ee a, UN, har iN) 5 , Prot if - Ys x SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM PROCEEDINGS OF THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM VOLUME 110 NUMBERS 3416-3421 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1960 Publications of the United States National Museum The scientific publications of the United States National Museum include two series, Proceedings of the United States National Museum and United States National Museum Bulletin. In these series are published original articles and monographs dealing with the collections and work of the Museum and setting forth newly acquired facts in the fields of anthropology, biology, geology, history, and technology. Copies of each publication are distributed to libraries and scientific organizations and to specialists and others interested in the various subjects. The Proceedings, begun in 1878, are intended for the publication, in separate form, of shorter papers. These are gathered in volumes, octavo in size, with the publication date of each paper recorded in the table of contents of the volume. In the Bulletin series, the first of which was issued in 1875, appear longer, sep- arate publications consisting of monographs (occasionally in several parts) and volumes in which are collected works on related subjects. Bulletins are either octavo or quarto in size, depending on the needs of the presentation. Since 1902 papers relating to the botanical collections of the Museum have been published in the Bulletin series under the heading Contributions from the United States National Herbarium. REMINGTON KELLOGG, Director, United States National Museum. CONTENTS Gurney, AsHuury B., and Brooks, A. R. Grasshoppers of the mexicanus group, genus Melanoplus (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Eighteen figures and five plates. No. 3416, published July 9, 1959 New subspecies: Melanoplus bilituratus vulturnus. Hanbury, Cuaruss O., Jr. A revision of American bats of the genera Huderma and Plecotus. Twenty-seven figures. No. 3417, published September 3, 1959 Mest: Hersekovirz, Pum. Mammals of Northern Colombia, preliminary report No. 8: Arboreal rice rats, a systematic revision of the subgenus Oecomys, genus Oryzomys. Six figures and twelve plates. No. 3420, published February 24, 1960 New subspecies: Oryzomys concolor bahiensis. Jounson, Puynurs T. The rodent-infesting Anoplura (sucking lice) of Thailand, with remarks on some related species. Seventy-five figures. No. 3421, published November 10, 1959 . pee New species: Enderleinellus corrugatus, Hoplopleura thurmanae, Neohaematopinus callosciuri, N. cognatus, N. capitaneus, N. kinabalensis, N. elbeli, Polyplax cannomydis. Kissinger, Davip G. A revision of the Apion subgenus Trichapion Wagner in the New World (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Nineteen figures. No. 3418, published October 23, 1959 . New species: Apion (Trichapion) bettyae, A. (T.) acanonicum, A. (T.) adaetum, A. (T.) coryi, A. (T.) plectrocolum, A. (T.) ortotes, A. (T.) parcum, A. (T.) eaenum, A. (T.) enoplus, A. (T.) innocens, A. (T.) innocuum, A. (T.) latitator, A. (T.) mirandum, A. (T.) mirificum, A. (T.) evustum, A. (T.) nanulum, A. (T.) subsequens. SHort, J. R. T. A description and classification of the final instar Jarvae of the Ichneumonidae (Insecta, Hymenop- tera). Sixty-four figures. No. 3419, published October 743) %el 215) a Pages 1-93 95-246 513-568 569-598 247-389 391-511 Tir whi fy Afb otis! ’ a” by) PRR PROCEEDINGS OF THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM Vol. 110 Washington : 1959 No. 3416 GRASSHOPPERS OF THE MEXICANUS GROUP, GENUS MELANOPLUS (ORTHOPTERA: ACRIDIDAE) By Asauey B. Gurney! and A. R. Brooxs? INTRODUCTION Since the historic outbreaks of the Rocky Mountain grasshopper (Melanoplus spretus (Walsh)) in the 1870’s, the close relatives of that species, especially the one recently called MZ. mexicanus (Saussure), have been of great economic importance in the United States and Canada. The present study was undertaken to clarify the status of the various taxonomic entities in this complex, and we hope it will stimulate further clarifying studies. We have also attempted to summarize briefly the more important information on the biology of each species. For many years the status of spretus has been a puzzle to ento- mologists because no specimens have been collected since the early 1900’s. Gradually the opinion developed that spretus disappeared because it was the migratory phase of a normally solitary grasshopper, and it was supposed that mezicanus was that species. Our study of 1 Entomology Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture. 2 Entomology Section, Canada Department of Agriculture Research Laboratory, Saskatoon, Saskatche- wan, Canada. 1 477119—59——_1 2 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 the aedeagus indicates that spretus is a distinct species. Any further evidence bearing on this opinion naturally is very desirable. It is chiefly on the basis of the differences in the aedeagus that mexicanus has been found to be distinct from the species commonly misidentified as M. mexicanus by American entomologists. The species most frequently misidentified as mezicanus is M. bilituratus (Walker), and the structure of the aedeagus further suggests that three subspecies merit recognition. Limits oF Group The mexicanus group consists of Melanoplus mezicanus and five closely related species. There are five subspecies in addition to the typical ones. Distribution is limited to North America, from southern Mexico to the Arctic. At this stage in our knowledge of the species groups of Melanoplus, the best that can be offered as a definition of the mexicanus group is a somewhat loose combination of the following characters: 1. Pronotum with hind margin of the dorsal surface produced posteriorly, either broadly angulate or rounded (fig. 15). 2. Tegmina usually covering most or all of abdomen, often extending beyond it, sometimes covering only about a third of the abdomen (pl. 5), but always elongate, never lobate. 3. Male cercus (figs. 7, 8) varying from slender and somewhat rectangular to broadly and irregularly oval. 4, Male subgenital plate tending to develop a dorsal lip at the apex, sometimes posteriorly produced, frequently with twin apical knobs (figs. 11, 16). 5. Dorsal valve of aedeagus anterior to the apical portion of the main stem, usually well sclerotized, more or less concave laterally (figs. 1, 2, 3). Ventral valve of aedeagus relatively short, straplike, its apex usually visible in lateral view near the base of the dorsal valve, dorsad of the accessory lobe. Accessory lobe of aedeagus moderate to large, weakly sclerotized. The name of the mezicanus group is taken from the specific name that has been used most often in the literature in recent years, though, as now restricted, mexicanus is neither the most widely distributed nor the most important species. MM. bilituratus is the most widely distributed, and since the outbreak of spretus ended it has been the most important. Hebard (1935a, p. 57) recognized a borealis group; earlier (1928) he briefly discussed some members of the mexicanus group as he conceived it. It seems to us that the mezicanus group is sufficiently cohesive to be recognized as we are treating it, with borealis included, at least until the group relationships within Melano- plus are better understood. M. femur-rubrum (De Geer), genotype of Melanoplus, has not been included in this group, though the male cercus is very much like that of borealis borealis. The subgenital plate of femur-rubrum is not produced apically as in the members of this group. A distinctive character of femur-rubrum is a small GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 3 spinelike structure (x of fig. 1,2) borne near the base of the accessory lobe of the aedeagus; it does not seem homologous with the lateral projection from the dorsal valve in mezicanus. TABLE 1.—Checklist and index to specific and infraspecific names in the mexicanus group of Melanoplus (Page numbers refer to the present work; synonyms are shown in italics) Name Author and year Original genus Present status affinis (p. 14) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Syn. of bilituratus (Proposed bilituratus as distinct species.) affinis (p. 42) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Syn. of devastator (Proposed as form of M. devastator.) alaskanus (p. 45) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Syn. of bruneri angelicus (p. 14) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Syn. of bilituratus bilituratus arcticus (p. 14) Walker, 1870 Caloptenus Syn. of bilituratus bilituratus ater (p. 41) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Syn. of devastator atlanis (p. 14) Riley, 1875 Caloptenus Syn. of bilituratus bilituratus bilituratus (p. 12) Walker, 1870 Caloptenus Valid species borealis (p. 67) Fieber, 1853 Caloptenus Valid species bruneri (p. 45) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Valid species caeruleipes (p. 52) Cockerell, 1889 Caloptenus Syn. of spretus coeruleipes (p. 14) (Proposed as var. of spretus.) Cockerell, 1888 (Proposed as var. of atlanis.) Melanoplus Syn. of bilituratus bilitu- ratus cockerelli (p. 75) Scudder, 1900 Melanoplus Syn. of borealis stupe- factus consanguineus Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Syn. of devastator (p. 41) conspicuus (p. 42) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Syn. of devastator (Proposed as form of devastator.) defectus (p. 38) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Valid subspecies of bilituratus devastator (p. 41) Scudder, 1878 Melanoplus Valid species diminutus (p. 41) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Syn. of devastator dimidipennis Bruner, 1904 Melanoplus Syn. of bilituratus (p. 15) excelsus (p. 45) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Syn. of bruneri extremus (p. 67) Walker, 1870 Caloptenus Syn. of borealis borealis intermedius (p. 14) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Syn. of bilituratus bilitu- ratus junius (p. 68) Dodge, 1876 Pezotettix Syn. of borealis borealis latifercula (p.75) Caudell, 1903 Melanoplus Syn. of borealis stupe- factus mexicanus (p. 8) Saussure, 1861 Pezotettix Valid species 4. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 TaBLE 1—Checklist and index to specific and infraspecific names in the mexicanus group of Melanoplus—Continued Name Author and year Original genus Present status monticola (p. 68) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Syn. of borealis borealis obscurus (p. 42) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Syn. of devastator (Proposed as form of devastator.) palaceus (p. 78) Fulton, 1930 Melanoplus Valid subspecies of bore- alis parvus (p. 68) Provancher, Caloptenus Syn. of borealis borealis 1876 sapellanus (p. 75) Scudder, 1900 Melanoplus Syn. of borealis stupe- factus scandens (p. 68) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Syn. of borealis borealis scriptus (p. 14) Walker, 1870 Caloptenus Syn. of bilituratus bilituratus selectus (p. 8) Walker, 1870 Caloptenus Syn. of mexicanus septenirionalis Saussure, 1861 Pezotettix Syn. of borealis borealis (p. 67) sterranus (p. 15) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Syn. of bilituratus bilituratus spretis (p. 55) Thomas, 1865 Acridium Unrecognizable; see p. 55 spretus (p. 52) Walsh, 1866 Caloptenus Valid species stupefactus (p. 75) Scudder, 1876 Pezotettix Valid subspecies of bore- alis typicalis (p. 42) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Syn. of devastator (Proposed as form of devastator.) uniformis (p. 41) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Syn. of devastator utahensis (p. 81) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Valid subspecies of bore- alis virgatus (p. 42) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Syn. of devastator vulturnus (p. 25) New subspecies of bili- turatus The species here treated in the mezxicanus group were distributed by Scudder (1897b) in five different “series” of Melanoplus, and M. borealis stupefactus (Scudder) was in the genus Podisma. Those “series” of Scudder are not comparable to the groups of Hebard and other modern workers. ANATOMY OF THE Mare GENITALIA Since the appearance of Hubbell’s (1932) important study, the concealed male genitalia of Acrididae have been utilized for distin- guishing species and subspecies to a considerable extent. Roberts (1941) coordinated the terms for the structures useful to taxonomists with those studied by morphologists, and proposed several new single-word terms. Dirsh (1956) carried the study further, comparing nearly 800 genera and modifying previous terminology by several changes and a number of new terms. GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 5 The male genital mass or assemblage, preferably known as the phallic complex, including the aedeagus and its supporting apodemes, as well as the epiphallus—located anterior to the aedeagus (fig. 2,b)— is situated at the end of the abdomen beneath the supra-anal plate and the pallium (membranous covering usually dorsad of the sub- genital plate). Taxonomically, the aedeagus and epiphallus are the most important organs of the phallic complex, and the critical parts of each are illustrated by M. femur-rubrum (fig. 1,h,%). MetTHODS AND TECHNICS A brief outline of the technic employed in examining the male phallic complex may be helpful. With freshly collected specimens it is a simple matter to slip back the pallium with a dissecting needle, thus exposing the aedeagus. The attaching muscles are easily disrupted sufficiently to permit the phallic complex to be lifted and pulled posteriorly. It is then exposed, attached to the subgenital plate, and is readily visible in the pinned specimen. However, for the most detailed study, removal of the phallic complex and its examination in alcohol are recommended. It may be preserved in a micro-vial, partly filled with glycerine, set at an angle beneath the grasshopper, with the pin passing through the cork of the micro-vial. The dry preparations still attached to specimens are adequate for sorting and for moderately critical study. In the case of dry grasshoppers, sufficient relaxation to permit expo- sure or removal of the phallic complex may be effected either by placing the specimens in a moist relaxing chamber for one or two days, or by dipping the end of the abdomen for a minute or two in water that is coming to a boil. Although very quick, the latter method frequently destroys the natural colors of the hind legs and results in crumpled tegminal apices; so the relaxing chamber is recommended if the future appearance of specimens is important. Because of the difficulty of identifying females to species in some cases, our maps and distribution records, except as noted, are based on males. ‘This practice has eliminated many uncertainties which other- wise would have entered into the distribution plotting for subspecies and for species of similar appearance which occupy the same areas. Lists of localities from which specimens have been examined, or full data on specimens, have been given only where they appear to be of considerable value. Localities are listed roughly in the order that they appear on the map, taken in rows from north to south, beginning in the east. For two or more localities very close together, only one spot is shown on the map. ‘The intensive field work of the junior author in Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and Alberta would, for some species, have permitted the inclusion of an almost solid mass of dots on the map, 6 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 so in those cases only limital and representative localities are shown. Tegmen (front wing or elytron) length is subject to inconsistencies unless a standard measurement is taken. Thus, it is measured “from the distal extremity of the tubercle formed by the junction of the subcostal and radial veins” (Proc. 4th Internat. Locust Conference, Cairo, p. 97, 1937) (also see Dirsh, 1953, for a treatment of standard measurements). We have tried to select specimens with tegminal apices intact, thus avoiding difficulties encountered when the tip of the tegmen is frayed (see Ramchandra Rao, Bull. Ent. Res., vol. 33, pp. 247-249, 1942). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Most of the type specimens are located in the Museum of Compara- tive Zoology (MCZ), the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia (ANSP), and in the U. S. National Museum (USNM). We are much indebted to J. A. G. Rehn (of ANSP) and P. J. Darlington (of MCZ) for the privilege of studying the historical material in their charge, as well as for loans of important series from those collections. The courtesies extended by Mr. Rehn and by his colleague, Harold J. Grant, Jr., on several visits to Philadelphia by the senior author, are much appreciated. It has been especially helpful to examine many of the specimens preserved there which were studied by the late Morgan Hebard. To the following curators we would acknowledge deep appreciation for the loan of critical types or information about them: Max Beier (Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna); N. M. Comeau (Musée de la Province, Quebec); Charles Ferriere (Museum d’Histoire Naturelle, Geneva) ; and David R. Ragge (British Museum). Other entomologists to whom we are very grateful for important loans are: T. H. Hubbell (University of Michigan); George P. Holland (Canadian National Collection, Ottawa); E. S. Thomas (Ohio State Museum); Henry Dietrich (Cornell University); S. W. Frost (Penn- sylvania State University); John R. Hilliard (University of Texas) ; F. W. Werner (University of Arizona); Edwin W. King (Clemson Agricultural College); R. E. Pfadt (University of Wyoming); George E. Wallace (Carnegie Museum); Paul D. Hurd (University of Cali- fornia); Neely Turner (Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Sta- tion); H. V. Weems (Florida Plant Board); B. B. Pepper (Rutgers University); R. D. Bird (Dominion Entomological Laboratory, Brandon, Manitoba); Frank T. Cowan, J. R. Parker and Fred Skoog (U. S. Department of Agriculture, Bozeman, Mont.); O. L. Barnes (U. S. Department of Agriculture, Tempe, Ariz.). Several other entomologists have cooperated in supplying informa- tion or other help, and acknowledgment of their assistance appears in our discussion of the various species. GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 7 Figures 1,a,d,e; 2 (all except f); 9,f,9,k-2; and 15 were made by Arthur D. Cushman, Entomology Research Division, U. 8. Depart- ment of Agriculture. All other drawings and the maps were made by the senior author. Systematic Treatment Key to species and subspecies of the mexicanus group of Melanoplus (Based on males) 1. A distinct mesosternal swelling or ““hump”’ present (fig. 1,d,f,g). . .- . . 2 Without a mesosternal “hump,” or with a weakly developed one (fig. 1,e). 7 2. Dorsal valve of aedeagus (fig. 3,k) of a general circular shape, appearing thin and parchment-like, and with a triangular projection (x of fig. 3,k) on the dorsal rim; subgenital plate usually without twin apices well developed (fig. 11,a-1,2,4,5), occasionally with them distinct (fig. 11,a-3). (Distri- butions figs: 125,015), \spterisbnedens ie esterase . . bruneri Scudder Dorsal valve variously formed (fig. 3,a—-h) but not wath a generally circular shape as in fig. 3,k; subgenital plate normally with well-developed twin apices (fig. 9,f,h-2), best seen in posterior view (fig. 10,uw-z). . .... 3 3. Dorsal valve of aedeagus strongly recurved laterally and posteriorly (fig. 3,a), the hornlike structure heavily sclerotized (pl. 2,p). (Distribution: fig. 14). spretus (Walsh) Dorsal valve (fig. 3,b-f) variously shaped, but not as in opposite category. 4 4. Dorsal valve of aedeagus with a lateral projection (p) from its ventrobasal region (fig. 3,b-1, lateral view; fig. 3,b-2, lateroventral view). (Distribution: figs. 4, 6) . SpE SIe Certo tein tin ute. cis Nenie me mexicanus (Saussure) Dorsal valve without a Tavera projection from its ventrobasal region. . 5 5. Dorsal valve of aedeagus (fig. 3,c) typically produced into a blunt hook or knob at lateroanterior angle (y), especially by a carina (x) which separates main lateral surface from a concave, heavily sclerotized ventroanterior marginal area (z). (Distribution: fig. 6). bilituratus vulturnus, new subspecies Dorsal valve (fig. 3,d-f) without a hook or knob at lateroanterior angle, and without a carina on main lateral surface, though the ventroanterior margin usually recurves as a lip (z of fig. 3,d) . THREE EAR toed tte CS OE + oti 6 6. Dorsal valve of aedeagus appearing inflated, ‘igpiealln ith a concave anterior margin (x of fig. 3,d) and with a sinuate margin (z) of the recurved anterior flap (y), the latter wide. (Distribution: fig. 6). bilituratus defectus Scudder Dorsal valve with little appearance of inflation, without a concave anterior margin, and with a relatively straight margin of the recurved anterior flap, the latter of variable width, often narrow (fig. 3,e). (Distribution: figs. bays: (a) att Ree Caen Ces eae RERUN [rae SR bilituratus bilituratus (Walker) 7. Cercus (fig.7,h) narrow; subgenital plate usually with twin apices (fig. 9,4-2), though variable and occasionally poorly developed (fig. 10,7); aede- agus with apex produced dorsally beyond the base of dorsal valve (figs. 2,k; 3,2); dorsal valve extending primarily dorsoanteriorly. (Distribution: GG TA) po rsd as, (gnats fb bordel yeudartectay ony: «Xb. set devastater'Scudder 8 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Cercus (figs. 7,7; 8,a—e) usually less slender than above; subgenital plate most often without twin apices (fig. 11, b-f); apex of aedeagus scarcely extending dorsally beyond base of dorsal valve (fig. 3,7); dorsal valve extending primarily anteriorly, with a lateral twist. (Distribution: figs. 17,18). . 8 8. Tegmina covering about one-half of abdomen (pl. 5,8,F). (Occurs at very high altitudes; distribution: fig. 18). . . borealis stupefactus (Scudder) Tegmina covering more than one-half & abdomen. ... «ae? Sale 9. Subgenital plate with scarcely any or comparatively little oral or posterior development of the apex (fig. 16,d). (Distribution: figs. 17, 18). borealis borealis (Fieber) Subgenital plate with considerable dorsal or posterior development of the apex (fig. 16,e-g) . . . 3 2 LO 10. Subgenital plate (fig. 16,f; ah 4 nie nee feenanienonels protaced poste- riorly. (Distribution: fig. 18) . . . . borealis utahensis Scudder Subgenital plate (fig. 16,e) erodnced! Honeeiie more than posteriorly. (Ab- domen often conspicuously recurved as in pl. 4,p.) (Distribution: fig. 18.) borealis palaceus Fulton Melaneplus mexicanus (Saussure) Ficursxs 2,c; 3,b; 4; 6; 7,a; 10,f,q; PuaTe 1, Pezotetitiz mexicana Saussure, Rev. Mag. Zool., ser. 2, vol. 13, p. 160, 1861 (male, female, Temperate Mexico). Lectotype, here designated: Male labeled “Cordova, t. c.’’? (printed), a separate green label ‘‘Melanoplus mexicanus Sauss.”’ (apparently in Saussure’s longhand). (Museum d’Histoire Naturelle, Geneva, Switzerland.) Caloptenus selectus Walker, Catalogue of the specimens of Dermaptera Saltatoria in the collection of the British Museum, pt. 4, p. 682, 1879 (female, Oajaca (sic), Mexico). Lectotype, one of two females, selected by Uvarov (1925, p. 298). The condition of the lectotype of mezicanus is good, with all ap- pendages except antennae, right middle leg, and left hind tibia present. It is not an alcoholic specimen, and color is well preserved. Dark dorsal bands on hind femora are well developed, also the pale area of the lower third of the outer paginal area and the pink ventral surface. The hind tibia is deep pink. The aedeagus (dry on specimen) is typical of the species as shown by the series examined. ‘The cercus is some- what less robust than the one from Bledos, Mexico, illustrated (fig. 7,a-1). The mesosternal hump is well developed. Charles Ferriere, curator of entomology at the Museum of Natural History in Geneva, has located 16 specimens (6 males, 10 females) of the original series of mezicanus. He kindly loaned 8 specimens, all bearing green name labels like that above. One female has the same locality label as the lectotype. Two females bear ‘Orizaba, Sumi- chrast,’”’ and one female ‘‘Orizaba, M. H. de Saussure.’’ Two males without locality labels and one female “‘Orizaba, reg. temp. Sumi- chrast”’ prove to be M. femur-rubrum (De Geer), showing that the original series was a mixed one. GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 9 It is probable that the green labels are not original ones, but later ones written by Saussure, since the generic name Pezotettiz is not used. The history of Saussure’s travels suggests that the specimens seen are part of the original series studied by Saussure. Burr’s obituary of Saussure (Ent. Record, vol. 17, pp. 167-170, 1905) records Saussure’s visit to the New World, and mentions an article published by him about the volcano of Orizaba in 1858. This volcano is adja- cent to Cérdoba (spelling now usually followed). Saussure (1870, p. 2) referred to Fr. Sumichrast (one of the collectors of mezicanus types) as his old aide and travel companion. The abbreviation “‘t. ¢.”’ is Spanish for “tierra caliente” (warm region), as indicated by Hebard (1932a, p. 281). However, the specimens may have been taken under temperate conditions, as Cérdoba, about 50 to 60 miles west of Veracruz, in the State of Veracruz, is at the base of Mount Orizaba. The wide variety of zonal conditions encountered when one descends from Mount Orizaba to Cérdoba is mentioned by Goldman (1951, p. 279). Also, Sumichrast, and apparently Saussure too, collected extensively at nearby Mirador (see Goldman, p. 276), and, depend- ing on the detail with which specimens were labeled, some of the original mezxicanus series may have originated there. Five males taken at La Cumbre, near Cérdoba, at an elevation of 6,000 feet, by Dr. H. R. Roberts in 1936, agree perfectly with the lectotype. Uvarov (1925, p. 298) placed selectus in synonymy. A male from Ocotlén, Oaxaca, which is near the type locality of selectus, has been examined by us and is considered typical of mezicanus. Two specimens, male and female (ANSP), from ‘littoral du Mexi- que,’ labeled as ‘‘Platyph. mezicanus Sauss.,’”’ apparently by Saussure, and as paratypes of Platyphymus mexicana Saussure by Hebard, are really Melanoplus mezxicanus. The incorrect name labels may have been prepared accidentally by Saussure; at any rate Platyphyma mexicanum, described by Brunner in 1861, is a very different insect with short elliptical tegmina. Hebard (1932a, p. 281) treated mezi- canum Brunner as a synonym of Pedies virescens Saussure. The two specimens noted probably are the ‘“‘paratypes’”’ mentioned under Melanoplus mexicanus by Hebard (1928, p. 279), since they are stand- ing under M. mezicanus in the Philadelphia collection. Walker’s Caloptenus mexicanus (1870, p. 682) was placed in the synonymy of Platyphyma mexicanum Brunner (there called Paradichroplus mexicanus) by Scudder (1897b, p. 19). The early literature dealing with Melanoplus mezicanus is scanty. Thomas (1873, p. 222) merely listed it (as Pezotettiz mexicana) from Mexico, and he paraphrased Saussure’s description. Bruner (1908, p. 301) stated that he saw specimens of M. devastator which were labeled, probably by Saussure, as Pezotettix mexicana with a query. 10 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Bruner further inferred that Saussure’s type series may have been mixed, and that another included species may have caused Brunner von Wattenwyl (1900, p. 257) to transfer mexicana to Dichroplus. Bruner felt that Brunner must have examined Saussure’s types. We have not seen the material which Brunner recorded from Colombia as Dichroplus mexicanus, but an error probably occurred. Scudder (1897b, p. 404) listed Pezotettizx mexicana as undetermined, but (p. 405) he suggested that it might be the same as Melanoplus atlanas. Kirby (1910, p. 513) correctly placed mezicana near atlanis Riley and spretus Thomas (true spretus, though incorrectly credited to Thomas), but elsewhere (p. 487) placed it in Trigonophymus. ‘The latter placement apparently refers only to the portion of Saussure’s type series which Brunner associated with Colombian specimens. Hebard (1917, p. 271) first brought the name mezicanus into general use when he applied it to the widespread grasshoppers which wenow recognize as a complex, and he placed atlanis of authors in synonymy, though retaining atlanis Riley for a population of eastern United States and vicinity. Descriptive Notes: A small to medium-sized member of the mexicanus group. Head with dorsal carinae of vertex more prom- inent and conspicuous, and closer together at anterior margins of eyes than in bilituratus, especially in male; antenna about one-third longer than head and pronotum combined (male), about equal to combined length (female) ; a small to medium-sized mesosternal hump present in male. MALE GENITALIA: Cercus with extremes as illustrated (fig. 7,a), usually approximating that of figure 7,a-2; furculae slender, taper- ing, usually divergent, about one-third as long as supra-anal plate; subgenital plate moderately upturned in lateral view, twin apices (posterior view) prominent, the intervening depression rather deep and well rounded; dorsal valve of aedeagus not extending dorsad nearly so far as apex of aedeagus, the anterior and dorsal margin covered by a light membrane, a pronounced lateral process (P of fig. 3,6) borne on ventral margin, near tip of ventral valve; accessory lobe large for group, larger than in bilituratus. FEMALE GENITALIA: As illustrated (fig. 10,f,¢); cercus triangular, apex well rounded. Cotoration: General color not distinctive, medium to dark for group, no rich yellow specimens seen. Hind femur with four dark transverse dorsal bands (including knee), inner paginal area irregu- larly tinged with pinkish, followed by solid pink below, outer paginal area dull brownish, paler along ventral margin and at base, ventral surface deep pink; hind tibia variable, either dark pink or ashy greenish gray. GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 11 VARIATION: Seven representative males, measured in millimeters, vary in pronotal length from 3.3 to 4.5 (average, 4.0), in length of hind femur from 9.5 to 13.0 (av. 11.3), and in length of tegmen from 13.2 to 19.0 (av. 16.0). The smallest male is from Atoyac, Mexico, the largest ones from Mt. Alvarez, Mexico, and 18 miles north of Alpine, Tex. Three measured females vary in pronotal length from 4.3 to 5.1 (av. 4.7), in length of hind femur from 12.4 to 13.5 (av. 12.8), and in length of tegmen from 17.0 to 21.0 (av. 18.7). The tegmina of most specimens exceed the hind femur by about the maximum width of hind femur, by somewhat more than that in a few specimens, while in one specimen (north of Tehuacdn) the tegmina reach only to the femoral apices. Most, but not all, specimens collected within the past 20 years have pink hind tibiae, but in most old specimens and a few recent ones the hind tibiae are ash or greenish gray. Apparently some variation occurs in nature, though killing agents and the condi- tions of preservation may be responsibile for some loss of color. The shape of the dorsal valve of aedeagus is variable in dry prepara- tions, due to shriveling. The membrane along the anterior margin then often becomes indistinct and the margin becomes irregular, sometimes indented. The lateral process is of uniform length, for the most part, but is below average length in the male from Alpine, Tex. The dorsal shoulder at the base of the apical ‘‘scoop”’ of the dorsal Ovipositor valve is somewhat variable, occasionally more angular than in fig. 10,q. Distripution: The map (fig. 4) shows the distribution of mexicanus, based on specimens examined. ‘Two lots of Texas specimens have been examined: 4 miles west of Ft. Stockton, Pecos Co., Aug. 8, 1955, J.R. Hilliard (27, 39); in Jeff Davis Co. 18 miles north of Alpine, June 19,1939, F.B.Isely (1¢). Hebard (1917 ;1932a) listed other Mexican lo- calities, but only one Mexican State, Querétaro, additional to those on the map, is represented by those records. Itis probable that all or most localities represented by Bruner’s specimens (1908) were reported by Hebard because he acquired Bruner’s collection of North American Orthoptera. Hebard (1925b) did not report mezxicanus from Sinaloa, but collections from northwestern Mexico, in general, have not been extensive. More collecting is needed to determine the distribution of mexicanus in Texas, but the paucity of records suggests scarcity or localized occurrence. Tinkham (1948, p. 619) had no records other than to repeat the El Paso record of atlanis by Rehn and Hebard (1909). El Paso specimens have not been examined, but they probably represent WM. bilituratus defectus. Biotocy: No detailed information on the biology of mexicanus is available. The data on the specimens examined show occurrence in central Nuevo Leén at altitudes of both 2,200 and 7,000-8,000 feet, 2 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 in Guerrero at altitudes ranging from 5,000 to 8,000 feet, and in Michoacan from 6,000 to 8,000 feet. The series of about 35 Mexican specimens examined includes captures made in all months except January and April, and it is evident that there is more than one generation, perhaps continuous breeding, slowed down by unfavorable local conditions. Melanoptus bilituratus (Walker) This widespread, variable species is represented by most of the material which, in recent years, has been referred to Melanoplus mexicanus mexicanus. Exceptions are specimens now recognized as true MM. mezxicanus, and M. spretus. Specimens of M. bilituratus from the Far West occasionally have been confused with M. devastator, sometimes referred to as M. mezicanus devastator. As mapped by Newton and Gurney (1956-57) (as mezxicanus complez), bilituratus occurs almost throughout the United States, except for peninsular Florida. Our present maps (figs. 5, 6) are based on males the aedeagi of which have been examined to determine the subspecies concerned. While more detailed research may warrant the recognition of a larger number, the material now examined, which is representative of most areas, seems to justify only three subspecies. ‘There is some indication that ecological subspecies, recognized by color and size, do occur, especially in Canada and Alaska (see p. 20). Brooks (1958, p. 20) has recognized these differences by treating atlanis (Riley) as a valid subspecies; however, the senior author doubts the value of applying names to these questionable ecological subspecies at this stage in the study, and atlanis is regarded as a synonym. The reason that the three populations concerned are recognized as subspecies, and not species, is that in each case intergradation in structural characters of the aedeagus occurs. Except for material from ‘Texas, intergrading specimens are here discussed under the appropriate subspecies. Those from Texas are of sufficiently un- certain relationship that it seems best to discuss them in one place. Males from Gainesville and several other Texas localities as listed below are typical or essentially typical of bilituratus vulturnus. Some divergence, in that the carina of the dorsal valve of aedeagus is not well developed, is shown by some specimens from Austin and Wichita Falls. The male from Phantom Lake, Davis Mountains, appears typical of belituratus defectus, but one from nearby Marfa and those from Blanco County, Plainview, Lubbock, and Sweetwater are not typical bilituratus defectus and are best considered intermediates of uncertain relationship. The specimen from Kokernot Mountain, Alpine, Tex., is unusual in that the anterior margin of the dorsal GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 13 x anterior ancora, bridge y projection GpeKnof . 4 Delian, main stem 1 N ! } __ lateral plate ventral valve --~ \ . posterior A accessory — projection lobe cad Ficure 1.—a, Sketch showing location (circle) of mesosternal hump in ventral view of thorax of certain species of Melanoplus. 6, Melanoplus bilituratus bilituratus, female, Medicine Lake, Mont., apical portion of abdomen (z, cercus). c, M. femur-rubrum, female, Poplar, Mont., same view as b. d-g, Males, showing lateral view of mesosternal area in lateral profile: d, M. bilituratus: 1, M. b. oulturnus, Marshall, Mo.; 2, M. 6. bili- turatus, Pullman, Wash. e¢, M. devastator: 1, 2, two specimens from Tulare, Calif. *, M. spretus, Minnesota, Oct. 6, 1876. g, M. bruneri: 1, East Spanish Peak, Colo. 2, Fishers Peak, Colo.; 3, Mt. Moriah, Nev. h-i: M. femur-rubrum, male, Euclid; Minn.: h, dorsal view of epiphallus; 7, aedeagus: 1, lateral view; 2, dorsoposterior views valve is irregular (fig. 3,g); the specimen is not typical of any one of the subspecies, nor is it like the Marfa specimen. Additional material from western Texas is required to determine the relationship of the one or more populations present. Texas males of bilituratus examined are as follows: M. bilituratus vulturnus: Gainesville, Wichita Falls, Quanah, Dallas, College Station, Austin, Wimberley, 2 miles east of Cedar Creek, Bastrop Co. M. bilituratus defectus: Phantom Lake (Davis Mountains). Intermediates of uncertain relationship (M. bilituratus in a broad sense): Blanco Co., Plainview, Lubbock, Sweetwater, Marfa. 14 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 As mentioned under the respective subspecies, the occurrence of two annual generations has been reported for bilituratus defectus, and evidence suggesting two generations or a partial second genera- tion has been presented for bilituratus vulturnus and typical bilituratus. In some cases the evidence consists of a second peak of adult abun- dance during a year. In recent years several important discoveries have been made concerning diapause in the eggs of grasshoppers, as re- viewed by Lees (1955, pp. 7, 46, 68, 127). Further studies may disclose that the subspecies of bilituratus differ with respect to dia- pause. Entomologists frequently have had difficulty distinguishing be- tween the females of bilituratus (in the past usually called mezxicanus or atlanis) and femur-rubrum. With a little practice it usually is a simple matter to separate them by the cerci (fig. 1,6,c), which are much more slender and apically acute in femur-rubrum. Melanoplus bilituratus bilituratus (Walker) Figures 1,b,d-2; 2,e,f; 3,em; 5; 6; 7,f,9,l; 8,3,m; 9,9; 10,9,n; PuatTE 1,8,c. Caloptenus bilituratus Walker, Cat. Derm. Salt. B. M., pt. 4, p. 679, 1870 (male, female, Vancouver Island, Canada; not 2 females, see Uvarov, 1925, p. 298). Lectotype, designated by Uvarov (1925, p. 298): Male from Vancouver Island (BM). Caloptenus scriptus Walker, Cat. Derm. Salt. B. M., pt. 4, p. 680, 1870 (females, Vancouver Island, Canada). Lectotype, designated by Uvarov (1925, p. 298): Female from Vancouver Island (BM). Caloptenus arcticus Walker, Cat. Derm. Salt. B. M., pt. 4, p. 681, 1870 (one female, “Arctic America. Presented by Dr. Rae’’). New synonymy. Caloptenus atlanis Riley, Seventh Ann. Rep. Nox. Benef. Ins. Missouri, p. 169, 1875 (males, females, Boscawen, Merrimack Co., N. H.). New synonymy. Lectotype, here designated: Male labeled ‘‘N. H., type no. 1153, U.S. N. M., Type, Caloptenus Atlanis Riley” (USNM). Melanoplus atlanis, var. coeruleipes Cockerell, Entomologist, vol. 21, p. 301, 1888 (near Templar Rock, Custer Co., Colo.). New synonymy. Melanoplus affinis Scudder, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. 36 (154), pp. 20, 32, 1897; Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, pp. 182, 171-172, pl. 12, fig. 2, 1897. (See Hebard, 1917, footnote, p. 251.) (Males, females, 8 localities in Utah, Wyoming, Washington, and British Columbia.) Newsynonymy. Lectotype, designated by Rehn and Hebard (1912, p. 79): Male from Salt Lake Valley, Utah (ANSP). Melanoplus angelicus Scudder, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. 36 (154), pp. 22, 32, 1897; Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, pp. 133, 202-203, pl. 13, fig. 10, 1897 (2 males, Los Angeles, Calif.). New synonymy. Lectotype, designated by Rehn and Hebard (1912, p. 80): Male from Los Angeles, Calif. (USNM). Melanoplus intermedius Scudder, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. 36 (154), pp. 20, 32, 1897; Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, pp. 132, 172-174, pl. 12, figs. 3, 4, 1897 (males, females, 5 localities in Colorado, Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, and Washington). New synonymy. Lectotype, designated by Rehn and Hebard (1912, p. 79): Male from Yellowstone, Mont. (ANSP). GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 15 Melanoplus sierranus Scudder, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. 36 (154), pp. 21, 32, 1897; Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, pp. 133, 193-194, pl. 13, fig. 1, 1897 (males, females, Lake Tahoe, Placer Co., Calif.; Placer Co., Calif.; Truckee, Nevada Co., Calif.). Newsynonymy. Lectotype, designated by Rehn and Hebard (1912, p. 80): Male from Truckee, Nevada Co., Calif. (MCZ). Melanoplus dimidipennis Bruner, Colorado Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 94, pp. 66-67, 1904 (one male, Fort Collins, Colo.). New synonymy. The unique type of dimidipennis and all lectotypes except those of bilituratus and scriptus have been examined. Uvarov (1925) synony- mized scriptus and also suggested (p. 299) that arcticus may represent M. femur-rubrum (De Geer), but Dr. David R. Ragge (in litt., Feb. 22, 1957) has reported that the cercus of the unique female type of arcticus is much blunter than that of femur-rubrum, and he states definitely that the two names are not synonymous. He has found that except for pale color arcticus agrees very well with an Alaskan specimen of bilituratus which was sent for comparison; the wing lengths of the two specimens are almost identical. Since the Rae specimen described by Walker apparently came from the region of the Mackenzie and Slave Rivers (see Richardson, 1852, p. 476), and specimens of bilituratus from that region agree essentially with the Alaskan ones, we regard arcticus as a synonym. Hebard (1928, pp. 279-280) placed affinis, atlanis, and intermedius as synonyms of M. mexicanus mexicanus; this was done without reference to the aedeagus. Hebard (1929, p. 391) placed dimidipennis as a synonym of brunerz; however, the aedeagus of the type shows that it is belituratus. The type of dimidipennis is small and unusually short-winged, with the external genitalia including features like both bruneri and bilturatus, but not fully typical of either. It probably is an abnormal individual, as Hebard suggested. Scudder (1879b, p. 179) placed coeruletpes as a synonym of atlanis. No type specimens of coeruleipes are known, and since Cockerell (1888) simply applied the name without a formal description to individuals of atlanis (as then so-called) with bluish hind tibiae, and only one nominal form of bilituratus occurs in the area concerned, coeruleipes is relegated to the synonymy. The spelling was given as “caeruleipes’’ by Cockerell (1889). DescrIPTIVE NotEs: A usually medium-sized, fully winged member of the mezicanus group. Head with dorsal carinae of vertex moder- ately prominent; mesosternal hump strongly developed in male, absent in female. MALE GENITALIA: Cercus variable (fig. 7,f), over most of eastern half of range about as in figure 7,f-1; in Utah, California, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and coastal British Columbia averaging nar- rower (fig. 7,f-2-4); in Nevada often decidedly slender, especially from near Reno (fig. 7,f-5-6); furculae about one-third to nearly one-half as long as supra-anal plate, straight or divergent; subgenital 16 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 plate (fig. 10,w) with twin apices usually conspicuous, rarely poorly differentiated. Aedeagus with dorsal valve well sclerotized and with a narrow to rather wide marginal fold, anterior margin usually broadly rounded, rarely with traces of sinuation such as in bilituratus defectus; accessory lobe of medium size for group; epiphallus with lophus rarely showing anterior angulation in lateral view, and then poorly developed, usually erect, in dorsal view the apex of pean broad and semitruncate (figs. 2,e,f; 3,e; 8,7,m). FEMALE GENITALIA: Geneon (fig. 10,9) cae relatively blunt; dorsal valve of ovipositor with “scoop” (fig. 10,n) moderately rounded, the shoulder obtusely angular. VARIATION: The size of 11 representative males, measured in millimeters, varies in pronotal length from 3.4 to 5.1 (av. 4.3), in length of hind femur from 9.8 to 13.7 (av. 11.6), and in length of tegmen from 15.0 to 25.0 (av. 21.1). Eight measured females vary in pronotal length from 3.7 to 5.5 (av. 4.7), in length of hind femur from 12.0 to 14.0 (av. 12.8), and in length of tegmen from 17.0 to 21.0 (av. 18.0). Eastern specimens average smaller than those from the West. Tegminal length is decidedly variable. Unusually long-winged specimens are occasionally encountered. Among them are a female from Doniphan Co., Kans., Sept. 9, 1940, with tegmina reaching 9 mm. posterior to the hind femora, and two females taken in Fergus Co., Mont., Aug. 16, 1940, with comparable measurements of 6.5 and 7.5mm. A series of six females and two males was found dead in a recently baited field at Fort Benton, Mont., July 14, 1940, by Parker and Butcher. The average length of the tegmina extending beyond the hind femora in the females of that series is 5.1 mm., with EXPLANATION OF FIGURE 2 Lateral views of aedeagus, and (b only) dorsal view of aedeagus and epiphallus in natural position within phallic complex. Melanoplus bruneri, Ft. McLeod, Alberta, Canada. mexicanus, Mt. Alvarez, Mexico. mexicanus, Guerrero, Mexico. . bilituratus bilituratus, Placer Co., Calif. . bilituratus bilituratus, Victoria, Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada. . bilituratus, uncertain subspecific position, Guymon, Okla. . bilituratus, uncertain subspecific position, 18 miles north of Alpine, Tex. . bilituratus defectus, Mesilla Park, N. Mex. . bilituratus oulturnus, Stone Mountain, Ga. . devastator, lectotype. M. bilituratus defectus, Casa Grande, Ariz. Melanoplus sp., probably abnormal bilituratus oulturnus, Muscatine Co., Iowa. M. spretus, Nebraska. a, ong ee RESRSSRERS GRASSHOPPERS—-GURNEY AND BROOKS 17 Ficure 2.—Explanation on facing page. 477119—59—_2 18 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 a maximum of 8.5; for the males the average is 8.3, the maximum 11.0 mm. The aedeagus of the shorter-winged of the two males is normal for bilituratus bilituratus, and the cercus is comparatively narrow. The other male, with a wider cercus (fig. 7,g), has the dorsal valve of the aedeagus rather irregular along the lateroanterior margin, but without any indication of spretus. A male with a similarly abnormal dorsal valve was taken in Flathead Co., Mont., July 8, 1917, and its tegmina exceed the hind femora by 5.5mm. Rehn (1952) noted the considerable variation shown by Alaskan specimens. The folded tegmina of some individuals examined by him scarcely surpassed the apices of hind femora, while those of other individuals exceeded the femora by a distance about equal to pronotal length. Rehn and Hebard (1906), under the names intermedius, atlanis, and bilituratus, discussed the variation observed in the cerci and other organs of specimens from various Western States. When recording this grasshopper from Oregon, Fulton (1930) used the name MM. mexicanus bilituratus, and he observed that cerci of males vary from a little less than twice as long as middle width to nearly three times as long as broad. He noted that a series from Malin had consistently narrower cerci than those from other Oregon localities. It is evident from rearing experiments under different conditions of temperature, relative humidity, and food (Parker, 1930) for bilituratus bilituratus (called mexicanus mezxicanus), that size, color, spotting of tegmen, length of tegmen, and color of hind tibia vary in EXPLANATION OF FicureE 3 Except as noted, lateral views of aedeagus drawn from preparations in glycerine. a: Melanoplus spretus: 1, Arapahoe Peak, Colo.; 2, 3, neotype, posterior and lateral views of aedeagus, dry preparation. b: M. mexicanus: 1, 18 miles north of Alpine, Tex.; 2, Durango, Mex., lateroventral view of aedeagus (p, lateral projection). c: M. bilituratus oulturnus: 1, holotype, dry; 2, Priest Bridge, Md. (m, membranous fold; x, carina; y, hooklike apex; z, concave area). d: M. bilituratus defectus, Tempe, Ariz., reared (x, anterior margin; y, flaplike area of dorsal valve; z, sinuate margin of flap). e: M. bilituratus bilituratus, Wasaga Beach, Ontario, Canada. Ff: Intermediate between M. bilituratus bilituratus and M. bilituratus defectus, Baker, Nev., dorsal valve only. g: M. bilituratus, uncertain subspecific position, Kokernot Mt., Alpine, Tex., dorsal valve only. M. bilituratus defectus, Chandler, Ariz. M. devastator, Roseville, Calif. M. borealis borealis, Nachvak Bay, Labrador, Canada. M. bruneri, Mt. Moriah, Nev. (x, triangular projection of dorsal rim of dorsal valve). Same specimen as &, right half of aedeagus in dorsal view. M. bilituratus bilituratus, Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada, same view as J. Se. GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS Ficure 3.—Explanation on facing page. 19 20 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 response to ecological conditions. For these reasons, and perhaps because of genetic factors as well, bilituratus bilituratus shows much diversity in superficial appearance. This is especially evident in regions where a number of comparatively distinct, large, and relatively stable ecological associations occur; such large and diverse areas occur across southern Canada and in the mountains. The junior author has attempted to segregate Canadian specimens on the basis of the above and other external characters. In the southern coastal areas of British Columbia and from Vancouver Island there are small to medium-sized, moderately dark, often more hairy specimens, the tegmina frequently barely covering the abdomen. In most of the interior of southern British Columbia (range lands) specimens of moderate size, more brownish, and with red hind tibiae occur. A single series taken at Westbank, British Columbia, in 1923 includes rather large, predominantly yellowish specimens with the tegmina only about long enough to cover the abdomen. In northern British Columbia, Northwest Territories, and in Alaska the type usually developed is very large, blackish, with reddish hind tibiae, and very long tegmina; obviously of the same type but somewhat smaller are specimens from the foothills of Alberta and from the forested regions of Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba. In the grasslands of southern Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba the predominant type is of moderate size and grayish, with the tegmina extending scarcely beyond the abdomen, and usually with bluish or buff hind tibiae; in the eastern, more humid part of this area (parklands) the form is similar but more brownish and more often with reddish hind tibiae, very like specimens from interior British Columbia. In Ontario and Quebec specimens are nearly intermediate between those from the forested area of the prairie provinces and from the eastern grasslands, usually have red hind tibiae, and are comparatively stable in appearance. In dry years, during periods of grasshopper abundance, and when there is a trend toward swarming, the grassland types of central Canada develop longer tegmina, are of increased size and paler color, and usually have bluish hind tibiae. By and large, in Canada, observations suggest that most if not all major ecological areas have a smaller, grayer, shorter-winged type during “poor grasshopper years’ and a larger, more yellow, and longer-winged type during ‘“‘good grasshopper years.” ‘These differences seem more noticeable in areas which generally are dry than in those where moisture is abundant. Genitalic characters of the populations in different parts of Canada do not differ significantly or consistently enough to warrant, at this stage of our knowledge, the recognition of separate subspecies. It would appear that the superficial appearance of the populations in GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS vA different areas is largely the result of surrounding conditions. Even- tually, studies may show that the recognition of additional named segregates is desirable. The dorsal valve of the aedeagus may have a narrow anterior flap and a rather shallow lateral concavity (figs. 2,f; 3,e), or approach the more swollen type found in intergrades with defectus (fig. 3,f), with wide anterior margin and deep lateral concavity. Practice is re- quired to become familiar with the variation, which apparently is partly individual and partly geographic. A very small male with abortive wings, collected at Clark,;Wyo., Aug. 7, 1937, has the dorsal valve rather stubby, without the usual details, and apparently im- perfect because of the failure of the individual to develop normally. Ficure 4.—Distribution of male specimens of Melanoplus mexicanus examined. The distribution of males of bilituratus bilituratus examined is shown in figures 5 and 6. BIoLoGY AND ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE: The great importance of M. bilituratus bilituratus, which represents the northern subspecies of what usually has been called M. mezicanus or M. atlanis, is well known. Important bulletins dealing with this grasshopper are by Herrick and Hadley (1916) and by Shotwell (1930, 1941). Although crop and range damage occur most often west of the Mississippi River, injury on a smaller scale occurs in the Eastern States. Washburn (1953) described a severe outbreak on two farms near Palmer, Alaska, in late July 1951, in which populations up to 300 per square yard were pap PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 recorded, and vegetables, oats and raspberries were seriously injured. Early July in that locality was the warmest in 35 years, and that condition may have brought about the early maturity and great abundance of this grasshopper. M. bilituratus bilituratus is decidedly migratory at times, and in areas of abundance is usually much more inclined to loose group movements than are most grasshopper species. Parker, Newton, and Shotwell (1955) have described the spectacular flights which in 1938-1940 occurred in North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, and portions of nearby States and Canada. These flights occurred during an outbreak cycle, and a general population increase had preceded the flights. Drake and Tauber (1946) discussed flights which entered Towa from the west in 1941 and earlier years. Corkins (1922) reported on extensive flights in 1920, mainly in Bottineau and Renville Counties, N. Dak., and he noted their re- semblance to the historic flights of spretus. By the use of an airplane one heavy swarm was examined and found to be most dense at an altitude of 500-800 feet, with a few individuals at 1,650 feet. Nymphs as well as adults occasionally migrate (Parker, et al., 1955, p. 16; Shotwell, 1930, p. 24). Early papers (Herrick and Hadley, 1916; Shotwell, 1930) gave the impression that bilituratus bilituratus is almost omnivorous in its food habits. In recent years, however, entomologists have become keenly aware that many grasshoppers are far from being the general feeders which they were once thought to be, and several investigations Figure 5.—Distribution of male specimens of Melanoplus bilituratus bilituratus examined from Alaska and Canada. GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 23 suggest that bilituratus bilituratus has definite responses and prefer- ences concerning food plants. In cage studies conducted in eastern Wyoming, Pfadt (1949) found that adults preferred dandelion and wheat to all other plants which he tested, that tansymustard and dandelion gave the most nymphal growth, and that dandelion, wheat, and tansymustard were most favorable to egg production. In Manitoba, Smith, Hanford, and Chefurka (1952) fed certain plants through three successive generations (in cages) and recorded survival, rate of development, and the number of eggs laid. They found that wheat, barley, and dandelion were the most favorable food plants, and that Russian thistle and alfalfa were the least favorable. How- ever, Anderson and Wright (1952) found during Montana field studies that feeding occurred on a wide variety of plants, representing a wider host range than suggested by Pfadt’s cage studies. Hebard (1929, p. 391) recorded a pair of Melanoplus (probably bilituratus bilituratus) from Perth, Nev., which were very small, with malformed, reduced wings. They occurred in alfalfa and, although normal specimens were abundant, perhaps the pair in question fed entirely or mainly on alfalfa. Scharff (1954) reviewed the effects of food plants and weather. Environments occupied by bilituratus bilituratus are extremely variable, Hebard (1925a, p. 112) stating that it (alanis) ‘‘is equally at home in weedy waste land or on the sage-brush plains, its environment having a very decided effect on its general appearance.’’ The general preference for light, sandy soils has been mentioned by Morse (1920). In the grain belt (Shotwell, 1930) it frequents fence row areas and wheat-stubble fields, especially where Russian thistle grows. In southern Michigan, Cantrall (1943) concluded that this grasshopper is characteristic of, and prefers, a mixed grass-herbaceous habitat, and that in many other environments where the grasshopper appears it probably is a sporadic member of the fauna, since it wanders a great deal. Altitudinally, the range of bilituratus bilituratus captures extends from sea level in many places to the Alpine Zone (see Alexander, 1951, pp. 107-108, for critical comments on occurrence in the Alpine Zone of Colorado, also notes by Gurney, 1953, p. 317). Through the courtesy of Dr. George E. Wallace, Carnegie Museum, we have examined a rather long-winged male of bilituratus bilituratus taken by the late Dr. Walter Sweadner, Aug. 9, 1932, at an altitude of 7,200 feet, imbedded in the Sperry Glacier, Glacier National Park, Mont. No further details are available. In New England bilituratus bilituratus occurs from the seashore to the summits of the highest mountains (Morse, 1920). Some altitudes on the labels of specimens examined are as follows: Junction of Moose VOL. 110 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM 24 *BaITI[BDO] soqv1g PeHUp) Woy poulurexs snjoinjrrg “PY pur snuvrixau snjfouvjray JO suowttoads ayeus JO UOIINqIIsIG—9 TANI "OU uoyjisod oj1oedsqns UuiDpsaoun yo snyoanyiig SNUANINA— SNyoOINyiyhIq SOJOIPAWAajUI SNyOayap—SnjosnjI IgG SNyoajep snyosnyiyig * SNJOIN| IG SNyoINyLIIG ° snupoixaw * GRASSHOPPERS—-GURNEY AND BROOKS 25 Pass-Hope Highway and Moose Pass-Kenai Highway, Alaska, 1,800 ft.; Signal Peak, Wash., 5,000 ft.; Wasatch Mts., Utah, 7,400 ft.; Chaffee Co., Colo., 8,000—8,500 ft. The classic report on the effects of temperature and moisture on this grasshopper is by Parker (1930). MacCarthy (1956) dealt with the correlation between adult populations and weather factors in Saskatchewan. Criddle (1918, 1924) and Shotwell (1930) are among those who have described the egg pods of biliiwratus bilituratus, and Cantrall (1943) gave a detailed account of the way the ovipositing female prepares the hole in the soil. Parker (1930) recorded one caged female which laid 15 egg pods, and the average for 30 females observed by him was 8.8 pods. Other data on egg production were presented by Pfadt (1949) and Smith, Handford, and Chefurka (1952). In laboratory cages, using material from central Saskatchewan, Pickford (personal communication to A. R. B.) has obtained an average of 30 pods for each of 9 females with a calculated maximum of 43 pods (872 eggs) for one female of the lot. A description by Handford (1946) compared nymphs of bilituratus bilituratus with those of other species of Melanoplus. The seasonal history varies a great deal, depending on the weather (Shotwell, 1930, p. 23) and the location. The majority of adults studied by us were collected in July or August, but those collections undoubtedly reflect the habits of collectors almost as much as those of the grasshopper. Shotwell has noted oviposition as late as November. Cantrall (1943) found adults from early July until late October in Michigan, and he suspected that there were two generations. It is suspected that two years are required for the completion of the life cycle in parts of British Columbia (Canad. Insect Pest Rev., vol. 34, p. 273, 1956). Melanoplus bilituratus vulturnus, new subspecies Figures 1,d-1; 2,j,m; 3,c; 6; 7,d; 8,k; 9,f; 10,0; 15,b,c; PLate 1,p,£. Mate (holotype): Size medium for group; fully winged; general appearance as in M. bilituratus bilituratus. Pronotum not strangulate in dorsal view, the posterior margin with the sides forming an angle of about 120°, apex well rounded; median carina of prozona and meta- zona proportioned as to length as 21 : 24, in lateral view only slightly depressed at the principal sulcus; tegmen with portion extending posterior to the apex of the hind femur in proportion to tegminal length as 3.5:17.5; hind femur moderately swollen for group. Furculae slender, sharply tapered, scarcely divergent, extending one- third the length of supra-anal plate; cercus as in figure 7,d-1; sub- genital plate moderately upturned, with twin apices closely associated, evident but poorly separated. 26 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Aedeagus (dry) as in figure 3,c-1, the apex of the dorsal valve strongly curved laterally with anterior margin very heavily sclerotized and excavate along entire length, main portion of dorsal valve less heavily but well sclerotized, decidedly concave, dorsal marginal membrane inconspicuous. Epiphallus with apex of each lophus (fig. 8,k) broad in dorsal view, in lateral view with lophus erect, much elevated, the apical margin barely angulate anteriorly. Coloration: General coloration pale brown, with the customary markings of blackish, mottled with undertones of brown; head with fairly wide blackish brown postocular bar; pronotum mottled with brown above, laterally with irregular blackish longitudinal bar; tegmen lightly speckled with brown, markings very inconspicuous on apical half; hind femur with three fairly noticeable dorsal dark bars, these weakly suggested on external paginal area, ventral portion of paginal area yellowish, section between paginal area and ventral keel pink, ventral and mesal surfaces yellowish, with traces of pinkish, knee crescents black; hind tibiae pale, greenish gray mesally and yellowish brown externally, spines and apical half of spurs blackish brown. Measurements in millimeters: Body, 22.0; pronotum, 4.5; front femur, 3.5; hind femur, 12.0; tegmen, 17.5. Greatest width of pronotum (posterior, including lateral lobes in perspective from above), 3.8; of hind femur, 2.9. EXPLANATION OF FiGuRE 7 a-j: Lateral view of left cercus of male. a: Melanoplus mexicanus: 1, from Bledos, Mexico; 2, from Teotihuacan, Mexico. b: M. spretus: 1, neotype; 2, from Kansas, 1874. ce: M. bilituratus defectus, Casa Grande, Ariz. d: M. bilituratus oulturnus: 1, holotype; 2, from Quincy, Fla.; 3, from Independ- ence, Kans.; 4, from Nantucket, Mass. e: M. bilituratus defectus: 1, from Tempe, Ariz.; 2, from Camarillo, Calif.; 3, from Mount Charleston, Nev. Ff: M. bilituratus bilituratus: 1, from Gun Lake, Mich.; 2, from Washington Territory; 3, from Spokane, Wash.; 4, from Eureka, Calif.; 5, from Placer Co., Calif.; 6, from Doyle, Calif. M. bilituratus bilituratus, with abnormal dorsal valve, Fort Benton, Mont. M. devastator: 1, from Clarkson, Calif.; 2, from Roseburg, Calif.; 3, from Sisson, Calif.; 4, from Grant’s Pass, Oreg.; 5, from Alpine, Calif. i: M. bruneri: 1, 2, from Ft. McLeod, Alberta, Canada (2 specimens); 3, from Chilcotin, British Columbia, Canada; 4, from Mt. Moriah, Nev. j: M. borealis borealis: 1, from Churchill, Manitoba, Canada; 2, from Laggan, Alberta, Canada; 3, from Matanuska, Alaska; 4, from Cummington, Mass.; 5, from Grant, Colo. k,l: Ventral view of right cercus of male (basal end at bottom of page): k: M. devastator, Tacoma, Wash. l: M. bilituratus bilituratus, Dorris, Calif. Sale GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS J | ‘ Ficure 7.—Explanation on facing page. 27 28 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Frmate (allotype): General form as in male, slightly more robust; differing as follows: Compound eyes less globose; longitudinal carinae of vertex more widely separated and less prominent; median carina of prozona and metazona proportioned as 21:26, in lateral view some- what more angulate at principal sulcus; mesosternal hump lacking; cercus as in bilituratus defectus (fig. 10,h); dorsal valve of ovipositor as in figure 10,0. Coloration: Somewhat darker than in holotype; hind tibia red. Measurements in millimeters: Body, 23.0; pronotum, 4.7; front femur, 3.2; hind femur, 13.0; tegmen, 18.0. Greatest width of pronotum, 4.2; of hind femur, 3.2. VARIATION: The size of 10 representative males measured (in milli- meters) varies in pronotal length from 3.5 to 5.0 (av. 4.4), in length of hind femur from 10.0 to 14.0 (av. 12.0), and in length of tegmen from 15.5 to 21.8 (av. 18.3). Six measured females vary in pronotal length from 4.2 to 5.3 (av. 4.7), in length of hind femur from 11.5 to 14.0 (av. 12.8), and in length of tegmen from 16.5 to 23.5 (av. 18.5). Western specimens average larger than eastern ones. In most speci- mens the tegmen extends about 2 to 3 mm. beyond the apex of the hind femur, but in some it scarcely exceeds it by as much as 5 mm. The male cercus usually is essentially like that of the holotype, but the tiny apicoventral “tooth” frequently is absent, and general shape is somewhat variable (fig. 7,d-2,d-4). Very little variation in the shape of the epiphallus has been noted. Intergradation is shown by the shape of the dorsal valve of the aedeagus; in intermediate specimens the ventroanterior margin of the dorsal valve varies between the clearly excavate one of bilituratus vulturnus and the simply recurved margin of bilituratus bilituratus. Wet preparations often show membranous folds apically (“‘m” of fig. 3,c). Some intergrading specimens represent one of the two sub- species more strongly; others represent the other one, and some are fully intermediate. In some cases, as is true of material from Erie and Wood Counties, Ohio, and from Lafayette, Ind., fairly large series of males taken at the same time and place vary. This situation suggests that a mingling of genes of the two subspecies is occurring and that the populations are intergrading, though certain individuals appear nearly typical of one subspecies. A specimen collected at Muscatine, Iowa, Sept. 12, 1935, by R. L. King probably is bilituratus vulturnus, but the dorsal valve (fig. 2,m) is very unusual, recalling certain very long-winged Arizona specimens of bilituratus defectus. The specimen is very long-winged, the tegmen 27 mm. long and extending 11.5 mm. posterior to the hind femur. In 1935 Iowa was experiencing a buildup of grasshoppers, but there is no record of extensive flights into the State then, though at other GRASSHOPPERS—-GURNEY AND BROOKS 29 times “light swarms of what appeared to be nearly typical spretus entered Iowa from the northwest and settled down in the western and southwestern parts of the state’ (Drake and Tauber, 1946). The aedeagus of this specimen appears to be abnormal, but an explanation of this condition merits future attention. Special interest is attached to the material reared by Brett (1947) which he ascribed to M. mezxicanus and the most long-winged speci- mens of which he believed comparable to spretus, the latter considered by him a synonym. Specimens were deposited in the U.S. National Museum by Dr. Brett, and additional ones have been loaned by F, A. Fenton of Oklahoma A. & M. College, where Brett’s main reared series are preserved. He reared specimens in cages, mainly feeding head lettuce, alfalfa, corn, and sorghum. The largest indi- viduals reared were fed head lettuce at 100° F. and 35 percent and 50 percent relative humidity. Some of them resembled spretus in body size and tegminal length, though none of them examined by us has the spretus-type of aedeagus. At the other extreme, individuals reared on alfalfa were comparatively small, and in many of those reared under cool, humid conditions the tegmina were poorly developed as well as short. The aedeagus of a total of 65 males from the Brett material has been examined, these specimens representing the extremes of temper- ature and relative humidity under which rearing occurred, as well as tegminal lengths varying from abortive to extending as much as 6 mm. posterior to the hind femoral apices. Dr. Brett has informed us (in litt., Dec. 17, 1956) that his steck used at temperatures of 75° and 80° F. was collected at Bennet, Nebr. (about 11 miles southeast of Lincoln), that stock for rearings at temperatures above 80° was collected near Stillwater, Okla., and that no Kansas stock was used. Reared material from both the Nebraska and Oklahoma stocks is variable in the structure of the dorsal value of the aedeagus, and there are indications that both stocks are from tension areas where bilituratus bilituratus and bilituratus vulturnus influence occurs, but the great majority of males may readily be recognized as bilituratus vulturnus and we have not considered them intergrades. Males collected at Lincoln, Nebr., and Stillwater, Okla., are comparable to the reared series in aedeagal structures and variation. No reared specimen has an aedeagus like that of spretus, but several reared specimens have the dorsal valve well sclerotized and with little of the shape characteristic of adults of bilituratus vulturnus. It seems most likely that the aedeagus of these specimens failed to mature completely, though the cerci, supra-anal plate, and subgenital plate are, with few exceptions, the type normal for adult bilituratus vulturnus. The tegmina of these particular specimens are mostly abortive or mal- 30 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 formed, suggesting that the individuals had difficulty developing normally. Twelve males from Pittsburgh, Pa., have been examined, including four from a single area within the city, Forbes Field. As a whole, the aedeagus indicates an intergrading population, with no specimens fully typical of either bilituratus bilituratus or bilituratus vulturnus. There is variation, even within the series from Forbes Field, but most of the specimens are nearer bilituratus vulturnus. Although Presque Isle, Pa., is considerably north of Pittsburgh, the two males from there both are typical of bilituratus vulturnus. Perhaps a series would show intergradation. Jennings (1909) reported that though the flora of Presque Isle is more northern than southern in its affinities, some of the plants are typical of those centering in the lower Ohio basin and on the Piedmont Plateau. Possibly this grasshopper represents such a relationship. Jennings illustrated the many ecological habitats which occur on Presque Isle. The single male from Nantucket examined is typical bilituratus vulturnus, though a male from Marion, in the nearby Fall River area of Massachusetts, is intermediate. Other Massachusetts specimens EXPLANATION OF FicurRe 8 a-e: Left cercus of male, lateral view: a: Melanoplus borealis palaceus: 1, holotype; 2, topotype; 3, 4, from Lake- view area, Mont. (2 specimens). b: M. borealis utahensis: 1, holotype; 2, from Ogden, Utah; 3, from Big Cottonwood Canyon, Utah. c: Intermediate between M. borealis utahensis and M. b. palaceus, 3 miles north of Mantua, Utah. d: M. borealis stupefactus: 1, lectotype; 2, from Los Pinos, Colo.; 3, from Mineral Co., Colo. e: Intermediate between M. borealis stupefactus, M. b. palaceus, and M. b. borealis, Tomboy, Colo. f-i: Outline of epiphallus in dorsal view: f: M. borealis borealis, Nachvak Bay, Labrador, Canada. g: M. b. utahensis, holotype. h: M. b. stupefactus, holotype of latifercula. i: M. bilituratus defectus, Casa Grande, Ariz. j-l (2): Outline of epiphallus of male in dorsal view, lophi only: j: M. bilituratus bilituratus, Tuttle, Idaho. k: M. bilituratus oulturnus, holotype, dry preparation. lz: M. devastator: 1, from Davis, Calif.; 2, from Sacramento Co., Calif. 1(3)-m: Epiphallus in lateral view [/ (5)—m showing lateral outline of lophus only): I: M. devastator: 3, lectotype; 4, from Roseville, Calif.; 5, from Tacoma, Wash., dry preparation; 6, from Tulare, Calif., dry preparation; 7, from Gibson, Calif.; 8, same specimen as 7, in lateroposterior view; 9, from Lower Lake, Calif. m: M. bilituratus bilituratus, Milford, Calif. PAV LYN BRA DAP NSN Pet NS TS 32 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 are typical bilituratus bilituratus. Detailed field work in south- eastern Massachusetts might be very informative. Scudder (1878a) noted that Nantucket specimens (reported as atlanis) have a peculiar coloring and nearly all specimens have pale glaucous hind tibiae. Griscom and Folger (1948) reported that the limited flora and fauna of Nantucket include “many southern and relict species,’’ and the climate averages milder than that of Boston. A comparable situation probably occurs in the relation of Long Island to upstate New York. It is surprising that intermediate specimens or typical bilituratus have not been found in the Appalachian Mountains south of Pennsylvania. Specimens from Spruce Knob, W. Va., and Mt. Davis, Pa., show a slight trend toward bilituratus bilituratus, though they are not recog- nized as intermediates. Color variation in bilituratus vuliurnus runs through the usual range common to this group. About 18 percent of the specimens examined have pale or glaucous hind tibiae, the remainder red. Brett (1947, pp. 32-33) felt that food, temperature, and humidity are closely related to the color of the hind tibiae. Specimens reared by him on corn and head lettuce had a higher percentage of red hind tibiae than those reared on alfalfa. High temperature and humidity tended to produce red tibiae. On the other hand, King and Slifer (1955), after rearings from stock collected at Iowa City, Iowa, concluded that red hind tibiae “are dependent on the presence of a dominant, autosomal gene and that blue tibiae are produced when its recessive allele is present in the homozygous condition.””, Nymphs which Brett reared under crowded conditions tended to develop dark patterns character- istic of the gregarious phase of migratory grasshoppers, but adults resulting from such rearings were not distinctively colored, and they tended to have shorter wings than those reared under solitary con- ditions (Brett, 1947, p. 37). EXPLANATION OF FIGURE 9 Dorsal view of supra-anal plate and furculae of males; f and h(2) show full view of apical portion of abdomen. a: M. bruneri: 1, from Ft. McLeod, Alberta, Canada; 2, from Mt. Moriah, Nev.; 3, from Crook Co., Wyo. b: Intermediate between M. borealis utahensis and M. b. palaceus, 3 miles north of Mantua, Utah. c: M. borealis borealis: 1, from Matanuska, Alaska; 2, from Chelsea, Iowa; 3, from Church- ill, Manitoba, Canada. M. borealis stupefactus: 1, from Los Pinos, Colo.; 2, from Mineral Co., Colo. M. borealis utahensis: 1, from Big Cottonwood Canyon, Utah; 2, from Ogden, Utah. M. bilituratus oulturnus, Stokes, S. C. M. bilituratus bilituratus, Pompey’s Pillar, Mont. M. devastator, 1, from San Bernardino, Calif.; 2, from Chico, Calif. TAT A GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS Figure 9.—Explanation on facing page. 477119593 34 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Type: USNM 63543. TYPE LOCALITY: Stokes, Colleton Co., S. C. The holotype male was collected by Miss Lotta Bootle in September 1924. The allotype (USNM) was taken at Columbia, S. C., Sept. 22, 1923, by Philip Luginbill. There are 99 male and 36 female paratypes deposited in the U. S. National Museum, Canadian National Museum, Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Museum of Comparative Zoology, University of Michigan, University of Arizona, Clemson Agricultural College, Florida Plant Board, and the collection of John R. Hilliard. The para- types are from the following localities: Norra Carouina: Weldon, Greensboro, Pilot Mt., Charlotte, Roan Valley, Mt. Mitchell, Asheville, Hendersonville, Black Mts., Valley of Black Mts., Balsam, Sunburst, Highlands. Soutu Carotina: Green Sea, Mullins, Cheraw, Florence, Manning, Columbia, St. Paul, Eutawville, Stokes, Clemson, Madison. GrorciA: Rabun Bald, Black Rock Mountain, Tallulah Falls, Louisville, Dublin, Stone Mountain, Atlanta, Locust Grove, Cedar Rocks (5 miles north of Jackson), Barnesville, Macon, Montezuma, Smithville, Calhoun, Sand Mountain (near Trenton). Fiorina: Gainesville, Alachua Co., Hamilton Co., Houston, Lake Miccosuke (Jefferson Co.), Quincy, Gadsden Co., Rock Bluff Landing (Liberty Co.), “Camp Torreya” (Liberty Co.), Jackson Co., Marianna, Chipola. ALABAMA: Auburn, Stokes, Selma, Greenville, Flomaton, Canebreak. MississipP1: Meridian, Perkinston, Jackson, Vicksburg. LovistANA: Harahan, Ruston, Sibley. Most of the specimens from additional localities shown on the map (fig. 6) for bilituratus vulturnus are typical, but some vary toward bilituratus bilituratus, though not sufficiently to be considered inter- mediates, and so are not designated as paratypes. However, males from other localities, as mapped, are considered intermediates between bilituratus bilituratus and bilituratus vulturnus. BIOLOGY AND ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE: In many localities bilituratus vulturnus becomes extremely abundant, and it is highly important economically, especially in the western part of its range. Kansas, Oklahoma, and Missouri are the chief States where it is very injurious. Wilbur and Fritz (1940) stated that during the 1933-39 outbreak in the bluestem region of eastern Kansas it was the most injurious crop infest- ing grasshopper, and they briefly described the buildup of its popu- lation during several drought years. Morse (1904, p. 42) referred to this grasshopper as ‘‘probably the most widely and generally distributed” of those found in the South- eastern States, but this opinion differs from that of Rehn and Hebard (1916, p. 237), who found bilituratus vulturnus (reported as atlanis) GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 35 “relatively infrequent in the Coastal Plain south of North Carolina and the lower Gulf drainage of southern Georgia, in addition to having never been definitely recorded from peninsular Florida.’’ Material examined suggests that in northern Florida bilituratus vulturnus is fairly widely distributed, though it is not generally abundant. Friauf (1953) examined a wide variety of grassland and other habitats on an area of about 2,180 acres in Putnam County, Fla., collecting an esti- mated 24,000 specimens of Orthoptera and Dermaptera during a period of more than 15 months in the field, yet he did not find bilituratus vulturnus. There is a paucity of records from the lower coastal plain of South Carolina and Georgia. The pertinent physiographic regions are shown on a map by Rehn and Hebard (1916, p. 95), and a com- parison of their collecting stations (map, p. 91) with those indicated by Morse (1904, p. 10) suggests that the latter did relatively less sampling of the coastal plain fauna in Georgia and South Carolina, while his collecting trip (made in 1903) did not include peninsular Florida at all. This grasshopper occurs most frequently in fields and uncultivated, open areas. Fox (1917) mentioned its tendency to congregate in Virginia in farm lands on sandy soils, and Isley (1938), in eastern Texas, classified it as a species of shallow soil. Like the northern subspecies, bilituratus vulturnus is found in many less typical environ- ments, such, for example, as the shale barrens of Virginia which Gurney (1941) described as the habitat of M. impudicus Scudder. Fox reported it quite scarce in the higher Appalachians, but our records and those of Hebard (1945) show that it is frequent in clearings at higher elevations. The following are among the altitudes cited on labels of specimens examined: White Top Mountain, Va., 5,500 ft.; Little Bald, Great Smoky National Park, Tenn., 4,800 ft.; Unaka Mountains, Tenn., 3,500 ft. As to food, Isley (1938) found that bilituratus vulturnus (reported as mexicanus) “selected rather widely among monocotyledons and dicotyledons showing a definite preference for crop plants.” In a report on the sculpturing and other detailed features of grass- hopper eggs by Tuck and Smith (1939), descriptions of mezicanus eggs probably are attributable to bilituratus vulturnus because the work was conducted mainly in eastern Kansas. Regarding the seasonal occurrence of adults, the following early and late dates from labels of specimens examined may be cited; Jackson Co., Ohio, June 12, 1932; Vinton Co., Ohio, Nov. 24, 1936; McNeill, Miss., May 8, 1925; Austin, Tex., April 15, 1956; College Station, Tex., June 17, 1920, Nov. 20, 1924; Weatherford, Okla., 36 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 June 6-7, 1938; Ft. Sill, Okla., Nov. 10, 1918; House Springs, Mo., Nov. 11, 1925; Clarksville, Tenn., Oct. 14, 1916. In Virginia, Fox (1917) concluded from observations of adult prevalence that there are two generations per year. He found that adults appear about June 1, reach a peak of abundance, and then in late July decline in numbers; about the middle of August he noted the appearance of a new group of adults. In Kansas, Wilbur and Fritz (1940) recorded a peak of abundance from the middle of June until late July; in 1934 there was a fall peak of adults between October 6 and November 9. Remarks: The name of this subspecies is from ‘“‘vulturnus ventus,”’ a Roman term for a south-southeast wind, chosen in allusion to the distribution of this subspecies. EXPLANATION OF FicuReE 10 a-e: Epiphallus in lateral view, males: a: Melanoplus spretus, Neotype. b: M. bruneri: 1, from Ft. McLeod, Alberta, Canada; 2, from Mt. Moriah, Nev. c: M. borealis borealis, Nachvak Bay, Labrador, Canada. d: M. borealis stupefactus, holotype of latifercula. M. borealis utahensis, holotype. ercus of females: M. mexicanus, Cuernavaca, Mex. M. bilituratus bilaturatus, Hogeland, Mont. M. bilituratus defectus, San Carlos Indian Reservation, Ariz. M. devastator, Gazelle, Calif. M. bilituratus defectus, Chandler, Ariz. M. bruneri, Isle Royale, Mich. M. borealis borealis, lectotype of septenirionalts. m: M. borealis stupefactus, Mineral Co., Colo. n-p: Left dorsal valve of ovipositor: n: WM. bilituratus bilituratus, Hogeland, Mont. o: M. bilituratus oulturnus, allotype. p: M. devastator, Gazelle, Calif. q: Female apical abdominal structures of M. mexicanus, Cuernavaca, Mexico. r-t: Left dorsal valve of ovipositor: r: M. bruneri, Isle Royale, Mich. s: M. borealis borealis, lectotype of sepientrionalts. t: M. borealis palaceus, allotype. u-x: Apex of male subgenital plate in posterior view: u: M. bilituratus defectus, Chandler, Ariz. vo: M. spretus: 1, from Pueblo, Colo., July 8-9, 1877; 2, from Argentine Pass, Colo., July 16, 1877. w: M. bilituratus bilituratus, Poplar, Mont. x: M. devastator: 1, from Merced River, Yosemite National Park, Calif.; 2, from Tehachapi, Calif.; 3, from Alpine, Calif.; 4, from Grant’s Pass, Oreg. 8 fm: Left oO m See FT SH GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS ome BN | 2 3 é Ficure 10.—Explanation on facing page. 38 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Melanoplus bilituratus defectus Scudder, new combination Ficures 2,1,1; 3,d,h; 6; 7,c,e; 8,2; 10,h,j,u; 16,0; Phares 2,A,B,C; 4,A. Melanoplus defectus Scudder, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. 36 (154), pp. 20, 32, 1897; Proc. U. S. Nat. Museum, vol. 20, pp. 132, 177-178, pl. 12, fig. 6, 1897. (One male, one female, Grand Junction, Mesa Co., Colo.) Lectotype, designated by Rehn and Hebard (1912, p. 80): Male from Grand Junction, Colo. (ANSP). Hebard (1929, p. 390) placed defectus as a synonym of brunera, but the aedeagus of the lectotype shows that it belongs to the Grand Junction population of bilituratus, here considered to be encompassed within the limits of the southwestern subspecies. The lectotype is small, with a body length of 19.5 mm. The tegmina fail by about 2 mm. to reach the tips of the hind femora. The dorsal valve of the aedeagus is poorly sclerotized and pale, but is comparable in shape to other specimens of this subspecies from southwestern Colo- rado. The optimum development of bilituratus defectus occurs in the central and southern portions of Arizona and New Mexico, and it is unfortunate that the type locality is not within that area. The lectotype shows closer relationship to the optimum development of bilituratus defectus than it does to bilituratus bilituratus. The term “intermediate” as used for this subspecies (including the explanation of fig. 6), connotes specimens showing intergradation between the optimum population of bilituratus defectus and bilituratus bilituratus. From a nomenclatural point of view those specimens are not inter- mediates comparable to those discussed elsewhere in this paper because the type locality of bilituratus defectus is outside the area of optimum development. The most distinctive character of bilituratus defectus is the dorsal valve of the aedeagus, which in specimens of optimum development has the anterior margin (x of fig. 3,d) concave and the lateral flap- like area (y) wide and with a sinuate margin (z). In some speci- mens, mainly those intermediate with bilituratus bilituratus (fig. 3,f), the lateral portion is not typically developed. (Also see second paragraph below.) ‘The male cercus usually is about as in figure 7,e-2), though occasionally it is much broader (fig. 7,e-3). Especially in intermediate specimens from Baker, Nev., the cercus is narrower. VARIATION: The size of 13 representative males, measured in milli- meters, varies in pronotal length from 3.5 to 5.7 (av. 4.3), in length of hind femur from 9.8 to 14.5 (av. 12.4), and for length of tegmen from 11.5 to 22.5 (av. 17.8). Eight measured females vary in pro- notal length from 4.5 to 6.0 (av. 5.4), for length of hind femur from 13.0 to 16.0 (av. 14.5), and for length of tegmen from 17.5 to 23.4 (av. 21.0). Specimens from Ft. Wingate, N. Mex., and Kaibab, GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 39 Ariz., are small and dark, in marked contrast to the richly colored, more yellowish specimens reared on winter mustard at Tempe, Ariz. In average specimens of bilituratus defectus the tegmen extends about 4 mm. beyond the hind femur. With the exception of material noted in the next paragraph, extremes among specimens examined are a male from Kaibab, Ariz., and one from Phoenix, Ariz., in which the tegmen extends 1.5 and 7 mm., respectively. Six males and 11 females from several Arizona localities are so long-winged and, in the case of males, have so unusual an aedeagus that they are discussed separately in order that all the data will be assembled for future reference if importance should become attached to them as a distinct population. The aedeagus in lateral view (figs. 2,/; 3,h) has the dorsal valve extending anteriorly and with little development of a concave lateral surface; however, the dorsal valve differs slightly in length and shape, and in one specimen the anterior apical margin is very weakly recurved in a suggestion of bilituratus defectus; another specimen (from Tumacacori National Monument) has a second right dorsal valve present, which approaches that of bihturatus defectus, although the left one and the other right one are essentially as figured. It appears that the aedeagus in this series is abnormal or not fully developed, and that the specimens are bilituratus defectus. Fred Skoog, collector of the Chandler specimens, has informed us that they were taken among bilituratus defectus where the population was 50 to 75 per square yard in an alfalfa field, and 500 to 1000 along the margins of the field. The few un- usually long-winged specimens found by him had only recently become adult, and their somewhat teneral condition may have had a bearing on the shape of the aedeagus. Other genitalic characters of these specimens fall within the normal variation of bzlituratus defectus; the following figures illustrate them: 7,c; 8,7,; 10,7,w; 16,6. The general appearance of the above specimens is as shown (plates 2,c;4,A). Gurney (1953, pl. 7, fig. c) previously illustrated one of the females from Chandler, and Barnes (1956) referred to long-winged Arizona specimens; both authors applied the name M. mezxicanus mexicanus. The lengths of the tegmen and hind femur of these specimens are, respectively, as follows: Males, 26.0-31.0 (av. 27.90), 13.3-14.8 (av. 14.02); females, 27.0-33.5 (av. 29.67), 15.0-17.2 (av. 15.93). The extremes and averages of the distance from apex of hind femur to apex of tegmen are as follows: Male, 9.0-14.0 (av. 11.28) ; female, 8.0-13.5 (av. 10.04). The following label data accompany this long-winged material (all from Arizona): Casa Grande, swept from alfalfa, July 20, 1951, N. J. Nerney (1); Chandler, lush irrigated alfalfa, May 1945, F. Skoog (2c, 89); Tempe, alfalfa, Aug. 31, 1938, O. L. Barnes 40 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 (10%); Tempe, swept from alfalfa, June 8, 1950, N. J. Nerney (19); Theba, on alfalfa, Oct. 26, 1939, O. L. Barnes (1); Tumacacori National Monument (Pendleton Ranch), Sept. 9, 1939, E. R. Tinkham (1°); Yuma, alfalfa, Aug. 2, 1938, O. L. Barnes (19); Yuma, alfalfa, Nov. 11, 1936, O. L. Barnes (19). Of 311 specimens of bilituratus defectus examined, only two (one each from Las Vegas, N. Mex., and Lupton, Ariz.) have glaucous hind tibiae; the others are red. However, 13 of 57 specimens which are intermediate with bilituratus bilituratus have glaucous hind tibiae. None of these intermediate specimens is as long-winged and large as the most optimum specimens of bilituratus defectus. Several of the intermediates from southern Colorado and northern New Mexico are noticeably small and dark. The distribution of males of bilituratus defectus examined is shown in figure 6. The single Texas locality is Phantom Lake, Davis Moun- tains. BioLoGY AND ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE: This grasshopper is important economically and is most injurious in irrigated areas (Ball, Tinkham, et al., 1942; Harper, 1952). It is said by Harper not to have become a pest in the Imperial Valley of California until 1915 when farming there became extensive. Cultivated crops are injured more severely than grazing areas. Barnes (1955) compared five plants as food for bilituratus defectus in cage studies in Arizona, and his paper should be consulted for observations on mating, egg development, adult body dimensions, and weights of adults, as influenced by diet. Two annual generations usually are reported, and Barnes feels that a considerable difference in average size of individuals representing the two generations probably is due to the plants available as food. For instance, in 1944 the second generation in the Yuma, Ariz., area developed almost exclusively on dry alfalfa and Bermuda grass, and resulting adults were much smaller than first generation adults. A comparable difference in adult size at the San Carlos Indian Reservation, Ariz., was noted in the two generations in 1953. First generation nymphal diet consisted mainly of forbs, while the second generation had to develop mostly on grasses. It may be significant that all of the especially long-winged specimens discussed in detail, which bear habitat data, were associated with alfalfa. In southern California (Harper, 1952), bilituratus defectus first hatches by March or early April; then the second generation occurs in September and October. Some early and late dates on labels of adults examined are as follows: Yuma, Ariz., Jan. 5, 1937; Bard, Calif., Jan. 19, 1937; Yuma, Calif., Apr. 17, 1942; Saugus, Calif., Oct. 19, 1950; Zion National Park, Utah, June 18, 1953; same, Sept. GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 41 5, 1926; Peeples Valley, Ariz., Oct. 2, 1936; Chino Valley, Ariz., Nov. 23, 1936; Roll, Ariz., Nov. 12, 1943; same, Dec. 1, 1936. Altitudinally, bilituratus defectus ranges in distribution from about sea level in Imperial Co., Calif., to 11,800 feet on Mt. Charleston, Nev. Other high altitudes indicated on labels of specimens examined are the following: Magdalena Mts., N. Mex., 7,100 ft.; Lee Canyon, Spring Mountains, Nev., 8,600 ft.; Rim Rock Peak, Sandia Mts., N. Mex., 9,500-10,000 ft. The specimens from high elevations average somewhat smaller than specimens of optimum development from low elevations, and they are relatively dark in color, but in general they are not distinctive. Melanoplus devastator Scudder Ficures, l,e;, 2,4;:3,i;.7,h,k;.8,l;.9,h;/10,i,p,2; 14; Puate 3,8,c. Melanoplus devastator Scudder, Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., vol. 19, pp. 287, 288, 1878. (Males, females, Shasta Valley, Sissons, Sausalito, Calif.; Lake Tahoe, Reno, Glen Brook, Nev.; Beaver Brook, Morrison, Colo.) Lectotype, here designated: Male labeled ‘‘Sept. 1, 1874, Sauzalito, Cal.,”’ ‘““Scudder’s Type,” “Mel. devastator typicalis Scudder’s Type, 1895,’ ‘Sc. reference Rev. Melanopli 1897, p. 198,” “‘M. devastator Scudd. Cab. 8. H. Scudder.” (ANSP). Sausalito is one of the original localities mentioned by Scudder (1878b), who said that the form named M., d. typicalis ‘‘best represents the original types of the species when first described,’ and this specimen is one so identified by him. Melanoplus ater Scudder, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. 36 (154), pp. 22, 32, 1897; Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, pp. 133, 194-195, pl. 13, fig. 2, 1897 (two males, 3 females, San Francisco, Calif.). Lectotype, designated by Rehn and Hebard (1912, p. 80): Male (ANSP). Melanoplus consanguineus Scudder, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. 36 (154), pp. 21, 32, 1897; Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, pp. 133, 192-193, pl. 12, fig. 10, 1897 (male, female, Sacramento Co., Calif., Sonora Co. in plate explana- tion, p. 409, error for Sonoma Co.; see Rehn and Hebard, 1912, p. 80). New synonymy. Lectotype, designated by Rehn and Hebard (1912): Male (USNM). Melanoplus diminutus Scudder, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. 36 (154), pp. 21, 32, 1897; Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, pp. 133, 190-191, pl. 12, fig. 9, 1897 (males, females, San Francisco, Calif.; Monterey, Calif.). New synonymy. Lectotype, designated by Rehn and Hebard (1912, p. 80): Male from Mon- terey, Calif. (MCZ). Melanoplus uniformis Scudder, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. 36 (154), pp. 22, 32, 1897; Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, pp. 133, 201-202, pl. 13, fig. 9, 1897 (males, females, five California localities). New synonymy. Lectotype, designated by Rehn and Hebard (1912, p. 80): Male from Sacramento, Calif. (USNM). 3 Labels such as this one, with ‘‘Scudder’s Type, 1895’ printed, were affixed to many of the specimens studied by Scudder in connection with his revision (1897b). Species described by other authors, as well as those by Scudder, and, where series were available, more than one specimen of the same species, were So treated. The principal function of this label today is to indicate a specimen studied by Scudder himself, and one presumably considered by him to be typical of the species named. 42 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Melanoplus virgatus Scudder, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. 36 (154), pp. 22, 32, 1897; Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, pp. 133, 199-201, pl. 13, fig. 8, 1897 (males, females, six California localities). Lectotype, designated by Rehn and Hebard (1912, p. 80): Male from Siskiyou Co., Calif. (MCZ). Melanoplus devastator affinis Scudder, Proc. U. 8. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, p. 199, pl. 13, fig. 6, 1897 (males, Sierra, Sacramento, and Los Angeles Counties, Calif., also “California, S. Henshaw.’’). Lectotype, here designated: Male labeled “Cal. (Ricksecker) 8. Henshaw,” ‘‘Mel. devastator affinis Scudder’s Type 1895,” and figured by Scudder, 1897b (MCZ). Melanoplus devastator conspicuus Scudder, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, p. 199, pl. 13, fig. 7, 1897 (males, Sacramento, El Dorado, Amador, and Merced Counties, Calif.). Lectotype, here designated: Male labeled ‘Clarkson, Eldorado Co. Cal. 14/8, 85, Type No. 1160, U. S. N. M., Mel. devastator conspicuus Scudder’s Type, 1895’”” (USNM). (We have been unable to locate a Clarkson in El Dorado County, and the label may have been in error for Clarksona, Amador County, which is nearby. The male from Sacra- mento, Calif., figured by Scudder has not been found. El Dorado County is the second locality mentioned.) Melanoplus devastator obscurus Scudder, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, pp. 198- 199, pl. 13, figs. 3, 4, 1897 (males, San Francisco, Calif.; Sierra, Placer, Marin, Sacramento, El Dorado, Alameda, Siskiyou, and Los Angeles Counties, Calif.). Lectotype, here designated: Male labeled “‘Sissons Cal., Drawn, S. H. Scudder Coll, Type 15439, Mel. devastator obscurus Scudder’s Type, 1895” and figured by Scudder, 1897b (MCZ). Melanoplus devastator typicalis Scudder, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, p. 199, pl. 13, fig. 5, 1897 (males, ‘‘nearly every county . . . from Shasta to San Diego and from Marin to Sierra,’”’ Calif.). (The sexes and number of speci- mens of this and the previous three entities were not given by Scudder, but male specimens were figured. In each case both sexes were before him, as shown by preserved specimens.) Lectotype, here designated: Male labeled “Tighe Calif.. Drawn, S. H. Scudder Coll, Type 15441, Mel. devastator typicalis Scudder’s Type, 1895” and figured by Scudder (1897b) (MCZ). Scudder listed Dr. Edward Palmer as the collector of the Tighe specimen. We have been unable to find Tighe on available maps, and for the information that Tighe was about 8 miles east of Ramona, Calif., are indebted to Rogers McVaugh, a botanist who has made a study of Palmer collecting localities. This location, about 45 miles northeast of San Diego, apparently was a ranch. Palmer’s un- published notes indicate that he was there July 5-6, 1875. For a biography and sketch of Palmer’s travels, see Safford (Pop. Sci. Monthly, vol. 78, pp. 341-354, 1911) and McVaugh’s (1956) recent book, wherein (p. 333) the locality is listed as Tigh(e)’s (Ranch or Station). All the lectotypes mentioned have been examined, in each case including the aedeagus and epiphallus, and they are considered to represent a single species, (4. devastator Scudder. Kirby (1910) placed d. affinis, d. conspicuus, d. obscurus, and d. typicalis as synonyms of devastator, and Caudell (1915) did likewise for virgatus and affirmed the synonymy of d. affinis and d. typicalis. He also considered GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 43 consanguineus a synonym of diminutus. M. d. affinis should not be confused with M. affinis, described by Scudder (1897b, p. 171), which preoccupies it. The types of ater, diminutus, and d. obscurus are small, very dark individuals; those of uniformis, virgatus, and d. conspicuus are noticeably large and yellowish; consanguineus is relatively small and moderately dark; d. affinis is medium-sized and yellowish; devastator and d. typicalis are medium-sized and moderately dark. DescriIpTivE Notes: A medium-sized, usually fully winged member of the mezxicanus group. Head with dorsal carinae of vertex about as in bilituratus bilituratus; mesosternal hump absent or weakly de- veloped in male, absent in female. MALE GENITALIA: Cercus elongate and slender for group, with a characteristic preapical knob extending ventrally and mesally on the mesal surface (fig. 7,k), typically as in figure 7,h-1, sometimes pro- portionally shorter, often with a small tooth near the ventroposterior angle (fig. 7,h-2,3); furculae sometimes more divergent than illus- trated (fig. 9,h-2); subgenital plate weakly to moderately upturned (pl. 3,8), in posterior view (fig. 10,7) with twin apices usually distinct, rarely (fig. 10,7-4) scarcely developed; aedeagus (figs. 2,k; 3,7) with dorsal valve lightly sclerotized, rather thin and parchment-like, the anterior margin with narrow fold, in dry specimens a basal lobe along ventroanterior margin usually evident; when dry the dorsal valve often is more concave and the margin is more recurved than when preserved wet; accessory lobe medium-sized to large for group; epiphallus (fig. 8,/-3,9) distinctive in that lophus is angulate in lateral view near apex, the angulation correlated with more or less acute apex in dorsal view (fig. 8,/-1,2). FEMALE GENITALIA: Cercus (fig. 10,7) relatively acute for group, not so robust and blunt as in bilituratus bilituratus; dorsal valve of ovipositor with ‘‘scoop”’ well developed. VaRIATION: The size of 10 representative males, measured in millimeters, varies in pronotal length from 3.7 to 5.3 (av. 4.3), in length of hind femur from 9.7 to 15.2 (av. 11.4), and in length of tegmen from 12.0 to 21.8 (av. 14.8). Seven measured females vary in pronotal length from 3.6 to 5.9 (av. 4.8), in length of hind femur from 10.0 to 15.5 (av. 12.8), and in length of tegmen from 10.6 to 23.1 (av. 17.5). There is great variation in size, and small specimens are frequently encountered in the San Francisco, Calif., area, and in Oregon and Washington. The tegmina of the smaller specimens usually do not surpass the apex of the hind femur, and in some specimens they are as much as 2 mm. short of the femoral apex. In larger specimens with optimum development the tegmina fre- quently exceed the hind femora by about 3 mm, 44 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 DistriBuTion: Figure 14 shows the distribution of devastator as known to the authors. However, uncertainty concerning identifica- tions in the group during the past has been responsible for early published records which pointed to a much wider distribution. Both Essig (1926, p. 81) and Harper (1952) include Arizona in the dis- tribution, but Hebard (1935b, p. 304) stated that devastator does not occur there. Buckell (1922, p. 31) included devastator in his British Columbia list, based on a Vancouver Island record by Caudell. Caudell (1908, p. 77) recorded devastator conspicuus from Wellington, British Columbia, and a manuscript note written by him in 1926 indicated that the record was based on a female specimen. The specimen, a female with red hind tibiae, is in the U. 8S. National Museum, and is bilituratus bilituratus. Male specimens of Melanoplus devastator have been examined from the localities shown in figure 14. BioLoGy AND ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE: When Scudder (1878b) originally described devastator, he stated that it probably ‘Ss the source of most of the damage to crops in California,” and it frequently has been of much importance there. The fullest early account is Coquillett’s (1892) report on the 1891 infestation, which includes biological notes. Woodworth (1902) stated that devastator was one of the two most destructive California grasshoppers in 1901. Brief later accounts are by Essig (1926) and Harper (1952). Fulton (1930, p. 634) referred to devastator as one of the ‘‘more strictly prairie species” of the Willamette Valley of western Oregon and universally present there during the proper season. A concise summary of the biology and economic importance of devastator by Wilson (1947) points out that it is the dominant species on much of the semiarid range in California, and that preventing mass migrations from natural habitats to cultivated crops is one of the critical control measures, in addition to preventing serious damage to range forage. Nymphs inhabit much of the range and feed on legumes, alfilarias, bromes, and hordeums, in the order named, as long as they remain succulent. Wilson, to whose excellent summary the reader is referred for more detailed information on habits and seasonal occur- rence, commented as follows on the physiological distinctness of devastator: By the second week of July the species has largely reached the adult stage. To the casual observer the adults resemble the lesser migratory grasshopper (M. mexicanus Sauss.). However, field and microscopic observations show that these two species differ in external anatomy, habitat, and seasonal history. M. devasta- tor is naturally found on the range, whereas M. mexicanus is found in California and Nevada, largely, if not entirely, in irrigated alfalfa fields. Dissections have shown that, unlike M. mexicanus and many of the other economic species that begin oviposition within 10 days after reaching the adult stage, M. devastator has a GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 45 preoviposition period ranging from 90 to 176 days, during which no ovarian development or copulation takes place. The breaking of this diapause, or period of arrested development, apparently depends on temperature and food. Cool fall weather, with rains sufficient to germinate the seed of annual plants, appears to be the determining factor in breaking the diapause. Middlekauff (1958) more recently summarized observations on the bionomics of devastator. The following are some early and late capture dates noted on specimens examined: Catirornia: San Bernardino, May 14; Kern Lake, Kern Co., May 22; San Luis Obispo, June 14; Monterey Co., Oct. 31; Roseville, Nov. 26; Red Bluff, Dec. 2. Wasuineron: Tacoma, Sept. 25. Melanoplus bruneri Scudder FieureEs 1,9; 2,a,b; 3,k,l; 7,2; 9,a; 10,6,k,r; 11,a; 12; 13; 16,h; Puare 3,a. Melanoplus brunert Scudder, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. 36 (154), pp. 19, 32, 1897; Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, pp. 132, 164-166, pl. 11, fig. 7, 1897 (males, females, 12 localities in Alberta, Montana, Nebraska, Colorado, and Washington). Lectotype designated by Rehn and Hebard (1912, p. 79): Male labeled ‘‘Ft. McLeod, B. A. Aug. 82’’ (near southwest corner of Alberta; itinerary described by Bruner, 1883, who was given as collector by Scudder, 1897b, p. 166) (ANSP). Melanoplus excelsus Scudder, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. 36 (154), pp. 19, 32, 1897; Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, pp. 132, 166-167, pl. 11, fig. 9, 1897 (males, females, above timber, 11,000 to 13,000 ft., Mt. Lincoln, Park Co., Colo.). Lectotype designated by Rehn and Hebard (1912, p. 79): Male (MCZ). Melanoplus alaskanus Scudder, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. 36 (154), pp. 20, 32, 1897; Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, pp. 132, 169-170, pl. 12, fig. 1, 1897 (2¢°, 19, Alaska; Spilmacheen, British Columbia). Lectotype designated by Rehn and Hebard (1912, p. 79): Male from Alaska (USNM). Hebard (1929, p. 390) considered M4. defectus Scudder and M. di- midipennis Bruner synonyms of M. bruneri, but the types indicate that defectus is a subspecies of bilituratus, and dimidipennis a synonym of bilituratus bilituratus. Hebard (1928, p. 284; 1929, p. 390) indicated the synonymy of excelsus, which is borne out by the lectotype. The posterior surface of the subgenital plate is dimpled, but not vertically grooved nor incised at the apex, a condition included in the variation of bruneri, and the aedeagus is typical of bruneri. Walker (1910, 1920) indicated the synonymy of alaskanus, and the lectotypes of alaskanus and brunert demonstrate that synonymy. Earlier, Walker (1906) had recorded alaskanus from Vernon, British Columbia, with the identity questioned. In 1909 Walker discussed the variation shown by an Ontario series, as correlated with the differences in Scudder’s descriptions of the two supposed species (alaskanus and bruneri) and he then reduced alaskanus to a variety of A6 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VoL. 110 brunert. Pettit and McDaniel (1918) treated the Michigan population as adlaskanus. Essig (1926, p. 81) listed alaskanus as a synonym of bruneri. Hebard (1925a, p. 114) questioned the synonymy indicated by Walker, and later said (1928, pp. 281-282) he believed alaskanus to be a geographic race of mexicanus if nominal recognition is war- ranted. Rehn (1952) agreed with Hebard’s opinion. Because of the difference of opinion concerning alaskanus, it may be helpful to discuss the type in more detail. It is the specimen selected by Rehn and Hebard, and was received at the U. S. National Museum on Feb. 29, 1892, from T. C. Mendenhall of the U. S. Coast and Geo- detic Survey. Accession records show that the material was collected by J. E. McGrath during an expedition which was active along the Alaskan Boundary during September 1890-May 1891. McGrath (1893) has described the general experiences of the party which he led up the Yukon River, and (p. 185) has commented about the plenti- ful insects found near the river in summer. It appears that the type specimen was collected along the Yukon River somewhere between Ft. Yukon and the 141st Meridian. A male of bruneri, collected in 1948 near Fairbanks, Alaska, a locality at about the same latitude as the intersection of the Yukon River and 141st Meridian, confirms the presence of this species in Alaska, so there is no reason to doubt the source of the alaskanus lectotype. Hebard did not examine the aedeagus of the lectotype and so did not have this evidence which shows agreement with brunert. Although bruneri, excelsus, and alaskanus were all described in the same publication, the action of the first revisers (Hebard, 1928, for excelsus; Walker, 1910, for alaskanus) establishes the precedent of using bruneri as the valid name of this species. It is much the best known of the three names, and has page priority in Scudder (1897b). Though not required, page priority was recommended in the 1953 Copenhagen Decisions of Zoological Nomenclature when other con- ditions are equal. Descriptive Notes: A usually medium-sized, fully winged member of the mexicanus group, most closely related to bilituratus, from which it differs mainly in male genitalia. Mesosternal hump variable (fig. 1,9), averaging fully as prominent in male as in bilituratus, absent in female; tegmina usually reaching slightly beyond tip of abdomen, sometimes short of it. Females not always separable from bilituratus, but in any given locality where both species occur brunert females usually more robust and often shorter-winged; males usually recog- nizable by cercus and subgenital plate, but in doubtful cases the dorsal valve of aedeagus of bruneri is highly distinctive in its much more expansive and thin, striated, conformation. MALE GENITALIA: Cercus (fig. 7,7) variable, usually about as in GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 47 figure 7,i-2 more incurved along dorsal margin and more evenly rounded along ventroposterior margin than frequent in bilituratus; supra-anal plate (fig. 9,¢@) elongate, lateral elevations prominent; furculae usually reaching to middle of supra-anal plate or approxi- mately so; subgenital plate in lateral view with apical portion strongly upturned, sometimes rather abruptly so (fig. 16,4), often superficially accentuated by upward curvature of abdomen; posterior view of sub- genital plate usually as in figures 11,a-1 or 11,a-4, with apical margin entire and posterior surface grooved, frequently apical margin is dimpled (fig. 11,a-2), or there are well formed twin apices (fig. 11,a-3), and rarely margin is squarish and irregular (fig. 11,¢-5). Aedeagus with main stem relatively short; dorsal valve moderately sclerotized, thin, often appearing almost parchment-like, large and marked with striations; in dorsal view a triangular projection (x in fig. 3,k) of the well-sclerotized dorsal rim of the dorsal valve is distinctive; accessory lobe large for group; epiphallus as in figure 10,0. FEMALE GENITALIA: Cercus (fig. 10,k) relatively short and blunt, the dorsal margin often somewhat irregular; ovipositor with ‘‘scoop”’ of dorsal valve (fig. 10,7) strongly concave. Variation: The size of nine representative males, measured in millimeters, varies in pronotal length from 3.6 to 5.1 (av. 4.6), in length of hind femur from 9.0 to 13.0 (av. 11.9), and in length of tegmen from 12.0 to 19.5 (av. 16.6). Seven measured females vary in pronotal length from 3.6 to 6.0 (av. 4.8), in length of hind femur from 9.6 to 16.0 (av. 13.1), and in length of tegmen from 11.5 to 20.7 (av. 17.1). The smallest specimens seen are from Mt. Moriah, Nev., the largest from Michigan. Cotoration: General coloration about as in bilituratus, varying from pale brown to blackish; hind femur usually with three external and dorsal dark bands, poorly developed in pale individuals; hind tibia varying from pale greenish yellow to red, usually pinkish to red. DistRiIBuTION: Several records of bruneri add significantly to the distribution based on male specimens examined (figs. 12, 13). Fulton (1930) reported it from Grant’s Pass, Oreg.; Hebard (1925a) listed Nipigon and Dwight (Ontario), Norrie and Oregon (Wisconsin), Gordon (Nebraska), and Englewood (South Dakota); Hebard (1932b) reported a specimen from Onawa, Iowa; and Hebard (1935a, p. 68) said that Beulah and Agua Fria Park are eastern limits in New Mexico. Stehr (1936) gave several Minnesota records which supple- mented those of Hebard (1932b; 1934a). BioLoGy AND ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE: On the high montane ranges of the Northwestern States and western Canada, bruneri is injurious to grazing areas. There have been fairly frequent references to the importance of bruneri in western Canada (Canad. Insect Pest Rev., 48 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 vol. 23, p. 2, 1945; vol. 24, p. 348, 1946; vol. 28, p. 255, 1950; vol. 33, pp. 10, 341, 1955). Treherne and Buckell (1924, p. 26) described it and Bradynotes chilcotinae Hebard (now Buckellacris chilcotinae chilcotinae) as the most common and injurious grasshoppers “‘in the lightly timbered areas of the summer range in the Chilcotin section (of B. C.) during 1920 and 1921.” In 1921 A. G. Ruggles reported to the Insect Pest Survey, U. S. Department of Agriculture, that damage by bruneri was occurring at Grand Rapids, Minn. The frequency of its capture on upland ranges in Montana suggests its importance there, as do comments on its abundance by Pepper, et al. (1953). An unusual infestation of bruneri occurred on Mt. Moriah, Nev., in the 1930’s. Material collected Sept. 2, 1937, and Aug. 16, 1939, is in the U. S. National Museum, and data on the infestation have been obtained from Lee M. Burge, Division of Plant Industry, Nevada Department of Agriculture. Mt. Moriah is located about 35 miles east of Ely, Nev., just north of Baker. The infested range is a large table area at an elevation of about 11,000 feet, bearing a valuable stand of bunch grasses and grazed over by sheep. Injurious popula- tions of bruneri existed there in 1936-1938. During the first 5 days of September 1937, poison bait was carried up to the sheep range by pack mules and spread by hand. Later in 1937 a survey indicated that approximately 2,000 acres carried a population of 20 adults per square yard. A visit made by Nevada entomologists during 1938 coincided with a hail storm, and it was estimated that half of the large population then existing was killed by the hail and cold. No detailed food-plant studies of bruneri have been reported, but the general ecology is rather well known. Morse (1908) described the species (as alaskanus) as the dominant Melanoplus on Isle Royale, Mich., and recorded it from clearings, along trails, rock ridges, the EXPLANATION OF Ficure 11 Posterior view of male subgenital plate (except ¢(4), which is ventroposterior view). a: Melanoplus bruneri: 1, 2 from Ft. McLeod, Alberta, Canada (2 specimens); 3, 4 from Mt. Moriah, Nev. (2 specimens); 5, from Crook Co., Wyo. b: M. borealis stupefactus: 1, lectotype; 2, 4, 5, 6, from Mineral Co., Colo. (4 specimens); 3, from Los Pinos, Colo.; 7, from Silverton, Colo. c: M. borealis borealis: 1, from Nain, Labrador, Canada; 2, 3, from Cummington, Mass. (2 specimens). d: M. borealis palaceus: 1, 2, 4, from Lakeview area, Mont. (3 specimens); 3, topotype; 5, holotype (x, rectangular vertical area). e: M. borealis utahensis: 1, holotype; 2, from Big Cottonwood Canyon, Utah; 3, from Ogden, Utah; 4, ventroposterior view of same specimen as 3. ‘: Intermediate between M. borealis utahensis and M. borealis palaceus, 3 miles north of Mantua, Utah. GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS Ficure 11.—Explanation on facing page. 477119 —59——__4 49 50 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 ‘ } 9 ? rs \ / —& y - \ Pye Sia VI Ficure 12.—Distribution of male specimens of Melanoplus bruneri examined from Alaska and Canada. beach heath zone, and other environments. Hebard (1925a, p. 114) stated that in the United States bruneri is strictly sylvan, living in brushy forest undergrowth, and that this contrasts with the preferred habitat in the Chilcotin District, British Columbia. In the latter area Treherne and Buckell reported that bruneri normally lives “among rank-growing grasses and plants growing under the aspen poplar groves which often form belts separating the open range from the timbered hills,” also that it sometimes advances into open glades and small mountain meadows where vegetation is thick and green. Probably on the basis of these observations, Buckell (1921), in a summary of ecological preferences of Chilcotin Orthoptera, classified brunert as a semi-sylvan species which extends into the geophilous campestrian area where the open range adjoins the forest. The described Chilcotin habitat seems comparable to the Lake Upsilon, N. Dak., habitat where Hubbell (1922) found bruneri “quite common in a dry clearing covered with low bushes and shrubs of various kinds (Corylus rostrata, young aspens, willows, birches, etc.) and tall her- baceous plants such as fireweed and goldenrod, interspersed with small, grassy areas.” In the prairie provinces of Canada the habits of bruneri are similar to those reported by Buckell (1921). In the Cypress Hills plateau of southeastern Alberta, as well as in the foot- hills of western Alberta, where the open grasslands are replaced rather suddenly by coarse plants, low shrubs, and aspen poplar leading to the evergreen forest, bruneri just as suddenly replaces bilituratus as the dominant species. Similarly, grassy clearings within the forest margin in the Prince Albert-Whitefox area of Saskatchewan are 51 GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS “SaTPEOO] saqvIg peru) wWory pouruexs tusundq Ssnpdouvjayy Jo suauutoads aye Jo uornqiysiq—¢] AUNTY Br 52 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 populated mostly by bilituratus while the margins of those clearings support bruneri. Hebard (1930) remarked on the very different habitat preferences of bruneri and bilituratus (mexicanus), and this distinction was also brought out by Handford (1946, p. 172). The ‘rather hot and dry valley fields” where Fulton (1930) found brunerz in Oregon probably were adjacent to sylvan conditions. Specimens of bruneri (10 o’, 9 9) in the Philadelphia collections, from Red Banks in Logan Canyon, Utah, apparently are those referred to by Hebard (1936b, p. 173) as M. utahensis, said to be abundant in areas of “cow cabbage” (Wyethia amplexicaulis Nutt.) Nymphs of bruneri have been illustrated by Handford (1946), who found that they resembled darker nymphs, at least, of dbilituratus bilituratus (~mezxicanus) in every respect. In northern Michigan adults of brunert are not abundant until the beginning of August (Hebard, 1909). It has been suggested (Canad. Insect Pest Rev., vol. 33, p. 10, 1955) that since the 1954 outbreak in parts of British Columbia seemed related to one in 1952, while the 1953 infestation was light, the life cycle there may occupy two years. Collection dates on the great majority of specimens examined are in August and late July. Some of the more limital dates are as follows: Francis Lake, British Columbia, July 5; Castleton, Utah, July 5; Chilcotin, British Columbia, Aug .1; 37 miles southeast of Fairbanks, Alaska, Sept. 1; Drain, Oreg., Sept. 11; Therma, N. Mex., Sept. 12; Gallatin Canyon, Mont., Oct. 3. Some of the altitudes (in feet) on labels of specimens examined are as follows: Evergreen, Idaho, 3,600; Strawberry Mts., Oreg., 4,450; McCall, Idaho, 5,000-5,050; Jackson Hole, Wyo., 6,500; Fishers Peak, Colo., 7,000-8,000; Cascade Canyon, Teton National Park, Wyo., 9,000; southwest base of Delano Peak, Utah, 10,000; Mt. Wheeler, Ney., 10,000-10,600; Mt. Lincoln, Colo., 11,000—13,000. Melancoplus spretus (Walsh) Ficures 1,f; 2,n; 3,a; 7,6; 10,a,v; 14; 15,a,d; 16,a; Plate 2,p Caloptenus spretus Walsh, Pract. Ent., vol. 2, p. 1, 1866 (Highland, Kansas). Neotype here designated: Male labeled ‘‘Lawrence, Kans. June 18, 1877, Geo. F. Gaumer’”’ (USNM). Caloptenus spretus caeruleipes Cockerell, Entomologist, vol. 22, p. 127, 1889 (probably Glencoe, Nebr., where observations by Dodge (1878) presumably were made). The condition of the neotype is excellent, with colors well preserved and all appendages present. The aedeagus and epiphallus have been exposed as dry preparations still attached to the body (see figs. 3,a-2,3; 10,2). The subgenital plate and cercus are shown in figures 16,a-2 and 7,b-1. Measurements (in millimeters) are as follows: GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS a} Length of body, 26.5; tegmen, 23.0; hind femur, 12.5; extent of tegmen posterior to apex of hind femur, 9.0; pronotum, 4.6. The E/F ratio (length of tegmen divided by length of hind femur; see comments on p. 6) is 1.840. The general coloration is light brown, the head with gena rather pale and postocular dark bar distinct; antenna reddish brown; dorsum of occiput with broken, indistinct longitudinal dark streaks; tegmen with dark flecks in basal half only; hind femur with three transverse blackish bars (exclusive of knees) primarily on mesal half of dorsal surface; hind tibia and tarsus pale red, spines, claws, and apical half of spurs black. Five additional males and one female examined bear the same data as the neotype. The locality where the neotype was collected, Lawrence (Douglas Co.), Kans., is about 65 miles south of the type locality, Highland (Doniphan Co.), Kans. George F. Gaumer, the collector of the neotype, was a special assistant to the U.S. Entomo- . logical Commission who worked in Kansas in 1877. He has reported (Gaumer, 1878) that on June 16, 1877, he observed locusts flying over the Wakarusa River (which is about 3 miles south of Lawrence). He observed them on June 18 also, and, though a precise locality is not described, it can be inferred that the same general locality was involved. The locusts were seen flying in a north-northeast direction, and at 5 p.m. many specimens dropped to the ground. This informa- tion published by Gaumer explains the probable background of the historic specimen chosen as neotype. Walsh (1866) did not give a formal description of spretus, though he gave various characters and compared it to M. femur-rubrum, and he attributed the specific name to Uhler, who Walsh said had given the locust the name Caloptenus spretus without describing it. Since no published proposal of the name by Uhler was made, the name dates from Walsh. Walsh had specimens which were sent to him by Prof. W.S. Robertson of the Indian Orphan Institute, Highland, Kans. Since he did not consider that he was describing spretus as new, pos- sibly specimens were not preserved, at any rate no such specimens nor further references to them have been found, in spite of an examina- tion of the principal historic collections of Melanoplus. In case specimens were preserved in the Walsh collection, they probably were destroyed in 1871, when the Walsh material was burned in the great Chicago fire (Burks, 1953, p. 16). Since no type is known to exist, in spite of efforts to locate one, selection of a neotype is advisable. This is especially true because spretus is of great historic importance. It has not been collected recently, and old specimens are scattered in many collections, and eventually the number of good examples may become scarce. The name caeruleipes was proposed by Cockerell (1889) for the VOL. 110 OF “SOT PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM 54 (I6BI)Aajry wor Pajdopo snjaids JO uol\Ngiaysig x OTT uoibay Asosodway (coioy juaudwuadqns —..— uoibay juauowdag | " snjaids we wt JO,OISOABP ‘W + ‘Z| ‘BI4 area ay! GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 55 variety “‘of spretus with blue hind tibiae.”” He referred to material reported by Dodge (1878), but no types are known to exist, and probably none was set aside. It was previously reported (Riley, et al., 1878, p. 47) that some specimens of spretus had blue hind tibiae, and it appears clear that no nominal significance should be attached to such individuals. Scudder (1897b, p. 185) placed caeruleipes Cockerell in the synonymy of spretus, and Hebard (1925a, p. 113) referred to the synonymy. Melanoplus spretis—originally described in Acridiuwm and credited to Uhler by Thomas (1865) but in reality described by Thomas him- self because Uhler had published no description—is of uncertain identity and the source of some confusion in the literature. No type specimens of spretis were mentioned by Frison (1927) or Hebard (1927). Riley, et al. (1878, pp. 43-44), stated that there must have been some mistake in the description, and that the original speci- mens of spretis were destroyed soon after the paper was written. The name spretis occasionally has been used in the sense of the Rocky Mountain grasshopper, as when Rehn (1900) recorded it from Mexico, following which Hebard (1917; 1932a, p. 289) pointed out the misidentification of mezxicanus. Scudder (1897b, p. 185) treated spretis Thomas as a synonym of spretus Walsh, and Hebard (1934b, p. 197) did likewise. Earlier, however, Hebard (1925a, p. 113) considered spretis a synonym of atlanis Riley. He appears to have overlooked the fact that spretis antedated atlanis by 11 years! Thomas (1865) stated that spretis was quite common in Illinois, which we believe was untrue of spretus, and it would seem that Melanoplus bilituratus was involved. The measurements given by Thomas apply fully as well to spretus as to Illinois specimens of bilituratus, however. Thomas (1878) credited spretus (sic!) to him- self and referred to the Illinois State Agricultural Report. Because of uncertainties over the identity of spretis, and the confusion with spretus if both names were to be retained for distinct populations, it is best to treat Acridium spretis Thomas 1865 as unrecognizable. Seudder (1878b) was the first to assign spretus to the genus Melanoplus. Descriptive notes: A large, long-winged member of the mezi- canus group (pl. 2,p). Head with fastigium comparatively far in advance of compound eyes; the dorsal carinae of vertex less prom- inent and farther apart than in mezicanus; eyes less rounded and bulging than in mezicanus; especially in male; pronotum (fig. 15,@) with strangulate narrowing of sides in front of principal transverse sulcus, this conspicuous on lower portions of lateral lobes; in lateral view the principal sulcus lower than remainder of median carina; mesosternal hump well developed in male, absent in female. 56 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 rE se are SE ae ste cor ary f bs Laat apace? wel Kas eal Se Water fet ae Ficure 15.—a, }, Dorsal view of pronotum, with grid to show extent of constriction: a, M. Spretus, male, Pueblo, Colo.; b, M. bilituratus oulturnus, Wellington, Kans. c, d, Lateral view of: c, M. bilituratus oulturnus, Wellington, Kans.; d, M. spretus, male, Pueblo, Colo. GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 5% Mate GeEniTatia: Cercus (fig. 7,5) broad for group, the apex oblique at ventral side; subgenital plate (fig. 16,@) strongly upturned, twin apices (posterior view) well developed; aedeagus (figs. 2,n; 3,a) with dorsal valve extending laterally more than anteriorly, and re- curved dorsally and posteriorly, conspicuously concave on posterior surface, the apex of valve (dorsally) membranous; accessory lobe comparatively elongate; apex of aedeagus dorsally produced beyond dorsal valve. FEMALE genitalia: Cercus slightly more robust and blunt than in mexicanus; dorsal valve of ovipositor with “scoop” well developed, the dorsal shoulder at base angular. CotoraTIon: General coloration relatively dark for group. Hind femur with four dark transverse dorsal bands (including knee), inner paginal area rich yellowish, occasionally tinged with pinkish, outer paginal area yellowish to light brown, paler along ventral margin, ventral surface yellowish, the outerhalf tinged with pink; hind tibia usually red; tegmen with conspicuous blackish flecks; wing trans- parent, with faint tinges of yellowish near base. (Brett, 1947, p. 33, reported that of 100 specimens of spretus he examined in the Bruner Collection, University of Nebraska, 85 percent had red hind tibiae and 15 percent glaucous or pale hind tibiae.) Variation: The size of 14 representative males, measured in milli- meters, varies in pronotal length from 4.2 to 5.5 (av. 4.8), in hind femur from 11.5 to 14.2 (av. 13.0), and in tegmen from 19.0 to 26.0 (av. 22.8). Seven measured females vary in pronotal length from 4.8 to 5.4 (av. 5.1), in hind femur from 13.2 to 15.2 (av. 14.2), and in tegmen from 23.0 to 25.5 (av. 24.6). No correlation between size differences and geographic distribution has been recognized. The extent to which the tegmen extends posteriorly beyond the apex of hind femur varies from 4.5 to 10 mm., with an average of about 7 mm. for males examined. For females, extremes of 5, and 10, and an average of about 8 mm. occur. Measurements by Riley, et al. (1878, pp. 47-49), are not compa- rable to the present ones because the former concern the distances that various body structures exceed others. Faure’s (1933) measure- ments are expressed in averages only. His averages for length of tegmen are higher than ours, perhaps because more distance at the very base of the tegmen was included through not using the method later recommended by the International’ Locust Conference (see p. 6 of the present paper). Of the males seen, there is none with pale hind tibiae which may not owe the lack of pigmentation to immersion in fluid. The hind tibiae of two or three of the. females seem to be pale from original coloration, though fading is suggested by some of the oldest specimens. 58 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Furculae vary from straight to markedly divergent. Very little variation in the male cercus has been seen. The aedeagus seldom varies much, except in appearance due to shriveling from drying. The apical portion of the main stem shrivels considerably and often is smaller and somewhat distorted when dry. The apical valve usually is heavily and darkly sclerotized, extending decidedly more laterally and posteriorly, like “horns,” in dry than wet preparations. In wet preparations the apical membrane of the dorsal valve is much more noticeable, decreasing the hornlike appearance. The dorsal valve occasionally is well anterior of the apex of the main stem, but fre- quently, especially in dry preparations, extends laterad of the apex. The apex of the ventral valve sometimes extends out from the main stem, but usually is tightly appressed to the anteriobasal portion of the aedeagus. The accessory lobe usually shrivels and has little dis- tinctive shape following drying. DistriputTion: The map (fig. 14) shows the distribution of males examined which have precise locality data. Males with only State labels are from Montana and New Mexico, as well as from eight other States and Provinces from which there are precise data. Females examined which add significantly to the distribution shown by males are from Taos Peak, N. Mex., only. The Permanent, Subpermanent, and Temporary Regions (fig. 14) in the sense of the U. S. Entomolog- ical Commission, are adapted from Riley (1891). Riley (1877) and Riley, et al. (1880), also mapped the distribution of spretus. It was frankly stated by Riley and his associates that various details as presented on their maps were based on fragmentary data and so should be taken as tentative only. Many early records of spretus are un- supported by specimens, so there is no way of checking identifications. It seems possible that some early Nevada records may be attributable EXPLANATION OF FicurE 16 Subgenital plate of male, in lateral view. Melanoplus spretus: 1, from Argentine Pass, Colo., July 16, 1877; 2, neotype. M. bilituratus defectus, Casa Grande, Ariz. M. borealis stupefactus, Los Pinos, Colo. M. borealis borealis: 1, from Cummington, Mass.; 2, from Churchill, Manitoba, Canada; 3, from Pikes Peak, Colo. e: M. borealis palaceous: 1, holotype; 2, topotype; 3, from Lakeview area, Mont.; 4, from Cedar Breaks, Utah. Ff: M. borealis utahensis: 1, holotype; 2, from Ogden, Utah; 3, from Big Cottonwood Canyon, Utah. g: Intermediate between M. borealis utahensis and M. b. palaceus: 1, 2, from 3 miles north of Mantua, Utah (2 specimens). h: M. bruneri: 1, from Ft. McLeod, Alberta, Canada; 2, from Chilcotin, British Columbia, Canada; 3, from Drain, Oregon; 4, from Mt. Moriah, Nev. LR SS GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 59 ees, Some. IOC awae, AS RIS Aw Ficure 16.—Explanation on facing page. 60 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 to the Nevada sage grasshopper, Melanoplus rugglesi Gurney. For instance, Riley, et al. (1880, p. 7), included the following paragraph: This year [1878], as well as 1877, was a locust year in this sparsely settled territory. July 11 great numbers appeared at Winnemucca, and disappeared the 13th; on the 18th and 19th swarms again appeared. (United States Weather Report). Since the season of the year noted above is normal for rugglesi, and Winnemucca is in the same area through which swarms of rugglesi passed in the late 1940’s, also since rugglesi could have been mistaken for spretus by local observers, it seems quite possible that rugglesi is the species responsible for the report quoted. Specimens of Melanoplus spretus examined, with full locality label data except State names: Canapa: Rosebank, Manitoba, (1 @, 1 9);!Aweme, Manitoba, July {19, 1902, N. Criddle (1 @, 1 2); Fairfax, July, J. Fletcher (1 &#, 1 2);* Boissevain, Manitoba, Aug. 26, 1879 (1 @); Delorain (Manitoba), July 8, 1898 (1 #, 1 9); Manitoba, Aug. 28, 1877 (1 @); Arctic America, R. Kennicott, S. H. Scudder cn Minnesota: Glyndon, Aug. 1877 (1 9); Glyndon, Clay Co., July 1, 1875 (1 2); Minneapolis, Aug. 16, 1877 (2 @); ‘‘Minnesota,” Oct. 6, 1876 (38 ¢,6 9). Norty Daxorta: Bismark, July 23, 1877, Geo. W. Sweet (4 o', 1 2); Clifford, Traill Co., July 25, 1891 (2 &); Larimore, July 29, 1901 (1 &); Turtle Mts.® (1 #, 2 9); “N. Dakota,”’ July, 1900 (1 ¢&). Montana: “Mont” (1 ¢, 19). Iowa: Ackley, Sept. 1, 1877 (2 @); Dallas Co., Aug., Allen (1 9); Harrison Co., Aug. 4, 1873 (1 co); Monona Co., Aug. 1873 (1 92); “Iowa,” June 1877 (1 &). NEBRASKA: Lincoln, June 28, 1893, 1,150 ft., Bruner (1 @); Red Willow Post Office, Aug. 1874, John Byfield (1 &); ‘“‘Nebr.” 1868 (3 o, 1 92); “Nebr.” 1874 (3 o&, 2 Q). Wromine: Alkali St(ation), 6,000 ft., July 27, 1877 (1 @, 1 9); Steele, “fiying from S. &S. W.,” July i879, C. A. H. McCauley (1 @); Steele, July 1878 (1 &); Steele, July 1879 (1 9); “Wyo. Terr.” (1 &). Ura: Salt Lake Valley, 4,300 ft., Aug. 1-4, 1877 (3 @); Salt Lake, Aug. 16 (1 9); Salt Lake (1 9). Cotorapo: Argentine Pass, 13,000 ft., July 16, 1877 (2 =); Arapahoe Peak, 11-12,000 ft., Packard (2 @); Boulder, July 19, 1877 (2 &); Colorado Springs, July 1878 (1 o), July 26, 1877 (2 ¢, 2 9), July 21, 1877 (1 9), Aug. 1, 1877 (1 9), July 1877 (2 2); near Denver, L. Agassiz (1 @); Georgetown, 85—9,500 ft., July 12-13, 1877 (1 &, 29); Mt. Lincoln, above timber, 11-13,000 ft., Aug. 138, 1877 (2 9); Pueblo, July 8-9, 1877 (1 &); White River, Aug. 6, 1877, Mrs. E. H. Danforth (1 9); “Colorado,” July 1877 (1 @); “‘Colorado,” H. V. Morrison (1 &). 4 These specimens probably are part of the ‘‘enormous numbers” of spretus reported by Mitchener (1954, p. 50) to have been found at Fairfax, Manitoba, July 4, 1S01, by James Fletcher. 5 Probably collected by Kennicott in the Winnipeg area of Manitoba, as discussed by Scudder (1897b, p. 187), the Scudder name on the label probably referring only to the Scudder collection. ‘These Turtle Mt. specimens probably sre from the same source as a large collection preserved at the University of Nebraska and reported by Brett (1947, p. 14) as collected by Lawrence Bruner in the early 1880’s. O.S. Bare (in litt., Dec. 19, 1946) has informed us that M. S. Swenk once told him that the Turtle Mt. series was collected about 1890 GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 61 New Mexico: Taos Pk., 13,000 ft. (1 9); ““N. Mexico,” July 21, 1877 (1 &), July 21, 1877 (1 9). Missouri: Sarcoxie, July 10, 1877 (2 9); Jackson Co., 1874 (2 9); Jasper Co., Nov. 12, 1876 (1 o', 1 9); Johnson Co., 1874 (1 @, 19); “N. Mo.,” 1868 (1 &); “Central Mo.,” 1874 (1 9); Holt Co., 1868 (2 9). Kansas: Cawker City, 1874, N. B. Freeland (1 @, 19); Lawrence, June 18, 1877, Geo. F. Gaumer (6 o’, one the neotype, 1 9); Manhattan, Nov, 1876 (3 9), 1874, W. C. Howard (2 @); Salina, Oct. 1877 (1 #@, 1 9); Douglas Co., Oct. 1877, G. F. Gaumer (1 @, 1 9); ‘“‘Kans.,”’ 1874 (2 #, 2 2), 1876 (1 2), Nov. 1876 (1 #, 2 9). Texas: Near Brenham, 1868, Thos. Affleck (1 9); Calvert, devouring kernels of corn, J. F. Moulton, Jr. (1 o@); Dallas, Boll? (1 &); Salado, May 1877, J. H. Myers (1 9); “Texas,” Belfrage 7 (1 6, 1 9); ‘‘Texas, common every- where, has been very destructive in this and adjoining counties, the past few years,” Belfrage (1 2); “‘Texas,” Pope, May 15 (1 9); “Texas” 1868 (1 9). Locality uncertain: An original Uhler specimen, probably sent to Scudder by Uhler, belonging to the Museum of Comparative Zoology, with a round pink disk, also the labels, ‘“‘Collection of P. R. Uhler’’; “S. H. Seudder Coll’’; ‘“‘Mel- anoplus spretus Scudder’s Type, 1895”; ‘‘Caloptenus spretus Uhler NRR mi- gratory” (1 o) (manuscript notes from the late H. S. Barber include a list of abbreviations given him by Uhler; NRR meant “North Red River’’; also see Scudder (1897b, p. 187)). BIoLoGy AND ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE: Prior to 1885 the literature dealing with the Rocky Mountain grasshopper probably was more extensive than that then available concerning any other single native American insect. Since there is no recently gathered information and it is impossible to sift facts from opinions in much of the volumin- ous early record, the biology of spretus will be reviewed briefly. The most important references on biology are those of Packard (1877), Riley (1876, 1877a, 1877b, 1891), and Riley, et al. (1878, 1880, 1883). There is a great deal of repetition in those reports, and Riley’s sum- mary (1891, pp. 9-26) is recommended. When Cyrus Thomas began the field study of spretus in 1869 (Riley, et al., 1880, p. 73), he believed from the first year’s observations that the species was essentially sedentary, but later he and the other commissioners decided that it was predominantly migratory. Areas inhabited were defined as follows (Riley, 1891, map; and elsewhere): Permanent Region, or native breeding grounds, where the species is always found in greater or less abundance; Subpermanent Region, which the species frequently invades, in which it can perpetuate itself for several years, but from which in time it disappears; Temporary Region, or that only periodically visited, and from which the species disappears within a year (see map, fig. 14). Riley, et al. (1878, 1880), supposed portions of Canada (then cus- tomarily referred to as Arctic America, or British America) to be an 7G. W. Belfrage (1834-1882) and Jacob Boll (1828-1880), both well-known early collectors in Texas. Bel- frage collected most in Bosque and McLennan Counties. 62 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 important part of the Permanent Region, but it is not clear how important a part. Walker (1910, p. 336) summarized distributional findings of the U. S. Entomological Commission for Canada, so far as the ‘‘Regions” were concerned, but he added little new information. Criddle (1917), perhaps basing an opinion on observations during years long after the main outbreak period, said that ‘invasions of Canada” occurred only during dry seasons, the swarms arriving in July and August. Roe (1951), in his discussion of the buffalo, said that in the 1870’s and 1880’s there was quite common ignorance of western Canada. It may have been easy to ascribe the source of something poorly understood (i. e., swarms of spretus) to a vast, distant region that was little known entomologically. Within the Permanent Region, spretus did not breed everywhere, but instead it did so in favorable spots. River bottoms, sunny slopes of uplands, and subalpine grassy areas among the mountains were considered to be favored egg-laying sites. After maturity was reached, flights within the Permanent Region were common. More devastating and consequently much more widely publicized, however, were the “invading swarms” which went primarily in a southerly or southeasterly direction (except when west of the Rocky Moun- tains). A day’s flight was estimated to be from 20 to 150 miles. Stops were usually made at night, but not always. During brief stops, or when settled in an area for egg-laying, the swarms ate nearly all crops and wild plants. Swarms might stop anywhere in the Temporary Region. Riley (1877b, p. 95) stated that in 1876 swarms left Montana about the middle of July and reached Texas by the end of September, thus covering 1,500 miles in 75 days, an average of 20 miles per day. Swarms developing from eggs laid in the Temporary Region usually migrated northward or northwestward. In the southern part of the infested area a partial second generation sometimes occurred, but spretus had essentially a single generation per year. The time of hatching, as a general rule, varied from the middle to end of March in Texas, to the middle of May or beginning of June in Montana. The young grasshoppers typically displayed gregarious habits soon after hatching and initial feeding near the hatching site. The nymphs were described as moving in “schools or armies,” generally ‘‘marching in a given direction until toward evening” (Riley, 1891, p. 21). Sometimes the nymphs migrated in a band a mile wide across the front (Riley, 1877b, p. 233). Usually, marching occurred only during the warm hours of the day. Melanoplus spretus was considered to be nearly omnivorous on both native and cultivated plants, with vegetables and cereals a “main- stay,”’ though at least in some instances sorghum and broom corn GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 63 were left untouched (Riley, et al. 1878, p. 251). No thorough analysis of preferences among the native food plants of the Permanent Region seems to have been made, leading Pfadt (1949, p. 39) to conclude that there is no information concerning the food-plants on which spretus originally developed. During the years when it was more or less prevalent, spretus varied considerably in its abundance and destructiveness. Riley (1891, p. 10) gave a résumé of the relative abundance between 1818 and 1888. Bethune (1875) briefly described the early destructive outbreaks in Manitoba, and a recent summary is by Mitchener (1954). Some of the summaries of experience with grasshoppers in various States, such as that of Smith (1954) for Kansas and of Munro (1949) for North Dakota, have not always differentiated between various species, as of course it is impossible to do for many of the early years. Schle- becker (1953) has given perspective to the general subject of grass- hopper outbreaks, and has reviewed the period of great damage by spretus. The year 1866, when the Rocky Mountain grasshopper did great damage in Kansas, Nebraska, northwestern Texas, and also invaded western Missouri, is described as one of the first years in which it attracted national attention. The years of greatest abun- dance were 1873-1876, with 1874 the high point in destructiveness. In 1874, Colorado, Nebraska, and Kansas were overrun, and parts of Wyoming, the Dakotas, Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas were ravaged by swarms from Montana and Canada where they were abundant (Riley, 1891). As recorded by Riley, et al. (1880), and recalled by Bruner (1883), infestations dwindled in 1877. Widespread abundance of spretus never occurred again, though some injury in various years of the 1880’s is attributed to it, including an important local outbreak in Otter Tail Co., Minn., in 1888. None of the 1888 specimens is preserved, so far as known (Hebard, 1932b, p. 37). Riley, et al. (1883), mapped the reported hatching and flights of 1880 and 1881. Bruner (1893) reported spretus present in many parts of middle and eastern Nebraska in 1892, and quite common at Lincoln, Nebr. It is probable that the layers of spretus in Grasshopper Glacier, Park Co., Mont., were deposited during the major recorded swarming years for spretus, or in earlier years that were comparable, though not recorded. This glacier, located near the northeastern corner of Yellowstone National Park, has been discussed in detail by Gurney (1953). Flights of grasshoppers, probably aided by favorable air currents, occasionally pass over the glacier, even at its altitude of nearly 11,000 feet, and specimens landing on the snow are preserved when the necessary subsequent conditions of freezing and snowfall occur. Several species have been collected alive on the snow of the 64 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM YOL. 110 glacier in recent years, but spretus is the only species identified from the remains imbedded in layers here and there in the glacier, and sometimes conspicuous on the vertical face at the foot. Preserved samples have long been supposed to be spretus, but during the period when spretus was considered a migratory phase of mezicanus, and before the critical features of the aedeagus were known, the samples were not identifiable other than as mexicanus (as then called). Study of the aedeagus of specimens now shows the samples in the U. S. National Museum to be spretus; unfortunately, this had not been done when the 1953 glacier paper was published. Prior to 1898, grasshoppers were known to be preserved in the glacier, and they were first examined and identified as spretus in 1914. The rather fragmen- tary samples now at the U. S. National Museum represent 13 speci- mens, from which two males taken in 1949 by Dr. J. R. Parker and one taken in 1952 by Dr. Irving Friedman have been dissected and found to be spretus. The dorsal valve of those males is well pre- served and typical. Fragments of grasshoppers collected from the central and bottom portions of the glacier in 1952 by Dr. Friedman, of the U. S. Geological Survey, were sent by him to W. F. Libby, then of the Institute for Nuclear Studies and Department of Chemis- try, University of Chicago, for age determination by the carbon—14 method. Dr. Libby reported (in litt., Apr. 15, 1953) that the results indicated an age of 45 + 300 years and that the limits of error were 45 + 600 years. He has since reported (Libby, 1954) the age as 45 + 150 years. ‘The specimens are thus indicated as quite modern, and the likelihood is that the layers of preserved spretus are not more than 200 years old, perhaps much younger. Various writers at about the turn of the century remarked on the strange disappearance of spretus. Cooley’s (1904a) experience of not capturing a specimen during five years of collecting in all parts of Montana was typical. Except for the Grasshopper Glacier material, the only specimens collected since 1890 that we have examined are from Clifford, N. Dak., 1891; Lincoln, Nebr., 1893; Delorain, Mani- toba, 1898; ‘“North Dakota,” 1900; Larimore, N. Dak., 1901; Fairfax, Manitoba, apparently 1901; Aweme, Manitoba, 1902.8 Rehn and Hebard (1906, p. 408) and Hebard (1928, p. 283; 1929, p. 390) recorded three specimens (as spretus) which Hebard collected at Pike’s Peak and near Manitou, Colo., in 1904. The single male, from Pike’s Peak, on examination of the aedeagus, proves to be M. bilituratus bilituratus. Thus, spretus is not known to have existed since 1902. Why spretus disappeared and whether it is extinct are unknown. Riley, et al. (1883), included a long discussion by Lawrence Bruner, 8 All these latest records are represented by males. Aweme, where Norman Criddle lived and worked for many years, is near Treesbank, and about 15 to 20 miles southwest of Carberry, Manitoba. GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 65 the foremost American field student of grasshoppers of his time, of factors of weather, natural enemies, and other influences thought to be related to spretus abundance, but the enigma remains. Cantrall and Young (1954) hinted at an influence by the American buffalo: “Tt is obvious that any disturbance in a habitat is accompanied by population fluctuations with the increase of some species and the decrease of others. The appearance of the migratory locust, Melano- plus mexicanus migratory phase spretus, following reduction of the great buffalo herds may be a classical example of the phenomenon.” We have examined the well-documented reports of Hornaday (1889) and Roe (1951) in an effort to determine whether there is a chrono- logical correlation between the disappearance of the buffalo and the abundance or disappearance of spretus. So far as the southern herd, centered in Kansas and adjacent States, is concerned, the last hunting on a large scale occurred during the winter of 1875-1876. In 1871, by which time much attention already had been attracted to the migration of spretus, millions of buffalo remained in Kansas, Okla- homa, and the Texas Panhandle. The northern herd, located mainly in Wyoming, Montana, and the Dakotas, was slaughtered later than the southern one. The years 1878-1883 were the biggest hunting years, with the last major hunt in the season (about October—Febru- ary) of 1882-1883. Therefore, in Montana, which was the heart of the Permanent Region for spretus, the peak of grasshopper outbreaks had passed (1877) before the buffalo herd was removed. After considering possible effects of the buffalo in feeding and trampling on the range, and the feeding by young nymphs on dry buffalo manure, it is difficult to see any relation other than near chronological coinci- dence between grasshopper and buffalo. Uvarov (1921) advanced the “phase theory” of locusts, which later became generally accepted as a fact, and Hebard (1925a, pp. 112, 113; 1928, pp. 281-284) suggested that spretus might be the migratory phase of mexicanus. Faure (1933) concluded, following rearing experi- ments, that he had demonstrated that nymphs of bilituratus [mezi- canus] could change into spretus, thus establishing the phase explana- tion. However, the measurements of his laboratory-reared “‘spretus’’ are not fully typical of the historical specimens of spretus, and his demonstration was not conclusive (Hebard, 1936c, p. 48). Brett (1947) also believed that by regulating the food and laboratory environment of growing nymphs he had produced “spretus.”’ His material, samples of which have been deposited in the U. S. National Museum, shows considerable variation in wing length, but the aedeagi of all the males seen are ascribable to M. bilituratus vulturnus, and no approach to the aedeagus of spretus is shown. If spretus were a 477119—59——_5 66 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 phase of bilituratus, it might be supposed that during the fairly ex- tensive flights of the 1930’s, as reported by Parker, et al. (1955), there would have been signs of spretus development. But such was not the case, and now, in the light of aedeagal characters here dis- cussed, it seems that bilituratus and spretus are distinct species. Nevertheless, for 25 years the view that spretus is the migratory phase of bilituratus [mexicanus] had considerable acceptance (Hebard, 1929, 1931, 1936c; Gurney, 19538, p. 314, pl. 7, fig. p; Parker, et al., 1955). Brett (1947) felt that settlement of spretus breeding grounds for farming and grazing was responsible in some way for the disappearance of the grasshoppers. Impressed by short-winged specimens reared on alfalfa, he also stressed a possible correlation between the increase in alfalfa acreage and spretus decline. Pfadt (1949, p. 39) expressed doubt that alfalfa was a major factor and implied that the little available information concerning preferred native food plants of spretus is an inadequate basis for any general conclusions explaining the disappearance. We have failed to learn of any pronounced range-plant changes in Montana during the 1860’s, 1870’s, or 1880’s, so far as the general disappearance or replacement of plant species is concerned. (See Andrewartha and Birch (1954, esp. pp. 594-600) for a discussion of conditions related to population fluctuations.) The irregular periodicity of historic spretus swarms, the apparently nearly omnivorous appetite and very long-winged condition of swarming adults, and the marching behavior of nymphal bands suggest the occurrence of a migratory phase. If this view is correct, spretus probably had a solitary phase which occurred in relatively localized colonies, possibly adapted to a specialized environment. There is the example of Melanoplus rugglesi, which in the Great Basin attracted widespread attention for about 13 years (1939-1952) as a migratory phase. Previously, rugglest had been virtually unknown, and at present the solitary phase is scarcely found except by ento- mologists acquainted with the specialized habitat of the small localized colonies. A handicap in studying the possible correlation of weather conditions and spretus abundance is a shortage of reliable weather records, prior to 1886, for such Western States as Montana. Criddle (1917) discussed the former prevalence of spretus, and added: “At present, however, the insect seems to have vanished completely. Indeed, there are some who would place it with the Passenger Pigeon as an object of the past. It seems almost incomprehensible, however, that such can be the case. More probably the real permanent breeding grounds are more restricted than was supposed, and the locust will yet be located either by the discovery of its real haunts or by a new invasion following favorable weather conditions for breeding purposes.’”’ One immediately wonders whether a solitary GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 67 phase of spretus still exists, and if so what are the most likely breeding places. Montana, east of the Continental Divide, and North Dakota would seem likely possibilities. A solitary phase of spretus, if it exists, probably is smaller and shorter-winged than the _ historic specimens, and the aedeagus may be the only reliable distinguishing character. It is possible that specimens of a solitary phase now exist in collections, but if so they have not been recognized. Popula- tions of the mexicanus group, both preserved specimens and field samples, should have the aedeagus examined critically on the chance that new evidence bearing on the spretus problem will be disclosed. Melanoplus borealis (Fieber) The distribution of this species is indicated by the two maps of its subspecies (figs. 17, 18) and, for the United States, by Newton and Gurney (1956, map 56). As the specific name suggests, this is a boreal insect, which in the United States is primarily northern or occurs in mountainous areas. Mostly on the basis of tegminal length and the shape of the male subgenital plate, four subspecies are here recognized. Our study of the aedeagus has failed thus far to show differences in the aedeagus among the subspecies. However, Hebard (1935a, p. 67), in writing of what he called the borealis group, stated: “Examination of the penis now shows that this organ is of the same general type in all of the recognized races but shows distinct proportionate differences in some.” Some differences in the epiphallus are here reported, but the examina- tion of more material is required before their significance can be fully evaluated. Melanoplus borealis borealis (Fieber) FicurgEs 3,3; 7,3; 8,f; 9,c; 10,c,l,s; 11,c; 16,d; 17; 18; PLate 5,a,B,pD. Caloptenus borealis Fieber, Lotus, vol. 3, p. 120, 1853 (unstated number of specimens from ‘‘(Grénland) Nord. Cap. (Labrador) M. Hal. Fieb.’”’). Lecto- type here designated: Male from original Fieber series (according to Dr. Max Beier, in litt., Jan. 17, 1957) with the following labels: ‘‘Podisma borealis Fieb. Gronl.’’; “Mus. Caes. Vindebon.’’; ‘det. Holdhaus Melanoplus borealis Fieb.”’; ‘‘Par.”’; ‘23’? (Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna). Pezotettix septentrionalis Saussure, Rev. Mag. Zool., p. 159, 1861 (unstated number of specimens from Labrador). Lectotype here designated: Female labeled “P. septentrionalis Sss. Type’’; ‘Labrador’; and with a lectotype label attached by Gurney (Museum d’Histoire Naturelle, Geneva). (The Saussure collection contains two series of septentrionalis, one consisting of lectotype, a second containing 17 specimens (15 from Labrador and 2 from “Hudson’’) (C. Ferriere, in litt., Jan. 23, 1957).) Caloptenus extremus Walker, Cat. Derm. Salt. B. M., Pt. 4, p. 681, 1870 (two females from “‘Arctic America”). Lectotype here designated: Female labeled Caloptenus extremus and as type, and with both hind legs present (British Museum). (The second original female lacks both hind legs. The lectotype 68 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VoL. 110 also bears an accessions registration label, ‘51/49,’ which is associated with the following notebook data: “District watered by Mackenzie and Slave R. Presented by Sir John Richardson.” (D. R. Ragge, in litt., Jan. 10, 25, 1957).) Pezotettix junius Dodge, Canad. Ent., vol. 8, pp. 9-10, 1876 (males, females, from Glencoe, Dodge Co., Nebr.). New synonymy. Lectotype here designated: Male labeled ‘‘Pez. Junius &G. M. Dodge Type; Collection C. V. Riley” (USNM). (A similarly labeled female is associated with the lectotype. Though no original locality label exists, Dodge stated that the species occurred at Glencoe, Nebr.) Caloptenus parvus Provancher, Nat. Canad., vol. 8, p. 110, 1876 (one male from Cap Rouge, Quebec [southern outskirts of Quebec City]). Lectotype here designated: The first of two males pinned in Provancher'’s first collection (Musée de la Province, Quebec). (N.—M. Comeau has reported (in litt., Jan. 8, 1957) that although a single specimen was originally mentioned, an 1877 catalog mentioned two, and that both are now in very good condition.) Melanoplus extremus scandens Scudder, Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, p. 289, pl. 1, fig. f, 1897 (unstated number of specimens from Big Horn Mountains, Wyo., and several localities in New England, as well as unstated localities ‘‘in the high north’). Lectotype here designated: Male labeled ‘‘White Mts. Alpine. Scudder, Drawn, Mel. extremus Scudder’s Type, 1895, Drawn for Ap- palachia, S. H. Scudder Coll., Type 15466” (MCZ). (Tegmina of lectotype extend 5 mm. behind the apex of abdomen. A female with similarly long tegmina bears the same data.) Melanoplus monticola Scudder, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. 36 (154), pp. 24, 34, 1897; Proc. U. 8S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, pp. 135, 290-291, pl. 19, fig. 5, 1897 (two males, two females from ‘‘above timber line on Sierra Blanca, Colo- rado’”’). New synonymy. Lectotype designated by Rehn and Hebard (1912, p. 84): The figured male (MCZ). (Only fragments of the lectotype remain. The second original male is at Philadelphia (ANSP); its subgenital plate is about as in fig. 16,d-2, in lateral view, and in posterior view two prom- inences are developed, much as in fig. 11,b-4.) The following four specimens of borealis were loaned from Vienna by Dr. Beier in addition to the lectotype: One nymph labeled as from Greenland; a female labeled Labrador, 1870; a female from Okak Islands, Labrador, 1838; a female from Nain, Labrador, 1832. The last two specimens bear labels reading ‘‘Coll. Br. v. W. Labrador, Coll. Sommer.’”’ M. C. Sommer was a Danish handler and collector of insects who died in 1868, from whom Brunner is recorded as ob- taining Orthoptera, and it seems probable that these are the female specimens from Labrador recorded by Brunner (1861, p. 223) as Caloptenus borealis. At the same time he recorded material from Valdivia [Chile], the latter doubtless being a misidentification. Brunner’s specimens may not have been available to Fieber in 1853, hence the lectotypic selection of the male which does not provide a clear type locality, though it unmistakably is the species currently called Melanoplus borealis (aedeagus exposed, preserved in dry condition). GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 69 There is no record of borealis from Greenland since Fieber. Henriksen and Lundbeck (1917) and Henriksen (1939) did not report it, and S. L. Tuxen of Copenhagen, who is familiar with current work on Greenland, has assured us (in litt., Jan. 26, 1957) that the Fieber record must be incorrect. No Acrididae have been taken on Green- land by Danish entomologists who in summer collect there regularly. Likewise there is no subsequent record of borealis from North Cape or elsewhere in Norway (Ander, 1949a, 1949b; Knaben, 1943), although Scudder (1897b, p. 272) assumed that Fieber’s locality ‘‘Nord. Cap.” is the one in Norway. Since Fieber included borealis in a treatment of European Orthoptera, and did not enclose the locality in parentheses, as he did the two non-European localities, it is fair to assume that he regarded North Cape, Norway, as one of his localities. On the other hand, there is North Cape, Prince Edward Island, and Cape North, Nova Scotia, which may have been unknown to him though ports of call for North Atlantic shipping. There is a strong probability that none of Fieber’s specimens originated in either Norway or Greenland. Therefore, no definite type locality can be recognized; the lectotype probably came from Labrador or nearby. No information is available about any Fieber material of borealis which may have been deposited at Halle, Germany; the main Fieber collection is in Vienna. The synonymy of septentrionalis was indicated by Scudder (1897b, p. 270) and later by Blatchley (1920, p. 424). Blatchley also treated extremus and parvus as synonyms of borealis. Essig (1926, p. 81) incorrectly listed extremus as a synonym of brunert. Hebard (1925a, p. 111) treated extremus as a synonym of borealis borealis, and he also placed scandens as a synonym of borealis junius. Scudder (1897b, p. 287) synonymized parvus under eztremus. His interpretation recognized parvus as the northern form with red color prominent on the hind legs rather than the pale type as represented by the synony- mous junius. It is in agreement with Provancher’s description of parvus, which refers to the red color on both hind femur and hind tibia. Hebard (1925a, p. 111) may have overlooked this feature of parvus, and thus was incorrect in regarding parvus as identical with junus. Both junius and parvus were described in 1876,-in journal issues of January and April, respectively, though actual dates of mailing have not been ascertained by us. The dates and the identity of parvus are important if in the future the southeastern population should be restored to subspecific rank. Scudder utilized what he believed to be differences in the shape of the apical part of the male subgenital plate to separate borealis, extremus and monticola, but his differences are not constant in series of specimens. His scandens consisted of individuals mainly from 70 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 high altitudes and was characterized by tegmina reaching somewhat beyond the apices of the hind femora, while in gunius the tegmina usually did not quite reach those apices. Hebard (1930, p. 397) noted that monticola is separated from typical borealis largely by shorter wings and tegmina, but he indicated that some far northern specimens would be assigned to borealis monticola if that character was followed, and he clearly was impressed by the local variation occurring in the Northwest. For the most part, specimens from the northeastern United States and southeastern Canada have the lower surfaces of the hind femora yellowish, and the hind tibiae are yellowish or dirty pale brown, while specimens from further north and the Rocky Mountains usually have the lower femoral surfaces and the hind tibiae reddish. Series from Ontario and Manitoba show inter- mediate conditions, and as a whole the populations represented by qunius and monticola do not seem sufficiently defined for their recogni- tion to serve a useful purpose. Hebard (1929, p. 387) said that borealis monticola was the least well defined of four races of borealis which he recognized, and (1932b, p. 37) he stated that gunius is a “very weakly defined race.” Later (Hebard 1934a, p. 105), he noted the difficulty of separating borealis junius and borealis borealis in northern Minnesota and suggested that junius might be merely a pallid color phase developed in response to a more temperate environ- ment. White and Rock (1941) recorded both borealis borealis and borealis junius from Alberta, and later (1945) recorded borealis monticola also. In 1945 they discussed variation and the problem of trying to justify the recognition of these subspecies. Blatchley (1920) and Morse (1920) have discussed the variation shown by borealis. Scudder (1897b, pp. 270, 272) placed Caloptenus arcticus Walker in the synonymy of borealis, with some uncertainty, and Blatchley (1920) did so definitely. This is now considered untrue, as here discussed under M. biltturatus bilituratus (p. 15). In Canada the junior author has recognized two races or ecological forms within borealis borealis. Specimens from Labrador, James Bay, Northwest Territories, northern Quebec and Ontario, northern Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta, and from British Columbia are heavier, darker, more discolored, with more evident spotting on the tegmina, and consistently higher tegmina/femur ratios in both long- and short-winged forms than the more southern counterparts. The form from the southern or grassland portion of the prairie provinces is smaller, generally pale brownish yellow, with tegminal spotting much reduced, and frequently with the hind femur entirely pale. A broad zone of transition between the two forms is evident in eastern Saskatchewan and in Manitoba, the smaller, paler form GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 71 occurring in southern (aspen-willow association) localities, the larger, darker form in the north (aspen-spruce association). Both forms contain long-winged and short-winged individuals, often together in one population; the short-winged type usually predominates but occasionally (as in the Cypress Hills in 1952) the long-winged type appears more numerous. DescrirTivE Notes: A small to medium-sized, fully winged member of the mexicanus group; closely related to borealis stupefactus, from which it differs primarily in wing length, and to borealis palaceus, from which it differs mainly in the less strongly upturned male sub- genital plate. Males with tegmina usually varying from slightly short of the apex of the abdomen to slightly beyond the abdomen, occasionally a little short of reaching supra-anal plate or at the other extreme with as much as one-fourth of the tegmen reaching beyond the abdomen. Females with tegmina varying from a condition in which about two-thirds of the abdomen is covered to one in which the tegmina extend beyond the abdomen by nearly one-fourth of their length. Posterior third of male abdomen occasionally strongly re- curved dorsally, especially in specimens from northern Rocky Moun- tains, but usually abdomen is horizontal or only moderately recurved. VariaTion: The size of 12 representative males measured (in millimeters) varies in pronotal length from 3.7 to 4.7 (av. 4.2), in length of hind femur from 9.7 to 12.2 (av. 10.8), and in length of teg- men from 8.4 to 16.4 (av. 12.6). Eight females vary in pronotal length from 4.1 to 5.5 (av. 4.8), in length of hind femur from 10.2 to 12.7 (av. 11.4), and in length of tegmen from 11.0 to 16.6 (av. 13.0). The largest specimens are from the northwest, particularly the North- west Territories and Alaska. Mate GENITALIA: Cercus (fig. 7, 7) variable, usually about as in figure 7,j-1; supra-anal plate with lateral elevations strongly raised; furculae usually strongly tapered, separation evident to base, and scarcely reaching middle of supra-anal plate (fig. 9,c-1), sometimes variable (fig. 9,c-2, c-3); subgenital plate in lateral view with dorsal margin varying from essentially straight or slightly upturned apically (fig. 16,d-1) to moderately upturned, in posterior view with margin usually entire, rarely with an indication of twin apices (fig. 11,c-1); posterior surface of subgenital plate rather evenly rounded, without development of the rectangular-shaped disk usually characteristic of borealis palaceus, as in fig. 11,d-5. Aedeagus with main stem relatively short; dorsal valve moderately sclerotized but not parchment-like as in bruneri, in dorsal view lacking the triangular projection shown for bruneri (fig. 3,k,1); accessory lobe relatively large and frequently directed somewhat laterally; epiphallus as drawn (fig. 8,/). 72 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 FEMALE GENITALIA: Cercus (fig. 10,/) averaging more slender, the dorsal ‘‘scoop” of the dorsal ovipositor valve less excavate than in bruneri, but females of the two species not always separable. Coxtoration: General coloration about as in bilituratus; hind femur usually unbanded except dorsally on mesal side where three dark transverse bands usually occur, external bands sometimes present, as in specimens from Hudson Bay area which have the pale areas along the dorsal surface of the hind femur noticeably yellowish in fresh specimens; ventral surface of hind femur and lateral surface ventrad of paginal area usually reddish except in specimens from the Plains States eastward and in southern Ontario and Quebec, reddish area of femur normally correlated with red hind tibia. Males of borealis borealis from the Big Horn Mountains, Wyo., and Fremont Co., Idaho, show a trend toward borealis palaceus, and they suggest intergradation although they are not fully intermediate. Males from Smithers, British Columbia, show a noticeable develop- ment of the dorsal lip at the apex of the subgenital plate. DistrispuTion: The principal recorded distribution of M. borealis borealis, additional to what is shown on our maps (figs. 17, 18), is that noted by Morse (1920) for Maine, and Hebard’s statement (1931, p. 184) that borealis junius is known from Mountain Grove in the Ozark Mountains of south-central Missouri. J. W.H. Rehn (1939) recorded borealis from Grande Miquelon and St. Pierre, near Newfoundland. Male specimens of Melanoplus borealis borealis have been examined from the localities shown in figures 17 and 18. BioLOGY AND ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE: This subspecies is significant as a rangeland pest, and occasionally it attacks crops, but it is not of major importance. Information from the Bozeman, Mont., lab- oratory of the Entomology Research Division, U. S. Department of Agriculture, indicates that this is one of the important grasshoppers in the Targhee National Forest, Fremont Co., Idaho, and the Bridger National Forest, Wyo. It is reported to have been the dominant grasshopper in 1952 in the northern Cariboo and the Prince George Districts of British Columbia (Canad. Insect Pest Rev., vol. 30, p. 307, 1952; Neilson, 1953), as well as injuring alfalfa, grain, and vegetable gardens in northern Saskatchewan (Canad. Insect Pest Reyv., vol. 30, p. 150, 1952). Buckell (1921) characterized borealis in the Chilcotin District of British Columbia as an humicolous hygrophile, an ‘inhabitant of the tall rank vegetation beneath birch and willow on the borders of streams.” He found it a sluggish, richly colored insect. ‘Tolerance for a variety of habitats is shown by W. J. Brown’s experience (in litt., Mar. 1, 1949) of collecting it at Churchill, Manitoba, in areas supporting trees, though at Reindeer Depot he collected it on gently GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 73 Ficure 17.—Distribution of male specimans of Melanoplus borealis borealis examined from Alaska and Canada. rolling, treeless, Arctic tundra that consisted of damp, cold sphagnum which thawed only from 11 to 19 inches during summer. Plants present there included Labrador tea, blueberry, grasses, sedges, and others. Readers interested in the limits of the true Arctic Zone are referred to Kimble and Good (1955) and Munroe (1956). Caudell (1900) suspected borealis of being localized in Alaska, after the collector of the specimens he reported, T. Kincaid, found it in a sphagnum swamp at Kukak Bay, but nowhere else in the surround- ing countryside. The only habitat notes from Labrador which have been seen are those of Scudder (1897b, p. 272), who reported that a collector described finding borealis abundant in luxuriant plants beside a mountain brook. In the United States and southern Canada borealis has been found most often in cool, damp situations, as discussed by Blatchley (1920) and Morse (1920), but, while it appears to enjoy bogs and areas of sedges and other plants found in mountain meadows, it also occurs in moist open pastures and mowed fields in New England (Gurney 1935). Cantrall (1943) considered it a characteristic inhabitant of “the leatherleaf stratum of the bog habitat” in southern Michigan. In the prairie provinces of Canada the subspecies inhabits tall rank vegetation on the borders of streams and ponds within a forested area. Similar situations in the open grasslands are not occupied. The distribution is therefore local in grassland areas. The biology of borealis borealis has not been studied fully. Nymphs are described by Handford (1946). It has been suggested that in ee eEeE—Eee ee EO OeeEEeEeEeEeEeeeeeeeeEeeae—eaeamam=e—e—EEOEEOOOO ew EEE “SOTFITEIOT $930IS peyuy) WOl} poullulexo §1]D03404 snjqdounjayy jo suowtoods oyew fo uolNnnqiysiq— sg] aan yy VOL, 110 Se}Oipawajur sisuayojn—snaodojo0d SayDIpsw4ajul snadojod—sijpas0q Saj;DIpawisjul snaao0jpd—snyoDjyadnjs—sijon9a10q sisuayojn sijdas0q “W snedojod sijpai0q “Ww SNyODjJadnjs sijDes0q “Ww $1]09J0q $}|D970q “W PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM 74 GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS Vi) parts of British Columbia two years are required for a complete life cycle (Canad. Insect Pest Rev., vol. 34, p. 273, 1956). Seasonally, it has been considered an early form by Morse (1920) and Cantrall (1943). The following are extreme dates on the labels of specimens examined: Warren Woods, 8S. Dak., May 28; Cummington, Mass., June 12—Aug. 16; Mt. Greylock, Mass., July 3, Aug. 17; Bloomington, Ind., June 16; Sawmill Bay, Northwest Territories, July 14; Chilkat Pass, British Columbia, July 13; Reindeer Depot, Northwest Terri- tories, Aug. 3, Aug. 16; Fairbanks, Alaska, July 4, Sept. 2; Nain, Labrador, Aug. 4; Hopedale, Labrador, Sept. 6; Big Horn Mts., Wyo., Aug. 15. Morse (1921) reported collections in Maine from June 6 to Aug. 25, and Alexander (1951, p. 109) reported that both nymphs and adults (as M. b. monticola) were taken in August from several high Colorado peaks. This subspecies is known from many mountainous areas in the southern part of its range, but it is not confined to high altitudes. Localities near sea level in Labrador, in the bogs at Mer Bleue,® Ontario, at about 1,400 feet in Cummington, Mass., and at various localities in Michigan, Minnesota, and Iowa show that fact. The following are some of the altitudes, shown on labels, at which it has been collected: Chilkat Pass, British Columbia, 3,500 ft.; Yoho Val- ley, British Columbia, 5,000 ft.; Yellowstone National Park, 6,800 ft.; Pikes Peak, Colo., 12,000 ft. Melanoplus borealis stupefactus (Scudder) Ficures 8,d,h; 9,d; 10,d,m; 11,6; 16,c; 18; Puate 5,5,F. Pezotettiz stupefactus Scudder, Rep. Surv. W. of 100th Mer., App. JJ, p. 283, 1876 (1 male, 3 females, nymphs, Taos Peak, Sangre de Cristo Mountains, N. Mex.). Lectotype designated by Hebard (1929, p. 387): Male (USNM). Melanoplus cockerelli Scudder, Psyche, vol. 9, pp. 124-125, 1900 (1 male, 1 female, summit of range between Pecos and Sapello Rivers, N. Mex., near head- waters of Pecos). Lectotype designated by Hebard (1929, p, 388): Male labeled ‘‘Top of range betw. Sapello and Pecos Rivers. Alt. 11,000 ft. Aug.” (MCZ). Melanoplus sapellanus Scudder, Psyche, vol. 9, p. 125, 1900 (1 male, 3 females, same locality as cockerelli). Lectotype designated by Hebard (1929, p. 388): Male (MCZ). Melanoplus latifercula Caudell, Proc. U. 8S. Nat. Mus., vol. 26, pp. 803-804, pl. 55, fig. 4, 4a, 1903 (1 male, Cumbres, Colo.) (USNM). Hebard (1929) indicated the synonymy here shown, which is sup- ported by our study of the four types. Scudder (1897b) placed stupefactus in the genus Podisma, and then when he described cocker- ell1 he failed to recognize stwpefactus and considered it a relative of § A large area containing many sphagnum bogs, near the southeastern city limits of Ottawa. F. A. Urquhart and E. G. Munroe have informed us that Carlsbad Springs is near the eastern extremity of the bog area, and that Hawthorne is at the northwest corner. Auer (1930, fig. 1) shows Mer Bleue as some 10 to 15 miles east of Ottawa. 76 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Melanoplus dawsoni (Scudder). His sapellanus, with data identical to those of cockerelli, was based largely on a male with imperfectly developed genitalia. Descriptive Notes: A short-winged, flightless subspecies averaging smaller than borealis borealis and with the furculae usually wider than in the latter. 'Tegmina broadly lanceolate, usually overlapping nar- rowly but sometimes not quite attingent, covering from scarcely more than one-third to slightly more than one-half of abdomen (about 1% to 1% times length of pronotum); wings vestigial. Posterior third of abdomen moderately to considerably recurved dorsally. MALE GENITALIA: Cercus (fig. 8,d) proportionately broader than in the other subspecies (distorted by drying in lectotype of stupefactus, fig. 8,d-1); furculae usually as in figure 9,d-2, seldom a little more tapering, and sometimes broader (fig. 9,d-1) ; subgenital plate in lateral view with posterior portion of dorsal margin upturned as a lip about to the extent in figure 16,c, not sinuate, posterior margin sometimes more nearly vertical and less oblique than in the figured specimen, in posterior view the dorsal margin variable (fig. 11,0) but usually with at least weakly indicated twin apices. Aedeagus as in borealis borealis; epiphallus with rather deep emargination of anterior margin between ancorae, lophi lanceolate in dorsal view, rather highly elevated and with profile of posterior portions evenly rounded in lateral view (fig. 10,d). FEMALE GENITALIA: About as in borealis borealis, the cercus averag- ing more robust (fig. 10,m). Cororation: Typically dark for the species; hind tibia and ventral surface of hind femur, reaching slightly onto external paginal area, dark red; dark transverse bands of hind femur visible dorsally, variable on external surface. VARIATION: The size of eight representative males, measured in millimeters, varies in pronotal length from 3.6 to 4.5 (av. 4.0), in length of hind femur from 9.0 to 10.8 (ay. 9.7), and in length of tegmen from 4.7 to 7.0 (av. 5.9). Three measured females vary in pronotal length from 4.4 to 4.7 (av. 4.5), in length of hind femur from 11.2 to 11.3 (av. 11.3), and in length of tegmen from 6.5 to 7.4 (av. 6.9). Hebard (1929, p. 389) reported 29 males, 27 females, and 2 nymphs from Tomboy, Colo., also a nymph from Trout Lake, San Miguel Co., Colo., which he regarded as intermediate between borealis monticola and borealis stupefactus. Specimens from the Tomboy series and a male from White River Forest, Colo., have the tegmina covering about three-fourths of the abdomen, the furculae averaging narrower than in typical borealis stupefactus, the dorsal lip of the apex of the male subgenital plate higher and without twin apices developed. These specimens average larger than borealis stupefactus, and have an average GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS V7 tegminal length of 9.5 mm. in males, 10.8 mm. in females. We regard them as intermediate between b. borealis, 6. stupefactus, and 6. palaceus. Disrrisution: Hebard’s record from Gothic, Colo. (1929), is a northern extension of the distribution (fig. 18) based on specimens examined. Specimens of Melanoplus borealis stupefactus have been examined from the following localities: Cotorapo: Mineral Co.; Silverton, San Juan Co.; Lizard Head; peak north of Cumbres, Cumbres Range, Conejos Co.; Los Pinos, Conejos Co.; Cumbres. New Mexico: Taos Peak; Truchas Peak; Beulah; top of range between Sapello and Pecos Rivers; Santa Fe Baldy; head of Nambe Creek, Sangre de Cristo Range. The following material is intermediate between Melanoplus borealis stupefactus, M. b. borealis, and M. b. palaceus: Cotorapvo: Tomboy, Marshall Basin, San Juan Range (about 2 to 3 miles north- east of Telluride; A. B. G.), 11,400 ft., Sept. 2, 1921, Rehn and Hebard (12 0’, 15 9); White River Forest, Aug. 1933 (1 0”). The male from Trout Lake, San Miguel Co., Colo., collected by Hebard Sept. 4, 1921, at 9,700 feet, and reported by him (1929, p. 389) as intermediate between borealis monticola and 6b. stupefactus has tegmina covering slightly more than one-half of the abdomen. We regard it as 0. stupefactus. BroLoGy AND ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE: Most of the known biological data on this grasshopper have been summarized by Hebard (1929, pp. 388-389; 1935a, p. 67). It is of no recognized economic importance, and there have been no detailed studies of its bionomics. Distribu- tion is mainly if not entirely in the Arctic Alpine and Hudsonian zones in northern New Mexico and southwestern Colorado. The lowest altitude at which it has been recorded is 8,500 feet at the head of Chupidero Creek, N. Mex., and the highest 12,629 feet at the summit of Santa Fe Baldy, N. Mex. Small numbers of specimens have been recorded well above timber line, there occurring in patches of green vegetation, but it has been found abundant on mountain slopes and in mountain meadows of lush grasses and other plants such as marsh marigold (Caltha lepto- sepala Hooker). At each of two localities (Los Pinos, Colo.; head of Chupidero Creek, Sangre de Cristo Range, N. Mex.), Hebard reported more than 50 adult specimens take by himself and Rehn, while on Neff Mountain, Cumbres Range, Colo., he reported their collecting more than 100 adults. Collection dates range from July 24 to Sep- tember 11, and nymphs have been observed throughout July and August. Hebard found about two-thirds of the specimens at the summit of Santa Fe Baldy still immature on August 1. Many nymphs of the intermediate population at Tomboy, Colo., were taken on Sept. 2, 1921, by Rehn and Hebard. 78 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Melanoplus borealis palaceus Fulton Frcurss 8,a; 10,t; 11,d; 16,e; 18; PuatE 4,p. Melanoplus borealis palaceus Fulton, Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer., vol. 23, pp. 619-620, fig. 1,r-u, 1930 (5 males, 8 females, Upper Klamath Marsh, Oreg.). The holotype male and allotype female were designated by Fulton (USNM). Descriptive NoTEs: A usually fully winged subspecies, averaging slightly larger than borealis borealis, moderately larger than 6. stupefactus, and slightly smaller than 6. utahensis. Characterized especially in the male by the strongly upturned and recurved apical third of the abdomen, and by the subgenital plate which apically is considerably produced dorsally though only moderately produced posteriorly. Male tegmina usually reaching about to apex of abdomen and apices of hind femora, sometimes a little shorter; female tegmina averaging a little shorter, rarely slightly exceeding hind femora. Mate GENITALIA: Cercus usually as in figure 8,a-2, somewhat variable (fig. 8,a-3,4), and in holotype (fig. 8,a-1) its lateroposterior margin rather irregular; supra-anal plate and furculae of holotype and of most specimens much as in figure 9,d, in a few specimens the furculae somewhat shorter and less widely separated at their apices; subgenital plate in lateral view (fig. 16,¢) somewhat variable, the apical portion of dorsal margin much elevated, in posterior view the dorsal margin (fig. 11,d) usually entire, sometimes with traces of emargination, rarely with a median depression creating twin knobs, the posterior surface of subgenital plate usually with a roughly rec- tangular vertical area which is sometimes weakly excavate (x of fig. 11,d-5); one paratype (Univ. Michigan) with subgenital plate less elevated and with rectangular area of posterior surface less well defined than in holotype. Aedeagus essentially as in borealis borealis; epiphallus in dorsal view usually about as in figure 8,f, in holotype the apices of lophi somewhat more lanceolate, in lateral view lophus usually noticeably flattened at top near apex, much as in figure 10,e. FEMALE GENITALIA: About as in borealis borealis; cercus of allotype essentially like figure 10,/, in some specimens slightly more acute; dorsal ovipositor valve with “scoop” of allotype (fig. 10,t) and several other specimens more deeply excavate than usual in b. borealis, but in other females not clearly different, margins of ‘‘scoop” slightly irregu- lar, seldom with a deep notch as in allotype. VaRIATION: The size of seven representative males, measured in millimeters, varies in pronotal length from 4.2 to 4.8 (av. 4.5), in length of hind femur from 10.8 to 11.7 (av. 11.2), and in length of tegmen from 11.0 to 14.5 (av. 12.6). Seven measured females vary in pronotal length from 4.9 to 5.9 (av. 5.3), in length of hind femur GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 79 from 12.3 to 14.8 (av. 13.4), and in length of tegmen from 11.7 to 15.3 (av. 14.3). Cotoration: Averaging rather dark for group; hind femur usually with transverse bands evident only dorsally, ventral surface, part of mesal surface and external surface ventrad of paginae usually reddish, rarely yellowish; hind tibia reddish. Specimens intermediate between borealis palaceus and 6. utahensis are discussed under the latter. Three males and one female from Teton Co., Wyo., 5 males from Togwatee Pass (about 30 mi. east of Jackson Hole), Wyo., and 2 males from Yellowstone National Park, Wyo. (south side of Mt. Washburn, 8,600 ft.; Camp Cowan, Fireside River, 7,100 ft.), are considered intermediate between b. palaceus and b. borealis because of the shape of the male subgenital plate. Males typical of b. borealis also have been seen from Yellowstone National Park, and it is evident that the latter is a tension area. Males from southern Utah are not fully typical of 6. palaceus, and they seem to vary toward 6. borealis. Three males from Hackamore, Calif., also are atypical. The apex of the subgenital plate of those males is dorsally produced less than in typical palaceus, and there is scarcely any development of a rectangular area on the posterior surface of the subgenital plate. The number of localities from which 6. palaceus is known are too few and too scattered to permit a complete under- standing of the relationships of this subspecies. DisrrisutTion: Male specimens of Melanoplus borealis palaceus have been examined from the following localities: Montana: Lakeview area. Wromine: Cokeville. Uran: La Sal Mts., Grand Co.; Puffer Lake, Tushar Mts.; East Fork of Merchant Valley, Tushar Mts.; Beaver; Cedar Breaks. Wasuineton: Bonaparte Lake, Okanogan Co. OrEecon: Upper Klamath Marsh; Bly; Bulls Prairie, Warner Mts. CauirorniA: Hackamore, Modoe Co. BIOLOGY AND ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE: The types of M. borealis palaceus were “found near the pine woods on the border of a large meadow land known as Upper Klamath Marsh, situated on the plateau” east of Crater Lake, Oreg. (Fulton, 1930). A male and female from Bly, in Klamath Co., Oreg., about 50 miles southeast of the type locality, are labeled “Swp. mdw.,’”’ presumed to mean swampy meadow. ‘There is little information about altitudinal preferences of this grasshopper beyond the general upland character of all the areas where collections have occurred. In the La Sal Mountains, the most easterly locality where palaceus has been taken, various habitats are available, as discussed by Tanner and Hayward (1934). At Upper Klamath Marsh, Oreg., adults have been taken on June 23 and August 80 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 11, and in the Lakeview area, Mont., from July 4 to August 24. The Bonaparte Lake, Wash., record is based on a male taken on July 14 at an altitude of 4,000 feet. Three males and one female from Hackamore, Calif., were taken July 17. The Hackamore area is characterized by swampy places in which wildlife refuges have been established, but there is no record of the habitat from which the specimens were taken. Specimens taken by Rehn and Hebard in the Tushar Mountains, Utah, were at altitudes varying from 8,200 to 9,000 feet, while on the Markagunt Plateau at Cedar Breaks, Utah, captures occurred at 10,400 feet. Dates of these Utah captures by Rehn and Hebard ranged from August 20 to August 31. Because of the scanty information about the environment in most of the localities where palaceus has been collected, a brief description of the Lakeview area, Mont., is appropriate. For these notes we are indebted primarily to Frank T. Cowan, who loaned an unpublished manuscript prepared by the late H. M. Jennison, when, as a member of a research team under the direction of J. R. Parker in the early 1930’s, he studied the vegetation of the Centennial Valley. Lakeview is a small village in the Centennial Valley, in extreme southeastern Beaverhead County. This high mountain valley is 40 to 45 miles long and 3 to 8 miles wide, and is bounded on the south by the Centennial Mountains. The lowest level of the valley floor, through which the Red Rock River flows westward, is about 6,400 feet, and Red Rock Pass, at the east end of the valley, is about 7,000 feet. In the spring, run-off from melting snow in the mountains provides many wet areas in the meadows of wild hay, and it also supports several shallow lakes. Specimens of palaceus are noted in the Bozeman laboratory records as having been taken in two environments, one dominated by wiregrass and the other by bluegrass. Wiregrass (Juncus balticus) is dominant in extensive swales, or areas of low marshy ground. In an average year the swales are wet with slowly moving water until July, and some arms remain wet until late July or early August. The bluegrass areas include two or more species of Poa, as well as species of Hordeum and Puccinella. Greasewood (Scarcobatus) also occurs. These bluegrass areas are much drier than the wiregrass swales, but often are adjacent to the latter or appear as islands in their midst. They are green and succulent in spring and early summer, but by mid-July the grasses usually have matured and are light straw-colored or almost white. Both these environments are considered steps in the development of the grassland climax, as con- trasted with the sagebrush climax in other parts of the valley. GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS Sl Melanoplus borealis utahensis Scudder, new combination FicureEs 8,b,g; 9,e; 10,e; 11,e; 16,f; 18; PLatE 4,8 Melanoplus utahensis Scudder, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. 36 (154), pp. 19, 32’ 1897; Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, pp. 132, 167-168, pl. 11, fig. 10, 1897 (1 male, Salt Lake Valley, Utah). The unique male type, cited by Rehn and Hebard (1912, p. 79), is labeled ‘S. L. Val. Utah 8-30’; “L. Bruner Collector’; “Drawn”; “Mel. utahensis Scudder’s Type, 1895.” Also, the specimen bears a Bruner manuscript label and more recently attached type labels and comments on type locality (USNM). Neither precise type locality nor the year of the type’s capture is definitely known. When Hebard examined the type, probably in the late 1920’s, he attached a label reading “From a western canyon of the Wasatch Mts., back from Ogden.”” A male and female from a series of four specimens from Ogden in the Philadelphia (ANSP) collection were labeled by Hebard as topotypes. Each of these bears a printed label “Ogden, Utah,” and one male is labeled “‘Melanoplus utahensis Bruner, Type spec.,”’ apparently in Bruner’s handwriting. The pair labeled as topotypes by Hebard bear the further notation “Taken w. type,” added by Hebard. Neither in Scudder’s revision nor elsewhere have we found any information relating to these four specimens. It may be that Bruner did not send them to Scudder for inclusion in the revision and that, although Bruner gave them a manuscript name, they were not studied again until his North American collection be- came available to Hebard. Scudder referred to the Bruner manuscript name when wtahensis was described, and the unique type has a Bruner name label like the one on the Ogden male. These labels may have led Hebard to assume that the whole series was taken together. Unless more information supporting Hebard’s opinion becomes available, it seems logical to conclude from the itinerary discussed by Bruner (1890) that the type was collected near Salt Lake City in 1890, and that the Ogden specimens are not topotypes. In a report to C. V. Riley dated Sept. 1, 1890, Bruner described a trip made in August, primarily to Idaho. Near the end of the trip he went to Ogden and Salt Lake City, ‘‘at both of which points collections were made.’’ Thence, he went directly home to Lincoln, Nebr.; by train. Because of the date on the specimen, August 30, it is probable that the specimen was collected during Bruner’s last day in the field. Since Big Cottonwood Canyon, where utahensis has been collected, is within a few miles of Salt Lake City, that or a nearby area may well have been the locality which Bruner visited. The 1890 trip is the only one for which a record apparently satisfying the known data has been found. The fact that the specimen was deposited in 47711959 6 82 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 the Riley collection, as recorded by Scudder, suggests that it was taken while on a Federal assignment such as the one in 1890. M. borealis utahensis, considered by Hebard (1928, p. 281) probably to be a distinct species closely related to M. bruneri, is shown by the aedeagus to belong instead to the borealis line of development. Descriptive Notes: A nearly fully winged subspecies of medium to large size in relation to other subspecies. Characterized especially in the male by the posteriorly prolonged (as well as elevated) subgenital plate. Tegmina failing by about 2 to 3 mm. to reach the tips of hind femora and the end of the abdomen. Posterior third of abdomen strongly upturned. MALE GENITALIA: Cercus typically as in figure 8,b-1-2, sometimes with the apex more obliquely rounded (fig. 8,b-3); furculae broad, in holotype about as in figure 9,e-1, sometimes more tapering; subgenital plate in lateral view extremely prolonged, somewhat variable in shape (fig. 16,f), in posterior view with dorsal margin varying from twice emarginate (fig. 11,e-1-3) to entire. Aedeagus as in borealis borealis; epiphallus (fig. 8,g) with lophi somewhat oblique anteriorly in dorsal view, in lateral view (fig. 10,e) rather flattened anteriorly. FEMALE GENITALIA: Cercus about as in borealis borealis (fig. 10,1); Ovipositor essentially as in b. borealis except that “scoop”’ of dorsal valve averages slightly more excavate, with apex more upturned. CoLoraTIon: Type with narrow yellowish green longitudinal stripes on lateral carinae of pronotum, lower half of lateral lobe of pronotum and lower part of head similar; metepisternal stripe conspicuously yellowish; tegmen brown, unmarked; hind femur with external paginal area light brown, paler toward base, dorsal surface with three distinct dark bars, in addition to dark brown knee, external surface ventrad of paginae pink, mesal surface tinged with pink; hind tibia pink. Specimens from Big Cottonwood Canyon lighter- colored than type, tegmina and dorsum of pronotum light brown, most of remainder of body yellowish brown, hind tibia weak pinkish. Variation: Measurements (in millimeters) of the holotype are: Body, 27.0 (Scudder’s measurement) ; pronotum, 6.1; hind femur, 14.3; and tegmen, 17.0 Specimens from Ogden average larger than those from Big Cottonwood Canyon. Measurements of the Ogden speci- mens are: Males (2), pronotum, 5.3, 5.5 (av. 5.4), hind femur, 12.0, 12.0 (av. 12.0), tegmen, 15.3, 18.8 (av. 17.1); females (2), pronotum, 5.7, 6.0 (av. 5.9), hind femur, 13.7, 14.7 (av. 14.2), tegmen, 12.5, 15.5 (av. 14.0). Measurements of representative Cottonwood Canyon specimens are: Males (3), pronotum, 4.6 to 5.0 (av. 4.8), hind femur, 11.4 to 11.6 (av. 11.5), tegmen, 11.3 to 11.8 (av. 11.5); females (2), pronotum, 5.1, 5.3 (av. 5.2), hind femur, 12.4, 12.5 (av. 12.5), tegmen, 12.3, 12.5 (av. 12.4). GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 83 The series from 3 miles north of Mantua, Utah, which was labeled in the Philadelphia (ANSP) collection by Morgan Hebard as atypical Melanoplus utahensis, is here considered intermediate between borealis utahensis and b. palaceus. External male genitalia are as illustrated (figs. 8,c; 9,6; 11,f; 16,9), and the subgenital plate suggests the inter- mediate relationship of the population. The lophi of the epiphallus are apically lanceolate in dorsal view, well flattened at the top in lateral view. The general color of these specimens is dull yellowish brown; hind tibiae are tinged with pink. The general color suggests that of the Red Banks series of brwnert and may reflect comparable ecological conditions. Measurements (in millimeters) of representative Mantua speci- mens are: Males (5), length of pronotum, 5.9 to 6.4 (av. 6.2), hind femur, 12.4 to 14.2 (av. 13.5), tegmen, 12.5 to 15.5 (av. 14.3); females (2), length of pronotum, 6.5, 7.0 (av. 6.8), hind femur, 14.8, 15.5 (av. 15.2), tezmen, 15.0, 16.0. (av. 15.5); Disrrrsution: This grasshopper appears to be a relatively localized subspecies of the northern Wasatch Mountains, and to be more or less surrounded by M. borealis palaceus rather than being distributed linearly adjacent to M. 6. palaceus. ‘There may be altitudinal differ- ences also, so that material from additional localities is likely to clarify the situation. Full data on all specimens examined are as follows: Salt Lake Valley, Utah, Aug. 30, L. Bruner (10%, holotype) ; Big Cottonwood Canyon, Wasatch Mts., Utah, 7,400 ft., Canadian zone, Aug. 19, 1924, Rehn and Hebard (807, 82); Ogden, Utah (207, 29). Intermediate between Melanoplus borealis utahensis and M. 6. palaceus: 3 miles north of Mantua, Box Elder Co., Utah, Wasatch Mts., 5,800 ft., Aug. 9, 1928, Rehn & Hebard. (1867, 179, 1 juv. ¢&, apparently 5th instar). BIoLOGY AND ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE: We are indebted to Rehn and Hebard for the only notes on the biology of this poorly known grasshopper. In Big Cottonwood Canyon, Utah, on Aug. 18, 1924, they found it in the Canadian zone at 7,400 feet, present ‘in moderate numbers in lush herbage near stream on flat with much aspen and spruce” (Hebard, 1936b, p. 173). Hebard also gave notes on a grasshopper taken at Red Banks in Logan Canyon, and ascribed to utahensis, but, as previously mentioned under M. bruneri, the only specimens we have seen with corresponding data prove to be bruneri. 84 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 References ALEXANDER, GORDON 1941. Keys for the identification of Colorado Orthoptera. Univ. Colorado Studies, ser. p, vol. 1, pp. 129-164, 4 figs. 1951. The occurrence of Orthoptera at high altitudes, with special reference to Colorado Acrididae. Ecology, vol. 32, pp. 104-112. ANDER, KJELL 1949a. De boreoalpina Orthoptera. Ann. Ent. Fenn., vol. 14, suppl., pp. 48-55, 3 figs. 1949b. Die borioalpinen Orthopteren Europas. Opusc. Ent., vol. 14, pp. 89-104, 4 figs. Anprrson, N. L., anp Wricut, J. C. 1952. Grasshopper investigations on Montana range lands. Montana Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 486, pp. 1-46, 6 tables. ANDREWARTHA, H. G., AND Brreuw, L. C. 1954. The distribution and abundance of animals. 782 pp., illus. AUER, VAINO 1930. Peat bogs in southeastern Canada. Canadian Dep. Mines Geol. Surv. Mem. 162, pp. 1-32, 1 map, 3 profile sheets. Batu, E. D.; TinxHam, E. R.; Fuock, Ropert; anp Vorutss, C. T. 1942. The grasshoppers and other Orthoptera of Arizona. Univ. Arizona Tech. Bull. 93, pp. 257-373, 11 figs., 4 pls. Barngs, O. L. 1955. Effect of food plants on the lesser migratory grasshopper. Journ. Econ. Ent., vol. 48, pp. 119-124, 2 figs. Betuunge, C. J. 8. 1875. Grasshoppers or locusts. Ann. Rep. Ent. Soc. Ontario 1874, pp. 29-42. BuatTcHuey, W. S. 1920. Orthoptera of northeastern America. 784 pp., 246 figs. Breer C2 A: 1947. Interrelated effects of food, temperature, and humidity on the development of the lesser migratory grasshopper, Melanoplus mexicanus mexicanus (Saussure). Oklahoma Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. T—26, pp. 1-50, 18 figs. Brooks, A. R. 1958. Acridoidea of southern Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba. Canadian Ent., vol. 90, suppl. 9, pp. 1-92, 128 figs. Bruner, LAwRENCE 1883. Report of observations in the Northwest on the Rocky Mountain locust. In U.S. Dep. Agr., Div. Ent. Bull. 2, pp. 7-22. 1885. Contributions to the north trans-continental survey. Canadian Ent., vol. 17, pp. 9-19. 1886. Report on the abundance of the Rocky Mountain locust in 1885. U.S. Dep. Agr., Rep. Ent., 1885, pp. 303-307. 1890. Report on a local outbreak of grasshoppers in Idaho. Insect Life, vol. 3, pp. 135-141. 1893a. The more destructive locusts of America north of Mexico. U. S. Dep. Agr., Div. Ent. Bull. 28, pp. 1-40, 21 figs. 1893b. Report upon insect injuries in Nebraska during the summer of 1892. U.S. Dep. Agr., Div. Ent. Bull. 30, pp. 34-35. GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 85 1908. Melanoplus. In Godman and Salvin, Biologia Centrali-Americana, Orthoptera, vol. 2, pp. 317-327. BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, C. 1861. Orthopterologische Studien. Verh. Zool. Bot. Gesell., Wien, vol. 11, pp. 221-228. 1900. Orthoptera. Jn Von Ihrer, Konig]. Hoheit der Prinzessin Therese von Bayern auf einer Reise in Sudamerika gesammelte Insekten. Berliner Ent. Zeit., vol. 45, pp. 253-258, 1 pl. Bucke., E. R. 1921. Notes on the ecological distribution of some Orthoptera from the Chilcotin District of British Columbia. Proc. Ent. Soc. British Columbia, syst. ser., no. 18, pp. 32-38. 1922. A list of the Orthoptera and Dermaptera recorded from British Columbia prior to the year 1922, with annotations. Proc. Ent. Soc. British Columbia, syst. ser., no. 20, pp. 9-41. Burks, B. D. 1953. The mayflies, or Ephemeroptera, of Illinois. Bull. Ill. Nat. Hist. Surv., vol. 26, pp. 1-216, 395 figs. CanTRALL, IrvING J. 1943. The ecology of the Orthoptera and Dermaptera of the George Re- serve, Michigan. Univ. Michigan Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool., vol. 54, pp. 1-182, 10 pls. CanTRALL, Irvine J., AND YOUNG, FRANK 1954. Contrasts in the orthopteran faunas of grassland, forest, and transi- tional areas in southern Indiana, Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci., vol. 63, pp. 157-162. CaupeE.., A. N. 1900. Orthoptera. (Papers from the Harriman Alaska Expedition, XV.) Proc. Washington Acad. Sci., vol. 2, pp. 511-512. 1903. Notes on Orthoptera from Colorado, New Mexico, Arizona, and Texas, with descriptions of new species. Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 26, pp. 775-809, 1 pl. 1908. Notes on some western Orthoptera; with the description of one new species. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., vol. 34, pp. 71-81. 1915. Notes on some United States grasshoppers of the family Acrididae. Proc. U. 8. Nat. Mus., vol. 49, pp. 25-31. CockKERELL, T. D. A. 1888. Entomological work in Colorado. Entomologist, vol. 21, pp. 298-305. 1889. On the variation of insects. Entomologist, vol. 22, pp. 125-130. Coaquituert, D. W. 1892. Report on the locust invasion of California in 1891. U.S. Dep. Agr., Div. Ent., Bull. 27, pp. 34-57. Cootey, R. A. 1904a. Notes on a grasshopper outbreak in Montana. U.S. Dep. Agr., Div. Ent. Bull. 46, pp. 41-43. 1940b. First annual report of the State Entomologist of Montana. Montana Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 51, pp. 199-274. 1918. Fifteenth annual report of the State Entomologist of Montana. Montana Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 124, pp. 195-208. 1925. Montana insect pests for 1923 and 1924. Univ. Montana Bull. 170, pp. 1-30. 86 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Corkins, C. L. 1922. Notes on the migration of Melanoplus atlanis Riley in northern North Dakota in 1920. Canadian Ent., vol. 54, pp. 1-4. CRIDDLE, NORMAN 1917. Precipitation in relation to insect prevalence and distribution. Canadian Ent., vol. 49, pp. 77-80. 1918. The egg-laying habits of some of the Acrididae. Canadian Ent., vol. 50, pp. 145-151. 1924. Notes on the early stages of grasshoppers. Canadian Ent., vol. 56, pp. 49-53. Dirsu, V. M. 1953. Morphometrical studies on phases of the desert locust. Anti-Locust Bull. 16, pp. 1-34, 31 figs. 1956. The phallic complex in Acridoidea (Orthoptera) in relation to the taxonomy. ‘Trans. Ent. Soc. London, vol. 108, pp. 223-356, 66 pls. Dopag, G. M. 1876. New species of Acridini from Nebraska. Canadian Ent., vol. 8, pp. 9-12. 1878. Variations in the wing expanse of Pezotettiz. Canadian Ent., vol. 10, pp. 103-105. Drake, C. J., AND TauBsER, O. E. 1946. The history of grasshoppers and locusts in Iowa. Iowa Yearbook Agr., 1945, pp. 177-199, illus. Essie, E. O. 1926. Insects of western North America. 1035 pp., 766 figs. Faure, J. C. 1933. The phases of the Rocky Mountain locust Melanoplus mexicanus (Saussure). Journ. Econ. Ent., vol. 26, pp. 706-718, 1 pl. FIEBER, F. X. 1853. Synopsis der europaischen Orthopteren mit besonderer Rucksicht der Bohmischen Arten. Lotus, vol. 3, pp. 90-104, 115-129, 138-154, 168-176, 184-188, 201-207, 232-238, 252-261. (Separate, pp. 1-78, issued in 1854.) Fox, HENRY 1917. Field notes on Virginia Orthoptera. Proc. U. 8. Nat. Mus., vol. 52, pp. 199-234. FRIAUF, JAMES J. 1953. An ecological study of the Dermaptera and Orthoptera of the Welaka area in northern Florida. Ecol. Monogr., vol. 23, pp. 79-126, 17 figs. Frison, T. H. 1927. A list of the insect types in the collection of the Hlinois State Natural History Survey and the University of Illinois. Bull. Illinois Nat. Hist. Surv., vol. 16, pp. 137-309. FROESCHNER, R. C. 1954. The grasshoppers and other Orthoptera of Iowa. Iowa State Coll. Journ. Sci., vol. 29, pp. 163-354, 9 pls. Futon, B. B. 1930. Notes on Oregon Orthoptera with descriptions of new species and races. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer., vol. 23, pp. 611-641, figs. 1-3. GauMER, Gro. F. 1878. In, Riley, Packard, and Thomas, Ist Ann. Rep. U. 8. Ent. Comm., appendix 5, Pp. 85-88. GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 87 GoLpMAN, Epwarp A. 1951. Biological investigations in Mexico. Smithsonian Misc. Coll., vol. 115, pp. 1-476, pls. 1-70, map. Griscom, LupLow, anp FouagEr, Epiru V. 1948. The birds of Nantucket. 156 pp., illus. GuRNEY, ASHLEY B. 1935. Western Massachusetts Orthoptera, Pt. 1. Preliminary list of the Acrididae. Canadian Ent., vol. 67, pp. 185-188. 1941. Taxonomic and bionomic notes on the grasshopper Melanoplus impudicus Scudder. Amer. Midl. Nat., vol. 26, pp. 558-569, 25 figs. 1953. Grasshopper Glacier of Montana and its relation to long-distance flights of grasshoppers. Ann. Rep. Smithsonian Inst. 1952, pp. 305-325, 8 pls. Hanprorp, R. H. 1946. The identification of nymphs of the genus Melanoplus of Manitoba and adjacent areas. Sci. Agr., vol. 26, pp. 147-180, 1 fig., 12 pls. Harper, Rosert W. 1952. Grasshoppers of economic importance in California. California Dep. Agr. Bull., vol. 41, pp. 153-175, illus. HEBARD, MorGan 1909. Additional notes on the Orthoptera of the Keeweenaw Bay Region of Baraga Co., Mich. Ent. News, vol. 20, pp. 155-158. 1917. Notes on Mexican Melanopli (Orthoptera, Acrididae). Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, vol. 67, pp. 251-275, 5 figs. 1925a. The Orthoptera of South Dakota. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila- delphia, vol. 77, pp. 33-155, 2 figs., 1 map. 1925b. Dermaptera and Orthoptera from the State of Sinaloa, Mexico, Pt. 2. Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc., vol. 51, pp. 265-310, pls. 7, 8. 1927. Fixation of the single types of species of Orthoptera deser bed by Cyrus Thomas. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, vol. 79, pp. 1-11. 1928. The Orthoptera of Montana. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, vol. 80, pp. 211-306, 2 pls. 1929. The Orthoptera of Colorado. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, vol. 81, pp. 303-425, 1 pl. 1930. The Orthoptera of Alberta. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, vol. 82, pp. 377-403. 1931. The Orthoptera of Kansas. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, vol. 83, pp. 119-227, 2 figs., 2 maps. 1932a. New species and records of Mexican Orthoptera. Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc., vol. 58, pp. 201-371, pls. 17-21. 1932b. The Orthoptera of Minnesota. Minnesota Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 85, pp. 1-61. 1934a. Notes on Orthoptera from northwestern Minnesota. Ent. News, vol. 45, pp. 103-106. 1934b. The Dermaptera and Orthoptera of Illinois. Bull. Illinois Nat. Hist. Surv., vol. 20, pp. 125-279, 167 figs. 1935a. Orthoptera of the Upper Rio Grande Valley and the adjacent moun- tains of northern New Mexico. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia; vol. 87, pp. 45-82, 3 figs. 88 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 1935b. Studies in the Orthoptera of Arizona. Pt.2. A list of the Dermaptera and Orthoptera with new records and corrections of the literature subsequent to 1909. Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc., vol. 61, pp. 269-316. 1936a. Notes on North American Orthoptera of the Arctic-Alpine Zone. Ent. News, vol. 47, pp. 13-15. 1936b. New genera and species of Melanopli found within the United States and Canada. Pts. 8, 9. Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc., vol. 62, pp. 167-222, 6 pls. 1936c. Orthoptera of North Dakota. North Dakota Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 284, pp. 1-66, 1 map. 1945. Orthoptera of the Appalachian Mountains in the vicinity of Hot Springs, Virginia. Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc., vol. 71, pp. 77-97. HENRIKSEN, K. L. 1939. A revised index of the insects of Grgnland. Medd. Grgnland, vol. 119, pp. 1-112. HENRIKSEN, K. L., anpD LUNDBECK, W. 1917. Landarthropoder (Insecta et Arachnida). Medd. Grgnland, vol. 22, pp. 481-823. Herrick, GLENN W., AND Haptey, C. H. 1916. The lesser migratory locust. Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 378, pp. 1-45, 17 figs., 6 pls. Hornapay, WriiuraM T. 1889. The extermination of the American bison. Rep. U. S. Nat. Mus. 1886-1887, pp. 369-548, pls. 1-22. Husset., T. H. 1922. Notes on the Orthoptera of North Dakota. Occ. Papers Mus. Zool., Univ. Michigan, vol. 118, pp. 1-56. 1932. Arevision of the Puer Group of the North American genus Melanoplus, with remarks on the taxonomic value of the concealed male geni- talia in the Cyrtacanthacrinae. Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool., Univ. Michigan, vol. 23, pp. 1-64, 1 fig., 4 pls. Iszeiy, F. B. 1937. Seasonal succession, soil relations, numbers, and regional distribution of northeastern Texas acridians. Ecol. Monogr., vol. 7, pp. 317- 344, 6 figs. 1938. The relation of Texas Acrididae to plants and soils. Ecol. Monogr., vol. 8, pp. 551-604, 7 figs. JENNINGS, O. E. 1909. A botanical survey of Presque Isle, Erie County, Pennsylvania. Ann. Carnegie Mus., vol. 5, pp. 289-421, 4 maps, pls. 22-51. Kine, R. L., AND SuirEr, E. H. 1955. The inheritance of red and blue hind tibiae in the lesser migratory grasshopper, Melanoplus mexicanus mexicanus (Saussure). Journ. Hered., vol. 46, pp. 302-304. KNABEN, NILS 1943. Oversikt over Norges Orthoptera. Bergen Mus. Arbok. Nat. Rek, vol. 2, pp. 1-43. Kimsiz, Grorce, H. T., anp Goop, Dorotuy 1955. Geography of the northlands. 534 pp., 47 figs., 75 pls., 1 sep. map. Kirsy, W. F. 1910. A synonymic catalogue of Orthoptera. Vol. 3, 674 pp. GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 89 KozHAntsuHikoy, I. V. 1956. On the peculiarities of the diapause in eggs of acridian Orthoptera. Ent. Obozr. (Rev. d’Ent. de l’URSS), vol. 35, pp. 28-42. La Rivers, Ira 1948. A synopsis of Nevada Orthoptera. Amer. Midl. Nat., vol. 39, pp. 652-720. Less, A. D. 1955. The physiology of diapause in arthropods. Cambridge Monogr. Exp. Biol., vol. 4, pp. 1-151, 25 figs. Lippy, W. F. 1954. Chicago radiocarbon dates, IV. Science, vol. 119, pp. 135-140. MacCartnay, H. R. 1956. ‘ith alan i . bon ; Vikas sti ae ey ist: ZS YY 1 , Pa ae i ; slot i wt } i rs ae) ; FAs is ity (PeMEUL Out ay, ; yi ae y nay a aa 7 bene MY Sack ipaghe Stl ee say e nm | doy a hyo * thaghare nt m. ; A Mi i AY " : Agr ucyethind i 7 a wake [tA int vod) FOU trh ek ANS 9 be ANE che eson, og aieeh sel sea itt ni aN = in + Ms iy .L ty att amt ; ' a ; motion? 9+ ath fe eased ee, he pce Seo carr ret air Hes i ah ee rn r -~ Oe eh et ours, ips ag FN dy 19, Ve dak LCDI Sides MIE Ae Mase net ied oveerteln - ti , fe Aieave" ree | on 7 Ziv lineitimat i eds ney Hero dtl h i es AA CSAS IPA TLE ites AML eRe MO. ca, Von. HMMS 1 ous Vibes PA 1 ike ’ ot bl itt ait itv io. dba if § ri , 1 & e cis . a - - a sik a Wy fue 6 y Jae Dil T yh Say By Se nul # POO i Og ae faenn vi 7 2 = ec ite- ee Or Gea 34 oh oe ex ‘tit ia @ | ny ' AC 7 ae a I ba, _f P oe ; I f i - AO SIL PA, een { a] Ti ey = L ire ae ee Lor UFO act ag : 1 1 ! eee 1 ‘| Oey “ Mi oe au win) i) Got Aa! arr oa hyve 4 « ad . a, Rife sagt BNE ay ee. ee bs SERE ny ried a] é alr C iy ’ wre ; H ray i hii 1 ' Atay oa nih PP te ryekt ; i i—e 7 i { - » y ye a i] 7! } t ‘ } a Plates 1=5 ie a aaa | f PROC. U.S. NAT. MUS. VOL. 110 GURNEY AND BROOKS, PLATE 1 a, Melanoplus mexicanus, male, La Cumbre, Mexico. B, c, .M. bilituratus bilituratus, males: B, from Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada; c, from Claydon, Saskatche- wan, Canada. pb, £, M. bilituratus vulturnus, females: p, from Stony Man Mountain, Shenandoah National Park, Va.; ©. from Independence, Kans. PROC. U.S. NAT. MUS. VOL. 110 GURNEY AND BROOKS, PLATE 2 A-C, Melanoplus bilituratus defectus: a, male from Pendleton’s Ranch, 4 miles south of fumaeacori, Ariz.; 8, male from Tempe, Ariz., reared: c, female from Chandler, Ariz. T1Z.; J pe, b, M. spretus, female from Iowa, 1873. PROC. U.S. NAT. MUS. VOL, 110 GURNEY AND BROOKS, PLATE ,, Melanoplus brunert, male, from Sheridan County, Wyo. 8, ¢, M. devastator: B, male, from Folsom, Calif.; c, female from El Dorado County., Calif. PROC. U.S. NAT. MUS. VOL. 110 GURNEY AND BROOKS, PLATE 4 A, Melanoplus bilituratus defectus, male, from Chandler, Ariz. B, M. borealis utahensis, male, from Ogden, Utah. _c, male, intermediate between M. borealis utahensis and M. borealis palaceus, from 3 miles north of Mantua, Utah. ov, M. borealis palaceus, male, holotype. GURNEY AND BROOKS, PLATE 5 110 PROG? UseSe NAgieMUS VO: ‘OOD “SoIquing, fo You yvod wold} ‘O[PULOF “A ne) e@) “AquNOD) [eLoulpY WLOLf “O] EU “al esnjov fagnys S1]Da40G “J “A “A “OOD “XOQUIO J, Wolf “OTe UL ‘snaov]og ‘a°W pure ‘sngovfadnjs ‘qa °W ‘S1]D940G S$1]D240G ‘JT UIIMI9d IVIPIWIOJUT “I “YpeRUvd “IOpev.qey ‘UIvNy WIOlf “a sUQGOUUvy]Y ‘UIvAaSSIOG, UO “HM SSOLIOPIIO TT, ISOMUYIION odaq Td9pUlOY] WO] “WV iSo[PUl *S17/DA40q S1]D240g snd ouv)a jy a RON nee 7 tf PROCEEDINGS OF THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM Nhe Ge! SS AN Re fig ee ANo, oY ie =z, oR SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION U.S. NATIONAL MUSEUM Vol. 110 Washington : 1959 No. 3417 A REVISION OF AMERICAN BATS OF THE GENERA EUDERMA AND PLECOTUS By Cartes O. Hanp ey, JR. Introduction Confusion and damage to nomenclatural stability are consequences of taxonomic revisions that do not provide adequate explanations or justifications for proposed changes in nomenclature. They are ig- nored, accepted with reservation, or blindly followed by those who have occasion to use them. Confusion of this sort involves a wide- spread American bat, now referred to in literature either as Cory- norhinus or Plecotus. The purpose of this paper is to clarify the status of this bat and its American and Eurasian relatives (particularly Euderma), to assay the evolution of the group, to map geographic distributions, and to bring together the literature on natural history of the group. The genera Euderma and Plecotus are vespertilionid bats with ex- ceptionally large ears. They are known colloquially as mule-eared bats, jack-rabbit bats, or, simply, big-eared bats, or long-eared bats. Some species are referred to as lump-nosed bats. Plecotus, as here understood, includes the American Jdionycteris and Corynorhinus as subgenera. Perhaps the earliest published reference to an American big-eared bat was that of Clayton (1694, p. 124) in his remarks on the “‘beasts of Virginia”: ‘Batts, as I remember at least two sorts; one a large 95 96 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 sort with long Ears, and particularly long stragling hairs. The other much like the English, something larger I think, very common.”’ There is now an extensive American literature on Huderma and Plecotus, but most reports contain little more than records of speci- mens. The only revisionary works have been those of H. Allen (1864, 1894), Miller (1897), and G. Allen (1916). Most of our knowledge of the anatomy and physiology of the group is included in the papers of Larsell and Dow (1935) and Pearson, Koford, and Pearson (1952). The few life history studies are generally superficial; those of Dalquest (1947), Pearson, et al. (1952), and Twente (1955) are notable excep- tions. Much yet remains to be learned about Huderma and the Ameri- can populations of Plecotus. These bats occur in most temperate portions of the Northern Hemisphere. They are generally scarce. In America, Huderma is known by 16 specimens, the subgenus IJdionycteris is known by less than a dozen specimens, all but two of them collected since 1955; and perhaps no other North American bat with such an extensive geo- eraphic range as the subgenus Corynorhinus has been collected so in- frequently. Species of the latter subgenus are known to occur from the Atlantic to the Pacific and from Canada to the Isthmus of Tehuan- tepec in Mexico. This wide geographic range is deceptive, however, for these bats display narrow limits of tolerance in their choice of habitat. Within the bounds of their ranges are large areas in which they apparently do not occur, and others in which they occur only sparingly. There are few areas in which they are common. MATERIALS The scarcity of Euderma and Plecotus in America is evident from the small number of museum specimens listed in the early reviews. H. Allen’s 1864 monograph included only 18 specimens, and his 1894 monograph only 19. For Miller’s 1897 revision, 43 examples were available. G. Allen’s 1916 review was based on a total of 126 speci- mens. The material from which I have drawn my conclusions concerning these bats consists of four dry skins and skulls and a single specimen preserved in alcohol representing Huderma; three specimens of the subgenus Jdionycteris, dry skins and skulls; 25 dry skins and skulls, two skeletons, and 32 specimens preserved in alcohol, representing at least five races of the subgenus Plecotus; and about 800 specimens (see species accounts for type of preservation) representing all the named forms of the subgenus Corynorhinus. In the course of the study I have examined enough specimens to define Huderma and American Plecotus, but have not attempted to assemble all available specimens. Those examined are in the collec- tions of the following: AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 97 American Museum of Natural History (AMNH) Albert Schwartz (private collection) (AS) California Institute of Technology (CIT) Carlsbad Caverns National Park (CC) Charleston (South Carolina) Museum (ChM) Carnegie Museum (CM) Chicago Natural History Museum (CNHM) W. Gene Frum (private collection) (GF) Instituto de Biologia, Universidad Na- cional Auté6noma de México (IB) Illinois Natural History Survey (INHS) University of Kansas Natural History (KU) Louisiana State University Museum of Zoology (LSU) Harvard University Museum of Com- parative Zoology (MCZ) University of California Museum of Vertebrate Zoology (MVZ) Oklahoma A. & M. College (OAM) Museum of Ohio State Museum (OSM) School of Tropical and Preventive Medicine, Loma Linda, Calif. (STPM) Texas A. & M. College (Texas Co- operative Wildlife Collection) (TCWC) Texas State Department of Health, Austin, Tex. (TSDH) Texas Technological College (TT) University of Arkansas Department of Zoology (UAZ) University of Illinois Museum of Nat- ural History (UI) University of Kentucky Zoology De- partment (UK) University of Michigan Museum of Zoology (UMMZ) University of Oklahoma Museum of Zoology (UOMZ) U.S. National Museum (including U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Biological Surveys collection) (USNM) University of Utah Museum of Zool- ogy (UU) I express sincere thanks and appreciation to the owners of private collections and to the museum authorities who kindly loaned speci- mens for my study. To those at the American Museum of Natural History and at the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard Univer- sity, I am particularly grateful. I am indebted to Seth B. Benson, Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, and to Rollin H. Baker and E. Raymond Hall, Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas, for the loan of specimens set aside for their personal study. Special thanks are due to John A. Sealander, Univer- sity of Arkansas, for allowing me to utilize specimens under his care in the description of a new subspecies, and for his kindness in depositing the type specimen in the U.S. National Museum; and to Aurelio Malaga Alba, Pan American Sanitary Bureau, for his cooperation in securing much needed Mexican specimens, one of which has served as the type of a new subspecies. The Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, has generously allowed me to utilize from its files the unpublished field notes of its collectors. The following individuals contributed information and other assist- ance for which I am grateful: R. W. Barbour, F. L. Burnett, W. W. Dalquest, W. G. Frum, A. F. Ganier, Helen Gaylord, B. P. Glass, Woodrow Goodpaster, R. M. Goslin, Iracy O. Handley, R. H. Hand- 98 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 ley, H. B. Hitchcock, Patricia Isham, E. V. Komarek, Barbara Lawrence, R. E. Mumford, Thelma Reid, C. C. Sanborn, William Schaldach, Jr., Albert Schwartz, P. M. Smith, P. W. Smith, Arthur Stupka, Robert Traub, Bernardo Villa R., and F. N. Young. I am thankful to the persons who reviewed the manuscript and offered helpful criticism and advice: A. M. Elliott, C. W. Hibbard, EK. T. Hooper, Remington Kellogg, D. H. Johnson, H. W. Setzer, A. H. Smith, and C. F. Walker. MeETHODS In tables 7-18 cranial and external measurements, in millimeters. are given for Huderma maculatum, Plecotus auritus, Plecotus phyllotis, and for all the races of the subgenus Corynorhinus. Females are significantly larger than males in these bats. Accordingly, measure- ments for the two sexes are tabulated separately. Only adults, as determined by ossification of the finger joints and appearance of the skull, were measured. Measurements of Huderma are from the following sources: Ashcraft (1932, p. 162), Durrant (1952, pp. 59, 66), Nicholson (1950, p. 197), Parker (1952, p. 480), Stager (1957, p. 260), and four specimens measured by me. External measurements of Plecotus, except of the forearm, are those taken by the collectors. JI measured the forearm (greatest length of radius-ulna including carpals) on the preserved specimens. All cranial measurements (fig. 1) were taken with dial calipers and the aid of a binocular microscope in the following manner: Greatest length: Distance, on the diagonal, from the anteriormost border of the premaxilla to the posterior limit of the supraoccipital; incisors are excluded. Zygomatic breadth: Greatest distance between the outer borders of the zygomatic arches. Interorbital breadth: Least diameter of the interorbital constriction of the frontals. Brain case breadth: Distance, measured above the auditory bullae, between the lateral limits of the parietals. Brain case depth: Distance between the dorsal extreme of the skull and the ventral limit of the occipitosphenoid plate; auditory bullae are excluded. One bar of the calipers lies flat on the occipitosphenoid plate; the other is in contact with the top of the brain case. Maxillary tooth row: Distance between the anterior edge of the canine and the posterior border of the third molar. Postpalatal length: Distance from the anterior limit of the mesopterygoid fossa to the ventral lip of the foramen magnum. Palatal breadth: Distance between the lateral extremes of M3. Presence or absence of a secondary cusp in I! was indexed according to the following scale (fig. 2): AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 99 0, Secondary cusp absent; no trace. 1, Secondary cusp incipient, in the form of a shoulder, not separated from primary cusp by a notch. 2, Secondary cusp present, separated from primary cusp by a notch. Frequently, the degree of development of the secondary cusp of I! is not the same on both sides. When absent in one tooth and incipient in the other, it was indexed as 0.5; when absent in one and present in the other, as 1; when incipient in one and present in the other, as 1.5; etc. The degree of development of the secondary cusp in each population was determined by averaging individual indexes. Thus, a population GREATEST LENGTH BRAIN CASE DEPTH — BRAIN CASE BREADTH ZYGOMATIG BREADTH INTERORBITAL BREADTH PALATAL BREADTH POSTPALATAL LENGTH Ficure 1.—Cranial measurements of Euderma and Plecotus. 100 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Vays 6) 1 2 Ficure 2.—Degrees of development of the secondary cusp in the first upper incisor (anterolateral view). with an incisor cusp index of 0 lacks the secondary cusp. An index of 1 indicates some development of the secondary cusp, and so on. Throughout the text, relative proportions are expressed as per- centages of the greatest length of the skull. Color was measured in diffused white fiuorescent light, without direct natural light. Capitalized color terms in the text are from Ridgway (1912). There appears to be no sexual dichromatism or seasonal variation in coloration. If such exists, it is so slight that, except in cases of extremely worn pelage, it can be disregarded in comparisons. The type of preservation of the specimens examined is indicated in the species accounts by the following abbreviations: a, alcoholic; b, bones (skeleton) ; and s, skin and skull. DENTAL NOMENCLATURE The nomenclature of cusps and the numerical designation of teeth, as used in this paper, are outlinediin figure 3. The naming of the individual teeth requires further eculenvGon The complete primitive dentition of adult placental mammals is a set of 44 teeth: 3-3 1-1 4-4 3-3 Lee ee ey The nearest approach to this in bats is a set of 38 teeth, lacking one upper incisor and one upper and one lower premolar in each jaw: 3-3 ae cx a Pe 3, MS Incisors: Which of the incisors it is that is always missing in Chiroptera is a matter of controversy. Most authors have believed without much doubt that the consistently missing incisor is the first. According to Miller (1907, p. 27) this is indicated, as shown by Winge, by the correspondence of the two upper teeth with the two outer of the lower jaw when the maximum set is present, and also, even more strongly, by the general tendency throughout the group for the premaxillaries to become reduced, particularly along the inner edge. This would inevitably result in eliminating that part of the bone in which the first incisor grows. AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 101 PARACONE PROTOCONE (PROTOCONE) (DEUTEROGONE) MESOSTYLE HY POCONE (TRITOCONE) (TETAR TOCONE) PARACONE PROTOCONE ME TACONE HYPOCONE PARASTYLE ————__ m2 MESOSTYLE 1ST GOMMISSURE 2ND GOMMISSURE 3RD COMMISSURE METASTYLE CINGULUM METACONID (TRITOGONID) PROTOCONID PARACONID PROTOGONID METACONID HYPOCONID ENTOCONID Ss \-———- rriconio | cecal Figure 3.—Nomenclature of teeth of Plecotus. Right upper dentition (above) and left lower dentition (below). There are many objections to the belief that the permanently missing incisor is I’, and no really substantial evidence as to which, if either, of the others it may be. However, what evidence there is favors the theory that the missing tooth may be I’. The deciduous dentition does not contribute information on the lost tooth. No more than two upper incisors have been observed in any normal chiropteran deciduous dentition. For the Vespertilionidae, the formula is the same in all of the genera for which it is known: =22- . 2-2 1-1 2-2 di 3-3” de = dp 3-2 102 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 On the basis of an abnormal supernumerary deciduous incisor in Myotis lucifugus, Stegeman (1956, p. 60) postulated that the normally missing tooth may beI?. G. Allen (1916, p. 335) described a specimen of Plecotus townsend (USMN 150273) with three upper permanent incisors. The “extra’’ incisor was the outermost of the three and differed in form from the other two. Allen speculated that this might represent a long lost I. The uniform absence of a tooth throughout a group as large and as varied as the Chiroptera compels the impression that the absence is a characteristic dating from the dawn of development of the group and subsequently shared by all derivatives. It is doubtful that deviations from such a deep-seated characteristic, such as the devia- tions reported by Allen and by Stegeman, can be assumed to represent a reversion to an even more primitive long lost characteristic. An example of a clearly abnormal extra incisor may be seen in a specimen of P. mericanus (KU 29858). In place of the right outer upper incisor there are two closely approximated twin teeth, neither of which resembles the normal outer incisor in the left premaxilla. Investigation of the factors now operating to cause reduction and loss of the remaining incisors in Recent bats may give clues to the incisor missing throughout the order. As noted above, Miller, following Winge, supposed that reduction of the inner portion of the premaxillary bone left the innermost incisor without a place for its root. However, although all bats lack one upper incisor, not all bats have the tooth-bearing portions of the premaxilaries reduced. There- fore, if the same incisor is missing in all bats, then reduction of the premaxillaries can not always account for the loss. Actually, several evolutionary trends may account for crowding and subsequent reduction and loss of incisors. In forms with an extensible tongue, the action of the tongue may be a responsible agent. In others, a narrowing of the rostrum and mandibles, an enlargement of the canines, or a reduction of the tooth-bearing portions of the premaxillaries may be a cause. The result of these processes is always the same. It is not the reduction and loss of the innermost of the two remaining incisors, but a crowding of both toward the canine. A consequence of this crowding is conflict of the outermost incisor with the occluding lower canine. Further alternative consequences are reduction of the lower canine, diminution or obliteration of the outermost upper incisor, anterior or posterior displacement of the outermost incisor, rotation of the outermost incisor to a narrower axis, elevation of the rostrum, or depression of the mandible. All of these conditions may be observed in Recent bats. It is important to note that in all Chiroptera it is invariably the outer of the two remaining incisors that is reduced in AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 103 size and apparently is the first to disappear. It is most reasonable to assume that these same factors may have operated to eliminate the missing incisor. The first to go then, at a very early stage of chiropteran development, was probably I°. This is in agreement with Andersen’s (1908, p. 205) and Thomas’ (1908, p. 348) criticisms of Miller’s conclusions. PREMOLARS: Since the number of premolars in each maxilla and mandible in all known bats is at least one less than the primitive placental number, it is assumed that one has been lost from each jaw. Thomas (1908, p. 347) argued convincingly that the missing tooth is the second. Miller (1907, p. 28), without proof, arbitrarily assumed it to be the first. Evidence at hand possibly supports Miller’s thesis. A specimen of Plecotus townsend (USNM 81647) has four premolars in one mandible; the other ramus is normal. ‘The extra tooth is on the lingual side of the tooth row, adjacent to the normal anterior premolar and forcing that tooth to the labial side of the row. Both teeth touch the canine. The extra tooth is smaller than the normal anterior premolar and rather like P; in size and shape. If it were to be assumed that this extra tooth reflects a primitive condition in which the normal mandible bore four premolars, then it would be necessary, because of its position, to assume that the extra tooth is P. However, the argument refuting similar evidence for the missing incisor can be applied with equal propriety here. Besides lacking, as do all bats, P2 in maxilla and mandible, Huderma and Plecotus also lack another maxillary premolar. In this instance the missing tooth is probably P?. An examination of Myotis in this connection proves instructive. This genus normally lacks only a single premolar, assumed to be the second, in each jaw. In some forms the remaining premolars normally are not even crowded (e.g., MM. lucifugus). However, other forms (e.g., MM. occultus) frequently lack two premolars in each jaw. The tooth that is variable in occurrence is the third premolar. In 15 specimens of M. occultus P* was present in 4, absent in 11; P; was present in 14, absent in 1. P* normally is absent in Plecotus, but occasionally is present (USNM 265387, 297711). In these specimens P* is present in only one maxilla, is similar to P! but is smaller, and is wedged between P! and P* (postero- internal to P!, on the lingual border of the tooth row). The “‘extra”’ tooth in each instance is similar in form and position to P*® of Myotis occultus. ‘These teeth perhaps represent the normal third premolar and not merely abnormal accessory teeth. They thus may be authentic reversions to a primitive condition. In addition, the third mandibular premolar normally is lacking in Euderma. In Plecotus it is present, but is smaller than either P, or Py. In the subgenus Corynorhinus it is commonly squeezed between the 104 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VoL. 110 larger teeth so that its cross-sectional outline is distorted. Frequently it is displaced to the lingual side of the tooth row. DENTAL FORMULAE: Based on the foregoing conclusions, the dental formulae of the bats discussed in this paper may be written as follows: Se Myotis ee S38 Plecotus ae : = 34 Euderma, Barbastella aa *: = oe = 32 Histiotus, Laephotis = - — = =30 Otonycteris, Nyctophilus, Pharotis oa : ae 3 =28 Antrozous Supraspecific Nomenclature and Relationships History OF NOMENCLATURE SUPRAGENERIC NOMENCLATURE: Several genera of the family Vespertilionidae have exceptionally large ears: Plecotus (including Corynorhinus and Idionycteris, now regarded as subgenera), Huderma, Histiotus, Laephotis, Otonycteris, Nyctophilus, Pharotis, and Antrozous. The relationships of these genera have been variously interpreted. Typical of the opinion of his time, Dobson (1875, p. 348) included all known genera in his ‘Group Plecoti’’ which was the equivalent of a subfamily. As late as 1897 Miller (1897, p. 41) employed the name Plecotinae, of subfamily rank, to include the American big-eared vespertilionids Plecotus (subgenus Corynorhinus) and Euderma. For Antrozous he erected a separate subfamily, Antrozoinae. Later Miller (1907, p. 197) abandoned the subfamily Plecotinae and included its genera in the subfamily Vespertilioninae. At the same time he adopted the terminology of Peters (1865) and placed Antrozous in the subfamily Nyctophilinae. The large ears and auditory bullae and strong zygomata—the principal characteristics common to the 10 genera and subgenera listed above—may not indicate kinship. The classification of Tate (1941, p. 590; 1942, p. 225), based on other characters, probably better expresses the natural relationships of these genera and sub- genera: Subfamily Vespertilioninae Group Myotini Genera: Plecotus Corynorhinus Idionycteris Euderma AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 105 Group Pipistrellini Genera: Histiotus Laephotis Group Nycticeini Genus: Otonycteris Subfamily Nyctophilinae Genera: Nyctophilus Pharotis Antrozous Tate (1942, p. 229) supposed the assemblage of big-eared bats of the group Myotini to be simply a specialized derivative of the Myotis stock, presenting an odd combination of primitive and specialized characters, but not being sufficiently differentiated to warrant the erection of a special category. GENERIC NOMENCLATURE: Initially confused with the exclusively South American genus Histiotus (J. Allen, 1891, p. 195), the bat H. maculatum was soon recognized as the representative of a distinct genus, Huderma (H. Allen, 1892, p. 467). Subsequently, the validity of Huderma has not been questioned. The status of the names Idionycteris, Plecotus, and Corynorhinus has been less clear. Jdionycteris has remained so little known since its description by Anthony in 1923 that there has been no speculation on its systematic position beyond Anthony’s supposition that its nearest relative is Plecotus auritus. The nomenclatural history of the Eurasian Plecotus has been one of stability. Subsequent to the recognition of the genus in 1818 by E. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, the big-eared vespertilionines of Europe and temperate Asia have been recognized consistently by the name Plecotus. No such stability characterizes the nomenclatural history of the bats to which the name Corynorhinus has been applied. Rafinesque used Vespertiio for the first named form in 1818. Later authors (Lesson, 1827; LeConte, 1831; Cooper, 1837) discerned a likeness between European and American big-eared bats and used the name Plecotus for both groups. Following this was a brief period of belief that the American big-eared bats and Eurasian barbastelles were related, and the name Synotis was used for both (Wagner, 1855; H. Allen, 1864). H. Allen gave the American big-eared vespertilionines independent generic status for the first time in 1865 with the name Corynorhinus. This position was confirmed by Miller (1897, 1907) and more recently by Tate (1942). In the 75 years following its conception, the name Corynorhinus has been in almost universal usage for the American forms exclusive of Euderma. A major exception was Dobson’s (1878) conclusion that Corynorhinus is a synonym of Plecotus. Beginning with Simpson (1945), there has been a new trend away from the independent use of the name Corynorhinus and 106 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VoL. 110 a tendency to synonymize it under the name Plecotus. However, there seems to have been no study of specimens to support the con- tention that Corynorhinus and Plecotus are congeneric, or to determine the relation of Idionycteris to them. CLASSIFICATION OF Bic-EARED Bats While agreeing with the basic outline of Tate’s (1942, p. 225) classification of vespertilionid big-eared bats, I prefer a slightly modified version: Subfamily Vespertilioninae Group Myotini Genera: Euderma Plecotus Subgenera: Jdionycteris Plecotus Corynorhinus Group Pipistrellini Genera: Histiotus Laephotis Group Nycticeini Genus: Otonycteris In my opinion, the degree of difference between the nominal genera Idionycteris, Plecotus, and Corynorhinus is of subgeneric or specific rather than generic grade. Jdionycteris is a basal or relict form, whereas Plecotus and Corynorhinus represent more advanced or later evolutionary stages. Corynorhinus has evidently differentiated more rapidly than Plecotus, and has approached the point of generic dis- tinction from its near relatives. Inasmuch as these forms represent different stages of evolution and since they form a disjunct series, at least one of the steps of which contains more than one species, it seems best to regard the degree of difference between the three forms of as subgeneric rather than specific magnitude. Evidence in support of this thesis is presented in the following pages. CHARACTERS AND COMPARISONS Cranial characters relating Huderma and Plecotus and distinguishing them from other big-eared bats (Histiotus, Laephotis, Otonycteris, Nyctophilus, Pharotis, and Antrozous) of the family Vespertilionidae are: Rostrum relatively weak, narrow, and shallow. Brain case elongated and vaulted in the frontal region. Zygomata parallel (in dorsal view) and not bowed out posteriorly. . Dentition weak (teeth not robust). . Cusps of teeth high and sharp-pointed. . P, not so high as Mj. . Teeth reduced in number only slightly from the chiropteran maximum, NOT RWN HE AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 107 The bats of the genera Huderma and Plecotus form a close-knit unit, morphologically and, apparently, phyletically. Huderma and Plecotus appear to be more closely related to one another than either is to any other vespertilionid genus, yet the differences separating them are clearly of generic grade (table 1). The nearest relative of Huderma and Plecotus appears to be Barba- stella (p. 118). Also closely related are Myotis and Pvrpristrellus and their closest allies. Similarities most striking are the lack of -BARBASTELLA BARBASTELLUS USNM 142583 SWITZERLAND 4213Q ARIZONA PLEGOTUS (IDIONYGTERIS) PHYLLOTIS AMNH 62260 TAMAULIPAS Gaol FX KE PLEGOTUS (PLEGOTUS) AURITUS MGZ 36987 GERMANY PLECOTUS (CORYNORHINUS) TOWNSENDIL MGZ 40876 WASHINGTON Ficure 4.—Skulls of Barbastella, Euderma, and Plecotus (Barbastella about 4 times natural size, others about 3 times natural size). ‘Traced from photographs, 108 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL, 110 shortening of the rostrum and lack of dental specialization (loss of teeth and cusps). In these features the resemblance of Huderma and Plecotus to Myotis is greater, to Pipistrellus less. This relation is further substantiated in the postcranial skeleton, where Huderma and Plecotus have some characters of Myotis (species compared: lucifugus, thysanodes, yumanensis), and some of Pipistrellus (species compared: javanicus, subflavus), but in most features they are more like Myotis. On the basis of dental, osteological, and external features, it appears that Huderma and Plecotus should stand between Myotis and Pipi- strellus in the classification of Chiroptera. Genus Euperma: Huderma maculatum is more specialized than any species of Plecotus. It has carried auditory modification—the most spectacular character of the two genera—to the greatest extreme, and in dental characters it is unique. By elongation, in addition to enlargement, of the auditory bulla it has departed from the usual vespertilionid pattern. Externally too, Huderma has exceeded Plecotus and, indeed, all other vespertilionids in auditory specialization—in extreme enlargement of the auricle, in the simplification of the tragus by elimination of the posterior basal lobe, and in the attachment of the tragus to the posterior basal lobe of the auricle as well as to the anterior basal lobe so that the auricle forms a more perfect funnel to the auditory meatus. Hall (1934) pointed out important differences between the body skeletons of Euderma and Plecotus. Notable are the unusual length and shape of the presternum and the shape and angle of the acromion process of the scapula in Huderma. The anterior portions of the tooth rows show great specialization in Huderma. In the upper jaw I’ and P! are reduced; in the lower the canine is reduced (though provided with a prominent accessory cusp), P; has been eliminated, and P, is single-rooted. The posterior portions of the tooth rows, on the other hand, are morphologically primitive in character: There is a trace of a hypocone cusp on M! and on M?, the metacone of M? is well developed, and P, has a metaconid cusp. With the exception of the elongated brain case and bifid median postpalatal prominence, other features of the cranium are primitive as far as the genera Huderma and Plecotus are concerned: The rostrum is weak, the supraorbital region is sharply ridged, the temporal ridges do not coalesce, and the zygomata are strong and are provided medially with a large postorbital expansion. The nostrils are unspecialized, retaining the primitive basic vesper- tilionid shape, as seen in Myotis and Prpistrellus. The evolutionary significance of the bold black and white color pattern of the fur is not known. Such a pattern crops up sporadically in the orders of the class Mammalia, but is notably rare in Chiroptera. AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 109 Among the vespertilionids it is seen only in Huderma maculatum and in the rare African Glauconycteris superba (Hayman, 1939, 1946), which resembles Huderma maculatum in being black and white but has a more elaborate pattern. Hayman even suggested a similarity of the pattern of Glauconycterts superba to that of the spotted skunk, Spilogale. Some other species of Glauconycteris have a similar pattern but with subdued brown and buff tones rather than black and white. Scoto- manes ornatus of southeastern Asia has a pattern of white spots and stripes on the pelage, but the ground color is bright reddish rather than black. In some other forms, Kerivoula picta and Myotis formosus for example, the flight membranes, rather than the fur, are patterned with contrasting colors (Wroughton, 1912, p. 1195, pl. a). Despite numerous evidences of specialization, Huderma retains many primitive traits. It appears to occupy an evolutionary position below the more abundant and more progressive, although less special- ized, Plecotus, with which it shares its geographic range. An early derivative of the Euderma-Plecotus stock, Euderma maculatum has traveled a road of independent specialization to the point where it is possibly overspecialized. Genus Puecotus: From the study of Recent and fossil material, I infer that the hypothetical ancestor from which the subgenera Idionycteris, Plecotus, and Corynorhinus were derived probably had the following characteristics: Tooth rows not crowded; I' bicuspidate; I? simple, about two-thirds the height of I'; upper canine strong and exceeding P* in height; P! robust, considerably exceeding cingulum of canine in height; P* with full hypocone surface, a large anterior cingu- lum, and a protocone cusp; M! and M? without trace of a hypocone cusp; M?* with prominent metacone and a fourth commissure; lower incisor series strongly imbricated and increasing in size from J, to I;; lower canine equaling protoconid cusp of M, in height; P, much more robust than P;; P, double-rooted; lower molars with internal cusps almost equaling external cusps in height. Rostrum narrow and arched; anterior nares not enlarged; supraorbital region sharply ridged; temporal ridges not forming a sagittal crest; zygoma strong and expanded in middle third; basial pits not developed; median postpalatal prominence absent. Nostril with full cornu and lacking posterior elongation; muzzle glands not enlarged; auricle large, with a simple, complete anterior basal lobe, a small accessory anterior basal lobe, and transverse ribs not reaching the posterior margin of the auricle. From this generalized or primitive pattern, derivations, either in the form of reduction or simplification or in the form of elaboration, are to be regarded as traits of specialization or progressiveness. In 110 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 no instance are these bats sufficiently well known to determine the teleological significance of these traits. The differences distinguishing the subgenera Idionycteris, Plecotus, and Corynorhinus mainly concern the external configuration of the nostril, muzzle, and ears (table 2). Dental, cranial, and skeletal differences are numerous but slight (table 3). In the following dis- cussion, Plecotus townsendw is given as a typical example of the subgenus Corynorhinus. Unless otherwise noted, statements regard- ing it apply equally to the other Recent species of the subgenus, P. mexicanus and P. rafinesquii. The subgenera Plecotus and Idio- nycteris are monotypic, represented respectively by the species P. auritus and P. phyllotis. Inasmuch as P. phyllotis is known to me only from three specimens, statements concerning it must be regarded as highly tentative. The dental formula is the same in the three subgenera, and, as may be seen from the following comparisons, the individual teeth must be closely scrutinized in order to detect differences. The secondary cusp of I! is absent or variable in P. townsendii, usually present in P. mexicanus, and always present in P. rafinesquit, P. phyllotis, and P. auritus. The space between IJ? and the canine is frequently, but not always, greater, and P! averages larger in P. auri- tus than in the other species. FP* is consistently wider than long in P. phyllotis and P. townsendi; longer than wide in P. auritus. Be- cause the metacone of M?® is somewhat reduced in P. auritus, the third commissure of M? is equal to or shorter than the second in most individuals, whereas in P. phyllotis and P. townsendii the third com- missure is normally equal to or longer than the second. P, is usually more robust in P. auritus and P. phyllotis than in P. townsendii, considerably exceeding P; in size. P, is double-rooted in P. auritus; single-rooted in P. phyllotis and P. townsendii. In P. phyllotis the internal cusps of the mandibular molars are almost as high as the external cusps; in the other species of Plecotus the internal cusps are lower. An analysis of these observations on dentition reveals four features, which, because each is consistent in at least one of the subgenera, may be regarded as having primary taxonomic significance. These fea- tures are the simplification in I’, M?, and P, respectively, and the specialization in P*. P. phyllotis exhibits the generalized (unsimpli- fied and unspecialized) condition in three features, is specialized in one (P,); whereas P. auritus is specialized in two (P* and M?); and all of the species of the subgenus Corynorhinus are specialized in one (P,) and one of the species in another (I'). Three other features— crowding of the upper incisor series and diminution of the size of P! and P;—are inconsistent, but may be of some significance. In these AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY Euderma Median postpalatal process a bifid prominence. Auditory bullae roughly elliptical in outline. Brain case relatively long: post- palatal length averages 40-41% of greatest length. Presternum longer than wide. Upper incisors stand in line with toothrow. I! almost as small as I’. P! minute; not exceeding cingulum of canine in height. Hypocone cusp barely indicated in M! and M?. Lower canine small; not exceeding P, in height. Anterointernal cusp of lower ca- nine almost equal to primary cusp in height. TasBLE 1.—Morphological characters distinguishing Euderma from Plecotus Plecotus Median postpalatal process absent or a simple spine. Auditory bullae roughly circular in outline. Brain case relatively short: post- palatal length averages 34-38% of greatest length. Presternum wider than long (un- known in Plecotus phyllotis). Upper incisors stand inside tooth- row. I! a third higher and twice as wide as J?, P! larger; exceeding cingulum of canine in height. Hypocone cusp not indicated in M! and M?. Lower canine large; much exceeding P, in height. Anterointernal cusp of lower canine small and greatly exceeded by pri- mary cusp. P; absent. P, with well defined metaconid cusp. Tragus lacking basal lobe. Tragus united with posterior basal lobe of auricle. Coloration black and white in bold pattern. 497256—59——__2 P3 present. P, lacking metaconid cusp. Tragus with prominent basal-lobe. Tragus and posterior basal lobe of auricle not united. Coloration drab brownish, essen- tially without pattern. 111 112 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VoL. 110 TaBLE 2.—Comparison of external characters of the subgenera of Plecotus (Idionyc- teris most generalized, Corynorhinus most specialized, Plecotus intermediate) Idionycteris Nostril unspecialized. Muzzle glands not en- larged (?). Auricle with anterior basal lobe complete. Accessory anterior basal lobe of auricle devel- oped into a projecting lappet. Transverse ribs on auri- cle fade out before reaching posterior border. Second phalanx of third digit longer than first phalanx. Calear keeled. Interfemoral membrane attached to tip of last caudal vertebra. Plecotus Nostril with posterior elongation; cornu re- duced. Muzzle glands slightly enlarged. As in Idionycteris. Accessory anterior bas- al lobe of auricle slightly developed. Transverse ribs on au- ricle run without in- terruption to poste- rior border. Second phalanx of third digit equal to or shorter than first phalanx. Calcar not keeled. Interfemoral mem- brane attached to base of last caudal vertebra. Corynorhinus Nostril with posterior elongation; cornu absent. Muzzle glands greatly enlarged. Auricle with anterior basal lobe reduced. Accessory anterior basal lobe of auricle absent. Transverse ribs on au- ricle interrupted by vertical rib near posterior border. As in Idionycteris. As in Plecotus. As in Idionycteris. features P. phyllotis is generalized in one (P,) and is dubiously special- ized in the others; P. auritus is generalized in all; and P. townsendit is specialized in all. Likewise, in cranial details specialization is greatest in P. town- sendii, least in P. phyllotis (fig. 4). In the more primitive species, P. phyllotis and P. auritus, the supraorbital region is sharply ridged; in P. townsendu it is smoothly rounded [also in the Lower Pleistocene P. crassidens; faintly ridged in the Middle Pleistocene P. (Coryno- rhinus) alleganiensis]. The temporal ridges converge to form a median sagittal crest in P. auritus and P. townsendii, but remain apart in P. phyllotis and to a lesser degree in P. alleganiensis. AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY TABLE 3.—Comparison of crania of the subgenera of Plecotus (Idionycteris most generalized, Corynorhinus most specialized, Plecotus intermediate) Idionycteris Supraorbital region sharply ridged. Zygoma relatively thick and strong; postorbi- tal expansion in mid- dle third of arch. Median postpalatal process absent. Basial pits absent. Brain case relatively shallow: averages 33% of greatest length. Brain case relatively broad: averages 53% of greatest length. Rostrum flattened, with median concavity. P4 wider than long. Metacone of M? not re- duced; 3rd commis- sure equal to or long- er than 2nd. P, single-rooted. Plecotus As in Idionycteris. As in Idionycteris. Median postpalatal process a poorly de- veloped spine. As in Idionycteris. Brain case relatively shallow: averages 32% of greatest length. Brain case relatively narrow: averages 49% of greatest length. Rostrum arched, lack- ing median concav- ity. P4 longer than wide. Metacone of M? re- duced; 8rd commis- sure usually equal to or shorter than 2nd. P, double-rooted. Corynorhinus Supraorbital region smoothly rounded or faintly ridged. Zygomarelatively thin and fragile; post- orbital expansion in posterior third of arch. Median postpalatal process a prominent spine. Basial pits prominent. Brain case relatively deep: averages 35- 38% of greatest length. Brain case relatively narrow: averages 48-50% of greatest length. As in Idionycteris. As in Idionycteris. As in Idionycteris. As in Idionycteris. 113 Broadening and anterior bulging of the brain case in P. phylilotis and increase in depth of the brain case in P. townsendii may be re- garded as specializations. Shortening, broadening, and flattening of the rostrum together with enlargement of the anterior nares in P. townsendu are specializations that are somewhat paralleled in P. 114 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 NU PLECOTUS (GORYNORHINUS) RAFINESQUI!I USNM 297218 LATERAL LOBE VENTRAL LOBE POSTERIOR PLECOTUS (CORYNORHINUS) TOWNSENDII LOBE CM 18760 ae Sf PLEGOTUS (PLEGOTUS) AURITUS USNM 18487 Figure 5.—Comparison of the presternum of three species of Plecotus. Ventral (left) and lateral (right) aspects. Camera lucida sketches. phyllotis, although the anterior nares are not enlarged in the latter species. The zygomatic arches show progressive reduction and weakening through the series from relatively heavy and strong in P. phyllotis and P. auritus to relatively light and weak in P. townsendii. Also, in the latter species there is a shift of the postorbital expansion of the zygoma, from its primitive median position to a posterior location. The median postpalatal process, absent in P. phyllotis, is slightly developed in P. auritus, and is a prominent spine in P. mexicanus and in some forms of P. townsendw. The lateral grooves (‘‘basial pits’’) commencing in the basioccipital and ending abruptly in the basisphe- noid are prominent in P. townsendvi; they are ill-defined or absent in the more primitive P. phyllotis and P. auritus. Slight elongation of the auditory bullae is a specialization peculiar to P. phyllotis. The AMERICAN BATS—-HANDLEY 115 typical vespertilionid bullar shape, as seen in P. auritus and P. town- sendii, is roughly circular. The postcranial skeleton is unknown in P. phyllotis and differences in this respect between P. auritus and P. townsendii are few. In the latter species the proximal articular surface of the radius is expanded, and the presternum has the ventral lobe enlarged and the posterior lobe laterally expanded (fig. 5). P. auritus has departed from the usual phalangeal pattern of Plecotus and EHuderma, in which the second phalanx of the third digit is longer than the first (by a slight elongation of the first phalanx and a considerable shortening of the second), rendering not only the proportion different but the combined length less (fig. 6). The calcaral keel, present in P. phyllotis, is lacking in the other species of Plecotus. Hamilton (1949, p. 100) pointed out distinctions between the bacula of P. rafinesquu and P. auritus (as described and figured by Matthews, 1937, p. 222). However, intrageneric discrepancies of similar magnitude seem also to exist among the several species of Myotis, Prpistrellus, and Lasiurus as described and figured by these same authors. Krutzsch and Vaughan (1955, p. 99) described the PLECOTUS (CORYNORHINUS) USNM 297218 ae II 4 4 Ce 7 7 Pd PLEGOTUS (PLEGOTUS) AURITUS al: f USNM 18487 7 7 7 2 7 oO TTS Vv Iv Figure 6.—Pectoral appendages of Plecotus, showing relative proportions of first and second phalanges of third digit. RAFINESQUI! 116 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 baculum of P. townsendw as being similar to that of P. rafinesqutt. Pearson, Koford, and Pearson (1952, p. 281) noted that the subgenera Plecotus and Corynorhinus “possess in common two pairs of Cowper’s glands, a feature not found in other vespertilionids. Likewise, seminal vesicles apparently are lacking in both of these genera [sub- genera].” Of all the morphological features distinguishing the species of Plecotus, those of the muzzle and external ears have been supposed to be of the greatest taxonomic significance. Enlarged muzzle glands in P. townsendw protrude as grotesque lumps two to three millimeters high on either side of the muzzle (fig. 7). There are similar glandular areas on the muzzle of P. auritus, but they do not project as in P. townsendii. They may not be con- spicuous in P. phyllotis; there is no external trace of them on three dry study skins. Dalquest and Werner (1954, p. 156) have observed that the facial glands of P. rafinesquii are histologically similar to those of other vespertilionids, particularly Myotis and Pipistrellus. The prominent muzzle glands (or ‘‘nose lumps’’) are solid masses of skin covered sebaceous glandular tissue. There are in addition, in the facial area, nests of sebaceous glandular cells, sudoriferous glands, and a sublingual gland of the mucous type. The submaxillary gland apparently has been forced out of the facial area by the extensive development of the other glandular tissues. A peculiar posterior elongation of the nostril in P. auritus gives the nostril a crescentic shape (fig.8). The cornu surrounding the narial opening is slightly reduced from the primitive vespertilionid condition, as seen in Myotis and Pipistrellus, and there is a conspicuous shallow basin extending posteriad from the posterolateral corner of the opening and separated from it by a septum. A similar posterior elongation of the nostril in P. townsendii is partially concealed by the overlapping muzzle glands. In this species the cornu is reduced to the point of obliteration, and the narial opening is squarish in outline and is bordered by smooth pale-colored skin resembling the lining of the nostril. As in P. auritus, the narial opening proper and the posterior elongation are separated by a septum. In the available specimens of P. phyllotis the nostrils appear to approximate the primitive vespertilionid type, with full cornua and without posterior elongations. The snout is truncate in P. auritus and P. townsendvi rather than acute as in Huderma maculatum and most other vespertilionines (pos- sibly acute in P. phyllotis). A lappet projecting over the forehead from the anterior base of the auricle is the chief characteristic of P. phyllotis. This appendage is an enlargement of the accessory anterior basal lobe of the auricle (fig. AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY oul WA 9), a lobe that is present, although small and inconspicuous, in P. auritus but absent in P. townsendw. Modification also occurs in the primary anterior basal lobe, where variation ranges from reduction in P. townsendii to no modification in P. phyllotis and enlargement in P. auritus (fig. 9). Thus, with regard to the dental, osteological, and external charac- teristics of these bats, it appears that P. (dionycteris) phyllotis is the most generalized and primitive member of the group; P. (Coryno- rhinus) townsend is most specialized and progressive; and P. (Plecotus) auritus is intermediate (but nearer P. townsendir). Comparison of Plecotus with other vespertilionine genera confirms the observation that the differences among its species are, at most, of no more than subgeneric magnitude. Myotis, Pipistrellus, and PLEGOTUS (CORYNORHINUS) TOWNSENDII USNM 148550 ra PLEGOTUS (PLEGOTUS) AURITUS USNM 8660I MYOTIS VEL USNM 102472 Ficure 7.—Muzzles of Plecotus, compared in anterolateral aspect with the muzzle of Myotis, a generalized vespertilionid. Camera lucida sketches. 118 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Eptesicus are not suitable for such a comparison because of the prob- ability that they are polyphyletic aggregations, and not natural groups. Most of the other vespertilionine genera are either monotypic, consist of slightly differentiated species, are of disputed validity, or are not sufficiently well known. The American genus Lasiurus is a notable exception, being well known, widely distributed, and contain- ing several well-differentiated species. Included in the genus are the red bats (LZ. borealis, etc.), hoary bats (L. cinereus, etc.), and yellow bats (ZL. ega, etc.). The magnitude of the differences distinguishing these species equals or exceeds the magnitude of the differences dis- tinguishing the species Plecotus phyllotis, P. auritus, and P. townsendii (compare tables 2, 3, and 4). Stratus oF Genus BarpasteLua: Miller (1907, p. 224) pointed out the likeness of Barbastella to EHuderma and Plecotus, whereas Tate (1942, p. 230) tried to show that any relationship between Barbastella and these genera isremote. Tate believed that Huderma and Plecotus are derivatives of the Myotis stem, and he supposed that Barbastella came from the Pipistrellus stem. The strongest resemblances of Barbastella to Pipistrellus are in tooth formula, and in the posterior shortening of the palate, which extends only a short distance past M*. Like Pipistrellus, but also like Myotis as well, Barbastella has small, relatively simple auditory bullae; fragile, much-reduced zygomata without postorbital expan- sions; and a short angular process of the mandible. The few resem- blances of Barbastella to Pipistrellus and its relatives seem to lose much of their significance, however, in view of the many similarities of Barbastella to Euderma and Plecotus: . Rostrum relatively narrow and weak. . Brain case elongated and vaulted in frontal region. . Zygomata (in dorsal aspect) parallel and not bowed out posteriorly. . Coronoid process of mandible high. . Dentition weak. . Cusps of teeth high and sharp. Lower incisors graduated in size (I; large to I, small). . I; with prominent extra internal cusp (total of 4 cusps). . Lower canine with prominent anterointernal basal cusp. . Pg not so high as M,. SCHOANOORWN HE — The resemblance of the teeth in Barbastella, Euderma, and Plecotus is particularly striking. In shape and proportions, the teeth of these genera are almost identical. ‘The facts that one of the upper pre- molars (P!) has been crowded out of the tooth row and that one of the lower premolars (P;) has been eliminated in Barbastella are not sufficient in themselves to indicate that Barbastella is closely related to Pipistrellus. (Note that Huderma also has the same dental for- mula as Pipistrellus.) AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 119 Tasue 4.—Morphological characteristics of bats of the genus Lasiurus red bats (L. borealis, ete.) Size small (forearm 37-44 mm.) Lateral wings of pre- sternum equal to body of presternum in width. Presternum about as long as wide. Auditory bullae not enlarged. Rostrum relatively short. Sagittal crest very weak. Coronoid process medium height. P! usually present. Hypocone slightly re- duced on M! & M?., M3 very reduced. P, double-rooted. M; talonid reduced. hoary bats (L. cinereus, etc.) Size large (forearm 46-57 mm.) yellow bats (L. ega, etc.) Size large (forearm 44-57 mm.) Lateral wings of pre- sternum equal to body of presternum in width. Presternum much longer than wide. Auditory bullae slightly enlarged. Rostrum medium. Sagittal crest weak. Coronoid process low. P! usually present. Hypocone much re- duced on M! & M?. M3 reduced. P, single-rooted. M; talonid only slightly reduced. Lateral wings of pre- sternum consider- ably broader than body of prester- num. Presternum about as long as wide. Auditory bullae not enlarged. Rostrum relatively long. Sagittal crest strong. Coronoid process high. P! always absent. Hypocone slightly re- duced on M! & M2. M3 slightly reduced. P, double-rooted. M; talonid much re- duced. Barbastella is unique in the degree of posterior extension of the anterior nares, which reach so far back that the vomer is exposed as a Median spine. the subgenus Corynorhinus. Its muzzle glands are almost as large as those in A pair of deep grooves extend from the nostrils to the upper lip. The auricles are peculiarly short and broad and are connected across the forehead. In each there is a conspicuous subapical lobe on the posterior border, and the posterior basal lobe is attached nearer the angle of the mouth than in Luderma or Plecotus. 120 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VoL. 110 PLEGOTUS (CGORYNORHINUS) TOWNSEROI USNM 149550 (RIGHT MUZZLE GLAND REMOVED TO EXPOSE FULL Is nae, EXTENT OF POSTERIOR aia a Sooty MUZZLE GLAND PLECOTUS (PLEGOTUS) AURITUS POSTERIOR ELONGATION USNM 16386 SEPTUM NARIAL OPENING CORNU MYOTIS VELIFER USNM 102472 Ficure 8.—Muzzles of Plecotus, compared in anterodorsal aspect with the muzzle of Myotis, a generalized vespertilionid. Camera lucida sketches. The tragus is relatively long, is broad at the base, and tapers abruptly to a pointed tip. Barbastella is a relative of Huderma and Plecotus that lacks the ex- treme auditory specialization characterizing these genera. In this respect, Barbastella must be more primitive than Huderma and Plecotus. On the other hand, in most cranial details Barbastella is similar to Euderma and Plecotus, and in some features such as fragile zygomata, large anterior nares, posterior nares lying far forward, and short tooth rows it has surpassed them in degree of specialization. If the assumption is correct that Barbastella is closely related to Euderma and Plecotus, then it follows that most of the cranial char- acters shared by the three genera must have been established before auditory specialization occurred. Further, the Barbastella stock must AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 1 PA PLEGOTUS (CORYNORHINUS) TOWNSENDI USNM 148550 PLEGOTUS (PLEGOTUS) AURITUS USNM 86667 TRANSVERSE RIBS ANTERIOR BASAL LOBE TRAGUS ACCESSORY ANTERIOR BASAL LOBE POSTERIOR BASAL LOBE CONNECTING MEMBRANE PLECOTUS (IDIONYCTERIS) PHYLLOTIS AMNH 62260 MCZ 5943 Ficure 9.—Variation in the auricle and its appendages in Plecotus. Free-hand sketches. have been derived very early and had a long subsequent period of in- dependent development and specialization. Systematic Treatment Key to the genera Euderma and Plecotus Posterior basal lobe of auricle attached to base of tragus; auditory bulla elongated | (elliptical in outline); I! almost as small as I?; hypocone cusp indicated on M! and M?; lower canine small, but its anterointernal cusp greatly enlarged; Ps | absent; P4 with well defined metaconid cusp; coloration black and white in j bold pattern... . . . . . Euderma (p. 122) ) Posterior basal lobe of Ruricle Renarared for irae by a notch; auditory bulla not elongated (circular in outline); I’ a third higher and twice as wide as [?; | hypocone cusp not indicated on M! and M?; lower canine large, but its antene internal cusp small; P; present; P, lacking metaconid cusp; coloration drab | brownish, essentially without pattern. ...... . . . Pleeotus (p. 127) P22 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Genus Kuderma H. Allen Histiotus J. A. Allen, 1891, p. 195. (Part.) Euderma H. Allen, 1892, p. 467. Type species: Histiotus maculatus J. A. Allen. DistriBuTIon: Southwestern United States and probably north- western Mexico. Description: Supraorbital region sharply ridged (fig. 4); temporal ridges not coalescing posteriorly to form a sagittal crest; brain case exceptionally elongated; zygoma relatively heavy, with postorbital expansion in middle third of arch; median postpalatal process a bifid prominence; auditory bulla roughly elliptical in outline; presternum longer than wide. Upper incisors in line with tooth row; I’ simple, without accessory cusps (fig. 2), except occasionally near cingulum, and small, only slightly larger than I’; I? close to or touching upper canine; P! minute; hypocone cusp barely indicated on M! and M?; third commissure longer than second and metacone relatively well developed in M?; lower canine reduced in thickness, not exceeding P, in height, and possessing a prominent anterointernal secondary cusp almost equaling primary cusp in height; P; about one-half the size of P,, and not crowded; P; absent; P, single-rooted and possessing a well defined metaconid cusp. No large glandular masses on muzzle (fig. 7); nostril opening small, of primitive vespertilionid type (fig. 8), provided with a cornu, and not extended posteriorly or opening upward; auricle and tragus very large (fig. 9); tragus not provided with a basal lobe, but united with posterior basal lobe of auricle; anterior basal lobe of auricle complete; transverse ribs on auricle extend to posterior border of auricle; second phalanx of third digit longer than first phalanx (fig. 6); calcar not keeled; interfemoral membrane attached to base of last caudal vertebra; coloration black and white in bold pattern; mem- branes and ears grayish. Euderma maculatum J. A. Allen Histiotus maculatus J. A. Allen, 1891, p. 195. Euderma maculata H. Allen, 1894, p. 61. Hototypr: AMNH 3920/2991; young adult skin (skull lost sub- sequent to original description) ; ‘“‘caught on a fence” in March 1890, by Thomas Shooter; near Piru, Ventura County, Calif. [probably mouth of Castac Creek, Santa Clara Valley, 8 miles east of Piru, Los Angeles County, Calif. (Miller, 1897, p. 49)]. DistRiBuTION: Southwestern United States and probably north- western Mexico (fig. 10). West to Washoe County, Nev.; Mariposa, AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY W3 Kern, and Los Angeles Counties, Calif. South to Riverside County, Calif.; Yuma County, Ariz.; (?Magdalena, Sonora?); Dona Ana County, N. Mex. East to Dona Ana County, N. Mex.; San Juan and Salt Lake Counties, Utah; Yellowstone County, Mont. North to Yellowstone County, Mont.; Canyon County, Idaho; Washoe County, Nev. Zonal range: Lower Austral to Transition. Altitudinal range: 189 feet below sea level in Riverside County, Calif., to 4,045 feet in Mariposa County, Calif. Only 16 specimens are known to be preserved in museums. Description: As indicated above. Adult coloration: Upper parts blackish with large, roughly circular, white spots on the shoulders Figure 10.—Distribution of Euderma maculatum J. A. Allen. Solid symbols, specimens in museums; open symbols, other records; encircled solid symbol, type locality. 124 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VoL. 110 and at the base of the tail, and patches of cottony white hair at the posterior base of each auricle; all hairs black at base, except those at posterior bases of auricles. Underparts with hairs white tipped, the white incompletely concealing the black bases. Membranes pale grayish brown, auricles and tragi yellowish brown. MEASUREMENTs: See tables 7, 13. Remarks: USNM 269842, not reported previously, was captured 9 miles east of Roll, Yuma County, Ariz., on 5 August 1940, and was submitted to the National Museum by Mrs. W. A. Jones, Box 3, Roll, Ariz. It is an adult, probably a male, mummified, with the skull still inside the skin. In Mrs. Jones’ words, the details of its capture were as follows: Dear Sirs. Am sending a bat of a kind I haven’t seen before. ... The bat was captured the fifth of August, here at my home. It was a very hot day, and the bat kept coming and lighting on the screened porch. My son [Weldon Allen, Jr.], nine years old, caught it and brought itin the house. We gave it water. It was very thirsty. It lived about three hours after catching it. ... I wish you could have seen the bat when it was alive. It was a pretty thing in an odd way. Hasirat: Huderma has seldom been collected or observed alive by a mammalogist, despite the fact that it inhabits one of the most in- tensively collected areas of the world. At least five of the records for it can be attributed to small boys, and many of the other records stem from persons neither scientists nor naturalists. Use of mist nets and other trapping devices has failed to produce specimens. Euderma appears to be an inhabitant primarily of open or scrub country. There is only one record of occurrence in a forest, in Yosemite Valley, Calif. (Parker, 1952, p. 480); however, Vorhies (1935, p. 225) quoted Herbert Brown as stating that Arizona Indians assured him it was a forest dweller. Usually it has been found in or on houses—in biological laboratory (Miller, 1903, p. 165; Hall, 1935, p. 148) ; in residence (Nicholson, 1950, p. 197); on porch (Hardy, 1941, p. 293; Mrs. W. A. Jones, 1940, in litt.; Benson, 1954, p. 117); under eaves of house (Durrant, 1935, p. 226; Ashcraft, 1932, p. 162); clinging to side of brush house (Vorhies, 1935, p. 225); in driveway near house (Tucker, 1957, p. 406). Less frequently it has been observed in caves or cave-like structures—in moist cave (Hardy, 1941, p. 293); in springhouse dug into hillside (Parker, 1952, p. 481); in mine tunnel (Vorhies, 1935, p. 225); in root cellar (Hall, 1946, p. 158). One that was being attacked by yellow jackets when found perhaps had tried to creep into a crevice or tree hole where these insects nested (Parker, 1952, p. 480). Several specimens have been in or near water— floating in puddle, the overflow from a railway water tank (J. Grinnell, 1910, p. 317); floating in shallow reservoir (Benson, 1954, p. 117); AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 125 damp and bedraggled, one foot from river’s edge (Parker, 1952, p. 480); hanging from rock projection in closed springhouse (Parker, 1952, p. 481); hibernating above large pool of water in cave (Hardy, 1941, p. 293). One was found hanging [impaled?] on a fence (J. A. Allen, 1891, p. 195) and one with injured wing was found clinging to the lower side of a rock at the base of a cliff (Hall, 1939, p. 103). Five of the specimens were dead, two were obviously injured, and all but one of the remainder died within a few hours after capture. Several that were obtained alive showed great thirst for water, and at least 10 of the live individuals were exposed to daylight where found. Of the 22 recorded occurrences, 13 were about houses. Six of the 13 were clinging to the outside of the structures. The normal habitat of this species is unknown. The foregoing facts suggest departures from its normal habitat in response to stimuli of rather frequent occurrence. A narrow tolerance in habitat selection by the spotted bat could explain the lack of natural collections and the frequency of abnormal ones. Suppose that the bat’s habitat were very restricted and were such that it might frequently change to the bat’s disadvantage. Suppose for instance that Huderma maculatum requires absolute privacy from other bats and requires moist places for roosting in its normally arid surroundings. This might restrict it largely to moist crevices, which because of their limited extent might occasionally dry up and force the bat out, to alight, thirsty and dying from desiccation, on porches, sides of houses, in driveways, etc. The spotted bat fits very well Amadon’s description (1953, p. 464), of relict species: Relicts are species that tend to become more and more restricted both geo- graphically and ecologically, because they are unable to compete successfully with other species. . . . On continents, relicts often survive by becoming more and more specialized, through a process of natural selection, to a narrow ecological niche where they do manage to retain a competitive advantage. Bruavior: Most recorded individuals appear to have been solitary wanderers. Although Huderma maculatum has been observed at all seasons, seven of the 17 occurrences for which the date is recorded are for the months of August, September, and October, the period of post- breeding season wandering characteristic of many bats. Only at Yosemite Valley, Calif., where two specimens were collected 20 years apart, has more than one specimen been secured, although Hardy (1941, p. 293) was told that four had been found hibernating in a Utah cave. C. Hart Merriam was told by ranchers in the Vegas Valley, Nev., that “a very large bat ‘with ears like a jackass and a white stripe on each shoulder’ is abundant in that place in the summer” (Miller, 1897, p. 49). Two reports suggest possible association of Huderma with other 126 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 species of bats. Vorhies (1935, p. 225) quoted Mexican informants as saying “‘there were many bats in the drifts [side shafts of a mine] and among them was the one spotted one.”” Hardy (1941, p. 293) observed Myotis subulatus and Plecotus townsendii in a Utah cave in which Euderma had been reported. Apparently Huderma rests suspended by the feet with head down (Parker, 1952, p. 480); an informant of Hardy (1941, p. 293) reported hibernating individuals suspended by the thumbs, with head up. Parker (1952, p. 480) recorded that a captive specimen walked with wrists and feet, and could thus travel over horizontal surfaces with considerable facility. Durrant (1935, p. 226) was told that a captive moved about its cage in pursuit of flies held with forceps. When the bat is alert the normal carriage of the ear is erect, directed slightly forward, with tip bent slightly back. When disturbed, the bat folds ears, but not the tragus, down against the side of the neck, much in the fashion of Plecotus townsendit (Parker, 1952, p. 480). Some individuals were docile, with little inclination to resist handling (Parker, 1952, p. 481), but one was said to have “had plenty of fight’’ when molested (Hall, 1939, p. 103). One was being attacked by one or more ‘yellow jackets,” and had sustained injury to the humeral areas of both wings when it was found. It was attempting to fend off the insects with its feet (Parker, 1952, p. 480). The voice of this bat has been described as a “soft, extremely high- pitched, metallic squeak”’ (Parker, 1952, p. 481); a hissing noise and rat-like squeak (Hall, 1939, p. 103); and a typical bat chirp (Durrant, 1935, p. 226). Also, it clicks its teeth together (Hall, 1939, p. 103) and makes ‘‘a queer grinding noise by gnashing its teeth” (Ashcraft, 1932, p. 162). The report of an individual that flew through an open door or win- dow into a house at about 11 p.m. (Nicholson, 1950, p. 197) indicates that Huderma, like Plecotus auritus, may be nocturnal rather than crepuscular. Foop: Although several captive individuals eagerly accepted water to drink, few showed interest in various types of food. One ate cottage cheese (Parker, 1952, p. 481). Another, force-fed at first, later readily took flies offered with forceps. It accepted five flies at each of two daily feeding periods. When flies were offered it wrinkled up its nose, chirped, and advanced as rapidly as possible to seize the fly. It also eagerly pursued empty forceps. This individual lived for three weeks in captivity. Its death was accidental (Durrant, 1935, p. 226). Food habits under natural conditions are not known. Data on migration, hibernation, reproduction, and molt are lacking for this species. Loca NAMEs: ‘“‘Spotted”’ bat is the name in most general usage, AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 127 although Hardy (1941, p. 293) referred to the use of the name “‘pinto”’ bat in Utah, and Vorhies (1935, p. 225) reported that Mexicans knew it as ‘‘pinto” bat in Sonora. Nevadan ranchers likened its ears to those of a jackass (Miller, 1897, p. 49) and Grinnell (1910, p. 318) likened its dorsal color pattern to a “‘death’s-head.”’ Two boys who discovered one on the side of a brush house mistook it, at first glance, for a young rabbit (Vorhies, 1935, p. 225), while a boy who saw one crawling on the ground first thought it was a tarantula spider (Parker, 1952, p. 480). People who saw one with its ears folded back thought it was “some sort of horned beast’”’ (Parker, 1952, p. 480). SPECIMENS EXAMINED: Five, from the following U.S. localities: New Mexico: Dona Ana County: Mesilla Park, la (USNM). Arizona: Yuma County: 9 miles east of Roll, ls (USNM); 4 miles south of Yuma, Is (MCZ). Cautrornia: Los Angeles County: Mouth of Castac Creek, 8 miles east of Piru, ls (AMNH). Uran: Salt Lake County: Salt Lake City, Is (UU). ADDITIONAL RECORDS (asterisk indicates specimen preserved in a museum) : MEXICO: Sonora: Near Magdalena (Vorhies, 1935, p. 225). UNITED STATES: Arizona: Maricopa County: Tempe* (Stager, 1957, p. 260). Catirornia: Kern County: Red Rock Canyon*, 30-40 miles north of Mohave (Hall, 1939, p. 103). Mariposa County: Yosemite National Park’, Yosemite Valley, 4,045 feet, 2 specimens (Ashcraft, 1932, p. 162; Parker, 1952, p. 480). Riverside County: Mecca*, 189 feet below sea level (J. Grinneil, 1910, p. 317). San Bernardino County: China Lake*, 4 miles south of Inyo County line (Stager, 1957, p. 260); Granite Wells, near Pilot Knob, Barstow area (Parker, 1952, p. 481); Twentynine Palms* (Benson, 1954, p. 117). NEevapa: Clark County: Vegas Ranch, Vegas Valley (Miller, 1897, p. 49). Esmeralda County: Fish Lake Valley (Hall, 1946, p. 158). Washoe County: Reno* (Hall, 1935, p. 148). Uraun: Garfield County: Hatch (Hardy, 1941, p. 293). Kane County: Crocodile Cave, 4 miles north of Kanab (Hardy, 1941, p. 293). San Juan County: 5 miles northwest of Monticello* (Benson, 1954, p.117). Ipano: Canyon County: 15 miles southwest of Caldwell* (Tucker, 1957, p. 406). Montana: Yellowstone County: Billings* (Nicholson, 1950, p. 197). Genus Plecotus EK. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire The synonymy is given under the subgenera. Types specizs: Vespertilio auritus Linnaeus. Distripution: Temperate parts of North America, Eurasia, and northern Africa (Palaearctic and Nearctic regions) (fig. 11). Description: Supraorbital region sharply ridged or smoothly rounded (fig. 4); temporal ridges remain apart or coalesce to form sagittal crest; brain case relatively short; zygoma relatively heavy or light, with postorbital expansion in middle or posterior third of arch; median postpalatal process absent or a spine-like prominence; auditory bulla roughly circular in outline; presternum wider than long. 497256—59 3 128 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 E 7 , Ficure 11.—Distribution of Plecotus, showing coincidence with the North Temperate Zone (here defined as a region having an average annual temperature between 35° and 70° F.). Upper incisors not in line with remainder of tooth row (lingual); I’ simple or bifid (fig. 2), much larger than I’; I? not touching canine; P! small; hypocone absent and protocone reduced posteriorly in M? and M?; size of third commissure and metacone variable in M?’; lower canine much exceeding P, in height, and possessing a well defined, al- though small, anterointernal basal cusp; P; and P; small and crowded or not; P, single-rooted or double-rooted and lacking a well defined metaconid cusp. Muzzle provided with dorsolateral glandular masses which in some forms rise above the muzzle as peculiar lumps (fig. 7); nostril openings small and of primitive vespertilionid type or large, opening upward, and peculiarly extended posteriorly (fig. 8); auricle and tragus large (fig. 9); tragus provided with a prominent basal lobe, and not united with posterior basal lobe of auricle; anterior basal lobe of auricle normal, expanded, or reduced; transverse ribs on auricle variable in posterior extension; second phalanx of third digit longer or shorter than third phalanx (fig. 6); calear keeled or not; interfemoral mem- brane attached to base or tip of last caudal vertebra; coloration brown, without pattern, except for ventral pallor; membranes and ears brownish. Key to subgenera of Plecotus 1. Nostril unspecialized; accessory basal lobe of auricle developed into a projecting lappet; calcar keeled; brain case broad (53 percent of greatest length). Subgenus Idionycteris (p. 129) Nostril with posterior elongation and reduction of cornu; accessory basal lobe of auricle absent or only slightly developed; calcar not keeled; brain case narrow (averaging 48-50 percent of greatest length). ...... Jai a4 | | | | | AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 129 2. Supraorbital region sharply ridged; postorbital expansion of zygoma in middle third of arch; basial pits absent; P4 longer than wide; 3d commissure of M® equal to or shorter than 2d; Ps double-rooted; muzzle glands'slightly enlarged; anterior basal lobe of auricle complete; 2d phalanx of 3d digit shorter than isiphalank 34.0. . . . . . Subgenus Plecotus (p. 132) Supraorbital region emoothiy Pounded or faintly ridged; post orbital ex- pansion of zygoma in posterior third of arch; basial pits prominent; P4 wider than long; 3d commissure of M? equal to or longer than 2d; P single- rooted; muzzle glands greatly enlarged; anterior basal lobe of auricle re- duced; 2d phalanx of 3d digit longer than Ist phalanx. Subgenus Corynorhinus (p. 136) Subgenus Idionycteris Anthony Plecotus J. A. Allen, 1881, p. 184. (Part.) Corynorhinus G. M. Allen, 1916, p. 352. (Part.) Idionycteris Anthony, 1923, p. 1. Typr sprcius: Jdionycteris mexicanus Anthony. Distrispution: Northeastern Mexico and southwestern United States (fig. 12). Description: Supraorbital region sharply ridged (fig. 4); temporal ridges do not coalesce to form a sagittal crest; rostrum broad for a Plecotus, flattened, and with pronounced middorsal concavity; brain case relatively broad and shallow; zygoma relatively thick and strong in appearance, with postorbital expansion in middle third of arch; median postpalatal process absent; basial pits absent; auditory bulla slightly elongated in outline. I! with accessory cusp (fig. 2), near base of tooth; P! small, barely exceeding cingulum of canine in height; P* wider than long; space between posterointernal edge of P* and anterior edge of M!' only about one-third the lingual length of P*; third commissure of M? equal to or longer than second commissure (fourth commissure may be barely indicated); metacone of M®? fairly prominent; P; much larger than P3; P, single-rooted. Glandular masses on muzzle not noticeably enlarged (fig. 7); nostril of primitive vespertilionid type, with well-defined cornu (fig. 8); auricle with anterior basal lobe complete, but not prolonged beyond anterior edge of auricle (fig. 9); accessory anterior basal lobe enlarged and produced beyond edge of auricle as a “lappet’”’; transverse ribs on auricle may or may not extend to posterior edge of auricle;! tragus relatively broad and short; second phalanx of third digit longer than first phalanx (fig. 6); forearm averages relatively short; calcar keeled; interfemoral membrane with 12 to 13 transverse ribs and attached to tip of last caudal vertebra. 1In the type of mezicanus the ribs fade out indeterminently near the posterior border, leaving this area of membrane clear; in the type of phyllotis the ribs apparently end about 3 mm. from the posterior border, at which point they break into a multiplicity of wrinkles which extend to the border; in USNM 302900, from Arizona, the ribs definitely extend to the posterior border of the auricle. 130 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Plecotus phyllotis G. M. Allen Plecotus auritus J. A. Allen, 1881, p. 184. Corynorhinus phyllotis G. M. Alien, 1916, p. 352. Idionycteris mexicanus Anthony, 1923,? p. 1. Plecotus phyllotis Dalquest, 1953, p. 63. Tdionycteris phyllotis Handley, 1956, p. 53. Hototyre: MCZ 5943; adult female, skin and skull; collected 24 March 1878 by Edward Palmer; San Luis Potosi, [probably near the city of San Luis Potosi or near Rio Verde (J. A. Allen, 1881, p- 193)], Mexico. DistripuTion: Known only from San Luis Potosi, Tamaulipas, and Arizona (fig. 12). Further collecting may show this species to have a geographic range similar to that of Plecotus (Corynorhinus) mexicanus (fig. 15). Description: As in subgeneric description. Adult coloration: Mass effect of upperparts between Warm Buff and Cinnamon-Buff; hair bases Bone Brown, sharply distinguished from hair tips; a conspicuous cottony tuft of whitish hairs surrounds the posterior base of each auricle. Tips of hair of underparts between Pale Ochraceous-Buff and Light Buff, sharply distinguished from the Bone Brown to Fuscous-Black hair bases. Face covered with short hairs; anterior external border of auricle with many long, curly hairs; hairs long, lax, and dense on remainder of body. Size large for genus; tragus appearing shorter than in other species of Plecotus and almost as broad as in Plecotus auritus. MBASUREMENTS: See tables 7, 13. Remarks: Until Cockrum’s capture of a specimen in southeastern Arizona in 1955 (Cockrum, 1956b, p. 546), this species had been known only by two Mexican specimens which had served individually as types for Corynorhinus phyllotis G. M. Allen and IJdionycteris mexicanus Anthony. ‘These names have been shown to be synony- mous (Handley, 1956, p. 53). The two Mexican specimens are almost identical. Compared with them, the example from Arizona is larger, its tragus is more broadly rounded (more blunt) distally, and the bat is more pallid throughout. Dorsally its fur is more buffy, less yellowish brown, and its ears and membranes are more grayish, less brownish. These differences may represent geographic variation, but it hardly seems worthwhile to apply a new subspecific name until additional specimens, now available, are studied. Hasirat: Very little is known of the natural history of this species. The Arizona specimen was taken at 1:00 a.m. on 30 May 1955 in a mist net stretched across an artificial swimming pool on the lawn of 2 Holotype: AMNH 62260; adult female, skin and skull; collected 17 June 1922 by W. W. Brown; Miqui- hauna [= Miquihuana?], Tamaulipas; collector’s No. 2. This locality is on the eastern flank of the Sierra Madre Oriental, at about 5,000 feet elevation, near the upper edge of the Lower Austral Zone (Goldman, 1951, p. 263). AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 131 Figure 12.—Distribution of Plecotus phyllotis G. M. Allen. Solid symbols, specimens examined; encircled solid symbol, type locality. the Southwestern Research Station of the American Museum of Natural History (Cockrum, 1956b, p. 546). This is a riparian com- munity in a region where the oak-juniper association dominates. Subsequently, additional specimens of P. phyllotis have been netted in the same area, but data on them have not been published. SPECIMENS EXAMINED: Three, from the following localities: MEXICO: San Luis Porosf: 1s (MCZ). Tamavurpas: Miquihauna [= Miquihuana?], ls (AMNB). UNITED STATES: Arizona: Cochise County: Southwestern Research Station, 5 miles west-southw est of Portal, 5,400 feet, ls (USNM). 132 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VoL. 110 Subgenus Plecotus E. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire Vespertilio Linnaeus, 1758, p. 32. (Part.) Macrotus Leach, 1816, p. 5. (Nomen nudum.) Plecotus E. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 1818, pp. 112, 118. Plecautus F. Cuvier, 1829, p. 415. Tyre Spseciss: Vespertilio auritus Linnaeus. DistrirpuTion: Temperate parts of Eurasia and northern Africa. Norway, Great Britain, Ireland, Portugal, and Canary Islands east to Kamchatka, and Japan; north to Kola Peninsula, lat. 60-62°N. in Siberia, Sakhalin, and Kamchatka; south to Canary Islands, French Morocco, Tunisia, Sudan, Israel, northern Iran, northern Pakistan, Nepal, Sinkiang, Szechwan, Hopeh, Korea, and Japan (fig. 13). Altitudinal range, sea level to 10,500 feet. Description: Supraorbital region Sigel ridged (fig. 4); tem- poral ridges coalesce to form a sagittal crest; rostrum narrow com- ae with other subgenera of Plecotus, arched, and without mid- dorsal concavity; brain case relatively narrow and shallow; zygoma relatively thick and strong in appearance, with postorbital expansion in middle third of arch; median postpalatal process a poorly devel- oped spine; basial pits absent; auditory bulla circular in outline. I! with accessory cusp (fig. 2); P! relatively large, considerably exceeding cingulum of canine in height; P* longer than wide; space between posterointernal edge of P* and anterior edge of M? almost equals lingual length of P*; third commissure of M® equal to or shorter than second commissure; metacone of M? not prominent (reduced to Ril ty sell Ficure 13.—Distribution of Plecotus auritus Linnaeus. Solid symbols, type localities. 1, P. a. auritus Linnaeus; 2, P. a. teneriffae Barrett-Hamilton; 3, P. a. meridionalis Martino; 4, P. a. christiet Gray; 5, P. a. mordax Thomas; 6, P. a. wardi Thomas; 7, P. a. puck Barrett-Hamilton; 8, P. a. homochrous Hodgson; 9, P. a. kozlovi Bobrinskii; 10, P. a. ariel Thomas; 11, P. a. sacrimontis G. M. Allen. AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 133 vanishing point in some specimens) ; P; much larger than P;; P, double- rooted, almost as long in anteroposterior diameter at the cingulum as the tooth is high. Glandular masses on muzzle slightly enlarged (fig. 7); nostril with slightly reduced cornu and with posterior elongation (fig. 8); auricle with anterior basal lobe complete and projected noticeably beyond anterior edge of auricle (fig. 9); accessory anterior basal lobe small and not projected beyond edge of auricle; transverse ribs on auricle extend without interruption to posterior border of auricle; tragus relatively broad and long; second phalanx of third digit equal to or shorter than first phalanx (fig. 6); forearm averages relatively short; calcar not keeled; interfemoral membrane attached to base of last caudal vertebra. MEASUREMENTS: See tables 7, 13. Remarks: According to Ellerman and Morrison-Scott (1951, p. 181), the subgenus includes only one species, P. auritus. They list 11 geographic races (fig. 13). Literature on the natural history of Plecotus auritus is extensive. The following data were gleaned from English sources, mostly from Alcock and Moffat (1901), Barrett-Hamilton (1910-1911), Matthews (1952), and Millais (1904). For reference to the excellent studies in Germany, see Hisentraut (1937). Hasirat: Plecotus auritus is distinctly arboreal, characteristically hunting in the foliage of large trees. Ash trees seem to be particularly favored, but oaks and other deciduous species also may be frequented. However, it is not unusual to see P. auritus hawking around the upper shoots of hedgerows and willows, and sometimes it descends to forage among the lower shrubs and flowers in gardens. Rarely it hunts low over meadows, and has been observed to alight on cow dung to devour the insects attracted there. P. auritus commonly hangs up by day in the summertime in old boathouses, cowsheds, church attics, and similar places; behind window shutters and under eaves of old houses; in tree holes; and even on trunks of trees, sheltered only by the roughness of the bark. This species may utilize separate sites as daytime sleeping places and night-time dining-halls or lounges. Barns and outbuildings are favored for the latter, but tree-trunks are also used. Accumulations of insect remains in such places betray the nightly visits of the bats. Winter roosts are principally in caves, where crevices as well as open chambers may be utilized. Attics of old houses and occasionally hollow trees are also used. Brnavior: In some parts of its range, as in Britain, P. auritus may be one of the commonest and most widely distributed bats, yet its habits render it less conspicuous,than many of the others. It is 134 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 nocturnal and not crepuscular, beginning to forage 30 to 40 minutes after sunset. Then it moves in such a delicate, mothlike fashion in and out of foliage that it is not easily detected. It has been suggested that to see this species the observer should station himself at dusk under a tree whose foliage is not too dense to be seen through (e.g., an ash) and watch closely for the bats to appear among the branches overhead. Close attention is necessary, for the movements of the long-ear may be so stealthy that the presence of even five or six individuals hunting simultaneously in a single tree may be overlooked. Furthermore, the observer should choose fine weather for his vigil inasmuch as P. auritus seems to be much affected by atmospheric conditions. Undoubtedly this species catches some flying insects, but much of its prey is picked from foliage. It hovers somewhat like a humming- bird to pick insects from leaves or flowers, or it plunges into the middle of a spray and remains for several seconds clinging to the twigs. It has been observed climbing among branches, on tree trunks, and on walls, presumably in search of food. Flight from tree to tree or roost takes a special form. When the destination is near at hand the bat darts through the air with a swift, direct flight. When the destination is more distant, the bat makes a plunging descent to within a few inches of the ground and makes off in a jerking zig-zag fashion. So sudden and irregular are its move- ments that its course is difficult to follow. In direct flight the ears appear to be held erect, but when the bat threads its way among foliage in search of insects they are thrown forward so as to resemble a “proboscis” or are curled downward and forward so as to suggest “‘cheek pouches.’ In sleep the ears are bent backwards until they le close along the body, partially covered by the wings, or they are curled down and forward almost like the horns of a ram. In the former position the tragus always points forward, in the latter it may be reflexed. The ears may be folded or unfurled slowly, or snapped up suddenly. The action of the two ears can be synchronized or independent. P. quritus alights in an upright position, clinging first to an object with its thumbs. It soon reverses its position and hangs head down- ward. In climbing or walking, the limbs are moved alternately, the head bobs to and fro, and the bat advances in a curious jerky fashion but with surprising speed. Preparing to fly, the bat raises its head, pricks forward its ears, and looks about with a seemingly intelligent air. When forced to do so, P. auritus swims rather well. The long-ear has a variety of call notes. The commonest are a high-pitched chirping squeak used in ordinary communication and in AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 135 quarrels, and a shrill, long-drawn, querulous, childlike note uttered when the bat is disturbed or surprised. There are also buzzing sounds, and a short, melodious, trilling, birdlike sound used for communication, both in flight and at rest. Moffat (1922, p. 107) observed mating both before and after hibernation. The single young is born in June or July. Females commonly form nursery colonies of up to 50 or 100 or more indi- viduals during spring and summer. Large winter aggregations are infrequent. Solitary hibernating individuals are often found. The long-ear is ordinarily rather quarrelsome in disposition, attacking and biting bats of other species that venture too near its roosting spot. It has been observed to attack and drive away the pipistrelle from its feeding area. Occasionally mixed colonies of P. auritus and Pipistrellus pipistrellus and various species of Myotis have been encountered. Ryberg (1947, p. 71) tested the homing ability of the long-ear. Two of nine banded individuals returned 32 miles from the point of release to their home territory. P. auritus is easily maintained in captivity. It tames quickly, eats readily, and remains in good health for some time. It is clean in its habits, grooming itself carefully after feeding. It seems more intelligent than other bats and is playful, alert, and lively, even in daytime. Flower (1931, p. 161) recorded the survival of a P. auritus in captivity for 1 year, 2 months, and 2 days. The maximum recorded ages of banded, wild individuals are 5 years, 4 months (Ryberg, 1947, p. 78) and 5 years, 6 months (Verschuren, 1956, p. 5). Parasirss: Stiles and Nolan (1931, p. 713) listed 27 genera of parasites known to have infested P. auritus. Foop: The long-eared bat is primarily a moth-eater. Gould (1955, p. 400) reported Lepidoptera of 22 species in its diet. These varied in wing spread from 30 to 67 millimeters (average 45). Re- mains of several species of Coleoptera and Diptera have been found in its droppings. In captivity it seems to prefer mealworms, but will also accept flies and raw meat. HisperNATION: In the British Isles the hibernating season for P. auritus extends from about the middle of October to early April. This species is a light sleeper, and if disturbed will generally wake, chatter, and attempt to bite if touched. It sometimes emerges in winter from its hibernating quarters when the weather is mild, and it commonly shifts during the winter from spot to spot within its place of hibernation without venturing out into the open. 136 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Subgenus Corynorhinus H. Allen Vespertilio Rafinesque, 1818, p. 446. (Part.) Plecotus Lesson, 1827, p. 96. (Part.) Synotus Wagner, 1855, p. 720. (Part.) Corynorhinus H. Allen, 1865, p. 173. Corynorhynchus Peters, 1865, p. 524. (Nomen nudum.) Corinorhinus Dobson, 1875, p. 348. Tyrer species: Plecotus macrotis LeConte. DisrRinuTIoN: Temperate North America in Lower Austral and Lower Sonoran to Canadian life zones from Virginia, Ohio, Illinois, Kansas, South Dakota, Idaho, and British Columbia south to the Gulf of California and the Gulf of Mexico and through the Mexican Highlands to the Isthmus of Tehuantepec (fig. 27). Description: Supraorbital region smoothly rounded or faintly ridged (fig. 4); temporal ridges remain apart or coalesce to form a sagittal crest; rostrum broad compared with other subgenera of Plecotus, flattened, and with slight middorsal concavity; brain case relatively narrow and deep; zygoma relatively thin and fragile in appearance, with postorbital expansion in posterior third of arch; median postpalatal process a prominent spine; basial pits prominent; auditory bulla circular in outline. I! with or without accessory cusp (fig. 2); P! small, barely exceeding cingulum of canine in height; P* wider than long; space between posterointernal edge of P* and anterior edge of M! only about one- third lingual length of P*; third commissure of M? equal to or longer than second commissure; metacone of M? fairly prominent; P, only slightly larger than P3; Py single-rooted, much shorter in antero- posterior diameter at the cingulum than the tooth is high. Glandular masses resembling thumbless mittens, rise from sides of muzzle (fig. 7); nostril without cornu and with posterior elongation (fig. 8); auricle with anterior basal lobe reduced to a small lap of membrane near tragus (fig. 9); accessory anterior basal lobe absent; transverse ribs on auricle interrupted by vertical rib near posterior border of auricle; tragus relatively narrow and long; second phalanx of third digit longer than first phalanx (fig. 6); forearm averages relatively long; calcar not keeled; interfemoral membrane attached to tip of last caudal vertebra. Key to species of the subgenus Corynorhinus 1. M3 with 4th commissure almost as long as 8rd (Pleistocene species). P. tetralophodon (p. 140) M3 with 4th commissure barely indicated or absent. . .......-. 2 2. Supraorbital region faintly ridged, those ridges continuous with the temporal ridges, which do not coalesce to form a sagittal crest (Pleistocene species). P. alleganiensis (p. 137) AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 137 Supraorbital region not ridged; extension of temporal ridges into the inter- orbital region variable; temporal ridges normally coalesce to form a sagittal crest (Recent species) . a Ua) wae Renee A 3 3. Tips of ventral hairs ne or whitish, Sreeoly contrasted with blackish beeea median postpalatal process triangular in shape, with a broad base; rostrum weak and much depressed; I! with prominent secondary cusp; anterointernal cusp of cingulum of P4 usually present (Southeastern United States). P. rafinesquii (p. 151) Tips of ventral hairs brownish or buff, often not sharply contrasted with slate, gray, or brownish bases; median postpalatal process usually styliform, with a narrow base (occasionally triangular); rostrum strong and not depressed (east of Great Plains and in Pacific Northwest), or variable; I! with or without secondary cusp; anterointernal cusp of cingulum of P4 absent (east of Great Plains), or variable ........ Ye Oke 4 4. Coloration of dorsum dark sooty-brown, with scant contrast ipetwean bases and tips of hairs; greatest length of skull usually less than 15.7 mm. (9) or 15.5 mm. (co); maxillary tooth row usually less than 4.9 mm.; I! usually with secondary cusp; tragus usually less than 13 mm. long; interfemoral cross-ribs usually less than 9 (Mexico). . . . . P. mexicanus (p. 141) Coloration of dorsum (in Mexico) yellow-brown, with sharp contrast between bases and tips of hairs; greatest length of skull usually more than 15.7 mm. (9), or 15.5 mm. (co); maxillary tooth row usually more than 4.9 mm.; I! usually simple; tragus usually more than 13 mm. long; interfemoral cross- ribs usually more than 9 (Appalachians, Ozarks, western United States, southwestern Canada, Mexico)... .. . . . P. townsendii (p. 165) PLEISTOCENE SPECIES Plecotus alleganiensis Gidley and Gazin Corynorhinus alleganiensis Gidley and Gazin, 1933, p. 345. Hoxtotypr: USNM (Vert. Paleont.) 12412; skull with incomplete dentition and lacking auditory bullae, zygomatic arches, and man- dibles; collected 1912-1915, by J. W. Gidley; Cumberland Cave, Allegany County, Md. DistriBuTIon: Known only from the Pleistocene fauna of Cumber- land Cave, Md. (fig. 14). Description: Skull similar in size and proportions to those of the Recent species P. rafinesquii and P. townsendii, but brain case possibly shallower and wider; supraorbital region slightly ridged; temporal ridges strongly marked, continuous with supraorbital ridges, and converging posteriorly, but not coalescing to form a sagittal crest; dorsal profile of rostrum almost straight; upper dentition (P'—M® known) appears to be identical to that of Recent material; lower dentition (Ii—M; known) similar to that of Recent species, but teeth average slightly more robust. MeaAsuREMENTS: Holotype, in millimeters: Greatest length, 15.9+ ; interorbital breadth, 3.9; brain case breadth, 8.5; brain case depth, 5.5; maxillary tooth row, 4.9+; postpalatal length, 5.9+; palatal breadth, 5.9. 138 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Ficure 14.—Type localities of the Pleistocene species: 1, Plecotus alleganiensis Gidley and Gazin; 2, Plecotus tetralophodon Handley. Comparisons: When Gidley and Gazin described Plecotus al- leganiensis from the Pleistocene deposits of Cumberland Cave, Md., they had little comparative material of Recent species from nearby areas. I have compared the type and other cranial fragments of Plecotus alleganiensis with the now abundant material of P. townsendi from West Virginia and of P. rafinesquii from the southeastern United States. While some of the characters ascribed to P. al- leganiensis by Gidley and Gazin are not as distinctive as they supposed, still there are sufficient differences to warrant separation of P. al- leganiensis from P. townsendii and P. rafinesquii. The faint supraorbital ridges and the prominent, independent, temporal ridges distinguish P. alleganiensis from the Recent species. In both specimens of P. alleganiensis that have the middorsal portion of the skull intact, the supraorbital and temporal ridges are continu- ous, and the temporal ridges converge posteriorly to within about 0.75 mm. of each other, but do not merge to form a sagittal crest. In Recent species of the subgenus Corynorhinus the temporal ridges sometimes extend into the interorbital region, but there is no supra- orbital ridge. A sagittal crest usually is present in Recent species (exceptions noted are a specimen of P. mexicanus (KU 29911) from AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 139 Mexico and specimens of P. townsendii (AMNH 142023, USNM 297710) from West Virginia; in these the temporal ridges are contigu- ous but not coalesced). The presence of supraorbital ridges is interpreted as a primitive characteristic. They are present in Huderma maculatum, Plecotus auritus, and P. phyllotis. They are absent in P. mezxicanus, P. rafinesquii, and P. townsendii. Separate temporal ridges, also con- sidered to be a primitive characteristic, are observed in Huderma macu- latum and in Plecotus phyllotis; they unite to a common crest in the other Recent species of the genus Plecotus. Other cranial characters relate P. alleganiensis closely to the Recent species P. rafinesquit and P. townsendiv. The rostrum is relatively broad and flattened; the anterior nares are enlarged; the rostral profile is almost straight (normally, though not invariably, concave in P. townsendii virginianus, and normally almost straight in P. rafinesquii). The palate and basicranium are similar to those of Recent species of the subgenus Corynorhinus; basial pits are prominent. General proportions of the skull of P. alleganiensis are the same as in P. t. virginianus; the brain case may be a trifle shallower. Depth of the brain case is difficult to assess in the only specimen in which it is intact, however, for the posterior part of the skull has been compressed (the occipital condyles are in the plane of the basioccipital- basisphenoid plate, the foramen magnum is in almost the same plane, and the supraoccipital, rather than being almost vertical to the main axis of the skull, has its lower margin tilted forward about 30°). The upper dentitions of Recent P. ¢. virginianus and fossil P. alleganiensis are indistinguishable. None of the 27 mandibular frag- ments of P. alleganiensis is complete, but all parts of the lower jaw are represented. Differences between the mandibles of P. alleganien- sis, P. townsendii, and P. rafinesquii are slight. The masseteric (coronoid) fossa is usually deeper and better defined in the fossil, and the mandibular foramen lies more posteriorly and lower, nearer the base of the angular process; the canine averages larger in diameter at the cingulum; P,; averages slightly larger; and the molars average slightly broader—in essence, the dentition of P. alleganiensis is slightly more robust. P. alleganiensis differs markedly from the other Pleistocene species, P. tetralophodon, in having the skull apparently broader, the supra- orbital region ridged, the temporal ridges farther apart, and the fourth commissure of M® barely indicated. Rewationsuips: P. alleganiensis shares many morphological fea- tures with the two Recent species of the genus that now inhabit the eastern United States. It could have been directly ancestral to either or both of these species. Relationship of P. alleganiensis to the 140 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VoL. 110 Mexican Pleistocene®species, P. tetralophodon, appears to be more remote. SPECIMENS EXAMINED: Four cranial fragments and 27 fragments of mandibles from Cumberland Cave, Md. Plecotus tetralophodon Handley Corynorhinus tetralophodon Handley, 1955b, p. 48. Hotorype: CIT (Vert. Paleont.) 192/2989; well preserved skull with worn teeth (lacking mandibles, auditory bullae, hamular proc- esses, all incisors, right canine, and the minute premolar, P', from each maxilla); collected by Chester Stock in Pleistocene deposits of San Josecito Cave, near the town of Aramberri, southern Nuevo Leén, Mexico, elevation 7,400 feet. DistRipuTION: Known only from the Pleistocene fauna of San Josecito Cave, Nuevo Leén, Mexico (fig. 14). Description: Similar to Recent species of the subgenus Coryno- rhinus in most cranial details. Anterior nares relatively small and rounded in outline (dorsal view) ; brain case relatively shallow; supra- orbital ridges lacking; temporal ridges prominent and converging posteriorly, so that they meet but do not completely merge; inter- maxillary notch relatively small; extension of palate posterior to M? relatively short; median postpalatal process styliform; basial pits deep and well defined. Tooth rows crowded; teeth relatively fragile (not robust); canine with small internal cingular cusp; anterointernal cingular cusp of P* only slightly indicated; M*® with well developed fourth commissure, almost equaling third commissure in length. MEASUREMENTS: Holotype, in millimeters: Greatest length, 15.6; zygomatic breadth, 8.2; interorbital breadth, 3.4; brain case breadth, 7.7; brain case depth, 5.3; maxillary tooth row, 5.0; postpalatal length, 5.9; palatal breadth, 5.7. Comparisons: A well developed fourth commissure of M? distin- guishes P. tetralophodon from related species. This commissure is barely indicated in other New World species of Plecotus and in Euderma maculatum; there is no trace of it in the Old World Plecotus auritus, in which even the third commissure of M? is reduced. The degree of shallowness in the cranium of P. tetralophodon (brain case depth equals 34 percent of greatest length) is rarely equaled in Recent specimens of the subgenus Corynorhinus. It is observed in less degree in Huderma maculatum, Plecotus auritus, P. phyllotis, and possibly in P. alleganiensis. Absence of a sagittal crest is a character shared with Huderma maculatum, Plecotus alleganiensis, and P. phyllotis. The temporal ridges usually are even farther apart in those forms, however. A few specimens of P. mexicanus and P. townsendii resemble P. tetralophodon in this respect. AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 141 Rerationsuirs: Plecotus mexicanus and P. townsendri now inhabit the region where the fossil P. tetralophodon was found. P. tetralopho- don must have been closely related to these species, for the general conformity of the skull is similar in all three; probably all came from a common stock. I do not believe that P. tetralophodon is directly ancestral to either of these Recent species, however. It is less like P. rafinesquii and P. alleganiensis. SPECIMEN EXAMINED: The holotype. RECENT SPECIES Plecotus mexicanus G. M. Allen Corynorhinus macrotis pallescens Miller, 1897, p. 52. (Part.) Corynorhinus megalotis mexicanus G. M. Allen, 1916, p. 347. Corynorhinus rafinesquii mexicanus Miller, 1924, p. 83. (Part.) Plecotus rafinesquii mexicanus Dalquest, 1953, p. 64. (Part.) Corynorhinus mexicanus Handley, 1955c, p. 148. Ho.totypr: USNM (Biol. Surv. Coll.) 98285; adult female, skin and skull; collected 25 August 1899, by E. W. Nelson and E. A. Gold- man; near Pacheco [Sierra de Brefia, 8,000 feet], Chihuahua, Mexico; collector’s No. 13955. Distrisution: The higher and more humid parts of the Sierra Madre Occidental, the transverse volcanic belt of central Mexico, and the Sierra Madre Oriental (fig. 15). North to El Tigre Moun- tains, Sonora; near Pacheco, Chihuahua; and 22 miles south-southeast of Monterrey, Nuevo Leén. South to Pétzcuaro, Michoacén; Monte Rio Frfo, 28 miles east-southeast of Ciudad México; and Jico, Vera- cruz. Zonal Distribution: Mostly Transition and Upper Austral. Altitudinal range from 4,800 feet to 10,500 feet; usually above 6,000 feet. Description: Adult coloration: Tips of hairs of upperparts vary from Verona Brown to Fuscous, bases from Bone Brown to Fuscous- Black; degree of differentiation between tips and bases of hairs slight; burnishing of hair tips absent or only slightly evident in most speci- mens; hairs at posterior base of auricle paler than remainder of dor- sum. Bases of hairs of underparts vary from Benzo Brown to Fuscous, tips are about Pale Pinkish Cinnamon. Immature coloration: Dor- sum smoky brown, similar to coloration of some adults. Size small for subgenus; lobes of presternum slightly expanded; forearm averages relatively long; brain case averages relatively wide and deep, sloping up abruptly above the short, depressed rostrum; anterior nares, viewed from above, usually relatively small and angu- lar in posterior outline; median postpalatal process varies from styli- form to triangular; auditory bulla averages relatively small. First uppers incisor usually with’ a® prominent accessory cusp and always 142 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 { i] 1 i ‘ 1 i 1 AS | s Se 1 I Bae 1 pag eA Taian be a a ee ~ _ ' SN seine Px: Wes. Eee || lah! Ne 7°) ES} ‘ g ar S =a \ o— ie: — \ ~~ \ Ss erate) \ wore =a ~ 5 NS = “Sal ~ = si \ + yh Ae ———— / \ \ : Xe oe Figure 15.—Distribution of Plecotus mexicanus G. M. Allen. Solid symbols, specimens examined; open symbols, other records; encircled solid symbol, type locality. with at least a trace of such a cusp; upper canine somewhat reduced in size; P* usually with a small anterointernal cingular cusp. Tragus (possibly also auricle) averages relatively short; cross-ribs on inter- femoral membrane average eight. MEASUREMENTS: See tables 8, 14. Comparisons: Compared with Plecotus townsendii australis and P. t. pallescens, P. mexicanus is darker, with less contrast between bases and tips of dorsal hairs; usually fewer cross-ribs on the inter- femoral membrane; smaller tragus on the average; smaller skull; AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 143 deeper brain case; shorter, weaker, and more depressed rostrum; smaller auditory bullae; actually and relatively shorter maxillary tooth row; and more consistently bilobed first upper incisor. There is at least an indication of an accessory cusp on I’ in all specimens of P. mexicanus that I have examined; few specimens of P. t. australis or P. t. pallescens have even a trace of it. Retationsures: There is a strong resemblance between P. mezxi- canus and P. rafinesquii. Similarities include short, weak, depressed rostrum; deep brain case; bilobate first upper incisor; and possession of a small anterointernal cingular cusp on P*. P. mexicanus differs from P. townsendit in somewhat the same man- ner as does P. rafinesquit. This parallel may not be purely coinci- dental. Perhaps both P. merxicanus and P. rafinesquii were isolated from a common stock (of which P. townsendii is the Recent descendant) at about the same time. However, P. mericanus is not differentiated from P. townsendii quite as well as is P. rafinesquit. This may indi- cate more complete or longer isolation for P. rafinesquii, or partially parallel evolution between P. mezxicanus and P. townsendii. In coloration P. mexicanus resembles typical P. t. townsendii of the Pacific Northwest. Apparently this parallel can be traced to similar environmental stimulae. P. ¢. townsendii inhabits cool, humid, coastal lowlands, and P. mexicanus inhabits cool, relatively drier highlands. Remarks: Since 1890 it has been known that bats of the subgenus Corynorhinus inhabit Mexico. The first specimen was referred by J. A. Allen (1890) to Plecotus townsendii, then thought to be mono- typic. Miller (1897) referred all Mexican specimens to a new race, P. macrotis pallescens, restricting the name townsendii to populations in the Pacific Northwest. Later, G. M. Allen (1916) referred all Mexican material to a new race, P. megalotis mexicanus, restricting pallescens to the relatively arid portions of the western United States. Subsequent authors, with the exception of Burt (1938) for bats of northern Sonora, have applied the name P. rafinesquit mexicanus to all Mexican populations of the subgenus Corynorhinus. Present evi- dence, however, indicates that there are in Mexico two species to which the names P. townsendii and P. mezicanus apply. Evidence that these are distinct species has been overlooked, although examples of each have been in museum collections for more than 60 years. Reasons for this oversight are several: 1. Populations of P. townsendii just north of the range of P. mexicanus in Arizona converge toward P. mexicanus in size and in coloration, giving an illusion of geographic intergradation between the two species. 2. The two species are not strikingly different, although they are more distinct than some species in other genera of bats, such as of Myotis. 497256—59_4 144 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 INTERFEMORAL CROSS—RIBS (NUMBER OF) P. MEXICANUS SPECIMENS !N SAMPLE: TI LESS THAN 9 RIBS IN 7T6% FREQUENCY PLT, AUSTRALIS SPECIMENS IN SAMPLE: 26 MORE THAN 9 RIBS IN 88% MAXILLARY TOOTH ROW (LENGTH OF) P, MEXICANUS SPECIMENS IN SAMPLE: 70 LESS THAN 4.9MM. IN B6% > o Zz w > So w i ve P.T. AUSTRALIS SPECIMENS IN SAMPLE: 23 MORE THAN 4.9MM. IN 91% ZYGOMATIC BREADTH P. MEXIGANUS SPECIMENS IN SAMPLE: 65 LESS THAN 8.5MM. IN 95% FREQUENCY P. T. AUSTRALIS SPECIMENS IN SAMPLE: 20 MORE THAN 8.5MM. IN 70% GREATEST LENGTH OF SKULL P. MEXICANUS SPECIMENS IN SAMPLE: 68 LESS THAN 15.7 MM. IN 94% FREQUENCY P.T. AUSTRALIS SPECIMENS IN SAMPLE: 21 MORE THAN 15.7MM. IN 95% Ficure 16.—Comparison of frequency of occurrence of certain measurements in adult female P. mexicanus (solid symbols) and P. #. australis (open symbols), including all measurable individuals studied. 497256 O - 59 (Face p, 144) MONTANA S|) OKLAHOMA VIRGINIA KANSAS WEST VIRGINIA NORTHERN) a WASHINGTON CENTRAL |END, OREGON ARIZONA KAS ARKANSAS | 25 lz0 16.5 16.0 155 15.0 MALE tet OD LY See MACE 8 — NUMBER OF SPECIMENS ee IN SAMPLE OBSERVED RANGE OBSERVED MEAN 2 STANDARD ERRORS O EITHER SIDE OF MEA! 2 STANDARD DEVIATION ON EITHER SIDE OF ME LEGEND FIGURE 17.—Gllecotus mexicanus ic. TANA i MON’ pote is Nas pre Lia uenco HIDALGO DURANGO OKLAHOMA VIRGINIA RORTHERN ANU COAHUILA KANSAS — WEST VIRGINIA ne ZACATECAS OAXACA NUEVO LEON WASHINGTON CENTRAL PACHEGO. , SAN LUIS BIG BEND, OREGON ARIZONA CHIHUAHUA JALISCO CHARCAS VERACRUZ Potosi phy ; ARKANSAS N+to O ‘ ’ 15.5 15.0 —---- FEMALE 8 — NUMBER OF SPECIMENS 14.5 IN SAMPLE OBSERVED RANGE OBSERVED MEAN 2 STANDARD ERRORS ON EITHER SIDE OF MEAN 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS ON EITHER SIDE OF MEAN LEGEND 497256 © = 59 (Face p, 144) Ficure 17.—Greatest length (in mm.) of skulls of specimens of Plecotus townsendii (upper set of figures) and Plecotus mexicanus (lower set of figures), arranged in geographic sequence from northwest to south, thence to northeast. i i, whostoa ATHAS 44) Ria Ra Aves AMARSHTL a (on SATALLAV BLED elm COMME CAZSACS DADSTAIAS: VO CE ay Sit |, GOHNOSE Big be ADBAHOWE RACRGDS | JAL > RUM AUHEHO Se anoning — - ; : aWOITAIVaG “—- ctl sue aaHTIS ~~ ?«. ' a sAzcossaqe loetlede Geofeerarins) idagnad) ie tr 0A 4 | spon aidqargorghmickogoana:{ertugit-todsensiol) A | | ! ae) i ae aay 1 i “a 7 ; H yA s — is \ } 7 iD : he, A AD A ' AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 145 3. No other two species of the subgenus were known to be sympatric. 4, Relatively few specimens have been available for study. Until recently, both species were represented only in the U.S. National Museum. The Texas Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit has had an example of each species since 1942; the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, has had both since 1946 (skins and skulls of P. townsendii; P. mexicanus in alcohol); and the Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas, has had both since 1948. 5. With the exception of the type series of P. mexicanus (preserved as dry skins and skulls), all early collections of Mexican big-eared bats in the National Museum were preserved in alcohol, and in a random selection of specimens for removal of skulls, only P. mexicanus happened to be chosen. The presence of P. town- sendit, thus, was not detected. When Mexican material was assembled from several museums for this study, variation was found to be slight in some series, great in others. The entire sample segregated into two groups (figs. 16, 17), each of which included both sexes and various ages. The amount of variation far exceeded that observed in samples from other parts of the range of the subgenus Corynorhinus (fig. 17). With one exception, all specimens could be referred without hesitation to one group or the other on the basis of a dozen diagnostic characters. Each speci- men had most of the characters of its group, i.e., any specimen with dark coloration also had small tragi and few cross-ribs on the inter- femoral membrane, etc. (fig. 16). The two forms have distinct although broadly overlapping geo- graphic ranges (fig. 18). The range of P. mexicanus—the cooler, moister, higher elevations of the Sierra Madre Occidental, the transverse volcanic belt of central Mexico, and the Sierra Madre Oriental (Goldman and Moore, 1946)—is strikingly similar to the ranges of the dark colored races of the harvest mouse, Reithrodon- tomys megalotis, outlined by Hooper (1952, p. 51) and to that of the white-footed mouse, Peromyscus difficilis (Osgood, 1909, p. 179). The range of the other form, P. townsendiz, is in part complementary. It inhabits the lower elevations of the arid plateau and desert ranges of north-central Mexico north of the transverse volcanic belt, and the arid valleys of Jalisco, Morelos, and Oaxaca south of the trans- verse volcanic belt. In addition, it occurs together with P. mexicanus in the southern extremity of the Sierra Madre Occidental (Sierra de Valparaiso, 8,200 feet) and in the transverse volcanic belt. (Santa Rosa, 9,500 feet, Convento de Acolman, and Lago Texcoco, 7,500 feet. However, it should be noted that the latter localities are rela- tively arid, despite their high elevation (Davis, 1944, p. 371; Gold- man, 1951, p. 146). This pattern of distribution might exist without intergradation between the two forms if they were: (1) Subspecies with seasonal migrations; (2) ecologically isolated subspecies; or (3) distinct, partially sympatric, species. 146 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 0}, ae ————— CI %, tee es e fo “J = pbssiogresess: “Len Ficure 18.—Sympatry of Plecotus mexicanus (triangular symbols) and Plecotus townsendit (circular symbols) in Mexico. Seasonal movement is not apparent in available samples (table 5). P. mexicanus is found in northern and southern parts of its range in both winter and summer. P. townsendii has been taken at high eleva- tions in the transverse volcanic belt (in the range of P. meaicanus) in both summer and winter, has been found south of the belt in spring, late summer, and fall, and north of the belt at all seasons. The theory of conspecificity becomes less tenable when seasonal movement of one or the other of the subspecies cannot be demon- strated. The phenomenon of overlapping ends of a chain of sub- AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 147 Tas.E 5.—Seasonal distribution of P. mexicanus and P. townsendii in Mexico, as determined from specimens for which collection date is known P. mexicanus North of transverse volcanic belt In transverse volcanic belt February: Mojarachic January: Las Vigas February: Monterrey June: “Morelos” August: El Tigre Mts. July: Jico August: Pacheco July: Monte Rfo Frio December: Sierra de Valparaiso July: PAtzcuaro November: Santa Rosa November: Zacualpilla P. townsendiz North of transverse volcanic belt In or south of transverse volcanic belt January: Yoitepec April: San Andrés February: San Juan July: Convento de Acolman April: Gen. Cepeda August: Oaxaca April: Sta. Helena September: Guadalajara June: San Buenaventura September: Cuernavaca July: Zimapan November: Charcas September: Bella Unién November: Santa Rosa October: Presa de Guadalupe November: Bledos November: Muralla December: Sierra de Valparaiso species, reacting to one another as species rather than as related subspecies, however, occurs with some frequency in mammals, al- though it is more conspicuous in birds. It might apply in this instance if it could be proved that both P. mexicanus and the Mexican popula- tions of P. townsendii (P. t. australis) intergrade to the northward with other populations of P. townsendii (P. t. pallescens). Then it could be assumed that the extremely arid environment of eastern Chihuahua and western Coahuila, where big-eared bats are not known to occur, has served as a barrier, sufficiently isolating related popula- tions to the east and west of it so that they reacted to each other as species when both segments invaded areas to the south of the deserts. Mexican populations of P. townsendii intergrade northward with other populations of P. townsendii. The zone of intergradation is broad, extending from northern Coahuila, through the Texas Pan- 148 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VoL. 110 handle. There is no evidence in existing samples of intergradation between mezicanus and townsendii. The geographic ranges of the two forms overlap in northern Sonora; a sample from El Tigre Mountains contains typical individuals of both forms, and Burt (1938, p. 26) may have had both species in material from Sfric. It is true that populations of P. townsendii become smaller in body size and darker in color toward the Mexican border, but there is no accompanying increase in the frequency of the accessory cusp of I’, reduction in the number of interfemoral cross-ribs, reduction in contrast between bases and tips of dorsal hairs, disproportionate decrease in the size of the auditory bullae, the auricles and tragi, or the average length of the maxillary tooth row, increase in the average depth of the brain case, or depression of the rostrum. In other words, populations of P. townsendii, neighbor- ing P. mexicanus on the north, show a convergence of some morpholog- ical characters toward P. mexicanus, perhaps in response to similar environmental stimulae. Lack of convergence in other characters, however, indicates a different genetic structure in the two forms. Dice (1940) used a concept of ecological subspecies to explain the discontinuous distribution of dark-colored subspecies on isolated mountain peaks surrounded by lowlands inhabitied by pale-colored subspecies. Dice supposed that the several isolated dark-colored populations might have originated in situ as independent derivations from the pale-colored stock, presumably in response to similar environ- mental conditions. According to this hypothesis, some subspecies may be ecological units, rather than units of similar heredity. Were it not for the mixed samples (Sierra de Valparaiso and Santa Rosa) and absence of intergradation between the two forms, the concept of ecological subspecies could be an adequate explanation for the distribution of the Mexican bats of the subgenus Corynorhinus. It could be assumed that the alternative forms developed wherever certain ecological conditions prevailed. Under this hypothesis, inde- pendent development of the ‘‘mexicanus’’-type might be expected wherever relatively cool, moist conditions of environment occur, and the ‘“australis’”-type would be expected under conditions of greater warmth and aridity. The distribution of both forms then would be largely independent of geography and would be related primarily to ecology. The mixed samples could be accounted for as chance min- gling of the two forms during the nonbreeding season as a consequence of the interfingering of humid and arid environments. Existing samples appear to be too numerous and too well distributed, however, to have failed to show evidence of intergradation, if such exists. It thus appears that the hypothesis of conspecificity is In no wise applicable to the Mexican populations of the subgenus Corynorhinus. AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 149 Provided that the data from available samples have not been misinter- preted, the two forms in consequence must be considered distinct but partially sympatric species. A few specimens—such as KU 44759 from near Hacienda La Mari- posa, Coahuila, which has the coloration, size, large auricle, and shal- low brain case of P. townsendiz, but the short tooth row, short tragus, and few interfemoral cross-ribs of P. mexicanus—may be hybrids. In view of the probable close relationship between the two species, it is surprising that such specimens appear to be so infrequent. Geographic variation in cranial characters in P. mericanus seems insignificant; even individual variation in these characters is of small magnitude. Geographic and individual variation in color is slight. The average mass effect of the dorsum in the fine series from Las Vigas is smoky, blackish brown, with the hair tips so dark as to be hardly distinguishable from the dark hair bases. The dark extreme appears almost black to the casual glance, while the pale extreme is brownish, with sooty tones less pronounced, and with the hair tips slightly paler than the hair bases. Specimens from the northwestern extremity of the range of the species are somewhat paler than those from the south- east; dark extremes are similar in the two regions. The fur is usually rather short and woolly, but specimens from 10,500 feet in Estado de México (TCWC 2823), 8,200 feet in Zaca- tecas (USNM 91931), and west-central Chihuahua (USNM 265660) have long, laxfur. This does not appear to be a seasonal phenomenon, for short-haired individuals have been taken in January, February, August, November, and December. The long-haired specimens were taken in February, July, and December. These differences in pelage are not obviously related to age or sex. Hasirat: Apparently this species is partial to forested mountainous regions, where it roosts in caves, mine tunnels, and_ buildings. Warmer, less humid, and more desert-like districts in the same general area are inhabited by P. townsendii. P. mexicanus has been reported in the following habitats: Summer: Flying about rain pool in opening in pine-fir forest on Monte Rio Frio (Davis, 1944, p. 380); in ranch house on lower border of oak forest (5,500 feet) above Jico (E. W. Nelson, field notes); hanging from roof of small, damp, north-facing grotto in vicinity of mixed forest of pine, oak, and madrojio near Pdtzcuaro (E. W. Nelson, field notes; Goldman, 1951, p. 195). Winter: In old mine near Santa Rosa, near summit of Sierra de Guanajuato, upper slopes of which are characterized by light rainfall and second-growth forest of oak, alder, madrofio, Crataegus, and wild cherry (E. A. Goldman, field notes; Goldman, 1951, p. 146). Hibernating at 8,200 feet in Sierra de Valparafso in cold, damp cavern through which strong currents of air passed from one entrance to another; upper slopes of sierra forested with pine, juniper, cypress, oak, mad- rofio, and manzanita, frequently interrupted by wet, grassy meadows (E. A. Gold- 150 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM von. 110 man, field notes; Goldman, 1951, p. 290). In shallow cave in region of oak and pine near Mojarachic (Knobloch, 1942, p. 297). Benavior: Information on behavior is scant. E. W. Nelson (field notes) remarked of a Patzcuaro specimen that: When first taken in hand its long ears were bent spirally back and downward close against the sides of the head exactly like a pair of little recurved horns. While examining the animal with surprised curiosity these horns suddenly ex- tended and became a pair of huge upright ears. While examining these ears at first I noted a fine regular waviness to the inner margin of the coiled ear which disappeared when the ear was extended. The field notes of HE. A. Goldman tell of a group of big-eared bats found in the Sierra de Valparaiso in December, 1897: IT found eight specimens of this species hibernating in a cave at 8,200 feet altitude. Six of them in formalin were unfortunately lost along with my tank by my hunter while descending to the town of Valparaiso. They were hanging as usual by their feet, from the roof of the cave and at considerable distances from each other—6 to 10 or 12 feet. Their eyes were closed and their bodies cold and stiff. Their wings were hanging very close to the sides of their bodies. Their long ears had the margins rolled inwards and they were curled over backward and downward somewhat like the horns of a sheep and were pressed close to the sides of the head. When first taken from the cave the only signs of life that I noticed in them was a very slight moving of the feet, and they would hook them to my finger. I tied them all up together in a [handkerchief?] and carried them to camp. Their blood soon began to circulate, their bodies became warm and they revived sufficiently to be able to chatter and bite at each other and my fingers. Six hours after they were taken from the cave they could craw] about but although uninjured none of them were able to fly or at least made no effort to do so. The cave was cold and damp and a strong current of air passed in at one entrance and out at another. Foop: Not known. Mieration: Like other species of Plecotus, P. mexicanus is not known to make extensive migrations (see table 5 and p. 146). Hisernation: According to Goldman’s 1897 field notes (above), this species may become very lethargic under certain conditions. Repropuction: Dalquest noted on specimen labels that no embryos were found among a large group of females collected at Las Vigas in January. Adult males (10) and adult females (53) were together in this colony. Adults of both sexes (3 males, 10 females) likewise were found together at Santa Rosa in November. A group of nine females, accompanied by five immatures, almost fully grown, but with finger joints not completely ossified, were collected near Pacheco on 25 August. Solitary immature individuals of slightly younger age were found on 14 July at Jico and at P&tzcuaro. Mott: Two of nine adult females collected near Pacheco on 25 August were beginning to molt on chest and shoulders (new hairs still short and prostrate). Two of five immatures collected with this group were beginning to molt on the belly. AMERICAN BATS—-HANDLEY 151 SPECIMENS EXAMINED: A total of 104 from the following localities in Mexico: Cuinvanua: Near Pacheco [Sierra de Brefia, 8,000 feet], 14s (USNM); Moja- rachic [= Mafuarachic?], Rayon District, ls (USNM). Guanasuato: Santa Rosa [9,500 feet], 18a (USNM). Mé£xico: Monte Rio Frio, 10,500 feet, 28 miles east- southeast of Ciudad México, ls (TCWC). MicnHoacikn: 2 miles north of Patz- cuaro, 7,100 feet, 1a (USNM). Moretos: No exact locality, la (USNM). NurEvo LE6n: 22 miles south-southeast of Monterrey, 4as (MCZ). Sonora: Santa Marfa Mine, El Tigre Mts., la (UMMZ). VeEracruz: Jico [5,500 feet], la (USNM); 2.5 miles east of Las Vigas, 8,500 feet, 59bs (KU), 4s (GF); 6 miles west-southwest of Zacualpilla, 6,500 feet, 3s (KU). Zacatrcas: Sierra de Val- parafso [13 miles west of Valparaiso, 8,200 feet], ls (USNM). ADDITIONAL RECORDS: The following records from Mexico probably refer to this form: PurBLa: Hacienda de Miguel Sesma, 2 miles northwest of Esperanza (Schwartz, 1954, in litt.). Sonora: Sdric (Burt, 1938, p. 26). Plecotus rafinesquii Lesson Synonymy is given under the subspecies. DistRIBUTION: Southeastern United States (fig. 19). Description: Adult coloration: Hairs of upperparts blackish at base and yellowish brown to reddish brown distally, the two areas sharply demarked; hairs at posterior bases of ears usually not different from those of remainder of dorsum. Mass effect darkens with wear. Hairs of chest and belly black or blackish at base, white or whitish at tip, the division between the two colors sharp; hairs of chin and throat like remainder of underparts or with buffy wash encroaching from sides of neck; hairs bordering membranes whitish throughout. Immature like adult, except much darker throughout, the Avellaneous tips of the dorsal hairs and the whitish tips of the ventral hairs failing to conceal the blackish hair bases. Size medium for the subgenus; presternum with all lobes, but espe- cially the ventral lobe (almost as wide at tip as lateral lobe), somewhat expanded. Rostrum weak and much depressed, rendering facial profile relatively straight; anterior nares relatively small, and posterior border with somewhat angular shape; intermaxillary notch of palate relatively narrow posteriorly; median postpalatal process triangular in shape, with broad base; brain case averages relatively deep for subgenus. I’ with prominent secondary cusp; P* normally has small anterointernal cingular cusp. Comparisons: Plecotus rafinesquii may be distinguished from geo- graphically contiguous races of Plecotus townsendii by numerous char- acters. When all populations of P. townsendii are considered, however, the separation is not so striking. Apparently, only coloration will distinguish all the individuals of the two species, all populations considered. P. rafinesquii always has the bases of the ventral hairs 152 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Ficure 19.—Distribution of Plecotus rafinesquii Lesson: 1, P. r. macrotis; 2, P. r. rafines- quit. Solid symbols, specimens examined; open symbols, other records; encircled solid symbols, type localities. Cross-hatching indicates known areas of intergradation between subspecies. black or blackish and the tips white or whitish, with the two colors sharply contrasted, whereas P. townsendii, on the other hand, always has the bases of the ventral hairs slate, gray, or brownish and the tips brown or buff, with the two colors often not sharply contrasted. A secondary cusp on the inner upper incisor is present in all speci- mens of P. rafinesquii. It is absent (or represented only by a slight shoulder) in all specimens of the geographically adjacent P. t. virgini- anus. It is absent in most but not all examples of the geographically more remote P. t. australis, P. t. pallescens, and P. t. townsendii. It is usually present in geographically adjoining P. t. ingens. The secondary cusp is present in all specimens of P. mezicanus. In P. rafinesquii there is usually, though not always, a small antero- internal cingular cusp on P*. This cusp was not observed in specimens of P. t. ingens or P. t. virginianus, but is usually present in P. t. town- AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 153 sendii and P. mexicanus and sometimes occurs in P. ¢. australis and P. t. pallescens. The median postpalatal process is triangular in shape, with a broad base, in P. rafinesquit. It is normally narrower at the base and more styliform in P. townsendii. In some examples of P. ¢. australis and P. mexicanus the process is almost needle-like. The broad-based form is encountered in some individuals of all races of P. townsendii, however. The intermaxillary notch of the palate is narrower posteriorly in P. rafinesquii than in most individuals of P. townsendit. Likewise, the anterior nares are relatively small in P. rafinesquii and have the posterior border angular in outline. Geographically adjacent races of P. townsendii have the nares larger and the posterior border rounded in outline. The nares in the more remote P. t. townsend and P. t. australis are generally large and rounded, but in P. mezicanus and P.t. pallescens they are relatively small and angular as in P. rofinesquit. Another characteristic of P. rafinesqui that is geographically vari- able in P. townsendu is the appearance of the rostrum. In P. rafine- squirt the rostrum is typically weak and much depressed. On the other hand, adjacent races of P. townsendii, P. t. ingens and P. t. virginianus, as well as P. t. townsendvi, have the rostrum strong and not depressed. The rostrum usually is not so weak or depressed in P. t. australis and P. t. pallescens as in P. rafinesqun. P. mexicanus, showing these characters in the extreme, is similar to P. rafinesquit. Skeletons are not available for all of the races of either species, but it appears that the presternum may have taxonomic worth. In speci- mens examined, all lobes, but particularly the ventral lobe, were more expanded in P. rafinesquv thanin P. townsendi (fig. 5). The presternum of P. mexicanus is intermediate between these extremes. RELATIONSHIPS: Plecotus rafinesquv is the most primitive living member of the subgenus Corynorhinus. It is similar in many respects P. mexicanus (see p. 143). It is more distinct from geographically contiguous races of P. townsendw (ingens and virginianus) than it is from some of the geographically more remote races (pallescens and townsendit) of that species. This indicates a considerable period of isolation for P. rafinesquii and a subsequent extension of range to bring the more progressive P. townsendit into geographical contact with P. rafinesquii. Isolation for P. rafinesquii is further confirmed by the fact that primitive traits (e.g., secondary cusp on I', anterointernal cingular cusp on P*, triangular shape of median postpalatal process, small anterior nares and intermaxillary notch) which are constant or nearly so in P. rafinesquii are normally variable in P. townsendit. The coloration of P. rafinesquii, the only character separating all individuals of the Recent species of the subgenus Corynorhinus, most 154 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 resembles the coloration of the more primitive subgenera [dionycteris and Plecotus. Remarks: Referring to a visit to the “lower parts of the Ohio, the Wabash, Green River, Barrens, Prairies, and the States of Indiana, Illinois, etc.,’’ Rafinesque (1818, p. 446) described nine species of bats, ten mice and shrews, and a number of snakes and fish. Four of the nine species of bats and a number of the mice and shrews cannot be related to species known to occur in the lower Ohio Valley. The de- scription of one of the bats, Vespertilio megalotis, suggests what we now know as Plecotus: “‘Vespertuio megalotis. R. (Big-eared bat.) Tail three-eighths of total length, body dark gray above, pale gray beneath, ears very large, duplicated, auricles nearly as long. Length 4 inches, breadth 12 inches.”’ Most of Rafinesque’s contemporaries thought his V. megalotis was related to Eurasian Plecotus. Lesson (1827, p. 96) paraphrased Rafinesque’s description of V. megalotis and renamed it Plecotus rafinesquii. He stated that it was ‘perhaps only a variety of our long-eared bat [European Plecotus].”’ After a brief period of use, V. megalotis and P. rafinesquii fell into obscurity, and Plecotus macrotis of LeConte (1831, p. 431) came into universal usage as the name for the big-eared bat of the eastern United States. A. H. Howell’s (1909, p. 68) collection of a second species of big- eared bat at Burkes Garden in the Allegheny Mountains of Virginia in 1908 led to G. M. Allen’s resurrection of the name V. megalotis. In his revision of the genus (now subgenus) Corynorhinus, Allen (1916, p. 339) wrote: The discovery of a Corynorhinus (szc) distinct from C. macrotis, from extreme western Virginia, westward, in the eastern United States was wholly unexpected. It is the eastern representative of the desert-colored pallescens of west-central United States, from which it chiefly differs in its somewhat darker, more drab, coloration. On the basis of specimens from Virginia, Kansas, and Colorado, Allen supposed that this Plecotus, distinct from P. macrotis, had a range continuous across the Ohio and upper Mississippi valleys from Virginia to Kansas and Colorado. His Kansas and Colorado specimens were somewhat paler than those from Virginia, indicating, Allen thought, intergradation with the western pallescens. He presumed that specimens from Kentucky and Indiana, recorded in literature as P. macrotis, had been misidentified, and were actually representatives of the newly discovered second species. With the range that he envisioned for the second species, Allen’s choice of Rafinesque’s old name, Vespertilio megalotis (type locality, lower Ohio River), as the name for it was a logical step. In the absence of material from the AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 155 type region, Allen considered specimens from Burkes Garden, Va., to be typical. That Vesperiilio megalotis Rafinesque is a junior homonym of Vesper- tilio megalotis Bechstein (1800, p. 622) escaped Allen’s notice. Bech- stein’s V. megalotis is based on Le Vaillant’s (1796, p. 279) description of a bat that came into his tent while he was one or two day’s journey north of the Orange River in Great Namaqualand, South-West Africa (about lat. 28° S.). There is little doubt that Bechstein’s Vespertilo megalotis is a member of the megadermatid genus Lavia. The descrip- tion, except for the measurements, is an accurate one for that genus. No specimen of this family has been reported subsequently south of lat. 15° S: Thomas (1916, p. 127) pointed out the unavailability of the name V. megalotis for an American bat and proposed the substitution of P. rafinesquir Lesson in its place. Subsequently the two eastern American species of Plecotus have been known as P. macrotis (South- eastern States) and P. rafinesquu (North-Central States). Collections of Plecotus from north of the Ohio River have never been critically examined (e.g., Lyon, 1936, p. 86). Numerous specimens of big-eared bats are now available from the type region of Lesson’s P. rafinesquii: the Ohio Valley and upper Mississippi Valley States of Tennessee, Kentucky, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, and West Virginia. All of those specimens are the “‘C. macrotis’’ of G. M. Allen. Big-eared bats from a small portion of the Appala- ehian Highlands in western Virginia, eastern West Virginia, and east- ern Kentucky are the “C. rafinesquii” of G. M. Allen. Likewise, specimens from the Ozark Highlands of northwestern Arkansas, and from the gypsum cave area of south-central Kansas, Oklahoma, and northern Texas are the “C. rafinesquit’”’ of G. M. Allen. Instead of having a continuous distribution from Virginia to Kansas as Allen supposed, his “C. rafinesquii”’ apparently is isolated in the central Appalachians, and reappears again to the westward only in the Ozark Highlands and beyond. Further, Lesson’s description of P. rafinesquii, ‘“Pelage dark gray above, and pale gray below ... .” comes closer to the yellowish brown above, grayish white below of Allen’s ‘“C. macrotis’ than it does to Allen’s “C. rafinesquit”’ which is reddish brown above, buffy below. In this connection, Neill’s observation (1953, p. 383) on the appearance of a live example of P. macrotis is pertinent: In life, the dorsal hairs were dark, grayish-black with light, horn-colored tips. These light tips were very inconspicuous, however, and to casual inspection the upper surfaces were grayish-black. The ventral hairs were dark gray with whitish tips which were more evident posteriorly. 156 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 My own observations of living specimens of the mid-Appalachian big- eared bat (‘‘C. rafinesquiz”’ of G. M. Allen) show it to be as brown in appearance when living as when made up as a study skin. It could not be described as “‘dark gray above’”’ under any circumstances. Thus, as first pointed out by G. M. Allen (1916, p. 339), there are two species of Plecotus in the eastern United States. Current applica- tion of names and delineation of geographic distributions for the two species are incorrect, however. One species inhabits the southeastern and central United States. The names P. rafinesquii Lesson (=V. megalotis Rafinesque) (type locality, “Lower Ohio Valley’) and P. macrotis LeConte (type locality, ‘“Georgia’”’) are available for it. The earlier name is P. rafinesquii Lesson. The second species inhabits the central Appalachian Highlands, the Ozark Highlands, and the western United States, southwestern Canada, and Mexico. The earliest name for this species is P. townsendii Cooper (type locality, “Columbia River’) (Handley, 1955c, p. 147). Although the geographic ranges of P. rafinesquii and P. townsendii overlap in the Appalachian Highlands and are at least contiguous in the Ozark Highlands, the two forms have never been taken at the same locality. Frum (1948, p. 418) secured specimens of typical P. rafinesquti near the region inhabited by P. townsendzi in West Virginia. Barbour (1957, p. 141) collected typical P. townsendii within the range of P. rafinesquii in Powell County, Ky. Welter and Sollberger (1939, p. 79) reported P. townsendii from nearby Rowan County, Ky. How- ever, this identification is questionable since no specimen was pre- served (Barbour, 1957, p. 141). Typical P. rafinesquii (MCZ 6062) has been collected on the Osage River in Arkansas. This locality cannot be pinpointed but may be within the range of P. townsendit. A skeleton (KU 5645) of P. rafinesquii from Crawford County, Ark. (Black, 1936, p. 30), was secured near collecting stations of P. town- sendii, but at a lower elevation, in the Lower Austral zone. P. rafinesquii is polytypic. One geographic race inhabits the At- lantic and Gulf Coast regions, the other the area west of the Appala- chians and north of Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana. lLesson’s name P. rafinesquii can be used for the interior race, and LeConte’s P. macrotis for the coastal race. Hasirat: Plecotus rafinesquit occurs in a forested region largely devoid of natural caves. It has been observed most frequently in buildings. Natural roosting places are hollow trees, crevices behind loose bark, and similar arboreal retreats. Lowery (1943, p. 224) found it in hollow trees (as well as in buildings) in Louisiana; a specimen in the U.S. National Museum was collected in a hollow cypress in the Dismal Swamp of Virginia; and Harper (1927, p. 280) was told of one that had been found under dry leaves in a cypress swamp in Georgia. AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 157 In some regions where natural caves occur, P. rafinesquit has been found in buildings but not in caves, despite diligent search. Thus, the only specimen from Florida Caverns State Park was taken in a building (Sherman, 1945, p. 201). Hibbard (1954, in litt.) found the species only in the attic of an old house at Mammoth Cave, Ky. Where P. rafinesquiz occurs with some frequency in caves, it usually has been found in small caves, or near the entrances of larger caverns. P. M. Smith (1954, in litt.) found an individual 25 feet from the entrance of a small cave in Indiana and another 50 feet from the en- trance of a small limestone cave in Ohio. Ganier (1954, in litt.) found numerous individuals 30 to 100 feet from the entrance of a small cave on a wooded mountainside, 400 feet above a valley floor in Tennessee. Hahn (1908, p. 145) observed this species in Indiana only in dim light near cave entrances and believed (1909, p. 619) that it is not truly a cave dweller. However, all records from the northern fringe of the range of this species are from caves or subterranean excavations and, it should be noted, all are for the cooler months of the year (October to May), indicating, possibly, a choice of some other roosting place during the warmer months. P. rafinesquir also inhabits other cave substitutes. Neill (1953, p. 282) reported one that was found clinging to the wall of an artificial limestone grotto, built for ornamental purposes and overgrown with ferns and mosses so as to resemble natural limestone caverns which are numerous around Silver Springs, Fla. Moore (1949a, p. 60) recorded finding big-eared bats on two occasions in a concrete culvert (66X75 feet) at the bottom of a ravine, some 40 feet deep, which probably had water running through it the year around (Florida). Goodpaster and Hoffmeister (1952, p. 365) found big-eared bats on several occasions in western Tennessee in an open cistern, 20 feet deep, built in the shape of a bottle, with open top about 2% feet in diameter extending about 3 feet above the ground, and containing about an inch of water at the bottom. In warm weather the bats hung near the top; in cold weather near the bottom. Harper (1927, p. 280) noted that a Plecotus had been found in a turpentine still in the Okefenokee Swamp. P. rafinesquii roosts both in occupied and abandoned buildings. In the Great Smoky Mountains, Stupka (1954, in litt.) found this species to be a regular inhabitant of a house that had been abandoned for about 15 years. Two or three rooms and the attic were utilized by the bats. He reported others that had been found in a schoolhouse (in summer) and in a Civilian Conservation Corps camp building. In the same region, the Komareks (1938, p. 148) found Plecotus in the attic of an abandoned schoolhouse and on the chimney, above the hearth, in an occupied cabin. Barbour (1957, p. 141) located a 158 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 colony in the attic and storerooms of a large log building in a recreation camp. In North Carolina, Brimley (1945(?), p. [10]) reported it in an “old house,” and Odum (1949, p. 188) had a specimen from an occupied dwelling. Some South Carolina specimens have come from a barn (Schwartz, 1954, in litt.) and from a closet in an occupied dwelling (ChM specimen labels). Harper (1927, pp. 279-281) recorded that residents of the Okefenokee Swamp had observed Plecotus most frequently in buildings—on several occasions during services in a meeting-house, in occupied dwelling houses (on wall near ceiling, and on chimney), in a shanty, in a commissary, and beneath the flooring of a railway telephone booth. In Florida big-eared bats have been discovered in the headquarters building of an Indian reservation (E. V. Komarek, 1954, in litt.) and in the base- ment of an occupied dwelling in an urban area (Moore, 1949b, p. 50). Alabama records cite the ceiling of a small round gatehouse and the garret of an old abandoned grist mill (A. H. Howell, 1921, p. 28). In Louisiana, Vernon Bailey (field notes) found it in the attic of a large plantation house, and Louisiana State University specimen labels record it from occupied farm houses. Beruavior: P. rafinesqui seems to be rather unsociable. Solitary individuals are more commonly encountered than clusters of indi- viduals. Summer colonies have been recorded as follows: 5 gravid females, Houma, La., 12 May (Vernon Bailey, field notes); 20 or 25 (3 collected were gravid females) in small cave in Warren County, Tenn., 31 May (Ganier, 1954, in litt.); breeding colony (females and young) in Breathitt County, Ky., 14 June (Barbour, 1957, p. 141); 3 females and 1 small young collected near Baton Rouge, La., 17 June (LSU specimen labels). Five of unspecified sex were taken at Taylorsville, N.C., on 25 August (Brimley, 1945(?), p. [10]); and a group of seven, of both sexes, were collected at Cades Cove, Tenn., on 15 July (Stupka, 1954, in litt.). Winter aggregations (usually consisting of both sexes) are more numerous, but even at this season solitary individuals are frequently encountered. Stupka (1954, in litt.) collected 11 in a house near Gatlinburg, Tenn., on 17 November, but the bats were scattered in two or three rooms and the attic; seven were collected in Georgetown County, S.C., on 18 December (ChM specimen labels); Ganier (1954, in litt.) has reported small groups in caves of Warren County, Tenn., on 19 March and in early September; and in western Tennessee Goodpaster and Hoffmeister (1952, p. 365) found several big-eared bats hanging in a clump in an open cistern on 2 September (15 were collected) and on 13 March found numerous Plecotus in the same cistern, hanging individually and in two or three small clumps (25 specimens taken). | | | AMERICAN BATS—-HANDLEY 159 Many references to P. rafinesqui specify that no other species of bats were found in the same building or cave. Stupka (1954, in litt.) mentioned that the abandoned house near Gatlinburg, Tenn., in which he found big-eared bats for several years, was shared with wood rats (Neotoma). Pipistreilus was found on four occasions and Plecotus twice in a Florida culvert, but not on the same dates (Moore, 1949a, p. 60). The sleeping P. rafinesquiti hangs head downward with its ears curved backward and flattened against the sides of its neck. In this position the anterior edge of the ear is uppermost and forms a, half ellipse. The posterior portion of the ear folds along its transverse ribs like an accordion. When the bat wakes the ears are usually straightened slowly (Hahn, 1909, p. 619). Residents of the Okefenokee Swamp told Harper (1927, p. 280) of a peculiar motion of the ears of these bats. One was discovered on the wall of a commissary when it attracted attention by “‘waving”’ its ears. Another that was seen several times in a railway telephone booth “wagged”’ its ears alternately. Several other informants also mentioned ‘‘ear-wagging.”’ P. rafinesquw must be strictly nocturnal, for it has never been observed in twilight flight. Hahn, (1908, p. 177) experimented with the ability of bats to avoid obstacles. His subjects were mostly Myotis and Pipistrellus but included one Plecotus rafinesqui. The big-eared bat struck vertical wires 52 out of 102 chances, while in contrast Myotis and Pipistrellus struck on 24 to 25 percent of the chances and Eptesicus on 67 percent. In these experiments there may have been a relationship between wingspread of bat and success of avoidance. Hahn noted that the flight of captive Plecotus was swift and steady and that both Myotis and Plecotus in attempting to escape from a captivity room repeatedly flew against window panes and screens with great force. Several references to P. rafinesquii indicate a variable agility in avoiding capture. One that began flying about during a service (17 July) in the meeting-house on Billy’s Island in the Okefenokee Swamp was caught by hand by a member of the congregation (Harper, 1927, p. 280). Goodpaster and Hoffmeister (1952, p. 365) found (25 May) a Plecotus hanging in the upper part of a cistern that had an opening at the top 2 feet in diameter. When disturbed the bat first flew to the bottom of the cistern and there circled until forced to attempt to _ escape through the top. It was then captured by hand. Hahn (1909, | | | | | | if p. 619) saw two of these bats on 22 February in a cave at Mitchell, Ind. They avoided capture and flew out of the cave into the cold winter air. A solitary individual in a mine tunnel in Illinois (5 Octo- 497256—59 5 160 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 ber) avoided three persons and escaped out of the tunnel (Elder, 1946, p. 434). An immature that Hamilton (1930, p. 308) found injured on a Kentucky roadway may have struck a vehicle. On the authority of a local informant Harper (1927, p. 280) reported the voice of P. rafinesqua as a “‘fizzling noise.” Foop: The food habits of Plecotus rafinesquii appear to be un- recorded. Specimens that Hahn (1909, p. 619) kept in captivity refused food and soon died. Mieration: There is no evidence of migration by this species. It has been found at all seasons throughout its range except in the ex- treme northern part, where it has been discovered only in winter (October to May). Hisernation: Whether Plecotus rafinesquit becomes lethargic in the winter in all parts of its range is not certain. At least under some circumstances it does truly hibernate. Goodpaster and Hoffmeister (1952, p. 365) found (13 March) big-eared bats hibernating near the bottom of an open cistern. ‘The bats were cold and sluggish and made no attempt to escape when placed ina cage. A February observation in the Okefenokee Swamp reported by Harper (1927, p. 280) suggests injury or hibernation. On the other hand, specimens found in No- vember in a culvert near Satsuma, Fla., had to be captured with a net (Moore, 1949a, p. 60). One that Elder (1946, p. 433) found in a mine in southern Illinois on 5 October was very alert and escaped out of the mine when it was approached. Two that Hahn (1909, p. 619) saw on 22 February in a Mitchell, Ind., cave escaped capture and flew out into the cold air. Repropuction: The season of mating and length of gestation are not known in this species. ‘The young usually are born in late May or early June, shed their milk dentition by mid-July, and reach full size and assume the adult pelage in August or early September. With regard to a female captured near Satsuma, Fla., on 5 Novem- ber, Moore (1949a, p. 60) reported that her ‘“‘vulva was perforate, reddish, and swollen. Her teats were dry and her uterus was empty.” Schwartz noted on specimen labels that testes were prominent in all males captured near Andrews, N.C., on 19 and 20 January. Good- paster and Hoffmeister (1952, p. 365) observed that bats taken in hibernation in Obion County, Tenn., on 13 March began mating after warm surroundings had overcome their lethargy. Vernon Bailey (field notes) collected females containing single well-developed embryos in the attic of a large plantation house near Houma, La., on 12 May. On 31 May, in a Tennessee cave, Ganier (1954, in litt.) found females with pregnancy so advanced that birth of the one young of each seemed imminent. Barbour (1957, p. 141) AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 161 reported a nursery colony in Kentucky in which the young averaged 66 mm. in total length on 22 June. A specimen (LSU 1846) with milk teeth still in place, M? and M? not fully erupted, no trace of postjuvenile molt, and total length of 71 mm., was collected near Baton Rouge, La., on 17 June. AMNH 70517 with some milk teeth still in place, M?® not fully erupted, no trace of postjuvenile molt, and total length of 84 mm. was collected near Quicksand, Ky., on 8 July. LSU i397, collected on 28 June in Nachitoches Parish, La., has mature dentition, no trace of post- juvenile molt, and total length of 88 mm. Individuals almost full- grown (total length 93, 98, 99, and 100 mm.), and molting to a post- juvenile pelage, have been collected in South Carolina and Alabama on 24 July, 17 August, and 22 August. However, UI 853, collected on 2 September in Tennessee, although almost full-grown (total length 101 mm.), shows no trace of the postjuvenile molt. Mott: Molt is evident on the head, neck, and underparts, but not on the back of ChM 33.188.3 (24 July); on head, neck, underparts, and rump of ChM 33.218.3 (17 August); on neck and upper back, and almost completed on the belly of ChM 33.218.2 (17 August); and on all parts of the body of USNM 180198 (22 August). Molting in adults has been noted only in two specimens, both of which show molt on all parts of the body: USNM 201714, male, Alabama, 4 July; and ChM 33.218.4, female, South Carolina, 17 August. Plecotus rafinesquii macrotis LeConte Plec{otus] macrotis LeConte, 1831, p. 431. Plecotus lecontit Cooper, 1837, p. 72, pl. 3, fig.5. (Substitute name for macrotis.) Vesp[ertilio] macrotis Lesson, 1842, p. 23. (Not Vespertilio macrotis Temminck, 1840, p. 218=Pipistrellus imbricatus Horsfield.) S[ynotus] Lecontit Wagner, 1855, p. 720. Synotus macrotis H. Allen, 1864, p. 63. (Not Synotus macrotis Wagner, 1855, p. 719=Pipistrellus imbricatus Horsfield.) Clorynorhinus] macrotis H. Allen, 1865, p. 174. Corynorhinus rafinesquit Handley, 1955c, p. 147. Hototyrer: None designated. Type locality subsequently fixed (Miller, 1897, p. 51) near the LeConte plantation, 5 miles south of Riceboro, Liberty County, Ga., (see p. 162.) _ Disrrisution: Southeastern United States (fig. 19). Northeast- ward to Dismal Swamp, Va. Southwestward to Terrebonne, West - Baton Rouge, and Natchitoches Parishes, La.; and McCurtain and LeFlore Counties, Okla. Inland to Dismal Swamp, Va.; Bertie and Wayne Counties, N. C.; Darlington County, S. C.; Autauga and Green Counties, Ala.; Kemper County, Miss., and Crawford County, Ark. Zonal distribution, Lower Austral. Altitudinal distribution, sea level to about 500 feet. 162 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Description: As for the species. In adults, hairs of upper parts blackish basally; tips between Sayal Brown and Snuff Brown. Hairs of underparts blackish basally, with a slight reddish tinge; tips whitish with a yellowish buff cast. MEASUREMENTS: See tables 9, 15. Comparisons: Compared with P. r. rafinesquii, P. r. macrotis has coloration darker, more brownish dorsally; mass effect of the under parts less clear white, more yellowish; and mesopterygoid fossa and postdentary part of palate averaging narrower. Remarks: Body size averages small in populations in southern Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana (tables 9, 15). Specimens from other parts of the range of P. r. macrotis (Atlantic coast and Arkansas, Oklahoma, and northern Louisiana average larger in body size, and resemble P. r. rafinesquit in this respect. There is no corresponding variation in coloration. Morphologically large and morphologically small populations of P. r. macrotis are similarly colored and are equally distinct from P. r. rafinesquit. Intergradation between P. r. macrotis and P. r. rafinesquit is shown in numerous specimens. Some from Sevier County, N.C., dorsally are like typical P. 7. rafinesquit, but some show traces of the yellowish ventral coloration characteristic of P. r. macrotis. Individuals from Marshall and Weaverville, N.C., and Huntsville, Ala., are more per- fectly intermediate in all details of coloration, but are nearer P. r. rafinesquit. A specimen from Leighton, Ala., approaches Gulf Coast populations of P. 7. macrotis in size, but is like P. r. rafinesquit in colora- tion. Specimens from central and northern Louisiana are unac- countably variable in coloration but average nearer P. r. macrotis. Characters of P. 7. macrotis apparently are most accentuated in coastal plain populations. Those of P. r. rafinesquii are found west of the Appalachians, from Tennessee northward. Although there is no assurance that the specimens upon which LeConte based his description of Plecotus macrotis came from his plantation near Riceboro, it is reasonably certain that they came from Georgia. The original description stated the range simply as the “United States,” but in a later note on macrotis, LeConte (1855, p. 437) specified that it “inhabits Georgia.” There are two LeConte specimens of Plecotus in the U.S. National Museum, perhaps the very specimens upon which the description of macrotis was based. Both — are skulls only, labeled simply “United States.”” Both could very well have come from the same coastal locality, possibly from the Le- _ Conte Plantation. Since coastal Georgia is an area probably typical of the coastal race of P. rafinesquii, and lacking evidence that Le- Conte’s description was based on specimens from elsewhere, I follow Miller (1897, p. 51) in designating the vicinity of the LeConte Planta- | AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 163 tion, 5 miles south of Riceboro, Liberty County, Ga., as the type locality of P. r. macrotis. SPECIMENS EXAMINED: A total of 56 from the following U.S. local- ities: Vireinia: Nansemond County or Norfolk County: Lake Drummond, Dismal Swamp, 1ls(USNM). Sours Carourna: Charleston County: Hampton Plantation, Santee, 4s (ChM). Darlington County: Society Hill, 28 (USNM). Dorchester County (?): Summerville, 1s (ChM). Georgetown County: Darlington Plantation, 9s (ChM). WNo ezact locality, 23 (USNM). Groratia: Early County: Kesler, la (MCZ). ‘United States’? [=Liberty County: 5 miles south of Riceboro?], 2s (USNM). Fiorina: Hendry County: Big Cypress Seminole Indian Reservation Headquarters, 27 miles east-southeast of Immokalee, 1s (USNM). Marion County: Silver Springs, la (USNM). Atasama: Autauga County: Autaugaville, 2a (USNM). Mississippi: Hancock County: Bay St. Louis, 1a (USNM). West- ville, Is (USNM). Lovistana: East Baton Rouge Parish: Baton Rouge, and 3 miles south of Baton Rouge, 7s (LSU), 1s (USNM). Madison Parish: Tallulah, 2a (USNM); Waverly, 1s (LSU). Natchitoches Parish: Kisatchie, 3s (LSU). Terrebonne Parish: 9 miles southeast of Houma, 3s (USNM). West Baton Rouge Parish: Lobdell, ls (USNM). Arxansas: Crawford County: Mulberry, 1b (KU). Sevier County: Near Horatio, ls (OAM). County uncertain: “Osage River,” la (MCZ). Oxtanoma: McCurtain County: 2.5 miles west of Smithville, 5s; UOMZ). ADDITIONAL RECORDS: The following records probably refer to this form: NortH Carourna: Bertie County: No exact locality (Brimley, 1905, p. 22), Wayne County: Goldsboro (Brimley, 1905, p. 22). SouraH Carouina: Beaufort County: Hardeeville (Miller, 1897, p. 52). Georata: Charlton County: Okefe- nokee Swamp (Harper, 1927, p. 279). Ware County: Okefenokee Swamp (Harper, 1927, p. 280). Fuoripa: Alachua County: Micanopy (H. Allen, 1864, p. 65). Jackson County: Florida Caverns State Park, near Marianna (Sherman, 1945, p. 201). Levy County: Gulf Hammock (Pearson, 1954, p. 474). Orange County: Zellwood (Moore, 1949b, p. 50). Putnam County: 1.6 miles north of Satsuma (Moore, 1949a, p. 60). ALABAMA: Greene County: Eutaw (H. Allen, 1864, p. 65). Hale County: Greensboro (Miller, 1897, p. 52). Mussissrppr: Kemper County: No exact locality (H. Allen, 1864, p. 65). Louisiana: Lincoln Parish: Ruston (Lowery, 1943, p. 224). Orleans Parish: New Orleans (Lowery, 1936, p. 18). Rapides Parish: Alexandria (Dalquest & Werner, 1954, p. 156). OxkLAHOMA: Le Flore County: Houston (Blair, 1939, p. 102). Plecotus rafinesquii rafinesquii Lesson Vespertilio megalotis Rafinesque, 1818, p. 446. (Not Vespertilio megalotis Bechstein, 1800.) Plecotus rafinesquii Lesson, 1827, p. 96. Plecotus macrotis Garman, 1894, p. 58. Corynorhinus macrotis Butler, 1895, p. 86. Corynorhinus rafinesquii Handley, 1955c, p. 147. Houotyren: None designated. Type locality: “. . . lower parts of | the Ohio, the Wabash, Green River, Barrens, Prairies, and the states of Indiana, Illinois, etc.’’ (Rafinesque, 1818, p. 446). Herein restricted to Mount Carmel, Wabash County, Ill. (see p. 164). 164 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM YO. 110 DistrisuTion: East-central United States (fig. 19). North to Nicholas County, W. Va.; Adams County, Ohio; Putnam County, Ind.; Wabash and Alexander Counties, Ill. West to Putnam County, Ind.; Alexander County, Iil.; and Obion County, Tenn. South to Obion County, Tenn.; Colbert and Madison Counties, Ala.; Towns County, Ga.; and Macon, Transylvania, and Alexander Counties, N.C. East to Alexander County, N.C. and Nicholas County, W. Va. Zonal distribution: Upper Austral and lower portions of Transition. Altitudinal distribution: From 400 feet above sea level in western Tennessee to 3,850 feet in western North Carolina. Description: As for the species. In adults, hairs of upperparts blackish basally; tips between Sepia and Buffy Brown. Hairs of underparts black at base, almost pure white at tip. MEASUREMENTS: See tables 9, 15. Comparisons: For comparison with P. r. macrotis, see page 162. Remarks: Rafinesque’s specimens, which led to the description of P. rafinesquii by Lesson, are not known to be still in existence. This material is said to have been secured on the ‘‘. . . lower parts of the Ohio, the Wabash, Green River, Barrens, Prairies, and the states of Indiana, Illinois, ete.” (Rafinesque, 1818, p. 446). The big-eared bat is not known to occur as far north as the Green River, and it has not been taken on the barrens or prairies of Illinois, Indiana, or Kentucky. Neither has it been taken on the banks of the Ohio River, although it undoubtedly occurs there. However, there are specimens in the U.S. National Museum secured in 1896 and 1903 at Mount Carmel on the Wabash River in Illinois, a region specifically mentioned by Rafinesque. In addition, the species is also known to have occurred at other localities in Illinois and Indiana. Conse- quently, I propose that the type locality of Plecctus rafinesquii rafines- quit Lesson be restricted to Mount Carmel, Wabash County, Ill. Plecotus rafinesquit seems to be rare near the northern limits of its range. Despite repeated investigations, the caves and mines of Illinois have produced but two recent records (Elder, 1946, p. 4383; and Smith and Parmalee, 1954, p. 204); Indiana, two (P. M. Smith, 1953, specimen submitted to U.S. Nat. Mus.; and R. E. Mumford, 1954, in litt.); Ohio, one (Goslin, 1954, p. 480); West Virginia, one (Frum, 1948, p. 418); and Kentucky, two (Barbour, 1957, p. 141; and Hibbard, 1954, in litt.). Plecotus may have occurred in Pennsylvania within historic times, but it has not been found there by recent investigators (Mohr, 1954, p. 21). Harrison Alien (1864, p. 64) stated that ‘I am informed by Prof. Baird that specimens of a Synotus, probably of this species [Synotus macrotis], were received some years ago by the Smithsonian Institution, from Meadville, Pa., but that they have become in some AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 165 way misplaced and are not now to be found.” I have checked the early catalogs of the U.S. National Museum and have failed to find any record of big-eared bats from Pennsylvania. In 1857 and again on two occasions in 1861 specimens were received from J. T. Thuckston of Meadville, Pa. These were Condylura, Myotis, Tamiasciurus, Peromyscus, and Microtus. If big-eared bats were received from the same source they apparently were never cataloged. SPECIMENS EXAMINED: A total of 50 from the following U.S. local- ities: NortH Carouina: Buncombe County: Weaverville, 1s (USNM). Cherokee County: 4 miles east-southeast of Andrews, 1s (AS). Madison County: Marshall, ls (MCZ). Swain County: 14 miles northeast of Andrews, 5s (AS); Forney Creek, 2,400 feet, 9 miles northwest of Bryson City, 1s (USNM). Gzorarta: Towns County: Young Harris, ls (USNM). Auasama: Colbert County: Forster’s Mill on Town Creek, 5 miles east of Leighton, ls (USNM). Madison County: Monte Sano, 1,600 feet, southeast of Huntsville, Is (USNM). TENNESSEE: Blount County: Cades Cove, 1,750 feet, 1s (USNM). Campbell County: Well Springs, Powell Valley, ls (OSM). Obion County: 10 miles northeast of Tipton- ville, 6s (UI). Sevier County: Sugarlands area, 1,900 feet, 3 miles south of Gatlinburg, 13ab (USNM). Warren County: McMinnville, 1s (CNMH). Kentucky: Breathitt County: Noble, 5s (UK); Quicksand, Is (AMNH). Inuinois: Alexander County: One-half mile north of Olive Branch, 1s (INHS). Wabash County: Mount Carmel, 2a (USNM). Inprana: Lawrence County: Mitchell, Upper Twin Cave, 1s (UI), ls (USNM). Washington County: Near Salem, ls (OSM). Onto: Adams County: Waggoner Ripple Cave, Green Town- ship, ls (OSM). West Virainita: Nicholas County: Collison Cave, near Mt. Lookout, 1s (CM), 2s (GF). ADDITIONAL RECORDS: The following records probably refer to this form: NortH Carouina: Alexander County: 10 miles northwest of Taylorsville (G. M. Allen, 1916, p. 351). Macon County: Highlands, 3,850 feet (Odum, 1949, p. 188). Transylvania County: Pink Beds, head of South Fork of Mills River, 3,300 feet, Pisgah National Forest (Oberholser, 1905, p. 9). THNNESSEE: Franklin County: “Southeast portion’? (Ganier, 1954, in litt.). Sevier County: Greenbrier Cove (Komarek and Komarek, 1938, p. 148). Warren County: Near Hubbard’s or Bat Cave, 8 miles north of Beersheba Springs (Ganier, 1954, in litt.). Kenruckxy: Edmonson County: Mammoth Cave (Hibbard, 1954, in litt.). Warren County: Bowling Green (Garman, 1894, p. 58). Iniinois: Alezander County: Eleo (Elder, 1946, p. 433). Inprana: Putnam County: 5 miles southwest of Greencastle (Butler, 1895, p.86). Washington County: Near Saltillo (Mumford, 1954, in litt.). Plecotus townsendii Cooper Synonymy is given under the subspecies. Distrispution: Central Appalachian Highlands, Ozark Highlands, western United States, southwestern Canada, and Mexico south to the Isthmus of Tehuantepec (figs. 22-24). Description: Adult coloration: Hairs of upperparts gray or slate at base; color of tip varying from pale cinnamon brown to blackish 166 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 brown; division between colors of tip and base often not sharp; hairs at posterior bases of ears frequently paler than those of other parts of dorsum. Mass effect darkens with wear. Hairs of chest and belly slate, gray, or brownish at base, brownish or buff at tip, the division between the colors often not sharp; hairs of chin and throat like remainder of underparts or with darker colored tips; hairs bordering membranes with bases colored like tips. Immature like adult, except darker or duller throughout. Size varies from medium to large for the subgenus; forearm varies from medium, relative to skull length, to long; presternum with lobes not expanded (ventral lobe narrower at tip than lateral lobe) (fig. 5). Rostrum varies from weak and depressed to strong and not depressed; anterior nares relatively small to relatively large, and posterior border rounded, or with angular shape; intermaxillary notch usually relatively broad; median postpalatal process usually styliform, with narrow base (sometimes triangular); auditory bulla averages relatively large; brain case averages relatively shallow for subgenus. I! with secondary cusp varying from prominent to absent (fig. 2); P* with small anterointernal cingular cusp varying from present to absent. Tragus (possibly also auricle) averages relatively long; cross-ribs on interfemoral membrane average 10 or more. ComParRIsons: See pages 138, 140, 142, and 151. ReELATIoNsHIps: Of the three Recent species of the subgenus Corynorhinus, P. townsendii has the largest geographic range and the greatest environmental tolerance. Its geographic range almost spans the continent from east to west and extends through 35 degrees of latitude. It inhabits broadleaf deciduous forests, coniferous forests, prairies, and desert scrub; cool, humid, rain forests and hot, arid, deserts; coastal lowlands and high mountains; areas with great annual temperature variation and areas with slight annual temperature variations. The other species of the subgenus are much more restricted: P. mexicanus to the cool, humid, highlands of northern and central Mexico; P. rafinesquii to the warm, humid, lowlands of the south- eastern United States. P. mexicanus and P. rafinesquti appear to be genetically stable and only slightly variable, whereas P. townsendii is so variable that several geographic races are recognized. P. townsendit appears to be the most plastic, progressive species of the genus Plecotus. Remarks: Plecotus townsendii was long known only by the Colum- bia River specimens upon which Cooper based his 1837 description. Beginning with Harrison Allen in 1864, P. townsendii was confused by all authors with P. rafinesquit (=P. maerotis) until the two species were recognized as distinct by G. M. Allen in 1916. Allen continued AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 167 the confusion of names, however, believing P. rafinesquit and P. macrotis to be the names applicable to the two species. It is now evident (p. 156) that both of these names apply to a single species of the southeastern United States, and that P. townsendii is the name to be used for the wide-ranging species inhabiting parts of Canada, the United States, and Mexico. Hasirat: In a species so widely distributed as P. townsendii, the formulation of a generalized description of its habitat preferences is a difficult matter. For the brief description of such a distributional pattern, the life zones of Merriam are the most useful of the numerous ecological unit concepts that have been proposed. Such units as the biotic provinces, faunal areas, biotic areas, and biotic districts of American authors (Cockrum, 1952, pp. 9-15) are useful in small scale, as in describing the distribution of an animal in a county or a state, but they are not adapted to definition of a range continental in scope. P. townsendit is an inhabitant chiefly of the Upper Sonoran and Transition life zones, ranging in some places into the cooler Canadian zone and in others into the warmer Lower Sonoran zone. Eastern populations occupy parts of the humid subdivisions of the Upper Sonoran (Upper Austral) and Transition zones. This species appears to be absent or generally uncommon in prairie and extreme desert habitats but may be relatively common in a variety of others. Dalquest (1947, pp. 21-24) provided excellent notes on habitats of the species in California (west of the Great Valley). Typical are: Cultivated valleys bordered by broad-leafed trees and dense thickets of brush; nearby hills with extensive grassy slopes, groves of oaks, areas of chaparral, and forests of coniferous trees and madrofia. Oak-covered hills just below the juniper and pifon belt. Coastal lowland supporting dense, ocean-side vegetation, such as brush and lush annuals. Johnson, et al. (1948, p. 343) in the Providence Mountains of the Mohave Desert found this bat in caves and tunnels near the boundary between the yucca belt of the lower slopes and the pifion-juniper belt of the upper slopes of the mountains. In the Pocatello region of Idaho, Whitlow and Hall (1933, p. 243) observed Plecotus in mine tunnels in the juniper belt lying between the Douglas fir-aspen zone of the mountain tops and the sagebrush zone of the valleys. Most Mexican records for P. townsendiz are from arid regions. Thus, Hooper (1955, p. 5) found this species at San Andrés where the hills were grass covered and the nearby mountains were arid, mostly grassy, but with pines and deciduous oaks scattered over the upper slopes, and forming thickets and forest on the canyon floors. How- ever, Goldman (field notes) collected P. townsendii together with P. mexicanus at more humid localities in Guanajuato and Zacatecas where 168 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VoL. 110 oak, pine, juniper, cypress, madrofia, and mansanita were prominent. Bailey (1936, p. 387) noted big-eared bats in the pine-fir-hemlock- broadleaf deciduous forest of western Oregon. Findley and Negus (1953, p. 237) reported a specimen captured at the edge of a spruce-fir forest in Colorado. In Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas, Plecotus occurs in gypsum caves in the zone of meeting of tall-grass and short-grass prairies. Ozark and Appalachian populations inhabit caves mostly in oak-hickory forests. Originally, there were few natural openings in these forests, and even today cultivated areas are mostly restricted to narrow bands along valley bottoms. Some Appalachian caves frequented by big- eared bats are situated in unbroken forest several miles from meadow and farmland. Roostine situs: P. townsendii apparently is a true cave bat, for unlike P. rafinesquit it has not been known to roost in trees. Many populations of the western United States and Mexico have found to their liking such man-made structures as abandoned mine tunnels and pits, wineries, missions, stage stations, etc., and less frequently, occupied human dwellings. Kast of the Rocky Mountains, P. town- sendii has been recorded only in caves; never in houses. In some areas P. townsendii has been quick to appropriate man-made structures as roosting places. For example, Townsend (1839, p. 325) observed that it was already a rather common inhabitant of the Hudson’s Bay Company fur storehouses of the Columbia River district, not long after the construction of the first buildings in that region. Pearson, et al. (1952, p. 317) theorized that since natural caves are few in California, and since most known colonies of Plecotus in that area inhabit man-made structures, it must have been rare in California before the advent of civilization. However, beyond a certain point, increasing the number of roosts does not seem to increase the popula- tion. Large numbers of mine tunnels dug in the western foothills of the Sierra Nevada in the last half of the nineteenth century were subsequently abandoned. Despite the prevalence of apparently suit- able roosts, P. townsendii does not seem to be more numerous in that part of California than elsewhere. Roosts may be classified according to the use made of them by the bats. For P. townsendii there are at least four categories: Winter hibernating roosts, occupied by both sexes; summer nursery roosts, utilized by females and young; ordinary summer roosts, inhabited mostly by males; and summer night-time roosts, used probably by both sexes. With regard to the latter, Dalquest (1947, p. 26) has noted that P. townsendii, in common with several other species of bats, retires to a convenient cave or building to hang up and rest after feeding flights at night. By taking advantage of this habit, AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 169 a collector may utilize the night-time roost as an effective trap. Two small buildings at Lebec, Calif., served as bat traps for Dalquest on 4 June 1945. At midnight the traps held a Plecotus townsendii, 6 Myotis yuwmanensis, and 2 Myotis volans. Earlier in the night these same traps caught 11 Myotis yumanensis, 3 Myotis volans, 1 Myotis californicus, and 4 Antrozous pallidus. Three Myotis thysanodes were taken later in the traps. Often the night-time retreats are uninhabited by bats during daylight hours. There is much variation in the selection of specific microhabitats within the roosting structures chosen by various kinds of bats. Many authors have noted the preference of P. townsendii for an open ceil- ing, wall, or beam rather than a crack or crevice as a roosting site. Apparently this species seldom crawls away from the spot where it first lands, and thus normally is found hanging in places open enough to be reached by flying. In Kansas caverns Twente (1955b, p. 721) observed that this bat characteristically roosted on very rough walls. Wind currents and consequently temperature fluctuations were often great in such places. However, the bats usually rested in slight concavities or behind projections on the rough walls. In these pockets, air movement was slight and the temperature relatively constant in contrast to the gross conditions prevailing a few inches away. The intensity of light in roosting sites of P. townsendii varies from the total darkness of deep caverns or tunnels, to semidarkness in houses, small caves, and near the entrances of deeper structures. With regard to Californian populations, Dalquest (1947, p. 24) re- ported that all retreats of Plecotus that he had examined were dark or but dimly lighted. In the best lighted roosts the bats could be seen without the use of a flashlight once the observer’s eyes had become accustomed to the darkness. Lights were necessary for observation in the other retreats. Likewise, humidity seems to be usually of secondary importance in roost-site selection. Twente (1955b, p. 716) noted an apparent indif- ference of the big-eared bat to varying degrees of humidity (90 to 21 per cent in hibernating sites). Beer and Richards (1956, p. 34) re- ported a similar variation (100 to 38 per cent) in the relative humidity of E’ptesicus hibernating sites. Temperature appears to be the critical factor. Twente (1955b, p. 706) observed that bats must rest in habitats whose temperatures are suited to their metabolic needs. Thus, there may be variation in choice of roost according to season, time of day, weather, sex of bat, etc. For example, hibernating bats must roost in cool places to keep metabolism low so that energy reserves will be conserved. During the feeding season warm roosting sites permit digestion and assimilation of food to proceed. In general, P. townsendii roosts in warm places 170 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 after having eaten and in cool places when food is scarce. In addition, it has been postulated that warm sites may be required for the satis- factory progress of some reproductive processes (pp. 171, 182). The bat’s perception of the microclimate of its roosting site does not seem to be especially good. Twente (1955b, p. 714) determined that P. townsendii apparently locates a suitable roosting spot by a trial and error system. If the spot first selected is unsuitable the bat awakens and moves to another place. Eventually optimum con- ditions may be located. The social tendency of the bats to seek their Own species increases the probability of most of the individuals finding suitable sites. Sociapiuity: P. townsendii seems as a rule not to associate in its daytime and hibernation roosts with other species of bats, although scattered individuals of other normally colonial species occasionally may be present. Often such joint habitation does not actually bring the bats into close contact, for they may occupy different parts of the roosting structure or may occupy the same part at different times. Goldman (field notes) found P. townsendiit hibernating with P. mexicanus in a cave and in an abandoned mine shaft. At one time or another Dalquest (1947, pp. 21-23) noted P. townsendii in the same retreats as Antrozous pallidus, Myotis californicus, M. evotis, M. thysanodes, M. volans, M. yumanensis, and Tadarida mexicana. Stager (1939, p. 226) observed large numbers of P. townsendii, Myotis velifer, and Macrotus californicus, together with smaller numbers of four other species of bats, in an abandoned mine shaft. In addition to the species already noted, Pearson, et al. (1952, p. 275) found AZyotis lucifugus, M. subulatus, and E’ptesicus fuseus roosting with P. townsendit. Two M. subulatus were actually in a cluster of hibernating Plecotus. Ihave found numerous scattered dormant individuals of Myotis lucifugus, M. sodalis, and Pipistrellus subflavus only a few inches from hibernating clusters of Plecotus townsendii in a West Virginia cave. Intraspecific sociability in P. townsendii is seasonally variable. Nursery colonies of females and young are common in summer, but solitary pregnant females are frequently encountered. Males at this season are usually, but not always, solitary. Both sexes have been found together in summer roosts, though usually not clustering to- gether. Winter aggregations may include a random assortment of both sexes, or, according to the physical aspect and atmospheric con- dition of the roost, males and females alike may tend to be solitary. If there is an average seasonal divergence in roost-site selection by the sexes, probably the female prefers cooler winter roosts and warmer spring and summer sites than the male. Dalquest (1947, p. 22) noted females with newborn young gathered so closely together that the edges of the cluster appeared to be a solid AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 171 line. The bats normally pack so tightly in the cluster that their number is usually considerably underestimated in a casual observa- tion. As shown by Twente (1955b, pp. 707, 714, 723) the function of the cluster is seasonally variable. Contrary to the opinion of many authors, the winter cluster func- tions to protect the bats from heat rather than from cold. The body temperatures of the clustered bats approach the temperature of the substrate upon which they are resting, whereas the body temperature of the solitary bat is more affected by the surrounding air temperature. Low body temperatures and consequent low metabolic rates are im- perative to insure conservation of fat reserves through the hibernating season. Beer and Richards (1956, p. 39) have demonstrated for Eptesicus that in some circumstances there may be a delicate balance between length of fasting (hibernating) season and quantity of stored fat in the bat. Unusually high metabolism in the bat or abnormally protracted cold weather result in starvation of the bat. Since temperatures within spring and summer clusters may exceed the environmental temperatures, heat conservation seems to be the primary function of the cluster at these seasons. The higher tempera- tures presumably would aid digestion and assimilation of food. Twente found that Myotis moved to the cooler parts of caves and assumed deeper torpidity, as in winter hibernation, when stormy weather prevented their normal summer foraging flights. Warmer sites were chosen and higher cluster temperatures prevailed after the bats had eaten. Pearson, et al. (1952, pp. 303, 311) suggested that gestation, lactation, and other reproductive processes also might be facilitated by the elevated temperatures maintained in clusters. Clustered young, their metabolism possibly accelerated by the higher temperatures, may grow more rapidly than solitary young. According to the observations of Pearson, et al. (1952, p. 275) in central California and Twente (1955b, p. 724) in Oklahoma and Kansas, nursery colonies of pregnant females begin to form early in April and increase gradually well into May. The colonies may consist of individuals from diverse hibernating sites. Varying from a few to 200 individuals, these colonies remain more or less intact until after the young are weaned in late summer. The bats ordinarily return to the same sites—buildings, mine tunnels, or caves—year after year. Porutation: By studying and banding nursery colonies, Pearson, et al. (1952, p. 314) were able to calculate probable survival rates in P. townsendii. Although differences in habits of males and females render it difficult or impossible to determine the sex ratio in the adult population, the ratio is about 50 : 50 in the young. Only 5.5 per cent of 470 females examined in nursery colonies were neither pregnant nor lactating (reproductive failure is more common in young females than 172 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 in adults). Basing their figures on these facts and on recovery of banded individuals, Pearson, et al., reasoned that a colony of 100 fe- males should produce about 45 young females in a season. Of this number, 20 would survive to join the colony as breeding adults the following season. Assuming an average survival of 80 per cent of these bats each year after their first and an equal rate of mortality for adults of all ages, the colony would, as they found through three years of observations, remain static at about 100 breeding females each season. Age composition of such a colony would be as in table 6, with the me- dian age 3.1 and the average age 5.0 years. Figures beyond the 3-year- old age class are theoretical. TaBLE 6.—Theoretical age composition of a nursery colony of 100 female Plecotus townsendii. (Modified from Pearson, et al., 1952, p. 315.) ACOH NYyCArSe.. wen = sone se 1)2/3,4/]5] 6) 7) 8] 9 j10 {11 12 J13 |14 |15 |16 |17 {18 | 19 Number of individuals-_--__-- ZONLEH1S OWS WS 40 SS 2 [2 ty Py ee Pole a Pearson, et al. (1952, p. 316) estimated a population density of one P. townsendii per 310 acres on 62,000-acre Santa Cruz Island off the coast of California. The island was shared with at least an equal number of Antrozous pallidus and an undetermined number of Myotis californicus. Basing their estimate on the spacing of known colonies, these authors supposed that on the mainland of California the popula- tion density might be as small as one Plecotus per 419 acres, but supposed that in actuality each Plecotus probably had available con- siderably less than 419 acres. This would be especially true if un- known food habits restrict the hunting of P. townsendit. By doubling the estimated total of individuals in nursery colonies, Twente (1955a, p. 387) determined that there might be 300 to 500 P. townsendii in the gypsum caves of extreme northern Oklahoma and adjacent parts of Kansas. For the same area he estimated 25,000 to 50,000 Tadarida brasiliensis, 15,000 to 20,000 Myotis velifer, and 200 to 400 Antrozous pallidus. No estimate was made for H’ptesicus fuscus and Pipistrellus subflavus which were present in smaller numbers. How populations of P. townsendii are limited is not clear. Probably the same factors do not operate throughout the bat’s range. Twente (1955a, p. 388) calculated that the yearly mortality could not exceed 33.3 per cent in animals with a reproductive potential of only one young per year if the population was to maintain a constant level. On this basis the daily population decrease could not be more than 1.1 per thousand. Twente suggested that in Kansas and Oklahoma the observed predation on bats by rat snakes, raccoons, hawks, owls, AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 173 and other animals might account for such a loss and thus would be the primary limiting factor. Rice (1957, p. 30) postulated that predation by rat and corn snakes, opossums, owls, and cockroaches was the most important mortality factor among populations of Myotis austroriparius in Florida. The possibility of antisocial tendencies and consequent need of some degree of privacy from other species of bats might be a limiting factor for P. townsendii where roosting places are not abundant. Pearson, et al. (1952, p. 317) believed it most likely that the popula- tion level of this species in California depended upon the number of suitable winter roosting sites and the number of summer roosting sites surrounded by adequate feeding territory. Their data indicated that disease, predation, and amount of food and water probably did not limit the Californian populations. They observed that colonies remained static in size, year after year, and believed that a species population increase might depend on establishment of new nursery colonies. How new nursery colonies become established is not known. Pearson, et al. (1952, p. 317) determined that when a satisfactory nursery site becomes available near an already-established colony, the colony does not divide to make use of both sites, but uses either one or the other, or alternates between the two. Consequently, they thought, for a new nursery colony to become established, some females either through chance, faulty navigation, or some inner drive must find a suitable roosting place outside of the range of an existing colony. Furthermore, they believed it necessary for several females to arrive at this place almost simultaneously if gestation were to proceed normally, since females are gregarious and may depend upon clustering to keep their body temperatures high. These hypotheses might serve to explain the evident slowness of Plecotus in reoccupying apparently suitable territory to the north of their present geographic range since the retreat of the Wisconsin glaciers. PARASITES AND DISEASE: No ticks, lice, fleas, or bedbugs have been reported on P. townsendit, and this bat is not particularly noted for heavy infestations of other ectoparasites. Winged parasitic flies of the family Streblidae (Zrichobius cory- norhini Cockerell and Trichobius quadrisetosus Kessel) appear to be encountered most often. I have noted flies of this family on specimens of Plecotus from Veracruz and West Virginia. Others have reported them as follows: Sprague (1938, p. 500) an infestation in Oklahoma, Wilson (1946, p. 86) in West Virginia, Dalquest (1947, p. 30) no more than one per bat in California, Krutzsch (1955, p. 458) up to three or four per bat on fur and membranes of specimens from “‘western 7A: PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM You. 110 North America,” and Smith (1934, p. 63) up to eight or ten per bat, mostly in the ears, on specimens from Kansas and Oklahoma. Wingless parasitic flies of the family Nycteribiidae (Baszlia antrozot Townsend and Basilia corynorhini Ferris) (Stiles and Nolan, 1931, p. 715) seem to be generally less common on P. townsendiz, although Dalquest (1947, p. 30) found up to five per bat in California and Krutzsch (1955, p. 458) up to two or three per bat in ‘‘western North America.”’ Sprague (1938, p. 500) reported mites on specimens from Oklahoma, and Krutzsch (1955, p. 458) found up to eight or nine mites of the genus Ichoronyssus per bat on the membranes of specimens from ‘western North America.” One of four California specimens of P. townsendii examined by Mitchell (1956, p. 444) was infected with Trypanosoma vespertilionis. Twente (1955a, p. 387) discovered a possibly diseased specimen of P. townsendii in a cavern in Kansas on 31 October. It was a fat male, and although it had a rectal temperature of 93.9° I. it was very feeble and was unable to fly. A week later it was found dead. Foop: Apparently no one has observed P. townsendii engaged in its normal feeding activity. Little is known of its food habits. Hamilton (1943, p. 104) reported that all specimens that he had examined contained only the remains of Lepidoptera. Pearson, et al. (1952, p. 317) believed that P. townsendii eats moths and other insects (probably mostly flying insects). In stomachs of P. townsendit and Myotis velifer hibernating together in an Oklahoma cave, Sprague (1988, p. 500) found remains of insects and hairs of both species of bats. Inasmuch as the bats were heavily parasitized with bat flies (Streblidae), Sprague supposed that the bats might be feeding on the parasites. Twente (1955b, p. 713) observed no evidence of feeding among hibernating populations that he studied in Oklahoma and Kansas. Pearson, et al. (1952, p. 274) found it difficult to induce captive big- eared bats to feed themselves. The bats were offered mealworms, supplemented occasionally by percomorph oil. Most could be taught in a day or so to accept decapitated mealworms forced into their mouths. Self-feeding was encouraged by stringing mealworms on wires along the sides of the cage. Some individuals eventually learned to eat worms from a dish, although many had to be hand fed through- out their captivity. As many as 40 mealworms might be taken daily. The most successful captives were ones that had learned to feed them- selves and were kept in a cage large enough to permit flight. However, pregnant individuals, even though eating well, aborted or resorbed their embryos. The maximum period of survival in captivity was about six months. Some individuals survived without food when kept AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 5 at a temperature of 45° F. in almost-covered aquaria stocked with drinking water. Movements: Cockrum (1956a, p. 51) classified the movements of bats in three major categories: Diurnal movements (routine daily movements in quest of food and water), local migrations (irregular movements from one roost to another without regard for season), and seasonal migrations (seasonal movement from one roost to another, perhaps as little as ten miles or less apart). These categories overlap and are not clearcut. Consequently, some movements are difficult to classify. DiurRNAL MOVEMENTS: H. H. T. Jackson (field notes) encountered P. townsendii in the month of August in a cave at the east side of Montezuma Well, Arizona. During the day the bats occupied the dark interior parts of the cave, but late in the afternoon they were to be found in the partially lighted section near the entrance. At this time they were unusually wild and the slightest noise or shadow caused them to retire to the deeper parts of the cave. Twente (1955b, p. 727) described a similar light-sampling behavior of P. townsendii in a cavern in Kansas. ‘Toward evening the bats moved from the depths of the cavern to lateral depressions near the entrance. From these stations they made periodic sorties to the entrance until nightfall allowed their departure from the cavern. Many authors have noted that P. townsendii leaves its daytime retreat only after darkness has fallen. Dalquest (1947, p. 24) believed that the species had never been observed in its hunting flight. Pear- son, et al. (1952, p. 274) stated that it is a relatively late-flying species, emerging from its roosting structure after dark and not returning until almost dawn. On the other hand, Vernon Bailey (field notes) reported that in the Sundance region of Wyoming: These are the earliest bats seen flying in the evening, and they seem to come from various parts or openings in the canyon walls. When they first come out it is light enough to see their long ears as they fly about. Their flight is rather slow and they would be easy to shoot... . Bailey (1930, p. 181) again saw big-eared bats in early evening flight at Yellowstone National Park, and shot two (1936, p. 387) one evening at McKenzie Bridge, Oregon, when they circled about at the edge of the forest. Krutzsch and Heppenstall (1955, p. 127) shot a P. townsendii in Utah as the bat foraged in the early twilight. Hamilton (1943, p. 102) watched big-eared bats leave a West Virginia cave during the late dusk. The cave opening was well above the valley floor, and the emerging bats first flew yet higher, soaring and circling at a height of several hundred feet until it was too dark for successful shooting. Then they descended to within a few feet of the ground. 497256—59 6 176 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 During the hibernating season there is considerable movement of bats within the roost. Apparently the selection of a suitable spot for hibernation is a hit or miss proposition. Thus the bats repeatedly awaken from dormancy and move to other spots until a favorable site is located. Consequently, a few flying bats are likely to be found in the roost at any time, although the majority of individuals may be lethargic (p. 179). To illustrate this, Pearson, et al. (1952, p. 278) in midwinter marked with chalk the locations of 56 torpid bats in a California cave. Temperature within the cave was 34°F. Particu- lar effort was made to avoid disturbing the bats. The following day there were as before 56 torpid bats in the chamber, but at least 17 had moved to new locations. Records indicate that males are more active in winter than females. Loca MIGRATIONS: At all seasons individuals or populations of P. townsendit may normally alternate between two or more roosts, or may irregularly seek new roosts. These facts have been emphasized by the banding of hibernating populations and by the observation of nursery colonies. Banding operations in West Virginia (504 Plecotus, Mohr, 1952, p. 7), Kansas (155 Plecotus, Twente, 1955a, p. 380), and California (1500 Plecotus, Pearson, et al., 1952, p. 274) all indicate movement of P. townsendii from cave to cave during even the coldest weather. Much of this movement undoubtedly was precipitated by the disturbance to the bats when they were banded, or when the band numbers were read. Twente (1955a, p. 380) found that when thus disturbed the bats invariably awakened and left the cavern, not to be seen there again for several days or months, if ever. The banding data indicated in addition that there was considerable movement from cave to cave by bats that had not been disturbed by banding. Apparently these individuals were seeking circumstances more favor- able for hibernation. Pearson, et al. (1952, p. 276) described the effect of disturbance on a nursery colony. One evening, after the adult bats had left the roost, their 75 young were banded. ‘The adults returned, picked up their young, and by morning all were settled in an alternate roost 1.3 miles away. How the colony quickly agreed to move and arrived intact at a distant new roosting place is an intriguing mystery. SEASONAL MIGRATIONS: There is no evidence of long migrations by P. townsendu. Among the 1500 banded in California by Pearson, et al. (1952, p. 275) most that were recaptured were recovered at the original banding site or not more than 1.5 miles from it. A young male found dead 20 miles from his birthplace was the most distant recovery. ‘Twenty-four percent of 504 individuals banded in West Virginia were recovered in a subsequent season, all near their banding AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY Lhd sites. For information on dates of movements to and from nursery and hibernating roosts, see pp. 171, 180, and 183. Homrine: Only Cockrum (1956a, p. 49) has reported homing experi- ments with P. townsendii. He secured 54 individuals from a cave in Arizona in May. These were released at a point 28 miles away. Three of the bats were recovered at the home cave two days later and a fourth two months later. Fuicut: After spending several hours swinging a butterfly net in a nearly futile attempt to capture P. townsendw confined in a room, Dalquest (1947, p. 24) concluded that this bat sees well, is a swift flier, an agile dodger, and possesses an excellent sense for danger. Hundreds, if not thousands, of sweeps netted but one bat in free flight. Not only is P. townsendii adroit at avoiding hand-operated nets, but some characteristic keeps it from becoming entangled in mist nets as well. Although these nets are very effective for capturing many species of bats, those that do not forage near the ground and those whose flight is slow, cautious, and butterfly-like are seldom taken. Also, perhaps those with an unusually well developed echo location apparatus can detect and avoid the nets more readily. Only Baker (1956, p. 187) has reported taking P. townsendv in a mist net. The flight of captive big-eared bats has been described in detail by Grinnell (1918, p. 344) and Dalquest (1947, p.25). In the confinement of a room, the flight pattern most often was a figure eight, varied with ovals and circles, extending from floor level to the beamed recesses of the ceiling. Flight character varied from hovering like a humming- bird to slow and butterfly-like to swift and swallow-like. Wing-beats, deep and smooth, often alternated with short glides. In average flight the head was bent ventrally so that the body formed a smooth curve from chin to tip of tail. The ears, pointed forward and held almost parallel to the horizontal plane of the body, were, surprisingly, scarcely noticeable. The legs were spread apart so that the inter- femoral membrane was expanded. I have noted that in slow flight the head is not so depressed and the ears are more conspicuous, as they are held more nearly perpendicular to the horizontal plane of the body. On some occasions the flight of P. townsendii may be silent, with no squeaking, swishing, or fluttering. At other times it is relatively noisy. When it alights on a wall or ceiling, P. townsendii swoops up from below, its wings close, and with great agility it flips over so that its feet become foremost and almost simultaneously grasp a foothold. Restine posture: In ordinary sleep the big-eared bat normally hangs free, suspended only by the feet (see Dalquest, 1947, p. 25, for a detailed description). Many observers have noted its peculiarity 178 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 of frequently hanging suspended*by only one foot, and Dalquest (1947, p. 29) has pointed out that the truly lethargic bat clings with both feet and thumbs and presses its body tightly to the surface of its roost-site. Among big-eared bats hibernating in the gypsum cav- erns of Oklahoma and Kansas, Twente (1955b, p. 721) observed a different posture. The ears were folded back along the neck, the fingers were spread so that the wings effectively covered the ventral surface of the body, the tail and interfemoral membrane were bent down to cover the venter and hind parts of the wings, and the long body hairs stood out perpendicularly. In this position the bat was practically enveloped with a layer of dead air, effectively insulating it from the surrounding warm air of the cavern, and helping it to assume a body temperature similar to that of the substrate from which it was suspended. Grinnell and Swarth (1913, p. 380) noted a similar posture in lethargic big-eared bats in California. The normal position of the ear in the undisturbed resting bat ap- pears to be coiled back and down tightly against the side of the neck like aram’s horn. The posterior portion of the ear is wrinkled, rather accordion-like, and there is lateral contraction in accomplishing the spiral shape. The ears can be coiled independently, and sometimes an individual is seen with one ear erect while the other is coiled. Ap- parently the tragus always remains erect, regardless of the position of the ear. Upon superficial examination, when the ear is coiled, the erect tragus may be mistaken for the ear. Possibly P. townsendii sometimes adopts the common ear posture of the resting P. auritus, that is, with the ear folded back against the side of the neck and chest and partially concealed beneath the folded wing, rather than coiled against the side of the head and neck (Grin- nell and Swarth, 1913, p. 380; Howell, 1920, p. 174; Alcorn, 1944, p. 309). When the bat is not lethargic, the ears are unfurled at the slightest alarm, and move with increasing vigor as the observer approaches. The sight of a tightly packed cluster of bats with long ears quivering, waving, and in constant motion is a memorable one. Hamilton (1943, p. 102) and Mohr (1933, p. 50) noted that big- eared bats lapsed into disoriented flight or fell stunned when guns were discharged near them in caves. These authors presumed that the auditory apparatus of P. townsendii is more sensitive than that of bats with smaller ears. Voice: The voice of P. townsendir is difficult to describe. A high pitched twittering is commonly heard both in roosts and in captivity. H. W. Grinnell (1918, p. 344) noted that an individual “protested in shrill cicada-like notes” when handled. Grinnell and Swarth (1913, p. 380) described the voice as a “‘grating squeak,”’ and Dalquest (1947, AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 179 p. 29) stated that semi-lethargic individuals were able to “‘hiss’’ when disturbed. Mohr (1933, p. 50) reported that E. L. Poole made the following observations on the call of an individual less than a week old: “Tt has a ventriloquial hollow cuc-cuc-cuc, like a yellow-billed cuckoo; close at hand a high thin tse-tse-tse, like the song of a blackpoll warbler, which could be heard synchronized with the other sound.” HisernaTion: Hibernation in an animal is a state of lethargy in which body temperature is depressed in correspondence with a low environmental temperature and in which physiological activity is proportionally curtailed. Hibernation may be of long or short dura- tion. Among bats there appears to be no clear distinction between sleep and hibernation. When the bat rests its temperature approaches that of its environment. Thus, without regard for season, if the air temperature of its roosting place is low enough, the bat assumes a lethargic condition. However, Twente (1955b, p. 713) found that the body temperature of bats difficult to awaken and bats easy to awaken may be the same. He postulated that the degree of lethargy is dependent upon how high or how low the bat’s body temperature has been during the period of lethargy. This factor would determine the amount of stored food that had been catabolized during the period of inactivity. The pri- mary wastes of this process are carbon dioxide, nitrogenous byprod- ucts, and water. The observation that Myotis nearly always urinates when awakened suggested to Twente that a possible factor causing awakening is the amount of urine in the bladder and the nervous con- sequences of bladder distension. He proposed that it would be more appropriate to refer to the bat’s lethargic state in degrees of irritabil- ity rather than in degrees of lethargy. Thus, bats hibernating in places that are warm or have fluctuating low temperatures are usually more irritable than those that have been hibernating in places that have relatively constant low temperatures. Similarly, bats at the edges of clusters tend to be more irritable than those in the center, for they have been members of the cluster the shortest time and have higher temperatures and a higher rate of metabolism. If the place that the bat has selected for hibernation is unsuitable, the animal awakens, probably because a high metabolic rate has made it irritable, and moves to another place. The bat always awakens and moves when the temperature of its environment approaches 32° F. Twente (loc. cit.) found that once the awakening process is initiated, the bat’s body temperature rises at a constant and rapid rate (about 1.8° F. per minute for P. townsendii) until flight becomes possible for the animal. Reeder and Cowles (1951, p. 395) determined the thresh- old of flight to be at a rectal temperature of 73.9° F. in P. townsendia. Twente’s specimens of this species flew at a rectal temperature of 180 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 75.2° F. but did not fly agily until a temperature of 82° to 86° F. was reached. Pearson, et al. (1952, p. 276) found most P. townsendi lethargic at air temperatures below 62° F. and recorded temperature as low as 28.5° F. near hibernating individuals. Twente (1955b, p. 715) ob- served an air temperature range of 37.4° to 69.8° F’. where lethargic big-eared bats were resting. When Dalquest (1947, p. 29) placed active specimens of P. townsendii in a refrigerator at a temperature of 40° F. all became lethargic within 20 minutes. Pearson, et al. (1952, p. 277) observed in their studies of P. town- sendii in California that the bats began to arrive in their hibernating quarters in late October, reached peak numbers in January, and de- parted by April. Females arrived earlier and stayed later than males. Females were usually lethargic both day and night during the coldest periods, whereas males tended to awaken at night the year around, even in midwinter. During spring, summer, and fall both sexes were usually alert day and night and lethargic individuals were uncommon, especially in September when the males were coming into breeding condition. In central California, Pearson, et al. (1952, p. 280) found that some male P. townsendii apparently did not hibernate. Individuals came to night roosting places throughout the winter in outside air tempera- tures ranging from 37° to 57° F. Winter records of females at night roosts were more irregular but indicated activity on nights when the outside air temperature ranged between 47° and 57° F. Pearson, et al., did not determine what food sustained this winter activity. Although flying insects were probably scarce at this season, these authors captured adult male bats that lacked stored fat. Elsewhere, males that they weighed averaged 8.36 grams on 3 February and had dropped 0.64 grams to 7.72 grams by 2 April. This loss probably rep- resented the amount of stored fat required to sustain the bats for this period (temperatures 37° to 50° F.) without intake of additional food. For further data on roosts, sociability, and movement during hiber- nation, see pp. 168, 170, and 176. Repropuction: Unless otherwise noted, all of the following infor- mation on repreduction in P. townsendii is taken from Pearson, et al. (1952, pp. 281-314). Insemination.—The mating season extends from early October to late February. Copulatory activity is greatest in the winter roosts, but some, perhaps most, females have mated at least once before they arrive at the wintering places. Unmated females may be found throughout September, but spermatozoa are to be found in all after about the third week of October. Young females (as little as 3 or 4 months old) mate as early as do adult females, but because they pro- AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 181 duce few sperms and because their sex accessories are small, young males (4 to 9 months old) are almost certainly sterile in their first breeding season. At times the males, more or less active throughout the winter, ap- proach and probably achieve intromission with lethargic females. The passive state of the females and the absence of a vaginal plug would permit each female to be mated many times in the course of the winter. Since all females in the hibernating quarters contain sperma- tozoa by late October, subsequent copulatory activity on the part of the males must be directed toward females already inseminated. It is not known how the male circumvents the female’s interfemoral membrane, which during lethargy is usually curled tightly over the abdomen. The only copulation that Pearson, et al., observed took place on a cave ceiling too high to allow observation of detail. How- ever, the male embraced the female from behind in the usual manner of copulating mammals. Precopulatory activity was observed among captive bats. The female hung by her feet and was approached from the front by a male. Twittering, the male proceeded to embrace the female with his wings, then vigorously rubbed his snout, perhaps making use of his muzzle glands, over the foreparts and ventral surface of the female. A strong bat odor was noted. Sperm storage.—Spermatozoa of bats are viable for surprisingly long periods. In male P. townsendii they retain their motility for six or more months after they reach the epididymis. However, it is not known whether motile spring spermatozoa are capable of fertilizing. Spermatozoa remained abundant in the uteri of females kept isolated in cool temperatures for as long as 108 days. Probably in P. town- sendii, as in other vespertilionid bats, spermatozoa stored over winter in the female reproductive tract are capable of fertilizing in the spring. After ovulation, spermatozoa disappear quickly from the uterus. Ovulation.—In P. townsendii ovulation occurs from February to April. Maturation of the ovarian follicle and its subsequent ovula- tion may depend upon the stimulation of copulation, and this stimulus may be effective even though administered several months before ovulation. It appears that there is an autumnal and early winter period during which ovulation normally will not occur. Neither fe- males that are active in winter nor those that are lethargic in winter ovulate before spring, and those that are removed from hibernation and kept at warm temperatures do not ovulate readily. The possi- bilities of sperm storage in the female and insemination of unreceptive females while they are lethargic may have permitted the advanced copulatory period to evolve. Gestation.—The duration of gestation may depend upon the body 182 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 temperature of the bat and upon whether or not it was lethargic during a portion of the period. Variation in environmental conditions in hibernating quarters and nursery roosts thus may have a profound effect on gestation. The gestation period varied from 56 to 100 days in the California populations of P. townsendi studied by Pearson, et al. Parturition.—The birth process was observed in a captive female. She hung from the wire top of her cage by widespread hind feet and thumbs. Her tail was curled upward so that it completed the ‘“in- verted umbrella” effect and made it quite unlikely that the young could fall. In fact, not even a drop of blood or fluid reached the cage floor. This position was maintained all during parturition and for half an hour afterward. The birth was a breech presentation. With- in minutes the fluids and afterbirth were consumed by the mother, and while she licked her membranes and ofispring, the young moved for- ward, secured a nipple, and attached its feet to the top of the cage. A single young is the rule in this species, and 49 out of 50 embryos were found in the right horn of the uterus. After parturition this horn never returns to its original small size, but remains larger than the left, about 1.5 to 2 mm. in diameter. This disparity in size may lead to presumably erroneous reports of fall pregnancies as that of Bailey (1936, p. 390). The average date of parturition of a colony varies from year to year, and there seems to be a considerable variation in the spread of birth dates in different colonies (19 to 35 days). It is probable that birth dates extend over a long period in a colony whose females roosted in diverse places with a variety of environmental temperatures before they congregated at the nursery colony. There is evidence also that young females tend to join the nursery colony later in the spring than do adults, and that they bear their young later in the season than do adults. Pearson, et al., estimated birth dates for several hundred western American P. townsendzi from specimens, field notes, and literature by reference to graphs relating embryo size and forearm length to age (figs. 20, 21). The earliest calculated birth date was 19 April in California, and the latest was 22 July in Arizona. Records for the Appalachian population indicate a similar breeding season. Growth of young.—Pearson, et al., described the newborn P. town- sendit as a grotesque creature, its large ears flopping over its unopened eyes and the disproportionately large size of its thumbs and hind feet giving it a spider-like appearance. The following chronology of growth was set forth: The average weight of newborn young was 2.4 grams, and the forearm length averaged 16.6 mm. (there is no significant size varia- AMERICAN BATS—-HANDLEY 183 = = Ig °|. wi te 23 [6 = 21 “14 ae 12 to me he = = 15 z a 2 er ww 15 ae (e! ost 4 a u 9 = fee pees St o 5 x ES: oO °o = 3 i o = Ww — AGE IN DAYS. Ficure 20.—Average growth-rate of embryo in Plecotus townsendit pallescens. Measure- ments in millimeters. (Modified from Pearson, et al., 1952, p. 302.) tion between sexes until late in development when smaller size of male becomes apparent). Within a few hours the young one is able to utter a characteristic sharp, metallic “chirp.”’ The dried umbilical cord may remain attached for a day or two. Before five days of age the naked pink body becomes covered with short gray hair. At seven days the young bat can make the ‘‘squaking” noise of the dis- turbed adult, and the ears assume the erect position of the adult. A few days later the eyes open. Up to the age of 16 days (forearm less than 35 mm.), while the growth curve is approximately linear, the forearm lengthens 1.2 mm. per day. Forearm length is a reliable indicator of age up to about three weeks. At four weeks the forearm is so close to adult length that it can no longer be relied upon. The young fly at about two and a half to three weeks of age, and at six weeks some young fly out at night as do the adults. The summer colonies start to break up in August when the older young are just over three months old. Lactation.—In Plecotus there is a single pair of pectoral mammae, lateral in position. Tiny nipples (less than 0.6 mm. long in fresh specimens) are characteristic of young and nonparous females, and once a female has borne young the nipples do not return again to the tiny category, although they frequently become small again. The nipples of the young remain tiny through the summer, fall, and winter of their first year, and begin to enlarge at about the time of implantation of the embryo. The nipples reach full size (up to about 3 mm. in length) at the end of pregnancy or shortly thereafter. 184 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 ADULT ¢ 42 a eeae=— os ADULT & | FLYING | ‘FLUT TERING leves OPEN | EARS UP t GRAY: FUZZ 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 AGE IN DAYS Figure 21.—Average growth-rate of forearm in Plecotus townsendii pallescens. Measure- ments in millimeters. (Modified from Pearson, et al., 1952, p. 313.) The young probably nurse with their heads hanging down, and most nursing must occur during the day, for from the time that they are born or within a day or two of their birth, the young bats are left in the roost at night while the adults go out to feed. Banding has proved that each female bat unerringly selects her own young from amongst the many in the cluster when she returns to the nursery from her foraging flight. The young bats cling to anything that comes into their grasp, and it is difficult to remove them from their mother. A disturbed mother may sometimes be seen flying with a young-one dangling from a nipple, but usually the young bat clings to its mother’s fur with well- clawed thumbs and feet, as well as to the nipple with its mouth. Adults may fly with attached volant young weighing as much as six grams—about two-thirds of the adult’s weight. It is difficult to tell when lactation ceases, but it appears that females nurse their young for about two months. By that time the young are as large as their mothers and are skillful fliers. Mott: The young big-eared bat molts from its juvenile pelage to adult pelage at about the time that it reaches adult body size, be- tween the ages of one and two months. One collected on 7 August at Burkes Garden, Va. (USNM 157075), was beginning the molt on chest and belly. Three collected on Sand Creek, Wyo. (USNM), on 24 August, had barely begun to molt. Adults have a single complete molt annually, most commonly in August. Possibly the molt normally occurs earlier in males than in females. New hairs usually appear at almost the same time on all AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 185 parts of the body. Short, prostrate, new hairs are found on some individuals as early as June (MVZ 103184, o&, San Luis Obispo County, Calif., 24 June) or July (USNM 250084, o, Fallon, Nev., 7 July). Specimens from Evergreen, Calif. (MVZ 71619, o, 2 Au- gust), Huachuca Mountains, Ariz. (UI 4674, o', 7 August, and UI 1425, 9, 15 August), and Vidal, Calif. (LSU 1121, 9, 29 August) were molting when captured. Six of seven females (USNM) taken on 24 August along Sand Creek, Wyo., were molting. Of five speci- mens (USNM) collected on 24 August at Las Cruces, N. Mex., one male had completed the molt; one female had completed the molt on the dorsum, but was still molting on the belly; two females were molting on all parts of the body; and one male apparently had not begun to molt. Seme of the summer specimens from New Mexico and southern California have a peculiar, short, woolly, relatively sparse pelage, possibly due to early shedding of guard hairs. The same condition has been observed in some specimens of P. mexicanus. Plecotus townse ndii australis Handley Plecotus (Corinorhinus) townsendi J. A. Allen, 1890, p. 176. Corynorhinus macrotis pallescens Miller, 1897, p. 52. (Part.) Corynorhinus megalotis mexicanus G. M. Allen, 1916, p. 347. (Part.) Corynorhinus rafinesquit mexicanus Miller, 1924, p. 83. (Part.) Plecotus rafinesquizt mexicanus Dalquest, 1953, p. 64. (Part.) Corynorhinus townsendii australis Handley, 1955c, p. 147. Hoiotypge: USNM 297265; adult female in alcohol, skull removed; collected 20 December 1952 by Aurelio Maélaga Alba; 2 miles west of Jacala, 5,500 feet, Hidalgo, Mexico; collector’s No. 1053. Distrispution: Arid interior mountain ranges of central and north- ern Mexico (fig. 24). North to San Juan, Durango, and near Hacienda La Mariposa, Coahuila. East to near Hacienda La Mariposa and near Bella Unién, Coahuila; Presa de Guadalupe, San Luis Potosi; near Jacala and near Yoltepec, Hidalgo; Lago Texcoco, México; and Oaxaca, Oaxaca. South to Oaxaca, Oaxaca; Cuernavaca, Morelos; and San Andrés, Jalisco. West to San Andrés, Jalisco; Sierra de Val- paraiso, Zacatecas; and San Juan, Durango. Zonal distribution: Upper Sonoran and upper portion of Lower Sonoran. Altitudinal distribution: 1,800 to 9,500 feet. Most collecting stations are between 4,000 and 7,000 feet. Description: Adult coloration: Hair of upperparts between Benzo Brown and Fuscous at base; tips brighter brown, burnished with dark brown; mass effect between Russet and Cinnamon-Brown; hair bases sharply differentiated from tips. Hair of underparts Natal Brown at base; tips about Light Pinkish Cinnamon on belly, somewhat darker on throat. 186 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 V Ks © aR NTT q : Hin , Seeenas) Ficure 22.—Distribution of Plecotus townsendii Cooper (western section): 1, P. t. pal- lescens; 2, P. t. townsendii. Solid symbols, specimens examined; open symbols, other records; encircled symbols, type localities. Cross-hatching indicates known areas of intergradation between subspecies (between pallescens and townsendit in California, Nevada, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and British Columbia; between pallescens and ingens in northern Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas; and between pallescens and australis in western Texas, Chihuahua, and Coahuila). Size averages medium for the subgenus; forearm averages relatively long. Rostrum averages relatively long, dorsolaterally inflated, and usually not particularly depressed; anterior nares relatively large and usually rounded posteriorly (dorsal view). First upper incisor nor- mally without secondary cusp; upper canine averages less robust than in northern populations; anterointernal cingular cusp of P* frequently present. : MEASUREMENTs: See tables 10, 16. AMERICAN BATS—-HANDLEY 187 Wn a Se ee: X oe ne -—— Figure 23.—Distribution of Plecotus townsend1i Cooper (eastern section): 1, P. t. ingens; 2, P. t. virginianus. Solid symbols, specimens examined; open symbols, other records; encircled symbols, type localities. Cross-hatching indicates known areas of intergrada- tion between subspecies ingens and pallescens. Comparisons: P. t. australis is most similar to P. t. pallescens, but averages darker, browner, and less cinnamon dorsally. P. t. australis averages larger in most cranial dimensions than Arizonan P. t. pal- lescens, but can be scarcely distinguished cranially from other popula- tions of P. t. pallescens. For comparison with P. mexicanus, see account of that species. Remarks: Mexican populations of P. townsendii are relatively uni- form in coloration and cranial characters despite the wide range of latitude and elevation inhabited. The greatest divergence noted is in specimens from San Andrés, Jalisco, in which the rostrum is unusually 188 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 i SHTsiaaiy Ficure 24.—Distribution of Plecotus townsendii Cooper (southern section): 1, P. t. australis; 2, P. t. ingens; 3, P. t. pallescens. Solid symbols, specimens examined; open symbols, other records; encircled symbols, type localities. Cross-hatching indicates known areas of intergradation between subspecies (between pallescens and ingens in northern Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas; between pallescens and australis in western Texas, Chihuahua, and Coahuila). broad and inflated. Indeed, the whole skull is broad (reflected in zygomatic breadth, breadth of brain case, etc.) in those specimens. P. t. australis intergrades with P. t. pallescens. Samples from south- ern Coahuila have the coloration of P. ¢. australis. 'Two specimens from near San Buenaventura in central Coahuila resemble P. ¢. pal- lescens, whereas one from the Chisos Mountains, Texas, is very similar to P. t. australis. Other specimens from the Big Bend region of Texas and Chihuahua are, on the average, sufficiently similar to P. t. palles- cens to be identified as that subspecies, and central and southeastern New Mexican specimens are essentially identical with samples of typical P. t. pallescens (northern and central Arizona). Apparently AMERICAN BATS—-HANDLEY 189 intergradation between these two races of P. townsendw occurs in northern Coahuila and western Texas. SPECIMENS EXAMINED.—A total of 58 from the following locali- ties: MEXICO: Coaunuita: 1 mile south and 4 miles west of Bella Unién, 7,000 feet, 3s (KU); 4 miles west of Hacienda La Mariposa, 2,300 feet, 1s (KU); one-half mile north of Muralla, 4,500 feet, 19bs (IU); 9 miles west and 4 miles south of San Buenaventura, 2,000 feet, 8s (KU); Sierra Guadalupe, 7,800 feet, 10 miles south and 5 miles west of General Cepeda, Is (KU). Duranao: San Juan, 3,800 feet, 12 miles west of Lerdo, 2s (UMMZ). Guanasvato: Santa Rosa [9,500 feet], 7a (USNM). Guanasuato?: Charcas, 5a (USNM). Hrpauco: Grutas Xoxafi, 6.6 miles southeast of Yoltepec [= Yolotepec?, 6,600 feet], 1s (KU); 2 miles west of Jacala, 5,500 feet, 3a (USNM); Rfo Tasquillo (Rio de Tula), 5,200 feet, 16 miles east [=12 miles south-southeast?] of Zimapdn, ls (TCWC). Jauisco: San Andrés [4,900 feet], 10 miles west of Magdalena, 3s (UMMZ); San Pedro, Guadala- jara, ls (AMNH). Mégxico: Convento de Acolman, 9 miles north of México, Distrito Federal, 1s (IB); Lago Texcoco, 7,500 feet, la (USNM). Moretos: Cuernavaca [4,900 feet], 1a (USNM). Oaxaca: Oaxaca [Motne Albdn, 6,500 feet, 3 miles southwest of Oaxaca], la (USNM). San Luts Porosf: Bledos [6,200 feet], Is (LSU)1; Presa de Guadalupe [4,000 feet] Is (LSU). Zacarncas: Sierra de Val- paraiso [13 miles west of Valparaiso, 8,200 feet], Is (USNM). ‘‘Merxico’’: No exact locality, 1b (USNM). ADDITIONAL RECORDS: The following records probably refer to this form: ‘ MEXICO: Distrito FEDERAL: Desierto de los Leones [measurements taken by Villa in 1958, according to my instructions, agree fairly well with those of P. t. australis] (Villa R., 1953, p. 340). San Luis Potosf; Hacienda La Parada [6,000 feet] (Miller, 1897, p. 53). Plecotus townsendii ingens Handley Corynorhinus rafinesquet rafinesquet Sealander, 1951, p. 465. Corynorhinus townsendit ingens Handley, 1955c, p. 148. Houotryrpe: USNM 296767; adult male, skin and skull; collected 4 December 1950 by John A. Sealander; Hewlitt Cave, 12 miles west of Fayetteville, Washington County, Ark; collector’s No. 50-14. DistripuTion: Ozark Highlands in northwestern Arkansas and southwestern Missouri (fig. 23); possibly also extreme eastern Okla- homa. North to Stone County, Missouri. South to Washington County, Ark. Zonal distribution, Upper Austral. Altitudinal dis- tribution, approximately 1,000 to 1,500 feet. ‘ Description: Adult coloration: Mass effect of upperparts be- tween Hazel and Mars Brown; hair bases Fuscous. Hair of under- parts between Light Vinaceous-Cinnamon and Light Pinkish Cinna- mon distally, the bases, except those bordering membranes, Fuscous; bases of border hairs same as tips. Distinction between bases and tips of hairs fairly sharp, on both dorsum and underparts. 190 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Size averages large; forearm averages relatively long; skull of heavy construction; rostrum relatively long, inflated, and not de- pressed; anterior nares average relatively large and rounded in posterior outline (dorsal view). First upper incisor usually with at least a trace of a secondary cusp; anterointernal cingular cusp of P* absent; molariform teeth robust. MEASUREMENTS: See tables 10, 16. Comparisons: Bats of the race P. t. ingens are the most reddish and the largest of P. townsendii. From P. t. pallescens, the only geographically adjacent race of this species, ingens is distinguished by darker, more orange or reddish coloration, average larger size, relatively larger auditory bullae, more inflated rostrum, relatively more robust molariform teeth, and more frequent development of a secondary cusp on the first upper incisor. For comparison with P. ¢. virginianus see account of that sub- species (p. 202). Remarks: The Ozark form is similar to both P. t. virginianus to the eastward and P. t. pallescens to the westward. Specimens of P. t. pallescens from western Oklahoma and south-central Kansas approach P. ¢. ingens in size and coloration, although they are more like typical P. t. pallescens. SPECIMENS EXAMINED: A total of 18 from the following U.S. localities: ArKANsas: Washington County: Basset Cave, near Hicks, ls (UAZ); Devil’s Icebox, Devil’s Den State Park, 25 miles southwest of Fayetteville, 2s (CNHM), 9s (UAZ), Is (USNM), 1s (GF); Hewlitt Cave, 12 miles west of Fayetteville, 2s (UAZ), 1s (USNM). Missouri: Stone County: No exact locality, la (AMNH). Plecotus townsendii pallescens Miller Synotus macrotis H. Allen, 1864, p. 68. (Part.) Synotus townsendi H. Allen, 1864, p. 65. Clorynorhinus] macrotis H. Allen, 1865, p. 174. (Part.) Clorynorhinus] townsendi H. Allen, 1865, p. 175. Corynorhinus macrotis pallescens Miller, 1897, p. 52. Corynorhinus macrotis intermedius H. W. Grinnell, 1914, p. 320. (Part.) Corynorhinus megalotis megalotis G. M. Allen, 1916, p. 338. (Part.) Corynorhinus megalotis pallescens G. M. Allen, 1916, p. 341. Corynorhinus rafinesquii pallescens H. W. Grinnell, 1918, p. 340. Plecotus rafinesquii pallescens Blair, 1952, p. 96. Corynorhinus tlownsendii] pallescens Handley, 1955e, p. 147. Hototrypr: USNM (Biol. Surv. Coll.) 66534; adult female, skin and skull (crushed); collected 3 August 1894 by A. K. Fisher; Keam Canyon, Navajo County, Ariz.; collector’s No. 1715. DistripuTIon: Western United States, northwestern Mexico, and southwestern Canada, including parts of the Great Plains, Rocky AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 191 Mountains, Great Basin, Mohave and Colorado Deserts, ete., but excluding the northwestern coast region (fig. 22). North to Stanley and Harding Counties, S. Dak.; Powder River and Yellowstone Counties, Mont.; Yellowstone National Park, Wyo.; Riske Creek and Williams River, British Columbia. West to Riske Creek and Williams River, British Columbia; Okanogan and Yakima Counties, Wash.; Harney County, Oreg.; Siskiyou, Tehama, Placer, Tulare, and Kern Counties, Calif., and the coast and Channel Islands of California south of Point Conception. South to San Diego and Imperial Counties, Calif.; northern Baja California, northern Sonora, and northern Chihuahua, Mexico; Dona Ana County, N. Mex.; Culberson, Presidio, Brewster, Val Verde, and Edwards Counties, Tex. East to Val Verde and Edwards Counties, Tex.; Eddy County, N. Mex.; Cimarron County, Okla.; El Paso, Boulder, and Larimer Counties, Colo.; Custer and Stanley Counties, S. Dak. An appar- ently isolated population inhabits the gypsum cave region in south- central Kansas, central Oklahoma, and north-central Texas (speci- mens from Barber and Comanche Counties, Kans., south to Garza County, Tex. Zonal distribution: Most numerous in Upper Sonoran and Transition zones, but also occurs at the upper edge of the Lower Sonoran and the lower edge of the Canadian. Altitudinal distribu- tion: Sea level (possibly below sea level in southern California) to 9,600 feet. Description: Adult coloration: Mass effect of upperparts averages between Sayal Brown and Cinnamon; hair bases Light Cinnamon- Drab to Benzo Brown. Hair bases of underparts average between Fawn Color and Benzo Brown; tips between Light Pinkish Cinnamon and Pinkish Buff. Distinction between bases and tips of hairs usually everywhere slight. Immature coloration: Mass effect of upperparts between Drab and Cinnamon-Drab; hair bases slightly grayer. Hair tips of underparts “dirty” white; bases Benzo Brown to Light Mouse Gray. Size averages medium for the subgenus; forearm averages relatively long; skull relatively light in construction; rostrum averages relatively long, not particularly depressed, and not inflated; anterior nares average relatively small and angular in posterior outline (dorsal view). Canine relatively strong; secondary cusp on I! usually absent; anterointernal cingular cusp of P* frequent. MEASUREMENTS: See tables 11, 17. Comparisons: In coloration of fur, membranes, and ears P. t. pallescens is the palest and most yellowish known population of the species. For comparison with related subspecies see accounts of P. ft. australis (p. 187), P. ¢. ingens (p. 190), and P. t. townsendii (p. 198). 497256—59 7 192 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Remarks: There are four centers of saturate coloration in P. townsendii: (1) the central Appalachians; (2) the Ozark Plateau; (3) the Pacific Northwest; and (4) to a lesser degree, north-central Mexico. Between the three latter centers is a pale-colored population (P. t. pallescens) which exhibits maximum pallor and yellowness in the area extending from southeastern California and central Arizona northeastward to Wyoming, southeastern Montana and southwestern South Dakota. The extreme in pallor is found in the northeastern and southwestern parts of this belt. ‘The very palest specimens that I have seen come from southeastern California. Southward, eastward, and westward from the pallid belt there is a gradual and progressive darkening of pelage toward the saturate centers (fig. 22). Populations inhabiting the northern flanks of the Sierra Madre Occidental in northern Sonora and adjacent parts of Arizona are somewhat darker than populations of central and northern Arizona, but are much paler than P. mexicanus which is at the northwestern limit of its range in the same region. New Mexican specimens are but slightly darker and less yellow than the typical coloration of pallescens. Specimens from Oklahoma and Kansas are clearly intermediate between pallescens and the Ozark form, there being considerable variation in color. The series as a whole, however, is nearer pallescens. Most Texas (Big Bend) specimens, while not appreciably darker, are much less yellowish than typical pallescens. One specimen is darker and resembles more southerly populations called P. t. australis. Proceeding westward from the pallid belt, increasing darkness of coloration is encountered as the range of the dark-colored north- western coast population of P. townsendii is approached. The zone of intergradation between pale-colored and dark-colored populations is broad and includes the coast region of northern and central California; much of the remainder of California east of the Coast Range, but excepting the southern deserts; northwestern Nevada; Idaho; eastern Oregon; eastern Washington; and south-central British Columbia. Within this zone there is considerable individual variation in dorsal coloration, shades of yellowish brown and grayish brown being most common, but reddish brown individuals also occurring. Tone is very variable throughout the zone, the range in some samples almost bridging the gap between the pale and dark extremes of the north- western coast and the pallid belt. Various authors (among them, H. Grinnell, 1914, p. 320; Whitlow and Hall, 1933, p. 245; Hall, 1946, p. 160; and Dalquest, 1947, p. 20) have regarded the populations of this region as being subspecifically distinct from townsendiz and pallescens. The appropriate name, “intermedius” H. W. Grinnell, is available for this population. AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 193 Dalquest (1947, p. 20) suggested that this intergrading population probably developed intermediate characters in response to the nature of its environment—intermediate between the humid, forested coast and the arid, treeless deserts, and further postulated that genetic intergradation was not necessarily implied. If this were not an intergrading population I would expect to find constant adaptive characters developed in some portion of its geographic range. How- ever, in examining specimens from all portions of the range assigned to ‘“Ontermedius,” I have failed to find such a condition. A series of 25 specimens from Mission San Jose, Alameda County, Calif., when arranged in order from pale to dark, quite effectively bridges the color gap between pallescens and townsendii; the average is nearest townsendiz. Among 14 specimens from Tulare County, Calif., are three as pale as pallescens, two as dark as townsendii (al- though more reddish), and nine that are intermediate; the average is nearest pallescens. In a series of 16 specimens from Pyramid Lake, Nev., the palest individuals are indistinguishable from typical palles- cens, while the darkest, without reservation, could be called townsendii; the average is nearest pallescens. Six of seven from Malheur County, Oreg., are indistinguishable from typical pallescens, while one is inter- mediate but nearer pallescens. In a series of three specimens from Boulder Cave, Kittitas County, Wash., one is as dark as typical townsendti, while the others are somewhat paler, but nevertheless nearer townsendit. Whitlow and Hall (1933, p. 246) regarded a large series from the Pocatello Region of Idaho as intermediate. Similarly, there is intergradation between pale-colored and dark- colored populations in cranial characteristics. This is best seen in the relative stoutness of the rostrum (normally stout in dark-colored northwestern coast populations, normally less stout in pale-colored interior populations). Within the zone of intergradation, stoutness of the rostrum can not be correlated with coloration: Some pale- colored individuals have the rostrum very stout; some dark-colored individuals have the rostrum rather frail. From the specimens and information available to me, it does not appear that there is a population with constant morphological char- acters that could justifiably bear the name ‘‘intermedius.”” The fact that intergradation between P. t. townsendit and P. t. pallescens occurs over an extensive geographic area does not make the application of the name “intermedius” to the intermediate population more valid. The ideal in mammalian systematics is to avoid application of special names to geographically and genetically intermediate populations. The use of the name ‘‘intermedius”’ is clearly in violation of this prin- ciple, and the name is best relegated to synonymy. 194 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 SPECIMENS EXAMINED: A total of 313, from the following localities: MEXICO: Cuinvuaunua: Tinaja de Ponce, 2,600 feet, Sierra de Ponce, 12 miles southwest of Santa Helena, 16as (USNM). Sonora: Santa Maria Mine, El Tigre Mts., 3a (UMMZ); Pilares, la (UMMZ). UNITED STATES: Catirornia: Imperial County: Potholes, la (USNM); 6 miles north of Potholes, la (MCZ). Inyo County: Lone Pine, Alabama Hills, 4as (MCZ); Owen’s Lake, la (USNM); Owen’s Valley, 1a (USNM). Riverside County: 2 miles west of Red Mountain Lookout, 2s (STPM), 2s (USNM); River- side Mts., 2s (LSU). San Bernardino County: ‘‘Manvel” or “Marvel,” la (USNM); Eagle Pass, 12 miles southwest of Needles, 1s (LSU); Oro Grande, 2s (USNM); Vidal (Alice Mine), 4a (USNM); 6 miles south of Vidal, 1s (LSU). San Diego County: Dulzura, la (USNM); El Monte Oaks Park, la (CNHM); Pine Valley, la (USNM); Vallecito Stage Station, Is (CNHM). Shasta County: Fort Creek, la (USNM). Siskiyou County: Lava Cave, 5 miles southwest of Tule Lake, ls (USNM). Tulare County: 4 miles southeast of Porterville, 550 feet, 10s (AMNH); 10 miles east of Porterville, ls (AMNH); 4 miles east-south- east of White River, 1,700 feet, 38s (AMNH). Orecon: Malheur County: 15 miles south-southwest of Carol, 17as (USNM); Malheur Cave, 20 miles east of Malheur Lake, 1s (USNM). Wasuineton: Okanogan County: Okanogan High- lands, 15 miles east of Tonasket, ls (MCZ). Ipano: Bannock County: Portneuf River, 3 miles northwest of Inkom, lbs (USNM); Chinks Peak, 1.5 miles southeast of Pocatello, lbs (USNM). Butte County: Craters of the Moon National Monu- ment, Is (USNM). Nevapa: Churchill County: Fallon, is (USNM). Mineral County: 1 mile northwest of Rawhide, 1s (UI). Washoe County: Sutcliffe, 3,700 feet, ls (AMNH); The Needles (The Pinnacles), 3,900 feet, north end of Pyramid Lake, 35as (USNM). Utanw: Cache County: Logan Canyon, 15 miles above Logan, la (MCZ), 6a (USNM). No eract locality: la (USNM). Arizona: Cochise County: Chiricahua Mts., la (USNM); Fort Huachuca, 3a (USNM); 8 miles west of Fort Huachuca, 2s (UI); 11 miles south of Fort Huachuca, Is (UI); Ash Canyon, 19 miles south of Fort Huachuca, 1s (UI); Carr Canyon, 7,200 feet, Huachuca Mts., 4a (MCZ), 3s (UI); Miller Canyon, Huachuca Mts., 3a (MCZ); Montezuma Canyon, 5,300 feet, Huachuca Mts., 4a (MCZ); Ramsey Canyon, Huachuca Mts., 2a (MCZ); Huachuca Mts., ls (MCZ). Graham County: Ash Creek, 4,200 feet, Graham Mts. (Pinalino Mts.), ls (USNM). Maricopa County: Roosevelt [Bumblebee Creek, below Roosevelt Dam], 2,300 feet, 1s (USNM); Christmas Mine, 3,000 feet, 5 miles southwest of Roosevelt, ls (USNM). Mohave County: Oatman, 6as (MCZ); Rampart Cave, 2 miles southeast of Pierce’s Ferry, Hoover Dam National Recreational Area, ls (USNM). Navajo County: Keam Canyon, ls (USNM). Pima County: 2 miles northeast of Arivaca, 4,000 feet, 1ls (AMNH); Las Guijas Mts., north slope, 7 miles north-northwest of Arivaca, 5s (AMNH); Las Guijas, about 10 miles north-northwest of Arivaca, la (USNM); Santa Catalina Mts., 3a (AMNH); Colossal Cave, 28 miles southeast of Tucson, 2s (USNM). Pinal County: No exact locality, ls (AMNH). Santa Cruz County: Oro Blanco Mts., 4,600 feet, 12a (MCZ); Patagonia Mts., 3a (MCZ); McCleary’s Ranch, Santa Rita Mts., ls (USNM). Yavapai County: Camp Verde, 3,200 feet, Is (USNM), Is (AMNH); Montezuma Well, 3,500 feet, 6as (USNM); Prescott, 1s (AMNH); Turkey Creek [east slope of Bradshaw Mts., 7 miles northeast of Crown King], 3,400 feet, Is (USNM). New Mexico: Dona Ana County: San Andreas Mts., 5,600 feet, 35 miles northeast of Las Cruces, 5s (USNM). Eddy County: Carlsbad, 1s (USNM); McKitterick Cave, 20 miles west of Carlsbad, 1s (USNM); Carlsbad Caverns, 4s (CC). Socorro County: Socorro, Is (USNM). Texas: Brewster County: West slope of Emory Peak, 7,100 feet, Chisos Mts., 4s AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 195 (UMMZ); Kibbe Spring, 5,700 feet, Chisos Mts., 1s (CNHM); Pine Canyon, 4,700 feet, Chisos Mts., 1s (UMMZ); Johnson Ranch, la (USNM); Viviani Mines, Mariscal Mts., Is (TSDH). Garza County: Post, 1s (TT). Val Verde County: East Painted Cave, northwest of Del Rio, la (USNM); Langtry, 1a (USNM). Oxtanoma: Comanche County: Wichita Mountains National Wildlife Refuge, 3s (USNM). Woods County: Alva, 1a (USNM); no exact locality, 2b (MCZ). Woodward County: Alabaster Cave, 2s (CNHM); 6 miles southwest of Freedom, la (USNM). Kansas: Barber County: Sun City, 2s (USNM). Wro- MING: Big Horn County: 25 miles northeast of Greybull, 3a (AMNH). Crook County: Sand Creek, 3,750 feet, Black Hills, 10s (USNM). Yellowstone National Park: Devil’s Kitchen, Mammoth Hot Springs, 6as (USNM). Montana: Powder River County: Moorhead, 24s (USNM). Yellowstone County: 5 miles west of Billings, la (CNHM). Soutra Daxora: Custer County: Hell Canyon, 13 miles west of Custer, 7s (USN M); 18 miles southwest of Custer, 1s (USNM). Penning- ton County: Mouth of Spring Creek, Cheyenne River, 3s (AMNH). County un- certain: Crowfeet [=Crow Peak, Lawrence County?], Black Hills, 7a (AMNH). ADDITIONAL RECORDS: The following records probably refer to this form: MEXICO: Basa Canirornia: No exact locality (Pearson, et al., 1952, p. 273). CuIHUAHUA: Casas Grandes (Mdlaga, 1953, in litt.). Sonora: Sdric (Burt, 1938, p. 26). UNITED STATES: Caurrornia: El Dorado County: No exact locality (Taylor, 1919, p. 86). Imperial County: Palo Verde (H. W. Grinnell, 1918, p. 348). Inyo County: Mountain Springs Canyon, 5,500 feet, Argus Mts. (Dalquest, 1947, p. 19); 4.5 miles southwest of Bishop, 5,200 feet, and 4 miles south-southeast of Bishop, 4,700 feet (Dalquest, 1947, p. 19). Kern County: Old Fort Tejon, near Lebec (Dalquest and Ramage, 1946, p. 62); Red Rock Canyon (Dalquest, 1947, p. 19); Weldon (Dalquest, 1947, p. 20). Lassen County: Near Wendel (Dalquest, 1947, p. 20). Los Angeles County: Johnson’s Harbor, Santa Catalina Island (H. W. Grinnell, 1914, p. 320). Placer County: Auburn, 1,300 feet (H. W. Grinnell, 1914, p. 320); Pioneer Cave (H. W. Grinnell, 1914, p. 320). Riverside County: Hemet Peak, 6,500 feet, San Jacinto Mts., 2 miles northeast of Kenworthy (Grinnell and Swarth, 1913, p. 379); near Whitewater (H. W. Grinnell, 1918, p. 343). San Bernardino County: 5 miles southwest of Ivanpah, 4,500 feet (Dalquest, 1947, p. 19); Horse Spring, 2,700 feet, Kingston Range (Dalquest, 1947, p. 19); Mitchell’s (Johnson, et al., 1948, p. 343). San Diego County: One-half mile west of Banner (Frum, 1954, in litt.); Excondido (Dalquest, 1947, p. 19); Julian (H. W. Grinnell, 1918, p. 343); Oak Grove (Frum, 1954, in litt.); San Diego (Stephens, 1906, p. 265); Suncrest (Mitchell, 1956, p. 444); Vallecito (H. W. Grinnell, 1918, p. 348); 1.5 miles northwest of Vallecito (Dalquest, 1947, p. 19). Santa Barbara County: Santa Cruz Island (Pearson, 1951, p. 366). Shasta County: Old Station, 4,300 feet (Pearson, et al., 1952, p. 277). Siskiyou County: Lava Beds National Monu- ment, 4,800 feet (Pearson, et al., 1952, p. 278). Tehama County: Mouth of Battle Creek, near Bloody Island, 350 feet (Dalquest, 1947, p. 20). Ormcon: Harney County: Roaring Springs Cave, 80 miles south of Burns (Cressman and Reed, 1938, p. 248). Umatilla County: 5 miles east of Milton (Booth, 1945, p. 26). Wallowa County: Grande Ronde Canyon, [12 miles northeast of] Paradise (Bailey, 1936, p. 388). Wasurneton: Spokane County: 10 miles north of Spokane (Svihla, 1938, p.18). Yakima County: Selah (Dalquest, 1948, p. 164). IpaHo: Bannock County: 3-4 miles east of Pocatello, 5,000 feet (Whitlow and Hall, 1933, p. 243); Schutt’s Mine, 6,300 feet, 9 miles east of Pocatello (Whitlow and Hall, 1933, p. 243); 1 mile east of Portneuf, 4,500 feet (Whitlow and Hall, 1933, p. 248). Bingham 196 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 County: Blackfoot, 4,500 feet (Whitlow and Hall, 1938, p. 246). Bonner County: Deer Island, Lake Pend Oreille, and near Lakeview (Jones, 1948, p. 416). Nevapa: Churchill County: 9 miles north of Eastgate (Alcorn, 1944, p. 309); 10 miles southeast of Fallon (Hall, 1946, p. 159); 10 miles south and 5 miles west of Fallon, 4,300 feet (Hall, 1946, p. 162); 4.5 miles east of Stillwater, 4,000 feet (Hall, 1946, p. 160). Clark County: 7 miles east of Las Vegas (Burt, 1934, p. 397). Esmeralda County: Chiatovich Ranch, 4,850-4,900 feet (Hall, 1946, p. 162); 1 mile southeast of Dyer Ranch, 5,300 feet (Hall, 1946, p. 160). Lander County: one-quarter mile west-northwest of Austin (Alcorn, 1944, p. 309). Lyon County: 2 miles southwest of Pine Grove, 7,250 feet (Hall, 1946, p. 160); near Ramsey (Alcorn, 1944, p. 309); Muriel Bee Mine, 5,800 feet, 4 miles west of Wichman (Hall, 1946, p. 159); 9 miles east and 2 miles north of Yerington, 4,700 feet (Hall, 1946, p. 159); Bluestone Mine, 5,200 feet, 3.5 miles southwest of Yerington (Hall, 1946, p. 159). Mineral County: Fletcher, 6,100 feet (Frum, 1954, in litt.) ; Stan- moore Mine, about 7,000 feet, Lapon Canyon, Mount Grant (Hall, 1946, p. 159). Nye County: Amargosa River, 3,400-3,500 feet, 3.5 miles northeast of Beatty (Hall, 1946, p. 162); Hot Creek Range, 1 mile west of Hot Creek (Hall, 1946, p. 162); Springdale, north end of Oasis Valley (Davis, 1939, p. 124). Washoe County: 10 miles north-northwest of Deep Hole, 5,150 feet (Hall, 1946, p. 161); near Olinghouse (Alcorn, 1944, p. 309); Horse Canyon, 5,800 feet, Pahrum Peak (Hall, 1946, p. 161); 1 mile southwest of Pyramid Lake (Hall, 1946, p. 162); Smoke Creek, 9 miles east of California boundary, 3,900 feet (Hall, 1946, p. 162); 2 miles north of Sparks (Alcorn, 1944, p. 309). White Pine County: Lehman Cave, 7,200 feet (Hall, 1946, p. 162). Utan: Beaver County: Fort Beaver, 5,900 feet (Long, 1940, p. 172). Carbon County: Range Creek (Hardy, 1941, p. 293); Sun- nyside (Hardy, 1941, p. 293). Emery County: Horse Creek Canyon (Hardy, 1941, p. 293). Grand County: 4 miles north of Thompsons (Krutzsch and Heppenstall, 1955, p. 127); Post Canyon, Book Cliffs, 8,200 feet, 75 miles south of Ouray (Krutzsch and Heppenstall, 1955, p. 127). Kane County: 4 miles north of Kanab (Hardy, 1941, p. 293). San Juan County: Bluff, 3,300 feet (Hardy, 1941, p. 293). Sanpete County: Pete Canyon, 5,800 feet, west of Wales (Hardy, 1941, p. 293). Tooele County: Goldhill (Durrant, et al., 1955, p. 72). Uintah County: 1 mile southeast of Ouray, 4,700 feet (Durrant, 1952, p. 59). Utah County: Rock Can- yon, near Provo (Biol. Surv. files); east of Springville (Hardy, 1941, p. 293). Washington County: Apex Mine (Hardy, 1941, p. 293); Bloomington Cavern (Hardy, 1941, p. 293); Mineral Mountain (Hardy, 1941, p. 293); Zion National Park (Hardy, 1941, p. 293). Weber County: South fork of Ogden River (Durrant, et al., 1955, p. 72). Anizona: Cochise County: Portal (Cahalane, 1939, p. 422). Coconino County: Grand Canyon National Park (Hearst Ranch, Grandview, and Pasture Wash Ranger Station) (Hoffmeister, 1955, p. 5). Mohave County: Virgin Narrows, northeast of Littlefield (Hardy, 1949, p. 434). Santa Cruz County: Peiia Blanca Spring (Campbell, 1934, p. 242). Yavapai County: Martinez Creek, 7 miles southwest of Yarnell (Hatfield, 1942, p. 148). New Mexico: Grant County: Mule Creek (Bailey, 1931, p. 381). Santa Fe County: Santa Fe (H. Allen, 1864, p. 65). Texas: Brewster County: Maravillas Canyon, east of Black Gap (Tamsitt, 1954, p. 46) ; southeast slope of Mariscal Mountain, 2,800 feet (Borell and Bryant, 1942, p. 10). Culberson County: Bell Creek, 5,300 feet, 7 miles north of Pine Springs (Davis and Robertson, 1944, p. 262); Upper Sloth Cave, west slope of Guadalupe Mts., 7,000 feet (Davis, 1940, p. 74). Hdwards County: Devil’s Sink- hole, 6.5 miles northeast of Rocksprings, 2,300 feet (White, 1948, p. 6). Harde- man County: Acme (Dalquest, 1954, in litt.) ; 3 miles southeast of Lazare (Dalquest, 1954, in litt.); Panther Cave, 10 miles southeast of Quanah (Blair, 1954, p. 242). Presidio County: Sierra Vieja (Blair and Miller, 1949, p. 76). Val Verde County: AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 197 Mouth of Pecos River (Blair, 1952, p. 96). Oxuanoma: Blaine County: Salt Creek Canyon (Blair, 1939, p. 102); 3 miles southeast of Southard (Blair, 1939, p. 102). Cimarron County: Tesequite Canyon [1.7 miles southeast of Kenton] (Glass, 1951, p. 26). Greer County: 3.5 miles north of Jester (Glass, 1955, p. 128). Harmon County: 3 miles west and 1 mile south of Reed (Glass, 1955, p. 128). Woods County: 2 miles west of Edith (Blair, 1939, p. 102); 6 miles northeast of Freedom (Blair, 1939, p. 102); Marehew Cave, one-half mile south of Oklahoma- Kansas boundary (Hibbard, 1934, p. 237). Woodward County: 10 miles south of Freedom (Blair, 1939, p. 102). Kansas: Barber County: Several caves 3 to 5 miles southwest of Aetna (Cockrum, 1952, p. 79; Frum, 1954, in litt.; Twente, 1955a, p. 379); several caves 2 to 18 miles south of Sun City (Cockrum, 1952, p. 79; Hibbard, 1933, p. 233; Twente, 1955a, p. 379). Comanche County: Several caves 4 to 6 miles west and northwest of Aetna (Cockrum, 1952, p. 79; Hibbard, 1934, p. 287; Twente, 1955a, p. 379). Conorapo: Boulder County: Boulder Canyon, 7,700 feet (Young, 1908, p. 407); Fourmile Canyon, 7,000 feet, near Crisman (Cary, 1911, p. 204); 12 miles south of Lyons (G. Allen, 1916, p. 341). El Paso County: 1 mile north of Glen Eyrie (near Colorado Springs) (Warren, 1942, p. 80). Gunnison County: Gothic, 9,600 feet (Findley and Negus, 1953, p. 237). Larimer County: Fort Collins (Cary, 1911, p. 204); no exact locality (Miller, 1897, p. 53). Las Animas County: Trinidad (Warren, 1906, p. 267). SoutH Dakota: Custer County: Jewel Cave National Monument (National Park Service Collection, Washington, D.C.). Harding County: Ludlow Cave Hills (Biol. Surv. files). Stanley County: White River (Biol. Surv. files). CANADA: British CotumBia: Adam’s River, northwest of Shuswap Lake (Anderson, 1946, p. 32); Creston, Kootenay River (Anderson, 1946, p. 32); Keremeos, Similkameen Valley (Anderson, 1946, p. 32); Riske Creek and Williams River (Cowan and Guiguet, 1956, p. 67). Plecotus townsendii townsendii Cooper Plecotus townsendii Cooper, 1837, p. 73, pl. 3, fig. 6. S[ynotus] townsendit Wagner, 1855, p. 720. Corinorhinus townsendi Dobson, 1875, p. 356. Plecotus (Corinorhinus) macrotis Dobson, 1878, p. 180. (Part.) Corynorhinus macrotis townsendii Miller, 1897, p. 53. Corynorhinus macrotis intermedius H. W. Grinnell,3 1914, p. 320. Corynorhinus megalotis townsendi G. M. Allen, 1916, p. 344. Corynorhinus rafinesquit townsendi H. W. Grinnell, 1918, p. 345. Corynorhinus townsendit townsendit Handley, 1955c, p. 147. Hoxrotyrz: Not known to be in existence. Type locality: ‘‘Co- lumbia River,” herein restricted to Fort Vancouver, Clark County, Wash. Distrisution: Coast region of the northwestern United States and southwestern Canada (fig. 22). North to Comox, Vancouver Island, British Columbia. South to Santa Barbara County, Calif. Inland to eastern flanks of Coast Range in south; to eastern flanks of Cascade Range in north. Zonal distribution: Transition and Upper Sonoran. 8 Holotype: MVZ No. 7753; adult female, skin and skull; collected 31 July 1909, by J. C. Hawver; Auburn, Placer County, Calif.; original No. 2387. 198 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Description: Adult coloration: Mass effect of upperparts in darkest individuals between Natal Brown and Bone Brown, with little distinction between bases and tips of hairs; mass effect in palest individuals between Vandyke Brown and Verona Brown, with hair bases considerably paler than the tips, about Benzo Brown. Hair of underparts Fuscous at base; darkest individuals have hair tips of throat and breast between Snuff Brown and Bister, those of the belly Light Pinkish Cinnamon; palest individuals have hair tips of entire underparts Light Pinkish Cinnamon. Immature coloration: Similar to the darkest adults or slightly darker. Size averages medium for subgenus; forearm averages relatively short. Construction of skull heavy; rostrum relatively long, inflated, and not depressed; anterior nares, viewed from above, usually rounded in posterior outline. Canine strong; first upper incisor frequently with trace of secondary cusp; P* usually with anterointernal cingular cusp. MEASUREMENTS: See tables 12, 18. Comparisons: P. t. townsendii is the darkest colored and shortest winged population of the species P. townsendii. Compared with P. t. pallescens, into which it grades to the east and south, P. t. town- sendii is darker, averages slightly larger, and has a more robust skull, heavier rostrum, and anterior nares that average relatively larger and more rounded in posterior outline. Remarks: The type locality of this form is not “Columbia River, Oregon” as has been assumed by many authors (e.g., Miller, 1897, p. 53; G. M. Allen, 1916, p. 344; Anderson, 1946, p. 33; Miller and Kellogg, 1955, p. 110). Bailey (1936, p. 387) and Dalquest (1948, p. 163) were correct in naming “Fort Vancouver, Washington” as the type locality. Cooper’s description (1837, p. 73) of Plecotus townsendit was based on three specimens which he stated had been obtained by J. K. Town- send on the Columbia River. In the appendix to the narrative of his journey to the Columbia, Townsend (1839, pp. 324, 325) mentioned the species as follows: [Plecotus Townsendii is the] So-capual of the Chinook Indians .... Inhabits the Columbia river district, rather common. Frequents the store houses attached to the forts, seldom emerging from them even at night. This, and a species of Vespertilio, (V. subulatus), which is even more numerous, are protected by the gentlemen of the Hudson’s Bay Company, for their services in destroying the dermestes which abound in their fur establishments.—Towns. In these sentences from Townsend’s narrative there are many clues to the whereabouts of the type locality of P. townsendit. First is the fact that the bat ‘Inhabits the Columbia river district.”” Next, “Frequents the store houses attached to the forts.” According to AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 199 his narrative, Townsend visited four Columbia River forts: Fort Walla-Walla, near the present site of Wallula, Washington, half a mile above the mouth of the Walla Walla River; Fort Vancouver, 6 miles above the mouth of the Willamette River, Clark County, Wash.; Fort William, on the southwest side of Sauvie Island, Multnomah County, Oreg.; and Fort George at Astoria, Clatsop County, Oreg. Fort William can be eliminated immediately, for it was an American establishment, built during Townsend’s visit. There the bats could not have been “protected by the gentlemen of the Hudson’s Bay Company.” ‘Townsend’s citation of a Chinook Indian name for the bat, ‘‘So-capual of the Chinook Indians,” eliminates Fort Walla-Walla, because the Chinooks normally did not occur above the cascades of the Columbia (Townsend, 1839, p. 220), although Townsend’s party did encounter a band at The Dalles (1839, p. 159). Furthermore, Cooper’s description agrees with the dark, coastal race of the bat, whereas a pallid form occurs in the vicinity of Fort Walla-Walla. Finally, Townsend’s description of Fort George (1839, p. 182) elimi- nates it as a possibility: We anchored off Fort George, as it is called, although perhaps it scarcely deserves the name of a fort, being composed of but one principal house of hewn boards, and a number of small Indian huts surrounding it, presenting the appearance, from a distance, of an ordinary small farm house with its appropriate outbuildings. Compare with this the statement, ‘frequents the store houses at- tached to the forts.’”’ Townsend described Fort Vancouver, where he had residence during his months on the Columbia, as follows (1839, pp. 170-172): The space comprised within the stoccade is an oblong square, of about one hundred, by two hundred and fifty feet. The houses built of logs and frame-work, to the number of ten or twelve, are ranged around in a quadrangular form . in the vicinity of the fort, are thirty or forty log huts . . . placed in rows, with broad lanes or streets between them, and the whole looks like a very neat and beautiful village. Fort Vancouver appears to be the logical choice for the restricted type locality of Plecotus townsendii Cooper. P. t. townsendii intergrades with the very differently colored P. t. pallescens over a wide area in central and northern California and northward between the Cascades and the Rockies. Allocation of specimens, especially in inadequate series, from much of this area to one race or the other is largely a matter of personal opinion. As a result, various authors have disagreed on just where the artificial boundary between the ranges of townsendii and pallescens should be set. Other authors have chosen to solve the problem by applying a subspecific name, intermedius, to populations of the intergrading area. For a discussion of this problem, see the remarks under P. t. pallescens (p. 192). 200 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM You. 110 Dark-colored populations, resembling those at the type locality probably occur only in the Coast Ranges and humid lowlands west of the Cascade Range from northern California northward to Vancouver Island. Progressive increase in pallor apparently takes place even as the western slopes of the Cascades are approached. ‘Thus, in the Willamette Valley in Oregon, specimens from Carver and Vida, at lower elevations, are darker than those from McKenzie Bridge a little further up-stream. On the eastern slopes of the Cascades, as at Boulder Cave, Wash., specimens average even paler, but are, never- theless, nearer townsendit than pallescens. A single specimen from Happy Camp, Siskiyou County, Calif., is paler than most other specimens identified as townsendii, but it is from an area where townsendii theoretically should occur, and on the supposition that a larger series would show the average to be nearer townsendit, it has been identified as that form. Samples from collecting stations in the lowlands and Coast Range south of San Francisco Bay are variable, showing intergradation with P. t. pallescens. From Santa Barbara County northward the samples average nearer P. t. townsendii in morphological characters. Plecotus appears to be absent from most parts of the Great Valley of California. SPECIMENS EXAMINED: A total of 83, from the following localities: UNITED STATES: Caurrornia: Alameda County: Mission San Jose, 25s (MVZ). Fresno County: New Jaria [-New Idria?], 1b (USNM). Marin County: Nicasio, ls (USNM). Monterey County: Stonewall Creek, 1,300 feet, 6.3 miles northeast of Soledad, 2s (MVZ). Napa County: Mount Veeder [1,950 feet], is (USNM). San Benito County: Bear Valley [The Pinnacles, near Cook, 2,000 feet], 2s (USNM); 4 miles west-northwest of Panoche, Is (MVZ). San Luis Obispo County: 5 miles south-southwest of Adelaida, 2,200 feet, 1s (MVZ); San Simeon, Ils (MVZ); 6.5 miles southeast of Shandon, 1s (MVZ). San Mateo County: 2.0 to 2.5 miles east of Pescadero, 2s (MVZ). Santa Clara County: Evergreen, 2s (MVZ); 2.25 miles northwest of San Felipe, 2s (MVZ). Santa Cruz County: 2 miles southwest of Brookdale, 1s (MVZ); Mouth of Meder Creek, 2s (MVZ); 2 to 3 miles east of Santa Cruz, 2s (MVZ). Siskiyou County: Happy Camp, ls (USNM). Orxaon: Clackamas County: Carver, 4s (CNHM), 3s (USNM). Curry County: Gold Beach, 5s (CNHM), Is (MCZ), 1a (USNM). Lane County: Creswell, 1a (USNM); McKenzie Bridge, 3s (USNM); Vida, 1s (USNM). Wasuineton: Kittitas County: Boulder Cave, Naches River, 43 miles northwest of Yakima, l4as (USNM). Thurston County: Olympia, 1s (USNM). CANADA: Britis CotumBia: Vancouver Island: Comox, 1s (USNM). ADDITIONAL RECORDS: The following records probably refer to this form: UNITED STATES: Caurirornia: Alameda County: 4 miles east-southeast of Mission San Jose (Dalquest, 1947, p. 20). Colusa County: 2.25 miles south- southeast of Wilbur Springs, 1,800 feet (Frum, 1954, in litt.). Humboldt County: Carlotta (Dickey, 1922, p. 116). Lake County: Long Valley (Dalquest,1947, p. 20); Lucerne (Frum, 1954, in litt.); 4 miles east of Upper Lake (Dalquest, AMERICAN BATS—-HANDLEY 201 1947, p. 20). Marin County: Inverness (Pearson, et al., 1952, p. 275); 1.3 miles southeast of Inverness (Frum, 1954, in litt.). Mendocino County: 1.5 miles north of Gualala (Dalquest, 1947, p. 20). Napa County: Aetna Springs (Pearson, et al., 1952, p. 275); one-half mile south of Angwin, 1,600 feet, and 1 mile south of Angwin, 1,500 feet (Dalquest, 1947, p. 20); 4 miles south of Calistoga (Dalquest, 1947, p. 20); near Knoxville, 2,000 feet (Pearson, et al., 1952, p. 279); Pope Creek, 8 miles northwest of Monticello (Dalquest, 1947, p. 20). San Benito County: Hernandez (H. W. Grinnell, 1914, p. 320). Sonoma County: 10 miles east of Stewart’s Point (Dalquest, 1947, p. 20). Orscon: Clackamas County: Clacka- mas (V. Bailey, field notes). Josephine County: Siskiyou Mts., Oregon Caves National Monument (Roest, 1951, p. 346). Lane County: Eugene (Bailey, 1936, p. 387). Multnomah County: Portland (Bailey, 1936, p. 387). WasHINGTON: Clallam County: Elwha River (Johnson and Johnson, 1952, p. 33). Clark County: Fort Vancouver (Bailey, 1936, p. 386). King County: Seattle (Dalquest, 1948, p. 163). Mason County: Lake Cushman (Dice, 1932, p. 48). Pierce County: Puyallup (Dalquest, 1938, p. 213). San Juan County: Blakeley Island (Dal- quest, 1948, p. 162); Friday Harbor (Dalquest, 1948, p. 161). County uncertain: Hood’s Canal (Johnson and Johnson, 1952, p. 33). CANADA: British Cotumpra: Nanaimo Bay, Vancouver Island (Anderson, 1946, p. 33); Newcastle Island (Anderson, 1946, p. 33). Plecotus townsendii virginianus Handley Corynorhinus macrotis A. H. Howell, 1909, p. 68. (Part.) Corynorhinus megalotis megalotis G. M. Allen, 1916, p. 338. (Part.) Corynorhinus rafinesquit Thomas, 1916, p. 127. (Part.) Corynorhinus townsendii virginianus Handley, 1955c, p. 148. Hoxtotyese: USNM 269163; adult male, skin and skull; collected 12 November 1939, by W. J. Stephenson; Schoolhouse Cave, 4.4 miles northeast of Riverton, 2,205 feet, Pendleton County, W. Va.; no collector’s number. Distrrisution: Central part of Appalachian Highlands in eastern Kentucky, western Virginia, and eastern West Virginia (fig. 23). North to Hardy, Grant, and Preston Counties, W. Va. West to Preston, Tucker, and Randolph Counties, W. Va. South to Ran- dolph and Pendleton Counties, W. Va. East to Pendleton and Hardy Counties, W. Va. Apparently isolated populations further south and west, in Tazewell County, Va., and Powell County, Ky. Zonal distribution, Transition. Altitudinal distribution, 1,700 to 3,500 feet. Descrietion: Adult coloration: Hair of upperparts about Benzo Brown at base; subterminal band orange-brown, tip dark brown; mass effect between Prout’s Brown and Bister. Hair of underparts between Light Vinaceous-Cinnamon and Light Pinkish Cinnamon distally, occasionally somewhat darker on throat and chin; bases, except of those hairs bordering membranes, Fuscous; border hairs monocolored. Distinction between tip and base of hair sharp on under- parts, poor on dorsum. Immature coloration: Hair of upperparts 202 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 between Natal Brown and Benzo Brown distally; bases slightly grayer, hardly distinguished from tips. Hair of underparts Mouse Gray at base, pale buff at tip; distinction between base and tip slight. Size averages medium for subgenus; forearm averages relatively long. Rostrum relatively long and not depressed; anterior nares (viewed from above) wide and rounded in posterior outline. First upper incisor usually without trace of secondary cusp. MEASUREMENTS: See tables 12, 18. Comparisons: Compared with P. ft. ingens, P. t. virginianus is more sooty dorsally and averages slightly smaller in all dimensions; the first upper incisor rarely has a trace of a secondary cusp; and the rostrum is less heavy and inflated. Remarks: The Appalachian populations (P. t. virginianus) appear to be isolated by no less than 600 miles from the nearest closely related populations (P. ¢. ingens) in the Ozark Highlands. Despite this separation, the two forms are not strikingly different, and although there is no possibility of demonstrating intergradation between them, they may be treated best as being conspecific. On the other hand, the Appalachian populations of P. townsendii are specifically distinct from P. rafinesquii, whose geographic range they overlap. This peculiar pattern of distribution, perhaps related to Pleistocene dis- turbances, is discussed in the section on history (p. 215). There is no obvious explanation for the limited and apparently discontinuous distribution of the populations within the bounds of the Appalachian Highlands. The species is relatively numerous, even the most abundant bat in some caves, in two adjacent drainage sys- tems in northeastern West Virginia. It has been found in at least 15 caves at the head of the Potomac River and in four caves at the head of the Cheat River. All of these caves are in limestone, in an area 30 miles wide and 40 miles long. Three other populations have been discovered away from this main body: One a few miles to the north in Preston County, W. Va. (Kellogg, 1937, p. 450), another 150 miles to the south-southwest in a limestone cavern in Tazewell County, Va. (Howell, 1909, p. 68; Mohr, 1933, p. 49), and the third in a cave 200 miles to the west-southwest in Powell County, Ky. (Barbour, 1957, p. 141). The intervening extensive limestone caverns, mostly well explored, in Pocahontas, Greenbrier, and Monroe Counties, W. Va., and in the Valley of Virginia do not seem to be occupied by the species. Isolation such as apparently exists among the Kentucky, Virginia, and West Virginia populations of this species favors differentiation. It is not surprising then that differentiation is evident. Virginia and Kentucky specimens average smaller than those from West Virginia. Kentucky and West Virginia specimens are similar in color to Virginia AMERICAN BATS—-HANDLEY 203 specimens obtained in 1908. However, specimens collected in Virginia in 1957 average considerably darker, more sooty, both dorsally and ventrally, than those collected recently in Kentucky and West Virginia or in the same Virginia cave fifty years earlier. They resemble typical P. t. townsendii in coloration. SPECIMENS EXAMINED: A total of 100, from the following U.S. localities: Kentucky: Powell County: Natural Bridge State Park, 2s (UK). Virerntia: Tazewell County: Burkes Garden, 3,200 feet, 9as (USNM). West VircInia: Grant County: 10 miles south of Petersburg, 3s (CM). Pendleton County: Cave Mountain Cave, 2,450 feet, 1.4 miles west of Brushy Run, llas (USNM); Hellhole, 2,200 feet, 3.6 miles northeast of Riverton, 5a (USNM); Hoffman School Cave, 2,175 feet, 4.9 miles south-southwest of Franklin, 2s (USNM); Schoolhouse Cave, 2,205 feet, 4.4 miles northeast of Riverton, 3las (USNM); ‘“‘Smokehole” [=Smoke- hole Cave, 1,730 feet, 1.9 miles west-northwest of Brushy Run?], 29abs (AMNH); “Cave Rock Cave, Smokehole” [=Cave Mountain Cave, 2,450 feet, 1.4 miles west of Brushy Run?], 8s (AMNH). ADDITIONAL RECORDS: The following records probably refer to this form: Kentucky: Rowan County: Carter Caves (Welter and Sollberger, 1939, p. 79). West VirGinia: Grant County: Klines Gap Cave, 1,700 feet, 4 miles southwest of Maysville (Frum, 1954, in litt.); Peacock Cave, 1,755 feet, 7.6 miles southwest of Petersburg (Fowler, 1941a, p. 35) ; Petersburg (McKeever, 1952, p. 47). Hardy County: Baker’s Cave, near Durgon [apparently not the ‘‘Baker Cave” of Davies, 1949, p. 139] (Wilson, 1946, p. 86). Pendleton County: Mill Run Cave, 1,800 feet, one-half mile southeast of Kline (Frum, 1954, in litt.); Seneca Caverns, 2,200 feet, 3 miles northeast of Riverton (Reese, 1934, p. 47); Sinnit Cave, 2,250 feet, one-quarter mile northwest of Moyers (Frum, 1954, in litt.) ; Thompson Cave, 2,350 feet, 1.5 miles east-southeast of Riverton (Frum, 1954, in litt.) [=5.6 miles north-northeast of Circleville, 2,350 feet (McKeever, 1952, p. 47)?]; Torys Cave, 2,000 feet, 5 miles southwest of Franklin (Frum, 1954, in litt.) [=Tory’s Cave, 10 miles south of Franklin (Barbour, 1951b, p. 369)?]; Trout Cave, 5 miles southwest of Franklin (Fowler, 1941b, p. 47). Preston County: No exact locality (Kellogg, 1937, p. 450; Barbour, 195la, p. 50). Randolph County: 6.7 miles east-northeast of Glady, 3,500 feet (McKeever, 1952, p. 47); The Sinks, Cave No. 1, 3,500 feet, one-half mile west of Osceola (Reese, 1934, p.47). Tucker County: Arbegast Cave, 2,600 feet, 6 miles southeast of Hendricks (Frum, 1954, in litt.); Cave Hollow Cave, 2,400 feet, 5 miles southeast of Hendricks (Frum, 1954, in litt.). INCERTAE SEDIS Vespertilio maugei Desmarest Vespertilio mauget Desmarest, 1819, p. 480. Plecotus Maugei Lesson, 1827, p. 96. Vespertilio (Plecotus) Maugei Cooper, 1837, p. 71. Synotus Maugei Wagner, 1855, p. 719. Vespertilio mauget H. E. Anthony, 1916, p. 360. Houotyrr: From Puerto Rico. Collected by Maugé. The pres- ent disposition of the holotype is unknown. Some of Desmarest’s 204. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM You. 110 types are in the Paris Museum, but Rode (1941) did not list Vesper- tilio maugei in his catalog of the type specimens of Chiroptera in the Paris Museum. Distrispution: ‘Puerto Rico.” Description: Following is my translation of Desmarest’s (1819, p. 480) description: Vespertilio maugei, new species. This bat, brought back from Puerto Rico by the late Maugé, is of medium size and approaches, in its physiognomy, the barbastelle, notably by the distinguishing character of the union of the ears at their internal bases. Its pelage is long, silky, of a blackish brown above, lighter beneath, particularly in the region near the interfemoral membrane, where it becomes almost white; its tail is nearly as long as the body; its membranes are of a dark gray. Its mouth is provided with four upper incisors of which the two inner are the largest, separated from one another and bifurcate, the exterior being simple; the six lower incisors overlap one another and have three lobes, and medium-sized canines are very closely followed by the molars. The muzzle is short, slender, pointed, and forms, with the ears, a right angle; the nose is rather broad, that is to say, that the nostrils are separated by a cartilage in the form of a plate, which resembles somewhat a lyre; the ears are large, their extremity is rounded, their exterior border notched, with a longitudinal fold provided with very dense and very noticeable hairs; the tragi are pointed and do not reach half the height of the ears; the eyes are small and placed at the base of the latter. Desmarest (1820, p. 145) modified this description slightly the fol- lowing year. My translation of the most significant portions of the new description is as follows: Ears very large, united, notched exteriorly near the tip . .. Dimensions, a little larger than the barbastelle. . . .” Remarks: For the early 19th century these are surprisingly detailed descriptions. However, the bat described is quite unlike any bat known to occur in the West Indies. Eptesicus is the only vespertil- ionid that has subsequently been collected on Puerto Rico, and Myotis, Nycticeius, and Lasiurus are the only other vespertilionid genera recorded from the West Indies. Vespertilio maugei has been overlooked or ignored by most authors. Those who have considered it (see synonymy, p. 203) have thought it to be a species of Plecotus. Plecotus has not been collected subse- quently in the West Indies, however, and no skeletal remains of Plecotus have been recognized in the sub-Recent bone deposits that are abundant in West Indian caves. Anthony (1918, p. 360) suggested that Maugé’s specimen actually was a Plecotus which had been obtained in the United States and was attributed to Puerto Rico by mistake. It is true that Desmarest’s descriptions agree in some details with Plecotus, but there are many discrepancies: Coloration of the underparts is wrong, the canines AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 205 are not “very closely followed by the molars,” the nostrils are not separated by a lyre-shaped plate, and the auricles are not notched on their exterior borders. There is a possibility that the description of V. mauget is a com- posite. The dental characters could apply to Eptesicus. Externally, the West Indian phyllostomid Macrotus waterhousi: agrees fairly well with Desmarest’s description. Although its tail is a trifle short, and its nose leaf can hardly be said to be “‘lyre-shaped,” it nevertheless has unusually large ears, connected at their internal bases, and its coloration exactly matches Desmarest’s description. On the other hand, with regard to its dentition, Macrotus bears no resemblance whatsoever to the description of “V. mauger.”’ It seems probable that the bat Desmarest described was the Eurasian Barbastella, with which his descriptions agree in all details. In all probability the specimen did not originate in Puerto Rico or elsewhere in the Western Hemisphere. Consequently, the name Vespertilio maugei should be placed in the synonymy of Barba- stella and should be disassociated from Plecotus and the American fauna. History PALEONTOLOGICAL RECORD CHIROPTERA The paleontological record is so fragmentary for bats that few conclusions can be drawn from it. Crania and upper dentitions are disappointingly rare in fossil bat material. The commonest remains are mandibles or long bones, neither of which, when isolated and fragmentary, are very satisfactory for studies of evolution and rela- tionships or even for taxonomic classification. Paradoxically, the oldest known chiropteran remains—those of Archaconycteris, Palaeo- chiropteryz, and Cecilionycteris of the Middle Eocene—are also the best preserved. Complete dentitions and skeletons are intact, and even the outlines of the wing membranes can be traced (G. Allen, 1939, p. 177). Most of the work on fossil Chiroptera has been done in Europe. A majority of the named forms and a preponderance of the literature on the subject are from that region. Investigations conducted else- where, principally in China and in the United States are insignificant by comparison. Preglacial fissure and cave microfaunas have been virtually untouched outside of Europe. The European record indicates that the extinct families Archaeonyc- teridae and Palaeochiropterygidae occurred with some variety in Middle Eocene time. Rhinolophidae were numerous and predominant in Upper Eocene and Oligocene deposits. Species of Megadermatidae 206 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 and Emballonuridae were somewhat less numerous during the same period. The Vespertilionidae became abundant somewhat later. FAMILY VESPERTILIONIDAE According to Revilliod (1919, p. 94), the genus Stehlinia [= Nycter- obius Revilliod and Revilliodia Simpson (Handley, 1955a, p. 128)] of the Quercy fauna of the Upper Eocene or Lower Oligocene of Europe is the most ancient known vespertilionid. It has cranial characters of the Vespertilionidae, but is distinguished from modern genera by several primitive characters, including very elongated rostrum, rela- tively very long premolar series, and 2-rooted P!. It most closely resembles some of the small species of Myotis, which is generally con- ceded to be the most primitive living genus of the family. True Myotis appears for the first time in the Stampien and Aqui- tanien faunas of the Middle and Upper Oligocene of Europe [Myotis salodorensis Revilliod (1919, p. 94) and Myotis insignis von Meyer (Revilliod, 1922, p. 166)]. Other Myotis have been described from the Middle Miocene of Europe [Myotis antiquus Gaillard (1899, p. 8) and Myotis sancti-albani Viret (1951, p. 19)], and Myotis-like remains occur in Lower Miocene beds in Florida (Lawrence, 1943, p. 364). Some of the Recent species of Myotis (M. bechsteinn, M. mystacinus, and M. oxygnathus) were possibly derived by Pliocene or Lower Pleistocene time (e.g., see Heller, 1930, p. 154; Kormos, 1937, p. 338; and Kowalski, 1956, p. 331), although most late Tertiary and Quater- nary material has been described as now extinct species (e.g., see Heller, 1936, p. 113; Kormos, 1934, p. 306; Kowalski, 1956, p. 331; Sickenburg, 1939, p. 8; and Wettstein, 1923, p. 40). Another primitive vespertilionid genus, Miniopterus, is thought to have been recognizable as far back as the Miocene epoch (WM. fossilis, Zapfe, 1950, p. 60). The Lower Pliocene Mystipterus (Hall, 1930, p. 319) from Nevada, first supposed to be related to Miniopterus, subsequently has been shown to be an insectivore (Patterson and McGrew, 1937, p. 256). The oldest Eptesicus-like remains are from Lower Miocene beds of Florida (Lawrence, 1943, p. 367). Other Eptesicus-like genera, Samonycteris (Revilliod, 1919, p. 95) and Pareptesicus (Zapfe, 1950, p. 58), have been described from the Miocene of Europe. From the Upper Pliocene of Arizona comes Simonycteris (Stirton, 1931, p. 27), also possibly a relative of Eptesicus. The most ancient remains at- tributed to true H’ptescius are those discovered in the Pliocene or Lower Pleistocene of Hungary (Kormos, 1930a, p.41). Brown (1908, p. 174) regarded Middle Pleistocene material from the Conard Fissure of Arkansas as being only subspecifically distinct from the Recent Eptesicus fuscus. Gidley and Gazin (1938, p. 11), with more abundant 207 AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY (CUE SSGE) sPaeH one cou Q[¥OS DUTT] [ed1Z0}OaN “snjorajg Jo v1ouasqns Sutmoys yosul YUM ‘e1oued pruoliiiedsaa surOs Jo UOTNq!IsIp Jeo1so;ouoIYyS Jo sIvWIsyY—"SZ AUN \ Suvgs) NOITMW Ol | : 3N39031Vd eal and | A / rae SUV3A NOITTIN 02 i Me of “S 3N3903 i I ts po rs \ \ S903 - ye 7 oO f SNNIHHONAOD / a | STSALOANOIO / ay \. —_———. —t——— ViniHal ‘ { aN ee) } oe eS SUV3A NOITIIN ZI come / -StLOaW * an3909170 - ‘ 32 1 | I { \ SWuOS Ne SWu04 3nIN-SNdISalda we H “"s. | 3NIT-SILOAW A ~N 1 i ; \ Z ‘ l { { \ SUV3A. NOITTIN, 91 see Tas { SHUsLdOININ I \ 3N390IN ge ! ao Ns f / { | ” ak t i STESLOANOWWS =| | i H } y OMILYadS3A i Perea 1 oe se. SUV3A NOITHW ID ‘ x s : Vitaisveuve 3N390I1d 1 i ! a a ee é Ne snynisv1 1W3LIANOWIS ‘SNDIS31d3 SSS ee a ee ee : a ee | ee ee ee VAYAINS SuvV3A NOITNIW | 4N393YN 8 J3N3901SI91d 497256—59——8 208 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 material from the Pleistocene of Cumberland Cave, Md., agreed that the relationship of grandis to the Recent species is close but believed it to be sufficiently different to warrant specific separation. Records for Barbastella (Wettstein, 1931 p. 780), Lasiurus (Hibbard, 1950, p. 134), and Vespertilio (Kormos, 1934, p. 312) extend back at least to the Pliocene. Numerous other Recent vespertilionid genera have been identified in Pleistocene deposits. To recapitulate: The oldest recognizable vespertilionid was of Upper Eocene or Lower Oligocene age. The morphologically more primitive Recent genera emerged in the Oligocene and Miocene. Recent species of these genera were in some instances perhaps derived as early as the Pliocene, although fossil species of the same genera persisted into the Pleistocene (fig. 25). Genus Plecotus Vespertilio (Plecotus) grivensis Depéret Remains undoubtedly referable to Plecotus have been found only in Upper Pliocene (possibly actually Lower Pleistocene) and Pleisto- cene deposits. Records of greater antiquity are erroneous or question- able. The controversial Vespertilio (Plecotus) grivensis of Depéret (1892, p. 11, pl. 2) from the Vindobonien (Middle Miocene) fauna of Grive Saint-Alban, France,is a case in point. Depéret’s material consisted of two fragmentary mandibles. Gaillard (1899, p. 7) later reported a total of four mandible fragments from Grive Saint-Alban in the Museum of Lyon. All apparenty agreed with V. grivensis, but did not elucidate the unknown portions of the mandible. Depéret (loc. cit.) believed that the remains most closely resembled Plecotus, and to this opinion Wettstein (1931, p. 779) agreed. On the other hand, Gaillard (loc. cit.) preferred to leave the generic desig- nation questionable. When Revilliod (1922, p. 172) reviewed all the Tertiary Chiroptera, his conclusion was that Vespertilio grivensis was in actuality a Myotis. More recently, Viret (1951, p. 21) redescribed and figured the specimens (now totaling five fragments) of Vespertilio grivensis which were initially reported by Depéret and Gaillard. Viret argued con- vincingly that the type and one additional fragment should beregarded as Rhinolophus grivensis, while the third fragment proved to be Myotis sancti-albani, the fourth Sorex pusillus, and the fifth indeterminate. Plecotus crassidens Kormos Next in geologic age is the Pliocene or Lower Pleistocene Plecotus crassidens of Kormos (1930b, p. 238) from Hungary and Poland. Kormos did not figure the fragmentary mandible upon which he based the name, and there was nothing positive about his description. AMERICAN BATS—-HANDLEY 209 Subsequently, however, Kowalski (1956, p. 359, pl. 3) figured and described in detail ten maxillary and cranial frgaments which he had compared directly with Kormos’ type of P. crassidens. He character- ized P. crassidens as follows: RostRUM BROAD (much more so than in P. auritus), FLATTENED, AND WITH A MEDIAN DEPRESSION; intermaxil- lary notch broad and cordate; palate extends one molar breadth poster- ior to toothrows;LACHRYMAL [AND SUPRAORBITAL] REGIONS NOT RIDGED; P‘ labially broader and less obliquely placed than in P. auritus; molars larger and more massive than in P. auritus; coronoid process of man- dible distinctly pointed; angular process broad and blunt and deflected outward; P; smaller than P,; P, 2-rooted, subquadrate in basal cross- section, provided with strong cingulum, and not so high as Mi; Ms; talonid narrower than trigonid. Also apparent from Kowalski’s figures, although not stated in his description are the facts that the braincase bulges dorsally in the parietal region, and THE ZYGOMATIC ARCH IS NOT EXPANDED IN ITS MIDDLE THIRD (posterior third missing). The characters in larger type relate P. crassidens to the subgenus Corynorhinus, while the shape and 2-rooted condition of P, show an affinity to the subgenus Plecotus. On the basis of these specimens Kowalski (1956, p. 340) supposed that the North American Corynorhinus might be a relict of the Tegelien Interglacial of Europe (possibly equivalent to the Aftonian Inter- glacial of North America), analogous to the several species of the Tegelien flora, now extinct in Europe but persisting in North America. Plecotus abeli Wettstein Wettstein (1923, p. 39; 1931, p. 779) described abundant Pleistocene remains from the Drachenhéhle in Austria as belonging to a distinct species, Plecotus abeli, averaging slightly smaller than the Recent form and having the cusps of the lower molars not so high and sharp. Kowalski (1956, p. 361), judging from Wettstein’s descriptions, ven- tured the opinion that P. abeli was no more than subspecifically distinct from P. auritus. Plecotus auritus Linnaeus Most of the undoubted remains of Plecotus that have turned up in the Pleistocene and dubiously Upper Pliocene fissure and cave de- posits of Europe have been identified as Plecotus auritus, the Recent species now inhabiting Europe (e.g., see Heller, 1930, p. 154; 1936, p. 112; Kowalski, 1956, p. 361; and Sickenburg, 1939, p. 9). Corynorhinus alleganiensis Gidley and Gazin Corynorhinus alleganiensis from Cumberland Cave, Md. (Gidley, 1913, p. 96; Gidley and Gazin, 1933, p. 345; 1938, p. 12), is the best 210 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 known North American fossil Plecotus. The geologic age of this species cannot be determined stratigraphically, since the material upon which it is based is from a fissure type deposit. However, the, fauna associated with the bat remains is certainly Pleistocene in age and Gazin (in Gidley and Gazin, 1938, p. 7) concluded from the number of extinct forms present and from the difficulty encountered in identi- fying others as Recent that the Cumberland Cave fauna can hardly be considered Upper Pleistocene, and is more likely Middle Pleistocene in age. There is no reason to suppose that the bat remains were not deposited at the same time as the remainder of the Cumberland Cave fauna. P. alleganiensis was similar in many respects to (and possibly directly ancestral to) P. townsendii, the Plecotus occurring nearer than any other to Cumberland Cave today. It possessed the primitive characteristics of supraorbital ridge and lack of a sagittal crest. See pages 137-139 for a full description of P. alleganiensis. Corynorhinus tetralophodon Handley The other American Pleistocene species, C. tetralophodon, from San Josecito Cave, Nuevo Leén, Mexico, is known from a single skull. It was found in a cave deposit of indeterminable age, but judging from its similarity to Recent forms and from the associated fauna, it is probably Upper Pleistocene (Wisconsin) in age and younger than Plecotus alleganiensis. It differs from Recent forms in possession of a fourth commissure on M? and in failure of the temporal ridges to coalesce completely. Probably it was related most closely to P. townsendii, but possibly was not a direct ancestor of that species. See page 140 for a full description of P. tetralophodon. ORIGIN AND DISPERSAL OF EUDERMA AND PLECOTUS The paleontological record is so incomplete that a discussion of the origin and dispersal of Huderma and Plecotus necessarily must rely heavily upon speculation. However, with the historical record of other vespertilionid groups in mind, and with the evidence of present day geographic distribution of taxonomic characters in Huderma and Plecotus as a factual foundation, there is ground for speculation on the evolution of these genera. In the systematic section and in the pre- ceding paragraphs of this section the facts have been presented. The remainder of this section is devoted to an interpretation of them. Several factors govern the dispersal of bats. Of paramount im- portance are food supply and shelter. For insectivorous forms, such as Huderma and Plecotus, the vegetation controlling the distribution of the bat’s insect prey and the climate controlling the distribution of the vegetation are the ultimate critical factors in the bat’s dispersal AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 211 as far as food supply is concerned. For antisocial, nonmigratory, cool climate inhabitants, such as some Plecotus are, not only is the presence of caves suitable for hibernation essential, but the caves must be sufficiently abundant to allow a degree of privacy and isola- tion from other species of bats. Unfortunately, it is not possible to index all of these factors through time. Otherwise, a more satisfactory picture of the differentiation and dispersal of these bats might be drawn with less recourse to speculation. The present distribution of Huderma and Plecotus and their relative, Barbastella, coincides rather closely with the North Temperate zone. Thus, it may be assumed that tropical and boreal climates have served as barriers to their dispersal. The center of origin for the group may have been either Nearctic or Palearctic. Since distantly related primitive forms and closely related progressive forms occur in both regions, a hypothesis of multiple invasion is required to explain present distributions regardless of which region may have served as the center of origin. No paleontological record is available for the more primitive forms, so paleontology gives no hint of origin or an- cestry. If it be assumed that the area of most active differentiation and greatest elaboration of forms indicates the center of origin of a group of animals, and that the most advanced, most progressive, and most specialized form is to be found about the center of origin, while the most primitive, most conservative, and least progressive is to be found on the peripheries (Matthew, 1939, p. 32), then it must be reckoned that this group of bats originated in the Nearctic. ANCESTRAL FORMS It is probable that the ancestral forms were derived early in the Cenozoic, since the related living genus Myotis is recognizable at least as far back as Middle Oligocene. During the Eocene and Oligocene epochs, low relief of the northern continents and lack of climatic barriers permitted a moist temperate forest to extend from Greenland across northern America to Alaska, Siberia, northern Europe, and Spitzbergen. A land bridge at Bering Strait intermittently connected North America and Eurasia [indicated by strong Lower Eocene, Upper Eocene, and Lower Oligocene migrations of mammals (Simp- son, 1947, p. 625)]. The temperate forest of this region was char- acterized by redwood (Sequoia), and included such other trees and shrubs as alder (Alnus), dogwood (Cornus), maple (Acer), oak (Quer- cus), ash (Fraximus), madrone (Arbutus), beech (Fragus), and elm (Ulmus) (Cain, 1944, p. 107). During this period the ancestors of Euderma and Plecotus possibly could have had a Holarctic distribution. Continental uplift, beginning in the Oligocene epoch and continuing to the present time, led to a gradual southward spread of the temperate 212 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 forests, so that in the Miocene they became discontinuous, with seg- ments in North America and Eurasia (Cain, 1944, p. 107). Presum- ably, the distribution of the ancestors of Huderma and Plecotus may have become discontinuous at the same time, providing isolation for major evolution within the group. The Eurasian segment developed into an evolutionary dead end, Barbastella, which, though greatly modified in form, represents the ancestral stock. Barbasiella has a geographic range most remote from the postulated Nearctic center of origin of the group. Genus Fuderma Meanwhile, in the North American segment, evolution was rapid and spectacular, directed toward auditory specialization. Huderma is a derivative of the early stages of this evolution. It is the most specialized, and, in many respects, the most primitive of the big-eared forms. It must have had a long period of evolution along its own line, distinct from that of the other members of the group. Whereas Euderma has developed characters of its own, such as the connection of the posterior basal lobe of the auricle with the tragus, unique colora- tion, reduction of dentition, and specialization of the canines, among the other big-eared forms (genus Plecotus) there have been only minor variations of features common to all. The nature of the isolating mechanism that allowed the divergence of the Plecotus and Huderma stems is not apparent. Possibly Huderma was southern and wide- spread during Pliocene and had its range restricted and displaced by the more northern Plecotus during the Pleistocene glaciations. Genus Plecotus Subgenus Idionycteris The species of Plecotus seem to represent evolutionary stages. P. phyllotis is most primitive and conservative, and most like Huderma; P. auritus is somewhat more progressive; and P. mexicanus, P. rafines- qu, and P. townsendui are most progressive. P. phyllotis presumably diverged from the main stem while it still bore much resemblance to the earlier derived Huderma. P. phyllotis failed to match the special- izations of the later derived forms, and if abundance and area of distribution be taken as measures of success, it definitely occupies a position inferior to them. It seems to be extremely rare, and inhabits a restricted area on the fringe of the ranges of P. mexicanus and P. townsend. On the other hand, the more progressive P. auritus and P. townsendw are widely distributed, with ranges trans-continental in scope, and are relatively abundant. P. auritus is even the most abundant bat in some parts of its range. AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 213 Subgenus Plecotus Invasion of Eurasia by way of the Bering Strait area by the P. auritus stock probably occurred during the Pliocene [much migration in Middle and Upper Pliocene (Simpson, 1947, p. 625)]. This would have required @ more northern distribution than any species of Plecotus has today. Changes in habits or habitat could have allowed a more northern range. Species of Plecotus now range into the warmer portions of the Cana- dian life zone (and its Eurasian equivalent). The cooler portions of this zone lie within 1,000 miles of Bering Strait. Only aslight amelioration of today’s climate would be required to provide similar floral conditions to Bering Strait. The present wide distribution of cool climates seems to be an exception in geological history. Even during the Pleistocene “Tce Age” warm climates and their associated faunas extended farther north during the interglacial periods than they do today. Presumably, during the Pliocene, warmer climates may have extended even farther north. If the pre-Pliocene Plecotus-like bats were not cave inhabitants, then a change in habit to include cave roosting would have allowed a more northern dispersal, provided suitable food supplies and adequate caves were available. Resort to caves for hibernation permits habitation of areas with colder winters. It also provides refuge in eras of changing climate, for modification of the climate within the cave may be negli- gible in comparison with the change on the surface. Barbastella and Plecotus auritus frequently roost during the summer under loose bark on tree trunks, in cavities in trees and under the eaves of houses, but usually hibernate in caves or in attics of houses. The most primitive living species of the subgenus Corynorhinus, P. rafinesquii, appears to be primarily a tree rooster, whereas the progressive species P. townsendiz seems to roost only in caves and houses. The ancestors of Plecotus auritus spread through most of the tem- perate portions of Eurasia, but were blocked from southward expansion into Maylasia and Africa by the hot climates of the equatorial regions. They came eventually to overlap broadly and perhaps partially dis- place the range of their relative, Barbastella, a rather rare bat whose continent-spanning range averages somewhat more southern than the range of P. auritus. The Plecotus that now inhabits Eurasia and northern Africa is probably not very different in appearance from the pre-Pleistocene migrant. This may be inferred from its similarity to the primitive New World species P. phyllotis and Pleistocene P. alleganiensis and P. crassidens. If a common origin for these forms and P. auritus be envisioned, and if a pre-Pleistocene dispersal of Plecotus into Eurasia VOL. 110 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM 214 ‘UO eIDe]S DUII0ISIO[q JO saseyd 10}¥] 0} UONLIAI UI Snurysoukso7) SNUAZQNS ay} JO UOTINIIYsIp [eONaI0VYT—'9Z AUNT “WwSu3adSid OL SHaINuVE JO WOV7 ONV 3LYVWITD QTIW 39V IVIOVIOYALNI HLNOWYVA Z emesis ww ww ww we em ee = = / LN3W93S eon Ale ae a 39vV IwI0Vv19 OLNI NOILV10S!I ‘3ONVYH 4O AVIGNicen NOILOVYLNOD 3SNVO syYuazIdNv19 } A +44 1 ee ce ee ee ee es ee ee ee ee ee ee ee nn i an a ns nr rrr rrr “SLW NVOIX3SW NI LN3W93S S3LVIOSI ALVWII1D ONIWYVM “NOILVILN3Y354!10 40 13A37 S3193dS LV LN3W93S 3S “TwSuadSid OL SYaINYuVE JO WOV1 GNVY 31LVWITD GTIW 39V IVIOVISYSILNI NOWVONYWS \ ee ee we we we ee we ee we ee we we we eye a ae aw ww w/w ww ww www wm awn ere £ \ / "NOILVILN3Y¥34410 JO 13A317 $3193dS LY LN3W93S NVOIX3JN “MS NI ONY SyYuVZO : 39¥ IWWIdv19 OQNV SNVIHOV1IVdd¥ YyaN : NISNOOSIM SLN3W93S 31v10SI ‘3ONVY 4O NOILOVYLNOD 3SNWO SHzINvI19 LNaW9a3aS LN3W9 3S NVIHOV1Vdd¥ »YYZO AMERICAN BATS—-HANDLEY 215 be accepted, then the morphological similarities between Old and New World Plecotus must be characters that were shared before dispersal occurred. The primitive Corynorhinus-like Plecotus crassidens may have reached Eurasia in a secondary Pliocene invasion, bringing it into contact with the already widespread and firmly established P. auritus. Apparently it did not persist beyond the early Pleistocene and left no derivatives. Subgenus Corynorhinus The group of species that form the American subgenus Corynorhinus seem to represent the stem of the evolutionary line that has developed Barbastella, Euderma, and Plecotus. The present center of differentia- tion of this division appears to be in the arid southwestern portion of the United States. This area is presently inhabited by Plecotus town- sendit, a form that is actively differentiating today. It is the most abundant and widespread member of the subgenus, there is much regional variation within its large geographic range, and its range is fringed with derivatives from it or from its immediate ancestors. The evolution and present distribution of the Recent species of the subgenus Corynorhinus can possibly be related to glacial disturbances during the Pleistocene (fig. 26). The picture presented in this figure reduces the problem to its barest essentials and is almost certainly oversimplified. Forms that occurred earlier in the Pleistocene (Nebraskan, Aftonian, and Kansan ages) cannot be accounted for, and it is very likely that other, now extinct, species existed within the time represented in this diagram. For example, Plecotus tetra- lophodon lived perhaps as recently as late Wisconsin glacial age. It was closely related to P. townsendii but probably was not ancestral to it. P. alleganiensis probably lived as recently as the Sangamon interglacial age. It was closely related to P. townsendi and P. rafinesquit and may have been a direct ancestor of either of these Recent species. The Pleistocene epoch was characterized by an alternation of periods of warmth and cold. During the warm interglacial ages, forms such as the species of Plecotus conceivably could have been distributed across the continent from coast to coast, provided trees or caves were present. During glacial times distribution patterns were shifted southward, contracted, and may have been split into isolated segments as icecaps moved southward toward the Gulf of Mexico and through the Rocky Mountain range. ‘The most southerly advance of the ice brought it within 500 miles of the present Gulf Coast. Adjacent to the ice front was a belt of treeless tundra of unknown width. Faunas and floras were compressed southward 216 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 ——— —_—- —\_—_- ——— il I P _—__—_—_—_—_— Figure 27.—Relationship of the present distribution of the subgenus Corynorhinus and the maximum southward extension of Wisconsin glaciation. Plecotus townsendti, horizontal shading; P. mexicanus and P. rafinesquit, vertical shading; southern limit of glaciers, heavy line. before the advance of the ice. Probably temperate climate inhabit- ants found conditions least severe in the southwest and in the extreme southeast, in the region of the Carolinas and Florida which was pro- tected by the Appalachian Highlands from the winds that blew off the icecaps during some phases of the glacial cycle. The Gulf Coastal pathway south of the ice may have been less hospitable for these forms inasmuch as it was unprotected from the ice chilled winds and had rivers of meltwater flowing across it. Furthermore, competition for its limited niches may have been acute. Under these conditions, a population of Plecotus that may have had a transcontinental distribution in the Yarmouth interglacial age, might have been isolated into southeastern and southwestern seg- ments during the ensuing Illinoian glacial age. The southwestern segment included the mountains of northern and central Mexico in its range. AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 217 With the retreat of the Illinoian icecap and the warming during Sangamon time, Plecotus could have expanded its range again from coast to coast and perhaps northward into Canada and Alaska if caves were available. By this time the southwestern and south- eastern segments had differentiated to the species level and remained genetically distinct when their expanding ranges came into contact. In the meantime, northward advance of warm climate floras and faunas isolated the Plecotus of the Mexican mountains from the remainder of the southwestern segment. Southward advance of the Wisconsin icecaps and cooling climates once again contracted the range of Plecotus and broke its wide, con- tinuous distribution into several isolated segments, remnants of which now occur in the southeastern lowlands, in the Appalachians, in the Ozarks, and in southwestern North America. Contact was reestab- lished between the southwestern segment and the Mexican segment which had by this time diverged to the species level. Withdrawal of the Wisconsin icesheets and amelioration of climate, still proceeding, make it possible once more for the ranges of Plecotus to expand. Plotting the present distribution of American Plecotus on a map (fig. 27) showing the maximum southward extension of Wisconsin glaciation lends emphasis to the probability that range expansion has progressed slowly. The present distribution of Plecotus probably bears considerable resemblance to its distribution in the Wisconsin age. It is significant that, in the several thousand years since the last glacial retreat, bats of several genera have moved north- ward, far into the glaciated area, but Plecotus has barely penetrated it. No sharp biotic division marks the drift border, and there is no lack of caves north of the present range of Piecotus (caves in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, New England, and Ontario, for example) to prevent its northward spread. To assume a relatively slow rate of dispersal for Plecotus could explain its present pattern of distribution, and furnish an important mechanism for speciation. 110 VOL. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM 218 ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ o-% 9 °9-€ 9 6°S-9°¢ L°9=4°¢ 0% 9 8°¢ 9°¢ I T T I 0@ €°9 69 L°9 é z 4 z 0-0 ¢°9-4°9 LEL-Ouk 19-8 °9 0°0 ¢’9 c'L 0°9 F ¥ ¥ ¥ o-Z 9°9-€°9 0°9-9 9 L°g-G"9 0% 9°9 8°9 L°g z 4 4 G GZ § ‘9-29 T'9-0°9 L°¢-G'q 0% €°9 19 9°¢ T 4 T IT rig ee 0°L-L°9 00 8°9 L'h 09 Yqsudy xepuy Wy pvoiq q)3u9] AMOI 300} dsno ;] hehe) eee 6 [27 B[ed4sog AICTPIXV JL b 7 9°9-2'g Q°8-L'L rs z'8 I I rs 06 z G 6'S-9'g 16-26 Lg 9°6 5 ¥ 9°S-£°9 8-18 rg £8 z z 9°9-9°g Z'6-8'8 9°g 06 T T L°9 a) qyydep yy pBerq esto UyeIg qipresq Te} q10104 UJ 66-98 6 '6-4'8 6 OI-@ OT ¢ Or GAPBe1q OT} BULOZAT T “21-0 ‘OT 891 SG 6 '8I-F'8I L'8T ¥ @°L1-6 91 O°LT o'LI-L ‘91 0°LT 0 ‘61-8 8ST 6'8T 300] 4soyeoly SNe ay se hie hee gare ae =| S[BPNPTATPUT "ONT aid drei te in SOLO TCT tT aig ag 30 + ga a “-"93VIDA VY (‘Aorg yodoH ‘vuryoO) 8NPLLND “* SoULVI4X RK ec. pe ae py re ene eee “-"9SCIIAY (euozlIy) sop hyd “gq ile ee Oe Eee ee ae S[BNPIATPUT “ONT REDE Ge Pa ke eS oe ~ $oUlo1 4x Tet PRaep Saree Ee ies oe mere toe asBIIAV ("S".Q UW184S9, 4) UWNIDINIDUL “AT 188 IAL Sa te et eS soumladyx Fo aca ne a e e Gocareie iae g OSVIDAV (‘Ao1g qedoy ‘euyyO) SNPIND *T Bo re Ot a ak ean is hd SoUo.14 Xo SD a irae aI TE SS ata oR ae aM OsBIOAV (OdTX9 JT) sijoppiyd *g SSeS ae ae ees eg ea Soule} X iT Faas De ee aS OSBIDAY (‘SQ U403S9 MA) UNIDINIDUL “AT 10[ BUI 7 snyline ‘gq pun ‘siyo][Ayd snyooo[g ‘unys[novM vullepny fo spuamainsnau 1]/NYS—' 1, AAV J, 219 AMERICAN BATS—-HANDLEY ey ee a a ee a es ee a ot Ee 6I 9T ST 9T 9T 9T 91 ST OCR nicest bac See ga S[BNPIATPUL "ON, o-T L°g-9'¢ 6°S-9°9 SP-LP LS-¥'G SL-EL F'E-Z'E S8-9'L Fa) Co Gee | nana a ae eee Sw soulelyX eT gg 8g LY gg gL Sis: 08 i) CN te es ae ee ee CE ee ag oe OSVIIA VY (esuel JO syred [[B Uy SetzI[e00'T) OIVTL 9 7 ¥ if 4 ¥ 5 € C9 Garena gaan canes ere STBNPIATPUT "ONT GT 8°S-9'9 sc-L'¢ 8 F-9'F L’S-#'¢ SL-9L FE-F' T8-6'2 SOT=6:0]. Uli ce see a ee ie ae, soUe.14X oT “g sg Le gg jb? Ve 08 Qo |Saceeseenea=aacesek== eee = oe ees OBBIDAV (a3uel Jo sjzed [ye ur [oAoqe asoyy ydooxe] SetzI[200'T) 1g eg og og cg ce ag zg CCl wipes ceo ne eee S[W@NPTATPUT "ON, oT 0°9-4'¢ o9-G'9 0'S-9'F 0°9-7°S SiL-E'2 9'8-2'S 9°8-8°2 6SI-OIPL) Ulf ok a ee eee somolyxq 61 Lg gg SF gg gL re 8 POU. |;sis css Sees eee aseloA (ZN10819 A ) 6 g g g ¢ g g ¢ 2 ers | ee ees S[BNPIATPUL "ONT (Guat Lc-¥'s g°c-9'¢ 8't-9'F L°g-G°g Dele Gek ge-SE 8-08 (eit dberoe Genoa: Sreror Sas ee age SsoTMoI4X 6T 9°g 9g LY 9°¢ OL re 28 COW OAPs ena RET sag ae ~-"9SB10A VY (oyenfeueny ) 6 6 8 6 8 8 6 9 Gr WARES SSSeS oS ieee amas S[@NPIATPUT “ON Go 33-9 6°9-9°S St-LF Lo-¥'9 T8-G°L ¥'E-2'E €°8-8°L GiGT=229 geen | eee aes aw eT soulel xy 0% “Lg g°¢ SF g°¢ 92 ee 08 C.O [uae gh ese ace. oe ea OSVIOA VY (snqenyiTO) soTVUlO Ty qydep qypeeiq xoput qypeeiq q4su0] 439] qypveq qypvo1q q43U9] dsno ;] Teveled [7B [Vd4sog MOI 4400} Teqqio1eqzuy | oevur0ss7 4so}Bo1h) AIVITXBIAL 9seo UlBIg Bae ee a a ee SS Se eS Se SnuBdIxeul snjooo][g fo syuawaunsnaw 1)NYG—s AAV], 110 vou. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM 220 eC er rr — nn — ST iat II Or Or 6-% 69-6 '°S 9°9-3 "9 0°9-L°9 0°8-9°L 0% 09 e's 8°9 8°L II 9 9 9 9 GG €°9-0°9 L° €°S-Z'9 09-8 °¢ 6°L-L°L 0% 19 a) o°g 6°9 8°L 176 la FI ra! FI (Gx $'9-0'9 9°S-3'°9 T‘9-2°9 &'8-9'L 0% 19 €°9 69 6°L bas Il ras II Il Gs Z°9-9 9 MeO tY 0°9-2°9 0'8-F°L 0% 6°9 a9 6S Lok OL 6 OT 8 L o-G £°9-0'9 F'S-Z'¢ 0°9-2°9 0'8-L°2 0% 19 eo 6°¢ 6°L qjsug] yydop qypeeiq xoputr W4pBe1q AMOI 3004 dsno jJ 18388 [eqyeredysog | Areppyxeyy OSs¥0 URI S[VNPTATPUT *ON Ane tye = eo eo ee gare somlodyx a aaa Lara ta og eee a amen OSBIIAY (oduvI JO syred [[e UT Sorii[e00 7) unbsauyos “4 "gq SOMO Xf SRE ORT Te Sei ee ce OSBIOAV (SpUBLMOT [B4SvOd OFJUeTIY) S1YQOLIDUL “4 OBIT (asuBd JO syed [[e UT soz}][Vo0’T) unbsauyor *4"q [eIWqIOIejUT | dYBUIOSAZ SoUdalyX iy SEUSS coe OG RV ES 3G EGRET SEE RTS BE OsBIDAV (SPUBLMO] [BASBOd J[NH) 8170LIDUL “A SOULOI4X A a Sr ae rice y ar ae at ae came OsBIOAV (Spuv[AO] [BysBOd OT}ULI1V ) S1YV0LIDU “4° [BUT -—-—-— rrr ee IMbsouygel snyooo[q fo syuawmainspau 1]nYIJ—'6 LAV J, AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY XOpul dsno jJ TOA 9, 6's qypBeq Teqered IIL T9265) 0°9 qq3u9] jeveredysog §°9-0'9 II 6 'S-6'F eg qySU9] MOI 7}00} ACTIX YL L L 6 °S-L'9 €°8-0'8 g°¢ Z'8 er eI 6°S-4'S T'8-9°L 9°g 8'L 8 8 6°9-9'S 61-92 19 8'L ia II T'9-2°S $8-6'L 6's 1'8 OL or 6°9-9°g £'8-9'L Lg 0's a II 0°9-9'9 O°8-L°L 19 8°L qidep qIpBoq eseo UTBIG L°8-4'& 9'€ I L°€-G'S g's TIpBeq [e11q1010} 0] IT 8'8-7'8 9°8 }pveiq dI}BULOSAZ GEO T=2u0 lal | Seeeaeeaneaaemaennac oman SOUTOIYX GY QO0 9 tees t aac anaes OSBIDAY (IINOSsI PT PUB sesuByIY) suabur'. Sl vaee el ipeete ciao a aan STeNPTATPUT "ON 291-0 2G ial eaecnene mae ce teenage a cin oe SOULOIIX G30 iid! | sera ce ee Soe gs oe ae OSBIDAY (erMyBop ueyy Joyo osuBI JO sqyred UT Sor}t[Voo’T) 81)D.19SND “2 * G0 8 | RERaone SoS Saaeeccacnaee S[BNPIATPUT “ON GEOTSOCC eae | Ginah bees sacar asaccaasnosees SOUT9I}X OL be Pe aS eee ceae OSB1IOA VY (eTIMqrog) 827D.198ND *}2 “I OI BTL it | pee eee Oae s[BnprArpuy "ON Ce TROLO 1 Rea aaa ees SOTMOIYX 260 el | Geenicsaaesee ea aaeeeame cee OSBIOAV (sesueyry) suabur “2° Qt.” _ | pees SSeS SS ass S[BNPyATpUT ‘ON GEO [=a [ak | aeiaentee = aamemanaaa ceca SOULOI}X Fay) - |PoReseeseeseeresbeecacs Saco OsBIIA VY (e[Inyqeo9 uey} 1oyjO asuvi Jo syed UT sopqTvo0'y) 8yDIgSND "2 "J Te | Gaaien eee S[BQPIATPUT "ON SEAT ||P eeee cec eae SOUI9.I}X A (Wye | RERRBS PSs seeeseceeeeeeectcnooy OSBIOAY (BTTnyeoD) §1]D1]8ND “2 "I to BULA 43009] 480] BOLD SUOBUL “4 ‘g pUD SITVIJSNB IIpussuMO} SNyOoI J fo szwawainsnawm jNYI—OL AIAV I, 110 VOL. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM 222 g ¥ € g 7 ¥ ¢ € CCE Polid an © eat ee ae ance S[BNPTATPUt “ON 1-0 0°9-6'S 1'9-0°9 € "9-19 8'o-F'9 Gisela 9848 6 ‘8-98 OGISICOL fg =o 7 ce eae eae soulel4yxq 20 09 19 €°¢ 9°g 6°L i 3 L'8 COs = liga ea ear arrears ODvIOAY (vueju0 PY) 9 ¢ g g g g ¢ g a [ia er ASRS Be NIRS gC S[BNpTATPUT “ON c-0 6 °S-9 °¢ 0°9-L°¢ 0°S-8 "PF L°S-¢'°g¢ 8°L-9'L 9 ‘8-8 °€ L'8-¥'8 CYR) Ea Abt) Se lal Ipanema Se oe eae Eo og soUlol4x o'0 8°¢ 8°¢ 64 9°9 Le re c's GEG Tm. | gs ee ae wens nee meer ian OSCIOAV (BUOZIIY U19q}1I0U pus [8.1]9D) 8 Z L 8 L Z L Z LA ks cake ar oaks oe een ea ee S[PNPTATpuUy “ON 1-0 L-SSPe9 T°9-9 °¢ 1 '°-8'P 8°S-F'¢ 0'8-¥'L 9 "-€'°E 9'8-F'8 EOC ial ekar arte ae ea RE. SoUldIIXG o'0 9°¢ 8°¢ 0's e'¢ 9°L c's e'8 HT Sie an site ee aii et aed emesis, esvIIAV (euozj1y Usay4jNog) OBJ Or Or Or Or Or OL or OT OL: weak ise sen a a ween ee oar ae S[BNPTATpUy “ON 1-0 @'9-6'S ¥'9-0'°9 CeeeTeg 0 ‘9-9 "9 f 8-8°2 8&4 'e €'6-9'°8 Se Ol=1- Ole 1) er ceaepes a aie eed oa nae Soulel}X T0 09 69 €°¢ 8°9 0'8 9° 8°8 PO, lect ue vos a een eo: esvIIAV (euezuo JAI) 9 z £ 9 g g g € Ga aeecpi RO OY Gel em a me S(eNplArpuUy “ON TO 9°g-G'"¢ T ‘9-6 °S €°¢-6'P L°g-9'¢ 6 °L-9°L 9'€-9'e L'8-€'8 (HE ER ae iS eae ee SOULOIIX GT £°0 9°¢ 0°9 1’ g°¢ igh ce ¢'8 (1G) Boh pea eae cae ta ee men ae eeaecter os OBB10AV (euozITy U10q}10U 2 [v1qU9O) ¥ € I € € € € z Gis” SRS ESE SSS OTST Tk ESE SSE = S[BNPlATpuT ‘ON 0 ORO SE SCe wilt aes star T8=0:9 L°S-F'¢ 6°L-9°L L°e-9'€ 8 '8-€'8 CcSTHSr Oh as ees 38 Sas Re casas Ferra SOULILIX ¢'0 L’s 09 Tg gg 8°L 9°E 9°8 EEO ® oo marae coat aang nome aaa a Q3B1OAV (suoz1y UoyyNOS) :9[BU19,.7 q48u9] qidep qypeeiq xopuy Wy peeiq qj suo MOI 4400} q1pBe1q qyperoiq yy sue dsno {J 1238 [eq [e}eledisog Areyxeyy | OOOC~C~CO Ys TR IQAOIOJUT | OyvVULOsAZ, 480} Bely esvo UlBig susdSa][Vd IIpudasUMOY SNYODI|[Y fo spuamainspawm 1)NYY—T][ WIaV J, 223 AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Oat dake aa beeen ta ls Rae ae S[BNPTAIPUT ‘ON 1-0 €°9-L°S T‘9-0°9 SeS=g 6 °S-L°¢ 0°8-9°L 6ne-228 8 ‘8-9 '8 CLOTS REG Le oll remains fe ean jan Se SOUI914X £°0 T'9 09 £°9 8° 8°L 8°e L°8 T3i9 Tn | Ss ae a oe ane ees ca asBIIAY (BTUTSITA ) snuniUib.101a "2° GP €1 €1 ae €1 eI €1 €I {10 NaS | taco tas ea aaa S[VPNPIAIpUy ‘ON 1-0 29-6 'S € 9-09 ¥'G-Z'S 6°¢-9°¢ SiSaciee 6 °€-9 '€ 06-9 '8 8159) Tie Omi | carne aera ai a aeae oe eee SsoUlol4X 0°0 0°9 19 ag) 8°g 0'8 Lg 8°8 0:9 me | ene sien. @ ooeoegom te aoa OsBIOAV (BUSTA 489) SNUDUIb 110 “2° ZL ZL L Z L 4 Ls 9 Ji pe MEN trea eee ee? tar see S[BNPIATPUTI "ON 2-0 f'9-L'S & 9-8 °¢ (ett 6 '¢-9°¢ GiSaLer: 6 '€-9'E 68-9 '8 F291 Ow | 2 aise Sa ae somle.1yx 9°0 09 T'9 ZG Lg 6°L se. yes CicO le ae ones ie a = eee ae esBIOAY (W0S9I0Q 1.19489 \\) HPUISUMO} “2 “TI OTB TAL & T I if I I I I Tie, Sott| Toe aces ae eane S[BNPIATPUT ‘ON Dy a a I a a ee eee SoUlolyXx £0 0°9 19 eg Lg 6°L 6'¢ 8°8 OL eT tS Sea SSeS OsvIIAY (BTUTZITA ) SnUp1Uib11a 4" 0% II IT Or II ae Il 8 EDs SSS TSS eee S[GNplATPUI "ON 1-0 £°9-0'°9 v'9-0'9 ¥'G-Z'S 0'9-9'9 P'8-L‘L 6 '£-9'@ 16-88 OCZIRM OTe cass aeeeea coe aaa ee soulaiyxy T0 19 a9 €¢ 8°¢ 1'8 se 06 OsOle. clans ca co os aS eee esBIIAV (BTUTSITA 189A) SnunUrb1ta “2 8 8 L 8 Z 8 8 ) CO) rea aa ape ees Borger et S[BNPTATpUy “ON, 1-0 £°9-0'9 ¥ 9-19 'S-1'9 69-99 Z'8-8°L 8"e-S "2g 26-88 6S O1-CNO le | Gea acca aed anata somal} xy 40 T'9 £9 £9 s°¢ 08 Le 06 OO euees aces eee ee omer o3t19A WV (WOZUTYSe AA 7 WOZ01Q W194S9 A) HpwasUNo? “2 “d :e[vUe,T q4su9] q3dep qypee1q xepuy qi peoiq q4su0e[ MOI T4004 qi pve1q Yj pse1q q43u9] dsno iJ Teqeled [sye[edysog ALOT [XV AL [@uqso1ojzuy | oeMO0sAZ 48o} Boy eseo Ulelg a a i ew ae a le SNUBIUISIIA “4 “q PUD IIPUSSUMO}Y IIPUESUMO}Y SNyOde[g fo sjuawainspaw YNYG—ZI WAV, 497256—59——_9 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 224 I 9 g g Sj ¢ Gh Bola ae ee ae S[WNPIAIpUL “ON eS go oa 0S-8F 9I-€1 F-6E OI-6 Sh-OF PEL=LOLRS| tp BOUT OPE 6F Lal It Or LY OHE” a2. pee an eee asvIOAV ($7 10480 44) UNIDINIDUL “iT :O[B]AL Sop ass ; ; ; Se oo 7 F A= 2-52 == BT ENpPIAIpULCON sa ia oR % GP-S ‘IF LI-91 Go UC men Geen gee | ee oe(e SO0%=COL S| Se ae ee ee aa Sea aes 6 IF BT Le per raat (Oo cor 7 apr eto tegen uaa (-aorg yodoy “wuryp) SNPUND “I I Z I I Z I Tk "ooh cess Peres oe S[BNPIAIPUL ‘ON ta ans ae VAL PeOab Vales pace cleats soa) OI Ola 8 |e ylang eagle cee oe re a ee sO Oy G8z SPP [er] [ee] or 0g OM, Vrlcie seme heey esgad os CERROIN (OdTx9J) syonhiyd ‘gq a 5 z Z 7 ¢ g Sos oo *S(SNPIAIpUION se is id 1¢-8F iii L¥-LE ZI-O1 0S-LF HE EULESS sre OS ei ese Real Se SS og GT ras II 6h TD lee aoe edo Ry, ('$° W419489 MA) UNIDINIDUL “AT a] BULA] asuvdxa yysue] yysuey yoyou avid Y43ud] BULAN wWIvIIOT SuUBBIT, WOlj Ie | JOOS purpT | -99410A [IV], [BIOL snyline ‘gq pup ‘siyo[Ayd snyoo9[g ‘UIN}e[NIVW BUJepNy fo spuawmainspau [DULIIT—§E]T AIAV J, 225 AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY ie i RE Fn ee eee eS EE aa aa-=--=-- p - F ardet cumiete eels F i 10G 97 7995 2 Se SRR PLATPUL LON Si SSRIS 8 ‘1P-Z ‘OF Dior eye Cees Wie acura gaa 1¢-9F C0I-46°- | ee teulons xa a ‘If LI Le ar ear 6F (CTE Sp TENS (Aoig yodoy “euryo) SNJLUND “q aoes55----- I I ir T I i ToTe sees ess <"-sPenprarpur "ON ea ee ea eh i ee ee a ee aaa SOUIIFXY a ae CG OF OI OF EE GS StT Cite Ang oo on npe map eee (BuoztIIy) syopjhyd -q PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 226 IO SI LI SI SI €1 €T ooo ees <<“ STBNPIATPUE “ON pew iie tas I ‘&b-L ‘6 CI-II Ge-6 11-6 OS-eF DOTS CO. es are ee BRIS igi 0 ‘1? ral Zs Or 9F 96 Vil Cee ase. coy © te RDO U Ley, (esuBl Jo sjred [[B UL SorzITBoO'T) -3[81N SES SSSSore 9 I a ¢ c ¢ oo eee STBNPIAIpUrL “ON Sa rae ZSb-L ‘0b |---| ee €1-6 OS-IF GOSGGT Fy ers 8 05 et erat a a b Ot eT rE II cr c6 FOO IS whey one 2 ok Coe eS BIOAY (esusr Jo szzed II3 Ur [aAoqe osoy} ydeoxe] serzI]B00'T) SOS OGIO SS= CF CH CP eh Gi €F eee S[BUPIATpUr “ON, oo a aes © FEF ‘OF 21-11 Fe-1E OI-O1 IS-&h COL=O0. sie a) ea enon, Meee Pasosss- Ss FCP ae gE OT 8F 86 ieee ame Tie caro ae SPICE CYNE (ZN19B10 A ) Se =~————- OL Ol OI Mele ee tele alte Cee eon bee alee eee oe ae ee ELON TOLER oe gee es €-er-L OF | [THT] (OSI IOSIA s | Aesemeten al grea wee. ic far ee See heme pine ake Geet mee Un a Sree sss € ‘GF [21] [ze] pr irate Sal gi Sarit” eee a Vana ie ee mm ear MCL) (oyen{sueny) ees ee 6 apa a la ey a 6 6 6 oo eee sTBnprarpul "ON Baia ora CeGp-CaGealy a2 085 ce ales ee Sk 1S-9F SOLSCG. as ian mes oes Se umes ~-------- ee 0 ZF Sere oe ee SSS ZI SF 66 oe a eee SS iene eae OOR LOAN, (enqenylyD) :o[BUlI J esuvdxoa Y}SU9] qysu9] yoyou aB1q ysue] BUI UBIO J SnSBl], Wolj ey | Joos purp_ | -0310A [Tey [810.L SNUBOIXOU SNYOI[ J fo syuawmainspaw JOULIIZY—FI AAV, AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY P LLE-G9S ELE 662-026 186 082-026 G1] esuvdxo SUI —"! 9T 8 FP-1 IP 0 "EP € GP 8 ‘SF-T “SP rl 6 TP 0 EF q33u9] WIGIIO T 9T-3I ial 43309] snse1y, VE-GE 9E-GE ve yojou wWOdy IV 400} pulpy aeiq -9JI9A [IGT 90T-T16 io oni olga a eg Sa akg a SOULIIYXY amare tink care otk bar iar a IBVIIAY (esuBl Jo sjied [[B UL Sor}ITBI0'T) wnbsauyps *4 “gq ae ig ai lari et ica a SOTIIYXY Po pee ee ioe aioe 1 IDBIOAY (SpuB[MO] [B}SBOO JTJURIY) $1J0LIDUL *L “q O18] Sa eee a a ae et SsoWol XA Pt BEI PI BA a OBBIOAY (esuvi Jo syed [[B Ul Sat}ITBIO'T) anbsauypnr *L “J SESS SE reo eos 5 ceesaean or SOWIII}XY oS SF Ss se ae Oe IBBVIIAY (SpuBL MOT [B}SBOD J[N4) SUOLIDUL *L *q Fe ee a SOUWIIPX SoS ee pee oa nr eens cig IBVIIAY (Spuv[ MOT [24S8B09 OTYULIV) SUOLIDU *L “I :O[BUlI FT Iinbsouygel snyooo[g fo sjuawmainspaw Jpulajxgq—G[ Gav], PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 228 eee ae 8 Se Lr oes SvevaanOPs| seaaal ee tt eee FGF Sse tee seo. I Or Or areca | 9 Lvl SV 9T-F1 SSE Gov cI eee ay cI vI SS eaeaacles nails T ‘St-0 GP Siu nS acer 9 ‘SP ST Seceeeekees II een sersome s Rees re Vitis GaOGle 2000s 0 on seeSsoasen 8 ‘CF SH SeReBeone asuedxa yysue] yySud] SUILM WIve10 J SuSBLY, yoyou WOIJ TUG EG 1-8 300} puly L €S-IP ov 6F-EP aviq -OJIVA [IBY 00T-Z6 £01-S6 a la SOUTOI4 XA --------------------- IdBIOAY (e[INYwoD) S2]D1]SND *} “dq a) woot r eo e---- SOULIDIFXY --------------------- ISBIOAY (SesuByIy ) suahur yd ROG St Sa See SS ase SOUIdI} XY Sac ae aah oc te a IBBIOAY (e[INYyBoD ueyy I9qjO osuBi Jo syivd Ul SorzI[BIO'T) SUDLISND “2 “I eae ae Pin pe ee S[BNPIAIpUl “ON ae Se ee ee SOULIIY XA SIR IBVIOAY (eyInyBoD) SUDLISND “7 “I Lo[BUld SUOSUL “4 ‘gg puD SI[BIjSNB IpuasuUMO} SNYOIe[T fo syuswainspaw Jousaxy—'Q[ AIAV J, 229 AMERICAN BATS—-HANDLEY G ‘Vt-F 6E Ob * slseseee ees S[@NPIAIPUT “ON PADIS ih al iG ae Sa SOM I4 XA CG. altecmce = apa ee eee IDBIODAY (IINOSST}, PUB SvsUBYIY) suabut 1 “qd > , eg oe a ee S[GNPIATpUr “ON TE OTST a ea SOULIIPX GY UGE eid: igceat ha © qin ar: Be a ISBIDAY (BlINyBoDH uByy Jey}O aBuvr Jo sued Ul SolzITBI0T) SUDLISND "2 “_q 110 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM Von. 230 OT 0ZE-866 60 G OTE-ZOE 90€ esuedxa BUI 8 ¢ G Sh-T ‘OF LI-GT OFTy. GT L OP T '€7 43 8u9] W1Ival0 7 yysue] snae1y, 9E-ZE yojou WOIj JETT LIi-6 {ica} 300} pulyy CS-SP Oc-Ar aviq -OJI9A [IVT 601-06 Or OTT-€0T LOT SOUIIIYX | ----------------------- IsBIBAY (euOoZzIIY Uley}Nog) A) aN SOULIIYXY raed Sar iat see ee IDVIOAY (wuByuoy,) SsowalyXy WE Ge ae a ee eae IBVIOAY (SUOZIIY Uley}ION ® [v1yUID) SOWOI4XH ~---------------------- adVIOAY (suozIIy UIoYNOg) :oyeway Susosay[ed NpuasuMmo}y snyooo[g fo syuawainspam Jousajrgy—)] HIAV J, 231 AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY a T18-SOE L0E I VP 8 TF II-6 VS-LY g OTI-SOT 801 Fnac ei eae a ee SOULIIY XG ea am a tae ager 9 ISBIOAY (sue, UOPL) aes Ges ao Sh aoe SOUIBIPAG a alo ta ert pt te OS OdVIOAY (BUOZIIY Uloyj10U A [B1}UID) Reet Vy \Wtecess ots I 4 8 it Aliceuewcetpeoys S[enprArpul “ON Be Lam wated al CEC VaOwt 4 | hae se] |/oeoo~—~ oa II-01 1S-$Y SOL-Go. Wis ee SOUIAI4X oer GEE. heoeas- 5] 08 IT OF oo1 BS ROA EIO AN (UWOBIIQ, U19489 AA ) wpuasumo} "} ‘qd ss - 3G 5 a Se Fh cele mains OP gees I 1 I |e eee cee aia s[BNplATpul ‘ON 5 ; CEO PECE OTA erar sori ae ee or a ee lee a eae SOUL XG ep oo Ce Ose ala esas 8E II cr G01 Se a eee reel AY, a (BIUISILA ) Z SNUDIUWLU *} “I = = & PI i 6 OL OT Oe tomer iam oy coe ae s[enprAlpul "ON LACAUIS eae 2 So 6E-FE SI-IT PS—OF GICs Ay hwicats at one eee Soulat]™ s OI 8 oF GI ce ral 6F 10) GO Ni a ai cadence anon on Gale aBBIOAY a (BIUISITA 989,\\) fe, snupiuibiia “} “dd >) ees “a irk ee ee a cee ea 6 g OT OH el to eee es S[enpralpul “ON a a Lay GeV a 8 on a 9E-0E oI-IT €9-9F AVION. [o> 5 RT ES sotmedy xX ae aot. Scere Mire an er ts ral 8F LOD =, “lie peirets ciaae tere se osBloAy a (MoySUTYySeEM 2 UOSAIQ U1e4sSo 4) S Upussuno} *} ‘d Sy OTB] esuvdxa yysue] yysue] yojou aeiq yysue] SUILM W1B910 J SUSBLL, wo ieq | yooy pulfy | -eW0A [IBY [8JOL, ee ee ee SNUBIUIZIIA “4 ‘gq PUD IIPUGSUMO} ITpUGSUMO} SNYODT fO Spuawasnspau JDULI}ITY — SBT ATAVL 233 BATS—HANDLEY AMERICAN G SIE-1€ €I€ G FIE—00E LOE 9 EP 8€ ¥ 9-1 SP 9 FF € Si- Lal GG 8é-1é ve éI-IT GS-OF oS-8P TOT-—26 €0I-86 TOT (BIUIDITA ) snupiurbsra “2 “q SoUlOIYXY --------------------- ddRIODAY (BIUISITA 389 AA) SnuniUrb.iid *} “_q 234 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM vou. 116 Bibliography Aucock, N. H., aNnp Morrat, C. B. 1901. The natural history of Irish bats. The long-eared bat, Plecotus auritus, Linnaeus. Irish Nat., vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 241-251. Acorn, J. R. 1944. Notes on the winter occurrence of bats in Nevada. Journ. Mamm., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 308-310. AULEN, G. M. 1916. Bats of the genus Corynorhinus. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 331-358, 1 pl. 1939. Bats. x+368 pp., illus. ALLEN, H. 1864. Monograph of the bats of North America. Smithsonian Mise. Coll., vol. 7, art. 1 (publ. 165), xxiv-+85 pp., 68 figs. 1865. On a new genus of Vespertilionidae. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila- delphia, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 173-175. 1892. A new genus of Vespertilionidae. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia (1891), vol. 48, pt. 3, pp. 467-470. 1894. A monograph of the bats of North America. U.S. Nat. Mus. Bull. 43, x +198 pp., 38 pls., 1893. ALLEN, J. A. 1881. List of mammals collected by Dr. Edward Palmer in northeastern Mexico, with field-notes by the collector. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 183-189. 1890. Notes on collections of mammals made in central and southern Mexico .... Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 175-194. 1891. Description of a new species of big-eared bat, of the genus Histiotus, from southern California. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 195-198. AMADON, D. 1953. Migratory birds of relict distribution: Some inferences. Auk, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 461-469. ANDERSEN, K. 1908. A monograph of the chiropteran genera Uroderma, Enchisthenes, and Artibeus. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, pp. 204-319, figs. 40-59. ANDERSON, R. M. 1947. Catalogue of Canadian Recent mammals. Bull. Nat. Mus. Canada (1946), no. 102, vi+238 pp. AntHony, H. E. 1918. The indigenous land mammals of Porto Rico, living and extinct. Mem. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., new ser., vol. 2, pt. 2, pp. 329-435, pls. 55-74, 55 figs. 1923. Mammals from Mexico and South America. Amer. Mus. Nov., no. 54, 10 pp. Asucrart, G. P. 1932. A third record of the spotted bat (Huderma maculata) for California. Journ. Mamm., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 162-163. BalILry, V. 1930. Animal life of Yellowstone National Park. xiv-+241 pp., 70 figs. 1931. Mammals of New Mexico. North Amer. Fauna, no. 53, 412 pp., 22 pls., 58 figs. AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 235 1936. The mammals and life zones of Oregon. North Amer. Fauna, no. 55, 416 pp., 52 pls., 102 figs., map. Baker, R. H. 1956. Mammals of Coahuila, México. Univ. Kansas Pub]. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 125-335, 75 figs. Barsoour, R. W. 195la. A preliminary list of the mammals of Preston County, West Virginia. Proc. West Virginia Acad. Sci. (1950), vol. 22, pp. 48-53. 1951b. Notes on mammals from West Virginia. Journ. Mamm., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 368-371. 1957. Some additional mammal records from Kentucky. Journ. Mamm., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 140-141. BarReETT-Hami.ttTon, G. E. H. 1910-1911. A history of British mammals. Vol. 1, xvi+263 pp., illus. Becustein, J. M. 1800. Translation of Thomas Pennant’s ‘‘Allgemeine Uebersicht der vierfussigen Thiere.’”’ Vol. 2, pp. i-xii-+323-668. Bemr, J. R., anp Ricwarps, A. G. 1956. Hibernation of the big brown bat. Journ. Mamm., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 31-41, 1 pl., 2 figs. Benson, S. B. 1954. Records of the spotted bat (Huderma maculata) from California and Utah. Journ. Mamm., vol. 35, no. 1, p. 117. Buack, J. D. 1936. Mammals of northwestern Arkansas. Journ. Mamm., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 29-35. Buarr, W. F. 1939. Faunal relationships and geographic distribution of mammals in Oklahoma. Amer. Midl. Nat., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 85-133, 1 fig. 1952. Bats of the Edwards Plateau in central Texas. Texas Journ. Sci., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 95-98. 1954. Mammals of the Mesquite Plains Biotic District in Texas and Okla- homa, and speciation in the central grasslands. Texas Journ. Sci., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 235-264, 1 fig. Buarr, W. F., ano Miuuer, C. E., JR. 1949. The mammals of the Sierra Vieja region, southwestern Texas, with remarks on the biogeographic position of the region. Texas Journ. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 67-92. Boots, E. S. 1945. Corynorhinus in northeastern Oregon. Murrelet, vol. 26, no. 2, p. 26. BoreEuu, A. E., anp Bryant, M. D. 1942. Mammals of the Big Bend area of Texas. Univ. California Publ. Zool., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 1-62, 5 pls., 1 fig. BrIM.eEy, C. S. 1905. ) . Beak in dorsal view attenuate from antennal insertion to epicel finde Feo Beak in dorsal view nearly parallel-sided from antennal insertion to apex (Mexico). . . . . . . . latitator, new species (p. 317) Antennae yellowish: inserted a distance from eye slightly less than width of frons; dorsal surface of beak clothed with scales coarser, shorter, and whiter than pies on dorsal surface of prothorax, intervals in part with two rows of punctures (San Luis Potosf and Puebla). innocens, new species (p. 314) Antennae dark, inserted at distance from eye slightly greater than width of frons; dorsal surface of beak clothed with scales similar to those on dorsal surface of prothorax; intervals with one row of punctures (Guatemala, British Honduras). . . ... . . brachycephalum Wagner (p. 310) First segment of tarsus 1 elonzate. four times as long as wide (Michoacd4n, Ruebla) a ee . . . mirandum, new species (p. 318) First segment phe ae ploneata: 6k’ nc MFS igsle BPs al. ceetspass hiethctastga, A Tarsus 1 with first segment with inner margin strongly rounded from base to apex, forming a broad, rounded lobe projecting distally beyond apex of segment, from above inner pers of segment much broader than outer half (Veracruz)... . . . mirificum, new species (p. 319) Tarsus | with first eeement. not so iredsaed. Sh sy We cee ee ie mead epee Front femur distinctly swollen, antennae inserted at basal fourth of beak, at distance from eye equal to width of frons (Michoac4én). caenum, new species (p. 312) Hrontwemurmot swolleni=.cepee es oo us Gee) eee ea Gees css ee HG First segment of tarsus 3 with inner angle produced into a short spine (Vera- cruz, Panama) .......... .. . sancti-felicis Sharp (p. 320) PP ATSUS{O SIMD lCysyci iss) ha las ial Je ge, ve eva ame iat cae et es, ees Antennae inserted at not more than basal third of he aoe : iene 8 Antennae inserted just behind middle of beak, yellowish; eal strongly deflexed at middle (Arizona)... . . . . brunnicornis Fall (p. 3238) Beak shorter than prothorax, stout; size greater than 3.5 mm. (Puebla). bettyae, new species (p. 263) Beak longer than prothorax, slender; sizelessthan2.8mm....... 19 254 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. Antennae inserted at basal fifth of beak, at distance from eye equal to width of frons (San Luis Potos{, Morelos). . . innocuum, new species (p. 315) Antennae inserted at basal third of beak, at distance from eye twice width of frons ...°. 20 Beak in lateral view attenuate Age cence mention to oer (Arizona). eccentricum Fall (p. 324) Beak in lateral view nearly parallel beyond antennal insertion (Puebla, México, Morelos; Guatemala) . . . . punctulirostre Sharp (p. 325) Fifth ventral segment with lateral apical angles produced into a pair of trian- gular processes projecting posteriorly slightly beyond tips of elytra (Tres Marfas Island, Mexico) . . . . . . acanenicum, new species (p. 282) Fifth ventral segment not so medinedl: Sefer ay oe ; F a 77° Front tibia more or less flattened on inner surface, this area Fee of scales, generally polished and noticeably striate; ne generally inserted at distance from eye less than width of frons. . ........... 32 Front:tibia not so modified... 4. Ye sae eth ed ice ea First segment of tarsus 1 with outer apical ek produced intoaspine. . 24 First segment of tarsus 1 simple. . .. . Sige duh fd sb tayf ev col has eles ee Size about 2.0 mm.; elytral intervals with two rows of scales which are coarse and pearly in solon on basal margin of elytra and along basal third of suture; laterally and posteriorly coarse scales are bounded by a region of very fine, yellowish scales; elytra in posterior half and area lateral of interval 5 clothed with white, hairlike scales; tibiae yellowish (Guatemala). calcaratipes Sharp (p. 312) Size less than 1.5 mm., elytral intervals with one row of uniform, fine scales; tibiae nearly: blackat.ius 2 RU a) Be ats, 02S es Spine on outer angle of first segment of tarsus 1 large, triangular in shape, as long as tarsal segment is wide at apex (Brazil, Nicaragua). spinitarse Wagner (p. 321) Spine on outer angle of first segment of tarsus 1 small, shorter than width of tarsal segment (Veracruz, Puebla). . . . emoplus, new species (p. 314) Tibia 1 with a short, flat area less than one-third its length, not or very slightly striate (New York-Florida-Texas-W yoming). sayi Gyllenhal (p. 306) Tibia 1 with flat or concave area extending about one-half its length. . 27 Flat area on tibia 1 extremely densely and finely striate so that the area appears irridescent, individual striae not discernible. ...... 28 Flat area on tibia 1 with coarser, distinct, well separated striae, not irri- descents US tate vie wy Hs ee Omi teem Ee ches Ashe, US mae Tibial mucrones projecting in line with feild axis of tibiae; beak strongly attenuate toward apex (Nebraska, Colorado, Oklahoma). nebraskense Fall (p. 301). Tibial mucrones projecting at an angle with long axis of tibiae; beak slightly attenuate toward apex (District of Columbia, Tennessee). novellum Fall (p. 303) Tibia 1 straight in anterior view... . 30 Tibia 1 deflexed at apical two-fifths in arteien view (Mexico: Guatemala godmani Wagner (p. 297) Beak in dorsal view distinctly expanded at apex (Guatemala; Puebla, México, Distrito Federal)... .. . . .aurichalceum Wagner (p. 296) Beak in dorsal view cylindrical a peer Ie eae 2 6 US ee eT 31. 32. 33. 34, 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. SUBGENUS TRICHAPION—KISSINGER 255 Size about 1.6 mm.; metasternum comparatively coarsely, sparsely punc- tured; tibial mucrones fine, curved (Pueblo, México, Distrito Federal). parcum, new species (p. 305) Size about 2.0 mm.; metasternum comparatively finely, densely punctured; tibial mucrones Bante eras shanliet = Oe Elytra not aeneous, pubescence Bonny ee Antennal ep pearly three times as long as wide, covered with very sparse, long, suberect setae and shorter, more abundant, decumbent setae (Arizona, New Mexico). oriotes, new species (p. 304) Elytra moderately aeneous, pubescence on dorsal surface with faint yellowish cast, white laterally; antennal club slightly more than twice as long as wide, covered with nearly uniform, long, suberect setae (New York- Florida, Alabama). ..... . . .griseum Smith (p. 300) Antennae inserted at distance han ee eee than width of frons; dorsal pubescence squamiform (Texas, México) . . propinquicorne Fall (p. 277) Antennae inserted at distance from eye not less than width of frons. . 34 Prothorax much wider at middle than base, sides greatly rounded. . . 35 Prothorax at middle at most ime wider than ee sides not greatly TOUNGEG! 57 ouis Henne Saher ade sae! VO Elytral intervals SreouehaT convex; tibia 1 dilated: curved, bearing long, yellowish pubescence on inner surface (Puebla, Distrito Federal, Micho- acén, Guerrero). . . . . . heterogeneum Sharp (p. 372) Elytral intervals Slichtlyic convex; TonRe 1 dilated (New Hampshire—Georgia, Louisiana, Iowa, Wisconsin) . . . .nigrum Herbst (p. 376) Antennae inserted at about the ails of tis beak, scape longer than next five antennal segments (Chile) . . .meorrhynchum Philippi (p. 275) Antennae inserted distinctly behind middle of: beak’... i.) PA ae FO Antennae inserted at distance from eye equal to or Slightly renee than widthoffrons. .. . ie Taaaywi os Antennae inserted at dictanes from eye ‘distinctly Grentar nena or more) than width of frons. ... SF fice OL Pubescence of dorsal surface penerallsy pont icistral paieeale with one row of fine scales... . a aCe ae, Pubescence of dorsal pte Conan icnone! eivinel iteavale with two rows of fiNGu BOALCRU corals cualer toques eaten te berieriae bit OME od CE CNN Uae Mucrones dentate... . NORGE cee anvil on cbarhions 140 Mucrones simple, at most pibenecinte Seta Boca ee es sepettcaase (40 Frons about as wide as dorsal tip of beak, appearing fagaloete: prothorax basal margin strongly expanded (?Arizona) . . . grossulum Fall (p. 269) Frons wider than dorsal tip of beak (or elytra red), not trisuleate; prothorax basal margin at most) slightly expandeds:..5.....:) ....0. #2... Al EB lytEa red sw OrotlOrax DIACK acs qo. so -e18 1 eo ch pay ee tysy. formate Gdiieeebe legs Ee HKlytra and prothorax black. ... . Mine eet 4a Beak as long as head and prothorax pombined= Pinheras anely punctured, nearly glabrous; dorsal surface of elytra not at all striate; prothorax not constricted apically (Veracruz, Tabasco, Guerrero; British Honduras; Guatemala; Nicaragua; Panama; Colombia; Venezuela; Brazil). rufipenne Gyllenhal (p. 346) Beak shorter than head and prothorax combined; prothorax with rather coarse, deep punctures which bear hairlike setae; striae adjacent to suture distinctly impressed throughout; prothorax distinctly constricted at apex (Tamaulipas, San Luis Potosf). . . . . . evustum, new species (p. 337) 256 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 52. 53. or i Abdomen and metasternum finely, sparsely punctate. ....... 44 Abdomen and metasternum coarsely, closely, deeply punctate. . ... 45 In dorsal view beak not expanded over antennal insertion; beak distinctly shorter than head and prothorax combined (New England—Florida—Texas— Wisconsin) ... . . . patruele Smith (p. 341) In dorsal view beak cintinety eeaenied over antennal insertion; beak about as long as head and prothorax combined (Peru; Amazonas). nitidum Kirsch (p. 341) Mucrones moderately long, slender; elytral intervals not much wider than striae (California, Arizona). . .. .. . . abdominale Smith (p. 333) Mucrones short, blunt; elytral intervals nearly twice as wide as striae (Colo- rado, Idaho, Montana; British Columbia, Alberta, Hudson Bay Territory). centrale Fall (p. 335) Beak about as long as prothorax (Illinois, Nebraska, Colorado, Arizona). modestum Smith (p. 276) Beak distinctly longer than prothorax. .. . Faerie Ch Prothorax slightly wider at middle than base; civtsal iter ae eironale convex, slightly wider than striae (Massachusetts—Tennessee—Texas—Iowa). porcatum Boheman (p. 344) Prothorax at middle not wider than base; elytral intervals at most slightly convex, at least one-half wider than striae. .. . pieces), eis) Elytra at humeri at least two-fifths wider than Sratnorae a base; elytra more than two and three-fourths times as long as prothorax. . .. 49 Elytra at humeri one-third wider than prothorax at base; elytra less than two and three-fourths times as long as prothorax. . . . Bares) te, | OH) In lateral view dorsal surface of head above eyes distinetly declivitous (Tamaulipas). . . ; . . . nanulum, new species (p. 357) In lateral view dorsal purines of endl is flat from eyesto base. .... 50 Elytral intervals convex (Tabasco; British Honduras; Guatemala). oscillator Sharp (p. 359) Elytral intervals flat. . ... ee ROL . Pubescence on side of aaiLOrae aii as coarse as a that c on ‘dorsal surface or midline wan eae pao ha 52 Pubescence on side lof prathoras BRAG twice as coarse as that on dorsal sur- face; in dorsal view beak strongly expanded over antennal insertion (Ta- pacco: Guatemala; Nicaragua). . . . .. mamaguense Wagner (p. 354) Prothorax with uniform, sparse pubescence on dorsal surface . .... 53 Prothorax with scales along median line coarser than those on lateral portion of dorsal surface... . se Oe Prothorax sparsely, finely, shallowly, manotured: dows ay aad daterater eyes acutely prominent; scales in elytral striae minute, not larger than those on intervals (Tamaulipas). . . . . . subsequens, new species (p. 364) Prothorax moderately densely, finely, deeply punctured; eyes more rounded; scales in elytral striae distinctly larger than those on intervals (Ontario; New York, Virginia, Tennessee, Texas, Kansas, Iowa, Michigan). reconditum Gyllenhal (p. 361) Beak slightly shorter than head and prothorax combined; prothorax more deeply, uniformly punctured (Texas, Tamaulipas). subtinctum Fall (p. 365) Beak slightly longer than head and prothorax combined; prothorax more shallowly, irregularly punctured (Guatemala). subrufum Sharp (p. 363) 55. 56. 57. 58. 60. 61. 62. 64. SUBGENUS TRICHAPION—KISSINGER 257 Mucrones minute; dorsal margin of antennal scrobe evenly descending to below eye (Florida)... .. . « .pervicax Fall (p. 360) Mucrones larger; dorsal margin of lantennan sorebe somewhat angulate above antennal insertion .. . {ieyia., 56 Mucrones short, subangulate (New. Teer Florida, Mieseeiap? Indiana). perforicolJe Fall (p. 343) Mucrones long, simple (Georgia, Florida, Mississippi). importunum Fail (p. 353) Pubescence noticeably denser at base of elytral interval 3; size generally less thanl.6@mm.... Anchen meen earn n eae Uha te: Pubescence on elytra nado size Core ant le a MMe Psa es eS 4D Mucrones projecting at an angle with tibiae; elytral intervals nearly flat (Guerrero; Guatemala) .... . . . perpilosum Wagner (p. 329) Mucrones in basal half projecting in ane with long axis of tibiae; apical half curved out laterally; elytral intervals moderately convex (@abaees: Guate- mala; Panama). . . . . . auriferum Wagner (p. 327) Frovs wider than dorsal ip on Bente nor sulcate; prothorax at base one-fifth wider than long; elytral intervals moderately convex; size 1.6 to 2.0 mm. (Arizona; Baja California, Chihuahua, Guerrero). aequabile Fall (p. 259) Frons as wide as dorsal tip of beak, with shallow median depression; pro- thorax at base one-third wider than ss elytral intervals nearly flat; size greater than 2.1 mm... . SH eeart 260 Middle and hind tibiae with siunjlar’ mucrones, ‘both soutely, angulate ven- trally (Guerrero; Guatemala). . . . . . . . imitator Wagner (p. 286) Middle tibia with a short, acutely angulate mucro, hind tibia with long, slender, straight mucro projecting at about 120° from tibia (Distrito Hederal)s ss 4: . . . . plectrocolum, new species (p. 288) Beak as long or longen tana head and prothorax combined. ..... 62 Beak distinctly shorter than head and prothorax combined. . . . . . 67 Antennae inserted at distance from eye four times as great as width of frons; beak one-fourth longer than head and prothorax; mucro 2 short, subangu- late; mucro 3 long, curved; size 2.25 to 2.50 mm. (Puebla, Michoacdn, Guerrero; Guatemala; Honduras) . . . . . gracilirostre Sharp (p. 352) Antennae inserted at distance from eye not more than twice as great as width of frons; beak at most slightly longer than head and prothorax Combimnedaar cise Sh 2auew eae COS . Size 2.5 to 3.0 mm.; “egal terse ecient as Stone as Eide) not longer than lobes of third segment (New Hampshire, Florida, Texas, Wisconsin). rostrum Say (p. 384) Size generally less than 2.5 mm.; second tarsal segment longer than wide, longer than lobes of third segment. . ... . gan SER A Head excavated and polished ventrally; elytral airine ‘shallow; mucrones minute (Florida; Tamaulipas). . . . . . . gulare Fall (p. 338) Head not excavated ventrally; elytral striae dean: mucrones larger. . . 65 5. Elytra strongly bronzed, intervals polished, nearly impunctate, elytral pubes- cence nearly lacking, scales in striae larger than those on intervals (Guate- mala; Honduras; Colombia; Venezuela; Bolivia). bicolor Gerstaecker (p. 350) Elytra black, not bronzed, intervals with more or less distinct transverse minute rugae, intervals with distinct punctures bearing conspicuous scales as largeras thosedmesttides, . .. . 4 < ).< » # «6 2 2 2 « @ 9 OG 258 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL, 110 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71. 72. 73. 74. 75. 76. Apex of prothorax distinctly constricted; beak slightly punctured beyond middle (México, Distrito Federal) . . . . . mexicanum Wagner (p. 383) Apex of prothorax slightly constricted; beak strongly punctured in rows, tip smoother (Illinois, Kansas, Colorado) . . . . .coloradense Fall (p. 378) Mucrones simple. . . . hat eR a arr LRT ASU eee Mucrones dentate or sarees Seyitaniie ee er ere ee me fC) Size 1.5 mm.; dorsal surface of prothorax deeply, closely, coarsely punctured (Iowa, ne iceratig Kansas) . . . . . .minor Smith (p. 355) Size generally larger than 1.8 mm.; Prioreal aie of prothorax more shallowly muncbtired sc. '0 i ee oe a Antennae inserted at basal two-fifths of beak; beak in dorsal view nearly parallel-sided; prothorax little wider at base than apex (holarctic; North Carolina to New England, west to Washington, south to Utah). simile Kirby (p. 278) Antennae inserted at basal third of beak; in dorsal view beak attenuate toward apex; apex of prothorax seven-tenths as wide as base (Guerrero; Guatemala). .......... .. .hadromerum Wagner (p. 328) Beak shorter and stout, at most slightly longer than prothorax, in lateral view attenuating to apex, more or less suleate laterally; frons not wider than dorsal tip of beak. . ... oc eneeel fe a ee Beak more slender and subparallel apically: Pieuincie fonees nee prothorax, not sulcate laterally; frons generally wider than dorsal tip of beak. . 73 Elytra reddish bronze, legs in part rufous (Veracruz; Guatemala). vinosum Sharp (p. 294) Elytra black, aeneous; legs black. . . ...... : Mer ALi) P70 Beak shorter than prothorax; frons slightly narrower fee ee tip of beak (Veracruz, México, Morelos, Michoacan, Guerrero). glyphicum Sharp (p. 292) Beak slightly longer than prothorax; frons equal to dorsal tip of beak (Baja California)... .....4.2.+.. =... .. .chuparosae Fall (p. 291) Prothorax black, elytra blue; prothorax with noticeable prominence on lateral basal region (Argentina; Brazil) . . .lativentre Béguin-Billecocq (p. 374) Prothorax and elytra of same color, black; lateral basal region of prothorax NOL: Prominent +... oF ek see See : aid Yak: 5, Ao et meme Antennae inserted at distance from eye eerie greater than width of frons; beak in side view nearly parallel-sided in apical third’ (Washington, Wyo- ming, Colorado, Utah, California, Durango, México). proclive LeConte (p. 289) Antennae inserted at distance from eye more than one-half greater than width of frons; beak in side view attenuate to apex ........ 75 Antennae inserted in front of basal third of beak; elytral pubescence uniform; prothorax at middle not narrower than base (New Mexico, Arizona). dolosum Fall (p. 370) Antennae inserted behind basal third of beak; pubescence forming a more or less distinct spot at base of interval 3; prothorax widest at base. . . 76 Size larger than 2.50 mm.; mucrones dentate apically (Puebla, México, Dis- trito Federal, Guerrero). . . . . . .submetallicum Boheman (p. 330) Size about 1.75 mm.; mucrones angulate apically (Tabasco). adaetum, new species (p. 284) SUBGENUS TRICHAPION—KISSINGER 259 Species of Uncertain Position Apion (Trichapion) aequabile Fall FicureE 1,),c,g,7. Apion aequabile Fall, Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc., vol. 25, p. 148, 1898. Description: Length, 1.6 to 2.0mm. Moderately robust. Black; pubescence conspicuous, coarse, white, sparse, coarser and denser laterally. Male beak one-eighth longer than prothorax; deflexed in apical third; in lateral view basal one-third parallel, attenuate through middle third, apical third nearly parallel, five-sixths as thick as basal region; from dorsal view widest in basal third at antennal insertion where it is one-fourth wider than base, attenuate to apex, there three- fourths as wide as base; sparsely pubescent in basal two-thirds, punctures there coarse, apical one-third with fine punctures, shining. Female beak as long as head and prothorax combined, one-half longer than prothorax, slightly curved, apical half nearly cylindrical, somewhat depressed near tip; strongly punctured laterally in basal half, fine scales in two short sulci above antennal insertion, shining and glabrous beyond antennal insertion. Antennae inserted at dis- tance from eye equal to width of frons, of male in basal fourth of beak, of female at basal fifth of beak; first segment slightly shorter than next two, second segment a little longer than third, club 0.18 by 0.06 mm. Eyes moderately prominent; frons wider than dorsal tip of beak, with a wide, flat median area and one lateral row of punc- tures. Prothorax at base one-fifth wider than long, middle as wide as base, apex two-thirds to three-fourths as wide as base; sides with moderate lateral expansion at base, slightly diverging to middle, rounding to constricted apex; in profile dorsal surface very slightly arcuate from base to apex; punctation shallow, sparse, 0.03 mm. in diameter, interspaces about one-half as great as diameter of punc- tures; basal fovea nearly obsolete, elongate. Elytra at humeri one- third wider than prothorax at base, 2.5 times as long as prothorax, length to width as 10:7.5; intervals twice as wide as striae, moderately convex, with two rows of fine punctures bearing fine scales; striae deep. Scutellum narrow, elongate, 0.08 by 0.04 mm. Claws with strong, acute basal tooth. Front femora 3.3 times as long as wide. Special male characters: Tibiae 2 and 3 armed with subdentate mucrones. Typss: I hereby designate the lectotype of this species as the male specimen (MCZ 25071) in the Fall Collection labeled La Chuparosa. Cotypes are in the J. L. LeConte Collection and in the California Academy of Sciences. 260 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 MATERIAL EXAMINED: Lectotype and 30 specimens. KNOWN DISTRIBUTION: Unrrep Strarss: Arizona: Chiricahua Mts., July 4, 1940, D. E. Hardy (UK); Globe (CU); Huachuca Mts., Ramsay Canyon, Cochise Co., July 16, 1948, C. and P. Vaurie (AMNH); Santa Rita Mts., Madera Canyon, beating oak (CU); Santa Rita Mts. (USNM); Whiteriver, July 4, 1950, D. E. Hardy (UK). Mexico: Baja California: La Chuparosa (MCZ, CAS). Chihuahua: Chihua- hua, H. F. Wickham (MCZ). Guerrero: Rio Balsas, H. F. Wickham (TLCC). Apion (Trichapion) aestimabile Waguer Apion (Trichapion) aestimabile Wagner, Arch. Naturg. Berlin, vol. 78, p. 115, 1912. Description: This species was described from a single male in the Wagner Collection which was not seen by the author. The following notes are taken from the original description. Length, 1.8 mm. Very near A. mexicanum Wagner, head much smaller and narrower, frons flat with two rows of fine, scale-bearing punctures. Male beak a little longer than head and prothorax (A. mexicanum beak of male equal to head and prothorax combined), distinctly less curved than A. mexicanum, stouter, distinctly swollen at antennal insertion, thence slightly attenuate. Antennae of male inserted somewhat in front of middle of beak. Prothorax at base one fifth wider than long, sides nearly parallel to middle, strongly constricted at apex, there one- fifth narrower than base; punctation sparser and deeper than A. mexicanum; basal fovea continues on to near apex, but deep only at base. Type Locauity: Veracruz, Mexico. Remarks: The insertion of the antennae somewhat in front of the middle of the beak will distinguish this species from all known mem- bers of the subgenus Trichapion. Apion (Trichapion) albidulum Fall Fiaure 1,d,f,h. Apion albidulum Fall, Journ. New York Ent. Soc., vol. 26, p. 219, 1918. Description: Length, 2.0 to 2.2 mm.; width, 1.00 to 1.12 mm. Robust. Black; densely clothed with appressed white scales, scutellum and beak beyond basal one-fifth glabrous. Male beak slightly longer than prothorax, female beak shorter than head and prothorax combined, one-fourth longer than prothorax; mod- erately evenly curved; dilated at antennal insertion, attenuate to middle, cylindrical beyond middle; coarsely punctured in basal one- half, sparsely punctured apically. Antennae inserted at basal one- fourth, male, at basal one-fifth, female, at distance from eye equal SUBGENUS TRICHAPION—KISSINGER 261 to width of frons; first segment a little shorter than next two, second equal to next three combined, club 0.18 by 0.09 mm. Eyes prominent; frons moderately wide, densely clothed with white scales on either side of bare median sulcus. Prothorax slightly wider at base than long, middle as wide as base, apex three-fourths as wide as base; sides with slight basal lateral expansion, slightly sinuate before base, apex moderately constricted; in profile dorsal surface slightly arcuate; punctation moderately deep, 0.03 mm. in diameter, interspaces about one-half as great as diameter of punctures; basal fovea deep, elongate, a slightly raised longitudinal median carina occurs in apical one-half. Elytra at humeri two-fifths wider than prothorax at base, about 2.5 times as long as prothorax, length to width as 11:8.5; intervals flat, more than twice as wide as striae, with three or four rows of punctures bearing scales; striae moderately deep, with a single row of scales. Scutellum elongate, twice as long as wide, 0.12 by 0.05 mm., with deep, median basal foven. Front femora three times as long as wide. Claws with a large, acute basal tooth. Special male characters: Tibiae 2 and 3 armed with moderately long, straight, denticulate mucrones. MATERIAL EXAMINED: Type, male (MCZ 25073), labeled Coachella, Calif., in Fall Collection; and 25 specimens. KNOWN DISTRIBUTION: UnitEep States: California: Riverside Co., Coachella (MCZ); Palm Springs (CU, UK, USNM). Arizona: Fort Yuma (USNM). Apion (Trichapion) alticola Wagner Apion (Trichapion) alticola Wagner, Arch. Naturg. Berlin, vol. 78, p. 107, 1912 Description: This species was described from a pair of specimens in the British Museum (Natural History) not seen by the author, The following notes are taken from the original description. Length, 2.2 to 2.4 mm. Very near A. imitator Wagner, with different beak and legs. Male beak equal to head and prothorax combined, stouter than A. imitator, more strongly curved, more distinctly widened at antennal insertion, more distinctly attenuate toward apex; female beak much stouter than in A. imitator, only a little longer than head and prothorax, more strongly curved, punctation deeper, denser; at antennal insertion beak of female of A. imitator more distinctly swollen than A. altzcola. Frons striate, middle stria deeper. Legs, especially femora, stouter, tarsus longer as in A. mediocre Sharp. Male mucrones sharper than those of A. imitator, somewhat shorter than those of A. mediocre. Scutellum a little larger than that of A. mediocre, but distinctly smaller than that of A. mitator, deeply grooved, enclosed in a groove. Prothorax and elytra the same as A. tmitator. 262 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 TYPE LOCALITY: Omilteme, Guerrero, Mexico, 8,000 feet (BMNH). Remarks: Wagner’s statement that the elytra of A. alticola are the same as those of A. imitator is accepted literally. The elytral intervals of A. imitator are biserially pubescent. The apparently long beak of this species should distinguish it from related forms. Apion (Trichapion) asellum Wagner Apion (Trichapion) asellum Wagner, Arch. Naturg. Berlin, vol. 78, p. 102, 1912. Description: This species was described from three males from Managua, Nicaragua, one in the Wagner Collection and two in the Solari Collection; this material was not seen by the author. The following notes are a translation of the original description. Length, 1.7 to 1.9 mm. Near preceding species [godmanz], of same body size and general habitus, also same color; but has much larger and denser gray-white pubescence on head, prothorax, and elytra; and denser pubescence on ventral surface and following characters: eye of male distinctly larger; frons somewhat smaller, nearly smooth, indistinctly striate; eyes beneath with snow white cilia. Beak slightly shorter than head and prothorax combined, hardly curved; from above, base to antennal insertion with wrinkled sculpture and single punctures, rather dull; at antennal insertion slightly wider, from there to apex rather strongly attenuate; with rows of punctures on both sides of smooth middle line, gradually becoming finer toward apex; more shining and glabrous toward apex; from side angulately swollen under the antennal insertion, on dorsal line slightly angulate over antennal insertion. Antennae inserted at distance equal to long diameter of eye, otherwise much like godmani. The prothorax is larger in comparison to the elytra, at the bisinuate base only one-sixth wider than long, in front with a slightly uniform constriction, the constriction before the hind angle only a little stronger than that before the anterior margin and rather less than the same in godmani; the punctation is distinctly denser but finer and deeper, the interspaces smaller than the punctures; the basal stria is rather short but deep. The elytra hardly differ, a little wider and from the apex with less sinuation. The scutellum somewhat larger, triangular, deeply grooved. The legs—especially the femur—are similar in length but somewhat stouter; the first tarsal segment distinctly longer and narrower than the second, which is as long as broad; the claws are longer, widely spread, strongly toothed. The male with the second and third pair of tibiae mucronate. SUBGENUS TRICHAPION—KISSINGER 263 Apion (Trichapion) auronitidum Wagner Apion (Trichapion) auronitidum Wagner, Arch. Naturg. Berlin, vol. 78, p. 113, 1912. Description: This species was described from a single female from Capetillo, Guatemala, in the British Museum (Natural History) that was not seen by the author. The following notes are a transla- tion of the original description. Length, 1.8 mm. Closely related to A. subrufum Sharp, somewhat smaller and more compact in form, can be recognized by the following characters: beak of female somewhat shorter, at antennal insertion somewhat more widened and a little more strongly curved. The head is a little wider, the frons with a wide, shallow middle striae and finely, sparsely punctured; the prothorax is of the same general form, but the disc is nearly impunctate, the sides with large, shallow, distant punctures; in front of the scutellum is an indistinct, shallow impres- sion. The elytra in comparison with the prothorax is distinctly shorter than in subrufum, widest point nearly at middle, with strong humeri; striae with finer, shallower punctures, intervals slightly convex, with fine hair-bearing punctures. Legs same as subrufum, only the tibia blackish, while in subrufum the tibia are rusty red. With yellowish pubescence especially on head and prothorax, where it is distinctly longer and somewhat denser than subrufum. Head, prothorax, and elytra with a bright metallic gold luster. De- scribed from a specimen in Sharp’s type series of subrufum, from which it differed by the rust red color of the elytra and prothorax with its slight metallic luster. Apion (Trichapion) bettyae, new species Fiaure 1,¢,7,k Duscrietion: Length, 3.90 mm.; width, 1.75 mm. Moderately robust, depressed. Black; pubescence conspicuous, white, long, fine, somewhat coarser and denser on sides of mesothorax and metathorax. Male beak stout, shorter than prothorax, nearly straight; in lateral view nearly parallel-sided, upper surface abruptly deflexed downward toward tip; in dorsal view tapering from antennal insertion to apex, not expanded laterally at antennal insertion; coarsely, deeply, rather densely punctured, pubescence conspicuous to near tip, tip smoother; dorsal margin of antennal scrobe continues to apical third as a carina overhanging a series of deep punctures which appear to form a sulcus. Female beak equal in length to 483661—59—_2 VOL. 110 ve k Figure 1.—a, Apion laminatum Sharp, lateral view of head (after Sharp, 1890). , c, g, 1, A. aequabile Fall: b, lateral view of head and prothorax of male; c, mucro of tibia 3 of male; g, lateral view of head and prothorax of female; i, entire dorsal view of male. d,f, h, A. albidulum Fall: d, mucro of tibia 3 of male; f, lateral view of head and prothorax of male; h, entire dorsal view of male. ¢, 7, k, A. bettyae, new species: ¢, mucro of tibia 2 of male; 7, lateral view of head and prothorax of male; k, entire dorsal view of male. Line equals 0.50 mm. SUBGENUS TRICHAPION—KISSINGER 265 prothorax, stout, nearly straight; in lateral view ventral surface slopes upward slightly from antennal insertion to apical third, dorsal surface slopes strongly to apex; in dorsal view attenuate strongly from antennal insertion to middle, apical half nearly parallel; sculpture similar to male. Antennae inserted near basal third of beak, male, at basal fourth of beak, female, at distance from eye one-third greater than width of frons; first segment slightly shorter than next four, second equal to next two, club 0.24 by 0.12 mm. Eyes moderately prominent; frons narrower than dorsal tip of beak, with a fine, very deep median sulcus and one lateral row of coarser, more or less sepa- rated punctures. Prothorax at base slightly wider than long, middle narrower than base, apex two-thirds as wide as base; sides beyond basal lateral expansion moderately converging to distad of middle, rounded in apical third to constricted apex; in profile dorsal surface slightly arcuate toward base, strongly arcuate in apical third; puncta- tion deep, 0.06 to 0.08 mm. in diameter, interspaces narrow, sub- cariniform, dull, strongly alutaceous; basal fovae linear, deep, ex- tending one-third length of prothorax. Elytra at humeri one-third wider than prothorax at base, about 2.25 times as long as prothorax, length to width as 10:7; intervals about one-half wider than striae, concave, with one row of rather large, shallow punctures. Front femora 3.7 times as long as wide. Claws with acute basal tooth. Special male characters: Tibia 2 with a short, nearly simple mucro projecting in line with long axis of tibia. Typns: Holotype male (CAS), Atlixco, Puebla, Mexico, May, A. Fenyes Collection. Allotype female, same data as holotype; both mounted on same pin. One paratype, same data as holotype. Remarks: The large size; short, stout beak; and male secondary sexual characters will distinguish this species. I am pleased to name this outstanding species in honor of my wife, Betty, in acknowledgment of her understanding interest during the course of this research. Apion (Trichapion) chalybaeum Wagner Apion (Trichapion) chalybaewm Wagner, Arch. Naturg. Berlin, vol. 78, p. 111, 1912. Description: This species was described from a few specimens in the Solari Collection that were not seen by the author. The following notes are taken from the original description. Length, 1.8 to 1.9 mm. Closely related to A. oscillator Sharp, of same size, shape of pro- thorax and elytra, and color; differs markedly in form of rostrum, which in both sexes is nearly cylindrical, only at the antennal insertion slightly angulate, somewhat stouter especially in female, less strongly VOL. 110 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM 266 ‘safe oAo0ge poqorsysuoo AT} Y BIS ‘saa 0} O80] pojiosur ovuuojue fyBoq jo di} [esiop uvy} JOP “Aypeorde you Jo pepuvdxe ‘paAino ‘Zuo, AlfeyVitspoy_, :ol[Bwogq *xBloyjoid uvy} Josuoy] yonuw you ‘Iopuas AjoyeIopopy :o[Vyy “A[SNOLIVA poeygipou | so ‘(ajeua -o1ontr ¢€ ‘Z% YJIA sun} -1uids ‘snjdoua ‘sadip.sve -]09) oyeuolonu Z BIqly, asanzuids ‘safa dA0gB pezorsysuoo ATTqSIIg “ywoq jo dy [esiop uBy} JepIm yonyy ‘ATTBISIp jou Io popuedxs ‘pacing ‘eeu *xB10y} -o1d uvy} Josu0] ‘Iapue[g ole “BOIB 9YBIIS poysyod yy J] ovrqr ‘aywuoionmr ¢ ‘% ovIqly, ‘sofa aAo0qe poeqotmysuo0d ATSuo01g “yBoq jo diy [esiop usy} JopIm JoN ‘ATTeISIP popued -xo9 Ajsuo0is ‘poaAmo ‘oeuioy *xBioyjoid ueyy JosuoT you “ynojys AJaA :o[B] ‘sofa 2A0q®B pa -yolrjsuoo Ajo7yeV1opoyy "xB0q JO dij [vsiop sv opm sB ynoqy ‘AyTeorde popuvd -xo Aj[su01s ‘poaaing ‘orewoy *xeioyjoid uvyy IaBuo] ‘ynojs ATaYBIBpOTT ‘9B *(oVeUOIONU [[B WIM 2f109) ayeuorion ug ‘Z OBIQIT, | | | ee | ‘sofa oAO0q®B peyorsysuoo AT} YSIS “BOQ ‘AT[VIsSIp popuvdxa eee ee | Nee u0oVeVWKe—ewoosSS | ae=_nw*“?»zaoaeoawooaOo o<“s“ee——————SsS asso esDD aes=$_—000SSawuwaa=onm] poay fo wns.og you ‘peaino ATpVYSIQ :ofewmagq *xeloyyoid uvy} dJesu0o, ‘1apusl[g :o[Byy UNLSOY ayou fo shay Agsty o[twuts uoldy 07 paznjas sdnoi6 saraads fo ssajovunpy)—'% ATAVY, 267 SUBGENUS TRICHAPION—KISSINGER *poyorsysuoo ATPYSIIG "payolsysuod ATPYSTIG ET *Ayyeorde 07BNU9}}B PUB d}VSUOTY :o[BUlA,T "yBoq *xodv ivou 04 jo diy yesiop uvy} septa | Juooseqnd puv ozenusz}yV sole] ‘ayeuoionul & ‘Z% OBIqT, UWNIUIDJAUGNS “AT[VISIP popuvdxe soul} "SUOIJ JO YJPIM OOIM} 4B -oul0s ‘oyesuole A[{BVeIyD 2 [BUI T pejiosul ovuuoqjue ‘yvoq *xeioyjoid uvyy jo diy [esiop uvy} Jopiyy | Josuoy ‘yno4ys ATa}BIepoyy :o[ef ‘opyeuoronu Z BIQL, aujsourjnjound PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 116 268 *popunol A[su0148 Jou sopris ‘tenba ‘diy vou 0} oyendeyye ‘u0y "gn04s Ajayw1opoyy | Jnoqe epplur pus asvg | -iosur [euUueJUR IOAO pepusdxg ‘(eyBuO1ONM [fe wnary -inf ‘wnjsafuor “unpow -uL09) o}BuoIONU & ‘Z OBIQLT, WRAPSOL ‘peylpou A[SNONVA |f Bo] ‘(94BuU -O1OOL [[B YIM wnwop -409) oyeuoIONu g ‘Z VBICLT, ‘pepunod A[su0148 septs ‘UOT}IOSUI ‘yno4s Ajayerepoy] | ‘o[pplu uvy} JoMOIIeU osvg | [vuUEqUe 48 pepuBdxe A[Su0.Ng ‘diy 0} [eormpuly -Ao0 A[rvou ‘uory1sul [euUszUE ‘qnoyg ‘o[pplul Se opiM su oseg | puofkaq payorjsuoa s]ydnuqy ‘OPBUOION UL VBI) [TV u4ngr}qQo BOAO} Teseq qioys YIM ‘ofppru “UOryasut ‘Jopusys ATa}wIepoW | uvy} Jeprm yYyonw aseg | [wUUeJUB J0AO popuRdxe : ; C Pld toe st L rece seen aie mya? ? eke wil HED art Lory ih A Lea BS cai Meee abr Pa Ce, baa bhi Pays), eae ae . ‘oo _ a ee ae : ' : 7 : a Par, uy Ee P ~ 7 urate lesiee| i) bb preteen ey th CO Li toh te oit]f iff Bah | | HE iA pM bal as ; P04 ee ~! a | ; alibi i Pr fi Lor | ler citalt ia y Pat | a = " u My a hats ~ 7 oi int | | \ Sab baker | es arpa Ny’). Teel th! rea cit rete) “Wiest! Se 19 RE - y hg 7 Ai palh iY Pen lay vie fhey il. tal fas, oils, Ae eo ee Soler nalee ia ns ay mnovd Sind SiGient wot sneaks i : bees A Cteahe | : (ecm baal) a ae iGO ; tirsts! wl on nS 1) iva 4 bre lipra aon mil = (yt Pe, thawed nas wa E letehaee 0 y prs altyt! om POU am th feet ghar Te a ee Uae, et iil | sf . u st dios Abt tt abel > dea UP Ty uaa achat tactic Seti saat Gia ati tiie es Se pare ry 9) VET Ete Or eileen gee Ggnideaue sae wos ued a Lapeer ie Apes) TAPER COGS i eel Rioth: Med we ay, wr bn fa (eat? j inn Ty ee ret i) oa thy yertiott ; Fy aeRO) PST SERT Ea at Agi ja se ORT aN Spy isn VEC A aaa rik DL ek natant Me TAL, ib Stine dA iron SOIR y Riot G (i ti - tata af ‘ ie 20 ia ay jane ei ASO Fah PN RHETY ty “iby A ity : A! i \; wi | Be a 5: ri gisfhay nee EDAD pre tc & Uiey ie mI atin gly) paves grin aii! 7 ' - sine ime die othe to) Op ee ee Coan fers ue elias yw i = on ng hens on 4 ; Mins 40 i DHA govubwe att » O8 Garee ceret Rabat Bene nb! z Ber Bar AE Shot Vbiysey a REA Hye DERN EE, zal welt ec. AT ANIE, cepa a (oo aliAl i : PROCEEDINGS OF THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION U.S. NATIONAL MUSEUM Vol. 110 Washington : 1959 No. 3419 A DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FINAL INSTAR LARVAE OF THE ICHNEUMONIDAE (INSECTA, HYMENOPTERA) By J. R. T. SHort! Introduction In this paper are given a description and classification of the final instar larvae of the Ichneumonidae based on a study of species repre- senting 151 genera. Keys are given to the subfamilies, tribes, and genera. Characters of the subfamilies and tribes are described verbally, but the description of each genus usually takes the form of a diagram. Any special features are noted in the text, and when a species differs from that figured for a genus the difference is noted. Diagrams were selected as the most concise and accurate method for recording larval characters. MatTERIAL AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS In work of this nature great care must be taken to insure that only reliably identified material is used. Most of the material on which this study is based comes from the U.S. National Museum, Wash- ington, D.C. I wish to thank the Museum for permission to borrow material and I am most grateful to Miss Luella M. Walkley for her help and advice concerning this work. I am also grateful to Mr. G. 1 Natural History Department, Marischal College, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland. 391 392 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Stuart Walley of the Canadian Department of Agriculture, Ottawa, for supplying material and to Mr. J. F. Perkins of the British Museum (Natural History) for permission to study material and for his advice on the classification of the Ichneumonidae. I also wish to thank Prof. G. C. Varley of the Hope Department of Entomology, Oxford, for his many helpful suggestions and for lending me a number of slides from his collection; Mr. E. R. Skinner of the Imperial Forestry Insti- tute, Oxford, who supplied me with larvae of Rhyssa; and Dr. G. Salt, F.R.S., of the Zoological Department, Cambridge University, who supplied me with larvae of Collyria and Idechthis. Since living larvae often give valuable information, I have collected as widely as possible for this study. Most of the slide preparations have been deposited at the U.S. National Museum. Material borrowed from the Canadian Department of Agriculture and the British Museum has been returned. Most of the material sent by Professor Varley has been returned, but material of Orthopelma and Hemiteles that he did not wish returned has been deposited at the U.S. National Mu- seum. Material of Collyria and Idechthis sent by Dr. Salt and material of Rhyssa sent by Mr. Skinner have also been deposited at the U.S. National Museum. Material returned to the Canadian Department of Agriculture (CDA), to the British Museum (BM), and to Professor Varley (GCV) is indicated by initials. Material not so indicated has been deposited in the U.S. National Museum. Detailed records (by whom determined, locality, etc.) have not been recorded for any specimens since this information can be ob- tained from the data labels of the collections of bred material (now returned to the U.S. National Museum and the Canadian Depart- ment of Agriculture) from which larval skins were obtained. The procedure adopted in using this bred material was as follows: The collection of preparations of larval skins was numbered and fully labeled; when a larval skin was extracted from the cocoon of a bred specimen a label was added to the pin of the specimen reading “Larval skin removed; slide No. X; J.R.T.S.; 195X.’’ Thus, it is possible to refer from the preparation of a larval skin to the adult and its de- termination. Meruops Much of the material used was available as cast skins in the cocoons of bred ichneumonids. The contents of the cocoon, the final instar larval skin and the meconium, were removed by making a longitudinal cut in the cocoon and then boiled in a 5 percent solution of caustic potash. Sometimes larval skins of instars previous to the final were found in the cocoons. After boiling, the cleaned and softened larval skins were washed in distilled water, stretched, dehydrated, and ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 393 mounted in Canada balsam. Balsam was used to ensure a satis- factory permanent mount, but for more rapid work larvae may be transferred from distilled water to Faure’s fluid. Where larval mate- rial was available in the host pupa, as in the Ichneumoninae and Pimplini, the entire pupa was softened by boiling in caustic potash and the pupa was cut open when soft to extract the ichneumonid larval skin. This method ensured that the brittle pupa was not not damaged. Fresh larvae were opened by a midventral cut and then boiled in a 5 percent solution of caustic potash. They were then washed, dehydrated, and mounted. NOMENCLATURE The taxonomy of the Ichneumonidae is in a confused state, and the nomenclature of European and American authors differs to some extent. Since much of the material used in this study is North American in origin, the nomenclature of Walkley (1958) is used. The names of larvae described in the literature have been altered, when necessary, to conform with this nomenclature. When genera were not listed by Miss Walkley, her advice was sought on nomenclature, or, if the genera were listed in Kloet and Hincks (1945), the nomen- clature of these authors was followed. Description and Classification Since the relationships indicated by the larval characters support a classification similar to that given by Townes and Townes (1951) in the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s synoptic catalog and by Walkley (1958) in the supplement to that catalog, the classification of these: authors has been followed. Although a somewhat different classification could have been constructed on the basis of larval structure alone, every effort was made to avoid this because informa- tion on both larvae and adults is essential for an understanding of the taxonomy of the group. A classification based solely on the characters of the larvae would be as unsatisfactory as a classification based solely on the characters of the adults. It was necessary to depart from the classification in the above- mentioned synoptic catalog in one case: The Anomalinae are here considered as a separate subfamily rather than as a tribe of the Ophioninae. Such differences are to be expected since the inde- pendence of larval and adult forms makes a separate evolution possible (Wigglesworth, 1954). Selective factors acting on the legless larvae are different from those acting on the mobile adults. Studies on larval systematics are of interest from two standpoints; they enable workers to identify larvae and they help in understanding the classification of the adults (see van Emden, 1957). It is hoped 394 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL, 110 that the keys to subfamilies and tribes will require no great modifi- cation as a result of future work, which is expected to take the form of detailed studies within tribes and genera. As a result of such work the keys to genera given here will be greatly modified, for the genera studied were usually represented by but two or three species. This number of species might be satisfactory if one could assume that the larval characters of all the species of a genus would indicate a close relationship. This is very far from being the case. In some genera this may be due to species differing more as larvae than as adults. In others, as in the genus Scambus, it appears to be due to the confused state of the taxonomy of the adults. However, it is hoped that the present keys to genera will serve as a basis for future studies. It is generally believed that, since adult insects show a greater degree of differentiation than larvae, their characters are likely to remain more important for species identification (van Emden, 1955). No attempt has been made in the present study to give a key to species. A vast amount of material would be required for such work. But itis significant that species of the braconid genus Apanteles can be arranged into groups corresponding with the groups into which the adults are divided (Short, 1953). EXTERNAL STRUCTURE OF FINAL INSTAR LARVA The final instar ichneumonid larva consists of a hemispherical head, three thoracic segments, and ten abdominal segments. The cranium is lightly sclerotized, with the mandibles and certain bands associated with the mouthparts more heavily sclerotized. The body wall of the thorax and abdomen is very lightly sclerotized or un- sclerotized, with the exception of the spiracles and setae. The spi- racles are situated in most species on the prothoracic and first eight abdominal segments. A line of setae is present in most species encir- cling each thoracic and abdominaJ segment. Small projections are present on the skin and these may be lightly sclerotized. The structures used in¥this classification are the form of the mandibles and head sclerites, and of the antennae, spiracles, and skin. For the basis of the terminology of the head parts, which is outlined below, reference should be made to Short (1952). The head of ichneumonids (fig. 1) is lightly sclerotized except for certain more heavily sclerotized bands strengthening the cranium in the region of the mandibles, maxillae, and labium. The sclerotic arch, which is sometimes present dorsal to the mandibles (md), is called the epistoma (epst). The anterior tentorial pits (at) are situated in the epistoma. Lateral to each mandible is a pleurostoma (plst). The mandible articulates with two processes of the pleurostoma (fig. 1c). The anterior pleurostomal process (app) fits into a cavity of ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 395 the mandible and the posterior pleurostomal process (ppp) ends in a socket which receives the mandibular condyle. The hypostoma (fig. 1B, hst) is a sclerotic band running posteriorly along the subgenal margin of the cranium. Each maxilla (mx) consists of a lightly sclerotized cardo (cd) and a membranous stipes (st) supported ventrally by a sclerotic band called the stipital sclerite (ss(q)). The medial lobe of the maxilla represents the lacinia (lc). The galea is absent. The maxillary palp (mplp) is reduced to a flattened disc. A sclerotic band called the hypostomal spur (hsp) projects ventrally from the hypostoma across the stipes. In many species it fits into a depression in the stipital scierite. Surrounding the posterior margin of the prelabium (plb) is a labial sclerite (Ibs). The labial palps (Iplp) are reduced to flattened discs. The silk press (sp) at the orifice (slo) of the silk glands is usually well sclerotized. Some ichneumonid larvae, such as the Campoplegini, have a Y-shaped sclerite, called the prelabial sclerite, on the prelabium. A sclerotic band, the labral sclerite (Ims), is often present marking the dorsal limits of the labrum (lm). The mandible (fig. 1c) consists fundamentally of a broad base (ba) articulating with the pleurostomal processes, and a more slender blade (bl). The base and blade of the mandible of Xorides are not differentiated, but usually, as for example in the Ephialtini, the blade is slender. The blade of the mandible may bear teeth (t) on its dorsal and ventral surfaces. The antennae (ant) may be papilliform or disc-shaped. The ocular lines (ol), which mark the place of the developing imaginal compound eyes, are often sclerotized. Each spiracle (fig. 1p) consists of a rounded atrium (atr) connected with the closing apparatus (ca) by a length of trachea which is often characteristic of the group to which the larva belongs. Finer details of spiracular structure have not been used in this classification. The prothoracic spiracle is usually figured but, where the preparation did not show the structure of this clearly, another spiracle was selected for illustration. The proportions of the structure of the spiracles are relatively constant. The length of the setae of the skin and the presence or absence of spines have been found useful taxonomic features. Spines serving as holdfast organs are present on the skin of the Polysphinctini and some Ephialtini. The drawings of heads which illustrate this paper are morphologi- cally inaccurate since they show it as a flattened object, whereas it is, in reality, a hemisphere. This point is important since Beirne (1941, pp. 149, 167), for example, has attempted to use the position and degree of curving of the hypostomal sclerite as a taxonomic character. 396 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL, 110 This is unwise since the position and degree of curving of the head sclerites depends to some extent on the position assumed during mounting. However, it has been found a satisfactory method for taxonomic purposes to record the heads from preparations of cast skins and fresh larvae flattened in a standard way. By this method all the head parts can be shown in the one diagram. The size and appearance of the cocoons have not been used in this classification since precise descriptions, either verbally or by drawings, were found very difficult. The color patterns of cocoons should be useful in future taxonomic work within some genera. poc pos cS léec] Figure 1.—Xorides sp.: a, anterior view of head; B, lateral view of head; c, lateral view of mandible; p, spiracle. Explanation of symbols on facing page. Detailed explanation on pages 394, 395. 397 ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT Larval Key to Subfamilies of Ichneumonidae (except Orthocentrinae) i Mandibles unsclerotized and, of the head sclerites, only the pleurostoma and each lateral part of the epistoma are sclerotized; accessory longitudinal tracheal commissure not present fee Se Coliyriinae Mandibles well sclerotized, or, if not, then labial ecleane present; accessory longitudinal tracheal commissure present in thorax ...... . 2 isualral sclerite presentrc(s to3; was y ative tastings) & Ragrotioden an sice 3 Labral sclerite absent?. . . . Agha 5 . Spur of hypostoma meeting stipital eclenes on or near fy 2g eit end or, if not, then with each lateral part of labral sclerite broadened into roughly quadrate area, or with mandible roughly triangular in shape with no clear differentiation between base and blade and with two dorsal rows of large teeth Pimplinae other than Pimplini and Acaenitini Spur of hypostoma not meeting stipital sclerite close to its median end; each lateral part of labral sclerite not broadened into quadrate area; mandible with blade clearly differentiated from base ........... + Epistomal arch lightly sclerotized * Tryphoninae Epistomal arch not sclerotized‘. . Cryptinae 2 Except Opheltes, Protarchus (Mesoleiinae, Mesoleiini). 3 Except Idiogramma (Tryphoninae, Idiogrammatini). 4 Except Gambrus (Cryptinae, Cryptini). ExpLANATION oF SYMBOLS ON Ficure 1 ama: Anterior mandibular articulation ant: Antenna ant sk: Antennal socket app: Anterior pleurostomal process at: Anterior tentorial pit atr: Atrium of spiracle ba: Base of mandible bl: Blade of mandible ca: Closing apparatus of spiracle cd: Cardo clp: Clypeus cs(decl): Coronal stem of dorsal ecdysial cleavage line dfm: Cranial depression associated with origin of frontal muscles epst: Epistoma fm: Food meatus fr: Frons ge: Gena hyph: Hypopharynx hsp: Sclerotic spur of hypostoma hst: Hypostoma Ib: Labium lbs: Labial sclerite Ic: Lacinia Im: Labrum Ims: Labral sclerite Iplp: Labial palp md: Mandible mplp: Maxillary palp mx: Maxilla oc: Occiput ol: Ocular line pa: Parietal region of cranium plb: Postlabium plst: Pleurostoma pma: Posterior mandibular articulation poc: Postocciupt pos: Postoccipital sulcus ppp: Posterior pleurostomal process prib: Prelabium pt: Posterior tentorial pit slo: Salivary orifice sp: Silk press ss(q): Stipital sclerite st: Stipes t: Teeth of mandible vx: Vertex 398 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 10. Las 12. 138. 14. 15. 16. ke 18. 9s Epistomal arch well sclerotized® .... isi At Bae Ae 6 Epistomal arch very lightly sclerotized or Abeent CPt Sed Lee ae ial . Labial sclerite at least moderately sclerotized. . ......... a Labial sclerite never more than very faintly sclerotized. ...... 10 ‘ibabialsclerite complete ventrally = 4 92% 2's eo ene 8 Labial sclerite incomplete ventrally’. . . . 208 9 . Stipital sclerite and hypostomal spur ell sulévotiedl’ Pirnplinae, Pimplini Stipital sclerite and hypostomal spur very lightly sclerotized. Pimplinze, Acaenitini Setae present on prelabium ............... .. Metopiinae Setae absent from prelabium?7 . . f ... . . Anomalinae Mandible with grooved blade bosreainine prominent tooth: hypostoma verv lightly sclerotized; labial palps not disc-shaped . . . . Orthopelmatinaze Mandible without grooved blade containing prominent tooth; hypostoma well sclerotized; labial palps dise-shaped . . . . . . . Ichneumoninae Labial sclerite sharply pcinted ventrally ..... . . . .. Diplazoninae Labial sclerite not sharply pointed ventrally ...... , Ee 12 Mandible with base sclerotized only at periphery .... . Mesuélicbinine Mandible with base evenly sclerotized .. . . . . Slee 13 Stipital sclerite not extending laterally beyond noi of ene with spur of hypostoma. . . . . . . . Plectiscinae Stipital sclerite ex ienhine iebeeale Heed ae of meeting with spur of hypostoma... . gt 14 Mandible with numerous fine ee on odor side i Binder : ‘Adelognassinae Mandible not toothed or with short blunt teeth on dorsal and ventral sides of blades 405 fa: oe 15 Hypostoma not Seats hevand lateral end ot slipitall Heese, or with sclerotic band connecting posterior pleurostomal processes across dorsal surface of food meatus, or with twelve or more setae situated largely within the membrane of the prelabium. .. . . . . . Lissonotinae Hypostoma extending beyond lateral end of epiptieal selerite; sclerotic band not present connecting posterior pleurostomal processes; if numerous setae present on prelabium, they are scattered over a very broad labial sclerite as well as over the prelabial membrane . . . 3 lee 16 Many (more than four) setae scattered over broad jabiall aclefite and on membrane of prelabium .. . . . . . . Ophioninae, Ophionini Not more than four setae on Siento ee . wake A Labial sclerite as wide or wider than long (in RAterOnOcrenion directa) and hypostoma! spur longer than blade of mandible. . . . . Ave 18 Labial sclerite longer than wide or, if not, then length of ispostcnnel spur is equal to or less than length of blade of mandible. Ophicninze, Campoplegini Mandible conical in shape with small tooth at apex. QOphicninae, Tersilochini Mandible not of thisshape. ... . in nee 19 Closing apparatus of spiracle not well Beierotived ana broader than spiracle. Ophioninze, Cremastini Closing apparatus of spiracle moderately sclerotized and as wide as or more narrow than spiracle. .............. . .. Mesoleiinae 5 Except Listrodromus (Ichneumoninae, Listrodromini), Triclistus (Metopiinae), Xanthopimpla (Pim- plinae, Pimplini). 6 Except Evxetastes (Lissonotinae). 7 Except Anomalon (Anomalinae. ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 399 In the following descriptions of larval structure in the various subfamilies, a list of species studied is given. A list is also given of those descriptions in the literature which were thought sufficiently accurate and detailed to help workers in identifying material. The standard of published descriptions of ichneumonid larvae is still poor despite Beirne’s (1941) paper, and many references to descriptions have been omitted since the figures given are too small and vague. The biological notes given for the various subfamilies and tribes are based on those of ‘Townes and Townes (1951) and Walkley (1958). The subfamilies, tribes and genera are considered in the order given by Townes and Townes (1951), or Walkley (1958), except in the case of the Mesochorinae, which are moved from a position following the Anomalinae and placed near the Lissonotinae for reasons stated in the section dealing with the Mesochorinae. The species are considered in alphabetical order. When genera are added to the list of Walkley they are placed near what were thought, on larval characters, to be closely related genera. Subfamily Pimplinae Figures 2-10 On larval characters the Pimplinae fall into two groups; in one are the Pimplini and in the other are the Ephialtini, Polysphinctini, Neoxoridini, Rhyssini, Theroniini, Labenini, and Xoridini. The Acaenitini have a special position. The Pimplini usually have the epistoma well sclerotized, the hypostoma short, and the mandible large and without teeth. The labial sclerite is longer than wide and its ventral side is broad. The labral sclerite is absent. The setae on the skin are small. In the second group the epistoma is, at most, lightly sclerotized, and the hypostoma is long. The mandibles are relatively smaller than in the Pimplini and they usually bear teeth. The form of the mandible is similar in the Ephialtini, Neoxoridini, Rhyssini, and Labenini in having a slender blade and a dorsal and ventral row of small teeth. In the Theroniini and in Delomerista (Ephialtini) the blade of the mandible is bifurcated, one part having dorsal and ventral teeth and the other being toothless. The labial sclerite is basically triangular in shape, although in the Rhyssini and Neoxoridini the labial sclerite is pointed ventrally, and in the Theroni- ini the ventral part of the labial sclerite is broad so that the sclerite resembles that of the Pimplini and Acaenitini. The labral sclerite is present. The setae on the skin are relatively longer than in the first group. The Acaenitini show characters of both groups. The man- dible is similar to that of the Pimplini, and the absence of the labral sclerite and the presence of a sclerotized epistoma also suggest this 400 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 tribe. But the hypostoma is long and the labial sclerite is roughly triangular in shape, although the ventral part of the sclerite is broad as in the Pimplini. In all tribes of the Pimplinae, with the exception of the Labenini and Xoridini, the hypostomal spur meets the stipital sclerite on or near the point of meeting of this and the labial sclerite. In the Pimplini this results in the sclerites around the mandibles having a ringlike appearance. Apart from this one character the groups in the Pimplinae are distinct. Since the Pimplini (with the possible exception of Jtoplectis) are endoparasites which emerge from the pupa of the Lepidopterous host, and the remaining tribes of the Pimplinae (with the possible exception of some Acaenitini) are ectoparasites, differences in larval structure might be expected. The Pimplini, with their large, toothless man- dibles and well-developed epistomal and pleurostomal sclerites resemble to some degree other ichneumonid larvae with similar habits (see pp. 502, 505, 506). Beirne (1941) in his classification of larval Ichneumonidae has placed the Polysphinctini, Rhyssini, Ephialtini, and Xoridini with the Cryptinae. This has not been followed in the present study for, although the Pimplini differ in many aspects from the Ephialtini and similar tribes, the position of the hypostomal spur gives a common character for the subfamily. Where this character is not shown clearly, as in the Labenini and Xoridini, the remaining characters indicate the relationships of the tribe. In the Labenini the form of the mandible closely resembles that of the Ephialtini. In the Xoridini the general form of the head sclerites, particularly the labial sclerite, resembles that of most Pimplinae, rather than any other Ichneumonid group. The form of the mandible of the Xoridini differs from that of all other ichneumonids. It is significant that the Acaenitini and Theroniini show characters resembling those of both the Pimplini and the Ephialtini and similar tribes. LarvaL Kry 1. Setae on body longer than blade of mandible . . . . . . . Polysphinctini Setae on body not longer than blade of mandible. ........... 2 2,. Labial sclerite sharply pointed; ventrally = . <:.. . +.-..17.. 4 fase) eee Labial sclerite not sharply pointed ventrally. .......2..2....4 3. Ventral point of labial sclerite continuous with sclerite. . . . . . Rhyssini Ventral point of labial sclerite appearing as distinct plate at end of sclerite. Neoxoridini 4, Each lateral part of labral sclerite expanded into quadrate-shaped area. Labenini Each lateral part of labral sclerite not expanded into quadrate-shaped area . 5 ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT AQ] 5. Ventral part of labial sclerite broad and without lobes on ventral surface. Theroniini Ventral part of labial sclerite, if broad, has lobes on ventral surface . .. 6 6. Mandible triangular with no sharp differentiation between base and blade. XMoridini Mandible with sharp differentiation between base and blade . . Ephialtini Tribe Ephialtini Figures 2-4 The epistoma is absent except in Tromatobia where it is present as a thin, lightly sclerotized arch; the pleurostoma is lightly sclerotized; the hypostoma is well sclerotized and may be enlarged posterior to the hypostomal spur; the spur of the hypostoma meets the stipital sclerite at its point of meeting the labial sclerite; the stipital sclerite is always present but it may be short; the cardo is visible in some genera as a lightly sclerotized plate; the labial sclerite is roughly triangular in shape; the labral sclerite is present and its median part is lightly sclerotized and often bilobed; the mandible in most genera has a slender blade with a row of fine teeth on the dorsal and on the ventral surfaces (but Tromatobia appears to have only a dorsal row of teeth, and in Delomerista diprionis Cushman the blade is bifurcated) ; the antenna is papilliform; the closing apparatus of the spiracle is narrower than the atrium and is usually separated from the atrium by a length of trachea equal in length to that of the closing appa- ratus, although in Alophosternum the closing apparatus is long and slender; the skin has well developed setae which are usually equal in length to the blade of the mandible; in Tromatobia the setae are very small and groups of spines are present; spines are absent from other genera of the tribe. LaRvAL Kry ho 1. Small lobes present on ventral edge of labial sclerite® . Small lobes not present on ventral edge of labial sclerite : 2. Hypostomal spur as broad as or broader than posterior part of upestania Calliephialtes, Ephialtes co Hypostomal spur more narrow than posterior part of hypostoma . . Seambus 3. Mandible with blade bifureated®. .......... . .. . Delomerista Mandible with blade not bifureated . ... . LN xipit AMS ata atatet Ze 4 4. Enlargement present on posterior part of hy eae renin .... . . Iseropus Enlargement not present on posterior part of hypostoma ....... 5 5. Slender epistomal arch present. . ............. . Trematobia Epistomal arch absent ............. ~~... Alophosternum 8 Except Scambus pomorum (Ratzeburg) (Imms, 1918; Speyer, 1926) and Calliephialtes dimorphus Cush- man (Sauer, 1939). * Except Delomerista sp. (Morris, Cameron and Jepson, 1937). 402 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 a) | WR 3 ate i | Ss.) \ Figure 2.—Pimplinae:Ephialtini, head sclerites: a, Scambus hispae (Harris); 8, Alophos- ternum folticola Cushman; c, Calliephialtes variatipes (Provancher). (1, antenna; 2, spiracle} 3, skin.) ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 403 ; uv Ss O-imm Na 2 3 Ficure 3.—Pimplinae:Ephialtini, head sclerites: a, Ephialtes irritator (Fabricius); 8, Iseropus stercorator brunneifrons (Viereck); c, Tromatobia rufopectus (Cresson). (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.) A404 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 (pon = le O:i mm oon Oa Sa yo 2 3 Figure 4.—Pimplinae:Ephialtini, head sclerites: Delomerista diprionis Cushman. (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.) The above key must be regarded as provisional, for, on the present material, it is very difficult to decide on any one characteristic of a genus. This may be due to the fact that Scambus, to take one exam- ple, is a composite genus. Dr. G.S. Walley (in litt.) has reached such a conclusion on Scambus from study of the adults. Genus Seambus.—S. hispae (Harris) has been examined (fig. 2). S. brevicornis (Gravenhorst) is figured by Thorpe (1930), S. detritus ‘ (Holmgren) by Salt (1931), S. foliae (Cushman) by Dowden (1941), and S. pomorum (Ratzeburg) by Imms (1918) and by Speyer (1926). S. pomorum has neither lobes on the ventral surface of the labial sclerite nor an enlargement on the hypostoma as has S. hispae. S. brevicornis, S. foliae and S. detritus have lobes on the ventral surface of the labial sclerite, but an enlargement is not present on the hypo- stoma. The ventral surface of the labial sclerite of S. detritus is more pointed than in other species. These points are of interest since Tromera pomorum (Ratzeburg) and Epiurus brevicornis (Gravenhorst) are type species of genera synonymized under Scambus. Genus Alophosternum.—aA. foliicola Cushman has been examined (fig. 28). The closing apparatus of the spiracle of this genus differs from others of the tribe in its long slender shape (fig. 282). Genus Calliephialtes.—C. nubilipennis (Viereck) and C. variatipes (Provancher) (fig. 2c) have been examined. Both species possess ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 405 lobes on the ventral surface of the labial sclerite, which is slightly pointed. The more posterior part of the hypostoma is slightly enlarged in C. variatipes but not in C. nubilipennis. The body setae are conspicuously large in C. nubilipennis. C. dimorphus Cushman is figured by Sauer (1939) and lobes do not appear to be present on the ventral surface of the labium, although the figure is too small to show the head structures clearly. Genus E’phialtes.—E. irritator (Fabricius) has been examined (fig. 34). E. elegans (Woldstedt) is figured by Beirne (1942a), H. mani- festor (Linnaeus) by Baumann (1933), “. punctulatus Ratzeburg by Beirne (1941) and Rosenberg (1934), and #. ruficollis (Gravenhorst) by Thorpe (1930). All these species have numerous lobes on the ventral surface of the labial sclerite. Genus Jseropus.—The species of this genus are gregarious. J. californicus Cushman and I. stercorator brunneifrons (Viereck) (fig. 3B) have been examined. The enlargement of the hypostoma is more marked in I. californicus than in I. stercorator brunneifrons. I. stercorator stercorator (Fabricius) is figured by Beirne (1941). Genus TJromatobia.—Species of this genus parasitize the egg cocoons of spiders. TJ. rufopectus (Cresson) (fig. 8c) and 7. zonata (Davis) have been examined. The head sclerites are slender with no lobes on the ventral surface of the labium and no enlargement of the hypostoma. A slight epistoma is visible and teeth appear to be present only on the dorsal surface of the mandible. Maneval (1936) notes the presence of groups of large hooked spines on the dorsal surface of the first seven abdominal segments of Zaglyptus varipes varipes (Gravenhorst). Similar spines are present on the abdomen of Tromatobia (fig. 3c3). These spines, which appear to be holdfast organs, closely resemble the body spines of the Polysphinctini. Like Trombatobia and Zaglyptus, the Polysphinctini are parasites of spiders. Genus Delomerista.—The species of this genus are parasites of the cocoons of sawflies. D. diprionis Cushman has been examined (fig. 44). The bifurcate mandibles may be distinctive of this genus. Morris, Cameron, and Jepson (1937) figure Delomerista sp., where the mandible appears to have the same shape as that of other Ephialtini and a more or less complete epistoma is present. It is unfortunate that the identification was not taken further. | Tribe Polysphinctini Ficure 5 The members of this tribe are parasites of spiders. The setae on the head and body are conspicuously long, the setae on the body being at least as long as the blade of the mandible; the dorsal part of the epistoma is not sclerotized and the pleurostoma is 406 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 O1mm Figure 5.—Pimplinae:Polysphinctini, head sclerites: a, Hymenoepimects sp.; B, Oxyrrhexis carbonator texana (Cresson); c, Zatypota sp., antenna not visible on preparation. (Il, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.) ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 407 lightly sclerotized ; the hypostoma is well sclerotized and in Ozyrrhezis and Acrodactyla (Beirne, 1941) is expanded at the posterior end; the hypostomal spur is well sclerotized, as is the stipital sclerite which is expanded at its posterior end in Hymenoepimecis and Oxyrrhexis; the labial sclerite is roughly square in shape in Zatypota but roughly triangular in other genera, although the ventral part of the sclerite is pointed in Zatypota and Acrodactyla; the maxillary and labial palps each have one sensillum in Hymenoepimecis, Oxyrrhexis and Acrodactyla, but there. are two sensilla to each palp in Zatypota; the labral sclerite is lightly sclerotized in its lateral parts but is unsclerotized dorsally; the mandible is slender and small teeth are present on the dorsal surface of the blade; the antenna is papilliform; the closing apparatus of the spiracle is close to the atrium; long setae are present on the skin; spines, which appear to serve as holdfast organs, are present on the dorsal surface of some body segments. It is not possible to distinguish the precise distribution of these spines from cast skins. Nielsen (1923, 1935, 1936) figures and describes the distribution of these spines in the tribe but gives no adequate figure of the head structure of the larvae. LARVAL Kry 1. No enlargement present on posterior part of hypostoma . . Hymencepimecis Enlargement present on posterior part of hypostoma........ 2 2. Lateral end of stipital scleriteexpanded. ... ......... Oxyrrhexis Lateral end of stipital sclerite not expanded. . .. ........ 3 3. Ventral part of labial sclerite with small dorsal projection into prelabial ATCA mere cae Seng he ain eae epi, cuktecee Mee EMR, eb when tN odie Zatypota Ventral part of labial sclerite without dorsal projection. . . . Acrodactyla The following have been examined: Hymenoepimecis sp. (fig. 5A), Oxyrrhexis carbonator terana (Cresson) (fig. 5B), and Zatypota sp. (fig. 5c). Acrodactyla degener (Haliday) is figured by Beirne (1941). Tribe Pimplini Figures 6, 7 The members of this tribe are endoparasites of a variety of lepi- dopterous pupae. The head sclerites are distinctive in that they appear to form a ring around the mouth. The epistoma is well sclerotized, except in Xanthopimpla; the pleurostoma is well sclerotized and the hypostoma is short in most species; the hypostomal spur is well sclerotized and the stipital sclerite is short in most species; the labial sclerite is longer than wide with thin lateral parts and a broadened ventral part; the mandible is relatively large and has no teeth on the blade; the labral sclerite is absent and in some genera the sensilla of the labrum 504675592 408 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Ps O-1.mm 3 Figure 6.—Pimplinae:Pimplini, head sclerites: a, Pimpla aequalis Provancher, antenna not visible on preparation; B, Apechthis compunctor (Linnaeus). (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.) SHORT | 409 ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE Figure 7.—Pimplinae:Pimplini, head sclerites: a, Xanthopimpla stemmator (Thunberg); B, Itoplectis behrensii (Cresson); c, Echthromorpha notulatoria (Fabricius). (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.) 410 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 are grouped on certain raised areas; the hypopharynx has numerous small spine-like projections; the antenna is disc-shaped with the circumference lightly sclerotized in some genera, and several sensilla may be visible in the central part of the antenna; the atrium of the spiracle is broad and shallow and the closing apparatus is close to the atrium; the skin is relatively smooth and has small setae. LaRvaL Kry 1. Hypostomal spur with lightly sclerotized lateral expansion . . Xanthopimpla Hypostomal spur without lightly sclerotized lateral expansion. . .. . 2 2. Hypostoma approximately equal in length to blade of mandible . Apechthis Hypostoma much shorter than blade of mandible. . ........ 3 3. Stipital sclerite much shorter than blade of mandible. ..... Itoplectis Stipital selerite approximately equal in length to blade of mandible. . . 4 . Broadened (ventral) part of labial sclerite about as broad as long and not pointed? ventrally 9 3 2%. yuh P ean 2 ee ee ee eset ees oe Pimpla Broadened (ventral) part of labial sclerite longer than wide and pointed VETIballiy ys 14s, cetaeeeerast wos Se fe? GL mee mee ce et eee eta ereiele Eehthromorpha = Genus Pimpla—P. aequalis Provancher (fig. 6A) and P. inflatus Townes have been examined. P. instigator (Fabricius) is figured by Beirne (1941) and by Meyer (1922), P. luctunosa Smith by Itawa (1950), P. turionellae (Linnaeus) by Thorpe (1930), Silvestri (1941), and Beirne (1943), and Pimpla sp. by Beirne (1942). Genus Apechthis—A. compunctor (Linnaeus) (fig. 6B) has been examined. ‘This species is figured by Beirne (1941). Genus Itoplectis—The species of this genus may be primary or secondary parasites. Professor Varley (in litt.) informs me that I. maculator (Fabricius) appears to be more often a primary parasite on Tortrix and other species, although sometimes a secondary para- site. J. behrensii (Cresson) (fig. 7B) and J. conquisitor (Say) have been examined. J. alternans (Gravenhorst) is figured by Morris, Cameron, and Jepson (1937), J. olivalis Thomson by Beirne (1941), and Jtoplectis sp. by Snodgrass (1935). Morris, Cameron, and Jepson (1937) state that the inner aspects of the teeth of J. alternans are armed with bristles. Teeth have not been recorded on the blade of the mandible in any other species of this tribe. These authors studied this species as a primary parasite of Diprion. It oviposited on pre- pupae and pupae within the host cocoon and fed externally. All other genera of the Pimplini appear to be endoparasites. Genus Echthromorpha.—E. insidiator (Smith) and EF. notulatoria (Fabricius) (fig. 7c) have been examined. £. formosa (Smith) is figured by Beirne (1941). Genus Xanthopimpla.—The broad and lightly sclerotized hyposto- mal spur and the lightly sclerotized epistoma are characteristic of this genus. The stipital sclerite is short and fused with the hypostomal ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 411 spur. X. cera (Cameron), X. enderleini Krueger, and X. stemmator (Thunberg) (fig. 74) have been examined. X. pedator (Thomson), figured by Beirne (1941), differs from other species of the genus in that the lateral parts of the labial sclerite are very broad; however, the hypostomal spur and the stipital sclerite appear to be similar to those of other species. X. citrina (Holmgren) is figured by Moutia and Courtois (1952). Tribe Neoxoridini FIGuRE 8a The only species of this tribe examined was Neozorides borealis (Cresson) (CDA) (fig. 84). Members of this genus are parasites of wood-boring Coleoptera. The dorsal part of the epistoma is unsclerotized but the pleurostoma and hypostoma are well sclerotized; the hypostomal spur has a broad dorsal part but narrows ventrally where it fuses with the narrow stipital sclerite; the lateral end of the stipital sclerite is Y-shaped; the ventral part of the labial sclerite is broad and pointed, although the point appears as a separate cap on the remainder of the labial sclerite; the maxillary and labial palps each have two sensilla, one round and one crescentic in shape; only the lateral parts of the labral sclerite are well sclerotized; the mandible has a slender blade and a dorsal and ventral row of small teeth, thus resembling the mandibles of the Ephialtini, Rhyssini and Labenini; the antenna is papilliform; the atrium of the spiracle is funnel-shaped and the closing apparatus is close to the atrium; the skin has setae of moderate size but no spines. Tribe Rhyssini Figure 8B Species of this tribe parasitize wood-boring Coleoptera and sawflies. The only specimen examined was Rhyssa sp. (fig. 8B). The dorsal part of the epistoma is not sclerotized and the pleuro- stoma is lightly sclerotized; the hypostoma and hypostomal spur are well sclerotized and the hypostomal spur is broad at its dorsal end; the stipital sclerite is well sclerotized and is broad at its lateral end; the labial sclerite is sharply pointed ventrally; the maxillary and labial palps each have two sensilla, one round and one crescentic; the dorsal part of the labral sclerite is not sclerotized; the mandible has a slender blade with a dorsal and ventral row of small teeth; there is a small, lightly sclerotized plate on the clypeus; the antenna is papil- liform; the atrium of the spiracle is funnel-shaped and the closing apparatus, which has relatively thick walls, adjoins the atrium; the skin has setae of moderate size but no spines. FRhyssa sp. is figured by Beirne (1941). A12 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Ficure 8.—Pimplinae, head sclerites: a, Neoxorides borealis (Cresson) (Neoxoridini); 8, Rhyssa sp. (Rhyssini). (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.) ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 413 Tribe Theroniini FIGURE 9A The only species examined was Theronia atalantae (Poda) (fig. 94). The species of Theronia are usually primary and secondary parasites of the pupae of Lepidoptera. The dorsal part of the epistoma is unsclerotized and the pleurostoma is lightly sclerotized; the hypostoma and hypostomal spur are slender and well sclerotized; the stipital sclerite is lightly sclerotized and a very lightly sclerotized cardo is present; the lateral parts of the labial sclerite are slender and well sclerotized and the ventral part is broad and lightly sclerotized; each maxillary and labial palp has two sensilla, one round and one crescentic in shape; the labral sclerite is present; the mandible has a broad base and the blade is bifurcated with one part bearing dorsal and ventral teeth and the other, which projects posteriorly, being toothless; the antenna bears a small papillus; the closing apparatus of the spiracle has slender walls and adjoins the atrium; the skin bears setae approximately equal in length to that of the toothed part of the blade of the mandible and has no spines. The mandible and the labial sclerite of the final instar larva of T. atalantae are figured by Meyer (1922). Tribe Labenini FiGurE 9B The only species examined was Labena grallator (Say) (fig. 98). Species of the genus Labena parasitize wood-boring Coleoptera. The dorsal part of the epistoma is very faintly sclerotized; the pleurostoma is well sclerotized and has a lightly sclerotized lateral expansion; the hypostoma is well sclerotized and has a lightly sclerotized posterior expansion; the hypostomal spur is well sclerotized ; the stipital sclerite is V-shaped with its lateral part expanded and curved dorsally; the labial sclerite is similar in shape to that of many Ephialtini, but there are no lobes on the ventral surface; on each maxillary and labial palp there are two sensilla, both round and one smaller than the other; the labral sclerite is distinctive with each lateral part bearing a quadrate-shaped expansion and the median (dorsal) part being unsclerotized except for a small, lightly sclerotized plate; the antenna is papilliform; the atrium of the spiracle is oval in shape and the closing apparatus is thick-walled and situated close to the atrium; the skin has setae of moderate size but no spines. 414 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Ficure 9.—Pimplinae, head sclerites: a, Theronia atalantae (Poda) (Theroniini); B, Labena grallator (Say) (Labenini). (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.) ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT A15 Tribe Xoridini Figure 10a Species of this tribe parasitize wood-boring Coleoptera. Xorides insularis (Cresson) and X. rileyi (Ashmead) (fig. 104) have been examined. In the genus Xorides the dorsal part of the epistoma is not scle- rotized, but the pleurostoma, hypostoma, hypostomal spur, and stipital sclerite are well sclerotized; the labial sclerite is roughly triangular in shape; the maxillary and labial palps each bear two sensilla, one round and one crescentic in shape; the labral sclerite in both species examined does not have the dorsal part sclerotized and each lateral part consists of two sclerotic bands which join ven- trally; the mandible is distinctive with a broad blade bearing two rows of large teeth on the dorsal surface; the antenna is papilliform; the spiracular atrium is oval in shape and the closing apparatus is close to the atrium; small setae but no spines are present on the skin. Ischnoceros rusticus (Geoffroy) is figured by Berine (1941), Xori- descopus sp. by Ayyar (1943), X. brachylabris (Kriechbaumer) by Chrystal and Skinner (1931), Xorides praecatorius (Fabricius) by Beirne (1941), and Xorides sp. by Short (1952). All specimens de- scribed in the literature appear to have the labral sclerite consisting only of a single sclerotic band and not double as in the species figured in the present paper. Chrystal and Skinner show small lobes on the ventral surface of the labial sclerite of X. brachylabris. The labium thus resembles those of some Ephialtini. These authors also record that there is no striking difference between the larva of this species and that of X. irrigator (Fabricius) which they also examined. These lobes have not been recorded on the labium of any other species of this tribe, although Ayyar figures what appears to be a sclerotic plate beneath the ventral surface of the labial sclerite in Xoridescopus. It is unfortunate that this figure is poor and on bad paper. Tribe Acaenitini Figure 108 Members of this tribe are parasites of wood-boring Coleoptera. The only species of this tribe examined was Arotes formosus Cresson (fig. 108). Cushman and Rohwer (1921, p. 392) state that the group is ectoparasitic. The complete epistoma, toothless mandible and small skin setae of Arotes suggest that it is an endoparasite, although the larval characters of Coleocentrus, as figured by Baumann (1933), suggest that this genus is an ectoparasite. 416 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL. MUSEUM VoL. 110 roo. o> AY oan oo PN Oo co he Erol oa \y: . i Se eo tay, gal / ( , O-imm 3 Ficure 10.—Pimplinae, head sclerites: a, Xorides rileyi (Ashmead) (Xoridini); B, Arotes formosus Cresson (Acaenitini), antenna not visible on preparation. (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.) ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 417 It has been already noted that the Acaenitini have characters similar to those of the two groups of the Pimplinae, the Ephialtini and similar tribes, and the Pimplini. In the genus Arotes the epistoma and pleurostoma are moderately sclerotized and broad; the hypostoma is moderately sclerotized but very slender; the hypostomal spur is broad and very lightly sclerotized ; the stipital sclerite is short, broad and very lightly sclerotized; the labial sclerite is roughly triangular in shape, but the ventral part is much broader than the lateral parts as in the Pimplini; the maxillary palps each bear one large, round sensillum and a group of smaller sensilla; each labial palp bears one large round sensillum and one small sensillum; the labral sclerite is absent and there are two prom- inent groups of sensilla on the labrum; the mandibles resemble those of the Pimplini in having a large blade and no teeth; the antennae were not visible on the specimen; the spiracular atrium is oval, and the closing apparatus, which is relatively long and with thin walls, is situated adjacent to the atrium; the skin has very small setae but no spines. Coleocentrus excitator (Poda) is figured by Baumann (1933). The antenna of this species appears to be disc-shaped. The epistoma appears to be incomplete, but the figure given is too small to make this point clear. Subfamily Adelognathinae Figure 11a Members of this subfamily are gregarious external parasites on sawfly larvae. Adelognathus and related genera have been placed as a tribe of Tryphoninae by some authors. In the present study it was found necessary to consider this group as a subfamily since the form of the mandible, the absence of an epistoma and a labral sclerite, the presence of a prelabial sclerite and of a clearly papilliform an- tenna '’ and the absence of spines on the skin all separate Adelognathus from other genera of the Tryphoninae. I have been unable to dis- cover whether Adelognathus possesses the stalked egg that is charac- teristic of the Tryphoninae. The ovaries of an adult were examined and the eggs present did not appear to be stalked. Adelognathus britannicus Perkins (GCV), A. pallipes (Gravenhorst) (GCV) and Adelognathus sp. (@CV) were examined. The dorsal part of the cranium is sufficiently sclerotized to appear dark; the epistoma is unsclerotized except for small projections above 10 A papilliform antenna is present in Hybophanes scabriculus (Gravenhorst) and Phytodietus pulcherrimus (Cresson) (Simmonds, 1947) of the Tryphoninae. The antenna was not visible in the specimen of P. pulcherrimus examined in the present study. In the remainder of the Tryphoninae the antenna is not papilliform, although a relatively large, rounded sensillum may be present in the middle of the disc-shaped antenna as in Jdiogramma. 418 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 pam icilamnly all Moab ii Wea ea IL { @ @ B e wp =O) ie atine: be a : A aus © Nites - ps O-imm 1.—Head sclerites: Adelognathus pallipes (Gravenhorst) (Adelognathinae); B, (Tryphoninae:Phytodietini), antenna not visible on (Say) (Tryphoninae:Phytodietini). (1, antenna; 2, Ficure 1 Phytodietus pulcherrimus (Cresson) preparation; c, Netelia geminatus spiracle; 3, skin.) ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 419 the anterior pleurostomal processes; the pleurostoma is lightly scler- otized; the hypostoma, hypostomal spur and stipital sclerite are well sclerotized; the labial sclerite is well sclerotized and the lateral parts meet the ventral almost at right angles; a prelabial sclerite is present; each maxillary and labial palp bears two sensilla, one round and one crescentic in shape; the mandibles are distinctive, being large with a long broad blade having a row of fine teeth on the dorsal edge; the labral sclerite is absent; the antenna is papilliform; the closing apparatus of the spiracle is long and slender and is separated from the atrium by a length of trachea equal in length to the atrium; the skin bears small setae but no spines; small bubble-like projections are present on the skin, but these are not pointed and sclerotized as in the Tryphoninae and cannot be called spines. Beirne (1941) figures Adelognathus sp. indescr. Subfamily Tryphoninae Figures 11B—-13p Members of this subfamily are ectoparasites and the tribes are closely related. The eggs are attached to the skin of the host by a stalk (by other structures in some Cteniscini) and the parasite larva completes its development in the host cocoon. The head sclerites are all well developed, although the epistoma is only slightly sclerotized in the Phytodietini and the prelabial sclerite is absent; the mandibles are of moderate size and may bear teeth on the dorsal edge of the blade or teeth may be absent; the antenna is disc-shaped with one to three sensilla in the center; the closing ap- paratus of the spiracle is slender and is situated some distance from the atrium, except in Netelia where the closing apparatus is as broad as the atrium and adjoins the atrium; large setae and small spines are present on the skin, except in Hzenterus where the spines are conspicuously large and are about half as long as the setae. LarvaL Kry 1. A lightly sclerotized plate is present on the labium ventral to the labial sclerite. Phytodietini A lightly sclerotized plate is not present on the labium ventral to the labial sclerite’= 242 SY SUE ESTEE CL AL Ded TEES, TEED 2. Dorsal part of epistomia najecleratized” - 2... . . . . . Idiogrammatini Dorsal part of epistoma sclerotized. . . . . Sochy sthieop eee 3. Labial sclerite slender with width much less alan ae of sania sclerite. Boéthini Labial sclerite relatively broad with width approximately equal to that of StiPlcalesCleritet permet cet es Beet n wey veo sema Coane! ss bcc tan neem eee 420 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 4. Mandible without teeth; setae on body with length equal to one-third to one- halfthat of mandibles. 4.0 ses 2 6) se eee et eee eC Lemiseran Mandible with teeth," or, if without teeth, then setae on body large with length equal to approximately three-quarters that of mandible. . ...... 5 5. Mandible with teeth; maxillary and labial palps each with three sensilla, or, if not, then with two sensilla, one round and one crescentic . . Thymaridini Mandible without teeth, or, if with teeth, then maxillary and labial palps each with two sensilla both of which areround . ..... .. . . Tryphonini Tribe Phytodietini Figure 118,c The members of this tribe are parasites of caterpillars. The egg is attached to the host by a stalk and most of the larval development occurs after the host spins its cocoon or makes a pupal cell in the eround. The lightly sclerotized plate situated on the labium ventral to the labial sclerite is characteristic of this group. In contrast to the other tribes of the subfamily the dorsal part of the epistoma is very lightly sclerotized. LARVAL KeEry 1. Closing apparatus of spiracle narrow and separated from atrium by a length of trachea equal to length of closing apparatus. . . . . . . Phytodietus Closing apparatus of spiracle broad and situated adjacent to atrium . Netelia Phytodietus pulcherrimus (Cresson) (fig. 118), Netelia exserta (Cush- man), and N. geminatus (Say) (fig. 11c) have been examined. The labral sclerite of N. exserta differs from that of N. geminatus in that the dorsal part consists only of a single sclerotic band and the lateral parts do not end in forked enlargements. This is of interest since Townes and Townes (1951) place exserta in the subgenus Pros- thodocis, whereas geminatus is placed in the subgenus Netelza. There is a relatively large, round sensillum in the center of the antenna in Netelia. The sensillum is, however, much smaller than the papillus of a papilliform antenna, and the antenna of Nef¢elia is best described as disc-shaped. Phytodietus pulcherramus (Cresson) is figured by Simmonds (1947), and P. gelitorius (Thunberg) and Netelia vinulae (Scopoli) are figured by Beirne (1941). Simmonds does not figure the sclerotized plate on the labium of P. pulcherrimus. ‘This is presumably an oversight. Beirne describes a lower row of small teeth near the tip of the blade of the mandible in Netelia. This row of teeth was not seen in the species of Netelia examined. 11 Teeth are present on the mandible of Erromenus dolichops Townes and Townes (‘Tryphonini) but they are very small. This species (fig. 134) may be distinguished from the Cteniscini by the shape of the mandible. ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 4?1 Tribe Thymaridini (= Eclytini) Figure 12,8 Members of this tribe are parasitic mostly on small Lepidoptera. Eclytus ornatus Holmgren is a parasite of Tenthredinidae. The species examined were /. ornatus Holmgren (CDA) (fig. 124), E. pleuralis (Provancher) (CDA), Hybophanes scabriculus (Grav- enhorst) (GCV) (fig. 128), and Neliopisthus elegans (Ruthe) (GCV). All the head sclerites are present with the exception of the prelabial and the dorsal part of the labral sclerite is absent in Hybophanes and Neliopisthus; the epistoma is slender in Helytus but relatively broad, although lightly sclerotized, in Hybophanes and Neliopisthus; the lat- eral parts of the labial sclerite meet the ventral almost at right angles in Kelytus but the ventral part of this sclerite is rounded in Hybophanes and Neliopisthus; in Hybophanes and Eclytus ornatus each maxillary and labial palp has three sensilla, one large, one small and one minute, but in EF. pleuralis each palp has two sensilla, one round and one cres- centic; the mandible has a prominent row of teeth on the dorsal sur- face of the blade; the closing apparatus of the spiracle is small and the length of trachea which separates it from the atrium is twice as long as the closing apparatus in Eelytus and three times as long in Hybophanes and Neliopisthus; the setae on the skin are prominent, especially in Hybophanes and Neliopisthus, and there are small spines. Eclytus fontinalis Holmgren is figured by Beirne (1941). LARVAL KEY 1. Setae on skin of thorax equal in length to blade of mandible . . . . Eelytus Setae on skin of thorax as long as or longer than hypostoma. ....... 2 2 Epistoma sharply arched. .f so 205 eee yk ye os ew eh Hybophanes Epistoma not sharply. arched... syne f-fhs 2-5 swe ste SF Neliopisthus Tribe Idiogrammatini Figure 12c Idiogramma sp. was examined. The species of this genus are parasitic on the larvae of NXyela feeding in the staminate cones of Pinus. Idiogramma is an isolated genus showing no close resem- blance to other Tryphoninae. The dorsal part of the epistoma is unsclerotized; the pleurostoma is very lightly sclerotized; the hypostoma, hypostomal spur, stipital sclerite and labial sclerite are moderately sclerotized; each maxulary and labial palp has two sensilla; there is no prelabial sclerite; the silk press is very lightly sclerotized; a labral sclerite is present; the man- dibles are distinctive in shape, each having a somewhat square base and a curved toothless blade; the antenna has a large central sensillum t 22 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 sacl siete Sc Daae KU AAMT aan A AS A +——_—____+ aK O:imm 3 Ficure 12.—Tryphoninae, head sclerites: a, Eclytus ornatus Holmgren (Thymaridini), antenna not visible on preparation; B, Hybophanes scabriculus (Gravenhorst) (Thymari- dini), with skin showing prothoracic setae and spines; c, [diogramma sp. (Idiogrammatini). (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.) ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 423 but is not clearly papilliform; the closing apparatus of the spiracle is separated from the atrium by a length of trachea approximately equal to the depth of the atrium; the skin bears small setae and spines. It is possible that Jdiogramma should be placed in a subfamily of its own since the shape of the mandible and the incomplete epistoma separate this genus from other Tryphoninae. However, since the epistoma is partly sclerotized dorsal to the anterior tentorial pits, a labral sclerite is present, the antenna is not papilliform, and the eggs are stalked, the genus has been placed with the Tryphoninae. The structure of the spiracles and the presence of distinct spines on the skin are characteristics similar to those of many Tryphoninae. The characters of Jdiogramma do not resemble those of any other sub- family of the Ichneumonidae. Tribe Boéthini FIGuRE 134 Boéthes sp. was examined. Members of this genus are parasitic on the larvae of argid sawflies. All the head sclerites are present with the exception of the prelabial; the labial sclerite is slender and its lateral parts meet the ventral almost at right angles; each maxillary and labial palp bears two sensilla, both round and one large and one small; two groups each of four sensilla are present on the labrum; the mandibles are without teeth; the antenna is disc-shaped with a prominent sensillum in the center; the length of trachea separating the closing apparatus of the spiracle from the atrium is almost equal to that of the closing appara- tus; the skin bears large setae and small spines. Tribe Tryphonini FIGurRE 138,c Members of this tribe are parasites of the larvae of Tenthredinidae. Polyblastus pedalis (Cresson) (CDA) (fig. 133), Hrromenus bedardi Provancher (CDA), and EF. dolichops Townes and Townes (CDA) (fig. 13c) have been examined. All the head sclerites are present with the exception of the pre- labial; the ventral part of the labial sclerite is pointed or curved so as to give the sclerite an oval to round appearance; each maxillary and labial palp bears three sensilla in Pulyblastus and two in Erromenus; the mandible is without teeth in Polyblastus but has small teeth in Erromenus: the disc-shaped antenna has two sensilla; the distance of the closing apparatus of the spiracle from the atrium is about equal in length to the closing apparatus in Polyblastus, but the distance is about twice the length of the closing apparatus in Hrromenus: small spines are present on the skin of both Polyblastus and Hrromenus, but 504675—59 —3 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 424 O:! mm ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 495 2 Ficure 13.—Head sclerites: a, Boéthes sp. (Tryphoninae:Boéthini); 8, Polyblastus pedalis (Cresson) (Tryphoninae:Tryphonini); c, Erromenus dolichops Townes and ‘Townes (Tryphoninae:Tryphonini); p, Exenterus canadensis Provancher (Tryphoninae:Cteniscini) ; E, Brachycyrtus pretiosus Cushman (Cryptinae:Brachycyrtini), antenna not visible on preparation. (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.) 426 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VoL. 110 the length of the skin setae is equal to three-quarters of the length of the mandible in Polyblastus, whereas in Erromenus the setae are small and equal to one-fifth of the length of the mandible. LARVAL Kry 1. Mandible without teeth; three sensilla on each maxillary and labial palp. Polyblastus Mandible with teeth; two sensilla on each maxillary and labial palp. Erromenus Tribe Cteniscini Figure 13p Members of this tribe parasitize the larvae of Argidae, Tenth- redinidae and Diprionidae. LEzenterus abruptorius (Thunberg), £. adspersus Hartig, £. canadensis Provancher (fig. 13D), H. claripennis Thomson, and £. tricolor Roman have been examined. All the head sclerites except the prelabial are present; the lateral parts of the labial sclerite meet the ventral almost at right angles; each maxillary and labial palp has two sensilla, both round, one large and one small; the mandible is without teeth; the antenna is disc-like and has three prominent sensilla; the closing apparatus of the spiracle is long and slender and its distance from the atrium is roughly equal to the length of the closing apparatus; spines are conspicuous on the skin and their length is about half that of the setae. The following are figured in the literature: Hxenterus abruptorius (Thunberg) (Morris, 1937), E. adspersus Hartig (Beirne, 1941), £. tricolor Roman (Morris, Cameron, and Jepson, 1937). Subfamily Cryptinae (= Gelinae) Figures 135-27, 64 Most members of this subfamily are ectoparasites but some are, or can be, endoparasites. Mr. J. F. Perkins (in litt.) has informed me that in Polytribaz (Aptesini) the parasites emerge from the pupa of the host. Rosenberg (1934) states that he reared Cryptus sexannulatus Gravenhorst and Agrothereutes batavus Vollenhoven from cocoons within the host pupae, but that when he reared the larvae of these species they fed externally on host larvae. In this very uniform group, the head sclerites are, in general, well developed, although the prelabial sclerite is absent and the epistoma is very lightly sclerotized and is slender and more or less incomplete dorsally, except in Gambrus where the dorsal part is broad and com- plete; the pleurostoma is usually very lightly sclerotized; the labial ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 427 sclerite is roughly triangular in shape in most genera, but, as stated below, this sclerite may be circular or otherwise modified; the silk press is well sclerotized and conspicuous and two small sensilla are often visible just beneath the external opening of the press; each maxillary and labial palp usually bears two sensilla, one round and one crescentic in shape, although three or more sensilla are present in some genera; the labral sclerite is usually lightly sclerotized in its dorsal part and this part may be enlarged; the mandibles are rela- tively small in most genera, except in the Aptesini where they are of moderate size; teeth may be present on the dorsal and ventral surfaces of the blade of the mandible, on the dorsal surface only, or teeth may be absent; the antenna is usually papilliform, although it is disc-shaped in some Hemitelini; the closing apparatus of the spiracle may be some distance from the atrium or it may be close to the atrium; the skin bears setae and small projections which may be sufficiently sclerotized to appear as spines. LARVAL Kry 1. Hypostoma posterior to hypostomal spur shorter than hypostomal spur. Brachycyrtini Hypostoma posterior to hypostomal spur at least as long as hypostomal spur. .2 2. Mandible with a long slender blade bearing a row of fine teeth along entire lengthrofidorsal surfacentit “tse 6s ss ee oye eee oa Mandible not of thisform .. . Seen re 3. Teeth on dorsal surface of blade ‘or mendinle eee ihan fectte on ventral surface!2 which are very small and few in number, except in Ihembobius (fig. 214) where the blade of the mandible is short, broad and well sclerotized with length equal to one third of that of base of mandible and width of lateral end equal to one third of width of base ... . . . . Aptesini If teeth present on dorsal and ventral surfaces of blade of eons and teeth on dorsal surface markedly larger than teeth of ventral surface, then ventral teeth numerous and blade of mandible longer and more slender than in Rhembobius, with length greater than one third of that of base of mandible and with width of lateral end less than one third of thatofbase ..... 4 4. Closing apparatus of spiracle separated from atrium by length of trachea at least equal to length of closing apparatus, or, if not, then epistoma not sclerotized dorsal to anterior tentorial pits . ...... . . Hemitelini Closing apparatus of spiracle adjoining atrium, or if not, then at least part of epistoma dorsal to anterior tentorial pits lightly sclerotized 14. . Cryptini 12 Except Cubocephalus where the form and position of the closing apparatus of the spiracle differentiates this genus from Cryptini with a similar type of mandible and either the form of the labial sclerite or the form and position of the closing apparatus of the spiracle differentiates this genus from Hemitelini with a similar type of mandible. 18 Except Trychosis, Mallochia and Lymeon (Cryptini). The following characters will distinguish these genera from the Aptesini: the form of the labial sclerite in Trychosis, the sharp dorsal bend of the lateral end of the stipital sclerite in Mallochia, and the heart-shaped dorsal sensillum on each labial palp in Lymeon. 14 Except Pseudischnus. 428 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Tribe Brachycyrtini FIGURE 13,5 Brachycyrtus pretiosus Cushman (fig. 13,5) was examined. Members of the genus Brachycyrtus are parasitic in the cocoons of Chrysopidae. The Brachycyrtini have been placed by some authors in a tribe of the Pimplinae. From a study of the adults, Walkley (1956) reached the conclusion that the group fits best in the Cryptinae, but that additional material and knowledge might prove that it belongs in a subfamily of its own. The larval characters support this conclusion. The form of the mandibles and head sclerites resemble those of the Cryptinae rather than any other group. The position of the hypostomal spur differs from that of the Pimplinae other than the Labenini and Xoridini. The form of the labral sclerite differs from that of the Labenini. The form of the mandible differs from that of the Xoridini in that the blade is relatively longer. The group is an isolated one on larval characters, and the short hypos- toma is distinctive. The form of the hypostoma resembles that of the Sphecophagini to some extent, although the hypostoma of the Brachycyrtini is considerably shorter than that of the Sphecophagini. The head of Brachycyrtus is small and delicate and the antenna was not clearly visible on the preparations made. It appears to be dise-shaped. Tribe Hemitelini (= Gelini) Fiaures 14-19, 64 Members of this tribe attack a great variety of hosts. Many are occasionally or habitually secondary parasites. The most conspicuous characters of the tribe are the poorly developed epistoma and the distance of the closing apparatus of the spiracle from the atrium. LARVAL Kry 1. Mandible without teeth . Mandible with teeth . ait : 2. Each ventrolateral part of labial aclnite eeeaieds Labial sclerite not of this shape . 3. Ventral end of hypostomal spur broader than orsale Isdromas peruviana (Viereck) Own bd Ventral end of hypostomal spur narrower than dorsal. . . ‘ 4 4. Mandibles with relatively broad blades, the tips of which da non sce in the median line. . . . . . . . . Isdromas lycaenze (Howard) Mandibles with relatively narrow ipiedes the tips of which meet in the median line! asexcivaets So a ale See. Joos: RE AOe, diek copie ee ar 5. Dorsal part of abel nalerite moneda bo aed dé Ac Aten ere Srilpaus Dorsal part of labral sclerite not pointed. ....... . . Atractodes 10. Wale 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 1 18. ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 429 . Labial sclerite round in shape and with lateral parts not meeting ventral approximately atright angles... . ... . . Thaumatotypus Labial sclerite not round in shape and aii lateral parts meeting ventral approximately atrightangles. .. . ... . . Phygadeuvon . Mandible with teeth only on dorsal eeniace of pie THe Coe at, rae! TS Mandible with teeth on dorsal and ventral surfaces of blade ™. .... I1 . Teeth few in number and relatively large. . . .... =... +. Bathythrix Teeth smallandfine. .. . Aapaney Mtaaee et Ge ae, . Two sensilla present on each masilary acl fatal palp ... . . Otacustes Sensilla not as above. .. . Rois ha, tee teeny MUD Three sensilla, two large amd! one ervey meet on each maxillary and aisle pallor eg ses el osc ... . . Mastrus molestae (Uchida) One large sensillum civuated dort and two or three small sensilla situated ventrally in the form of a crescent on each maxillary and labial palp. Thysiotorus Labial sclerite approximately circularin shape. ..... . . Ethelurgus Labial sclerite not approximately circular in shape; lateral parts meet ventral approximately at right angles... . Ao ds ocean ble Papillus of antenna reduced to disc feanne three Pane sada a Say foe eel selaix Antenna not of thisshape. .. . UL eee areas Two sensilla present on each mamiltars and labial Saree SR SOM ee (5) Sensilla not as above. . . . HR er Two sensilla of equal size Poeeee eile one or tive sivatlcn seviciiln present on each maxillary and labial palp. ... . Marae oe es: One large ventral sensillum and a dorsal group Ge prince sensilla present on each maxillary and labial palp. . . . . . . Mastrus smithii (Packard) Dorsal sensillum on each maxillary and labial palp larger than ventral. Endasys Dorsal sensillum on each maxillary and labial palp smaller than ventral or equal in size to ventral. .... ray oop doe ees Gee LO Pleurostoma more lightly sclerotized than enoctonay Gelis tantillus (Cresson) Pleurostoma as well sclerotized as hypostoma............ 17 Labral sclerite with single median expansion. . . ... . . Hemiteles Labral sclerite not expanded in its median part and w an two small dorsolateral expansions. . . . . . . Mastrus argeae (Viereck) Mandible with raanded oe And rebar short blade. Gelis bruesii (Strickland) Mandible with a conical base and relatively long slender blade . . Phobetes Of the characters used in the above key, the form of the labral sclerite and its degree of sclerotization is not a good one. In some cases the character is clear, but in others it may be obscured when the entire length of the sclerite has not been forced into the one plane during mounting. However, since the tribe is extremely uniform and the labral sclerite does differ in shape and degree of sclerotization in dif- ferent genera, it was found necessary to use this character. 15 Teeth on the ventral surface of the blade of the mandible are usually very small and must be looked for with great care. 430 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 ) fronmli J i Be Ge > ye 2 O:1mm 3 Ficure 14.—Cryptinae:Hemitelini, head sclerites: a, Bathythrix sp., antenna not visible on preparation; B, Mastrus molestae (Uchida); c, Otacustes sp. (1, antenna, 2, spiracle; 3, skin.) ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 431 BA enon Od Ba SRR RASS O-1mm Ficure 15.—Cryptinae:Hemitelini, head sclerites: a, Ethelurgus syrphicola (Ashmead); B, Isdromas peruviana (Viereck); c, Isdromas lycaenae (Howard). (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.) 432 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 2 O:-1 mm 3 Ficure 16.—Cryptinae:Hemitelini, head sclerites: a, Thaumatotypus paradoxus (Zetter- stedt); B, Phobetes thyridopteryx (Riley). (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.) ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 433 wan bn nb —- Raieyai~ Tn laliwn a Nox Ficure 17.—Cryptinae:Hemitelini, head sclerites: a, Gelis tantillus (Cresson); 8, Hemiteles areator (Panzer); c, Endasys subclavatus (Say). (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.) 434 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 3 2 O-tmm Figure 18.—Cryptinae:Hemitelini, head sclerites: a, Thysiotorus sp.; B, Phygadeuon subfuscus Cresson; c, Iselix sp. (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.) ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 435 a Ficure 19.—Cryptinae:Hemitelini, head sclerites: Stilpnus anthomyidiperda Viereck. (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.) +} O:-{mm 3 The following have been examined: Bathythriz sp. (fig. 14a), Mastrus argeae (Viereck), M. molestae (Uchida) (fig. 148), M. smithii (Packard), Otacustes sp. (fig. 14c), Ethelurgus syrphicola (Ashmead) (fig. 154), [sdromas peruviana (Viereck) (fig. 158), I. lycaenae (How- ard) (fig. 15c), Thawmatotypus paradoxus (Zetterstedt) (fig. 16a), Phobetes thyridopteryx (Riley) (fig. 168), Gelis bruesit (Strickland), G. tantillus (Cresson) (fig. 174), Hemiteles areator (Panzer) (fig. 178), Endasys subclavatus (Say) (fig. 17c), Thysiotorus sp. (fig. 184), Phy- gadeuon subfuscus Cresson (fig. 188), Jseliz sp. (fig. 18c), Stilpnus anthomyidiperda Viereck (fig. 194), Atractodes sp. (GCV) (fig. 64a). Of these specimens, Mastrus molestae (Uchida) differs from the other species of this genus examined in that the mandibular teeth are small and are present only on the dorsal surface of the blade. M. smithii (Packard) has one large sensillum and a group of smaller sensilla on each maxillary and labial palp and M. argeae (Viereck) two sensilla. In the two species of /sdromas examined the mandible is basically similar and the ventrolateral part of each labial sclerite is expanded. There are, however, many differences between these species. The larval characters of Gelis, Hemiteles, and Endasys indicate a close relation- ship. Members of the genus Gelis attack various small cocoons, 436 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 including those of Ichneumonidae and Braconidae, and many para- sitize the egg cocoons of spiders. Phygadeuon, Iselix, Stilpnus, and Atractodes resemble each other in larval characters and all are parasites of muscoid Diptera. Dis- tinctive features of Atractodes are that the head and the base of the mandibles are lightly sclerotized and the well-sclerotized blade of the mandible is toothless, the several very small ridges present on the dorsal surface of the blade not being distinct enough to be called teeth. The antenna, like that of Stilpnus, is disc-shaped, but Stdpnus differs from Atractodes not only in the key characters but also in having the blade of the mandible more slender, the ventral part of the labial sclerite more sharply narrowed in the median line, and the posterior end of the hypostoma straight instead of slightly bent towards the dor- sal surface (compare figs. 19 and 64). The following are figured in the literature: Otacustes crassus patruelis (Cushman) (Clancy, 1946), Gelis melanocephala (Schrank) (Beirne, 1941), G. tenellus (Say) (Clancy, 1946), Hemiteles areator (Panzer) (Morris, Cameron, and Jepson, 1937), H. hemipterus (Fab- ricius) (Salt, 1931), H. simillimus (Taschenberg) (Blunk, 1952). Tribe Aptesini Figures 20-214 Most of the members of this tribe are parasites of sawflies. Char- acteristics of the larvae are the development of the lateral parts of the epistoma dorsal to the anterior tentorial pits and the relatively large mandibles. The teeth on the dorsal surface of the blade of the mandi- ble are larger than the teeth on the ventral surface in Aptesis and Rhembobius but not in Cubocephalus. LARVAL Kry 1. Teeth on the dorsal surface of the blade of the mandible not markedly larger than: teeth: on.the) ventral'surface 4.1 ..4t) dimen}. 2195: Cubocephalus Teeth on dorsal surface. of blade of mandible larger than teeth on ventral STITEACC ccs sisiate Mae yea Ive oe yon hata artes nas ha dads ec bed sos sonics Elec aeis AoE 2 2. Blade of mandible short, broad, and well-sclerotized, with length approximately equal to one-third of that of base of mandible. . ... . Rhembobius Blade of mandible relatively slender with length approximately equal to one- halfi of thatoftbase of mandible 4 Ou.u WiUAsTe GEIR: 8G 28 e Aptesis The following have been examined: Cubocephalus sp. (fig. 20a), Aptesis indistincta (Provancher) (fig. 20B), A. pteronorum (Graven- horst), and Rhembobius abdominalis (Provancher) (fig. 214). The teeth on the dorsal surface of the blade of the mandible of A. pteronorum are smaller than in A. indistincta. ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 437 teh A (SAUL A on O:imm 3 Ficure 20.—Cryptinae:Aptesini, head sclerites: a, Cubocephalus sp.; B, Aptesis indistincta (Provancher). (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.) 438 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 t—————II O:1mm 3 Ficure 21.—Cryptinae, head sclerites: a, Rhembobius abdominalis (Provancher) (Aptesini); B, Sphecophaga thuringiaca Schmiedeknecht (Sphecophagini). (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.) ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 439 The following are figured in the literature: Cubocephalus abdominator (Gravenhorst) (Rosenberg, 1934), C. brumatae (Silvestri) (Silvestri, 1941), Aptesis basizonia (Gravenhorst) (Morris, Cameron, and Jepson, 1937). Tribe Sphecophagini Figure 2138 Members of this tribe are parasitic in the nests of Vespula and Polistes. The mandible is characteristic with its long slender blade bearing a row of fine teeth along the entire length of the dorsal surface. Sphecophaga thuringiaca Schmiedeknecht (BM) (fig. 2138) and Sphecophaga sp. (CDA) were examined. Sphecophaga vesparum (Curtis) is figured by Beirne (1941) and Sphecophaga sp. by Snodgrass (1935). Tribe Cryptini (= Mesostenini) FIGURES 22-27 Members of this tribe are parasitic mostly on pupae and prepupae, or on larvae concealed in tunnels or leaf rolls. Hosts include Lepi- doptera, Symphyta, Aculeata, and spider eggs. The larvae have the lateral parts of the epistoma well developed and, in many genera, the closing apparatus of the spiracle adjoins the atrium. LarvaL Kry 1. Epistoma lightly sclerotized, broad and complete. . ... . . Gambrus Epistoma lightly sclerotized, narrow and more or less incomplete dorsally . 2 2. Labial sclerite with each ventrolateral part indented... . . Trychosis Labial sclerite not of thisform .. . Me AAPG Zar Weteo uclg har eee ete 3. Closing apparatus of spiracle adjoining Meriuea: Sis et ERM alter e ese: Closing appratus of spiracle not adjoining atrium. . . Selena LO 4. Dorsal part of labral sclerite expanded into three Henly pclenotized lobes. Cryptus Dorsal part of labial scleritenot-of thisformys.. . <<... . 205... 2°98 Deapixisetac) On prelabium™“2-prnes sas noma es. Bech a fis Sl, odes aes) 6 Four setae on prelabium. .. . s Aa A ot ands 6. Median-dorsal part of labral sclerite sah Honl, pelerotiaed enlancement! Goryphus Median-dorsal part of labral sclerite without enlargement .. . . Mesostenus 7. Dorsal part of labral sclerite divided into two lightly sclerotized bars. Polycyrtus Dorsal part of labral sclerite not divided into two bars. ....... 8 8. Mandible with a relatively slender blade bearing a row of fine teeth on the dorsal surface and teeth on ventral surface few and small. . Mallechia Mandiblemotvotthis forms \hemae ee ff eas SR pad ee Rucae eee Ono 504675—59—_4 440 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 ———} ; O:1mm 3 2 qv Figure 22.—Cryptinae:Cryptini, head sclerites: a, Cryptus albitarsus albitarsus (Cresson); B, Mesostenus sp. nr. gracilis Cresson; c, Polycyrtus semialbus (Cresson), antenna not visible on preparation. (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.) ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 44] Figure 23.—Cryptinae:Cryptini, head sclerites: a, Trychosis sp.; B, Gambrus canadensis (Provancher). (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.) 442 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 b ° ee ’ — Stes 1 Cc ce e Deane O-{mm 2 b--nene Ficure 24.—Cryptinae:Cryptini, head sclerites: a, Goryphus inferus (Szepligeti); 8, Hoplo- cryptus incertulus Cushman, antenna not visible on preparation. (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.) ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 443 SS O-imm 2 i) Ficure 25.—Cryptinae:Cryptini, head sclerites: Nippocrypius suzukii (Matsumura) (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.) | Bey Ae a el a el a a ~ =~ Ce 9. Width of closing Se of spiracle ee equal to half width of SUEMUMA es ass . .. . . Agrothereutes Width of closing AOD atts of Asn more filan half width of atrium. Eripternimeorpha 10. Ventral row of teeth on mandible poorly developed. . . . .. . Lymeon Ventral row of teeth on mandible well developed. . ... . ae pte meerralel| 11. Epistoma not sclerotized dorsal to anterior tentorial pits . . . Pestiditehens Epistoma sclerotized dorsal to anterior tentorial pits... . eco ereap les 12. Six large setae on labrum... . Re MEN re Bea F otc hs Hoplocryptus More than six large setae on jabrum ee ae eae rae 13. Dorsal part of labral sclerite with three fences Releronzed inpes . . Echthrus Dorsal part of labral sclerite with one lightly sclerotized lobe . Nippoecryptus The following have been examined: Cryptus albitarsus albitarsus (Cresson) (fig. 22a), Mesostenus gracilis Cresson, Mesostenus sp. nr gracilis Cresson (fig. 228), Polycyrtus semialbus (Cresson) (fig. 22c), Trychosis sp. (fig. 234), Gambrus canadensis (Provancher) (fig. 238), @ stokesi Cameron, Goryphus inferus (Szepligeti) (fig. 244), Hoplocryptus incertulus Cushman (fig. 248), Nippocryptus suzukii (Matsumura) (fig. 25a), as bana At a a in Raa _———— O:{ mm Ficure 58.—Ophioninae:Cremastini, head sclerites: a, Cremastus ferrugineus Davis; B, Eiphosoma batatae Cushman. (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.) ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 495 the labial sclerite is incomplete ventrally. The skin is lightly sclero- tized with small projections and small setae. LARVAL Key 1. Each lateral part of the labial sclerite with a small projection towards the MECIANGMMC. Usp rend slowest TRE pee ke hae ari ae ica Eiphosoma Each lateral part of labial sclerite without small projection towards median VaTIG irs: 5 Se rectpeeir eh ogee hen then ad ue is be aera es 2 2. A very lightly sclerotized epistoma present. . . Zaleptopygus, Cremastus pistomarnot sclerotized, 4s <2 2 Bee us oC A a 3 3. Hypostoma bent in the middle of itslength. ........ Pristomerus Hypostoma bent at point one third of length from median end . Xiphosomella Pristomerus euryptychiae Ashmead differs from the drawing in figure 57A in that there are two groups each of two sensilla on the labrum. Cremastus minor Cushman differs from the drawing in figure 58a in that the ventral part of the labial sclerite is lightly sclerotized. It was not found possible to differentiate Zaleptopygus and Cremas- tus on larval characters. The following have been examined: Pristomerus austrinus (Townes and Townes), P. euryptychiae Ashmead, P. pacificus appalachianus Viereck, P. vulnerator (Panzer) (fig. 574), Xtphosomella stenomae Cushman (fig. 578), Zaleptopygus flavo-orbitalis (Cameron) (fig. 57¢), Z. gallaecola (Cushman), Z. rosae (Cushman), Zaleptopygus sp., Cremastus carpocapsae Cushman, C. epagoges Cushman, C. facilis (Cresson), C. ferrugineus Davis (fig. 584), C. forbesi Weed, C. minor Cushman, Hiphosoma annulatum Cresson, E. batatae Cushman (fig. 588), H. insularis (Viereck), E. texcanum Cresson. The following are figured in the literature: Pristomerus vulnerator (Panzer) (Goidanich, 1931; Rosenberg, 1934), Zaleptopygus flavo- orbitalis (Cameron) (Bradley and Burgess, 1934), Cremastus interruptor Gravenhorst (Thorpe, 1930; Beirne, 1941). Tribe Tersilochini FIGuRE 59 This tribe, the larvae of which are endoparasites, resembles the Cremastini and many Campoplegini in essential structure, but the mandible is distinctive with its conical shape and small tooth at the apex. The head sclerites are slender and lightly sclerotized. As in most Cremastini, the stipital sclerite has no lateral expansion. The labial sclerite is broader than long and is incomplete ventrally. The ventral part of the prelabial sclerite is absent and several large sensilla are present on the ventral edge of this sclerite. The maxillary and labial palps are relatively large. The spiracle is of the usual shape in the Ophioninae with a lightly sclerotized closing apparatus adjoining 496 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 D Ry cee — y ¢ YEA Ase Da Soa: = 2 ———| 3 Figure 59.—Ophioninae:Tersilochini, head sclerites: Tersilochus argentinensts (Blanchard) (antenna not visible on preparation; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.) the atrium. The skin has relatively long setae, approximately equal in length to one-third the length of the mandible, but the projections on the skin are small. Tersilochus argentinensis (Blanchard) (fig. 59) and J. conotracheli (Riley) were examined. IT. conotracheli is figured by Cushman (1916) and Tersilochus sp. by Beirne (1941). Tribe Ophionini Fiaure 60 a, B Members of this tribe are endoparasitic in larger caterpillars, except that Ophion bifoveolatus Brullé is known to parasitize larvae of Phyl- lophaga (Scarabeidae). Species of Ophion and Enicospilus are noc- turnal or crepuscular and are frequently attracted to lights. This is a distinctive tribe although it resembles other tribes of the Ophioninae in many basic features. The head sclerites are broad and moderately sclerotized. The stipital sclerite has a small lateral expansion and a lightly sclerotized cardo is present. The ventral part of the labial sclerite forms a broad plate. The prelabial sclerite is triangular in shape with the ventral part reduced. Numerous setae are present on the labrum, on the maxilla lateral to the hypos- tomal spur and on the prelabial membrane and the labial sclerite. The mandibles are distinctive, being relatively small and with a rounded base and a slightly or strongly curved blade. The antenna is disc-shaped. The closing apparatus of the spiracle is lightly sclerotized and adjoins the atrium. The skin has very small setae and small projections. ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 497 2 Ficure 60.—a, x, Ophioninae:Ophionini, head sclerites: A, Ophion idoneum Viereck; B, Eni- cospilus arcuatus (Felt). c, Anomalinae:Anomalini, head sclerites, Anomalon sp., antenna not visible on preparation. (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.) 498 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 = ee a a pit CSE ts 3 O-1mm Ficure 61.—Anomalinae:Gravenhorstiini, head sclerites: a, Aphanistes hyalinus (Norton), antenna not visible on preparation; 8, Barylypa insidiator (Foerster), antenna not visible on preparation; c, Labrorychus analis (Say). (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.) ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 499 See ee Arn er AA SARE EAT A AAR ARRS NO. Ficure 62.—Anomalinae: Gravenhorstiini, head sclerites: a, Atrometus clavipes (Davis); B, Agrypon sp.; c, Blaptocampus nigricornis (Wesmael). (Antenna not visible on prepara- tion; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.) 500 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 O:imm Ficure 63.—Anomalinae:Therionini, head sclerites: a, Therion circumflexum (Linnaeus); B, Heteropelma fulvicorne Townes, antenna not visible on preparation. (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.) . ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 501 LARVAL KEY ie Mandible) witht bladetshehbthyycurved( $6 2.)05 if)2 fy exude) Se cya. ne Ophion Mandible with blade strongly curved so that the tip points dorsally. Enicespilus The following were examined: Ophion ancyloneura Cameron, O. bilineatus Say, O. idoneus Viereck (fig. 60a), O. tetyri Packard, Enicospilus americanus (Christ), /. arcuatus (Felt) (fig. 608), E. glabratus (Say), EH. horsfeldi Cameron, E. purgatus (Say), 7. texranus (Ashmead), and Enicospilus spp. In Enicospilus americanus the blade of the mandible, although of the Enicospilus form, is not so strongly curved as in figure 608. A lightly sclerotized plate is present on the ventral edge of the labrum of some species of Hnicospilus. This should not be confused with the suspensorium of the hypopharynx which is also visible in several species. The following are figured in the literature: Thyreodon atricolor (Olivier) (Cushman, 1947), Enicospilus macrurus (Drury) (Beirne, 1941), FE. purgatus (Say) (Cushman, 1947), Enicospilus sp. (Moutia and Courtois, 1952), and Ophion idoneus Viereck (Cushman, 1947). Subfamily Anomalinae Fiaures 60c-63 This endoparasitic group usually has been placed as a tribe of the Ophioninae. The larval characters of those species examined differ markedly from the characters of the Ophioninae and the group has therefore been treated as a separate subfamily. The form of the labial sclerite is generally similar in the Anomalinae and Ophioninae and, although this might indicate some sort of general relationship between the two groups, the form of the remaining sclerites and the mandibles differs sharply. The epistoma, pleurostoma, and hypostoma are broad and well sclerotized; the hypostomal spur is absent; the stipital sclerite curves dorsally from the labial sclerite to meet the hypostoma; the labial sclerite is relatively slender and is incomplete ventrally except in Anomalon where the ventral part is moderately sclerotized, and in Heteropelma where the ventral part is very lightly sclerotized; the maxillary and labial palps each have two sensilla, one large and one small, except in Anomalon where the two sensilla are approximately equal in size, the dorsal being flat and the ventral peglike; the silk press is sclerotized; a lightly sclerotized prelabial sclerite which lacks a ventral projection is present in some genera; the labral sclerite is absent, but large sensilla which are grouped in various patterns are present on the labral area; setae are reduced and labral and prelabial setae appear to be absent except in Anomalon; the mandibles are large with relatively straight blades which lack teeth except in 502 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL, 110 Anomalon, and the blade of each mandible is well sclerotized; the antenna is disc-shaped; the closing apparatus of the spiracle is lightly sclerotized and adjoins the atrium; the skin has small projections and small setae. The larval characters of the Anomalinae are strikingly like those of the Metopiinae. The larvae of the two subfamilies may be distin- guished by the presence of setae on the prelabium of the Metopiinae and the absence of these setae in the Anomalinae except Anomalon, a genus having so many special features as to be readily recognizable. The reduction of the labial sclerite and hypostomal spur in the Anomalinae, Metopiinae, and Ichneumoninae might be correlated with the relatively slight cocoon spun by these endoparasites. In the head of the final instar larva of Xorides muscles are present which insert on the labial sclerite (Short, 1952, p. 41, fig. 8a). The con- traction of these muscles tilts forward the dorsal end of the pre- labium with the opening of the silk glands. In this action the labial sclerite rotates on the extremities of the stipital sclerites. The labial sclerite is thus held so that movement can take place in only one plane. The spurs of the hypostomae, which articulate with the stipital sclerites, hold the maxillae rigid. The spinning of the cocoon has been observed in Xorides and the region of the prelabium contain- ing the opening of the silk glands was tilted forward during this process. It is therefore possible that the reduction of a cocoon is accompanied by a reduction of the muscles which evert the dorsal end of the prelabium and a reduction of the labial sclerite and hypos- tomal spur. One objection to this suggestion is that the Pimplini, which emerge from the pupa of a lepidopterous host and have only a slight cocoon, have a well developed hypostomal spur and labial sclerite. However the stipital sclerite is reduced and this might be associated with the reduction of the cocoon since, when being everted, the labial sclerite rotates on the stipital sclerite. LARVAL Kry 1. Blade of mandible with teeth; setae on prelabium....... Anomalini Blade of mandible without teeth; setae absent from prelabium... . 2 2. Width of epistoma along entire length and width of pleurostoma along entire length equal to at least half length of mandible. ...... Therionini Width of epistoma or part of width of pleurostoma less than length of man- ible Zaee Oe Vo NSE A aay adore ome ete Gravenhorstiini Ophionellini ” Tribe Anomalini Figure 60c The general form of the head sclerites, spiracles, and skin places Anomalon with the genera of the tribes Gravenhorstiini and Therionini; 29 Of Cushman (1947). ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 503 but it does not appear to be a close relationship, a conclusion which Walkley (in litt.) has also reached from study of the adults. Anomalon differs from the other Anomalinae examined in that the blade of the mandible bears distinct teeth; there are setae on the prelabium; and the ventral part of the labial sclerite, although not as well sclerotized as the lateral parts, is nevertheless distinctly sclerotized. It is also possible that the hypostomal spur might be represented in Anomalon by a small projection from the anteroventral part of the hypostoma. Anomalon therefore can be considered to have an isolated position within the Anomalinae. The larval habits also distinguish this genus from other Anomalinae in that larvae of Elateridae appear to be the usual hosts, whereas the hosts of the other Anomalinae examined were lepidopterous. Anomalon sp. (60c) was examined. A. eyuncidum Say is figured by Cushman (1947). Tribe Ophionellini Ophionellus foutst (Cushman) is figured by Cushman (1947). This figure is not sufficiently detailed to allow the Ophionellini to be dis- tinguished from the Gravenhorstiini. Tribe Gravenhorstiini Fiaures 61, 62 LARVAL Kry 1. Labral sensilla arranged in two separate groups. ... . . . . Atrometus Labral sensilla arranged in single line... . a ane” 2. When head sclerites mounted flat on slide then siete ends a hypostomae extend to point approximately level with ventral end of labial sclerite . . 3 When head sclerites mounted flat on slide then posterior ends of hypostomae do not extend to point level with ventral end of labial sclerite. . ... 4 3. Width of pleurostoma at anterior pleurostomal process approximately equal to two-thirds length of mandible. . .. . ... . . Aphanistes Width of pleurostoma at anterior plearostoreal neoges much less than two- thirds length of mandible. . .. . . . . . . Labrorychus 4. Hypostoma with sclerotized expansion Alone encire dorsal edge . . Barylypa Hypostoma without sclerotized expansion along entire dorsal edge. . . . 5 5. Length of blade of mandible less than half width of base and arising from ventral surface of base. . . . . . . Blaptocampus Length of blade of mandible arorna tele equal Ko half width of base and arising from* middie of bases. 2th). 2. ee. Oe 2 SY Agrypon The following have been examined: Aphanistes hyalinus (Norton) (fig. 614), Barylypa insidiator (Foerster) (fig. 618), Labrorychus analis (Say) (fig. 61c), ZL. prismaticus (Norton), Labrorychus sp., Atrometus clavipes (Davis) (fig. 624), Agrypon sp. (fig. 628), Blaptocampus nigricornis (Wesmael) (GCV) (fig. 62c). 504675—59 8 504 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 The following are figured in the literature: Trichomma enecator (Rossi) (Rosenberg, 1934), Aphanistes armatus (Wesmael) (Beirne, 1941), Blaptocampus nigricornis (Wesmael) (Beirne, 1941). Tribe Therionini Figure 63 LarvAL Kry 1. Ventral part of labial sclerite lightly sclerotized. ...... Heteropelma Ventral part of labial sclerite not sclerotized. .......... Therion The following have been examined: Therion morio (Fabricius), T. circumflecum (Linnaeus) (fig. 63a), Heteropelma fulvicorne Townes (fig. 638). Therion morio (Fabricius) is figured by Cushman (1947). Interrelationships between the Subfamilies Although in many cases the larval characters suggest interrelation- ships which are very similar to those which are believed to be shown by the characters of the adults, there are certain discrepancies. Some similar adults, such as the Pimplini and Ephialtini, have very different larvae. These differences may be correlated with the fact that the larvae of the Pimplini are endoparasitic while those of the Ephialtini are ectoparasitic. The larval characters of the Ephialtini and similar tribes of the Pimplinae resemble those of other ectopara- sites such as the Tryphoninae and Cryptinae rather than the Pimplini. There are certain structural features which appear to be connected with whether the larva is an ectoparasite or an endoparasite. The antenna in most ectoparasites is papilliform. In most endoparasites it is reduced and disc-like. ‘The mandible is toothed in most ecto- parasites where teeth are necessary for holding on to the host and for piercing the host skin. In most endoparasites the mandible is without teeth. The labral sclerite is present in most ectoparasites and absent in most endoparasites. The epistoma and the labral sclerite are rarely present together, except in the Tryphoninae, where the epistoma is slender. It is difficult to suggest a reason for this. The anterior retractor muscles of the labrum insert on the median part of the labral sclerite (Short, 1952, p. 39, fig. 7B). It is not likely that the labral sclerite could brace the cranium in any way as a substitute for the epistoma. The epistoma is well developed in larvae with powerful mandibles. The closing apparatus of the spiracle adjoins the atrium in most endoparasites, whereas in ectoparasites it may adjoin the atrium or be situated some distance from the atrium. There is no obvious explana- tion for this. It is generally assumed that the spiracles are open in endoparasites in the final instar larva, which is carnivorous, feeding on ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 505 /——____ 2 O-imm Figure 64.—Cryptinae:Hemitelini, head sclerites: 4tractodes sp. (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.) the tissues of the host and liberating air from the tracheae. If the spiracle is open there is possibly some biological advantage in having the closing apparatus situated close to the atrium. If one function of the closing apparatus is to prevent the entry of body fluids of the host into the tracheal system, then it is best situated to perform this func- tion when it adjoins the atrium. If, however, such a precaution were necessary, one would more readily expect to find hydrofuge structures at the opening of the tracheal system, as in many aquatic insects. The setae of the skin of endoparasites are reduced. It should be noted that the Cryptinae, which contain both ecto- parasites and endoparasites of prepupae and pupae, show larval characters which are relatively uniform within the group. Just as some similar adults have different larvae, so do some different adults, such as the Metopiinae and Anomalinae, have similar larvae. These similarities may be correlated with larval habits. The Meto- piinae, Anomalinae,®” Ichneumoninae, and Pimplini all have large, 30 Except Anomalon. 506 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 toothless mandibles with a corresponding development of the epistoma and pleurostoma. In the Metopiinae, Anomalinae, and Ichneumoninae the hypostoma is also well developed. In the Pimplini the hypostoma is reduced, but the hypostomal spur is well developed. The hypostomal spur is absent in the Metopiinae, Anomalinae, and Ichneumoninae. The labial and stipital sclerites are, except in the Pimplini, relatively poorly developed. The reduction of these sclerites might be corre- lated with the relatively slight cocoons spun by these endoparasites (see section on Anomalinae). In the species examined of the Metopiinae, Anomalinae,”! Ichneu- moninae, and Pimplini, development takes place in, or is completed in, the pupa of a lepidopterous host. The Campoplegini, which are endo- parasites of larvae, have a different type of head structure with the epistoma absent and the labial and stipital sclerite relatively well developed. With regard to the degree of development of these sclerites it is significant that many Campoplegini emerge from the host larva to spin a well developed cocoon, although some species of Hyposoter and Benjaminia pupate within the host larva. It cannot be claimed that all Ichneumonidae which emerge from the pupa of the host, or even from the pupa of a lepidopterous host, will have a larval head of similar form. The Cryptinae have a head struc- ture which is very different from that of the Metopiinae, Anomalinae, Ichneumoninae, and Pimplini. Also, larval habits are not constant. Mr. J. F. Perkins (in litt.) has directed my attention to some reared specimens of 7richomma occisor Habermehl with a quite well developed cocoon and to an Ophion in which the cocoon is spun within the host pupa, which remains adhering to the outside of the cocoon. Thorpe (1930) has observed that the ectoparasite E’phialtes ruficollis (Graven- horst) spins a light and irregular cocoon, yet when reared in a gelatin capsule usually does not spin a cocoon. But it does appear that in most Metopiinae, Anomalinae, Ichneumoninae, and Pimplini there is some connection between the form of the larval head and the habits of the larva. It is thus possible that convergence in larval characters asso- ciated with a similarity in larval habits might explain the similarity of the Metopiinae and Anomalinae. From the standpoint of larval characters alone, the following inter- relationships are suggested among the subfamilies of the Ichneu- monidae. The Metopiinae and Anomalinae are related. The Ophi- oninae, Mesoleiinae, and Lissonotinae are also related subfamilies. Similarly, but to a lesser extent, there appears to be some degree of relationship between the Tryphoninae, Cryptinae, and the tribes of the Pimplinae other than the Pimplini and Acaenitini. The Ichneu- moninae show some likeness to the Orthopelmatinae. The Adelogna- thinae, Collyriinae, Plectiscinae, Diplazoninae, and Mesochorinae are 31 Except Anomalon, which pupates within the larvae of Elateridae. ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 507 all isolated subfamilies. The Pimplini and Acaenitini are isolated tribes showing some degree of relationship to each other and to the remaining tribes of the Pimplinae. There was thought to be no point in attempting to construct a family tree. Relationship between the [Ichneumonidae and Braconidae The tribe Xoridini of the Pimplinae has a type of mandible which resembles that of the subfamily Braconinae of the Braconidae. The Braconinae possess the most generalized larval structure of the Braconidae. Since the larval structure of the Xoridini is also gener- alized, it is possible that this tribe connects the Ichneumonidae to the Braconidae. There is a similarity in larval habit as well as in larval structure since many primitive ichneumonids and braconids are parasites of woodboring insects (see Brues, 1921). References Ayyar, P. N. KrisHna 1943. Biology of a new ichneumonid parasite of the Amaranthus stem weevil of South India. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (B), vol. 17, pp. 27-36. Baker, W. A.; Braptey, W. G.; AnD Cuark, C. A. 1949. Biological control of the European corn borer in the United States. U.S. Dep. Agr. Techn. Bull. 983, 185 pp. BAUMANN C. von 1933. Zur Kenntnis der Metamorphose von Ephialtes manifestator L., Coleocentrus excitator Poda und Echthrus reluctator L. (Hym. Ichn.). Zool. Anz., vol. 102, pp. 143-155. BEIRNE, B. P. 1941. A consideration of the cephalic structures and spiracles of the final instar larvae of the Ichneumonidae (Hym.). Trans. Soc. British Ent., vol. 7, pp. 123-190. 1942. Notes on some lepidopterous pests on fruit trees, and their parasites, in Ireland during 1941. Econ. Proc. Roy. Dublin Soc., vol. 3, pp. 107-118. 1942a. The biology and control of the Larch-Shoot Moth, Argyresthia laevigatella H.-S. Econ. Proc. Roy. Dublin Soce., vol. 3, pp. 130- 149. 1943. The biology and control of the small ermine moths (Hyponomeutec spp.) in Ireland. Econ. Proc. Roy. Dublin Soc., vol. 3, pp. 191-220. Buunk, H. 1952. Zur Kenntnis der Hyperparasiten von Pieris brassicae L. Pt. 5: Hemiteles simillimus sulcatus. Die Metamorphose. Zeitschr. Ang. Ent., vol. 33, pp. 421-459. Brapiey, W. G., ano Burasss, E. D. 1934. The biology of Cremastus flavo-orbitalis (Cameron), an ichneumonid parasite of the European corn borer. U.S. Dep. Agr. Techn. Bull. 441, 16 pp. 008 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Brown, N. R. 1947. Studies on the parasites of the spruce budworm, Archips fumiferana (Clem.). 2. Life history of Glypta fumiferanae (Viereck) (Hy- menoptera, Ichneumonidae). Canadian Ent., vol. 78, pp. 188-147. Brugs, C. T. 1921. Correlation of taxonomic affinities with food habits in Hymenoptera, with special reference to parasitism. Amer. Nat., vol. 55, pp. 134-164. CAMERON, E. 1938. Astudy of the natural control of the pea moth, Cydia nigricana Steph. Bull. Ent. Res., vol. 29, pp. 277-313. 1950. The biology and economie importance of Alomya debellator (F.), a remarkable parasite of the swift moth, Hepialis lupulinus (L.). Bull. Ent. Res., vol. 41, pp. 429-438. 1951. On the identity of an ichneumonid parasite of Hepialis lupulinus (L.). Bull. Ent. Res., vol. 41, p. 687. CurystaL, R. N., AND SKINNER, E. R. 1931. Studies on the biology of Xylonomus brachylabris Kr. and X. irrigator ¥., parasites of the larch longhorn beetle, Tetrepium gabriele Wiese. Forestry, vol. 5, pp. 21-33. Cuancy, D. W. 1946. The insect parasites of the Chrysopidae (Neuroptera). Univ. Cali- fornia Publ. Ent., vol. 7, pp. 403-496. CusHMAN, R. A. 1916. Thersilochus conotracheli, a parasite of the plum curculio. Journ. Agr. Res., vol. 6, pp. 847-855. 1947. A generic revision of the ichneumon-flies of the tribe Ophionini. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., vol. 96, pp. 417-482. Cusuman, R. A., AND Rouwer, §. A. 1921. Holarctic tribes of the subfamily Ichneumoninae (Pimplinae). Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., vol. 59, pp. 379-396. Daviautt, L. 1930. Notes biologiques sur Nemeritis canescens Gray. et sur la morphologie de ses divers stades. Rev. Path. Veg., vol. 17, pp. 82-93. Downpen, P. B. 1941. Parasites of the birch leaf-mining sawfly (Phyllotoma nemorata). U.S. Dep. Agr., Techn. Bull. 757, 56 pp. Given, B. B. 1944. The anatomy of the final larval instar of Diadromus (Thyraella) collaris Grav. (Ichneumonidae), with notes on structural changes during the prepupal and pupal stages. Trans. Roy. Soc. New Zealand, vol. 74, pp. 297-301. GorpaNicu, A. 1931. Gli insetti predatore e parassiti della Pyrausta nubilal’s Hubn. Boll. Lab. Ent. Bologna, vol. 4, pp. 77-215. Griot, M., anp Icart, A. 1948. Observaciones sobre Balcarcia bergi Brethes parasito del “bicho de cesto.” Rev. Inv. Agr. Buenos Aires, vol. 2, pp. 197-204. Imms, A. D. : 1918. Observations on Pimpla pomorum Ratz., a parasite of the apple blossom weevil. Ann. Appl. Biol., vol. 4, pp. 211-217. ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 509 Irawa, K. 1950. Biology of ichneumon parasites of bag-worms in Japan, I. Trans. Kansai Ent. Soc., vol. 15, pp. 35-47. Kost, G. 8., anp Hincxs, W. D. 1945. A check list of British insects. 483 pp. MAnNeEVAL, H. 1936. Nouvelles notes sur divers hyménoptéres et leurs larves. Rev. Frangaise Ent., vol. 3, pp. 18-32. Meyer, H. 1922. On the morphology of the larvae of some parasites of the family Ichneumonidae. Rep. Bur. Appl. Ent. Leningrad, vol. 2, pp. 25-39. Morris, K. R. S. 1937. The prepupal stage in Ichneumonidae, illustrated by the life-history of Exenterus abruptorius, Thb. Bull. Ent. Res., vol. 28, pp. 525-534. Morris, K. R. 8.; Cameron, E.; anp Jepson, W. F. 1937. The insect parasites of the spruce sawfly (Diprion polytomum Htg.) in Europe. Bull. Ent. Res., vol. 28, pp. 341-393. Movutta, L. A., anp Courrots, C. M. 1952. Parasites of the moth-borers of sugar-cane in Mauritius. Bull. Ent. Res., vol. 43, pp. 325-359. NIELSEN, E. 1923. Contributions to the life-history of the pimpline parasites (Poly- sphincta, Zaglyptus, Tromatobia). Ent. Medd., vol. 14, pp. 137- 205. 1935. : ' ‘ mat ( 7 f i ot ; 1 4 o 7 é ! f ° , , g' ia) iv 7 ny Ss oy 4 Sab th 4, yey Ae Ff ; et on g9 ‘ z rc a oe y ty i ee MS eRe Biage es) TT, Fee a a BA Ts, badd O51 a or eee es a". : ma ee pho BoP yd eer on ee ii \ Ai Co Ae Wi eT, Sein 38 Att Pee » : a) , ? ‘ 7 ar yy ma) igal, bay's ae sl iy ie » 4 ; llhvow mm) ~~ P 1 Ls eee wee i jale pen acer : ’ eS, 7 oi ~*~ q ye? ie oD a 7 . & “iy : . W : : ; si nie Ae , se 7 ~. 54 PROCEEDINGS OF THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM issued 4 Weer SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION U.S. NATIONAL MUSEUM Vol. 110 Washington : 1960 No. 3420 MAMMALS OF NORTHERN COLOMBIA, PRELIMINARY REPORT NO. 8: ARBOREAL RICE RATS, A SYSTEMATIC REVISION OF THE SUBGENUS OECOMYS, GENUS ORYZOMYS ! By Puitie HERsHKOVITZ? Arboreal rice rats are small to medium-sized cricetines of the genus Oryzomys (family Muridae). They are found only in tropical and subtropical zone forests of Central and South America. Of the two recognized species, the larger, Oryzomys (Oecomys) concolor, occurs in northern Colombia. The author collected 27 specimens from six localities during his 1941-43 tenure of the Walter Rathbone Bacon Traveling Scholarship and 38 specimens, including six of the smaller species, Oryzomys (Oecomys) bicolor, in other parts of Colombia while conducting the Chicago Natural History Museum-Colombian Zoological Expedi- tion (1949-52). This material and pertinent field observations are the basis of the present report. ; j Previous reports in this series have been published in the Proceedings of the U.8. National Museum as ‘ollows: 1. Squirrels, vol. 97, August 25, 1947. Spiny rats, vol. 97, January 6, 1948. . Water rats, vol. 98, June 30, 1948. . Monkeys, vol. 98, May 10, 1949. . Bats, vol. 99, May 1949. : Rabbits, vol. 100, Suiy 26, 1950. . Tapirs, vol. 103, May 18, 1954. Garator of Mammals, Chicago Natural History Museum. Nop et 513 504676—59—1 514 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 MatTERIAL A total of 390 specimens was studied. This number includes vir- tually all arboreal rice rats preserved in American museums, and the types only in the British Museum (Natural History). The following abbreviations for museums are used in the lists of specimens examined. AMNH= American Museum of Natural History BM = British Museum (Natural History) CM = Carnegie Museum CNHM=Chicago Natural History Museum MACN = Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales MCZ =Museum of Comparative Zoology UMMZ= University of Michigan Museum of Zoology USNM =United States National Museum The writer expresses thanks to the authorities of the above insti- tutions for permitting him to study the material in their charge. THE ORYZOMYINE RODENTS The general characters of subgenus Oecomys are common to Oryzomys and a number of other genera which together compose the oryzomyine group of the subfamily Cricetinae (family Muridae). In addition to the aforementioned, the group includes the currently recognized genera or subgenera Melanomys Thomas, Oligoryzomys Bangs, Microryzomys Thomas, Nesoryzomys Heller, Neacomys Thomas, Scolomys Anthony, Nectomys Peters, Sigmodontomys J. A. Allen, and Megalomys Trouessart. The group has been defined elsewhere (Hershkovitz, 1944, Univ. Michigan Mus. Zool. Misc. Publ. No. 58, pp. 12-17). Its more salient characters may be summarized as follows. Size and form Mus-like to Rattus-like; eyes and ears normal; hind feet of the generalized scansorial-terrestrial type, or moderately specialized for running, swimming or climbing; three middle digits of hind foot partly, but not always conspicuously, webbed; claws short, more or less recurved, never specialized for digging; tail always more than one-half as long as head and body combined, generally thinly haired, the scales always visible; mammae eight (two pairs pectoral, two pairs inguinal). Distance between first molars always more than length of M’; median longitudinal palatal ridge not present; bony palate produced posteriorly beyond plane of last molars; postero- lateral palatal fossa present and marked by a distinct pit or reticula- tion of pits; parapterygoid fossa shallow, its anterior corner never undercut. Incisors ungrooved, generally opisthodont, never proodont; molars generally brachyodont, never distinctly hypsodont; crowns crested or terraced, never plane (cf., Hershkovitz, 1955, Fieldiana, Zool., vol. 37, p. 649); mesoloph (id) present in all molars and fused ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 515 with mesostyle (id) as a functional unit; procingulum of upper molars and postcingulum of lower molars present and usually well developed. Remarks: With few exceptions, all real species of oryzomyine rodents are well defined. Unfortunately, the multiplication of names has made the identification of any one of them an extremely arduous, sometimes nearly impossible, task. A total of 54 names, mostly of specific grade, have been given to representatives of Oecomys alone. These are shown to be applicable to only two species with a com- bined total of nine subspecies. Subgenus Oryzomys (Oecomys) Thomas Gcomys, Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 18, p. 444, 1906 (subgenus of Oryzomys Baird); ser. 8, vol. 3, pp. 378-379, 1909 (genus). Oecomys, Gyldenstolpe, Kung]. Svenska Vet.-Akad. Handl., ser. 3, vol. 11, p. 38, 1932 (characters; list of species)—Tate, Amer. Mus. Nov., No. 581, p. 10, 1932 (taxonomic history).—Ellerman, The families and genera of living rodents, vol. 2, pp. 340, 342, 357, 408, 1941 (subgenus of Oryzomys). Oryzomys, Goldman, North American Fauna, No. 43, pp. 15, 82, 1918 (part, Oryzomys tectus group). Typr species: Rhipidomys benevolens Thomas [=Oryzomys (Oecomys) bicolor phaeotis Thomas], by original designation. INCLUDED SPECIES: Oryzomys concolor Wagner, O. bicolor Tomes. Disrrinution (figs. 1, 2): Forested parts of the tropical and subtropical zones of Central and South America, from Costa Rica through Panama into Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, Venezuela, Trinidad, the Guianas and Brazil; altitudinal range from near sea level to approximately 2,000 meters above. The ranges of the two species are coextensive in Panama, the Rio Orinoco basin of Colombia and Venezuela, and the Amazonian region. So far as known, only the larger species, Oryzomys concolor, occurs in Costa Rica, northern Colombia, northwestern Venezuela, and Trini- dad. The smaller OQ. bicolor occurs alone in western Ecuador. Taxonomic History The first name proposed for an arboreal rice rat is Mus cinnamo- meus Pictet and Pictet, 1844. It is based on an eastern Brazilian representative of the larger species of subgenus Oecomys. Unfortu- nately, it is invalid because the name Mus cinnamomeus had already been used by Lichtenstein in 1830 for a species of spiny rats of the modern genus Proechimys. The next name for an Oecomys is Hesper- omys concolor Wagner, 1845. It was given to the large form discovered by Johann Natterer in the forests of the upper Rio Negro, northwestern Brazil. While the name concolor was virtually ignored by recent authors, the animal it represents has since been redescribed under 27 different names. VOL. 110 OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM PROCEEDINGS 516 SuIqda][O9 [ENpPLAIpul JO uoNeI0] JOT syoanyd Si/Of UID!IDIO See ee ta Seeetnee a SN{OaGOH JOJOIIG ~*(79¢ *d) 1290119ze3 pur 1x02 vas suoness "eOLIIWY YINOG pur [eIUID Ul 407091g skuozk4G JO satoadsqns ay} Jo UOTINGIIIsIGq— | AANOIY 517 ARBOREAL RICE RATS—-HERSHKOVITZ SISUBIYOG YAOGOA SUOIGQNS SNSOIDAAS AOJOIUOI 518 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 The first binomial for the smaller species of subgenus Oecomys is Hesperomys bicolor 'Tomes, given in 1860 to a specimen from eastern Ecuador. As in the case of O. concolor, the true nature of bicolor was not immediately appreciated by subsequent workers. The next member of the species, collected in western Ecuador, was de- scribed by Thomas in 1900 as Rhipidomys dryas. This was followed by Rhipidomys pheotis, R. benevolens, R. rosilla and R. paricola, all described by Thomas on the basis of comparisons with his R. dryas. In 1906, Thomas discovered the essential oryzomyine characters of the small arboreal rice rats assigned by him to Rhipidomys. The close relationship between them and Hesperomys bicolor Tomes was also noted. Accordingly, Thomas combined them in Oecomys, a new subgenus of Oryzomys. Thomas also included in subgenus Oecomys his previously described marmosurus, mamorae, and roberti, each based on a local form of the large species of arboreal rice rats. All other named forms of arboreal rice rats, including Hesperomys concolor Wagner, were ignored or tacitly regarded as species of true Oryzomys. The name Oecomys was elevated to full generic rank by Thomas in 1909. This classification was followed by authors until Ellerman (The families and genera of rodents, vol. 2, p. 342, 1941) questioned the validity of Oecomys even as asubgenus. It appears that Ellerman was misled by the current uncritical listing of some named forms of Oryzomys concolor as species of typical Oryzomys, and other named forms of O. concolor as species of Cecomys. Thus, his specimens of “Oryzomys”’ tectus and ‘‘Oecomys”’ osgoodi, exhibited as proof of the absence of important differences between the two “genera” concerned, are actually conspecific and identical with Oryzomys concolor. The issue is further confused by Ellerman’s observation that ‘“Oecomys”’ catherinae Thomas shares critical cranial characters with Oryzomys subflavus Wagner. The type of Oryzomys catherinae, however, is not an Oecomys (see p. 543) but merely another specimen of Oryzomys subflavus Wagner. The proper basis for evaluating the taxonomic status of Oecomys is a comparison of its type species, O. bicolor Tomes, with O. palustris Harlan, the type species of Oryzomys. Neither of these species was taken into account by Ellerman. ReEecoGNIZED ForMS OF THE SUBGENUS Oryzomys bicolor trabeatus G. M. Allen and Barbour (p. 533). Oryzomys bicolor occidentalis, new name for Rhipidomys dryas Thomas (=Oryzomys dryas Thomas), preoccupied (p. 533). Oryzomys bicolor bicolor Tomes (p. 534). Oryzomys bicolor phaeotis Thomas (p. 540). Oryzomys concolor concolor Wagner (p. 545). Oryzomys concolor speciosus J. A. Allen and Chapman (p. 553). ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 519 Oryzomys concolor superans Thomas (p. 556). Oryzomys concolor roberti Thomas (p. 559). Oryzomys concolor bahiensis, new subspecies (replaces Mus cinnamomeus Pictet and Pictet, preoccupied) (p. 561). Status or Certain Species INcorREcTLY ASSIGNED TO Oecomys Ocecomys catherinae Thomas, 1909=Oryzomys subflavus Wagner, 1842. (See infra p. 543.) Oecomys rez Thomas, 1910=Oryzomys subflavus Wagner, 1842. (See infra p. 543.) Ocecomys emiliae J. A. Allen, 1916=Rhipidomys emiliae J. A. Allen. Ocecomys phelpsi Tate, 1939=Akodon aerosus Thomas, 1913. The name phelpsi is based on a skin of what may be either an Oecomys or a Lhipidomys (cf. Tate, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 76, p- 194, 1939) and a mismatched skull of Akodon (Chalcomys) aerosus. ‘The name phelpsi was restricted to the skull by Tate (Journ. Mammal., vol. 26, p. 316, 1945). Oecomys phelpsi Tate, therefore, is a synonym of Akodon aerosus. Goodwin (Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 102, p. 300, 1953) lists the skin as type. Tate’s decision, however, has priority and is irrevocable. Mus pyrrhorhinos Wied Neuwied, 1821=Wiedomys pyrrhorhinos Wied Neuwied. This small arboreal mouse from eastern Brazil was provisionally referred to Oecomys by Osgood (Journ. Mam- mal., vol. 14, p. 370, 1933) and is so classified by Goodwin (Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 102, p. 300, 1953). Ellerman (Fami- lies and genera of living rodents, vol. 2, p. 349, 1941) lists it as the sole member of a species group of Oryzomys. It has since been shown (Hershkovitz, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, vol. 72, p. 5, 1959) that the mouse is type of a distinct genus most nearly related to phyllotine rodents. Mus maculipes Pictet and Pictet, 1844=Rhipidomys maculipes Pictet and Pictet. Incorrectly listed as an Oecomys by Tate, Amer. Mus. Nov., No. 581, pp. 10, 21 [footnote 1], 1932. Hesperomys simpler Winge, 1888=? Winge (EK Museo Lundii, vol. 1, No. 3, p. 11, pl. 2, fig. 1, 1888) based the name on the anterior portion of a skull found in owl pellets in Recent-Pleistocene de- posits in the caves of Lagéa Santa, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Moojen (Os roedores do Brasil, p. 55, 1952) treats this species as an Oecomys. However, it is obvious from the original description and figured skull, and from Winge’s own definition of Hesperomys, that simpler is neither an Oecomys nor an oryzomyine. The broad forward-projecting zygomatic plate of simplex, its narrow, unridged, and rather concave-sided interorbital region, long palate, and simplified molars, i.e. without mesoloph, point to 520 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 phyllotine or sigmodont affinities. A more precise determination of the systematic position of Hesperomys simplex cannot be made on the basis of available data. CHARACTERS EXTERNAL CHARACTERS: Body heavy, limbs short and adapted for arboreal life; size from approximately that of a house mouse (Mus musculus) to that of a medium-sized house rat (Rattus rattus); pelage long and thick; dorsal surface from buffy to tawny or rufous, with a fine to coarse mixture of dark brown; a poorly defined dark middorsal band sometimes present; underparts from sharply defined white to dark gray, buff, or ochraceous little or not at all defined from sides; an ochraceous lateral line present or absent; ears comparatively small, length (from notch) approximately one-half to four-fifths length of hind foot (dry, with claw); tail never sharply bicolor, sparsely haired except at thickly furred base, tip with or without a conspicuous tuft; length of tail from 40 to 60 percent of total length; hind foot comparatively short and broad, sole at heel bare but half hidden by overlapping hairs of side of tarsus; six plantar tubercles present and well developed; first hind toe with claw extending to base of middle phalanx of second toe, fifth hind toe well developed for grasping, its claw nearly or quite on a level with base of terminal phalanx of fourth toe; claws short and recurved, the fifth exposed, the others partially concealed by the digital tufts. CRANIAL CHARACTERS (pls. 1-3): Skull moderately heavy; sides of supraorbital region ridged or beaded and markedly divergent pos- teriorward; midtransverse width of paired frontals more than greatest width of rostrum; nasals comparatively short; upper anterior corner of vertical zygomatic plate rounded and slightly or not at all visible when skull is viewed from above; zygomatic plate comparatively slender, its anteroposterior width at midpoint not more than alveolar length of M’!~; interparietal well developed, its median length vary- ing from approximately three-tenths to slightly more than one-half its transverse width; sphenopalatine vacuities small, slit-like, or ob- solete; incisive foramina moderately long and well opened, length more than one-half but less than nine-tenths that of diastema, the posterior borders terminating from slightly before to slightly behind anterior plane of first molars; auditory bullae small, their antero- posterior length, exclusive of tube, less than that of molar row. DENTAL CHARACTERS (fig. 3; pl. 4a,b): Upper incisors recurved; upper molar rows parallel-sided; inner and outer halves of unworn to moderately worn upper molar crowns distinctly crested, of lower molars bilevel, i.e., with outer cusps lower than inner cusps; major fold well open, a low enterostyle present at its base in M!*, and fre- ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 521 quently in M®; first minor fold reduced or obsolete in unworn M?, obsolete or absent in M?’; anterior border of procingulum of unworn first upper molar sometimes notched; mesostyle always fused with mesoloph and connected with either paracone or metacone, or both; a well-developed paralophule usually present and often extending across first secondary fold to connect with mesoloph; primary folds often irregular in outline, the second primary usually isolated from the margin; first and second internal folds of M'!* discrete or confluent with corresponding primary folds, of M® discrete or confluent with primary or secondary folds; first secondary fold present in all upper molars, usually as an enamel island or as two, sometimes three, is- lands separated by the paralophule; second secondary fold present in M!~ as an enamel island, in M* as a discrete island, or may be coalesced with either second primary or second internal fold, or absent. Pro- cingulum of M, subovate in outline, never distinctly bilobate, the internal, labial and lingual folds isolated from the margin, discrete or coalesced with each other; apex of major fold of M,+ hardly or not at all extending beyond midline of tooth; first minor fold well de- veloped in all lower molars; ectostylid well developed in all molars; ectolophid always present, frequently well developed and fused with ectostylid; a well-defined fold between hypoconid and ectolophid often present and isolated from the margin; first and second internal folds coalesced with corresponding primary folds; first secondary fold of M..; obsolete or absent; second secondary fold of M,., well developed, usually isolated but clearly defining mesolophid, of M3; obsolete or absent; a small entolophulid sometimes present in one or more molars. CoMPARISONS Subgenus Oecomys is the oryzomyine most specialized for arboreal life. Its adaptive characters contrast sharply with those of true Oryzomys as represented by its typical species, the palustrine, riparian O. palustris Harlan. In palustris, pelage of upperparts is dark and glossy, middle digits of hind feet (fig. 4f) long, the outer ones short; interdigital webbing nearly as well developed as in the aquatic oryzomyine Nectomys; fifth postdigital plantar tubercle reduced or lost as in many aquatic Muridae; tail coarsely scutulated and often provided with keel hairs. The skull of O. palustris (pls. 1-4) differs from subgenus Qecomys chiefly by the prominence of the forward- projecting zygomatic plate when viewed from above and by the ex- tremely large sphenopalatine vacuities. The molars of palustris and subgenus Oceomys (pl. 4) are similar but the lower internal folds are usually discrete in those of palustris. Except for the presence of intermediate forms, typical Oryzomys and subgenus Oceomys might well be treated as generically. distinct. 022 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Some species of the arboreal genus Rhipidomys resemble subgenus Oecomys in superficial characters. Both groups have evolved as arboreal forms along parallel lines but Rhipidomys is more special- ized. Its tail (fig. 56) is more hairy and, in certain species, considerably longer; the fifth hind toe is longer and a brown metatarsal patch is generally present. The very closely related Nyctomys (fig. 5a) is another arboreal cricetine that resembles subgenus Oecomys in external characters. Rhipidomys and Nyctomys are members of the pero- myscine group of cricetines which differs from oryzomyines chiefly by its short palate (pl. 2d) without pitted posterolateral palatal depres- sions, some minor dental characters (pl. 4), and by the mammary formula, 1—2=6. Additional comparisons of subgenus Oecomys are given under the individual species headings. Some ARBOREAL ADAPTATIONS Hinp Foot (fig. 4): The pes of subgenus Oecomys is actually and relatively shorter and broader than that of closely related terrestrial species of comparable body size. Measurements of the length of the hind foot of a series of the small species Oryzomys (Oecomys) bicolor are shown in table 1. They may be compared with measurements in EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS IN FicurRE 3 Names of Cusps Upper Molars 1, Protocone 2, Hypocone 3, Paracone 4, Metacone 5, Mesoloph 6, Mesosty] 7-12, Procingulum 7, Anteroloph 8, Anterolabial style 9, Anteroconule 10, Anterolingua] style 11, Anterolabial conule 12, Anterolingual conule 13, Posteroloph (post- cingulum) 14, Enterostyle 15, Paralophule Lower Molars 1, Protoconid 2, Hypoconid 3, Metaconid 4, Entoconid 5, Mesolophid 6, Mesostylid 7-12, Procingulum 7, Anterolophid 8, Anterolingual stylid (not shown) 9, Anteroconulid 10, Anterolabial stylid 11, Anterolingual conulid 12, Anterolabial conulid 13, Posterolophid (post- cingulum) 14, Ectostylid 15, Ectolophid 16, Entolophulid Names of Folds mf, major fold nf 1, first minor fold pf 1, first primary fold pf 2, second primary fold sf 1, first secondary fold sf 2, second secondary fold if 1, first internal fold (shown coalesced with pf 1) if 2, second internal fold (shown coalesced with pf 2) aif, anterior internal fold asf, anterior secondary fold (upper first molar only) alf, anterior lingual fold (upper first molar only) abf, anterior labial fold (lower first molar only) apf, anterior primary fold (lower first molar only) ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 523 abf FIRST UPPER MOLAR BUCCAL VIEW Ficure 3.—Molars of Oecomys: a diagrammatic composite of the enamel pattern. The basic elements and some of the variations present in the upper and lower molars of Ory- zomys (Oecomys) bicolor and O. (O.) concolor are shown. Explanation of symbols on opposite page. 524 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 JN iN O bicolor’ ©O concolor O. laticeps O. meridensis O. palustris Ficure 4.—Right hind foot of: a, arboreal Oryzomys bicolor; b, arboreal O. concolor; c, semi-arboreal O. subflaous; d, terrestrial O. laticeps; ¢, terrestrial O. meridensis; f, palus- trine O. palustris. g, Plantar surface of murid hind foot showing position of pads (1-5= postdigital plantar pads; mtp=metatarsal pad). ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 525 table 2 of a series of the equally small but terrestrial species Oryzomys alfaroit. Measurements in tables 3 and 4 are, respectively, of a series of the large arboreal Oryzomys (Oecomys) concolor from eastern Colombia, and those of a series of the comparably sized terrestrial Oryzomys (Oryzomys) laticeps from the same region. Because of distortions of the hind{foot in dry specimens, no reliable measurement can be given for the width of the metatarsus relative to foot length. The hind foot of Gecomys appears short in comparison with terres- trial types. Nevertheless, the proportions between metatarsalia and digits have probably diverged little from those of the scansorial type of primitive cricetines. On the other hand, the greater breadth of the metatarsus of subgenus Oecomys (fig. 4a,b) does appear to be a specialization for arboreal life. The broader foot provides a more powerful and expansive grasp for climbing, perching, and hanging. It also permits an effective degree of opposability between the first and fifth metatarsals and a considerable amount of adduction and abduction in the corresponding toes. PLANTAR TUBERCLES: Six plantar tubercles, the primitive number, are present and well developed in subgenus Oecomys (fig. 4a,b). The first four postdigital pads are large and with little space between them. The smaller fifth postdigital pad is also well developed, and is sepa- rated from the fourth by a space less than its smallest diameter. The metatarsal pad is long and narrow, as usual in cricetines. The function of the postdigital plantar tubercles has not been observed in subgenus Oecomys. Homer (Contr. Lab. Vert. Gen. Univ. Michigan, No. 61, p. 13, 1954) states that in scansorial forms of Peromyscus the pads are used for grasping. ‘The method was not described but undoubtedly slender branches and twigs may be clutched between apposing tubercles. Criaws: The claws are thick, comparatively short, recurved, their tips sharp and raised well above the ends of the toes. These claws cannot serve for digging and their position does not interfere with the action of the toes as grasping organs. In contrast, claws of closely related terrestrial cricetines such as Oryzomys laticeps are slender, little curved, and shield the fleshy tips of the toes when used in scratching or digging. Tait: Modification of this organ as a specialized tool for arboreal life is not pronounced in subgenus Qecomys. It is not remarkably long and in many individuals is actually shorter than head and body combined. The average length, however, is greater than that of head and body combined. The tail of subgenus Oecomys appears to be slightly thicker than those of comparable sylvan cricetines of pre- dominately terrestrial habits. This character indicates greater power for balancing, prehension and support in climbing. The 526 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 C d Ficure 5.—Comparative length of hair of terminal portion of tail of: a, arboreal peromy- scine, Nyctomys; b, arboreal peromyscine, Rhipidomys; c, arboreal oryzomyine, Oryzomys bicolor; d, terrestrial oryzomyine, Oryzomys laticeps. pilosity of the tail (figs. 5, 6) varies considerably but is never as great as in such related arboreal cricetines as Rhipidomys and Nyctomys. The thin pencil and elongated hairs of the terminal one-fourth or one-third of the tail are probably sensory and used by the mouse for detecting movements in the rear. Discussion: Hind foot length of arboreal mice of the subgenus Oecomys averages less than 21.5 percent of combined head and body length. The hind foot of predominantly terrestrial oryzomyines aver- ages more than 21 percent. The arboreal or terrestrial pes could, there- fore, have evolved from an ancestral type with average length from 21 to 21.5 percent of combined head and body length. Specialization of the hind foot of the evolving arboreal cricetine is expressed first by a lateral broadening of the metatarsus. As the animal becomes increas- ingly dependent on its arboreal habitat, the metatarsus becomes more flexible, the first and fifth digits more powerful and opposable, and the plantar tubercles modified for grasping. In contrast, the hind foot of the highly specialized cursorial or saltatorial terrestrial crice- tine becomes narrower and longer relative to head and body length, the metatarsus rigid, and the first and fifth hind digits reduced. A tail length approximately equal to head and body combined appears to be the generalized condition in cricetines. In the evolu- tion of ambulatory, terrestrial species, notably volelike and fossorial forms, the tail becomes shorter. In arboreal, saltatorial and some ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 527 Ficure 6.—Hair-scale relationships on basal portion of tail in Oryzomys. Hairs of one scale only are shown; the same number and disposition of hairs occurs on every scale. (X 40.) aquatic cricetines, the tail has become longer, at least on an average. The degree of specialization of hind foot and tail of cricetines may be measured by the amount each organ has diverged from the critical proportions given above. Thus, in oryzomyines the longer the hind foot than 21.5 percent of combined head and body length, or shorter than 21 percent, the more specialized it is. In other cricetines, the critical proportions may be a little more or less. Likewise, the longer or shorter a tail than combined head and body length, the greater the specialization. This, in effect, implies that a specialized short- footed species could not have evolved from a specialized long-footed form, or vice versa; and that a specialized long-tailed species cannot claim a specialized short-tailed species as its ancestor, or vice versa. On the basis of the above criteria, Oryzomys (Oecomys) concolor is more highly specialized for arboreal life than O. (Oecomys) bicolor. Its hind foot is comparatively shorter, its tail proportionately longer. The more developed temporal ridges also indicate greater special- ization of the masseter muscle. HapBits AND Hapsrirats The two known species of subgenus Oecomys nest in tree hollows, tangled masses of epiphytes or vines, palm fronds, abandoned bird nests and in thatched roofs of houses. They normally feed above ground, but famine or drought may drive them to the ground in search 528 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 of food and water. At least the larger species, Oryzomys concolor, never lives far from water. I have often shined individuals at night running along the maze of tree trunks, vines, logs and even fences that connect their arboreal nests with the water’s edge. The smaller species is the one most commonly found in houses where arboreal habitats are simulated by the palm-thatched roofs and natural timber frameworks. A lone mouse or one or two families of either species may be permanent residents in the thatched roof or attic of a house. On the other hand, many individuals merely visit buildings for feeding on insects or man’s food stores. Marauding mice are obliged to cross the cleared ground between the forest-edge and the building. Oryzomys concolor frequently nests near the ground. It is commonly taken in traps placed on logs, along fences and on the banks of streams sheltered by shrubs and overhanging vines. OQ. concolor has managed to survive in a number of localities (e.g. Villanueva, Colombia) where the primitive forest cover has been reduced to small isolated stands, scattered trees, shrubs and thinly wooded stream banks. It also thrives in plantations of coffee, bananas and other fruits. Where living conditions are optimum, Oryzomys concolor tends to form colonies and can become excessively numerous. The collector Sala- mon Briceiio notes (MS.) that the species does considerable damage in coffee plantations in the district of Mérida, Venezuela. The smaller species, Oryzomys bicolor, is strictly arboreal and prefers to nest high above ground. Although one of the most common native house mice in tropical South America, it is not found in areas where forests have lost their dominance. It lives in pairs or in single family groups and is nowhere known to be abundant. Males of Oryzomys concolor exude a musky odor. The females of either species of Oecomys produce two to four young in a litter. The condition of the mammae in dry skins suggests that young are born the year round. The name Oecomys (oikos=house-+-mus) was given in allusion to the mice’s predilection for houses. In eastern Ecuador where ar- boreal rice rats are common, the local Quechua name for QO. concelor is “polanda ucucha” (banana rat) and for OQ. bicolor, ‘jahua uchucha.” The meaning of ‘“‘jahua”’ is obscure. Oryzomys bicolor Tomes Disrrisution (fig. 1): Tropical zones of Panama, Venezuela (ex- clusive of the Maracaibo basin), Ecuador, the Guianas, the Amazonian and upper Rio Paraguay basins of Brazil, and the Amazonian regions of Bolivia, Peru, and Colombia; altitudinal range, from near sea level to about 2,000 meters above. The apparent disbributional hiatus in ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 529 northwestern Venezuela and in northern and western Colombia may not be real. EXTERNAL CHARACTERS: Dorsal surface ochraceous to tawny finely mixed with dark brown; underparts sharply defined white or buffy to ochraceous, the basal portions of the individual hairs white through- out, or pale gray on belly and lateral borders; tail from 40-60 percent of total length. TaBLE 1.—Oryzomys (Oecomys) bicolor bicolor Tomes: External measurements (in millimeters) of a series of adults from the Rio Caquetd region, eastern Colombia. Specimens were collected and measured in the flesh by the author. Note proportional length of hind foot and compare with table 2. Hind foot Hind foot/ Weight CNHM No. Tail (dry, c. u.) ore (in grams) Percent 20.9 21.0 20.9 21.1 22.8 18.9 CRANIAL CHARACTERS (pls. 1-11): Sides of supraorbital region finely beaded, sometimes narrowly ledgelike; temporal ridges never strongly developed anteriorly, weakly defined or obsolete posteriorly; anterior zygomatic plate comparatively narrow, its anteroposterior width at midpoint always less than alveolar length of M!-’, and fre- quently less than length of M?~*; upper anterior corner of zygomatic plate not produced forward and barely or not at all visible when skull is viewed from above; braincase well inflated, usually convex antero- posteriorly at frontoparietal suture, the interparietal steeply arched; position of posterior borders of incisive foramina from slightly in front of to slightly behind anterior plane of first molars; posterior halves of palatines without notable excrescences. DENTAL CHARACTERS. Those of the subgenus. Comparisons: Ordinarily the difference in size between Oryzomys bicolor and O. concolor is sufficient for distinguishing the smaller from the larger species. However, a few extremely large individuals of O. bicolor may equal or even exceed in size small adults of some popu- lations of O. concolor. Where the similarity extends to color of underparts, length of hind foot, size of molars and width of anterior zygomatic plate, it may be difficult to distinguish an isolated specimen of the first species from that of another of the second species. 504676—59 2 530 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 TaBLE 2.—Oryzomys (Oryzomys) alfaroi gracilis Thomas: External measurements (in millimeters) of a series of adults from Valdivia, Antioquia, central Colombia. Specimens were collected and measured in the flesh by the author. Note proportional length of hind foot and compare with table 1. Head and Hind foot Hind foot/ Weight CNHM No. Sex body Tail (dry, c. u.) Head and (in grams) body Percent 70507 a 110 119 26 23.7 40 70508 fot 101 108 25 24.7 40 70511 fof 114 110 26 22.8 _ 70513 ou 104 108 26 25.0 30 70515 a 107 104 25 23.3 40 70516 fol 122 122 27 pede _ 70517 foul 104 112 25 24.0 _ 70518 ofl 107 127 27 25. 2 40 70509 °) 101 101 24 23.7 — 70510 °) 106 101 25 23.6 _ 70512 2 106 101 25 23.5 30 70514 io) 116 116 26 22.4 _— Mean 108 112 25 23.7 37 Members ofthe Oryzomys longicaudatus group, or subgenus Olig- oryzomys, are the only other rice rats that resemble Oryzomys bicolor. They are smaller, primarily terrestrial”mice, with pelage compara- tively coarse, underparts sometimes pure white, as in 0. bicolor but more commonly with the color of the basal portions of the hairs dark gray and usually showing through at the surface; tail more slender, equal to or longer than combined head and body length, coarsely scutulated, nearly naked and without a definable pencil; hind foot narrow and comparatively longer, generally more than 23 percent of combined head and body length; sole at heel not hidden by over- lapping lateral tarsal hairs in the tropical zone forms; first hind toe with claw barely extending beyond base of second toe, fifth hind toe slender, its claw extending to base of middle phalanx of fourth toe, sometimes slightly distad; skull (pl. 7b) more elongate, braincase narrower, bullae more inflated; anterior zygomatic plate forward- projecting so that one-half its width is visible from above; supraorbital region narrow, the sides concave, parallel or slightly divergent pos- teriorward and never ridged or beaded; median longitudinal sulcus of nasals continuing as a well marked depression over anteromedian portion of frontals. CoLoR AND PELAGE: Geographic variation in color in Oryzomys bicolor is insignificant from a taxonomic point of view. This is remarkable in view of the extent and ecological diversity of the area occupied by the animal. The usual correlation between coat color and color of soil or ground cover apparent in most terrestrial cricetines ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 531 TaBLeE 3.—Oryzomys (Oecomys) concolor superans Thomas: External measure- ments (in millimeters) of a series of adults from the Rio Caquetd region, eastern Colombia. Specimens were collected and measured in the flesh by the author. Note tail length and proportional length of hind foot and compare with table 4. Hind foot Hind foot/ Weight CNHM No. bod (dry, c. u.) Head and (in grams) Percent anit 18.2 ou ro rol rol oe fo a rot fof 2 2 9 9 2 2 g g 2 9 is not evident in arboreal Oryzomys bicolor. The direct relationship between amount of rainfall and intensity of coat color, clearly ex- pressed in many species of terrestrial and arboreal mammals, is but slightly indicated on the underparts of some individuals of OQ. bicolor. Temperature throughout the area occupied by O. bicolor is fairly uniform and has little or no effect on the length, thickness, texture and, indirectly, the color of the pelage. The underparts vary from pure white to uniformly ochraceous. White underparts may be marked by buff or ochraceous spots, patches and streaks. In underparts that appear wholly white at the surface, the basal portions of the hairs are generally white except, sometimes, along the sides where they may be gray. Where the underparts are tinged, the basal portions of the hairs are, as a rule, dark gray. In any one population, each adult may be classified as either bright or dark according to the color of its upperparts and sides. In the bright color group, the terminal portions of the cover hairs are ochra- ceous orange with or without a fine dark brown tipping. The terminal portions of the guard hairs are dark brown. The colors in the dark group are similar but the cover hairs are more uniformly tipped with dark brown and there is a greater concentration of guard hairs. 532 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 The difference between the color groups are slight and in any large series completely intergrading. Extreme examples of the bright color group are nearly erythristic. On the other hand, no specimen of the dark group even remotely suggests melanism. There are some examples in present material of adults molting from one color group to another. The color of nestling young is like that of adults. As the juvenal coat of cover hairs on upperparts and sides becomes worn, the dark eray basal portions of the hairs show through. Adult pelage begins to replace juvenal pelage on the lower parts of the sides of the body and on the shoulders. Adult pelage appears next on head, nape, and shoulders, respectively. Evidently, the short, wholly slate colored pelage characteristic of most newborn terrestrial species of Oryzomys is either absent or ephemeral in O. bicolor. THE SUBSPECIES Four subspecies of Oryzomys bicolor are recognized, two of them provisionally. The first, bicolor Tomes, occupies most of the range of the species east of the Andes. The second, phaeotis Thomas of southeastern Peru and northern Bolivia, averages larger in size than the others. OQ. 6. trabeatus G. M. Allen and Barbour is the Central American representative. It appears to be completely isolated TasLeE 4.—Oryzomys (Oryzomys) laticeps Lund: External measurements (in millimeters) of a series of adults from the Rio Caquetd region, eastern Colombia. Specimens were collected and measured in the flesh by the author. Note tail length and proportional length of hind feet and compare with table 3. Head and Hind foot Hind foot/ Weight bod (dry, c.u) many (in grams) rou rot a fol fol ou rou rot rou rol ro rou 9 2 2 © ie) 2 ] ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 533 geographically from its relatives but is not known enough to be characterized. 0. 6. occidentalis (new name) of western Ecuador is distinguished by a few trivial cranial characters. Oryzomys (Oecomys) bicolor trabeatus G. M. Allen and Barbour Oecomys trabeatus G. M. Allen and Barbour, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., vol. 65, p. 262, 1923.—G. M. Allen, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., vol. 71, p. 266, 1931 (type history). Oecomys endersi Goldman, Journ. Washington Acad. Sci., vol. 23, p. 525, 1933 (type locality, Barro Colorado Island, Canal Zone, Panama).—Enders, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., vol. 78, p. 454, 1935 (Barro Colorado, Panama; habits). Typr: Adult male, skin and skull (MCZ 19837); collected Apr. 10> 1922, by Thomas Barbour and W. S. Brooks. TYPE Loca.ity: Rio Jesusito, Darién region, eastern Panama. DistrisuTion: Known only from the Canal Zone to the eastern boundary of Panama. The range may extend into Costa Rica on the west and into the Colombian Chocé on the south; altitudinal range from sea level to about 500 meters above. Cuaracters: Those of the species. See ‘‘Remarks,”’ below. MeEasurEMENTs: Those of the type of trabeatus (from the original description) are followed by those of the type of endersi: head and body, 110, 114; tail, 120, 124; hind foot, 22 (in flesh), 24 (dry); ear, 15, 15; greatest length of skull, 26.0, 28.1; zygomatic breadth, 15, 15.1; rostrum, —, 5.4; incisive foramina, —, 4.8; diastema, 7.0, 7.4; molar row, 4.0, 4.3 (alveolar); width of zygomatic plate, —, 2.5. Remarks: Judged by the original description, the type of trabeatus is a young individual of the bright color group. It was compared with three darkly colored individuals of Oryzomys bicolor from eastern Ecuador and said to differ by its ‘somewhat larger’’ size, longer tail and longer, thicker pelage. None of these distinctions is valid. Retention here of trabeatus for Central American members of the common species is based solely on the availability of the name and the absence of any records of the occurrence of the species in the deciduous forests of northern Colombia. It is also possible that additional material from Panama may reveal subspecific differences that cannot be accurately evaluated from one specimen. The type of enderst Goldman, also from Panama, is an old individual of the dark color group. Its size and color are within the range of variation of the typical form of the species. SPECIMENS EXAMINED: One (UMMZ, type of endersi, from Panama). Oryzomys (Oecomys) bicolor occidentalis, new name Rhipidomys dryas Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 5, p. 271, 1900 (preoccupied by Oryzomys dryas Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 2, p. 267, 1898, a member of the subgenus Microryzomys) 534 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 [Oryzomys (Gicomys)] dryas, Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser., 7, vol. 18, p. 455, 1906 (“probably = bicolor’’). Type: Adult female, skin and skull (BM 99.12.5.4); collected May 11, 1899, by R. Miketta. Type Locauity: Paramba, Rfo Mira, Imbabura, northwestern Ecuador; altitude, 1,100 meters above sea level. Distrisution: Known from northwestern Ecuador only. No doubt the range extends northward into western Colombia. Its southward extension may be limited to the Rio Guayas drainage system in Manabi, Bolivar, and Guayas Provinces, Ecuador. Its altitudinal range is from near sea level to about 1,500 meters above on the western slope of the Cordillera Occidental. CHARACTERS: Size and external characters as in ¢trabeatus and typical bicolor: zygomata less expanded; midtransverse width of paired frontals hardly more than greatest width of rostrum and com- paratively less than in other races. MeEAsuREMENTs: Those of the type of dryas Thomas (from the original description) are followed by those of two adults from Pambilar, Esmeraldas, Ecuador: head and body, 100, 104, 106; tail, 120, 115 (dry), 130 (dry); hind foot, 22 (s.w.), 22 (dry, c.w.), 23 (dry, c.u.); ear, 14, 12 [?], 15; greatest length of skull, 27.0. 26.4, 27.4; zygomatic breadth, 15.0, 13.5, 13.4; rostrum, —, 5.1, 5.3; incisive foramina, 4.6, 4.6, 4.5; diastema, 7.0, 6.5, 6.4; molar row, 3.8, 4.0 (alveolar), 4.1 (alveolar) ; width of zygomatic plate, —, 2.2, 2.5. Remarks: The three near topotypes at hand are brightly colored. One is a juvenal in old pelage but with an irregular patch of bright new adult pelage on nape, back, and left side. SPECIMENS EXAMINED: Four, from the following localities in Ecuador: Paramba, Imbabura, 1 (BM, type of dryas); Pambilar, Esmeraldas, 3 (USNM). Oryzomys bicolor bicolor Tomes Hesperomys longicaudatus, Tomes (not Bennett), Proc. Zool. Soc. London (1858), p. 548, 1859 (Gualaquiza, Ecuador). Hesperomys bicolor Tomes, Proc. Zool. Soc. London (1860), p. 217, 1860. [Hesperomys] M[yoxomys] bicolor, Tomes, Proc. Zool. Soc. London (1861), p. 284, 1862. H{esperomys (Rhipidomys)] bicolor, Thomas, Proc. Zool. Soc. London (1884), p. 448, 1884 (doubtfully referred to Rhipidomys). Oryzomys (CEcomys) bicolor, Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 18, p. 445, 1906 (‘‘type. .. described from a discoloured specimen with a broken tail’). Oryzomys (Oecomys) bicolor, Sanborn, Journ. Mammal., vol. 30, p. 285, 1949 (Yarinacocha, Loreto, Peru). comys bicolor, J. A. Allen, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 35, p. 210, 1916 (Colombia: Andalucfa, Huila; Florencia, Caquet4).—Thomas, Ann. Mag. ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 535 Nat. Hist., ser. 9, vol. 19, p. 370, 1927 (Yurac Yacu, San Martfn, Peru, “mostly caught in house’’); ser. 10, vol. 2, p. 262, 1928 (San Jerénimo, Loreto, Peru). Oecomys bicolor, Osgood, Field Mus. Nat. Hist., zool. ser., vol. 10, p. 161, 1914 (Tambo Yacu, near Rioja, San Martin, Peru).—Gyldenstolpe, Kung]. Svenska Vet.-Akad. Handl., vol. 11, p. 39, 1932 (characters; ‘“‘type locality: South-western Ecuado:, Guayaquil.’”—Tate, Zoologica, vol. 32, p. 66, 1947 (Rancho Grande, Aragua, Venezuela, 1,100 meters). Rhtpidomys rosilla Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 14, p. 35, 1904 (type locality, La Unién, lower Rio Caura, Rfo Orinoco, Bolfvar, Venezuela). [Oryzomys (Ccomys)] rosilla, Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 18, p. 445, 1906 (classification). Rhipidomys paricola Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 14, p. 194, 1904 (type locality, Igarapé Agu, on the railway line between Belém de Pard and Braganca, Parad, Brazil; altitude, 50 meters). [Oryzomys (GEcomys)] paricola, Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 18, p. 445, 1906 (classification). Gcomys nitedulus Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 8, vol. 6, p. 505, 1910 (type locality, lower Essequibo River, 13 miles above mouth, Demerara, British Guiana).—Anthony, Zoologica, vol. 3, No. 13, p. 275, 1921 (Kartabo, British Guiana). CGcomys millert J. A. Allen, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 35, p. 523, 1916 (type locality, Barfo de Malgacgo, Rio Conguiaru, upper Gy-Paran4, Rio Madeira, Mato Grosso, Brazil). Gcomys florenciae J. A. Allen, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 35, p. 524, 1916 (type locality, Florencia, Rfo Orteguaza, upper Rio Caquetd, Caquetd, Colombia). [?]@comys rutilus Anthony, Amer. Mus. Nov., No. 19, p. 4, 1921 (type locality, Kartabo, at junction of Cuyuni and Mazaruni Rivers, lower Essequibo, Demerara, British Guiana) Anthony, Zoologica, vol. 3, No. 138, p. 275, 1921. Rhypidomys [sic] benevolens, Ihering (not Thomas), Rev. Mus. Paulista, Sao Paulo, vol. 6, p. 420, 1904 (Rio Jurud, Amazonas, Brazil; skull, 28 mm., molar row, 4.3). Type: Young adult female, skin and skull (BM 7.1.1.96) ; collected by Mr. Fraser. TYPE LocaLity: Gualaquiza, Rio Gualaquiza, Santiago-Zamora Province, southeastern Ecuador; altitude, 885 meters above sea level. Distrisution: From the Amazonian region of Brazil north into the Guianas, west into the foothills of the Cordillera Oriental in Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, and the Rios Ucayali and Huallaga basins of Peru, south into the upper Rio Paraguay drainage basin in Mato Grosso, Brazil; altitudinal range from sea level to possibly 1,000 meters above. CuaractEers: Those of the species. MEASUREMENTs: See table 5. VARIATION: Six specimens at hand from Zamora are near topotypes. Three are juvenals in old pelage with the new adult pelage appearing along the sides of the body. The three adults are uniformly colored PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 TaBLe 5.—Oryzomys bicolor bicolor Tomes: Measurements (in millimeters) Locality COLOMBIA Guaicaramo Mambita Florencia 1! Florencia Mecaya Tres Troncos Ino Gaje EcuADOR Rfo Suno Llunehi Canelos Copataza Zamora Gualaquiza ? PERU Curaray Rio Mazaén Rio Santiago Rio Ucayali 3 Satipo VENEZUELA Rancho Grande La Union 4 BRITISH GUIANA Kartabo Kartabo 6 Essequibo?7 Holmia BRAZIL Jauaraté Igarap6 Bravo Limontuba Reereio Igarapé-acu 8 Baréo Melgaco ® Bardo Melgaco 100 98, 100, 100 111, 105, 115 109, 110 96(85-113)8 110, 108, 107 103, 108, 103 108, 112 108 pa 105, 105 100 100, 100, 100 95, 120, — 119, 121 107(98-114)7 105, 117, 113 100, 121, 100 111, 111 110 108, =, — 120, 115 Hind foot 22(21.0- 22.5)5 22 22 22, 22, 22 22, 22, 23 24 14, 16, 13 14, 14 15(14-16)8 ’ , 153515 by italic Skull, greatest length 28.2(25.7-29.1)5 26.5, 27.4, 28.8 26.5, 26.8, 28.1 26.9, 27.6, 27.9 26.6, 27.0, 27.5 27.6, 28.5 27.5 26.5(26.1-27.2)8 27.3 27.6 26.6, 27.5, 27.6 28.2, 28.8 26.7 27.4(26.7-28.1)6 24.2 29.0 25.2 27.1 25.5 24.9 27.2 25.0 24.0 23.7 1 Type of florenciae J. A. Allen, from original description. skins without skulls. 3 Type of bicolor Tomes, from original description. 3 Specimens from Pucallpa, Sarayacu, and Lagarto Alto, respectively. 4 Type of rosilla Thomas, from original] description, external measurements from the dry skin. The type and paratypes are of adults. figure.) Zygomatic breadth 14,9(14.5-15.1)4 14.9 14.4, 15.4, 15.3 14,1, 14.9 13.8 1440 15.9 14.1(13.1-14.6)6 —, 14.8, 15.0 13.3, 15.5, 14.2 14.3, 14.9 14.8 13.9(13.2-14.5)7 ’ ’ 14.7. 14.9 14,2 15.5 14.7(13.6-15.5)5 13.5 13.0 5 Without claw. ARBOREAL RICE RATS—-HERSHKOVITZ Rostrum width 5.1(4.7-5.4)6 5,3 4.9, 5.2, 5.1 4.7, 5.5 4.8 4.8, 5.0, 4.7 5.0(4.4-5.4)8 4.9, 5.1, 4.9 4.7, 5.5, 5.0 5.2, 4.8 5.0(4.8-5.4)7 5.0 b.2 4.8, 5.1, 5.3 5.2, 5.7 5.0(4.6-5.3)6 4.3 Incisive foramina 4.8(4.5-5.0)6 4.9 5.0, 4.5, 5.1 4.7, 5.3 4.8 4.7, 4.8, 4.7 4.8(4.3-5.2)8 eS aigi tok 4.3, 4.8, 4.9 5.0, 4.9 4,5(4.2-4.9)8 4.6 4.7 4.8, 5.1, 4.9 4.8, 4.7 4.9(4.6-5.4)6 3.7 5.2 4.6 4.9 4.3 4.1 4.5 4.2 5.0 4.6 Diastema 7.1(6.2-7.6)6 det 6.9, 7.4, 7.4 6.8, 7.4 7.0 6.5, 7.0, 7.2 6.8(5.5-7.5)8 One 6.5, 6.6, 6.9 7.5, 7.4 6.5(5.8-7.0)8 6.8 6.9 6.9, 7.3, 7.4 7.2, 7.3 7.0(6.6-7.5)6 6.5 6 Type of rutilus Anthony, from original description. 7 Type of nitedulus Thomas, from original description. 8 Type of paricola Thomas, from original description. § Type of milleri J. A. Allen, from original description Alveolar length of molar row 4.2(4.0-4.4)6 4.3 3.8, 4.6, 4.2 4.3, 4.2 3.9, 4.3, 4.2 4.1(4.0-4.3)8 4.0, 4.0, 4.0 4.4, 4.1, 3.8 3.9, 4.1 4.1(4.0-4.3)8 4.1 3.8 3.9, 4.1, 3.9 4.1, 4.1 3.9(3.8-4.2)6 3.4 3.7 3.9 (Number of specimens, when more ihan three, indicated Zygomatic plate width 2.5(2.3-2.7)6 2.4 2.5, 2.6, 2.3 2.3, 2.4 2.4 2.1, 2.2, 2.5 2.3(1.8-2.5)8 2.2, 2.5, 2.4 IODINE 2.3, 2.4 2.2(1.9-2.4)9 2.5 2.6 2.8, 2.2, 2.2 2.5, 2.4 2.4 537 538 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 except for an ochraceous streak on each side of the white underparts . In one. In five individuals from Canelos taken March 8-12, 1924, the underparts are faintly tinged with buff; in three from the same locality, taken in April 1910, and in two from the Rio Copataza and another from Montalvo, the underparts are pure white. The three localities mentioned are within a few miles of each other in the upper Rfo Pastaza region. Specimens from Jollin, Jatun Yacu, Llunchi, Avila, Concepcién, San José and Rio Suno, all in the upper Rio Napo region, show the same range of variation in color as the preceding. In one specimen from Llunchi, however, the belly is uniformly ochraceous and hardly defined from the sides. The series of 11 specimens from the Rio Curaray, Loreto, Peru, includes individuals in dark and bright pelage. One is nearly uniformly ochraceous orange on upperparts and sides. Underparts are white. One specimen has a pair of small ochraceous gular patches. One of four specimens from Lagarto Alto, Rio Ucayali, Peru, in old pelage, is nearly uniformly ochraceous tawny on head and back. This color is defined in the form of a molt line from the darker outer sides of shoulders and thighs. The other three specimens of the series are dark in unworn pelage. Underparts, upper lips and lower half of cheeks in one of two mice from Satipo, Junin, are yellowish. Under- parts of the other specimen are sharply defined white, the lips and cheeks ochraceous. The remaining Peruvian material consisting of one or two individuals from scattered localities reveal no peculiarities. The type series of Oecomys florenciae J. A. Allen, from eastern Colombia, is practically indistinguishable from typical bicolor as represented by any series from eastern Ecuador. Other Colombian specimens at hand exhibit no individual or local variables of note. Judged by the original description, the only distinguishing character of the Orinocoan “Rhipidomys”’ rosilla Thomas is the “buffy ochra- ceous”’ belly of the type as compared with the pure white belly of the type of dryas (=occidentalis) of western Ecuador. A colored belly, however, is a common enough character in bicolor of eastern Ecuador. In the absence of other distinctions, rosilla must be regarded as identical with typical bicolor. Ocecomys nitedulus Thomas of British Guiana is said to be “quite like the Orinoco Qe. rosilla above, but the undersurface is without the marked ochraceous wash characteristic of that animal.’ This characterization implies that nitedulus is like typical bicolor. Indeed, our material from British Guiana is altogether indistinguishable from eastern Ecuadorian bicolor. I have not examined the type of Oecomys ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 539 rutilus Anthony. Judged by the original description, it is a subadult of the same Kartabo series identified by Anthony as nitedulus. The description of paricola Thomas, from the state of Pard, Brazil, like that of rosilla, was based on a comparison with western rather than with eastern Ecuadorian representatives of bicolor. It is said to be ‘“‘duller” in color and smaller. Of two specimens at hand from the Rio Tapaj6z, Pard, one, an adult from Limontuba, is as small cranially as the type; the other, from Igarapé Bravo, is a subadult with a much larger skull. The color of either, whether dull or bright, is like that of bicolor from eastern Ecuador or anywhere else. Oecomys milleri J. A. Allen, from Baréo de Malgacgo, Mato Grosso, Brazil, was aptly diagnosed in the original description as “similar in general coloration and size to @. bicolor (Tomes).”’ A careful exami- nation of the type, two paratopotypes, a specimen from Urupé and another from Urucum de Corumbé confirms this characterization. The Corumba specimen is bright ochraceous on upperparts, pure white beneath. The topotypes are darker, with underparts yellowish in one, pure white in the other. The Urupd individual is darkest, tawny above, more buffy beneath. SPECIMENS EXAMINED: One hundred and seventeen, from the following localities: Cotomsia: Guaicaramo, Meta, 6 (AMNH); Mambita, eastern Cundinamarca, 1 (AMNH); Andalucia, Huila, 1 (AMNH); Florencia, Rfo Orteguaza, Caquetd4, 5 (including type of florenciae, AMNH); Tres Troncos, Rio Caquetd4, Caquetd, 3 (CNHM); Rio Mecaya, mouth of Rio Caqueté, Putumayo, 3 (CNHM); Ino Gaje, Rio Apoporis, Vaupés, 4 (CNHM). Kcuapor: Below San José, Rio Payamino, Napo-Pastaza, 2 (AMNH); Rio Suno, Rio Napo, Napo-Pastaza, 3 (AMNH); Avila, Rio Suno, Napo-Pastaza, 1 (USNM); Rio Jollfin, Napo-Pastaza, 2 (MCZ); Rio Jatun Yacu, Napo-Pastaza, 1 (MCZ); Llunchi, Rio Napo, Napo-Pastaza, 8 (UMMZ); Canelos, Rio Bobo- naza, Napo-Pastaza, 8 (AMNH, 5; MCZ, 3); Montalvo, Rfo Bobonaza, Napo- Pastaza, 1 (CNHM); Rfo Copataza, Napo-Pastaza, 3 (CNHM, 2; AMNH, 1); Zamora, Santiago-Zamora, 6 (AMNH). Peru: Rio Curaray, mouth at Rfo Napo, Loreto, 11 (AMNH); Monte Alegre, Loreto, 1 (AMNH); Sarayacu, Rfo Ucayali, Loreto, 2 (AMNH); Yarinacocha, Rfo Ucayali, Loreto, 2 (CNHM); Pucallpa, Rio Ucayali, Loreto, 1 (CNHM); Lagarto Alto, Rio Ucayali, Loreto, 4 (AMNH); Rfo Santiago, mouth of Rfo Marafion, 1 (AMNH); Puerto Indiana, Rio Marafion, Loreto, 1 (AMNH); Rio Mazén, Loreto, 1 (AMNH); Tambo Yacu, Rioja, San Martin, 1 (CNHM); Chanchamayo, Junin, 1 (CNHM); Satipo, Junin, 3 (MCZ); Pozuzo, Huanuco, 1 (CNHM). British Gurana: Kartabo, Demerara, 12 (AMNH); Holmia, Potaro High- lands, 1 (CNHM); Barakara, Canje River, 1 (AMNH); Essequibo River, 1 (BM, type of nitedulus). VENEZUELA: La Unién, Bolivar, 1 (BM, type of rosilla); Rancho Grande, Ara- gua, 1 (AMNH); Caifio Seco, Cerro Duida, Amazonas, 1 (AMNH). Braziu: Jauaraté, Rio Uapés, Amazonas, 2 (AMNH); Igarapé Bravo, Rio Tapajéz, Pardé, 1 (AMNH); Limontuba, Rio Tapajéz, Pard, 1 (AMNH); between 540 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Belem and Braganza, Pard, 1 (BM, type of paricola); Recreio, Rio Majary, Amazonas, 1 (AMNH); Urucum de Corumb4, Mato Grosso, 1 (CNHM); Baraéo Malgacgo, Mato Grosso, 3 (including type of milleri, AMNH); Urupd, Mato Grosso, 1 (AMNH). Oryzomys bicolor phaeotis Thomas Rhipidomys phexotis Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 7, p. 181, 1901. [Oryzomys (Gicomys)] phxotis, Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 7, p. 445, 1906 (classification). Oryzomys (Oecomys) phaeotis, Sanborn, Publ. Mus. Hist. Nat. “Javier Prado,’ ser. A, zool., No. 6, p. 21, 1951 (Peru: Marcapata, Cuzco; Camante, Cuzco). Rhipidomys benevolens Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 7, p. 369, 1901 (type locality, Chimate, upper Rfo Beni, La Paz, Bolivia; altitude, 700 meters above sea, level). [Oryzomys (Gicomys)] benevolens, Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 18, p. 445, 1906 (classification). Oecomys benevolens, Gyldenstolpe, Kungl. Svenska Vet.-Akad. Handl., ser. 3 vol. 11, p. 40, pl. 4, fig. 1 (skull), pl. 17, fig. 11 (molars), 1982. Types: Adult male, skin and skull (BM 1.1.1.23); collected July 23, 1900, by Perry O. Simons. ison Locality: ‘Segrario”’ pacer upper Rio Inambari, an affluent of the Rio Madre de Dios, Puno, southeastern Peru. DistriputTion: Departments of Cuzco, Puno, and Madre de Dios in southeastern Peru, and Departments of La Paz, Cochabamba, and Beni in northwestern Bolivia; altitudinal range from approximately 200 to 2,000 meters above sea level. Cuaracters: Largest of the subspecies; molars proportionately larger. MEASUREMENTs: See table 6. Remarks: The available Peruvian specimens of phaeotis, including the type and a paratype, are from four localities within a compara- tively small area in the drainage basin of the upper Rio Inambari, an affluent of the Madre de Dios. Two from Camante, Marcapata, taken August 1950, are as large as the type of phaeotis collected July 1900. An individual from Quincemil, collected August 1953, and another from Villa Carmen, Cosfiipata, dated September 1954, agree with typical bicolor in size. No measurements of the paratype were given but Thomas declared it to be ‘about the same general size” as the type. The large Camante specimens, judged by cranial charac- ters, are not older than the others and the molars are slightly less worn. Rhipidomys benevolens Thomas, from the upper Rio Beni, Bolivia, was characterized as larger than dryas (occidentalis) and smaller than phaeotis. Representative specimens from the upper Rio Mamoré include one subadult and three juvenals. They agree with phaeotis in their over-all larger size and proportionately larger molars as com- pared with typical bicolor of northeastern Peru and eastern Ecuador. 541 ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ “WOT{dyJOSep [eUTZ]I0 WO ‘seMIOyY, $%az0aawaq Jo OdAL e “YASUI UMOIO ¢ “WOTJA]IOSEp [BU]3]IO WO ‘seTMIOY,L #170anyd Jo edA J, 1 os a 4 8°9 6F e°¢ OFT 0°8% ST ¥ SOT 96 giedeyo = OF a9 4 og = oS 0°62 9T ha 0 GIT Orr L9P CUNY) VIAITOg £3 i 7 $9 oP oF L Yr PL FI oS TIT POT WeTIBO £% oF 69 i 7 £9 o'oT 9°82 LT (46 201 Ter Trureound Fz ‘9% LY ‘8? GL‘LL SF ‘O's g°¢ ‘Fg GOT ‘o°cT 9°08 ‘F'°6Z LT ‘LT GZ “G2 OST “6ZT SIT ‘6IT 97, UBB) = toP 0°8 0g = £91 208 8T &% = oIT 1 O}1BI98g oaaid Up AOI Ivj[Ou 430 eed Jo qjsue] | emeyseIq | sumo} apa qIpveiq qso} void Ieq joo} pul TL Apoq Aqeoo'T aryemI0sA4Z | IvpooaTy OATSIOUT TUn1jsoy dyes AZ ‘1o4xg pus pee ed ee ee ee IS. eS ee ae ‘S7]NpD fo (SiajawyjNU UL) Sjuamainsnayy :sDWOY,T sTyoovyd Jo[ooIq sAwozsIQ—"9 ATAV I, 042 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 A skin without skull from Ticunhuaya, Bolivia, not far from the type locality of benevolens, appears to belong here. The largest specimens of O. bicolor phaeotis are practically in- distinguishable from small adults of O. concolor from other parts of tropical America. On the other hand, the size difference between O. bicolor phaeotis and O. concolor of the same general region leaves no doubt regarding the separate identity of the two species. SPECIMENS EXAMINED: Eleven, from the following localities: Peru: Sagrario, Rio Inambari, Puno, 1 (BM, type of phaeotis); Hacienda Villa Carmen, Cosfiipata, Cuzco, 1 (CNHM); Camante, Marcapata, Cuzco, 2(CNHM); Quincemil, Marcapata, Cuzco, 1 (CNHM). Bouivia: Chimate, La Paz, 1 (BM, type of benevolens); El Palmal, Chaparé, Cochabamba, 1 (MACN); Marbdn, Rio Mamoré, Beni, 3 (MACN); Ticunhuaya, La Paz, 1 (AMNB#). Oryzomys concolor Wagner Distrinpution (fig. 2): Tropical and subtropical forested zones of Costa Rica, Panama, Colombia, Venezuela, Trinidad, the Guianas, Brazil, and the Amazonian regions of Bolivia, Peru, and Ecuador; altitudinal range from near sea level to approximately 2,000 meters above. EXTERNAL CHARACTERS: Dorsal surface buffy to tawny or rufous, with a fine to coarse mixture of dark brown; a poorly defined dark middorsal band sometimes present; underparts sharply or hardly defined from sides, basal portions of individual hairs white or gray; tail from 49 to 60 percent of total length. CRANIAL CHARACTERS (pls. 1-6, 8-11): Sides of supraorbital region prominently ridged, often ledgelike; temporal ridges well developed in adults for entire length of parietals; anterior zygomatic plate moderately broad, its anteroposterior width at midpoint. usually less, rarely equal to or slightly more, than alveolar length of M'?; upper anterior corner of zygomatic plate slightly projecting; braincase moderately inflated, flat or slightly convex anterodorsally at fronto- parietal suture; posterior borders of incisive foramina usually termi- nating anteriad to, rarely slightly behind, anterior plane of first molars; posterior half of palatines often marked by a pair of small transverse cornuate processes, one on each bone (one or both processes are frequently lost in the cleaning operation but the median burr or rugosity remains). DENTAL CHARACTERS (pls. 46, 126): Essentially as in O. bicolor but with first and second internal folds of M'!~? more frequently confluent with corresponding primary folds. In extremely worn teeth, however, these folds may be secondarily discrete. Comparisons: Oryzomys concolor is essentially an outsize O. bicolor. In most localities where the two species are sympatric the difference in size is obvious. On the other hand, many small northern represen- ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 543 tatives of concolor are hardly larger than some large southern individ- uals of O. bicolor (pl. 5). In the Guianas, size alone is not a decisive character. Generally, the heavier more “adult” skull of concolor with its better developed supraorbital and temporal ridges, less inflated braincase, and more gray or buff underparts are characters that help separate the larger from the smaller species where the two occur together. Representatives of Oryzomys subflavus Wagner® of Brazil and the Guianas have sometimes been confused with QO. concolor. The two species are similar in color, size, and taillength. In subflavus, however, the pelage is comparatively lax and harsh; hind foot (fig. 4c) long, stout, with outer digits shorter, first hind toe with claw barely ex- tending beyond base of second toe, fifth hind toe with claw extending only to base of middle phalanx of fourth toe; sole of heel exposed; excision of dorsal border of antorbital foramen deep, one-half or more of width of anterior zygomatic plate exposed to view when skull is viewed from above; supraorbital region of skull (c of pls. 8-11) broad, its sides ridged or beaded and divergent as in concolor; zygomata less expanded anteriorly; incisive foramina generally narrower but with their posterior borders not extending behind anterior plane of first molars; sphenopalatine vacuities more open but less so than in QO. zanthaeolus (compared below); bullae more inflated; enamel pattern of molars (pl. 12¢) essentially as in Oecomys. Oryzomys xanthaeolus Thomas is a semiarboreal species with a superficial resemblance to O. concolor. It occupies the dry coastal area of western Peru and southwestern Ecuador where Oecomys is not known to occur. Its pelage is comparatively lax, upperparts and sides of body buffy or olivaceous, lateral line absent, underparts not pure white; tail long as in concolor but untufted and bicolor for most or all its length; hind foot broader than in strictly terrestrial species but narrower than in concolor, the outer toes shorter and less robust, interdigital webbing more developed; general shape of skull (d of pls. 8-11) and sides of supraorbital region as in concolor but anterior zygomatic plate projected forward so that at least one-half its width is visible from above; incisive foramina longer, their length at least three-fourths that of diastema, and terminating posteriorly well behind anterior plane of first molars; sphenopalatine vacuities large, as in O. palustris (pl. 2c), posterior border of palate without excrescences; bullae well inflated ; enterostyles and ectostylids (pl. 12d) rudimentary or absent. 3 “Oecomys’’ catherinae Thomas is a synonym of Oryzomys subflavus. ‘‘Oecomys’’ rer Thomas, 1910, of British Guiana, is also a member of the same species but probably subspecifically distinct. The name, however, clashes with ‘‘Calomys” [= Oryzomys] rer Winge, 1888. Because of the homonymy, the name of the form described by Thomas may be changed to Oryzomys subflavus regalis (new name). 544 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Oryzomys laticeps * is a terrestrial species ranging coextensively with Oecomys. Its resemblance to Oryzomys concolor is superficial and restricted to body size and, in some cases, to color and texture of pelage. In laticeps, however, the tail averages shorter, the hind foot (fig. 4d) longer, the ear larger. The outer toes of the hind foot of O. laticeps are shorter than in all others with which comparisons have been made. A dark juvenal color-pelage phase and a distinct sub- adult color-pelage phase are well marked and more consistently present in laticeps than in other oryzomyines. The skull (e of pls. 8-11) of O. laticeps is comparatively longer than in concolor, the supraorbital region narrower, the sides ridged or beaded but not as widely divergent; rostrum with a more decided downward flexion; anterior zygomatic plate projecting well forward; anteroposterior width of zygomatic plate often more than length of M!~?; incisive foramina extremely short, generally less than 60 percent of length of diastema, their posterior borders separated from anterior plane of first molars by a distance approximately equal to length of first molar; sphenopalatine vacuities absent or small as in concolor; bones of posteropalatal region more cancellate with the excrescences or cornu- ate processes noted in concolor generally present and, usually, more developed; internal folds of molars (pl. 12¢) usually absent; second secondary fold absent in M’; second secondary folds of lower molars greatly reduced, sometimes coalesced with major fold of opposite side. CoLor AND PELAGE: The range of variation in color and character of pelage in Oryzomys concolor is wider than in O. bicolor. Populations of dry localities are distinctly paler than those of humid areas. The pelage of high altitude forms is invariably longer and thicker than that of their relatives of lower levels. As in O. bicolor, there are bright and dark color phases. The tone of the bright phase in a darkly colored population generally equals that of the dark phase of a pale colored population. In concolor, individual molt from one color phase to the other is obvious in a large proportion of the specimens. Pelage of nestlings is short, fine, and colored like that of adults. This is superseded by a longer dark gray or dark brown coat distinctly darker than that of adults. THE SUBSPECIES Five geographic races are recognized. The nominate subspecies, Oryzomys concolor concolor Wagner, occupies the greatest part of the 4 Specific synonyms of Oryzomys laticeps include bolivaris J. A. Allen, boliviae Thomas, caracolus Thomas, casteneus Thomas, goeldi Thomas, legatus Thomas, macconnelli Thomas, magdalenae J. A. Allen, medius Robinson and Lyon, modestus J. A. Allen, mollipilosus J. A. Allen, oniscus Thomas, perenensis J. A. Allen, rivularis J. A. Allen, saltator Winge, sylraticus Thomas, talamancae J. A. Allen, velutinus J. A. Allen, and a few others. Afus capito Olfers (1818), based on the “rat & grosse tate” of Azara, is undoubtedly the same species and antedates Mus laticeps Lund (1841). Afus cephalotes Desmarest (1819) is another name for Azara’s “‘rat & grosse téte.” ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 545 range of the species. It is a medium-sized, brightly colored form with an irregular pattern of geographic variation that reflects seasonal and local climatic differences. Nevertheless, individual variation in any one locality may be of the same magnitude as variation within the subspecies as a whole. The remaining four subspecies occupy peripheral and ecologically distinct parts of the range of the species. Oryzomys concolor superans Thomas, of the Amazonian rain forests along the base of the Andes, is the darkest and largest race. O.c. speciosus J. A. Allen and Chapman of the northeastern bulge of South America resembles superans in color, especially of the underparts, but agrees with typical concolor in size. The palest subspecies, 0. concolor robertt Thomas, lives in the subhumid southern border of the range in Bolivia and south-central Brazil. O. concolor bahiensis (new subspecies) is a saturate form of the rain forests of eastern Brazil. The pattern of local and geographic variation in Oryzomys concolor contrasts sharply with the comparative stability of O. bicolor. The difference between the two species in their response to color of soil and cover, humidity and temperature may be attributed to slight but significant differences in their habitat preferences. Oryzomys concolor generally nests lower and descends to the ground with greater fre- quency. It is, accordingly, less independent of factors controlling living conditions at ground level. Oryzomys (Oecomys) concolor concolor Wagner Hesperomys concolor Wagner, Arch. Naturg., vol. 11, pt. 1, p. 147, 1845; Abh. Akad. Wiss., Munich, vol. 5, p. 311, 1848 (characters) —Pelzeln, K. K. Zool.- Bot. Gesellsch., Wien, Beiheft 33, p. 70, 1883 (characters; habits).—Gylden- stolpe, Kungl. Svenska Vet-Akad. Handl., ser. 3, vol. 11, p. 151, 1932 (in- certae sedis).—J. A. Allen and Chapman, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 5, p. 213, 1893 (comparison with Oryzomys speciosus ‘‘with which it may prove to be identical’’). [Oryzomys] concolor, Tate, Amer. Mus. Nov., No. 579, p. 3, 1932 (taxonomic history). Oryzomys flavicans Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 6, vol. 14, p. 351, 1894 (type locality, Mérida, Sierra de Mérida, Venezuela). O[ryzomys] flavicens [sic], Goodwin, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 102, p. 310, 1953 (lapsus for flavicans Thomas, in discussion of O. palmarius J. A. Allen). Oryzomys flavicans illectus Bangs, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, vol. 12, p. 164, 1898 (type locality, Pueblo Viejo, Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Magdalena, Colombia, altitude, 853 meters.—Bangs, Proc. New England Zool. Club, vol. 1, p. 94, 1900 (Colombia: La Concepcién; Pueblo Viejo; Palomino; San Antonio; Oryzomys trichurus J. A. Allen, part, a synonym). O[ryzomys] flavicans illectus, J. A. Allen, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 12, p. 206, 1899 (Minca, Santa Marta Region, Magdalena, Colombia). Oryzomys illectus, J. A. Allen, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 20, pp. 436, 439, 1904 (Don Amo, Magdalena, Colombia). 504676—59 —_3 546 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Oryzomys flavicans subluteus Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 2, p. 268, 1898 (type locality, ‘‘W. Cundinamarca,” i.e., western slope of Cordillera Oriental, Cundinamarca, Colombia). O[ryzomys] subulatus [sic], Goodwin, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 102, p. 302, 1953 (lapsus for subluteuws Thomas, in discussion of Oryzomys helvolus). Oryzomys trichurus J. A. Allen, Bull..Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 12, p. 206, 1899 (type locality, El Libano, near Bonda, Santa Marta, Magdalena, Colombia, altitude 500 feet); vol. 20, p. 487, 1904 (Bonda, Colombia).—Tate, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 76, p. 190, 1939 (‘“‘juv. and synonym of illectus’’).— Goodwin, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 102, p. 301, 1953 (type history). Rhipidomys marmosurus Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 4, p. 378, 1899 (type locality, Maipures, middle Rfo Orinoco, Vichada, eastern Colombia). [Oryzomys (Cicomys)] marmosurus, Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 18, p. 445, 1906. Oecomys marmosurus, Tate, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 76, p. 194, 1939 (listed). G@[comys] marmosurus, Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 8, vol. 6, p. 187, 1910 (comparisons). Oryzomys tectus Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 8, p. 251, 1901 (type locality, Bugaba (misspelled ‘‘Bogava”’), Chiriqui, Panama, 250 meters alti- tude). Oryzomys tectus tectus, Goldman, North American Fauna, No. 43, p. 84, 1918 (revision; Boruca, Costa Rica)—Goodwin, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 87, p. 394, 1946 (Costa Rica: Boruca, Puntarenas; San Gerénimo de Pirris, San José). Oryzomys klagest J. A. Allen, Bull. Amer..)Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 20, p. 827, 1904 (type locality, El Llagual [Yagual], near Maripa, lower Rfo Caura, Bolivar, Venezuela).—Tate, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 76, pp. 190, 191,1939 (listed as member of “trinitatis group”? of Oryzomys (p. 190)).—Goodwin, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 102, p. 301, 1953 (type history; ‘‘probably a subspecies of O. flavicens [sic] Thomas’’). Rhipidomys (?) klagest, Gyldenstolpe, Kungl. Svenska Vet.-Akad. Handl., ser. 3, vol. 11, p. 50, 1932 (type a Rhipidomys [!] according to Tate, ex litt). Ccomys tapajinus Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 8, vol. 3, p. 378, 1909 (type locality, Santa Rosa, Rio Jamanchin, Rio Tapajéz, Pard, Brazil) ; ser. 8, vol. 9, p. 87, 1912 (Marajé6, Pard, Brazil); ser. 9, vol. 6, p. 277, 1920 (Brazil: Villa Braga, Rio Tapajéz, Par4; Monte Alegre, Rio Solimées, Para; Manacapurt, Rio Solimées, Amazonas). Oryzomys frontalis Goldman, Smithsonian Mise. Coll., vol. 56, p. 6, 1912 (type locality, Corozal, Canal Zone, Panama). Oryzomys tectus frontalis, Goldman, North American Fauna, No. 43, p. 85, pl. 4, figs. 4, 4a (skull), pl. 5, fig. 10 (mandible), pl. 6, figs. 7, 7a (molars), 1918, (Panama: Cana; Corozal, Canal Zone). Smithsonian Mise. Coll., vol. 69, p. 101, 1920 (Panama: Cana; Corozal; Tacarcuna). Oryzomys helvolus J. A. Allen, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 32, p. 597, 1913 (type locality, Villavicencio, upper Rfo Meta, Meta, Colombia); vol. 35, p. 212, 916 (Colombia: Villavicencio; Buenavista—Goodwin, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 102, p. 302, 1953 (‘probably a subspecies of O. flavicens [sic]; may equal O. subulatus [sic] Thomas’’). Oryzomys vicencianus J. A. Allen, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 32, p. 598, 1913 (type locality, Villavicencio, Meta, Colombia); J. A. Allen, vol. 35, p. 212, 1916 (Villavicencio, Colombia) —Goodwin, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 102, p. 302, 1953 (type history and measurements). ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 547 [Oryzomys] vicencianus, Tate, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 76, p. 190, 1939 (‘juv. and synonym of helvolus’’). Ccomys mincae J. A. Allen, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 32, p. 603, 1913 (type locality, Minca, Santa Marta region, Magdalena, Coiombia).—Good- win, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 102, p. 301, 1953 (type history). Cicomys caicarae J. A. Allen, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 32, p. 603, 1913 (type locality, Caicara, Rio Orinoco, Bolivar, Venezuela). Oecomys caicarae, Goodwin, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 102, p. 300, 1953 (type history and measurements). Oecomys guianae caicarae, Tate, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 76, p. 193, 1939 (Venezuela: Mt. Duida; Casiquiare). Oryzomys trinitatis, Tate (not Allen and Chapman), Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 76, p. 190, 1939 (part; Venezuela: Agitita; Mt. Duida). Type: Presumably in the Vienna Natural History Museum; col- lected Aug. 4, 1831, by Johann Natterer; original number, 174. Type Locauiry: Rio Curicuriari, an affluent of the upper Rio Negro, entering from the right below Sao Gabriel, Amazonas, Brazil. DistrisuTion: Tropical and subtropical forested zones of Costa Rica, Panama, northwestern Colombia, and eastern Colombia in the Rio Orinoco drainage system, western and southern Venezuela in the Lake Maracaibo and the middle and upper Rio Orinoco basins, the Amazonian rain forest of Brazil and their extensions into extreme northern Bolivia, eastern Peru, and eastern Ecuador; altitudinal range, sea level to approximately 2,000 meters above. CHARACTERS: Generally brightly colored, upperparts ochraceous buff to tawny finely ticked with dark brown, chest and belly white to buff, throat and chin white. MEASUREMENTS: See table 7. VARIATION: Two specimens from the type region are at hand. One, from Jauaraté, Rio Uaupés, above the type locality, is larger than the type, its belly with a light buffy wash. The other, from Yauanari, Rio Negro, below the type locality, is smaller, with belly, chest, and sides ochraceous buff. Underparts of the type are sharply defined white. The same range of variation in color of underparts obtains in most populations of the species. The type of Oecomys tapajinus Thomas and two other specimens from Tauary, in the type region on the Rio Tapajéz, Brazil, do not differ from concolor of the Rio Negro-Rio Orinoco basin. The under- parts of one of the two Tauary specimens is creamy, most notably on chest, throat, and chin; in the other, the same parts are sharply defined white. A specimen from Lago Cuiteud, on the opposite side of the SolimGes, is practically identical. A young individual from the Boca do Igarapé Piaba, also on the north bank of the Solimées, shows the old pelage being replaced by a more saturate new pelage. The type of marmosurus Thomas, from the middle Rio Orinoco, Colombia, is not significantly different from any other individual of 548 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 TaBLE 7.—Oryzomys concolor concolor Wagner: Measurements (in millimeters) Locality Head and body Tail Hind foot Ear mere Costa RICA San Gerénimo 125 149 28 — 34.5 E1 General 146 142 27 — 32.6 PANAMA Boruca 118, 125 140, 123 27, 28 _ 31.0, 31.1 Bugaba ! 140, 122 142, 147 27, 29 18, — —, 33.2 Cana § 148 161 30 — 35.5 Cana 126 (114-137)6 148(127-162)6 28 (26-29)6 | — 31.4 (28.8-34.0)7 COLOMBIA Socorré 129, 130, 143 154, 140, 154 28, 28, 29 18, 17, 18 33.7, —, 33.9 Catival 132 146 28 17 31.4 Muzo 128 140 29 16 31.8 Pueblo Viejo ¢ 132 160 25 5 17 _- Pueblo Viejo 136(122-145)6 145(140-155)5 26(25-27)5 | 17(15-18)5 30.4(29.8-31.1) 4 Palomino 140 145 26 16 32.3 Don Diego 127(111-137)8 149 (136-165)8 26(25-28)8 | — 31.6(30.5-32.3)5 Bonda 120 155 _ _ 28.8 E] Lfbano 6 121 160 25 —_ 30.0 Minca? 126 160 25 _— — Pueblo Bello 122, 114 136, 147 24, 26 17, 20 30.5, 31.4 E! Orinoco 129, 120 145, 135 24, 25 18, 17 29.2, 30.2 Villanueva 120(116-127) 4 151 (133-165) 4 24(23-25)4 | 16.5(15-17)4 | 29.7, 30.2 Sierra Negra 125 (116-136) 4 141 (133-153) 4 25(24-27)4 | 18(18-19)4 30.1(29.4-31.2)8 Marimondas 128, 140 151, 150 25, 26 17, 19 30.4, 32.8 Buena Vista 125(115-131)5 135(123-167)5 27 (25-28)5 | — 31.8(31.2-32.6) 4 Guaicaramo _ = 28 _ 35.2 Villavicencio § 134 143 27 _ 34 Villavicencio 1° 120 130 27 — 29 VENEZUELA Cogollo 130 154 26 _— 31.8 Azulita 136, 146 148, 169 28, 29 — 32.5, 34.4 Mérida 1! 116 129 245 — _ Mérida _ — — — 30.7 (28.3-31.6) 14 Caicara 13 122 152 25 16 30.2 Caicara 119 144 26 _ 30.7 Yagual 4 127 121 25 _ 32.0 Casiquiare 107 136 26 = 31.3 E] Merey 129 156 26 —_ 30.8 Esmeralda 122, 121 140, 145 28, 26 _ 30.6, 30.9 Ihuapo 120 132 26 _ 31.2 Ocama 125 155 2 _ 33.0 BRAZIL Curicuriari 126 124 _— _— = Curicuriari 1° 124 137 — _ — Jauaraté 137 148 28 _ _- Yavanari 115 125 27 _ 31.8 Cuiteué 140 150 27 _ 33.1 Santa Rosa 17 126 158 25 § 17 = Tauary 142 158 27 _ 33.8 Manapiri 114 153 27 16 = SEEPS EY SRS RAST LUE SN Le eh ee SU ee ee! 1 Type of tectus Thomas, from original description, followed by a paratype (USN M). 2 Possibly crown length. 3 Type of frontalis Goldman, from original description. 4 Type of illectus Bangs, from original description. 6 Without claw. 6 Type of trichurus J. A. Allen, from original description. 1 Type of mincae J. A. Allen, from original description. 8 Type of helvolue J. A. Allen, from original description. § Probably=5.2 mm. of adults. Zygomatic breadth 17.0 17.0 15.8 17.0, 16.5 18 16.5(15.4-17.4)7 16.6, 16.2, 17.6 15.4 16.8 16.3, 17.1 17.3 15.3 15.0 15.7, 16.8 16.4, 16.0 15(14.8-15.3)3 16.1(15.2-17.1)4 15.9, 16.4 16.6(16.1-17.2)5 16.3 16.3, 17.4 16.5(15.6-16.9) 4 213 16.9 17.0 16.4 16.3 16.6, 17.1 ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ Rostrum width 5.9, 5.6, 6.2 5.6 5.5 5.5(5.3-5.7) 4 5.6 5.7(5.4-6.3)5 5.5 5.6, 5.6 5.5, 5.6 5.4(5.1-5.6)5 5.5(5.2-5.8) 4 5.2, 5.5 5.9(5.6-6.3)5 6.5 5.9 5.9, 6.5 5.7(5.3-6.2)16 5.8 Incisive foramina 6.3, 5.7, 5.8 5.5 5.4 5.4(4.7-5.8) 4 5.6 5.6(5.2-5.9)6 4.8 5.0 5.1, 6.0 4.9, 5.5 5.1(4.8-5.3)5 5.4(5.2-5.6) 4 5.3, 5.7 5.8(5.6-6.0)5 5.8 Diastema 7.7(7.2-7.9) 4 8.2 7.9(7.6-8.2)6 7.1 7.7, 8.0 ss atlads 7.3(7.0-7.5)5 7.4(7.0-7.7)4 7.5, 8.0 8.2(7.9-8.8)5 9.1 7.5(7.0-7.9)19 7.6 10 Type of vicencianus J. A. Allen, from original description. il Type of flavicans Thomas, from original description. 13 Type of caicarae J. A. Allen, from original description. 18 In the original description, ‘13.6 mm.” is obviously wrong. 14 Type of klagesi J. A. Allen, from original description. 18 Type of concolor Wagner, from original description. 16 Type, collector’s measurements according to Pelzeln, 1833 (K. K. Zool.-Bot. Gesellsch., Wien., Beih., vol. 33, p. 70). 17 Type of tapajinus Thomas, from original description. Alveolar length of molar row 5.0 5.1, 5.0, 5.2 5.1 4.9 5.0(4.7-5.2) 4 5.5 4.9(4.6-5.2)8 4.4, 4.6 4.7(4.6-4.9)5 4.9(4.7-5.0) 4 4.7, 4.9 5.1(4.9-5.5)6 5.5 4.7 5.3, 4.9 4.83 5.0(4.7-5.4) 21 5.0 4.5 549 (Number of specimens, when more than three, tndicated by italic figure.) Zygomatic plate width 3.9 3.9 3.1, 3.2 —, 3.8 3.3(2.9-3.9))7 3.8, 2.7, 3.5 3.3 3.3 3.2(3.1-3.4) 4 3.7 3.4(3.1-3.6)8 3.0 3.1, 3.4 2.8, 2.8 2.8(2.6-2.9)6 3.3(3.0-3.6) 4 3.5, 3.2 3.7(3.5-3.9)5 4.1 3.3 3.3, 3.4 3.1 3.1(2.8-3.5) 21 3.1 3.3 2.9 3.38, 3.0 3.3 3.3 550 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 the subspecies concolor. Its belly is tinged with buffy, the hairs of the throat, chest, and groins white. Oryzomys klagesi J. A. Allen, from El Llagual (or Yagual), Rio Caura, farther down the Rio Orinoco, is nearer true concolor than speciosus, with which it was originally com- pared. O¢ecomys caicarae J. A. Allen is the third name given to the middle Rio Orinoco population of concolor. The duskier coloration of the upperparts in the type series indicates a cline leading to the darker speciosus in northeastern Venezuela and Trinidad. Twelve specimens from the upper Rio Meta region, Colombia (Villavicencio, Buena Vista, Mambita, Guaicaramo, Medina), repre- senting Oryzomys helvolus J. A. Allen and vicencianus J. A. Allen agree with concolor of the upper Rio Negro-Rio Orinoco region in size, but are more saturate on underparts and as dark on upperparts and sides as O. concolor superans. An extremely large female from Guaicaramo, like the type of frontalis, is equal in size to average adult superans. Morphologically and geographically, however, the mice of the Colom- bian base of the Andes in Orinoco drainage are nearest true concolor. Thirty-six topotypes of flavicans Thomas from Mérida, Venezuela, vary remarkably little inter se. Their upperparts are uniformly pale, their bellies whitish with a light to moderate, never a heavy, buffy wash. Three mice from La Azulita in the Maracaibo basin at the foot of the Sierra de Mérida are indistinguishable from the Mérida series. A specimen from Rio Cogollo on the Sierra de Perijé side of Lake Maracaibo is brighter above, more buffy beneath, and quite like individuals from the Colombian side of the same mountain range. The relationship of the intensity of body color to rainfall is shown by specimens from diverse localities in the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta. The darkest specimens are from the humid Don Diego region at the base of the mountains. Topotypes of zlectus Bangs from the equally humid but cooler northern slope of the Sierra average paler. A series from the humid locality of Pueblo Bello on the southern side of the range is colored like topotypes of illectus. In the warmer, less humid El Salado, farther down the eastern slope, the mice average paler. Thirteen specimens from the comparatively dry Rio Cesar valley (Villanueva; El Orinoco) between the Sierra Nevada and Sierra de Perij4 are smaller and extremely pale, their underparts more nearly pure white. They were taken from the early part of the dry season in January to the beginning of the rainy season in April. The January specimens are darkest, their pelage in good condition. In the March specimens, the pelage is faded and molting. April speci- mens show the darker new pelage on the middorsal region. The contrast is quite marked between the pale, comparatively short-haired valley mice of the dry season and the saturate prime pelage of speci- ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 551 mens taken during the rainy season on the comparatively cool slopes of the Sierra Nevada and the Sierra de Perija. Oryzomys trichurus J. A. Allen is founded on a juvenal and Oecomys mincae J. A. Allen on an adult, both from localities near Bonda in the semiarid northwestern corner of the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta. They are like the small pale mice of the ecologically similar valley at the western base of the Sierra. One specimen at hand from Bonda is virtually a dwarf. The range of variation in color, size, and degree of development of the supraorbital ridges shown by the mice of the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta region is greater than in those of any other single region. The tendency for each stream valley branch in each altitudinal zone to produce a distinctive population is one of the most striking bio- logical phenomena of the Sierra. Oryzomys flavicans subluteus Thomas from ‘‘W. Cundinamarca,” Colombia, was described as similar to Venezuelan flavicans “but dis- tinguished by its darker belly.” Three specimens at hand from Paime, Rio Minero, western Cundinamarca, with underparts lightly washed buffy are absolutely indistinguishable from topotypes of flavicans. ‘Two specimens from Muzo, western Boyacdé, and but a few miles downstream (north) from Paime, with underparts entirely buff except for the white throat and chin are exactly lke the type of subluteus. Oryzomys tectus Thomas was described as more brightly colored than flavicans and with “remarkably expanded supraorbital ridges.” The difference in color between western Panamanian tecius and Vene- zuelan flavicans lies well within the limits of variations common to any large population from either region. Supraorbital ridges are present in all members of the species and are more prominent in older than in younger individuals. It is true, nevertheless, that the ridges are more uniformly developed and ledgelike in most Central Ameri- can and western Colombian mice than in many other series of the subspecies. Western Colombian (Socorré, Puri, Catival) mice are indistinguish- able from their Panamanian relatives. In one specimen from Puri, Antioquia, the upperparts and sides are grizzled with an interspersion of wholly white cover hairs. A female from Socorré, upper Rio Sint, Cérdoba, shows the molt from dark to bright pelage. The name frontalis Goldman is based on eastern Panamanian mice that are less tawny above and less buffy beneath than the average of western Panamanian tectus. The difference, although locally con- stant, is slight. Remarks: The original description of Hesperomys concolor includes the following Latin diagnosis: “H[esperomys] fulvus, subtus abrupte 552 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 albus, pedibus fuscentibus; cauda nuda longitudine corporis; pilis gastraci unicoloribus.”’ Measurements, presumably taken from the dry skin are: ‘‘Kérper [head and body], 4’’ 10’ [=126 mm.] and Schwanz [tail] 4’’ 9’’” [=124 mm.].”’ These measurements do not tally with those taken in the flesh by the collector (see below). Either set of measurements, how- ever, lies within the range of variation for the species. Wagner compared the type of concolor with the larger Hesperomys anguya (= Oryzomys buccinatus Olfers) and noted that in the former the color of the upperparts are much brighter, more reddish, the hair of the underparts pure white, the cheeks without the gray as in anguya, the feet covered with brownish hair, and the tail dark and with short hairs. Field notes by the collector, Johann Natterer, published by Pelzeln (1883) are translated from the German as follows: The tarsus [of the type of concolor] is much broader than that of No. 173 [Hespe- romys russatus Wagner=Holochilus brasiliensis Desmarest]. My dogs found it in the opening of a hollow tree and I got it out with the aid of a mattock. Its color is exactly like that of a reddish, white-bellied mouse from Ypanema [? species]. Incisors ochraceous; ears round, gray brown, the base grayish buff, toes and upperside of tarsus apparently naked and covered with small brown scales on a buffy base where, on closer inspection, extremely fine short hairs become visible. The hairs are somewhat longer at the roots of the claws but do not extend as far as the tips of the claws. Only 6/’’’ [13 mm.] of the base of the tail is covered with fur. Total length, 10’ [=261 mm.], tail 5%’’ [=137 mm.]. The size, color, broad hind foot, and relatively long and thinly haired tail of concolor are diagnostic of Oecomys. There is no other cricetine in the upper Rio Negro region with which it can be confused. SPECIMENS EXAMINED: One hundred and sixty-one, from the follow- ing localities: Costa Rica: San Gerénimo, San José, 1 (CNHM); El General, Puntarenas, 1 (UMMZ); Boruca, 2 (CM). Panama: Bugaba, Chiriqui, 2 (BM, type of tectus; USNM, 1); Barro Colorado, Canal Zone, 1 (UMMZ); Cana, Darién, 11 (USNM, 9 including type of frontalis; CNHM, 2). Cotomstia: Catival, Cérdoba, 1 (CNHM); Socorré, Rfo Sint, Cérdoba, 3 (CNHM); Purif, Rio Cauca, Antioquia, 1 (CNHM); Muzo, Rfo Minero, Boyacé, 2 (CNHM); “W. Cundinamarca,” 1 (BM, type of subluteus); Paime, Rio Minero, Cundinamarca, 3 (AMNH); Pueblo Viejo, Magdalena, 5 (AMNH, 3; MCZ, 2); Concepcion, Magdalena, 1 (MCZ); Palomino, Magdalena, 1 (MCZ); Don Diego, Magdalena, 8 (CM); Bonda, Magdalena, 3 (AMNH); Mamatoca, Magdalena, 1 (AMNH); El Lfbano, Magdalena, 1 (AMNH, type of trichurus); Minea, Mag- dalena, 1 (AMNH, type of mincae; Pueblo Bello, Magdalena, 3 (USNM); El Salado, Magdalena, 5 (USNM); El Orinoco, Rfo Cesar, Magdalena, 7 (USNM); Villanueva, Magdalena, 6 (USNM); Sierra Negra, Sierra de Periji, 4 (USNM); Las Marimondas, 2 (USNM); Mambita, Cundinamarca, 2 (AMNH); Medina, Cundinamarca, 1 (AMNH); Buenavista, Meta 5 (AMNH); Guaicaramo, Meta, 2 ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 553 (AMNH); Villavicencio, Meta, 2 (AMNH, types of helvolus and vicencianus) ; Maipures, Rfo Orinoco, Vichada, 1 (BM, type of marmosurus). VENEZUELA: Rfo Cogollo, Mérida, 1 (CNHM); La Azulita, Mérida, 4 (CNHM); Mérida, Mérida (includes Cafetos de Mérida, Milla, Lourdes, Chama, Montes de la otra banda) 37 (BM, type of flavicans; AMNH, 23; CNHM, 3; USNM, 10); Caicara, Rio Orinoco, Bolivar, 4 (AMNH, includes type of catcarae); El Yagual, 1 (AMNH, type of klagesi); Rio Casiquiare, Amazonia, 1 (AMNH); Rfo Casi- quiare, near Raudal Tamasd, Amazonia, 1 (AMNH); El Merey, Rio Casiquiare, Amazonia, 2 (AMNH); Esmeralda, Rio Orinoco, Amazonia, 3 (AMNH); Ihuapo, Rio Orinoco, Amazonia, 1 (AMNH); Rfo Ocama, mouth, at Rio Orinoco, Ama- zonia, 3 (AMNH). Braziu: Jauaraté, Rio Uaupés, Amazonas, 1 (AMNH); Yavanari, Rio Negro, Amazonas, 1 (AMNH); Igarapé Piaba, mouth, Rio Amazonas, Pard, 1 (MCZ); Lago Cuiteud, Rio Amazonas, Pard, 1 (MCZ); Rosarhinho, Lago Miguel, Rio Madeira, Amazonas, 1 (AMNH); Tauary, Rio Tapajéz, Pard, 2 (MCZ); Ilha Manapiri, Rio Tocantins, Pard, 1 (AMNH); Bardo de Melgago, Mato Grosso, 3 (AMNB#). Oryzomys concolor speciosus J. A. Allen and Chapman Oryzomys speciosus J. A. Allen and Chapman, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 5, p. 212, 1893; vol. 9, p. 18, 1897 (Caparo, Trinidad).—Goodwin, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 102, p. 300, 1953 (type history and measurements). Oryzomys trinitatis J. A. Allen and Chapman, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 5, p. 213, 1893 (type locality, Prince’s Town, Trinidad); vol. 9, p. 18, 1897 (Trini- dad: Caparo; Caura).—Tate, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 76, p. 190, 1939 (Bartica, British Guiana; Arabupu, Mt. Roraima, and Sucre, Venezuela; and Trinidad. Synonyms: palmarius, fulviventer)—Goodwin, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 102, p. 301, 1953 (type history and measurements). Oryzomys palmarius J. A. Allen, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 12, p. 211, 1899 (type locality, Quebrada Seca, Rfo Manzanares, Cumanacoa, Sucre, Venezuela; another specimen from Los Palmales, Sucre).—Goodwin, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 102, p. 301, 1953 (type history; ‘‘may be a subspecies of O. ffavicens [sic =flavicans] Thomas’’). Oryzomys fulviventer J. A. Allen, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 12, p. 212, 1899 (type locality, Quebrada Seca, Cumanacoa, Sucre, Venezuela).—Goodwin, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 102, p. 301, 1953 (type history and measure- ments). Ccomys guianae Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 8, vol. 6, p. 187, 1910 (type locality, Supinaam River, Demerara, British Guiana).—Anthony, Zoologica, vol. 3, No. 18, p. 274, 1921 (Kartabo, British Guiana). Oecomys guianae guianae, Tate, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 76, p. 198, 1939 (listed). CGcomys splendens Hayman, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 11, vol. 1, p. 381, 1938 (type locality, Mayaro, southeastern Trinidad). Oecomys auyantepui Tate, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 76, p. 193, 1939 (type locality, southern slopes of Mt. Auyan-tepuf, Rio Caroni, Bolivar, Venezuela, altitude, 3,500 feet)—Goodwin, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 102, p. 302, 1953 (type history and measurements). Type: Adult female, skin and skull (AMNH 5942/4672) collected Apr. 26, 1893, by Frank M. Chapman. TYPE LocauLity: Prince’s Town, Trinidad. 554. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Disrrisution: Trinidad, the Guianas, and eastern Venezuela, including the coast and delta and basin of the lower Rfo Orinoco; altitudinal range from sea level to about 1,500 meters above. Cuaracters: Like concolor but darker throughout; upperparts tawny finely ticked with dark brown; underparts gray, sometimes whitish or buffy with the plumbeous basal portions of the hairs showing through. MEASUREMENTS: See table 8. Variation: Underparts vary from whitish to dark gray with or without a light buffy wash. In all specimens, however, the basal portions of the hairs of belly and chest are plumbeous and show through the surface. A pectoral streak is present in the two speci- mens from Caura, Trinidad, and in the specimens from Quebrada Seca and Neveri, Venezuela. Remarks: Of a series of four specimens collected in Prince’s Town, Trinidad, Allen and Chapman described one as Oryzomys speciosus and the others as O. trinitatis. The basal portions of the belly hairs in the first are more nearly white than in the others. The authors noted that “in size, proportions and coloration [speciosus] strongly suggests Hesperomys concolor Wagner.” Paradoxically, they failed to recognize the same relationship to the specimen they named trinitatis. Oryzomys palmarius J. A. Allen and Oryzomys fulviventer J. A. Allen are likewise based on differently colored individuals of a small series taken from Noy. 23 through Dec. 10, 1898, in Quebrada Seca, Sucre, Venezuela. In the first, the underparts are typically grayish white with the dark basal color of the hairs showing through. In the second, the belly is buffy, the throat whitish. When Thomas erected the subgenus Oecomys in 1906, he failed to in- clude in it the named forms speciosus, trinitatis, palmarius and fulviven- ter. A consequence of the omission was a dual system of classification and the multiplication of names for the eastern Venezuelan and Guianan race of Oryzomys concolor. Thus, Oecomys guianae Thomas, described in 1910, was compared only with marmosurus of Venezuela and tapa- jinus of Brazil, while Oecomys splendens Hayman was described in 1938 as the first Trinidad record of arboreal rice rats. The two specimens from Auyan-tepui, on which the description of Oecomys auyantepur Tate is based, are colored like other mainland representatives of speciosus. ‘Their shorter hind feet and narrower zygomatic plates, however, are more nearly as in O. bicolor. A skull only from Kartabo, British Guiana, also has the narrow zygomatic plate. Its small molars also indicate affinity with O. bicolor. Osten- sibly, the large and small species of arboreal rice rats have not diverged as widely in the Guianan region as they have elsewhere. 505 ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ -xo9 ue oq ABU YY ‘UIOM A[IUMIOI}XO SIC[OUL UIA (Sefer HNIAV) ATUO [[NyS V er “WOJdLIosep [BUISIIO WOT ‘sBUOYL, aunINb Jo OdA YF, gt "4070014 ShuozfhiQ JO [eNPLAIPUI a31e] ATIUIII3 epeiqenyd ‘AjI[voo] ed A, *MO1 Je[OUL 10} 9'F PUB ‘{[N¥S JO q4ZUCT [eseq-O[Apuod IOJ 9°8Z ‘JOO} PULY IOJ ‘WIT EF SOAIS 032, ‘TINg) So61 ‘UIMpOOy WOJ] MOI IvjOM PUB YYpPvoIq O1YwUI0ZAzZ ‘AAp “4OOJ PUT 11 ‘UOI}AIIOSOp [BUISIIO WO ‘aj BJ, NdayuvAnd jo edd, ot “WNpeqnsg 6 “UOMALIOSOP [VUISIIO WOT MOTT W “VW 'f 4azwaarpnf yo ad, 5 “(206 “d ‘ZOT “JOA “ISTH “JN “sayy “Jeury "Bddg “UOT}C1Osep [CUISIO WOT ‘UdTTW “Wf snzuvwjpd Jood Ay, ; “WIM 63 = YSU] |BSVq-OJAPUOD 4 "MBO INOYITM ¢ *[OGOo[S UI psArosoid UeuITO8ds MOI} SJUOMIAMSeeUT [BUIO}X9 /WOT4ZAIIOSep [VUIZIIO WO ‘uRUARTT Suapuazds jo eddy, 5 ‘UOTJAIIOSap |VU[SIIO MIO ‘Ue[TW “WL $27092U227 JO SGA, ¢ “Y}3Ud[ UAOID ¢ ‘UOTJdIJOSsp [VUTSIIO UOJ ‘UaITW “Vf Ssnsozads Jo odAy, 1 L LY £8 = t6F ae ¥§ es V8 9% og 08 LZ toP aa ae ¥¢ ol = 64 82 = 20°¢ = a 20°¢ —< Le ‘ve e'9 ‘Fg 0°8 ‘62 8's Vg ¥8 9¢ Q°g 62 sé 1g 6°38 — o°¢ — 3 Tg 0'8 = cup ¥'8 = top Z TpIm MOI Ieloul 93v1d Jo [4309] BUIOISeIC. Oe ULOsAZ IBlOOALV os Lg BUTUIeIOT OAISTOUT Hg ‘8°¢ 9°9 6g 69 39 qypra UWINISOY O°9T LT WLI ‘GOT O'LT FLT Q°ST 9'9T SLT SLT TY pvolq dIYVULOZAZ GSE “BIE PEE ote ors = OCE GCE S'0€ sud] 4so} 8013 “TIn4AS 9T Bid § 96 got 16 9Si vG OIT ee 4 €&T 13 6FT LG = Ka 6El ¥G OST RG ELG SCT ‘CET — 1&1 = cor 9% Tel 9 SZ OFT 9% SST GG SFI 174 LET joo} PUI} TeL GZI ‘Se L&T OIT 6cT OIT €2T iat Apoq pue peeyy ¢] OGUALE MY z ulueuIdng VNVIO4) HSILINg ndnqeiy IndajusAny o JVdequesny WoAeN 6 8098 "O g 08g *O 1 809g OD VIGOAZINTA BMeO S}8d “48 woeulng PoRRy ueg 7 OLBABIAT UAMO,], $,90UlIg ¢ UMOT, S,e0ULIg 1 UMOYL, $00 avaINiaT, Aqyeoo'T *(pajou asanayj0 asaym ydaoxa) sznpo fo (Suajawmipjiu UL) sJUaweinsDayy :unuwdnyD puv Uap “p's snsoweds 1ojooUCD sATMIOZAIO-—'Q ATAV], 556 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 SPECIMENS EXAMINED: Twenty-eight, from the following localities: TRINIDAD: Prince’s Town, 4 (AMNH, includes types of speciosus and trinitatzs) ; Caura, 2 (AMNH); Mayaro, 1 (BM, type of splendens); Cumaca, 1 (AMNH); St. Pats, 1 (AMNH); San Rafael, 1 (CNHM). VENEZUELA: Quebrada Seca, Sucre, 5 (AMNH, includes types of palmarius and fulviventer); Neveri, Sucre, 3 (AMNH); San Rafaél, Sucre, 1 (CM); Rfo Yurudn, Bolivar, 1 (AMNH); Auyan-tepui, Bolivar, 2 (AMNH, includes type of auyanteput); Arabupu, Mt. Roraima, Bolivar, 2 (AMNH). British Guiana: Kartabo, 4 (BM, type of guianae; AMNH, 3). Oryzomys concolor superans Thomas (Ecomys superans Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 8, vol. 8, p. 250, 1911; ser. 10, vol. 2, p. 261, 1928 (San Jerénimo, Peru, 1,000 feet altitude; palmeri Thomas, a synonym). Oryzomys (Oecomys) superans, Sanborn, Publ. Mus. Hist. Nat. ‘Javier Prado,” ser. A, Zool., No. 6, p. 21, 1951 (Quincemil, Cuzco, Peru). comys palmeri Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 8, vol. 8, p. 251, 1911 (type locality, Canelos, Rfo Bobonaza, upper Rio Pastaza, Napo-Pastaza, eastern Ecuador; altitude 2,100 feet). Ccomys melleus Anthony, Amer. Mus. Nov., No. 139, p. 4, 1924 (type locality, Zamora, Santiago-Zamora, eastern Ecuador, altitude 3,250 feet.—Goodwin, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 102, p. 302, 1953 (type history and measure- ments). (comys osgoodi Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 9, vol. 14, p. 287, 1924 (type locality, Moyobamba, Amazonas, Peru; altitude about 820 meters above sea level); ser. 9, vol. 19, p. 369, 1927 (Yurac Yacu, San Martin, Peru); ser. 9, vol. 20, p. 601, 1927 (Tingo Maria, Peru, 2,000 feet altitude; measurements). Oecomys osgoodi, Laurie, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 12, vol. 8, p. 276, 1955 (Rio Tigre, Ecuador, 2,000 feet altitude). Oryzomys auriventer, J. A. Allen (not Thomas), Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 35, p. 118, 1916 (Zamora, Ecuador) [= type series of O. melleus Anthony]. Typre: Adult female, skin and skull (BM 11.7.19.12) collected Apr. 28, 1910, by M. G. Palmer. Type LocaLity: Canelos, Rio Bobonaza, Napo-Pastaza Province, eastern Ecuador; altitude, 640 meters above sea level. DistriBpuTION: Base, lower slopes, valleys, and foothills of the Andes drained by the Amazon in Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru, from approximately 200 to 1,200 meters above sea level. CuHaractsers: Largest and darkest of the subspecies; upperparts and sides tawny, the back evenly mixed or heavily lined with dark brown; underparts gray to buff or ochraceous orange, the dark plumbeous basal portions of the hairs showing through; throat and chest not markedly different from belly. MEASUREMENTS: See table 9. VARIATION: Twenty-five specimens of superans taken during the dry season (January-March) along the upper and middle Rio Caqueta (Florencia; Mecaya; Tres Troncos) vary considerably inter se. A few in prime pelage show either the dark color phase or the bright color ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 557 phase on upperparts and sides. Most of the other specimens are in old worn pelage of one color phase with patches of new pelage of the other phase. Underparts range from ‘‘dirty gray,” sharply defined from sides, to gray washed with buff on chest and belly and hardly or not at all defined from sides. The arboreal rice rats of the rain forests of eastern Ecuador vary like the preceding but average darker, especially on the underparts. Twenty-two adults and subadults at hand collected in February, March, June, August, October, and November reveal no seasonal molt pattern. One specimen collected in each of the months of February, August and October is in old pelage. Others taken at the same times and during other months of the year are in good to prime pelage. Specimens from higher altitudes in the valleys and slopes of the Andes (Zamora and Chonta Urcu in Ecuador; Moyobamba, Amazonas, and Hacienda Exito, Huanuco, in Peru) are smaller, have longer pelage and are more richly colored, especially on underparts, than their relatives from the base of the Cordillera. REMARKS: Oryzomys concolor superans is the most distinctive race. The transition in eastern Colombia from concolor of Orinoco drainage to the larger darker superans of Amazonian drainage seems to be abrupt. Likewise, the contrast between smaller white-bellied roberts of northwestern Bolivia and swperans of southeastern Peru is sharp. Oecomys palmeri Thomas is merely a small topotype of superans collected the same day by the same collector. Four specimens from Zamora, eastern Ecuador, first recorded by J. A. Allen as Oryzomys aurwenter, were described as Oecomys melleus by Anthony. They average slightly smaller with underparts more generally ochraceous orange. Individually, however, they are indistinguishable from other eastern Ecuadorian representatives of superans. The type of Oecomys osgoodi Thomas is another small individual of superans. Its author compared it with O. palmeri only. In 1927, Thomas (Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 10, vol. 2, p. 261) observed that palmeri was ‘not really distinct from @. superans’’ and that the Peruvian ‘‘bush rat” was also the same. He concluded that ‘‘throughout the tropical re- gions of S. America almost every district has two members of this genus—a large one, the size of a rat [=concolor], and a much smaller one, that of a large mouse [=bicolor].”’ SPECIMENS EXAMINED: Sixty-three, from the following localities: Cotomsia: Florencia, Caquetdé, 1 (CNHM); Tres Troncos, Rio Caquetd, Putu- mayo, 7 (CNHM); Rio Mecaya, Rio Caquetdé, Putumayo, 17 (CNHM). Ecuapor: Rio Napo, Napo-Pastaza, 1 (UMMZ); Llunchi, Rio Napo, Napo- Pastaza, 1 (UMMZ); Chonta Urcu, Napo-Pastaza, 6 (MCZ, 4; CNHM, 2); Canelos, Rio Bobonaza, Napo-Pastaza, 3 (BM, types of swperans and palmeri; VOL. 110 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM 558 sé sg “$8 Lg 9:9 08 Le] 26 9°¢ U9 £8 ‘Se (ee Lg ‘g°¢ ‘gg 16 ‘9°8. ‘28 £°9 ‘e'9 ‘9°9 £'9 ‘3'9 ‘G9 Leos ag “Eg 18 ‘F'8 g'¢ “Bg T'9 ‘8°9 oe oe ae og = oe ‘Te g'g ‘279 18 ‘28 6'g ‘o°9 0°9 ‘2'9 = vg = 09 as ee ‘Te 9°¢ ‘0'9 16 ‘F'8 Lo ‘69 €°9 ‘g°9 OF E-TE)E'S | 9(6'S-9'9)8'9 | 9(L'6-2°8)Z'6 | 9(8°9-6'9)%'9 | $(6'9-6'9)E°9 e'€ ‘e's L'9 ‘F'9 0'6 ‘6'8 Z'9 ‘69 €'9 ‘8°¢ Bese SE T'9 ‘9°9 ‘g°¢ 16 ‘2°8 ‘8°8 19 ‘G9 ‘FG 9'9 ‘09 “6°e ye ‘9° ‘SE | BE ‘B'S ‘2:9 [FOL ‘OOT‘T6| wz ‘2999 | SZ ‘OZ ‘g'9 oe 8g TOL Z9 GL == 9° == a9 > = a9 = £9 a9 TF 8'¢ 66 89 69 08 (6'-0'8)5"e 06(0°9-B"S)L°S |67(1OT-8°8) F'6 | 61 (8°9-1'S) T°9 81(8'2-9°9)8°9 AMOI Ivjour TIP oyed-| jo qZueT elo SBI, CUIWILIOJ IPI dI}eULOSAZ IB[OVATY OAISIOUT mIn14s0y SST O'8T LSt ‘SLT ‘P81 LT ‘6'9T 9°9T 691 ‘TAT SLT TLT ‘6°21 G(0'0-F' LI) FST LST ‘S°LT O81 “2°21 “FLT OGL ‘FIZ ‘0°61 F'61 OLT L8t 88 A1(8°61-6'9T) 8°81 Qypvoiq OI;VULOBAZ “UOI{ALOsep [BUISIO ULOIJ ‘seuIOY,L, 2p00bso yo edA GZ, 5. “TOLJALOsep PVUIZIIO WO’ ‘AMOTAUYW snazzaw Jo sdAy g UOI4ALosep [BUISIIO Woy ‘svUIO,L, tawpod Jo adAy, 5 “MBO JDOUITM ¢ “HOT AiWosep [VUISIIO Wod ‘seMOyL, suosadns Jo odAY, g “wADIOVY OY PUT ‘SOdTOLL SALT, ‘vloMelO[,] WOI suouMOeds y[Nps [[e sopnyauy ; a a Se T'98 o'FE 9°98 ‘6'FE ‘OFS FES ‘HSE ats T'8 ‘8° o°eé 6'FE ‘8'FE G(hLE-9'FE)S9E PLE ‘6'PE OLE ‘“b'FE “O'ES 8'8E ‘8°28 ‘SLE SLE PEs Sle TL& LI LT 61 ‘OT ‘ST 61 §(0G-S1)81 02 ‘0Z LY ‘OT‘L1 LI ‘02 ‘8T ST LI ST GI (6° LE-9°ZE) FE | LT (1-21) 81 qysuvey © 4se.vels ‘TTnyS IVT 6G 81 EST jopeiojogn Boog 8% . 091 Cel eyUBnYyeI] 08 ‘22 ‘6% | OLT ‘O9T ‘OST | TOT ‘EST ‘EFT cyedRoiey = TSI iva edwmed eT _ — — OUR 8 9S OFT 0ZT | 9 BQuIeqosOW Awad 8% ‘6% OST ‘OST OFT ‘O8T BIOWCZ 8% OST OFT g BIOWIVZ, 0g ‘Ie O9T ‘O9T OFT ‘OFT | NOIQ BQUOTO 7(TE-6Z) 08 | S(GLI-SST)69L |9(S9I-SEI)FST | noex opurg Tg ‘08 G8 ‘SLT SST ‘CT erenqided, Ze ‘Te ‘0 | OBT ‘SOT ‘OLT | OST ‘291 ‘OFT TUIny cue R 8% ‘OE ‘OF | SBI ‘SST ‘89 | ZOT ‘ZLT ‘est OATCIUO TL 6% CLI COL sojousyp, 6 0S 9ST 181 SOTOUBD 21g 661 OST z SOTIULD 1 SLI EST Tqounyy wodavaoyg 06 (GE-8Z) 08 191 (G8I-SST)VLT |67(QLI-IF1) 2ST 1 gjonbeo VIE WOTTON joo} pul Te Apoq A4L[ROO'T pues pray . ‘aauy) UDY) a1oU Uayn ‘suamoeds fo saquin yy) (saunbif oye fig payworpur *s]npy fo (SLajawMyIwW UL) SJUaWaInsHapy sspwoy yz, suBIadNS Io[OOUOD SAWIOZAIQ— 6 ATAV IT, ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 559 AMNH, 1); Montalvo, Rfo Bobonaza, Napo-Pastaza, 3 (CNHM); Rio Pindo Yacu, Napo-Pastaza, 5 (CNHM); Yana Rumi, Napo-Pastaza, 3 (CNH M); Capa- huari, Napo-Pastaza, 2 (CNHM); Zamora, Santiago-Zamora, 4 (AMNH, in- cludes type of melleus). Peru: Moyobamba, Amazonas, 1 (BM, type of osgoodt); Hacienda Exito, Rfo Cayumba, Huanuco, 2 (CNHM); Satipo, Junin, 1 (MCZ); La Pampa, Puno, 1 (MCZ); Quineemil, Cuzco, 3 (CNHM); Itahuania, Madre de Dios, 1 (CNHM);: Boca Colorado, Madre de Dios, 1 (CNHM). Oryzomys concolor roberti Thomas Rhipidomys roberti Thomas, Proc. Zool. Soc. London (1903), No. 2, p. 237, 1908. [Oryzomys (icomys)] Roberti, Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 18, p. 445, 1906. (E[comys] robertt, Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 8, vol. 3, p. 378, 1909 (comparison). Oecomys robertt, Vieira, 1945, Arg. Zool. Sio Paulo, vol. 4, p. 428, 1945 (Fazenda Aric’, Rio Aric&, Mato Grosso, Brazil). Oryzomys (Gicomys) mamorae Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 18, p. 445, 1906 (type locality, ‘‘Mosetenes,” upper Rio Mamoré, Yungas, Cocha- bamba, Bolivia). (Ecomys mamorae, Osgood, Field Mus. Nat. Hist., zool. ser., vol. 10, p. 206, 1916 (Todos Santos, Rio Chaparé, Cochabamba, Bolivia). Typ: Adult male, skin and skull (BM 3.7.7.67) collected July 6, 1902, by Alphonse Robert. TypE Locauity: Santa Ana de Chapada, Mato Grosso, Brazil; alti- tude, 800 meters above sea level. Distrisution: Northern Bolivia in the departments of Beni, Cochabamba, Santa Cruz, and Chuquisaca west into Mato Grosso, Brazil, in the Rio Paraguay basin; altitudinal range approximately 200 to 1,500 meters above sea level. CHARACTERS: Smaller and paler than superans; upperparts buffy to tawny mixed with dark brown, underparts entirely white and sharply defined from sides, or, sometimes, with a buffy or ochraceous wash on chest and belly; skull with supraorbital ridges less developed and divergent posteriorly than in other races. M#ASUREMENTsS: See table 10. VaRIATION: The type and two specimens at hand from Mato Grosso, Brazil, are the palest representatives of the species east of the Andes. Specimens from the Bolivian departments of Chuquisaca, Beni, and Santa Cruz show a heavier mixture of dark brown on upperparts and sides. Six specimens from Todos Santos, Rio Chaparé, collected by R. H. Becker, average nearly as dark on upperparts as swperans. The underparts, however, are pure white in two, more or less buffy on belly and midline of chest in the others. Remarks: The clear white or buffy underparts distinguish every member of robertz from superans. On the other hand, subspecies roberti is hardly separable from Amazonian concolor by its paler color, VOL. 110 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM 560 UWOT}ATIOSOP [VUIS]IO WOY ‘svUIOY,L, aDsownw Jo OdAT, ¢ “‘q[Npseqns B JO osoy} O18 UOATS SJUIMIBINSvOUI 4SITT 9 ‘T4ZU0[ UMOIO ¢ “MBO INOUITM 5 “MOFJApIOSOp [VUTZ}IO WOT ‘seUION,L, #74ago4 JO OdAY, + eee oe Use| 62 v9 Lg = GE = ee =s eel eyonoyL, Le ‘s'e ‘oe | 9g ‘Zo ‘og 0'6 ‘98 ‘T'8 L'9 ‘9°9 ‘8°9 99 ‘E'S ‘O'S | 2ST ‘LT ‘O'LT | E'be ‘E'Ee ‘O'ZE = 82 ‘6% ‘8% | OOT ‘SOT ‘OOT | OFT ‘O9T ‘Set eqsyAvuon g ge ‘ee ‘OB | 9°9 ‘eo ‘eg 8°8 ‘9°8 ‘8°L 19 ‘8°¢ ‘2'¢ 09 ‘99 E'S | OLT ‘O'LT ‘6'ST FE ‘2°88 ‘PTE = 62 ‘8% ‘8% | FST ‘IST ‘OFT | GFT ‘LPT ‘eer 9 SOJUBS SOPOT, =z cfg 98 L'g = LI o°§€ = + 22 TOT O&T ¢ S919}9S0 WY VIATIOg = t8y 08 o¢ = O'9T O'CE 9T L198 SPI OIT 1 epedeyo T1zvugq gaps MOI Ivjoul aed Jo 442u9] vuloyseld BUrITAe1Oy qipiaM Weed 4439] eq | 300) pul Ley Apoq Az[e00'T o1VeUl0ZAZ ie[OaaAT Vy QAISIOUT uInd4s0Y o1yeUI0ZAZ 4s0}e013 ‘[[NyYS pus pwoH *(pajou asimaayjo sp ydaoxa) szjnpo fo (siajawrpjiwm UL) sjuawainsnayy :spUoyy, 1}19qQOI 1O]OOUOD sAWIOZAIQ—'OT WIAV, ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 561 slightly larger size, and, more significantly, by its narrower supra- orbital region and weaker temporal ridges. SPECIMENS EXAMINED: Twenty-three, from the following localities: Braziu: Santa Ana de Chapada, Mato Grosso, 1 (BM, the type of roberti); Descalvados, Mato Grosso, 1 (CNHM); Urucum de Corumbdé, Mato Grosso, 1 (CNHM). Bouivia: ‘‘Mosetenes,’’ Cochabamba, 1 (BM, type of mamorae); Todos Santos, Cochabamba, 10 (AMNH, 5; CNHM, 5); Buenavista, Santa Cruz, 6 (CNHM, 5; MACN, 1); Rio Yapacani, Santa Cruz, 1 (MACN); Marbdn, Rio Mamoré, Santa Cruz, 1 (MACN); Ticucha, Rio Capirenda, Chuquisaca, 1 (CNHM). Oryzomys concolor bahiensis, new subspecies Mus cinnamomeus Pictet and Pictet, Notices sur les animaux nouveaux ou peu connus du musée de Genéve, p. 64, pl. 19 (animal), pl. 238, fig. 5 (molars), 1844 (type locality, Bahia, Brazil; name preoccupied by Mus cinnamomeus Lichtenstein, 1830, Darstellung neuer oder weniger bekannter Saugethiere, Berlin, pl. 36, fig. 2 [==Proechimys myosuros Lichtenstein)). Oecomys cinnamomeus, Moojen, Os roedores do Brasil, p. 53, 1952 (Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil). Type: Adult male, skin and skull (CNHM 63780) collected Sept. 19, 1944, by the Servico de Estudos e Pesquisas Sobre a Febre Amarela; original number M 19330. Typr LocaLity: Fazenda Almada, Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil. DistrisuTion: Known only from eastern Bahia, Brazil, but possibly ranges south into Minas Gerais and north and west into the Rio Sao Francisco basin. Cuaracters: Darker throughout than concolor; upperparts tawny, underparts gray with a buffy wash, the slaty basal portions of the hairs of belly, chest and limbs showing through; supraorbital region broad, the ridges well developed and ledge-like. Measurements: Of the type and paratype, respectively, as follows: Head and body, 140, 130; tail, 145, 150; hind foot, dry with claw, 27, 28; weight, —, 57 grams; greatest length of skull, 33.0, 36.6; zygomatic breadth, 18, 16.7; width of rostrum, 5.9, 6.0; nasals, 11.7, 11.5; incisive foramina, 6.0, 5.9; diastema, 8.0, 7.9; alveolar length of molar row, 5.3, 5.3; zygomatic plate, 3.8, 3.4. Measurements of the type of cinnamomeus Pictet and Pictet, given in the original description, are as follows: head and body, 148; tail, 121; hind foot, 27. Remarks: In the type, the upperparts are ochraceous tawny mixed with the dark brown of the guard hairs; a faint ochraceous buff lateral line is present; belly and underside of limbs gray, washed with buff, the slaty basal portion of the hairs showing through; posterior half of chest like belly, anterior portion and throat nearly pure white; tail brown, upperside of metacarpus and metatarsus brownish, digits silvery gray. A paratopotype is hardly distinguishable from the type. 504676—59—_~—-4 062 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 The present specimens agree closely with the original description of Mus cinnamomeus. The colored plate of cinnamomeus, however, shows. the wrist and adjoining part of the arms wholly white. This condition is not only anomalous for Oecomys but is not in accord with the text where it is stated that the anterior and outer sides of the fore- limbs are colored like the dorsal surface of the head and body. The name Mus cinnamomeus Pictet, 1844, is preoccupied by Mus cinna- momeus Lichtenstein, 1830, a Proechimys. SPECIMENS EXAMINED: Two, from Brazil: Almada, Ilhéus, Bahfa, 1, the type (CNHM); Urucutuca, Ilhéus, Bahia, 1 (CNHM). GAZETTEER (With Name of Collector and Name of Species) Bouivia Buenavista (400-500 m.), 17°27’ S., 63°21’ W. Rio Yapacani, Ichilo, Santa Cruz. F. and J. Steinbach; Oryzomys concolor. Chimate (700 m.), 15° S., 68° W. Upper Rio Beni, La Paz. P.O. Simons; O. bicolor. El Palmal (Palmal), 17°05’ S., 65°23’ W. Chaparé, Cochabamba. F. Steinbach; O. bicolor. Marban (240 m.) Rio Mamoré, Beni. F. Steinbach; O. bicolor, O. con- color. ‘‘Mosetenes’”’ (probably a mis- spelling) Upper Rio Mamoré, Yungas, Cochabamba. L. Balzan; O. concolor. Ticuche, (1,500. m.) 20°25! #85, 63°58! W. Rio Capirenda, Chuquisaca. J. Arduz Tardio; O. concolor. Ticunhuaya (1,500 m.), 15°35’ S., 68°10’ W. iti La:Paz: G. H. H. Tate; O. bicolor. Todos Santos (250 m.), 16°40’ §., 6b° 15" W. On Rio Chaparé, Cochabamba. R. H. Becker; O. concolor. Bouivia—Continued Yapacani, Rio Same general collecting locality as Buenavista, Santa Cruz (q.v.). F. Steinbach; O. concolor. BrRaAziIuL Almada (Fazenda) (near sea level), 14°50’ S., 39° W. Tihéus, Bahia. Rockefeller Institution; O. con- color. Arica (Fazenda) (203 m.), 15°45’ S., 55°46’ W. Rio Aric’, Mato Grosso. O. concolor. Baraio de Melgaco (850 m.), 11°52’ S., 60°48’ W. Rio Commemoracao, upper Rio Gy-Parand, Mato Grosso. L.. E. Miller; O. bicolor, O. :con- © 2 color. Descalvados (142 m.), 17°15’ S., 57°48’ W. Mato Grosso. C. C. Sanborn; O. concolor. Igarapé-agu (50 m.), 1°00’ S., 47°35’ W. Between Belém and Braganza, Para. A. Robert; O. bicolor. Igarapé Bravo Rio Tapajéz, Para. A. M. Olalla; O. bicolor. ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 563 Brazit—Continued Ilha de Manapiri Rio Tocantins, Pard. M. Goeldi; O. concolor. Jauaraté [Yauareté] (82 m.), 1°24’ N.; 69°12%W.. Rio Uaupés (left bank), Amazonas. Olalla Bros.; O. concolor, O. bi- color. Jurué, Rio (150.m.), 6°45’ S., 79° W. Amazonas. Garbe; O. bicolor. Limontuba Rio Tapajéz, Para. A. M. Olalla; O. bicolor. Manacapurt, 60°40’ W. Rio Solimées, Amazonas. O. concolor. Marajé (Island) At mouth of Rio Amazonas below the Equator in Pard. O. concolor. Monte Alegre (10 m.), 2°00’ S., 54°04’ W. Rio Solimdes, east of Santarém, Pard. O. concolor. Recreio, 3°30’ N., 61° W. Rio Majary, Amazonas. A. M. Olalla; O. bicolor. Rosarinho (about 25 m.), 3°41’ S., 59°07’ W. Lago Miguel, Rio Madeira. Olalla Bros., O. concolor. Santa Ana de Chapada (855 m.), 12°25) Ss 50°25' W. Mato Grosso. A. Robert; O. concolor. Santa Rosa, 5°20’ S., 55°30’ W. Rio Jamanchim, Rio Tapajéz, Pard. E. Snethlage; O. concolor. Tauary, 3°50’ S., 55°00’ W. Rio Tapajéz, Pard. A. M. Olalla; O. concolor. Urucum de Corumb4, 19°00’ §&., 57°40’ W. Corumba, Mato Grosso. C. C. Sanborn; O. concolor; O. bicolor. Brazit—Continued Urucutuba (near sea level), 14°50’ S., 39°00’ W. Iihéus, Bahfa. Rockefeller Institution; O. con- color. Urup4, 10°50’ S., 61°35’ W. Rio Urup4, a tributary of the Parand, Mato Grosso. L. E. Miller; O. bicolor. Villa Braga, 4°20’ 8., 56°00’ W. Rio Tapajéz, Pard. O. concolor. Yauanari, 0°30’ S., 64°50’ W. Rio Negro, Amazonas. Olalla Bros.; O. concolor. BRITISH GUIANA Barakara, 5°52’ S£ 57228" Wi Canje River, 50 km. southeast of New Amsterdam. W. Beebe; O. bicolor. Bartica (near sea level), 6°24’ N., 58°36’ W. At junction of Essequibo and Mazaruni Rivers, Essequibo. O. concolor. Essequibo River (lower), 6°-7° N., 58°35’ W. S. B. Warren; O. bicolor. Holmia, 4°55’ N., 55°35’ W. Potaro Highlands. M. A. de Freitas; O. bicolor. Kartabo, 6°23’ N., 58°42’ W. At junction of Mazaruni and Cuyuni Rivers, Essequibo. W. Beebe; O. bicolor, O. concolor. Supinaam (River) Demerara; enters mouth of Es- sequibo (q.v.) from west. O. concolor. COLOMBIA Andalucia (630 im.), 75°30’ W. Huila. L. E. Miller; O. bicolor. Bonda (50-80 m.), 11°17’ N., 74°02’ W. Northwest slope of the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Magdalena. Mrs. H. H. Smith; O. concolor. 2°151S N., 564 CoLtomB1a—Continued Buena Vista (1,500 m.), 4°20’ N., 73°40’ W. Above Villavicencio, Meta. Chapman, Cherrie, et al.; O. concolor. Catival (120 m.), 8°17’ N., 75°41’ W. Upper Rio San Jorge drainage, Cérdova. P. Hershkovitz; O. concolor. Conecepcién (La) (about 900 m.), 1TOL NS 23 265 W. Rio San Antonio, northern slope of Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Magdalena. W. W. Brown; O. concolor. Donama. (600 mz), 11°13" N.; 74°00’ W. Northwestern slope of Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Mag- dalena. M. A. Carriker, Jr.; O. concolor. Don Amo [= Donama (q.v.)] Don Diego (sea level), 11°16’ N., 73°37’ W. Northern slope of the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Mag- dalena. M. A. Carriker, Jr., O. concolor. El ‘Libano’ (1,250).m.), ‘11910 N.., 74°00’ W. Northwestern slope of Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Mag- dalena. H. H. Smith; O. concolor. El Orinoco, 10°13’ N., 73°23’ W. Rio Cesar, Magdalena. P. Hershkovitz; O. concolor. El Salado (480 m.), 10°22’ N., 73°29’ W. Southeastern slope of Sierra Ne- vada de Santa Marta, Mag- dalena. P. Hershkovitz; O. concolor. Florencia (450 m.), 1°45’ N., 75°40’ W. Rio Orteguaza, Caqueta. L. E. Miller; O. bicolor. P. Hersh- kovitz; O. concolor. Guaicaramo (about 250 m.), 4°35’ N., 73°00’ W. Northeast of Villavicencio, Rfo Upia, Meta. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 CotomBi1a—Continued Hermano Nicéforo Marfa; O. con- color. Gonzdlez; O. bicolor. Jino Goje, 0°15’ S., 70°28’ W. Rfo Apoporis, Amazonas. I. Cabrera; O. bicolor. Mamatoca (2 m.), 11°15’ N., 74°09’ W. Three miles east of Santa Marta, Magdalena. H. H. Smith; O. concolor. Mambita (700 m.), 4°46’ N., 73°20’ W. Rio Guavio, eastern Cundina- marca. Gonzalez; O. concolor, O. bicolor. Maipures (115 m.), 5°18’ N., 67°50’ W. Rio Orinoco, Vichada. G. K. and 8S. M. Cherrie; O. con- color. Las Marimondas (1,000 m.), 10°52’ N., 72°43" W. Sierra de Perij4, Magdalena. P. Hershkovitz; O. concolor. Mecaya, Rio (185 m.), 0°29’ N., 75°10! W. Rio Caqueté, Putumayo. P. Hershkovitz; O. bicolor, O. concolor. Medina, 4°30’ N., 72°45’ W. East slope of Eastern Andes, Cundinamarca. Hermano Nicéforo Maria; O. con- color. Minca (660 m.), 11°12’ N., 74°04’ W. Northwestern slope of Sierra Ne- vada de Santa Marta, Magda- lena. H. H. Smith; O. concolor. Muzo (1,000-1,300 m.), 5°30’ N., 74°10’ W. Western slope of the Cordillera Oriental, Boyaca. P. Hershkovitz; O. concolor. Paime (1,038 m.), 5°25’ N., 74°10’ W. Cundinamarea. Hermano Nicéforo Maria; O. con- color. ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 565 CoLomB1a—Continued Palomino (about 1,200 m.), 11°17’ N., 73°34’ W. Northern slope of the Sierra Ne- vada de Santa Marta, Mag- dalena. W. W. Brown; O. concolor. Pueblo Bello (1,067 m.), 10°24’ N., 73°43’ W. Southern slope of the Sierra Ne- vada de Santa Marta, Mag- dalena. P. Hershkovitz; O. concolor. Pueblo Viejo (853 m.), 10°58’ N., 73°26’ W. Northern slope of the Sierra Ne- vada de Santa Marta, Mag- dalena. W. W. Brown; O. concolor. Purif (40 m.), 7°25" N.;°75°20' W. Rio Cauca valley above Caceres, Antioquia. P. Hershkovitz; O. concolor. San Antonio, 11°00’ N., 73°26’ W. Rio San Antonio, northern slope of the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Magdalena. W. W. Brown; O. concolor. Sierra Negra (1,265 m.), 10°36’ N., 72°55’ W. Western slope of the Sierra de Perij4, Magdalena. P. Hershkovitz; O. concolor. Socorré (100-150 m.), 7°51’ N. NGoOlLi W. Rio Sind, Cérdova. P. Hershkovitz; O. concolor. Tres Troncos (150 m.), 0°05’ N., CELT W: Right bank, Rfo Caquetd, La Tagua, Putumayo. P. Hershkovitz; O. concolor, O. bicolor. Villanueva (274 m.), 10°37’ N., 72°58’ W. Rio Cesar Valley, Magdalena. P. Hershkovitz; O. concolor. Villavicencio (498 m.), 4°10’ N., 73°40’ W. Meta. G. M. O’Connell; O. concolor. a Costa Rica Boruca (500 m.), 9°04’ N., 83°27’ W. Puntarenas. M. A. Carriker, Jr.; O. concolor. El General (625 m.), 9°21’ N., 83°40’ W. Puntarenas. A. Smith; O. concolor. San Gerénimo (about 150 m.), 9°39’ N., 84°18’ W. Rfo Pirris, San José. C. F. Underwood; O. concolor. EcuapDoR Avila (600 m.), 0°38’ S., 77°25’ W. Rio Suno, Napo-Pastaza. E. J. Brundage; O. bicolor. Canelos (530 m.), 1°35’ 8., 77°45’ W. Rio Bobonaza, Napo-Pastaza. G. H. H. Tate; O. bicolor. M.G. Palmer; O. concolor. Capahuari, Rfo (300 m.), 1°55’ S., 77°20’ W. A tributary of the Rio Pastaza, Napo-Pastaza. R. Olalla; O. concolor. Chonta Ureu (700 m.) Upper Rio Napo, Napo-Pastaza. W. Clark-MacIntyre; O. concolor. Chonta Urcu, east (500 m.) Napo-Pastaza. C. Olalla; O. concolor. Copataza, Rfo (650 m.), 1°45’ S., 77°50’ W. Enters Rio Pastaza, Napo-Pa- staza. M. Olalla; O. bicolor. Gualaquiza (885 m.), 4°22’ N., 78°32! W. Rfo Gualaquiza, Santiago-Za- mora. O. bicolor. Jatun Yacu, Rfo (700 m.), 1°04’ S., 00°47" We Rio Napo, mouth at Puerto Napo. W. Clark-MaclIntyre; O. bicolor. Jollin, Rio (700 m.), 0°45’ S., 77°40’ W. Enters the Misagualli east of Tena. W. Clark-MacIntyre; O. bicolor. 566 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Ecuapor—Continued Llunchi (250 m.), 0°37’ S., 76°46’ W. Rio Napo, Napo-Pastaza. P. Hershkovitz; O. concolor, O. bicolor. Montalvo, 1°40’ S., 77°20’ W. Rio Bobonaza, Napo-Pastaza. R. Olalla; O. bicolor, O. concolor. Napo, Rio Napo-Pastaza L. Séderstrém; O. concolor. Pambilar (20 m.), 1° N., 79° W. Esmeraldas, G. Fleming; O. bicolor. Paramba (1,100 m.), 0°49’ N., 78°22’ W. Rio Mira, Imbabura. R. Miketta; O. bicolor. Pindo Yacu [Pinto Yacu] (250 m.), 2°33) Si 6AS8 OW: Rio Bobonaza near junction with Rio Pastaza. R. Olalla; O. concolor. San José (below) (500 m.), 0°32’ S., 77°26’ W. Rio Payamino, Napo-Pastaza. Olalla Bros.; O. bicolor. Suno, Rfo (below), 0°40’ S., 77°08’ W. Enters Rio Napo, Napo-Pastaza. Olalla Bros.; O. bicolor. Yana Rumi Napo-Pastaza. R. Olalla; O. concolor. Zamora (1,000 m.), 4°10’ S., 78°43’ W. Rio Zamora, Santiago-Zamora. H. E. Anthony; O. bicolor. W. B. Richardson; O. concolor. PANAMA Barro Colorado, Canal Zone. R. K. Enders; O. concolor, O. bicolor. Bogava [Bugaba (q.v.)] Bugaba (250 m.), 8°28’ N., 83°38’ W. Pacific coast, Chiriqui. H. J. Watson; O. concolor. Cana [Santa Cruz de Cana] (600 m.), 7°43’ N., 77°40’ W. Darién. E. A. Goldman; O. concolor. PansMa—Continued Corozal, Canal Zone. O. concolor. Jesusito, Rio (near sea _ level), 8°03’ N., 78°14’ W. A tributary of the Sambu, Darién. T. Barbour and W. 8. Brooks; O. bicolor. Tacareuna (560-600 m.), 8°05’ N., 77°20’ W. Darién. H. E. Anthony; O. concolor. PERU Boca Colorado (279 m.), 12°30’ S., 70°25’ W. Madre de Dios. C. Kalinowski; O. concolor. Camante (2,000 m.), 13°30’ S., 70°50’ W. Near Cadena, Marcapata, Cuzco. C. Kalinowski; O. bicolor. Chanchamayo (1,000 m.), 11°10’ S., 75°20’ .W. Junin. J. M. Schunke; O. bicolor. Curaray, Rfo (mouth) (140 m.), 2°26’ S., 74°04’ W. Loreto. Olalla Bros.; O. bicolor. Exito (Hacienda) (940 m.), 9°25’ 8. Rio Cayumba, Huanuco; the Cayumba enters the Huallaga. E. Heller; O. concolor. Itahuania, 12°40’ S., 71°10’ W. Madre de Dios. C. Kalinowski; O. concolor. Lagarto Alto, 5°55’ S., 74°35’ W. Rio Ucayali, Loreto; the coordi- nates are those of ‘‘Lagarto,’’ which may not be the actual collecting locality. Olalla Bros.; O. bicolor. La Pampa (573 m.), 13°38’ S., 69°36’ W. On road between Limbani and Astilleros, Puno. O. Pearson; O. concolor. Mazdn, Rio (100 m.), 3°20’ &., 73°05’ W. Tributary of Rio Napo, Loreto. Mendo B.; O. bicolor. ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 567 PEeru—Continued Monte Alegre Presumably in Loreto Depart- ment. G. Tessman; O. bicolor. Moyobamba (820 m.), 6°03’ S., 76°58’ W. At head of Rfo Moyobamba, Amazonas. L. Rutter; O. concolor. Pozuzo, 9°55''S.; 75°35! W. Huanuco. E. Heller; O. bicolor. Pucallpa (180 m.), 8°25’ S., 74°35’ W. Loreto. J. M. Schunke; O. bicolor. Puerto Indiana (100 m.), 3°20’ &S., 72°40’ W. North bank of Rio Marajion, above mouth of Rio Napo, Loreto. Olalla Bros.; O. bicolor. Quincemil (680 m.), 13°17’ S., 70°35’ W. Rio Marcapata, Cuzco. C. Kalinowski; O. concolor, O. bicolor. Sagrario (1,020 m.), 69°41’ W. Upper Rio Inambari, Puno. P. O. Simons; O. bicolor. San Jerénimo (300 m.), 7°45’ S., 74°50’ W. Rio Ucayali, Loreto. R. W. Hendee; O. concolor, O. bicolor. Santiago, Rio J. M. Schunke; O. bicolor. Sarayacu, 6°45’ S., 75°15’ W. Rio Ucayali, Loreto. Olalla Bros.; O. bicolor. Satipo, 11°12’ S., 74°32’ W. Junin. O. Pearson; O. concolor. and Gardner; O. bicolor. Tambo Yacu (1,000 m.), 6°00’ S., 1°10) We Rioja, San Martfn. Osgood and Anderson; O. bicolor. Tingo Marfa (700 m.), 9°10’ &., 75°45’ W. Rio Huallaga, Huanuco. R. W. Hendee; O. concolor. 13°55! S., Pearson PreRu—Continued Villa Carmen (Hacienda) (600 m.), 12°52’ S., 71°15’ W. Cosiiipata, Cusco. C. Kalinowski; O. bicolor. Yarinacocha (160 m.), 10°15’ S., 74°45’ W. Rio Ucayali, Loreto. J. M. Schunke; O. bicolor. Yurac Yacu (800 m.), 6° S., 77° W. San Martin. R. W. Hendee; O. concolor, O bicolor. TRINIDAD Caparo Caroni, Port of Spain. F. M. Chapman; O. concolor. Caura Caroni. F. M. Chapman; O. concolor. Cumaca W. G. Downs; O. concolor. Mayaro, 10°20’ N., 61°00’ W. Southeastern Trinidad. O. concolor. Prince’s Town, 10°16’ N., 61°22’ W. Victoria. F. M. Chapman; O. concolor. San Rafael, 10°30’ N., 61°15’ W. F. Wonder; O. concolor. St. Pats W. G. Downs; O. concolor. VENEZUELA Agiita (1,000 m.), 3°22’ N., 65° 35’ W. Southeast slope of Mt. Duida, Amazonas. G. H. H. Tate; O. concolor. Arabupu:’ (280) +m-)}'' 5°03" N.., 60°39’ W. South side of Mt. Roraima, Bolivar. G. H. H. Tate and T. D. Carter; O. concolor. Auyantepuf (1,100 m.), 5°45’ N., 62°30’ W. East of Rio Caroni, Bolfvar. G. H. H. Tate; O. concolor. Caicara’ (146° m.), 7°38’ N.; 66° 10’ W. Right bank Bolivar. G. K. Cherrie; O.’concolor. of Rio Orinoco, 568 VENEZUELA—Continued Cafio. Seco\,.(700', m:),., 3221’ “N., 65°35’ W. Southeast slope of Mt. Duida, Amazonas. Olalla Bros.; O. bicolor. Caroni, Rfo (1,100 m.), 6°00’ N.., 62°45’ W. Cerro Auyantepuf, Bolfvar. G. H. H. Tate; O. concolor. Casiquiare, Rfo (80 m.), 2°48’ N., 65°55’ W. Two miles west of Raudal Yamadd, Amazonas. G. H. H. Tate, Olalla Bros.; O. concolor. Chama (Cafetos de) (1,600 m.), 8°33! N., 71°13" W.. Rio Chama, Mérida. S. Bricefio; O. concolor. Cogollo, Rio (100 m.), 9°55’ N., 72°12’ W. Zulia, Perija. W. H. Osgood and H. B. Conover; O. concolor. El Llagual [Yagual], 7°12’ N., 64°58’ W. Lower Rio Caura, Bolivar. M. A. Carriker, Jr.; O. concolor. El Merey, 3°06’ N., 65°53’ W. Rio Casiquiare, Amazonas. Olalla Bros.; O. concolor. Esmeralda (143 m.), 3°11’ N., 65°33’ W. Mt. Duida, north bank of upper Orinoco. G. H. H.. Tate, Olalla Bros.; O. concolor. Thuapo, 7°00’ N., 65°27’ W. Rio Orinoco, Amazonas. Olalla Bros.; O. concolor. La. Azulita (1,135 m.), 8°43’ N., 71°26" W. Mérida. W. H. Osgood and H. B. Con- over; O. concolor. La Uni6én (150 m:);),7°05’ N., 65°52’ W. Rio Caura, Bolfvar. S. M. Klages; O. bicolor. Los Palmales, 10°30’ N., 64°10’ W. East of Cuman4, Sucre. F. M. Urich; O. concolor. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 11¢ VENEZUELA—Continued Lourdes (Cafetos de) (1,800 m.), SoSSUAING, (Ml 20M, awe Mérida. S. Bricefio; O. concolor. Mérida (1,641 m.), 8°36’ N., 71°09’ W. Mérida. O. concolor. Mérida (Cafetos de) (1,630 m.), 8$°36/Ni 71°09" We Mérida. S. Bricefio; O. concolor. Milla (Cafetos de) (1,630 m.), 8°43" N;, 2°00" Wi: Mérida. S. Bricefio; O. concolor. Milla (Montes de) (1,630-1,670 m.), SP43"" Nua wl, We Mérida. S. Bricefio; O. concolor. Montes de la Otra Banda (1,600- 1,630 m.), 8°37’ N., 71°10’ W. Mérida, Mérida. S. Briceiio; O. concolor. Neveri (750 m.), 10°06’ N., 64°37’ W. Sucre. G. H. H. Tate and H. J. Clement; O. concolor. Ocama, Rfo (150 m.), 2°47’ N., 65°15’ W. At mouth of Rfo Orinoco, Ama- zonas. Olalla Bros.; O. concolor. Quebrada Seca, 10°15’ N., 63°55’ W. Rio Manzanares, Cumanacoa, Sucre. F. W. Urich; O. concolor. Rancho Grande (1,100 m.), 10°21’ N., 67°41’ W. Aragua. G. H. H. Tate and W. Beebe; O. bicolor. San Rafael (900 m.), 10°05’ N., 64° W. Cumanacoa, Sucre. H. J. Clement; O. concolor. Yurudn, Rfo, 6°42’ N., 61°37’ W. Bolivar. M. A. Carriker, Jr.; O. concolor O. bicolor. PROC U.S. NAT. MUS. VOL. 110 HERSHKOVITZ, PLATE 1 palusiris ) (Oryzon ys OP —~ & & 28 EOC Symes a Z, S$ 3 ~ mS ~~ c=) 14); b, 84 R} ip 1d0 mys =, 3 a, ) } 7 olor (CNHM (CNHM 48455); omys (Oecomy. Ory a, | yy rsal PROC. U.S. NAT. MUS. VOL. 110 HERSHKOVITZ, PLATE 2 a, Oryzomys bicolor; b, O. concolor; c, O. palustris; d, Rhipidomys venustus. <2) of same skulls shown in plate I: Ventral aspect ( PROG. US. NAT. MUS: VOL. 110 HERSHKOVITZ, PLATE 3 Lateral aspect (2) of same skulls (with mandibles) shown in plates 1, 2: a, Orvzomys bicolor; b, O. concolor; c, O. palustris: d, Rhipidomys venustus. t B PROC. U.S. NAT. MUS. VOL. 110 HERSHKOVITZ, PLATE 4 Upper and lower molars (10) of same specimens (except as noted) shown in plate 3: a, Oryzomys bicolor (CNHM 18541); 6, O. conc olor; c, O. palustris; d, Rhipidomys venustus. PROC. U.S. NAT. MUS. VOL. 110 HERSHKOVITZ, PLAMTE 5 Dorsal aspect (1-++) of skull in certain subspecies of Oryzomys concolor (a-e) and O. bicolor (f-7), showing variation in size with broad overlapping in the opposite extremes of each species. d-c, Oryzomys concolor superans: a, Male (CNHM 41459), Montalvo, Rio Bobonaza, Ecuador; b, female (CNHM 43257), Rio Pindo Yacu, Ecuador; c, female (CNHM 43252), Yana Rumi, Ecuador. d, e, Oryzomys concolor concolor: d, male (USNM 280563), Pueblo Bello, Colombia; ¢, female (USNM 280583), El Orinoco, Rio Cesar, Colombia. f, g, 1, Oryzomys bicolor bicolor, males: f (CNHM 18541), Holmia, British Guiana; g (UMMZ 80162), 7 (UMMZ 80147), both from Llunchi, Rio Napo, Ecuador. h, J, Oryzomys bicolor phaeotis: h, Female (CNHM 84314), Villa Carmen, Cosnipata, Peru; j, male (CNHM 68638), Camante, Marcapata, Peru. PROC. U.S. NAT. MUS. VOL. 110 HERSHKOVITZ, PLATE 6 Ventral aspect of (1-++) same skulls in same order as shown in plate 5: Oryzomys concolor (a-e) and O. bicolor (7 Hh PROC. U.S. NAT. MUS. VOL. 110 HERSHKOVITZ, PLATE 7 Dorsal and ventral aspect of skull (2) of: a, Oryzomys bicolor (CNHM 84314); 5, O. lon icaudatus (CNHM 24593), HERSHKOVITZ, PLATE 8 110 U.S. NAT. MUS. VOLE PROC INHNO) 5 NJOIYIUDX ‘O ye!) aK IPTST INHNO) Snevyqns ‘O° ‘ =( ‘(90648 INHNO) £42240] ‘O ‘2 *(9SF61 ZS7EF INHINO) 40702"02 0 “4 *(HIEF8 INHNO) 4079209 Shmozhsg ‘D :(Z ) [[nys Fo qoodse [estoqd PROG. USS NAT. MUS. VOL. 110 HERSHKOVITZ, PLATE 9 laticep O ] YANTNEOLUS; @, (OR as subflavus; (Oy h Oryzom AVA) bicolor: ( ) of same skulls shown in plate 8: 4 { aspect Ventral PROC. U.S. NAT. MUS. VOL. 110 HERSHKOVITZ, PLATE 10 Lateral aspect (2) of same skulls shown in plates 8, 9: a, Oryzomys bicolor; b, O. concolor; I i : 3 c, O. subflavus; d, O. xantheolus; e, O. laticeps. PROG. WS. .NAdTIMUS. VOL. 110 HERSHKOVITZ, PLATE 11 Lateral aspect (2) of left mandibles of same skulls shown in plates 8-10: a, Oryzom ,O. subflavus; d, O. xantheolus; bicolor; b, O. concolor; ¢ PROC. US. NAT. MUS. VOL 110 HERSHKOVITZ, REAGE 12 Upper and lower molars (>< 10) of same specimens shown in plates 8-11: a, Oryzomys bi- olor; b, O. concolor; c, O. subflavus; d, O. xantheolus; e, O. laticeps. PROCEEDINGS OF .THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION U.S. NATIONAL MUSEUM Vol. 110 Washington: 1959 No. 3421 THE RODENT-INFESTING ANOPLURA (SUCKING LICE) OF THAILAND, WITH REMARKS ON SOME RELATED SPECIES By Puy.us T. Jounson ' During 1952-55, Robert E. Elbel, Malaria Control Adviser in the North Eastern Provinces, conducted wild-mammal- and_ bird-ecto- parasite surveys for the U.S. Operations Missions to Thailand, International Cooperation Administration. This first such compre- hensive survey in Thailand has proved to be a major contribution to mammalogy, ornithology, and entomology. Mr. Elbel’s collections are the result of one of the first wholehearted attempts to sample populations of a large and representative percentage of the rodent and rodent-ectoparasite species native to Southern Asia, and have therefore provided medical entomology with valuable and unique information on this area of the world. The present paper is an account of the Anoplura collected by Mr. Elbel and his associates, and of a collection made by D. C. and EK. B. Thurman in northeastern Thailand. Of the 18 species repre- sented, 8 are new.?. To date only 4 species of ‘Anoplura have been recorded from Thailand. Of these 4, only 1 was not included in Mr. Elbel’s collections (Hoplopleura pectinata Cummings from Fattus surifer, Trong, Lower Thailand). 1 Entomology Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2 One of the new species collected during the survey will be described in another paper, and is not men- tioned here. 569 570 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 I am indebted to Mr. Elbel for submitting the Thai Anoplura collection for study and deposit in the collections of the U.S. National Museum. Ernestine B. Thurman and the late D. C. Thurman, Jr., kindly donated their collections of Thai Anoplura, which have served as a valuable supplement to Mr. Elbel’s collections. As dictated by the distribution of its hosts, the Thai anopluran fauna is mainly attributable to the Oriental Region, but contains elements from the Palaearctic and Australian Regions as well. One of the species, Polyplax spinulosa (Burmeister), has a cosmopolitan distribution on Rattus species. Probably at least half the species of rodent-infesting Anoplura in Thailand have now been collected. ‘The Anoplura of the primates and ungulates in Thailand remain completely unknown, and those from all the surrounding areas are very poorly known. The description of a new species of Neohaematopinus taken from a flying squirrel from Borneo is included in this paper because this species is very closely allied to one taken from Thai flying squirrels. I am indebted to Lt. Col. Robert Traub, M.S.C., U.S. Army, for donating the specimens from Borneo. David H. Johnson, curator of mammals, U.S. National Museum, determined the hosts reported in this paper. Skins and skulls of these mammals are in the collections of the Division of Mammals. I wish to thank Dr. Johnson for his very necessary and helpful coop- eration. Unless otherwise indicated, all the specimens reported are from Thailand. If there are only two elements in a locality name, they represent the province and the village (Ban) or mountain. If three or more elements are included, they represent the province, the district (Muang), and the village or subvillage or mountain. Provincial names are given in small capital letters. Transliteration of the names follows the U.S. Army Gazetteer for Thailand (1944) with emenda- tions by H. G. Deignan. Collector’s names (Elbel and his associates) have been omitted except in data pertaining to the holotype of each of the new species. Individuals and organizations who cooperated with Mr. Elbel in obtaining the material were: Boonsong Lekagul and H. G. Deignan; and the Banpong Plague Laboratory, the Khorat Plague Laboratory, and the Nakhon Sawan Plague Laboratory. Enderleinellus corrugatus, new species Figures 1-5 Typr pata: Holotype male from Tamiops macclellandi, cHAIYA- PHUM: Phukhieo, Ban Kaeng, Ban Lat, January 16, 1952, RE-355, ANOPLURA OF THAILAND—JOHNSON 571 = lala An t \ > Toa. ——— UD .. pe —t = x : SS eae f Ey = Figures 1—5.—Enderleinellus corrugatus, new species: 1, Paratype 2; 2, Holotype &; 3, Genitalia, holotype o&; 4, Paratergal plates II-VI, paratype 2 ; 5, Thoracic sternal plate, holotype oc’. R. E. Elbel, collector. One paratype female from Tamiops mac- clellandi, cHIENGMAI: Chiengmai, Ban Den, February 6, 1952, D. C. and E. B. Thurman collectors. Holotype deposited in the collections of the U.S. National Museum, type-catalog No. 64381. Diaenosis: FE. corrugatus is close to FE. malaysianus Ferris and E.. dremomydis Ferris. The thoracic sternal plate and male genitalia are much like those of malaysianus. It is easily distinguished from malaysianus in that paratergal plates II-V are heavily ridged and the spiracles are not particularly enlarged. FE. corrugatus has the head almost as broad as long but not noticeably longer, and has spiracles on abdominal segments 3-8, not 3-5 as does malaysianus. In corrugatus, large distinct paratergal plates are present on segments 2-5, a very small plate is present on segment 6, and areas of sclerotiza- tion occur around the spiracles on segments 7 and 8. FE. malaysianus completely lacks plates on segments 6-8. LF. corrugatus is distinct from EF. dremomydis, which has paratergal plates on segments 2-6, in that dremomydis lacks rugosities on these plates, has the plates differently shaped, and has different setation. ie PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Description: Male: Head almost as broad as long; with marked postantennal angles; lateral margins slightly convergent posteriorly; broadly rounded anteriorly; venter very scaly; rostrum opening ventrally; antennae set well back from anterior head margin; seg- ments of antennae distinct and as broad or broader than long. Thorax about as long as head; sternal plate oval, heavily sclerotized laterally. Legs with first and second pairs with well-developed tarsal thumb opposing claw; coxae of first and third pairs noticeably rugose. Abdomen with medium-sized spiracles on segments 3-8; large par- atergal plates on segments 2-5; a very small plate on segment 6; small sclerotizations around spiracles of segments 7 and 8. Par- atergal plate II with one apical seta; plate III with two setae about half length of plate; plate IV with one seta somewhat shorter than plate and one minute seta; plate V with one short and one minute seta; plate VI with two minute setae. Dorsally with one row of setae per segment, a narrow plate associated with each row; setae on segments 4-7 large and inflated, these rows continuous across dorsum and containing 10, 11, 12, and 8 setae, respectively. Ventrally with plates associated with rows of setae on segments 2 and 3 only; setae of segments 3-6 inflated. Genitalia having basal plate with posterior arms about as long as undivided anterior part; endomeral piece broadly U-shaped, with median fracture; pseudopenis elongate- triangular, posterior part lacking rugosities. Female: Head, thorax, and legs asin male. Abdomen with para- tergal plates as in male. Veuntrally, plates associated with rows of setae on segments 2 and 3 only; segments 3-7 with setae inflated; 6 setae in rows on segments 3 and 4; 9-11 setae in rows on segments 5-6; segment 7 lacking setae medially, with 2 setae laterally on each side. Dorsally, plates associated with anterior 4 rows of setae; setae of segments 4-8 inflated ; rows on segments 5-7 containing 11-14 setae, extending completely across dorsum. Genitalia as in figure 1, Lengths: Male 0.58 mm.; female 0.71 mm. Enderleinellus dremomydis Ferris Enderleinellus dremomydis Ferris, Contributions toward a monograph of the sucking lice, pt. 1 (1919), p. 29, fig. 16, 1920; The sucking lice, p. 108, 1951. This species was described from two females found on Dremomys pernyi, West Szechuan, China. New reEcorpD: One female from Dremomys rufigenis, Lornt: Dan Sai, Kok Sathon, Phak Khi Nak Mountain, March 29, 1955, RE-5189. This Thai record is the first since the original description. The specimen agrees well with the original description and the female paratype in the U.S. National Museum collections. The male of dremomydis remains unknown. ANOPLURA OF THAILAND—JOHNSON 573 Enderleinellus kumadai Kaneko FicuREs 6-9 Enderleinellus kumadai Kaneko, Bull. Tokyo Medical and Dental Univ., No. 1, p. 49, figs. 1, 1-8, and 2, 1-2, 1954. Kaneko described this species from the holotype male, allotype female, and four male and seven female paratypes, collected from Callosciurus erythraeus thaiwanensis, O-shima, Tokyo, Japan. ‘The host squirrels are native to Formosa and had escaped from a zoo during World War II to become established on O-shima. New recorps: Three males, one female from Callosciurus sp., NAKHON SAWAN: Bon Phot Phisai, Tha Ngiu, March 30, 1953, RE- 1740. Two females, same data, but RE-1741. One male, one female, same data, but RE-1743. One female from Callosciurus finlaysoni, CHATYAPHUM: Phukeio, Ban Kaeng, Ban Non Taolek, January 16, 1952, RE-361. The specimens reported above agree quite well with Kaneko’s original description and figures. HE. kumadai is related to EL. malay- sianus Ferris, LE. menetensis Ferris, and: /. larisci Ferris—all from Asian squirrels; it may be separated from malaysianus in having paratergal plates on segments 2-4 (2-5 in malaysianus) ; and it differs Ficures 6-9.—Enderleinellus kumadai: 6, Genitalia, @'; 7, 9 ; 8, Thoracic sternal plate, o; 9, Paratergal plates, o’. 574 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 from menetenis, which also has three paratergal plates, in that spiracles are located on segments 3-5, not 3-6 (or 3-8), and the thoracic sternal plate has the sclerotized portion dumbbell-shaped in kumadai rather than entire, and in that the apical setae of paratergal plate ILI are longer than the plate in kumadai. FE. kumadai is closest to LE. larisci but is easily separated as follows: LE. larisci lacks definite postantennal angles on the head and has no apical setae on para- tergal plates IT and IV. E. kumadai has one apical seta on plate II and two on plate IV. In male larisci the endomeres are broadly separated and the pseudopenis very small, whereas kumadai has the endomeres joined medially (although a fracture line is visible in some specimens), and the pseudopenis is large and as long as the parameres. The Thai specimens of kumadai were compared with two male and two female paratypes in the collection of Captain John E. Scanlon. Enderieinellus malaysianus Ferris Enderleinellus malaysianus Ferris, Contributions toward a monograph of the sucking lice, pt. 1 (1919), p. 12, figs. 3-4, 1920; The sucking lice, p. 110, 1951.—Werneck, Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 45, pp. 281, 302, 1947. Ferris described malaysianus from material collected off Calloscwurus caniceps and Callosciurus prevosti from Malaya, Lower Siam, and Borneo. The holotype is from C. caniceps, St. Lukes Island, Mergui Archipelago, Malaysia. New reEcorD: One female from Callosciurus caniceps, NAKHON SsAWAN: Pak Nom Pho, Khao Khat, May 4, 1953, RE-2503. This female has spiracles considerably smaller than the holotype and paratypes in the U.S. National Museum, but agrees well in other respects. Enderleineflus menetensis Ferris Enderleinellus menetensis Ferris, Contributions toward a monograph of the sucking lice, pt. 1 (1919), p. 14, figs. 5-6, 1920; The sucking lice, p. 110, 1951.—Werneck, Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 45, p. 281, 1947. Ferris described FE. menetensis from a series of males and females taken from Menetes berdmorei rufescens, Koh Kut Island, Southeast ‘Siam. The holotype is a male. New record: One male, one female from Menetes berdmorei, KANCHANABURI: Latya, May 17, 1952, F—752. These specimens agree well with the original description and figures except that both sexes have more numerous setae on the abdomen dorsaily and ventrally, chiefly by reason of having three to five setae in each lateral group rather than one or two. Spiracles are present on abdominal segments 3-8 in the present specimens. The spiracles are very small and hard to see unless the specimen is in a favorable ANOPLURA OF THAILAND—JOHNSON 575 position. The paratype female in the U.S. National Museum col- lections has apparent spiracles only on segments 3-6. It is possible that this species has a variable number of spiracles. Hoplopleura malabarica Werneck Fiacures 12-14, 16 Hoplopleura malabarica Werneck, Rev. Brasileira Biol., vol. 14, No. 1, p. 113, figs. 8-12, 1954. Werneck’s type series consisted of the male holotype, female allotype, and one male and four female paratypes from Bandicota malabarica Shaw, Colombo, Ceylon, July 28, 1944, collected by C. D. Radford. New recorps: Many specimens in 27 collections from Bandicota sp., Bandicota bengalensis ssp., and Bandicota indica ssp. from the following localities: cHatyApHUM: Phukhieo, Ban Kaeng, Ban Lat. KANCHANABURI: Tamaka, Luk Kae; Tamaka, Tharua; Latya, Ban Nua; Bo Phloi; and Kanchanaburi District. Loppurt: Khao Oerawan Mt. NAKHON SAWAN: Pak Nam Pho, Khao Khat Mt. rar Burt: Banpong, Pakraet; Banpong, Boekphrai; and Paktho, Phuchik. H. malabarica is a parasite of Bandicota species, and although Rattus species may be found in similar ecological situations together with Bandicota, in only one instance did Elbel collect malabarica from Rattus. Ficures 10-16.—Hoplopleura malabarica and H. hirsuta: 10, Paratergal plates, H. hirsuta, 2 ; 11, Same, o; 12, Same, H. malabarica, 2 ; 13, Same, &; 14, Thoracic sternal plate, H. malabarica, &; 15, Genitalia, H. hirsuta, &; 16, Same, H. malabarica, &. 576 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Werneck compared malabarica to H. hirsuta Ferris (from Sigmodon in the New World). The long series of individuals of malabarica collected by Elbel makes possible an expanded diagnosis and com- parison of this species with hirsuta. In most respects the two species are similar. The thoracic sternal plate is identical and the shape of the paratergal plates very similar. The lateral setae of the abdomen (those occurring off the tergal and sternal plates) are noticeably heavier in hirsuta, although a comparison of actual specimens is necessary to satisfactorily show this difference. The form of the paratergal plates and their setation is highly variable in both species. Female malabarica always have one long apical seta on plates IV-VI (on VI this seta may be very long); the second apical seta on the above plates is minute or absent. One abnormal female examined had two long setae on paratergal plate IV. In hirsuta females plates IV-VI always have two long setae (fig. 10). Para- tergal plate VI of hirsuta usually has two apical angles, although in occasional specimens there are no free angles. Malabarica females have a dorsal angle on plate VI, but usually the ventral angle is rounded and not free. Generally, hirsuta females have more setae in the abdominal rows. Werneck draws and describes the female of malabarica as having neither tergal nor sternal plates on the typical abdominal segments. This condition was not true of the Thai specimens, the plates being invariably present although often ex- tremely narrow and incomplete. In hirsuta females there are always three or more setae laterally off each abdominal plate both dorsally and ventrally, while malabarica females have but one or two setae in these positions. In males of the two species the setation of the paratergal plates is extremely variable. In both hirsuta and malabarica the male usually has one long seta on plates [V—VI with the second seta minute or absent (compare figs. 11 and 13). However, hirsuta males may have two long setae on one or all of plates [V—VI, and both types may be found in a single collection. None of the malabarica males exam- ined had more than one long apical seta on plates [V-VI. Malabarica males generally have fewer setae in the abdominal rows than hirsuta males have. Werneck’s drawing of male malabarica shows no tergal abdominal plates. All the Thai males have a normal number of nar- row tergal plates. The male genitalia of malabarica and hirsuta differ in small but constant fashion. In hzrsuta the parameres (fig. 15) are strongly curved apically so that were the tips joined by an imaginary line the parameres would form an almost perfect semicircle apically. In malabarica the parameres are not so strongly curved inward. The pseudopenis of hirsuta is usually not serrate, and the angle at its broadest point is usually about halfway between the base of the ANOPLURA OF THAILAND—JOHNSON BT pseudopenis and the inner aspect of the tip. In malabarica the pseudo- penis is serrate, and the angle at its broadest point is always much nearer the base of the pseudopenis than it is to the joining of the inner aspect of the tip. Specimens of malabarica illustrated were from Bandicota benga- lensis, RAT BURI, Banpong, Boekphrai. Drawings of male and female paratergal plates of hirsuta were taken from specimens from Florida, and the male genitalia from a specimen from the Panama Canal Zone—all from Sigmodon. Hoplopleura pacifica Ewing Hoplopleura pacifica Ewing, Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bull., No. 14, p. 9, figs. 1b-c, 1924.—Hopkins, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, vol. 119, p. 481, 1949. Hoplopleura oenomydis, Ferris, Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bull., No. 98, p. 121 (in part), 1932; The sucking lice, p. 139 (in part), 1951.—Pritchard, Journ. Parasit., vol. 35, p. 374, 1947. Hoplopleura pacijica was described from five males and seven females collected off Rattus hawaiiensis [Rattus exulans hawatiensis], Hawaiian Islands. New recorps: A long series of specimens from Rattus rattus ssp. from the following provinces: Chiengmai, Rat Buri, Chaiyaphum, Nakhon Ratchasima (—Khorat), and Chiang Rai. H. pacifica is the characteristic louse parasite of Thai F. rattus. Hopkins (1949) records all Hoplopleura specimens from Rattus species as pacifica, not H. oenomydis Ferris, and notes that H. oenomy- dis is restricted, so far as is known, to the African murine genus Oenomys. Diagnoses and descriptions of oenomydis and pacifica, together with host records, are being prepared for publication by Captain John E. Scanlon; therefore, no diagnoses are included in this paper. Hoplopleura thurmanae, new species Fiaures 17-19, 22-23, 25 Tyre pata: Holotype female from Tamiops macelellandi, wort: Dan Sai, Na Phung, Ban Khok, Namlang Mountain, May 29, 1955, RE-5416, R. E. Elbel collector. Allotype male, same data, but June 3, 1955, RE-5512. Paratype male, same data but May 23, 1955, RE-5290. Paratype female, same data, but May 29, 1955, RE-5415. Paratype female, same data, but June 6, 1955, RE-5555. Paratype female, same data, but June 1, 1955, RE-5460. Four male, one female paratypes from Tamiops macclellandi ssp., CHAIYA- PHUM: Phukhieo, Ban Kaeng, Ban Lat, January 16, 1952, RE-355. Four male, four female paratypes, same data, but January 18, 1955, 505126—59——_2 578 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Ficures 17-18.—Hoplopleura thurmanae, new species: 17, Holotype 9; 18, Allotype o. RE-369-371. One male, one female paratypes from Tamiops rodolphei, locality as above, December 19, 1952, RE-931. One female paratype from Tamiops rodolphei, Phukheio, Ban Kaeng, Ban Non Taolek, December 14, 1952, RE-900. One male paratype from Tamiops sp., KANCHANABURI: Bo Phloi, March 26, 1952, RE-563. One male, five female paratypes from Tamiops macclel- landi, cu1ENGMAI: Chiengmai, Ban Den, February 6, 1952, D. C. and E. B. Thurman collectors, TT—23—24. Holotype deposited in the U.S. National Museum, type-catalog No. 64382. Also examined: One male, three females from Menetes berdmorei ssp., KANCHANABURI: Bo Phloi, July 16, 1952, Y—308. This species is named for my friend and colleague, one of the collectors, Dr. Ernestine B. Thurman, Dracnosts: This species is very closely related to Hoplopleura erismata Ferris from Callosciurus species. The female of H. thurmanae ANOPLURA OF THAILAND—JOHNSON 579 has the posterior angles of paratergal plates IV-VI produced into acute points that are almost as long as the apical setae. In erismata the apical angles of paratergal plates ['V—V are very short, obviously much shorter than the apical setae, and paratergal plate VI has scarcely any angles. In the male of thurmanae, the apical angles of paratergal plates 1V—VI are not so long as in the female, but definitely longer than in erismata. H. thurmanae also differs from ertsmata in the shape of the thoracic sternal plate (compare figs. 25 and 26). In thurmanae the plate has definite lateral and anterior angles; in erismata the lateral angles are smoothed out so that the lateral and anterior margins form a continuous curve. Male genitalia of the two species are quite different (compare figs. 23 and 24). Description: Female: Head rounded anteriorly, postantennal angles definite but rounded; postantennal head margins slightly convergent posteriorly. Thorax with thoracic sternal plate diamond- shaped, the posterior angle more produced than the anterior angle. Abdomen with outermost of the two modified setae on the first sternal plate of segment 3 usually definitely bent. Typical abdominal segment with three narrow sternal and tergal plates; both dorsally and ventrally with one seta lateraily on each side, off the plates. Paratergal plates as in figure 22; plates IV-—V produced inward anteriorly toward the midline both dorsally and ventrally. Plates IV-VI with apical angles produced mto long acute points which are almost as long as the apical setae; plate VII lacking posterior angles but not much reduced. Male: Head as in female except third antennal segment with a short stout dorsal seta. Thorax as in female. Abdomen with outer- most of the two modified setae on the first sternal plate of segment 3 usually definitely bent. Sternal and tergal plates as in genus, nar- rowed but not strongly reduced; one or two setae laterally off tergal plates of segments 4—6, and one seta laterally on sternites 4-6, midway between the two sternal plates of each of these segments. Paratergal plates IV-VI and sometimes VII anteriorly produced inward toward midline both dorsally and ventraily. Plate VII not noticeabiy re- duced; plates IV—VI with posterior angles produced into points that are not so long as in female, being no more than half the length of the apical setae. Genitalia with parameres poorly sclerotized, particularly basally; pseudopenis with triangular flanges on each side at about middle, its apex triangular, slightly serrate. Lengths: Female 1.15-1.2 mm.; male 0.85 mm. One collection of H. thurmanae was taken from Menetes, but that this is a normal occurrence needs to be confirmed. 580 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 Hoplopleura erismata Ferris Figures 20-21, 24, 26 Hoplopleura erismata Ferris, Contributions toward a monograph of the sucking lice, pt. 2, p. 113, figs. 72B, 72E, 72F, 1921; The sucking lice, p. 136, 1951. Ferris described erismata from Thailand from Callosciurus ferrugineus, C. caniceps, and Tamiops sp. Holotype female from C. ferrugineus, Southeast Siam. It is very likely that the specimens taken from Jamiops were actually H. thurmanae. New rREcoRDS: Two males, two females from Callosciurus finlaysoni tacherdi, NAKHON RATCHASIMA (=KHORAT): Sikhui, Pakchong, June Se a —— —_ / fe Bw) 4 "\ 4, (y ) Ficures 19-26.—Hoplopleura thurmanae, new species, and H. erismata: 19, Head, H, thurmanae, holotype 2 ; 20 Same, H. erismata, ? ; 21, Paratergal plates II-VI, H. erismata. 2; 22, Same, H. thurmanae, holotype 9 ; 23, Genitalia, H. thurmanae, allotype &; 24, Same, H. erismata, oc’; 25, Thoracic sternal plate, H. thurmanae, holotype 9 ; 26, Same, H. erismata, 2. ANOPLURA OF THAILAND—JOHNSON 581 6, 1952, Y-216-221. Five females from Callosciurus caniceps, CHIANG RAI: Chiang Saen Khao, Ban Sop Luak, March 2, 1953, RE-2340. One male from C. caniceps, KAMPHAENG PHET: Khlong Khlung, Ban Hua Thanon, April 4, 1953, RE-2365. Two males, five females from C. caniceps, NAHKON SAWAN: Pak Nam Pho, Khao Khat Mt., May 13, 1953, RE-2539. One female from C. caniceps, torr: Dan Sai, Kok Sathon, Phu Lom Lo Mt., February 28, 1955, RE-4824. A series of males and females from Callosciurus finlaysoni, Dan Sai, Kok Sathon, Phu Lom Lo Mt. and Phak Khi Nak Mt., February and March 1955, RE-4800, 5018, 5058, 5063, and 5105. A series of males and females from C. finlaysoni, Dan Sai, Na Phung, Ban Khok, Namlang Mt., May and June 1955, RE-5399, 5486, 5546, and 5585. H. erismata is easily determined by reference to the original descrip- tion and drawings by Ferris. It should be added that in the male, paratergal plates IV-VI (not IV and V as in the female) have the anterior angles strongly produced toward the midline of the body. The paired modified setae on the first sternal plate of abdominal segment 3 are often not so strongly developed as in most species of Hoplopleura, although this is not always the case, and sometimes the outer setae may be not only heavy but noticeably bent. Lengths: Male 0.95-1.1 mm.; female 1.3-1.5 mm. Neohaematopinus callosciuri, new species FIGuRES 27-28, 34b, 35c, 42-43 Neohaematopinus sciurinus, Ferris, Contributions toward a monograph of the sucking lice, pt. 4, pp. 244, 245, 1923 (in part, records from Callosciturus).— Hopkins, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, vol. 119, pp. 459, 460, 1949 (records from Callosciurus). Type pata: Holotype male, allotype female, and two male and four female paratypes from Callosciurus jfinlaysoni, tort: Dan Sai, Kok Sathon, Phu Lom Lo Mt., February 26, 1955, RE-4800, R. E. Elbel collector. A series of 179 male and female paratypes from Callosciurus Jfinlaysoni, C. caniceps and C. erythracus from the following provinces: Loei, Chaiyaphum, Rat Buri, Kanchanaburi, Nakhon Sawan, Nakhon Ratchasima, Prachuap Khiri Khan, Chiang Rai, Kamphaeng Phet, and Lop Buri, collected 1952-55. Two male and one female para- types from C. erythraeus, Formosa: Ma-an Lio, April 12, 1952, D. H. Johnson collector, DJ—7274. One male and two female paratypes, same data, but April 19, 1952, H. J. Stanton collector, JHS-6. One male paratype, same data, but April 16, 1952, JHS-3. Holotype deposited in the collection of the U.S. National Museum. type-catalog No. 64383. 582 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VoL. 110 js NCS ) =_ Sele Ge BY >: Ne! nx A A, See 28 et A I_]= =a) ar aa r iret So. Kx , SS zi hey Ke ee \eaeek heat} = Ficures 27-33.—Neohaematopinus callosciurt, new species, N. scturinus, and N. semi- fasciatus: 27, N. callosciuri, allotype 9 ; 28, N. callosciuri, holotype &*; 29, Abnormal antenna, N. sciurinus, 2 ; Florida from S. niger; 30, Antenna, NV. sciurinus, 9 , Texas from S. niger; 31, Same, o'; 32, Antenna, N. semifasciatus, o', Alaska from T. hudsonicus; 33, Same, ?. I have also seen material of this species from Callosciurus notatus, North Borneo: Mount Kinabalu, Tenompak, June 18, 1951, collected by Traub. Dracnosis: N. callosciuri is very similar to N. sciwrt Jancke and N. sciurinus (Mjéberg), differing only in the shape of the basal antennal segment and size of its posteroapical enlarged seta. It is separable from sciurinus in that the enlarged seta on the first antennal segment is not as large in callosciuri (compare figs. 41 and 42). WN. callosciurt is distinct from sciuri in that the apical enlarged seta is borne on a slight prolongation of the basal antennal segment, whereas in sciuri the basal segment is not modified and the enlarged seta is set back from the margin (compare figs. 40 and 42). N. callosciurt differs from both sciuri and sciurinus in having a flattened, rather indistinct (but always present) tubercle on the venter of the basal antennal segment. Description: Male: Head broadly rounded anteriorly; postanten- nal angles marked; posterior head margins only slightly convergent posteriorly. Basal antennal segment produced posteroapically and bearing a stout seta; ventrally basal segment with flattened tubercle; third segment modified, bearing two short, stout setae apically. Thorax broader than long, about as long as head; sternal plate with ANOPLURA OF THAILAND—JOHNSON 583 posterior angles produced into points, plate about as broad as long, its shape varying considerably. Legs typical of genus. Abdomen; ventrally, segment 2 with two plates; segment 3 with well-developed plate associated with anterior row of setae; vestige of a plate asso- ciated with second row of setae; segments 4-6 with one plate, asso- ciated with first of two rows of setae; lateral seta near paratergal plates on each side of segments 3-6. Dorsally, posterior plate of second segment emarginate medially and bearing several stout setae laterally on each side; remaining segments with one plate associated with single row of setae; segments 4-7 with one seta laterally off plate on each side. Paratergal plates with both posterior angles toothed; apical setae varying in length. Genitalia similar to other related species. Female: Head as in male except third antennal segment unmodified. Thorax and legs as in male. Abdomen having two rows of setae on segments 2-6 both dorsally and ventrally; plate associated with anterior row of each segment; posterior row with small areas of sclerotization around each setal base. Paratergal plates as in male. Genitalia not diagnostic. Lengths: Male 1.5-1.7 mm.; female 2.1-2.2 mm. Neohaematopinus cognatus, new species Fiaures 34a, 35d, 39, 44 Neohaematopinus sciurinus, Ferris, Contributions toward a monograph of the sucking lice, pt. 4, p. 245 (in part, records from Menetes berdmoret), 1923.— Hopkins, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, vol. 119, p. 460 (records from M., berdmoret), 1949. Typn pata: Holotype male, allotype female from Menetes berd- more, LOEI: Dan Sai, Kok Sathon, Phu Lom Lo Mt., 8,000 ft., February 22, 1955, RE-4765, R. E. Elbel, collector. Three female paratypes with same data as holotype. A long series of paratypes, all from Menetes berdmoret, as follows: cHatyApHuM: Phukheio, Ban Kaeng, Ban Non Taolek, two females, January 16, 1952, RE-357. Phukheio, Ban Song, January 15, 1953, one female, RE-993. KANCHANABURI: Ban Nua, May 7, 1952, one male, three females, B-721, F-722, F-730. Tamuang City, May 12, 1952, one male, F-741. Kanchanaburi City, June 11, 1952, two females, F-878, F-881. Bo Phloi, March 13, 1952, three males, five females, RE-516. July 16, 1952, one female, Y-308. Purr BuRI: Khao Yoi, Nong Chum Phon, July 14, 1952, four females, F-981. NAKHON SAWAN: Phayuhakhiri, Ban Phayuhadaen, March 6, 1953, five males, five females, RE-1645. Wat Sai (forest), March 29, 1953, two males, one female, RE-1699. Pak Nam Pho, Khao Khat, April 10, 1953, one male, one female, RE-1738. May 7, 1953, five males, five 584 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 o \2097" 212; 213, 215, 218, 224 auritus ariel, 132 auritus auritus, 132 auritus christiei, 132 auritus homochrous, 132 auritus kozlovi, 132 auritus meridionalis, 132 auritus mMordax, 132 auritus puck, 132 auritus sacrimontis, 132 auritus teneriffae, 132 auritus wardi, 132 crassidens, 208, 213, 215 grandis, 208 lecontii, 161 macrotis, 136, 154, 155, 156, 161, 163, 166, 167, 197 macrotis pallescens, 143 maugei, 203 INDEX Plecotus, megalotis mexicanus, 143 mexicanus, 102, 110, 114, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 148, 144 (fig.), 145, 146, 147, 153, 166, 167, 170, 185, 187; 192, 212, 216 (fig.), 219, 226 phyllotis, 98, 107 (fig.), 110, 112, 1135 L149 LS Ges, 121 (fig.), 129, 130, 131, 139, 140, 212, 218, 224 rafinesquii, 110, 114 (fig.), 115 (fig.), 116, 137, 188, 139, 141, 1438, 751, 152, 163, 164, 166, 167, 168, 202, 212, 215, 216 (fig.), 220, 227 rafinesquii macrotis, 152, 161, 164, 220, 227 rafinesquii mexicanus, 141, 143, 185 rafinesquii pallescens, 190 rafinesquii rafinesquii, 152, 162, 168, 220, 227 tetralophodon, 136, 138, 139, 140, 210, 215 townsendii, 103, 107 (fig.), 110, 112, 113, 114 (fig.), 115, 116, 117 (fig.), 118, 120 (fig.), 121 (fig.), 126, 137, 138, 145, 153, ie.) 139, 140, 141, 143, 144 (fig.), 146, 147, 148, 149, 151, 152, 156, 166, 172, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 193, 194, 197, 198, 210, 212, 215, 216 (fig.) townsendii australis, 142, 143, 144 (fig.), 147, 152, 153, 185, 187, 188, 191, 192, 221, 228 townsendii ingens, 153, 186, 187, 188, 189, 191, 202, 221, 228 townsendii “intermedius,’’ 192, 193 townsendi pallescens, 142, 143, 147, 152, 153, 154, 183 (fig.), 184 (fig.), 186, 187, 188, 190, 198, 199, 200, 222, 230 townsendii townsendii, 153, 186, 191, 197, 223, 232 townsendii virginianus, 139, 152, 153, 186, 187, 190, 201, 223, 232 subg., 96, 107, 109, 110, 116, 132, 154, 207 (fig.), 213 Plectiscinae, 398, 474, 475 (fig.), 476 (key), 506 Plectiscus, 476 varius, 474, 475 (fig.) plectrocolum, Apion, 250, 257, 282, 287 g.), 288 pleuralis, Eclytus, 421 Poa sp., 80 podagricus, Triclistus, 481 Podisma, 4, 75 Polistes, 439 Polyblastus, 423, 426 pedalis, 423, 425 (fig.) polychrosidis, Campoplex, 490 Polyeyrtus, 439 semialbus, 440 (fig.), 443 Polyplax, 595, 596, 597 asiatica, 594 cannomydis, 594, 596 (fig.), 598 (fig.) spinulosa, 570, 597, 598 (fig.) 615 Polysphinctini, 395, 399, 400, 405, 406 (fig.), 407 (key) polystachys, Phaseolus, 301 Polyterus, 471 olympiae, 471, 472 (fig.) polytomi, Ischnus, 446 Polytribax, 426 pomorum, Scambus, 401, 404 Tromera, 404 porcatum, Apion, 250, 256, 331, 332, 339 (fig.), 346 praecatorius, Xorides, 415 pretiosus, Brachycyrtus, 425 (fig.), 428 prevosti, Callosciurus, 574 prismaticus, Labrorychus, 503 Pristomerus, 495 austrinus, 495 euryptychiae, 495 pacificus appalachianus, 495 vulnerator, 495 Probolus sp., 451 (fig.) Prochas, 481, 489 theclae, 488 (fig.), 489, 491, 492 proclive, Apion, 250, 258, 274, 281, 282, 287 (fig.), 289 Proechimys, 515, 562 myosuros, 561 Proenderleinellus, 597 calvus, 597, 598 (fig.) Promethus, 478 monticola, 478 propinquicorne, Apion, 250, 255, 274, 276 (fig.), 277 Proscus suspicax, 448 Prosthodocis subg., 420 Protarchus, 397, 465, 468 testatorius, 471 Protichneumon, 456, 458 sp., 456 Protichneumonini, 448, 456, 457 (fig.), 458 (key) pseudacacia, Robinia, 377 Pseudamblyteles, 448, 449, 456 animosus rubellus, 456 nuncias, 454 (fig.), 456 subfuscus, 456 Pseudischnus, 427, 439 oregonensis, 443, 444 (fig.) Psoralea esculenta, 381 physodes, 370 pteronorum, Aptesis, 436 pterophorae, Horogenes, 491 Puccinella sp., 80 puck, Plecotus auritus, 132 pulcherrimus, Phytodietus, (fig.), 420 punctorius, Horogenes, 491, 492 punctulatus, Ephialtes, 405 punctulirostre, Apion, 250, 254, 322, 323 (fig.) 325 purgatus, Enicospilus, 501 pusillus, Sorex, 208 Pyracmon, 481, 489, 491 xanthognatha, 482 (fig.), 490 pyraustae, Campoplex, 490, 491 417, 418 616 pyrrhorhinos, Mus, 519 Wiedomys, 519 PROCEEDINGS quadrisetosus, Trichobius, 173 quebecensis, Dusona, 491 Quercus, 211 rafinesquei, Corynorhinus rafinesquei, 189 rafinesquii, Corynorhinus, 161, 163, 201 Plecotus, 110, 114 (fig.), 115 (fig.), 116, 137, 138, 139, 141, 143, 161, 152, 163, 164, 166, 167, 168, 202, 212, 215, 216 (fig.), 220, 227 Plecotis rafinesquii, 152, 162, 163, 220, 227 rattus, Rattus, 520, 577, 597, 598 Rattus concolor, 594 exulans hawaiiensis, 577 hawaiiensis, 577 norvegicus, 597, 598 rattus, 520, 577, 597, 598 surifer, 569 sp., 570, 575, 597, 598 ratzeburgi, Holocremnus, 491, 492 reclusum, Apion, 249 reconditum, Apion, 249, 250, 256, 348 356 (fig.), 361 regalis, Oryzomys subflavus, 543 Reithrodontomys megalotis, 145 reluctator, Echthrus, 446 retusa, Phaseolus, 304, 305 Revilliodia, 206 rex, Oecomys, 519, 543 Oryzomys, 543 Rhembobius, 427, 436 abdominalis, 436, 438 (fig.) Rhexidermus, 448 huardi, 447 (fig.), 448 Rhinolophidae, 205 Rhinolophus grivensis, 208 Rhipidomys, 518, 522, 526 (fig.) benevolens, 515, 518, 540, 541 dryas, 518, 533 emiliae, 519 klagesi, 546 maculipes, 519 marmosurus, 546 paricola, 518, 535 phaeotis, 518, 540 roberti, 559 rosilla, 518, 535, 538, 539 Rhorus, 465 clapini, 467 (fig.), 468 mesoanthus, 468 Rhypidomys benevolens, 535 Rhyssa, 392 sp, 411, 412 (fig.) Rhyssini, 399, 400, 411, 412 (fig.) rileyi, Xorides, 415, 416 (fig.) roberti, Oecomys, 559 Oryzomys, 518, 559, 560 Oryzomys concolor, 517, 519, 559, 560, 561 Rhipidomys, 559 Robinia pseudacacia (black locust), 377 OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110 rodolphei, Tamiops, 578 Rosa, 474 rosae, Zaleptopygus, 495 rosilla, Oryzomys, 535, 536-537 Rhipidomys, 518, 535, 538, 539 rostrata, Corylus, 50 rostrum, Apion, 249, 251, 257, 307, 308, 378, 379 (fig.), 384 rubellus, Pseudamblyteles animosus, 456 rubicundus, Melanichneumon, 456 rubicus, Pimplopterus, 462 (fig.), 463 rubiginosus, Hyposoter, 491 Rubus, 474 rufescens, Nenetes berdmorei, 574 ruficollis, Ephialtes, 405, 506 ruficoxalis, Lamachus, 471 rufifemur, Campoplex, 490, 492 rufigenis, Dremomys, 592 Enderleinellus, 572 rufinulum, Apion, 346 rufipenne, Apion, 249, 250, 255, 331, 332, 339 (fig.), 346 rufiventrus, Zootrephus, 476, 477 (fig.) rufopectus, Tromatobia, 403 (fig.), 405 rugglesi, Melanoplus, 60, 66 russatus, Hesperomys, 552 rusticus, Ischnoceros, 415 rutilus, Oecomys, 535, 536-537, 539 sacrimontis, Plecotus auritus, 132 sagax, Apion, 350 Salix strobiloides, 280 salodorensis, Myotis, 206 Samonyeteris, 206, 207 (fig.) sancti-albani, Myotis, 206, 208 sancti-felicis, Apion, 250, 253, 309, 316 (figs) 9320 sapellanus, Melanoplus, 4, 75, 76 sayi, Apion, 250, 254, 275, 295, 296, 299 (fig.), 8300, 301, 306 seabriculus, Hybophanes, 417, 421, 422 fi (fig.) Seambus, 394, 401, 404 brevicornis, 404 detritus, 404 foliae, 404 hispae, 402 (fig.), 404 pomorum, 401, 404 scandens, Melanoplus, 4, 69 Melanoplus extremus, 68 Scarabeidae, 496 Searcobatus sp., (greasewood), 80 scelestus, Chasmias, 456 scitulus, Exochus, 479 (fig.), 481 sciuri, Neohaematopinus, 582, 584 (fig.), 585 sciurinus, Haematopinus, 585 Neohaematopinus, 581, 582 (fig.), 583, 584 (fig.), 585, 586, 587 sciuropteri, Neohaematopinus, 587, 588, 589, 590 (fig.), 591 Sciurus, 585 carolinensis, 584, 585, 586, 587 douglasi, 585 niger, 582, 584, 585, 586 vulgaris, 584, 585, 587 INDEX Scolobates, 465 auriculatus, 466, 467 (fig.) Scolobatini, 466, 467 (fig.), 468 Scolomys, 514 Scotomanes ornatus, 109 scriptus, Caloptenus, 4, 14 Melanoplus, 4, 15 scrobicolle, Apion, 384, 385 scutellaris, Diplazon, 476 selectus, Caloptenus, 4, 8, 9 Melanoplus, 4 semialbus, Polyeyrtus, 440 (fig.), 443 semicastaneum, Apion, 346 semifasciatus, Neohaematopinus, 582 (fig.), 584 (fig.), 586 Neohaematopinus antennatus, 585 septentrionalis, Melanoplus, 4, 37 (fig.), 9 Pezotettis, 4, 67 Sequoia, 211 sesiovora, Lampronota, 461 sexannulatus, Cryptus, 426, 446 Short, J. R. T.; A description and clas- sification of the final instar larvae of the Ichneumonidae (Insecta, Hymenoptera), 391 sierranus, Melanoplus, 4, 15 Sigmodon, 577 Sigmodontomys, 514 signatus, Syrphoctonus, 478 simile, Apion, 249, 250, 258, 273, 274, 275, 276 (fig.), 278, 282 simillimus, Hemiteles, 436 Simonycteris, 206, 207 (fig.) simplex, Hesperomys, 519, 520 smithi, Apion, 249 smithii, Mastrus, 429, 435 sodalis, Myotis, 170 Sorex pusillus, 208 speciosus, Oryzomys, 553, 554, 555, 556 Oryzomys concolor, 517, 518, 550, 568 spectator, Apion, 325, 326 Sphecophaga thuringiaca, 438 (fig.), 439 vesparum, 439 sp., 439 Sphecophagini, 427, 428, 439 spicata, Tephrosia, 344 spiculiferum, Apion, 250, 272 Spilogale, 109 spinitarse, Apion, 250, 254, 309, 321 spinulosa, Polyplax, 570, 697, 598 (fig.) spinulosus, Pediculus, 597 splendens, Oecomys, 553, 554, 555, 556 spretis, Acridium, 4, 55 Melanoplus, 4, 55 spretus, Caloptenus, 4, 52 Melanoplus; 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 10, 12, 13 (fig.), 17 (fig.), 18, 19 (fig.), 22, 27 (fig.), 29, 37 (fig.), 52, 54, 56 (fig.), 59 (fig.) Spudastica, 489 kriechbaumeri, 492 Stehlinia, 206, 207 (fig.) stemmator, Xanthopimpla, 409 (fig.), 411 617 Stenapion subg., 248 stenomae, Xiphosomella, 495 stercorator, Iseropus stercorator, 405 Stilpnus, 428, 436 anthomyidiperda, 435 (fig.) stokesi, Gambrus, 44 Streblidae, 173 strenuum, Astiphromma, 458 striatus, Ipoctoninus, 471, 472 (fig.) strobiloides, Salix, 280 Strophostyles helvola, 308 leiosperma, 308 pauciflora, 308 umbellata, 308 sp., 301 stupefactus, Melanoplus, 4 Melanoplus borealis, 3, 4, 8, 31 (fig.), 33 (fig.), 37 (fig.), 49 (fig.), 59 (fig.), 71, 75, 78 Pezotettix, 4, 75 subclavatus, Endasys, 433 (fig.), 485 subflavus, Oryzomys, 518, 519, 524 (fig.), 543 Pipistrellus, 108, 170, 172 subfuscus, Phygadeuon, 434 (fig.), 435 Pseudamblyteles, 456 Pub euEs Oryzomys flavicans, 546, 551, 55 submetallicum, Apion, 250, 258, 326, 327 (fig.), 330 subnudum, Apion, 272 subrufum, Apion, 249, 250, 256, 263, 348, 356 (fig.), 363 subrufus, Amblyteles, 456 subsequens, Apion, 250, 256, 348, 356 (fig.), 364 subtinctum, Apion, 249, 250, 256, 348, 365 subulatus, Myotis, 126, 170 Cryzomys, 546 Vespertilio, 198 superans, Oecomys, 556 Oryzomys, 556, 557, 558, 559 Oryzomys concolor, 517, 519, 531, 550, 666, 558 superba, Glauconycteris, 109 superciliosum, Apion, 278 surifer, Rattus, 569 suspicax, Proscus, 448 suspiciosus, Ichneumon, 456 suzukii, Nippocryptus, 4438 (fig.) Symphyta, 439 Synomelix, 471 sp., 471, 472 (fig.) Synotus, 105, 164 lecontii, 161 macrotis, 161, 164, 190 maugei, 203 townsendi, 190 townsendii, 197 syrphicola, Ethelurgus, 431 (fig.), 435 Syrphidae, 476 Syrphoctonus, 478 agilis, 476 maculifrons, 476, 477 (fig.) signatus, 478 618 Syrphoctonus tarsatorius, 478 Syzeuctus aculatmorius, 463 tabogense, Apion, 247, 250, 273 tacherdi, Callosciurus finlaysoni, 580 Tadarida brasiliensis, 172 mexicana, 170 Tamiasciurus, 165, 584, 586 douglasi, 585, 586 hudsonicus, 586 sp., 585 Tamiops hudsonicus, 582 macclellandi, 570, 571, 577, rodolphei, 578 sp., 578, 580 tantillus, Gelis, 429, 433 (fig.), 485 tapajinus, Oecomys, 546, 547, 548-549, 554 578 tarsatorius, Syrphoctonus, 478 tarsilas, Mesoleius, 468 taylori, Petaurista, 594 tectus, Oryzomys, 515, 518, 546, 547, 548-549, 551 Oryzomys tectus, 546 tenebricosum, Apion, 275 tenellus, Gelis, 486 teneriffae, Plecotus auritus, 132 (map) Tenthredinidae, 421, 423, 426, 481 ashes tea Mesoleius, 468, ‘469 (fig.), Teniiecinipiiees 465, 468 tenuirostrum, Apion, 249 tenuiventris, ‘Casinaria, 491 Tephrosia spicata, 344 terebrator, Dusona, 491 Tersilochini, 398, 495, 496 (fig.) Tersilochus argentinensis, 496 (fig.) conotracheli, 496 sp., 496 testatorius, Protarchus, 471 tetragonus, Diplazon, 478 tetralophodon, Corynorhinus, 140, 2/0 Pipeobue 136, 138, 139, 140, 210, 15 texana, Oxyrrhexis carbonator, 406 (fig.), 407 texanum, Eiphosoma, 495 thaiwanensis, Callosclurus erythraeus, 57 Thaumatotypus, 429 paradoxus, 432 (fig.), 435 Thecla empusa, 489 theclae, Prochas, 488 (fig.), 489, 491, 492 Therion, 504 circumflexum, 500 (fig.), 504 morio, 504 Therionini, 500 (fig.), 502, 504 (key) Theronia, 413 atalantae, 413, 414 (fig.) Theroniini, 399, 400, 401, 413, 414 (fig.) thoracicus, Euceros, 467 (fig.), 468 thuringiaca, Sphecophaga, 438 (fig.), 439 thurmanae, Hoplopleura, 577, 578 (fig.), 580 (fig.) Thymaridini, 420, 421 (key), 422 (fig.) Thyreodon atricolor, 501 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL, 110 thyridopteryx, Phobetes, 432 (fig.), 435 thysanodes, Myotis, 108, 169, 170 Thysiotorus, 429 sp., 434 (fig.), 435 tibialis, Charopsimorpha, 491 tinctoria, Baptisia, 386 tityri, Ophion, 501 tosensis, Campoplex, 490, 491 townsendi, Corynorhinus, 190, 197 Synotus, 190 | townsendii, Corynorhinus macrotis, 197 | Corynorhinus megalotis, 197 Corynorhinus rafinesquii, 197 Corynorhinus townsendii, 197 Plecotus, 103, 107 (fig.), 110, 112, 1138, i14 (fig op aa a 116, 117 (fig.), 118, 120 (fig.), 121 (fig.), 126, 137, 188, 139, 140, 141, 143, 144, (fig.), 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 151, 152, 153, 156, 16, 172, 185, 187, 188, 189, 190, 193, 194, 197, 198, 210, 212, 215, 216 (fig.) Plecotus townsendii, 153, 186, 191, 197, 223, 232 Synotus, 197 | trabeatus, Oecomys, 533 | Oryzomys bicolor, 516, 518, 532, 533, 534 Trichapion subg., 247, 248, 249, 251, | 252 (key), 260, 347 | Trichobius corynorhini, 173 quadrisetosus, 173 Trichomma enecator, 504 occisor, 506 clues Oryzomys, 546, 548-549, 551, 55 Triclistus, 398, 478, 480 curvator, 479 (fig.), 480 podagricus, 481 tricolor, Exenterus, 426 Hyposoter, 492 tricoloripes, Campoplex, 490 Trigonophymus mexicanus, 10 ee ee 547, 553, 554, 555, 55 triste, Apion, 279 tristis, Biolysia, 484 (fig.), 491 Trogini, 446, 457 (fig.), 448 troglodytes, Apion, 249 Trogus, 458 pennator, 457 (fig.), 458 Tromatobia, 401, 405 rufopectus, 403 (fig.), 405 zonata, 405 Tromera pomorum, 404 Trychosis, 427, 439 sp., 441 (fig.), 443 Trypanosoma vespertilionis, 174 Tryphoninae, 397, 417, 418 (fig.), 419 (key), aie 422 (fig.), 423, 425 (fig.), 504, 506 Seles 120, 428, 425 (fig.), 426 ey tsugae, Lamachus, 471 tuberosa, Apios, 343 turbulentum, Apion, 361, 362 INDEX 619 turionellae, Pimpla, 410 vulgaris, Sciurus, 584, 585, 587 typicalis, Melanoplus, 4 vulnerator, Pristomerus, 495 Melanoplus, devastator, 42, 43 vulturnus, Melanoplus bilituratus, 4, 7, 12, 13 dig.) 5: 14547 Ag.) .e9 Ulmus, 211 (fig.), 25, 27 (fig.), 29, 31 (fig.), umbellata, Strophostyles, 308 33 (fig.), 37 (fig.), 56 (fig.), 65 unicincta, Charopsimorpha, 488 (fig.), 491 walsheai, Phaeogenes walshiae, 448 __ Phobocampe, 492 walshii, Apion, 279, 280 unifasciatorius, Cratichneumon, 456 wardi, Plecotus auritus, 132 uniformis, Melanoplus, 4, 41, 43 waterhousii. Macrotus, 205 utahensis, Melanoplus, 52, 81, 83 Wiedomys pyrrhorhinus, 519 Melanoplus borealis, 4, 8, 31 (fig.), | Wvyethi lexicaulis. 52 jean ie 49" (ies 50 (fig.), 78, 79, 81 xanthaeolus, Cryzomys, 543 validus, Campoplex, 482 (fig.), 490, 492 | *@2thocampoplex, 490 Aer nigromaculatus, 482 (fig.), 490 variabilis, Dusona, 491 sp., 490 aa ee Calliephialtes, 402 (fig.), 404, xanthognatha, Pyracmon, 482 (fig.), 490 varipes, Zaglyptus varipes, 405 mone pple, 308/207 )410 varius, Plectiscus, 474, 475 (fig.) rede ae velifer, Myotis, 120 (fig.), 170, 172, 174 enderleinie4ti velox, Aoplus, 456 pedator 411 Veronia interior, 369 stemmator, 409 (fig.), 411 verrucosa, Betula, 280 vs ? Xiphosomella, 495 vesparum, Sphecophaga, 439 skenoniac. 495 Vespertilio, 105, 132, 207 (fig.), 208 Z auritus, 127, 132 Xorides, 295, 415, 502 grivensis, 208 Ue ae j irrigator eee praecatorius, 415 maugei, 203 ees megalotis, 154, 155, 156, 168 Bar aa subulatus, 198 Apes Xoridescopus, 415 Vespertilionidae, 104, 106, 206 1s Vespertilioninae, 104, 106 Sr ae ates vespertilionis, Trypanosoma, 174 Monin 399, 400, 401 415 416 (fig.) Vespula, 439 428 507. : : ie vicencianus, Oryzomys, 546, 547, 548- 549, 550, 553 Xyela, 421 vicinum, Apion, 279 vincibilis, Phaeogenes, 448 yumanensis, Myotis, 108, 169, 170 vinosum, Apion, 249, 250, 258, 291, 294 vinulae, Netelia, 420 Zaglyptus, 405 virescens, Pedies, 9 varipes varipes, 405 virgatus, Melanoplus, 4, 42, 43 Zaleptopygus, 495 virginianus, Corynorhinus townsendii, flavo-orbitalis, 495 201 gallaecola, 495 Lamachus, 470 (fig.), 471 rosae, 495 Plecotus, townsendii, 139, 152, 153, sp., 495 186, 187, 190, 201, 223, 232 Zatypota, 407 vitticollis, Dusona vitticollis, 485 (fig.), sp., 406 (fig.), 407 491 zonata, Tromatobia, 405 Mesochorus, 459 Zootrephus, 478 volans, Myotis, 169, 170 Zootrephus rufiventrus, 476, 477 (fig.) O - = C4 Mahl quirk: dal faa \ apiquasdat | Heres TOS ae gaia H t + ° Fi ! | \ | \ j : j oe ual ‘ 2 it Wale ri ie a Pi bo fetes Oey ; b Ut: { ‘ et se Whee gh :. me UTX GOL aitog. 7 —— YY 7 ¥ id _ oi) yt 7 7 : 7 : x ; ie : De ae tia iy "a a + 4 j eu : + ie : : 7 ry 7 - oJ , , : Y fl a . i a. - ‘ ‘ ; ; 5 a . 7 7 _ 5 a 7 ‘ a i = ’ y e io Y # + 7 ‘ = a 7 7 ; 7 7 7 7 7 A. oe / . SS _ ‘ : - ; i _ ~~ . 7 no a j : a a ‘ : ’ rs 7 " iy I : : (f) 7 : _ ‘ ’ 7 . y - 7 ' i : > i.) an : i : oo oF 7 "2 7 . ap i) Ww yy iy A a 7 7 : i 7 7 : : a ” i : = i ' vd - . La Vt } a) i a 7 7 i Ae 7 7 : ’ : ——, ah. i : ae : 7 i i _ : ah 1 i - co : : ; i Dai : : ‘ : - o 7 : ‘ on - i - 4) Onn _ : : 7 . v a it - = =o: = — - io a , 7 7 7 en ie ' ‘ s 7 : : 7 , . i = ¥ , ‘ J - n 1 7 _ ' 7 a ; / 7 aut oe 7 » se 7 > WK, . a a , 7 > ot i , i= 7 7 ; 2 oT] a i - - 4 D 7 ie : ; 7 = - Ji on ‘ - “6 : ii 7 Ua 7 - i} 7 - 2 , ] ‘ i! % ce 7 7 ' - : — ‘awn ; 7 v - i 7 = (a “w-ante es ae 2 Ole ri ay on A 7 * 7 g ‘ i‘ 7 feo : ; — : j 7 (ae 7, eae i P 1" = - ste =.'. ; - al. _ 7 ie a - a ® = : - Ls Ape! 7 : i) : : a 7 *, Toe cu as _ 7 r sere 7 7 a _ a : 7 a i nl lp oi 7 a ’ if : a - : : ? : - 7 irl ae . - 7 7 : i ; 7) a f ' a an o 7 St 1 i n ad An - : : ; Py ' oe ro & . - ? > , = ~ e : 7. a a : - ) ry a ; 5 = 7 + = - y , ae 1 : - - ae f fl i 7 om oa 1 : wi sone au 1 - yon -. _ _ 4 a ae = oo, * Ae Ay ey Py f) ey _ * ary ye aa ae f iy 7 i . a a 5 Li ‘ are | "a Ti 8 01420 9928 wii } |