ee
a, UN,
har iN)
5 ,
Prot
if - Ys
x
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM
PROCEEDINGS
OF THE
UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM
VOLUME 110
NUMBERS 3416-3421
UNITED STATES
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
WASHINGTON : 1960
Publications of the United States National Museum
The scientific publications of the United States National Museum include two
series, Proceedings of the United States National Museum and United States National
Museum Bulletin.
In these series are published original articles and monographs dealing with the
collections and work of the Museum and setting forth newly acquired facts in the
fields of anthropology, biology, geology, history, and technology. Copies of
each publication are distributed to libraries and scientific organizations and to
specialists and others interested in the various subjects.
The Proceedings, begun in 1878, are intended for the publication, in separate
form, of shorter papers. These are gathered in volumes, octavo in size, with the
publication date of each paper recorded in the table of contents of the volume.
In the Bulletin series, the first of which was issued in 1875, appear longer, sep-
arate publications consisting of monographs (occasionally in several parts) and
volumes in which are collected works on related subjects. Bulletins are either
octavo or quarto in size, depending on the needs of the presentation. Since 1902
papers relating to the botanical collections of the Museum have been published
in the Bulletin series under the heading Contributions from the United States
National Herbarium.
REMINGTON KELLOGG,
Director, United States National Museum.
CONTENTS
Gurney, AsHuury B., and Brooks, A. R. Grasshoppers of
the mexicanus group, genus Melanoplus (Orthoptera:
Acrididae). Eighteen figures and five plates. No. 3416,
published July 9, 1959
New subspecies: Melanoplus bilituratus vulturnus.
Hanbury, Cuaruss O., Jr. A revision of American bats of
the genera Huderma and Plecotus. Twenty-seven figures.
No. 3417, published September 3, 1959 Mest:
Hersekovirz, Pum. Mammals of Northern Colombia,
preliminary report No. 8: Arboreal rice rats, a systematic
revision of the subgenus Oecomys, genus Oryzomys.
Six figures and twelve plates. No. 3420, published
February 24, 1960
New subspecies: Oryzomys concolor bahiensis.
Jounson, Puynurs T. The rodent-infesting Anoplura
(sucking lice) of Thailand, with remarks on some related
species. Seventy-five figures. No. 3421, published
November 10, 1959 . pee
New species: Enderleinellus corrugatus, Hoplopleura thurmanae,
Neohaematopinus callosciuri, N. cognatus, N. capitaneus, N.
kinabalensis, N. elbeli, Polyplax cannomydis.
Kissinger, Davip G. A revision of the Apion subgenus
Trichapion Wagner in the New World (Coleoptera:
Curculionidae). Nineteen figures. No. 3418, published
October 23, 1959 .
New species: Apion (Trichapion) bettyae, A. (T.) acanonicum,
A. (T.) adaetum, A. (T.) coryi, A. (T.) plectrocolum, A. (T.)
ortotes, A. (T.) parcum, A. (T.) eaenum, A. (T.) enoplus, A. (T.)
innocens, A. (T.) innocuum, A. (T.) latitator, A. (T.) mirandum,
A. (T.) mirificum, A. (T.) evustum, A. (T.) nanulum, A. (T.)
subsequens.
SHort, J. R. T. A description and classification of the final
instar Jarvae of the Ichneumonidae (Insecta, Hymenop-
tera). Sixty-four figures. No. 3419, published October
743) %el 215) a
Pages
1-93
95-246
513-568
569-598
247-389
391-511
Tir
whi fy
Afb otis!
’
a”
by) PRR
PROCEEDINGS OF THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM
Vol. 110 Washington : 1959 No. 3416
GRASSHOPPERS OF THE MEXICANUS GROUP,
GENUS MELANOPLUS (ORTHOPTERA: ACRIDIDAE)
By Asauey B. Gurney! and A. R. Brooxs?
INTRODUCTION
Since the historic outbreaks of the Rocky Mountain grasshopper
(Melanoplus spretus (Walsh)) in the 1870’s, the close relatives of that
species, especially the one recently called MZ. mexicanus (Saussure),
have been of great economic importance in the United States and
Canada. The present study was undertaken to clarify the status of
the various taxonomic entities in this complex, and we hope it will
stimulate further clarifying studies. We have also attempted to
summarize briefly the more important information on the biology of
each species.
For many years the status of spretus has been a puzzle to ento-
mologists because no specimens have been collected since the early
1900’s. Gradually the opinion developed that spretus disappeared
because it was the migratory phase of a normally solitary grasshopper,
and it was supposed that mezicanus was that species. Our study of
1 Entomology Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture.
2 Entomology Section, Canada Department of Agriculture Research Laboratory, Saskatoon, Saskatche-
wan, Canada.
1
477119—59——_1
2 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
the aedeagus indicates that spretus is a distinct species. Any further
evidence bearing on this opinion naturally is very desirable.
It is chiefly on the basis of the differences in the aedeagus that
mexicanus has been found to be distinct from the species commonly
misidentified as M. mexicanus by American entomologists. The
species most frequently misidentified as mezicanus is M. bilituratus
(Walker), and the structure of the aedeagus further suggests that
three subspecies merit recognition.
Limits oF Group
The mexicanus group consists of Melanoplus mezicanus and five
closely related species. There are five subspecies in addition to the
typical ones. Distribution is limited to North America, from southern
Mexico to the Arctic. At this stage in our knowledge of the species
groups of Melanoplus, the best that can be offered as a definition of
the mexicanus group is a somewhat loose combination of the following
characters:
1. Pronotum with hind margin of the dorsal surface produced posteriorly,
either broadly angulate or rounded (fig. 15).
2. Tegmina usually covering most or all of abdomen, often extending beyond
it, sometimes covering only about a third of the abdomen (pl. 5), but always
elongate, never lobate.
3. Male cercus (figs. 7, 8) varying from slender and somewhat rectangular to
broadly and irregularly oval.
4, Male subgenital plate tending to develop a dorsal lip at the apex, sometimes
posteriorly produced, frequently with twin apical knobs (figs. 11, 16).
5. Dorsal valve of aedeagus anterior to the apical portion of the main stem,
usually well sclerotized, more or less concave laterally (figs. 1, 2, 3). Ventral
valve of aedeagus relatively short, straplike, its apex usually visible in lateral
view near the base of the dorsal valve, dorsad of the accessory lobe. Accessory
lobe of aedeagus moderate to large, weakly sclerotized.
The name of the mezicanus group is taken from the specific name
that has been used most often in the literature in recent years, though,
as now restricted, mexicanus is neither the most widely distributed
nor the most important species. MM. bilituratus is the most widely
distributed, and since the outbreak of spretus ended it has been the
most important. Hebard (1935a, p. 57) recognized a borealis group;
earlier (1928) he briefly discussed some members of the mexicanus
group as he conceived it. It seems to us that the mezicanus group is
sufficiently cohesive to be recognized as we are treating it, with
borealis included, at least until the group relationships within Melano-
plus are better understood. M. femur-rubrum (De Geer), genotype
of Melanoplus, has not been included in this group, though the male
cercus is very much like that of borealis borealis. The subgenital
plate of femur-rubrum is not produced apically as in the members of
this group. A distinctive character of femur-rubrum is a small
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 3
spinelike structure (x of fig. 1,2) borne near the base of the accessory
lobe of the aedeagus; it does not seem homologous with the lateral
projection from the dorsal valve in mezicanus.
TABLE 1.—Checklist and index to specific and infraspecific names in the mexicanus
group of Melanoplus
(Page numbers refer to the present work; synonyms are shown in italics)
Name Author and year Original genus Present status
affinis (p. 14) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Syn. of bilituratus
(Proposed bilituratus
as distinct
species.)
affinis (p. 42) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Syn. of devastator
(Proposed as
form of M.
devastator.)
alaskanus (p. 45) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Syn. of bruneri
angelicus (p. 14) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Syn. of bilituratus
bilituratus
arcticus (p. 14) Walker, 1870 Caloptenus Syn. of bilituratus
bilituratus
ater (p. 41) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Syn. of devastator
atlanis (p. 14) Riley, 1875 Caloptenus Syn. of bilituratus
bilituratus
bilituratus (p. 12) Walker, 1870 Caloptenus Valid species
borealis (p. 67) Fieber, 1853 Caloptenus Valid species
bruneri (p. 45) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Valid species
caeruleipes (p. 52) Cockerell, 1889 Caloptenus Syn. of spretus
coeruleipes (p. 14)
(Proposed as
var. of spretus.)
Cockerell, 1888
(Proposed as
var. of atlanis.)
Melanoplus
Syn. of bilituratus bilitu-
ratus
cockerelli (p. 75) Scudder, 1900 Melanoplus Syn. of borealis stupe-
factus
consanguineus Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Syn. of devastator
(p. 41)
conspicuus (p. 42) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Syn. of devastator
(Proposed as
form of
devastator.)
defectus (p. 38) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Valid subspecies of
bilituratus
devastator (p. 41) Scudder, 1878 Melanoplus Valid species
diminutus (p. 41) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Syn. of devastator
dimidipennis Bruner, 1904 Melanoplus Syn. of bilituratus
(p. 15)
excelsus (p. 45) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Syn. of bruneri
extremus (p. 67) Walker, 1870 Caloptenus Syn. of borealis borealis
intermedius (p. 14) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Syn. of bilituratus bilitu-
ratus
junius (p. 68) Dodge, 1876 Pezotettix Syn. of borealis borealis
latifercula (p.75) Caudell, 1903 Melanoplus Syn. of borealis stupe-
factus
mexicanus (p. 8) Saussure, 1861 Pezotettix Valid species
4. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM
VOL. 110
TaBLE 1—Checklist and index to specific and infraspecific names in the mexicanus
group of Melanoplus—Continued
Name Author and year Original genus Present status
monticola (p. 68) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Syn. of borealis borealis
obscurus (p. 42) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Syn. of devastator
(Proposed as
form of
devastator.)
palaceus (p. 78) Fulton, 1930 Melanoplus Valid subspecies of bore-
alis
parvus (p. 68) Provancher, Caloptenus Syn. of borealis borealis
1876
sapellanus (p. 75) Scudder, 1900 Melanoplus Syn. of borealis stupe-
factus
scandens (p. 68) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Syn. of borealis borealis
scriptus (p. 14) Walker, 1870 Caloptenus Syn. of bilituratus
bilituratus
selectus (p. 8) Walker, 1870 Caloptenus Syn. of mexicanus
septenirionalis Saussure, 1861 Pezotettix Syn. of borealis borealis
(p. 67)
sterranus (p. 15) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Syn. of bilituratus
bilituratus
spretis (p. 55) Thomas, 1865 Acridium Unrecognizable; see p. 55
spretus (p. 52) Walsh, 1866 Caloptenus Valid species
stupefactus (p. 75) Scudder, 1876 Pezotettix Valid subspecies of bore-
alis
typicalis (p. 42) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Syn. of devastator
(Proposed as
form of
devastator.)
uniformis (p. 41) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Syn. of devastator
utahensis (p. 81) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Valid subspecies of bore-
alis
virgatus (p. 42) Scudder, 1897 Melanoplus Syn. of devastator
vulturnus (p. 25)
New subspecies of bili-
turatus
The species here treated in the mezxicanus group were distributed by
Scudder (1897b) in five different “series” of Melanoplus, and M.
borealis stupefactus (Scudder) was in the genus Podisma.
Those
“series” of Scudder are not comparable to the groups of Hebard and
other modern workers.
ANATOMY OF THE Mare GENITALIA
Since the appearance of Hubbell’s (1932) important study, the
concealed male genitalia of Acrididae have been utilized for distin-
guishing species and subspecies to a considerable extent. Roberts
(1941) coordinated the terms for the structures useful to taxonomists
with those studied by morphologists, and proposed several new
single-word terms. Dirsh (1956) carried the study further, comparing
nearly 800 genera and modifying previous terminology by several
changes and a number of new terms.
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 5
The male genital mass or assemblage, preferably known as the
phallic complex, including the aedeagus and its supporting apodemes,
as well as the epiphallus—located anterior to the aedeagus (fig. 2,b)—
is situated at the end of the abdomen beneath the supra-anal plate
and the pallium (membranous covering usually dorsad of the sub-
genital plate). Taxonomically, the aedeagus and epiphallus are the
most important organs of the phallic complex, and the critical parts
of each are illustrated by M. femur-rubrum (fig. 1,h,%).
MetTHODS AND TECHNICS
A brief outline of the technic employed in examining the male
phallic complex may be helpful.
With freshly collected specimens it is a simple matter to slip back
the pallium with a dissecting needle, thus exposing the aedeagus.
The attaching muscles are easily disrupted sufficiently to permit the
phallic complex to be lifted and pulled posteriorly. It is then exposed,
attached to the subgenital plate, and is readily visible in the pinned
specimen. However, for the most detailed study, removal of the
phallic complex and its examination in alcohol are recommended.
It may be preserved in a micro-vial, partly filled with glycerine, set at
an angle beneath the grasshopper, with the pin passing through the
cork of the micro-vial. The dry preparations still attached to
specimens are adequate for sorting and for moderately critical study.
In the case of dry grasshoppers, sufficient relaxation to permit expo-
sure or removal of the phallic complex may be effected either by
placing the specimens in a moist relaxing chamber for one or two days,
or by dipping the end of the abdomen for a minute or two in water
that is coming to a boil. Although very quick, the latter method
frequently destroys the natural colors of the hind legs and results in
crumpled tegminal apices; so the relaxing chamber is recommended if
the future appearance of specimens is important.
Because of the difficulty of identifying females to species in some
cases, our maps and distribution records, except as noted, are based on
males. ‘This practice has eliminated many uncertainties which other-
wise would have entered into the distribution plotting for subspecies
and for species of similar appearance which occupy the same areas.
Lists of localities from which specimens have been examined, or full
data on specimens, have been given only where they appear to be of
considerable value. Localities are listed roughly in the order that they
appear on the map, taken in rows from north to south, beginning in
the east. For two or more localities very close together, only one spot
is shown on the map. ‘The intensive field work of the junior author in
Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and Alberta would, for some species, have
permitted the inclusion of an almost solid mass of dots on the map,
6 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
so in those cases only limital and representative localities are shown.
Tegmen (front wing or elytron) length is subject to inconsistencies
unless a standard measurement is taken. Thus, it is measured “from
the distal extremity of the tubercle formed by the junction of the
subcostal and radial veins” (Proc. 4th Internat. Locust Conference,
Cairo, p. 97, 1937) (also see Dirsh, 1953, for a treatment of standard
measurements). We have tried to select specimens with tegminal
apices intact, thus avoiding difficulties encountered when the tip of
the tegmen is frayed (see Ramchandra Rao, Bull. Ent. Res., vol. 33,
pp. 247-249, 1942).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Most of the type specimens are located in the Museum of Compara-
tive Zoology (MCZ), the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia
(ANSP), and in the U. S. National Museum (USNM). We are much
indebted to J. A. G. Rehn (of ANSP) and P. J. Darlington (of MCZ)
for the privilege of studying the historical material in their charge,
as well as for loans of important series from those collections. The
courtesies extended by Mr. Rehn and by his colleague, Harold J.
Grant, Jr., on several visits to Philadelphia by the senior author, are
much appreciated. It has been especially helpful to examine many
of the specimens preserved there which were studied by the late
Morgan Hebard. To the following curators we would acknowledge
deep appreciation for the loan of critical types or information about
them: Max Beier (Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna); N. M.
Comeau (Musée de la Province, Quebec); Charles Ferriere (Museum
d’Histoire Naturelle, Geneva) ; and David R. Ragge (British Museum).
Other entomologists to whom we are very grateful for important loans
are: T. H. Hubbell (University of Michigan); George P. Holland
(Canadian National Collection, Ottawa); E. S. Thomas (Ohio State
Museum); Henry Dietrich (Cornell University); S. W. Frost (Penn-
sylvania State University); John R. Hilliard (University of Texas) ;
F. W. Werner (University of Arizona); Edwin W. King (Clemson
Agricultural College); R. E. Pfadt (University of Wyoming); George
E. Wallace (Carnegie Museum); Paul D. Hurd (University of Cali-
fornia); Neely Turner (Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Sta-
tion); H. V. Weems (Florida Plant Board); B. B. Pepper (Rutgers
University); R. D. Bird (Dominion Entomological Laboratory,
Brandon, Manitoba); Frank T. Cowan, J. R. Parker and Fred Skoog
(U. S. Department of Agriculture, Bozeman, Mont.); O. L. Barnes
(U. S. Department of Agriculture, Tempe, Ariz.).
Several other entomologists have cooperated in supplying informa-
tion or other help, and acknowledgment of their assistance appears
in our discussion of the various species.
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 7
Figures 1,a,d,e; 2 (all except f); 9,f,9,k-2; and 15 were made by
Arthur D. Cushman, Entomology Research Division, U. 8. Depart-
ment of Agriculture. All other drawings and the maps were made by
the senior author.
Systematic Treatment
Key to species and subspecies of the mexicanus group of Melanoplus
(Based on males)
1. A distinct mesosternal swelling or ““hump”’ present (fig. 1,d,f,g). . .- . . 2
Without a mesosternal “hump,” or with a weakly developed one (fig. 1,e). 7
2. Dorsal valve of aedeagus (fig. 3,k) of a general circular shape, appearing thin
and parchment-like, and with a triangular projection (x of fig. 3,k) on the
dorsal rim; subgenital plate usually without twin apices well developed
(fig. 11,a-1,2,4,5), occasionally with them distinct (fig. 11,a-3). (Distri-
butions figs: 125,015), \spterisbnedens ie esterase . . bruneri Scudder
Dorsal valve variously formed (fig. 3,a—-h) but not wath a generally circular
shape as in fig. 3,k; subgenital plate normally with well-developed twin
apices (fig. 9,f,h-2), best seen in posterior view (fig. 10,uw-z). . .... 3
3. Dorsal valve of aedeagus strongly recurved laterally and posteriorly (fig. 3,a),
the hornlike structure heavily sclerotized (pl. 2,p). (Distribution: fig. 14).
spretus (Walsh)
Dorsal valve (fig. 3,b-f) variously shaped, but not as in opposite category. 4
4. Dorsal valve of aedeagus with a lateral projection (p) from its ventrobasal
region (fig. 3,b-1, lateral view; fig. 3,b-2, lateroventral view). (Distribution:
figs. 4, 6) . SpE SIe Certo tein tin ute. cis Nenie me mexicanus (Saussure)
Dorsal valve without a Tavera projection from its ventrobasal region. . 5
5. Dorsal valve of aedeagus (fig. 3,c) typically produced into a blunt hook or
knob at lateroanterior angle (y), especially by a carina (x) which separates
main lateral surface from a concave, heavily sclerotized ventroanterior
marginal area (z). (Distribution: fig. 6).
bilituratus vulturnus, new subspecies
Dorsal valve (fig. 3,d-f) without a hook or knob at lateroanterior angle, and
without a carina on main lateral surface, though the ventroanterior margin
usually recurves as a lip (z of fig. 3,d) . THREE EAR toed tte CS OE + oti 6
6. Dorsal valve of aedeagus appearing inflated, ‘igpiealln ith a concave anterior
margin (x of fig. 3,d) and with a sinuate margin (z) of the recurved anterior
flap (y), the latter wide. (Distribution: fig. 6).
bilituratus defectus Scudder
Dorsal valve with little appearance of inflation, without a concave anterior
margin, and with a relatively straight margin of the recurved anterior flap,
the latter of variable width, often narrow (fig. 3,e). (Distribution: figs.
bays: (a) att Ree Caen Ces eae RERUN [rae SR bilituratus bilituratus (Walker)
7. Cercus (fig.7,h) narrow; subgenital plate usually with twin apices (fig. 9,4-2),
though variable and occasionally poorly developed (fig. 10,7); aede-
agus with apex produced dorsally beyond the base of dorsal valve (figs.
2,k; 3,2); dorsal valve extending primarily dorsoanteriorly. (Distribution:
GG TA) po rsd as, (gnats fb bordel yeudartectay ony: «Xb. set devastater'Scudder
8 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Cercus (figs. 7,7; 8,a—e) usually less slender than above; subgenital plate most
often without twin apices (fig. 11, b-f); apex of aedeagus scarcely extending
dorsally beyond base of dorsal valve (fig. 3,7); dorsal valve extending
primarily anteriorly, with a lateral twist. (Distribution: figs. 17,18). . 8
8. Tegmina covering about one-half of abdomen (pl. 5,8,F). (Occurs at very
high altitudes; distribution: fig. 18). . . borealis stupefactus (Scudder)
Tegmina covering more than one-half & abdomen. ... «ae? Sale
9. Subgenital plate with scarcely any or comparatively little oral or posterior
development of the apex (fig. 16,d). (Distribution: figs. 17, 18).
borealis borealis (Fieber)
Subgenital plate with considerable dorsal or posterior development of the
apex (fig. 16,e-g) . . . 3 2 LO
10. Subgenital plate (fig. 16,f; ah 4 nie nee feenanienonels protaced poste-
riorly. (Distribution: fig. 18) . . . . borealis utahensis Scudder
Subgenital plate (fig. 16,e) erodnced! Honeeiie more than posteriorly. (Ab-
domen often conspicuously recurved as in pl. 4,p.) (Distribution: fig. 18.)
borealis palaceus Fulton
Melaneplus mexicanus (Saussure)
Ficursxs 2,c; 3,b; 4; 6; 7,a; 10,f,q; PuaTe 1,
Pezotetitiz mexicana Saussure, Rev. Mag. Zool., ser. 2, vol. 13, p. 160, 1861 (male,
female, Temperate Mexico). Lectotype, here designated: Male labeled
“Cordova, t. c.’’? (printed), a separate green label ‘‘Melanoplus mexicanus
Sauss.”’ (apparently in Saussure’s longhand). (Museum d’Histoire Naturelle,
Geneva, Switzerland.)
Caloptenus selectus Walker, Catalogue of the specimens of Dermaptera Saltatoria
in the collection of the British Museum, pt. 4, p. 682, 1879 (female, Oajaca
(sic), Mexico). Lectotype, one of two females, selected by Uvarov (1925, p.
298).
The condition of the lectotype of mezicanus is good, with all ap-
pendages except antennae, right middle leg, and left hind tibia present.
It is not an alcoholic specimen, and color is well preserved. Dark
dorsal bands on hind femora are well developed, also the pale area of
the lower third of the outer paginal area and the pink ventral surface.
The hind tibia is deep pink. The aedeagus (dry on specimen) is typical
of the species as shown by the series examined. ‘The cercus is some-
what less robust than the one from Bledos, Mexico, illustrated (fig.
7,a-1). The mesosternal hump is well developed.
Charles Ferriere, curator of entomology at the Museum of Natural
History in Geneva, has located 16 specimens (6 males, 10 females) of
the original series of mezicanus. He kindly loaned 8 specimens, all
bearing green name labels like that above. One female has the same
locality label as the lectotype. Two females bear ‘Orizaba, Sumi-
chrast,’”’ and one female ‘‘Orizaba, M. H. de Saussure.’’ Two males
without locality labels and one female “‘Orizaba, reg. temp. Sumi-
chrast”’ prove to be M. femur-rubrum (De Geer), showing that the
original series was a mixed one.
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 9
It is probable that the green labels are not original ones, but later
ones written by Saussure, since the generic name Pezotettiz is not
used. The history of Saussure’s travels suggests that the specimens
seen are part of the original series studied by Saussure. Burr’s
obituary of Saussure (Ent. Record, vol. 17, pp. 167-170, 1905) records
Saussure’s visit to the New World, and mentions an article published
by him about the volcano of Orizaba in 1858. This volcano is adja-
cent to Cérdoba (spelling now usually followed). Saussure (1870,
p. 2) referred to Fr. Sumichrast (one of the collectors of mezicanus
types) as his old aide and travel companion. The abbreviation “‘t. ¢.”’
is Spanish for “tierra caliente” (warm region), as indicated by Hebard
(1932a, p. 281). However, the specimens may have been taken
under temperate conditions, as Cérdoba, about 50 to 60 miles west
of Veracruz, in the State of Veracruz, is at the base of Mount Orizaba.
The wide variety of zonal conditions encountered when one descends
from Mount Orizaba to Cérdoba is mentioned by Goldman (1951,
p. 279). Also, Sumichrast, and apparently Saussure too, collected
extensively at nearby Mirador (see Goldman, p. 276), and, depend-
ing on the detail with which specimens were labeled, some of the
original mezxicanus series may have originated there. Five males
taken at La Cumbre, near Cérdoba, at an elevation of 6,000 feet,
by Dr. H. R. Roberts in 1936, agree perfectly with the lectotype.
Uvarov (1925, p. 298) placed selectus in synonymy. A male from
Ocotlén, Oaxaca, which is near the type locality of selectus, has been
examined by us and is considered typical of mezicanus.
Two specimens, male and female (ANSP), from ‘littoral du Mexi-
que,’ labeled as ‘‘Platyph. mezicanus Sauss.,’”’ apparently by Saussure,
and as paratypes of Platyphymus mexicana Saussure by Hebard, are
really Melanoplus mezxicanus. The incorrect name labels may have
been prepared accidentally by Saussure; at any rate Platyphyma
mexicanum, described by Brunner in 1861, is a very different insect
with short elliptical tegmina. Hebard (1932a, p. 281) treated mezi-
canum Brunner as a synonym of Pedies virescens Saussure. The two
specimens noted probably are the ‘“‘paratypes’”’ mentioned under
Melanoplus mexicanus by Hebard (1928, p. 279), since they are stand-
ing under M. mezicanus in the Philadelphia collection. Walker’s
Caloptenus mexicanus (1870, p. 682) was placed in the synonymy
of Platyphyma mexicanum Brunner (there called Paradichroplus
mexicanus) by Scudder (1897b, p. 19).
The early literature dealing with Melanoplus mezicanus is scanty.
Thomas (1873, p. 222) merely listed it (as Pezotettiz mexicana) from
Mexico, and he paraphrased Saussure’s description. Bruner (1908,
p. 301) stated that he saw specimens of M. devastator which were
labeled, probably by Saussure, as Pezotettix mexicana with a query.
10 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Bruner further inferred that Saussure’s type series may have been
mixed, and that another included species may have caused Brunner
von Wattenwyl (1900, p. 257) to transfer mexicana to Dichroplus.
Bruner felt that Brunner must have examined Saussure’s types. We
have not seen the material which Brunner recorded from Colombia
as Dichroplus mexicanus, but an error probably occurred. Scudder
(1897b, p. 404) listed Pezotettizx mexicana as undetermined, but
(p. 405) he suggested that it might be the same as Melanoplus atlanas.
Kirby (1910, p. 513) correctly placed mezicana near atlanis Riley
and spretus Thomas (true spretus, though incorrectly credited to
Thomas), but elsewhere (p. 487) placed it in Trigonophymus. ‘The
latter placement apparently refers only to the portion of Saussure’s
type series which Brunner associated with Colombian specimens.
Hebard (1917, p. 271) first brought the name mezicanus into general
use when he applied it to the widespread grasshoppers which wenow
recognize as a complex, and he placed atlanis of authors in synonymy,
though retaining atlanis Riley for a population of eastern United
States and vicinity.
Descriptive Notes: A small to medium-sized member of the
mexicanus group. Head with dorsal carinae of vertex more prom-
inent and conspicuous, and closer together at anterior margins of
eyes than in bilituratus, especially in male; antenna about one-third
longer than head and pronotum combined (male), about equal to
combined length (female) ; a small to medium-sized mesosternal hump
present in male.
MALE GENITALIA: Cercus with extremes as illustrated (fig. 7,a),
usually approximating that of figure 7,a-2; furculae slender, taper-
ing, usually divergent, about one-third as long as supra-anal plate;
subgenital plate moderately upturned in lateral view, twin apices
(posterior view) prominent, the intervening depression rather deep
and well rounded; dorsal valve of aedeagus not extending dorsad
nearly so far as apex of aedeagus, the anterior and dorsal margin
covered by a light membrane, a pronounced lateral process (P of
fig. 3,6) borne on ventral margin, near tip of ventral valve; accessory
lobe large for group, larger than in bilituratus.
FEMALE GENITALIA: As illustrated (fig. 10,f,¢); cercus triangular,
apex well rounded.
Cotoration: General color not distinctive, medium to dark for
group, no rich yellow specimens seen. Hind femur with four dark
transverse dorsal bands (including knee), inner paginal area irregu-
larly tinged with pinkish, followed by solid pink below, outer paginal
area dull brownish, paler along ventral margin and at base, ventral
surface deep pink; hind tibia variable, either dark pink or ashy
greenish gray.
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 11
VARIATION: Seven representative males, measured in millimeters,
vary in pronotal length from 3.3 to 4.5 (average, 4.0), in length of hind
femur from 9.5 to 13.0 (av. 11.3), and in length of tegmen from 13.2
to 19.0 (av. 16.0). The smallest male is from Atoyac, Mexico, the
largest ones from Mt. Alvarez, Mexico, and 18 miles north of Alpine,
Tex. Three measured females vary in pronotal length from 4.3 to
5.1 (av. 4.7), in length of hind femur from 12.4 to 13.5 (av. 12.8),
and in length of tegmen from 17.0 to 21.0 (av. 18.7). The tegmina of
most specimens exceed the hind femur by about the maximum width
of hind femur, by somewhat more than that in a few specimens, while
in one specimen (north of Tehuacdn) the tegmina reach only to the
femoral apices. Most, but not all, specimens collected within the
past 20 years have pink hind tibiae, but in most old specimens and a
few recent ones the hind tibiae are ash or greenish gray. Apparently
some variation occurs in nature, though killing agents and the condi-
tions of preservation may be responsibile for some loss of color.
The shape of the dorsal valve of aedeagus is variable in dry prepara-
tions, due to shriveling. The membrane along the anterior margin
then often becomes indistinct and the margin becomes irregular,
sometimes indented. The lateral process is of uniform length, for the
most part, but is below average length in the male from Alpine, Tex.
The dorsal shoulder at the base of the apical ‘‘scoop”’ of the dorsal
Ovipositor valve is somewhat variable, occasionally more angular
than in fig. 10,q.
Distripution: The map (fig. 4) shows the distribution of mexicanus,
based on specimens examined. ‘Two lots of Texas specimens have
been examined: 4 miles west of Ft. Stockton, Pecos Co., Aug. 8, 1955,
J.R. Hilliard (27, 39); in Jeff Davis Co. 18 miles north of Alpine, June
19,1939, F.B.Isely (1¢). Hebard (1917 ;1932a) listed other Mexican lo-
calities, but only one Mexican State, Querétaro, additional to those on
the map, is represented by those records. Itis probable that all or most
localities represented by Bruner’s specimens (1908) were reported
by Hebard because he acquired Bruner’s collection of North American
Orthoptera. Hebard (1925b) did not report mezxicanus from Sinaloa,
but collections from northwestern Mexico, in general, have not been
extensive. More collecting is needed to determine the distribution
of mexicanus in Texas, but the paucity of records suggests scarcity
or localized occurrence. Tinkham (1948, p. 619) had no records
other than to repeat the El Paso record of atlanis by Rehn and Hebard
(1909). El Paso specimens have not been examined, but they probably
represent WM. bilituratus defectus.
Biotocy: No detailed information on the biology of mexicanus is
available. The data on the specimens examined show occurrence in
central Nuevo Leén at altitudes of both 2,200 and 7,000-8,000 feet,
2 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
in Guerrero at altitudes ranging from 5,000 to 8,000 feet, and in
Michoacan from 6,000 to 8,000 feet. The series of about 35 Mexican
specimens examined includes captures made in all months except
January and April, and it is evident that there is more than one
generation, perhaps continuous breeding, slowed down by unfavorable
local conditions.
Melanoptus bilituratus (Walker)
This widespread, variable species is represented by most of the
material which, in recent years, has been referred to Melanoplus
mexicanus mexicanus. Exceptions are specimens now recognized
as true MM. mezxicanus, and M. spretus. Specimens of M.
bilituratus from the Far West occasionally have been confused with
M. devastator, sometimes referred to as M. mezicanus devastator. As
mapped by Newton and Gurney (1956-57) (as mezxicanus complez),
bilituratus occurs almost throughout the United States, except for
peninsular Florida. Our present maps (figs. 5, 6) are based on males
the aedeagi of which have been examined to determine the subspecies
concerned.
While more detailed research may warrant the recognition of a larger
number, the material now examined, which is representative of most
areas, seems to justify only three subspecies. ‘There is some indication
that ecological subspecies, recognized by color and size, do occur,
especially in Canada and Alaska (see p. 20). Brooks (1958, p. 20)
has recognized these differences by treating atlanis (Riley) as a valid
subspecies; however, the senior author doubts the value of applying
names to these questionable ecological subspecies at this stage in the
study, and atlanis is regarded as a synonym.
The reason that the three populations concerned are recognized
as subspecies, and not species, is that in each case intergradation in
structural characters of the aedeagus occurs. Except for material
from ‘Texas, intergrading specimens are here discussed under the
appropriate subspecies. Those from Texas are of sufficiently un-
certain relationship that it seems best to discuss them in one place.
Males from Gainesville and several other Texas localities as listed
below are typical or essentially typical of bilituratus vulturnus. Some
divergence, in that the carina of the dorsal valve of aedeagus is not
well developed, is shown by some specimens from Austin and Wichita
Falls. The male from Phantom Lake, Davis Mountains, appears
typical of belituratus defectus, but one from nearby Marfa and those
from Blanco County, Plainview, Lubbock, and Sweetwater are not
typical bilituratus defectus and are best considered intermediates of
uncertain relationship. The specimen from Kokernot Mountain,
Alpine, Tex., is unusual in that the anterior margin of the dorsal
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 13
x anterior
ancora, bridge y projection GpeKnof
. 4 Delian, main stem
1 N !
}
__ lateral
plate
ventral
valve --~
\ .
posterior A accessory —
projection lobe cad
Ficure 1.—a, Sketch showing location (circle) of mesosternal hump in ventral view of
thorax of certain species of Melanoplus. 6, Melanoplus bilituratus bilituratus, female,
Medicine Lake, Mont., apical portion of abdomen (z, cercus). c, M. femur-rubrum,
female, Poplar, Mont., same view as b. d-g, Males, showing lateral view of mesosternal
area in lateral profile: d, M. bilituratus: 1, M. b. oulturnus, Marshall, Mo.; 2, M. 6. bili-
turatus, Pullman, Wash. e¢, M. devastator: 1, 2, two specimens from Tulare, Calif.
*, M. spretus, Minnesota, Oct. 6, 1876. g, M. bruneri: 1, East Spanish Peak, Colo.
2, Fishers Peak, Colo.; 3, Mt. Moriah, Nev. h-i: M. femur-rubrum, male, Euclid;
Minn.: h, dorsal view of epiphallus; 7, aedeagus: 1, lateral view; 2, dorsoposterior views
valve is irregular (fig. 3,g); the specimen is not typical of any one of
the subspecies, nor is it like the Marfa specimen. Additional material
from western Texas is required to determine the relationship of the
one or more populations present.
Texas males of bilituratus examined are as follows:
M. bilituratus vulturnus: Gainesville, Wichita Falls, Quanah, Dallas, College
Station, Austin, Wimberley, 2 miles east of Cedar Creek, Bastrop Co.
M. bilituratus defectus: Phantom Lake (Davis Mountains).
Intermediates of uncertain relationship (M. bilituratus in a broad sense): Blanco
Co., Plainview, Lubbock, Sweetwater, Marfa.
14 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
As mentioned under the respective subspecies, the occurrence of
two annual generations has been reported for bilituratus defectus,
and evidence suggesting two generations or a partial second genera-
tion has been presented for bilituratus vulturnus and typical bilituratus.
In some cases the evidence consists of a second peak of adult abun-
dance during a year. In recent years several important discoveries have
been made concerning diapause in the eggs of grasshoppers, as re-
viewed by Lees (1955, pp. 7, 46, 68, 127). Further studies may
disclose that the subspecies of bilituratus differ with respect to dia-
pause.
Entomologists frequently have had difficulty distinguishing be-
tween the females of bilituratus (in the past usually called mezxicanus
or atlanis) and femur-rubrum. With a little practice it usually is a
simple matter to separate them by the cerci (fig. 1,6,c), which are
much more slender and apically acute in femur-rubrum.
Melanoplus bilituratus bilituratus (Walker)
Figures 1,b,d-2; 2,e,f; 3,em; 5; 6; 7,f,9,l; 8,3,m; 9,9; 10,9,n; PuatTE 1,8,c.
Caloptenus bilituratus Walker, Cat. Derm. Salt. B. M., pt. 4, p. 679, 1870 (male,
female, Vancouver Island, Canada; not 2 females, see Uvarov, 1925, p. 298).
Lectotype, designated by Uvarov (1925, p. 298): Male from Vancouver
Island (BM).
Caloptenus scriptus Walker, Cat. Derm. Salt. B. M., pt. 4, p. 680, 1870 (females,
Vancouver Island, Canada). Lectotype, designated by Uvarov (1925, p.
298): Female from Vancouver Island (BM).
Caloptenus arcticus Walker, Cat. Derm. Salt. B. M., pt. 4, p. 681, 1870 (one female,
“Arctic America. Presented by Dr. Rae’’). New synonymy.
Caloptenus atlanis Riley, Seventh Ann. Rep. Nox. Benef. Ins. Missouri, p. 169,
1875 (males, females, Boscawen, Merrimack Co., N. H.). New synonymy.
Lectotype, here designated: Male labeled ‘‘N. H., type no. 1153, U.S. N. M.,
Type, Caloptenus Atlanis Riley” (USNM).
Melanoplus atlanis, var. coeruleipes Cockerell, Entomologist, vol. 21, p. 301,
1888 (near Templar Rock, Custer Co., Colo.). New synonymy.
Melanoplus affinis Scudder, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. 36 (154), pp. 20, 32,
1897; Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, pp. 182, 171-172, pl. 12, fig. 2, 1897.
(See Hebard, 1917, footnote, p. 251.) (Males, females, 8 localities in Utah,
Wyoming, Washington, and British Columbia.) Newsynonymy. Lectotype,
designated by Rehn and Hebard (1912, p. 79): Male from Salt Lake Valley,
Utah (ANSP).
Melanoplus angelicus Scudder, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. 36 (154), pp. 22, 32,
1897; Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, pp. 133, 202-203, pl. 13, fig. 10, 1897
(2 males, Los Angeles, Calif.). New synonymy. Lectotype, designated by
Rehn and Hebard (1912, p. 80): Male from Los Angeles, Calif. (USNM).
Melanoplus intermedius Scudder, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. 36 (154), pp. 20,
32, 1897; Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, pp. 132, 172-174, pl. 12, figs. 3, 4,
1897 (males, females, 5 localities in Colorado, Montana, Wyoming, Idaho,
and Washington). New synonymy. Lectotype, designated by Rehn and
Hebard (1912, p. 79): Male from Yellowstone, Mont. (ANSP).
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 15
Melanoplus sierranus Scudder, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. 36 (154), pp. 21, 32,
1897; Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, pp. 133, 193-194, pl. 13, fig. 1, 1897
(males, females, Lake Tahoe, Placer Co., Calif.; Placer Co., Calif.; Truckee,
Nevada Co., Calif.). Newsynonymy. Lectotype, designated by Rehn and
Hebard (1912, p. 80): Male from Truckee, Nevada Co., Calif. (MCZ).
Melanoplus dimidipennis Bruner, Colorado Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 94, pp. 66-67,
1904 (one male, Fort Collins, Colo.). New synonymy.
The unique type of dimidipennis and all lectotypes except those of
bilituratus and scriptus have been examined. Uvarov (1925) synony-
mized scriptus and also suggested (p. 299) that arcticus may represent
M. femur-rubrum (De Geer), but Dr. David R. Ragge (in litt., Feb.
22, 1957) has reported that the cercus of the unique female type of
arcticus is much blunter than that of femur-rubrum, and he states
definitely that the two names are not synonymous. He has found
that except for pale color arcticus agrees very well with an Alaskan
specimen of bilituratus which was sent for comparison; the wing
lengths of the two specimens are almost identical. Since the Rae
specimen described by Walker apparently came from the region of the
Mackenzie and Slave Rivers (see Richardson, 1852, p. 476), and
specimens of bilituratus from that region agree essentially with the
Alaskan ones, we regard arcticus as a synonym. Hebard (1928, pp.
279-280) placed affinis, atlanis, and intermedius as synonyms of
M. mexicanus mexicanus; this was done without reference to the
aedeagus. Hebard (1929, p. 391) placed dimidipennis as a synonym
of brunerz; however, the aedeagus of the type shows that it is belituratus.
The type of dimidipennis is small and unusually short-winged, with
the external genitalia including features like both bruneri and
bilturatus, but not fully typical of either. It probably is an abnormal
individual, as Hebard suggested. Scudder (1879b, p. 179) placed
coeruletpes as a synonym of atlanis. No type specimens of coeruleipes
are known, and since Cockerell (1888) simply applied the name
without a formal description to individuals of atlanis (as then so-called)
with bluish hind tibiae, and only one nominal form of bilituratus occurs
in the area concerned, coeruleipes is relegated to the synonymy. The
spelling was given as “caeruleipes’’ by Cockerell (1889).
DescrIPTIVE NotEs: A usually medium-sized, fully winged member
of the mezicanus group. Head with dorsal carinae of vertex moder-
ately prominent; mesosternal hump strongly developed in male,
absent in female.
MALE GENITALIA: Cercus variable (fig. 7,f), over most of eastern
half of range about as in figure 7,f-1; in Utah, California, Idaho,
Oregon, Washington, and coastal British Columbia averaging nar-
rower (fig. 7,f-2-4); in Nevada often decidedly slender, especially
from near Reno (fig. 7,f-5-6); furculae about one-third to nearly
one-half as long as supra-anal plate, straight or divergent; subgenital
16 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
plate (fig. 10,w) with twin apices usually conspicuous, rarely poorly
differentiated. Aedeagus with dorsal valve well sclerotized and with
a narrow to rather wide marginal fold, anterior margin usually broadly
rounded, rarely with traces of sinuation such as in bilituratus defectus;
accessory lobe of medium size for group; epiphallus with lophus
rarely showing anterior angulation in lateral view, and then poorly
developed, usually erect, in dorsal view the apex of pean broad and
semitruncate (figs. 2,e,f; 3,e; 8,7,m).
FEMALE GENITALIA: Geneon (fig. 10,9) cae relatively
blunt; dorsal valve of ovipositor with “scoop” (fig. 10,n) moderately
rounded, the shoulder obtusely angular.
VARIATION: The size of 11 representative males, measured in
millimeters, varies in pronotal length from 3.4 to 5.1 (av. 4.3), in
length of hind femur from 9.8 to 13.7 (av. 11.6), and in length of
tegmen from 15.0 to 25.0 (av. 21.1). Eight measured females vary
in pronotal length from 3.7 to 5.5 (av. 4.7), in length of hind femur
from 12.0 to 14.0 (av. 12.8), and in length of tegmen from 17.0 to
21.0 (av. 18.0). Eastern specimens average smaller than those from
the West.
Tegminal length is decidedly variable. Unusually long-winged
specimens are occasionally encountered. Among them are a female
from Doniphan Co., Kans., Sept. 9, 1940, with tegmina reaching
9 mm. posterior to the hind femora, and two females taken in Fergus
Co., Mont., Aug. 16, 1940, with comparable measurements of 6.5
and 7.5mm. A series of six females and two males was found dead
in a recently baited field at Fort Benton, Mont., July 14, 1940, by
Parker and Butcher. The average length of the tegmina extending
beyond the hind femora in the females of that series is 5.1 mm., with
EXPLANATION OF FIGURE 2
Lateral views of aedeagus, and (b only) dorsal view of aedeagus and epiphallus in natural
position within phallic complex.
Melanoplus bruneri, Ft. McLeod, Alberta, Canada.
mexicanus, Mt. Alvarez, Mexico.
mexicanus, Guerrero, Mexico.
. bilituratus bilituratus, Placer Co., Calif.
. bilituratus bilituratus, Victoria, Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada.
. bilituratus, uncertain subspecific position, Guymon, Okla.
. bilituratus, uncertain subspecific position, 18 miles north of Alpine, Tex.
. bilituratus defectus, Mesilla Park, N. Mex.
. bilituratus oulturnus, Stone Mountain, Ga.
. devastator, lectotype.
M. bilituratus defectus, Casa Grande, Ariz.
Melanoplus sp., probably abnormal bilituratus oulturnus, Muscatine Co., Iowa.
M. spretus, Nebraska.
a,
ong ee
RESRSSRERS
GRASSHOPPERS—-GURNEY AND BROOKS 17
Ficure 2.—Explanation on facing page.
477119—59—_2
18 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
a maximum of 8.5; for the males the average is 8.3, the maximum 11.0
mm. The aedeagus of the shorter-winged of the two males is normal
for bilituratus bilituratus, and the cercus is comparatively narrow.
The other male, with a wider cercus (fig. 7,g), has the dorsal valve of
the aedeagus rather irregular along the lateroanterior margin, but
without any indication of spretus. A male with a similarly abnormal
dorsal valve was taken in Flathead Co., Mont., July 8, 1917, and its
tegmina exceed the hind femora by 5.5mm. Rehn (1952) noted the
considerable variation shown by Alaskan specimens. The folded
tegmina of some individuals examined by him scarcely surpassed the
apices of hind femora, while those of other individuals exceeded the
femora by a distance about equal to pronotal length.
Rehn and Hebard (1906), under the names intermedius, atlanis, and
bilituratus, discussed the variation observed in the cerci and other
organs of specimens from various Western States. When recording
this grasshopper from Oregon, Fulton (1930) used the name MM.
mexicanus bilituratus, and he observed that cerci of males vary from a
little less than twice as long as middle width to nearly three times as
long as broad. He noted that a series from Malin had consistently
narrower cerci than those from other Oregon localities.
It is evident from rearing experiments under different conditions
of temperature, relative humidity, and food (Parker, 1930) for
bilituratus bilituratus (called mexicanus mezxicanus), that size, color,
spotting of tegmen, length of tegmen, and color of hind tibia vary in
EXPLANATION OF FicureE 3
Except as noted, lateral views of aedeagus drawn from preparations in glycerine.
a: Melanoplus spretus: 1, Arapahoe Peak, Colo.; 2, 3, neotype, posterior and lateral views
of aedeagus, dry preparation.
b: M. mexicanus: 1, 18 miles north of Alpine, Tex.; 2, Durango, Mex., lateroventral view
of aedeagus (p, lateral projection).
c: M. bilituratus oulturnus: 1, holotype, dry; 2, Priest Bridge, Md. (m, membranous fold;
x, carina; y, hooklike apex; z, concave area).
d: M. bilituratus defectus, Tempe, Ariz., reared (x, anterior margin; y, flaplike area of
dorsal valve; z, sinuate margin of flap).
e: M. bilituratus bilituratus, Wasaga Beach, Ontario, Canada.
Ff: Intermediate between M. bilituratus bilituratus and M. bilituratus defectus, Baker, Nev.,
dorsal valve only.
g: M. bilituratus, uncertain subspecific position, Kokernot Mt., Alpine, Tex., dorsal valve
only.
M. bilituratus defectus, Chandler, Ariz.
M. devastator, Roseville, Calif.
M. borealis borealis, Nachvak Bay, Labrador, Canada.
M. bruneri, Mt. Moriah, Nev. (x, triangular projection of dorsal rim of dorsal valve).
Same specimen as &, right half of aedeagus in dorsal view.
M. bilituratus bilituratus, Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada, same view as J.
Se.
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS
Ficure 3.—Explanation on facing page.
19
20 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
response to ecological conditions. For these reasons, and perhaps
because of genetic factors as well, bilituratus bilituratus shows much
diversity in superficial appearance. This is especially evident in
regions where a number of comparatively distinct, large, and relatively
stable ecological associations occur; such large and diverse areas occur
across southern Canada and in the mountains. The junior author
has attempted to segregate Canadian specimens on the basis of the
above and other external characters. In the southern coastal areas of
British Columbia and from Vancouver Island there are small to
medium-sized, moderately dark, often more hairy specimens, the
tegmina frequently barely covering the abdomen. In most of the
interior of southern British Columbia (range lands) specimens of
moderate size, more brownish, and with red hind tibiae occur. A
single series taken at Westbank, British Columbia, in 1923 includes
rather large, predominantly yellowish specimens with the tegmina
only about long enough to cover the abdomen. In northern British
Columbia, Northwest Territories, and in Alaska the type usually
developed is very large, blackish, with reddish hind tibiae, and very
long tegmina; obviously of the same type but somewhat smaller are
specimens from the foothills of Alberta and from the forested regions
of Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba. In the grasslands of
southern Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba the predominant
type is of moderate size and grayish, with the tegmina extending
scarcely beyond the abdomen, and usually with bluish or buff hind
tibiae; in the eastern, more humid part of this area (parklands) the
form is similar but more brownish and more often with reddish hind
tibiae, very like specimens from interior British Columbia. In
Ontario and Quebec specimens are nearly intermediate between those
from the forested area of the prairie provinces and from the eastern
grasslands, usually have red hind tibiae, and are comparatively
stable in appearance. In dry years, during periods of grasshopper
abundance, and when there is a trend toward swarming, the grassland
types of central Canada develop longer tegmina, are of increased size
and paler color, and usually have bluish hind tibiae. By and large,
in Canada, observations suggest that most if not all major ecological
areas have a smaller, grayer, shorter-winged type during “poor
grasshopper years’ and a larger, more yellow, and longer-winged
type during ‘“‘good grasshopper years.” ‘These differences seem more
noticeable in areas which generally are dry than in those where
moisture is abundant.
Genitalic characters of the populations in different parts of Canada
do not differ significantly or consistently enough to warrant, at this
stage of our knowledge, the recognition of separate subspecies. It
would appear that the superficial appearance of the populations in
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS vA
different areas is largely the result of surrounding conditions. Even-
tually, studies may show that the recognition of additional named
segregates is desirable.
The dorsal valve of the aedeagus may have a narrow anterior flap
and a rather shallow lateral concavity (figs. 2,f; 3,e), or approach the
more swollen type found in intergrades with defectus (fig. 3,f), with
wide anterior margin and deep lateral concavity. Practice is re-
quired to become familiar with the variation, which apparently is
partly individual and partly geographic. A very small male with
abortive wings, collected at Clark,;Wyo., Aug. 7, 1937, has the dorsal
valve rather stubby, without the usual details, and apparently im-
perfect because of the failure of the individual to develop normally.
Ficure 4.—Distribution of male specimens of Melanoplus mexicanus examined.
The distribution of males of bilituratus bilituratus examined is shown
in figures 5 and 6.
BIoLoGY AND ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE: The great importance of M.
bilituratus bilituratus, which represents the northern subspecies of what
usually has been called M. mezicanus or M. atlanis, is well known.
Important bulletins dealing with this grasshopper are by Herrick and
Hadley (1916) and by Shotwell (1930, 1941). Although crop and
range damage occur most often west of the Mississippi River, injury
on a smaller scale occurs in the Eastern States. Washburn (1953)
described a severe outbreak on two farms near Palmer, Alaska, in late
July 1951, in which populations up to 300 per square yard were
pap PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
recorded, and vegetables, oats and raspberries were seriously injured.
Early July in that locality was the warmest in 35 years, and that
condition may have brought about the early maturity and great
abundance of this grasshopper.
M. bilituratus bilituratus is decidedly migratory at times, and in
areas of abundance is usually much more inclined to loose group
movements than are most grasshopper species. Parker, Newton,
and Shotwell (1955) have described the spectacular flights which in
1938-1940 occurred in North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, and
portions of nearby States and Canada. These flights occurred during
an outbreak cycle, and a general population increase had preceded the
flights. Drake and Tauber (1946) discussed flights which entered
Towa from the west in 1941 and earlier years.
Corkins (1922) reported on extensive flights in 1920, mainly in
Bottineau and Renville Counties, N. Dak., and he noted their re-
semblance to the historic flights of spretus. By the use of an airplane
one heavy swarm was examined and found to be most dense at an
altitude of 500-800 feet, with a few individuals at 1,650 feet.
Nymphs as well as adults occasionally migrate (Parker, et al.,
1955, p. 16; Shotwell, 1930, p. 24).
Early papers (Herrick and Hadley, 1916; Shotwell, 1930) gave the
impression that bilituratus bilituratus is almost omnivorous in its food
habits. In recent years, however, entomologists have become keenly
aware that many grasshoppers are far from being the general feeders
which they were once thought to be, and several investigations
Figure 5.—Distribution of male specimens of Melanoplus bilituratus bilituratus examined
from Alaska and Canada.
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 23
suggest that bilituratus bilituratus has definite responses and prefer-
ences concerning food plants. In cage studies conducted in eastern
Wyoming, Pfadt (1949) found that adults preferred dandelion and
wheat to all other plants which he tested, that tansymustard and
dandelion gave the most nymphal growth, and that dandelion, wheat,
and tansymustard were most favorable to egg production. In
Manitoba, Smith, Hanford, and Chefurka (1952) fed certain plants
through three successive generations (in cages) and recorded survival,
rate of development, and the number of eggs laid. They found that
wheat, barley, and dandelion were the most favorable food plants,
and that Russian thistle and alfalfa were the least favorable. How-
ever, Anderson and Wright (1952) found during Montana field studies
that feeding occurred on a wide variety of plants, representing a
wider host range than suggested by Pfadt’s cage studies. Hebard
(1929, p. 391) recorded a pair of Melanoplus (probably bilituratus
bilituratus) from Perth, Nev., which were very small, with malformed,
reduced wings. They occurred in alfalfa and, although normal
specimens were abundant, perhaps the pair in question fed entirely
or mainly on alfalfa. Scharff (1954) reviewed the effects of food plants
and weather.
Environments occupied by bilituratus bilituratus are extremely
variable, Hebard (1925a, p. 112) stating that it (alanis) ‘‘is equally at
home in weedy waste land or on the sage-brush plains, its environment
having a very decided effect on its general appearance.’’ The general
preference for light, sandy soils has been mentioned by Morse (1920).
In the grain belt (Shotwell, 1930) it frequents fence row areas and
wheat-stubble fields, especially where Russian thistle grows. In
southern Michigan, Cantrall (1943) concluded that this grasshopper
is characteristic of, and prefers, a mixed grass-herbaceous habitat, and
that in many other environments where the grasshopper appears it
probably is a sporadic member of the fauna, since it wanders a great
deal.
Altitudinally, the range of bilituratus bilituratus captures extends
from sea level in many places to the Alpine Zone (see Alexander, 1951,
pp. 107-108, for critical comments on occurrence in the Alpine Zone
of Colorado, also notes by Gurney, 1953, p. 317). Through the
courtesy of Dr. George E. Wallace, Carnegie Museum, we have
examined a rather long-winged male of bilituratus bilituratus taken by
the late Dr. Walter Sweadner, Aug. 9, 1932, at an altitude of 7,200
feet, imbedded in the Sperry Glacier, Glacier National Park, Mont.
No further details are available.
In New England bilituratus bilituratus occurs from the seashore to
the summits of the highest mountains (Morse, 1920). Some altitudes
on the labels of specimens examined are as follows: Junction of Moose
VOL. 110
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM
24
*BaITI[BDO]
soqv1g PeHUp) Woy poulurexs snjoinjrrg “PY pur snuvrixau snjfouvjray JO suowttoads ayeus JO UOIINqIIsIG—9 TANI
"OU
uoyjisod oj1oedsqns
UuiDpsaoun yo snyoanyiig
SNUANINA— SNyoOINyiyhIq
SOJOIPAWAajUI SNyOayap—SnjosnjI IgG
SNyoajep snyosnyiyig *
SNJOIN| IG SNyoINyLIIG °
snupoixaw *
GRASSHOPPERS—-GURNEY AND BROOKS 25
Pass-Hope Highway and Moose Pass-Kenai Highway, Alaska, 1,800
ft.; Signal Peak, Wash., 5,000 ft.; Wasatch Mts., Utah, 7,400 ft.;
Chaffee Co., Colo., 8,000—8,500 ft.
The classic report on the effects of temperature and moisture on
this grasshopper is by Parker (1930). MacCarthy (1956) dealt with
the correlation between adult populations and weather factors in
Saskatchewan.
Criddle (1918, 1924) and Shotwell (1930) are among those who have
described the egg pods of biliiwratus bilituratus, and Cantrall (1943)
gave a detailed account of the way the ovipositing female prepares
the hole in the soil. Parker (1930) recorded one caged female which
laid 15 egg pods, and the average for 30 females observed by him was
8.8 pods. Other data on egg production were presented by Pfadt
(1949) and Smith, Handford, and Chefurka (1952). In laboratory
cages, using material from central Saskatchewan, Pickford (personal
communication to A. R. B.) has obtained an average of 30 pods for
each of 9 females with a calculated maximum of 43 pods (872 eggs)
for one female of the lot.
A description by Handford (1946) compared nymphs of bilituratus
bilituratus with those of other species of Melanoplus. The seasonal
history varies a great deal, depending on the weather (Shotwell, 1930,
p. 23) and the location. The majority of adults studied by us were
collected in July or August, but those collections undoubtedly reflect
the habits of collectors almost as much as those of the grasshopper.
Shotwell has noted oviposition as late as November. Cantrall (1943)
found adults from early July until late October in Michigan, and he
suspected that there were two generations. It is suspected that two
years are required for the completion of the life cycle in parts of
British Columbia (Canad. Insect Pest Rev., vol. 34, p. 273, 1956).
Melanoplus bilituratus vulturnus, new subspecies
Figures 1,d-1; 2,j,m; 3,c; 6; 7,d; 8,k; 9,f; 10,0; 15,b,c; PLate 1,p,£.
Mate (holotype): Size medium for group; fully winged; general
appearance as in M. bilituratus bilituratus. Pronotum not strangulate
in dorsal view, the posterior margin with the sides forming an angle
of about 120°, apex well rounded; median carina of prozona and meta-
zona proportioned as to length as 21 : 24, in lateral view only slightly
depressed at the principal sulcus; tegmen with portion extending
posterior to the apex of the hind femur in proportion to tegminal
length as 3.5:17.5; hind femur moderately swollen for group.
Furculae slender, sharply tapered, scarcely divergent, extending one-
third the length of supra-anal plate; cercus as in figure 7,d-1; sub-
genital plate moderately upturned, with twin apices closely associated,
evident but poorly separated.
26 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Aedeagus (dry) as in figure 3,c-1, the apex of the dorsal valve
strongly curved laterally with anterior margin very heavily sclerotized
and excavate along entire length, main portion of dorsal valve less
heavily but well sclerotized, decidedly concave, dorsal marginal
membrane inconspicuous. Epiphallus with apex of each lophus
(fig. 8,k) broad in dorsal view, in lateral view with lophus erect,
much elevated, the apical margin barely angulate anteriorly.
Coloration: General coloration pale brown, with the customary
markings of blackish, mottled with undertones of brown; head with
fairly wide blackish brown postocular bar; pronotum mottled with
brown above, laterally with irregular blackish longitudinal bar; tegmen
lightly speckled with brown, markings very inconspicuous on apical
half; hind femur with three fairly noticeable dorsal dark bars, these
weakly suggested on external paginal area, ventral portion of paginal
area yellowish, section between paginal area and ventral keel pink,
ventral and mesal surfaces yellowish, with traces of pinkish, knee
crescents black; hind tibiae pale, greenish gray mesally and yellowish
brown externally, spines and apical half of spurs blackish brown.
Measurements in millimeters: Body, 22.0; pronotum, 4.5; front
femur, 3.5; hind femur, 12.0; tegmen, 17.5. Greatest width of
pronotum (posterior, including lateral lobes in perspective from above),
3.8; of hind femur, 2.9.
EXPLANATION OF FiGuRE 7
a-j: Lateral view of left cercus of male.
a: Melanoplus mexicanus: 1, from Bledos, Mexico; 2, from Teotihuacan, Mexico.
b: M. spretus: 1, neotype; 2, from Kansas, 1874.
ce: M. bilituratus defectus, Casa Grande, Ariz.
d: M. bilituratus oulturnus: 1, holotype; 2, from Quincy, Fla.; 3, from Independ-
ence, Kans.; 4, from Nantucket, Mass.
e: M. bilituratus defectus: 1, from Tempe, Ariz.; 2, from Camarillo, Calif.;
3, from Mount Charleston, Nev.
Ff: M. bilituratus bilituratus: 1, from Gun Lake, Mich.; 2, from Washington
Territory; 3, from Spokane, Wash.; 4, from Eureka, Calif.; 5, from Placer
Co., Calif.; 6, from Doyle, Calif.
M. bilituratus bilituratus, with abnormal dorsal valve, Fort Benton, Mont.
M. devastator: 1, from Clarkson, Calif.; 2, from Roseburg, Calif.; 3, from
Sisson, Calif.; 4, from Grant’s Pass, Oreg.; 5, from Alpine, Calif.
i: M. bruneri: 1, 2, from Ft. McLeod, Alberta, Canada (2 specimens); 3, from
Chilcotin, British Columbia, Canada; 4, from Mt. Moriah, Nev.
j: M. borealis borealis: 1, from Churchill, Manitoba, Canada; 2, from Laggan,
Alberta, Canada; 3, from Matanuska, Alaska; 4, from Cummington, Mass.;
5, from Grant, Colo.
k,l: Ventral view of right cercus of male (basal end at bottom of page):
k: M. devastator, Tacoma, Wash.
l: M. bilituratus bilituratus, Dorris, Calif.
Sale
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS
J | ‘
Ficure 7.—Explanation on facing page.
27
28 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Frmate (allotype): General form as in male, slightly more robust;
differing as follows: Compound eyes less globose; longitudinal carinae
of vertex more widely separated and less prominent; median carina
of prozona and metazona proportioned as 21:26, in lateral view some-
what more angulate at principal sulcus; mesosternal hump lacking;
cercus as in bilituratus defectus (fig. 10,h); dorsal valve of ovipositor
as in figure 10,0.
Coloration: Somewhat darker than in holotype; hind tibia red.
Measurements in millimeters: Body, 23.0; pronotum, 4.7; front
femur, 3.2; hind femur, 13.0; tegmen, 18.0. Greatest width of
pronotum, 4.2; of hind femur, 3.2.
VARIATION: The size of 10 representative males measured (in milli-
meters) varies in pronotal length from 3.5 to 5.0 (av. 4.4), in length
of hind femur from 10.0 to 14.0 (av. 12.0), and in length of tegmen
from 15.5 to 21.8 (av. 18.3). Six measured females vary in pronotal
length from 4.2 to 5.3 (av. 4.7), in length of hind femur from 11.5 to
14.0 (av. 12.8), and in length of tegmen from 16.5 to 23.5 (av. 18.5).
Western specimens average larger than eastern ones. In most speci-
mens the tegmen extends about 2 to 3 mm. beyond the apex of the
hind femur, but in some it scarcely exceeds it by as much as 5 mm.
The male cercus usually is essentially like that of the holotype, but
the tiny apicoventral “tooth” frequently is absent, and general shape
is somewhat variable (fig. 7,d-2,d-4). Very little variation in the
shape of the epiphallus has been noted.
Intergradation is shown by the shape of the dorsal valve of the
aedeagus; in intermediate specimens the ventroanterior margin of the
dorsal valve varies between the clearly excavate one of bilituratus
vulturnus and the simply recurved margin of bilituratus bilituratus.
Wet preparations often show membranous folds apically (“‘m” of
fig. 3,c). Some intergrading specimens represent one of the two sub-
species more strongly; others represent the other one, and some are
fully intermediate. In some cases, as is true of material from Erie
and Wood Counties, Ohio, and from Lafayette, Ind., fairly large
series of males taken at the same time and place vary. This situation
suggests that a mingling of genes of the two subspecies is occurring
and that the populations are intergrading, though certain individuals
appear nearly typical of one subspecies.
A specimen collected at Muscatine, Iowa, Sept. 12, 1935, by R. L.
King probably is bilituratus vulturnus, but the dorsal valve (fig. 2,m)
is very unusual, recalling certain very long-winged Arizona specimens
of bilituratus defectus. The specimen is very long-winged, the tegmen
27 mm. long and extending 11.5 mm. posterior to the hind femur.
In 1935 Iowa was experiencing a buildup of grasshoppers, but there
is no record of extensive flights into the State then, though at other
GRASSHOPPERS—-GURNEY AND BROOKS 29
times “light swarms of what appeared to be nearly typical spretus
entered Iowa from the northwest and settled down in the western
and southwestern parts of the state’ (Drake and Tauber, 1946).
The aedeagus of this specimen appears to be abnormal, but an
explanation of this condition merits future attention.
Special interest is attached to the material reared by Brett (1947)
which he ascribed to M. mezxicanus and the most long-winged speci-
mens of which he believed comparable to spretus, the latter considered
by him a synonym. Specimens were deposited in the U.S. National
Museum by Dr. Brett, and additional ones have been loaned by
F, A. Fenton of Oklahoma A. & M. College, where Brett’s main
reared series are preserved. He reared specimens in cages, mainly
feeding head lettuce, alfalfa, corn, and sorghum. The largest indi-
viduals reared were fed head lettuce at 100° F. and 35 percent and
50 percent relative humidity. Some of them resembled spretus in
body size and tegminal length, though none of them examined by us
has the spretus-type of aedeagus. At the other extreme, individuals
reared on alfalfa were comparatively small, and in many of those
reared under cool, humid conditions the tegmina were poorly developed
as well as short.
The aedeagus of a total of 65 males from the Brett material has
been examined, these specimens representing the extremes of temper-
ature and relative humidity under which rearing occurred, as well
as tegminal lengths varying from abortive to extending as much as
6 mm. posterior to the hind femoral apices. Dr. Brett has informed
us (in litt., Dec. 17, 1956) that his steck used at temperatures of 75°
and 80° F. was collected at Bennet, Nebr. (about 11 miles southeast
of Lincoln), that stock for rearings at temperatures above 80° was
collected near Stillwater, Okla., and that no Kansas stock was used.
Reared material from both the Nebraska and Oklahoma stocks is
variable in the structure of the dorsal value of the aedeagus, and there
are indications that both stocks are from tension areas where bilituratus
bilituratus and bilituratus vulturnus influence occurs, but the great
majority of males may readily be recognized as bilituratus vulturnus
and we have not considered them intergrades. Males collected at
Lincoln, Nebr., and Stillwater, Okla., are comparable to the reared
series in aedeagal structures and variation. No reared specimen
has an aedeagus like that of spretus, but several reared specimens
have the dorsal valve well sclerotized and with little of the shape
characteristic of adults of bilituratus vulturnus. It seems most likely
that the aedeagus of these specimens failed to mature completely,
though the cerci, supra-anal plate, and subgenital plate are, with
few exceptions, the type normal for adult bilituratus vulturnus. The
tegmina of these particular specimens are mostly abortive or mal-
30 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
formed, suggesting that the individuals had difficulty developing
normally.
Twelve males from Pittsburgh, Pa., have been examined, including
four from a single area within the city, Forbes Field. As a whole,
the aedeagus indicates an intergrading population, with no specimens
fully typical of either bilituratus bilituratus or bilituratus vulturnus.
There is variation, even within the series from Forbes Field, but most
of the specimens are nearer bilituratus vulturnus. Although Presque
Isle, Pa., is considerably north of Pittsburgh, the two males from
there both are typical of bilituratus vulturnus. Perhaps a series would
show intergradation. Jennings (1909) reported that though the
flora of Presque Isle is more northern than southern in its affinities,
some of the plants are typical of those centering in the lower Ohio
basin and on the Piedmont Plateau. Possibly this grasshopper
represents such a relationship. Jennings illustrated the many
ecological habitats which occur on Presque Isle.
The single male from Nantucket examined is typical bilituratus
vulturnus, though a male from Marion, in the nearby Fall River area
of Massachusetts, is intermediate. Other Massachusetts specimens
EXPLANATION OF FicurRe 8
a-e: Left cercus of male, lateral view:
a: Melanoplus borealis palaceus: 1, holotype; 2, topotype; 3, 4, from Lake-
view area, Mont. (2 specimens).
b: M. borealis utahensis: 1, holotype; 2, from Ogden, Utah; 3, from Big
Cottonwood Canyon, Utah.
c: Intermediate between M. borealis utahensis and M. b. palaceus, 3 miles
north of Mantua, Utah.
d: M. borealis stupefactus: 1, lectotype; 2, from Los Pinos, Colo.; 3, from
Mineral Co., Colo.
e: Intermediate between M. borealis stupefactus, M. b. palaceus, and M. b.
borealis, Tomboy, Colo.
f-i: Outline of epiphallus in dorsal view:
f: M. borealis borealis, Nachvak Bay, Labrador, Canada.
g: M. b. utahensis, holotype.
h: M. b. stupefactus, holotype of latifercula.
i: M. bilituratus defectus, Casa Grande, Ariz.
j-l (2): Outline of epiphallus of male in dorsal view, lophi only:
j: M. bilituratus bilituratus, Tuttle, Idaho.
k: M. bilituratus oulturnus, holotype, dry preparation.
lz: M. devastator: 1, from Davis, Calif.; 2, from Sacramento Co., Calif.
1(3)-m: Epiphallus in lateral view [/ (5)—m showing lateral outline of lophus only):
I: M. devastator: 3, lectotype; 4, from Roseville, Calif.; 5, from Tacoma,
Wash., dry preparation; 6, from Tulare, Calif., dry preparation;
7, from Gibson, Calif.; 8, same specimen as 7, in lateroposterior view;
9, from Lower Lake, Calif.
m: M. bilituratus bilituratus, Milford, Calif.
PAV LYN BRA
DAP NSN
Pet NS TS
32 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
are typical bilituratus bilituratus. Detailed field work in south-
eastern Massachusetts might be very informative. Scudder (1878a)
noted that Nantucket specimens (reported as atlanis) have a peculiar
coloring and nearly all specimens have pale glaucous hind tibiae.
Griscom and Folger (1948) reported that the limited flora and fauna
of Nantucket include “many southern and relict species,’’ and the
climate averages milder than that of Boston. A comparable situation
probably occurs in the relation of Long Island to upstate New York.
It is surprising that intermediate specimens or typical bilituratus have
not been found in the Appalachian Mountains south of Pennsylvania.
Specimens from Spruce Knob, W. Va., and Mt. Davis, Pa., show a
slight trend toward bilituratus bilituratus, though they are not recog-
nized as intermediates.
Color variation in bilituratus vuliurnus runs through the usual range
common to this group. About 18 percent of the specimens examined
have pale or glaucous hind tibiae, the remainder red. Brett (1947,
pp. 32-33) felt that food, temperature, and humidity are closely
related to the color of the hind tibiae. Specimens reared by him on
corn and head lettuce had a higher percentage of red hind tibiae than
those reared on alfalfa. High temperature and humidity tended to
produce red tibiae. On the other hand, King and Slifer (1955), after
rearings from stock collected at Iowa City, Iowa, concluded that red
hind tibiae “are dependent on the presence of a dominant, autosomal
gene and that blue tibiae are produced when its recessive allele is
present in the homozygous condition.””, Nymphs which Brett reared
under crowded conditions tended to develop dark patterns character-
istic of the gregarious phase of migratory grasshoppers, but adults
resulting from such rearings were not distinctively colored, and they
tended to have shorter wings than those reared under solitary con-
ditions (Brett, 1947, p. 37).
EXPLANATION OF FIGURE 9
Dorsal view of supra-anal plate and furculae of males; f and h(2) show full view of apical
portion of abdomen.
a: M. bruneri: 1, from Ft. McLeod, Alberta, Canada; 2, from Mt. Moriah, Nev.; 3, from
Crook Co., Wyo.
b: Intermediate between M. borealis utahensis and M. b. palaceus, 3 miles north of Mantua,
Utah.
c: M. borealis borealis: 1, from Matanuska, Alaska; 2, from Chelsea, Iowa; 3, from Church-
ill, Manitoba, Canada.
M. borealis stupefactus: 1, from Los Pinos, Colo.; 2, from Mineral Co., Colo.
M. borealis utahensis: 1, from Big Cottonwood Canyon, Utah; 2, from Ogden, Utah.
M. bilituratus oulturnus, Stokes, S. C.
M. bilituratus bilituratus, Pompey’s Pillar, Mont.
M. devastator, 1, from San Bernardino, Calif.; 2, from Chico, Calif.
TAT A
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS
Figure 9.—Explanation on facing page.
477119593
34 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Type: USNM 63543.
TYPE LOCALITY: Stokes, Colleton Co., S. C.
The holotype male was collected by Miss Lotta Bootle in September
1924. The allotype (USNM) was taken at Columbia, S. C., Sept. 22,
1923, by Philip Luginbill.
There are 99 male and 36 female paratypes deposited in the U. S.
National Museum, Canadian National Museum, Academy of Natural
Sciences of Philadelphia, Museum of Comparative Zoology, University
of Michigan, University of Arizona, Clemson Agricultural College,
Florida Plant Board, and the collection of John R. Hilliard. The para-
types are from the following localities:
Norra Carouina: Weldon, Greensboro, Pilot Mt., Charlotte, Roan Valley, Mt.
Mitchell, Asheville, Hendersonville, Black Mts., Valley of Black Mts., Balsam,
Sunburst, Highlands.
Soutu Carotina: Green Sea, Mullins, Cheraw, Florence, Manning, Columbia,
St. Paul, Eutawville, Stokes, Clemson, Madison.
GrorciA: Rabun Bald, Black Rock Mountain, Tallulah Falls, Louisville, Dublin,
Stone Mountain, Atlanta, Locust Grove, Cedar Rocks (5 miles north of Jackson),
Barnesville, Macon, Montezuma, Smithville, Calhoun, Sand Mountain (near
Trenton).
Fiorina: Gainesville, Alachua Co., Hamilton Co., Houston, Lake Miccosuke
(Jefferson Co.), Quincy, Gadsden Co., Rock Bluff Landing (Liberty Co.),
“Camp Torreya” (Liberty Co.), Jackson Co., Marianna, Chipola.
ALABAMA: Auburn, Stokes, Selma, Greenville, Flomaton, Canebreak.
MississipP1: Meridian, Perkinston, Jackson, Vicksburg.
LovistANA: Harahan, Ruston, Sibley.
Most of the specimens from additional localities shown on the map
(fig. 6) for bilituratus vulturnus are typical, but some vary toward
bilituratus bilituratus, though not sufficiently to be considered inter-
mediates, and so are not designated as paratypes. However, males
from other localities, as mapped, are considered intermediates between
bilituratus bilituratus and bilituratus vulturnus.
BIOLOGY AND ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE: In many localities bilituratus
vulturnus becomes extremely abundant, and it is highly important
economically, especially in the western part of its range. Kansas,
Oklahoma, and Missouri are the chief States where it is very injurious.
Wilbur and Fritz (1940) stated that during the 1933-39 outbreak in the
bluestem region of eastern Kansas it was the most injurious crop infest-
ing grasshopper, and they briefly described the buildup of its popu-
lation during several drought years.
Morse (1904, p. 42) referred to this grasshopper as ‘‘probably the
most widely and generally distributed” of those found in the South-
eastern States, but this opinion differs from that of Rehn and Hebard
(1916, p. 237), who found bilituratus vulturnus (reported as atlanis)
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 35
“relatively infrequent in the Coastal Plain south of North Carolina
and the lower Gulf drainage of southern Georgia, in addition to having
never been definitely recorded from peninsular Florida.’’ Material
examined suggests that in northern Florida bilituratus vulturnus is
fairly widely distributed, though it is not generally abundant. Friauf
(1953) examined a wide variety of grassland and other habitats on an
area of about 2,180 acres in Putnam County, Fla., collecting an esti-
mated 24,000 specimens of Orthoptera and Dermaptera during a period
of more than 15 months in the field, yet he did not find bilituratus
vulturnus. There is a paucity of records from the lower coastal plain
of South Carolina and Georgia. The pertinent physiographic regions
are shown on a map by Rehn and Hebard (1916, p. 95), and a com-
parison of their collecting stations (map, p. 91) with those indicated
by Morse (1904, p. 10) suggests that the latter did relatively less
sampling of the coastal plain fauna in Georgia and South Carolina,
while his collecting trip (made in 1903) did not include peninsular
Florida at all.
This grasshopper occurs most frequently in fields and uncultivated,
open areas. Fox (1917) mentioned its tendency to congregate in
Virginia in farm lands on sandy soils, and Isley (1938), in eastern
Texas, classified it as a species of shallow soil. Like the northern
subspecies, bilituratus vulturnus is found in many less typical environ-
ments, such, for example, as the shale barrens of Virginia which
Gurney (1941) described as the habitat of M. impudicus Scudder.
Fox reported it quite scarce in the higher Appalachians, but our records
and those of Hebard (1945) show that it is frequent in clearings at
higher elevations. The following are among the altitudes cited on
labels of specimens examined: White Top Mountain, Va., 5,500 ft.;
Little Bald, Great Smoky National Park, Tenn., 4,800 ft.; Unaka
Mountains, Tenn., 3,500 ft.
As to food, Isley (1938) found that bilituratus vulturnus (reported
as mexicanus) “selected rather widely among monocotyledons and
dicotyledons showing a definite preference for crop plants.”
In a report on the sculpturing and other detailed features of grass-
hopper eggs by Tuck and Smith (1939), descriptions of mezicanus
eggs probably are attributable to bilituratus vulturnus because the
work was conducted mainly in eastern Kansas.
Regarding the seasonal occurrence of adults, the following early
and late dates from labels of specimens examined may be cited;
Jackson Co., Ohio, June 12, 1932; Vinton Co., Ohio, Nov. 24, 1936;
McNeill, Miss., May 8, 1925; Austin, Tex., April 15, 1956; College
Station, Tex., June 17, 1920, Nov. 20, 1924; Weatherford, Okla.,
36 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
June 6-7, 1938; Ft. Sill, Okla., Nov. 10, 1918; House Springs, Mo.,
Nov. 11, 1925; Clarksville, Tenn., Oct. 14, 1916. In Virginia, Fox
(1917) concluded from observations of adult prevalence that there
are two generations per year. He found that adults appear about
June 1, reach a peak of abundance, and then in late July decline in
numbers; about the middle of August he noted the appearance of a new
group of adults. In Kansas, Wilbur and Fritz (1940) recorded a peak
of abundance from the middle of June until late July; in 1934 there
was a fall peak of adults between October 6 and November 9.
Remarks: The name of this subspecies is from ‘“‘vulturnus ventus,”’
a Roman term for a south-southeast wind, chosen in allusion to the
distribution of this subspecies.
EXPLANATION OF FicuReE 10
a-e: Epiphallus in lateral view, males:
a: Melanoplus spretus, Neotype.
b: M. bruneri: 1, from Ft. McLeod, Alberta, Canada; 2, from Mt. Moriah,
Nev.
c: M. borealis borealis, Nachvak Bay, Labrador, Canada.
d: M. borealis stupefactus, holotype of latifercula.
M. borealis utahensis, holotype.
ercus of females:
M. mexicanus, Cuernavaca, Mex.
M. bilituratus bilaturatus, Hogeland, Mont.
M. bilituratus defectus, San Carlos Indian Reservation, Ariz.
M. devastator, Gazelle, Calif.
M. bilituratus defectus, Chandler, Ariz.
M. bruneri, Isle Royale, Mich.
M. borealis borealis, lectotype of septenirionalts.
m: M. borealis stupefactus, Mineral Co., Colo.
n-p: Left dorsal valve of ovipositor:
n: WM. bilituratus bilituratus, Hogeland, Mont.
o: M. bilituratus oulturnus, allotype.
p: M. devastator, Gazelle, Calif.
q: Female apical abdominal structures of M. mexicanus, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
r-t: Left dorsal valve of ovipositor:
r: M. bruneri, Isle Royale, Mich.
s: M. borealis borealis, lectotype of sepientrionalts.
t: M. borealis palaceus, allotype.
u-x: Apex of male subgenital plate in posterior view:
u: M. bilituratus defectus, Chandler, Ariz.
vo: M. spretus: 1, from Pueblo, Colo., July 8-9, 1877; 2, from Argentine Pass,
Colo., July 16, 1877.
w: M. bilituratus bilituratus, Poplar, Mont.
x: M. devastator: 1, from Merced River, Yosemite National Park, Calif.;
2, from Tehachapi, Calif.; 3, from Alpine, Calif.; 4, from Grant’s Pass,
Oreg.
8
fm: Left
oO
m See FT SH
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS
ome BN
| 2 3 é
Ficure 10.—Explanation on facing page.
38 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Melanoplus bilituratus defectus Scudder, new combination
Ficures 2,1,1; 3,d,h; 6; 7,c,e; 8,2; 10,h,j,u; 16,0; Phares 2,A,B,C; 4,A.
Melanoplus defectus Scudder, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. 36 (154), pp. 20, 32,
1897; Proc. U. S. Nat. Museum, vol. 20, pp. 132, 177-178, pl. 12, fig. 6,
1897. (One male, one female, Grand Junction, Mesa Co., Colo.) Lectotype,
designated by Rehn and Hebard (1912, p. 80): Male from Grand Junction,
Colo. (ANSP).
Hebard (1929, p. 390) placed defectus as a synonym of brunera,
but the aedeagus of the lectotype shows that it belongs to the Grand
Junction population of bilituratus, here considered to be encompassed
within the limits of the southwestern subspecies. The lectotype is
small, with a body length of 19.5 mm. The tegmina fail by about
2 mm. to reach the tips of the hind femora. The dorsal valve of
the aedeagus is poorly sclerotized and pale, but is comparable in
shape to other specimens of this subspecies from southwestern Colo-
rado. The optimum development of bilituratus defectus occurs in
the central and southern portions of Arizona and New Mexico, and
it is unfortunate that the type locality is not within that area. The
lectotype shows closer relationship to the optimum development of
bilituratus defectus than it does to bilituratus bilituratus. The term
“intermediate” as used for this subspecies (including the explanation
of fig. 6), connotes specimens showing intergradation between the
optimum population of bilituratus defectus and bilituratus bilituratus.
From a nomenclatural point of view those specimens are not inter-
mediates comparable to those discussed elsewhere in this paper
because the type locality of bilituratus defectus is outside the area of
optimum development.
The most distinctive character of bilituratus defectus is the dorsal
valve of the aedeagus, which in specimens of optimum development
has the anterior margin (x of fig. 3,d) concave and the lateral flap-
like area (y) wide and with a sinuate margin (z). In some speci-
mens, mainly those intermediate with bilituratus bilituratus (fig. 3,f),
the lateral portion is not typically developed. (Also see second
paragraph below.) ‘The male cercus usually is about as in figure
7,e-2), though occasionally it is much broader (fig. 7,e-3). Especially
in intermediate specimens from Baker, Nev., the cercus is narrower.
VARIATION: The size of 13 representative males, measured in milli-
meters, varies in pronotal length from 3.5 to 5.7 (av. 4.3), in length
of hind femur from 9.8 to 14.5 (av. 12.4), and for length of tegmen
from 11.5 to 22.5 (av. 17.8). Eight measured females vary in pro-
notal length from 4.5 to 6.0 (av. 5.4), for length of hind femur from
13.0 to 16.0 (av. 14.5), and for length of tegmen from 17.5 to 23.4
(av. 21.0). Specimens from Ft. Wingate, N. Mex., and Kaibab,
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 39
Ariz., are small and dark, in marked contrast to the richly colored,
more yellowish specimens reared on winter mustard at Tempe, Ariz.
In average specimens of bilituratus defectus the tegmen extends about
4 mm. beyond the hind femur. With the exception of material noted
in the next paragraph, extremes among specimens examined are a
male from Kaibab, Ariz., and one from Phoenix, Ariz., in which the
tegmen extends 1.5 and 7 mm., respectively.
Six males and 11 females from several Arizona localities are so
long-winged and, in the case of males, have so unusual an aedeagus
that they are discussed separately in order that all the data will be
assembled for future reference if importance should become attached
to them as a distinct population. The aedeagus in lateral view
(figs. 2,/; 3,h) has the dorsal valve extending anteriorly and with
little development of a concave lateral surface; however, the dorsal
valve differs slightly in length and shape, and in one specimen the
anterior apical margin is very weakly recurved in a suggestion of
bilituratus defectus; another specimen (from Tumacacori National
Monument) has a second right dorsal valve present, which approaches
that of bihturatus defectus, although the left one and the other right
one are essentially as figured. It appears that the aedeagus in this
series is abnormal or not fully developed, and that the specimens are
bilituratus defectus. Fred Skoog, collector of the Chandler specimens,
has informed us that they were taken among bilituratus defectus
where the population was 50 to 75 per square yard in an alfalfa
field, and 500 to 1000 along the margins of the field. The few un-
usually long-winged specimens found by him had only recently
become adult, and their somewhat teneral condition may have had
a bearing on the shape of the aedeagus. Other genitalic characters
of these specimens fall within the normal variation of bzlituratus
defectus; the following figures illustrate them: 7,c; 8,7,; 10,7,w; 16,6.
The general appearance of the above specimens is as shown (plates
2,c;4,A). Gurney (1953, pl. 7, fig. c) previously illustrated one of
the females from Chandler, and Barnes (1956) referred to long-winged
Arizona specimens; both authors applied the name M. mezxicanus
mexicanus. The lengths of the tegmen and hind femur of these
specimens are, respectively, as follows: Males, 26.0-31.0 (av. 27.90),
13.3-14.8 (av. 14.02); females, 27.0-33.5 (av. 29.67), 15.0-17.2 (av.
15.93). The extremes and averages of the distance from apex of
hind femur to apex of tegmen are as follows: Male, 9.0-14.0 (av. 11.28) ;
female, 8.0-13.5 (av. 10.04).
The following label data accompany this long-winged material (all
from Arizona): Casa Grande, swept from alfalfa, July 20, 1951,
N. J. Nerney (1); Chandler, lush irrigated alfalfa, May 1945,
F. Skoog (2c, 89); Tempe, alfalfa, Aug. 31, 1938, O. L. Barnes
40 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
(10%); Tempe, swept from alfalfa, June 8, 1950, N. J. Nerney (19);
Theba, on alfalfa, Oct. 26, 1939, O. L. Barnes (1); Tumacacori
National Monument (Pendleton Ranch), Sept. 9, 1939, E. R. Tinkham
(1°); Yuma, alfalfa, Aug. 2, 1938, O. L. Barnes (19); Yuma, alfalfa,
Nov. 11, 1936, O. L. Barnes (19).
Of 311 specimens of bilituratus defectus examined, only two (one
each from Las Vegas, N. Mex., and Lupton, Ariz.) have glaucous
hind tibiae; the others are red. However, 13 of 57 specimens which
are intermediate with bilituratus bilituratus have glaucous hind tibiae.
None of these intermediate specimens is as long-winged and large as
the most optimum specimens of bilituratus defectus. Several of the
intermediates from southern Colorado and northern New Mexico are
noticeably small and dark.
The distribution of males of bilituratus defectus examined is shown in
figure 6. The single Texas locality is Phantom Lake, Davis Moun-
tains.
BioLoGY AND ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE: This grasshopper is important
economically and is most injurious in irrigated areas (Ball, Tinkham,
et al., 1942; Harper, 1952). It is said by Harper not to have become
a pest in the Imperial Valley of California until 1915 when farming
there became extensive. Cultivated crops are injured more severely
than grazing areas.
Barnes (1955) compared five plants as food for bilituratus defectus
in cage studies in Arizona, and his paper should be consulted for
observations on mating, egg development, adult body dimensions,
and weights of adults, as influenced by diet. Two annual generations
usually are reported, and Barnes feels that a considerable difference
in average size of individuals representing the two generations probably
is due to the plants available as food. For instance, in 1944 the second
generation in the Yuma, Ariz., area developed almost exclusively on
dry alfalfa and Bermuda grass, and resulting adults were much smaller
than first generation adults. A comparable difference in adult size
at the San Carlos Indian Reservation, Ariz., was noted in the two
generations in 1953. First generation nymphal diet consisted mainly
of forbs, while the second generation had to develop mostly on grasses.
It may be significant that all of the especially long-winged specimens
discussed in detail, which bear habitat data, were associated with
alfalfa.
In southern California (Harper, 1952), bilituratus defectus first
hatches by March or early April; then the second generation occurs
in September and October. Some early and late dates on labels of
adults examined are as follows: Yuma, Ariz., Jan. 5, 1937; Bard,
Calif., Jan. 19, 1937; Yuma, Calif., Apr. 17, 1942; Saugus, Calif.,
Oct. 19, 1950; Zion National Park, Utah, June 18, 1953; same, Sept.
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 41
5, 1926; Peeples Valley, Ariz., Oct. 2, 1936; Chino Valley, Ariz.,
Nov. 23, 1936; Roll, Ariz., Nov. 12, 1943; same, Dec. 1, 1936.
Altitudinally, bilituratus defectus ranges in distribution from about
sea level in Imperial Co., Calif., to 11,800 feet on Mt. Charleston, Nev.
Other high altitudes indicated on labels of specimens examined are
the following: Magdalena Mts., N. Mex., 7,100 ft.; Lee Canyon,
Spring Mountains, Nev., 8,600 ft.; Rim Rock Peak, Sandia Mts.,
N. Mex., 9,500-10,000 ft. The specimens from high elevations
average somewhat smaller than specimens of optimum development
from low elevations, and they are relatively dark in color, but in
general they are not distinctive.
Melanoplus devastator Scudder
Ficures, l,e;, 2,4;:3,i;.7,h,k;.8,l;.9,h;/10,i,p,2; 14; Puate 3,8,c.
Melanoplus devastator Scudder, Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., vol. 19, pp. 287, 288,
1878. (Males, females, Shasta Valley, Sissons, Sausalito, Calif.; Lake Tahoe,
Reno, Glen Brook, Nev.; Beaver Brook, Morrison, Colo.) Lectotype, here
designated: Male labeled ‘‘Sept. 1, 1874, Sauzalito, Cal.,”’ ‘““Scudder’s Type,”
“Mel. devastator typicalis Scudder’s Type, 1895,’ ‘Sc. reference Rev.
Melanopli 1897, p. 198,” “‘M. devastator Scudd. Cab. 8. H. Scudder.” (ANSP).
Sausalito is one of the original localities mentioned by Scudder (1878b),
who said that the form named M., d. typicalis ‘‘best represents the original
types of the species when first described,’ and this specimen is one so identified
by him.
Melanoplus ater Scudder, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. 36 (154), pp. 22, 32, 1897;
Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, pp. 133, 194-195, pl. 13, fig. 2, 1897 (two males,
3 females, San Francisco, Calif.). Lectotype, designated by Rehn and Hebard
(1912, p. 80): Male (ANSP).
Melanoplus consanguineus Scudder, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. 36 (154),
pp. 21, 32, 1897; Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, pp. 133, 192-193, pl. 12, fig.
10, 1897 (male, female, Sacramento Co., Calif., Sonora Co. in plate explana-
tion, p. 409, error for Sonoma Co.; see Rehn and Hebard, 1912, p. 80). New
synonymy. Lectotype, designated by Rehn and Hebard (1912): Male
(USNM).
Melanoplus diminutus Scudder, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. 36 (154), pp. 21, 32,
1897; Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, pp. 133, 190-191, pl. 12, fig. 9, 1897
(males, females, San Francisco, Calif.; Monterey, Calif.). New synonymy.
Lectotype, designated by Rehn and Hebard (1912, p. 80): Male from Mon-
terey, Calif. (MCZ).
Melanoplus uniformis Scudder, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. 36 (154), pp. 22, 32,
1897; Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, pp. 133, 201-202, pl. 13, fig. 9, 1897
(males, females, five California localities). New synonymy. Lectotype,
designated by Rehn and Hebard (1912, p. 80): Male from Sacramento,
Calif. (USNM).
3 Labels such as this one, with ‘‘Scudder’s Type, 1895’ printed, were affixed to many of the specimens
studied by Scudder in connection with his revision (1897b). Species described by other authors, as well as
those by Scudder, and, where series were available, more than one specimen of the same species, were So
treated. The principal function of this label today is to indicate a specimen studied by Scudder himself,
and one presumably considered by him to be typical of the species named.
42 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Melanoplus virgatus Scudder, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. 36 (154), pp. 22, 32,
1897; Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, pp. 133, 199-201, pl. 13, fig. 8, 1897
(males, females, six California localities). Lectotype, designated by Rehn
and Hebard (1912, p. 80): Male from Siskiyou Co., Calif. (MCZ).
Melanoplus devastator affinis Scudder, Proc. U. 8. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, p. 199, pl. 13,
fig. 6, 1897 (males, Sierra, Sacramento, and Los Angeles Counties, Calif.,
also “California, S. Henshaw.’’). Lectotype, here designated: Male labeled
“Cal. (Ricksecker) 8. Henshaw,” ‘‘Mel. devastator affinis Scudder’s Type
1895,” and figured by Scudder, 1897b (MCZ).
Melanoplus devastator conspicuus Scudder, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, p. 199,
pl. 13, fig. 7, 1897 (males, Sacramento, El Dorado, Amador, and Merced
Counties, Calif.). Lectotype, here designated: Male labeled ‘Clarkson,
Eldorado Co. Cal. 14/8, 85, Type No. 1160, U. S. N. M., Mel. devastator
conspicuus Scudder’s Type, 1895’”” (USNM). (We have been unable to
locate a Clarkson in El Dorado County, and the label may have been in error
for Clarksona, Amador County, which is nearby. The male from Sacra-
mento, Calif., figured by Scudder has not been found. El Dorado County is
the second locality mentioned.)
Melanoplus devastator obscurus Scudder, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, pp. 198-
199, pl. 13, figs. 3, 4, 1897 (males, San Francisco, Calif.; Sierra, Placer, Marin,
Sacramento, El Dorado, Alameda, Siskiyou, and Los Angeles Counties, Calif.).
Lectotype, here designated: Male labeled “‘Sissons Cal., Drawn, S. H. Scudder
Coll, Type 15439, Mel. devastator obscurus Scudder’s Type, 1895” and
figured by Scudder, 1897b (MCZ).
Melanoplus devastator typicalis Scudder, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, p. 199,
pl. 13, fig. 5, 1897 (males, ‘‘nearly every county . . . from Shasta to San
Diego and from Marin to Sierra,’”’ Calif.). (The sexes and number of speci-
mens of this and the previous three entities were not given by Scudder, but
male specimens were figured. In each case both sexes were before him, as
shown by preserved specimens.) Lectotype, here designated: Male labeled
“Tighe Calif.. Drawn, S. H. Scudder Coll, Type 15441, Mel. devastator
typicalis Scudder’s Type, 1895” and figured by Scudder (1897b) (MCZ).
Scudder listed Dr. Edward Palmer as the collector of the Tighe
specimen. We have been unable to find Tighe on available maps, and
for the information that Tighe was about 8 miles east of Ramona,
Calif., are indebted to Rogers McVaugh, a botanist who has made a
study of Palmer collecting localities. This location, about 45 miles
northeast of San Diego, apparently was a ranch. Palmer’s un-
published notes indicate that he was there July 5-6, 1875. For a
biography and sketch of Palmer’s travels, see Safford (Pop. Sci.
Monthly, vol. 78, pp. 341-354, 1911) and McVaugh’s (1956) recent
book, wherein (p. 333) the locality is listed as Tigh(e)’s (Ranch or
Station).
All the lectotypes mentioned have been examined, in each case
including the aedeagus and epiphallus, and they are considered to
represent a single species, (4. devastator Scudder. Kirby (1910) placed
d. affinis, d. conspicuus, d. obscurus, and d. typicalis as synonyms of
devastator, and Caudell (1915) did likewise for virgatus and affirmed
the synonymy of d. affinis and d. typicalis. He also considered
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 43
consanguineus a synonym of diminutus. M. d. affinis should not be
confused with M. affinis, described by Scudder (1897b, p. 171),
which preoccupies it. The types of ater, diminutus, and d. obscurus
are small, very dark individuals; those of uniformis, virgatus, and
d. conspicuus are noticeably large and yellowish; consanguineus is
relatively small and moderately dark; d. affinis is medium-sized and
yellowish; devastator and d. typicalis are medium-sized and moderately
dark.
DescriIpTivE Notes: A medium-sized, usually fully winged member
of the mezxicanus group. Head with dorsal carinae of vertex about as
in bilituratus bilituratus; mesosternal hump absent or weakly de-
veloped in male, absent in female.
MALE GENITALIA: Cercus elongate and slender for group, with a
characteristic preapical knob extending ventrally and mesally on the
mesal surface (fig. 7,k), typically as in figure 7,h-1, sometimes pro-
portionally shorter, often with a small tooth near the ventroposterior
angle (fig. 7,h-2,3); furculae sometimes more divergent than illus-
trated (fig. 9,h-2); subgenital plate weakly to moderately upturned
(pl. 3,8), in posterior view (fig. 10,7) with twin apices usually distinct,
rarely (fig. 10,7-4) scarcely developed; aedeagus (figs. 2,k; 3,7) with
dorsal valve lightly sclerotized, rather thin and parchment-like, the
anterior margin with narrow fold, in dry specimens a basal lobe along
ventroanterior margin usually evident; when dry the dorsal valve often
is more concave and the margin is more recurved than when preserved
wet; accessory lobe medium-sized to large for group; epiphallus
(fig. 8,/-3,9) distinctive in that lophus is angulate in lateral view
near apex, the angulation correlated with more or less acute apex in
dorsal view (fig. 8,/-1,2).
FEMALE GENITALIA: Cercus (fig. 10,7) relatively acute for group,
not so robust and blunt as in bilituratus bilituratus; dorsal valve of
ovipositor with ‘‘scoop”’ well developed.
VaRIATION: The size of 10 representative males, measured in
millimeters, varies in pronotal length from 3.7 to 5.3 (av. 4.3), in length
of hind femur from 9.7 to 15.2 (av. 11.4), and in length of tegmen from
12.0 to 21.8 (av. 14.8). Seven measured females vary in pronotal
length from 3.6 to 5.9 (av. 4.8), in length of hind femur from 10.0
to 15.5 (av. 12.8), and in length of tegmen from 10.6 to 23.1 (av.
17.5). There is great variation in size, and small specimens are
frequently encountered in the San Francisco, Calif., area, and in
Oregon and Washington. The tegmina of the smaller specimens
usually do not surpass the apex of the hind femur, and in some
specimens they are as much as 2 mm. short of the femoral apex.
In larger specimens with optimum development the tegmina fre-
quently exceed the hind femora by about 3 mm,
44 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
DistriBuTion: Figure 14 shows the distribution of devastator as
known to the authors. However, uncertainty concerning identifica-
tions in the group during the past has been responsible for early
published records which pointed to a much wider distribution. Both
Essig (1926, p. 81) and Harper (1952) include Arizona in the dis-
tribution, but Hebard (1935b, p. 304) stated that devastator does not
occur there. Buckell (1922, p. 31) included devastator in his British
Columbia list, based on a Vancouver Island record by Caudell.
Caudell (1908, p. 77) recorded devastator conspicuus from Wellington,
British Columbia, and a manuscript note written by him in 1926
indicated that the record was based on a female specimen. The
specimen, a female with red hind tibiae, is in the U. 8S. National
Museum, and is bilituratus bilituratus.
Male specimens of Melanoplus devastator have been examined from
the localities shown in figure 14.
BioLoGy AND ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE: When Scudder (1878b)
originally described devastator, he stated that it probably ‘Ss the
source of most of the damage to crops in California,” and it frequently
has been of much importance there. The fullest early account is
Coquillett’s (1892) report on the 1891 infestation, which includes
biological notes. Woodworth (1902) stated that devastator was one
of the two most destructive California grasshoppers in 1901. Brief
later accounts are by Essig (1926) and Harper (1952). Fulton (1930,
p. 634) referred to devastator as one of the ‘‘more strictly prairie species”
of the Willamette Valley of western Oregon and universally present
there during the proper season.
A concise summary of the biology and economic importance of
devastator by Wilson (1947) points out that it is the dominant species
on much of the semiarid range in California, and that preventing mass
migrations from natural habitats to cultivated crops is one of the
critical control measures, in addition to preventing serious damage to
range forage. Nymphs inhabit much of the range and feed on legumes,
alfilarias, bromes, and hordeums, in the order named, as long as they
remain succulent. Wilson, to whose excellent summary the reader is
referred for more detailed information on habits and seasonal occur-
rence, commented as follows on the physiological distinctness of
devastator:
By the second week of July the species has largely reached the adult stage. To
the casual observer the adults resemble the lesser migratory grasshopper (M.
mexicanus Sauss.). However, field and microscopic observations show that these
two species differ in external anatomy, habitat, and seasonal history. M. devasta-
tor is naturally found on the range, whereas M. mexicanus is found in California
and Nevada, largely, if not entirely, in irrigated alfalfa fields. Dissections have
shown that, unlike M. mexicanus and many of the other economic species that
begin oviposition within 10 days after reaching the adult stage, M. devastator has a
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 45
preoviposition period ranging from 90 to 176 days, during which no ovarian
development or copulation takes place. The breaking of this diapause, or period
of arrested development, apparently depends on temperature and food. Cool
fall weather, with rains sufficient to germinate the seed of annual plants, appears
to be the determining factor in breaking the diapause.
Middlekauff (1958) more recently summarized observations on the
bionomics of devastator.
The following are some early and late capture dates noted on
specimens examined: Catirornia: San Bernardino, May 14; Kern
Lake, Kern Co., May 22; San Luis Obispo, June 14; Monterey Co.,
Oct. 31; Roseville, Nov. 26; Red Bluff, Dec. 2. Wasuineron:
Tacoma, Sept. 25.
Melanoplus bruneri Scudder
FieureEs 1,9; 2,a,b; 3,k,l; 7,2; 9,a; 10,6,k,r; 11,a; 12; 13; 16,h; Puare 3,a.
Melanoplus brunert Scudder, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. 36 (154), pp. 19, 32,
1897; Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, pp. 132, 164-166, pl. 11, fig. 7, 1897
(males, females, 12 localities in Alberta, Montana, Nebraska, Colorado, and
Washington). Lectotype designated by Rehn and Hebard (1912, p. 79): Male
labeled ‘‘Ft. McLeod, B. A. Aug. 82’’ (near southwest corner of Alberta;
itinerary described by Bruner, 1883, who was given as collector by Scudder,
1897b, p. 166) (ANSP).
Melanoplus excelsus Scudder, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. 36 (154), pp. 19, 32,
1897; Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, pp. 132, 166-167, pl. 11, fig. 9, 1897
(males, females, above timber, 11,000 to 13,000 ft., Mt. Lincoln, Park Co.,
Colo.). Lectotype designated by Rehn and Hebard (1912, p. 79): Male
(MCZ).
Melanoplus alaskanus Scudder, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. 36 (154), pp. 20, 32,
1897; Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, pp. 132, 169-170, pl. 12, fig. 1, 1897
(2¢°, 19, Alaska; Spilmacheen, British Columbia). Lectotype designated
by Rehn and Hebard (1912, p. 79): Male from Alaska (USNM).
Hebard (1929, p. 390) considered M4. defectus Scudder and M. di-
midipennis Bruner synonyms of M. bruneri, but the types indicate
that defectus is a subspecies of bilituratus, and dimidipennis a synonym
of bilituratus bilituratus.
Hebard (1928, p. 284; 1929, p. 390) indicated the synonymy of
excelsus, which is borne out by the lectotype. The posterior surface
of the subgenital plate is dimpled, but not vertically grooved nor
incised at the apex, a condition included in the variation of bruneri,
and the aedeagus is typical of bruneri.
Walker (1910, 1920) indicated the synonymy of alaskanus, and the
lectotypes of alaskanus and brunert demonstrate that synonymy.
Earlier, Walker (1906) had recorded alaskanus from Vernon, British
Columbia, with the identity questioned. In 1909 Walker discussed
the variation shown by an Ontario series, as correlated with the
differences in Scudder’s descriptions of the two supposed species
(alaskanus and bruneri) and he then reduced alaskanus to a variety of
A6 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VoL. 110
brunert. Pettit and McDaniel (1918) treated the Michigan population
as adlaskanus. Essig (1926, p. 81) listed alaskanus as a synonym of
bruneri. Hebard (1925a, p. 114) questioned the synonymy indicated
by Walker, and later said (1928, pp. 281-282) he believed alaskanus
to be a geographic race of mexicanus if nominal recognition is war-
ranted. Rehn (1952) agreed with Hebard’s opinion.
Because of the difference of opinion concerning alaskanus, it may be
helpful to discuss the type in more detail. It is the specimen selected
by Rehn and Hebard, and was received at the U. S. National Museum
on Feb. 29, 1892, from T. C. Mendenhall of the U. S. Coast and Geo-
detic Survey. Accession records show that the material was collected
by J. E. McGrath during an expedition which was active along the
Alaskan Boundary during September 1890-May 1891. McGrath
(1893) has described the general experiences of the party which he
led up the Yukon River, and (p. 185) has commented about the plenti-
ful insects found near the river in summer. It appears that the type
specimen was collected along the Yukon River somewhere between
Ft. Yukon and the 141st Meridian.
A male of bruneri, collected in 1948 near Fairbanks, Alaska, a
locality at about the same latitude as the intersection of the Yukon
River and 141st Meridian, confirms the presence of this species in
Alaska, so there is no reason to doubt the source of the alaskanus
lectotype. Hebard did not examine the aedeagus of the lectotype and
so did not have this evidence which shows agreement with brunert.
Although bruneri, excelsus, and alaskanus were all described in the
same publication, the action of the first revisers (Hebard, 1928, for
excelsus; Walker, 1910, for alaskanus) establishes the precedent of
using bruneri as the valid name of this species. It is much the best
known of the three names, and has page priority in Scudder (1897b).
Though not required, page priority was recommended in the 1953
Copenhagen Decisions of Zoological Nomenclature when other con-
ditions are equal.
Descriptive Notes: A usually medium-sized, fully winged member of
the mexicanus group, most closely related to bilituratus, from which it
differs mainly in male genitalia. Mesosternal hump variable (fig.
1,9), averaging fully as prominent in male as in bilituratus, absent in
female; tegmina usually reaching slightly beyond tip of abdomen,
sometimes short of it. Females not always separable from bilituratus,
but in any given locality where both species occur brunert females
usually more robust and often shorter-winged; males usually recog-
nizable by cercus and subgenital plate, but in doubtful cases the dorsal
valve of aedeagus of bruneri is highly distinctive in its much more
expansive and thin, striated, conformation.
MALE GENITALIA: Cercus (fig. 7,7) variable, usually about as in
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 47
figure 7,i-2 more incurved along dorsal margin and more evenly
rounded along ventroposterior margin than frequent in bilituratus;
supra-anal plate (fig. 9,¢@) elongate, lateral elevations prominent;
furculae usually reaching to middle of supra-anal plate or approxi-
mately so; subgenital plate in lateral view with apical portion strongly
upturned, sometimes rather abruptly so (fig. 16,4), often superficially
accentuated by upward curvature of abdomen; posterior view of sub-
genital plate usually as in figures 11,a-1 or 11,a-4, with apical margin
entire and posterior surface grooved, frequently apical margin is
dimpled (fig. 11,a-2), or there are well formed twin apices (fig. 11,a-3),
and rarely margin is squarish and irregular (fig. 11,¢-5). Aedeagus
with main stem relatively short; dorsal valve moderately sclerotized,
thin, often appearing almost parchment-like, large and marked with
striations; in dorsal view a triangular projection (x in fig. 3,k) of the
well-sclerotized dorsal rim of the dorsal valve is distinctive; accessory
lobe large for group; epiphallus as in figure 10,0.
FEMALE GENITALIA: Cercus (fig. 10,k) relatively short and blunt,
the dorsal margin often somewhat irregular; ovipositor with ‘‘scoop”’
of dorsal valve (fig. 10,7) strongly concave.
Variation: The size of nine representative males, measured in
millimeters, varies in pronotal length from 3.6 to 5.1 (av. 4.6), in
length of hind femur from 9.0 to 13.0 (av. 11.9), and in length of
tegmen from 12.0 to 19.5 (av. 16.6). Seven measured females vary
in pronotal length from 3.6 to 6.0 (av. 4.8), in length of hind femur
from 9.6 to 16.0 (av. 13.1), and in length of tegmen from 11.5 to 20.7
(av. 17.1). The smallest specimens seen are from Mt. Moriah, Nev.,
the largest from Michigan.
Cotoration: General coloration about as in bilituratus, varying
from pale brown to blackish; hind femur usually with three external
and dorsal dark bands, poorly developed in pale individuals; hind
tibia varying from pale greenish yellow to red, usually pinkish to red.
DistRiIBuTION: Several records of bruneri add significantly to the
distribution based on male specimens examined (figs. 12, 13). Fulton
(1930) reported it from Grant’s Pass, Oreg.; Hebard (1925a) listed
Nipigon and Dwight (Ontario), Norrie and Oregon (Wisconsin),
Gordon (Nebraska), and Englewood (South Dakota); Hebard (1932b)
reported a specimen from Onawa, Iowa; and Hebard (1935a, p. 68)
said that Beulah and Agua Fria Park are eastern limits in New
Mexico. Stehr (1936) gave several Minnesota records which supple-
mented those of Hebard (1932b; 1934a).
BioLoGy AND ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE: On the high montane ranges
of the Northwestern States and western Canada, bruneri is injurious
to grazing areas. There have been fairly frequent references to the
importance of bruneri in western Canada (Canad. Insect Pest Rev.,
48 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
vol. 23, p. 2, 1945; vol. 24, p. 348, 1946; vol. 28, p. 255, 1950; vol. 33,
pp. 10, 341, 1955). Treherne and Buckell (1924, p. 26) described it
and Bradynotes chilcotinae Hebard (now Buckellacris chilcotinae
chilcotinae) as the most common and injurious grasshoppers “‘in the
lightly timbered areas of the summer range in the Chilcotin section
(of B. C.) during 1920 and 1921.” In 1921 A. G. Ruggles reported
to the Insect Pest Survey, U. S. Department of Agriculture, that
damage by bruneri was occurring at Grand Rapids, Minn. The
frequency of its capture on upland ranges in Montana suggests its
importance there, as do comments on its abundance by Pepper,
et al. (1953).
An unusual infestation of bruneri occurred on Mt. Moriah, Nev., in
the 1930’s. Material collected Sept. 2, 1937, and Aug. 16, 1939, is in
the U. S. National Museum, and data on the infestation have been
obtained from Lee M. Burge, Division of Plant Industry, Nevada
Department of Agriculture. Mt. Moriah is located about 35 miles
east of Ely, Nev., just north of Baker. The infested range is a large
table area at an elevation of about 11,000 feet, bearing a valuable
stand of bunch grasses and grazed over by sheep. Injurious popula-
tions of bruneri existed there in 1936-1938. During the first 5 days
of September 1937, poison bait was carried up to the sheep range by
pack mules and spread by hand. Later in 1937 a survey indicated
that approximately 2,000 acres carried a population of 20 adults per
square yard. A visit made by Nevada entomologists during 1938
coincided with a hail storm, and it was estimated that half of the
large population then existing was killed by the hail and cold.
No detailed food-plant studies of bruneri have been reported, but
the general ecology is rather well known. Morse (1908) described
the species (as alaskanus) as the dominant Melanoplus on Isle Royale,
Mich., and recorded it from clearings, along trails, rock ridges, the
EXPLANATION OF Ficure 11
Posterior view of male subgenital plate (except ¢(4), which is ventroposterior view).
a: Melanoplus bruneri: 1, 2 from Ft. McLeod, Alberta, Canada (2 specimens); 3, 4 from
Mt. Moriah, Nev. (2 specimens); 5, from Crook Co., Wyo.
b: M. borealis stupefactus: 1, lectotype; 2, 4, 5, 6, from Mineral Co., Colo. (4 specimens);
3, from Los Pinos, Colo.; 7, from Silverton, Colo.
c: M. borealis borealis: 1, from Nain, Labrador, Canada; 2, 3, from Cummington, Mass.
(2 specimens).
d: M. borealis palaceus: 1, 2, 4, from Lakeview area, Mont. (3 specimens); 3, topotype;
5, holotype (x, rectangular vertical area).
e: M. borealis utahensis: 1, holotype; 2, from Big Cottonwood Canyon, Utah; 3, from
Ogden, Utah; 4, ventroposterior view of same specimen as 3.
‘: Intermediate between M. borealis utahensis and M. borealis palaceus, 3 miles north of
Mantua, Utah.
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS
Ficure 11.—Explanation on facing page.
477119 —59——__4
49
50 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
‘ } 9 ?
rs \ /
—& y - \
Pye Sia
VI
Ficure 12.—Distribution of male specimens of Melanoplus bruneri examined from Alaska
and Canada.
beach heath zone, and other environments. Hebard (1925a, p. 114)
stated that in the United States bruneri is strictly sylvan, living in
brushy forest undergrowth, and that this contrasts with the preferred
habitat in the Chilcotin District, British Columbia. In the latter
area Treherne and Buckell reported that bruneri normally lives
“among rank-growing grasses and plants growing under the aspen
poplar groves which often form belts separating the open range from
the timbered hills,” also that it sometimes advances into open glades
and small mountain meadows where vegetation is thick and green.
Probably on the basis of these observations, Buckell (1921), in a
summary of ecological preferences of Chilcotin Orthoptera, classified
brunert as a semi-sylvan species which extends into the geophilous
campestrian area where the open range adjoins the forest. The
described Chilcotin habitat seems comparable to the Lake Upsilon,
N. Dak., habitat where Hubbell (1922) found bruneri “quite common
in a dry clearing covered with low bushes and shrubs of various kinds
(Corylus rostrata, young aspens, willows, birches, etc.) and tall her-
baceous plants such as fireweed and goldenrod, interspersed with
small, grassy areas.” In the prairie provinces of Canada the habits
of bruneri are similar to those reported by Buckell (1921). In the
Cypress Hills plateau of southeastern Alberta, as well as in the foot-
hills of western Alberta, where the open grasslands are replaced rather
suddenly by coarse plants, low shrubs, and aspen poplar leading to
the evergreen forest, bruneri just as suddenly replaces bilituratus as
the dominant species. Similarly, grassy clearings within the forest
margin in the Prince Albert-Whitefox area of Saskatchewan are
51
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS
“SaTPEOO] saqvIg peru) wWory pouruexs tusundq Ssnpdouvjayy Jo suauutoads aye Jo uornqiysiq—¢] AUNTY
Br
52 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
populated mostly by bilituratus while the margins of those clearings
support bruneri. Hebard (1930) remarked on the very different
habitat preferences of bruneri and bilituratus (mexicanus), and this
distinction was also brought out by Handford (1946, p. 172). The
‘rather hot and dry valley fields” where Fulton (1930) found brunerz
in Oregon probably were adjacent to sylvan conditions. Specimens
of bruneri (10 o’, 9 9) in the Philadelphia collections, from Red Banks
in Logan Canyon, Utah, apparently are those referred to by Hebard
(1936b, p. 173) as M. utahensis, said to be abundant in areas of
“cow cabbage” (Wyethia amplexicaulis Nutt.)
Nymphs of bruneri have been illustrated by Handford (1946), who
found that they resembled darker nymphs, at least, of dbilituratus
bilituratus (~mezxicanus) in every respect.
In northern Michigan adults of brunert are not abundant until the
beginning of August (Hebard, 1909). It has been suggested (Canad.
Insect Pest Rev., vol. 33, p. 10, 1955) that since the 1954 outbreak
in parts of British Columbia seemed related to one in 1952, while the
1953 infestation was light, the life cycle there may occupy two years.
Collection dates on the great majority of specimens examined are in
August and late July. Some of the more limital dates are as follows:
Francis Lake, British Columbia, July 5; Castleton, Utah, July 5;
Chilcotin, British Columbia, Aug .1; 37 miles southeast of Fairbanks,
Alaska, Sept. 1; Drain, Oreg., Sept. 11; Therma, N. Mex., Sept. 12;
Gallatin Canyon, Mont., Oct. 3.
Some of the altitudes (in feet) on labels of specimens examined are
as follows: Evergreen, Idaho, 3,600; Strawberry Mts., Oreg., 4,450;
McCall, Idaho, 5,000-5,050; Jackson Hole, Wyo., 6,500; Fishers Peak,
Colo., 7,000-8,000; Cascade Canyon, Teton National Park, Wyo.,
9,000; southwest base of Delano Peak, Utah, 10,000; Mt. Wheeler,
Ney., 10,000-10,600; Mt. Lincoln, Colo., 11,000—13,000.
Melancoplus spretus (Walsh)
Ficures 1,f; 2,n; 3,a; 7,6; 10,a,v; 14; 15,a,d; 16,a; Plate 2,p
Caloptenus spretus Walsh, Pract. Ent., vol. 2, p. 1, 1866 (Highland, Kansas).
Neotype here designated: Male labeled ‘‘Lawrence, Kans. June 18, 1877,
Geo. F. Gaumer’”’ (USNM).
Caloptenus spretus caeruleipes Cockerell, Entomologist, vol. 22, p. 127, 1889
(probably Glencoe, Nebr., where observations by Dodge (1878) presumably
were made).
The condition of the neotype is excellent, with colors well preserved
and all appendages present. The aedeagus and epiphallus have been
exposed as dry preparations still attached to the body (see figs.
3,a-2,3; 10,2). The subgenital plate and cercus are shown in figures
16,a-2 and 7,b-1. Measurements (in millimeters) are as follows:
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS a}
Length of body, 26.5; tegmen, 23.0; hind femur, 12.5; extent of
tegmen posterior to apex of hind femur, 9.0; pronotum, 4.6. The
E/F ratio (length of tegmen divided by length of hind femur; see
comments on p. 6) is 1.840. The general coloration is light brown,
the head with gena rather pale and postocular dark bar distinct;
antenna reddish brown; dorsum of occiput with broken, indistinct
longitudinal dark streaks; tegmen with dark flecks in basal half only;
hind femur with three transverse blackish bars (exclusive of knees)
primarily on mesal half of dorsal surface; hind tibia and tarsus pale
red, spines, claws, and apical half of spurs black.
Five additional males and one female examined bear the same data
as the neotype. The locality where the neotype was collected,
Lawrence (Douglas Co.), Kans., is about 65 miles south of the type
locality, Highland (Doniphan Co.), Kans. George F. Gaumer, the
collector of the neotype, was a special assistant to the U.S. Entomo- .
logical Commission who worked in Kansas in 1877. He has reported
(Gaumer, 1878) that on June 16, 1877, he observed locusts flying over
the Wakarusa River (which is about 3 miles south of Lawrence). He
observed them on June 18 also, and, though a precise locality is not
described, it can be inferred that the same general locality was
involved. The locusts were seen flying in a north-northeast direction,
and at 5 p.m. many specimens dropped to the ground. This informa-
tion published by Gaumer explains the probable background of the
historic specimen chosen as neotype.
Walsh (1866) did not give a formal description of spretus, though he
gave various characters and compared it to M. femur-rubrum, and he
attributed the specific name to Uhler, who Walsh said had given the
locust the name Caloptenus spretus without describing it. Since no
published proposal of the name by Uhler was made, the name dates
from Walsh. Walsh had specimens which were sent to him by
Prof. W.S. Robertson of the Indian Orphan Institute, Highland, Kans.
Since he did not consider that he was describing spretus as new, pos-
sibly specimens were not preserved, at any rate no such specimens
nor further references to them have been found, in spite of an examina-
tion of the principal historic collections of Melanoplus. In case
specimens were preserved in the Walsh collection, they probably
were destroyed in 1871, when the Walsh material was burned in the
great Chicago fire (Burks, 1953, p. 16). Since no type is known to
exist, in spite of efforts to locate one, selection of a neotype is advisable.
This is especially true because spretus is of great historic importance.
It has not been collected recently, and old specimens are scattered in
many collections, and eventually the number of good examples may
become scarce.
The name caeruleipes was proposed by Cockerell (1889) for the
VOL. 110
OF “SOT
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM
54
(I6BI)Aajry wor
Pajdopo snjaids
JO uol\Ngiaysig
x
OTT
uoibay Asosodway
(coioy juaudwuadqns —..—
uoibay juauowdag | "
snjaids we wt
JO,OISOABP ‘W + ‘Z| ‘BI4
area ay!
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 55
variety “‘of spretus with blue hind tibiae.”” He referred to material
reported by Dodge (1878), but no types are known to exist, and
probably none was set aside. It was previously reported (Riley, et al.,
1878, p. 47) that some specimens of spretus had blue hind tibiae, and
it appears clear that no nominal significance should be attached to
such individuals. Scudder (1897b, p. 185) placed caeruleipes Cockerell
in the synonymy of spretus, and Hebard (1925a, p. 113) referred to
the synonymy.
Melanoplus spretis—originally described in Acridiuwm and credited
to Uhler by Thomas (1865) but in reality described by Thomas him-
self because Uhler had published no description—is of uncertain
identity and the source of some confusion in the literature. No
type specimens of spretis were mentioned by Frison (1927) or Hebard
(1927). Riley, et al. (1878, pp. 43-44), stated that there must have
been some mistake in the description, and that the original speci-
mens of spretis were destroyed soon after the paper was written.
The name spretis occasionally has been used in the sense of the
Rocky Mountain grasshopper, as when Rehn (1900) recorded it
from Mexico, following which Hebard (1917; 1932a, p. 289) pointed
out the misidentification of mezxicanus. Scudder (1897b, p. 185)
treated spretis Thomas as a synonym of spretus Walsh, and Hebard
(1934b, p. 197) did likewise. Earlier, however, Hebard (1925a, p. 113)
considered spretis a synonym of atlanis Riley. He appears to have
overlooked the fact that spretis antedated atlanis by 11 years!
Thomas (1865) stated that spretis was quite common in Illinois,
which we believe was untrue of spretus, and it would seem that
Melanoplus bilituratus was involved. The measurements given by
Thomas apply fully as well to spretus as to Illinois specimens of
bilituratus, however. Thomas (1878) credited spretus (sic!) to him-
self and referred to the Illinois State Agricultural Report. Because
of uncertainties over the identity of spretis, and the confusion with
spretus if both names were to be retained for distinct populations, it
is best to treat Acridium spretis Thomas 1865 as unrecognizable.
Seudder (1878b) was the first to assign spretus to the genus
Melanoplus.
Descriptive notes: A large, long-winged member of the mezi-
canus group (pl. 2,p). Head with fastigium comparatively far in
advance of compound eyes; the dorsal carinae of vertex less prom-
inent and farther apart than in mezicanus; eyes less rounded and
bulging than in mezicanus; especially in male; pronotum (fig. 15,@)
with strangulate narrowing of sides in front of principal transverse
sulcus, this conspicuous on lower portions of lateral lobes; in lateral
view the principal sulcus lower than remainder of median carina;
mesosternal hump well developed in male, absent in female.
56 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
rE
se are SE ae ste cor ary
f bs Laat apace?
wel Kas eal
Se
Water fet ae
Ficure 15.—a, }, Dorsal view of pronotum, with grid to show extent of constriction: a, M.
Spretus, male, Pueblo, Colo.; b, M. bilituratus oulturnus, Wellington, Kans. c, d, Lateral
view of: c, M. bilituratus oulturnus, Wellington, Kans.; d, M. spretus, male, Pueblo, Colo.
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 5%
Mate GeEniTatia: Cercus (fig. 7,5) broad for group, the apex
oblique at ventral side; subgenital plate (fig. 16,@) strongly upturned,
twin apices (posterior view) well developed; aedeagus (figs. 2,n; 3,a)
with dorsal valve extending laterally more than anteriorly, and re-
curved dorsally and posteriorly, conspicuously concave on posterior
surface, the apex of valve (dorsally) membranous; accessory lobe
comparatively elongate; apex of aedeagus dorsally produced beyond
dorsal valve.
FEMALE genitalia: Cercus slightly more robust and blunt than in
mexicanus; dorsal valve of ovipositor with “scoop” well developed,
the dorsal shoulder at base angular.
CotoraTIon: General coloration relatively dark for group. Hind
femur with four dark transverse dorsal bands (including knee), inner
paginal area rich yellowish, occasionally tinged with pinkish, outer
paginal area yellowish to light brown, paler along ventral margin,
ventral surface yellowish, the outerhalf tinged with pink; hind tibia
usually red; tegmen with conspicuous blackish flecks; wing trans-
parent, with faint tinges of yellowish near base. (Brett, 1947, p. 33,
reported that of 100 specimens of spretus he examined in the Bruner
Collection, University of Nebraska, 85 percent had red hind tibiae
and 15 percent glaucous or pale hind tibiae.)
Variation: The size of 14 representative males, measured in milli-
meters, varies in pronotal length from 4.2 to 5.5 (av. 4.8), in hind
femur from 11.5 to 14.2 (av. 13.0), and in tegmen from 19.0 to 26.0
(av. 22.8). Seven measured females vary in pronotal length from
4.8 to 5.4 (av. 5.1), in hind femur from 13.2 to 15.2 (av. 14.2), and
in tegmen from 23.0 to 25.5 (av. 24.6). No correlation between size
differences and geographic distribution has been recognized.
The extent to which the tegmen extends posteriorly beyond the
apex of hind femur varies from 4.5 to 10 mm., with an average of
about 7 mm. for males examined. For females, extremes of 5, and
10, and an average of about 8 mm. occur.
Measurements by Riley, et al. (1878, pp. 47-49), are not compa-
rable to the present ones because the former concern the distances
that various body structures exceed others. Faure’s (1933) measure-
ments are expressed in averages only. His averages for length of
tegmen are higher than ours, perhaps because more distance at the
very base of the tegmen was included through not using the method
later recommended by the International’ Locust Conference (see p. 6
of the present paper).
Of the males seen, there is none with pale hind tibiae which may
not owe the lack of pigmentation to immersion in fluid. The hind
tibiae of two or three of the. females seem to be pale from original
coloration, though fading is suggested by some of the oldest specimens.
58 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Furculae vary from straight to markedly divergent. Very little
variation in the male cercus has been seen. The aedeagus seldom
varies much, except in appearance due to shriveling from drying. The
apical portion of the main stem shrivels considerably and often is
smaller and somewhat distorted when dry. The apical valve usually
is heavily and darkly sclerotized, extending decidedly more laterally
and posteriorly, like “horns,” in dry than wet preparations. In wet
preparations the apical membrane of the dorsal valve is much more
noticeable, decreasing the hornlike appearance. The dorsal valve
occasionally is well anterior of the apex of the main stem, but fre-
quently, especially in dry preparations, extends laterad of the apex.
The apex of the ventral valve sometimes extends out from the main
stem, but usually is tightly appressed to the anteriobasal portion of
the aedeagus. The accessory lobe usually shrivels and has little dis-
tinctive shape following drying.
DistriputTion: The map (fig. 14) shows the distribution of males
examined which have precise locality data. Males with only State
labels are from Montana and New Mexico, as well as from eight other
States and Provinces from which there are precise data. Females
examined which add significantly to the distribution shown by males
are from Taos Peak, N. Mex., only. The Permanent, Subpermanent,
and Temporary Regions (fig. 14) in the sense of the U. S. Entomolog-
ical Commission, are adapted from Riley (1891). Riley (1877) and
Riley, et al. (1880), also mapped the distribution of spretus. It was
frankly stated by Riley and his associates that various details as
presented on their maps were based on fragmentary data and so should
be taken as tentative only. Many early records of spretus are un-
supported by specimens, so there is no way of checking identifications.
It seems possible that some early Nevada records may be attributable
EXPLANATION OF FicurE 16
Subgenital plate of male, in lateral view.
Melanoplus spretus: 1, from Argentine Pass, Colo., July 16, 1877; 2, neotype.
M. bilituratus defectus, Casa Grande, Ariz.
M. borealis stupefactus, Los Pinos, Colo.
M. borealis borealis: 1, from Cummington, Mass.; 2, from Churchill, Manitoba, Canada;
3, from Pikes Peak, Colo.
e: M. borealis palaceous: 1, holotype; 2, topotype; 3, from Lakeview area, Mont.; 4, from
Cedar Breaks, Utah.
Ff: M. borealis utahensis: 1, holotype; 2, from Ogden, Utah; 3, from Big Cottonwood
Canyon, Utah.
g: Intermediate between M. borealis utahensis and M. b. palaceus: 1, 2, from 3 miles north
of Mantua, Utah (2 specimens).
h: M. bruneri: 1, from Ft. McLeod, Alberta, Canada; 2, from Chilcotin, British Columbia,
Canada; 3, from Drain, Oregon; 4, from Mt. Moriah, Nev.
LR SS
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 59
ees,
Some.
IOC
awae,
AS
RIS Aw
Ficure 16.—Explanation on facing page.
60 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
to the Nevada sage grasshopper, Melanoplus rugglesi Gurney. For
instance, Riley, et al. (1880, p. 7), included the following paragraph:
This year [1878], as well as 1877, was a locust year in this sparsely settled
territory. July 11 great numbers appeared at Winnemucca, and disappeared the
13th; on the 18th and 19th swarms again appeared. (United States Weather
Report).
Since the season of the year noted above is normal for rugglesi, and
Winnemucca is in the same area through which swarms of rugglesi
passed in the late 1940’s, also since rugglesi could have been mistaken
for spretus by local observers, it seems quite possible that rugglesi is
the species responsible for the report quoted.
Specimens of Melanoplus spretus examined, with full locality label
data except State names:
Canapa: Rosebank, Manitoba, (1 @, 1 9);!Aweme, Manitoba, July {19, 1902,
N. Criddle (1 @, 1 2); Fairfax, July, J. Fletcher (1 , 1 2);* Boissevain,
Manitoba, Aug. 26, 1879 (1 @); Delorain (Manitoba), July 8, 1898 (1 #, 1 9);
Manitoba, Aug. 28, 1877 (1 @); Arctic America, R. Kennicott, S. H. Scudder
cn
Minnesota: Glyndon, Aug. 1877 (1 9); Glyndon, Clay Co., July 1, 1875
(1 2); Minneapolis, Aug. 16, 1877 (2 @); ‘‘Minnesota,” Oct. 6, 1876 (38 ¢,6 9).
Norty Daxorta: Bismark, July 23, 1877, Geo. W. Sweet (4 o', 1 2); Clifford,
Traill Co., July 25, 1891 (2 &); Larimore, July 29, 1901 (1 &); Turtle Mts.®
(1 #, 2 9); “N. Dakota,”’ July, 1900 (1 ¢&).
Montana: “Mont” (1 ¢, 19).
Iowa: Ackley, Sept. 1, 1877 (2 @); Dallas Co., Aug., Allen (1 9); Harrison
Co., Aug. 4, 1873 (1 co); Monona Co., Aug. 1873 (1 92); “Iowa,” June 1877
(1 &).
NEBRASKA: Lincoln, June 28, 1893, 1,150 ft., Bruner (1 @); Red Willow Post
Office, Aug. 1874, John Byfield (1 &); ‘“‘Nebr.” 1868 (3 o, 1 92); “Nebr.”
1874 (3 o&, 2 Q).
Wromine: Alkali St(ation), 6,000 ft., July 27, 1877 (1 @, 1 9); Steele, “fiying
from S. &S. W.,” July i879, C. A. H. McCauley (1 @); Steele, July 1878 (1 &);
Steele, July 1879 (1 9); “Wyo. Terr.” (1 &).
Ura: Salt Lake Valley, 4,300 ft., Aug. 1-4, 1877 (3 @); Salt Lake, Aug. 16
(1 9); Salt Lake (1 9).
Cotorapo: Argentine Pass, 13,000 ft., July 16, 1877 (2 =); Arapahoe Peak,
11-12,000 ft., Packard (2 @); Boulder, July 19, 1877 (2 &); Colorado Springs,
July 1878 (1 o), July 26, 1877 (2 ¢, 2 9), July 21, 1877 (1 9), Aug. 1, 1877
(1 9), July 1877 (2 2); near Denver, L. Agassiz (1 @); Georgetown, 85—9,500
ft., July 12-13, 1877 (1 &, 29); Mt. Lincoln, above timber, 11-13,000 ft.,
Aug. 138, 1877 (2 9); Pueblo, July 8-9, 1877 (1 &); White River, Aug. 6, 1877,
Mrs. E. H. Danforth (1 9); “Colorado,” July 1877 (1 @); “‘Colorado,” H. V.
Morrison (1 &).
4 These specimens probably are part of the ‘‘enormous numbers” of spretus reported by Mitchener (1954,
p. 50) to have been found at Fairfax, Manitoba, July 4, 1S01, by James Fletcher.
5 Probably collected by Kennicott in the Winnipeg area of Manitoba, as discussed by Scudder (1897b, p.
187), the Scudder name on the label probably referring only to the Scudder collection.
‘These Turtle Mt. specimens probably sre from the same source as a large collection preserved at the
University of Nebraska and reported by Brett (1947, p. 14) as collected by Lawrence Bruner in the early
1880’s. O.S. Bare (in litt., Dec. 19, 1946) has informed us that M. S. Swenk once told him that the Turtle
Mt. series was collected about 1890
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 61
New Mexico: Taos Pk., 13,000 ft. (1 9); ““N. Mexico,” July 21, 1877 (1 &),
July 21, 1877 (1 9).
Missouri: Sarcoxie, July 10, 1877 (2 9); Jackson Co., 1874 (2 9); Jasper
Co., Nov. 12, 1876 (1 o', 1 9); Johnson Co., 1874 (1 @, 19); “N. Mo.,” 1868
(1 &); “Central Mo.,” 1874 (1 9); Holt Co., 1868 (2 9).
Kansas: Cawker City, 1874, N. B. Freeland (1 @, 19); Lawrence, June 18, 1877,
Geo. F. Gaumer (6 o’, one the neotype, 1 9); Manhattan, Nov, 1876 (3 9),
1874, W. C. Howard (2 @); Salina, Oct. 1877 (1 #@, 1 9); Douglas Co., Oct.
1877, G. F. Gaumer (1 @, 1 9); ‘“‘Kans.,”’ 1874 (2 #, 2 2), 1876 (1 2), Nov.
1876 (1 #, 2 9).
Texas: Near Brenham, 1868, Thos. Affleck (1 9); Calvert, devouring kernels
of corn, J. F. Moulton, Jr. (1 o@); Dallas, Boll? (1 &); Salado, May 1877,
J. H. Myers (1 9); “Texas,” Belfrage 7 (1 6, 1 9); ‘‘Texas, common every-
where, has been very destructive in this and adjoining counties, the past few
years,” Belfrage (1 2); “‘Texas,” Pope, May 15 (1 9); “Texas” 1868 (1 9).
Locality uncertain: An original Uhler specimen, probably sent to Scudder by
Uhler, belonging to the Museum of Comparative Zoology, with a round pink
disk, also the labels, ‘“‘Collection of P. R. Uhler’’; “S. H. Seudder Coll’’; ‘“‘Mel-
anoplus spretus Scudder’s Type, 1895”; ‘‘Caloptenus spretus Uhler NRR mi-
gratory” (1 o) (manuscript notes from the late H. S. Barber include a list of
abbreviations given him by Uhler; NRR meant “North Red River’’; also see
Scudder (1897b, p. 187)).
BIoLoGy AND ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE: Prior to 1885 the literature
dealing with the Rocky Mountain grasshopper probably was more
extensive than that then available concerning any other single native
American insect. Since there is no recently gathered information
and it is impossible to sift facts from opinions in much of the volumin-
ous early record, the biology of spretus will be reviewed briefly. The
most important references on biology are those of Packard (1877),
Riley (1876, 1877a, 1877b, 1891), and Riley, et al. (1878, 1880, 1883).
There is a great deal of repetition in those reports, and Riley’s sum-
mary (1891, pp. 9-26) is recommended. When Cyrus Thomas
began the field study of spretus in 1869 (Riley, et al., 1880, p. 73),
he believed from the first year’s observations that the species was
essentially sedentary, but later he and the other commissioners
decided that it was predominantly migratory. Areas inhabited were
defined as follows (Riley, 1891, map; and elsewhere): Permanent
Region, or native breeding grounds, where the species is always found
in greater or less abundance; Subpermanent Region, which the species
frequently invades, in which it can perpetuate itself for several
years, but from which in time it disappears; Temporary Region, or
that only periodically visited, and from which the species disappears
within a year (see map, fig. 14).
Riley, et al. (1878, 1880), supposed portions of Canada (then cus-
tomarily referred to as Arctic America, or British America) to be an
7G. W. Belfrage (1834-1882) and Jacob Boll (1828-1880), both well-known early collectors in Texas. Bel-
frage collected most in Bosque and McLennan Counties.
62 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
important part of the Permanent Region, but it is not clear how
important a part. Walker (1910, p. 336) summarized distributional
findings of the U. S. Entomological Commission for Canada, so far as
the ‘‘Regions” were concerned, but he added little new information.
Criddle (1917), perhaps basing an opinion on observations during years
long after the main outbreak period, said that ‘invasions of Canada”
occurred only during dry seasons, the swarms arriving in July and
August. Roe (1951), in his discussion of the buffalo, said that in the
1870’s and 1880’s there was quite common ignorance of western
Canada. It may have been easy to ascribe the source of something
poorly understood (i. e., swarms of spretus) to a vast, distant region
that was little known entomologically.
Within the Permanent Region, spretus did not breed everywhere,
but instead it did so in favorable spots. River bottoms, sunny slopes
of uplands, and subalpine grassy areas among the mountains were
considered to be favored egg-laying sites. After maturity was
reached, flights within the Permanent Region were common. More
devastating and consequently much more widely publicized, however,
were the “invading swarms” which went primarily in a southerly
or southeasterly direction (except when west of the Rocky Moun-
tains). A day’s flight was estimated to be from 20 to 150 miles.
Stops were usually made at night, but not always. During brief
stops, or when settled in an area for egg-laying, the swarms ate nearly
all crops and wild plants. Swarms might stop anywhere in the
Temporary Region. Riley (1877b, p. 95) stated that in 1876 swarms
left Montana about the middle of July and reached Texas by the
end of September, thus covering 1,500 miles in 75 days, an average
of 20 miles per day.
Swarms developing from eggs laid in the Temporary Region usually
migrated northward or northwestward. In the southern part of the
infested area a partial second generation sometimes occurred, but
spretus had essentially a single generation per year. The time of
hatching, as a general rule, varied from the middle to end of March
in Texas, to the middle of May or beginning of June in Montana.
The young grasshoppers typically displayed gregarious habits soon
after hatching and initial feeding near the hatching site. The nymphs
were described as moving in “schools or armies,” generally ‘‘marching
in a given direction until toward evening” (Riley, 1891, p. 21).
Sometimes the nymphs migrated in a band a mile wide across the
front (Riley, 1877b, p. 233). Usually, marching occurred only during
the warm hours of the day.
Melanoplus spretus was considered to be nearly omnivorous on both
native and cultivated plants, with vegetables and cereals a “main-
stay,”’ though at least in some instances sorghum and broom corn
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 63
were left untouched (Riley, et al. 1878, p. 251). No thorough analysis
of preferences among the native food plants of the Permanent Region
seems to have been made, leading Pfadt (1949, p. 39) to conclude
that there is no information concerning the food-plants on which
spretus originally developed.
During the years when it was more or less prevalent, spretus varied
considerably in its abundance and destructiveness. Riley (1891, p.
10) gave a résumé of the relative abundance between 1818 and 1888.
Bethune (1875) briefly described the early destructive outbreaks in
Manitoba, and a recent summary is by Mitchener (1954). Some of
the summaries of experience with grasshoppers in various States, such
as that of Smith (1954) for Kansas and of Munro (1949) for North
Dakota, have not always differentiated between various species, as
of course it is impossible to do for many of the early years. Schle-
becker (1953) has given perspective to the general subject of grass-
hopper outbreaks, and has reviewed the period of great damage by
spretus. The year 1866, when the Rocky Mountain grasshopper did
great damage in Kansas, Nebraska, northwestern Texas, and also
invaded western Missouri, is described as one of the first years in
which it attracted national attention. The years of greatest abun-
dance were 1873-1876, with 1874 the high point in destructiveness.
In 1874, Colorado, Nebraska, and Kansas were overrun, and parts of
Wyoming, the Dakotas, Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, New Mexico,
Oklahoma, and Texas were ravaged by swarms from Montana and
Canada where they were abundant (Riley, 1891). As recorded by
Riley, et al. (1880), and recalled by Bruner (1883), infestations
dwindled in 1877. Widespread abundance of spretus never occurred
again, though some injury in various years of the 1880’s is attributed
to it, including an important local outbreak in Otter Tail Co., Minn.,
in 1888. None of the 1888 specimens is preserved, so far as known
(Hebard, 1932b, p. 37). Riley, et al. (1883), mapped the reported
hatching and flights of 1880 and 1881. Bruner (1893) reported
spretus present in many parts of middle and eastern Nebraska in 1892,
and quite common at Lincoln, Nebr.
It is probable that the layers of spretus in Grasshopper Glacier,
Park Co., Mont., were deposited during the major recorded swarming
years for spretus, or in earlier years that were comparable, though not
recorded. This glacier, located near the northeastern corner of
Yellowstone National Park, has been discussed in detail by Gurney
(1953). Flights of grasshoppers, probably aided by favorable air
currents, occasionally pass over the glacier, even at its altitude of
nearly 11,000 feet, and specimens landing on the snow are preserved
when the necessary subsequent conditions of freezing and snowfall
occur. Several species have been collected alive on the snow of the
64 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM YOL. 110
glacier in recent years, but spretus is the only species identified from
the remains imbedded in layers here and there in the glacier, and
sometimes conspicuous on the vertical face at the foot. Preserved
samples have long been supposed to be spretus, but during the period
when spretus was considered a migratory phase of mezicanus, and
before the critical features of the aedeagus were known, the samples
were not identifiable other than as mexicanus (as then called). Study
of the aedeagus of specimens now shows the samples in the U. S.
National Museum to be spretus; unfortunately, this had not been
done when the 1953 glacier paper was published. Prior to 1898,
grasshoppers were known to be preserved in the glacier, and they were
first examined and identified as spretus in 1914. The rather fragmen-
tary samples now at the U. S. National Museum represent 13 speci-
mens, from which two males taken in 1949 by Dr. J. R. Parker and
one taken in 1952 by Dr. Irving Friedman have been dissected and
found to be spretus. The dorsal valve of those males is well pre-
served and typical. Fragments of grasshoppers collected from the
central and bottom portions of the glacier in 1952 by Dr. Friedman,
of the U. S. Geological Survey, were sent by him to W. F. Libby,
then of the Institute for Nuclear Studies and Department of Chemis-
try, University of Chicago, for age determination by the carbon—14
method. Dr. Libby reported (in litt., Apr. 15, 1953) that the results
indicated an age of 45 + 300 years and that the limits of error were
45 + 600 years. He has since reported (Libby, 1954) the age as
45 + 150 years. ‘The specimens are thus indicated as quite modern,
and the likelihood is that the layers of preserved spretus are not more
than 200 years old, perhaps much younger.
Various writers at about the turn of the century remarked on the
strange disappearance of spretus. Cooley’s (1904a) experience of not
capturing a specimen during five years of collecting in all parts of
Montana was typical. Except for the Grasshopper Glacier material,
the only specimens collected since 1890 that we have examined are
from Clifford, N. Dak., 1891; Lincoln, Nebr., 1893; Delorain, Mani-
toba, 1898; ‘“North Dakota,” 1900; Larimore, N. Dak., 1901; Fairfax,
Manitoba, apparently 1901; Aweme, Manitoba, 1902.8 Rehn and
Hebard (1906, p. 408) and Hebard (1928, p. 283; 1929, p. 390) recorded
three specimens (as spretus) which Hebard collected at Pike’s Peak
and near Manitou, Colo., in 1904. The single male, from Pike’s Peak,
on examination of the aedeagus, proves to be M. bilituratus bilituratus.
Thus, spretus is not known to have existed since 1902.
Why spretus disappeared and whether it is extinct are unknown.
Riley, et al. (1883), included a long discussion by Lawrence Bruner,
8 All these latest records are represented by males. Aweme, where Norman Criddle lived and worked
for many years, is near Treesbank, and about 15 to 20 miles southwest of Carberry, Manitoba.
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 65
the foremost American field student of grasshoppers of his time, of
factors of weather, natural enemies, and other influences thought to
be related to spretus abundance, but the enigma remains. Cantrall
and Young (1954) hinted at an influence by the American buffalo:
“Tt is obvious that any disturbance in a habitat is accompanied by
population fluctuations with the increase of some species and the
decrease of others. The appearance of the migratory locust, Melano-
plus mexicanus migratory phase spretus, following reduction of the
great buffalo herds may be a classical example of the phenomenon.”
We have examined the well-documented reports of Hornaday (1889)
and Roe (1951) in an effort to determine whether there is a chrono-
logical correlation between the disappearance of the buffalo and the
abundance or disappearance of spretus. So far as the southern herd,
centered in Kansas and adjacent States, is concerned, the last hunting
on a large scale occurred during the winter of 1875-1876. In 1871,
by which time much attention already had been attracted to the
migration of spretus, millions of buffalo remained in Kansas, Okla-
homa, and the Texas Panhandle. The northern herd, located mainly
in Wyoming, Montana, and the Dakotas, was slaughtered later than
the southern one. The years 1878-1883 were the biggest hunting
years, with the last major hunt in the season (about October—Febru-
ary) of 1882-1883. Therefore, in Montana, which was the heart of
the Permanent Region for spretus, the peak of grasshopper outbreaks
had passed (1877) before the buffalo herd was removed. After
considering possible effects of the buffalo in feeding and trampling on
the range, and the feeding by young nymphs on dry buffalo manure,
it is difficult to see any relation other than near chronological coinci-
dence between grasshopper and buffalo.
Uvarov (1921) advanced the “phase theory” of locusts, which later
became generally accepted as a fact, and Hebard (1925a, pp. 112, 113;
1928, pp. 281-284) suggested that spretus might be the migratory
phase of mexicanus. Faure (1933) concluded, following rearing experi-
ments, that he had demonstrated that nymphs of bilituratus [mezi-
canus] could change into spretus, thus establishing the phase explana-
tion. However, the measurements of his laboratory-reared “‘spretus’’
are not fully typical of the historical specimens of spretus, and his
demonstration was not conclusive (Hebard, 1936c, p. 48). Brett
(1947) also believed that by regulating the food and laboratory
environment of growing nymphs he had produced “spretus.”’ His
material, samples of which have been deposited in the U. S. National
Museum, shows considerable variation in wing length, but the aedeagi
of all the males seen are ascribable to M. bilituratus vulturnus, and
no approach to the aedeagus of spretus is shown. If spretus were a
477119—59——_5
66 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
phase of bilituratus, it might be supposed that during the fairly ex-
tensive flights of the 1930’s, as reported by Parker, et al. (1955),
there would have been signs of spretus development. But such was
not the case, and now, in the light of aedeagal characters here dis-
cussed, it seems that bilituratus and spretus are distinct species.
Nevertheless, for 25 years the view that spretus is the migratory phase
of bilituratus [mexicanus] had considerable acceptance (Hebard, 1929,
1931, 1936c; Gurney, 19538, p. 314, pl. 7, fig. p; Parker, et al., 1955).
Brett (1947) felt that settlement of spretus breeding grounds for
farming and grazing was responsible in some way for the disappearance
of the grasshoppers. Impressed by short-winged specimens reared on
alfalfa, he also stressed a possible correlation between the increase in
alfalfa acreage and spretus decline. Pfadt (1949, p. 39) expressed
doubt that alfalfa was a major factor and implied that the little
available information concerning preferred native food plants of
spretus is an inadequate basis for any general conclusions explaining
the disappearance. We have failed to learn of any pronounced
range-plant changes in Montana during the 1860’s, 1870’s, or 1880’s,
so far as the general disappearance or replacement of plant species is
concerned. (See Andrewartha and Birch (1954, esp. pp. 594-600)
for a discussion of conditions related to population fluctuations.)
The irregular periodicity of historic spretus swarms, the apparently
nearly omnivorous appetite and very long-winged condition of
swarming adults, and the marching behavior of nymphal bands
suggest the occurrence of a migratory phase. If this view is correct,
spretus probably had a solitary phase which occurred in relatively
localized colonies, possibly adapted to a specialized environment.
There is the example of Melanoplus rugglesi, which in the Great Basin
attracted widespread attention for about 13 years (1939-1952) as a
migratory phase. Previously, rugglest had been virtually unknown,
and at present the solitary phase is scarcely found except by ento-
mologists acquainted with the specialized habitat of the small localized
colonies. A handicap in studying the possible correlation of weather
conditions and spretus abundance is a shortage of reliable weather
records, prior to 1886, for such Western States as Montana.
Criddle (1917) discussed the former prevalence of spretus, and added:
“At present, however, the insect seems to have vanished completely.
Indeed, there are some who would place it with the Passenger Pigeon
as an object of the past. It seems almost incomprehensible, however,
that such can be the case. More probably the real permanent
breeding grounds are more restricted than was supposed, and the
locust will yet be located either by the discovery of its real haunts
or by a new invasion following favorable weather conditions for
breeding purposes.’”’ One immediately wonders whether a solitary
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 67
phase of spretus still exists, and if so what are the most likely breeding
places. Montana, east of the Continental Divide, and North Dakota
would seem likely possibilities. A solitary phase of spretus, if it
exists, probably is smaller and shorter-winged than the _ historic
specimens, and the aedeagus may be the only reliable distinguishing
character. It is possible that specimens of a solitary phase now
exist in collections, but if so they have not been recognized. Popula-
tions of the mexicanus group, both preserved specimens and field
samples, should have the aedeagus examined critically on the chance
that new evidence bearing on the spretus problem will be disclosed.
Melanoplus borealis (Fieber)
The distribution of this species is indicated by the two maps of
its subspecies (figs. 17, 18) and, for the United States, by Newton
and Gurney (1956, map 56). As the specific name suggests, this is
a boreal insect, which in the United States is primarily northern or
occurs in mountainous areas.
Mostly on the basis of tegminal length and the shape of the male
subgenital plate, four subspecies are here recognized. Our study
of the aedeagus has failed thus far to show differences in the aedeagus
among the subspecies. However, Hebard (1935a, p. 67), in writing
of what he called the borealis group, stated: “Examination of the penis
now shows that this organ is of the same general type in all of the
recognized races but shows distinct proportionate differences in some.”
Some differences in the epiphallus are here reported, but the examina-
tion of more material is required before their significance can be fully
evaluated.
Melanoplus borealis borealis (Fieber)
FicurgEs 3,3; 7,3; 8,f; 9,c; 10,c,l,s; 11,c; 16,d; 17; 18; PLate 5,a,B,pD.
Caloptenus borealis Fieber, Lotus, vol. 3, p. 120, 1853 (unstated number of
specimens from ‘‘(Grénland) Nord. Cap. (Labrador) M. Hal. Fieb.’”’). Lecto-
type here designated: Male from original Fieber series (according to Dr.
Max Beier, in litt., Jan. 17, 1957) with the following labels: ‘‘Podisma
borealis Fieb. Gronl.’’; “Mus. Caes. Vindebon.’’; ‘det. Holdhaus Melanoplus
borealis Fieb.”’; ‘‘Par.”’; ‘23’? (Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna).
Pezotettix septentrionalis Saussure, Rev. Mag. Zool., p. 159, 1861 (unstated
number of specimens from Labrador). Lectotype here designated: Female
labeled “P. septentrionalis Sss. Type’’; ‘Labrador’; and with a lectotype
label attached by Gurney (Museum d’Histoire Naturelle, Geneva). (The
Saussure collection contains two series of septentrionalis, one consisting of
lectotype, a second containing 17 specimens (15 from Labrador and 2 from
“Hudson’’) (C. Ferriere, in litt., Jan. 23, 1957).)
Caloptenus extremus Walker, Cat. Derm. Salt. B. M., Pt. 4, p. 681, 1870 (two
females from “‘Arctic America”). Lectotype here designated: Female labeled
Caloptenus extremus and as type, and with both hind legs present (British
Museum). (The second original female lacks both hind legs. The lectotype
68 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VoL. 110
also bears an accessions registration label, ‘51/49,’ which is associated
with the following notebook data: “District watered by Mackenzie and
Slave R. Presented by Sir John Richardson.” (D. R. Ragge, in litt., Jan.
10, 25, 1957).)
Pezotettix junius Dodge, Canad. Ent., vol. 8, pp. 9-10, 1876 (males, females, from
Glencoe, Dodge Co., Nebr.). New synonymy. Lectotype here designated:
Male labeled ‘‘Pez. Junius &G. M. Dodge Type; Collection C. V. Riley”
(USNM). (A similarly labeled female is associated with the lectotype.
Though no original locality label exists, Dodge stated that the species occurred
at Glencoe, Nebr.)
Caloptenus parvus Provancher, Nat. Canad., vol. 8, p. 110, 1876 (one male from
Cap Rouge, Quebec [southern outskirts of Quebec City]). Lectotype here
designated: The first of two males pinned in Provancher'’s first collection
(Musée de la Province, Quebec). (N.—M. Comeau has reported (in litt.,
Jan. 8, 1957) that although a single specimen was originally mentioned, an
1877 catalog mentioned two, and that both are now in very good condition.)
Melanoplus extremus scandens Scudder, Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, p. 289, pl. 1, fig.
f, 1897 (unstated number of specimens from Big Horn Mountains, Wyo.,
and several localities in New England, as well as unstated localities ‘‘in the
high north’). Lectotype here designated: Male labeled ‘‘White Mts. Alpine.
Scudder, Drawn, Mel. extremus Scudder’s Type, 1895, Drawn for Ap-
palachia, S. H. Scudder Coll., Type 15466” (MCZ). (Tegmina of lectotype
extend 5 mm. behind the apex of abdomen. A female with similarly long
tegmina bears the same data.)
Melanoplus monticola Scudder, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. 36 (154), pp. 24,
34, 1897; Proc. U. 8S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, pp. 135, 290-291, pl. 19, fig. 5, 1897
(two males, two females from ‘‘above timber line on Sierra Blanca, Colo-
rado’”’). New synonymy. Lectotype designated by Rehn and Hebard
(1912, p. 84): The figured male (MCZ). (Only fragments of the lectotype
remain. The second original male is at Philadelphia (ANSP); its subgenital
plate is about as in fig. 16,d-2, in lateral view, and in posterior view two prom-
inences are developed, much as in fig. 11,b-4.)
The following four specimens of borealis were loaned from Vienna
by Dr. Beier in addition to the lectotype: One nymph labeled as from
Greenland; a female labeled Labrador, 1870; a female from Okak
Islands, Labrador, 1838; a female from Nain, Labrador, 1832. The
last two specimens bear labels reading ‘‘Coll. Br. v. W. Labrador,
Coll. Sommer.’”’ M. C. Sommer was a Danish handler and collector
of insects who died in 1868, from whom Brunner is recorded as ob-
taining Orthoptera, and it seems probable that these are the female
specimens from Labrador recorded by Brunner (1861, p. 223) as
Caloptenus borealis. At the same time he recorded material from
Valdivia [Chile], the latter doubtless being a misidentification.
Brunner’s specimens may not have been available to Fieber in 1853,
hence the lectotypic selection of the male which does not provide a
clear type locality, though it unmistakably is the species currently
called Melanoplus borealis (aedeagus exposed, preserved in dry
condition).
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 69
There is no record of borealis from Greenland since Fieber. Henriksen
and Lundbeck (1917) and Henriksen (1939) did not report it, and
S. L. Tuxen of Copenhagen, who is familiar with current work on
Greenland, has assured us (in litt., Jan. 26, 1957) that the Fieber
record must be incorrect. No Acrididae have been taken on Green-
land by Danish entomologists who in summer collect there regularly.
Likewise there is no subsequent record of borealis from North Cape
or elsewhere in Norway (Ander, 1949a, 1949b; Knaben, 1943),
although Scudder (1897b, p. 272) assumed that Fieber’s locality ‘‘Nord.
Cap.” is the one in Norway. Since Fieber included borealis in a
treatment of European Orthoptera, and did not enclose the locality
in parentheses, as he did the two non-European localities, it is fair to
assume that he regarded North Cape, Norway, as one of his localities.
On the other hand, there is North Cape, Prince Edward Island, and
Cape North, Nova Scotia, which may have been unknown to him
though ports of call for North Atlantic shipping. There is a strong
probability that none of Fieber’s specimens originated in either
Norway or Greenland. Therefore, no definite type locality can be
recognized; the lectotype probably came from Labrador or nearby.
No information is available about any Fieber material of borealis
which may have been deposited at Halle, Germany; the main Fieber
collection is in Vienna.
The synonymy of septentrionalis was indicated by Scudder (1897b,
p. 270) and later by Blatchley (1920, p. 424). Blatchley also treated
extremus and parvus as synonyms of borealis. Essig (1926, p. 81)
incorrectly listed extremus as a synonym of brunert. Hebard (1925a,
p. 111) treated extremus as a synonym of borealis borealis, and he also
placed scandens as a synonym of borealis junius. Scudder (1897b,
p. 287) synonymized parvus under eztremus. His interpretation
recognized parvus as the northern form with red color prominent on
the hind legs rather than the pale type as represented by the synony-
mous junius. It is in agreement with Provancher’s description of
parvus, which refers to the red color on both hind femur and hind
tibia. Hebard (1925a, p. 111) may have overlooked this feature of
parvus, and thus was incorrect in regarding parvus as identical with
junus. Both junius and parvus were described in 1876,-in journal
issues of January and April, respectively, though actual dates of
mailing have not been ascertained by us. The dates and the identity
of parvus are important if in the future the southeastern population
should be restored to subspecific rank.
Scudder utilized what he believed to be differences in the shape of
the apical part of the male subgenital plate to separate borealis,
extremus and monticola, but his differences are not constant in series
of specimens. His scandens consisted of individuals mainly from
70 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
high altitudes and was characterized by tegmina reaching somewhat
beyond the apices of the hind femora, while in gunius the tegmina
usually did not quite reach those apices. Hebard (1930, p. 397)
noted that monticola is separated from typical borealis largely by
shorter wings and tegmina, but he indicated that some far northern
specimens would be assigned to borealis monticola if that character
was followed, and he clearly was impressed by the local variation
occurring in the Northwest. For the most part, specimens from the
northeastern United States and southeastern Canada have the lower
surfaces of the hind femora yellowish, and the hind tibiae are yellowish
or dirty pale brown, while specimens from further north and the
Rocky Mountains usually have the lower femoral surfaces and the
hind tibiae reddish. Series from Ontario and Manitoba show inter-
mediate conditions, and as a whole the populations represented by
qunius and monticola do not seem sufficiently defined for their recogni-
tion to serve a useful purpose. Hebard (1929, p. 387) said that
borealis monticola was the least well defined of four races of borealis
which he recognized, and (1932b, p. 37) he stated that gunius is a
“very weakly defined race.” Later (Hebard 1934a, p. 105), he noted
the difficulty of separating borealis junius and borealis borealis in
northern Minnesota and suggested that junius might be merely a
pallid color phase developed in response to a more temperate environ-
ment. White and Rock (1941) recorded both borealis borealis and
borealis junius from Alberta, and later (1945) recorded borealis
monticola also. In 1945 they discussed variation and the problem of
trying to justify the recognition of these subspecies. Blatchley (1920)
and Morse (1920) have discussed the variation shown by borealis.
Scudder (1897b, pp. 270, 272) placed Caloptenus arcticus Walker in
the synonymy of borealis, with some uncertainty, and Blatchley (1920)
did so definitely. This is now considered untrue, as here discussed
under M. biltturatus bilituratus (p. 15).
In Canada the junior author has recognized two races or ecological
forms within borealis borealis. Specimens from Labrador, James Bay,
Northwest Territories, northern Quebec and Ontario, northern
Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta, and from British Columbia are
heavier, darker, more discolored, with more evident spotting on the
tegmina, and consistently higher tegmina/femur ratios in both long-
and short-winged forms than the more southern counterparts. The
form from the southern or grassland portion of the prairie provinces
is smaller, generally pale brownish yellow, with tegminal spotting
much reduced, and frequently with the hind femur entirely pale.
A broad zone of transition between the two forms is evident in
eastern Saskatchewan and in Manitoba, the smaller, paler form
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 71
occurring in southern (aspen-willow association) localities, the larger,
darker form in the north (aspen-spruce association). Both forms
contain long-winged and short-winged individuals, often together in
one population; the short-winged type usually predominates but
occasionally (as in the Cypress Hills in 1952) the long-winged type
appears more numerous.
DescrirTivE Notes: A small to medium-sized, fully winged member
of the mexicanus group; closely related to borealis stupefactus, from
which it differs primarily in wing length, and to borealis palaceus,
from which it differs mainly in the less strongly upturned male sub-
genital plate. Males with tegmina usually varying from slightly
short of the apex of the abdomen to slightly beyond the abdomen,
occasionally a little short of reaching supra-anal plate or at the other
extreme with as much as one-fourth of the tegmen reaching beyond the
abdomen. Females with tegmina varying from a condition in which
about two-thirds of the abdomen is covered to one in which the
tegmina extend beyond the abdomen by nearly one-fourth of their
length. Posterior third of male abdomen occasionally strongly re-
curved dorsally, especially in specimens from northern Rocky Moun-
tains, but usually abdomen is horizontal or only moderately recurved.
VariaTion: The size of 12 representative males measured (in
millimeters) varies in pronotal length from 3.7 to 4.7 (av. 4.2), in
length of hind femur from 9.7 to 12.2 (av. 10.8), and in length of teg-
men from 8.4 to 16.4 (av. 12.6). Eight females vary in pronotal
length from 4.1 to 5.5 (av. 4.8), in length of hind femur from 10.2 to
12.7 (av. 11.4), and in length of tegmen from 11.0 to 16.6 (av. 13.0).
The largest specimens are from the northwest, particularly the North-
west Territories and Alaska.
Mate GENITALIA: Cercus (fig. 7, 7) variable, usually about as in
figure 7,j-1; supra-anal plate with lateral elevations strongly raised;
furculae usually strongly tapered, separation evident to base, and
scarcely reaching middle of supra-anal plate (fig. 9,c-1), sometimes
variable (fig. 9,c-2, c-3); subgenital plate in lateral view with dorsal
margin varying from essentially straight or slightly upturned apically
(fig. 16,d-1) to moderately upturned, in posterior view with margin
usually entire, rarely with an indication of twin apices (fig. 11,c-1);
posterior surface of subgenital plate rather evenly rounded, without
development of the rectangular-shaped disk usually characteristic of
borealis palaceus, as in fig. 11,d-5. Aedeagus with main stem relatively
short; dorsal valve moderately sclerotized but not parchment-like as
in bruneri, in dorsal view lacking the triangular projection shown for
bruneri (fig. 3,k,1); accessory lobe relatively large and frequently
directed somewhat laterally; epiphallus as drawn (fig. 8,/).
72 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
FEMALE GENITALIA: Cercus (fig. 10,/) averaging more slender, the
dorsal ‘‘scoop” of the dorsal ovipositor valve less excavate than in
bruneri, but females of the two species not always separable.
Coxtoration: General coloration about as in bilituratus; hind femur
usually unbanded except dorsally on mesal side where three dark
transverse bands usually occur, external bands sometimes present,
as in specimens from Hudson Bay area which have the pale areas along
the dorsal surface of the hind femur noticeably yellowish in fresh
specimens; ventral surface of hind femur and lateral surface ventrad of
paginal area usually reddish except in specimens from the Plains
States eastward and in southern Ontario and Quebec, reddish area of
femur normally correlated with red hind tibia.
Males of borealis borealis from the Big Horn Mountains, Wyo., and
Fremont Co., Idaho, show a trend toward borealis palaceus, and they
suggest intergradation although they are not fully intermediate.
Males from Smithers, British Columbia, show a noticeable develop-
ment of the dorsal lip at the apex of the subgenital plate.
DistrispuTion: The principal recorded distribution of M. borealis
borealis, additional to what is shown on our maps (figs. 17, 18), is that
noted by Morse (1920) for Maine, and Hebard’s statement (1931, p.
184) that borealis junius is known from Mountain Grove in the Ozark
Mountains of south-central Missouri. J. W.H. Rehn (1939) recorded
borealis from Grande Miquelon and St. Pierre, near Newfoundland.
Male specimens of Melanoplus borealis borealis have been examined
from the localities shown in figures 17 and 18.
BioLOGY AND ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE: This subspecies is significant
as a rangeland pest, and occasionally it attacks crops, but it is not
of major importance. Information from the Bozeman, Mont., lab-
oratory of the Entomology Research Division, U. S. Department of
Agriculture, indicates that this is one of the important grasshoppers
in the Targhee National Forest, Fremont Co., Idaho, and the Bridger
National Forest, Wyo. It is reported to have been the dominant
grasshopper in 1952 in the northern Cariboo and the Prince George
Districts of British Columbia (Canad. Insect Pest Rev., vol. 30,
p. 307, 1952; Neilson, 1953), as well as injuring alfalfa, grain, and
vegetable gardens in northern Saskatchewan (Canad. Insect Pest
Reyv., vol. 30, p. 150, 1952).
Buckell (1921) characterized borealis in the Chilcotin District of
British Columbia as an humicolous hygrophile, an ‘inhabitant of the
tall rank vegetation beneath birch and willow on the borders of
streams.” He found it a sluggish, richly colored insect. ‘Tolerance
for a variety of habitats is shown by W. J. Brown’s experience (in
litt., Mar. 1, 1949) of collecting it at Churchill, Manitoba, in areas
supporting trees, though at Reindeer Depot he collected it on gently
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 73
Ficure 17.—Distribution of male specimans of Melanoplus borealis borealis examined from
Alaska and Canada.
rolling, treeless, Arctic tundra that consisted of damp, cold sphagnum
which thawed only from 11 to 19 inches during summer. Plants
present there included Labrador tea, blueberry, grasses, sedges, and
others. Readers interested in the limits of the true Arctic Zone are
referred to Kimble and Good (1955) and Munroe (1956).
Caudell (1900) suspected borealis of being localized in Alaska, after
the collector of the specimens he reported, T. Kincaid, found it in
a sphagnum swamp at Kukak Bay, but nowhere else in the surround-
ing countryside. The only habitat notes from Labrador which have
been seen are those of Scudder (1897b, p. 272), who reported that
a collector described finding borealis abundant in luxuriant plants
beside a mountain brook.
In the United States and southern Canada borealis has been found
most often in cool, damp situations, as discussed by Blatchley (1920)
and Morse (1920), but, while it appears to enjoy bogs and areas of
sedges and other plants found in mountain meadows, it also occurs
in moist open pastures and mowed fields in New England (Gurney
1935). Cantrall (1943) considered it a characteristic inhabitant of
“the leatherleaf stratum of the bog habitat” in southern Michigan.
In the prairie provinces of Canada the subspecies inhabits tall rank
vegetation on the borders of streams and ponds within a forested
area. Similar situations in the open grasslands are not occupied.
The distribution is therefore local in grassland areas.
The biology of borealis borealis has not been studied fully. Nymphs
are described by Handford (1946). It has been suggested that in
ee eEeE—Eee ee EO OeeEEeEeEeEeEeeeeeeeeEeeae—eaeamam=e—e—EEOEEOOOO ew EEE
“SOTFITEIOT $930IS peyuy) WOl} poullulexo §1]D03404 snjqdounjayy jo suowtoods oyew fo uolNnnqiysiq— sg] aan yy
VOL, 110
Se}Oipawajur sisuayojn—snaodojo0d
SayDIpsw4ajul snadojod—sijpas0q
Saj;DIpawisjul
snaao0jpd—snyoDjyadnjs—sijon9a10q
sisuayojn sijdas0q “W
snedojod sijpai0q “Ww
SNyODjJadnjs sijDes0q “Ww
$1]09J0q $}|D970q “W
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM
74
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS Vi)
parts of British Columbia two years are required for a complete life
cycle (Canad. Insect Pest Rev., vol. 34, p. 273, 1956). Seasonally,
it has been considered an early form by Morse (1920) and Cantrall
(1943). The following are extreme dates on the labels of specimens
examined: Warren Woods, 8S. Dak., May 28; Cummington, Mass.,
June 12—Aug. 16; Mt. Greylock, Mass., July 3, Aug. 17; Bloomington,
Ind., June 16; Sawmill Bay, Northwest Territories, July 14; Chilkat
Pass, British Columbia, July 13; Reindeer Depot, Northwest Terri-
tories, Aug. 3, Aug. 16; Fairbanks, Alaska, July 4, Sept. 2; Nain,
Labrador, Aug. 4; Hopedale, Labrador, Sept. 6; Big Horn Mts.,
Wyo., Aug. 15. Morse (1921) reported collections in Maine from
June 6 to Aug. 25, and Alexander (1951, p. 109) reported that both
nymphs and adults (as M. b. monticola) were taken in August from
several high Colorado peaks.
This subspecies is known from many mountainous areas in the
southern part of its range, but it is not confined to high altitudes.
Localities near sea level in Labrador, in the bogs at Mer Bleue,®
Ontario, at about 1,400 feet in Cummington, Mass., and at various
localities in Michigan, Minnesota, and Iowa show that fact. The
following are some of the altitudes, shown on labels, at which it has
been collected: Chilkat Pass, British Columbia, 3,500 ft.; Yoho Val-
ley, British Columbia, 5,000 ft.; Yellowstone National Park, 6,800
ft.; Pikes Peak, Colo., 12,000 ft.
Melanoplus borealis stupefactus (Scudder)
Ficures 8,d,h; 9,d; 10,d,m; 11,6; 16,c; 18; Puate 5,5,F.
Pezotettiz stupefactus Scudder, Rep. Surv. W. of 100th Mer., App. JJ, p. 283,
1876 (1 male, 3 females, nymphs, Taos Peak, Sangre de Cristo Mountains,
N. Mex.). Lectotype designated by Hebard (1929, p. 387): Male (USNM).
Melanoplus cockerelli Scudder, Psyche, vol. 9, pp. 124-125, 1900 (1 male, 1 female,
summit of range between Pecos and Sapello Rivers, N. Mex., near head-
waters of Pecos). Lectotype designated by Hebard (1929, p, 388): Male
labeled ‘‘Top of range betw. Sapello and Pecos Rivers. Alt. 11,000 ft.
Aug.” (MCZ).
Melanoplus sapellanus Scudder, Psyche, vol. 9, p. 125, 1900 (1 male, 3 females,
same locality as cockerelli). Lectotype designated by Hebard (1929, p. 388):
Male (MCZ).
Melanoplus latifercula Caudell, Proc. U. 8S. Nat. Mus., vol. 26, pp. 803-804,
pl. 55, fig. 4, 4a, 1903 (1 male, Cumbres, Colo.) (USNM).
Hebard (1929) indicated the synonymy here shown, which is sup-
ported by our study of the four types. Scudder (1897b) placed
stupefactus in the genus Podisma, and then when he described cocker-
ell1 he failed to recognize stwpefactus and considered it a relative of
§ A large area containing many sphagnum bogs, near the southeastern city limits of Ottawa. F. A.
Urquhart and E. G. Munroe have informed us that Carlsbad Springs is near the eastern extremity of the
bog area, and that Hawthorne is at the northwest corner. Auer (1930, fig. 1) shows Mer Bleue as some
10 to 15 miles east of Ottawa.
76 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Melanoplus dawsoni (Scudder). His sapellanus, with data identical
to those of cockerelli, was based largely on a male with imperfectly
developed genitalia.
Descriptive Notes: A short-winged, flightless subspecies averaging
smaller than borealis borealis and with the furculae usually wider than
in the latter. 'Tegmina broadly lanceolate, usually overlapping nar-
rowly but sometimes not quite attingent, covering from scarcely more
than one-third to slightly more than one-half of abdomen (about 1%
to 1% times length of pronotum); wings vestigial. Posterior third of
abdomen moderately to considerably recurved dorsally.
MALE GENITALIA: Cercus (fig. 8,d) proportionately broader than in
the other subspecies (distorted by drying in lectotype of stupefactus,
fig. 8,d-1); furculae usually as in figure 9,d-2, seldom a little more
tapering, and sometimes broader (fig. 9,d-1) ; subgenital plate in lateral
view with posterior portion of dorsal margin upturned as a lip about
to the extent in figure 16,c, not sinuate, posterior margin sometimes
more nearly vertical and less oblique than in the figured specimen, in
posterior view the dorsal margin variable (fig. 11,0) but usually with
at least weakly indicated twin apices. Aedeagus as in borealis borealis;
epiphallus with rather deep emargination of anterior margin between
ancorae, lophi lanceolate in dorsal view, rather highly elevated and
with profile of posterior portions evenly rounded in lateral view (fig.
10,d).
FEMALE GENITALIA: About as in borealis borealis, the cercus averag-
ing more robust (fig. 10,m).
Cororation: Typically dark for the species; hind tibia and ventral
surface of hind femur, reaching slightly onto external paginal area,
dark red; dark transverse bands of hind femur visible dorsally,
variable on external surface.
VARIATION: The size of eight representative males, measured in
millimeters, varies in pronotal length from 3.6 to 4.5 (av. 4.0), in
length of hind femur from 9.0 to 10.8 (ay. 9.7), and in length of tegmen
from 4.7 to 7.0 (av. 5.9). Three measured females vary in pronotal
length from 4.4 to 4.7 (av. 4.5), in length of hind femur from 11.2 to
11.3 (av. 11.3), and in length of tegmen from 6.5 to 7.4 (av. 6.9).
Hebard (1929, p. 389) reported 29 males, 27 females, and 2 nymphs
from Tomboy, Colo., also a nymph from Trout Lake, San Miguel Co.,
Colo., which he regarded as intermediate between borealis monticola
and borealis stupefactus. Specimens from the Tomboy series and a male
from White River Forest, Colo., have the tegmina covering about
three-fourths of the abdomen, the furculae averaging narrower than in
typical borealis stupefactus, the dorsal lip of the apex of the male
subgenital plate higher and without twin apices developed. These
specimens average larger than borealis stupefactus, and have an average
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS V7
tegminal length of 9.5 mm. in males, 10.8 mm. in females. We regard
them as intermediate between b. borealis, 6. stupefactus, and 6. palaceus.
Disrrisution: Hebard’s record from Gothic, Colo. (1929), is a
northern extension of the distribution (fig. 18) based on specimens
examined.
Specimens of Melanoplus borealis stupefactus have been examined
from the following localities:
Cotorapo: Mineral Co.; Silverton, San Juan Co.; Lizard Head; peak north of
Cumbres, Cumbres Range, Conejos Co.; Los Pinos, Conejos Co.; Cumbres.
New Mexico: Taos Peak; Truchas Peak; Beulah; top of range between Sapello
and Pecos Rivers; Santa Fe Baldy; head of Nambe Creek, Sangre de Cristo
Range.
The following material is intermediate between Melanoplus borealis
stupefactus, M. b. borealis, and M. b. palaceus:
Cotorapvo: Tomboy, Marshall Basin, San Juan Range (about 2 to 3 miles north-
east of Telluride; A. B. G.), 11,400 ft., Sept. 2, 1921, Rehn and Hebard (12 0’,
15 9); White River Forest, Aug. 1933 (1 0”).
The male from Trout Lake, San Miguel Co., Colo., collected by
Hebard Sept. 4, 1921, at 9,700 feet, and reported by him (1929, p.
389) as intermediate between borealis monticola and 6b. stupefactus has
tegmina covering slightly more than one-half of the abdomen. We
regard it as 0. stupefactus.
BroLoGy AND ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE: Most of the known biological
data on this grasshopper have been summarized by Hebard (1929, pp.
388-389; 1935a, p. 67). It is of no recognized economic importance,
and there have been no detailed studies of its bionomics. Distribu-
tion is mainly if not entirely in the Arctic Alpine and Hudsonian
zones in northern New Mexico and southwestern Colorado. The
lowest altitude at which it has been recorded is 8,500 feet at the head
of Chupidero Creek, N. Mex., and the highest 12,629 feet at the
summit of Santa Fe Baldy, N. Mex.
Small numbers of specimens have been recorded well above timber
line, there occurring in patches of green vegetation, but it has been
found abundant on mountain slopes and in mountain meadows of
lush grasses and other plants such as marsh marigold (Caltha lepto-
sepala Hooker). At each of two localities (Los Pinos, Colo.; head of
Chupidero Creek, Sangre de Cristo Range, N. Mex.), Hebard reported
more than 50 adult specimens take by himself and Rehn, while on
Neff Mountain, Cumbres Range, Colo., he reported their collecting
more than 100 adults. Collection dates range from July 24 to Sep-
tember 11, and nymphs have been observed throughout July and
August. Hebard found about two-thirds of the specimens at the
summit of Santa Fe Baldy still immature on August 1. Many nymphs
of the intermediate population at Tomboy, Colo., were taken on Sept.
2, 1921, by Rehn and Hebard.
78 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Melanoplus borealis palaceus Fulton
Frcurss 8,a; 10,t; 11,d; 16,e; 18; PuatE 4,p.
Melanoplus borealis palaceus Fulton, Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer., vol. 23, pp. 619-620,
fig. 1,r-u, 1930 (5 males, 8 females, Upper Klamath Marsh, Oreg.). The
holotype male and allotype female were designated by Fulton (USNM).
Descriptive NoTEs: A usually fully winged subspecies, averaging
slightly larger than borealis borealis, moderately larger than 6.
stupefactus, and slightly smaller than 6. utahensis. Characterized
especially in the male by the strongly upturned and recurved apical
third of the abdomen, and by the subgenital plate which apically is
considerably produced dorsally though only moderately produced
posteriorly. Male tegmina usually reaching about to apex of
abdomen and apices of hind femora, sometimes a little shorter; female
tegmina averaging a little shorter, rarely slightly exceeding hind
femora.
Mate GENITALIA: Cercus usually as in figure 8,a-2, somewhat
variable (fig. 8,a-3,4), and in holotype (fig. 8,a-1) its lateroposterior
margin rather irregular; supra-anal plate and furculae of holotype
and of most specimens much as in figure 9,d, in a few specimens the
furculae somewhat shorter and less widely separated at their apices;
subgenital plate in lateral view (fig. 16,¢) somewhat variable, the
apical portion of dorsal margin much elevated, in posterior view the
dorsal margin (fig. 11,d) usually entire, sometimes with traces of
emargination, rarely with a median depression creating twin knobs,
the posterior surface of subgenital plate usually with a roughly rec-
tangular vertical area which is sometimes weakly excavate (x of fig.
11,d-5); one paratype (Univ. Michigan) with subgenital plate less
elevated and with rectangular area of posterior surface less well
defined than in holotype. Aedeagus essentially as in borealis borealis;
epiphallus in dorsal view usually about as in figure 8,f, in holotype
the apices of lophi somewhat more lanceolate, in lateral view lophus
usually noticeably flattened at top near apex, much as in figure 10,e.
FEMALE GENITALIA: About as in borealis borealis; cercus of allotype
essentially like figure 10,/, in some specimens slightly more acute;
dorsal ovipositor valve with “scoop” of allotype (fig. 10,t) and several
other specimens more deeply excavate than usual in b. borealis, but in
other females not clearly different, margins of ‘‘scoop” slightly irregu-
lar, seldom with a deep notch as in allotype.
VaRIATION: The size of seven representative males, measured in
millimeters, varies in pronotal length from 4.2 to 4.8 (av. 4.5), in
length of hind femur from 10.8 to 11.7 (av. 11.2), and in length of
tegmen from 11.0 to 14.5 (av. 12.6). Seven measured females vary
in pronotal length from 4.9 to 5.9 (av. 5.3), in length of hind femur
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 79
from 12.3 to 14.8 (av. 13.4), and in length of tegmen from 11.7 to 15.3
(av. 14.3).
Cotoration: Averaging rather dark for group; hind femur usually
with transverse bands evident only dorsally, ventral surface, part of
mesal surface and external surface ventrad of paginae usually reddish,
rarely yellowish; hind tibia reddish.
Specimens intermediate between borealis palaceus and 6. utahensis
are discussed under the latter. Three males and one female from
Teton Co., Wyo., 5 males from Togwatee Pass (about 30 mi. east of
Jackson Hole), Wyo., and 2 males from Yellowstone National Park,
Wyo. (south side of Mt. Washburn, 8,600 ft.; Camp Cowan, Fireside
River, 7,100 ft.), are considered intermediate between b. palaceus and
b. borealis because of the shape of the male subgenital plate. Males
typical of b. borealis also have been seen from Yellowstone National
Park, and it is evident that the latter is a tension area. Males from
southern Utah are not fully typical of 6. palaceus, and they seem to
vary toward 6. borealis. Three males from Hackamore, Calif., also
are atypical. The apex of the subgenital plate of those males is
dorsally produced less than in typical palaceus, and there is scarcely
any development of a rectangular area on the posterior surface of
the subgenital plate. The number of localities from which 6. palaceus
is known are too few and too scattered to permit a complete under-
standing of the relationships of this subspecies.
DisrrisutTion: Male specimens of Melanoplus borealis palaceus
have been examined from the following localities:
Montana: Lakeview area.
Wromine: Cokeville.
Uran: La Sal Mts., Grand Co.; Puffer Lake, Tushar Mts.; East Fork of Merchant
Valley, Tushar Mts.; Beaver; Cedar Breaks.
Wasuineton: Bonaparte Lake, Okanogan Co.
OrEecon: Upper Klamath Marsh; Bly; Bulls Prairie, Warner Mts.
CauirorniA: Hackamore, Modoe Co.
BIOLOGY AND ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE: The types of M. borealis
palaceus were “found near the pine woods on the border of a large
meadow land known as Upper Klamath Marsh, situated on the
plateau” east of Crater Lake, Oreg. (Fulton, 1930). A male and
female from Bly, in Klamath Co., Oreg., about 50 miles southeast of
the type locality, are labeled “Swp. mdw.,’”’ presumed to mean swampy
meadow. ‘There is little information about altitudinal preferences of
this grasshopper beyond the general upland character of all the areas
where collections have occurred. In the La Sal Mountains, the most
easterly locality where palaceus has been taken, various habitats are
available, as discussed by Tanner and Hayward (1934). At Upper
Klamath Marsh, Oreg., adults have been taken on June 23 and August
80 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
11, and in the Lakeview area, Mont., from July 4 to August 24.
The Bonaparte Lake, Wash., record is based on a male taken on
July 14 at an altitude of 4,000 feet. Three males and one female
from Hackamore, Calif., were taken July 17. The Hackamore area
is characterized by swampy places in which wildlife refuges have
been established, but there is no record of the habitat from which the
specimens were taken. Specimens taken by Rehn and Hebard in the
Tushar Mountains, Utah, were at altitudes varying from 8,200 to
9,000 feet, while on the Markagunt Plateau at Cedar Breaks, Utah,
captures occurred at 10,400 feet. Dates of these Utah captures by
Rehn and Hebard ranged from August 20 to August 31.
Because of the scanty information about the environment in most
of the localities where palaceus has been collected, a brief description
of the Lakeview area, Mont., is appropriate. For these notes we are
indebted primarily to Frank T. Cowan, who loaned an unpublished
manuscript prepared by the late H. M. Jennison, when, as a member
of a research team under the direction of J. R. Parker in the early
1930’s, he studied the vegetation of the Centennial Valley. Lakeview
is a small village in the Centennial Valley, in extreme southeastern
Beaverhead County. This high mountain valley is 40 to 45 miles long
and 3 to 8 miles wide, and is bounded on the south by the Centennial
Mountains. The lowest level of the valley floor, through which the
Red Rock River flows westward, is about 6,400 feet, and Red Rock
Pass, at the east end of the valley, is about 7,000 feet. In the spring,
run-off from melting snow in the mountains provides many wet areas
in the meadows of wild hay, and it also supports several shallow lakes.
Specimens of palaceus are noted in the Bozeman laboratory records as
having been taken in two environments, one dominated by wiregrass
and the other by bluegrass.
Wiregrass (Juncus balticus) is dominant in extensive swales, or areas
of low marshy ground. In an average year the swales are wet with
slowly moving water until July, and some arms remain wet until late
July or early August. The bluegrass areas include two or more species
of Poa, as well as species of Hordeum and Puccinella. Greasewood
(Scarcobatus) also occurs. These bluegrass areas are much drier than
the wiregrass swales, but often are adjacent to the latter or appear as
islands in their midst. They are green and succulent in spring and
early summer, but by mid-July the grasses usually have matured and
are light straw-colored or almost white. Both these environments are
considered steps in the development of the grassland climax, as con-
trasted with the sagebrush climax in other parts of the valley.
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS Sl
Melanoplus borealis utahensis Scudder, new combination
FicureEs 8,b,g; 9,e; 10,e; 11,e; 16,f; 18; PLatE 4,8
Melanoplus utahensis Scudder, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. 36 (154), pp. 19, 32’
1897; Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, pp. 132, 167-168, pl. 11, fig. 10, 1897
(1 male, Salt Lake Valley, Utah).
The unique male type, cited by Rehn and Hebard (1912, p. 79), is
labeled ‘S. L. Val. Utah 8-30’; “L. Bruner Collector’; “Drawn”;
“Mel. utahensis Scudder’s Type, 1895.” Also, the specimen bears a
Bruner manuscript label and more recently attached type labels and
comments on type locality (USNM).
Neither precise type locality nor the year of the type’s capture is
definitely known. When Hebard examined the type, probably in the
late 1920’s, he attached a label reading “From a western canyon of the
Wasatch Mts., back from Ogden.”” A male and female from a series
of four specimens from Ogden in the Philadelphia (ANSP) collection
were labeled by Hebard as topotypes. Each of these bears a printed
label “Ogden, Utah,” and one male is labeled “‘Melanoplus utahensis
Bruner, Type spec.,”’ apparently in Bruner’s handwriting. The pair
labeled as topotypes by Hebard bear the further notation “Taken w.
type,” added by Hebard. Neither in Scudder’s revision nor elsewhere
have we found any information relating to these four specimens. It
may be that Bruner did not send them to Scudder for inclusion in the
revision and that, although Bruner gave them a manuscript name,
they were not studied again until his North American collection be-
came available to Hebard. Scudder referred to the Bruner manuscript
name when wtahensis was described, and the unique type has a Bruner
name label like the one on the Ogden male. These labels may have
led Hebard to assume that the whole series was taken together.
Unless more information supporting Hebard’s opinion becomes
available, it seems logical to conclude from the itinerary discussed by
Bruner (1890) that the type was collected near Salt Lake City in
1890, and that the Ogden specimens are not topotypes. In a report
to C. V. Riley dated Sept. 1, 1890, Bruner described a trip made in
August, primarily to Idaho. Near the end of the trip he went to
Ogden and Salt Lake City, ‘‘at both of which points collections were
made.’’ Thence, he went directly home to Lincoln, Nebr.; by train.
Because of the date on the specimen, August 30, it is probable that
the specimen was collected during Bruner’s last day in the field.
Since Big Cottonwood Canyon, where utahensis has been collected,
is within a few miles of Salt Lake City, that or a nearby area may
well have been the locality which Bruner visited. The 1890 trip is
the only one for which a record apparently satisfying the known
data has been found. The fact that the specimen was deposited in
47711959 6
82 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
the Riley collection, as recorded by Scudder, suggests that it was
taken while on a Federal assignment such as the one in 1890.
M. borealis utahensis, considered by Hebard (1928, p. 281) probably
to be a distinct species closely related to M. bruneri, is shown by the
aedeagus to belong instead to the borealis line of development.
Descriptive Notes: A nearly fully winged subspecies of medium to
large size in relation to other subspecies. Characterized especially in
the male by the posteriorly prolonged (as well as elevated) subgenital
plate. Tegmina failing by about 2 to 3 mm. to reach the tips of
hind femora and the end of the abdomen. Posterior third of abdomen
strongly upturned.
MALE GENITALIA: Cercus typically as in figure 8,b-1-2, sometimes
with the apex more obliquely rounded (fig. 8,b-3); furculae broad, in
holotype about as in figure 9,e-1, sometimes more tapering; subgenital
plate in lateral view extremely prolonged, somewhat variable in
shape (fig. 16,f), in posterior view with dorsal margin varying from
twice emarginate (fig. 11,e-1-3) to entire. Aedeagus as in borealis
borealis; epiphallus (fig. 8,g) with lophi somewhat oblique anteriorly
in dorsal view, in lateral view (fig. 10,e) rather flattened anteriorly.
FEMALE GENITALIA: Cercus about as in borealis borealis (fig. 10,1);
Ovipositor essentially as in b. borealis except that “scoop”’ of dorsal
valve averages slightly more excavate, with apex more upturned.
CoLoraTIon: Type with narrow yellowish green longitudinal stripes
on lateral carinae of pronotum, lower half of lateral lobe of pronotum
and lower part of head similar; metepisternal stripe conspicuously
yellowish; tegmen brown, unmarked; hind femur with external
paginal area light brown, paler toward base, dorsal surface with
three distinct dark bars, in addition to dark brown knee, external
surface ventrad of paginae pink, mesal surface tinged with pink;
hind tibia pink. Specimens from Big Cottonwood Canyon lighter-
colored than type, tegmina and dorsum of pronotum light brown,
most of remainder of body yellowish brown, hind tibia weak pinkish.
Variation: Measurements (in millimeters) of the holotype are:
Body, 27.0 (Scudder’s measurement) ; pronotum, 6.1; hind femur, 14.3;
and tegmen, 17.0 Specimens from Ogden average larger than those
from Big Cottonwood Canyon. Measurements of the Ogden speci-
mens are: Males (2), pronotum, 5.3, 5.5 (av. 5.4), hind femur, 12.0,
12.0 (av. 12.0), tegmen, 15.3, 18.8 (av. 17.1); females (2), pronotum,
5.7, 6.0 (av. 5.9), hind femur, 13.7, 14.7 (av. 14.2), tegmen, 12.5,
15.5 (av. 14.0). Measurements of representative Cottonwood Canyon
specimens are: Males (3), pronotum, 4.6 to 5.0 (av. 4.8), hind
femur, 11.4 to 11.6 (av. 11.5), tegmen, 11.3 to 11.8 (av. 11.5); females
(2), pronotum, 5.1, 5.3 (av. 5.2), hind femur, 12.4, 12.5 (av. 12.5),
tegmen, 12.3, 12.5 (av. 12.4).
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 83
The series from 3 miles north of Mantua, Utah, which was labeled
in the Philadelphia (ANSP) collection by Morgan Hebard as atypical
Melanoplus utahensis, is here considered intermediate between borealis
utahensis and b. palaceus. External male genitalia are as illustrated
(figs. 8,c; 9,6; 11,f; 16,9), and the subgenital plate suggests the inter-
mediate relationship of the population. The lophi of the epiphallus
are apically lanceolate in dorsal view, well flattened at the top in
lateral view. The general color of these specimens is dull yellowish
brown; hind tibiae are tinged with pink. The general color suggests
that of the Red Banks series of brwnert and may reflect comparable
ecological conditions.
Measurements (in millimeters) of representative Mantua speci-
mens are: Males (5), length of pronotum, 5.9 to 6.4 (av. 6.2), hind
femur, 12.4 to 14.2 (av. 13.5), tegmen, 12.5 to 15.5 (av. 14.3); females
(2), length of pronotum, 6.5, 7.0 (av. 6.8), hind femur, 14.8, 15.5 (av.
15.2), tezmen, 15.0, 16.0. (av. 15.5);
Disrrrsution: This grasshopper appears to be a relatively localized
subspecies of the northern Wasatch Mountains, and to be more or
less surrounded by M. borealis palaceus rather than being distributed
linearly adjacent to M. 6. palaceus. ‘There may be altitudinal differ-
ences also, so that material from additional localities is likely to
clarify the situation. Full data on all specimens examined are as
follows: Salt Lake Valley, Utah, Aug. 30, L. Bruner (10%, holotype) ;
Big Cottonwood Canyon, Wasatch Mts., Utah, 7,400 ft., Canadian
zone, Aug. 19, 1924, Rehn and Hebard (807, 82); Ogden, Utah
(207, 29).
Intermediate between Melanoplus borealis utahensis and M. 6.
palaceus: 3 miles north of Mantua, Box Elder Co., Utah, Wasatch
Mts., 5,800 ft., Aug. 9, 1928, Rehn & Hebard. (1867, 179, 1 juv. ¢&,
apparently 5th instar).
BIoLOGY AND ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE: We are indebted to Rehn
and Hebard for the only notes on the biology of this poorly known
grasshopper. In Big Cottonwood Canyon, Utah, on Aug. 18, 1924,
they found it in the Canadian zone at 7,400 feet, present ‘in moderate
numbers in lush herbage near stream on flat with much aspen and
spruce” (Hebard, 1936b, p. 173). Hebard also gave notes on a
grasshopper taken at Red Banks in Logan Canyon, and ascribed to
utahensis, but, as previously mentioned under M. bruneri, the only
specimens we have seen with corresponding data prove to be bruneri.
84 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
References
ALEXANDER, GORDON
1941. Keys for the identification of Colorado Orthoptera. Univ. Colorado
Studies, ser. p, vol. 1, pp. 129-164, 4 figs.
1951. The occurrence of Orthoptera at high altitudes, with special reference
to Colorado Acrididae. Ecology, vol. 32, pp. 104-112.
ANDER, KJELL
1949a. De boreoalpina Orthoptera. Ann. Ent. Fenn., vol. 14, suppl.,
pp. 48-55, 3 figs.
1949b. Die borioalpinen Orthopteren Europas. Opusc. Ent., vol. 14,
pp. 89-104, 4 figs.
Anprrson, N. L., anp Wricut, J. C.
1952. Grasshopper investigations on Montana range lands. Montana
Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 486, pp. 1-46, 6 tables.
ANDREWARTHA, H. G., AND Brreuw, L. C.
1954. The distribution and abundance of animals. 782 pp., illus.
AUER, VAINO
1930. Peat bogs in southeastern Canada. Canadian Dep. Mines Geol.
Surv. Mem. 162, pp. 1-32, 1 map, 3 profile sheets.
Batu, E. D.; TinxHam, E. R.; Fuock, Ropert; anp Vorutss, C. T.
1942. The grasshoppers and other Orthoptera of Arizona. Univ. Arizona
Tech. Bull. 93, pp. 257-373, 11 figs., 4 pls.
Barngs, O. L.
1955. Effect of food plants on the lesser migratory grasshopper. Journ.
Econ. Ent., vol. 48, pp. 119-124, 2 figs.
Betuunge, C. J. 8.
1875. Grasshoppers or locusts. Ann. Rep. Ent. Soc. Ontario 1874, pp.
29-42.
BuatTcHuey, W. S.
1920. Orthoptera of northeastern America. 784 pp., 246 figs.
Breer C2 A:
1947. Interrelated effects of food, temperature, and humidity on the
development of the lesser migratory grasshopper, Melanoplus
mexicanus mexicanus (Saussure). Oklahoma Agr. Exp. Sta.
Tech. Bull. T—26, pp. 1-50, 18 figs.
Brooks, A. R.
1958. Acridoidea of southern Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba.
Canadian Ent., vol. 90, suppl. 9, pp. 1-92, 128 figs.
Bruner, LAwRENCE
1883. Report of observations in the Northwest on the Rocky Mountain
locust. In U.S. Dep. Agr., Div. Ent. Bull. 2, pp. 7-22.
1885. Contributions to the north trans-continental survey. Canadian
Ent., vol. 17, pp. 9-19.
1886. Report on the abundance of the Rocky Mountain locust in 1885.
U.S. Dep. Agr., Rep. Ent., 1885, pp. 303-307.
1890. Report on a local outbreak of grasshoppers in Idaho. Insect Life,
vol. 3, pp. 135-141.
1893a. The more destructive locusts of America north of Mexico. U. S.
Dep. Agr., Div. Ent. Bull. 28, pp. 1-40, 21 figs.
1893b. Report upon insect injuries in Nebraska during the summer of 1892.
U.S. Dep. Agr., Div. Ent. Bull. 30, pp. 34-35.
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 85
1908. Melanoplus. In Godman and Salvin, Biologia Centrali-Americana,
Orthoptera, vol. 2, pp. 317-327.
BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, C.
1861. Orthopterologische Studien. Verh. Zool. Bot. Gesell., Wien, vol.
11, pp. 221-228.
1900. Orthoptera. Jn Von Ihrer, Konig]. Hoheit der Prinzessin Therese
von Bayern auf einer Reise in Sudamerika gesammelte Insekten.
Berliner Ent. Zeit., vol. 45, pp. 253-258, 1 pl.
Bucke., E. R.
1921. Notes on the ecological distribution of some Orthoptera from the
Chilcotin District of British Columbia. Proc. Ent. Soc. British
Columbia, syst. ser., no. 18, pp. 32-38.
1922. A list of the Orthoptera and Dermaptera recorded from British
Columbia prior to the year 1922, with annotations. Proc. Ent.
Soc. British Columbia, syst. ser., no. 20, pp. 9-41.
Burks, B. D.
1953. The mayflies, or Ephemeroptera, of Illinois. Bull. Ill. Nat. Hist.
Surv., vol. 26, pp. 1-216, 395 figs.
CanTRALL, IrvING J.
1943. The ecology of the Orthoptera and Dermaptera of the George Re-
serve, Michigan. Univ. Michigan Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool., vol.
54, pp. 1-182, 10 pls.
CanTRALL, Irvine J., AND YOUNG, FRANK
1954. Contrasts in the orthopteran faunas of grassland, forest, and transi-
tional areas in southern Indiana, Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci.,
vol. 63, pp. 157-162.
CaupeE.., A. N.
1900. Orthoptera. (Papers from the Harriman Alaska Expedition, XV.)
Proc. Washington Acad. Sci., vol. 2, pp. 511-512.
1903. Notes on Orthoptera from Colorado, New Mexico, Arizona, and
Texas, with descriptions of new species. Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus.,
vol. 26, pp. 775-809, 1 pl.
1908. Notes on some western Orthoptera; with the description of one new
species. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., vol. 34, pp. 71-81.
1915. Notes on some United States grasshoppers of the family Acrididae.
Proc. U. 8. Nat. Mus., vol. 49, pp. 25-31.
CockKERELL, T. D. A.
1888. Entomological work in Colorado. Entomologist, vol. 21, pp. 298-305.
1889. On the variation of insects. Entomologist, vol. 22, pp. 125-130.
Coaquituert, D. W.
1892. Report on the locust invasion of California in 1891. U.S. Dep. Agr.,
Div. Ent., Bull. 27, pp. 34-57.
Cootey, R. A.
1904a. Notes on a grasshopper outbreak in Montana. U.S. Dep. Agr.,
Div. Ent. Bull. 46, pp. 41-43.
1940b. First annual report of the State Entomologist of Montana. Montana
Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 51, pp. 199-274.
1918. Fifteenth annual report of the State Entomologist of Montana.
Montana Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 124, pp. 195-208.
1925. Montana insect pests for 1923 and 1924. Univ. Montana Bull. 170,
pp. 1-30.
86 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Corkins, C. L.
1922. Notes on the migration of Melanoplus atlanis Riley in northern North
Dakota in 1920. Canadian Ent., vol. 54, pp. 1-4.
CRIDDLE, NORMAN
1917. Precipitation in relation to insect prevalence and distribution.
Canadian Ent., vol. 49, pp. 77-80.
1918. The egg-laying habits of some of the Acrididae. Canadian Ent., vol.
50, pp. 145-151.
1924. Notes on the early stages of grasshoppers. Canadian Ent., vol. 56,
pp. 49-53.
Dirsu, V. M.
1953. Morphometrical studies on phases of the desert locust. Anti-Locust
Bull. 16, pp. 1-34, 31 figs.
1956. The phallic complex in Acridoidea (Orthoptera) in relation to the
taxonomy. ‘Trans. Ent. Soc. London, vol. 108, pp. 223-356, 66 pls.
Dopag, G. M.
1876. New species of Acridini from Nebraska. Canadian Ent., vol. 8,
pp. 9-12.
1878. Variations in the wing expanse of Pezotettiz. Canadian Ent., vol. 10,
pp. 103-105.
Drake, C. J., AND TauBsER, O. E.
1946. The history of grasshoppers and locusts in Iowa. Iowa Yearbook
Agr., 1945, pp. 177-199, illus.
Essie, E. O.
1926. Insects of western North America. 1035 pp., 766 figs.
Faure, J. C.
1933. The phases of the Rocky Mountain locust Melanoplus mexicanus
(Saussure). Journ. Econ. Ent., vol. 26, pp. 706-718, 1 pl.
FIEBER, F. X.
1853. Synopsis der europaischen Orthopteren mit besonderer Rucksicht
der Bohmischen Arten. Lotus, vol. 3, pp. 90-104, 115-129, 138-154,
168-176, 184-188, 201-207, 232-238, 252-261. (Separate, pp. 1-78,
issued in 1854.)
Fox, HENRY
1917. Field notes on Virginia Orthoptera. Proc. U. 8. Nat. Mus., vol. 52,
pp. 199-234.
FRIAUF, JAMES J.
1953. An ecological study of the Dermaptera and Orthoptera of the Welaka
area in northern Florida. Ecol. Monogr., vol. 23, pp. 79-126, 17 figs.
Frison, T. H.
1927. A list of the insect types in the collection of the Hlinois State Natural
History Survey and the University of Illinois. Bull. Illinois Nat.
Hist. Surv., vol. 16, pp. 137-309.
FROESCHNER, R. C.
1954. The grasshoppers and other Orthoptera of Iowa. Iowa State Coll.
Journ. Sci., vol. 29, pp. 163-354, 9 pls.
Futon, B. B.
1930. Notes on Oregon Orthoptera with descriptions of new species and
races. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer., vol. 23, pp. 611-641, figs. 1-3.
GauMER, Gro. F.
1878. In, Riley, Packard, and Thomas, Ist Ann. Rep. U. 8. Ent. Comm.,
appendix 5, Pp. 85-88.
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 87
GoLpMAN, Epwarp A.
1951. Biological investigations in Mexico. Smithsonian Misc. Coll., vol.
115, pp. 1-476, pls. 1-70, map.
Griscom, LupLow, anp FouagEr, Epiru V.
1948. The birds of Nantucket. 156 pp., illus.
GuRNEY, ASHLEY B.
1935. Western Massachusetts Orthoptera, Pt. 1. Preliminary list of the
Acrididae. Canadian Ent., vol. 67, pp. 185-188.
1941. Taxonomic and bionomic notes on the grasshopper Melanoplus
impudicus Scudder. Amer. Midl. Nat., vol. 26, pp. 558-569,
25 figs.
1953. Grasshopper Glacier of Montana and its relation to long-distance
flights of grasshoppers. Ann. Rep. Smithsonian Inst. 1952, pp.
305-325, 8 pls.
Hanprorp, R. H.
1946. The identification of nymphs of the genus Melanoplus of Manitoba
and adjacent areas. Sci. Agr., vol. 26, pp. 147-180, 1 fig., 12 pls.
Harper, Rosert W.
1952. Grasshoppers of economic importance in California. California
Dep. Agr. Bull., vol. 41, pp. 153-175, illus.
HEBARD, MorGan
1909. Additional notes on the Orthoptera of the Keeweenaw Bay Region
of Baraga Co., Mich. Ent. News, vol. 20, pp. 155-158.
1917. Notes on Mexican Melanopli (Orthoptera, Acrididae). Proc. Acad.
Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, vol. 67, pp. 251-275, 5 figs.
1925a. The Orthoptera of South Dakota. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila-
delphia, vol. 77, pp. 33-155, 2 figs., 1 map.
1925b. Dermaptera and Orthoptera from the State of Sinaloa, Mexico,
Pt. 2. Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc., vol. 51, pp. 265-310, pls. 7, 8.
1927. Fixation of the single types of species of Orthoptera deser bed by
Cyrus Thomas. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, vol. 79, pp.
1-11.
1928. The Orthoptera of Montana. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia,
vol. 80, pp. 211-306, 2 pls.
1929. The Orthoptera of Colorado. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia,
vol. 81, pp. 303-425, 1 pl.
1930. The Orthoptera of Alberta. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia,
vol. 82, pp. 377-403.
1931. The Orthoptera of Kansas. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia,
vol. 83, pp. 119-227, 2 figs., 2 maps.
1932a. New species and records of Mexican Orthoptera. Trans. Amer. Ent.
Soc., vol. 58, pp. 201-371, pls. 17-21.
1932b. The Orthoptera of Minnesota. Minnesota Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech.
Bull. 85, pp. 1-61.
1934a. Notes on Orthoptera from northwestern Minnesota. Ent. News,
vol. 45, pp. 103-106.
1934b. The Dermaptera and Orthoptera of Illinois. Bull. Illinois Nat. Hist.
Surv., vol. 20, pp. 125-279, 167 figs.
1935a. Orthoptera of the Upper Rio Grande Valley and the adjacent moun-
tains of northern New Mexico. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia;
vol. 87, pp. 45-82, 3 figs.
88 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
1935b. Studies in the Orthoptera of Arizona. Pt.2. A list of the Dermaptera
and Orthoptera with new records and corrections of the literature
subsequent to 1909. Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc., vol. 61, pp. 269-316.
1936a. Notes on North American Orthoptera of the Arctic-Alpine Zone.
Ent. News, vol. 47, pp. 13-15.
1936b. New genera and species of Melanopli found within the United States
and Canada. Pts. 8, 9. Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc., vol. 62, pp.
167-222, 6 pls.
1936c. Orthoptera of North Dakota. North Dakota Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull.
284, pp. 1-66, 1 map.
1945. Orthoptera of the Appalachian Mountains in the vicinity of Hot
Springs, Virginia. Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc., vol. 71, pp. 77-97.
HENRIKSEN, K. L.
1939. A revised index of the insects of Grgnland. Medd. Grgnland, vol.
119, pp. 1-112.
HENRIKSEN, K. L., anpD LUNDBECK, W.
1917. Landarthropoder (Insecta et Arachnida). Medd. Grgnland, vol. 22,
pp. 481-823.
Herrick, GLENN W., AND Haptey, C. H.
1916. The lesser migratory locust. Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull.
378, pp. 1-45, 17 figs., 6 pls.
Hornapay, WriiuraM T.
1889. The extermination of the American bison. Rep. U. S. Nat. Mus.
1886-1887, pp. 369-548, pls. 1-22.
Husset., T. H.
1922. Notes on the Orthoptera of North Dakota. Occ. Papers Mus.
Zool., Univ. Michigan, vol. 118, pp. 1-56.
1932. Arevision of the Puer Group of the North American genus Melanoplus,
with remarks on the taxonomic value of the concealed male geni-
talia in the Cyrtacanthacrinae. Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool., Univ.
Michigan, vol. 23, pp. 1-64, 1 fig., 4 pls.
Iszeiy, F. B.
1937. Seasonal succession, soil relations, numbers, and regional distribution
of northeastern Texas acridians. Ecol. Monogr., vol. 7, pp. 317-
344, 6 figs.
1938. The relation of Texas Acrididae to plants and soils. Ecol. Monogr.,
vol. 8, pp. 551-604, 7 figs.
JENNINGS, O. E.
1909. A botanical survey of Presque Isle, Erie County, Pennsylvania.
Ann. Carnegie Mus., vol. 5, pp. 289-421, 4 maps, pls. 22-51.
Kine, R. L., AND SuirEr, E. H.
1955. The inheritance of red and blue hind tibiae in the lesser migratory
grasshopper, Melanoplus mexicanus mexicanus (Saussure). Journ.
Hered., vol. 46, pp. 302-304.
KNABEN, NILS
1943. Oversikt over Norges Orthoptera. Bergen Mus. Arbok. Nat. Rek,
vol. 2, pp. 1-43.
Kimsiz, Grorce, H. T., anp Goop, Dorotuy
1955. Geography of the northlands. 534 pp., 47 figs., 75 pls., 1 sep. map.
Kirsy, W. F.
1910. A synonymic catalogue of Orthoptera. Vol. 3, 674 pp.
GRASSHOPPERS—GURNEY AND BROOKS 89
KozHAntsuHikoy, I. V.
1956. On the peculiarities of the diapause in eggs of acridian Orthoptera.
Ent. Obozr. (Rev. d’Ent. de l’URSS), vol. 35, pp. 28-42.
La Rivers, Ira
1948. A synopsis of Nevada Orthoptera. Amer. Midl. Nat., vol. 39,
pp. 652-720.
Less, A. D.
1955. The physiology of diapause in arthropods. Cambridge Monogr.
Exp. Biol., vol. 4, pp. 1-151, 25 figs.
Lippy, W. F.
1954. Chicago radiocarbon dates, IV. Science, vol. 119, pp. 135-140.
MacCartnay, H. R.
1956. ‘ith alan
i . bon ; Vikas sti ae ey ist: ZS
YY 1 , Pa
ae i ; slot i wt } i rs ae) ; FAs is ity (PeMEUL Out ay, ; yi ae y nay a aa
7 bene MY Sack ipaghe Stl ee say
e nm | doy a hyo * thaghare nt m. ; A Mi i AY " : Agr ucyethind
i 7 a wake [tA int vod) FOU trh ek ANS 9
be ANE che eson, og aieeh sel sea itt ni aN
= in + Ms iy .L ty att amt
; ' a
; motion? 9+ ath fe eased ee, he pce Seo carr ret air Hes i ah ee
rn r -~ Oe eh et ours, ips ag FN dy 19,
Ve
dak LCDI Sides MIE Ae Mase net ied oveerteln
- ti , fe Aieave" ree | on 7 Ziv lineitimat i
eds ney Hero dtl h i es AA CSAS IPA TLE ites
AML eRe MO. ca,
Von. HMMS
1 ous Vibes PA 1 ike ’ ot bl itt ait itv io. dba if
§ ri , 1 & e
cis
. a - - a sik a Wy fue 6 y
Jae Dil T yh Say By Se nul # POO i Og ae faenn vi 7
2
= ec ite- ee
Or Gea 34 oh oe ex ‘tit
ia @ | ny '
AC 7 ae a I ba,
_f P oe ; I f i -
AO SIL PA, een { a] Ti ey = L ire ae ee Lor UFO act ag
: 1 1
! eee 1 ‘| Oey
“ Mi
oe au
win) i) Got Aa! arr oa hyve
4 « ad
. a, Rife
sagt BNE ay ee. ee bs SERE ny ried a]
é alr C iy ’
wre ; H
ray i hii
1 ' Atay oa nih PP te ryekt
; i i—e 7
i
{ - »
y ye a i] 7!
} t
‘ }
a
Plates 1=5
ie a aaa |
f
PROC. U.S. NAT. MUS. VOL. 110 GURNEY AND BROOKS, PLATE 1
a, Melanoplus mexicanus, male, La Cumbre, Mexico. B, c, .M. bilituratus bilituratus,
males: B, from Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada; c, from Claydon, Saskatche-
wan, Canada. pb, £, M. bilituratus vulturnus, females: p, from Stony Man Mountain,
Shenandoah National Park, Va.; ©. from Independence, Kans.
PROC. U.S. NAT. MUS. VOL. 110 GURNEY AND BROOKS, PLATE 2
A-C, Melanoplus bilituratus defectus: a, male from Pendleton’s Ranch, 4 miles south of
fumaeacori, Ariz.; 8, male from Tempe, Ariz., reared: c, female from Chandler, Ariz.
T1Z.; J pe,
b, M. spretus, female from Iowa, 1873.
PROC. U.S. NAT. MUS. VOL, 110 GURNEY AND BROOKS, PLATE
,, Melanoplus brunert, male, from Sheridan County, Wyo. 8, ¢, M. devastator: B, male,
from Folsom, Calif.; c, female from El Dorado County., Calif.
PROC. U.S. NAT. MUS. VOL. 110 GURNEY AND BROOKS, PLATE 4
A, Melanoplus bilituratus defectus, male, from Chandler, Ariz. B, M. borealis utahensis,
male, from Ogden, Utah. _c, male, intermediate between M. borealis utahensis and M. borealis
palaceus, from 3 miles north of Mantua, Utah. ov, M. borealis palaceus, male, holotype.
GURNEY AND BROOKS, PLATE 5
110
PROG? UseSe NAgieMUS VO:
‘OOD “SoIquing, fo You yvod wold} ‘O[PULOF “A ne) e@) “AquNOD) [eLoulpY WLOLf “O] EU “al
esnjov fagnys S1]Da40G “J “A “A “OOD “XOQUIO J, Wolf “OTe UL ‘snaov]og ‘a°W pure ‘sngovfadnjs ‘qa °W ‘S1]D940G S$1]D240G ‘JT UIIMI9d IVIPIWIOJUT “I “YpeRUvd
“IOpev.qey ‘UIvNy WIOlf “a sUQGOUUvy]Y ‘UIvAaSSIOG, UO “HM SSOLIOPIIO TT, ISOMUYIION odaq Td9pUlOY] WO] “WV iSo[PUl *S17/DA40q S1]D240g snd ouv)a jy a RON
nee
7
tf
PROCEEDINGS OF THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM
Nhe
Ge! SS AN
Re
fig ee ANo,
oY
ie
=z,
oR
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
U.S. NATIONAL MUSEUM
Vol. 110 Washington : 1959 No. 3417
A REVISION OF AMERICAN BATS
OF THE GENERA EUDERMA AND PLECOTUS
By Cartes O. Hanp ey, JR.
Introduction
Confusion and damage to nomenclatural stability are consequences
of taxonomic revisions that do not provide adequate explanations or
justifications for proposed changes in nomenclature. They are ig-
nored, accepted with reservation, or blindly followed by those who
have occasion to use them. Confusion of this sort involves a wide-
spread American bat, now referred to in literature either as Cory-
norhinus or Plecotus. The purpose of this paper is to clarify the status
of this bat and its American and Eurasian relatives (particularly
Euderma), to assay the evolution of the group, to map geographic
distributions, and to bring together the literature on natural history of
the group.
The genera Euderma and Plecotus are vespertilionid bats with ex-
ceptionally large ears. They are known colloquially as mule-eared
bats, jack-rabbit bats, or, simply, big-eared bats, or long-eared bats.
Some species are referred to as lump-nosed bats. Plecotus, as here
understood, includes the American Jdionycteris and Corynorhinus as
subgenera.
Perhaps the earliest published reference to an American big-eared
bat was that of Clayton (1694, p. 124) in his remarks on the “‘beasts
of Virginia”: ‘Batts, as I remember at least two sorts; one a large
95
96 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
sort with long Ears, and particularly long stragling hairs. The other
much like the English, something larger I think, very common.”’
There is now an extensive American literature on Huderma and
Plecotus, but most reports contain little more than records of speci-
mens. The only revisionary works have been those of H. Allen (1864,
1894), Miller (1897), and G. Allen (1916). Most of our knowledge
of the anatomy and physiology of the group is included in the papers
of Larsell and Dow (1935) and Pearson, Koford, and Pearson (1952).
The few life history studies are generally superficial; those of Dalquest
(1947), Pearson, et al. (1952), and Twente (1955) are notable excep-
tions. Much yet remains to be learned about Huderma and the Ameri-
can populations of Plecotus.
These bats occur in most temperate portions of the Northern
Hemisphere. They are generally scarce. In America, Huderma is
known by 16 specimens, the subgenus IJdionycteris is known by less
than a dozen specimens, all but two of them collected since 1955; and
perhaps no other North American bat with such an extensive geo-
eraphic range as the subgenus Corynorhinus has been collected so in-
frequently. Species of the latter subgenus are known to occur from
the Atlantic to the Pacific and from Canada to the Isthmus of Tehuan-
tepec in Mexico. This wide geographic range is deceptive, however,
for these bats display narrow limits of tolerance in their choice of
habitat. Within the bounds of their ranges are large areas in which
they apparently do not occur, and others in which they occur only
sparingly. There are few areas in which they are common.
MATERIALS
The scarcity of Euderma and Plecotus in America is evident from
the small number of museum specimens listed in the early reviews.
H. Allen’s 1864 monograph included only 18 specimens, and his 1894
monograph only 19. For Miller’s 1897 revision, 43 examples were
available. G. Allen’s 1916 review was based on a total of 126 speci-
mens.
The material from which I have drawn my conclusions concerning
these bats consists of four dry skins and skulls and a single specimen
preserved in alcohol representing Huderma; three specimens of the
subgenus Jdionycteris, dry skins and skulls; 25 dry skins and skulls,
two skeletons, and 32 specimens preserved in alcohol, representing at
least five races of the subgenus Plecotus; and about 800 specimens (see
species accounts for type of preservation) representing all the named
forms of the subgenus Corynorhinus.
In the course of the study I have examined enough specimens to
define Huderma and American Plecotus, but have not attempted to
assemble all available specimens. Those examined are in the collec-
tions of the following:
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 97
American Museum of Natural History
(AMNH)
Albert Schwartz (private collection)
(AS)
California Institute of Technology
(CIT)
Carlsbad Caverns National Park (CC)
Charleston (South Carolina) Museum
(ChM)
Carnegie Museum (CM)
Chicago Natural History Museum
(CNHM)
W. Gene Frum (private collection)
(GF)
Instituto de Biologia, Universidad Na-
cional Auté6noma de México (IB)
Illinois Natural History Survey
(INHS)
University of Kansas
Natural History (KU)
Louisiana State University Museum
of Zoology (LSU)
Harvard University Museum of Com-
parative Zoology (MCZ)
University of California Museum of
Vertebrate Zoology (MVZ)
Oklahoma A. & M. College (OAM)
Museum of
Ohio State Museum (OSM)
School of Tropical and Preventive
Medicine, Loma Linda, Calif.
(STPM)
Texas A. & M. College (Texas Co-
operative Wildlife Collection)
(TCWC)
Texas State Department of Health,
Austin, Tex. (TSDH)
Texas Technological College (TT)
University of Arkansas Department of
Zoology (UAZ)
University of Illinois Museum of Nat-
ural History (UI)
University of Kentucky Zoology De-
partment (UK)
University of Michigan Museum of
Zoology (UMMZ)
University of Oklahoma Museum of
Zoology (UOMZ)
U.S. National Museum (including
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s
Biological Surveys collection)
(USNM)
University of Utah Museum of Zool-
ogy (UU)
I express sincere thanks and appreciation to the owners of private
collections and to the museum authorities who kindly loaned speci-
mens for my study. To those at the American Museum of Natural
History and at the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard Univer-
sity, I am particularly grateful. I am indebted to Seth B. Benson,
Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, and to
Rollin H. Baker and E. Raymond Hall, Museum of Natural History,
University of Kansas, for the loan of specimens set aside for their
personal study. Special thanks are due to John A. Sealander, Univer-
sity of Arkansas, for allowing me to utilize specimens under his care
in the description of a new subspecies, and for his kindness in depositing
the type specimen in the U.S. National Museum; and to Aurelio
Malaga Alba, Pan American Sanitary Bureau, for his cooperation in
securing much needed Mexican specimens, one of which has served
as the type of a new subspecies. The Fish and Wildlife Service,
U.S. Department of the Interior, has generously allowed me to utilize
from its files the unpublished field notes of its collectors.
The following individuals contributed information and other assist-
ance for which I am grateful: R. W. Barbour, F. L. Burnett, W. W.
Dalquest, W. G. Frum, A. F. Ganier, Helen Gaylord, B. P. Glass,
Woodrow Goodpaster, R. M. Goslin, Iracy O. Handley, R. H. Hand-
98 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
ley, H. B. Hitchcock, Patricia Isham, E. V. Komarek, Barbara
Lawrence, R. E. Mumford, Thelma Reid, C. C. Sanborn, William
Schaldach, Jr., Albert Schwartz, P. M. Smith, P. W. Smith, Arthur
Stupka, Robert Traub, Bernardo Villa R., and F. N. Young.
I am thankful to the persons who reviewed the manuscript and
offered helpful criticism and advice: A. M. Elliott, C. W. Hibbard,
EK. T. Hooper, Remington Kellogg, D. H. Johnson, H. W. Setzer,
A. H. Smith, and C. F. Walker.
MeETHODS
In tables 7-18 cranial and external measurements, in millimeters.
are given for Huderma maculatum, Plecotus auritus, Plecotus phyllotis,
and for all the races of the subgenus Corynorhinus. Females are
significantly larger than males in these bats. Accordingly, measure-
ments for the two sexes are tabulated separately. Only adults, as
determined by ossification of the finger joints and appearance of the
skull, were measured.
Measurements of Huderma are from the following sources: Ashcraft
(1932, p. 162), Durrant (1952, pp. 59, 66), Nicholson (1950, p. 197),
Parker (1952, p. 480), Stager (1957, p. 260), and four specimens
measured by me.
External measurements of Plecotus, except of the forearm, are those
taken by the collectors. JI measured the forearm (greatest length of
radius-ulna including carpals) on the preserved specimens. All cranial
measurements (fig. 1) were taken with dial calipers and the aid of a
binocular microscope in the following manner:
Greatest length: Distance, on the diagonal, from the anteriormost border of the
premaxilla to the posterior limit of the supraoccipital; incisors are excluded.
Zygomatic breadth: Greatest distance between the outer borders of the zygomatic
arches.
Interorbital breadth: Least diameter of the interorbital constriction of the
frontals.
Brain case breadth: Distance, measured above the auditory bullae, between the
lateral limits of the parietals.
Brain case depth: Distance between the dorsal extreme of the skull and the
ventral limit of the occipitosphenoid plate; auditory bullae are excluded. One
bar of the calipers lies flat on the occipitosphenoid plate; the other is in
contact with the top of the brain case.
Maxillary tooth row: Distance between the anterior edge of the canine and the
posterior border of the third molar.
Postpalatal length: Distance from the anterior limit of the mesopterygoid fossa
to the ventral lip of the foramen magnum.
Palatal breadth: Distance between the lateral extremes of M3.
Presence or absence of a secondary cusp in I! was indexed according
to the following scale (fig. 2):
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 99
0, Secondary cusp absent; no trace.
1, Secondary cusp incipient, in the form of a shoulder, not separated from primary
cusp by a notch.
2, Secondary cusp present, separated from primary cusp by a notch.
Frequently, the degree of development of the secondary cusp of I!
is not the same on both sides. When absent in one tooth and incipient
in the other, it was indexed as 0.5; when absent in one and present
in the other, as 1; when incipient in one and present in the other,
as 1.5; etc.
The degree of development of the secondary cusp in each population
was determined by averaging individual indexes. Thus, a population
GREATEST LENGTH
BRAIN CASE
DEPTH
— BRAIN CASE
BREADTH
ZYGOMATIG
BREADTH INTERORBITAL
BREADTH
PALATAL
BREADTH
POSTPALATAL LENGTH
Ficure 1.—Cranial measurements of Euderma and Plecotus.
100 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Vays
6) 1 2
Ficure 2.—Degrees of development of the secondary cusp in the first upper incisor
(anterolateral view).
with an incisor cusp index of 0 lacks the secondary cusp. An index
of 1 indicates some development of the secondary cusp, and so on.
Throughout the text, relative proportions are expressed as per-
centages of the greatest length of the skull.
Color was measured in diffused white fiuorescent light, without
direct natural light. Capitalized color terms in the text are from
Ridgway (1912). There appears to be no sexual dichromatism or
seasonal variation in coloration. If such exists, it is so slight that,
except in cases of extremely worn pelage, it can be disregarded in
comparisons.
The type of preservation of the specimens examined is indicated
in the species accounts by the following abbreviations: a, alcoholic; b,
bones (skeleton) ; and s, skin and skull.
DENTAL NOMENCLATURE
The nomenclature of cusps and the numerical designation of teeth,
as used in this paper, are outlinediin figure 3. The naming of the
individual teeth requires further eculenvGon
The complete primitive dentition of adult placental mammals is a
set of 44 teeth:
3-3 1-1 4-4 3-3
Lee ee ey
The nearest approach to this in bats is a set of 38 teeth, lacking one
upper incisor and one upper and one lower premolar in each jaw:
3-3 ae
cx a Pe 3, MS
Incisors: Which of the incisors it is that is always missing in
Chiroptera is a matter of controversy. Most authors have believed
without much doubt that the consistently missing incisor is the first.
According to Miller (1907, p. 27) this is indicated, as shown by Winge, by the
correspondence of the two upper teeth with the two outer of the lower jaw when
the maximum set is present, and also, even more strongly, by the general tendency
throughout the group for the premaxillaries to become reduced, particularly
along the inner edge. This would inevitably result in eliminating that part of
the bone in which the first incisor grows.
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 101
PARACONE PROTOCONE
(PROTOCONE) (DEUTEROGONE)
MESOSTYLE HY POCONE
(TRITOCONE) (TETAR TOCONE)
PARACONE PROTOCONE
ME TACONE HYPOCONE
PARASTYLE ————__
m2
MESOSTYLE
1ST GOMMISSURE
2ND GOMMISSURE
3RD COMMISSURE
METASTYLE
CINGULUM
METACONID
(TRITOGONID)
PROTOCONID PARACONID
PROTOGONID METACONID
HYPOCONID ENTOCONID
Ss \-———- rriconio
| cecal
Figure 3.—Nomenclature of teeth of Plecotus. Right upper dentition (above) and left
lower dentition (below).
There are many objections to the belief that the permanently
missing incisor is I’, and no really substantial evidence as to which,
if either, of the others it may be. However, what evidence there is
favors the theory that the missing tooth may be I’.
The deciduous dentition does not contribute information on the
lost tooth. No more than two upper incisors have been observed in
any normal chiropteran deciduous dentition. For the Vespertilionidae,
the formula is the same in all of the genera for which it is known:
=22-
. 2-2 1-1 2-2
di 3-3” de = dp 3-2
102 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
On the basis of an abnormal supernumerary deciduous incisor in
Myotis lucifugus, Stegeman (1956, p. 60) postulated that the normally
missing tooth may beI?. G. Allen (1916, p. 335) described a specimen
of Plecotus townsend (USMN 150273) with three upper permanent
incisors. The “extra’’ incisor was the outermost of the three and
differed in form from the other two. Allen speculated that this
might represent a long lost I.
The uniform absence of a tooth throughout a group as large and
as varied as the Chiroptera compels the impression that the absence
is a characteristic dating from the dawn of development of the group
and subsequently shared by all derivatives. It is doubtful that
deviations from such a deep-seated characteristic, such as the devia-
tions reported by Allen and by Stegeman, can be assumed to represent
a reversion to an even more primitive long lost characteristic.
An example of a clearly abnormal extra incisor may be seen in
a specimen of P. mericanus (KU 29858). In place of the right outer
upper incisor there are two closely approximated twin teeth, neither
of which resembles the normal outer incisor in the left premaxilla.
Investigation of the factors now operating to cause reduction and
loss of the remaining incisors in Recent bats may give clues to the
incisor missing throughout the order. As noted above, Miller,
following Winge, supposed that reduction of the inner portion of the
premaxillary bone left the innermost incisor without a place for its
root. However, although all bats lack one upper incisor, not all bats
have the tooth-bearing portions of the premaxilaries reduced. There-
fore, if the same incisor is missing in all bats, then reduction of the
premaxillaries can not always account for the loss.
Actually, several evolutionary trends may account for crowding
and subsequent reduction and loss of incisors. In forms with an
extensible tongue, the action of the tongue may be a responsible agent.
In others, a narrowing of the rostrum and mandibles, an enlargement
of the canines, or a reduction of the tooth-bearing portions of the
premaxillaries may be a cause.
The result of these processes is always the same. It is not the
reduction and loss of the innermost of the two remaining incisors, but
a crowding of both toward the canine. A consequence of this crowding
is conflict of the outermost incisor with the occluding lower canine.
Further alternative consequences are reduction of the lower canine,
diminution or obliteration of the outermost upper incisor, anterior
or posterior displacement of the outermost incisor, rotation of the
outermost incisor to a narrower axis, elevation of the rostrum, or
depression of the mandible. All of these conditions may be observed
in Recent bats. It is important to note that in all Chiroptera it is
invariably the outer of the two remaining incisors that is reduced in
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 103
size and apparently is the first to disappear. It is most reasonable
to assume that these same factors may have operated to eliminate the
missing incisor. The first to go then, at a very early stage of
chiropteran development, was probably I°. This is in agreement with
Andersen’s (1908, p. 205) and Thomas’ (1908, p. 348) criticisms of
Miller’s conclusions.
PREMOLARS: Since the number of premolars in each maxilla and
mandible in all known bats is at least one less than the primitive
placental number, it is assumed that one has been lost from each jaw.
Thomas (1908, p. 347) argued convincingly that the missing tooth is
the second. Miller (1907, p. 28), without proof, arbitrarily assumed
it to be the first. Evidence at hand possibly supports Miller’s thesis.
A specimen of Plecotus townsend (USNM 81647) has four premolars
in one mandible; the other ramus is normal. ‘The extra tooth is on
the lingual side of the tooth row, adjacent to the normal anterior
premolar and forcing that tooth to the labial side of the row. Both
teeth touch the canine. The extra tooth is smaller than the normal
anterior premolar and rather like P; in size and shape. If it were to
be assumed that this extra tooth reflects a primitive condition in
which the normal mandible bore four premolars, then it would be
necessary, because of its position, to assume that the extra tooth is P.
However, the argument refuting similar evidence for the missing
incisor can be applied with equal propriety here.
Besides lacking, as do all bats, P2 in maxilla and mandible, Huderma
and Plecotus also lack another maxillary premolar. In this instance
the missing tooth is probably P?. An examination of Myotis in this
connection proves instructive. This genus normally lacks only a
single premolar, assumed to be the second, in each jaw. In some forms
the remaining premolars normally are not even crowded (e.g., MM.
lucifugus). However, other forms (e.g., MM. occultus) frequently lack
two premolars in each jaw. The tooth that is variable in occurrence
is the third premolar. In 15 specimens of M. occultus P* was present
in 4, absent in 11; P; was present in 14, absent in 1. P* normally is
absent in Plecotus, but occasionally is present (USNM 265387,
297711). In these specimens P* is present in only one maxilla, is
similar to P! but is smaller, and is wedged between P! and P* (postero-
internal to P!, on the lingual border of the tooth row). The “‘extra”’
tooth in each instance is similar in form and position to P*® of Myotis
occultus. ‘These teeth perhaps represent the normal third premolar
and not merely abnormal accessory teeth. They thus may be
authentic reversions to a primitive condition.
In addition, the third mandibular premolar normally is lacking in
Euderma. In Plecotus it is present, but is smaller than either P, or Py.
In the subgenus Corynorhinus it is commonly squeezed between the
104 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VoL. 110
larger teeth so that its cross-sectional outline is distorted. Frequently
it is displaced to the lingual side of the tooth row.
DENTAL FORMULAE: Based on the foregoing conclusions, the dental
formulae of the bats discussed in this paper may be written as follows:
Se Myotis
ee S38 Plecotus
ae : = 34 Euderma, Barbastella
aa *: = oe = 32 Histiotus, Laephotis
= - — = =30 Otonycteris, Nyctophilus, Pharotis
oa : ae 3 =28 Antrozous
Supraspecific Nomenclature and Relationships
History OF NOMENCLATURE
SUPRAGENERIC NOMENCLATURE: Several genera of the family
Vespertilionidae have exceptionally large ears: Plecotus (including
Corynorhinus and Idionycteris, now regarded as subgenera), Huderma,
Histiotus, Laephotis, Otonycteris, Nyctophilus, Pharotis, and Antrozous.
The relationships of these genera have been variously interpreted.
Typical of the opinion of his time, Dobson (1875, p. 348) included all
known genera in his ‘Group Plecoti’’ which was the equivalent of a
subfamily. As late as 1897 Miller (1897, p. 41) employed the name
Plecotinae, of subfamily rank, to include the American big-eared
vespertilionids Plecotus (subgenus Corynorhinus) and Euderma. For
Antrozous he erected a separate subfamily, Antrozoinae. Later
Miller (1907, p. 197) abandoned the subfamily Plecotinae and included
its genera in the subfamily Vespertilioninae. At the same time he
adopted the terminology of Peters (1865) and placed Antrozous in the
subfamily Nyctophilinae.
The large ears and auditory bullae and strong zygomata—the
principal characteristics common to the 10 genera and subgenera
listed above—may not indicate kinship. The classification of Tate
(1941, p. 590; 1942, p. 225), based on other characters, probably
better expresses the natural relationships of these genera and sub-
genera:
Subfamily Vespertilioninae
Group Myotini
Genera: Plecotus
Corynorhinus
Idionycteris
Euderma
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 105
Group Pipistrellini
Genera: Histiotus
Laephotis
Group Nycticeini
Genus: Otonycteris
Subfamily Nyctophilinae
Genera: Nyctophilus
Pharotis
Antrozous
Tate (1942, p. 229) supposed the assemblage of big-eared bats of
the group Myotini to be simply a specialized derivative of the Myotis
stock, presenting an odd combination of primitive and specialized
characters, but not being sufficiently differentiated to warrant the
erection of a special category.
GENERIC NOMENCLATURE: Initially confused with the exclusively
South American genus Histiotus (J. Allen, 1891, p. 195), the bat
H. maculatum was soon recognized as the representative of a distinct
genus, Huderma (H. Allen, 1892, p. 467). Subsequently, the validity
of Huderma has not been questioned.
The status of the names Idionycteris, Plecotus, and Corynorhinus
has been less clear. Jdionycteris has remained so little known since
its description by Anthony in 1923 that there has been no speculation
on its systematic position beyond Anthony’s supposition that its
nearest relative is Plecotus auritus. The nomenclatural history of
the Eurasian Plecotus has been one of stability. Subsequent to the
recognition of the genus in 1818 by E. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, the
big-eared vespertilionines of Europe and temperate Asia have been
recognized consistently by the name Plecotus.
No such stability characterizes the nomenclatural history of the
bats to which the name Corynorhinus has been applied. Rafinesque
used Vespertiio for the first named form in 1818. Later authors
(Lesson, 1827; LeConte, 1831; Cooper, 1837) discerned a likeness
between European and American big-eared bats and used the name
Plecotus for both groups. Following this was a brief period of belief
that the American big-eared bats and Eurasian barbastelles were
related, and the name Synotis was used for both (Wagner, 1855;
H. Allen, 1864). H. Allen gave the American big-eared vespertilionines
independent generic status for the first time in 1865 with the name
Corynorhinus. This position was confirmed by Miller (1897, 1907)
and more recently by Tate (1942). In the 75 years following its
conception, the name Corynorhinus has been in almost universal usage
for the American forms exclusive of Euderma. A major exception
was Dobson’s (1878) conclusion that Corynorhinus is a synonym of
Plecotus. Beginning with Simpson (1945), there has been a new
trend away from the independent use of the name Corynorhinus and
106 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VoL. 110
a tendency to synonymize it under the name Plecotus. However,
there seems to have been no study of specimens to support the con-
tention that Corynorhinus and Plecotus are congeneric, or to determine
the relation of Idionycteris to them.
CLASSIFICATION OF Bic-EARED Bats
While agreeing with the basic outline of Tate’s (1942, p. 225)
classification of vespertilionid big-eared bats, I prefer a slightly
modified version:
Subfamily Vespertilioninae
Group Myotini
Genera: Euderma
Plecotus
Subgenera: Jdionycteris
Plecotus
Corynorhinus
Group Pipistrellini
Genera: Histiotus
Laephotis
Group Nycticeini
Genus: Otonycteris
In my opinion, the degree of difference between the nominal genera
Idionycteris, Plecotus, and Corynorhinus is of subgeneric or specific
rather than generic grade. Jdionycteris is a basal or relict form,
whereas Plecotus and Corynorhinus represent more advanced or later
evolutionary stages. Corynorhinus has evidently differentiated more
rapidly than Plecotus, and has approached the point of generic dis-
tinction from its near relatives. Inasmuch as these forms represent
different stages of evolution and since they form a disjunct series, at
least one of the steps of which contains more than one species, it seems
best to regard the degree of difference between the three forms of as
subgeneric rather than specific magnitude. Evidence in support of
this thesis is presented in the following pages.
CHARACTERS AND COMPARISONS
Cranial characters relating Huderma and Plecotus and distinguishing
them from other big-eared bats (Histiotus, Laephotis, Otonycteris,
Nyctophilus, Pharotis, and Antrozous) of the family Vespertilionidae
are:
Rostrum relatively weak, narrow, and shallow.
Brain case elongated and vaulted in the frontal region.
Zygomata parallel (in dorsal view) and not bowed out posteriorly.
. Dentition weak (teeth not robust).
. Cusps of teeth high and sharp-pointed.
. P, not so high as Mj.
. Teeth reduced in number only slightly from the chiropteran maximum,
NOT RWN HE
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 107
The bats of the genera Huderma and Plecotus form a close-knit unit,
morphologically and, apparently, phyletically. Huderma and Plecotus
appear to be more closely related to one another than either is to any
other vespertilionid genus, yet the differences separating them are
clearly of generic grade (table 1).
The nearest relative of Huderma and Plecotus appears to be Barba-
stella (p. 118). Also closely related are Myotis and Pvrpristrellus
and their closest allies. Similarities most striking are the lack of
-BARBASTELLA BARBASTELLUS USNM 142583 SWITZERLAND
4213Q ARIZONA
PLEGOTUS (IDIONYGTERIS) PHYLLOTIS AMNH 62260 TAMAULIPAS
Gaol FX KE
PLEGOTUS (PLEGOTUS) AURITUS MGZ 36987 GERMANY
PLECOTUS (CORYNORHINUS) TOWNSENDIL MGZ 40876 WASHINGTON
Ficure 4.—Skulls of Barbastella, Euderma, and Plecotus (Barbastella about 4 times natural
size, others about 3 times natural size). ‘Traced from photographs,
108 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL, 110
shortening of the rostrum and lack of dental specialization (loss of
teeth and cusps). In these features the resemblance of Huderma and
Plecotus to Myotis is greater, to Pipistrellus less. This relation is
further substantiated in the postcranial skeleton, where Huderma and
Plecotus have some characters of Myotis (species compared: lucifugus,
thysanodes, yumanensis), and some of Pipistrellus (species compared:
javanicus, subflavus), but in most features they are more like Myotis.
On the basis of dental, osteological, and external features, it appears
that Huderma and Plecotus should stand between Myotis and Pipi-
strellus in the classification of Chiroptera.
Genus Euperma: Huderma maculatum is more specialized than any
species of Plecotus. It has carried auditory modification—the most
spectacular character of the two genera—to the greatest extreme,
and in dental characters it is unique. By elongation, in addition to
enlargement, of the auditory bulla it has departed from the usual
vespertilionid pattern. Externally too, Huderma has exceeded Plecotus
and, indeed, all other vespertilionids in auditory specialization—in
extreme enlargement of the auricle, in the simplification of the tragus
by elimination of the posterior basal lobe, and in the attachment of
the tragus to the posterior basal lobe of the auricle as well as to the
anterior basal lobe so that the auricle forms a more perfect funnel
to the auditory meatus.
Hall (1934) pointed out important differences between the body
skeletons of Euderma and Plecotus. Notable are the unusual length
and shape of the presternum and the shape and angle of the acromion
process of the scapula in Huderma.
The anterior portions of the tooth rows show great specialization
in Huderma. In the upper jaw I’ and P! are reduced; in the lower the
canine is reduced (though provided with a prominent accessory cusp),
P; has been eliminated, and P, is single-rooted. The posterior portions
of the tooth rows, on the other hand, are morphologically primitive in
character: There is a trace of a hypocone cusp on M! and on M?, the
metacone of M? is well developed, and P, has a metaconid cusp. With
the exception of the elongated brain case and bifid median postpalatal
prominence, other features of the cranium are primitive as far as the
genera Huderma and Plecotus are concerned: The rostrum is weak, the
supraorbital region is sharply ridged, the temporal ridges do not
coalesce, and the zygomata are strong and are provided medially with
a large postorbital expansion.
The nostrils are unspecialized, retaining the primitive basic vesper-
tilionid shape, as seen in Myotis and Prpistrellus.
The evolutionary significance of the bold black and white color
pattern of the fur is not known. Such a pattern crops up sporadically
in the orders of the class Mammalia, but is notably rare in Chiroptera.
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 109
Among the vespertilionids it is seen only in Huderma maculatum and in
the rare African Glauconycteris superba (Hayman, 1939, 1946), which
resembles Huderma maculatum in being black and white but has a more
elaborate pattern. Hayman even suggested a similarity of the pattern
of Glauconycterts superba to that of the spotted skunk, Spilogale.
Some other species of Glauconycteris have a similar pattern but with
subdued brown and buff tones rather than black and white. Scoto-
manes ornatus of southeastern Asia has a pattern of white spots and
stripes on the pelage, but the ground color is bright reddish rather than
black. In some other forms, Kerivoula picta and Myotis formosus for
example, the flight membranes, rather than the fur, are patterned
with contrasting colors (Wroughton, 1912, p. 1195, pl. a).
Despite numerous evidences of specialization, Huderma retains
many primitive traits. It appears to occupy an evolutionary position
below the more abundant and more progressive, although less special-
ized, Plecotus, with which it shares its geographic range. An early
derivative of the Euderma-Plecotus stock, Euderma maculatum has
traveled a road of independent specialization to the point where it
is possibly overspecialized.
Genus Puecotus: From the study of Recent and fossil material,
I infer that the hypothetical ancestor from which the subgenera
Idionycteris, Plecotus, and Corynorhinus were derived probably had
the following characteristics: Tooth rows not crowded; I' bicuspidate;
I? simple, about two-thirds the height of I'; upper canine strong and
exceeding P* in height; P! robust, considerably exceeding cingulum of
canine in height; P* with full hypocone surface, a large anterior cingu-
lum, and a protocone cusp; M! and M? without trace of a hypocone
cusp; M?* with prominent metacone and a fourth commissure; lower
incisor series strongly imbricated and increasing in size from J, to I;;
lower canine equaling protoconid cusp of M, in height; P, much more
robust than P;; P, double-rooted; lower molars with internal cusps
almost equaling external cusps in height. Rostrum narrow and
arched; anterior nares not enlarged; supraorbital region sharply
ridged; temporal ridges not forming a sagittal crest; zygoma strong
and expanded in middle third; basial pits not developed; median
postpalatal prominence absent. Nostril with full cornu and lacking
posterior elongation; muzzle glands not enlarged; auricle large, with
a simple, complete anterior basal lobe, a small accessory anterior basal
lobe, and transverse ribs not reaching the posterior margin of the
auricle.
From this generalized or primitive pattern, derivations, either in
the form of reduction or simplification or in the form of elaboration,
are to be regarded as traits of specialization or progressiveness. In
110 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
no instance are these bats sufficiently well known to determine the
teleological significance of these traits.
The differences distinguishing the subgenera Idionycteris, Plecotus,
and Corynorhinus mainly concern the external configuration of the
nostril, muzzle, and ears (table 2). Dental, cranial, and skeletal
differences are numerous but slight (table 3). In the following dis-
cussion, Plecotus townsendw is given as a typical example of the
subgenus Corynorhinus. Unless otherwise noted, statements regard-
ing it apply equally to the other Recent species of the subgenus,
P. mexicanus and P. rafinesquii. The subgenera Plecotus and Idio-
nycteris are monotypic, represented respectively by the species P.
auritus and P. phyllotis. Inasmuch as P. phyllotis is known to me
only from three specimens, statements concerning it must be regarded
as highly tentative.
The dental formula is the same in the three subgenera, and, as may
be seen from the following comparisons, the individual teeth must be
closely scrutinized in order to detect differences.
The secondary cusp of I! is absent or variable in P. townsendii,
usually present in P. mexicanus, and always present in P. rafinesquit,
P. phyllotis, and P. auritus. The space between IJ? and the canine is
frequently, but not always, greater, and P! averages larger in P. auri-
tus than in the other species. FP* is consistently wider than long in
P. phyllotis and P. townsendi; longer than wide in P. auritus. Be-
cause the metacone of M?® is somewhat reduced in P. auritus, the
third commissure of M? is equal to or shorter than the second in most
individuals, whereas in P. phyllotis and P. townsendii the third com-
missure is normally equal to or longer than the second. P, is usually
more robust in P. auritus and P. phyllotis than in P. townsendii,
considerably exceeding P; in size. P, is double-rooted in P. auritus;
single-rooted in P. phyllotis and P. townsendii. In P. phyllotis the
internal cusps of the mandibular molars are almost as high as the
external cusps; in the other species of Plecotus the internal cusps are
lower.
An analysis of these observations on dentition reveals four features,
which, because each is consistent in at least one of the subgenera, may
be regarded as having primary taxonomic significance. These fea-
tures are the simplification in I’, M?, and P, respectively, and the
specialization in P*. P. phyllotis exhibits the generalized (unsimpli-
fied and unspecialized) condition in three features, is specialized in
one (P,); whereas P. auritus is specialized in two (P* and M?); and
all of the species of the subgenus Corynorhinus are specialized in one
(P,) and one of the species in another (I'). Three other features—
crowding of the upper incisor series and diminution of the size of P!
and P;—are inconsistent, but may be of some significance. In these
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY
Euderma
Median postpalatal process a bifid
prominence.
Auditory bullae roughly elliptical
in outline.
Brain case relatively long: post-
palatal length averages 40-41%
of greatest length.
Presternum longer than wide.
Upper incisors stand in line with
toothrow.
I! almost as small as I’.
P! minute; not exceeding cingulum
of canine in height.
Hypocone cusp barely indicated in
M! and M?.
Lower canine small; not exceeding
P, in height.
Anterointernal cusp of lower ca-
nine almost equal to primary cusp
in height.
TasBLE 1.—Morphological characters distinguishing Euderma from Plecotus
Plecotus
Median postpalatal process absent
or a simple spine.
Auditory bullae roughly circular in
outline.
Brain case relatively short: post-
palatal length averages 34-38%
of greatest length.
Presternum wider than long (un-
known in Plecotus phyllotis).
Upper incisors stand inside tooth-
row.
I! a third higher and twice as wide
as J?,
P! larger; exceeding cingulum of
canine in height.
Hypocone cusp not indicated in M!
and M?.
Lower canine large; much exceeding
P, in height.
Anterointernal cusp of lower canine
small and greatly exceeded by pri-
mary cusp.
P; absent.
P, with well defined metaconid
cusp.
Tragus lacking basal lobe.
Tragus united with posterior basal
lobe of auricle.
Coloration black and white in bold
pattern.
497256—59——__2
P3 present.
P, lacking metaconid cusp.
Tragus with prominent basal-lobe.
Tragus and posterior basal lobe of
auricle not united.
Coloration drab brownish, essen-
tially without pattern.
111
112 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VoL. 110
TaBLE 2.—Comparison of external characters of the subgenera of Plecotus (Idionyc-
teris most generalized, Corynorhinus most specialized, Plecotus intermediate)
Idionycteris
Nostril unspecialized.
Muzzle glands not en-
larged (?).
Auricle with anterior
basal lobe complete.
Accessory anterior basal
lobe of auricle devel-
oped into a projecting
lappet.
Transverse ribs on auri-
cle fade out before
reaching posterior
border.
Second phalanx of third
digit longer than first
phalanx.
Calear keeled.
Interfemoral membrane
attached to tip of last
caudal vertebra.
Plecotus
Nostril with posterior
elongation; cornu re-
duced.
Muzzle glands slightly
enlarged.
As in Idionycteris.
Accessory anterior bas-
al lobe of auricle
slightly developed.
Transverse ribs on au-
ricle run without in-
terruption to poste-
rior border.
Second phalanx of third
digit equal to or
shorter than first
phalanx.
Calcar not keeled.
Interfemoral mem-
brane attached to
base of last caudal
vertebra.
Corynorhinus
Nostril with posterior
elongation; cornu
absent.
Muzzle glands greatly
enlarged.
Auricle with anterior
basal lobe reduced.
Accessory anterior
basal lobe of auricle
absent.
Transverse ribs on au-
ricle interrupted by
vertical rib near
posterior border.
As in Idionycteris.
As in Plecotus.
As in Idionycteris.
features P. phyllotis is generalized in one (P,) and is dubiously special-
ized in the others; P. auritus is generalized in all; and P. townsendit
is specialized in all.
Likewise, in cranial details specialization is greatest in P. town-
sendii, least in P. phyllotis (fig. 4). In the more primitive species, P.
phyllotis and P. auritus, the supraorbital region is sharply ridged; in
P. townsendu it is smoothly rounded [also in the Lower Pleistocene
P. crassidens; faintly ridged in the Middle Pleistocene P. (Coryno-
rhinus) alleganiensis]. The temporal ridges converge to form a median
sagittal crest in P. auritus and P. townsendii, but remain apart in P.
phyllotis and to a lesser degree in P. alleganiensis.
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY
TABLE 3.—Comparison of crania of the subgenera of Plecotus (Idionycteris most
generalized, Corynorhinus most specialized, Plecotus intermediate)
Idionycteris
Supraorbital region
sharply ridged.
Zygoma relatively thick
and strong; postorbi-
tal expansion in mid-
dle third of arch.
Median postpalatal
process absent.
Basial pits absent.
Brain case relatively
shallow: averages
33% of greatest
length.
Brain case relatively
broad: averages 53%
of greatest length.
Rostrum flattened, with
median concavity.
P4 wider than long.
Metacone of M? not re-
duced; 3rd commis-
sure equal to or long-
er than 2nd.
P, single-rooted.
Plecotus
As in Idionycteris.
As in Idionycteris.
Median postpalatal
process a poorly de-
veloped spine.
As in Idionycteris.
Brain case relatively
shallow: averages
32% of greatest
length.
Brain case relatively
narrow: averages
49% of greatest
length.
Rostrum arched, lack-
ing median concav-
ity.
P4 longer than wide.
Metacone of M? re-
duced; 8rd commis-
sure usually equal to
or shorter than 2nd.
P, double-rooted.
Corynorhinus
Supraorbital region
smoothly rounded
or faintly ridged.
Zygomarelatively thin
and fragile; post-
orbital expansion in
posterior third of
arch.
Median postpalatal
process a prominent
spine.
Basial pits prominent.
Brain case relatively
deep: averages 35-
38% of greatest
length.
Brain case relatively
narrow: averages
48-50% of greatest
length.
As in Idionycteris.
As in Idionycteris.
As in Idionycteris.
As in Idionycteris.
113
Broadening and anterior bulging of the brain case in P. phylilotis
and increase in depth of the brain case in P. townsendii may be re-
garded as specializations. Shortening, broadening, and flattening of
the rostrum together with enlargement of the anterior nares in P.
townsendu are specializations that are somewhat paralleled in P.
114 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
NU
PLECOTUS (GORYNORHINUS) RAFINESQUI!I
USNM 297218 LATERAL
LOBE
VENTRAL
LOBE
POSTERIOR
PLECOTUS (CORYNORHINUS) TOWNSENDII LOBE
CM 18760
ae Sf
PLEGOTUS (PLEGOTUS) AURITUS
USNM 18487
Figure 5.—Comparison of the presternum of three species of Plecotus. Ventral (left) and
lateral (right) aspects. Camera lucida sketches.
phyllotis, although the anterior nares are not enlarged in the latter
species.
The zygomatic arches show progressive reduction and weakening
through the series from relatively heavy and strong in P. phyllotis
and P. auritus to relatively light and weak in P. townsendii. Also,
in the latter species there is a shift of the postorbital expansion of the
zygoma, from its primitive median position to a posterior location.
The median postpalatal process, absent in P. phyllotis, is slightly
developed in P. auritus, and is a prominent spine in P. mexicanus and
in some forms of P. townsendw. The lateral grooves (‘‘basial pits’’)
commencing in the basioccipital and ending abruptly in the basisphe-
noid are prominent in P. townsendvi; they are ill-defined or absent in
the more primitive P. phyllotis and P. auritus. Slight elongation of
the auditory bullae is a specialization peculiar to P. phyllotis. The
AMERICAN BATS—-HANDLEY 115
typical vespertilionid bullar shape, as seen in P. auritus and P. town-
sendii, is roughly circular.
The postcranial skeleton is unknown in P. phyllotis and differences
in this respect between P. auritus and P. townsendii are few. In the
latter species the proximal articular surface of the radius is expanded,
and the presternum has the ventral lobe enlarged and the posterior
lobe laterally expanded (fig. 5). P. auritus has departed from the
usual phalangeal pattern of Plecotus and EHuderma, in which the second
phalanx of the third digit is longer than the first (by a slight elongation
of the first phalanx and a considerable shortening of the second),
rendering not only the proportion different but the combined length
less (fig. 6). The calcaral keel, present in P. phyllotis, is lacking in
the other species of Plecotus.
Hamilton (1949, p. 100) pointed out distinctions between the
bacula of P. rafinesquu and P. auritus (as described and figured by
Matthews, 1937, p. 222). However, intrageneric discrepancies of
similar magnitude seem also to exist among the several species of
Myotis, Prpistrellus, and Lasiurus as described and figured by these
same authors. Krutzsch and Vaughan (1955, p. 99) described the
PLECOTUS (CORYNORHINUS)
USNM 297218
ae
II
4
4
Ce
7
7 Pd
PLEGOTUS (PLEGOTUS) AURITUS al: f
USNM 18487 7
7 7
2 7
oO TTS
Vv Iv
Figure 6.—Pectoral appendages of Plecotus, showing relative proportions of first and
second phalanges of third digit.
RAFINESQUI!
116 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
baculum of P. townsendw as being similar to that of P. rafinesqutt.
Pearson, Koford, and Pearson (1952, p. 281) noted that the subgenera
Plecotus and Corynorhinus “possess in common two pairs of Cowper’s
glands, a feature not found in other vespertilionids. Likewise,
seminal vesicles apparently are lacking in both of these genera [sub-
genera].”
Of all the morphological features distinguishing the species of
Plecotus, those of the muzzle and external ears have been supposed to
be of the greatest taxonomic significance.
Enlarged muzzle glands in P. townsendw protrude as grotesque
lumps two to three millimeters high on either side of the muzzle
(fig. 7). There are similar glandular areas on the muzzle of P. auritus,
but they do not project as in P. townsendii. They may not be con-
spicuous in P. phyllotis; there is no external trace of them on three dry
study skins. Dalquest and Werner (1954, p. 156) have observed that
the facial glands of P. rafinesquii are histologically similar to those of
other vespertilionids, particularly Myotis and Pipistrellus. The
prominent muzzle glands (or ‘‘nose lumps’’) are solid masses of skin
covered sebaceous glandular tissue. There are in addition, in
the facial area, nests of sebaceous glandular cells, sudoriferous glands,
and a sublingual gland of the mucous type. The submaxillary gland
apparently has been forced out of the facial area by the extensive
development of the other glandular tissues.
A peculiar posterior elongation of the nostril in P. auritus gives the
nostril a crescentic shape (fig.8). The cornu surrounding the narial
opening is slightly reduced from the primitive vespertilionid condition,
as seen in Myotis and Pipistrellus, and there is a conspicuous shallow
basin extending posteriad from the posterolateral corner of the
opening and separated from it by a septum. A similar posterior
elongation of the nostril in P. townsendii is partially concealed by the
overlapping muzzle glands. In this species the cornu is reduced to
the point of obliteration, and the narial opening is squarish in outline
and is bordered by smooth pale-colored skin resembling the lining of
the nostril. As in P. auritus, the narial opening proper and the
posterior elongation are separated by a septum. In the available
specimens of P. phyllotis the nostrils appear to approximate the
primitive vespertilionid type, with full cornua and without posterior
elongations.
The snout is truncate in P. auritus and P. townsendvi rather than
acute as in Huderma maculatum and most other vespertilionines (pos-
sibly acute in P. phyllotis).
A lappet projecting over the forehead from the anterior base of the
auricle is the chief characteristic of P. phyllotis. This appendage is
an enlargement of the accessory anterior basal lobe of the auricle (fig.
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY oul WA
9), a lobe that is present, although small and inconspicuous, in P.
auritus but absent in P. townsendw. Modification also occurs in the
primary anterior basal lobe, where variation ranges from reduction in
P. townsendii to no modification in P. phyllotis and enlargement in
P. auritus (fig. 9).
Thus, with regard to the dental, osteological, and external charac-
teristics of these bats, it appears that P. (dionycteris) phyllotis is the
most generalized and primitive member of the group; P. (Coryno-
rhinus) townsend is most specialized and progressive; and P. (Plecotus)
auritus is intermediate (but nearer P. townsendir).
Comparison of Plecotus with other vespertilionine genera confirms
the observation that the differences among its species are, at most,
of no more than subgeneric magnitude. Myotis, Pipistrellus, and
PLEGOTUS (CORYNORHINUS)
TOWNSENDII
USNM 148550
ra
PLEGOTUS (PLEGOTUS) AURITUS
USNM 8660I
MYOTIS VEL
USNM 102472
Ficure 7.—Muzzles of Plecotus, compared in anterolateral aspect with the muzzle of
Myotis, a generalized vespertilionid. Camera lucida sketches.
118 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Eptesicus are not suitable for such a comparison because of the prob-
ability that they are polyphyletic aggregations, and not natural
groups. Most of the other vespertilionine genera are either monotypic,
consist of slightly differentiated species, are of disputed validity, or
are not sufficiently well known. The American genus Lasiurus is a
notable exception, being well known, widely distributed, and contain-
ing several well-differentiated species. Included in the genus are the
red bats (LZ. borealis, etc.), hoary bats (L. cinereus, etc.), and yellow
bats (ZL. ega, etc.). The magnitude of the differences distinguishing
these species equals or exceeds the magnitude of the differences dis-
tinguishing the species Plecotus phyllotis, P. auritus, and P. townsendii
(compare tables 2, 3, and 4).
Stratus oF Genus BarpasteLua: Miller (1907, p. 224) pointed out
the likeness of Barbastella to EHuderma and Plecotus, whereas Tate
(1942, p. 230) tried to show that any relationship between Barbastella
and these genera isremote. Tate believed that Huderma and Plecotus
are derivatives of the Myotis stem, and he supposed that Barbastella
came from the Pipistrellus stem.
The strongest resemblances of Barbastella to Pipistrellus are in
tooth formula, and in the posterior shortening of the palate, which
extends only a short distance past M*. Like Pipistrellus, but also
like Myotis as well, Barbastella has small, relatively simple auditory
bullae; fragile, much-reduced zygomata without postorbital expan-
sions; and a short angular process of the mandible. The few resem-
blances of Barbastella to Pipistrellus and its relatives seem to lose
much of their significance, however, in view of the many similarities
of Barbastella to Euderma and Plecotus:
. Rostrum relatively narrow and weak.
. Brain case elongated and vaulted in frontal region.
. Zygomata (in dorsal aspect) parallel and not bowed out posteriorly.
. Coronoid process of mandible high.
. Dentition weak.
. Cusps of teeth high and sharp.
Lower incisors graduated in size (I; large to I, small).
. I; with prominent extra internal cusp (total of 4 cusps).
. Lower canine with prominent anterointernal basal cusp.
. Pg not so high as M,.
SCHOANOORWN HE
—
The resemblance of the teeth in Barbastella, Euderma, and Plecotus
is particularly striking. In shape and proportions, the teeth of these
genera are almost identical. ‘The facts that one of the upper pre-
molars (P!) has been crowded out of the tooth row and that one of
the lower premolars (P;) has been eliminated in Barbastella are not
sufficient in themselves to indicate that Barbastella is closely related
to Pipistrellus. (Note that Huderma also has the same dental for-
mula as Pipistrellus.)
AMERICAN
BATS—HANDLEY
119
Tasue 4.—Morphological characteristics of bats of the genus Lasiurus
red bats
(L. borealis, ete.)
Size small (forearm
37-44 mm.)
Lateral wings of pre-
sternum equal to
body of presternum
in width.
Presternum about as
long as wide.
Auditory bullae not
enlarged.
Rostrum relatively
short.
Sagittal crest very
weak.
Coronoid process
medium height.
P! usually present.
Hypocone slightly re-
duced on M! & M?.,
M3 very reduced.
P, double-rooted.
M; talonid reduced.
hoary bats
(L. cinereus, etc.)
Size large (forearm
46-57 mm.)
yellow bats
(L. ega, etc.)
Size large (forearm
44-57 mm.)
Lateral wings of pre-
sternum equal to
body of presternum
in width.
Presternum much
longer than wide.
Auditory bullae
slightly enlarged.
Rostrum medium.
Sagittal crest weak.
Coronoid process low.
P! usually present.
Hypocone much re-
duced on M! & M?.
M3 reduced.
P, single-rooted.
M; talonid only
slightly reduced.
Lateral wings of pre-
sternum consider-
ably broader than
body of prester-
num.
Presternum about as
long as wide.
Auditory bullae not
enlarged.
Rostrum relatively
long.
Sagittal crest strong.
Coronoid process
high.
P! always absent.
Hypocone slightly re-
duced on M! & M2.
M3 slightly reduced.
P, double-rooted.
M; talonid much re-
duced.
Barbastella is unique in the degree of posterior extension of the
anterior nares, which reach so far back that the vomer is exposed
as a Median spine.
the subgenus Corynorhinus.
Its muzzle glands are almost as large as those in
A pair of deep grooves extend from the
nostrils to the upper lip. The auricles are peculiarly short and broad
and are connected across the forehead.
In each there is a conspicuous
subapical lobe on the posterior border, and the posterior basal lobe
is attached nearer the angle of the mouth than in Luderma or Plecotus.
120 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VoL. 110
PLEGOTUS (CGORYNORHINUS)
TOWNSEROI
USNM 149550
(RIGHT MUZZLE GLAND
REMOVED TO EXPOSE FULL Is nae,
EXTENT OF POSTERIOR
aia a Sooty
MUZZLE GLAND
PLECOTUS (PLEGOTUS)
AURITUS
POSTERIOR ELONGATION
USNM 16386 SEPTUM
NARIAL OPENING
CORNU
MYOTIS VELIFER
USNM 102472
Ficure 8.—Muzzles of Plecotus, compared in anterodorsal aspect with the muzzle of
Myotis, a generalized vespertilionid. Camera lucida sketches.
The tragus is relatively long, is broad at the base, and tapers abruptly
to a pointed tip.
Barbastella is a relative of Huderma and Plecotus that lacks the ex-
treme auditory specialization characterizing these genera. In this
respect, Barbastella must be more primitive than Huderma and Plecotus.
On the other hand, in most cranial details Barbastella is similar to
Euderma and Plecotus, and in some features such as fragile zygomata,
large anterior nares, posterior nares lying far forward, and short tooth
rows it has surpassed them in degree of specialization.
If the assumption is correct that Barbastella is closely related to
Euderma and Plecotus, then it follows that most of the cranial char-
acters shared by the three genera must have been established before
auditory specialization occurred. Further, the Barbastella stock must
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 1 PA
PLEGOTUS (CORYNORHINUS)
TOWNSENDI
USNM 148550
PLEGOTUS (PLEGOTUS) AURITUS
USNM 86667
TRANSVERSE
RIBS
ANTERIOR BASAL
LOBE
TRAGUS ACCESSORY ANTERIOR
BASAL LOBE
POSTERIOR
BASAL LOBE CONNECTING
MEMBRANE
PLECOTUS (IDIONYCTERIS)
PHYLLOTIS
AMNH 62260
MCZ 5943
Ficure 9.—Variation in the auricle and its appendages in Plecotus. Free-hand sketches.
have been derived very early and had a long subsequent period of in-
dependent development and specialization.
Systematic Treatment
Key to the genera Euderma and Plecotus
Posterior basal lobe of auricle attached to base of tragus; auditory bulla elongated
| (elliptical in outline); I! almost as small as I?; hypocone cusp indicated on M!
and M?; lower canine small, but its anterointernal cusp greatly enlarged; Ps
| absent; P4 with well defined metaconid cusp; coloration black and white in
j bold pattern... . . . . . Euderma (p. 122)
) Posterior basal lobe of Ruricle Renarared for irae by a notch; auditory bulla
not elongated (circular in outline); I’ a third higher and twice as wide as [?;
| hypocone cusp not indicated on M! and M?; lower canine large, but its antene
internal cusp small; P; present; P, lacking metaconid cusp; coloration drab
| brownish, essentially without pattern. ...... . . . Pleeotus (p. 127)
P22 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Genus Kuderma H. Allen
Histiotus J. A. Allen, 1891, p. 195. (Part.)
Euderma H. Allen, 1892, p. 467.
Type species: Histiotus maculatus J. A. Allen.
DistriBuTIon: Southwestern United States and probably north-
western Mexico.
Description: Supraorbital region sharply ridged (fig. 4); temporal
ridges not coalescing posteriorly to form a sagittal crest; brain case
exceptionally elongated; zygoma relatively heavy, with postorbital
expansion in middle third of arch; median postpalatal process a bifid
prominence; auditory bulla roughly elliptical in outline; presternum
longer than wide.
Upper incisors in line with tooth row; I’ simple, without accessory
cusps (fig. 2), except occasionally near cingulum, and small, only
slightly larger than I’; I? close to or touching upper canine; P! minute;
hypocone cusp barely indicated on M! and M?; third commissure
longer than second and metacone relatively well developed in M?;
lower canine reduced in thickness, not exceeding P, in height, and
possessing a prominent anterointernal secondary cusp almost equaling
primary cusp in height; P; about one-half the size of P,, and not
crowded; P; absent; P, single-rooted and possessing a well defined
metaconid cusp.
No large glandular masses on muzzle (fig. 7); nostril opening
small, of primitive vespertilionid type (fig. 8), provided with a cornu,
and not extended posteriorly or opening upward; auricle and tragus
very large (fig. 9); tragus not provided with a basal lobe, but united
with posterior basal lobe of auricle; anterior basal lobe of auricle
complete; transverse ribs on auricle extend to posterior border of
auricle; second phalanx of third digit longer than first phalanx (fig. 6);
calcar not keeled; interfemoral membrane attached to base of last
caudal vertebra; coloration black and white in bold pattern; mem-
branes and ears grayish.
Euderma maculatum J. A. Allen
Histiotus maculatus J. A. Allen, 1891, p. 195.
Euderma maculata H. Allen, 1894, p. 61.
Hototypr: AMNH 3920/2991; young adult skin (skull lost sub-
sequent to original description) ; ‘“‘caught on a fence” in March 1890,
by Thomas Shooter; near Piru, Ventura County, Calif. [probably
mouth of Castac Creek, Santa Clara Valley, 8 miles east of Piru,
Los Angeles County, Calif. (Miller, 1897, p. 49)].
DistRiBuTION: Southwestern United States and probably north-
western Mexico (fig. 10). West to Washoe County, Nev.; Mariposa,
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY W3
Kern, and Los Angeles Counties, Calif. South to Riverside County,
Calif.; Yuma County, Ariz.; (?Magdalena, Sonora?); Dona Ana
County, N. Mex. East to Dona Ana County, N. Mex.; San Juan and
Salt Lake Counties, Utah; Yellowstone County, Mont. North to
Yellowstone County, Mont.; Canyon County, Idaho; Washoe County,
Nev. Zonal range: Lower Austral to Transition. Altitudinal range:
189 feet below sea level in Riverside County, Calif., to 4,045 feet in
Mariposa County, Calif. Only 16 specimens are known to be
preserved in museums.
Description: As indicated above. Adult coloration: Upper parts
blackish with large, roughly circular, white spots on the shoulders
Figure 10.—Distribution of Euderma maculatum J. A. Allen. Solid symbols, specimens
in museums; open symbols, other records; encircled solid symbol, type locality.
124 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VoL. 110
and at the base of the tail, and patches of cottony white hair at
the posterior base of each auricle; all hairs black at base, except
those at posterior bases of auricles. Underparts with hairs white
tipped, the white incompletely concealing the black bases. Membranes
pale grayish brown, auricles and tragi yellowish brown.
MEASUREMENTs: See tables 7, 13.
Remarks: USNM 269842, not reported previously, was captured
9 miles east of Roll, Yuma County, Ariz., on 5 August 1940, and was
submitted to the National Museum by Mrs. W. A. Jones, Box 3, Roll,
Ariz. It is an adult, probably a male, mummified, with the skull
still inside the skin. In Mrs. Jones’ words, the details of its capture
were as follows:
Dear Sirs. Am sending a bat of a kind I haven’t seen before. ... The
bat was captured the fifth of August, here at my home. It was a very hot day,
and the bat kept coming and lighting on the screened porch. My son [Weldon
Allen, Jr.], nine years old, caught it and brought itin the house. We gave it water.
It was very thirsty. It lived about three hours after catching it. ... I wish
you could have seen the bat when it was alive. It was a pretty thing in an odd
way.
Hasirat: Huderma has seldom been collected or observed alive by a
mammalogist, despite the fact that it inhabits one of the most in-
tensively collected areas of the world. At least five of the records for
it can be attributed to small boys, and many of the other records stem
from persons neither scientists nor naturalists. Use of mist nets and
other trapping devices has failed to produce specimens.
Euderma appears to be an inhabitant primarily of open or scrub
country. There is only one record of occurrence in a forest, in
Yosemite Valley, Calif. (Parker, 1952, p. 480); however, Vorhies
(1935, p. 225) quoted Herbert Brown as stating that Arizona Indians
assured him it was a forest dweller. Usually it has been found in or
on houses—in biological laboratory (Miller, 1903, p. 165; Hall, 1935, p.
148) ; in residence (Nicholson, 1950, p. 197); on porch (Hardy, 1941, p.
293; Mrs. W. A. Jones, 1940, in litt.; Benson, 1954, p. 117); under
eaves of house (Durrant, 1935, p. 226; Ashcraft, 1932, p. 162); clinging
to side of brush house (Vorhies, 1935, p. 225); in driveway near house
(Tucker, 1957, p. 406). Less frequently it has been observed in caves
or cave-like structures—in moist cave (Hardy, 1941, p. 293); in
springhouse dug into hillside (Parker, 1952, p. 481); in mine tunnel
(Vorhies, 1935, p. 225); in root cellar (Hall, 1946, p. 158). One that
was being attacked by yellow jackets when found perhaps had tried
to creep into a crevice or tree hole where these insects nested (Parker,
1952, p. 480). Several specimens have been in or near water—
floating in puddle, the overflow from a railway water tank (J. Grinnell,
1910, p. 317); floating in shallow reservoir (Benson, 1954, p. 117);
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 125
damp and bedraggled, one foot from river’s edge (Parker, 1952, p.
480); hanging from rock projection in closed springhouse (Parker,
1952, p. 481); hibernating above large pool of water in cave (Hardy,
1941, p. 293). One was found hanging [impaled?] on a fence (J. A.
Allen, 1891, p. 195) and one with injured wing was found clinging to
the lower side of a rock at the base of a cliff (Hall, 1939, p. 103).
Five of the specimens were dead, two were obviously injured, and
all but one of the remainder died within a few hours after capture.
Several that were obtained alive showed great thirst for water, and at
least 10 of the live individuals were exposed to daylight where found.
Of the 22 recorded occurrences, 13 were about houses. Six of the 13
were clinging to the outside of the structures.
The normal habitat of this species is unknown. The foregoing facts
suggest departures from its normal habitat in response to stimuli of
rather frequent occurrence. A narrow tolerance in habitat selection
by the spotted bat could explain the lack of natural collections and
the frequency of abnormal ones. Suppose that the bat’s habitat were
very restricted and were such that it might frequently change to the
bat’s disadvantage. Suppose for instance that Huderma maculatum
requires absolute privacy from other bats and requires moist places
for roosting in its normally arid surroundings. This might restrict it
largely to moist crevices, which because of their limited extent might
occasionally dry up and force the bat out, to alight, thirsty and dying
from desiccation, on porches, sides of houses, in driveways, etc.
The spotted bat fits very well Amadon’s description (1953, p. 464),
of relict species:
Relicts are species that tend to become more and more restricted both geo-
graphically and ecologically, because they are unable to compete successfully with
other species. . . . On continents, relicts often survive by becoming more and
more specialized, through a process of natural selection, to a narrow ecological
niche where they do manage to retain a competitive advantage.
Bruavior: Most recorded individuals appear to have been solitary
wanderers. Although Huderma maculatum has been observed at all
seasons, seven of the 17 occurrences for which the date is recorded are
for the months of August, September, and October, the period of post-
breeding season wandering characteristic of many bats. Only at
Yosemite Valley, Calif., where two specimens were collected 20 years
apart, has more than one specimen been secured, although Hardy
(1941, p. 293) was told that four had been found hibernating in a
Utah cave. C. Hart Merriam was told by ranchers in the Vegas
Valley, Nev., that “a very large bat ‘with ears like a jackass and a
white stripe on each shoulder’ is abundant in that place in the summer”
(Miller, 1897, p. 49).
Two reports suggest possible association of Huderma with other
126 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
species of bats. Vorhies (1935, p. 225) quoted Mexican informants as
saying “‘there were many bats in the drifts [side shafts of a mine] and
among them was the one spotted one.”” Hardy (1941, p. 293) observed
Myotis subulatus and Plecotus townsendii in a Utah cave in which
Euderma had been reported.
Apparently Huderma rests suspended by the feet with head down
(Parker, 1952, p. 480); an informant of Hardy (1941, p. 293) reported
hibernating individuals suspended by the thumbs, with head up.
Parker (1952, p. 480) recorded that a captive specimen walked with
wrists and feet, and could thus travel over horizontal surfaces with
considerable facility. Durrant (1935, p. 226) was told that a captive
moved about its cage in pursuit of flies held with forceps.
When the bat is alert the normal carriage of the ear is erect, directed
slightly forward, with tip bent slightly back. When disturbed, the
bat folds ears, but not the tragus, down against the side of the neck,
much in the fashion of Plecotus townsendit (Parker, 1952, p. 480).
Some individuals were docile, with little inclination to resist handling
(Parker, 1952, p. 481), but one was said to have “had plenty of fight’’
when molested (Hall, 1939, p. 103). One was being attacked by one
or more ‘yellow jackets,” and had sustained injury to the humeral
areas of both wings when it was found. It was attempting to fend off
the insects with its feet (Parker, 1952, p. 480).
The voice of this bat has been described as a “soft, extremely high-
pitched, metallic squeak”’ (Parker, 1952, p. 481); a hissing noise and
rat-like squeak (Hall, 1939, p. 103); and a typical bat chirp (Durrant,
1935, p. 226). Also, it clicks its teeth together (Hall, 1939, p. 103)
and makes ‘‘a queer grinding noise by gnashing its teeth” (Ashcraft,
1932, p. 162).
The report of an individual that flew through an open door or win-
dow into a house at about 11 p.m. (Nicholson, 1950, p. 197) indicates
that Huderma, like Plecotus auritus, may be nocturnal rather than
crepuscular.
Foop: Although several captive individuals eagerly accepted water
to drink, few showed interest in various types of food. One ate cottage
cheese (Parker, 1952, p. 481). Another, force-fed at first, later readily
took flies offered with forceps. It accepted five flies at each of two
daily feeding periods. When flies were offered it wrinkled up its nose,
chirped, and advanced as rapidly as possible to seize the fly. It also
eagerly pursued empty forceps. This individual lived for three weeks
in captivity. Its death was accidental (Durrant, 1935, p. 226). Food
habits under natural conditions are not known.
Data on migration, hibernation, reproduction, and molt are lacking
for this species.
Loca NAMEs: ‘“‘Spotted”’ bat is the name in most general usage,
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 127
although Hardy (1941, p. 293) referred to the use of the name “‘pinto”’
bat in Utah, and Vorhies (1935, p. 225) reported that Mexicans knew
it as ‘‘pinto” bat in Sonora. Nevadan ranchers likened its ears to
those of a jackass (Miller, 1897, p. 49) and Grinnell (1910, p. 318)
likened its dorsal color pattern to a “‘death’s-head.”’ Two boys who
discovered one on the side of a brush house mistook it, at first glance,
for a young rabbit (Vorhies, 1935, p. 225), while a boy who saw one
crawling on the ground first thought it was a tarantula spider (Parker,
1952, p. 480). People who saw one with its ears folded back thought
it was “some sort of horned beast’”’ (Parker, 1952, p. 480).
SPECIMENS EXAMINED: Five, from the following U.S. localities:
New Mexico: Dona Ana County: Mesilla Park, la (USNM). Arizona:
Yuma County: 9 miles east of Roll, ls (USNM); 4 miles south of Yuma, Is
(MCZ). Cautrornia: Los Angeles County: Mouth of Castac Creek, 8 miles east
of Piru, ls (AMNH). Uran: Salt Lake County: Salt Lake City, Is (UU).
ADDITIONAL RECORDS (asterisk indicates specimen preserved in a
museum) :
MEXICO: Sonora: Near Magdalena (Vorhies, 1935, p. 225).
UNITED STATES: Arizona: Maricopa County: Tempe* (Stager, 1957, p.
260). Catirornia: Kern County: Red Rock Canyon*, 30-40 miles north of
Mohave (Hall, 1939, p. 103). Mariposa County: Yosemite National Park’,
Yosemite Valley, 4,045 feet, 2 specimens (Ashcraft, 1932, p. 162; Parker, 1952, p.
480). Riverside County: Mecca*, 189 feet below sea level (J. Grinneil, 1910,
p. 317). San Bernardino County: China Lake*, 4 miles south of Inyo County line
(Stager, 1957, p. 260); Granite Wells, near Pilot Knob, Barstow area (Parker,
1952, p. 481); Twentynine Palms* (Benson, 1954, p. 117). NEevapa: Clark
County: Vegas Ranch, Vegas Valley (Miller, 1897, p. 49). Esmeralda County:
Fish Lake Valley (Hall, 1946, p. 158). Washoe County: Reno* (Hall, 1935, p.
148). Uraun: Garfield County: Hatch (Hardy, 1941, p. 293). Kane County:
Crocodile Cave, 4 miles north of Kanab (Hardy, 1941, p. 293). San Juan County:
5 miles northwest of Monticello* (Benson, 1954, p.117). Ipano: Canyon County:
15 miles southwest of Caldwell* (Tucker, 1957, p. 406). Montana: Yellowstone
County: Billings* (Nicholson, 1950, p. 197).
Genus Plecotus EK. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire
The synonymy is given under the subgenera.
Types specizs: Vespertilio auritus Linnaeus.
Distripution: Temperate parts of North America, Eurasia, and
northern Africa (Palaearctic and Nearctic regions) (fig. 11).
Description: Supraorbital region sharply ridged or smoothly
rounded (fig. 4); temporal ridges remain apart or coalesce to form
sagittal crest; brain case relatively short; zygoma relatively heavy or
light, with postorbital expansion in middle or posterior third of arch;
median postpalatal process absent or a spine-like prominence; auditory
bulla roughly circular in outline; presternum wider than long.
497256—59 3
128 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
E 7 ,
Ficure 11.—Distribution of Plecotus, showing coincidence with the North Temperate Zone
(here defined as a region having an average annual temperature between 35° and
70° F.).
Upper incisors not in line with remainder of tooth row (lingual);
I’ simple or bifid (fig. 2), much larger than I’; I? not touching canine;
P! small; hypocone absent and protocone reduced posteriorly in M?
and M?; size of third commissure and metacone variable in M?’; lower
canine much exceeding P, in height, and possessing a well defined, al-
though small, anterointernal basal cusp; P; and P; small and crowded
or not; P, single-rooted or double-rooted and lacking a well defined
metaconid cusp.
Muzzle provided with dorsolateral glandular masses which in some
forms rise above the muzzle as peculiar lumps (fig. 7); nostril openings
small and of primitive vespertilionid type or large, opening upward,
and peculiarly extended posteriorly (fig. 8); auricle and tragus large
(fig. 9); tragus provided with a prominent basal lobe, and not united
with posterior basal lobe of auricle; anterior basal lobe of auricle
normal, expanded, or reduced; transverse ribs on auricle variable in
posterior extension; second phalanx of third digit longer or shorter
than third phalanx (fig. 6); calear keeled or not; interfemoral mem-
brane attached to base or tip of last caudal vertebra; coloration brown,
without pattern, except for ventral pallor; membranes and ears
brownish.
Key to subgenera of Plecotus
1. Nostril unspecialized; accessory basal lobe of auricle developed into a projecting
lappet; calcar keeled; brain case broad (53 percent of greatest length).
Subgenus Idionycteris (p. 129)
Nostril with posterior elongation and reduction of cornu; accessory basal lobe
of auricle absent or only slightly developed; calcar not keeled; brain case
narrow (averaging 48-50 percent of greatest length). ...... Jai a4
|
|
|
|
|
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 129
2. Supraorbital region sharply ridged; postorbital expansion of zygoma in middle
third of arch; basial pits absent; P4 longer than wide; 3d commissure of M®
equal to or shorter than 2d; Ps double-rooted; muzzle glands'slightly enlarged;
anterior basal lobe of auricle complete; 2d phalanx of 3d digit shorter than
isiphalank 34.0. . . . . . Subgenus Plecotus (p. 132)
Supraorbital region emoothiy Pounded or faintly ridged; post orbital ex-
pansion of zygoma in posterior third of arch; basial pits prominent; P4
wider than long; 3d commissure of M? equal to or longer than 2d; P single-
rooted; muzzle glands greatly enlarged; anterior basal lobe of auricle re-
duced; 2d phalanx of 3d digit longer than Ist phalanx.
Subgenus Corynorhinus (p. 136)
Subgenus Idionycteris Anthony
Plecotus J. A. Allen, 1881, p. 184. (Part.)
Corynorhinus G. M. Allen, 1916, p. 352. (Part.)
Idionycteris Anthony, 1923, p. 1.
Typr sprcius: Jdionycteris mexicanus Anthony.
Distrispution: Northeastern Mexico and southwestern United
States (fig. 12).
Description: Supraorbital region sharply ridged (fig. 4); temporal
ridges do not coalesce to form a sagittal crest; rostrum broad for a
Plecotus, flattened, and with pronounced middorsal concavity; brain
case relatively broad and shallow; zygoma relatively thick and strong
in appearance, with postorbital expansion in middle third of arch;
median postpalatal process absent; basial pits absent; auditory bulla
slightly elongated in outline.
I! with accessory cusp (fig. 2), near base of tooth; P! small, barely
exceeding cingulum of canine in height; P* wider than long; space
between posterointernal edge of P* and anterior edge of M!' only
about one-third the lingual length of P*; third commissure of M?
equal to or longer than second commissure (fourth commissure may be
barely indicated); metacone of M®? fairly prominent; P; much larger
than P3; P, single-rooted.
Glandular masses on muzzle not noticeably enlarged (fig. 7); nostril
of primitive vespertilionid type, with well-defined cornu (fig. 8);
auricle with anterior basal lobe complete, but not prolonged beyond
anterior edge of auricle (fig. 9); accessory anterior basal lobe enlarged
and produced beyond edge of auricle as a “lappet’”’; transverse ribs
on auricle may or may not extend to posterior edge of auricle;! tragus
relatively broad and short; second phalanx of third digit longer than
first phalanx (fig. 6); forearm averages relatively short; calcar keeled;
interfemoral membrane with 12 to 13 transverse ribs and attached
to tip of last caudal vertebra.
1In the type of mezicanus the ribs fade out indeterminently near the posterior border, leaving this area of
membrane clear; in the type of phyllotis the ribs apparently end about 3 mm. from the posterior border, at
which point they break into a multiplicity of wrinkles which extend to the border; in USNM 302900, from
Arizona, the ribs definitely extend to the posterior border of the auricle.
130 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Plecotus phyllotis G. M. Allen
Plecotus auritus J. A. Allen, 1881, p. 184.
Corynorhinus phyllotis G. M. Alien, 1916, p. 352.
Idionycteris mexicanus Anthony, 1923,? p. 1.
Plecotus phyllotis Dalquest, 1953, p. 63.
Tdionycteris phyllotis Handley, 1956, p. 53.
Hototyre: MCZ 5943; adult female, skin and skull; collected
24 March 1878 by Edward Palmer; San Luis Potosi, [probably near
the city of San Luis Potosi or near Rio Verde (J. A. Allen, 1881,
p- 193)], Mexico.
DistripuTion: Known only from San Luis Potosi, Tamaulipas,
and Arizona (fig. 12). Further collecting may show this species to
have a geographic range similar to that of Plecotus (Corynorhinus)
mexicanus (fig. 15).
Description: As in subgeneric description. Adult coloration:
Mass effect of upperparts between Warm Buff and Cinnamon-Buff;
hair bases Bone Brown, sharply distinguished from hair tips; a
conspicuous cottony tuft of whitish hairs surrounds the posterior
base of each auricle. Tips of hair of underparts between Pale
Ochraceous-Buff and Light Buff, sharply distinguished from the
Bone Brown to Fuscous-Black hair bases. Face covered with short
hairs; anterior external border of auricle with many long, curly
hairs; hairs long, lax, and dense on remainder of body. Size large
for genus; tragus appearing shorter than in other species of Plecotus
and almost as broad as in Plecotus auritus.
MBASUREMENTS: See tables 7, 13.
Remarks: Until Cockrum’s capture of a specimen in southeastern
Arizona in 1955 (Cockrum, 1956b, p. 546), this species had been
known only by two Mexican specimens which had served individually
as types for Corynorhinus phyllotis G. M. Allen and IJdionycteris
mexicanus Anthony. ‘These names have been shown to be synony-
mous (Handley, 1956, p. 53). The two Mexican specimens are
almost identical. Compared with them, the example from Arizona
is larger, its tragus is more broadly rounded (more blunt) distally,
and the bat is more pallid throughout. Dorsally its fur is more
buffy, less yellowish brown, and its ears and membranes are more
grayish, less brownish. These differences may represent geographic
variation, but it hardly seems worthwhile to apply a new subspecific
name until additional specimens, now available, are studied.
Hasirat: Very little is known of the natural history of this species.
The Arizona specimen was taken at 1:00 a.m. on 30 May 1955 in a
mist net stretched across an artificial swimming pool on the lawn of
2 Holotype: AMNH 62260; adult female, skin and skull; collected 17 June 1922 by W. W. Brown; Miqui-
hauna [= Miquihuana?], Tamaulipas; collector’s No. 2. This locality is on the eastern flank of the Sierra
Madre Oriental, at about 5,000 feet elevation, near the upper edge of the Lower Austral Zone (Goldman,
1951, p. 263).
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 131
Figure 12.—Distribution of Plecotus phyllotis G. M. Allen. Solid symbols, specimens
examined; encircled solid symbol, type locality.
the Southwestern Research Station of the American Museum of
Natural History (Cockrum, 1956b, p. 546). This is a riparian com-
munity in a region where the oak-juniper association dominates.
Subsequently, additional specimens of P. phyllotis have been
netted in the same area, but data on them have not been published.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED: Three, from the following localities:
MEXICO: San Luis Porosf: 1s (MCZ). Tamavurpas: Miquihauna
[= Miquihuana?], ls (AMNB).
UNITED STATES: Arizona: Cochise County: Southwestern Research
Station, 5 miles west-southw est of Portal, 5,400 feet, ls (USNM).
132 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VoL. 110
Subgenus Plecotus E. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire
Vespertilio Linnaeus, 1758, p. 32. (Part.)
Macrotus Leach, 1816, p. 5. (Nomen nudum.)
Plecotus E. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 1818, pp. 112, 118.
Plecautus F. Cuvier, 1829, p. 415.
Tyre Spseciss: Vespertilio auritus Linnaeus.
DistrirpuTion: Temperate parts of Eurasia and northern Africa.
Norway, Great Britain, Ireland, Portugal, and Canary Islands east
to Kamchatka, and Japan; north to Kola Peninsula, lat. 60-62°N.
in Siberia, Sakhalin, and Kamchatka; south to Canary Islands,
French Morocco, Tunisia, Sudan, Israel, northern Iran, northern
Pakistan, Nepal, Sinkiang, Szechwan, Hopeh, Korea, and Japan
(fig. 13). Altitudinal range, sea level to 10,500 feet.
Description: Supraorbital region Sigel ridged (fig. 4); tem-
poral ridges coalesce to form a sagittal crest; rostrum narrow com-
ae with other subgenera of Plecotus, arched, and without mid-
dorsal concavity; brain case relatively narrow and shallow; zygoma
relatively thick and strong in appearance, with postorbital expansion
in middle third of arch; median postpalatal process a poorly devel-
oped spine; basial pits absent; auditory bulla circular in outline.
I! with accessory cusp (fig. 2); P! relatively large, considerably
exceeding cingulum of canine in height; P* longer than wide; space
between posterointernal edge of P* and anterior edge of M? almost
equals lingual length of P*; third commissure of M® equal to or shorter
than second commissure; metacone of M? not prominent (reduced to
Ril ty sell
Ficure 13.—Distribution of Plecotus auritus Linnaeus. Solid symbols, type localities.
1, P. a. auritus Linnaeus; 2, P. a. teneriffae Barrett-Hamilton; 3, P. a. meridionalis
Martino; 4, P. a. christiet Gray; 5, P. a. mordax Thomas; 6, P. a. wardi Thomas; 7, P. a.
puck Barrett-Hamilton; 8, P. a. homochrous Hodgson; 9, P. a. kozlovi Bobrinskii; 10,
P. a. ariel Thomas; 11, P. a. sacrimontis G. M. Allen.
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 133
vanishing point in some specimens) ; P; much larger than P;; P, double-
rooted, almost as long in anteroposterior diameter at the cingulum as
the tooth is high.
Glandular masses on muzzle slightly enlarged (fig. 7); nostril with
slightly reduced cornu and with posterior elongation (fig. 8); auricle
with anterior basal lobe complete and projected noticeably beyond
anterior edge of auricle (fig. 9); accessory anterior basal lobe small
and not projected beyond edge of auricle; transverse ribs on auricle
extend without interruption to posterior border of auricle; tragus
relatively broad and long; second phalanx of third digit equal to or
shorter than first phalanx (fig. 6); forearm averages relatively short;
calcar not keeled; interfemoral membrane attached to base of last
caudal vertebra.
MEASUREMENTS: See tables 7, 13.
Remarks: According to Ellerman and Morrison-Scott (1951, p.
181), the subgenus includes only one species, P. auritus. They list 11
geographic races (fig. 13).
Literature on the natural history of Plecotus auritus is extensive.
The following data were gleaned from English sources, mostly from
Alcock and Moffat (1901), Barrett-Hamilton (1910-1911), Matthews
(1952), and Millais (1904). For reference to the excellent studies in
Germany, see Hisentraut (1937).
Hasirat: Plecotus auritus is distinctly arboreal, characteristically
hunting in the foliage of large trees. Ash trees seem to be particularly
favored, but oaks and other deciduous species also may be frequented.
However, it is not unusual to see P. auritus hawking around the upper
shoots of hedgerows and willows, and sometimes it descends to forage
among the lower shrubs and flowers in gardens. Rarely it hunts low
over meadows, and has been observed to alight on cow dung to devour
the insects attracted there.
P. auritus commonly hangs up by day in the summertime in old
boathouses, cowsheds, church attics, and similar places; behind
window shutters and under eaves of old houses; in tree holes; and even
on trunks of trees, sheltered only by the roughness of the bark. This
species may utilize separate sites as daytime sleeping places and
night-time dining-halls or lounges. Barns and outbuildings are
favored for the latter, but tree-trunks are also used. Accumulations
of insect remains in such places betray the nightly visits of the bats.
Winter roosts are principally in caves, where crevices as well as open
chambers may be utilized. Attics of old houses and occasionally
hollow trees are also used.
Brnavior: In some parts of its range, as in Britain, P. auritus may
be one of the commonest and most widely distributed bats, yet its
habits render it less conspicuous,than many of the others. It is
134 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
nocturnal and not crepuscular, beginning to forage 30 to 40 minutes
after sunset. Then it moves in such a delicate, mothlike fashion in
and out of foliage that it is not easily detected. It has been suggested
that to see this species the observer should station himself at dusk
under a tree whose foliage is not too dense to be seen through (e.g., an
ash) and watch closely for the bats to appear among the branches
overhead. Close attention is necessary, for the movements of the
long-ear may be so stealthy that the presence of even five or six
individuals hunting simultaneously in a single tree may be overlooked.
Furthermore, the observer should choose fine weather for his vigil
inasmuch as P. auritus seems to be much affected by atmospheric
conditions.
Undoubtedly this species catches some flying insects, but much of
its prey is picked from foliage. It hovers somewhat like a humming-
bird to pick insects from leaves or flowers, or it plunges into the middle
of a spray and remains for several seconds clinging to the twigs. It
has been observed climbing among branches, on tree trunks, and on
walls, presumably in search of food.
Flight from tree to tree or roost takes a special form. When the
destination is near at hand the bat darts through the air with a swift,
direct flight. When the destination is more distant, the bat makes a
plunging descent to within a few inches of the ground and makes off
in a jerking zig-zag fashion. So sudden and irregular are its move-
ments that its course is difficult to follow.
In direct flight the ears appear to be held erect, but when the bat
threads its way among foliage in search of insects they are thrown
forward so as to resemble a “proboscis” or are curled downward and
forward so as to suggest “‘cheek pouches.’ In sleep the ears are
bent backwards until they le close along the body, partially covered
by the wings, or they are curled down and forward almost like the
horns of a ram. In the former position the tragus always points
forward, in the latter it may be reflexed. The ears may be folded or
unfurled slowly, or snapped up suddenly. The action of the two ears
can be synchronized or independent.
P. quritus alights in an upright position, clinging first to an object
with its thumbs. It soon reverses its position and hangs head down-
ward. In climbing or walking, the limbs are moved alternately, the
head bobs to and fro, and the bat advances in a curious jerky fashion
but with surprising speed. Preparing to fly, the bat raises its head,
pricks forward its ears, and looks about with a seemingly intelligent
air. When forced to do so, P. auritus swims rather well.
The long-ear has a variety of call notes. The commonest are a
high-pitched chirping squeak used in ordinary communication and in
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 135
quarrels, and a shrill, long-drawn, querulous, childlike note uttered
when the bat is disturbed or surprised. There are also buzzing
sounds, and a short, melodious, trilling, birdlike sound used for
communication, both in flight and at rest.
Moffat (1922, p. 107) observed mating both before and after
hibernation. The single young is born in June or July. Females
commonly form nursery colonies of up to 50 or 100 or more indi-
viduals during spring and summer. Large winter aggregations are
infrequent. Solitary hibernating individuals are often found. The
long-ear is ordinarily rather quarrelsome in disposition, attacking
and biting bats of other species that venture too near its roosting
spot. It has been observed to attack and drive away the pipistrelle
from its feeding area. Occasionally mixed colonies of P. auritus and
Pipistrellus pipistrellus and various species of Myotis have been
encountered.
Ryberg (1947, p. 71) tested the homing ability of the long-ear.
Two of nine banded individuals returned 32 miles from the point of
release to their home territory.
P. auritus is easily maintained in captivity. It tames quickly,
eats readily, and remains in good health for some time. It is clean
in its habits, grooming itself carefully after feeding. It seems more
intelligent than other bats and is playful, alert, and lively, even in
daytime.
Flower (1931, p. 161) recorded the survival of a P. auritus in
captivity for 1 year, 2 months, and 2 days. The maximum recorded
ages of banded, wild individuals are 5 years, 4 months (Ryberg,
1947, p. 78) and 5 years, 6 months (Verschuren, 1956, p. 5).
Parasirss: Stiles and Nolan (1931, p. 713) listed 27 genera of
parasites known to have infested P. auritus.
Foop: The long-eared bat is primarily a moth-eater. Gould
(1955, p. 400) reported Lepidoptera of 22 species in its diet. These
varied in wing spread from 30 to 67 millimeters (average 45). Re-
mains of several species of Coleoptera and Diptera have been found
in its droppings. In captivity it seems to prefer mealworms, but
will also accept flies and raw meat.
HisperNATION: In the British Isles the hibernating season for
P. auritus extends from about the middle of October to early April.
This species is a light sleeper, and if disturbed will generally wake,
chatter, and attempt to bite if touched. It sometimes emerges in
winter from its hibernating quarters when the weather is mild, and
it commonly shifts during the winter from spot to spot within its
place of hibernation without venturing out into the open.
136 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Subgenus Corynorhinus H. Allen
Vespertilio Rafinesque, 1818, p. 446. (Part.)
Plecotus Lesson, 1827, p. 96. (Part.)
Synotus Wagner, 1855, p. 720. (Part.)
Corynorhinus H. Allen, 1865, p. 173.
Corynorhynchus Peters, 1865, p. 524. (Nomen nudum.)
Corinorhinus Dobson, 1875, p. 348.
Tyrer species: Plecotus macrotis LeConte.
DisrRinuTIoN: Temperate North America in Lower Austral and
Lower Sonoran to Canadian life zones from Virginia, Ohio, Illinois,
Kansas, South Dakota, Idaho, and British Columbia south to the
Gulf of California and the Gulf of Mexico and through the Mexican
Highlands to the Isthmus of Tehuantepec (fig. 27).
Description: Supraorbital region smoothly rounded or faintly
ridged (fig. 4); temporal ridges remain apart or coalesce to form a
sagittal crest; rostrum broad compared with other subgenera of
Plecotus, flattened, and with slight middorsal concavity; brain case
relatively narrow and deep; zygoma relatively thin and fragile in
appearance, with postorbital expansion in posterior third of arch;
median postpalatal process a prominent spine; basial pits prominent;
auditory bulla circular in outline.
I! with or without accessory cusp (fig. 2); P! small, barely exceeding
cingulum of canine in height; P* wider than long; space between
posterointernal edge of P* and anterior edge of M! only about one-
third lingual length of P*; third commissure of M? equal to or longer
than second commissure; metacone of M? fairly prominent; P, only
slightly larger than P3; Py single-rooted, much shorter in antero-
posterior diameter at the cingulum than the tooth is high.
Glandular masses resembling thumbless mittens, rise from sides of
muzzle (fig. 7); nostril without cornu and with posterior elongation
(fig. 8); auricle with anterior basal lobe reduced to a small lap of
membrane near tragus (fig. 9); accessory anterior basal lobe absent;
transverse ribs on auricle interrupted by vertical rib near posterior
border of auricle; tragus relatively narrow and long; second phalanx
of third digit longer than first phalanx (fig. 6); forearm averages
relatively long; calcar not keeled; interfemoral membrane attached
to tip of last caudal vertebra.
Key to species of the subgenus Corynorhinus
1. M3 with 4th commissure almost as long as 8rd (Pleistocene species).
P. tetralophodon (p. 140)
M3 with 4th commissure barely indicated or absent. . .......-. 2
2. Supraorbital region faintly ridged, those ridges continuous with the temporal
ridges, which do not coalesce to form a sagittal crest (Pleistocene species).
P. alleganiensis (p. 137)
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 137
Supraorbital region not ridged; extension of temporal ridges into the inter-
orbital region variable; temporal ridges normally coalesce to form a sagittal
crest (Recent species) . a Ua) wae Renee A 3
3. Tips of ventral hairs ne or whitish, Sreeoly contrasted with blackish beeea
median postpalatal process triangular in shape, with a broad base; rostrum
weak and much depressed; I! with prominent secondary cusp; anterointernal
cusp of cingulum of P4 usually present (Southeastern United States).
P. rafinesquii (p. 151)
Tips of ventral hairs brownish or buff, often not sharply contrasted with
slate, gray, or brownish bases; median postpalatal process usually styliform,
with a narrow base (occasionally triangular); rostrum strong and not
depressed (east of Great Plains and in Pacific Northwest), or variable; I!
with or without secondary cusp; anterointernal cusp of cingulum of P4
absent (east of Great Plains), or variable ........ Ye Oke 4
4. Coloration of dorsum dark sooty-brown, with scant contrast ipetwean bases
and tips of hairs; greatest length of skull usually less than 15.7 mm. (9)
or 15.5 mm. (co); maxillary tooth row usually less than 4.9 mm.; I! usually
with secondary cusp; tragus usually less than 13 mm. long; interfemoral
cross-ribs usually less than 9 (Mexico). . . . . P. mexicanus (p. 141)
Coloration of dorsum (in Mexico) yellow-brown, with sharp contrast between
bases and tips of hairs; greatest length of skull usually more than 15.7 mm.
(9), or 15.5 mm. (co); maxillary tooth row usually more than 4.9 mm.; I!
usually simple; tragus usually more than 13 mm. long; interfemoral cross-
ribs usually more than 9 (Appalachians, Ozarks, western United States,
southwestern Canada, Mexico)... .. . . . P. townsendii (p. 165)
PLEISTOCENE SPECIES
Plecotus alleganiensis Gidley and Gazin
Corynorhinus alleganiensis Gidley and Gazin, 1933, p. 345.
Hoxtotypr: USNM (Vert. Paleont.) 12412; skull with incomplete
dentition and lacking auditory bullae, zygomatic arches, and man-
dibles; collected 1912-1915, by J. W. Gidley; Cumberland Cave,
Allegany County, Md.
DistriBuTIon: Known only from the Pleistocene fauna of Cumber-
land Cave, Md. (fig. 14).
Description: Skull similar in size and proportions to those of the
Recent species P. rafinesquii and P. townsendii, but brain case possibly
shallower and wider; supraorbital region slightly ridged; temporal
ridges strongly marked, continuous with supraorbital ridges, and
converging posteriorly, but not coalescing to form a sagittal crest;
dorsal profile of rostrum almost straight; upper dentition (P'—M®
known) appears to be identical to that of Recent material; lower
dentition (Ii—M; known) similar to that of Recent species, but
teeth average slightly more robust.
MeaAsuREMENTS: Holotype, in millimeters: Greatest length, 15.9+ ;
interorbital breadth, 3.9; brain case breadth, 8.5; brain case depth,
5.5; maxillary tooth row, 4.9+; postpalatal length, 5.9+; palatal
breadth, 5.9.
138 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Ficure 14.—Type localities of the Pleistocene species: 1, Plecotus alleganiensis Gidley and
Gazin; 2, Plecotus tetralophodon Handley.
Comparisons: When Gidley and Gazin described Plecotus al-
leganiensis from the Pleistocene deposits of Cumberland Cave, Md.,
they had little comparative material of Recent species from nearby
areas. I have compared the type and other cranial fragments of
Plecotus alleganiensis with the now abundant material of P. townsendi
from West Virginia and of P. rafinesquii from the southeastern
United States. While some of the characters ascribed to P. al-
leganiensis by Gidley and Gazin are not as distinctive as they supposed,
still there are sufficient differences to warrant separation of P. al-
leganiensis from P. townsendii and P. rafinesquii.
The faint supraorbital ridges and the prominent, independent,
temporal ridges distinguish P. alleganiensis from the Recent species.
In both specimens of P. alleganiensis that have the middorsal portion
of the skull intact, the supraorbital and temporal ridges are continu-
ous, and the temporal ridges converge posteriorly to within about
0.75 mm. of each other, but do not merge to form a sagittal crest.
In Recent species of the subgenus Corynorhinus the temporal ridges
sometimes extend into the interorbital region, but there is no supra-
orbital ridge. A sagittal crest usually is present in Recent species
(exceptions noted are a specimen of P. mexicanus (KU 29911) from
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 139
Mexico and specimens of P. townsendii (AMNH 142023, USNM
297710) from West Virginia; in these the temporal ridges are contigu-
ous but not coalesced).
The presence of supraorbital ridges is interpreted as a primitive
characteristic. They are present in Huderma maculatum, Plecotus
auritus, and P. phyllotis. They are absent in P. mezxicanus, P.
rafinesquii, and P. townsendii. Separate temporal ridges, also con-
sidered to be a primitive characteristic, are observed in Huderma macu-
latum and in Plecotus phyllotis; they unite to a common crest in the
other Recent species of the genus Plecotus.
Other cranial characters relate P. alleganiensis closely to the Recent
species P. rafinesquit and P. townsendiv. The rostrum is relatively
broad and flattened; the anterior nares are enlarged; the rostral
profile is almost straight (normally, though not invariably, concave
in P. townsendii virginianus, and normally almost straight in P.
rafinesquii). The palate and basicranium are similar to those of
Recent species of the subgenus Corynorhinus; basial pits are prominent.
General proportions of the skull of P. alleganiensis are the same as
in P. t. virginianus; the brain case may be a trifle shallower. Depth
of the brain case is difficult to assess in the only specimen in which
it is intact, however, for the posterior part of the skull has been
compressed (the occipital condyles are in the plane of the basioccipital-
basisphenoid plate, the foramen magnum is in almost the same plane,
and the supraoccipital, rather than being almost vertical to the main
axis of the skull, has its lower margin tilted forward about 30°).
The upper dentitions of Recent P. ¢. virginianus and fossil P.
alleganiensis are indistinguishable. None of the 27 mandibular frag-
ments of P. alleganiensis is complete, but all parts of the lower jaw
are represented. Differences between the mandibles of P. alleganien-
sis, P. townsendii, and P. rafinesquii are slight. The masseteric
(coronoid) fossa is usually deeper and better defined in the fossil,
and the mandibular foramen lies more posteriorly and lower, nearer
the base of the angular process; the canine averages larger in diameter
at the cingulum; P,; averages slightly larger; and the molars average
slightly broader—in essence, the dentition of P. alleganiensis is slightly
more robust.
P. alleganiensis differs markedly from the other Pleistocene species,
P. tetralophodon, in having the skull apparently broader, the supra-
orbital region ridged, the temporal ridges farther apart, and the fourth
commissure of M® barely indicated.
Rewationsuips: P. alleganiensis shares many morphological fea-
tures with the two Recent species of the genus that now inhabit the
eastern United States. It could have been directly ancestral to either
or both of these species. Relationship of P. alleganiensis to the
140 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VoL. 110
Mexican Pleistocene®species, P. tetralophodon, appears to be more
remote.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED: Four cranial fragments and 27 fragments of
mandibles from Cumberland Cave, Md.
Plecotus tetralophodon Handley
Corynorhinus tetralophodon Handley, 1955b, p. 48.
Hotorype: CIT (Vert. Paleont.) 192/2989; well preserved skull
with worn teeth (lacking mandibles, auditory bullae, hamular proc-
esses, all incisors, right canine, and the minute premolar, P', from
each maxilla); collected by Chester Stock in Pleistocene deposits of
San Josecito Cave, near the town of Aramberri, southern Nuevo
Leén, Mexico, elevation 7,400 feet.
DistRipuTION: Known only from the Pleistocene fauna of San
Josecito Cave, Nuevo Leén, Mexico (fig. 14).
Description: Similar to Recent species of the subgenus Coryno-
rhinus in most cranial details. Anterior nares relatively small and
rounded in outline (dorsal view) ; brain case relatively shallow; supra-
orbital ridges lacking; temporal ridges prominent and converging
posteriorly, so that they meet but do not completely merge; inter-
maxillary notch relatively small; extension of palate posterior to M?
relatively short; median postpalatal process styliform; basial pits
deep and well defined. Tooth rows crowded; teeth relatively fragile
(not robust); canine with small internal cingular cusp; anterointernal
cingular cusp of P* only slightly indicated; M*® with well developed
fourth commissure, almost equaling third commissure in length.
MEASUREMENTS: Holotype, in millimeters: Greatest length, 15.6;
zygomatic breadth, 8.2; interorbital breadth, 3.4; brain case breadth,
7.7; brain case depth, 5.3; maxillary tooth row, 5.0; postpalatal
length, 5.9; palatal breadth, 5.7.
Comparisons: A well developed fourth commissure of M? distin-
guishes P. tetralophodon from related species. This commissure is
barely indicated in other New World species of Plecotus and in
Euderma maculatum; there is no trace of it in the Old World Plecotus
auritus, in which even the third commissure of M? is reduced.
The degree of shallowness in the cranium of P. tetralophodon (brain
case depth equals 34 percent of greatest length) is rarely equaled in
Recent specimens of the subgenus Corynorhinus. It is observed in
less degree in Huderma maculatum, Plecotus auritus, P. phyllotis, and
possibly in P. alleganiensis.
Absence of a sagittal crest is a character shared with Huderma
maculatum, Plecotus alleganiensis, and P. phyllotis. The temporal
ridges usually are even farther apart in those forms, however. A few
specimens of P. mexicanus and P. townsendii resemble P. tetralophodon
in this respect.
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 141
Rerationsuirs: Plecotus mexicanus and P. townsendri now inhabit
the region where the fossil P. tetralophodon was found. P. tetralopho-
don must have been closely related to these species, for the general
conformity of the skull is similar in all three; probably all came from
a common stock. I do not believe that P. tetralophodon is directly
ancestral to either of these Recent species, however. It is less like
P. rafinesquii and P. alleganiensis.
SPECIMEN EXAMINED: The holotype.
RECENT SPECIES
Plecotus mexicanus G. M. Allen
Corynorhinus macrotis pallescens Miller, 1897, p. 52. (Part.)
Corynorhinus megalotis mexicanus G. M. Allen, 1916, p. 347.
Corynorhinus rafinesquii mexicanus Miller, 1924, p. 83. (Part.)
Plecotus rafinesquii mexicanus Dalquest, 1953, p. 64. (Part.)
Corynorhinus mexicanus Handley, 1955c, p. 148.
Ho.totypr: USNM (Biol. Surv. Coll.) 98285; adult female, skin
and skull; collected 25 August 1899, by E. W. Nelson and E. A. Gold-
man; near Pacheco [Sierra de Brefia, 8,000 feet], Chihuahua, Mexico;
collector’s No. 13955.
Distrisution: The higher and more humid parts of the Sierra
Madre Occidental, the transverse volcanic belt of central Mexico,
and the Sierra Madre Oriental (fig. 15). North to El Tigre Moun-
tains, Sonora; near Pacheco, Chihuahua; and 22 miles south-southeast
of Monterrey, Nuevo Leén. South to Pétzcuaro, Michoacén; Monte
Rio Frfo, 28 miles east-southeast of Ciudad México; and Jico, Vera-
cruz. Zonal Distribution: Mostly Transition and Upper Austral.
Altitudinal range from 4,800 feet to 10,500 feet; usually above 6,000
feet.
Description: Adult coloration: Tips of hairs of upperparts vary
from Verona Brown to Fuscous, bases from Bone Brown to Fuscous-
Black; degree of differentiation between tips and bases of hairs slight;
burnishing of hair tips absent or only slightly evident in most speci-
mens; hairs at posterior base of auricle paler than remainder of dor-
sum. Bases of hairs of underparts vary from Benzo Brown to Fuscous,
tips are about Pale Pinkish Cinnamon. Immature coloration: Dor-
sum smoky brown, similar to coloration of some adults.
Size small for subgenus; lobes of presternum slightly expanded;
forearm averages relatively long; brain case averages relatively wide
and deep, sloping up abruptly above the short, depressed rostrum;
anterior nares, viewed from above, usually relatively small and angu-
lar in posterior outline; median postpalatal process varies from styli-
form to triangular; auditory bulla averages relatively small. First
uppers incisor usually with’ a® prominent accessory cusp and always
142
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM
VOL. 110
{ i]
1 i
‘ 1
i 1
AS | s
Se 1 I
Bae 1 pag eA Taian be a a ee ~
_ ' SN
seine Px: Wes. Eee || lah! Ne
7°) ES} ‘
g ar S
=a \
o— ie:
— \
~~
\
Ss
erate) \ wore
=a ~ 5 NS
= “Sal ~
= si \
+ yh Ae
———— / \
\ :
Xe
oe
Figure 15.—Distribution of Plecotus mexicanus G. M. Allen.
Solid symbols, specimens
examined; open symbols, other records; encircled solid symbol, type locality.
with at least a trace of such a cusp; upper canine somewhat reduced in
size; P* usually with a small anterointernal cingular cusp. Tragus
(possibly also auricle) averages relatively short; cross-ribs on inter-
femoral membrane average eight.
MEASUREMENTS: See tables 8, 14.
Comparisons: Compared with Plecotus townsendii australis and
P. t. pallescens, P. mexicanus is darker, with less contrast between
bases and tips of dorsal hairs; usually fewer cross-ribs on the inter-
femoral membrane; smaller tragus on the average; smaller skull;
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 143
deeper brain case; shorter, weaker, and more depressed rostrum;
smaller auditory bullae; actually and relatively shorter maxillary
tooth row; and more consistently bilobed first upper incisor. There
is at least an indication of an accessory cusp on I’ in all specimens of
P. mexicanus that I have examined; few specimens of P. t. australis or
P. t. pallescens have even a trace of it.
Retationsures: There is a strong resemblance between P. mezxi-
canus and P. rafinesquii. Similarities include short, weak, depressed
rostrum; deep brain case; bilobate first upper incisor; and possession
of a small anterointernal cingular cusp on P*.
P. mexicanus differs from P. townsendit in somewhat the same man-
ner as does P. rafinesquit. This parallel may not be purely coinci-
dental. Perhaps both P. merxicanus and P. rafinesquii were isolated
from a common stock (of which P. townsendii is the Recent descendant)
at about the same time. However, P. mericanus is not differentiated
from P. townsendii quite as well as is P. rafinesquit. This may indi-
cate more complete or longer isolation for P. rafinesquii, or partially
parallel evolution between P. mezxicanus and P. townsendii.
In coloration P. mexicanus resembles typical P. t. townsendii of the
Pacific Northwest. Apparently this parallel can be traced to similar
environmental stimulae. P. ¢. townsendii inhabits cool, humid,
coastal lowlands, and P. mexicanus inhabits cool, relatively drier
highlands.
Remarks: Since 1890 it has been known that bats of the subgenus
Corynorhinus inhabit Mexico. The first specimen was referred by
J. A. Allen (1890) to Plecotus townsendii, then thought to be mono-
typic. Miller (1897) referred all Mexican specimens to a new race,
P. macrotis pallescens, restricting the name townsendii to populations
in the Pacific Northwest. Later, G. M. Allen (1916) referred all
Mexican material to a new race, P. megalotis mexicanus, restricting
pallescens to the relatively arid portions of the western United States.
Subsequent authors, with the exception of Burt (1938) for bats of
northern Sonora, have applied the name P. rafinesquit mexicanus to all
Mexican populations of the subgenus Corynorhinus. Present evi-
dence, however, indicates that there are in Mexico two species to
which the names P. townsendii and P. mezicanus apply.
Evidence that these are distinct species has been overlooked,
although examples of each have been in museum collections for more
than 60 years. Reasons for this oversight are several:
1. Populations of P. townsendii just north of the range of P. mexicanus in
Arizona converge toward P. mexicanus in size and in coloration, giving an illusion
of geographic intergradation between the two species.
2. The two species are not strikingly different, although they are more distinct
than some species in other genera of bats, such as of Myotis.
497256—59_4
144 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
INTERFEMORAL CROSS—RIBS
(NUMBER OF)
P. MEXICANUS
SPECIMENS !N SAMPLE: TI
LESS THAN 9 RIBS IN 7T6%
FREQUENCY
PLT, AUSTRALIS
SPECIMENS IN SAMPLE: 26
MORE THAN 9 RIBS IN 88%
MAXILLARY TOOTH ROW
(LENGTH OF)
P, MEXICANUS
SPECIMENS IN SAMPLE: 70
LESS THAN 4.9MM. IN B6%
>
o
Zz
w
>
So
w
i
ve
P.T. AUSTRALIS
SPECIMENS IN SAMPLE: 23
MORE THAN 4.9MM. IN 91%
ZYGOMATIC BREADTH
P. MEXIGANUS
SPECIMENS IN SAMPLE: 65
LESS THAN 8.5MM. IN 95%
FREQUENCY
P. T. AUSTRALIS
SPECIMENS IN SAMPLE: 20
MORE THAN 8.5MM. IN 70%
GREATEST LENGTH OF SKULL
P. MEXICANUS
SPECIMENS IN SAMPLE: 68
LESS THAN 15.7 MM. IN 94%
FREQUENCY
P.T. AUSTRALIS
SPECIMENS IN SAMPLE: 21
MORE THAN 15.7MM. IN 95%
Ficure 16.—Comparison of frequency of occurrence of certain measurements in adult
female P. mexicanus (solid symbols) and P. #. australis (open symbols), including all
measurable individuals studied.
497256 O - 59 (Face p, 144)
MONTANA S|) OKLAHOMA VIRGINIA
KANSAS WEST VIRGINIA
NORTHERN)
a
WASHINGTON CENTRAL |END,
OREGON ARIZONA KAS ARKANSAS
|
25
lz0
16.5
16.0
155
15.0
MALE
tet OD LY See MACE
8 — NUMBER OF SPECIMENS ee
IN SAMPLE
OBSERVED RANGE
OBSERVED MEAN
2 STANDARD ERRORS O
EITHER SIDE OF MEA!
2 STANDARD DEVIATION
ON EITHER SIDE OF ME
LEGEND
FIGURE 17.—Gllecotus mexicanus
ic.
TANA i
MON’ pote is Nas pre Lia uenco HIDALGO DURANGO OKLAHOMA VIRGINIA
RORTHERN ANU COAHUILA KANSAS — WEST VIRGINIA
ne ZACATECAS OAXACA NUEVO LEON
WASHINGTON CENTRAL PACHEGO.
, SAN LUIS BIG BEND,
OREGON ARIZONA CHIHUAHUA JALISCO CHARCAS VERACRUZ Potosi phy ; ARKANSAS
N+to
O
‘
’
15.5
15.0
—---- FEMALE
8 — NUMBER OF SPECIMENS 14.5
IN SAMPLE
OBSERVED RANGE
OBSERVED MEAN
2 STANDARD ERRORS ON
EITHER SIDE OF MEAN
2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS
ON EITHER SIDE OF MEAN
LEGEND
497256 © = 59 (Face p, 144)
Ficure 17.—Greatest length (in mm.) of skulls of specimens of Plecotus townsendii (upper set of figures) and Plecotus mexicanus
(lower set of figures), arranged in geographic sequence from northwest to south, thence to northeast.
i i, whostoa ATHAS 44) Ria Ra Aves AMARSHTL
a (on SATALLAV BLED elm COMME
CAZSACS DADSTAIAS: VO CE ay
Sit |, GOHNOSE Big be
ADBAHOWE RACRGDS | JAL > RUM AUHEHO Se anoning
—
- ; :
aWOITAIVaG
“—- ctl sue aaHTIS ~~
?«.
'
a sAzcossaqe loetlede Geofeerarins) idagnad) ie tr 0A
4 | spon aidqargorghmickogoana:{ertugit-todsensiol)
A | | ! ae)
i ae aay 1
i “a 7 ; H yA s
— is \ } 7 iD :
he, A
AD A '
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 145
3. No other two species of the subgenus were known to be sympatric.
4, Relatively few specimens have been available for study. Until recently,
both species were represented only in the U.S. National Museum. The Texas
Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit has had an example of each species since 1942;
the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, has had both since 1946 (skins
and skulls of P. townsendii; P. mexicanus in alcohol); and the Museum of Natural
History, University of Kansas, has had both since 1948.
5. With the exception of the type series of P. mexicanus (preserved as dry skins
and skulls), all early collections of Mexican big-eared bats in the National Museum
were preserved in alcohol, and in a random selection of specimens for removal
of skulls, only P. mexicanus happened to be chosen. The presence of P. town-
sendit, thus, was not detected.
When Mexican material was assembled from several museums for
this study, variation was found to be slight in some series, great in
others. The entire sample segregated into two groups (figs. 16, 17),
each of which included both sexes and various ages. The amount of
variation far exceeded that observed in samples from other parts of
the range of the subgenus Corynorhinus (fig. 17). With one exception,
all specimens could be referred without hesitation to one group or
the other on the basis of a dozen diagnostic characters. Each speci-
men had most of the characters of its group, i.e., any specimen with
dark coloration also had small tragi and few cross-ribs on the inter-
femoral membrane, etc. (fig. 16).
The two forms have distinct although broadly overlapping geo-
graphic ranges (fig. 18). The range of P. mexicanus—the cooler,
moister, higher elevations of the Sierra Madre Occidental, the
transverse volcanic belt of central Mexico, and the Sierra Madre
Oriental (Goldman and Moore, 1946)—is strikingly similar to the
ranges of the dark colored races of the harvest mouse, Reithrodon-
tomys megalotis, outlined by Hooper (1952, p. 51) and to that of the
white-footed mouse, Peromyscus difficilis (Osgood, 1909, p. 179).
The range of the other form, P. townsendiz, is in part complementary.
It inhabits the lower elevations of the arid plateau and desert ranges
of north-central Mexico north of the transverse volcanic belt, and
the arid valleys of Jalisco, Morelos, and Oaxaca south of the trans-
verse volcanic belt. In addition, it occurs together with P. mexicanus
in the southern extremity of the Sierra Madre Occidental (Sierra de
Valparaiso, 8,200 feet) and in the transverse volcanic belt. (Santa
Rosa, 9,500 feet, Convento de Acolman, and Lago Texcoco, 7,500
feet. However, it should be noted that the latter localities are rela-
tively arid, despite their high elevation (Davis, 1944, p. 371; Gold-
man, 1951, p. 146).
This pattern of distribution might exist without intergradation
between the two forms if they were: (1) Subspecies with seasonal
migrations; (2) ecologically isolated subspecies; or (3) distinct,
partially sympatric, species.
146 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
0},
ae
—————
CI %,
tee es
e
fo
“J
=
pbssiogresess:
“Len
Ficure 18.—Sympatry of Plecotus mexicanus (triangular symbols) and Plecotus townsendit
(circular symbols) in Mexico.
Seasonal movement is not apparent in available samples (table 5).
P. mexicanus is found in northern and southern parts of its range in
both winter and summer. P. townsendii has been taken at high eleva-
tions in the transverse volcanic belt (in the range of P. meaicanus)
in both summer and winter, has been found south of the belt in spring,
late summer, and fall, and north of the belt at all seasons.
The theory of conspecificity becomes less tenable when seasonal
movement of one or the other of the subspecies cannot be demon-
strated. The phenomenon of overlapping ends of a chain of sub-
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 147
Tas.E 5.—Seasonal distribution of P. mexicanus and P. townsendii in Mexico, as
determined from specimens for which collection date is known
P. mexicanus
North of transverse volcanic belt In transverse volcanic belt
February: Mojarachic January: Las Vigas
February: Monterrey June: “Morelos”
August: El Tigre Mts. July: Jico
August: Pacheco July: Monte Rfo Frio
December: Sierra de Valparaiso July: PAtzcuaro
November: Santa Rosa
November: Zacualpilla
P. townsendiz
North of transverse volcanic belt In or south of transverse volcanic belt
January: Yoitepec April: San Andrés
February: San Juan July: Convento de Acolman
April: Gen. Cepeda August: Oaxaca
April: Sta. Helena September: Guadalajara
June: San Buenaventura September: Cuernavaca
July: Zimapan November: Charcas
September: Bella Unién November: Santa Rosa
October: Presa de Guadalupe
November: Bledos
November: Muralla
December: Sierra de Valparaiso
species, reacting to one another as species rather than as related
subspecies, however, occurs with some frequency in mammals, al-
though it is more conspicuous in birds. It might apply in this instance
if it could be proved that both P. mexicanus and the Mexican popula-
tions of P. townsendii (P. t. australis) intergrade to the northward
with other populations of P. townsendii (P. t. pallescens). Then it
could be assumed that the extremely arid environment of eastern
Chihuahua and western Coahuila, where big-eared bats are not known
to occur, has served as a barrier, sufficiently isolating related popula-
tions to the east and west of it so that they reacted to each other as
species when both segments invaded areas to the south of the deserts.
Mexican populations of P. townsendii intergrade northward with
other populations of P. townsendii. The zone of intergradation is
broad, extending from northern Coahuila, through the Texas Pan-
148 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VoL. 110
handle. There is no evidence in existing samples of intergradation
between mezicanus and townsendii.
The geographic ranges of the two forms overlap in northern Sonora;
a sample from El Tigre Mountains contains typical individuals of
both forms, and Burt (1938, p. 26) may have had both species in
material from Sfric. It is true that populations of P. townsendii
become smaller in body size and darker in color toward the Mexican
border, but there is no accompanying increase in the frequency of
the accessory cusp of I’, reduction in the number of interfemoral
cross-ribs, reduction in contrast between bases and tips of dorsal
hairs, disproportionate decrease in the size of the auditory bullae,
the auricles and tragi, or the average length of the maxillary tooth
row, increase in the average depth of the brain case, or depression of
the rostrum. In other words, populations of P. townsendii, neighbor-
ing P. mexicanus on the north, show a convergence of some morpholog-
ical characters toward P. mexicanus, perhaps in response to similar
environmental stimulae. Lack of convergence in other characters,
however, indicates a different genetic structure in the two forms.
Dice (1940) used a concept of ecological subspecies to explain the
discontinuous distribution of dark-colored subspecies on isolated
mountain peaks surrounded by lowlands inhabitied by pale-colored
subspecies. Dice supposed that the several isolated dark-colored
populations might have originated in situ as independent derivations
from the pale-colored stock, presumably in response to similar environ-
mental conditions. According to this hypothesis, some subspecies
may be ecological units, rather than units of similar heredity.
Were it not for the mixed samples (Sierra de Valparaiso and Santa
Rosa) and absence of intergradation between the two forms, the
concept of ecological subspecies could be an adequate explanation for
the distribution of the Mexican bats of the subgenus Corynorhinus.
It could be assumed that the alternative forms developed wherever
certain ecological conditions prevailed. Under this hypothesis, inde-
pendent development of the ‘‘mexicanus’’-type might be expected
wherever relatively cool, moist conditions of environment occur, and
the ‘“australis’”-type would be expected under conditions of greater
warmth and aridity. The distribution of both forms then would be
largely independent of geography and would be related primarily to
ecology. The mixed samples could be accounted for as chance min-
gling of the two forms during the nonbreeding season as a consequence
of the interfingering of humid and arid environments. Existing
samples appear to be too numerous and too well distributed, however,
to have failed to show evidence of intergradation, if such exists.
It thus appears that the hypothesis of conspecificity is In no wise
applicable to the Mexican populations of the subgenus Corynorhinus.
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 149
Provided that the data from available samples have not been misinter-
preted, the two forms in consequence must be considered distinct but
partially sympatric species.
A few specimens—such as KU 44759 from near Hacienda La Mari-
posa, Coahuila, which has the coloration, size, large auricle, and shal-
low brain case of P. townsendiz, but the short tooth row, short tragus,
and few interfemoral cross-ribs of P. mexicanus—may be hybrids. In
view of the probable close relationship between the two species, it is
surprising that such specimens appear to be so infrequent.
Geographic variation in cranial characters in P. mericanus seems
insignificant; even individual variation in these characters is of small
magnitude. Geographic and individual variation in color is slight.
The average mass effect of the dorsum in the fine series from Las Vigas
is smoky, blackish brown, with the hair tips so dark as to be hardly
distinguishable from the dark hair bases. The dark extreme appears
almost black to the casual glance, while the pale extreme is brownish,
with sooty tones less pronounced, and with the hair tips slightly paler
than the hair bases. Specimens from the northwestern extremity of
the range of the species are somewhat paler than those from the south-
east; dark extremes are similar in the two regions.
The fur is usually rather short and woolly, but specimens from
10,500 feet in Estado de México (TCWC 2823), 8,200 feet in Zaca-
tecas (USNM 91931), and west-central Chihuahua (USNM 265660)
have long, laxfur. This does not appear to be a seasonal phenomenon,
for short-haired individuals have been taken in January, February,
August, November, and December. The long-haired specimens were
taken in February, July, and December. These differences in pelage
are not obviously related to age or sex.
Hasirat: Apparently this species is partial to forested mountainous
regions, where it roosts in caves, mine tunnels, and_ buildings.
Warmer, less humid, and more desert-like districts in the same general
area are inhabited by P. townsendii. P. mexicanus has been reported
in the following habitats:
Summer: Flying about rain pool in opening in pine-fir forest on Monte Rio
Frio (Davis, 1944, p. 380); in ranch house on lower border of oak forest (5,500
feet) above Jico (E. W. Nelson, field notes); hanging from roof of small, damp,
north-facing grotto in vicinity of mixed forest of pine, oak, and madrojio near
Pdtzcuaro (E. W. Nelson, field notes; Goldman, 1951, p. 195).
Winter: In old mine near Santa Rosa, near summit of Sierra de Guanajuato,
upper slopes of which are characterized by light rainfall and second-growth forest
of oak, alder, madrofio, Crataegus, and wild cherry (E. A. Goldman, field notes;
Goldman, 1951, p. 146). Hibernating at 8,200 feet in Sierra de Valparafso in
cold, damp cavern through which strong currents of air passed from one entrance
to another; upper slopes of sierra forested with pine, juniper, cypress, oak, mad-
rofio, and manzanita, frequently interrupted by wet, grassy meadows (E. A. Gold-
150 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM von. 110
man, field notes; Goldman, 1951, p. 290). In shallow cave in region of oak and
pine near Mojarachic (Knobloch, 1942, p. 297).
Benavior: Information on behavior is scant. E. W. Nelson (field
notes) remarked of a Patzcuaro specimen that:
When first taken in hand its long ears were bent spirally back and downward
close against the sides of the head exactly like a pair of little recurved horns.
While examining the animal with surprised curiosity these horns suddenly ex-
tended and became a pair of huge upright ears. While examining these ears at
first I noted a fine regular waviness to the inner margin of the coiled ear which
disappeared when the ear was extended.
The field notes of HE. A. Goldman tell of a group of big-eared bats
found in the Sierra de Valparaiso in December, 1897:
IT found eight specimens of this species hibernating in a cave at 8,200 feet
altitude. Six of them in formalin were unfortunately lost along with my tank
by my hunter while descending to the town of Valparaiso. They were hanging
as usual by their feet, from the roof of the cave and at considerable distances
from each other—6 to 10 or 12 feet. Their eyes were closed and their bodies cold
and stiff. Their wings were hanging very close to the sides of their bodies. Their
long ears had the margins rolled inwards and they were curled over backward and
downward somewhat like the horns of a sheep and were pressed close to the sides
of the head. When first taken from the cave the only signs of life that I noticed
in them was a very slight moving of the feet, and they would hook them to my
finger. I tied them all up together in a [handkerchief?] and carried them to
camp. Their blood soon began to circulate, their bodies became warm and they
revived sufficiently to be able to chatter and bite at each other and my fingers.
Six hours after they were taken from the cave they could craw] about but although
uninjured none of them were able to fly or at least made no effort to do so. The
cave was cold and damp and a strong current of air passed in at one entrance and
out at another.
Foop: Not known.
Mieration: Like other species of Plecotus, P. mexicanus is not
known to make extensive migrations (see table 5 and p. 146).
Hisernation: According to Goldman’s 1897 field notes (above),
this species may become very lethargic under certain conditions.
Repropuction: Dalquest noted on specimen labels that no embryos
were found among a large group of females collected at Las Vigas in
January. Adult males (10) and adult females (53) were together in
this colony. Adults of both sexes (3 males, 10 females) likewise were
found together at Santa Rosa in November. A group of nine females,
accompanied by five immatures, almost fully grown, but with finger
joints not completely ossified, were collected near Pacheco on 25
August. Solitary immature individuals of slightly younger age were
found on 14 July at Jico and at P&tzcuaro.
Mott: Two of nine adult females collected near Pacheco on 25
August were beginning to molt on chest and shoulders (new hairs still
short and prostrate). Two of five immatures collected with this
group were beginning to molt on the belly.
AMERICAN BATS—-HANDLEY 151
SPECIMENS EXAMINED: A total of 104 from the following localities
in Mexico:
Cuinvanua: Near Pacheco [Sierra de Brefia, 8,000 feet], 14s (USNM); Moja-
rachic [= Mafuarachic?], Rayon District, ls (USNM). Guanasuato: Santa Rosa
[9,500 feet], 18a (USNM). Mé£xico: Monte Rio Frio, 10,500 feet, 28 miles east-
southeast of Ciudad México, ls (TCWC). MicnHoacikn: 2 miles north of Patz-
cuaro, 7,100 feet, 1a (USNM). Moretos: No exact locality, la (USNM).
NurEvo LE6n: 22 miles south-southeast of Monterrey, 4as (MCZ). Sonora:
Santa Marfa Mine, El Tigre Mts., la (UMMZ). VeEracruz: Jico [5,500 feet],
la (USNM); 2.5 miles east of Las Vigas, 8,500 feet, 59bs (KU), 4s (GF); 6 miles
west-southwest of Zacualpilla, 6,500 feet, 3s (KU). Zacatrcas: Sierra de Val-
parafso [13 miles west of Valparaiso, 8,200 feet], ls (USNM).
ADDITIONAL RECORDS: The following records from Mexico probably
refer to this form:
PurBLa: Hacienda de Miguel Sesma, 2 miles northwest of Esperanza (Schwartz,
1954, in litt.). Sonora: Sdric (Burt, 1938, p. 26).
Plecotus rafinesquii Lesson
Synonymy is given under the subspecies.
DistRIBUTION: Southeastern United States (fig. 19).
Description: Adult coloration: Hairs of upperparts blackish at
base and yellowish brown to reddish brown distally, the two areas
sharply demarked; hairs at posterior bases of ears usually not different
from those of remainder of dorsum. Mass effect darkens with wear.
Hairs of chest and belly black or blackish at base, white or whitish at
tip, the division between the two colors sharp; hairs of chin and throat
like remainder of underparts or with buffy wash encroaching from sides
of neck; hairs bordering membranes whitish throughout. Immature
like adult, except much darker throughout, the Avellaneous tips of
the dorsal hairs and the whitish tips of the ventral hairs failing to
conceal the blackish hair bases.
Size medium for the subgenus; presternum with all lobes, but espe-
cially the ventral lobe (almost as wide at tip as lateral lobe), somewhat
expanded. Rostrum weak and much depressed, rendering facial profile
relatively straight; anterior nares relatively small, and posterior border
with somewhat angular shape; intermaxillary notch of palate relatively
narrow posteriorly; median postpalatal process triangular in shape,
with broad base; brain case averages relatively deep for subgenus.
I’ with prominent secondary cusp; P* normally has small anterointernal
cingular cusp.
Comparisons: Plecotus rafinesquii may be distinguished from geo-
graphically contiguous races of Plecotus townsendii by numerous char-
acters. When all populations of P. townsendii are considered, however,
the separation is not so striking. Apparently, only coloration will
distinguish all the individuals of the two species, all populations
considered. P. rafinesquii always has the bases of the ventral hairs
152 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Ficure 19.—Distribution of Plecotus rafinesquii Lesson: 1, P. r. macrotis; 2, P. r. rafines-
quit. Solid symbols, specimens examined; open symbols, other records; encircled solid
symbols, type localities. Cross-hatching indicates known areas of intergradation between
subspecies.
black or blackish and the tips white or whitish, with the two colors
sharply contrasted, whereas P. townsendii, on the other hand, always
has the bases of the ventral hairs slate, gray, or brownish and the tips
brown or buff, with the two colors often not sharply contrasted.
A secondary cusp on the inner upper incisor is present in all speci-
mens of P. rafinesquii. It is absent (or represented only by a slight
shoulder) in all specimens of the geographically adjacent P. t. virgini-
anus. It is absent in most but not all examples of the geographically
more remote P. t. australis, P. t. pallescens, and P. t. townsendii. It is
usually present in geographically adjoining P. t. ingens. The secondary
cusp is present in all specimens of P. mezicanus.
In P. rafinesquii there is usually, though not always, a small antero-
internal cingular cusp on P*. This cusp was not observed in specimens
of P. t. ingens or P. t. virginianus, but is usually present in P. t. town-
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 153
sendii and P. mexicanus and sometimes occurs in P. ¢. australis and
P. t. pallescens.
The median postpalatal process is triangular in shape, with a broad
base, in P. rafinesquit. It is normally narrower at the base and more
styliform in P. townsendii. In some examples of P. ¢. australis and
P. mexicanus the process is almost needle-like. The broad-based form
is encountered in some individuals of all races of P. townsendii, however.
The intermaxillary notch of the palate is narrower posteriorly in
P. rafinesquii than in most individuals of P. townsendit. Likewise,
the anterior nares are relatively small in P. rafinesquii and have the
posterior border angular in outline. Geographically adjacent races of
P. townsendii have the nares larger and the posterior border rounded
in outline. The nares in the more remote P. t. townsend and P. t.
australis are generally large and rounded, but in P. mezicanus and
P.t. pallescens they are relatively small and angular as in P. rofinesquit.
Another characteristic of P. rafinesqui that is geographically vari-
able in P. townsendu is the appearance of the rostrum. In P. rafine-
squirt the rostrum is typically weak and much depressed. On the other
hand, adjacent races of P. townsendii, P. t. ingens and P. t. virginianus,
as well as P. t. townsendvi, have the rostrum strong and not depressed.
The rostrum usually is not so weak or depressed in P. t. australis and
P. t. pallescens as in P. rafinesqun. P. mexicanus, showing these
characters in the extreme, is similar to P. rafinesquit.
Skeletons are not available for all of the races of either species, but
it appears that the presternum may have taxonomic worth. In speci-
mens examined, all lobes, but particularly the ventral lobe, were more
expanded in P. rafinesquv thanin P. townsendi (fig. 5). The presternum
of P. mexicanus is intermediate between these extremes.
RELATIONSHIPS: Plecotus rafinesquv is the most primitive living
member of the subgenus Corynorhinus. It is similar in many respects
P. mexicanus (see p. 143). It is more distinct from geographically
contiguous races of P. townsendw (ingens and virginianus) than it is
from some of the geographically more remote races (pallescens and
townsendit) of that species. This indicates a considerable period of
isolation for P. rafinesquii and a subsequent extension of range to
bring the more progressive P. townsendit into geographical contact with
P. rafinesquii. Isolation for P. rafinesquii is further confirmed by the
fact that primitive traits (e.g., secondary cusp on I', anterointernal
cingular cusp on P*, triangular shape of median postpalatal process,
small anterior nares and intermaxillary notch) which are constant or
nearly so in P. rafinesquii are normally variable in P. townsendit.
The coloration of P. rafinesquii, the only character separating all
individuals of the Recent species of the subgenus Corynorhinus, most
154 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
resembles the coloration of the more primitive subgenera [dionycteris
and Plecotus.
Remarks: Referring to a visit to the “lower parts of the Ohio, the
Wabash, Green River, Barrens, Prairies, and the States of Indiana,
Illinois, etc.,’’ Rafinesque (1818, p. 446) described nine species of bats,
ten mice and shrews, and a number of snakes and fish. Four of the
nine species of bats and a number of the mice and shrews cannot be
related to species known to occur in the lower Ohio Valley. The de-
scription of one of the bats, Vespertilio megalotis, suggests what we
now know as Plecotus: “‘Vespertuio megalotis. R. (Big-eared bat.)
Tail three-eighths of total length, body dark gray above, pale gray
beneath, ears very large, duplicated, auricles nearly as long. Length
4 inches, breadth 12 inches.”’ Most of Rafinesque’s contemporaries
thought his V. megalotis was related to Eurasian Plecotus. Lesson
(1827, p. 96) paraphrased Rafinesque’s description of V. megalotis
and renamed it Plecotus rafinesquii. He stated that it was ‘perhaps
only a variety of our long-eared bat [European Plecotus].”’
After a brief period of use, V. megalotis and P. rafinesquii fell into
obscurity, and Plecotus macrotis of LeConte (1831, p. 431) came into
universal usage as the name for the big-eared bat of the eastern
United States.
A. H. Howell’s (1909, p. 68) collection of a second species of big-
eared bat at Burkes Garden in the Allegheny Mountains of Virginia
in 1908 led to G. M. Allen’s resurrection of the name V. megalotis. In
his revision of the genus (now subgenus) Corynorhinus, Allen (1916,
p. 339) wrote:
The discovery of a Corynorhinus (szc) distinct from C. macrotis, from extreme
western Virginia, westward, in the eastern United States was wholly unexpected.
It is the eastern representative of the desert-colored pallescens of west-central
United States, from which it chiefly differs in its somewhat darker, more drab,
coloration.
On the basis of specimens from Virginia, Kansas, and Colorado,
Allen supposed that this Plecotus, distinct from P. macrotis, had a
range continuous across the Ohio and upper Mississippi valleys from
Virginia to Kansas and Colorado. His Kansas and Colorado specimens
were somewhat paler than those from Virginia, indicating, Allen
thought, intergradation with the western pallescens. He presumed
that specimens from Kentucky and Indiana, recorded in literature as
P. macrotis, had been misidentified, and were actually representatives
of the newly discovered second species. With the range that he
envisioned for the second species, Allen’s choice of Rafinesque’s old
name, Vespertilio megalotis (type locality, lower Ohio River), as the
name for it was a logical step. In the absence of material from the
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 155
type region, Allen considered specimens from Burkes Garden, Va.,
to be typical.
That Vesperiilio megalotis Rafinesque is a junior homonym of Vesper-
tilio megalotis Bechstein (1800, p. 622) escaped Allen’s notice. Bech-
stein’s V. megalotis is based on Le Vaillant’s (1796, p. 279) description
of a bat that came into his tent while he was one or two day’s journey
north of the Orange River in Great Namaqualand, South-West Africa
(about lat. 28° S.). There is little doubt that Bechstein’s Vespertilo
megalotis is a member of the megadermatid genus Lavia. The descrip-
tion, except for the measurements, is an accurate one for that genus.
No specimen of this family has been reported subsequently south of
lat. 15° S:
Thomas (1916, p. 127) pointed out the unavailability of the name
V. megalotis for an American bat and proposed the substitution of
P. rafinesquir Lesson in its place. Subsequently the two eastern
American species of Plecotus have been known as P. macrotis (South-
eastern States) and P. rafinesquu (North-Central States). Collections
of Plecotus from north of the Ohio River have never been critically
examined (e.g., Lyon, 1936, p. 86).
Numerous specimens of big-eared bats are now available from the
type region of Lesson’s P. rafinesquii: the Ohio Valley and upper
Mississippi Valley States of Tennessee, Kentucky, Illinois, Indiana,
Ohio, and West Virginia. All of those specimens are the “‘C. macrotis’’
of G. M. Allen. Big-eared bats from a small portion of the Appala-
ehian Highlands in western Virginia, eastern West Virginia, and east-
ern Kentucky are the “C. rafinesquii” of G. M. Allen. Likewise,
specimens from the Ozark Highlands of northwestern Arkansas, and
from the gypsum cave area of south-central Kansas, Oklahoma, and
northern Texas are the “C. rafinesquit’”’ of G. M. Allen. Instead of
having a continuous distribution from Virginia to Kansas as Allen
supposed, his “C. rafinesquii”’ apparently is isolated in the central
Appalachians, and reappears again to the westward only in the Ozark
Highlands and beyond.
Further, Lesson’s description of P. rafinesquii, ‘“Pelage dark gray
above, and pale gray below ... .” comes closer to the yellowish
brown above, grayish white below of Allen’s ‘“C. macrotis’ than it
does to Allen’s “C. rafinesquit”’ which is reddish brown above, buffy
below. In this connection, Neill’s observation (1953, p. 383) on the
appearance of a live example of P. macrotis is pertinent:
In life, the dorsal hairs were dark, grayish-black with light, horn-colored tips.
These light tips were very inconspicuous, however, and to casual inspection the
upper surfaces were grayish-black. The ventral hairs were dark gray with whitish
tips which were more evident posteriorly.
156 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
My own observations of living specimens of the mid-Appalachian big-
eared bat (‘‘C. rafinesquiz”’ of G. M. Allen) show it to be as brown in
appearance when living as when made up as a study skin. It could
not be described as “‘dark gray above’”’ under any circumstances.
Thus, as first pointed out by G. M. Allen (1916, p. 339), there are
two species of Plecotus in the eastern United States. Current applica-
tion of names and delineation of geographic distributions for the two
species are incorrect, however. One species inhabits the southeastern
and central United States. The names P. rafinesquii Lesson (=V.
megalotis Rafinesque) (type locality, “Lower Ohio Valley’) and P.
macrotis LeConte (type locality, ‘“Georgia’”’) are available for it. The
earlier name is P. rafinesquii Lesson. The second species inhabits
the central Appalachian Highlands, the Ozark Highlands, and the
western United States, southwestern Canada, and Mexico. The
earliest name for this species is P. townsendii Cooper (type locality,
“Columbia River’) (Handley, 1955c, p. 147).
Although the geographic ranges of P. rafinesquii and P. townsendii
overlap in the Appalachian Highlands and are at least contiguous in
the Ozark Highlands, the two forms have never been taken at the
same locality. Frum (1948, p. 418) secured specimens of typical P.
rafinesquti near the region inhabited by P. townsendzi in West Virginia.
Barbour (1957, p. 141) collected typical P. townsendii within the range
of P. rafinesquii in Powell County, Ky. Welter and Sollberger (1939,
p. 79) reported P. townsendii from nearby Rowan County, Ky. How-
ever, this identification is questionable since no specimen was pre-
served (Barbour, 1957, p. 141). Typical P. rafinesquii (MCZ 6062)
has been collected on the Osage River in Arkansas. This locality
cannot be pinpointed but may be within the range of P. townsendit.
A skeleton (KU 5645) of P. rafinesquii from Crawford County, Ark.
(Black, 1936, p. 30), was secured near collecting stations of P. town-
sendii, but at a lower elevation, in the Lower Austral zone.
P. rafinesquii is polytypic. One geographic race inhabits the At-
lantic and Gulf Coast regions, the other the area west of the Appala-
chians and north of Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana. lLesson’s
name P. rafinesquii can be used for the interior race, and LeConte’s
P. macrotis for the coastal race.
Hasirat: Plecotus rafinesquit occurs in a forested region largely
devoid of natural caves. It has been observed most frequently in
buildings. Natural roosting places are hollow trees, crevices behind
loose bark, and similar arboreal retreats. Lowery (1943, p. 224) found
it in hollow trees (as well as in buildings) in Louisiana; a specimen in
the U.S. National Museum was collected in a hollow cypress in the
Dismal Swamp of Virginia; and Harper (1927, p. 280) was told of one
that had been found under dry leaves in a cypress swamp in Georgia.
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 157
In some regions where natural caves occur, P. rafinesquit has been
found in buildings but not in caves, despite diligent search. Thus,
the only specimen from Florida Caverns State Park was taken in a
building (Sherman, 1945, p. 201). Hibbard (1954, in litt.) found the
species only in the attic of an old house at Mammoth Cave, Ky.
Where P. rafinesquiz occurs with some frequency in caves, it usually
has been found in small caves, or near the entrances of larger caverns.
P. M. Smith (1954, in litt.) found an individual 25 feet from the
entrance of a small cave in Indiana and another 50 feet from the en-
trance of a small limestone cave in Ohio. Ganier (1954, in litt.) found
numerous individuals 30 to 100 feet from the entrance of a small cave
on a wooded mountainside, 400 feet above a valley floor in Tennessee.
Hahn (1908, p. 145) observed this species in Indiana only in dim
light near cave entrances and believed (1909, p. 619) that it is not
truly a cave dweller. However, all records from the northern fringe
of the range of this species are from caves or subterranean excavations
and, it should be noted, all are for the cooler months of the year
(October to May), indicating, possibly, a choice of some other roosting
place during the warmer months.
P. rafinesquir also inhabits other cave substitutes. Neill (1953,
p. 282) reported one that was found clinging to the wall of an artificial
limestone grotto, built for ornamental purposes and overgrown with
ferns and mosses so as to resemble natural limestone caverns which
are numerous around Silver Springs, Fla. Moore (1949a, p. 60)
recorded finding big-eared bats on two occasions in a concrete culvert
(66X75 feet) at the bottom of a ravine, some 40 feet deep, which
probably had water running through it the year around (Florida).
Goodpaster and Hoffmeister (1952, p. 365) found big-eared bats on
several occasions in western Tennessee in an open cistern, 20 feet
deep, built in the shape of a bottle, with open top about 2% feet in
diameter extending about 3 feet above the ground, and containing
about an inch of water at the bottom. In warm weather the bats
hung near the top; in cold weather near the bottom. Harper (1927,
p. 280) noted that a Plecotus had been found in a turpentine still in
the Okefenokee Swamp.
P. rafinesquii roosts both in occupied and abandoned buildings.
In the Great Smoky Mountains, Stupka (1954, in litt.) found this
species to be a regular inhabitant of a house that had been abandoned
for about 15 years. Two or three rooms and the attic were utilized
by the bats. He reported others that had been found in a schoolhouse
(in summer) and in a Civilian Conservation Corps camp building.
In the same region, the Komareks (1938, p. 148) found Plecotus in
the attic of an abandoned schoolhouse and on the chimney, above
the hearth, in an occupied cabin. Barbour (1957, p. 141) located a
158 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
colony in the attic and storerooms of a large log building in a recreation
camp. In North Carolina, Brimley (1945(?), p. [10]) reported it in
an “old house,” and Odum (1949, p. 188) had a specimen from an
occupied dwelling. Some South Carolina specimens have come from
a barn (Schwartz, 1954, in litt.) and from a closet in an occupied
dwelling (ChM specimen labels). Harper (1927, pp. 279-281)
recorded that residents of the Okefenokee Swamp had observed
Plecotus most frequently in buildings—on several occasions during
services in a meeting-house, in occupied dwelling houses (on wall
near ceiling, and on chimney), in a shanty, in a commissary, and
beneath the flooring of a railway telephone booth. In Florida
big-eared bats have been discovered in the headquarters building of
an Indian reservation (E. V. Komarek, 1954, in litt.) and in the base-
ment of an occupied dwelling in an urban area (Moore, 1949b, p. 50).
Alabama records cite the ceiling of a small round gatehouse and the
garret of an old abandoned grist mill (A. H. Howell, 1921, p. 28).
In Louisiana, Vernon Bailey (field notes) found it in the attic of a
large plantation house, and Louisiana State University specimen
labels record it from occupied farm houses.
Beruavior: P. rafinesqui seems to be rather unsociable. Solitary
individuals are more commonly encountered than clusters of indi-
viduals. Summer colonies have been recorded as follows: 5 gravid
females, Houma, La., 12 May (Vernon Bailey, field notes); 20 or 25
(3 collected were gravid females) in small cave in Warren County,
Tenn., 31 May (Ganier, 1954, in litt.); breeding colony (females and
young) in Breathitt County, Ky., 14 June (Barbour, 1957, p. 141);
3 females and 1 small young collected near Baton Rouge, La., 17 June
(LSU specimen labels). Five of unspecified sex were taken at
Taylorsville, N.C., on 25 August (Brimley, 1945(?), p. [10]); and a
group of seven, of both sexes, were collected at Cades Cove, Tenn.,
on 15 July (Stupka, 1954, in litt.).
Winter aggregations (usually consisting of both sexes) are more
numerous, but even at this season solitary individuals are frequently
encountered. Stupka (1954, in litt.) collected 11 in a house near
Gatlinburg, Tenn., on 17 November, but the bats were scattered in
two or three rooms and the attic; seven were collected in Georgetown
County, S.C., on 18 December (ChM specimen labels); Ganier
(1954, in litt.) has reported small groups in caves of Warren County,
Tenn., on 19 March and in early September; and in western Tennessee
Goodpaster and Hoffmeister (1952, p. 365) found several big-eared
bats hanging in a clump in an open cistern on 2 September (15 were
collected) and on 13 March found numerous Plecotus in the same
cistern, hanging individually and in two or three small clumps (25
specimens taken).
|
|
|
AMERICAN BATS—-HANDLEY 159
Many references to P. rafinesqui specify that no other species
of bats were found in the same building or cave. Stupka (1954, in
litt.) mentioned that the abandoned house near Gatlinburg, Tenn.,
in which he found big-eared bats for several years, was shared with
wood rats (Neotoma). Pipistreilus was found on four occasions and
Plecotus twice in a Florida culvert, but not on the same dates (Moore,
1949a, p. 60).
The sleeping P. rafinesquiti hangs head downward with its ears
curved backward and flattened against the sides of its neck. In this
position the anterior edge of the ear is uppermost and forms a, half
ellipse. The posterior portion of the ear folds along its transverse
ribs like an accordion. When the bat wakes the ears are usually
straightened slowly (Hahn, 1909, p. 619).
Residents of the Okefenokee Swamp told Harper (1927, p. 280) of a
peculiar motion of the ears of these bats. One was discovered on
the wall of a commissary when it attracted attention by “‘waving”’ its
ears. Another that was seen several times in a railway telephone
booth “wagged”’ its ears alternately. Several other informants also
mentioned ‘‘ear-wagging.”’
P. rafinesquw must be strictly nocturnal, for it has never been
observed in twilight flight.
Hahn, (1908, p. 177) experimented with the ability of bats to avoid
obstacles. His subjects were mostly Myotis and Pipistrellus but
included one Plecotus rafinesqui. The big-eared bat struck vertical
wires 52 out of 102 chances, while in contrast Myotis and Pipistrellus
struck on 24 to 25 percent of the chances and Eptesicus on 67 percent.
In these experiments there may have been a relationship between
wingspread of bat and success of avoidance. Hahn noted that the
flight of captive Plecotus was swift and steady and that both Myotis
and Plecotus in attempting to escape from a captivity room repeatedly
flew against window panes and screens with great force.
Several references to P. rafinesquii indicate a variable agility in
avoiding capture. One that began flying about during a service (17
July) in the meeting-house on Billy’s Island in the Okefenokee Swamp
was caught by hand by a member of the congregation (Harper, 1927,
p. 280). Goodpaster and Hoffmeister (1952, p. 365) found (25 May)
a Plecotus hanging in the upper part of a cistern that had an opening
at the top 2 feet in diameter. When disturbed the bat first flew to
the bottom of the cistern and there circled until forced to attempt to
_ escape through the top. It was then captured by hand. Hahn (1909,
|
|
|
|
|
|
if
p. 619) saw two of these bats on 22 February in a cave at Mitchell,
Ind. They avoided capture and flew out of the cave into the cold
winter air. A solitary individual in a mine tunnel in Illinois (5 Octo-
497256—59 5
160 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
ber) avoided three persons and escaped out of the tunnel (Elder,
1946, p. 434). An immature that Hamilton (1930, p. 308) found
injured on a Kentucky roadway may have struck a vehicle.
On the authority of a local informant Harper (1927, p. 280) reported
the voice of P. rafinesqua as a “‘fizzling noise.”
Foop: The food habits of Plecotus rafinesquii appear to be un-
recorded. Specimens that Hahn (1909, p. 619) kept in captivity
refused food and soon died.
Mieration: There is no evidence of migration by this species. It
has been found at all seasons throughout its range except in the ex-
treme northern part, where it has been discovered only in winter
(October to May).
Hisernation: Whether Plecotus rafinesquit becomes lethargic in
the winter in all parts of its range is not certain. At least under some
circumstances it does truly hibernate. Goodpaster and Hoffmeister
(1952, p. 365) found (13 March) big-eared bats hibernating near the
bottom of an open cistern. ‘The bats were cold and sluggish and made
no attempt to escape when placed ina cage. A February observation
in the Okefenokee Swamp reported by Harper (1927, p. 280) suggests
injury or hibernation. On the other hand, specimens found in No-
vember in a culvert near Satsuma, Fla., had to be captured with a
net (Moore, 1949a, p. 60). One that Elder (1946, p. 433) found in
a mine in southern Illinois on 5 October was very alert and escaped
out of the mine when it was approached. Two that Hahn (1909,
p. 619) saw on 22 February in a Mitchell, Ind., cave escaped capture
and flew out into the cold air.
Repropuction: The season of mating and length of gestation are
not known in this species. ‘The young usually are born in late May
or early June, shed their milk dentition by mid-July, and reach full
size and assume the adult pelage in August or early September.
With regard to a female captured near Satsuma, Fla., on 5 Novem-
ber, Moore (1949a, p. 60) reported that her ‘“‘vulva was perforate,
reddish, and swollen. Her teats were dry and her uterus was empty.”
Schwartz noted on specimen labels that testes were prominent in all
males captured near Andrews, N.C., on 19 and 20 January. Good-
paster and Hoffmeister (1952, p. 365) observed that bats taken in
hibernation in Obion County, Tenn., on 13 March began mating
after warm surroundings had overcome their lethargy.
Vernon Bailey (field notes) collected females containing single
well-developed embryos in the attic of a large plantation house near
Houma, La., on 12 May. On 31 May, in a Tennessee cave, Ganier
(1954, in litt.) found females with pregnancy so advanced that birth
of the one young of each seemed imminent. Barbour (1957, p. 141)
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 161
reported a nursery colony in Kentucky in which the young averaged
66 mm. in total length on 22 June.
A specimen (LSU 1846) with milk teeth still in place, M? and M?
not fully erupted, no trace of postjuvenile molt, and total length of
71 mm., was collected near Baton Rouge, La., on 17 June. AMNH
70517 with some milk teeth still in place, M?® not fully erupted, no
trace of postjuvenile molt, and total length of 84 mm. was collected
near Quicksand, Ky., on 8 July. LSU i397, collected on 28 June in
Nachitoches Parish, La., has mature dentition, no trace of post-
juvenile molt, and total length of 88 mm. Individuals almost full-
grown (total length 93, 98, 99, and 100 mm.), and molting to a post-
juvenile pelage, have been collected in South Carolina and Alabama
on 24 July, 17 August, and 22 August. However, UI 853, collected
on 2 September in Tennessee, although almost full-grown (total
length 101 mm.), shows no trace of the postjuvenile molt.
Mott: Molt is evident on the head, neck, and underparts, but not
on the back of ChM 33.188.3 (24 July); on head, neck, underparts,
and rump of ChM 33.218.3 (17 August); on neck and upper back, and
almost completed on the belly of ChM 33.218.2 (17 August); and on
all parts of the body of USNM 180198 (22 August).
Molting in adults has been noted only in two specimens, both of
which show molt on all parts of the body: USNM 201714, male,
Alabama, 4 July; and ChM 33.218.4, female, South Carolina, 17
August.
Plecotus rafinesquii macrotis LeConte
Plec{otus] macrotis LeConte, 1831, p. 431.
Plecotus lecontit Cooper, 1837, p. 72, pl. 3, fig.5. (Substitute name for macrotis.)
Vesp[ertilio] macrotis Lesson, 1842, p. 23. (Not Vespertilio macrotis Temminck,
1840, p. 218=Pipistrellus imbricatus Horsfield.)
S[ynotus] Lecontit Wagner, 1855, p. 720.
Synotus macrotis H. Allen, 1864, p. 63. (Not Synotus macrotis Wagner, 1855, p.
719=Pipistrellus imbricatus Horsfield.)
Clorynorhinus] macrotis H. Allen, 1865, p. 174.
Corynorhinus rafinesquit Handley, 1955c, p. 147.
Hototyrer: None designated. Type locality subsequently fixed
(Miller, 1897, p. 51) near the LeConte plantation, 5 miles south of
Riceboro, Liberty County, Ga., (see p. 162.)
_ Disrrisution: Southeastern United States (fig. 19). Northeast-
ward to Dismal Swamp, Va. Southwestward to Terrebonne, West
- Baton Rouge, and Natchitoches Parishes, La.; and McCurtain and
LeFlore Counties, Okla. Inland to Dismal Swamp, Va.; Bertie and
Wayne Counties, N. C.; Darlington County, S. C.; Autauga and Green
Counties, Ala.; Kemper County, Miss., and Crawford County, Ark.
Zonal distribution, Lower Austral. Altitudinal distribution, sea level
to about 500 feet.
162 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Description: As for the species. In adults, hairs of upper parts
blackish basally; tips between Sayal Brown and Snuff Brown. Hairs
of underparts blackish basally, with a slight reddish tinge; tips
whitish with a yellowish buff cast.
MEASUREMENTS: See tables 9, 15.
Comparisons: Compared with P. r. rafinesquii, P. r. macrotis has
coloration darker, more brownish dorsally; mass effect of the under
parts less clear white, more yellowish; and mesopterygoid fossa and
postdentary part of palate averaging narrower.
Remarks: Body size averages small in populations in southern
Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana (tables 9, 15). Specimens from
other parts of the range of P. r. macrotis (Atlantic coast and Arkansas,
Oklahoma, and northern Louisiana average larger in body size, and
resemble P. r. rafinesquit in this respect. There is no corresponding
variation in coloration. Morphologically large and morphologically
small populations of P. r. macrotis are similarly colored and are equally
distinct from P. r. rafinesquit.
Intergradation between P. r. macrotis and P. r. rafinesquit is shown
in numerous specimens. Some from Sevier County, N.C., dorsally
are like typical P. 7. rafinesquit, but some show traces of the yellowish
ventral coloration characteristic of P. r. macrotis. Individuals from
Marshall and Weaverville, N.C., and Huntsville, Ala., are more per-
fectly intermediate in all details of coloration, but are nearer P. r.
rafinesquit. A specimen from Leighton, Ala., approaches Gulf Coast
populations of P. 7. macrotis in size, but is like P. r. rafinesquit in colora-
tion. Specimens from central and northern Louisiana are unac-
countably variable in coloration but average nearer P. r. macrotis.
Characters of P. 7. macrotis apparently are most accentuated in coastal
plain populations. Those of P. r. rafinesquii are found west of the
Appalachians, from Tennessee northward.
Although there is no assurance that the specimens upon which
LeConte based his description of Plecotus macrotis came from his
plantation near Riceboro, it is reasonably certain that they came from
Georgia. The original description stated the range simply as the
“United States,” but in a later note on macrotis, LeConte (1855, p.
437) specified that it “inhabits Georgia.” There are two LeConte
specimens of Plecotus in the U.S. National Museum, perhaps the very
specimens upon which the description of macrotis was based. Both —
are skulls only, labeled simply “United States.”” Both could very
well have come from the same coastal locality, possibly from the Le- _
Conte Plantation. Since coastal Georgia is an area probably typical
of the coastal race of P. rafinesquii, and lacking evidence that Le-
Conte’s description was based on specimens from elsewhere, I follow
Miller (1897, p. 51) in designating the vicinity of the LeConte Planta- |
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 163
tion, 5 miles south of Riceboro, Liberty County, Ga., as the type
locality of P. r. macrotis.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED: A total of 56 from the following U.S. local-
ities:
Vireinia: Nansemond County or Norfolk County: Lake Drummond, Dismal
Swamp, 1ls(USNM). Sours Carourna: Charleston County: Hampton Plantation,
Santee, 4s (ChM). Darlington County: Society Hill, 28 (USNM). Dorchester
County (?): Summerville, 1s (ChM). Georgetown County: Darlington Plantation,
9s (ChM). WNo ezact locality, 23 (USNM). Groratia: Early County: Kesler, la
(MCZ). ‘United States’? [=Liberty County: 5 miles south of Riceboro?], 2s
(USNM). Fiorina: Hendry County: Big Cypress Seminole Indian Reservation
Headquarters, 27 miles east-southeast of Immokalee, 1s (USNM). Marion
County: Silver Springs, la (USNM). Atasama: Autauga County: Autaugaville,
2a (USNM). Mississippi: Hancock County: Bay St. Louis, 1a (USNM). West-
ville, Is (USNM). Lovistana: East Baton Rouge Parish: Baton Rouge, and 3
miles south of Baton Rouge, 7s (LSU), 1s (USNM). Madison Parish: Tallulah,
2a (USNM); Waverly, 1s (LSU). Natchitoches Parish: Kisatchie, 3s (LSU).
Terrebonne Parish: 9 miles southeast of Houma, 3s (USNM). West Baton Rouge
Parish: Lobdell, ls (USNM). Arxansas: Crawford County: Mulberry, 1b (KU).
Sevier County: Near Horatio, ls (OAM). County uncertain: “Osage River,” la
(MCZ). Oxtanoma: McCurtain County: 2.5 miles west of Smithville, 5s; UOMZ).
ADDITIONAL RECORDS: The following records probably refer to this
form:
NortH Carourna: Bertie County: No exact locality (Brimley, 1905, p. 22),
Wayne County: Goldsboro (Brimley, 1905, p. 22). SouraH Carouina: Beaufort
County: Hardeeville (Miller, 1897, p. 52). Georata: Charlton County: Okefe-
nokee Swamp (Harper, 1927, p. 279). Ware County: Okefenokee Swamp (Harper,
1927, p. 280). Fuoripa: Alachua County: Micanopy (H. Allen, 1864, p. 65).
Jackson County: Florida Caverns State Park, near Marianna (Sherman, 1945,
p. 201). Levy County: Gulf Hammock (Pearson, 1954, p. 474). Orange County:
Zellwood (Moore, 1949b, p. 50). Putnam County: 1.6 miles north of Satsuma
(Moore, 1949a, p. 60). ALABAMA: Greene County: Eutaw (H. Allen, 1864, p. 65).
Hale County: Greensboro (Miller, 1897, p. 52). Mussissrppr: Kemper County:
No exact locality (H. Allen, 1864, p. 65). Louisiana: Lincoln Parish: Ruston
(Lowery, 1943, p. 224). Orleans Parish: New Orleans (Lowery, 1936, p. 18).
Rapides Parish: Alexandria (Dalquest & Werner, 1954, p. 156). OxkLAHOMA:
Le Flore County: Houston (Blair, 1939, p. 102).
Plecotus rafinesquii rafinesquii Lesson
Vespertilio megalotis Rafinesque, 1818, p. 446. (Not Vespertilio megalotis
Bechstein, 1800.)
Plecotus rafinesquii Lesson, 1827, p. 96.
Plecotus macrotis Garman, 1894, p. 58.
Corynorhinus macrotis Butler, 1895, p. 86.
Corynorhinus rafinesquii Handley, 1955c, p. 147.
Houotyren: None designated. Type locality: “. . . lower parts of
| the Ohio, the Wabash, Green River, Barrens, Prairies, and the states
of Indiana, Illinois, etc.’’ (Rafinesque, 1818, p. 446). Herein
restricted to Mount Carmel, Wabash County, Ill. (see p. 164).
164 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM YO. 110
DistrisuTion: East-central United States (fig. 19). North to
Nicholas County, W. Va.; Adams County, Ohio; Putnam County,
Ind.; Wabash and Alexander Counties, Ill. West to Putnam County,
Ind.; Alexander County, Iil.; and Obion County, Tenn. South to
Obion County, Tenn.; Colbert and Madison Counties, Ala.; Towns
County, Ga.; and Macon, Transylvania, and Alexander Counties,
N.C. East to Alexander County, N.C. and Nicholas County,
W. Va. Zonal distribution: Upper Austral and lower portions of
Transition. Altitudinal distribution: From 400 feet above sea level
in western Tennessee to 3,850 feet in western North Carolina.
Description: As for the species. In adults, hairs of upperparts
blackish basally; tips between Sepia and Buffy Brown. Hairs of
underparts black at base, almost pure white at tip.
MEASUREMENTS: See tables 9, 15.
Comparisons: For comparison with P. r. macrotis, see page 162.
Remarks: Rafinesque’s specimens, which led to the description of
P. rafinesquii by Lesson, are not known to be still in existence.
This material is said to have been secured on the ‘‘. . . lower parts
of the Ohio, the Wabash, Green River, Barrens, Prairies, and the
states of Indiana, Illinois, ete.” (Rafinesque, 1818, p. 446). The
big-eared bat is not known to occur as far north as the Green River,
and it has not been taken on the barrens or prairies of Illinois, Indiana,
or Kentucky. Neither has it been taken on the banks of the Ohio
River, although it undoubtedly occurs there. However, there are
specimens in the U.S. National Museum secured in 1896 and 1903 at
Mount Carmel on the Wabash River in Illinois, a region specifically
mentioned by Rafinesque. In addition, the species is also known to
have occurred at other localities in Illinois and Indiana. Conse-
quently, I propose that the type locality of Plecctus rafinesquii rafines-
quit Lesson be restricted to Mount Carmel, Wabash County, Ill.
Plecotus rafinesquit seems to be rare near the northern limits of its
range. Despite repeated investigations, the caves and mines of
Illinois have produced but two recent records (Elder, 1946, p. 4383;
and Smith and Parmalee, 1954, p. 204); Indiana, two (P. M. Smith,
1953, specimen submitted to U.S. Nat. Mus.; and R. E. Mumford,
1954, in litt.); Ohio, one (Goslin, 1954, p. 480); West Virginia, one
(Frum, 1948, p. 418); and Kentucky, two (Barbour, 1957, p. 141;
and Hibbard, 1954, in litt.).
Plecotus may have occurred in Pennsylvania within historic times,
but it has not been found there by recent investigators (Mohr, 1954,
p. 21). Harrison Alien (1864, p. 64) stated that ‘I am informed by
Prof. Baird that specimens of a Synotus, probably of this species
[Synotus macrotis], were received some years ago by the Smithsonian
Institution, from Meadville, Pa., but that they have become in some
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 165
way misplaced and are not now to be found.” I have checked the
early catalogs of the U.S. National Museum and have failed to find
any record of big-eared bats from Pennsylvania. In 1857 and again
on two occasions in 1861 specimens were received from J. T. Thuckston
of Meadville, Pa. These were Condylura, Myotis, Tamiasciurus,
Peromyscus, and Microtus. If big-eared bats were received from the
same source they apparently were never cataloged.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED: A total of 50 from the following U.S. local-
ities:
NortH Carouina: Buncombe County: Weaverville, 1s (USNM). Cherokee
County: 4 miles east-southeast of Andrews, 1s (AS). Madison County: Marshall,
ls (MCZ). Swain County: 14 miles northeast of Andrews, 5s (AS); Forney
Creek, 2,400 feet, 9 miles northwest of Bryson City, 1s (USNM). Gzorarta:
Towns County: Young Harris, ls (USNM). Auasama: Colbert County: Forster’s
Mill on Town Creek, 5 miles east of Leighton, ls (USNM). Madison County:
Monte Sano, 1,600 feet, southeast of Huntsville, Is (USNM). TENNESSEE:
Blount County: Cades Cove, 1,750 feet, 1s (USNM). Campbell County: Well
Springs, Powell Valley, ls (OSM). Obion County: 10 miles northeast of Tipton-
ville, 6s (UI). Sevier County: Sugarlands area, 1,900 feet, 3 miles south of
Gatlinburg, 13ab (USNM). Warren County: McMinnville, 1s (CNMH).
Kentucky: Breathitt County: Noble, 5s (UK); Quicksand, Is (AMNH).
Inuinois: Alexander County: One-half mile north of Olive Branch, 1s (INHS).
Wabash County: Mount Carmel, 2a (USNM). Inprana: Lawrence County:
Mitchell, Upper Twin Cave, 1s (UI), ls (USNM). Washington County: Near
Salem, ls (OSM). Onto: Adams County: Waggoner Ripple Cave, Green Town-
ship, ls (OSM). West Virainita: Nicholas County: Collison Cave, near Mt.
Lookout, 1s (CM), 2s (GF).
ADDITIONAL RECORDS: The following records probably refer to this
form:
NortH Carouina: Alexander County: 10 miles northwest of Taylorsville (G. M.
Allen, 1916, p. 351). Macon County: Highlands, 3,850 feet (Odum, 1949, p. 188).
Transylvania County: Pink Beds, head of South Fork of Mills River, 3,300 feet,
Pisgah National Forest (Oberholser, 1905, p. 9). THNNESSEE: Franklin County:
“Southeast portion’? (Ganier, 1954, in litt.). Sevier County: Greenbrier Cove
(Komarek and Komarek, 1938, p. 148). Warren County: Near Hubbard’s or Bat
Cave, 8 miles north of Beersheba Springs (Ganier, 1954, in litt.). Kenruckxy:
Edmonson County: Mammoth Cave (Hibbard, 1954, in litt.). Warren County:
Bowling Green (Garman, 1894, p. 58). Iniinois: Alezander County: Eleo (Elder,
1946, p. 433). Inprana: Putnam County: 5 miles southwest of Greencastle
(Butler, 1895, p.86). Washington County: Near Saltillo (Mumford, 1954, in litt.).
Plecotus townsendii Cooper
Synonymy is given under the subspecies.
Distrispution: Central Appalachian Highlands, Ozark Highlands,
western United States, southwestern Canada, and Mexico south to
the Isthmus of Tehuantepec (figs. 22-24).
Description: Adult coloration: Hairs of upperparts gray or slate
at base; color of tip varying from pale cinnamon brown to blackish
166 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
brown; division between colors of tip and base often not sharp; hairs
at posterior bases of ears frequently paler than those of other parts of
dorsum. Mass effect darkens with wear. Hairs of chest and belly
slate, gray, or brownish at base, brownish or buff at tip, the division
between the colors often not sharp; hairs of chin and throat like
remainder of underparts or with darker colored tips; hairs bordering
membranes with bases colored like tips. Immature like adult, except
darker or duller throughout.
Size varies from medium to large for the subgenus; forearm varies
from medium, relative to skull length, to long; presternum with lobes
not expanded (ventral lobe narrower at tip than lateral lobe) (fig. 5).
Rostrum varies from weak and depressed to strong and not depressed;
anterior nares relatively small to relatively large, and posterior
border rounded, or with angular shape; intermaxillary notch usually
relatively broad; median postpalatal process usually styliform, with
narrow base (sometimes triangular); auditory bulla averages relatively
large; brain case averages relatively shallow for subgenus. I! with
secondary cusp varying from prominent to absent (fig. 2); P* with
small anterointernal cingular cusp varying from present to absent.
Tragus (possibly also auricle) averages relatively long; cross-ribs on
interfemoral membrane average 10 or more.
ComParRIsons: See pages 138, 140, 142, and 151.
ReELATIoNsHIps: Of the three Recent species of the subgenus
Corynorhinus, P. townsendii has the largest geographic range and the
greatest environmental tolerance. Its geographic range almost spans
the continent from east to west and extends through 35 degrees of
latitude. It inhabits broadleaf deciduous forests, coniferous forests,
prairies, and desert scrub; cool, humid, rain forests and hot, arid,
deserts; coastal lowlands and high mountains; areas with great
annual temperature variation and areas with slight annual temperature
variations.
The other species of the subgenus are much more restricted: P.
mexicanus to the cool, humid, highlands of northern and central
Mexico; P. rafinesquii to the warm, humid, lowlands of the south-
eastern United States.
P. mexicanus and P. rafinesquti appear to be genetically stable and
only slightly variable, whereas P. townsendii is so variable that several
geographic races are recognized. P. townsendit appears to be the
most plastic, progressive species of the genus Plecotus.
Remarks: Plecotus townsendii was long known only by the Colum-
bia River specimens upon which Cooper based his 1837 description.
Beginning with Harrison Allen in 1864, P. townsendii was confused by
all authors with P. rafinesquit (=P. maerotis) until the two species
were recognized as distinct by G. M. Allen in 1916. Allen continued
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 167
the confusion of names, however, believing P. rafinesquit and P.
macrotis to be the names applicable to the two species. It is now
evident (p. 156) that both of these names apply to a single species of
the southeastern United States, and that P. townsendii is the name
to be used for the wide-ranging species inhabiting parts of Canada, the
United States, and Mexico.
Hasirat: In a species so widely distributed as P. townsendii, the
formulation of a generalized description of its habitat preferences is a
difficult matter. For the brief description of such a distributional
pattern, the life zones of Merriam are the most useful of the numerous
ecological unit concepts that have been proposed. Such units as the
biotic provinces, faunal areas, biotic areas, and biotic districts of
American authors (Cockrum, 1952, pp. 9-15) are useful in small scale,
as in describing the distribution of an animal in a county or a state,
but they are not adapted to definition of a range continental in scope.
P. townsendit is an inhabitant chiefly of the Upper Sonoran and
Transition life zones, ranging in some places into the cooler Canadian
zone and in others into the warmer Lower Sonoran zone. Eastern
populations occupy parts of the humid subdivisions of the Upper
Sonoran (Upper Austral) and Transition zones.
This species appears to be absent or generally uncommon in prairie
and extreme desert habitats but may be relatively common in a
variety of others. Dalquest (1947, pp. 21-24) provided excellent notes
on habitats of the species in California (west of the Great Valley).
Typical are: Cultivated valleys bordered by broad-leafed trees and
dense thickets of brush; nearby hills with extensive grassy slopes,
groves of oaks, areas of chaparral, and forests of coniferous trees and
madrofia. Oak-covered hills just below the juniper and pifon belt.
Coastal lowland supporting dense, ocean-side vegetation, such as
brush and lush annuals.
Johnson, et al. (1948, p. 343) in the Providence Mountains of the
Mohave Desert found this bat in caves and tunnels near the boundary
between the yucca belt of the lower slopes and the pifion-juniper belt
of the upper slopes of the mountains. In the Pocatello region of
Idaho, Whitlow and Hall (1933, p. 243) observed Plecotus in mine
tunnels in the juniper belt lying between the Douglas fir-aspen zone
of the mountain tops and the sagebrush zone of the valleys.
Most Mexican records for P. townsendiz are from arid regions.
Thus, Hooper (1955, p. 5) found this species at San Andrés where the
hills were grass covered and the nearby mountains were arid, mostly
grassy, but with pines and deciduous oaks scattered over the upper
slopes, and forming thickets and forest on the canyon floors. How-
ever, Goldman (field notes) collected P. townsendii together with P.
mexicanus at more humid localities in Guanajuato and Zacatecas where
168 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VoL. 110
oak, pine, juniper, cypress, madrofia, and mansanita were prominent.
Bailey (1936, p. 387) noted big-eared bats in the pine-fir-hemlock-
broadleaf deciduous forest of western Oregon. Findley and Negus
(1953, p. 237) reported a specimen captured at the edge of a spruce-fir
forest in Colorado.
In Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas, Plecotus occurs in gypsum caves
in the zone of meeting of tall-grass and short-grass prairies. Ozark
and Appalachian populations inhabit caves mostly in oak-hickory
forests. Originally, there were few natural openings in these forests,
and even today cultivated areas are mostly restricted to narrow bands
along valley bottoms. Some Appalachian caves frequented by big-
eared bats are situated in unbroken forest several miles from meadow
and farmland.
Roostine situs: P. townsendii apparently is a true cave bat, for
unlike P. rafinesquit it has not been known to roost in trees. Many
populations of the western United States and Mexico have found to
their liking such man-made structures as abandoned mine tunnels and
pits, wineries, missions, stage stations, etc., and less frequently,
occupied human dwellings. Kast of the Rocky Mountains, P. town-
sendii has been recorded only in caves; never in houses. In some areas
P. townsendii has been quick to appropriate man-made structures as
roosting places. For example, Townsend (1839, p. 325) observed
that it was already a rather common inhabitant of the Hudson’s Bay
Company fur storehouses of the Columbia River district, not long
after the construction of the first buildings in that region.
Pearson, et al. (1952, p. 317) theorized that since natural caves are
few in California, and since most known colonies of Plecotus in that
area inhabit man-made structures, it must have been rare in California
before the advent of civilization. However, beyond a certain point,
increasing the number of roosts does not seem to increase the popula-
tion. Large numbers of mine tunnels dug in the western foothills
of the Sierra Nevada in the last half of the nineteenth century were
subsequently abandoned. Despite the prevalence of apparently suit-
able roosts, P. townsendii does not seem to be more numerous in that
part of California than elsewhere.
Roosts may be classified according to the use made of them by the
bats. For P. townsendii there are at least four categories: Winter
hibernating roosts, occupied by both sexes; summer nursery roosts,
utilized by females and young; ordinary summer roosts, inhabited
mostly by males; and summer night-time roosts, used probably by
both sexes. With regard to the latter, Dalquest (1947, p. 26) has
noted that P. townsendii, in common with several other species of
bats, retires to a convenient cave or building to hang up and rest
after feeding flights at night. By taking advantage of this habit,
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 169
a collector may utilize the night-time roost as an effective trap.
Two small buildings at Lebec, Calif., served as bat traps for Dalquest
on 4 June 1945. At midnight the traps held a Plecotus townsendii,
6 Myotis yuwmanensis, and 2 Myotis volans. Earlier in the night
these same traps caught 11 Myotis yumanensis, 3 Myotis volans,
1 Myotis californicus, and 4 Antrozous pallidus. Three Myotis
thysanodes were taken later in the traps. Often the night-time
retreats are uninhabited by bats during daylight hours.
There is much variation in the selection of specific microhabitats
within the roosting structures chosen by various kinds of bats. Many
authors have noted the preference of P. townsendii for an open ceil-
ing, wall, or beam rather than a crack or crevice as a roosting site.
Apparently this species seldom crawls away from the spot where
it first lands, and thus normally is found hanging in places open
enough to be reached by flying. In Kansas caverns Twente (1955b,
p. 721) observed that this bat characteristically roosted on very rough
walls. Wind currents and consequently temperature fluctuations were
often great in such places. However, the bats usually rested in slight
concavities or behind projections on the rough walls. In these pockets,
air movement was slight and the temperature relatively constant in
contrast to the gross conditions prevailing a few inches away.
The intensity of light in roosting sites of P. townsendii varies
from the total darkness of deep caverns or tunnels, to semidarkness
in houses, small caves, and near the entrances of deeper structures.
With regard to Californian populations, Dalquest (1947, p. 24) re-
ported that all retreats of Plecotus that he had examined were dark or
but dimly lighted. In the best lighted roosts the bats could be seen
without the use of a flashlight once the observer’s eyes had become
accustomed to the darkness. Lights were necessary for observation
in the other retreats.
Likewise, humidity seems to be usually of secondary importance in
roost-site selection. Twente (1955b, p. 716) noted an apparent indif-
ference of the big-eared bat to varying degrees of humidity (90 to 21
per cent in hibernating sites). Beer and Richards (1956, p. 34) re-
ported a similar variation (100 to 38 per cent) in the relative humidity
of E’ptesicus hibernating sites.
Temperature appears to be the critical factor. Twente (1955b, p.
706) observed that bats must rest in habitats whose temperatures are
suited to their metabolic needs. Thus, there may be variation in
choice of roost according to season, time of day, weather, sex of bat,
etc. For example, hibernating bats must roost in cool places to keep
metabolism low so that energy reserves will be conserved. During the
feeding season warm roosting sites permit digestion and assimilation
of food to proceed. In general, P. townsendii roosts in warm places
170 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
after having eaten and in cool places when food is scarce. In addition,
it has been postulated that warm sites may be required for the satis-
factory progress of some reproductive processes (pp. 171, 182).
The bat’s perception of the microclimate of its roosting site does
not seem to be especially good. Twente (1955b, p. 714) determined
that P. townsendii apparently locates a suitable roosting spot by a
trial and error system. If the spot first selected is unsuitable the
bat awakens and moves to another place. Eventually optimum con-
ditions may be located. The social tendency of the bats to seek their
Own species increases the probability of most of the individuals
finding suitable sites.
Sociapiuity: P. townsendii seems as a rule not to associate in its
daytime and hibernation roosts with other species of bats, although
scattered individuals of other normally colonial species occasionally
may be present. Often such joint habitation does not actually bring
the bats into close contact, for they may occupy different parts of the
roosting structure or may occupy the same part at different times.
Goldman (field notes) found P. townsendiit hibernating with P.
mexicanus in a cave and in an abandoned mine shaft. At one time or
another Dalquest (1947, pp. 21-23) noted P. townsendii in the same
retreats as Antrozous pallidus, Myotis californicus, M. evotis, M.
thysanodes, M. volans, M. yumanensis, and Tadarida mexicana. Stager
(1939, p. 226) observed large numbers of P. townsendii, Myotis velifer,
and Macrotus californicus, together with smaller numbers of four other
species of bats, in an abandoned mine shaft. In addition to the species
already noted, Pearson, et al. (1952, p. 275) found AZyotis lucifugus,
M. subulatus, and E’ptesicus fuseus roosting with P. townsendit. Two
M. subulatus were actually in a cluster of hibernating Plecotus. Ihave
found numerous scattered dormant individuals of Myotis lucifugus,
M. sodalis, and Pipistrellus subflavus only a few inches from hibernating
clusters of Plecotus townsendii in a West Virginia cave.
Intraspecific sociability in P. townsendii is seasonally variable.
Nursery colonies of females and young are common in summer, but
solitary pregnant females are frequently encountered. Males at this
season are usually, but not always, solitary. Both sexes have been
found together in summer roosts, though usually not clustering to-
gether. Winter aggregations may include a random assortment of
both sexes, or, according to the physical aspect and atmospheric con-
dition of the roost, males and females alike may tend to be solitary.
If there is an average seasonal divergence in roost-site selection by the
sexes, probably the female prefers cooler winter roosts and warmer
spring and summer sites than the male.
Dalquest (1947, p. 22) noted females with newborn young gathered
so closely together that the edges of the cluster appeared to be a solid
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 171
line. The bats normally pack so tightly in the cluster that their
number is usually considerably underestimated in a casual observa-
tion. As shown by Twente (1955b, pp. 707, 714, 723) the function of
the cluster is seasonally variable.
Contrary to the opinion of many authors, the winter cluster func-
tions to protect the bats from heat rather than from cold. The body
temperatures of the clustered bats approach the temperature of the
substrate upon which they are resting, whereas the body temperature
of the solitary bat is more affected by the surrounding air temperature.
Low body temperatures and consequent low metabolic rates are im-
perative to insure conservation of fat reserves through the hibernating
season. Beer and Richards (1956, p. 39) have demonstrated for
Eptesicus that in some circumstances there may be a delicate balance
between length of fasting (hibernating) season and quantity of stored
fat in the bat. Unusually high metabolism in the bat or abnormally
protracted cold weather result in starvation of the bat.
Since temperatures within spring and summer clusters may exceed
the environmental temperatures, heat conservation seems to be the
primary function of the cluster at these seasons. The higher tempera-
tures presumably would aid digestion and assimilation of food.
Twente found that Myotis moved to the cooler parts of caves and
assumed deeper torpidity, as in winter hibernation, when stormy
weather prevented their normal summer foraging flights. Warmer
sites were chosen and higher cluster temperatures prevailed after the
bats had eaten. Pearson, et al. (1952, pp. 303, 311) suggested that
gestation, lactation, and other reproductive processes also might be
facilitated by the elevated temperatures maintained in clusters.
Clustered young, their metabolism possibly accelerated by the higher
temperatures, may grow more rapidly than solitary young.
According to the observations of Pearson, et al. (1952, p. 275) in
central California and Twente (1955b, p. 724) in Oklahoma and
Kansas, nursery colonies of pregnant females begin to form early in
April and increase gradually well into May. The colonies may consist
of individuals from diverse hibernating sites. Varying from a few to
200 individuals, these colonies remain more or less intact until after
the young are weaned in late summer. The bats ordinarily return to
the same sites—buildings, mine tunnels, or caves—year after year.
Porutation: By studying and banding nursery colonies, Pearson,
et al. (1952, p. 314) were able to calculate probable survival rates in
P. townsendii. Although differences in habits of males and females
render it difficult or impossible to determine the sex ratio in the adult
population, the ratio is about 50 : 50 in the young. Only 5.5 per cent
of 470 females examined in nursery colonies were neither pregnant nor
lactating (reproductive failure is more common in young females than
172 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
in adults). Basing their figures on these facts and on recovery of
banded individuals, Pearson, et al., reasoned that a colony of 100 fe-
males should produce about 45 young females in a season. Of this
number, 20 would survive to join the colony as breeding adults the
following season. Assuming an average survival of 80 per cent of these
bats each year after their first and an equal rate of mortality for adults
of all ages, the colony would, as they found through three years of
observations, remain static at about 100 breeding females each season.
Age composition of such a colony would be as in table 6, with the me-
dian age 3.1 and the average age 5.0 years. Figures beyond the 3-year-
old age class are theoretical.
TaBLE 6.—Theoretical age composition of a nursery colony of 100 female Plecotus
townsendii. (Modified from Pearson, et al., 1952, p. 315.)
ACOH NYyCArSe.. wen = sone se 1)2/3,4/]5] 6) 7) 8] 9 j10 {11 12 J13 |14 |15 |16 |17 {18 | 19
Number of individuals-_--__-- ZONLEH1S OWS WS 40 SS 2 [2 ty Py ee Pole a
Pearson, et al. (1952, p. 316) estimated a population density of one
P. townsendii per 310 acres on 62,000-acre Santa Cruz Island off the
coast of California. The island was shared with at least an equal
number of Antrozous pallidus and an undetermined number of Myotis
californicus. Basing their estimate on the spacing of known colonies,
these authors supposed that on the mainland of California the popula-
tion density might be as small as one Plecotus per 419 acres, but
supposed that in actuality each Plecotus probably had available con-
siderably less than 419 acres. This would be especially true if un-
known food habits restrict the hunting of P. townsendit. By doubling
the estimated total of individuals in nursery colonies, Twente (1955a,
p. 387) determined that there might be 300 to 500 P. townsendii in
the gypsum caves of extreme northern Oklahoma and adjacent parts
of Kansas. For the same area he estimated 25,000 to 50,000 Tadarida
brasiliensis, 15,000 to 20,000 Myotis velifer, and 200 to 400 Antrozous
pallidus. No estimate was made for H’ptesicus fuscus and Pipistrellus
subflavus which were present in smaller numbers.
How populations of P. townsendii are limited is not clear. Probably
the same factors do not operate throughout the bat’s range. Twente
(1955a, p. 388) calculated that the yearly mortality could not exceed
33.3 per cent in animals with a reproductive potential of only one
young per year if the population was to maintain a constant level.
On this basis the daily population decrease could not be more than
1.1 per thousand. Twente suggested that in Kansas and Oklahoma
the observed predation on bats by rat snakes, raccoons, hawks, owls,
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 173
and other animals might account for such a loss and thus would be
the primary limiting factor. Rice (1957, p. 30) postulated that
predation by rat and corn snakes, opossums, owls, and cockroaches
was the most important mortality factor among populations of
Myotis austroriparius in Florida.
The possibility of antisocial tendencies and consequent need of
some degree of privacy from other species of bats might be a limiting
factor for P. townsendii where roosting places are not abundant.
Pearson, et al. (1952, p. 317) believed it most likely that the popula-
tion level of this species in California depended upon the number
of suitable winter roosting sites and the number of summer roosting
sites surrounded by adequate feeding territory. Their data indicated
that disease, predation, and amount of food and water probably did
not limit the Californian populations. They observed that colonies
remained static in size, year after year, and believed that a species
population increase might depend on establishment of new nursery
colonies.
How new nursery colonies become established is not known.
Pearson, et al. (1952, p. 317) determined that when a satisfactory
nursery site becomes available near an already-established colony,
the colony does not divide to make use of both sites, but uses either
one or the other, or alternates between the two. Consequently, they
thought, for a new nursery colony to become established, some
females either through chance, faulty navigation, or some inner
drive must find a suitable roosting place outside of the range of an
existing colony. Furthermore, they believed it necessary for several
females to arrive at this place almost simultaneously if gestation
were to proceed normally, since females are gregarious and may
depend upon clustering to keep their body temperatures high.
These hypotheses might serve to explain the evident slowness of
Plecotus in reoccupying apparently suitable territory to the north
of their present geographic range since the retreat of the Wisconsin
glaciers.
PARASITES AND DISEASE: No ticks, lice, fleas, or bedbugs have
been reported on P. townsendit, and this bat is not particularly noted
for heavy infestations of other ectoparasites.
Winged parasitic flies of the family Streblidae (Zrichobius cory-
norhini Cockerell and Trichobius quadrisetosus Kessel) appear to be
encountered most often. I have noted flies of this family on specimens
of Plecotus from Veracruz and West Virginia. Others have reported
them as follows: Sprague (1938, p. 500) an infestation in Oklahoma,
Wilson (1946, p. 86) in West Virginia, Dalquest (1947, p. 30) no
more than one per bat in California, Krutzsch (1955, p. 458) up to
three or four per bat on fur and membranes of specimens from “‘western
7A: PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM You. 110
North America,” and Smith (1934, p. 63) up to eight or ten per bat,
mostly in the ears, on specimens from Kansas and Oklahoma.
Wingless parasitic flies of the family Nycteribiidae (Baszlia antrozot
Townsend and Basilia corynorhini Ferris) (Stiles and Nolan, 1931,
p. 715) seem to be generally less common on P. townsendiz, although
Dalquest (1947, p. 30) found up to five per bat in California and
Krutzsch (1955, p. 458) up to two or three per bat in ‘‘western North
America.”’
Sprague (1938, p. 500) reported mites on specimens from Oklahoma,
and Krutzsch (1955, p. 458) found up to eight or nine mites of the
genus Ichoronyssus per bat on the membranes of specimens from
‘western North America.”
One of four California specimens of P. townsendii examined by
Mitchell (1956, p. 444) was infected with Trypanosoma vespertilionis.
Twente (1955a, p. 387) discovered a possibly diseased specimen
of P. townsendii in a cavern in Kansas on 31 October. It was a fat
male, and although it had a rectal temperature of 93.9° I. it was
very feeble and was unable to fly. A week later it was found dead.
Foop: Apparently no one has observed P. townsendii engaged in
its normal feeding activity. Little is known of its food habits.
Hamilton (1943, p. 104) reported that all specimens that he had
examined contained only the remains of Lepidoptera. Pearson,
et al. (1952, p. 317) believed that P. townsendii eats moths and other
insects (probably mostly flying insects). In stomachs of P. townsendit
and Myotis velifer hibernating together in an Oklahoma cave, Sprague
(1988, p. 500) found remains of insects and hairs of both species
of bats. Inasmuch as the bats were heavily parasitized with bat
flies (Streblidae), Sprague supposed that the bats might be feeding
on the parasites. Twente (1955b, p. 713) observed no evidence
of feeding among hibernating populations that he studied in Oklahoma
and Kansas.
Pearson, et al. (1952, p. 274) found it difficult to induce captive big-
eared bats to feed themselves. The bats were offered mealworms,
supplemented occasionally by percomorph oil. Most could be taught
in a day or so to accept decapitated mealworms forced into their
mouths. Self-feeding was encouraged by stringing mealworms on
wires along the sides of the cage. Some individuals eventually learned
to eat worms from a dish, although many had to be hand fed through-
out their captivity. As many as 40 mealworms might be taken daily.
The most successful captives were ones that had learned to feed them-
selves and were kept in a cage large enough to permit flight. However,
pregnant individuals, even though eating well, aborted or resorbed
their embryos. The maximum period of survival in captivity was
about six months. Some individuals survived without food when kept
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 5
at a temperature of 45° F. in almost-covered aquaria stocked with
drinking water.
Movements: Cockrum (1956a, p. 51) classified the movements of
bats in three major categories: Diurnal movements (routine daily
movements in quest of food and water), local migrations (irregular
movements from one roost to another without regard for season), and
seasonal migrations (seasonal movement from one roost to another,
perhaps as little as ten miles or less apart). These categories overlap
and are not clearcut. Consequently, some movements are difficult to
classify.
DiurRNAL MOVEMENTS: H. H. T. Jackson (field notes) encountered
P. townsendii in the month of August in a cave at the east side of
Montezuma Well, Arizona. During the day the bats occupied the
dark interior parts of the cave, but late in the afternoon they were to be
found in the partially lighted section near the entrance. At this time
they were unusually wild and the slightest noise or shadow caused
them to retire to the deeper parts of the cave. Twente (1955b, p. 727)
described a similar light-sampling behavior of P. townsendii in a
cavern in Kansas. ‘Toward evening the bats moved from the depths of
the cavern to lateral depressions near the entrance. From these
stations they made periodic sorties to the entrance until nightfall
allowed their departure from the cavern.
Many authors have noted that P. townsendii leaves its daytime
retreat only after darkness has fallen. Dalquest (1947, p. 24) believed
that the species had never been observed in its hunting flight. Pear-
son, et al. (1952, p. 274) stated that it is a relatively late-flying species,
emerging from its roosting structure after dark and not returning
until almost dawn.
On the other hand, Vernon Bailey (field notes) reported that in the
Sundance region of Wyoming:
These are the earliest bats seen flying in the evening, and they seem to come from
various parts or openings in the canyon walls. When they first come out it is
light enough to see their long ears as they fly about. Their flight is rather slow
and they would be easy to shoot... .
Bailey (1930, p. 181) again saw big-eared bats in early evening flight at
Yellowstone National Park, and shot two (1936, p. 387) one evening at
McKenzie Bridge, Oregon, when they circled about at the edge of the
forest. Krutzsch and Heppenstall (1955, p. 127) shot a P. townsendii
in Utah as the bat foraged in the early twilight. Hamilton (1943,
p. 102) watched big-eared bats leave a West Virginia cave during the
late dusk. The cave opening was well above the valley floor, and the
emerging bats first flew yet higher, soaring and circling at a height of
several hundred feet until it was too dark for successful shooting.
Then they descended to within a few feet of the ground.
497256—59 6
176 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
During the hibernating season there is considerable movement of
bats within the roost. Apparently the selection of a suitable spot for
hibernation is a hit or miss proposition. Thus the bats repeatedly
awaken from dormancy and move to other spots until a favorable site
is located. Consequently, a few flying bats are likely to be found in
the roost at any time, although the majority of individuals may be
lethargic (p. 179). To illustrate this, Pearson, et al. (1952, p. 278)
in midwinter marked with chalk the locations of 56 torpid bats in a
California cave. Temperature within the cave was 34°F. Particu-
lar effort was made to avoid disturbing the bats. The following day
there were as before 56 torpid bats in the chamber, but at least 17
had moved to new locations. Records indicate that males are more
active in winter than females.
Loca MIGRATIONS: At all seasons individuals or populations of
P. townsendit may normally alternate between two or more roosts, or
may irregularly seek new roosts. These facts have been emphasized
by the banding of hibernating populations and by the observation of
nursery colonies. Banding operations in West Virginia (504 Plecotus,
Mohr, 1952, p. 7), Kansas (155 Plecotus, Twente, 1955a, p. 380),
and California (1500 Plecotus, Pearson, et al., 1952, p. 274) all indicate
movement of P. townsendii from cave to cave during even the coldest
weather. Much of this movement undoubtedly was precipitated by
the disturbance to the bats when they were banded, or when the band
numbers were read. Twente (1955a, p. 380) found that when thus
disturbed the bats invariably awakened and left the cavern, not to be
seen there again for several days or months, if ever. The banding
data indicated in addition that there was considerable movement
from cave to cave by bats that had not been disturbed by banding.
Apparently these individuals were seeking circumstances more favor-
able for hibernation.
Pearson, et al. (1952, p. 276) described the effect of disturbance on
a nursery colony. One evening, after the adult bats had left the
roost, their 75 young were banded. ‘The adults returned, picked up
their young, and by morning all were settled in an alternate roost 1.3
miles away. How the colony quickly agreed to move and arrived
intact at a distant new roosting place is an intriguing mystery.
SEASONAL MIGRATIONS: There is no evidence of long migrations by
P. townsendu. Among the 1500 banded in California by Pearson,
et al. (1952, p. 275) most that were recaptured were recovered at the
original banding site or not more than 1.5 miles from it. A young
male found dead 20 miles from his birthplace was the most distant
recovery. ‘Twenty-four percent of 504 individuals banded in West
Virginia were recovered in a subsequent season, all near their banding
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY Lhd
sites. For information on dates of movements to and from nursery
and hibernating roosts, see pp. 171, 180, and 183.
Homrine: Only Cockrum (1956a, p. 49) has reported homing experi-
ments with P. townsendii. He secured 54 individuals from a cave in
Arizona in May. These were released at a point 28 miles away.
Three of the bats were recovered at the home cave two days later and
a fourth two months later.
Fuicut: After spending several hours swinging a butterfly net in
a nearly futile attempt to capture P. townsendw confined in a room,
Dalquest (1947, p. 24) concluded that this bat sees well, is a swift
flier, an agile dodger, and possesses an excellent sense for danger.
Hundreds, if not thousands, of sweeps netted but one bat in free
flight.
Not only is P. townsendii adroit at avoiding hand-operated nets,
but some characteristic keeps it from becoming entangled in mist nets
as well. Although these nets are very effective for capturing many
species of bats, those that do not forage near the ground and those
whose flight is slow, cautious, and butterfly-like are seldom taken.
Also, perhaps those with an unusually well developed echo location
apparatus can detect and avoid the nets more readily. Only Baker
(1956, p. 187) has reported taking P. townsendv in a mist net.
The flight of captive big-eared bats has been described in detail by
Grinnell (1918, p. 344) and Dalquest (1947, p.25). In the confinement
of a room, the flight pattern most often was a figure eight, varied with
ovals and circles, extending from floor level to the beamed recesses
of the ceiling. Flight character varied from hovering like a humming-
bird to slow and butterfly-like to swift and swallow-like. Wing-beats,
deep and smooth, often alternated with short glides. In average
flight the head was bent ventrally so that the body formed a smooth
curve from chin to tip of tail. The ears, pointed forward and held
almost parallel to the horizontal plane of the body, were, surprisingly,
scarcely noticeable. The legs were spread apart so that the inter-
femoral membrane was expanded. I have noted that in slow flight
the head is not so depressed and the ears are more conspicuous, as
they are held more nearly perpendicular to the horizontal plane of the
body. On some occasions the flight of P. townsendii may be silent,
with no squeaking, swishing, or fluttering. At other times it is
relatively noisy.
When it alights on a wall or ceiling, P. townsendii swoops up from
below, its wings close, and with great agility it flips over so that its
feet become foremost and almost simultaneously grasp a foothold.
Restine posture: In ordinary sleep the big-eared bat normally
hangs free, suspended only by the feet (see Dalquest, 1947, p. 25, for
a detailed description). Many observers have noted its peculiarity
178 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
of frequently hanging suspended*by only one foot, and Dalquest
(1947, p. 29) has pointed out that the truly lethargic bat clings with
both feet and thumbs and presses its body tightly to the surface of
its roost-site. Among big-eared bats hibernating in the gypsum cav-
erns of Oklahoma and Kansas, Twente (1955b, p. 721) observed a
different posture. The ears were folded back along the neck, the
fingers were spread so that the wings effectively covered the ventral
surface of the body, the tail and interfemoral membrane were bent
down to cover the venter and hind parts of the wings, and the long
body hairs stood out perpendicularly. In this position the bat was
practically enveloped with a layer of dead air, effectively insulating it
from the surrounding warm air of the cavern, and helping it to assume
a body temperature similar to that of the substrate from which it
was suspended. Grinnell and Swarth (1913, p. 380) noted a similar
posture in lethargic big-eared bats in California.
The normal position of the ear in the undisturbed resting bat ap-
pears to be coiled back and down tightly against the side of the neck
like aram’s horn. The posterior portion of the ear is wrinkled, rather
accordion-like, and there is lateral contraction in accomplishing the
spiral shape. The ears can be coiled independently, and sometimes
an individual is seen with one ear erect while the other is coiled. Ap-
parently the tragus always remains erect, regardless of the position
of the ear. Upon superficial examination, when the ear is coiled, the
erect tragus may be mistaken for the ear.
Possibly P. townsendii sometimes adopts the common ear posture
of the resting P. auritus, that is, with the ear folded back against the
side of the neck and chest and partially concealed beneath the folded
wing, rather than coiled against the side of the head and neck (Grin-
nell and Swarth, 1913, p. 380; Howell, 1920, p. 174; Alcorn, 1944, p.
309).
When the bat is not lethargic, the ears are unfurled at the slightest
alarm, and move with increasing vigor as the observer approaches.
The sight of a tightly packed cluster of bats with long ears quivering,
waving, and in constant motion is a memorable one.
Hamilton (1943, p. 102) and Mohr (1933, p. 50) noted that big-
eared bats lapsed into disoriented flight or fell stunned when guns
were discharged near them in caves. These authors presumed that
the auditory apparatus of P. townsendii is more sensitive than that
of bats with smaller ears.
Voice: The voice of P. townsendir is difficult to describe. A high
pitched twittering is commonly heard both in roosts and in captivity.
H. W. Grinnell (1918, p. 344) noted that an individual “protested in
shrill cicada-like notes” when handled. Grinnell and Swarth (1913,
p. 380) described the voice as a “‘grating squeak,”’ and Dalquest (1947,
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 179
p. 29) stated that semi-lethargic individuals were able to “‘hiss’’ when
disturbed. Mohr (1933, p. 50) reported that E. L. Poole made the
following observations on the call of an individual less than a week old:
“Tt has a ventriloquial hollow cuc-cuc-cuc, like a yellow-billed cuckoo;
close at hand a high thin tse-tse-tse, like the song of a blackpoll warbler,
which could be heard synchronized with the other sound.”
HisernaTion: Hibernation in an animal is a state of lethargy in
which body temperature is depressed in correspondence with a low
environmental temperature and in which physiological activity is
proportionally curtailed. Hibernation may be of long or short dura-
tion. Among bats there appears to be no clear distinction between
sleep and hibernation. When the bat rests its temperature approaches
that of its environment. Thus, without regard for season, if the air
temperature of its roosting place is low enough, the bat assumes a
lethargic condition.
However, Twente (1955b, p. 713) found that the body temperature
of bats difficult to awaken and bats easy to awaken may be the same.
He postulated that the degree of lethargy is dependent upon how high
or how low the bat’s body temperature has been during the period of
lethargy. This factor would determine the amount of stored food
that had been catabolized during the period of inactivity. The pri-
mary wastes of this process are carbon dioxide, nitrogenous byprod-
ucts, and water. The observation that Myotis nearly always urinates
when awakened suggested to Twente that a possible factor causing
awakening is the amount of urine in the bladder and the nervous con-
sequences of bladder distension. He proposed that it would be more
appropriate to refer to the bat’s lethargic state in degrees of irritabil-
ity rather than in degrees of lethargy. Thus, bats hibernating in
places that are warm or have fluctuating low temperatures are usually
more irritable than those that have been hibernating in places that
have relatively constant low temperatures. Similarly, bats at the
edges of clusters tend to be more irritable than those in the center,
for they have been members of the cluster the shortest time and have
higher temperatures and a higher rate of metabolism. If the place
that the bat has selected for hibernation is unsuitable, the animal
awakens, probably because a high metabolic rate has made it irritable,
and moves to another place. The bat always awakens and moves
when the temperature of its environment approaches 32° F.
Twente (loc. cit.) found that once the awakening process is initiated,
the bat’s body temperature rises at a constant and rapid rate (about
1.8° F. per minute for P. townsendii) until flight becomes possible for
the animal. Reeder and Cowles (1951, p. 395) determined the thresh-
old of flight to be at a rectal temperature of 73.9° F. in P. townsendia.
Twente’s specimens of this species flew at a rectal temperature of
180 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
75.2° F. but did not fly agily until a temperature of 82° to 86° F. was
reached.
Pearson, et al. (1952, p. 276) found most P. townsendi lethargic at
air temperatures below 62° F. and recorded temperature as low as
28.5° F. near hibernating individuals. Twente (1955b, p. 715) ob-
served an air temperature range of 37.4° to 69.8° F’. where lethargic
big-eared bats were resting. When Dalquest (1947, p. 29) placed
active specimens of P. townsendii in a refrigerator at a temperature of
40° F. all became lethargic within 20 minutes.
Pearson, et al. (1952, p. 277) observed in their studies of P. town-
sendii in California that the bats began to arrive in their hibernating
quarters in late October, reached peak numbers in January, and de-
parted by April. Females arrived earlier and stayed later than males.
Females were usually lethargic both day and night during the coldest
periods, whereas males tended to awaken at night the year around,
even in midwinter. During spring, summer, and fall both sexes were
usually alert day and night and lethargic individuals were uncommon,
especially in September when the males were coming into breeding
condition.
In central California, Pearson, et al. (1952, p. 280) found that some
male P. townsendii apparently did not hibernate. Individuals came
to night roosting places throughout the winter in outside air tempera-
tures ranging from 37° to 57° F. Winter records of females at night
roosts were more irregular but indicated activity on nights when the
outside air temperature ranged between 47° and 57° F. Pearson,
et al., did not determine what food sustained this winter activity.
Although flying insects were probably scarce at this season, these
authors captured adult male bats that lacked stored fat. Elsewhere,
males that they weighed averaged 8.36 grams on 3 February and had
dropped 0.64 grams to 7.72 grams by 2 April. This loss probably rep-
resented the amount of stored fat required to sustain the bats for this
period (temperatures 37° to 50° F.) without intake of additional food.
For further data on roosts, sociability, and movement during hiber-
nation, see pp. 168, 170, and 176.
Repropuction: Unless otherwise noted, all of the following infor-
mation on repreduction in P. townsendii is taken from Pearson, et al.
(1952, pp. 281-314).
Insemination.—The mating season extends from early October to
late February. Copulatory activity is greatest in the winter roosts,
but some, perhaps most, females have mated at least once before they
arrive at the wintering places. Unmated females may be found
throughout September, but spermatozoa are to be found in all after
about the third week of October. Young females (as little as 3 or 4
months old) mate as early as do adult females, but because they pro-
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 181
duce few sperms and because their sex accessories are small, young
males (4 to 9 months old) are almost certainly sterile in their first
breeding season.
At times the males, more or less active throughout the winter, ap-
proach and probably achieve intromission with lethargic females.
The passive state of the females and the absence of a vaginal plug
would permit each female to be mated many times in the course of the
winter. Since all females in the hibernating quarters contain sperma-
tozoa by late October, subsequent copulatory activity on the part of
the males must be directed toward females already inseminated.
It is not known how the male circumvents the female’s interfemoral
membrane, which during lethargy is usually curled tightly over the
abdomen. The only copulation that Pearson, et al., observed took
place on a cave ceiling too high to allow observation of detail. How-
ever, the male embraced the female from behind in the usual manner
of copulating mammals.
Precopulatory activity was observed among captive bats. The
female hung by her feet and was approached from the front by a male.
Twittering, the male proceeded to embrace the female with his wings,
then vigorously rubbed his snout, perhaps making use of his muzzle
glands, over the foreparts and ventral surface of the female. A
strong bat odor was noted.
Sperm storage.—Spermatozoa of bats are viable for surprisingly long
periods. In male P. townsendii they retain their motility for six or
more months after they reach the epididymis. However, it is not
known whether motile spring spermatozoa are capable of fertilizing.
Spermatozoa remained abundant in the uteri of females kept isolated
in cool temperatures for as long as 108 days. Probably in P. town-
sendii, as in other vespertilionid bats, spermatozoa stored over winter
in the female reproductive tract are capable of fertilizing in the spring.
After ovulation, spermatozoa disappear quickly from the uterus.
Ovulation.—In P. townsendii ovulation occurs from February to
April. Maturation of the ovarian follicle and its subsequent ovula-
tion may depend upon the stimulation of copulation, and this stimulus
may be effective even though administered several months before
ovulation. It appears that there is an autumnal and early winter
period during which ovulation normally will not occur. Neither fe-
males that are active in winter nor those that are lethargic in winter
ovulate before spring, and those that are removed from hibernation
and kept at warm temperatures do not ovulate readily. The possi-
bilities of sperm storage in the female and insemination of unreceptive
females while they are lethargic may have permitted the advanced
copulatory period to evolve.
Gestation.—The duration of gestation may depend upon the body
182 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
temperature of the bat and upon whether or not it was lethargic during
a portion of the period. Variation in environmental conditions in
hibernating quarters and nursery roosts thus may have a profound
effect on gestation. The gestation period varied from 56 to 100 days
in the California populations of P. townsendi studied by Pearson,
et al.
Parturition.—The birth process was observed in a captive female.
She hung from the wire top of her cage by widespread hind feet and
thumbs. Her tail was curled upward so that it completed the ‘“in-
verted umbrella” effect and made it quite unlikely that the young
could fall. In fact, not even a drop of blood or fluid reached the cage
floor. This position was maintained all during parturition and for
half an hour afterward. The birth was a breech presentation. With-
in minutes the fluids and afterbirth were consumed by the mother, and
while she licked her membranes and ofispring, the young moved for-
ward, secured a nipple, and attached its feet to the top of the cage.
A single young is the rule in this species, and 49 out of 50 embryos
were found in the right horn of the uterus. After parturition this
horn never returns to its original small size, but remains larger than
the left, about 1.5 to 2 mm. in diameter. This disparity in size may
lead to presumably erroneous reports of fall pregnancies as that of
Bailey (1936, p. 390).
The average date of parturition of a colony varies from year to
year, and there seems to be a considerable variation in the spread of
birth dates in different colonies (19 to 35 days). It is probable that
birth dates extend over a long period in a colony whose females
roosted in diverse places with a variety of environmental temperatures
before they congregated at the nursery colony. There is evidence
also that young females tend to join the nursery colony later in the
spring than do adults, and that they bear their young later in the
season than do adults.
Pearson, et al., estimated birth dates for several hundred western
American P. townsendzi from specimens, field notes, and literature by
reference to graphs relating embryo size and forearm length to age
(figs. 20, 21). The earliest calculated birth date was 19 April in
California, and the latest was 22 July in Arizona. Records for the
Appalachian population indicate a similar breeding season.
Growth of young.—Pearson, et al., described the newborn P. town-
sendit as a grotesque creature, its large ears flopping over its unopened
eyes and the disproportionately large size of its thumbs and hind feet
giving it a spider-like appearance. The following chronology of
growth was set forth:
The average weight of newborn young was 2.4 grams, and the
forearm length averaged 16.6 mm. (there is no significant size varia-
AMERICAN BATS—-HANDLEY 183
=
= Ig
°|. wi
te 23 [6
= 21 “14
ae 12
to me he
= = 15 z
a 2 er
ww 15 ae (e!
ost 4
a
u 9
= fee
pees
St o 5
x
ES: oO
°o
= 3
i
o
=
Ww
—
AGE IN DAYS.
Ficure 20.—Average growth-rate of embryo in Plecotus townsendit pallescens. Measure-
ments in millimeters. (Modified from Pearson, et al., 1952, p. 302.)
tion between sexes until late in development when smaller size of
male becomes apparent). Within a few hours the young one is able
to utter a characteristic sharp, metallic “chirp.”’ The dried umbilical
cord may remain attached for a day or two. Before five days of age
the naked pink body becomes covered with short gray hair. At
seven days the young bat can make the ‘‘squaking” noise of the dis-
turbed adult, and the ears assume the erect position of the adult. A
few days later the eyes open. Up to the age of 16 days (forearm less
than 35 mm.), while the growth curve is approximately linear, the
forearm lengthens 1.2 mm. per day. Forearm length is a reliable
indicator of age up to about three weeks. At four weeks the forearm
is so close to adult length that it can no longer be relied upon. The
young fly at about two and a half to three weeks of age, and at six
weeks some young fly out at night as do the adults. The summer
colonies start to break up in August when the older young are just
over three months old.
Lactation.—In Plecotus there is a single pair of pectoral mammae,
lateral in position. Tiny nipples (less than 0.6 mm. long in fresh
specimens) are characteristic of young and nonparous females, and
once a female has borne young the nipples do not return again to the
tiny category, although they frequently become small again. The
nipples of the young remain tiny through the summer, fall, and
winter of their first year, and begin to enlarge at about the time of
implantation of the embryo. The nipples reach full size (up to about
3 mm. in length) at the end of pregnancy or shortly thereafter.
184 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
ADULT ¢
42 a eeae=— os ADULT &
| FLYING
| ‘FLUT TERING
leves OPEN
| EARS UP
t GRAY: FUZZ
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42
AGE IN DAYS
Figure 21.—Average growth-rate of forearm in Plecotus townsendii pallescens. Measure-
ments in millimeters. (Modified from Pearson, et al., 1952, p. 313.)
The young probably nurse with their heads hanging down, and
most nursing must occur during the day, for from the time that they
are born or within a day or two of their birth, the young bats are left
in the roost at night while the adults go out to feed. Banding has
proved that each female bat unerringly selects her own young from
amongst the many in the cluster when she returns to the nursery
from her foraging flight.
The young bats cling to anything that comes into their grasp, and
it is difficult to remove them from their mother. A disturbed mother
may sometimes be seen flying with a young-one dangling from a
nipple, but usually the young bat clings to its mother’s fur with well-
clawed thumbs and feet, as well as to the nipple with its mouth.
Adults may fly with attached volant young weighing as much as six
grams—about two-thirds of the adult’s weight.
It is difficult to tell when lactation ceases, but it appears that
females nurse their young for about two months. By that time the
young are as large as their mothers and are skillful fliers.
Mott: The young big-eared bat molts from its juvenile pelage to
adult pelage at about the time that it reaches adult body size, be-
tween the ages of one and two months. One collected on 7 August
at Burkes Garden, Va. (USNM 157075), was beginning the molt on
chest and belly. Three collected on Sand Creek, Wyo. (USNM), on
24 August, had barely begun to molt.
Adults have a single complete molt annually, most commonly in
August. Possibly the molt normally occurs earlier in males than in
females. New hairs usually appear at almost the same time on all
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 185
parts of the body. Short, prostrate, new hairs are found on some
individuals as early as June (MVZ 103184, o&, San Luis Obispo
County, Calif., 24 June) or July (USNM 250084, o, Fallon, Nev.,
7 July). Specimens from Evergreen, Calif. (MVZ 71619, o, 2 Au-
gust), Huachuca Mountains, Ariz. (UI 4674, o', 7 August, and UI
1425, 9, 15 August), and Vidal, Calif. (LSU 1121, 9, 29 August)
were molting when captured. Six of seven females (USNM) taken
on 24 August along Sand Creek, Wyo., were molting. Of five speci-
mens (USNM) collected on 24 August at Las Cruces, N. Mex., one
male had completed the molt; one female had completed the molt on
the dorsum, but was still molting on the belly; two females were
molting on all parts of the body; and one male apparently had not
begun to molt.
Seme of the summer specimens from New Mexico and southern
California have a peculiar, short, woolly, relatively sparse pelage,
possibly due to early shedding of guard hairs. The same condition
has been observed in some specimens of P. mexicanus.
Plecotus townse ndii australis Handley
Plecotus (Corinorhinus) townsendi J. A. Allen, 1890, p. 176.
Corynorhinus macrotis pallescens Miller, 1897, p. 52. (Part.)
Corynorhinus megalotis mexicanus G. M. Allen, 1916, p. 347. (Part.)
Corynorhinus rafinesquit mexicanus Miller, 1924, p. 83. (Part.)
Plecotus rafinesquizt mexicanus Dalquest, 1953, p. 64. (Part.)
Corynorhinus townsendii australis Handley, 1955c, p. 147.
Hoiotypge: USNM 297265; adult female in alcohol, skull removed;
collected 20 December 1952 by Aurelio Maélaga Alba; 2 miles west of
Jacala, 5,500 feet, Hidalgo, Mexico; collector’s No. 1053.
Distrispution: Arid interior mountain ranges of central and north-
ern Mexico (fig. 24). North to San Juan, Durango, and near Hacienda
La Mariposa, Coahuila. East to near Hacienda La Mariposa and
near Bella Unién, Coahuila; Presa de Guadalupe, San Luis Potosi; near
Jacala and near Yoltepec, Hidalgo; Lago Texcoco, México; and
Oaxaca, Oaxaca. South to Oaxaca, Oaxaca; Cuernavaca, Morelos;
and San Andrés, Jalisco. West to San Andrés, Jalisco; Sierra de Val-
paraiso, Zacatecas; and San Juan, Durango. Zonal distribution:
Upper Sonoran and upper portion of Lower Sonoran. Altitudinal
distribution: 1,800 to 9,500 feet. Most collecting stations are between
4,000 and 7,000 feet.
Description: Adult coloration: Hair of upperparts between Benzo
Brown and Fuscous at base; tips brighter brown, burnished with dark
brown; mass effect between Russet and Cinnamon-Brown; hair bases
sharply differentiated from tips. Hair of underparts Natal Brown at
base; tips about Light Pinkish Cinnamon on belly, somewhat darker
on throat.
186 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
V
Ks
©
aR
NTT
q :
Hin
, Seeenas)
Ficure 22.—Distribution of Plecotus townsendii Cooper (western section): 1, P. t. pal-
lescens; 2, P. t. townsendii. Solid symbols, specimens examined; open symbols, other
records; encircled symbols, type localities. Cross-hatching indicates known areas of
intergradation between subspecies (between pallescens and townsendit in California,
Nevada, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and British Columbia; between pallescens and
ingens in northern Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas; and between pallescens and australis
in western Texas, Chihuahua, and Coahuila).
Size averages medium for the subgenus; forearm averages relatively
long. Rostrum averages relatively long, dorsolaterally inflated, and
usually not particularly depressed; anterior nares relatively large and
usually rounded posteriorly (dorsal view). First upper incisor nor-
mally without secondary cusp; upper canine averages less robust than
in northern populations; anterointernal cingular cusp of P* frequently
present. :
MEASUREMENTs: See tables 10, 16.
AMERICAN BATS—-HANDLEY 187
Wn a Se ee:
X
oe ne
-——
Figure 23.—Distribution of Plecotus townsend1i Cooper (eastern section): 1, P. t. ingens;
2, P. t. virginianus. Solid symbols, specimens examined; open symbols, other records;
encircled symbols, type localities. Cross-hatching indicates known areas of intergrada-
tion between subspecies ingens and pallescens.
Comparisons: P. t. australis is most similar to P. t. pallescens, but
averages darker, browner, and less cinnamon dorsally. P. t. australis
averages larger in most cranial dimensions than Arizonan P. t. pal-
lescens, but can be scarcely distinguished cranially from other popula-
tions of P. t. pallescens.
For comparison with P. mexicanus, see account of that species.
Remarks: Mexican populations of P. townsendii are relatively uni-
form in coloration and cranial characters despite the wide range of
latitude and elevation inhabited. The greatest divergence noted is in
specimens from San Andrés, Jalisco, in which the rostrum is unusually
188 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
i
SHTsiaaiy
Ficure 24.—Distribution of Plecotus townsendii Cooper (southern section): 1, P. t. australis;
2, P. t. ingens; 3, P. t. pallescens. Solid symbols, specimens examined; open symbols,
other records; encircled symbols, type localities. Cross-hatching indicates known areas
of intergradation between subspecies (between pallescens and ingens in northern Texas,
Oklahoma, and Kansas; between pallescens and australis in western Texas, Chihuahua,
and Coahuila).
broad and inflated. Indeed, the whole skull is broad (reflected in
zygomatic breadth, breadth of brain case, etc.) in those specimens.
P. t. australis intergrades with P. t. pallescens. Samples from south-
ern Coahuila have the coloration of P. ¢. australis. 'Two specimens
from near San Buenaventura in central Coahuila resemble P. ¢. pal-
lescens, whereas one from the Chisos Mountains, Texas, is very similar
to P. t. australis. Other specimens from the Big Bend region of Texas
and Chihuahua are, on the average, sufficiently similar to P. t. palles-
cens to be identified as that subspecies, and central and southeastern
New Mexican specimens are essentially identical with samples of
typical P. t. pallescens (northern and central Arizona). Apparently
AMERICAN BATS—-HANDLEY 189
intergradation between these two races of P. townsendw occurs in
northern Coahuila and western Texas.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED.—A total of 58 from the following locali-
ties:
MEXICO: Coaunuita: 1 mile south and 4 miles west of Bella Unién, 7,000 feet,
3s (KU); 4 miles west of Hacienda La Mariposa, 2,300 feet, 1s (KU); one-half
mile north of Muralla, 4,500 feet, 19bs (IU); 9 miles west and 4 miles south of
San Buenaventura, 2,000 feet, 8s (KU); Sierra Guadalupe, 7,800 feet, 10 miles
south and 5 miles west of General Cepeda, Is (KU). Duranao: San Juan, 3,800
feet, 12 miles west of Lerdo, 2s (UMMZ). Guanasvato: Santa Rosa [9,500 feet],
7a (USNM). Guanasuato?: Charcas, 5a (USNM). Hrpauco: Grutas Xoxafi,
6.6 miles southeast of Yoltepec [= Yolotepec?, 6,600 feet], 1s (KU); 2 miles west
of Jacala, 5,500 feet, 3a (USNM); Rfo Tasquillo (Rio de Tula), 5,200 feet, 16
miles east [=12 miles south-southeast?] of Zimapdn, ls (TCWC). Jauisco: San
Andrés [4,900 feet], 10 miles west of Magdalena, 3s (UMMZ); San Pedro, Guadala-
jara, ls (AMNH). Mégxico: Convento de Acolman, 9 miles north of México,
Distrito Federal, 1s (IB); Lago Texcoco, 7,500 feet, la (USNM). Moretos:
Cuernavaca [4,900 feet], 1a (USNM). Oaxaca: Oaxaca [Motne Albdn, 6,500 feet,
3 miles southwest of Oaxaca], la (USNM). San Luts Porosf: Bledos [6,200 feet],
Is (LSU)1; Presa de Guadalupe [4,000 feet] Is (LSU). Zacarncas: Sierra de Val-
paraiso [13 miles west of Valparaiso, 8,200 feet], Is (USNM). ‘‘Merxico’’: No
exact locality, 1b (USNM).
ADDITIONAL RECORDS: The following records probably refer to this
form: ‘
MEXICO: Distrito FEDERAL: Desierto de los Leones [measurements taken
by Villa in 1958, according to my instructions, agree fairly well with those of
P. t. australis] (Villa R., 1953, p. 340). San Luis Potosf; Hacienda La Parada
[6,000 feet] (Miller, 1897, p. 53).
Plecotus townsendii ingens Handley
Corynorhinus rafinesquet rafinesquet Sealander, 1951, p. 465.
Corynorhinus townsendit ingens Handley, 1955c, p. 148.
Houotryrpe: USNM 296767; adult male, skin and skull; collected
4 December 1950 by John A. Sealander; Hewlitt Cave, 12 miles west
of Fayetteville, Washington County, Ark; collector’s No. 50-14.
DistripuTion: Ozark Highlands in northwestern Arkansas and
southwestern Missouri (fig. 23); possibly also extreme eastern Okla-
homa. North to Stone County, Missouri. South to Washington
County, Ark. Zonal distribution, Upper Austral. Altitudinal dis-
tribution, approximately 1,000 to 1,500 feet. ‘
Description: Adult coloration: Mass effect of upperparts be-
tween Hazel and Mars Brown; hair bases Fuscous. Hair of under-
parts between Light Vinaceous-Cinnamon and Light Pinkish Cinna-
mon distally, the bases, except those bordering membranes, Fuscous;
bases of border hairs same as tips. Distinction between bases and
tips of hairs fairly sharp, on both dorsum and underparts.
190 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Size averages large; forearm averages relatively long; skull of
heavy construction; rostrum relatively long, inflated, and not de-
pressed; anterior nares average relatively large and rounded in
posterior outline (dorsal view). First upper incisor usually with at
least a trace of a secondary cusp; anterointernal cingular cusp of
P* absent; molariform teeth robust.
MEASUREMENTS: See tables 10, 16.
Comparisons: Bats of the race P. t. ingens are the most reddish
and the largest of P. townsendii. From P. t. pallescens, the only
geographically adjacent race of this species, ingens is distinguished
by darker, more orange or reddish coloration, average larger size,
relatively larger auditory bullae, more inflated rostrum, relatively
more robust molariform teeth, and more frequent development of a
secondary cusp on the first upper incisor.
For comparison with P. ¢. virginianus see account of that sub-
species (p. 202).
Remarks: The Ozark form is similar to both P. t. virginianus to
the eastward and P. t. pallescens to the westward. Specimens of
P. t. pallescens from western Oklahoma and south-central Kansas
approach P. ¢. ingens in size and coloration, although they are more
like typical P. t. pallescens.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED: A total of 18 from the following U.S.
localities:
ArKANsas: Washington County: Basset Cave, near Hicks, ls (UAZ); Devil’s
Icebox, Devil’s Den State Park, 25 miles southwest of Fayetteville, 2s (CNHM),
9s (UAZ), Is (USNM), 1s (GF); Hewlitt Cave, 12 miles west of Fayetteville,
2s (UAZ), 1s (USNM). Missouri: Stone County: No exact locality, la
(AMNH).
Plecotus townsendii pallescens Miller
Synotus macrotis H. Allen, 1864, p. 68. (Part.)
Synotus townsendi H. Allen, 1864, p. 65.
Clorynorhinus] macrotis H. Allen, 1865, p. 174. (Part.)
Clorynorhinus] townsendi H. Allen, 1865, p. 175.
Corynorhinus macrotis pallescens Miller, 1897, p. 52.
Corynorhinus macrotis intermedius H. W. Grinnell, 1914, p. 320. (Part.)
Corynorhinus megalotis megalotis G. M. Allen, 1916, p. 338. (Part.)
Corynorhinus megalotis pallescens G. M. Allen, 1916, p. 341.
Corynorhinus rafinesquii pallescens H. W. Grinnell, 1918, p. 340.
Plecotus rafinesquii pallescens Blair, 1952, p. 96.
Corynorhinus tlownsendii] pallescens Handley, 1955e, p. 147.
Hototrypr: USNM (Biol. Surv. Coll.) 66534; adult female, skin
and skull (crushed); collected 3 August 1894 by A. K. Fisher; Keam
Canyon, Navajo County, Ariz.; collector’s No. 1715.
DistripuTIon: Western United States, northwestern Mexico,
and southwestern Canada, including parts of the Great Plains, Rocky
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 191
Mountains, Great Basin, Mohave and Colorado Deserts, ete., but
excluding the northwestern coast region (fig. 22). North to Stanley
and Harding Counties, S. Dak.; Powder River and Yellowstone
Counties, Mont.; Yellowstone National Park, Wyo.; Riske Creek
and Williams River, British Columbia. West to Riske Creek and
Williams River, British Columbia; Okanogan and Yakima Counties,
Wash.; Harney County, Oreg.; Siskiyou, Tehama, Placer, Tulare,
and Kern Counties, Calif., and the coast and Channel Islands of
California south of Point Conception. South to San Diego and
Imperial Counties, Calif.; northern Baja California, northern Sonora,
and northern Chihuahua, Mexico; Dona Ana County, N. Mex.;
Culberson, Presidio, Brewster, Val Verde, and Edwards Counties,
Tex. East to Val Verde and Edwards Counties, Tex.; Eddy County,
N. Mex.; Cimarron County, Okla.; El Paso, Boulder, and Larimer
Counties, Colo.; Custer and Stanley Counties, S. Dak. An appar-
ently isolated population inhabits the gypsum cave region in south-
central Kansas, central Oklahoma, and north-central Texas (speci-
mens from Barber and Comanche Counties, Kans., south to Garza
County, Tex. Zonal distribution: Most numerous in Upper Sonoran
and Transition zones, but also occurs at the upper edge of the Lower
Sonoran and the lower edge of the Canadian. Altitudinal distribu-
tion: Sea level (possibly below sea level in southern California) to
9,600 feet.
Description: Adult coloration: Mass effect of upperparts averages
between Sayal Brown and Cinnamon; hair bases Light Cinnamon-
Drab to Benzo Brown. Hair bases of underparts average between
Fawn Color and Benzo Brown; tips between Light Pinkish Cinnamon
and Pinkish Buff. Distinction between bases and tips of hairs usually
everywhere slight. Immature coloration: Mass effect of upperparts
between Drab and Cinnamon-Drab; hair bases slightly grayer. Hair
tips of underparts “dirty” white; bases Benzo Brown to Light Mouse
Gray.
Size averages medium for the subgenus; forearm averages relatively
long; skull relatively light in construction; rostrum averages relatively
long, not particularly depressed, and not inflated; anterior nares
average relatively small and angular in posterior outline (dorsal view).
Canine relatively strong; secondary cusp on I! usually absent;
anterointernal cingular cusp of P* frequent.
MEASUREMENTS: See tables 11, 17.
Comparisons: In coloration of fur, membranes, and ears P. t.
pallescens is the palest and most yellowish known population of the
species.
For comparison with related subspecies see accounts of P. ft.
australis (p. 187), P. ¢. ingens (p. 190), and P. t. townsendii (p. 198).
497256—59 7
192 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Remarks: There are four centers of saturate coloration in P.
townsendii: (1) the central Appalachians; (2) the Ozark Plateau;
(3) the Pacific Northwest; and (4) to a lesser degree, north-central
Mexico. Between the three latter centers is a pale-colored population
(P. t. pallescens) which exhibits maximum pallor and yellowness in the
area extending from southeastern California and central Arizona
northeastward to Wyoming, southeastern Montana and southwestern
South Dakota. The extreme in pallor is found in the northeastern
and southwestern parts of this belt. ‘The very palest specimens that
I have seen come from southeastern California. Southward, eastward,
and westward from the pallid belt there is a gradual and progressive
darkening of pelage toward the saturate centers (fig. 22).
Populations inhabiting the northern flanks of the Sierra Madre
Occidental in northern Sonora and adjacent parts of Arizona are
somewhat darker than populations of central and northern Arizona,
but are much paler than P. mexicanus which is at the northwestern
limit of its range in the same region. New Mexican specimens are
but slightly darker and less yellow than the typical coloration of
pallescens. Specimens from Oklahoma and Kansas are clearly
intermediate between pallescens and the Ozark form, there being
considerable variation in color. The series as a whole, however, is
nearer pallescens. Most Texas (Big Bend) specimens, while not
appreciably darker, are much less yellowish than typical pallescens.
One specimen is darker and resembles more southerly populations
called P. t. australis.
Proceeding westward from the pallid belt, increasing darkness of
coloration is encountered as the range of the dark-colored north-
western coast population of P. townsendii is approached. The zone of
intergradation between pale-colored and dark-colored populations is
broad and includes the coast region of northern and central California;
much of the remainder of California east of the Coast Range, but
excepting the southern deserts; northwestern Nevada; Idaho; eastern
Oregon; eastern Washington; and south-central British Columbia.
Within this zone there is considerable individual variation in
dorsal coloration, shades of yellowish brown and grayish brown being
most common, but reddish brown individuals also occurring. Tone is
very variable throughout the zone, the range in some samples almost
bridging the gap between the pale and dark extremes of the north-
western coast and the pallid belt.
Various authors (among them, H. Grinnell, 1914, p. 320; Whitlow
and Hall, 1933, p. 245; Hall, 1946, p. 160; and Dalquest, 1947, p. 20)
have regarded the populations of this region as being subspecifically
distinct from townsendiz and pallescens. The appropriate name,
“intermedius” H. W. Grinnell, is available for this population.
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 193
Dalquest (1947, p. 20) suggested that this intergrading population
probably developed intermediate characters in response to the nature
of its environment—intermediate between the humid, forested coast
and the arid, treeless deserts, and further postulated that genetic
intergradation was not necessarily implied. If this were not an
intergrading population I would expect to find constant adaptive
characters developed in some portion of its geographic range. How-
ever, in examining specimens from all portions of the range assigned to
‘“Ontermedius,” I have failed to find such a condition.
A series of 25 specimens from Mission San Jose, Alameda County,
Calif., when arranged in order from pale to dark, quite effectively
bridges the color gap between pallescens and townsendii; the average
is nearest townsendiz. Among 14 specimens from Tulare County,
Calif., are three as pale as pallescens, two as dark as townsendii (al-
though more reddish), and nine that are intermediate; the average is
nearest pallescens. In a series of 16 specimens from Pyramid Lake,
Nev., the palest individuals are indistinguishable from typical palles-
cens, while the darkest, without reservation, could be called townsendii;
the average is nearest pallescens. Six of seven from Malheur County,
Oreg., are indistinguishable from typical pallescens, while one is inter-
mediate but nearer pallescens. In a series of three specimens from
Boulder Cave, Kittitas County, Wash., one is as dark as typical
townsendti, while the others are somewhat paler, but nevertheless
nearer townsendit. Whitlow and Hall (1933, p. 246) regarded a large
series from the Pocatello Region of Idaho as intermediate.
Similarly, there is intergradation between pale-colored and dark-
colored populations in cranial characteristics. This is best seen in the
relative stoutness of the rostrum (normally stout in dark-colored
northwestern coast populations, normally less stout in pale-colored
interior populations). Within the zone of intergradation, stoutness
of the rostrum can not be correlated with coloration: Some pale-
colored individuals have the rostrum very stout; some dark-colored
individuals have the rostrum rather frail.
From the specimens and information available to me, it does not
appear that there is a population with constant morphological char-
acters that could justifiably bear the name ‘‘intermedius.”” The fact
that intergradation between P. t. townsendit and P. t. pallescens occurs
over an extensive geographic area does not make the application of
the name “intermedius” to the intermediate population more valid.
The ideal in mammalian systematics is to avoid application of special
names to geographically and genetically intermediate populations.
The use of the name ‘‘intermedius”’ is clearly in violation of this prin-
ciple, and the name is best relegated to synonymy.
194 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
SPECIMENS EXAMINED: A total of 313, from the following localities:
MEXICO: Cuinvuaunua: Tinaja de Ponce, 2,600 feet, Sierra de Ponce, 12 miles
southwest of Santa Helena, 16as (USNM). Sonora: Santa Maria Mine, El
Tigre Mts., 3a (UMMZ); Pilares, la (UMMZ).
UNITED STATES: Catirornia: Imperial County: Potholes, la (USNM); 6
miles north of Potholes, la (MCZ). Inyo County: Lone Pine, Alabama Hills,
4as (MCZ); Owen’s Lake, la (USNM); Owen’s Valley, 1a (USNM). Riverside
County: 2 miles west of Red Mountain Lookout, 2s (STPM), 2s (USNM); River-
side Mts., 2s (LSU). San Bernardino County: ‘‘Manvel” or “Marvel,” la
(USNM); Eagle Pass, 12 miles southwest of Needles, 1s (LSU); Oro Grande, 2s
(USNM); Vidal (Alice Mine), 4a (USNM); 6 miles south of Vidal, 1s (LSU).
San Diego County: Dulzura, la (USNM); El Monte Oaks Park, la (CNHM);
Pine Valley, la (USNM); Vallecito Stage Station, Is (CNHM). Shasta County:
Fort Creek, la (USNM). Siskiyou County: Lava Cave, 5 miles southwest of
Tule Lake, ls (USNM). Tulare County: 4 miles southeast of Porterville, 550
feet, 10s (AMNH); 10 miles east of Porterville, ls (AMNH); 4 miles east-south-
east of White River, 1,700 feet, 38s (AMNH). Orecon: Malheur County: 15
miles south-southwest of Carol, 17as (USNM); Malheur Cave, 20 miles east of
Malheur Lake, 1s (USNM). Wasuineton: Okanogan County: Okanogan High-
lands, 15 miles east of Tonasket, ls (MCZ). Ipano: Bannock County: Portneuf
River, 3 miles northwest of Inkom, lbs (USNM); Chinks Peak, 1.5 miles southeast
of Pocatello, lbs (USNM). Butte County: Craters of the Moon National Monu-
ment, Is (USNM). Nevapa: Churchill County: Fallon, is (USNM). Mineral
County: 1 mile northwest of Rawhide, 1s (UI). Washoe County: Sutcliffe, 3,700
feet, ls (AMNH); The Needles (The Pinnacles), 3,900 feet, north end of Pyramid
Lake, 35as (USNM). Utanw: Cache County: Logan Canyon, 15 miles above
Logan, la (MCZ), 6a (USNM). No eract locality: la (USNM). Arizona:
Cochise County: Chiricahua Mts., la (USNM); Fort Huachuca, 3a (USNM); 8
miles west of Fort Huachuca, 2s (UI); 11 miles south of Fort Huachuca, Is (UI);
Ash Canyon, 19 miles south of Fort Huachuca, 1s (UI); Carr Canyon, 7,200 feet,
Huachuca Mts., 4a (MCZ), 3s (UI); Miller Canyon, Huachuca Mts., 3a (MCZ);
Montezuma Canyon, 5,300 feet, Huachuca Mts., 4a (MCZ); Ramsey Canyon,
Huachuca Mts., 2a (MCZ); Huachuca Mts., ls (MCZ). Graham County: Ash
Creek, 4,200 feet, Graham Mts. (Pinalino Mts.), ls (USNM). Maricopa County:
Roosevelt [Bumblebee Creek, below Roosevelt Dam], 2,300 feet, 1s (USNM);
Christmas Mine, 3,000 feet, 5 miles southwest of Roosevelt, ls (USNM). Mohave
County: Oatman, 6as (MCZ); Rampart Cave, 2 miles southeast of Pierce’s Ferry,
Hoover Dam National Recreational Area, ls (USNM). Navajo County: Keam
Canyon, ls (USNM). Pima County: 2 miles northeast of Arivaca, 4,000 feet,
1ls (AMNH); Las Guijas Mts., north slope, 7 miles north-northwest of Arivaca,
5s (AMNH); Las Guijas, about 10 miles north-northwest of Arivaca, la (USNM);
Santa Catalina Mts., 3a (AMNH); Colossal Cave, 28 miles southeast of Tucson,
2s (USNM). Pinal County: No exact locality, ls (AMNH). Santa Cruz County:
Oro Blanco Mts., 4,600 feet, 12a (MCZ); Patagonia Mts., 3a (MCZ); McCleary’s
Ranch, Santa Rita Mts., ls (USNM). Yavapai County: Camp Verde, 3,200 feet,
Is (USNM), Is (AMNH); Montezuma Well, 3,500 feet, 6as (USNM); Prescott,
1s (AMNH); Turkey Creek [east slope of Bradshaw Mts., 7 miles northeast of
Crown King], 3,400 feet, Is (USNM). New Mexico: Dona Ana County: San
Andreas Mts., 5,600 feet, 35 miles northeast of Las Cruces, 5s (USNM). Eddy
County: Carlsbad, 1s (USNM); McKitterick Cave, 20 miles west of Carlsbad,
1s (USNM); Carlsbad Caverns, 4s (CC). Socorro County: Socorro, Is (USNM).
Texas: Brewster County: West slope of Emory Peak, 7,100 feet, Chisos Mts., 4s
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 195
(UMMZ); Kibbe Spring, 5,700 feet, Chisos Mts., 1s (CNHM); Pine Canyon,
4,700 feet, Chisos Mts., 1s (UMMZ); Johnson Ranch, la (USNM); Viviani
Mines, Mariscal Mts., Is (TSDH). Garza County: Post, 1s (TT). Val Verde
County: East Painted Cave, northwest of Del Rio, la (USNM); Langtry, 1a
(USNM). Oxtanoma: Comanche County: Wichita Mountains National Wildlife
Refuge, 3s (USNM). Woods County: Alva, 1a (USNM); no exact locality, 2b
(MCZ). Woodward County: Alabaster Cave, 2s (CNHM); 6 miles southwest of
Freedom, la (USNM). Kansas: Barber County: Sun City, 2s (USNM). Wro-
MING: Big Horn County: 25 miles northeast of Greybull, 3a (AMNH). Crook
County: Sand Creek, 3,750 feet, Black Hills, 10s (USNM). Yellowstone National
Park: Devil’s Kitchen, Mammoth Hot Springs, 6as (USNM). Montana: Powder
River County: Moorhead, 24s (USNM). Yellowstone County: 5 miles west of
Billings, la (CNHM). Soutra Daxora: Custer County: Hell Canyon, 13 miles
west of Custer, 7s (USN M); 18 miles southwest of Custer, 1s (USNM). Penning-
ton County: Mouth of Spring Creek, Cheyenne River, 3s (AMNH). County un-
certain: Crowfeet [=Crow Peak, Lawrence County?], Black Hills, 7a (AMNH).
ADDITIONAL RECORDS: The following records probably refer to this
form:
MEXICO: Basa Canirornia: No exact locality (Pearson, et al., 1952, p. 273).
CuIHUAHUA: Casas Grandes (Mdlaga, 1953, in litt.). Sonora: Sdric (Burt,
1938, p. 26).
UNITED STATES: Caurrornia: El Dorado County: No exact locality (Taylor,
1919, p. 86). Imperial County: Palo Verde (H. W. Grinnell, 1918, p. 348). Inyo
County: Mountain Springs Canyon, 5,500 feet, Argus Mts. (Dalquest, 1947, p. 19);
4.5 miles southwest of Bishop, 5,200 feet, and 4 miles south-southeast of Bishop,
4,700 feet (Dalquest, 1947, p. 19). Kern County: Old Fort Tejon, near Lebec
(Dalquest and Ramage, 1946, p. 62); Red Rock Canyon (Dalquest, 1947, p. 19);
Weldon (Dalquest, 1947, p. 20). Lassen County: Near Wendel (Dalquest, 1947,
p. 20). Los Angeles County: Johnson’s Harbor, Santa Catalina Island (H. W.
Grinnell, 1914, p. 320). Placer County: Auburn, 1,300 feet (H. W. Grinnell, 1914,
p. 320); Pioneer Cave (H. W. Grinnell, 1914, p. 320). Riverside County: Hemet
Peak, 6,500 feet, San Jacinto Mts., 2 miles northeast of Kenworthy (Grinnell and
Swarth, 1913, p. 379); near Whitewater (H. W. Grinnell, 1918, p. 343). San
Bernardino County: 5 miles southwest of Ivanpah, 4,500 feet (Dalquest, 1947, p.
19); Horse Spring, 2,700 feet, Kingston Range (Dalquest, 1947, p. 19); Mitchell’s
(Johnson, et al., 1948, p. 343). San Diego County: One-half mile west of Banner
(Frum, 1954, in litt.); Excondido (Dalquest, 1947, p. 19); Julian (H. W. Grinnell,
1918, p. 343); Oak Grove (Frum, 1954, in litt.); San Diego (Stephens, 1906, p.
265); Suncrest (Mitchell, 1956, p. 444); Vallecito (H. W. Grinnell, 1918, p. 348);
1.5 miles northwest of Vallecito (Dalquest, 1947, p. 19). Santa Barbara County:
Santa Cruz Island (Pearson, 1951, p. 366). Shasta County: Old Station, 4,300
feet (Pearson, et al., 1952, p. 277). Siskiyou County: Lava Beds National Monu-
ment, 4,800 feet (Pearson, et al., 1952, p. 278). Tehama County: Mouth of Battle
Creek, near Bloody Island, 350 feet (Dalquest, 1947, p. 20). Ormcon: Harney
County: Roaring Springs Cave, 80 miles south of Burns (Cressman and Reed, 1938,
p. 248). Umatilla County: 5 miles east of Milton (Booth, 1945, p. 26). Wallowa
County: Grande Ronde Canyon, [12 miles northeast of] Paradise (Bailey, 1936,
p. 388). Wasurneton: Spokane County: 10 miles north of Spokane (Svihla, 1938,
p.18). Yakima County: Selah (Dalquest, 1948, p. 164). IpaHo: Bannock County:
3-4 miles east of Pocatello, 5,000 feet (Whitlow and Hall, 1933, p. 243); Schutt’s
Mine, 6,300 feet, 9 miles east of Pocatello (Whitlow and Hall, 1933, p. 243); 1
mile east of Portneuf, 4,500 feet (Whitlow and Hall, 1933, p. 248). Bingham
196 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
County: Blackfoot, 4,500 feet (Whitlow and Hall, 1938, p. 246). Bonner County:
Deer Island, Lake Pend Oreille, and near Lakeview (Jones, 1948, p. 416).
Nevapa: Churchill County: 9 miles north of Eastgate (Alcorn, 1944, p. 309); 10
miles southeast of Fallon (Hall, 1946, p. 159); 10 miles south and 5 miles west of
Fallon, 4,300 feet (Hall, 1946, p. 162); 4.5 miles east of Stillwater, 4,000 feet (Hall,
1946, p. 160). Clark County: 7 miles east of Las Vegas (Burt, 1934, p. 397).
Esmeralda County: Chiatovich Ranch, 4,850-4,900 feet (Hall, 1946, p. 162); 1
mile southeast of Dyer Ranch, 5,300 feet (Hall, 1946, p. 160). Lander County:
one-quarter mile west-northwest of Austin (Alcorn, 1944, p. 309). Lyon County:
2 miles southwest of Pine Grove, 7,250 feet (Hall, 1946, p. 160); near Ramsey
(Alcorn, 1944, p. 309); Muriel Bee Mine, 5,800 feet, 4 miles west of Wichman
(Hall, 1946, p. 159); 9 miles east and 2 miles north of Yerington, 4,700 feet (Hall,
1946, p. 159); Bluestone Mine, 5,200 feet, 3.5 miles southwest of Yerington (Hall,
1946, p. 159). Mineral County: Fletcher, 6,100 feet (Frum, 1954, in litt.) ; Stan-
moore Mine, about 7,000 feet, Lapon Canyon, Mount Grant (Hall, 1946, p. 159).
Nye County: Amargosa River, 3,400-3,500 feet, 3.5 miles northeast of Beatty
(Hall, 1946, p. 162); Hot Creek Range, 1 mile west of Hot Creek (Hall, 1946, p.
162); Springdale, north end of Oasis Valley (Davis, 1939, p. 124). Washoe
County: 10 miles north-northwest of Deep Hole, 5,150 feet (Hall, 1946, p. 161);
near Olinghouse (Alcorn, 1944, p. 309); Horse Canyon, 5,800 feet, Pahrum Peak
(Hall, 1946, p. 161); 1 mile southwest of Pyramid Lake (Hall, 1946, p. 162);
Smoke Creek, 9 miles east of California boundary, 3,900 feet (Hall, 1946, p. 162);
2 miles north of Sparks (Alcorn, 1944, p. 309). White Pine County: Lehman Cave,
7,200 feet (Hall, 1946, p. 162). Utan: Beaver County: Fort Beaver, 5,900 feet
(Long, 1940, p. 172). Carbon County: Range Creek (Hardy, 1941, p. 293); Sun-
nyside (Hardy, 1941, p. 293). Emery County: Horse Creek Canyon (Hardy, 1941,
p. 293). Grand County: 4 miles north of Thompsons (Krutzsch and Heppenstall,
1955, p. 127); Post Canyon, Book Cliffs, 8,200 feet, 75 miles south of Ouray
(Krutzsch and Heppenstall, 1955, p. 127). Kane County: 4 miles north of Kanab
(Hardy, 1941, p. 293). San Juan County: Bluff, 3,300 feet (Hardy, 1941, p. 293).
Sanpete County: Pete Canyon, 5,800 feet, west of Wales (Hardy, 1941, p. 293).
Tooele County: Goldhill (Durrant, et al., 1955, p. 72). Uintah County: 1 mile
southeast of Ouray, 4,700 feet (Durrant, 1952, p. 59). Utah County: Rock Can-
yon, near Provo (Biol. Surv. files); east of Springville (Hardy, 1941, p. 293).
Washington County: Apex Mine (Hardy, 1941, p. 293); Bloomington Cavern
(Hardy, 1941, p. 293); Mineral Mountain (Hardy, 1941, p. 293); Zion National
Park (Hardy, 1941, p. 293). Weber County: South fork of Ogden River (Durrant,
et al., 1955, p. 72). Anizona: Cochise County: Portal (Cahalane, 1939, p. 422).
Coconino County: Grand Canyon National Park (Hearst Ranch, Grandview, and
Pasture Wash Ranger Station) (Hoffmeister, 1955, p. 5). Mohave County: Virgin
Narrows, northeast of Littlefield (Hardy, 1949, p. 434). Santa Cruz County: Peiia
Blanca Spring (Campbell, 1934, p. 242). Yavapai County: Martinez Creek, 7
miles southwest of Yarnell (Hatfield, 1942, p. 148). New Mexico: Grant County:
Mule Creek (Bailey, 1931, p. 381). Santa Fe County: Santa Fe (H. Allen, 1864,
p. 65). Texas: Brewster County: Maravillas Canyon, east of Black Gap (Tamsitt,
1954, p. 46) ; southeast slope of Mariscal Mountain, 2,800 feet (Borell and Bryant,
1942, p. 10). Culberson County: Bell Creek, 5,300 feet, 7 miles north of Pine
Springs (Davis and Robertson, 1944, p. 262); Upper Sloth Cave, west slope of
Guadalupe Mts., 7,000 feet (Davis, 1940, p. 74). Hdwards County: Devil’s Sink-
hole, 6.5 miles northeast of Rocksprings, 2,300 feet (White, 1948, p. 6). Harde-
man County: Acme (Dalquest, 1954, in litt.) ; 3 miles southeast of Lazare (Dalquest,
1954, in litt.); Panther Cave, 10 miles southeast of Quanah (Blair, 1954, p. 242).
Presidio County: Sierra Vieja (Blair and Miller, 1949, p. 76). Val Verde County:
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 197
Mouth of Pecos River (Blair, 1952, p. 96). Oxuanoma: Blaine County: Salt
Creek Canyon (Blair, 1939, p. 102); 3 miles southeast of Southard (Blair, 1939,
p. 102). Cimarron County: Tesequite Canyon [1.7 miles southeast of Kenton]
(Glass, 1951, p. 26). Greer County: 3.5 miles north of Jester (Glass, 1955, p. 128).
Harmon County: 3 miles west and 1 mile south of Reed (Glass, 1955, p. 128).
Woods County: 2 miles west of Edith (Blair, 1939, p. 102); 6 miles northeast of
Freedom (Blair, 1939, p. 102); Marehew Cave, one-half mile south of Oklahoma-
Kansas boundary (Hibbard, 1934, p. 237). Woodward County: 10 miles south
of Freedom (Blair, 1939, p. 102). Kansas: Barber County: Several caves 3 to 5
miles southwest of Aetna (Cockrum, 1952, p. 79; Frum, 1954, in litt.; Twente,
1955a, p. 379); several caves 2 to 18 miles south of Sun City (Cockrum, 1952,
p. 79; Hibbard, 1933, p. 233; Twente, 1955a, p. 379). Comanche County: Several
caves 4 to 6 miles west and northwest of Aetna (Cockrum, 1952, p. 79; Hibbard,
1934, p. 287; Twente, 1955a, p. 379). Conorapo: Boulder County: Boulder
Canyon, 7,700 feet (Young, 1908, p. 407); Fourmile Canyon, 7,000 feet, near
Crisman (Cary, 1911, p. 204); 12 miles south of Lyons (G. Allen, 1916, p. 341).
El Paso County: 1 mile north of Glen Eyrie (near Colorado Springs) (Warren,
1942, p. 80). Gunnison County: Gothic, 9,600 feet (Findley and Negus, 1953,
p. 237). Larimer County: Fort Collins (Cary, 1911, p. 204); no exact locality
(Miller, 1897, p. 53). Las Animas County: Trinidad (Warren, 1906, p. 267).
SoutH Dakota: Custer County: Jewel Cave National Monument (National
Park Service Collection, Washington, D.C.). Harding County: Ludlow Cave
Hills (Biol. Surv. files). Stanley County: White River (Biol. Surv. files).
CANADA: British CotumBia: Adam’s River, northwest of Shuswap Lake
(Anderson, 1946, p. 32); Creston, Kootenay River (Anderson, 1946, p. 32);
Keremeos, Similkameen Valley (Anderson, 1946, p. 32); Riske Creek and Williams
River (Cowan and Guiguet, 1956, p. 67).
Plecotus townsendii townsendii Cooper
Plecotus townsendii Cooper, 1837, p. 73, pl. 3, fig. 6.
S[ynotus] townsendit Wagner, 1855, p. 720.
Corinorhinus townsendi Dobson, 1875, p. 356.
Plecotus (Corinorhinus) macrotis Dobson, 1878, p. 180. (Part.)
Corynorhinus macrotis townsendii Miller, 1897, p. 53.
Corynorhinus macrotis intermedius H. W. Grinnell,3 1914, p. 320.
Corynorhinus megalotis townsendi G. M. Allen, 1916, p. 344.
Corynorhinus rafinesquit townsendi H. W. Grinnell, 1918, p. 345.
Corynorhinus townsendit townsendit Handley, 1955c, p. 147.
Hoxrotyrz: Not known to be in existence. Type locality: ‘‘Co-
lumbia River,” herein restricted to Fort Vancouver, Clark County,
Wash.
Distrisution: Coast region of the northwestern United States
and southwestern Canada (fig. 22). North to Comox, Vancouver
Island, British Columbia. South to Santa Barbara County, Calif.
Inland to eastern flanks of Coast Range in south; to eastern flanks of
Cascade Range in north. Zonal distribution: Transition and Upper
Sonoran.
8 Holotype: MVZ No. 7753; adult female, skin and skull; collected 31 July 1909, by J. C. Hawver;
Auburn, Placer County, Calif.; original No. 2387.
198 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Description: Adult coloration: Mass effect of upperparts in
darkest individuals between Natal Brown and Bone Brown, with
little distinction between bases and tips of hairs; mass effect in palest
individuals between Vandyke Brown and Verona Brown, with hair
bases considerably paler than the tips, about Benzo Brown. Hair
of underparts Fuscous at base; darkest individuals have hair tips of
throat and breast between Snuff Brown and Bister, those of the
belly Light Pinkish Cinnamon; palest individuals have hair tips of
entire underparts Light Pinkish Cinnamon. Immature coloration:
Similar to the darkest adults or slightly darker.
Size averages medium for subgenus; forearm averages relatively
short. Construction of skull heavy; rostrum relatively long, inflated,
and not depressed; anterior nares, viewed from above, usually rounded
in posterior outline. Canine strong; first upper incisor frequently
with trace of secondary cusp; P* usually with anterointernal cingular
cusp.
MEASUREMENTS: See tables 12, 18.
Comparisons: P. t. townsendii is the darkest colored and shortest
winged population of the species P. townsendii. Compared with
P. t. pallescens, into which it grades to the east and south, P. t. town-
sendii is darker, averages slightly larger, and has a more robust skull,
heavier rostrum, and anterior nares that average relatively larger
and more rounded in posterior outline.
Remarks: The type locality of this form is not “Columbia River,
Oregon” as has been assumed by many authors (e.g., Miller, 1897,
p. 53; G. M. Allen, 1916, p. 344; Anderson, 1946, p. 33; Miller and
Kellogg, 1955, p. 110). Bailey (1936, p. 387) and Dalquest (1948,
p. 163) were correct in naming “Fort Vancouver, Washington” as
the type locality.
Cooper’s description (1837, p. 73) of Plecotus townsendit was based
on three specimens which he stated had been obtained by J. K. Town-
send on the Columbia River. In the appendix to the narrative of his
journey to the Columbia, Townsend (1839, pp. 324, 325) mentioned
the species as follows:
[Plecotus Townsendii is the] So-capual of the Chinook Indians .... Inhabits
the Columbia river district, rather common. Frequents the store houses attached
to the forts, seldom emerging from them even at night. This, and a species of
Vespertilio, (V. subulatus), which is even more numerous, are protected by the
gentlemen of the Hudson’s Bay Company, for their services in destroying the
dermestes which abound in their fur establishments.—Towns.
In these sentences from Townsend’s narrative there are many
clues to the whereabouts of the type locality of P. townsendit. First
is the fact that the bat ‘Inhabits the Columbia river district.”” Next,
“Frequents the store houses attached to the forts.” According to
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 199
his narrative, Townsend visited four Columbia River forts: Fort
Walla-Walla, near the present site of Wallula, Washington, half a mile
above the mouth of the Walla Walla River; Fort Vancouver, 6 miles
above the mouth of the Willamette River, Clark County, Wash.;
Fort William, on the southwest side of Sauvie Island, Multnomah
County, Oreg.; and Fort George at Astoria, Clatsop County, Oreg.
Fort William can be eliminated immediately, for it was an American
establishment, built during Townsend’s visit. There the bats could
not have been “protected by the gentlemen of the Hudson’s Bay
Company.” ‘Townsend’s citation of a Chinook Indian name for the
bat, ‘‘So-capual of the Chinook Indians,” eliminates Fort Walla-Walla,
because the Chinooks normally did not occur above the cascades of
the Columbia (Townsend, 1839, p. 220), although Townsend’s party
did encounter a band at The Dalles (1839, p. 159). Furthermore,
Cooper’s description agrees with the dark, coastal race of the bat,
whereas a pallid form occurs in the vicinity of Fort Walla-Walla.
Finally, Townsend’s description of Fort George (1839, p. 182) elimi-
nates it as a possibility:
We anchored off Fort George, as it is called, although perhaps it scarcely deserves
the name of a fort, being composed of but one principal house of hewn boards,
and a number of small Indian huts surrounding it, presenting the appearance,
from a distance, of an ordinary small farm house with its appropriate outbuildings.
Compare with this the statement, ‘frequents the store houses at-
tached to the forts.’”’ Townsend described Fort Vancouver, where
he had residence during his months on the Columbia, as follows
(1839, pp. 170-172):
The space comprised within the stoccade is an oblong square, of about one
hundred, by two hundred and fifty feet. The houses built of logs and frame-work,
to the number of ten or twelve, are ranged around in a quadrangular form .
in the vicinity of the fort, are thirty or forty log huts . . . placed in rows, with
broad lanes or streets between them, and the whole looks like a very neat and
beautiful village.
Fort Vancouver appears to be the logical choice for the restricted
type locality of Plecotus townsendii Cooper.
P. t. townsendii intergrades with the very differently colored
P. t. pallescens over a wide area in central and northern California
and northward between the Cascades and the Rockies. Allocation of
specimens, especially in inadequate series, from much of this area
to one race or the other is largely a matter of personal opinion. As a
result, various authors have disagreed on just where the artificial
boundary between the ranges of townsendii and pallescens should be
set. Other authors have chosen to solve the problem by applying a
subspecific name, intermedius, to populations of the intergrading area.
For a discussion of this problem, see the remarks under P. t. pallescens
(p. 192).
200 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM You. 110
Dark-colored populations, resembling those at the type locality
probably occur only in the Coast Ranges and humid lowlands west of
the Cascade Range from northern California northward to Vancouver
Island. Progressive increase in pallor apparently takes place even
as the western slopes of the Cascades are approached. ‘Thus, in the
Willamette Valley in Oregon, specimens from Carver and Vida, at
lower elevations, are darker than those from McKenzie Bridge a little
further up-stream. On the eastern slopes of the Cascades, as at
Boulder Cave, Wash., specimens average even paler, but are, never-
theless, nearer townsendit than pallescens. A single specimen from
Happy Camp, Siskiyou County, Calif., is paler than most other
specimens identified as townsendii, but it is from an area where
townsendii theoretically should occur, and on the supposition that a
larger series would show the average to be nearer townsendit, it has
been identified as that form.
Samples from collecting stations in the lowlands and Coast Range
south of San Francisco Bay are variable, showing intergradation with
P. t. pallescens. From Santa Barbara County northward the samples
average nearer P. t. townsendii in morphological characters.
Plecotus appears to be absent from most parts of the Great Valley
of California.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED: A total of 83, from the following localities:
UNITED STATES: Caurrornia: Alameda County: Mission San Jose, 25s
(MVZ). Fresno County: New Jaria [-New Idria?], 1b (USNM). Marin County:
Nicasio, ls (USNM). Monterey County: Stonewall Creek, 1,300 feet, 6.3 miles
northeast of Soledad, 2s (MVZ). Napa County: Mount Veeder [1,950 feet], is
(USNM). San Benito County: Bear Valley [The Pinnacles, near Cook, 2,000
feet], 2s (USNM); 4 miles west-northwest of Panoche, Is (MVZ). San Luis
Obispo County: 5 miles south-southwest of Adelaida, 2,200 feet, 1s (MVZ);
San Simeon, Ils (MVZ); 6.5 miles southeast of Shandon, 1s (MVZ). San Mateo
County: 2.0 to 2.5 miles east of Pescadero, 2s (MVZ). Santa Clara County:
Evergreen, 2s (MVZ); 2.25 miles northwest of San Felipe, 2s (MVZ). Santa
Cruz County: 2 miles southwest of Brookdale, 1s (MVZ); Mouth of Meder Creek,
2s (MVZ); 2 to 3 miles east of Santa Cruz, 2s (MVZ). Siskiyou County: Happy
Camp, ls (USNM). Orxaon: Clackamas County: Carver, 4s (CNHM), 3s
(USNM). Curry County: Gold Beach, 5s (CNHM), Is (MCZ), 1a (USNM).
Lane County: Creswell, 1a (USNM); McKenzie Bridge, 3s (USNM); Vida, 1s
(USNM). Wasuineton: Kittitas County: Boulder Cave, Naches River, 43 miles
northwest of Yakima, l4as (USNM). Thurston County: Olympia, 1s (USNM).
CANADA: Britis CotumBia: Vancouver Island: Comox, 1s (USNM).
ADDITIONAL RECORDS: The following records probably refer to this
form:
UNITED STATES: Caurirornia: Alameda County: 4 miles east-southeast of
Mission San Jose (Dalquest, 1947, p. 20). Colusa County: 2.25 miles south-
southeast of Wilbur Springs, 1,800 feet (Frum, 1954, in litt.). Humboldt County:
Carlotta (Dickey, 1922, p. 116). Lake County: Long Valley (Dalquest,1947,
p. 20); Lucerne (Frum, 1954, in litt.); 4 miles east of Upper Lake (Dalquest,
AMERICAN BATS—-HANDLEY 201
1947, p. 20). Marin County: Inverness (Pearson, et al., 1952, p. 275); 1.3 miles
southeast of Inverness (Frum, 1954, in litt.). Mendocino County: 1.5 miles
north of Gualala (Dalquest, 1947, p. 20). Napa County: Aetna Springs (Pearson,
et al., 1952, p. 275); one-half mile south of Angwin, 1,600 feet, and 1 mile south of
Angwin, 1,500 feet (Dalquest, 1947, p. 20); 4 miles south of Calistoga (Dalquest,
1947, p. 20); near Knoxville, 2,000 feet (Pearson, et al., 1952, p. 279); Pope Creek,
8 miles northwest of Monticello (Dalquest, 1947, p. 20). San Benito County:
Hernandez (H. W. Grinnell, 1914, p. 320). Sonoma County: 10 miles east of
Stewart’s Point (Dalquest, 1947, p. 20). Orscon: Clackamas County: Clacka-
mas (V. Bailey, field notes). Josephine County: Siskiyou Mts., Oregon Caves
National Monument (Roest, 1951, p. 346). Lane County: Eugene (Bailey, 1936,
p. 387). Multnomah County: Portland (Bailey, 1936, p. 387). WasHINGTON:
Clallam County: Elwha River (Johnson and Johnson, 1952, p. 33). Clark County:
Fort Vancouver (Bailey, 1936, p. 386). King County: Seattle (Dalquest, 1948,
p. 163). Mason County: Lake Cushman (Dice, 1932, p. 48). Pierce County:
Puyallup (Dalquest, 1938, p. 213). San Juan County: Blakeley Island (Dal-
quest, 1948, p. 162); Friday Harbor (Dalquest, 1948, p. 161). County uncertain:
Hood’s Canal (Johnson and Johnson, 1952, p. 33).
CANADA: British Cotumpra: Nanaimo Bay, Vancouver Island (Anderson,
1946, p. 33); Newcastle Island (Anderson, 1946, p. 33).
Plecotus townsendii virginianus Handley
Corynorhinus macrotis A. H. Howell, 1909, p. 68. (Part.)
Corynorhinus megalotis megalotis G. M. Allen, 1916, p. 338. (Part.)
Corynorhinus rafinesquit Thomas, 1916, p. 127. (Part.)
Corynorhinus townsendii virginianus Handley, 1955c, p. 148.
Hoxtotyese: USNM 269163; adult male, skin and skull; collected
12 November 1939, by W. J. Stephenson; Schoolhouse Cave, 4.4
miles northeast of Riverton, 2,205 feet, Pendleton County, W. Va.;
no collector’s number.
Distrrisution: Central part of Appalachian Highlands in eastern
Kentucky, western Virginia, and eastern West Virginia (fig. 23).
North to Hardy, Grant, and Preston Counties, W. Va. West to
Preston, Tucker, and Randolph Counties, W. Va. South to Ran-
dolph and Pendleton Counties, W. Va. East to Pendleton and Hardy
Counties, W. Va. Apparently isolated populations further south
and west, in Tazewell County, Va., and Powell County, Ky. Zonal
distribution, Transition. Altitudinal distribution, 1,700 to 3,500
feet.
Descrietion: Adult coloration: Hair of upperparts about Benzo
Brown at base; subterminal band orange-brown, tip dark brown;
mass effect between Prout’s Brown and Bister. Hair of underparts
between Light Vinaceous-Cinnamon and Light Pinkish Cinnamon
distally, occasionally somewhat darker on throat and chin; bases,
except of those hairs bordering membranes, Fuscous; border hairs
monocolored. Distinction between tip and base of hair sharp on under-
parts, poor on dorsum. Immature coloration: Hair of upperparts
202 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
between Natal Brown and Benzo Brown distally; bases slightly grayer,
hardly distinguished from tips. Hair of underparts Mouse Gray at
base, pale buff at tip; distinction between base and tip slight.
Size averages medium for subgenus; forearm averages relatively
long. Rostrum relatively long and not depressed; anterior nares
(viewed from above) wide and rounded in posterior outline. First
upper incisor usually without trace of secondary cusp.
MEASUREMENTS: See tables 12, 18.
Comparisons: Compared with P. ft. ingens, P. t. virginianus is
more sooty dorsally and averages slightly smaller in all dimensions;
the first upper incisor rarely has a trace of a secondary cusp; and the
rostrum is less heavy and inflated.
Remarks: The Appalachian populations (P. t. virginianus) appear
to be isolated by no less than 600 miles from the nearest closely
related populations (P. ¢. ingens) in the Ozark Highlands. Despite
this separation, the two forms are not strikingly different, and although
there is no possibility of demonstrating intergradation between them,
they may be treated best as being conspecific. On the other hand,
the Appalachian populations of P. townsendii are specifically distinct
from P. rafinesquii, whose geographic range they overlap. This
peculiar pattern of distribution, perhaps related to Pleistocene dis-
turbances, is discussed in the section on history (p. 215).
There is no obvious explanation for the limited and apparently
discontinuous distribution of the populations within the bounds of
the Appalachian Highlands. The species is relatively numerous, even
the most abundant bat in some caves, in two adjacent drainage sys-
tems in northeastern West Virginia. It has been found in at least 15
caves at the head of the Potomac River and in four caves at the head
of the Cheat River. All of these caves are in limestone, in an area
30 miles wide and 40 miles long. Three other populations have been
discovered away from this main body: One a few miles to the north
in Preston County, W. Va. (Kellogg, 1937, p. 450), another 150 miles
to the south-southwest in a limestone cavern in Tazewell County, Va.
(Howell, 1909, p. 68; Mohr, 1933, p. 49), and the third in a cave 200
miles to the west-southwest in Powell County, Ky. (Barbour, 1957,
p. 141). The intervening extensive limestone caverns, mostly well
explored, in Pocahontas, Greenbrier, and Monroe Counties, W. Va.,
and in the Valley of Virginia do not seem to be occupied by the
species.
Isolation such as apparently exists among the Kentucky, Virginia,
and West Virginia populations of this species favors differentiation.
It is not surprising then that differentiation is evident. Virginia and
Kentucky specimens average smaller than those from West Virginia.
Kentucky and West Virginia specimens are similar in color to Virginia
AMERICAN BATS—-HANDLEY 203
specimens obtained in 1908. However, specimens collected in Virginia
in 1957 average considerably darker, more sooty, both dorsally and
ventrally, than those collected recently in Kentucky and West Virginia
or in the same Virginia cave fifty years earlier. They resemble typical
P. t. townsendii in coloration.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED: A total of 100, from the following U.S.
localities:
Kentucky: Powell County: Natural Bridge State Park, 2s (UK). Virerntia:
Tazewell County: Burkes Garden, 3,200 feet, 9as (USNM). West VircInia:
Grant County: 10 miles south of Petersburg, 3s (CM). Pendleton County: Cave
Mountain Cave, 2,450 feet, 1.4 miles west of Brushy Run, llas (USNM); Hellhole,
2,200 feet, 3.6 miles northeast of Riverton, 5a (USNM); Hoffman School Cave,
2,175 feet, 4.9 miles south-southwest of Franklin, 2s (USNM); Schoolhouse Cave,
2,205 feet, 4.4 miles northeast of Riverton, 3las (USNM); ‘“‘Smokehole” [=Smoke-
hole Cave, 1,730 feet, 1.9 miles west-northwest of Brushy Run?], 29abs (AMNH);
“Cave Rock Cave, Smokehole” [=Cave Mountain Cave, 2,450 feet, 1.4 miles
west of Brushy Run?], 8s (AMNH).
ADDITIONAL RECORDS: The following records probably refer to this
form:
Kentucky: Rowan County: Carter Caves (Welter and Sollberger, 1939, p. 79).
West VirGinia: Grant County: Klines Gap Cave, 1,700 feet, 4 miles southwest
of Maysville (Frum, 1954, in litt.); Peacock Cave, 1,755 feet, 7.6 miles southwest
of Petersburg (Fowler, 1941a, p. 35) ; Petersburg (McKeever, 1952, p. 47). Hardy
County: Baker’s Cave, near Durgon [apparently not the ‘‘Baker Cave” of Davies,
1949, p. 139] (Wilson, 1946, p. 86). Pendleton County: Mill Run Cave, 1,800
feet, one-half mile southeast of Kline (Frum, 1954, in litt.); Seneca Caverns,
2,200 feet, 3 miles northeast of Riverton (Reese, 1934, p. 47); Sinnit Cave, 2,250
feet, one-quarter mile northwest of Moyers (Frum, 1954, in litt.) ; Thompson Cave,
2,350 feet, 1.5 miles east-southeast of Riverton (Frum, 1954, in litt.) [=5.6 miles
north-northeast of Circleville, 2,350 feet (McKeever, 1952, p. 47)?]; Torys Cave,
2,000 feet, 5 miles southwest of Franklin (Frum, 1954, in litt.) [=Tory’s Cave, 10
miles south of Franklin (Barbour, 1951b, p. 369)?]; Trout Cave, 5 miles southwest
of Franklin (Fowler, 1941b, p. 47). Preston County: No exact locality (Kellogg,
1937, p. 450; Barbour, 195la, p. 50). Randolph County: 6.7 miles east-northeast
of Glady, 3,500 feet (McKeever, 1952, p. 47); The Sinks, Cave No. 1, 3,500 feet,
one-half mile west of Osceola (Reese, 1934, p.47). Tucker County: Arbegast Cave,
2,600 feet, 6 miles southeast of Hendricks (Frum, 1954, in litt.); Cave Hollow
Cave, 2,400 feet, 5 miles southeast of Hendricks (Frum, 1954, in litt.).
INCERTAE SEDIS
Vespertilio maugei Desmarest
Vespertilio mauget Desmarest, 1819, p. 480.
Plecotus Maugei Lesson, 1827, p. 96.
Vespertilio (Plecotus) Maugei Cooper, 1837, p. 71.
Synotus Maugei Wagner, 1855, p. 719.
Vespertilio mauget H. E. Anthony, 1916, p. 360.
Houotyrr: From Puerto Rico. Collected by Maugé. The pres-
ent disposition of the holotype is unknown. Some of Desmarest’s
204. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM You. 110
types are in the Paris Museum, but Rode (1941) did not list Vesper-
tilio maugei in his catalog of the type specimens of Chiroptera in the
Paris Museum.
Distrispution: ‘Puerto Rico.”
Description: Following is my translation of Desmarest’s (1819,
p. 480) description:
Vespertilio maugei, new species.
This bat, brought back from Puerto Rico by the late Maugé, is of medium size
and approaches, in its physiognomy, the barbastelle, notably by the distinguishing
character of the union of the ears at their internal bases.
Its pelage is long, silky, of a blackish brown above, lighter beneath, particularly
in the region near the interfemoral membrane, where it becomes almost white;
its tail is nearly as long as the body; its membranes are of a dark gray.
Its mouth is provided with four upper incisors of which the two inner are the
largest, separated from one another and bifurcate, the exterior being simple;
the six lower incisors overlap one another and have three lobes, and medium-sized
canines are very closely followed by the molars.
The muzzle is short, slender, pointed, and forms, with the ears, a right angle;
the nose is rather broad, that is to say, that the nostrils are separated by a cartilage
in the form of a plate, which resembles somewhat a lyre; the ears are large, their
extremity is rounded, their exterior border notched, with a longitudinal fold
provided with very dense and very noticeable hairs; the tragi are pointed and do
not reach half the height of the ears; the eyes are small and placed at the base of the
latter.
Desmarest (1820, p. 145) modified this description slightly the fol-
lowing year. My translation of the most significant portions of the
new description is as follows:
Ears very large, united, notched exteriorly near the tip . .. Dimensions, a
little larger than the barbastelle. . . .”
Remarks: For the early 19th century these are surprisingly detailed
descriptions. However, the bat described is quite unlike any bat
known to occur in the West Indies. Eptesicus is the only vespertil-
ionid that has subsequently been collected on Puerto Rico, and
Myotis, Nycticeius, and Lasiurus are the only other vespertilionid
genera recorded from the West Indies.
Vespertilio maugei has been overlooked or ignored by most authors.
Those who have considered it (see synonymy, p. 203) have thought
it to be a species of Plecotus. Plecotus has not been collected subse-
quently in the West Indies, however, and no skeletal remains of
Plecotus have been recognized in the sub-Recent bone deposits that
are abundant in West Indian caves.
Anthony (1918, p. 360) suggested that Maugé’s specimen actually
was a Plecotus which had been obtained in the United States and was
attributed to Puerto Rico by mistake. It is true that Desmarest’s
descriptions agree in some details with Plecotus, but there are many
discrepancies: Coloration of the underparts is wrong, the canines
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 205
are not “very closely followed by the molars,” the nostrils are not
separated by a lyre-shaped plate, and the auricles are not notched on
their exterior borders.
There is a possibility that the description of V. mauget is a com-
posite. The dental characters could apply to Eptesicus. Externally,
the West Indian phyllostomid Macrotus waterhousi: agrees fairly
well with Desmarest’s description. Although its tail is a trifle short,
and its nose leaf can hardly be said to be “‘lyre-shaped,” it nevertheless
has unusually large ears, connected at their internal bases, and its
coloration exactly matches Desmarest’s description. On the other
hand, with regard to its dentition, Macrotus bears no resemblance
whatsoever to the description of “V. mauger.”’
It seems probable that the bat Desmarest described was
the Eurasian Barbastella, with which his descriptions agree in all
details. In all probability the specimen did not originate in Puerto
Rico or elsewhere in the Western Hemisphere. Consequently, the
name Vespertilio maugei should be placed in the synonymy of Barba-
stella and should be disassociated from Plecotus and the American
fauna.
History
PALEONTOLOGICAL RECORD
CHIROPTERA
The paleontological record is so fragmentary for bats that few
conclusions can be drawn from it. Crania and upper dentitions are
disappointingly rare in fossil bat material. The commonest remains
are mandibles or long bones, neither of which, when isolated and
fragmentary, are very satisfactory for studies of evolution and rela-
tionships or even for taxonomic classification. Paradoxically, the
oldest known chiropteran remains—those of Archaconycteris, Palaeo-
chiropteryz, and Cecilionycteris of the Middle Eocene—are also
the best preserved. Complete dentitions and skeletons are intact,
and even the outlines of the wing membranes can be traced (G.
Allen, 1939, p. 177).
Most of the work on fossil Chiroptera has been done in Europe.
A majority of the named forms and a preponderance of the literature
on the subject are from that region. Investigations conducted else-
where, principally in China and in the United States are insignificant
by comparison. Preglacial fissure and cave microfaunas have been
virtually untouched outside of Europe.
The European record indicates that the extinct families Archaeonyc-
teridae and Palaeochiropterygidae occurred with some variety in
Middle Eocene time. Rhinolophidae were numerous and predominant
in Upper Eocene and Oligocene deposits. Species of Megadermatidae
206 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
and Emballonuridae were somewhat less numerous during the same
period. The Vespertilionidae became abundant somewhat later.
FAMILY VESPERTILIONIDAE
According to Revilliod (1919, p. 94), the genus Stehlinia [= Nycter-
obius Revilliod and Revilliodia Simpson (Handley, 1955a, p. 128)] of
the Quercy fauna of the Upper Eocene or Lower Oligocene of Europe
is the most ancient known vespertilionid. It has cranial characters
of the Vespertilionidae, but is distinguished from modern genera by
several primitive characters, including very elongated rostrum, rela-
tively very long premolar series, and 2-rooted P!. It most closely
resembles some of the small species of Myotis, which is generally con-
ceded to be the most primitive living genus of the family.
True Myotis appears for the first time in the Stampien and Aqui-
tanien faunas of the Middle and Upper Oligocene of Europe [Myotis
salodorensis Revilliod (1919, p. 94) and Myotis insignis von Meyer
(Revilliod, 1922, p. 166)]. Other Myotis have been described from
the Middle Miocene of Europe [Myotis antiquus Gaillard (1899, p. 8)
and Myotis sancti-albani Viret (1951, p. 19)], and Myotis-like remains
occur in Lower Miocene beds in Florida (Lawrence, 1943, p. 364).
Some of the Recent species of Myotis (M. bechsteinn, M. mystacinus,
and M. oxygnathus) were possibly derived by Pliocene or Lower
Pleistocene time (e.g., see Heller, 1930, p. 154; Kormos, 1937, p. 338;
and Kowalski, 1956, p. 331), although most late Tertiary and Quater-
nary material has been described as now extinct species (e.g., see
Heller, 1936, p. 113; Kormos, 1934, p. 306; Kowalski, 1956, p. 331;
Sickenburg, 1939, p. 8; and Wettstein, 1923, p. 40).
Another primitive vespertilionid genus, Miniopterus, is thought to
have been recognizable as far back as the Miocene epoch (WM. fossilis,
Zapfe, 1950, p. 60). The Lower Pliocene Mystipterus (Hall, 1930,
p. 319) from Nevada, first supposed to be related to Miniopterus,
subsequently has been shown to be an insectivore (Patterson and
McGrew, 1937, p. 256).
The oldest Eptesicus-like remains are from Lower Miocene beds
of Florida (Lawrence, 1943, p. 367). Other Eptesicus-like genera,
Samonycteris (Revilliod, 1919, p. 95) and Pareptesicus (Zapfe, 1950,
p. 58), have been described from the Miocene of Europe. From the
Upper Pliocene of Arizona comes Simonycteris (Stirton, 1931, p. 27),
also possibly a relative of Eptesicus. The most ancient remains at-
tributed to true H’ptescius are those discovered in the Pliocene or Lower
Pleistocene of Hungary (Kormos, 1930a, p.41). Brown (1908, p. 174)
regarded Middle Pleistocene material from the Conard Fissure of
Arkansas as being only subspecifically distinct from the Recent
Eptesicus fuscus. Gidley and Gazin (1938, p. 11), with more abundant
207
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY
(CUE SSGE) sPaeH one cou
Q[¥OS DUTT] [ed1Z0}OaN “snjorajg Jo v1ouasqns Sutmoys yosul YUM ‘e1oued pruoliiiedsaa surOs Jo UOTNq!IsIp Jeo1so;ouoIYyS Jo sIvWIsyY—"SZ AUN
\ Suvgs) NOITMW Ol
| : 3N39031Vd
eal
and | A
/ rae SUV3A NOITTIN 02
i Me of “S 3N3903
i I ts po rs
\ \
S903 - ye 7 oO
f SNNIHHONAOD / a
| STSALOANOIO / ay \.
—_———. —t——— ViniHal ‘
{ aN
ee)
} oe eS SUV3A NOITIIN ZI
come / -StLOaW * an3909170
- ‘
32 1 | I
{ \
SWuOS Ne SWu04
3nIN-SNdISalda we H “"s. | 3NIT-SILOAW
A ~N 1 i ; \
Z ‘ l { { \ SUV3A. NOITTIN, 91
see Tas { SHUsLdOININ I \ 3N390IN
ge ! ao Ns f
/ { | ” ak t
i STESLOANOWWS =| | i H
} y OMILYadS3A i
Perea 1
oe se. SUV3A NOITHW ID
‘ x s : Vitaisveuve 3N390I1d
1 i
!
a a ee é Ne
snynisv1 1W3LIANOWIS ‘SNDIS31d3
SSS ee a ee ee : a ee | ee ee ee
VAYAINS SuvV3A NOITNIW |
4N393YN 8 J3N3901SI91d
497256—59——8
208 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
material from the Pleistocene of Cumberland Cave, Md., agreed that
the relationship of grandis to the Recent species is close but believed
it to be sufficiently different to warrant specific separation.
Records for Barbastella (Wettstein, 1931 p. 780), Lasiurus (Hibbard,
1950, p. 134), and Vespertilio (Kormos, 1934, p. 312) extend back at
least to the Pliocene. Numerous other Recent vespertilionid genera
have been identified in Pleistocene deposits.
To recapitulate: The oldest recognizable vespertilionid was of
Upper Eocene or Lower Oligocene age. The morphologically more
primitive Recent genera emerged in the Oligocene and Miocene.
Recent species of these genera were in some instances perhaps derived
as early as the Pliocene, although fossil species of the same genera
persisted into the Pleistocene (fig. 25).
Genus Plecotus
Vespertilio (Plecotus) grivensis Depéret
Remains undoubtedly referable to Plecotus have been found only
in Upper Pliocene (possibly actually Lower Pleistocene) and Pleisto-
cene deposits. Records of greater antiquity are erroneous or question-
able. The controversial Vespertilio (Plecotus) grivensis of Depéret
(1892, p. 11, pl. 2) from the Vindobonien (Middle Miocene) fauna of
Grive Saint-Alban, France,is a case in point. Depéret’s material
consisted of two fragmentary mandibles. Gaillard (1899, p. 7) later
reported a total of four mandible fragments from Grive Saint-Alban
in the Museum of Lyon. All apparenty agreed with V. grivensis,
but did not elucidate the unknown portions of the mandible.
Depéret (loc. cit.) believed that the remains most closely resembled
Plecotus, and to this opinion Wettstein (1931, p. 779) agreed. On the
other hand, Gaillard (loc. cit.) preferred to leave the generic desig-
nation questionable. When Revilliod (1922, p. 172) reviewed all the
Tertiary Chiroptera, his conclusion was that Vespertilio grivensis
was in actuality a Myotis.
More recently, Viret (1951, p. 21) redescribed and figured the
specimens (now totaling five fragments) of Vespertilio grivensis which
were initially reported by Depéret and Gaillard. Viret argued con-
vincingly that the type and one additional fragment should beregarded
as Rhinolophus grivensis, while the third fragment proved to be Myotis
sancti-albani, the fourth Sorex pusillus, and the fifth indeterminate.
Plecotus crassidens Kormos
Next in geologic age is the Pliocene or Lower Pleistocene Plecotus
crassidens of Kormos (1930b, p. 238) from Hungary and Poland.
Kormos did not figure the fragmentary mandible upon which he based
the name, and there was nothing positive about his description.
AMERICAN BATS—-HANDLEY 209
Subsequently, however, Kowalski (1956, p. 359, pl. 3) figured and
described in detail ten maxillary and cranial frgaments which he had
compared directly with Kormos’ type of P. crassidens. He character-
ized P. crassidens as follows: RostRUM BROAD (much more so than in
P. auritus), FLATTENED, AND WITH A MEDIAN DEPRESSION; intermaxil-
lary notch broad and cordate; palate extends one molar breadth poster-
ior to toothrows;LACHRYMAL [AND SUPRAORBITAL] REGIONS NOT RIDGED;
P‘ labially broader and less obliquely placed than in P. auritus; molars
larger and more massive than in P. auritus; coronoid process of man-
dible distinctly pointed; angular process broad and blunt and deflected
outward; P; smaller than P,; P, 2-rooted, subquadrate in basal cross-
section, provided with strong cingulum, and not so high as Mi; Ms;
talonid narrower than trigonid. Also apparent from Kowalski’s
figures, although not stated in his description are the facts that the
braincase bulges dorsally in the parietal region, and THE ZYGOMATIC
ARCH IS NOT EXPANDED IN ITS MIDDLE THIRD (posterior third missing).
The characters in larger type relate P. crassidens to the subgenus
Corynorhinus, while the shape and 2-rooted condition of P, show an
affinity to the subgenus Plecotus.
On the basis of these specimens Kowalski (1956, p. 340) supposed
that the North American Corynorhinus might be a relict of the Tegelien
Interglacial of Europe (possibly equivalent to the Aftonian Inter-
glacial of North America), analogous to the several species of the
Tegelien flora, now extinct in Europe but persisting in North America.
Plecotus abeli Wettstein
Wettstein (1923, p. 39; 1931, p. 779) described abundant Pleistocene
remains from the Drachenhéhle in Austria as belonging to a distinct
species, Plecotus abeli, averaging slightly smaller than the Recent
form and having the cusps of the lower molars not so high and sharp.
Kowalski (1956, p. 361), judging from Wettstein’s descriptions, ven-
tured the opinion that P. abeli was no more than subspecifically
distinct from P. auritus.
Plecotus auritus Linnaeus
Most of the undoubted remains of Plecotus that have turned up in
the Pleistocene and dubiously Upper Pliocene fissure and cave de-
posits of Europe have been identified as Plecotus auritus, the Recent
species now inhabiting Europe (e.g., see Heller, 1930, p. 154; 1936,
p. 112; Kowalski, 1956, p. 361; and Sickenburg, 1939, p. 9).
Corynorhinus alleganiensis Gidley and Gazin
Corynorhinus alleganiensis from Cumberland Cave, Md. (Gidley,
1913, p. 96; Gidley and Gazin, 1933, p. 345; 1938, p. 12), is the best
210 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
known North American fossil Plecotus. The geologic age of this
species cannot be determined stratigraphically, since the material
upon which it is based is from a fissure type deposit. However, the,
fauna associated with the bat remains is certainly Pleistocene in age
and Gazin (in Gidley and Gazin, 1938, p. 7) concluded from the number
of extinct forms present and from the difficulty encountered in identi-
fying others as Recent that the Cumberland Cave fauna can hardly
be considered Upper Pleistocene, and is more likely Middle Pleistocene
in age. There is no reason to suppose that the bat remains were not
deposited at the same time as the remainder of the Cumberland Cave
fauna.
P. alleganiensis was similar in many respects to (and possibly
directly ancestral to) P. townsendii, the Plecotus occurring nearer
than any other to Cumberland Cave today. It possessed the primitive
characteristics of supraorbital ridge and lack of a sagittal crest. See
pages 137-139 for a full description of P. alleganiensis.
Corynorhinus tetralophodon Handley
The other American Pleistocene species, C. tetralophodon, from San
Josecito Cave, Nuevo Leén, Mexico, is known from a single skull. It
was found in a cave deposit of indeterminable age, but judging from
its similarity to Recent forms and from the associated fauna, it is
probably Upper Pleistocene (Wisconsin) in age and younger than
Plecotus alleganiensis. It differs from Recent forms in possession of
a fourth commissure on M? and in failure of the temporal ridges to
coalesce completely. Probably it was related most closely to P.
townsendii, but possibly was not a direct ancestor of that species.
See page 140 for a full description of P. tetralophodon.
ORIGIN AND DISPERSAL OF EUDERMA AND PLECOTUS
The paleontological record is so incomplete that a discussion of
the origin and dispersal of Huderma and Plecotus necessarily must rely
heavily upon speculation. However, with the historical record of
other vespertilionid groups in mind, and with the evidence of present
day geographic distribution of taxonomic characters in Huderma and
Plecotus as a factual foundation, there is ground for speculation on the
evolution of these genera. In the systematic section and in the pre-
ceding paragraphs of this section the facts have been presented.
The remainder of this section is devoted to an interpretation of them.
Several factors govern the dispersal of bats. Of paramount im-
portance are food supply and shelter. For insectivorous forms, such
as Huderma and Plecotus, the vegetation controlling the distribution
of the bat’s insect prey and the climate controlling the distribution
of the vegetation are the ultimate critical factors in the bat’s dispersal
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 211
as far as food supply is concerned. For antisocial, nonmigratory,
cool climate inhabitants, such as some Plecotus are, not only is the
presence of caves suitable for hibernation essential, but the caves
must be sufficiently abundant to allow a degree of privacy and isola-
tion from other species of bats. Unfortunately, it is not possible to
index all of these factors through time. Otherwise, a more satisfactory
picture of the differentiation and dispersal of these bats might be
drawn with less recourse to speculation.
The present distribution of Huderma and Plecotus and their relative,
Barbastella, coincides rather closely with the North Temperate zone.
Thus, it may be assumed that tropical and boreal climates have
served as barriers to their dispersal. The center of origin for the
group may have been either Nearctic or Palearctic. Since distantly
related primitive forms and closely related progressive forms occur in
both regions, a hypothesis of multiple invasion is required to explain
present distributions regardless of which region may have served as
the center of origin. No paleontological record is available for the
more primitive forms, so paleontology gives no hint of origin or an-
cestry. If it be assumed that the area of most active differentiation
and greatest elaboration of forms indicates the center of origin of a
group of animals, and that the most advanced, most progressive, and
most specialized form is to be found about the center of origin, while
the most primitive, most conservative, and least progressive is to be
found on the peripheries (Matthew, 1939, p. 32), then it must be
reckoned that this group of bats originated in the Nearctic.
ANCESTRAL FORMS
It is probable that the ancestral forms were derived early in the
Cenozoic, since the related living genus Myotis is recognizable at least
as far back as Middle Oligocene. During the Eocene and Oligocene
epochs, low relief of the northern continents and lack of climatic
barriers permitted a moist temperate forest to extend from Greenland
across northern America to Alaska, Siberia, northern Europe, and
Spitzbergen. A land bridge at Bering Strait intermittently connected
North America and Eurasia [indicated by strong Lower Eocene,
Upper Eocene, and Lower Oligocene migrations of mammals (Simp-
son, 1947, p. 625)]. The temperate forest of this region was char-
acterized by redwood (Sequoia), and included such other trees and
shrubs as alder (Alnus), dogwood (Cornus), maple (Acer), oak (Quer-
cus), ash (Fraximus), madrone (Arbutus), beech (Fragus), and elm
(Ulmus) (Cain, 1944, p. 107). During this period the ancestors of
Euderma and Plecotus possibly could have had a Holarctic distribution.
Continental uplift, beginning in the Oligocene epoch and continuing
to the present time, led to a gradual southward spread of the temperate
212 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
forests, so that in the Miocene they became discontinuous, with seg-
ments in North America and Eurasia (Cain, 1944, p. 107). Presum-
ably, the distribution of the ancestors of Huderma and Plecotus may
have become discontinuous at the same time, providing isolation for
major evolution within the group.
The Eurasian segment developed into an evolutionary dead end,
Barbastella, which, though greatly modified in form, represents the
ancestral stock. Barbasiella has a geographic range most remote from
the postulated Nearctic center of origin of the group.
Genus Fuderma
Meanwhile, in the North American segment, evolution was rapid
and spectacular, directed toward auditory specialization. Huderma is
a derivative of the early stages of this evolution. It is the most
specialized, and, in many respects, the most primitive of the big-eared
forms. It must have had a long period of evolution along its own
line, distinct from that of the other members of the group. Whereas
Euderma has developed characters of its own, such as the connection
of the posterior basal lobe of the auricle with the tragus, unique colora-
tion, reduction of dentition, and specialization of the canines, among
the other big-eared forms (genus Plecotus) there have been only minor
variations of features common to all. The nature of the isolating
mechanism that allowed the divergence of the Plecotus and Huderma
stems is not apparent. Possibly Huderma was southern and wide-
spread during Pliocene and had its range restricted and displaced by
the more northern Plecotus during the Pleistocene glaciations.
Genus Plecotus
Subgenus Idionycteris
The species of Plecotus seem to represent evolutionary stages.
P. phyllotis is most primitive and conservative, and most like Huderma;
P. auritus is somewhat more progressive; and P. mexicanus, P. rafines-
qu, and P. townsendui are most progressive. P. phyllotis presumably
diverged from the main stem while it still bore much resemblance to
the earlier derived Huderma. P. phyllotis failed to match the special-
izations of the later derived forms, and if abundance and area of
distribution be taken as measures of success, it definitely occupies a
position inferior to them. It seems to be extremely rare, and inhabits
a restricted area on the fringe of the ranges of P. mexicanus and
P. townsend. On the other hand, the more progressive P. auritus
and P. townsendw are widely distributed, with ranges trans-continental
in scope, and are relatively abundant. P. auritus is even the most
abundant bat in some parts of its range.
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 213
Subgenus Plecotus
Invasion of Eurasia by way of the Bering Strait area by the P.
auritus stock probably occurred during the Pliocene [much migration
in Middle and Upper Pliocene (Simpson, 1947, p. 625)]. This would
have required @ more northern distribution than any species of Plecotus
has today. Changes in habits or habitat could have allowed a more
northern range.
Species of Plecotus now range into the warmer portions of the Cana-
dian life zone (and its Eurasian equivalent). The cooler portions of this
zone lie within 1,000 miles of Bering Strait. Only aslight amelioration
of today’s climate would be required to provide similar floral conditions
to Bering Strait. The present wide distribution of cool climates seems
to be an exception in geological history. Even during the Pleistocene
“Tce Age” warm climates and their associated faunas extended farther
north during the interglacial periods than they do today. Presumably,
during the Pliocene, warmer climates may have extended even farther
north.
If the pre-Pliocene Plecotus-like bats were not cave inhabitants, then
a change in habit to include cave roosting would have allowed a more
northern dispersal, provided suitable food supplies and adequate caves
were available. Resort to caves for hibernation permits habitation of
areas with colder winters. It also provides refuge in eras of changing
climate, for modification of the climate within the cave may be negli-
gible in comparison with the change on the surface. Barbastella and
Plecotus auritus frequently roost during the summer under loose bark
on tree trunks, in cavities in trees and under the eaves of houses, but
usually hibernate in caves or in attics of houses. The most primitive
living species of the subgenus Corynorhinus, P. rafinesquii, appears
to be primarily a tree rooster, whereas the progressive species P.
townsendiz seems to roost only in caves and houses.
The ancestors of Plecotus auritus spread through most of the tem-
perate portions of Eurasia, but were blocked from southward expansion
into Maylasia and Africa by the hot climates of the equatorial regions.
They came eventually to overlap broadly and perhaps partially dis-
place the range of their relative, Barbastella, a rather rare bat whose
continent-spanning range averages somewhat more southern than the
range of P. auritus.
The Plecotus that now inhabits Eurasia and northern Africa is
probably not very different in appearance from the pre-Pleistocene
migrant. This may be inferred from its similarity to the primitive
New World species P. phyllotis and Pleistocene P. alleganiensis and
P. crassidens. If a common origin for these forms and P. auritus be
envisioned, and if a pre-Pleistocene dispersal of Plecotus into Eurasia
VOL. 110
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM
214
‘UO eIDe]S DUII0ISIO[q JO saseyd 10}¥] 0} UONLIAI UI Snurysoukso7) SNUAZQNS ay} JO UOTINIIYsIp [eONaI0VYT—'9Z AUNT
“WwSu3adSid OL SHaINuVE
JO WOV7 ONV 3LYVWITD QTIW
39V IVIOVIOYALNI
HLNOWYVA
Z
emesis ww ww ww we em ee = =
/
LN3W93S
eon Ale ae a 39vV IwI0Vv19
OLNI NOILV10S!I ‘3ONVYH 4O AVIGNicen
NOILOVYLNOD 3SNVO syYuazIdNv19 } A +44
1
ee ce ee ee ee es ee ee ee ee ee ee ee nn i an a ns nr rrr rrr
“SLW NVOIX3SW NI LN3W93S
S3LVIOSI ALVWII1D ONIWYVM
“NOILVILN3Y354!10 40 13A37
S3193dS LV LN3W93S 3S
“TwSuadSid OL SYaINYuVE
JO WOV1 GNVY 31LVWITD GTIW
39V IVIOVISYSILNI
NOWVONYWS
\
ee ee we we we ee we ee we ee we we we eye a ae aw ww w/w ww ww www wm awn ere
£ \ /
"NOILVILN3Y¥34410 JO
13A317 $3193dS LY LN3W93S
NVOIX3JN “MS NI ONY SyYuVZO : 39¥ IWWIdv19
OQNV SNVIHOV1IVdd¥ YyaN : NISNOOSIM
SLN3W93S 31v10SI ‘3ONVY 4O
NOILOVYLNOD 3SNWO SHzINvI19 LNaW9a3aS LN3W9 3S
NVIHOV1Vdd¥ »YYZO
AMERICAN BATS—-HANDLEY 215
be accepted, then the morphological similarities between Old and New
World Plecotus must be characters that were shared before dispersal
occurred.
The primitive Corynorhinus-like Plecotus crassidens may have
reached Eurasia in a secondary Pliocene invasion, bringing it into
contact with the already widespread and firmly established P. auritus.
Apparently it did not persist beyond the early Pleistocene and left
no derivatives.
Subgenus Corynorhinus
The group of species that form the American subgenus Corynorhinus
seem to represent the stem of the evolutionary line that has developed
Barbastella, Euderma, and Plecotus. The present center of differentia-
tion of this division appears to be in the arid southwestern portion of
the United States. This area is presently inhabited by Plecotus town-
sendit, a form that is actively differentiating today. It is the most
abundant and widespread member of the subgenus, there is much
regional variation within its large geographic range, and its range is
fringed with derivatives from it or from its immediate ancestors.
The evolution and present distribution of the Recent species of the
subgenus Corynorhinus can possibly be related to glacial disturbances
during the Pleistocene (fig. 26). The picture presented in this figure
reduces the problem to its barest essentials and is almost certainly
oversimplified. Forms that occurred earlier in the Pleistocene
(Nebraskan, Aftonian, and Kansan ages) cannot be accounted for,
and it is very likely that other, now extinct, species existed within
the time represented in this diagram. For example, Plecotus tetra-
lophodon lived perhaps as recently as late Wisconsin glacial age. It
was closely related to P. townsendii but probably was not ancestral
to it. P. alleganiensis probably lived as recently as the Sangamon
interglacial age. It was closely related to P. townsendi and P.
rafinesquit and may have been a direct ancestor of either of these
Recent species.
The Pleistocene epoch was characterized by an alternation of
periods of warmth and cold. During the warm interglacial ages,
forms such as the species of Plecotus conceivably could have been
distributed across the continent from coast to coast, provided trees
or caves were present. During glacial times distribution patterns
were shifted southward, contracted, and may have been split into
isolated segments as icecaps moved southward toward the Gulf of
Mexico and through the Rocky Mountain range. ‘The most southerly
advance of the ice brought it within 500 miles of the present Gulf
Coast. Adjacent to the ice front was a belt of treeless tundra of
unknown width. Faunas and floras were compressed southward
216 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
———
—_—-
—\_—_-
———
il
I
P _—__—_—_—_—_—
Figure 27.—Relationship of the present distribution of the subgenus Corynorhinus and the
maximum southward extension of Wisconsin glaciation. Plecotus townsendti, horizontal
shading; P. mexicanus and P. rafinesquit, vertical shading; southern limit of glaciers,
heavy line.
before the advance of the ice. Probably temperate climate inhabit-
ants found conditions least severe in the southwest and in the extreme
southeast, in the region of the Carolinas and Florida which was pro-
tected by the Appalachian Highlands from the winds that blew off
the icecaps during some phases of the glacial cycle. The Gulf Coastal
pathway south of the ice may have been less hospitable for these forms
inasmuch as it was unprotected from the ice chilled winds and had
rivers of meltwater flowing across it. Furthermore, competition for
its limited niches may have been acute.
Under these conditions, a population of Plecotus that may have
had a transcontinental distribution in the Yarmouth interglacial age,
might have been isolated into southeastern and southwestern seg-
ments during the ensuing Illinoian glacial age. The southwestern
segment included the mountains of northern and central Mexico in
its range.
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 217
With the retreat of the Illinoian icecap and the warming during
Sangamon time, Plecotus could have expanded its range again from
coast to coast and perhaps northward into Canada and Alaska if
caves were available. By this time the southwestern and south-
eastern segments had differentiated to the species level and remained
genetically distinct when their expanding ranges came into contact.
In the meantime, northward advance of warm climate floras and
faunas isolated the Plecotus of the Mexican mountains from the
remainder of the southwestern segment.
Southward advance of the Wisconsin icecaps and cooling climates
once again contracted the range of Plecotus and broke its wide, con-
tinuous distribution into several isolated segments, remnants of which
now occur in the southeastern lowlands, in the Appalachians, in the
Ozarks, and in southwestern North America. Contact was reestab-
lished between the southwestern segment and the Mexican segment
which had by this time diverged to the species level.
Withdrawal of the Wisconsin icesheets and amelioration of climate,
still proceeding, make it possible once more for the ranges of Plecotus
to expand. Plotting the present distribution of American Plecotus
on a map (fig. 27) showing the maximum southward extension of
Wisconsin glaciation lends emphasis to the probability that range
expansion has progressed slowly. The present distribution of Plecotus
probably bears considerable resemblance to its distribution in the
Wisconsin age. It is significant that, in the several thousand years
since the last glacial retreat, bats of several genera have moved north-
ward, far into the glaciated area, but Plecotus has barely penetrated
it. No sharp biotic division marks the drift border, and there is no
lack of caves north of the present range of Piecotus (caves in Wisconsin,
Pennsylvania, New England, and Ontario, for example) to prevent
its northward spread. To assume a relatively slow rate of dispersal
for Plecotus could explain its present pattern of distribution, and
furnish an important mechanism for speciation.
110
VOL.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM
218
¥ ¥ ¥ ¥
o-% 9 °9-€ 9 6°S-9°¢ L°9=4°¢
0% 9 8°¢ 9°¢
I T T I
0@ €°9 69 L°9
é z 4 z
0-0 ¢°9-4°9 LEL-Ouk 19-8 °9
0°0 ¢’9 c'L 0°9
F ¥ ¥ ¥
o-Z 9°9-€°9 0°9-9 9 L°g-G"9
0% 9°9 8°9 L°g
z 4 4 G
GZ § ‘9-29 T'9-0°9 L°¢-G'q
0% €°9 19 9°¢
T 4 T IT
rig ee 0°L-L°9
00 8°9 L'h 09
Yqsudy
xepuy Wy pvoiq q)3u9] AMOI 300}
dsno ;] hehe) eee 6 [27 B[ed4sog AICTPIXV JL
b 7
9°9-2'g Q°8-L'L
rs z'8
I I
rs 06
z G
6'S-9'g 16-26
Lg 9°6
5 ¥
9°S-£°9 8-18
rg £8
z z
9°9-9°g Z'6-8'8
9°g 06
T T
L°9 a)
qyydep yy pBerq
esto UyeIg
qipresq
Te} q10104 UJ
66-98
6 '6-4'8
6 OI-@ OT
¢ Or
GAPBe1q
OT} BULOZAT
T “21-0 ‘OT
891
SG
6 '8I-F'8I
L'8T
¥
@°L1-6 91
O°LT
o'LI-L ‘91
0°LT
0 ‘61-8 8ST
6'8T
300]
4soyeoly
SNe ay se hie hee gare ae =| S[BPNPTATPUT "ONT
aid drei te in SOLO TCT
tT aig ag 30 + ga a “-"93VIDA VY
(‘Aorg yodoH ‘vuryoO)
8NPLLND “*
SoULVI4X
RK ec. pe ae py re ene eee “-"9SCIIAY
(euozlIy)
sop hyd “gq
ile ee Oe Eee ee ae S[BNPIATPUT “ONT
REDE Ge Pa ke eS oe ~ $oUlo1 4x
Tet PRaep Saree Ee ies oe mere toe asBIIAV
("S".Q UW184S9, 4)
UWNIDINIDUL “AT
188 IAL
Sa te et eS soumladyx
Fo aca ne a e e Gocareie iae g OSVIDAV
(‘Ao1g qedoy ‘euyyO)
SNPIND *T
Bo re Ot a ak ean is hd SoUo.14 Xo
SD a irae aI TE SS ata oR ae aM OsBIOAV
(OdTX9 JT)
sijoppiyd *g
SSeS ae ae ees eg ea Soule} X iT
Faas De ee aS OSBIDAY
(‘SQ U403S9 MA)
UNIDINIDUL “AT
10[ BUI 7
snyline ‘gq pun ‘siyo][Ayd snyooo[g ‘unys[novM vullepny fo spuamainsnau 1]/NYS—' 1, AAV J,
219
AMERICAN BATS—-HANDLEY
ey ee a a ee a es ee a ot Ee
6I 9T ST 9T 9T 9T 91 ST OCR nicest bac See ga S[BNPIATPUL "ON,
o-T L°g-9'¢ 6°S-9°9 SP-LP LS-¥'G SL-EL F'E-Z'E S8-9'L Fa) Co Gee | nana a ae eee Sw soulelyX
eT gg 8g LY gg gL Sis: 08 i) CN te es ae ee ee CE ee ag oe OSVIIA VY
(esuel JO syred [[B Uy SetzI[e00'T)
OIVTL
9 7 ¥ if 4 ¥ 5 € C9 Garena gaan canes ere STBNPIATPUT "ONT
GT 8°S-9'9 sc-L'¢ 8 F-9'F L’S-#'¢ SL-9L FE-F' T8-6'2 SOT=6:0]. Uli ce see a ee ie ae, soUe.14X
oT “g sg Le gg jb? Ve 08 Qo |Saceeseenea=aacesek== eee = oe ees OBBIDAV
(a3uel
Jo sjzed [ye ur [oAoqe asoyy ydooxe] SetzI[200'T)
1g eg og og cg ce ag zg CCl wipes ceo ne eee S[W@NPTATPUT "ON,
oT 0°9-4'¢ o9-G'9 0'S-9'F 0°9-7°S SiL-E'2 9'8-2'S 9°8-8°2 6SI-OIPL) Ulf ok a ee eee somolyxq
61 Lg gg SF gg gL re 8 POU. |;sis css Sees eee aseloA
(ZN10819 A )
6 g g g ¢ g g ¢ 2 ers | ee ees S[BNPIATPUL "ONT
(Guat Lc-¥'s g°c-9'¢ 8't-9'F L°g-G°g Dele Gek ge-SE 8-08 (eit dberoe Genoa: Sreror Sas ee age SsoTMoI4X
6T 9°g 9g LY 9°¢ OL re 28 COW OAPs ena RET sag ae ~-"9SB10A VY
(oyenfeueny )
6 6 8 6 8 8 6 9 Gr WARES SSSeS oS ieee amas S[@NPIATPUT “ON
Go 33-9 6°9-9°S St-LF Lo-¥'9 T8-G°L ¥'E-2'E €°8-8°L GiGT=229 geen | eee aes aw eT soulel xy
0% “Lg g°¢ SF g°¢ 92 ee 08 C.O [uae gh ese ace. oe ea OSVIOA VY
(snqenyiTO)
soTVUlO Ty
qydep qypeeiq
xoput qypeeiq q4su0] 439] qypveq qypvo1q q43U9]
dsno ;] Teveled [7B [Vd4sog MOI 4400} Teqqio1eqzuy | oevur0ss7 4so}Bo1h)
AIVITXBIAL 9seo UlBIg
Bae ee a a ee SS Se eS Se
SnuBdIxeul snjooo][g fo syuawaunsnaw 1)NYG—s AAV],
110
vou.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM
220
eC er rr — nn —
ST iat II Or Or
6-% 69-6 '°S 9°9-3 "9 0°9-L°9 0°8-9°L
0% 09 e's 8°9 8°L
II 9 9 9 9
GG €°9-0°9 L° €°S-Z'9 09-8 °¢ 6°L-L°L
0% 19 a) o°g 6°9 8°L
176 la FI ra! FI
(Gx $'9-0'9 9°S-3'°9 T‘9-2°9 &'8-9'L
0% 19 €°9 69 6°L
bas Il ras II Il
Gs Z°9-9 9 MeO tY 0°9-2°9 0'8-F°L
0% 6°9 a9 6S Lok
OL 6 OT 8 L
o-G £°9-0'9 F'S-Z'¢ 0°9-2°9 0'8-L°2
0% 19 eo 6°¢ 6°L
qjsug] yydop qypeeiq
xoputr W4pBe1q AMOI 3004
dsno jJ 18388 [eqyeredysog | Areppyxeyy
OSs¥0 URI
S[VNPTATPUT *ON
Ane tye = eo eo ee gare somlodyx a
aaa Lara ta og eee a amen OSBIIAY
(oduvI JO syred [[e UT Sorii[e00 7)
unbsauyos “4 "gq
SOMO Xf
SRE ORT Te Sei ee ce OSBIOAV
(SpUBLMOT [B4SvOd OFJUeTIY)
S1YQOLIDUL “4
OBIT
(asuBd JO syed [[e UT soz}][Vo0’T)
unbsauyor *4"q
[eIWqIOIejUT | dYBUIOSAZ
SoUdalyX iy
SEUSS coe OG RV ES 3G EGRET SEE RTS BE OsBIDAV
(SPUBLMO] [BASBOd J[NH)
8170LIDUL “A
SOULOI4X A
a Sr ae rice y ar ae at ae came OsBIOAV
(Spuv[AO] [BysBOd OT}ULI1V )
S1YV0LIDU “4°
[BUT
-—-—-— rrr ee
IMbsouygel snyooo[q fo syuawmainspau 1]nYIJ—'6 LAV J,
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY
XOpul
dsno jJ
TOA 9,
6's
qypBeq
Teqered
IIL
T9265)
0°9
qq3u9]
jeveredysog
§°9-0'9
II
6 'S-6'F
eg
qySU9]
MOI 7}00}
ACTIX YL
L L
6 °S-L'9 €°8-0'8
g°¢ Z'8
er eI
6°S-4'S T'8-9°L
9°g 8'L
8 8
6°9-9'S 61-92
19 8'L
ia II
T'9-2°S $8-6'L
6's 1'8
OL or
6°9-9°g £'8-9'L
Lg 0's
a II
0°9-9'9 O°8-L°L
19 8°L
qidep qIpBoq
eseo UTBIG
L°8-4'&
9'€
I
L°€-G'S
g's
TIpBeq
[e11q1010} 0]
IT
8'8-7'8
9°8
}pveiq
dI}BULOSAZ
GEO T=2u0 lal | Seeeaeeaneaaemaennac oman SOUTOIYX GY
QO0 9 tees t aac anaes OSBIDAY
(IINOSsI PT PUB sesuByIY)
suabur'.
Sl vaee el ipeete ciao a aan STeNPTATPUT "ON
291-0 2G ial eaecnene mae ce teenage a cin oe SOULOIIX
G30 iid! | sera ce ee Soe gs oe ae OSBIDAY
(erMyBop
ueyy Joyo osuBI JO sqyred UT Sor}t[Voo’T)
81)D.19SND “2 *
G0 8 | RERaone SoS Saaeeccacnaee S[BNPIATPUT “ON
GEOTSOCC eae | Ginah bees sacar asaccaasnosees SOUT9I}X OL
be Pe aS eee ceae OSB1IOA VY
(eTIMqrog)
827D.198ND *}2 “I
OI BTL
it | pee eee Oae s[BnprArpuy "ON
Ce TROLO 1 Rea aaa ees SOTMOIYX
260 el | Geenicsaaesee ea aaeeeame cee OSBIOAV
(sesueyry)
suabur “2°
Qt.” _ | pees SSeS SS ass S[BNPyATpUT ‘ON
GEO [=a [ak | aeiaentee = aamemanaaa ceca SOULOI}X
Fay) - |PoReseeseeseeresbeecacs Saco OsBIIA VY
(e[Inyqeo9
uey} 1oyjO asuvi Jo syed UT sopqTvo0'y)
8yDIgSND "2 "J
Te | Gaaien eee S[BQPIATPUT "ON
SEAT ||P eeee cec eae SOUI9.I}X A
(Wye | RERRBS PSs seeeseceeeeeeectcnooy OSBIOAY
(BTTnyeoD)
§1]D1]8ND “2 "I
to BULA
43009]
480] BOLD
SUOBUL “4 ‘g pUD SITVIJSNB IIpussuMO} SNyOoI J fo szwawainsnawm jNYI—OL AIAV I,
110
VOL.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM
222
g ¥ € g 7 ¥ ¢ € CCE Polid an © eat ee ae ance S[BNPTATPUt “ON
1-0 0°9-6'S 1'9-0°9 € "9-19 8'o-F'9 Gisela 9848 6 ‘8-98 OGISICOL fg =o 7 ce eae eae soulel4yxq
20 09 19 €°¢ 9°g 6°L i 3 L'8 COs = liga ea ear arrears ODvIOAY
(vueju0 PY)
9 ¢ g g g g ¢ g a [ia er ASRS Be NIRS gC S[BNpTATPUT “ON
c-0 6 °S-9 °¢ 0°9-L°¢ 0°S-8 "PF L°S-¢'°g¢ 8°L-9'L 9 ‘8-8 °€ L'8-¥'8 CYR) Ea Abt) Se lal Ipanema Se oe eae Eo og soUlol4x
o'0 8°¢ 8°¢ 64 9°9 Le re c's GEG Tm. | gs ee ae wens nee meer ian OSCIOAV
(BUOZIIY U19q}1I0U pus [8.1]9D)
8 Z L 8 L Z L Z LA ks cake ar oaks oe een ea ee S[PNPTATpuUy “ON
1-0 L-SSPe9 T°9-9 °¢ 1 '°-8'P 8°S-F'¢ 0'8-¥'L 9 "-€'°E 9'8-F'8 EOC ial ekar arte ae ea RE. SoUldIIXG
o'0 9°¢ 8°¢ 0's e'¢ 9°L c's e'8 HT Sie an site ee aii et aed emesis, esvIIAV
(euozj1y Usay4jNog)
OBJ
Or Or Or Or Or OL or OT OL: weak ise sen a a ween ee oar ae S[BNPTATpUy “ON
1-0 @'9-6'S ¥'9-0'°9 CeeeTeg 0 ‘9-9 "9 f 8-8°2 8&4 'e €'6-9'°8 Se Ol=1- Ole 1) er ceaepes a aie eed oa nae Soulel}X
T0 09 69 €°¢ 8°9 0'8 9° 8°8 PO, lect ue vos a een eo: esvIIAV
(euezuo JAI)
9 z £ 9 g g g € Ga aeecpi RO OY Gel em a me S(eNplArpuUy “ON
TO 9°g-G'"¢ T ‘9-6 °S €°¢-6'P L°g-9'¢ 6 °L-9°L 9'€-9'e L'8-€'8 (HE ER ae iS eae ee SOULOIIX GT
£°0 9°¢ 0°9 1’ g°¢ igh ce ¢'8 (1G) Boh pea eae cae ta ee men ae eeaecter os OBB10AV
(euozITy U10q}10U 2 [v1qU9O)
¥ € I € € € € z Gis” SRS ESE SSS OTST Tk ESE SSE = S[BNPlATpuT ‘ON
0 ORO SE SCe wilt aes star T8=0:9 L°S-F'¢ 6°L-9°L L°e-9'€ 8 '8-€'8 CcSTHSr Oh as ees 38 Sas Re casas Ferra SOULILIX
¢'0 L’s 09 Tg gg 8°L 9°E 9°8 EEO ® oo marae coat aang nome aaa a Q3B1OAV
(suoz1y UoyyNOS)
:9[BU19,.7
q48u9] qidep qypeeiq
xopuy Wy peeiq qj suo MOI 4400} q1pBe1q qyperoiq yy sue
dsno {J 1238 [eq [e}eledisog Areyxeyy | OOOC~C~CO Ys TR IQAOIOJUT | OyvVULOsAZ, 480} Bely
esvo UlBig
susdSa][Vd IIpudasUMOY SNYODI|[Y fo spuamainspawm 1)NYY—T][ WIaV J,
223
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY
9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Oat dake aa beeen ta ls Rae ae S[BNPTAIPUT ‘ON
1-0 €°9-L°S T‘9-0°9 SeS=g 6 °S-L°¢ 0°8-9°L 6ne-228 8 ‘8-9 '8 CLOTS REG Le oll remains fe ean jan Se SOUI914X
£°0 T'9 09 £°9 8° 8°L 8°e L°8 T3i9 Tn | Ss ae a oe ane ees ca asBIIAY
(BTUTSITA )
snuniUib.101a "2°
GP €1 €1 ae €1 eI €1 €I {10 NaS | taco tas ea aaa S[VPNPIAIpUy ‘ON
1-0 29-6 'S € 9-09 ¥'G-Z'S 6°¢-9°¢ SiSaciee 6 °€-9 '€ 06-9 '8 8159) Tie Omi | carne aera ai a aeae oe eee SsoUlol4X
0°0 0°9 19 ag) 8°g 0'8 Lg 8°8 0:9 me | ene sien. @ ooeoegom te aoa OsBIOAV
(BUSTA 489)
SNUDUIb 110 “2°
ZL ZL L Z L 4 Ls 9 Ji pe MEN trea eee ee? tar see S[BNPIATPUTI "ON
2-0 f'9-L'S & 9-8 °¢ (ett 6 '¢-9°¢ GiSaLer: 6 '€-9'E 68-9 '8 F291 Ow | 2 aise Sa ae somle.1yx
9°0 09 T'9 ZG Lg 6°L se. yes CicO le ae ones ie a = eee ae esBIOAY
(W0S9I0Q 1.19489 \\)
HPUISUMO} “2 “TI
OTB TAL
& T I if I I I I Tie, Sott| Toe aces ae eane S[BNPIATPUT ‘ON
Dy a a I a a ee eee SoUlolyXx
£0 0°9 19 eg Lg 6°L 6'¢ 8°8 OL eT tS Sea SSeS OsvIIAY
(BTUTZITA )
SnUp1Uib11a 4"
0% II IT Or II ae Il 8 EDs SSS TSS eee S[GNplATPUI "ON
1-0 £°9-0'°9 v'9-0'9 ¥'G-Z'S 0'9-9'9 P'8-L‘L 6 '£-9'@ 16-88 OCZIRM OTe cass aeeeea coe aaa ee soulaiyxy
T0 19 a9 €¢ 8°¢ 1'8 se 06 OsOle. clans ca co os aS eee esBIIAV
(BTUTSITA 189A)
SnunUrb1ta “2
8 8 L 8 Z 8 8 ) CO) rea aa ape ees Borger et S[BNPTATpUy “ON,
1-0 £°9-0'9 ¥ 9-19 'S-1'9 69-99 Z'8-8°L 8"e-S "2g 26-88 6S O1-CNO le | Gea acca aed anata somal} xy
40 T'9 £9 £9 s°¢ 08 Le 06 OO euees aces eee ee omer o3t19A WV
(WOZUTYSe AA 7 WOZ01Q W194S9 A)
HpwasUNo? “2 “d
:e[vUe,T
q4su9] q3dep qypee1q
xepuy qi peoiq q4su0e[ MOI T4004 qi pve1q Yj pse1q q43u9]
dsno iJ Teqeled [sye[edysog ALOT [XV AL [@uqso1ojzuy | oeMO0sAZ 48o} Boy
eseo Ulelg
a a i ew ae a le
SNUBIUISIIA “4 “q PUD IIPUSSUMO}Y IIPUESUMO}Y SNyOde[g fo sjuawainspaw YNYG—ZI WAV,
497256—59——_9
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
224
I 9 g g Sj ¢ Gh Bola ae ee ae S[WNPIAIpUL “ON
eS go oa 0S-8F 9I-€1 F-6E OI-6 Sh-OF PEL=LOLRS| tp BOUT
OPE 6F Lal It Or LY OHE” a2. pee an eee asvIOAV
($7 10480 44)
UNIDINIDUL “iT
:O[B]AL
Sop ass ; ; ; Se oo 7 F A= 2-52 == BT ENpPIAIpULCON
sa ia oR % GP-S ‘IF LI-91 Go UC men Geen gee | ee oe(e SO0%=COL S| Se ae ee ee aa
Sea aes 6 IF BT Le per raat (Oo cor 7 apr eto tegen uaa
(-aorg yodoy “wuryp)
SNPUND “I
I Z I I Z I Tk "ooh cess Peres oe S[BNPIAIPUL ‘ON
ta ans ae VAL PeOab Vales pace cleats soa) OI Ola 8 |e ylang eagle cee oe re a ee sO Oy
G8z SPP [er] [ee] or 0g OM, Vrlcie seme heey esgad os CERROIN
(OdTx9J)
syonhiyd ‘gq
a 5 z Z 7 ¢ g Sos oo *S(SNPIAIpUION
se is id 1¢-8F iii L¥-LE ZI-O1 0S-LF HE EULESS sre OS ei ese Real
Se SS og GT ras II 6h TD lee aoe edo Ry,
('$° W419489 MA)
UNIDINIDUL “AT
a] BULA]
asuvdxa yysue] yysuey yoyou avid Y43ud]
BULAN wWIvIIOT SuUBBIT, WOlj Ie | JOOS purpT | -99410A [IV], [BIOL
snyline ‘gq pup ‘siyo[Ayd snyoo9[g ‘UIN}e[NIVW BUJepNy fo spuawmainspau [DULIIT—§E]T AIAV J,
225
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY
ie i RE Fn ee eee eS EE
aa aa-=--=-- p - F ardet cumiete eels F i 10G 97 7995 2 Se SRR PLATPUL LON
Si SSRIS 8 ‘1P-Z ‘OF Dior eye Cees Wie acura gaa 1¢-9F C0I-46°- | ee teulons xa
a ‘If LI Le ar ear 6F (CTE Sp TENS
(Aoig yodoy “euryo)
SNJLUND “q
aoes55----- I I ir T I i ToTe sees ess <"-sPenprarpur "ON
ea ee ea eh i ee ee a ee aaa SOUIIFXY
a ae CG OF OI OF EE GS StT Cite Ang oo on npe map eee
(BuoztIIy)
syopjhyd -q
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
226
IO SI LI SI SI €1 €T ooo ees <<“ STBNPIATPUE “ON
pew iie tas I ‘&b-L ‘6 CI-II Ge-6 11-6 OS-eF DOTS CO. es are ee
BRIS igi 0 ‘1? ral Zs Or 9F 96 Vil Cee ase. coy © te RDO U Ley,
(esuBl Jo sjred [[B UL SorzITBoO'T)
-3[81N
SES SSSSore 9 I a ¢ c ¢ oo eee STBNPIAIpUrL “ON
Sa rae ZSb-L ‘0b |---| ee €1-6 OS-IF GOSGGT Fy ers 8 05 et erat
a a b Ot eT rE II cr c6 FOO IS whey one 2 ok Coe eS BIOAY
(esusr Jo szzed
II3 Ur [aAoqe osoy} ydeoxe] serzI]B00'T)
SOS OGIO SS= CF CH CP eh Gi €F eee S[BUPIATpUr “ON,
oo a aes © FEF ‘OF 21-11 Fe-1E OI-O1 IS-&h COL=O0. sie a) ea enon, Meee
Pasosss- Ss FCP ae gE OT 8F 86 ieee ame Tie caro ae SPICE CYNE
(ZN19B10 A )
Se =~————- OL Ol OI Mele ee tele alte Cee eon bee alee eee oe ae ee ELON TOLER
oe gee es €-er-L OF | [THT] (OSI IOSIA s | Aesemeten al grea wee. ic far ee See heme pine ake Geet mee Un a
Sree sss € ‘GF [21] [ze] pr irate Sal gi Sarit” eee a Vana ie ee mm ear MCL)
(oyen{sueny)
ees ee 6 apa a la ey a 6 6 6 oo eee sTBnprarpul "ON
Baia ora CeGp-CaGealy a2 085 ce ales ee Sk 1S-9F SOLSCG. as ian mes oes Se umes
~-------- ee 0 ZF Sere oe ee SSS ZI SF 66 oe a eee SS iene eae OOR LOAN,
(enqenylyD)
:o[BUlI J
esuvdxoa Y}SU9] qysu9] yoyou aB1q ysue]
BUI UBIO J SnSBl], Wolj ey | Joos purp_ | -0310A [Tey [810.L
SNUBOIXOU SNYOI[ J fo syuawmainspaw JOULIIZY—FI AAV,
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY
P
LLE-G9S
ELE
662-026
186
082-026
G1]
esuvdxo
SUI
—"!
9T
8 FP-1 IP
0 "EP
€ GP
8 ‘SF-T “SP
rl
6 TP
0 EF
q33u9]
WIGIIO T
9T-3I
ial
43309]
snse1y,
VE-GE
9E-GE
ve
yojou
wWOdy IV
400} pulpy
aeiq
-9JI9A [IGT
90T-T16
io oni olga a eg Sa akg a SOULIIYXY
amare tink care otk bar iar a IBVIIAY
(esuBl Jo sjied [[B UL Sor}ITBI0'T)
wnbsauyps *4 “gq
ae ig ai lari et ica a SOTIIYXY
Po pee ee ioe aioe 1 IDBIOAY
(SpuB[MO] [B}SBOO JTJURIY)
$1J0LIDUL *L “q
O18]
Sa eee a a ae et SsoWol XA
Pt BEI PI BA a OBBIOAY
(esuvi Jo syed [[B Ul Sat}ITBIO'T)
anbsauypnr *L “J
SESS SE reo eos 5 ceesaean or SOWIII}XY
oS SF Ss se ae Oe IBBVIIAY
(SpuBL MOT [B}SBOD J[N4)
SUOLIDUL *L *q
Fe ee a SOUWIIPX
SoS ee pee oa nr eens cig IBVIIAY
(Spuv[ MOT [24S8B09 OTYULIV)
SUOLIDU *L “I
:O[BUlI FT
Iinbsouygel snyooo[g fo sjuawmainspaw Jpulajxgq—G[ Gav],
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
228
eee ae 8
Se Lr oes SvevaanOPs| seaaal
ee tt eee FGF Sse tee seo.
I Or Or
areca | 9 Lvl SV 9T-F1
SSE Gov cI
eee ay cI vI
SS eaeaacles nails T ‘St-0 GP Siu
nS acer 9 ‘SP ST
Seceeeekees II een sersome s
Rees re Vitis GaOGle 2000s 0 on
seeSsoasen 8 ‘CF SH SeReBeone
asuedxa yysue] yySud]
SUILM WIve10 J SuSBLY,
yoyou
WOIJ TUG
EG
1-8
300} puly
L
€S-IP
ov
6F-EP
aviq
-OJIVA [IBY
00T-Z6
£01-S6
a la SOUTOI4 XA
--------------------- IdBIOAY
(e[INYwoD)
S2]D1]SND *} “dq
a)
woot r eo e---- SOULIDIFXY
--------------------- ISBIOAY
(SesuByIy )
suahur yd
ROG St Sa See SS ase SOUIdI} XY
Sac ae aah oc te a IBBIOAY
(e[INYyBoD ueyy
I9qjO osuBi Jo syivd Ul SorzI[BIO'T)
SUDLISND “2 “I
eae ae Pin pe ee S[BNPIAIpUl “ON
ae Se ee ee SOULIIY XA
SIR IBVIOAY
(eyInyBoD)
SUDLISND “7 “I
Lo[BUld
SUOSUL “4 ‘gg puD SI[BIjSNB IpuasuUMO} SNYOIe[T fo syuswainspaw Jousaxy—'Q[ AIAV J,
229
AMERICAN BATS—-HANDLEY
G ‘Vt-F 6E
Ob * slseseee ees S[@NPIAIPUT “ON
PADIS ih al iG ae Sa SOM I4 XA
CG. altecmce = apa ee eee IDBIODAY
(IINOSST}, PUB SvsUBYIY)
suabut 1 “qd
> , eg oe a ee S[GNPIATpUr “ON
TE OTST a ea SOULIIPX GY
UGE eid: igceat ha © qin ar: Be a ISBIDAY
(BlINyBoDH uByy
Jey}O aBuvr Jo sued Ul SolzITBI0T)
SUDLISND "2 “_q
110
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM Von.
230
OT
0ZE-866
60
G
OTE-ZOE
90€
esuedxa
BUI
8 ¢
G Sh-T ‘OF LI-GT
OFTy. GT
L OP
T '€7
43 8u9]
W1Ival0 7
yysue]
snae1y,
9E-ZE
yojou
WOIj JETT
LIi-6
{ica}
300} pulyy
CS-SP
Oc-Ar
aviq
-OJI9A [IVT
601-06
Or
OTT-€0T
LOT
SOUIIIYX |
----------------------- IsBIBAY
(euOoZzIIY Uley}Nog)
A) aN
SOULIIYXY
raed Sar iat see ee IDVIOAY
(wuByuoy,)
SsowalyXy
WE Ge ae a ee eae IBVIOAY
(SUOZIIY Uley}ION ® [v1yUID)
SOWOI4XH
~---------------------- adVIOAY
(suozIIy UIoYNOg)
:oyeway
Susosay[ed NpuasuMmo}y snyooo[g fo syuawainspam Jousajrgy—)] HIAV J,
231
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY
a
T18-SOE
L0E
I VP
8 TF
II-6
VS-LY
g
OTI-SOT
801
Fnac ei eae a ee SOULIIY XG
ea am a tae ager 9 ISBIOAY
(sue, UOPL)
aes Ges ao Sh aoe SOUIBIPAG
a alo ta ert pt te OS OdVIOAY
(BUOZIIY Uloyj10U A [B1}UID)
Reet Vy \Wtecess ots I 4 8 it Aliceuewcetpeoys S[enprArpul “ON
Be Lam wated al CEC VaOwt 4 | hae se] |/oeoo~—~ oa II-01 1S-$Y SOL-Go. Wis ee SOUIAI4X
oer GEE. heoeas- 5] 08 IT OF oo1 BS ROA EIO AN
(UWOBIIQ, U19489 AA )
wpuasumo} "} ‘qd
ss - 3G
5 a Se
Fh cele mains OP gees I 1 I |e eee cee aia s[BNplATpul ‘ON
5 ; CEO PECE OTA erar sori ae ee or a ee lee a eae SOUL XG
ep oo Ce Ose ala esas 8E II cr G01 Se a eee reel AY,
a (BIUISILA )
Z SNUDIUWLU *} “I
=
= & PI i 6 OL OT Oe tomer iam oy coe ae s[enprAlpul "ON
LACAUIS eae 2 So 6E-FE SI-IT PS—OF GICs Ay hwicats at one eee Soulat]™
s OI 8 oF GI ce ral 6F 10) GO Ni a ai cadence anon on Gale aBBIOAY
a (BIUISITA 989,\\)
fe, snupiuibiia “} “dd
>) ees
“a irk ee ee a cee ea 6 g OT OH el to eee es S[enpralpul “ON
a a Lay GeV a 8 on a 9E-0E oI-IT €9-9F AVION. [o> 5 RT ES sotmedy xX
ae aot. Scere Mire an er ts ral 8F LOD =, “lie peirets ciaae tere se osBloAy
a (MoySUTYySeEM 2 UOSAIQ U1e4sSo 4)
S Upussuno} *} ‘d
Sy OTB]
esuvdxa yysue] yysue] yojou aeiq yysue]
SUILM W1B910 J SUSBLL, wo ieq | yooy pulfy | -eW0A [IBY [8JOL,
ee ee ee
SNUBIUIZIIA “4 ‘gq PUD IIPUGSUMO} ITpUGSUMO} SNYODT fO Spuawasnspau JDULI}ITY — SBT ATAVL
233
BATS—HANDLEY
AMERICAN
G
SIE-1€
€I€
G
FIE—00E
LOE
9 EP
8€
¥ 9-1 SP
9 FF
€
Si-
Lal
GG
8é-1é
ve
éI-IT
GS-OF
oS-8P
TOT-—26
€0I-86
TOT
(BIUIDITA )
snupiurbsra “2 “q
SoUlOIYXY
--------------------- ddRIODAY
(BIUISITA 389 AA)
SnuniUrb.iid *} “_q
234 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM vou. 116
Bibliography
Aucock, N. H., aNnp Morrat, C. B.
1901. The natural history of Irish bats. The long-eared bat, Plecotus
auritus, Linnaeus. Irish Nat., vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 241-251.
Acorn, J. R.
1944. Notes on the winter occurrence of bats in Nevada. Journ. Mamm.,
vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 308-310.
AULEN, G. M.
1916. Bats of the genus Corynorhinus. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., vol. 60,
no. 9, pp. 331-358, 1 pl.
1939. Bats. x+368 pp., illus.
ALLEN, H.
1864. Monograph of the bats of North America. Smithsonian Mise. Coll.,
vol. 7, art. 1 (publ. 165), xxiv-+85 pp., 68 figs.
1865. On a new genus of Vespertilionidae. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila-
delphia, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 173-175.
1892. A new genus of Vespertilionidae. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia
(1891), vol. 48, pt. 3, pp. 467-470.
1894. A monograph of the bats of North America. U.S. Nat. Mus. Bull.
43, x +198 pp., 38 pls., 1893.
ALLEN, J. A.
1881. List of mammals collected by Dr. Edward Palmer in northeastern
Mexico, with field-notes by the collector. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool.,
vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 183-189.
1890. Notes on collections of mammals made in central and southern
Mexico .... Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 3, no. 1, pp.
175-194.
1891. Description of a new species of big-eared bat, of the genus Histiotus,
from southern California. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 3,
no. 2, pp. 195-198.
AMADON, D.
1953. Migratory birds of relict distribution: Some inferences. Auk, vol.
70, no. 4, pp. 461-469.
ANDERSEN, K.
1908. A monograph of the chiropteran genera Uroderma, Enchisthenes, and
Artibeus. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, pp. 204-319, figs. 40-59.
ANDERSON, R. M.
1947. Catalogue of Canadian Recent mammals. Bull. Nat. Mus. Canada
(1946), no. 102, vi+238 pp.
AntHony, H. E.
1918. The indigenous land mammals of Porto Rico, living and extinct.
Mem. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., new ser., vol. 2, pt. 2, pp. 329-435,
pls. 55-74, 55 figs.
1923. Mammals from Mexico and South America. Amer. Mus. Nov., no.
54, 10 pp.
Asucrart, G. P.
1932. A third record of the spotted bat (Huderma maculata) for California.
Journ. Mamm., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 162-163.
BalILry, V.
1930. Animal life of Yellowstone National Park. xiv-+241 pp., 70 figs.
1931. Mammals of New Mexico. North Amer. Fauna, no. 53, 412 pp., 22
pls., 58 figs.
AMERICAN BATS—HANDLEY 235
1936. The mammals and life zones of Oregon. North Amer. Fauna, no.
55, 416 pp., 52 pls., 102 figs., map.
Baker, R. H.
1956. Mammals of Coahuila, México. Univ. Kansas Pub]. Mus. Nat.
Hist., vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 125-335, 75 figs.
Barsoour, R. W.
195la. A preliminary list of the mammals of Preston County, West Virginia.
Proc. West Virginia Acad. Sci. (1950), vol. 22, pp. 48-53.
1951b. Notes on mammals from West Virginia. Journ. Mamm., vol. 32,
no. 3, pp. 368-371.
1957. Some additional mammal records from Kentucky. Journ. Mamm.,
vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 140-141.
BarReETT-Hami.ttTon, G. E. H.
1910-1911. A history of British mammals. Vol. 1, xvi+263 pp., illus.
Becustein, J. M.
1800. Translation of Thomas Pennant’s ‘‘Allgemeine Uebersicht der
vierfussigen Thiere.’”’ Vol. 2, pp. i-xii-+323-668.
Bemr, J. R., anp Ricwarps, A. G.
1956. Hibernation of the big brown bat. Journ. Mamm., vol. 37, no. 1,
pp. 31-41, 1 pl., 2 figs.
Benson, S. B.
1954. Records of the spotted bat (Huderma maculata) from California and
Utah. Journ. Mamm., vol. 35, no. 1, p. 117.
Buack, J. D.
1936. Mammals of northwestern Arkansas. Journ. Mamm., vol. 17, no.
1, pp. 29-35.
Buarr, W. F.
1939. Faunal relationships and geographic distribution of mammals in
Oklahoma. Amer. Midl. Nat., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 85-133, 1 fig.
1952. Bats of the Edwards Plateau in central Texas. Texas Journ. Sci.,
vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 95-98.
1954. Mammals of the Mesquite Plains Biotic District in Texas and Okla-
homa, and speciation in the central grasslands. Texas Journ. Sci.,
vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 235-264, 1 fig.
Buarr, W. F., ano Miuuer, C. E., JR.
1949. The mammals of the Sierra Vieja region, southwestern Texas, with
remarks on the biogeographic position of the region. Texas Journ.
Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 67-92.
Boots, E. S.
1945. Corynorhinus in northeastern Oregon. Murrelet, vol. 26, no. 2, p. 26.
BoreEuu, A. E., anp Bryant, M. D.
1942. Mammals of the Big Bend area of Texas. Univ. California Publ.
Zool., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 1-62, 5 pls., 1 fig.
BrIM.eEy, C. S.
1905. )
. Beak in dorsal view attenuate from antennal insertion to epicel finde Feo
Beak in dorsal view nearly parallel-sided from antennal insertion to apex
(Mexico). . . . . . . . latitator, new species (p. 317)
Antennae yellowish: inserted a distance from eye slightly less than width of
frons; dorsal surface of beak clothed with scales coarser, shorter, and whiter
than pies on dorsal surface of prothorax, intervals in part with two rows
of punctures (San Luis Potosf and Puebla). innocens, new species (p. 314)
Antennae dark, inserted at distance from eye slightly greater than width of
frons; dorsal surface of beak clothed with scales similar to those on dorsal
surface of prothorax; intervals with one row of punctures (Guatemala,
British Honduras). . . ... . . brachycephalum Wagner (p. 310)
First segment of tarsus 1 elonzate. four times as long as wide (Michoacd4n,
Ruebla) a ee . . . mirandum, new species (p. 318)
First segment phe ae ploneata: 6k’ nc MFS igsle BPs al. ceetspass hiethctastga, A
Tarsus 1 with first segment with inner margin strongly rounded from base to
apex, forming a broad, rounded lobe projecting distally beyond apex of
segment, from above inner pers of segment much broader than outer
half (Veracruz)... . . . mirificum, new species (p. 319)
Tarsus | with first eeement. not so iredsaed. Sh sy We cee ee ie mead epee
Front femur distinctly swollen, antennae inserted at basal fourth of beak, at
distance from eye equal to width of frons (Michoac4én).
caenum, new species (p. 312)
Hrontwemurmot swolleni=.cepee es oo us Gee) eee ea Gees css ee HG
First segment of tarsus 3 with inner angle produced into a short spine (Vera-
cruz, Panama) .......... .. . sancti-felicis Sharp (p. 320)
PP ATSUS{O SIMD lCysyci iss) ha las ial Je ge, ve eva ame iat cae et es, ees
Antennae inserted at not more than basal third of he aoe : iene 8
Antennae inserted just behind middle of beak, yellowish; eal strongly
deflexed at middle (Arizona)... . . . . brunnicornis Fall (p. 3238)
Beak shorter than prothorax, stout; size greater than 3.5 mm. (Puebla).
bettyae, new species (p. 263)
Beak longer than prothorax, slender; sizelessthan2.8mm....... 19
254 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
Antennae inserted at basal fifth of beak, at distance from eye equal to width
of frons (San Luis Potos{, Morelos). . . innocuum, new species (p. 315)
Antennae inserted at basal third of beak, at distance from eye twice width
of frons ...°. 20
Beak in lateral view attenuate Age cence mention to oer (Arizona).
eccentricum Fall (p. 324)
Beak in lateral view nearly parallel beyond antennal insertion (Puebla,
México, Morelos; Guatemala) . . . . punctulirostre Sharp (p. 325)
Fifth ventral segment with lateral apical angles produced into a pair of trian-
gular processes projecting posteriorly slightly beyond tips of elytra (Tres
Marfas Island, Mexico) . . . . . . acanenicum, new species (p. 282)
Fifth ventral segment not so medinedl: Sefer ay oe ; F a 77°
Front tibia more or less flattened on inner surface, this area Fee of scales,
generally polished and noticeably striate; ne generally inserted at
distance from eye less than width of frons. . ........... 32
Front:tibia not so modified... 4. Ye sae eth ed ice ea
First segment of tarsus 1 with outer apical ek produced intoaspine. . 24
First segment of tarsus 1 simple. . .. . Sige duh fd sb tayf ev col has eles ee
Size about 2.0 mm.; elytral intervals with two rows of scales which are coarse
and pearly in solon on basal margin of elytra and along basal third of suture;
laterally and posteriorly coarse scales are bounded by a region of very fine,
yellowish scales; elytra in posterior half and area lateral of interval 5
clothed with white, hairlike scales; tibiae yellowish (Guatemala).
calcaratipes Sharp (p. 312)
Size less than 1.5 mm., elytral intervals with one row of uniform, fine scales;
tibiae nearly: blackat.ius 2 RU a) Be ats, 02S es
Spine on outer angle of first segment of tarsus 1 large, triangular in shape, as
long as tarsal segment is wide at apex (Brazil, Nicaragua).
spinitarse Wagner (p. 321)
Spine on outer angle of first segment of tarsus 1 small, shorter than width of
tarsal segment (Veracruz, Puebla). . . . emoplus, new species (p. 314)
Tibia 1 with a short, flat area less than one-third its length, not or very
slightly striate (New York-Florida-Texas-W yoming).
sayi Gyllenhal (p. 306)
Tibia 1 with flat or concave area extending about one-half its length. . 27
Flat area on tibia 1 extremely densely and finely striate so that the area
appears irridescent, individual striae not discernible. ...... 28
Flat area on tibia 1 with coarser, distinct, well separated striae, not irri-
descents US tate vie wy Hs ee Omi teem Ee ches Ashe, US mae
Tibial mucrones projecting in line with feild axis of tibiae; beak strongly
attenuate toward apex (Nebraska, Colorado, Oklahoma).
nebraskense Fall (p. 301).
Tibial mucrones projecting at an angle with long axis of tibiae; beak slightly
attenuate toward apex (District of Columbia, Tennessee).
novellum Fall (p. 303)
Tibia 1 straight in anterior view... . 30
Tibia 1 deflexed at apical two-fifths in arteien view (Mexico: Guatemala
godmani Wagner (p. 297)
Beak in dorsal view distinctly expanded at apex (Guatemala; Puebla, México,
Distrito Federal)... .. . . .aurichalceum Wagner (p. 296)
Beak in dorsal view cylindrical a peer Ie eae 2 6 US ee eT
31.
32.
33.
34,
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
SUBGENUS TRICHAPION—KISSINGER 255
Size about 1.6 mm.; metasternum comparatively coarsely, sparsely punc-
tured; tibial mucrones fine, curved (Pueblo, México, Distrito Federal).
parcum, new species (p. 305)
Size about 2.0 mm.; metasternum comparatively finely, densely punctured;
tibial mucrones Bante eras shanliet = Oe
Elytra not aeneous, pubescence Bonny ee Antennal ep pearly three times
as long as wide, covered with very sparse, long, suberect setae and shorter,
more abundant, decumbent setae (Arizona, New Mexico).
oriotes, new species (p. 304)
Elytra moderately aeneous, pubescence on dorsal surface with faint yellowish
cast, white laterally; antennal club slightly more than twice as long as
wide, covered with nearly uniform, long, suberect setae (New York-
Florida, Alabama). ..... . . .griseum Smith (p. 300)
Antennae inserted at distance han ee eee than width of frons; dorsal
pubescence squamiform (Texas, México) . . propinquicorne Fall (p. 277)
Antennae inserted at distance from eye not less than width of frons. . 34
Prothorax much wider at middle than base, sides greatly rounded. . . 35
Prothorax at middle at most ime wider than ee sides not greatly
TOUNGEG! 57 ouis Henne Saher ade sae! VO
Elytral intervals SreouehaT convex; tibia 1 dilated: curved, bearing long,
yellowish pubescence on inner surface (Puebla, Distrito Federal, Micho-
acén, Guerrero). . . . . . heterogeneum Sharp (p. 372)
Elytral intervals Slichtlyic convex; TonRe 1 dilated (New Hampshire—Georgia,
Louisiana, Iowa, Wisconsin) . . . .nigrum Herbst (p. 376)
Antennae inserted at about the ails of tis beak, scape longer than next
five antennal segments (Chile) . . .meorrhynchum Philippi (p. 275)
Antennae inserted distinctly behind middle of: beak’... i.) PA ae FO
Antennae inserted at distance from eye equal to or Slightly renee than
widthoffrons. .. . ie Taaaywi os
Antennae inserted at dictanes from eye ‘distinctly Grentar nena or more)
than width of frons. ... SF fice OL
Pubescence of dorsal surface penerallsy pont icistral paieeale with one row
of fine scales... . a aCe ae,
Pubescence of dorsal pte Conan icnone! eivinel iteavale with two rows of
fiNGu BOALCRU corals cualer toques eaten te berieriae bit OME od CE CNN Uae
Mucrones dentate... . NORGE cee anvil on cbarhions 140
Mucrones simple, at most pibenecinte Seta Boca ee es sepettcaase (40
Frons about as wide as dorsal tip of beak, appearing fagaloete: prothorax
basal margin strongly expanded (?Arizona) . . . grossulum Fall (p. 269)
Frons wider than dorsal tip of beak (or elytra red), not trisuleate; prothorax
basal margin at most) slightly expandeds:..5.....:) ....0. #2... Al
EB lytEa red sw OrotlOrax DIACK acs qo. so -e18 1 eo ch pay ee tysy. formate Gdiieeebe legs Ee
HKlytra and prothorax black. ... . Mine eet 4a
Beak as long as head and prothorax pombined= Pinheras anely punctured,
nearly glabrous; dorsal surface of elytra not at all striate; prothorax not
constricted apically (Veracruz, Tabasco, Guerrero; British Honduras;
Guatemala; Nicaragua; Panama; Colombia; Venezuela; Brazil).
rufipenne Gyllenhal (p. 346)
Beak shorter than head and prothorax combined; prothorax with rather
coarse, deep punctures which bear hairlike setae; striae adjacent to suture
distinctly impressed throughout; prothorax distinctly constricted at apex
(Tamaulipas, San Luis Potosf). . . . . . evustum, new species (p. 337)
256 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
52.
53.
or
i
Abdomen and metasternum finely, sparsely punctate. ....... 44
Abdomen and metasternum coarsely, closely, deeply punctate. . ... 45
In dorsal view beak not expanded over antennal insertion; beak distinctly
shorter than head and prothorax combined (New England—Florida—Texas—
Wisconsin) ... . . . patruele Smith (p. 341)
In dorsal view beak cintinety eeaenied over antennal insertion; beak about
as long as head and prothorax combined (Peru; Amazonas).
nitidum Kirsch (p. 341)
Mucrones moderately long, slender; elytral intervals not much wider than
striae (California, Arizona). . .. .. . . abdominale Smith (p. 333)
Mucrones short, blunt; elytral intervals nearly twice as wide as striae (Colo-
rado, Idaho, Montana; British Columbia, Alberta, Hudson Bay Territory).
centrale Fall (p. 335)
Beak about as long as prothorax (Illinois, Nebraska, Colorado, Arizona).
modestum Smith (p. 276)
Beak distinctly longer than prothorax. .. . Faerie Ch
Prothorax slightly wider at middle than base; civtsal iter ae eironale convex,
slightly wider than striae (Massachusetts—Tennessee—Texas—Iowa).
porcatum Boheman (p. 344)
Prothorax at middle not wider than base; elytral intervals at most slightly
convex, at least one-half wider than striae. .. . pieces), eis)
Elytra at humeri at least two-fifths wider than Sratnorae a base; elytra
more than two and three-fourths times as long as prothorax. . .. 49
Elytra at humeri one-third wider than prothorax at base; elytra less than two
and three-fourths times as long as prothorax. . . . Bares) te, | OH)
In lateral view dorsal surface of head above eyes distinetly declivitous
(Tamaulipas). . . ; . . . nanulum, new species (p. 357)
In lateral view dorsal purines of endl is flat from eyesto base. .... 50
Elytral intervals convex (Tabasco; British Honduras; Guatemala).
oscillator Sharp (p. 359)
Elytral intervals flat. . ... ee ROL
. Pubescence on side of aaiLOrae aii as coarse as a that c on ‘dorsal surface or
midline wan eae pao ha 52
Pubescence on side lof prathoras BRAG twice as coarse as that on dorsal sur-
face; in dorsal view beak strongly expanded over antennal insertion (Ta-
pacco: Guatemala; Nicaragua). . . . .. mamaguense Wagner (p. 354)
Prothorax with uniform, sparse pubescence on dorsal surface . .... 53
Prothorax with scales along median line coarser than those on lateral portion
of dorsal surface... . se Oe
Prothorax sparsely, finely, shallowly, manotured: dows ay aad daterater eyes
acutely prominent; scales in elytral striae minute, not larger than those
on intervals (Tamaulipas). . . . . . subsequens, new species (p. 364)
Prothorax moderately densely, finely, deeply punctured; eyes more rounded;
scales in elytral striae distinctly larger than those on intervals (Ontario;
New York, Virginia, Tennessee, Texas, Kansas, Iowa, Michigan).
reconditum Gyllenhal (p. 361)
Beak slightly shorter than head and prothorax combined; prothorax more
deeply, uniformly punctured (Texas, Tamaulipas).
subtinctum Fall (p. 365)
Beak slightly longer than head and prothorax combined; prothorax more
shallowly, irregularly punctured (Guatemala). subrufum Sharp (p. 363)
55.
56.
57.
58.
60.
61.
62.
64.
SUBGENUS TRICHAPION—KISSINGER 257
Mucrones minute; dorsal margin of antennal scrobe evenly descending to
below eye (Florida)... .. . « .pervicax Fall (p. 360)
Mucrones larger; dorsal margin of lantennan sorebe somewhat angulate above
antennal insertion .. . {ieyia., 56
Mucrones short, subangulate (New. Teer Florida, Mieseeiap? Indiana).
perforicolJe Fall (p. 343)
Mucrones long, simple (Georgia, Florida, Mississippi).
importunum Fail (p. 353)
Pubescence noticeably denser at base of elytral interval 3; size generally less
thanl.6@mm.... Anchen meen earn n eae Uha te:
Pubescence on elytra nado size Core ant le a MMe Psa es eS 4D
Mucrones projecting at an angle with tibiae; elytral intervals nearly flat
(Guerrero; Guatemala) .... . . . perpilosum Wagner (p. 329)
Mucrones in basal half projecting in ane with long axis of tibiae; apical half
curved out laterally; elytral intervals moderately convex (@abaees: Guate-
mala; Panama). . . . . . auriferum Wagner (p. 327)
Frovs wider than dorsal ip on Bente nor sulcate; prothorax at base one-fifth
wider than long; elytral intervals moderately convex; size 1.6 to 2.0 mm.
(Arizona; Baja California, Chihuahua, Guerrero). aequabile Fall (p. 259)
Frons as wide as dorsal tip of beak, with shallow median depression; pro-
thorax at base one-third wider than ss elytral intervals nearly flat; size
greater than 2.1 mm... . SH eeart 260
Middle and hind tibiae with siunjlar’ mucrones, ‘both soutely, angulate ven-
trally (Guerrero; Guatemala). . . . . . . . imitator Wagner (p. 286)
Middle tibia with a short, acutely angulate mucro, hind tibia with long,
slender, straight mucro projecting at about 120° from tibia (Distrito
Hederal)s ss 4: . . . . plectrocolum, new species (p. 288)
Beak as long or longen tana head and prothorax combined. ..... 62
Beak distinctly shorter than head and prothorax combined. . . . . . 67
Antennae inserted at distance from eye four times as great as width of frons;
beak one-fourth longer than head and prothorax; mucro 2 short, subangu-
late; mucro 3 long, curved; size 2.25 to 2.50 mm. (Puebla, Michoacdn,
Guerrero; Guatemala; Honduras) . . . . . gracilirostre Sharp (p. 352)
Antennae inserted at distance from eye not more than twice as great as
width of frons; beak at most slightly longer than head and prothorax
Combimnedaar cise Sh 2auew eae COS
. Size 2.5 to 3.0 mm.; “egal terse ecient as Stone as Eide) not longer than
lobes of third segment (New Hampshire, Florida, Texas, Wisconsin).
rostrum Say (p. 384)
Size generally less than 2.5 mm.; second tarsal segment longer than wide,
longer than lobes of third segment. . ... . gan SER A
Head excavated and polished ventrally; elytral airine ‘shallow; mucrones
minute (Florida; Tamaulipas). . . . . . . gulare Fall (p. 338)
Head not excavated ventrally; elytral striae dean: mucrones larger. . . 65
5. Elytra strongly bronzed, intervals polished, nearly impunctate, elytral pubes-
cence nearly lacking, scales in striae larger than those on intervals (Guate-
mala; Honduras; Colombia; Venezuela; Bolivia).
bicolor Gerstaecker (p. 350)
Elytra black, not bronzed, intervals with more or less distinct transverse
minute rugae, intervals with distinct punctures bearing conspicuous scales
as largeras thosedmesttides, . .. . 4 < ).< » # «6 2 2 2 « @ 9 OG
258 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL, 110
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
Apex of prothorax distinctly constricted; beak slightly punctured beyond
middle (México, Distrito Federal) . . . . . mexicanum Wagner (p. 383)
Apex of prothorax slightly constricted; beak strongly punctured in rows, tip
smoother (Illinois, Kansas, Colorado) . . . . .coloradense Fall (p. 378)
Mucrones simple. . . . hat eR a arr LRT ASU eee
Mucrones dentate or sarees Seyitaniie ee er ere ee me fC)
Size 1.5 mm.; dorsal surface of prothorax deeply, closely, coarsely punctured
(Iowa, ne iceratig Kansas) . . . . . .minor Smith (p. 355)
Size generally larger than 1.8 mm.; Prioreal aie of prothorax more shallowly
muncbtired sc. '0 i ee oe a
Antennae inserted at basal two-fifths of beak; beak in dorsal view nearly
parallel-sided; prothorax little wider at base than apex (holarctic; North
Carolina to New England, west to Washington, south to Utah).
simile Kirby (p. 278)
Antennae inserted at basal third of beak; in dorsal view beak attenuate
toward apex; apex of prothorax seven-tenths as wide as base (Guerrero;
Guatemala). .......... .. .hadromerum Wagner (p. 328)
Beak shorter and stout, at most slightly longer than prothorax, in lateral
view attenuating to apex, more or less suleate laterally; frons not wider
than dorsal tip of beak. . ... oc eneeel fe a ee
Beak more slender and subparallel apically: Pieuincie fonees nee prothorax,
not sulcate laterally; frons generally wider than dorsal tip of beak. . 73
Elytra reddish bronze, legs in part rufous (Veracruz; Guatemala).
vinosum Sharp (p. 294)
Elytra black, aeneous; legs black. . . ...... : Mer ALi) P70
Beak shorter than prothorax; frons slightly narrower fee ee tip of beak
(Veracruz, México, Morelos, Michoacan, Guerrero).
glyphicum Sharp (p. 292)
Beak slightly longer than prothorax; frons equal to dorsal tip of beak (Baja
California)... .....4.2.+.. =... .. .chuparosae Fall (p. 291)
Prothorax black, elytra blue; prothorax with noticeable prominence on lateral
basal region (Argentina; Brazil) . . .lativentre Béguin-Billecocq (p. 374)
Prothorax and elytra of same color, black; lateral basal region of prothorax
NOL: Prominent +... oF ek see See : aid Yak: 5, Ao et meme
Antennae inserted at distance from eye eerie greater than width of frons;
beak in side view nearly parallel-sided in apical third’ (Washington, Wyo-
ming, Colorado, Utah, California, Durango, México).
proclive LeConte (p. 289)
Antennae inserted at distance from eye more than one-half greater than
width of frons; beak in side view attenuate to apex ........ 75
Antennae inserted in front of basal third of beak; elytral pubescence uniform;
prothorax at middle not narrower than base (New Mexico, Arizona).
dolosum Fall (p. 370)
Antennae inserted behind basal third of beak; pubescence forming a more or
less distinct spot at base of interval 3; prothorax widest at base. . . 76
Size larger than 2.50 mm.; mucrones dentate apically (Puebla, México, Dis-
trito Federal, Guerrero). . . . . . .submetallicum Boheman (p. 330)
Size about 1.75 mm.; mucrones angulate apically (Tabasco).
adaetum, new species (p. 284)
SUBGENUS TRICHAPION—KISSINGER 259
Species of Uncertain Position
Apion (Trichapion) aequabile Fall
FicureE 1,),c,g,7.
Apion aequabile Fall, Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc., vol. 25, p. 148, 1898.
Description: Length, 1.6 to 2.0mm. Moderately robust. Black;
pubescence conspicuous, coarse, white, sparse, coarser and denser
laterally. Male beak one-eighth longer than prothorax; deflexed in
apical third; in lateral view basal one-third parallel, attenuate through
middle third, apical third nearly parallel, five-sixths as thick as basal
region; from dorsal view widest in basal third at antennal insertion
where it is one-fourth wider than base, attenuate to apex, there three-
fourths as wide as base; sparsely pubescent in basal two-thirds,
punctures there coarse, apical one-third with fine punctures, shining.
Female beak as long as head and prothorax combined, one-half
longer than prothorax, slightly curved, apical half nearly cylindrical,
somewhat depressed near tip; strongly punctured laterally in basal
half, fine scales in two short sulci above antennal insertion, shining
and glabrous beyond antennal insertion. Antennae inserted at dis-
tance from eye equal to width of frons, of male in basal fourth of
beak, of female at basal fifth of beak; first segment slightly shorter
than next two, second segment a little longer than third, club 0.18
by 0.06 mm. Eyes moderately prominent; frons wider than dorsal
tip of beak, with a wide, flat median area and one lateral row of punc-
tures. Prothorax at base one-fifth wider than long, middle as wide
as base, apex two-thirds to three-fourths as wide as base; sides with
moderate lateral expansion at base, slightly diverging to middle,
rounding to constricted apex; in profile dorsal surface very slightly
arcuate from base to apex; punctation shallow, sparse, 0.03 mm. in
diameter, interspaces about one-half as great as diameter of punc-
tures; basal fovea nearly obsolete, elongate. Elytra at humeri one-
third wider than prothorax at base, 2.5 times as long as prothorax,
length to width as 10:7.5; intervals twice as wide as striae, moderately
convex, with two rows of fine punctures bearing fine scales; striae
deep. Scutellum narrow, elongate, 0.08 by 0.04 mm. Claws with
strong, acute basal tooth. Front femora 3.3 times as long as wide.
Special male characters: Tibiae 2 and 3 armed with subdentate
mucrones.
Typss: I hereby designate the lectotype of this species as the male
specimen (MCZ 25071) in the Fall Collection labeled La Chuparosa.
Cotypes are in the J. L. LeConte Collection and in the California
Academy of Sciences.
260 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
MATERIAL EXAMINED: Lectotype and 30 specimens.
KNOWN DISTRIBUTION:
Unrrep Strarss: Arizona: Chiricahua Mts., July 4, 1940, D. E. Hardy (UK);
Globe (CU); Huachuca Mts., Ramsay Canyon, Cochise Co., July 16, 1948, C.
and P. Vaurie (AMNH); Santa Rita Mts., Madera Canyon, beating oak (CU);
Santa Rita Mts. (USNM); Whiteriver, July 4, 1950, D. E. Hardy (UK).
Mexico: Baja California: La Chuparosa (MCZ, CAS). Chihuahua: Chihua-
hua, H. F. Wickham (MCZ). Guerrero: Rio Balsas, H. F. Wickham (TLCC).
Apion (Trichapion) aestimabile Waguer
Apion (Trichapion) aestimabile Wagner, Arch. Naturg. Berlin, vol. 78, p. 115,
1912.
Description: This species was described from a single male in the
Wagner Collection which was not seen by the author. The following
notes are taken from the original description.
Length, 1.8 mm.
Very near A. mexicanum Wagner, head much smaller and narrower,
frons flat with two rows of fine, scale-bearing punctures. Male beak
a little longer than head and prothorax (A. mexicanum beak of male
equal to head and prothorax combined), distinctly less curved than
A. mexicanum, stouter, distinctly swollen at antennal insertion, thence
slightly attenuate. Antennae of male inserted somewhat in front of
middle of beak. Prothorax at base one fifth wider than long, sides
nearly parallel to middle, strongly constricted at apex, there one-
fifth narrower than base; punctation sparser and deeper than A.
mexicanum; basal fovea continues on to near apex, but deep only at
base.
Type Locauity: Veracruz, Mexico.
Remarks: The insertion of the antennae somewhat in front of the
middle of the beak will distinguish this species from all known mem-
bers of the subgenus Trichapion.
Apion (Trichapion) albidulum Fall
Fiaure 1,d,f,h.
Apion albidulum Fall, Journ. New York Ent. Soc., vol. 26, p. 219, 1918.
Description: Length, 2.0 to 2.2 mm.; width, 1.00 to 1.12 mm.
Robust. Black; densely clothed with appressed white scales,
scutellum and beak beyond basal one-fifth glabrous. Male beak
slightly longer than prothorax, female beak shorter than head
and prothorax combined, one-fourth longer than prothorax; mod-
erately evenly curved; dilated at antennal insertion, attenuate to
middle, cylindrical beyond middle; coarsely punctured in basal one-
half, sparsely punctured apically. Antennae inserted at basal one-
fourth, male, at basal one-fifth, female, at distance from eye equal
SUBGENUS TRICHAPION—KISSINGER 261
to width of frons; first segment a little shorter than next two, second
equal to next three combined, club 0.18 by 0.09 mm. Eyes prominent;
frons moderately wide, densely clothed with white scales on either
side of bare median sulcus. Prothorax slightly wider at base than
long, middle as wide as base, apex three-fourths as wide as base;
sides with slight basal lateral expansion, slightly sinuate before base,
apex moderately constricted; in profile dorsal surface slightly arcuate;
punctation moderately deep, 0.03 mm. in diameter, interspaces about
one-half as great as diameter of punctures; basal fovea deep, elongate,
a slightly raised longitudinal median carina occurs in apical one-half.
Elytra at humeri two-fifths wider than prothorax at base, about 2.5
times as long as prothorax, length to width as 11:8.5; intervals flat,
more than twice as wide as striae, with three or four rows of punctures
bearing scales; striae moderately deep, with a single row of scales.
Scutellum elongate, twice as long as wide, 0.12 by 0.05 mm., with
deep, median basal foven. Front femora three times as long as wide.
Claws with a large, acute basal tooth.
Special male characters: Tibiae 2 and 3 armed with moderately
long, straight, denticulate mucrones.
MATERIAL EXAMINED: Type, male (MCZ 25073), labeled Coachella,
Calif., in Fall Collection; and 25 specimens.
KNOWN DISTRIBUTION:
UnitEep States: California: Riverside Co., Coachella (MCZ); Palm Springs
(CU, UK, USNM). Arizona: Fort Yuma (USNM).
Apion (Trichapion) alticola Wagner
Apion (Trichapion) alticola Wagner, Arch. Naturg. Berlin, vol. 78, p. 107, 1912
Description: This species was described from a pair of specimens
in the British Museum (Natural History) not seen by the author,
The following notes are taken from the original description.
Length, 2.2 to 2.4 mm.
Very near A. imitator Wagner, with different beak and legs. Male
beak equal to head and prothorax combined, stouter than A. imitator,
more strongly curved, more distinctly widened at antennal insertion,
more distinctly attenuate toward apex; female beak much stouter
than in A. imitator, only a little longer than head and prothorax,
more strongly curved, punctation deeper, denser; at antennal insertion
beak of female of A. imitator more distinctly swollen than A. altzcola.
Frons striate, middle stria deeper. Legs, especially femora, stouter,
tarsus longer as in A. mediocre Sharp. Male mucrones sharper than
those of A. imitator, somewhat shorter than those of A. mediocre.
Scutellum a little larger than that of A. mediocre, but distinctly
smaller than that of A. mitator, deeply grooved, enclosed in a groove.
Prothorax and elytra the same as A. tmitator.
262 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
TYPE LOCALITY: Omilteme, Guerrero, Mexico, 8,000 feet (BMNH).
Remarks: Wagner’s statement that the elytra of A. alticola are
the same as those of A. imitator is accepted literally. The elytral
intervals of A. imitator are biserially pubescent. The apparently
long beak of this species should distinguish it from related forms.
Apion (Trichapion) asellum Wagner
Apion (Trichapion) asellum Wagner, Arch. Naturg. Berlin, vol. 78, p. 102, 1912.
Description: This species was described from three males from
Managua, Nicaragua, one in the Wagner Collection and two in the
Solari Collection; this material was not seen by the author. The
following notes are a translation of the original description.
Length, 1.7 to 1.9 mm.
Near preceding species [godmanz], of same body size and general
habitus, also same color; but has much larger and denser gray-white
pubescence on head, prothorax, and elytra; and denser pubescence on
ventral surface and following characters: eye of male distinctly larger;
frons somewhat smaller, nearly smooth, indistinctly striate; eyes
beneath with snow white cilia. Beak slightly shorter than head and
prothorax combined, hardly curved; from above, base to antennal
insertion with wrinkled sculpture and single punctures, rather dull;
at antennal insertion slightly wider, from there to apex rather strongly
attenuate; with rows of punctures on both sides of smooth middle
line, gradually becoming finer toward apex; more shining and glabrous
toward apex; from side angulately swollen under the antennal
insertion, on dorsal line slightly angulate over antennal insertion.
Antennae inserted at distance equal to long diameter of eye, otherwise
much like godmani. The prothorax is larger in comparison to the
elytra, at the bisinuate base only one-sixth wider than long, in front
with a slightly uniform constriction, the constriction before the hind
angle only a little stronger than that before the anterior margin and
rather less than the same in godmani; the punctation is distinctly
denser but finer and deeper, the interspaces smaller than the punctures;
the basal stria is rather short but deep. The elytra hardly differ,
a little wider and from the apex with less sinuation. The scutellum
somewhat larger, triangular, deeply grooved. The legs—especially
the femur—are similar in length but somewhat stouter; the first
tarsal segment distinctly longer and narrower than the second, which is
as long as broad; the claws are longer, widely spread, strongly toothed.
The male with the second and third pair of tibiae mucronate.
SUBGENUS TRICHAPION—KISSINGER 263
Apion (Trichapion) auronitidum Wagner
Apion (Trichapion) auronitidum Wagner, Arch. Naturg. Berlin, vol. 78, p. 113,
1912.
Description: This species was described from a single female
from Capetillo, Guatemala, in the British Museum (Natural History)
that was not seen by the author. The following notes are a transla-
tion of the original description.
Length, 1.8 mm.
Closely related to A. subrufum Sharp, somewhat smaller and more
compact in form, can be recognized by the following characters:
beak of female somewhat shorter, at antennal insertion somewhat
more widened and a little more strongly curved. The head is a
little wider, the frons with a wide, shallow middle striae and finely,
sparsely punctured; the prothorax is of the same general form, but
the disc is nearly impunctate, the sides with large, shallow, distant
punctures; in front of the scutellum is an indistinct, shallow impres-
sion. The elytra in comparison with the prothorax is distinctly shorter
than in subrufum, widest point nearly at middle, with strong humeri;
striae with finer, shallower punctures, intervals slightly convex, with
fine hair-bearing punctures. Legs same as subrufum, only the
tibia blackish, while in subrufum the tibia are rusty red. With
yellowish pubescence especially on head and prothorax, where it is
distinctly longer and somewhat denser than subrufum. Head,
prothorax, and elytra with a bright metallic gold luster. De-
scribed from a specimen in Sharp’s type series of subrufum, from
which it differed by the rust red color of the elytra and prothorax with
its slight metallic luster.
Apion (Trichapion) bettyae, new species
Fiaure 1,¢,7,k
Duscrietion: Length, 3.90 mm.; width, 1.75 mm.
Moderately robust, depressed. Black; pubescence conspicuous,
white, long, fine, somewhat coarser and denser on sides of mesothorax
and metathorax. Male beak stout, shorter than prothorax, nearly
straight; in lateral view nearly parallel-sided, upper surface abruptly
deflexed downward toward tip; in dorsal view tapering from antennal
insertion to apex, not expanded laterally at antennal insertion;
coarsely, deeply, rather densely punctured, pubescence conspicuous
to near tip, tip smoother; dorsal margin of antennal scrobe continues
to apical third as a carina overhanging a series of deep punctures
which appear to form a sulcus. Female beak equal in length to
483661—59—_2
VOL. 110
ve
k
Figure 1.—a, Apion laminatum Sharp, lateral view of head (after Sharp, 1890). , c, g, 1,
A. aequabile Fall: b, lateral view of head and prothorax of male; c, mucro of tibia 3 of
male; g, lateral view of head and prothorax of female; i, entire dorsal view of male. d,f, h,
A. albidulum Fall: d, mucro of tibia 3 of male; f, lateral view of head and prothorax of
male; h, entire dorsal view of male. ¢, 7, k, A. bettyae, new species: ¢, mucro of tibia 2
of male; 7, lateral view of head and prothorax of male; k, entire dorsal view of male.
Line equals 0.50 mm.
SUBGENUS TRICHAPION—KISSINGER 265
prothorax, stout, nearly straight; in lateral view ventral surface
slopes upward slightly from antennal insertion to apical third, dorsal
surface slopes strongly to apex; in dorsal view attenuate strongly from
antennal insertion to middle, apical half nearly parallel; sculpture
similar to male. Antennae inserted near basal third of beak, male,
at basal fourth of beak, female, at distance from eye one-third greater
than width of frons; first segment slightly shorter than next four,
second equal to next two, club 0.24 by 0.12 mm. Eyes moderately
prominent; frons narrower than dorsal tip of beak, with a fine, very
deep median sulcus and one lateral row of coarser, more or less sepa-
rated punctures. Prothorax at base slightly wider than long, middle
narrower than base, apex two-thirds as wide as base; sides beyond
basal lateral expansion moderately converging to distad of middle,
rounded in apical third to constricted apex; in profile dorsal surface
slightly arcuate toward base, strongly arcuate in apical third; puncta-
tion deep, 0.06 to 0.08 mm. in diameter, interspaces narrow, sub-
cariniform, dull, strongly alutaceous; basal fovae linear, deep, ex-
tending one-third length of prothorax. Elytra at humeri one-third
wider than prothorax at base, about 2.25 times as long as prothorax,
length to width as 10:7; intervals about one-half wider than striae,
concave, with one row of rather large, shallow punctures. Front
femora 3.7 times as long as wide. Claws with acute basal tooth.
Special male characters: Tibia 2 with a short, nearly simple mucro
projecting in line with long axis of tibia.
Typns: Holotype male (CAS), Atlixco, Puebla, Mexico, May, A.
Fenyes Collection. Allotype female, same data as holotype; both
mounted on same pin. One paratype, same data as holotype.
Remarks: The large size; short, stout beak; and male secondary
sexual characters will distinguish this species.
I am pleased to name this outstanding species in honor of my wife,
Betty, in acknowledgment of her understanding interest during the
course of this research.
Apion (Trichapion) chalybaeum Wagner
Apion (Trichapion) chalybaewm Wagner, Arch. Naturg. Berlin, vol. 78, p. 111,
1912.
Description: This species was described from a few specimens in
the Solari Collection that were not seen by the author. The following
notes are taken from the original description.
Length, 1.8 to 1.9 mm.
Closely related to A. oscillator Sharp, of same size, shape of pro-
thorax and elytra, and color; differs markedly in form of rostrum,
which in both sexes is nearly cylindrical, only at the antennal insertion
slightly angulate, somewhat stouter especially in female, less strongly
VOL. 110
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM
266
‘safe oAo0ge
poqorsysuoo AT} Y BIS
‘saa 0} O80]
pojiosur ovuuojue fyBoq
jo di} [esiop uvy} JOP
“Aypeorde
you Jo pepuvdxe ‘paAino
‘Zuo, AlfeyVitspoy_, :ol[Bwogq
*xBloyjoid uvy} Josuoy] yonuw
you ‘Iopuas AjoyeIopopy :o[Vyy
“A[SNOLIVA
poeygipou | so ‘(ajeua
-o1ontr ¢€ ‘Z% YJIA sun}
-1uids ‘snjdoua ‘sadip.sve
-]09) oyeuolonu Z BIqly,
asanzuids
‘safa dA0gB
pezorsysuoo ATTqSIIg
“ywoq jo dy
[esiop uBy} JepIm yonyy
‘ATTBISIp jou
Io popuedxs ‘pacing ‘eeu
*xB10y}
-o1d uvy} Josu0] ‘Iapue[g ole
“BOIB 9YBIIS
poysyod yy J] ovrqr
‘aywuoionmr ¢ ‘% ovIqly,
‘sofa aAo0qe
poeqotmysuo0d ATSuo01g
“yBoq jo
diy [esiop usy} JopIm JoN
‘ATTeISIP popued
-xo9 Ajsuo0is ‘poaAmo ‘oeuioy
*xBioyjoid ueyy
JosuoT you “ynojys AJaA :o[B]
‘sofa 2A0q®B pa
-yolrjsuoo Ajo7yeV1opoyy
"xB0q JO
dij [vsiop sv opm sB ynoqy
‘AyTeorde popuvd
-xo Aj[su01s ‘poaaing ‘orewoy
*xeioyjoid uvyy
IaBuo] ‘ynojs ATaYBIBpOTT ‘9B
*(oVeUOIONU [[B WIM
2f109) ayeuorion ug ‘Z OBIQIT,
| | | ee |
‘sofa oAO0q®B
peyorsysuoo AT} YSIS
“BOQ
‘AT[VIsSIp popuvdxa
eee ee | Nee
u0oVeVWKe—ewoosSS | ae=_nw*“?»zaoaeoawooaOo o<“s“ee——————SsS asso esDD aes=$_—000SSawuwaa=onm]
poay fo wns.og
you ‘peaino ATpVYSIQ :ofewmagq
*xeloyyoid
uvy} dJesu0o, ‘1apusl[g :o[Byy
UNLSOY
ayou fo shay
Agsty o[twuts uoldy 07 paznjas sdnoi6 saraads fo ssajovunpy)—'% ATAVY,
267
SUBGENUS TRICHAPION—KISSINGER
*poyorsysuoo ATPYSIIG
"payolsysuod ATPYSTIG
ET
*Ayyeorde
07BNU9}}B PUB d}VSUOTY :o[BUlA,T
"yBoq *xodv ivou 04
jo diy yesiop uvy} septa | Juooseqnd puv ozenusz}yV sole] ‘ayeuoionul & ‘Z% OBIqT, UWNIUIDJAUGNS
“AT[VISIP popuvdxe soul}
"SUOIJ JO YJPIM OOIM} 4B -oul0s ‘oyesuole A[{BVeIyD 2 [BUI T
pejiosul ovuuoqjue ‘yvoq *xeioyjoid uvyy
jo diy [esiop uvy} Jopiyy | Josuoy ‘yno4ys ATa}BIepoyy :o[ef ‘opyeuoronu Z BIQL, aujsourjnjound
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 116
268
*popunol
A[su0148 Jou sopris ‘tenba ‘diy vou 0} oyendeyye ‘u0y
"gn04s Ajayw1opoyy | Jnoqe epplur pus asvg | -iosur [euUueJUR IOAO pepusdxg
‘(eyBuO1ONM [fe wnary
-inf ‘wnjsafuor “unpow
-uL09) o}BuoIONU & ‘Z OBIQLT,
WRAPSOL
‘peylpou
A[SNONVA |f Bo] ‘(94BuU
-O1OOL [[B YIM wnwop
-409) oyeuoIONu g ‘Z VBICLT,
‘pepunod A[su0148 septs ‘UOT}IOSUI
‘yno4s Ajayerepoy] | ‘o[pplu uvy} JoMOIIeU osvg | [vuUEqUe 48 pepuBdxe A[Su0.Ng
‘diy 0} [eormpuly
-Ao0 A[rvou ‘uory1sul [euUszUE
‘qnoyg ‘o[pplul Se opiM su oseg | puofkaq payorjsuoa s]ydnuqy ‘OPBUOION UL VBI) [TV u4ngr}qQo
BOAO}
Teseq qioys YIM ‘ofppru “UOryasut
‘Jopusys ATa}wIepoW | uvy} Jeprm yYyonw aseg | [wUUeJUB J0AO popuRdxe :
;
C
Pld toe st L rece seen aie mya? ? eke wil HED art Lory ih A Lea
BS cai Meee abr Pa Ce, baa bhi Pays), eae ae
. ‘oo _ a ee ae
: ' : 7 : a Par, uy Ee P ~ 7
urate lesiee| i) bb preteen ey th CO Li toh te oit]f iff Bah
| | HE iA pM bal
as ; P04 ee ~!
a | ; alibi
i Pr fi Lor | ler citalt ia y Pat | a = " u My a hats ~
7 oi int
| | \ Sab baker
| es arpa
Ny’). Teel th! rea cit rete) “Wiest! Se 19 RE
- y hg
7 Ai palh iY Pen lay vie
fhey il. tal fas, oils, Ae eo ee Soler nalee ia ns ay mnovd
Sind SiGient wot sneaks
i : bees A
Cteahe | : (ecm baal) a ae iGO
; tirsts! wl on nS 1) iva 4 bre lipra aon mil =
(yt Pe, thawed nas wa E letehaee 0 y prs altyt! om
POU am th feet ghar Te a ee Uae, et iil |
sf . u st
dios Abt tt abel > dea UP Ty uaa achat tactic Seti saat
Gia ati tiie es Se pare ry 9) VET Ete
Or eileen gee
Ggnideaue sae wos ued a Lapeer ie Apes) TAPER COGS
i eel Rioth: Med
we ay, wr bn fa (eat? j inn Ty ee ret i) oa thy yertiott ;
Fy aeRO) PST SERT Ea at Agi ja se ORT aN Spy isn VEC A aaa
rik DL ek natant Me TAL, ib Stine dA iron SOIR
y Riot G (i ti - tata af ‘
ie 20 ia ay jane ei ASO Fah PN RHETY ty “iby
A ity : A! i \; wi | Be a 5: ri
gisfhay nee EDAD pre tc & Uiey ie mI atin gly) paves grin aii! 7
' - sine ime die othe to)
Op ee ee Coan fers
ue elias yw i = on ng hens on 4 ; Mins 40 i DHA govubwe att
» O8 Garee ceret Rabat Bene nb! z Ber Bar AE Shot
Vbiysey a REA Hye DERN EE, zal welt ec.
AT ANIE, cepa
a (oo aliAl i :
PROCEEDINGS OF THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
U.S. NATIONAL MUSEUM
Vol. 110 Washington : 1959 No. 3419
A DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FINAL
INSTAR LARVAE OF THE ICHNEUMONIDAE (INSECTA,
HYMENOPTERA)
By J. R. T. SHort!
Introduction
In this paper are given a description and classification of the final
instar larvae of the Ichneumonidae based on a study of species repre-
senting 151 genera. Keys are given to the subfamilies, tribes, and
genera. Characters of the subfamilies and tribes are described verbally,
but the description of each genus usually takes the form of a diagram.
Any special features are noted in the text, and when a species differs
from that figured for a genus the difference is noted. Diagrams were
selected as the most concise and accurate method for recording
larval characters.
MatTERIAL AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
In work of this nature great care must be taken to insure that only
reliably identified material is used. Most of the material on which
this study is based comes from the U.S. National Museum, Wash-
ington, D.C. I wish to thank the Museum for permission to borrow
material and I am most grateful to Miss Luella M. Walkley for her
help and advice concerning this work. I am also grateful to Mr. G.
1 Natural History Department, Marischal College, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland.
391
392 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Stuart Walley of the Canadian Department of Agriculture, Ottawa,
for supplying material and to Mr. J. F. Perkins of the British Museum
(Natural History) for permission to study material and for his advice
on the classification of the Ichneumonidae. I also wish to thank
Prof. G. C. Varley of the Hope Department of Entomology, Oxford,
for his many helpful suggestions and for lending me a number of slides
from his collection; Mr. E. R. Skinner of the Imperial Forestry Insti-
tute, Oxford, who supplied me with larvae of Rhyssa; and Dr. G. Salt,
F.R.S., of the Zoological Department, Cambridge University, who
supplied me with larvae of Collyria and Idechthis.
Since living larvae often give valuable information, I have collected
as widely as possible for this study. Most of the slide preparations
have been deposited at the U.S. National Museum. Material borrowed
from the Canadian Department of Agriculture and the British Museum
has been returned. Most of the material sent by Professor Varley
has been returned, but material of Orthopelma and Hemiteles that he
did not wish returned has been deposited at the U.S. National Mu-
seum. Material of Collyria and Idechthis sent by Dr. Salt and material
of Rhyssa sent by Mr. Skinner have also been deposited at the U.S.
National Museum. Material returned to the Canadian Department
of Agriculture (CDA), to the British Museum (BM), and to Professor
Varley (GCV) is indicated by initials. Material not so indicated has
been deposited in the U.S. National Museum.
Detailed records (by whom determined, locality, etc.) have not
been recorded for any specimens since this information can be ob-
tained from the data labels of the collections of bred material (now
returned to the U.S. National Museum and the Canadian Depart-
ment of Agriculture) from which larval skins were obtained. The
procedure adopted in using this bred material was as follows: The
collection of preparations of larval skins was numbered and fully
labeled; when a larval skin was extracted from the cocoon of a bred
specimen a label was added to the pin of the specimen reading “Larval
skin removed; slide No. X; J.R.T.S.; 195X.’’ Thus, it is possible to
refer from the preparation of a larval skin to the adult and its de-
termination.
Meruops
Much of the material used was available as cast skins in the cocoons
of bred ichneumonids. The contents of the cocoon, the final instar
larval skin and the meconium, were removed by making a longitudinal
cut in the cocoon and then boiled in a 5 percent solution of caustic
potash. Sometimes larval skins of instars previous to the final were
found in the cocoons. After boiling, the cleaned and softened larval
skins were washed in distilled water, stretched, dehydrated, and
ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 393
mounted in Canada balsam. Balsam was used to ensure a satis-
factory permanent mount, but for more rapid work larvae may be
transferred from distilled water to Faure’s fluid. Where larval mate-
rial was available in the host pupa, as in the Ichneumoninae and
Pimplini, the entire pupa was softened by boiling in caustic potash
and the pupa was cut open when soft to extract the ichneumonid
larval skin. This method ensured that the brittle pupa was not
not damaged. Fresh larvae were opened by a midventral cut and
then boiled in a 5 percent solution of caustic potash. They were
then washed, dehydrated, and mounted.
NOMENCLATURE
The taxonomy of the Ichneumonidae is in a confused state, and the
nomenclature of European and American authors differs to some
extent. Since much of the material used in this study is North
American in origin, the nomenclature of Walkley (1958) is used. The
names of larvae described in the literature have been altered, when
necessary, to conform with this nomenclature. When genera were
not listed by Miss Walkley, her advice was sought on nomenclature,
or, if the genera were listed in Kloet and Hincks (1945), the nomen-
clature of these authors was followed.
Description and Classification
Since the relationships indicated by the larval characters support
a classification similar to that given by Townes and Townes (1951)
in the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s synoptic catalog and by
Walkley (1958) in the supplement to that catalog, the classification
of these: authors has been followed. Although a somewhat different
classification could have been constructed on the basis of larval
structure alone, every effort was made to avoid this because informa-
tion on both larvae and adults is essential for an understanding of
the taxonomy of the group. A classification based solely on the
characters of the larvae would be as unsatisfactory as a classification
based solely on the characters of the adults.
It was necessary to depart from the classification in the above-
mentioned synoptic catalog in one case: The Anomalinae are here
considered as a separate subfamily rather than as a tribe of the
Ophioninae. Such differences are to be expected since the inde-
pendence of larval and adult forms makes a separate evolution possible
(Wigglesworth, 1954). Selective factors acting on the legless larvae
are different from those acting on the mobile adults.
Studies on larval systematics are of interest from two standpoints;
they enable workers to identify larvae and they help in understanding
the classification of the adults (see van Emden, 1957). It is hoped
394 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL, 110
that the keys to subfamilies and tribes will require no great modifi-
cation as a result of future work, which is expected to take the form
of detailed studies within tribes and genera. As a result of such work
the keys to genera given here will be greatly modified, for the genera
studied were usually represented by but two or three species. This
number of species might be satisfactory if one could assume that the
larval characters of all the species of a genus would indicate a close
relationship. This is very far from being the case. In some genera
this may be due to species differing more as larvae than as adults. In
others, as in the genus Scambus, it appears to be due to the confused
state of the taxonomy of the adults. However, it is hoped that the
present keys to genera will serve as a basis for future studies.
It is generally believed that, since adult insects show a greater
degree of differentiation than larvae, their characters are likely to
remain more important for species identification (van Emden, 1955).
No attempt has been made in the present study to give a key to
species. A vast amount of material would be required for such
work. But itis significant that species of the braconid genus Apanteles
can be arranged into groups corresponding with the groups into
which the adults are divided (Short, 1953).
EXTERNAL STRUCTURE OF FINAL INSTAR LARVA
The final instar ichneumonid larva consists of a hemispherical
head, three thoracic segments, and ten abdominal segments. The
cranium is lightly sclerotized, with the mandibles and certain bands
associated with the mouthparts more heavily sclerotized. The body
wall of the thorax and abdomen is very lightly sclerotized or un-
sclerotized, with the exception of the spiracles and setae. The spi-
racles are situated in most species on the prothoracic and first eight
abdominal segments. A line of setae is present in most species encir-
cling each thoracic and abdominaJ segment. Small projections are
present on the skin and these may be lightly sclerotized.
The structures used in¥this classification are the form of the
mandibles and head sclerites, and of the antennae, spiracles, and
skin. For the basis of the terminology of the head parts, which is
outlined below, reference should be made to Short (1952). The
head of ichneumonids (fig. 1) is lightly sclerotized except for certain
more heavily sclerotized bands strengthening the cranium in the
region of the mandibles, maxillae, and labium. The sclerotic arch,
which is sometimes present dorsal to the mandibles (md), is called
the epistoma (epst). The anterior tentorial pits (at) are situated in
the epistoma. Lateral to each mandible is a pleurostoma (plst).
The mandible articulates with two processes of the pleurostoma (fig.
1c). The anterior pleurostomal process (app) fits into a cavity of
ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 395
the mandible and the posterior pleurostomal process (ppp) ends in a
socket which receives the mandibular condyle. The hypostoma (fig.
1B, hst) is a sclerotic band running posteriorly along the subgenal
margin of the cranium. Each maxilla (mx) consists of a lightly
sclerotized cardo (cd) and a membranous stipes (st) supported
ventrally by a sclerotic band called the stipital sclerite (ss(q)). The
medial lobe of the maxilla represents the lacinia (lc). The galea is
absent. The maxillary palp (mplp) is reduced to a flattened disc.
A sclerotic band called the hypostomal spur (hsp) projects ventrally
from the hypostoma across the stipes. In many species it fits into
a depression in the stipital scierite. Surrounding the posterior
margin of the prelabium (plb) is a labial sclerite (Ibs). The labial
palps (Iplp) are reduced to flattened discs. The silk press (sp) at
the orifice (slo) of the silk glands is usually well sclerotized. Some
ichneumonid larvae, such as the Campoplegini, have a Y-shaped
sclerite, called the prelabial sclerite, on the prelabium. A sclerotic
band, the labral sclerite (Ims), is often present marking the dorsal
limits of the labrum (lm).
The mandible (fig. 1c) consists fundamentally of a broad base (ba)
articulating with the pleurostomal processes, and a more slender
blade (bl). The base and blade of the mandible of Xorides are not
differentiated, but usually, as for example in the Ephialtini, the
blade is slender. The blade of the mandible may bear teeth (t) on
its dorsal and ventral surfaces.
The antennae (ant) may be papilliform or disc-shaped. The
ocular lines (ol), which mark the place of the developing imaginal
compound eyes, are often sclerotized.
Each spiracle (fig. 1p) consists of a rounded atrium (atr) connected
with the closing apparatus (ca) by a length of trachea which is often
characteristic of the group to which the larva belongs. Finer details
of spiracular structure have not been used in this classification. The
prothoracic spiracle is usually figured but, where the preparation did
not show the structure of this clearly, another spiracle was selected
for illustration. The proportions of the structure of the spiracles are
relatively constant.
The length of the setae of the skin and the presence or absence of
spines have been found useful taxonomic features. Spines serving as
holdfast organs are present on the skin of the Polysphinctini and some
Ephialtini.
The drawings of heads which illustrate this paper are morphologi-
cally inaccurate since they show it as a flattened object, whereas it is,
in reality, a hemisphere. This point is important since Beirne (1941,
pp. 149, 167), for example, has attempted to use the position and
degree of curving of the hypostomal sclerite as a taxonomic character.
396 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL, 110
This is unwise since the position and degree of curving of the head
sclerites depends to some extent on the position assumed during
mounting. However, it has been found a satisfactory method for
taxonomic purposes to record the heads from preparations of cast
skins and fresh larvae flattened in a standard way. By this method
all the head parts can be shown in the one diagram.
The size and appearance of the cocoons have not been used in this
classification since precise descriptions, either verbally or by drawings,
were found very difficult. The color patterns of cocoons should be
useful in future taxonomic work within some genera.
poc pos
cS léec]
Figure 1.—Xorides sp.: a, anterior view of head; B, lateral view of head; c, lateral view of
mandible; p, spiracle. Explanation of symbols on facing page. Detailed explanation
on pages 394, 395.
397
ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT
Larval Key to Subfamilies of Ichneumonidae (except Orthocentrinae)
i
Mandibles unsclerotized and, of the head sclerites, only the pleurostoma and
each lateral part of the epistoma are sclerotized; accessory longitudinal
tracheal commissure not present fee Se Coliyriinae
Mandibles well sclerotized, or, if not, then labial ecleane present; accessory
longitudinal tracheal commissure present in thorax ...... . 2
isualral sclerite presentrc(s to3; was y ative tastings) & Ragrotioden an sice 3
Labral sclerite absent?. . . . Agha 5
. Spur of hypostoma meeting stipital eclenes on or near fy 2g eit end or,
if not, then with each lateral part of labral sclerite broadened into roughly
quadrate area, or with mandible roughly triangular in shape with no clear
differentiation between base and blade and with two dorsal rows of large
teeth Pimplinae other than Pimplini and Acaenitini
Spur of hypostoma not meeting stipital sclerite close to its median end; each
lateral part of labral sclerite not broadened into quadrate area; mandible
with blade clearly differentiated from base ........... +
Epistomal arch lightly sclerotized * Tryphoninae
Epistomal arch not sclerotized‘. . Cryptinae
2 Except Opheltes, Protarchus (Mesoleiinae, Mesoleiini).
3 Except Idiogramma (Tryphoninae, Idiogrammatini).
4 Except Gambrus (Cryptinae, Cryptini).
ExpLANATION oF SYMBOLS ON Ficure 1
ama: Anterior mandibular articulation
ant: Antenna
ant sk: Antennal socket
app: Anterior pleurostomal process
at: Anterior tentorial pit
atr: Atrium of spiracle
ba: Base of mandible
bl: Blade of mandible
ca: Closing apparatus of spiracle
cd: Cardo
clp: Clypeus
cs(decl): Coronal stem of dorsal
ecdysial cleavage line
dfm: Cranial depression associated with
origin of frontal muscles
epst: Epistoma
fm: Food meatus
fr: Frons
ge: Gena
hyph: Hypopharynx
hsp: Sclerotic spur of hypostoma
hst: Hypostoma
Ib: Labium
lbs: Labial sclerite
Ic: Lacinia
Im: Labrum
Ims: Labral sclerite
Iplp: Labial palp
md: Mandible
mplp: Maxillary palp
mx: Maxilla
oc: Occiput
ol: Ocular line
pa: Parietal region of cranium
plb: Postlabium
plst: Pleurostoma
pma: Posterior mandibular articulation
poc: Postocciupt
pos: Postoccipital sulcus
ppp: Posterior pleurostomal process
prib: Prelabium
pt: Posterior tentorial pit
slo: Salivary orifice
sp: Silk press
ss(q): Stipital sclerite
st: Stipes
t: Teeth of mandible
vx: Vertex
398 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
10.
Las
12.
138.
14.
15.
16.
ke
18.
9s
Epistomal arch well sclerotized® .... isi At Bae Ae 6
Epistomal arch very lightly sclerotized or Abeent CPt Sed Lee ae ial
. Labial sclerite at least moderately sclerotized. . ......... a
Labial sclerite never more than very faintly sclerotized. ...... 10
‘ibabialsclerite complete ventrally = 4 92% 2's eo ene 8
Labial sclerite incomplete ventrally’. . . . 208 9
. Stipital sclerite and hypostomal spur ell sulévotiedl’ Pirnplinae, Pimplini
Stipital sclerite and hypostomal spur very lightly sclerotized.
Pimplinze, Acaenitini
Setae present on prelabium ............... .. Metopiinae
Setae absent from prelabium?7 . . f ... . . Anomalinae
Mandible with grooved blade bosreainine prominent tooth: hypostoma verv
lightly sclerotized; labial palps not disc-shaped . . . . Orthopelmatinaze
Mandible without grooved blade containing prominent tooth; hypostoma
well sclerotized; labial palps dise-shaped . . . . . . . Ichneumoninae
Labial sclerite sharply pcinted ventrally ..... . . . .. Diplazoninae
Labial sclerite not sharply pointed ventrally ...... , Ee 12
Mandible with base sclerotized only at periphery .... . Mesuélicbinine
Mandible with base evenly sclerotized .. . . . . Slee 13
Stipital sclerite not extending laterally beyond noi of ene with spur of
hypostoma. . . . . . . . Plectiscinae
Stipital sclerite ex ienhine iebeeale Heed ae of meeting with spur of
hypostoma... . gt 14
Mandible with numerous fine ee on odor side i Binder : ‘Adelognassinae
Mandible not toothed or with short blunt teeth on dorsal and ventral sides
of blades 405 fa: oe 15
Hypostoma not Seats hevand lateral end ot slipitall Heese, or with
sclerotic band connecting posterior pleurostomal processes across dorsal
surface of food meatus, or with twelve or more setae situated largely within
the membrane of the prelabium. .. . . . . . Lissonotinae
Hypostoma extending beyond lateral end of epiptieal selerite; sclerotic band
not present connecting posterior pleurostomal processes; if numerous
setae present on prelabium, they are scattered over a very broad labial
sclerite as well as over the prelabial membrane . . . 3 lee 16
Many (more than four) setae scattered over broad jabiall aclefite and on
membrane of prelabium .. . . . . . . Ophioninae, Ophionini
Not more than four setae on Siento ee . wake A
Labial sclerite as wide or wider than long (in RAterOnOcrenion directa) and
hypostoma! spur longer than blade of mandible. . . . . Ave 18
Labial sclerite longer than wide or, if not, then length of ispostcnnel spur
is equal to or less than length of blade of mandible.
Ophicninze, Campoplegini
Mandible conical in shape with small tooth at apex.
QOphicninae, Tersilochini
Mandible not of thisshape. ... . in nee 19
Closing apparatus of spiracle not well Beierotived ana broader than spiracle.
Ophioninze, Cremastini
Closing apparatus of spiracle moderately sclerotized and as wide as or more
narrow than spiracle. .............. . .. Mesoleiinae
5 Except Listrodromus (Ichneumoninae, Listrodromini), Triclistus (Metopiinae), Xanthopimpla (Pim-
plinae, Pimplini).
6 Except Evxetastes (Lissonotinae). 7 Except Anomalon (Anomalinae.
ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 399
In the following descriptions of larval structure in the various
subfamilies, a list of species studied is given. A list is also given of
those descriptions in the literature which were thought sufficiently
accurate and detailed to help workers in identifying material. The
standard of published descriptions of ichneumonid larvae is still poor
despite Beirne’s (1941) paper, and many references to descriptions
have been omitted since the figures given are too small and vague.
The biological notes given for the various subfamilies and tribes
are based on those of ‘Townes and Townes (1951) and Walkley (1958).
The subfamilies, tribes and genera are considered in the order given
by Townes and Townes (1951), or Walkley (1958), except in the case
of the Mesochorinae, which are moved from a position following the
Anomalinae and placed near the Lissonotinae for reasons stated in
the section dealing with the Mesochorinae. The species are considered
in alphabetical order. When genera are added to the list of Walkley
they are placed near what were thought, on larval characters, to be
closely related genera.
Subfamily Pimplinae
Figures 2-10
On larval characters the Pimplinae fall into two groups; in one are
the Pimplini and in the other are the Ephialtini, Polysphinctini,
Neoxoridini, Rhyssini, Theroniini, Labenini, and Xoridini. The
Acaenitini have a special position. The Pimplini usually have the
epistoma well sclerotized, the hypostoma short, and the mandible
large and without teeth. The labial sclerite is longer than wide and
its ventral side is broad. The labral sclerite is absent. The setae on
the skin are small. In the second group the epistoma is, at most,
lightly sclerotized, and the hypostoma is long. The mandibles are
relatively smaller than in the Pimplini and they usually bear teeth.
The form of the mandible is similar in the Ephialtini, Neoxoridini,
Rhyssini, and Labenini in having a slender blade and a dorsal and
ventral row of small teeth. In the Theroniini and in Delomerista
(Ephialtini) the blade of the mandible is bifurcated, one part having
dorsal and ventral teeth and the other being toothless. The labial
sclerite is basically triangular in shape, although in the Rhyssini and
Neoxoridini the labial sclerite is pointed ventrally, and in the Theroni-
ini the ventral part of the labial sclerite is broad so that the sclerite
resembles that of the Pimplini and Acaenitini. The labral sclerite is
present. The setae on the skin are relatively longer than in the first
group. The Acaenitini show characters of both groups. The man-
dible is similar to that of the Pimplini, and the absence of the labral
sclerite and the presence of a sclerotized epistoma also suggest this
400 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
tribe. But the hypostoma is long and the labial sclerite is roughly
triangular in shape, although the ventral part of the sclerite is broad
as in the Pimplini. In all tribes of the Pimplinae, with the exception
of the Labenini and Xoridini, the hypostomal spur meets the stipital
sclerite on or near the point of meeting of this and the labial sclerite.
In the Pimplini this results in the sclerites around the mandibles
having a ringlike appearance. Apart from this one character the
groups in the Pimplinae are distinct.
Since the Pimplini (with the possible exception of Jtoplectis) are
endoparasites which emerge from the pupa of the Lepidopterous host,
and the remaining tribes of the Pimplinae (with the possible exception
of some Acaenitini) are ectoparasites, differences in larval structure
might be expected. The Pimplini, with their large, toothless man-
dibles and well-developed epistomal and pleurostomal sclerites resemble
to some degree other ichneumonid larvae with similar habits (see
pp. 502, 505, 506).
Beirne (1941) in his classification of larval Ichneumonidae has
placed the Polysphinctini, Rhyssini, Ephialtini, and Xoridini with the
Cryptinae. This has not been followed in the present study for,
although the Pimplini differ in many aspects from the Ephialtini and
similar tribes, the position of the hypostomal spur gives a common
character for the subfamily. Where this character is not shown
clearly, as in the Labenini and Xoridini, the remaining characters
indicate the relationships of the tribe. In the Labenini the form of
the mandible closely resembles that of the Ephialtini. In the Xoridini
the general form of the head sclerites, particularly the labial sclerite,
resembles that of most Pimplinae, rather than any other Ichneumonid
group. The form of the mandible of the Xoridini differs from that of
all other ichneumonids.
It is significant that the Acaenitini and Theroniini show characters
resembling those of both the Pimplini and the Ephialtini and similar
tribes.
LarvaL Kry
1. Setae on body longer than blade of mandible . . . . . . . Polysphinctini
Setae on body not longer than blade of mandible. ........... 2
2,. Labial sclerite sharply pointed; ventrally = . <:.. . +.-..17.. 4 fase) eee
Labial sclerite not sharply pointed ventrally. .......2..2....4
3. Ventral point of labial sclerite continuous with sclerite. . . . . . Rhyssini
Ventral point of labial sclerite appearing as distinct plate at end of sclerite.
Neoxoridini
4, Each lateral part of labral sclerite expanded into quadrate-shaped area.
Labenini
Each lateral part of labral sclerite not expanded into quadrate-shaped area . 5
ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT AQ]
5. Ventral part of labial sclerite broad and without lobes on ventral surface.
Theroniini
Ventral part of labial sclerite, if broad, has lobes on ventral surface . .. 6
6. Mandible triangular with no sharp differentiation between base and blade.
XMoridini
Mandible with sharp differentiation between base and blade . . Ephialtini
Tribe Ephialtini
Figures 2-4
The epistoma is absent except in Tromatobia where it is present as
a thin, lightly sclerotized arch; the pleurostoma is lightly sclerotized;
the hypostoma is well sclerotized and may be enlarged posterior to
the hypostomal spur; the spur of the hypostoma meets the stipital
sclerite at its point of meeting the labial sclerite; the stipital sclerite
is always present but it may be short; the cardo is visible in some
genera as a lightly sclerotized plate; the labial sclerite is roughly
triangular in shape; the labral sclerite is present and its median part
is lightly sclerotized and often bilobed; the mandible in most genera
has a slender blade with a row of fine teeth on the dorsal and on the
ventral surfaces (but Tromatobia appears to have only a dorsal row
of teeth, and in Delomerista diprionis Cushman the blade is bifurcated) ;
the antenna is papilliform; the closing apparatus of the spiracle is
narrower than the atrium and is usually separated from the atrium
by a length of trachea equal in length to that of the closing appa-
ratus, although in Alophosternum the closing apparatus is long and
slender; the skin has well developed setae which are usually equal
in length to the blade of the mandible; in Tromatobia the setae are
very small and groups of spines are present; spines are absent from
other genera of the tribe.
LaRvAL Kry
ho
1. Small lobes present on ventral edge of labial sclerite® .
Small lobes not present on ventral edge of labial sclerite :
2. Hypostomal spur as broad as or broader than posterior part of upestania
Calliephialtes, Ephialtes
co
Hypostomal spur more narrow than posterior part of hypostoma . . Seambus
3. Mandible with blade bifureated®. .......... . .. . Delomerista
Mandible with blade not bifureated . ... . LN xipit AMS ata atatet Ze 4
4. Enlargement present on posterior part of hy eae renin .... . . Iseropus
Enlargement not present on posterior part of hypostoma ....... 5
5. Slender epistomal arch present. . ............. . Trematobia
Epistomal arch absent ............. ~~... Alophosternum
8 Except Scambus pomorum (Ratzeburg) (Imms, 1918; Speyer, 1926) and Calliephialtes dimorphus Cush-
man (Sauer, 1939).
* Except Delomerista sp. (Morris, Cameron and Jepson, 1937).
402 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
a)
| WR 3 ate
i | Ss.) \
Figure 2.—Pimplinae:Ephialtini, head sclerites: a, Scambus hispae (Harris); 8, Alophos-
ternum folticola Cushman; c, Calliephialtes variatipes (Provancher). (1, antenna; 2,
spiracle} 3, skin.)
ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 403
; uv
Ss
O-imm Na
2 3
Ficure 3.—Pimplinae:Ephialtini, head sclerites: a, Ephialtes irritator (Fabricius); 8,
Iseropus stercorator brunneifrons (Viereck); c, Tromatobia rufopectus (Cresson). (1,
antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.)
A404 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
(pon
= le
O:i mm oon Oa Sa yo
2 3
Figure 4.—Pimplinae:Ephialtini, head sclerites: Delomerista diprionis Cushman. (1,
antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.)
The above key must be regarded as provisional, for, on the present
material, it is very difficult to decide on any one characteristic of a
genus. This may be due to the fact that Scambus, to take one exam-
ple, is a composite genus. Dr. G.S. Walley (in litt.) has reached such
a conclusion on Scambus from study of the adults.
Genus Seambus.—S. hispae (Harris) has been examined (fig. 2).
S. brevicornis (Gravenhorst) is figured by Thorpe (1930), S. detritus
‘ (Holmgren) by Salt (1931), S. foliae (Cushman) by Dowden (1941),
and S. pomorum (Ratzeburg) by Imms (1918) and by Speyer (1926).
S. pomorum has neither lobes on the ventral surface of the labial
sclerite nor an enlargement on the hypostoma as has S. hispae. S.
brevicornis, S. foliae and S. detritus have lobes on the ventral surface
of the labial sclerite, but an enlargement is not present on the hypo-
stoma. The ventral surface of the labial sclerite of S. detritus is more
pointed than in other species. These points are of interest since
Tromera pomorum (Ratzeburg) and Epiurus brevicornis (Gravenhorst)
are type species of genera synonymized under Scambus.
Genus Alophosternum.—aA. foliicola Cushman has been examined
(fig. 28). The closing apparatus of the spiracle of this genus differs
from others of the tribe in its long slender shape (fig. 282).
Genus Calliephialtes.—C. nubilipennis (Viereck) and C. variatipes
(Provancher) (fig. 2c) have been examined. Both species possess
ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 405
lobes on the ventral surface of the labial sclerite, which is
slightly pointed. The more posterior part of the hypostoma is
slightly enlarged in C. variatipes but not in C. nubilipennis. The
body setae are conspicuously large in C. nubilipennis. C. dimorphus
Cushman is figured by Sauer (1939) and lobes do not appear to be
present on the ventral surface of the labium, although the figure is
too small to show the head structures clearly.
Genus E’phialtes.—E. irritator (Fabricius) has been examined (fig.
34). E. elegans (Woldstedt) is figured by Beirne (1942a), H. mani-
festor (Linnaeus) by Baumann (1933), “. punctulatus Ratzeburg by
Beirne (1941) and Rosenberg (1934), and #. ruficollis (Gravenhorst)
by Thorpe (1930). All these species have numerous lobes on the
ventral surface of the labial sclerite.
Genus Jseropus.—The species of this genus are gregarious. J.
californicus Cushman and I. stercorator brunneifrons (Viereck) (fig.
3B) have been examined. The enlargement of the hypostoma is more
marked in I. californicus than in I. stercorator brunneifrons. I.
stercorator stercorator (Fabricius) is figured by Beirne (1941).
Genus TJromatobia.—Species of this genus parasitize the egg
cocoons of spiders. TJ. rufopectus (Cresson) (fig. 8c) and 7. zonata
(Davis) have been examined. The head sclerites are slender with
no lobes on the ventral surface of the labium and no enlargement of
the hypostoma. A slight epistoma is visible and teeth appear to be
present only on the dorsal surface of the mandible. Maneval (1936)
notes the presence of groups of large hooked spines on the dorsal
surface of the first seven abdominal segments of Zaglyptus varipes
varipes (Gravenhorst). Similar spines are present on the abdomen
of Tromatobia (fig. 3c3). These spines, which appear to be holdfast
organs, closely resemble the body spines of the Polysphinctini. Like
Trombatobia and Zaglyptus, the Polysphinctini are parasites of spiders.
Genus Delomerista.—The species of this genus are parasites of the
cocoons of sawflies. D. diprionis Cushman has been examined
(fig. 44). The bifurcate mandibles may be distinctive of this genus.
Morris, Cameron, and Jepson (1937) figure Delomerista sp., where the
mandible appears to have the same shape as that of other Ephialtini
and a more or less complete epistoma is present. It is unfortunate
that the identification was not taken further. |
Tribe Polysphinctini
Ficure 5
The members of this tribe are parasites of spiders.
The setae on the head and body are conspicuously long, the setae
on the body being at least as long as the blade of the mandible; the
dorsal part of the epistoma is not sclerotized and the pleurostoma is
406 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
O1mm
Figure 5.—Pimplinae:Polysphinctini, head sclerites: a, Hymenoepimects sp.; B, Oxyrrhexis
carbonator texana (Cresson); c, Zatypota sp., antenna not visible on preparation. (Il,
antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.)
ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 407
lightly sclerotized ; the hypostoma is well sclerotized and in Ozyrrhezis
and Acrodactyla (Beirne, 1941) is expanded at the posterior end;
the hypostomal spur is well sclerotized, as is the stipital sclerite which
is expanded at its posterior end in Hymenoepimecis and Oxyrrhexis;
the labial sclerite is roughly square in shape in Zatypota but roughly
triangular in other genera, although the ventral part of the sclerite
is pointed in Zatypota and Acrodactyla; the maxillary and labial
palps each have one sensillum in Hymenoepimecis, Oxyrrhexis and
Acrodactyla, but there. are two sensilla to each palp in Zatypota;
the labral sclerite is lightly sclerotized in its lateral parts but is
unsclerotized dorsally; the mandible is slender and small teeth are
present on the dorsal surface of the blade; the antenna is papilliform;
the closing apparatus of the spiracle is close to the atrium; long setae
are present on the skin; spines, which appear to serve as holdfast
organs, are present on the dorsal surface of some body segments. It
is not possible to distinguish the precise distribution of these spines
from cast skins. Nielsen (1923, 1935, 1936) figures and describes
the distribution of these spines in the tribe but gives no adequate
figure of the head structure of the larvae.
LARVAL Kry
1. No enlargement present on posterior part of hypostoma . . Hymencepimecis
Enlargement present on posterior part of hypostoma........ 2
2. Lateral end of stipital scleriteexpanded. ... ......... Oxyrrhexis
Lateral end of stipital sclerite not expanded. . .. ........ 3
3. Ventral part of labial sclerite with small dorsal projection into prelabial
ATCA mere cae Seng he ain eae epi, cuktecee Mee EMR, eb when tN odie Zatypota
Ventral part of labial sclerite without dorsal projection. . . . Acrodactyla
The following have been examined: Hymenoepimecis sp. (fig. 5A),
Oxyrrhexis carbonator terana (Cresson) (fig. 5B), and Zatypota sp.
(fig. 5c). Acrodactyla degener (Haliday) is figured by Beirne (1941).
Tribe Pimplini
Figures 6, 7
The members of this tribe are endoparasites of a variety of lepi-
dopterous pupae.
The head sclerites are distinctive in that they appear to form a
ring around the mouth. The epistoma is well sclerotized, except in
Xanthopimpla; the pleurostoma is well sclerotized and the hypostoma
is short in most species; the hypostomal spur is well sclerotized and
the stipital sclerite is short in most species; the labial sclerite is longer
than wide with thin lateral parts and a broadened ventral part;
the mandible is relatively large and has no teeth on the blade; the
labral sclerite is absent and in some genera the sensilla of the labrum
504675592
408 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Ps O-1.mm 3
Figure 6.—Pimplinae:Pimplini, head sclerites: a, Pimpla aequalis Provancher, antenna
not visible on preparation; B, Apechthis compunctor (Linnaeus). (1, antenna; 2, spiracle;
3, skin.)
SHORT | 409
ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE
Figure 7.—Pimplinae:Pimplini, head sclerites: a, Xanthopimpla stemmator (Thunberg);
B, Itoplectis behrensii (Cresson); c, Echthromorpha notulatoria (Fabricius). (1, antenna;
2, spiracle; 3, skin.)
410 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
are grouped on certain raised areas; the hypopharynx has numerous
small spine-like projections; the antenna is disc-shaped with the
circumference lightly sclerotized in some genera, and several sensilla
may be visible in the central part of the antenna; the atrium of the
spiracle is broad and shallow and the closing apparatus is close to the
atrium; the skin is relatively smooth and has small setae.
LaRvaL Kry
1. Hypostomal spur with lightly sclerotized lateral expansion . . Xanthopimpla
Hypostomal spur without lightly sclerotized lateral expansion. . .. . 2
2. Hypostoma approximately equal in length to blade of mandible . Apechthis
Hypostoma much shorter than blade of mandible. . ........ 3
3. Stipital sclerite much shorter than blade of mandible. ..... Itoplectis
Stipital selerite approximately equal in length to blade of mandible. . . 4
. Broadened (ventral) part of labial sclerite about as broad as long and not
pointed? ventrally 9 3 2%. yuh P ean 2 ee ee ee eset ees oe Pimpla
Broadened (ventral) part of labial sclerite longer than wide and pointed
VETIballiy ys 14s, cetaeeeerast wos Se fe? GL mee mee ce et eee eta ereiele Eehthromorpha
=
Genus Pimpla—P. aequalis Provancher (fig. 6A) and P. inflatus
Townes have been examined. P. instigator (Fabricius) is figured by
Beirne (1941) and by Meyer (1922), P. luctunosa Smith by Itawa
(1950), P. turionellae (Linnaeus) by Thorpe (1930), Silvestri (1941),
and Beirne (1943), and Pimpla sp. by Beirne (1942).
Genus Apechthis—A. compunctor (Linnaeus) (fig. 6B) has been
examined. ‘This species is figured by Beirne (1941).
Genus Itoplectis—The species of this genus may be primary or
secondary parasites. Professor Varley (in litt.) informs me that
I. maculator (Fabricius) appears to be more often a primary parasite
on Tortrix and other species, although sometimes a secondary para-
site. J. behrensii (Cresson) (fig. 7B) and J. conquisitor (Say) have
been examined. J. alternans (Gravenhorst) is figured by Morris,
Cameron, and Jepson (1937), J. olivalis Thomson by Beirne (1941),
and Jtoplectis sp. by Snodgrass (1935). Morris, Cameron, and Jepson
(1937) state that the inner aspects of the teeth of J. alternans are
armed with bristles. Teeth have not been recorded on the blade of
the mandible in any other species of this tribe. These authors studied
this species as a primary parasite of Diprion. It oviposited on pre-
pupae and pupae within the host cocoon and fed externally. All
other genera of the Pimplini appear to be endoparasites.
Genus Echthromorpha.—E. insidiator (Smith) and EF. notulatoria
(Fabricius) (fig. 7c) have been examined. £. formosa (Smith) is
figured by Beirne (1941).
Genus Xanthopimpla.—The broad and lightly sclerotized hyposto-
mal spur and the lightly sclerotized epistoma are characteristic of this
genus. The stipital sclerite is short and fused with the hypostomal
ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 411
spur. X. cera (Cameron), X. enderleini Krueger, and X. stemmator
(Thunberg) (fig. 74) have been examined. X. pedator (Thomson),
figured by Beirne (1941), differs from other species of the genus in
that the lateral parts of the labial sclerite are very broad; however,
the hypostomal spur and the stipital sclerite appear to be similar to
those of other species. X. citrina (Holmgren) is figured by Moutia
and Courtois (1952).
Tribe Neoxoridini
FIGuRE 8a
The only species of this tribe examined was Neozorides borealis
(Cresson) (CDA) (fig. 84). Members of this genus are parasites of
wood-boring Coleoptera.
The dorsal part of the epistoma is unsclerotized but the pleurostoma
and hypostoma are well sclerotized; the hypostomal spur has a broad
dorsal part but narrows ventrally where it fuses with the narrow
stipital sclerite; the lateral end of the stipital sclerite is Y-shaped; the
ventral part of the labial sclerite is broad and pointed, although the
point appears as a separate cap on the remainder of the labial sclerite;
the maxillary and labial palps each have two sensilla, one round and
one crescentic in shape; only the lateral parts of the labral sclerite are
well sclerotized; the mandible has a slender blade and a dorsal and
ventral row of small teeth, thus resembling the mandibles of the
Ephialtini, Rhyssini and Labenini; the antenna is papilliform; the
atrium of the spiracle is funnel-shaped and the closing apparatus is
close to the atrium; the skin has setae of moderate size but no spines.
Tribe Rhyssini
Figure 8B
Species of this tribe parasitize wood-boring Coleoptera and sawflies.
The only specimen examined was Rhyssa sp. (fig. 8B).
The dorsal part of the epistoma is not sclerotized and the pleuro-
stoma is lightly sclerotized; the hypostoma and hypostomal spur are
well sclerotized and the hypostomal spur is broad at its dorsal end;
the stipital sclerite is well sclerotized and is broad at its lateral end;
the labial sclerite is sharply pointed ventrally; the maxillary and
labial palps each have two sensilla, one round and one crescentic; the
dorsal part of the labral sclerite is not sclerotized; the mandible has a
slender blade with a dorsal and ventral row of small teeth; there is a
small, lightly sclerotized plate on the clypeus; the antenna is papil-
liform; the atrium of the spiracle is funnel-shaped and the closing
apparatus, which has relatively thick walls, adjoins the atrium; the
skin has setae of moderate size but no spines.
FRhyssa sp. is figured by Beirne (1941).
A12 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Ficure 8.—Pimplinae, head sclerites: a, Neoxorides borealis (Cresson) (Neoxoridini); 8,
Rhyssa sp. (Rhyssini). (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.)
ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 413
Tribe Theroniini
FIGURE 9A
The only species examined was Theronia atalantae (Poda) (fig. 94).
The species of Theronia are usually primary and secondary parasites
of the pupae of Lepidoptera.
The dorsal part of the epistoma is unsclerotized and the pleurostoma
is lightly sclerotized; the hypostoma and hypostomal spur are slender
and well sclerotized; the stipital sclerite is lightly sclerotized and a
very lightly sclerotized cardo is present; the lateral parts of the labial
sclerite are slender and well sclerotized and the ventral part is broad
and lightly sclerotized; each maxillary and labial palp has two sensilla,
one round and one crescentic in shape; the labral sclerite is present;
the mandible has a broad base and the blade is bifurcated with one
part bearing dorsal and ventral teeth and the other, which projects
posteriorly, being toothless; the antenna bears a small papillus; the
closing apparatus of the spiracle has slender walls and adjoins the
atrium; the skin bears setae approximately equal in length to that of
the toothed part of the blade of the mandible and has no spines.
The mandible and the labial sclerite of the final instar larva of T.
atalantae are figured by Meyer (1922).
Tribe Labenini
FiGurE 9B
The only species examined was Labena grallator (Say) (fig. 98).
Species of the genus Labena parasitize wood-boring Coleoptera.
The dorsal part of the epistoma is very faintly sclerotized; the
pleurostoma is well sclerotized and has a lightly sclerotized lateral
expansion; the hypostoma is well sclerotized and has a lightly
sclerotized posterior expansion; the hypostomal spur is well sclerotized ;
the stipital sclerite is V-shaped with its lateral part expanded and
curved dorsally; the labial sclerite is similar in shape to that of many
Ephialtini, but there are no lobes on the ventral surface; on each
maxillary and labial palp there are two sensilla, both round and one
smaller than the other; the labral sclerite is distinctive with each
lateral part bearing a quadrate-shaped expansion and the median
(dorsal) part being unsclerotized except for a small, lightly sclerotized
plate; the antenna is papilliform; the atrium of the spiracle is oval in
shape and the closing apparatus is thick-walled and situated close to
the atrium; the skin has setae of moderate size but no spines.
414 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Ficure 9.—Pimplinae, head sclerites: a, Theronia atalantae (Poda) (Theroniini); B, Labena
grallator (Say) (Labenini). (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.)
ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT A15
Tribe Xoridini
Figure 10a
Species of this tribe parasitize wood-boring Coleoptera.
Xorides insularis (Cresson) and X. rileyi (Ashmead) (fig. 104) have
been examined.
In the genus Xorides the dorsal part of the epistoma is not scle-
rotized, but the pleurostoma, hypostoma, hypostomal spur, and
stipital sclerite are well sclerotized; the labial sclerite is roughly
triangular in shape; the maxillary and labial palps each bear two
sensilla, one round and one crescentic in shape; the labral sclerite
in both species examined does not have the dorsal part sclerotized
and each lateral part consists of two sclerotic bands which join ven-
trally; the mandible is distinctive with a broad blade bearing two rows
of large teeth on the dorsal surface; the antenna is papilliform; the
spiracular atrium is oval in shape and the closing apparatus is close
to the atrium; small setae but no spines are present on the skin.
Ischnoceros rusticus (Geoffroy) is figured by Berine (1941), Xori-
descopus sp. by Ayyar (1943), X. brachylabris (Kriechbaumer) by
Chrystal and Skinner (1931), Xorides praecatorius (Fabricius) by
Beirne (1941), and Xorides sp. by Short (1952). All specimens de-
scribed in the literature appear to have the labral sclerite consisting
only of a single sclerotic band and not double as in the species figured
in the present paper. Chrystal and Skinner show small lobes on the
ventral surface of the labial sclerite of X. brachylabris. The labium
thus resembles those of some Ephialtini. These authors also record
that there is no striking difference between the larva of this species
and that of X. irrigator (Fabricius) which they also examined. These
lobes have not been recorded on the labium of any other species of
this tribe, although Ayyar figures what appears to be a sclerotic plate
beneath the ventral surface of the labial sclerite in Xoridescopus. It
is unfortunate that this figure is poor and on bad paper.
Tribe Acaenitini
Figure 108
Members of this tribe are parasites of wood-boring Coleoptera.
The only species of this tribe examined was Arotes formosus Cresson
(fig. 108). Cushman and Rohwer (1921, p. 392) state that the group
is ectoparasitic. The complete epistoma, toothless mandible and
small skin setae of Arotes suggest that it is an endoparasite, although
the larval characters of Coleocentrus, as figured by Baumann (1933),
suggest that this genus is an ectoparasite.
416 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL. MUSEUM VoL. 110
roo. o>
AY oan oo PN
Oo co
he Erol oa \y: .
i Se eo tay, gal
/
( ,
O-imm 3
Ficure 10.—Pimplinae, head sclerites: a, Xorides rileyi (Ashmead) (Xoridini); B, Arotes
formosus Cresson (Acaenitini), antenna not visible on preparation. (1, antenna; 2,
spiracle; 3, skin.)
ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 417
It has been already noted that the Acaenitini have characters
similar to those of the two groups of the Pimplinae, the Ephialtini
and similar tribes, and the Pimplini.
In the genus Arotes the epistoma and pleurostoma are moderately
sclerotized and broad; the hypostoma is moderately sclerotized but
very slender; the hypostomal spur is broad and very lightly sclerotized ;
the stipital sclerite is short, broad and very lightly sclerotized; the
labial sclerite is roughly triangular in shape, but the ventral part is
much broader than the lateral parts as in the Pimplini; the maxillary
palps each bear one large, round sensillum and a group of smaller
sensilla; each labial palp bears one large round sensillum and one
small sensillum; the labral sclerite is absent and there are two prom-
inent groups of sensilla on the labrum; the mandibles resemble those
of the Pimplini in having a large blade and no teeth; the antennae
were not visible on the specimen; the spiracular atrium is oval, and
the closing apparatus, which is relatively long and with thin walls,
is situated adjacent to the atrium; the skin has very small setae but
no spines.
Coleocentrus excitator (Poda) is figured by Baumann (1933). The
antenna of this species appears to be disc-shaped. The epistoma
appears to be incomplete, but the figure given is too small to make
this point clear.
Subfamily Adelognathinae
Figure 11a
Members of this subfamily are gregarious external parasites on
sawfly larvae. Adelognathus and related genera have been placed
as a tribe of Tryphoninae by some authors. In the present study it
was found necessary to consider this group as a subfamily since the
form of the mandible, the absence of an epistoma and a labral sclerite,
the presence of a prelabial sclerite and of a clearly papilliform an-
tenna '’ and the absence of spines on the skin all separate Adelognathus
from other genera of the Tryphoninae. I have been unable to dis-
cover whether Adelognathus possesses the stalked egg that is charac-
teristic of the Tryphoninae. The ovaries of an adult were examined
and the eggs present did not appear to be stalked.
Adelognathus britannicus Perkins (GCV), A. pallipes (Gravenhorst)
(GCV) and Adelognathus sp. (@CV) were examined.
The dorsal part of the cranium is sufficiently sclerotized to appear
dark; the epistoma is unsclerotized except for small projections above
10 A papilliform antenna is present in Hybophanes scabriculus (Gravenhorst) and Phytodietus pulcherrimus
(Cresson) (Simmonds, 1947) of the Tryphoninae. The antenna was not visible in the specimen of P.
pulcherrimus examined in the present study. In the remainder of the Tryphoninae the antenna is not
papilliform, although a relatively large, rounded sensillum may be present in the middle of the disc-shaped
antenna as in Jdiogramma.
418 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
pam icilamnly all Moab
ii Wea ea IL
{ @ @
B e
wp =O)
ie atine: be a
: A
aus © Nites -
ps
O-imm
1.—Head sclerites: Adelognathus pallipes (Gravenhorst) (Adelognathinae); B,
(Tryphoninae:Phytodietini), antenna not visible on
(Say) (Tryphoninae:Phytodietini). (1, antenna; 2,
Ficure 1
Phytodietus pulcherrimus (Cresson)
preparation; c, Netelia geminatus
spiracle; 3, skin.)
ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 419
the anterior pleurostomal processes; the pleurostoma is lightly scler-
otized; the hypostoma, hypostomal spur and stipital sclerite are well
sclerotized; the labial sclerite is well sclerotized and the lateral parts
meet the ventral almost at right angles; a prelabial sclerite is present;
each maxillary and labial palp bears two sensilla, one round and
one crescentic in shape; the mandibles are distinctive, being large
with a long broad blade having a row of fine teeth on the dorsal edge;
the labral sclerite is absent; the antenna is papilliform; the closing
apparatus of the spiracle is long and slender and is separated from the
atrium by a length of trachea equal in length to the atrium; the skin
bears small setae but no spines; small bubble-like projections are
present on the skin, but these are not pointed and sclerotized as in
the Tryphoninae and cannot be called spines.
Beirne (1941) figures Adelognathus sp. indescr.
Subfamily Tryphoninae
Figures 11B—-13p
Members of this subfamily are ectoparasites and the tribes are
closely related. The eggs are attached to the skin of the host by a
stalk (by other structures in some Cteniscini) and the parasite larva
completes its development in the host cocoon.
The head sclerites are all well developed, although the epistoma is
only slightly sclerotized in the Phytodietini and the prelabial sclerite
is absent; the mandibles are of moderate size and may bear teeth on
the dorsal edge of the blade or teeth may be absent; the antenna is
disc-shaped with one to three sensilla in the center; the closing ap-
paratus of the spiracle is slender and is situated some distance from
the atrium, except in Netelia where the closing apparatus is as broad
as the atrium and adjoins the atrium; large setae and small spines
are present on the skin, except in Hzenterus where the spines are
conspicuously large and are about half as long as the setae.
LarvaL Kry
1. A lightly sclerotized plate is present on the labium ventral to the labial sclerite.
Phytodietini
A lightly sclerotized plate is not present on the labium ventral to the labial
sclerite’= 242 SY SUE ESTEE CL AL Ded TEES, TEED
2. Dorsal part of epistomia najecleratized” - 2... . . . . . Idiogrammatini
Dorsal part of epistoma sclerotized. . . . . Sochy sthieop eee
3. Labial sclerite slender with width much less alan ae of sania sclerite.
Boéthini
Labial sclerite relatively broad with width approximately equal to that of
StiPlcalesCleritet permet cet es Beet n wey veo sema Coane! ss bcc tan neem eee
420 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
4. Mandible without teeth; setae on body with length equal to one-third to one-
halfthat of mandibles. 4.0 ses 2 6) se eee et eee eC Lemiseran
Mandible with teeth," or, if without teeth, then setae on body large with length
equal to approximately three-quarters that of mandible. . ...... 5
5. Mandible with teeth; maxillary and labial palps each with three sensilla, or,
if not, then with two sensilla, one round and one crescentic . . Thymaridini
Mandible without teeth, or, if with teeth, then maxillary and labial palps each
with two sensilla both of which areround . ..... .. . . Tryphonini
Tribe Phytodietini
Figure 118,c
The members of this tribe are parasites of caterpillars. The egg is
attached to the host by a stalk and most of the larval development
occurs after the host spins its cocoon or makes a pupal cell in the
eround.
The lightly sclerotized plate situated on the labium ventral to the
labial sclerite is characteristic of this group. In contrast to the other
tribes of the subfamily the dorsal part of the epistoma is very lightly
sclerotized.
LARVAL KeEry
1. Closing apparatus of spiracle narrow and separated from atrium by a length
of trachea equal to length of closing apparatus. . . . . . . Phytodietus
Closing apparatus of spiracle broad and situated adjacent to atrium . Netelia
Phytodietus pulcherrimus (Cresson) (fig. 118), Netelia exserta (Cush-
man), and N. geminatus (Say) (fig. 11c) have been examined.
The labral sclerite of N. exserta differs from that of N. geminatus
in that the dorsal part consists only of a single sclerotic band and the
lateral parts do not end in forked enlargements. This is of interest
since Townes and Townes (1951) place exserta in the subgenus Pros-
thodocis, whereas geminatus is placed in the subgenus Netelza.
There is a relatively large, round sensillum in the center of the
antenna in Netelia. The sensillum is, however, much smaller than
the papillus of a papilliform antenna, and the antenna of Nef¢elia is
best described as disc-shaped.
Phytodietus pulcherramus (Cresson) is figured by Simmonds (1947),
and P. gelitorius (Thunberg) and Netelia vinulae (Scopoli) are figured
by Beirne (1941). Simmonds does not figure the sclerotized plate on
the labium of P. pulcherrimus. ‘This is presumably an oversight.
Beirne describes a lower row of small teeth near the tip of the blade
of the mandible in Netelia. This row of teeth was not seen in the
species of Netelia examined.
11 Teeth are present on the mandible of Erromenus dolichops Townes and Townes (‘Tryphonini) but they
are very small. This species (fig. 134) may be distinguished from the Cteniscini by the shape of the
mandible.
ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 4?1
Tribe Thymaridini (= Eclytini)
Figure 12,8
Members of this tribe are parasitic mostly on small Lepidoptera.
Eclytus ornatus Holmgren is a parasite of Tenthredinidae.
The species examined were /. ornatus Holmgren (CDA) (fig. 124),
E. pleuralis (Provancher) (CDA), Hybophanes scabriculus (Grav-
enhorst) (GCV) (fig. 128), and Neliopisthus elegans (Ruthe) (GCV).
All the head sclerites are present with the exception of the prelabial
and the dorsal part of the labral sclerite is absent in Hybophanes and
Neliopisthus; the epistoma is slender in Helytus but relatively broad,
although lightly sclerotized, in Hybophanes and Neliopisthus; the lat-
eral parts of the labial sclerite meet the ventral almost at right angles
in Kelytus but the ventral part of this sclerite is rounded in Hybophanes
and Neliopisthus; in Hybophanes and Eclytus ornatus each maxillary
and labial palp has three sensilla, one large, one small and one minute,
but in EF. pleuralis each palp has two sensilla, one round and one cres-
centic; the mandible has a prominent row of teeth on the dorsal sur-
face of the blade; the closing apparatus of the spiracle is small and
the length of trachea which separates it from the atrium is twice as
long as the closing apparatus in Eelytus and three times as long in
Hybophanes and Neliopisthus; the setae on the skin are prominent,
especially in Hybophanes and Neliopisthus, and there are small spines.
Eclytus fontinalis Holmgren is figured by Beirne (1941).
LARVAL KEY
1. Setae on skin of thorax equal in length to blade of mandible . . . . Eelytus
Setae on skin of thorax as long as or longer than hypostoma. ....... 2
2 Epistoma sharply arched. .f so 205 eee yk ye os ew eh Hybophanes
Epistoma not sharply. arched... syne f-fhs 2-5 swe ste SF Neliopisthus
Tribe Idiogrammatini
Figure 12c
Idiogramma sp. was examined. The species of this genus are
parasitic on the larvae of NXyela feeding in the staminate cones of
Pinus. Idiogramma is an isolated genus showing no close resem-
blance to other Tryphoninae.
The dorsal part of the epistoma is unsclerotized; the pleurostoma
is very lightly sclerotized; the hypostoma, hypostomal spur, stipital
sclerite and labial sclerite are moderately sclerotized; each maxulary
and labial palp has two sensilla; there is no prelabial sclerite; the silk
press is very lightly sclerotized; a labral sclerite is present; the man-
dibles are distinctive in shape, each having a somewhat square base
and a curved toothless blade; the antenna has a large central sensillum
t
22 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
sacl siete Sc Daae
KU AAMT aan A AS A
+——_—____+
aK O:imm 3
Ficure 12.—Tryphoninae, head sclerites: a, Eclytus ornatus Holmgren (Thymaridini),
antenna not visible on preparation; B, Hybophanes scabriculus (Gravenhorst) (Thymari-
dini), with skin showing prothoracic setae and spines; c, [diogramma sp. (Idiogrammatini).
(1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.)
ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 423
but is not clearly papilliform; the closing apparatus of the spiracle
is separated from the atrium by a length of trachea approximately
equal to the depth of the atrium; the skin bears small setae and spines.
It is possible that Jdiogramma should be placed in a subfamily
of its own since the shape of the mandible and the incomplete epistoma
separate this genus from other Tryphoninae. However, since the
epistoma is partly sclerotized dorsal to the anterior tentorial pits, a
labral sclerite is present, the antenna is not papilliform, and the
eggs are stalked, the genus has been placed with the Tryphoninae.
The structure of the spiracles and the presence of distinct spines on the
skin are characteristics similar to those of many Tryphoninae. The
characters of Jdiogramma do not resemble those of any other sub-
family of the Ichneumonidae.
Tribe Boéthini
FIGuRE 134
Boéthes sp. was examined. Members of this genus are parasitic on
the larvae of argid sawflies.
All the head sclerites are present with the exception of the prelabial;
the labial sclerite is slender and its lateral parts meet the ventral
almost at right angles; each maxillary and labial palp bears two
sensilla, both round and one large and one small; two groups each of
four sensilla are present on the labrum; the mandibles are without
teeth; the antenna is disc-shaped with a prominent sensillum in the
center; the length of trachea separating the closing apparatus of the
spiracle from the atrium is almost equal to that of the closing appara-
tus; the skin bears large setae and small spines.
Tribe Tryphonini
FIGurRE 138,c
Members of this tribe are parasites of the larvae of Tenthredinidae.
Polyblastus pedalis (Cresson) (CDA) (fig. 133), Hrromenus bedardi
Provancher (CDA), and EF. dolichops Townes and Townes (CDA)
(fig. 13c) have been examined.
All the head sclerites are present with the exception of the pre-
labial; the ventral part of the labial sclerite is pointed or curved so as
to give the sclerite an oval to round appearance; each maxillary and
labial palp bears three sensilla in Pulyblastus and two in Erromenus;
the mandible is without teeth in Polyblastus but has small teeth in
Erromenus: the disc-shaped antenna has two sensilla; the distance of
the closing apparatus of the spiracle from the atrium is about equal
in length to the closing apparatus in Polyblastus, but the distance is
about twice the length of the closing apparatus in Hrromenus: small
spines are present on the skin of both Polyblastus and Hrromenus, but
504675—59 —3
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
424
O:! mm
ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 495
2
Ficure 13.—Head sclerites: a, Boéthes sp. (Tryphoninae:Boéthini); 8, Polyblastus pedalis
(Cresson) (Tryphoninae:Tryphonini); c, Erromenus dolichops Townes and ‘Townes
(Tryphoninae:Tryphonini); p, Exenterus canadensis Provancher (Tryphoninae:Cteniscini) ;
E, Brachycyrtus pretiosus Cushman (Cryptinae:Brachycyrtini), antenna not visible on
preparation. (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.)
426 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VoL. 110
the length of the skin setae is equal to three-quarters of the length
of the mandible in Polyblastus, whereas in Erromenus the setae are
small and equal to one-fifth of the length of the mandible.
LARVAL Kry
1. Mandible without teeth; three sensilla on each maxillary and labial palp.
Polyblastus
Mandible with teeth; two sensilla on each maxillary and labial palp.
Erromenus
Tribe Cteniscini
Figure 13p
Members of this tribe parasitize the larvae of Argidae, Tenth-
redinidae and Diprionidae. LEzenterus abruptorius (Thunberg), £.
adspersus Hartig, £. canadensis Provancher (fig. 13D), H. claripennis
Thomson, and £. tricolor Roman have been examined.
All the head sclerites except the prelabial are present; the lateral
parts of the labial sclerite meet the ventral almost at right angles;
each maxillary and labial palp has two sensilla, both round, one large
and one small; the mandible is without teeth; the antenna is disc-like
and has three prominent sensilla; the closing apparatus of the spiracle
is long and slender and its distance from the atrium is roughly equal
to the length of the closing apparatus; spines are conspicuous on the
skin and their length is about half that of the setae.
The following are figured in the literature: Hxenterus abruptorius
(Thunberg) (Morris, 1937), E. adspersus Hartig (Beirne, 1941), £.
tricolor Roman (Morris, Cameron, and Jepson, 1937).
Subfamily Cryptinae (= Gelinae)
Figures 135-27, 64
Most members of this subfamily are ectoparasites but some are, or
can be, endoparasites. Mr. J. F. Perkins (in litt.) has informed me
that in Polytribaz (Aptesini) the parasites emerge from the pupa of
the host. Rosenberg (1934) states that he reared Cryptus sexannulatus
Gravenhorst and Agrothereutes batavus Vollenhoven from cocoons
within the host pupae, but that when he reared the larvae of these
species they fed externally on host larvae.
In this very uniform group, the head sclerites are, in general, well
developed, although the prelabial sclerite is absent and the epistoma
is very lightly sclerotized and is slender and more or less incomplete
dorsally, except in Gambrus where the dorsal part is broad and com-
plete; the pleurostoma is usually very lightly sclerotized; the labial
ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 427
sclerite is roughly triangular in shape in most genera, but, as stated
below, this sclerite may be circular or otherwise modified; the silk
press is well sclerotized and conspicuous and two small sensilla are
often visible just beneath the external opening of the press; each
maxillary and labial palp usually bears two sensilla, one round and
one crescentic in shape, although three or more sensilla are present
in some genera; the labral sclerite is usually lightly sclerotized in its
dorsal part and this part may be enlarged; the mandibles are rela-
tively small in most genera, except in the Aptesini where they are
of moderate size; teeth may be present on the dorsal and ventral
surfaces of the blade of the mandible, on the dorsal surface only, or
teeth may be absent; the antenna is usually papilliform, although
it is disc-shaped in some Hemitelini; the closing apparatus of the
spiracle may be some distance from the atrium or it may be close to
the atrium; the skin bears setae and small projections which may be
sufficiently sclerotized to appear as spines.
LARVAL Kry
1. Hypostoma posterior to hypostomal spur shorter than hypostomal spur.
Brachycyrtini
Hypostoma posterior to hypostomal spur at least as long as hypostomal spur. .2
2. Mandible with a long slender blade bearing a row of fine teeth along entire
lengthrofidorsal surfacentit “tse 6s ss ee oye eee oa
Mandible not of thisform .. . Seen re
3. Teeth on dorsal surface of blade ‘or mendinle eee ihan fectte on ventral
surface!2 which are very small and few in number, except in Ihembobius
(fig. 214) where the blade of the mandible is short, broad and well sclerotized
with length equal to one third of that of base of mandible and width of
lateral end equal to one third of width of base ... . . . . Aptesini
If teeth present on dorsal and ventral surfaces of blade of eons and teeth
on dorsal surface markedly larger than teeth of ventral surface, then ventral
teeth numerous and blade of mandible longer and more slender than in
Rhembobius, with length greater than one third of that of base of mandible
and with width of lateral end less than one third of thatofbase ..... 4
4. Closing apparatus of spiracle separated from atrium by length of trachea at
least equal to length of closing apparatus, or, if not, then epistoma not
sclerotized dorsal to anterior tentorial pits . ...... . . Hemitelini
Closing apparatus of spiracle adjoining atrium, or if not, then at least part
of epistoma dorsal to anterior tentorial pits lightly sclerotized 14. . Cryptini
12 Except Cubocephalus where the form and position of the closing apparatus of the spiracle differentiates
this genus from Cryptini with a similar type of mandible and either the form of the labial sclerite or the
form and position of the closing apparatus of the spiracle differentiates this genus from Hemitelini with
a similar type of mandible.
18 Except Trychosis, Mallochia and Lymeon (Cryptini). The following characters will distinguish these
genera from the Aptesini: the form of the labial sclerite in Trychosis, the sharp dorsal bend of the lateral end
of the stipital sclerite in Mallochia, and the heart-shaped dorsal sensillum on each labial palp in Lymeon.
14 Except Pseudischnus.
428 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Tribe Brachycyrtini
FIGURE 13,5
Brachycyrtus pretiosus Cushman (fig. 13,5) was examined.
Members of the genus Brachycyrtus are parasitic in the cocoons of
Chrysopidae. The Brachycyrtini have been placed by some authors
in a tribe of the Pimplinae. From a study of the adults, Walkley
(1956) reached the conclusion that the group fits best in the Cryptinae,
but that additional material and knowledge might prove that it
belongs in a subfamily of its own. The larval characters support this
conclusion. The form of the mandibles and head sclerites resemble
those of the Cryptinae rather than any other group. The position
of the hypostomal spur differs from that of the Pimplinae other than
the Labenini and Xoridini. The form of the labral sclerite differs
from that of the Labenini. The form of the mandible differs from
that of the Xoridini in that the blade is relatively longer. The
group is an isolated one on larval characters, and the short hypos-
toma is distinctive. The form of the hypostoma resembles that of
the Sphecophagini to some extent, although the hypostoma of the
Brachycyrtini is considerably shorter than that of the Sphecophagini.
The head of Brachycyrtus is small and delicate and the antenna was
not clearly visible on the preparations made. It appears to be
dise-shaped.
Tribe Hemitelini (= Gelini)
Fiaures 14-19, 64
Members of this tribe attack a great variety of hosts. Many are
occasionally or habitually secondary parasites. The most conspicuous
characters of the tribe are the poorly developed epistoma and the
distance of the closing apparatus of the spiracle from the atrium.
LARVAL Kry
1. Mandible without teeth .
Mandible with teeth . ait :
2. Each ventrolateral part of labial aclnite eeeaieds
Labial sclerite not of this shape .
3. Ventral end of hypostomal spur broader than orsale
Isdromas peruviana (Viereck)
Own bd
Ventral end of hypostomal spur narrower than dorsal. . . ‘ 4
4. Mandibles with relatively broad blades, the tips of which da non sce in
the median line. . . . . . . . . Isdromas lycaenze (Howard)
Mandibles with relatively narrow ipiedes the tips of which meet in the median
line! asexcivaets So a ale See. Joos: RE AOe, diek copie ee ar
5. Dorsal part of abel nalerite moneda bo aed dé Ac Aten ere Srilpaus
Dorsal part of labral sclerite not pointed. ....... . . Atractodes
10.
Wale
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
1
18.
ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 429
. Labial sclerite round in shape and with lateral parts not meeting ventral
approximately atright angles... . ... . . Thaumatotypus
Labial sclerite not round in shape and aii lateral parts meeting ventral
approximately atrightangles. .. . ... . . Phygadeuvon
. Mandible with teeth only on dorsal eeniace of pie THe Coe at, rae! TS
Mandible with teeth on dorsal and ventral surfaces of blade ™. .... I1
. Teeth few in number and relatively large. . . .... =... +. Bathythrix
Teeth smallandfine. .. . Aapaney Mtaaee et Ge ae,
. Two sensilla present on each masilary acl fatal palp ... . . Otacustes
Sensilla not as above. .. . Rois ha, tee teeny MUD
Three sensilla, two large amd! one ervey meet on each maxillary and
aisle pallor eg ses el osc ... . . Mastrus molestae (Uchida)
One large sensillum civuated dort and two or three small sensilla situated
ventrally in the form of a crescent on each maxillary and labial palp.
Thysiotorus
Labial sclerite approximately circularin shape. ..... . . Ethelurgus
Labial sclerite not approximately circular in shape; lateral parts meet ventral
approximately at right angles... . Ao ds ocean ble
Papillus of antenna reduced to disc feanne three Pane sada a Say foe eel selaix
Antenna not of thisshape. .. . UL eee areas
Two sensilla present on each mamiltars and labial Saree SR SOM ee (5)
Sensilla not as above. . . . HR er
Two sensilla of equal size Poeeee eile one or tive sivatlcn seviciiln present on
each maxillary and labial palp. ... . Marae oe es:
One large ventral sensillum and a dorsal group Ge prince sensilla present on
each maxillary and labial palp. . . . . . . Mastrus smithii (Packard)
Dorsal sensillum on each maxillary and labial palp larger than ventral.
Endasys
Dorsal sensillum on each maxillary and labial palp smaller than ventral or
equal in size to ventral. .... ray oop doe ees Gee LO
Pleurostoma more lightly sclerotized than enoctonay
Gelis tantillus (Cresson)
Pleurostoma as well sclerotized as hypostoma............ 17
Labral sclerite with single median expansion. . . ... . . Hemiteles
Labral sclerite not expanded in its median part and w an two small dorsolateral
expansions. . . . . . . Mastrus argeae (Viereck)
Mandible with raanded oe And rebar short blade.
Gelis bruesii (Strickland)
Mandible with a conical base and relatively long slender blade . . Phobetes
Of the characters used in the above key, the form of the labral
sclerite and its degree of sclerotization is not a good one. In some cases
the character is clear, but in others it may be obscured when the entire
length of the sclerite has not been forced into the one plane during
mounting. However, since the tribe is extremely uniform and the
labral sclerite does differ in shape and degree of sclerotization in dif-
ferent genera, it was found necessary to use this character.
15 Teeth on the ventral surface of the blade of the mandible are usually very small and must be looked for
with great care.
430 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
) fronmli
J i
Be Ge > ye
2 O:1mm 3
Ficure 14.—Cryptinae:Hemitelini, head sclerites: a, Bathythrix sp., antenna not visible on
preparation; B, Mastrus molestae (Uchida); c, Otacustes sp. (1, antenna, 2, spiracle;
3, skin.)
ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 431
BA enon Od
Ba SRR RASS
O-1mm
Ficure 15.—Cryptinae:Hemitelini, head sclerites: a, Ethelurgus syrphicola (Ashmead); B,
Isdromas peruviana (Viereck); c, Isdromas lycaenae (Howard). (1, antenna; 2, spiracle;
3, skin.)
432 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
2 O:-1 mm 3
Ficure 16.—Cryptinae:Hemitelini, head sclerites: a, Thaumatotypus paradoxus (Zetter-
stedt); B, Phobetes thyridopteryx (Riley). (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.)
ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 433
wan bn nb —-
Raieyai~ Tn laliwn
a Nox
Ficure 17.—Cryptinae:Hemitelini, head sclerites: a, Gelis tantillus (Cresson); 8, Hemiteles
areator (Panzer); c, Endasys subclavatus (Say). (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.)
434 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
3
2 O-tmm
Figure 18.—Cryptinae:Hemitelini, head sclerites: a, Thysiotorus sp.; B, Phygadeuon
subfuscus Cresson; c, Iselix sp. (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.)
ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 435
a
Ficure 19.—Cryptinae:Hemitelini, head sclerites: Stilpnus anthomyidiperda Viereck.
(1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.)
+}
O:-{mm 3
The following have been examined: Bathythriz sp. (fig. 14a),
Mastrus argeae (Viereck), M. molestae (Uchida) (fig. 148), M. smithii
(Packard), Otacustes sp. (fig. 14c), Ethelurgus syrphicola (Ashmead)
(fig. 154), [sdromas peruviana (Viereck) (fig. 158), I. lycaenae (How-
ard) (fig. 15c), Thawmatotypus paradoxus (Zetterstedt) (fig. 16a),
Phobetes thyridopteryx (Riley) (fig. 168), Gelis bruesit (Strickland),
G. tantillus (Cresson) (fig. 174), Hemiteles areator (Panzer) (fig. 178),
Endasys subclavatus (Say) (fig. 17c), Thysiotorus sp. (fig. 184), Phy-
gadeuon subfuscus Cresson (fig. 188), Jseliz sp. (fig. 18c), Stilpnus
anthomyidiperda Viereck (fig. 194), Atractodes sp. (GCV) (fig. 64a).
Of these specimens, Mastrus molestae (Uchida) differs from the other
species of this genus examined in that the mandibular teeth are small
and are present only on the dorsal surface of the blade. M. smithii
(Packard) has one large sensillum and a group of smaller sensilla on each
maxillary and labial palp and M. argeae (Viereck) two sensilla. In
the two species of /sdromas examined the mandible is basically similar
and the ventrolateral part of each labial sclerite is expanded. There
are, however, many differences between these species. The larval
characters of Gelis, Hemiteles, and Endasys indicate a close relation-
ship. Members of the genus Gelis attack various small cocoons,
436 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
including those of Ichneumonidae and Braconidae, and many para-
sitize the egg cocoons of spiders.
Phygadeuon, Iselix, Stilpnus, and Atractodes resemble each other in
larval characters and all are parasites of muscoid Diptera. Dis-
tinctive features of Atractodes are that the head and the base of the
mandibles are lightly sclerotized and the well-sclerotized blade of the
mandible is toothless, the several very small ridges present on the
dorsal surface of the blade not being distinct enough to be called teeth.
The antenna, like that of Stilpnus, is disc-shaped, but Stdpnus differs
from Atractodes not only in the key characters but also in having the
blade of the mandible more slender, the ventral part of the labial
sclerite more sharply narrowed in the median line, and the posterior
end of the hypostoma straight instead of slightly bent towards the dor-
sal surface (compare figs. 19 and 64).
The following are figured in the literature: Otacustes crassus
patruelis (Cushman) (Clancy, 1946), Gelis melanocephala (Schrank)
(Beirne, 1941), G. tenellus (Say) (Clancy, 1946), Hemiteles areator
(Panzer) (Morris, Cameron, and Jepson, 1937), H. hemipterus (Fab-
ricius) (Salt, 1931), H. simillimus (Taschenberg) (Blunk, 1952).
Tribe Aptesini
Figures 20-214
Most of the members of this tribe are parasites of sawflies. Char-
acteristics of the larvae are the development of the lateral parts of the
epistoma dorsal to the anterior tentorial pits and the relatively large
mandibles. The teeth on the dorsal surface of the blade of the mandi-
ble are larger than the teeth on the ventral surface in Aptesis and
Rhembobius but not in Cubocephalus.
LARVAL Kry
1. Teeth on the dorsal surface of the blade of the mandible not markedly larger
than: teeth: on.the) ventral'surface 4.1 ..4t) dimen}. 2195: Cubocephalus
Teeth on dorsal surface. of blade of mandible larger than teeth on ventral
STITEACC ccs sisiate Mae yea Ive oe yon hata artes nas ha dads ec bed sos sonics Elec aeis AoE 2
2. Blade of mandible short, broad, and well-sclerotized, with length approximately
equal to one-third of that of base of mandible. . ... . Rhembobius
Blade of mandible relatively slender with length approximately equal to one-
halfi of thatoftbase of mandible 4 Ou.u WiUAsTe GEIR: 8G 28 e Aptesis
The following have been examined: Cubocephalus sp. (fig. 20a),
Aptesis indistincta (Provancher) (fig. 20B), A. pteronorum (Graven-
horst), and Rhembobius abdominalis (Provancher) (fig. 214).
The teeth on the dorsal surface of the blade of the mandible of A.
pteronorum are smaller than in A. indistincta.
ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 437
teh A (SAUL A
on
O:imm 3
Ficure 20.—Cryptinae:Aptesini, head sclerites: a, Cubocephalus sp.; B, Aptesis indistincta
(Provancher). (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.)
438 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
t—————II
O:1mm 3
Ficure 21.—Cryptinae, head sclerites: a, Rhembobius abdominalis (Provancher) (Aptesini);
B, Sphecophaga thuringiaca Schmiedeknecht (Sphecophagini). (1, antenna; 2, spiracle;
3, skin.)
ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 439
The following are figured in the literature: Cubocephalus abdominator
(Gravenhorst) (Rosenberg, 1934), C. brumatae (Silvestri) (Silvestri,
1941), Aptesis basizonia (Gravenhorst) (Morris, Cameron, and Jepson,
1937).
Tribe Sphecophagini
Figure 2138
Members of this tribe are parasitic in the nests of Vespula and
Polistes.
The mandible is characteristic with its long slender blade bearing a
row of fine teeth along the entire length of the dorsal surface.
Sphecophaga thuringiaca Schmiedeknecht (BM) (fig. 2138) and
Sphecophaga sp. (CDA) were examined.
Sphecophaga vesparum (Curtis) is figured by Beirne (1941) and
Sphecophaga sp. by Snodgrass (1935).
Tribe Cryptini (= Mesostenini)
FIGURES 22-27
Members of this tribe are parasitic mostly on pupae and prepupae,
or on larvae concealed in tunnels or leaf rolls. Hosts include Lepi-
doptera, Symphyta, Aculeata, and spider eggs.
The larvae have the lateral parts of the epistoma well developed
and, in many genera, the closing apparatus of the spiracle adjoins the
atrium.
LarvaL Kry
1. Epistoma lightly sclerotized, broad and complete. . ... . . Gambrus
Epistoma lightly sclerotized, narrow and more or less incomplete dorsally . 2
2. Labial sclerite with each ventrolateral part indented... . . Trychosis
Labial sclerite not of thisform .. . Me AAPG Zar Weteo uclg har eee ete
3. Closing apparatus of spiracle adjoining Meriuea: Sis et ERM alter e ese:
Closing appratus of spiracle not adjoining atrium. . . Selena LO
4. Dorsal part of labral sclerite expanded into three Henly pclenotized lobes.
Cryptus
Dorsal part of labial scleritenot-of thisformys.. . <<... . 205... 2°98
Deapixisetac) On prelabium™“2-prnes sas noma es. Bech a fis Sl, odes aes) 6
Four setae on prelabium. .. . s Aa A ot ands
6. Median-dorsal part of labral sclerite sah Honl, pelerotiaed enlancement!
Goryphus
Median-dorsal part of labral sclerite without enlargement .. . . Mesostenus
7. Dorsal part of labral sclerite divided into two lightly sclerotized bars.
Polycyrtus
Dorsal part of labral sclerite not divided into two bars. ....... 8
8. Mandible with a relatively slender blade bearing a row of fine teeth on the
dorsal surface and teeth on ventral surface few and small. . Mallechia
Mandiblemotvotthis forms \hemae ee ff eas SR pad ee Rucae eee Ono
504675—59—_4
440 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
———} ;
O:1mm 3
2 qv
Figure 22.—Cryptinae:Cryptini, head sclerites: a, Cryptus albitarsus albitarsus (Cresson);
B, Mesostenus sp. nr. gracilis Cresson; c, Polycyrtus semialbus (Cresson), antenna not
visible on preparation. (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.)
ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 44]
Figure 23.—Cryptinae:Cryptini, head sclerites: a, Trychosis sp.; B, Gambrus canadensis
(Provancher). (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.)
442 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
b °
ee
’ — Stes 1
Cc
ce
e
Deane
O-{mm 2 b--nene
Ficure 24.—Cryptinae:Cryptini, head sclerites: a, Goryphus inferus (Szepligeti); 8, Hoplo-
cryptus incertulus Cushman, antenna not visible on preparation. (1, antenna; 2, spiracle;
3, skin.)
ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 443
SS
O-imm
2 i)
Ficure 25.—Cryptinae:Cryptini, head sclerites: Nippocrypius suzukii (Matsumura)
(1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.)
| Bey Ae a el a el
a a ~ =~ Ce
9. Width of closing Se of spiracle ee equal to half width of
SUEMUMA es ass . .. . . Agrothereutes
Width of closing AOD atts of Asn more filan half width of atrium.
Eripternimeorpha
10. Ventral row of teeth on mandible poorly developed. . . . .. . Lymeon
Ventral row of teeth on mandible well developed. . ... . ae pte meerralel|
11. Epistoma not sclerotized dorsal to anterior tentorial pits . . . Pestiditehens
Epistoma sclerotized dorsal to anterior tentorial pits... . eco ereap les
12. Six large setae on labrum... . Re MEN re Bea F otc hs Hoplocryptus
More than six large setae on jabrum ee ae eae rae
13. Dorsal part of labral sclerite with three fences Releronzed inpes . . Echthrus
Dorsal part of labral sclerite with one lightly sclerotized lobe . Nippoecryptus
The following have been examined: Cryptus albitarsus albitarsus
(Cresson) (fig. 22a), Mesostenus gracilis Cresson, Mesostenus sp. nr
gracilis Cresson (fig. 228), Polycyrtus semialbus (Cresson) (fig. 22c),
Trychosis sp. (fig. 234), Gambrus canadensis (Provancher) (fig. 238), @
stokesi Cameron, Goryphus inferus (Szepligeti) (fig. 244), Hoplocryptus
incertulus Cushman (fig. 248), Nippocryptus suzukii (Matsumura)
(fig. 25a), as bana At
a
a in Raa
_————
O:{ mm
Ficure 58.—Ophioninae:Cremastini, head sclerites: a, Cremastus ferrugineus Davis;
B, Eiphosoma batatae Cushman. (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.)
ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 495
the labial sclerite is incomplete ventrally. The skin is lightly sclero-
tized with small projections and small setae.
LARVAL Key
1. Each lateral part of the labial sclerite with a small projection towards the
MECIANGMMC. Usp rend slowest TRE pee ke hae ari ae ica Eiphosoma
Each lateral part of labial sclerite without small projection towards median
VaTIG irs: 5 Se rectpeeir eh ogee hen then ad ue is be aera es 2
2. A very lightly sclerotized epistoma present. . . Zaleptopygus, Cremastus
pistomarnot sclerotized, 4s <2 2 Bee us oC A a 3
3. Hypostoma bent in the middle of itslength. ........ Pristomerus
Hypostoma bent at point one third of length from median end . Xiphosomella
Pristomerus euryptychiae Ashmead differs from the drawing in figure
57A in that there are two groups each of two sensilla on the labrum.
Cremastus minor Cushman differs from the drawing in figure 58a in
that the ventral part of the labial sclerite is lightly sclerotized.
It was not found possible to differentiate Zaleptopygus and Cremas-
tus on larval characters.
The following have been examined: Pristomerus austrinus (Townes
and Townes), P. euryptychiae Ashmead, P. pacificus appalachianus
Viereck, P. vulnerator (Panzer) (fig. 574), Xtphosomella stenomae
Cushman (fig. 578), Zaleptopygus flavo-orbitalis (Cameron) (fig. 57¢),
Z. gallaecola (Cushman), Z. rosae (Cushman), Zaleptopygus sp.,
Cremastus carpocapsae Cushman, C. epagoges Cushman, C. facilis
(Cresson), C. ferrugineus Davis (fig. 584), C. forbesi Weed, C. minor
Cushman, Hiphosoma annulatum Cresson, E. batatae Cushman (fig.
588), H. insularis (Viereck), E. texcanum Cresson.
The following are figured in the literature: Pristomerus vulnerator
(Panzer) (Goidanich, 1931; Rosenberg, 1934), Zaleptopygus flavo-
orbitalis (Cameron) (Bradley and Burgess, 1934), Cremastus interruptor
Gravenhorst (Thorpe, 1930; Beirne, 1941).
Tribe Tersilochini
FIGuRE 59
This tribe, the larvae of which are endoparasites, resembles the
Cremastini and many Campoplegini in essential structure, but the
mandible is distinctive with its conical shape and small tooth at the
apex. The head sclerites are slender and lightly sclerotized. As in
most Cremastini, the stipital sclerite has no lateral expansion. The
labial sclerite is broader than long and is incomplete ventrally. The
ventral part of the prelabial sclerite is absent and several large sensilla
are present on the ventral edge of this sclerite. The maxillary and
labial palps are relatively large. The spiracle is of the usual shape in
the Ophioninae with a lightly sclerotized closing apparatus adjoining
496 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
D
Ry cee
—
y ¢ YEA Ase
Da Soa: =
2 ———| 3
Figure 59.—Ophioninae:Tersilochini, head sclerites: Tersilochus argentinensts (Blanchard)
(antenna not visible on preparation; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.)
the atrium. The skin has relatively long setae, approximately equal
in length to one-third the length of the mandible, but the projections
on the skin are small.
Tersilochus argentinensis (Blanchard) (fig. 59) and J. conotracheli
(Riley) were examined. IT. conotracheli is figured by Cushman (1916)
and Tersilochus sp. by Beirne (1941).
Tribe Ophionini
Fiaure 60 a, B
Members of this tribe are endoparasitic in larger caterpillars, except
that Ophion bifoveolatus Brullé is known to parasitize larvae of Phyl-
lophaga (Scarabeidae). Species of Ophion and Enicospilus are noc-
turnal or crepuscular and are frequently attracted to lights.
This is a distinctive tribe although it resembles other tribes of the
Ophioninae in many basic features. The head sclerites are broad
and moderately sclerotized. The stipital sclerite has a small lateral
expansion and a lightly sclerotized cardo is present. The ventral
part of the labial sclerite forms a broad plate. The prelabial sclerite
is triangular in shape with the ventral part reduced. Numerous
setae are present on the labrum, on the maxilla lateral to the hypos-
tomal spur and on the prelabial membrane and the labial sclerite.
The mandibles are distinctive, being relatively small and with a
rounded base and a slightly or strongly curved blade. The antenna
is disc-shaped. The closing apparatus of the spiracle is lightly
sclerotized and adjoins the atrium. The skin has very small setae
and small projections.
ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 497
2
Ficure 60.—a, x, Ophioninae:Ophionini, head sclerites: A, Ophion idoneum Viereck; B, Eni-
cospilus arcuatus (Felt). c, Anomalinae:Anomalini, head sclerites, Anomalon sp., antenna
not visible on preparation. (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.)
498 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
=
ee a a
pit CSE ts
3
O-1mm
Ficure 61.—Anomalinae:Gravenhorstiini, head sclerites: a, Aphanistes hyalinus (Norton),
antenna not visible on preparation; 8, Barylypa insidiator (Foerster), antenna not visible
on preparation; c, Labrorychus analis (Say). (1, antenna; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.)
ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 499
See ee
Arn er AA SARE EAT
A AAR ARRS
NO.
Ficure 62.—Anomalinae: Gravenhorstiini, head sclerites: a, Atrometus clavipes (Davis);
B, Agrypon sp.; c, Blaptocampus nigricornis (Wesmael). (Antenna not visible on prepara-
tion; 2, spiracle; 3, skin.)
500 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
O:imm
Ficure 63.—Anomalinae:Therionini, head sclerites: a, Therion circumflexum (Linnaeus);
B, Heteropelma fulvicorne Townes, antenna not visible on preparation. (1, antenna;
2, spiracle; 3, skin.) .
ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 501
LARVAL KEY
ie Mandible) witht bladetshehbthyycurved( $6 2.)05 if)2 fy exude) Se cya. ne Ophion
Mandible with blade strongly curved so that the tip points dorsally.
Enicespilus
The following were examined: Ophion ancyloneura Cameron,
O. bilineatus Say, O. idoneus Viereck (fig. 60a), O. tetyri Packard,
Enicospilus americanus (Christ), /. arcuatus (Felt) (fig. 608), E.
glabratus (Say), EH. horsfeldi Cameron, E. purgatus (Say), 7. texranus
(Ashmead), and Enicospilus spp.
In Enicospilus americanus the blade of the mandible, although of
the Enicospilus form, is not so strongly curved as in figure 608. A
lightly sclerotized plate is present on the ventral edge of the labrum
of some species of Hnicospilus. This should not be confused with
the suspensorium of the hypopharynx which is also visible in several
species.
The following are figured in the literature: Thyreodon atricolor
(Olivier) (Cushman, 1947), Enicospilus macrurus (Drury) (Beirne,
1941), FE. purgatus (Say) (Cushman, 1947), Enicospilus sp. (Moutia
and Courtois, 1952), and Ophion idoneus Viereck (Cushman, 1947).
Subfamily Anomalinae
Fiaures 60c-63
This endoparasitic group usually has been placed as a tribe of the
Ophioninae. The larval characters of those species examined differ
markedly from the characters of the Ophioninae and the group has
therefore been treated as a separate subfamily. The form of the
labial sclerite is generally similar in the Anomalinae and Ophioninae
and, although this might indicate some sort of general relationship
between the two groups, the form of the remaining sclerites and the
mandibles differs sharply.
The epistoma, pleurostoma, and hypostoma are broad and well
sclerotized; the hypostomal spur is absent; the stipital sclerite curves
dorsally from the labial sclerite to meet the hypostoma; the labial
sclerite is relatively slender and is incomplete ventrally except in
Anomalon where the ventral part is moderately sclerotized, and
in Heteropelma where the ventral part is very lightly sclerotized; the
maxillary and labial palps each have two sensilla, one large and one
small, except in Anomalon where the two sensilla are approximately
equal in size, the dorsal being flat and the ventral peglike; the silk
press is sclerotized; a lightly sclerotized prelabial sclerite which lacks
a ventral projection is present in some genera; the labral sclerite is
absent, but large sensilla which are grouped in various patterns are
present on the labral area; setae are reduced and labral and prelabial
setae appear to be absent except in Anomalon; the mandibles are
large with relatively straight blades which lack teeth except in
502 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL, 110
Anomalon, and the blade of each mandible is well sclerotized; the
antenna is disc-shaped; the closing apparatus of the spiracle is lightly
sclerotized and adjoins the atrium; the skin has small projections
and small setae.
The larval characters of the Anomalinae are strikingly like those
of the Metopiinae. The larvae of the two subfamilies may be distin-
guished by the presence of setae on the prelabium of the Metopiinae
and the absence of these setae in the Anomalinae except Anomalon,
a genus having so many special features as to be readily recognizable.
The reduction of the labial sclerite and hypostomal spur in the
Anomalinae, Metopiinae, and Ichneumoninae might be correlated
with the relatively slight cocoon spun by these endoparasites. In
the head of the final instar larva of Xorides muscles are present which
insert on the labial sclerite (Short, 1952, p. 41, fig. 8a). The con-
traction of these muscles tilts forward the dorsal end of the pre-
labium with the opening of the silk glands. In this action the labial
sclerite rotates on the extremities of the stipital sclerites. The
labial sclerite is thus held so that movement can take place in only
one plane. The spurs of the hypostomae, which articulate with the
stipital sclerites, hold the maxillae rigid. The spinning of the cocoon
has been observed in Xorides and the region of the prelabium contain-
ing the opening of the silk glands was tilted forward during this
process. It is therefore possible that the reduction of a cocoon is
accompanied by a reduction of the muscles which evert the dorsal
end of the prelabium and a reduction of the labial sclerite and hypos-
tomal spur. One objection to this suggestion is that the Pimplini,
which emerge from the pupa of a lepidopterous host and have only
a slight cocoon, have a well developed hypostomal spur and labial
sclerite. However the stipital sclerite is reduced and this might
be associated with the reduction of the cocoon since, when being
everted, the labial sclerite rotates on the stipital sclerite.
LARVAL Kry
1. Blade of mandible with teeth; setae on prelabium....... Anomalini
Blade of mandible without teeth; setae absent from prelabium... . 2
2. Width of epistoma along entire length and width of pleurostoma along entire
length equal to at least half length of mandible. ...... Therionini
Width of epistoma or part of width of pleurostoma less than length of man-
ible Zaee Oe Vo NSE A aay adore ome ete Gravenhorstiini
Ophionellini ”
Tribe Anomalini
Figure 60c
The general form of the head sclerites, spiracles, and skin places
Anomalon with the genera of the tribes Gravenhorstiini and Therionini;
29 Of Cushman (1947).
ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 503
but it does not appear to be a close relationship, a conclusion which
Walkley (in litt.) has also reached from study of the adults. Anomalon
differs from the other Anomalinae examined in that the blade of the
mandible bears distinct teeth; there are setae on the prelabium; and
the ventral part of the labial sclerite, although not as well sclerotized
as the lateral parts, is nevertheless distinctly sclerotized. It is also
possible that the hypostomal spur might be represented in Anomalon
by a small projection from the anteroventral part of the hypostoma.
Anomalon therefore can be considered to have an isolated position
within the Anomalinae. The larval habits also distinguish this genus
from other Anomalinae in that larvae of Elateridae appear to be the
usual hosts, whereas the hosts of the other Anomalinae examined were
lepidopterous.
Anomalon sp. (60c) was examined. A. eyuncidum Say is figured by
Cushman (1947).
Tribe Ophionellini
Ophionellus foutst (Cushman) is figured by Cushman (1947). This
figure is not sufficiently detailed to allow the Ophionellini to be dis-
tinguished from the Gravenhorstiini.
Tribe Gravenhorstiini
Fiaures 61, 62
LARVAL Kry
1. Labral sensilla arranged in two separate groups. ... . . . . Atrometus
Labral sensilla arranged in single line... . a ane”
2. When head sclerites mounted flat on slide then siete ends a hypostomae
extend to point approximately level with ventral end of labial sclerite . . 3
When head sclerites mounted flat on slide then posterior ends of hypostomae
do not extend to point level with ventral end of labial sclerite. . ... 4
3. Width of pleurostoma at anterior pleurostomal process approximately equal
to two-thirds length of mandible. . .. . ... . . Aphanistes
Width of pleurostoma at anterior plearostoreal neoges much less than two-
thirds length of mandible. . .. . . . . . . Labrorychus
4. Hypostoma with sclerotized expansion Alone encire dorsal edge . . Barylypa
Hypostoma without sclerotized expansion along entire dorsal edge. . . . 5
5. Length of blade of mandible less than half width of base and arising from
ventral surface of base. . . . . . . Blaptocampus
Length of blade of mandible arorna tele equal Ko half width of base and
arising from* middie of bases. 2th). 2. ee. Oe 2 SY Agrypon
The following have been examined: Aphanistes hyalinus (Norton)
(fig. 614), Barylypa insidiator (Foerster) (fig. 618), Labrorychus analis
(Say) (fig. 61c), ZL. prismaticus (Norton), Labrorychus sp., Atrometus
clavipes (Davis) (fig. 624), Agrypon sp. (fig. 628), Blaptocampus
nigricornis (Wesmael) (GCV) (fig. 62c).
504675—59 8
504 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
The following are figured in the literature: Trichomma enecator
(Rossi) (Rosenberg, 1934), Aphanistes armatus (Wesmael) (Beirne,
1941), Blaptocampus nigricornis (Wesmael) (Beirne, 1941).
Tribe Therionini
Figure 63
LarvAL Kry
1. Ventral part of labial sclerite lightly sclerotized. ...... Heteropelma
Ventral part of labial sclerite not sclerotized. .......... Therion
The following have been examined: Therion morio (Fabricius),
T. circumflecum (Linnaeus) (fig. 63a), Heteropelma fulvicorne Townes
(fig. 638). Therion morio (Fabricius) is figured by Cushman (1947).
Interrelationships between the Subfamilies
Although in many cases the larval characters suggest interrelation-
ships which are very similar to those which are believed to be shown
by the characters of the adults, there are certain discrepancies.
Some similar adults, such as the Pimplini and Ephialtini, have very
different larvae. These differences may be correlated with the fact
that the larvae of the Pimplini are endoparasitic while those of the
Ephialtini are ectoparasitic. The larval characters of the Ephialtini
and similar tribes of the Pimplinae resemble those of other ectopara-
sites such as the Tryphoninae and Cryptinae rather than the Pimplini.
There are certain structural features which appear to be connected
with whether the larva is an ectoparasite or an endoparasite. The
antenna in most ectoparasites is papilliform. In most endoparasites
it is reduced and disc-like. ‘The mandible is toothed in most ecto-
parasites where teeth are necessary for holding on to the host and
for piercing the host skin. In most endoparasites the mandible is
without teeth. The labral sclerite is present in most ectoparasites
and absent in most endoparasites. The epistoma and the labral
sclerite are rarely present together, except in the Tryphoninae, where
the epistoma is slender. It is difficult to suggest a reason for this.
The anterior retractor muscles of the labrum insert on the median
part of the labral sclerite (Short, 1952, p. 39, fig. 7B). It is not
likely that the labral sclerite could brace the cranium in any way as
a substitute for the epistoma. The epistoma is well developed in
larvae with powerful mandibles.
The closing apparatus of the spiracle adjoins the atrium in most
endoparasites, whereas in ectoparasites it may adjoin the atrium or be
situated some distance from the atrium. There is no obvious explana-
tion for this. It is generally assumed that the spiracles are open in
endoparasites in the final instar larva, which is carnivorous, feeding on
ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 505
/——____
2 O-imm
Figure 64.—Cryptinae:Hemitelini, head sclerites: 4tractodes sp. (1, antenna; 2, spiracle;
3, skin.)
the tissues of the host and liberating air from the tracheae. If the
spiracle is open there is possibly some biological advantage in having
the closing apparatus situated close to the atrium. If one function of
the closing apparatus is to prevent the entry of body fluids of the host
into the tracheal system, then it is best situated to perform this func-
tion when it adjoins the atrium. If, however, such a precaution were
necessary, one would more readily expect to find hydrofuge structures
at the opening of the tracheal system, as in many aquatic insects.
The setae of the skin of endoparasites are reduced.
It should be noted that the Cryptinae, which contain both ecto-
parasites and endoparasites of prepupae and pupae, show larval
characters which are relatively uniform within the group.
Just as some similar adults have different larvae, so do some different
adults, such as the Metopiinae and Anomalinae, have similar larvae.
These similarities may be correlated with larval habits. The Meto-
piinae, Anomalinae,®” Ichneumoninae, and Pimplini all have large,
30 Except Anomalon.
506 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
toothless mandibles with a corresponding development of the epistoma
and pleurostoma. In the Metopiinae, Anomalinae, and Ichneumoninae
the hypostoma is also well developed. In the Pimplini the hypostoma
is reduced, but the hypostomal spur is well developed. The hypostomal
spur is absent in the Metopiinae, Anomalinae, and Ichneumoninae.
The labial and stipital sclerites are, except in the Pimplini, relatively
poorly developed. The reduction of these sclerites might be corre-
lated with the relatively slight cocoons spun by these endoparasites
(see section on Anomalinae).
In the species examined of the Metopiinae, Anomalinae,”! Ichneu-
moninae, and Pimplini, development takes place in, or is completed in,
the pupa of a lepidopterous host. The Campoplegini, which are endo-
parasites of larvae, have a different type of head structure with the
epistoma absent and the labial and stipital sclerite relatively well
developed. With regard to the degree of development of these sclerites
it is significant that many Campoplegini emerge from the host larva to
spin a well developed cocoon, although some species of Hyposoter and
Benjaminia pupate within the host larva.
It cannot be claimed that all Ichneumonidae which emerge from the
pupa of the host, or even from the pupa of a lepidopterous host, will
have a larval head of similar form. The Cryptinae have a head struc-
ture which is very different from that of the Metopiinae, Anomalinae,
Ichneumoninae, and Pimplini. Also, larval habits are not constant.
Mr. J. F. Perkins (in litt.) has directed my attention to some reared
specimens of 7richomma occisor Habermehl with a quite well developed
cocoon and to an Ophion in which the cocoon is spun within the host
pupa, which remains adhering to the outside of the cocoon. Thorpe
(1930) has observed that the ectoparasite E’phialtes ruficollis (Graven-
horst) spins a light and irregular cocoon, yet when reared in a gelatin
capsule usually does not spin a cocoon. But it does appear that in most
Metopiinae, Anomalinae, Ichneumoninae, and Pimplini there is some
connection between the form of the larval head and the habits of the
larva. It is thus possible that convergence in larval characters asso-
ciated with a similarity in larval habits might explain the similarity of
the Metopiinae and Anomalinae.
From the standpoint of larval characters alone, the following inter-
relationships are suggested among the subfamilies of the Ichneu-
monidae. The Metopiinae and Anomalinae are related. The Ophi-
oninae, Mesoleiinae, and Lissonotinae are also related subfamilies.
Similarly, but to a lesser extent, there appears to be some degree of
relationship between the Tryphoninae, Cryptinae, and the tribes of
the Pimplinae other than the Pimplini and Acaenitini. The Ichneu-
moninae show some likeness to the Orthopelmatinae. The Adelogna-
thinae, Collyriinae, Plectiscinae, Diplazoninae, and Mesochorinae are
31 Except Anomalon, which pupates within the larvae of Elateridae.
ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 507
all isolated subfamilies. The Pimplini and Acaenitini are isolated
tribes showing some degree of relationship to each other and to the
remaining tribes of the Pimplinae.
There was thought to be no point in attempting to construct a family
tree.
Relationship between the [Ichneumonidae and Braconidae
The tribe Xoridini of the Pimplinae has a type of mandible which
resembles that of the subfamily Braconinae of the Braconidae. The
Braconinae possess the most generalized larval structure of the
Braconidae. Since the larval structure of the Xoridini is also gener-
alized, it is possible that this tribe connects the Ichneumonidae to the
Braconidae. There is a similarity in larval habit as well as in larval
structure since many primitive ichneumonids and braconids are
parasites of woodboring insects (see Brues, 1921).
References
Ayyar, P. N. KrisHna
1943. Biology of a new ichneumonid parasite of the Amaranthus stem
weevil of South India. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (B), vol. 17, pp.
27-36.
Baker, W. A.; Braptey, W. G.; AnD Cuark, C. A.
1949. Biological control of the European corn borer in the United States.
U.S. Dep. Agr. Techn. Bull. 983, 185 pp.
BAUMANN C. von
1933. Zur Kenntnis der Metamorphose von Ephialtes manifestator L.,
Coleocentrus excitator Poda und Echthrus reluctator L. (Hym. Ichn.).
Zool. Anz., vol. 102, pp. 143-155.
BEIRNE, B. P.
1941. A consideration of the cephalic structures and spiracles of the final
instar larvae of the Ichneumonidae (Hym.). Trans. Soc. British
Ent., vol. 7, pp. 123-190.
1942. Notes on some lepidopterous pests on fruit trees, and their parasites,
in Ireland during 1941. Econ. Proc. Roy. Dublin Soc., vol. 3,
pp. 107-118.
1942a. The biology and control of the Larch-Shoot Moth, Argyresthia
laevigatella H.-S. Econ. Proc. Roy. Dublin Soce., vol. 3, pp. 130-
149.
1943. The biology and control of the small ermine moths (Hyponomeutec spp.)
in Ireland. Econ. Proc. Roy. Dublin Soc., vol. 3, pp. 191-220.
Buunk, H.
1952. Zur Kenntnis der Hyperparasiten von Pieris brassicae L. Pt. 5:
Hemiteles simillimus sulcatus. Die Metamorphose. Zeitschr. Ang.
Ent., vol. 33, pp. 421-459.
Brapiey, W. G., ano Burasss, E. D.
1934. The biology of Cremastus flavo-orbitalis (Cameron), an ichneumonid
parasite of the European corn borer. U.S. Dep. Agr. Techn. Bull.
441, 16 pp.
008 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Brown, N. R.
1947. Studies on the parasites of the spruce budworm, Archips fumiferana
(Clem.). 2. Life history of Glypta fumiferanae (Viereck) (Hy-
menoptera, Ichneumonidae). Canadian Ent., vol. 78, pp. 188-147.
Brugs, C. T.
1921. Correlation of taxonomic affinities with food habits in Hymenoptera,
with special reference to parasitism. Amer. Nat., vol. 55, pp.
134-164.
CAMERON, E.
1938. Astudy of the natural control of the pea moth, Cydia nigricana Steph.
Bull. Ent. Res., vol. 29, pp. 277-313.
1950. The biology and economie importance of Alomya debellator (F.), a
remarkable parasite of the swift moth, Hepialis lupulinus (L.).
Bull. Ent. Res., vol. 41, pp. 429-438.
1951. On the identity of an ichneumonid parasite of Hepialis lupulinus (L.).
Bull. Ent. Res., vol. 41, p. 687.
CurystaL, R. N., AND SKINNER, E. R.
1931. Studies on the biology of Xylonomus brachylabris Kr. and X. irrigator
¥., parasites of the larch longhorn beetle, Tetrepium gabriele Wiese.
Forestry, vol. 5, pp. 21-33.
Cuancy, D. W.
1946. The insect parasites of the Chrysopidae (Neuroptera). Univ. Cali-
fornia Publ. Ent., vol. 7, pp. 403-496.
CusHMAN, R. A.
1916. Thersilochus conotracheli, a parasite of the plum curculio. Journ.
Agr. Res., vol. 6, pp. 847-855.
1947. A generic revision of the ichneumon-flies of the tribe Ophionini.
Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., vol. 96, pp. 417-482.
Cusuman, R. A., AND Rouwer, §. A.
1921. Holarctic tribes of the subfamily Ichneumoninae (Pimplinae). Proc.
U.S. Nat. Mus., vol. 59, pp. 379-396.
Daviautt, L.
1930. Notes biologiques sur Nemeritis canescens Gray. et sur la morphologie
de ses divers stades. Rev. Path. Veg., vol. 17, pp. 82-93.
Downpen, P. B.
1941. Parasites of the birch leaf-mining sawfly (Phyllotoma nemorata).
U.S. Dep. Agr., Techn. Bull. 757, 56 pp.
Given, B. B.
1944. The anatomy of the final larval instar of Diadromus (Thyraella)
collaris Grav. (Ichneumonidae), with notes on structural changes
during the prepupal and pupal stages. Trans. Roy. Soc. New
Zealand, vol. 74, pp. 297-301.
GorpaNicu, A.
1931. Gli insetti predatore e parassiti della Pyrausta nubilal’s Hubn. Boll.
Lab. Ent. Bologna, vol. 4, pp. 77-215.
Griot, M., anp Icart, A.
1948. Observaciones sobre Balcarcia bergi Brethes parasito del “bicho de
cesto.” Rev. Inv. Agr. Buenos Aires, vol. 2, pp. 197-204.
Imms, A. D. :
1918. Observations on Pimpla pomorum Ratz., a parasite of the apple
blossom weevil. Ann. Appl. Biol., vol. 4, pp. 211-217.
ICHNEUMONID FINAL INSTAR LARVAE—SHORT 509
Irawa, K.
1950. Biology of ichneumon parasites of bag-worms in Japan, I. Trans.
Kansai Ent. Soc., vol. 15, pp. 35-47.
Kost, G. 8., anp Hincxs, W. D.
1945. A check list of British insects. 483 pp.
MAnNeEVAL, H.
1936. Nouvelles notes sur divers hyménoptéres et leurs larves. Rev.
Frangaise Ent., vol. 3, pp. 18-32.
Meyer, H.
1922. On the morphology of the larvae of some parasites of the family
Ichneumonidae. Rep. Bur. Appl. Ent. Leningrad, vol. 2, pp. 25-39.
Morris, K. R. S.
1937. The prepupal stage in Ichneumonidae, illustrated by the life-history
of Exenterus abruptorius, Thb. Bull. Ent. Res., vol. 28, pp. 525-534.
Morris, K. R. 8.; Cameron, E.; anp Jepson, W. F.
1937. The insect parasites of the spruce sawfly (Diprion polytomum Htg.)
in Europe. Bull. Ent. Res., vol. 28, pp. 341-393.
Movutta, L. A., anp Courrots, C. M.
1952. Parasites of the moth-borers of sugar-cane in Mauritius. Bull. Ent.
Res., vol. 43, pp. 325-359.
NIELSEN, E.
1923. Contributions to the life-history of the pimpline parasites (Poly-
sphincta, Zaglyptus, Tromatobia). Ent. Medd., vol. 14, pp. 137-
205.
1935. :
'
‘
mat ( 7 f i ot
; 1 4 o 7 é !
f
° ,
, g' ia) iv
7 ny Ss oy
4 Sab th 4,
yey Ae Ff ; et on g9 ‘ z rc a oe y ty i
ee MS eRe Biage es) TT, Fee a
a BA Ts, badd O51 a or eee es a".
: ma ee pho BoP yd eer on ee ii
\ Ai Co Ae Wi eT, Sein 38 Att Pee
» : a) , ? ‘ 7 ar yy ma) igal, bay's ae sl iy ie » 4
; llhvow mm) ~~ P 1 Ls eee wee i
jale pen acer : ’ eS,
7 oi ~*~ q ye? ie oD a
7 . & “iy : . W :
: ; si
nie Ae
,
se 7
~. 54
PROCEEDINGS OF THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM
issued 4 Weer
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
U.S. NATIONAL MUSEUM
Vol. 110 Washington : 1960 No. 3420
MAMMALS OF NORTHERN COLOMBIA, PRELIMINARY
REPORT NO. 8: ARBOREAL RICE RATS, A SYSTEMATIC
REVISION OF THE SUBGENUS OECOMYS, GENUS
ORYZOMYS !
By Puitie HERsHKOVITZ?
Arboreal rice rats are small to medium-sized cricetines of the
genus Oryzomys (family Muridae). They are found only in tropical
and subtropical zone forests of Central and South America. Of the
two recognized species, the larger, Oryzomys (Oecomys) concolor, occurs
in northern Colombia.
The author collected 27 specimens from six localities during his
1941-43 tenure of the Walter Rathbone Bacon Traveling Scholarship
and 38 specimens, including six of the smaller species, Oryzomys
(Oecomys) bicolor, in other parts of Colombia while conducting the
Chicago Natural History Museum-Colombian Zoological Expedi-
tion (1949-52). This material and pertinent field observations are
the basis of the present report.
; j Previous reports in this series have been published in the Proceedings of the U.8. National Museum as
‘ollows:
1. Squirrels, vol. 97, August 25, 1947.
Spiny rats, vol. 97, January 6, 1948.
. Water rats, vol. 98, June 30, 1948.
. Monkeys, vol. 98, May 10, 1949.
. Bats, vol. 99, May 1949.
: Rabbits, vol. 100, Suiy 26, 1950.
. Tapirs, vol. 103, May 18, 1954.
Garator of Mammals, Chicago Natural History Museum.
Nop et
513
504676—59—1
514 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
MatTERIAL
A total of 390 specimens was studied. This number includes vir-
tually all arboreal rice rats preserved in American museums, and the
types only in the British Museum (Natural History).
The following abbreviations for museums are used in the lists of
specimens examined.
AMNH= American Museum of Natural History
BM = British Museum (Natural History)
CM = Carnegie Museum
CNHM=Chicago Natural History Museum
MACN = Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales
MCZ =Museum of Comparative Zoology
UMMZ= University of Michigan Museum of Zoology
USNM =United States National Museum
The writer expresses thanks to the authorities of the above insti-
tutions for permitting him to study the material in their charge.
THE ORYZOMYINE RODENTS
The general characters of subgenus Oecomys are common to Oryzomys
and a number of other genera which together compose the oryzomyine
group of the subfamily Cricetinae (family Muridae). In addition
to the aforementioned, the group includes the currently recognized
genera or subgenera Melanomys Thomas, Oligoryzomys Bangs,
Microryzomys Thomas, Nesoryzomys Heller, Neacomys Thomas,
Scolomys Anthony, Nectomys Peters, Sigmodontomys J. A. Allen,
and Megalomys Trouessart. The group has been defined elsewhere
(Hershkovitz, 1944, Univ. Michigan Mus. Zool. Misc. Publ. No.
58, pp. 12-17). Its more salient characters may be summarized
as follows.
Size and form Mus-like to Rattus-like; eyes and ears normal; hind
feet of the generalized scansorial-terrestrial type, or moderately
specialized for running, swimming or climbing; three middle digits
of hind foot partly, but not always conspicuously, webbed; claws
short, more or less recurved, never specialized for digging; tail always
more than one-half as long as head and body combined, generally
thinly haired, the scales always visible; mammae eight (two pairs
pectoral, two pairs inguinal). Distance between first molars always
more than length of M’; median longitudinal palatal ridge not present;
bony palate produced posteriorly beyond plane of last molars; postero-
lateral palatal fossa present and marked by a distinct pit or reticula-
tion of pits; parapterygoid fossa shallow, its anterior corner never
undercut. Incisors ungrooved, generally opisthodont, never proodont;
molars generally brachyodont, never distinctly hypsodont; crowns
crested or terraced, never plane (cf., Hershkovitz, 1955, Fieldiana,
Zool., vol. 37, p. 649); mesoloph (id) present in all molars and fused
ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 515
with mesostyle (id) as a functional unit; procingulum of upper molars
and postcingulum of lower molars present and usually well developed.
Remarks: With few exceptions, all real species of oryzomyine
rodents are well defined. Unfortunately, the multiplication of names
has made the identification of any one of them an extremely arduous,
sometimes nearly impossible, task. A total of 54 names, mostly of
specific grade, have been given to representatives of Oecomys alone.
These are shown to be applicable to only two species with a com-
bined total of nine subspecies.
Subgenus Oryzomys (Oecomys) Thomas
Gcomys, Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 18, p. 444, 1906 (subgenus of
Oryzomys Baird); ser. 8, vol. 3, pp. 378-379, 1909 (genus).
Oecomys, Gyldenstolpe, Kung]. Svenska Vet.-Akad. Handl., ser. 3, vol. 11, p. 38,
1932 (characters; list of species)—Tate, Amer. Mus. Nov., No. 581,
p. 10, 1932 (taxonomic history).—Ellerman, The families and genera of living
rodents, vol. 2, pp. 340, 342, 357, 408, 1941 (subgenus of Oryzomys).
Oryzomys, Goldman, North American Fauna, No. 43, pp. 15, 82, 1918 (part,
Oryzomys tectus group).
Typr species: Rhipidomys benevolens Thomas [=Oryzomys
(Oecomys) bicolor phaeotis Thomas], by original designation.
INCLUDED SPECIES: Oryzomys concolor Wagner, O. bicolor Tomes.
Disrrinution (figs. 1, 2): Forested parts of the tropical and
subtropical zones of Central and South America, from Costa Rica
through Panama into Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, Venezuela,
Trinidad, the Guianas and Brazil; altitudinal range from near sea
level to approximately 2,000 meters above.
The ranges of the two species are coextensive in Panama, the Rio
Orinoco basin of Colombia and Venezuela, and the Amazonian region.
So far as known, only the larger species, Oryzomys concolor, occurs in
Costa Rica, northern Colombia, northwestern Venezuela, and Trini-
dad. The smaller OQ. bicolor occurs alone in western Ecuador.
Taxonomic History
The first name proposed for an arboreal rice rat is Mus cinnamo-
meus Pictet and Pictet, 1844. It is based on an eastern Brazilian
representative of the larger species of subgenus Oecomys. Unfortu-
nately, it is invalid because the name Mus cinnamomeus had already
been used by Lichtenstein in 1830 for a species of spiny rats of the
modern genus Proechimys. The next name for an Oecomys is Hesper-
omys concolor Wagner, 1845. It was given to the large form discovered
by Johann Natterer in the forests of the upper Rio Negro, northwestern
Brazil. While the name concolor was virtually ignored by recent
authors, the animal it represents has since been redescribed under
27 different names.
VOL. 110
OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM
PROCEEDINGS
516
SuIqda][O9 [ENpPLAIpul JO uoNeI0] JOT
syoanyd
Si/Of UID!IDIO See ee ta
Seeetnee a
SN{OaGOH
JOJOIIG
~*(79¢ *d) 1290119ze3 pur 1x02 vas suoness
"eOLIIWY YINOG pur [eIUID Ul 407091g skuozk4G JO satoadsqns ay} Jo UOTINGIIIsIGq— | AANOIY
517
ARBOREAL RICE RATS—-HERSHKOVITZ
SISUBIYOG
YAOGOA
SUOIGQNS
SNSOIDAAS
AOJOIUOI
518 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
The first binomial for the smaller species of subgenus Oecomys is
Hesperomys bicolor 'Tomes, given in 1860 to a specimen from eastern
Ecuador. As in the case of O. concolor, the true nature of bicolor
was not immediately appreciated by subsequent workers. The
next member of the species, collected in western Ecuador, was de-
scribed by Thomas in 1900 as Rhipidomys dryas. This was followed
by Rhipidomys pheotis, R. benevolens, R. rosilla and R. paricola, all
described by Thomas on the basis of comparisons with his R. dryas.
In 1906, Thomas discovered the essential oryzomyine characters of
the small arboreal rice rats assigned by him to Rhipidomys. The
close relationship between them and Hesperomys bicolor Tomes was
also noted. Accordingly, Thomas combined them in Oecomys, a new
subgenus of Oryzomys. Thomas also included in subgenus Oecomys
his previously described marmosurus, mamorae, and roberti, each
based on a local form of the large species of arboreal rice rats. All
other named forms of arboreal rice rats, including Hesperomys concolor
Wagner, were ignored or tacitly regarded as species of true Oryzomys.
The name Oecomys was elevated to full generic rank by Thomas in
1909. This classification was followed by authors until Ellerman
(The families and genera of rodents, vol. 2, p. 342, 1941) questioned
the validity of Oecomys even as asubgenus. It appears that Ellerman
was misled by the current uncritical listing of some named forms of
Oryzomys concolor as species of typical Oryzomys, and other named
forms of O. concolor as species of Cecomys. Thus, his specimens of
“Oryzomys”’ tectus and ‘‘Oecomys”’ osgoodi, exhibited as proof of the
absence of important differences between the two “genera” concerned,
are actually conspecific and identical with Oryzomys concolor. The
issue is further confused by Ellerman’s observation that ‘“Oecomys”’
catherinae Thomas shares critical cranial characters with Oryzomys
subflavus Wagner. The type of Oryzomys catherinae, however, is not
an Oecomys (see p. 543) but merely another specimen of Oryzomys
subflavus Wagner. The proper basis for evaluating the taxonomic
status of Oecomys is a comparison of its type species, O. bicolor
Tomes, with O. palustris Harlan, the type species of Oryzomys.
Neither of these species was taken into account by Ellerman.
ReEecoGNIZED ForMS OF THE SUBGENUS
Oryzomys bicolor trabeatus G. M. Allen and Barbour (p. 533).
Oryzomys bicolor occidentalis, new name for Rhipidomys dryas Thomas
(=Oryzomys dryas Thomas), preoccupied (p. 533).
Oryzomys bicolor bicolor Tomes (p. 534).
Oryzomys bicolor phaeotis Thomas (p. 540).
Oryzomys concolor concolor Wagner (p. 545).
Oryzomys concolor speciosus J. A. Allen and Chapman (p. 553).
ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 519
Oryzomys concolor superans Thomas (p. 556).
Oryzomys concolor roberti Thomas (p. 559).
Oryzomys concolor bahiensis, new subspecies (replaces Mus cinnamomeus
Pictet and Pictet, preoccupied) (p. 561).
Status or Certain Species INcorREcTLY ASSIGNED TO Oecomys
Ocecomys catherinae Thomas, 1909=Oryzomys subflavus Wagner, 1842.
(See infra p. 543.)
Oecomys rez Thomas, 1910=Oryzomys subflavus Wagner, 1842. (See
infra p. 543.)
Ocecomys emiliae J. A. Allen, 1916=Rhipidomys emiliae J. A. Allen.
Ocecomys phelpsi Tate, 1939=Akodon aerosus Thomas, 1913. The
name phelpsi is based on a skin of what may be either an Oecomys
or a Lhipidomys (cf. Tate, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 76,
p- 194, 1939) and a mismatched skull of Akodon (Chalcomys)
aerosus. ‘The name phelpsi was restricted to the skull by Tate
(Journ. Mammal., vol. 26, p. 316, 1945). Oecomys phelpsi Tate,
therefore, is a synonym of Akodon aerosus. Goodwin (Bull.
Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 102, p. 300, 1953) lists the skin as
type. Tate’s decision, however, has priority and is irrevocable.
Mus pyrrhorhinos Wied Neuwied, 1821=Wiedomys pyrrhorhinos
Wied Neuwied. This small arboreal mouse from eastern Brazil
was provisionally referred to Oecomys by Osgood (Journ. Mam-
mal., vol. 14, p. 370, 1933) and is so classified by Goodwin (Bull.
Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 102, p. 300, 1953). Ellerman (Fami-
lies and genera of living rodents, vol. 2, p. 349, 1941) lists it as
the sole member of a species group of Oryzomys. It has since
been shown (Hershkovitz, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, vol. 72,
p. 5, 1959) that the mouse is type of a distinct genus most nearly
related to phyllotine rodents.
Mus maculipes Pictet and Pictet, 1844=Rhipidomys maculipes Pictet
and Pictet. Incorrectly listed as an Oecomys by Tate, Amer.
Mus. Nov., No. 581, pp. 10, 21 [footnote 1], 1932.
Hesperomys simpler Winge, 1888=? Winge (EK Museo Lundii, vol. 1,
No. 3, p. 11, pl. 2, fig. 1, 1888) based the name on the anterior
portion of a skull found in owl pellets in Recent-Pleistocene de-
posits in the caves of Lagéa Santa, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Moojen
(Os roedores do Brasil, p. 55, 1952) treats this species as an
Oecomys. However, it is obvious from the original description
and figured skull, and from Winge’s own definition of Hesperomys,
that simpler is neither an Oecomys nor an oryzomyine. The
broad forward-projecting zygomatic plate of simplex, its narrow,
unridged, and rather concave-sided interorbital region, long
palate, and simplified molars, i.e. without mesoloph, point to
520 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
phyllotine or sigmodont affinities. A more precise determination
of the systematic position of Hesperomys simplex cannot be made
on the basis of available data.
CHARACTERS
EXTERNAL CHARACTERS: Body heavy, limbs short and adapted for
arboreal life; size from approximately that of a house mouse (Mus
musculus) to that of a medium-sized house rat (Rattus rattus); pelage
long and thick; dorsal surface from buffy to tawny or rufous, with a
fine to coarse mixture of dark brown; a poorly defined dark middorsal
band sometimes present; underparts from sharply defined white to
dark gray, buff, or ochraceous little or not at all defined from
sides; an ochraceous lateral line present or absent; ears comparatively
small, length (from notch) approximately one-half to four-fifths length
of hind foot (dry, with claw); tail never sharply bicolor, sparsely
haired except at thickly furred base, tip with or without a conspicuous
tuft; length of tail from 40 to 60 percent of total length; hind foot
comparatively short and broad, sole at heel bare but half hidden by
overlapping hairs of side of tarsus; six plantar tubercles present and
well developed; first hind toe with claw extending to base of middle
phalanx of second toe, fifth hind toe well developed for grasping, its
claw nearly or quite on a level with base of terminal phalanx of fourth
toe; claws short and recurved, the fifth exposed, the others partially
concealed by the digital tufts.
CRANIAL CHARACTERS (pls. 1-3): Skull moderately heavy; sides of
supraorbital region ridged or beaded and markedly divergent pos-
teriorward; midtransverse width of paired frontals more than greatest
width of rostrum; nasals comparatively short; upper anterior corner
of vertical zygomatic plate rounded and slightly or not at all visible
when skull is viewed from above; zygomatic plate comparatively
slender, its anteroposterior width at midpoint not more than alveolar
length of M’!~; interparietal well developed, its median length vary-
ing from approximately three-tenths to slightly more than one-half
its transverse width; sphenopalatine vacuities small, slit-like, or ob-
solete; incisive foramina moderately long and well opened, length
more than one-half but less than nine-tenths that of diastema, the
posterior borders terminating from slightly before to slightly behind
anterior plane of first molars; auditory bullae small, their antero-
posterior length, exclusive of tube, less than that of molar row.
DENTAL CHARACTERS (fig. 3; pl. 4a,b): Upper incisors recurved;
upper molar rows parallel-sided; inner and outer halves of unworn to
moderately worn upper molar crowns distinctly crested, of lower
molars bilevel, i.e., with outer cusps lower than inner cusps; major
fold well open, a low enterostyle present at its base in M!*, and fre-
ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 521
quently in M®; first minor fold reduced or obsolete in unworn M?,
obsolete or absent in M?’; anterior border of procingulum of unworn
first upper molar sometimes notched; mesostyle always fused with
mesoloph and connected with either paracone or metacone, or both;
a well-developed paralophule usually present and often extending
across first secondary fold to connect with mesoloph; primary folds
often irregular in outline, the second primary usually isolated from
the margin; first and second internal folds of M'!* discrete or confluent
with corresponding primary folds, of M® discrete or confluent with
primary or secondary folds; first secondary fold present in all upper
molars, usually as an enamel island or as two, sometimes three, is-
lands separated by the paralophule; second secondary fold present in
M!~ as an enamel island, in M* as a discrete island, or may be coalesced
with either second primary or second internal fold, or absent. Pro-
cingulum of M, subovate in outline, never distinctly bilobate, the
internal, labial and lingual folds isolated from the margin, discrete
or coalesced with each other; apex of major fold of M,+ hardly or not
at all extending beyond midline of tooth; first minor fold well de-
veloped in all lower molars; ectostylid well developed in all molars;
ectolophid always present, frequently well developed and fused with
ectostylid; a well-defined fold between hypoconid and ectolophid
often present and isolated from the margin; first and second internal
folds coalesced with corresponding primary folds; first secondary fold
of M..; obsolete or absent; second secondary fold of M,., well developed,
usually isolated but clearly defining mesolophid, of M3; obsolete or
absent; a small entolophulid sometimes present in one or more molars.
CoMPARISONS
Subgenus Oecomys is the oryzomyine most specialized for arboreal
life. Its adaptive characters contrast sharply with those of true
Oryzomys as represented by its typical species, the palustrine, riparian
O. palustris Harlan. In palustris, pelage of upperparts is dark and
glossy, middle digits of hind feet (fig. 4f) long, the outer ones short;
interdigital webbing nearly as well developed as in the aquatic
oryzomyine Nectomys; fifth postdigital plantar tubercle reduced or
lost as in many aquatic Muridae; tail coarsely scutulated and often
provided with keel hairs. The skull of O. palustris (pls. 1-4) differs
from subgenus Qecomys chiefly by the prominence of the forward-
projecting zygomatic plate when viewed from above and by the ex-
tremely large sphenopalatine vacuities. The molars of palustris and
subgenus Oceomys (pl. 4) are similar but the lower internal folds are
usually discrete in those of palustris. Except for the presence of
intermediate forms, typical Oryzomys and subgenus Oceomys might
well be treated as generically. distinct.
022 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Some species of the arboreal genus Rhipidomys resemble subgenus
Oecomys in superficial characters. Both groups have evolved as
arboreal forms along parallel lines but Rhipidomys is more special-
ized. Its tail (fig. 56) is more hairy and, in certain species, considerably
longer; the fifth hind toe is longer and a brown metatarsal patch is
generally present. The very closely related Nyctomys (fig. 5a) is
another arboreal cricetine that resembles subgenus Oecomys in external
characters. Rhipidomys and Nyctomys are members of the pero-
myscine group of cricetines which differs from oryzomyines chiefly by
its short palate (pl. 2d) without pitted posterolateral palatal depres-
sions, some minor dental characters (pl. 4), and by the mammary
formula, 1—2=6.
Additional comparisons of subgenus Oecomys are given under the
individual species headings.
Some ARBOREAL ADAPTATIONS
Hinp Foot (fig. 4): The pes of subgenus Oecomys is actually and
relatively shorter and broader than that of closely related terrestrial
species of comparable body size. Measurements of the length of the
hind foot of a series of the small species Oryzomys (Oecomys) bicolor
are shown in table 1. They may be compared with measurements in
EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS IN FicurRE 3
Names of Cusps
Upper Molars
1, Protocone
2, Hypocone
3, Paracone
4, Metacone
5, Mesoloph
6, Mesosty]
7-12, Procingulum
7, Anteroloph
8, Anterolabial style
9, Anteroconule
10, Anterolingua] style
11, Anterolabial
conule
12, Anterolingual
conule
13, Posteroloph (post-
cingulum)
14, Enterostyle
15, Paralophule
Lower Molars
1, Protoconid
2, Hypoconid
3, Metaconid
4, Entoconid
5, Mesolophid
6, Mesostylid
7-12, Procingulum
7, Anterolophid
8, Anterolingual stylid
(not shown)
9, Anteroconulid
10, Anterolabial stylid
11, Anterolingual
conulid
12, Anterolabial
conulid
13, Posterolophid (post-
cingulum)
14, Ectostylid
15, Ectolophid
16, Entolophulid
Names of Folds
mf, major fold
nf 1, first minor fold
pf 1, first primary fold
pf 2, second primary fold
sf 1, first secondary fold
sf 2, second secondary
fold
if 1, first internal fold
(shown coalesced
with pf 1)
if 2, second internal fold
(shown coalesced
with pf 2)
aif, anterior internal fold
asf, anterior secondary
fold (upper first
molar only)
alf, anterior lingual fold
(upper first molar
only)
abf, anterior labial fold
(lower first molar
only)
apf, anterior primary
fold (lower first
molar only)
ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 523
abf
FIRST UPPER MOLAR
BUCCAL VIEW
Ficure 3.—Molars of Oecomys: a diagrammatic composite of the enamel pattern. The
basic elements and some of the variations present in the upper and lower molars of Ory-
zomys (Oecomys) bicolor and O. (O.) concolor are shown. Explanation of symbols on
opposite page.
524 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
JN
iN
O bicolor’ ©O concolor O. laticeps
O. meridensis O. palustris
Ficure 4.—Right hind foot of: a, arboreal Oryzomys bicolor; b, arboreal O. concolor; c,
semi-arboreal O. subflaous; d, terrestrial O. laticeps; ¢, terrestrial O. meridensis; f, palus-
trine O. palustris. g, Plantar surface of murid hind foot showing position of pads (1-5=
postdigital plantar pads; mtp=metatarsal pad).
ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 525
table 2 of a series of the equally small but terrestrial species Oryzomys
alfaroit. Measurements in tables 3 and 4 are, respectively, of a series
of the large arboreal Oryzomys (Oecomys) concolor from eastern
Colombia, and those of a series of the comparably sized terrestrial
Oryzomys (Oryzomys) laticeps from the same region. Because of
distortions of the hind{foot in dry specimens, no reliable measurement
can be given for the width of the metatarsus relative to foot length.
The hind foot of Gecomys appears short in comparison with terres-
trial types. Nevertheless, the proportions between metatarsalia and
digits have probably diverged little from those of the scansorial type
of primitive cricetines. On the other hand, the greater breadth of
the metatarsus of subgenus Oecomys (fig. 4a,b) does appear to be
a specialization for arboreal life. The broader foot provides a more
powerful and expansive grasp for climbing, perching, and hanging.
It also permits an effective degree of opposability between the first
and fifth metatarsals and a considerable amount of adduction and
abduction in the corresponding toes.
PLANTAR TUBERCLES: Six plantar tubercles, the primitive number,
are present and well developed in subgenus Oecomys (fig. 4a,b). The
first four postdigital pads are large and with little space between them.
The smaller fifth postdigital pad is also well developed, and is sepa-
rated from the fourth by a space less than its smallest diameter. The
metatarsal pad is long and narrow, as usual in cricetines. The function
of the postdigital plantar tubercles has not been observed in subgenus
Oecomys. Homer (Contr. Lab. Vert. Gen. Univ. Michigan, No. 61, p.
13, 1954) states that in scansorial forms of Peromyscus the pads are
used for grasping. ‘The method was not described but undoubtedly
slender branches and twigs may be clutched between apposing
tubercles.
Criaws: The claws are thick, comparatively short, recurved, their
tips sharp and raised well above the ends of the toes. These claws
cannot serve for digging and their position does not interfere with the
action of the toes as grasping organs. In contrast, claws of closely
related terrestrial cricetines such as Oryzomys laticeps are slender,
little curved, and shield the fleshy tips of the toes when used in
scratching or digging.
Tait: Modification of this organ as a specialized tool for arboreal
life is not pronounced in subgenus Qecomys. It is not remarkably
long and in many individuals is actually shorter than head and body
combined. The average length, however, is greater than that of head
and body combined. The tail of subgenus Oecomys appears to be
slightly thicker than those of comparable sylvan cricetines of pre-
dominately terrestrial habits. This character indicates greater
power for balancing, prehension and support in climbing. The
526 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
C d
Ficure 5.—Comparative length of hair of terminal portion of tail of: a, arboreal peromy-
scine, Nyctomys; b, arboreal peromyscine, Rhipidomys; c, arboreal oryzomyine, Oryzomys
bicolor; d, terrestrial oryzomyine, Oryzomys laticeps.
pilosity of the tail (figs. 5, 6) varies considerably but is never as great
as in such related arboreal cricetines as Rhipidomys and Nyctomys.
The thin pencil and elongated hairs of the terminal one-fourth or
one-third of the tail are probably sensory and used by the mouse for
detecting movements in the rear.
Discussion: Hind foot length of arboreal mice of the subgenus
Oecomys averages less than 21.5 percent of combined head and body
length. The hind foot of predominantly terrestrial oryzomyines aver-
ages more than 21 percent. The arboreal or terrestrial pes could, there-
fore, have evolved from an ancestral type with average length from 21
to 21.5 percent of combined head and body length. Specialization of
the hind foot of the evolving arboreal cricetine is expressed first by a
lateral broadening of the metatarsus. As the animal becomes increas-
ingly dependent on its arboreal habitat, the metatarsus becomes
more flexible, the first and fifth digits more powerful and opposable,
and the plantar tubercles modified for grasping. In contrast, the hind
foot of the highly specialized cursorial or saltatorial terrestrial crice-
tine becomes narrower and longer relative to head and body length,
the metatarsus rigid, and the first and fifth hind digits reduced.
A tail length approximately equal to head and body combined
appears to be the generalized condition in cricetines. In the evolu-
tion of ambulatory, terrestrial species, notably volelike and fossorial
forms, the tail becomes shorter. In arboreal, saltatorial and some
ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 527
Ficure 6.—Hair-scale relationships on basal portion of tail in Oryzomys. Hairs of one
scale only are shown; the same number and disposition of hairs occurs on every scale.
(X 40.)
aquatic cricetines, the tail has become longer, at least on an average.
The degree of specialization of hind foot and tail of cricetines may
be measured by the amount each organ has diverged from the critical
proportions given above. Thus, in oryzomyines the longer the hind
foot than 21.5 percent of combined head and body length, or shorter
than 21 percent, the more specialized it is. In other cricetines, the
critical proportions may be a little more or less. Likewise, the longer
or shorter a tail than combined head and body length, the greater
the specialization. This, in effect, implies that a specialized short-
footed species could not have evolved from a specialized long-footed
form, or vice versa; and that a specialized long-tailed species cannot
claim a specialized short-tailed species as its ancestor, or vice versa.
On the basis of the above criteria, Oryzomys (Oecomys) concolor
is more highly specialized for arboreal life than O. (Oecomys) bicolor.
Its hind foot is comparatively shorter, its tail proportionately longer.
The more developed temporal ridges also indicate greater special-
ization of the masseter muscle.
HapBits AND Hapsrirats
The two known species of subgenus Oecomys nest in tree hollows,
tangled masses of epiphytes or vines, palm fronds, abandoned bird
nests and in thatched roofs of houses. They normally feed above
ground, but famine or drought may drive them to the ground in search
528 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
of food and water. At least the larger species, Oryzomys concolor,
never lives far from water. I have often shined individuals at night
running along the maze of tree trunks, vines, logs and even fences
that connect their arboreal nests with the water’s edge. The smaller
species is the one most commonly found in houses where arboreal
habitats are simulated by the palm-thatched roofs and natural timber
frameworks. A lone mouse or one or two families of either species
may be permanent residents in the thatched roof or attic of a house.
On the other hand, many individuals merely visit buildings for feeding
on insects or man’s food stores. Marauding mice are obliged to cross
the cleared ground between the forest-edge and the building.
Oryzomys concolor frequently nests near the ground. It is commonly
taken in traps placed on logs, along fences and on the banks of streams
sheltered by shrubs and overhanging vines. OQ. concolor has managed
to survive in a number of localities (e.g. Villanueva, Colombia)
where the primitive forest cover has been reduced to small isolated
stands, scattered trees, shrubs and thinly wooded stream banks.
It also thrives in plantations of coffee, bananas and other fruits.
Where living conditions are optimum, Oryzomys concolor tends to form
colonies and can become excessively numerous. The collector Sala-
mon Briceiio notes (MS.) that the species does considerable damage
in coffee plantations in the district of Mérida, Venezuela.
The smaller species, Oryzomys bicolor, is strictly arboreal and prefers
to nest high above ground. Although one of the most common native
house mice in tropical South America, it is not found in areas where
forests have lost their dominance. It lives in pairs or in single family
groups and is nowhere known to be abundant.
Males of Oryzomys concolor exude a musky odor. The females of
either species of Oecomys produce two to four young in a litter. The
condition of the mammae in dry skins suggests that young are born
the year round.
The name Oecomys (oikos=house-+-mus) was given in allusion to
the mice’s predilection for houses. In eastern Ecuador where ar-
boreal rice rats are common, the local Quechua name for QO. concelor
is “polanda ucucha” (banana rat) and for OQ. bicolor, ‘jahua uchucha.”
The meaning of ‘“‘jahua”’ is obscure.
Oryzomys bicolor Tomes
Disrrisution (fig. 1): Tropical zones of Panama, Venezuela (ex-
clusive of the Maracaibo basin), Ecuador, the Guianas, the Amazonian
and upper Rio Paraguay basins of Brazil, and the Amazonian regions
of Bolivia, Peru, and Colombia; altitudinal range, from near sea level
to about 2,000 meters above. The apparent disbributional hiatus in
ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 529
northwestern Venezuela and in northern and western Colombia may
not be real.
EXTERNAL CHARACTERS: Dorsal surface ochraceous to tawny finely
mixed with dark brown; underparts sharply defined white or buffy to
ochraceous, the basal portions of the individual hairs white through-
out, or pale gray on belly and lateral borders; tail from 40-60 percent
of total length.
TaBLE 1.—Oryzomys (Oecomys) bicolor bicolor Tomes: External measurements
(in millimeters) of a series of adults from the Rio Caquetd region, eastern Colombia.
Specimens were collected and measured in the flesh by the author. Note proportional
length of hind foot and compare with table 2.
Hind foot Hind foot/ Weight
CNHM No. Tail (dry, c. u.) ore (in grams)
Percent
20.9
21.0
20.9
21.1
22.8
18.9
CRANIAL CHARACTERS (pls. 1-11): Sides of supraorbital region
finely beaded, sometimes narrowly ledgelike; temporal ridges never
strongly developed anteriorly, weakly defined or obsolete posteriorly;
anterior zygomatic plate comparatively narrow, its anteroposterior
width at midpoint always less than alveolar length of M!-’, and fre-
quently less than length of M?~*; upper anterior corner of zygomatic
plate not produced forward and barely or not at all visible when skull
is viewed from above; braincase well inflated, usually convex antero-
posteriorly at frontoparietal suture, the interparietal steeply arched;
position of posterior borders of incisive foramina from slightly in front
of to slightly behind anterior plane of first molars; posterior halves of
palatines without notable excrescences.
DENTAL CHARACTERS. Those of the subgenus.
Comparisons: Ordinarily the difference in size between Oryzomys
bicolor and O. concolor is sufficient for distinguishing the smaller from
the larger species. However, a few extremely large individuals of
O. bicolor may equal or even exceed in size small adults of some popu-
lations of O. concolor. Where the similarity extends to color of
underparts, length of hind foot, size of molars and width of anterior
zygomatic plate, it may be difficult to distinguish an isolated specimen
of the first species from that of another of the second species.
504676—59 2
530 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
TaBLE 2.—Oryzomys (Oryzomys) alfaroi gracilis Thomas: External measurements
(in millimeters) of a series of adults from Valdivia, Antioquia, central Colombia.
Specimens were collected and measured in the flesh by the author. Note proportional
length of hind foot and compare with table 1.
Head and Hind foot Hind foot/ Weight
CNHM No. Sex body Tail (dry, c. u.) Head and (in grams)
body
Percent
70507 a 110 119 26 23.7 40
70508 fot 101 108 25 24.7 40
70511 fof 114 110 26 22.8 _
70513 ou 104 108 26 25.0 30
70515 a 107 104 25 23.3 40
70516 fol 122 122 27 pede _
70517 foul 104 112 25 24.0 _
70518 ofl 107 127 27 25. 2 40
70509 °) 101 101 24 23.7 —
70510 °) 106 101 25 23.6 _
70512 2 106 101 25 23.5 30
70514 io) 116 116 26 22.4 _—
Mean 108 112 25 23.7 37
Members ofthe Oryzomys longicaudatus group, or subgenus Olig-
oryzomys, are the only other rice rats that resemble Oryzomys bicolor.
They are smaller, primarily terrestrial”mice, with pelage compara-
tively coarse, underparts sometimes pure white, as in 0. bicolor but
more commonly with the color of the basal portions of the hairs dark
gray and usually showing through at the surface; tail more slender,
equal to or longer than combined head and body length, coarsely
scutulated, nearly naked and without a definable pencil; hind foot
narrow and comparatively longer, generally more than 23 percent of
combined head and body length; sole at heel not hidden by over-
lapping lateral tarsal hairs in the tropical zone forms; first hind toe
with claw barely extending beyond base of second toe, fifth hind toe
slender, its claw extending to base of middle phalanx of fourth toe,
sometimes slightly distad; skull (pl. 7b) more elongate, braincase
narrower, bullae more inflated; anterior zygomatic plate forward-
projecting so that one-half its width is visible from above; supraorbital
region narrow, the sides concave, parallel or slightly divergent pos-
teriorward and never ridged or beaded; median longitudinal sulcus of
nasals continuing as a well marked depression over anteromedian
portion of frontals.
CoLoR AND PELAGE: Geographic variation in color in Oryzomys
bicolor is insignificant from a taxonomic point of view. This is
remarkable in view of the extent and ecological diversity of the area
occupied by the animal. The usual correlation between coat color
and color of soil or ground cover apparent in most terrestrial cricetines
ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 531
TaBLeE 3.—Oryzomys (Oecomys) concolor superans Thomas: External measure-
ments (in millimeters) of a series of adults from the Rio Caquetd region, eastern
Colombia. Specimens were collected and measured in the flesh by the author.
Note tail length and proportional length of hind foot and compare with table 4.
Hind foot Hind foot/ Weight
CNHM No. bod (dry, c. u.) Head and (in grams)
Percent
anit
18.2
ou
ro
rol
rol
oe
fo
a
rot
fof
2
2
9
9
2
2
g
g
2
9
is not evident in arboreal Oryzomys bicolor. The direct relationship
between amount of rainfall and intensity of coat color, clearly ex-
pressed in many species of terrestrial and arboreal mammals, is but
slightly indicated on the underparts of some individuals of OQ. bicolor.
Temperature throughout the area occupied by O. bicolor is fairly
uniform and has little or no effect on the length, thickness, texture and,
indirectly, the color of the pelage.
The underparts vary from pure white to uniformly ochraceous.
White underparts may be marked by buff or ochraceous spots, patches
and streaks. In underparts that appear wholly white at the surface,
the basal portions of the hairs are generally white except, sometimes,
along the sides where they may be gray. Where the underparts are
tinged, the basal portions of the hairs are, as a rule, dark gray.
In any one population, each adult may be classified as either bright
or dark according to the color of its upperparts and sides. In the
bright color group, the terminal portions of the cover hairs are ochra-
ceous orange with or without a fine dark brown tipping. The
terminal portions of the guard hairs are dark brown. The colors in
the dark group are similar but the cover hairs are more uniformly
tipped with dark brown and there is a greater concentration of
guard hairs.
532 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
The difference between the color groups are slight and in any
large series completely intergrading. Extreme examples of the bright
color group are nearly erythristic. On the other hand, no specimen
of the dark group even remotely suggests melanism.
There are some examples in present material of adults molting
from one color group to another.
The color of nestling young is like that of adults. As the juvenal
coat of cover hairs on upperparts and sides becomes worn, the dark
eray basal portions of the hairs show through. Adult pelage begins
to replace juvenal pelage on the lower parts of the sides of the body
and on the shoulders. Adult pelage appears next on head, nape, and
shoulders, respectively. Evidently, the short, wholly slate colored
pelage characteristic of most newborn terrestrial species of Oryzomys
is either absent or ephemeral in O. bicolor.
THE SUBSPECIES
Four subspecies of Oryzomys bicolor are recognized, two of them
provisionally. The first, bicolor Tomes, occupies most of the range
of the species east of the Andes. The second, phaeotis Thomas of
southeastern Peru and northern Bolivia, averages larger in size than
the others. OQ. 6. trabeatus G. M. Allen and Barbour is the Central
American representative. It appears to be completely isolated
TasLeE 4.—Oryzomys (Oryzomys) laticeps Lund: External measurements (in
millimeters) of a series of adults from the Rio Caquetd region, eastern Colombia.
Specimens were collected and measured in the flesh by the author. Note tail length
and proportional length of hind feet and compare with table 3.
Head and Hind foot Hind foot/ Weight
bod (dry, c.u) many (in grams)
rou
rot
a
fol
fol
ou
rou
rot
rou
rol
ro
rou
9
2
2
©
ie)
2
]
ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 533
geographically from its relatives but is not known enough to be
characterized. 0. 6. occidentalis (new name) of western Ecuador is
distinguished by a few trivial cranial characters.
Oryzomys (Oecomys) bicolor trabeatus G. M. Allen and Barbour
Oecomys trabeatus G. M. Allen and Barbour, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., vol. 65,
p. 262, 1923.—G. M. Allen, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., vol. 71, p. 266, 1931
(type history).
Oecomys endersi Goldman, Journ. Washington Acad. Sci., vol. 23, p. 525, 1933
(type locality, Barro Colorado Island, Canal Zone, Panama).—Enders,
Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., vol. 78, p. 454, 1935 (Barro Colorado, Panama;
habits).
Typr: Adult male, skin and skull (MCZ 19837); collected Apr. 10>
1922, by Thomas Barbour and W. S. Brooks.
TYPE Loca.ity: Rio Jesusito, Darién region, eastern Panama.
DistrisuTion: Known only from the Canal Zone to the eastern
boundary of Panama. The range may extend into Costa Rica on the
west and into the Colombian Chocé on the south; altitudinal range
from sea level to about 500 meters above.
Cuaracters: Those of the species. See ‘‘Remarks,”’ below.
MeEasurEMENTs: Those of the type of trabeatus (from the original
description) are followed by those of the type of endersi: head and
body, 110, 114; tail, 120, 124; hind foot, 22 (in flesh), 24 (dry); ear,
15, 15; greatest length of skull, 26.0, 28.1; zygomatic breadth, 15,
15.1; rostrum, —, 5.4; incisive foramina, —, 4.8; diastema, 7.0,
7.4; molar row, 4.0, 4.3 (alveolar); width of zygomatic plate, —, 2.5.
Remarks: Judged by the original description, the type of trabeatus
is a young individual of the bright color group. It was compared
with three darkly colored individuals of Oryzomys bicolor from eastern
Ecuador and said to differ by its ‘somewhat larger’’ size, longer tail
and longer, thicker pelage. None of these distinctions is valid.
Retention here of trabeatus for Central American members of the
common species is based solely on the availability of the name and
the absence of any records of the occurrence of the species in the
deciduous forests of northern Colombia. It is also possible that
additional material from Panama may reveal subspecific differences
that cannot be accurately evaluated from one specimen.
The type of enderst Goldman, also from Panama, is an old individual
of the dark color group. Its size and color are within the range of
variation of the typical form of the species.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED: One (UMMZ, type of endersi, from
Panama).
Oryzomys (Oecomys) bicolor occidentalis, new name
Rhipidomys dryas Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 5, p. 271, 1900
(preoccupied by Oryzomys dryas Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol.
2, p. 267, 1898, a member of the subgenus Microryzomys)
534 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
[Oryzomys (Gicomys)] dryas, Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser., 7, vol. 18,
p. 455, 1906 (“probably = bicolor’’).
Type: Adult female, skin and skull (BM 99.12.5.4); collected May
11, 1899, by R. Miketta.
Type Locauity: Paramba, Rfo Mira, Imbabura, northwestern
Ecuador; altitude, 1,100 meters above sea level.
Distrisution: Known from northwestern Ecuador only. No
doubt the range extends northward into western Colombia. Its
southward extension may be limited to the Rio Guayas drainage
system in Manabi, Bolivar, and Guayas Provinces, Ecuador. Its
altitudinal range is from near sea level to about 1,500 meters above on
the western slope of the Cordillera Occidental.
CHARACTERS: Size and external characters as in ¢trabeatus and
typical bicolor: zygomata less expanded; midtransverse width of
paired frontals hardly more than greatest width of rostrum and com-
paratively less than in other races.
MeEAsuREMENTs: Those of the type of dryas Thomas (from the
original description) are followed by those of two adults from Pambilar,
Esmeraldas, Ecuador: head and body, 100, 104, 106; tail, 120, 115
(dry), 130 (dry); hind foot, 22 (s.w.), 22 (dry, c.w.), 23 (dry, c.u.);
ear, 14, 12 [?], 15; greatest length of skull, 27.0. 26.4, 27.4; zygomatic
breadth, 15.0, 13.5, 13.4; rostrum, —, 5.1, 5.3; incisive foramina,
4.6, 4.6, 4.5; diastema, 7.0, 6.5, 6.4; molar row, 3.8, 4.0 (alveolar),
4.1 (alveolar) ; width of zygomatic plate, —, 2.2, 2.5.
Remarks: The three near topotypes at hand are brightly colored.
One is a juvenal in old pelage but with an irregular patch of bright
new adult pelage on nape, back, and left side.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED: Four, from the following localities in
Ecuador: Paramba, Imbabura, 1 (BM, type of dryas); Pambilar,
Esmeraldas, 3 (USNM).
Oryzomys bicolor bicolor Tomes
Hesperomys longicaudatus, Tomes (not Bennett), Proc. Zool. Soc. London (1858),
p. 548, 1859 (Gualaquiza, Ecuador).
Hesperomys bicolor Tomes, Proc. Zool. Soc. London (1860), p. 217, 1860.
[Hesperomys] M[yoxomys] bicolor, Tomes, Proc. Zool. Soc. London (1861), p.
284, 1862.
H{esperomys (Rhipidomys)] bicolor, Thomas, Proc. Zool. Soc. London (1884),
p. 448, 1884 (doubtfully referred to Rhipidomys).
Oryzomys (CEcomys) bicolor, Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 18, p.
445, 1906 (‘‘type. .. described from a discoloured specimen with a broken
tail’).
Oryzomys (Oecomys) bicolor, Sanborn, Journ. Mammal., vol. 30, p. 285, 1949
(Yarinacocha, Loreto, Peru).
comys bicolor, J. A. Allen, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 35, p. 210, 1916
(Colombia: Andalucfa, Huila; Florencia, Caquet4).—Thomas, Ann. Mag.
ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 535
Nat. Hist., ser. 9, vol. 19, p. 370, 1927 (Yurac Yacu, San Martfn, Peru,
“mostly caught in house’’); ser. 10, vol. 2, p. 262, 1928 (San Jerénimo, Loreto,
Peru).
Oecomys bicolor, Osgood, Field Mus. Nat. Hist., zool. ser., vol. 10, p. 161, 1914
(Tambo Yacu, near Rioja, San Martin, Peru).—Gyldenstolpe, Kung].
Svenska Vet.-Akad. Handl., vol. 11, p. 39, 1932 (characters; ‘“‘type locality:
South-western Ecuado:, Guayaquil.’”—Tate, Zoologica, vol. 32, p. 66, 1947
(Rancho Grande, Aragua, Venezuela, 1,100 meters).
Rhtpidomys rosilla Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 14, p. 35, 1904
(type locality, La Unién, lower Rio Caura, Rfo Orinoco, Bolfvar, Venezuela).
[Oryzomys (Ccomys)] rosilla, Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 18, p.
445, 1906 (classification).
Rhipidomys paricola Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 14, p. 194, 1904
(type locality, Igarapé Agu, on the railway line between Belém de Pard and
Braganca, Parad, Brazil; altitude, 50 meters).
[Oryzomys (GEcomys)] paricola, Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 18,
p. 445, 1906 (classification).
Gcomys nitedulus Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 8, vol. 6, p. 505, 1910
(type locality, lower Essequibo River, 13 miles above mouth, Demerara,
British Guiana).—Anthony, Zoologica, vol. 3, No. 13, p. 275, 1921 (Kartabo,
British Guiana).
CGcomys millert J. A. Allen, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 35, p. 523, 1916
(type locality, Barfo de Malgacgo, Rio Conguiaru, upper Gy-Paran4, Rio
Madeira, Mato Grosso, Brazil).
Gcomys florenciae J. A. Allen, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 35, p. 524, 1916
(type locality, Florencia, Rfo Orteguaza, upper Rio Caquetd, Caquetd,
Colombia).
[?]@comys rutilus Anthony, Amer. Mus. Nov., No. 19, p. 4, 1921 (type locality,
Kartabo, at junction of Cuyuni and Mazaruni Rivers, lower Essequibo,
Demerara, British Guiana) Anthony, Zoologica, vol. 3, No. 138, p. 275,
1921.
Rhypidomys [sic] benevolens, Ihering (not Thomas), Rev. Mus. Paulista, Sao
Paulo, vol. 6, p. 420, 1904 (Rio Jurud, Amazonas, Brazil; skull, 28 mm.,
molar row, 4.3).
Type: Young adult female, skin and skull (BM 7.1.1.96) ; collected
by Mr. Fraser.
TYPE LocaLity: Gualaquiza, Rio Gualaquiza, Santiago-Zamora
Province, southeastern Ecuador; altitude, 885 meters above sea level.
Distrisution: From the Amazonian region of Brazil north into
the Guianas, west into the foothills of the Cordillera Oriental in
Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, and the Rios Ucayali and Huallaga
basins of Peru, south into the upper Rio Paraguay drainage basin in
Mato Grosso, Brazil; altitudinal range from sea level to possibly
1,000 meters above.
CuaractEers: Those of the species.
MEASUREMENTs: See table 5.
VARIATION: Six specimens at hand from Zamora are near topotypes.
Three are juvenals in old pelage with the new adult pelage appearing
along the sides of the body. The three adults are uniformly colored
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM
VOL. 110
TaBLe 5.—Oryzomys bicolor bicolor Tomes: Measurements (in millimeters)
Locality
COLOMBIA
Guaicaramo
Mambita
Florencia 1!
Florencia
Mecaya
Tres Troncos
Ino Gaje
EcuADOR
Rfo Suno
Llunehi
Canelos
Copataza
Zamora
Gualaquiza ?
PERU
Curaray
Rio Mazaén
Rio Santiago
Rio Ucayali 3
Satipo
VENEZUELA
Rancho Grande
La Union 4
BRITISH GUIANA
Kartabo
Kartabo 6
Essequibo?7
Holmia
BRAZIL
Jauaraté
Igarap6 Bravo
Limontuba
Reereio
Igarapé-acu 8
Baréo Melgaco ®
Bardo Melgaco
100
98, 100, 100
111, 105, 115
109, 110
96(85-113)8
110, 108, 107
103, 108, 103
108, 112
108
pa
105, 105
100
100, 100, 100
95, 120, —
119, 121
107(98-114)7
105, 117, 113
100, 121, 100
111, 111
110
108, =, —
120, 115
Hind foot
22(21.0- 22.5)5
22
22
22, 22, 22
22, 22, 23
24
14, 16, 13
14, 14
15(14-16)8
’ ,
153515
by italic
Skull, greatest
length
28.2(25.7-29.1)5
26.5, 27.4, 28.8
26.5, 26.8, 28.1
26.9, 27.6, 27.9
26.6, 27.0, 27.5
27.6, 28.5
27.5
26.5(26.1-27.2)8
27.3
27.6
26.6, 27.5, 27.6
28.2, 28.8
26.7
27.4(26.7-28.1)6
24.2
29.0
25.2
27.1
25.5
24.9
27.2
25.0
24.0
23.7
1 Type of florenciae J. A. Allen, from original description.
skins without skulls.
3 Type of bicolor Tomes, from original description.
3 Specimens from Pucallpa, Sarayacu, and Lagarto Alto, respectively.
4 Type of rosilla Thomas, from original] description, external measurements from the dry
skin.
The type and paratypes are
of adults.
figure.)
Zygomatic
breadth
14,9(14.5-15.1)4
14.9
14.4, 15.4, 15.3
14,1, 14.9
13.8
1440 15.9
14.1(13.1-14.6)6
—, 14.8, 15.0
13.3, 15.5, 14.2
14.3, 14.9
14.8
13.9(13.2-14.5)7
’ ’
14.7. 14.9
14,2
15.5
14.7(13.6-15.5)5
13.5
13.0
5 Without claw.
ARBOREAL RICE RATS—-HERSHKOVITZ
Rostrum
width
5.1(4.7-5.4)6
5,3
4.9, 5.2, 5.1
4.7, 5.5
4.8
4.8, 5.0, 4.7
5.0(4.4-5.4)8
4.9, 5.1, 4.9
4.7, 5.5, 5.0
5.2, 4.8
5.0(4.8-5.4)7
5.0
b.2
4.8, 5.1, 5.3
5.2, 5.7
5.0(4.6-5.3)6
4.3
Incisive
foramina
4.8(4.5-5.0)6
4.9
5.0, 4.5, 5.1
4.7, 5.3
4.8
4.7, 4.8, 4.7
4.8(4.3-5.2)8
eS aigi tok
4.3, 4.8, 4.9
5.0, 4.9
4,5(4.2-4.9)8
4.6
4.7
4.8, 5.1, 4.9
4.8, 4.7
4.9(4.6-5.4)6
3.7
5.2
4.6
4.9
4.3
4.1
4.5
4.2
5.0
4.6
Diastema
7.1(6.2-7.6)6
det
6.9, 7.4, 7.4
6.8, 7.4
7.0
6.5, 7.0, 7.2
6.8(5.5-7.5)8
One
6.5, 6.6, 6.9
7.5, 7.4
6.5(5.8-7.0)8
6.8
6.9
6.9, 7.3, 7.4
7.2, 7.3
7.0(6.6-7.5)6
6.5
6 Type of rutilus Anthony, from original description.
7 Type of nitedulus Thomas, from original description.
8 Type of paricola Thomas, from original description.
§ Type of milleri J. A. Allen, from original description
Alveolar
length of
molar row
4.2(4.0-4.4)6
4.3
3.8, 4.6, 4.2
4.3, 4.2
3.9, 4.3, 4.2
4.1(4.0-4.3)8
4.0, 4.0, 4.0
4.4, 4.1, 3.8
3.9, 4.1
4.1(4.0-4.3)8
4.1
3.8
3.9, 4.1, 3.9
4.1, 4.1
3.9(3.8-4.2)6
3.4
3.7
3.9
(Number of specimens, when more ihan three, indicated
Zygomatic
plate width
2.5(2.3-2.7)6
2.4
2.5, 2.6, 2.3
2.3, 2.4
2.4
2.1, 2.2, 2.5
2.3(1.8-2.5)8
2.2, 2.5, 2.4
IODINE
2.3, 2.4
2.2(1.9-2.4)9
2.5
2.6
2.8, 2.2, 2.2
2.5, 2.4
2.4
537
538 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
except for an ochraceous streak on each side of the white underparts
. In one.
In five individuals from Canelos taken March 8-12, 1924, the
underparts are faintly tinged with buff; in three from the same locality,
taken in April 1910, and in two from the Rio Copataza and another
from Montalvo, the underparts are pure white. The three localities
mentioned are within a few miles of each other in the upper Rfo
Pastaza region.
Specimens from Jollin, Jatun Yacu, Llunchi, Avila, Concepcién,
San José and Rio Suno, all in the upper Rio Napo region, show the
same range of variation in color as the preceding. In one specimen
from Llunchi, however, the belly is uniformly ochraceous and hardly
defined from the sides.
The series of 11 specimens from the Rio Curaray, Loreto, Peru,
includes individuals in dark and bright pelage. One is nearly
uniformly ochraceous orange on upperparts and sides. Underparts
are white. One specimen has a pair of small ochraceous gular patches.
One of four specimens from Lagarto Alto, Rio Ucayali, Peru, in old
pelage, is nearly uniformly ochraceous tawny on head and back. This
color is defined in the form of a molt line from the darker outer sides
of shoulders and thighs. The other three specimens of the series are
dark in unworn pelage. Underparts, upper lips and lower half of
cheeks in one of two mice from Satipo, Junin, are yellowish. Under-
parts of the other specimen are sharply defined white, the lips and
cheeks ochraceous.
The remaining Peruvian material consisting of one or two individuals
from scattered localities reveal no peculiarities.
The type series of Oecomys florenciae J. A. Allen, from eastern
Colombia, is practically indistinguishable from typical bicolor as
represented by any series from eastern Ecuador. Other Colombian
specimens at hand exhibit no individual or local variables of note.
Judged by the original description, the only distinguishing character
of the Orinocoan “Rhipidomys”’ rosilla Thomas is the “buffy ochra-
ceous”’ belly of the type as compared with the pure white belly of the
type of dryas (=occidentalis) of western Ecuador. A colored belly,
however, is a common enough character in bicolor of eastern Ecuador.
In the absence of other distinctions, rosilla must be regarded as
identical with typical bicolor.
Ocecomys nitedulus Thomas of British Guiana is said to be “quite like
the Orinoco Qe. rosilla above, but the undersurface is without the
marked ochraceous wash characteristic of that animal.’ This
characterization implies that nitedulus is like typical bicolor. Indeed,
our material from British Guiana is altogether indistinguishable from
eastern Ecuadorian bicolor. I have not examined the type of Oecomys
ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 539
rutilus Anthony. Judged by the original description, it is a subadult
of the same Kartabo series identified by Anthony as nitedulus.
The description of paricola Thomas, from the state of Pard, Brazil,
like that of rosilla, was based on a comparison with western rather
than with eastern Ecuadorian representatives of bicolor. It is said
to be ‘“‘duller” in color and smaller. Of two specimens at hand from
the Rio Tapaj6z, Pard, one, an adult from Limontuba, is as small
cranially as the type; the other, from Igarapé Bravo, is a subadult
with a much larger skull. The color of either, whether dull or bright,
is like that of bicolor from eastern Ecuador or anywhere else.
Oecomys milleri J. A. Allen, from Baréo de Malgacgo, Mato Grosso,
Brazil, was aptly diagnosed in the original description as “similar in
general coloration and size to @. bicolor (Tomes).”’ A careful exami-
nation of the type, two paratopotypes, a specimen from Urupé and
another from Urucum de Corumbé confirms this characterization.
The Corumba specimen is bright ochraceous on upperparts, pure
white beneath. The topotypes are darker, with underparts yellowish
in one, pure white in the other. The Urupd individual is darkest,
tawny above, more buffy beneath.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED: One hundred and seventeen, from the
following localities:
Cotomsia: Guaicaramo, Meta, 6 (AMNH); Mambita, eastern Cundinamarca,
1 (AMNH); Andalucia, Huila, 1 (AMNH); Florencia, Rfo Orteguaza, Caquetd4,
5 (including type of florenciae, AMNH); Tres Troncos, Rio Caquetd4, Caquetd,
3 (CNHM); Rio Mecaya, mouth of Rio Caqueté, Putumayo, 3 (CNHM); Ino
Gaje, Rio Apoporis, Vaupés, 4 (CNHM).
Kcuapor: Below San José, Rio Payamino, Napo-Pastaza, 2 (AMNH); Rio
Suno, Rio Napo, Napo-Pastaza, 3 (AMNH); Avila, Rio Suno, Napo-Pastaza,
1 (USNM); Rio Jollfin, Napo-Pastaza, 2 (MCZ); Rio Jatun Yacu, Napo-Pastaza,
1 (MCZ); Llunchi, Rio Napo, Napo-Pastaza, 8 (UMMZ); Canelos, Rio Bobo-
naza, Napo-Pastaza, 8 (AMNH, 5; MCZ, 3); Montalvo, Rfo Bobonaza, Napo-
Pastaza, 1 (CNHM); Rfo Copataza, Napo-Pastaza, 3 (CNHM, 2; AMNH, 1);
Zamora, Santiago-Zamora, 6 (AMNH).
Peru: Rio Curaray, mouth at Rfo Napo, Loreto, 11 (AMNH); Monte Alegre,
Loreto, 1 (AMNH); Sarayacu, Rfo Ucayali, Loreto, 2 (AMNH); Yarinacocha,
Rfo Ucayali, Loreto, 2 (CNHM); Pucallpa, Rio Ucayali, Loreto, 1 (CNHM);
Lagarto Alto, Rio Ucayali, Loreto, 4 (AMNH); Rfo Santiago, mouth of Rfo
Marafion, 1 (AMNH); Puerto Indiana, Rio Marafion, Loreto, 1 (AMNH); Rio
Mazén, Loreto, 1 (AMNH); Tambo Yacu, Rioja, San Martin, 1 (CNHM);
Chanchamayo, Junin, 1 (CNHM); Satipo, Junin, 3 (MCZ); Pozuzo, Huanuco,
1 (CNHM).
British Gurana: Kartabo, Demerara, 12 (AMNH); Holmia, Potaro High-
lands, 1 (CNHM); Barakara, Canje River, 1 (AMNH); Essequibo River, 1 (BM,
type of nitedulus).
VENEZUELA: La Unién, Bolivar, 1 (BM, type of rosilla); Rancho Grande, Ara-
gua, 1 (AMNH); Caifio Seco, Cerro Duida, Amazonas, 1 (AMNH).
Braziu: Jauaraté, Rio Uapés, Amazonas, 2 (AMNH); Igarapé Bravo, Rio
Tapajéz, Pardé, 1 (AMNH); Limontuba, Rio Tapajéz, Pard, 1 (AMNH); between
540 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Belem and Braganza, Pard, 1 (BM, type of paricola); Recreio, Rio Majary,
Amazonas, 1 (AMNH); Urucum de Corumb4, Mato Grosso, 1 (CNHM); Baraéo
Malgacgo, Mato Grosso, 3 (including type of milleri, AMNH); Urupd, Mato
Grosso, 1 (AMNH).
Oryzomys bicolor phaeotis Thomas
Rhipidomys phexotis Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 7, p. 181, 1901.
[Oryzomys (Gicomys)] phxotis, Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 7,
p. 445, 1906 (classification).
Oryzomys (Oecomys) phaeotis, Sanborn, Publ. Mus. Hist. Nat. “Javier Prado,’
ser. A, zool., No. 6, p. 21, 1951 (Peru: Marcapata, Cuzco; Camante, Cuzco).
Rhipidomys benevolens Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 7, p. 369, 1901
(type locality, Chimate, upper Rfo Beni, La Paz, Bolivia; altitude, 700
meters above sea, level).
[Oryzomys (Gicomys)] benevolens, Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 18,
p. 445, 1906 (classification).
Oecomys benevolens, Gyldenstolpe, Kungl. Svenska Vet.-Akad. Handl., ser. 3
vol. 11, p. 40, pl. 4, fig. 1 (skull), pl. 17, fig. 11 (molars), 1982.
Types: Adult male, skin and skull (BM 1.1.1.23); collected July 23,
1900, by Perry O. Simons.
ison Locality: ‘Segrario”’ pacer upper Rio Inambari, an
affluent of the Rio Madre de Dios, Puno, southeastern Peru.
DistriputTion: Departments of Cuzco, Puno, and Madre de Dios
in southeastern Peru, and Departments of La Paz, Cochabamba, and
Beni in northwestern Bolivia; altitudinal range from approximately
200 to 2,000 meters above sea level.
Cuaracters: Largest of the subspecies; molars proportionately
larger.
MEASUREMENTs: See table 6.
Remarks: The available Peruvian specimens of phaeotis, including
the type and a paratype, are from four localities within a compara-
tively small area in the drainage basin of the upper Rio Inambari, an
affluent of the Madre de Dios. Two from Camante, Marcapata,
taken August 1950, are as large as the type of phaeotis collected July
1900. An individual from Quincemil, collected August 1953, and
another from Villa Carmen, Cosfiipata, dated September 1954, agree
with typical bicolor in size. No measurements of the paratype were
given but Thomas declared it to be ‘about the same general size” as
the type. The large Camante specimens, judged by cranial charac-
ters, are not older than the others and the molars are slightly less worn.
Rhipidomys benevolens Thomas, from the upper Rio Beni, Bolivia,
was characterized as larger than dryas (occidentalis) and smaller
than phaeotis. Representative specimens from the upper Rio Mamoré
include one subadult and three juvenals. They agree with phaeotis
in their over-all larger size and proportionately larger molars as com-
pared with typical bicolor of northeastern Peru and eastern Ecuador.
541
ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ
“WOT{dyJOSep [eUTZ]I0 WO ‘seMIOyY, $%az0aawaq Jo OdAL e “YASUI UMOIO ¢ “WOTJA]IOSEp [BU]3]IO WO ‘seTMIOY,L #170anyd Jo edA J, 1
os a 4 8°9 6F e°¢ OFT 0°8% ST ¥ SOT 96 giedeyo
= OF a9 4 og = oS 0°62 9T ha 0 GIT Orr L9P CUNY)
VIAITOg
£3 i 7 $9 oP oF L Yr PL FI oS TIT POT WeTIBO
£% oF 69 i 7 £9 o'oT 9°82 LT (46 201 Ter Trureound
Fz ‘9% LY ‘8? GL‘LL SF ‘O's g°¢ ‘Fg GOT ‘o°cT 9°08 ‘F'°6Z LT ‘LT GZ “G2 OST “6ZT SIT ‘6IT 97, UBB)
= toP 0°8 0g = £91 208 8T &% = oIT 1 O}1BI98g
oaaid
Up AOI Ivj[Ou 430
eed Jo qjsue] | emeyseIq | sumo} apa qIpveiq qso} void Ieq joo} pul TL Apoq Aqeoo'T
aryemI0sA4Z | IvpooaTy OATSIOUT TUn1jsoy dyes AZ ‘1o4xg pus pee
ed ee ee ee IS. eS ee ae
‘S7]NpD fo (SiajawyjNU UL) Sjuamainsnayy :sDWOY,T sTyoovyd Jo[ooIq sAwozsIQ—"9 ATAV I,
042 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
A skin without skull from Ticunhuaya, Bolivia, not far from the
type locality of benevolens, appears to belong here.
The largest specimens of O. bicolor phaeotis are practically in-
distinguishable from small adults of O. concolor from other parts
of tropical America. On the other hand, the size difference between
O. bicolor phaeotis and O. concolor of the same general region leaves
no doubt regarding the separate identity of the two species.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED: Eleven, from the following localities:
Peru: Sagrario, Rio Inambari, Puno, 1 (BM, type of phaeotis); Hacienda Villa
Carmen, Cosfiipata, Cuzco, 1 (CNHM); Camante, Marcapata, Cuzco, 2(CNHM);
Quincemil, Marcapata, Cuzco, 1 (CNHM).
Bouivia: Chimate, La Paz, 1 (BM, type of benevolens); El Palmal, Chaparé,
Cochabamba, 1 (MACN); Marbdn, Rio Mamoré, Beni, 3 (MACN); Ticunhuaya,
La Paz, 1 (AMNB#).
Oryzomys concolor Wagner
Distrinpution (fig. 2): Tropical and subtropical forested zones of
Costa Rica, Panama, Colombia, Venezuela, Trinidad, the Guianas,
Brazil, and the Amazonian regions of Bolivia, Peru, and Ecuador;
altitudinal range from near sea level to approximately 2,000 meters
above.
EXTERNAL CHARACTERS: Dorsal surface buffy to tawny or rufous,
with a fine to coarse mixture of dark brown; a poorly defined dark
middorsal band sometimes present; underparts sharply or hardly
defined from sides, basal portions of individual hairs white or gray;
tail from 49 to 60 percent of total length.
CRANIAL CHARACTERS (pls. 1-6, 8-11): Sides of supraorbital region
prominently ridged, often ledgelike; temporal ridges well developed
in adults for entire length of parietals; anterior zygomatic plate
moderately broad, its anteroposterior width at midpoint. usually less,
rarely equal to or slightly more, than alveolar length of M'?; upper
anterior corner of zygomatic plate slightly projecting; braincase
moderately inflated, flat or slightly convex anterodorsally at fronto-
parietal suture; posterior borders of incisive foramina usually termi-
nating anteriad to, rarely slightly behind, anterior plane of first molars;
posterior half of palatines often marked by a pair of small transverse
cornuate processes, one on each bone (one or both processes are
frequently lost in the cleaning operation but the median burr or
rugosity remains).
DENTAL CHARACTERS (pls. 46, 126): Essentially as in O. bicolor but
with first and second internal folds of M'!~? more frequently confluent
with corresponding primary folds. In extremely worn teeth, however,
these folds may be secondarily discrete.
Comparisons: Oryzomys concolor is essentially an outsize O. bicolor.
In most localities where the two species are sympatric the difference
in size is obvious. On the other hand, many small northern represen-
ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 543
tatives of concolor are hardly larger than some large southern individ-
uals of O. bicolor (pl. 5). In the Guianas, size alone is not a decisive
character. Generally, the heavier more “adult” skull of concolor
with its better developed supraorbital and temporal ridges, less inflated
braincase, and more gray or buff underparts are characters that help
separate the larger from the smaller species where the two occur
together.
Representatives of Oryzomys subflavus Wagner® of Brazil and the
Guianas have sometimes been confused with QO. concolor. The two
species are similar in color, size, and taillength. In subflavus, however,
the pelage is comparatively lax and harsh; hind foot (fig. 4c) long,
stout, with outer digits shorter, first hind toe with claw barely ex-
tending beyond base of second toe, fifth hind toe with claw extending
only to base of middle phalanx of fourth toe; sole of heel exposed;
excision of dorsal border of antorbital foramen deep, one-half or more
of width of anterior zygomatic plate exposed to view when skull is
viewed from above; supraorbital region of skull (c of pls. 8-11) broad,
its sides ridged or beaded and divergent as in concolor; zygomata less
expanded anteriorly; incisive foramina generally narrower but with
their posterior borders not extending behind anterior plane of first
molars; sphenopalatine vacuities more open but less so than in QO.
zanthaeolus (compared below); bullae more inflated; enamel pattern
of molars (pl. 12¢) essentially as in Oecomys.
Oryzomys xanthaeolus Thomas is a semiarboreal species with a
superficial resemblance to O. concolor. It occupies the dry coastal
area of western Peru and southwestern Ecuador where Oecomys is not
known to occur. Its pelage is comparatively lax, upperparts and
sides of body buffy or olivaceous, lateral line absent, underparts
not pure white; tail long as in concolor but untufted and bicolor for
most or all its length; hind foot broader than in strictly terrestrial
species but narrower than in concolor, the outer toes shorter and less
robust, interdigital webbing more developed; general shape of skull
(d of pls. 8-11) and sides of supraorbital region as in concolor but
anterior zygomatic plate projected forward so that at least one-half
its width is visible from above; incisive foramina longer, their length
at least three-fourths that of diastema, and terminating posteriorly
well behind anterior plane of first molars; sphenopalatine vacuities
large, as in O. palustris (pl. 2c), posterior border of palate without
excrescences; bullae well inflated ; enterostyles and ectostylids (pl. 12d)
rudimentary or absent.
3 “Oecomys’’ catherinae Thomas is a synonym of Oryzomys subflavus. ‘‘Oecomys’’ rer Thomas, 1910, of
British Guiana, is also a member of the same species but probably subspecifically distinct. The name,
however, clashes with ‘‘Calomys” [= Oryzomys] rer Winge, 1888. Because of the homonymy, the name of
the form described by Thomas may be changed to Oryzomys subflavus regalis (new name).
544 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Oryzomys laticeps * is a terrestrial species ranging coextensively
with Oecomys. Its resemblance to Oryzomys concolor is superficial
and restricted to body size and, in some cases, to color and texture of
pelage. In laticeps, however, the tail averages shorter, the hind foot
(fig. 4d) longer, the ear larger. The outer toes of the hind foot of
O. laticeps are shorter than in all others with which comparisons have
been made. A dark juvenal color-pelage phase and a distinct sub-
adult color-pelage phase are well marked and more consistently
present in laticeps than in other oryzomyines. The skull (e of pls.
8-11) of O. laticeps is comparatively longer than in concolor, the
supraorbital region narrower, the sides ridged or beaded but not as
widely divergent; rostrum with a more decided downward flexion;
anterior zygomatic plate projecting well forward; anteroposterior
width of zygomatic plate often more than length of M!~?; incisive
foramina extremely short, generally less than 60 percent of length of
diastema, their posterior borders separated from anterior plane of
first molars by a distance approximately equal to length of first molar;
sphenopalatine vacuities absent or small as in concolor; bones of
posteropalatal region more cancellate with the excrescences or cornu-
ate processes noted in concolor generally present and, usually, more
developed; internal folds of molars (pl. 12¢) usually absent; second
secondary fold absent in M’; second secondary folds of lower molars
greatly reduced, sometimes coalesced with major fold of opposite side.
CoLor AND PELAGE: The range of variation in color and character
of pelage in Oryzomys concolor is wider than in O. bicolor. Populations
of dry localities are distinctly paler than those of humid areas. The
pelage of high altitude forms is invariably longer and thicker than that
of their relatives of lower levels. As in O. bicolor, there are bright and
dark color phases. The tone of the bright phase in a darkly colored
population generally equals that of the dark phase of a pale colored
population. In concolor, individual molt from one color phase to the
other is obvious in a large proportion of the specimens.
Pelage of nestlings is short, fine, and colored like that of adults.
This is superseded by a longer dark gray or dark brown coat distinctly
darker than that of adults.
THE SUBSPECIES
Five geographic races are recognized. The nominate subspecies,
Oryzomys concolor concolor Wagner, occupies the greatest part of the
4 Specific synonyms of Oryzomys laticeps include bolivaris J. A. Allen, boliviae Thomas, caracolus Thomas,
casteneus Thomas, goeldi Thomas, legatus Thomas, macconnelli Thomas, magdalenae J. A. Allen, medius
Robinson and Lyon, modestus J. A. Allen, mollipilosus J. A. Allen, oniscus Thomas, perenensis J. A. Allen,
rivularis J. A. Allen, saltator Winge, sylraticus Thomas, talamancae J. A. Allen, velutinus J. A. Allen,
and a few others. Afus capito Olfers (1818), based on the “rat & grosse tate” of Azara, is undoubtedly the
same species and antedates Mus laticeps Lund (1841). Afus cephalotes Desmarest (1819) is another name
for Azara’s “‘rat & grosse téte.”
ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 545
range of the species. It is a medium-sized, brightly colored form
with an irregular pattern of geographic variation that reflects seasonal
and local climatic differences. Nevertheless, individual variation in
any one locality may be of the same magnitude as variation within the
subspecies as a whole.
The remaining four subspecies occupy peripheral and ecologically
distinct parts of the range of the species. Oryzomys concolor superans
Thomas, of the Amazonian rain forests along the base of the Andes, is
the darkest and largest race. O.c. speciosus J. A. Allen and Chapman
of the northeastern bulge of South America resembles superans in
color, especially of the underparts, but agrees with typical concolor
in size. The palest subspecies, 0. concolor robertt Thomas, lives in the
subhumid southern border of the range in Bolivia and south-central
Brazil. O. concolor bahiensis (new subspecies) is a saturate form of the
rain forests of eastern Brazil.
The pattern of local and geographic variation in Oryzomys concolor
contrasts sharply with the comparative stability of O. bicolor. The
difference between the two species in their response to color of soil
and cover, humidity and temperature may be attributed to slight but
significant differences in their habitat preferences. Oryzomys concolor
generally nests lower and descends to the ground with greater fre-
quency. It is, accordingly, less independent of factors controlling
living conditions at ground level.
Oryzomys (Oecomys) concolor concolor Wagner
Hesperomys concolor Wagner, Arch. Naturg., vol. 11, pt. 1, p. 147, 1845; Abh.
Akad. Wiss., Munich, vol. 5, p. 311, 1848 (characters) —Pelzeln, K. K. Zool.-
Bot. Gesellsch., Wien, Beiheft 33, p. 70, 1883 (characters; habits).—Gylden-
stolpe, Kungl. Svenska Vet-Akad. Handl., ser. 3, vol. 11, p. 151, 1932 (in-
certae sedis).—J. A. Allen and Chapman, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist.,
vol. 5, p. 213, 1893 (comparison with Oryzomys speciosus ‘‘with which it may
prove to be identical’’).
[Oryzomys] concolor, Tate, Amer. Mus. Nov., No. 579, p. 3, 1932 (taxonomic
history).
Oryzomys flavicans Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 6, vol. 14, p. 351, 1894
(type locality, Mérida, Sierra de Mérida, Venezuela).
O[ryzomys] flavicens [sic], Goodwin, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 102, p. 310,
1953 (lapsus for flavicans Thomas, in discussion of O. palmarius J. A. Allen).
Oryzomys flavicans illectus Bangs, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, vol. 12, p. 164, 1898
(type locality, Pueblo Viejo, Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Magdalena,
Colombia, altitude, 853 meters.—Bangs, Proc. New England Zool. Club,
vol. 1, p. 94, 1900 (Colombia: La Concepcién; Pueblo Viejo; Palomino;
San Antonio; Oryzomys trichurus J. A. Allen, part, a synonym).
O[ryzomys] flavicans illectus, J. A. Allen, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 12,
p. 206, 1899 (Minca, Santa Marta Region, Magdalena, Colombia).
Oryzomys illectus, J. A. Allen, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 20, pp. 436, 439,
1904 (Don Amo, Magdalena, Colombia).
504676—59 —_3
546 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Oryzomys flavicans subluteus Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 2, p. 268,
1898 (type locality, ‘‘W. Cundinamarca,” i.e., western slope of Cordillera
Oriental, Cundinamarca, Colombia).
O[ryzomys] subulatus [sic], Goodwin, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 102, p. 302,
1953 (lapsus for subluteuws Thomas, in discussion of Oryzomys helvolus).
Oryzomys trichurus J. A. Allen, Bull..Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 12, p. 206, 1899
(type locality, El Libano, near Bonda, Santa Marta, Magdalena, Colombia,
altitude 500 feet); vol. 20, p. 487, 1904 (Bonda, Colombia).—Tate, Bull.
Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 76, p. 190, 1939 (‘“‘juv. and synonym of illectus’’).—
Goodwin, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 102, p. 301, 1953 (type history).
Rhipidomys marmosurus Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 4, p. 378, 1899
(type locality, Maipures, middle Rfo Orinoco, Vichada, eastern Colombia).
[Oryzomys (Cicomys)] marmosurus, Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 18,
p. 445, 1906.
Oecomys marmosurus, Tate, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 76, p. 194, 1939
(listed).
G@[comys] marmosurus, Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 8, vol. 6, p. 187, 1910
(comparisons).
Oryzomys tectus Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 8, p. 251, 1901 (type
locality, Bugaba (misspelled ‘‘Bogava”’), Chiriqui, Panama, 250 meters alti-
tude).
Oryzomys tectus tectus, Goldman, North American Fauna, No. 43, p. 84, 1918
(revision; Boruca, Costa Rica)—Goodwin, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist.,
vol. 87, p. 394, 1946 (Costa Rica: Boruca, Puntarenas; San Gerénimo de
Pirris, San José).
Oryzomys klagest J. A. Allen, Bull. Amer..)Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 20, p. 827, 1904
(type locality, El Llagual [Yagual], near Maripa, lower Rfo Caura, Bolivar,
Venezuela).—Tate, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 76, pp. 190, 191,1939
(listed as member of “trinitatis group”? of Oryzomys (p. 190)).—Goodwin,
Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 102, p. 301, 1953 (type history; ‘‘probably a
subspecies of O. flavicens [sic] Thomas’’).
Rhipidomys (?) klagest, Gyldenstolpe, Kungl. Svenska Vet.-Akad. Handl., ser. 3,
vol. 11, p. 50, 1932 (type a Rhipidomys [!] according to Tate, ex litt).
Ccomys tapajinus Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 8, vol. 3, p. 378, 1909
(type locality, Santa Rosa, Rio Jamanchin, Rio Tapajéz, Pard, Brazil) ;
ser. 8, vol. 9, p. 87, 1912 (Marajé6, Pard, Brazil); ser. 9, vol. 6, p. 277, 1920
(Brazil: Villa Braga, Rio Tapajéz, Par4; Monte Alegre, Rio Solimées, Para;
Manacapurt, Rio Solimées, Amazonas).
Oryzomys frontalis Goldman, Smithsonian Mise. Coll., vol. 56, p. 6, 1912 (type
locality, Corozal, Canal Zone, Panama).
Oryzomys tectus frontalis, Goldman, North American Fauna, No. 43, p. 85, pl. 4,
figs. 4, 4a (skull), pl. 5, fig. 10 (mandible), pl. 6, figs. 7, 7a (molars), 1918,
(Panama: Cana; Corozal, Canal Zone). Smithsonian Mise. Coll., vol. 69,
p. 101, 1920 (Panama: Cana; Corozal; Tacarcuna).
Oryzomys helvolus J. A. Allen, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 32, p. 597, 1913
(type locality, Villavicencio, upper Rfo Meta, Meta, Colombia); vol. 35, p.
212, 916 (Colombia: Villavicencio; Buenavista—Goodwin, Bull. Amer.
Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 102, p. 302, 1953 (‘probably a subspecies of O. flavicens
[sic]; may equal O. subulatus [sic] Thomas’’).
Oryzomys vicencianus J. A. Allen, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 32, p. 598,
1913 (type locality, Villavicencio, Meta, Colombia); J. A. Allen, vol. 35, p.
212, 1916 (Villavicencio, Colombia) —Goodwin, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat.
Hist., vol. 102, p. 302, 1953 (type history and measurements).
ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 547
[Oryzomys] vicencianus, Tate, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 76, p. 190, 1939
(‘juv. and synonym of helvolus’’).
Ccomys mincae J. A. Allen, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 32, p. 603, 1913
(type locality, Minca, Santa Marta region, Magdalena, Coiombia).—Good-
win, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 102, p. 301, 1953 (type history).
Cicomys caicarae J. A. Allen, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 32, p. 603, 1913
(type locality, Caicara, Rio Orinoco, Bolivar, Venezuela).
Oecomys caicarae, Goodwin, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 102, p. 300, 1953
(type history and measurements).
Oecomys guianae caicarae, Tate, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 76, p. 193, 1939
(Venezuela: Mt. Duida; Casiquiare).
Oryzomys trinitatis, Tate (not Allen and Chapman), Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist.,
vol. 76, p. 190, 1939 (part; Venezuela: Agitita; Mt. Duida).
Type: Presumably in the Vienna Natural History Museum; col-
lected Aug. 4, 1831, by Johann Natterer; original number, 174.
Type Locauiry: Rio Curicuriari, an affluent of the upper Rio
Negro, entering from the right below Sao Gabriel, Amazonas, Brazil.
DistrisuTion: Tropical and subtropical forested zones of Costa
Rica, Panama, northwestern Colombia, and eastern Colombia in
the Rio Orinoco drainage system, western and southern Venezuela in
the Lake Maracaibo and the middle and upper Rio Orinoco basins,
the Amazonian rain forest of Brazil and their extensions into extreme
northern Bolivia, eastern Peru, and eastern Ecuador; altitudinal
range, sea level to approximately 2,000 meters above.
CHARACTERS: Generally brightly colored, upperparts ochraceous
buff to tawny finely ticked with dark brown, chest and belly white to
buff, throat and chin white.
MEASUREMENTS: See table 7.
VARIATION: Two specimens from the type region are at hand.
One, from Jauaraté, Rio Uaupés, above the type locality, is larger
than the type, its belly with a light buffy wash. The other, from
Yauanari, Rio Negro, below the type locality, is smaller, with belly,
chest, and sides ochraceous buff. Underparts of the type are sharply
defined white. The same range of variation in color of underparts
obtains in most populations of the species.
The type of Oecomys tapajinus Thomas and two other specimens
from Tauary, in the type region on the Rio Tapajéz, Brazil, do not
differ from concolor of the Rio Negro-Rio Orinoco basin. The under-
parts of one of the two Tauary specimens is creamy, most notably on
chest, throat, and chin; in the other, the same parts are sharply defined
white. A specimen from Lago Cuiteud, on the opposite side of the
SolimGes, is practically identical. A young individual from the Boca
do Igarapé Piaba, also on the north bank of the Solimées, shows the
old pelage being replaced by a more saturate new pelage.
The type of marmosurus Thomas, from the middle Rio Orinoco,
Colombia, is not significantly different from any other individual of
548
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM
VOL. 110
TaBLE 7.—Oryzomys concolor concolor Wagner: Measurements (in millimeters)
Locality Head and body Tail Hind foot Ear mere
Costa RICA
San Gerénimo 125 149 28 — 34.5
E1 General 146 142 27 — 32.6
PANAMA
Boruca 118, 125 140, 123 27, 28 _ 31.0, 31.1
Bugaba ! 140, 122 142, 147 27, 29 18, — —, 33.2
Cana § 148 161 30 — 35.5
Cana 126 (114-137)6 148(127-162)6 28 (26-29)6 | — 31.4 (28.8-34.0)7
COLOMBIA
Socorré 129, 130, 143 154, 140, 154 28, 28, 29 18, 17, 18 33.7, —, 33.9
Catival 132 146 28 17 31.4
Muzo 128 140 29 16 31.8
Pueblo Viejo ¢ 132 160 25 5 17 _-
Pueblo Viejo 136(122-145)6 145(140-155)5 26(25-27)5 | 17(15-18)5 30.4(29.8-31.1) 4
Palomino 140 145 26 16 32.3
Don Diego 127(111-137)8 149 (136-165)8 26(25-28)8 | — 31.6(30.5-32.3)5
Bonda 120 155 _ _ 28.8
E] Lfbano 6 121 160 25 —_ 30.0
Minca? 126 160 25 _— —
Pueblo Bello 122, 114 136, 147 24, 26 17, 20 30.5, 31.4
E! Orinoco 129, 120 145, 135 24, 25 18, 17 29.2, 30.2
Villanueva 120(116-127) 4 151 (133-165) 4 24(23-25)4 | 16.5(15-17)4 | 29.7, 30.2
Sierra Negra 125 (116-136) 4 141 (133-153) 4 25(24-27)4 | 18(18-19)4 30.1(29.4-31.2)8
Marimondas 128, 140 151, 150 25, 26 17, 19 30.4, 32.8
Buena Vista 125(115-131)5 135(123-167)5 27 (25-28)5 | — 31.8(31.2-32.6) 4
Guaicaramo _ = 28 _ 35.2
Villavicencio § 134 143 27 _ 34
Villavicencio 1° 120 130 27 — 29
VENEZUELA
Cogollo 130 154 26 _— 31.8
Azulita 136, 146 148, 169 28, 29 — 32.5, 34.4
Mérida 1! 116 129 245 — _
Mérida _ — — — 30.7 (28.3-31.6) 14
Caicara 13 122 152 25 16 30.2
Caicara 119 144 26 _ 30.7
Yagual 4 127 121 25 _ 32.0
Casiquiare 107 136 26 = 31.3
E] Merey 129 156 26 —_ 30.8
Esmeralda 122, 121 140, 145 28, 26 _ 30.6, 30.9
Ihuapo 120 132 26 _ 31.2
Ocama 125 155 2 _ 33.0
BRAZIL
Curicuriari 126 124 _— _— =
Curicuriari 1° 124 137 — _ —
Jauaraté 137 148 28 _ _-
Yavanari 115 125 27 _ 31.8
Cuiteué 140 150 27 _ 33.1
Santa Rosa 17 126 158 25 § 17 =
Tauary 142 158 27 _ 33.8
Manapiri 114 153 27 16 =
SEEPS EY SRS RAST LUE SN Le eh ee SU ee ee!
1 Type of tectus Thomas, from original description, followed by a paratype (USN M).
2 Possibly crown length.
3 Type of frontalis Goldman, from original description.
4 Type of illectus Bangs, from original description.
6 Without claw.
6 Type of trichurus J. A. Allen, from original description.
1 Type of mincae J. A. Allen, from original description.
8 Type of helvolue J. A. Allen, from original description.
§ Probably=5.2 mm.
of adults.
Zygomatic
breadth
17.0
17.0
15.8
17.0, 16.5
18
16.5(15.4-17.4)7
16.6, 16.2, 17.6
15.4
16.8
16.3, 17.1
17.3
15.3
15.0
15.7, 16.8
16.4, 16.0
15(14.8-15.3)3
16.1(15.2-17.1)4
15.9, 16.4
16.6(16.1-17.2)5
16.3
16.3, 17.4
16.5(15.6-16.9) 4
213
16.9
17.0
16.4
16.3
16.6, 17.1
ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ
Rostrum width
5.9, 5.6, 6.2
5.6
5.5
5.5(5.3-5.7) 4
5.6
5.7(5.4-6.3)5
5.5
5.6, 5.6
5.5, 5.6
5.4(5.1-5.6)5
5.5(5.2-5.8) 4
5.2, 5.5
5.9(5.6-6.3)5
6.5
5.9
5.9, 6.5
5.7(5.3-6.2)16
5.8
Incisive
foramina
6.3, 5.7, 5.8
5.5
5.4
5.4(4.7-5.8) 4
5.6
5.6(5.2-5.9)6
4.8
5.0
5.1, 6.0
4.9, 5.5
5.1(4.8-5.3)5
5.4(5.2-5.6) 4
5.3, 5.7
5.8(5.6-6.0)5
5.8
Diastema
7.7(7.2-7.9) 4
8.2
7.9(7.6-8.2)6
7.1
7.7, 8.0
ss atlads
7.3(7.0-7.5)5
7.4(7.0-7.7)4
7.5, 8.0
8.2(7.9-8.8)5
9.1
7.5(7.0-7.9)19
7.6
10 Type of vicencianus J. A. Allen, from original description.
il Type of flavicans Thomas, from original description.
13 Type of caicarae J. A. Allen, from original description.
18 In the original description, ‘13.6 mm.” is obviously wrong.
14 Type of klagesi J. A. Allen, from original description.
18 Type of concolor Wagner, from original description.
16 Type, collector’s measurements according to Pelzeln, 1833 (K. K. Zool.-Bot. Gesellsch., Wien., Beih.,
vol. 33, p. 70).
17 Type of tapajinus Thomas, from original description.
Alveolar length
of molar row
5.0
5.1, 5.0, 5.2
5.1
4.9
5.0(4.7-5.2) 4
5.5
4.9(4.6-5.2)8
4.4, 4.6
4.7(4.6-4.9)5
4.9(4.7-5.0) 4
4.7, 4.9
5.1(4.9-5.5)6
5.5
4.7
5.3, 4.9
4.83
5.0(4.7-5.4) 21
5.0
4.5
549
(Number of specimens, when more than three, tndicated by italic figure.)
Zygomatic
plate width
3.9
3.9
3.1, 3.2
—, 3.8
3.3(2.9-3.9))7
3.8, 2.7, 3.5
3.3
3.3
3.2(3.1-3.4) 4
3.7
3.4(3.1-3.6)8
3.0
3.1, 3.4
2.8, 2.8
2.8(2.6-2.9)6
3.3(3.0-3.6) 4
3.5, 3.2
3.7(3.5-3.9)5
4.1
3.3
3.3, 3.4
3.1
3.1(2.8-3.5) 21
3.1
3.3
2.9
3.38, 3.0
3.3
3.3
550 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
the subspecies concolor. Its belly is tinged with buffy, the hairs of the
throat, chest, and groins white. Oryzomys klagesi J. A. Allen, from
El Llagual (or Yagual), Rio Caura, farther down the Rio Orinoco, is
nearer true concolor than speciosus, with which it was originally com-
pared. O¢ecomys caicarae J. A. Allen is the third name given to the
middle Rio Orinoco population of concolor. The duskier coloration
of the upperparts in the type series indicates a cline leading to the
darker speciosus in northeastern Venezuela and Trinidad.
Twelve specimens from the upper Rio Meta region, Colombia
(Villavicencio, Buena Vista, Mambita, Guaicaramo, Medina), repre-
senting Oryzomys helvolus J. A. Allen and vicencianus J. A. Allen agree
with concolor of the upper Rio Negro-Rio Orinoco region in size, but
are more saturate on underparts and as dark on upperparts and sides
as O. concolor superans. An extremely large female from Guaicaramo,
like the type of frontalis, is equal in size to average adult superans.
Morphologically and geographically, however, the mice of the Colom-
bian base of the Andes in Orinoco drainage are nearest true concolor.
Thirty-six topotypes of flavicans Thomas from Mérida, Venezuela,
vary remarkably little inter se. Their upperparts are uniformly pale,
their bellies whitish with a light to moderate, never a heavy, buffy
wash.
Three mice from La Azulita in the Maracaibo basin at the foot of the
Sierra de Mérida are indistinguishable from the Mérida series. A
specimen from Rio Cogollo on the Sierra de Perijé side of Lake
Maracaibo is brighter above, more buffy beneath, and quite like
individuals from the Colombian side of the same mountain range.
The relationship of the intensity of body color to rainfall is shown
by specimens from diverse localities in the Sierra Nevada de Santa
Marta. The darkest specimens are from the humid Don Diego region
at the base of the mountains. Topotypes of zlectus Bangs from the
equally humid but cooler northern slope of the Sierra average paler.
A series from the humid locality of Pueblo Bello on the southern side
of the range is colored like topotypes of illectus. In the warmer, less
humid El Salado, farther down the eastern slope, the mice average
paler. Thirteen specimens from the comparatively dry Rio Cesar
valley (Villanueva; El Orinoco) between the Sierra Nevada and
Sierra de Perij4 are smaller and extremely pale, their underparts more
nearly pure white. They were taken from the early part of the dry
season in January to the beginning of the rainy season in April. The
January specimens are darkest, their pelage in good condition. In
the March specimens, the pelage is faded and molting. April speci-
mens show the darker new pelage on the middorsal region. The
contrast is quite marked between the pale, comparatively short-haired
valley mice of the dry season and the saturate prime pelage of speci-
ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 551
mens taken during the rainy season on the comparatively cool slopes
of the Sierra Nevada and the Sierra de Perija.
Oryzomys trichurus J. A. Allen is founded on a juvenal and Oecomys
mincae J. A. Allen on an adult, both from localities near Bonda in
the semiarid northwestern corner of the Sierra Nevada de Santa
Marta. They are like the small pale mice of the ecologically similar
valley at the western base of the Sierra. One specimen at hand from
Bonda is virtually a dwarf.
The range of variation in color, size, and degree of development of
the supraorbital ridges shown by the mice of the Sierra Nevada de
Santa Marta region is greater than in those of any other single region.
The tendency for each stream valley branch in each altitudinal zone
to produce a distinctive population is one of the most striking bio-
logical phenomena of the Sierra.
Oryzomys flavicans subluteus Thomas from ‘‘W. Cundinamarca,”
Colombia, was described as similar to Venezuelan flavicans “but dis-
tinguished by its darker belly.” Three specimens at hand from
Paime, Rio Minero, western Cundinamarca, with underparts lightly
washed buffy are absolutely indistinguishable from topotypes of
flavicans. ‘Two specimens from Muzo, western Boyacdé, and but a
few miles downstream (north) from Paime, with underparts entirely
buff except for the white throat and chin are exactly lke the type of
subluteus.
Oryzomys tectus Thomas was described as more brightly colored
than flavicans and with “remarkably expanded supraorbital ridges.”
The difference in color between western Panamanian tecius and Vene-
zuelan flavicans lies well within the limits of variations common to
any large population from either region. Supraorbital ridges are
present in all members of the species and are more prominent in older
than in younger individuals. It is true, nevertheless, that the ridges
are more uniformly developed and ledgelike in most Central Ameri-
can and western Colombian mice than in many other series of the
subspecies.
Western Colombian (Socorré, Puri, Catival) mice are indistinguish-
able from their Panamanian relatives. In one specimen from Puri,
Antioquia, the upperparts and sides are grizzled with an interspersion
of wholly white cover hairs. A female from Socorré, upper Rio Sint,
Cérdoba, shows the molt from dark to bright pelage.
The name frontalis Goldman is based on eastern Panamanian mice
that are less tawny above and less buffy beneath than the average of
western Panamanian tectus. The difference, although locally con-
stant, is slight.
Remarks: The original description of Hesperomys concolor includes
the following Latin diagnosis: “H[esperomys] fulvus, subtus abrupte
552 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
albus, pedibus fuscentibus; cauda nuda longitudine corporis; pilis
gastraci unicoloribus.”’
Measurements, presumably taken from the dry skin are: ‘‘Kérper
[head and body], 4’’ 10’ [=126 mm.] and Schwanz [tail] 4’’ 9’’” [=124
mm.].”’ These measurements do not tally with those taken in the
flesh by the collector (see below). Either set of measurements, how-
ever, lies within the range of variation for the species. Wagner
compared the type of concolor with the larger Hesperomys anguya
(= Oryzomys buccinatus Olfers) and noted that in the former the
color of the upperparts are much brighter, more reddish, the hair of
the underparts pure white, the cheeks without the gray as in anguya,
the feet covered with brownish hair, and the tail dark and with short
hairs.
Field notes by the collector, Johann Natterer, published by Pelzeln
(1883) are translated from the German as follows:
The tarsus [of the type of concolor] is much broader than that of No. 173 [Hespe-
romys russatus Wagner=Holochilus brasiliensis Desmarest]. My dogs found it
in the opening of a hollow tree and I got it out with the aid of a mattock. Its
color is exactly like that of a reddish, white-bellied mouse from Ypanema [?
species]. Incisors ochraceous; ears round, gray brown, the base grayish buff,
toes and upperside of tarsus apparently naked and covered with small brown
scales on a buffy base where, on closer inspection, extremely fine short hairs
become visible. The hairs are somewhat longer at the roots of the claws but
do not extend as far as the tips of the claws. Only 6/’’’ [13 mm.] of the base of
the tail is covered with fur. Total length, 10’ [=261 mm.], tail 5%’’ [=137
mm.].
The size, color, broad hind foot, and relatively long and thinly
haired tail of concolor are diagnostic of Oecomys. There is no other
cricetine in the upper Rio Negro region with which it can be confused.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED: One hundred and sixty-one, from the follow-
ing localities:
Costa Rica: San Gerénimo, San José, 1 (CNHM); El General, Puntarenas,
1 (UMMZ); Boruca, 2 (CM).
Panama: Bugaba, Chiriqui, 2 (BM, type of tectus; USNM, 1); Barro Colorado,
Canal Zone, 1 (UMMZ); Cana, Darién, 11 (USNM, 9 including type of frontalis;
CNHM, 2).
Cotomstia: Catival, Cérdoba, 1 (CNHM); Socorré, Rfo Sint, Cérdoba, 3
(CNHM); Purif, Rio Cauca, Antioquia, 1 (CNHM); Muzo, Rfo Minero, Boyacé,
2 (CNHM); “W. Cundinamarca,” 1 (BM, type of subluteus); Paime, Rio Minero,
Cundinamarca, 3 (AMNH); Pueblo Viejo, Magdalena, 5 (AMNH, 3; MCZ, 2);
Concepcion, Magdalena, 1 (MCZ); Palomino, Magdalena, 1 (MCZ); Don Diego,
Magdalena, 8 (CM); Bonda, Magdalena, 3 (AMNH); Mamatoca, Magdalena, 1
(AMNH); El Lfbano, Magdalena, 1 (AMNH, type of trichurus); Minea, Mag-
dalena, 1 (AMNH, type of mincae; Pueblo Bello, Magdalena, 3 (USNM); El
Salado, Magdalena, 5 (USNM); El Orinoco, Rfo Cesar, Magdalena, 7 (USNM);
Villanueva, Magdalena, 6 (USNM); Sierra Negra, Sierra de Periji, 4 (USNM);
Las Marimondas, 2 (USNM); Mambita, Cundinamarca, 2 (AMNH); Medina,
Cundinamarca, 1 (AMNH); Buenavista, Meta 5 (AMNH); Guaicaramo, Meta, 2
ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 553
(AMNH); Villavicencio, Meta, 2 (AMNH, types of helvolus and vicencianus) ;
Maipures, Rfo Orinoco, Vichada, 1 (BM, type of marmosurus).
VENEZUELA: Rfo Cogollo, Mérida, 1 (CNHM); La Azulita, Mérida, 4 (CNHM);
Mérida, Mérida (includes Cafetos de Mérida, Milla, Lourdes, Chama, Montes de la
otra banda) 37 (BM, type of flavicans; AMNH, 23; CNHM, 3; USNM, 10);
Caicara, Rio Orinoco, Bolivar, 4 (AMNH, includes type of catcarae); El Yagual, 1
(AMNH, type of klagesi); Rio Casiquiare, Amazonia, 1 (AMNH); Rfo Casi-
quiare, near Raudal Tamasd, Amazonia, 1 (AMNH); El Merey, Rio Casiquiare,
Amazonia, 2 (AMNH); Esmeralda, Rio Orinoco, Amazonia, 3 (AMNH); Ihuapo,
Rio Orinoco, Amazonia, 1 (AMNH); Rfo Ocama, mouth, at Rio Orinoco, Ama-
zonia, 3 (AMNH).
Braziu: Jauaraté, Rio Uaupés, Amazonas, 1 (AMNH); Yavanari, Rio Negro,
Amazonas, 1 (AMNH); Igarapé Piaba, mouth, Rio Amazonas, Pard, 1 (MCZ);
Lago Cuiteud, Rio Amazonas, Pard, 1 (MCZ); Rosarhinho, Lago Miguel, Rio
Madeira, Amazonas, 1 (AMNH); Tauary, Rio Tapajéz, Pard, 2 (MCZ); Ilha
Manapiri, Rio Tocantins, Pard, 1 (AMNH); Bardo de Melgago, Mato Grosso,
3 (AMNB#).
Oryzomys concolor speciosus J. A. Allen and Chapman
Oryzomys speciosus J. A. Allen and Chapman, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist.,
vol. 5, p. 212, 1893; vol. 9, p. 18, 1897 (Caparo, Trinidad).—Goodwin, Bull.
Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 102, p. 300, 1953 (type history and measurements).
Oryzomys trinitatis J. A. Allen and Chapman, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 5,
p. 213, 1893 (type locality, Prince’s Town, Trinidad); vol. 9, p. 18, 1897 (Trini-
dad: Caparo; Caura).—Tate, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 76, p. 190,
1939 (Bartica, British Guiana; Arabupu, Mt. Roraima, and Sucre, Venezuela;
and Trinidad. Synonyms: palmarius, fulviventer)—Goodwin, Bull. Amer.
Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 102, p. 301, 1953 (type history and measurements).
Oryzomys palmarius J. A. Allen, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 12, p. 211, 1899
(type locality, Quebrada Seca, Rfo Manzanares, Cumanacoa, Sucre, Venezuela;
another specimen from Los Palmales, Sucre).—Goodwin, Bull. Amer. Mus.
Nat. Hist., vol. 102, p. 301, 1953 (type history; ‘‘may be a subspecies of O.
ffavicens [sic =flavicans] Thomas’’).
Oryzomys fulviventer J. A. Allen, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 12, p. 212, 1899
(type locality, Quebrada Seca, Cumanacoa, Sucre, Venezuela).—Goodwin,
Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 102, p. 301, 1953 (type history and measure-
ments).
Ccomys guianae Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 8, vol. 6, p. 187, 1910 (type
locality, Supinaam River, Demerara, British Guiana).—Anthony, Zoologica,
vol. 3, No. 18, p. 274, 1921 (Kartabo, British Guiana).
Oecomys guianae guianae, Tate, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 76, p. 198, 1939
(listed).
CGcomys splendens Hayman, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 11, vol. 1, p. 381, 1938
(type locality, Mayaro, southeastern Trinidad).
Oecomys auyantepui Tate, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 76, p. 193, 1939
(type locality, southern slopes of Mt. Auyan-tepuf, Rio Caroni, Bolivar,
Venezuela, altitude, 3,500 feet)—Goodwin, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist.,
vol. 102, p. 302, 1953 (type history and measurements).
Type: Adult female, skin and skull (AMNH 5942/4672) collected
Apr. 26, 1893, by Frank M. Chapman.
TYPE LocauLity: Prince’s Town, Trinidad.
554. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Disrrisution: Trinidad, the Guianas, and eastern Venezuela,
including the coast and delta and basin of the lower Rfo Orinoco;
altitudinal range from sea level to about 1,500 meters above.
Cuaracters: Like concolor but darker throughout; upperparts
tawny finely ticked with dark brown; underparts gray, sometimes
whitish or buffy with the plumbeous basal portions of the hairs
showing through.
MEASUREMENTS: See table 8.
Variation: Underparts vary from whitish to dark gray with or
without a light buffy wash. In all specimens, however, the basal
portions of the hairs of belly and chest are plumbeous and show
through the surface. A pectoral streak is present in the two speci-
mens from Caura, Trinidad, and in the specimens from Quebrada
Seca and Neveri, Venezuela.
Remarks: Of a series of four specimens collected in Prince’s Town,
Trinidad, Allen and Chapman described one as Oryzomys speciosus
and the others as O. trinitatis. The basal portions of the belly hairs
in the first are more nearly white than in the others. The authors
noted that “in size, proportions and coloration [speciosus] strongly
suggests Hesperomys concolor Wagner.” Paradoxically, they failed
to recognize the same relationship to the specimen they named
trinitatis.
Oryzomys palmarius J. A. Allen and Oryzomys fulviventer J. A. Allen
are likewise based on differently colored individuals of a small series
taken from Noy. 23 through Dec. 10, 1898, in Quebrada Seca, Sucre,
Venezuela. In the first, the underparts are typically grayish white
with the dark basal color of the hairs showing through. In the second,
the belly is buffy, the throat whitish.
When Thomas erected the subgenus Oecomys in 1906, he failed to in-
clude in it the named forms speciosus, trinitatis, palmarius and fulviven-
ter. A consequence of the omission was a dual system of classification
and the multiplication of names for the eastern Venezuelan and Guianan
race of Oryzomys concolor. Thus, Oecomys guianae Thomas, described
in 1910, was compared only with marmosurus of Venezuela and tapa-
jinus of Brazil, while Oecomys splendens Hayman was described in 1938
as the first Trinidad record of arboreal rice rats.
The two specimens from Auyan-tepui, on which the description
of Oecomys auyantepur Tate is based, are colored like other mainland
representatives of speciosus. ‘Their shorter hind feet and narrower
zygomatic plates, however, are more nearly as in O. bicolor. A skull
only from Kartabo, British Guiana, also has the narrow zygomatic
plate. Its small molars also indicate affinity with O. bicolor. Osten-
sibly, the large and small species of arboreal rice rats have not diverged
as widely in the Guianan region as they have elsewhere.
505
ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ
-xo9 ue oq ABU YY ‘UIOM A[IUMIOI}XO SIC[OUL UIA (Sefer HNIAV) ATUO [[NyS V er
“WOJdLIosep [BUISIIO WOT ‘sBUOYL, aunINb Jo OdA YF, gt
"4070014 ShuozfhiQ JO [eNPLAIPUI a31e] ATIUIII3
epeiqenyd ‘AjI[voo] ed A,
*MO1 Je[OUL 10} 9'F PUB ‘{[N¥S JO q4ZUCT [eseq-O[Apuod
IOJ 9°8Z ‘JOO} PULY IOJ ‘WIT EF SOAIS 032,
‘TINg) So61 ‘UIMpOOy WOJ] MOI IvjOM PUB YYpPvoIq O1YwUI0ZAzZ ‘AAp “4OOJ PUT 11
‘UOI}AIIOSOp [BUISIIO WO ‘aj BJ, NdayuvAnd jo edd, ot
“WNpeqnsg 6
“UOMALIOSOP [VUISIIO WOT MOTT W “VW 'f 4azwaarpnf yo ad, 5
“(206 “d ‘ZOT “JOA “ISTH “JN “sayy “Jeury
"Bddg
“UOT}C1Osep [CUISIO WOT ‘UdTTW “Wf snzuvwjpd Jood Ay, ;
“WIM 63 = YSU] |BSVq-OJAPUOD 4
"MBO INOYITM ¢
*[OGOo[S UI psArosoid UeuITO8ds MOI}
SJUOMIAMSeeUT [BUIO}X9 /WOT4ZAIIOSep [VUIZIIO WO ‘uRUARTT Suapuazds jo eddy, 5
‘UOTJAIIOSap |VU[SIIO MIO ‘Ue[TW “WL $27092U227 JO SGA, ¢
“Y}3Ud[ UAOID ¢
‘UOTJdIJOSsp [VUTSIIO UOJ ‘UaITW “Vf Ssnsozads Jo odAy, 1
L LY £8
= t6F ae
¥§ es V8
9% og 08
LZ toP aa
ae ¥¢ ol
= 64 82
= 20°¢ =
a 20°¢ —<
Le ‘ve e'9 ‘Fg 0°8 ‘62
8's Vg ¥8
9¢ Q°g 62
sé 1g 6°38
— o°¢ —
3 Tg 0'8
= cup ¥'8
= top Z
TpIm MOI Ieloul
93v1d Jo [4309] BUIOISeIC.
Oe ULOsAZ IBlOOALV
os
Lg
BUTUIeIOT
OAISTOUT
Hg ‘8°¢
9°9
6g
69
39
qypra
UWINISOY
O°9T
LT
WLI ‘GOT
O'LT
FLT
Q°ST
9'9T
SLT
SLT
TY pvolq
dIYVULOZAZ
GSE “BIE
PEE
ote
ors
=
OCE
GCE
S'0€
sud]
4so} 8013
“TIn4AS
9T
Bid §
96 got
16 9Si
vG OIT
ee 4 €&T
13 6FT
LG =
Ka 6El
¥G OST
RG ELG SCT ‘CET
— 1&1
= cor
9% Tel
9 SZ OFT
9% SST
GG SFI
174 LET
joo} PUI} TeL
GZI ‘Se
L&T
OIT
6cT
OIT
€2T
iat
Apoq
pue peeyy
¢] OGUALE MY
z ulueuIdng
VNVIO4) HSILINg
ndnqeiy
IndajusAny
o JVdequesny
WoAeN
6 8098 "O
g 08g *O
1 809g OD
VIGOAZINTA
BMeO
S}8d “48
woeulng
PoRRy ueg
7 OLBABIAT
UAMO,], $,90UlIg
¢ UMOT, S,e0ULIg
1 UMOYL, $00
avaINiaT,
Aqyeoo'T
*(pajou asanayj0 asaym ydaoxa) sznpo fo (Suajawmipjiu UL) sJUaweinsDayy :unuwdnyD puv Uap “p's snsoweds 1ojooUCD sATMIOZAIO-—'Q ATAV],
556 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
SPECIMENS EXAMINED: Twenty-eight, from the following localities:
TRINIDAD: Prince’s Town, 4 (AMNH, includes types of speciosus and trinitatzs) ;
Caura, 2 (AMNH); Mayaro, 1 (BM, type of splendens); Cumaca, 1 (AMNH);
St. Pats, 1 (AMNH); San Rafael, 1 (CNHM).
VENEZUELA: Quebrada Seca, Sucre, 5 (AMNH, includes types of palmarius
and fulviventer); Neveri, Sucre, 3 (AMNH); San Rafaél, Sucre, 1 (CM); Rfo
Yurudn, Bolivar, 1 (AMNH); Auyan-tepui, Bolivar, 2 (AMNH, includes type
of auyanteput); Arabupu, Mt. Roraima, Bolivar, 2 (AMNH).
British Guiana: Kartabo, 4 (BM, type of guianae; AMNH, 3).
Oryzomys concolor superans Thomas
(Ecomys superans Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 8, vol. 8, p. 250, 1911; ser.
10, vol. 2, p. 261, 1928 (San Jerénimo, Peru, 1,000 feet altitude; palmeri Thomas,
a synonym).
Oryzomys (Oecomys) superans, Sanborn, Publ. Mus. Hist. Nat. ‘Javier Prado,”
ser. A, Zool., No. 6, p. 21, 1951 (Quincemil, Cuzco, Peru).
comys palmeri Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 8, vol. 8, p. 251, 1911 (type
locality, Canelos, Rfo Bobonaza, upper Rio Pastaza, Napo-Pastaza, eastern
Ecuador; altitude 2,100 feet).
Ccomys melleus Anthony, Amer. Mus. Nov., No. 139, p. 4, 1924 (type locality,
Zamora, Santiago-Zamora, eastern Ecuador, altitude 3,250 feet.—Goodwin,
Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 102, p. 302, 1953 (type history and measure-
ments).
(comys osgoodi Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 9, vol. 14, p. 287, 1924 (type
locality, Moyobamba, Amazonas, Peru; altitude about 820 meters above sea
level); ser. 9, vol. 19, p. 369, 1927 (Yurac Yacu, San Martin, Peru); ser. 9, vol.
20, p. 601, 1927 (Tingo Maria, Peru, 2,000 feet altitude; measurements).
Oecomys osgoodi, Laurie, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 12, vol. 8, p. 276, 1955 (Rio
Tigre, Ecuador, 2,000 feet altitude).
Oryzomys auriventer, J. A. Allen (not Thomas), Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol.
35, p. 118, 1916 (Zamora, Ecuador) [= type series of O. melleus Anthony].
Typre: Adult female, skin and skull (BM 11.7.19.12) collected
Apr. 28, 1910, by M. G. Palmer.
Type LocaLity: Canelos, Rio Bobonaza, Napo-Pastaza Province,
eastern Ecuador; altitude, 640 meters above sea level.
DistriBpuTION: Base, lower slopes, valleys, and foothills of the
Andes drained by the Amazon in Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru, from
approximately 200 to 1,200 meters above sea level.
CuHaractsers: Largest and darkest of the subspecies; upperparts
and sides tawny, the back evenly mixed or heavily lined with dark
brown; underparts gray to buff or ochraceous orange, the dark
plumbeous basal portions of the hairs showing through; throat and
chest not markedly different from belly.
MEASUREMENTS: See table 9.
VARIATION: Twenty-five specimens of superans taken during the
dry season (January-March) along the upper and middle Rio Caqueta
(Florencia; Mecaya; Tres Troncos) vary considerably inter se. A few
in prime pelage show either the dark color phase or the bright color
ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 557
phase on upperparts and sides. Most of the other specimens are in
old worn pelage of one color phase with patches of new pelage of the
other phase. Underparts range from ‘‘dirty gray,” sharply defined
from sides, to gray washed with buff on chest and belly and hardly or
not at all defined from sides.
The arboreal rice rats of the rain forests of eastern Ecuador vary
like the preceding but average darker, especially on the underparts.
Twenty-two adults and subadults at hand collected in February,
March, June, August, October, and November reveal no seasonal
molt pattern. One specimen collected in each of the months of
February, August and October is in old pelage. Others taken at the
same times and during other months of the year are in good to prime
pelage.
Specimens from higher altitudes in the valleys and slopes of the
Andes (Zamora and Chonta Urcu in Ecuador; Moyobamba, Amazonas,
and Hacienda Exito, Huanuco, in Peru) are smaller, have longer
pelage and are more richly colored, especially on underparts, than
their relatives from the base of the Cordillera.
REMARKS: Oryzomys concolor superans is the most distinctive race.
The transition in eastern Colombia from concolor of Orinoco drainage
to the larger darker superans of Amazonian drainage seems to be
abrupt. Likewise, the contrast between smaller white-bellied roberts
of northwestern Bolivia and swperans of southeastern Peru is sharp.
Oecomys palmeri Thomas is merely a small topotype of superans
collected the same day by the same collector. Four specimens from
Zamora, eastern Ecuador, first recorded by J. A. Allen as Oryzomys
aurwenter, were described as Oecomys melleus by Anthony. They
average slightly smaller with underparts more generally ochraceous
orange. Individually, however, they are indistinguishable from other
eastern Ecuadorian representatives of superans. The type of Oecomys
osgoodi Thomas is another small individual of superans. Its author
compared it with O. palmeri only. In 1927, Thomas (Ann. Mag.
Nat. Hist., ser. 10, vol. 2, p. 261) observed that palmeri was ‘not
really distinct from @. superans’’ and that the Peruvian ‘‘bush rat”
was also the same. He concluded that ‘‘throughout the tropical re-
gions of S. America almost every district has two members of this
genus—a large one, the size of a rat [=concolor], and a much smaller
one, that of a large mouse [=bicolor].”’
SPECIMENS EXAMINED: Sixty-three, from the following localities:
Cotomsia: Florencia, Caquetdé, 1 (CNHM); Tres Troncos, Rio Caquetd, Putu-
mayo, 7 (CNHM); Rio Mecaya, Rio Caquetdé, Putumayo, 17 (CNHM).
Ecuapor: Rio Napo, Napo-Pastaza, 1 (UMMZ); Llunchi, Rio Napo, Napo-
Pastaza, 1 (UMMZ); Chonta Urcu, Napo-Pastaza, 6 (MCZ, 4; CNHM, 2);
Canelos, Rio Bobonaza, Napo-Pastaza, 3 (BM, types of swperans and palmeri;
VOL. 110
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM
558
sé sg “$8 Lg 9:9
08 Le] 26 9°¢ U9
£8 ‘Se (ee Lg ‘g°¢ ‘gg 16 ‘9°8. ‘28 £°9 ‘e'9 ‘9°9 £'9 ‘3'9 ‘G9
Leos ag “Eg 18 ‘F'8 g'¢ “Bg T'9 ‘8°9
oe oe ae og =
oe ‘Te g'g ‘279 18 ‘28 6'g ‘o°9 0°9 ‘2'9
= vg = 09 as
ee ‘Te 9°¢ ‘0'9 16 ‘F'8 Lo ‘69 €°9 ‘g°9
OF E-TE)E'S | 9(6'S-9'9)8'9 | 9(L'6-2°8)Z'6 | 9(8°9-6'9)%'9 | $(6'9-6'9)E°9
e'€ ‘e's L'9 ‘F'9 0'6 ‘6'8 Z'9 ‘69 €'9 ‘8°¢
Bese SE T'9 ‘9°9 ‘g°¢ 16 ‘2°8 ‘8°8 19 ‘G9 ‘FG 9'9 ‘09 “6°e
ye ‘9° ‘SE | BE ‘B'S ‘2:9 [FOL ‘OOT‘T6| wz ‘2999 | SZ ‘OZ ‘g'9
oe 8g TOL Z9 GL
== 9° == a9 >
= a9 = £9 a9
TF 8'¢ 66 89 69
08 (6'-0'8)5"e 06(0°9-B"S)L°S |67(1OT-8°8) F'6 | 61 (8°9-1'S) T°9
81(8'2-9°9)8°9
AMOI Ivjour
TIP oyed-| jo qZueT elo SBI, CUIWILIOJ IPI
dI}eULOSAZ IB[OVATY OAISIOUT mIn14s0y
SST
O'8T
LSt ‘SLT ‘P81
LT ‘6'9T
9°9T
691 ‘TAT
SLT
TLT ‘6°21
G(0'0-F' LI) FST
LST ‘S°LT
O81 “2°21 “FLT
OGL ‘FIZ ‘0°61
F'61
OLT
L8t
88
A1(8°61-6'9T) 8°81
Qypvoiq
OI;VULOBAZ
“UOI{ALOsep [BUISIO ULOIJ ‘seuIOY,L, 2p00bso yo edA GZ, 5.
“TOLJALOsep PVUIZIIO WO’ ‘AMOTAUYW snazzaw Jo sdAy g
UOI4ALosep [BUISIIO Woy ‘svUIO,L, tawpod Jo adAy, 5
“MBO JDOUITM ¢
“HOT AiWosep [VUISIIO Wod ‘seMOyL, suosadns Jo odAY, g
“wADIOVY OY PUT ‘SOdTOLL SALT, ‘vloMelO[,] WOI suouMOeds y[Nps [[e sopnyauy ;
a a Se
T'98
o'FE
9°98 ‘6'FE ‘OFS
FES ‘HSE
ats
T'8 ‘8°
o°eé
6'FE ‘8'FE
G(hLE-9'FE)S9E
PLE ‘6'PE
OLE ‘“b'FE “O'ES
8'8E ‘8°28 ‘SLE
SLE
PEs
Sle
TL&
LI
LT
61 ‘OT ‘ST
61
§(0G-S1)81
02 ‘0Z
LY ‘OT‘L1
LI ‘02 ‘8T
ST
LI
ST
GI (6° LE-9°ZE) FE | LT (1-21) 81
qysuvey ©
4se.vels ‘TTnyS
IVT
6G 81 EST jopeiojogn Boog
8% . 091 Cel eyUBnYyeI]
08 ‘22 ‘6% | OLT ‘O9T ‘OST | TOT ‘EST ‘EFT cyedRoiey
= TSI iva edwmed eT
_ — — OUR
8 9S OFT 0ZT | 9 BQuIeqosOW
Awad
8% ‘6% OST ‘OST OFT ‘O8T BIOWCZ
8% OST OFT g BIOWIVZ,
0g ‘Ie O9T ‘O9T OFT ‘OFT | NOIQ BQUOTO
7(TE-6Z) 08 | S(GLI-SST)69L |9(S9I-SEI)FST | noex opurg
Tg ‘08 G8 ‘SLT SST ‘CT erenqided,
Ze ‘Te ‘0 | OBT ‘SOT ‘OLT | OST ‘291 ‘OFT TUIny cue R
8% ‘OE ‘OF | SBI ‘SST ‘89 | ZOT ‘ZLT ‘est OATCIUO TL
6% CLI COL sojousyp,
6 0S 9ST 181 SOTOUBD
21g 661 OST z SOTIULD
1 SLI EST Tqounyy
wodavaoyg
06 (GE-8Z) 08 191 (G8I-SST)VLT |67(QLI-IF1) 2ST 1 gjonbeo
VIE WOTTON
joo} pul Te Apoq A4L[ROO'T
pues pray .
‘aauy) UDY) a1oU Uayn ‘suamoeds fo saquin yy)
(saunbif oye fig payworpur
*s]npy fo (SLajawMyIwW UL) SJUaWaInsHapy sspwoy yz, suBIadNS Io[OOUOD SAWIOZAIQ— 6 ATAV IT,
ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 559
AMNH, 1); Montalvo, Rfo Bobonaza, Napo-Pastaza, 3 (CNHM); Rio Pindo
Yacu, Napo-Pastaza, 5 (CNHM); Yana Rumi, Napo-Pastaza, 3 (CNH M); Capa-
huari, Napo-Pastaza, 2 (CNHM); Zamora, Santiago-Zamora, 4 (AMNH, in-
cludes type of melleus).
Peru: Moyobamba, Amazonas, 1 (BM, type of osgoodt); Hacienda Exito, Rfo
Cayumba, Huanuco, 2 (CNHM); Satipo, Junin, 1 (MCZ); La Pampa, Puno,
1 (MCZ); Quineemil, Cuzco, 3 (CNHM); Itahuania, Madre de Dios, 1 (CNHM);:
Boca Colorado, Madre de Dios, 1 (CNHM).
Oryzomys concolor roberti Thomas
Rhipidomys roberti Thomas, Proc. Zool. Soc. London (1903), No. 2, p. 237, 1908.
[Oryzomys (icomys)] Roberti, Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 18, p.
445, 1906.
(E[comys] robertt, Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 8, vol. 3, p. 378, 1909
(comparison).
Oecomys robertt, Vieira, 1945, Arg. Zool. Sio Paulo, vol. 4, p. 428, 1945 (Fazenda
Aric’, Rio Aric&, Mato Grosso, Brazil).
Oryzomys (Gicomys) mamorae Thomas, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, vol. 18, p.
445, 1906 (type locality, ‘‘Mosetenes,” upper Rio Mamoré, Yungas, Cocha-
bamba, Bolivia).
(Ecomys mamorae, Osgood, Field Mus. Nat. Hist., zool. ser., vol. 10, p. 206, 1916
(Todos Santos, Rio Chaparé, Cochabamba, Bolivia).
Typ: Adult male, skin and skull (BM 3.7.7.67) collected July 6,
1902, by Alphonse Robert.
TypE Locauity: Santa Ana de Chapada, Mato Grosso, Brazil; alti-
tude, 800 meters above sea level.
Distrisution: Northern Bolivia in the departments of Beni,
Cochabamba, Santa Cruz, and Chuquisaca west into Mato Grosso,
Brazil, in the Rio Paraguay basin; altitudinal range approximately
200 to 1,500 meters above sea level.
CHARACTERS: Smaller and paler than superans; upperparts buffy
to tawny mixed with dark brown, underparts entirely white and
sharply defined from sides, or, sometimes, with a buffy or ochraceous
wash on chest and belly; skull with supraorbital ridges less developed
and divergent posteriorly than in other races.
M#ASUREMENTsS: See table 10.
VaRIATION: The type and two specimens at hand from Mato Grosso,
Brazil, are the palest representatives of the species east of the Andes.
Specimens from the Bolivian departments of Chuquisaca, Beni, and
Santa Cruz show a heavier mixture of dark brown on upperparts and
sides. Six specimens from Todos Santos, Rio Chaparé, collected by
R. H. Becker, average nearly as dark on upperparts as swperans.
The underparts, however, are pure white in two, more or less buffy
on belly and midline of chest in the others.
Remarks: The clear white or buffy underparts distinguish every
member of robertz from superans. On the other hand, subspecies
roberti is hardly separable from Amazonian concolor by its paler color,
VOL. 110
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM
560
UWOT}ATIOSOP [VUIS]IO WOY ‘svUIOY,L, aDsownw Jo OdAT, ¢
“‘q[Npseqns B JO osoy} O18 UOATS SJUIMIBINSvOUI 4SITT 9 ‘T4ZU0[ UMOIO ¢
“MBO INOUITM 5 “MOFJApIOSOp [VUTZ}IO WOT ‘seUION,L, #74ago4 JO OdAY, +
eee
oe Use| 62 v9 Lg = GE = ee =s eel eyonoyL,
Le ‘s'e ‘oe | 9g ‘Zo ‘og 0'6 ‘98 ‘T'8 L'9 ‘9°9 ‘8°9 99 ‘E'S ‘O'S | 2ST ‘LT ‘O'LT | E'be ‘E'Ee ‘O'ZE = 82 ‘6% ‘8% | OOT ‘SOT ‘OOT | OFT ‘O9T ‘Set eqsyAvuon g
ge ‘ee ‘OB | 9°9 ‘eo ‘eg 8°8 ‘9°8 ‘8°L 19 ‘8°¢ ‘2'¢ 09 ‘99 E'S | OLT ‘O'LT ‘6'ST FE ‘2°88 ‘PTE = 62 ‘8% ‘8% | FST ‘IST ‘OFT | GFT ‘LPT ‘eer 9 SOJUBS SOPOT,
=z cfg 98 L'g = LI o°§€ = + 22 TOT O&T ¢ S919}9S0 WY
VIATIOg
= t8y 08 o¢ = O'9T O'CE 9T L198 SPI OIT 1 epedeyo
T1zvugq
gaps MOI Ivjoul
aed Jo 442u9] vuloyseld BUrITAe1Oy qipiaM Weed 4439] eq | 300) pul Ley Apoq Az[e00'T
o1VeUl0ZAZ ie[OaaAT Vy QAISIOUT uInd4s0Y o1yeUI0ZAZ 4s0}e013 ‘[[NyYS pus pwoH
*(pajou asimaayjo sp ydaoxa) szjnpo fo (siajawrpjiwm UL) sjuawainsnayy :spUoyy, 1}19qQOI 1O]OOUOD sAWIOZAIQ—'OT WIAV,
ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 561
slightly larger size, and, more significantly, by its narrower supra-
orbital region and weaker temporal ridges.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED: Twenty-three, from the following localities:
Braziu: Santa Ana de Chapada, Mato Grosso, 1 (BM, the type of roberti);
Descalvados, Mato Grosso, 1 (CNHM); Urucum de Corumbdé, Mato Grosso, 1
(CNHM).
Bouivia: ‘‘Mosetenes,’’ Cochabamba, 1 (BM, type of mamorae); Todos Santos,
Cochabamba, 10 (AMNH, 5; CNHM, 5); Buenavista, Santa Cruz, 6 (CNHM, 5;
MACN, 1); Rio Yapacani, Santa Cruz, 1 (MACN); Marbdn, Rio Mamoré,
Santa Cruz, 1 (MACN); Ticucha, Rio Capirenda, Chuquisaca, 1 (CNHM).
Oryzomys concolor bahiensis, new subspecies
Mus cinnamomeus Pictet and Pictet, Notices sur les animaux nouveaux ou peu
connus du musée de Genéve, p. 64, pl. 19 (animal), pl. 238, fig. 5 (molars),
1844 (type locality, Bahia, Brazil; name preoccupied by Mus cinnamomeus
Lichtenstein, 1830, Darstellung neuer oder weniger bekannter Saugethiere,
Berlin, pl. 36, fig. 2 [==Proechimys myosuros Lichtenstein)).
Oecomys cinnamomeus, Moojen, Os roedores do Brasil, p. 53, 1952 (Ilhéus, Bahia,
Brazil).
Type: Adult male, skin and skull (CNHM 63780) collected
Sept. 19, 1944, by the Servico de Estudos e Pesquisas Sobre a Febre
Amarela; original number M 19330.
Typr LocaLity: Fazenda Almada, Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil.
DistrisuTion: Known only from eastern Bahia, Brazil, but
possibly ranges south into Minas Gerais and north and west into
the Rio Sao Francisco basin.
Cuaracters: Darker throughout than concolor; upperparts tawny,
underparts gray with a buffy wash, the slaty basal portions of the
hairs of belly, chest and limbs showing through; supraorbital region
broad, the ridges well developed and ledge-like.
Measurements: Of the type and paratype, respectively, as follows:
Head and body, 140, 130; tail, 145, 150; hind foot, dry with claw,
27, 28; weight, —, 57 grams; greatest length of skull, 33.0, 36.6;
zygomatic breadth, 18, 16.7; width of rostrum, 5.9, 6.0; nasals, 11.7,
11.5; incisive foramina, 6.0, 5.9; diastema, 8.0, 7.9; alveolar length of
molar row, 5.3, 5.3; zygomatic plate, 3.8, 3.4.
Measurements of the type of cinnamomeus Pictet and Pictet, given
in the original description, are as follows: head and body, 148; tail,
121; hind foot, 27.
Remarks: In the type, the upperparts are ochraceous tawny
mixed with the dark brown of the guard hairs; a faint ochraceous buff
lateral line is present; belly and underside of limbs gray, washed with
buff, the slaty basal portion of the hairs showing through; posterior
half of chest like belly, anterior portion and throat nearly pure white;
tail brown, upperside of metacarpus and metatarsus brownish, digits
silvery gray. A paratopotype is hardly distinguishable from the type.
504676—59—_~—-4
062 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
The present specimens agree closely with the original description
of Mus cinnamomeus. The colored plate of cinnamomeus, however,
shows. the wrist and adjoining part of the arms wholly white. This
condition is not only anomalous for Oecomys but is not in accord with
the text where it is stated that the anterior and outer sides of the fore-
limbs are colored like the dorsal surface of the head and body. The
name Mus cinnamomeus Pictet, 1844, is preoccupied by Mus cinna-
momeus Lichtenstein, 1830, a Proechimys.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED: Two, from Brazil: Almada, Ilhéus, Bahfa,
1, the type (CNHM); Urucutuca, Ilhéus, Bahia, 1 (CNHM).
GAZETTEER
(With Name of Collector and Name of Species)
Bouivia
Buenavista (400-500 m.), 17°27’ S.,
63°21’ W.
Rio Yapacani, Ichilo, Santa Cruz.
F. and J. Steinbach; Oryzomys
concolor.
Chimate (700 m.), 15° S., 68° W.
Upper Rio Beni, La Paz.
P.O. Simons; O. bicolor.
El Palmal (Palmal), 17°05’ S.,
65°23’ W.
Chaparé, Cochabamba.
F. Steinbach; O. bicolor.
Marban (240 m.)
Rio Mamoré, Beni.
F. Steinbach; O. bicolor, O. con-
color.
‘‘Mosetenes’”’ (probably a mis-
spelling)
Upper Rio Mamoré, Yungas,
Cochabamba.
L. Balzan; O. concolor.
Ticuche, (1,500. m.) 20°25! #85,
63°58! W.
Rio Capirenda, Chuquisaca.
J. Arduz Tardio; O. concolor.
Ticunhuaya (1,500 m.), 15°35’ S.,
68°10’ W.
iti La:Paz:
G. H. H. Tate; O. bicolor.
Todos Santos (250 m.), 16°40’ §.,
6b° 15" W.
On Rio Chaparé, Cochabamba.
R. H. Becker; O. concolor.
Bouivia—Continued
Yapacani, Rio
Same general collecting locality as
Buenavista, Santa Cruz (q.v.).
F. Steinbach; O. concolor.
BrRaAziIuL
Almada (Fazenda) (near sea level),
14°50’ S., 39° W.
Tihéus, Bahia.
Rockefeller Institution; O. con-
color.
Arica (Fazenda) (203 m.), 15°45’ S.,
55°46’ W.
Rio Aric’, Mato Grosso.
O. concolor.
Baraio de Melgaco (850 m.), 11°52’
S., 60°48’ W.
Rio Commemoracao, upper Rio
Gy-Parand, Mato Grosso.
L.. E. Miller; O. bicolor, O. :con-
© 2 color.
Descalvados (142 m.), 17°15’ S.,
57°48’ W.
Mato Grosso.
C. C. Sanborn; O. concolor.
Igarapé-agu (50 m.), 1°00’ S.,
47°35’ W.
Between Belém and Braganza,
Para.
A. Robert; O. bicolor.
Igarapé Bravo
Rio Tapajéz, Para.
A. M. Olalla; O. bicolor.
ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 563
Brazit—Continued
Ilha de Manapiri
Rio Tocantins, Pard.
M. Goeldi; O. concolor.
Jauaraté [Yauareté] (82 m.), 1°24’
N.; 69°12%W..
Rio Uaupés (left bank), Amazonas.
Olalla Bros.; O. concolor, O. bi-
color.
Jurué, Rio (150.m.), 6°45’ S.,
79° W.
Amazonas.
Garbe; O. bicolor.
Limontuba
Rio Tapajéz, Para.
A. M. Olalla; O. bicolor.
Manacapurt, 60°40’ W.
Rio Solimées, Amazonas.
O. concolor.
Marajé (Island)
At mouth of Rio Amazonas below
the Equator in Pard.
O. concolor.
Monte Alegre (10 m.), 2°00’ S.,
54°04’ W.
Rio Solimdes, east of Santarém,
Pard.
O. concolor.
Recreio, 3°30’ N., 61° W.
Rio Majary, Amazonas.
A. M. Olalla; O. bicolor.
Rosarinho (about 25 m.), 3°41’ S.,
59°07’ W.
Lago Miguel, Rio Madeira.
Olalla Bros., O. concolor.
Santa Ana de Chapada (855 m.),
12°25) Ss 50°25' W.
Mato Grosso.
A. Robert; O. concolor.
Santa Rosa, 5°20’ S., 55°30’ W.
Rio Jamanchim, Rio Tapajéz,
Pard.
E. Snethlage; O. concolor.
Tauary, 3°50’ S., 55°00’ W.
Rio Tapajéz, Pard.
A. M. Olalla; O. concolor.
Urucum de Corumb4, 19°00’ §&.,
57°40’ W.
Corumba, Mato Grosso.
C. C. Sanborn; O. concolor; O.
bicolor.
Brazit—Continued
Urucutuba (near sea level), 14°50’
S., 39°00’ W.
Iihéus, Bahfa.
Rockefeller Institution; O. con-
color.
Urup4, 10°50’ S., 61°35’ W.
Rio Urup4, a tributary of the
Parand, Mato Grosso.
L. E. Miller; O. bicolor.
Villa Braga, 4°20’ 8., 56°00’ W.
Rio Tapajéz, Pard.
O. concolor.
Yauanari, 0°30’ S., 64°50’ W.
Rio Negro, Amazonas.
Olalla Bros.; O. concolor.
BRITISH GUIANA
Barakara, 5°52’ S£ 57228" Wi
Canje River, 50 km. southeast
of New Amsterdam.
W. Beebe; O. bicolor.
Bartica (near sea level), 6°24’ N.,
58°36’ W.
At junction of Essequibo and
Mazaruni Rivers, Essequibo.
O. concolor.
Essequibo River (lower), 6°-7° N.,
58°35’ W.
S. B. Warren; O. bicolor.
Holmia, 4°55’ N., 55°35’ W.
Potaro Highlands.
M. A. de Freitas; O. bicolor.
Kartabo, 6°23’ N., 58°42’ W.
At junction of Mazaruni and
Cuyuni Rivers, Essequibo.
W. Beebe; O. bicolor, O. concolor.
Supinaam (River)
Demerara; enters mouth of Es-
sequibo (q.v.) from west.
O. concolor.
COLOMBIA
Andalucia (630 im.),
75°30’ W.
Huila.
L. E. Miller; O. bicolor.
Bonda (50-80 m.), 11°17’ N.,
74°02’ W.
Northwest slope of the Sierra
Nevada de Santa Marta,
Magdalena.
Mrs. H. H. Smith; O. concolor.
2°151S N.,
564
CoLtomB1a—Continued
Buena Vista (1,500 m.), 4°20’ N.,
73°40’ W.
Above Villavicencio, Meta.
Chapman, Cherrie, et al.; O.
concolor.
Catival (120 m.), 8°17’ N., 75°41’ W.
Upper Rio San Jorge drainage,
Cérdova.
P. Hershkovitz; O. concolor.
Conecepcién (La) (about 900 m.),
1TOL NS 23 265 W.
Rio San Antonio, northern slope
of Sierra Nevada de Santa
Marta, Magdalena.
W. W. Brown; O. concolor.
Donama. (600 mz), 11°13" N.;
74°00’ W.
Northwestern slope of Sierra
Nevada de Santa Marta, Mag-
dalena.
M. A. Carriker, Jr.; O. concolor.
Don Amo [= Donama (q.v.)]
Don Diego (sea level), 11°16’ N.,
73°37’ W.
Northern slope of the Sierra
Nevada de Santa Marta, Mag-
dalena.
M. A. Carriker, Jr., O. concolor.
El ‘Libano’ (1,250).m.), ‘11910 N..,
74°00’ W.
Northwestern slope of Sierra
Nevada de Santa Marta, Mag-
dalena.
H. H. Smith; O. concolor.
El Orinoco, 10°13’ N., 73°23’ W.
Rio Cesar, Magdalena.
P. Hershkovitz; O. concolor.
El Salado (480 m.), 10°22’ N.,
73°29’ W.
Southeastern slope of Sierra Ne-
vada de Santa Marta, Mag-
dalena.
P. Hershkovitz; O. concolor.
Florencia (450 m.), 1°45’ N., 75°40’
W.
Rio Orteguaza, Caqueta.
L. E. Miller; O. bicolor. P. Hersh-
kovitz; O. concolor.
Guaicaramo (about 250 m.), 4°35’
N., 73°00’ W.
Northeast of Villavicencio, Rfo
Upia, Meta.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
CotomBi1a—Continued
Hermano Nicéforo Marfa; O. con-
color. Gonzdlez; O. bicolor.
Jino Goje, 0°15’ S., 70°28’ W.
Rfo Apoporis, Amazonas.
I. Cabrera; O. bicolor.
Mamatoca (2 m.), 11°15’ N., 74°09’
W.
Three miles east of Santa Marta,
Magdalena.
H. H. Smith; O. concolor.
Mambita (700 m.), 4°46’ N., 73°20’
W.
Rio Guavio, eastern Cundina-
marca.
Gonzalez; O. concolor, O. bicolor.
Maipures (115 m.), 5°18’ N., 67°50’
W.
Rio Orinoco, Vichada.
G. K. and 8S. M. Cherrie; O. con-
color.
Las Marimondas (1,000 m.), 10°52’
N., 72°43" W.
Sierra de Perij4, Magdalena.
P. Hershkovitz; O. concolor.
Mecaya, Rio (185 m.), 0°29’ N.,
75°10! W.
Rio Caqueté, Putumayo.
P. Hershkovitz; O. bicolor, O.
concolor.
Medina, 4°30’ N., 72°45’ W.
East slope of Eastern Andes,
Cundinamarca.
Hermano Nicéforo Maria; O. con-
color.
Minca (660 m.), 11°12’ N., 74°04’
W.
Northwestern slope of Sierra Ne-
vada de Santa Marta, Magda-
lena.
H. H. Smith; O. concolor.
Muzo (1,000-1,300 m.), 5°30’ N.,
74°10’ W.
Western slope of the Cordillera
Oriental, Boyaca.
P. Hershkovitz; O. concolor.
Paime (1,038 m.), 5°25’ N., 74°10’
W.
Cundinamarea.
Hermano Nicéforo Maria; O. con-
color.
ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 565
CoLomB1a—Continued
Palomino (about 1,200 m.), 11°17’
N., 73°34’ W.
Northern slope of the Sierra Ne-
vada de Santa Marta, Mag-
dalena.
W. W. Brown; O. concolor.
Pueblo Bello (1,067 m.), 10°24’ N.,
73°43’ W.
Southern slope of the Sierra Ne-
vada de Santa Marta, Mag-
dalena.
P. Hershkovitz; O. concolor.
Pueblo Viejo (853 m.), 10°58’ N.,
73°26’ W.
Northern slope of the Sierra Ne-
vada de Santa Marta, Mag-
dalena.
W. W. Brown; O. concolor.
Purif (40 m.), 7°25" N.;°75°20' W.
Rio Cauca valley above Caceres,
Antioquia.
P. Hershkovitz; O. concolor.
San Antonio, 11°00’ N., 73°26’ W.
Rio San Antonio, northern slope
of the Sierra Nevada de Santa
Marta, Magdalena.
W. W. Brown; O. concolor.
Sierra Negra (1,265 m.), 10°36’ N.,
72°55’ W.
Western slope of the Sierra de
Perij4, Magdalena.
P. Hershkovitz; O. concolor.
Socorré (100-150 m.), 7°51’ N.
NGoOlLi W.
Rio Sind, Cérdova.
P. Hershkovitz; O. concolor.
Tres Troncos (150 m.), 0°05’ N.,
CELT W:
Right bank, Rfo Caquetd, La
Tagua, Putumayo.
P. Hershkovitz; O. concolor, O.
bicolor.
Villanueva (274 m.), 10°37’ N.,
72°58’ W.
Rio Cesar Valley, Magdalena.
P. Hershkovitz; O. concolor.
Villavicencio (498 m.), 4°10’ N.,
73°40’ W.
Meta.
G. M. O’Connell; O. concolor.
a
Costa Rica
Boruca (500 m.), 9°04’ N., 83°27’ W.
Puntarenas.
M. A. Carriker, Jr.; O. concolor.
El General (625 m.), 9°21’ N.,
83°40’ W.
Puntarenas.
A. Smith; O. concolor.
San Gerénimo (about 150 m.),
9°39’ N., 84°18’ W.
Rfo Pirris, San José.
C. F. Underwood; O. concolor.
EcuapDoR
Avila (600 m.), 0°38’ S., 77°25’ W.
Rio Suno, Napo-Pastaza.
E. J. Brundage; O. bicolor.
Canelos (530 m.), 1°35’ 8., 77°45’ W.
Rio Bobonaza, Napo-Pastaza.
G. H. H. Tate; O. bicolor. M.G.
Palmer; O. concolor.
Capahuari, Rfo (300 m.), 1°55’ S.,
77°20’ W.
A tributary of the Rio Pastaza,
Napo-Pastaza.
R. Olalla; O. concolor.
Chonta Ureu (700 m.)
Upper Rio Napo, Napo-Pastaza.
W. Clark-MacIntyre; O. concolor.
Chonta Urcu, east (500 m.)
Napo-Pastaza.
C. Olalla; O. concolor.
Copataza, Rfo (650 m.), 1°45’ S.,
77°50’ W.
Enters Rio Pastaza, Napo-Pa-
staza.
M. Olalla; O. bicolor.
Gualaquiza (885 m.), 4°22’ N.,
78°32! W.
Rfo Gualaquiza, Santiago-Za-
mora.
O. bicolor.
Jatun Yacu, Rfo (700 m.), 1°04’ S.,
00°47" We
Rio Napo, mouth at Puerto Napo.
W. Clark-MaclIntyre; O. bicolor.
Jollin, Rio (700 m.), 0°45’ S., 77°40’
W.
Enters the Misagualli east of
Tena.
W. Clark-MacIntyre; O. bicolor.
566 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Ecuapor—Continued
Llunchi (250 m.), 0°37’ S., 76°46’ W.
Rio Napo, Napo-Pastaza.
P. Hershkovitz; O. concolor, O.
bicolor.
Montalvo, 1°40’ S., 77°20’ W.
Rio Bobonaza, Napo-Pastaza.
R. Olalla; O. bicolor, O. concolor.
Napo, Rio
Napo-Pastaza
L. Séderstrém; O. concolor.
Pambilar (20 m.), 1° N., 79° W.
Esmeraldas,
G. Fleming; O. bicolor.
Paramba (1,100 m.), 0°49’ N.,
78°22’ W.
Rio Mira, Imbabura.
R. Miketta; O. bicolor.
Pindo Yacu [Pinto Yacu] (250 m.),
2°33) Si 6AS8 OW:
Rio Bobonaza near junction with
Rio Pastaza.
R. Olalla; O. concolor.
San José (below) (500 m.), 0°32’ S.,
77°26’ W.
Rio Payamino, Napo-Pastaza.
Olalla Bros.; O. bicolor.
Suno, Rfo (below), 0°40’ S., 77°08’
W.
Enters Rio Napo, Napo-Pastaza.
Olalla Bros.; O. bicolor.
Yana Rumi
Napo-Pastaza.
R. Olalla; O. concolor.
Zamora (1,000 m.), 4°10’ S., 78°43’
W.
Rio Zamora, Santiago-Zamora.
H. E. Anthony; O. bicolor. W. B.
Richardson; O. concolor.
PANAMA
Barro Colorado, Canal Zone.
R. K. Enders; O. concolor, O.
bicolor.
Bogava [Bugaba (q.v.)]
Bugaba (250 m.), 8°28’ N., 83°38’
W.
Pacific coast, Chiriqui.
H. J. Watson; O. concolor.
Cana [Santa Cruz de Cana] (600 m.),
7°43’ N., 77°40’ W.
Darién.
E. A. Goldman; O. concolor.
PansMa—Continued
Corozal, Canal Zone.
O. concolor.
Jesusito, Rio (near sea _ level),
8°03’ N., 78°14’ W.
A tributary of the Sambu,
Darién.
T. Barbour and W. 8. Brooks;
O. bicolor.
Tacareuna (560-600 m.), 8°05’ N.,
77°20’ W.
Darién.
H. E. Anthony; O. concolor.
PERU
Boca Colorado (279 m.), 12°30’ S.,
70°25’ W.
Madre de Dios.
C. Kalinowski; O. concolor.
Camante (2,000 m.), 13°30’ S.,
70°50’ W.
Near Cadena, Marcapata, Cuzco.
C. Kalinowski; O. bicolor.
Chanchamayo (1,000 m.), 11°10’ S.,
75°20’ .W.
Junin.
J. M. Schunke; O. bicolor.
Curaray, Rfo (mouth) (140 m.),
2°26’ S., 74°04’ W.
Loreto.
Olalla Bros.; O. bicolor.
Exito (Hacienda) (940 m.), 9°25’ 8.
Rio Cayumba, Huanuco; the
Cayumba enters the Huallaga.
E. Heller; O. concolor.
Itahuania, 12°40’ S., 71°10’ W.
Madre de Dios.
C. Kalinowski; O. concolor.
Lagarto Alto, 5°55’ S., 74°35’ W.
Rio Ucayali, Loreto; the coordi-
nates are those of ‘‘Lagarto,’’
which may not be the actual
collecting locality.
Olalla Bros.; O. bicolor.
La Pampa (573 m.), 13°38’ S.,
69°36’ W.
On road between Limbani and
Astilleros, Puno.
O. Pearson; O. concolor.
Mazdn, Rio (100 m.), 3°20’ &.,
73°05’ W.
Tributary of Rio Napo, Loreto.
Mendo B.; O. bicolor.
ARBOREAL RICE RATS—HERSHKOVITZ 567
PEeru—Continued
Monte Alegre
Presumably in Loreto Depart-
ment.
G. Tessman; O. bicolor.
Moyobamba (820 m.), 6°03’ S.,
76°58’ W.
At head of Rfo Moyobamba,
Amazonas.
L. Rutter; O. concolor.
Pozuzo, 9°55''S.; 75°35! W.
Huanuco.
E. Heller; O. bicolor.
Pucallpa (180 m.), 8°25’ S., 74°35’
W.
Loreto.
J. M. Schunke; O. bicolor.
Puerto Indiana (100 m.), 3°20’ &S.,
72°40’ W.
North bank of Rio Marajion,
above mouth of Rio Napo,
Loreto.
Olalla Bros.; O. bicolor.
Quincemil (680 m.), 13°17’ S.,
70°35’ W.
Rio Marcapata, Cuzco.
C. Kalinowski; O. concolor, O.
bicolor.
Sagrario (1,020 m.),
69°41’ W.
Upper Rio Inambari, Puno.
P. O. Simons; O. bicolor.
San Jerénimo (300 m.), 7°45’ S.,
74°50’ W.
Rio Ucayali, Loreto.
R. W. Hendee; O. concolor, O.
bicolor.
Santiago, Rio
J. M. Schunke; O. bicolor.
Sarayacu, 6°45’ S., 75°15’ W.
Rio Ucayali, Loreto.
Olalla Bros.; O. bicolor.
Satipo, 11°12’ S., 74°32’ W.
Junin.
O. Pearson; O. concolor.
and Gardner; O. bicolor.
Tambo Yacu (1,000 m.), 6°00’ S.,
1°10) We
Rioja, San Martfn.
Osgood and Anderson; O. bicolor.
Tingo Marfa (700 m.), 9°10’ &.,
75°45’ W.
Rio Huallaga, Huanuco.
R. W. Hendee; O. concolor.
13°55! S.,
Pearson
PreRu—Continued
Villa Carmen (Hacienda) (600 m.),
12°52’ S., 71°15’ W.
Cosiiipata, Cusco.
C. Kalinowski; O. bicolor.
Yarinacocha (160 m.), 10°15’ S.,
74°45’ W.
Rio Ucayali, Loreto.
J. M. Schunke; O. bicolor.
Yurac Yacu (800 m.), 6° S., 77° W.
San Martin.
R. W. Hendee; O. concolor, O
bicolor.
TRINIDAD
Caparo
Caroni, Port of Spain.
F. M. Chapman; O. concolor.
Caura
Caroni.
F. M. Chapman; O. concolor.
Cumaca
W. G. Downs; O. concolor.
Mayaro, 10°20’ N., 61°00’ W.
Southeastern Trinidad.
O. concolor.
Prince’s Town, 10°16’ N., 61°22’ W.
Victoria.
F. M. Chapman; O. concolor.
San Rafael, 10°30’ N., 61°15’ W.
F. Wonder; O. concolor.
St. Pats
W. G. Downs; O. concolor.
VENEZUELA
Agiita (1,000 m.), 3°22’ N., 65°
35’ W.
Southeast slope of Mt. Duida,
Amazonas.
G. H. H. Tate; O. concolor.
Arabupu:’ (280) +m-)}'' 5°03" N..,
60°39’ W.
South side of Mt. Roraima,
Bolivar.
G. H. H. Tate and T. D. Carter;
O. concolor.
Auyantepuf (1,100 m.), 5°45’ N.,
62°30’ W.
East of Rio Caroni, Bolfvar.
G. H. H. Tate; O. concolor.
Caicara’ (146° m.), 7°38’ N.; 66°
10’ W.
Right bank
Bolivar.
G. K. Cherrie; O.’concolor.
of Rio Orinoco,
568
VENEZUELA—Continued
Cafio. Seco\,.(700', m:),., 3221’ “N.,
65°35’ W.
Southeast slope of Mt. Duida,
Amazonas.
Olalla Bros.; O. bicolor.
Caroni, Rfo (1,100 m.), 6°00’ N..,
62°45’ W.
Cerro Auyantepuf, Bolfvar.
G. H. H. Tate; O. concolor.
Casiquiare, Rfo (80 m.), 2°48’ N.,
65°55’ W.
Two miles west of Raudal Yamadd,
Amazonas.
G. H. H. Tate, Olalla Bros.;
O. concolor.
Chama (Cafetos de) (1,600 m.),
8°33! N., 71°13" W..
Rio Chama, Mérida.
S. Bricefio; O. concolor.
Cogollo, Rio (100 m.), 9°55’ N.,
72°12’ W.
Zulia, Perija.
W. H. Osgood and H. B. Conover;
O. concolor.
El Llagual [Yagual], 7°12’ N.,
64°58’ W.
Lower Rio Caura, Bolivar.
M. A. Carriker, Jr.; O. concolor.
El Merey, 3°06’ N., 65°53’ W.
Rio Casiquiare, Amazonas.
Olalla Bros.; O. concolor.
Esmeralda (143 m.), 3°11’ N.,
65°33’ W.
Mt. Duida, north bank of upper
Orinoco.
G. H. H.. Tate, Olalla Bros.;
O. concolor.
Thuapo, 7°00’ N., 65°27’ W.
Rio Orinoco, Amazonas.
Olalla Bros.; O. concolor.
La. Azulita (1,135 m.), 8°43’ N.,
71°26" W.
Mérida.
W. H. Osgood and H. B. Con-
over; O. concolor.
La Uni6én (150 m:);),7°05’ N.,
65°52’ W.
Rio Caura, Bolfvar.
S. M. Klages; O. bicolor.
Los Palmales, 10°30’ N., 64°10’ W.
East of Cuman4, Sucre.
F. M. Urich; O. concolor.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 11¢
VENEZUELA—Continued
Lourdes (Cafetos de) (1,800 m.),
SoSSUAING, (Ml 20M, awe
Mérida.
S. Bricefio; O. concolor.
Mérida (1,641 m.), 8°36’ N., 71°09’
W.
Mérida.
O. concolor.
Mérida (Cafetos de) (1,630 m.),
8$°36/Ni 71°09" We
Mérida.
S. Bricefio; O. concolor.
Milla (Cafetos de) (1,630 m.),
8°43" N;, 2°00" Wi:
Mérida.
S. Bricefio; O. concolor.
Milla (Montes de) (1,630-1,670 m.),
SP43"" Nua wl, We
Mérida.
S. Bricefio; O. concolor.
Montes de la Otra Banda (1,600-
1,630 m.), 8°37’ N., 71°10’ W.
Mérida, Mérida.
S. Briceiio; O. concolor.
Neveri (750 m.), 10°06’ N., 64°37’
W.
Sucre.
G. H. H. Tate and H. J. Clement;
O. concolor.
Ocama, Rfo (150 m.), 2°47’ N.,
65°15’ W.
At mouth of Rfo Orinoco, Ama-
zonas.
Olalla Bros.; O. concolor.
Quebrada Seca, 10°15’ N., 63°55’
W.
Rio Manzanares, Cumanacoa,
Sucre.
F. W. Urich; O. concolor.
Rancho Grande (1,100 m.), 10°21’
N., 67°41’ W.
Aragua.
G. H. H. Tate and W. Beebe;
O. bicolor.
San Rafael (900 m.), 10°05’ N.,
64° W.
Cumanacoa, Sucre.
H. J. Clement; O. concolor.
Yurudn, Rfo, 6°42’ N., 61°37’ W.
Bolivar.
M. A. Carriker, Jr.; O. concolor
O. bicolor.
PROC U.S. NAT. MUS. VOL. 110 HERSHKOVITZ, PLATE 1
palusiris
)
(Oryzon ys
OP
—~ &
& 28
EOC
Symes
a Z,
S$ 3
~
mS
~~ c=)
14); b,
84
R} ip 1d0 mys
=,
3
a,
) } 7 olor (CNHM
(CNHM 48455);
omys (Oecomy.
Ory
a,
| yy rsal
PROC. U.S. NAT. MUS. VOL. 110 HERSHKOVITZ, PLATE 2
a, Oryzomys bicolor; b, O. concolor; c, O. palustris; d, Rhipidomys venustus.
<2) of same skulls shown in plate I:
Ventral aspect (
PROG. US. NAT. MUS: VOL. 110 HERSHKOVITZ, PLATE 3
Lateral aspect (2) of same skulls (with mandibles) shown in plates 1, 2: a, Orvzomys
bicolor; b, O. concolor; c, O. palustris: d, Rhipidomys venustus.
t B
PROC. U.S. NAT. MUS. VOL. 110 HERSHKOVITZ, PLATE 4
Upper and lower molars (10) of same specimens (except as noted) shown in plate 3: a,
Oryzomys bicolor (CNHM 18541); 6, O. conc olor; c, O. palustris; d, Rhipidomys venustus.
PROC. U.S. NAT. MUS. VOL. 110 HERSHKOVITZ, PLAMTE 5
Dorsal aspect (1-++) of skull in certain subspecies of Oryzomys concolor (a-e) and O. bicolor
(f-7), showing variation in size with broad overlapping in the opposite extremes of each
species. d-c, Oryzomys concolor superans: a, Male (CNHM 41459), Montalvo, Rio
Bobonaza, Ecuador; b, female (CNHM 43257), Rio Pindo Yacu, Ecuador; c, female
(CNHM 43252), Yana Rumi, Ecuador. d, e, Oryzomys concolor concolor: d, male (USNM
280563), Pueblo Bello, Colombia; ¢, female (USNM 280583), El Orinoco, Rio Cesar,
Colombia. f, g, 1, Oryzomys bicolor bicolor, males: f (CNHM 18541), Holmia, British
Guiana; g (UMMZ 80162), 7 (UMMZ 80147), both from Llunchi, Rio Napo, Ecuador.
h, J, Oryzomys bicolor phaeotis: h, Female (CNHM 84314), Villa Carmen, Cosnipata, Peru;
j, male (CNHM 68638), Camante, Marcapata, Peru.
PROC. U.S. NAT. MUS. VOL. 110 HERSHKOVITZ, PLATE 6
Ventral aspect of (1-++) same skulls in same order as shown in plate 5: Oryzomys concolor
(a-e) and O. bicolor (7 Hh
PROC. U.S. NAT. MUS. VOL. 110 HERSHKOVITZ, PLATE 7
Dorsal and ventral aspect of skull (2) of: a, Oryzomys bicolor (CNHM 84314); 5, O. lon
icaudatus (CNHM 24593),
HERSHKOVITZ, PLATE 8
110
U.S. NAT. MUS. VOLE
PROC
INHNO)
5 NJOIYIUDX ‘O ye!)
aK
IPTST INHNO) Snevyqns ‘O°
‘
=(
‘(90648 INHNO) £42240] ‘O ‘2 *(9SF61
ZS7EF INHINO) 40702"02 0 “4 *(HIEF8 INHNO) 4079209 Shmozhsg ‘D :(Z
) [[nys Fo qoodse
[estoqd
PROG. USS NAT. MUS. VOL. 110 HERSHKOVITZ, PLATE 9
laticep
O
]
YANTNEOLUS; @,
(OR
as
subflavus;
(Oy
h
Oryzom AVA) bicolor:
(
) of same skulls shown in plate 8:
4
{
aspect
Ventral
PROC. U.S. NAT. MUS. VOL. 110 HERSHKOVITZ, PLATE 10
Lateral aspect (2) of same skulls shown in plates 8, 9: a, Oryzomys bicolor; b, O. concolor;
I i : 3
c, O. subflavus; d, O. xantheolus; e, O. laticeps.
PROG. WS. .NAdTIMUS. VOL. 110 HERSHKOVITZ, PLATE 11
Lateral aspect (2) of left mandibles of same skulls shown in plates 8-10: a, Oryzom
,O. subflavus; d, O. xantheolus;
bicolor; b, O. concolor; ¢
PROC. US. NAT. MUS. VOL 110 HERSHKOVITZ, REAGE 12
Upper and lower molars (>< 10) of same specimens shown in plates 8-11: a, Oryzomys bi-
olor; b, O. concolor; c, O. subflavus; d, O. xantheolus; e, O. laticeps.
PROCEEDINGS OF .THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
U.S. NATIONAL MUSEUM
Vol. 110 Washington: 1959 No. 3421
THE RODENT-INFESTING ANOPLURA (SUCKING LICE) OF
THAILAND, WITH REMARKS ON SOME RELATED SPECIES
By Puy.us T. Jounson '
During 1952-55, Robert E. Elbel, Malaria Control Adviser in the
North Eastern Provinces, conducted wild-mammal- and_ bird-ecto-
parasite surveys for the U.S. Operations Missions to Thailand,
International Cooperation Administration. This first such compre-
hensive survey in Thailand has proved to be a major contribution to
mammalogy, ornithology, and entomology. Mr. Elbel’s collections
are the result of one of the first wholehearted attempts to sample
populations of a large and representative percentage of the rodent and
rodent-ectoparasite species native to Southern Asia, and have therefore
provided medical entomology with valuable and unique information
on this area of the world.
The present paper is an account of the Anoplura collected by Mr.
Elbel and his associates, and of a collection made by D. C. and
EK. B. Thurman in northeastern Thailand. Of the 18 species repre-
sented, 8 are new.?. To date only 4 species of ‘Anoplura have been
recorded from Thailand. Of these 4, only 1 was not included in
Mr. Elbel’s collections (Hoplopleura pectinata Cummings from Fattus
surifer, Trong, Lower Thailand).
1 Entomology Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
2 One of the new species collected during the survey will be described in another paper, and is not men-
tioned here.
569
570 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
I am indebted to Mr. Elbel for submitting the Thai Anoplura
collection for study and deposit in the collections of the U.S. National
Museum. Ernestine B. Thurman and the late D. C. Thurman, Jr.,
kindly donated their collections of Thai Anoplura, which have served
as a valuable supplement to Mr. Elbel’s collections.
As dictated by the distribution of its hosts, the Thai anopluran
fauna is mainly attributable to the Oriental Region, but contains
elements from the Palaearctic and Australian Regions as well. One
of the species, Polyplax spinulosa (Burmeister), has a cosmopolitan
distribution on Rattus species.
Probably at least half the species of rodent-infesting Anoplura in
Thailand have now been collected. ‘The Anoplura of the primates
and ungulates in Thailand remain completely unknown, and those
from all the surrounding areas are very poorly known.
The description of a new species of Neohaematopinus taken from a
flying squirrel from Borneo is included in this paper because this
species is very closely allied to one taken from Thai flying squirrels.
I am indebted to Lt. Col. Robert Traub, M.S.C., U.S. Army, for
donating the specimens from Borneo.
David H. Johnson, curator of mammals, U.S. National Museum,
determined the hosts reported in this paper. Skins and skulls of
these mammals are in the collections of the Division of Mammals.
I wish to thank Dr. Johnson for his very necessary and helpful coop-
eration.
Unless otherwise indicated, all the specimens reported are from
Thailand. If there are only two elements in a locality name, they
represent the province and the village (Ban) or mountain. If three
or more elements are included, they represent the province, the district
(Muang), and the village or subvillage or mountain. Provincial
names are given in small capital letters. Transliteration of the names
follows the U.S. Army Gazetteer for Thailand (1944) with emenda-
tions by H. G. Deignan.
Collector’s names (Elbel and his associates) have been omitted
except in data pertaining to the holotype of each of the new species.
Individuals and organizations who cooperated with Mr. Elbel in
obtaining the material were: Boonsong Lekagul and H. G. Deignan;
and the Banpong Plague Laboratory, the Khorat Plague Laboratory,
and the Nakhon Sawan Plague Laboratory.
Enderleinellus corrugatus, new species
Figures 1-5
Typr pata: Holotype male from Tamiops macclellandi, cHAIYA-
PHUM: Phukhieo, Ban Kaeng, Ban Lat, January 16, 1952, RE-355,
ANOPLURA OF THAILAND—JOHNSON 571
= lala
An t \ >
Toa.
———
UD ..
pe —t
= x :
SS
eae
f
Ey
=
Figures 1—5.—Enderleinellus corrugatus, new species: 1, Paratype 2; 2, Holotype &; 3,
Genitalia, holotype o&; 4, Paratergal plates II-VI, paratype 2 ; 5, Thoracic sternal plate,
holotype oc’.
R. E. Elbel, collector. One paratype female from Tamiops mac-
clellandi, cHIENGMAI: Chiengmai, Ban Den, February 6, 1952,
D. C. and E. B. Thurman collectors.
Holotype deposited in the collections of the U.S. National Museum,
type-catalog No. 64381.
Diaenosis: FE. corrugatus is close to FE. malaysianus Ferris and
E.. dremomydis Ferris. The thoracic sternal plate and male genitalia
are much like those of malaysianus. It is easily distinguished from
malaysianus in that paratergal plates II-V are heavily ridged and
the spiracles are not particularly enlarged. FE. corrugatus has the
head almost as broad as long but not noticeably longer, and has
spiracles on abdominal segments 3-8, not 3-5 as does malaysianus.
In corrugatus, large distinct paratergal plates are present on segments
2-5, a very small plate is present on segment 6, and areas of sclerotiza-
tion occur around the spiracles on segments 7 and 8. FE. malaysianus
completely lacks plates on segments 6-8. LF. corrugatus is distinct
from EF. dremomydis, which has paratergal plates on segments 2-6,
in that dremomydis lacks rugosities on these plates, has the plates
differently shaped, and has different setation.
ie PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Description: Male: Head almost as broad as long; with marked
postantennal angles; lateral margins slightly convergent posteriorly;
broadly rounded anteriorly; venter very scaly; rostrum opening
ventrally; antennae set well back from anterior head margin; seg-
ments of antennae distinct and as broad or broader than long. Thorax
about as long as head; sternal plate oval, heavily sclerotized laterally.
Legs with first and second pairs with well-developed tarsal thumb
opposing claw; coxae of first and third pairs noticeably rugose.
Abdomen with medium-sized spiracles on segments 3-8; large par-
atergal plates on segments 2-5; a very small plate on segment 6;
small sclerotizations around spiracles of segments 7 and 8. Par-
atergal plate II with one apical seta; plate III with two setae about
half length of plate; plate IV with one seta somewhat shorter than
plate and one minute seta; plate V with one short and one minute
seta; plate VI with two minute setae. Dorsally with one row of
setae per segment, a narrow plate associated with each row; setae
on segments 4-7 large and inflated, these rows continuous across
dorsum and containing 10, 11, 12, and 8 setae, respectively. Ventrally
with plates associated with rows of setae on segments 2 and 3 only;
setae of segments 3-6 inflated. Genitalia having basal plate with
posterior arms about as long as undivided anterior part; endomeral
piece broadly U-shaped, with median fracture; pseudopenis elongate-
triangular, posterior part lacking rugosities.
Female: Head, thorax, and legs asin male. Abdomen with para-
tergal plates as in male. Veuntrally, plates associated with rows of
setae on segments 2 and 3 only; segments 3-7 with setae inflated;
6 setae in rows on segments 3 and 4; 9-11 setae in rows on segments
5-6; segment 7 lacking setae medially, with 2 setae laterally on
each side. Dorsally, plates associated with anterior 4 rows of setae;
setae of segments 4-8 inflated ; rows on segments 5-7 containing 11-14
setae, extending completely across dorsum. Genitalia as in figure 1,
Lengths: Male 0.58 mm.; female 0.71 mm.
Enderleinellus dremomydis Ferris
Enderleinellus dremomydis Ferris, Contributions toward a monograph of the
sucking lice, pt. 1 (1919), p. 29, fig. 16, 1920; The sucking lice, p. 108,
1951.
This species was described from two females found on Dremomys
pernyi, West Szechuan, China.
New reEcorpD: One female from Dremomys rufigenis, Lornt: Dan
Sai, Kok Sathon, Phak Khi Nak Mountain, March 29, 1955, RE-5189.
This Thai record is the first since the original description. The
specimen agrees well with the original description and the female
paratype in the U.S. National Museum collections. The male of
dremomydis remains unknown.
ANOPLURA OF THAILAND—JOHNSON 573
Enderleinellus kumadai Kaneko
FicuREs 6-9
Enderleinellus kumadai Kaneko, Bull. Tokyo Medical and Dental Univ., No. 1,
p. 49, figs. 1, 1-8, and 2, 1-2, 1954.
Kaneko described this species from the holotype male, allotype
female, and four male and seven female paratypes, collected from
Callosciurus erythraeus thaiwanensis, O-shima, Tokyo, Japan. ‘The
host squirrels are native to Formosa and had escaped from a zoo
during World War II to become established on O-shima.
New recorps: Three males, one female from Callosciurus sp.,
NAKHON SAWAN: Bon Phot Phisai, Tha Ngiu, March 30, 1953, RE-
1740. Two females, same data, but RE-1741. One male, one
female, same data, but RE-1743. One female from Callosciurus
finlaysoni, CHATYAPHUM: Phukeio, Ban Kaeng, Ban Non Taolek,
January 16, 1952, RE-361.
The specimens reported above agree quite well with Kaneko’s
original description and figures. HE. kumadai is related to EL. malay-
sianus Ferris, LE. menetensis Ferris, and: /. larisci Ferris—all from
Asian squirrels; it may be separated from malaysianus in having
paratergal plates on segments 2-4 (2-5 in malaysianus) ; and it differs
Ficures 6-9.—Enderleinellus kumadai: 6, Genitalia, @'; 7, 9 ; 8, Thoracic sternal plate, o;
9, Paratergal plates, o’.
574 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
from menetenis, which also has three paratergal plates, in that spiracles
are located on segments 3-5, not 3-6 (or 3-8), and the thoracic
sternal plate has the sclerotized portion dumbbell-shaped in kumadai
rather than entire, and in that the apical setae of paratergal plate
ILI are longer than the plate in kumadai. FE. kumadai is closest to
LE. larisci but is easily separated as follows: LE. larisci lacks definite
postantennal angles on the head and has no apical setae on para-
tergal plates IT and IV. E. kumadai has one apical seta on plate
II and two on plate IV. In male larisci the endomeres are broadly
separated and the pseudopenis very small, whereas kumadai has
the endomeres joined medially (although a fracture line is visible
in some specimens), and the pseudopenis is large and as long as the
parameres.
The Thai specimens of kumadai were compared with two male and
two female paratypes in the collection of Captain John E. Scanlon.
Enderieinellus malaysianus Ferris
Enderleinellus malaysianus Ferris, Contributions toward a monograph of the
sucking lice, pt. 1 (1919), p. 12, figs. 3-4, 1920; The sucking lice, p. 110,
1951.—Werneck, Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 45, pp. 281, 302, 1947.
Ferris described malaysianus from material collected off Calloscwurus
caniceps and Callosciurus prevosti from Malaya, Lower Siam, and
Borneo. The holotype is from C. caniceps, St. Lukes Island, Mergui
Archipelago, Malaysia.
New reEcorD: One female from Callosciurus caniceps, NAKHON
SsAWAN: Pak Nom Pho, Khao Khat, May 4, 1953, RE-2503.
This female has spiracles considerably smaller than the holotype
and paratypes in the U.S. National Museum, but agrees well in other
respects.
Enderleineflus menetensis Ferris
Enderleinellus menetensis Ferris, Contributions toward a monograph of the
sucking lice, pt. 1 (1919), p. 14, figs. 5-6, 1920; The sucking lice, p. 110,
1951.—Werneck, Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 45, p. 281, 1947.
Ferris described FE. menetensis from a series of males and females
taken from Menetes berdmorei rufescens, Koh Kut Island, Southeast
‘Siam. The holotype is a male.
New record: One male, one female from Menetes berdmorei,
KANCHANABURI: Latya, May 17, 1952, F—752.
These specimens agree well with the original description and figures
except that both sexes have more numerous setae on the abdomen
dorsaily and ventrally, chiefly by reason of having three to five setae
in each lateral group rather than one or two. Spiracles are present
on abdominal segments 3-8 in the present specimens. The spiracles
are very small and hard to see unless the specimen is in a favorable
ANOPLURA OF THAILAND—JOHNSON 575
position. The paratype female in the U.S. National Museum col-
lections has apparent spiracles only on segments 3-6. It is possible
that this species has a variable number of spiracles.
Hoplopleura malabarica Werneck
Fiacures 12-14, 16
Hoplopleura malabarica Werneck, Rev. Brasileira Biol., vol. 14, No. 1, p. 113,
figs. 8-12, 1954.
Werneck’s type series consisted of the male holotype, female
allotype, and one male and four female paratypes from Bandicota
malabarica Shaw, Colombo, Ceylon, July 28, 1944, collected by C. D.
Radford.
New recorps: Many specimens in 27 collections from Bandicota
sp., Bandicota bengalensis ssp., and Bandicota indica ssp. from the
following localities: cHatyApHUM: Phukhieo, Ban Kaeng, Ban Lat.
KANCHANABURI: Tamaka, Luk Kae; Tamaka, Tharua; Latya, Ban
Nua; Bo Phloi; and Kanchanaburi District. Loppurt: Khao Oerawan
Mt. NAKHON SAWAN: Pak Nam Pho, Khao Khat Mt. rar Burt:
Banpong, Pakraet; Banpong, Boekphrai; and Paktho, Phuchik.
H. malabarica is a parasite of Bandicota species, and although
Rattus species may be found in similar ecological situations together
with Bandicota, in only one instance did Elbel collect malabarica
from Rattus.
Ficures 10-16.—Hoplopleura malabarica and H. hirsuta: 10, Paratergal plates, H. hirsuta,
2 ; 11, Same, o; 12, Same, H. malabarica, 2 ; 13, Same, &; 14, Thoracic sternal plate, H.
malabarica, &; 15, Genitalia, H. hirsuta, &; 16, Same, H. malabarica, &.
576 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Werneck compared malabarica to H. hirsuta Ferris (from Sigmodon
in the New World). The long series of individuals of malabarica
collected by Elbel makes possible an expanded diagnosis and com-
parison of this species with hirsuta.
In most respects the two species are similar. The thoracic sternal
plate is identical and the shape of the paratergal plates very similar.
The lateral setae of the abdomen (those occurring off the tergal and
sternal plates) are noticeably heavier in hirsuta, although a comparison
of actual specimens is necessary to satisfactorily show this difference.
The form of the paratergal plates and their setation is highly variable
in both species. Female malabarica always have one long apical
seta on plates IV-VI (on VI this seta may be very long); the second
apical seta on the above plates is minute or absent. One abnormal
female examined had two long setae on paratergal plate IV. In hirsuta
females plates IV-VI always have two long setae (fig. 10). Para-
tergal plate VI of hirsuta usually has two apical angles, although in
occasional specimens there are no free angles. Malabarica females
have a dorsal angle on plate VI, but usually the ventral angle is
rounded and not free. Generally, hirsuta females have more setae
in the abdominal rows. Werneck draws and describes the female
of malabarica as having neither tergal nor sternal plates on the typical
abdominal segments. This condition was not true of the Thai
specimens, the plates being invariably present although often ex-
tremely narrow and incomplete. In hirsuta females there are always
three or more setae laterally off each abdominal plate both dorsally
and ventrally, while malabarica females have but one or two setae
in these positions.
In males of the two species the setation of the paratergal plates
is extremely variable. In both hirsuta and malabarica the male
usually has one long seta on plates [V—VI with the second seta minute
or absent (compare figs. 11 and 13). However, hirsuta males may
have two long setae on one or all of plates [V—VI, and both types may
be found in a single collection. None of the malabarica males exam-
ined had more than one long apical seta on plates [V-VI. Malabarica
males generally have fewer setae in the abdominal rows than hirsuta
males have. Werneck’s drawing of male malabarica shows no tergal
abdominal plates. All the Thai males have a normal number of nar-
row tergal plates. The male genitalia of malabarica and hirsuta differ
in small but constant fashion. In hzrsuta the parameres (fig. 15) are
strongly curved apically so that were the tips joined by an imaginary
line the parameres would form an almost perfect semicircle apically.
In malabarica the parameres are not so strongly curved inward.
The pseudopenis of hirsuta is usually not serrate, and the angle at
its broadest point is usually about halfway between the base of the
ANOPLURA OF THAILAND—JOHNSON BT
pseudopenis and the inner aspect of the tip. In malabarica the pseudo-
penis is serrate, and the angle at its broadest point is always much
nearer the base of the pseudopenis than it is to the joining of the
inner aspect of the tip.
Specimens of malabarica illustrated were from Bandicota benga-
lensis, RAT BURI, Banpong, Boekphrai. Drawings of male and female
paratergal plates of hirsuta were taken from specimens from Florida,
and the male genitalia from a specimen from the Panama Canal
Zone—all from Sigmodon.
Hoplopleura pacifica Ewing
Hoplopleura pacifica Ewing, Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bull., No. 14, p. 9, figs.
1b-c, 1924.—Hopkins, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, vol. 119, p. 481, 1949.
Hoplopleura oenomydis, Ferris, Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bull., No. 98, p. 121
(in part), 1932; The sucking lice, p. 139 (in part), 1951.—Pritchard, Journ.
Parasit., vol. 35, p. 374, 1947.
Hoplopleura pacijica was described from five males and seven
females collected off Rattus hawaiiensis [Rattus exulans hawatiensis],
Hawaiian Islands.
New recorps: A long series of specimens from Rattus rattus ssp.
from the following provinces: Chiengmai, Rat Buri, Chaiyaphum,
Nakhon Ratchasima (—Khorat), and Chiang Rai.
H. pacifica is the characteristic louse parasite of Thai F. rattus.
Hopkins (1949) records all Hoplopleura specimens from Rattus
species as pacifica, not H. oenomydis Ferris, and notes that H. oenomy-
dis is restricted, so far as is known, to the African murine genus
Oenomys.
Diagnoses and descriptions of oenomydis and pacifica, together with
host records, are being prepared for publication by Captain John E.
Scanlon; therefore, no diagnoses are included in this paper.
Hoplopleura thurmanae, new species
Fiaures 17-19, 22-23, 25
Tyre pata: Holotype female from Tamiops macelellandi, wort:
Dan Sai, Na Phung, Ban Khok, Namlang Mountain, May 29, 1955,
RE-5416, R. E. Elbel collector. Allotype male, same data, but
June 3, 1955, RE-5512. Paratype male, same data but May 23,
1955, RE-5290. Paratype female, same data, but May 29, 1955,
RE-5415. Paratype female, same data, but June 6, 1955, RE-5555.
Paratype female, same data, but June 1, 1955, RE-5460. Four
male, one female paratypes from Tamiops macclellandi ssp., CHAIYA-
PHUM: Phukhieo, Ban Kaeng, Ban Lat, January 16, 1952, RE-355.
Four male, four female paratypes, same data, but January 18, 1955,
505126—59——_2
578 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Ficures 17-18.—Hoplopleura thurmanae, new species: 17, Holotype 9; 18, Allotype o.
RE-369-371. One male, one female paratypes from Tamiops
rodolphei, locality as above, December 19, 1952, RE-931. One
female paratype from Tamiops rodolphei, Phukheio, Ban Kaeng,
Ban Non Taolek, December 14, 1952, RE-900. One male paratype
from Tamiops sp., KANCHANABURI: Bo Phloi, March 26, 1952,
RE-563. One male, five female paratypes from Tamiops macclel-
landi, cu1ENGMAI: Chiengmai, Ban Den, February 6, 1952, D. C.
and E. B. Thurman collectors, TT—23—24.
Holotype deposited in the U.S. National Museum, type-catalog
No. 64382.
Also examined: One male, three females from Menetes berdmorei
ssp., KANCHANABURI: Bo Phloi, July 16, 1952, Y—308.
This species is named for my friend and colleague, one of the
collectors, Dr. Ernestine B. Thurman,
Dracnosts: This species is very closely related to Hoplopleura
erismata Ferris from Callosciurus species. The female of H. thurmanae
ANOPLURA OF THAILAND—JOHNSON 579
has the posterior angles of paratergal plates IV-VI produced into
acute points that are almost as long as the apical setae. In erismata
the apical angles of paratergal plates ['V—V are very short, obviously
much shorter than the apical setae, and paratergal plate VI has
scarcely any angles. In the male of thurmanae, the apical angles of
paratergal plates 1V—VI are not so long as in the female, but definitely
longer than in erismata. H. thurmanae also differs from ertsmata in
the shape of the thoracic sternal plate (compare figs. 25 and 26).
In thurmanae the plate has definite lateral and anterior angles; in
erismata the lateral angles are smoothed out so that the lateral and
anterior margins form a continuous curve. Male genitalia of the
two species are quite different (compare figs. 23 and 24).
Description: Female: Head rounded anteriorly, postantennal
angles definite but rounded; postantennal head margins slightly
convergent posteriorly. Thorax with thoracic sternal plate diamond-
shaped, the posterior angle more produced than the anterior angle.
Abdomen with outermost of the two modified setae on the first
sternal plate of segment 3 usually definitely bent. Typical abdominal
segment with three narrow sternal and tergal plates; both dorsally
and ventrally with one seta lateraily on each side, off the plates.
Paratergal plates as in figure 22; plates IV-—V produced inward
anteriorly toward the midline both dorsally and ventrally. Plates
IV-VI with apical angles produced mto long acute points which
are almost as long as the apical setae; plate VII lacking posterior
angles but not much reduced.
Male: Head as in female except third antennal segment with a
short stout dorsal seta. Thorax as in female. Abdomen with outer-
most of the two modified setae on the first sternal plate of segment 3
usually definitely bent. Sternal and tergal plates as in genus, nar-
rowed but not strongly reduced; one or two setae laterally off tergal
plates of segments 4—6, and one seta laterally on sternites 4-6, midway
between the two sternal plates of each of these segments. Paratergal
plates IV-VI and sometimes VII anteriorly produced inward toward
midline both dorsally and ventraily. Plate VII not noticeabiy re-
duced; plates IV—VI with posterior angles produced into points
that are not so long as in female, being no more than half the length
of the apical setae. Genitalia with parameres poorly sclerotized,
particularly basally; pseudopenis with triangular flanges on each
side at about middle, its apex triangular, slightly serrate.
Lengths: Female 1.15-1.2 mm.; male 0.85 mm.
One collection of H. thurmanae was taken from Menetes, but that
this is a normal occurrence needs to be confirmed.
580 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
Hoplopleura erismata Ferris
Figures 20-21, 24, 26
Hoplopleura erismata Ferris, Contributions toward a monograph of the sucking
lice, pt. 2, p. 113, figs. 72B, 72E, 72F, 1921; The sucking lice, p. 136, 1951.
Ferris described erismata from Thailand from Callosciurus
ferrugineus, C. caniceps, and Tamiops sp. Holotype female from
C. ferrugineus, Southeast Siam. It is very likely that the specimens
taken from Jamiops were actually H. thurmanae.
New rREcoRDS: Two males, two females from Callosciurus finlaysoni
tacherdi, NAKHON RATCHASIMA (=KHORAT): Sikhui, Pakchong, June
Se a
——
—_
/
fe
Bw) 4 "\
4, (y )
Ficures 19-26.—Hoplopleura thurmanae, new species, and H. erismata: 19, Head, H,
thurmanae, holotype 2 ; 20 Same, H. erismata, ? ; 21, Paratergal plates II-VI, H. erismata.
2; 22, Same, H. thurmanae, holotype 9 ; 23, Genitalia, H. thurmanae, allotype &; 24,
Same, H. erismata, oc’; 25, Thoracic sternal plate, H. thurmanae, holotype 9 ; 26, Same,
H. erismata, 2.
ANOPLURA OF THAILAND—JOHNSON 581
6, 1952, Y-216-221. Five females from Callosciurus caniceps, CHIANG
RAI: Chiang Saen Khao, Ban Sop Luak, March 2, 1953, RE-2340.
One male from C. caniceps, KAMPHAENG PHET: Khlong Khlung,
Ban Hua Thanon, April 4, 1953, RE-2365. Two males, five females
from C. caniceps, NAHKON SAWAN: Pak Nam Pho, Khao Khat Mt.,
May 13, 1953, RE-2539. One female from C. caniceps, torr: Dan
Sai, Kok Sathon, Phu Lom Lo Mt., February 28, 1955, RE-4824.
A series of males and females from Callosciurus finlaysoni, Dan Sai,
Kok Sathon, Phu Lom Lo Mt. and Phak Khi Nak Mt., February
and March 1955, RE-4800, 5018, 5058, 5063, and 5105. A series of
males and females from C. finlaysoni, Dan Sai, Na Phung, Ban
Khok, Namlang Mt., May and June 1955, RE-5399, 5486, 5546,
and 5585.
H. erismata is easily determined by reference to the original descrip-
tion and drawings by Ferris. It should be added that in the male,
paratergal plates IV-VI (not IV and V as in the female) have the
anterior angles strongly produced toward the midline of the body.
The paired modified setae on the first sternal plate of abdominal
segment 3 are often not so strongly developed as in most species of
Hoplopleura, although this is not always the case, and sometimes the
outer setae may be not only heavy but noticeably bent.
Lengths: Male 0.95-1.1 mm.; female 1.3-1.5 mm.
Neohaematopinus callosciuri, new species
FIGuRES 27-28, 34b, 35c, 42-43
Neohaematopinus sciurinus, Ferris, Contributions toward a monograph of the
sucking lice, pt. 4, pp. 244, 245, 1923 (in part, records from Callosciturus).—
Hopkins, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, vol. 119, pp. 459, 460, 1949 (records
from Callosciurus).
Type pata: Holotype male, allotype female, and two male and four
female paratypes from Callosciurus jfinlaysoni, tort: Dan Sai, Kok
Sathon, Phu Lom Lo Mt., February 26, 1955, RE-4800, R. E. Elbel
collector. A series of 179 male and female paratypes from Callosciurus
Jfinlaysoni, C. caniceps and C. erythracus from the following provinces:
Loei, Chaiyaphum, Rat Buri, Kanchanaburi, Nakhon Sawan, Nakhon
Ratchasima, Prachuap Khiri Khan, Chiang Rai, Kamphaeng Phet,
and Lop Buri, collected 1952-55. Two male and one female para-
types from C. erythraeus, Formosa: Ma-an Lio, April 12, 1952, D. H.
Johnson collector, DJ—7274. One male and two female paratypes,
same data, but April 19, 1952, H. J. Stanton collector, JHS-6. One
male paratype, same data, but April 16, 1952, JHS-3.
Holotype deposited in the collection of the U.S. National Museum.
type-catalog No. 64383.
582 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VoL. 110
js NCS )
=_ Sele Ge BY
>: Ne! nx A
A, See 28
et
A
I_]= =a) ar aa r
iret So. Kx , SS zi hey
Ke
ee
\eaeek
heat}
=
Ficures 27-33.—Neohaematopinus callosciurt, new species, N. scturinus, and N. semi-
fasciatus: 27, N. callosciuri, allotype 9 ; 28, N. callosciuri, holotype &*; 29, Abnormal
antenna, N. sciurinus, 2 ; Florida from S. niger; 30, Antenna, NV. sciurinus, 9 , Texas from
S. niger; 31, Same, o'; 32, Antenna, N. semifasciatus, o', Alaska from T. hudsonicus; 33,
Same, ?.
I have also seen material of this species from Callosciurus notatus,
North Borneo: Mount Kinabalu, Tenompak, June 18, 1951, collected
by Traub.
Dracnosis: N. callosciuri is very similar to N. sciwrt Jancke and
N. sciurinus (Mjéberg), differing only in the shape of the basal
antennal segment and size of its posteroapical enlarged seta. It is
separable from sciurinus in that the enlarged seta on the first antennal
segment is not as large in callosciuri (compare figs. 41 and 42). WN.
callosciurt is distinct from sciuri in that the apical enlarged seta is
borne on a slight prolongation of the basal antennal segment, whereas
in sciuri the basal segment is not modified and the enlarged seta is
set back from the margin (compare figs. 40 and 42). N. callosciurt
differs from both sciuri and sciurinus in having a flattened, rather
indistinct (but always present) tubercle on the venter of the basal
antennal segment.
Description: Male: Head broadly rounded anteriorly; postanten-
nal angles marked; posterior head margins only slightly convergent
posteriorly. Basal antennal segment produced posteroapically and
bearing a stout seta; ventrally basal segment with flattened tubercle;
third segment modified, bearing two short, stout setae apically.
Thorax broader than long, about as long as head; sternal plate with
ANOPLURA OF THAILAND—JOHNSON 583
posterior angles produced into points, plate about as broad as long,
its shape varying considerably. Legs typical of genus. Abdomen;
ventrally, segment 2 with two plates; segment 3 with well-developed
plate associated with anterior row of setae; vestige of a plate asso-
ciated with second row of setae; segments 4-6 with one plate, asso-
ciated with first of two rows of setae; lateral seta near paratergal
plates on each side of segments 3-6. Dorsally, posterior plate of
second segment emarginate medially and bearing several stout setae
laterally on each side; remaining segments with one plate associated
with single row of setae; segments 4-7 with one seta laterally off
plate on each side. Paratergal plates with both posterior angles
toothed; apical setae varying in length. Genitalia similar to other
related species.
Female: Head as in male except third antennal segment unmodified.
Thorax and legs as in male. Abdomen having two rows of setae on
segments 2-6 both dorsally and ventrally; plate associated with
anterior row of each segment; posterior row with small areas of
sclerotization around each setal base. Paratergal plates as in male.
Genitalia not diagnostic.
Lengths: Male 1.5-1.7 mm.; female 2.1-2.2 mm.
Neohaematopinus cognatus, new species
Fiaures 34a, 35d, 39, 44
Neohaematopinus sciurinus, Ferris, Contributions toward a monograph of the
sucking lice, pt. 4, p. 245 (in part, records from Menetes berdmoret), 1923.—
Hopkins, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, vol. 119, p. 460 (records from M.,
berdmoret), 1949.
Typn pata: Holotype male, allotype female from Menetes berd-
more, LOEI: Dan Sai, Kok Sathon, Phu Lom Lo Mt., 8,000 ft.,
February 22, 1955, RE-4765, R. E. Elbel, collector. Three female
paratypes with same data as holotype. A long series of paratypes,
all from Menetes berdmoret, as follows: cHatyApHuM: Phukheio, Ban
Kaeng, Ban Non Taolek, two females, January 16, 1952, RE-357.
Phukheio, Ban Song, January 15, 1953, one female, RE-993.
KANCHANABURI: Ban Nua, May 7, 1952, one male, three females,
B-721, F-722, F-730. Tamuang City, May 12, 1952, one male,
F-741. Kanchanaburi City, June 11, 1952, two females, F-878,
F-881. Bo Phloi, March 13, 1952, three males, five females, RE-516.
July 16, 1952, one female, Y-308. Purr BuRI: Khao Yoi, Nong
Chum Phon, July 14, 1952, four females, F-981. NAKHON SAWAN:
Phayuhakhiri, Ban Phayuhadaen, March 6, 1953, five males, five
females, RE-1645. Wat Sai (forest), March 29, 1953, two males,
one female, RE-1699. Pak Nam Pho, Khao Khat, April 10, 1953,
one male, one female, RE-1738. May 7, 1953, five males, five
584 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 110
o
\2097" 212;
213, 215, 218, 224
auritus ariel, 132
auritus auritus, 132
auritus christiei, 132
auritus homochrous, 132
auritus kozlovi, 132
auritus meridionalis, 132
auritus mMordax, 132
auritus puck, 132
auritus sacrimontis, 132
auritus teneriffae, 132
auritus wardi, 132
crassidens, 208, 213, 215
grandis, 208
lecontii, 161
macrotis, 136, 154, 155, 156, 161,
163, 166, 167, 197
macrotis pallescens, 143
maugei, 203
INDEX
Plecotus, megalotis mexicanus, 143
mexicanus, 102, 110, 114, 137, 138,
139, 140, 141, 142, 148, 144 (fig.),
145, 146, 147, 153, 166, 167, 170,
185, 187; 192, 212, 216 (fig.),
219, 226
phyllotis, 98, 107 (fig.), 110, 112,
1135 L149 LS Ges, 121
(fig.), 129, 130, 131, 139, 140, 212,
218, 224
rafinesquii, 110, 114 (fig.), 115 (fig.),
116, 137, 188, 139, 141, 1438, 751,
152, 163, 164, 166, 167, 168, 202,
212, 215, 216 (fig.), 220, 227
rafinesquii macrotis, 152, 161, 164,
220, 227
rafinesquii mexicanus, 141, 143, 185
rafinesquii pallescens, 190
rafinesquii rafinesquii, 152, 162,
168, 220, 227
tetralophodon, 136, 138, 139, 140,
210, 215
townsendii, 103, 107 (fig.), 110, 112,
113, 114 (fig.), 115, 116, 117 (fig.),
118, 120 (fig.), 121 (fig.), 126, 137,
138,
145,
153,
ie.)
139, 140, 141, 143, 144 (fig.),
146, 147, 148, 149, 151, 152,
156, 166, 172, 185, 186, 187,
188, 189, 190, 193, 194, 197, 198,
210, 212, 215, 216 (fig.)
townsendii australis, 142, 143, 144
(fig.), 147, 152, 153, 185, 187, 188,
191, 192, 221, 228
townsendii ingens, 153, 186, 187,
188, 189, 191, 202, 221, 228
townsendii “intermedius,’’ 192, 193
townsendi pallescens, 142, 143, 147,
152, 153, 154, 183 (fig.), 184 (fig.),
186, 187, 188, 190, 198, 199, 200,
222, 230
townsendii townsendii, 153, 186,
191, 197, 223, 232
townsendii virginianus, 139, 152,
153, 186, 187, 190, 201, 223, 232
subg., 96, 107, 109, 110, 116, 132,
154, 207 (fig.), 213
Plectiscinae, 398, 474, 475 (fig.), 476
(key), 506
Plectiscus, 476
varius, 474, 475 (fig.)
plectrocolum, Apion, 250, 257, 282, 287
g.), 288
pleuralis, Eclytus, 421
Poa sp., 80
podagricus, Triclistus, 481
Podisma, 4, 75
Polistes, 439
Polyblastus, 423, 426
pedalis, 423, 425 (fig.)
polychrosidis, Campoplex, 490
Polyeyrtus, 439
semialbus, 440 (fig.), 443
Polyplax, 595, 596, 597
asiatica, 594
cannomydis, 594, 596 (fig.), 598 (fig.)
spinulosa, 570, 597, 598 (fig.)
615
Polysphinctini, 395, 399, 400, 405,
406 (fig.), 407 (key)
polystachys, Phaseolus, 301
Polyterus, 471
olympiae, 471, 472 (fig.)
polytomi, Ischnus, 446
Polytribax, 426
pomorum, Scambus, 401, 404
Tromera, 404
porcatum, Apion, 250, 256, 331, 332, 339
(fig.), 346
praecatorius, Xorides, 415
pretiosus, Brachycyrtus, 425 (fig.), 428
prevosti, Callosciurus, 574
prismaticus, Labrorychus, 503
Pristomerus, 495
austrinus, 495
euryptychiae, 495
pacificus appalachianus, 495
vulnerator, 495
Probolus sp., 451 (fig.)
Prochas, 481, 489
theclae, 488 (fig.), 489, 491, 492
proclive, Apion, 250, 258, 274, 281, 282,
287 (fig.), 289
Proechimys, 515, 562
myosuros, 561
Proenderleinellus, 597
calvus, 597, 598 (fig.)
Promethus, 478
monticola, 478
propinquicorne, Apion, 250, 255, 274,
276 (fig.), 277
Proscus suspicax, 448
Prosthodocis subg., 420
Protarchus, 397, 465, 468
testatorius, 471
Protichneumon, 456, 458
sp., 456
Protichneumonini, 448, 456, 457 (fig.),
458 (key)
pseudacacia, Robinia, 377
Pseudamblyteles, 448, 449, 456
animosus rubellus, 456
nuncias, 454 (fig.), 456
subfuscus, 456
Pseudischnus, 427, 439
oregonensis, 443, 444 (fig.)
Psoralea esculenta, 381
physodes, 370
pteronorum, Aptesis, 436
pterophorae, Horogenes, 491
Puccinella sp., 80
puck, Plecotus auritus, 132
pulcherrimus, Phytodietus,
(fig.), 420
punctorius, Horogenes, 491, 492
punctulatus, Ephialtes, 405
punctulirostre, Apion, 250, 254, 322,
323 (fig.) 325
purgatus, Enicospilus, 501
pusillus, Sorex, 208
Pyracmon, 481, 489, 491
xanthognatha, 482 (fig.), 490
pyraustae, Campoplex, 490, 491
417, 418
616
pyrrhorhinos, Mus, 519
Wiedomys, 519
PROCEEDINGS
quadrisetosus, Trichobius, 173
quebecensis, Dusona, 491
Quercus, 211
rafinesquei, Corynorhinus rafinesquei,
189
rafinesquii, Corynorhinus, 161, 163, 201
Plecotus, 110, 114 (fig.), 115 (fig.),
116, 137, 138, 139, 141, 143, 161,
152, 163, 164, 166, 167, 168, 202,
212, 215, 216 (fig.), 220, 227
Plecotis rafinesquii, 152, 162, 163,
220, 227
rattus, Rattus, 520, 577, 597, 598
Rattus concolor, 594
exulans hawaiiensis, 577
hawaiiensis, 577
norvegicus, 597, 598
rattus, 520, 577, 597, 598
surifer, 569
sp., 570, 575, 597, 598
ratzeburgi, Holocremnus, 491, 492
reclusum, Apion, 249
reconditum, Apion, 249, 250, 256, 348
356 (fig.), 361
regalis, Oryzomys subflavus, 543
Reithrodontomys megalotis, 145
reluctator, Echthrus, 446
retusa, Phaseolus, 304, 305
Revilliodia, 206
rex, Oecomys, 519, 543
Oryzomys, 543
Rhembobius, 427, 436
abdominalis, 436, 438 (fig.)
Rhexidermus, 448
huardi, 447 (fig.), 448
Rhinolophidae, 205
Rhinolophus grivensis, 208
Rhipidomys, 518, 522, 526 (fig.)
benevolens, 515, 518, 540, 541
dryas, 518, 533
emiliae, 519
klagesi, 546
maculipes, 519
marmosurus, 546
paricola, 518, 535
phaeotis, 518, 540
roberti, 559
rosilla, 518, 535, 538, 539
Rhorus, 465
clapini, 467 (fig.), 468
mesoanthus, 468
Rhypidomys benevolens, 535
Rhyssa, 392
sp, 411, 412 (fig.)
Rhyssini, 399, 400, 411, 412 (fig.)
rileyi, Xorides, 415, 416 (fig.)
roberti, Oecomys, 559
Oryzomys, 518, 559, 560
Oryzomys concolor, 517, 519, 559,
560, 561
Rhipidomys, 559
Robinia pseudacacia (black locust), 377
OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM
VOL. 110
rodolphei, Tamiops, 578
Rosa, 474
rosae, Zaleptopygus, 495
rosilla, Oryzomys, 535, 536-537
Rhipidomys, 518, 535, 538, 539
rostrata, Corylus, 50
rostrum, Apion, 249, 251, 257, 307, 308,
378, 379 (fig.), 384
rubellus, Pseudamblyteles animosus, 456
rubicundus, Melanichneumon, 456
rubicus, Pimplopterus, 462 (fig.), 463
rubiginosus, Hyposoter, 491
Rubus, 474
rufescens, Nenetes berdmorei, 574
ruficollis, Ephialtes, 405, 506
ruficoxalis, Lamachus, 471
rufifemur, Campoplex, 490, 492
rufigenis, Dremomys, 592
Enderleinellus, 572
rufinulum, Apion, 346
rufipenne, Apion, 249, 250, 255, 331,
332, 339 (fig.), 346
rufiventrus, Zootrephus, 476, 477 (fig.)
rufopectus, Tromatobia, 403 (fig.), 405
rugglesi, Melanoplus, 60, 66
russatus, Hesperomys, 552
rusticus, Ischnoceros, 415
rutilus, Oecomys, 535, 536-537, 539
sacrimontis, Plecotus auritus, 132
sagax, Apion, 350
Salix strobiloides, 280
salodorensis, Myotis, 206
Samonyeteris, 206, 207 (fig.)
sancti-albani, Myotis, 206, 208
sancti-felicis, Apion, 250, 253, 309, 316
(figs) 9320
sapellanus, Melanoplus, 4, 75, 76
sayi, Apion, 250, 254, 275, 295, 296, 299
(fig.), 8300, 301, 306
seabriculus, Hybophanes, 417, 421, 422
fi
(fig.)
Seambus, 394, 401, 404
brevicornis, 404
detritus, 404
foliae, 404
hispae, 402 (fig.), 404
pomorum, 401, 404
scandens, Melanoplus, 4, 69
Melanoplus extremus, 68
Scarabeidae, 496
Searcobatus sp., (greasewood), 80
scelestus, Chasmias, 456
scitulus, Exochus, 479 (fig.), 481
sciuri, Neohaematopinus, 582, 584 (fig.),
585
sciurinus, Haematopinus, 585
Neohaematopinus, 581, 582 (fig.),
583, 584 (fig.), 585, 586, 587
sciuropteri, Neohaematopinus, 587, 588,
589, 590 (fig.), 591
Sciurus, 585
carolinensis, 584, 585, 586, 587
douglasi, 585
niger, 582, 584, 585, 586
vulgaris, 584, 585, 587
INDEX
Scolobates, 465
auriculatus, 466, 467 (fig.)
Scolobatini, 466, 467 (fig.), 468
Scolomys, 514
Scotomanes ornatus, 109
scriptus, Caloptenus, 4, 14
Melanoplus, 4, 15
scrobicolle, Apion, 384, 385
scutellaris, Diplazon, 476
selectus, Caloptenus, 4, 8, 9
Melanoplus, 4
semialbus, Polyeyrtus, 440 (fig.), 443
semicastaneum, Apion, 346
semifasciatus, Neohaematopinus, 582
(fig.), 584 (fig.), 586
Neohaematopinus antennatus, 585
septentrionalis, Melanoplus, 4, 37 (fig.),
9
Pezotettis, 4, 67
Sequoia, 211
sesiovora, Lampronota, 461
sexannulatus, Cryptus, 426, 446
Short, J. R. T.; A description and clas-
sification of the final instar larvae
of the Ichneumonidae (Insecta,
Hymenoptera), 391
sierranus, Melanoplus, 4, 15
Sigmodon, 577
Sigmodontomys, 514
signatus, Syrphoctonus, 478
simile, Apion, 249, 250, 258, 273, 274,
275, 276 (fig.), 278, 282
simillimus, Hemiteles, 436
Simonycteris, 206, 207 (fig.)
simplex, Hesperomys, 519, 520
smithi, Apion, 249
smithii, Mastrus, 429, 435
sodalis, Myotis, 170
Sorex pusillus, 208
speciosus, Oryzomys, 553, 554, 555, 556
Oryzomys concolor, 517, 518, 550,
568
spectator, Apion, 325, 326
Sphecophaga thuringiaca, 438 (fig.), 439
vesparum, 439
sp., 439
Sphecophagini, 427, 428, 439
spicata, Tephrosia, 344
spiculiferum, Apion, 250, 272
Spilogale, 109
spinitarse, Apion, 250, 254, 309, 321
spinulosa, Polyplax, 570, 697, 598 (fig.)
spinulosus, Pediculus, 597
splendens, Oecomys, 553, 554, 555, 556
spretis, Acridium, 4, 55
Melanoplus, 4, 55
spretus, Caloptenus, 4, 52
Melanoplus; 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 10, 12, 13
(fig.), 17 (fig.), 18, 19 (fig.), 22,
27 (fig.), 29, 37 (fig.), 52, 54,
56 (fig.), 59 (fig.)
Spudastica, 489
kriechbaumeri, 492
Stehlinia, 206, 207 (fig.)
stemmator, Xanthopimpla, 409 (fig.),
411
617
Stenapion subg., 248
stenomae, Xiphosomella, 495
stercorator, Iseropus stercorator, 405
Stilpnus, 428, 436
anthomyidiperda, 435 (fig.)
stokesi, Gambrus, 44
Streblidae, 173
strenuum, Astiphromma, 458
striatus, Ipoctoninus, 471, 472 (fig.)
strobiloides, Salix, 280
Strophostyles helvola, 308
leiosperma, 308
pauciflora, 308
umbellata, 308
sp., 301
stupefactus, Melanoplus, 4
Melanoplus borealis, 3, 4, 8, 31
(fig.), 33 (fig.), 37 (fig.), 49 (fig.),
59 (fig.), 71, 75, 78
Pezotettix, 4, 75
subclavatus, Endasys, 433 (fig.), 485
subflavus, Oryzomys, 518, 519, 524
(fig.), 543
Pipistrellus, 108, 170, 172
subfuscus, Phygadeuon, 434 (fig.), 435
Pseudamblyteles, 456
Pub euEs Oryzomys flavicans, 546, 551,
55
submetallicum, Apion, 250, 258, 326,
327 (fig.), 330
subnudum, Apion, 272
subrufum, Apion, 249, 250, 256, 263,
348, 356 (fig.), 363
subrufus, Amblyteles, 456
subsequens, Apion, 250, 256, 348, 356
(fig.), 364
subtinctum, Apion, 249, 250, 256, 348,
365
subulatus, Myotis, 126, 170
Cryzomys, 546
Vespertilio, 198
superans, Oecomys, 556
Oryzomys, 556, 557, 558, 559
Oryzomys concolor, 517, 519, 531,
550, 666, 558
superba, Glauconycteris, 109
superciliosum, Apion, 278
surifer, Rattus, 569
suspicax, Proscus, 448
suspiciosus, Ichneumon, 456
suzukii, Nippocryptus, 4438 (fig.)
Symphyta, 439
Synomelix, 471
sp., 471, 472 (fig.)
Synotus, 105, 164
lecontii, 161
macrotis, 161, 164, 190
maugei, 203
townsendi, 190
townsendii, 197
syrphicola, Ethelurgus, 431 (fig.), 435
Syrphidae, 476
Syrphoctonus, 478
agilis, 476
maculifrons, 476, 477 (fig.)
signatus, 478
618
Syrphoctonus tarsatorius, 478
Syzeuctus aculatmorius, 463
tabogense, Apion, 247, 250, 273
tacherdi, Callosciurus finlaysoni, 580
Tadarida brasiliensis, 172
mexicana, 170
Tamiasciurus, 165, 584, 586
douglasi, 585, 586
hudsonicus, 586
sp., 585
Tamiops hudsonicus, 582
macclellandi, 570, 571, 577,
rodolphei, 578
sp., 578, 580
tantillus, Gelis, 429, 433 (fig.), 485
tapajinus, Oecomys, 546, 547, 548-549,
554
578
tarsatorius, Syrphoctonus, 478
tarsilas, Mesoleius, 468
taylori, Petaurista, 594
tectus, Oryzomys, 515, 518, 546, 547,
548-549, 551
Oryzomys tectus, 546
tenebricosum, Apion, 275
tenellus, Gelis, 486
teneriffae, Plecotus auritus, 132 (map)
Tenthredinidae, 421, 423, 426, 481
ashes tea Mesoleius, 468, ‘469 (fig.),
Teniiecinipiiees 465, 468
tenuirostrum, Apion, 249
tenuiventris, ‘Casinaria, 491
Tephrosia spicata, 344
terebrator, Dusona, 491
Tersilochini, 398, 495, 496 (fig.)
Tersilochus argentinensis, 496 (fig.)
conotracheli, 496
sp., 496
testatorius, Protarchus, 471
tetragonus, Diplazon, 478
tetralophodon, Corynorhinus, 140, 2/0
Pipeobue 136, 138, 139, 140, 210,
15
texana, Oxyrrhexis carbonator, 406 (fig.),
407
texanum, Eiphosoma, 495
thaiwanensis, Callosclurus erythraeus,
57
Thaumatotypus, 429
paradoxus, 432 (fig.), 435
Thecla empusa, 489
theclae, Prochas, 488 (fig.), 489, 491, 492
Therion, 504
circumflexum, 500 (fig.), 504
morio, 504
Therionini, 500 (fig.), 502, 504 (key)
Theronia, 413
atalantae, 413, 414 (fig.)
Theroniini, 399, 400, 401, 413, 414 (fig.)
thoracicus, Euceros, 467 (fig.), 468
thuringiaca, Sphecophaga, 438 (fig.), 439
thurmanae, Hoplopleura, 577, 578 (fig.),
580 (fig.)
Thymaridini, 420, 421 (key), 422 (fig.)
Thyreodon atricolor, 501
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM
VOL, 110
thyridopteryx, Phobetes, 432 (fig.), 435
thysanodes, Myotis, 108, 169, 170
Thysiotorus, 429
sp., 434 (fig.), 435
tibialis, Charopsimorpha, 491
tinctoria, Baptisia, 386
tityri, Ophion, 501
tosensis, Campoplex, 490, 491
townsendi, Corynorhinus, 190, 197
Synotus, 190 |
townsendii, Corynorhinus macrotis, 197 |
Corynorhinus megalotis, 197
Corynorhinus rafinesquii, 197
Corynorhinus townsendii, 197
Plecotus, 103, 107 (fig.), 110, 112,
1138, i14 (fig op aa a 116, 117
(fig.), 118, 120 (fig.), 121 (fig.),
126, 137, 188, 139, 140, 141, 143,
144, (fig.), 145, 146, 147, 148,
149, 151, 152, 153, 156, 16, 172,
185, 187, 188, 189, 190, 193, 194,
197, 198, 210, 212, 215, 216 (fig.)
Plecotus townsendii, 153, 186, 191,
197, 223, 232
Synotus, 197 |
trabeatus, Oecomys, 533 |
Oryzomys bicolor, 516, 518, 532,
533, 534
Trichapion subg., 247, 248, 249, 251, |
252 (key), 260, 347 |
Trichobius corynorhini, 173
quadrisetosus, 173
Trichomma enecator, 504
occisor, 506
clues Oryzomys, 546, 548-549, 551,
55
Triclistus, 398, 478, 480
curvator, 479 (fig.), 480
podagricus, 481
tricolor, Exenterus, 426
Hyposoter, 492
tricoloripes, Campoplex, 490
Trigonophymus mexicanus, 10
ee ee 547, 553, 554, 555,
55
triste, Apion, 279
tristis, Biolysia, 484 (fig.), 491
Trogini, 446, 457 (fig.), 448
troglodytes, Apion, 249
Trogus, 458
pennator, 457 (fig.), 458
Tromatobia, 401, 405
rufopectus, 403 (fig.), 405
zonata, 405
Tromera pomorum, 404
Trychosis, 427, 439
sp., 441 (fig.), 443
Trypanosoma vespertilionis, 174
Tryphoninae, 397, 417, 418 (fig.), 419
(key), aie 422 (fig.), 423, 425
(fig.), 504, 506
Seles 120, 428, 425 (fig.), 426
ey
tsugae, Lamachus, 471
tuberosa, Apios, 343
turbulentum, Apion, 361, 362
INDEX 619
turionellae, Pimpla, 410 vulgaris, Sciurus, 584, 585, 587
typicalis, Melanoplus, 4 vulnerator, Pristomerus, 495
Melanoplus, devastator, 42, 43 vulturnus, Melanoplus bilituratus, 4, 7,
12, 13 dig.) 5: 14547 Ag.) .e9
Ulmus, 211 (fig.), 25, 27 (fig.), 29, 31 (fig.),
umbellata, Strophostyles, 308 33 (fig.), 37 (fig.), 56 (fig.), 65
unicincta, Charopsimorpha, 488 (fig.),
491 walsheai, Phaeogenes walshiae, 448
__ Phobocampe, 492 walshii, Apion, 279, 280
unifasciatorius, Cratichneumon, 456 wardi, Plecotus auritus, 132
uniformis, Melanoplus, 4, 41, 43 waterhousii. Macrotus, 205
utahensis, Melanoplus, 52, 81, 83 Wiedomys pyrrhorhinus, 519
Melanoplus borealis, 4, 8, 31 (fig.), | Wvyethi lexicaulis. 52
jean ie 49" (ies 50
(fig.), 78, 79, 81 xanthaeolus, Cryzomys, 543
validus, Campoplex, 482 (fig.), 490, 492 | *@2thocampoplex, 490
Aer nigromaculatus, 482 (fig.), 490
variabilis, Dusona, 491 sp., 490
aa ee Calliephialtes, 402 (fig.), 404, xanthognatha, Pyracmon, 482 (fig.), 490
varipes, Zaglyptus varipes, 405 mone pple, 308/207 )410
varius, Plectiscus, 474, 475 (fig.) rede ae
velifer, Myotis, 120 (fig.), 170, 172, 174 enderleinie4ti
velox, Aoplus, 456 pedator 411
Veronia interior, 369 stemmator, 409 (fig.), 411
verrucosa, Betula, 280 vs ?
Xiphosomella, 495
vesparum, Sphecophaga, 439 skenoniac. 495
Vespertilio, 105, 132, 207 (fig.), 208 Z
auritus, 127, 132 Xorides, 295, 415, 502
grivensis, 208 Ue ae
j irrigator
eee praecatorius, 415
maugei, 203 ees
megalotis, 154, 155, 156, 168 Bar aa
subulatus, 198
Apes Xoridescopus, 415
Vespertilionidae, 104, 106, 206 1s
Vespertilioninae, 104, 106 Sr ae ates
vespertilionis, Trypanosoma, 174 Monin 399, 400, 401 415 416 (fig.)
Vespula, 439 428 507. : : ie
vicencianus, Oryzomys, 546, 547, 548-
549, 550, 553 Xyela, 421
vicinum, Apion, 279
vincibilis, Phaeogenes, 448 yumanensis, Myotis, 108, 169, 170
vinosum, Apion, 249, 250, 258, 291, 294
vinulae, Netelia, 420 Zaglyptus, 405
virescens, Pedies, 9 varipes varipes, 405
virgatus, Melanoplus, 4, 42, 43 Zaleptopygus, 495
virginianus, Corynorhinus townsendii, flavo-orbitalis, 495
201 gallaecola, 495
Lamachus, 470 (fig.), 471 rosae, 495
Plecotus, townsendii, 139, 152, 153, sp., 495
186, 187, 190, 201, 223, 232 Zatypota, 407
vitticollis, Dusona vitticollis, 485 (fig.), sp., 406 (fig.), 407
491 zonata, Tromatobia, 405
Mesochorus, 459 Zootrephus, 478
volans, Myotis, 169, 170 Zootrephus rufiventrus, 476, 477 (fig.)
O
- =
C4 Mahl quirk: dal faa
\ apiquasdat |
Heres TOS ae gaia
H
t +
°
Fi
!
|
\
|
\
j
:
j
oe ual
‘ 2 it
Wale ri ie a
Pi bo fetes Oey
;
b Ut:
{ ‘
et
se
Whee gh
:. me
UTX GOL aitog.
7 —— YY 7
¥ id _
oi) yt 7
7 : 7 : x ; ie : De
ae tia iy "a a
+ 4
j eu : + ie : : 7
ry 7
- oJ
, , : Y fl a
. i a. - ‘
‘ ; ; 5
a
. 7 7 _ 5 a
7 ‘ a i = ’ y e io
Y # +
7 ‘ = a 7
7 ; 7 7 7 7
7 A. oe / . SS
_ ‘ : -
; i _ ~~ .
7 no a j : a a ‘ :
’ rs 7 "
iy I : : (f) 7
: _ ‘ ’
7 . y - 7 '
i : > i.)
an : i :
oo oF 7 "2
7 .
ap i) Ww yy
iy A a 7 7 :
i 7 7
: : a ” i
: =
i ' vd - .
La Vt
} a)
i a 7 7 i Ae 7
7 : ’
: ——, ah. i
: ae :
7 i
i _ :
ah
1 i
- co
: : ;
i Dai
: :
‘ : - o
7 :
‘ on
- i -
4) Onn
_ : : 7 .
v a
it - =
=o: =
— - io a , 7 7 7
en ie
'
‘ s 7 :
: 7
,
. i = ¥
, ‘ J -
n 1
7 _
' 7 a ; / 7 aut
oe 7 » se 7 > WK, .
a a , 7
> ot i , i= 7
7 ; 2 oT] a
i - - 4 D 7 ie : ; 7 =
- Ji on ‘ - “6 : ii 7
Ua 7 - i} 7 - 2 , ] ‘ i! %
ce 7 7 '
- : — ‘awn ; 7 v - i 7
= (a “w-ante es ae 2 Ole
ri ay on A 7 * 7
g ‘ i‘ 7 feo
: ; — : j 7 (ae 7, eae
i P 1" = - ste =.'. ; - al.
_ 7 ie a -
a ® = : - Ls Ape! 7 : i)
: : a 7 *, Toe cu as
_ 7 r sere 7 7 a _ a
: 7
a i nl
lp oi 7 a ’ if : a - :
: ? : - 7 irl
ae . - 7 7 : i
; 7) a f ' a an o
7 St 1 i n ad
An - : :
; Py '
oe
ro & .
- ?
> , =
~ e : 7.
a a :
- ) ry a
; 5 = 7 + = -
y ,
ae 1
: - - ae f
fl i 7 om oa 1 :
wi sone au 1
- yon -. _ _ 4 a ae =
oo, *
Ae Ay ey Py f) ey
_ *
ary ye
aa ae f
iy
7 i .
a a 5 Li
‘ are | "a
Ti
8 01420 9928
wii
}
|