks, Sellersville, Moyer.—Rare. Chiefly in sphagnous bogs on the mountain—plateaus. 41. Carex virescens, Muhl. Monrog, Knipe; NoRTHAMPTON, around Easton; Bucks, Fretz; PHILADELPHIA, Diffenbaugh; De tAwarn, A. H. Smith; Monrt- GoMERY, Dijfenbaugh ; LANCASTER; FRANKLIN.—Common. 42. Carex triceps, Michx. . NortrHaMpron; Bucks; PHILADELPHIA; DELAWARE, Tinicum; A. H. Smith; CuHerster, (Fl. Cestr.); Lancaster; FRANKLIN ; Lycomine, A. H. Smith; Tioga, Garber; Buatr, Boecking. A common and variable species. 43. Carex Smithii, Porter. (Olney, Evsice., fase. 1, no. 28.) Glabrous, except the sheaths of the narrowly-linear leaves; culms slender, erect, 1 to 2 feet high; fertile spikes 2 to 4, short-cylin- drical, nearly sessile, approximate; perigynia globular, contracted to a manifest point, crowded but not imbricated, smooth, a little longer than the ovate, brownish, mucronate scales; akenes broadly- pyriform, with very short, abrupt, inflexed tips—-CHEsTER; DeELa- WARE, Tinicum and Pusey’s Woods, A. H. Smith. In shape and appearance, the spikes, perigynia and akenes, and the olive-green hue of the plant, at first sight, suggest C. granuwlaris rather than C. triceps——It is named in honor of Mr. Aubrey H. Smith of Philadelphia. Just beyond our borders, Mr. Canby re- ports it as “very common in fields and woodlands around Wilming- ton, Delaware,” and specimens from Gloucester, N. J. were sent me by the late Chas. F. Parker. It is certainly a well-marked variety, if not a distinct species. 44, Carex longirostris, Torrey, Lycomrna, near Williamsport, McMinn; Monron, Water Gap, Knipe; Bucks, Nockamixon Rocks, Garber. Rare and local. Its southern limit. 1887. | NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 13 45. Carex arctata, Boott. Monrog, Pocono, Dr. Traill Green; Sututvan, Chas. E. Smith; Buarr, Boecking ; Exx, McMinn.—Rare. Its southern limit. 46. Carex debilis, Michx. Monror, Pocono; NorrHameron; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.) ; DeLawaRE, A. H. Smith; Cuester, (FI. Cestr.); LANCASTER, Smithville Swamp; Crenrre, Bear Meadows, Lowrie; Huntrnc- pon; Buair, Boecking; CLEARFIELD, McMinn; Mercer, Garber. 47. Carex debilis, Michx., var. pubera, Gray. CENTRE, Bear Meadows, Lowrie; LANCASTER, Smithville Swamp. Very rare and local. 48. Carex aestivalis, M. A. Curtis. CuHester. (FI. Cestr.); Lackawanna, Carbondale, Garber ; Suutuivan, ©. E. Smith; Tioga, Garber.—Rare. 49. Carex gracillima, Schweinitz. LeuicH, Garber; NorrHampton; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); CuesTer, (FI. Cestr.); Lancaster; FRANKLIN; BuAtr, Boecking. Common. 50. Carex Davisii, Schw. «& Torr. NorruamptTon; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); Curstrr, (Fl. Cestr.) 5 LANCASTER ; FRANKLIN, Mercersburg.—Rare. 51. Carex grisea, Wahl. Mownror, Water Gap, Knipe; NorrHampron, Easton; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); Cursrer, (FI. Cestr.); LANcAsTER; FRANKLIN , Buarr; AtiEecHEeNy, Knipe-—Common. 52. Carex glaucodea, Tuckerman. NortHampron, Easton, Pen Argyl, Bethlehem, Fiot; Bucks, Nockamixon Rocks, marshes near Quakertown ; DELAWARE, Pusey’s Woods, A. H. Smith; Lancaster; Lycomrne, MceMinn.—I first met with this species in a swamp near Smithville, Lancaster County, in 1863. It struck me at once as new, and specimens, name and distinctive characters were sent to Col. Olney, who informed me that it had also been discovered near Amherst, Mass., and that Prof. Tuckerman had just described it and his description would soon appear in the Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Since then, it has been found at a number of stations. in Eastern Pennsylvania and the neighboring States. In 1880, I collected it on the summit of Roane Mtn., N. C. 53. Carex granularis, Muhl. NortHAmpPtTon; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); CHEsrer, (Fl. Cestr.); 6 74 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. LANCASTER; FRANKLIN, Mercersburg —Common. 54. Carex granularis, Muhl., var. Haleana, ( C. Haleana, Olney. Exsiccat. fase. ili, no. 14.) Glabrous ; leaves broad and very glaucous; culms and peduncles slender and weak ; fertile spikes much smaller and shorter; perigy- nia less than half the usual size, rather narrowly ovoid, not globular. NorrTHAMPTON, near Easton; LANCASTER, Smithville Swamp ; ALLEGHENY, Knipe.——Outside of our limits, it has been collected at Madison, Wisc., by 7. J. Hale, and in Montgomery County, Va., by Dr. Joseph Leidy. 55. Carex flava, IG. CRAWFORD, Conneaut Lake, Garber.—The only station known. 56. Carex Gderi, Retz. Erig, Presque Isle, Garber.—The only station known. 57, Carex pallescens, L. Wayne, Garber ; LACKAWANNA, Carbondale, Garber ; CLrNToN, MeMinn.—Rare. The southern limit of the species. 58. Carex Torreyi, Tuckerman. Specimens of this rare species are reported as existing in European herbaria, collected by Schweinitz near Bethlehem, Penna., and named by him C. abbreviata. This may be correct, but among his plants, now in possession of the Philadelphia Academy, there is a sheet, at the top of which he has written “Carex lanosa—abbreviata,” and at the bottom, “Bethlehem.” The eight or ten specimens on the sheet, fastened down with paper-strips, are all C. vestita, Willd. Although sought for in his old haunts, C. Torreyi has not yet been rediscovered. 59. Carex conoidea, Schkuhr. Monror, Water Gap, Knipe; NortHampvron ; Bucks; DELA- WARE, Canby; Brrxs, near Reading; LANCASTER; FRANKLIN; Lycomine, McMinn. 60. Carex oligocarpa, Schkuhr. Nortruampton, Easton; Bucks, Sellersville, Fretz; LANCASTER, on the Conestoga.—Rare. The specimens of Dr. Fretz exactly agree with those of Dr. Sart- well from Penn Yan, W. N. York, and I cannot see in them any likeness to the southern narrow-leayed variety of C. grisea, to which they have been referred. 61. Carex Hitchcockiana, Dewey. NorrHampron, Easton; Lancaster; ALLEGHENY, Knipe. Rare. 1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA, 75 62 Carex laxiflora, Lamarck. Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); Lancaster; Buatr, Lowrie. 63. Carex laxiflora, Lam., var’. stylofiexa, Boott. Leuicu, Garber; NorrHampron, Bethlehem; Bucks, Garber ; Berks, Neversink Mtn.; DrELAwarg, Tinicum, A. H. Smith—Rare. 64. Carex laxiflora, Lam., var. patulifolia, Carey. Monrog, Water Gap, Knipe; NorruamMpPrTon ; LANCASTER ; Huntinapon ; ALLEGHENY, Knipe. 65. Carex laxiflora, Lam., va. intermedia, Boott. NortHampton; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); FRANKLIN, LUZERNE, Garber; Lycomrine, McMinn; Mercer, Garber. 66. Carex laxiflora, Lam., var. striatula, Carey. NortHampron; Bucks, (Moyer’sCat.); DELAWARE, Diffenbaugh; LANCASTER. 67. Carex laxiflora, Lam., var. latifolia, Boott. Bucks, Nockamixon Rocks; LANCAsTER; ALIEGHENY, Garber. 68. Carex retrocurva, Dewey. NortHampron; Bucks, Moyer; LANCASTER; FRANKLIN; CEN- TRE, Boecking—Rare. 69. Carex digitalis, Willd. NortHampton; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); DreLAwareg, Dr. G. Smith; Cuester, (Fl. Cestr.); Lancaster; Troca, Garber; CLEARFIELD and Ex, McMinn. 70. Carex platyphylla, Carey. Monror, Water Gap, Knipe; Bucxs, Nockamixon Rocks; CuestTerR, Black Rock Tunnel, Diffenbaugh ; LANCASTER; SULLI- LivAN, C. E. Smith; Crmnrre, Boecking; ALLEGHENY, Knipe. Rare. The C. platyphylla of Darlington’s Flora Cestrica is probably C. laxiflora, Lam. 71. Carex Careyana, Torrey. ALLEGHENY, Knipe.—F rom one station only. 72. Carex plantaginea, Lamarck. Bucks, Nockamixon Rocks; CHrsrrer, near Pheenixville, Mar- tindale ; SULLIVAN, on the Loyalsock, C. E. Smith ; Buatr, Lowrie; CLEARFIELD, McMinn; ALLEeGuENy, Knipe—Rare and local. 73. Carex polymorpha, Muhl. Mownroer, Pocono; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); LANcAsTER, Smith- ville Swamp; Cuinron, MeMinn.—Rare and local. 74, Carex tetanica, Schkuhr. Monror, Water Gap, Knipe; NortHampron, Easton; Bucks, 76 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [ 1887. (Moyer’s Cat.); LancAstER; FRANKLIN. 75. Carex tetanica, Schkuhr, var. Canbyi. (C. panicea, L., var. Canbyi, Olney, Exsice. fase. ii, nos. 24 and 25.) Taller, erect and more robust than the type. The fertile spikes and perigynia larger. In the last edition of Gray’s Manual, it is placed under C. panicea, 1., but Mr Bailey makes it identical with C. Meadii, Dew., from which it differs in its blunt scales and habit of growth. "6. Carex tetanica, Schkuhr, var. Carteri. Lancaster, New Texas, J. J. Carter, June, 1862.—Glabrous, 15 to 20 inches high; staminate spikes on shorter stalks; pistillate spikes 2 to 3, oblong, erect, all staminate at the apex; lower bract equalling the culm; perigynia ovoid, obtuse, straight or straightly curved above, not pointed, twice the length of the blunt scales.— Named for the discoverer. 77. Carex Meadii, Dewey. Bucks, Dr. I. S. Moyer—vVery rare. It exactly accords with Western specimens received from Dr. Mead and Mr. Bebb. 78. Carex Crawei, Dewey. Cuinton, McMinn.—The only station known. 79. Carex aurea, Nutt., var. androgyna, Olney. Erie, Presque Isle, Garber.—The only station known. 80. Carex eburnea, Boott. NorrHamprTon, near Easton.—On shaded limestone rocks; in dense mats, and abundant. The only station known. 81. Carex pedunculata, Muhl. Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); Berxs, Dr. J. P. Hiester ; LANCASTER; FRANKLIN; SuLiivan, C. E. Smith; Jerrerson, McMinn; Erte, Presque Isle, Guttenberg.—Rare. 82. Carex Pennsylvanica, Lamarck. Norruampron; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); Curster, (FI. Cestr.) ; LANCASTER; CLEARFIELD, Sandy Ridge, MeMinn.—Far less com- mon than the next species.—In the specimens of Mr. Mc Minn, the leaves are from 2} to 3 lines wide, and the scales and perigynia deep chestnut-brown. 83. Carex varia, Muhl. MonroeE; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); Berks, Difenbaugh; ScHuy.- KILL; LANCASTER; FRANKLIN; SULLIVAN, C. E. Smith; Bate, Lowrie; CLEarRrretp, McMinn. 84, Carex Emmonsii, Dewey. Norrnampron ; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); PHtLADELPHIA; LAN- 1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 77 CASTER; ALLEGHENY, Knipe. $5, Carex nigro-marginata, Schweinitz. NorrHamprton, Seidersville, R. G. Bechdolt: Bucks, J. A. and H. F. Ruth—Rare and local. 86. Carex umbellata, Schkuhr. NorruHampron; Bucks; Carson, Garber; Lycomine, A. H. Smith; PataApELpHIA, Manayunk, C. E. Smith; Lancaster, Chickies——On dry rocks and hillsides. Not common. 87. Carex pubescens, Muhl. Norruampton; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); DrLaware, Dr. G. Smith ; CHESTER, (FI. Cestr.); Berks, Dr. J. P.Hiester ; LANCASTER; CLEARFIELD and EK, McMinn. 88. Carex Willdenovii, Schkuhr. NortHampton; Bucks, Nockamixon Rocks; LANcAstTER; Ly- cominG, A. H. Smith—Rare. 89. Carex Steudelii, Kunth. LANCASTER, on the Conestoga; DAupury, near Harrisburg, Garber; ALLEGHENY, Knipe.—Rare. 90. Carex polytrichoides, Muhl. Monror, Water Gap, Knipe; NorrHampron; Cuester, (Fl. Cestr.); LANCASTER; FRANKLIN; SULLIVAN, C. E. Smith; Hunt- INGDON.—Common, in wet meadows. 91. Carex chordorhiza, Ehrhart. TioGa, Marsh Farm, near Wellsborough, Garber, 1869.—Very rare. The only station known. Its southern limit. 92. Carex conjuncta, Boott. PHILADELPHIA, on the Schuylkill, Canby.—No other station known. 98. Carex stipata, Muhl. Wayne, Garber ; NorrHampron ; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); PHtt- ADELPHIA, Diffenbaugh; CHEsTER, (Fl. Cestr.); LANCASTER; Suxuivan, C. E. Smith; Centre, Boecking; Huntincpon; ALLE- GHENY, Knipe.—One of our most common and abundant species. 94. Carex teretiuscula, Gooden. Tioca and CrawFrorpb, Garber.—Rare. 95. Carex teretiuscula, Gooden., var. ramosa, Boott. Lancaster, Dillerville Swamp; Centre, Boecking—Rare. 96. Carex vulpinoidea, Michx. NortTHampron, Bucks; LANCASTER; FRANKLIN; TIOGA, Garber; Huntinepon ; Biatr.—Exceedingly common and very variable. 78 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. 97. Carex alopecoidea, Tuckerman. CLEARFIELD and ELx, McMinn, 1868.—Very rare. 98. Carex disticha, Hudson. Erte, Presque Isle, Garber.—No other station known. 99. Carex tenella, Schkuhr. Troaa, Garber; E.x, McMinn.—Probably not infrequent in high mountain-bogs, along our northern border. 100. Carex rosea, Schkuhr. Monrogr, Knipe; NoRtTHAMPTON, Easton; LANCASTER; FRANK- LIN. 101. Carex rosea, Schk., var. radiata, Dewey. Wayne, Garber ; Monror, Water Gap, Knipe; Bucxs, (Moyer’s Cat.); Cuesrer, (FI. Cestr.); LAncAsTER; FRANKLIN; CLEAR- FIELD, McMinn.—Common. 102. Carex rosea, Schk., var. retrofiexa, Torrey. Wayne, Garber; NorrHampton, Easton; LANcAsTER.—Rare. 108. Carex sparganioides, Muhl. NorrHampton; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); PHILADELPHIA, Diffen- baugh; LANCASTER; FRANKLIN; ALLEGHENY, Knipe. 104, Carex Muhlenbergii, Schkuhr. Monroe, Water Gap, Knipe; NorrHampron, Easton, Seiders- ville, Bechdolt; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); CHrstrer, (Fl. Cestr.); FRANKLIN; Huntinapon, Lowrie; Lycomina and CLEARFIELD, McMinn; ALLEGHENY, Knipe. 105. Carex Muhlenbergii, Schk., var. enervis, Boott. PHILADELPHIA, Woodlands, Canby.—Very rare. 106. Carex cephalophora, Muhl. Monroe, Water Gap, Knipe; NorrHampron; Bucks; Pura- DELPHIA, Leidy; LANCASTER; FRANKLIN; CLEARFIELD and ELK, McMinn. 107. Carex cephalophora, Muhl., var. angustifolia, Boott. Erte, Presque Isle, Garber. 108. Carex echinata, Murray, (C. stellulata, Gooden.), var. conferta, Bailey. Wayne, Garber; ScHUYLKILL, Broad Mtn.; Lycomrne, McMinn; Lancaster, New Texas, J. J. Carter. 109. Carex echinata, Murr., va. microstachys, Boeckeler. Mownror, Water Gap; Knipe; NorrHampron; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); Corstrer, (Fl. Cestr.); Berxs, near Reading; LANCASTER. 110. Carex canescens, L. “Wayne, Garber; Monror, Pocono; ScHuYLKILL; SULLIVAN, 1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 79 Lake Mtn., A. H. Smith; Jerrerson, McMinn.—Peat-bogs, in the mountains. 111. Carex canescens, L., var’. alpicola, Wahl. Monroe, Pocono, Dr. Traill Green; WAyNkE, Garber; CENTRE, Bear meadows, Lowrie—Rarer than the type. 112. Carex trisperma, Dewey. Wayne, Garber; Monror, Water Gap, Knipe; ScHuyLKILL; Sutiivan, C. E. Snvith—F requent and abundant in mountain-bogs. 113. Carex bromoides, Schkuhr. Monrog, Tannersville, Garber; NorrHampron; Bucks, Moyer; CueEstER, (FI. Cestr.); FRANKLIN; SuLirvan, A. H. Smith; HunNTINGDON; JEFFERSON, McMinn. 114, Carex Deweyana, Schweinitz. SuLiivan, C. E. and A. H. Smith; Erte, Presque Isle, Garber. Very rare. 115. Carex siccata, Dewey. Nortuampton, Bethlehem, Fiot—The only station known. 116. Carex tribuloides, Wahl. CC. lagopodioides, Schk.); Norruampton; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); CHrsrrer, (FI. Cestr.); Lancaster; Tioca, Garber; Huntincpon; Buatrr, Lowrie— Common. 117. Carex tribuloides, Wahl., var. cristata, Bailey. NortHampron; LANcAsterR; Lycominec, McMinn; Huntinepon. Scarcer than the type. 118. Carex scoparia, Schkuhr. Monroe, Pocono; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); LANcAstER; Buarr, Boecking; ALLEGHENY, Knipe—Very common. 119. Carex adusta, Boott. Mowror, Pocono; LackKAWANNA, Carbondale, Garber; Norru- AMPTON, Easton; Bucks, Moyer; VeNANGo, East Sandy Creek, Garber.—Rare. 120. Carex straminea, Schkuhr. NortHampron; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); Cursrer, (FI. Cestr.)'; LANCASTER; ‘FRANKLIN; BLAIR; CLEARFIELD, McMinn.—Very variable. 121. Carex straminea, Schk., var. aperta, Boott. Lycomrine, A. H. Smith; Etx, MeMinn.—Rare. 122. Carex alata, Torrey. Monrok, Pocono Summit, on the D. and L. R: R—Not known elsewhere. 80 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. Two more species have been assigned to our flora, but they lack confirmation. Mr. Bailey, in his Synopsis, makes the range of C. gynocrates ex- tend into Pennsylvania, without mention of any station or collector. It may be looked for in the northern tier of counties along the N. York line. Muhlenberg, in his Descriptio uberior Gramimum ete., p. 265. under C. lagopus ?, which is C. Fraseri, Andrews, adds these words, “Habitat in Tyger- Valley Pennsylvaniae, unde siccam habeo et vivam.” Kin, the German gardener who collected in 8. W. Pennsylvania, brought it home and his label reads thus, “ Deigher Walli in der Wilternus.” Dr. Gray has shrewdly conjectured that by “Deigher Walli,” or ‘lyger Valley, is meant Tygart’s Valley, which lies fur- ther south, in Virginia. When the late Dr. Garber visited Fayette and Greene counties, in the service of the College, he made, by my direction, particular inquiry after a valley of that name, but no one had heard of it Yet he discovered there, on our side of Mason and Dixon’s line, Aristolochia Sipho, and, a little further north, in the same range, occurs Pyrularia oleifera, so that it is not at all un- likely, that, some day, this rare and most singular Carex will be found lurking in one of the Jateral valleys or ravines along the western slope of Chestnut Hill The list above given comprises 98 species and 24 varieties—a goodly number, which may be increased somewhat. The sending to him of any new or rare species, or specimens of those more common, from the counties not thoroughly explored, will be accounted by the au- thor as a special favor, and duly acknowledged. The following European species have been collected by Mr. Isaac Burk on the ballast-grounds at Philadelphia—C. Davalliana, Lam., C. distans, L; C. hirta, L. and C. ornithopoda, With. Easton, Penna., March 4th., 1887. * A box containing the Carices of Muhlenberg has just been discovered in the Herbarium of the Academy, Philadelphia, and the label attached to the specimens of Kin’s collection places Tyger Valley “prope amnem Kenahway.” 1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 81 MARCH 29. The President, Dr. Lrtpy, in the chair. Twenty-seven persons present. The death of Pierre Munzinger, a member was announced. The following were elected members :— William P. Wilson, Richard B. Westbrook, Albert W. Vail, George O. Praetorius and William Blasius. Prof. W. K. Brooks of Baltimore was elected a correspondent. The following was ordered to be printed :— 82 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. THE SUMMIT PLATES IN BLASTOIDS, CRINOIDS, AND CYSTIDS, AND THEIR MORPHOLOGICAL RELATIONS. BY CHARLES WACHSMUTH AND FRANK SPRINGER. Messrs. Robert Etheridge Jun. and Dr. P. Herbert Carpenter, have recently published, under the auspices of the Trustees of the British Museum, a most important and valuable contribution to palaeontological research, in the form of a memoir, which is in effect a Monograph of the British Blastoids.* The work is marked by a thoroughness and wealth of illustration, characteristic of the scientific publications on special subjects issued under the patronage of the British Goverment, which makes us wish that the facilities offered by our own government in that direction might be a little more extensive. The high reputation of the authors is such an ample guarantee of scientific excellence in the execution of the work, that it is scarcely necessary to do more than allude to the fact of its appearence. The points as to which we should venture to differ with the authors are but few; upon these, however, we regret we find ourselves materially at variance with their views. The whole of chapter IV, from p. 66 to 74 inclusive, is devoted to a discussion of the summit plates and their morphological relations. The authors undertake to prove that while the summit plates in the Blastoids do not present, as a rule, any very definite arrangement (p. 118), yet they exhibit a series of variations in number and position, in some degree corresponding with a similar but more extensive series of variations among the Palaeocrinoidea; that both exhibit a transition from five closely united plates fully covering the summit, to a set of six proximal plates surrounding a central one. The six proximal plates are held by them to be the homologues of the five oral plates of the Neocrinoidea—a theory to which the division of the proximals into six or more has always interposed a very serious difficulty. If such a transition from five closely fitted plates to six or more around another could be established, of course its tendency would be to diminish the diffi- *Catalogue of the Blastoidea in the Geological Department of the British Museum (Natural History), with an Account of the Morphology and Systematic Position of the Group, and a Revision of the Genera and Species, By Robert Etheridge Jun. and P. Herbert Carpenter, D. Sc., F. R. S., P. L. S.-4 to.—Pp. I- XVI, 1-322; 20 plates. London. Printed by order of the Trustees, 1886. PROC. ACAD. NAT. SCI. PHILADA, 1887. PL. IV. WACHSMUTH & SPRINGER, SUMMIT PLATES OF BLASTOIDS ETC. 1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 83 culty; but it remains to be seen how far the authors have succeeded in proving it. A covering of the summit openings in various genera has been described by several writers. This has been generally considered as representing the same structure in all these genera; whereas there is to be found among the coverings, thus described, two distinct structures, which are totally different from each other, and are characteristic, so far as observed, of distinct groups of the Blastoidea. The first of these of which any detailed account has been attempted, was observed by Roemer in 1851, in Elaeacrinus Verneuili,* which he described as having the summit plates closed by a hexagonal central plate, surrounded by six others, four of equal size and two smaller. Shortly afterwards Shumard,' in describing his new species Pentremites Sayi, stated that “the central opening is closed by minute, usually pentagonal and hexagonal plates, arranged in a manner somewhat similar to those of Pentremites (Elaeacrinus) Verneuili,’ and he added in a note:—“the same structure occurs in Pentremites Norwoodi and P. melo Owen and Shumard, of which I have fully satisfied myself from an attentive examination of many specimens.” In 1863, Dr. White, in a paper on the summit structure of Pentremites, * confirmed the observations of Shumard as to Pentrenvites Norwoodi, and stated that in this species the whole central space between the summit tubes and the anal aperture “is overlaid with an integument of microscopic plates, entirely covering the central aperture, passing out between the bases of the tubes in a double series of plates, and was evidently continued far down the central grooves of the pseudambulacral fields.’ He also discovered in P. stelliformis* a covering of the central summit aperture “essentially the same as in P. Norwoodii,’ and he described it as consisting of “five small plates, arranged like a five pointed star, with the points touching each of the upper ends of the interradial plates, thus completely covering the summit aperture.” Figures of the summit plates of Giranatocrinus Norwoodi and Orophocrinus ( Codonites) stelliformis were subsequently published by Meek and Worthen, * confirming the observations of Shumard and *Archiv f. Naturgesch., 1851. Jahrg. XVI, p. 378. 1 Palaeontology, in Swallow’s Geol. Surv. Mo. 1855, p. 186. » Bost. Journ. Nat. Hist. 1863, Vol. VII, No. 4, p. 484. 3 Ibid. p. 487. * Illinois Geol. Rep., Vol. V. Pl. IV, figs. 2a, 5. 84 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. White; and we ° in 1881 gave a figure of the summit covering in Schizoblastus ( Granatocrinus) Sayi. In 1858, Shumard ° described what he took to be a somewhat similar covering in a specimen of Pentremites conoideus, which he figured and described as having the central stelliform space (mouth) “perfectly closed by six small, microscopic plates, a central one of a pentangular form surrounded by five smaller pentagonal pieces, which unite with the edges of the aperture and form a little dome. The five ovarial openings are each, in like manner, closed, as represented in the figure by six minute polygonal plates, so arranged as to forma little elevation.” Shumard’s description of P. conoideus was endorsed by Billings’ who copied his figure, but modified it by adding a small pore at each of the five angles, through which, as he thought, the ambulacra entered the interior. The fact of the closure of the summit opening in the above mentioned species, and in Pentremites generally, has on the other hand been denied by Dr. Hambach,’? who states that the central opening “was never closed by additional plates, as intimated by some authors (Billings and Shumard), although specimens are frequently found (and I have some in my collection) where it appears as if the summit were closed by additional plates, which, on close examination, however, prove to be Bryozoa or ovulum-—like bodies.” In a subsequent paper he * says that Shumard’s original specimen of P. Sayi, which was figured in the Missouri Report, “proves to have only a covering of minute calc-spar crystals on the summit, leavings of the surrounding matrix, which could easily be removed by applying a moist camel’s hair brush to them;” and he adds—‘“my specimens which show such a covering * * * prove that the covering consists only of fragments of broken up pinnulae which were washed into the ambulacral furrows and remained there.” As to Hambach’s general statement that the central opening was never closed by additional plates, he has undoubtedly been misled by the condition of his specimens. We are certain that if he were to examine the numerous specimens in our collection of Schizoblastus Sayi, Granatocrinus Norwoodi, G. melo, Orophocrinus stelliformis, 5 Revision of the Palaeocrinoidea Pt. II, Pl. XIX, fig. 3. ma 6 Trans. St. Louis, Acad. Sci. 1858, Vol, I No. 2, p. 243. 1 Amer. Journ. Sci. 1869, Vol. XLVIII, p. 82. 2 Trans. St. Louis, Acad, Sci., 1880, Vol. IV, p. 150. 3 Trans. St. Louis, Acad., Sci., 1884, Vol. IV No. 3, p. 540. 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 85 O. conicus, O. fusiformis, an undescribed Mesoblastus from New Mexico—to say nothing of Elaeacrinus from various localities, and of three different species—all having the central opening per- fectly closed by plates, he would come to a different conclusion. We have found Schizoblastus Sayi in especially good preservation, with summit plates firmly attached and unincumbered by deposition of fragments of any kind. It is by no means rare to find specimens of this species, in which the summit plates and portions of the coy- ering pieces are in place. They may be seen in several collections in Burlington, and these parts may be vigorously brushed with the stiffest bristles with entire safety. The same may be said of all the above named species, and there can be no sort of question that a plated covering does actually exist in all of them. , With regard to the type specimen of Pentremites conoideus, how- ever, we are fully convinced that Hambach is right, and that his definition of the so called plates described and figured by Shumard as covering the center and ovarial openings, as “ovulum—like bodies,” for which he was somewhat sharply ridiculed by Dr Carpenter * is a perfectly correct statement. The species occurs abundantly at Spurgen Hill, Ind. in a friable, light-colored oolitic limestone, which is composed almost entirely of minute organisms, small bivalves, Gasteropods, etc., and these are interspersed profusely with small egg-shaped bodies of almost uniform size. Nearly every specimen of Pentremites from that locality has some of these bodies exposed at the openings, but we find nowhere any regularity in their arrange- ment, and they are seen equally plain in much worn and weathered specimens. Prompted by a strong desire to examine Shumard’s type, the speci- men from which his figure was made, we applied to Dr. Hambach for the loan of it from the Museum of the Washington University at St. Louis, and he forwarded it to us with a promptitude and court- esy, for which he has our warmest thanks. The specimen is very interesting, and shows clearly that Shumard’s figure is a fiction The center appears to be closed, and also the spiracles, not by plates, but by foreign particles such as we have described above. The specimen has the appearance of considerable weathering; none of the outlines are sharp, and the spiracles, which in good specimens are markedly angular, are here almost round. In one of the spira- cles only, the arrangement of the particles appears somewhat like Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 5, Vol. VITI., 1881, p. 422. 86 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. Shumard’s figure. At a hasty glance there seem to be six pieces, a central one surrounded by five others; but when examined under a strong magnifier there appear two pieces in the center, and six sur- rounding them. From this one spiracle, the arrangement of the supposed plates in all the other openings was probably inferred, and the figure made accordingly; for the arrangement of the so- called plates at the four other openings is altogether different, and very irregular. So we find at the anal opening a good sized Gaster- opod beside other pieces. The central opening is covered by a single, comparatively large, elongate body, ovoid in form, which does not actually close the open- ing, but rests inside of it, beneath the level of the deltoids, slightly touching them. Its position is such that if it represented the sum- mit structure, the food grooves could not have entered the peristome This is also one of those foreign bodies to which we alluded, but its surface is too much worn to say much about it. Etheridge and Carpenter’ express some doubt of the correctness of Shumard’s description as to the plates covering the spiracles, although they take Hambach to task (pp. 68, 164) for disputing the same description as to the covering of the central opening. They allude, however, to White’s discovery of a plated integument over the anal opening in Orophocrinus stelliformis, which we are able to confirm. This covering we have found well preserved, not only in O. stelliformis, but also in two new species which we de- scribed for Vol. VIII. of the Illinois Report now in prepara- tion. In all cases where we found this structure intact, it lies below the level of the deltoid through which the aperture penetrates, and is composed of a large number of small, irregular pieces without any visible opening. We do not mean to say that the peristome and spiracles were not covered by plates in P. conoideus, but we do assert that there was no such covering as figured by Shumard. Even in the shape of the spiracles his figure is totally erroneous. He represents them as very regularly pentangular, so as to receive the five supposed plates neatly filling the angles, and as surrounding a central one, one of their sides facing the central opening instead of an angle. The fact is, however, the spiracles are not pentangular but quadrangular, somewhat un- equally diamond-shaped with sides slightly curving, the outer angle obtuse, conforming to, and in fact formed by, the slope of the side 1 Catalogue of the Blastoidea, p. 69 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 87 pieces of adjacent ambulacra. The opposite angle toward the centre is acute, and is occupied by a shallow groove which projects in form of a lip toward the center. This form of the opening is remarkably con- stant in all the specimens of this species, and is characteristic not only of the genus Pentremites but also of Pentremitidea. That in Pentremites a considerable portion of the spiracles was closed by plates of some kind, we think quite probable, but the structure was certainly very different from that described by Shumard. In 1850, Owen and Shumard * discovered a peculiar summit struct- ure in Pentremites in a specimen of P. Godoni, which they described as a “conical covering of small plates.” In 1858 Shumard? ob- served a similar structure in P. sulcatus, of which he gave the fol- lowing account. “In this fossil there rises from the center of the summit a little pyramid with five salient and five retreating angles, the salient angles being directly opposite the extremities of the inter- radial pieces, while the retreating angles correspond to the center of the pseudo-ambulacral fields. The base of this little pyramid is joined to the superior edges of the pseudo-ambulacral fields so as to completely roof in the buccal and ovarial apertures. It con- sists of about fifty pieces, arranged in ten series; the first or exterior ones in each series being of a triangular form, the others elongated quadrilateral. ‘Two series of pieces stand over each ovarial aperture, those of one side uniting with their fellows of the opposite side at the salient angles of the pyramid.” No further attention was paid to this structure until 1884, when Hambach* proposed to amend Shumard’s description by adding that this cone-shaped body “consists of little tubes running parallel with each other and roofing in the summit of the calyx in a con- ical shape (but not the central opening.) They protude through the same apertures in which the hydrospires terminate; there are about five of these tubes to each aperture, which seem to correspond with the plicas of the hydrospiric sac.” He concludes that these tubes extend down into the interior of the calyx, and he takes them “to be the ovarian tubes.” We can confirm Hambach’s observation as to the existence of elongate pieces having the external appearance of tubes placed side by side, though we do not concur in his inference of a connection 1 Journ. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phil., Vol. II. Pt. I, p. 65 2Trans. St. Louis Acad. Sci., Vol. I, No. 2, p. 244. 1 Trans. St. Louis Acad.Sci. 1884,Vol. II, No. 3, p. 541 88 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. with his so-called “ovarian tubes,” for we have been unable to find any evidence that they pass into the calyx, or that they are longi- tudinally perforate. We have been so fortunate as to obtain a large series of specimens exhibiting the structure under consideration in more or less perfec- tion in several species, and we are thereby enabled to present a somewhat fuller description of its nature. We have observed it in P. sulcatus in 2 specimens ; P. Godoniin 2 specimens ; P. pyriformis in 4 specimens; P. elegans in 19 specimens; P. cervinus in 3 speci- mens; and P. abbreviatus in 5 specimens, in all conditions of presery- ation. It consists in most of them of ten series of pieces—that 1s five double series, going out in salient angles toward the extremities of the inter- radial pieces (deltoids)—while in other species the series seem to be composed of more than two rows, and they are not so regularly ar- ranged as in species with only two series. The pieces are located at both sides of, and apparently within, the so called spiracles. They are, as clearly shown in perfect specimens, not plates but elon- gate, tapering spines, closely packed together, comparatively robust, with a more or less obtusely quadrangular and sometimes, perhaps triangular section, usually curving a little at the tips toward the center. They vary in length, the outer ones being the shortest, those toward the center the longest. We have been unable to dis- cover anything like transverse sutures or longitudinal perforations, and they probably consist of a single solid piece. -Although limited to the spiracles, their tips are generally drawn together so as to form a kind of roof over the central opening, while if standing erect they would leave a spaceinthe middle. The spines apparently have nocon- nection whatever with the ambulacra ; the side pieces run out and dis- appear at the spiracles, forming in fact their outer border, and only the food grooves pass in between them to the peristome. Whether the spines cover the spiracles directly, or rest upon independent plates, we cannot say positively, but we are inclined to think that the latter may be the case, and the plates bearing them are set in around the inner margin of the spiracles, so as to cover the greater part of the opening, leaving perhaps a shallow channel passing toward the center over the lip which we have described above. That the spines, or plates bearing them, extended only over a part of the so-called spiracles, is strongly indicated by the condition of a very interesting specimen of the type of Pentremites symmetricus Hall, from Chester, Ill., in which it seems as if the whole pyra- . 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 89 mid and the covering pieces along the ambulacra, at least near the mouth, were intact and in place when the animal was deposited. It is enveloped in a fine grained silicious mud, fine enough to pass through the smallest opening, and to leave a cast of all cavities. In this specimen there appears over the actinal center a small round- ed knob, from which pass out radially, along the upper part of the food grooves, delicate string-like impressions of the inner part of the closed groove. From the inner angles of the spiracles, and passing over the lip-like projections at those angles, are small elevated rounded ridges connecting with the central knob, while the other portion of the spiracle is depressed sufficiently to receive a good sized set of plates. Considering that the parts composed of this fine mud are the counterparts of open spaces as they existed when the speci- men was imbedded—all plates and spines being removed by disinte- gration after it weathered out of the matrix—we may infer that there was at the inner angle of the so-called spiracle a small channel or opening, which probably served as the true spiracle, while the re- mainder of the aperture—which in this view of the case would repre- sent a mere break in the test—was all covered. At the posterior opening the mud mould occupies a larger space, indicating a larger opening ; otherwise we are not able from our specimens to give any special account of the anal opening; neither can we observe any special difference in the arrangement of the spines about the pos- terior opening from that of the others. The shape and construction of the spiracles in Pentremitidea is very similar to that of Pentremites, and we should not be surprised to find its summit surmounted by a similar structure. We fully agree with Etheridge and Carpenter in placing these two genera in the same family, but we are not so sure as to Mesoblastus, which we think might be placed more appropriately with Schizoblastus and Cryptoblastus. The condition of the central opening in Pentremites gannot be accurately determined from any of our specimens, but we have distinctly seen that it is covered by several plates, independent of the roofing by spines. The food grooves, which pass out between the spines at the re- treating angles of the cone, are vaulted over by two rows of cover- ing pieces which are alternately arranged. These pieces close the central groove of the ambulacrum, whence they branch off so as to cover also the lateral grooves toward the pinnules. The plates cov- 7 90 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. ering the side grooves, which are arranged as regularly as those of the main grooves, have been traced by us as far as the fifth side pieces, but may have extended farther down. Th spite of their small size, the plates are very distinct in our specimens, those of the. upper row resting closely against the spines. Messrs. Etheridge and Carpenter have given two fioaee showing the summit of Pentremites in two different conditions of preservation, both of them from specimens belonging to us. The first figure of P. sulcatus, (Pl. I, fig. 8.), gives a somewhat incorrect impression of the external appearance of the pyramid, owing to. the fact that the spines composing it have been irregularly broken off a little way above their bases, so that what there appear as plates are really the cross sections of the spines. The fracture, however, is not regular, nor at right angles to the long dimension of the spines, so that the figure does not correctly represent either the real form of the cross sections, or their relative positions. We may observe also that the figure does not give the central portions. By applying a little ani- line coloring matter we have been able to see the sutures indicating the broken ends of spines, but the fracture is so irregular that the arrangement cannot be distinguished. In their other figure on PI, V, fig, 28., which gives a good idea of the form and character of the spines composing the pyramid, some of the pinnules are pre- served overlapping the spines and resting upon them, showing in marked contrast the difference between the two structures. After quoting and commenting upon Shumard’s and Hambach’s descriptions of the pyramid in P. sulcatus, and haying before them the original specimens represented in the above mentioned figures, Etheridge and Carpenter! give their intrepretation of the facts as follows: “Mr. Wachsmuth has sent us a fine specimen, which may per- haps throw some light on this difficult question, (Pl, I, fig. 8.) The peristome and spiracles are almost completely covered by what seems to be the base of the little pyramid described by Shumard.” The upper part of the pyramid described by Shumard and Hambach “seems to us to be constructed by the proximal pinnules, as in the specimen represented on PI. V, fig. 28. In Mr. Wachsmuth’s ex- ample of P. sulcatus, however, these proximal pinnules are not pre- served, and the angles of the pyramid extend outwards towards the pointed ends of the visible parts of the deltoids. At two of these angles there seem to be indications of a double series of plates above 1 Catalogue of the Blastoidea, p, 70. 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 91 b) the spiracles.” They “have little doubt that this is fundamentally the same structure as was seen by both Shumard and Hambach.” According to the latter author, there are “about five” of the sup- posed tubes to each spiracle ; while Shumard says that two series of pieces stand over each opening, and except in the anal interradius this seems to be the condition of Mr. Wachsmuth’s specimen also. But we do not think that the pieces have the tubular nature which Hambach assigns to them; for we doubt whether they are more than the proximal pinnules grouped around the peristome as shown in our Pl. V, fig. 28.” In their explanation of the plate, this figure is said to be a “ra- dial view of a decorticated specimen, with the pinnules rising above into a kind of dome.” No allusion is made to any difference be- tween the bundles of jointed pinnules which fall over the summit from each side, and the set of apparently rigid, erect and jointless appendages which are seen between them. Nor do the authors any- where in the text appear to recognize any such difference, although it is to us quite apparent, both in the figure and in the specimen which was before them. After arriving at this as a probable interpretation of the struct- ures observed by Shumard and Hambach and figured by themselves, and dissenting from Hambach’s supposition, that the so-called tubes pass down into the interior of the calyx, they arrive at this further conclusion: “We are much more inclined to think that we have here to deal with an extension of the smaller system of summit plates, which occur in other Blastoids. In Granatocrinus and Elae- acrinus only the peristome appears to be covered, (PI. VII, figs, 4. 11.15; Pl. XVIII, fig. 16), except perhaps for the anal aperture in G. Norwoodi; while Orophocrinus and Stephanocrinus have a group of plates around the anal aperture (Pl. XIX, fig. 9). In Pentre- mites conoideus the other four spiracles are perhaps also closed by plates ; and except in the larger size and abundance of the plates it is no great advance from this condition to that which we have seen in Pentremites sulcatus (Pl. I, fig. 8.), but we await further informa- tion.” The supposed closure of the spiracles by plates in Pentremites conoideus proves to be unsupported by the facts. A correct under- standing of the nature of the pyramid surmounting the vault in Pentremites sulcatus and allied species will, we think, fully demon- strate that this structure, which probably existed in all Pentremites, is a totally different thing from the covering of the anus in Oropho- 92 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. crinus, Stephanocrinus or Granatocrinus. In the three latter types, the so-called covering does not extend to the spiracles, but consists apparently of a sort of moveable plates, by means of which in va- rious ways the anal aperture could temporarily be opened or closed as its functions required. The views expressed by Etheridge and Carpenter that these spine- like pieces forming the pyramid are nothing but the proximal pin- nules, cannot, in our opinion, be sustained by any of the evidence. There are very serious objections to it :— 1. They consist of a single piece throughout their entire length, whereas pinnules are composed of small joints. The specimens all show this distinction well, and it may be clearly seen in Eth- eridge and Carpenter’s Pl. V, fig. 28. 2. They have no ventral groove, and taper to a point; while pinnules are nearly uniform throughout, and especially do not taper perceptibly from their bases. 3. They are more robust than the pinnules in the same specimen, and shorter—the pinnules passing beyond their tips. 4. The best preserved specimens show that the pinnule sockets end at the spiracles where the two rows of adjoining ambulacra come to- gether in a point. The spines, however, seem to begin where the pinnules end, and extend from there inward, the clusters widening toward the center so as to form the retreating angles at the base of the pyramid. 5. The spines are interradial and interambulacral, and as such may belong to an interambulacral system, which perhaps is unre- presented in other groups of the Blastoids, but certainly form no part of the ambulacral system. Whatever the spines in Pentremites may be, or represent mor- phologically, we think it will have to be conceded that they are not “proximal pinnules,” and not comparable to the plates covering the anus of Orophocrinus, Stephanocrinusgor Granatocrinus. On page 73, Messrs. Etheridge and Carpenter attempt to establish a series of variations in the summit plates of the Blastoids, “similar to that which can be traced among the Palaeocrinoids. The sim- plest form of summit which occurs in any Blastoid is that presented by Stephanocrinus. The peristome is completely closed by the five triangular plates of the so-called proboscis.” They state that Hall, in his diagram of the structure of the summit in Elaeacrinus elegans* 115th. Rep. N. Y. St. Cab. Nat. Hist. 1862, p. 158. 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 93 figures only five plates of equal size; and they add :—“ These five plates of Stephanocrinus and Elaeacrinus have exactly the same re- lation to the peristome and ambulacraas the oral plates of a Neocri- noid, and we do not see how their mutual homology can well be dis- puted.” On page 74 they continue: “The difference between Elaeacrinus elegans or Stephanocrinus and E. Verneuili, as described by Roemer, is very much the same as that between Culicocrinus and the simplest form of Platycrinus. Stephanocrinus, like Culico- crinus, has but five plates in the vault; while in E. Vernewili there are at least seven, viz.: one orocentral, four proximals of equal size, and two smaller ones on the anal side.” They allude to White’s description of the summit of Ovrophocrinus stelliformis as consisting of five small plates ete., which they say is “‘just as in Stephanocrinus and in Elaeacrinus elegans’—though they add that their arrange- ment does not seem to be very constant. On page 75, they speak of the summit of Granatocrinus Norwoodi varying in a similar man- ner, and of a “somewhat less regular arrangement” in Schizoblastus Sayi. It thus appears that their conclusion that the plates of the vault in Blastoids “rarely exhibit any definite arrangement,”(p. 118) and that there is a series of variations in the summit plates of the Blas- toids similar to, and to some extent parallel with, those which they assume to exist in Palaeocrinoids, is based on the presence of five plates in Stephanocrinus ; the assumption of five plates in Elaeacrinus elegans and Orophocrinus stelliformis, in contrast with seven plates in E. Verneuili; and variability in the number and arrangement of plates in the summit of Granatocrinus Norwoodi and Schizoblastus Sayi. It is somewhat unfortunate for the validity of this speculation that Stephanocrinus cuts so important a figure in it, as it has since been discovered to be not a Blastoid at all, but a brachiate Crinoid; a fact,’ it is proper to say, which is noticed by the authors in their preface. This genus, therefore, must be eliminated from among the premises on which the argument is built, and the “simplest form” must be looked for elsewhere. Let us see how far the others will stand the test of examination. Elaeacrinus elegans was described by Hall? under Nucleocrinus, and in his specific description,—and not simply in his generic diag- 1 Revision of the Palaeocrinoidea, Pt. III, p. 282, etc. 215th, Rep. N. Y. St. Cab. Nat. Hist. 1862 .p. 147. 94 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. nosis, as stated by Etheridge and Carpenter—he says the summit is “oecupied by five or more small plates.” In the diagram, on page 153 of the work cited, the summit is represented as divided into five equal and similar areas by the meeting of lines prolonged from the middle of the ambulacra. It is apparent that no attempt was made to give the exact form or number of those plates. They are not let- tered as the other plates are, and no mention is made of them in the explanation of the figure; nor does Hall anywhere seem to have at- tached sufficient importance to the summit plates to give a descrip- tion of their shape, position, arrangement, or relative size. ' In order to satisfy ourselves as to what the real facts are, we ap- plied to Prof. R. P. Whitfield for the loan of the type specimen of E. elegans showing the summit plates, now in the collection of the American Museum of Natural History in New York City. Prof. Whitfield, with his usual kindness, for which we are under renewed obligations to him, promptly sent us the original specimen from which fig. 14, of Pl. I, as wellas the diagram on page 153 of the 15th Report was made; and in his letter transmitting it he says: “T fear you will not see clearly the arrangement of the plates. There are more than five plates—probably eight”. The italics are his. By applying water, colored with aniline, and then moderately brush- ing the surface so as to remove the coloring matter except from the sutures, we were enabled to distinguish the presence of a central piece surrounded by seven others,—four large and uniform, and three smaller ones at the posterior side (fig. 11.) This gives a summit structure substantially the same as that of Elaeacrinus Vernewli, (see Etheridge and Carpenter, Blast. Cat. p. 215). We also applied to Dr. Barris for the loan of his specimens of Elaeacrinus obovatus, and these, together with our own, gave us eight specimens of this species, all having the summit in situ. The four large proximals are readily recognized in most of them, but only a single specimen enabled us to distinguish all the plates as they are shown in fig. 12. In four others, the suture line between the central plate and the small anal piece is seen as plainly as we could wish, but there is no trace of a suture toward the smaller proximals (fig. 13); while in the three remaining ones, including the largest specimen, it appears as if the summit consisted of only five plates (fig. 14.) There is, however, no variation in the form and general outline ot the summit in any of these specimens. The sum- mit in all of them rests posteriorly between the two halves of the 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 95 compound deltoid and against the intermediate large anal plate, and in all of them the lower margin is perforated and occupied by one half of the anal aperture, thus showing that in this species also the summit consists primitively of eight pieces, of which the suture lines became partially obliterated. In the type specimen of Elaeacrinus meloniformis, which Dr. Barris was kind enough to send us also, the arrangement of the summit plates is the same as in EF. obovatus, and we clearly distin- guished the small anal plate. It thus appears that in the known species of El/aeacrinus the summit plates consist of a central plate surrounded by six or more proximals, and that in no case do they consist of five primitive plates; so that the “simplest form of summit’’—five plates only has not been found in Elaeacrinus. The assumed parallelism of differences between EF. elegans and E. Verneuili among the Blastoids, and Culicocrinus and the simplest form of Platycrinus among the Crinoids, encounters a very serious interruption in consequence— unless, indeed, it should turn out that there is a parallelism in these cases of an altogether different character from that contemplated by the English authors. The summit of Orophocrinus stelliformis was stated by White* to consist of “five small plates arranged like a five-pointed star, with the points touching each of the upper ends of the interradial plates.” We do not doubt that Dr. White thought to observe such arrange- ment, but we think it very probable that the condition of his speci- men was such that he overlooked the central plate, which may easily happen, as the sutures are often difficult to observe. Ina large number of specimens we have never found a single one with the summit composed of five plates only, or with a central plate surrounded by five proximals. We found, however, that in speci- mens of this species, as well in Granatocrinus Norwoodi and Schizo- blastus Sayi, when the covering plates are in place, they often partly overlap the summit plates, and in such cases the arrangement of the latter cannot be distinctly observed. When the covering pieces are ab- sent, and the summit plates alone are intact, as in several of our speci- mens, the arrangement is quite regular. We have madea careful ex- amination of a large series of specimens, not only of O. stelliformis but also of our new species O. fusiformis and O. conicus, in which the sum- mit plates are more frequently preserved. In all of them there is a 1 Boston Journ. Nat. Hist. 1863, Vol. VIII, No. 4, p. 487. 96 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. central plate, surrounded by others, either six or seven. Even the original of Etheridge and Carpenter’s figures 11 and 12 on PL. XV, in our collection, upon the application of coloring matter to bring out the sutures, proves to have a quite regular arrangement of the summit plates, which the artist who drew the figures failed to detect. “There are certainly not “five small plates,’ but a central plate surrounded by six proximals. According to our observation, therefore, of the best preserved material known, the summit of O. stelliformis does not represent the “simplest form,”’—“just as in Stephanocrinus.” There remains only to consider Granatocrinus Norwoodi and Schizoblastus Sayi, as to both of which we remark that there is often presented much apparent irregularity and variability in the arrangement of their summit plates. But we find that this is due to the encroachment of the covering plates, which sometimes largely overlap them, as is well shown by Ether. Carpenter’s Pl. VII, figs. 11 and 13. But in natural internal casts, in which we have the impressions of the inner surface of the plates, they appear larger and much more regularly arranged. Among a large number of specimens we have failed to find a single example of a summit closed by only five plates; while in a large proportion of them we distinguished clearly a central plate surrounded by six or more proximals. Whatever variations, however, of form and arrangement of summit plates may be found to exist in these two species, we feel warranted in asserting that the “simplest form” is not one of them. On page 71, (Catal, of the Blastoidea), Messrs. Etheridge and Carpenter say that “in 1877, Wachsmuth pointed out that a definite arrangement of plates is more or less traceable in the vault of many Palaeocrinoids. There is a single central plate, with five or, more frequently, six others disposed interradially round it.” It would naturally be inferred from this remark and the context, not only that five proximals around a central plate is one recognized condition in the vault of many Palaeocrinoids, but also that Wachsmuth had so expressed himself:—whereas the fact is he said nothing of the kind in the paper cited, but on the contrary spoke only of “7 apical plates’”—a central, four large, and two small ones; and this number, or a greater, has been insisted on by us as being the almost universal rule. In seeking for a transition or variation in the summit plates of Palaeocrinoids, comparable to that which they assume to exist 1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 97 among the Blastoids, they take the young stage of Adlagecrinus (p. 72), as presenting “the simplest form of vault,” i. e. five plates without any central; and Haplocrinus next, with a central piece and five proximals, “neither Adl/agecrinus nor Haplocrinus having any calyx interradials.” Culicoerinus is cited as having five large summit plates resting on the calyx interradials, and without any central piece. Then come Platycrinus and the Actinocrinidae as exhibiting varying degrees of complexity, but having a central plate, which they call an also, they base a large part of their argument upon premises which are by no means universally recognized, or are free from dispute. We consider it far from being an established fact, that either Ad/agecrinus or Haplocrinus—Culicocrinus will be considered later on—are without calyx interradials. As we have before stated, Etheridge and Carpenter maintain, and it has been steadily insisted on by Dr. Carpenter since 1879, that the proximal plates, surrounding ‘the central plate in Palaeo- crinoids, their so-called “orocentral,” represent the five orals of Neocrinoidea. This involves the assumption of a homology between a set of plates covering the actinal center, which are five in all stages of the Neocrinoids in which they exist, and a set of plates which, when present in Palaeocrinoids consist of six or more plates, which do not cover the actinal center, but which enclose another structure that does. It is in order to get rid of some of these difficulties that the authors attach so great importance to the cases of Allagecrinus, Haplocrinus, Culicocrinus, Coccocrinus, and Stephanocrinus, in which they undertake to point out a series of five plates at the ventral side, as the representatives of six or more proximals in Palaeocrinoids generally, and which at the same time might be successfully homologized with the orals of the Neocrinoids. In this connection they remark on page 73 :— “Since the preceding paragraph was in type, we have received the latest publication of Messrs. Wachsmuth and Springer, according to whom the five plates which form the ventral pyramid of Stephanocrinus are ‘calyx interradials,’ and cannot therefore be homologous with the orals of a Neocrinoid. In making this comparison Messrs. Wachsmuth and Springer seem to have altogether overlooked the fact that Stephanocrinus has well developed calyx interradials, namely, the deltoids. * * * The American authors regard the deltoid pieces of the Blastoidea, and by implication “oro-central,” surrounded by proximals. In this case 98 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [ 1887. therefore those of Stephanocrinus, as homologous with the large calyx interradials of the Cyathocrinidae, a view in which we entirely concur, as we have explained on p. 10. But in applying this name to the five plates which form the ventral pyramid and cover the mouth of Stephanocrinus, and also of Haplocrinus and Allagecrinus, as they do in their latest publication, they seem to us to be going very much too far. We regard the five summit plates. of all three genera as truly homologous with the orals of the Pentacrinoid larva. They cover the mouth and the origin of the ambulacra, just as the orals do in the Neocrinoid; and this relation is not characteristic of the calyx interradials in any Pelmatozoon whatever. It is only in the Cyathocrinidae and in the Blastoids that these plates have any close relation to the mouth at all. But they do not cover it and shut it off completely from the exterior as: the summit plates of Stephanocrinus and Allagecrinus do.” We have been more than once charged by Dr. Carpenter with inaccurate statements as to his views, and in some cases with reason as we have admitted; but we do not believe we have ever been chargeable with anything so completely unfounded as the foregoing criticism. It is based entirely upon the single remark of ours on page 46 (Revision Palaeocr. Pt. II], that “the ventral pyramid in Haplocrinus and Coccocrinus is composed of interradials and not of orals, and the same may be said of Stephanocrinus.”** This was written under the supposition, then entertained by ‘all Palaeontolo- gists, perhaps with the exception only of Etheridge and Carpenter, whose interpretation will be quoted presently, that Stephanocrinus was constructed of only three ranges of plates, and we considered the third row, constituting the whole portion from the coronal processes inward, to be interradial plates. Messrs. Etheridge and Carpenter’ in 1883, interpreted all plates, in common with the deltoids of the Blastoids generally, and the interradials of the Cyathocrinidae, as orals,—a view which they have since abandoned. In the same paper—p. 239—they mention five plates in the summit, composing, according to Hall, a central “proboscis,” and say that they have “only seen this proboscis in one specimen,” and regard it as “a vault of a few pieces covering in the peristome.” This shows clearly that they did not themselves at that time consider these *We even did not use the term “ca/yx interradials” in that quotation, we simply spoke of the ‘‘zz¢erradials.” 1 Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist. Apr. 1888, pp. 225 to 246. 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 99 “proboscis” plates as representing the orals, and, so far as we know, they never afterwards, until the appearance of the Blastoid Catalogue, gave any other interpretation of the inner ring of plates. If they had regarded them as orals, it would have suggested the presence of two rings of orals, the one within the other. Subsequently we found reason to distinguish two rings above the radials—the so-called orals or deltoids of Etheridge and Carpenter and a series of summit plates—the so-called ‘“proboscis’—from a specimen of S. gemmiformis; and we communicated this fact to Dr. Carpenter as early as Dec. 17th 1885 with a diagram explaining it, stating that, although summit plates in our specimen were not preserved, such plates were probably represented in the species. We also informed him that it was the third ring or deltoids, and not the summit plates, which we took to be the homologues of the interra- dials in Haplocrinus; and that the hypothetical plates closing the summit we took to be represented in Haplocrinus by the central plate. Atthesame time we applied to Prof. Whitfield for specimens to ascertain the summit structure in S. angulatus. From these specimens we at once found beyond all doubt that the plates of the third row in S. angulatus, as well as in S. gemmiformis, do not extend to the oral center, but are followed by five other plates—the so- called “proboscis”—covering the mouth (fig. 3). Upon making this discovery we promptly declared the latter to be the orals, and advised Dr. Carpenter accordingly on January 9th 1886. * Our statement, therefore, that the “ventral pyramid” in Stephanocri- nus is composed of interradials, was made with reference to plates which we then supposed to be a single element, extending to, but not covering the oral center, and which Etheridge and Carpenter had previously announced to be orals followed by vault pieces, but now consider to be deltoids followed by orals. | When the authors assert that we applied the name “calyx interradials” to the “plates which form the ventral pyramid and cover the mouth of Stephanocrinus and also of Haplocrinus,” we cannot help thinking that they are “going very much too far.’ A similar erroneous statement was made by Dr. Carpenter in March 1886+ and it has been a matter of consid- *Tt is due to Dr. Carpenter to state here that he had privately communicated to us, after Sect. I of Pt. III of our Revision was in print. that he regarded the inner ring of Stephanocrinus as orals, and this led to our correspondence upon the subject. 1Ann, and Mag. Nat. Hist., March, 1886, p. 282 100 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. erable surprise to us that in both these publications we should be held up to criticism for a statement which we did not make in any such form as their language would imply, and that the authors should indulge in a general adverse comment upon our incidental remark on Stephanocrinus, without the slightest intimation of the very important additions to our former views consequent upon new discoveries, which would have made our meaning entirely clear. These were published in Part III, Revision of the Palaeocrinoidea, pp. 282-290. To represent us as arguing that the plates which we recognize as calyx interradials “cover the actinal center,” or “cover the mouth and the origin of the ambulacra,” seems to us very much like setting up a man of straw for the pleasure of knocking him down. For our whole argument in favor of a homology of the orals of the Neocrinoid with the central plate in Palaeocrinoids, has been ex- pressly put upon the ground that the latter plate covers the actinal center ; and one of the strongest objections we have. constantly urged against such a homology with the proximals, has been that they do not (Rev. Pal. Pt. III, p. 53). Etheridge and Carpenter add in continuing their criticism above noticed: “There is not a single Crinoid known in which plates which are universally recognized to be calyx interradials cover in the actinal center.” Of course not; and we do not know of anybody who says they do. But on the other hand it is equally true that there is not a single Palaeocrinoid known in which the plates that are universally recognized as orals cover the whole ventral surface; and upon this ground we might well contend that if the plates which Etheridge and Carpenter consider to be orals are really such, then Allagecrinus and Haplocrinus are Neo- crinoids, in which from the larva to the adult, as a rule the whole ventral surface is covered by actinal structures. Their statement above cited, as to the homology of plates which “cover the mouth and the origin of the ambulacra, just as the orals do in Neocrinoids,” might be profitably applied to the case of Caryocrinus, as shown by a number of excellent internal casts recently obtained from Racine, Wisconsin. Caryocrinus has a large central piece, and this is surrounded usually by eight plates, which are arranged in a totally different manner from the so-called proximals of the Palaeo- crinoidea. Three of them are radial, the others interradial, (figs. 6- 7). The interradial pieces alternate with the radial ones, one to each side, except at the anal interradius where three smaller pieces 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 101 take the place of the single one at the two other sides. Like most of the Cystidea, Caryocrinus has no true radials, although it has well developed arms. The rays start from underneath the central plate in a similar manner as they do in allied genera from under- neath their quinque-partite oral pyramid; but the ambulacra, instead of entering the surface at once, as in other groups, here remain sub- tegminal until they enter the arms, following the medium line of three radial plates, and branch (fig. 7) underneath them twice to their respective arm openings. In this case, the central piece which “covers the mouth and the origin of the ambulacra” must surely represent the orals if any plate does, but not the plates which sur- round it and cover, neither the mouth nor the origin of the ambu- lacra. We should like to know by what process Messrs. Etheridge and Carpenter will demonstrate the oral nature of either the radial or interradial plates in this form. We have already alluded to the great importance toward the estab- lishment of Etheridge and Carpenter’s oral theory, of their proving the existence both in Crinoids and Blastoids of a summit composed either of five plates only, or of a central plate surrounded by five. This is why the series of parallei transitions or variations in the summit plates of the two groups is so strenuously urged in the Blastoid Catalogue. But it seems to us that the authors have al- together failed to point out a single instance in which five primary plates cover the peristome among the Blastoids. The cases which have been relied upon to prove such a condition, must be attributed to incorrect observation or the want of sufficiently good material. That occasionally in certain species of Elaeacrinus the central piece is more or less coalesced with the proximals of the azygous side, and these with one another so as to obscure the suture lines, as we have shown in our illustrations figs. 12 to 14, cannot alter the case in the least, as they are plainly visible in others, and without any change in the general arrangement of the summit. Nor doesit seem to us that the authors have been any more successful in showing how among Palaeocrinoids the five large plates in Haplocrinus, cov- ering the whole ventral surface except the oral pole, could have been transformed in other groups of the Palaeocrinoidea into six plates covering only a small space around the peristome. These five plates in Haplocrinus occupy the same position, as the primary calyx interradials of other groups, and especially resemble those of Cyathocrinus and Stephanocrinus. (Compare figs. 2 to 5). 102 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. It may not be out of place to mention in this connection that in Haplocrinus there appear radially between the five large ventral plates, upon their lateral edges, five conspicuous grooves (figs. 4 and 5), which were regarded by Prof. Zittel (Handb. d. Palaeont, I, p. 347) as ambulacral furrows. Similar grooves exist in Cyathocrinus, Stephanocrinus and other Inadunata along their interradials, and in all of them the grooves are occupied by the ambulacra. The simi- larity between these grooves, no doubt, induced Prof. Zittel to give to those of Haplocrinus the same interpretation. Unfortunately, however, the central plate of Haplocrinus, as plainly seen in our specimens, does not occupy exactly the same level as the upper an- gles of the five large plates, but lies (Fig. 4) below their level and between them, just as if it were being pushed from within outward so as to separate the five plates at the central space. The peculiar position of the central plate demonstrates, we think beyond any doubt, that the ambulacra of Haplocrinus could not have been ex- posed upon this groove, but at the same time it appears to us that these grooves, which occupy relatively the same position toward surrounding plates and the peristome, and are formed in a similar manner, must represent morphologically the same grooves, which are occupied in higher developed types of this group by the ambul- acra (fig. 3). Supposing that Haplocrinus, as we find it in the fossil state, were but an embryonic stage of the species—the genus has been regarded a permanent larval form of the group—we think we might safely assert from the phylogeny of the Palaeocrinoidea generally, that in the growing animal the central plate was pushed outward so as to appear at a level with the five interradials; that subsequently by the growth of the dorsal cup, and the widening of the peristomial area, proximals appeared around the central piece ; and that at last the ambulacra were pushed out to the surface to occupy the radial grooves, which were present already in the young Haplocrinus. The different stages to which we here have alluded are well represented in palaeontological times throughout the Inad- unata, and not only among them, but also among the Camarata under very similar conditions. The Camarata or Coadunata differ from the Inadunata in having their proximal arm joints incorporated into the calyx by the up- ward growth of interradials; while in the Inadunata the arms re- main free from the first radial, and they have but one interradial which is disposed ventrally. That all Camarata passed temporarily ~ 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 105 in early life through the Inadunata stage, seems to us beyond dis- pute, and we think we may assert that they were for a time in asimilar condition to Haplocrinus, with one interradial plate disposed ven- trally. Limiting our observations among the Camarata to the Platycrinidae, we find, so far as we know, their simplest forms repre- sented by the two early genera Culicocrinus and Coccocrinus, which both have two rows of plates interradially disposed, the one resting with- in the circlet of the other. In Culicocrinus,* if Miller’s figure is correct, the first row of these plates consists of five rather large pieces, one to each interradius, which connect laterally with the primary and secondary arm plates, so as to make them radials and integral parts of the calyx. Those of the second row which are triangular meet laterally and close the center, apparently without any additional plates. Of Coccocrinus two species are known. Coccocrinus bacca has three interradials in the first row, which have a strictly ventral posi- tion, C. rosaceus apparently but one, which is more erect. In both species the plates extend to the height of the third primary radials, and probably higher. The inner row of plates is only known in C. rosaceus, and these, like those of COulicoerinus, are subtriangular, but, unlike them, do not connect laterally with one another, nor do they meet in the center. There is a lateral slit between them all the way to the arm openings, and at the center an open space, which in the fossil is not filled by any further structures. In C. bacca, as stated, the inner plates have not been preserved, but we scarcely doubt that similar plates were present, for we find in a radial direction between the outer plates of the first row, very conspicuous slits, which correspond to those of C. rosaceus. The outer plates, in the two genera, were regarded by Carpenter as calyx interradials, the inner ones as orals, and these he took to be the homologues of the five large ventral plates of Haplocrinus, and of the proximals in other groups. We admit that Coccocrinus and Culicocrinus probably are morph- ologically in a similar condition, and represent early stages in the phylogeny of the Palaeocrinoidea like Al/agecrinus and Haplocrinus, *Through the kindness of Prof F. Roemer, we received a most excellent gutta percha cast of a Cu/tcocrinus with arms, from a mould in the Mineralogical Museum of Breslau, but not showing the ventral covering. Miller’s original fig- ures of the ventral covering, Lethea Geognostica of 1855, Taf. VIII, figs. 1 and 2, we are informed are much restored, and the arrangement of the plates, as there given, not altogether reliable. 104 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887, but we doubt if this is the case in the sense Dr. Carpenter suggests. The two former are Camarata, and as such should be provided with more than one row of interradials, which they would not possess if the inner plates were orals. Based upon palaeontological evidence, we think, we may rea- sonably suggest that in the developmental history of Culicocrinus, at the close of the Inadunata stage, the first row of interradials opened out to connect the proximal arm plate with the calyx, and that a second ring formed to take the place and functions of the first, closed the center. Coccocrinus forms a connecting link between Culicocrinus and Platycrinus. Probably it has one or more summit plates, and the ambulacra disposed between the interradials. In Platycrinus, the inner interradials, which in Coccocrinus are yet placed at a level with the dorsal cup, are considerably more raised. In consequence thereof we find in this genus much larger spaces between the interradials, centrally as well as laterally, and hence better developed summit plates and larger and heavier cover- ing pieces. Of the summit pieces probably the central plate appeared at first—this is indicated by the phylogeny of the group— and the proximals appeared later, filling the vacancies, which gradually had formed around the central plate. In this sketch we have not added anything that is not well sustained by the phylogeny of this group, or is not in accordance with the developmental ‘history of the Palaeocrinoidea generally- Throughout this order, when summit plates are exposed at all, they occupy a comparatively small space around the peristome, and this space increases in width in palaeontological times. In all Palaeo- crinoids, so far as known, and we may add, in all Blastoids, the peristomial area is formed by the calyx interradials, whether these consist of one piece, as in the case of the Inadunata and Blastoidea, or of two, three, or a dozen pieces, as in the Camarata; and the summit plates, whether composed of a central plate only, or of proximals also, rest against the upper margin of the interradials. In all Neo- crinoidea, however, from the larva to the adult, the whole ventral surface is covered by actinal structures, the small interradials which were observed by Sir Wyville Thomson, disappear again soon after their development, and never attain any such prominence in the composition of the calyx as in the earlier Crinoids. This character, which distinguishes the two groups so readily, would meet with most 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 105 serious exceptions if the ventral plates in Allagecrinus, Haplocrinus, Culicocrinus and Coccocrinus, as asserted by Carpenter, represented the orals. We think it was the superficial resemblance in the form and position of these plates with the orals of certain Neocrinoidea that led Carpenter to regard them as orals. He probably overlooked the fact that the plates agree equally well on those points with the interradials of the Cyathocrinidae, and that as interradials the above genera would not be exceptional types, but comply with the morpho- logical conditions of all their contemporaries. We have shown that Culicocrinus and Coccocrinus, as members of the Camarata, should have more than one interradial plate, and it is not very likely that the secondary one, exceptionally in those genera, would be substituted by a ring of oral plates. But there is another serious difficulty. The slits in C. bacca extend out to the first row of ventral plates as well as to the second, and this suggests that, if Coccocrinus were “like the recent genus Holopus” to be “per- manently in the condition of a crinoid larva, in which the orals have not yet moved away from the radials, though separated from one another,”* then both rows of plates were orals, one ring within the other. Where among the numerous families of the Palaeocrinoidea do we find an instance in which the plates constituting either the oral pyramid or the proximals, are separated in that manner? Nowhere ; but if there was such a case, we certainly would find it in the highest developed forms and not in the larval ones. Again, where do we meet among Palaeocrinoids with an open peristome? In the earliest stages of the Neocrinoid larva, the orals are closed, and in the earlier forms of the Camarata, such as Reteocrinus, Glyptocrinus, etc., the peristome is closed either by the upward growth of the calyx, or by a small central piece, there being no proximals, and hence, accord- ing to Carpenter’s interpretation of these plates, no orals. Those genera appear to us to be in a similar condition to Adlagecrinus and Haplocrinus among the Inadunata, and Culicocrinus and Coccocrinus among the Camarata, but not in the condition of the Neocrinoidea at all. However, we can readily understand why Carpenter holds so tenaciously to these plates as orals, for it is principally upon these plates that he bases his further theory, that in the higher Palaeocri- noidea the orals are represented by the proximals; indeed they are his “simplest forms” which he failed to find among Blastoids. In the Challenger Report on p. 170, he says: “The proximal dome * Chall. Report, p. 163. 8 106 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. plates rest directly against the calyx interradials, that on the poste- rior side being represented by two small plates with the anus between them” while there is a more or less tubercular ring of radial dome plates outside them. These proximal dome plates thus correspond exactly to the orals of Symbathocrinus and Haplocrinus, covering in the peristome and resting against the calyx plates, which in the Platycrinus are the interradials, and not the upper edges of the ra- dials, as in the simpler forms”; and on p. 171: “I cannot therefore see what other view can be taken of the proximal dome plates which immediately surround the orocentral, than to regard them as orals, i. e., as the actinal representatives of the basals, like the correspond- ing platesin Symbathocrinus. If this be admitted, it follows that the proximal dome plates of all Platycrinidae, Actinocrinidae and Rho- docrinidae are also homologous with the orals of Neocrinoids.” These conclusions perhaps might be well enough, 1F such a thing as an orocentral had been established; but unfortunately this is not the case. Neither are the plates in Symbathocrinus of which he speaks as “the orals,” in our opinion, anything but proximals, and hence all conclusions based thereon, to say the least of it, are inex- pedient and rash. It is somewhat surprising that Dr. Carpenter, although his whole theory is actually based upon his hypothetical “orocentral,” gives such a meagre account of it. In the Challenger Report, in introducing it on p. 158, he devotes to it only a few lines. Referring to the small central plate of Haplocrinus, he says: “This plate is one of considerable importance in its morphological relations. In accordance withthe views which I have expressed elsewhere, I believe it to be the representative on the actinal side, or left larval antimer, of the dorsocentral plate which is developed in the center of the right antimer or abactinal side of Urchins, Stellerids, and Crinoids.” And on pp. 159 and 170, in pointing out its relations to the proximals, he calls the plate the orocentral, and speaks of it as a single plate. That is all Dr. Carpenter had to say about it, and probably all that could be said, for such a plate has been here- tofore unknown in Echinoderm morphology. We do not deny that the so called dorsocentral of Urchins and Stellerids is represented in the Comatula larva by the terminal plate of the stem, but we see no good reason to postulate from this a similar plate in the oral center. There are at the abactinal side frequently also underbasals, which on the same principle should be represented orally, but nothing is known of them. Why should 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 107 the dorsocentral be represented at the actinal side when there is no actinal stem, in this or any other group of the Echinoderms? The dorsocentral in the Echinozoa represents in a wider sense the whole column in its simplest form, although in a narrower sense it is the homologue of the first part of the stem that makes its appearance in the embryo. If there was such a thing as an orocentral in fossil Cri- noids, Blastoids and Cystids, it seems to us, it certainly would be rep- resented in the early larva of the living types before the parting of the orals, and in the closed oral pyramid of the Cystids and Steph. anocrinus; but unfortunately for Carpenter’s theory we meet with no trace of it in either one of those forms. The plate which he re- gards as orocentral, occupies the place of the five orals in other groups, and in a similar manner as these, covers the peristome and the origin of the ambulacra. This is conclusively shown by comparing the case of Caryocrinus in which the ambulacra start from beneath the central plate and branch twice underneath the surrounding plates,with the case of Sphaeronites (fig. 1) and Stephanocrinus (fig. 3), in which theambulacrastart from beneath a penta-partite oral pyramid, Does this indicate that the five plates constituting the latter, are the rep- resentatives of the proximals? We doubtit, forthe structural resem- blance is with the central piece. We think the distribution and arrange- ment of the surrounding plates in Caryocrinus proves conclusively that these cannot be orals, for the most ingenious speculator would be unable to reconstruct five primitive plates from such an assemblage of pieces as we find in Caryocrinus and in Von Koenen’s new genus Juglandocrinus*. What those plates may be, whether actinal or abactinal structures, we will not preterid to decide, but we do un- dertake to say that they are not orals, otherwise the rule that there are always five primitive orals meets with avery serious exception. Somewhat more favorable perhaps to Carpenter’s views is the ar- rangement of the proximals in the Palaeocrinoidea and Blastoidea, in which the plates surrounding the central piece are unquestionably actinal structures, and there is a possibility of reconstructing from the six, seven, or more pieces, five primitive plates. We also admit that in all cases where those plates come in direct contact with the anal structures, their arrangement might possibly have been disturbed thereby, but this explanation is not applicable to forms like Megisto- crinus, Dorycrinus and many others, in which the anus is lateral or moved away from the center to the arm regions or even beneath them. But there are several other equally serious objections. *Neues Jahrbuch fur Mineralogie 1886, Bd. II, Taf. IX, Fig. 3. 108 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. In the Comatula larva, which shows a decidedly bilateral symmetry, there are five equal basals and five equal orals. In Thauwmatoerinus, although it has anal plates and a large proboscis, the basals and anals remain undisturbed. The same may be said of the basals of the Palaeocrinoidea and Blasteidea; among which not a single in- stance is known where the basal ring contains either anals or radials, contrary to the proximals, among which nearly always anals and often radials are enclosed. This shows that the presence of such plates, if the proximals in those groups represent the orals, and the latter the basals, would be totally at variance with the general rules of the class both as to orals and basals. The anal plates of the apical side either abut directly against the radials, or are placed between the interradials. In most of the Cam- arata, the first interradial at the azygous side is split into two halves by the first or second anal piece. In others, the second anal is want- ing, but the interradial is composed of two parts as if the anal were present. In a few groups there are no anal plates whatever, and the arrangement of the plates at all five sides is alike. The same variations as among the interradials are found in the arrangement of the proximals,* of which the four large plates corre- spond to the calyx interradials at the four regular sides. The two smaller proximals, which occupy the azygous interradius, either are placed between two radial dome plates or they abut against two of the larger proximals, enclosing generally an anal plate—but this may be absent or pushed downard. f As yet, we have not observed a single instance in which there were five plates around a central one, but should it occur, which we think is very possible, we doubtif Messrs. Etheridge and Carpenter, although finding at last their “simpler form,” will be able to make much out of it in support of their theories. We stated heretofore that fig. A on p. 72 of the Blast. Cat. is erroneous, and this, to some extent is the case with fig. B on the same page. We never saw a Platycrinus with a single interradial, all having three (or more), arranged transversely. Besides, the figure is misleading in not giving the central piece and the so-called radial-dome plates. If these plates had been added, as they should have been to represent the case properly, it would show that the radial-dome plates are placed opposite the radials, the proximals opposite the interradials, and that the central piece takes orally the *For the arrangement of the proximals see Revision Pt. III, pp. 47 to 50. 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 109 position of the coalesced basal disc; a totally ditferent thing from what the English authors attempted to prove by their figure. We are altogether in accord with Goette and Carpenter in their opinion that the orals are represented in the abactinal system by the basals, but we disagree entirely with the latter writer that the basals are represented orally by the proximals. We regard the proximals as an element similar to the interradials, but, while these fill up vacancies in the calyx, the former fill the open space around the peristome as it widens in the growing animal by the increasing width of the dorsal cup. To this conclusion we were led principally by the arrangement of the plates, the presence of radial and anal plates in the same ring with them, and by their gradual appearance in geological times. We further believe the central piece is the only plate which in the Palaeocrinoidea and Blastoidea can possibly represent the quinque-partite oral pyramid. We regard it as being primi- tively composed of five pieces, such as remained intact persistently in Stephanocrinus and most of the Cystidea, but which were fused together by anchylosis in other groups as aborally in the case of the basals, which gradually were reduced from five to three, and in certain groups to one solid piece. The proximals, therefore, in our opinion, are not of that morphological importance as they are regarded by Dr. Carpenter, and we think the same may be said of the so-called radial dome plates. These also, like the proximals, seem to us mere auxiliary pieces, filling up vacancies, beneath which the branching of the ambulacra takes place. If they deserve the term radials at all, they certainly represent the axillaries, and not the oculars or first radials, except perhaps in some very complex species in which there appear three successive pieces to each ray, the inner ones rest- ing against the central plate in a similar manner as the true radials rest against the basals; while the third or axillary one holds to- ward the proximals and the ambulacra the very same relations as the single radial does in the simpler form (See Revision Pt. III, Pl. IV, Fig. 4, and Pl. VIII, Figs. 1, 3.). It is also very significant that frequently in those complex forms there appear toward the cen- ter within the ring of proximals (orals of Ether. and Carp.), two ex- tra axillaries underneath which the two lateral rays, which are united close to the peristome, divide so as to form the antero-and postero- lateral rays. How Dr. Carpenter will explain the presence of these plates within the “oral” ring, which is said to cover the ori- gin of the ambulacra, is a mystery to us, and we look to him for in- 110 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. formation. The radial dome plates, as a rule, disappear when the ambulacra enter the surface, and this explains why they are absent in Blastoids,* Stephanocrinus and the later Cyathocrinidae. We have already alluded to the fact that the proximals are fre- quently unrepresented in the earlier groups, in which, as a rule, the peristomial area is comparatively smaller than in later ones, and closed only by a small central piece. Upon this point it is very in- teresting that we have recently discovered the same thing in later groups under somewhat different conditions. In two cases, the one a species of Talarocrinus from the St. Louis group of Kentucky (Fig. 10), the other a Dichocrinus from the Kinderhook of Iowa, we found the whole space usually occupied by central piece and proximals, although as large asin any Platycrinus, filled completely by an enor- mous, nodose central plate, with the covering pieces abutting against it. Interposed between the ambulacra are a number of small interradial plates, which barely touch the central piece. In these cases, accord- ing to our interpretation, the increasing space of the peristomial area was filled by lateral growth of the orals (central piece), instead of by means of proximals. But according to Carpenter’s generaliza- tions (Challenger Report, p. 171), the insignificant interradials next to the central piece, and between the ambulacra, should be the repre- sentatives of the orals or else his rules would encounter another se- rious objection. Dr. Carpenter regards both Allagecrinus and Haplocrinus as rep- resenting in a phylogenetic sense embryonic stages of the Palaeocri- noidea. If this be true, he has failed to give a reasonable explana- tion how the large plates covering almost the whole ventral side in these low forms, came to be placed in this group so as to occupy only the relatively small space they do in what he regards as higher de- veloped forms. Etheridge and Carpenter undertook to prove it in their paper, Annals and Mag. Nat. Hist., Apr. 1881, p. 289, by im- agining that, in the more mature specimens of Allagecrinus “the orals were relatively carried inwards, away from the radials, and separated from them by perisome ( just as they are in the Pentacri- noid larva of Comatula) when the arms appear above the radials. Whether the orals ever separated so as to open the mouth to the ex- terior, and whether the ring of perisome forming the ventral disk * Etheridge and Carpenter figure, Blastoid Catalogue on PI. XVIII, Fig, 16, Elaeacrinus Verneuili with radial dome plates; none of our specimens show any traces of them. 1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. Lit between them and the radials was naked, as in Rhizocrinus, or plated, as in Hyocrinus, must of course remain undiscovered.” This explanation is suggestive enough of what may occur in the Neocrinoidea, but they fail to give a parallel case in which such a development as this took place in a single Palaeocrinoid, and this omission is the more important since they place the genus A /lageeri- nus in the latter group. They state afterwards (op. cit. p. 289). “It is true we have no proof that there were any orals at all in the older specimens ; but, judging from the relative sizes and development of the largest examples with oral plates, and the smallest without, we think it scarcely likely that they were entirely unrepresented in the adult. It is obvious that, if they were united to the radials by peri- some, whether plated or bare, they would be readily lost under con- ditions that would have had no destructive effect on younger speci- mens, in which there was a closer union between the two rings of plates.” From the foregoing quotation, it is obvious that the Authors de- sired to prove from the fact that the ventral plates were not found preserved in what they regarded as the most mature stages of the species, that they could not have rested upon the radials as in their younger examples, and that they were parted from the radials by perisome. Upon this proposition we will observe that we have never found among Palaeocrinoids the slightest evidence indicating to us that any of the summit plates were carried inward by perisome. We find that among the Camarata they occupy a comparatively small space, but larger than in the Blastoidea, and that in all cases in which they occur, they are supported by the upward growth of the interradials. In the simpler forms of the Inadunata, when observed, they rest upon a single interradial plate as in the case of the Siluri- an Cyathocrinus alutaceous (Ang.). In the Carboniferous form of Cyathocrinus, in which the ambulacra are placed upon the lateral edges of the interradials, the orals are not carried inward by perisome, but the perisome appears upon the surface of the interra- dial plates. That the ventral plates were not preserved in the so- called adult specimens of Allagecrinus is no proof that they did not exist, or that they were carried inward. The simple fact that the radials underwent the change from the horse-shoe form to a higher state of development, having strongly marked articular facets, ex- tending to the whole width of the plates, is sufficient to explain why the interradials were not intact or reduced in the adult stages. We 112 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. need only refer to the parallel cases of Cyathocrinidae and Poterio- crinidae. In the former, in which the articular facets were com- paratively undeveloped, we have been able, in a number of instances, to observe ventrally the interradial plates, which Etheridge and Carpenter formerly regarded as structually identical with the so- called orals of Allagecrinus. While in the Poteriocrinidae, in which the articular facets are highly developed, no trace of these plates has ever been found. We, of course, do not claim that this is positive proof, that in Allagecrinus these plates were not carried inward by perisome, but it militates strongly against the probability of such a thing, while the theory that they were is at best but the merest conjecture. If Etheridge and Carpenter had placed Allagecrinus and Haplo- crinus among the Neocrinoidea as larval forms, they might be much better warranted in supposing that the plates in question were orals, and were afterwards carried inward, but both forms have been re- ferred by them to the Palaeocrinoidea, in which that mode of devel- opment is altogether unknown. The case of Cyathocrinus shows clearly that in the later types of the Inadunata the conditions of the Palaeocrinoidea remain unchanged. The summit plates are not carried inward by perisome, but occupy the same space as in the earlier forms, and the perisome is formed upon the outer surface of the interradials, (Revision, Pt. III, Pl. IV, Figs, 2, 3, 6.) We should like to know upon what ground the authors maintain that those genera are Palaeocrinoids, when they interpret their structures according to the rules characteristic of the Neocrinoidea. They neither have an anal plate, nor does Allagecrinus show any such irregularity in the arrangement of its plates, as would of itself warrant a reference to the Palaeocrinoids. The only irregularity noticed in Allagecrinus is that the radials in some specimens may be axillary in one to four of the rays, or not axillary in any of them, and upon this character, curiously enough, Etheridge and Carpenter seem to have separated Adlagecrinus from the Haplocri- nidae and made it the type of a distinct family. On this alone it appears they divide it from the Neocrinoidea, as if it were one of the most constant characters among the Palaeocrinoids; while in fact this peculiarity is found only in the Catillocrinidae, in two of the rays of Tribrachiocrinus, and occasionally in Allagecrinus. A char- acter like this is liable to be discovered exceptionally in any new form of Neocrinoids, just as well as among Palaeocrinoids, while among * 1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 113 the latter we find a number of genera, in which the arrangement of of the dorsal cup is altogether symmetrical. It will not, of course, be inferred from the foregoing remarks that we think Allagecrinus and Haplocrinus belong to the Neocrinoidea, but simply that, if Messrs. Etheridge and Carpenter’s arguments are valid, they necessarily lead to that conclusion. We think, on the contrary, there are the strongest reasons for considering them both to be Palaeocrinoids, and that there is no difficulty in discover- ing entire conformity in their morphological conditions with other Palaeocrinoids. Whatever arguments Messrs. Etheridge and Carpenter may here- after offer in favor of their oral theory, it seems to us, they will have to explain upon palaeontological grounds how the five large ventral plates of Allagecrinus and Haplocrinus which cover the whole ven- tral surface happen to occupy in all higher or more advanced forms a comparatively small space around the peristome. They will have to point out by what process the five plates, without coming in con- tact with the anus, were transformed into six pieces or more ; and they will have to furnish better proof as to the existence of a so-called “orocentral,” or they will have to modify their generalizations, which are based almost exclusively upon this highly hypothetical plate. EXPLANATIONS OF FIGURES, PLATE IV. (The followiag letters are employed throughout the figures). 0, Oral plate or oral pyramid; p, proximals; i, interradials; ia, interaxillaries; r, radials; a, anal plate; x,anus, g, grooves. Fig. 1. Oral pyramid and surrounding plates of Sphaeronites glo- bosus (after Angelin, Icon. Crin. Suec. Tab. XI, Fig. 14.) 2. Ventral aspect of Cyathocrinus Gilesi. 3. The same of Stephanocrinus angulatus. 4. The same of Haplocrinus mespiliformis. 5. Profile view of the same species. 6. Ventral aspect of Caryocrinus ornatus (after Hall, Palaeont. N. York, Vol. II, Pl. 41a, Fig. le). 7. The ventral plates of Caryocrinus from near Louisville, Ky. (The course of the subtegminal ambulacral tubes in- dicated upon the surface of the plates). 8. Thesame of Juglandocrinus crassus (after von Koenen, Jahrb. Miner. Bd. II, Taf. IX, Fig. 3.). 9. Ventral covering of a new Talarocrinus from Kentucky ; | the peristomial area closed by a large central plate with- out the aid of proximals. 114 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. 10. The summit plates of Elaeacrinus Verneuili (after Eth. and Carp., Blast. Catal. Pl. X VIII, Fig. 16). 11. The same of Elaeacrinus elegans (from Hall’s type in the National Museum of New York.) 12-14. The same of Elaeacrinus obovatus, as seen in different speci- mens. Fig. 12, all the sutures visible. Fig. 13, the suture between central piece and smaller proximals obliterated. Fig. 14, also those toward the small anal plate obliterated. 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 115 APRIL 5. Rev. Henry C. McCook, D. D. in the chair. Forty-four persons present. Papers under the following titles were presented for publication:— “The Terrestrial Mollusca inhabiting the Samoa or Navigator Islands.” By Andrew Garrett. “Notes on Fresh-water Rhizopods of Swatow, China.” By Adele M. Fielde. Note on the Multiplication of Distoma.—A note was read from Miss ADELE M. Frev_pr, dated Swatow, China, Feb., 1887, to the effect that Distoma infests a species of snail found in many of the pools and wells near Swatow which is eaten, boiled, by the Chinese, and which is fed raw to ducks and geese. On dissecting, recently, an apparently healthy specimen, having a shell an inch long, she had found its liver almost wholly replaced by a Redia, the parent of the Cercaria, which being passively transferred to the alimentary canal of a vertebrate, develops into the Distoma. The life history of this trematode, as worked out by A. P. Thomas, is given in the Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 1883, pp. 99-133, and Limneus is mentioned as its host. The Rediw seen in the snails were of an orange yellow color and the largest were one-tenth of an inch in length. There were counted two hundred and fifty-three that were large enough to be easily isolated by the use of a needle point under the naked eye; and scores more, of smaller size and paler yellow, were visible under a lens. On opening several of the larger Rediw, whose mus- cular mouths were active; they were found each to contain from eighteen to twenty-six Cercarie, strong enough to whirl their tails vigorously, beside many embryos less fully developed. The Cer- carte moved rapidly over a glass slide by the use of their two suckers ; and, merged in water, retained their vitality for thirty hours after being removed from the snail and the Redia. The one snail must have been the host of at least ten thousand larval Distomas. APRIL 12. Mr. CHarues P. Perrot in the chair. Thirty-one persons present. The Placentation of the Two-toed Ant-eater, Cycloturus didactylus. —Prof. J. A. RypeR remarked that some months since Mr. J. W. 116 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [ 1887. Scollick kindly placed in his hands an example of the uterus, con- taining a perfect foetus of this interesting little arboreal South American Ant-eater. The only description of the foetus and mem- branes of this animal which the speaker had been able to find, was by Mayer, in his Analecta, while Milne-Edwards has figured and described the foetus and membranes of the allied form, Tamandua, in the “Annales des Sciences Naturelles.” The almost globular uterus, containing a well-developed foetus, in the specimen exhibited at the meeting of the Academy, was about one inch in diameter. The placenta was relatively large, dome- shaped, or in the form of a disk, seven-eighths of an inch in diame- ter, much thickened in the center and becoming abruptly thin at its margin. Its outer or maternal surface was very convex and its inner or foetal surface distinctly concave. The rather short, stout umbilical cord was attached at about the center of the disk and to its inner surface. The placental disk when carefully inspected upon its inner surface was found to be distinctly lobulated, some- what as in the Sloths, as described by Sir Wm. Turner. The fissures which divided the placental disk were especially conspicuous when the edges of the disk were slightly bent by the fingers towards the convex side. The uterine cornua were short, and the uterus was simple as in man and the sloths; the oviducts apparently quite small; the ovaries of strikingly unequal dimensions on opposite sides. No portion of the uterus was exserted or projected into the vagina as in man, but the walls of the vagina passed directly into those of the uterus. The vaginal mucous membrane was, however, deeply plicated in a longitudinal direction, these plications extending slightly into the cavity of the uterus. The vessels of the cord are subdivided at their insertion into the placental disk ; arterial and venous branches going to and from the several placental lobes, of which there were five, which could be distinctly made out. On the inner surface of the uterine walls, there were apparently adherent portions of the foetal and maternal tissues of the placenta, showing that this type is in all probability more or less deciduate, notwithstanding the fact that the uterine walls are relatively quite thin. The area embraced by the true chorion or placenta covered very nearly one-half of the inner surface of the globularly distended uterus. The false chorion made up the other half of the membran- ous investment of the foetus and was quite thin and translucent. It covered with its outer surface about half of the inside of the uterus, or that hemisphere of the latter at the pole of which the vagina opened from without. The foetus itself was well advanced, having as yet no outward hairy coat, nor could any traces of hair follicles be noted in the skin. No epitrichium was observed, though this may be devel- oped at a later period, or after the hair is erupted from the folli- cles. The total length of the foetus was nearly or quite three inches, of which the long stout tail formed more than a third. 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 117 The speaker then contrasted the various types of placentation, pointing out that it was largely a matter of how the blastodermic vesicle was primarily brought into relation with the walls of the uterus. Ifthe foetation occurred in the bicorned or tubular type of uterus there was an obvious tendency toward the diffuse or zonary type of placenta, as shown in Ungulates and Carnivora, and in those uniparous forms in which the foetus occupies mainly one horn of the uterus, and in which there are bare poles to the chorion and a bare spot where the latter comes in contact with the os uterus as in the Mare and Dugong. Here, the mere mechanical relations of the fcetal and maternal surfaces obviously had had an influence in determining the form of the placenta. The zonary placenta was also imitated in Arthropods (Peripatus) in virtue of the existence of such similar conditions in both the latter and Carnivorous Mammalia. The speaker thought that all attempts to use the pla- centa as a means of clearly distinguishing the various orders of mammalia or of subdividing the latter into sub-classes would, in the course of further embryological research, be shown to be not well founded. This seemed all the more probable since the rationalé of the so-called “inversion” of the germinal rays of Rodentia was better understood. As a result of fuller knowledge it is hardly conceivable that a zonary placenta could be found in those types, notwithstanding the fact that they at first seem to present the same type of condition for the blastodermic vesicle in the uterine cornua as do the Carnivora. But now that we know that some of the Insectivora (Talpa) tend in the same direction the anomalies which are presented by Insectivora and Rodentia become explain- able and lead us up to the view that, it depends (1) upon the mode in which the early development is modified, and (2) upon the man- ner in which the foetus is related to the maternal surfaces, whether the diffuse, zonary or discoidal form of placenta will be assumed. In the case of the Sloths and Ant-eaters, of South America, the uterus has attained a remarkable degree of specialization, so as to ereatly resemble the simple uterus of the higher Primates, and in this case again, the relationship between the form of the uterine cavity and that of the placenta seems obvious, for in the sloths, ant-eaters and higher primates, the placenta is essentially discoidal and deciduate. In the sloth, however, Turner has shown the discoidal placenta to be made up of separable lobes; these may be conceived as representing the cotyledons of Ungulates, or groups of tufts in the diffuse type of placenta, which have been crowded together as the uterine cornua became shortened on the mesometric side, in the transition from the bifid to the simple type of uterus. Some further ground for this view of the origin of the lobulated discoidal, dome-shaped placenta of the sloths is supplied by the fact that in Manis, or the scaly Ant-eater of the Old World, the placenta is diffuse and non-deciduate. In some of the Armadilloes the placenta is transversely oblong, and this again is a fact favorable to the preceding view. 118 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. In like manner, the terms “ deciduate” and “non-deciduate” do not serve to sharply mark off groups from each other, but probably rest for their distinction upon the more or less intimate and complex interlocking of the foetal and maternal membranes during their functional activity. So that in this case again we are dealing with structures and structural conditions differing only in degree but not in kind. The extra thickening of the decidua or uterine mucosa in the extremest type of deciduate placenta, may be regarded as cor- related with the restriction, concentration or reduction of the placental area and the formation of a decidua serotina. Finally, it is proper to call attention to the fact that the American Edentata are more specialized as respects their placentation than those of the Old World. The American forms, further, generally agree amongst themselves, except that in the Armadilloes, Milne-Edwards, Kolliker and Von Jhering have observed that, in some species, there may be a number of foetuses invested by a common chorion, on which account, the latter author has supposed that such a com- pound embryo is the result of the fragmentation or subdivision of a single egg, a phenomenon of metagenesis to which he has applied 55? the appropriate term Temnogeny. Sugar in China—At the recent meeting of the Botanical Section, Mr. Tuomas MEEHAN read the following extract from a letter of Miss Adele M. Fielde, a missionary in China. The letter is dated from Swatow. “My attention has lately been called to an error, existing apparently in many minds, concerning the plant from which sugar is made in China. pl. 12, fig. 11. Abundant beneath decaying leaves in forests at Upolu. This species is of a depressed turbinate form, with a moderate umbilicus, 53 convex whorls, the last one angulated and the color variable: fulvous, chestnut, corneous, luteous, unicolor or with two chestnut bands one above and one beneath the angulated periphery. Sometimes there is only a single spiral line on the upper surface. Diam. 18 to 20 mill. T. tuber, Mousson. Trochomorpha tuber, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 334, pl. 14, fig. 5, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 474. Helix tuber, Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 95, Pfeiffer, Mus. Hel., vii, p. 278. The habitat and station is the same as the preceding species but is much more rare. This rather small species may be characterized by its obtuse coni- cal form, perforated base, yellowish horn color and two narrow chestnut bands, one above the other beneath the periphery. Whorls 5%, convexly-rounded and the last one very slightly angulated. Diam. 12, height 9 mill. T. subtrochiformis, Mousson. Helix trochiformis, Gould (not of a Exp. Exp. Shells, p. 61. Helix Eurydice, Mousson (not of Gould), Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 170. Trochomorpha sub-trochiformis, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p-. 335, pl. 4, fig. 6; 1870, var. albo-striata, p. 122. Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc. 1871, p. 474. Helix sub-trochiformis, Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 95. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., vii, p. 289. 128 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. Abundant at Upolu and Savaii. A depressed pyramidal species with a moderate umbilicus, rounded apex and 53 slightly convex whorls, the last one acutely and com- pressly keeled. The rude and irregular strie of growth resemble interrupted pale scratches. Color luteous, or straw-yellow with a dorsal and basal reddish-chestnut band. Diam. 17 mill. ° Prof. Mousson has described a variety from Kanathia, one of the Viti Islands, under the name albo-striata. It is probably a distinct species. T, tentoriolum, Gould. Helix tentoriolum, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1846, p. 176; Exp. Exp. Shells, p. 63, fig. 53. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., p. 119. Trochomorpha tentoriolum, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 339. Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 474. Dr. Gould who described this species from examples collected by the United States Exploring Expedition cites “Upolu” as its hab- itat. As it has not been noticed by subsequent explorers its exist- ence in that group certainly needs confirmation. It is a small, trochiform pale greenish species with rounded apex and 6 flattened whorls which are beautifully striated and the last one acutely carinated. Diam. 9, height 7 mill. T. navigatorum, Pfeiffer. Helix navigatorum, Pfeiffer, Proc. Zeol. Soc., 1854, p. 55; Mon. Hel., iv, p. 114; (Videna) Vers., p, 182. Reeve, Conch. Icon., no, 1303, pl. 187. Trochomorpha navigatorum, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 474. Dr. Pfeiffer described this species from specimens in the Cuming- ian Collection which were labelled “Navigator Islands.” Like the preceding species the above habitat is questionable. Pfeiffer says it isa moderately umbilicated, solid, lentiform species of a purplish-brown, or reddish-grey color, with an obtuse, convex spire, marginated suture and 6 slightly convex whorls, the last one compressly carinated, Diam. 182, height 72 mill. T. luteo-cornea, Pfeiffer. Helix luteo-cornea, Pfeiffer, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1854, p. 56; Mon. Hel., iv, p. 186, (Videna) Vers., p. 182. Reeve, Conch. Icon., no. 1287, pl. 186. This, like the preceding species, is described from specimens in 1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 129 Cuming’s Collection, labelled “Navigator Islands.” It has not been identified by either Prof. Mousson or myself. The description refers to a solid, lenticular, conoidal luteous-horn colored species with a moderately sized umbilicus and five regular striz. Whorls 5, convex, the last one angulated. T. Samoa, Hombron and Jacquinot. Helix Samoa, Hom. et Jacq., Voy. Pol Sud., Zool., v, p. 11, pl. 4, figs. 28-31. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., iv, p. 69. Helicopsis, Samoa, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soe., 1871, p. 475. This species which has not been identified since the above nat- uralists published their description, may possibly be a form of Gould’s Troilus. They give the habitat “Upoulon”= Upolu. They describe it as having a medium sized umbilicus, conoidal form, rather fine striae, luteous color with two fuscous lines, and. 5% whorls, the last one subangular; base convex, aperture lunate and the peristome simple. Diam. 18, height 10 mill. PATULA, Held. P. gradata, Gould. ; Helix gradata, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1846, p. 172 ; Exp. Exp. Shells, p. 49, fig. 48. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., i, p. 104. (Charopa) Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 90. Discus gradatus, H. and A. Adams, Gen. Moll., ii, p. 117. Patula gradata, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 168; 1869, p. 3383; 1871, p. 12. Pitys gradata, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 474. Common beneath decaying vegetation and is probably distributed throughout the group. It is common also to the Tonga Islands. A small, orbicular, depressed, widely umbilicated species with 5 convex whorls, the last one subangulated on the margin of the broad umbilicus and the delicate strize of growth are cancellated by five revolving impressed lines. Aperture sub-orbicular, color pale oliva- ceous with radiating rufous spots. Diam. 6 mill. P. complementaria. Mousson. Patula complementaria, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 168, pl. 14, figs. 5, 1869, p. 353. Helix complementaria, Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., v, p. 157. (Patula) Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 89. 130 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887- Pitys complementaria, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 474. A rare species found beneath rotten wood and under decaying leaves in the forests back of Apia village, Upolu. It is a little smaller than gradata and the umbilicus is only mod- erately open. The spire is depressed, suture deep, whorls 5, with transverse, crowded, sharp rib-like striz. Color corneous, tessellated and radiately striped with chestnut. P. allecta, Cox. Helix allecta, Cox, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1870, p. 81. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., vii, p. 162. 5 Iam unacquainted with this species which was found at Upolu. Dr. Cox says it is a minute, depressed, orbicular reddish-chestnut species, with closely-set strong strixe, 42 to 5 convex whorls, deep suture and the broad umbilicus is saucer shaped. PITYS, Beck. P. hystricelloides, Mousson. Patula hystricelloides, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 169, pl. 14, fig. 6. (Endodonta) 1869, p. 331. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 93. Helix hystricelloides, Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., v, p. 221. (Patula) Pae- tel, Cat. Conch., p. 91. Pitys hystricelloides, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 474. Not uncommon under rotten wood and beneath decaying leaves. Upolu. This species may be determined by its depressed rounded form, curved costulate strize, depressed spire, 53 whorls, and more partic- ularly by the numerous laminz in the aperture, of which there are from 3 to 4 on the parietal region and 6 to 8 in the palate. The umbilicus is about one-fifth the diameter of the shell. Diam. 42 mill, P. Graeffei, Mousson. Patula (Endodonta) Graeffei, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 332, pl. 14, fig. 3. Helix Graffei, Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., vii, p. 258. Pitys Graffei, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 474. I am not acquainted with this species which was found at Upolu by Dr. Graffe. 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 131 It is a little larger than the preceding species, with a more open umbilicus, 5 whorls, and 2 laminz on the parietal wall and 5 in the palate. “Diam. 5-2 mill. STENOGYRA, Shuttleworth. S$. Tuckeri, Pfeiffer. Bulimus Tuckeri, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1846, p. 30; Mon. Hel., ii, p. 158; (Opeas) Vers., p. 156, Reeve, Conch. Icon., pl. 68, sp. 481. ( Opeas). Cox, Mon. Aust. Land Shells, p. 69, pl. 13, fig. 9, Brazier, Quar. Jour. Conch., i, p. 272. Stenogyra Tuckeri, Albers, Die Hel., ed. 2d. p. 265. (Opeas) Frauenfeld, Verh. Zool Bot. Wien, xix, p. 873. Pease. Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 473. Garrett, Jour. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 1881, p. 393, 1885, p. 43. Bulimus junceus, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1846, p. 191; Exp. Exp. Shells, p. 76, fig. 87. Pfeiffer, Mus. Hel., ii, p. 220. Stenogyra juncea, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 340. Pease Jour. de Conch., 1871, p. 95; Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 473. ( Opeas) Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 104. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 90. Garrett, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 1879, p. 19. Bulimus Walli, Cox, Cat. Aust. Land Shells, p. 24. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., vi, p. 99. Stenogyra Upolensis, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 175. ( Obeliscus) Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 104. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., lv, p, 29. Bulimus Upolensis, Pfeiffer. Mon. Hel., iv, p. 100. Bulimus Panayensis, Pfeiffer, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1846, p. 33; Mon. Hel., ii, p. 156; (Opeas) Vers., p. 156. Reeve, Conch. Icon., pl. 14, no. 76. (Opeas) Albers, Die Hel., p. 175. Subulina Panayensis, H. and A. Adams, Gen. Moll. ii, p. iii. Semper, Phil. Land-Moll., ii, p. 137, pl. 8, fig. 15. Stenogyra Panayensis, (Opeas), Albers, Die Hel., ed. 2d., p. 265. Martens, Ostas. Zool., ii, p. 83, (Siam), 376, pl. 22, fig. 8. (Opeas) Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 104. Bulimus diaphanus, Gassies (not of Pfeiffer), Jour. de Conch., 1859, p. 370. ~Bulimus Souverbianus, Gassies, Faune Nouv. Caled., p. 52, pl. 2, fig. 5. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., vi., p. 98. Bulimus Artensis, Gassies, Jour. de Conch., 1866, p. 50. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel. vi, p. 98. 132 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. Stenogyra novemgyrata, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1870, p. 126. (Subulina), Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 104. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeft., Wy Pao: Bulimus novemgyratus, Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., viii, p. 138. Stenogyra gyrata, Mousson MS., in Mus. Godeffroy, 1885. This species, which is distributed over a larger geographical area than any other species of land-shell, is diffused throughout all parts of Polynesia, the low coral islands as well as the more elevated groups, and ranges throughout Melanesia, Micronesia, Australasia, Moluccas, Philippines, Guam, Ceylon, Siam, Cochin China, China, and probably extends its range as far as the East coast of Africa. Since the publication of my paper on the Society Island land- shells I have received from Mr. E. L. Layard, examples of Bulimus Soweérbianus and B. Artensis,both of which are identical with Poly- nesian specimens of S. Tuckert. Through the kindness of Dr. Hungerford, of Hong Kong, I have been enabled to compare Pfeiffer’s Bulimus Panayensis with B. Tuckert and cannot detect a single character to separate the two species. I am strongly inclined to believe that the West Indian Stenogyra subula, Pfr., is a form of the Polynesian S. Tuckeri, and was acci- dentally imported with the Tahitian bread-fruit plants nearly 100 yearsago. M. M. Crosse and Fischer (Jour. de Conch., 1863, p. 361), record the West Indian Bulimus subula from Cochin China, and give a good figure of the same, which is, undoubtedly, the ubiquitous S. Tuckeri. I reproduce their remarks as follows :— “Cette espéce provient de Saigon et de Fuyen-Moth, ot elle a été recueillie, par M. Michau, dans les fossés, dans la terre et sous les herbes. IL peut sembler trés-extraordinaire de retrouver en Cochin- chine une espéce des Antilles, qui n’ a guére été signalée jusqu’ ici qua Cuba, 4 la Jamaique et a Saint-Thomas. Pour ne conserver aucun doute 4 son égard, nous avons cru devoir soumettre un indi- vidu authentique 4 l’ examen de M. Pfeiffer, qui a créé l espéce. Il faut done accepter le fait, qui peut étre, au reste, seulement un accident d’ acclimatation: la petitesse et la légéreté de la coquille en question rendent cette supposition vraisemblable.” I have lately received from Dr. Hungerford, several examples of Stenogyras, labelled “ Opeas subulata Pfr. Hong Kong” which differed none from the Polynesian S. Tuckert. 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 133 This species, which is chiefly confined to the low-lands near the sea-shore, is found beneath decaying vegetation and under loose stones. It may be easily recognized by its small size, subcylindri- eal form, thin texture and pale horn color. The animal is pale yellow. PARTULA, Ferussac. P. Actor, Albers. Partulus actor, Albers, Die Hel., p. 187. Partula actor, Chem, ed. 2d., pl. 48, figs. 138, 14. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., iii, p. 450. Hartman, Cat. Part., p. 12; Obs. Gen. Part. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., p. 179; Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 1885, p. 220. Partula Recluziana, Petit, Jour. de Conch., 1850, p. 170,-pl. 7, fig. 5. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., ili, p. 452. Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 339. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 104. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff, v, p. 91. Partula zebrina, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1848. p. 196 ; Exp. Exp. Shells, p. 82, fig. 89. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., iii., p. 450. This species, which is unknown to me, inhabits Tutuila. It may be distinguished by its ovate-conical form, whitish or pale fulvous color, ornamented with more or less flexuous paler lines. Length 19 mill. P. expansa, Pease. Partula expansa, Pease, Amer. Jour. Conch., 1871, p. 26, pl. 9, fig. 3; Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 473 (eatensa in err.). Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., viii, p. 203. Hartman. Cat. Part., p. 138; Obs. Gen. Part., Bul. Mus. Comp. Zool., p. 182; Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 1885, p. 212. Partula zebrina, Mousson (not of Gould), Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 173, 1869, p. 339. This charming species, which is not uncommon on foliage at Upolu, may be distinguished by its white color and spiral opaque-white interrupted lines. The spire is moderately produced, the last whorl ventricose, obliquely produced and the base exhibits a large umbili- cus. The peristome is broadly and flatly expanded. Length 19 mill, Mr. Pease, on the authority of Mr. Brazier cites Tutuila as its habitat. 134 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF - [1887. P. canalis, Mousson. Partula canalis, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 172; 1869, p. 337 (var. semilineata). Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., vi, p. 155. Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 473. Paetel, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 91, Partula Bulimoides, Hartman (not of Lesson), Cat. Gen. Part., pp-, 12, 13 with wood cut; Obs. Gen. Part. Mus. Comp. Zool., p. 180. Partula cornica, Gould (part), Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1847, p- 196. Hartman, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 1885, p. 222. Not infrequent on foliage at Upolu. The variety was found by Dr. Griiffe at Tutuila. A fine large sinistral species, 29 mill. long. elongate conical in shape, of a fulvous-brown color with darker tinted spire. Aperture large’; peristome whitish, broadly expanded, slightly reflexed and a deep transverse sulcation marks the upper part of the columella lip. The fine spiral incised lines which are very distinct on the whole surface of P. conica are only visible on the boundaries of the open umbilicus and on the apical whorls. P. abbreviata, Mousson. Partula abbreviata, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 339, pl. 14, fig. 7. Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p.473. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 104. Schmeltz Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 91. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., viii, p. 200. Hartman, Cat. Gen. Part., p. 13; Obs. Gen. Part., Bul. Mus. Comp. Zool., p. 179. This fine species which is unknown to me was found at Tutuila by Dr. Grafte. An ovate, thin, pale horn colored species closely allied to but much more abbreviated than P. conica. Prof. Mousson says it is intermediate between the latter species and P. canalis. Length 21 mill. P. conica, Gould. Partula conica, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1847, p. 196 ; Expl. Exp. Shells, p. 81. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., iii, p. 445. Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 171. Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 473. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 104. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 91. Hartman, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 1885, p. 222. Partula Upolensis, “Mousson” Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., no. 1. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 104. 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 135 Partula Bulimoides, Hartman (not of Lesson), Cat. Gen. Part. p. 12; Obs. Gen. Part. Bul. Mus. Comp. Zool., p. 108. Not uncommon on foliage at Upolu and Tutuila. A dextral oblong-conical, luteous-horn colored species, smaller than the sinistral P. canalis, with five convex whorls and rather large aperture. Lip white and broadly expanded. Length 23 to 24 mill. P. Brazieri, Pease. Partula Brazieri, Pease, Amer. Jour. Conch., 1871, p. 27, pl. 9, fig. 5; Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 473. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel. viii, p. 194. “Tutuila” (Brazier). Mr. Pease received a single example of this species from Mr. Brazier who says it was the only specimen found at the above men- tioned locality. Dr. Hartman, who has examined the type specimen in the Mu- seum of the Philadelphia Academy, refers it to the synonomy of P. Caledonica « New Hebrides species. Judging from the figure of Braziert it certainly has a strong resemblance to the New Hebrides Partula. J doubt it having been obtained at Tutuila. TORNATELLINA, Beck. T. oblonga, Pease. Tornatellina oblonga, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1864, p. 673 ; 1871, p. 473; Jour. de Conch., 1871, p. 93. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., vi, p. 264. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 89. Garrett, Proc. Phil. Acad. Nat. Sci., 1879, p. 21; Jour. Phil. Acad. Nat. Sci., 1881, p, 398. Tornatellina bacillaris, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1871, p. 16, pl. 3, fig. 5. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, pp. 89, 90. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel. viii, p. 316. Stenogyra (Subulina) bacillaris, Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 104. Inhabits all the groups from the Paumotu to the Viti Islands, and was found by Dr. Graffe on the low coral islands of the Ellice’s group in “Central Pacific.” On the ground in forests. This species may be distinguished by its imperforated base, slen- der form, thin pellucid texture, fuscous-horn color, 6 whorls, and nearly vertical simple columella. Length 42 mill. 136 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [ 1887. 'T. conica, Mousson. Tornatellina conica, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 342, pl. 14, fig. 8; 1871 (var. impressa), p. 16. Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1861, p. 473. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., viii, p. 316. Garrett, Proc. Phil. Acad. Nat. Sci., 1879, p. 21; Jour. Phil. Acad. Nat. Sci., 1881, p.. 399 ; 1884, p. 81, Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 89. Cionella conica, Paetel, Cat. Conch. p. 116. Has the same range and station as the preceding species. It is more robust and lighter colored than oblonga, the spire more tapering, body-whorl larger, more compressed, parietal laminze more prominent and the columella more twisted than in that species. SUCCINEA, Draparnaud. §, putamen, Gould. Succinea putamen, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1846, p. 183; Exp. Exp. Shells, p. 13, fig. 16. Pfeiffer, Mus. Hel., ii, p. 522. Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 174; (Amphibulima) 1869, p. 343. Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 472. (Amphib- ulima) Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 118. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p- 89. Omalonyx putamen, H.and A. Adams, Gen. Moll., ii, p. 181. Common on foliage at Upolu. This fine large species may be distinguished by its depressed ovate form, thin texture, fulvous-horn color, very short spire, 12 whorls, the last one with irregular, interrupted impressed strize. Aperture very large, roundly-ovate, and the columella subplicated. Length 17, Diam. 123 mill. §. crocata,Gould. Succinea crocata, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1846, p. 183; Exp. Exp. Shells, p. 28, fig. 21. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., ii, p. 520. Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 174; (Amphibulima) 1869, p. 843. H. and A. Adams, Gen. Moll., ii, p. 128. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 118. Pease, Proce. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 472. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff.,v, p. 89. Abundant at Upolu. A large species of a rather thin texture, ovate-globose form, ful- vous-horn color, 2} whorls, the last one very large, usually with revolving impressed lines. Spire short. Length 19, diam. 13 mill. 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 137 S$. modesta, Gould. Succinea modesta, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1846, p. 186; Exp. Exp. Shells, p. 23, fig. 24. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., ii, p. 521, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 174; (Amphibulima) 1869, p. 343. H. and A. Adams, Gen. Moll., ii, p. 129. Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 472. (Brachyspira) Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 113. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 89 Succinea Cheynei, Dohrn, MS. I found this species abundant on the ground in a forest at Upolu. Its small size (9 mill. long), ovate form, thin texture, luteous- horn color, moderate spire, and 3 whorls will readily distinguish it. S. Manua, Gould. Succinea Manua, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1846, p. 185 ; Exp. Exp. Shells, p. 25, fig. 23. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., ii, p. 520. H. and A. Adams, Gen. Moll., ii, p. 129. Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p- 472. Said to inhabit Manua Island. Gould says it is a small, ovate, ventricose, thin, straw-colored species, with an obtuse spire, 2} whorls, deep suture and marked by longitudinal striz and transverse rugosities. Length 10 mill. VERTIGO, Miiller. V. pediculus, Shuttleworth. Pupa pediculus, Shuttleworth, Bern. Mitth. 1852, p. 296. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., iii, p.557. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v. 89. Mousson (var. Samoensis), Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 175. Vertigo pediculus, Pfeiffer, Vers., p. 177. (Alea) H. and A. Adams, Gen. Moll., ii, p. 172. Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 341. Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, pp. 463, 474. Garrett, Proc. Phil. Acad. Nat. Sci. 1879, p.19; Jour. Phil. Acad. Nat. Sci., 1881, p. 400. : Pupa Samoensis, “Mss.” Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., iv. p. 108. (Sphyradium) Paetel, Cat. Conch. p. 108. Pupa nitens, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1860, p. 439. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., vi, p. 355. . Vertigo nitens, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, pp. 463, 474. Pupa hyalina, “Zelebor,” Pfeiffer. Mon. Hel., vi, p. 329. Vertigo hyalina, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 474. Vertigo nacca, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc., Nat. Hist., 1862, p. 280 ; Otia Conch., p. 237, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, pp. 463, 474. fae nacca, Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., vi, p. 330. 0 158 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. Common to all the Polynesian groups. Its minute size, ovate-oblong shape, hyaline texture, obtuse spire, rounded aperture, and the thin slightly expanded lip will readily distinguish it. There are usually 5 denticles in the aperture. V. tantilla, Gould. Pupa (Vertigo) tantilla, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1847, p. 197, Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., iii, p. 557. (Vertigo) Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1870, p. 127. (Vertigo) Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., iv, p. 69. (Pupinella) Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 108. Vertigo tantilla, Gould, Exp. Exp. Shells, p. 92, fig. 103. (Alea) H. and A. Adams, Gen. Moll. iii, p. 172. Pease. Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, pp. 460, 463, 474. Garrett, Jour. Phil. Acad. Nat. Sci., 1881, p. 400. Pupa pleurophora, Shuttleworth, Bern. Mittheil., 1852, p. 296. Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., iii, p. 560. Vertigo pleurophora, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 474. Pupa Dunkeri, “Zelebor” Pfeitter, Mon. Hel., vi, p. 333. Vertigo Dunkeri, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 474. Vertigo armata, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, pp. 461, 474. Pupa armata, Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., viii, p. 407. Vertigo dentifera, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, pp. 462, 474. Pupa dentifera, Pfeiffer, Mon. Hel., viii, p. 408. Ranges from the Society to the Viti Islands. This and the pre- ceeding species are found beneath rotten wood, under stones and amongst decaying leaves. In shape it varies from an abbreviate-ovate to oblong-oval, and they vary to a greater or less degree in the relative proportion of the whorls. Color pale corneous under a brownish more or less distinctly shagreened epidermis, which in perfect examples is fur- nished with oblique membranous riblets. The last whorl behind the peristome is frequently bisulcate. MELAMPUS, Montfort. M. luteus, Quoy and Gaimard. Auricula lutea, Quoy and Gaimard, Voy. Astrol., i, p. 163, pl. 6, figs. 25-27. Deshayes, Lam. Hist., viii. p. 338. Kuster, Auric., p. 39, pl. 6, figs. 1-3. Mousson, Jay. Moll.. p. 47, pl. 5, fig. 6. Conovulus luteus, Anton, Verz., p. 48. Melampus luteus, Beck, Ind., p. 106. M. E. Gray, Figs. Moll. Anim., pl. 306, fig. 5, H. and A. Adams, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1854, p. 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PH{LADELPHIA. 139 10; Gen. Moll., ii, p. 243. Pfeiffer, Syn. Auric., no. 30;.Mon. Auric. i, p. 36. Mérch, Cat. Yold., p. 38. Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 346. Martens and Langk. Don. Bism., p. 55. Gassies, Faun. Nouv. Caled., p. 62. Pease, Jour. de Conch., 1871, p. 93; Proce. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 477. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 114. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff, v, p. 88. Garrett, Proc. Phil. Acad. Nat. Sci., fe p- 28. Jour. Phil. Acad. Nat. Sci., 1881, p. 402. Abundant just above high-w ae mark and ranges from the ;ambier Islands to the East Indies. This species may be easily recognized by its large size (18 mill.) and uniform luteous color. M. fasciatus, Deshayes. Auricula fasciata, Deshayes, Encycl. Meth., ii, p. 90; Lam. Hist., vill, p. 3387. Kuster, Auric., pl. a, figs. 2, 3. Mousson, Jav. Moll, p. 46, pl. 5, figs. 28-29. + Melampus fasciatus, Beck, Ind. Moll, p. 107. (ralia) H. and A. Adams, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1854, p. ii. Pfeiffer, Syn. Auric., no. 33; Mon. Auric., i, p. 38. Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 348. Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 477. Martens and Langk., Don. Bism., p. 55. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 114. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 88. Garrett, Jour. Phil. Acad. Nat. Sci., 1881, p. 402. Conovulus fasciatus, ‘Griffith, Cuy. Anim. King., pl. 27, fig. 13. Anton, Verz., pl. 48. Guerin, Icon. Moll. pl. 17, pl. 7, fig. 8. Tralia (Pira) fasciata, H. and A. Adams, Gen. Moll., ii, p. 240. Auricula trifasciuta, Kuster, Auric., p. 38, pl. 5, figs. 15-17. Melampus trifasciatus, Pfeiffer, Syn. Aurica., no. 38; Mon. Auric., i, p. 48, H. and A. Adams, Gen. Moll., ii, p. 248. Gassies, Faun. Nouv. Caled., p. 63, Cox, “Exchange List,” p. 33. Brazier, Quar. Jour. Conch., i, p. 274. Auricula monile, Quoy and Gaimard, Voy. Astrol., ii, p. 166, pl. 13, figs. 28-33. Potiez and Michaud, Gal. Douai., i, p. 208. Reeve, Conch. Syst., 11, pl. 187, fig. 8. Cassidula ? monile, M. E. Gray, Figs. Moll. Anim., p. 306, figs. 10- 11. (Ex. Q. and G.) This, like the preceding species lives just above high-water mark and has the same extensive geographical range. It is subject to considerable variation in form, color and fasciation. The type varies from bluish-white to luteous and girdled by four to six narrow chestnut bands. Varieties of a uniform bluish-white, -corneous, brownish or orange-brown are not infrequent, as well as 140 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. one of an orange-brown with three chestnut bands. The spire is marked with minute radiating grooves which are very faintly ex- pressed or very conspicuous, sometimes covering the whole spire or only visible at the apex. Length 11 to 14 mill. M. parvulus, Nuttall. Melampus parvulus, Nuttall, MS., Pfeiffer, Syn. Auric., no. 11; Mon. Auric., p. 24. H. and A. Adams, Gen. Moll., ii, p. 243. Peake: Proce. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 477. Martens and Langk. Don. Bism., p. 56, pl. 3. fig. 10. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 114. Brazier, Quar. Jour. Conch., i, p. 247. Common on the margins of mangrove swamps. Also common in the Tonga and Viti Islands. Mr. Nuttall obtained the type speci- mens at the Sandwich Islands. It not only inhabits New Caledonia but ranges west as far as Torres’ Strait, where it was found by Mr. Brazier. The Samoa specimens which are a little smaller than Nuttall’5 type, differ none from the latter except having one or two more denticles or plicze on the parietal region, and the base is more dis- tinctly, impressly striated, It may be recognized by its ovate shape, smooth shining surface, dark-chestnut, or olive brown color, short convexly conoid spire and mucronated apex. On the lower portion of the parietal region may be observed two approximating folds, the lower one the smaller and occasionally wanting. There are usually one or two small denticles above, and the palate has 5 to 7 lamine. The columellar fold is continuous with the basal portion of the per- istome. Length 7-9 mill. M. Tongaensis, Mousson. Melampus Tongaensis, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1871, p. 22, pl. 3, fig. 8. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 88. Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum. (Auric.), iv, p. 316. A few examples found in the same station as the preceding species. Common also in the Tonga and Viti Islands. Very closely allied to, and perhaps only a form of MZ. parvulus. It is about the same size and color, but is a little more oblong and the spire is more produced. The fold and dentition is the same in the two species. M. semisulcatus, Mousson. Melampus semisulcatus, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 347, pl. 15, fig. 2, Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 114. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., 1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 141 v, p. 88. Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum. (Auric.), iv, p. 318. Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 477. Common on the margins of mangrove swamps. Occurs also in the Tonga and Viti Islands. This species is of an oblong pear-shape, uniform cinnamon color, spire short, usually eroded, spirally grooved, the grooves more or less evanescent on the middle of the body-whorl. There are three folds on the parietal region and usually two laminee in the palate. Length 11 mill. M. striatus, Pease. Melampus striatus, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1861, p. 244; 1871, p. 477. Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum. (Auric.), iv, p. 511. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 88. Melampus Montrouzieri, Souverbie, Jour. de Conch., 1866, p. 148, pl. 6, fig. 1, la. Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum. (Auric.), iv, p. 312. Melampus ornatus, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1871, p. 21, pl. 3, fig. 7. Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum. (Auric.), iv, p. 312. A few examples found on the margins of swamps at Upolu. It also inhabits the Society, Tonga and Viti Islands as well as New Caledonia. It may be distinguished by its oblong-ovate form, brownish-cor- neous, chestnut-brown or greenish-brown color, mucronated spire, 8 whorls, marked by closely-set transverse impressed lines, and the upper half with small longitudinal plications which give that part of the shell a granulated appearance. The transverse lines are frequently evanescent on the middle of the body-whorl. There are from two to three folds on the parietal region, the upper one small and granuliform. There may be observed one to three lamelliform plications in the palate, and, sometimes with several raised white parallel strie. Length 9-10 mill. M. castaneus, Muhlfeld. Voluta castanea, Muhlfeld, Mag. Ges. Nat. Fr. Berl., vii, 1818, p. 4, pl. 1, fig. 2. Auricula castanea, Philippi, Zeits. Malak. 1851, p. 54. Melampus castaneus, Pfeiffer, Mon. Auric., p. 30. Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 349. Prof. Mousson records this species in his Samoan list. It did not occur to my notice. 142 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. LAIMODONTA, Nuttall. L. Layardi, H. and A. Adams. Ophicardelus Layardi (Laimodonta), H. and A: Adams, Proce. Zool. Soc., 1854, p. 35. Laimodonta Layardi, H. and A. Adams, Gen. Moll, ii, p. 246. Melampus Layardi, Pfeiffer, Syn. Auric., no. 48; Mon. Auric., p. 51. Gassies, Faun. Nouv. Caled., p. 61, pl. 7, fig. 7. Tennent’s Cey- lon, i, p. 239. Cox, “Exchange List,” p. 33. H. Nevill, Enum. Hel. ete., Ceylon, 1871, p. 4. Laimodonta conica, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1862, p. 242; Amer. Jour. Conch., 1868, p. 101, pl. 12, fig. 15; Jour. de Conch., 1871, pp- 93, 94. Proc, Zool. Soc., 1871. pp. 470, 477. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 81. Garrett, Jour. Phil. Acad. Nat. Sci., 1881, p. 403. Laemodonta conica, Martens and Langk., Don. Bism., p. 57, pl. 3, fig. 13. Laimodonta Anaaensis, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 63, pl. 5, fig. 1. Plecotrema Anaaensis, Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 114. Melampus conicus, Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum. (Auric.), iv, p. 319. “2” Melampus Anaaensis, Pfeiffer, 1. c., p. 320. A few beach-worn specimens found at Upolu. Ranges from the Paumotu Islands to the East Indies. This species is acuiminately-ovate, rather solid, spirally striated by incised lines, spire rather long, acute; color chestnut-brown, with one or two transverse whitish bands. Parietal region with two plaits, one on the columella and one or two in the palate. Length 6 to 8} mill. CASSIDULA, Ferussae. C. crassiuscula, Mousson. Cassidula crassiuscula, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 345, pl. 15, fig. 1. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 114. Pease, Proc. Zool. Soe., 1871, p. 477. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 88. Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum. (Auric.), iv, p. 392. Auricula (Cassidula) crassiuseula, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1871, p. 191. Cassidula nucleus, Gassies, (Martyn ?), Faun. Nouv. Caled., p. 71, pl. 3, fig. 9. Common on the mud in mangrove swamps, and inhabits the Tonga, Viti and the islands in Melanesia. > 1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA, 143 A thick, broadly ovate, imperforate species, with fine spiral im- pressed strize and short conical spire. Color different shades of chestnut-brown, white, corneous, fulvous, frequently with from one to four transverse bands on the body-whorl, and more rarely with a sutural livid band. Aperture pale fulyous, brownish or white, and the lip light fulvous or white. Length 10 to 16 mill. C. paludosa, Garrett. Ophicardelus paludosus, Garrett, Amer. Jour. Conch., 1872, p. 220, pl. 19, fig. 3. Cassidula paludosa, Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 114. Plecotrema paludosa, Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 87. Melampus paludosus, Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum. (Auric.), iv, p. 527. A few specimens found in mangrove swamps at Upolu. Com- mon in the Viti group. A small, solid, ovate, whitish, yellowish-horn colored, or chestnut- brown species, with fine, spiral, incised punctured lines and carin- ated base. Spire convexly conical and more produced than in the preceding species. Length 8 to 10 mill. PYTHIA, Bolten. P. tortuosa, Mousson. Pythia tortuosa, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1871, p. 19, pl. 3, fig. 6. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 114. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff, v, p. 87. Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum. (Auric.), iv, p. 359. Nevill, List. Moll. Ind. Mus., p. 221. Cox, Proce. Lin. Soc. N.S. W., 1881, p. 618. Common on the margins of mangrove swamps at Upolu. Dr. Grifte collected examples at Futuna and Wallis Island in the northern part of the Tonga group. This species which ranges from 18 to 25 mill. in length, is luteous horn-color, with small irregular chestnut-brown maculations ; some- times uniform chestnut-black or corneous, and the varices are spot- ted with dark chestnut and white. The base is either imperforated or rimate. The aperture is luteous, rarely brownish, and the peri- stome is usually mottled. The columellar fold is generally contin- uous with the basal portion of the peristome, and the lower parietal plait is simple. P. Savaiensis, Mousson. Pythia pantherina, A. Adams, var. Uveana, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 177. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., iii, p. 28. Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 477. Paetal, Cat. Conch., p. 114. Pfeiffer, 144 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [ 1887. Mon. Pneum. (Auric.), iv, p. 348. Cox, Proc. Lin. Soc., N. 8. W., 1881, p. 607. Pythia Savaiensis, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 345; 1870, p. 135. Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 477. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 87. Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum. (Auric.), iv, p. 341. Cox. Proc. Lin. Soe. N.S. W., 1881, p. 613. Nevill, List, Moll. Ind. Mus. p. 223. This species was found at Savaii by Dr. Graffe. I gathered numerous examples at Wallis Island and in the Viti group. In forests near the sea-shore. A solid, ovate, umbilicated (rarely imperforate), species 21 to 28 mill. long, of a corneous or yellowish-horn color, mottled with chest- nut, rarely uniform light or dark chestnut and the varices spotted with white. Aperture luteous. A larger and more solid shell than the preceding species. AURICULA, Lamarck. A. subula, Quoy and Gaimard. Auricula subula, Quoy and Gaimard, Voy. Astrol., ii, p. 171, pl 13, figs. 39, 40. Deshayes, Lam. Hist., viii, p. 334. Kistaw Aurie., p. 58, pl. 8, figs. 9, 10. Jay, Cat. Shells, 1850, p. 265. A. Adare and Reeve, Voy. Samarang, p. 55, pl. 14,-fig. 15, with animal. Pfeiffer, Auric., no. 147; Mon. Auric.,i, p. 141. Gassies, Faun. Nouv. Caled., p- 69. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 115. Pythia subula, Beck, er Moll., p. 104. Ellobium subula, H. and A. rene Proc. Zool. Soc., 1854, Ome fe Gen. Moll., 11, p. 257 Auricula elongata, “Parreyss” Kuster, Auric., p. 53, pl. 8, figs. 6- 9. Jay, Cat. Shells, 1850, p. 264. Pfeiffer, Auric., no. 146; Mon. Auric., i, p. 140. Morelet, Ser. Conch., p. 98. Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1871, p. 18. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 115. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 88. Auricula Buddii, Parreyss, MS. Ellobium elongatum, H. and. A. Adams, Proc. Zool. Soe., 1854, p. 9; Gen. Moll., ii, p. 237. sae ee Oparicum, H. and A. Adams, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1854, p. ; Gen. Moll., ii, p. 237. gore icula Oparica, Pfeifter, ‘Mon. Auric.,i p. 1389; Syn. Auric., no. 46; Novit. Conch., i, p. 28, pl. 7, figs. 14 128 Aur ee subulus, Pfeiffer, Mon. Pac (Auric.), iv, p. 360. Auriculus elongatus, Pfeiffer, 1. ¢. 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 145 sf Ariculus Oparicus, Pfeiffer, 1. ¢. A few small examples found on the margin of a swamp at Upolu. It occurs in the Tonga and Viti Islands and ranges west as far as the East Indies. Morelet records it from the island of Mauritius. A small species, 9 to 16 mill. long, of a slender fusiform shape, smooth, shining surface, acute conical spire (which is frequently truncated by erosion); color white beneath an epidermis which va- ries from pale olivaceous-horn color to chestnut-black. The body whorl is narrow, usually longer than the spire, attenuated or round- ed at the base, and the columella is furnished with two, small, ap- proximating, oblique folds. A compressed subtransverse plait on the lower part of the parietal region. S. semiseulpta, H.and A. Adains. Ellobium semiseulptum, H. and A. Adams, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1854, p- 9; Gen. Moll. ii, p. 237. Auricula semisculpta, Pfeifter, Syn. Auric., no. 139; Mon. Auric., 1, p. 186; Novit, Conch., i, p. 39. pl. 10, figs. 7-9. Gassies, Faun. Nouv. Caled., p. 70, pl. 3, fig. 11. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 88. Auriculus semisculptus, Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum. (Auric.), iv, p. 359. A few dead specimens of small size found on the margin of a mangrove swamp at Upolu. It is also common at Wallis Island and very abundant and of large size at the Viti group, where they were found buried in rotten logs in swamps. This species varies considerably in shape, thickness, and in size, ranging from 12 to 30 mill. in leneth. The surface is shining, longi- tudinally striated, and the upper portions of the whorls are sculp- tured by crowded spiral rows of minute granules, which, in the adult sometimes cover the whole surface of the body-whorl. The shape of the shell varies from oblong-ovate to oblong-turreted, the spire more or less produced, and the color is white beneath a ful- vous-yellow or yellowish-horn colored epidermis. The parietal re- gion exhibits a prominent, compressed, oblique fold and just beneath is a smaller and more vertical one on the columella. TRUNCATELLA, Risso. T. valida, Pfeiffer. Truncatella valida, Pfeiffer, Zeit. Malak., 1846, p. 182; Mon. Auric., (appendix), 1, p. 184. Jay, Cat. Shells, 1854, p. 253. Kuster, Mon., p. 11, pl. 2, figs. 7, 8, 19-21, 23. H.and A. Adams, Gen. Moll, 146 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [ 1887. li, p. 311. Martens, Ostas. Zool., ii, p. 262. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 118. Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 477. Truncatella Vitiana, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1847, p. 208; Exp. Exp. Shells, p. 109, fig. 126; Otia, Conch., p. 40. H. and A. Adams, Gen. Moll, ii, p. 6. Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p- 856; 1870, p. 195. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 118. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 104. Truncatella Vitiacea, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 185. Taheitia Vitiana, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 477. Truncatella conspicua, “Bronn,” Pfeiffer, Mon. Auric. (appendix), i, p. 184. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p.118. Layard, Cat. Land and Fresh- water Shells, N. Caled., p. 1. Common just above high-water mark in sheltered places. It occurs also in Tonga, Ellis and Viti groups, and is diffused through- out Melanesia and the East India Islands. A solid, slightly tapering, cylindrical shell, of a white, luteous, corneous, or ruddy corneous color, with 43 slightly convex persist- ent whorls. The sculpture consists of nearly erect, obtuse ribs (25 to 85), on the body whorl. Peristome slightly auriculate at the suture. Length 6 to 8 mill. MOUSSONIA, 0. Semper. M. typica, 0. Semper. Pupa problematica, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 176. Moussonia typiea, O. Semper, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 296. Crosse, Jour. de Conch., 1866, p. 354, pl. 10, fig. 9. Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 476. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 118. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 102. | Paxillus (Moussonia) typica, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 305. Diplommatina problematica (Moussonia), Stoliezka, Jour. Asiat. Soc., 1871, p. 156. (Moussonia), Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum. iv, p. 92. A minute conical, dark colored species with turreted spire, 7 ob- liquely costulate whorls and small, rounded aperture and a columella tooth. Found at Upolu by Dr. Griiffe. OSTODES, Gould. O. tiara. Gould. Jyclostoma tiara, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soe. Nat. Hist., 1847, p. 204; Exp. Exp. Shells, p. 101, fig. 116. id 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 147 Cyclophorus tiara, Pfeifter, Consp. Cyclos., no. 116; Mon. Pneum., i, p. 84. Gray, Cat. Phan., p. 58. Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p- 179; (Ostodes) 1869, p. 350. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 120. Ostodes tiara, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1862, p. 240. Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 475. * Not uncommon at Upolu, where it was found at an altitude of “1.000 metres” by Dr. Graffe. Its large size (18 to 20 mill. in diam.), depressed turbinate form, dull greyish-horn color beneath a luteous, or horn-colored epider- mis, 5 convex whorls, the last one subcarinated, and the fine spiral lirations will readily distinguish it. 0. strigatus, Gould. Cyclostoma strigatum, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1847, p. 204; Exp. Exp. Shells, p. 102, fig. 117. Chemn. ed. 2d. p. 302, pl. 40, figs. 15, 16. Cyclophorus strigatus, Pfeiffer, Consp. Cyclos., no. 115; Mon. Pneum., i, p. 83. Gray, Cat. Phan., p. 58. H. and A. Adams, Gen. Moll., ii, p. 280. Reeve, Conch. Icon., pl. 14, fig. 58. Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 179; (Ostodes), 1869, p. 350. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 120. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff:, v, p. 99. Ostodes. strigatus, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist. 1861, p. 283. Cyclostoma plicatum, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1847, p. 205; Exp. Exp. Shells, p. 103, fig. 118. Cyclophorus plicatus, Pfeiffer, Consp. Cyclos., no. 114; Mon. Pneum., iv, p. 115. Reeve, Conch. Icon., pl., 14, fig. 58. ( Ostodes) Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 350. Ostodes plicatus, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1861, p. 283. Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 475. Cyclostoma Apic, Recluz, Jour. de Conch., 1851, p. 213, pl. 6, figs. 10, 10. Cyclophorus Apice, Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum., i, p. 83. Gray, Cat. Phan., p. 57. H. and A. Adams, Gen. Moll., ii, p. 279. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 119. Cyclostoma pulverulentum, Philippi, Chemnitz, ed. 2d. p. 301, pl. 40, figs. 15, 14. Cyclophorus pulverulentus, Pfeiffer, Consp. Cyclos., no. 114. Cyclostoma albida, Hombron and Jacquinot, Voy. Pol. Sud. Zool., v, p. 50, pl. 12, figs. 25-28. 148 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. Cyclophorus ? albidus, Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum., ii, p. 60. Abundant beneath decaying vegetation at Upolu, Tutuila and Savaii. This variable species may be recognized by its rude solid texture, more or less globose form, cinereous, or ruddy-horn color, 5 convex whorls, the last one rounded and more or less distinctly angulated on the margin of the moderate umbilicus. The sculpture consists of spiral, irregular, elevated lines which are frequently evanescent on the last whorl, and in the form known as plicatus, Gld., have the whorls transversely obliquely plicated. The spire is more or less elevated. The diameter varies from 8 to 12 mill. 0. Upolensis, Mousson. Cyclophorus Upolensis, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 180; ( Ostodes) 1869, p. 352. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 120. Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum., iv, p. 115. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 99. Ostodes Upolensis, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 475. Common beneath decaying vegetation at Upolu. A small, thin, whitish, depressed, conoid species with 43 convex whorls. the last one rounded or slightly angulated, and all with spiral elevated lines; sometimes the whorls are rudely plicated. The umbilicus is large and the margin is angulated. Diam. 72 mill. 0. adjunctus, Mousson. Cyclophorus (Ostodes) adjunctus, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 351, pl. 14, fig. 9. Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum., iv, p. 114. Ostodes adjunctus, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 475. Found at Tutuila by Dr. Griiffe. This species is widely umbilicated, rather solid, depressly-conical, whitish, with 43 slightly convex whorls, the last one carinated, and all with spiral elevated lines. Diam. 9 mill. 0. ? Brazieri, Cox. Cyclostoma Brazieri, Cox, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1870, p. 85. Cyclotus ? Brazieri, Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum., iv, p. 36. This species, which is unknown to me, was found by Mr, Brazier at Upolu. The following is Cox’s description as given by Mr. Pfeiffer :— “Testa pyramidata; spira acuta et elevata, apice rosea, anfr. 5, rotundati, sub lente subtilissima spiraliter striati; saturate cinna- momia; sutura profunda; umbilicus augustus et profundus; aper- 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 149 tura circularis; perist. simplex vix incrassatum. Operculum soli- dum extus perconcavum, marginibus anfractuum prominentibus. Lat. 0.13, alt. 16 poll.” Genus OMPHALOTROPIS, Pfeiffer. 0. conidea, Mousson. Omphalotropis conoidea, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 182. Pease. Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 146; Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 476. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 124. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff, v, p. 101, Realia ( Omphalotropis) conoidea, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p- 353 (et var. angulosa) ; 1871, p. 27. Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum., iv, p. 222. I am not acquainted with this species, which was found at Upolu by Dr. Griffe, and the variety at Savaii. He found it also at Wallis Island. An ovate conical species, 7 mill. long, with 63 rather flattened whorls, the last one large, ovately-rounded, perforated, and the per- foration margined by a filiform keel. Moussson says “epidermide subdestituta, punctis et lineis fulguratis saepe reticularis malleata.” In his remarks (Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 146) he says “Les jeunes individus, d’un rouge grisatre et peu fulgurés, sont, en effet, parfai- tement lisses; mais bientét on découvre des points d’une coloration blanchatre et mate, qui interrompent les parties polies et se dis- posent en lignes anguleuses, qui finissent par dominer 4 lage ou l’ épiderme est entirément détruit.” His variety angulata has the last whorl angular. O. bilirata, Mousson. Omphalotropis bilirata, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 184, pl. 14, fig. 13. Pease, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 146; Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 476. Realia ( Omphalotropis) bilirata, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 146 (var. elongata); 1871, p. 29. Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum., iv, p. 218. More rare than the preceding species and inhabits Upolu and Savaii, as well as Wallis Island in the Tonga group. A perforated, elongate-conical, pale corneous species with an in- cised sutural line which is margined above with a filiform keel. Whorls 6, flattened, the last one angulated and bicarinated with a periphery and basal thread-like keel. Length 52 mill. 150 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. 0. bifilaris, Mousson. Omphalotropis bifilaris, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 183. Pease, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 146; Proc, Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 476. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 124. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 104: Realia (Omphalotropis) bifilaris, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 353 (var. angusta); 1871, p. 29. Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum., iv, p. 232. Not infrequent at Upolu and Tutuila; found also at the Tonga group. Mousson’s variety angusta which inhabits the Viti Islands is probably a distinct species. — The type is a perforated, conical shell, 6$ mill. long, with a fuga- ceous fuscous epidermis and rounded whorls, the last one with a periphery and basal filiform keel. HELICINA., Lamarck. H. fulgora, Gould. Helicina fulgora, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1847, p. 201; Exp. Exp. Shells, p. 95, fig. 106. Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum., i. p. 401. Gray, Cat. Phan., p. 293. H. and A. Adams, Gen. Moll., ii, p. 302; Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 178; 1869, p. 356; 1870, p. 198 (var. expansa); 1871, p. 25 (var. diminuta). Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 476. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 125. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godetf.. v, p. 98 (var. delicatula). Helicina delicatula, “Mss.” Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 125. Abundant beneath decaying vegetation and is diffused throughout the group. The variety delicatula is common at Samoa, and Mousson’s diminuta is widely spread over the Tonga group. Vari- ety expansa inhabits Kanathia, one of the Viti Islands. This variable species may be recognized by its conoid form, thin texture, oblique striation, yellowish horn-color and radiating angu- lar or flexuous rufous strigations. Sometimes the stripes are inter- rupted so as to form a series of spots along the sutural line and on the acutely carinated periphery. The peristome is slightly expanded and forms an angle at its junction with the short columella. Diam. 4 to 9 mill. H., plicatilis, Mousson. Helicina plicatilis, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 178; 1869, p- 358. Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 476. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p- 126. Brazier, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 322. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 98. Pfeiffer, Mon. Reunion, iv, p. 251. 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 151 Common on trees at Upolu. A large, solid, white? depressly conical species, with 43 depressed whorls, the last one wide, obtusely angular, or bluntly carinated on the periphery. The peristome is sharp, and in adult individuals the anterior margin of the basal cellosity forms a crest-like ridge which joins the base of the outer-lip. Diam. 9 mill. Mr. Brazier (in P. Z.8., 1871, p. 322), says Mousson’s plicatilis is synonymous with Pfeiffer’s H. Norfolkensis, and that Cuming’s locality “Norfolk Island” is erroneous. Though the species has several years precedence in publication, and, if they are identical, Mr. Brazier is fully justified in rejecting Pfeiffer’s name which is a misnomer. The description of Norfolkensis agrees very nearly with the Samoa shell, but no mention is made of the peculiar crest-like basal ridge. The measurements are too large for the latter species. H. beryllina, Gould. Helicina beryllina, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1847, p. 202; Exp. Exp. Shells, p. 95, fig. 111. Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum., i, p. 354." Gray, Cat. Phan., p. 256. (Idesa) H. and A. Adams, Gen. Moll. ii, p.504. Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 197; 1869, p. 307 (var. flavida); 1870, p. 200. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 125. Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 476. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 98. Gould’s typical bery/lina inhabits the eastern portion of the Viti Islands, and Mousson’s var. flavida was found at Tutuila by Dr. Graffe. The latter variety has the spire and base yellowish, the last whorl whitish with a yellowish zone. In every other respect it differs none from the Vitian type, which is a large species (9 to 10 mill. in diam.), of a solid texture, depressly conoid in shape and rather variable in color: white, greenish-white, flesh-color, frequently with a dorsal red zone. Lip simple and the periphery obtuse. ‘H. interna, Mousson. Helicina interna, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 358; 1870, p- 201, pl. 8, fig. 6; 1871, p. 24. Puaetel, Cat. Conch., p. 125. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 99. Pfeiffer. Mon. Pneum., iv, p. 248. Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 476. This species, which is common to the Viti and Tonga Islands, was found by Dr. Griiffe at Savaii. A turbinately conical species of a uniform white, or yellowish color, with or without a spiral reddish-brown zone and regular coni- 152 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887.. cal spire. Whorls 5, slightly convex, the last one rounded or ob- tusely angulated. Peristome acute. Diam. 9 mill. H. musiva, Gould. Helicina musiva, Gould, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1847, p. 201; Expl. Exp. Shells, p. 98, fig. 107. Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum., 1, p- 368. Gray, Cat. Phan., p. 259. H. and A. Adams, Gen. Moll., ii, p- 302. Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 175 (var. Uveana); 1869, p- 357; 1870, p. 202 (vars. Vitiana et subcarinata); 1871, p. 25; 1873, p. 107 (var. rotundata). Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., bide p. 476. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 125 (musica in err.). This variable species is abundant beneath decaying vegetation on the lowlands near the sea-shore. It is also common in the Tonga and Viti Islands as well as in the low coral islands of Ellis group. The shape varies from depressed globose to sub-lenticular, and, in size varies from 3 to 5 mill. in diameter. The usual color is white, corneous, or pale yellowish horn-color with radiating reddish- chestnut more or less zigzagged or undulating stripes, rarely unicolor. The periphery is rounded, or subangulated and the peristome align: ly expanded. H. altivaga, Mousson. Helicina altivaga, “Mousson” Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff, v, p- 99. This species, which was neither described nor figured, was found at Upolu, by Dr. Graffe. ASSIMINEA, Leach. A. nitida, Pease. Hydrocena nitida, Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1864, p. 674. Assiminea nitida, Pease, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 165, pl. 7, fig. 11; Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 476. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p- 103. Garrett, Proc. Phil. Acad. Nat. Sci., 1879, p. 29; Jour. Phil. Acad. Nat. Sci., 1881, p. 408. ? Realia nitida, Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum., iii, p. 202. Hydrocena parvula, Mousson, Jour. de Conch., 1865, p. 184; 1873, p. 108. Omphalotropis parvula, Pease, Jour, de Conch., 1869, p. 155; Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 476. Paetel, Cat. Conch., p. 124. Assiminea parvula, Pease, Proc. Zool, Soc., 1871, p. 476. Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff, v, p. 103. 1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 153 Realia parvula, Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum., iii, p. 213. Assiminea lucida, Pease, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 166, pl. 7, fig. 10; Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 476. Assiminea ovata, “Pease” Schmeltz, Cat. Mus. Godeff., v, p. 103. Hydrocena pygmea, Gassies, Jour. de Conch., 1867, p. 63. Assiminea pygmea, Pease, Jour. de Conch., 1869, p. 165. ? Realia pygmea, Pfeiffer, Mon. Pneum., iv, p. 214. Hydrocena similis, Baird, in Cruise of the Curacoa. This species is distributed throughout all the groups from the Paumotu’s to the Viti Islands and New Caledonia. They are found beneath decaying leaves, under stones and dead wood. It may be recognized by its small size (2+ to 4 mill. long), smooth, shining surface, ovate-conical form, light or dark corneous color ; rarely with a faint transverse band on the last whorl. 11 154 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. May 3. Mr. THos. MEEHAN, Vice-President, in the chair. Twenty-three persons present. On Aphyllon as a root Parasite—Mr. Thomas Meehan remarked that the life histories of many of our root parasites were still obscure,—in many cases we hardly knew whether they were annual or perennial ; how long it took for them to perfect themselves, and in some cases it was even doubted whether they were parasites in the true sense of the word, or merely obtained a start by feeding on partially decom- posed vegetable matter. In one of the earlier editions of Flora Ces- trica, Dr. Wm. Darlington observes that he has often dug Aphyl- lon uniflorum without finding it attached to anything,—and, though he omits this remark in later editions, he observes that it is ‘‘Per- ennial?” The speaker remarked that he had dug this species very carefully when in bloom, and washed the earth gently away, finding them truly parasitic on the coarser fibres of Asters and Goldenrods. They very readily separate from their connection unless carefully handled, which may account for the failure to note their true para- sitic nature. A specimen sent by Mr. Morris, a florist of Des Moines Iowa, of an allied species A. fasciculatum Torr. and G., (Phelipea fasciculata of some authors), gives the opportunity for acquiring certain knowledge in relation to these points. Mr. Morris raised numerous plants of the common bedding geranium (Pelargonium zonale). ‘The cuttings were made in October and November last. They were potted in earth taken from a piece of newly cleared woodland in the vicin- ity. The plants appeared in many of the geranium pots in his green- house, and were in full flower in April. As the plants were only in this soil for about three months, the seeds must have sprouted, flowered, and were on the decline in that time. They are therefore annual, and a very short-lived annual at that. In regard to the parasitism, the attachment in several that Mr. Meehan had examined, was to the coarser roots. In the plant ex- hibited, it was to the main stem of the cuttings beneath the ground, and not to the roots, which in this specimen were merely weak fibres. The geranium, an African plant, and of a very different character from these which the Aphyllon has been in the habit of feeding on, proving so acceptable to it in this instance, shows that it is either not partial in its parasitic tastes, or that it has ready powers of adaptation when something suited to its peculiar habits comes along. May 10. The President, Dr. JosepH Letpy, in the chair. Twenty persons present. 1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 155 The following was presented for publication :-— “Contributions towards a Synopsis of the American forms of Fresh- Water Sponges with Descriptions of those named by other authors and from all parts of the world.,’ By Edw. Potts. The death of Robert H. Hare, a member, was announced. On the Stipules of Magnolia Frazeri—Mr. Thomas Meehan exhib- ited some fresh flowers of Magnolia Frazeri, Walter—(CM. auriculata, Lamarck), and said that when he contributed the paper on the “Stipules of Magnolia and Liriodendron” to the Proceedings of the Academy in 1870, he had not had the opportunity to examine fresh flowers of this species. It was not common in cultivation from the fact that the plants grown rarely produced seeds, and there had been little opportunities to get seeds from its North Carolina home. On his grounds of late years a specimen had annually borne flowers, which appeared very early, following immediately the flowers of the Yulan, and were as large and sweet as that species of China. A point made in the | paper referred to was that the petals of Mag- nolia were not modified leaves, as the petals of flowers would be broadly stated to be in morphological works but rather modified stipules, in which case the petiole and leaf blade have wholly abor- ted. At the time of its appearance, Dr. Asa Gray, to whose kindly criticisms on thisand other papers he had been so often deeply indebted, wrote expressing his interest in the paper, saying that the obser- vations confirmed the views of some German observer, whose name he could not recall, that the petals of many flowers were but modi- fied stipules. Mr. Meehan had not been able to meet with the name of the author or of the paper referred to by Dr. Gray, or the tenor of the author’s views. Indeed his observations and those of the author referred to, must have been wholly overlooked by their co-laborers, or else the views have not commended themselves to their good judgment. For his own part the subsequent observations of nearly twenty years had convinced him that the petals of most flowers should be considered enlarged stipules or thinly dilated bases of petioles, rather than modified leaves, as we should understand this term. In many species of Roses, especially in Rosa Kamtcha- tica, and Rosa cinnamomea the stipules could be noted increasing, and the size of the leaf blade diminishing on the branch as it ap- proached inflorescence. Often the tips of the sepals would develop to minute leaf blades, and in a few instances he had had seen the same appendages on abnormal petals. Often the stipules, especially in Rosa Kamtchatica, would have the red colors of the petals, when at the nodes immediately below the axis from which the peduncle pro- ceeded. There could be no possible doubt in the minds of those who would carefully compare, and watch for occasional aberrations, that the petals of the rose were rather transformed stipules than complete leaves. Precisely the same process of development from stipules to 156 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. petals could be traced in some Leguminose, and especially in the common Red Field Clover. When vegetation was arrested in its growth and bud scales were formed for the protection of the growth-germ for the next season, it was the stipule or dilated base of the petiole that formed the scale. This was evident to those who watched the bursting of the growth buds in spring of the species of Fraxinus, or of the Dwarf Horse Chestnut (Aesculus parviflora) common in gardens. The formation of petals for the protection of the reproductive germ, was also the result of arrested vegetative growth, and we may safely assume that the same law operates on the stipules and petiolar bases, in the one case as in the other. This Magnolia confirms these views, as already indicated in the paper referred to. The stipules increase in size, and the develop- ment of the leaf blade is arrested just in proportion as the true petals are approached, until the last one preceding the true flower is nearly as large as the petals, and of nearly their form and char- acter. Insome cases the stipule appears as a perfect petal, with not a of leaf blade left. The true sepal or petal has lost all trace of petiole or blade,—it is broadened at the base, and, we see, cannot be aught but the stipule modified. The fact that the petals of flowers are rather the bases of petioles or stipules, than modifications of full typical leaves may not only be proved by such observations as have been referred to, but accords with that philosophy which would expect to find an uniform law result from uniform causes. For if, as cannot be doubted, the check vegetative growth produce petal a bud scale out of a stipule, the check to vegetative growth should produce a petal (a flower scale) out of the same typical form. The theory givesto morphological law a harmony of action that is wanting without it. Maw ai. Mr. J. H. REDFIELD, in the chair. Twenty-eight persons present. May 24. Mr. Cuas. Morris, in the chair. Twenty-nine persons present. A paper entitled “Notes on the Anatomy of Echidna hystrix.” By H. C. Chapman M. D., was presented for publication. Permission was given to change the name of a communication presented October 19, 1886, by Prof. Wm. B. Scott, for publication in the Journal of the Academy, from “The Genera Mesonyx and Pachyaena, Cope.” to “On some new and little-known Creodonts.” 1887.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 157 May 31. The President, Dr. JosepH Lerpy, in the chair. Twelve persons present. Asplanchna Ebbesbornii.—Dr. Leidy remarked that a few days ago Mr. Wm. P. Seal, had submitted to him a four ounce bottle swarming with animalcules, which at first glance he supposed to be a species of Cypris, but on closer inspection he observed to be a rotifer. As seen with the naked eye they appeared transparent whitish, and of conical shape and about half a line in length. They swam ac- tively, with the crown uppermost, and at all levels of the® water. The rotifer accords closely with the description of Asplanchna Ebbesbornii, given by Hudson in the Journal of the Royal Micro- scopical Society i in 1883, p. 621, pl. ix, x. As in this it has a dor- sal and ventral projection. At ‘times it was observed that the rotifer would retract the crown and project a pair of lateral conical horns, when it would appear as broad as it was long. The stomach is yel- lowish and suspended from the pharynx by a long narrow cesopha- gus. There wasa single eye. The animal is viviparous, and was observed in a number of instances to suddenly give birth to a young one which was about two thirds the size of the parent. and resem- bled it in form. Specimens measured from 7 to 13 mm in length. Mr. Hudson’s specimens were obtained from a duck- -pond in Wilt- shire, England, the only known locality. Mr. Seal’s specimens were obtained from a “filthy sewage-fed pond,—a duck-pond and hog-wal- low” below the city. In summer it is completely covered with duck weed, Lemna. The water swarms with the rotifer in company with Daphnia. My.Seal remarks that he noticed sand pipers about the place and thinks these birds are especially instrumental in distrib- uting the lower forms of aquatic life. The following were elected correspondents :— Henry A. Ward of Rochester, Addison E. Verrill of New Haven, R. P. Whitfield of New York, Edgar A. Smith of London, August Brot of Geneva, E. Ray Lankester of London, William E. Hoyle of Edinburgh, Eduard von Martens of Berlin, William Kobelt of Schwanheim, S. Clessin of Ochsenfurt, Rev. M. Heude, S. J. of Zika—Wei, China, Rudolph Bergh of Copenhagen, A. T. de Roche- brune of Paris and Herrman Friele of Bergen. The following were ordered to be printed :— 158 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. CONTRIBUTIONS TOWARDS A SYNOPSIS OF THE AMERICAN FORMS OF FRESH WATER SPONGES WITH DESCRIPTIONS OF THOSE NAMED BY OTHER AUTHORS AND FROM ALL PARTS OF THE WORLD. BY EDWARD POTTS. Dr. Bowerbank’s “Monograph of the Spongillidze,” (Proce. Zool. Soc., London, 1863 p. 440 ete.) and “The History and Classification of the known species of Spongilla,” by H. J. Carter Esq. F. R. 8. etc. (Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist., London, 1881, p. 77 ete.) contain the only complete synopses of the fresh water sponges, as known at their respective dates. Both writers have, in their introductory remarks, given full information as to the history and bibliography of this branch of study, which it cannot be necessary now to repeat. My design in the preparation of the present paper has been, primarily, to describe those genera and species, mostly North American, that have been discovered since the date of Mr. Carter’s publication; next, to detail the results of a somewhat extended examination into the character and variations, in North America, of those species that have long been familiarly known in Europe; and thirdly, to make it valuable for reference as a Monograph, by adding brief technical descriptions of all other “good” species. A further purpose, and one that I hold much at heart, is the desire to revive, among scientists and lovers of nature, an apprecia- tion of the apparently almost forgotten fact of the existence of sponges in our fresh water; to show them that they are easily found and collected; that they are deeply interesting as living subjects of study, microscopic and otherwise; and that, by simple processes, their typ- ical parts may readily be prepared for classification and the permanent preservation of their various singular forms. With this end in view the situations and conditions in which the American species were found, have been briefly described, suggesting the hope- fulness of an exploration of similar localities in other neighborhoods. During the last six or seven years the leisure time of a very busy life has been largely occupied in the collection and examination of sponge material. In this labor of love I have been greatly aided by the contributions and correspondence of friends, till then unknown, in widely separated districts, for whose thoughtful kindness ¢ PROC. ACAD. NAT. SCI. PHILA. 1887, Peer ey me “ay, fo Moe We Me MG D> ee. Dr. C. W. deLannoy, del. POTTS ON FRESH WATER SPONGES. PROG, ACAD, NAT. SCI. PHILA, 1887, Pie VE POTTS ON FRESH WATER SPONGES, PROC. ACAD. NAT. SCI. PHILA, 1887. PL. VIL. V S. G. Foulke, del. POTTS ON FRESH WATER SPONGES. PROC. ACAD. NAT. SCI. PHILA. 1887. PL. VIII. POTTS ON FRESH WATER SPONGES. PL. IX. PROC, ACAD. NAT. SCI. PHILA. 1887, del. ulke, Si (Gi. Fo POTTS ON FRESH WATER SPONGES. PL. X. PROC. ACAD. NAT. SCI. PHILA. 1887. k Mi Ws a . rent S WwW - \ S. G. Foulke, del. POTTS ON FRESH WATER SPONGES. PROC. ACAD. NAT. SCI. PHILA, 1887. PL. XL. S. G. Foulke, del. POTTS ON FRESH WATER SPONGES. PROG. ACAD. NAT. SCI. PHILA. 1887, PL. XII. POTTS ON FRESH WATER SPONGES, 1887. | NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 159 I now desire to express my indebtedness. It were idle to attempt to name them all; but to Professors Allen, Cope, Hunt, Leidy and Heilprin of Philadelphia, to Dawson, Hyatt, Bumpus and Osborn in other localities, I am particularly indebted. As active workers in the same field and during nearly the same period, I am glad to acknowledge my constant obligation to my friends Mr. Henry Mills, of Buffalo, N. Y. and Mr. B. W. Thomas of Chicago, Ill., whose names will frequently be found throughout the following pages. More recently my valued friend and correspondent Mr. A. H. Mac- Kay, of Pictou, Nova Scotia, has been untiring in his efforts, very successful in his local and New Foundland collections and most generous in the contribution of his valuable material. I owe to my friend Prof. John A. Ryder of the University of Pennsylvania, what has been of more value than any material, the most unfailing courtesy and the best of advice, assistance and encouragement to persevere in my work. From abroad I have been honored with the correspon- dence and publications of Dr. W. Dybowski of Niankow, Russia, Prof. Marshall of Leipsig, Vejdovsky and Petr of Prague, Bohemia. Prof. Vejdovsky has laid me under especial obligations by his repeated gifts of Bohemian and other European sponges, besides his “Diagnosis of the European Spongillidae” now published as a very valuable contribution to this paper. I thank Dr. C. W. de Lannoy, late of Chester, Pennsylvania, for the original drawings for plates V aud VI the excellence of which will be conceded by all acquainted with the subjects. Two names remain of friends, without whose influence and assis- tance this Monograph would probably never have been written. The first has passed the alloted term of “three score years and ten,” and now, with failing strength, but unfailing love of his work, is hastening to garner the last ripe sheayes of a life of honorable scien- tific labor. I count it a great privilege to have become acquainted, near the beginning of my work, with H. J. Carter, Esq. of Devonshire, England, than whom no obscure scientist could hope for a more constant friend or more courteous correspondent. To the fine artistic skill and unwearying patience of the other, Miss 8. G. Foulke of Philadelphia, my readers, with myself, owe a large part of the value of this work, in the admirable drawings from which plates VII to XII have been reproduced. These reproductions are the work of the Photo-Engraving Co. (N. Y.) and while it is regretted that from the very nature of the 160 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. process no photo-engraved plate could repeat, with their relative delicacy, the finer lines of Miss Foulke’s beautiful drawings, in other respects they are very well done. A few words of elementary information may be desirable to aid those who for the first time undertake the study of sponges. In constitution and general appearence the fresh water sponges resemble many of those of a marine habitat, excepting in one particular. This crucial point is the presence, during certain resting seasons, in most of the former, and the absence from all the latter, of those “seed-like bodies” that have been known and described by various authors under the names of ovaria, gemmules, statoblasts, statospheres, sphzerule, etc. In the past I have generally avoided the use of the familiar word statoblast, as it did not seem clearly proven that the function of these “seed like bodies” of the sponges was identical with that of the statoblasts of the polyzoa ete; and have used the terms statospheres, or spherule, as suggesting merely their general appearance. Latterly, however, I have con- curred with several European writers in the use of the old term, gemmules; the principal objection to which, is that with some persons the name may seem like a return to the exploded vegetable theory of sponges. It is hardly necessary to say that this idea is not intended. In shape these gemmules are neariy spherical; they are about sy of an inch in diameter, or as large as very small mustard seeds. They are found sometimes in continuous layers, as at the base of encrusting sponges; sometimes they rest singly in the interspaces among the skeleton spicules; again, they occur in groups of a dozen or less, sparsely scattered through the sponge mass, or in smaller, denser groups, closely enveloped in a compact cellular parenchyma. Their principal coat, presumably of chitin, encloses a compact mass of protoplasmic globules, each of which is charged with numbers of discoidal particles, whose function, though all important, it is not my intention to discuss in the present paper. A circular orifice, rarely more than one, through this chitinous coat, sometimes, though inaptly called the hilum, should be known as the foramen or foraminal aperture. Through it, at the time of germination, the above mentioned protoplasmic bodies make their exit, crawling by an amceboid movement, and spreading out on every side. In a few hours the infant colony may be seen producing aqueous currents, 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 161 developing and arranging skeleton spicules, and in every way living the life of a young sponge. The foraminal aperture is rarely plain; more frequently it is infundibular, (PI. V, fig. i, a,), having a slightly raised and expanded margin; while in still other species it is prolonged into cylindrical or funnel shaped tubules (Pl. VI, fig. lii, iv, and v.) In most species, possibly in all under normal conditions, the chitinous coat is surrounded by a “crust” (Pl. VI, figs. i, ii, ete.), composed of air cells, often so minute as to be with difficulty “resolvable,” even with a high power of the microscope; in other species so large as to be readily discerned by the use of a low one. In the first instance it has been called a “granular,” in the other, a “cellular” “crust.” In this are imbedded (PI. V and VI,), the spicules which, as will be hereafter seen, are relied upon to determine the generic classification of these sponges. To recur for a moment to the resemblance stated to exist between the fresh water and some of the marine sponges,—we can see no obvious reason why ail the marine forms should not have their representatives among those belonging to fresh water; but it is a fact that all of the latter, as yet discovered, are silicious ;—that is, the skeleton or framework, (corresponding to the elastic fibre of which commercial sponges are composed) upon which the slime-like sponge flesh, known as “sarcode,” is supported, and through whose interstices the currents meander, is composed of silicious spicules, slightly bound together by an almost invisible quantity of firmer sarcode or perhaps of colloidal silica. To form the main lines of this skeleton structure the spicules, averaging about tooth. of an inch in length, are fasciculated in bands made up of several spicules, lying side by side, and somewhat overlapping at their extremities; the crossing lines being formed of more slender fascicles, or even of single spicules. In the different species these “skeleton” spicules vary in size, in the shape of their terminations, and in their more or less spinous character (see Plates VII to XII, a,a,); but while these differences serve, in some degree, as specific guides, they are not sufficiently constant or positive to form a basis for generic arrangement. Besides the skeleton spicules, a second class, known as “dermal” or flesh spicules (Pl. VII to XII, ¢, d, e, ete.) is found only in some species and in greater or less numbers, either lying upon the outer “dermal” film or lining the canals in the deeper portions of the sponge. They 162 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. are almost always much smaller than those of the skeleton and are never fasciculated or bound together in any way. A third class of spicules is composed of those before mentioned as imbedded in the “crust” of the gemmules, and form what may be regarded as their armor or defensive coating. These gemmule-spicules represent two principal and several subordinate types, which have been selected by Mr. Carter to define the different genera into which he has divi- ded the single genus Spongilla of the earlier authors. His method of classification will be given later. The sponge in its entirety as a growing organism can generally be easily recognized by the collector, after he has escaped from the thraldom of the idea that any fixed growth, of a more or less vivid green color, must be a plant of some kind. Of course the mosses and confervee will be rejected after examination, upon the evidence given by the leaves of the one and the smooth slender threads of the other. If doubts remain as to any specimen, the presence in it of efferent or discharging apertures, like those of the commercial sponge, if it is really a sponge, may serve to dispel them, and still more con- vincing proof will be given by the use of a pocket lens, in detecting the points of multitudinous spicules thickly studding the surface. When, in addition to these guiding features, the spherical gemmules just described are found within or under it, there should be no fur- ther hesitation. The green color spoken of, is common and characteristic; yet it is not universal, but closely dependent upon the quantity or quality of the light received. When a sponge has germinated away from the light and has grown upon the lower side of a plank or stone, it will be found nearly white, gray or cream colored. As it enlarges and creeps around the edge and up into the full sun light it assumes a delicate shade of green, deepening as the exposure increases, till it attains a bright vegetable hue. Even in the sunlight, however, some species are never green. (See description of Meyenia leidyi.) These organisms have occasionally been discovered growing in water unfit for domestic uses; but asa rule they prefer pure water, and in my experience the finest specimens have always been found where they were subjected to the most rapid currents. The lower side of large, loose stones at the “riffs” or shallow places in streams ; the rocks amid the foaming water at the foot of a mill-dam fall; the timbers of a sluice-way, the casing of a turbine waterwheel, or the walls of a “tail race” beneath an old mill;—in all these places 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 163 they have been found in great abundance and of a very lusty growth. Of all discouraging situations it is almost hopeless to look for them in shallow water haying a mud bottom. Mud is their great enemy, as gravity aids their natural currents to fill the cavities with earthy matters that soon suffocate them, because the latter are too feeble to throw them off. Of course in any body of water liable to be charged with sedimentary material, the principle of natural selection favors those growing on the lower side of their bases of support, which protect them from the intrusion of the heavier particles. For that reason perpendicular and water logged or floating timbers, submerged stumps of trees, and branches drooping into the water from trees or bushes along the banks, are favorite locations. They do not disdain more temporary support, such as weeds and water- grasses. I have received from a friend, specimens growing upon water plants that wild ducks had torn from the bottom, and that were found floating upon the surface of Lake Michigan. Through the clear water of our northern lakes, we may often see them lying in slender lines upon the leaves of submerged weeds, or in beautiful cushion-like masses upon the stones or gravel. In my explorations I have had much satisfaction in the use of a long pole, to which was attached a small net, with one part of its edge shaped into a scraper, like a garden hoe. This enabled me to examine the surface of timbers at a depth of eight or ten feet and to tear offand bring up sponges from that depth; beyond which all is tomean “aqua incognita.” Biologists labor at some disadvantage in studying the fauna of our fresh water, as compared with the facilities offered them in collecting ocean subjects. The nets and dredges of many exploring expeditions have, at least, begun to acquaint us with the inhabitants of the “deep sea;” but who knows anything about the fauna or the flora of our deep fresh-water lakes, or even of our larger streams? The largest specimens of this group ever reported, were dredged from the bottom of Lake Baikal in Central Asia, (Lubomirskia). I know of no similar attempts to collect them else- where. It is to be hoped that means may be found ere long to make such explorations, which must result in an increase of knowledge in many lines. Meantime no opportunity offered by the accidental or designed drainage of artificial reservoirs should be neglected. I have spent hours of great pleasure and profit while groping around the distributing reservoirs upon Fairmount Hill, Philadelphia, at times when the water was drawn off for cleaning or repairs. 164 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [ 1887. One further point as to methods of collecting and I shall finish this section of my subject. Unless our sponges are large, it is difficult to detach them without mutilation, from the rough surfaces of stones. It is therefore preferable to gather, when possible, those growing upon wood, which may be scraped or chipped without injury to them. It is essential to secure the very lowest portions, as it is there the gemmules often abide. The proper season for collecting fresh water sponges, in waters of the temperate zone, depends upon the purpose of the collector. If it is his desire to gather cabinet specimens merely, for the iden- tification of old or the determination of novel species, it is hardly worth while to begin before July. As with the flowering of plants, the maturity of different species of sponges is attained at various dates, between mid-summer and late in November. - The essential point is, that the gemmules and their armature shall be fully perfected; and when that condition is attained in any specimen, there is no reason for further delay. I would, however, recommend to intending students a far higher object for their ambition ;—that is, the study of the physiology and life history of sponges as members of a sub-kingdom whose position has been greatly questioned and whose character, derivation and sub- sequent evolution are very important and perplexing topics. I would have such workers search for and examine them at all seasons of the year, (even in midwinter, when I have never failed in suita- ble situations to find some in a growing condition), keeping memo- randa as to each species separately ; noting the date of their germi- nation or earliest appearance, the locality, elevation, temperature; rapidity of growth at different seasons; time and manner of forma- tion of gemmules; stability or decadence during the winter; modes of distribution and progression, whether always down stream or by other more adventitious methods; what becomes of the gemmules upon reaching salt-water, and the thousand and one problems that go to make up the life history of any animal form, and that, in this instance, have been very little studied. I am particularly anxious that some competent person should undertake their study in the briny, brackish and the fresh water lakes, pertaining to what is known as the “Great Basin of the West,” with a special view to as- certain the conditions under which they form “protected gemmules”’ in such localities. By this means, light may possibly be thrown upon the problem of their possible derivation from the marine sponges. 1887. ] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 165 Great pleasure and profit may be attained in the same direction, by germinating the statoblasts or gemmules under artificial condi- tions, and studying the development of the young sponges by the aid of as high powers of the microscope as the ingenuity of each student may bring to bear upon the subject. I take the liberty to. copy from the Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist. 1882, p. 365, Mr. Carter’s directions for germinating statoblasts, which will be found valuable. “To obtain the young spongille it is only necessary to get a portion of an old living specimen bearing statoblasts, and, having taken out a few (six to twelve) of the latter, to roll them gently between the folds of a towel to free them from all extra material as much as possible, place them in a watch glass so as not to touch each other, with a little water, in a saucer or small dish filled with small shot to keep the saucer upright and, covering them with a glass shade, transfer the whole to a window bench opposite to the light. In a few days the young Spongilla may be observed (from its white color) is- suing from the statoblast and gluing the latter as well as itself to the watch glass, when it will be ready for transfer to the field of the micro- scope for examination, care being taken that it is never uncovered by the water, which may be replenished as often as necessary; but of course the object—-glass (when ¢ inch with high occular is used for viewing the minute structure) must admit of being dipped into the water without suffusion of the lens.” My own first experience in the propagation of fresh water sponges may prove iastructive in various ways. Late in the autumn of the year 1879, in a pond within the “Centennial Grounds,” Philadel- phia, I found for the first time a living sponge. It was a vigorous, branching specimen of Spongilla lacustris, charged with gemmules in all parts of its structure. A fragment firmly attached to a stone was taken home and placed in a gallon “specie-jar” with water, in the hope, begotten of inexperience, that it would continue to grow, exhibit its inflowing and exhalent currents, etc. On the contrary, and as I now know, almost necessarily, it died, and in a few days the water became insupportably foul. It was changed and another trial made, which resulted as before. This time the jar was thorough- ly cleansed; the stone with the attached sponge was taken out and held long under a flowing hydrant before it was replaced in the jar, which was now left in an outer shed and, very naturally, forgotten. Weeks passed and winter came on, and one severe night the water in my jar was frozen solid and the vessel fractured. I supposed 166 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [1887. that the low temperature to which it had been subjected would prove fatal to the germs, but, as the specimen was a fine one, it seemed well to save it, even in its skeletonized condition. So, when its icy envelope had been melted off, the sponge was again thorough- ly washed until all the sarcode was removed, when, in a fresh jar, it again became a parlor specimen. , I do not clearly remember when signs of germination were first ob- served. It was probably in January, as during that month I find that artificial conditions very frequently bring about the hatching of such animal germs as those of the polyzoa ete. I detected first a filmy, grayish-white growth that seemed associated with the de- tached gemmules which lay in the groove around the bottom of the jar.