Prec rgehade pearing yd Vain ae * t ot yt 2 st tek be vayy VIVA CE RSH Soy te eee : fy BREE by ks ta WA aN TaN tie ou t A : Maes Pee eae WC ok Pe WEG yay Uw. ' ‘ Pe. We OPER OC a NC DAL Han Ce viruryes 1 Swen AH IS r , Te BO \y yan styl! ty 4 »'' Het A 9 \ AV Rae - ree Ay NMG Be ‘heel watts . yf ays pants: ‘ Veacyms SAG. v Ve ESE Le bE RROD Vp eo ae ee ee ee x aoe be Dh WO | POV ep eh Dp ge VRP ete Ve els Prye weer eT Oye Pa te Ry ates ’ nee he NN ne ’ . Y ‘ ’ sy 7 Cee ek ; ; A aN Yarrgs ‘ yt ah ' An yew is ; : . 4 wares bats yer hh \ ’ ' ‘ ’ peel ea sey, farportt aby . of , ivr } P WR aie y it ; x Wh ted e . ‘ ' . nie “° ' i ta tad ae eee ' 5 ar ee We | ' + Fi ' Pere ae | a ie An t , ta ‘ ‘ : z ‘ Cyn ‘ L935) 4 ‘ , a) ‘ ‘ i ay a , yf ae ' oe ite : bye 8 ‘ ' aca red bh te ne Pht pa U4 b if A 5 PAG es : 1 ae : y We ee , i are 4 hb. 4 " . DARA BOE Ci A yy Brean A ' Cee SN P ; LAP fet wis i é , — a TIS ——~ 2 Nise Seal Me MYINOSHLINS ('S3 1YVvua Mitt BRARIES << = = > ie = gS Ww —_ wn ARI ES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI = ac < My 4 ia. = tif X\ z 2 fs “ z Wf SS z = AS z : YY fe G2 SS > = NN 5 VLILSNI_ NVINOSHLIWS SAIYVYEIT LIBRARIES Z bs Z g - 5 oe a = i: c a ee = ro) sa re) Zz a 2 ARI eae ee TSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI z o pees Oo = a = = a 5 Fi F is & E = ea ES Z PSN ee NOSHLINS SA lyYvua Mout BRARIES =< = _< \S f = are ae Sia ~\ . CO wit ip * 2 Gy = SS 4 — A Z = 5 = : o > a » ARI ES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI uu les us ~ Bins Aa a 7 _ [ea = PL = < wx ge Me 5 fava (s8) 1G 5 = a “ z 4 VLILSNI_NVINOSHLINS 4 1Yvudgd 17 tl BRARIES Se ee 1) gaia age. ee ~ SMITHSONIAN _ ~¥ NVINOSHLINS SMITHSONIAN NVINOSHLIWS NG SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI S3IYVEEIT LIBRARIES NVINOSHLIWS SMITHSONIAN NVINOSHLIWS INSTITUTION SMITHSONIAN NVINOSHLINS S31u¥vygl LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN SMITHSONIAN NVINOSHLIWS x SMITHSONIAN gt, ION NOILNLILSNI Vip ‘po fp di7 LIBRARIES NVINOSHLINS — NOILNLILSNI INST S31uVva INSTITUT SAlyuV INSTITUT SAluVus INSTITUT S3AlIuVYs NVINOSHLINS SSIYVYEIT LIBRARIES NS SS SMITHSONIAN INSTI bie = Wee oad bis ee -———ad z= NEE Um pa NU a = = a7) —— NLILSN! NVINOSHLINS S3IYVYa!I1_ LIBRARIES. SMITHSONIAN INSTIT me) x: =z Sr sages = ak ra 5 2 OWNS 5 = Lig 2 re y SE, Law a 2 WS \ yp = Ne E e\Y 2 - GE = - > = > = ih on = ” _ 2 a RARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILALILSNI NVINOSHLINS S314\ RN wo = = nee ” = © a: B & 2 . 2 oO = AAS o ) “S ae N ras wa —. hy Ere a os NS ie = eee ee = m SSS m m o we = wo = n SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILOALILSNI NVINOSHLINS S314) : Fiat. 2 a = > Ne = bE S z = y = z . 3 Wy? 1 ¥ wn Dn ~ We G@ yy 7) wn O rT WINS oO Vio = Oo ¢ 2 =e we er er Ee ae > = > >" = > =z ” eee a 7) Zz NVINOSHLINS S3I1YVYE!IT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTIT = * Ww — w — 7) ag 7) 7.) ea oc ra o See c ow e Py S 2) “SS = re) ra oO i = 2 a a = RAR 1ES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNILILSNI S31y 2 = ab = i z Gam s a S o a Kb uae be ee = =e at a F =] = D = > = - * = - = - E n 2 ; c = 7) = w = n” = aay Ss wo O = > z SMITHSONIAN NVINOSHLIWS SMITHSONIAN Yi SMITHSONIAN bs _—- y ‘. -RARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILALILSNI NVINOSHLINS S314 RIES we SS Wars \. * ION NOILNLILSNI LIBRARIES INSTI S3iuyvugi1 LIBRARIES STITIS a2 NO, LTD ADINO x SMITHSONIAN ION NOILNLILSNI | 2 a ‘fp ff di1 LIBRARIES d 17 : ie : aaa mh th Sak PROCEEDINGS of the ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY of WASHINGTON Volume 81 OFFICERS FOR THE YEAR 1979 President President-elect Recording Secretary Corresponding Secretary Treasurer Editor Custodian Program Committee Chairman Membership Committee Chairwoman Delegate to the Washington Academy of Sciences Hospitality Chairwoman Published by the Society WASHINGTON, D.C. 1979 Donald R. Davis T. J. Spilman Wayne N. Mathis Mignon B. Davis F. Christian Thompson Manya B. Stoetzel Sueo Nakahara Michael Faran Joyce A. Utmar Donald R. Davis Helen Sollers-Riedel Pica Beet eee: Ct. on. Pr tien) de Migiomyidies mig | on itt [oe a 94 i ei ite irfol Table of Contents, Volume 81 ANDERSON, D. M. and P. E. BOLDT.—Identification of larvae of two European spe- cies of Ceutorhynchinae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) found in Carduus macrocephalus Destontamess(@ompositaeys sos. ses cnt c oe sort eels eaehe hole ec cae he dies oe ei aloeusieael ee PORN ESS At ON It See AID OS IREMB ig cece saa lcr a qerarctonetersakecere wate eae ora arate eleva epee reas BARNES, J. K.—The taxonomic position of the New Zealand genus Prosochaeta Mal- fochy(Dipteras SCLOMYZIGAe) iiss ice cee wie eet sisc te Aetna 6 teah Sie acl eraonei ores alae seuereine = BARROWS, E. M.—Polistes wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) show interference com- petition with other insects for Kermes scale insect (Homoptera: Kermesidae) secre- OTS reed Soe ec has OR OR RS Rt aan mth se aan yon Mi CL eee aL Cale) BO RIAIR Tae —— Se eyMiBINIKIE Avy Si ecackerecene trerosasralsinee ont verohecione Eetevoeeta erat rite BOHART, R. M. and L. S. KIMSEY.—A key to the species of Ectemnius in Amer- ica north of Mexico with notes and description of a new species (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae) tacrer oe sete ous hea Gem ceeeys Meket eee. ed, «ee aed ee Sone eee BOLD PE See ANDERSON Ds Mio. 58: duce sm clare Serta: stots oul ane es ee nee BOEENBEMG:=—see MCDANIEL] Be Cee Acces so beits cece aeciGites en crsiche arsine inert: BUEINOZSORDA, Ji=——SeerBic INT, OF Sic UR a3 sete ciate oc gee Sel sate erage ai cuho) veins CAMPOS. ES 'G==See EADS. IRE Bae aac cou nto ape tetuerael sie « char we BERS ois oy ots a OS AIUE SON bs t-——See WHETE. TORS ys... cen ae ana. cup cn tioaee Maerua ey ok ees CARLSON, R. W.—Seventy-three names validated in “Jchneumon” and “‘Evania” (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) in posthumously published letters written by Cuvier. . CARLSON, R. W.—The correct name for Theroscopus micator of authors (Hymenop- LEkassl ChMEUMONIGAE) Ks cc cuccsicsccopssSec vanes S edclevs Ones) eaun eno che one Shey ein, osc Gli nie OR Ra eerie CERMELI L., M. and C. F. SMITH—Keys to species of the genus Picturaphis (Ho- moptera: Aphididae) with descriptions: of Mew SPECIES? «24. a. 22.1 )os 1 tom eee ETABIBING S7—— Seen lee OEIC ris cosecentace cots teiseeene toners erecchc ar mice earner CLARK, W. E.—Taxonomy and biogeography of weevils of the genus Sibinia Germar (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) associated with Prosopis (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae) TOY: ZANTE EXE OUT Nh ec a ere enna ea Re Re Nee ek aed ony SA ARS a re oe A ato 6 COCHRAN, D. G.—A method for rearing the sand cockroach, Arenivaga tonkowa (Dict opteraseolypnavidae) ies secre tracts ant omic e rc rinerrere een) Ae SCR heme ee COSCARON, S., G. B. FAIRCHILD, and C. B. PHILIP.—Rediscovery of both sexes of the enigmatic Zophina eiseni (Townsend) (Diptera: Tabanidae) in Baja California SIT ea carsuchck cae es cape ei oe a a eer ate en CN ern MA Rd eh ng PPO Aa Lt ee DELONG, D. M.—Studies of the Gyponinae with six new species of Polana (Homop- teraraCicadellidae) te yeni. re tears Saeed Pact hate tore Ln ENE ST a ae obsess Poet a tae PMO Tate De MEILLON, B. and W. W. WIRTH.—A taxonomic review of the subgenus Phy- tonelea ot Horcipomyia (Diptera Ceratopogomidae)igue.....0-.. 0202 cece os ee sean DENNIS DAS:—SeceveAWVIGNE Re: ole. Aaa etait Enea ntsc) acdc ees eh aceite DENNIS, D. S.—Ethology of Holcocephala fusca in Virginia (Diptera: Asilidae) ...... EADS, R. B., E. G. CAMPOS, and A. M. BARNES.—New records for several flea (Siphonaptera) species in the United States, with observations on species parasitizing cannivoreswinuthes Rocky Mountain! Regione +). eietas ee eee eee ae te ae ae nie or ELLIOTT, N., F. KURCZEWSKI, S. CHAFLIN, and P. SALBERT.—Preliminary an- notated list of the wasps of San Salvador Island, the Bahamas, with a new species of Cerceris (Hymenoptera: Tiphiidae, Scoliidae, Vespidae, Pompilidae, Sphecidae) .. 460 38 285 570 111 486 460 621 522 38 379 178 438 366 38 352 EVANS, H. E.—The genus Dissomphalus in northwestern South America (Hymenop- Heras Ctinyldae) bss aac csescishoners creeks: cay taste t nous) SeeTOe neat cle aie ee ae er EVANS, H. E.—Additions to knowledge of the bethylid fauna of Hispaniola (Hymenop- ter ayeBethivlidae) rt cs ceo miseiiceecnd omer Ss oe oe oe One NORTON, R. A.—Notes on synonymies, recombinations, and lectotype designations in NathangBanks? ispeciesiofNothrus (Acam:) Onibatel) ~ 225 02u.< te terelcetyes Se 2 oer NORIO NERS At —=SeesMGDANUBIC, IBe. sige crore asoa.cchehe SERIE toe bs Ree ae NUHN, T. P. and C. G. VAN DYKE.—Laboulbenia formicarum Thaxter (Ascomyco- tina: Laboulbeniales) on ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Raleigh, North Carolina RVUhcagne Wal OS LECONG cree ew fareys Seek ees oiys cco. ePe 2 Bok Sgh, ALN PEE eee OE O’BRIEN, M. F. and F. E. KURCZEWSKI.—Observations on the nesting behavior of Alysson conicus Provancher (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae) ........2...2ee0ceceesesees PARKER, C. R. and J. R. VOSHELL, JR.—A new species of Hydroptila from Vir- Pinian (UoLeno ptcra-esky GrOptilicae) Mev tercxcisteyesek ci ces Beacicie) koto een ciel vokeronicte Eee eG wb SeeuSOSCAIRONIAG? o: craic sets oh eobecske avs aoe NA Tekh sie ees 101 435 248 NBINIKOWESI Ms IRs INO NOMIC Vs Ils elcadoonacedboocdn soma Goomsebaamoner POLHEMUS, J. T. and J. L. HERRING.—A further description of Hermatobates bredini Herring and a new record for Cuba (Hemiptera: Hermatobatidae) ........... RAW SINS sree —See SHOES ORD a Gensco) cor eee ati eieee REICHART, C. V.—A new Anisops from Kenya (Hemiptera: Notonectidae) ......... RUSSELL, L. K.—A new genus and a new species of Boreidae from Oregon (Mecop- SABE RIE P= Seer RICIORT Ne oie Cais rae we ete ee eee eee SCARBROUGH, A. G.—Predatory behavior and prey of Diogmites missouriensis BromlevamneArkansasi(DipterasAsilidae)y = cmise es sl oceicls ieee eee ere SCARBROUGH, A. G. and B. E. SRAVER.—Predatory behavior and prey of Atomosia DUC GMD (enasA SINAC) i aes ce ees cae oes clapeue scr erent reieae tn co ate en eee SCHMIDT, J. O. and C. E. MICKEL.—A new species of Dasymutilla from Florida (iyvimenopterasMiurtillid aes ser ctotarseyoh ates eat eeevecerchrser ers seers ss ae ae aera ee ea SCISWISITBIR, IR. OSES SUIMIMIIRS AE ME. Geleiolocig’s doolio bolo in. do cdlondccoo'o abo ous SHENEFELT, R. D.—Some unusual Braconidae (Hymenoptera) .................... SHOLES, O. DV. and J. E. RAWLINS.—Distribution of orb-weavers (Araneidae: ATAneac) snenomorencousrold-neldavegetationiasce ee sacs eee ee icin itera SLATER, J. A.—A key to the species of Patritius Stal with the description of four new species from South America (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae) ......................-.. SMILEY, R. L.—Pygmephorus athiasae Wicht: A redescription of the holotype (Acari: RYO tidac) Permtres eeds Seo tce te oe at eee: MUSE Ws beet a fatame eheieoiie cate eee SMITE Gb: ——SeesC PRIMED Tee Ni ahieete s ek eer eee a tee ee ee SPANGLER, P. J.—Hydramara argentina, a description of its larva and a report on lisidistmbution (Coleopterasiydrophilidac)im anmca. sm aoe eee le ae ae eee ee SPILMAN, T. J.—Larvae and pupae of Centronopus calcaratus and Centronopus suppressus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), with an essay on wing development in pupae SRAVEIR SB aE see sSCARBROUGH RANG th. att ne eine eee oe eae STEYSKAL, G. C.—Reference of Cephalia fulvicornis and Cephalia maculipennis (Diptera: Otitidae) to the genera Euxesta (Diptera: Otitidae) and Rivellia (Diptera: lati stom atyd ae)! = crc se creiets choke ca stescuese Raza lean seca Sian IA Asc rrr STEYSKAL, G. C.—Biological, anatomical, and distributional notes on the genus Gallopistromviastiendell (Diptera Otitidae) memes os Onc ain Gee oe ae eee oe STIMMEL, J. F.—Seasonal history and distribution of Carulaspis minima (Targ.-Tozz.) iInvbennsyivanias (Homoptera: Diaspididae)ia.-ic sec ce ae sins see kee cite erecta SUMMERS, F. M. and R. O. SCHUSTER.—Revision of Acrotocarus Banks (Acari: Canestrini dae) re. week ee ee ee ree eee ea alone Eee ik Pee aoe eee TRIPLEHORN, C. A.—Two new species of Corticeus from Florida and the West In- dresn(Coleoptenas tienebnonidae) yan ae ema Aerie oer criee eer er er eee TRUMBLE, J. T. and R. L. PPENKOWSKI.—Development and survival of Megaselia scalaris (Diptera: Phoridae) at selected temperatures and photoperiods ............. WEAINSDINGKSE Ss Ca Gi — See VIWIRINGw is tP rercceeyepeuater patios eects cee tee nen eee VOSHE RIS HaRestIRI = S ey BAIR KaBIReg Cree Be cast sats cone oe tanec SA Seccnes ie rey aera WADAS Ye S eee WITIRARET ss Wo Wet ne cia do ORR cree sip eae CO UNE AE Si lo coreg eeerh eee WARNER, R. E.—The genus Eudiagogus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Leptopiinae), with two new species of the weed Sesbania (Leguminosae) ................+2-008- WERNER | Fi==Seer HE PZ Mie) oo Nasi as arte a aie n okie viele a Gree Ouasiee one ae ees eave VaR RA GaiRe——See HENRY 0. Ue, ie atiig a ton seb wi ec os Aer thine cae ts Meee bina Are Gee ——O6e LIEN Y cells Win vowtats chistes aeetic oiraset ete e socean hs re cierere'e eer. UT: =SeesKPNNEDYs dh Hos a eh in a al bs Mec baie ce on the WHITE, R. E.—New synonymy and new combinations primarily in American taxa meMlEOpteraPATIODIIGAG) Pater atoncencen et nnd Gunes cee ice cree eaten ce erst els clove Gia aenoniays WHITE, T. R., P. H. CARLSON, and R. C. FOX.—Emergence patterns of fall and winter stoneflies (Plecoptera: Filipalpia) in northwestern South Carolina ............ WHITEHEAD, D. R.—Recognition characters and distribution records for species of Conotrachelus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) that damage avocado fruits in Mexico and CETTE YAS VCE ret iene a ai cori eri re nee ee acdsee Pert nde Be ce WHITEHEAD, D. R.—Notes on Apteromechus Faust of America north of Mexico KMeoleopteras Curculionidaes Cryptorhynchinae)\) yee. «- sea eerie acess se ses eee MARGE. We wWwe-—See DE MBTEIEON) Be aiercis secs cis Sine che fois tie ote sae ee cements RVG eM VWAeWe-— See GROGAIN EG WW UR Caer cnces cceertieirrete Ae cite cree inert eee WIRTH, W. W. and Y. WADA.—Two new species of the genus Camptopterohelea Wirth and Hubert from southeast Asia (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) ................. WOLFE, G. W. and J. F. MATTA.—Three new species of Hydroporus (Coleoptera: Dytiscrdac)tromthe southeastem: United States) 5 csc ae teenie en ional YOUNG, D. A.—A review of the leafhopper genus Cofana (Homoptera: Cicadelli- LAS) pemmereerek oe enter cfc Meh ey 5G) Sisuelss Sasa: nk aeons chcheade ace: hemo ce aay ee ereteed onc eat OP eh Sale ZUNGOLI, P. A.—Eupteromalus viridescens (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae), a new parasite association for Pediobius foveolatus (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) and Epi- lachnasvarivestis (Coleoptera; ‘Coccinelladac)) 222k. 2.. 2 es aso tines oe es ee BAIN GAAr——See PER EVA Te. Wire ode sclera cemey are nicie tic erenstetave stayla era 6. dvats Gepterters meee SKOIGIEIN 18a (Cpa exe Ko) DANN] 8) yaa) 3}. Moles ee cise cls crete e ctaet cmc cides eaters caw a ool dec BOWRGEOIS. CE Secu DARE WD RAIIESIW er, ciepual dices cuore octavo Gieveashounate lation ere JOHNSON, M. D.—Some notes on two species of stelidine bees from Indiana (Hyme- NO Pleka-wMecacniIGae) wy eye® atone Ako TR eens ok ee PIS Sin eS McDANIEL, B. and E. G. BOLEN.—A new distribution record for Podocinum pacifi- GuMmmEBelese,(AcarinessMesostiomata)ina: coche hee aoe tes eee ae MENKE, A. S.—Three sphecid wasps previously unrecorded from Tahiti (Hymenop- CerasS DNECICAC) pete ere rege renee we es rer Ans Aen een a re Rar Ne Pee an A aCe RI eee oe NAKAHARA, S.—Pinnaspis caricis, new synonym of Pinnaspis aspidistrae (Homop- (IZING ADYEVSY OPAC FAVS) epee csetarees Pesce an a tse UE Oe mp Mt dre RDS OIE en AU A NEGROBOV, O. P.—Some new synonymy in the Dolichopodidae (Diptera) .......... NORTON, R. A.—The identity of Pelopsis nudiuscula (Acari: Oribatei) .............. SGHABRERAS Al — See slAM Tr Sli: saccire aera te eee pone ae loses STEYSKAL, G. C.—The gender of Nosopon Hopkins (Mallophaga) ................. STEYSKAL, G. C.—Lutzomyia vexator (Coquillett), the correct designation for Lutzo- Iuyiaayvexatrica Of authorss(Dipterasbsychodidae)i. cs... a... 4-145 soeee «sae ae eerre ee TAFT, S. J. and S. A. SCHAPER.—A survey of shore bird lice from two Wisconsin counties with a new host record for Lunaceps holophaeus (Mallophaga: Philopter- GREYS) NG Says BUSA oo MPT eet ROE OPE CRORE OST Te CRETE CSN CERI cr CIE RC Rtn TE ere ey ee 211 379 105 663 THRELFALL, W., C. E. BOURGEOIS, and G. A. BAIN.—Mallophaga from some North American Amatidaé: .. «6... 50% <6 ooo 5c sieelae- = ihieis ce tohe ereyeh nen aap news tmecr at eee tare 327 WHEELER, A. G., JR.—Further spread of the Palearctic Berytinus minor in North America (Hemiptera: Benytidae) a... ~rs< os 6-0 12rys «chef ois 08) tre eee eee 506 Book Review MATHIS, W. N.—Record of My Life-Work in Entomology, 1903-1904 .............. 330 Obituaries Frank Leslie Campbell—W. D. REED and. M. KOSZTARAB 3352. 9. s-nes ee eee 694 EnnestsNeal(@orys Sr — lal BISSEIE 2. 25 de ke eet ee ce eed See en At See ee ee 33) wgarobilla Clark (Sibinia (Microtychius)), 162 inisoforficata Parker and Voshell (Hydrop- tila), 43 intilleanus Evans (Nesepyris), 458 wchboldi Schmidt and Mickel (Dsaymutilla), 576 velkini de Meillon and Wirth (Forcipomyia (Phytohelea)), 198 vicavatus Evans (Dissomphalus), 280 latchleyi Henry (Ceratocapsus), 408 brasilianum Henry (Myiomma), 556 breviauris Slater (Patritius), 599 brevirostris Hambleton (Rhizoecus), 650 ‘apitatum Henry (Myiomma), 557 Caurininae Russell, 22 Caurinus Russell, 22 cecilsmithi Henry (Ceratocapsus), 409 citipes Krombein (Sclerogibba), 466 crataepus Summers and Schuster (Ac- rotocarus), 484 dectes Russell (Caurinus), 22 Dimorphomastax Shenefelt, 131 dominicana de Meillon and Wirth (For- cipomyia (Phytohelea)), 195 Ecnomios Mason, 640 ecuadorensis Mathis (Parascatella), 604 englemani Slater (Patritius), 594 folkertsi Wolfe and Matta (Hydroporus), 175 fuligineus Slater (Patritius), 596 fuliginosa Shenefelt (Bequartia), 129 fungosus Evans (Dissomphalus), 282 fusiforme Henry (Myiomma), 560 gilvipes Evans (Dissomphalus), 283 gramineus McDaniel, Norton, and Bolen (Torpacarus), 626 graminosus McDaniel, Norton, and Bolen (Pseudocryptacarus), 621 grisselli Evans (Anisepyris), 465 hastatus Evans (Dissomphalus), 281 helvola DeLong (Polana), 301 hirsutus Henry (Ceratocapsus), 410 hoogstraali Young (Cofana), 13 infuscatus Henry and Herring (Corticoris), 85 ischnodemoides Slater (Patritius), 595 Javanensis Wirth and Wada (Camptop- terohelea), 347 Jeanneae Wolfe and Matta (Hydroporus), 174 Jedarfa Young (Cofana), 15 Jenniferae Wolfe and Matta (Hydroporus), 171 Index to New Taxa, Volume 81 Karlissa Krombein, 428 knighti Henry (Ceratocapsus), 413 lata Young (Cofana), 18 luteipenne Flint and Bueno (Macronema), 532 maai Young (Cofana), 11 magnadens Reichart (Anisops), 447 maryae Warner (Eudiagogus), 305 mastuerzo Clark (Sibinia (Microtychius)), 157 medleri Young (Cofana), 19 megomphalus Evans (Dissomphalus), 279 melalbida DeLong (Polana), 301 melella DeLong (Polana), 302 meridensis Cermeli and Smith (Picturaphis venezuelensis), 617 mexicanum Henry (Myiomma), 561 mexicanus Henry and Herring (Corticoris), 87 napo. Evans (Dissomphalus), 282 nigellus Bohart (Ectemnius), 496 obliquus Evans (Dissomphalus), 279 ornatum Henry (Myiomma), 563 papuensis Mason (Ecnomios), 642 peculiaris Shenefelt (Dimorphomastax), 133 pedicellus Gordh and Hendrickson (Di- glyphus), 678 pellucida Greenfield and Karandinos (Paran- threne), 499 Physohelea Grogan and Wirth, 53 piceatus Henry (Ceratocapsus), 415 pogo Warner (Eudiagogus), 309 pojanii Cermeli and Smith (Picturaphis), 611 polaris Young (Cofana), 14 promisca Shenefelt (Bequartia), 131 Prosochaetini Barnes, 294 Pseudocryptacarus McDaniel, Norton, and Bolen, 621 pubescens Henry (Ceratocapsus), 417 putara DeLong (Polana), 298 rubrooculatum Henry (Myiomma), 563 sana DeLong (Polana), 299 schuhi Henry (Myiomma), 565 semipallidum Henry (Myiomma), 567 separata Young (Cofana), 12 sinclairi Lewis (Stenonema), 321 solida DeLong (Polana), 302 sotot Young (Cofana), 20 spangleri Mathis (Parascatella), 607 taprobanana Krombein (Sclerogibba), 473 tensicollis Triplehorn (Corticeus), 46 tintitaco Clark (Sibinia (Microtychius)), 160 tokunagai Wirth and Wada = (Camptop- terohelea), 349 tropica Méndez and Lemke (Myodopsylla), 657 tuberculatus Triplehorn (Corticeus), 48 tzaneenensis de Meillon and Wirth cipomyia (Phytohelea)), 184 vallensis Evans (Dissomphalus), 281 (For- variipenne Flint and Bueno (Macronema), 528 venezuclensis Cermeli and Smith (Pic- turaphis), 614 watlingensis Elliott and Salbert (Cerceris), 359 wheeleri Henry (Ceratocapsus), 421 vasumatsui Young (Cofana), 16 Zodia Heppner, 685 OL: Si JANUARY 1979 NO. 1 F*™ PROCEEDINGS of the NTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY of WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ENTOMOLOGY SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20560 PUBLISHED QUARTERLY ‘. Table of Contents Volume 81, Number 1, Proceedings ESW ‘ARLSON, R. W.—Seventy-three names validated in “Jchneumon” and **Evania”’ (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) in posthumously published letters written by “CHEIRSTTIES? sooth Eee CRG eI IEE Sean toe ee LEE A te he 70 ‘ADS, R. B., E. G. CAMPOS and A. M. BARNES.—New records for several flea (Siphonaptera) species in the United States, with observations on species parasitiz- igeecarmivoresin the Rocky Mountain Region :....)2-..c4..s.- +++ see sess eons 38 7OOTE, R. H.—Ischyropteron Bigot revisited (Diptera: Tephritidae)................. 97 JROGAN, W. L., JR. and W. W. WIRTH.—A new Neotropical genus of predaceous midges, with a key to the genera of Heteromyiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) ..... 51 TENRY, T. J. and J. L. HERRING.—Review of the genus Corticoris with descriptions of two new species from Mexico (Hemiptera: Miridae: Isometopinae) ............ 82 TENRY T. J. and A. G. WHEELER, JR.—Orthotylus translucens: Taxonomic status and correction of published misidentifications (Hemiptera: Miridae) .............. 60 HOY, M. A. and P. M. MARSH.—Breeding tests support synonymy of Apanteles melanoscelus and Apanteles solitarius (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)............... 75 but a centerhead: “‘koebelei, sp. nov.’ appears between “‘1. albida (Walker)? and **3. pasiphae, sp. nov.” One concludes that the description koebelei applies to the species “*2. per- kinsi sp. nov.’ of the key. Both names are available, but perkinsi has line priority. I have seen no specimens of this species from Australia (type- locality Cairns, Queensland), but I have based my determination on a spec- imen from Port Moresby, New Guinea that agrees with the original descrip- tion of koebelei and with Evans’ 1966a:144, Fig. 23D illustration. I have identified Tettigoniella spectra Distant in the sense of the lecto- type in BM. Distant proposed this name as a substitute name for Tettigonia 6 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON albida Signoret. But Signoret’s albida was merely a misdetermination of — the Walker species, not a separate proposal, and therefore not a homonym, and there was no type-series. Distant’s ‘‘new name”’ actually constituted a separate proposal, and I therefore designated a lectotype for spectra (Young, 1965:194). My identification of Tettigonia subvirescens Stal agrees with the lecto- type. This species is easily recognized by the somewhat coriaceous greenish forewings. At the time I designated the lectotype of Tettigonia unimaculata Signoret, I recognized the species as a close relative of Cofana spectra (Distant). Signoret pointed out the significance of the lack of an apical black spot on the head in his original description. Although some specimens of other species share this character (see key), it is important in species recognition. I have seen the types of the nominal species listed in synonymy in the accompanying list of species, except Kolla tripunctifrons Banks which Met- calf (1965:430) placed in Cofana. A specimen from Luzon determined by Melichar as tripunctifrons is the same as unimaculata Signoret. A number of authors have reported Cofana spectra (Distant) from eco- nomic plants including rice, barley, wheat, sugarcane and sorghum. Misra (1920a:229) reported it from grass. Esaki and Ito (1954a:16) reported it also from ‘‘rush’’ and from mulberry. But all this information needs to be verified in the light of refinements in our knowledge of species recognition. Clausen (1931a:45) reported C. subvirescens (Stal) from sugarcane. Most of these accounts fail to state that the species observed was very important econom- ically, even though feeding, or occurring on, economic plants. Undoubtedly several species occur commonly in paddies, and one apparently has been observed to oviposit on rice plants. Ishihara (1971:18) reported Yasumat- suus mimicus Distant (misdetermination = Cofana yasumatsui, new species described herein) as a pest of rice and illustrated the last instar nymphs. SPECIES OF COFANA albida (Walker), 1851b:767 (Tettigonia). Philippines: Palawan; Br. N. Bor- neo. NEW COMBINATION. eburnea (Walker), 1857b:168 (Tettigonia). Philippines: Luzon, Mindoro, Negros, Leyte, Palawan, Mindanao; Borneo: Br. N. Borneo, Sarawak; W. Sumatra. NEW COMBINATION. quinquenotata (Stal), 1870c:734 (Tettigonia). NEW SYNONYMY. whiteheadi (Distant), 1908f:142 (Tettigoniella). NEW SYNONYMY. fuscivenis (Bergroth), 1894a:2 (Tettigonia). Madagascar. NEW COMBI- NATION. grisea (Evans), 1955b:9 (Poecilocarda). Belgian Congo. NEW COMBI- NATION. VOLUME 81, NUMBER I 7 hoogstraali, NEW SPECIES. Dutch New Guinea, New Britain. jedarfa, NEW SPECIES. Belgian Congo, Uganda. lata, NEW SPECIES. S. China, Viet Nam, Java. lineata (Distant), 1908g:224 (Kolla). Nepal, NE. India, S. India, Ceylon, Java. NEW COMBINATION. maai, NEW SPECIES. NE. New Guinea. medleri, NEW SPECIES. Liberia, Nigeria, Chad, Gabon, Principe Is., Fr. Equatorial Africa, Belgian Congo, Rhodesia, Transvaal. nigrilinea (Stal), 1870c:735 (Tettigonia). Formosa; S. China; Viet Nam; S. India; N. and S. Malaya; Singapore; Sarawak; N. Borneo; Phillippines: Palawan, Negros, Mindanao; Dutch New Guinea; NE. New Guinea; Pa- pua; New Britain; Bougainville; Guadalcanal. NEW COMBINATION. perkinsi (Kirkaldy), 1906c:319 (Tettigonia). New Guinea: Papua; [Australia: Queensland]. NEW COMBINATION. koebelei (Kirkaldy) loc. cit. (Tettigonia). NEW SYNONYMY. polaris, NEW SPECIES. Liberia, Upper Volta, Nigeria, Belgian Congo. separata, NEW SPECIES. Is. of New Britain. —sotoi, NEW SPECIES. Sierra Leone. spectra (Distant), 1908g:211 (Tettigoniella). Fr. Equatorial Africa; Sen- egal; Sierra Leone; Liberia; Ghana; Nigeria; Cape Province; Natal; Trans- vaal; Chad; Rhodesia; Tanganyika; Uganda; Ethiopia; Eritrea; Yemen; Iran; W. Pakistan; Nepal; Sikkim; Formosa; S. China; Burma: Shan States, Tenasserim; Laos; Thailand; Viet Nam; Bengal; Calcutta; S. In- dia; Ceylon; Malaya; Java; Sumatra; Okinawa; Philippines: Luzon, Min- doro, Negros, Leyte, Palawan, Mindanao; N. Borneo; Sarawak; N. Ce- lebes; Dutch New Guinea, NE. New Guinea, Papua; Australia: N. Territory, Queensland; New Britain; New Caledonia; Fiji Is.; Guadalcan- al. NEW COMBINATION. subvirescens (Stal), 1870c:734 (Tettigonia). W. Pakistan; S. China; Ceylon; Viet Nam; Burma; Thailand; Malaya: Pahang, Malacca; Sumatra; Java; Philippines: Luzon, Negros, Misamis, Mindanao; New Guinea. NEW COMBINATION. unimaculata (Signoret), 1854a:26 (Tettigonia). Fr. Equatorial Africa; Senegal; Sierra Leone; Liberia; Ghana; Upper Volta; Nigeria; Br. Cam- eroons; Gabon; Belgian Congo; Uganda; Tanganyika; Northern Rhodesia; Transvaal; Natal; Madagascar; S. China; NE., NW. and S. India; Ceylon; Nepal; Formosa; Laos; Cambodia; Viet Nam; W. Pakistan; Burma: Ran- goon, Tenasserim; Malaya; Singapore; Java; Philippines: Luzon, Min- doro, Negros, Cebu, Samar, Palawan, Mindanao; Borneo: Dutch New Guinea; Australia: Queensland. NEW COMBINATION. punctum (Taschenberg), 1884a:445 (Tettigonia). NEW SYNONYMY. mimica (Distant), 1908g:225 (Kolla). NEW SYNONYMY. 8 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON Fig. 2. Cofana eburnea: a, anterior dorsum; b, head and pronotum, lateral view; c, female abdominal sternum VII (all from lectotype of Tettigonia quinquenotata Stal, from Philippine Islands). Fig. 3. Cofana maai: a, anterior dorsum; b, female abdominal sternum VII (both from holotype). Fig. 4. Cofana separata, anterior dorsum (holotype). Fig. 5. Cofana hoogs- traali, male: a, anterior dorsum; b, sternal abdominal apodemes (broken line represents con- junctiva) (from specimen from Dutch New Guinea ). Fig. 6. Cofana unimaculata: a, anterior dorsum; b, sternal abdominal apodemes of male (broken line represents conjunctiva) (from specimen from eastern Negros Island, Philippines); c, female abdominal sternum VII (from specimen from Gabon). VOLUME 81, NUMBER 1 9 tripunctifrons (Banks), 1910a:51 (Kolla). NEW SYNONYMY. differentialis (Baker), 1914a:420 (Tettigoniella). NEW SYNONYMY. hopinensis (Distant), 1918b:3 (Tettigoniella). NEW SYNONYMY. yasumatsui, NEW SPECIES. S. China, Viet Nam, Thailand, Sarawak, Bor- neo, Java. KEY TO SPECIES OF COFANA (C. grisea (Evans) and C. fuscivenis (Bergroth) not included) 1. Head with transocular width less than greatest width of pronotum — Head with transocular width equal to or greater than greatest width Glepronocimiere Satie eds Oe. Reel Aes PE ee ee a 3 2. Forewing with inner anteapical cell closed basally .............. ME hs ah scot sn Ra aera od oaks albida (Walker) -— Forewing with inner anteapical cell open basally (Fig. 2) ........ ey er RTT PI 5 cnt ois Sonn peer onosny ahs mails eburnea (Walker) 3. Crown with paired discal spots or with a discal transverse marking MEMES) Peers Teenie ent Late Peal. ais maai, new species — Crown with one discal spot or a longitudinal line, or without discal TPTLOTOVS ss sote otal 8 Ob SRMCRERS cotta ts Oa ae Meee Se pee CE RR NAPS TT OES ere RPE ES ee 4 ay Head without asmedianiapical black«¢spot. 42. 4)..600328 Sok Re, . 5 =e ilead witha median apical’ DIACK. SPOt: «cic cos sacs eres: aye od Geto sues tes onetas 9 5. Length of male 9.2 mm or more; of female 10 mm or more ........ 6 =~ wengthrot male 5.3—8:0 mms: or female-5:3=9:4 mm s...260 9.05 he. 7 6. Crown and pronotum dark, marked with yellow (New Britain) (Fig. AN RCP URE ADEA Gest lie i Paap: yl Ws hs ti) se separata, new species -— Crown and pronotum usually unmarked (crown rarely with a dark median discal spot) (New Britain and Dutch New Guinea) (Fig. 5) ME REO ere. CIR IME IE Slice So a BOA hoogstraali, new species 7. Head with a median pale spot at transition from crown to face ..... 8 -— Head without such a spot (Fig. 6)........... unimaculata (Signoret) 8. Pronotum and scutellum with a conspicuous dark line ........... OP Teak CIS AE Sacks ae ee Se LS Me cE polaris, new species = Pronotum and scutellum ‘unmarked ............ 02) sotoi, new species 9. Large specimens, length usually 10 mm or more; female abdominal sternum VII truncate apically but slightly convex medially (Fig. 7) 5 Ui SFOS SOT DOT ne ore ee ae ee PE subvirescens (Stal) — Without above combination of characters; length almost always LSS Seti Onin peck ether en etenns Se a aie ows SA NS CE 10 10. Crown with a median posterior longitudinal dark marking that con- tinues as a median pronotal dark stripe without interruption ...... 1] — Crown not so marked, with a broader median discal spot ......... 12 10 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON TA lie Fig. 7. Cofana subvirescens, lectotype: a, anterior dorsum; b, female abdominal sternum VII. Fig. 8. Cofana perkinsi, anterior dorsum (from specimen from Port Moresby, New Guin- ea). Fig. 9. Cofana jedarfa, holotype, anterior dorsum. Fig. 10. Cofana lineata: a, anterior dorsum; b, apodemes of male abdominal sternum II (from specimen from Kandy, Ceylon). Fig. 11. Cofana yasumatsui: a, holotype, aedeagus, lateral view; b, female abdominal sternum VII; c, female pygofer, lateral view; d, second valvula of ovipositor; e, teeth near base of second valvula; f, teeth near middle of same; g, apex of second valvula (b-—g from topotype). VOLUME 81, NUMBER 1 11 ia Ie: Lateral pronotal margins dark, in dorsal view (Papua, N. Australia) (BiCNS Ps peste. caeteeeN es oh aatiot shoei ens perkinsi (Kirkaldy) Lateral pronotal margins not dark-bordered in dorsal view (Central NGhICA) EGE IE:. 29); AES hese eee i eit tee lon Jedarfa, new species Head produced and triangular; specimens smaller (length of male 5.4-5.9 mm; of female 6.0-6.6 mm); head with median length °/10 interocular width or more; with a median pronotal line continuing ontoscutellumy(FigedO) ai: 22k coarsely punctured. Males of C. mexicanus are very distinct in having the medial portion of the basal abdominal sternum flattened and rugosely sculp- tured between and behind the metacoxae with a distinct median carina end- ing in a tubercle. In addition, there is a dense, conspicuous patch of short, pale setae on the prosternum immediately behind the head. These two struc- tures are absent in the female of C. mexicanus and in both sexes of C. tensicollis. Both structures were clearly visible on the cotype studied even though it was glued dorsal side up on a card. I have seen specimens of C. mexicanus from Mexico, Guatemala, Nica- ragua, Panama and Colombia. Corticeus tensicollis is more similar to C. rufipes (Fabricius) than to any other New World species. The two may be separated by several characters in addition to the male genitalia. Corticeus rufipes is usually larger (up to 10 mm in length), the eyes are separated ventrally by about 1.5 x the ventral diameter of one eye, and the elytral striae are better defined, at least 5 discal striae on each side of the suture situated in distinct sulci with convex elytral intervals. I have seen specimens of C. rufipes from Mexico, Guatemala, Costa Rica, Panama, British Honduras, Nicaragua, Venezuela, Bolivia, Brazil and Trin- idad. Corticeus tuberculatus Triplehorn, NEW SPECIES Figs. 2—3 Holotype, sex undetermined.—Elongate, stout, subcylindrical, dark red- dish brown, shining; dorsal surface with scattered, widely separated, erect, VOLUME 81, NUMBER 1 Fig. 1. Corticeus tensicollis, body outline in dorsal view. Figs. 2-3. C. tuberculatus. Body outline in dorsal view. 3, Left prothoracic leg. 49 5 50 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON pale setae. Head with clypeus trapezoidal, sides straight, finely crenulate and distinctly reflexed, anterior angles prominent, epistoma subtruncate with 2 small, almost contiguous marginal tubercles, 2 similar, slightly sep- arated tubercles at base of clypeus; interocular area smooth and shiny with 6 small tubercles; posterior portion of head coarsely and densely punctured, a transverse impression between eyes; antennae dark reddish brown, stout, subfusiform, segments 5-10 transverse, terminal segment narrower, elon- — gate, rounded apically; eyes moderate, coarsely faceted, separated ventrally by almost 2 the observed ventral diameter of one eye; ventral surface of head with a few coarse but very shallow punctures, transversely impressed between eyes. Pronotum large (0.6 length of elytra), strongly convex; lateral margins straight and divergent from base to apex, apical margin truncate, strongly and abruptly deflexed medially, angles finely acute and prominent, basal margin nearly straight, basal angles rounded; lateral and basal margins finely beaded; surface coarsely and deeply punctured, punctures well sep- arated on disc, much closer laterally, punctures more or less elliptical; lat- eral setae quite long. Elytra equal in width to base of pronotum, sides par- allel, surface shallowly punctate-striate, intervals flat and minutely punctulate; elytral setae vaguely arranged in longitudinal rows, best seen in anterior or posterior views, longest near lateral margins; pygidium very finely punctate. Ventral surface finely and densely punctured, somewhat alutaceous, especially metasternum; prosternal process narrow between coxae, strongly expanded behind, truncate apically; legs light reddish brown; profemur expanded apically, grooved ventrally for reception of pro- tibia; protibia expanded apically, outer margin strongly denticulate (Fig. 3); inner margin densely clothed with golden setae, apical spur large and strong- ly deflexed; dorsal surface of mesotibia finely denticulate; metatibia with large subapical tooth on dorsal surface. Length 3.5 mm; width 0.9 mm. Types.—Holotype and 5 paratypes, Cayamas, Cuba, 14 January (no year indicated), E. A. Schwarz, on ceiba; 2 paratypes, same locality and collector but 21 January. Holotype and paratypes in USNM: paratype in OSUC. Discussion.—There is not much variation in the type-series. Three of the specimens have a single epistomal tubercle instead of two and the number and arrangement of other tubercles on the head vary slightly (as few as 4 as in Fig. 2). The denticulations on the dorsal edge of the protibia are ir- regular, some large teeth and some small teeth on the same tibia, and with different combinations on the right and left tibia of a specimen. Measurements.—Length 3.2—3.7 mm; width 0.82—0.96 mm. This species has at least three unique characters, any one of which will distinguish it from all other known Corticeus in the Western Hemisphere: Head tuberculate, outer margin of profemur denticulate and anterior margin of pronotum deflexed. It is totally unlike any species known to me, and I am unable to speculate on its affinities. PROC. ENTOMOL. SOC. WASH. 81(1), 1979, pp. 51-59 A NEW NEOTROPICAL GENUS OF PREDACEOUS MIDGES, WITH A KEY TO THE GENERA OF HETEROMYIINI (DIPTERA: CERATOPOGONIDAE) WILLIAM L. GROGAN, JR. AND WILLIS W. WIRTH (WLG) Department of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742 (now at: Department of Biological Sciences, Salisbury State College, Salisbury, Maryland 21801); and (WWW) Systematic Ento- mology Laboratory, IIBIII, Agric. Res., Sci. and Educ. Admin., USDA, % U.S. National Museum, Washington, D.C. 20560. Abstract.—Physohelea, a new genus of predaceous midges of the tribe Heteromyiini, is described and illustrated. It includes the type-species, Neu- ‘ohelea oedidactyla Ingram and Macfie, from Argentina, and N. turgidipes [Ingram and Macfie, from Chile. A key and phylogeny are presented for the Heteromyiini, and phylogenetic relationships within the tribe are discussed. Ingram and Macfie (1931) described Neurohelea oedidactyla and N. tur- gidipes from Patagonia and South Chile, respectively. In their excellent paper they remarked that these two species resembled both Clinohelea Kief- fer and Neurohelea Kieffer in possessing a swollen front fifth tarsomere. They distinguished Clinohelea from these two species by: ‘“‘all femora are slender and unarmed, the costa is not prolonged beyond RS, the median fork is broadly sessile, and on the four posterior legs of the female the fourth tarsal segment is armed, and the claws are very unequal.’’ They concluded that these two species more closely resembled Neurohelea be- cause ‘‘the only difference to be found is apparently in the femora, all of which in Neurohelea are slender and unarmed. We have therefore referred the two speciese described here to this genus, assuming that, as only a single species is known, the armature of the femora may not be in this case a character of generic importance.”’ We consider the allocation of these two species to Neurohelea by Ingram and Macfie at the time a prudent decision. However, since the publication of their paper in 1931, another species of Neurohelea, N. nigra, has been described by Wirth (1952). An additional species, N. macroneura, originally described by Malloch (1915) in Johannsenomyia and later allocated to Neu- erohelea by Johannsen (1943), was apparently unknown to Ingram and Mac- fie. The type species of Neurohelea, N. luteitarsis (Meigen), occurs in the 52 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON Palaearctic Region while the above two species are Nearctic. These three species of Neurohelea are very similar morphologically with but minor dif- ferences at the species level, and it now appears that they comprise a rather well-defined genus, apparently Holarctic in distribution. Recently, we discovered in the material in the U.S. National Museum a specimen of Neurohelea turgidipes collected in Patagonia by R. and E. Shannon in 1926 on the same expedition during which F. and M. Edwards collected the type-series of N. turgidipes and N. oedidactyla. Unfortunately much of Shannon’s collection was not made available for study when the British Museum (Natural History) published its series on the Diptera of Patagonia and South Chile. Through the courtesy of Richard Lane and the trustees of the British Museum (Natural History), we were able to borrow the type-series of N. oedidactyla and N. turgidipes. The female holotypes of both species were mounted on slides in balsam by Ingram and Macfie and are in excellent condition. After comparing the type-material of N. oedi- dactyla and N. turgidipes with other species of Neurohelea, we feel it necessary to propose a new genus for them. In this paper we are also revising the recently published key (Wirth et al., 1974) to the tribe Heteromyiini, to include this new genus and to correct some problems in classification. In addition we are including a section on the phylogenetics of the Heteromyiini to elaborate on our evaluation of characters in this tribe. For an explanation of general terminology of Cer- atopogonidae see Wirth (1952) and Wirth et al. (1977). We are grateful to Ethel L. Grogan for preparing the illustrations. KEY TO THE GENERA OF HETEROMYIINI (FEMALES) 1. Media barely sessile, forking at level of r-m crossvein; fourth tar- Somerc ol hind les"corditonm: .%..gcesss hosts Shee ee oe je — Media broadly sessile, forking proximal to r-m crossvein; fourth tar- somere of hind leg bifid or greatly elongated, not cordiform ......... 4 tN . One radial cell; claws of hind leg without basal inner tooth ....... rah Earth estan ie aired See ah te a! bt Neurobezzia Wirth and Ratanaworabhan Two radial cells; claws of hind leg with basal inner tooth ........... 3) 3. Front femur bearing 5-12 spines; fifth tarsomere of front leg elon- gate, greatly inflated; claws moderately small, less than 4 length of iiiGhgtAarSOmMehe sw Me 2 seiih nests ie eee Physohelea, new genus — Front femur without spines; fifth tarsomere of front leg shorter than those of middle and hind legs, slightly inflated; claws moderately large, more than 2 of length of fifth tarsomeres .. Neurohelea Kieffer 4. Fourth and fifth tarsomeres of hind leg greatly elongated; hind claw PRCAUY CIONSALEC. wo-.gocscoe os es ae thee ee Ce ee eee 5 — Fourth tarsomere of hind leg bifid, spinose; fifth tarsomere of hind 53 VOLUME 81, NUMBER 1 leg about as long as those of front and middle legs; hind claw not PReALMVACOMPANCC epics cent ees ces Chia re cee eine Caalets Sinise ene aie state 7. . Front femur greatly swollen, bearing 20-30 spines; claws of front and middle legs with basal inner tooth .............. Heteromyia Say Front femur slender with less than five spines; claws of front and muadlewdess, withoutibasalipmmen tOOtn’ 21: oi 6 3... fi. aoe wl ste eye eee oi 6 Inner claw present on hind leg; fourth tarsomere of front and middle legs bitid, spimose:, wing fasciafe .. 2... ..2..06.%. Tetrabezzia Kieffer Inner claw absent on hind leg; fourth tarsomere of front and middle legs cordiform, without spines; wing hyaline .... Pellucidomyia Macfie . Claws of front leg unequal; eyes broadly contiguous ............ a6 oh Boo BOSE, Se ee ores Metahelea Edwards One radial cell; anterior scutal spine strongly developed .......... ic Seek pO es EES Sper UE le ene Ee err a Ceratobezzia Kieffer Two radial cells; anterior scutal spine poorly developed or absent 5 wie ue 6S Ae oc EE PER ec oO ee ee ee eee Clinohelea Kieffer Physohelea Grogan and Wirth, NEW GENUS Type-species, Neurohelea oedidactyla Ingram and Macfie, by present des- ignation. Diagnosis.—As genus of predaceous midges of the tribe Heteromyiini distinguished from all other ceratopogonid genera by the following combi- nation of characters: Fifth tarsomere of front leg elongate, greatly inflated; front femur slightly swollen and bearing 5S—12 spines; wing slightly infus- cated, with 2 radial cells, the costa extending beyond R4+5 to 0.87-0.91 of wing length; media barely sessile, forking at level of r-m crossvein; claws moderately small, less than % length of Sth tarsomeres, equal in size and possessing basal inner teeth; 4th tarsomeres cordiform. Male unknown. Physohelea keys to couplet 9, the tribe Heteromyiini, and couplet 36, Neurohelea Kieffer, in Wirth et al. (1974) but differs from that genus by several characters. Neurohelea has shorter, stouter legs and the front femur lacks spines, the front fifth tarsomere is shorter than the others and just slightly inflated, the claws are much longer, more than 12 the length of the fifth tarsomeres, the costa extends far beyond R4+5 to more than 0.97 of the wing length, and the flagellum is much shorter and stouter. Heteromyia Say differs from Physohelea in having a greatly swollen fore femur bearing 20-30 spines, fasciate wings with a broadly sessile media, hind fourth and fifth tarsomeres greatly elongated and hind claws greatly elongated. Neu- robezzia Wirth and Ratanaworabhan, the only other heteromyiine genus with a media forking at the level of the r-m crossvein, differs readily from Physohelea in having only a single radial cell. All other genera in the tribe 54 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON a iS SP Ne CP EB ES a Fig. 1. Physohelea oedidactyla, female. a, flagellum; b, palpus; c, wing; d, mandible; e, leg pattern; f, tarsi; g, fifth tarsomeres and claws. Heteromyliini differ from Physohelea in having a broadly sessile media and the hind fourth tarsomeres either greatly elongated or bifid and spinose. Etymology.—The generic name is a combination of Greek physo (inflat- ed) and heleios (marsh dweller) and refers to the characteristic inflated front fifth tarsomeres of this genus. VOLUME 81, NUMBER | 55 Physohelea oedidactyla (Ingram and Macfie), NEW COMBINATION Figs. 1, 2a Neurohelea oedidactyla Ingram and Macfie, 1931:212 (female; Argentina); Wirth, 1974:48 (in catalog of Neotropical Ceratopogonidae). — Diagnosis.—A species of Physohelea characterized by its dark brown legs with the proximal 2 of the front and middle femora and base of the hind femur yellowish; scutum brownish. Female.—For a complete description see Ingram and Macfie (1931). To that description may be added the following: Wing length 2.46 mm; breadth 0.86 mm. Antenna with lengths of flagellomeres (Fig. la) in proportion of 19-12-12-13-14-15-15-16-23-23-22-23-25; antennal ratio 1.00. Palpus (Fig. 1b) with lengths of segments in proportion of 7-8-15-9-15; palpal ratio 3.0. Man- dible (Fig. 1d) with 8-9 large coarse teeth on inner margin; outer margin with 3—4 small, widely-spaced teeth. Legs (Fig. le) with dark brown femora and tibiae except yellowish on proximal /% of front and middle femora and base of hind femur; front femur with 5—7 spines; tarsi (Fig. 1f) yellowish on proximal 3 tarsomeres, brown on distal 2 tarsomeres; Sth tarsomere of fore leg (Fig. 1g) elongated and greatly inflated, shorter and slender on middle and hind legs; claws small, equal sized, with basal inner teeth. Wing (Fig. Ic) slightly infuscated, surface with microtrichia only; 2 radial cells; costa extending beyond R4+5 to 0.87 of wing length; media barely sessile, forking at the level of r-m crossvein; cubitus forking at level of r-m crossvein. Abdomen with genitalia as in Fig. 2a; 9th sternum with truncate anterior margin; posterior margin cleft; 8th sternum with a pair of bifid arms; 10th sternum with a deeply cleft anterior margin and 6 pairs of large setae. Two or three small, spheroid, subequal spermathecae with narrow, moderately long necks, the largest measuring 0.067 by 0.052 mm. Male.—Unknown. Distribution.—Argentina; known only from the type-locality, which 1s plotted in Fig. 3. Type.—Holotype, female, Argentina, Rio Negro Province, Bariloche, December 1926, F. and M. Edwards, in British Museum (Natural History), London. Physohelea turgidipes (Ingram and Macfie), NEW COMBINATION Fig. 2b—c Neurohelea turgidipes Ingram and Macfie, 1931:214 (female; Chile); Wirth 1974:48 (in catalog of Neotropical Ceratopogonidae). Diagnosis.—A species of Physohelea very similar to P. oedidactyla but differing from that species by its mostly yellowish legs with the distal 4 of the femora and tibiae brown and with large yellowish anterolateral spots on the scutum. 56 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON Fig. 2. Physohelea oedidactyla and P. turgidipes, females. a, genitalia of P. oedidactyla; b and c, leg patterns and spermathecae, respectively, of P. turgidipes. Female.—For a complete description see Ingram and Macfie (1931). To that description may be added the following: Wing length 2.50—2.79 mm; breadth 0.86-0.90 mm. Antenna with lengths of flagellomeres in proportion of 19-13-13-14-14-15-17-17-26-27-26-26-26; antennal ratio 1.07—1.21. Palpus with lengths of segments in proportion of 6-9-13-7-15; palpal ratio 2.55—2.60. Legs (Fig. 2b) yellowish except brown on distal 4 of femora and tibiae; front femur with 6-12 spines. Costa of wing extending to 0.89-0.91 of wing length. Two slightly larger spermathecae (Fig. 2c), the largest measuring 0.076 by 0.055 mm. Male.—Unknown. Distribution.—Southern Chile; locality records plotted in Fig. 3. Type.—Holotype, female, Chile, Chiloe Province, Mechuque Island, 23 December 1926, F. and M. Edwards, in British Museum (Natural History), London. Additional Material Examined.—CHILE: Chiloe Province, Isla Chiloe, Ancud, December 1926, R. and E. Shannon, | female, on slide, in USNM. VOLUME 81, NUMBER 1 Sif Fig. 3. Locality records of Physohelea oedidactyla (open circle) and P. turgidipes (closed circles) in southern Chile and Argentina. PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS Downes (1977) has presented the only phylogenetic diagram of the tribes of the Ceratopogoninae to date. His diagram is rather simplified and is based to a large extent on the feeding habits, but we agree with its general ar- rangement and branching sequence of the tribes. Within the Cerotopogon- inae, Downes placed the Heteromyiini in that group in which the female captures and devours the male during the mating process. He also indicated from his diagram that the Heteromyiini arose from a Ceratopogonini-Stilo- bezziini ancestor. We believe that the Stilobezziini is probably the more logical ancestor of the Heteromyiini. Figure 4 presents a proposed phylogeny for the genera in the tribe Het- eromyiini. We believe that this tribe is a monophyletic group having in common apotypic character state 1, an inflated front fifth tarsomere. This character is better developed in some genera than in others; nevertheless, it along with some other apotypic characters indicates that the Heteromyiini are monophyletic in origin. Branch A in Fig. 4 includes Physohelea, Neurohelea and Neurobezzia, and these three genera are thought to be the most plesiotypic in the tribe. They share apotypic character state 2, a barely sessile media, that is, forking wa NEUROBEZZIA NEUROHELEA PHYSOREERE: HETEROMYIA PELLUCIDOMYIA TETRABEZZIA CERATOBEZZIA METAHELEA CLINOHELEA Fig. 4. Phylogeny of the genera in the tribe Heteromyiini. Apotypic character states are: 1, inflated Sth tarsomere of front leg; 2, media barely sessile, forking at level of r-m crossvein; 3, media broadly sessile, forking proximal to level of r-m crossvein; 4, greatly elongated hind 4th and Sth tarsomeres and claws; 5, bifid, spinose, hind 4th tarsomere. at the level of the r-m crossvein, and are the only genera in the family that possess this character. This character probably represents an intermediate condition between the plesiotypic petiolate media of the Stilobezziini and the broadly sessile media (apotypic character state 3) present in the other six genera in the Heteromyiini (branch B), and the Sphaeromiini, Palpo- myiini, and Stenoxenini. The genera in branch A also share several plesi- otypic characters such as the cordiform fourth tarsomeres and equal-sized 8 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON | VOLUME 81, NUMBER 1 59 claws usually with basal inner teeth. Heteromyia (branch C) is apparently the only other genus to have retained the plesiotypic condition of claws with basal inner teeth. Branch B in Fig. 4 includes in the Heteromyiini those genera which share apotypic character state 3, a broadly sessile media. This character is also found in all of the higher ceratopogonid genera, as stated previously. The genera in branch B exhibit several unusual modifications such as bifid, spi- nose fourth tarsomeres and greatly elongated hind claws, characters unique to the Heteromyiini. Branch C in Fig. 4 includes Heteromyia, Pellucidomyia and Tetrabezzia, all of which share apotypic character state 4, greatly elongated hind fourth and fifth tarsomeres and claws. These characters are unique to these three genera, which are apparently closely associated, and probably represent modifications for specialized feeding behavior. However, nothing is pres- ently known of the feeding or mating habits of these genera. Branch D in Fig. 4 includes Ceratobezzia, Metahelea and Clinohelea, all of which share apotypic character state 5, hind fourth tarsomere bifid and spinose. The fourth tarsomeres of the front and middle legs of Clinohelea and Metahelea, and the middle leg of Ceratobezzia, are bifid and spinose as well. These structures may be used for holding prey. Tetrabezzia (branch C) also has the fourth tarsomeres of the front and middle legs bifid and spinose. This may indicate that Tetrabezzia might have developed this char- acter independently from those genera in branch D or that branches C and D are paraphyletic. At present we are uncertain as to what sort of hind fifth tarsomere the ancestor of branches C and D possessed. We may be better able to determine the relationships of these two groups if new characters are discovered or when we know more of their biologies. LITERATURE CITED Downes, J. A. 1977. Evolution of feeding habits in Ceratopogonidae. Mosquito News 37:279- 280. Ingram, A. and J. W. S. Macfie. 1931. Ceratopogonidae. Diptera of Patagonia and South Chile, Part II, Fascicle 4, pp. 155-232. ,; Johannsen, O. A. 1943. A generic synopsis of the Ceratopogonidae (Heleidae) of the Americas, a bibliography, and a list of the North American species. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 36:763-791. Malloch. J. R. 1915. The Chironomidae or midges of Illinois. Bull. Ill. State Lab. Nat. Hist. 10:213-243. Wirth, W. W. 1952. The Heleidae of California. Univ. Calif. Publ. Entomol. 9:95—266. 1974. A catalogue of the Diptera of the Americas south of the United States. 14. Family Ceratopogonidae, pp. 1-89. Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. Wirth, W. W., N. C. Ratanaworabhan and F. S. Blanton. 1974. Synopsis of the genera of Ceratopogonidae (Diptera). Ann. Parasitol. Hum. Comp. 49:595-613. Wirth, W. W., N. C. Ratanaworabhan and D. H. Messersmith. 1977. Natural history of Plummers Island, Maryland. XXII. Biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). |. Intro- duction and key to genera. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 90:6 15-647. PROC. ENTOMOL. SOC. WASH. 81(1), 1979, pp. 60-63 ORTHOTYLUS TRANSLUCENS: TAXONOMIC STATUS AND CORRECTION OF PUBLISHED MISIDENTIFICATIONS (HEMIPTERA: MIRIDAE)! THOMAS J. HENRY AND A. G. WHEELER, JR. The Frost Entomological Museum, Department of Entomology, Pennsyl- vania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802 (mailing ad- dress: Bureau of Plant Industry, Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120). Abstract.—The type-specimen of Orthotylus translucens Tucker 1907 has been examined. Although the condition of the type is poor, we are following Kelton and are regarding Tucker’s species as a junior synonym of Diaph- nocoris provancheri (Burque). Records of O. translucens in faunal lists prob- ably should refer to D. pellucida (Uhler) and D. ulmi (Knight), as well as to D. provancheri. Published host records from onion and mesquite refer to Labopidea allii Knight and Orthotylus vigilax Van Duzee, respectively. Elbert S. Tucker was F. H. Snow’s student and museum assistant at the University of Kansas during the early years of this century (Hyder, 1953). He published a number of papers on economic entomology while employed as a special field agent by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. From ex- tensive spare-time collecting he amassed considerable material from Colo- rado, Kansas, Louisiana and Texas and helped to catalogue the insects of Kansas. He identified much of his own material but usually had specialists verify his determinations. Tucker felt sufficiently confident to describe sev- eral new species of Diptera and Hymenoptera; his taxonomic work in He- miptera was limited to the 1907 description of a new mirid, Orthotylus translucens. Tucker described O. translucens from a male he collected in July 1894 near Colorado Springs, Colorado, which O. Heidemann had noted was most closely related to the European O. prasinus (Fallén). Tucker hesitated to | describe a new species based on a single specimen but did so ‘‘to avoid — listing a species as unknown.”’ In helping to complete the mirid fascicle for the forthcoming catalogue of 1 Authorized for publication May 24, 1978 as paper no. 5521 in the Journal Seri2s of the Pennsylvania Agricultural Experiment Station. A contribution from the Frost Entomological Museum (AES Project 2070). VOLUME 81, NUMBER 1 61 the Hemiptera of America north of Mexico, we found that there is confusion surrounding the identity of Tucker’s species. We discovered that Van Duzee (1916) had redescribed translucens without examining Tucker’s type-spec- imen; that H. H. Knight at one time confused translucens with related orthotyline mirids; that the host plant records published under the name O. translucens by Glenn (1923) and Jones (1932) probably were based on mis- identifications; and that Kelton (1965) synonymized translucens under ~Diaphnocoris provancheri (Burque) without indicating whether he had seen Tucker’s type. We have examined the type and the specimens of Glenn, Jones, Knight and Van Duzee in order to clarify the taxonomic status of O. translucens and to correct published host plant records based on misiden- tifications. TUCKER’S TYPE AND METATYPES Dr. P. D. Ashlock, Department of Entomology, University of Kansas, kindly permitted us to borrow Tucker’s type-specimen from the Snow En- ‘tomological Museum. The specimen is badly faded with little hint of green and no fuscous tinge; its condition is poor. The antennae (except the right Ist segment) are missing and the genitalia are glued to a 2nd point be- neath the specimen, but only the right paramere is visible. The specimen is suggestive of Diaphnocoris provancheri, or D. pellucida (Uhler), but as pointed out by Kelton (1965), these two species are at best difficult to sep- arate. Kelton (1965) synonymized translucens under D. provancheri, prob- ably as a practical way to dispose of a long troublesome name and appar- ently without studying the Tucker type-specimen. Tucker’s specimen clearly belongs in the genus Diaphnocoris, and its general form most closely resembles specimens determined as D. provancheri from the eastern U.S. Because of its poor condition, it is impossible to identify the type with certainty; Tucker’s specimen may well represent a species distinct from other known Diaphnocoris. We believe it best, however, to follow Kelton’s disposition of translucens owing to the condition of Tucker’s type-speci- men. Tucker’s metatypes, four females collected at Kansas City, Missouri, May 13 and 20, could not be located. His description of this green ortho- tyline mirid strongly suggests the honeylocust plant bug, D. chlorionis (Say), based on the short rostrum (failing to attain mesocoxae), antennae (III-IV infuscated), and membrane (very slightly dusky). The collection of the metatypes from ‘‘trunks of locust trees’’ further supports our conclusion if the host indeed was honeylocust rather than black locust. VAN DUZEE’S AND KNIGHT’S CONCEPT OF ORTHOTYLUS TRANSLUCENS In his 1916 monograph of the genus Orthotylus in North America, Van Duzee redescribed O. translucens based on a pair collected at Buffalo, New York and two males taken at Elma, New York (near Buffalo). He did not ex- 62 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON amine Tucker’s type but thought that based on the original description he had correctly placed Tucker’s species. Van Duzee’s specimens from Buffalo (6- 27-08) and Elma (Aug-25-12) were located in the collection of the California Academy of Sciences and were borrowed through the courtesy of Dr. P. H. Arnaud, Jr. These specimens cannot be referred to either D. pellucida or D. provancheri or to the similar-appearing D. chlorionis. Van Duzee’s spec- imens appear to be D. ulmi (Knight). H. H. Knight apparently was unsure of the identity of O. translucens and did not include Tucker’s species in his major works of 1923, 1941 and 1968. He did, however, occasionally identify specimens as translucens. In ma- terial submitted by C. J. Drake and H. Osborn from their survey of the Hemiptera of Cranberry Lake, New York, Knight identified D. pellucida, D. provancheri, and O. translucens?, all taken on yellow birch (Betula lutea) at Barber Point during July and August. He also identified translucens from Batavia, New York (Knight, 1928) and Raleigh, North Carolina (Brim- ley, 1938). In addition, his personal collection, now housed at the U.S. National Museum of Natural History (USNM), contains a series of speci- mens standing under the name O. translucens. Three species comprise this series: D. pellucida, D. provancheri, and D. ulmi. The specimen from Law- rence, Kansas, noted by Knight (1922) to be closely related to translucens but evidently undescribed, appears to be D. pellucida. Host PLANT RECORDS BASED ON MISIDENTIFICATIONS Glenn (1923) reported on seasonal history, damage and control of a mirid on wild garlic and cultivated onions in the vicinity of Olney, Illinois. C. S. Spooner misidentified Glenn’s species as O. translucens. In the family Mir- idae we were aware of only Allium spp. serving as hosts of Labopidea spp. We located a specimen from Olney (June 1915, on onion) in the USNM collection that Knight had determined as L. allii. Knight (1941) lists L. allii from Olney, Illinois. Jones (1932), based on Van Duzee’s determination, recorded O. translu- cens from mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa and P. velutina) in southeastern Arizona. He reported that feeding by large numbers of mirids apparently was responsible for failure of a large percentage of leaves and flowers to develop on time. Some of his specimens from Cochise Co., Arizona, labeled ‘ex. mesquite,’’ have been borrowed from the California Academy of Sci- ences; the species fits the description of O. vigilax Van Duzee. Knight (1968) reported O. vigilax from mesquite in California. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We are grateful to P. D. Ashlock, University of Kansas, for permitting us to borrow the Tucker type-specimen and to P. H. Arnaud, Jr., California Academy of Sciences, for the loan of Van Duzee’s specimens. We thank R. | VOLUME 81, NUMBER 1 63 C. Froeschner, Department of Entomology, Smithsonian Institution, for allowing us to examine specimens in the H. H. Knight collection and J. L. Herring, Systematic Entomology Laboratory, I[BIII USDA, c/o U.S. Na- tional Museum, for letting us examine specimens under his care. K. C. Kim, Pennsylvania State University, kindly reviewed the manuscript and en- dorsed it for publication. LITERATURE CITED Brimley, C. S. 1938. The insects of North Carolina. N.C. Dept. Agric., Div. Entomol., Ra- leigh. 560 pp. Glenn, P. A. 1923. The onion capsid, Orthotylus translucens Tucker. J. Econ. Entomol. 16: 79-81. Hyder, C. K. 1953. Snow of Kansas. Univ. Kans. Press, Lawrence. 296 pp. Jones, W. W. 1932. Mesquite injured by Orthotylus translucens Tucker in Arizona. J. Econ. Entomol. 25:136. Kelton, L. A. 1965. Diaphnidia Uhler and Diaphnocoris Kelton in North America (Hemiptera: Miridae). Can. Entomol. 97:1025—1030. Knight, H. H. 1922. Nearctic records for species of Miridae known heretofore only from the Palearctic Region (Heterop.). Can. Entomol. 53:280-288. —. 1923. Family Miridae (Capsidae). Pages 422-658. In Britton, W. E. (ed). The He- miptera or sucking insects of Connecticut. Conn. Geol. Nat. Hist. Surv. Bull. 34. ——.. 1928. Family Miridae. Pages 110-134. Jn Leonard, M. D. (ed). A list of the insects of New York. Cornell Univ. Agric. Exp. Stn. Mem. 101. . 1941. The plant bugs, or Miridae, of Illinois. Bull. Ill. Nat. Hist. Surv. 22. 234 pp. —. 1968. Taxonomic review: Miridae of the Nevada Test Site and the western United States. Brigham Young Univ. Sci. Bull. Biol. Ser. 9(3):1—282. Tucker, E. S. 1907. Some results of desultory collecting of insects in Kansas and Colorado. List of Hemiptera Heteroptera. Kans. Univ. Sci. Bull. 4:51-62. Van Duzee, E. P. 1916. Monograph of the North American species of Orthotylus (Hemiptera). Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. (4) 6:87—128. PROC. ENTOMOL. SOC. WASH. 81(1), 1979, pp. 64-69 DESCRIPTION OF THE NYMPH OF OPHIOGOMPHUS HOWEI (ODONATA: GOMPHIDAE) JAMES H. KENNEDY AND HAROLD B. WHITE III (JHK) Department of Biology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061; and (HBW) Department of Chem- istry, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19711. Abstract.—The nymph of the little known dragonfly Ophiogomphus how- ei Bromley is described for the first time. It is distinguished from other members of the genus by its small size (19.0—22.5 mm in length), the absence of dorsal hooks and the vestigal nature or absence of lateral spines on ab- dominal segment 7. The geographical range of O. howei is extended from the Susquehanna River in Pennsylvania to the New River in Virginia and North Carolina where it is a significant component of the benthic fauna. The nymphal habitat, species associations, food preference and emergence patterns are reported along with some observations of adult behavior. The holotype description of Ophiogomphus howei Bromley (1924) was made based on one female adult. Likewise, Calvert (1924) described the male of O. howei based on one specimen. Until its recent discovery in a section of the New River in Virginia only one other O. howei specimen had been recorded since the original descriptions. This was a teneral female taken in 1967 from the Susquehanna River near Halstead, Pennsylvania (Thomas W. Donnelly, personal communication). Despite the fact that O. howei has been one of the most sought after species in North America it has eluded collectors and its nymph has remained undescribed for over 50 years (M. J. Westfall, personal communication). As part of a study to determine species composition of the benthic in- vertebrate fauna in the New River, a mature Ophiogomphus nymph was collected in December 1976, a few meters upstream of St. Rt. 721 bridge, Carroll County, Virginia. The nymph was reared in facilities at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; and in February 1977, a female O. howei emerged. Additional nymphs were reared and the exuviae were conspecific with exuviae collected from the Susquehanna River near Hal- | stead, Pennsylvania. The morphological terminology given by Corbet (1953) and Snodgrass (1954) is used in the following description of the O. howei | nymph. | VOLUME 81, NUMBER | 65 Mature Nymph.—Body length 19.0-22.5 mm (20.5 aver.), abdominal width 5.6-6.1 mm (5.6 aver.), head width 4.5—4.9 mm (4.7 aver.). In general the mature nymph Is a greenish brown. Earlier instars have more of a yellowish-brown body. Preserved nymphs are a light brown. Body is covered with coarse cuticular granules. There are 4 antennal segments. The length to width ratio of antennal segment 3 is less than 2.0 (1.86—-1.95). The labium is as shown in Fig. 2A. The distal margin of the median lobe is evenly arcuate with 32-36 blunt teeth and 61-68 piliform setae. The distal margin of each palpus possesses 11-13 rectangular dentations. Setae are present on lateral margins of the thorax. Wing pads, 4.5—5.0 mm long, extend to the base of abdominal seg- ment 4. The legs have prominent setae present on femora, tibia and tarsal segments. Abdominal tergal segments 2-9 in profile are somewhat arched longitu- dinally with a blunt rounded apical projection but no dorsal prominences (Fig. 2B). The abdominal terga in addition to well-marked submedian and lateral rows of spots have a dark pigmented blotch on segment 6. This characteristic may fade in preserved specimens. Subequali lateral spines are present on segment 8-9. A lateral spine may weakly be present on abdom- inal segment 7. Cerci are slightly less than % of the epiproct length. Cerci basal width is approximately % their length. The nymph of O. howei is easily distinguished from all other Ophiogom- phus nymphs by its small size and lack of any dorsal hooks or prominences. The absence of a lateral spine on segment 7 is also diagnostic for this species. However, this trait is variable and in approximately 40% of the examined specimens a weak spine was present. Material examined.—6 nymphs and 26 last instar exuviae from Virginia Carroll Co., New River, near Galax. 10 last instar exuviae from North Carolina: Alleghany Co., New River. 4 exuviae from Pennsylvania: Sus- quehanna Co., Susquehanna River. Last instar exuviae and adult specimens have been deposited in U.S. National Museum, Washington, D.C.; Florida State Collection Insects and Arthropods, Gainesville, Florida; Department of Entomology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafeyette, Indiana; and Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Range.—Nymphs and adults of O. howei were collected from a 39.1 km section of the New River which flows through North Carolina (Alleghany Co.) and Virginia (Grayson, Carroll Co.). Elevation ranges from 732 m (2400 ft) to 640 m (2100 ft) above sea level in this area. The New River near Galax, Virginia (36°39.5'N, 80°59’W) is a site nearly central to the distribution of O. howei. Exuviae were also collected from the Susquehanna River in Penn- sylvania (Susquehanna Co., 41°57.5'N, 75°40’W). The original descriptions 66 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON Fig. 1. Ophiogomphus howei, dorsal view. of the adults were from specimens taken in Amherst, Massachusetts and Lemoyne, Pennsylvania near the Connecticut and Susquehanna Rivers, re- spectively. Ecology.—Nymphs were found in sand and gravel in swiftly flowing water. The average annual flow of the New River near Galax, Virginia is 51 m?/sec. The New River is approximately 200 m wide and 0.30 m deep in this section. The flow, depth, width and substrate characteristics of the VOLUME 81, NUMBER 1 67 + 5mm ——__ Fig. 2. Ophiogomphus howei. A, Labium (note % piliform setae are deleted to show tooth structure of median lobe). B, Abdomen, lateral view. 68 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON Susquehanna River near Halstead, Pennsylvania are similar to the New River. Physical and chemical properties of the New River within the distribution range of O. howei were monitored monthly from 1970 to 1975 at three locations. Ranges of selected physical and chemical parameters are as fol- lows: Calcium, 2.00-6.50 ppm; magnesium, 0.80—-2.10 ppm; sulfate 0.00- 7.40 ppm; chloride, 0.30-5.40 ppm; pH, 6.10—8.45; hardness, 9.90—22.40; Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) 0.01-6.15 ppm; and nitrate 0.304—3.49 ppm. Dissolved oxygen (D.O.) was always near the saturation point. Water quality in this area of the New River is excellent because the drainage basin has few major industrial sites (Benfield and Cairns, 1974). Comparable water chemistry data from the Susquehanna River are not available. However, two spot surveys done by the Pennsylvania Fish Commission indicate the Susquehanna has a greater hardness (46-82 ppm) (Clark Shiffer, personal communication). Further reliable comparisons between the New and Sus- quehanna Rivers are not possible. Odonata nymphs sympatric with O. howei in both the Susquehanna and New rivers included Gomphus (Gomphurus) vastus Walsh, G. (Tylurus) spiniceps Walsh, Macromia illinoiensis Walsh and Neurocordulia yamas- kanensis Provancher. Ophiogomphus rupinsulensis (Walsh) was associated with O. howei in the Susquehanna and Ophiogomphus aspersus Morse in the New River. Emergence on the New River in 1977 began 30 April and continued through the first part of May. Peak emergence occurred 4—S May. The last exuviae were picked up 15 May 1977. Ophiogomphus howei emergence in 1978 began 21 May 1978. Water temperature at the time of emergence in 1977 and 1978 was approximately 19°C. The nymphs were observed climbing out of the river and up vertical mud banks. Emergence either occurred while clinging to the exposed mud bank or in the grassy vegetation on the top of the bank. Emergence occurred between early morning and early afternoon. Teneral O. howei kept alive up to seven days have yellow markings. They are devoid of the green thoracic coloration typical of other eastern species of Ophiogomphus. Foregut contents of 5 O. howei mid-instar nymphs collected during the summer of 1977 revealed water mites (Arachnida: Acari: Prostigmata) may- fly nymphs (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) and midge larvae (Diptera: Chiron- omidae: Tanytarsini). Two distinct size classes of O. howei were collected from the New River suggesting a 2 year life cycle. Adults are strong fliers and were observed migrating into trees after emer- gence. Active O. howei adults were observed 7-10 m high in trees in the late afternoons until dusk. Ovipositing was not observed in the New River. However, adults were observed to leave their perches high in trees and fly | VOLUME 81, NUMBER I 69 very fast over the surface of the Susquehanna River late in the afternoon (Thomas W. Donnelly, personal communication). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Boris Kondratieff and Steve Berte assisted in the field collection of adult and nymphal material. Clark Shiffer of the Pennsylvania Fish Commission and Ernest F. Benfield provided water chemistry data of the Susquehanna and New River respectively. Thomas W. Donnelly shared his observation on the Susquehanna population of O. howei and Reese J. Voshell critically reviewed this manuscript and offered many useful suggestions. Appalachian Power Company provided funds that partially supported this project. LITERATURE CITED Benfield, E. F. and J. Cairns. 1974. Pre-impoundment ecological reconnaissance of the New River in the area of the proposed APCO Blue Ridge Project. Three year report CES, VPI & SU, Blacksburg, VA. Bromley, S. W. 1924. A new Ophiogomphus (Aeschnidae: Odonata) from Massachusetts. Entomol. News 35(10):343-344. Calvert, P. S. 1924. The supposed male of Ophiogomphus howei Bromely (Odon.: Aeschni- dae). Entomol. News 35(10):345—347. Corbet, P. S. 1953. A terminology for the labrium of larval Odonata. Entomologist (London). 86: 191-196. Snodgrass, R. E. 1954. The dragonfly larvae. Smithson. Misc. Collect. 123(2):3-38. PROC. ENTOMOL. SOC. WASH. 81(1), 1979, pp. 70-74 — SEVENTY-THREE NAMES VALIDATED IN ‘“‘ICHNEUMON”’ AND ‘“EVANIA”’”’? (HYMENOPTERA: ICHNEUMONIDAE) IN POSTHUMOUSLY PUBLISHED LETTERS WRITTEN BY CUVIER ROBERT W. CARLSON Systematic Entomology Laboratory, IIBIII, Agric. Res., Sci. and Educ. Admin., USDA, % U.S. National Museum, Washington, D.C. 20560. Abstract.—Dalla Torre did not catalog the names of “‘Jchneumon’’ and ‘*Evania’’ species which were validated in 1833 in posthumously published letters written by Cuvier in 1790 and 1791. Those Cuvier names are listed and discussed (homonymy, etc.) for the convenience of systematists not having ready access to Sherborn’s Index Animalium. No names of well- known species are junior primary homonyms of the Cuvier names discussed. However, such is not the case for all of the junior primary homonyms which Dalla Torre neglected to suppress. Consequently, it is important for Hy- menopterists producing comprehensive catalogs or revisions to consult Sherborn’s Index Animalium. Following the death of Georges Cuvier in 1832, two letters which he had written to P. I. Hartmann in 1790 and 1791 were sent by G. L. Duvernoy to G. Silbermann, founder and editor of Revue Entomologique. Silbermann thought the letters to be of historical interest with respect to the beginning of Cuvier’s career (Cuvier wrote the letters at age 21) as an extraordinary scientist; and, accordingly, he published them in Revue Entomologique (Cuvier, 1833a and 1833b). Although some of the names validated by virtue of publication of those letters pertain to Coleoptera (Carabidae and Staphy- linidae), the majority (73) apply to an assortment of Ichneumonoidea, Chal- coidea and Proctotrupoidea. The Ichneumonoidea were described in Ich- neumon (68 species) and the Chalcidoidea and Proctotrupoidea were described in Evania (5 species). Cuvier’s collection is apparently no longer in existence. | None of the names of Cuvier (1833a and 1833b) were cited in the pertinent volumes of Dalla Torre’s Catalogus Hymenopterorum (1898a, 1898b, 1901- 1902). Dalla Torre’s (1898b:297) citation of “‘“Evania Silbermann’’ in the synonymy for Torymus would appear to indicate that Dalla Torre was aware of the Cuvier names but regarded them as unavailable. I encountered the Cuvier names in Sherborn (1902, 1922-1933), in the process of checking for VOLUME 81, NUMBER 1 71 homonymy of names treated by Carlson (in press). Because Sherborn’s volumes would not be readily available to many taxonomists working with parasitic Hymenoptera, it seems worthwhile to present a summary of the information I have assembled concerning Cuvier’s (1833a and 1833b) names of Hymenoptera. Following the alphabetized specific names are enumera- tions of the pages on which they occur in volume | of Revue Entomologique and parenthetical comments on the status of the names. Listing the literature citations for the original descriptions of the homonyms or synonyms dis- cussed would unnecessarily lengthen this paper; accordingly, most of those citations are not listed. Ichneumon: affinis, p. 158 (preoccupied by Fabricius, 1793); anonymus, p. 203 (preoccupies Heinrich, 1961); 7. aaonymus Heinrich ts being replaced by Carlson [in press, p. 522]); ‘‘apectator, L. F.,”’ p. 160 (lapsus for assec- tator Linnaeus); armillatorius, p. 156 (preoccupied by Gravenhorst, 1807, and Thunberg, 1822); armillatus, p. 203 (preoccupies Wesmael, 1845; J. armillatus Wesmael is apparently a species of Cratichneumon [see Hellen, 1946, p. 2-3] for which the female is not yet known); autumnalis, p. 157; barbatus, p. 207; bicolo, p. 157 (presumably not the intended spelling); bicultrator, p. 208 (as ‘‘bicultratorem, noblis|’; nomen nudum, because name regarded by Cuvier as a synonym of J. ‘‘formicator’’ Linnaeus [lapsus for formicatus]); bipunctatus, p. 203 (preoccupied by Gmelin, 1790); bra- chiacanthos, p. 210; brachigaster, p. 210; cadomensis, p. 156; carduorum, p. 158; cerasi, p. 203 (preoccupied by Linnaeus, 1771); cinctus, p. 158 and 203 (preoccupied by Linnaeus, 1758, and Geoffroy, 1775); coecus, p. 209; cognator, p. 156 (preoccupied by Thunberg, 1822); crassipes, p. 159 (preoc- cupied by Sern 1785, Rossi; 1790; and Gmelin, 1790); cyanops, p. 207; dimidius, p. 159; elegans, p. 205 (preoccupied by Gravenhorst, 1829); er- ytrostoma, a 206 (presumably not the intended spelling); femoralis, p. 205 (preoccupied by Geoffroy, 1785); femorator, p. 156 (preoccupied by Fabri- cius, 1793 and Kirby, 1802); fimetarius, p. 206; gallicanus, p. 201; Geoffroi, p. 157 Gunior objective synonym [n. syn.] of J. vorax ae by virtue of Wuviers statement “Syn. :). . "Geoff: Ichn. 52;”” a reference to species 52 of Geoffroy [1762, p. 344], which Geoffroy [1785, p. 411] named vorax; the latter name may correctly apply to Pterocormus discriminator |Wesmael]); globosus, p. 210; Hartmanni, p. 157; humeralis, p. 206 (preoccupied by Lichtenstein, 1796; regarding the status of the names of Lichtenstein [1796], see Bohart and Menke [1976, p. 117]); incrassatus, p. 204; latepetiolatus, p. 204; lateralis, p. 206 (preoccupies Kriechbaumer, 1887; according to Constantineanu [1959, p. 812-814] J. lateralis Kriechbaumer is a species of Barichneumon that is known only from the male); /eucogaster, p. 209; leucospis, p. 202; lucidus, p. 159; luctuosus, p. 208 (preoccupied by Grav- enhorst, 1820); macroceros, p. 210; Marschallii, p. 207 (nomen nudum), maxillosus, p. 204; melanostygma, p. 207 (apparently preoccupies melan- 72 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON ostigma Kriechbaumer, 1882, if article 58 (2) of the ‘“‘Code’’ [Stoll et al., 1964, p. 57] is heeded; according to Aubert [1962, p. 126], melanostigma Kriechbaumer is a junior synonym of Pterocormus novemalbatus [Kriech- baumer], the latter being misspelled nonoalbatus by Aubert); militator, p. 206; nanus, p. 208 (preoccupies Ratzburg, 1848 and Cresson, 1877; /. nanus Cresson and its replacement name, Amblyteles nanodes Cushman, are ju- nior synonyms of Cratichneumon scitulus [Cresson]; I. nanus Ratzburg is apparently a nomen dubium); nebulosus, p. 208; normannicus, p. 157; och- ropsis, p. 202; ochropus, p. 204 (preoccupied by Gmelin, 1790); orthacan- thos, p. 210; pallifrons, p. 204 (preoccupied by Gravenhorst, 1829); pector- alis, p. 159 (preoccupied by Say, 1829); personatus, p. 207 (preoccupied by Gravenhorst, 1829); pictus, p. 207 (preoccupied by Schrank, 1776 and Gme- lin, 1790); proximus, p. 207; psetosus, p. 205 (as psetosi, genitive case in Latin text); 4-dentatus, p. 203 (nomen nudum); recentissimus, p. 202; re- curvicauda, p. 206; romenilianus, p. 209; rufescens, p. 209 (preoccupied by Retzius, 1783; Gmelin, 1790; and Rossi, 1794); ruficollis, p. 20S (preoccupies Stephens, 1835; J. ruficollis Stephens is a junior synonym of Barichneumon — sanguinator [Rossi]); rufoscutellatus, p. 205; scutellorius, p. 156; semicau- | datus, p. 206; sequanensis, p. 204; serratularum, p. 203; stuttgardiensis, — p. 156; tricolor, p. 205 (preoccupied by Schrank, 1776 and Fabricius, 1793); tristis, p. 158 (preoccupied by Gravenhorst, 1829); vallemontanus, p. 202; varius, p. 209 (preoccupied by Pontoppidan, 1763; Miiller, 1776; Gmelin, 1790 [two species] and Fabricius, 1793); vicinus, p. 204 (preoccupies Boyer de Fonscolombe, 1847; and Cresson, 1864; the disposition of J. vicinus B. de F. is to be decided by Dr. Klaus Horstmann in a forthcoming paper; regarding J. vicinus Cresson, see Carlson [in press, p. 528]); wurtemburgi- cus, p. 157; xanthoceros, p. 208. Evania: cynipedis, p. 154 and fig. 12; clavicornis, p. 153 and fig. 7; po- dagraria, p. 152 and fig. 6; saltatrix, p. 152 (unnecessary new name for Vespa minuta Linnaeus); subclavata, p. 153 and fig. 8. Twenty-one of the Cuvier (1833) names which were validated in [chneu- mon are junior primary homonyms. Seven of them are senior primary hom- onyms, and all of the junior homonyms in these cases are presently sup- pressed in synonymy, are nomina dubia, or pertain to species that are little known and of indefinite taxonomic status. Consequently, I have not proposed replacement names for any of them here. It seems appropriate to point out here that Dalla Torre disregarded pri- mary homonymies in cases for which two or more primary homonyms had been subsequently placed in different genera or families. In most of these cases of primary homonymy, the senior homonyms, at least, were usually validated before 1850 and can, therefore, be found in Sherborn (1902, 1922— 1933). Incognizance of the need for consulting Sherborn’s volumes is illus- trated by two examples (many could be cited) from recent catalogs: 1) —=— eS SSS nee ree ie a ee eee ee ee eee VOLUME 81, NUMBER 1 73 Townes and Townes (1973, p. 236) failed to suppress the name Ichneumon rubidus Tosquinet, 1896, which is preoccupied by Rossi, 1794; 2) Shenefelt (1974, p. 1076) failed to suppress Ichneumon circulator Gravenhorst, 1807, which is preoccupied by Panzer, 1801. Is it now too late for those who are able to begin using the remarkable compendium which Sherborn completed 45 years ago? ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank George Steyskal for assistance in interpreting parts of Cuvier’s letters. Arnold Menke’s constructive criticism of the manuscript is greatly appreciated. LITERATURE CITED Aubert, J.-F. 1962. Les Ichneumonides du rivage Méditerranéen Frangais (4° Serie, alpes- maritimes) (1). Rev. Fr. Entomol. 29:124-153. Bohart, R. M. and A. S. Menke. 1976. Sphecid wasps of the world, a generic revision. Univ. California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London. ix + 695 pp. Carlson, R. W. In press. Ichneumonidae, Stephanidae, Evanioidea, and Trigonalidae; pp. 315-740, 740-741, 1109-1118, and 1197-1198, respectively. Jn. K. V. Krombein, P. D. Hurd, D. R. Smith and B. D. Burks [ed.], Catalog of Hymenoptera in America north of Mexico. Smithsonian Press, Washington, D.C. Constantineanu, M. I. 1959. Familia Ichneumonidae, subfamilia Ichneumoninae, tribul Ich- neumoninae stenopneusticae. Fauna Republicii Populare Romine, Insecta, v. 9, fasc. 4. Academiei Republicii Populare Romine. Bucarest. 1248 pp. Cuvier, G. L. C. D. 1833a. Lettres sur l’entomologie. Rev. Entomol. 1:143-160, 1 pl. (14 figs.). . 1833b. Deuxieme lettre sur l’entomologie. Rev. Entomol. 1:193-210, 1 pl. (7 figs.). Dalla Torre, K W. v. 1898a. Catalogus Hymenopterorum hucusque descriptorum systematicus et synonymicus, v. 4 (Braconidae). Guilelmé Englemann. Leipzig. 323 pp. ——. 1898b. Catalogus Hymenopterorum hucusque descriptorum systematicus et synony- micus, v. 5 (Chalcidoidea and Proctotrupoidea). Guilelmé Englemann. Leipzig. 598 pp. — . 1901-1902. Catalogus Hymenopterorum hucusque descriptorum systematicus et syn- onymicus, v. 3 (pts. 1 and 2; Trigonalidae, Megalyridae, Stephanidae, Ichneumonidae, Evaniioidea, Pelecinidae). Guilelmé Englemann. Leipzig. vill + 1141 pp. Geoffroy, E. L. 1762. Histoire abrégée des insectes qui se trouevent aux environs de Paris, dans laquelle ces animaux sont rangés suivant un ordre méthodique, v. 2. Durand. Paris. 690 pp. —. 1785. In A. F. de Fourcroy [ed.], entomologia parisiensis, sive catalogus insectorum, quae in agro parisiensi reperiuntur, secundum methodum Geoffraeanum in sectiones genera et species distributa, v. 2. Paris. 311 pp. Hellen, W. 1946. Zur Ichneumonidenfauna Finnlands (Hym.) V. Notulae Entomol. 26:1-12. Lichtenstein, A. A. H. 1796. Catalogus museu zoologici ditissimi Hamburgi III Febr. 1796 | auctionis lege distrahendi, sect. 3 (Insecta). G. F. Schniebes. Hamburg. 222 pp. Shenefelt, R. D. 1974. Jn J. van der Vecht and R. D. Shenefelt [ed.], Hymenopterorum catalogus, pars 11, Braconidae 7 (Alysiinae). W. Junk, ’s-Gravenhage. 76 pp. Sherborn, C. D. 1902. Index animalium, sive index nomenum quae ab A. D. MDCCL VIII generibus et speciebus animalium imposita sunt, sect. 1 (1758 to 1800 A.D.). Cambridge University Press. London. ix + 1195 pp. 1922-1933. Index animalium, sive index nomenum quae ab A.D. MDCCLVIII ge- 74 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON neribus et speciebus animalium imposita sunt, sect. 2 (1800 to 1850 A.D.). Trustees of the British Museum London. cxxxi + 7056 pp. and (epilogue) cxlvii + 1098 pp. Stoll, N. R. (Chairman), R. Ph. Dollfuss, J. Forest, N. D. Riley, C. W. Sabrosky, C. W. Wright, R. V. Melville, Editorial Committee, International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, 1964. International code of zoological nomenclature adopted by the XV International Congress of Zoology, ed. 2. International Trust for Zoological Nomencla- ture, London. 176 pp. Townes, H. K. and M. C. Townes. 1973. A catalogue and reclassification of the Ethiopian Ichneumonidae. Mem. Amer. Entomol. Inst. 19, iv + 416 pp. PROC. ENTOMOL. SOC. WASH. 81(1), 1979, pp. 75-81 BREEDING TESTS SUPPORT SYNONYMY OF APANTELES MELANOSCELUS AND APANTELES SOLITARIUS (HYMENOPTERA: BRACONIDAE) MARJORIE A. HOY AND PAUL M. MARSH (MAH) USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, 151 Sanford Street, Hamden, Connecticut 06514 (present address: Depart- ment of Entomological Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, Cali- fornia 94720); and (PMM) Systematic Entomology Laboratory, IIBIII, Agric. Res., Sci, and Educ. Admin., USDA, % U.S. National Museum, Washington, D.C. 20560. Abstract.—The satin moth (Stilpnotia salicis (L.)) and the gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar (L.)) were accidentally introduced into North America. Classical biological control projects led to the introduction of two closely related braconid parasites, Apanteles solitarius (Ratzeburg) and A. mela- noscelus (Ratzeburg), which were recently synonymized. Hybridization tests were conducted to confirm this synonymy with an A. solitarius colony collected from the satin moth in British Columbia in 1975 and an A. mela- noscelus colony collected from the gypsy moth in Connecticut. Mating oc- cured readily under laboratory conditions, and fertile hybrid female progeny were produced in the F, and the backcross generations. The satin moth (Stilpnotia salicis (L.)) and the gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar (L.)) are exotic pests and have been the targets of classical biological control programs in North America, but with differing results (Burgess and Crossman, 1927; Howard and Fiske, 1911; Crossman, 1922; Jones et al., 1938; Brown, 1931; Reeks and Smith, 1956; and Dowden, 1962). The effort against the satin moth has been considered successful (McGugan and Cop- pel, 1962); the current impact of the satin moth in the northeastern United States is insignificant, whereas the gypsy moth remains a significant prob- lem. One approach that might yield improved control of the gypsy moth is genetic improvement of a parasite through hybridization of different geo- graphical strains (Hoy, 1975a and 1975b). — Apanteles melanoscelus (Ratzeburg) was introduced into New England from Europe in 1911. It is primarily a parasite of gypsy moth larvae but occasionally attacks other moths including the satin moth. In 1927, a species of Apanteles determined as solitarius (Ratzeburg) was also introduced into New England from Europe. This species is primarily a parasite of the satin 76 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON moth but is apparently able to develop on the gypsy moth in the laboratory. From the earliest days of the gypsy moth and satin moth programs there has been confusion about the identities of these two Apanteles species (Par-_ ker, 1935). Specialists in braconid taxonomy have always had difficulty in distinguishing melanoscelus from solitarius, and in 1974 the two species were synonymized on the basis of morphological characters (Nixon, 1974). Breeding tests either have not been done or, when done (Parker, 1935), did not provide the sex ratios of the progeny which are necessary in arrheno- tokous species. Therefore we hybridized in the laboratory two colonies obtained from geographically distant sources to determine if these colonies were repro- ductively isolated or whether solitarius could provide an additional gene pool for incorporation into a breeding program of melanoscelus (Hoy, 1975a and 1975b). MATERIALS AND METHODS Colony Sources and Culture Methods.—The breeding tests were con- ducted with an A. melanoscelus colony from Connecticut (CT) collected from and maintained on the gypsy moth. The A. solitarius colony (SOL) from the satin moth was received from British Columbia as cocoons in June 1975. After adults emerged, they were allowed to mate and were given gypsy moth hosts, which they readily parasitized. The colony was subsequently maintained on gypsy moth hosts. This colony (SOL) was classified solitarius on the basis of its original host and its geographic source. A few overwin- tering A. solitarius cocoons collected by D. E. Leonard from satin moth hosts in Maine provided three females that were also crossed with CT col- ony males. Rearing of A. solitarius and A. melanoscelus was conducted as previously described (Hoy, 1975a), except that 20 to 25 host larvae were reared in 16 oz. untreated paper food cartons with clear plastic lids, rather than in petri dishes. Breeding Experiments.—Crosses were made with virgin females isolated as cocoons in No. 000 Lilly! gelatin capsules. Newly emerged females were placed into 16 oz. containers with honey, water, and males for mating. After two days, females were given hosts at least twice during their lifetime. At least 10 reciprocal crosses were made between the CT and SOL colonies. Data obtained for individual females included the number of progeny and the F, sex ratio. Virgin F, females were obtained and were used for recip- rocal backcrosses. Again, sex ratio and number of progeny were obtained for each female. 1 The use of trade, firm, or corporation names is for the information and convenience of the reader and does not imply endorsement or approval by the Forest Service or the Department of Agriculture. VOLUME 81, NUMBER 1 7 Figs. 1-4. Dorsal view of abdominal terga 2 and 3. 1, Specimen determined as Apanteles solitarius from gypsy moth in Massachusetts, 1927, yellow hind femur. 2, Specimen determined as A. solitarius from satin moth in Massachusetts, 1930, yellow hind femur. 3, Specimen determined as A. melanoscelus from gypsy moth in Massachusetts, 1930, black hind femur. 4, Specimen determined as A. solitarius from satin moth in Hungary, 1926, yellow hind femur. Morphological Examinations.—After crosses had been made and progeny obtained, adult CT and SOL parasites and their F, and backcross progeny were preserved in 70% alcohol and studied for morphological variability. Traits particularly examined included the color of the hind femur and the degree of sculpturing on the second and third abdominal terga. About 500 78 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON | Table 1. Hybridization of Apanteles melanoscelus and A. solitarius. Cross Cross Number of Number of crosses % females from No. 6 x 2 crosses yielding females total progeny 1 Cw sx. Cr 11 9 79 2 SOLSSOE 10 9 54 3 CI $< SOIL 36 14 59.8 4 SOL x CT 29 12 40.4 5 Ci Type No. 75225). Paratype: 1 2, Mexico, 4.3 mi northeast Ixtapan, July 6, | 1974, Clark, Murry, Ashe and Schaffner collectors (TAM). | Remarks.—Females of C. infuscatus most closely resemble C. signatus in wing pattern but can be separated by the tendency of the fuscous marks on the corium to fade apically and into the embolium. The narrow vertex, the more elongate form of the eyes and proclivity for the base of the head to overlap the anterior margin of the pronotum suggest a close relationship with C. pulchellus. Corticoris libertus (Gibson) Fig. 11 Isometopus libertus Gibson, 1917:76. Dendroscirtus libertus, Bergroth, 1924:8. Corticoris libertus, McAtee and Malloch, 1924:79. Holotype.—@, length 2.30 mm, width 1.12 mm, generally testaceous with fuscous on the head, pronotum and hemelytra; clothed with recumbent pale setae. Head: Length 0.26 mm, width 0.72 mm, fuscous, pale or testaceous between eyes through ocelli and through antennal bases; front clothed with VOLUME 81, NUMBER 1 87 silvery, silky pubescence; vertex across ocelli 0.26 mm, across posterior margin 0.36 mm; dorsal width of eye 0.23 mm; ocelli 0.18 mm apart, 0.16 mm from posterior margin of head. Rostrum: Length 1.26 mm, fuscous, reaching to 3rd abdominal segment. Antennae: I, length 0.10 mm, fuscous; II, length 0.54 mm, fuscous, apex pale; II] and IV broken. Pronotum: Length 0.40 mm, width at base 0.98 mm, fuscous, testaceous on posterior 2, lateral margins straight, basal margin nearly straight, weakly indented on either side of me- dian line. Calli and disc separated by deeply impressed line, calli raised, shiny, smooth, disc black punctured; mesoscutum fuscous, scutellum shiny, testaceous, basal 2 slightly more brown (scutellum uniformly testaceous in Arizona specimen), median area depressed, weakly rugose. Hemelytra: Shiny, testaceous, apical “3 of corium and narrow area through apical 4% of embolium fuscous, clothed with recumbent, golden setae; cuneus fuscous, paracuneus pale or testaceous; membrane fumate (darker than in C. uwnicol- or). Venter: Shiny, fuscous to black, ventral margin of procoxal cleft pale, -ostiolar peritreme fuscous. Legs: Fuscous, apices of femora and tibiae pale; tarsi and claws fuscous. Specimens Examined.—Arizona: | °, Richfield, 8-7-1902 (USNM). New Mexico: | 2 (holotype), Las Vegas HS, 14-8, Barber and Schwarz colls., USNM Type No. 21592. Remarks.—McAtee and Malloch (1924) suggested that C. libertus might be a color form of C. unicolor. After closely remeasuring and comparing the holotype and one additional specimen of C. libertus with C. unicolor and other members of the genus, we find C. /ibertus distinct. Corticoris libertus can be separated from C. unicolor by the largely tes- taceous dorsum (including the scutellum), the fuscous apical 3 of the corium, the darker membrane and the more slender form. This species is most similar to mexicanus but may be separated by the darker membrane, the uniformly fuscous venter, the largely fuscous head and legs, the more deeply punctured pronotal disc and the nearly straight basal margin of the pronotum. Corticoris mexicanus Henry and Herring, NEW SPECIES Fig: 1 Holotype.—@, length 2.24 mm, width 1.10 mm, generally testaceous and distinctly marked with black, clothed with pale to golden pubescence. Head: Length 0.26 mm, width 0.66 mm, testaceous, impunctate, tylus and area be- tween antennal bases and eyes shiny black, front and vertex set with silvery recumbent setae; vertex 0.28 mm across ocelli, 0.32 mm across posterior margin; dorsal width of eye 0.20 mm; ocelli 0.18 mm apart, 0.08 mm from posterior margin. Rostrum: Length about 1.04 mm, testaceous, apical seg- ment fuscous, reaching 2nd or 3rd abdominal segment. Antennae: |, length 0.10 mm, fuscous, apex pale; II length 0.56 mm, brown to fuscous on ventral aspect, pale or testaceous on dorsal aspect, curved and gradually enlarged to 88 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON- : apex; III, length 0.18 mm, fuscous; IV, length 0.14 mm, fuscous. Pronotum; Length 0.40 mm, width at base 0.92 mm, anterior margin and lateral margins” straight, basal margin strongly emarginate on either side of median line, dis¢ punctate; testaceous, calli and a wide vitta extending back on either side of disc shiny black, dark areas clothed with silvery, silky pubescence. Meso- scutum black, scutellum shiny black, apex testaceous. Hemelytra: Pale to testaceous, clavus fuscous, pale along corial margin and apical “3, embolium wide, largely fuscous along subcostal vein and across apical 2 of corium; cuneus translucent, inside 2 fuscous, paracuneus testaceous; membrane and veins smoky or fumate. Venter: Largely testaceous, pleura black, testaceous posteriorly and along hind margin of coxal cleft, sternum and anterior margins of abdominal segments fuscous. Legs: Largely pale to testaceous, coxae pale, bases lightly infuscated; femora pale, apical ’% with a broad fuscous ring; tibiae brown, darker on basal /%, tarsi and claws brownish. Type.—Holotype 2, Mexico, Oaxaca, 3.2 mi S. of Ocotlan, July 20, 1974, Clark, Murray, Ashe and Schaffner collectors (USNM Type No. 75226). Remarks.—Corticoris mexicanus is most similar to C. libertus but can be separated by the testaceous head with the fuscous tylus, the distinctly emar- ginate basal margin of the pronotum, the black scutellum having only the apex pale, the largely testaceous venter and the more finely punctured pronotal disc. Corticoris pulchellus (Heidemann) Figs. 3-6 Isometopus pulchellus Heidemann, 1908:128. Corticoris pulchellus, McAtee and Malloch, 1922:95. Dendroscirtus pulchellus, Bergroth, 1924:8. Female.—Length 2.30 mm, width 1.18 mm, suboval, more slender than C. signatus, head and pronotum dark with hemelytra pale. Head: Length 0.22 mm, width 0.56 mm, shiny black, front finely punctate, clothed with suberect black to brown setae; posterior margin largely overlapping anterior margin of pronotum; vertex 0.18 mm across ocelli, 0.20 mm across posterior margin; dorsal width of eye 0.16 mm, distinctly emarginate behind ocelli; ocelli 0.10 mm apart, 0.10 mm from posterior margin of head. Rostrum: Length about 1.04 mm, pale, segments 3 and 4 brown, reaching 3rd abdominal segment. Antennae: I, length 0.10 mm, black, not visible from dorsal aspect; I, length 0.54 mm, apical 4% pale, sometimes with a fuscous annulis; III, length 0.16 mm, fuscous; IV, length 0.14 mm, fuscous. Pronotum: Length 0.40 mm, width at base 0.96 mm, shiny black, disc finely punctate, calli smooth, shiny, lateral margins weakly rounded, base weakly emarginate on either side of median line, set with fine recumbent, brown setae. Mesoscutum and scutel- lum shiny black, middle and base of scutellum somewhat depressed, middle weakly rugose. Hemelytra: Opaque white to off-white, basal ’% and extreme apex of clavus black, a black spot at apex of corium just above paracuneus, ~VOLUME 81, NUMBER 1 89 Figs. 3-6. Corticoris pulchellus. 3, Female habitus. 4, Male habitus. 5, Left paramere, lat- eral view. 6, Right paramere, lateral view. 90 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF onan cuneus pale; membrane opaque white, veins distinct. Venter: Shiny black, ostiolar peritreme and abdominal segments invaded by white, especially gen+ ital segments. Legs: Coxae pale or white, base lightly infuscated; femora pale or white; tibiae testaceous, paler apically; tarsi and claws testaceous. Male.—Length 2.44 mm, width about 0.92 mm (wings spread); very similar to females in color and markings, except for the fuscous cuneus. As in all Corticoris males, the general body form is longer but more slender, the head is more slender, the eyes and ocelli are proportionately larger than in females, and the antennae are considerably more thickened. Head: Length 0.20 mm, width 0.56 mm; vertex across ocelli 0.18 mm, across posterior margin 0.22. mm; dorsal width of eye 0.18 mm; ocelli 0.12 mm apart, 0.06 from posterior | margin. Rostrum: Length about 0.98 mm (bent). Antennae: I, length 0.08 mm; II, length 0.64 mm, apical width about 0.08 mm, pale to testaceous, api- cal ring indistinct, thickly pubescent; III, length 0.12 mm; IV, length 0.14 mm. Pronotum: Length 0.38 mm, width at base 0.92 mm. Specimens Examined.—lIllinois: 1 2, Pulaski, June 28, 1909, cypress swamp, W. L. McAtee collection (USNM). New York: | 2, Long Island (USNM). Pennsylvania: 1 2, Bedford Co., Aug. 24(USNM); 3 @, State Col- lege, Centre Co., Aug. 5, 1975, D. J. Shetlar coll., taken on trunk of sugar maple, Acer saccharum (PDA); 1 2, State College, Centre Co., Sept. 8, 1976. D. J. Shetlar coll., taken on trunk of sugar maple (PDA); | ¢, State College Centre Co., July 13, 1977, A. G. Wheeler, Jr. coll. on trunk of Acer saccha- rum (PDA). Virginia: 2? (holotype), Falls Church, Aug. 2, N. Banks collec- tion, USNM Type No. 11368; 2 2, same data as holotype, July 27 (USNM). West Virginia: | 2, Aurora, Aug. 3, 1904, O. Heidemann (USNM). Remarks.—Corticoris pulchellus can be separated from other Corticoris by the black head and thorax and white hemelytra having fuscous markings only at the base and apex of the clavus and apex of corium. Corticoris signatus (Heidemann) Figs. 7-10 Isometopus signatus Heidemann, 1908:129. Dendroscirtus signatus, Bergroth, 1924:8. Corticoris signatus, McAtee and Malloch, 1924:79. Holotype.—®, length 2.24 mm, width 1.10 mm, generally black, suboval species, with fuscous on white hemelytra, clothed with erect and suberect pale pubescence. Head: Length 0.24 mm, width 0.64 mm, black, shiny, area between and posterior to ocelli pale, front punctate; vertex 0.26 mm across — Figs. 7-10. Corticoris signatus. 7, Female habitus. 8, Male habitus. 9, Left paramere, lat- eral view. 10, Right paramere, lateral view. ~VOLUME 81, NUMBER I 91 92 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON Fig. 11. Corticoris libertus, female habitus. ocelli, 0.34 mm across posterior margin; dorsal width of eye 0.20 mm, emar- ginate behind ocelli; ocelli 0.18 mm apart, 0.08 mm from posterior margin of head. Rostrum: Length about 1.24 mm reaching near 3rd abdominal segment. Antennae: I, length 0.10 mm, black, apical 4% pale, visible from dorsal aspect; II, length 0.50 mm, fuscous to black on ventral aspect, dorsal aspect pale; III, and IV broken (both segments black on other specimens). Pronotum: Length 0.40 mm, width at base 0.94 mm, shiny black, calli shiny, smooth and raised, lateral margin weakly rounded, anterior and posterior margins nearly straight, posterior angles pale. Mesoscutum and scutellum shiny black. Hemelytra: Opaque white, embolium wide, translucent, lateral edge black-margined; cla- vus pale, black at base and apex and frequently along inner margin to near apex of scutellum; corium pale, black at base and across middle; cuneus black, pale at base; membrane smoky translucent, veins indistinct. Venter: Shiny black, ostiolar peritreme pale. Legs: Yellowish, bases of coxae infus- cated; femora pale with subapical black band; tibiae brownish, more black on basal 2; tarsi and claws fuscous. Male.—Length 2.84 mm, width 0.64 mm. Head: Length 0.18 mm, width 0.70 mm, coloration much as in females; vertex 0.30 mm across ocelli, 0.34 mm across posterior margin; dorsal width of eye 0.22 mm, ocelli 0.20 mm apart, 0.10 mm from posterior margin of head. Rostrum: Length 1.32 mm, VOLUME 81, NUMBER 1 93 | reaching 3rd abdominal segment. Antennae: I, length 0.10 mm, black, paler * extreme apex; II, length 0.90 mm, width at apex 0.10 mm, testaceous to fuscous, thickly pubescent; III, length 0.12 mm, fuscous; IV, length 0.10 mm, fuscous. Pronotum: Length 0.44 mm, width at base 1.10 mm, shiny black, lateral margins flattened but more narrowly than in females. Mesoscutum and scutellum shiny black. Specimens Examined.—District of Columbia: | 2, 29-7. P. R. Uhler col- lection (USNM). Florida: | 2, Ormond, Mrs. A. T. Slosson, Ac 26226 (FSCA); 1 Sth-instar nymph, DeLeon Spring, C. R. Roberts coll., 5-II-1958, citrus paradise (FSCA). Pennsylvania: | ¢, 4 2, Lancaster Co., Erb Bros. Nurs., June 3, 1976, J. F. Stimmel coll., taken on Quercus palustris (PDA); i 6, 15 2, Lancaster Co., Erb Bros: Nurs., June 7, 1976, T. J. Henry and A. G. Wheeler, Jr. colls., taken on Quercus palustris infested with obscure scale (PDA); 4 ¢, Dauphin Co., Harrisburg, 2301 North Cameron St. (Agr. Bldg.), June 28, 1976, K. McIntosh, coll., taken on Quercus coccinea (PDA); 4 2°, Lancaster Co., Lancaster, June 11, 1977, R. T. Schuh and A. G. Wheel- er, Jr. colls., on Quercus palustris infested with obscure scale (PDA); 3 2, Centre Co., University Park, July 13, 1977, A. G. Wheeler Jr. coll., on trunk of Quercus borealis (PDA). Texas: 1 2 (holotype) San Diego, 29-4, E. A. Schwarz coll., USNM Type No. 11364; 1 2, San Diego, 25-5 (with label An- canthiodes (Isometopus signata OH. ms. Uhler)) (USNM); 1 2, Beeville, 22- 4,P.R. Uhler collection(USNM); 3 2, Goliad, E. A. Schwarz coll. (USNM); 1 2, Victoria, 10-4, E. A. Schwarz coll. (USNM); | @, Sabinal, IV-1910, Pierce and Pratt coll. (USNM); 1 @, Gillespie Co., V-6-1946, D. J. and J. N. Knull colls. (USNM). Remarks.—Corticoris signatus (Fig. 7) closely resembles C. infuscatus (Fig. 2) but is separated by the distinct hemelytral markings, broader head, wider vertex and pale femora. The size of C. signatus varies. Specimens from Pennsylvania, especially those of the Ist generation, are larger than those from the southern states (Florida and Texas), yet the two size forms appear conspecific. Corticoris unicolor (Heidemann) Figs. 12-13 TIsometopus unicolor Heidemann, 1908: 130. Myiomma media Gibson, 1917:75. Dendroscirtus unicolor, Bergroth, 1924:8. Corticoris unicolor, McAtee and Malloch, 1924:79. Holotype.— 2 , length 2.38 mm, width 1.34 mm; broadly rounded, generally uniformly dark brown, clothed with erect and suberect, golden pubescence. Head: Length 0.24 mm, width 0.70 mm, dark brown, area along posterior margin, between ocelli and compound eyes and area around and between Figs. 12-13. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON Corticoris unicolor. 12, Female habitus. 13, Male habitus. VOLUME 81, NUMBER 1 95 antennal bases testaceous, front clothed with recumbent, silvery setae; ver- tex across ocelli 0.28 mm, across posterior margin 0.40 mm; dorsal width of eye 0.22 mm; ocelli 0.18 mm apart, 0.08 mm from posterior margin of head. Rostrum: Length about 1.28 mm, dark brown, reaching 3rd or 4th abdominal segment. Antennae: I, length 0.12 mm, dark brown; II, length 0.62 mm, brown darker on apical 4% and base, apex pale; II] and IV broken. Pronotum: Length 0.42 mm, width at base 1.10 mm, shiny, dark brown, basal angles paler, calli and disc separated by a deeply impressed line, impressed area expanded laterally, lateral margins weakly flattened (less than in other species). Mesoscutum and scutellum shiny, dark brown. Hemelytra: Uni- formly dark brown, corium somewhat lighter; cuneus dark brown, apical more translucent; membrane fumate to dark translucent brown, veins simi- larly colored. Venter: Shiny, dark brown, sternum lighter brown, ostiorlar peritreme testaceous. Legs: Coxae light brown or testaceous; femora dark brown, apices pale to testaceous; tibiae fuscous, gradually paler towards apex, apex pale; tarsi and claws brown to fuscous. Male.—(holotype of Myiomma media), length about 2.60 mm, (membrane bent under), width 1.20 mm; form similar to males of C. pulchellus and C. signatus, general color much as in females (dark brown, not distinctly black as in other species). Head: Length 0.18 mm, width 0.72 mm, distinctly dark brown as in females, tylus and sides more reddish brown; vertex 0.24 mm across ocelli, 0.34 mm across posterior margin; dorsal width of eye 0.24 mm; ocelli 0.16 mm apart, nearly touching inside margin of eyes, 0.08 mm from posterior margin of head. Rostrum: Broken on holotype (Mexican specimen: Length 1.24 mm, reaching 3rd or 4th abdominal segment). Antennae: Broken on holotype (Mexican specimen: I, length 0.10, black; II, 0.88 mm, fuscous to black, extreme apex pale; II] and IV broken). Pronotum: Length 0.41 mm, width at base 1.00 mm, dark brown, lateral margins flattened, more widely on basal 43, mesoscutum and scutellum dark brown. Hemelytra: Translucent brown, darker brown of clavus, apex of corium and cuneus. Venter: Reddish brown. Legs: Broken, except for reddish-brown front femur (Mexican spec- imen: Femora brown, hind femora darker, apices pale, tinged with red; tibiae brown, paler apically; tarsi and claws brown). Specimens Examined.—8 @ (including holotype, USNM Type No. 11370), Williams, Arizona, July 27, Barber and Schwarz collectors (USNM). 1 6 (holotype of M. media, USNM Type No. 21591), Williams, Arizona, Aug. 7, Barber and Schwarz collectors. 1 6, 2 2, Mexico, Durango, 2 mi N. of Cerro Gordo, 6600’, VII-1-1971, O’ Briens, Marshall and Brothers coll., taken on Prosopis (Mesquite Project) (TTU). Remarks.—We have examined two females and one male of C. wnicolor collected together on Prosopis (Ward, et al., 1977 as Corticoris sp.) and |Gibson’s type of Myiomma media and can now safely agree with McAtee | and Malloch (1924) that M. media is actually a male of C. wnicolor. 96 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON Corticoris unicolor is one of the easiest Corticoris to recognize; the unt formly dark brown color and broad form distinguish this species. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank D. E. Foster (TTU), F. W. Mead (FSCA) and J. C. Schaffner (TAM) for kindly lending specimens used in this study; and A. G. Wheeler, Jr. (PDA) for reading the manuscript and making useful comments. LITERATURE CITED Bergroth, E. 1924. On the Isometopidae (Hem. Het.) of North America. Not. Entomol. 4:3-9. Eyles, A. C. 1971. List of Isometopidae (Heteroptera: Cimicoidea). NZ J. Sci. 14:940-944. . 1972. Supplement to list of Isometopidae (Heteroptera: Cimicoidea). NZ J. Sci. 15:463— 464. | Fieber, F. X. 1860. Exegesen in Hemipteren. Wien. Entomol. Monatsschr. 4:257-272. Gibson, E. H. 1917. The family Isometopidae Fieb. as represented in North America (Heter- optera). Bull. Brooklyn Entomol. Soc. 12:73-77. Heidemann, O. 1908. Notes on Heidemannia cixiiformis Uhler and other species of Isometo- pinae (Hemiptera-Heteroptera). Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 9:126—130. Henry, T. J. 1977. Teratodia Bergroth, new synonym of Diphieps Bergroth with descriptions of two new species (Heteroptera: Miridae: Isometopinae). Fla. Entomol. 60:201-210. McAtee, W. L. and J. R. Malloch. 1922. Changes in names of American Rhynchota chiefly Emesinae. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 35:95—96. —. 1924. Some annectant bugs of the superfamily Cimicoideae (Heteroptera). Bull. Brook- lyn Entomol. Soc. 19:69-83. Reuter, O. M. 1912. Hemipterologische Miscellen. Ofv. F. Vet. Soc. Férh. 54A: 76 pp. Ward, C. R., C. W. O’Brien, L. B. O’Brien, D. E. Foster and E. W. Huddleston. 1977. An annotated checklist of New World insects associated with Prosopis (mesquite). U.S. Dept. Agric. Tech. Bull. No. 1557. Wheeler, A. G., Jr. and T. J. Henry. 1978. Isometopinae (Hemiptera: Miridae) in Pennsylvania: Biology and descriptions of the fifth instars, with observations of predation on obscure scale. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 71(4):607-614. PROC. ENTOMOL. SOC. WASH. 81(1), 1979, pp. 97-100 ISCHYROPTERON BIGOT REVISITED (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE) RICHARD H. FOOTE , Systematic Entomology Laboratory, IIBIII, Agric. Res., Sci. and Educ. | Admin., USDA, % U.S. National Museum, Washington, D.C. 20560. Abstract.—The headless female holotype of Ischyropteron nigricaudatum Bigot from near Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, is described in detail; and specula- tions are made on its generic and supergeneric relationships. It is believed to belong to the trypetine tribe Adramiini, which has never been heretofore reported from the New World. In 1889, J. M. F. Bigot described Ischyropteron nigricaudatum from a single female specimen collected in Teresopolis, a suburb of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (Bigot, 1889a). Apparently believing that his name was preoccupied by Ischyroptera Pokorny 1887, he unnecessarily proposed Calopteromyia for this monotypic genus later the same year (Bigot, 1889b). The name Ischyropterum of authors is either an error or an unjustified emendation. This unusual fly is redescribed here because its relationship with other genera is obscure (see Discussion below). It is hoped that additional spec- imens may be found, thus making available other characteristics that will relate the species properly to others, either in the Neotropical Region or elsewhere. Ischyropteron nigricaudatum Bigot Description.—Female. Head entirely missing, but Bigot describes it as follows (1889a: xxix): ‘‘Antennis basi vicinus, segulo tertio oblongo, angus- to, apice rotundato, usque ad orem fere elongato, chaeto nudo; fronte con- ica, prominula, superne macrochaetis, parce sed longe, instructa, facie ob- liqua et, genis, nudis; haustello modice exserto, labris haud perspicuis; palpis elongatus, apice parum dilatatis . . . antennis sordide fulvis, basi par- um infuscatus; palpis haustelloque pallide fulvis; fronte, utrinque, superne, fusco-diffuse uni-notata, et, facie, fulvo pictis, genis, infra oculos, fusca -nigro ini-maculatis ... .”’ Thorax uniformly yellowish brown, scutum ornamented with dark brown markings as follows: Paired fasciae extending from anterior margin to level of anterior supra-alars, narrowing in region of transverse suture, then wid- ening posterior to suture before terminating, these fasciae separated by a distance equal to the width of one fascia; paired eggshaped spots laterad of 98 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON median fasciae, situated between a transverse line through humerals and a point immediately anteriad of transverse suture and separated from median fascia by 2 the width of spot; a 3rd pair of elongate, rounded spots between a point immediately posteriad of transverse suture and one slightly posteriad of dorsocentrals, and a 4th pair of smaller black spots immediately behind wing bases. Scutellum concolorous with thorax, posterior 4% of postnotum darkened. Scapulars not evident; 1 pair humerals, 2 pairs notopleurals, | pair anterior supra-alars, | pair postalars, | pair intra-alars, | pair acrosti- chals, 2 pairs anepisternals, the lower pair about % as long as the upper, 1 pair anepimerals, all the foregoing bristles black, shining. Two pairs long shining black scutellars approximately equal in length; scutum and scutellum beset with slender, sharply pointed, black setulae about 0.1 as long as presutural bristle. Pleurae almost entirely devoid of setulae except in a small triangular area immediately below notopleurals and the 6-8 notopleural set- ulae, which are shorter, colorless. Wing (Fig. 1) Length-to-width ratio 2.6:1, appearing longer and wider than usual in the family, the clear membranes with a yellowish cast and the veins in unpatterned areas of disk distinctly brown, 2nd costal cell about 5.6 as long as its greatest width, subcostal cell dark, at least 3x as long as wide, wedge shaped, vein R1 rather straight, - no prominent bristles present at subcostal break, vein r-m situated basad of middle of discal cell and pointing to about the middle of subcostal cell, veins r-m and dm-cu almost parallel, base of distal extension of basal cubital cell about 2 as wide as the cell itself, the extension triangular; little longer than its own width; anal lobe rather prominent; pattern comprising an evenly brown area in apical 4 of wing distad of vein dm-cu, its inner transverse margin parallel with that vein, vein RS haired to level of vein dm-cu above, bare below. Legs Unusually long and slender, fore coxa about % as long as fore femur, fore femur with a few short dorsal setulae instead of a ‘*comb,”’ a single dark seta posteroventrally on distal 4, fore tibia without outstanding setae; mid femur without outstanding setae, apical ’% of mid tibia slightly enlarged, a short black posterior bristle at middle, 2 long, stout apical bristles; apical 4 of hind femur with one or a pair of black apical bristles and a single black dorsolateral bristle immediately proximad; hind tibia with a small dark anterior bristle immediately beyond middle; tarso- meres 3-5 on all legs dark brown, tarsomere 2 and at least apical “4 of tarsomere | on middle and hind legs also dark brown. Abdomen Terga and sterna light brown, each slightly darkened on basal 74, abdominal terga | and 2 apparently fused, together almost as long as remaining terga, tergum 6 about 2 as long as tergum 5, setulae about as long and numerous as on scutum but light yellowish brown or colorless; ovipositor sheath (Fig. 2) % as long as abdomen, with configuration as shown in the figure, flattened condition possibly due to drying, ovipositor not visible through integument of sheath. VOLUME 81, NUMBER 1 99 Figs. 1-2. Ischyropteron nigricaudatum, female. 1, Right wing, dorsal view. 2, Ovipositor sheath, dorsal view. Discussion.—Among the Neotropical Tephritidae, /. nigricaudatum has no close morphological relationships. Its long, broad wings and long, very slender legs are not at all characteristic of other New World fruit flies; and, together with the head characters stated by Bigot, in fact relate it more closely with the Richardiidae than with any other group of flies outside the family. However, G. C. Steyskal (personal communication) states that it is definitely not a richardiid, due principally to the sharply upturned subcostal vein. Morphologically, Ischyropteron somewhat resembles some species of Euphranta; but the wing pattern is quite different, the subcostal cell is much longer and narrower, and vein r-m is situated proximad of the middle of the discal cell. In correspondence, D. E. Hardy has suggested that /schyrop- teron may relate to several genera of Xyphosiini, but most members of that tribe as defined by Hering (1947) have essentially dark wings with yellow or white spots and/or stripes and have quite a different habitus. 100 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON Ischyropteron rather closely fits the concept of the tribe Adramiini as discussed by Hardy (1974) in that the body bristles are rather delicate; dorsocentrals, presuturals and katepisternals are not present; the abdomen is long, comparatively narrow and straight sided; and the wing is excep- tionally long in comparison to body length. Generically, however, the genus appears to be distinct, differing by at least one character from each of the 8 Oriental adramiine genera discussed by Hardy (1973, 1974) and from each of the 5 known Afrotropical genera. It is hoped that specimens with heads become available for study. If so, the supergeneric relationships of Jschyropteron can be made clear. If in fact this genus is eventually shown to be an adramiine as discussed above, the presence of this tribe in the New World will be recorded for the first time. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I hereby express my gratitude to J. W. Ismay, Hope Department of Zo- ology (Entomology), University of Oxford, for making the holotype (and only specimen) of nigricaudatum available for study. My gratitude is also hereby expressed to D. E. Hardy and G. C. Steyskal, who discussed with me the possible relationships of this species. Ms. Ellen Paige executed the figures. LITERATURE CITED Bigot, J. M. F. 1889a. Novum genus Dipterorum ex Trypetidis, genus Chaetostomae (Ron- dani) sat vicinum. Bull. Soc. Entomol. Fr. (1889):xxix—xxx. . 1889b. [Change of generic name.] Ann. Soc. Entomol. Fr. (6) 9 (Bull.):xciil. Hardy, D. E. 1973. The fruit flies of the Phillipines (Diptera: Tephritidae). Pacif. Ins. Monogr. 32: 1-266. . 1974. The fruit flies (Tephritidae-Diptera) of Thailand and bordering countries. Pacif. Ins. Monogr. 31:1—353. Hering, E. M. 1947. Bestimmungstabelle der Unterfamilien und Tribus der Trypetidae. Siruna Seva. 6:1-16. PROC. ENTOMOL. SOC. WASH. 81(1), 1979, pp. 101-104 LABOULBENIA FORMICARUM THAXTER (ASCOMYCOTINA: LABOULBENIALES) ON ANTS (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE) IN RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA WITH A NEW HOST RECORD' T. P. NUHN AND C. G. VAN DYKE Departments of Entomology and Botany, North Carolina State Univer- sity, Raleigh, North Carolina 27650. Abstract.—A survey of ant species on the campus of North Carolina State University was conducted during 1971-73. Several species collected were found to be infested with the Ascomycete fungus Laboulbenia formicarum Thaxter. Ants were studied with light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). One of the species, Acanthomyops murphyi (Forel), represents a new host record for the fungus-ant relationship and SEM mi- crographs are presented. The fungus Laboulbenia formicarum Thaxter is an ectoparasite of ants in the subfamily Formicinae. Smith (1961) reported that 17 species in five genera have been recorded as hosts. There have been no observed detri- mental effects on infected ants which were attributable to the fungus. La- boulbenia formicarum was the first species in the genus proven dioecious (Benjamin and Shanor, 1950a). They detailed its development from asco- spore germination to mature individuals (Benjamin and Shanor, 1950b). In Raleigh, North Carolina, the fungus was first collected by Z. P. Metcalf on all castes of (Lasius alienus Foerster) (=Lasius niger var. americanus Emery) (Smith, 1928). Recently, the fungus was again encountered in Ra- leigh during a survey of the various ant species on the campus of North Carolina State University (Nuhn, 1977). Two species of ants were photographed by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), one of which represents a new host record of the fungus-ant rela- tionship. MATERIALS AND METHODS Over 500 collections of ants were made on or adjacent to the campus of North Carolina State University, Raleigh, primarily from September 1971 ' Paper No. 5691 of the Journal Series of the North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station, Raleigh, North Carolina. The use of trade names in this publication does not imply endorsement by the North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station of the products named nor criticism of similar ones not mentioned. 102 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON | Fig. 1. The abdomen of a specimen of Acanthomyops murphyi as seen with SEM. The arrows point to a few of the individual fungal structures of Laboulbenia formicarum. (90x) Fig. 2. A close-up view of Laboulbenia formicarum on the body of Acanthomyops murphyi. The female (2) portion of the fungus is to the left and the male (d) portion to the right. Another fungal individual in the early developmental stage is behind this pair. The ascus (A) of the fungus is associated with the female portion. (1,000) VOLUME 81, NUMBER | 103 through August 1973, during a study of the species composition of ants in landscaped suburban habitats. Most of the ants were collected with an as- pirator and placed in 70% ethyl alcohol; others were obtained with pitfall traps. Specimens of Acanthomyops murphyi (Forel) stored in 70% ETOH were subsequently dehydrated in ethanol and a graded ethanol-Freon series and critical-point dried in Freon 13. The dried specimens were mounted on stubs, coated with gold, and observed and photographed using an ETEC Autoscan microscope. RESULTS The fungus Laboulbenia formicarum was found on the exoskeleton of four species of ants, representing four different genera. The percent of col- lections with infested ants for each species was as follows: Lasius neoniger Emery 44% (38 of 86 collections); Formica pallidefulva Latreille 544% (1 of 19 collections); Prenolepis imparis (Say) 242% (1 of 40 collections); and Acanthomyops murphyi (Forel) 20% (1 of 5 collections). The collection of Acanthomyops murphyi represents a new genus and species host record for L. formicarum. Figure | shows the fungus-ant relationship as seen with SEM; the abdo- men has numerous fungal individuals, as did other ant parts. Figure 2 shows the morphology and dioecous nature of the fungus. The fungal structures are somewhat collapsed, which perhaps occurred while the ants were in 70% alcohol for several years. These represent the first published SEM micrographs of L. formicarum. DISCUSSION Species of Acanthomyops have long been considered as potentially ac- ceptable hosts for Laboulbenia formicarum (Smith, 1946). Species of Acan- thomyops were suspected of being temporary social parasites of the closely related genus Lasius, acommon host of L. formicarum (Wing, 1968). Such a situation would facilitate transfer of the fungus from one host species to another. For example, the fungus has been found on various species in the genus Formica and on certain social parasites of Formica in the genera Formica and Polyergus (Smith, 1946). Of 41 collections of ants infested with Laboulbenia formicarum, 38 (93%) were from Lasius neoniger. Also, the incidence of fungus within each species was over twice as high for L. neoniger as for any other species. This suggests that the fungus may prefer L. neoniger over the other ac- ceptable hosts. It would be interesting to establish whether the fungus shows a preference for specific ant species and whether the relative prominence of Lasius neoniger in Raleigh affects the infestation rates between different species. 104 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON ACKNOWLEDGMENT We gratefully acknowledge confirmation of the fungus identification by Dr. R. K. Benjamin. LITERATURE CITED Benjamin, R. K. and L. Shanor. 1950a. Discovery of dioecism in Laboulbenia formicarum. Science. 111:33-34. —. 1950b. The development of male and female individuals in the dioecious species — Laboulbenia formicarum Thaxter. Am. J. Bot. 37:471-476. Nuhn, T. P. 1977. A survey of the ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on the campus of North Carolina State University at Raleigh. M.S. Thesis. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, N. C. Smith, M. R. 1928. Remarks concerning the distribution and hosts of the parasitic ant fungus, Laboulbenia formicarium (sic) Thaxter. Bull. Brooklyn Entomol. Soc. 23:104—106. . 1946. Ant hosts of the fungus, Laboulbenia formicarum Thaxter. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 48:29-31. . 1961. Another ant genus host of the parasitic fungus Laboulbenia Robin. Proc. Ento- mol. Soc. Wash. 63:58. Wing, M. W. 1968. Taxonomic revision of the Nearctic genus Acanthomyops (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). NY Agric. Exp. Stn. (Ithaca), Mem. 405:1-173. PROC. ENTOMOL. SOC. WASH. 81(1), 1979, pp. 105-107 RECOGNITION CHARACTERS AND DISTRIBUTION RECORDS FOR SPECIES OF CONOTRACHELUS (COLEOPTERA: CURCULIONIDAE) THAT DAMAGE AVOCADO FRUITS IN MEXICO AND CENTRAL AMERICA DONALD R. WHITEHEAD Systematic Entomology Laboratory, IBIII, Agric. Res., Sci. and Educ. Admin., USDA, % U.S. National Museum, Washington, D.C. 20560. Abstract.—Three species of Conotrachelus are known or suspected pests of commercially grown avocado fruits in Mexico and Central America: C. aguacatae Barber, C. perseae Barber and C. serpentinus (Klug). These species form part of a poorly known species group. Diagnoses and keys are given for their recognition, and distribution records are summarized. In recent years, some concern has arisen about importation of avocado fruits into the United States, and field surveys have been made in Mexico to locate possible pest-free areas. Three species of Conotrachelus Schoen- herr appear to damage commercially grown avocado fruits in Central Amer- ica, and at least two are of economic importance (Garcia Arellano, 1975). When Barber (1919, 1923) published his comments on these species, their geographic distributions seemed to be allopatric. However, all three are now known to occur in central Mexico. Therefore, diagnostic characters are given for their recognition, and distribution records are summarized. Specimens of at least a dozen other Conotrachelus species, most as yet undetermined, have been submitted as a result of these surveys. However, these species are not closely related to the pest species discussed here, and I have no information to implicate them as avocado pests. I thank Mike Shannon (APHIS, USDA) for pertinent information, and I thank Wayne Clark (Auburn University), and F. C. Thompson and R. W. Hodges (Systematic Entomology Laboratory), for constructive criticism. RECOGNITION CHARACTERS Adults of the avocado pests trace to ‘‘group r’”’ in Champion’s (1904) key to Central American Conotrachelus. Members of this group are distin- guished from other Conotrachelus by the following diagnosis: Mesosternum and anterior part of metasternum depressed along midline but not forming part of rostral canal, mesosternum not conspicuously binodose; elytra with alternate intervals costate, costae of intervals 3&5 evanescent in anterior 3 or 4%, costae of intervals 7&9 entire; femora clavate, unidentate ventrally. 106 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON Group r’ includes C. conicicollis Champion 1904, C. incanus Champion 1904, C. octocostatus Champion 1925, C. sulcipectus Champion 1904, sev- eral apparently undescribed forms, and the avocado pests discussed here. This paper is intended only to facilitate recognition of the avocado pests, as I have seen insufficient material of the other species to justify a revision of this poorly known complex. The three pest species are distinguished from other members of the group by the following diagnosis: Elytra narrow (width/length = 0.64—-0.72), widest at humeri, strongly converging posteriad toward apex; pronotal punctures coarse, nearly uniform, interstices lacking smaller punctures; elytral vestiture coarse, long, largely fulvous or brownish (not uniformly pale); strial punctures each with slender, elongate, white scale; beak not more than 1.5 (male) or 1.8 (female) times longer than prono- tum; front coxae clearly separated, front and middle coxae with vestiture recumbent. See Barber (1923) for illustrations of male genitalia. KEY TO THE AVOCADO-EATING SPECIES OF CONOTRACHELUS 1. Abdominal sterna 3&4 coarsely punctate; pronotum strongly trans- verse (length/width less than 0.80), strongly constricted in front, con- ical; beak with antennal insertion near apical 0.30—0.35 in male, near apical 0.40-0.45 in female; front coxae narrowly separated. Florida, West Indies, Mexico, Central America, South America........... HAL SS. BO ERE A ee Ooh Bah vee ie motte? 4 serpentinus (Klug) — Adbominal sterna 3&4 finely punctate: pronotum less transverse (length/width more than 0.80), strongly constricted in front or not, conical or subconical; beak with antennal insertion at or beyond apical 0.25 in male, at or beyond apical 0.40 in female: front coxae widely:separated.*Mexico; Central America i225 -1:). sie s <)- 2 Beak with antennal insertion near apical 0.18—0.20 in male, near apical 0.25 in female; uncus of male front tibia simple, acute; uncus of male hind tibia short, dentate; pronotum feebly constricted in fromtstconicalseMiexicom. taexk aatat. Seca eases aguacatae Barber — Beak with antennal insertion near apical 0.25 in male, near apical 0.35-0.40 in female; uncus of male front tibia dilated, truncate or bifid: uncus of male hind tibia short, blunt, recurved; pronotum i) Conotrachelus aguacatae Barber 1923. This species damages avocado in central Mexico. MEXICO: Coahuila (Ciudad Acuna, Saltillo), Jalisco (Huascata), Michoacan (Uruapan), Nayarit (Tepic), Queretaro (Queretaro). Conotrachelus perseae Barber 1923. Described as a pest of avocado in Guatemala, this species is now known to range from central Mexico (see also Garcia Arellano, 1975) southward to Costa Rica. Costa Rican speci- VOLUME 81, NUMBER 1 107 mens differ by having a more conical pronotum, male tibial uncus truncate rather than bifid, beak in both sexes relatively slender and elongate, and male phallus more broadly rounded apically—characters here regarded as geographic variation. Study of additional material may indicate that this form is a distinct species. MEXICO: Michoacan (Uruapan). GUATEMA- LA: Alta Verapaz (Coban), Guatemala (Guatemala). HONDURAS: Mora- zan (Zamorano). COSTA RICA: San Jose (San Jose, San Pedro de Montes de Oca). Conotrachelus serpentinus (Klug) 1829. [Balaninus serpentinus Klug 1829 = Conotrachelus serpentinus Germar of Boheman 1837, a secondary usage according to Kuschel (1955); C. ventralis LeConte 1878 = C. serpen- tinus, according to Barber (1919) and other authors.] Barber (1919) sug- gested that distribution records cited by Champion (1904) might have been based on misidentifications, but Champion’s description of this species and the records given here suggest that his identifications and distribution rec- ords were correct. Not generally regarded as a pest of commercial avocado, this species attacks various native species of Persea (Barber, 1919); how- ever, the Queretaro specimen cited below was taken from avocado along with specimens of C. aguacatae. Therefore, this species is here regarded as at least a potential avocado pest. In addition to the records cited from Mexico, I have seen specimens from Florida, the Bahamas, Cuba, and Haiti; see Champion (1904) for additional distribution records. MEXICO: Quere- taro (Queretaro), Veracruz (Tampico), Yucatan (Yaxcopoil). There probably are many additional Persea-eating Conotrachelus species belonging to this complex. I have seen three apparently undescribed ones from Central America that closely resemble C. perseae. One female (Tur- rialba, Costa Rica) differs by having a very long beak, about 2.0 times longer than the pronotum and extended nearly to the apex of ventrite 1. Two females (San Jose, Costa Rica) have the front coxae nearly contiguous, the front and middle coxae with tufted, suberect vestiture. Two males (Barro Colorado Island, Panama, and Hermitage Res., Jamaica) have the front coxae narrowly separated, front and middle mucrones normal, and the hind tibial mucrone greatly enlarged. LITERATURE CITED Barber, H. S. 1919. Avocado seed weevils. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 21:53-60. . 1923. Two new Conotrachelus from tropical fruits (Coleoptera, Curculionidae). Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 25:182-185. Champion, G. C. 1904. Rhynchophora, Curculionidae. Vol. 4, part 4, pp. 337-448. In God- man, F. D. and O. Salvin. Biologia Centrali-Americana. Garcia Arellano, P. 1975. Clave para la identificacion de las larvas barrenadoras del hueso del aguacate en Mexico. Folia Entomol. Mex. 31—32:127—131. Kuschel, G. 1955. Nuevas sinonimias y anotaciones sobre Curculionoidea (Coleoptera). Rev. Chilena Entomol. 4:261-312. PROC. ENTOMOL. SOC. WASH. 81(1), 1979, pp. 108-110 PYGMEPHORUS ATHIASAE WICHT: A REDESCRIPTION OF THE HOLOTYPE (ACARI: PYEMOTIDAE) ROBERT L. SMILEY Systematic Entomology Laboratory, IIBIII, Agric. Res., Sci. and Educ. Admin., USDA, Beltsville, Maryland 20705. Abstract.—Pygmephorus athiasae Wicht, 1970 is redescribed; and illus- trations are given for the dorsal and ventral surfaces of the body and legs I-IV of the female. I examined the holotype of a mushroom mite, Pygmephorus athiasae Wicht while studying Pygmephorus species of the Western Hemisphere. Wicht’s (1970) description and illustrations do not provide enough details of the morphological characteristics to allow for recognition of the species. Because of the economic importance of Pygmephorus mites to the mush- room industry (Hussey et al., 1969) and because females of several pyg- mephorids are dimorphic (Rack, 1974; Cross and Moser, 1975; Moser and Cross, 1975; Kosir, 1975: Smiley and Moser, 1976), it is essential to illustrate and describe all species so that accurate determinations can be provided. The higher classification of the Pyemotoidea and Pygmephoroidea (Mahun- ka, 1970) requires further study because of the confusion caused by the occurrence of dimorphic females and because some taxa overlap. Accurate descriptions and illustrations are needed to design a workable classification. Pygmephorus athiasae Wicht Figs. 1-5 Pygmephorus athiasae Wicht, 1970:266. Holotype Female.—USNM, collected at Citeaux, France, date unknown, by Madame C. Athias; no other data available. Female.—Gnathosoma oval, wider than long, dorsoventrally with 2 pairs of simple setae. Dorsum: Propodosomal shield subrectangular, longer than wide, lightly punctate; with 3 pairs of conspicuous spiculate setae, anterior and medial pairs subequal, posterior pair longest, more than 2x as long as others. Pseudostigmatic organ globelike, without spicules. Hysterosoma lightly punctate with conspicuous spiculate setae; Ist (anterior) tergite larg- est, with lateral and medial pair of spiculate setae; 2nd tergite with pair of medial spiculate setae; longer than medial setae of Ist tergite; 3rd tergite with medial and lateral pairs of spiculate setae, lateral pair about 2 length VOLUME 81, NUMBER I 109 Figs. 1-5. Pygmephorus athiasae, female. 1, Dorsal and ventral view. 2, Right leg I. 3, Right leg II. 4, Right leg III. 5, Right leg IV. of medial pair; 4th tergite with lateral setae short and simple, medial setae subequal in length to medial setae of 3rd tergite. Venter: Posteromedial plate between legs IV wider than long, spade shaped distally, with pair of simple setae. Coxal setal formula: 3—2—3-—2. Leg I robust, with strong, distally recurved claw. Setation on femur, genu, and tibiotarsus I: 3+1 rod- like seta —4—12+4 eupathidia +4 solenidia; leg II with bifurcate claws, setation on femur, genu, tibia and tarsus: 3—3—4+1 small solenidion —6+ 1 solenidion; leg HI with bifurcate claws, setation on femur, genu, tibia, and tarsus: 2—2—4+1 small solenidion —5; leg IV with uncinate claws and not enlarged, setation on femur, genu, tibia, and tarsus: 2—1—4+1 small so- 110 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON lenidion —6. Posterior plate with 3 pairs of terminal setae. Body 326 pu long, 147 w wide. Male.—Unknown. Distribution.—This species is known only from the type-locality. Ac- cording to Wicht (1970) it is found in various places in mushroom houses and actually on mushrooms. LITERATURE CITED Cross, E. A. and J. C. Moser. 1975. A new dimorphic species of Pyemotes and a key to previously described forms (Acarina: Tarsonemoidea). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 68:723- S52 Hussey, N. W., W. H. Read and J. J. Hesling. 1969. The pests of protected cultivation. The biology and control of glasshouse and mushroom pests. American Elsevier Publishing Co., Inc. New York. 404 pp. Kosir, M. 1975. Ernahrund und Entwicklung von Pygmephorus mesembrinae und P. quad- ratus (Pygmephoridae, Tarsonemini, Acari) und Bemerkungen Uber drei weitere arten. Pedobiologia, Bd. 15:313—329. Mahunka, S. 1970. Considerations on the systematics of the Tarsonemina and the description of new European taxa (Acari: Trombidiformes). Acta. Zool. Acad. Sci. Hung. 16:137- 174. Moser, J. C. and E. A. Cross. 1975. Phoretomorph: a new phoretic phase unique to the Pyemotidae (Acarina: Tarsonemoidea). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 68:820-822. Rack, G. 1974. Neue und bekannte Milbenarten der Uberfamilie Pygmephoroidea aus dem Saalkreis bei Halle (Acarina, Tarsonemida). Entomol. Mitt. Zool. Mus. Hamb. 4:499- Syile Smiley, R. L. and J. C. Moser. 1976. Two new phoretomorphic Siteroptes (Acarina: Pye- motidae) from galleries of the southern pine beetle. Beitr. Entomol. 26(1):307-322. Wicht, M. C., Jr. 1970. Three new species of pyemotid mites associated with commercial mushrooms. Acarologia. 12:262—268. PROC. ENTOMOL. SOC. WASH. 81(1), 1979, pp. 111-124 SPHECID WASPS OF THE WORLD: ERRORS AND OMISSIONS (HYMENOPTERA: SPHECIDAE) A. S. MENKE AND R. M. BOHART (ASM) Systematic Entomology Laboratory, IIBIII, Agric. Res., Sci. and Educ. Admin., USDA, % U.S. National Museum, Washington, D.C. 20560; (RMB) Department of Entomology, University of California, Davis, Cali- fornia 95616. Abstract.—Errors of omission and commission in the book ‘‘Sphecid Wasps of the World”’ (1976) by Bohart and Menke are corrected. Since our book “‘Sphecid Wasps of the World’? was published in 1976, various mistakes and omissions have been found. Fortunately, most of these are minor spelling errors, incorrect dates or improper gender endings on species names. The serious errors include overlooked species names, in- correct tribal spellings, wrong gender determinations for a few genera, mis- takes in key couplets and omissions of several lines of text. With the real- ization that we dealt with over 14,000 names the errors are few, but they are regretted nonetheless, especially because so many people painstakingly proofed galley copy. We would appreciate being informed of any additional mistakes or omissions, especially any names published before 1976 that were not included in the book. Hopefully, all errata can be inserted in future editions. We would like to thank the various people that have brought some of these items to our attention, but we want to thank especially George Steys- kal, Systematic Entomology Laboratory, USDA, SEA, AR, Washington, D.C. and H. D. Cameron, Dept. of Classical Studies, University of Michi- gan, for checking scientific names in the book for grammatical correctness. Some of their revelations involve changes in spelling and gender which upset traditional usage. Abbreviations used below are: RC = right column, LC = left column, MC = middle column, L = line. The page number is given first in each citation. Repetitive changes are listed in groups to save space. TRIBAL NAMES The following spellings should be adopted: Sceliphrini for Sceliphronini Prionychina for Prionyxina 112 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON Trypoxylini for Trypoxylonini Aphilanthopini & -ina for Aphilanthopsini & -ina MASS CHANGES OF DATES, ETC. Change 1896 to 1897a as follows: 28, LC, L 35; 38, LC, L 13; 40, RC, L 2): Al RCI, 12:42 REV IS 74asicbC. Tiss 44. bE. 25> 457 LC eae 51:46, LC, 46246, RC 243488 RGC, 1555552, RC, L'62; S49REC) wire 216, L@vL! 1 207 RE PE M4222 EE 1513030; 308, LC baAss 3500 re 21-352: RE, L502 607, Le; 24: Change 1896 to 1897 as follows: 42, RC, L 17, 21; 45, LC, L 33, 45, 52; 46. 1G, 1 48346; REE es: 220 Ree 26.3227 RE, E23: Change 1864 to 1863 as follows: 41, RC, L 10-11, 13; 106, RC, L 22; 164, LC, £45: 186, RC, £38:.245. RC 33:.247, RC, 129° 585, Clases Change 1838 to 1839 as follows: 43, RC, L 16-17, 20; 55, RC, L 1, 3-5; 134. RC. A244 ee 1 43-3153, We 583.245, RC. 52.756 eae 53: 267 WE wk 26; 273; REE, We 274, LE, 8; 275, RC; £19; 29 ee 16-17-7367 RE; L545 368) ECAE 4529219 LE rE 16; 526-REWeSsas2e RG; 1425545. ROV46, 49547 Cy 3s S49) CHL 215 :39; 6S 134: 5669 C21 442566; RC 39s 5 784 ROL 483580, RC, lastii am EC, eal6s 18192587 RC 42 588k Coie 83 588, RC. LS; Change 1893 to 1894 as follows: 213, LC, L 13; 244, LC, L 3, 6; 258, RC, L16,.22, 207 259, LC; © 21; 2597 RE) L42245=46; 265°LC, Lk 3327720 137 45, 5022725 REA 2=5,.92273,, ESL 375437 273) RC, 333274 E33 275 ys = 14517, 36-275 RG 375939: 276) RE. 25742 elo BAN 27 413299 VUCaE 262131 SEG 23335496. REY LS: Change 1858 to 1857 as follows: 45, RC, L 33-34, 38; 74, LC, L 4; 78, ROVE 23206) RC, e214, RE w38 72, RCs 1343: 237 RES Paes 248, EC, L 34; 264, LC,, L 6: 336, RC, L 73337, LC, L 13; 410, Lean 531, RC, last L. Change 1895 to 1896 as follows: 53, LC, L 34; 501, LC, L 41; 503, LC, 1-24.955¢4506; RE, 1.35; 508,21 C, \6:/516;- REMlast 517) ECA seu ROE 524591521 LG eEMIe. Delete ‘“‘new synonymy by R. Bohart’’ and ‘‘new status by R. Bohart”’ as follows (see Bohart and Grissell, 1975): 564, RC, L 9-10, 42-45, 47; 565, LC, L 28-29, 33-36; 565, RC, L 23, 26-28; 566, LC, L 3-4, 6-9, 19-20, 26-27, 56-59; 566, RC, L 14-15, 57-58; 567, RC, L 1-3; 576, RC, L 23-24; 577, RG; last two 3/578, RC,°L'1631579, "LC, L427 580, RC} b. 34=355 56-57% 581, RC, L 5, 45-46; 584, RC, L 33, 35; 586, RC, L 23-24; 588, RC, L 57; 591, RE 29-30: 592. WE le 5=729: 592 RE) ES: | KOHL ‘‘ 1896” F. Kohl’s *‘Die Gattungen der Sphegiden’’ which has always been cited as published in 1896 actually appeared in early 1897, probably in March.The major effect of this discovery is that the citation of Nitelopterus Ashmead VOLUME 81, NUMBER 1 113 must be changed as follows: 45, LC, L 31 should read: (Nitelopterus) Ash- mead, 1897:22. Delete L 34-37. FABRICIUS °*1781”’ Fabricius’ ‘Species Insectorum’”’ bears the date 1781 on the title page, however, the work was published in 1782 according to the author in his autobiography (see Hope, 1847). The only consequence of this for our book is that 1781 should be changed to 1782 (species names on pp. 77, 103, 105, 106, 115, 139, 291, 401, 427, 526 & 566). ERRATA SHEET L 35: Oryttus is correct (p. 485) L 50: delete entire entry (p. 655) L 52: jamaicensis is correct (p. 661) FIGURE 15 Letters used in legend were not placed on the figures. They apply left to right, top to bottom. LET (page number is first entry) a IC. 1 20: New Zealand not Nigerian SAG CAG Big montana 1s correct 5) BGR Wes 945 Deinomimesa is correct Po iC. 1,45: 1894e is correct aA. RC, L 32: add parenthesis after Psammaletes os RC. L. 15: 7,633 is correct RE. 117: 84 is correct RG. L 30: Tachytes—265 is correct 83, Table 3: change figures as indicated below: Larrinae 2,070 Bembix—328 Philanthinae 1,097 + (2) Cerceris—857 + (1) Pemphredoninae 717 Psenulus—122 meee. 1. 8: courtesy is correct Bo, LC, L 56: delete ‘‘recte kirbyi”’ mae Le 37 14: kirbii is correct fi, RC, L 59: africanum 1s correct ms, LC, L 13: reticulatus is correct iC’ 1; 28,, 39: appendiculatus is correct Ee. 1.6): argentatus 1S correct RC, L 41: 1894a is correct aac, 1,59: 1893b is correct 114 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON 451 G. E53; 54555: these should be indented to align with lines 61-63 RC aie ss: 1893b is correct SORE Tr 33: Ceratocolus is correct SOP GH 131 ,*32: 1894a is correct 54 °RC LS 4: 1897b is correct REYES: 1897 is correct RC, L 14-15: delete ‘“‘new synonymy by Menke and Pulawski”’ (see Kazenas, 1974) 59 Ee 163: change (Astatinae) to (Astatinae and Xenosphe- cinae) RE 2: change 19 to 20 RG} ly 5-7: delete *‘, midtibia with two apical spurs in both both sexes” RC, L 10-12: delete ‘‘, females with two midtibial spurs but males with none... Dinetini, p. 251°’ and substitutes “Wi 9” RC, insert the following revised couplet after L12: 19. Forewing with three submarginal cells, episternal sulcus essentially absent, New World...... Xenosphecini, p. 439 Forewing with two submarginal cells, episternal sulcus long, reaching’ venter, Old Wonds:-...: 222-2: Dinetini, p. 215 RCW E13: change 19 to 20 RC e116: delete 20 and substitute: Laphyragogini, p. 219 RC, 18-23: delete entire couplet WOIRCSL 37: delete Westwood (for consistency) 9S REE 30: cyclocephala is correct 1OS5 te Cale 27: omissum 1s correct. The spelling ommissum dates from Kohl, 1906 (Sceliphron). Out of al- phabetical order, place after L 36 1055 LE) le 38: jJamaicense Fabricius is the proper name for the species listed by us as annulatum (L 36) [see Art. 59 (b) (ii)] 106, LC, insert after L 54: bruininii (W. F. Kirby), 1880 (Zoo. Rec.) (Pelo- paeus), emendation. Insert in index 109, Fig. 25E: kirbii is correct 114, LC, L 29: plumifer is correct REE 54: argentifer is correct 1116; 1G: 1-24: melanopus is correct. Add ‘‘nec Dahlbom, 1843°° to end of line RE S13 47: integer, not integrus ies 3: erythropus 1s correct 128-132: change the species name kirbyi to kirbii VOLUME 81, NUMBER I 115 #30, LC, L 45: hindtibial is correct 3, LC, L 34: erythrogastra is correct IE ac .53: indus is correct eee S4: indostanus is correct EC. 1 58: englebegi. . . . 1898 is correct Rew 2: kirbii is correct RC, insert after L 6: kirbyi Dours, 1874 (Parasphex), emendation RCA 14: delete parenthesis in front of Berland RG: L 36: melas is correct 4, LC, L 13: albospinifer is correct m9, RC, L 47: erythrocephala is correct 145, RC, L 49, 56: luteus 1S correct M6, LC, RC: Eremochares is a masculine noun (Art. 30a(i)(2). Change species names ending in -a to -us fe RE. LL 22: lobicollis out of chronological sequence, place after velutina 53, LC, L 48: Snoflak is correct REA 12; Geoffroy in Fourcroy, 1785 is correct RCM 53: Frivaldszky, 1877 is correct. Change in index also RE. 1,54: delete entire line RC, insert after L S6: mocsarti W. F. Kirby, 1880 (Zoo. Rec.), emen- dation. Insert in index ips, RE, Ll 29: 718 is correct mo, eC. L 7,11: Psenini and Pemphredonini should not be in italics RE 23: 334 is correct mo. WC, 22: delete” except Ss. America BC. 55: Odontopsen is correct Rew 13; Mimumesa Malloch is correct fos, RC, I 37: pacifica 1s correct 164, LC, L 43: reticulata is correct los ILC, I 52: chrysomalla is correct REE 20: 79 is correct 166, LC, L 4: van Lith, 1959 is correct GSE 5: erythopus is correct CE. 8: One species, barthi, ..... is correct. Membraci- dae should not be in italics RC Ie. 9: erythopus is correct REA TE 10: erythropus 1s correct RC Ie 35: matalensis is correct RC, insert after L 26: ssp. formosensis Tsuneki, 1965; Taiwan tov, LC, L 26-27: mandibularis is proper subspecies name; tsu- nekii is valid only if Mimumesa is considered 116 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON 7 RS 1, 5520: RC 128: 1722 Ce, 1 34: LC, insert after L 48: RG Mave RC. 122: RC. 133: 173 Ue, 120: MELA LG, insert after L 39: ee E50; RC, -L.. 4: REC 1c, iG: RE. 1550: 178 eC, 2S: 179: eG. rag: RE. Bie 180-182: ISD PRE, We 49-10: S82 le Ce 36: LC, L 44: LC, L 48: RC.) 20: 184. 1c€, 10:33: RE de83: RC, insert after L 29: 18S65RC pS: 191, LC, L 16: ECA T4t: 193 RECS 13 47: RC, L 44: 194. Ge CAL 2931436: ECG 435-36, 51: 195, Fig. 47A: to be congeneric with Psen (see Art. 59c). Delete ‘‘nec H. Smith, 1906” | 122 is correct Neotropical—2 is correct chrysidid is correct aztecus Bohart and Grissell, 1969; Mexico brevitarsis is correct bismarckensis is correct corporaali is correct salomonensis 1s correct jalapensis is a nomen nudum. It is a lapsus for mayorum. (see below) mayorum Bohart and Grissell, 1969; Mexico delete *‘Sri Lanka’”’ Java is correct tristis 1S correct sandakanensis is correct leguminifer is correct leguminifer Cockerell in Cockerell and Fox, 1897 is correct spinifer is correct Pemphredon is a feminine Greek noun. Change species names ending in -ws to -a here and in index delete ‘“‘new synonymy by Bohart’’ (see Lom- holdt, 1975) put parens around Dahlbom. Insert ‘‘(Cemo- nus) after 1844 sedula is out of alphabetical order, place after L 45 tenera 1s correct 22 is correct Cockerell in Cockerell and Fox, 1897 is correct longiceps is correct turanicus Gussakovskij, 1952; sw. USSR deserticola is correct (Turner), 1917 (Stigmus) is correct saigusai is correct exspectata is correct minutissima is correct ceanothae is correct africanum is correct. Gender of Xysma is neuter ceanothae is correct VOLUME 81, NUMBER | 208; RC, L 24: 12, LC, L 45: RC. 55: ms, ILC. L. 16: ewe 17: 229, RC, footnote 5: 234, Fig. 63G: 236, Fig. 64B, Q: Fig. 64C: Fig. 64E: Fig. 64K: Fig. 640: 238-248: Base We: 17: 249, Fig. 67A: 250; RC, lL 3: 253, Fig. 69F: 258, Fig. 71C: RE-r; 12: 259-260: 260, RC, L 27: Po. EC. I. 2: 263, RC, L 9: RC: 117 peculiar is correct Cockerell in Cockerell and Fox, 1897 (Astatus) is correct mexicana is out of alphabetical order, place ahead of miegii aspera W. Fox, 1894 (Astatus) is correct delete entire entry tenebrosus 1s correct argentatus is correct odontophorus is correct argentatus is correct ciliatus is correct subtessellatus is correct aurulentus is correct Liris is masculine (Art. 30a(i)(1), the river Garigliano) and all species names ending in -a should be changed to -ws (except montezuma, antaka, ancara, antaca, argenticauda, flavi- vena, basilissa, cleopatra, erythropyga, eryth- rotoma, fuscistigma, gryllicida, melania, na- mana, argyropyga, palumbula, pitamawa, primania, regina, sabrina, samoa, hova, seri- cosoma, silvicola, & muspa); erythropoda should be erythropus; nigra should be niger; and the suffix -a should be dropped from dyscheira, dasycheira, gastrifera, setigera, ru- gifera and spathulifera. Make same changes in index and addendum Turner (1916b, d) is correct argentatus is correct facetus is correct. Paraliris is masculine distinctum is correct punctulatum is correct (Cockerell) in Cockerell and Fox, 1897 (Ancis- tromma) Is correct Ancistromma is neuter. Change species names ending in -a to -uwm (except aurantia and socia). Change /aevidorsis to laevidorse. Make same changes in index 265 is correct 24 Neotropical is correct alacer 1s correct delete L 36-37 (antillarum and apiformis ) 118 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON RC, L 46: 264, RC, L 47: 265, EC: GC. dlast i; 266, RC, L 56: 2671, le @uplege3: [ees 128: EC: 135: 271, Fig. 74A: 272, RC, insert after L 53: 273) lea Ie ile I INAS. |RSS 279, Fig. 76 G: 297, Fig. 84J: 299° REE 46: 201k 24: 306518 C-L23: 313, RE E46: 323, ECE: 332 shC ii 16: 335 RECA 5: 346, LC, L 36: EGle3i: LE@.1,55: Geils 58: 347. Cs Si: 348, 1G; 8: EG 40: RE. 53: 349% 13Gy 1s 4: 350, BEV E20: 355; RCo ansert after lv 22: 3635 LCy i 22: 366; RC; 53: 3675 RC, 3: 368; RG) Ee 14: RE wk AT: 374, LCC E55: melanopyga is correct N. & C. America is correct delete L 17 (fervens) harpax should not be indented setiger 1S correct tabrobanae is correct turcomanicus is correct testaceinervus is correct distinctum is correct brullei Kirchner, 1867 (Tachytes), emendation 1914 is correct Frivaldszky, 1877 is correct. Change in index Tachytes fucatus is correct soikai is correct e. N. America is correct frontalis is correct 1899 is correct delete ‘“‘new synonymy by Menke’ (see Sielfeld, 1975) 1894e is correct 1968a is correct argentatum is out of alphabetical order, place ahead of ashmeadi gardineri 1s correct 1901 is correct majus 1S correct minus 1s correct 1901 is correct sinuosiscute 18 correct Gussakovskij is correct Johannis is out of alphabetical order, place ahead of lactitarse place dagger (+) at beginning of line. Add ‘‘nec Kohl, 1883” after Brasil, 1894e is correct carina paralleling outer orbit from mandible base to upper angle of eye; occipital carina meeting hypostomal trilineata is correct frondiger is correct conifer 1S correct linguifer is correct spinifer is correct hindtibia is correct ~VOLUME 81, NUMBER 1 4 feo. LC, L 35: 1693; LC, L 33: #200, RC, L 15: 401, 402, 414, 420, 427, 428, 430, 448, 449, 457, 458, 469, 470, 492, 495, 496, 500, 501, RC. 32: RC, L 24: BC AL. 13: Ee last le: SialkeG. al. 25: LC, 1,29: LG, L 56: REE At: RE: I 39: RC; iL 46; IE, 129: RC. iL 35=36: RC wL26: WE. te 32: | Cay Ge RC, L.42: RG. i 12: LE; 1.40: IEG, lL 43,, 45: REs hel7: REE 24: LC, L 49: RC, L.39: RG, 1:55: EC. AL, 41: LC, L 46: LG, L 48: RE. b 42; RE. 14: RG. 24: RG. £47: EC, ansert after 130: LC, L 44: RET. W7: RG, i 30: REwhk 50; 119 tibiale is correct. Change in index imbellis is correct bougainvilleae is correct yezo is correct nipponis is correct maculipennis (F. Smith), 1856 (Crabro); is cor- rect unicus is the proper name for ne/li. Transfer to p. 403 1954; s. India (Cro) is correct riparius 18 correct spiniger 18 correct sugtharai is correct tyuzendyianus Tsuneki, 1955 is correct delete. Je lzeclercgq ’ pilifer is correct 1901 is correct insert ‘‘(Crabro)”’ after 1866 (Cl) is correct spinifer is correct alacris 1s correct 1894d is correct 1780 is correct Geoffroy in Fourcroy, 1785 is correct sabulosus is correct ‘(Geoffroy) is Fourcroy, 1785 (Vespa); local- ity?’’ ‘‘May be a Cerceris’’ is correct 1894b is correct 1894c is correct botsharnikovi is correct erythropus is correct 1971 is correct ganglbaueri is correct. Change in index change distribution to: Africa: Mali cruciger is correct 1780 is correct SIS, comect guichardi (Beaumont), 1968 (Gorytes); Canary Is. Insert in index also alicantinus 1s correct 1909, not 1910 Macropsis is correct anceps is out of chronological order, place ahead of intercedens 120 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON 504, EC, "2: 508, RC, L 4, SIO RC AES 2: oy a) OG) Gee 512; RG: 513), CE a7, S25, eC, E53: 526, 1G, E43: RG P34: 531, LC, Lb 36: RE, Ee s3): 535, aE. Ie si: 537, RC, L. 43: RE, 155: 539, LC, insert after L 47: 541, RC, L 10: 542, LC, insert after L 37: 543. LC. E80: 546 EC LW: RC, L 33-34: RE, Lb 54: 947;,,LC, Eat: 560; EGS 32: 564, RC, L.46: 566; LCL SS: 566; RCL 5: REC. 18: ieee 35—50: $79, RC, insert after L 8: 58l RC AL 38: 584, LC, L 46: S66 REE 4 RC, L 49: 587, LC, insert after L 49: 6: 50: RC, L 3-4: 589, RC, insert after L 28: 592, (EC, Ae 74; LOSE: 8: procerum is correct laminifer (Cockerell) in Cockerell and Fox,|) 1897 (Gorytes) is correct. ; Dow (1942b) is correct 1909, not 1910 spinifer is correct spinifer is correct Stizus is correct for 1941 read 1942a 1793, not 1804 Frivaldszky, 1877 is correct. Change in index 1954 is correct 221s" correct oribates is correct delete entire entry monodorta Say, 1825 (Bembex), lapsus 27 is correct gorgonensis (Cheesman), 1928 (Monedula); Co- lombia 328 is correct delete entire entry (difformis) Cameron, 1901 is correct jJerdanica is correct maldivensis Cameron, 1901 is correct (maldi- viensis is a lapsus from Zoological Record for 1902) 1897b is correct Kohl, 1884 is correct delete==ssp= Thunberg is correct Geoffroy in Fourcroy, 1785 is correct 1780 is correct copiapoensis Sielfeld, 1972; Chile delete entire entry chagatai 1s correct 1839 is correct delete entire entry schariniensis Kazenas, 1972; sw. USSR: Kazakh SSR delete both entries zoellneri Sielfeld, 1972: Chile delete ‘‘ssp”’ Cockerell and Rohwer in Rohwer, 1908 is cor- rect VOLUME 81, NUMBER 1 m7 RE, LU. 8: 998, LC, L 36: G00, LC,.L 26: Ct G..28: m2, RE, L 11: RE, E; 12: RG wld 457 , 205; 23: oo4, LC, L 58: RGFIa2: RE; i 32: 606, LC, L 47: Ee. 50: 607, LC, L 10: BE 26: ms, LC, L 24: Ga, 26: EG we 27: m9) RC; 3: RE, b, 19: oO; LC; i 2: f253 RC; last L: m8. RC. 152: m9. C,- EAs: EC, Lb 26: 634, MC, L 9: MC, b 56: MG, 1.58: RE. x65: m5. LC. 1.27: n56;, RC; L. 22: 37, MC, L 2: RE, 1.25: Po. iC, 115: BC, ti: LC, insert after L 25: 639, LC, insert after L 53: 640, MC, L 65: RE. 38: RC, L 40: RC, L 41: add hyphen after *‘Re”’ nests is correct change 1941 to 1942a change 1942 to 1942b 1894a is correct. Place reference after L 14 1893b is correct change as follows: 1894a to 1894b, 1894b to 1894c, 1894c to 1894d, 1894d to 1894e. chinesische is correct 599-699 is correct 657-942 is correct delete **(12)4:489-516"’ and substitute: Le genre Passaloecus (Shuckard) divores is correct 77-194, 317-462 is correct 1897b is correct entry should read: Les Sphecius paléarctiques. Ann. Soc. Ent. paleéarctiques is correct Mem. and (Zool.) are correct change 1858 to 1857 change 1864 to 1863 change 1838 to 1839 Munksgaard is correct majus Kohl and minus Beaumont are correct colombicus is correct crenulifer 1s correct (noun) africanum is correct alacris is correct, place after L 58 alacer is correct, place after L 56 albospinifer is correct alicantinus is correct delete 263 argentifer is correct delete ‘“‘and W. Fox”’ aspera is correct delete entire entry aspites van Lith, Psen, 166 aztecus Bohart and Grissell, Psenulus, 172 delete 587 delete ‘“‘and W.Fox”’ delete ‘‘and W.Fox’”’ and add parens after Cock- erell change 50 to 508 122 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON © 641, LC, L 44: bismarckensis is correct REEVE DS: botsharnikovi is correct 642, LC, insert after L 64: brullei (Kirchner), Tachysphex, 272 644. VE. Lf: catharinae is correct, place on p. 643 before catherinae MGs i) 32: chagatai is correct, place after L 7 RE. LG: delete ‘‘and W. Fox)’’ and add parens after Cockerell 6455 1G; Ey ~5: chrysomalla is correct 646, MC, L 48-49: transfer to RC after L 15; conifer Arnold is correct 647, LC, insert after L 17: copiapoensis Sielfeld, Cerceris, 579 Cs 1662: corporaali is correct RE: 4: 629 is correct 648, LE, E “3: cruciger is correct eC TS: delete ‘‘and W. Fox)’ and add parenthesis after Cockerell NICE 5: cyclocephala is correct 649 -C. E. 2: defiguratus is correct MC, L 17: deserticola is correct MC, L 69: delete entire entry 6515 REE 13: englebegi is correct 6521. We 22: erythopus is correct Mes 30: erythrocephala is correct LC, L 44-45, 47-48: erythropus is correct RC, L 40: exspectata is correct, place after L 48 655) RCA 42: substitute (Geoffroy) for (Fourcroy) RE. 4: delete 265 694; EC. 33: flavipes is correct RC, insert after L 25: formosensis Tsuneki, Psen, 166 655, © last Li: substitute (Geoffroy) for (Fourcroy) MiG AL 25: delete entire entry MC, L 9: frondiger is correct MC, L 39-43: insert i after ful- 656;, MGe Ie” 5: gardineri is correct RG, ‘65: delete entire entry MC, L 66: substitute (Geoffroy) for Tamer MG er 72: gobiensis is correct 657, LC, insert after L 25: gorgonensis (Cheesman), Stictia, 542 659, RC, L 64: illabefactus is correct RG, last LW: imbellis is correct 660, MC, L 5: indus is correct, insert after L 23 MCG ri 2A: indostanus is correct, insert after L 22 VOLUME 81, NUMBER 1 MC, L 48: MC, L 54-S5: MC. 56: RG, E67: 661, RC, L 54: 1662, MC, L 34, 37: 663, MC, L 65: mot; LC, L 65: Bos 11C. L 59: 666, RC, L 5: RE, 123: 667, MC, insert after L 56: 123 ifranensis is correct, place on p. 659 after id- zekil delete entire entry substitute (Geoffroy) for (Fourcroy) integer is correct, place after L 58 jordanica is correct insert 133 after Prionyx laminifer is correct, place after L 63 leguminifer Cockerell is correct entry longipes should read longiceps, place after L 40 majus is correct, place after L 10 maldivensis is correct mayorum Bohart and Grissell, Psenulus, 173 RECA 21: delete entire entry REE. 27: Megistommum and 503 should be in boldface RC. 130: melas is correct, not melaenus, place on p. 668 after melas M. Muller RCeI 69: melanopus is correct, transfer to p. 668, LC, after 15)5 Mose ie€ le o-5: melanopus is correct Genie 16: melanopyga Is correct Re. 4: melanostictus is correct 669, LC, L 38: minus is correct, place after L 52 EC S5: delete entire line LCSis61: minutissima is correct, place after L 58 BAe eMC ele. 57: nipponis is correct 57/3). RC, IL 69: odontophorus is correct, place after last L 674, MC, L 28: oribates is correct MC rls 69: delete entire entry 676, RC, L 46: substitute (Geoffroy) for (Fourcroy) ei 7, MCL ° 4: pilifer is correct MC e325: insert after pimarum: Cockerell and RG, LL 34: plumifer is correct 678, MC, L 48: procerum is correct, place after L 44 aoe la. 1553: quadrifasciatus is correct, place after L 57 pol, RC, L 3: riparius is correct 683, LC, L 40: put parenthesis around Dahlbom MC, last L: SaiguSai is correct RC, insert after L 17: salomonensis van Lith, Psenulus, 173 RCo): sandakanensis is correct 685, MC, L 27-28: 686, MC, L 22: MC, L 49: setiger 1s correct sinuosiscute is correct delete 587 124 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON Re. 1°20: 687, LC, L:55=58: EC. E65: 688, RC, L 6: RC; EA: 689°, RC; E31: 690, LC, Ly 14: 691, MC, L 31: RE VE: 692, LC, insert after L 31: eG. Aan: 695, MC, L 10: RC, insert after L 27: salomonensis is correct (insert on p. 683 as noted above) spinifer is correct, place after L 52 spiniger is correct, place after L 60 sugiharai is correct sungaral is correct tenera is correct testaceinervus is correct Bicyrtes, 537 is correct tristis 1s correct turanicus Gussakovskij, Passaloecus, 184 turcomanicus is correct yezo is correct zoellneri Sielfeld, Cerceris, 589 LITERATURE CITED Bohart, R. M. and E. E. Grissell. 1975. California Wasps of the Subfamily Philanthinae. Bull. Calif. Insect Surv. 19:1—92. Bohart, R. M. and A. S. Menke. 1976. Sphecid Wasps of the World, a Generic Revision. Univ. of California Press. Berkeley & Los Angeles. x + 695 pp. Hope, F. W. 1847. The auto-biography of John Christian Fabricius translated from the Danish, with additional notes and observations. Trans. R. Entomol. Soc. London. 4:i-xvi. Kazenas, V. L. 1974. Two new species of the genus Eremiasphecium from South-Eastern Kazakhstan. Zool. Zh. 53:1733-1736. Lomholdt, O. 1975. The Sphecidae of Fennoscandia and Denmark. Fauna Entomol. Scand. 4(1):1-224. Sielfeld, W. H. 1975. Contribucion al conocimiento de los Miscophini Neotropicales. Rev. Chil. Entomol. 8:95-116. PROC. ENTOMOL. SOC. WASH. 81(1), 1979, pp. 125-134 SOME UNUSUAL BRACONIDAE (HYMENOPTERA)! R. D. SHENEFELT 630 Oak Street, Oregon, Wisconsin 53575. Abstract.—Figures are presented to show features which may be useful in determining relationships of Gnathobracon babirussa A. Costa, Pseu- dodicrogenium monstrosum Fahringer and Bequartia gigantea Fahringer. Two new species, fuliginosa and promisca, are described in Bequartia. A new rogadine genus, Dimorphomastax, is described with peculiaris as a new species. A system for naming areas of the mandible is proposed. One of the most difficult problems in the taxonomy of Braconidae remains that of the suprageneric classification. Individuals beginning to work with the family soon realize that the segregations between subfamilies or between tribes are far from being clear and that characters overlap or do not hold. Part of the problem lies in the fact that classifications originally proposed for material from particular areas simply do not fit when the fauna of other regions is explored. Part is due to our lack of knowledge of the features of species incompletely described long ago, and some of it is due to our failure to visualize correctly specimens upon reading descriptions. Figures are often lacking and occasionally are so inaccurate as to be misleading. The combined result of these factors is a great need to restudy type-specimens and to publish the data regarding them before attempting to either confirm or restructure the higher categories within the family. The notes and dia- grams which follow are presented in order to help provide bases for clari- fication of certain questions. The diagrams were made by use of an ocular grid and squared paper. Gnathobracon babirussa A. Costa Figs. 1-7 One of the subfamilies, the Gnathobraconinae, established by Szepligeti in 1904 and based upon Gnathobracon babirussa described by A. Costa in 1864 from the northern part of South America, has long been an enigma. Through ‘the kindness of Prof. G. Viggiani, it became my privilege to ' Results of research sponsored in part by the College of Agricultural and Life Sciences and the Research Committee of the University of Wisconsin. 126 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON —— Figs. 1-7. Gnathobracon babirussa. 1, Head, antero-lateral. 2, Head, frontal. 3, La- brum. 4, Base of antenna. 5, Outline of scutellum and prescutellar furrow. 6, Outer claw posterior leg. 7, abdominal terga 1-4. Figs. 8-10. Pseudodicrogenium monstrosum. 8, Head, | front view. 9, Head, dorsal view. 10, Outer claw middle leg. VOLUME 81, NUMBER 1 127 i study and photograph the unique type which is in the collection of the Institute and Museum of Zoology, University of Naples. Though I had been unable to visualize the specimen from the descriptions, actually both those by Costa and Szépligeti were good and stressed salient features. The prob- lem lay in the fact that the insect is so different from what people who look at braconids are accustomed to seeing. The type female carries Costa’s label. Labels bearing the Museum No. 8768 and indicating that it is the specimen studied and published upon by Szépligeti are alongside. The specimen is about 13 mm long, with the ovi- positor adding about 10 mm more. Forewing length is 13 mm. Description.—Head black, polished above; thorax dark reddish brown and polished above, black below. Wings banded, pale at base, a dark band just before stigma, yellowish behind stigma, apex dark. Stigma yellow. Fore -coxae reddish, middle and posterior coxae piceous. Anterior and middle legs —testaceous with posterior femora infuscated on distal half and posterior tib- iae infuscated on apical ’%. Abdomen testaceous through tergum 4, black beyond. Head immargined, no scrobes per se, but front depressed ahead of an- terior ocellus and a groove runs from it to between antennae. Both antennae broken but at least 57 segments remain in the right antenna, segments be- yond 4th flagellar at least as wide as long. Scape and pedicel as shown in Fig. 4. Face flattened, impressed below a transverse ridge located below antennae. Not cyclostome, clypeus insunken between anterior tentorial pits, slightly raised at apex to form a low rim which becomes higher and roll-like at side. Labrum from in front appears as a great flat plate which hangs down between and behind mandibles. Enormous mandibles start out normally but then curve upward, forward and mediad, the apices crossing (see Figs. |- 2). A large open space left in front of the labrum and clypeus. Mandible, in cross section, flat on inside, rounded on outer side but becoming quite flat after bending, the upper tooth longer than the lower. Maxillary palpus 6- segmented, labial 4. Relative measurements: Malar space 10, eye height 45, eye length (anteroposteriorly) 35, temple length 20. Wing venation typical of Braconinae, i.e., submediellan cell short, ner- vulus interstitial. Relative lengths: Ist abscissa radius 4, 2nd 15, 3rd 30; Ist intercubitus 9, 2nd 7.5; upper abscissa of basal 5, lower 10. Radiellan cell does not broaden apically; Ist abscissa of mediella 10, second 30, basel- la 8. No prepectal carina or sternaulus. Notaulices very faintly impressed, in- dicated mostly by lighter color. Scutellum low, not margined, shaped as in Fig. 5. Propodeum smooth, with long, fine, whitish hairs which also occur on metapleuron and hind coxa. No chaetobothria. Outer claw of posterior leg as in Fig. 6. Major abdominal features as sketched. 128 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON Pseudodicrogenium monstrosum Fahringer Figs. 8-10 In 1936 Fahringer erected the subfamily Pseudodicrogeniinae for his mon- obasic genus Pseudodicrogenium. Van Achterberg (1976) in his key (couplet 3, p. 40) points out that ‘‘exceptionally the face takes part in the hypoclypeal depression (Tribe Pseudodicrogeniini), resulting in a concave face and flat clypeus,”’ and on p. 77 he presents drawings. On p. 35 he places the tribe in the Braconinae. There are two specimens of monstrosum, the lectotype and paralectotype respectively, in the Musée Royal de |’ Afrique Centrale at Tervuren. Based upon these specimens, whether the genus should be placed in the Bracon- inae or not might be questioned. The species is not cyclostome in the usual sense. The face is impressed, and the clypeus is bent inward and not raised at all. The labrum, continued in almost the same line as the clypeus, forms an elongated triangle which extends back between and behind the mandi- bles: and it is not concave anteriorly. The massive mandibles project for- ward and appear to arise on a projection which is the extended gena; and a space is left between the mandibles and the labrum. The front tibia carries very numerous characteristic robust reddish “‘hairs’’ or chaetobothria, most of which are about as long as the diameter of the tibia. These structures occur on the inner front aspect and, toward the apex of the tibia, tend to form into transverse rows; they are broad and appear much like the apical transverse row. It would appear that the genus is sufficiently different from the cyclostome forms that it might be held separately as Fahringer handled it. Bequartia gigantea Fahringer Figs. 11-15 Fahringer described the genus Bequartia (sic) in 1936 based upon a single male from Elizabethville. The specimen, which he named gigantea, had been collected by Dr. M. Bequaert. While Fahringer spelled the name in- correctly both in the generic name and in giving the collection data, it is obvious that an error occurred as it is written Bequaertia on the determi- nation label. However Schouteden had used Bequaertia in 1913 for an hem- ipterous genus and Pic in 1914 used Bequaertiella for a coleopterous genus. Other comparable names have been used (see Neave, 1939), and therefore it appears best to accept the generic name as it appeared originally. Through the kindness of Dr. J. Decelle, I was able to examine and pho- tograph the unique type which is housed in the Musée Royal de |’ Afrique Centrale. While the genus belongs to the Rogadinae as Fahringer indicated, certain corrections should be made in the original description. The maxillary | palpi are 6-segmented; and the terminal segments are normal, not as Fah- ringer drew them. The prescutellar furrow is crenulate and is crossed by | VOLUME 81, NUMBER 1 129 carinae. The radius emerges at about the basal one-third of the stigma, and the stigma is relatively narrow. The area just behind the stigma is deeply pigmented; and, at first glance, the stigma appears much wider than it ac- tually is. Because of the color pattern, one must sometimes look closely to see where the radius actually emerges. The first abscissa of the radius is decidedly thickened at the base but rapidly becomes more slender as illus- trated in Fig. 13. The sculpture of the abdomen is much finer than Fahrin- ger’s diagram would indicate and is rather typical. The claws are finely pectinate, and the posterior tibial spurs straight. Six additional specimens (including two females) of gigantea in the British Museum of Natural History in London, an additional female from the col- lection in Tervuren, and four specimens representing two additional species enable further characterization of the genus. In addition to the usual roga- dine features, the thickened base of the radius and the strongly incrassate hind tarsi are distinctive. (In the female the posterior tarsus, while thick- ened, is less so than in the male.) The prepectal carina is present. On the base of the propodeum occurs a most unusual structure which is more highly developed in males than in females, although its degree of development in the males varies some. In the female this structure is like a pair of horizontal, flat, rimmed areas, with the posterior rim being highest near their juncture in the middle. The flat area is covered by very dense pile-like hair. In the males the pile-covered area is much larger, the maximum development being as indicated in Fig. 11. It is tumescent, raised centrally; and at its apex the pile-covered surface appears to slide under the regular propodeal covering. The propodeum is decidedly raised (bulged) on each side behind the pile- bearing area. Two females and four males collected by S. A. Neave at Mlanje, Nyasa- land in Oct. 1912, Jan. 1913 or Dec. 1913 are in the British Museum of Natural History and one female taken by F. G. Overlast at Lulua: Riv. Luisa X-1933 is in Tervuren. Bequartia fuliginosa Shenefelt, NEW SPECIES Differs from gigantea primarily in having the wings infuscated, excepting only the very base of the stigma and the parastigma which are testaceous. Holotype.—d, *‘Coll. Mus Congo. Ruanda: Rukoma (cheff.) Terr. Nyan- za I-1953, P. Basilewsky”’ in the Musée Royal de l'Afrique Centrale at Tervuren. Description.—Length 16 mm. Forewing length 14 mm. Wings dark brown excepting lighter base of stigma, parastigma and adjacent part of basal. Eyes, antennae, anterior pretarsi, middle tarsi, posterior tibiae and tarsi black. Otherwise ferrugineous. Paratypes—TERVUREN: ‘‘Musée du Congo. Katanga: Kansenia XI- 1930, G. F. de Witte’? 1 6. BRITISH MUSEUM (NATURAL HISTORY): 130 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON 18 sisted 20 19 Figs. 11-15. Bequartia gigantea. 11, Propodeum of male showing pile covered area at base. 12, Same in female. 13, Stigma, bases of radius and basal. 14, Palpi of male (first VOLUME 81, NUMBER 1 131 **Salisbury Mashonaland. Nov. 1899, G. A. K. Marshall. *124°’. Marshall Coll. 1909-323,’ 1 6. Bequartia promisca Shenefelt, NEW SPECIES Differs from gigantea and fuliginosa in its smaller size, in the wings being infuscated excepting the testaceous parastigma, a pale spot surrounding the juncture of the recurrent and the cubitus and a pale transverse band ex- tending across the posterior half of the radial cell, the base of the third cubital cell and into the second discoidal. Holotype.—°?, ‘‘Uganda, Sukh Plains, Nr. Nepal Pass 1931. Dr. E. B. Worthington. Cambridge Univ. Exp. B. M. 1931-545”’ in the British Mu- seum (Natural History). Description.—Length 13 mm. Forewing length 12 mm. Wings brown ex- cept as indicated above. Head and thorax testaceous, abdomen ferrugi- neous. Eyes and antennae black. Anterior pretarsi, middle tarsi, posterior tibiae and tarsi dark brown. Antennae distinctly longer than body, with 90 segments in flagellum. Dimorphomastax Shenefelt, NEW GENUS To describe the structure involved here, it is necessary to review the structure of the mandible and to propose certain new terms. Each mandible is articulated anteriorly and posteriorly and is attached to the ventral margin of the cranial wall by membrane between the articulations. At the anterior articulation, a process from the subgena fits into a cavity of the mandible called the acetabulum, which is located on the inner basal angle of the mandible. (Imms calls this the ginglymus of the mandible.) At the posterior articulation, the mandible carries a projection known as the condyle (=pos- tartis). This bulbous structure fits into a socket of the subgenal wall near the distal end of the hypostomal carina. Each mandible may be regarded as essentially a hollow tetrahedral structure. If the base of the bottom triangle is thought of as being formed by the portion between the acetabulum and the condyle and this is regarded as the outside, the adductor muscle is attached at approximately the apex. Actually, the outer surface of the man- dible, extending distally from what we have been calling the base of the bottom triangle, may be bowed outward or bent in other shapes. Likewise the upper inner face, extending distad from the side of the basal triangle an segment not shown on maxillary palpus). 15, Outer claw of hind leg, from type. Figs. 16-20. Dimorphomastax peculiaris. 16, Head of type from front. 17, Outline of left mandible of type male. 18, Outline left mandible of allotype female. 19, Outer hind claw of type. 20, Inner spur of posterior tibia of male. 132 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON from the acetabulum to the apex, may be invaginated (bent toward the middle of the mandible in cross section) so the mandible becomes concave on the inner aspect. The third side of the bottom triangle, from the condyle to the apex, serves as the base of the underside of the mandible or the lower inner surface. The angles between the three sides vary considerably from species to species both in sharpness and in degree, and the mandible is often twisted in such a way that the teeth of the mandibles meet each other in a vertical instead of a horizontal plane, or the mandible may be modified in other ways. With downward extension of the postgena, the acetabular-con- dylar line may become practically vertical so the anterior articulation of the mandible appears dorsal. Obviously a structure such as that described and used for biting or crush- ing needs strengthening. And the mandible is very often braced by a sharp edge or carina which can be called the condylar carina as it runs from the condyle along the lower edge of the outer face of the pyramid to the lower tooth or a little above it. A similar carina may be developed along the upper (anterior) edge of the mandible and proceeds from the acetabulum to or nearly to the upper tooth. This may appropriately be called the acetabular carina. The carinae tend to be most robust near their origins. On either or both sides of the carinae grooves may appear, especially along the condylar. When this occurs, a bracing ledge is formed which may be quite plate-like and which serves as a buttress. Between the two carinae the outer face of the mandible may be sculptured in various ways. In contrast, the upper inner face is normally smooth. The lower surface or third face of the pyr- amid, i.e., that portion extending from the condylar carina to the smooth, usually concave portion, is often flat and is usually much narrowed near the teeth and suddenly broadened toward the base where the adductor muscle is attached. Frequently a thickening of the mandibular wall occurs around the basal margin. This reinforcement is normally set off by a shallow groove around the margin and is most evident along the base of the lower side. While the lower side may carry sensoria and hairs, it has been utilized very little in classification. In Dimorphomastax the condylar carina has undergone strange devel- opment. In the male the base of the carina has been produced outwards to such an extent that it appears like a sickle, and the two projections together appear like a second set of mandibles. In the female the outgrowth is limited to a lamellar, triangular tooth. This modification of the base of the condylar carina will at once separate the genus from all other rogadine genera. The prepectus is margined; the recurrent enters the first cubital cell; the antennae are multiarticulate; the propodeum is not armed; there are three cubital cells; the first abscissa of the mediella is longer than the second; the spiracles of the first abdominal tergite are normal; the tarsi are normal; the first ab- it VOLUME 81, NUMBER 1 133 dominal tergum is broadened posteriorly; the suturiform articulation is dis- tinct; the claws are coarsely pectinate; the sternaulus is absent. Type for the Genus.—Dimorphomastax peculiaris, new species. Dimorphomastax peculiaris Shenefelt, NEW SPECIES Figs. 16-20 Holotype.— 6, **6 mi. S. Durango, Dgo. MEX. 6100’ July 14, 1964, W. R. M. Mason.”’ In the Canadian National Collection at Ottawa. Description.—Length 4.8 mm. Forewing length 5.0 mm. Head, excepting testaceous to brown mouthparts, black. Antennae brown. Mesonotum black, metanotum and apex of scutellum margined with testaceous, remain- der of thorax brownish to piceous. Legs, including coxae, testaceous; pre- tarsi darkened. Abdomen testaceous. Face finely granular. Both antennae broken but 41 segments remain in flagellum of left antenna. All flagellar segments longer than wide. Notaulices distinct. Mesonotal sculpture of ovoid pits separated by about their diameter and surrounded by shining plaquettes which mostly appear as 2 rows on the intervals between the pits. Propodeal spiracle oval. Propodeum finely granular-rugose, with a median carina on basal 4. Scutellum covered by fine shining plaquettes which are smaller than those between the pits on the mesonotum. Sternaulus absent. Mesopleuron punctulate on lower 43, roughened below anterior wing base, mesopleural fovea and speculum distinct. Wings lightly infuscated. Radius emerging beyond middle of stigma, inner margin to outer margin as 4:3. First abscissa of discoideus shorter than 2nd (as 13:16). Radiellan cell wid- ening distally, postnervellus present, Ist abscissa of mediella longer than 2nd (as 32:25). Abdominal terga 1, 2 and basal 2 of 3 longitudinally strigose with shining spots along the irregular carinae and with a median carina. Boss at base of 2 short, about '/,. as long as the tergum, and extending across middle 4%. Terga 4—7 depressed anteriorly and with dense bands of long golden hairs across the middle. Tergum 5 with a fringe of apical hairs. Posterior tibial spurs blunt. Allotype.—?, ““MEX. Dgo. 7 mi. W. Durango, 7000’ 29 July 1964, W. R. M. Mason.”’ In the Canadian National Collection at Ottawa. Differs from the 6 in having the condylar carina produced only into a triangular tooth at base, in having the posterior tibial spurs pointed and in having terga 4—7 alutaceous, sparsely hairy, not impressed. Tergum 5 lacks the fringe of apical hairs. The flagellum has 46 segments; the apical one conical at the tip. The ovipositor sheath is dark and is approximately as long as the second segment of the middle tarsus. Paratypes CANADIAN NATIONAL COLLECTION in Ottawa: 7 mi. W. Durango MEX. 29.VII.64 L. A. Kelton, 1 ¢; Santa Lucia, Sin. MEX. 4-VIII-1964 4000’, J. F. McAlpine, 1 ¢ and 1 9; MEX. Sin. 15 mi. W. El 134 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON Palmito, 5000’ 11 July 1964, W. R. M. Mason, | 6. MUSEUM d’HISTOIRE NATURELLE in Genéve: Mexigq. Orizaba, | 6. RISKSMUSEUM van NATUURLIJKE HISTORIE in Leiden: Meseum Leiden. MEXICO, Ve- racruz, Fortin, 900 m 1.XII.1962, C. & O. Epping, 1 ¢6. ENTOMOLOGY MUSEUM, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN at East Lansing: Rio Blanca, V.C., Mex. 11-13-57, R. & K. Dreisbach, 1 6. AMERICAN ENTOMO- LOGICAL INSTITUTE at Ann Arbor, Michigan: Portal, Ariz. VIII-26- 1974, H. & M. Townes, | 6; Portal, Ariz. VIII-24-1974, IX-2-1974, [X-5- 1974 and IX-9-1974, H. & M. Townes, 4 °°. Discussion.—In the paratype males the outgrowth from the condylar ca- rina varies in width from nearly as wide as the base of the mandible to only about 4 the width and in length from about 34 to longer than the mandible. The ‘tooth’ on the female also varies in size. The thorax is mostly testaceous in two of the males. In size the males vary from a little less than 5 mm to over 7 mm. ACKNOWLEDGMENT I am deeply indebted to Dr. W. R. M. Mason for calling the peculiar mandibles to my attention and then loaning his material so that I could describe it. Thanks are also due to the individuals and institutions in which I found specimens for their so willingly allowing me to borrow them. LITERATURE CITED Costa, A. (1862) 1864. Acquisiti fatte durante l’anno 1862. Annu. R. Mus. Zool. R. Univ. Napoli. 2:70. Fahringer, J. 1936. Uber einige merkwiirdige und seltene Hymenopteren-Gattungen aus Af- rika. Festschr. 60. Geburtst. E. Strand, Riga. 1:571, 573. Neave, S. A. 1939. Nomenclator Zoologicus. Zool. Soc. London. Vol. 1, pp. 419-420. Pic, M. 1914. Nouveaux Coleopteres du Congo et d’Afrique orientale au Musée du Congo. Rev. Zool. Afr. 3:486. Schouteden, H. 1913. Reduviidae, Nabidae et Pyrrhocoridae recueillis au Congo par le Dr. J. Bequaert. Rev. Zool. Afr. 2:242. Szépligeti, G. V. 1904. Uber Gnathobracon A. Costa. Annu. R. Mus. Zool. R. Univ. Napoli @s) 10 7a Van Achterberg, C. 1976. A preliminary key to the subfamilies of the Braconidae (Hymenop- tera). Tijdschr. Entomol. 119(3):34. PROC. ENTOMOL. SOC. WASH. 81(1), 1979, pp. 135-144 MACROLEPIDOPTERAN MOTHS LIGHT-TRAPPED IN A NEW JERSEY OAK FOREST (LEPIDOPTERA) JONATHAN D. MOULDING AND JAMES J. MADENJIAN Department of Entomology and Economic Zoology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903 (present address of JOM: Environment and Resources Branch, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, P.O. Box 4970, Jacksonville, Florida 32201). Abstract.—Light trapping was conducted for five years in a virgin oak forest on the New Jersey Piedmont Plateau. A total of 410 species of moths were recorded from 14 families. This includes about a third of all the species of macrolepidopteran moths recorded in New Jersey. The total catch of each species is listed, and the species are ranked within family by abun- dance. The most abundant species, Lithacodia carneola Gn., represented about 8% of the total catch, and the top 15 species represented about 50%. A five year study was conducted to quantify the taxonomic structure and phenology of the moth community in a small forest in central New Jersey. The objectives of the study were to examine ecological aspects of the com- munity and to evaluate the stability of the community in the wake of an expected gypsy moth outbreak. The latter did not materialize (Moulding, 1977), but the first objective has been achieved. This paper describes the taxonomic composition of the macrolepidopteran moths collected by light-trapping in the forest from 1973 to 1977 during the seasons extending from early March to mid-October. METHODS AND RESULTS The collecting site was Hutcheson Memorial Forest (HMF), located on the New Jersey Piedmont Plateau near the town of East Millstone, Somerset County (40°30'N, 74°34’W). It is a mature (over 250 years old), mixed-oak forest of 65 acres surrounded by old fields in various stages of abandonment and cultivated fields of corn, soybean and winter rye. Monk (1961) char- acterized the upland part of the forest (82% of the area) as having a mixed- oak canopy, flowering dogwood understory and maple-leaved viburnum shrub layer. Frei and Fairbrothers (1963) in an extensive inventory of the flora of the forest and edge recorded 40 species of trees, 39 of shrubs and 232 of herbs; 71 of the total were considered exotic (non-native) species. The forest is believed to have had a minimum of human interference since 136 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON z Sait RO. See Fig. 1. Moth light-trap noe sites. (Aerial eae flown on 9 February 1976.) colonial times. No fires or significant cutting have apparently occurred since the early 1700’s. Under Rutgers’ study since 1948 and ownership since 1955 it has been established as an ecological preserve; and insecticides are knowr never to have been applied. Moths were collected by four 6-watt, photo-cell- controlled: UV light traps (Ellisco Co., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) located at permanent sampling sites in the central part of the forest (Fig. 1). A weekly sampling regime wa: established, and the nights were chosen to avoid rain, wind and unseason-) ably low temperatures in order to minimize non-seasonal environmenta} variables. Moon effects were avoided as much as possible by choosing: cloudy nights when practical. Collections were made during the years 1973-} VOLUME 81, NUMBER 1 137 Table 1. Seasonal sampling intensity. Total number of nights trapped Early Mid Late March 2 1 2 April 0 3 2 May 2 yp 3 June 2 4 2 July 5) 5 7 August 5 5) 4 September 5 3 3} October 4 3 0 1977, with the collecting season varying somewhat from year to year as shown in Table 1. In 1973, all traps were placed at a height of 1.8 m above the ground. During the remaining years, the middle two traps were raised on pulleys attached to white oaks to a height of 18 m. Moths were identified by comparison with specimens in the insect mu- seum of the Rutgers’ Department of Entomology and Economic Zoology, and voucher specimens from the trapping were put into the collection. Only moths belonging to the division Macrolepidoptera were tallied by species. From a total of 293 trap-nights, 22,880 individual moths were collected and represented 410 species in 14 families. These are listed by family in Table 2; the species within a family are ranked in decreasing order of abun- dance. Scientific nomenclature is based on McDunnough (1938) as amended in recent years. DISCUSSION Exclusive of sub-species and infrasub-specific variants, there are 1258 species of macrolepidopteran moths recorded from New Jersey (Smith, 1909; Muller, 1965, 1968, 1973, 1976). Some of the species listed by Smith may have since been extirpated in New Jersey due to habitat destruction; other species are being added to the record at a rate of about 10 per year by Muller, who to our knowledge is the only New Jersey worker active in this area. The present study adds six new species to the published record of New Jersey species. Five of these are represented by New Jersey spec- imens already in the Rutgers’ insect museum and so have probably been merely overlooked or confused with closely related species in the past. Our specimen of Callopistria floridensis Gn. is to our knowledge the first record for New Jersey. This, however, is not ecologically significant since it is described as a sometimes-greenhouse-pest from Florida and thus it probably is not viable as a resident in the New Jersey climate. 138 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON able: family in order of decreasing abundance. Species NOCTUIDAE Lithacodia carneola Gn. L. muscosula Gn. Graphiphora c-nigrum L. Ogdoconta cinereola Gn. Palthis asopialis Gn. Zanclognatha cruralis Gn. Agrotis ypsilon Rott. Spragueia leo Gn. Ochropleura plecta L. Cosmia calami Harv. Phoberia atomaris Hbn. Anorthodes tarda Gn. Plathypena scabra Fabr. Pseudaletia unipuncta Haw. Euplexia benesimilis L. Xanthoptera nigrofimbria Gn. Epizeuxis aemula Hbn. Palthis angulalis Hbn. Papaipema marginidens Gn. Orthosia hibisci Gn. Papaipema harrisi Grt. Orthodes cynica Gn. Lacinipolia renigera Steph. Cerastis tenebrifera Wlk. Phalaenophana pyramusalis Wk. Tarachidia erastrioides Gn. Catocala amica Hbn. Zanclognatha pedipilalis Gn. Bomolocha baltimoralis Gn. Pseudorthodes vecors Gn. Lithacodia synochitis G. & R. Elaphria grata Hbn. Sunira bicolorago Gn. Lascoria ambigualis Wk. Nephelodes emmedonia Cram. Acronicta modica Wlk. Zanclognatha jacchusalis Wk. Choephora fungorum G. & R. Zanclognatha ochreipennis Grt. Renia salusalis Wlk. Spodoptera ornithogalli Gn. Graphiphora smithi Snell Protolampra brunneicollis Grt. Epizeuxis americalis Gn. Total Catch 1565 619 465 313 284 282 237 186 180 175 171 143 140 139 116 110 102 95 93 91 89 86 82 78 75 73 67 66 58 58 57 56 55 54 52 47 46 42 40 38 35 34 34 33 Species Graphiphora badinodis Grt. Philometra eumelusalis Wk. Tarachidia candefacta Hbn. Hormisa orciferalis Wk. Leucania ursula Forbes Phalaenostola larentioides Grt. Platysenta videns Gn. Tetanolita floridana Sm. Amphipyra pyramidoides Gn. Catocala micronympha Gn. Apamea americana Speyer Galgula partita Gn. Orthosia rubescens Wk. Metaxaglaea inulta Gtt. Elaphria versicolor Grt. Zale horrida Hbn. Crocigrapha normani Gtt. Orthodes crenulata Butl. Acronicta exilis Grt. Autographa precationis Gn. Caenurgina crassiuscula Haw. Leuconycta diphteroides Gn. Papaipema impecuniosa Grt. Leucania multilinea Wk. Neoerastria apicosa McD. Polygrammate hebraeicum Hbn. Renia factiosalis Wk. Leucania phragmatidicola Gn. Panopoda rufimargo Hbn. Rivula propinqualis Gn. Schinia arcigera Gn. Tricholita signata Wk. Catocala ultronia Hbn. Peridroma margaritosa Haw. Procus modica Gn. Spargaloma sexpunctata Grt. Psaphida grotei Morr. . Redectis vitrea Grt. Zanclognatha lituralis Hbn. Graphiphora bicarnea Gn. Proxenus miranda Grt. Balsa malana Fitch Orthosia revicta Morr. Paectes oculatrix Gn. Zanclognatha protumnusalis Wk. Epizeuxis lubricalis Geyer Listing by family of species caught in forest traps. Species are ranked within Total Catch 33 33 38 32 31 31 31 Sil 30 30 27 27 27 26 25 24 22 22 21 21 21 21 21 20 19 19 19 18 17 15 15 15 14 14 14 14 13 13 13 12 12 11 11 11 11 10 - VOLUME 81, NUMBER 1 Table 2. Continued. Achatodes zeae Harr. 9 Feltia ducens WIk. Lithophane antennata Wlk. Stirioides obtusa H.-S. Zanclognatha laevigata Grt. Agrapha aerea Hbn. Amolita fessa Grt. Baileya levitans Sm. Chamyris cerintha Treit. Eupsilia sidus Gn. Phosphila turbulenta Hbn. Renia discoloralis Gn. Scolecocampa liburna Geyer Spodoptera frugiperda J. E. Smith Acronicta afflicta Grt. Agrotis venerabilis Wlk. Chytolita morbidalis Gn. Epidelta metonalis Wk. Eupsilia morrisoni Grt. Feltia herilis Grt. Hyppa xylinoides Gn. Leucania commoides Gn. Marathyssa inficita Wlk. Metalectra discalis Grt. Mocis texana Morr. Parallelia bistriaris Hbn. Platysenta vecors Gn. Polia subjuncta G. & R. Pyreferra hesperidago Gn. Amphipyra tragopoginis L. ANA NWNNDNDNDNANDNADNHAAHAAA IN AYANOOMOMOMmwwWOWwo wo Bleptina caradrinalis Gn. 5 Catocala grynea Cram. 5 Eueretagrotis sigmoides Gn. 5 Graphiphora tenuicula Morr. 5) Hormisa litophora Grt. 5 Perigea xanthioides Gn. 5 Zale lineosa Wk. 5) Acronicta haesitata Grt. 4 A. ovata Grt. 4 Apamea velata WIk. 4 Baileya australis Grt. 4 Balsa labecula Grt. 4 B. tristrigella Wk. 4 Chytonix palliatricula Gn. 4 Crambodes talidiformis Gn. 4 Cryphia pervertens B. & McD. 4 Feltia subgothica Haw. Harrisimemna trisignata Wk. Morrisonia evicta Grt. Nedra ramosula Gn. Pangrapta decoralis Hbn. Zale lunata Dru. Z. lunifera Hbn. Acronicta hasta Gn. Agroperina dubitans Wk. Catocala andromedae Gn. Cryphia villificans B. & McD. Lacinipolia lorea Gn. Leucania pseudargyria Gn. Papaipema cerussata Grt. P. nebris Gn. Procus exhausta Sm. P. mactata Gn. Schinia marginata Haw. Zale aeruginosa Gn. Acronicta caesarea Sm. Anagrapha falcifera Kby. Anticarsia gemmatilis Hbn. Baileya dormitans Gn. B. opthalmica Gn. Bomolocha toreuta Grt. Catocala connubialis Gn. C. ilia Cram. Celiptera frustulum Gn. Charadra deridens Gn. Eucirrhoedia pampina Gn. Euherrichia monetifera Gn. Heliothis zeae Harr. Tsogona natatrix Gn. Leucania linita Gn. Lithophane hemina Girt. L. laticinerea Grt. L. petulca Grt. Morrisonia confusa Hbn. Panopoda carneicosta Gn. Papaipema duovata Bird Parathisanotia grata Fabr. Plusiodonta compressipalpis Gn. Polia distincta Hbn. Procus crytora Franc. Renia flavipunctalis Geyer Schinia lynx Gn. 139 Total Total Species Catch Species Catch Rhynchagrotis anchocelioides Gn. 10 Farontia diffusa Wk. NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNW WWW WwWWwWDWwWwWwWwNnhh RRA RA AD 140 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON! Table 2. Continued. Species Spodoptera exigua Hbn. Tetanolita mynesalis Wk. Ulolonche culea Gn. Zale galbanata Morr. Acontia aprica Hbn. Acronicta americana Harr. A. brumosa Gn. A. interrupta Gn. A. lithospila Grt. A. vinnula Grt. Agriopodes teratophora H.-S. Allotria elonympha Hbn. Anaplectoides prasina Schiff. Anathix ralla G. & R. Bomolocha bijugalis Wlk. Caenurgina erechtea Cram. Callopistria floridensis Gn. Catabena lineolata Wk. Catocala gracilis Edw. C. minuta Edw. C. muliercula Gn. Chytolita petrealis Grt. Cucullia asteroides Gn. Dypterygia scabriuscula L. Epizeuxis denticulalis Harv. E. forbesi French Euagrotis illapsa Wik. Eurois occulta L. Euthisanotia unio Hbn. Feltia annexa Treit. Graphiphora normaniana Grt. Haploolophus mollissima Gn. Heptagrotis phyllophora Grt. Hypsoropha hormos Hbn. Lacinipolia meditata Grt. Ledaea perditalis Wlk. Lithacodia musta G. & R. Lithophane bethunei G. & R. Loxagrotis acclivis Morr. Metalectra tantillus Grt. Paectes abrostoloides Gn. Papaipema maritima Bird Phlogophora periculosa Gn. Phosphila miselioides Gn. Polia adjuncta Bdv. P. detracta Wlk. Procus fractilinea Grt. Lc ce cc ce ee Ta OTTO ND YT OO YT NS Species Protocryphia secta Grt. Protorthodes oviduca Gn. Psaphida resumens Wk. Pseudeva purpurigea Wk. Pseudoplusia oo Cram. Pyrrhia umbra Hufn. Raphia frater Grt. Schinia nundina Dru. S. obscurata Stkr. Xylomyges alternans Wk. Xystopeplus rufago Hbn. Zale minerea Gn. GEOMETRIDAE Nematocampa limbata Haw. Hypagyrtis subatomaria Wood Eupithecia miserulata Grt. Itame pustularia Gn. Pero honestarius Wlk. Anacamptodes ephyraria Wk. Eugonobapta nivosaria Gn. Anavitrinella pampinaria Gn. Xanthorhoe lacustrata Gn. Hyperetis nepiasaria Wlk. Bapta vestaliata Gn. Nycterosea obstipata Fabr. Hyperetis amicaria H.-S. Lygris diversilineata Hbn. Abbottana clemataria J. E. Smith Pleuroprucha insulsaria Gn. Campaea perlata Gn. Cosymbia packardaria Prout Ectropis crepuscularia Schiff. Nemoria bistriaria Hbn. Scopula limboundata Haw. Phigalia denticulata Hulst Melanolophia canadaria Gn. Euphyia centrostrigaria Woll. Prochoerodes transversata Dru. Synchlora aerata Fabr. Xanthotype sospeta Dru. Metarranthis homuraria Grt. Melanolophia signataria Wlk. Ennomos subsignarius Hbn. Tetracis cachexiata Gn. Euchlaena decisaria W\k. Plagodis fervidaria H.-S. Catch 1354 953 850 607 530 446 398 365 287 266 221 174 167 134 125 117 116 115 113 111 VOLUME 81, NUMBER | Table 2. Continued. ; Total Total Species Catch Species Catch Epimecis hortaria Fabr. 43. =P. phlogosaria Gn. 2 Timandra amaturaria Wlk. 38 3=Semiothisa continuata Wlk. 2 Chlorochlamys chloroleucaria Gn. 37. ~—soS. ocellinata Gn. 2 Antepione thisoaria Gn. 36 »=©Anagoga occiduaria Wlk. 1 Xanthorhoe ferrugata Clerck. 35. Chlorissa pistasciaria Gn. l - Apicia confusaria Hbn. 33. = Earophila vasiliata Gn. l Besma quercivoraria Gn. 28 Eubaphe mendica Wlk. 1 Phigalia titea Cran. 27. ~=—Euchlaena irraria B. & McD. 1 Sicya macularia Harr. 25 Hydriomena pluviata Gn. 1 Hyperetis alienaria H.-S. 24 Lambdina athasaria W\k. l Cosymbia pendulinaria Gn. 23. Metarranthis duaria Gn. l Paleacrita vernata Peck 23. M. obfirmaria Hbn. 1 Orthofidonia tinctaria Wlk. 19 Nyrdria prunivorata Ferg. l Euchlaena serrata Dru. 16 Paleacrita merriccata Dyar. l Heterophleps triguttaria H.-S. 16 = =Priocycla armataria H.-S. l Phigalia strigataria Minot 16 Protitame virginalis Hlst. l Euchlaena amoenaria Gn. 15 Semiothisa bisignata Wlk. 1 Scopula inductata Gn. 13. Tornos scolopacinarius Gn. l Dichorda iridaria Gn. 1] Haematopis grataria Fabr. 11 NOTODONTIDAE Dyspteris abortivaria H.-S. 8 Heterocampa guttivitta WIk. 202 Metarranthis hypochraria H.-S. 8 H. biundata Wk. 164 Neodezia albovittata Gn. 8 Nadata gibbosa J. E. Smith 89 Itame coortaria Hulst 7 Lophodonta angulosa J. E. Smith 34 Semiothisa aemulataria Wlk. 7 Schizura unicornis J. E. Smith 10 Anacamptodes larvaria Gn. 6 Oligocentria lignicolor Wlk. 9 Biston betularia Gn. 6 Heterocampa manteo Dbldy. oi Euchlaena johnsonaria Fitch 6 Schizura ipomoeae Dbldy. 6 Hydrelia albifera WIk. 6 Heterocampa varia Wk. 5 Semiothisa multilineata Pack. 6 Datana contracta Wk. 4 Plagodis phlogosaria Pears. 5 Hyperaeschra georgica H.-S. 4 Protoboarmia porcelaria Gn. 5 Nerice bidentata Wk. 4 Sterrha demissaria Hbn. 5 Fentonia marthesia Cram. 3 Syssaura puber G. & R. 5 Symmerista canicosta Franc. 3 Anacamptodes humaria Gn. 4 Gluphisia septentrionalis W\k. 2 Coryphista meadi Pack. 4 = Schizura leptinoides Grt. 2 Euphyia intermediata Gn. 4S. semirufescens WIk. 2 Lytrosis unitaria H.-S. 4 Datana integerrima G. & R. 1 Deuteronomus magnarius Gn. 3. D. major G. & R. | Eupithecia spp. 3. Ellida caniplaga Walk. | Metarranthis broweri Rupert 3. Heterocampa bilineata Pack. | Tetracis crocallata Gn. 3. Ichthyura albosigma Fitch 1 Thysanopyge gausaparia Grt. 3. Schizura badia Pack. I Heliomata cycladata Grt. 2 Horisme intestinata Gn. 2 ARCTHDAE Mellilla xanthometata Wlk. 2 Halisidota tessellaris J. E. Smith 997 Plagodis alcoolaria Gn. 2 Diacrisia latipennis Stretch 187 142 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON Table 2. Continued. Total Total Species Catch Species Catch D. virginica Fabr. 115. M. disstria Hbn. 105 Cycnia tenera Hbn. 90 Tolype velleda Stoll. 48 Estigmene congrua Wlk. 71 Euchaetias egle Dru. 41 DREFANIDAE Eubaphe opella Grt. 38 Oreta rosea Wik. 32 Isia isabella J. E. Smith 33. Drepana arcuata Wlk. 2 Hyphantria textor Harr. 6 Eudeilinia herminiata Gn. 2 Apantesis phalerata Harr. 5) THY ATIRIDAE A. virgo L. 2 Hyphantria cunea Dru. 2. Euthyatira pudens Gn. 3 Crambidia pallida Pack. 1 Pseudothyatira cymatophoroides Gn. 2 C. uniformis Dyer 1 Habrosyne scripta Gosse 1 Cycnia inopinatus Hy. Edw. 1 SATURNIIDAE Phragmatobia assimilans Wlk. 1 P. lineata Donahue | Automeris io Fabr. 3 Actias luna L. 1 SPHINGIDAE Antheraea polyphemus Cram. 1 Paonias excaecatus J. E. Smith 18 Dryocampa rubicunda Fabr. I P. myops J. E. Smith 7 Ceratomia undulosa Wk. 6 NOEIDE Deidamia inscripta Harr. 4 Sarbena minuscula Zell. 186 Cressonia juglandis J. E. Smith 1 Celama triquetrana Fitch 3 Darapsa pholus Cram. 1 Eumorpha satellitia L. 1 APATELODIDAE Olceclostera angelica Grt. 85 LYMANTRIIDAE Apatelodes torrefacta J. E. Smith 5 Lymantria dispar L. 328 Orgyia leucostigma A. & S. 255 EPIPLEMIDAE O. definita Pack. 10 Calledapteryx dryopterata Grt. 155 LASIOCAMPIDAE CTENUCHIDAE Malacosoma americana Fabr. 413. Cisseps fulvicollis Hbn. 90 The relative abundance of each species as shown in Table 2 must be interpreted with some caution. Sampling intensity and trapping efficiency were not equal at all seasons. Temperature was the most important uncon- trolled environmental factor affecting the size of the catch. During the fall and early spring, night temperatures often fell below the 5°C (40°F) activity threshold. The adequacy of the catch as a proportional representation of the existing moth community therefore depended upon the ability to capitalize | on the few and randomly occurring warm nights during these seasons. If there was snow cover, any winter moths dormant in the leaf litter would be prevented from flying even if the air temperature was high enough. Late fall | VOLUME 81, NUMBER 1 143 moths may not have been adequately sampled. Trapping was discontinued in mid-October when the hunting (poaching) season began and falling leaves tended to block the trap funnels. This was too early to catch the fall can- kerworm (Alsophila pometaria Harr.) which is known to be present in the forest. It should be recognized also that, while almost all moths will come to light, they may have differential responses to the attraction such that trapping efficiency would vary among the species. This has been demon- strated for the Catocala (Sargent, 1976). It is difficult to delineate the exact physical boundaries of the community from which the species in this study were drawn. The placement of the traps, a minimum of 100 m back from the edges of the surrounding fields, undoubtedly limited the catch to the moths present in the forest. The lights were not visible from the fields during most of the season, and the attractant range of even larger blacklight traps has been found not to exceed 30 m (Hartstack et al., 1971). However, a number of the species caught are wide- ranging migrants; and others may have been blown into the forest from other habitats, thereby being non-residents of the community within the forest. Occurrences with strong stochastic elements such as these contribute in part to the tally of species represented by only one individual. An analysis of the comparative richness of the HMF community is ham- pered by the lack of available studies in similar environments. The closest known study is one conducted for four years at Orono, Maine over a shorter season but with somewhat greater sampling intensity (Dirks, 1937). From 56,131 specimens, Dirks recorded 344 species of macrolepidopteran moths, 120 of which are shared with the HMF community. Williams (1939), col- lected 356 species involving 76,755 specimens at Rothamsted, England over four years. Preston (1948) gives data for two other unpublished moth light- trapping studies: King in Saskatchewan, Canada reported 277 species from 87,110 specimens over 22 years; and Seaman in Alberta, Canada reported 291 species from 303,251 specimens over 22 years. The greater species rich- ness of the HMF collection may be directly or indirectly attributable to the warmer climate and greater plant species diversity of the eastern North American deciduous forest biome. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Appreciation is expressed to J. P. Reed and R. F. Denno for help in identifying some specimens and to F. H. Rindge for reviewing the nomen- clature of the Geometridae. This study was funded in part by a USDA sponsored program entitled *‘The Expanded Gypsy Moth Research and Development Program,’ U.S. Forest Service, Cooperative Agreement No. 42-165. This is a paper of the Journal Series, New Jersey Agricultural Ex- periment Station, Cook College, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey. 144 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON LITERATURE CITED Dirks, C. O. 1937. Biological studies of Maine moths by light trap methods. Maine Agric. Expt. Stn. Bull. 389. Frei, K. R. and D. E. Fairbrothers. 1963. Floristic study of the William L. Hutcheson Me- morial Forest (New Jersey) Bull. Torrey Bot. Club. 90:338-355. Hartstack, A. W., Jr., J. P. Hollingsworth, R. L. Ridgway and H. H. Hunt. 1971. Determi- nation of trap spacings required to control an insect population. J. Econ. Entomol. 64: 1090-1100. McDunnough, J. H. 1938. Check list of the Lepidoptera of Canada and the U.S.A. Pt. 1, Macrolepidoptera. Memoirs South. Calif. Acad. Sci., Mem. 1. Monk, C. D. 1961. The vegetation of William L. Hutcheson Memorial Forest, New Jersey. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club. 88:156—-166. Moulding, J. D. 1977. The progression of a gypsy moth invasion of a mature oak forest in New Jersey. Wm. L. Hutcheson Memorial Forest Bull. 4:5-11. Muller, J. 1965. Supplemental list of Macrolepidoptera of New Jersey. J. NY Entomol. Soc. 73:63-77. ——. 1968. Additions to the supplemental list of New Jersey Macrolepidoptera. J. NY Entomol. Soc. 76:303-306. —. 1973. Second addition to the supplemental list of Macrolepidoptera of New Jersey. J. NY Entomol. Soc. 81:66—71. . 1976. Third addition to the supplemental list of Macrolepidoptera of New Jersey. J. NY Entomol. Soc. 84:197—200. Preston, F. W. 1948. The commoness and rarity of species. Ecol. 29:254-283. Sargent, T. D. 1976. Legion of Night: The underwing moths. Univ. Mass. Press, Amherst, Mass. Smith, J. B. 1910. Report of New Jersey State Museum for 1909. Trenton. Williams, C. B. 1939. An analysis of four years’ captures of insects in a light trap. Roy. Ent. Soc. London Trans. 89:79-132. PROC. ENTOMOL. SOC. WASH. 81(1), 1979, p. 145-150 SociETY MEETINGS 85ist Regular Meeting—May 4, 1978 The 85Ist Regular Meeting of the Entomological Society of Washington was called to order by President Sutherland at 8:00 pm on May 4, 1978, in the Ecology Theater of the National Museum of Natural History. Twenty- two members and 7 guests were present. The minutes of the April meeting were read and approved. Membership chairman Utmar read for the first time the names of the following new applicants for membership: James F. Matta, Department of Biological Sciences, Old Dominion Uni- versity, Norfolk, Virginia. Loren Russell, Department of Entomology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon. President Sutherland announced that our editor, Manya Stoetzel, would attend the meeting of the Council of Biological Editors, to be held in To- ronto, Canada. Program chairman Adler asked the Society for suggestions for speakers, particularly for the October meeting. President-elect Davis passed out announcements for the Annual Banquet and encouraged the membership to purchase tickets as soon as possible. William Bickley re- minded the Society of the banquet of the Washington Academy of Sciences. Richard Foote, a member of our Society, will be their speaker. President Sutherland introduced the principal speaker for the evening, Dr. J. C. M. Jonkman, Attache for Health and Environmental Protection, Royal Netherlands Embassy. Dr. Jonkman spoke on the biology and ecol- ogy of the leaf-cutting ant Atta vollenweideri and its impact in Paraguayan pastures. The talk was well illustrated with kodachrome slides and was followed by a question and answer period. NOTES AND EXHIBITIONS Manya Stoetzel circulated a recent publication entitled *‘Aphids on Jug- landaceae in North America’’ that was written by Ted Bissell of our Society. The meeting adjourned at 10:05 pm, after which punch and cookies were served. Wayne N. Mathis, Recording Secretary 852nd Regular Meeting—June 1, 1978 The Entomological Society of Washington and Insecticide Society of Washington Joint Annual Banquet was held on June 1, 1978, at the Fort McNair Officers’ Club, Washington, D.C. Dale Parish was host, Don R. 146 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON Davis and Jack Plimmer were the banquet chairmen, and Victor Adler was the Master of Ceremonies. After the social hour and dinner, Dr. and Mrs. Oliver S. Flint, Jr. and Dr. Wayne N. Mathis spoke on ‘‘Expedicion a Chile.’’ Afterwards, Jack Plimmer conducted the drawing for door prizes, of which there were many. Mrs. Floyd E. Smith planned and made the floral arrangements. Approximately 115 members and guests attended. Wayne N. Mathis, Recording Secretary 853rd Regular Meeting—October 5, 1978 The 853rd Regular Meeting of the Entomological Society of Washington was called to order by President Sutherland at 8:05 pm on October 5, 1978, in the Ecology Theater of the National Museum of Natural History. Thirty members and 10 guests were present. The minutes of the May and June meetings were read and approved. Memberships chairman Utmar read for the first time the names of the following new applicants for membership: Jeffrey K. Barnes, Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ith- aca, New York. Lynda D. Corkum, Department of Zoology, University of Alberta, Ed- monton, Alberta, Canada. Raymond D. Eikenbary, Entomology Department, Oklahoma State Uni- versity, Stillwater, Oklahoma. J. D. Moulding, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville, Florida. Donald R. Perry, 247 Bicknell Apt. C, Santa Monica, California. Barbara L. Peterson, Department of Entomology, University of Mary- land, College Park, Maryland. Richard G. Robbins, Department of Entomology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. John E. Rawlins, Department of Entomology, Comstock Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York. Owen D. V. Sholes, Division of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, As- sumption College, Worcester, Massachusetts. James F. Stimmel, Bureau of Plant Industry, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Stephen J. Taft, Department of Biology, University of Wisconsin, Stevens Point, Wisconsin. G. W. Wolfe, Department of Zoology, University of Tennessee, Knox- ville, Tennessee. President Sutherland announced that the Executive Committee had re- | cently met and had reviewed and approved the amendments proposed to | the Society’s bylaws as submitted and explained by the bylaws committee. VOLUME 81, NUMBER 1 147 President Sutherland then asked Chris Thompson of the bylaws committee to briefly explain the need for the changes and what the changes are. A handout was given to all in attendance to further explain the proposed changes. At the November meeting, there will be a vote of the membership regarding these changes. Program chairman Adler requested suggestions from the Society for speakers at future meetings. President Sutherland announced that Don Anderson, Dale Parrish, and Oliver S. Flint, Jr., have been asked to serve on the auditing committee and that Terry Erwin and John Kingsolver have been asked to serve on the nominating committee. The principal speaker for the evening was Dr. Edward M. Barrows, De- partment of Biology, Georgetown University. Dr. Barrows spoke on the mating behavior of bees and wasps. Several kodachrome slides illustrated his talk and an interesting question and answer period followed. NOTES AND EXHIBITIONS J. H. Fales reported taking the European Skipper, Thymelicus lineola (Ochsenheimer) in Rock Creek Park, Washington, D.C., on June 10, 1978. This is the first record of this species in the District. A. B. Gurney exhibited a new book, compiled by Pamela Gilbert and published by the British Mu- seum, ‘A compendium of the biographical literature on deceased entomol- ogists,’ 1977. He also discussed briefly Serie II, 1864-1900, of Index Lit- teraturae Entomologicae, 5 volumes, published 1963—1975 in Berlin, which is a continuation of the well known work published under the leadership of Walther Horn, 1928-29. President Sutherland announced that Carl F. W. Muesebeck of our So- ciety was recently presented with the L. O. Howard award at the Eastern Branch Meetings of the Entomological Society of America in New York. Dee Houston announced that an international pollination symposium will be held at the University of Maryland, October 11-13. Following the introduction of guests, President Sutherland adjourned the meeting, after which punch and cookies were served. Wayne N. Mathis, Recording Secretary 854th Regular Meeting—November 2, 1978 The 854th Regular Meeting of the Entomological Society of Washington was called to order by President Sutherland at 8:00 pm on November 2, 1978, in the Ecology Theater of the National Museum of Natural History. Twenty-seven members and 18 guests were present. The minutes of the October meeting were read, corrected, and approved. 148 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON Membership chairman Utmar read for the first time the names of the following new applicants for membership: Ibrahim J. Al Gboory, Baghdad University, Abu-Ghraib, Iraq. Thomas Richard Beck, 12607 Cedarbrook Lane, Laurel, Maryland. Mignon M. Davis, Department of Entomology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Paul H. Freytag, Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky. Hans J. Hannemann, Zoologisches Museum, Humboldt University, Ber- lin, DDR, East Germany. Carl H. Kaster, Department of Biology, University of Louisville, Louis- ville, Kentucky. James L. Skaptason, 11164 Forest Edge Dr., Reston, Virginia. Rebecca F. Surdick, Department of Biology, ey of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah. John Trumble, Department of Biology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute State University, Blacksburg, Virginia. T. R. White, Department of Entomology and Economic Zoology, Clem- son University, Clemson, South Carolina. President Sutherland announced that the third member of the nominating committee is John Davidson. President Sutherland asked Chris Thompson, chairman of the bylaws committee, to again explain why the bylaws committee was convened and their proposed amendments, which were presented and passed by the executive committee for presentation to the general membership at a regular meeting. Ray Gagne moved that the amendments to the bylaws be accepted unanimously. Three objections to the wording of the proposed amendments were raised by George Steyskal and explained by Chris. These were discus- sed. The motion was seconded and passed by a three-fourths majority. John Kingsolver, member of the nominating committee, announced their slate of nominees for 1979. They are: President-elect Theodore J. Spilman Recording Secretary Wayne N. Mathis Corresponding Secretary Mignon B. Davis Treasurer F. Christian Thompson Program Chairman Michael Faran Membership Chairwoman Joyce A. Utmar Editor Manya B. Stoetzel Custodian Sueo Nakahara President Sutherland introduced the principal speakers for the evening, | Dr. John Davidson, Department of Entomology, University of Maryland; VOLUME 81, NUMBER 1 149 and Mr. Stan Gill, Extention Agent, Montgomery Co. They spoke on inte- grated pest management of urban ornamental plants and presented numer- ous kodachrome slides to illustrate their talk. NOTES AND EXHIBITIONS Mignon Davis passed around a new book entitled **Magnificent Fora- gers,’ which is a photo-written account of the field activities of the scientists at the National Museum of Natural History. Maynard Ramsay showed a new edition of Fundamentals of Applied En- tomology, Robert Pfadt editor. Manya Stoetzel exhibited a new book entitled *‘Whitefly of the world, a systematic catalogue of the Aleyrodidae (Homoptera) with host plant and natural enemy data’ by L. A. Mound and S. H. Halsey, British Museum (Natural History), London. 1978. [John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., England 13.50. ] John Kingsolver announced that Herb Ross had died (2 Nov.) and gave a brief biography of his life. Following the introduction of many guests, the meeting was adjourned at 9:40 pm. Wayne N. Mathis, Recording Secretary 855th Regular Meeting—December 7, 1978 The 855th Regular Meeting of the Entomological Society of Washington was called to order by President Sutherland at 8:00 pm on December 7, 1978, in the Ecology Theater of the National Museum of Natural History. Forty members and 28 guests were present. The minutes of the November meeting were read and approved. Membership chairman Utmar read for the first time the names of the following new applicants for membership: Rick Borchelt, Department of Entomology, University of Maryland, Col- lege Park, Maryland. Mark A. Deyrup, Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana. Deborah R. McGann, 5497 Lighthouse Lane, Lake Braddock, Burke, Virginia. O. P. Negrobov, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Voronesh University, Voronesh, USSR. President Sutherland reported that the Society had completed the year in good condition and asked the membership chairman, editor, and treasurer to give their reports, which they did. Summary reports will be published in the April issue of the Proceedings. 150 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON President Sutherland then presented the slate of nominees for the Soci- ety’s elected offices as announced previously. They are: President-elect Theodore J. Spilman Recording Secretary Wayne N. Mathis Corresponding Secretary Mignon B. Davis Treasurer F. Christian Thompson Program Chairman Michael Faran Membership Chairwoman Joyce A. Utmar Editor Manya B. Stoetzel Custodian Sueo Nakahara It was moved and seconded that the slate be adopted as presented. The motion passed unanimously. President Sutherland also announced that Helen Sollers-Riedel has again agreed to be hospitality chairwoman for the coming year. On behalf of the Society, President Sutherland presented an engraved bowl to Mrs. Floyd Smith in appreciation for years of service to the Society in making floral displays for the annual banquets. | The principal speaker for the evening was Dr. Don Davis, Department of | Entomology, Smithsonian Institution. Dr. Davis spoke on African entomol- ogy, °‘A Trip Report.’’ His talk was illustrated by numerous kodachrome slides of insects, other wildlife, and the terrain. The excellence of the slides is in part a credit to Mignon Davis. Dr. Davis also brought along a drawer of insects collected on the trip and a vial of Polypedilum vanderplanki Hinton, the indestructable chironomid fly. NOTES AND EXHIBITIONS John Kingsolver showed the first fascicle of the North American Coleop- tera Catalog. John explained how the information can be updated and said that the catalog will be completed during the next 10 years. Don Davis announced that Doris Blake, a longtime member of the Soci- ety, had passed away on December 3rd. Doris worked on the taxonomy of chrysomelid beetles and had been associated with the museum for over 40 years. T. J. Spilman showed the 43rd edition of The Naturalists’ Directory and Almanac (International), compiled and edited by Ross H. Arnett, Jr. T. J. Spilman reported the death of Henry Dietrich of Cornell University on November 8th and the hospitalization and recovery of Curtis Sabrosky and Ashley Gurney. | Following the introduction of many guests, President Sutherland turned the gavel over to Don Davis who adjourned the meeting. | Punch and cookies were served afterward. Wayne N. Mathis, Recording Secretary VOLUME 81, NUMBER | 151 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY (ICSEB-II) The Second International Congress of Systematic and Evolutionary Bi- ology (ICSEB-II) will be held at The University of British Columbia, Van- couver, Canada, 17—24 July 1980. OMAN NHAUNABWN — The provisional list of symposia topics include: . Arctic refugia and the evolution of Arctic biota . Origins and evolution of the North Pacific marine biota . Evolution of reproductive strategies . Evolutionary epigenetics . Evolution of community structure . Green algae and land plant origins . Macromolecular mechanisms in evolution . Allozymes and evolution . Coevolution and foraging strategy . Evolution of colonizing species . Rare species and the maintenance of gene pools . Paleobiology of the pacific rim Additional symposia may be included. Sessions for contributed papers and for papers in specialized fields, taxo- nomic as well as methodological, will also be organized. Those interested in receiving an information circular in the spring of 1979, should write to the following: Dr. G. G. E. Scudder Department of Zoology The University of British Columbia 2075 Wesbrook Mall Vancouver, B.C. V6T 1W5 Canada. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE STATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP, MANAGEMENT AND CIRCULATION (Required by 39 U.S.C. 3685) 1, TITLE OF PUBLICATION 2. DATE OF FILING | Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Wash. 4} 4| 5] 6] 4] 0| 25 Sept 1978 3. FREQUENCY OF ISSUE A. NO. OF ISSUES PUBLISHED| B. ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION ANNUALLY 4 PRICE $8 members July, October) _ 4. LOCATION OF KNOWN OFFICE OF PUBLICATION (Street, City, County, State and ZIP Code) (Not printers) ¥ c/o Dept. Entomology, Smithsonian Institution, Wash., D.C. 20560 $17 LG tig 5. LOCATION OF THE HEADQUARTERS OR GENERAL BUSINESS OFFICES OF THE PUBLISHERS (Not printers) OTl=membve cromes— Same_as #4 6. NAMES AND COMPLETE ADDRESSES OF PUBLISHER, EDITOR, AND MANAGING EDITOR PUBLISHER (Name and Address) Entomological Society of Washington, address as in #4 EDITOR (Name and Address) Manya Brooke Stoetzel, address as in #4 MANAGING EDITOR (Name and Address) 7. OWNER (If owned by a corporation, its name and address must be stated and also immediately thereunder the names and addresses of stock- holders owning or holding I percent or more of total amount of stock. If not owned by a corporation, the names and addresses of the individual owners must be given. If owned by a partnership or other unincorporated firm, its name and address, as well as that of each individual must be given.) NAME ADDRESS | Entomological Society of Washington c/o Dept. Entomology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560 L 8. KNOWN BONDHOLDERS, MORTGAGEES, AND OTHER SECURITY HOLDERS OWNING OR HOLDING 1 PERCENT OR MORE OF TOTAL AMOUNT OF BONDS, MORTGAGES OR OTHER SECURITIES (If there are none, so state) T NAME \ ADDRESS if None L 9. FOR COMPLETION BY NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS AUTHORIZED TO MAIL AT SPECIAL RATES (Section 132.122, PSM) The purpose, function, and nonprofit status of this organization and the exempt status for Federal income tax purposes (Check one) HAVE NOT CHANGED DURING HAVE CHANGED DURING (If changed, publisher must submit explanation of change PRECEDING 12 MONTHS PRECEDING 12 MONTHS with this statement.) AVERAGE NO. COPIES EACH ACTUAL NO. COPIES OF SINGLE 10. EXTENT AND NATURE OF CIRCULATION ISSUE DURING PRECEDING ISSUE PUBLISHED NEAREST TO 12 MONTHS le FILING DATE A. TOTAL NO, COPIES PRINTED (Net Press Run) 950 950 B. PAID CIRCULATION T 1, SALES THROUGH DEALERS AND CARRIERS, STREET VENDORS AND COUNTER SALES 0 0 “ + 2. MAIL SUBSCRIPTIONS | 843 856 Cc. TOTAL PAID CIRCULATION (Sum of 10B1 and 10B2) 843 856 D. FREE DISTRIBUTION BY MAIL, CARRIER OR OTHER MEANS SAMPLES, COMPLIMENTARY, AND OTHER FREE COPIES 5 5 —_——_{ E. TOTAL DISTRIBUTION (Sum of C and D) | 848 861 F, COPIES NOT DISTRIBUTED 1, OFFICE USE, LEFT OVER, UNACCOUNTED, SPOILED 102 89 AFTER PRINTING 2. RETURNS FROM NEWS AGENTS 0 0 -: = G. TOTAL (Sum of E, F1 and 2—should equal net press run shown in A) I certify that the statements made by me above are correct and complete. 12. FOR COMPLETION BY PUBLISHERS MAILING AT THE REGULAR RATEY fSection 132.121, Postal Service Mafyual) 39 U.S. C, 3626 provides in pertinent part: ‘‘No person who would have been entitled to mail matter under former section 4359 of this title shall mall such matter at the rates provided under this subsection unless he files annually with the Postal Service a written request for permission to mail matter at such rates.”’ In accordance with the provisions of this statute, | hereby request permission to mail the publication named In Item 1 at the phased postage rates presently authorized by 39 U.S SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF EDI { ation 3526 (Page 1) (See instructions on reverse) PUBLICATIONS FOR SALE BY THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS Cynipid Galls of the Eastern United States, by Lewis H. Weld __---------------- Seoipid Galls of the Southwest, by Lewis H. Weld. ..—_-__.- ._.-_-_---__---_-___. Bothypapers;onicymipidugalls 2 .t ees eee aoe seen eee eee Mee eee Identification of Alaskan Black Fly Larvae, by Kathryn M. Sommerman _____- Unusual Scalp Dermatitis in Humans Caused by the Mite Dermatophagoides, Bypass ay cles eee ates nan © ween eee ee lees eae eeeeew ee ees a8 ee A Short History of the Entomological Society of Washington, by Ashley B. (CREPE lA alias en ge ee ee Ee Pictorial Key to Species of the Genus Anastrepha (Diptera: Tephritidae), by (Geonced@nsley Skalmai.s seen: oes snowy ale Po hie feeb see be ual oy No. No. MEMOIRS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON . The North American Bees of the Genus Osmia, by Grace Sandhouse. NE) etait SS Be ea ee . The Nearctic Leafhoppers, a Generic Classification and Check List, by PAU Wal Som © mean G4 eee Ce ee ee ee . A Manual of the Chiggers, by G. W. Wharton and H. S. Fuller. 1952 . A Classification of the Siphonaptera of South America, by Phyllis T. TighnsSon ewe Oo. maces ce hee See ten ee a . The Female Tabanidae of Japan, Korea and Manchuria, by Wallace P. Murdoch andi birosi Takahast.. 969)... __._-_-__-._----- _-- 2. . Ant Larvae: Review and Synthesis, by George C. Wheeler and Jeanette WTEC LENO One tees Nae elan eee sere Nabe So £5 ON! Dyke oa eR Se 1.50 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 Back issues of the Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington are available at $15.00 per volume to non-members and $9 per volume to members of the Society. Prices quoted are U.S. currency. Dealers are allowed a discount of 10 per cent on all items, including annual subscriptions, that are paid in advance. All orders should be placed with the Custodian, Entomological Society of Washington, c/o Department of Entomology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560. CONTENTS (Continued from front cover) KNUTSON, L. and O. S. FLINT, JR.—Do dance flies feed on caddisflies?—Further evidence (Diptera: Empididaes inchopteta) 2s. 7 asses eee MENKE, A. S. and R. M. BOHART.—Sphecid wasps of the world: Errors and omis- sions: (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae)i % osais ncten ahtniel s eetc eer nclaieia ela ces ave ag tee MORIHARA, D. K. and W. P. MCCAFFERTY.—Subspecies of the transatlantic spe- cies. Baetismacani. (Ephemeroptera:, bactidae)) ori ec eite ei ioe retro MOULDING, J. D. and J. J. MADENJIAN.—Macrolepidopteran moths light-trapped in a Néw: Jersey oak forest (Lepidoptera)! ieee en oe es oe ee see ee NUHN, T. P. and C. G. VAN DYKE.—Laboulbenia formicarum Thaxter (Ascomy- cotina: Laboulbeniales) on ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Raleigh, North Caro- lina with a new: host record’. .ncacs dsams cohen ew oe om ee eis waives Ake eee PARKER, C. R. and J. R. VOSHELL, JR.—A new species of Hydroptila from Virginia (irichoptera: Hydroptilidae), ..a9.-6 sie ore eee i eee ae ANNOUNCEMENT: Second International Congress of Systematic and Evolutionary Biology (ESB BID ej cdi anvennade cy. es reese Seen tees ieee crs nee eee APRIL 1979 NO©..2 $, 70673 _ PROCEEDINGS of the TOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY of WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ENTOMOLOGY SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20560 PUBLISHED QUARTERLY CONTENTS /AARNES, J. K.—The taxonomic position of the New Zealand genus Prosochaeta Mal- SEPA teha ty SCLOMYZIGAE) ec cia eects repsiots eae ne Sy chs oe abale alley esac Hg erg yavel a bdson tyes whejsleseteie 285 LARK, W. E.—Taxonomy and biogeography of weevils of the genus Sibinia Germar _ (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) associated with Prosopis (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae) “11 QNTREETTIUUITTE Re Pet ea nS ee eau eees karen: eed eae car ae ie eA el ee 153 OSCARON, S., G. B. FAIRCHILD, and C. B. PHILIP.—Rediscovery of both sexes of the enigmatic Zophina ciseni (Townsend) (Diptera: Tabanidae) in Baja Califor- 3 ‘SUES 5 Sheree Sis aah ato. oa oo. ot oS ake he ane SR ae Cre caGie eer nena ene Sentra eres tr 248 ‘ELONG, D. M.—Studies of the Gyponinae with six new species of Polana (Homop- ioe (Chee IGEYe))) Salata Gee ae ORGS Oe OO SOI tae Seine rine Cora yaar an err preety 298 ‘VANS, H. E.—The genus Dissomphalus in northwestern South America (Hymenop- PoE ULV IAG) i pase clentts oi cy serine cecil ve sec torch ue eevee icnsi ciettles aucysiviedis cide scthers eye valle 276 TENRY, T. J. and A. G. WHEELER, JR.—Palearctic Miridae in North America: Records of newly discovered and little-known species (Hemiptera: Heteroptera).. 257 [UBBARD, M. D.—The type-species of the genus Leptophlebia Westwood (Ephemer- OT TTERER ILS yriiteye te oiGhYS)piamaseo eco aod cs peo Ae OC at Cen nos Orta od as ete 219 .EWIS, P. A.—A new species of the mayfly genus Stenonema Traver from eastern United States (Ephemeroptera: Heptageniidae)..................- 2. cece ee eee ees 321 IN, N.—Differential prey selection for the sex of offspring in the cicada killer Sphe- ABE CIOSUS (FAY MENOpteras: SPHECIGAE)! 61. fey. cael. wis anes sna noi eieie oc ns alo nlere s sie aye 269 (Continued on back cover) THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON ORGANIZED MARCH 12, 1884 OFFICERS FOR 1979 DONALD R. Davis, President HELEN SOLLERS-RIEDEL, Hospitality Chair T. J. SPILMAN, President-Elect MICHAEL FARAN, Program Cha WayYNE N. Maruis, Recording Secretary Joyce A. UTMAR, Membership Chair MIGNON B. Davis, Corresponding Secretary SUEO-NAKAHARA, Cus F. CHRISTIAN THOMPSON, Treasurer DONALD R. Davis, Delegate, Wash. Aca Manya B. STOETZEL, Editor Publications Committee Eric E. GRISSELL JOHN M. KINGSOLVER ASHLEY B. GURNEY Davib R. SMITH, Associate Editor GEORGE C. STEYSKAL Honorary President C. F. W. MUESEBECK Honorary Members FREDERICK W. Poos FRANK L. CAMPBELL RAYMOND A. St. GEO All correspondence concerning Society business should be mailed to the appropriate officer at the following address: Entom Society of Washington, c/o Department of Entomology. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560. MEETINGS. —Regular meetings of the Society are held in the Ecology Theater, Natural History Building, Smithsonian Instituti_ the first Thursday of each month from October to June, inclusive, at 8 P.M. Minutes of meetings are published regularly Proceedings. MEMBERSHIP.—Members shall be persons who have demonstrated interest in the science of entomology. Annual dues for m are $9.00 (U.S. currency) of which $8.00 is for a subscription to the Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington year. PROCEEDINGS.—Published quarterly beginning with January by the Society at Washington, D.C. Members in good standing r the Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington. Nonmember subscriptions are $15.00 per year, domestic, and $17. year, foreign (U.S. currency), payable in advance. All remittances should be made payable to The Entomological Society of ington. The Society does not exchange its publications for those of other societies. Please see inside back cover of any 1972-1975 issue for instructions regarding preparation of manuscripts. STATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP Title of Publication: Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington. Frequency of Issue: Quarterly (January, April, July, October). Location of Office of Publication, Business Office of Publisher and Owner: The Entomological Society of Washington, c/o Depar of Entomology. Smithsonian Institution, 10th and Constitution NW. Washington, D.C. 20560. Editor: Dr. Manya B. Stoetzel, Systematic Entomology Laboratory, BARC-W, Beltsville, Maryland 20705. Managing Editor and Known Bondholders or other Security Holders: none. This issue was mailed 26 June 1979 Second Class Postage Paid at Washington, D.C. and additional mailing office. PRINTED BY ALLEN PRESS, INC... LAWRENCE, KANSAS 66044, USA PROC. ENTOMOL. SOC. WASH. 81(2), 1979, pp. 153-170 TAXONOMY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY OF WEEVILS OF THE GENUS SIBINIA GERMAR (COLEOPTERA: CURCULIONIDAE) ASSOCIATED WITH PROSOPIS (LEGUMINOSAE: MIMOSOIDEAE) IN ARGENTINA WAYNE E. CLARK Department of Zoology-Entomology and Alabama Agricultural Experi- -ment Station, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36830. Abstract.—Five species in the sulcifera group of the genus Sibinia Ger- mar occur in the semiarid Monte and Chaco biotic provinces of Argentina and have hosts in the plant genus Prosopis (Leguminosae). Sibinia asulci- fera Clark, newly recorded from P. argentina, P. flexuosa, and P. torquata and §. concava Clark, now known from P. flexuosa, P. nigra, and P. alba, are confirmed as a seed-bud predator microsympatric pair. Three Argentine species, §. mastuerzo from P. strombulifera, S. tintitaco from P. torquata, and S§. algarobilla from P. seriacantha are newly described. A key to the Argentine sulcifera group members is presented, and the position of the new species in a modified version of a previously reconstructed sulcifera group phylogeny is discussed. Zoogeography of the group is considered in light of various hypotheses put forth to explain similarities in the floras of the disjunct arid regions of North and South America. The sulcifera group is apparently unusual among animals associated with plants in these areas in having closely related species in both regions. This paper is based on a study of 17 specimens of the weevil genus Sibinia sent to the United States National Museum of Natural History (USNM) for identification by Hugo Cordo of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The specimens were collected in western Argentina, in the Monte and Chaco phytogeographic provinces, as part of an effort to find agents for biological control of Prosopis. In view of the current interest in Prosopis as an im- portant component of New World desert ecosystems (Simpson, 1977) and Prosopis-associated insects, both from the standpoint of their natural his- tory and ecology (Kingsolver et al., 1977), and as potential biological control agents in North America (Ward et al., 1977), it is desirable to review what is known about Prosopis-associated species of Sibinia. Five species of Sibinia, all members of the sulcifera group of the sub- genus Microtychius, are represented in the series collected by Cordo. Two 154 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON of the species, S. asulcifera Clark and S. concava Clark, have been de- scribed (Clark, 1978). The other three are described for the first time herein. The specimens were collected on six different species of Prosopis: P. ar- gentina Burkart, P. flexuosa de Candolle, P. nigra (Grisebach) Hierony- mus, and P. seriacantha Hooker and Arnott of the section Algarobia, and P. strombulifera (Lamarck) Bentham, and P. torquata (Lagasca) de Can- dolle of the section Strombocarpa. Although direct information on the life histories of these species of Sibinia is not available, it is possible to infer the probable site of larval development of each. The host plants of all of the 127 previously described members of the subgenus Microtychius are known to be, or are suspected to be, mi- mosoid legumes (Clark, 1978). Larvae of some species of Microtychius de- velop in seeds of these plants (seed predators), whereas larvae of others develop in the flower buds (bud predators). Adults of the seed predators are generally easily distinguished from adults of bud predators by their larger size, more prominent structural features, and frequently more distinctive scale patterns. Thus, although the larval developmental site of only one sulcifera group member, the bud predator S. setosa (LeConte) is known (see Rogers et al., 1975), it is inferred that the su/cifera group contains both bud and seed predators. Another important characteristic of species of Microtychius is the fre- quent synchronous occurrence of individuals of two or more species on the same plant. I refer to this situation as ‘“‘microsympatry,’’ distinguished from ‘‘sympatry,’ or the occurrence of individuals of different species of Micro- tychius at a given locality on different plant species. In Microtychius it is common for individuals of a seed predator to be microsympatric with in- dividuals of one, or sometimes two or more, bud predators. The members of these microsympatric bud-seed predator pairs frequently belong to the same species group, and appear to be limited to one or a few closely related host plant species. These attributes appear to characterize the sulcifera group. With this as background, it is possible to discuss the sulcifera group in greater detail. The species descriptions and line drawings were prepared using techniques described previously (Clark, 1978). All 17 of the specimens received from Cordo are deposited in the USNM collection. In addition to locality and host labels, each of the specimens bears a label, presumably affixed by the collector, with a unique combination of numbers and letters. The specimens are referred to by this combination at certain places in the text. THE SULCIFERA GROUP Members of the sulcifera group have the following diagnostic features (modified from Clark, 1978:128): Eyes relatively small, flattened, hind mar-/ VOLUME 81, NUMBER 2 155 gins not raised; frons distinctly wider than rostrum at base; vertex of head, rostrum, pronotum, elytra, and femora with large, round to subquadrate, imbricated scales which are strongly concave in most species, and with elongate, narrow scales which are erect and acuminate in some species (absent from the pronotum in some). Four of the nine species in the su/cifera group are North American. These are §. transversa (Casey) of the southwestern United States, and $. cuauh- temoc Clark of southern Mexico, both on Acacia; S. setosa (LeConte) of the southwestern United States, Mexico, and the West Indies, on Prosopis (see Rogers et al., 1975; Clark, 1978:135-137, 140-141), and S. sulcifera, presumably of Mexico, but known only from specimens intercepted in quar- antine at the U.S.-Mexico border, on unknown host(s). The remaining five species are known only from Argentina. These are S$. asulcifera, S. con- cava, and three species described herein on Prosopis. The North American sulcifera group members are distinguished from each other by the characters in the key to North and Central American Sibinia (Clark, 1978). Three of the Argentine species, §. asulcifera, S. tin- titaco, and S. mastuerzo, trace to S. asulcifera in the key to South Amer- ican Sibinia (Clark, 1978). The other two Argentine species, S. concava and S§. algarobilla, trace to S. concava in the same key. The Argentine species are distinguished from each other in the following key: KEY TO SPECIES OF THE SIBINIA SULCIFERA GROUP FROM ARGENTINA 1. Round to subquadrate recumbent scales biseriate on all elytral in- terspaces; pronotum without elongate narrow scales; narrow scales, if present on elytra, short, recumbent, or raised only slightly on CSC TEES BS eee SO Re ST OPER ote erate EG CR er 2 — Round to subquadrate recumbent scales uniseriate on major portions of even-numbered elytral interspaces; pronotum and elytra with prominent, narrow, attenuate, erect bristlelike scales (Figs. 1-2, 5- CeO rt hee gy aie aye gs 5 2. oie a: coal hn Sa viavie Bons Sh alin hh wad PR RRR 4 2. Distal portion of rostrum more or less cylindrical (Figs. 1, 3, 5, 7)... 3 Distal portion of rostrum acuminate (Fig. 9) .. S. tintitaco, new species 3. Recumbent scales on pronotum and elytra not or only feebly con- cave; rostrum nearly straight (Fig. 7); sternum 5 of female abdomen strongly constricted, posteromedian portion distinctly produced ... Pet stes cecrvicieys state LES Gs bepdie ce 4 he S. mastuerzo, new species — Recumbent scales on pronotum and elytra distinctly concave; ros- trum curved (Fig. 3); sternum 5 of female abdomen only feebly con- stricted, posteromedian portion not produced ..... S. asulcifera Clark 4. Round to subquadrate recumbent scales uniseriate on even-num- bered elytral interspaces; even interspaces devoid of bristlelike SOAS Gr OR REIOR Rene RCE Or ee mI eee rence S. concava Clark 156 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON Ces : 10 Figs. 1-10. Sibinia spp., habitus. (1) S. algarobilla, female, holotype, lateral view; (2) the same, dorsal view; (3) S. asulcifera, female, paratype, Andalgala, Catamarca, Argentina, lat- eral view; (4) the same, dorsal view; (5) S$. concava, female, paratype, Andalgala, Catamarca, Argentina, lateral view; (6) the same, dorsal view; (7) S. mastuerzo, female, holotype, lateral view; (8) the same, dorsal view; (9) S. tintitaco, female, holotype, lateral view; (10) the same, dorsal view. VOLUME 81, NUMBER 2 157 — Round to subquadrate recumbent scales uniseriate on elytral inter- space 4 and on basal portions of interspaces 6 and 8, biseriate on odd-numbered interspaces and on remainder of even-numbered in- terspaces; even-numbered interspaces with prominent, erect bristle- like sSCales Pree tee Sats Se el ee S. algarobilla, new species Sibinia (Microtychius) asulcifera Clark Figs. 3, 4 Sibinia (Microtychius) asulcifera Clark, 1978:129. Holotype, 6, 50 km W Andalgala, Catamarca, Argentina (USNM). Diagnosis.—Distal portion of rostrum cylindrical (Fig. 3); concave recum- bent scales biseriate on odd- and even-numbered elytral interspaces; odd- numbered elytral interspaces with median row of short, narrow, recumbent scales, these dense and conspicuous on declivities; pronotum without nar- row scales. Description.—See Clark, 1978:129. Discussion.—This relatively large Microtychius is probably a seed pred- ator. Although members of the type-series were collected on non-mimosoid plants (Cassia and Zuccagnia; Leguminosae, subfamily Caesalpinioideae), it was predicted (Clark, 1978:135) that the weevil would have a Prosopis host(s) because of its close resemblance to the Prosopis-associated bud predator S. concava. The receipt of three S. asulcifera specimens collected on Prosopis confirms that prediction. Furthermore, the fact that one spec- imen of S. asulcifera (D-457b) and a specimen of §. concava (D-457a) bear identical label data is evidence that the two species may, as was also pre- dicted, occur in microsympatry. Another specimen of S$. asulcifera (D-543) appears to have been taken in microsympatry with the bud predator S. tintitaco (D-545a, D-545b). The Prosopis spp. on which the S. asulcifera specimens were collected belong to two of the six generic sections recog- nized by Burkart (1940), Algarobia and Strombocarpa. The specimens received from Cordo were taken in San Juan Province, at localities and on dates and hosts as follows (see Fig. 22): D-457b. Rt. 40, 39 mi N San Juan City, 26 November 1976, sweeping Prosopis flexuosa. D-509. Rt. 40, 51 mi N San Juan City, 26 November 1976, sweeping Prosopis argentina. D-543. Rt. 40, 10 mi N Jachal, 27 November 1976, sweeping Prosopis torquata. Sibinia (Microtychius) mastuerzo Clark, NEW SPECIES Bigs deo, L250 15 Holotype.—?, Argentina: Mendoza Province, Rt. 40, 10 mi N Mendoza City, 24 November 1976, sweeping Prosopis strombulifera, D-377a. (USNM Type no. 75852). | 158 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON Paratype.—Same label data as holotype (1 2, D-377b). Diagnosis.—Rostrum of female nearly straight, distal portion cylindrica (Fig. 7); recumbent scales on elytral interspaces flat or feebly concave uniformly biseriate; odd-numbered interspaces with median row of short stout, apically blunt scales which are recumbent on dorsum, erect, but in- conspicuous on declivites. Description.—Length: 1.86—-2.08 mm. Width: 0.92-1.06 mm. Eye: Height about 1.5 x length. Frons: Rounded continuously with head (Fig. 7); scales on sides forming low superocular tuft. Rostrum: 0.88—-0.94 x pronotal length; in dorsal view tapered slightly to antennal insertions, subparallel sided to tip; in dorsal profile broadly curved at base, nearly straight from just distad of base to tip; distal portion long, 55-59% of total rostral length, slender, glabrous, smooth. Prothorax: Pronotum and pleuron with round to subquadrate recumbent scales only, these not or only slightly con- cave; white, fulvoferruginous, and ferruginous scales present, white scales forming incomplete, posteriorly-widened dorsomedian vitta, ferruginous scales forming broad lateromedian vittae, posterolateral portions and pleu- ron with white scales and ferruginous or fulvoferruginous scales intermixed Elytra: Interspaces subequal in width; round to subquadrate recumbeni scales not or only feebly concave, broadly imbricated; short, recumbent narrow scales forming irregular mediobasal macula and sutural vitta, inter- mixed among fulvoferruginous or ferruginous scales on remainder, espe- cially dense laterally and on declivities. Abdomen: Median portion of sternzé 1-5 feebly convex, sternum 5 strongly constricted subapically, posterome- dian portion of segment slightly produced and distinctly flexed downward Spiculum ventrale: See Fig. 12. Spermatheca: See Fig. 15. Discussion.—Roughly comparable to S$. asulcifera in size, S. mastuerzc is probably, like that species a seed predator. Its host is Prosopis strom- bulifera. Etymology.—The name mastuerzo, a Spanish vernacular name of the host (Rowell, 1969), is also generally applied to South American member: of the section Strombocarpa (commonly known as “‘screwbeans”’ in Nortl America (Burkart and Simpson, 1977)). The masculine noun stands in ap- position to the feminine generic name. Figs. 11-18. Sibinia spp., external genitalia. (11) S. algarobilla, paratype, D-690a, spiculum ventrale; (12) S. mastuerzo, paratype, D-377b, spiculum ventrale; (13) S. tintitaco, paratype, D-545b, spiculum ventrale; (14) S$. algarobilla, paratype, D-690a, spermatheca; (15) S. mas- tuerzo, paratype, D-377b, spermatheca; (16) S. tintitaco, paratype, D-545b, spermatheca; (17) S. algarobilla, paratype, D-690b, median lobe of male genitalia, ventral view; (18) S. tintitaco, paratype D-640b, median lobe of male genitalia, ventral view. 159 NUMBER 2 VOLUME 81, 160 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON Sibinia (Microtychius) tintitaco Clark, NEW SPECIES Figs. 9% 10-13, 16; 185.20 Holotype. —@, Argentina: San Juan Province, Rt. 40, 10 mi W Jachal, 20 November 1976, sweeping Prosopis torquata, D-545a (USNM Type no. 75851). Paratypes.—Argentina: La Rioja Province, Rt. 40, 20 mi NE Pangancillo, 20 November 1976, sweeping Prosopis torquata (1 2, D-640a; 1 d, D-640b); same label data as holotype (1 2, D-545b). Diagnosis.—Distal portion of rostrum acuminate (Fig. 9); recumbent scales biseriate on each elytral interspace; odd-numbered interspaces with median row of short, narrow scales which are feebly raised on declivities; pronotum without such scales. Description.—Length: 3, 1.56 mm; @, 1.78-1.82 mm. Width: 3, 0.78 mm; 2, 0.94-0.96 mm. Eye: Height about 1.6 x length. Frons: In profile rounded continuously with head; erect scales on sides forming a low but distinct superocular tuft. Rostrum: 3, 0.81x, 2, 0.82-0.93 x pronotal length; in dorsal view strongly tapered to antennal insertions, finely acu- minate distally, especially in 2; in dorsal profile, broadly rounded at base, broadly, evenly curved from just distad of base to tip; distal portion in ¢ short, 52% of total rostral length, stout; in lateral view tapered, lateral sulcus obsolete; in 2, distal portion longer, 58-61% of total rostral length, smooth, shining. Prothorax: Pronotum with round, concave, imbricated scales only; white scales present in incomplete, posteriorly-widened dorsomedian vitta which is bounded on each side by broad, irregular vittae of ferruginous scales, the latter darkest on posterior portion; lateral portions of dorsum and pleuron with fulvous and paler whitish scales admixed. Elytra: Inter- spaces subequal in width; recumbent scales on interspaces round to subquadrate, concave, broadly imbricated, biseriate; white, fulvous, and darker ferruginous scales present in irregular pattern; white scales forming broad anteromedian macula and narrower posteromedian macula (Fig. 20); maculae separated by irregular transverse band of ferruginous scales; fer- ruginous and fulvous scales also variably intermixed mediobasally, else- where fulvous and whitish scales intermixed. Abdomen: In 6, sterna 1-4 shallowly, broadly concave medially, sternum 5 more deeply impressed, but not foveate medially; in 2, subapical constriction of sternum 5 distinct but posteromedian portion of segment not produced. Median lobe: See Fig. 18. Spiculum ventrale: See Fig. 13. Spermatheca: See Fig. 16. Discussion.—This relatively small Microtychius is probably a bud pred- ator of Prosopis torquata. It apparently occurs in microsympatry with the seed predator S. asulcifera, at least at the type-locality. The only significant variation noted in the small series examined is in the relative proportion of light fulvous and whitish scales and darker ferruginous scales on the pronotum and elytra. VOLUME 81, NUMBER 2 161] | Figs. 19-20. Sibinia spp., habitus. (19) S. concava, paratype, female, Andalgala, Cata- marca, Argentina, dorsal view; (20) S. tintitaco, female, holotype, dorsal view. Etymology.—The name fintitaco, a Spanish vernacular name of P. tor- quata (Rowell, 1969; Burkart and Simpson, 1977), is a masculine noun standing in apposition to the feminine generic name. Sibinia (Microtychius) concava Clark Figs. 5, 6, 19 | Sibinia (Microtychius) concava Clark, 1978:135. Holotype, °, 11 km W Las Cejas, Tucuman, Argentina (C. W. O’Brien collection). 162 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON Diagnosis.—Distal portion of rostrum cylindrical (Fig. 5); concave recum- bent scales biseriate on odd-numbered elytral interspaces, uniseriate on even-numbered interspaces; pronotum and odd-numbered elytral inter- spaces with prominent, acuminate, erect bristlelike scales, even-numbered interspaces devoid of such scales. Description.—See Clark, 1978:135. Discussion.—This relatively small Microtychius is probably a bud pred- ator. One of the paratypes (from Las Termas, Santiago del Estero Province, Argentina) was collected on Prosopis alba Grisebach. Cordo’s specimens were taken on two species of Prosopis (listed below), both of them, like P. alba, members of the section Algarobia. The apparent microsympatry of S. concava and the seed predator S. asulcifera on P. flexuosa is discussed in the section dealing with S. asulcifera. The specimens received from Cordo were collected at the localities on dates and plants as follows (see Fig. 22): D-226. San Luis Province, Rt. 7, 4 mi W San Luis City, 20 November 1976, sweeping Prosopis nigra. D-369. Mendoza Province, Rt. 40, 10 mi S Mendoza—San Juan border, 24 Novem- ber 1976, sweeping Prosopis flexuosa. D-457a. San Juan Province, Rt. 40, 39 mi N San Juan City, 26 November 1976, sweeping Prosopis flexuosa. D-675. La Rioja Province, Rt. 38, 6 mi SE Patquia, 20 November 1976, sweeping Prosopis flexuosa. D-684. La Rioja Province, Rt. 38, 27 mi SE Patquia, 30 November 1976, sweeping Prosopis flexuosa. Sibinia concava is also known from Andalgala, Catamarca Province (Clark, 1978:135). Sibinia (Microtychius) algarobilla Clark, NEW SPECIES Pigss 12, 0, 145 17 Holotype.—°, Argentina: La Rioja Province, Rt. 38, 8 mi W border La Rioja—Cordoba, 30 November 1976, sweeping Prosopis seriacantha, D-691 (USNM Type no. 75853). Paratypes.—Same label data as holotype (1 2, D-690a; 1 d, D-690b). Diagnosis.—Distal portion of rostrum attenuate, not acuminate (Fig. 1); recumbent scales on elytral interspace 4 and on basal portions of interspaces 6 and 8 uniseriate, otherwise scales biseriate; pronotum and odd- and even- numbered elytral interspaces with prominent, erect, attenuate bristlelike scales; whitish and fulvous scales intermixed on pronotum and elytra. Description.—Length: 3, 1.78 mm; 2, 1.60-1.66 mm. Width: 3, 0.88 mm; 2, 0.84—0.88 mm. Eye: Height about 1.4 x length. Frons: Rounded separately from head (Fig. 1); erect scales forming a distinct superocular tuft. Rostrum: 3 and 2, 0.9 x pronotal length; in dorsal view distinctly tapered from base to antennal insertions, slightly narrowed just distad of insertions, then subparallel to tip; in dorsal profile, moderately rounded at base, nearly straight from just distad of base to tip; distal portion of male VOLUME 81, NUMBER 2 163 rostrum moderately long, 52% of total rostral length, slender, in lateral view slightly tapered, sulci obsolete; in female, distal portion longer, 50-58% of total rostral length, smooth, shining. Prothorax: Pronotum with round, con- cave, imbricated scales, and short, narrow, erect scales intermixed; pleuron with round, recumbent scales only; white scales present in large postero- median macula on dorsum; a few ferruginous scales present in large pos- teromedian macula and posterolaterally; fulvous and pale whitish scales intermixed elsewhere; scales on pleuron whitish. Elytra: Odd-numbered interspaces slightly wider than even-numbered ones; recumbent scales bi- seriate on each odd-numbered interspace and on interspace 2 posteriorly, mostly uniseriate on even-numbered interspaces; each odd-numbered inter- space and interspace 2 with median row of short, narrow, erect scales; other even-numbered interspaces without erect scales, or these sparse; white, fulvous, and ferruginous scales present in irregular pattern; white scales forming broad anteromedian macula and narrower, posteromedian macula; maculae separated by irregular transverse band of ferruginous scales; fer- ruginous and fulvous scales also variably intermixed mediobasally, else- where fulvous and whitish scales intermixed. Abdomen: Sterna 1—4 nearly flat medially in 3d, feebly convex in 2; sternum 5 of 3 not depressed me- dially; subapical constriction of sternum 5 of 2 obsolete. Median lobe: See Fig. 17. Spiculum ventrale: See Fig. 11. Spermatheca: See Fig. 14. Discussion.—Like S. concava, which it closely resembles, this minute Microtychius is most likely a bud predator of its Prosopis seriacantha host. In addition to the diagnostic characters listed, S. algarobilla is distinguished from §. concava by its shorter, stouter body form (cf. Figs. 1, 2, 5, 6). Etymology.—The name algarobilla is one of the vernacular names of the host (Rowell, 1969). It is the diminutive form of algarobo, the vernacular name applied in South America to all Prosopis with arched or straight fruits (Burkart and Simpson, 1977), most of which, like P. seriacantha, belong to the section A/garobia. The diminutive is appropriate for this very small weevil. PHYLOGENY In a reconstruction of the phylogeny of the New World species of Sibinia (Clark, 1978) five character states were hypothesized to indicate sister group relationships within the sulcifera group (numbers as on Figure 443 of that work): 23—spiculum ventrale with elongate, broadly forked base; 24—elytra with transverse diamond-shaped mediobasal fascia; 25—hosts in plant genus Prosopis; 26—Spermatheca as in Fig. 27 (of Clark, 1978); and 27—distal portion of female rostrum elongate, slender, cylindrical, smooth. 164 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON SULCIFERA ASULCIFERA MASTUERZO TINTITACO CONCAVA ALGAROBILLA SETOSA TRANSVERSA CUAUHTEMOC (1 261 CG 26a 5) 27 3) 93 (12) 25 2 1) 24 Fig. 21. Cladogram of phylogenetic relationships of su/cifera group of genus Sibinia. Num- bers at nodes designate hypothetical ancestors referred to in the text and in Clark (1978); numbers beside nodes designate apotypic character states referred to in the same places. A modified, apparently more parsimonious cladogram (Fig. 21), which also depicts relationships of the three new species from Argentina is now proposed. This arrangement requires assumption of loss of apotypic state 24 in S. sulcifera, rather than reversal or loss of state 23 in S. setosa, S. transversa, and §. cuauhtemoc required by the previously proposed system. Inference of the Prosopis host association in ancestor 12 requires assump- tion that S. sulcifera will be found to have a Prosopis host. All of the new Argentine species possess apotypic states 23, 24, and 25, but not 26. The latter state is probably a weak indication of relationship, however. Sper- mathecal shape in S. asulcifera and $. concava does not really differ greatly VOLUME 81, NUMBER 2 165 from that in §. sulcifera (Clark, 1978, Fig. 26) and in the new Argentine species (Figs. 14-16, herein). Instead, a system based on two additional apotypic states inferred in ancestors 14a and 14b (Fig. 21) is now proposed: 26a—pronotum without elongate, narrow scales, and 26b—round to subquadrate scales uniseriate on major portions of even- numbered elytral interspaces. No evidence of sister-group relationships among any two of the three different lines depicted as arising from each of ancestors 13 and 14a was found. Further collecting and search for apotypic states in the sulcifera group is important and desirable in light of the existence in the group of species in arid regions of both North and South America. The significance of these relationships in view of the amphitropical similarities of the floras of these disjunct regions is discussed below. BIOGEOGRAPHY The apparent amphitropical disjunct distribution of su/cifera-group mem- bers in arid regions of Argentina and North America brings to mind the well-known similarities of the disjunct floras of arid regions of North and South America, particularly the North American Sonoran Desert and the Argentine Monte. This is all the more intriguing because of the Prosopis host association of North and South American members of the sulcifera group. Prosopis is one of the major components of the floras of the arid regions of both continents (see Simpson, 1977). Various theories advanced to explain similarities in the floras of the Sonoran Desert and the Monte were reviewed by Solbrig et al. (1977). These authors concluded that at the family and generic levels the similarities had their origins “‘in the process of parallel or convergent evolution towards arid adaptations from common or closely related, more mesic ancestors.’ They cite Raven and Axelrod (1974), however, in describing the hypothesis that similarity in at least one element of the biotas whose relationships are closer than the generic level, the Larrea divaricata-L. tridentata disjunction, is the result of derivation from a transtropic ancestor which was widespread during periods of greater aridity in Pleistocene time. Raven (1963) suggested that one line of evidence which could be used to test hypotheses of long-range dispersal of plants against hypotheses of for- mer interconnection between disjunct arid areas of North and South Amer- ica would be examination of the phylogenetic relationships of insects as- sociated with the plants. He reasoned that if the similarities resulted from former interconnectedness the insects associated with the plants should be related, but that if long range dispersal were involved this probably would not be so. After review and comparison of distribution patterns of several different animal groups in the Sonoran Desert and Monte regions, Solbrig | | 166 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON 20 30 40+ PATAGONIA | \ SCALE \ ) 190-200-300 400 SOO 600 MILES \ f T rs tae T 7 \ fe) 200 400 600 800 KILOMETERS —— =! 50 SINUSOIDAL PROJECTION | 22 1 80 a 60 50 Fig. 22. sulcifera group; outline of biotic provinces (redrawn from Blair et al. 1976). Map of southern South America showing composite distribution of members of the VOLUME 81, NUMBER 2 167 et al. (1977) concluded that the faunas are ‘“‘much less related phylogenet- ically’’ than the floras. Raven and Axelrod (1975) went so far as to state that even when associated with the same sorts of plants, the animals of the two regions are ‘“‘very different.’’ Hurd and Linsley (1975) concluded that dis- similarity of the bee faunas north and south of the New World tropics, including those associated with Larrea, suggests lack of dispersal between the two regions. A comparable dissimilarity has been described in at least one other group of insects, the seed beetles or Bruchidae. The host associations of these insects are similar to those of su/cifera-group members. Stange et al. (1976) noted that bruchids attacking the dominant legume shrubs in the Monte and Sonoran Desert regions (Acacia, Cassia, Cercidium, Mimosa, and Prosopis spp.) belong to different genera, with the exception of three which are widely distributed throughout the Americas. Kingsolver et al. (1977) em- phasized the fact that this distinction also holds for the Prosopis-associated bruchids. According to these authors the bruchid species in the two disjunct regions are entirely different. They also state that distinct genera with ap- parent independent origins have radiated separately on Prosopis on the two continents. They do note the existence of two “‘sister genera’ of Prosopis- associated bruchids, A/garobius of North America, and Scutobruchus of South America. It would appear, then, that occurrence of very closely related members of the same genus of herbivorous insects in the disjunct Sonoran Desert and Monte regions represents an anomolous situation. Such is the case, how- ever, with the sulcifera group. It should be noted that like most animal groups reviewed by Solbrig et al. (1977), the sulcifera group contains species which occur outside the limits of the Sonoran Desert and Monte regions. Furthermore, like most of the bruchids reviewed by Kingsolver et al. (1977), some sulcifera group mem- bers have hosts other than species of Prosopis, namely species of Acacia. The only North American sulcifera-group member known to be associated with Prosopis, S. setosa, occurs throughout the southwestern United States and on the Mexican Plateau, in the semi-arid Valley of Oaxaca of southern Mexico, and in the West Indies (Clark, 1978). North American sulcifera- group members with Acacia hosts occur, for the most part, in the same areas of the United States and Mexico, although none is known from the West Indies (Clark, 1978). Conversely, South American sulcifera-group members are known only from Prosopis and only from the Argentine Monte and adjacent portions of the Chaco (Fig. 22). Their potential distributions are much more extensive, however. South American Prosopis spp. occur throughout the Chaco region of Argentina, Bolivia, and Paraguay, as well as in related plant formations in Uruguay and western Brazil and in the arid inter-Andean valleys of Bo- 168 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON Fig. 23. North and South America showing the generalized distribution of the genus Pro- sopis in the New World (redrawn from Simpson and Solbrig, 1977). livia, Peru, and Colombia. Their ranges thus extend at interrupted intervals, throughout the length of the continent. Some also occur in northern Vene- zuela and along the Pacific Coast of Middle America from the Isthmus of Panama to southern California (Fig. 23). Thus the su/cifera group has an almost continuous potential distribution between the regions in which it is) now known. Considering the possibility that these arid and semiarid ‘‘step-) ping stones’? were more extensive at intervals during the Pleistocene, it seems possible that the apparent disjunction is not and never has been a i VOLUME 81, NUMBER 2 169 reality. If this is so, however, we may wonder about the apparent lack of corollary relationship among the Prosopis-associated bruchids. The paucity of collection records for members of the genus Sibinia from much of South America, and especially from the Andean corridor, is re- grettable. Further collecting of weevils and bruchids on mimosoids, espe- cially Prosopis, in Central and South America is needed. Prosopis plants have been sampled at a few stations along the Pacific Coast in Chiapas, Mexico, and in Panama, as well as on the tip of the Yucatan Penninsula, where no Sibinia were found. More concerted efforts at different times of the year may change this. Further collecting on Prosopis and other mimo- soids in the Monte itself, in the Chaco, and particularly along the Andean cordillera, promises to provide valuable evidence which may help answer previously posed questions about Sibinia phylogeny (Clark, 1978), and may even shed further light on the history and nature of the floristic similarities of the disjunct arid regions of North and South America. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thanks are extended to B. B. Simpson and W. N. Mathis (Smithsonian Institution) and J. M. Kingsolver and D. R. Whitehead (Systematic Ento- mology Laboratory SEA, USDA) for critical reviews. Habitus photos (Figs. 19-20) were taken by D. M. Anderson (Systematic Entomology Laboratory SEA, USDA). The study reported here was carried out at the USNM, and I thank the Department of Entomology, Smithsonian Institution, for pro- viding working space, equipment, and access to the collections. LITERATURE CITED Blair, W. F., A. C. Hulse, and M. A. Mares. 1976. Origins and affinities of vertebrates of the North American Sonoran Desert and the Monte Desert of northwestern Argentina. J. Biogr. 3(1):1-18. Burkart, A. 1940. Materiales para una monografia del genero ‘‘Prosopis.’’ Darwiniana. 4:57— 128. Burkart, A. and B. B. Simpson. 1977. Appendix: the genus Prosopis and annotated key to the species of the world. P. 201-215. Jn B. B. Simpson (ed.), Mesquite: its biology in two desert ecosystems. US/IBP Synthesis Series 4. Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Inc., Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania. 250 p. Clark, W. E. 1978. The weevil genus Sibinia Germar: natural history, taxonomy, phylogeny, and zoogeography, with revision of the New World species. Quaest. Entomol. 14:91- 387. Hurd, P. D., Jr. and E. G. Linsley. 1975. The principle Larrea bees of the southwestern United States (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Smiths. Contr. Zool. 193. Smithsonian Insti- tution Press, Washington, D.C. 74 p. Kingsolver, J. M., C. D. Johnson, S. R. Swier, and A. Teran. 1977. Prosopis fruits as a resource for invertebrates. P. 108-122. Jn B. B. Simpson (ed.), Mesquite: its biology in two desert ecosystems. US/IBP Synthesis Series 4. Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Inc., Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania. 250 p. 170 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON Raven, P. H. 1963. Amphitropical relations in the flora of North and South America. Quart. Rev. Biol. 29:151-177. Raven, P. H. and D. I. Axelrod. 1974. Angiosperm biogeography and past continental move- ments. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 61(3):539-673. . 1975. History of the flora and fauna of Latin America. Am. Sci. 63(4):420-429. Rogers, C. W., W. E. Clark, and H. R. Burke. 1975. Biosystematics of Sibinia sulcatula (Casey) on mesquite. Southwest. Natur. 20(3):303-314. Rowell, C. M., Jr. 1969. The taxonomy and phytogeography of the genus Prosopis L. P. 4— 19. In J. L. Schuster (ed.), Literature on the Mesquite (Prosopis L.) of North America: an annotated bibliography. Special Report No. 26, International Center for Arid and Semi-Arid Land Studies. Texas Tech. Univ., Lubbock, Texas. 84 p. Simpson, B. B. (ed.). 1977. Mesquite: its biology in two desert ecosystems. US/IBP Synthesis Series 4. Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Inc., Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania. 250 p. Simpson, B. B. and O. T. Solbrig. 1977. Introduction. P. 1-25. Jn B. B. Simpson (ed.), Mesquite: its biology in two desert ecosystems. US/IBP Synthesis Series 4. Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Inc., Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania. 250 p. Solbrig, O. T., W. F. Blair, F. A. Enders, A. C. Hulse, J. H. Hunt, M. A. Mares, J. Neff, D. Otte, B. B. Simpson, and C. S. Tomoff. 1977. The biota: the dependent variable. P. 50-66. In G. H. Orians and O. T. Solbrig (eds.), Convergent evolution in warm deserts. US/IBP Synthesis Series 3. Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Inc., Stroudsburg, Pennsyl- vania. 333 p. Stange, L. A., A. L. Teran, and A. Willink. 1976. Entomofauna de la provincia biogeografica del Monte. Acta Zool. Lilloana. 32(5):73-120. Ward, C. R., C. W. O’Brien, L. B. O’Brien, D. E. Foster, and E. W. Huddleston. 1977. Annotated checklist of New World insects associated with Prosopis (mesquite). Tech. Bull. No. 1557. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. 115 p. EpbITorR’s NOTE Contributors of articles to the Proceedings are advised that illustrations are kept for one year after they are published. If an author does not request the return of his or her illustrations within that one year, the illustrations will be discarded. Authors are reminded that illustrations are returned at the authors’ expense. The editor has a stack of illustrations from several past volumes. These illustrations will be discarded on December 1, 1979, unless otherwise claimed. PROC. ENTOMOL. SOC. WASH. 81(2), 1979, pp. 171-177 THREE NEW SPECIES OF HYDROPORUS (COLEOPTERA: DYTISCIDAE) FROM THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES G. WILLIAM WOLFE AND JAMES F. MATTA (GWW) Department of Zoology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37916; and (JEM) Department of Biological Sciences, Old Do- minion University, Norfolk, Virginia 23508. Abstract.—Three new species of Hydroporus, jenniferae, jeanneae, and folkertsi, are described from Tennessee and Alabama. All three species are placed in the pulcher group of Hydroporus. During the past three years, extensive collecting in Tennessee has re- vealed two new species of Hydroporus, which are rather common and wide- spread in central Tennessee. A third species, generously provided by Dr. G. W. Folkerts, is known only from the type-locality in Jefferson Co., Al- abama. All three species are placed in the pulcher group of Hydroporus based on their narrow form, prosternal setae (in two of the species), and apically bifid aedeagus. The importance of the apically bifid aedeagus in characterizing species of the pulcher group has previously been pointed out by Leech (1949). Fall (1923) keyed and discussed all previously described species in the pulcher group, except H. laetus which was described by Leech in 1949. Hydroporus jenniferae Wolfe and Matta, NEW SPECIES Diagnosis.—Hydroporus jenniferae is most closely related to Hydroporus ohionis and will key to that species in Fall’s (1923) revision. It is easily distinguished from H. ohionis by its larger average size and paler more yellowish head. In addition the tip of the aedeagus of H. jenniferae is much more hook shaped than in H. ohionis. Description of holotype.—d, length 3.3 mm, width 1.7 mm, L/W 1.94. Form elongate evenly oval, with pronotum and elytra in continuous outline, widest at middle. Lateral margins of pronotum evenly rounded toward an- terior angles, lateral bead distinct, at maximum width about equal to width of the 4th antennal segment. Prosternal setae evident but somewhat sparse. Prosternal prominence evidently angulate but not distinctly protuberant; prosternal file present; prosternal process broadened, narrowly lanceolate 172 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON @) b © d e f Fig. 1. Aedeagus of: Hydroporus jenniferae, a) side b) dorsal; H. jeanneae c) side d) dorsal; H. folkertsi e) side f) dorsal. posterior to anterior coxae; with median area rounded, lateral margins taper toward bluntly rounded apex. Not strongly shining dorsally. Head pale yellow, vaguely infuscate at occiput, antenna pale yellow with 11th segment infuscate. Pronotum with an even broad black band along entire anterior margin. Posterior margin of pronotum with a black band of variable width, narrower on each side, ex- panding medially in undulating fashion and coalescing with anterior band at areas of maximum width. Paler isolated discal areas of pronotum reddish yellow. Elytra with 2 rather broad undulating narrowly connected blackish- brown fascia, the anterior fascia at middle of elytra, the 2nd in posterior 4%. Dark sutural stripe extending from apex to base then extending about % width of elytral base. Ventral surface primarily reddish yellow with meso- sternum, lateral edges of metaepisterum, metacoxae, and abdominal sterna slightly infuscate. Dorsal surface with perceptible reticulate microsculpture. Punctation of head sparse and fine. Pronotum with line of coarser and denser punctures posterior and adjacent to anterior margin, discally punctures sparser and finer; along posterior pronotal areas punctures coarser, these being restrict- ed to posterior infuscation. Elytral punctation fine and sparse, coarsest dis- cally and finer laterally and apically, a very poorly defined longitudinal series of denser punctures is discernible in discal area of each elytron. Ventrally metacoxae rather coarsely punctate, metasternum even more so, medial punctures finer on both metacoxae and metasternum. Abdominal punctures fine, except on sterna | and 2 which are coarser. Pro- and mesotarsi relatively short and broad, articles 1 and 2 with small VOLUME 81, NUMBER 2 173 palettes, anterior protarsal claw modified, more strongly curved at base and slightly sinuate on inside, posterior claw modified but less so than anterior claw. Aedeagus apically bifid and shaped as in Fig. la, b. Allotype.—@, length 3.6 mm, width 1.8 mm, L/W 2.00. Similar to male but slightly longer and broader, pro- and mesotarsi less dilated, anterior protarsal claw not modified, evenly curved and tapered. Abdominal sterna more infuscate. Variation —Males (n = 20); & = 3.3 mm (3.4-3.0), W = 1.6 mm (1.7— 4) 1c / Wi—="2.06 Females (n= 23); lL) = 3.4 mmiG.7-3:1), W = 1-7 mm (1.7-1.6), L/W = 2.00. Anterior and posterior pronotal bands vary from nar- rowly connected to broadly separated. Some specimens have elytral fascia so reduced that they are separated from each other and the sutural stripe. Females are more alutaceous and are generally more infuscate ventrally. The ventral infuscation varies from practically none to almost completely darkened sterna. Habitat.—So far known only from central Tennessee, its presence in cen- tral Kentucky is likely. The large type-series is from a small stream (8 to 10 feet wide) with expansive slabs of bedrock. The beetles were found, among leaves and filamentous algae, in fissures and depressions in the bedrock which contained one to several inches of water. Hydroporus jenniferae was also taken from small and medium sized intermittent streams with gravel or gravel and sand substrates, usually among leaves and/or algae. Etymology.—This species is named for the senior author’s daughter, Jen- nifer, who has accompanied him on many field trips and has assisted in many of the collections. Type-data.—Holotype and allotype: TENNESSEE: Trousdale Co., Rocky Cr. approximately 1 mi N Barthelia on Hwy. 231-10, 20 June 77, G. W. Wolfe and Jennifer and Jeanne Wolfe. Paratypes: Same locality data; 164 specimens. Lincoln Co., Cane Cr. at Old Fishing Ford Bridge, 0.8 mi from Hwy. 431, 7 May 77, 2 specimens, G. W. Wolfe and J. Louton. Spring Cr. off county road 4281 approximately 1 mi N Blakeville, 5 May 77, 10 specimens, G. W. Wolfe, G. S. Schuster, B. Wunderlin. Marshall Co., Trib- utary to East Fork Globe Cr. 2 mi E jet. I-65 and Hwy. SOA, 25 July 76, 35 specimens, G. W. Wolfe and J. L. Louton. Spring Creek at county road 4278 ridge just off Hwy. 99, 25 July 76, 14 specimens, G. W. Wolfe and J. L. Louton. Dekalb Co., Dry Cr. 7 air mi W of Smithville, 13 Sept. 77, 9 specimens, G. W. Wolfe, B. H. Bauer, and D. Nieland. Maury Co., Flat Cr. at Hwy. 99, 22 June 77, 7 specimens, G. W. Wolfe. Summner Co., Dry Fork Cr. at Hwy. 31 E, 3 Aug 77, 8 specimens, G. W. Wolfe. Williamson Co., Rutherford Cr. at Hwy. 431-10, 22 June 77, 10 specimens, G. W. Wolfe. Deposition of type-material.—The holotype and allotype are deposited in the United States National Museum of Natural History (NMNH) Type no. 75498. Also deposited in the NMNH are one male and one female paratype 174 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON from Trousdale Co., Tenn. One male and one female paratype from the type-locality (Trousdale Co.) have been deposited with each of the follow- ing: Snow Museum, University of Kansas; Michigan State University; Cal- ifornia Academy of Sciences (San Francisco); Dr. W. L. Hilsenhoff, Uni- versity of Wisconsin; Dr. W. U. Brigham, Illinois Natural History Survey; Dr. J. R. Zimmerman, New Mexico State University; Dr. F. N. Young, University of Indiana; Mr. R. E. Roughly, University of Alberta; Dr. G. W. Folkerts, Auburn University; Hugh B. Leech, Angwin, California; Fredrico Angelini, Francavilla Fontana, Italy. The 35 paratypes from Marshall Co. are deposited with Dr. J. F. Matta, Old Dominion University. All other type-material is deposited with the senior author. Hydroporus jeanneae Wolfe and Matta, NEW SPECIES Diagnosis.—Hydroporus jeanneae keys to Hydroporus oppositus in Fall (1923). It may be separated from H. oppositus, and all other species of the pulcher group, by its unique dorsal color pattern which consists of a pale yellowish fascia in the basal one third and apical one fifth of the elytra and a single larger dark brownish fascia in the posterior two thirds. It might be confused with the darker forms of H. oppositus which are sometimes almost completely infuscated dorsally (especially specimens from the northeastern United States); however, in these specimens the dark fascia is more reddish and almost covers the entire dorsal surface of the elytra. Description of holotype.—Length 3.4 mm, width 1.7 mm, L/W 2.00. Form as in H. jenniferae. Lateral bead of pronotum distinct and approximately 4/; as wide as 4th antennal segment. Prosternal setae distinct and dense. Prosternal prominence distinctly angulate and more acutely produced than in H. jenniferae. Prosternal process essentially as in H. jenniferae. Not strongly shining dorsally. Head light brownish yellow and vaguely infuscate on each side of head between eyes and at occiput. Antennae light reddish yellow with 11th segment infuscate. Pronotum entirely dark reddish brown, slightly darker anteriorly. Elytra with | large dark fascia in posterior 24, pale yellow band across basal % and at apical '/s, restricted pale circular areas are also evident in lateral areas of dark discal fascia. Dark brownish sutural stripe extending from apex to base of elytra then laterally along 74 basal width, expanding at middle of base. Ventral surface orangish. Dorsal surface with perceptible reticulate micro-sculpture. Punctation on head sparse and fine. Pronotal punctation finer discally, elytral punctation slightly coarser than in H. jenniferae and vague discal longitudinal series of denser punctures evident; ventral punctation as in H. jenniferae but slightly finer and denser. Protarsi as in H. jenniferae. Anterior protarsal claw rather strongly mod- ified; strongly bent at base, thickened and distinctly sinuate internally. Pos- / VOLUME 81, NUMBER 2 175 | trerior protarsal claw less distinctly modified than anterior claw. Aedeagus distinct, apically bifid and deeply cleft (Fig. Ic, d). Allotype.—@, length 3.3 mm, width 1.7 mm, L/W 1.90. Similar to male but slightly more alutaceous. Anterior tarsi narrower and anterior claw evenly curved and tapering. Abdominal sterna more infuscate. Variation.—Males (n = 11), L = 3.3 mm (.4-3.1), W = 1.7 mm (1.7- 1:6); L/W = 1.90. Females (9 = 12), L-= 3.4 mm (3.5-3.3), W = 1.7 mm (1.8-1.7), L/W = 2.00. The large discal dark fascia is of variable size, some- times isolated from lateral and basal areas of elytra. At maximum extent it reaches the lateral edges and is connected to the dark basal area by a narrow dark stripe on each elytron. The ventral color varies from orangish to red- dish brown. Habitat.—The same as for H. jenniferae, however, this species is usually found in fewer numbers. Etymology.—This species is named after the senior author’s wife, Jeanne, who has encouraged and assisted him continuously during his studies. Type-data.—Holotype and allotype: TENNESSEE: Trousdale Co. same locality as for H. jenniferae. Paratypes: Trousdale Co. same locality data, 21 specimens. Summner Co. same data as for H. jenniferae, 3 specimens. Dekalb Co., stream at base of cliff at Hwy. 141 by Center Hill Dam, 26 June 77, | specimen, G. W. Wolfe and J. Louton. Marshall Co., Spring Cr. at county road 4278 bridge just off Hwy. 99, 25 July 1976, 1 specimen, G. W. Wolfe and J. L. Louton. Tributary to east fork of Globe Creek, 2 mi E of Junction I-65 and Hwy. 50A, 25 July 76, 2 specimens, G. W. Wolfe and J1:.Louton. Deposition of type-material.—The holotype and allotype are deposited in the United States National Museum of Natural History (NMNH) as Type no. 75499. Also deposited in the NMNH are one male and one female para- type from the type-locality. One male and one female paratype from the type-locality are deposited with each of the following: Dr. G. W. Folkerts, Auburn University; Dr. F. N. Young, University of Indiana; Hugh B. Leech, Angwin, California; Dr. J. R. Zimmerman, New Mexico State Uni- versity; California Academy of Sciences (San Francisco); Dr. J. F. Matta, Old Dominion University. All other type-material is retained by the senior author. Hydroporus folkertsi Wolfe and Matta, NEW SPECIES Diagnosis.—This species keys to couplet 7 in Fall (1923) but does not fit any of the alternatives given at the couplet. It may be separated from H. pulcher, H. cocheconis and H. laetus by its coarser dorsal punctation. In addition the pronotum is infuscate along the anterior and posterior edges and is yellow discally and laterally. Hydroporus laetus has the pronotum 176 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON uniformly reddish brown while both pulcher and cocheconis have the pos- _ terior infuscation reduced. Description of holotype.— Musa, pineapple, and lily leaf axils, 16 ¢, 5 9, larvae, pupae (USNM). ' NATAL: Eshowe, Zululand, 1935, B. de Meillon, from hole in a tree fern, ) 2 3, 10 pupal exuviae (SAIMR). SIERRA LEONE: Freetown, 1915-356, A. Bacot, larva in leaf axils of ‘“‘cocked hat tree’? (Dracaena sp.), 1 3 (selected here as LECTOTYPE) (BMNH). UGANDA: Kampala, viii.1931, E. G. 192 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON Gibbins, 3 6, 5 2 (BMNH). Fort Portal, 25.ix.1931, E. G. Gibbins, 4 ¢ (BMNH). Forcipomyia (Phytohelea) brevis (Johannsen) Apelma brevis Johannsen, 1927:205 (all stages; Hawaii; on pineapples); II- lingworth, 1934:542 (figures all stages; life history; on pineapples); Wil- liams, 1944:172 (notes; Hawaii). Forcipomyia (Trichohelea) brevis (Johannsen); Hardy, 1960:179 (rede- scribed; Hawaii; figs.). Types.—Holotype 6, allotype 2, Waipahu, Oahu, 7-8-27, J. P. Illing- worth, ex pineapple leaf sheath (Type no. 75308, USNM). Paratypes, all stages, in USNM and CU. Specimens examined.—HAWAII: Kunia, Oahu, 1.x.1945, 18th Labora- tory, W. W. Wirth, light trap, 1 2 (USNM). Schofield Barracks, Oahu, 10.xi.1945, W. W. Wirth, light trap, 1 2 (USNM). Waipahu, 7-8-27, J. P. Illingworth, holotype and allotype (pinned, USNM); 1 d, 1 2 (pinned), 3 3,2 2, 2 larvae, 2 pupae (slides) (CU). NEW YORK: In pineapple (Plant Quarantine) from Hawaii, xii.1968, 2 larvae, 2 pupae (USNM). Forcipomyia (Phytohelea) nicopina Chan and LeRoux Forcipomyia (Trichohelea) nicopina Chan and LeRoux, 1971:754 (all stages; Singapore; figs.). Types.—Holotype, fourth-instar larva, Wallace Way, Singapore, v.1962, K. L. Chan, in watery detritus in apical leaf axils of pineapple plants (in Lyman Entomological Museum, Macdonald College, Quebec). Paratypes, 2 larvae, 3 pupae, 2 2, 9 do, and 31 associated pupal exuviae, same data (in Chan collection). Specimens examined.—SINGAPORE: Wallace Way, ix.1961, K. L. Chan, in water in axils of pineapple plant, 1 d, 2 2 (topotypes, USNM). Discussion.—We cannot separate this species from F. brevis on the basis of our rather inadequate material. From the descriptions, the larvae may be separated by the yellow-brown head and 3-branched anal blood gills in ni- copina, and the whitish head and simple (unbranched) anal blood gills in brevis. Forcipomyia (Phytohelea) oligarthra Saunders Forcipomyia (Trichohelea) oligarthra Saunders, 1956:698 (all stages; Puerto Rico; figs.); Tokunaga and Murachi, 1959:209 (redescribed; Caroline Is- lands; fig. female); Tokunaga, 1961:115 (all stages; New Britain; figs.; larvae in axils of cultivated banana). Types.—Holotype @, allotype 6, Corcega Beach, Puerto Rico, 22.11.1953, L. G. Saunders, reared from larvae in leaf axils of terrestrial bromeliads, Bromelia pinguin L. (deposited in Canadian National Collection, Ottawa). VOLUME 81, NUMBER 2 193 2 J 25 Figs. 21-26. Forcipomyia dominicana. 21, Male pret 22, Male aedeagus, ventral view. 23, Male aedeagus, lateral view (st, sternal side; tg, tergal side). 24, Palpal segments IlI-V of female. 25, Male paramere of one side, ventral view. 26, Male paramere in side view. Figs. 27-28. Antennal segments II-IV of female. 27, F. tzaneenensis. 28, F. domini- cana. Paratypes, many, all stages, Puerto Rico, Montserrat, Dominica, Guyana, from pineapple. Specimens examined.—FLORIDA: Sebring, 15—27.xi.1927, M. R. Os- burn and M. DuPree, pineapple plants, | ¢d, 1 2 (USNM). PUERTO RICO: San Juan, 25.vi.1962, L. G. Saunders, in pineapple, 6 d, 5 2 (USNM). SINGAPORE: 1.x.1952, D. H. Colless, pineapple leaf axils, 2 ¢, 2 pupal -exuviae, | larva (USNM). - Note.—Saunders (1956) recorded oligarthra from British West Indies, Guyana, Mexico, and Cuba. Tokunaga (1961) reported the species from 194 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON | New Britain in leaf axils of banana. Tokunaga and Murachi (1959) also recorded it from Palau in Micronesia. THE BROMELICOLA GROUP The species belonging to this group in which the females have two sper- mathecae and 15-segmented antennae are antiguensis, belkini, bromelicola, caribbeana, crinume, dominicana, edwardsi, jocosa, magna, and marksae. KEY TO SPECIES OF THE BROMELICOLA GROUP 1. Male with well-developed empodium .......%.%%< 22. -25 2 sc dee okie 2 — Male with empodium reduced to a single thread or absent .......... 3 2. Hind tarsal ratio 2.0; female palpal segments IV and V completely fused; pupa with a spherical, spinose tubercle on operculum ...... AAS OT Oe ROHS Ni PSE RCS. SORT a Fae jJocosa Saunders — Hind tarsal ratio near 3.0; female palpal segments IV and V partly or wholly separated; pupa without such tubercle . crinume (Tokunaga) 3. Hind tarsal ratio 2.0; pupa with caudal setae 2 as long again as the rami; larva with lateral setae arising from papillae ............... AS Cee Ee en eee antiguensis Saunders — Hind tarsal ratio larger; pupa with caudal setae shorter than or about as long as the rami; lateral setae of larva not on papillae ........... 4 4. Lateral setae of larva finned; pupal respiratory horn expanded before apex; spermatheca without sclerotized neck. . . «0. Saacess eee 5 — Lateral setae of larva unmodified; respiratory horn of pupa not ex- panded; spermatheca with slender sclerotized neck (except in bro- PCH EOID) ae cP IO RS CAs oc 56 stos MGs a 6 Ae Bik, Steers bed hn eee 6 5. Sensory pit of female palpus shallow, depth less than diameter of OY OSTTUITY 5. 9 cae Seo tere cy 3 Stare ee EES roe caribbeana Saunders — Sensory pit of female palpus deep, depth equal to or more than diameter omoOpemingyn. a0 eee ee eee ee magna (Saunders)? edwardsi (Saunders) 6. Sensory pit of female palpus deep (see couplet 5)... =... a5... eee 7 =) Sensory pit of female palpus shallow .....2<.... «5. .s00 Soe 8 7. Male aedeagus with apical pair of slender, sclerotized hooks; pupal respiratory organ with 20-25 spiracular openings; pupal caudal rami long, 1.3x as long as base of segment IX ......... marksae Tokunaga 2 Material at hand does not permit the separation of these two species. Saunders (1925) gives the size of the spermathecae of edwardsi as 0.053 by 0.041 mm, but in 4 specimens, including syntypes, measured by us the mean size of the larger spermatheca was 0.081 by 0.067 mm (range 0.075—0.088 by 0.062—0.081 mm). The spermathecae of magna are even larger, mea- suring 0.094 by 0.081 mm and 0.088 by 0.069 mm. If these differences in size are stable they will allow separation of the two species. VOLUME 81, NUMBER 2 195 — Male aedeagus with apical pair of broadly rounded lobes; pupal res- piratory organ with 15 spiracular openings; pupal caudal rami short, O:8 monstrosum and inaequale will be needed to decide whether e two names apply to the sexes of one species. The type of D. monstrosum 1s labeled: Espirito-Santo Brasil ex. coll. Fruhstorfer, Type, TYPE, Dasytanobium monstrosum Pic. The type of D. inaequale is labeled: Caraca (Minas Geraez) Bresil, E. Gounelle 1.2.1885, Dasytide?, L-Exchange no. 209, Type, TYPE, Dasytanobium inaequale Pic. Viana and Martinez (1971) erected the new subfamily Alvarenganiellinae for their new genus and species; I am in agreement that a new subfamily is appropriate so it remains unchanged. In addition to D. monstrosum and inaequale, the Hawaiian species Xy- letobius timberlakei Perkins (1921:505) belongs in Alvarenganiellinae. Dasytanobium timberlakei (Perkins), NEW COMBINATION This is a provisional assignment, for the species shows notable differences (most obvious in the antennal form) from both monstrosum and inaequale, and likely deserves a genus by itself. Pseudodorcatoma Pic Pseudodorcatoma Pic, 1905:171. Cryptoramorphus White, 1966:959. SYNONYM? Unfortunately, I have not seen Pic’s type of the type-species (P. ornata Pic), but I have examined a specimen determined by P. Lepesme as P. ornata Pic. If Lepesme’s identification is correct, then my Cryptoramorphus is a synonym of Pseudodorcatoma. Also, on the basis of Lepesme’s iden- tification, the original, brief description of Pseudodorcatoma may be in error in stating that the antennae are 8 or 9 segmented (they are 11 seg- mented in the Lepesme specimen); and, Psewdodorcatoma seems to be not closely related to Dorcatoma Herbst, to which Pic compared it. SOLIER ANOBIUM SPECIES Solier described nine Anobiidae from Chile that he placed in Anobium; I have seen the types of seven of these. Most of the species belong to genera that were not yet described when Solier did his work; the species are below reassigned generically or their generic status is discussed. None of the spec- imens was designated in print as type and only one bears a type-label, so I below designate lectotypes for six species. I below assign two of Solier’s species to Xy/etomerus. M. Pic described eight Chilean anobiids in Xyletomerus; unfortunately, none of the types of these species was available to me in Paris. It is likely that certain of Pic’s 216 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON species are synonyms of Solier species. Two of the species below do not belong to genera with which I am familiar. Further study may show that new genera should be described for these two species. Xyletomerus cylindricus (Solier), NEW COMBINATION Anobium cylindricum Solier, 1849:472. The LECTOTYPE that I hereby designate bears the data: Anobium cy- lindricum Sol. Chile. Xyletomerus fumosus (Solier), NEW COMBINATION Anobium fumosum Solier, 1849:471. The data on the holotype are: Museum Paris, Chile, Cl. Gay 1845, An- obium fumosum Sol. Santiago, TYPE. Xyletinus oblongus (Solier), NEW COMBINATION Anobium oblongum Solier, 1849:471. The LECTOTYPE that I hereby designate has the data: Anobium oblon- gum Ziegel. Chile Coquimbo. Euvrilletta nigra (Solier), NEW COMBINATION Anobium nigrum Solier, 1849:470. The data on the specimen I hereby designate as LECTOTYPE are: An- obium nigrum Sol. Sa Rosa. This species does not agree well in general form with other members of Euvrilletta, but it is better placed here than in any other genus known to me. Trichobiopsis spinolae (Solier), NEW COMBINATION Anobium spinolae Solier, 1849:469. Nicobium spinolae (Solier), Pic, 1912:32. The specimen I hereby designate as LECTOTYPE (with data: Anobium spinolae Sol., Illapel), from Chile, is damaged with most appendages miss- ing; and it is badly encrusted with foreign material. From what I can see of the morphology, the species most likely belongs in Trichobiopsis (White, 1973:846), but does not exhibit the generic characters to the same degree as does the type-species, T. excavata White. That is, the sternal groove is less deep and less strongly marked off, the abdominal sutures are weak medially but not obliterated as in 7. excavata, and only the last segment of the labial palpus is notched, and not also the last segment of the maxillary palpus as in excavata. VOLUME 81, NUMBER 2 217 Anobium lunatum Solier Anobium lunatum Solier, 1849:472. The specimen I here designate as LECTOTYPE has: Anobium lunatum Sol. Chile. This species belongs in Xyletininae, but I am not sure to what genus. Anobium acutangulum Solier Anobium acutangulum Solier, 1849:470. The LECTOTYPE that I here designate has the data: Anobium acutan- gulum Sol., Coquimbo, Coquimbo. This species belongs in the Anobiinae near the genus Priobium Motsch., but exhibits notable differences from that genus. I am uncertain to what genus this species belongs. Lepesme’s Picatoma Protheca LeConte, 1865:241. Picatoma Lepesme, 1947:224. NEW SYNONYM. I have compared the type-species of Protheca (P. hispida LeConte) with specimens determined by Lepesme as Picatoma guadalupensis (Pic), the type-species of Picatoma; and I found that they are distinguishable on a species level only. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My thanks are extended to Dr. Jean Menier and Mme. A. Bons (both of Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle in Paris) for assistance during this work. LITERATURE CITED Blackwelder, R. E. 1945. Checklist of the Coleopterous insects of Mexico, Central America, the West Indies, and South America. Pt. 3. Smith. Inst. U.S. Natl. Mus. Bull. 185:343- 550. Gorham, H. S. 1883. Family Ptinidae. Jn Biologia Centrali-Americana. Insecta. Coleoptera. 3(2): 194-209. LeConte, J. L. 1865. Prodromus of a monograph of the species of the tribe Anobiini, of the Family Ptinidae, inhabiting North America. Proc. Ac. Nat. Sci. Phil. 17:222-244. Lepesme, P. 1947. Bostrychoidea. Jn Fleutiaux, et al., Coleopteres des Antilles, Faune de L’Empire France, VII, vol. 1, p. 194-233. Perkins, R. C. L. 1921. Notes on Hawaiian Plagithmysides and Anobiides (Col.) with descrip- tions of new species. Proc. Hawaii. Entomol. Soc. 4(3): 493-506. Pic, M. 1902a. Contribution a l’etude des Xyletini du Brasil. Ann. Soc. Entomol. Belg. 46:17- 18. / ——.. 1902b. Diagnoses de Coleopteres de L’Ancien et du nouveau monde. L’Echange, Rev. Linn. 18(209):23-26. ——. 1902c. Coléopteres Brésiliens Nouveaux. Le Naturaliste. 24(357):21. nN 18 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON 1905. Captures diverses, noms nouveaux, et diagnoses (Coléopteres). L’Echange, Rev. Linn. 21(250):169-171. 1910. Coléopteres exotiques nouveaux ou peu connus. L’Echange, Rev. Linn. 26(308):60-63. 1912. Anobiidae. Jn Coleopterorum Catalogus, W. Junk, Berlin. 10(48): 1-92. 1915a. Nouveautes de diverses Familles. Mel. Exotico-Ento. 13:2-20. 1915b. Nouvelles especes de diverses Familles. Mel. Exotico-Ento. 15:2-20. 1922. Nouveautes diverses. Mel. Exotico-Ento. 34:1-32. 1923. Nouveautes diverses. Mel. Exotico-Ento. 39:3-32. 1927a. Fauna sumatrensis (Beitrag Nr. 49) Byrrhidae, Dermestidae, Anobiidae, Bru- ehidae! Suppl. Entomol. 16:49-50. . 1927b. Nouveautes diverses. Mel. Exotico-Ento. 48:1—32. 1932. Nouveautes diverses. Mel. Exotico-Ento. 60: 1-36. | Solier, A. 1849. Orden III. Coleoptera. Jn Gay, Historia fisica y politica de Chile... . 4:414— | Slits Viana, M. and A. Martinez. 1971. Una nueva subfamilia de Anobiidae (Insecta, Coleoptera). Neotropica. 17(54):121-126. White, R. 1966. Cryptoramorphus floridanus, new genus, new species (Coleoptera: Anobi- idae), with generic reassignments. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 59(5):959-961. —. 1967. The Tricorynus of Mexico (Coleoptera: Anobiidae). Trans. Am. Entomol. Soc. 93: 1-40. . 1973. Neotropical Anobiidae: new genera and species, and taxonomic notes (Coleop- tera). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 66(4):843-848. PROC. ENTOMOL. SOC. WASH. 81(2), 1979, pp. 219-221 THE TYPE-SPECIES OF THE GENUS LEPTOPHLEBIA WESTWOOD (EPHEMEROPTERA: LEPTOPHLEBIIDAE) MICHAEL D. HUBBARD Laboratory of Aquatic Entomology, Florida A&M University, Tallahas- see, Florida 32307. Abstract.—The type-species of the genus Leptophlebia Westwood is Ephemera vespertina L., not Ephemera marginata L. as has been com- monly supposed. _ The identity of the type-species of any genus is of crucial importance to the taxonomy of that genus because the type-species serves as the basis for any definition of the genus; any redefinition or modification of the generic limits must take into account the type-species. It is therefore important to understand the correct concept of the type-species of a genus before any taxonomy (at least at the generic level) or systematics involving that genus is begun. Any errors in the present concept of the identity of a type-species may well be transformed into greater errors in work of the future if left uncorrected today. One such error has persisted in the literature since it was first introduced in 1881. The genus Leptophlebia Westwood, 1840, is one of the largest genera of Ephemeroptera and is the type-genus of the family Leptophlebi- idae which contains about one-quarter of the extant genera of mayflies. The type-species has generally been thought to be Ephemera marginata Lin- naeus, 1767. Eaton (1871) in his Monograph on the Ephemeridae listed no type-species for the genus Leptophlebia. However, he divided the genus into 4 “‘series”’ and gave a type-species for each. “‘Series 3,’ which included Leptophlebia vespertina Linnaeus, 1758, and eight other species, was given Ephemera marginata for a type-species. Following this Eaton (1881) restricted the definition of the genus Leptophlebia sensu stricto to coincide with ‘‘series 3’’. The type-species of “‘series 3’’, Ephemera marginata, was retained by Eaton as the type-species of Leptophlebia (restricted). Since this time, all major works treating the Leptophlebiidae which list type-species (e.g., Ea- ton, 1884; Needham, Traver, and Hsu, 1935; Grandi, 1960; Landa, 1969; Peters and Edmunds, 1970; Edmunds, Jensen, and Berner, 1976) have con- PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON nN td —_) sistently given Ephemera marginata as the type-species of the genus Lep- tophlebia, apparently following Eaton (or each other). An investigation of the original establishment of Leptophlebia (West- wood, 1840) however, reveals that the genus was erected for Ephemera vespertina L., and ‘‘the allied species.’’ The present International Code of Zoological Nomenclature requires that the type-species of a genus be one of the originally included nominal species, and that if only one nominal species is originally included, it is the type-species by monotypy. Thus, Ephemera vespertina L., 1758, must be regarded as the type-species of Leptophlebia Westwood, 1840 (type by indication: monotypy), not Ephem- era marginata as has been commonly, but erroneously, accepted. There is little doubt as to the identity of Leptophlebia vespertina or to the fact that it is the species which Westwood had in mind when he estab- lished Leptophlebia. He both mentioned it by name and referred to the figure of DeGeer’s (1771) “‘Ephémere noire a ailes blanches’’ which has been shown by Bengtsson (1912) to be Linnaeus’ Ephemera vespertina. The figures, descriptions, and distributions given by Linnaeus (1758), DeGeer (1771), and Westwood (1840) are all compatible with the present concept of Leptophlebia vespertina. Leptophlebia vespertina is a senior synonym of Leptophlebia meyeri Ea- ton, 1884, and Euphyurus albitarsis Bengtsson, 1909 (see Lestage, 1917, for a fuller discussion of these specific synonymies). Euphyurus albitarsis is the type-species by monotypy of Euphyurus Bengtsson, 1909, making the latter a junior synonym of Leptophlebia as suggested by Lestage (1917). This clarification of the true type-species of the genus Leptophlebia will induce no change in any of the present prevailing concepts of the genus, but may well prevent taxonomic confusion in the future. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Drs. W. L. Peters and D. R. Towns, and Ms. J. G. Peters, all of Florida A&M University, read the manuscript and provided helpful discussion. The research on which this paper is based was supported by a research program (FLAX 79009) of SEA/CR, USDA, to Florida A&M University, William L. Peters, Research Leader. LITERATURE CITED Bengtsson, S. 1909. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der palaarktischen Ephemeriden. Lunds Univ. Arsskr., N. F., Afd. 2, 5(4):1-19. —. 1912. An analysis of the Scandinavian species of Ephemerida described by older authors. Ark. Zool. 7(36):1-21. DeGeer, C. 1771. Mémoires pour servir a l’histoire des insectes. Pars II. Stockholm. Eaton, A. E. 1871. A monograph on the Ephemeridae. Trans. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 1871:1- 164. tN VOLUME 81, NUMBER 2 2 1881. An announcement of new genera of the Ephemeridae. Entomol. Mon. Mag. 17:191-197. . 1883-1888. A revisional monograph of Recent Ephemeridae or mayflies. Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond., Ser. 2, Zool. 3:1—352. Edmunds, G. F., Jr., S. L. Jensen, and L. Berner. 1976. The mayflies of North and Central America. Univ. Minn. Press, Minneapolis. Grandi, M. 1960. Ephemeroidea. Fauna d'Italia HI. Calderini, Bologna. Landa, V. 1969. Jepice-Ephemeroptera. Fauna CSSR 18. Cesk. Akad. Véd, Praha. Lestage, J.-A. 1971. Contribution a l’etude des larves des Ephemeres palearctiques. Ann. Biol. Lacustre. 8:215—458. Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema naturae. Tom. I. Ed. 10. Holmiae. Needham, J. G., J. R. Traver, Y-C. Hsu. 1935. The biology of mayflies. Comstock Publishing Co., Ithaca, New York. 759 p. Peters, W. L. and G. F. Edmunds, Jr. 1970. Revision of the generic classification of the Eastern Hemisphere Leptophlebiidae (Ephemeroptera). Pac. Insects. 12:157—240. Westwood, J. O. 1840. An introduction to the modern classification of insects: founded on the natural habits and corresponding organisation of the different families, Vol. 2. Long- man, Orme, Brown, Green, and Longmans, London. PROC. ENTOMOL. SOC. WASH. 81(2), 1979, pp. 222-229 SEASONAL HISTORY AND DISTRIBUTION OF CARULASPIS MINIMA (TARG.-TOZZ.) INPENNSYLVANIA (HOMOPTERA: DIASPIDIDAE) JAMES F. STIMMEL Bureau of Plant Industry, Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture, Har- risburg, Pennsylvania 17120. Abstract.—The biology and distribution of the univoltine scale insect Car- ulaspis minima (Targ.-Tozz.) was studied at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, dur- ing 1974-75 and its seasonal history compared to that of juniper scale, C. juniperi (Bouche). Fertilized adult females overwintered and began ovipo- sition April 30 and May 23 of the two years studied. Eggs hatched in one week and peak crawler emergence occurred May 30 both years. Second instars appeared June 12, adult males and females, at the end of June. Adult males were most abundant the first two weeks of July, when they fertilized the females then died. The seasonal histories of minima and juniperi were similar. The distribution survey revealed that C. minima infests seven Penn- sylvania counties, mainly in the southeastern portion of the state. The only hosts harboring minima during the survey were Juniperus spp. Natural enemies encountered during the study included the hymenopteran para- sites Aphytis sp., Aspidiotiphagus sp., and Prospaltella sp., and the neu- ropteran predator Aleuropteryx juniperi Ohm. Two species of the genus Carulaspis MacGillivray are found in the United States: Carulaspis juniperi (Bouche), juniper scale, and Carulaspis minima (Targioni-Tozzetti), the so-called minute cypress scale. Both species are believed to be introduced, with Ferris (1937) stating that juniperi is Euro- pean, and King (1902) suggesting minima to be Oriental. Both species are economically important. Naegele (1953) described severe damage to native junipers in Bermuda from exploding populations of juniper scale. In 1975 the number of quarantines levied against both scales on ornamental junipers in Pennsylvania was second only to the number imposed against black vine weevil on Taxus.! In 1958, C. minima was reported heavy on eastern red ‘From the nursery inspection records of the Bureau of Plant Industry, Pennsylvania De- partment of Agriculture, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. VOLUME 81, NUMBER 2 223 cedar, Juniperus virginiana, in Oklahoma (USDA, 1958). Recently, Dekle (1976) recognized that minima is economically important on juniper in Flor- ida. The first record of C. minima from the U.S. is King’s (1902) collection on Thuja in Massachusetts. It has since been recorded from California, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Kansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, and Washington. The identification of this scale in Pennsylvania (USDA, 1974) was made during the initial stages of a study of the arthropod fauna of ornamental juniper by Bureau of Plant Industry entomologists. I had been making preliminary observations on a population of scale thought to be C. juniperi but which I found to be C. minima with the aid of McKenzie’s (1956) key. I began a more detailed investigation of C. minima because of the lack of published information on this species, probably the result of failure by workers to separate minima from juniperi. Also, a survery was initiated to determine its distribution and host range in Pennsylvania. METHODS An ornamental planting of Juniperus chinensis cv. ‘Hetzii’ on the grounds of the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture, Harrisburg, Dauphin Coun- ty, was selected. The planting, about 46 m long by 3 m wide, harbored a heavy infestation of C. minima. Weekly samples were taken from March through October 1974 and 1975. Each sample consisted of a randomly se- lected, scale-infested 15-cm terminal which was cut from the host plant and taken to the laboratory. The first 100 living scale forms encountered (in- cluding eggs) were removed from the host material, mounted five at a time on microscope slides in Hoyer’s medium, and examined through a phase- contrast microscope to determine the stage of each specimen. The stage and sex (except first instars, which were not sexed) of nearly 4,500 specimens were recorded, and the percentage of each stage in the total sample was calculated. Counts of deposited eggs were made by lifting the coverings of adult females and counting the eggs beneath. Most females carried additional undeposited eggs, and these were counted when the slide-mounted speci- mens were examined under phase-contrast. No attempt was made to deter- mine total fecundity of the females since empty chorions were not counted. Male scales and parasites were collected by the mailing tube and glass vial method described by Stoetzel and Davidson (1971). These were labeled and preserved in 70% ethyl alcohol in 2-dram vials. Field observations were in themselves unsatisfactory for determining the number of annual generations. Overwintering females oviposited over a long period, a fact which would obscure oviposition by first generation females, should it occur. The number of generations was determined by transferring 224 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON active first generation crawlers to scale-free hetz junipers (potted 10-inch plants). After these had settled and matured (to first generation adults), they were observed periodically in order to detect any subsequent oviposition, which would indicate the onset of a second generation. The absence of such oviposition would suggest that the first generation adults overwinter. The distribution survey for the two Carulaspis spp. in Pennsylvania uti- lized Bureau of Plant Industry inspectors, entomologists, and the author. Small clippings from Juniperus and Thuja plantings harboring what ap- peared to be juniper scale were taken and delivered to the laboratory in Harrisburg, where specimens were mounted on slides for identification. To compare the seasonal history of C. minima with that of C. juniperi, a nearby population of C. juniperi on J. chinensis cv. “Hetzii from Camp Hill, Cumberland County, was monitored weekly during 1975. Approxi- mately 20 specimens per week were mounted on slides in Hoyer’s medium for phase-contrast studies. SEASONAL HISTORY Fig. 1 Carulaspis minima is a univoltine species which overwinters as fertilized | adult females. In southcentral Pennsylvania, the females began to swell in late March, and eggs could be seen in the bodies of slide-mounted specimens — in the middle of April. Oviposition began April 30 in 1974 and May 23 in 1975, and peak oviposition occurred around the third week of May both years. Deposited eggs averaged 20 per individual, but the total number of eggs probably was more than 35 since slide-mounted females contained an average of 15 undeposited eggs, and empty chorions were uncounted. Most eggs hatched in seven days, although the incubation period ranged from five to eight days. | As the first-instar scales hatched, they emerged from beneath the parent © scales and searched for suitable feeding sites. The crawlers settled in a short time (no crawlers survived more than 24 hours without feeding), inserted — their mouthparts to feed, and became permanently attached to the host. This was the ‘‘settled crawler’ or immobile phase of the first instar. Peak crawler emergence occurred around May 30 both years. Second instars of both sexes began to appear in the samples June 12, two weeks after appearance of active and settled crawlers. The second stadium lasted about two weeks, during which both sexes had developed pygidia. Females attained a turbinate shape with no evidence of eyes, while males became elongate and developed easily visible eyespots. Incorporation of wax secretions into the scale cover began during the second stadium, and seemed to follow that described for C. juniperi by Stoetzel (1976). Female scale covers were usually smooth and circular, while male covers were VOLUME 81, NUMBER 2 NR thr Nn PERCENT IN SAMPLE OLD ADULT FEMALES ACTIVE CRAWLERS [um wea. SETTLED CRAWLERS Bp-=.