PROCEEDINGS OF THE LITERARY AND PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY OF MANCHESTER. VOL. IY. SESSION 1804-06, MANCHESTER : PRINTED BY THOS. SOWXER AND SONS, ST. ANN’S SQUARE. LONDON : H. BATT.LIERE, 219, REGENT STREET. 1865. NOTE. The object which the Society have in view in publishing their Proceedings, is to give an immediate • and succinct account of the scientific and other business transacted at their Meetings, to the members and the general public. The various communications are supplied by the Authors them- selves, who are alone responsible for the facts and reasonings contained therein. » '• ! INDE X. Airy G. B., M.A., F.R.S., Astronomer Royal. — On Auroral Arches, p. 170. Alcock Thomas, M.I). — On Specimens of Foraminifera from Roundstone, Connemara, p. 52. Remains of an Ichtliyosaurus, p. 99. Notes on a Visit to Walton Hall, p. 100. On Marine Entomostraca, p. 174. Southport Natural History, p. 188. Notes on Natural History Speci- mens from Connemara, p. 192. Bates Rev. J. Chadwick, M.A., P.R.A.S., P.G.S. — Raingauge and Anemo- meter Observations, 1864, p. 143. Baxendell J., P.R.A.S., Hon. Sec. — Earthquake of September 25, 1864, p. 1. New Star, p. 22. Period and Changes of the Greenwich Variable Star in Vulpecula, p. 54. Observation of an Auroral Arch, p. 133. On a Thermometer constructed by Dr. Dalton, p. 133. Note on Mr. Bates’s Raingauge and Anemometer Observations, p. 145. Binney E. W., F.R.S., F.G.S., V.P. — Strokes of Lightning, p. 25. Remarks on Marine Shells found at Macclesfield, p. 43. Spores of Plants in Splint Coal, p. 45. Remains of the Elephant found in Derbyshire and Cheshire, p. 49. Internal Structure of Stigmaria, p. 87. Further Observations on the Permian and Triassic Strata of Lancashire, p. 134. Beeguet M. — Consti’uction of Dumas’s Lamp, p. 101. Brierly Henry. — Spinning Machines, p. 2. Brock bank W. — Discovery of the Mammoth (Elephas Primigenius) at Waterhouses, near Leek, p. 46. Brothers A., F.R.A.S. — Photograph of the Moon, p. 13. Portraits by the Magnesium Light, p. 65. Picture of the Blue John Mine taken by the Magnesium Light, p. 112. Was Daguerre a Discoverer ? p. 113. Buxton E. C., Junr. — Photographic Experience in India, p. 120. Calvert F. Crace, F.R.S., F.C.S. — Action of Sea Water upon certain Metals and Alloys, p. 115. Caro Heinrich. — Injurious Action of Alkalies on Cotton Fibre, p. 149. Carrington Benjamin, M.D. — On an Annelidau Larva, and On the Embryology of Annelids, p. 100. On the Chaetopod Annelides of the Southport Sands, p. 176. VI Clifton Prof. R. B., M.A., F.R.A.S. — On mi Acoustical Electric Telegraph, p. 53. Cockle Chief Justice, M.A., F.R.A.S., F.C.P.S. — On Differential Equations, p. 38. Dancer J. B., F.R.A.S. — Contrivance for Regulating the Amount of Light in Using the Microscope, p. 34. Exhibition, Stereoscopically, of Photography on a Large Scale, p. 111. The Opaque Microscope not Neiv, p. 120. Microscopical Appearances of Cotton Hair during Dissolution in the Ammoniacal Solution of Copper, p. 152. On Pseudoscopic Vision through Prisms, p. 157. On Viewing Photo- graphic Pictures taken with Lenses of different Foci, p. 190. Dancer William. — Injurious Action of Alkalies on Cotton Fibre, p. 149. Darbishire R. D., F.G.S. — Notes on Marine Shells found in Stratified Drift at Macclesfield, p. 41. Dyer J. C., V.P. — Spinning Machines, p. 12. Hear John.— Note on the Rainfall of the last Twenty-nine Years at Royton, Oldham, p. 147. Heelis .Thomas, F.R.A.S. — Account of a Fireball, p. 84. Herschel Alexander S., B.A.— On the Auroral Arch of March 20, 1865, p. 171. Heyes W. H. — Markings on Leaves of the Vegetable Marrow, p. 36. Struc- ture of Cotton Fibre, p. 63. Preparation of Canada Balsam for Mounting Microscopic Objects, p. 173. Hunt G-. E. — Discovery of Potamogeton Nitens in Loch Ascog, Rothsav, p. 52. Notes on Mosses, p. 141. Johnson J. R. — Pantascopic Camera, p. 111. Johnson R., F.C.S. — Action of Sea Water upon certain Metals and Alloys p. 115. Joule J. P., LL.D., F.R.S., V.P. — Hardening Steel Wires for Maguetic Needles, p. 28. New Magnetic Needle for showing Rapid and Minute Changes of Declination, p. 37. Testing Boilers by Hydraulic Press- ure, p. 89. New Camera, p. 113. Instrument for showing Rapid Changes in Magnetic Declination, p. 131. Improvements in a Camera, p. 192. Kirkman Rev. T. P., M.A., F.R.S. — Relation of Force to Matter and Mind, p. 14. Corrigenda, p. 28. Theory of Groups, Corrigenda and Ad- denda, p. 171. Knott George, F.R.A.S. — Observations of the Greenwich Variable in Vul- pecula and its Companion Stars, p. 65. vn Latham Arthur G. — Examination of a Shell of Helix Nemoralis, p. 62. Linton James. — Stigmas of Poterium Sanguisorba ; Calyx of Gum Cistus, p. 36. Lund Edward, F.R.C.S. Ex. — On the Points of Resemblance and Difference between the Skeletons of the Gorilla and Man, p. 57. Mitchell John, Captain. — Experiments on Cotton Fibre, p. 51. Mudd James. — A Photographer’s Dream, p. 191. Mylius A. — Action of Caustic Soda on Ethylic and Metliylic Alcohol, p. 106. Nasmyth James, C.E. — Antiquity of the Features and Details of the Lunar Surface, p. 29. On a Large Group of Solar Spots, p. 78. Nevill T. H.— Foraminifera from Gorteen Bay, Connemara ; and a New Method of Mounting Specimens, p. 63. New Sensitive Paper, p. 67. Parry John. — Section of a Shell of Helix Aspersa, p. 62. On Mr. Side- botham’s Camera, p. 67. Pressure Apparatus for Mounting Micro- scopic Objects, p. 174. Robinson John. — Alloy to resist the Action of Sea Water, p. 119. Roscoe Prof. H. E., F.R.S., Hon. Sec. — Mr. Rutherford’s Photographs of the Fixed Lines in the Solar Spectrum, and of the Moon, p. 69. Pre- paration of Bulbs for exhibiting the Chemical Combination of Chlorine and Hydrogen Gases, p. 101. Schunck E., F.R.S., V.P. — On some Products delayed from Indigo Blue, p. 70. Sidebotham J. — Trees damaged by Lightning, p. 25. Address to Micro- scopical Section, p. 33. Seed of Sanieula Europea, p. 36. Printing Transparencies for the Stereoscope and Magic Lantern, p. 65. On the Wotklytype Process, p. 68. Notes on the Development of the Wings of Lepidopterous Insects, p. 98. Proper Focus of Lens to be used in taking Photographic Landscapes, and on some Modes of Measuring the Size of Objects therein depicted, pp. 113 and 190. Smith R. Angus, F.R.S., P. — Dancer’s Aspirator, p. 26. Composition of the Atmosphere, p. 30. On some Physiological Effects of Carbonic . Acid and Ventilation, p. 79. Ou the Meteorological Instruments invented by Dr. Joule, p. 132. Minimetric Method of Analysis, p. 159. Sonstadt Edward. — New Reagent for the Separation of Calcium from Mag- nesium, p. 90. Taylor James. — Rainfall at Oldham, Strinesdale, and Brushes Clough, p. 19. Thom John. — New Form of’ Roof for Dyehouses. p. 103. vni Vernon G. V., F.R.A.S. — Note on the Rainfall of 1864, p. 85. Wardley G-eorge. — On Glass Transparencies, p. 192. Watson John. — On the Plumules or Battledore Scales of the Lycsenidse, p. 98. Williamson Prof. W. C., F.R.S. — Address to the Photographical Section, p. 64. Difficulties in Determining Specific Distinctions in the Lower Forms of Animal Life, p. 140. Worthington S. B., C.E. — Bridge with Girders made of Bessemer Steel Plates, p. 77. Meetings of the Physical and Mathematical Section. — Annual, p. 143. Ordinary, pp. 19, 53, 84. Meetings of the Microscopical Section. — Annual, p. 189. Ordinary, pp. 33, 51, 52, 62, 97, 99, 140, 141, 173, 174, 188. Meetings of the Photographical Section. — Annual, p. 191. Ordinary, pp. 64, 67, 111, 112, 120, 190. Report of the Council. — April 25, 1865, p.'_163. \ PROCEEDINGS 0E THE LITERACY AND PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY. Ordinary Meeting, October 4th, 1864. Edward Schunck, Ph.D., E.R.S., &c., Vice-President, in the Chair. Amongst the donations announced was a bust of Dr. Dalton, presented by Mrs. Samuel Fletcher. On the motion of Dr. Roscoe, seconded by Dr. Joule, the best thanks of the Society were unanimously voted to Mrs. Fletcher, for her very valuable present. The Chairman, in announcing the severe loss which the Society had sustained by the death of their late lamented Honorary Librarian, adverted to the very important services he had rendered. By Mr. Ekman’s able management and indefatigable industry the library had become one of the most valuable in the country. Thomas Windsor, Esq., M.R.C.S., was unanimously elected Honorary Librarian of the Society. Several members stated their experience of the earthquake which occurred on the 26th ult. Mr. Baxendell described a remarkable derangement of the sidereal clock belonging to the corporation, which he had mounted at his house, which has suggested a new method of registering the occurrence of earthquake shocks. Proceedings— Lit, & Phil. Society— Vol. IV.— No. 1— Session, 1864-5. 2 A Paper was read entitled “Remarks on Mr. Dyer’s Paper entitled ‘ Notes on Spinning Machines/ by Mr. Henry Brierly” ; communicated by E. W. Binnf.y, F.R.S. Mr. Dyer, in the abstract of his paper {Proceedings, vol. iii. p. 265), commences by saying that “ two distinct principles were embraced in the inventions of James Hargreaves and Richard Arkwright, which were afterwards combined by Samuel Crompton, to form the beautiful power-driven machine called the mule. Arkwright employed the throstle, or throated spindle, with arms or £ flyers 5 to conduct the threads on bob- bins arranged in stationary frames ; Hargreaves employed naked spindles arranged on a traversing frame or carriage, by which the threads were drawn out (about five feet) in horizontal lines, whilst being twisted, and were then taken up, or wound, on the spindles, to form ‘ cops,’ whilst the carriage returned to the roller beam for another ‘ stretch.’ ” As I understand Mr. Dyer, he attributes to Arkwright the invention of the spindle and flyer, and seems to consider that as the leading ce principle” of Arkwright’s invention, as distinguished from Hargreaves’s invention, the main “prm- ciple” of which he mentions as consisting in the employment of nalied spindles mounted on a traversing frame or carriage. Mr. Dyer is in error on both these points; and it is only fair to a very ingenious inventor who preceded both Har- greaves and Arkwright that these matters should be properly understood. As to Hargreaves’s “ Jenny,” there is no doubt of the originality of the invention, and that Hargreaves is entitled to the sole merit of whatever was valuable in that invention ; hut I shall show that as regards the inventions commonly attributed to Arkwright the case is far different. Before doing so, however, I must point out the mistake committed by Mr. Dyer as regards the nature of Hargreaves’s inven- 3 tion. . Hargreaves did not employ spindles mounted upon a moving carriage , nor was there any (( roller beam ” in his machine at all. Mr. Dyer seems to be here confounding the invention of Hargreaves with the subsequent invention of Crompton. An inspection of the specification of the patent taken out by Hargreaves in 1770 (No. 962) will show that in his “ Jenny ” the spindles revolve in stationary bearings , while instead of rollers for drawing out the material to the requisite fineness a “clasp” was used, which was arranged to move backwards and forwards in suitable framing. Thus, before beginning to spin a “ stretch,” the spinner had the “clasp” near to the spindles, with a certain length of roving between the clasp and each spindle. He then with one hand drew the clasp gently away from the spindles, thus elongating the portions of roving between them, while with the other hand he turned round certain apparatus by means of which the spindles were caused to revolve and twist the threads, and having thus drawn away the clasp for about five feet from the spindles he then returned it back towards them, at the same time guiding the threads by means of a “ presser,” or faller, and turning the spindles round so as to wind the spun threads upon bobbins placed upon them, and not upon the spindles themselves. This is a very different operation from that of the mule, in which rollers moving at different veloci- ties draw the material to the required fineness, while the spindles recede from them in a moving carriage , at the same time revolving so as to twist the threads, which are afterwards wound upon the spindles themselves so as to form “cops.” It is necessary to bear these distinctions in mind in following the progress of development which resulted in the production of the highly effective spinning machinery in use at the pre- sent day. In coming to the consideration of the inventions usually attributed to Arkwright, it is only proper that due notice 4 should be bestowed upon those of a very ingenious man who • preceded him, viz., Lewis Paul. The invention of “ spinning by rollers,” as it is familiarly termed, and for which Ark- wright usually obtains the credit, most undoubtedly origin- ated with Paul. It is only necessary to read the specification of the patent granted to Paul on the 24th June, 1738, to be satisfied on this point. It is true that there has been some dispute as to whether Paul himself really originated the invention described in that specification, a person of the name of Wyatt being mentioned by some as having communicated the invention to Paul, and another person of the name of Highs having laid some sort of claim to the invention. The claims of these parties, however, only rest upon some very vague assertions made by themselves or persons connected with them, such, for instance, as that contained in a letter written by Wyatt to Sir Leicester Holt, and quoted at page 124 of Baines’s History of the Cotton Manufacture , in which W yatt says, referring to the machine known as Paul’s — =° <3> is the symbolical decomposition of (1) or (2). When L and M are any constants whatever, (3), when developed, gives rise to a linear differential equation of the second order reducible to an equation with constant coefficients by changing the independent variable from x to t, where 30 In deducing from (3) its development, the order of the symbolical factors is indifferent, hut the two particular inte- grals of the development are, I think, obtainable by reversing in (3) the order of the symbolical factors. The differential resolvent of every such trinomial cubic as that discussed by Mr. Rawson is soluble by a change of the independent vari- able, and belongs moreover to a comparatively simple form of equation soluble by such change. The theory of Transcendental Solution has led me to the following proposition (theorem) : — If an irreducible algebraical equation of the degree n have a homogeneous linear differential coresolvent of the order m, then any root whatever of the algebraical equation can be expressed as a linear and homogeneous function of any other m of its root. The general demonstration would not be much more diffi- cult than or very different from the particular demonstration of the case m- 2. The converse of this theorem, I believe, is true. In such case let a and b be the particular integrals of the differential resolvent which (since m~ 2) is by hypothesis of the second order only. Let a, [3, and y be any three of the roots of the algebraical equation. Then, since among the values that can be assigned, by means of the arbitrary constants, to the general integral, the roots of the algebraical equation are included, we have three such relations as Aa + D6 = a, Ba + E6 - /3, C a + F b = y, 40 wherein A, B, . . , F are constants. Multiplying the first, second, and last of these equations into the arbitrary multi- pliers X, g, and v , and adding the results, we have (\A + /iB + vC)a + (XD + g E + FF)6 = Xa + yfi + vy (4) Hence if the ratios of any two of the quantities X, g, v to the third be so assigned as to satisfy the equations \A + /tB + rC — 0, XD + /iE + vF = 0, then the sinister of (4) will vanish independently of a and l, and the homogeneous linear relation Xa + /i/3 + vy -• 0 (5) will subsist among the roots a, /3, and y of the algebraical equation. When n~ 3 Ave (since the differential resolvent is homogeneous) have without reference to, but consistently with, the theorem, a + (1 + y — 0 (6) Combining the above theorem with one given by Abel and Galois, we conclude that: — If an algebraical equation have a differential resolvent of the second order, the algebraical equation is resoluble algebraically . Before closing I would add that, as it seems to me, it would be more consonant with the notation and practice of the rule of three, and, therefore, with convenience and the analogies of arithmetic, if by the ratio p : q there were univer- sally understood (not the fraction p + q, but) the fraction 1+P- 41 Mr. R. D. Darbishire, F.G.S., read a paper entitled “ Notes on Marine Shells found in Stratified Drift at Maccles- field,” and exhibited a series of specimens. The specimens were chiefly collected by Mr. W. J. Sainter and Mr. Lowe, of Macclesfield, from sand and gravel exposed in the formation of the new Cemetery on the north side of the town, at an elevation of between 500 and 600 feet above the level of the sea, Unfortunately the buying of specimens had caused the intrusion of many spurious fragments, casting suspicion on several that might after all prove to be genuine. The beds in question were exposed on a south-easterly face, but are now defaced by ballast tips ; consist of fine (running) sand, fine and coarse shingle, and very coarse gravel with large pebbles unscratched ; and, while stratified, in general horizontally, exhibit in their great irregularities of extension, level and false bedding, characteristically marine aspect, as of a sea bottom under the influence of tidal and other varying currents. Below appears the “lower boulder clay” of the Ordnance geologists. The shells are nowhere numerous. Mr. Lowe speaks of finding some in layers. Unfortuuately the shells from parti- cular beds have not been distinguished. In the list specimens obviously spurious have not been noticed. The following species had been identified : — 42 Pholas crispata. Pholas Candida. Mya truncata. Mya arenaria. Psammobia ferroensis. Donax anatinus. Tellina solidula. Mactra solida. Lutraria elliptica. Cytherea chionc. Venus striatula. Artemis lincta. Cyprina islandica. Astarte elliptica. Astaide arctica. Cardium echinatum. Cardium aculeatum (1) Cardium rusticum. Cardium edule. Cardium Norvcgicum. Mytilus edulis. Modiola modiolus. Nucula sp. Area lactea. Pectunculus sp. Pecten opercularis. Ostrea edulis. Patella vulgata. Dentalium cntale. Dentalium Tarentinum. Troclms cinerarius. Littorina littorea. Littorina rudis. Littorina littoralis. Turritella communis. Aporrhais pes pelicani. Natica nitida. JN’atica monilifera. Murcx erinaceus. < Purpura lapillus. Nassa reticulata. N assa incrassata. Buccinum undatum. Fusus gracilis. Fusus antiquus. Trqphon clathratum. Mangelia turricula. Mangelia rufa. Mangelia nebula. Cypnea Europtea. Total, 50 species. Mr. Darbishire compared this list with those of the Moel Tryfaen drift (Caernarvon), and the Kelsey Hill (Hull) fossils, and with several lists of recent faunas of the British 43 Eastern and Western seas, and of seas North and South of the British Isles. The present list was specially remarkable for including Cytherea chione, Cardium msticum, Cardium aculeatum (?), and Area lactea ; all of them shells reaching their highest northern range in the extreme south or west of England and Ireland, a circumstance believed to be new to the history of the so-called “ Drift.” t The Macclesfield list rendered probable the deposit of those beds from the westward, after the period had commenced during which the physical conditions of the Western Sea have differed as they now do from those of the Eastern. A depression of 600 feet would leave only a few islands where Ireland is, would allow of a great extension of the tidal current now narrowed in St. George’s Channel, and would probably carry the warmer influences which are now checked on the West of Ireland to the shores of the Derbyshire hills. Are there any traces of the sea bottom or shores on which the shells of the drift seas lived ? Mr. Darbishire further mentioned his identification in a bed of gravel discovered by Mr. Prestwich, F.G.S., at about 1,200 feet above the sea, on the east side of Macclesfield, of nine species of shells, including Cytherea chione. Mr. Binney, F.G.S., remarked on the extent of the list, the great distance eastward from the present shores of the deposit, the elevation of Mr. Prestwich’s patch, and the peculiarly temperate aspect of the group of shells. This drift could not be called “ arctic.” He also referred to the diffi- culty of recognising distinct “ upper” and “ lower” boulder 44 clays ; and illustrated the partial removal of the drift gravels and the underlying till over a large tract of western country during its elevation, and the re-distribution of portions of the same beds as eroded by water courses after the land had risen above the sea. Dr. Alcock had examined the fossils produced, and especially the southern forms, and confirmed the identification of species. Ordinary Meeting, December 13th, 1864. R. Angus Smith, Ph.l)., F.R.S., President, in the Chair. Mr. Edward Sonstadt was elected an Ordinary Member of the Society. Mr. Binney, F.R.S., exhibited some spores of plants found in the splint coal of Methill, Fifeshire. He said that many years ago he read a paper on some similar fossils before the Geological Society of London, and it was printed in the Journal of the Society for May, 1849. Those specimens were from a nodule found in the King Coal scam at Wigan. They also were met with in the Wigan Four Feet Coal in greater abundance. Since that time Professor Balfour, F.R.S. of Edinburgh, had described, in a paper printed in vol. xx of the Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, some similar fossils from the Fordel splint coal. The specimens exhibited were small lenticular bodies of a chestnut colour, about a line in diameter. They occurred in countless num- bers, indeed forming a very considerable portion of the seam of coal itself. He stated that he had found them in equal abundance in the Eight Feet, Main, Wood, and Pirnie Well seams, but always in the splint or bone part pf the coal. Dr. Hooker had proved that similar spores belonged to the Lepidodendron. The thick coating of the spore has doubtless afforded some protection to it as well as the peculiar process of bituminisation to Avhich splint coal has been subjected, and different from that which soft or cherry coal has under- gone. He said that when we considered the great abundance of these small fossils in all splint coals, and the immense Peoceedings Lit. & Phil. Society.— Vol. IV.— No. 6.— Session 1864-5. 46 number of the roots of Sigillaria found in the floors of such seams of coal, it was almost certain that they had some con- nection with that plant. This tended to confirm M. Adolphe Brongniart’s opinion, expressed many years ago, that Sigil- laria and Lepidodendron were plants very nearly allied to each other. Mr. Binney also exhibited some larger spores in a nodule of clay ironstone given to him by Mr. Ward, of Long- ton, and found in the Derbyshire coal field. These were in a most beautiful state of preservation, and exhibited the tesse- lated character of the outside of the spore. A paper was read by Mr. William Brockbank, “On the Discovery of the Bones of the Mammoth (Elephas primi- genius) in a Fissure of the Carboniferous Limestone at Waterhouses, near Leek.” A considerable number of bones were found at Water- houses some weeks since, but through ignorance of their real character they became dispersed without attracting attention, a good many having been used to manure the land by a neighbouring farmer. A few of these bones reached the author through Mr. Smith, of Chcddleton Mills, and were at once identified as belonging to the skeleton of an elephant. A further search was determined upon, and the author, accompanied by Messrs. Thomas Wardle of Leek, and J. Walsh and W. Smith of Manchester, visited Waterhouses on the 9th instant, and succeeded in finding a large number of bones. Mr. Wardle, tand Mr. Green of the Geological Survey, again visited the place on the 12th instant, and found very decided fragments of teeth. A further search is being made at the present time. A large number of bones were submitted to the Society, all of which were considered to be those of the Elephas primi- genius, amongst which were one humerus nearly complete, and part of the second ; parts of the pelvis and scapula ; one 47 ulna ; several carpal and metacarpal bones ; the bead of the tibia ; several fragments of tusks and two fine fragments of teeth, showing very clearly the peculiar narrow transverse plates and ridges of the dentine and enamel, by which the teeth of this elephant are distinguished. The fissure in which these bones were found occurs in the upper beds of the carboniferous limestone, and has been ex- posed by the workings of a quarry. The limestone strata at Waterhouses are much dislocated, and fissures frequent, the OSSEOUS FISSURE AT WATERHOUSES. river Hamps disappearing in dry weather through fissures very near to the above quarry, and other streams in the immediate neighbourhood were described as sinking in the same manner. The face of the limestone in the quarry is • nearly parallel to the general direction of the valley, or nearly east and west, and the fissure follows the dip and direction of 48 the strata, being nearly vertical, or inclining about 10° to the north. It is about six feet in width from face to face of the solid rock, and is filled up with angular blocks of limestone, cemented together at the sides of the fissure into a solid breccia, the stones being coated with stalagmite, whilst the centre is filled in with angular rubble and damp ochreous clay. The whole had evidently been filled in from above. The bones were recovered in good condition from the breccia on the dryer side of the fissure, but those occurring amongst the damp clay and rubble were so friable that it was quite impossible to save them. Large numbers af ivory flakes were found, which proved to be the remains of the teeth, and one large fragment of too tlx was obtained which was decomposing into these flakes. At the furthest point reached, a very interesting group of bones was discovered, viz., a humerus in the socket of the scapula, with the head of another humerus resting upon it at the other end, and two cervical vertebrae were found near the scapula. These were the only bones found in their relative positions. It was conjectured that the mammoth had fallen into the narrow fissure before it was filled in, its huge bulk preventing its reaching the bottom, so that it remained jammed in until by natural decay it fell to the bottom, bit by bit. By this supposition the absence of the head was accounted for, as it would probably fall off first, and would roll lower down the chasm. This surmise is confirmed by the fact that Mr. Wardle found several fragments of the teeth on his second visit, fifteen or twenty feet below the point where the bones occurred. The author had not been able to find any record of the occurrence of the remains of the mammoth in any work on the geology of Derbyshire or Staffordshire; and Mr. Wardle, who has recently published an interesting account of the geology of the neighbourhood of Leek, believed it to be an entirely 49 new discovery. A considerable part of the fissure remains to be explored, and a further search is being prosecuted by Mr. Wardle and the author. Dr. White considered it probable that among the bones exhibited there were the remains of more than one animal. Mr. Binney said that Mr. Brockbank was mistaken in supposing that no remains of the elephant had hitherto been found in Derbyshire. They had been met with in two locali- ties in the county of Derby and one in the county of Chester. The late Mr. White Watson, at page 58 of his “Delineation of the Strata of Derbyshire,” says : — “ About the year 1663 a large cavern was discovered in sinking for lead ore upon a hill at Balleye, within two miles of Wirks worth ; in which a large skeleton was found, which in the original account of its discovery is said to be £ that of a man, that his brain pan would have held two bushels of corn, and that it was so big they could not get it out of the mine without breaking it.’ Several of its teeth were distributed in the neighbourhood, one of which, with the author’s account of the discovery, is in the writer’s possession. The tooth is ivory, and when com- pared with the dentes molares of an elephant, no difference can be found ; from this circumstance it is evident that the skeleton found could not have been that of a man or giant, so called by the miners, who are ever prone to the marvellous, but must be indisputably that of an elephant, and its capa- cious brain pan a corresponding proof ; for after the miners had conferred on it the appellation of the giant’s tooth, the brain pan must naturally follow the proportions of its bulky owner. The fangs, though perfect at the time of the disco- very, are now broken, and no change appears to have taken place from its original substance. Several of these teeth were brought out, but the skeleton left behind, which, it is to be lamented, cannot now be viewed, that part of the mine having run in, rendering it impracticable without much trouble and expense.” About twenty-five years since the late 50 Mr. James Meadows, of the Ashton Canal Company, pre- sented to the Manchester Geological Society a portion of the tusk of an elephant which he had found in a limestone fissure at Doveholes, near Chapel-en-le-Frith. This specimen is now in the museum of the Society in Peter-street. The late Mr. F. Looney, F.G.S., in his List of Organic Remains, pub- lished with Mr. Elias Hall’s Geological Map, in 1836, in alluding to the fossils found in the “ superficial gravel,” says : “ Part of a molar tooth of the Asiatic elephant was found at Adlington, near Macclesfield, and is now in the possession of William Clayton, Esq.” With these three exceptions he had never heard of the remains of the elephant having been met with in the counties of Derby and Chester, and he felt much obliged to Mr. Brockbank for taking the trouble to col- lect the fine series of remains on the table, and exhibit them to the members of the Society. 51 MICROSCOPICAL SECTION. November 21st, 1864. Joseph Sidebotham, Esq., President of the Section, in the Chair. Mr. Watson exhibited and presented to the Section a dozen slides showing the battledore scales of several species of Polyommatus or Lycsena ; he also illustrated the subject by drawings of the scales made by Mr. Sidebotham. He showed that the scale of Bseticus has manifestly no relation to the others, though this insect is placed at the head of the list of the genus Polyommatus by Boisdudal, H. Schaeffer, Dr. O. Standinger, and W. F. Kirby. Many lepidopterists have thought that it is a Thecla, and he proposed to examine various species of the genus Thecla and to report the result. A letter from Captain Mitchell, of Madras, was read. He stated that he had examined fresh but full grown cotton treated with Mr. O’Neill’s strong and weak solutions of cop- per, and had failed to detect any spiral fibres. He communi- cated some observations on a Lepidopterous larva, probably that described by Mr. Saunders in vol. iii. of the Transactions of the Entomological Society, which attacks the cotton pod. Wherever it was found, the cotton was entirely destroyed. The Secretary read Mr. Edwards’s directions for collect- ing Diatomacese. 52 November 28th, 1864. Joseph Sidebotham, Esq., President of the Section, in the Chair. Specimens Exhibited. Physcomitrium sphoericum, by Mr. G. E. Hunt, found sparingly in three places on the borders of Mere Mere, this being only the second occasion on which it lias been gathered in Britain. The first was thirty years ago, when it was detected in the same place by Mr. Wilson in the autumn of 1834. Four species of Curculionidae, new to Britain, by the President, as exhibited and examined at the Entomological Society, London ; Lixus filiformis and Sibynes canus, Devizes ; Ceuthorhynchidius poweri, Silverdale ; and Peri- telus griseus, Yentnor, Isle of Wight. Three of the species were captured by himself. [See Zoologist, December, 1864.] A martin, entirely white, from Urmstone, by Mr. Linton. Communications. Mr. G. E. Hunt announced bis discovery of Potamogeton nitens in Loch Ascog, Rothsay. This plant was first ob- served as British by Mr. David Moore, Dublin, in a lake near the sea, at Castle Gregory, county of Kerry, in July last, [See Secman’s Journal of Botany, November, 1864.] Thomas Alcock, M.D., read a paper on specimens from Roundstone, Connemara. He exhibited many specimens, including forty-three species of Foraminifcra, two of which were forms of Entosolenia, hitherto undescribed ; also, young shells of Patella vulgata and P. pellucida, Avitli the larval shells still attached and distinctly spiral, evidence not before recorded. 53 PHYSICAL AND MATHEMATICAL SECTION. November I Oth, 1864. Joseph Baxendell, F.R.A.S., President of the Section, in the Chair. Professor Clifton exhibited an acoustical electric telegraph, by which a note, sounded at one end of the line, is reproduced at the other end. He also pointed out the principles involved in the con- struction of this telegraph, viz. : — 1st, The production of a sound whenever a current of suffi- cient strength commences to circulate round an electro magnet, or ceases so to circulate. 2nd, The vibration of a stretched membrane in accordance with a note sounded near it. With respect to the second principle. Professor Clifton drew attention to the fact, that the researches of MM. Bourget and Bernard, in agreement with the mathematical investigations of Poisson and M. Lam6, show that a given square membrane will not vibrate in accord with any note, as stated by Savart. As the same is probably true of circular membranes, such as that used in this telegraph, it follows that only certain notes are capable of being transmitted by one instrument. 54 December 8 th. Robert Worthingto.v, F.R.A.S., y ice-President of the Section, in the Chair. Mr. Baxendell read a “ Note on the Period and Changes of the Greenwich Variable in Vulpecula, No. 1773 of the Twelve-Year Catalogue.” In No. 1500 of the Astronomische Nachrichten, Dr. Schdn- feld. Director of the Observatory at Mannheim, expresses a doubt as to the variability of several of the stars in Mr. Cham- bers’s Catalogue of Variable Stars. One of the objects which he thus points out as doubtful is No. 1773 of the Greenwich Twelve-Year Catalogue, which was entered in Mr. Chambers’s list on my authority, as I had satisfied myself from occasional observations made since 18G1, that its light was subject to periodical changes, though not to the extent indicated by the observations of Messrs. Rogerson andGlaisher, made in 1837. I have since reduced my observations, and have obtained from them the following times of maximum and minimum brightness : — Maxima. 1862, Oct. 20. 1863, Sep. 12. „ Nov 19. 1864, June 15. „ Aug. 21. „ Nov. 8. Minima. 1862, Nov. 24. 1863, Oct. 25. „ Dec. 25. 1864, May 13. „ July 21. „ Oct. 7. Treating the equations formed from these data by the method of least squares, we have, from the observed maxima, Period=67’97 days. Epoch =1864, Feb. 137. And from the observed minima, — Period =67*88 days. Epoch=l864, January P59. 55 The mean of the two values of the period is 67*02 days. The interval, from minimum to maximum brightness, is 30*8 days, and from maximum to minimum 37*1 days. This variable, therefore, like many others, increases in brightness more rapidly than it diminishes. Its magnitude at maximum is 8*8 and at minimum 9*8, the range of variation being, there- fore, one magnitude. It is one of the highly-coloured stars, both Mr. Hind and myself having always noted it as being very red. Mr. Baxkndell also communicated the following “ Obser- vations of the Greenwich Variable in Vulpecula and its Companion Stars. By George Knott, Esq., F.R.A.S.. of Woodcroft Observatory, Cuckfield, Sussex.” 1864, Nov. 5. — I have this evening examined the Green- wich Variable in Vulpecula and its neighbours. The state of the atmosphere was not by any means favourable, and I could not make out c; but a, b, and d were well in view, and b decidedly the greatest of the three. I inclined to estimate b about 12J magnitude ; and by the method of reduced aper- tures I found d~ 12*8 mag. <£=13*0 mag. £=12*6 „ 1773= 9*1 „ The star 1773 is the Greenwich variable ; and d is the new star announced by Mr. Baxendell in his communication in the Society’s Proceedings, No. 2, Session 1864-5. Nov. 22. — I secured a hasty, and therefore comparatively valueless observation. After a hasty glance clouds came up, and I could not gauge the magnitudes as I was preparing to do. My rough results wrere — a=13*0 mag. c, invisible. 5=12*9 mag. d— 13*2 mag. Nov. 26 On this evening I entered in my journal — <( b, 12*9 ; a, 13*0 ; d, 13*2. Is there a minute speck at e?” 56 Dec. 1 . — This evening it is very clear, and I not only see most clearly a small star in the place indi- cated, but also that the star b has a small and pretty close comes ! In the annexed diagram e and f are the new stars. I am not sure of their exact position, but have no doubt of their existence. The follow- ing are my rough estimations of magni- tude: — «, 12-9; b, 12-8; c, 14±; d, 13*1; g © a g 3 S I o « y h, »n «? pH H -£ ag“Vp| .^3.5 2 SQOfcfri §" rtCOOHO) rH rH CT>cot^fr~H« 6 ! C — 'O ,StiS "■3S o S-e is P © jd ■♦» e3 |oS§^J I »f 3M'2f§ P5|9® |°PO&P3Eh 000^ ifltOON rH rH CO » w :o 33 <3 "55 Sg.S ®S| 0^3 o a o fl C3 fr ,2 CD * 3 tig ■Sl'-g <(Ss ooo co in o ssss a -t3 w.si g’l.e !£3 © O ■sii Ph too tlTl-H ..IT-3 il •13 h»| •p h aO d-l|| *cg|| .8 ,Q c3 £ c3 .9 o "a H? O SI 92 1 1^1 M o a gl'S J3.S « ~ J- ,Q 2 ® B ^PoQ M coo Hi CO © .. Q, « © i- © 5W &|s ft) k o -'-fife f!| n1 *• M e— »n h rH O rH m o fr-. CD 8 ^ CO • coo 8& m m S3" o J8 2 c-a S5m |o,g ill Q&-* 3W“ OV 2 Eh ° 3 •a ” B © MEH a « 'rtf; =rt 3 HOOH O •OO • • • • • ooooo CO • CM rH I I • • I NNNOlO co ■ (M -H I till NNN’iHiO -H . .... CO a : Ig . » ©S c3 C3.SW3 © O O © +3 ’a P« in the title S'G^^, for 5223p + 24^92 read 2823p + ^^422 + ^414' Addenda. 4= 1 + 322, Q = l- 6'2 = 1 + 39„p + 8g2, Q = 15. 6'4 = 1 + 6 ^ j2 + 39oj2 + Sg2 + ®23’ Q = 15. 8-4 = 1 + 622^4 + 132< + 124„ Q = 210. 8*4 = 1 + 62’p + 4^2 + + 16^22, Q ~ 315. 8'4 = 1 + 6 92j^4 + 4^2 + ^24 + 13g, Q = 315. 8'4 = 1 + 842 + 5 24 + ^2°-V ®2312 ^8’ Q = 330. 8'8 = 1 + 1 ©22^4 + ®4212 "** 4^2 + ^24 + lGg + 13422> Q = 315. 8’8 = 1 + 4^4 + + ^22^4 + 5g4 + 20^ + ^O^a, Q = 315. 8-6'4 = 1 + ^ 221 4 ^42 13£‘ 32g2^2 + 32^2 + 3423^2 + 1^4pi+ ^®8 + ^^423 * Q = 105. The omission of the above-given groups of 6'2 and 6'4 in my first processes was the main cause of the above errors and defects. 173 MICROSCOPICAL SECTION. March 20th, 1865. J. Sidebotham, Esq., President of the Section, in the Chair. Mr. Dancer read a Paper, “ On the Microscopical Appearances of Cotton Hair during dissolution in the Ammoniacal Solution of Copper.” Mr. Heys, in proposing a vote of thanks, said that he was gratified to fiud that the important subject of the structure of cotton, in which he had himself for some time felt an interest, was now being taken up in a manner likely to clear away all doubts. Mr. Heys said he had been asked by Mr. Dale to introduce to the notice of members a preparation of Canada Balsam for mounting, which has the property of hardening in a very short time. It consisted of Balsam first made perfectly solid by evaporation, and then dissolved in Bisul- phide of Carbon. He found the smell a strong objection to its use, but the results were very satisfactory, the balsam on a slide becoming perfectly hard in a few hours. He thought however the dry balsam might prove to be the more important element in the preparation, and that its solution in Chlo- roform would probably be found to answer all practical pur- poses. Mr. Dancer exhibited many beautiful photographs of microscopic objects by l)r. Maddox. 174 March 27th, 1865. John Parry, Esq., in the Chair. Exhibitions. Sections of various Shells. — Mr. Parry. An apparatus for applying pressure to the cover-glasses of objects freshly mounted in Canada Balsam. It consisted of a dozen small upright pistons placed in a frame, and each furnished with a spiral spring coiled around the rod and pressing against the upper horizontal bar of the frame. Communications. Dr. Alcock exhibited a second time his specimens of shells of Marine Entomostraca, from the coast of Galway. He said that renewed examination of them and the collection of many more specimens had strengthened his belief that, however numerous their forms, they are entitled to be con- sidered as so many distinct species, and he did not think that the general arguments used by Prof. Williamson in support of an opposite opinion at the meeting of February 20th, had any application to their particular case. In the first place it was stated that the outer skin or shells of these creatures is of less value for distinction than the internal parts ; but Dr. Baird had described nine out of his fifteen species from living specimens, and yet in these his specific distinctions are mainly derived from the shells. Again, we were reminded that some of the Entomostraca are known to undergo meta- morphoses, and that this might probably be the case with the genera Cythere and Cythereis ; but Cypris, which approaches very nearly in character to Cythere, does not undergo these changes, and might furnish some ground for the supposition that these Marine Entomostraca also do not ; but it would be sufficient for the present purpose to state that there is no 175 support for the supposition that they do, on the general ground that some kinds of Entomostraca are known to undergo these changes, because it is also well known that other kinds do not. But a further objection was that low forms of animal life are liable to extreme variability, and that the same remark is applicable to the lower groups in the higher divisions of animals, the argument being that in these cases the variability may be so great as to render specific distinctions of little or no value. He felt compelled to state that he did not admit this excessive variability as a certain fact, even in the lowest forms of animal life, until it could be actually proved to be true by most careful observation, and even then he would apply it no further than to the particular cases in which it had been proved ; but as to making it a general rule with the lowest groups of the higher divisions of animals, he saw not the slightest reason for doing so, and here, more than in the former case, the diversity of character in the different groups would render it extremely unlikely that what might apply to one would also be found to apply to another. Even among low forms of animal life such as the Foraminifera, he had searched in vain for examples of that extreme variability which must necessarily confound specific distinctions, and he was sure that every young working naturalist, at all events, would agree with him that a conclusion so discouraging to exact observations as that suggested by Prof. Williamson, ought to be accepted by no one unless he became convinced of its truth by his own painful experience. With regard to the Foraminifera he had no hesitation in saying that, with only a few exceptions, the extraordinary uniformity of character in individuals of the same type was a fact that must strike every observer. In the cases of Miliolina and Polymorphina he would admit there is difficulty, but an examination of many of their numerous forms did not suggest to his mind that a great tendency to variation, in the ordinary 176 sense of the term, would explain their diversity. Knowing, however, from his own observations what is meant by the statement that the Foraminifera are liable to great variation, he was prepared to say that the shells of the Marine Entomo- straca do not at all show this liability ; the forms are clearly defined, and distinct from one another, and intermediate forms blending the characters of two others rarely if ever occur. Then as to the last objection which was brought forward, namely the difficulty of defining what a species is, he believed that practically it might be put aside altogether ; for the fact was that any creature whatever which could be shown to be clearly distinct from all others that had been described must be admitted as a species, and must remain a species until it could be proved to be unworthy of this distinction. In conclusion he would say that he had no strong opinion as to whether this question of what a species is could or could not be answered, but he felt sure that to take Prof. William- son’s suggestion, and merge some ten or twenty of these forms of Marine Entomostraca into one species would be to make it impossible to form even a conjecture of what is meant by that term. A Paper was read “On the Choetopod Annelides of the Southport Sands,’’ by Benj. Carrington, M.D. Amphinomadas. Aphrodite aculeata, L. Found sparingly near low-water mark ; more frequent after storms. Pholoe inornata , Johns. Very rare. Polynoa squamata, Sav. Found occasionally within old shells ; frequent among oysters, and the refuse from the fishing boats. There are two well-marked varieties : a. with a dark-brown crescentic mark on each of the elytra. 177 j3. ochracea, uniform pale orange or stone colour. Polynoa cirrata, Johns. Very rare. P. asterince, sp. nov. Linear-oblong, scales twenty pairs or more, smooth, with a black entire border, seated on each third ring ; intermediate feet cirriferous, bearing at the base a ciliated crest. Upper antennae three, the central one longest.* Not uncommon, occupying the groove between the suckers, of Asterias aurantiaca. I was first led to suspect the presence of some foreign species, by observing a blue phosphorescent light, given off from defined points of the rays, when the star- fish was placed in fresh water. It seems a very sluggish worm, and how it contrives to escape the surrounding suckers, and whether it shares the food captured by the star-fisli, are points yet to be determined. Body one to two inches long, by a line in breadth, posterior segments narrowed, ending in two filiform styles. Peach-blossom, or flesh coloured ; very fragile, so that it is almost impossible to obtain an entire specimen. Scales white, chartaceous, with a narrow black border ; first six pairs placed on alternate feet, the remainder on each third foot, not broader than the body, so that the feet are exposed, easily detached. In a line with the pedicels of the scales, on the intermediate rings, we find on each side a crest-shaped process, ending towards the mesian line in a short papilla. These are ciliated, as are the upper margins of the feet, so * In describing a species, I hare thought it best to follow the nomencla- ture now in use, although I agree with Professor Huxley that a change is desirable. He proposes, after Milne Edwards, that the rings shall be called somites, the head prestomium , central antenna prestomial tentacle, upper and lower lateral antennce superior and inferior prestomial cirri, foot tubercle parapodium, its upper and lower rami notopodium and neuropodium, &c. I think it right also to state, that as my acquaintance with Marine Zoology is rery recent, and I have been unable to consult several foreign works on the subject, I introduce the following species with great diffidence. To the best of my belief they are new to the British fauna, nor havo I been able to identify them with species described by And. and Edwards, Oersted, Gtrube, Ehlers, &c. 178 that horizontal currents are produced, as well as a central one from before backward. The dorsal papillae seem to perform the functions of branchiae. They also contain ova, which the ciliary currents serve to distribute. Feet simple, with seven to ten strong spear-shaped golden setae, apex toothed on one side. Near the dorsum of the foot is a small fascicle, containing four to six short curved toothed bristles. Head concealed, roundish, emarginate. Upper antennae three, the lateral ones very short, two jointed, central one much longer, equal to the two lower antennae. Eyes four, distant. Tentacular cirri twro pairs. Readily distinguished by the long, flesh-coloured body, and marginate, smooth scales. In some young specimens, the black border is absent or ill-defined. P. maculosa, sp. nov. Scales kidney-shaped, smooth, entire, membranous, having a dark curved spot round the centre, seated on alternate feet, intermediate feet bearing cirri ; superior antennae three equal ; ventral surface of pos- terior rings, marked with four black dots. Very rare; only one specimen found in company with P. asterince. The specimen before me, which unfortunately has lost the anal -segment, is oblong-obtuse, slightly narrowed from the middle, breadth two lines, by § inch long. Scales twelve pairs, covering the head and feet, firmly attached, hyaline, especially near the border, which is slightly undulated, * crossed from the inner margin by a retort-shaped black mark. Feet obtuse, obscurely biramous ; upper branch much shorter, the setae short, falcate, and serrate ; lower branch bearing a tuft of twenty to thirty slender, half spear-shaped, oblique, pale setae, toothed on one side, and ending in one or two larger teeth ; shaft long, smooth, terete. Head concealed, round, notched in front ; eyes four, placed on the occipital portion ; upper antennae three equal, two 179 jointed, the central one stout apiculate ; two lower antennae much longer, and exceeding the tentacular cirri. When viewed from the ventral surface, the basal portion of the antennae is nearly black, the three central ones converging like the rays of a tripod, of which the dark-coloured oblong oral opening forms the handle. Posterior segments after the fifteenth marked with four rows of stellate spots. Distinguished from P. asterince by the larger thin trans- lucent scales, which are firmly attached and not bordered, by the more numerous and slender setae, the equal upper antennae, and the absence of the ciliated processes on the dorsal surface. There is no other British species with smooth scales with which it is likely to be confounded. From P. spinifera, Ehlers, (which seems to me identical with Johnston’s P. scabra ,) and from P. peilucicla, Ehlers (Annelid. Chaetop., t. iii. f. 1 — 13), it inay be known by the scabrous cirri and antennae of those species. P. maculata, Grube, seems to be a form of P. cirrata, having the scales garnished with a few large papillae. SigaUon Carringtonii, nov. sp. Body vermiform, obtuse at both ends. Scales very numerous, attached to each ring, pellucid, outer border fringed with pectinate glands ; feet exposed, bifid, densely setiguous. Attached to the pedicel at the base of each foot is a curved ciliated cirrus. Met with occasionally, near low water mark, on the Birk- dale shore, buried in the moist sand, where it lies coiled in a spiral manner. First discovered in July, 1864, when ex- ploring the sands with my friend Mr. C. H. Brown, who named it as above. Body linear, obtuse in front, tapering very gradually to- wards the anal segment, which terminates abruptly in two long styles. Length two to three inches by two lines in breadth. Colour greyish-white, opalescent, reflecting prismatic tints. Feet very numerous, slender at the base, biram ous, upper c 180 branch gibbous at the apex, from which depends a short cirrus, furnished with a dense tuft of long silky setae, fine as spun glass, which arch backward towards the scales, and a lower tuft of jointed ones ; inferior ramus, bearing two kinds of setae, the lower very long and flexible, and the intermediate ones jointed, the blade filiform, rough, articulate like the hair of a mole. Scales smooth, hyaline, persistent, convex, closely imbri- cated, not covering the feet, fringed at the outer margin with a few pectinate-pinnate processes. Some of the anterior scales are seated on alternate feet, but the majority arise from a large ovate tubercle, which is found at the base of each foot. These tubercles are filled with ova, and appear like a white opaque spot through the scales, and from their outer border a stout curved cirrus originates, clothed with vibratile cilia on the lower side, and extending a little beyond the scales. Head small, concealed, hemispherical ; eyes four, minute, the pairs approximate. Upper antennae minute, two on each side, placed at the angles of a broad basal portion, which, like the feet, bears a tuft of silky setae ; lower antennae much longer. The anterior feet exceed the head in length, and project beneath it almost to the median line, so that it is difficult to make out the exact details. Proboscis as broad as long, compressed ; the lips clothed with a row of simple fimbriae ; jaws four, alternate, pointed. The worm is sluggish in confinement, generally remaining coiled spirally like a serpent. Under the lens it is a beautiful object, the long silky setae spreading like the feathers of a bird of paradise — the daintily fringed, translucent scales, through which the ciliated tentacles are seen in constant motion — and the play of prismatic colours on the surface — are sure to excite wonder and admiration. Nereid m. Phyllodoce lamellicjcra , Johns. Rare ; at low water mark 181 buried beneath the sand. It is a beautiful species, swimming freely in sea-water. P. Vittata, Ehlers, Annelid. Chcetopod., 1864, t. vi.f. 7—14. New to Britain. Two specimens appeared in water contain- ing a mass of Sabellaria alveolate from New Brighton, May, 1864 f C. H. Brown J, and I have since met with one or two others at Southport. Distinguished from P. lamelligera hy its smaller size, never more than a line in breadth by two to three inches long, filiform, very active, generally assuming serpentine or spiral curves ; pale olive, convex above, each ring crossed by a narrow, stippled , steel-grey band , about a third of its breadth. Head short, broadly ovate, obtuse ; antennae four apical, spindle-shaped; tentacular cirri four pairs, the two lowest very long (equal to five or six rings). Eyes large, black, crossed behind by the narrow first segment. Branchial leaf- lets ovate, reticulate, parallel with the body ; lower branchiae short obtuse, attached to the base of the feet. Anal segment bearing two leaf-like processes, resembling the branchiae. This active little worm resembles one figured by Sir G. Dalyell, but wants the central antenna. v P. attenuata, sp. nov.? Body very slender, from half a line toa line Troad,~four to six inches long ; anterior rings as broad as long ; branchial leaflet broadly ovate, seated on a pedicle as long as the feet, olive-brown veined ; lower leaflet ovate acute ; middle and posterior rings attenuated, twice as long as broad ; branchiae as wide as the segments over which they arch; feet small simple; bristles cultrate, curved, jointed, finely toothed at the base of the blade. In the shape and relative size of the feet and branchial leaflets it agrees with P. lamelligera , but the disproportionally slender body, and oblong segments, distinguish it at a glance from any form of that species with which I am acquainted. A solitary specimen and a portion of another are all that remain of this curious worm. Unfortunately, both head and 182 anal segment have been rendered indistinguishable by the action of the spirit. y P. Clam , sp. nov. Worm minute, one to two inches long by iVin. to iVin. broad ; rings narrow, depressed, pale drab or greenish ; feet simple, bearing on the upper side ovate tumid branchiae, lying parallel to the body; near the base on the ventral side of the feet short obtuse lower branchial papillse are attached. Rings gradually tapering, and ending in an obtuse anal segment, which bears two clavate solid styles, larger than the branchiae. Head broad at the base, terminating in a thin ornithorhynchus-like snout, apex obtuse ; antennae four, short, divergent. First and second rings half as broad as the rest, giving attachment to four pairs of short tentacular cirri. I am doubtful about the the identity of this Annelid, as I have seen no figure of P. clavigera, Aud. and Ed. Rare, occupying vertical burrows in the sand, about half tide mark. \J Goniada Alcocltiana, sp. nov. Body tapering at both ends, anterior third terete terminating in a conical horn-like snout, posterior segments depressed, broader, channelled above, ending in two long jointed styles. Eyes, and tentacular cirri 0. Proboscis very long, clavate curved, on each side of the base are eight A-shaped dentacles, mouth armed with seven jaws. Body filiform, 1 \ inch long by a line wide, colour reddish brown ; heteromorphous, anterior rings to the 45th, very convex, narrow ; feet minute papillaeform. Lower two-thirds of the worm depressed, rather broader ; feet longer, oblique, from a dilated base, composed of four acute segments, the two outer shorter and divergent (branchial) ; each foot bears two fasciculi of bristles, the upper short curved, arising from the basal portion ; lower composed of long, white, falcate jointed bristles. Apex of the conical snout bearing four minute antennaj, when the proboscis is exerted it stands up like a 183 small horn. Proboscis nearly as long as the terete portion of the body, curved, fluted above, armed with seven minute black jaws, five in the upper and two in the lower half ; middle jaws larger tridentate. At each side of the basal portion there is also a row of minute inversely Y-shaped black dentacles, eight in number. Very rare, only one specimen collected. I have great pleasure in associating the name of Dr. Alcock, who has done so much for the spread of natural science in Manchester, with this curious species. G. maculata, Johns ; the only other British species is distinguished by its greater length, 4 to 6 inches, or, accord- ing to Oersted, 18 to 20 inches; whilst its extreme breadth is only a line and a half! This species, according to Johnson, is destitute of jaws, and Dr. Baird informs me from Oersted’s figure there appear to be no anal cirri. It is distinguished also by having three brown maculae on each segment. In G. Norvegica, Oers., there are eighteen den- tacles on each side of the proboscis. Glycera alba, Lam. A single specimen only obtained among tufts of Anten- naria antennina. Pollicita peripatus, Johns. Several specimens found at the base of Aleyonium digitatum brought from deep water after storms. Scyllis prolifer a. Mull. Probably abundant in wet places, covered with a stratum of mud, but from its minute size easily overlooked. Nereis pelagica, L. N. viridis, L. (2V. cerulia, Penn.) Both these species are abundant in wet hollows, about half-tide mark, occupying a deep burrow in the sand. They vary much in colour, from a deep velvetty green to orange. There is another form, with longer feet, bright orange or flesh-coloured, shaded with olive, which is frequent near high-water mark, where the tide is absent for months together, which may be distinct. 184 N. brevimana, Johns. N. margaritacea, Leach. N. Dumarillii, Aucl. and Edw. These species are found occasionally among oysters dredged from deep water, or the refuse from fishing boats. Nereis bilineata, Johns. Not uncommon. Always found occupying the terminal coils of old whelk shells, and generally those which have been taken possession of by Pagurus Barnhardus. It is one of the handsomest of the Nereids. Nepthys margaritacea , Sars. N. Hombergii, Sav. Common in wet places, buried among the sand. Some specimens are six to eight inches long, and as thick as the little finger. Besides the above species there are several small ones, which I have not yet examined minutely, but which are probably new to Britain. Nerine vulgaris , Johns. I am doubtful whether my specimens belong to this species. N. coniocephala , Johns. Common in damp hollows about mid-tide, along with • Arenicola. It occupies a friable tube, descending a foot or more below the surface. Spio seticornis , Bast. ) S. crenaticornis , Mont.) (Leucodore ciliatus, Johns.) These seem to me to be forms of one species, sometimes excavating a burrow between the laminae of old shells, at others con- structing a sandy tube. S. quadricornis , Lam. Very common below high-water mark, forming a slender cylindrical sand tube ; it has four tentacles, the two lower shorter, and the anal segment terminates in four ovate styles. Branchiarius quadrangu- laris, Mont., seems identical with this worm, but, as Aricije. 185 frequently happens, the specimen had lost the anterior segments. Ophelia coarctata, M. Edwards. One specimen only met with. New to Britain. Mcea mirabilis, Johns. Frequent near low-water mark, in wet places where the sand is intermingled with mud. It bears a close superficial resemblance to the smaller Nemertoid worms, Astemma, &c., and has the same white colour and elastic texture. Dr. Baird informs me there is one specimen in the British Museum, from the coast of Fife. Like myself, he failed to identify it with any known form, and I had named it provisionally y JRhynophylla bitentaculatcr, hut, since this paper was in type, he advises me that it is probably identical with the worm described in Dr. Johnston’s Catalogue, at p. 278, as Mcea mirabilis. As I have not been able to compare it with the description, and it may prove distinct, I append the notes I had drawn up from the examination of living specimens. Prestomial segment leaf-like, ovate, broader than the body, strengthened in the centre by five ribs, ciliated below, margin mobile undulated reticulate. Proboscis cordate, retractile, tumid, shorter than the upper lip, from the lower margin of which spring two long flexible trigonous tentaculae, clothed throughout the inner surface by four to six rows of conical papillEe, resembling the suckers of Asterinse. Eyes and an- tennae 0. Its hold on the sand is so firm that specimens are seldom obtained entire. When creeping through the sand the thin mobile upper lip acts as a wedge, and the turbinate soft pro- bosis is rapidly protruded like a bladder, enlarging the opening. When the surface is reached the head is partially withdrawn, and the two papillose tentacular cirri are directed upwards. Body three to six inches in length, white, opalescent, as 186 thick as a crow quill; segments very numerous, quadrangular, slightly winged, as broad as long, the upper eight a little nar- rower, especially at the base, where it joins the lower portion. In addition to the small transparent branchial laminae on the ventral surface of each of the upper segments, there is an oval appressed scale. Intestine simple, containing sand and mud. Numerous ova are found at the lateral margins of each ring after the eighth. The setae of the eighth segment are very numerous and delicate, resembling in form the pendulum of a clock, while those of the lower rings are stronger, shaped like golf sticks. This worm shows no disposition to swim in water, but remains in one place, with the leaf-like snout curved upwards. The blood is colourless or nearly so, and 1 could make out no circulation as in many worms, but the margin of the snout is covered with a delicate net- work of vessels, and the tentacular papillae are each supplied with a vascular loop. These papillae are depressed at the apex, and supplied with muscular fibres like true suckers, but I have never seen them used to seize any object, or aid in progression. Arenicola piscatorum, Lam. Very abundant. Lumbricina;. Lumbricus lineatus, Mull. Very rare, among surface mud. L. capitatus , Johns. Only one specimen, constricted below the snout. L. pettucidus, Temp. (Clitelis minutus, Temp.) Found within putrid specimens of the heart urchin, and among other rejectamenta of the tide. CaPITIBR ANCHIATA. Pectinaria belgica. Lam. Empty tubes common, living worms occasionally found near loAv-water mark. 187 Sabellaria Anglica , Grube, ( S. alveolata , iSav.^ Very common within shells, especially the whelk. S. Crassissima, Lam. Rare. Terebella conchilega, Pall. Frequent near low water. T. chrysodon Mont. I have found two specimens of a minute species with only eight tentacles, among tubes of sabellaria, perhaps the young of some larger form, they resemble T. ostreata, Dalyell. Ops, gen. nov. f One of the names of Cybele.J Tube slender, strong but flexible when moist, coated with minute, closely imbricated fragments of shell, attached edgewise. Worm terete, of equal breadth throughout (Vo inch). Branchial fans two, terminal, very short, composed of soft, thick, pectinated processes, the apices bifid, obtuse, incurved, surrounding the mouth like a star, not ciliated. Between the fans is a small scoop-like lip. Rings distant, the upper one contracted at the apex, with lateral tufts of setse, much shorter than the succeeding seg- ments, which are six to eight times longer than broad. Ventral surface channelled, on each side of it are pencils of slender setae: and surrounding all but the ventral aspect of each ring, a narrow rough band like a rasp, the surface studded with conical papillae. No lateral hooks. Anal rings narrower, ending in an obtuse point. 0. digitala, sp. nov. Frequent opposite the Whitworth guns, near low tide mark, accompanying species of Terebella. Tube three to four inches long, tapering a little at each end, which is open, as thick as a crow-quill. It has a very neat appearance from the uniform size of the shell fragments. Intestine simple, undulating, filled with mud and sand. Peristome not longer than broad, when closed conical, the T. nebulosa, Mont. T. constrictor, Mont. d 188 fiat, obtuse, fleshy segments curling inwards over the mouth. Colour pinkish. There is a blood vessel on each side of the intestine, but I could trace no circulation in the pectinated fans, which seemed to be used by the worm to collect the grains of sand, &c„ The rasp-like collars, surrounding each ring, are very curious. There is an animal figured by Dalyell, Powers of the Creator, &c., Vol. II., PI. xxxv. f. 4, 5, under the name of clymene borealis, which may be identical with our species, but the peristome is said to consist of 16 to 24 teeth, which are figured as simple and recurved, “ forming a shallow funnel.” This Annelid is /simple in structure and very sluggish, and it bears more resemblance to the Sipunculidce than to the higher worms. In the peristome it reminds us of Chirodota digitata, Esch. From Orthonia it differs in the rasp-like band which surrounds each segment. Sabella ventilabrum. Rare, cast up from deep water after storms Scrpzda triguetra, L. S. contortuplicata, L. Spinor bis communis, Flem. S. lucidus, Mont. S. minuta , Mont. Not uncommon on shells. Attached to sea-weed, some- times abundant. Eccles, April 2, 1865. April 24th, 1865. Thomas Alcock, M.D., in the Chair. Donations. Captain Mitchell of Madras, three slides of Indian Diatom- acese, and contents of seers fishes’ stomachs almost entirely consisting of Diatomacese. Dr. Alcock read a communication on “ Southport Natural 189 History.” He showed specimens of Tellina donacina, Modiola tulipa and Fissurella reticulata found on the shore, also of the large variety of the Solen ensis, some distorted shells of Mactra stultorum and Syndosmya alba. Fissurella reticulata had not hitherto been recorded as a Southport shell. He made some observations on the Natterjack Toads, which were spawning in marshy places among the sand hills, (April 1 8th to 22nd,) exhibiting males and females living, and spawn preserved in glycerine. Mr. R. U. Dakbisiiire mentioned the occurrence of the Old English or black rat in Messrs. Whitbread and Go’s brewery in Chigwell street, London, and exhibited stuffed specimens of male, female, and young. Mr. G. E. Hunt exhibited specimens of a Campylopus allied to C. setifolius, or possibly' a new species. Annual Meeting. May 15th, 1865. Mr. J. Sidebotham, President, in the Chair. The following officers for the ensuing session were duly elected : — IPrcstocnt ARTHUR Gr. LATHAM. Uttc='iprc9it(cnt3. JOSEPH SIDEBOTHAM. R. D. BARBISHIRE, B.A., F.G.S., JOHN D. DANCER, F.R.A.S. treasurer. THOMAS H. NEVILL. Secretaries. H. A. HURST. THOMAS ALCOC’K, M.D. 190 @f tf)E ffiOUlUtl. JOSEPH BAXENDELL, F.R.A.S. JOHN PARRY. W. H. HEYS. W. C. WILLIAMSON, F.R.S., &c. J. G. LYNDE. J. WATSON. G. H. GRINDON. THOMAS COWARD. Donation. Dr. Alcock presented to the Section 24 slides of mounted Foraminifera from shore sand, coast of Galway. A fine stuffed specimen of Osprey, shot at Rostherne Mere, was exhibited by Mr. Harrison. PHOTOGRAPHIC SECTION. April 6th, 1865. H. E. Roscoe, B.A., Ph.D., F.R.S., F.C.S., Vice-Presi- dent of the Section, in the Chair. Mr. J. Sidebotham said that two of the chief points in his paper, read on the 2nd February, were, that lenses either very short or very long in focus did not give true transcripts of nature ; in the long focus the objects in the distance look- ing too near, and in the short focus too distant ; and that lenses of from seven to ten inches focus gave correct per- spective If large pictures were wanted they should be enlarged from negatives taken with a short focus lens. The • second point was, that in all photographs there should be introduced some standard of measure, so that the focus of the lens being known, objects could be approximately measured. Mr. J. B. Dancer remarked that in comparing pictures taken by short and long focal lenses for the purpose of show- 191 ing the errors of perspective, it would be desirable to take into account the angle included in the field of view, the diameter of the stop, and the errors arising from the aberration in the lenses employed. In order to obtain a view of photo- graphic pictures which should approach as nearly as possible to the view seen by the eye, they should be looked at through lenses of corresponding foci to the lenses with which they were taken. Mr. James Mudd read a paper entitled “A Photo- grapher’s Dream,” in which he pointed out that a good picture is not due solely to the process or the apparatus used, but that more was dependent on the careful study of the laws of art, without which it was impossible, except by accident, to produce an artistic picture. Annual Meeting, May 18th, 1865. Joseph Baxendell, F.R.A.S., in the Chair. The Secretary read the annual report, congratulating the members on the success of their first session. The various Papers read at the different meetings were referred to ; the funds were also stated to be in a satisfactory condition. The report was unanimously adopted. The following gentlemen were elected to hold office during the ensuing year : — ^resilient. THE RIGHT REV. THE LORD BISHOP OF MANCHESTER. Utcc=iprcsitjcnts. J. P. JOULE, LL.D., F.R.S., &c. H. E. ROSCOE, B.A., Ph.D., F.R.S., F.O.S JOSEPH BAXENDELL, F.R.A.S. treasurer. THOMAS H. NEVILL. 192 Sccrctarp. LESLIE J. MONTEFIORE. ®OUJUtI. J. B. DANCER, F.R.A.S. E. C. BUXTON. JOHN PARRY. JOHN ROGERSON. JOSEPH SIDEBOTHAM. W.. C. WILLIAMSON, F.R.S., &c. Mr. George Wardley read a paper on “ Glass Trans- parencies/’ in the course of which he detailed the various processes generally in use for printing glass transparencies, dwelling especially on the modification of the taupenot, in which, after coating the plate with collodion, instead of immersing it in the sensitive bath, it is thoroughly washed with water to get rid of the ether and alcohol, and is then coated with iodised albumen ; the remainder of the process is then exactly as the taupenot. The tannin process answered well, but many prints were spoiled in consequence of halation. The best preservatives for printing transparencies were a mix- ture of tannin and honey, or tannin and raspberry syrup, the former giving brown and the latter black tones. The addition of the raspberry syrup to the tannin yielded pictures entirely free from halation. Dr. J. P. Joule, F.H.S., described some further im- provements in his camera, by means of which glass only came in contact with the silver solution. The following paper was read at a meeting of the Micro- scopical Section, held November 28th, 1864 — see page 52 : — “ Notes on Natural History Specimens lately received from Connemara,” by Thomas Alcock, M.D. The series of specimens which I have now to lay before you is so extensive, and I believe so interesting, that parts of it might properly form the material for several distinct com- munications ; but at present 1 propose to show them as a 193 Avhole, and, with the specimens, to hand in as complete lists as I can of the species in each class. The richness of the coast of Galway is well known to every student of British Marine Zoology ; for to whatever branch of the subject he devotes himself he finds alike that here some of his rarest treasures are to be obtained. It is not with the hope of making known to you much that is new that I am led to introduce this subject to your notice, but chiefly because I am convinced that natural history work amongst ourselves is best promoted by the formation of exact lists of the species which we actually know to have been found at some particular localities ; and such lists of Conne- mara specimens, imperfect as they must necessarily be at first, I have now to lay before you. It is however no more than might be expected that in the course of careful examina- tions of so many objects some points have occurred to me which I think worthy of notice, and these I shall mention as I come to them in their natural order. In the first place I have to show specimens of three species of Nullipore — namely, N. polymorpha, N. calcarea, and N. fasciculata; also N. calcarea var. depressa. The list of Foraminifera is an extensive oiie, especially considering that all my specimens are from shore sand and from one locality. This sand is fiorn Dogs Bay, Roundstoue, and consists of many kinds of small shells of Mollusca, among which Rissote and Lacunae are most noticeable at first sight, fragments of Lepralise and other Zoophytes, spines of Amphidotus, and sponge spicula, while the finer parts are made up entirely of Foraminifera. Of these I have found 58 species and named varieties, and also six very distinct forms which are not mentioned in Professor Williamson’s Monograph on Recent British Foraminifera. Specimens of these, and of all the other forms contained in the list are mounted for inspection. In the course of my frequent examinations of these objects 194 I have made a few observations on several of them, which ' may perhaps be interesting. I find Orbulina universa common in the Dogs Bay sand ; that is, I have picked out some hundreds of specimens. They vary greatly in size, the largest being four or five times the diameter of the smallest. They have the surface frosted with larger and smaller tubercles, arranged with a certain kind of regularity, but, though thus rough externally, the texture of the shell does not appear to be arenaceous as stated by Professor Williamson,— at least, if by that term is meant that it is formed of agglutinated grains of sand as is the case with some other species. When examined with a high power and transmitted light, the larger and smaller tubercles show black from their density and the spaces between them are partly occupied by objects like very trans- parent thin plates, of a uniform size and an imperfectly squared figure, the impression these convey being that they have been produced by a kind of crystallization of the material of the shell at the time of its original formation. I conclude that the colourless condition of my specimens depends on the perfect manner in which all animal matter has disappeared, and I think for an examination of the mere structure of the outer case this must be an advantage. It may be interesting to note that among the specimens are a few with one or more protuberances of parts of their surface, destroying the regular spherical figure, and indicating an in- cipient budding before the shell hardened ; there is also one large and very handsome double specimen. Besides the Orbulinas I have an example of another kind of spherical object, which for convenience I will mention here, * Ihough I do not suppose it to belong to the Foraminifera at all. It looks like a sphere of the most transparent glass, and is without colour or markings of any kind. I have found all the forms of Lagena, excepting L. vulgaris typica and L. gracilis. Lagena striata and interrupta are 195 abundant, ; and these, with very few exceptions, have the costse passing- forward to the extremity of the neck, in which case it is only one half of the whole number which do so, each alternate one stopping short at the base. Specimens where the costae wind spirally around the neck are equally common with those in which they take a straight course. These Lagenae have the appearance of old coarse shells, but they do not seem to have suffered from attrition ; they are scarcely ever found with the neck broken short, though it may perhaps be almost equally rare to meet with one absolutely perfect. The varieties — clavata, perlucida, semistriata, and substriata, are comparatively rare, and all of them have forms and charac- ters very distinct from striata and interrupta, while the two latter -agree perfectly excepting in the matter of the costse, which are found in different specimens to be interrupted in a great variety of ways, those with the costse perfectly con- tinuous being the least common ; so that the conclusion I am inclined to come to is, that they need not be separated even as varieties, and that, whatever doubts may remain as to some of the other named varieties, the great abundance of these two and the constancy of their general characters make it certain that together they will form a good species under the name of Lagena striata. A few specimens of this species have a macro at the base, and deformed ones are not uncommon ; these, besides having the body variously mis-shapen, often have the neck bent, sometimes even so much as to give the specimen the form of a retort. The Dogs Bay sand contains many forms of hntosolenia, some of them agreeing with those described by Professor Williamson, but others distinct ; and of these latter I have ventured to name two, which may be described as follows: — 1. Entosolenia Williamsoni, a very abundant form, might pass at first sight for Lagena striata with the neck broken away, but a close examination shows it is a perfect shell, the body like L. striata but rather less full in proportion to its e 196 length than is usual in Connemara specimens, and the tex- ture a little more glassy ; its chief peculiarity however is in the neck, which is short and formed of two distinct portions, the first directly continuous with the body and having an outline similar to that of the lower part of the neck of Lagena abruptly cut short, and the second a cylindrical tube of com- paratively small diameter continued from the middle of it. The first portion is ornamented with three circles of hexa- gonal reticulations, which are continuous below by their inferior angles with the longitudinal costse of the body, and present an interesting combination of the superficial charac- ters of E. costata and E. squamosa. — 2. Entosolenia Montagui is a squamous form, but differs from the named varieties of E. squamosa in having its surface really covered with a pat- tern like scales instead of with raised reticulations. Well developed specimens are not at all flattened, though many are found as if crushed, and they then present an appearance resembling a dried fig. ; the true shape however is a perfect oval, full and well rounded at the smaller end, and from the middle of this projects a short smooth cylindrical tube. With a low power of the microscope, the whole surface of the body appears to be made up of small almost square facets arranged in distinct longitudinal rows, but when these are more highly magnified each flattened surface is seen to rise a little ante- riorly, and to have the front border rounded so as to give exactly the appearance of a covering of scales. So far as I have yet seen the forms of Dentalina and Cristellaria are very rare in this sand, Nonionina Jeffreysii and elegans are also scarce, but Patellina corrugata, which is described as a rare species, is not very uncommon, and some remarkably fine specimens have been met with. All the forms of Rotalina occur excepting two, and there are several undescribed ones in addition ; at present I have seen only one specimen of the rare species, R. inflata. There are two distinct varieties of Globigerina, one with tin' 197 chambers globular, the other having them considerably flat- tened, which gives quite a different character to the shell. Truncatulina lobata is by far the most abundant species, and with Miliolina seminulum, constitutes the chief bulk of the the sand. The two forms of Gassidulina are equally common, and specimens have not been met with presenting inter- mediate links. Polymorphina lactea occurs in profusion, and, though the forms which are distinguished as typica, oblonga, and communis are well marked, a considerable proportion of the whole number of specimens collected seem to indicate an absence of any definite plan in the arrangement of the seg- ments, the chambers being evidently thrown together without order, and in some cases producing an irregular nodulated mass, with two, three, or more distinct and perfectly formed open mouths on different parts of the surface. I find also specimens consisting of nothing more than the primordial segment, and these might be mistaken for a form of Entosolenia globosa but for the peculiar texture of the shell and the radiating grooves around the mouth ; they are worthy, I think, of particular notice, as possibly capable of furnishing some more reliable marks of distinction than are found in adult shells, though at present all I have seen are of one character. The forms of Textularia are numerous, and among them are four which can readily be separated, but may still pass for varieties of T. cuneiformis; one of them however differs considerably in having the texture of the shell much finer, and the chambers full and rounded. Textularia conica is abundant,, and its character, in these Connemara specimens, is so distinct from T. cuneiformis that it seems impossible to admit it as only a variety of that species. In many of the specimens the apex of the cone is broken, exposing always three chambers, which are arranged like a trefoil and are placed almost on the same plane. An examination of the specimens before you of the two 198 forms of Biloculina, named respectively in Professor William- son’s Work, — B. ringens, typica and B. ringens, var. carinata, will suggest, I think, a doubt as to whether it is correct to throw them together as one species, the texture of the shells as well as the form of their mouths being very different. All the named varieties of Miliolina occur in abundance, and among them are great numbers of evidently distorted and misshapen specimens which appear to me to give no help whatever in the way of supplying inosculating forms, but may prove useful by indicating facts bearing on the general development of the animals. Specimens with the last chamber, not broken but clearly left incomplete, are by no means uncommon. Lepralice. — The specimens of many species of Lepraliae which I have to show are from dead shells picked up from the shore of Dogs Bay, and from others dredged at the mouth of Birterbuy Bay. These promise a very rich harvest, and indications of a great number of species are further given by the specimens of detached cells and fragments picked out from the shell-sand, though the latter are generally too broken to serve for exact examination or description. At present I have done very little with the specimens, but can- not altogether omit mentioning them. Lepralia figularis is common, and the specimens are very beautiful ones. There are also many examples of a species nearly agreeing, but not quite identical, with Johnston’s Lepralia ovalis; and Lepralia ciliata var. /3 of Johnston, Mr. Hassall’s Lepralia insignis, is plentiful. There are many other striking forms which I have not yet had the means to identify, besides common ones about which there is no doubt ; but at present 1 must pass over the subject without attempting to give a list. EchinoUerrnata. — The present list includes ten species, and on the table are very handsome specimens of four of these, namely, TTraster glacialis and U. violacea, Luidia fragillissima and Echinus lividus. The acquisition of the two 199 species ef U raster just mentioned, which were not before in the Museum collection, led me to compare them with Uraster rubens, and see if some more reliable distinctions might not be found than the slight differences of proportion and form on which Forbes lays the most stress. The result of this examination is that the strong spines with which the bodies of all three are beset offer at once a clear and simple means of distinction, their character in each species being decidedly different. The spine of Uraster rubens is club-shaped, the base spreading, and irregularly nodulated, the short shaft cylin- drical and smooth, and the head barrel-shaped and beset with longitudinal rows of thin triangular projecting points. That of U. violacea has the basal part rising in the form of a short wide cylinder, crowned with an irregular circle of short spinules, from the midst of which the spine is continued in a conical shape, and near its summit is armed with rows of triangular projecting points like those of U. rubens. While that of U. glacialis has the form of a large strong cone with a very wide base rising from a dense circular bed of small blunt spinules. The apex of the cone appears truncated, and its sides near the top are marked with a few slight serra- tions. Entomostraca. — In the shell-sand from which the Fora- minifera were obtained great numbers of the cases of ento- mostraca occur. Specimens have been picked out of Cy there albo-maculata, angustata, variabilis, flavida, convexa, im- pressa, pellucida, and quadrideutata, the last mentioned species being rather common ; and besides these I have to show mounted specimens of about thirty forms perfectly distinct from one another and from those above mentioned. At pre- sent, however, from want of knowledge of what has been recently done in this subject, I am obliged to pass them over. Crustacea. The collection of Crustacea before you forms 200 in itself a very handsome result of Mr. R. D. Darbishire’s one day’s dredging in Birterbuy Bay, and among the specimens are some choice species, as Eurynome aspera, Ebalia Bryeri and Cranchii and Atelecyclus heterodon. These and indeed all the other specimens, form valuable additions to the Museum collection, which promises soon to become really useful for study and reference. The plan adopted of showing the speci- mens dried, mounted on glass and enclosed in glass-lidded boxes, has been found quite satisfactory, preserving them both from dust and damage by handling, while by properly displaying several specimens of a species in different positions every part may be clearly seen. Mollusca. — The list of Mollusca which I have next to present contains 138 species, including those dredged in Birterbuy Bay ; the others are all beach specimens, collected by Mr. Glover and Mr. Darbishire, or picked out since from the shell sand. The fact that 16 species of small land shells have been found in considerable numbers in the sand, along with the sea shells and foraminifera, may be worth notice; more or less of such an admixture is, I believe, not uncommon, but in the present case the proportions appear to be unusual, and the very great abundance of Helix pulchella is certainly remarkable. It should be mentioned, too, that Mr. Glover has collected from the sandy strip of ground separating Dogs Bay from Gorteen Bay many dead bleached specimens of Helix nemoralis and a few of H. aspersa remarkable for the great thickness and weight of the shells, in consequence of a very excessive deposition of calcareous matter in their substance ; no similar shells in the living state have been found in the neighbourhood, though carefully looked for. As to the sea shells, I shall mention only a few that have particularly attracted my notice. Otina otis was found on a mass of small living mussels brought by Mr. Glover. Ctecum glabrum is very abundant in the sand, and I have picked out 201 some scores of specimens of this shell in the young state with the spiral nucleus attached, besides great numbers of separate spirals ; the intermediate length of tube between the young and the adult state increases rapidly in size, and has a decidedly conical shape, so that the whole length of the shell, if it were to remain entire, would not be so great as might be supposed from seeing only the young and the mature portions. Skenea rota occurs sparingly ; I have seen about half-a-dozen speci- mens. The minute shells which have proved perhaps the most interesting are those of the fry of different species of limpet, four forms of which have been met with ; they are exceedingly abundant in the shell sand, and three of the species have a distinct spiral cap surmounting the apex of the conical part. The series of mounted specimens shows very clearly the several stages of growth to the adult form, and it will be seen that an internal partition is formed by degrees until at last it completely divides the interior of the cone from that the larval cap, which then drops off, leaving a depressed oval scar near the apex. Patella pellucida is at once distinguished by its brilliant greenish-blue marks; it is smooth and has a semi- transparent horn colour, much like that of the adult, though it gives little promise of the elegant shape it afterwards grows to ; the larval cap is large and its spiral character distinct. A second form has so much the appearance of Patella vulgata that I shall venture to call it so. The cap is smaller than in P. pellucida, and the conical shell is opaque and strong, and has radiating ribs and markings of colour resembling the adult P. vulgata ; in this shell the scar left when the cap has fallen is much deeper and coarser than in P. pellucida. A third form, which is much the most abundant in the sand, has a smooth, delicate, colourless shell, sometimes quite transparent, but often partly or wholly opaque ; the cap is always white and has the appearance of a drop of wax on the apex of the cone. In this species the conical shell from its first com- 202 mencement appears to grow uniformly and regularly around the margin of the larval shell, and thus at once becomes a complete cone, while in P. pellucida the growth is at first entirely on one side, forming as it were a very large and expanded outer lip. 1 refer the present shell, though without positive proof, to Acmcea virginea. The fourth limpet-like shell is quite different from those already mentioned, it forms a more depressed cone, and is strong, with a translucent flinty texture, and the surface is marked with numerous fine, equal, radiating ribs. There is no deciduous cap, but the apex of the cone is a little flattened and presents a circular area, which is smooth and glassy, and appears as though a small transparent button were sunk into the substance of the shell. The occurrence of the shells of fry of great numbers of species both of univalve and bivalve mollusca in the sample of sand from Dogs Bay which I am examining, has led me to attempt their identification with the view of obtaining inform- ation as to the characters of some of the larval, or more properly speaking foetal, forms, which have not hitherto been observed. In this inquiry it is necessary to give a more definite meaning to the term “ Fry” than has generally been done, for it appears to have been used indifferently for the foetal shell as it comes from the egg, and for the young which has grown considerably beyond that condition. Shells of the latter kind still show the foetal shell perfectly, and at the same time display characters in the aftergrowth by which at all events the genus, and in some cases the species may be determined, and it is specimens with these double characters that l shall distinguish as fry. At present I will leave the microscopic univalve shells without further notice, except- ing to remark that, while as a rule all foetal shells are smooth and glassy, there are among the univalves some striking exceptions, where the shell is beautifully sculptured, as in 203 some exquisite little specimens apparently the fry of Murex erinaceus. The whole shell (fig. 1) is of a transparent horn brown colour, and is Covered with raised reticulations most gracefully dis- posed ; those on the nucleus are longitudinal and transverse, en- closing minute square depressions ; while on the succeeding whorls they are diagonal in opposite directions, and form diamond-shaped areolae. The bivalves have at present en- gaged most of my attention, and several of them will deserve a short Fig. l. notice. One of the most remarkable shell (fig. 2) which I refer to Anomia. It is trans- parent, and talclike in texture, and is very thin and delicate, so ! as to be almost always found mU j more or less broken at the edges. Its substance is excavated by numerous tubes similar to those is a rj/ii described by Dr. W. Carpenter 7 \ in Anomia, and these tubes ra- -^\}y ,( diate from the edge of the nucleus in all directions to the margin of the shell. The nucleus itself is very glassy and transparent, and is full and rounded in shape, Fig. 2. though still indistinctly triangular. But the singular feature in these specimens is that the growing- shell, which completely surrounds the nucleus in the same way that it does in Ostrea, here leaves a small round hole on each side of the beak — The fry of Ostrea cdulis is common ; the foetal shell also occurs separate, and is readily distin- f 204 guished by having a notch about the middle of the ventral margin and by one of the valves being flatter than the other. — Shells having the form of Pecten are founu in abundance, and about half a dozen kinds have been made out, though at present these cannot be referred to their species, the characters which distinguish them being of a different nature from those found in the adult shells ; for, contrary to what is usually the case, the Pectens grow to a considerable microscopic size before the proper sculpture begins to be formed, and this intermediate growth resembles neither the foetal shell nor the adult in structure. All the young Pectens which have been observed have a rounded shape like P. opercularis, and in all of them the nucleus is smooth, glassy, and transparent, with the valves ventricose and obscurely triangular, like those of Anomia. One form differs from all the others in having the intermediate growth entirely composed of cellular structure, which might lead to a suspicion that it is Avicula, but the general character is strictly that of Pecten. As might be expected from the conditions under which the specimens are found, none are double, and it may be worth mentioning that those with a cellular structure are flat, and, as far as has yet been observed, are all the same valve. The other forms are convex, and have the external surface pitted over with more or less numer- ous deeply excavated depressions of various forms, differently arranged so as to make so many distinct patterns. — Lima sub- auriculata is not uncommonly found of microscopic size, and it agrees with the characters given of the adult, excepting that the strong middle line is externally a furrow and inter- nally a ridge, instead of the reverse. In this shell no dis- tinct line of demarcation is seen between the foetal shell and the aftergrowth. — Crenella presents an unusual case, as shown by the series of mounted specimens, in which the growth is seen to be continued to a considerable size on the plan of the original foetal shell, and then suddenly changes to a totally different character, as has been already observed 205 by Mr. Jeffreys (Brit. Conch , vol. ii. p. 132.) — Area tetra- gona shows a remarkable nucleus, which differs from almost all others I have seen in being amber-coloured or light brown, and it has, scattered over its surface, a few marks which appear like short deeply-implanted hairs. Two species of Cardium have been distinguished, namely C. edule and C. echinatum ; both have the foetal shell smooth, transparent, and globular, but that of C. echinatum is considerably the larger. Several species of Venus have been observed, and in all of them the foetal shell is small, globular, and glassy. The fry of Tapes is characteristic, and the form of it which I have found appears to agree with T. virginea. 1 must pass over many other shells about which there is more or less doubt, and will at present mention only one more, namely Saxicava 7’ugosa, which is the most abundant of all the species in the Dogs Bay sand. The nucleus is very large, glassy, and transparent, and resembles a Cyclas in shape. The fry of this species shows very well how completely the characters of the adult shell are dormant in the foetal state, and how im- mediately they are sometimes assumed with the first growth beyond that condition. In conclusion I have only to say that I trust the results of further examinations of this very rich shore deposit will justify me in having introduced it to your notice, although at present my observations are so slight and imperfect ; and I will further venture to express the hope that the large collection of speci- mens before you may tempt other members of the Section to visit the coast of Galway and make additions to the subjoined lists. LIST OF SPECIES FROM ROUNDSTONE. 1864. Foraminifera. Orbulina universa. Globigerina bulloides, Lagena vulgaris var. clavata. Planorbulina vulgaris. „ var. perlucida. Truncatulina lobata. 206 var. marginata. Lagena \ uJgaris var. semistriata. Bulimiua pupoides, tvpica. » var. striata. „ *var. interrupta » var. substriata. Entosolenia globosa var. lineata. „ costata. „ marginata. » ,, var. lucida. » Williamsoni (N.S.) „ squamosa, typica. » » var. scalarifonnis. » „ var. catenuiata. >> „ hexagona. » Montagui (N.S.) Nodosaria radicula. » Pyrula. Nonionina Barleeana. ,, Jeffreysii. „ elegans. Polystomella crispa. ,, umbilicatula. Patellina corrugata. Rotalina Beccarii. ,, mflata. ,, oblonga. „ eoncamerata. „ mamilla. „ nitida. Ophiura texturata. Ophiocoma rosuia. U raster glacialis. ,, violacea. „ rubens Asterina gibbosa. Uvigerina angulosa. Cassidulina laevigata „ obtusa. Polymorphina lactea, typica. „ „ oblonga. » „ communis. >) myristiformis. Textularia cuneiformis, t}rpica. >) „ var. conica' ,, vanabilis. >i „ var. spathulata. ,, var. difformis. Biloculina ringens, typica. » ,, var. carinata- Spiroloculina depressa, typica. » „ var. rotundata- >, ,, var. cymbium. Miliolina trigonula. seminulum. „ var. oblonga. ,, var. disciformis. bicornis,- typica. >> ,, var. angulata Spirilina foliacea. „ perforata. >> 91 11 If Stenorhynchus phalangium. Inachus Dorsettensis. Hyas coarc tal us. Eurynome aspera. Zantho florida. Echinodermata. Luidia fragillissima. Echinus lividus. Echinocyamus pusillus (in shell sand) Amphidotus (spines in shell sand) Crustacea. Ebalia Penuantii. ,, Bryeri. „ Cranchii. A telecy c 1 u s he terodou . Pagurus Bernhardus. 207 Zantho rivulosa. Cancer pagurus. Carcinus msenas. Portunus puber. „ corrugatus. „ depurator. ,, pusillus. Gonoplax angulata. Vitrina pellucida. Zonites cellarius. „ crystallinus. Helix ericetorum. „ lamellata. ,, fulva. ’ „ pulchella. ,, rotundata. Pupa umbilicata. „ muscorum. ,, Yenetzii. Clausilia nigricans. Zua lubrica. Limnseus truncatulus. Conovulus bidentatus. Carychium minimum. Murex erinaceus. Nassa reticulata. „ incrassata. „ pygmsea. Purpura lapillus. Mangelia nebula. costata. rufa. linearis, attenuata. turricula. Cypreea Europsaa. Lamellaria perspicua. Otina otis. Cerithiopsis tubercularis. V yi >> Pagurus Prideauxii. „ Cuanensis. ,, laavis. Porcellana platycheles. ,, longicornis. Galathea squamifera. Crangon vulgaris. Pakemon serratus. Ligia oceanica. Mollusoa. Trochus ciuerarius. „ magus. „ Montagui. ,, umbilicatus. „ zizyphinus. Phasianella pullus. Ianthina exigua. ,, communis. Puncturella Noachina. Fissurella reticulata. Acmeea virginea. Patella vulgata. ,, athletica. „ pellucida. Dentalium entale. Cylichna cylindracea. „ truncata. . Pleurobranchus plumula. Spirialis Flemingii. Anomia aculeata. ,, ephippium. Pecten maximus. „ opercularis. „ varius. Lima Loscombii. „ subauriculata. Mytilus edulis Area tetragona. Pectunculus glycimeris. Nucula nucleus. Cardium echinatum. 208 Chemnitzia elegantissima. Eulima distorta. Cerithium reticulatum. „ adversum. Turritella communis. Ccecum glabrum. Scalaria communis. Skenea planorbis. ,, rota. Rissoa cingillus. „ labiosa. „ inconspicua. „ parva. „ punctura. „ rubra. ,, striata. „ ulvte. Lacuna vincta. „ puteolus. „ pallidula. Litorina litoralis. „ litorea. „ neritoides. ,, rudis. „ saxatilis. ADDITIONAL LIST Gastrochoena modiolina. Thracia convexa (valve.) „ distorta (living.) Solen siliqua. Solecurtus candidus. Psammobia vespertina. „ -ferroensis. Tellina crassa. „ tenuis. „ solidula. Mactra solida. Tapes decussata. Circe minima (living.) Lucina flexuosa. Cardium fasciatum. „ Norvegicum. „ pygmseum. Lucina borealis. Kellia suborbicularis. Turtonia minuta. Montacuta ferruginosa. Venus casina. „ fasciata. „ ovata. „ striatula. „ verrucosa. Artemis exoleta. „ lincta. Tapes aurea. „ virginea. Lutraria elliptica. Tellina donacina. Syndosmya alba. Saxicava rugosa. ,, „ var. arctica. Lyonsia Norvegica. F DREDGED SHELLS. Modiola modiolus. Crenella marmorata. Area tetragona (living.) Anomia patelliformis. Chiton discrepans. ,, asellus. „ cinerarius. „ cancellatus. Emarginula reticulata. Trochus lineatus. Rissoa Be^nii. Buccinum undatum. Philine aperta. ,, catena.