= Das ey ‘ A : ~ LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY, UNIVERSITY CoLLEGE, LIVERPOOL. cat ECVV ST | DEAR SIR, The Council of the Liverpool Biological Society have much pleasure in presenting to the mee, “ef of the ‘‘ Proceedings and —EE Transactions’’ of their Society. Kindly acknowledge receipt and oblige, | | : ‘ Pa Yours faithfully oat ew Seott ‘ Received from the ‘ Liverpool Biological Society” Vol..... an eae of the ‘ Proceedings and Transactions.” ) ae Ve ¥ 2 + tes } vite cS y =) 7 i / ics img / > . “i e F a 7 - “o ey i é , rr o ‘ an . s " “ ¢ 6 : a ~ . qv i : x aT f 5 : oh a : ~ i . ‘ nt , : / { | U ~ 1 ‘ s! } a = i 20h Thdesao) 7 Pie sae ot F t aie be Cyr ee Fs | 4 bp a ] ind: Ue Peas by a) 2 | DO ee) b Ma Fie ; Phy y vt Oa ee SS cama sgh igh WNL dewey 764 3% es ‘B tt? 3 200 * Lene ee PRdi dah se? ANS Sette. ete Nom OR = > pee A 5 “ ry i i \ 5 i H : 5 ' a aa, ae 2 th A t \ < Mee ae ee ee 5 4 . jo 4 : ¢ : - ' i oy a ) i 7 r \ ie ‘ , ‘ 4 ¢ 4 ¢ cs 5 a 4 ’ ; | j | hy ¢ B hy f qt { =a j K, hi = ) ; : yy, =) i 2 , dee) - é iss \ Ms ” i; a 4 _ PROCEEDINGS is \ ~ oe > PJ 5 _ AND ff - ae / aT a? 4 TRANSACTIONS OF THE vou. xX. a SESSION 1895-96. 3 | ae i ¢ Mt a md) 4 LIVERPOOL: ‘ees ‘Printed By T. Doss & Co., 229, Brownnow Hit, ; g 1896, se | ISG O/ CONTENTS. I. PROCEEDINGS. - PAGE Office-bearers and Council, 1895—96 . = vie Report of the Council . : o> Will: Summary of Proceedings at the Micsiings so ES Laws ofthe Society : : Sy Seve List of Members . XX: Librarian’s Report (with list of eautons "p Tpoey XXIV. Treasurer’s Balance Sheet. ‘ , : --, Ee Il. TRANSACTIONS. Presidential Address on Botanic Gardens—Past and Present. By R. J. Harvey Gisson, M.A., eo.s. . : i Ninth Annual Report of the eee Marine Biology Committee and their Biological Station at Port Erin. By Prof. HpeRpMaAn, D.Sc.,F.R.S. 34 Free-Swimming Copepoda from the West Coast of Treland. By Isaac C. THompson, F.L.8. eae Report on the Investigations carried on in 1895 in connection with the Lancashire Sea-Fisheries Laboratory at University College, Liverpool. By Professor W. A. HeRpMAN, D.Sc., F.R.5., and Mr. ANDREW Scott, Fisheries Assistant. 104 Notes on the Distribution of Amphipoda. By ALFRED O. WALKER, F.L.S. . i TS Ferns and Flowering Plants; a Chapter in Evolution. See et. SCOTT, M.A., Ph.D., E.R.S.. . » “NSE Additional Observations on the Vitality and Ger- mination of Seeds. By A. J. Ewart, B.8c., Ph.D. (Leipzig). ; ; oy 1 ht (486 v4 OF) his ° AOS PP ips \ ust i} hw SUM TAMOLEA aA 7 - Pp 4 ad * J > Py ‘Oy Z = "ine Vee ¥ \ : My - : he ” ¢ t 1 > - “~ ~ * = { ?. ® * ? 7 a) fs A = C . = ‘ ‘ oa r P PROCEEDINGS OF THE POOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. = OFFICE-BEARERS AND COUNCIL. Ex-Presidents : 1886—87 Pror. W. MITCHELL BANKS, M.D., F.R.C.S 1887—88 J. J. DRYSDALE, M.D. 1888—89 Pror. W. A. HERDMAN, D.Sc., F.R.S.E. 1889—90 Pror. W. A. HERDMAN, D.Sc., F.B.S.E. 1890-91 T. J. MOORE, O.M.Z.S. 1891—92 T. J. MOORE, C.M.Z.S., A.LS. 189293 ALFRED O. WALKER, J.P., F.L.S. 189394 JOHN NEWTON, M.R.G.S. 189495 Pror. F. GOTCH, M.A., F.R.S. SHSSION X., 1895-96. President - Pror. R. J. HARVEY GIBSON, M.A. Pice-Presidents : Pror. W. A. HERDMAN, D.Sc., F.R.S. HENRY O. FORBES, LL.D., F.Z.S. Hon. Treasurer : ISAAC C. THOMPSON, F.L.S., F.R.M.S. Hon. Wibrarian: ANDREW SCOTT. How. Secretary: JOSEPH. A. CLUBB, B.Sc. (Vict.). Council : H. C. BEASLEY. JOHN NEWTON, M.R.C.S. Pror. BOYCE, M.B., M.R.C.S. TC. BY LEY. W.J. HALLS. W. E. SHARP. J. SIBLEY HICKS, M.D., F.L.S, A. T. SMITH, Jun. Rey. T. S. LEA, M.A. A. O. WALKER, F.L.S. G. H. MORTON, F.G.S. J. WIGLESWORTH, M.D. REPORT of the COUNCIL. Dvurine the Session 1895-96 there have been seven ordinary meetings of the Society, held as heretofore at University College. A field meeting was arranged for to Hilbre Island, but the weather re so bad, that it had to be abandoned. The communications made to the Society have been representative of almost all branches of Biology and many interesting exhibits have been submitted at the meetings. The change made in the procedure whereby half an hour at the beginnirig’ of the meeting is devoted to mis- cellaneous exhibits, tea and conversation, has proved on the whole satisfactory. As on former occasions the Society has been favoured with an address from a distinguished Biologist from another centre, viz., Dr. Scott, Honorary Keeper of the Jodrell Laboratory, Kew, whose paper, on ‘ Ferns and Flowering Plants,—a chapter in evolution”’ was greatly appreciated. . , The Library still continues to make satisfactory progress as shown by the Librarian’s Report which follows. The Treasurer’s usual statement and balance sheet are appended. No alterations have been made in the Laws of the Society during the past session. Mr. Alfred Leicester, and Dr. Hanitsch former members of the Society, and both of whom have rendered valuable services to the Society have been added to the roll of Honorary Members. The members at present on the roll are as follows :— Honorary Members.......... 9 .Ordinary Members........... 66 Student Members............ 20 SUMMARY of PROCEEDINGS at the MEETINGS. The first meeting of the tenth session was held at University College on Friday, 11th October, 1895. 1. The first part of the proceedings took place in the large Zoology Laboratory from 7 to 8 o’clock. ‘Tea was served at one end of the room and on the tables were the following exhibits :— By Prof. Herdman: a series of sub-marine deposits from the Irish Sea. By Prof. Harvey Gibson; some recent additions to the Botanical Museum of University College, from Kew Gardens. , _ By Dr. H. O. Forbes; a living specimen of the electric cat-fish, (Malapterurus electricus), from the Aquarium of the Free Public Museum. By J. A. Clubb, B.Sc.; some living specimens of fresh-water Polyzoa under the microscope. ‘The President-elect (Prof. R. J. Harvey Gibson, M.A.,) took the chair at 8 o’clock, in the Zoology Theatre. 2. The Report of the Council on the Session 1894-95 (see “Proceedings,” Vol. IX., p. vill.) was read and adopted. 3. The Treasurer’s Balance Sheet for the Session 1894-95 (see ‘‘ Proceedings,” Vol. [X., p. xxxiv.) was sub- mitted and approved. } 4, The Librarian’s Report (see ‘‘ Proceedings,” Vol. IX., p. XXv.) was submitted and approved. 5. The following Office-bearers and Council for the ensuing Session were elected :—Vice-Presidents, Prof. W. A. Herdman, D.Sc., F.R.S., H. O. Forbes, LL.D., F.Z.S.; Hon. Treasurer, I. C. Thompson, F.L.5., X. PROCEEDINGS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. F.R.M.S.; Hon. Librarian, Andrew Scott; Hon. Secretary, Joseph A. Clubb, B.Sc. (Vict.); Council, H.C. Beasley, Prof. Boyce, M.B., M.R.C.S., W. J. Halls, J. Sibley Hicks, M.D., Rev. T. 8S. Lea, M.A., G. H. Morton, F.G.S., John Newton, M.B.C.S., T. C. Ryley, W. E. Sharp, A. T. Smith, Jun., A. O. Walker, F'.L.8., and J. Wiglesworth, M.D. 6. Mr. Alfred Leicester was elected an Honorary Member of the Society. 7. The President delivered the Inaugural Address, eiltitled ‘“‘ Botanic Gardens—past and present”’ (see ‘‘ Tran- sactions,” p. 1). A vote of thanks proposed by Dr. Wiglesworth, seconded by Mr. Alf. O. Walker, was carried with acclamation. The second meeting of the tenth session was held at University College on Friday, November 8th, 1895. The President in the chair. 1. The following exhibits were on view in the Zoological Laboratory from 7 to 8 o’clock :— By Dr. Newton; some examples of pond life under the microscope. By Dr. Forbes; specimens of marine animals preserved in formalin. 2. Mr. G. H. Morton, F'.G.8., gave a short note on some plant remains from the Carboniferous Limestone, and exhibited some artistically prepared restorations drawn by Miss Wood. 3. Prof. Herdman, F.R.S., communicated the Ninth Annual Report on the work of the Liverpool Marine Biology Committee, and the Port Erin Biological Station (see ‘‘ Transactions,” p. 34.) The third meeting of the tenth session was held at SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS AT THE MEETINGS. Xi. University College on Friday, December 18th, 1895. The President in the chair. 1. In the Zoological Laboratory, Mr. Andrew Scott exhibited drawings of eleven species of Copepoda new to the District; Prof. Harvey Gibson showed a series of Botanical preparations arranged for teaching purposes, and Mr. F. J. Cole exhibited microscopic specimens of the nerves of skate, etc. 2. Dr. Grossmann gave an intensely interesting account of Whaling off the Faroe Islands. By means of a beautiful series of lantern slides, the sighting, catching and cutting up of the big whales were most graphically portrayed. An interesting dis- cussion ensued on certain points brought forward in the paper, in which Dr. Newton, Mr. Thompson, the Hon. Secretary and others took part. The fourth meeting of the tenth session was held at University College on Friday, January 10th, 1896. The President in the chair. 1. In the Zoological Laboratory, Prof. Herdman exhibited a series of drawings and microscopic preparations illustrative of the anatomy of the oyster. 2. Mr. I. C. Thompson, F.L.8., gave an account of some free-swimming Copepoda from the West Coast of Ireland. 3. A joint interim Report on Green Oysters and Disease was submitted by Profs. Herdman and Boyce. A series of lantern slides illustrated some of the points of the paper. 4, Dr. H. O. Forbes laid on the table some notes on the brain of the Chimpanzee (Anthropopithecus calvus), which will be published in the next volume of Transactions, together with some additional points. Xll. PROCEEDINGS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. The fifth meeting of the tenth session was held at University College on Friday, February 14th, 1896. The President in the chair. | 1. In the Zoology Laboratory, among other exhibits was a form of photographic camera adapted for taking photographs of living alge in rock pools, and used by the Rev. T. 8. Lea at Port Erin. 2. Rev. T. 8. Lea gave an interesting exhibition of an excellent series of these photographs. 3. Dr. H. O. Forbes laid before the Society a paper on the evidence in favour of the former existence of an Antarctic Continent. He drew some forcible argu- ments from the distribution of both animal and plant life at present prevailing in the extremities of the existing continents of Australia, Africa and S. America, and mainly on the evidence of this distribution he showed an outline map of the possible land connections which may at one time have prevailed. An interesting discussion followed in which Prof. Herdman, Mr. Lomas, Mr. Fitzpatrick and others took part. Various points of Dr. Forbes, paper were freely criticised, and it was generally agreed that a greater knowledge of the depth of the sea in the area involved was required. The sixth meeting of the tenth session was held in University College on Friday, March 13th, 1896. The Vice-President (Prof. Herdman) in the chair. 1. In the Zoology Laboratory, Mr. I. C. Thompson exhibited a form of incandescent gas light suitable as a microscopic lamp. , 2. Mr. Alfred O. Walker contributed a paper on the proportion of genera to species in certain localities, SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS AT MEETINGS. Xill. and advanced some interesting statistics in regard to the same. A discussion followed. 38. Prof. Herdman submitted the Annual Report on the work of the Sea-Fisheries Laboratory for 1895 by Mr. Andrew Scott and himself (see ‘‘ Transactions,” p. 103). 4. Prof. Herdman communicated a series of extracts translated by Mrs. Herdman from Dr. Johan Hjorts ‘‘ Hydrografisk-—Biologiske Studier over Norske Fisherier,”’ a paper dealing with the currents and their effect on the Fisheries of the North Sea. The seventh meeting of the tenth session was held in University College on Friday, May 8th, 1896. The President in the chair. 1. In the Zoological Laboratory a number of microscopic slides were exhibited. 2. Dr. Richard Hanitsch was elected an paieas) Member of the Society. 3. Dr. Scott, Honorary Keeper of the Jodrell Laboratory, Kew, gave an address on “‘ Ferns and Flowering Plants—a chapter in evolution” (see Abstract “Transations,’ p. 181). On the motion of Prof. Weiss, seconded by Dr. Forbes, F.Z.S., and sup- ported by Prof. Herdman, a hearty vote of thanks was accorded to Dr. Scott. 4. Mr. A. J. Ewart, B.Sc., Ph.D., contributed a paper on “Further observations on the Vitality of Seeds” (see “ Transactions,” p. 185). The Annual Field Meeting was arranged for July 25th to Hilbre Island, but as rain was falling heavily at the time of the starting of the train, it was reluctantly decided to abandon the trip. An adjournment to the Museum XIV. PROCEEDINGS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. was agreed to, for the purpose of holding a short business meeting. Prof. Herdman took the chair. On the motion of Prof. Herdman seconded by J. A. Clubb, B.Sc., Dr. Forbes, F.Z.8., was elected President for the next session. LAWS of the LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. I.—The name of the Society shall be the ‘‘ LIvERPOOL BIOLOGICAL Society,” and its object the advancement of Biological Science. I1.—The Ordinary Meetings of the Society shall be held at University College, at Seven o’clock, during the six Winter Months, on the second Friday evening in every month, or at such other place or time as the Council may appoint. III.—The business of the Society shall be conducted by a President, two Vice-Presidents, a Treasurer, a Secretary, a Librarian, and twelve other Members, who shall form a Council; four to constitute a quorum. ITV.—The President, Vice-Presidents, Treasurer, Secre- tary, Librarian, and Council shall be elected annually, by ballot, in the manner hereinafter mentioned. V.—The President shall be elected by the Council (subject to the approval of the Society) at the last Meeting of the Session, and take office at the ensuing Annual Meeting. VI.—The mode of election of the Vice-Presidents, Treasurer, Secretary, Librarian, and Council shall be in the form and manner following :—It shall be the duty of the retiring Council at their final meeting to suggest the names of Members to fill the offices of Vice-Presidents, Treasurer, Secretary, Librarian, and of four Members who were not XVI. LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. on the last Council to be on the Council for the ensuing session, and formally to submit to the Society, for election at the Annual Meeting, the names so suggested. The Secretary shall make out and send to each Member of the Society, with the circular convening the Annual Meeting, a printed list of the retiring Council, stating the date of the election of each Member, and the number of his atten- dances at the Council Meetings during the past session ; and another containing the names of the Members sug- gested for election, by which lists, and no others, the votes shall be taken. It shall, however, be open to any Member to substitute any other names in place of those upon the lists, sufficient space being left for that purpose. Should any list when delivered to the President contain other than the proper number of names, that list and the votes thereby given shall be absolutely void. Every list must be handed in personally by the Member at the time of voting. Vacancies occurring otherwise than by regular annual retirement shall be filled by the Council. VII.—Every Candidate for Membership shall be pro- posed by three or more Members, one of the proposers from personal knowledge. The nomination shall bé read | from the Chair at any Ordinary Meeting, and the Candi- date therein recommended shall be balloted for at the ‘succeeding Ordinary Meeting. Ten black balls shall exclude. VIII.—When a person has been elected a Member, the Secretary shall inform him thereof, by letter, and shall at the same time forward him a copy of the Laws of the Society. [X.—Every person so elected shall within one calendar month after the date of such election pay an Entrance Fee of Half a Guinea and an Annual Subscription of one LAWS. XVil. Guinea (except in the case of Student Members); but the Council shall have the power in exceptional cases, of extending the period for such payment. No Entrance Fee shall be paid on re-election by any Member who has _ paid such fee. X.—The Subscription (except in the case of Student Members) shall be One Guinea per annum, payable in advance, on the day of the Annual Meeting in October. XI.—Members may compound for their Annual Sub- scriptions by a single payment of Ten Guineas. X11.—There shall also be a class of Students Members, paying an Entrance Fee of Two Shillings and Sixpence, and a Subscription of Five Shillings per annum. XIII.—All nominations of Student Members shall be passed by the Council previous to nomination at an Ordin- ary Meeting. When elected, Student Members shall be entitled to all the privileges of Ordinary Members, except that they shall not receive the publications of the Society, nor vote at the Meetings, nor serve on the Council. XIV.—Resignation of Membership shall be signified 7 writing to the Secretary, but the Member so resigning shall be lable for the payment of his Annual Subscription, and all arrears up to date of his resignation. XV.—The Annual Meeting shall be held on the second Friday in October, or such other convenient day in the month as the Council may appoint, when a Report of the Council on the affairs of the Society, and a Balance Sheet, duly signed by the Auditors previously appointed by the Council, shall be read. XVI.—Any person (not resident within ten miles of Liverpool) eminent in Biological Science, or who may have rendered valuable services to the Society, shall be eligible XVI. LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. as an Honorary Member; but the number of such Members shall not exceed fifteen at any one time. XVII.—Captains of vessels and others contributing objects of interest shall be admissible as Associates for a period of three years, subject to re-election at the end that time. XVIII.—Such Honorory Members and Associates shall be nominated by the Council, elected by a majority at an Ordinary Meeting, and have the privilege of attending and taking part in the Meetings of the Society, but not voting. XIX.—Should there appear cause in the opinion of the Council for the expulsion from the Society of any Member, a Special General Meeting of the Society shail be called by the Council for that purpose; and if two-thirds of those voting agree that such Member be expelled, the Chairman shall declare this decision, and the name of such Member shall be erased from the books. | XX.—Every Member shall have the privilege of intro- ducing one visitor at each Ordinary Meeting. The same person shall not be admissible more than twice during the same session. XXI.—Notices of all Ordinary or Special Meetings shall be issued to each Member by the Secretary, at least three days before such Meeting. XXII.—The President, Council, or any ten Members can convene a Special General Meeting, to be called within fourteen days, by giving notice in writing to the Secretary, and stating the object of the desired Meeting. 'The circu- lar convening the Meeting must state the purpose thereof. XXTII.—Votes in all elections shall be taken by ballot, and in other cases by show of hands, unless a ballot be first demanded. LAWS. XIX. XXTV.—No alteration shall be made in these Laws, except at an Annual Meeting, or a Special Meeting called for that purpose; and notice in writing of any proposed alteration shall be given to the Council, and read at the Ordinary Meeting, at least a month previous to the meet- ing at which such alteration is to be considered, and the proposed alteration shall also be printed in the circular convening such meeting; but the Council shall have the power of enacting such Bye-Laws as may be deemed neces- sary, which Bye-Laws shall have the full power of Laws until the ensuing Annual Meeting, or a Special Meeting convened for their consideration. BYEK-LAW. Student Members of the Society may be admitted as Ordinary Members without re-election upon payment of the Ordinary Member’s Subscription; and they shall be exempt from the Ordinary Member’s entrance fee. LIST of MEMBERS of the LIVERPOOL ELECTED. 1886 1890 1886 1888 1894 1889 1887 1886 1886 1895 1890 1891 1889 1890 1894 1891 1886 BIGLOGICAL SOC ry. SHSSION 1894-95. A. ORDINARY MEMBERS. (Life Members are marked with an asterisk.) Banks, Prof. W. Mitchell; M:D., Waks@sceee Rodney-street Batters, H, A. .i., B.A., 11153.) Hele Laurels, Wormly, Herts Barron, Prof. Alexander, M.B., M.b:@iSi som Rodney-street Beasley, Henry C., Prince Albert-road, Wavertree Boyce, Prof., University College, Liverpool Brown, Prof. J. Campbell, 27, Abercromby-square Caine, Nathaniel, Spital, Bromborough Caton, R., M.D., F.R.C.P., Lea Hall, Gateaere Clubb, J: -A., B.Sc., Hon. Score TAry ies Public Museum, Liverpool | Cole, F. J., University College, Liverpool Davies, D., 55, Berkley-street Dismore, Miss, 65, Shewsbury-road, Oxton Dwerryhouse, A. R., 8, Livingstone-avenue, Sefton Park Ewart, A. J., B.Sc., 38, Berkley-street, Liverpool Forbes, H. O., LL.D., F.Z.8., Vick-PResipenm Free Public Museum, Liverpool | Garstang, W., M.A., Lincoln College, Oxford Glynn, Prof. T. R., M.D., F.R.C.P., 62, Rodney- street 1886 1891 1894 1894 1886 1887 1886 1893 1891 1894 1888 1886 1894 1895 1894 1896 1886 1893 1888 1886 1886 1888 1887 1894 LISTS OF MEMBERS. XX1. eia-en. Prot. &. J:, M.A., F.0.8., PRESIDENT, University College Goren, Prot. F.,-E.R.S., Oxford Greening, Linneus, F.L.8., 5, Wilson Patten- street, Warrington Grossmann, Karl, M.D., 70, Rodney-street Halls, W. J., 35, Lord-street Healey, George F'., 32, Croxteth-grove, Sefton Park | meroman Prof. W.,A., D.Sc.,. F.B.S., VICcH- PRESIDENT, University College Herdman, Mrs., B.Sc., 32, Bentley-road, Liverpool Hicks, J. Sibley, M.D., 2, Erskine-street Hickson, Prof. 8S. J., Owens College, Manchester *Hurst, C. H., Ph.D., 41, Stephen’s-green, Dublin Jones, Charles W., Field House, Prince Alfred- road, Wavertree Jones, Charles E., Elpie, Prenton-rd., W., B’head Wem, Rev. lu. de Beaumont, D.Sc., F.L.58., 6, Devonshire-road Lea, Rev. T. S., 8, Wellington Fields, Wavertree Laverock, W. S., M.A., B.Sc., Free Museum, Liverpool Lomas, J., Assoc.N.S.S., Salen, Amery Grove, Birkenhead Macdonald, J. S., B.A., Physiological Lab., Univ. College, Liverpool Melly, W. R., 90, Chatham-street McMillan, William $., F..5., Brook-road, Maghull Morton, G. H., F.G.8., 209, Edge-lane, HE. Newton, John, M.R.C.8., 44, Rodney-street Narramore, W., F..5S., 5, Geneva-road, Elm Park Paterson, Prof., M.D., M.R.C.S., University Col- lege, Liverpool XX; LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. 1894 Paul, Prof. F. T., Rodney-street, Liverpool 1891 Phillips, Miss F., 8, Green-lawn, Rock Ferry 1892 Phillips, E. J. M., L.D.8., M.R.C.8., Rodney-st. 1886 *Poole, Sir James, J.P., Abercromby Square 1890 Rathbone, Miss May, Backwood, Neston 1895 Ricketts, C., M.D., 1a, Cleveland-street, Birkenhead 1887 Robertson, Helenus R., Springhill, Church-road, Wavertree 1887 Ryley, Thomas C., 10, Waverley-road 1895 Sandeman, G., University College, Liverpool 1892 Sephton, Rev. J., M.A., 90, Huskisson-street 1894 Scott, Andrew, Hon. LIBRARIAN, University Col- lege, Liverpool 1895 Sherrington, Prof., M.D., F.R.S., University Col- lege, Liverpool 1886 Smith, Andrew T., Jun., 13, Bentley-road, Prince’s Park | 1895 Smith J., Rose Villa, Lachford, Warrington 1893 Tate, Francis, F.C.S., Hackins Hey, Liverpool 1886 Thompson, Isaac C., F.L.5.; FR: Miss eee TREASURER, 53, Croxteth-road — 1889 Thornely, Miss L. R., Baycliff, Woolton Hill 1888 ‘Toll, J..M., Kirby Park, Kirby 1886 Walker, Alfred O., J.P., F.L.8., Colwyn Bay 1889 Williams, Miss Leonora, Hill Top, Bradfield, nr. Sheffield 1891 Wiglesworth, J., M.D., County Asylum, Rainhill 1891 Wood, G. W., F.1.C., Riggindale-road, Streatham, London 1892 Weiss, Prof., Owens College, Manchester | 1892 Young, T. F., M.D., 12, Merton-road, Bootle B. SrupEnt MEMBERS. Armstrong, Miss A., 26, Trinity-road, Bootle LIST OF MEMBERS. XXill. Burnet, A., University College, Liverpool Crowther, H. P., University College, Liverpool Chadwick, H. C., Free Museum, Bootle Christophers, 8. R., 10, Lily-road, Fairfield Crompton, Miss C. A., University College, Liverpool Depree, 8. §., 3, Morley-road, Southport Dickinson, T., 3, Clark-street, Prince’s Park Dumergue, A. F’.,7, Montpellier-terrace, Up. Parliament-st. Dutton, J. EK., Kings-street, Rock Ferry Ewart, R. J., 33, Berkley-street, Liverpool Hannah, J. H. W., 61, Avondale-road, Sefton Park Harvey, EK. J. W., 5, Cairns-street, Liverpool Henderson, W. S., B.Sc., 2, Holley-road, Fairfield Hurter, D. G., Holly Lodge, Cressington Linton, 8. F., St. Pauls Vicarage, Clifton-road, Birkenhead Lowe, O. W. A., 4, Wexford-road, Oxton Quinby, F’. G., 11, Belvidere-road, Liverpool Simpson, A. Hope, Annandale, Sefton Park Willmer, Miss J. H., 20, Lorne-road, Oxton, Birkenhead C. HonoRARY MEMBERS. H.S.H. Albert I., Prince of Monaco, 25, Faubourg St. Honore, Paris Bornet, Dr. Edouard, Quai de la Tournelle 27, Paris Claus, Prof. Carl, University, Vienna Fritsch, Prof. Anton, Museum, Prague, Bohemia Giard, Prof. Alfred, Sorbonne, Paris Haeckel, Prof. Dr. E., University, Jena Hanitsch, R., Ph.D., Raffles Museum, Singapore Leicester, Alfred, Buckhurst Farm, nr. Edenbridge, Kent Solms-Laubach, Prof. Dr., Botan. Instit., Strassburg REPORT of the LIBRARIAN. Although no additional exchanges of publications have been arranged since the last Annual Report, the number of Societies and Institutions exchanging with us is still maintained and is the same as that given last year, viz. :—seventy-six. The following list gives the titles of the exdhanees and donations received during the session :— 1. Allgemeine Fischerei-Zeitung. Vol. XX., Nos. 10—26, Vol. XXI. Nos. 1—5. | 2. Amsterdam, Verhand. der K. Adad. van Wetenschappen (Ser. 2). Vol. IV., Nos. 1-6; Jaarboek, 1894. 3. Annaes de Sciencias Naturaes. Vol. II., Nos. 3 and 4; Vol. IIL, is@= Ik 4, Archives Neerlandaises de Sciences exactes et naturelles Vol. XXIX.. Nos. 2 and 5. 5. Australian Museum, The ; Report of the Trustees for the year 1894. 6. Bergen, Museums Aarbog, 1894-5. 7. Berlin, Math. u. natur. Mittheilungen d. k. preuss. Akademie, Nos. 3—7. 8. Berlin, Sitzungsberichte d. k. preuss. Akademie, Nos. 1—88. 9. Bihang till K. Svenska Vetenskaps—Akad. Handl. Vol. XX, Zool. pt. LV. Bor, ote Tike : 10. Bordeaux, Proces—Verbaux de la Société Linnéenne. Vol. XLYII., 1894. 11. Bulletin Scientifique de la France et de la Belgique. Vol. XXVIL., part 1. 12. Canada, Proceed. and Trans. of the Nova Scotian Institute of Science. Vol. VIII., pt. 4. 13. Canada, Bulletin Natural History Society of New Brunswick. No. 13. 14. Chili, Actes de la Société Scientifique. Vol. IV., No. 5. 15. Chili, Revista Chilena de Hijiene. Vol. I., No. 3. 16. Denmark, Oversigt over det K. Danske Vidensk. Selskabs. Forhand. 1894, No. 3; 1895, Nos. 1—4. | 17. Denmark, Oversigt over det K. Danske Vidensk. Memoires. Ser. 6. WOE MANNE A INhope ile 18. iB 27. LIBRARIAN S REPORT. XXV. Frankfurt, Senckenbergische Naturforschende Gescllacha{t. 1895. Gottingen, Nachrichten d. k. Gesellschaft d. Wissenschaften. 1895, Nos. 1—4. Japan, Journal of the College of Science, Imperial University. Vol. VIL., parts 4 and 5, Kjobenhayn, Report of the Danish Biological Station to the Home Meparment V. 1894, Vol. VIII., 2°; Vol. IX., 1. Leipzig, Berichte d. k. Gesellschaft d. Wissenschaften. 1894, No. 3; 1895, Nos. 1—4. Manchester, Microscopical Society, Transactions and Annual Report, 1894. Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, Journal, N.S. Ven tif, Vol. 1V., Nos. 1 and 2. Moscou, Bulletin de la Société Impériale des Naturalistes. 1895, Nos. 1 and 3. Museum d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, Bulletin. 1895, Nos. 1, 3, 6 ' and 8. Nancy, Builetin de la Société des Sciences. (Ser. 2), Vol. XIII., pt. 29, Nos. 4—6; 8—10; Vol. II., part 1. Napoli, Rendiconto dell Accademia dell Scienze fisiche e matematiche. (Ser. 3), Vol. 1. Natuurkundig Tijschrift voor Nederlandsch. Indie. Vol. LIV; Vol. taLSEN.S.). New Zealand Institute, Trans. and.Proceedings. Vol. XXVII., 1894. Rheinlande, Verhand. d. naturh. Vereins d. preuss. Vol. LII., part 1. Royal Microscopical Society, Journal. 1895, parts 4—6 ; 1896, part 1. Scottish Fishery Board, Annual Report. XIII. Stavanger Museum, Aarsberetning for 1894. St. Pétersbourg, Bulletin de VAccadémie Impériale des Sciences. (Ser. 5), Vol. 11., Nos. 4 and 5; Vol. III., No. 1. The Naturalist. May to December, 1895. January to April, 1896. Torino, Bollet. dei Musei di Zoologia ed Anatomia comparata delle R. Universita. Vol. X., Nos. 1983—209. United States, Bulletin of the Fish Commission. Vol. XIV., 1894. United States, Proceedings of the National Museum. No. 1018— 1032. United States, Bulletin of the National Museum. No. 39, parts J. and K., No. 48. United States, Report of the National Museum. 1898, pp. 337— 487; 587-—624; 653—663. United States, Annual Report Museum of Comparative Anatomy. 1894-95. XXVI. LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. 43. 44, 45, 46. 47. 48. 49, 50. Bl. 52. 53. Bd. BD. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. United States, Bulletin Museum of Comparative Anatomy. XXV., No. 12; XXVI., Nos. 2and15; XXVII., Nos. 1—6; XXVIIL., Now. United States, Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences, Philadelphia. Vol. III., parts 1 and 2 United States, Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History. Vol. XXVI. United States, Transactions of the Academy of Science, St. Louis. Vols. II.—V.; Vol. VI., No. 18; Vol. VII., Nos. 1—38. United States, Tufts College, Mass. Studies No. IV. Upsala, Royal Society of Sciences (Royal University). Ser. III., Vol. XV; No. 2: . Upsala, Studien tiber Nordische Actinien, 1 von Oskar Carlgren. Upsala, Studier ofver Alkaloidernas Lokalisation,—Familjen Log- aniaceae. By Marten Elfstarnd. Upsala, Anatom. System. Studier ofver Lokstammiga Oxalisarter. By Th. Fredrikson. Upsala, Den Gotlandska vegetationens iitavecklingshistoria. By Rutger Sernander. Upsala, Carl von Linné, II. By Th. M. Fries. Upsala, Naturalhistorien 1 Sverige. By Th. M. Fries. Upsala, Uber der Rhizoidenbildung. By O. Borge. Upsala, Uber Zchinorhynchus turbinella, . brevicollis, und LE. porrigens. By Ernst Borgstrom. Victoria, Proceedings of the Royal Society. Vol. VII. Wien, Verhandl. d. k. Zool-botanischen Gesellschaft. Vol. XLYV., parts 4 and 5, 8—10; Vol. XLVI., part 1. Wien, Annal. d. k. k. Naturh. Hofmuseums. Vol. IX., parts 1—4. Zurich, Vierteljahrschrift d. naturf. Gesellschaft. Vol. XL., No. 2. Zeitschrift fiir fischerei. 1895, part 6. By DONATION. The Irish Naturalist, Special Galway Conference Number. Vol. IV., No. 9., 1895. Le Laboratoire Maritime du Muséum de Paris. Par A. E. Malard. Brit. Assoc. for the Advancement of Science, Ipswich 1895, Address to the Zool. Sect. By William A. Herdman, D.Sc., F.R.S., F.L.8., F.R.S.E., Professor of Natural History in University College, Liverpool, President of the Section. The Marine Zoology, Botany, and Geology of the Irish Sea, Third Report of the Committee. On Oysters and Typhoid ; an experimental enquiry into the effect upon 84. 85. 86. LIBRARIAN'S REPORT. XXVH. the Oyster of various external conditions including Pathogenic organisms. By Professors Boyce and Herdman. Some facts and reflections drawn from a study in Budding in Compound Ascidians. By Professor W. E. Ritter, University of California. Occupation of a table at the Zoological Station, Naples. Report of the Committee. Investigations made at the Laboratory of the Marine Biological Association at Plymouth. Report of the Committee. Fauna of Liverpool Bay. Report IV. Science, N.S. Vol. II., No. 41. Nos. 62—71. Presented by Professor Herdman, F.R.S. Sur un examplaire Chilien de Pterodela pedicularia, L., & nervation doublement anormale. Par Alfred Giard, presented by the Author. Etudes sur les Fourmis les Guépes et les Abeilles 8e Note. Sur Vorgane de nettoyage tibio tarsien de Myrmica rubra, L., race Levinodis. Nyl. Neuviéme note—sur Vespa crabro, L., Histoire d’un nid depuis son origine. Onzieme note sur Vespa germanica et V. vulgaris. Dixiéme note sur Vespa media, V. silvestris et V. saxonica. Sur la Vespa crabro, L. Ponte, conservation de la chaleur dans la nid. Sur les nids de la Vespa crabro, L., ordre d’apparition des alveoles. Observations sur les Frelons. Nos. 73—80, Par Charles Janet and presented by the Author. Flora of Anglesey. Griffith. The Amphipoda of Bate and Westwood’s ‘‘ British Sessile-eyed Crustacea.” By Alfred O. Walker. Nos. 81—82. Presented by A. O. Walker, Esq., F.L.S. The Recent and Fossil Flora and Fauna of the Country around Liverpool. By G. H. Morton, F'.G.S., presented by the Author. Résultats des Campagnes Scientifiques accomplies sur son yacht. Par Albert 1°° Souverain de Monaco. Fasc. VIII. Zonthaires provenant des campagnes du yacht |’Hirondelle. Par E. Jowdan. Fase. I. Contribution l’etude des Céphalopoda de l’atlantique Nord. Par Louis Joubin. Presented by H.S.H. the Prince of Monaco. Some.recent evidence in favour of Impact. By A. W. Bickerton. Copy of letters sent to ‘‘ Nature” on Partial Impact. By Professor Bickerton. XXVlll. . LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. List of Societies, etc., with which publications are exchanged. AMSTERDAM. —Koninlijke Akadamie van Wettenschappen. Koninklijke Zodlogisch Genootschap Natura Artis Magistra. BaLtimoRE.—Johns Hopkins University. Batayvia.—Koninklijke Natuurkundig Vereeniging in Ned. Indie. BERGEN.—Museum. Beruin.—Konigl. Akademie der Wissenschaften. Deutscher Fischerei- Vereins. BIRMINGHAM.—Philosophical Society. BoLtonea.—Accademia delle Scienze. Bonn.—Naturhistorischer verein des Preussichen Rheinlande und West- falens. BorDEAUX.—Société Linnéenne. Bosron.—Society of Natural History. BrussELLsS.—Académie Royal des Sciences, etc., et Belgique. CAMBRIDGE.—Morphological Laboratories. CAMBRIDGE, Mass.—Museum of Comparative Zoology of Harvard College. CunristiaANiA.—Videnskabs-Selskabet. DuBLin.—Royal Dublin Society. EpInBuRGH—Royal Society. Royal Physical Society. Royal College of Physicians. Fishery Board for Scotland. | FRANKFuURY.—Senckenbergische Naturforschende Gesellschaft. Frripurce.—Naturforschende Gesellschaft. GENEVE.—Societé de Physique et d’Histoire Naturelle. Gussun.—Oberhessische Gesellschaft fiir Natur nnd Heilkunde. GLAscow.—Natural History Society. Gorrincen.—Konigl. Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften. Hatirax.—Nova Scotian Institute of Natural Science. Han_temM.—-Musée Teyler. Societé Hollandaise des Sciences. Kiel.—Naturwissenschaftlichen vereins fur Schleswig—Holstein. KsoBENHAVN.—Naturhistorike Forening. Danish Biological Station, (C. G. John Petersen). Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab. Lrrps.—Yorkshire Naturalists Union. Lerpzia.—Konigl. Sachs. Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften. Litir.—Revue Biologique du Nord de la France. Lonpon.—Royal Microscopical Society. British Museum (Natural History Department). LIBRARIAN ’S REPORT. O40 _ MAncuEsTER.—Microscopical Society. be Owens College. - MARSEILLE.—Station Zoologique d’Endoume. q Musée d’Histoire Naturelle. -MAssAcuuserts.—Tufts College Library. _ MECKLENBURG.—Vereins der Freunde der Naturgeschichte. _ MELBOURNE.—Rovyal Society of Victoria. -MonrTrPeviier.—Académie des Seiences et Lettres. _ Moscov.—Société Impériale des Naturalistes. WNancy.—Sociéte des Sciences. Napoui.—Accademia delle Scienze Fisiche e Matematiche. New Bruyswicx.—Natural History Society. - Ovorto.—Annaes de Sciencias Naturaes. _ Paris.—Museum d'Histoire Naturelle. Société Zoologique de France. Bulletin Scientifique de la France et de la Belgique. PHILADELPHIA.—Academy of Natural Sciences. _ PiymovrH.—Marine Biological Association. ‘Sr. Lovis, Miss.—Academy of Science. Sr. Pererspurc.—Académie Impériale des Sciences. SANTIAGO.—Société Scientifiq du Chili. STAVANGER.—Stavanger Museum. SrockHoLM.-—Académie Royale des Sciences. _SypNnry.—Australian Museum. _ Toxro.—Imperial University. Torino.—Musei de Zoologia ed Anatomia Cemparata della R. Universita. Toronto.—Canadian Institute. TrizsTEe.—Societa Adriatica de Sceinze Naturali. q Upsata.-—Upsala Universitiet. _ WASsHINGTON.—Smithsonian Institution. United States National Museum. United States Commission of Fish and Fisheries. WELLINGTON, N.Z.—New Zealand Institute. Wiey.—kK. K. Naturhistorischen Hofmuseums. ; K. K. Zoologisch—Botanischen Gesellschaft. Zoricu.—Zurcher Naturforschende Gesellschaft. ss ss PHE LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Dr. In Accounr wirH ISAAC C. THOMPSON, Hon. Treasurer. Cr. 1896. £8. a. 1896. & is... To Use of Rooms, University College ............. ime we or 20 By Balance, 30th September, 1895............00.000e.. 65 7 2 », Lea and Attendances at Meetings ......... heer roo weleenG »» / Members’ Entrance Hees at 10/6,..........:..0..... 818 6 », Printing and Stationery— 7p OLUdenb Membersy Hecseat 2/Gm,.,amekeoicmnee em OMncn at OE Dole oe (Corns eeue sisaienNis enero oe Soe atietieea Sota 62 19 0 ,, 64 Members’ Subscriptions at 21/-..............0.0.. 67 4 0 IBA RONWAN Seat aac sence Snore Age eee Pe aangelit a ee Lee O ,, 13 Student Members’ Subscriptions at 5/-............ 8 5 0 Pet Vy eulamnsle ya Gis Ga cass encesaacctan ect eaten ceer wm 20-38" 50 5p Wale Ol PrOCeedin gas, nan mca on atuuctan edit asian ese OMS MO mlutouanys BOOMs Cas@rvctacells sommes iccenouvhiesdoeite Leptin: | Bom OS SO | _ », Postage and Carriage of Vols., &c., Hon. Librarian 6 9 10 a Ae LOMAS CCE raah ernie voscmenenrde:s BEY ers oid S80) 4 = - Hons) UPedsy..cvce crs: BR fa Bae Rese ee OP ton £0 », Balance in hand, September 30th, 1896...... Riana ae Doma 24! £146 4 6 £146 4 6 By Balance in hands of Treasurer......... ............. £55138 4 ISAAC C. THOMPSON, Hon. TREASURER. LIVERPOOL, September 30th, 1896. Audited and found correct, 7 . A. T. SMITH, Junr. Als = fy ~ : D4) a. TRANSACTIONS OF THE LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS ON BOTANIC GARDENS—PAST AND PRESENT. BY R. J. Harvey Gisson, M.A., F.L.S., ; PROFESSOR OF BOTANY IN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, LIVERPOOL. My first duty is to thank you formally but none the less sincerely, for the honour you have done me in electing me to fill the presidential chair of the Liverpool Biological Society. I thank you not only for the honour you have done me as an individual but for your implied recognition of the importance of the science which I represent in this College. I need hardly say that it shall be my constant endeavour to fulfil to your satisfaction the duties devolving on your President, and I confidently look for your interest and cooperation in aiding me to maintain the high standard of work which this Society has always aimed at under the guidance of the distinguished biologists who have preceded me in the occupancy of this chair. Our meetings, I take it, have two important functions to fulfil, the one to awaken in others and to stimulate in ourselves interest in the science of Biology, the other to advance that science by original investigation and research. Whilst frankly acknowledging the necessity for endeavouring to render our meetings as generally attractive and interesting as possible, I believe that we would be taking a distinctly retrogressive step were we to permit any such aim to obscure the wider and more important purpose of our Society, viz., to attempt, however feebly, still conscientiously, to elucidate some y TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. problem or add some fact to our knowledge of living organisms, by original contributions to biological literature. Probably the greatest scientific work of the incoming century will be done not so much within the realm of one particular science as on the borderland where two or more sciences meet. That research is steadily tending in this direction is becoming more evident day by day. . Recognising this trend in scientific research, we as a society may, it seems to me, considerably expand our own stock of conceptions and ideas by occasional joint discussions with the devotees of allied sciences on subjects of mutual interest. An initiative was taken in this direction last session when the Physical Society united with us in a consideration of certain problems connected with the physiology of the organ of hearing. I trust it may be possible during the present session to arrange a joint meeting with some other scientific society whose sphere of work to some extent may overlap that in which we biologists labour. : Again, I believe that it is beneficial to the welfare of our Society that we should occasionally go outside our own circle of members and invite some distinguished biologist to address us on a subject which he has made specially his own. On several occasions in past years we have had the pleasure of listening to such addresses, and the meetings at which we have been so favoured have been amongst the most successful of any we have held. I am hopeful that the precedent so established may be again acted upon during the year of my presidency. I would repeat, however, that in my opinion neither of these methods of quickening public interest in Biology must be allowed to obscure our main object and aim, viz., the production of original research and the publication of our yearly volume of Transactions, which I am proud to PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS. 3 to think have already won the approbation of biologists both in Europe and America. It is fortunate for me that your President is permitted some latitude in his choice of a subject on which to address you, and some freedom in his method of treatment of it. I could scarcely hope to interest you in the detailed anatomical researches to which I have devoted what little time I can spare from professorial duties; on any other subject I must perforce speak at second hand. I would beg your forbearance, therefore, if I venture to offer you a necessarily brief historical and descriptive account of some of the great botanical gardens of the world, and endeavour to shew you how the idea of a botanic garden first arose in the minds of the medieval botanists and thereafter became concrete in the continent of Hurope and in our own country. I trust that some, at least, of the remarks I have to make may be new to you, and if I fail to make the subject interesting you will I hope lay the blame on the teller not on the story. It requires no great powers of observation and of reasoning to enable us to classify gardens as either useful, ornamental or scientific. Not that a scientific garden is not or cannot be ornamental and even economically useful, or a useful garden at once scientific and ornamental, but simply that in planning out a garden we are accustomed to consider primarily whether it is to aim at being a decorative appendage to a house or a city, an area set a- part for the cultivation of pot herbs or a living museum for study and research. Scientific or Botanic Gardens proper have for their chief purpose the advancement of the science of Botany, are therefore just as old as the science itself and naturally have developed pari passu with it. An outline knowledge of the history of Botany will obviously aid us greatly in understanding the devel- i i ; o.oo 4 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. | opmental stages through which the botanic garden has — passed. It would be quite beside my purpose to refer even in brief to the botanical writings of the Ancients. The names of Aristotle, Theophrastus and Dioscorides are perhaps those most familiarly associated with the early history of Botany, although the classical scholar is not unacquainted with the contributions to knowledge of plant lore of such writers as Kmpedocles, Anaxagoras, Apollodorus, Democritus and the numerous writers on agricultural topics down to the times of Vergil and Pliny. A gap of several centuries follows destitute of a single botanical publication of note until we reach the 14th and 15th centuries when we meet with the records left us by the early herbalists. Even at the best a herbal of that time was little more than a catalogue of plants used in pharmacy—a list of simplicia from which the first dispen- sers compounded their drugs. Indeed as Sachs puts it “the chief object of the earlier herbalists was to rediscover the plants employed in medicine by the physicians of antiquity, and, if possible, to identify in the west the plants mentioned as of medicinal value by the Greeks.” _The later herbalists aimed at something higher. They rightly relinquished the study of classic texts for the study ‘ of nature, and contented themselves with recording as accurately as possible the external configuration of the plants growing in or near the districts in which they resided. It is true again that their labours resulted in a series of descriptive and illustrated catalogues with little or no pretence at systematic arrangement of subject matter. They confined themselves to diagnosing and illustrating individual form and to enumerating real or supposed medicinal virtues. : From a knowledge of the history of science in general © PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS. 5 one learns to expect that along patient and apparently purposeless accumulation of data often finds at last its justification and its fulfilment in the sudden and brilliant discovery of one or more grand natural laws. It is somewhat remarkable therefore that the idea of natural affinity arose only incidentally in the process of cataloguing and describing plants and was, even by those who first felt it, looked upon as of quite secondary importance. Almost, one might say without conscious intention, but yet, as we now see, by a very natural association of ideas, the writers of the later herbals, for instance Bock, Fuchs, and Brunfels, described successively plants which had an - obvious family likeness to each other. A most important step was thus gained and one which led quite easily and naturally to the deliberate subordination of the question of pharmaceutical utility and to the elevation to first rank of the study of plant relationship and of the morphological features on which that principle was based. To Kaspar Bauhin belongs the credit of first clearly recognising this principle and of emphasising it in his works. To this botanist and not to Linnaeus we are indebted for the first appreciation of the value of generic and specific names: he it was who first made use of the binary system of nomenclature in describing living objects. Grotesque as his classification may seem to students of these later days, still in Bauhin’s Pinax and in the Prodromus Theatri Botanici we meet for the first time an attempt at grouping plants in accordance with natural affinity, not merely at cataloguing in alphabetical order. Bauhin was born at Bale in 1550 and died in 1624, and the period of his life may be said to include the date of the nativity of Botany as a Science. Another great name of the 16th Century that stands out preeminently is that of Andraea Caesalpino, Professor 6 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY, of Botany in the University of Pisa. Not content with mere analysis and observation, Caesalpino brought to the study of plants an intimate acquaintance with Aristotelian philosophy, and his works teem with theoretical discuss- ions on the seat of the soul in plants, the doctrine of metamorphosis and such like products of scholasticism. His classification is based not upon deduction from observed natural phenomena but on philosophic abstrac- tion and reasoning on the nature of plants, and the relative value of their various parts. In this respect Caesalpino sounded a theme on which his successors played variations for more than a hundred years until Linnaeus brought the concerto to a finale in the Systema Nature. — In justice to Linnaeus one must bear in mind that he himself proposed his artificial system avowedly as pyro- visional; that that system should have been obstinately not to say pugnaciously adhered to by his followers for well nigh a century after its illustrious author had passed away, and that his own suggestive speculations as to the true principles of classification, given to the world in the Philosophia Botamca, should have been almostly completely ignored, is due to the blind reverence with which his disciples regarded one who had accomplished what we must recognise as a colossal task. Long before the second revival of Botany, which took | place at the beginning of the 18th century, travellers like Clusius and Albini had lifted the veil from a new world of plant life, and anatomists like Malpighi and Grew, with their new found microscopes were endeavouring to unravel the mysterious histological complex that these instruments — revealed not only in the phanerogamic world but in the hitherto untrodden field of cryptogamic Botany, wherein Micheli and Dillenius stand out prominently as pioneers. The last days of the 17th and early days of the 18th —. PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS. t century were noteworthy for yet another development— the birth of vegetable physiology which dates from . Kélreuter and Sprengel’s observations and experiments on fertilisation and Stephen Hale’s classic labours on the movements of sap. The De Jussieus and later the De Candolles inaugurated a new epoch in systematic Botany by the publication of their natural systems of taxonomy, based on the essential principle that natural affinities are not to be determined by any one character but by the sum of all, whilst the developmental and physiological methods were further emphasised by the publication in 1842 of Schleiden’s Principles of Botany wherein the modern standpoint is at last clearly enunciated and defined. With the acceptance by botanists of these principles we reach comparatively recent times, for the next ereat names that meet us are those so familiar to the botanical student of to-day. Botany then, as an organised study of the structure, functions and mutual relationships of plants had Medicine and Pharmacy for its parents, although I fear its parents are nowadays rather inclined to ignore their offspring. The search for simples amongst the herbs of the field resulted in the discovery of a great Science; the need for the study of those simples brought about the foundation of gardens to which the ancient apothecary might have ready access and from which he might conveniently obtain the particular drug he required. The finds of travellers involved successive extensions in the superficial area of the gardens, and the birth of the new interest in plants for their own sake revolutionised their arrangement. — Microscopic and experimental research demanded labora- tories in which the student might explore the minute structure of plants or attempt to solve the thousand and one problems in vegetable physiology, whilst the growth 8 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. of popular interests and the necessities of international commerce encouraged the foundation of museums of Economic Botany. In short all the progressive phases in the development of the Science of Botany had their concrete counterparts in the evolution of the Physic Garden of the 15th century into the scientific Botanic Garden of the 19th. In the time that is placed at my disposal this evening I desire to give you some notion of this progressive development and to describe to you a few illustrative examples of the Physic Gardens of the Herbal period, of. the Botanic Gardens of the 17th and 18th centuries and finally of the modern Botanic Gardens both in our own country and abroad. It is not necessary for my present purpose to do more ; than name some of the gardens of classical times. I do not refer of course to the numberless private gardens _attached to the palaces and villas of the Greek and Roman nobles, but to the public gardens, records of which have come down to us in the classics. Amongst these perhaps the most famous are the gardens of Theophrastus at Athens, and of Ptolemy Philadelphus at Alexandria, of King Attalus at Pergamos, and the gardens of Carthage. We read also of a medicinal garden belonging to Antonius Castor at Rome, perhaps the first of its kind, and Vergil, Martial and other Latin writers frequently refer to gardens devoted to the culture of the vegetable delicacies most fancied by the palates of the Roman epicures. In the early middle ages the various monkish orders were, as every one knows, the custodians of the degenerate knowledge and practice of medicine transmitted from the later Latin authors, until the quaint mixture of ancient science and medieval black art was at last superseded by the Benedictines, whose academy at Monte Cassino in PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS. 9 Campania, was the seat of the revival of the art of healing founded by Hippocrates and Galen. The Civitas Hippocratica as it was called, was a non-religious establish- ment, where law and philosophy, but especially medicine, were taught, and to which came students from all parts of the then known world. In connection with this Institution we find records of a Physic Garden founded in 1309 by a certain Matthaeus Sylvaticus and in 1333 we read of another Medicinal Garden established by the famous Venetian Doctor Gualterus on an area given him by the Republic “ pro faciendo hortum pro herbis necessariis artis suse.” Data are more abundant for dealing with the history of the University Gardens of the 16th century and to these Wwe may now turn. Whilst Fuchs and Brunfels were endeavouring to weed out the rank growths that had been assiduously cherished by the earlier herbalists, Francesco Buonafede, the first professor of Botany in the first university in Europe, that that of Padua, obtained from the Senate of Venice in 1545 a grant of land for the establishment of a medicinal garden. That garden exists to the present day, and occupies the same (though now greatly extended) site eranted in the 16th century by the enlightened Signiory. The foundation of the physic garden of Padua was the signal for the establishment of gardens in several other Italian cities, and in quick succession we read of gardens laid out at Pisa in 1547, at Florence in 1550, at Rome in 1566, and at Bologna in 1567. It is impossible for me in the time at my disposal to describe to you even briefly the history of these and of many other Italian gardens founded at a later date. It must suffice merely to note that the example of the Italian States was soon followed in Northern and Western Europe, and before the end of ‘10 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. the century the great gardens of Leyden and Montpellier had been founded. | Just as the travels of Lusitanus, Calceolari, Ghini, Aldrovandi and others materially aided the extention and enlargement of the gardens of Padua, Pisa and Bologna, so in the north, through the efforts of Dodonaeus, Lobe- hus and Clusius a medicinal garden was in 1577 founded in connection with the famous university of Leyden at the expense of the Municipal Council of the city. If Padua, Pisa and Bologna were the great botanical schools of the east, as Leyden was that of the north, Montpellier claimed the premier place in the west. The names of the renowned botanists Fuchs, Gesner, Clusius, -Lobelius and Bauhin appear on its list of students although it did not succeed in retaining them amongst its teachers. The new and already famous gardens of the northern and eastern universities drew away the cream of the botanical students from its halls. Montpellier could not afford to be behind hand: it must needs have a botanical garden also, and so there came into existence in 1596 a garden destined to eclipse even the most famous _ of its predecessors in Holland and Italy. For this reason I have selected it for fuller description. Its founder was . Pierre Richer de Belleval, a native of Picardy and graduate of Montpellier University. At his instigation the Parlia- ment of Languedoc granted permission and land to found a garden in connection with the medical faculty of the University. Belleval’s chief aim, as he himself states, was to cultivate plants both native and exotic, under conditions ‘ similar to those of nature. He says, ‘‘J’al exécuté vos ~ordres et fondé sous le nom de Jardin royal, un établisse- “ment digne d’un grand empire. . II est divisé en plusieurs parties présentant chacune une exposition différente; un -monticule offre deux .versants tournés lun vers le Sud, PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS. | V1 Vautre versle Nord. I] ya des lieux escarpés, des rochers, des sables exposés au soleil, d’autres ombragés, humides, inondés, ou d’un sol fertile; on y trouve des buissons, des mares, des marais, dans lesquels les végetaux herbacés, les sous-arbrisseaux et les arbres prospérent admirablement.”’ (Onomatologia, Pref. 1598). The main gateway of the garden led into an avenue of laurels, to the north of which lay the medical garden with the following inscription over the entrance: PLANTA QUARUM IN MEDICINA HIS TEMPORIBUS MAXIME USUS EST. The pharmaceutical collections were arranged in rows in alphabetical order. North of the medicinal garden came a six-tiered hill. The lowest tiers facing the south were occupied by PLANTA ODORATA VENENAT# UMBELLIFERAE SPINOSH CATHARTICA SCANDENTES ALIIS INNIX#; the north side of the mound by PLANTA QU IN ASPERIS SAXOSIS APRICIS ET IN IPSO LITTORE NASCUNTUR, whilst on the top were grown PLANTA QU IN CLIVIS MONTIBUS FRUTETIS DUMETIS ET SABULOSIS ADOLESCUNT. Over the chief gate was engraved the arms of France and the name LE JARDIN DU Roy, 1596; whilst underneath was a rather more poetic and classic rendering of our “ visitors are requested not to touch’—HIc ARGUS ESTO NON BRIAREUS. The plate, I ought to add, represents only part of the garden. In describing it Belleval says, ‘‘ Le Jardin du Roi était coupé en dieux parties; l’une appelée le Jardin médical, l’autre la pépiniére ; la premiére était destinée aux démonstrations des plantes et consacrée a 1 Université; lautre était rempie des plantes étrangtres, qui, pour la plupart, étaient montagneuses, destinées plutot a la curiosité qu’a la nécessité, afin que ceux qui accouraient des provinces et des nations étrangéres, y reconnussent leurs richesses.”’ A herbarium and_ audi- torium, with a dedication to Henry of Navarre, occupied the extreme north eastern corner of the garden, 12 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. The gardens of Montpellier created a great sensation among the botanists of the time, all of whom speak of it in terms of the highest admiration. Despite lack of funds Belleval added rapidly to the contents of his garden, devoting special attention to the collection of local plants. The siege of Montpellier in 1622 inflicted great damage on the garden, but the courageous founder did not lose heart. No sooner had he seen the last of the troops than he set to work again and in his labours was successful in interesting the great Richelieu. He had scarcely com- pleted the renovations necessary when he died in 1682. It will be unnecessary for me to describe in detail the gradual progress of the garden during the century following the death of Belleval. The arrangement of the plants had been twice changed, once to conform to the system of Tournefort, and again to bring 1t into conformity with the artificial system of Linnaeus. The beginning of the 19th Century saw the garden under the direction of the famous A. P. de Candolle, and his election to the directorate was followed by an entire rearrangement on the principles of the natural system of classification now so well known and universally followed. De Candolle added an arboretum and greenhouses and in many other ways extended the scientific usefulness of the gardens. His reign at Montpellier lasted only 6 years, for in 1816 he was appointed to the chair of Botany in Geneva, where he spent the remainder of his life. A word finally as to the present condition of the contin It includes about 45,000 sq. metres divided into three regions ; first, to the south, a triangular region devoted to the uses of the School of Medicine, a median oblong (the mount of Belleval’s time), and a northern area irregular in outline added to the garden as an arboretum in De Candolles time. Between the systematic garden and the we oe sel a ee _ PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS. See 13- ~ mound (which bears a miscellaneous collection of trees and shrubs) is the orangery and a line of greenhouses for temperate plants. ‘The northern area includes an acclimatisation garden and an area devoted to the culture of fruit trees and plants used in the arts. The extreme north is occupied by the necessary store houses and out- buildings, the museum, library, &c. _ The decade which saw the foundation of the Montpellier gardens saw also the establishment of gardens in con- nection with the Universities of Heidelberg, Leipzig and Breslau. In 1597 Paris followed suit. The story goes that the now famous Jardin des Plantes was primarily established with the intention of investigating _ what variations were possible in the style of the bouquets worn at the Royal Court—truly a noble piece of research! lts first claim to be considered as a botanic garden was not made until about 1630 when professorships of Botany and Pharmacology were instituted. Strassburg in 1619, Jena in 1629, Oxford in 1632, Messina in 1638, Chelsea in 1677, Edinburgh in 1680 and Berlin in 1714 are the next examples of note. As the Physic Garden at Chelsea has the honour of being the first and oldest botanic garden in Great Britain, perhaps I may select it for more than mere mention. Itis true that Gerard, the author _ of the famous Herbal, is said to -have had a private medi- cinal garden attached to his house in Holborn, and also Tradescant, gardener to James I., and after whom the well known Tradescantia has been named, cultivated exotics in a garden situated where S. Lambeth now stands, still as a public garden that of Chelsea is un- { doubtedly entitled to priority. The immediate founders ~ of the Chelsa Gardens were the members of the Society of Apothecaries who now for over two centuries have maintained it solely for the advancement of the science 14 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. of Botany. The name ‘‘ Physic Garden” by which it was for long known was to a certain extent a misnomer. Medicinal plants were certainly cultivated in it but in the deed of gift by Sir Hans Sloane the growing of plants for pharmaceutical trade purposes is expressly forbidden. The history of the first beginings of the Chelsea Gardens sounds rather paltry not to say ridiculous after one has studied the story of the foundation of the gardens of Padua and Montpellier. We read that the ground on which the Chelsea Garden is now laid out was originally taken by the Apothecaries Society as a spot on which to build a convenient barge house for the ornamental barge which the society (like other city companies) then possessed. This plot of ground was walled round in 1674, and four years later appears to have been planted with fruit trees and herbs for the use of the Apothecaries’ laboratory. A — ereenhouse and stove were added shortly afterwards and the Society then began to exchange plants with the gardens of the University of Leyden. The purchase of the estate by Dr. (afterwards Sir Hans) Sloane in 1712 at once brought about a change for the better in the prospects of the Chelsea establishment. Sloane was a scientist of no mean rank—a pupil of the chemist Stahl and of the botanist Tournefort and further a friend of Ray, the father of English Botany. His scientific achievements won for him the presidency of the Royal Society in succession to Sir Isaac Newton. His enthusiastic love for science in general and for Botany in particular led him to readily accede to the request of the Apothecaries Society for liberal treatment with regard to the conditions of tenure of the garden now included within his estate, and in 1722 Sloane generously handed over to them the ground—an area of over three acres—on condition, how- ever, that the Society paid an annual rent of £5, and PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS. yer 15 rendered yearly to the Royal Society 50 species of distinct plants, well dried, preserved and named, which had been erown in the garden that same year—those presented in each year to be specifically different from those of every former year, until 2000 had been delivered. One gets a fairly good idea of the contents of the Chelsea Garden at this time from the Catalogue published in 1730 by Miller, the then chief gardener. The plants were classified into herbs and under shrubs, shrubs and trees each section being arranged alphabetically. Four hundred and ninety nine plants in all are named and are chiefly those which were employed in the pharmaceutical preparations of that day. Hothouses for the cultivation of exotics were opened in 1732. Four years later Linn- aeus visited the garden, and no doubt his interest in it did much towards hastening the introduction of the Linnaean method into the systematic arrangement of the plants in the gardens. Amongst the directors of Chelsea Garden appear the names of some of the foremost of our English botanists—Sherard, whose generosity established the Sherardian professorship at Oxford—Hudson, the author of the Flora Anglica—Curtis, the editor of the familiar Botanical Magazine, and Lindley, whose contyri- butions to systematic Botany and to Taxonomy are too well known to need enumeration. The gardens are now more of historic than of scientific importance, being dwarfed into insignificance by the great, but comparatively modern, establishment at Kew. It now covers about four acres along the Chelsea embank- ment. The centre is occupied by the statue of Sir Hans Sloane; the upper part of the garden contains the col- lection of medicinal plants, whilst towards the river are arranged beds of hardy herbaceous plants in natural orders, with trees and shrubs interspersed, the remains of 16. TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. former plantings. The houses occupy the north west end. A few years before the foundation of the Chelsea Garden that more especially associated with the name of Linnaeus came into being. Considering the enormous influence this famous man had on Botany, a brief account of the garden at Upsala may not be without interest. Although founded by Rudbeck in 1660 it was not until 1742 that the Upsala garden came under the direction of Linnaeus. An old pamphlet dated 1745 published by his authority — gives an account of the gardens at that date. You will be able to obtain some notion of their character from the photo of the plate which illustrates this work. The garden was in the form of an oblong. The northern end was lined with greenhouses—cool, temperate and hot. To the right of this range was an “‘ area vernalis”’ to the left an ‘‘area autumnalis”’ and immediately in front an ‘‘area meridionalis.”” In the middle of the garden were three aquaria for marsh, lake and river plants respectively. The remainder of the space was occupied by two great sets of beds, that to the right for annuals, that to the left for perennials, whilst to the south were further ornamental flower beds, the houses of the ue ee the museum, library and so on. -Itis worth pausing to note at aie point that whilst, as we have already seen, the first Italian Gardens were avowedly purely medicinal, that of Montpellier was a compromise. Although laid out primarily for the cultivation of medicinal herbs, it was not purely and exclusively pharmaceutical. Im accordance with Belleval’s scheme a portion of the space alloted to him was designed to accommodate plants not necessarily medicinally useful and arranged according to their habit, rock, aquatic, marsh loving, and so on as the case might be. Here in the Upsala garden the specially pharmaceutical purpose is ignored and the beds PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS. iy’ are laid out entirely to suit the botanical character of the plant, and in accordance with its natural habit and in no respect with its usefulness to man. These three historic gardens Padua, Montpellier and Upsala, may indeed be taken as illustrating three great stages in the evolution not only of the botanic garden itself but also of the science of Botany. Established first of all in Italy as a living herbal, as a concrete illustration of Medicinal Botany, the garden reflected in itself the birth of the science when it became planned, as at Montpellier, partly on utilitarian, partly on physiological lines, and becomes finally in Upsala a purely educational establishment conceived and carried out in accordance with scientific principles. To attempt to follow the history or even enumerate the botanical gardens founded in other cities in the end of the last and the beginning of this century, and to trace how the hard and formal scientific conception of a botanic garden became artistically modified and softened, would lead me far beyond the limits of time which your courtesy erants me. Merely as an illustration, however, of the rapidity with which the number of gardens increased during the period of which I speak, I may mention that in Italy alone gardens were founded in Turin in 1729, in Pavia and Caghariin 1765, in Parma in 1770, in Modena in 1772, in Palermo in 1779, in Mantua in 1780, in Milan in 1781, in Siena in 1784, in Naples in 1796, in Genoa in 1803 and in Venice in 1810. And again as exemplifying the influence of the development of the artistic sense in the laying out of gardens I may ask you to contrast a photograph of the gardens of Madrid in 1781 with one which represents the same garden one hundred years later. The rectangular beds and geometrically arranged paths of the former give place to irregular figures in the ground plan of the latter; whilst even in the areas where 18 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIULOGICAL SOCIETY. the original ground plan has been retained the angularities have been rubbed off and a curved pathway replaces the primitive straight and formal walk. You will be able more fully to appreciate this feature in the evolution of the garden when we come to contrast modern gardens such as these of Kew, Buitenzorg and S. Louis with those of last century. I desire now to turn for a few moments to the present day and attempt briefly to indicate to you the chief characteristics of some of the great gardens of our own times. , , I have already more than once suggested to you that the botanic garden of any given period more or less reflects the condition of the science at that time. I say more or less, because science is continually progressive and botanical science more especially has, within the last fifty years advanced comparatively more rapidly than any other branch. It would be practically impossible, however, to make corresponding changes in the systematic arrange- ment of a garden to bring it, so to speak, up to date with the most recent research. Many no doubt extremely important investigations lead to suggestions in Taxonomy which would if followed out in practice involve enormous labour and expense. Sometimes these researches are confirmed and universally accepted and by and by they may become recognised concretely, one might say, in laboratory teaching, in museum classification and in garden arrangement. Sometimes they are not so con- formed and recognised, and if the alterations in arrange- ment involved by their acceptance have not be carried out, there isno harm done. Imagine on the other hand the trouble and outlay rendered necessary by the renaming of the phanerograms in Kew Gardens in accordance with the views let us say of Otto Kunze, assuming that that ardent PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS. | 19 reformer’s views were to receive wide acceptance, or in the transposition of even a small family of herbaceous plants from one region of the garden to another in consequence of the publication of some monograph pronouncing, even authoritatively, on its affinities. The Linnean arrange- ment has of course been given up in every modern botanical garden and the natural system is to all intents and purposes universally followed. But there the similarity between gardens ends. In the first place there are in _ the botanic gardens in different parts of the world the necessarily different. climatic and other conditions to be considered. Plants which need stove heat in Kew erow in the open air in Rio de Janeiro or Buitenzorg ; plants which in our northern latitudes can be cultivated with success in open beds must be tended in frigidaria in the tropics, if they be grown at all. Moreover no two gardens, even in the same district, are quite alike. In - some the principles of geographical distribution are taken as the guide in planning the garden; in others a purely systematic and taxonomic basis is selected, in others again the physiological habit, whilst others combine all three. The best gardens are those which enable the visitor to learn not only systematic or geographical or physiological botany but all of these, which are provided with museums and beds of economic and medicinal plants, with herbarium, library, and last, but byno means least, with laboratories, where in short all the manifold developments of the science during the last fifty years are represented and allowed for. ‘here are several such gardens now in existence: time permits me to describe three only, the Missouri Garden at St. Louis, the ’s Lands Plantentuin of Buitenzorg, Java, and the Royal Gardens, Kew. With regard to the botanic gardens in the States I am indebted for much information to Mr. Coville of the U.S. 20 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Department of Agriculture. He informs me that at the present time there are in the States but three establish- ments that can justly be regarded as botanical gardens in the strictest sense of the term. ‘The first and the largest is the Missouri Garden at S. Louis, the second the Arnold Arboretum of Brookline, Mass., and thirdly the Botanic Garden at Harvard University. Another Botanic Garden Mr. Coville tells me is on the point of being established at New York City by combination of private endowment with a grant of money and land from the city itself. In the earlier history of the country there were several private gardens, such as Bartram’s at Philadelphia, which is still in existence, but these cannot really be classed with the modern article. In Washington there has existed for many years a botanical garden which, however, while it contained some important and interesting collections on certain lines, has made no pretence at being a true botanic garden, and in fact has been devoted principally to — ornamental purposes. The Department of Agriculture has a similar, though less complete, collection of trees and shrubs with a few herbaceous plants, and, taken in connection with the city parks, furnishes a fairly good representation of the possibilities of Washington as a centre for plant cultivation. In addition, the majority of the Colleges and Universities of the States have in connection with their botanical departments, gardens of greater or lesser extent, e.g., those of the State of Nebraska and of Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. The University of California has made a beginning in this direction which is likely with proper pncolrag a as to develop into an important establishment. Tn Canada also, Montreal established a botanic garden in 1886, with an area of 75 acres, chiefly at the instigation of the McGill College and the Horticultural Society of Montreal. PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS. 21 Henry Shaw, the founder of the great Missouri Garden and of the Shaw School of Botany, was in his early life a Sheffield cutler. He migrated to the States in 1819 and by his energy and ability ere long amassed a large fortune and retired from business whilst still in the prime of life. During a visit to the old country, in the year of the 1851 Exhibition, he spent some time in examining the more notable private gardens in England, and according to his own statement it was while walking though the grounds of Chatsworth that the idea first occurred to him to lay out a private garden in his own city of 8. Louis on similar but less ambitious lines. In 1857 the Missouri Gardens were first planned on suggestions furnished him by Engelmann, Hooker, Decaisne, Alexander Braun, and other great botanists whose opinions he invited. In 1859 Shaw, at Hooker’s advice, purchased the great herbarium of Professor Bernhardi of Erfurth and for the remainder of his hfe, indeed up to the day of his death in 1889, the garden which he had created, in the midst of which he lived and in which he now lies buried, was his constant care. From the general plan of the garden you will readily understand the principle on which it is laid out. With the arboretum it forms a right angled triangle about 45 acres in extent, not including the adjoinmg meadows, which latter, though at present let, are to remain available for further extension of the gardens. The Shaw School of Botany, situated close at hand was also founded by Shaw and endowed with £1000 a year, and capital yielding a like sum was devoted to the support of a special Professor of Botany in the School, the professor being also director of the Garden. In addition to the green-houses, store-houses, and palm-house, and necessary out-buildings, a large herbarium and museum 22. TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. are situated within the grounds, as is also a lodge for the _ benefit of a number of ‘‘ garden pupils’’ who are supported by funds left for the purpose and who are trained as scientific gardeners and foresters. 'The Shaw School itself has laboratories, museum and herbarium, and in the school some remarkably good work has been already accomplished, both morphological and systematic. Elaborate in its detail and complete in its equipment as the 8. Louis Garden is, it is quite eclipsed by the great tropical garden of Buitenzorg in Java, a garden which, under its distinguished director Dr. Treub, has, during the comparatively short period of its existence, done as much for the Science of Botany as any other garden in the world. The credit of the first conception of a tropical botanic garden is due to Professor Reinwardt of Amsterdam who accompanied the Netherlands’ Commissioners appointed to organise the Netherlands Hast Indian possessions after the termination of British rule. In 1817 Reinwardt proposed to found an experimental garden near the palace park at Buitenzorg, in Java, and. his suggestion being accepted by the Dutch Government, the work was commenced that same year—a Kew gardener being appointed as curator and overseer of the works. In 1822 under Dr. Blume, the first director, the first catalogue, enumerating 900 species, was published. The succeeding twenty years was a period of anxiety for those interested in the success of the station; economic fits on the part of the financial adminstrators and intrigues at home with the view of making the gardens a dependency of the National Museum of Leyden, and curtailing the mdependence and. freedom of action of the garden officials, considerably retarded its development. In the struggle, fortunately for — science, the colonists were triumphant, chiefly owing to PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS. 23 the exertions of Teijsmann, the head gardener, and the year 1866 saw the extension of the garden by the establish- ment of the mountain station at Tyibodas. In 1867 Dr. Scheffer was appointed director and the following year witnessed the separation of the garden from the control of palace officialism. In 1874 the museum was built and the publication of the Annals inaugurated in the year following. In 1876 a school of Forestry and Agriculture was established, and in 1888 on the death of Scheffer the gardens entered on a period of unexampled progressive development under the directorship of Dr. Treub. The description of the garden, as it at present stands, is rendered easy for me by the publication of the important hel 4 volume ‘‘ Der Botanische Garten” ’s Lands Plantentuin “zu Buitenzorg auf Java’”’ in 1898. In this treatise not only is there given a complete historical account of the garden but a very full description of 1t illustrated by many photographs several of which I shall have the pleasure of shewing you. } The garden is of irregular shape and consists of about 145 acres, of which about 30 acres are situated on an island to the eastward of the ground between two branches of the Tjilinwong, a river which bounds the garden on the east side; the north is bounded by the palace park, the west by the high road and the south by the Chinese quarter of the town of Buitenzorg. The garden is supplied with water by a tributary of the Tyilinwong which passes through the garden and feeds the lakes. The garden is intersected by numerous drives and walks. In the south west part are the residences of the director and head gardener, the offices, the laboratories, anatomical, physio- logical and pathological, photographic and printing rooms, the head gardener’s offices, the stables, bedding and other 24 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. outhouses ; whilst on the south east corner are the huts of the native workmen. | The system of arrangement adopted in the garden is that of the Genera Plantarum of Bentham and Hooker, replacing that of Hndlicher which was the system used when T'eijsmann had the direction of the garden. Related families of plants are placed together in the garden, so that the system is a strictly natural one, although of course climbers, marsh plants, and such as shew peculiar habits are collected together in special regions, where their physiological characteristics may be better exhibited than by scattering them all over the garden in proximity to their various relations. The garden contains in all about 9000 species. I wished that time availed for me to give you even the faintest idea of the contents of this magnificent garden. I must leave you to imagine it from the photo- eraphs taken from the published account of the garden I ‘have already referred to.. Dr. Burck’s most admirable account of the treasures of the garden described in a series of imaginary walks through the ground must be read in detail if any adequate conception is to be obtained of this the grandest botanical garden of the tropics. | The Museum originally built in 1859 to accommodate -a collection’ of minerals illustrative of the mining districts in the Colony came into the hands of the garden officials in 1871. The present museum consists of a vestibule and large hall, round which runs a gallery and off which lead passages to various smaller rooms serving as library, keepers’-rooms, work-rooms, store-rooms and a ‘small laboratory. The gallery is occupied by the herbarium preserved in 1200 wooden cases arranged on shelves, and includes collections made by Zollinger in the Celebes, Java -and Lombock, by Teijsmann in his numerous excursions throughout the Archipelago, more especially in New PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS. 95 Guinea and Sumatra, and by numerous other botanists, more or less connected with the gardens, in the less known islands of Malaya. Amongst these the name of one naturalist appears, whom we are proud to honour as our vice-president—I mean Dr. H. O. Forbes. In addition to the herbarium the museum buildings contain a collection of dried fruits and seeds of tropical plants as well as a collection of flowers and fruits preserved in alcohol, an extensive series of samples of timber trees, and a large collection of vegetable products of economic importance, such as jute, hemp, india-rubber, gutta-percha, dyes, cinchona, vegetable oils, indigo, sugar, tea, coffee, rice, tobacco and the thousand and one articles of commerce of vegetable origin, known so familiarly to us in this country in their prepared state but whose native home is in the tropics. The magnificently equipped laboratories and the wealth of tropical vegetation, literally threatening to smother the laboratories themselves, have tempted some of the most famous of our modern botanists to avail themselves of the welcome offered to all students of plant life to visit the Java Gardens by Dr. Treub and his assistants, and the researches of these savants, published in the Annals of the Buitenzorg Gardens and in various Journals and separate volumes, are amongst the most important of the many contributions to our knowledge of tropical plant life that have been published during the past decade. Although greatly inferior to those of Buitenzorg there are many other really fine botanic gardens in the tropics. I may instance though I dare not pause to describe those of Rio de Janeiro with its stately palm avenue, of Hongkong, of Peradeniya, of Singapore and of Calcutta. In the _ Antipodes also Melbourne and Adelaide must be accorded a place of high rank amongst scientific Botanic Gardens. : , : 26 TRANSACTIONS ‘LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. “Turning now to the gardens of Europe we may first glance at those of our own country. Unquestionably the _ chief of these are those of Edinburgh, Glasnevin and ‘Kew. The Universities of Glasgow, Oxford, Cambridge and Dublin also possess gardens but of lesser size and importance. Chelsea Gardens I have already referred to. The Hdinburgh Garden was founded in 1670 to the © east of the North Bridge on a site now occupied by the N.B.R. Station. In 1763 it was transferred to Leith “Walk and in 1819 to Inverleith Row where it now exists and where it covers a space of about 30 acres. The Garden includes an arboretum, palm-house, hot-houses and conservatories, a herbarium, museum and class room and laboratories to accommodate the large classes of - botanical students attending the University. The Glasnevin Gardens at Dublin are much younger dating from about 1795. They were formed at the instance of the Dublin Society and were laid out and endowed by the Irish Parhament. They exceed in extent by ten acres those of Edinburgh but are very similar to them in character and plan. No British Garden—indeed with the single exception perhaps of the great tropical garden of Buitenzorg in Java—no garden of the world approaches in extent and completeness the magnificent establishment at Kew. Its early history has been recently written by the Director, Mr. Thistleton Dyer, in the Kew Bulletin, and those who may be interested in the subject of its first beginnings I would refer to the paper in question. It will serve my - present purpose if I merely state that the Gardens were established in or about 1760 by Queen Caroline, Consort of George the III., and made into a national institution: -in 1840 when Sir William Hooker, then professor of Botany in the University of Glasgow, was appointed PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS. ‘Oy Director. The photos I am able to shew you have been specially taken for the purpose of this address and will, together with the Kew plan, enable you to gain a general notion of the Garden and its contents. In 1840 when the garden was first made a National Institution it covered only 15 acres, now with the Arbore- tum it extends over 248 acres, of which 70 acres form the garden proper. ‘The garden is entered from Kew Green by a remarkably fine gateway, close to which are a small student’s garden and the vast Herbarium, where undoubt- edly there lies a more complete collection of dried plants than exists anywhere else in the world. Inside the grounds one meets first with a house devoted to tropical tree-ferns and aroids, and close at hand Museum IIL., the old orangery, filled chiefly with specimens of timber. A ereat range of houses divided into three sections occupies the centre of this section of the Gardens, and is devoted to culture of tropical and temperate ferns, succulents, heaths, begonias, victorias, temperate and tropical orchids and economic plants; there is also a store house, conser- vatory and alpine house. Near the rock garden and herbaceous ground is a tank for aquatics, as also Museum II. with specimens of botanical interest selected from the monocotyledonous and cryptogamic orders, whilst close to the range of bedding houses and pits, a small laboratory has been erected, conveniently situated for study and research. One cannot help wishing that the Board of Works would see its way to erecting fully equipped laboratories for anatomical and physiological research on a much larger scale. The magnificent collections at one’s hand and the splendid library and herbarium in the immediate neighbourhood, encourage one to hope that at no very distinct date these advan- tages may be still farther added to, and the gardens 28 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. made in every sense the greatest centre for botanical ae and research in the world. The Gardens are constricted about the middle by Kew Palace Grounds, and whilst the area to the north contains the buildings I have just mentioned, that to the south ‘contains the chief museum filled with dicotyledonous examples. On the opposite side of the pond stands the palm house—a building 362 feet long, 100 feet broad and 66 feet high. The grounds surrounding all these museums and hot-houses are crowded with plants of all kinds, hardy in the open air of England. Beyond the gardens proper, is the arboretum bounded by the grounds of the Queen’s Cottage, the river, the deer park and Richmond Road. The chief features of this area are the lake, the great temperate house covering three quarters of an acre and the Marianne North Gallery of paintings of indigenous vegetation in different parts of the world. Probably there are many amongst my audience who have personally visited Kew Garden, and none who have done so can have failed to bring away with them vivid recollections of its high artistic excellence and beauty ; but it needs prolonged residence and study to fully appre- ciate the countless botanical treasures it contains and its enormous scientific interest and value. One word in conclusion on the gardens of the Contin- ental Universities. Every one of them possesses a garden and although many of these are but small in area still they are rightly considered as essential adjuncts to botanical teaching. The museums are small as a rule and are obviously not considered of first-rate importance. Demonstrations are on the other hand always given in the garden and green-houses—the living plant replaces - the bottled preparation. Although in our own country we of course constantly employ the garden—when we are PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS. 29 fortunate enough to possess one—for demonstration pur- poses, still I think we at the same time pay more attention to the museum. In one respect we are immensely behind, namely, in the extent and equipment of our botanical laboratories: but then we in this country are not in a position to draw freely on state aid for such trivial and unimportant matters as University Education. What is contributed by our Government is dealt out with payr- simonious hand and after a deal of pressing. I cannot help thinking that if only a few of the many thousands which are just now being annually expended by County Councils and other public bodies on what has been termed Technical Education were distributed amongst the Colleges and Universities to be devoted by them, at their discretion, to the advancement of general scientific education we might still hope to compete successfully with our continental colleagues. Liverpool with its three-quarters of a million inhabitants might then be able to equip the laboratories of its University College on a scale which would compare favourably with, let us say, one of the smaller German universities such as Jena or Strassburg. I have now reached the end of my time if not of my task. The Botanic Garden, in the history of its development, as I have tried, however crudely and imperfectly, to shew you, reflects the successive phases in the advance of the science. What I have said of the garden is equally true of the botanist himself in his personal training and his methods of teaching—if he be a teacher. In Linnaeus’ time the best botanist was he who knew by name every herb of the field—however little he might know of each. I am not sure that the ideal aimed at in the 18th Century has been altogether abandoned yet. 30 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Anatomy was born, and he was considered learned who knew much about a few plants rather that little about many. The end of the 19th Century has seen the domination of yet a third school. As the systematist gave way to the anatomist so the anatomist is giving way to the physiologist. How a plant—no matter what variety of what species 1t be—lives and moves and has its being—what are the functions of its various parts and how these parts work together for the common good— what part plants play in the balance of nature—in the drama of life on the earth—these are the problems that botanists attempt to solve nowadays. Doubtless it were well that every botanist should know by name every. flowering—yea—every flowerless plant of the field and at the same time be conversant with its entire life cycle, its minute anatomy and the wondrous phenomena of its physiology. But Ars longa vita brevis est—and he has no need to be ashamed who can even say, “In Nature's infimte book of secrecy I can a little read.” APPENDIX. The following list includes the names of the chief Botanical Gardens of the world in existence in 1895. The list does not pretend to be absolutely complete, although it probably includes all of scientific importance. Private gardens such as those of Tresco Abbey, La Mortola, &c., — and public parks, often very extensive and not infrequently arranged on scientific lines, are not recorded. The approximate dates of foundation of some of the more important and historic gardens are inserted in brackets after the name of the city or town. PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS. sii EUROPE. AustriA-HunGARY. Agram, Budapesth, Czernowitz, Dublany, Graz, Innsbruck, Klagenfurth, Kolo- zsvar, Krakau, Laibach, Lemberg, Prague, Salzburg, Schemnitz, Selmeebanya, ‘Trieste. Vienna (2). Beueium. Antwerp, Anvers, Brussels, Gand, Gem- bloux, Liége, Louvain. DENMARK. Copenhagen (2). FRANCE. Angers, Besancon, Brest, Bordeaux, Caen, Cannes, Clermont-Ferrand, Dion, Grenoble Hyeres, Lille, Lyon, Marseille, Montpellier (1596), Nancy, Nantes, Orleans, Paris (4), (1597), Roche- fort, Rouen, 8. Quentin, Toulon, Toulouse, Tours. GERMANY. Aachen, Bamberg, Berlin (2), (1714), Bonn, Breslau, Brunswick, Karlsruhe, Cologne, Darmstadt, Dresden, Erlangen, Strassburg (1619), Frankfurt a.M., Freiburg 1.B., Giessen, Gor- litz, Gottingen, Greifswald, Halle, Hamburg, Heidelberg, Jena (1629), Kiel, Konigsberg, Leip- zig (1580), Marburg, Munden, Munich, Munster, Potsdam, Rostock, Tharandt, Tubingen, Wurz- burg. GREAT Britain. London (4) [Kew (1760), Chelsea (1677), Regents Park, Horticultural Society’s Garden, 8.K.], Belfast, Birmingham, Cambridge, Dublin (2) [Trinity College, Glasnevin (1795)], Edinburgh (1680), Glasgow, Hull, Liverpool, Manchester, Oxford (16382). GREECE. Athens. Houuanp. Amsterdam, Groningen, Leyden (1577), Utrecht, Wageningen. ITauty. Bologna (1567), Brera, Cagliari, Camerino, 32 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Catania, Ferrara, Florence (1550), Genoa, Lucca, — Messina, Milan, Modena, Naples, Padua (1545), Palermo, Parma, Pavia, Perugia, Pisa (1547), 1 Portici, Rome, Siena, Turin, Venice, Urbino. ee Mauta. la Valette. Norway. Christiania. PortuGau. Coimbra, Oporto, Lisbon. RouMANIA. Bucharest, Yassey. Russia. Dorpat, Helsingfors, Kasan, Kharkoff, Kiew, Moscow, Odessa, Orel, Ouman, 8. Peters- burg (2), Tiflis, Warsaw. SERVIA. Belgrade. Spain. Madrid. } SWEDEN. Stockholm (3), Goteborg, Lund, Upsala (1660). , SWITZERLAND. Bale, Bern, Geneva, Lausanne, Zurich. ASTA. Cryton. Peradeniya, Hakgala, Henaratgoda, Ami- radhapura, Badulla. CuinA. Hongkong. | InpIA (BRITISH). Calcutta, Mungpoo, Darjeeling, Darbhangah, Poona, Ghorpuri, Bombay, Nagpur, Ootacumund, Madras, Bangalore, Baroda, Gwalior, Morvi, Travancore, Udaipur, Agra, . Allahabad, Cawnpur, Lucknow, Saharanpur — ‘a Lahore, Simla. Inpia (FRENCH). Saigon, Pondicherry. JAPAN. Tokio. JAVA. Buitenzorg, Tjibodas. SIBERIA. ‘Tomsk. | SrRrairs SETTLEMENTS. Singapore, Penang, Malacca, Perak. PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS. 33 AFRICA. Algiers, Orotava, Cairo, Cape Town, Grahamstown, Port Elizabeth, King Williamstown, Graaf Reniet, Uitenhage, Gambia, Lagos, Gold Coast, Durban, Pietermaritzburg, Old Calabar, Port Louis, S. Denis. AMERICA. CANADA. Montreal, Ottawa. UNITED States. Brookline, Mass., Cambridge, Lan- sing, S. Louis, Washington, Chicago, Lincoln, Ithaca, San Francisco. GUATEMALA. Guatemala. West Inpizs, &c. Barbadoes, George Town, Berbice, British Honduras, Grenada, Jamaica (6), Lee- wards Is. (4), 5S. Lucia, 8. Vincent, Havana, Trinidad. Pepe. Luma. CHILI. Santiago. ARGENTINA. Buenos Aires. EcuabDor. Quito. Braziu. Rio de Janeiro. AUSTRALASIA AND PouynesIA. Sydney, Adelaide, Port Darwin, Brisbane, Rockhampton, Mel- bourne, Hobart Town, Wellington, Dunedin, Napier, Invercargill, Auckland, Christchurch, Honolulu. 34 NINTH ANNUAL REPORT of the LIVERPOOL MARINE BIOLOGY COMMITTEE and their BIOLOGICAL STATION at PORT ERIN. By W. A. Herpman, D.Sc., F.B.S., DERBY PROFESSOR OF NATURAL HISTORY IN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, LIVERPOOL ; CHAIRMAN OF THE LIVERPOOL MARINE BIOLOGY COMMITTEE, AND DIRECTOR OF THE PORT ERIN STATION. [Read 8th November, 1895.] THE close of a third triennial period has witnessed the publication (October, 1895) of a Fourth Volume of Collected Reports by our Committee upon the Fauna of Liverpool Bay and the Irish Sea. This volume practically brings the account of the work of the Committee up to the end of the tenth year; the Committee was formed in 1885, the first volume of the ‘‘ Fauna’ was issued in 1886, vol. IT. in 1889, vol. III. in 1892, and this fourth volume has now appeared in the autumn of 1895—giving an account of the opening of the Port Hrin Station by His Excellency Dr. Spencer Walpole in 1892, and of the investigations conducted in the laboratory and at sea up to the date of our last annual report. The present (ninth) annual report brings on the record to the conclusion of the season 1895. : The Committee have carried on their usual exploring work by means of dredging expeditions and otherwise during the past year. The specimens obtained have been worked up by specialists, and some of the most noteworthy additions to our lists are given below. I am specially indebted to my colleagues on the Committee Mr. Isaac Thompson and Mr. Alfred Walker, to my Assistant Mr. Andrew Scott, and to the various other naturalists who DATE. March. MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN. 4 * have worked at Port Erin during the year for kind help given me in the preparation of this report. STATION RECORD. NAME. % February. 1. C. Thompson ... Wi. A. Herdman. ..:. I. C. Thompson W. A. Herdman ... J. C. Sumner R. Boyce A. Scott F. G. Baily H, O. Forbes W. A. Herdman ... J. D. F. Gilchrist... J. C. Sumner P. M. C. Kermode A. O. Walker W. A. Herdman R. Boyce } P. M. C. Kermode J. C. Sumner I. C. Thompson Boyce... A. Leicester W. A. Herdman ... A. M. Paterson C. Sumner i ee M W. I. Beaumont ... ie. led ... F. W. Gamble J. C. Sumner H. O. Forbes A. Scott W. I. Beaumont ... J. is H. eyer Delius ... The following naturalists have worked at the Port _ Erin Laboratory during the past year :— WORK. Copepoda. | Collecting. Collecting. Collecting. Collecting. Collecting. Collecting. Electric organ of Skate. Tunicata. Opisthobranchiata. Collecting. Collecting. Amphipoda., Oyster experiments General. Collecting. Copepoda Oysters. Mollusca. Tunicata. General. Nemertines. Photographing Alge. Turbellaria. Collecting. Preserving Animals, Copepoda, &e. Nemertines. Collecting. Photographing Algee. Studying fauna 36 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. J. C. Sumner J. D. F. Gilchrist... September. W. A. Herdman ... H. Meyer Delius . J. C. Sumner F. W. Gamble R. J. Harvey Gibson Collecting. Mollusca. General. Studying fauna. Collecting. Turbellaria. Marine Alge. October. I. C. Thompson Copepoda. _ R. Boyce : General. — W.A. Herdman ... Collecting. — J. C. Sumner tk Collecting. November. I. C. Thompson ... Copepoda. — W. A. Herdman ... Oyster experiments. — J. C. Sumner General. The list compares satisfactorily with those of the last few years. It shows only aslight increase in the number of workers, but some stayed for long periods, e.g., Mr. Beaumont from 3lst May to July 12th, Mr. Lea from June 10th to July 4th, and Mr. Delius for the two months August and September. The work done by the various naturalists at the station will be referred to further on. THE AQUARIUM. There is no new feature to note in connection with this part of the establishment. About 200 visitors paid for admission during the season (July and August) when it was on exhibition, while many other visitors were taken round the tanks and dishes at other times of the year when the aquarium was not formally open. Amongst the animals which have lived in our tanks, during 1895, may be noted the angler fish (Lophius piscatorius), the top knot (Zeugopterus punctatus), the plumose anemone (Actinoloba dianthus) for over six months, the starfish Solaster endeca for over two months, the wrasse (Labrus mixtus), young cod and pollack, and various other fishes. Amongst other Invertebrates the Seal Ae. aan My oe st 7 ‘eo 1? a a ee oe ) eZ a ~o. ES Ne oad aj MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN. ore Mollusca Doris tuberculata, Acanthodoris pilosa and Aplysia punctata (the sea hare) spawned freely. The basement floor of the aquarium was made use of by Professor Boyce and Professor Herdman, during a part of the summer, for some of their investigations on the life conditions and health of the oyster, and the effects of certain diseased conditions. Some further experiments on the same subject are being made in these lower tanks this winter; and the place, from its constant coolness and shade and its proximity to beach and sea, is proving admirably suited for such a purpose. THE CURATOR. Mr. J. C. Sumner, from the Royal College of Science, South Kensington, acted as Curator of the Biological Station from March to November, and besides his ordinary routine duties devoted much attention to improving the stock of chemicals and fixing and preserving re-agents in the laboratory. In his report to the Committee he states ‘“‘I made an inventory of everything in the laboratory, all the apparatus, books, &c.; and then made a list of all the things I thought were wanted. These have been brought or sent to the station from Liverpool during the summer, so that now the place is really very well equipped...... the shelves contain all the necessary fixing and killing re-agents, together with some of the commoner stains, &c.’’ (For some faunistic notes from the Curator’s diary, see p. 79). The laboratory assistant, William Bridson, is still in the employ of the Committee, at a weekly wage, and continues to give satisfaction. TEMPERATURE OF THE SEA. The temperatures of sea and air have not been taken with regularity through the season, but so far as the 88 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. observations go they entirely corroborate those of the year before last which were printed in full in the Seventh Annual Report. On the whole the sea off Port Erin seems to be of a more equable temperature—slightly warmer in winter and slightly colder in summer—than that of the shallow waters off the Lancashire and Cheshire coasts. THE PROPOSED SEA-FIsSH HATCHERY. It was hoped that before now some arrangement would have been made with the Lancashire Sea-Fisheries Committee or with the Manx Government, or with both these bodies, whereby a Sea-Fish Hatchery for the Irish Sea should be established at Port Erin alongside the Biological Station. We have now advocated that scheme for some years, our Committee has disinterestedly offered to assist by lending tanks for preliminary experiments, by giving the services of their Assistant and in other ways, and successive reports by individuals and committees have shown that the Port Erin site is superior in natural advantages to any of those proposed an Lancashire, Cheshire or North Wales. The water is pure and cool and salt, and the configuration of shore and cliffs is such as to lend itself readily to the formation of a large spawning pond on the beach, while an adjacent creek could easily be converted into a deep vivarium for lobster culture. Our own Committee has no funds to apply to such a purpose, but if any of the powerful bodies interested in promoting the fisheries of the Irish Sea, or in the technical instruction of the fishermen, will provide the money to erect a small experimental hatchery and spawning pond at Port Erin, the Committee is willing to superintend the work for the first few years, and to give time and trouble so as to show what can be done in this locality in the artificial cultivation of food fishes, - MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN. 39 DREDGING EXPEDITIONS. During 1895 the following dredging expeditions in steamers have been carried out, partly with the help, as before, of a Committee of the British Association. This B. A. Committee was re-appointed, for one year, at the Ipswich Meeting, but must bring its labours to a conclusion with a final report to the Liverpool Meeting of the Association in September 1896. With that fuller report in view for next year, the Committee do not propose now to give details* of the separate expeditions, but content themselves with the following brief summary of the occasions and localities :— I. April 15th, 1895.—Hired steam-trawler ‘‘ Lady Loch.” Localities dredged, to the west and north-west of Port Erin, at depths of 20 to 40 fathoms. IJ. April 25th, 1895.—Hired steam-trawler ‘‘ Lady Loch.” Localities dredged, to the west and south of Port Erin, at depths of 30 to 40 fathoms. At one spot, 6 miles S.E. of Calf Island, 34 fathoms, bottom sand, gravel and shells, such a rich haul was obtained that the trawl-net tore away, and only a small part of the contents was recovered. This contained, however, a number of specimens ofa rare shrimp Pontophilus spinosus, Leach, along with Munida rugosa, Ebalia twmefacta and EH. tuberosa, Xantho tuberculatus, Pandalus brevirostrus, Anapagurus hyndmanm, Campylaspis sp., and Melphi- dippella macera amongst Crustaceans, and the following Echinoderma :—Palmipes membranaceus, Porania pulvil- lus, Stichaster roseus, Luidea savigni, Synapta nherens, and other Holothurians. There were also, of course, many Mollusca, Worms, &c., and an unfamiliar Actinian, which *The course of procedure on these expeditions was very fully described last year (Eighth Annual Report, p. 16) and need not be further referred to now, 40 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Professor Haddon considers to be probably his new species" Paraphellia expansa, previously only known from deep water off the south-west coast of Ireland. III. June ist, 1895.—Hired steam-trawler ‘‘ Lady Loch.” Localities dredged, Calf Sound and off 8.E. of Isle of Man, at depths of 15 to 20 fathoms. IV. June 23rd, 1895.—Hired steam-trawler ‘‘ Rose Ann.” Localities dredged, to the W. and N.W. of Peel and Ballaugh, on the “‘ North Bank,” at depths about 20 fathoms. V. August 3rd, 1895.—Lancashire Sea-Fisheries steamer “John Fell.” Localities dredged and trawled, Red Wharf Bay and off Point Lynas, on north coast of Anglesey, at depths of 6 to 17 fathoms. VI. August 19th, 1895.—Steamer “John Fell.”’ Locali- ties dredged, Carnarvon Bay, on south coast of Anglesey, depths 15 to 18 fathoms. . VII. October 27th, 1895.—Hired steamer ‘‘ Rose Ann.” Localities dredged and trawled, off Port Erin and along S.H. side of Island from the Calf oo to 0 La at depths of 15 to 20 fathoms. _ ADDITIONS TO THE Fauna. In addition to these ‘‘ steamer’ expeditions there has been frequent dredging and tow-netting from small boats, and a good deal of ‘‘ shore collecting.”’ Amongst the more noteworthy animals collected in the district during the year are the following :— C@:LENTERATA. Mr. Edward T. Browne has drawn up a list of thirty- four species of Mrpus which are found in the district, and of these the following are specially noteworthy :— Amphicodon fritillaria (carrying young hydroids in the MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN. Al umbrellar cavity), Dysmorphosa minima, Cyteandra areo- lata (?), Lizzia blondina, Laodice calcarata (new to European seas), and Hutima insignis.* Mr. Browne writes, in regard to his work at the Biological Station, “Port Erin is a good place for Meduse. The tide sweeps clean into the bay and I have found very little difference between the pelagic fauna inside the breakwater and that a mile or two off shore. At Plymouth one has to go about two miles outside the Sound before meeting the Channel tide.”’ Miss L. R. Thornely reports the addition of Perigonimus repens and Tubiclava cornucopia to the list of Hydroids. VERMES. Mr. Beaumont in his recently published report makes the following additions to the list of NEMERTIDA :— Anyphiporus pulcher, A. dissimulans, Tetrastemma flavi- dum, Prosorhochmus claparédu, Micrura purpurea, M. fasciolata, M. candida, and Cerebratulus fuscus. During this summer we have dredged from a gravelly bottom, at 10 to 15 fathoms, in two localities near Port Erin, a species of Polygordius, either P. apogon, M‘Intosh, or a new species. It seems to differ from M‘Intosh’s species in having no eyes. It differs also from all the three species described by Fraipont which have no eyes. Amongst PotycumtTa Mr. Sumner records Arenicola ecaudata and Amplutrite johnston; Mr. Arnold Watson Autolytus alexandri (with egg-sac), and many larval Pectinaria, in membranous tubes 7; inch long. Amongst Potyzoa Miss Thornely reports the rare Triticella boeckiw, found attached to the prawn Calocaris macandree, from the deep mud off Port Erin; also * For Mr. Browne’s observations on these and other species see his report in ‘‘ Fauna of Liverpool Bay,” Vol. LY., 1895, 42 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Schizotheca divisa, Mastigophora dutertrei, Schizoporella vulgaris, and S. cristata, Membranipora solidula, M. nodulosa, and M. discreta, Cribrilina gattye, Porella minuta, Stomatopora incurvata, and Lagenipora socialis all from the shelly deposit, at 16 to 20 fathoms, to the east of the Calf Sound. ? MOLLUSGCA. The following Opisthobranchiata may be mentioned :— Scaphander lignarius, Pleurobranchus plumula, Oscanius membranaceus, Hlysia viridis, Runcina hancockt, Lamel- lidoris aspera, Jorunna johnstom, Aigirus punctilucens, Polycera lessont, Favorimus albus, Cuthona aurantiaca and C. nana, Coryphella gracilis, C. lineata and C. landsburgi, Facelina drummondi, Holis arenicola, Cratena concimna, C. amoena and C. olwvacea, Galvina farram, G. tricolor and G. picta, Hmbletoma pulchra, Acteoma corrugata, Limapontia nigra, Lomanotus genet, and a curious little Doris, which has been dredged several times in the neighbourhood of Port Erin, and is still unidentified. It may possibly be an unknown species. The Nudi- branchs have been chiefly collected and identified by Mr. Beaumont and Mr. Sumner. CRUSTACEA. This section is contributed by Mr. I. C. Thompson and Mr. A. O. Walker, Mr. Thompson taking the Copepoda and Mr. Walker the higher forms. The following addi- tional records of Copepoda have, however, been supplied by Mr. Andrew Scott independently of Mr. Thompson’s report, viz.:—Sunaristes pagurt, Hesse ; Stenhelia reflexa, T. Scott; Laophonte mtermedia, T. 8.; L. propinqua, T.andA.8.; Cletodes similis, T. S.; Nannopus palustris, Brady; Modtolicola insignis, Aur.; and Dermatomyzon gibberum, T. and A, 8.; all new to our fauna. MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN. 43 COPEPODA. In the last report mention was made of a new copepod found by Mr. I. C. Thompson in dredged material taken outside Port Erin at 15 fathoms. This has since been described by Mr. Thompson (‘‘ Trans. Liverpool Biol. Soc.,” Vol. IX., p. 26, Pls. VI. and VIL.) as Pseudocyclopia stephoides. It was by no means easy to decide in which genus to place this well-marked species, as it has strong points of resemblance in common with the three genera, Pseudo- calanus, Stephos, and Pseudocyclopia. With Psewudocy- clopia it agrees in all points excepting in the number of joints in the anterior antenne, and the primary branch of the posterior antenne, and as in general appearance and in the first four pairs of swimming feet it strongly resem- bles Psewdocyclopia it was decided provisionally to place it in that genus. Its fifth pair of feet, however, are more like those of Stephos. In the “Twelfth Annual Report of the Fishery Board for Scotland” Mr. Thomas Scott added a new species belonging to this genus recently found by him in the Forth area. As the genus Pseudo- cyclopia forms a sort of missing link between the families Calanidze and Misophriide, Mr. Scott has wisely consti- tuted a new family, the Pseudocyclopuide, for its reception. The species of Psewdocyclopia described by him having respectively sixteen and seventeen joints in the anterior antennze, he has made that number a family character. The species here described has, however, twenty joints in the anterior antenne, and as it otherwise agrees in all respects with the family characters of Pseudocyclopiide Mr. Thompson suggested that the words “sixteen to seventeen jointed” be altered to “sixteen to twenty jointed” as a character of this new family, with which Mr. Scott at once concurred, 44 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. One specimen of Modiolicola insignis, Aurivillius, new to the district, was found in the washings of dredged material taken some miles off Peel in June, 1895. This species 1s known as a messmate within the shell of the “horse mussel” (Mytilus modiolus), and has been recorded by Canu (‘‘ Les Copep. du Boulon.,”’ p. 238, pl. xxx., fig. 14—20), and more recently by Mr. T. Scott from the Firth of Forth. It had also been found previously by Mr. A. Scott in the ‘‘ Hole”’ to the east of the Isle of Man. The expedition of October 27th in the steamer ‘‘ Rose Ann’”’ was exceedingly prolific, large numbers of Copepoda being found on the bottom in shallow water (15 to 20 fathoms) although there was very little in the surface tow-nets. From some of the dredged stuff (broken shells, &c.) Mr. Scott obtained 35 species three of which, Ameira refleca, Idya gracilis and Tetragoniceps consvmilis, are new to the district, and eight others seem undescribed forms. Mr. Thompson has obtained already, after only a partial examination of the material, 21 species, of which Dyspon- tus brevifurcatus is new to the British fauna, and a Cyclopicera seems new to science. Other rich hauls still remain to be examined by Mr. Thompson. Mr. A. O. Walker reports the following additions to our lists of the HicHER CrusTAcHA :— PoDOPHTHALMATA. Crangon (Pontophilus) spinosus, Leach.—Several, April 25th, 1695, station 8. Colour: whitish, freckled with reddish-brown on the antennal scales and legs; sparsely on the front and hind margins of thorax and first three abdominal segments, and densely on the last three abdominal segments, hind margin of third and generally front margin of fourth abdominal segments and proximal half of telson and lateral appendages white. Length, 24 in. MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN. 45 CUMACEA. *Hemilamprops assimilis, Sars.—Off Galley Head, Co. Cork, November 24th, 1894. *Iphinoe tenella, Sars——Off North Bank, Peel, June 93rd, 1895. This is new to the British fauna. *Diastylis rugosoides, n.sp.—Galley Head, six males. Very near D. rugosa (Sars), from which it differs in the absence of the vertical plica on the carapace, and in the strong dorso-lateral teeth on the first three pleon segments. ISOPODA. Cirolana borealis, Lilljeborg—Galley Head; off Port Erin, April 25th, 1895, station 2. AMPHIPODA. A small collection has been made by Mr. R. L. Ascroft, of Lytham, from trawl refuse and a tow-net attached to the trawl beam when working in the southern part of the Irish Sea off Galley Head. The most interesting feature of it is that nearly all the specimens are adult males, in which condition amphipods are less often taken than any other. This may perhaps be attributed to their having been taken late in November, a season at which collectors do not generally dredge. Parathemisto oblivia, Kroyer.—Galley Head. Callisoma crenata, Bate.—Galley Head; off Port Erin, April 25th, 1895, station 1. Hippomedon denticulatus, Bate.-—Galley Head. Orchomenella ciliata, Sars.—Galley Head. Tryphosites longipes, Bate.-—Galley Head. Lepidepecreum carinatum, Bate.—Galley Head. *Paraphoxus oculatus, Sars.—Off Port Erin, April 25th, 1895, stations 1 and 2. * Those species marked with a star are new to the British fauna, 46 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Epumeria corngera, Febr.—Galley Head. Syrrhoé fimbriata, Stebbing and Robertson.—Off Port April 25th, 1895, station 1. Leptochetrus hirsutimanus (Bate) =L. pilosus, Sars, not - Zaddach.—T'wo miles south-east of Kitterland, 17 fathoms, May 27th, 1894. Photos longicaudatus, Bate —Off Port Erin, April 25th, 1895, stations 2 and 3. *Photis pollez, n.sp.—Colwyn Bay, shore ; Little Orme; Menai Straits, 5 to 10 fathoms. This species is inter- mediate between Photis reinhardi (Kroyer) and P. tenuicornis (Sars). The hind margin of the propodos of the second gnathopod in the male is distally produced into a thumb-lke process which has its origin much nearer the carpus than in P. reinhardi. Podocerus ocius, Bate.—Sponge débris, Port Erin, 1894. PYCNOGONIDA. The following rare species found during tye year at Port Erin have been named by Mr. G. H. Carpenter, of Dublin :—A noplodactylus petiolatus, Kr., Anvmothea echin- ata, Hodge, Nymphon gracile, Leach, N. gallicum, Hoek, Chetonymphon lirtum, Kr., and Pallene producta, Sars, the last apparently new to Britain. SOME STATISTICS OF DREDGING RESULTS. During this year’s work we have been paying some attention to the actual numbers of individuals, species, and genera brought up in particular hauls of the dredge or trawl. Our attention has recently been directed to the matter by some statements in Dr. Murray’s summary volumes of the ‘‘ Challenger’’ Expedition Report which seemed not to be quite in accord with our own experience. Dr. Murray quotes the statistics of the Scottish Sea- MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN. AT Fisheries Board to show that only 7°3 species of inverte- brates and 8°3 species of fishes are captured on the average by the Fisheries steamer ‘‘Garland’s”’ beam trawl; and he cites as an example of a large and varied haul from deep water one taken by the ‘“‘ Challenger’’ at station 146 in the Southern Ocean, at a depth of 1,375 fathoms, with a 10-foot trawl dragged for at most 2 miles during at most two hours, when 200 specimens were captured belonging to fifty-nine genera and seventy-eight species. Murray then goes on to say: ‘‘In depths less than 50 fathoms, on the other hand, I cannot find in all my experiments any record of such a variety of organisms in any single haul, even when using much larger trawls and dragging over much greater distances.’”’ Now our experience of dredging in the Irish Sea is that quite ordinary hauls of the dredge or very small trawl (only 4-foot beam) contain often more specimens, species, and genera than the special case cited from the “‘ Challenger”’ results. On the first of our expeditions after the appearance of Dr. Murray’s volumes we counted the contents of the first haul of the trawl. The particulars are as follows :—June 23rd, 7 miles W. of Peel, on North Bank, bottom sand and shells, depth 21 fathoms, trawl 4 feet beam, down for 20 minutes ; 232 specimens were counted, but there may well have been another 100; they belonged to at least 112* species and 103 genera, a larger number in every respect— specimens, species, and genera—than in the ‘‘Challenger’”’ haul quoted. The list of these species is here given, and marine zoologists will see at a glance that it is nothing out of the way, but a fairly ordinary assemblage of not uncommon animals such as is frequently met when dredging in from 15 to 30 fathoms. * Really an under estimate, several other species have been identified since from the same haul. 48 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. SPONGES: Reniera, sp. Halichondria, sp. Cliona celata Suberites domuncula Chalina oculata C@LENTERATA: Dicoryne conferta Halecvum haleconum Sertularia abietina Coppima arcta Hydrallmama falcata Campanularia verticillata Lafoea dumosa Antennularia ramosa Alcyonwum digitatum Virgularia morabilis Sarcodictyon catenata Sagartia, sp. Adamsia palliata ECHINODERMATA: Cucumaria, sp. Thyone fusus Asterias rubens Solaster papposus Stichaster roseus Porama pulvillus Palmipes placenta Ophwocoma mgra Ophiothriz fragilis Amphiura chraju Ophioglypha ciliata O. albida | Lchinus sphera Spatangus purpureus Hchinocardium cordatum Brissopsis lyrifera fichinocyamus pusillus VERMES: Nemertes neesiw Chetopterus, sp. Sprrorbis, sp. Serpula, sp. Sabella, sp. Owema filiformis Aphrodite aculeata Polynoe, sp. CRUSTACEA : Scalpellum vulgare Balanus, sp. Cyclopicera nigripes Acontiophorus elongatus Artotrogus magniceps Dyspontius striatus Zaus goodsirr Laophonte thoracica _Stenhelia reflera Lichomolgus forficula Anony2, sp. Galathea intermedia Munda bamffica Crangon spinosus Stenorhynchus rostratus Inachus dorsettensis Hyas coarctatus Xantho tuberculatus Portunus pusillus Eupagurus bernhardus £. prideauzn EH. cuanensis _ Hurynome aspera Hbalia tuberosa Pedicellina cernua Tubulipora, sp. Crista cornuta. _ Cellepora pumicosa and three or four undetermined spec- ies of Lepralids _ Flustra securifrons Scrupocellaria reptans — Cellularia fistulosa Mouuvsca : Anomia ephippium ' Ostrea edulis Pecten maximus P. opercularis P. tigrinus P. pusio — Mytilus modiolus Nucula nucleus Cardium echinatum Lissocardium norvegicum MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN. Solen pellucidus Venus gallina Lyonsia norvegica Scrobicularia prismatica Astarte sulcata Modiolaria marmorata Saxicava rugosa Cyprina tislandica — Chiton, sp. Dentalium entale Emarginula fissura Velutina levigata Turritella terebra Natica aldert Fusus antiquus Aporrhais pes-pelicant Oscanius membranaceus Doris, sp. Coryphella landsburgt Tritoma plebera TUNICATA: Ascidiella virginea Styelopsis grossularva Hugyra glutinans Botryllus, sp. Bis 8. The following are two other similar hauls taken with different instruments (dredge and trawl), but both in less than 20 fathoms. On October 27th, 1895, in the steam- trawler ‘“‘Rose Ann” we counted the first haul of the dredge (2 feet of scraping edge) and the first haul of the _ small trawl (4 foot beam) with the following results :— First haul of dredge, across mouth of Port Erin Bay, from Bradda Head towards the Calf Sound, depth 17 fathoms, bottom dead shells, 93 species in 81 genera. 50 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL. BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Ascetta primordialis Cliona celata Halecium haleconum Sertularella polyzonias Hydrallmamia falcata Antennularia antennina Lafoea dumosa | Obelia, sp. A sterias rubens. Henricia sanguinolenta - Solaster papposus — Ophiothria fragilis Lichinus sphera Polynoe, sp. 2. Serpula, sp. Pomatoceros triqueter Sptrorbis, sp. Terebella nebulosa Mucronella peach M. ventricosa Smittia reticulata Membrampora craticula M. flemingia M. dumerilu M. wmbellis Microporella malusit M. ciliata | Lichenopora hispida Schizoporella linearis S. hyalina Idmonea serpens Scrupocellarva. reptans Tubulipora flabellaris Crista, sp. Diastopora suborbicularis - D. patina Porella concinna Chorizopora brongniartia — Cellepora costazw Balanus balanoides — Chthamalus stellatus Cyclopina gracilis Misophria pallida Thalestris clausi Lictinosoma spunipes Cyclopicera lata - C. nigripes. — Lichomolgus maximus Dermatomyzon gibberum Artotrogus magniceps Zaus goodswr Iphvmedia obesa. Melita obtusata Lilleborgia kinahana ee Aora gracilis Hrichthonswus abditis | Phtisica marina ok Gnathia (Anceus), sp. > Hyas araneus H1. coarctatus Hippolyte varians Spirontocaris spinus EHupagurus bernhardus Galathea intermedia Fibalia tuberosa Portunus, sp. Achelia. echinata Anomia ephippium } foes 4 ee SS ee Oe peo we ‘ i ——————— eee eee eee —s= = —— — Nucula nucleus — Mytilus modiolus - _ Pecten opercularis — P. maximus ?. pusio - Saxicava TUGOSA Venus lincta Tapes, sp. 7. Cyprina islandica -Chiton, sp. - Emarginula fissura Velutina levigata — Capulus hungaricus J Leucosolenia coriacea Suberites domuncula Cliona celata — Coppinia arcta Sertularia abietina Antennularia ramosa : Plumularia, sp. Sagartia nivea Sarcodictyon catenata Palmipes membranaceus Solaster endeca Asterias rubens FHenricia sanguinolenta Porania pulvillus Echinus sphera Echinocyamus pusillus vineus marinus Amphiporus pulcher - MARINE BIOLOGICAL ‘STATION AT PORT ERIN. 51 Buccinum undatum Fusus antiquus Trochus cinerarius Holis viridis Polycera quadrilineata. Perophora listera Ciona intestinalis Ascidiella virginea Ascidia mentula A. scabra RAMOS, 85k Styelopsis grossularia — Cynthia Morus ‘The first haul of the small trawl, on me same occasion, _ off the Halfway Rock, in 18 fathoms yielded 111 species in 93 genera, as follows :— Micrura fasciolata Filograna vmplexa Serpula, sp. Pomatoceros triqueter Polynoe, sp. Aitea recta Scrupocellaria scrupea S. reptans Idmonea serpens Schizotheca fissa Crista ramulosa C. cornuta Cellepora pumicosa C. dichotoma | Alcyonidium gelatinosum. A. nytilt Cellaria fistulosa Membranipora pilosa 52 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. M. craticula M. flemingia M. wmbellis , Chorizopora brongniartit Smittra trispinosa S. reticulata Schizoporella linearis Mucronella peachia M. ventricosa M. coccinea Porella concinna Diastopora obelia Microporella malusi Hippothoa diwaricata H. distans . Stomatopora johustom Balanus balanoides Thalestris peltata Dactylopus flavus Laophonte spinosa (?) Fictinosoma atlanticum Cyclopicera gracilicauda Lichomolgus liber Dyspontius striatus Acontiophorus scutatus Artotrogus orbicularis Stenothoe maria Leucothoe spinicarpa Anvphilochus manudens Cyproidea brevirostris Triteta gibbosa Cressa dubia Podocerus cumbrensts Spirontocarts spinus Stenorhynchus, sp. Portunus, sp. Hupagurus bernhardus i. cuanensis Galathea intermedia G. dispersa Pandalus annulicornis Crangon allmana Xantho tuberculatus Pycnogonum littorale Anoma ephipprum Ostrea edulis Mytilus modiolus Pecten maximus P, tigrinus P. pusio P. opercularts Astarte, sp. Venus casina Tapes, sp. Nucula nucleus Saxicava rugosa __ Pectunculus glycumeris Chiton, sp. Cyprina islandica. Tectura virginea Emarginula fissura Plewrotoma, sp. Trochus millegranus T. zizyphinus Goniodoris nodosa Amaroucium, sp. Didemnum, sp. Leptoclhinum maculatum ™ Botryilus, sp. Ascidiella virginea _ Ascidia mentula _ A. plebera MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN. 53 Corella parallelogramma Styelopsis grossularia Cynthia morus : A third haul, on this same occasion (October 27th) gave us, from 16 fathoms, 156 species (see below, p. 64). In order to get another case, on entirely different ground, not of our own choosing, on the first occasion after the publication of Dr. Murray’s volumes when we were out witnessing the trawling observations of the Lancashire Sea-Fisheries steamer ‘‘ John Fell,” I counted, with the help of Mr. Andrew Scott and the men on board, the results of the first haul of the shrimp trawl. It was taken on July 23rd at the mouth of the Mersey estuary, inside the Liverpool Bar, on very unfavourable ground :. bottom muddy sand, depth 6 fathoms. The shrimp trawl (13-inch mesh) was down for 1 hour, and it brought up over seventeen thousand specimens referable to the following thirty-nine species belonging to thirty- four genera :— Solea vulgaris Pleuronectes platessa P limanda Gadus morrhua G. eglefinus G. merlangus Clupea spratta C. harengus Trachinus vipera Agonus cataphractus — Gobius minutus — Raia clavata BR. maculata Mytilus edulis Tellina tents Mactra. stultoruwm Fusus antiquus Carcinus menas Portunus, sp. Pagurus bernhardus Crangon vulgaris Sacculina, sp. Amphipoda (undetermined) Longipedia coronata Ectinosoma spinipes Sunaristes pagurv Dactylopus rostratus Cletodes linucola 54 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Caligus, sp. | Hydractinia echinata Flustra foliacea | Sertularia abietina — Aphrodite aculeata | Hydrallmania falcata — Pectinaria belgica Aurelia aurita 7 Nereis, sp. Cyanea, sp. Asterias rubens These numbers have been exceeded on many other hauls in the ordinary course of work by the Fisheries steamer in Liverpool Bay. For example, on this occasion the fish numbered 5,943, and I have records of hauls in which the fish numbered over 20,000. The shrimps probably number as many again, and if the starfishes and -other abundant invertebrates are added the total must sometimes reach such enormous numbers as from 45,000 to 50,000 specimens in a single haul of the trawl in shallow water, not including microscopic forms. Hauls such as this are doubtless as prolific of individuals as any of those hauls sometimes quoted containing large numbers ‘of specimens (of a very few species) of Copepoda and Schizopoda from waters deeper than 50 fathoms,* and are — certainly far more prolific in species and genera; while hauls such as the three quoted above under dates June 23rd and October 27th compare favourably as to variety of life, 7.e., as to number of species and genera, with the deep water hauls of the ‘‘ Challenger” expedition made with a far larger trawl. On the next occasion, when on board the “ John Fell,” on our own expedition of August 8rd, two members of this Committee (A. O. Walker and W. A. Herdman) identified the species brought up in the first haul of the * Such as those referred to by Mr. Turbyne in ‘‘ Nature” for October 24th, 1895, which illustrate an interesting case of distribution of a very few species but do not affect the argument given above for the relative nob haul for haul, of the shallow as compared with the deeper waters. - ‘“ { 4 . { —— oO _ Solea vulgaris SS. lutea _ Pleuronectes platessa P. limanda | P. flesus Gadus morrhwua G. eglefinus G. merlangus — Callionymus lyra — Raia maculata — Fusus antiquus | Buccinum undatum Natica alderi Plewrotoma, sp. Philine, sp. Holis, sp. Polycera quadrilineata Corbula gibba Mactra stultorum — Serobicularia alba Portunus depurator Corystes cassiwelaunus Hyas coarctatus — Stenorhynchus phalangium — Hupagurus bernhardus Crangon vulgaris Pseudocuma cercaria — Diastylis rathket D. spinosa — Balanus balanoides | Paratylus swammerdammii * MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN. 55 trawl (5-inch mesh), taken in Red Wharf Bay, Anglesey, at a depth of 4 to 7 fathoms. They were 78 species, belonging to 67 genera, as follows :— Harpinia neglecta Ampelisca levigata Monoculodes longimanus — Amphilochus melanops Pariambus typicus | Achelia echinata Aphrodite aculeata Nerets, sp. Terebella, sp. (2?) Syllas, sp. Serpula, sp. Sptrorbis, sp. Cellaria fistulosa Flustra foliacea Hucratea chelata Scrupocellarva reptans Bugula, sp. Cellepora pumvicosa C. avicularis — Porella compressa Mucronella peach Membranipora membranacea M. pilosa | Alcyonidium gelatinosum Vesicularia spinosa Gemellaria loricata Lichenopora hispida Crista eburnea C. cornuta Idmonea serpens Asterias rubens 56 ‘TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Amphiura squamata Antennularia ramosa Ophioglypha albida Coppyma arcta Tealia crassicornis Sertularella polyzonias Alcyonwum digitatum Sertularia abvetina Clytia gohnstona S. argentea Lafoéa dumosa Diphasia rosacea Hydrallmama falcata D. tamarisca Halecwum haleconum Tubularia indwisa This was a haul—from very shallow water—which combined mere quantity of life, z.e., number of mndividuals, with variety of life or nwmber of species and genera. The ten species of fish were represented by 879 individuals, and we estimated that there were some hundreds of crabs and of starfishes, and some thousands of shrimps. The numbers of the Molluscs, of the hermit-crabs, of Balanus and of Sprrorbis were also very large. From these statements it is clear that whether it be a question of mere mass of life or of varvety of life, haul for haul, the shallow waters can hold their own against the deep sea, and form in all probability the most prolific zone of life on this globe. RELATIONS OF GENERA TO SPECIES. A point which comes out in making complete lists, such as those given above, of the contents of the net on one haul is the relatively large number of genera represented by the species.* In the haul, quoted above, from the expedition of June 23rd, the 112 species were referred to 103 genera; in the haul from the Fisheries steamer on July 28rd, the 89 species obtained belong to 34 genera; on August 8rd, there were 78 species and 67 genera, and *Dr. Murray, in the Challenger “‘ Summary,” notes this fact in the case of deep-sea hauls, but does not seem to recognise its application to shallower waters. | MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN. 57 in the two hauls of October 27th there were 93 species in 81 genera and 111 species in 93 genera. Taking a few instances of particular groups—on August 25th, 1894, the 15 species of Tunicata taken in one haul represented 10 genera; and Mr. Walker reports the following numbers of species and genera in hauls of the higher Crustacea :— March, 1893, off Rhos, shallow, 19 species in 18 genera; May, 1893, off Rhos, two fathoms, 24 species in 21 genera ; July, 1898, off Little Orme, 5 to 10 fathoms, 31 species in 28 genera; October, 1893, off Little Orme, 4 to 10 fathoms, 41 species in 86 genera; September, 1894, off Little Orme, shallow, 39 species in 35 genera; and April, 1895, off Port Erin, 34 fathoms, 40 species in 35 genera.* These figures are particularly interesting in their bearing on the Darwinian principle that an animal’s most potent enemies are its own close allies.+ Is it then the case, as the above cited instances suggest, that the species of a genus rarely live together; that if in a haul you get half- a-dozen species of lamellibranchs, amphipods, or annelids they will probably belong to as many genera, and if these genera contain other British species these will probably occur in some other locality, perhaps on a different bottom, or at a greater depth? It is obviously necessary to count the total number of genera and species of the groups in the local fauna, as known, and compare these with the numbers obtained in particular hauls. That has been *These numbers refer to the Higher Crustacea only. There were many other animals in the hauls. +** As the species of the same genus usually have, though by no means invariably, much similarity in habits and constitution, and always in struc- ture, the struggle will generally be more severe between them, if they come into competition with each other, than between the species of distinct genera.” Darwin, The Origin of Species, sixth edition, p. 59; see also Wallace, Darwinism, second edition, p. 33, 58 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. done to some extent with the Fauna” of Liverpool Bay, and the following instances may be taken as samples. — The known number of species of higher Crustacea in Vol. I. of the “Fauna” (1886) is 90, and these fall into 60 genera. But many species have been added since then, so Mr. Walker has gone over the records up to date (1895), and states that we now know in our local fauna 230 species which belong to 150 genera. This is still much the same proportion as in the former numbers, so we may take it that in our district the genera are to the species as 2 to 3, whereas in the collections quoted from Mr. Walker above the genera are to the species on the average about as 28 to 31, or nearly 7 to 8. It can also be brought out by similar series of numbers that as one extends the area investigated the number of species per genus is increased. In a single haul, in our district as we have seen, the species are to the genera about as 8 to 7, in our local fauna the proportion is about 3 species to 2 genera, while in the much wider area embraced by Sars’ Amphipoda of Norway the numbers are 365 species to 157 genera or nearly 5 species to 2 genera. In other words if allied ‘species, taking a large district, were associated together we might expect to find about twice as many species per genus in each haul as we do find. | | Mr. Walker has gone carefully into this matter of the proportion of genera to species in our hauls, and in other areas, and from the figures in his notes I extract the following records, in support of the above statement :— Rhos Bay, 13/5/93, Amphipoda, 16 sp. in 14 genera. Little Orme, 28/7/93, Amphipoda, 24 sp. in 22 genera. ae 5/10/98, ‘ 29° ;, =e The ageregate of the species and genera of Amphipoda in the above three dredgings is 69 species in 60 genera, or an average proportion of 115:100. Now the total number . MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN. 59 of Amphipoda so far recorded in the L. M.B.C. District ‘(about 5000 sq. miles) is 124 species in 78 genera, or inthe proportion of 159: 100; while G. O. Sars dealing ‘with the Amphipoda of Norway—a very much more extended area—gives 365 species in 157 genera, or in the proportion of 232 : 100. To sum up, the proportions of species and genera, in these Amphipoda are :— Rhos, &c., 1 to 10 fms., 115 sp. in 100‘gen., or 14:1. L.M.B.C. dist., to 70 fms., 159 sp. in 100 gen., over 13:1. Norway, to 1215 fms., 232 sp. in 100 gen., or 23:1. So, it is clear that as one increases the area and depth investigated the proportion of species to genera in the fauna increases, until e.g., on the coasts of Norway it has become more than twice what it is on the north coast of Wales. Again, the total number of recorded species of L.M.B.C. -Tunicata is 46, and these are referred to 20 genera; while in the case given above (August 25th, 1894) the 12 species taken on one spot represented 10 genera, or, a little over a quarter of the species represented half the genera. ‘These and many other series of statistics in regard to other groups which we might quote, seem to show that a disproportionately large number of genera is represented by the assemblage of species at one spot, which means that closely related species are, as a rule, not found together. } We know of some individual cases, of course, of allied Species occurring together, but these do not necessarily affect the general argument. Exceptional cases may be due to some special habit which, although the species are allied forms, prevents them from being severe competitors. It is possible also that sessile animals, such as hydroids and polyzoa, may form a partial exception, and may differ 60 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. from’ wandering forms in their method of competition. However Miss Thornely finds that in most gatherings of Polyzoa the species are less than twice the number of genera, while in our ‘“‘ Fauna”’ the average recorded number is 2'5 species in a genus. Moreover the colonies on dead shells or on stones are generally not only distinct species, but also distinct genera. As many as ten genera are sometimes represented by the Polyzoon colonies on one shell. We are accumulating further statistics on all these points. | THE SUBMARINE DEPOSITS. In last year’s report the nature of. the deposits forming on the floor of the Irish Sea was discussed in a preliminary ‘manner. During this season’s work the bottom brought up on each occasion has been carefully noted and a sample kept for future study in the Jermyn Street Museum. One point which this collection of deposits from com- paratively shallow shore waters seems to bring out is that _the classification of submarine deposits into ‘‘terrigenous” _ and ‘‘ pelagic,’ which was one of the earliest oceanographic results of the ‘‘ Challenger’? Expedition, and which is still adhered to in the latest ‘‘ Challenger’’ volumes as an accepted classification, does not adequately represent or express fully the facts. Terrigenous deposits are supposed ‘to be those formed round continents from the waste of the land, and are stated to contain on the average 68 per cent. of silica. Pelagic deposits are those formed in the open ocean from the shells and other remains of animals and plants living on the surface of the sea above, and they are almost wholly free from quartz particles. Ordinary coast sands and gravels and muds are un- doubted terrigenous deposits. Globigerina and Radiolarian _oozes are typical pelagic deposits. But in our dredgings | MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN. 61 in the Irish Sea, where the deposits ought all, from their position, to be purely terrigenous, we meet with several distinct varieties of sea-bottom which are not formed mostly from the waste of the land, and do not contain anything like 68 per cent. of silica; but, on the contrary, are formed very largely of the remains of bottom haunting plants and animals, and may contain as little as 17 per cent. of silica. Such are the nullipore bottoms, and the shell sand and shell gravel met with in some places, and the sand formed of comminuted spines and plates of echinoids which we have found off the Calf Island. These deposits are really much more nearly allied in their nature, and in respect of the kind of rock which they would probably form if consolidated,* to the calcareous oozes amongst pelagic deposits, than they are to terri- genous deposits, and yet they are formed on a continental area close to land in shallow water. Moreover, although agreeing with the pelagic deposits in being largely organic in origin, they differ in being derived not from surface organisms, but from plants (the nullipores) and animals which lived on the bottom. Consequently the division of deposits into “‘terrigenous”’ and ‘‘pelagic’’ ought to be modified or replaced by the following classification :— 1. Terrigenous (Murray’s term, restricted)—where the deposit is formed chiefly (say, at least two-thirds, 66 %) of mineral particles derived from the waste of the land. 2. Neritict—where the deposit is largely of organic origin, its calcareous matter being *They seem closely comparable with the Coralline and Red Crag formations of Suffolk. + Adopted from Haeckel’s term for the zone of shallow water marine fauna, see ‘‘ Plankton Studien,” Jena, 1890; also Hickson’s ‘‘ Fauna of Deep Sea,” 1894, 62 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. derived from the shells and other | hard parts of the animals and Lae living on the bottom. 3. Planktonic (Murray’s pelagic)—where the greater part of the deposit is formed of the remains of free-swimming animals and plants which lived in the sea ; above the deposit. Be The last group is ; Murray’ s “pelagic”? unchanged, and that, there can be no doubt, is a natural group of deposits; but Murray’s ‘‘terrigenous”’ is an unnatural or hetero- geneous assemblage containing some deposits, such as the sravel off Bradda Head and the sand of the Liverpool bar, which are clearly terrigenous in their origin, along with others such as shelly sands and nullipore deposits which have much less to do with the waste of the land, but are very largely organic in origin and formed by animals and plants an sitw. The proposal is then to recognise this latter group of deposits by separating them from the truly terrigenous under the name “ Neritic.” Probably some of the Coral. sands described by Murray and Renard in their Challenger Report on ee would also fall into this category. aoe | _ Professor Johannes Walther, of Jena, ae has of recent years been working on the borderlands of geology and bionomics, in a recent letter to me on my proposed classification of deposits says:—‘‘Ich meine dass der Ausdruck benthonisch statt neritisch richtiger ware. .Denn es kommt doch bei der Diagnose weniger daraufan, dass die Ablagerung in der Flachsee, als dass sie durch benthonisch Orgamsmen (Coralline, Korallen, Echinoder- men, Mollusken, Bryozoen, etc.) gebildet wird.” With this I can. quite agree. I lay most stress on the nature (bottom plants and animals) of the particles composing a ee eee a eS ee — a E ; | ’ ~~ = ee * - MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN. 63 the deposits, and I do not mind much whether they are called Neritic or Benthonic so long as the category is recognised as distinct from terrigenous. Dr. C. Kohn has kindly analysed for me a series of fair samples of deposits from different parts of the Irish Sea, with the following results :— NERITIC. TERRIGENOUS. 16°83 | 46°65 | 54°84 | 23°41 | 84°62 | 83°06 | 77°10 | 78-92 S102. Silica. 9°18 | 9°20) 8°59 Cal. Be arate. Ce 39 71 | 59°66| 6°38 Residue (other | 3.99 | y4-99| 6-45 | 19-93 | 9-00) 13-70 | 13-70 | 12°69 _ than Silica). - ee 100°00/100°00|100°00/100-00/100°00 |100°00/100-00 The localities and particulars are,— . 1 mile off Spanish Head, 16 faths., shell fragments. 1 mile off Calf of Man, 20 faths., shells and spines. 1 mile off Calf of Man, 18 faths., shell sand, spines. . 2 miles off Dalby, 15 faths., nullipores. . Liverpool Bar, 3 faths., sand. | Bahama Bank, 13 faths., muddy sand. . King William Bank, 5 faths., coarse sand. . North end of ‘ Hole,” 28 faths., mud. It will be noticed that the four terrigenous deposits (sands and muds) all show less than 10 % of calcium carbonate ; _ while the four neritic have all more than 38 %—well over a third—of calcium carbonate, and one (A.) has over 79 %. The silica in these neritic deposits may be less than 17 %, HQtHU One *Shelly deposit. Contained 1:09 % of small stones not included in analysis. | +Contained 4°82 % of magnesium carbonate, in addition to calcium carbonate. 64 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. and does not rise in any to 55 %. In round numbers it may be said that in these examples the silica makes up from 20 to 50% and the calcium carbonate from 40 to 80 %. In all the neritic deposits there are in the residue small quantities of calcium pees of iron and of alumina. In some of these Aopceitas the calcareous matter is formed almost entirely of Lithothamnion. Amongst the Nullipores from our neritic deposits Professor Harvey Gibson has identified the following species :—Lithotham- nion polymorphum, L. calcareum, L. agariciforme, L. fasciculatum, the wanes fruticulosum, and Lithophyllum lenormandt. 7 One of these neritic deposits (A) has its calcareous matter formed by a large number of animals, belonging to various groups, in addition to nullipores. One sample (measuring 7 qts., 14 pts., and weighing, when dry, 17 lbs. 3} 0zs.) which I have gone over carefully for the purpose of identifying the constituent particles contains more or less fragmentary remains of at least the following 99 species, all of them forms that leave calcareous remains :— NULLIPORES: , Cellepora avicularis Lithothammon fasciculatum | C. dichotoma LL. caleareum - C. pumicosa Lithophyllum lenormands Idmonea serpens ECHINODERMATA : Microporella ciliata Lichinus sphera M. malusi Echinocyamus pusillus M. violacea Fichinocardiwm cordatum Schizotheca fissa VERMES: *S. dwisa Serpula, sp. Mastigophora hyndmanna Spirorbis, sp. | *M. dutertres Pouyzoa :t | Mucronella peachit Cellaria fistulosa M. variolosa * New to district. + Identified by Miss L. R. Thornely, MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN. 65 M. ventricosa M. coccinea *Do., var. mamillata Schizoporella auriculata 8S. linearis S. wnicornis _S. sumplez *S. vulgaris S. discoidea *S. cristata Membranipora catenularia M. solidula M. pilosa . *M. nodulosa *M. discreta M. aurita M. craticula M. flemingu Hippothoa distans Cribrilina annulata C. punctata *C. gattye Crisia aculeata Aitea recta Amatiua lendigera Porella concinmna Do., var. bella *P,. minuta Cribrilina radiata Phylactella collaris P. labroswm Micropora corvacea Chorizopora brongniarti Diastopora patina D. obelia D. suborbicularis Stomatopora johnstont *S. incurvata Lepralia foliacea L. pertusa Lagenipora socialis Smittia trispinosa S. reticulata Lichenopora hispida CRUSTACEA: Balanus balanoides Verruca, sp. Cancer pagurus Monuvusca : Anomia ephipprum Lima elliptica Pecten opercularis P. pusio Cardium edule Venus casina V. ovata Nucula nucleus My tilus edulis Saxicava rugosa Tapes, sp. Mactra solida Pectunculus glycimeris Acmea testudinalis A. virginea Emargiuula fissura Helcion pellucidum Trochus magus T. millegranus 66 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. T’. cinerarius | Bucconum undatum Plewrotoma, sp. Capulus hungaricus JERS Cyprea europea Murex erinaceus Nassa incrassata Phasianella pullus fissoa, sp. Natica, sp. fi., sp. From a bag of this shelly Neritic deposit (A), described above, Mr. Andrew Scott has by careful examination _ managed to extract the following 36 species of Copepoda, of which 4 are new records for our district and 8 others — seem new to science :—Pseudocyclops obtusatus, B. & R.; Ectinosoma sarsit, Boeck; E. melaniceps, Boeck; EH. erythrops, Brady; H. gracile, T. & A. Scott; Tachidius brevicorms, Muller; Stenhelia, n.sp.; Stenhelia, n.sp.; — Amewra longipes, Brady; A. longicaudata, 'T. Scott; A. refleca, T. Scott; A. gracile, n.sp.; Mesochra macintosh, T.& A.8.; Paramesochra dubia, T. Scott; Tetragoniceps consimilis, T. Scott; Laophonte thoracica, Boeck; L. cur- ticaudata, Boeck; Pseudolaophonte aculeata, n.gen. and n.sp.; Normanella attenuata, n.sp.; Dactylopus stroma, Baird; D. tenmremis, B. & B.; D. flavus; @ianseae brevicorms, Claus; Thalestris rufocincta, Norman; T.” peltata, Boeck; Harpacticus chelifer, Muller; Zaus spima- tus, Goodsir; Z. goodsiri, Brady; Idya gracilis, T. Scott; LIichomolgus fucicolus, Brady; L. furcillatus, Thorell; Dermatomyzon ngripes (B. & R.); Ascomyzon thompson, n.sp.; Acontiophorus scutatus, B. & R.’; and two other species which have not yet been worked out. Mr. Thompson has also identified from a sample of the same deposit which he examined a number of the above species, and in addition the following five :—Porcellidium, sp., Ametra attenuata, Laophonte spinosa, Scutellidiwm fasciatum, and Artotrogus orbicularis, uate 41 species of Copepoda in all. _ MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN.) 67 _ These 41 species added to the 99 species from the same haul noted on p. 64 and to the following 16 species recorded from the trawl on Oct. 27th, when the haul was taken, make in all 156 species :—Mytilus modiolus, Pecten tigrinus, Trochus zizyphinus, Fissurella greca, Hulima polita, Pagurus prideauxu, Ophiothri« fragilis, Ophicoma migra, Adamsia palliata, Sertularia abietina, Antennu- laria ramosa, Hydrallmania falcata, Tubularia, sp., Glycera, sp., Amphiporus pulcher, Flustra foliacea. It ought to be remembered, however, that a good many (by no means all) of the Mollusca and a few of the Polyzoa were dead. Mr. Clement Reid, F.G.S., of the Geological Survey, has examined the samples of deposits which were sent by us to the Jermyn Street Museum, and reports as follows :— “The series of dredgings examined since the last report is most interesting from a geological point of view. One is again struck by the common occurrence of loose angular stones at places and depths apparently well beyond the reach of any bottom drift—at least beyond the reach of currents likely to move such coarse material. This stony sea-bed is in all probability the result of submarine erosion of glacial deposits. Its occurrence renders comparison between recent marine deposits of these latitudes and Tertiary deposits a task of peculiar difficulty ; for not only is the nature of the true marine sediments masked, but the fauna also must be greatly altered. It is evident that numerous species which need a firm base on which to affix themselves will be encouraged by a stony bottom ; while in a Tertiary deposit, formed under identical conditions, except for the absence of stones, they may be 68 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. entirely missing, having nothing but dead shells to which to attach themselves. “Notwithstanding this peculiarity of most of the dredgings, a few samples may well be compared with our Older Pliocene (Coralline Crag). I would particularly draw attention to certain localities where material almost entirely of organic origin has been obtained. Of these perhaps the most interesting are some samples full of Cellaria jfistulosa (found to the south-east of the Calf Sound, 20 fathoms). They are in many respects strikingly like certain parts of the Coralline Crag. The more ordinary type of Coralline Crag, with its extremely varied polyzoon fauna, we cannot yet match in British seas :* it was probably formed, as the mollusca indicate, in a sea several degrees warmer than ours. ‘It was hoped that in the course of these dredgings some light might be thrown on the Tertiary strata under- lying the bed of the Irish Sea, for in the North Sea the dredge occasiunally brings up hauls of Tertiary fossils. This expectation has not yet been realised; but possibly, by dredging in the channels where the submarine scour is sreatest, such deposits may yet be reached. It is very important to obtain some knowledge of the Tertiary bed of the Irish Sea, for Irish Pleistocene deposits contain a considerable admixture of extinct forms, which may be derived from Tertiary deposits below the sea-level. The Glacial Drift of Aberdeenshire contains Pliocene Volutes and Astartes, derived from some submarine deposit off the Aberdeenshire coast. The so-called ‘ Middle Glacial Sands’ of Norfolk are full of shells which I now believe to be derived from some older deposit, probably beneath the sea.”’ f *See, however, the deposit described on p. 64, where nearly 60 species of Polyzoa are recorded from one haul.—W, A. H. MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN. 69 The important influence of the shore rocks upon the littoral fauna has not been neglected, and lists and observations are accumulating, but that subject must be left over for a fuller discussion in next year’s report. OTHER INVESTIGATIONS. Several new lines of investigation have been started during the year, and are still in progress. One of these may be called the “larval-attachment inquiry,’ and consists in sinking in various parts of the bay an apparatus composed of a rope weighted at one end and buoyed at the other, and having a number of slips of glass, slate, wood, &c., attached at equal distances along its length, These ropes are hauled up and examined periodically, and may be expected, when further observations have been taken, to give information as to the times and modes of attachment of the larvee of various species, and also as to the most suitable substances for particular kinds of larvee to settle down upon. So far, glass seemed in the early spring (February and March) to be the favourite substance. A surprisingly large number of algee, compared with the animals, appeared, and nearly all were on the glass slips. Later on, in the summer, Barnacles (Balanuws) made their appearance in great numbers on the slips of wood and on the wooden buoy at the top of the apparatus, while all the upper part of the rope within a few feet of the surface became covered with alge. A number of Ascidians (Ascidiella virginea) were also found, in August, to have attached themselves to the rope, and seemed to have got as far as possible in between the strands and into the coils of the knots. On the upper pieces of slate, and in one instance on a piece of glass, there were young specimens of the tubicolous Annelid, Pomatoceros triqueter, in no case more than $ to # inch in length, 70 ~ TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. - At the end of October another rope, which had been sunk in the bay since June with a bag of oysters, was hauled up, and the upper 4 or 5 feet, much covered with alge, was removed for examination in the laboratory. It was found to have the following organisms adhering :— Aue (identified by Prof. Harvey Gibson) : Ceramium rubrum, C. Ag. P. mgrescens, Grev. C. strictum, Harv. P. elongata, Grev. C. deslongchampsii, Chauv. Dictyota dichotoma, Lamx. Chantransia daviesti, Thur. | Sphacelaria cirrhosa, C. Ag. C. virgatula, Thur. E'nteromorpha clathrata, J.Ag. Desmarestia aculeata, Lamx.| Monostroma witrocku, Born. Polysiphomaurceolata, Grey. | Colonies of Gomphonema. ZOOPHYTES (identified by Miss L. R. Thornely) : | Obelia gemculata Bougainvillea muscus O. longissuma Opercularella lacerata Cytia johnstona Pouyzoa (Miss Thornely) : — Membranipora pilosa Scrupocellarva reptans Eucratea chelata | Schizoporella hyalina oS TunicaTa (Miss J. H. Willmer) : Diplosoma gelatinoswn | Ascidiella virginea Crustacea (identified by Mr. A. O. Walker) : Huppolyte varvans : Gammarus locusta Idotea marina Lileborgia kinahant Hyale nilsson Amphithoe rubricata Apherusa bispinosa Podocerus falcatus Dexamine spinosa | Caprella acanthifera. THE Drirt BoTTLES AND SURFACE CURRENTS. In last year’s report the scheme for the distribution of ‘drift bottles over the Irish Sea, for the purpose in helping to determine the set of the chief currents, tidal or other- wise, which might influence the movements of fish- food - MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN. 71 and fish embryos, was fully explained. Since then the work has been going on actively, and now at the end of about twelve months one thousand drift bottles in all have been set free. Many have been let out at intervals of ten minutes, or quarter of an hour, or twenty minutes (corresponding to distances of from 3 to 6 miles apart) from the Isle of Man boats when crossing between Liverpool and Douglas—a very convenient line of 75 miles across the middle of the widest part of our area, traversing the “‘ head of the tide”’ or meeting place of the tidal currents entering by St. George’s Channel and the North Channel. Others have been let off from Mr. Alfred Holt’s steamers, in going round from Liverpool to Holyhead and in coming down from Greenock. Mr. Dawson on the Fisheries steamer ‘‘John Fell” has distributed a number along the coast in various parts of the district, and the Fisheries bailiffs have let off some dozens from their small boats. Other series have been set free at stated intervals during the rise and fall of the tide from the Morecambe Bay Light Vessel in the northern part of our area, north of the ‘‘ head of the tide;”’ and, through the kindness of Lieutenant M. Sweny, R.N., a similar periodic distribution has taken place from the ‘Liverpool North-West Light Vessel, to the south of the “head of the tide.” Others, finally, have been despatched by Mr. R. L. Ascroft, by Mr. Andrew Scott and by various members of the Committee in other parts of the area ‘from small boats and on our dredging expeditions, in some cases between the Isle of Man and Ireland. Altogether we have pretty well covered this northern area of the Trish Sea in our distribution of floating bottles. The first bottles, and the printed paper they contained, were described last year. We afterwards adopted a rather larger size of bottle, 8°5 cm. in length; and, after 72 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. various postal difficulties and experiments, we hit upon a convenient size and thickness of private post card, which, ready stamped and addressed, and marked with a dis- tinguishing letter or number, is rolled up in its bottle and has printed on its back the following :— For scientific enquiry into the currents of the Sea. Whoever finds this is earnestly requested to write | distinctly the DATE and LOCALITY, with full particulars, in the space below, and to put the card in the nearest post office. [No. here] @eeovoeceeveee eee eee eeeereereeeeeeeseeeeeseeeee eee eeeteeeeeeeeeeeeeeseseoneeeses eeceoeeeeeec ese eee eee eee eee Zeer eeeseneeE FOF eee eee EET EEF HOTEL HOC EEH HES HES OEE DaTE, when found...is..:csdeae) ops ss. see eee Name and address of sender.........:: Of an inch in its widest diameter, tapering to about =3> at the narrow end. ‘To the wider end of this membranous tube the worm attaches very minute grains of sand, course after course, forming a sand tube about go Of an inch in external diameter. The length of the larval worm from tip of tail to the outer margin of the minute headbristles, or combs, is about =~ of an inch. Last spring Mr. Ascroft was good enough to send me some living specimens of these larvee which, for a few days, survived their journey, and were very active. At this stage of the animal’s existence a pair of eye-spots are visible. He also sent me in March last, for identification, a specimen of Autolytus alexandri (with its egg sac) taken by surface tow-netting in the daytime off the Bahama Light Ship, near Ramsey, Isle of Man. Hornell recorded in 1892 a MALE specimen of this worm taken by tow-netting off Puffin Island, which was the first recorded from British waters.” 78 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Mr. Watson has completed his work on the tube- building habits of Panthalis oerstedi, referred to in last report, and his paper on the subject, with two plates, has been published in Vol. IV. of the ‘‘ Fauna.”’ One of the specimens of Panthalis from Port Erin lived in Mr. Watson’s Aquarium at Sheffield from. September 30th, 1894, to October 8th, 1895, when as it seemed ailing he killed it with corrosive. ‘Dr. J. D. F. Gilchrist who has paid several short visits to the Biological Station, and worked there for some time at Easter, has sent in the following report upon his work to the Director :—‘‘ During my stay at the Marine Station at Port Erin, I was chiefly concerned with the Mollusca, but found the frequent shore collecting and dredging excursions very profitable for general work. Aplysia was found in abundance by dredging and I took this opportunity of trying various methods of killing the animal in an expanded condition. After trying several, I found the following the only method which could be depended on with certainty. A few drops of a 5% solution of cocain were mixed with the water in which the Aplysias were. After a time they expanded fully. They were then left in the solution (12 hours or more) till no contraction ‘took place when removed and put into weak alcohol. If contraction took place they would be put back into the -cocain solution when they again expanded. This was repeated till no contraction took place, when they could, after a time, be put into stronger alcohol. Other -methods though simpler, and not so tedious, were less dependable and at best gave a somewhat abnormally inflated appearance. : “ At Prof. Herdman’s suggestion a solution of formol was — tried as a preserving fluid for Aplysia and Plewrobranchus. -In both cases a considerable amount of colouring matter . MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN. 79 was dissolved out of the integument and stained the surrounding fluid of a reddish colour. “‘ A series of experiments on the method of feeding in Lamellibranchs was begun, to show in what manner the gills exercised the function of collecting food material and the labial palps of discriminative selection of food particles. I hope to be able to give the results of these experiments after further observations. ““T also procured at the Station specimens of Opistho- branchs which will form material for future work.”’ The Rey. T. S. Lea (who has kindly presented a large ordinance map, 6 inches to the mile, of the S.W. of the Isle of Man, to the Biological Station) has continued this summer his series of observations upon the zones of algze on the shore, and has taken a number of photographs of species in situ on the rocks and in pools. . The work done by Mr. Browne and by Mr. Beaumont at the Station is sufficiently dealt with in their reports, upon the Meduse and the Nemertea respectively, which have now been published in Vol. IV. of the ‘‘ Fauna.” Mr. Walker and Mr. Thompson have discussed the results of their work on Crustacea some pages back (p. 42); and the investigations of Prof. Boyce and Prof. Herdman on oysters under various normal and abnormal conditions is work of a very special nature—partly bacteriological and partly experimental—which is still in progress, and will be reported upon in full to the British Association -and to the Lancashire Sea-Fisheries Committee. In a brief report from the Curator giving an outline of the work of the summer the following observations which seem worthy of permanent record occur :—‘‘ The _ dredgings in May produced amongst other nudibranchs Cuthona arenicola, new to the fauna round the Isle of Man ; and two Polychetes, which though common here 80 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. have not, as yet, been recorded in the L. M.B.C. lists, were found on the shore—these were Amphitrite johnstont and Arenicola ecaudata. The latter species seems to take the place of A. marina amongst stones and muddy shingle where it is invariably found, while A. marina is confined to the sand...The dredgings in June brought to light several interesting animals, some of the more important finds being :—Cratena olivacea, new to the Isle of Man, and which has proved to be not uncommon in the upper Coralline zone off Port Erin; E’mbletonia pulchra, new to the district, which during June and July appeared in almost every dredging that was taken; Coryphella landsburgi, new to the Isle of Man, taken several times; Oscanwus membranaceus, dredged in 15 fathoms off Port Erin; and Holts coneinna. At Whitsuntide, Polygordius was dredged from a gravel bottom off Bradda Head, and it has since turned up in two different localities, from similar ground... About this time of the year (July) and for the rest of the summer the bay was full of young fish known to the fishermen as ‘‘Guilpins.”’ These are chiefly young cod and pollach—mostly the latter. Some were caught and put into one the tanks, several are still alive and have grown considerably since their capture... Towards the end of the month the annual cleaning of the buoy took place. This year there were several tubes and worms of what is probably Sabella penicillus...There were, as before, great quantities of Caprellids, Ascidiella virginea and Crona intestinalis were present, along with the nudibranchs Face- lina drummondi, Cuthona aurantiaca, and Dendronotus arborescens...During the spring months, until towards the middle of June, Aplysia punctata was one of the commonest animals in the bay. It came up in quantities in the dredge, it was to be found commonly on the shore amongst rocks, and after a westerly wind the shore was MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN. 81 covered with masses of its spawn. After June Aplysia almost entirely disappeared, and was not found again until the end of September...The following common animals could usually be supplied alive to laboratories and museums at any time without much delay :—Actuua mesembryanthemum, Tealia crassicornis, Bunodes gemma- ceus, Actinoloba dianthus, Alcyonium digitatum, Echinus esculentus, H. miliaris, Ophiothriz fragilis, Ophiocoma mgra, Ophiura ciliaris, Arenicola marina and A. ecaudata, Nereis pelagica, Pecten maximus and P. opercularis, Doris tuberculata, Aplysia punctata (spring), Cancer pagurus, Carcinus moenas, Nephrops norvegicus, Galathea squam- afera.”’ There are of course many other animals, both common species and rarer forms, which could be obtained alive by giving a little notice, or preserved in spirit, on applying to the Hon. Director, at University College, Liverpool. The little reference library at the Station is growing gradually, but is still badly in want of many common books and pamphlets. Any works on Marine Zoology, on British Animals, or on the structure and development of marine invertebrates will be thankfully received. The Committee are much indebted to Prof. G. B. Howes who has kindly presented to the Station a series of 7 volumes of collected fishery papers—the result of the Fisheries Exhibition of 1883. Other books and pamphlets have - been received from members of the Committee, and the following books have been purchased during the year :— Baird’s British Entomostraca, Johnston’s British Mu- seum Catalogue of Worms, and Jeffrey’s British Conchol- ogy (5 vols.). PUBLICATIONS. Since the last Annual Report, we have issued Vol. IV. of the ‘‘Fauna of Liverpool Bay.” It is the largest 82 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. volume of the series and contains about 475 pages and 53 plates, several of which are coloured. In addition to the reports and papers which had been already announced as forthcoming in this volume, Vol. IV. contains a note upon the yellow variety of Sarcodictyon by Prof. Herdman, a paper on the structure of the cerata of Dendronotus by Mr. J. A. Clubb, a revision of the Amphipoda of the L. M. B.C. District by Mr. Walker, and a supplementary report on the Port Erin Nemertines by Mr. Beaumont. It ought to be noticed that although the primary objects of the Committee were originally faunistic and speciographic, yet observations on habits and life-histories, and bionomics in general, have not been neglected; and now some of our papers in this Vol. IV., such as Mr. Chadwick’s on the Vascular Systems of the Starfishes, and Mr. Clubb’s on the Cerata of Nudibranchs, are coming to deal with purely structural and morphological questions. The other Reports in this volume deal, some of them— such as Mr. Gamble’s on Turbellaria, Mr. Beaumont’s on Nemertea, and Mr. Browne’s on Meduse—with fresh groups of animals which had not been adequately discussed in the previous volumes; while others, such as Mr. Thompson’s and Mr. Walker’s reports, are welcome revisions of these authors’ own previous work on the Crustacea. Dr. Hanitsch has furnished us with a paper on the Classification and Nomenclature of British Sponges, which it may be said does not come strictly within the scope of the L.M.B.C. Reports. Still the subject matter is of such importance to anyone working systematically at our sponge fauna, and the treatment seems so well adapted to render the lists an indispensable working addition to Bowerbank’s Monograph, that I had no hesitation. in asking Dr. Hanitsch to allow the paper to be included in our series of reports upon the Fauna of Liverpool Bay. MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN. 83 As to the future, there are a number of reports upon groups, and other pieces of work, in progress. The “List of Fishes”’ is stillin hand. Mr. Andrew Scott has undertaken to collect and report upon the Ostracoda, Dr. - Hurst has still charge of our Pycnogonida; while Prof. Boyce and Prof. Herdman are engaged on an extensive investigation on Oysters in healthy and in diseased conditions which has been partly laid before the British Association, but ought to be published in full next year after some further series of observations and experiments have been made. The Infusoria of all kinds, some of the parasitic groups of Crustacea, the marine Rotifera, and some of the lower worms are still not allotted to workers; while there is plenty for many hands to do in working out the detailed distribution of genera and species, and in tabulating and discussing the results of dredging in various depths and localities. There is no need to dwell upon the large number of species now recorded, and the additions that have been made by our explorations both to the British fauna and to science; such results, though very necessary, are no longer the sole, perhaps not even the chief objects which the Committee have in view. I think all who are engaged in this L.M.B.C. work feel that it 1s growing steadily under their hands in every direction. Not only are there many animals and whole groups of animals in our sea awaiting examination and record, but there are many points of view, the speciographic, distributional, anatom- ical, physiological, embryological, bionomical and others, from which even the best known forms would well repay further and more detailed investigation; and wider problems such as the association of animals together on particular sea-bottoms and at particular depths, and other 84 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. questions of bionomics and of oceanography—some of them having important bearings upon Geology and upon Fishery questions—are now opening up before us and pressing for solution. > We are a small body, the Naturalists of Liverpool, our laboratory at Port Erin is a modest establishment with but scanty equipment, we have no State, County or Municipal subsidies, and our available funds (private subscriptions) are barely sufficient for the necessary expenses of steamer and apparatus in our explorations, and for the publication of our results; but fortunately there 1s no lack of work for us to do, work which is interesting in the doing, and work which, if we seek it earnestly and do it honestly, we cannot but believe will be of value to science, and may, through its connection with the fishing industries, be of direct benefit to mankind. . MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN, 85 APPENDIX A. LIVERPOOL MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION at PORT ERIN. REGULATIONS. I.—This Biological Station is under the control of the Liverpool Marine Biology Committee, the executive of which consists of the Hon. Director (Prof. Herdman,F.R.8.) and the Hon. Treasurer (Mr. I. C. Thompson, F.L.8.). IJ.—In the absence of the Director, and of all other members of the Committee, the Station is under the temporary control of the Resident Curator or Laboratory Assistant, who will keep the keys, and will decide, in the event of any difficulty, which places are to be occupied by workers, and how the tanks, collecting apparatus, &c., are to be employed. IlI.—The Resident Assistant will be ready at all reasonable hours and within reasonable limits to give assistance to workers at the Station, and to do his best to supply them with material for their investigations. IV.—Visitors will be admitted, on payment of a small specified charge, to see the Aquarium and the Station, so long as it is found not to interfere with the scientific work. . V.—Those who are entitled to work in the Station, when there is room, and after formal application to the Director, are:—(1) Annual subscribers of one guinea or upwards to the funds (each guinea subscribed entitling to the use of a work place for four weeks), and (2) others who are not annual subscribers, but who pay the Treasurer 86 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. 10s. per week for the accommodation and privileges. Institutions, such as Colleges and Museums, may become subscribers in order that a work place may be at the disposal of their staff for a certain period annually: a subscription of two guineas will secure a work place for six weeks in the year, a subscription of five guineas for four months, and a subscription of £10 for the whole year. ViI.—Workers at the Station can always find comfort- able and convenient quarters at the closely adjacent Bellevue Hotel; but lodgings can readily be had by those who prefer them. VII.—Each worker is entitled to a work place opposite a window in the Laboratory, and may make use of the microscopes, reagents, and other apparatus, and of the boats, dredges, tow-nets, &c., so far as 1s compatible with the claims of other workers and with the routine work of the Station. | VIII.—Each worker will be allowed to use one pint of methylated spirit per week, free. Any further amount required must be paid for. All dishes, jars, bottles, tubes, and other glass may be used freely, but must not be taken away from the laboratory. If any workers desire to make, preserve, and take away collections of marine animals and plants, they must make special arrangements with the Director or Treasurer in regard to bottles and preservatives. Although workers in the Station are free- to make their own collections at Port Erin, 11 must be clearly understood that (as in other Biological Stations) no specimens must be taken for such purposes from the . laboratory stock, nor from the Aquarium tanks, nor from the steam-boat dredging expeditions, as these specimens are the property of the Committee. The specimens in the Laboratory stock are preserved for sale, the animals in the tanks are for the instruction of visitors to the ‘MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN. 87 Aquarium, and as all the expenses of steam-boat dredging expeditions are defrayed by the Committee the specimens obtained on these occasions must be retained by the Committee (a) for the use of the specialists working at _ the Fauna of Liverpool Bay, (b) to replenish the tanks, and (c) to add to the stock of duplicate animals for sale from the Laboratory. ITX.—EHach worker at the Station is expected to lay a paper on some of his results—or at least a short report upon his work—before the Biological Society of Liverpool during the current or the following session. , X.—All subscriptions, payments, and other communi- cations relating to finance, should be sent to the Hon. Wreasurer, Mr. I. C. Thompson, F.L.8., 19, Waverley Road, Liverpool. Applications for permission to work at the Station, or for specimens, or any communications in regard to the scientific work should be made to Professor Herdman, F..RB.S., University College, Liverpool. 88 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. APPENDIX B. SUBSCRIPTIONS and DONATIONS. Subscriptions. Donations. £ 8. dG. (& sjsaee Ayre, John W., Ripponden, Halifax ... 1 1 0 — Banks, Prof. W. Mitchell, 28, Rodney-st. 2 2 0 £— Beaumont, W. I., Cambridge ~ ae — Bickersteth, Dr., 2, Rodney-st. ... sae, 2h, SO mn — Boulnois, H. P., 7, Devonshire-rd. 1 ee — Brown, Prof. J. Campbell, Univ. Coll...” 1 190 — Browne, Edward T., B.A., 141, Uxbridge- road, Shepherd’s Bush, London ... 1 1 O — Boyce, Prof., University College woes ~~ Caton, Dr., 31, Rodney-street t ag Clague, Dr., Castletown, Isle of Man ... 1 1 Clague, Thomas, Bellevue Hotel, PortHrin 1 1. 0 — Comber,Thomas,J.P., Leighton, Parkgate 1 1 Crellin, John C., J.P., Ballachurry, An- dreas, Isle of Man ... 0:10; 36 — Darbishire, R.D., Victoria- _pk., Riauon 1 1 0 4535535 Dawkins, Professor W. Boyd, Owens | | College, Manchester... i Derby, Earl of, Knowsley 5) Delius, W. Meyer, Hamburg Sarge Dumergue, A. F., 7 Montpellier-terrace 0 Gair, H. W., Smithdown-rd., Wavertree 2 Gamble,Col.C.B.,Windlehurst,St.Helens 2 if 1 if 1 il Ss oO FF 10 Gamble, F.W.,Owens College, Manchester Gaskell, Frank, Woolton Wood... ; Gaskell, Holbrook, J.P., Woolton Wood Gell, James S., High Bailiff of Castletown Gibson, Prof, R. J. H., 41, Sydenham-ay. Saeaeoacoocooqcos a See eS ee i MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN. 89 Gifford, J., Whitehouse-terrace, Edin.... 1 0 O — Gilchrist, Dr. J. D. F., Edinburgh Univ. 1 1 0 — Glynn, Dr., 62, Rodney-street ... ee A) — Greening, Linneus, 5, Wilson Patten-st., Warrington ... dee res 4) — Gotch, Prof., Museum, Gatoiae be VEO — Halls, W. J., 35, Lord-street Le de oO — Henderson, W.G., Liverpool Union Bane tou Se wa Herdman, Prof., University College nee 2 =) — Holder, Thos., 1, Clarendon-buildings, Tithebarn-street ole lt 0) — Holland, Walter, Mossley Hill- oad Jie VW) — Holt, Alfred, Crofton, Aigburth .. De Dee — Holt, George, J.P., Sudley, ically Elta bo Oe 0 — Howes, Prof. G. B., Royal College of Science, South Kensington, London 1 1 0O — Hoyle, W. E., Museum, Owens College, Manchester ... : 1, dyer) — Isle of Man Natural Hace a re -quarian Society Jones, C.W.,J.P., Field House, minedinds Kermode, P. M. O., Hill-side, Ramsey... Lea, Rev. T. Simcox, 3, Wellington-fields Leicester, Alfred, Harlow, Essex Liverpool Museum Committee ... Macfie, Robert, Airds P ss Meyer, Dr. Kuno, University Guilds ey Meade-King, H. W.,J.P., Sandfield Park Meade-King, R. R., 4, Oldhall-street Melly, W. R., 90, Chatham-street Miall, Prof., Yorkshire College, Leeds... Michael, Albert D., Cadogan Mansions, Sloane Square, London, 8.W. she to Monks, F. W., Brooklands, Warrington 1 1 Muspratt, H. K., Seaforth Hall... war ar. O Newton, John, M,R.C.S., 44, Rodney-st. 010 6 — rFaomOoNpNrRrFrHOH =) SV(Syey (2a (Se (Sy Son oa) SS) RPrROrFRrOrFRNHHHP HH ao SS ea 90 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Poole, Sir James, Tower Buildings 2! Deo — Rathbone,§8.G.,Croxteth-drive,Sefton-pk. 2 2 0 — Rathbone, Mrs. Theo., Backwood, Neston 1 1 O — Rathbone, Miss May, Backwood, Neston 1 1 0 — Rathbone, W., Greenbank, Allerton 2 20 — Roberts, Isaac, F.R.S., Crowborough ... 1 1 O — Shaw, Prof. H. 8. Hele, Ullet-road her 0 — Shepheard, T., Kingsley Lodge, Chester 1 1 0 — Simpson,J. Hope, Annandale, Aigburth-dr 2 2 0 — Smith, A. T., junr., 24, King-street 1 yd ao — Talbot, Rev. T. U., 4, Osborne-terrace, Douglas, Isle of Man Ly 16530 —- Thompson, Isaac C., 19, Waverley- aoa 2 20 — Thornely, James, Baycliff, Woolton 1 hee — Thornely, The Misses, Baychff, Woolton 1 1 0 — Toll, J. M., 340, Walton Breck-road Ty il ae — Turnbull, Thos. 8., 18, Spring-gardens, Manchester ... 1 0% -— Walker, A. O., Nant-y- eee Galen Bay 3 go oe) — Walker, Horace, South Lodge, Princes-pk. Walters, Rev. Frank, B.A., King William College, Isle of Man.. iL ee Watson, A. T., Tapton- oeenate Sheffield ee! Weiss, Prof. F. H.,Owen’s College, Man’tr. 1 1 Westminster, Duke of, Haton Hall ~~... 5 O 20 il rah _ (ap) | White, Prof., University College, Bangor Wiglesworth, Dr., Rainhill "anor “HLIWS WL ‘V 001l09 punof pwo pazipnrye 0 Sale 'C68L SIE waquaeg “looauaxAT'T : ‘UHUASVAUT, “NO ‘NOSANOHL ‘0 OVYSI SOlVYG “SOD oso] OL[Qug SURUIIO A, YS —! pung JUSWY4SeAUT JUOTUMOpUT ZV Sole £ Vl Sole G OL 0 eee eee ee eee ere ee eee eee eee eee eee) solipung ce Z eT g Dee eeeeeenceeeeee 6é 3 ce “c ‘saredayy 6c G eT G ee ee eo ees ass wa ENTS GOT enp DOURTV 66 0 0 GT ene uss nese OUP ETS [Bolsoporg UlIg qog jo quoy ese Gee Cae tn eee ees UME Tl) Oy Se OTSE TCU [)Ivemier PE OG ct Log L10pBIOGeT pu IOZBING ‘sottepeg SS 6 61 0 Cn i i i “dS91OqU] yued (7 Tat 9T ¢g ee i) “on” ‘suouttoadg jo OSRLIIRO ‘95R4S0q ce SETS ella RRS ORES PA AEE tg i SIMOCOy 7O OaQ & SL OL worgeqg peorsojporg wiry 410g ye suqeieddy pur syoog ‘* 6 SI G PONG OAR OR aC OR CREM Son eu pata 9 1 0 pines is te at gah ghee aio k pei dah ec li 2 qeog ce “O79 SNOT O[QNUT SURMyIO\A Ys ‘pueptaiq ‘‘ L sl eo ccc saortpedxg SuiSpeiq jo sesuedxg ‘‘ 9 8 GOL “poatooor ATTRNGJoR suoTyeUOG pu suoydtiosque ‘* Ole men etre Li a ae “+ Klauoteig pur Suyuug * V4 OL OL Fe oes e setae LOLs Rom “Aste ‘00 “purty, Ul oouRl eg kg 6 LT 0Z aiWelalatalWaatatapesiura hi eiutate everein’ ale'e “O99 ‘soqetg ‘s.10 ay Suu OL “Pe 8) oe “G68T cb: op Simcer “C68T "1D ‘UUYASVEUT ‘NOH ‘NOSANWOHL ‘O OVVSI HIIM INQO00V NI 1G GALLINNOO AONOTOIA ANTAVN TOOdYAATT AHL 92 FREE-SWIMMING COPEPODA from the WEST COAST of IRELAND. By Isaac C. THompson, F.L.S. [Read January 10th, 1896.] A NuMBER of small bottles (eighteen bottles in all) containing tow-net material have been recently handed to me for examination and identification by my friend Mr. Edward T. Browne, B.A., of London, he having collected them off Valencia on the West of Ireland during the summer and autumn of 1895. They represent the results of sixteen separate days collecting, the dates being April 5, 8, 10, 12, 13, 15, 16, 18, 27, 29, May 5, 8, 14, 27, June 27, July @7Sepmeae and Oct. 16, and these corresponding to gatherings Nos. 1 to 18 consecutively (see Table I., at end). Mr. Browne writes ‘I did not preserve every tow- netting taken, or keep the whole, but only a sample of it.” The sizes of the bottles varied from 2 drms. up to 2 oz., the preservative material used being in most cases a 5% solution of formalin, the merits of which I shall have occasion to refer to later on. It is to be regretted that ‘‘only a sample” of the haul was retained, as experience has often demonstrated that although the mass of a tow-netting may contain mainly one or a very few species, rarer species may occur isolated throughout it, and the very last dip sometimes contains an unexpected prize. So that although the process is slow and tedious, it is always advisable to examine as much as possible, and the careful observer will generally find himself rewarded by so doing. ue GOPEPODA FROM WEST OF IRELAND. 93 The free-swimming Copepoda of our coasts vary in size from about 1 mm. to 4 mm. in length. The mode of examination which I have found the best and quickest is as follows :—After carefully shaking the material in the bottle a quantity is poured into a shallow open glass plate about 4 inches long, 2 inches wide andjinch deep. Sucha plate (which I have been able to obtain only from Messrs. Cogit & Co., Paris,) is curved inside like a watch-glass" and the contents can be rapidly gone over by means of a strong lens, or a simple dissecting microscope, or still better on the large flat stage of a Swift’s Stephenson Binocular Microscope, using a 2 inch objective. Every portion is thus systematically examined, and those animals identified or required for further examination are easily picked out with a very fine needle, or better with the lower part of a cat’s whisker cut flat at the end and mounted. The material of Mr. Browne’s collection may all be classed as ‘‘ Littoral Plankton’ being taken at the surface or at a depth of from 1 to 5 fathoms, one only of the number (No. 5) being taken at a depth of from 5 to 15 fathoms. As before stated Nos. 1 to 10 were collected during the month of April, Nos. 11 to 14 during May and the others during June, July, September, and October. The local- ities are very adjacent to each other, the greater number of the tow-nettings having been taken in Valencia Harbour, and the rest off Beginnis Island and Donlus Bay. ‘'T'wenty-two species of Copepoda in all were found. In order to conveniently show their distribution and abundance or scarcity I have tabulated them, the numbers running in the order of dates (Table I.). One species only, Calanus finmarchicus was common to all and it formed nearly the entire bulk of many of the 94 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. earlier bottles. As the main food of the Greenland whale, this species is very abundant in Arctic Seas and is commonly found around our coasts during the winter and spring, becoming scarce or almost disappearing during the warmth of summer. The more delicate free-swimmers Ozthona spinifrons and Acartia clausw on the contrary it will be seen both appear in the middle of April (No. 6) and continue generally present in the subsequent tow-nettings through- out the summer. A reference to the distribution table will show that the late autumn gathering of October 16th was much the most prolific in species, fifteen species being then taken. Six of the species found are decided rare, O0ze Metridia armata, Candace pectinata, Pseudocalanus arm- atus, Monstrilla rigida, Coryceus specitosus, and Oncea mediterranea. The first named, a few specimens occurring in Nos. 11 and 17 and 18, is usually a surface animal and its first recorded British habitats are in the Valencia neigh- bourhood (Brady’s ‘“‘ Free and Semi-parastic Copepoda of the British Islands,” Vol. I., p. 42). I have taken it very sparingly in Liverpool Bay and in parts of the Clyde, and Scott reports it from the Forth. Candace pectinata occurs in four gatherings, Nos. 5,14 and 16,and18. It is usually found at a considerable depth below the surface as is the case with No. 5 specimen; I have found it in tow-nettings taken off the Ross of Mull at 55 fathoms, and about the surface off Oban, and plentifully in the Mediterranean. Monstrilla rigida, a single specimen of which occurs in No. 7 has not yet disclosed its life-history. From the absence of functional parts and especially of mouth organs, the species of this mysterious genus seem to give evidence of some other phase of existence, although so far as I am aware no such phase has hitherto been ; 4 : 4 ‘ »_ COPEPODA FROM WEST OF IRELAND. Gd discovered nor have they been recorded as parasitic on any other animal. A single specimen of Anomalocera patersonii occurred in No. 16 bottle. This large and very striking species is very variable in its distribution, often occurring in immense profusion, but is otherwise uncommon. On more than one occasion I have seen the surface of the sea, for many miles around the Isle of Man, so densely covered with this animal as to make it distinctly recog- nizable from the ship’s side, and its beautiful coloration is well known to microscopists. Pseudocalanus armatus a few specimens of which I found in No. 18 is usually a deep swimmer and never common. | ; The occurrence of the two southern species Coryceus speciosus and Oncea mediterranea is specially interesting as indicating most probably Gulf Stream influence. So far as I am aware the former is new to Britain although it is quite possible that it may have been mistaken for C. anglicus, Lubbock, which it strongly resembles. The position of the eyes and the strongly divergent caudal stylets in these specimens seem to clearly indicate its identity with Coryceus speciosus, Dana. I found several specimens, some with ovisacs, in No. 18 only, so it appears to have arrived at the end of an unusually hot summer and would probably succumb to the first cold. Oncea mediterranea was found sparingly by Mr. G. C. Bourne, M.A., near Plymouth, in 1889 (Report on the Pelagic Copepoda collected at Plymouth in 1888-9), but I am not aware that it has hitherto been reported elsewhere in Great Britain or indeed north of the Mediterranean. I have found it common about the Canary Islands. 'T'wo or three specimens only, occurred in No. 18. The other | 96 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. species found are none of them specially noteworthy and are mostly common around our coasts. } | In connexion with this collection I would refer naturalists to a paper by Prof. Herdman, F.R.S., entitled ‘‘ The Biological Results of the Cruise of the S.Y. ‘ Argo’ round the West Coast of Ireland,” in August, 1890 (Trans. L’pool Biol. Soc., Vol. V., p. 181). The tow-net material obtained on the “‘ Argo’s”’ cruise was placed in my hands for examination by Prof. Herdman, the results being given in his paper. As a supplement to the present paper I have thought it might be of advantage to other workers on the West Coast to transcribe from Dr. Herdman’s paper the tabular statement of the distribution of Copepoda at twelve localities visited by the ‘‘ Argo.” The comparative scarcity of Calanus finmarchicus in the ‘“‘ Argo” collection and the prevalence of Acartia clausw and Orthona spinifrons quite bears out the remarks above made respecting the distribution of those crustaceans. Of the 82 ‘‘ Argo”’ species, 15 occur also in the Valencia tow-nettings (see Table IT.). Both collections, but more especially that of Valencia, furnish evidence of the truth of the remarks made by Prof. Herdman in his Presidential Address to the Biological Section at the Ipswich Meeting of the British Association as to the relatively large number of genera of animals represented by the species, in shallow waters, and its bearing on the Darwinian principle that an animal’s most potent enemies are its own close allies. In the Valencia eroup the 22 species recorded belong to 18 genera, the genera being therefore to the species as 9 to 11, and in the ‘‘ Argo”’ group 32 species belong to 23 genera or less than 3 to 4. The difference between the two collections in this respect is probably to be accounted for from the fact that the ‘‘ Argo”’ collection, besides covering a widely COPEPODA FROM WEST OF IRELAND. 97 distant area, included a number of ground dwelling, copepoda, or those which are not generally free-swimmers, and would not therefore be brought so much into com- petition with one another in the struggle for existence as the altogether free-swimmers. Of the latter class may be instanced the genera Harpacticus, Peltidium, Laophonte, and Cletodes each of which furnish 2 or 3 species. I have expressed regret that there was not a larger quantity of material for examination, and have the further regret that we had not dredged deposits from the various localities, for it is to this source mainly that we must look for new species, as has been recently so well exemplified by Messrs. T. and A. Scott in the Clyde area. As this is a report on the Copepoda only, I need only briefly refer to the other organisms found in the bottles. Most noteworthy was the profusion of Appendicularia especially in the spring tow-nettings, where they formed a large percentage of the bulk. The large number of small Medusz was a conspicuous feature and will no doubt not have escaped the attention of so acute an observer as Mr.. Browne himself. Larval Decapoda and Sagitta were also abundant throughout. As before stated a 5 % solution of formaldehyde (formalin) was the preservative used, and the result is all that can be desired and quite confirms my own previous experience of its valuable preservative properties. A drawback to its use when the preserved object is required to be mounted for the microscope is the shrinkage caused to the more delicate forms on removal to Farrants medium or glycerine jelly, though probably this might be overcome by the use of an intermediate solution containing a smaller percentage of glycerine. In conclusion may I express the hope that while heartily thanking Mr. Browne, he or some other natur- 98 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. VALENCIA TOW-NETTINGS— —_———— | | Ee ile fe 1 2 2 f, Date, Locality and Depth (where not stated =surface), April 5. do. April 10. 2 fe April, April 16. N. side Beginnis Is. Valencia Hbr. Calanus finmarchicus Pseudocalanus elongatus.. P., armatus... Centropages hamatus...... | C. CUMUCWIS! Nee: Temora longicornis NSLS CLOMUDOS secyeuma se dames Candace pectinata Metridia armata ......... COTA CLOUSTD iy. sae (= Dias longirenns) Anomalocera patersoni.. Parapontella brevicorms. Oithona spinifrons Ehalestris PpeHea@ a0. T. longumana Laophonte curticauda ... Harpacticus chelrfer Monstrilla rigida ......... Lictinosoma atlanticum... i. Spinipes ...... CoryC@us SpeCrosus.......+. Oncea mediterranea x MS KG KX eee ees eee eeceves 99 COPEPODA FROM WEST OF IRELAND. TABLE I, COPEPODA. Piste SUTION OF % ae | XX XXX XXX X Moe oe “Oana © | eee | ORS eee Cena x S | ich | x xX x < Dal enh A Melee ok Ot eo ee a ree lag | a ee ca aS x x Bal wap | x x x x x 3 cpa | OX x - si | es | apis x X 2 Vey | x x Se OEE SS RF S | eas | x X x x co | Perla | sO > ete i a bh a (100 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. “ARGO” TOW-NETTINGS— - genie (From Prof. Herdman’s paper ‘‘ The Biological | round the West Coast of Ireland,” in August, 1890. Number in List. 1 2 3, 4 3 oO Localit 3 ocality. = a e) Lough Swilly. —_— ————_—————— ee SPECIES. : CONGIAS JOUIMMGTCRACIS teach aa eee Xx Pscudocalanus ClOnGGGS ..-- asa2 eer re x LE CHOORG LOMGLCOTMUS. ~ 1.19... Se aeener eae x CONTTOPAGES WAMGLUS Vm... bare: Eee x C. LUNDUCN Se An. oi ai shatter e DEMS LONGUCMIS: «00h. maken) ean ee eee Xx IDE \AGISOOUG OGUS (s.r E58 co 8 eee RSCQS CUUOUD CS... 5 Mora aitea een ele) iene SORE | Pontelda wollastont we... ssn eee PAV ODORLEUG: DT CUUCOTIES Ni. eee ee x x OLENONG SPINL/ CONS he Gene “come eee x PseudocyGlops ObtUSUs® lcs: es tec eee Ti CUNOSOMG AUONMTICUIN. acsearle ff. CRYLRVOPS Peon5 bo cne eee i. SDUWUDC Sp Iecogee- Ee mateo ee eae Longipedia coronata......... ae ee o. Cyclopuna (WulOralis: 4. mie: ton. eee x el CUD UCCECUS (OM CLUPCT ). Wes) ce spisetan ay arene do. Val. GTACUUS oo SR Grlbins. — 1: nas meee NUCL PUGCOL ON eis teer. Aire A eo 5 - TOSSES MORO TMU, Vena tean: (ere er TO AYO LYUMECH. 2.5 ema aoe oee tate iPelisd gn -ACOVESSUIN x..vin,nectccleasee ee Ae P. DUCT TUDO eles 2. ioe ee ese LIGOPRONLE SUMAULUS <.eoue mcd. setae eee ITF CUTIUCOUGG, "ated gee eee ify, LONGUCHUDG pecan cae eS: Cletodes WIRtCOlG Bai me. cere nee Os MOMCOTUS “ak ald, ei ie ee ene Monstrilla T1gid@. 2h. Assiecs ae eke Porcellidium subrotundwm 22. ..00001+s00s COMGUS TOPO eet ide cio tots ne eens aaa 101 COPEPODA FROM WEST OF IRELAND. — (ea) © Ay = PA (@ Se) Ey © Zi (S) eI HH i a | co eal op) i=l A fiesulis of the Cruise of the S.Y. ‘ Argo”’ Trans. Biol. Soc., L’ pool, Vol. V., p. 181.) Tasie IT. R | —yledueyy | SX x ex x ! ee ea ee wee meee on ean ieee! ieee cae ae es cog eS x xx xX | “py Atoyqvog | KX xe xo xx XXX Cd eee oe eS Me SE eS ee eee : | seeataee | xe sxx x x X x E | ‘Ang Semen | x x “4 a | Keg Axe ty | ee eee x 19 | ‘ssoq ATTY | i ex . MOG ae = "Oe Py an > 102 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. ‘ alist, mnaly O74) future occasion, be able top procure ¢ ae < ——- the localities referred to in ne age SO ee we may 5 x have *the opportunity of becoming acquainted with the — more sedentary forms of Copepoda as we now are e with” 4 the free-swimmers of this district. ie _ The two Tables show the distribution of the Valencia — and the ‘‘Argo”’ Copepoda arranged according to localities | " .. Pe and dates. r: Ms ‘t a 7 ; a | 103 Report on the Investigations carried on in 1895 in connection with the LANCASHIRE SEA-FISHERIES LaporaTory at University College, Liverpool. By Professor W. A. Herpman, D.8c., F.R.S., and Mr. Anprew Scott, Fisheries Assistant. With Plates I.—YV. INTRODUCTORY. THE work that can be done in the application of Zoological Science to the local Fishing industries seems spreading and increasing in amount each year; and the work of the past year, as may be seen from this Report, has opened up much fresh ground, and has been carried on not only in Liverpool and at Sea but also partly at Port Erin and to a slighter extent in the neighbourhood of Piel Island, near Barrow; and so has extended over the various parts of our northern district of the Irish Sea. In fact we may be regarded now as having, planned out, if not yet completely established, a system of Fisheries investigations which, although still on a small scale, will be able to cover the ground effectively and to cope adequately with the subject. The central laboratory at University College, Liverpool, the Marine Biological Station at Port Erin, the steamer at sea, and the new branch laboratory now being fitted up at Piel Island can subdivide the work between them, and so render possible a wider range of observations. The finer microscopic and laboratory work, the com- parison of results and the drafting of reports can only be carried on at a place like the Liverpool laboratory where 104 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. microscopes, microtomes and other laboratory apparatus are available, where there are biological libraries to consult, and where there are other scientific workers to lend their help. The Biological Station at Port Erin affords facilities for practical work on the shore and for observations and experiments on the reproduction and rearing of young marine animals in tanks. Such observa- tions will prepare the way for the proposed Sea-Fish Hatchery for which Port Erin seems pre-eminently fitted. The trawling observations, the examination of the spawning and feeding grounds, and the collection of statistics can only be carried out by the steamer at sea, under the direction of Mr. Dawson, as has been done in the past. Finally, the little laboratory now being fitted up at Piel Island will enable us to examine more systematically the great shell-fish beds of the northern district and to deal with fresh material brought in from that neighbourhood before it is preserved and sent on to the central laboratory at Liverpool. Section I. of the following report, dealing with the foods of fishes, found by an investigation of the stomach contents, is in continuation of the work of previous yen and has been drawn up by Mr. Scott. Section II., on the investigation of the tidal and other currents, ce might affect the distribution of floating fish eges and fish food, by means of “drift bottles,” is a further account of the observations commenced last year and already discussed in a preliminary manner in the Ninth Annual Report of the Port Erin Biological Station. The results are now given more fully, and certain practical conclusions are drawn from them. Iam myself respons for this section. 7 A new line of enquiry has been commenced this year by sending Mr. Scott to examine some of the shell-fish SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 105 beds of the district periodically, and bring back material consisting of shell-fish, of various sizes, and samples of the sea-bottom and sea-water, from which when fully examined in the laboratory a report can be drawn up on the condition of the beds. Section III., dealing with this investigation and giving lists of the organisms found on the beds has been drawn up by Mr. Scott. This can only be regarded as a first instalment of our report on the shell-fish beds, and the work will be continued during the present year. It need scarcely be pointed out that the branch laboratory on Piel Island will be of material assistance to us in examining the beds of the northern part of the district. Mr. Scott in the course of his examination of the mud from these mussel beds and of deposits from other parts of our district—notably the neighbourhood of Port Erin—has come upon a number of minute animals, chiefly Copepoda, not hitherto recognised as living in our district and some of them new to Science. These are described by Mr. Scott in Section IV. and are figured in Plates I. to V. Section V. contains a preliminary account of the inves- tigations now being carried on, partly in the Liverpool laboratory and partly at Port Erin, by Professor Boyce and myself, upon the conditions under which Oysters live healthily, and upon the supposed connection between oysters and disease—especially typhoid fever. It may be noted that in addition to the enquiry into the subject of the great ‘“‘ Oyster and Typhoid” scare, we have made many observations upon the different kinds of oysters grown or laid down in our neighbourhood, and the effect upon them of different kinds of water. During last summer, I gave a Course of Free Lectures under the auspices of the Sea-Fisheries Committee and in accordance with the regulations of the University 106 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Extension Scheme. The course was on “Our Edible Sea-Fish and Sea-Fisheries,’’ and the lectures were delivered in the Zoology Theatre of University College on Monday evenings, commencing May 6th. The course was well attended, and the audience expressed much interest in the subject, many of them staying on at the conclusion of each lecture to examine the microscopic and other specimens and to ask questions. These lectures were not intended for, and were not attended by, fishermen alone, but were open to the general public; and I am convinced that it is fully as important for the future of Fisheries investigation and improvement and of just legislation in regard to the fisheries, that the general public should have opportunities of learning the truth in regard to the habits and life-histories of food fishes, and the inter-relations of animals in the sea, as it 1s that the fisherman himself should be instructed in such matters. In addition to such public lectures, there is another method by which an educated public opinion upon Fishery questions can be formed, and that is by the establishment in each district of a technical museum or collection illustrating the local fisheries, the spawn and other stages in the life-history of the various fishes, their foods, their parasites, their diseases, and so on. Such a collection could now readily be formed, with very slight additional expenditure, at University College, in connection with the Fisheries Laboratory, and would then be available for consultation by fishermen, fishmongers, and all others concerned. It would be of constant use to ourselves, _ for comparison, in our fishery work; it ought to be of value to Fisheries inspectors and superintendents and to members of Sea-Fisheries Committees both in this neighbourhood and from other parts of the country; and it is the practical evidence that Fisheries experts from SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 107 q abroad especially desire to see when they come for information in regard to our local Fisheries and the conditions under which they are carried on. Finally, such a technical museum of the Fisheries c , 4 eo ee | hh Oe . would naturally be made the scene and the means of object lessons and set demonstrations to the fishermen of the neighbourhood, and would probably be the most effective method of supplying technical instruction to that class of the community. ; W. A. HERDMAN. _ JANUARY, 1896. 108 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. SECTION I. ; | EXAMINATION OF Foop In FisHEs’ STOMACHS. (By Mr. ANDREW Scort.) | WE have continued the examination of the stomachs of the various marine animals whose life-histories we are more intimately concerned with, chiefly from a fisheries point of view, and to which we have been paying considerable attention durimg the past few years, but as we now know fairly well what forms the chief food supply of these particular animals in our district, we do not deal with this part of the work in such an exhaustive manner as formerly and content ourselves by merely giving a summary of the results, noting any points of special interest connected with them. During the past twelve months, from the beginning of January to the end of December, 1,540 stomachs of various marine animals from different parts of the district have been examined. The following are the sources from which the stomachs have been obtained :— Food fishes up to three imches 24-5). 487 - ha. DOME Se hana ee — 498 Oper MSWES ws seas o.uny Soe oe nem oe eee 20 COGKIES. 5 bine ais oss so.auae caw Oeeee ee Un eee 210 MISS El Si sence swine cieSalceguaniee oe Cee ee ee 230 Siar ii PS ition cat ec Ne ane anon eee een 100 1,540 THE Foop oF YounG FIsHEs. _ The following summaries give the result of the examin- ation of 487 stomachs of young food fishes, the differences between the year 1895 and the previous years, if any, being stated ;— SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 109 Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa). 167 stomachs of young Plaice were examined, of these 36 were empty and 1 contained indistinguishable animal matter, leaving 130 to be accounted for as having _ recognisable matter. Crustacea were found in 65 stomachs, exactly 50 %, and consisted of the remains of Amphipods and Copepods, 51 stomachs contained numbers of the Copepod Jonesiella hyena, a species described by Mr. I. C. Thompson some years ago and which has since been found to enter very largely into the food supply of the young flat fishes. Annelida were also found in 65 stomachs, 50%. The stomachs examined last year and referred to in the Third Annual Report, gave a somewhat different result. Crustacea took first place with fully 63 %, Annelida second with 30 %, while 4 % of the stomachs contained Mollusca. So that it is quite clear that Crustacea and Annelida are the chief food supplying agents of the young plaice, and of the two, Crustacea is probably the more important. | Dab (Pleuronectes lumanda). 272 stomachs of young Dabs were examined, of which 226 were found to contain no food and 11 contained food matter which was not recognisable, leaving only 35 to be accounted for. Annelida were found in 34 stomachs, or fully 97 %. Echinoderms were found in 1 stomach, representing scarcely 3 %. In last year’s report 65 % of the stomachs of young Dabs examined contained Annelida, and 24 % Crustacea, so that Annelida appears to be by far the most important food supplying agent of the young Dabs, Crustacea occupying second place. Flounder (Plewronectes flesus). 5 stomachs of young Flounders were examined, of which 3 were empty and 2 contained the remains of Annelida. 110 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Sole (Solea vulgaris). 5 young Soles were examined; and the stomachs were found to be empty. Cod (Gadus morrhua). | 10 stomachs of young Cod were examined, 7 of which were empty and 3 contained the remains of Crustacea. Whiting (Gadus merlangus). 6 stomachs of young Whiting were examined. all of which were empty. Sprats (Clupea spratta). 21 stomachs of young Sprats were examined, all of which were empty. Last year’s report shows that out of 20 Sprats only 2 contained recognisable food, so that we have still to find out what the Sprats feed upon. Foop oF LARGER FISHES. Plaice (Plewronectes platessa). 153 stomachs of Plaice were examined, of which 43 were empty and 2 contained indistinguishable animal matter, leaving 108 to be accounted for. Annelida were found in 68 stomachs, or nearly 63 %. Mollusca were found in 36 stomachs, fully 33 %, and consisted of Solen, Philine, Mactra, Cardium and Mytilus. The shell-fish beds are without doubt a good feeding sround for the smaller flat and round fishes, as we frequently find the remains of Cockles and Mussels as well as Annelida in the stomachs of the fish caught in the vicinity of the shell-fish beds, so that the protection and cultivation of the more important shell-fish would be a - means of increasing the food supply for the smaller sizes of the valuable food fishes. Fish were found in 7 stomachs, or about 63 %, and consisted chiefly of sand eels. Last year’s report showed that Mollusca were the SHA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. gai most important food supplying agent of the Plaice, as fully 72 % of the stomachs contained the remains of various shell-fish, Annelida were second 22 % and Crustacea third with 8 %. Dabs (Pleuronectes lumanda). 176 stomachs of Dabs were examined, of which 70 were empty and 13 contained unrecognisable animal matter, leaving 93 to be accounted for. 32 stomachs contained Mollusca, or fully 34 %, the Mollusca consisted of the remains of Buccinwm, Cardium, Mactra, Mytilus, Philine and Nucula. Here again we also find the smaller sizes of dabs, such as are caught in the shrimp nets, &c., feeding on the young Cockles and Mussels which they pick up on the shell-fish beds. 24 stomachs contained remains of Annelida, nearly 26 %. 23 stomachs contained remains of Crustacea, or nearly 25%, and consisted of Crangon, Pagurus, Portunus and various Amphipoda. 6 stomachs contained remains of Echinoderms, nearly 7%, and consisted chiefly of the sand starfish, Ophioglypha. 9 stomachs contained remains of fish, nearly 10 %, and . were mostly composed of sand eels, but 1 stomach contained a number of fish eggs. 1 stomach contained remains of a Zoophyte. Last year’s report gave Annelida as first with 50 %, then Echinoderms, Mollusca, Crustacea and Zoophytes with 21%, 20 % and 15 % respectively. In the previous year (1893) Mollusca were found to be the chief food. Flounders (Plewronectes flesus). 20 stomachs of Flounders were examined 15 of which were empty, the remainder, 5, contained fragments of Annelida. Soles (Solea vulgaris). 40 stomachs of Soles were examined of which 27 were 112 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Sree and 6 contained matter nore so that only 7 out of the 40 contained food. 4 stomachs contained remains of Annelida. 2 stomachs contained remains of Crustacea. 1 stomach contained Mollusca. Last year’s report gave Annelida as being the most useful food supplying agent of this valuable food fish, Crustacea being second, so that it seems clear, that on the whole Annelida form a very important item in the food of the Sole. It may be stated here that by far the ee. number of Soles examined in this district are found to have no food in the stomachs. | Cod (Gadus morrhua). _ 80 stomachs of Cod were examined, of which 13 were empty, the remainder contained recognisable food matter. Crustacea were found in 12 stomachs, or fully 70 %. Fish were found in 4 stomachs, nearly 23 %. Annelida were found in only 1 stomach. Last year 90% of the stomachs examined contained Crustacea, Fish being again second with 12 %, and Annelida third. Whiting (Gadus merlangus). 74 stomachs of Whiting were examined, of which 38 were empty, and 5 contained unrecognisable food matter, leaving 81 to be accounted for. Crustacea were found in 13 stomachs, or nearly 43 %. Annelids were found in 8 stomachs, or fully 9 %. Fish were also found in 3 stomachs, or fully 9 %. Mollusca were found in 2 stomachs, or nearly 7 %. In last year’s report, Crustacea were found to occupy the first place with fully 73 %, Fish second with 24 % and Annelida third with 7 %. SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 1t3 Haddock (Gadus ceglefinus). 32 stomachs of Haddock were examined of which 9 were empty, and 1 contained unrecognisable food matter, leaving 22 to be accounted for. Crustacea were found in 12 stomachs, or fully 54 %. Fish were found in 6 stomachs, or fully 27 %. Mollusca were found in 3 stomachs, or fully 13 %. Annelida were found in 2 stomachs, or fully 9 %. From last year’s Report it will be seen that Mollusca. occupied the first place with fully 54 %, Echinoderms second with 21 %, Annelida and Crustacea third with fully 18 % each. Thornback Skate (Rata clavata). 17 stomachs were examined of which 4 were empty, and 1 contained unrecognisable animal matter, leaving 12 to be accounted for as having contained recognisable food. material. _ Crustacea were found in 8 stomachs, or fully 66 %. Mollusca were found in 3 stomachs, or 25 %. _ Fish were also found in 8 stomachs, 25 %. _ Last year’s report shows that fully 97 % of the stomachs of the Skate contained Crustacea, Mollusca occupying second place with 16%, and Fish third with 10 %, so that as far as our results go they show that the Thornback Skate in our district feed largely upon Crustacea such as Crangon, Carcinus, Galathea, Hyas, Nephrops, Portunus, Pagurus and a species of Amphipoda, probably Ampelisca spinipes, Boeck. We have also examined the stomachs of a number of other more or less important food fishes, such as the “Lemon Sole” (Pleuronectes microcephalus), ‘‘ Long Rough Dab” (Hippoglossoides limandoides), ‘‘ Grey Gur- nard” (T'rigla gurnardus), “Starry Ray” (Raia radiata), “Grey Skate” (Raza batis), but not in sufficient numbers to make them worth while recording. 114 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. A number of the inedible fishes (fishes of no marketable value) such as the ‘‘ Solenette’’ (Solea lutea), ‘‘ Megrim”’ (Arnoglossus laterna), ‘“‘ Pogge” (Agonus cataphractus) etc., have been examined with the view of obtaining fresh information regarding their habits and food, so that we may have some idea as to what extent they compete with the more valuable food fishes of this district. In the stomach of one of the Solenettes a young Sole, measuring ~ of an inch, was found, which is the first direct evidence we have from this district of Solenettes feeding upon young Soles. Whether or not this happens to any great extent it is difficult to say. CONCLUSION. If we take into consideration the results of the four years work of examining stomachs and compare one year with another we find, as a rule, that each particular species of fish is fairly consistent in preferring one kind of animal as food. There are times, however, when unusual animals may form a large proportion of the food, and this may well be due to a temporary scarcity of the usual foods or a temporary abundance of the forms substituted. Such variations in food matters may have considerable influence upon the movements of fishes within our district. SECTION Al. THE Drirt BoTTLES AND SURFACE CURRENTS. (By Professor HERDMAN.) In last year’s report the scheme for the distribution of drift bottles over the Irish Sea, for the purpose of helping to determine the set of the chief currents, tidal or other- eS eel Se ee eee ee eee = . SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. les wise, which might influence the movements of fish food and fish embryos, was fully explained. Since September, 1894, this work has been going on actively, and at the end of about twelve months over one thousand drift bottles in all had been set free. Many of them have _ been let out at intervals of ten minutes, or quarter of an hour, or twenty minutes (corresponding to distances of from 3 to 6 miles apart) from the Isle of Man boats when crossing between Liverpool and Douglas—a very con- venient line of 75 miles across the middle of the widest part of our area, traversing the ‘‘head of the tide”’ or meeting place of the tidal currents entering by St. George’s Channel and the North Channel. Others have been let off from Mr. Alfred Holt’s steamers, in going round from Liverpool to Holyhead and in coming down from Greenock. Mr. Dawson on the Fisheries steamer ‘‘ John Fell” has distributed a number along the coast in various parts of the district, and the Fisheries bailiffs have let off some dozens from their small boats. Other series have been set free at stated intervals during the rise and fall of the tide from the Morecambe Bay Light Vessel in the northern part of our area, north of the ‘‘ head of the tide;”’ and, through the kindness of Lieutenant M. Sweny, R.N., a similar periodic distribution has taken place from the Liverpool North-West Light Vessel, to the south of the “head of the tide.’ Others, finally, have been despatched by Mr. Robert Harley, by Mr. R. Li. Ascroft, by Mr. Andrew Scott and a few friends in other parts of the area from small boats and on our dredging expeditions, in some cases between the Isle of Man and Ireland. Altogether we have pretty well covered this northern area of the Irish Sea in our distribution of floating bottles. Mr. Ascroft has also let off fifty larger and heavier bottles, champagne quarts weighted with sand so as to 116 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. float almost entirely submerged, and with a post card _ attached to the end of the cork. Nearly 30 9%, of these _ have been returned; most were set free in the northern part of the district, and about 10 % have come south— e.g., No. 34, set free off Duddon outer buoy (Cumberland) - on 9th May, was found at Wallasey embankment - (Cheshire) on the 18th of May—thus differing from our - smaller bottles (see below) which have largely gone north. Possibly this difference in result may be due to the. weighted champagne bottles having floated lower in the water or having been carried along near the bottom. Some of them are said to have sunk out of sight when | set free, and one was trawled up from 12 miles S.E. of. the Bahama Light Ship from a depth of 14 fathoms. The first small bottles used, and the printed paper they contained, were described last year. We afterwards — adopted a rather larger size of bottle, 8°5 cm. in length; and, after various postal difficulties and experiments, we — hit upon a convenient size and thickness of private post — card, which, ready stamped and addressed, and marked . with a distinguishing letter or number, is rolled up in its | bottle, and has printed on its back the following — For scientific enquiry into the currents of the Sea. Whoever finds this is earnestly requested to write distinctly the DATE and LOCALITY, with full particulars, in the space below, and to put the card in the nearest post office. eoeeeeree eee ee eeee eee eee eee eeeesesesreeeeee ves eeseeoeeeeeoesseseses eee eee @eoeoeseere ese eee eee eee eee ees eee eee see eee seeseeseeeeeeeeseeeseeee ees eee eee DATE, When found... ..c5cc0.0-.s0+. fourth pair, X 150, 18, Foot of fifth pair, x SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. iy, 300. 19. Foot of fifth pair, male, xX 300. 20. Abdomen and caudal stylets, x 90. Idya elongata, n. sp. Fig. 21. Posterior foot-jaw, xX 380. 22. Foot of fifth pair, female, X 115. 28. Foot of fifth pair, male, X 115. 24. Appendage to the first ab- - dominal segment, x 115. PLATE V. Idya elongata, n. sp. Fig. 1. Female seen from above, x 64. 2. Antennule, * 253. 3. Antennule, male, xX 253. 4. Foot first pair of swimming feet, X 190. 5. Foot fourth pair, x 190. Collocheres elegans, n. sp. Fig. 6. Female seen from above, X 52. 7. Antennule, x 133. 8. Antenna, xX 170. 9. Mandible, x 953. 10. Maxilla, x 170. 11. Anterior foot- jaw, X 170. 12. Posterior foot-jaw, x 170. 13. Foot of first pair of swimming feet, x 125. 14. Foot of fourth pair, X 125. 15. Foot of fifth pair, x 190. Ascomyzon thompson, n. sp. Fig. 16. Female seen from above, X 50. 17. Antennule, = 1la0. 18. Antenna, x 190.. 19: Mandible;