f Si::- lit'r ^ ^^il HARVARD UNIVERSITY. LIBRARY MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY ^a.A|T \ PROCEEDINGS OF THE American Philosophical Society HELD AT PHILADELPHIA PROMOTING USEFUL KNOWLEDGE VOLUME LVIII 1919 PHILADELPHIA THE AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY 1919 PRESS OF THE NEW ERA PRINTING COMPANY LANCASTER, PA. CONTENTS Page. The Parasitic Aculeata, A Study in Evolution. By William Morton Wheeler i The Relation of the Diet to Pellagra. By E. V. AIcCollum. . 41 Evolution and Mystery in the Discovery of America. By Edwin Swift Balch 55 Tatar Material in Old Russian. By J. Dyneley Prince 74 The Energy Loss of Young Women during the Muscular Ac- tivity of Light Household Work. By Francis G. Benedict and Alice Johnson 89 Alternating-current Planevector Potentiometer Measurements at Telephonic Frequencies. By A. E. Kennelly and Edy Velander 97 Some Scientific Aspects of the Meteorological Work of- the United States Army. By Robert A. Millikan 133 Detecting Ocean Currents by Observing their Hydrogen-ion Concentration. By Alfred Goldsborough Mayor 150 Recent Discoveries of Fossil Vertebrates in the West Indies and their Bearing on the Origin of the Antillean Fauna. By W. D. Matthew 161 The Relative Contribution of the Staple Commodities to the National Food Consumption. By Raymond Pearl 182 Self-Luminous Night Haze. By E. E. Barnard 223 Graphical Representation of Functions of the nth Degree. By Francis E. Nipher 236 The Crocker Eclipse Expedition from the Lick Observatory, June 8, 1918. By W. W. Campbell 241 The Expedition of the Mount Wilson Observatory to the Solar Eclipse of June 8. 1918. By J. A. Anderson 255 The Lowell Observatory Eclipse Observations, June 8, 1918. Prominences and Coronal Arches. By C. O. Lampland. . . 259 The Flash Spectrum. By S. A. Mitchell 265 iii iv CONTENTS. Page Photo-electric Photometry of the 1918 Echpse. By Jakob KuNz and Joel Stebbins 269 The Sproul Observatory Echpse Expedition, June 8, 1918. Coronal Arches and Streamers. By John A. Miller 272 Results of Observations of the Eclipse by the Expedition from the Yerkes Observatory. By Edwin B. Frost 282 The Basis of Sex Inheritance in Sphserocarpos. By Charles E. Allen " 289 The Application of Sanitary Science to the Great War in the Zone of the Army. By Bailey K. Ashford 317 Star Clusters and Their Contribution to Knowledge of the Uni- verse. By Harlow Shapley 337 Hydration and Growth. By D. T. MacDougal 346 Some Considerations on the Ballistics of a Gun of Seventy-five- mile Range. By Arthur Gordon Webster 373 On a New (?) Method in Exterior Ballistics. By Arthur Gor- don Webster and Mildred Allen 382 Characters and Restoration of the Sauropod Genus Camara- saurus Cope. By Henry Fairfield Osborn and Charles Craig Mook 386 Trogloglanis Pattersoni, a New Blind Fish from San Antonio, Texas. By Carl H. Eigenmann 397 Polarized Light in the Study of Ores and INIetals. By Fred. E. Wright 401 On the Luciopimelodinae, a New Subfamily of the South Amer- ican Siluridse. By Chas. E. Driver 448 Minutes iii Index XV PROCEEDINGS OF THE American Philosophical Society HELD AT PHILADELPHIA FOR PROMOTING USEFUL KNOWLEDGE Vol. LVIII. 1919. No. 1. CONTENTS PAGE The Parasitic Aculeata, A Study in Evolution. B}- William Morton Wheeler .......... i The Relation of the Diet to Pellagra. By E. V. McCollum . . 41 Evolution and Mystery in the Discovery of America. By Edwix Swift Balch ........... 55 Tatar Material in Old Russian. By J. Dyneley Prince . . 74 The Energy Loss of Young Women during the Muscular Activity of Light Household Work. By Francis G. Benedict and Alice Johnson 89 PHILADELPHIA THE AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY 104 South Fifth Street 1919 The American Philosophical Society anm>w*ces that an award will be made in the year 1921 of the HENRY M. PHILLIPS PRIZE The subject upon which essays are to be submitted is The Control of the Foreign Relations of the United States : The Relative Rights, Duties, and Responsibilities of the Presi- dent, of the Senate and the House, and of the Judiciary, in Theory and in Practice. The Essay shall contain not more than one hundred thousand words, exclusive of notes, and must be in the possession of the Society on or before December 31, 1920. The Prize for the crowned essay will be Two Thousand Dollars, in gold coin of the United States, to be paid as soon as may be after the award. Attention is called to the following regulations governing the award of the Prize: Competitors for the prize shall affix to their essays some motto or name (not the proper name of the author, however) and when the essay is forwarded to the Society it shall be accompanied by a sealed envelope containing within the proper name and address of the author and on the outside thereof the motto or name adopted for the essay. At a stated meeting of the Society in pursuance of the advertisement, all essays received up to that time shall be referred to a Committe of Judges, to consist of five persons, who shall be selected by the Society from nominations made by the Committee on the Henry M. Phillips Prize. Essays may be written in any language, but, if not in English, must be accompanied by an English translation. No essay which has been already published or printed, or for which the author has received any prize or profit of any nature whatsoever, shall be accepted in competition for the prize. Essays must be typewritten on only one side of the paper, and six copies must be furnished by their respective authors for the use of the Committee of Judges. The literary property of such essays shall be in their author, subject to the right of the Society to publish the crowned essay in its " Transactions " or " Proceedings." The Society reserves the right not to award the prize if none of the com- peting essays is deemed worthy of it. John Bassett Moore, David Jayne Hill, Simeon E. Baldwin, John Cadwalader, W. W. Keen, William B. Scott, President ex-officio, Committee. The essays must be sent, addressed to the President of the American Philosophical Society, No. 104 South Fifth Street, Phila- delphia, U. S. A. PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY HELD AT PHILADELPHIA FOR PROMOTING USEFUL KNOWLEDGE THE PARASITIC ACULEATA, A STUDY IN EVOLUTION.^ By WILLIAM MORTON WHEELER. (Read April 25, igig.) There is undoubtedly much to be said in favor of the opinion commonly held by entomologists that the fruitfulness of their inves- tigations is apt to be directly proportional to the intensity of their specialization, but it is also true that this very specialization may often preclude an adequate appreciation or even a recognition of phenomena that would profoundly impress the worker who pos- sesses more general biological interests. This statement is not inapplicable to the subject of the following study, which is an at- tempt to collate the data accumulated in their respective fields by a number of observers of ants, bees and wasps and relating to certain types of parasitism w^iich keep recurring in various natural families of the Aculeata in response to frequently recurring stimuli or situa- tions in the organic environment. The few who have published comprehensive accounts of the phenomena have failed to present then! as clearly and cogently as the facts would seem to warrant. I am aware that my own treatment of the subject may leave much to be desired and especially that my account of the bees, a difficult and extensive group to which I have been able to devote compara- tively little study, is rather summary, but every attempt to attain 1 Contributions from the Entomological Laboratory of the Bussey Insti- tution, Harvard University. No. 155. PROC. AMER. PHIL. SOC, VOL. LVIII. A, JUNE II IQIQ. 2 WHEELER— THE PARASITIC ACULEATA. broader generalization has its attendant risks and inadequacies. If I succeed in directing renewed attention to an interesting series of facts and to some of the problems which they suggest, the purpose of this article will have been accomplished. In considering the parasitic Aculeata I shall adhere to the fol- lowing classification, which though in certain respects artificial and unsatisfactory from the standpoint of phylogenetic development, will nevertheless facilitate an understanding of the history of our knowledge of the subject: I. Nonsocial Parasites. 1. Solitary Bees. 2. Solitary Wasps. II. Social Parasites. 1. Ants. a. Guest Ants. b. Slave-makers. c. Temporary Social Parasites. d. Permanent Social Parasites. 2. Social Bees. 3- Social Wasps. The solitary bees may justly claim our attention first, because they comprise such a large number of parasitic forms which have been objects of study for more than a century. The taxonomy of the bees, however, notwithstanding the number of able investiga- tors they have attracted, is still in a very unsatisfactory state. The very numerous species are often distinguishable only by very minute or dubious characters, so that many of the genera are large, homo- geneous and widely distributed. Even the generic characters are often very feeble as compared with those employed by taxonomists in other Aculeate families. Hence also the higher groups, such as the tribes and subfamilies are so poorly characterized that no two melittologists agree on their limits or number. The wing venation is extraordinarily uniform throughout the whole family and the taxonomic use of the mouthparts encounters the usual difficulties which beset the employment of delicately adaptive structures. All the members of the group are of comparatively recent phylo- genetic development and very highly specialized in adaptation to the WHEELER— THE PARASITIC ACULEATA. 3 pollenation of flowering plants, themselves a group of organisms of recent origin. As manifold morphological expressions of this adaptation attention has often been called to the peculiar modifi- cation of the mouthparts for extracting nectar from flowers, the singular branched hairs of the body and modification of the hind legs or hairs on the venter in the female for carrying pollen, and the highly developed visual and olfactory organs. On the side of the instincts there are, further, the marvelous habits of nidification which have aroused the admiration of all stu- dents since the days of Reatimur. Still the general activities of the female bee — the male is, of course, an ethological nonentity as in other Aculeates — are strangely uniform in their general outlines : — the visiting of flowers, mating, nidification, provisioning the nest with pollen and honey, oviposition. But different species visit dif- ferent flowers and build their nests in different places and of different materials. All this is true of perhaps 80 per cent, of the thousands of species, but a considerable number — between 15 and 20 per cent., representing fully 70 genera — have become parasitic and have therefore ceased to collect pollen and nectar or to con- struct and provision nests, but instead seek out the nests of other bees and oviposit in their cells, with the result that the larvae reach maturity by devouring the provisions so carefully stored for their own offspring by more industrious mothers. This peculiar habit has profoundly modified the structure of the parasites. Their mouthparts have not been affected to any extent because these bees still visit flowers assiduously for food, but the collecting apparatus has atrophied and the hairs on the body and appendages have been completely or almost completely lost, so that the species have sometimes been placed in a group by themselves called Denudatas. Other peculiarities are also manifested. The loss of the collecting apparatus, which is one of the most striking secondary sexual characters of the female bee, excepting in the Prosopidinse, which swallow the pollen instead of collecting it on their hind legs or venter, has brought about a close resemblance of the sexes to one another. In a few cases the female has even taken on a male secondary sexual character, as in the genus Androgynella, recently described by Cockerell (1918). It comprises two species. 4 WHEELER— THE PARASITIC ACULEATA. detcrsa of Australia and subrixafor of the Philippines. In both species the female, though possessing a well-developed sting, has 13-jointed antennae, a number peculiar to the male in all other bees and in fact in most other Aculeates. The specimens cannot be gynandromorphs, because R. E. Turner found the 13 joints in 14 females of detersa, so that Cockerell is justified in regarding it as " certain that this is a normal condition and must represent an early stage in the evolution of a parasitic species, like those of Ccclioxys and Stelis. From the standpoint of genetics, it is an extraordinary case, since the female seems to have dropped her secondary sexual characters and thereby assumed those of the male which were pres- ent in her genetic constitution." He adds that " presumably the male of A. suhrixator cannot be distinguished from Mcgachile suhrixator," which is a common species in the Philippines and in all probability the host. Another peculiarity of the parasitic bees, to which Friese has called attention, is their often very vivid coloration. Many of the species are more or less red or yellow {Sphccodcs, Nomada, Epeo- his, etc.) or banded and spotted with patches of white or blue appressed hairs or scales {Epeolus, Crocisa, M electa, etc.), or are brilliantly metallic (Excerete, Aglac). The red color suggests that of certain myrmecophilous beetles {Eomcchusa, Hetccrius, Clavigcr, etc.) and may have a similar meaning, but it is difficult to account for the spots and bands unless we assume that they are an expres- sion of peculiarities of metabolism, associated with the active habits of the parasites, an interpretation which has also been suggested to account for the more vivid color patterns of the males as contrasted with the cospecific females of many animals. Perhaps the pecu- liar odors of certain parasitic bees, c. g., of Nomada, odors which in some cases at least seem to play a role in the relations to the host, also point to such peculiarities in metabolism. From an examination of the brains of two genera of parasitic bees, Nomada and Psithyrus, von Alten (1910) concluded that their fungiform bodies, supposed to be the seat of intelligence and therefore to correspond to our cerebral hemispheres, were more feebly developed than in the nonparasitic species. He even found that the fungiform bodies of the male parasites were relatively WHEELER— THE PARASITIC ACULEATA. 5 larger than in the females. It can hardly be claimed, however, that the parasitic bee is psychically less endowed than its host, be- cause the finding and entering of the latter's nest presupposes in- stinctive activities of a high order. Our knowledge of the habits of parasitic bees is rather meager when compared with our knowledge of the species as taxonomic units. They occur in all parts of the world, but even the hosts of many of the genera, especially of the nonholarctic forms, have not yet been ascertained. Within recent years, however, Verhoefif (1892), Hoppner (1904), and Graenicher (1905) have made some careful observations on the behavior of a few European and North American species. Verhoeff studied the activities of the Stclis minuta larva in the nests of Osjuia Icncomelcrna which are in hollow blackberry stems. The Osmia makes a row of cells in the cavity, separating them with partitions of chewed up leaves, provisions each cell with a ball of honey-soaked pollen, the socalled " bee-bread," and lays an egg on it before closing the cell and starting another. Graenicher summarizes Verhoeff's observations in the following words : " I. Stclis minuta deposits its egg earlier than the host-bee, and in the lower region of the bee-bread. 2. The larva of the parasite hatches a little earlier than that of the host-bee, whose egg is situated on top of the bee- bread. 3. Botli larvae, wliich at the beginning are of about the same size, partake of the bee-bread, the host-larva on top, the parasite below. 4. The latter gradually' increases in size, and consequently advances towards the host-larva on top. 5. Finally the parasite, which in the meanwhile has become twice as large as the host-larva, comes in contact with the latter, kills it and eats it. Verhoeff informs us that there was a mutual exchange of hostilities between the two larvae, each trying to grab the other with its mandibles, but that finally the parasite succeeded in burying its mandibles in the head of the host-larva. The latter was eaten up within i or 2 days." Hoppner's observations on the larva of Stelis ornatula in the cells of Osmia parvida and lencomelccna agree essentially with Ver- hoefif's, except that he saw no struggle between the parasitic and host larva. The former bored its way upwards through the bee- bread, sought out the Osmia larva as soon as possible and plunged its mandibles into the body of the latter without meeting with any resistance. Like Verhoefif he found the parasitic to be larger than the host larva. 6 WHEELER— THE PARASITIC ACULEATA. Graenicher's observations are more extensive. He studied in Wisconsin the parasitism of Stelis 6-maciilata on Alcidamia pro- ducta, of Coclioxys lucrosa on Megachile addenda and of Triepeo- liis helianthi on Melissodcs trinodis. In all these cases the general behavior of the parasite is very similar to that of Stelis niinuta and ornatitla, but he found that the just-hatched larva has sharp, falcate jaws, which are very large in Calioxys and Triepeolus and are re- placed by smaller jaws with the next moult, after it has killed the host larva. The first stage Triepeolus larva, moreover, has pecu- liar leg-like appendages which enable it to crawl about in the cell. We are justified, therefore, in speaking of a hypermetamorphosis in these bees, comparable to that of so many other parasitic insects (Rhipiphoridse, Strepsiptera, Meloidae, Eucharine Chalcididse, Chrysididas, Mantispidse, etc.). I quote a portion of Graenicher's account relating to the Stelis larva. "July 9, 1903. Nest collected at Milwaukee contains 4 cells. Third cell (from below) with a parasite. On top of the bee-bread an Alcidamia larva, about 3 days old. On the side of the bee-bread, about half way up a Stelis larva feeding on bee-bread. It is smaller than the host larva, and its head is directed upward, and toward the posterior end of the latter's body. " July 13. The parasitic larva has grown considerably but is not as large as the host larva. At i P.M. the parasite moves upward a short distance, comes in contact with the host larva, and secures a hold on the latter's side behind the middle of the body. The victim at first makes an effort to free itself, but offers no serious resistance. The parasite remains in the same position the whole forenoon, sucking the liquid contents of the host's body. The latter gradually perishes and shrivels. " July 14. The parasite has released its hold on the dead host larva, and is feeding on bee-bread. It has lately increased very much in size. From now on the parasite does not pay any more attention to the remains of the host. " In the cell just considered a single parasite was present, but in a nest collected at Milwaukee, July 15, 1903, a cell was come across with 3 parasitic larvae, all of them on the same side of the bee-bread as the head of the host larva. One of them was sitting above the middle, not far below the host larva, the second was lower down and directed laterally, and the third was below the second and quite close to it. In the evening the third parasite, which throughout the day (July 15) had been partaking of bee-bread and growing in length, reached the second and killed it. Four days later this same parasite killed the uppermost one and fed on its contents. Two days after this (July 21), the surviving parasite killed the host larva. Both were about equal in size." WHEELER— THE PARASITIC ACULEATA. 7 These very similar observations of Verhoeff, Hoppner and Graenicher on three very different genera of parasitic bees cast some doubt on the older and more meager observations which led Schmiedeknecht and Sharp to assume that the parasitic bee larva is merely a commensal that feeds so voraciously and grows so fast that it compels the host larva to perish from starvation. It was this assumption which led the earlier writers to call the parasites "cuckoo bees." It is possible, of course, that some parasites, e. g., Noniada, which infests the nests of Andrcna and Halictus, may conform to this older view, but renewed investigation is certainly demanded by the results of the authors I have been considering. Graenicher (1906) has also made some valuable observations which show that vision as well as odor is an important factor in the parasitic bee's method of locating the nest of the host. Speak- ing of Argyrosclenis minima, which is a parasite of Collctcs eiiloplii, he says : " It is quite evident that after having discovered the nest this parasitic bee pursued a course similar to that of a host-bee when constructing a nest. It started out to make a careful and repeated inspection of the environment of the nest, gradually covering more territory in different directions, but often returning to the nest as the main object of its attention. Being pos- sessed of a good memory for visual impressions it became acquainted with the locality within 6 minutes, and experienced no difficulty in refinding the nest at its next visit after an absence of 14 minutes. It gradually acquired a thorough familiarity with the topography of the region, and on its return to the nest it was seen to fly towards the opening as directly as the owner itself. " Such a parasitic bee when hunting for a nest of a host-bee is not always flying around in a haphazard way, trusting to its good luck in finding a nest here today, and one somewhere else tomorrow. When it has come across a suitable one it is very careful to keep this under observation, and in making its trips to and away from the nest it is directed by its visual memory in exactly the same manner as the host-bee itself. It would not be in the inter- est of such a bee to pursue a different course. The work of the host-bee in constructing a cell, and provisioning it with the food-supply must have pro- gressed to a certain point before the parasitic bee may find it suitable for the reception of the latter's egg. For this reason such a bee has to make re- peated visits to the nest, in order to be on hand when the right time comes. If it were in the habit of wandering around until it happened to come across a host-bee's cell in the proper stage of construction, then it might not get much chance to deposit an egg within its life-time of a few weeks duration, especially in rainy seasons. It is even possible that a parasitic bee has more than one nest under observation during the same period." 8 WHEELER— THE PARASITIC ACULEATA. Graenicher found the behavior of the female Tricpcohis, Ca:lioxys and Stelis to be very similar to that of Argyrosclcnis. There is one genus of bees, Sphecodcs, which must be briefly considered, because it has been the center of a prolonged contro- versy. These insects are fairly common in Europe and North Amer- ica and closely resemble the species of Halictus except in color, as they have the abdomen wholly or in part vivid red and in the hind tibiae which are very sparsely pilose and therefore suggest a degen- erate condition of the pollen-collecting apparatus. More than a century ago de Walkenaer (1817) maintained that Sphecodcs is a parasite of Halictus, and the same view was more or less emphat- ically maintained by Wesmael (1835), Lepeletier (1841) Spinola (1851), and Taschenberg (1866), but Fred. Smith (1851) and Sichel (1865) held that it nests independently. The controversy continued, however. Perkins (1887, 1889) believed that Sphecodcs might be occasionally parasitic and Friese and von Buttel-Reepen (1903) regarded it as perhaps incipiently parasitic. Rudow (1902) repeated the old statement that it nests independently. Marchal (1890, 1894) and Ferton (1890, 1898) witnessed some serious com- bats between Sphecodcs and the Halictl, whose nests it was trying to enter. Ferton (1905) saw a Sphecodcs suhquadratus breaking into the nest of Halictus malachurus. " Not being able to seize bj^ the head the sentinel bee which barred her passage, she tunneled towards the Halictus burrow and succeeded thus in seizing and kilHng the guardian, which she tossed backward out of the bur- row. A second and a third Halictus that rose in the burrow in succession to replace the first, met the same fate." Morice (1901) contended that such aggressive behavior showed that the Halictus was not a parasite, because some parasitic bees, e. g., Notnada, seem to entertain friendly relations with their hosts. Three investigators, however, have succeeded in breeding Sphe- codcs from Halictus and Andrcna nests. Breitenbach (1878) long ago took S. rubicundus from the brood-cells of Halictus 4-cinctus and Sladen (1895) found pupae of the same species in the nests of Andrcna nigroccnca and labialis. Finally Nielsen (1903) gave co- gent reasons for regarding S. gibhus as a parasite of Halictus 4-cinctus. He says : WHEELER— THE PARASITIC ACULEATA. 9 " When quickly unearthing a nest which I had seen Sphccodcs entering, I discovered it sitting in a cell nearly filled with honey. Later on I found several cells containing larvse differing from those of Halictus and which can hardly be other than those of Sphccodes. Finally I found in the autumn a cell containing a dead specimen of a fully colored Sphccodcs pupa. It is therefore proof that Sphccodcs is a cuckoo with Halictus." Nielsen calls attention to the fact that the parasitic habit of Sphccodes explains the great variations in size, puncturation, etc., which have led taxonomists to multiply species in the genus. He found that poorly nourished individuals are often only half the size of well-fed specimens. Perkins had previously noticed that small forms of Sphccodes live with small Halicti and vice versa. Sichel, after studying 3,200 specimens of European Sphccodcs, decided that they represented only three species. He sent 600 other specimens which he referred to two species to Foerster, who claimed that he could distinguish some 150 species among them, but wisely refrained from publishing descriptions. Similar varia- tions are, of course, frequent in other parasitic insects, notably in Mutillidse and in Ceropalcs. The aggressive behavior of the female Sphccodcs, which was also observed by Nielsen, suggests that she may enter Halictus cells which are already completed and destroy the egg of the host, so that her own progeny will not have to compete with the lawful owner of the bee-bread, as in the case of Stclis and the other para- sites studied by Graenicher. At any rate our knowledge of the behavior of Sphccodes is in need of further careful investigation. When commenting on the difficulties encountered by the taxo- nomic student of the bees, I omitted one of the greatest, viz., that presented by the numerous parasitic genera. In many cases these are known to be very closely related to the genera of their hosts, a fact which was noticed even by the early investigators, although its full significance became apparent only in the course of time, with the constant discovery of new species and genera in all parts of the world and with changes in the interpretation of general biological phenomena. The whole matter is so interesting that I may be pardoned for introducing some historical considerations. The more than a century devoted by entomologists to the study of bees may be conveniently divided into a pre- and a post- 10 WHEELER— THE PARASITIC ACULEATA. Darwinian period. Latreille, in a short paper, published in 1802 at the end of his remarkable volume on the habits of ants, and Kirby in the same year were the first to construct noteworthy classi- fications of bees. There was a remarkable agreement in their point of view, both dividing the family into short-tongued and long- tongued forms, subsequently called Andrenida; and Apidse, the Andrenatse and Apiaires of Latreille and the supergenera Mclitta and Apis of Kirby. The parasitic bees that were known in his day were intercalated by Latreille among the Apiaires in close proximity to their host genera. Lepeletier de St. Fargeau (1825) divided the bees into two groups, the " recoltantes," or collecting, and the "para- sites," and subdivided the former according to the dififerences in their pollen-collecting apparatus. The views of Latreille and Lepe- letier have dominated the classification of bees down to the present time. Certain German melittologists, notably Schmiedeknecht and Friese, have followed Lepeletier's scheme, whereas Westwood (1840) and most subsequent workers have agreed with Latreille. As Westwood's reasons are still interesting and include a good statement of the pre-Darwinian or special creation conception of the relations of the parasite to the host, I quote some of his re- marks : " Indeed it is to be observed that the variation in the structure of the species, thus varjang in their habits, does not seem to warrant the establish- ment of them into separate famihes. This circumstance appears naturally dependent upon tw^o considerations: ist, it is essential that the parasite in its perfect state should possess a certain resemblance to the animal in the nest of which it deposits its eggs, so as to deceive the latter and its associates (Kirby in a footnote here calls attention to the resemblance of the Dipteron VoluccUa to Bombus) ; and 2d, the nature of the food of both being similar, the variation in structure is much less striking than if the parasite were car- nivorous, as the Ichneumonidae, and the animal attacked (as the caterpillars of Lepidoptera, etc.) herbivorous. The parasitic connection indeed goes no further than this, viz., that the larva of the parasite eats up the food of its fosterer, and so starves it to death ; the larvae of both are therefore pol- lenivorous, and the dififerences which will naturally be most striking, will con- sequently be found in those organs which are emploj'ed in the construction and provisioning of the nest of the working species, and which one may therefore expect to find in a less developed state than in those species wiiich, from being parasitic, do not require their full development. Hence it is that we find the general structure of the parasitic bee closely resembling that of the bee, at the expense of whose young its own are destined to be WHEELER— THE PARASITIC ACULEATA. 11 nourished; and hence, if we regard Bojiibus and Psithyrus of St. Fargeau, Aglae and Euglossa, Mclccta and Anthophora, or Sphccodcs and Halictus, with reference to their general structure, they will be found most intimately allied; whilst if, on the other hand, we regard such portion of their economy is is connected with the formation and provisioning of their nests, it will be requisite to place them in different divisions. If we observe, however, the great variation existing among bees in this portion of their economy, it is evident that this cannot be regarded as a normal or typical character and that a distribution founded thereupon would necessarily be unnatural." The publication of the " Origin of Species " could not fail to have its efifect on the students of bees. In the light of evolution the parasitic species acquired a new meaning, for it was at once apparent that their resemblance to their hosts might have a genetic significance. One of the first to fall under the spell of the new conception was Hermann Miiller (1871). He believed that the genus PsifJiynis was of rather recent descent from its host genus Bomhus, that Melecta and Crocisa were less recently descended from Anthophora, and that the phylogenetic origin of Stelis, Cocli- oxys, Epeolus and Nomada was still more remote, although the derivation of Stelis and Ca^Iioxys from gastrilegid genera seemed clear. He was guided to these conclusions by a study of the an- tennae. Referring to a table of the genera of bees he says: "An examination of this table shows that in all nonparasitic bees, with- out exception, the males have a shorter scape but a longer flagel- lum than the females, but that in some pronounced cuckoo-bees the very reverse is the case." Smell not only guides the males to the females, but also the parasites to their hosts and hence the olfac- tory organs of the female parasites must be highly developed. " A glance at the development of the male and female olfactory organs of the cuckoo-bees clearly supports the conclusion that in the an- tennae of the females the adaptations for working in the brood- chambers have been lost pari passu with an increase in the olfactory organs and that these developments correspond in degree to the period of time at which the transition to a parasitic life took place." I am not aware that any study of the antennae and their sense- organs has since been undertaken with a view to testing the correct- ness of Miiller's conclusions. Allusion has already been made to Graenicher's discovery that the vision of the parasitic bees is an important factor in locating the nests of the host. 12 WHEELER— THE PARASITIC ACULEATA. In 1883 Perez published an important study of the parasitic bees and republished his general conclusions in a separate article in 1884. After careful morphological investigation he concluded that the parasitic genera must have evolved from the host genera and was able in a few instances to point out the very species from which the parasitic genus had originated. He recognized four distinct lines of development from as many host genera: Pskhyrus from Bombus, Sfelis from Anthidium, Ccclioxys and Dioxys from Mega- chile and Sphecodes from Halictiis. The series of genera known as the Nomadinae and comprising Epeolus, Melecta, Crocisa, Am- mohatcs, Pasitcs, Philcrcmus, Biastcs and Nomada, he derived from Ccclioxys on the supposition that this genus had given rise to a whole series of parasitic forms which had acquired new hosts among the various genera of recoltant bees. He contended that Latreille's example in placing the parasitic genera next to their host genera should be followed in any attempt at a natural classification of the Apidae. The truth of his contention has since been conceded and is clearly expressed in the classifications of Ashmead ( 1899) , Robert- son (1899) and Cockerell (1910). Dalla Torre (1896) and Friese in his work on the African bees (1909), however, adopt a com- promise between the views of Latreille and Lepeletier, dividing the bees into podilegid, gastrilegid and social sections and appending to each a series of parasitic genera. Of the classifications I have seen Robertson's seems to be the most natural, but he is dealing with a limited fauna, in which the relations of the parasitic genera are few and fairly well known, whereas Dalla Torre and Friese, in an attempt to deal with the bees of remote regions or of the whole world and with dozens of imperfectly known parasitic gen- era, have some justification for the course they adopt. It is evi- dent, nevertheless, that no satisfactory classification can be con- structed till the precise affinities of all the parasitic genera to one another and to the host genera have been thoroughly elucidated. The phylogenetic relationships even among the European and North American parasitic bees are still in part very problematical. Probably all agree that Psithyrus must be derived from Bombus, Stelis from Anthidium (scnsu lafo), and Ccclioxys from Mcgachilc, or some closely related, now extinct, genus. But the origin of the WHEELER— THE PARASITIC ACULEATA. 13 Nomadine series is by no means clear. Friese in his earlier work (1889) could not decide whether it was to be derived from Cocli- oxys, as Perez suggested, or from a form like Eucera. To-day even such an alternative seems too simple, for in all probability the long series of " Nomadine " genera now known consists of several heterophyletic groups. M electa and Epeoliis are derived from A)i- tJwphora by Robertson and others, and Saunders and Robertson would derive Nomada from Andrena, whereas such genera as Am- mobates, Biastes, Pasites and Phiariis are now supposed by Friese ( 1916) to be connected with Megachilc through genera like Cccsarea and Paraccclioxys, the last being also the source of Ccclioxys and of Dioxys and Paradioxys through the genus Prodioxys. Among the exotic parasitic genera it seems clear that some have arisen from host genera very dififerent from those above mentioned. Thus there is every reason to suppose that Thalestria has arisen from Oxcea, Agla'e and Exccrete from Euglossa, Eucondylops from Allodape, Peresia from Osmia. It will be seen, therefore, that even if we make all due allow- ance for dubious cases there still remain a number in which the closest morphological affinity of the parasitic is with its host genus. This is evident from the accompanying table (Table I.) in which the most clearly established cases (fully 50 per cent.) are marked with an asterisk. In constructing this table I have profited by a number of valuable suggestions kindly communicated by Professor Cockerell. We must assume, I believe, that in some cases the primitive host genera are now extinct, that in some cases, there- fore, the parasites have come to infest species of genera to which they have no morphological affinity, that many parasites are directly derived from other parasitic genera and that in some cases the phenomena of parasitic convergence are so pronounced and oblit- erate or obscure the generic affinities to such a degree that they can be elucidated only by the most painstaking study. For my imme- diate purposes, however, the present results will suffice, since they agree with the conditions in other groups of Aculeata, as will be shown in the sequel. In marked contrast with the bees, the solitary wasps comprise few parasitic species, if we exclude the Mutillidae, which I am not 14 WHEELER— THE PARASITIC ACULEATA. TABLE I. Genera of Parasitic Bees. Parasites. Hosts. Ancestral Genus. *Nomada Andrcna, Halictus, Encera, Collctcs, Panurgus Andrcna. *Sphecodcs Halictus Halictus. *Parhalictus ( ^Halictus Halictus. *Chlerogas {?)Thrinchostoma Thrinchostoma. *Mclecta Anthophora Anthophora. *Bombomclccta ( ?) Anthophora Anthophora. *Ericrocis ( ?) Anthophora Anthophora. *Crocisa Anthophora Anthophora. *Protomelissa ( ?) Anthophora Anthophora. *Melissa ( ?) Anthophora Anthophora. Epcolus Collctcs Anthophora. Tricpcolus Melissodcs, Tctralonia Epcolus. Argyrosclcnis Collctcs Epcolus. *Epcoloidcs Macropis Macropis. *Lciopodus Melitoma Melitoma. Osiris (f) Tetrapedia Tetrapedia. Rhathymus ( ?)Epicharis Epicharis. Mesochcira {?) Ccntris Crocisa. Acanthopus Ccntris {?)Ccntris. Eurytus Ccntris ( .?) Ccntris. Mesonychium Melitoma Acanthopus. *Aglae Euglossa Euglossa. *Exaerete Euglossa Euglossa. *Peresia Osmia Osmia. *Eucondylops -illodapc 41lodape. *Stelis Anthidiuni, Chalicodoina, Heriadcs, Osmia, Ceratina, Alcidamia, Chilos- toma -Inthidium. Parcvapis Mcgachilc Stclis. Euaspis Mcgachilc Stclis. *Thalcstria O.vcca Oxcca. *Androgynclla Mcgachilc Mcgachilc. *Coelioxys Mcgachilc, ( ?) Anthophora Mcgachilc. Dioxys Osmia, Chalicodoma Mcgachilc. Pasitcs Nomia, Camptopccuni Ammobatcs. Ammobatcs .Anthophora, Macroccra, Saropoda.. . Cccsarca. Biastes Systropha Ammobatcs. Phiarus Mcliturga Ammobatcs. Holcopasitcs ( ?)Calliopsis Anunobatcs. Orcopasites Spinoliclla Anunobatcs. Philcrcmus Rhophitcs, Halict aides Pasitcs. Herbstiella ( ?)Psanythia Pasitcs. *Psithyrus B ambus Bombus. WHEELER— THE PARASITIC ACULEATA. 15 including in my survey. The following are the only cases I have found in the literature. According to Ferton (1901) the Gorytid Nysson diiiiidiafits is a parasite of Gorytcs elcgans. The latter digs its burrow in the sand and provisions it with larval and adult Hem- iptera; the N\sson finds it and often enters it during the absence of the Gorvtes. If the latter happens to be at home the Nysson waits motionless about a dozen centimeters away, with its head turned towards the nest, till the Gorytcs departs. Adlerz (1910) observed very similar behavior on the part of Nysson maculatus towards Gorytcs lunatus. Apparently both species of Nysson de- stroy the Gorytcs egg attached to the prey and lay their own in its place. In 1887, at a time when nothing was known of the parasitic habits of Nysson, Handlirsch called attention to the superficial re- semblance of some of the species to parasitic bees. Williams (1913) and the Raus (1918) have described an inter- esting sporadic case of parasitism in Sticus unicinctns, a wasp be- longing to a very different family, the Bembicidse. The Stiziis digs its way into the nest of a Sphecid, Chlorion thomcr, after the latter has provisioned it with a cricket, oviposited and closed the entrance. After the Bembicid has entered the chamber it devours the Chlorion egg and deposits its own so that the larva can have the cricket all to itself. This case is extraordinary because the other species of Stisns {S. tridcns and crrans) , whose habits have been studied by Fabre (1886) and Ferton (1899, 1908, 1910, 191 1), dig their own burrows in the sand, glue their egg to the bottom of the cell and feed the hatching larva continuously with Hemiptera after the man- ner of other Bembicids (Bicyrtcs). Ferton has also observed similar behavior in S. gazagnairci and fcrtoni. According to the same observer (1899, 1901, 1908) S. fasciatns feeds its young with immature crickets. Our American Stizus with the exception of unicinctns, seem to have similar habits. During the summer of 1 91 7 I saw a flourishing colony of a small undetermined species near Tempe, Arizona. It comprised thousands of individuals, all nesting close together in the sand, like Bcmhix. The remaining parasitic wasps belong to the family Psammo- charidse (Pompilidse), all of which prey on spiders. In two of his papers (1890, 1891) Ferton has shown that some individuals of 16 WHEELER— THE PARASITIC ACULEATA. Pompilus rufipes (now called Psammo chares) have acquired the habit of robbing other individuals of their prey which they then bury and furnish with an egg. They even wage fierce battles for one another's spiders. These observations acquire added interest in connection with another very closely related species, P. pectinipcs, which, according to Ferton (1901, 1902, 1905), enters the sealed nests of P. rufipes, eats its tgg and deposits its own on the spider. Ferton was thus led to advance the opinion that we hav2 in pecti- nipes a parasite that has just become detached phylogenetically from its host species. " The parasitic habit," he says, " would therefore appear to have been built up in the following manner : P. rufipes, living in colonies, has acquired the habit of stealing the prey of its neighbor and even of fighting for the possession of prey not its own. Some individuals finally learned to steal the spiders that had been buried, either by driving away the rightful owner while she was sealing her burrow, or by ferreting through the soil occupied by the colony in search of sealed burrows. Their descendants, inheriting this habit, gave up constructing a nest and transporting the stolen prey to it and left it in the cell where it was discovered, simply substituting their egg for the one it bore. Thus P. pcctinipes was evolved, scarcely distinct from the maternal stock in many of its anatomical characters but become a parasite on the spe- cies from which it arose." In Sweden Adlerz (1910, 1912) found that P. campestris ex- hibits a similar parasitism on P. unguicularis and P. acitleatits on P. rufipes and funiipennis, and Ferton (1891) has shown that P. viaticus and pulcher resemble rufipes in their habit of appropriating the prey of other individuals of their own species. Finally we have among the Psammocharids a distinct and pecu- liar genus, Ceropalcs, all the species of which are parasites on other genera of the family. Lepeletier (1827) was the first to regard Ceropales as a parasite, but Walsh was the first to breed it from the nest of another Psammocharid. Riley and Walsh (1869), in their paper on wasps and their habits, state that a male Ceropales, which they described under the name C. rufiventris, but which is now known as C. robinsoni Cresson, emerged from a mud cell that had been constructed and provisioned by Agenia homhycina. That they were fully aware of the importance of this observation is clear from the following remark: WHEELER— THE PARASITIC ACULEATA. 17 " The inference is unavoidable — more especially as we had previously bred very numerous specimens of the same little mud-dauber from the same kind of mud-cells obtained in northern Illinois — that this gaily dressed Spider wasp (Ccropalcs) had sometime in the summer of 1867, laid an egg in one of the five mud cells found in south Illinois, and thus appropriated to the use of its future larva the supply of food laid up by the provident care of the unfortunate, dingy looking little mud-dauber for its own offspring. Otherwise it is impossible to account for two distinct kinds of wasp hatching out from the same lot of mud cells." Perez (1894) and Ferton (1897) made some very interesting observations in France on the behavior of Ccropales maciilata and cribrata, showing that these wasps are parasitic on various species of Psammochares and Aporus, and Adlerz (1902) has succeeded in giving us a complete accoimt of the behavior of C. maculata as he observed it in Sweden. This behavior is so interesting, especially in connection with Graenicher's observations on the parasitic bees, that I subjoin a translation of the German resume of the paper: " Ccropalcs has the habit of visiting the breeding grounds of Pompilus species and there alights on small eminences of the soil in order to spy on the Pompilids while they are dragging in. their paralyzed spiders. The tense atti- tude of the wasp, her deflected antennae and her movements as she turns towards a Pompilid that has just come within the range of her vision, are indicative of her keen interest. As Perez and Ferton have observed, the Ccropalcs either alights on the spider while it is being borne along by the Pompilus, unobserved by the latter, or on a spider that is lying unguarded in the open or concealed above the ground, while its captor is busy digging her nest. In either case the Ccropalcs can be seen bending the tip of her abdomen under the spider for the evident purpose of ovipositing. Ferton saw a Ccropalcs cribrata follow a Pouipilus chalybeatus into her burrow while she was dragging in a spider, but although a Ccropalcs larva was afterwards found on the prey, it is not certain that the egg was laid on this occasion. As will be seen from what follows, it might have been laid pre- viously. The only time I saw a Ccropalcs enter a Pompilus burrow was when a P. niger was still busy excavating. No spider was therefore on hand and, of course, oviposition could not have occurred. It was merely a sign of impatience on the part of the parasite, which, after persistently watching the digger, stole down into the burrow as if to inspect the progress of the work. I was present also on a second exceptional occasion when a Ccropalcs pounced down with such violence on a P. cinctellus with its spider that the two wasps and the spider tumbled about together. The little P. cinctellus was so dismayed that she flew away in great haste and never returned. On this occasion the egg which the Ccropalcs probably laid during her subse- quent tedious manipulation of the spider must have perished, because the spider was left in the open where it was exposed to ants and other predatory PROC. AMER. PHIL. SOC. VOL. LVIII, B, JUNE II, I919. 18 WHEELER— THE PARASITIC ACULEATA. insects. That the Poinpilus suspects the hostile intentions of the Ceropales is clear from the behavior of a P. viaticus that hid with her spider among the dense grass-blades of a road-side and would not venture into the open because she was being watched by two female Ceropales each perched on a grass-blade, stretching its antennse downward and edging nearer from time to time. The angry Pompilus finally gave chase to the parasites and only after they had flown away did she leave her concealment with her prey. "When a spider on which a Ceropales has just alighted is examined, the egg cannot be seen at first because it is placed in such an unsuspected spot. At the base of the ventral surface of the abdomen the spider has two slit-shaped stigmata which open into the lung-books. The wasp inserts her egg into one of these. The stigmata look like pockets, with very closely fit- ting flaps. After the egg is in place the orifice of the pocket sometimes gapes slightly so that one end of the egg can be seen. This is apt to be the case in Drassodes, but in the large Lycosids the pockets are so capacious that they completely conceal the egg. The place is obviously selected be- cause in it the egg is perfectly protected when the spider is later dragged into the burrow by its rightful owner, for it is evident that if the egg were merely attached to the surface, it would be exposed to serious injury while the spider is being drawn through the narrow burrow. The last abdominal segment of the female Ceropales, which is constructed like a short, flat, truncated ovipositor — a structure vmique among the solitary wasps — evidently represents an adaptation to the narrow, slit-shaped stigmata, since the latter can be opened by means of such an instrument and the egg inserted. Not infrequently I have seen an egg in each of the lung-books of the same spider. Since the Pompilus later attaches its own tgg to the side of the spider's abdomen, the situation becomes very complicated, as there are then three rival claimants for the same spider which is sufficient food for only one. A few successful breeding experiments have revealed the drama that is subse- quently enacted in the dark burrow. " After an embrj'onic period of two to three days, the Ceropales larva hatches. Its anterior portion, as far back as the tenth segment, extends straight out from the stigma, while its posterior portion remains concealed in the lung-book. Soon the exposed portion is seen to bend downward till the head touches the spider's belly and the larva begins to feed. As soon as the Ceropales in the other lung-book hatches the older larva evidently smells a rival, for it stops feeding, stretches itself out and moves its anterior end freely about in the air in the direction of its competitor. The latter is at first out of reach, but as soon as the older larva has fed and grown suffi- ciently in length it attacks its younger companion, which is quite unable to escape its fate. After its cannibal feast the Ceropales larva again bends down and continues to devour the spider. Not till several days have elapsed does the Pompilus larva hatch, although the egg was laid not more than a few hours after the Ceropales egg. When the Pompilus larva begins to grow the Ceropales larva becomes aware of a new rival and turns in its direction. When a little later it has grown sufficiently to reach the Pompilus larva, the latter's fate, too, is scaled. With the elimination of its last com- WHEELER— THE PARASITIC ACULEATA. 19 petitor the Ccropales larva turns again to the spider and devours it com- pletely except for a few unassimilable remnants. Then the larva weaves a network of pale brown threads among which on the following day it spins a pale brown cocoon. In one case which I observed the feeding period of the larva extended over a period of 12 days." It will be seen that the general ovttlines of the behavior of the solitary parasitic bees and wasps are strikingly similar. Among the wasps we can recognize two types, that of Nysson, Stisus unicinctus and Psammochares pectinipes and that of C^ro/'o/^.y, whereas in bees only a single type, bearing a great resemblance to that of Ccropales, is known. It is probable, nevertheless, as I have indicated above, that the Nysson type may be represented among the bees by SpJic- codcs. The two types are shown in the accompanying diagrams in which the main activities of the parasite and its host are repre- sented in parallel series. Nysson. Nyssoji Mating Finding Host Nest Goryfes Mating Nidification, Provisioning, Oviposition. Destroying Host Egg Ovipositing Larva Appropriating Prey. Ccropales. Ccropales Mating Finding Host and Prey, Ovipositing. Psammochares Mating Provisioning, Nidification Larva feeding. . . .Killing Host Larva. . . .Appropriating Prey. Oviposition Larva feeding Stelis. Stelis Flower visiting Mating Finding Host Nest, Ovipositing. Alcidamia Flower visiting Mating Nidification, Provisioning Larva feeding Killing Host Larva Appropriating Food. Ovipositing. . . .Larva feeding In all the cases the parasite takes possession of the food-supply (prey or bee-bread) by eliminating the egg or young larva to which it belongs as a result of the activities of the host, but this elimina- tion may be effected in two ways, either by the adult or by the larval parasite. In the Nysson type the mother appropriates the prey and bequeaths it to her offspring, in the Ceropales-Stelis type the larval 20 WHEELER— THE PARASITIC ACULEATA. parasite seizes the prey or food for itself, or, regarding the situation merely from the standpoint of the individual life-history of the parasite, we may say that it is predacious either in its first larval stage or as an adult on the egg or young larva of the host. The host egg or larva constitutes an obstacle to the parasite's enjoyment of the prey or bee-bread, and as the parasite is a true ir>sect bol- shevik and member of the I. W. W. its life purpose is completely expressed in the impudent imperative : " Get out, I want your place." Nor is it surprising that long before the Russian Soviets the parasitic wasps and bees had learned that the quickest way to remove a living obstacle is to kill it. There is some difificulty in deciding which of the two types of parasitism represented in the diagrams is the more primitive. Prob- ably the more aggressive Nysson type was the earlier as indicated by the behavior of Psammochares rufipcs and pcctinipcs. On this supposition the role of assassin, directed not only against the host larva, but also against any competing larva of its own species, was acquired later by the larval parasite as a result of neglect on the part of the mother to destroy the egg of the host. The same type of behavior, however, is also seen in many other insects when more than one egg is laid by the mother in a very limited supply of food, e. g., among the larval egg-parasites (Proctotrupids) and the cater- pillars that live in the heads of composite flowers (Rabaud, 1912, 1914). In the larval egg-parasites the large, sickle-shaped jaws are beautifully adapted for the purpose of killing competing indi- viduals of the same species, and the similar mandibles described by Graenicher in larval bees of the genera Stelis, C(rlioxys and Tric- pcoliis are equally useful in destroying both the competitors of the same species and the host larva. The social parasites are most abundantly represented and have been most extensively studied among the ants. The literature on the subject is so voluminous that I am unable to deal with it here. Much of it is cited in my ant book (1910), where the subject is con- sidered in greater detail, and in the first volume of W'asmann's " Gesellschaftsleben der Ameisen " (1915). As would be expected, the conditions become very complex when a social organism such as a colony of ants becomes parasitic on another colony. Among WHEELER— THE PARASITIC ACULEATA. 21 the parasitic relationships four types can be recognized. One of these, corresponding to Wasmann's category of " compound colo- nies " is represented by a number of small species which live in little nests that communicate with the nests of the host by tenuous galleries. The two species bring up their brood separately, but the workers consort with one another freely and amicably in the gal- leries and chambers of the host. The relations of parasite and host, where they have been determined, are much like those exhibited between certain ants and their myrmecophiles (symphiles). The most typical of these guest ants is our North American Leptothorax cmcrsoni, the behavior of which I have elsewhere described in de- tail. From the accompanying table (Table III.), in which all the known guest ants and their hosts are listed, it will be seen that none of the former is congeneric with its host. Emery's statement ( 1909 ) , however, that : " The myrmecophilous ants are not derived from forms allied to their host species, but from other genera or even from other subfamilies," is not strictly true, though in all proba- bility the guest-ants have developed, as he contends, from preda- tory thief-ants, of which quite a number of species are known to nest in the walls of the nests of termites and larger ants and to prey on their brood. The three other types of parasitism, representing Wasmann's category of " mixed colonies," are the slave-makers, temporary and permanent social parasites, which agree in living so intimately with their host in the same nest that the two species bring up their broods in common. The differences between the three types is, however, very striking when we follow the development of the parasitic colony, although it is founded in every case by a single recently fecundated female, or queen, that succeeds in entering and estab- lishing herself in the nest of the host species. The queen slave- maker, at least in species like Formica sangiiinea, breaks into the host nest and appropriates and fiercely defends a portion of the host brood till it matures and surrounds her with a number of loyal workers, which are then able to rear the brood hatching from her eggs. The workers produced by such a queen have the extraordi- nary habit of making periodical, organized raids during the summer months on other colonies of the host species (usually Formica 22 WHEELER-THE PARASITIC ACULEATA. -; vj to 2 ^ t^ t' ~ V V Q ^ Q ffi y CJ O O O U (J u ■:p '^ 'jn '-2 'i^ •- -2 '-' s o o u l-H < w ^ hJ y CQ H < tn H OS < Ph ^ l-) "! S "^ ■^ Q 5^ s « -§ .^ ^ s ? V S V V C ^ a « 03 2 S ? - I' i* V* v^ '** ^ ^ ^ « « i 2 E -E r; V V V V V V. 2 o o <^ ^ ^ ^ 55 ■* "S S ■£ "S S < iS, S, ^ fi. f^ o kJ k4 kJ kJ k4 -^ ffi _o .O (J o tJ _o _o w < O O <-S "^ ^- ft"^ K* N .-5^ ^ rt w o !^ Co ?-> ^. t-j :2; :^ o, o, a. U ;^ :^ rt 03 ^_ _- ^ --• •-- (U W o3 o3 rt 03 03 ;z; ;z; CL, Cl, cu Ph Ph Oi " w K to ^ "^ ^ 2 I c fc; e « e a H •^ s o ~ S H S 2 ^ 2 i^ X :§ ^ ti. ^ Q^.. ^ w =: "42 fi »- b ^ s V "-« ^ .„ . a a o ^ li. (i. Cin u. WHEELER— THE PARASITIC ACULEATA. 23 fusca or one of its varieties), and of carrying their larvse and pupae home and permitting a certain number of them to hatch as " slaves," so that the colony is maintained as an intimate mixture of two spe- cies, at least for a considerable period. The queen Polycrgus, however, kills the queen of the host colony whose nest she enters and is adopted by the workers, and the slave-making, or dulotic raids of her offspring are even more perfectly organized than in sangninca, since Polycrgus in all its phases depends absolutely on the slaves, or host workers for its food, the rearing of its young and the construction of the common nest. It will be noticed from the table (Table IV.) that all the slave-making, or dulotic parasites belong either to the same genera as their hosts or to closely allied genera, though the latter represent two different subfamilies. The recently fecundated queen of the temporary social para- sites belonging to Formica species of the rufa, microgyna and ex- secta groups, Bothriomyrmex, Lasius umhratiis and fuliginosus or some species of Aphccnogaster, enters the nest of the host in a con- ciliatory or at any rate non-aggressive manner, and after being adopted by the workers, supplants the host queen, when she is killed either by her own workers or by the parasite, which then proceeds to produce her own brood to be reared by the host workers. The offspring of the parasite, however, are not slave-makers, so that the host workers gradually die off, leaving a pure and eventually flour- ishing colony of the intrusive species. As shown in the table (Ta- ble v.), all the temporary social parasites belong to the same genera as their hosts, although these genera represent at least three differ- ent subfamilies. The queen of the permanent social parasites enters the host col- ony in the same insinuating and conciliatory manner as the tem- porary social parasite and is definitively adopted in the same man- ner after the host queen has been eliminated, but the rate of devel- opment of the parasitic brood is very rapid, so that adult males and females are produced within the lifetimes of the host workers. This development of the sexual forms is the more accelerated be- cause the worker caste has disappeared among the permanent social parasites, which represent the culmination, or, more properly speaking, the level of the greatest "degeneration" (specialization) 24 WHEELER— THE PARASITIC ACULEATA. o i V; H Q o o o '5 'S '5 'S "S -h-c^-c^-c^C V V 5^ V K '-P '-w (J 'V . y u -^ .^ < < Oh 1-^ b w ID Q i s g 2 2 k4 < o o S •1 1 iz; ^j Vj s ^ e «o <-3 3 •-i <; *- ji v» H % _s is. 2 g 1- 7?. ^ ■« S :S •S 5 .2 2 .2 S o Ci o ~ 5 S •b X ^ ^ i; hI. s^ '■J '^j '^ '^ <5 . O K, ^ ^ ^ ti, Cl. t. [i, li. Oh <-) Q. ^ .a 5^ "P e « r ? S V) a o .- .;i o S S <, J) J> I B B i i ^ o *^ *^ ^ *^■ <2 ? H e « c> "2l o o U, )< V 13 ~ S K ^ ^ "^ '-I '-^ ^-> 5 S r r '-- € u s c; -c; "t; "^ =: :^ ^ ^ ^ 2 rF^'sS'-J'^'o' fj -- ~ i? ^ --^ V C ^ -^ *«? s e e t CX<^^L)UF~H>^'^ a y _o _rt c 'c .y .y rt O ■^ '^ u u o Q ;-. V. O o 03 03 OJ (U OJ • - i: u o ••-. O ni o3";=^JiiJi; 03^^ iU(U CIh ►J w < o < H » s * *- « fe b h V t5 -a 5 2 "^ ^ 2, § §> 5> 2 ^ o^« ^ '^ s ^ ~ .e "S 'S O ■^ 5^2 2 _s S "5 ^ ^ C ■*-- "^ jSt- ^- s^ V c (^ ^ w u to f^ 2 -S ^ -J t. 5- .~a Z .« « i^ S b A, Q s a "2 2 s: '^ ^ si *: a Si ?: s -Q ni. ^ s^ • — ^ ^ = I g 1 g 2 -g to s ^ »- '^ »* '■^ ^ -^ ~^ '^ 'o -^ t? t? < w hJ w m H < W H < 04 < lin Ph o s s s s s ^;^_'T3^_"«_"Q o o o O Ci o ~ ^f-H " 1 ! i I • I ! I ! ! ! ! ! I Sh . "e B ^ . ~ s s • ~ v! '^ ^ Co tq a, Co ^ "Q .«a _«u _'a ~ -L' '^ ? S "o *^ ~ it. Tidskr., 25, 1904, pp. 121-129. 1910-12. Adlerz, G. Lefnadsforhallanden och Instinkter inom Familjerna Pompilidse och Sphegidae III. and IV. K. Svcnska Vctcnsk. Handl., 45, No. 12, 1910, pp. 5-75; 47, 1912, No. ID, pp. 5-61. 1910. von Alten, H. Zur Phylogenie des Hymenopterengehirns. Jen. Zcit- sclir. Naturw., 46, 1910, pp. 511-590, 4 pis., 28 text-figs. 1899. Ashmead, W. H. Classification of the Bees, or the Superfamily Apoidea. Trans. Amcr. Ent. Soc. 26. 1899, pp. 49-100. 1916. Bequaert, J. On the Occurrence of Vcspa austriaca Panzer in the Northeastern United States. Bull. Brooklyn Ent. Soc, 11, 1916, pp. 101-107. 1902. Brauns, H. Eucondylops n. g. Apidarum. Zcitschr. Hym. Dipt., 6. 1902, pp. 377-380. 1878. Breitenbach, W. Ueber Halictus 4-cinctiis F. und Sphccodcs gibbiis L. Stcft. Ent. Zeitg., 1878, pp. 241-243. 1912. Brun, R. Weitere Beitrage zur Frage der Koloniegriindung bei den Ameisen, mit besonderer Beriicksichtigung der Phylogenese des sozialen Parasitismus und der Dulosis bei Formica. Biol. Ccntralbh, 32, 1912, pp. 154-180, 216-226. 1903. von Buttel-Reepen, H. Die Stammesgeschichtliche Entstehung des Bienenstaates. Leipzig, 1903. 1903. Carpenter, G. H., and D. R. Pack-Beresford. The Relationship of Vcspa austriaca and Vespa rufa. Ent. Month. Mag.. (2), 14, 1903, pp. 230- 242, I pi. 1902. Cockerel!, T. D. A. Coiitril)utions from the New Mexico Biological Station. — XII. On some Genera of Bees. .];;;;. Mag. Xat. Hist., (7), 9, 1902, pp. 230-234. 1906. Cockerell, T. D. A. The Bees of Florissant. Bull. Amcr. Mus. Nat. Hist., 22, 1906, pp. 419-455, 2 figs. WHEELER— THE PARASITIC ACULEATA. 37 1908. Cockerell, T. D. A. Notes on the Bee-Genus Exaerete. Psyche, Apr., 1908, pp. 41-42. 1910. Cockerell, T. D. A. An Introduction to the Study of Rocky Mountain Bees. Univ. Colo. Studies, 7, 1910, pp. 179-195, 50 figs. 1916. Cockerell, T. D. A. Some Neotropical Parasitic Bees. Eiit. Nczvs, 27, 1916, pp. 208-210. 1918. Cockerell, T. D. A. The MegachiHd Bees of the Philippine Islands. Philip. Jouru. Sci.. 13, 1918, pp. 127-144. 1919. Cockerell, T. D. A. A New Genus of Bees from Peru. Eiit. Nczvs, 30, 1919, pp. 17-18. 191 5. Crawford, J. C. The Bee Genus Holcopasitcs Ashmead. his. Ins. Mens., 3, 1915, pp. 123-126. 1916. Crawford, J. C. Some New American Hymenoptera. Ins. Ins. Mens., 4. 1916, pp. I3.S-I44- 1896. de Dalla Torre, C. G. Catalogus Hymenopterorum 10, Apidse. Leip- zig, Engelmann, 1896. 1872. Drory, E. Quelques Observations sur la Melipone {Mclipona scutcl- laris). Bordeaux, 1872. 1906. Ducke, A. Neue Beobachtungen fiber die Bienen der Amazonaslander. Zcitschr. f. wiss. Insekth., 2, 1906, pp. 51-60. 1912. Ducke, A. Die natiirlichen Bienengenera Siidamerikas. Zool. Jahrb. Abth. Syst., 34, 1912, pp. 51-116. 1909. Emery, C. Intorno all'origine delle Formiche dulotiche, parassitiche e mirmecofile. Rend. R. Accad. Sci. Bologna, 1909, pp. 36-51, Germ. Trans, in Biol. Centralbi, 29, 1909, pp. 352-362. 1890. Fabre, J. H. Souvenirs Entomologiques 3, 2d edition. Delagrave, Paris, 1890. 1890. Ferton, Ch. L'evolution de I'instinct chez les Hymenopteres. Rev. Scicnf., 1890, pp. 45, 496-498. 1891. Ferton, Ch. Notes pour servir a I'histoire de I'instinct de Pompilides. Act. Soc. Linn. Bordcau.v, 44, 1891, pp. 281-294. 1897. Ferton, Ch. Nouvelles Observations sur I'instinct des Pompihdes. Act. Soc. Linn. Bordcau.v, 52, 1897, pp. 101-132. 1901-1911. Ferton, Ch. Notes detachees sur I'instinct des H3mienopteres Melliferes et Ravisseurs. Ann. Soc. Ent. France, ist series, 70, 1901, pp. 83-148, 3 pis. ; 2d series, ibid., yi, 1902, pp. 499-529, i pi. ; 3d series, ibid., 74, 1905, pp. 56-104, 2 pis. ; 4th series, ibid., 77, 1909, PP- 535-586, I fig. ; 5th series, ibid., 78, 1909, pp. 401-422 ; 6th series, ibid., 79, 1910, pp. 145-178; 7th series, ibid., 80, 1911, pp. 351-412, 7 figs. 1914. Ferton, Ch. Perezia maura Genre d'Apiaires Parasites d'Algerie et Observations sur ce Genre. Ann. Soc. Ent. Soc. France, 83, 1914, pp. 22,2,-22,7, I fig. 1908. Fletcher, J. Notice of a paper entitled " Is Vcspa borcalis an Inqui- line?" Ann. Ent. Soc. America, i, 1908, p. 30. 1899. Friese, H, Die Schmarotzerbienen und ihre Wirte. Zool. Jahrb. Abt. Syst., 3, 1889, pp. 847-870. 38 WHEELER— THE PARASITIC ACULEATA. 1891. Friese, H. Beitrage zur Biologie der soHtaren Blumenwespen (Apidae). Zool. Jahrb. Abth. Syst., 5, 1891, pp. 751-860, i pi. 1895. Friese, H. Die Bienen Europas. I. Schmarotzerbienen. Berlin, Fried- lander, 1895. 1909. Friese, H. Die Bienen Afrikas nach dem Stande unserer heutigen Kenntnisse. Zool. Anthr. Ergeb. cincr Forschtmgsrcisc tin ijccstl. u. zcntr. Sildafrika, 2, 1909, pp. 85-475, 2 pis. 1914. Friese, H. Neue Bienenarten der orientalischen Region. Deutsch. Ent. Zeitschr., 1914, pp. 320-324. 1906. Forel, A. Moeurs des Fourmis Parasites des Genres Whcclcria et Bothriomyrmex. Rev. Suisse Zool., 14, 1906, pp. 51^69. 1905. Graenicher, S. Some Observations on the Life-History and Habits of Parasitic Bees. Bull. Wis. Nat. Hist. Sac, 3, 1905, pp. 153-167, I pi. 1906. Graenicher, S. A Contribution to our Knowledge of the Visual Memory of Bees. Bull. Wis. Nat. Hist. Soc, 4, 1906, pp. 135-142. 1887. Handlirsch, A. Monographic der mit Nysson und Bembex verwandten Grabwespen. — I. Sit::b. Akad. Wiss. Wien., 95, 1887, pp. 246-421, 5 pis. 1904. Hoppner, H. Zur Biologie der Rubus-Bewohner II. Osmia parvula Duf. et Perr., Osmia leucomelcena K. und ihr Schmarotzer Stelis ornatula Nyl. Allgem. Zeitschr. Ent., 9, 1904, pp. 129-134, 2 figs. 1881. Hoffer, E. Ueber die Lebensweise des Apathus (Psithyrus) campes- tris. Mitth. naturzv. Vcr. Steicrmark., 1881, pp. 87-92. 1888. Hoffer, E. Die Schmarotzerhummeln Steiermarks. Graz, 1889. Also in Mitth. naturw. Ver. Steicrmark, Jahrg., 1888, pp. 84-88. 1802. Kirby, W. Monographia Apium Angliae. 2 vols. Ipswich, 1802. 1802. Latreille, P. A. Ordre Naturel des Insectes design-es generalement sous le nom d'Abeille, Apis Lin. Geoff. In Histoire Naturelle des Fourmis. Crapelet, Paris, 1802, pp. 401-438. 1810. Latreille, P. A. Considerations Generales sur I'ordre des animaux composant les classes des Crustaces, des Arachnides et des Insectes, 1810. 1827. Lepeletier de St. Fargeau, A. L. M. Encyclopedie Methodique, 10, Paris, 1827, p. 183. 1841. Lepeletier de St. Fargeau, A. L. M. Histoire Naturelle des Insectes. Suites a Buff on. Hjnnenopteres 2, 1841. 1890. Marchal, P. Formation d'une Espece par le parasitisme. fitude sur le Sphccodes gibbus. Rev. Scieut., 45, 1890, pp. 199-204. 1894. Marchal, P. Le Parasitisme des Sphccodes. Bull. Soc. Ent. France, 63, 1894, p. cxv. 1864. Morawitz, F. Ueber Vespa aiistriaca Panz. und drei neue Bienen. Bull. Soc. Imper. Nat. Moscou, 37, 1864, p. 439-449. 1901. Morice, R. F. D. Observations on Sphccodes. Ent. Month. Mag., 12, 1 901, pp. 53-58. 1871. Miiller, H. Anwendung der Darwinischen Lehrc auf Bienen. I'crh. Naturh. Ver. Prcuss. Rhcinl. u. Westphal, 1871. pp. 1-96, 2 pis. WHEELER— THE PARASITIC ACULEATA. 39 1903. Nielsen, J. C. Om Bislaegten Sphccodcs Latr. Ent. Meddel, (2), 2, 1903, pp. 21-30. 1883. Perez, J. Contribution a la Faune des Apiaires de France, 2^ partie. Act. Soc. Linn. Bordeaux, 27, 1883, pp. 205-378, 2 pis. -' 1884. Perez, J. Les Apiaires Parasites au point de Vue de la Theorie de I'Evolution. Bordeaux, 1884. 1894. Perez, J. Notes Zoologiques. Act. Soc. Linn. Bordcau.v, 47, 1894, pp. 231-331- 1910. Perez, J. Notes sur les Vespides. Act. Soc. Linn. Bordcau.v, 64, 1910, pp. 1-20. 1887. Perkins, R. C. L. Notes on Some Habits of Sphecodes Latr. and Noniada Fabr. Ent. Month. Mag., 23, 1887, pp. 271-274. 1889. Perkins, R. C. L. Is Sphecodes parasitic? Ent. Month. Mag., 25, 1889, pp. 206-208. 1912-14. Rabaud, E. fithologie et Comportement de Diverses Larves Endo- phytes. I., Olcthreutcs ohlongana. Bull. Scient. France Bclg., (7), 46, 1912, pp. 1-28, I fig.; II., Myclois cribclla, ibid., (7), 48, 1914, pp. 28-106, I fig. 1913. Renter, 0. M. Lebensgewohnheiten und Instinkte der Insekten. Ber- lin, Friedlander, 1913. 1869. Riley, C. V., and B. J. Walsh. Wasps and their Habits. Amcr. Ent., I, 1869, pp. 122-142, 17 figs. 1899. Robertson, Chas. On the Classification of Bees. Canad. Ent., 31, 1899, pp. 338-343- 1898. Robson, J. E. Vespa austriaca, a Cuckoo Wasp. Science Gossip, (n. s.), 5, 1898, pp. 69-73. 1906. Santschi, F. A propos des Moeurs parasitiques Temporaires des Fourmis du Genre Bothrioinynnex. Ann. Soc. Ent. France, 1906, PP- 363-392. 1913. Santschi, F. Une nouvelle fourmi parasite. Bull. Soc. d'Hist. Nat. d'Afr. Nord, 5, 1913, 2 pp. 1890. Saunders, E. On the Tongues of the British Anthophila. Joiirn. Linn. Soc. Lond. Zool., 23, 1890, pp. 410-432, 8 pis. 1903. Saunders, E. On the Relationship of Aculeate Inquilines and their Hosts. Ent. Month. Mag., (2), 14, 1903, pp. 272-274. 1881. Schmiedeknecht, 0. Ueber einige deutsche Vespa-Arten. Ent. Nach- richt., 7, 1881, pp. 313-318. 1882-1886. Schmiedeknecht, 0. Apidje Europese (Die Bienen Europas) Bd. I, u. 2. Berlin, Gumperda, 1882-1886. 1907. Schmiedknecht, 0. Die Hymenopteren Mitteleuropas. Jena, Gustav Fischer, 1907. 1903. Sharp, D. Vespa rufay, austriaca. Ent. Month. Mag., (2), i, 1903, pp. 297-299. 1865. Sichel, J. Revision Monographique, Critique et Synonymique du Genre Mellifere Sphecodes Latr. Ann. Soc. Ent. France, (4), 5, 1865, pp. 397-466. 1895. Sladen, F. W. Observations on Sphecodes rubicundus v. Hag. Ent. Month. Mag., 31, 1895, p. 256. 40 WHEELER— THE PARASITIC ACULEATA. 1912. Sladen, F. W. L. The Humble-Bee, Its Life-History and how to Do- mesticate it. Macmillan & Co., London, 1912. 1918. Sladen, F. W. L. The Genus Vcspo in Canada. Ottazva Naturalist, 32, 1918, pp. 71-72. 1892. Verhoeff, C. Zur Kenntnis des biologischen Verhaltnisses zwischen Wirt- und Parasiten-Bienenlarven. Zoo/. ^4nrc/(7., 15, 1892, pp. 41-43. 1908. Viehmeyer, H. Zur Koloniegriindiing der parasitischen Ameisen. Biol. Ccntralbl., 28, 1908, pp. 18-32. 1909. Viehmeyer, H. Beobachtungen und Experimente zur Koloniegriindung von Formica sangiiinca Latr. ZcitscJir. zciss. hisektbiol., 5, 1909, pp. 353-394- 1910. Viehmeyer, H. Ontogenetische u. phylogenetische Beobachtungen iiber die parasitische Koloniegriindung von Formica sanguinca. Biol. Ccntralbl., 30, 1910, pp. 569-580. 1907. Wagner, M. Psychobiologische Uhtersuchungen an Hummehi. Zoologica, 19, 1907, 239 pp., i pi. 1817. de Walckanaer, C. A. Memoires pour servir a I'Histoire naturelle des Abeilles Solitaires, qui composent le genre Halictc. Paris, Didot, 1817, 90 pp., I pi. 1905. Wasmann, E. Ursprung u. Entwickelung der Sklavrei bei den Ameisen. Biol. Ccntralbl., 25, 1905, pp. 1 17-127, 129-144. 161-169, 193-216, 256-270, 273-292. 1915. Wasmann, E. Das Gesellschaftsleben der Ameisen. i Bd., ^Miinster i. W., Aschendorffsche Verlagsbuchh., 191 5. 1835. Wesmael, C. Observations sur les Especes du Genre Sphccodc. Bull. Acad. Roy. Sc. BruxcUcs, 2, 1835, pp. 279-287. 1840. Westwood, J. Introduction to the Modern Classification of Insects. 2d vol., London, Longmans, etc., 1840. 1904. Wheeler, W. M. A New Type of Social Parasitism among Ants. Bull. Amcr. Mus. Nat. Hist., 20, 1904, pp. 347-375. 1906. Wheeler, W. M. On the- Founding of Colonies by Queen Ants, with Special Reference to the Parasitic and Slave-making Species. Bull. Amcr. Mus. Nat. Hist., 22, 1906, pp. 33-105, 7 pis. 1907. Wheeler, W. M. The Origin of Slavery Among Ants. Pop. Sci. Month., 71, 1907, pp. 550-559- 1908. Wheeler, W. M. The Ants of Casco Bay, Maine, with Observations on two Races of Formica sanguinca Latreille. Bull. Amcr. Mus. Nat. Hist.. 24, 1908, pp. 619-645. 1909. Wheeler, W. M. Observations on Some European Ants. Jouni. A''. Y. Ent. Soc, 17, 1909, pp. 172-184, 2 figs. 1910. Wheeler, W. M. Ants, their Structure, Development and Behavior. Columbia Univ. Press, 1910. 1918. Wheeler, W. M. A Study of Some Ant Larvae, with a Consideration of the Origin and Meaning of the Social Habit Among Insects. Proc. Amcr. Phil Soc, 57, 1918, pp. 293-343, 12 figs. 1913. Williams, F. X. Notes on the Habits of Some Wasps that Occur in Kansas, with Description of New Species. Kans. Univ. Sc. Bull., 8, 191 3, pp. 223-230, I pi. THE RELATION OF THE DIET TO PELLAGRA. By E. V. McCOLLUM, Ph.D. (Read April 25, igiQ-) Pellagra has long been suspected of being caused by faulty diet, and the eating of maize, particularly moldy maize, has been considered by some students of the disease to be the specific cause. The studies of Dr. Goldberger of the Public Health Service have eliminated corn as a causative agent in the etiology of this disease. Funk in his enthusiasm over the " vitamine " hypothesis adopted the view that not only beri-beri but scurvy, rickets, and pellagra were each due to the lack of a specific "vitamine'' in the diet. He further assumed, in order to explain the conflicting results in some of his experimental work, that other " vitamines " necessary for maintenance and for growth respectively are necessary in the food supply. We have attempted during the last two years to discover the exact nature of the deficiencies of such diets as are in common use among the people of the cotton mill villages in the South where pellagra is very common. We have employed what may properly be described as a biological method for the analysis of a food stuii' or of mixtures of foods. This consists in feeding any foodstuff which is faulty in one or more respects to a group of animals, and in other experimental groups the same food supplemented with single or multiple food additions, such as pure protein, one or more pure mineral salts, one or more of the still unidentified dietary factors in the form of suitably prepared preparations. We have throughout these studies employed as a working hypothesis the as- sumption that the essential constituents of an adecpate diet are protein of suitable quality and quantity, an adequate supply of the necessary inorganic elements in suitable combinations, an adequate energy supply in the form of protein, carbohydrate, and fat, and two as yet chemically unidentified dietary essentials which we have 41 42 McCOLLUM— RELATION OF DIET TO PELLAGRA. designated " fat-soluble A " and " water-soluble B." The lack of the former leads to the development of a specific eye trouble which seems to be accurately described as a type of xerophthalmia. The factor water-soluble B is we believe identical wtih the substance which prevents or cures the disease beri-beri characterized by gen- eral paralysis which is common in the Orient. Our experimental studies have now progressed so far as to enable us to assert with confidence that a satisfactory diet cannot be secured from mixtures containing any number of seeds or products derived from the milling of seeds together with tubers, edible roots, and meats. The vegetable foods which may be classed as seeds, tubers, and roots are all functionally storage organs, and their content of active protoplasm is relatively small in comparison with their bulk because of the large amount of reserve food material laid down in them. They may be sharply contrasted with the leaf of the plant, which except in special cases is not a repository for reserve proteins, carbohydrates, and fats, but represents, aside from its skeletal tissues, functionally active protoplasm. The leaf has very different dietary properties from those possessed by the tissues which are modified as storage organs, and in many instances at least represents complete foods for those types of animals whose digestive tracts are so capacious as to permit them to eat a sufficient amount of bulky material. We have been able to prepare fairly satisfactory diets for an omnivorous animal, the rat, from these two types of vegetable foods together, /. c, leaves and seeds, but never from the group of vegetable foods which are functionally storage organs. From this experience we have been led to differentiate sharply between two classes of foods which are usually collectively desig- nated as vegetables. Leaves are constituted so as to correct the dietary deficiencies of the storage tissues, whereas the seeds, tubers, and roots fail to supplement mutually each other's deficiencies with respect to either the inorganic moiety or the fat-soluble A. They do in some degree mutually enhance the quality of each other's pro- teins, but to a lesser degree than we had supposed before the com- pletion of a large amount of experimental work directed toward the McCOLLUM— RELATION OF DIET TO PELLAGRA. 43 quantitative comparison of the protein mixtures derived from pairs of seeds in considerable number. Mixtures of seeds, or of seeds, tubers, and roots, will in all cases require supplementing with respect to calcium, sodium, and chlorine among the inorganic elements, and fat-soluble A. In most such mixtures the quality of the proteins will likewise be sufficiently poor to require improvement before the optimum well-being can be secured. We are now in possession of a considerable amount of knowl- edge concerning the distribution of the dietary factor, fat-soluble A, in animal tissues. The body fats of the ruminants will probably always be found to be richer in this substance than the body fats of the omnivora because of the greater intake of it in the food. Mus- cle tissue has been found to be very poor in fat-soluble A, but the fats from the glandular organs, i. e., intracellular fats, are a good source of it. It follows, therefore, that muscle tissue such as round steak should not supplement mixtures of vegetable foods which be- long to the storage organ group with respect to fat-soluble A, and in our experience this proves to be the case. The inorganic content of muscle tissue resembles in a general way that of the storage or- gans of plants except in its very low content of magnesium. It is too poor in calcium, and to a lesser degree in sodium and chlorine, to support the optimum well-being in an animal. Muscle tissue fails to supplement the seeds, tubers, and roots on the inorganic side. The protein content of muscle tissue is high and the proteins are probably of high biological value, and, except as respects palata- bility, it is only in improving the quality of the protein content of the ration that the addition of meats of this class enhances the value of a mixture of products derived from the storage organ group of plant products. These considerations indicate the basis for our distinction be- tween two groups of foodstuffs. One of these, which includes milk, eggs, and the leafy vegetables, we have designated as "pro- tective foods," in order to call attention to their special importance in the diet. They are protective in that they are so constituted with respect to their inorganic content, content of fat-soluble A, and the quality of their proteins that they correct in great measure when 44 McCOLLUM— RELATION OF DIET TO PELLAGRA. used in sufficient amounts the faults of the remainder of the food mixture irrespective of the extent to which it is derived from either seed, tuber, or root products. We have been able to plan satisfac- tory diets of naturally occurring foods only by the inclusion of one or more of these protective foods. The other group of natural foodstuffs includes all seeds and seed products, such as the cereal grains and their milling products (wheat flour, corn-meal, polished rice, etc.), the legume seeds, tubers, edible roots, nuts, fruits, and such cuts of meats as come from muscle tissue. In all cases where we have attempted to correct the dietary defi- ciencies of a seed mixture by the addition of leaf only we have not secured results so good as with milk, especially with such amounts of leaf as would be acceptable in the human diet. The leafy foods are eaten by Europeans and Americans only in a very water rich condition, and it is difficult to secure the consumption of enough to correct the deficiencies in the remainder of the diet. With animals, when we have fed dry powdered mixtures containing as much as 25 to 40 per cent, of the diet derived from leaf and the remainder from plant products of the storage organ class, the nutrition has been very good in some instances, but not all combinations will be equally valuable. Eggs are decidedly poorer in calcium than are the leaves or milk, when only the part exclusive of the shell is con- sidered. The shell serves as a source of lime to the developing chick. Eggs do not, therefore, supplement food mixtures derived from storage tissues with respect to calcium to the degree that milk and leafy vegetables do. Even in such types of diet as contain one or more of the pro- tective foods in fairly liberal amounts, it is certain that for such rapidly growing species of animals as the hog and rat the inorganic content is not entirely satisfactory, although it may be good enough to enable the animal to perform all the functions of growth and reproduction in a way which, in the absence of definite knowledge of what the species is capable of, we should regard as normal. \\'e have been accustomed to regard as normal an achievement in vigor and well being both in man and animals which falls far short of that seen in exceptional cases. The most important inorganic deficiency in seed, tuber, and meat mixtures is calcium, and this is so pro- McCOLLUM— RELATION OF DIET TO PELLAGRA. 45 nounced that we are of the opinion that even in those human die- taries in which such calcium-rich food as milk is used in fair liber- ality, the intake of calcium may be still below the optimum, and that a direct addition of this element in the form of the carbonate or lactate might be of distinct benefit in human nutrition except per- haps in those regions where the w-ater is unusually rich in calcium salts. Since civilized man usually adds sodium chloride to his foods to suit the taste, the shortage of sodium and chlorine in the diet of man presents no problem. An addition of calcium could be most conveniently made to our foods through the use of a mixture of equal parts of common salt and of calcium carbonate in the kitchen and on the table. A question \\hicli has never been answered to the satisfaction of physiologists is : How nuich protein should the diet contain in order to maintain physiological well being? At about the time when the question was being most discussed, the chemistry of the proteins was developed to a point which made it clear that there were great differences in the biological values of the proteins from dift'erent sources, depending on their yields of certain amino-acids. This makes futile any attempt to establish a particular intake of protein which may represent the minimum, optimum, or maximum amount consistent with maintenance of " normal " vitality and health. The quality of the proteins must be known before anything can be said about the amount of protein necessary. From biological tests we now know that the proteins of the pea or navy bean are worth only about half as much for growth in the rat as are equal amounts of proteins from one of the cereal grains, and that the latter have about half the value for the conversion into body proteins which can be shown for the proteins of milk. The relative values of the proteins from different sources, as well as the absolute values of certain of them, are just now becoming appreciated. There are two opposing views regarding the amount of protein which will produce the best results. Those who advocate the low protein diet point to the "specific dynamic action" of protein, through which it stimulates metabolism. They believe that a high consumption of protein furnishes pabulum for the development of an excessive growth of putrefactive bacteria, with the result that 46 M.cCOLLUM— RELATION OF DIET TO PELLAGRA. toxic or irritating products of the degradation of certain amino- acids are absorbed in amounts sufficient to cause damage to the tis- sues. It has been recommended that man should, in adult life, take only such an amount of protein as will cover the endogenous loss due to tissue metabolism, together with a not well-defined " margin of safety." The opponents of this view regard a liberal protein allowance as essential to vigor and aggressiveness, and point to the use of liberal amounts of meat by the peoples who have been char- acterized by greatest achievement. Among all the progressive peo- ples of the world the food supply is derived to a greater or less extent from daily products, and this portion rather than the meat eaten we have come to regard as of peculiar importance in improv- ing the quality of the diet. In order to test this question we con- ducted a series of experiments, employing rats which were about nine months old. or about one fourth through the normal span of life for this species, and were in excellent nutritive condition. They were fed diets which were fairly satisfactory in all respects except that the protein content was not far from the actual amount re- quired for the maintenance of body weight for a few" weeks. We observed unmistakable signs that the vitality of the animals was rap- idly lowered on such a dietary regime. This was shown especially by the rapid aging and short span of life. Even though the initial body weight was approximately maintained for a period of three months or more, distinct signs of aging were always apparent within five to ten months. Three months in the life of a rat correspond to about 8.4 per cent, of the average span of life. It can be readily appreciated that if harmful effects in corresponding degree follow the adherence by man to such low protein diets they would not be- come apparent within the time covered by any experiment yet con- ducted upon a diet squad, few of which have been restricted to any experimental diet beyond six months. A reputed satisfactory out- come of such experiments cannot be accepted as evidence that men on diets which furnish but a small margin of protein over the actual maintenance requirements are so nourished as best to promote health. Aging at two to four times the rate observed in the most satisfactorily nourished would escape observation in any experiment on man with which we are familiar. McCOLLUM— RELATION OF DIET TO PELLAGRA. 47 The results of experiments with grown men restricted to experi- mental diets for a few weeks or months do not form a safe basis for drawing conclusions as to the quality of the foods employed. Cer- tain conclusions may be warranted from general observations on children living on faulty diets, and important deductions may safely be drawn from the experiences of large groups of people living upon more or less restricted lists of foodstulTs. Beyond this we must be guided in human nutrition by the results of animal experimentation, in which the conditions can be made sufficiently rigid to bring into stronger contrast the faults of certain types of diets as contrasted with others. It is certain that the injurious efifects of certain die- tary practices are very real and yet not promptly apparent. The debilitating effects of faulty diets may vary in their severity from such as will produce polyneuritis or xerophthalmia or scurvy within a few weeks, at one extreme, to such as will cause nervousness and restlessness in varying degree, susceptibility to disease, and the ac- quisition of. all those characters such as roughness of the skin, thin- ness and coarseness of hair, and attenuation of form which accom- pany the process of aging at a distinctly greater rate than would be the case were the diet of a highly satisfactory character. We have much evidence that in case there is a close approxima- tion of the actual physiological minimum for any factor during growth, such as one or more of the essential inorganic elements or one of the unidentified dietary essentials, lack of ability to meet the more strenuous demands of reproduction and the suckling of young will be observed, and the tendency will be great for the individual to be carried off suddenly either by disease, or, as frequently hap- pens, by causes which are not readily determinable. All our experience with diets of low protein content have indi- cated that animals do not remain in a state of optimum well-being even when the content of protein is sufficiently high to maintain in certain individuals the initial body weight over as much as lo per cent, of the normal span of life. We believe that health and vigor are promoted by a liberal intake of protein of good quality better than by any diet in which there is a tendency towards parsimony with respect to this dietary factory. It should not be lost sight of, however, that there are other factors in nutrition which are of equal 48 McCOLLUM— RELATION OF DIET TO PELLAGRA. importance with protein, and that if the optimum well-being is to be attained the diet must be rightly constituted with respect to all its parts. In addition to this the prompt elimination of the fecal residues is essential and is a great relief to the tissues of the entire body. With an understanding such as we now have of the nature of the faults of diets of different types, and an appreciation of the fundamental importance of deriving the constituents of the diet from the right sources, this being of much greater importance than composition as revealed by chemical analysis, one is in a position to interpret the relation of pellagra to diet. Goldberger has emphasized the fact that the diet of those living in districts in which pellagra is common is lacking in sufficient amounts of certain foodstuffs, especially milk, eggs, meats, and the legume seeds. In many instances bolted wheat flour, degerminated corn-meal, polished rice, sugar, syrups, or molasses, sweet potatoes, and meat, principally pork, form almost the entire list of foods eaten by families during the winter season, at the end of which new attacks of pellagra are regularly seen. From what has been said it will be evident that the diet of the pellagrous is deficient in four re- spects, and that the nature of these is well understood. They are the deficiencies of the plant products which belong to the storage organ group, but more pronounced because of the prominent place which milling products, which represent the endosperm of the seed, find in such diets. Products such as bolted fiour, degerminated corn-meal, and polished rice are decidedly poorer in inorganic ele- ments than are the seeds from which they are derived ; their pro- teins appear to be of poorer quality than are those of the cell-rich structures near the periphery, or of the germ, and they are almost devoid of fat-soluble A and very poor in water-soluble B. Wliereas diets derived from whole seeds, tubers, and edible roots contain sufficient phosphorus to meet the requirements of the most rapidly growing species of animal, such as the rat. and the limiting inor- ganic elements are calcium, sodium and chlorine, it may be that in diets in which the degerminated and decorticated cereal products are employed in liberal amounts, and where in addition starch, sugar and molasses are regularly used freely, phos^jhorus or iron or both may likewise become important deficiencies. McCOLLUM— RELATION OF DIET TO PELLAGRA. 49 Goldberger attempted to solve the problem of whether pellagra is due to lack of something essential in the typical " pellagrous " diet by a direct experiment on man. He restricted men to a diet pre- pared from bolted wheat flour, degerminated corn-meal, polished rice, starch, sugar, syrup, pork fat, sweet potatoes, cabbage, collards, turnip greens and coftee, and at the end of five and a half months five of the eleven men who took this diet were diagnosed as exhib- iting incipient signs of pellagra. That the disease was actually pro- duced has been emphatically denied by McNeal. In another experiment Goldberger and fifteen of his associates made heroic attempts to infect themselves with material from the lesions of pellagra, and with excreta from pellagrins, but without success. The experimenters were, however, taking a diet of good quality while these attempts were being made. Still more convincing evidence that the diet is at least an impor- tant predisposing factor in the etiology of pellagra is furnished by the experience of Goldberger in improving the diets in institutions in which the disease was common. These diets were observed to consist largely of degerminated seed products, tubers or roots, and fat pork, together with minimal amounts of leafy vegetables, fruits, eggs, meats, and milk, and the legume seeds. On modifying the diets of orphanages and of an insane asylum by the addition of lean meat, milk, eggs, and peas or beans, the condition with respect to pellagra steadily improved, and the disease promptly disappeared. New cases were admitted from without and the sick were mingled with the well, but after the improvement of the diet no new cases developed. Those who have had extensive experience with pellagra are in agreement in the matter of the fundamental importance of dietary treatment together with any other method of management of pella- grins, and the assertion has been made by Roussel that without dietary measures all remedies fail. The results obtained by Gold- berger point clearly to the belief that the disease develops because of some one or more faults in the diet. They afiford no basis, how- ever, for judging as to the nature of these faults, whether they are in the nature of a lack of a sufficient amount of one or more chem- ically unidentified dietary essentials of a specific character, as is PROC. AMER. PHIL. SOC, VOL. LVIII, D, JUNE 25, I9I9. 50 McCOLLUM— RELATION OF DIET TO PELLAGRA. known to be the case with beri-beri and the xerophthahnia of die- tary origin, or whether pellagra may be the result of taking a diet faulty in respect to the quality or quantity of protein, relative short- age of one or more of the essential inorganic elements, or of the recognized unidentified dietary essentials as contributing factors. In his earlier papers Goldberger expressed the view that : " On the whole, however, the trend of available evidence strongly sug- gests that pellagra will prove to be a ' deficiency ' disease very closely related to beri-beri." Chittenden and Underbill reported the pro- duction in dogs of a condition suggestive of pellagra in man by re- stricting the animals for periods of from two to eight months to a ■ diet of crackers, peas, and cottonseed oil. They formulated the con- clusion that : " From the facts enumerated the conclusion seems tenable that the abnormal state may be referred to a deficiency of some essential dietary constituent or constituents, presumably be- longing to the group of hitherto unrecognized but essential compo- nents of an adequate diet." We have reported elsewhere the results of a study of the nature of the dietary faults of a mixture of bolted wheat flour, peas, and cottonseed oil, and found that it was an incomplete food, but that it was rendered complete for the support of normal growth in the young rat by the addition of purified protein, certain inorganic salts (NaCl and CaCOs) and fat-soluble A (in butter fat). It is of course not satisfactorily established that the condition produced in dogs by the diet of Chittenden and Underbill was actually the coun- terpart of pellagra in man, strikingly similar as the results appear. We hold the view that if the condition produced in the dogs of these investigators is actually to be regarded as experimental pellagra, it cannot be regarded as caused by the lack of an unidentified dietary essential, since the only one of these necessary for completing the diet (for the rat) is that contained in butter fat, and the latter sub- stance is not curative for any condition resembling pellagra, but for a specific eye disease, xerophthalmia. In his most recent studies Goldberger and his associates exam- ined the diets of pellagrous and non-pellagrous families in villages in South Carolina, and found that the diet of the non-pellagrous contained more milk, fresh meats, eggs, butter, and cheese than did McCOLLUM— RELATION OF DIET TO PELLAGRA. 51 the diets of pellagrous families, and that calorific value of the diets of the former households was somewhat higher than of the latter. Animal proteins were eaten more liberally and cereal proteins were eat<=^n less abundantly by the non-pellagrous than by the pellagrous households. The pellagrous households had a distinctly smaller supply of fat-soluble A, and a somewhat smaller supply of water- soluble B than did the non-pellagrous, and the inorganic content of the diets of the latter were of less satisfactory character than those of the former households. We do not regard a moderate shortage of one or another of the chemically unidentified dietary factors as of greater gravity than faulty character in any other dietary factor. Our studies of the several foodstufl:s lead us to agree with Gold- berger's interpretation of the quality of the diets of pellagrous and non-pellagrous households in all respects. From the observations which we have made concerning the chemical factors which the diet must contain in order to be adequate for the support of growth in the young, or the maintenance of phys- iological well-being in the adult, together with the results of our studies of the qualities of each of the more important kinds of nat- ural foodstuffs, we are not able to account for the etiology of pel- legra on the assumption that it is a disease which is due to the lack of a specific substance or substances of unknown chemical nature, as are without question beri-beri and xerophthalmia. This follows from the fact that, with the exceptions of certain manufactured food products which are derived from the endosperm of the decorticated grains, any natural foodstuffs of the class of seeds, tubers, edible roots, or leafy parts of the plant, are so constituted that they can be supplemented by means of three kinds of purified food additions of known nature : viz., protein, certain salts, and fat-soluble A, so as to be complete for the nutrition of the young rat throughout the growing period. This has been demonstrated to be true not only for each of the ordinary human foods but likewise for such mixtures as form the monotonous diets of the pellagrous. It is necessary, therefore, that we choose between two alterna- tives in arriving at an opinion concerning the etiology of pellagra. We have the assurances of Goldberger and his associates that a diet such as that described on page 49, and having the qualities described 52 McCOLLUM— RELATION OF DIET TO PELLAGRA. in the preceding paragraph, has produced incipient pellagra experi- mentally in man, but this claim has been disputed by other competent observers. In our experimental work with the diet of peas, crackers (wheat flour and fat), and cottonseed oil, which in the experience of Chittenden and Underbill produced in dogs a condition resem- bling pellagra in man, produced in rats only general malnutrition, without the skin changes, diarrhea, or pathological changes in the mucosa of the alimentary tract. Are we to accept the view that pellagra is actually produced by a deficiency of something necessary to the normal nutrition of man but not necessary for the rat ? The possibility that the dogs of Chittenden and Underbill were infected is not excluded, and an infectious agent may well have established itself in animals restricted to a diet so faulty as one derived from crackers (wheat flour and fat), peas, and cottonseed oil. Gold- berger seems to have safeguarded his experimental men against in- fection, and it is unfortunate that a sufficient number of undisputed authorities were not called into consultation to forestall the possi- bility of a question arising concerning the accuracy of the diagnosis of pellagra, such as McNeal has raised. We are left in the situation which has arisen in the discussion of the etiology of scurvy. It has been clearly shown that there is