byoee raeoroe lobyre: Sooo teeters Sosaaren Copyright N° COPYRIGHT DEPOSIT. PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING 4 BOOK FOR THE FARMER By ; HOWARD R. SMITH ! Professor of Animal Husbandry, University of Nebraska Investigator in Animal Feeding, Nebraska Experiment Station PUBLISHED BY THE AUTHOR 1906 ° LINCOLN, NEBRASKA LIBRARY of CONGRESS} Two Copies Received |. DEC 26 1905 Copyright Entry » COPYRIGHT, 1905 © BY H. R. SMITH - anrnet RM@GAN PRINTING HOUSE CHICAGO, ILL. PREFACE. Profitable Stock Feeding, if the book deserves such a title, had its inception in a series of type- written lectures prepared for winter course students in the University of Nebraska School of Agricul- ture. With a constantly increasing enrollment in the stock feeding classes. (the number in 1905 pass- ing the two hundred mark) it seemed best to pub- lish in permanent form a rather full discussion of the subject, covering the ground in a way that would make it easily comprehended by even the least experienced, whether in the science or practice of feeding animals. The writer was further en- couraged to undertake such a task because of an enlarged correspondence with stock feeders, who, by proposing questions which presented themselves in their feeding operations, have manifested more than usual interest and confidence in what may be called the scientific side of stuck feeding. For several years previous to engaging in college and experiment station work, the writer was a prac- tical stock feeder, in the business for profit. It was an early realization of the financial advantages that would come from a knowledge of foods and the proc- esses of nutrition in animals that led to a more or less extended inquiry into the subject as a science. Later experiences in the field of investigation have made this the more evident. Each year, as the re- sults of experiments are compiled and the work of other stations reviewed, new proof is added to the fact that a careful system of feeding, in which na- ture’s laws are given recognition, is capable of pro- ducing, to a marked degree, larger and more prof- itable gains than indiscriminate feeding. It las been proved beyond a doubt that the cost of pro Vv vi PREFACE. ducing gains may be reduced from 20 to 30 per cent by properly compounding rations. Such evidence is forthcoming from all stations of the Middle West, where feeding questions have been given most consideration. Should a farmer lose by dis- ease one animal out of every five, he would feel much concerned. The equivalent of this is .hap- pening on many farms today through injudicious feeding. If stock feeding is to be conducted with profit, there must be put into the work a high order of intelligence. How can it be otherwise? The feeder is in constant touch with nature’s laws, which must not be ignored. He is dealing with a wide range of foods, differing essentially in physical character, in composition, and in digestibility. He is further- more dealing with an animal mechanism infinitely more complex in the arrangement of parts and the performance of functions. than anything ever wrought by man. If all foods and all classes of animals were alike, the problem would be a simple one. If all food consisted of the natural herbage, which at one time-grew uncultivated, animals would get for themselves more nearly what the system requires. But the artificial propagation of numer- ous forms of food (some kinds produced in greater abundance than others) has made the economical utilization of such foods a complex science. Nor can profitable stock feeding be looked upon as a science merely. It is a business, too, in the sense that one who is engaged in the work is each year confronted with a change in prices on foods, which compels him to keep posted on market quotations in order to be able to select those which go farthest for the money. In the following chapters market prices in their relation to profitable production are given the consideration they deserve, PREFACE. Vii While we are to be congratulated for the light that has been thrown upon feeding problems by ex- tensive work in the realm of research carried on during comparatively recent years, both at home and abroad, there is a great work yet to be done. The facts presented in this book are largely based upon scientific investigations carried on to the date of this writing, coupled with observations made by the writer during a period of practical experience in feeding while associated with his father, the late F. H. Smith, an extensive stock feeder for a period of forty vears, whose wise counsel has been of ines- timable value. An attempt has been made to begin at the bottom of the subject of stock feeding and proceed in some logical order. While the use of cer- tain technical terms is unavoidable, the aim has been to present the facts in a straightforward manner clothing them in the simplest language. It is hoped that the contents will be readable, and instructive to any and all who are interested in the feeding of live stock. It is out of the province of a book on feeding to include diseases of animals, but it seemed best to treat briefly of certain intestinal parasites found in sheep, inasmuch as this is a common disorder, but one easily guarded against. The thanks of the writer are due Mr. Joseph E. Wing, of Ohio, for the preparation of the chapter on parasites in sheep, and for reviewing other copy on sheep. The part devoted to sheep feeding was also reviewed by Hon. Peter Jansen, of Nebraska, well known for his success in feeding sheep on a large scale. In recognition of the immensity of the poultry industry in the United States, and its possibilities under careful management, a few chapters are de- voted to this important subject. Farm flocks of poultry are usually under the management of vill PREFACE. women, who, because of their more painstaking efforts in looking after the details connected with the rearing of young chickens, turkeys, etc., succeed best. Poultry raising is a pleasant and profitable occupation for the woman who has the time and in- clination for it. The chapters in this book were prepared by a sister of the writer, Miss M. L. Smith, who has been unusually successful in the manage- ment of poultry and as a farmers’ institute lecturer upon the subject. The leguminous hay crops—alfalfa, cowpeas and soy beans—are new to many farmers of the United States, and the growth of one or more of these or the better known clover plant is so essential on farms devoted to stock feeding, it has been thought best to publish in the appendix something concern- ing the culture of the three first mentioned. For the discussion of cowpea and soy bean growing the writer is indebted to Professor D. H. Otis, formerly of the Kansas Experiment Station, now connected with the Wisconsin Experiment Station. Alfalfa growing is described by Mr. E. G. Montgomery, who has given special attention to alfalfa in his work in the crop department of the Nebraska Ex- periment Station. Acknowledgment is also made to Professor T. L. Haecker, of the Minnesota Ex- periment Station, for reviewing the manuscript on dairy cattle; to my associate, Director E. A. Bur- nett, for reviewing that part concerning the feed- ing of breeding swine; to Mr. Fred Rankin, of IIli- nois, for reviewing other chapters on swine feed- ing; to Professor Rice, of the Cornell (New York) Experiment Station, for reviewing the copy on poul- try; and to Professor W. L. Carlyle, of the Colo- rado Experiment Station, for reviewing the chap- ters on horse feeding. H. R. SMITEe Lincoln, Nebr., December 15, 1905. CONTENTS. CHAPTER. PAGE. if Introduction—Live Stock in Its Relation to iiawMAPHiot se. Nees aie earn em amet 3 Part I—GENERAL PRINCIPLES IN STOCK FEEDING. 1 QUE Ve The Products from Feeding Animals......-- The Composition of Foods.......-++++++++> 12 Digestible Nutrients in OOO Shwe eiorelch=/=t-ter= 19 - Part II.—MILK PRODUCTION. The Dairy Cow....ccesssercesccsenseeress 37 Fundamentals in Feeding the Dairy Cow.... 48 Winter Rations in the Corn Belt.......-..-- 55 Feeding Without the Legumes for Roughage.. 80 Summer Pasture for Dairy Cows.....------- 97 Rearing Calves on Skim-milkiy.. 2.0 s-= +--+ = 5° 103 Parr III.—BEEr CATTLE. [EL cligaed 1 (TS pen OCA aig aC Ra ice Rex ie Oe ee 113 Shelter and Feed Lot Facilities for Beef (Obi AHI Roe cid Sa ab Oro Or anc Doc igi DOO iO 143 (BLA el clos Se oops eae i ee Ci AS A eae 150 Feeding Yearling Steers for 123 eee 156 Fattening Steers with Grain on Pasture. ..... 165 Winter Feeding Range Two-year-old Steers.. 172 Corn Substitutes, Protein Concentrates and the Preparation of Foods for Fattening ATT aa ee Mins Stalsivalelwislc sisiew elvis ojo ein: 5 186 Part IV.—SHEEP. Mutton Type. ....-.ceececceeeeseeeeereeres 190 The Farmer’s Breeding Flock..........---- 199 Fattening Lambs in the Fall.........--+--- 208 Fattening Lambs in Early Winter....-..--- 220 Fattening Range Lambs or Natives which have not had Grain on Pasture...-- tenis foto ix CHAPTER. XXITI. XXIV. XXV. XXXVI. XXVII. XXVIII. XXIX. XXX. XXXI. XXXII. XXXILI. XXXIV. XXXV. XXXVI. Appendix. . CONTENTS. PAGE arasites ane Sheeps <1) irer- arletelsierclersneteelerey 248 Part V.—SwINE. Py Pes HOLPEIOOSS cers. ohych iA. chien iter Cera: 253 The Breeding Herd of Swine............... 261 Hatienino spies ine ther Halll ss. yernreweeererenaete 273 LEU Keveun aye, TENCE TT MME ot aoc obo ode cee 280 Corn Substitutes for Swine...............:. 293 Protein Concentrates and the Preparation of HO OOS LOTS WANG aes cesietovarerstahey scl t = sie. sia\cps\s) = 69 Ears of Corn Showing Proper Stage of Ripeness for Silage. 71 Werttnvas COWS OM o PASTURE 3 atsysia isle susieiniensrs)le = sisusi <2 oe eee 221 Range: Y earliness sf: sere, clalorstere aicie iste al tetera eet 222 Range Scenes near Forbes, Wyoming.................... 233 Sheep Feeding in the Semi-Arid West...) 22..:........- "242 Lard Type—English Champion Berkshire Boar........... 254 Bacon Type—English Champion Tamworth Boar......... 254 Portable! Hose House. . «<<< ms amine nailer tate eee 263 Duroe-Jersey Brood ‘Sow: and (Pigs eyes saree mene Poland-Chinas: in) the . Feed-lot'ss cos cx-npye epee tieiee 279 Rack for Feeding Uncut Alfalfa Hay to Hogs............ 288 Rack Design for Feeding Alfalfa Hay to Hogs............ 289 Pens for Winter. Pig-feeding Tests. jae. on. eee 292 Laying Type—Single Comb Brown Leghorns............. 312 General-purpose Type—Single Comb Buff Orpingtons...... 313 Meat. lype—EPartridges Cochins:\-)\ 55 40 eee eee 314 Framework of Colony Brooder House.................... 317 Colony “Broader Houscaee se) 15 25 fo ee ee er 319 Curtain: -Wront Elouse ss Gyrecisetl-ye:-7-ic eres Sele cick ee ere eee 334 Curtain Front House—Interior View..................-- 330 Seratching Shed - Houses2/5 26 sees etn. oa ee eee 337 Poultry, PElouse. 2. «sem ae’ Poa esha Looe ee 339 Woubley qlouse ds. tsc. 3 cintye aemlereerka cre lash renee eae 341 Inexpensive. Poultry “House....5 «:. So wR A C fa Ea £32 38] 25 : Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Growing cattle ......... | 3to 6|| 24 | 3.5/12.8] 1.5||1: 4.7 Growime cattle <2... ... 6 to 12]| 25 | 2.5|/13.2] .7|/|1: 6 Growing cattle ......... 12to18|| 24 | 2 |42.5) .ojjt: 6.8 Fattening cattle (first pe-| io 8 SS ee eer 30 | 2.5]15 5/1: 6.5 Cattle (maintenance ra- THO) Bem Oo COM oe OOe one 18 aif if}{i|1 bea alate: Elorsem (heavy WOrk)i. (cls... -- > 26 | 2.5/13.3 8|j1: 6 Growing swine ......... 2to 3!) 44 | 7.6/28 1\|1: 4 Growing swine ......... 3to 5]| 35 | 5 {23.1 8/1: 5 Fattening swine (first pe-| RAMs oe tei 12 951 21.86 23.58 21.15 12.1 At the Connecticut Experiment Station it was found that the average of several cows of dairy type produced milk at a cost of $0.69 per hundred, where- as cows beefy in type produced milk at a cost of $1.00 per hundred. The South Dakota Station, in a recent test, found that the beef cows required one- third more grain for each pound of milk than did the dairy cows. This difference is not necessarily be- tween beef and dairy breeds, as individuals within one of the special purpose dairy breeds very com- monly show a contrast as striking. It is purely a question of individual capacity, which is usually associated with a certain conformation of body, called dairy type. Such types are most commonly 40 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. found in so-called dairy breeds, of which the Jersey, Holstein-Friesian and Guernsey are the most com- mon in America. The body of the dairy cow should be deep and roomy, especially in the abdominal region where diges- tion, assimilation, and milk secretion largely take place. Unlike the beef cow, which is more box like in form, the dairy cow approaches more nearly the wedge shape, in that she is comparatively narrow in front, widening out and deepening toward the rear. The dairy cow consumes a large proportion of roughage and therefore needs a large paunch, or barrel. Whereas it is desirable to have the beef animal closely knit and compact in type for early maturity and quick fleshing qualities, the dairy cow should be more loosely constructed. Her head and neck should correlate with her body, all being rather long in proportion to her size. Both the ribs and vertebrae of the back should be wide spaced. The hip bones should be sharp and prominent, the rump narrow and sloping, giving an angular appearance in the region of the pelvic bones. The twist, or space between the hind legs, should be open to give room for a large and evenly quartered udder. The milk vein extending from the udder forward to the middle of the abdomen should also be large. The score-card enumerates other points in judging the dairy cow, many of which are of minor significance to the practical dairyman. The dairy cow should never become heavy in flesh even with a most liberal feeding. To be a most perfect machine she must con- vert practically all of her food, above maintenance, into milk, putting on just enough flesh to give her needed protection. The bony, angular appearance of the cow large in paunch is not always pleasing to the eye, but it means profit to the owner. ——— THE DAIRY COW. AI Good dairy type—High. grade Jersey, weight 725 Ibs.: average yearly record, 1897-1902, butter 369 Ibs., milk 7,378 Ibs. Inferior daily type—High grade Jersey, weight 750 lbs.; record one. year, 1899, butter 62 Ibs., milk 1,279 Ibs. 42 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. The Score-Card for Dairy Cows, as arranged by Prof. T. L. Haecker, is a deduction from observa- tions made on the University of Minnesota herd, covering twelve years’ work, during which time complete records were kept of food consumed and products yielded by each cow, these being com- pared with her conformation. Seale of points for dairy cows, as arranged by Haecker of the Minnesota Experiment Station: Temperament—30. Counts. lst eye, stalls expressives nec eee eens 5 2. Face, clean, rather long, nostrils open, large...... = on Neck light--ratherslonp. “ewe mecked ee eres 3 A. = Withers: to 35 per cent digestible protein; those in Class II, from 17 to 20 per cent, and those in Class III, from 12 to 13 per cent.. The relation of the-three classes am terms of protein may be given as 30, 18, 12. Accord- ingly, there would be required a percentage of the wheat by-product in the ration one and a half times the percentage of foods in Class II and two and a half times the percentage of those constituting Class I. In other words, if oil meal, for example, is used as 10 per cent of the ration, one of those in Class IT should constitute 17 per cent, and bran or shorts 25 per cent. The proportion 30, 18, 12 should also be a fairly good estimate of relative values. Were any further distinction to be made, it would be to give cottonseed meal a valuation more nearly to correspond with its higher protein content, about 36, though it will average in quality lower than that figure represents. Rations Without the Legume Hay Plants.—With only cornstalks for roughage, a ration to be well balanced should be something as follows: Dry Carbo- Nutritive matter. Protein. hydrates. Fat. ratio. Carn, '9) 1is.c4e ena te 8.02 Fl 2 51600) a0 229 Cottonseed meal 3 lbs. 2.75 1.12 50 .36 Corn stover, 23 Ibs. .. 13.68 39 7.45 16 Potal::22 chivcsctpisle 24.45 2.22 13.95 91 Levee If the corn is cut just as soon as the ears are FEEDING WITHOUT LEGUMES 87 ripe and the stalks are well cured in the shock, such a ration will give good results at a low cost. Sorghum (sugar-cane) is often grown for fod- der, particularly in regions where rains are less abundant and corn is less likely to succeed. Sor- ghum yields well, and if the seed is drilled rather thickly the stems grow small, making the forage better relished and more easily masticated. Sor- ghum hay is so similar to corn stover in composi- tion, the difference being due to the presence of more sugar and less starch in sorghum, that the ‘two should be supplemented in the same way. Timothy hay is nearly as deficient in protein as are the two fodders just described. Timothy is in such demand for horse feeding that its market price is much above its real worth for all other classes of stock. Should it be the only roughage at the feed- er’s disposal, it could be fed with cottonseed meal as follows: Dry Carbo- Nutritive matter. Protein. hydrates. Fat. ratio. Corn) eS DS ieee staan so 7.13 -63 5.33 34 Cottonseed meal, 3 Ibs... 2.75 1.12 50 36 Mimothy, Svs: <2... 15.61 50 7.81 25 Ope a eke ore CAD 2.25 13.64 95 Wey Prairie hay, which grows so abundantly on the Western plains, is similar to timothy in composi- tion, though it usually consists of so many varieties of grasses that its analysis in one section is inap- plicable to another. The Minnesota Station found timothy and prairie hay practically equal for pro- ducing milk. This should be fed as has been sug- gested for timothy. Millet hay (Hungarian grass) is not in high favor as a forage plant, though it yields well and pro- duces a crop quickly. Mullet often causes scours, especially when cut too green, which makes it some- 88 FROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING, what objectionable. On the other hand, if allowed to ripen, the fodder is less valuable and the small, hard seeds are irritating to the digestive tract. It should be supplemented in the same manner as timothy hay, though much better results are se- cured by using millet as half the roughage. Oat straw is an inexpensive material on most farms, where it is often used for bedding purposes. By referring to the table it will be seen that oat straw has less protein than the foods described, on account of which about one-third more protein food should be used. Any straw contains a large quan- tity of crude fiber, mostly indigestible, which ex- plains why less of such roughness will be consumed, making a larger use of grain necessary. Oat straw is another food more successfully utilized in con- nection with some other roughage. Wheat and rye straw contain still less protein and more crude fiber than is found in oat straw. In fact, they contain so much inert matter, and so much energy is expended in extracting the little nutri- ment contained, that the economy of forcing such material upon any class of animals, at least in quan- tity, is questionable. With no other forms of rough- age, they will serve as “fillers,” as all ruminants re- quire some bulk. Straw is an excellent absorbent and extremely useful for bedding, for which pur- pose it often yields more revenue than for use as a food. Variety in the roughage fed is as much appre- ciated as variety in the grain ration. When possi- ble two or more kinds should be supplied. If hay from any one of the legumes, alfalfa, clover, cow- peas or soy beans, is fed as half the roughage, it would be more profitable to reduce the amount of cottonseed meal or other commercial protein foods ee eee Se FEEDING WITHOUT LEGUMES 85 to one-half of that recommended for stover, timothy or the other fodder plants of that class. Roughage Need Not Be Weighed.—The rations, as outlined in the preceding pages, show something of how the foods should be put together to furnish the nutrients, together with.the bulk desirable, for a dairy cow weighing 1,000 pounds. If a cow is lighter or heavier, the ration should be varied ac- cordingly. It is not the thought of the writer that the roughage be weighed, as this would involve too much labor. By weighing a measure full of grain it is possible to regulate the amount at each feed with but little inconvenience. The average cow, if fed the weight of grain recommended, will consume approximately the amount of hay or other roughage stated, providing she has before her all her appetite craves—such an allowance as will be cleaned up each day with no waste except coarse stems, which have little nutritive value and are only serviceable for bedding. Beet Pulp.—tThe sugar beet industry has attained such proportions in certain sections of the United States that the pulp, a residual product from the manufacture of sugar from the beet, has come under consideration relative to a possible feeding value it may possess. Pulp has no commercial value aside from its use as a stock food, which makes it all the more necessary to give it a careful trial for feeding purposes. In the process of sugar manu- facture the beets are crushed, saturated with water and chemically treated. The pulp is simply the crushed beet minus the sugar it originally contained, plus water. One hundred pounds of pulp has ap- proximately ten pounds of dry matter. It is, there- fore, extremely watery and quickly fermentable, which makes it a product most suitable for feeding in close proximity to the sugar factories, rather than gO PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. to pay heavy freight charges for its transportation ; and, furthermore, it should be fed_out quickly rather than stored for any length of time, unless the silo is used. While beet pulp contains but little dry mat- ter, making it low in nutritive value, when fed with grain and dry fodder, it has, like corn silage and roots, a physiological effect upon the system which is beneficial. This makes it somewhat more_ valuable than its composition would indicate— especially for milch cows. The Cornell (New York) Station found that the dry matter of beet pulp is equivalent to the dry matter of corn silage, which makes two tons of- average pulp equal to one ton of corn silage, ap- proximately, for feeding purposes. At the Colorado Station it was also found that two tons of pulp are the equivalent of one ton of the beets. These two tests confirm the Nebraska test, which showed sugar beets to be practically equivalent to corn silage, pound for pound, for dairy cows. The Colorado Station advocates fifty pounds as a maximum daily feed of pulp. In their tests, twenty-four pounds were fed per day in connection with twenty pounds of alfalfa, four pounds of corn chop and four pounds of wheat chop. Beets were fed in the same way in half the quantity. In the New York test each cow ate from fifty to one hun- dred pounds of pulp per day, according to size, in addition to eight pounds of grain and six to twelve pounds of hay. Dried molasses beet pulp is a new product given considerable prominence by sugar companies. The Vermont Station found it equivalent to the dry mat- ter of corn silage and as efficient as bran, though the two are hardly comparable because the dried pulp is not a protein food. Its preparation is de- scribed as follows: FEEDING WITHOUT LEGUMES : QI “The beets are thoroughly washed, then shredded and placed in large cylinders. Pure ‘water is ad- mitted and the sugar soaked out by the diffusion process. This liquor is drawn off and the pulp, containing 92 per cent moisture and one-quarter per cent sugar, is conveyed at once to the drier, where it is first run through presses reducing the moisture to 82 per cent. Residuum molasses from the sugar factory containing 50 per cent sugar is next mixed with the pressed pulp. This mixture is then put into the kilns, where it is thoroughly dried by direct heat. The drying process lasts 35 min- utes. Immediately upon coming from the kilns the pulp is sacked and is ready for shipment. The dry- ing follows the use of the water so quickly that there is no opportunity for fermentation. One hour from the time the sugar is extracted from the beets the dried molasses beet pulp is in sacks ready for use. “Dried beet pulp, whether molasses is added to it or not, is hardly in the same class as other concen- trates. Its origin and method of manufacture are so unlike them that we may expect to find its chemical composition and adaptations unusual. Such is found to be the case. -Its protein content is lower than that of any ordinary concentrate ex- cept corn-meal; its nitrogen-free extract and ether extract contents are low and their composition rela- tively poor and lacking in true starch and fat; and its crude fiber percentage is high. It cannot serve to narrow a ration, since its nutritive ratio is wide. Theoretically it would seem better adapted to fat- tening than to milk making; but as a matter of fact it was found satisfactory in these trials.” Beet leaves are produced in abundance on land devoted to the culture of sugar beets. In actual value leaves are better than straw, but less valuable g2 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING, than hay. The presence of oxalic acid makes it ad- visable to feed beet leaves moderately. Roots are very commonly used in European coun- tries for all classes of stock. In the United States their growth is more largely confined to small farms in Eastern States, where land is comparatively high in price. A large tonnage of roots can be grown on a limited area, though in actual pounds of dry mat- ter produced they are not ahead of some of our forage crops. It is their watery, succulent character which makes roots especially adapted for milk pro- duction. In the corn belt, however, silage can be produced at half the cost, and, as shown by experi- ments, the silage is equal to roots, pound for pound, making root growing less practical. Of the dif- ferent kinds of roots, mangel wurzels are most in favor, because they yield heavily and are at the same time well relished. Cabbages are also grown for cows, and they are relished extremely well, even more so than roots. By proper methods of culture they can also be made to yield well, often requiring less labor than is re- quired for root growing. Without the silo for corn, at least some roots or cabbages should be grown for the dairy herd. Corn Substitutes——On many farms cereals other than corn are often grown for feeding purposes, either because they fit well in the crop rotation, or because the farmer feels it something of a risk to depend entirely upon corn for fattening purposes. ~ In thé Northern States especially, the dangers from killing frosts in the fall would seem to warrant the growth of at least a small acreage of barley or some other corn substitute. In the semiarid regions cer- tain other crops yield better and are more to be relied upon than corn. In feeding any of these so- called substitutes, either alone or mixed, protein FEEDING WITHOUT LEGUMES 93 foods should be used to supplement them, as has been recommended for corn, with exceptions as stated below. Barley is an excellent substitute for corn where the latter cannot be successfully grown because of unfavorable climatic conditions. Barley contains a little more protein than does corn, but, on the other hand, it has more crude fiber and is somewhat less palatable. In tests that have been made the two were found to be practically equal in value, and one may be used as a substitute for the other. It is more necessary to grind barley, because of its smaller size and hardness. Emmer (speltz) is similar to barley in composi- tion, though it contains more fiber. At the South Dakota Station barley proved to be 13 per cent more valuable than speltz for milk production. Farmers in the semiarid sections can grow speltz more successfully than barley, much more so than corn, and where they have fed it to dairy cows good results have been secured. Owing to its bulk, it would seem better adapted for cows than any other class of animals. Wheat is occasionally so low in price as to make its use for stock feeding practicable. It should be ground and mixed with bran or some other food to make it less sticky, under which circumstances it is equal to corn. Wheat is somewhat richer in protein than corn, requiring, therefore, a little less of this nutrient from other sources. Rye should also be ground and fed as suggested for wheat, though it seems to be from 5 to Io per cent less valuable, which must be due to its unpalat- ability, as the two grains are similar in composi- tion. Kafir corn and sorghum seed are semiarid products, and both are very commonly fed to stock, 94 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. The seeds are so small and hard that grinding is also necessary with them, more necessary, in fact, than with wheat or barley. Neither Kafir corn nor cane seed is so well relished as corn by dairy cows, which, no doubt, partly accounts fee a slightly lower feeding value. Oats are well relished and contain more protein than the other foods described. They are excellent regulators, because of their bulk and the fact that they are easily digested. Whenever the market price of oats is no higher than corn per hundred weight, they should be fed. Even at a slightly higher price, they can be used economically in a limited way to furnish variety, and with corn-meal they add bulk, which is advantageous. Condimental Stock Foods.—During recent years numerous establishments for the manufacture of so- called stock foods have sprung up in various parts of the country. The enterprise and aggres- siveness displayed by these concerns in advertis- ing their goods have been such as to arouse con- siderable interest among farmers as to the validity of the claims made for such products. The claims made are: first, that they are appetizers, promot- ing digestion; and, secondly, that they have medici- — nal properties beneficial in effect. Several expert- ment stations have been investigating these claims, among them Massachusetts, which reports as fol- lows concerning the ingredients used: “The sub- stances generally employed as a basis for the stock foods were the cereals—corn and wheat offal es- pecially—linseed meal, beans and rice. The poul- try foods were composed of similar substances, to- gether with oyster shells and meat and bone meal. Among the remaining ingredients, added ostensibly for medicinal effect, are numbered many of the old- time remedies, such as common salt, charcoal, black FEEDING WITHOUT LEGUMES 95 pepper, cayenne, fenugreek, sulfur, Glauber and Ep- som salts, and occasionally fennel, ginger, tumeric and sulfate of iron. Fenugreek was a favorite in the stock mixtures and pepper in the poultry foods. Venetian red (oxide of iron) was often used simply to color and disguise the character of the other constituents. Finely ground charcoal acted in a similar manner. In several instances noticeable quantities of sand were found, but whether to in- crease the weight or as an accidental admixture is difficult to say.” Dr. James B. Paige in Bulletin 71 of the Massa- chusetts Station says: “Contrary to the popular belief, animals in a state of health, under favorable conditions as regards food and stabling, do not need condition powders or tonic foods. There is in the body of such an animal a condition of equi- librium of all body functions. The processes of nutrition, digestion and assimilation are at their best. All that is required to maintain this condi- tion of balance is that the animal be kept under sanitary conditions and receive a sufficient quantity of healthful, nutritious food and pure water. It may be possible by the use of such substances to improve the appetite so that an animal will ingest and possibly digest more food, but should the in- creased quantity of nutrient constituents elaborated ‘not be appropriated by the tissues of the body, harm may result from the overloading of the lymphatic system or from an increased activity of the ex- cretory organs. In the case of sick animals there are abnormal conditions to be taken into considera- tion, such as loss of appetite, weakened digestion, poor circulation and malnutrition. Until every or- gan performs its normal function a state of health does not, cannot exist. If by the administration of a tonic, stimulant or an alterative it is possible to restore to a normal condition any organ so that , G65 > PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. it can perform its function, then every organ in the body is benefited.” Station Tests with Stock Foods.—Hills of the Vermont Station fed Nutriotone to cows and re- ports as follows: “The material does not appear to have increased productiveness in this particular ex- periment.” Bartlett of Maine says, “In neither of these cases did Nutriotone have any effect, either favorable or otherwise.” Sir John Bennett Lawes, the late well-known English investigator, after ex- amining the merits of condimental stock foods, said: “In conclusion I feel bound to say that I should require much clearer evidence than any that has © hitherto been adduced to satisfy me that the bal- ance-sheet of my farm would present a more satis- factory result at the end of the year were I to give each horse, ox, sheep and pig a daily allowance of one of these costly foods.” After feeding condimental stock foods to dairy cows at the Kansas Station, the experimenter con- cludes that they “are worthless for dairy cows ac- customed to a good balanced ration.” The New Jersey Experiment Station in making a summary of all feeding experiments with condi- mental foods says, “In thirteen of sixteen experi- ments the addition of condimental foods either had no effect at all or was actually a detriment to the ration, while in three experiments they had a slight- ly favorable effect, but in each case the yield was accompanied by a greatly increased cost of the product.” These are facts concerning stock foods as they are found by careful and impartial investigation. It is difficult to understand how such foods can be sold at from $100 to $200 per ton, with oil meal, cottonseed meal and gluten meal bringing not more than $30 per ton, CHAPTER IX. SUMMER) PASTURE FOR DAIRY COWS. Early Spring Pasture—After cows have been confined to dry feed all winter, the first green blades in the spring are eagerly sought and are eaten with great relish. Fresh pasture invariably increases the flow of milk, especially when the cows have not been receiving silage. Rye sown early the previous fall will make a good growth and will provide an abundance of green pasture three or four weeks before grass is ready. It can be sown in the corn at the time of the last cultivation, and if the field is to be again planted to corn it will furnish an abundance of pasture up to the time for plowing the ground. Rye sown in the cornfield will also make the ground wash less dur- ing fall and spring, and when turned under it adds humus to the soil. Rye is not so well relished as grass, though early in the spring before grass ap- pears it seems to be appreciated. Winter wheat is sometimes pastured in early spring and afterwards-allowed to ripen. If there is a good growth a little pasturing probably does it no harm. It is similar to rye in its effect upon the milk flow, and is, if anything, a little more pala- table. Blue grass pasture has no superior for milk pro- duction, partly because of its composition and part- ly because it is more relished than other grasses. No matter how well cows are fed in winter they increase their flow when turned on an abundance of fresh blue grass in the spring. The one objection 97 98 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. to blue grass.is that it stops growth during the hot, dry weather of late summer, which often makes it necessary to cut green crops to supplement it. Brome grass, which is comparatively new in the United States, stands dry weather weli because of its longer roots. It is for this reason very popular in the drier parts of the country. It starts early in the spring and yields well for a plant adapted only for pasturing. Other grasses, including meadow fescue, orchard grass, etc., are used for cow pasture and should be sown if they seem to be best adapted to a given locality. The legumes, clover and alfalfa, are also used for pasture plants, though the latter is almost certain to cause the death of some of the cows from bloat unless sown mixed with other grasses. Of the clo- vers, the small white clover seems to be most rel- ished as a pasture plant. Mixed grass pastures are in favor because they furnish variety and usually produce more food per acre. If one grass fails on account of dry weather, another hardier variety grows more luxuriantly in its stead. Feeding Grain on Pasture.—The Cornell Experi- ment Station (New York) for a series of years fed grain on grass pasture, from which test it was con- cluded that while grain often increases the milk flow, the extra flow does not compensate for the grain fed, and is, therefore, not a profitable prac- tice when grass is abundant. This conclusion has also been reached in other states. If for any rea- son pasture is scarce, then grain or soiling crops should be supplied. Soiling, by which is meant cutting green crops and feeding while still fresh, is very -commonly practiced in Europe and Eastern United States. ~ Soiling usually begins in July, when pastures are SUMMER PASTURE FOR DAIRY COWS. 99 likely to become dry and scanty. By its practice dairymen are often able to keep many more cows on a given acreage of land, one acre in soiling crops producing as much as two or three acres of pasture. The labor connected with soiling is the one thing which will not make this practice popular in the West, where at that season of the year farmers already have difficulty in securing sufficient help. Soiling is more to be recommended for dairy specialists, on account of which it is not the pur- pose of the writer to enter into the details of the system for the benefit of the general farmer. Brief- ly, it consists of growing certain crops which fur- nish an abundance of green feed at successive periods during the season. Such crops as rye, clover, alfalfa, oats and peas mixed, early and late corn, sorghum, etce., are planted at a time to insure a continuous supply of green though fairly mature feed, which is supposed to last until late fall. Wuth the advent of the silo many prefer to put up enough ‘silage to last during the summer, claiming it is less expensive than regular soiling crops. Flies become very troublesome in late summer, not only reducing the milk flow but also causing no little annoyance to the milker. The Kansas Station recommends the following as a fly dope for milch cows: Two cakes of laundry soap are dissolved in warm water, into which solution there is mixed 1% pounds of resin, % pint of fish oil. and sufficient water to make 3 gallons. This may be applied with a brush, or as a spray by adding ™% pint of kerosene oil. About % pint is put on each cow two or three times a week until the hair becomes coated with resin. Were one to figure the cost of material, and labor of putting on the dope, there is little doubt but that some sort of a blanket would be more economical 100 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. in the end. Blankets may be made from gunny sack- ing; or those with elastic bands, protecting the under side of the body as well as the upper, may be purchased from dealers at from $1 to $1.25 each. Shelter in Summer.—Many overcome the fly and heat difficulty by housing the cows in a dark but cool stable during the day, pasturing in the field at night. Green crops freshly cut are fed in the barn. A basement barn is preferable, though any barn with a tight floor above the cows, giving an air space between this floor and the roof, does very well. If the cows are kept in the field during the day, it is essentially important that they have shade tnees: Fresh water should be found in every pasture or conveniently near. The work of milk elaboration, whether in winter or summer, requires a large sup- ply of water. Salt should be fed regularly or kept before the cows at all times. Common salt or pulverized rock is preferable to rock salt. A box kept under roof is” perhaps best for furnishing a continuous supply. Dry Cows.—lf the cows are fresh in the fall, late summer feeding should give no special concern, as every cow should be dry at that season for at least six or eight weeks. For the cow not giving milk, green feed is less needed, which is one argument in favor of having cows fresh in the fall. The dry cow in winter will do well without grain, if she has roughage of the right character. The calf in utero needs for its best development a large proportion of protein material, while the cow needs for her own maintenance a surplus of heat and energy-making material, such as carbohydrates and: fats. Any of the legumes, whether alfalfa, clover or cowpea hay, will supply protein. In fact, any of these alone will furnish more protein than ar , SUMMER PASTURE FOR DAIRY COWS. Io! is actually needed by the cow and her calf. For the sake of variety, too, there should be fed with one of these protein fodders something more starchy, and at the same time less expensive, as corn sto- ver, prairie hay, sorghum, or even oat straw if any of the others are not available. Any one or more of the last named fodders should not consti- tute more than one-third to one-half the entire ration by weight, the remainder consisting of the protein roughage. Should the roughage be inferior in quality, it would be necessary to supply a little grain in addition. Feeding the Fresh Cow.—Immediately after the birth of the calf the cow will be weak and fever- ish. In that condition she will require considerable water—which should be slightiy warmed—but will show little inclination for food. Whatever is given her should be of a light character, such as well- cured clover or alfalfa and a little bran, preferably made into a mash by the use of warm water. A few pounds of bran will have a cooling and laxative effect, which is always beneficial just after calving. The following day, four or five pounds of a mixture of equal parts of corn, oats and bran would prove satisfactory, Without oats it would be well to feed equal parts by weight of corn and bran, gradually increasing the corn to three-fourths of the grain ration, at the same time making the daily feed gradually larger until at the end of three weeks she is receiving a full ration of ten or twelve pounds of grain per day, the exact amount depending upon the size of the cow. In the meantime the cow should be given all the clover or alfalfa hay she will consume. The Abusive Treatment of the Milch Cow a Positive Source of Loss.—Every animal is capable of doing its best when the conditions are most fa- LOZ) > PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. vorable for quietness and contentment. All harsh treatment results in a waste of nervous energy at the expense of food. In the case of the milch cow gentleness in handling is still more important, inas- much as milk secretion isa part of “maternity” in animals, and anything in the way’of unkindness - tends to suppress this instinct, lessening the flow of milk accordingly. If the cow is well treated she will feel kindly toward her attendant, and at least one condition will be favorable for maximum pro- duction. If a cow acts “mean” there is always some cause for it—either she inherits a nervous disposi- tion and for that reason must be dealt with pa- tiently, or she has been made “suspicious” by hav- ing had, at some time in her life, unkind treatment. Dairy Cows in Pasture. CHAPTER X. REARING CALVES ON SKIM MILK. Whole Milk Costly.—In farming sections where dairy cows are kept for butter making, it is custom- ary to raise calves on skim milk. This may be milk from which the cream has risen and has been skimmed in the usual way, or it may be milk from which the cream has been extracted by the use of the separator. While the butter fat may be re- moved more perfectly by the use of the separator, leaving the milk obtained by this process less rich than the gravity milk, there is after all so little dif- ference in the food value of the. two kinds that whatever is said concerning the feeding of one will apply also to the other, In view of the fact that whole milk is the natural and most perfect food for young animals and that fresh skim milk only differs from whole milk in that it contains but little or no fat, it would seem that, were it possible to substitute some less ex- pensive but equally digestible fat for butter fat, just as good results could be secured from feeding skim milk. Theoretically this is correct. In practice it is extremely difficult to make the conditions suf- ficiently favorable to secure the same thrift in the skim milk calf as. is ordinarily found in the well nourished sucking calf. The latter not only has the milk in its original composition, uncontaminated by bacteria and perfectly warmed, but he is also com- pelled by force of circumstances to take milk into the stomach slowly, making it more easily acted upon by the digestive fluids and less apt to cause 103 104 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING, scours. But even though the whole-milk calf is somewhat better raised, butter fat is so valuable as a commercial article, that feeding whole milk or permitting calves to suck their dams is an extrava- gant practice on good farming lands. _ Skim milk, therefore, is to be chiefly relied upon for growing all calves on the farm except pure-breds of the beef breeds. How to obtain best results from feeding skim milk is worthy of careful consideration. Early Feeding.—The young calf should be given a good start by having fresh whole milk at least the first week. It is better for the cow if the calf is fed from the pail the second or third day after birth, and the calf may be taught to drink with less trouble at this age than later. From four to six quarts a day, depending upon the size of the calf, is enough during the first week. If this: amount could be given in three feeds it would be better for the calf. During the second week the feeding may be done twice a day, and a little skim milk— perhaps a half pint—substituted for whole milk, the amount to be increased very gradually until at the end of three weeks the whole milk is entirely with- drawn, when the calf should be receiving from five to seven quarts of skim milk per day. At the close of the second month eight or nine quarts may ordi- narily be fed a good-sized calf without inducing scours, which sometimes result from overfeeding on milk. At four months of age ten quarts may be given, and at five months eleven quarts. Scours.—Should a calf become affected with scours, a raw egg mixed in the milk will usually bring relief, or, if a severe case, a tablespoonful of _ castor oil, followed by a raw egg every two hours until four to six eggs are taken. A teaspoonful of soluble blood meal, another form of albumen—sold by the packing houses for about 3 cents a pound— ‘ yet ee nem wrt." ane REARING CALVES ON SKIM MILK. 105 stirred in the milk will act in a way similar to the egg and is much less expensive. The Kansas Sta- tion reports excellent results with dried blood (blood meal), claiming that a mild case of scours can be cured in one or two days by adding a tea- spoonful to the milk, which last should be tempo- rarily reduced in quantity. The Idaho Station rec- ommends for scours an ounce of lime water added to the milk. Skim milk should be warmed to a temperature of go to 100 degrees Fahrenheit before feeding. Cold milk chills the calf and often brings on digestive disorders. On the other hand, if milk is heated to the scalding point the albumen coagulates and rises to the top in the form of a scum, which coagulation tenders it less digestible. Every one, who raises calves on skim milk should be provided with a smail glass thermometer that may be hung with the bulb submerged in the milk, by which means the warming may be discontinued at the proper time. The feeding buckets should be made of tin or galvanized iron, having just as few seams as possi- ble. Milk is likely to collect in these seams, where it becomes charged with bacteria, these micro-or- ganisms affecting the milk in such a way as to set up fermentation and consequent indigestion in the calf. Infection from bacteria can only be avoided by thoroughly washing and scalding the buckets after each feed. Probably more than half the dis- orders prevalent among skim milk calves have their source in unscalded buckets. The calf is very susceptible to disorders from contamination. At creameries skim milk is often sterilized by introduc- ing steam from the boilers, which makes it more wholesome, Fat Substitutes.—Several concentrated foodstuffs 106 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. rich in fat have been tested as butter fat substitutes. Flaxseed meal is richest in fat and can be used very successfully. Soon after a part of the whole milk is withdrawn and skim milk is fed in its stead, a tablespoonful of flaxseed meal may be stirred in the milk each day just before feeding. Making a jelly by pouring hot water on flaxseed meal is an excellent way of feeding this meal. A_ table- spooniul ot’ jelly may be added to ‘each, teed: the amount gradually increased until as high as a half pound per day is fed to the six-weeks-old calf. Old process linseed meal is often used in the same way, though it is less rich in fat. Corn germ meal, a by-product from the manufacture of glucose and corn starch, is also made to serve as a substi- tute for butter fat. Corn oil, another by-product made by glucose factories, has recently been tested by the Nebraska Experiment Station, but with re- sults less satisfactory because of the cathartic effect of the oil. It is, furthermore, difficult to mix corn oil with skim milk. Flaxseed and linseed meal are well adapted for early feeding, because they con- tain little or no starch, and the very young calf is lacking the necessary equipment for digesting starch. Whole milk contains sugar, but no starch. Mixing flaxseed jelly with the milk need not be con- tinued after the first few weeks, as dry grain should be fed separately just as soon as'the calf can — be induced to eat it. By putting grain in the bottom of the bucket after the milk has been con- sumed it can be fed early, and this practice has the further advantage of diverting the attention of the calf, causing him to eat grain rather than to suck the ears of his mates, which seems to be a natural tendency with calves after drinking milk. Stanchions overcome the sucking habit most effectually, and they have the further advantage of REARING CALVES ON SKIM MILK. 107 being wonderfully convenient when several calves are kept together, as by their use all the calves may be quickly and securely held as long as seems neces- sary. The stanchion is a simple contrivance made of narrow boards fixed vertically and sufficiently far apart to permit the calf to enter his head at feeding time, the attendant thereupon fastening the boards closely enough together to make it imposs:- ble for the head to be drawn out. On the floor or ground in front is a feed box just wide enough to hold a pail firmly and long enough to accommodate the desired number of calves. The lumber required for ten stanchions, as given by the Kansas Experi- ment Station, is as follows: 1 piece 1”x12”x12’, for bottom of feed-box. 2 pieces 1”x12”x16’, for bottom of feed-box (8 ft.), upright partitions (24). 2 pieces 1”x6”x10’, for front of feed-box. 5 pieces 1”’x6”x16’, cypress or full-thickness pine, for top and bottom rails. 5 pieces 1”x4”x12’, full thickness, for fixed uprights. 2 pieces 1”x4”x16’, 4” thick, for swinging uprights. 10 pieces 3”x6”x1”, for tongues or locks. 3 posts 6 feet in length. 3 blocks 6”x12” under feed-box. “The stanchions are two feet wide between the partitions and three and one-half feet high. he board along the front of the feed boxes is hinged, so it may be turned down and the boxes thoroughly cleaned out. At the end of the stanchion is a rack for hay. With these stanchions a feeder can keep four pails going and can feed a bunch of calves in a very short time.” (See illustration, page 112.) Grain Feeding.—Not only can milk be fed more conveniently by use of the stanchions, but the calves can be induced to eat dry grain earlier by having them thus fastened. After drinking milk they seem to crave something to put in the mouth, and if other calves’ ears are not within reach they 108 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. very often nibble at grain placed before them even when they are but ten days or two weeks old. For young calves nothing superior to oats seems to have been discovered. At an early age, too, calves show an inclination for something bulky, which craving should be satisfied, as it is but a manifestation of a physiological law. Oats, which are easily digested, furnish bulk, and, in addition to these advantages, contain a rather high percentage of fat. No farm food in common use excels oats in their tendency to counteract scours in calves. Whole oats seem bet- ter than the ground grain. As the calf becomes a little older a small portion of shelled corn may be added, increasing the amount to equal parts of oats and corn as weaning time approaches. Here again the whole grain is prefer- able. It has a fresher flavor, inasmuch as meal sometimes taints from exposure, the oil being most susceptible to decomposition. Calves, furthermore, seem fond of cracking the whole grains. The Kan- sas Station in a recent test found the whole grain considerably more profitable than the meal. Bran, rich in both mineral matter and protein for bone development, is sometimes added, though it is often- _ times rather too laxative for calves receiving skim milk; the milk, too, furnishes all the protein needed. By a judicious use of farm grains, commercial foods, while often profitable, are not essential. Quantity of Grain Most Profitable for Skim Milk Calves.—The following, again furnished by the Kansas Station, are timely data upon this subject: REARING CALVES ON SKIM MILK. TABLE. FULL GRAIN RATION VS. THREE-QUARTERS OF A FULL GRAIN RATION WITH SKIM MILK FOR CALVES. KANSAS EXPERIMENT STATION. a Grain fed. a Roughness fed. | 5 pene: Sire ery me 5 a b aI a ce = 8 S = 5 a b> | oO = x Total mb ra x Total DB] es 5 Ss ro : © & ms a 2) 5 2 aa | grain. a aa a z © hay. peace Choe ol oes gee | a ol al ne Zl a aa o Ay < fo) > aap = Full-grain i Lbs. Lbs. | Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. | Lbs. | Lbs. | Lbs. | Lbs. Lbs. ration lot....../10/1 40] 16,496] 1,149.0|1,167.0| 2,316.0|| 1,816] 4,184] 780.0] 862| .....'] 7,644.0 Three-quarters ' grain ration lot.|10/1 40] 16,199| 861.8! 861.8] 1,723.6] 2,176| 6,753| 745.2] 416| 161.5 | 10,251.7 Average gains. Feed consumed per 100 pounds gain. Per Daily a . Rough- head. | per head. Mulls. Oran. ness. el-grain ration’ lots five... geese: ae 188.5 1.34 875.11 122.86 405.51 Three-quarters grain ration lot......:.. 160.9 1.14 MACE jp MO 637.14 im ie) PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING, If the skim milk is figured at 15 cents per hun- dred, as is customary, the roughness $5 per ton, and the grain 70 cents per hundred, each pound of gain on the heavy or full grain ration costs 3.17 cents, while on three-quarters of a full grain feed the cost would be 4.85 cents, a favorable showing for a full feed of grain in connection with skim milk. The table is of interest in that it shows how much of the different feeds was consumed during the 140 days. Kafir corn was fed ground, because the seeds are small and hard. In another test 30 per cent was saved by grinding Kafir corn. Roughage of the best quality the farm affords should be placed within reach of calves when two or three weeks old. Prairie hay is more constipat- ing than alfalfa, though the latter is much more relished, and, if an early cutting, is not likely to be excessively loosening. Clover is first-class—very much better than amothy, which is rather too harsh and coarse for young calves. Pasture for skim milk calves should not be too watery, because of its laxativeness. Turning spring calves out early is, therefore, not to be recom- mended. Even in later summer many prefer to stable such calves, because flies seem unusually ir- ritating to these young animals. Oats are an excel- lent grain for calves on pasture. Weaning from milk is a matter which should not be hasterted. While four months on milk is more nearly the usual period of feeding, six months is better when it can be done Suns Lf. the calves are receiving grain liberally at weaning time, there will follow but a very light shrinkage, much lighter than in the case of sucking calves. The cost of raising a skim milk calf was deter- mined at the Kansas Station by averaging the re- sults of thirteen different experiments, the average REARING CALVES ON SKIM MILK. 1 Be period of feeding being 125 days. With skim milk at 15 cents per hundred, grain at 50 cents per hun- dred and roughness at $4 per ton, each calf con- sumed milk costing $2.52, grain $1.27, roughness $1.51, while labor cost $2.13, making a total of $7.43. The patent calf feeders, as put on the market, are easily contaminated, because the nipples are diff- cult to clean. This seems to be the chief reason why those who have tested them are unfavorable to their use. Dehorning Calves.—Stock cattle without horns ordinarily outsell horned cattle of the same quality from 15 to 25 cents per hundred, which is the strongest kind of an argument in favor of dehorn- ing. The operation is simple and causes so little discomfort to the animal if done on calves by means of caustic potash, a brief statement concern- ing the use of the caustic seems pertinent. When the calf is three or four days old, clip the hair from where the rudimentary horns, or buttons, later appear, and with a stick of caustic potash, wrapped at one end to protect the fingers, rub over the button until the skin becomes a little inflamed and more or less tender to the touch. A scab will appear after a few days and further growth of the horn will cease. Caustic is exceedingly painful if allowed to run down over the face. This work should be done before the horns break through the skin, necessarily within a few days after the birth of the calf. Shelter for calves is important in winter, because small cattle are much more susceptible to cold weather than larger ones. Straw bedding should be used liberally to keep the ground dry and to provide a comfortable bed. Shelter during the hot summer weather is also desirable because of troublesome flies. Calves should not, however, be deprived of sunshine the entire day. If confined II2 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. during the middle of hot summer days, they should be given the privilege of the pasture lot the re- mainder of the day for both light and exercise. In winter, calves should have the sun’s rays as much as possible. Fresh, pure water should be provided in addition to milk. Salt is also needed. For convenience it can be placed in a box nailed within the shelter, where the calves may lick it whenever so inclined. Loose salt is preferable to rock salt. With the exercise of skill and attention to details, calves may be reared on skim milk very success- fully. Probably no animals of any class are more responsive to skillful treatment. It is certainly a less expensive method of producing the first few hundred pounds of beef than to permit the calves to draw whole milk from the dam; and, while they may have less bloom and rotundity of form, they will have sufficient digestive capacity to insure good future gains. ~ REAR VIEW OF CALF STANCHIONS AS USED AT THE KAN- SAS EXPERIMENT STATION. PAK Hl BEEF CATTLE CHAPTER XI. BEEF TYPE. Meat as a Food.—Notwithstanding the fact that there exists a class of people known as vegetarians who are using their influence against the consump- ‘tion of meat, the industry promises to continue. Americans are particularly fond of meat. We have the reputation of being the heaviest meat-consum- ing nation in the world, and many attribute much of our rapid social and industrial advancement to this fact. Meat is too high in price to be used as a staple article of food in the Old World except in the more wealthy families. The study of more eco- nomical methods of production, to keep the supply in America more nearly at a pace with the growing demands of an increasing population, would seem, therefore, to be of vital interest to consumer as well as to producer. Nearly all meat consumed comes from domesti- cated farm animals—cattle, sheep and swine fur- nishing by far the larger part, though fowls must be given recognition for their place in meat as well as egg production. These classes of animals will be discussed in the order given, because of a greater similarity between the first two in the matter of food requirements. 113 II4. PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. Quality of the finished product has been men- tioned as one of the two important factors in profit- able feeding. Quality is important because it means a higher price per pound for the meat animal when marketed, though produced at no greater cost for food consumed. It is obtained by feeding prop- erly balanced rations to animals of good type. A meat animal is of good type, (1) which prom- ises when properly fattened to satisfy the demands of the market, and (II) which also has sufficient vigor of constitution and power of assimilation to make satisfactory gains in the feed-lot. I. Percentage of Dressed Weight Influenced by Type as Well as by Fatness.—The market calls for an animal which will, first of all, dress with- out excessive offal, or waste. Other things be- ing equal, the fatter the animal the higher the per cent of dressed weight. This is true because the meat animal is both a manufacturing institu- tion and a storehouse for its own goods. As the fattening process goes on, weight is added to the carcass with little or no increase in the weight of the machinery. The importance of condition in its relation to selling price will be better understood by the state- ment that a thin 1,200-pound steer worth 5 cents per pound on foot, dressing 50 per cent, would yield enough more meat, were it fat enough to dress 60 per cent, to make it worth 6 cents per pound in- stead of 5. But fatness alone does not determine the per- centage of waste. Individual specimens of cattle, sheep, or swine in the same condition vary in per cent of waste, because some individuals are nat- urally heavy in those parts which constitute offal. Unimproved animals, commonly called scrubs, dress with more waste because they have not been bred 0 i i ce lie! ~ es * a a ee eee BEEF TYPE. 115 for thick carcasses. The dairy breeds of cattle when fattened are likely to have more waste than the beef breeds, because they are larger in paunch, or barrel. The mutton breeds of sheep dress higher than the wool breeds, while the so-called ‘lard’ breeds of swine dress higher than the bacon breeds. In the matter of market carcass requirements for cattle, sheep and swine there is a marked similarity, so much so that whatever is said concerning beef carcasses will apply in a general way to sheep and swine, with exceptions as hereafter stated. Beef Carcass Requirements.—A choice beef car- cass (1) should be proportionately heavy in those parts which sell for the highest prices and corre- spondingly light in the cheaper cuts. (2) It should not be heavy in bone. (3) It should have a pre- dominance of lean tissue. (4) The fat should be evenly distributed over the carcass, not occurring in patches or “gobs,” and flakes of fat should be dis- tributed between the fibers of lean. (5) The lean fibers should not be coarse, and they should be light red rather than dark in color, and tender in charac- ter. (1)- Large Proportion of High .Priced Meat.— To be profitable on the block the beef animal must be endowed by Nature with a broad back, which covers thickly with meat as the fattening process nears completion. The importance of the broad, thick back will be at once apparent by re- ferring to Fig: 1, which shows the location of each market cut of beef and the retail price per pound in the average Western market. The price which the consumer is willing to pay for these different cuts is a good criterion of their relative values. In the markets of large Eastern cities, where there is more wealth, the choicer cuts sell relatively higher, because there is a greater demand for them. 116 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. * 2 MS . . ? ~ Figure 1.—Angus steer, side view, showing butcher’s cuts Live weight, 1,550 Ibs.; dressed weight, 1,046 lbs. tetail prices (western): (1) neck, 40 Ibs. at 4 cts.; (2) chuck, 237 Ibs. at 7 cts.; (3) prime of rib, 117 lbs. at 12% cts.; (4) porter- house steak, 103 Ibs. at 18 cts.; (5) sirloin steak, 87 lbs. at 15 cts.; (6) rump, 36 lbs. at 10 cts.; (7) round steak, 183 lbs. at 10 cts.; (8) shank, 30 lbs. at 2 cts.; (9) flank, 52 Ibs. at 4 cts.; (10) ribs plate, 138 lbs. at 5 cts.; (11) shank, 23 Ibs. at 2 cts. Figure 2.—Jersey steer, side view, showing heavy middle and light hind quarters. Hi | BEEF TYPE. £t7 Fig. 3—Rear view of the Angus and Jersey steers, showing strong contrast in the development of back, loin, rump, and thighs. (1) Rib cut from the Angus steers, wt. 117 Ibs., 11.1% of the carcass. (2) Rib cut from the Jersey steer, wt. 70 lbs., 10.1% of the carcass. 118 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. From the diagram it will also be seen that the hind quarter has valuable meat, though somewhat less valuable than the back. It is important, there- fore, that the finished steer should have a broad rump and full, wide thighs. The cheaper cuts are the plates, neck and shoulder, none of which should be excessively large. : (2) Bone. Sais. proportion of bone to meat should not be large, as the consumer does not wish to pay meat prices for bone. Some individuals possess altogether more bone than is necessary. This is particularly true of the unimproved types of cattle. To illustrate what has already been said con- cerning beef type, the reader is asked to compare the high-grade Angus steer shown in Fig. 1 with the high-grade Jersey, in Fig. 2. The Angus weighed 1,600 pounds and the Jersey 1,230 pounds, although the Jersey was three months older. The rations fed these steers were the same in character, and both animals were fat and ripe when slaugh- tered. The Jersey dressed 7 per cent less than the Angus; and of the 7 per cent more offal in the Jersey, 3 per cent consisted of fat deposited about the stomach, intestines and kidneys—worth in the retail market 2 cents per pound. This is an illustra- tion of the greater dressing capacity of the good beef type over the inferior. The larger middle of the Jersey, as seen in the illustration, is enn consistent with the figures given. By referring to Fig. 3 we fae a rear view of the same two steers, showing the broad, thick back and loin, full rump and wide, full thighs of the Angus as compared with the Jersey. T he fullness of flesh well down and toward the gambrel, permitting the retailer to cut round seats much lower on the Angus, is strongly brought out in the photograph. BEEF TYPE, 119 In this case no one would maintain that the Jersey had as much high-priced meat as the Angus. The picture of the rib cuts in these two steers shows a larger proportion of this choice meat in the Angus. While the Jersey in the illustration does not show an extremely heavy bone, it is much more pro- nounced than in the Angus. The smooth, well- covered Angus has the appearance of a package of beef with only enough bone to give it permanency of form. In the Jersey, or inferior butcher’s type, bone stands out prominently—hips, shoulders and ribs being poorly covered. (3) Predominance of Lean Desirable.—Individ- ual specimens vary considerably in the proportion of fat to lean. In a recent carcass test with high- grade Angus steers fed in the same manner, the writer found that the lean muscle which extends over the back measured in one case four inches thick, while in another individual it measured four and three-fourths of an inch in thickness. The steer with a 4-inch muscle had a covering of 134 inches of chine fat, while the steer with a 434-inch muscle had but 1 inch of fat covering. This differ- ence was not due to feed or breed, but rather to a difference in type. When undergoing judgment on foot, the steer whose back presented less fat and more lean showed a firmness under pressure of the hand, while the fatty steer was soft. (4) Evenness of Flesh.—A certain amount of fat covering, however, is desirable, inasmuch as it pro- tects the lean during the ripening process. Meat is very much more tender and palatable after it has hung in the coolers a few weeks and has been allowed to ripen. If it is not covered with a layer of fat, it becomes tainted from exposure to the atmosphere. It is neither necessary nor desirable, however, to have the fat layer excessively thick. 120 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. There are some individuals, more commonly in cer- tain beef breeds, which have a tendency to accumu- late fat in patches, or gobs. In the live animals this is most noticeable about the tail-head. It also occurs as rolls over the ribs. Such accumulations of fat are undesirable, because they must be cut off as so much tallow worth but a few cents per pound. Fat should not only be evenly distributed over the carcass, but a certain amount should also be found distributed between the fibers of lean as flakes. This makes the lean more tender and juicy. Ani- mals which have a firmness of flesh free from patches are likely to have this admixture of fat and lean. (5) Meat Fiber.—Meat inclined to be coarse in fiber is less tender and palatable. Coarsness in bone and hair is usually associated with coarseness in meat grain. In the live animal we therefore have a guide which is indicative of quality in the grain of meat. Tenderness of fiber is a question of age more than of type. Old animals, no matter how good in type or finish, must be sold at a discount, because the meat will be tough. ‘The three-year- old steer would not be considered past its prime in this respect. At any rafe, the market makes no discrimination against three-year-old beeves_ be- cause of too much age, though more age than this is undesirable, even from the butcher’s point of view. II. Feeder Requisites—The utility of the ani- mal on the block is in itself important, but it is not the only requisite of good type. An animal may fully satisfy the demands of the butcher, and yet not be profitable to the feeder because of failure to make satisfactory growth. From the feeder’s viewpoint an animal (1) should be capable of mak- ing large daily gains from a given supply of food, and (2) should mature early. en BEEF TYPE. 12! Gaining Propensity.—In the capacity for making gains, we find a wide variation among individuals of the bovine race. Some steers are known to have gained as high as four pounds per day for a short period, while others, even under forced feeding, have gained but one pound per day. A difference of .50 per cent in the rapidity of making gains is not at all unusual, even when in the same condition of flesh. The big gainers consume more feed, because they have stronger powers of assimilation, but they are more economical feeders, inasmuch as less food is consumed to make a pound of increase in weight. The capacity for making gains is largely a question of inherent vigor and active powers of assimilation. External Indications of Gaining Capacity.—For- tunately for the man who buys cattle for the feed-lot, there are certain external qualities which serve as an index to feeding capacity. (1) The abdominal cav- ity, occupying the middle of the animal, should be toomy. A steer, slender and tucked up in body, is un- able to utilize a large amount of feed and therefore cannot make heavy gains. There should be not only good depth and breadth of body in the abdominal region, but this breadth and depth should extend for- ward to include the chest cavity. (2) A lack of width through the chest would indicate that the vital organs, including lungs and heart, are restricted ‘in development. An animal having poor chest develop- ment is invariably a slow feeder. This seems reason- able in view of the fact that the lungs and heart play so important a part in purifying the blood and for- cing it to circulate throughout the entire system. The blood being the medium which carries off worn- out tissue and replaces it with fresh matter taken from the digestive tract, is a most important factor in digestion and assimilation. If there is a lack of lung development—indicated by narrow chest, slen- 122 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING, Good feeder but poor butcher’s type. Grade Angus steer; age, two years, ten months; weight, 1,850 Ibs. A remarkable feeder, as indicated by a powerful chest and large abdomen, but a poor killer because of too much forequarter, excessive plates and gobby fat. 'This steer was the heaviest of a lot of twelve choice Angus steers, but his carcass was valued at $1 per cwt. below the others. ; A South Omaha “sunfish.’’ An inferior type from the viewpoint of both butcher and feeder. a et re eer BEEF TYPE, 123 der neck at the base, and small nostril—the oxida- tion, or purification, of the blood must be corre- spondingly slow. (3) An active, healthy cir- culation of blood, and active digestion and as- similation are also indicated by the character of the skin and the hair. The outer skin is a continuation of the inner skin, which constitutes the stomach and the intestines. If the outer skin is dry and harsh, lacking in pliableness, we may expect a poorly nourished inner skin. A soft, pliable skin, cov- ered with a thick, mossy growth of soft, fine hair, oily in appearance, is almost a certain indication of active digestion and assimilation of food. Drawing the skin between thumb and forefinger is the surest way of determining its handling quality. In buy- ing steers for the feed-lot, however, this is not often possible, because of the timidity of the animal. A feeder of long experience learns to‘ associate a bright, healthy coat of luxuriant hair with gaining capacity. He learns to avoid the skin having the appearance of being drawn tightly over the body. These are qualities which may be observed by the eye. Gaining Capacity a Question of Type Rather Than Breed.—The ability to make rapid and eco- nomical gains is, therefore, a question of type rather than of breed. Several experiment sta- tions have at various times conducted so-called breed tests, in which one or two specimens ot each breed, both dairy and beef, have been fed in comparison with steers of unknown breeding, com- monly called scrubs. These tests have not proved that one breed is superior to another, nor that steers of the beef breeds are superior as gainers to all dairy bred steers and natives. Where a representative of a cer- tain breed made the largest gain in one test, a repre- sentative of a different breed came out ahead in another 124 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. GRADE HBERE- FORD. Age, one year and six months; weight, 1,065 pounds; gain 2.3 pounds per day. GOOD TYPE INFERIOR TYPE—GRADE . HEREFORD. ; Age, one year and ten months ; 3 weight, 900 pounds; gain, one pound per day. = BEEF TYPE, 125 test. These tests have been unsatisfactory from a feeding point of view, because not enough individuals of any one breed were used. They have been of value, in that it has been abundantly shown that rapidity of gains is a question of type and condition, not of breed. We often find native steers with strong, vigorous con- stitutions and they are good gainers, at least for a limited period. Steers from a dairy breed like the Hol- stein-Friesian usually have strong assimilative powers, and there is no reason why they should not make large daily gains. We find an occasional Jersey of good feeding capacity. Most individuals of this breed, how- ever, are of more delicate constitution and do not re- spond so well in the feed-lot. In a recent test at the Nebraska Experiment Station, grade Angus and Here- ford steers two years old gained 75 pounds per month, while Jerseys of the same age, fed in the same way, inferior in type, gained but 50 pounds per month. The beef steers required 7% pounds of grain for one pound of increase, while the Jersey steers consumed 8% pounds of grain for one pound of increase in weight. This much is true: there are many more desirable feed- ing types to be found in the improved beef breeds than in dairy breeds or natives of unknown breedings. On this subject of the relation of type to gaining capacity the Illinois Experiment Station has re- cently furnished the most satisfactory and reliable data yet found. ‘Six different market grades, 16 in each lot, were fed the same rations. These were what are called fancy, choice, good, medium, com- mon and inferior. Unfortunately, some classes were considerably heavier than others, which puts them at a disadvantage and therefore gives us less satisfactory results for a comparison of each of the six grades. But for a comparison of the two principal classes, good and common, we have valuable 126 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. data. The average initial weight of the 48 steers of the three best grades, fancy, choice and good, was 1,022.8 pounds each. The average weight of the 48 steers of the three poor classes, called medium, com- mon and inferior, was 984 pounds each. We thus see that if there is any advantage on account of lighter weights to begin with, it is in favor of the common steers. The average daily gain of the good steers was 2.48 pounds per day; of the common steers, 2.10 pounds per day. The good steers consumed 11.37 pounds of dry matter for one pound of increase in weight, while the common steers consumed 12.66 pounds of dry matter for one pound of increase. This was 11 per cent larger gains in favor of the good steers over the inferior from the same weight of food consumed. Early maturity means the tendency of an indi- vidual to become sufficiently fat at an early age to satisfy. the demands of the market. The importance of this will be better understood by giving a few figures. -If an average steer is well fed with grain from the age of twelve months to the completion of his third year, he will gain, as a yearling, about two pounds per day; as a two-year-old, about 13% pounds per day; and as a three-year-old, 1% pounds per day. He therefore makes the largest daily gain in early life and makes it on less food. If, how- ever, we compare a thin two-year-old with a thin yearling, we shall find the former capable of making the heavier gains, though less economically. Avera- ging six different trials where accurate records were kept of gains and cost of food, it is found that during the first 12 months each 100 pounds of increase in weight costs $3.45; the second 12 months in the same animal, $7.42; and the third 12 months, $11.50. It is apparent, therefore, that if a steer can be made ripe for market before he reaches the BEEF TYPE, 127 age of three years, the profits will be considerably greater. Some steers, no matter how well fed, can- not be made sufficiently fat at the age of two years. Their increase in weight is in the nature of growth of frame rather than thickness of meat. The tendency to mature early under liberal feeding is a question of type, or conformation. Twenty-five years ago practically no beef steers were marketed as two-year-olds. This was partly because most cattle were then of the late-maturing type and could not be made sufficiently fat at two years, and partly because the markets then called for heavier cat- tle. Today the well-rounded 1,200-pound two-year-old commands practically as high a price per pound as the large-framed three-year-old of equal flesh. Because of this and the fact that the younger steers are more economical feéders, as previously shown, it is impor- tant for the feeder to be able to select the early-matur- ing kind. On the range and in the farming dis- tricts, we find both the early and late-maturing types, although during recent years breeders have been selecting for earlier maturity, and conse- quently there are many more individuals of that type than formerly. Exterior Indications of Early Maturity—The feeding steer to mature early must be compact and blocky in build. The long-legged, lanky kind, wide- spaced from hip to rib, is invariably one which will require an extended period of forced feeding to be made fat enough for market. Such steers in a feed-lot must be withdrawn and fed longer, or sold at a sacri- fice. If they are fed until finished, others must be carried beyond the profitable stage for marketing. The shape of the head and neck is often a help in selecting steers for early maturity. Usually a short, broad head and short, thick neck go with a short, broad body and short legs. It is always the low- FEEDING, TABLE STOCK 4 PROF 128 “Challenger, sity of 70% of fat and nationa * Grand Champion steer International Live Stock Exposition, 1903. Nebraska. Desirable from viewpoint of both butcher and feeder. live weight. Broad and thickly covered over back, loin and hind Univer- Carcass quarters ; lean well marbled. Gained 4 Ibs. per day for three months preceding Inter- 1 Exposition, 129 TYPE. BEEF “Challenger,” front view, showing width of chest. “Challenger,” rear view, showing breadth of hind quarters. 130 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. down, blocky steers which mature early. In some individuals the early-maturing type is carried to the extreme, in which case there is often a lack of size. Such individuals are most. profitable when marketed as soon as fat, regardless of size. Blocky Steers Easier Keepers.—It is worthy of note, too, that the blocky, early-maturing steers are also easier keepers, in that they require less grain in proportion to hay for laying on flesh and keeping in good condition. This is well shown in the records of 12 low-down, blocky, Angus steers marketed by the Nebraska Experiment Station. During the first winter, as calves, six made an average gain of 33 pounds‘each per month on prairie and alfalfa ~ hay, without grain. The remaining six gained 60 pounds per month on but four pounds of mixed grain each per day, with a liberal allowance of hay. The following summer all were given grass only, and the second winter a light grain ration. They were finished with grain on grass the next summer, and in November, at the age of 29 months, averaged 1,480 pounds each, and were good enough for Christmas beeves. During the two years, these steers consumed but 5.7 pounds of grain for one pound of increase in weight, or about 15 per cent less than is ordinarily required with common grades. The Ideal Beef Steer.—From what has been said on butcher’s type and on feeder’s type, it will be seen that while certain qualities are desirable from both points of view, there are other qualities in which the butcher and feeder are at variance in their demands. As already pointed out, the feeder wants a steer with good bone, a good roomy paunch and deep, broad chest, while the butcher considers undue development in such parts objectionable, be- cause of excessive waste and too large a proportion BEEF TYPE. 131 “Shamrock’’—Grand Champion. steer at the Chicago International Live Stock Iixposition, 1902. Iowa Agricultural College, Ames, Iowa. “Clear Lake Jute’—Grand Champion steer, Chicago International Live Stock Exposition, 1904—Reserve Champion, 1903. Uni- versity of Minnesota. 132 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. of the less valuable meat. Giving both butcher and feeder due consideration, a certain standard of per- fection, called “scale of points,’ has been adopted for the beef steers, in which each part of the animal is given a numerical value according to its impor- tance, the whole footing 100 per cent for what would be a perfect animal. The following, sug- gested by Craig, is in use among most agricul- tural colleges. The writer has submitted it to the ithe. judges of England, Scotland and Amer- ica. Some have suggested slight changes; others make none. It is quite postible that somewhat more importance should be given to chest, rump and thigh, although these parts are all included in “form,” which is given 10 points. Score-card for Beef Steer— - General appearance: Weight; accordine toa ge 22). snus eetes «nike eee 10 Form, straight top line Sana underline; deep, broad, low Bet, Stylish is s.c)sa0s cee ere ee eee 10 Quality, firm handling, hair fine, pliable skin, dense bone, Gvenly (fleshed 35 3 )sscreis woe saps cde ree nee: ce Paneer oat 10 Condition, deep even covering of firm flesh, especially in regions of valuable (cuts...) . cuca et enn een 10 Head and neck: Muzzle broad, mouth large, jaw wide, nostrils large.... 1 Hyes large sclear. placid. 2, ton ends ease fontaine eee 1 Mace short quiet expResslO0 a. hirer ernie tet siet eres 1 Horeheade broad, sulle ean ess oe case pits 1 Mars_ me cdiim-size sein ey be xts UC ope aries rate kate fede see meee 1 Horns; fine texture sovel, medium: SIzGo se ni.0cnetieleis lense 1 Neck thick, short, throaty cleans alco. 2's, < s\ ern. es apes ernie 1 Forequarters: ‘ Shoulder tein: jf) Ween aes jceeuevepedenayara cee tests oie oaeie eee eae 2 Shoulders, covered with flesh, compact on top, smooth.... 2 Brisket advanced); breast, widen. saeicet hi ere “ok Dewlap, skin not too loose and drooping.............. is Legs straight, short; arm full, shank fine, smooth...... 2 Body: Chest, full, deep, wide, girth large, crops. full.......... 4 Ribs, long,arched,, thickly” flesheds .o 22 < stewrse seit 8 Back, broad, straight, smooth, even...................- 10 Lom, thick, road Lis sine ec aeitesiugat {sheietele tale 8 te»: erat aca 8 Flank, full, even with underline. ....---ce-- ese sess oes 2 BEEF TYPE, ~ 133 Hindquarters: Hips, smoothly covered, distance apart in proportion with Ge TS MTSE SWS) oe iho Sa RE ee Cn i aR Ce 2 Rump, long, wide, even, tail head smooth, not patchy.... 2 Pin bones, not prominent, far apart.............-..+5 1 Seige bss Ful AED WEG E w cvs xiote aint acein, oye. vice no 8m Bas one 2 AD WIRG, = Gea p WiVATA: cio < oa slalelame se Wal eueisteis «= apni e's! 's =" 2 Purse, full, indicating fleshimess.....0. 2 20. Gee. sere ees 2 Legs, straight, short, shank fine, smooth.............. 2 TPS CELI ks i aaa aR ae oP ar go 10e The score-card, while of no particular use to an experienced and competent judge in making show ring awards, is of value to the amateur in mak- ing a detailed examination of an animal. By its use he learns the relative importance of the various parts of the animal and becomes more familiar with what constitutes ideal beef type. After the correct type is fairly well fixed in mind, its further use is not recommended. More can then be accomplished by close comparisons of individuals without re- ferring to a score-card. To a man conducting feeding operations, a fair conception of what constitutes the most desirable type in beef cattle is of the utmost value. In buy- ing feeders on the market, where the assortment is large and prices asked for different lots are ex- tremely variable, injudicious purchases are easily possible, and are often made. Sometimes too much is paid for the choicer grades, when the less desir- able kinds are offered at a price below their real value. Usually the better grades are more profita- ble in the end, even at prices somewhat higher. This is particularly true when feed is high-priced. When a purchase is made, the privilege is often given the buyer to cull out a stated number. Ina- bility to discover the most undesirable individuals in a lot, will result in a useless scaling of profits from feeding. ; 134 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING, The Selection of a Herd Bull for Dairy Herd of Grade Cows.—While we have been depending very largely upon the range country for our feed- ing steers, many cattle are now being both grown and fattened on farming lands. In order that we may breed good cattle for feeding purposes, it is highly important that we give to the selection of the herd bull the consideration it deserves. Since “Like begets like” is a fundamental law of breed- ing, we must naturally seek in the herd bull the same general type that is most desirable in the market steer. We could hardly expect broad- backed, thick-quartered steers from fish-backed, peaked buils, nor a low-down, early-maturing type from a rangy sire. Whatever, then, has been said concerning the desirable form for the steer will ap- ply as strongly to the bull. Prepotency.—But no matter how perfect a bull may be in form, if he fails to transmit his characters to his offspring he is not a satisfactory animal. To be prepotent he must have been bred pure for several generations, or until the characters are fair- ly well fixed—the longer he has been bred pure the more firmly fixed are his characters. A grade or cross-bred bull seldom has firmly established characters, and therefore will not ordinarily re- produce his type with any degree of certainty. On the other hand, a line bred, or inbred, bull is likely to be very prepotent, because his breeding has been confined not only to one breed, but to a certain family in that breed. Close inbreeding, however, is not usually to be recommended in pure-bred herds, because it may result finally in a weakened constitution and oftentimes barrenness. For cross- ing upon grade cows, a bull of moderate inbreeding, good in conformation, is rather to be preferred. There are certain external characters denoting “i 7 ao 135 PE BEEF TY ion 1] and International. » Nebraska. SS ,—__ Live “Stock Exposition, G. W. Lindsey. 136 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. masculinity in individuals, which also indicate pre- potency. They are: a strong, broad head; a full, bright eye, showing vivacity; curly hair about the face; a thick, strong neck with a well-developed crest ; strong shoulders; and a broad chest. A pure- bred bull, possessing these strongly masculine char- acters, bred to grade or mixed bred cows, is more than half the herd, because the offspring from such a mating are likely to resemble the sire much more than the dam on account of his greater prepotency. This is a matter which is too often overlooked in purchasing a bull. If a grade bull can be bought for a small sum there is a temptation to reject the more costly pure-bred. One hundred and fifty dol- lars more invested in a good pure-bred bull means a cost of one dollar more per calf, assuming that the bull gets thirty calves per year for a period of five years. This is rather an insignificant sum in comparison with the increased value of a calf from such a sire. A pure-bred bull, inferior in type, is for the same reason worse than a mixed-bred of the same type, because more of his calves are likely to be inferior. No one, whether ranchman or farmer, with a fair-sized herd of cows, should be content with anything less than a pure-bred bull of good conformation and quality, whether it be a Shorthorn, Hereford, Angus or Galloway. The choice of breeds will depend more upon locality, and is less important than the selection of a good individual. The Profitable “Farmer’s Cow.”—In farming dis- tricts, where land is high priced, the dairy cow is rapidly growing in popular favor. In fact, it is now generally admitted that anywhere outside the so-called grazing territory, or range, a grade cow to be profitable must be a good milker, as it does not pay to keep a cow one year for the calf she ee ol BEEF TYPE. LNT 3? Shorthorn bull—‘‘Choice Goods’—an American and English cham- pion and a noted breeding sire. Tebo Land and Cattle Com- pany, Clinton, Missouri. Hereford bull—‘‘Prime Lad.’’ An American champion. W. H. Van Natta & Sons, Fowler, Indiana. 138 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING, produces, unless it be in a locality where farming land is best suited for pasturing purposes. The butter or cheese made from a good cow amounts to $40 or $50 per year, which, deducting the cost of labor, much more than pays for the feed she con- sumes, But cows pre-eminently suited for economical milk production are not satisfactory beef producers, nor are the calves when such cows are bred to dairy bulls, as has been shown. Since a good cow, properly handled, may be milked with profit for a period of at least eight years, and during this time will produce, upon an average, four heifer calves, it is apparent that for maintaining a dairy herd of cows, only one-fourth the cow herd need be bred each year to a dairy bull, or the entire herd may be bred to such a bull once in four years. All other calves are available for beef production and should be sired by a beef bull! Bulls of Extreme Beef Tendencies Most Suitable for Beef Calves from Dairy Cows.—lIt is important in selecting a beef bull that he should carry the type to..the extreme, in order to. cover up,jas ait were, the dairy type of the dam. He should be extremely low set, closely coupled, broad over the back and loin, wide and deep quartered and natu- rally thick-fleshed, possessing in a marked degree easy keeping qualities. A mixed-bred, heavy-milk- ing cow mated with such a bull will produce a calf which, if not the choicest beef type, will be found entirely satisfactory in the feed lot—quite above the average range steer. The writer’s experience upon a farm, where such a*system is still in practice, has been limited to the use of pure-bred Shorthorn and Angus bulls upon grade Shorthorn and Holstein milch cows. The results were most satisfactory with a low-down, compact, pure Scotch Shorthorn bull and an Angus ad BEEF TYPE, 139 buil of the same type. A large number of the cows produced enough milk to suckle two calves each, for a period of five months, and a third calf the remaining five months. A part of the herd acted in this capacity, the larger portion of the milk being used for cheese making. Calves so handled are very good for the production of baby beef; and, with a large herd of dairy cows to consume the roughness, the method of heavy grain feeding to be pursued with the calves for the production of baby beef is a most satisfactory one. The heifer calves from such sires are also fed out for young beef, rather than reserved for dairy purposes, be- cause of their beef tendencies. Old cows are re- placed from outside sources, or a few of the best milkers are bred annually to a dairy bull, vealing all male calves from such matings. The Angus bull now in service has produced three crops of calves, all black or dark gray in color, and with but one out of ninety having horns, though several had smali rudimentary ones about one inch in length. These calves were mostly from grade Shorthorn cows leaning toward the dairy type. The heifers in the first crop sold in the fall, as yearlings finished on blue grass, at $4.50 per hundred, while the steers were grain fed as “long yearlings,” weighing, at’ 23 months, 1,200 pounds each, and bringing $6.10 on the market, or 15 cents below top prices for heavy cattle. At the Nebraska Experiment Station a Short- horn-Jersey cow which produced 375 pounds of butter per year for five years, when bred to a pure- bred Hereford bull gave birth to a calf which weighed 1,300 pounds at 22 months of age, fairly good in type, though peaked behind. The following year from an Angus bull the cow produced a calf 140 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING, which weighed 1,200 at 21 months of age, better in type than the Hereford; and a year later from a Shorthorn sire, a calf weighing 1,250 at 21 months, equal in quality to the Angus, both being broad behind and fairly well covered, though less thickly than high grade steers of the beef breeds—good enough, however, to sell near the top of the market. Calves from Jersey cows bred to beef bulls are less satisfactory for beef production than are those from other dairy breeds. Such cows are small in size, less robust in constitution, and it is quite im- possible to produce anything but peaked hind quar- ters, so objectionable to the feeder. If the Jersey cow has considerable blood of another breed the calves are likely to be better for beef purposes. It is not unusual for grade Shorthorn cows of dairy conformation to give twenty quarts of milk per day. Such cows are excellent for producing beef calves, when bred to blocky, thick-fleshed bulls. The Hol- stein cow is our heaviest milker. She is also large in scale, strong in constitution, and active in assimt- lative powers. When pure she is unusually persis- tent in transmitting her own characters to off- spring. A grade Holstein cow, however, bred to a beefy bull, usually produces a fairly good feeding animal, though later maturing and coarser than the . Shorthorn. It was a common Shorthorn-Holstein grade cow, bred to an extraordinary pure-bred Hereford bull, which produced Challenger, the In- ternational Champion steer for 1903. While this is more than should be expected from such a cow, it could hardly be called accidental on her part, since she produced the following year another calf from the same bull, which won second place in a strong class of grade steers at the International show. The Iowa Experiment Station, in making a sum- mary of results as published in Bulletin 48, issued BEEF TYPE. 141 in 1900, says concerning the combining of dairying and beef making: “rt. From the results so far obtained through these trials it+is evident that a system whereby dairying and meat making may be combined is the most promising in. profits. Not only do the steers from cows bred with this combination in view yield as much profit as those from the range, but the cows when used for dairy purposes make profitable returns. “2. The data secured through the actual work of establishing a herd of this kind and the actual test of the cows in the dairy and steers in the feed-lot show that it is not only possible to combine these qualities to a profitable degree, but also to perpetuate them if the herd is bred especially for them. “3. In the commercial production of beef through a combination of dairying and beef mak- ing it is necessary that the calves are removed from their dams when two or three days old so as to develop and preserve the milking qualities of the cows.” Angus bull—‘Bugler.” Showing extreme development of masculine character. Very blocky, and useful for producing beef calves from dairy cows. University of Nebraska. PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING 142 ‘U0IWBIS JUITITIodxG vB MOT ‘SMOD TIOG}104g Q o Uy ALU Avy 0} poiq [nq 1oy,IOYS AjJooq B wo1y s 199}8 plo -IBd4-OM, CHAPTER XII. SHELTER AND FEED-LOT FACILITIES FOR BEEF CATTLE. The shelter problem in cattle feeding is of im- portance, since it influences materially the cost of producing beef. When it is understood that the temperature of the animal body under normal con- ditions is 98° Fahrenheit, it is apparent that a con- siderable part of the day’s ration must go to pro- duce heat, much of which is constantly leaving the body by radiation from the surface. This loss is most rapid when the temperature of the air is con- siderably below the normal temperature of the body. On cold winter days, for example, when the body is fully exposed, the loss is very great, and there is in consequence a heavier draft upon the food for fuel purposes. Cattle are endowed by nature with a thick skin and a good coat of hair to check this loss of heat by radiation, and this . protection during moderate weather is sufficient. Then, too, after having been fed for beef for some time cattle have more or less fat distributed over the body just underneath the skin, and this gives addi- tional protection. Such cattle generate more or less heat as a by-product, as it were, during the rapid as- similation of food, which serves to warm the body, more especially when the ration is highly carbonaceous. Because of this fact, if fattening cattle are confined in closed barns, as is sometimes practiced—particu- larly in Eastern States—they are likely to be un- comfortably warm—too warm for a good appetite and large gains. On the other hand, the Western 143 144 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING, practice of feeding cattle outdoors, unprotected in any way, requires the consumption of considerable food solely for the purpose of heat lost by ex- cessive radiation, which food is far more costly than shelter. The Missouri Shelter Tests—The Missouri Ex- periment Station during several successive winters conducted tests to determine the influence of shel- ter upon gains. Each winter two-year-old steers were divided into three lots; one was provided with a closed but well-ventilated barn, another with a shed closed on all sides except the south, and a third with an open yard, a tight fence being the only protection. These cattle were all cared for in exactly the same way, each lot being given a ration consisting of corn and tfmothy hay and those in the barn allowed the run of a yard on pleasant days. The average results for each steer in the several lots were as follows: the average daily gain per steer in the closed barn was 1.7 pounds, in the shed 1.92 pounds, and in the open yard 2.05 pounds. The barn steers consumed 10.6 pounds of corn for each pound of gain, the shed steers 10.4 pounds, and the open yard steers 9.98 pounds. Combining both hay and grain, the barn steers consumed 14.79 pounds of feed for one pound of gain, the shed steers 14.12 pounds, and the open yard steers 14.22 pounds. The results show in favor of the shed and open yard steers as compared with the steers fed in the barn. The difference in favor of the shed steers in this series of experiments is hardly great enough to pay for building sheds. Had the ration been a balanced one instead of being excessively, starchy, the result would undoubtedly have been still more favorable for the use of the shed as com- pared with the open yard. Corn and timothy hay were used, because that combination is one common- ly fed in Missouri. Director Waters, the experi- SHELTER FACILITIES FOR BEEF CATTLE. 145 menter, says: “While the difference between the gains of the bunches in the open shed and the open lot do not indicate a large advantage in favor of the open shed, yet from every point of view it seems fair to say that where much winter feeding is to be done it will be profitable to provide suit- able shelter for the cattle, the feed and the manure, and particularly to give the cattle a dry place on which to lie. From these experiments it does not appear to be necessary or profitable to attempt to make such quarters warm.” In a Kansas test 10 per cent of the feed was saved by providing an open shed. The Pennsylvania experiments also show in favor of shelter. As a result of several thousand letters of in- quiry sent out by the Missouri Experiment Station to cattle feeders in Missouri, Illinois, Iowa and Nebraska, it was found that 17.6 per cent of those re- sponding favored the closed barn, 59.2 per cent the open shed and 23.2 per cent the open lot. From the investigations in Missouri and other States it is ap- parent that there is danger of overhousing as well as underhousing fattening cattle. Such cattle are not likely to be uncomfortable, even during cold weather, so long as they are protected from cold winds and have a dry bed. The latter is more necessary than is ordinarily supposed and a roof is no doubt worth more than its cost for this pur- pose. It would seem that in the Northern States especially, some sort of a shed open on the side opposite prevailing winds is most satisfactory for fattening cattle. Shelter for Stock Cattle—For stock cattle the sit- uation is different. They are not crowded with grain and do not have so much fat for protection. A small animal also presents a larger surface in propor- tion to weight than does a larger one, making the loss of heat from radiation relatively greater. The Mis- 1406 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. souri Experiment Station carried on shelter tests with stock cattle as well as fattening cattle. In com- menting upon the results of the test with light cattle in contrast with fattening cattle, Director Waters says: “We have carried on this experi- ment for four years with yearlings, one winter feeding them on hay only and three winters on a small quantity of corn and what timothy hay they would eat. The result was altogether the other way: dhe bunch in the barn came out 1m the best condition by far, with a better coat, ete. It would be the same way with any other class of cattle if due care is taken not to overhouse and to keep their quarters well ventilated.” Young cattle, especially when fed largely upon hay, need shelter closed on all sides, with enough open doors on one side to permit them to pass in and out at will. There should be enough openings to give good ventilation at all times. Location of the Feed-lot.—In choosing a _ loca- tion for the feed-lot, attention should be given to drainage and natural protection. Whenever possi- ble, the yard should be situated on a south slope, so that water will drain off quickly after a rain and the ground will receive the full benefit of the sun’s rays. Muddy yards are not conducive to good gains. This is a matter of common observation among feeders during winters when there is con- siderable rainfall. Experiment station records also show that monthly gains made when yards are muddy are considerably below the monthly gaiws made when yards are dry. In some cases the soil is sufficiently open to permit the rapid percolation of water downward, while in other localities the soil is so nearly impervious that pools form at the surface, or the water mixes with the clay to make a most dis- agreeable mud. At the Illinois Station, where such SHELTER FACILITIES FOR BEEF CATTLE, 147 a condition exists, paving was found to be entirely practicable. Bedding, whether in barn or lots, should be used liberally, because it not only adds materially to the comfort of the animals, but it actually saves feed. One who has scattered a load of straw in a bare feed-lot will vouch for the statement that cattle are quick to lie down and rest when encouraged to do so. A condition of mud or frozen clods in the yards is greatly improved by using straw liberally. If it is thrown in one place, that spot becomes ele- vated and furnishes a dry and comfortable bed. A well-fed steer lying contentedly upon his side is making the best possible use of the feed in his stomach. He will not lie down in mud and filth until forced by exhaustion to do so. Standing or walking means an unnecessary muscular exertion, which requires food. Fattening cattle should be kept as quiet as possible. No better use can be made of wheat straw or refuse hay and stalks than to scatter them about for bedding, where such ma- terial will also serve as an absorbent of liquid manure. Salt should be given regularly to all kinds of cat- tle. To make sure that enough is supplied to meet physiological requirements it is advisable to keep it before them at all times. A box of salt may be nailed to the side of the fence where cattle will have free access fo it, or, better still, underneath the shed, where it will keep dry. When supplied in this way cattle will not eat more than is good for them, unless the box is allowed_to become empty for a time. If cattle become hungry for salt, they are greedy and eat so much that the tissues are made dry, owing to the strong affinity of salt for water; this causes such intense thirst that water in excess is imbibed to the detriment of digestion and assimilation. 148 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. Ground rock or common pulverized salt is prefer- able to rock salt, though the latter is preferred by some for cattle on pasture, because it is not dissolved by rains. The chief objection to the latter is that cattle are required to spend too much time licking the rock, which time would be better spent eating grass. Another objection to rock salt is that its rough surface may cause the tongue to become sore. For summer feeding, a box of com- mon salt kept underneath a swinging cover or a roof built at some central point in the pasture is most satisfactory, although regular salting once a week is not a bad practice, inasmuch as cattle on grass without grain are sometimes left unobserved for long periods, when they should be counted and otherwise inspected at frequent intervals. Pure water should be made accessible to cattle both winter and summer. The system calls for water to serve in the elaboration of animal compounds and to transport these compounds from place to place in the body. Tissues must always be kept moist. A large quantity of water leaves the animal with the breath and must be replaced. The water always present in foodstuffs is not sufficient to meet de- mands, and more must be supplied from outside sources. Animals never drink too much water under normal conditions. They will not drink enough for best gains if the water is in any way offensive, hence the importance of pure water. In cold weather cattle do not, as a rule, drink enough, because of the chill- ing effects of ice cold water. This is especially true with stock eattle and dairy cows. The milch cow. as already mentioned, must be given every possible inducement to drink freely, because in the elabora- tion of milk compounds more water is needed than in the elaboration of meat compounds. The tank SHELTER FACILITIES FOR BEEF CATTLE, 149 heaters described for dairy cows are also useful for steers during freezing weather. Dipping for lice, mange, etc., is preferably done when cattle first go into the feed-lot, if done at all, because a lighter shrinkage follows. In localities where such troubles are common, it is wise to em- ploy this safeguard. With a good dipping plant the process can be made a short one and any of the approved dipping solutions, whether the sulphur- lime or coal tar preparations, may be purchased at a small cost. A pair of good backs—‘“‘Challenger II’ and “Stanton,” University of Nebraska, CHAPTER XIII. BABY, BEEF, In discussing the details of feéding for beef it is taken for granted that the reader has gone over the chapters on general principles in feeding all classes of live stock and those chapters on feeding the dairy cow. Feeding the cow logically precedes feeding the steer, and whatever was said concerning foods for the dairy cow applies in a general way to beef cattle, and should first be given consideration by the reader. In feeding for beef, the system to be practiced will depend upon the locality, and to some extent upon the season. In some sections the soil and climate are especially favorable for the production of grass and hay, but less so for corn, making the latter high in price; or feeding for pork may be carried on so extensively in some localities as to make grain in demand at strong prices and rough- ness a drug on the market. In other sections grain may be reasonably low and rough feed high in price. The season is a factor in any locality in so far as it affects prices on foodstuffs from year to year, necessitating the exercise of business sagacity in the use of those foodstuffs which go the farthest for the money. Feeding for beef resolves itself into two. general methods: the production of early fattened beef, which is called “baby beef” when carried to the extreme, and: the production of older beef by a larger use of rough- ness and a more gradual process of grain feeding. Arguments for Baby Beef.—On those farms 150 alti mgt dato ins ens ? = - BABY BEEF. 15! where roughness can be profitably used in other ways, the production of early beef has two distinct advantages. I. Young stock require less food for a given gain than older stock. Records show that for each succeeding year up to the age of three or four years _ nearly 50 per cent more food is required for a given increase in weight than was required the year previous. Much of this difference is no doubt due to the fact that as the steer grows older and larger, he also be- comes heavier in flesh, which always means smaller gains from a given weight of food. At the Illinois Experiment Station in 1904 one car-load each of range-bred calves, yearlings and two-year-olds was purchased from Wyoming. None having been ac- customed to grain, they were therefore uniformly thin in flesh. Each lot was given the same kind of food, viz., corn which had been run through an ensilage cutter, cotton-seed meal, alfalfa hay and some oat straw and shredded corn stover. De- ducting the pork produced, the net cost of pro- ducing 100 pounds of gain on the calves was $4.10, on the yearlings $5.60 and on the two-year-olds $6.60. This means that the cost of producing gains Was 37 per cent more on yearlings than on calves, and 18 per cent more on two-year-olds than on yearlings. The calves weighed at the begin- ning 384 pounds, the yearlings 784 pounds and the two-year-olds 1,032 pounds each. That young ani- mals make better use of food seems entirely rea- sonable in view of the fact that nearly half of a full feed is required for maintaining a constant weight. ‘The larger the animal the more food is required to keep up body heat, replace worn out tissues, force the blood to circulate and do other necessary work; and a smaller proportion is therefore converted into flesh and fat. 152 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. II. The same capital invested in young stock produces more beef than in older stock. The man who produces his own feeders also realizes his profits sooner in baby beef than in older beef. The existing conditions favorable to early feeding are (1) the availability of low-down, blocky types of cattle which respond well to early heavy feeding, putting on fat and flesh rapidly without a large development of bone; and (2) the status of the present day market, which pays practically as much for small cattle of high finish as for the larger 1,400- pound cattle more com- mon in former 1s Whole Milk Calves Best for Making Early Baby Beef.—For the production of early baby beef, calves which have been allowed plenty of whole milk fresh from the cow are most suitable, because they are in — better flesh at weaning time. Such calves should be fed grain just as soon as they can be encouraged to eat. A mixture consisting of equal parts of wee oats, bran and shelled corn is very satisfactory for young calves receiving milk. Whole grain is ordi- narily more attractive to calves than ground grain, because the, whole grain is always fresh, while the ground grain is sometimes tainted fron: exposure to the air. Shelled corn is brittle and easily cracked by young calves. Probably no grain is more relished by them, regardless of the fact that it is too starchy for their good when fed alone. Bran, rich in protein, off- sets the starchy corn and with oats satisfies the craving for something bulky, needed to properly ~ develop the ruminating powers. Bran is also an excellent bowel regulator, useful in connection with a whole milk diet. Oats tend to check scours in all animals. No single food is better to supplement milk for growing calves than whole oats, but the mixture of the three foods is more satisfactory. If bran is not available, one-half the same quantity of oil-meal or BABY BEEF. 153 eluten meal could be used instead. Grain feeding be- fore weaning not only saves milk, but, more than that, it lessens the shrinkage which is likely to fol- iow weaning. By full feeding on grain at weaning time, very little shrinkage is occasioned when the milk is withdrawn entirely. ~ Feed After Weaning.—The secret of feeding after weaning is to hold the milk flesh and keep the calf putting more on top. At this age it is natural for a calf to develop frame. If flesh nd fat are to keep pace with this bone development, heavy grain feeding is the only recourse. All the grain the calf can be made to consume without taking the edge off his appe- tite is the best guide to follow. This is where skill and watchfulness are rewarded. At this stage the calf should have about one-half corn, one-fourth vats and one-fourth bran. With spring calves a late summer pasture of blue-grass will furnish any protein lacking in the grain ration. If no blue-grass pasture is avail- able and the calves are stable-fed, the roughness should consist very largely of clover, or alfalfa, since both of these plants are rich in protein and are relished by calves. Feed During the First Winter.—In producing baby beef there should be no cessation of heavy grain feeding. The first winter, corn should be increased to form at least 60 per cent of the grain ration. If oats are high in price, as they usually are in com- parison with corn, it is better economy to feed three-quarters corn and one-quarter bran, or, if bran is high, seven-eighths corn and one-eighth oil meal. Should the roughness consist in part of corn _stover, timothy or prairie hay, somewhat less corn and a Jittle more bran or oil meal should be used, since such forms of roughness, are, like corn, too starchy. In the absence of clover, alfalfa, or cow- pea hay, 20 per cent of oil meal could be used. All 154 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. the rough feed such beeves will take should be sup- plied. With the close of winter, at the age of 12 months, a calf under such treatment should weigh from 800 to 1,000 pounds and be fat enough to market. Finishing Baby Beeves on Grass.—It is often more profitable to full feed on grass until about July I, since cheap gains can be secured during the summer with corn on grass, and somewhat less grain would be required the previous winter. If some feed like oil meal, cottonseed meal or gluten feed can be had at a reasonable price, it could profitably form Io per cent of the grain ration, and if the pasture is timothy or prairie grass, 15 to 20 per cent would be needed. Baby beeves 14 to 18 months old, weighing from goo to 1,200 pounds, are more profitably handled by packers than are heavy cattle in summer, and are therefore in greater demand at that season. Skim Milk Calves for Baby Beef.—Skim milk calves are as a rule larger in frame, carrying less flesh at weaning time than the calf well nourished on whole milk. It is for this reason that skim milk calves can seldom be finished for baby beef before the age of sixteen or eighteen months has been reached. This, of course, depends large.y upon the skill displayed in raising the calves. The econdi- tion of flesh at an early age is also very largely gov- erned by the type of the animal, those on the short- legged, blocky order ripening much more quickly than the leggy kind. Heifer calves may be profitably made into baby beef for several reasons. (1) Heifer calves natu- rally take on flesh more rapidly than steer calves under like conditions. (2) They are not likely to be with calf at this early age, for which reason buyers are willing to pay as much per pound for a fat heifer under 18 months as for a steer of the same BABY BEEF. 155 quality and condition. (3) After a certain age is reached, usually about twelve months, heifers come in heat at intervals of 21 days. This period of heat lasts about two days, during which time not only the one individual loses in weight, but others in the herd are more or less excited and lose there- by. This loss can only be overcome by watching the herd and by separating each animal that comes in heat—which, of course, involves labor—or by spaying all females. Spaying heifers is a much more difficult operation than castrating male calves, resulting in some shrinkage and not infrequently in the death of the animal. Feeding for baby beef is the best solution of the heifer problem. The prices on young “she stuff” at our Western markets are often such as to make the feeding of that class more profitable than steer feeding. Angus Baby Beeves fed by the Illinois Experiment Station. CHAPTER XIV. FEEDING YEARLING STEERS FOR BEEF. In the preceding chapter on “baby beef,” the ad- vantages of early fattening were pointed out. But this method also has its limitations and its disad- vantages under certain conditions. Where beef raising is not carried on in connection with dairy farming, the cost of keeping the cow one year is charged to the calf she brings up. In other words, the calf, in starting upon its career of beef produc- tion, has hanging over it a debt for its creation. If the calf is sold at the age of twelve months, this sum, which may be only $12, is charged to one year’s growth; if sold at the age of 24 months it is distributed over two years’ growth, making it $6 for each year.. The feeder market gives recog- nition of this fact by quoting calves about 25 per cent higher per pound than yearlings of equal qual- ity. Owing to the birth cost of an animal it is not always profitable to cut off its life tco early. Then, too, in the production of baby beef, heavy grain feeding is resorted to from start to finish. In converting any concentrated: feed, as grain, into meat, the pig is a much more economical pro- ducer than the steer. For example, up to 200 pounds in weight, a pig will consume during life an average of about four pounds of grain for each pound of increase in weight. In the production of baby beef marketed at the age of 16 months, there will be required nearly five pounds of grain and some roughness for each pound of increase. The ruminants—cattle and sheep—with their four 156 FEEDING YEARLING STEERS. 157 stomachs, are naturally consumers of roughness, in the large use of which the pig is handicapped and can not compete. There is grown on every farm considerable roughness in the shape of cornstalks, hay and the like, which would command but a very low figure if placed on the open market. It is for the utilization of this cheap roughness that the steer has a place. Only in the cow or sheep has he a substitute for this work. When such animals are not present in sufficient number to consume all roughness, then it is better economy to feed the steer, more of such feed and correspondingly less grain, even though more time is required to get him on the market. This has been especially true during recent years, when corn has been high in ‘price. With modern types of cattle, which natur- ally mature earlier than formerly, it is not neces- sary to extend the feeding period beyond the age of 24 months, even with a liberal feeding of rough- ness during the first year. : Amount of Grain the First Winter.—Just how much the grain ration may be profitably reduced - the first winter is not definitely known. During two winters experiments have been carried on at the Nebraska Experiment Station to throw some light on the relative economy of hay with and without grain for calves. During the winter of I9goI-’02 Angus calves, weighing 500 pounds each, were divided into two lots, one lot fed hay without grain, the other fed four pounds of mixed grain per day. In both lots the hay was largely alfalfa of good quality, with just enough prairie hay to prevent scours. An average monthly gain of 33 pounds was secured on hay alone. The grain lot made an average gain of 60 pounds per month. With good hay, then worth $8 per ton, it was found that each 100 pounds of gain with grain cost but 158 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING, $4.60, while without grain the same gain cost $6. This was a large saving. in favor of light grain feeding during the first winter in comparison with no grain. The following summer, however, when both lots were placed in the same pasture, without grain, the steers previously given no grain made a gain of 10 pounds per month more than the winter grain fed calves. The latter, however, were enough better in quality to.make this light grain feeding during the winter about 15 per cent less costly than without grain for the whole year. The following winter fifty Hereford steer calves were divided into three lots. One lot was fed hay alone, one hay and three pounds of grain daily, and the third hay and six pounds of grain daily. At this time alfalfa and prairie hay were each worth $6 per ton. The gain of those having no grain with hay cost $7 per hundred pounds, while the gain of those having three pounds of grain cost $4.95 per hundred, and those having six pounds of grain cost $4.35. By the end of the year, all: having been summer pastured, without grain, at a cost of $4 per steer, the lot having three pounds of grain the previous winter made gains at a cost of $3.14 per hundred, while the lot receiving no grain made gains at a cost of $3.17, and the lot re- ceiving six pounds, $3.46 per hundred. No doubt the “no grain” calves consumed more grass, which would put them at a somewhat greater disadvan- tage than the figures denote. The records from | these experiments, then, would indicate that, for the first year’s feeding, a light grain ration during the winter with good roughness is mere econom- ical, when no grain is fed the following summer, than either no grain, or a grain ration as high as six pounds per day. Character of the Ration—The successful utiliza- 159 FEEDING YEARLING STEERS, Ran ge-bred Her eford calyes used in the exper iment to determine the most ec the first winter’s feeding, onomical pr opor tion of og 5 r ain to hay for 160 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. tion of a large quantity of roughness during the first winter's feeding depends very largely on the kind supplied and its quality. Well cured alfalfa, clover and cowpea hay are best, because any of these, with corn, makes a fairly well balanced ration for calves; though a ration with so large a quan- tity of alfalfa contains really more protein than is necessary, and something like cornstalks, oat straw or cane, fed in smal! quantity with it, cheapens the ration and at the same time lessens its tendency to produce scours. Should the roughness consist en- tirely of timothy hay, prairie hay, cornstalks, sor- ghum, millet or straw, then it will be necessary to feed about three-fourths corn to one-fourth linseed or gluten meal. If bran is-used it should form about half the grain ration with corn. Oats are not especially rich in protein, but when the price per- mits are a very useful adjunct to corn. Corn silage is excellent for wintering calves, if a little supple- mentary protein is supplied. Being succulent, it makes young cattle sappy and well prepared for future growth. Tabulated Rations for Calves.—Following is a table showing the nutrients in each of two rations recommended for a 500-pound calf which is to be fattened as a yearling the following winter: Dry Carbo- Nutritive matter. Protein. hydrates. Fat. ratio. Red clover, 12 Ibs...... 10.1 .82 4,29 220) Carmesa iba. tice ss atc. 2.6 24 2.00 plies Bopalar irae ses eect lonn, 1.06 6.29 33 1:6.6 Alfaltaved UGS spices dees 6.4 77 210 .09 Corn stover, 6 lbs...... 3.6 10 1.94 04 Corn ow lbSmensteyre crt ks 2.6 24 2.00 13 BM OUa er ate vese te te Serta eat 6.71 .26 1:6.6 FEEDING YEARLING STEERS. 161 Fall and Winter Feeding.—With good grass pas- ture, without grain, following a winter’s feed con- cisting of roughness with three or four pounds of grain fed to each calf daily, a gain of 40 to 50 pounds per month may be expected during the en- tire year, and sufficient flesh will be put on to make practicable the second winter’s heavy grain feeding. Yearling steers may be left on pasture as long as they have an abundance of feed and the weather is not too cold. In the more Northern States it is usually found advisable to remove from pasture field to feed-lot late in October or some time in November, unless provision is made for feeding some grain in the field. Yearling steers are less able to stand exposure to cold winds than are two-year-olds, for which reason they should go to the feed-lot fairly early. Not having been fed grain during the sum- mer, feeding should begin by making the ration very largely roughage, alfalfa, clover or cowpea hay pre- dominating, with either cornstalks, sorghum, prairie hay or oat straw to furnish variety and at the same time to act as a preventive of scours, which is not uncommon when alfalfa is fed in large quantity. About three pounds of grain per steer the first day is quite enough. There are usually some steers which do not eat grain the first day, and if more than this is supplied the others get too much. This amount may be increased one pound every other day until an allow- ance of nine pounds has been reached, when the further increase should be somewhat more gradual, say at the rate of not more than two pounds per week. With fifteen pounds per day at the end of the fifth week, the steers will be eating about all the grain they will care for, so long as good roughage is supplied in abundance. It is not practicable to weigh roughage for cattle. They should receive all they will con- sume without excessive waste. Coarse stems con- 162 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. tain but little nourishment, and cattle can hardly be expected to eat them. It is not economy to force cattle to clean out the racks containing rough feed so completely that they will consume less of such feed than they otherwise would, and therefore de- mand more grain. In no case let the change from grass to heavy grain feeding be made too sud- denly. The system must be given time to adapt itself to the new conditions; if not, digestive dis- orders may result, and this means no little sacri- fice to profits. Five weeks for this change is none too much time. Character of Rations.—A yearling steer weighing, January 1, from 800 to 900 pounds, supplied with 15 pounds of grain per day, will consume something like 8 pounds of hay. If this is alfalfa or cowpea hay, the grain, at average Western prices, for most profit- able gains should be corn alone, at least so far as investigations to date indicate. For most perfect digestion either shelled corn or corn meal is rather heavy. This compactness which prevents a ready admixture of digestive juices in the stomach is easily overcome by grinding cob and corn together, or by feeding crushed or broken husked or snapped corn, the latter name designating ear corn within the husk. When corn, cob and husk are passed to the stomach ground together in a mass, we have a mixture easily penetrated by the gastric juice and other digestive fluids and entirely safe for forced methods of feeding. Corn without cob is some- times made more bulky by mixing it with bran or cut hay, but usually at greater expense than with ground cob. With clover, however, bran is entirely practicable, inasmuch as a little more protein is then desirable, though if corn and cob meal is easily obtained, the extra protein is often more cheaply. furnished in linseed, gluten or cottonseed meal. FEEDING YEARLING STEERS. 163 Without Legumes for Roughage Protein Concen- trates Are Needed.—In feeding timothy or prairie hay, cane or any roughage of which one of the legumes —clover, alfaifa or cowpea hay—is not made a part, it is decidedly advantageous to use a protein concen- trate with corn, more so with yearling steers than with older cattle. From what has been said concerning the lack of protein, or flesh-making material, in corn and all hay plants except the legumes, it is at once ap- parent that a protein concentrate is needed. In a test at the Nebraska Station in 1904, yearling steers on corn and.alfalfa made an average gain of 1.97 pounds per day during a six months’ feeding period, while a lot on corn and prairie hay gained but 1.35 pounds per day. Thirty-six per cent more feed was re- quired for each pound of gain on corn and prairie hay than was required on corn andalfalfa, and, as the market price on both kinds of hay was the same, the cost of producing gains was correspondingly higher on corn and prairie hay. The net profit on corn and prairie hay was 38 cents per steer for the six months’ feeding, while those in the alfalfa lot each returned a net profit of $8.66. In another lot, where the roughage consisted of prairie hay and the grain ration was go per cent corn and Io per cent oil meal, the average daily gain was 1.91 pounds as compared with 1.35 pounds without oil meal. In this case’ 33 per cent more feed was required for each pound of gain when the oilmeal was left out of the ration. With prairie hay worth $6 per ton, corn 60 cents per hundred (33 cents per bushel) and oil meal $1.25 per hundred, each pound of gain without oil meal cost 21 per cent more than with oil meal, and each steer in this lot returned a net profit of $4.76 as compared with $.38 without oil meal. Where the oil meal was added the steers could be induced to take more feed, 164 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. which, no doubt, partially accounted for their more economical gains. The nutritive ratio of the oil meal ration was 1 pound of nitrogenous material to 8 pounds of the non-nitrogenous, while the nutritive ratio of the poorly balanced ration, consisting of corn and prairie hay without oil meal, was 1: 10.4— yet the latter ration is one very largely used in the West. In a ration consisting of corn, 90 per cent; oil meal, 10 per cent; and corn stover (stalks without ears), in which the nutritive ratio was 1:8, the daily gain was 1.96 pounds per steer, and the cost of pro- ducing gains just as cheap as on corn and alfalfa. This ration produced g per cent larger gains for the same weight of food consumed than were made on corn, oo per cent; oil meal, To per *cent;-and) sor ghum hay, a ration in which the nutritive ratio was approximately 1:9. The 50 steers in the experiment described were finished for market at the age of 24 months, aver- aging 1,120 pounds each, when they sold for as much per pound as older cattle of the same qual- ity. These steers consumed during the first winter, as calves, an average of 2.9 pounds of grain each per day, and during the second winter, on full feed, 15.6 pounds each per day. For each pound of live weight at the time the steers were sold, they had consumed during both years an average of three pounds of grain and the same weight of hay. This, of course, does not include the milk and grass pas- ture received as calves, nor a second summer’s pas- ture as yearlings. It confirms what has been said, that finishing “long yearlings” permits a larger use of roughage, requiring less grain per pound of beef than is required in the production of “baby beef.” CHAPTER XV. FATTENING STEERS WITH GRAIN ON PASTURE. Finishing Two-Year-Old Steers With Grain on Grass.—-In feeding out yearlings for a spring mar- ket, as just described, while the grain feeding is light the first winter, one is compelled to use grain very liberally all the second winter, in order to se- cure a marketable finish by May, and if the cattle are inclined to bea little rangy in type, it is frequent- ly necessary to feed into June. Early June is often fairly cool in the Northern States, and the markets at this season for the lighter weights, like yearlings, are usually good; but later in the month hot weather becomes oppressive for fat cattle and flies begin to be troublesome, making it difficult to se- cure a reasonable gain. With a good pasture field on the farm, it is possible to save grain by feeding sparingly during the second winter as well as the first, finishing on grass the following summer. Some use no grain the early part of the second win- ter. At the New Mexico Station yearling steers gained 1.36 pounds per day on alfalfa alone, and at Arizona 1.5 pounds per day. In localities where corn is relatively high in price, and hay and grass are abundant, finishing steers on grass is often profitable. Cattle fed on grass xe- quire less grain for a given increase in weight than when winter-fed on hay and grain.» The nutritious and palatable grass seems to take the place of grain to a limited extent. There are two ways of feeding 165 166 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. grain on grass: one is spring and early summer, the other late fall and early winter feeding. Feeding Grain on Grass in Early Summer.—As- suming that the steers have had a fairly liberal supply of grain the previous winter—perhaps half a full-feed or more—it is better to continue the grain on grass, supplying all.they will take and market- ing as soon as ready, which will probably be some time in July. Great care should be exercised in mak- ing the change from dry hay to green grass. If it is sudden there is sure to be a shrinkage. Cattle are prone to fill up on grass if given the first op- portunity, which brings on scours, often flushing out the system to such an extent that it means the loss of a month’s growth. ‘It is not likely to hap- pen if the change is made gradually. There are two ways of doing this. One is to turn the cattle on grass for but a short time at first, lengthening the period a little each day. The other is to allow the cattle the run of the pasture just as soon as the first blades appear in the spring. They are then able to get but very little grass at first, but more each day thereafter as the grass grows larger. There are two disadvantages, however, with this method of feeding. First, in early spring the sod is likely to be soft, becoming badly trampled if cattle are allowed to run upon it. This makes it neces- sary for cattle to be shut off for a few days in case of heavy rain, and they will eat too much grass when turned on again afterward. The second dis- advantage is that early pasturing does not permit so large a yield of grass, because it has no chance to make a start. A large blade can elaborate much more food from air and soil than one kept small by a continuous cropping off; for this reason a larger yield of grass can be had by keeping stock off the field until it is well started. Therefore, although it GRAIN ON PASTURE. 167 involves more labor, it is probably better to keep the cattle off pasture until the grass has a few weeks’ growth, turning on for an hour the first day, increasing tne length of time each succeeding day until the cattle remain permanently in the pasture. By this method they get grass very gradually, and do not shrink in consequence. Besides being a safe method, this is also a practical one when there are many in the herd. Character of the Grain Ration on Grass.—On a pasture containing an abundance of clover the grain may consist entirely of corn, the clover sup- plying sufficient protein to make up what is lack- ing in corn. Alfalfa would do the same, though it has been found unsafe to pasture clear alfalfa be- cause of bloat. If timothy, brome-grass or some other grass is mixed with alfalfa this difficulty may be overcome. It was recently found at the Ne- braska Experiment Station that steers pastured on ° mixed grasses, consisting of blue-grass, brome- grass, meadow fescue, prairie grass and a little al- falia made better gains when fed oil meal with corn than when fed corn alone. During a summer period of 30 weeks five two-year-old Angus steers were fed an average of 17.8 pounds of shelled corn each per day, making an average daily gain of 1.63 pounds. Another lot of five steers of the same kind were each fed 17.8 pounds of grain per day, consisting of 90 per cent shelled corn and 10 -per cent oil meal. These steers made an average gain of 2.02 pounds per day during the same time. The pasture was alike in both lots. Those fed corn and oil meal required but 8.8 pounds of grain for one pound of increase in weight, while those fed corn _ alone required 10.9 pounds. With pasture worth $3 per acre, corn worth at that time 33 cents per bushel, and oil meal $25 per ton, each 100 pounds 168 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. ee “2 Grade Angus steers used in the Nebraska Experiment. ‘Corn vs. corn and oil meal on grass.” GRAIN ON PASTURE. - 169 of gain on corn alone cost 13 per cent more than on corn and oil meal. In this experiment, if the oil meal had cost $44 per ton, instead of $25, nothing would have been saved by feeding it. The results, though from but a single experiment and therefore not fully authoritative, indicate that corn and mixed grass of this kind do not supply sufficient protein. Those fed oil meal were much less troubled with scours, which may partially ac- count for the difference in favor of the oil meal lot. Cottonseed meal or gluten meal could be substi- tuted for the oil meal, or bran might answer the purpose, though fully twice as much, amounting to 20 per cent of the grain ration, would be needed. With pigs running behind the cattle, dry shelled corn may be used. Oil meal in nut form, the pieces be- ing about the size of kernels of corn, mixes very well with shelled corn, and blows out of open feed- ing bunks very much less than the finely ground meal. In this form, too, oil meal is less likely to be adulterated. Without hogs, corn should be fed ground or soaked. Soaking is cheaper, but care should be taken that it does not sour. In warm weather, shelled corn soaked 12 hours in a tight wagonbox will be quite soft and is not likely to sour. It will be understood that soaked corn should not be fed in such quantity that some will be left in the feed bunks to sour after the feed. Cattle two years old fed grain on grass in early summer can be made to make large gains, and they should be good enough to market before flies be- come very troublesome. To ship with small shrink- age, grass-fed cattle should be removed from the pasture one or two days before shipment and fed dry hay with little or no grain. If the cattle have had less rather than more than half a full feed of corn during the previous winter, 170 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. very satisfactory gains may be secured on good grass without grain. If the grass is dry rather than watery during mid-summer and fall, a fair quality of beef may be made without any corn for finishing, though enough better prices usually are obtained to make corn feeding profitable, noticeably so when corn is not too high priced. Ina Nebraska test, when corn was worth 4o cents per bushel, bran $16 per ton and pasture $3 per acre, grain-fed steers returned a net profit of $5 each, while grass without grain gave a net profit of but $2 per steer. The market that fall, however, was unusually favorable for grain-fed cattle. Fall Feeding Corn on Grass.—The new corn crop during most seasons is sufficiently ripe to cut and shock about September 15 in the Northern States. At that time a little may be drawn to the field to be fed in the stalk. . With this system: thevcagre have no grain in early summer. Four pounds of corn per steer will answer for the first feed, this amount to be gradually increased until the cattle are on full feed, about October 15. When 2uul erain-fed, the cattle will consume less than half of the staik, and, unless stock cattle can be turned in afterwards, much will be wasted. Under such circumstances it as better to Substitute, an spank snapped corn. Cattle can be fed in the field until snow falls, which may be December 1 or later, at which time they should be ripe enough to bring a good price on the market. If, for any reason, the supply of grass is short, enough shock corn may be fed to furnish roughness, and the protein may be supplied by using bran, oil meal, cottonseed meal or gluten feed. In order to feed some one of these protein concentrates, it will’ be necessary to feed part of the corn shelled or ground to serve as a mixing medium, Half the corn fed in the stalk Ol e Sterns ate ies Aer GRAIN ON PASTURE. 171 will supply sufficient roughness, and the other half may- be fed as shelled corn or ground corn and cob, in which is mixed one-fifth, by weight, of one of the concentrated protein foods mentioned. Feed-racks are necessary for field feeding, unless the pigs can be turned into the lot after the cattle have been fed—a matter easily regulated by call- ing the pigs into an enclosure each night, where they are given a slop consisting largely of shorts, per- mitting them to go out after the cattle have finished, which is usually near noon. In that case corn in the stalk could be scattered on the sod. One distinc- tive advantage which comes from scattering corn on the grass is that something in the shape of fertiliz- ing material is distributed over the pasture each year. Fields continuously pastured lose fertility unless something from outside sources is fed on the land, or barnyard manure is spread over the pas- ture at intervals. Feeding grain on pasture is more satisfactory because less labor is involved. Old blue-grass pastures are by far the best pastures, if the land is not allowed to deteriorate; the grass then becomes less abundant and weeds of various kinds make their appearance. By keeping up the fertility as suggested, avoiding close pasturage, per- manent grass lands can be maintained which will produce yearly a large number of pounds of beef. A 10o-acre pasture field owned in part by the writer has pastured cattle continuously for over 30 years, and it is still producing highly nutritious blue-grass in abundance. In these days of scarce labor a good, permanent pasture field is a boon to every farmer. CHAPTER XVI. WINTER FEEDING RANGE TWO-YEAR- OLD STEERS. Range Steers Sell as Feeders in the Fall.—A very large proportion of the steers two years old and over, fattened in the corn belt, are grown on the range lands of the West and Southwest. The farmer who raises the steers he feeds for market is hardly justified in holding them until they reach the age of 34 to 36 months, as is customary with range two-year-olds. Finishing in the fall on shock corn or snapped corn, or still earlier as yearlings or baby beeves, is more profitable. But with range steers the bulk of the offerings do not come to mar- ket until late fall, which makes winter feeding of that class the most common practice. Grain Fed Sparingly at First.—In feeding range cattle it is well to buy not later than November, in order that they may be started on corn slowly, yet finished before late May or June, when hot weather comes on. Range steers are often very thin in flesh because of a scarcity of grass, and in that condition it is much better to feed liberally on hay, at least the first six or eight weeks. Thin range steers frequently make a gain of 2 pounds per day the first two months, on an average feed of 8 pounds of grain per day, with all the good roughage they will consume. Not only does this gradual process of grain feeding remove all danger connected with the change from grass to grain, but hay used lib- erally seems to distend the digestive system, giving 172 FEEDING RANGE TWO-YEAR-OLDS. 173 larger capacity for future grain feeding. Cattle from the range, without this distention, are not the heaviest gainers. If cattle are in condition for heavy grain feeding early, 5 pounds per steer can be fed the first day, though 3 or 4 is more often better. The increase of grain should be made as has been suggested for yearlings, a full feed being reached in not less than five weeks, a little more time being preferable in most cases. Character of Winter Rations for Two-year-olds. —What has been said concerning the character of winter rations for yearlings will apply in a general way to steers two years old, though the latter re- quire less protein and are, therefore, more profitably fed wider rations. A ration, however, made up of corn and timothy hay, or any other non-nitrogenous roughage, will not supply two-year-olds with suff- cient protein for profitable gains. At the Missouri Experiment Station corn and clover hay gave 29 per cent larger gains for grain consumed than corn and timothy hay. At the Illinois Experiment Station corn and clover effected a saving of 22 per cent of the grain required for a given gain, as compared with corn, timothy and corn stover. -This was un- questionably due to the lack of protein in the latter ration; for, when gluten meal, a concentrated pro- tein food, was supplied, there was required 24 per cent less grain for a given gain than without it. The nutritive ratio of the three rations fed is as follows: corm and | clover, 69.45, ‘corm, timothy and) corn stover, 1:13; corn, timothy, stover and gluten meal, 1:9.4. The average of three tests at the Kansas Station shows that by using bran, shorts and oil meal to balance the ration, 28 per cent less grain was required for a given gain than when corn, stover and prairie hay were fed. In an Iowa experi- 174. PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. ment, where oil meal, cottonseed meal and gluten feed were used in separate lots in comparison with corn not thus supplemented, there was an average saving of 19 per cent of the grain fed, by the use of the supplemental foods. Had not a little clover been used toward the close, no doubt the saving effected by the use of these foods would have been still greater. In a Nebraska test conducted in 1905 with thin range steers, corn go per cent, oil meal 10 per cent, and prairie hay required a little over 5 per cent less grain per pound of gain than was required by corn and prairie hay without oil meal. This was a rather small saving compared with the 23 per cent on year- lings the previous winter. In the two-year-old test the oil meal cost $28 per ton and the corn 39 cents per bushel. With the small saving by the use of oil meal and with this food high in price, the cost of producing one pound of gain was practically the same in both lots. With the ten steers fed oil meal, however, a much earlier finish was secured, such as to make them bring $5.25 in Omaha as compared with $5.10 for the ten fed only corn and prairie hay—this, too, on an even start six months pre- vious. With all steers costing $4 per cwt. deliv- ered, and the oil meal lot selling for $4.98 net on home weights and the other lot $4.78, there was a net profit of $1.09 per steer with oil meal and a net loss of $1.12 per steer without oil meal. Had the oil meal cost $41.19 per ton instead of $28, the loss would have been the same with oil meal as without. Protein Roughage Usually More Profitable Than Protein Concentrates.—As has been suggested for dairy cows, a protein roughage is often more eco- nomically fed in connection with corn than is a more costly commercial protein food. In the Nebraska test just referred tc, alfalfa and corn gave 14 per cent ——— es FEEDING RANGE TWO-YEAR-OLDS. 75 larger gains, and correspondingly larger profits, for grain consumed, than prairie hay and corn, and 10 per cent larger gains than prairie hay, corn and oil meal. Stated in another way, prairie hay, valued at $6 per ton, fed with oil meal proved equivalent to alfalfa at $8.28 per ton, and without oil meal equiv- alent to alfalfa at $11.14 per ton. With oil meal cost- ing $28 per ton, alfalfa returned a value of $13 per ton in comparison with it. In an Illinois test, gluten meal at $28 per ton, fed in connection with timothy and corn stover, returned a slightly larger profit than corn and clover, the latter being then worth $11 per ton. Corn Stover With Alfalfa Cheapest.—The alfaifa and.corn ration in the Nebraska test gave a nutritive ratio of 1:7.4. Apparently these steers were able to stand a ration still wider, as another lot of ten in the same experiment fed equal parts of alfalfa and corn stover required but 7.89 pounds of corn for one pound of gain as compared with 8.14 pounds with alfalfa alone, or 3 per cent less. The stover and alfalfa ration had a nutritive ratio of 1:8.4, which is added evidence in favor of something like 1:8 in preference to a ration more narrow for two-year-old steers. The stover in this experiment was figured at $2.50 per ton, a high valuation for a fodder allowed to go to waste in Western fields. This combination pro- duced gains at a cost of but $6.49 per hundred com- pared with alfalfa and corn at a cost of $6.89 per hundred, the alfalfa and corn ranking second in point of economy among the five lots fed in the experiment. With alfalfa worth $6 per ton as fed with corn, the stover returned a value of $4.63 when made one-half the roughage with alfalfa. The stover seemed to be well relished, though of course the stubs, or lower third, of the stalk were refused and were thrown out Lot. 1, Steers fed corn and prairie hay. Lot 2. Two-Year-Old Steers 176 Steers fed corn, 90%; oil meal, 10%, and prairie hay. Cost, $3.90 per hundred ; selling price, $5.10. ‘ost, $3.90 per hun- : dred; selling price, $5.25. ; in a Nebraska test to show the effect of oil meal in a ration of corn and prairie hay. ‘ZG'TS ‘190s tod JyOId ‘19038 Jad JYOId "98'S ‘Aes od yO ‘19038 dod JYOrd “SLTS$ ‘toe}s tod ssory Jueo JS'y ‘1s0D ‘s]u90 6F'9 “}S0,) ‘sJue0 68'°9 °“}S8O) sJUe0 J2Z'8 °*380,) ‘SJUo0 ¢3°8 ‘3S0D ‘sql Sg ‘ABq wnys.10g ‘S(L ZG ‘ddA0}S-UIG,) ‘Sql GF “ABY OLLI “q1 6 ‘TBea [LO ‘SL ZG ‘ABN BIIVITV ‘sql ¢ ‘AVY UILBITV "dL 6 [BIW [Lo ‘Sq GY ‘AVY OLRId ‘Sql #8 ‘UlOD ‘Sql 632, ‘udp ‘'SqI [8 ‘ul0D ‘Sql ZS ‘UI0D ‘SQL G6 ‘Wd0,) Soon ‘p 407 ae ol % 407 “E for ‘(GOGL) JST, BYSVAGAN ey} Ur BOTY Yrgy uo uyey Jo punog euO AOF poms) poo 178 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. for bedding, but charged to the steers as though all had been consumed. Not only did stover furnish variety, but it also lessened the tendency to scour on alfalfa. Character of the Stover Used.—The corn from which the stover came was cut and put into shocks just as soon as the ears had thoroughly dented and the husks about them had turned yellow, and yet while many of the leaves below were still green. At this stage, usually about the middle of September in the Northern States, the corn itself is in no wise in- jured by being harvested and there is a great deal of nutriment conserved in the stalk. Corn stover, being a by-product, has a low commercial value, which makes it a very economical food for beef production. Wherever corn is a staple crop, the stalk as well as the ear should be utilized, at least to the extent that the area of corn grown on a farm does not exceed the capacity of the farm for stock feeding. Should soil from which the stalks have been removed blow badly, as in drier sections, some stalks could be left standing between shock rows. Shock Corn for Winter Feeding.—W ith the in- troduction of the modern harvester, which cuts and ties in bundles of convenient size corn in the stalk, called “fodder corn,” the farmer is enabled to put his crop in the shock usually at a cost not to exceed that of putting husked corn in the crib. With the former method, the stalk is put where at least three- fourths of the nutriment it contained at harvesting time is carefully preserved for winter use, and the ear is protected by the husk, within which it keeps fresh and much softer for feeding whole than is ear corn. Two-year-old steers do not find it difficult to crush the ear, grinding husk, cob and corn to- gether, transferring the mixture to the stomach — ee FEEDING RANGE TWO-YEAR-OLDS. 179 where, owing to its bulk, it is easily penetrated by digestive juices. The writer during several years of practical experience in fattening cattle on shock corn has never had cases of founder or undue scouring, so commonly occurring among cattle heavily fed on shelled corn or corn meal. Shock corn is most conveniently fed by scatter- ing the bundles from a loaded wagon anywhere in a field which is to be plowed the following spring or pastured. The bundles need not be broken by cutting the twine. If fed in a yard, racks with vertical slats sufficiently wide apart to give room for the head should be provided. These slats prevent the cattle from pulling out stalks. Supplementing Shock Corn.—While this fodder is often used alone for fattening purposes, its deficiency in protein makes a protein supplement desirable. Excellent results may be secured by feeding half the ration of corn on the stalk, the other half as shelled corn or corn and cob meal in which is mixed a portion—one-fifth of the weight of grain thus fed—of either oil meal, cottonseed meal or gluten meal. If bran can be purchased at a price not to exceed one-half that of the protein foods men- tioned, it can be profitably used in double the quan- tity. With alfalfa or some other protein roughage fed in connection with corn fodder, less commercial protein food is needed. Had the lot fed corn, alfalfa and stover—the most profitable ration in the 1905 Nebraska test—been supplied with corn fodder in- stead of stover, that much husking and shelling would have been saved and the ration would doubt- less have proved still more economical. In feeding shock corn to cattle on full grain feed, inasmuch as there will be consumed approximately two pounds of grain to one of roughage, and the stalk and ear 180 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING, are about equal in weight, not more than one-half the corn should be fed on the stalk unless stock cat- tle can be conveniently turned in later to make use of more of the stalk. It is needless to say that pigs should be kept to pick up all waste corn in the droppings. The profits from cattle feeding often come from the pork as a. by-product. Not more than one pig to a steer will be needed. Snapped corn, which is the unhusked ear broken from the stalk, is most commonly used in Western States, where the stalks instead of being harvested are pastured in the field. Snapped corn is in every way a very Satisfactory food for fattening cattle. It has all the merits of shock corn, being less cumbersome to feed, though with it more hay or other rough feed must be supplied to take the place of stalks. Cattle feeders not infrequently fatten cattle on nothing but snapped corn, depending upon husk and cob to fur- nish the necessary bulk. This is perhaps economical when corn is low in price. Under average market conditions, however, it is more profitable to make a larger use of roughage, and so long as the stalks, well cured, are nourishing and at the same time well relished, it would seem desirable to make use of them. Stalks left uncut in the field lose the larger . part of their nutriment by exposure and by a grad- ual change of starch to the more indigestible crude fiber. While some use is-made of the ‘‘stalk field,” there is little value in the material after winter sets in, more than what is obtained from unhusked nub- bins and the uppermost leaves. Snapped corn is usually fed in ordinary tight bottomed flat bunks. The difficulty connected with the continued use of snapped corn is that of storage, as snapped corn in large piles sometimes heats, through lack of proper air circulation. For fall and early winter snapped corn is a popular Western food. It should be fed with alfalfa, clover or cowpea hay. FEEDING RANGE TWO-YEAR-OLDS. 181 Sore Mouths.—With long continued feeding on heavily eared corn fodder or snapped corn a little soreness of the mouth or gums sometimes occurs, though with shock corn this is much less common than with husked ears, owing to the hardness of the latter. Should any individuals show soreness by a disposition to reject ears after taking them into the mouth, they had better be separated and fed corn meal mixed with bran, or corn and cob meal for a few weeks, or until the soreness disappears. Corn silage, so valuable for dairy cows, is also used for fattening steers, though its liberal use for that purpose is not to be recommended. Ten pounds of silage per day will supply all the bulk and water desirable in a fattening ration. That quantity, no doubt, would prove beneficial because of its cooling and laxative effect upon the system. The economy of using silage for fattening purposes, particularly with fairly mature cattle, is a matter of doubt in the mind of the writer. In the West, where fodder corn is in- expensive, it hardly seems practicable to spend mtch money in its preparation. Silos, cutting machines and labor in preparing corn for silage cost money, more in proportion to the value of the fodder in the West than in the East, where feed is costly and labor on a par with the West. Ifa silo is built for dairy cows it would doubtless be worth while to make use of a small quantity of silage for fattening cattle. Sorghum hay, or cane, has°a feeding value very similar to that of well cured corn stover. A Ne- braska test in 1905, when sorghum hay was compared with prairie hay, both being fed with corn and oil meal, shows sorghum to be worth $4.63 per ton in comparison with prairie hay worth $6. Sorghum hay is of better quality for feeding purposes, if planted rather thickly to make the stems small in size. This 182 PROFITABLE” STOCK FEEDING. fodder deteriorates in quality exceedingly if left exposed to heavy spring rains. Timothy hay, as has been intimated, is not a val- uable plant for cattle feeding, nor can it be profitably fed at average market prices. Its adaptability for horses gives it a price above the reach of the cattle feeder. It is commonly grown with clover to keep the latter from lodging, for which purpose but a small quantity of seed is needed—not more than a pint per acre. Prairie hay, as grown uncultivated on the West- ern plains, has a composition similar to timothy, though its analysis is unsatisfactory, because it con- tains a variety of grasses, giving it a variable com- position. This hay is less expensive than timothy and can be profitably used where prairie land is low in price. Millet is often grown for cattle feeding, usually because it yields a crop quickly and produces a good tonnage of fodder. Cattle feeders, as a rule, are not enthusiastic over millet, because it is very apt to in- duce scours. If grown for feeding purposes it _ should be fed with some other roughage. There is little reason why a cattle feeder should grow a large acreage of millet. Oat straw is sometimes made the sole roughness for fattening cattle, though it means the use of more grain. Oat straw does very well for half the rough- age for fattening cattle when good hay is difficult to secure at moderate prices. Wheat straw has little feeding Sika to Zuntz, the German investigator, no more than is expended in its mastication and partiai digestion. While steers force themselves to eat it when other roughage is not furnished, its value is as a filler rather than as a source of nutriment. It would be much better to buy hay and use wheat straw for — oe “> oY FEEDING RANGE TWO-YEAR-OLDS. 183 bedding than to feed the straw and have insufficient bedding material. Flax straw often contains some of the seed and may be successfully used in feeding operations. It is relished by cattle and seems to have considerable nutritive value, at least more than oat or wheat straw. Beet pulp has recently been tested at the Colo- rado and Utah Stations. In Colorado two-year-old steers ate 123 pounds of pulp in connection with 12.5 pounds of alfalfa, and gained on this 1.57 pounds per day at a cost of $3.79 per hundred pounds of gain. By feeding corn the gain was 2 pounds per day, but the cost was increased to $5.93 per hundred pounds of gain. At the Utah Station there were required 31.4 pounds of pulp and 11.5 pounds of alfalfa for one pound of gain. With alfalfa worth $3.50 per ton and beet pulp 50 cents, the cost of one hundred pounds of gain was only $2.80. Roots are extensively grown in European coun- tries for feeding beef cattle as well as dairy stock. They are always sliced before feeding, which labor of preparation, with the cost of growing and harvest- ing the crop, makes them impracticable for Amer- ican conditions, at least in the corn belt, where any desirable succulence may be furnished more cheaply with corn silage. Ten pounds of roots per day for a fattening steer are unquestionably beneficial, and were it not for the expense, they would doubtless be grown for that purpose. Of the root crops the mangel is most in favor, considering both yield and food value. Feeding Three-year-old Range Steers in Winter. —The method of feeding this class of cattle is so similar to the feeding of two-year-olds that little need be said more than to suggest that older and more mature cattle require a little less protein. 184 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. Where, for example, a two-year-old would make profitable gains on oil meal to the extent of 12 per cent of the grain ration, with corn and prairie or timothy hay, the three-year-old would do well on 8 or 10 per cent. Three-year-old range steers, while requiring more feed for a given gain than younger cattle, are sometimes fed with as much profit, because the advance in selling price over cost price is made on a larger initial weight. Cattle should be sold when they show finish.—It is not profitable to hold cattle after they have suffi- cient finish to make them bring a reasonably good figure on the market. Two-year-old steers, in a 1905 Nebraska test, dropped from an average gain of about 2 pounds per day during the fifth month to less than 1%4 pounds the sixth month, at the end of which time they topped the market. A longer period would have been a disastrous loss. The best period of feeding can not be stated in months. Cattle should be sold when they show suff- cient fat to give fullness in the purse, or scrotum sack, and underneath the throat; when the flank bunches as the animal walks, and there is noticeable over most of the frame a fairly thick covering of flesh. There is often apparent to the eye a padding moving back and forth on the side of the shoulder during locomotion, which serves as an index. These indications, while difficult to describe, become familiar to the feeder after a few years’ experience. Shipment of Cattle—About two days previous to shipment the grain should be reduced one-third and the following day another third, the hay being in- creased correspondingly. By feeding the cattle on hay—preferably prairie or timothy—with little or no grain, there will be much less scouring and a lighter shrinkage. The practice of withholding water from cattle some e FEEDING RANGE TWO-YEAR-OLDS, 185 time before shipment, in order that they may be famishing for drink after they reach the stock yards, thus taking on a heavier “fill,” is a most cruel one. Cattle sometimes reach the chutes too weak to stand, suffering intensely from thirst. Men who treat their stock in this manner have no business owning stock of any description, and if they insist upon shipping, proper laws should be enacted to protect their stock. Fortunately, the packers discount cattle filled as de- scribed, though it takes some men a long time to find it out. Cattle that have water before them up to loading do not ordinarily drink to excess unless driven a long distance on a hot day, when it could be limited, CHAPTER - XVI. CORN SUBSTITUTES) PROVEN CONCH TRATES, ANDTHE PREPARATION sOe FOODS FOR, FALTENING CALPTEER: Kafir corn will stand much drier weather than common corn, for which reason it is more success- fully grown than corn in semiarid regions. At the Kansas Experiment Station, Kafir corn was found to be 6 per cent below corn in feeding value. Owing to the hardness of the seeds, this grain should be ground or soaked before feeding. Sorghum, or cane, will also stand more dry weather than corn, but the seeds are less commonly used for fattening purposes than are the seeds of Kafir corn. The two are similar in composition and nearly equal in feeding value for steers. Barley, when ground, can be used in a steer’s ra- tion, either alone or with corn. The) lattereas preferable. Barley is not so well relished, and is, if anything, a little below corn in feeding value, though the two are similar in composition. Wheat meal was compared with corn meal in a Nebraska test, 1901-02. To make the wheat less sticky, one-fifth bran was used in both lots and later oil meal.. In the comparison, wheat gave 5 per cent larger gains than corn. At the Ohio Station, corn meal alone gave 7 per cent larger gains for food consumed than wheat meal alone. It would seem safe to conclude that they are about equal in value, and whenever wheat can be purchased at corn prices, which seldom happens, it may be fed. Oats, though more bulky than corn, are very use- 186 CORN SUBSTITUTES FOR CATTLE. 187 ful for cattle feeding, especially for young stock. They are less fattening, which, with their bulk, makes them more useful as an adjunct than as a substitute for corn. Their feeding value is no higher, pound for pound, than corn, and they are usually more costly per hundred, which makes them more expensive to feed. Oats, though richer in protein than corn, are hardly to be classed among protein foods. They are a most excellent feed, when the price will permit their use. Commercial Protein Foods.—What has been said concerning supplemental protein foods for dairy cat- tle applies also to fattening cattle. They are all useful, and the matter of choice depends entirely upon current prices, assuming the foods are equal in quality. Cottonseed meal, while richer in protein than oil meal, is perhaps more often infericr in quality. There are not sufficient experimental data on record to warrant one in placing a value above the others upon any one of these conéentrated foods, cotton- seed meal, oil meal, gluten meal or soy bean meal, though the composition indicates an advantage for cottonseed meal. Bran is an excellent food material because of its “corrective” qualities as well as protein content, and is particularly useful as a part of a heavy grain ration. Frequently, however, the price of bran is such as to make it much more costly per hundred weight of protein than the concentrated foods previously mentioned. It would not be safe to give bran a value per ton to exceed one-half that of oil meal or other foods of that class. Shorts are still higher in price than bran and rather too sticky for cattle. Condimental Stock Foods.—These foods are dis- cussed freely in the last chapter on dairy cattle and the 188 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. conclusions are as applicable to fattening cattle. The Iowa Station, after very careful experimentation, found them entirely too costly to be economically used for steer feeding. Grinding grain for fattening cattle undoubtedly saves some feed, though this saving is not ordi- narily great enough to pay for the grinding. At the Kansas Station 8 per cent was saved, which would be considered a good showing, yet this saving would mean but 4% pounds of corn to the bushel—with corn high in price, perhaps enough to pay the grind- ing bill, but not the labor. In the case of sore mouths or when a quick finish is sought, or with cholera too prevalent to make the keeping of pigs for running behind cattle safe, grinding is practicable. The feasibility of grinding, therefore, depends en- tirely upon circumstances, but for Western condi- tions it is not ordinarily profitable to grind corn for cattle. Crushing corn in the husk by means of a machine for that purpose is often practical, because it breaks the ears enough to make mastication easier and at the same time costs but little—with a large crusher from one to two cents per bushel. Crushed corn has all the advantages of snapped corn and corn on the stalk, and it can be fed to smail cattle as well as large. The use of the crusher will with- out a doubt become more general among cattle feeders. Cutting up corn fodder by means of an ensilage cutter is practiced successfully, and such fodder is excellent for cattle too small to feed upon whole ear corn in the stalk. ‘ Shredding corn stover is usually done in connec- tion with husking by machinery. Shredded stover is more completely consumed than unshredded, and _ has a somewhat, higher food value because of its CORN SUBSTITUTES FOR CATTLE, 189 mechanical condition, though its extra value will hardly give remuneration for the labor involved in shredding. If stalks can be shredded at a very slight cost above the expense of getting the corn husked it may pay. It is excellent material for feeding in barns, inasmuch as the waste is very use- ful for bedding stalls, in addition to the fact that shredded stover is more conveniently handled in- side. For outdoor feeding it would be unwise to go to the expense of shredding corn stover for steers two years old or older. The lower third of the corn stalk does not possess a nutritive value equal to the energy expended in “trying” to digest it. To at- tempt to force cattle to clean up these inert stubs is to put upon them unnecessary and unprofitable work. The upper part can be masticated more cheaply by these older cattle than it can be cut up by ma- chinery. : Cutting or chaffing hay and straw is practiced more largely in Europe than in America. The ex- pense of such work is so great in comparison with the original value of the roughage and the added value of the fodder that the practice is unprofitable for Mid- dlewest and Western conditions. Farm animals are equipped for masticating most foods in the crude state, and, thus equipped, they are able to do the necessary mechanical work at less cost than it can be done by purchased power. Some seeds are too small and hard to be fed whole, but fodder plants, as a rule, are more profitably used whole, which will be true.as long as labor is costly and roughage is low in price, Igo PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. Range-cattle Scenes in Western Nebraska. PART IV SHEEP CHAPTER XVIII. Met LON EYP E. Outlook for Sheep Favorable.—There is a grow- ing tendency on the part of the public to consume more mutton. This may be due in part to the fact that mutton carcasses are more carefully dressed and better ripened than formerly, but more likely it is both because a better grade of mutton sheep is being produced and because it is marketed earlier than was the case several years ago. During former years when wool was higher in price, the country was largely stocked with fine-wooled sheep of the distinctively wool breeds. These sheep were retained on the farms perhaps several years for the annual clip of-wool, and when finally placed upon the market had become so aged as to make the meat tough, as well as strongly flavored. With lower prices for wool, there have come about marked changes in the character of flocks. Rams of the mutton breeds, including the Shropshire, South- down, Hampshire, Cotswold, Oxford, Lincoln, and Leicester, have been crossed upon native fine-wooled ewes, resulting in a good quality of mutton stock. These crossbred mutton sheep do not produce so heavy a fleece as do the Merino, and at prevailing prices for wool it is not profitable to carry them over for their second clip and the little increase in weight; but 191 192 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING, their points of excellence for mutton production are so much greater than their deficiencies for wool production in comparison with the Merino, that they are now in greater-favor. Merino ewes of improved strains are still preferred for range con- ditions, because they not only shear a heavier fleece but their dense, fine wool and smaller frames make them better able to withstand the hardships of the range. With the more recent advance in the price of wool, there is now a tendency upon the part of farmers to retain in the breeding ewes somewhat more of the Merino blood, depending upon the heavy mutton rams to produce a type of lamb which has proved very satisfactory in the feed-lot, though somewhat smaller than higher grades of mutton stock. Another favorable sign, for at least the immediate future of the sheep industry, is the fact that the number of sheep in all parts of the world has not kept pace with the increase of population. The de- cline in number is perhaps greatest in Australia, which is largely attributable to the unprecedented drouth in that country. Argentina seems to be the only country showing an increase in the number of sheep. Whereas in 1870 there was one sheep for every inhabitant of the globe, in 1900 there was but one sheep for every two people. Familiarity With the Habits of Sheep Essential to Success.—With present conditions more favor- able for mutton production, it is well worth the while of the farmer or stockman to acquaint himself with the best methods of handling sheep. No farm animal is less understood by the masses, in the West at least, simply because they are handled by what may be termed ‘sheep feeding specialists.” Sheep are different from cattle and swine in their habits and characteristics. A man eminently success- MUTTON TYPE. 193 ful in rearing and fattening either of these classes might easily fail with sheep. At most, the highest success cannot reasonably be expected without first giving the business careful study or without spending several years in gaining experience. The former method is less expensive and brings quicker returns, though some personal experience is an aid to the most carefully instructed. It would not be considered ad visable for an inexperienced sheep raiser, no matte how thoroughly he has posted himself on the ins and outs of the business, to begin on a large scale. He would better enlarge his business as he finds himself capable, because there is so much at stake in conduct- ing large feeding operations that even a slight erru might result in a considerable loss. The Temperament of Sheep.—Sheep are natu rally timid in disposition, and a sudden disturbance of any kind, as the bark of a dog or any sharp noise, will sometimes create @ panic in the entire flock. Sheep, through fright, have been known to crowd together so closely as to cause some to die from smothering. Care should therefore be taken to avoid unnecessary disturbances of any sort which will cause fright, resulting in no little shrinkage on the entire flock, if not mortality. Some _ flock- masters, to avoid startling their sheep, make a prac- tice of whistling or talking to them, as they ap- proach unexpectedly. The Dog Difficulty—The unusual timidity of sheep makes raising them in some localities un- satisfactory because of troublesome dogs. One dog, entering a flock, will start the entire number on a run across the field, and, if the chase is continued, several will die from exhaustion and others will shrink badly in weight. Dogs not uncommonly en- ter fields during the night and run down sheep, tearing the skin with their teeth—perhaps killing 194 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. several—simply for the pleasure of doing something ~- vicious. Some states have laws which provide a tax upon all dogs owned in a township, the fund accruing therefrom being used to pay sheep-killing losses, when the owner of the dog is not known or does not have sufficient means to make good the loss. Where it is not practicable to keep a night- watch for dogs, the simplest remedy is to attach a string to a piece of fresh meat and drag it across the field, leaving it at the end of the trail charged with a good dose of some deadly poison, strychnine being most effective. Strange dogs entering the field will immediately scent the fresh meat, and following the trail, will soon get the poison, which invariably has the intended effect.. During the practice of such a method, any valuable dogs belonging to the owner of the sheep must, of course, be tied up. Billy-goats do not ordinarily run from dogs, and one or two are sometimes kept in a flock of sheep to prevent losses. Where the goats can be taught to stay with the flock, this method often succeeds, although it may be neces- sary to rear the young goats with the sheep to teach them to remain with the flock at all times, that they may be present when protection is needed. Sheep and goats do not interbreed. Coyotes and Wolves.—In parts of the West, coyotes and wolves give the same trouble, and some such method as has been suggested for dogs must be practiced with them. A number of bells of consider- able size and volume attached by neck straps to the strongest sheep have proved successful in keeping coyotes away, and they have sometimes proved ef- fective with dogs. Mutton Type.—In the profitable production of mutton, type is a factor, as in beef production, though the markets do not discriminate so closely between types of sheep as between types of cattle, MUTTON TYPE, 195 relatively more importance being given to condition, or fatness, in sheep. The covering of wool makes it difficult for a buyer to judge conformation accu- rately without handling, which would be a tedious process with a large number of sheep. From the butcher's point of view, the fat sheep should resem- ble in a general way the form of a fat steer. There should be breadth of back and loin and thickness of covering over these parts. The hind quarter of the sheep, including the rump and thighs, called the leg of mutton, is one of the highest priced cuts in the carcass, higher proportionately than the same cut in the beef carcass, for which reason it is espe- cially important that sheep should have full, wide rumps and full, deep thighs. Broad and deep chests and large heart girths are equally as important in sheep as in cattle, inasmuch as fullness in that region means greater conctitutional vigor and greater gaining capacity. Ewes and Lambs in Pasture. 196 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. The following score-card suggested by Craig for mutton sheep is in use among agricultural colleges. The relative importance of different parts is shown by the numerical values assigned to each: Scale of Points for Mutton Sheep—Wether: Perfect Score. General appearance: Weight, ratcording LoLage oe. 2s. engievseera cee « eesleeee atete 8 Form, long, low, symmetrical, compact................ 5 Quality, clean bone, silky hair, fine skin, yielding large percentage: (0b- Ment. 252 ai onesie eee osteo ee Condition, deep, even covering of firm flesh, especially in repions, Of. waluable: Cats son. 3. tee he. aecn een eee 8 Head and neck: Muzzle, fine; mouth large; lips thin; nostrils large...... 1 Hyes sebricht> full ss ecceyccrets 5h easinss cute, Foros ceil aoereeeenere 1 Hacesshort, cleanweut, features cee aeeiret iui clsloiseieenene i BIOrGHeAads ML OAG! Ser cwitevele oc! aie oveders oesterc senators sie penokovere cieperereas it JOP byssus Guieteh Sain coda sbOnO Hom nos od GonD GoD DUS Ose it INGOR, aes, EINE Shao oon coco donsmaodanndodoDSo COONS . Forequarters : Shoulder vein culls yoeviclereiereuci erate om tei einen iL Shoulders, covered, compact ee «2: ~ 0 = ie teas See eee 1 Chesterwad er ede pineyinc.-eusteaneeersie kerio iereriiereelen ater 2 Brisket, projecting forward; breast wide.............- 1 Legs, straight, short, wide apart, strong; forearm full; Shank” sMOOth:- cis o%, sc sreisyetleejereic’s erties oh ik eee 2 Body: Back, straight, long, wide; ribs arched................ 10 Thoin, thick, “broad Along. j.rna< ies ers)sts tee waste as 10 Flank, low, thick, making underline straight............ 2 Hindquarters: Hips far apart. cs o0 bier clemieertirle trent tena tete 1 Rump; long; Wevel, *widen ce sien wes aye ofa srettelecave (sents keene 4 Ai nelrcealll Pee ooacucouooconCh ace den bocctddedejor 4 Ewist. plimp,, .Ceepis re cies a1 e ermieteun aeons ter te setere ete wie ort + Legs, straight, short, strong; shank smooth............ 2 Constitution : Girth, larg6 5. fore, favik> follies ies ol stress oh cote eee 3 Skin, “pink! ‘color % tains bchlels cate eed a ee 2 Fleece, dense and even over body; yolk abundant....... 4 Wool: Quantity; long, dense, EVEN... 06:2 PSF |** ‘ures, Jo punod asad powmsiod ure Le'T Po) e8o Ea Oe be C8 AE Oe ee TBE, onpetbale er ‘* £ep asd poumsuoa LeEp 90'T LZoT Get |00°'T 98° 192° 924° |80T’ 06 Gg ttt tts Kep sed paumsaoo urery gz" Ze" 12° re" 0z° ae" eo" 02° FS 6° © ja((O: Clever eel eouewere eee) cious) nisi chaise ures Apreq T1862 €°F6 “68 | “S8 GL} = “BL GL) “89 99 PO)" * "ets asofo ON} 48 7M OSerIOAW £6'8S 69 "69 | SEG FCS) Sh OR] _ Lh [88 +++ Burmurdeq on) ye “ym oSeroAY > oe on | ab 4 O2> Cas!| o> & . gai | SE ba | 5S 22 | FER "Ge |p23 na8 FE toe ae eile eet ee | eae ie ek ewe ie Be “Bo : B act ae eb mie een en ies male —sjo, 4q suoryey n= E £1972 asi |Pes Pas BA | is ee se - i ca Gi + 5 a ‘TL Upe[ng ‘99 Uo] Ng ‘LE UeT[Ng ~ ‘BL Urol ng VYSVUAAUNS | VMSVUYAANE] “ONTIVOAME “AV IDs | CHAPTER XXIII. PARASITES IN SHEEP. It is the history of sheep husbandry everywhere within moist latitudes that evil days befall the flock because of infection from internal parasites. These parasites, living within the digestive tract of the sheep, are expelled when mature and filled with eggs. The germs are thus communicated to the grass and are taken in by the lambs and young - sheep, which become in turn infected. The older sheep may have harbored these parasites without | noticeable injury to themselves, but the lambs suf- fer much more and very often succumb and die. Thousands of flocks all through the corn belt have been started with high hopes, have thriven for a time, then have become diseased, the owners dis- couraged and the sheep dispersed. This is not necessary. Parasitic diseases are hard to cure but comparatively easy to prevent. A brief study of the nature of the more important parasites likely to affect sheep will be helpful. The stomach-worm, Strongylus contortus, is a small hair-like worm that inhabits the fourth stomach of sheep and lambs. It may readily be found there, just at the beginning of the intestine, sometimes in small numbers and sometimes in multitudes. These little worms do great damage. They cause the diseases called “paper skin,” “black scours,” and in the West lambs so afflicted are called “locoed.” The presence of a few of these worms may not create great harm, again a com- 248 PARASITES IN SHEEP. 249 paratively small number of them will cause the death of the lamb. In the. older sheep they are not so noticeable. Very often a lot of lambs re- ceived in the feed lot are found to be afflicted with scours that cannot be attributed to wrong feed- ing. When this is the case the owner should at once dissect one of the lambs, searching for this worm, which, if found in force, will explain his trouble. The remedy is a treatment of gasoline, given after fasting for at least sixteen hours, the dose for a lamb six months old being three tea- spoonfuls in a quarter of a glass of sweet milk, well shaken together. The lambs should be treated three times in succession, twenty-four hours apart. Creo- sote is also advised, and there are other remedies, which we will not at present concern ourselves with, the object being to seek the cause and prevention, a far more profitable act. It must be borne in mind that the germs of in- fection are carried over winter in the bodies of the ewes. When warm weather comes the germs are then laid upon the ground and through the medium of short, tender grass they find access to the lambs. In dry regions they reach the lambs through stag- nant drinking pools. Through this source come the “loco” and “Lombriz’ of New Mexico, Texas and the dry range country. When lambs are born early, say in March, and with their mothers are well nourished until grass comes in spring, they will soon be ready to wean, ‘when they may be separated from the ewes and put on fresh pasture, with no old sheep with them. Clean lambs on clean pasture will never become infected and will remain clean and profitable. Before the lambs are weaned the ewes may be shifted often from‘one pasture to another and the drinking water furnished in troughs or other un- - 250 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. contaminated source. This lessens the liability of infection. Ewes and lambs may be kept until weaning time on sowed pastures of rye, oats, barley or rape, or a mixture of these. There is little liability to in- fection from grazing these coarser sowed crops, as the lambs hardly bite so close to the ground. In this case, however, small grassy lots much fre- quented by the flock must be avoided, as they are poison spots to young lambs. It should be the steadfast aim of the shepherd to avoid having the lambs graze after their moth- ers, and as soon as they are weaned they must be removed to fresh ground, where old sheep have not grazed that year. It is not probable that infection remains over winter in northern latitudes in the | pasture, To lessen the danger of lambs becoming dis- eased, it is a safe and profitable plan to hasten their maturity with corn fed while the lambs are yet sucking their mothers. Thus in June a whole flock of lambs may be made to average a weight of eighty pounds, when they will command a good price and may as well be sent to market. Then there is no danger during the summer period for these lambs. Of course, the shepherd desires to retain his best ewe lambs to add to the flock, and they must be cared for as indicated, separated from their mothers and grazed on safe pasture. To breed ewes before they are sixteen or eighteen months old is to invite the gathering of parasites, as it weakens the resisting power of the young ewes and makes them the more ready host for the destroying worms. 2 The nodular disease of the intestines is almost as serious a plague as the stomach-worm. It is a disease generally of slow progression, and, unlike PARASITES IN SHEEP. 251 the stomach-worm, is hard, if not impossible, to -reach with medicine. The nodular disease causes little tumors upon the intestines, commonly called “knotty guts,” which unfit the intestines for sausage casings. Unfortunately this is the least of the harm that they do. The digestion and as- similation is seriously affected, the sheep eats ravenously but gets thin and in the end dies. For- tunately it is not so swift or rapidly spread as the work of the stomach-worm. Seeing that medicine can do little or nothing for the nodular disease, the course is one of pre- vention, and measures should include the method of pasturing just outlined to prevent the increase of stomach-worms and the sale of infected sheep or those suspected of being unhealthy. It is a safe rule to permit no sheep to remain upon the,farm that has a cough, that is drooping, has a dead, thriftless wool, or that persists in re- maining in thin flesh. Naturally the best ewes will become thin when suckling their lambs, but if they are in health they should soon recover if afterward they have sufficient food. It used to be supposed that Merino sheep were less subject to internal parasites than sheep of the mutton; breeds: . Pits! 4s not. true. Sometimes Merinos seem of tougher fiber and live longer than other breeds when infected, but they are unprofit- able unless in health. The long wools—Lincolns, Leicesters and Cotswolds—seem less resistant than Shropshires, Southdowns and Dorsets. Oxford Downs seem readily infested. Whatever breed is kept, the management should be the same, as no sheep is profitable when diseased. After saying so much upon this question of para- sites some may be deterred from undertaking to keep sheep at all. This would be unwise. Fore- 252 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING, | warned, no one need suffer from the pests. On a small farm in Ohio, a State peculiarly subject to - parasitic infection, Mr. Joseph E. Wing has for fourteen years kept a flock of Dorset ewes. The flock is small, about 150 all told, but it is kept on a rather limited area of land. In the early ’go’s para- | sites made sad havoc in this flock. In 1896 nearly all the lambs died. Since then, by better manage- ment, the plague of parasites has almost disap- peared, and the profit of the flock much increased. — These sheep have been kept each year on the same land, but not continuously. PART V SWINE CHAPTER XXIV. PE ESO HOGS. Swine Husbandry Extensive—-No animal has yielded more revenue to the average American farmer than the hog. The favor shown this ani- mal is not because. he possesses more attractive qualities than are found in other farm animals, but rather for more practical reasons which appeal to the masses who till the soil. (1) The feeding of swine requires less capital than the feeding of other domestic animals. A small sum invested in brood sows will, in a year’s time, return many fold to the purchaser, which makes swine husbandry possible on practically all farms, whether large or small, or whether operated by owner or renter. (2) A large number of hogs may be kept within a compara- tively small space, requiring less fencing than is necessary for other farm animals. (3) Hogs are easily fed and handled. (4) They are the farm’s scavengers, consuming kitchen waste and other refuse which nothing else will consume, material which, were it not for the hog, would be wasted. For these, and perhaps still other reasons, the hog is found more widely distributed over the farming districts than any other class of animals. 253 254 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING, Photo by Breeder’s Gazette Lard Type—An English Champion Berkshire Boar. Photo by Breeder’s Gazette Racon Type—An English Champion Tamworth Boar. a TYPES OF HOGS. 255 The Improved Breeds of Swine may be divided into two classes or types, the Lard, or fat type, and the Bacon type. The lard class includes the Berk- shire, Poland-China, Duroc-Jersey, Chester White, and a few other breeds less common in America. All hogs of the lard type are so called because of their inherent tendency, when heavily fed, to store in their carcasses a large proportion of fat. The Conformation of the Lard, or Fat, Hog.— The ideal lard hog should be broad and deep in body, supported by strong, well-placed legs and feet. As with the beef steer, the fat hog has its high-priced meat along the back, loin and hams. The hog differs from the steer in that a relatively higher valuation is placed upon the ham, or what corresponds to the thigh of the steer. The side _meat on the hog is also valuable because it is used for bacon. Too much length of body is objection- ble, because it means somewhat later maturity, with consequent slower fattening proclivities. A long body is also more likely to give to the animal a drooping back, whereas a slight arching is really wanted. On the other hand, too much compactness of body may dwarf the growth of the animal, which is especially true when there is over-refinement of bone. There is, then, danger of having the body too short as well as too long. The following score-card, suggested by Craig, gives a detailed description of the ideal fat barrow and the relative importance of the various parts of the animal: SCALE OF POINTS FOR FAT HOGS—BARROW. Perfect General Appearance: . score. Weitpht, store acearding to age... 6525.4 sce c en ne wen 6 Form, deep, broad, low, symmetrical, compact, standing — BEAMS by EW MEEA WE fatel crete ine haha aie aisle . ease cto, 4 su 10 260 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. Hindquarters: Hips, smooth, wide, proportionate to rest of body...... 2 Rump, long, even, straight, rounded towards tail...... Bie oe Ham, ' firm, ‘fleshed (deep, rounded oi22 5.1. vcs sho) ee 6 Thigh; fleshed low: towards: Hock; .tig- «.uy< sepa piete cela 2 Legs, properly set, short, strong; feet medium size.... 2 Digestive Capacity of Swine——No farm animal can manufacture so much meat from a given quan- tity of food as the pig, provided the material con-— sumed is in a more or less concentrated form. For the utilization of a ration consisting largely of bulky matter the pig is by nature unadapted. Such rations are more economically converted into beef or mutton. Whereas cattle and sheep have four stomachs, the total capacity of which is large, pigs have but one, and that very limited in size. To be more specific, a car-load of sheep or cattle of a certain weight have a combined stomach and in- testinal capacity nearly three times as great as a car-load of hogs of the same weight. This larger digestive capacity of the ruminants makes them better adapted for consuming coarse fodders, but it gives them no advantage over the pig for grain feeding. On the contrary, from the same weight of grain, fully one-third less meat will be made by cattle and sheep than by pigs. The pig shouid, therefore, be used to utilize refuse from the kitchen and dairy, concentrated foodstuffs like the cereals, with such bulky matter as can easily be handled— necessarily a limited amount, CHAPTER XXV. ' THE BREEDING HERD OF SWINE. Breeding Combined With Feeding.—Unlike the cattle business, in which it is customary to pro- duce large numbers in cheap grazing sections, to be transported later to the farming districts for feeding purposes, the pork industry must be begun and finished on the farm. The pig feeder must breed and grow the stock he fattens for market, as the dangers from cholera are too great to make the buying of stock pigs in the open market prac- ticable. Then, too, a breeding herd can be main- tained on every farm without seriously interfering with market feeding operations, assuming that this is to be the farm specialty. Unlike cattle and sheep, hogs are very prolific, making it possible to produce from a comparatively small breeding herd all that can be fed. A Good Brood Sow.—Aside from the qualities already discussed in Chapter XXIV on types, the brood sow should have qualities which will make her a satisfactory breeder. The ideal brood sow is one which has the conformation to make a good carcass for the block; one which will respond well to feeding, a matter of inherent vigor and health; and one which will reproduce her kind in paying numbers and care for them well. While some pre- fer one breed to another, each of which has its merits, the desirability of feeding-animals is largely a question of type and individuality. The farmer should have good animals, whether Berkshire, Po- 265 262 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. land-China, Duroc-Jersey, Chester White, Tam- worth, Yorkshire, or crosses of these. Winter Quarters for Brood Sows.—In providing suitable buildings for the brood sows, it is first important to select for a site dry, well-drained ground, preferably on the south side of a grove or other protection from the winter winds. While hogs are fond of wet ground in midsummer, such a place would not be suitable during colder weather, because mud on the skin of the animal reduces its temperature, the water absorbing heat as it evaporates. Hog houses, as built, vary from the small portable kind called “cots,” large enough for from one to four sows, to expensive structures with all possible conveniences. For registered herds of choice stock, these costly buildings are probably good investments, but for raising com- mon market hogs, there is apt to be too large an expenditure for the extra revenue which may come from having such quarters. The Portable House.—Where the ground is well drained the small movable house is satisfactory. Such a house is constructed on runner sills, so that a team hitched to one end can draw it to another place whenever necessary for the sake of cleanli- ness, or when it is desired to change pasture lots. Matched iumber should be used in the construc- tion of these houses to give proper protection dur- ing the winter months and during the farrowing season. On the next page is a photograph of a movable house in use at the Nebraska Station. The house is 9 feet long, 6 feet wide and 3% feet to eaves. The longer roof measures 5 feet 4 inches from peak to lower edge, while the shorter mea- sures 3 feet 3 inches. A small glass window is placed in one end and a swinging door in the other. During warm weather this door may be fastened THE BREEDING HERD OF SWINE. 263 open, while during cold weather it is left down, being hung in such a way that the pigs can push it open when they wish to go in or out, after which it closes by its own weight. The trap doors in the shorter roof may be left open on pleasant days in winter to let in the sun’s rays. During hot weather there would be a decided advantage in having a second roof to place about six inches Small Portable Hog House. above the first to permit a free circulation of air be- tween the two roofs. The air, acting as a noncon- ductor of heat, makes the house much cooler than does the single roof. These houses have no floors, making it necessary to keep them well bedded in cold weather. A floor would be an improvement for early spring farrowing, when the ground is cold, as there is danger of having too much bed- ding for the safety of pigs just farrowed. To pre- vent the sow from lying upon her pigs, a plank or scantling is fastened to the inner sides of the 264 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. house, eight or nine inches from the ground, pro- jecting ten inches toward the center of the building. This prevents the sow from crushing the pigs against the side wall when she lies down. The runner sills extend in front a distance of 2 feet and 10 inches and are sawed to give an upward turn. A plank is bolted from one projecting sill to the other. To this the team is attached when the house is to be moved. By the use of the small, movable house a brood sow can be conveniently kept by herself, which is unquestionably desirable, both at farrowing time and afterwards, since pigs of the same age, or nearly so, do better together than do those widely different in age and size. It is need- less to say that a place for stone grain should be conveniently near all feeding lots. Large houses which can be divided into pens are more satisfactory on ground that is not per- fectly drained, because floors can be built off the ground. During bad weather, too, the feeding may be done under cover. Such a building. would be preferable for early litters. Pigs require warmer housing than other farm animals, because, first, they have but a light coat of hair, and, secondly, they are small in size, presenting a large surface in proportion to weight, thus losing more heat by ra- diation. All lumber should be matched, the roof made tight, and glass windows should be made to fit well to prevent drafts. The floors should be made of planks, especially the floors under sleep- ing quarters. Cement is not satisfactory, except for the alleyway and feeding apartments, because it is a good conductor of heat. Pigs lying on such floors are certain to be uncomfortable in winter, as the cold is conducted from below direct to the animal, unless a thick layer of straw is kept be- neath at all times, or a plank panel, called an over- THE BREEDING HERD OF SWINE. 2605 lay, is placed on the cement floor to give a warm contact. Feed for the Brood Sow Before Farrowing.—In feeding a brood sow before farrowing time, it must be borne in mind that not only the sow must be maintained, but the young she carries must be nourished in such a way that they will be strong and vigorous at birth. Much depends upon the sow’s ration. If she is fed heavily on starchy food, too much internal fat is formed, the presence of which is detrimental to young im utero. There are no dangers from overfeeding, however, if the feed is of the right character. Sows are too often underfed. There are three principal things to con- sider in feeding the brood sow: first, to provide the nutrients—starch, protein, etc.—in proper pro. portions, or as nearly so as possible; secondly, to furnish sufficient bulk to keep the system in a healthy condition; and, thirdly, to make such a ration as inexpensive as possible. The brood sow needs considerable protein, be- cause it is largely concerned in the development of her young. If it is a young sow, not yet mature, still more is needed, because she is building tissues for her own body as well as for her young. Since it is not desired to crowd the brood sow for large gains as in the case of the fattening animal, it is bet- ter for her, and more economical for the breeder, to provide considerable bulky feed. If there is kitchen waste the brood sow should have it. Skim milk is another very useful adjunct. Assuming that these are not available, or that they can be had only in limited quantity, substitutes must be supplied. Whatever starchy matter she needs can be sup- plied most cheaply with corn, at least in the so- called corn belt. In the more Northern latitudes, where barley is more successfully grown than 266 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. corn, this cereal, although less satisfactory, could be substituted for corn. If the entire ration for a young sow is half corn or barley, say 2 per cent of her live. weight, or 4 pounds per day for a 200- pound sow, she could derive whatever more nour- ishment is needed from a more bulky and less ex- pensive material. This should be a nitrogenous roughness, as clover or alfalfa, either of which . will supply the necessary protein at a price much below what it would cost in some protein concen- trate, as wheat shorts, or the more concentrated oil meal. At the North Platte (Nebraska) Substa- tion, mature sows, carrying young, maintained fair thrift on corn fed in a quantity equivalent to I per cent of live weight, with alfalfa pasture. Alfalfa or clover may be fed as hay during the winter or as pasture in summer. In the former case there will be less waste if the hay is first run through a cutting machine. This cut hay may be mixed with corn meal, and enough water added to make a thick slop; or, if corn is fed on the cob, the hay may be fed separately and uncut. In a sec- tion of the country where feed is relatively cheap, it is doubtful if enough better results can be se- cured to pay for cutting the hay and grinding the corn. While some feeders throw the uncut hay upon the ground, it is cleaned up much better if racks are built, so that the sows can eat the hay from below without throwing it under foot. For winter feeding the last cutting of alfalfa is prefer- able for hogs, because that cutting usually has a smaller stem and more leaves, and the same is true of clover. The chaff of either hay plant is better than hay, if it can be obtained in sufficient quan- tity from such places as the floor of the cattle barn, where it usually accumulates during winter feeding. THE BREEDING HERD OF SWINE. 267 Should one not have clover or alfalfa hay, it will be necessary to supply either wheat shorts, bran, oil meal, gluten meal or tankage with the corn. If skim milk can be had, this, fed with corn in the proportion of I pound of corn to 3 pounds of skim milk, will be entirely satisfactory. At ordinary prices the dry brood sow should be fed about 1 pound of shorts or bran to 3 pounds of corn; or 1 pound of gluten, oil meal, or tankage to 8 pounds of corn. Whichever of the several foods is purchased will depend largely upon the relative cost of the protein, which cost can be determined by dividing the price per hundred by the number of pounds of digestible protein in 100 pounds of food, as given in the table in the appendix. The ration for a dry brood sow could be made one-half oats and one-half corn, if the oats are to be had at corn prices by the hundred. In the South, where soy beans and cow peas are grown, there will be required about I pound of soy bean meal to 8 of corn, and 1 pound of cowpeas to 5 of corn. Northern field peas could be substituted for cow- peas. By supplementing corn or bacley with a protein food in any of the ways described, the sow can be brought up to a fair condition of flesh without in- juring her as a breeder. By virtue of her flesh at farrowing time she will need less crowding with grain while suckling her pigs than if she were to farrow spare in flesh. The pigs will also be strong and thrifty at birth. Feed for the Brood Sow After Farrowing.—Dur- ing the first twenty-four hours after farrowing, while the sow is in a very feverish condition, she will show little, if any, inclination for feed. Water slightly warmed should be supplied liberally. A thin bran mash is relished before the sow regains 268 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. her appetite for heavy feed, as is also skim milk. On the second day a slop of wheat shorts with bran may be fed, or, if these are not on hand, four pounds of corn may be mixed with one pound of oil meal and a small quantity fed. Oil meal has a laxative effect, which is desirable for the fresh sow. A mixture of two pounds of corn with one of shorts or bran, depending upon prices, may be fed in increasing amounts until the sow is eating a full feed, which should require fully one month’s time to avoid scours or thumps in the pigs. A day’s ration would then be about 4% per cent of the live weight of a’ growing sow, and about 4 per cent of the weight of a mature sow in average condition. This heavier ration might consist of six pounds of corn to one pound of oil. meal or gluten -meal,- as. these ioods are often cheaper than shorts or bran. With sufficient skim milk, four or five pounds to one of corn may be fed, in which case nothing else is needed. Man- gel-wurzels or other roots are excellent for sows not on pasture, because succulent feed promotes a good flow of milk. Alfalfa hay at average prices is the most economical of all, and may be fed as soon as the sow has fully recovered from the effects of farrowing. Not less than 75 per cent by weight of her full ration should consist of corn, with the remaining 25 per cent hay, which amount will fur- nish nearly all the protein needed. Should the hay be short and fine or in the form of chaff, 70 per cent of corn would keep her in good thrift. When receiving uncut hay, a young sow should have 3 per cent of her live weight in pounds of corn and all the hay she will eat. The Brood Sow on Pasture.—During the sum- mer months less corn will be required on alfalfa. or clover pasture than on hay. Half of a full feed THE BREEDING HERD OF SWINE. 269 of corn, or about 2 per cent of the sow’s live weight, with all the pasture she wants is a cheap and adequate ration. Care should be taken not to overpasture, both for the sake of the sow and the field of alfalfa. It is always best to provide a good run, cutting first one-half the field for hay, and when this has grown up, the other half; or the sows may be turned from one field into another, the second not to be cut until the first is again well started. Rape, though perhaps not so well relished as al- falfa, is better than blue grass and makes a good pasture for sows. It is well to feed with blue grass a little more corn than with rape or alfalfa, be- cause less pasture will be consumed. With wheat, rye, or sorghum pastures, protein foods must be given with corn, which is one reason why none of these pastures are as satisfactory as alfalfa, clover, or rape. With sows fed as outlined from the time of far- rowing, there will be little danger of the pigs being troubled with “thumps,” a disease brought on by overfeeding the sow early in lactation, on grains of a heavy character, at the same time depriving the pigs of needed exercise. Feeding Dry Sows Which Have Not Been Bred. —A sow suckling a good-sized litter, no matter how liberally she may be fed, is almost certain to shrink in weight, which loss, however, may be recovered after the pigs are weaned. Dry sows from which the pigs have just been weaned do well on good alfalfa pasture without grain. At the North Platte (Nebraska) Substation, sows weighing 200 pounds each, gained .43 pound per day for 63 days on alfalfa pasture with no grain. In this connection it must be stated that the pasture was good and the sows were thin in flesh at the time the pigs were 270 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. weaned. At the Michigan Station, “five dry sows were turned on June grass May 27, 1904, rape July g, June grass again July 25, and returned to rape August 6, where they remained till September 9, in all covering a period of 105 days. No grain or supplementary feed of any sort was given during the entire period, though the sows had access to water and shade. During these 105 days there was an increase of two pounds in the weight of the bunch.” The individual record of each sow is shown by the following: WEIGHTS OF FIVE DRY SOWS DURING TEST OF 105 DAYS. Weight Weight Weight Weight Weight Gain May 27, July 9, July 25, Aug.6, Sept.9. or 1904. 1904. 1904. 1904. 1904. — loss. Poland China .... 298 283 281 183 291.5 —6.5 Old Tamworth ... 366 358 359 31513) 379.5 +13.5 Poland China No. 1 194 180 oem alo 180 —14 Poland China No. 2 159 ilFAl 163 INET 174 +15 Poland China No. 3 170 163 155 157.5 164 —6 Here was an average daily loss of .42 pound per sow on blue grass, and an average daily gain of .47 pound per sow on rape. However, a part of the shrinkage on grass was thought to have been due to the shortness and dryness of the grass early in July. Feed for Pigs Before Weaning.—Young pigs show an inclination to eat from the trough when only two or three weeks old, and if the litter is large it is advisable to supply them with food early. Nothing is superior to skim milk mixed with wheat shorts to form a thin porridge. Such feed is easily digested and is rich in bone and muscle making material, and just what the young pigs need. It is, of course, necessary to provide a separate trough for the pigs, around which is built a fence, with the lower board close enough to THE BREEDING HERD OF SWINE. 271 the ground to keep out the mature hogs, yet high enough to allow the pigs to go beneath. At the age of four weeks it is well to add a little corn meal or soaked shelled corn to the ration, until, by the time the pigs are old enough to wean, they are being given a mixture consisting of equal parts of corn and shorts. Some farmers make a practice of weaning at the age of seven weeks, but if the sow raises only one litter per year the age of ten or twelve weeks is preferable. From results obtained at the Wisconsin Experiment Station, it would seem that the gains on young pigs are made as eco- nomically by feeding a given weight of food through the dam as by feeding directly to the pigs. The advantage in depending more upon the sow for the nourishment of the pigs is the fact that the sow is able to consume proportionately more inexpen- sive green forage than are the pigs. If, as some- times happens, certain pigs in the litter are con- siderably larger than others, it is well to wean these stronger pigs first, inasmuch as this will tend to make the entire litter more even in size, and it will also be a more gradual way of drying off the sow. The herd boar, during the season when not in use, should be given practically the same food as suggested for the brood sow before farrowing. If he is mature, he will need but very little, if any, grain, provided he has an abundance of good pas- ture. He should be given pasture, not alone for the sake of economy, but also for exercise—to pro- mote muscular development, stamina and. vigor, so essential in a breeding’ sire. With any of the legumes or rape for pasture, what little grain is given him may consist of corn alone or mixed with barley, rye or any other grain no more costly than corn. A boar should be fed a little protein food, 272 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. as shorts, oil meal or tankage, with corn when no pasture is supplied, and proportionately more of such foods if he is young and undeveloped, al- though perhaps not to exceed 15 per cent of oil meal. While it is not necessary to keep the herd boar in high condition throughout the entire year, as the breeding season approaches his grain ration should be increased, in order to have him in good thrift and fairly fleshy when used in the herd. As mentioned in the chapter on breeding sheep, the number of offspring is likely to be greater, if both sire and dam are gaining rather than losing in flesh at the time of mating. It is also true that the propensity of the offspring to put on flesh is greater, if the parents are in good condition during the breeding season. Flesh on one boar can be made with less expense than on several sows. He should not, however, be fed excessively on corn, nor put in such high condition as will make him unsatisfactory as a breeding sire. Duroc-Jersey Brood Sow and Pigs. CHAPTER XXVI. FATTENING PIGS IN THE FALL. Summer Feeding Profitable—Pigs farrowed in the spring as early as the weather will permit are most profitable under average conditions, because they can be finished for market in the fall. Sum- mer and fall feeding is profitable for two reasons: (1) pigs have but a light coat of hair for protec- tion, which makes them very susceptible to cold weather; (2) pasture can be had in summer, which lessens materially the cost of producing pork. Both cattle and sheep have better natural protec- tion against cold than have pigs, but are less able to stand hot summer weather, especially when pigs are provided with a shaded wallow. After several years of experimentation, the writer does not hesi- tate to say that there is no way in which pork can be made at less expense than with grain on pasture, provided the grain and pasture are of the right kind. No matter how perfectly balanced a ration without pasture may be, from one-fifth to one-third less grain will be required for a given gain if good pasture is supplied. At the Nebraska Ex- periment Station, pork which was worth on the market $5 per hundred, live weight, was made at a cost of $2.43 per hundred with corn and alfalfa pasture, the corn being worth at the time 30 cents per bushel and the alfalfa pasture $5 per acre. At another time, when corn was worth 56 cents per bushel, gains were made at a cost of $4.13 per hun- dred, at which time live pork was worth on the mar- ket $7.50 per hundred. - 273 274 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. Feeding Pigs When First Weaned.—When pigs are first weaned, some time in May or early June, they are hardly large enough to derive all their protein from forage crops. Young pigs need more protein than older pigs, because they are growing rather than fattening. They should be given either alfalfa, clover or rape pasture, and with such feed the grain may be more largely corn than with pas- ture less rich in protein. For rapid gains in pigs nothing is superior to corn meal and skim milk. Enough of the latter should be used to make a slop thin enough to distribute itself quickly in. the trough. Without skim milk, a slop containing two pounds of corn meal and one pound of wheat shorts gives excellent results on pasture. If shorts are high in price, one pound of dried: qblood may be mixed with nine pounds of corn meal; or one pound of oil meal or soy bean meal, with five pounds of corn meal. Oil meal, however, some- times induces scours in pigs, and for that reason is less satisfactory than dried blood. Dried blood is also preferable to tankage for young pigs, be- cause the latter contains some animal fat, which is difficult for them to digest and is very likely to cause scours. In feeding any of these mixtures, there should be given all that will be cleaned up quickly twice per day. This will be about three- fourths of what they would consume without pas- ture. Feeding Shoats.—As the pigs grow larger, the proportion of corn may gradually be increased. After a weight of 75 to 100 pounds has been reached, it would be most economical to feed corn alone with pasture, unless corn is high in price and supplementary foods low. In a Nebraska experi- ment somewhat larger gains were secured by sup- plementing corn on alfalfa, but the cost of gains was less on corn and alfalfa without a supple- FATTENING PIGS IN THE FALL. 275 ment. The same thing was shown at the South Dakota Station, where barley and rape pasture gave somewhat smaller, but cheaper gains, than barley supplemented with tankage, dried blood, oil meal or skim milk. lf one does not have corn for feed- ing pigs on pasture, either barley or wheat or rye may be fed in the same way. In feeding any of these grains on pasture they should be ground or soaked, with the possible exception of corn, which may be fed on the cob or shelled. Still, in warm weather it is not inconvenient to soak corn, and when treated in this way it is enough better to pay well for the trouble, and soaking is much less ex- pensive than grinding. Rape and clover are both good pasture plants for pigs. Experiments at Wisconsin indicate that rape is superior to clover. The field peas of the North, if pastured when the peas are just large enough to cook, undoubtedly give the most rapid growth of all forage plants, with the possible exception of soy beans, and less grain will be required, at least while the peas last. With green field peas a half feed of clear corn meal is best for trough feeding, although a good growth can be made without supplying any grain in addition. Cheaper gains, however, are ob- tained if the peas are supplemented with corn. The disadvantage in growing field peas for pigs is the expense of the seed and the labor of putting in the crop annually. Of the different forage plants, alfalfa is most satisfactory for hogs, first, because it can be made a permanent pasture; secondly, be- cause it is richest in protein, making an excellent combination with corn; and, thirdly, because it has tender leaves and a small stem, which make it easily masticated, besides being greatly relished. In feeding alfalfa care should be taken not to over- pasture. It is best to run the pigs in a field that can be mowed, holding in reserve another to pas- 276 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. ture while the freshly mown field is getting a new start, as was suggested for brood sows. Pigs which show an inclination to root in the sod should be rung. In pasturing forage crops, portable fences may be built and moved about from one season to another. For alfalfa, woven wire is desirable, since, with a crop that does not need reseeding year after year, a stationary fence is best. Woven wire two feet in width will answer. Such a fence can be made to turn cattle by stretching one or two strands of barb wire along the top. Heavy Corn Feeding on Alfalfa Pasture Most Profitable——March pigs may be made ready for market at the close of the pasturage season, weigh- ing in October or November from, 200 to 250 pounds each. This can be done only when grain has been fed liberally from start to finish. In fact, when corn is not excessively high in price, the lib- eral use of grain on pasture seems to be most eco- nomical. At the Nebraska; Experiment Station four lots of pigs, ten in each lot, were given alfalfa pasture with corn in varying amounts. The aver- age record for each pig in the four lots is shown by the following table: Lot 2. Tot 3. Lot 4. Lot1. Light Medium Heavy No grain grain grain grain. ration. ration. ration. Pounds. Pounds. Pounds. Pounds. Av. wt. of each pig, Aug. 27.. 74.0 73.5 73.5 72.5 Av. wt. of each pig, Oct. 27.. 75.4 95.2 113.3 12622 Av. gain from Aug. 27 to Oot aise ap lensmeecats eae 1.4 21,7 39.8 53.7 Daily ain Mer Pisin. ce tem lose 02 34 63 85 Av. amt. of cern consumed by each pig per day....... Siac: 1.33 2.48 3.46 Corn consumed per pound of pan bs sare ees. tea 3.86 3.98 4.23 Cost of corn per 100 lbs. of REM Neo bo pono ota cdo ues EGOS 2.08 2.15 2.28 Cost of pasture per 100 Ibs. CHEE TRIN Siebel! oo be aol oe $14.30 $0.66 $0.30 $0.15 Total cost per 100 lbs. of gain 14.30 2.74 2.45 2.43 FATTENING PIGS IN THE FALL. 277 In making the estimates for cost of gains, corn at the time was worth 30 cents per bushel in Lin- coln, Nebraska, and alfalfa pasture was valued at $5 per acre for the growing season of five months, which would be $2 per acre for the two months the experiment was in progress. In this experi- ment the alfalfa fields were all of the same size and large enough to harvest hay while the pigs were on pasture. During the previous summer it was found that one acre of alfalfa would pasture twenty-four 100-pound shoats while on full grain feed, but this number injured the stand. In this test, one acre would have furnished sufficient feed for 10 pigs without grain, or 14 pigs receiving 1.33 pounds of corn per day, 17 receiving 2.48 pounds, or 20 receiving 3.46 pounds per day, by pasturing to the limit without cutting hay. From these estimates the cost of pasture per pig was computed. The experiment shows that the heaviest fed lot made somewhat the cheap- est gains. This lot was given a little less than a full feed of corn the first month and all that would be consumed the second month. Alfalfa pasture can hardly be figured at more than $1 per acre above the interest and taxes upon the land valua- tion. Were the alfalfa higher in price the results would be still more in favor of the heaviest fed lot. On the other hand, had corn been higher in price, as is often the case, Lot 3, which received about 75 per cent of all the corn they could consume, would have made the cheapest gains. Under average Western conditions a full feed of corn night and morning on alfalfa pasture is prob- ably the most profitable, taking into consideration the desirability of securing such gains as will enable the feeder to market at the close of the pasturage season. Pasture without grain proved to be little 278 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. more than a maintenance ration for these pigs, and was by far the most expensive of all. Such animals lack the digestive capacity necessary to make gains on bulky feed alone. Large, thin brood sows are able to make a growth, because of a larger capacity. In these experiments it was shown, that with the lot fed grain liberally on pasture, the same gains were made on about two-thirds of what grain had been consumed in a previous experiment where no pasture was supplied. Pigs running in pasture not only require less grain, but the effect of the exer- cise upon the general health of the animal is ex- tremely favorable for such feeding. In another ex- periment the addition of 5 per cent bone meal to a full ration of corn with alfalfa pasture lessened the amount of grain required for a pound of gain 22 per cent. This is the result of a single trial for a period of two months with ten pigs in each lot. Further experimentation must follow in order to gain reliable evidence concerning the value of bone meal fed with corn on alfalfa pasture. Fall Pigs.—If a sow produces but one litter of pigs per year, the proper time for farrowing is in the spring. In cold climates it takes considerably more feed to properly nourish a sow and pigs in winter than in summer, and warmer pens must be provided. Only mature sows should be expected to raise two litters per year. With good, liberal feed- ing a sow can produce two moderate sized litters without harm to herself or the pigs, if the latter are fed as early as possible. With two litters per year it is advisable to wean the young at the erd of seven weeks, breeding the sow the first heat following, the period of gestation. being sixteen weeks. Fall pigs after being weaned may be fed liber- ally with grain, giving corn and a percentage of pro- tein foods double that recommended for young pigs FATTENING PIGS IN THE FALL. 279 on pasture, at least until they are old enough to eat clover and alfalfa hay. One of these could then be substituted for a part of the protein concentrates. A liberal system of grain feeding all winter and early spring would put them in condition for a late spring or early summer market, but less crowding on grain during the winter, with corn on pasture until about July 1, would in all probability he more profitable. Rye pasture may be provided for early spring, but it is to be remembered that such pasture does not provide protein, as do rape and the legumes—alfalfa, clover and cowpeas. Poland-Chinas in the Feed-lot. CHAPTER XXVIIL. FATTENING PIGS IN WINTER. As indicated by the pasture experiment described in the previous chapter, when corn is relatively high in price, pork may be produced more economically by feeding less corn than would constitute a full feed on pasture—a daily allowance of not less than two per cent, nor more than three per cent of the live weight of the pig in pounds. Under such cir- cumstances considerable growth would be secured during the summer, and the fattening accomplished in winter with new and perhaps cheaper corn. Nearly all farmers, too, have some late spring pigs which can not be finished by fall, no matter how liberally fed, and must, therefore, be fattened in winter. Shelter.—In the economical production of pork in winter it is absolutely necessary ta provide Comfort- able quarters. Pigs will not make satisfactory gains if left to shiver for lack of shelter. Expensive struc- tures are not necessary. A shed boarded on “all sides, having an opening for entrance on the leeward side, with boards, cornstalks, or straw on top for a roof, and an abundance of bedding underneath, will answer the purpose, so far as the comfort of the pigs is concerned. _Such a shelter is warm enough in severely cold weather, if the roof is not too high from, the ground. The temperature can be more easily regulated, however, if the roof is moderately high and on one side of the shed are hung doors which can be left wide open or partly closed, ac- cording to the severity of the weather. Portable houses, as described on page 263, are also satisfac- 280—Ct«C °- FATTENING PIGS IN WINTER. 281 tory for fattening pigs, preventing, as they do, overheating caused by a large number sleeping in one nest. Winter Rations—In the West, where corn is abundant, the majority of farmers feed nothing but this grain, for reasons readily apparent. A basket of ears may be taken from the crib and scattered upon the ground with comparatively little labor, the pigs shelling the corn from the cob with little diffi- culty and eating it with relish. They consume a large quantity.and fatten quickly, enabling the farmer to market them after a comparatively short period of feeding. But while fairly good gains may be secured on corn alone, it does not follow that the best results are attained by practicing such a sys- tem. In fact, numerous tests made at different sta- tions comparing corn alone with corn supplemented with other foods furnish reliable evidence that corn properly supplemented is much superior to corn alone. From an economical point of view, a 100- pound pig of average flesh will show the largest gain from a given weight of food when there is present in the ration about one pound of protein, or flesh-making material, to 6.5 or 7 pounds of non- nitrogenous material, such as starches, sugars and fats. In corn there is one pound of protein, or ni- trogenous matter, to 9.7 non-nitrogenous. That this excess of non-nitrogenous matter in corn is not uti- lized at all, or in very small part, is a generally ac- cepted fact, because it has been proved conclusively by practical feeding tests. This being true, less food for a given gain wiil be required if something rich in protein is fed with the corn. Wheat Shorts a Source of Protein At the Wis- consin Experiment Station 5.37 pounds of corn were required for one pound of gain, and 5.22 pounds of wheat shorts were required for the same gain when 282 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. each was fed separately. By combining the two in equal proportions by weight, only 4.4 pounds of the mixture were required for one pound of gain. In this experiment there was required about one- fifth less corn for a pound of gain when the corn was mixed with wheat shorts. At the South Da- kota Station 16 per cent more grain was required for producing a given gain on shoats weighing 114 pounds, when corn alone was fed, than when the grain consisted of equal parts of corn and shorts. In this experiment shorts cost the same price per hun- dred as the corn, and the profits were therefore 16 per cent greater by mixing the two together. It was also found in this experiment that the gains from corn and shorts were Io per cent larger and 10 per cent cheaper than from shorts alone. Ina Mis- souri test, when 20 per cent of the grain ration con- sisted of shorts, 21 per cent less feed was required for each pound of gain than when corn alone was fed. At the same station 30 per cent was saved by making the ration 33 per cent shorts. In Nebraska 27 per cent was saved by feeding 20 per cent of shorts, and in an Indiana test with 50-pound pigs, 38 per cent was saved by feeding equal parts of shorts and corn in comparison with corn alone. In wheat shorts there is present one pound of protein, or nitrogenous matter, to four pounds of non-nitrogenous. There is, therefore, a defi- ciency of the non-nitrogenous, or starchy, mate- rial in this foodstuff. By mixing shorts with corn we are able to secure a proportion of nutrients which more nearly meets the requirements of the animal. The most economical proportion of corn to shorts depends upon current prices. If corn sells relatively high and shorts low, equal parts of the two would be profitable for fattening hogs. It is usually the case, however, that shorts are worth FATTENING PIGS IN WINTER. 283 considerably more per hundred than corn. Under these circumstances better profits, but perhaps somewhat smaller gains, would be obtained by feed- ing a larger proportion of corn. At average West- ern prices, the proportion of three pounds of corn to one pound of wheat shorts is ordinarily most profitable. This proportion can be varied slightly, according to current prices. Should corn ever reach the low mark of 10 cents per bushel, as it did in the West at one time, and protein foods remain high in price, then it would be profitable to feed corn alone. At that price the feeder could better afford to waste the excess of starch in corn than buy any protein foeds to balance the ration and convert the whole into meat. Concentrated Protein Foods.—There are years when wheat shorts are too high to be used by the feeder. As a substitute the farmer has at his disposal such commercial protein foods as oil meal, gluten meal and tankage, which, as the table in the ap- pendix shows, contain a little more than twice as much protein as is found in wheat shorts. It will also be noted that the soy bean, grown in the South- ern States, contains about the same as is found in oil meal or gluten meal. A ration made up of eight pounds of corn to one pound of any one of these four foods will answer the same purpose as the ra- tion of corn and shorts in the proportion suggested. In an Indiana experiment, where light pigs were fed two-thirds corn and one-third soy bean meal in comparison with corn, 46 per cent less of the former feed was required for a given gain. The Missouri Staticn found oil meal with corn a de- cided advantage. Cottonseed Meal Oftén Poisonous for Pigs. Cot: tonseed meal, another Southern product, while rich in protein, containing even more than the food- ~ 284 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. stuffs mentioned, cannot safely be used in pig feed- ing, because of its deleterious effects upon the sys- tem. Pigs fed even a small proportion of cotton seed meal are apt to become sick, and if the feeding is continued they often die. The Texas Station re- ports its successful use for pigs, but Northern feed- ers should not risk it so long as there are other protein foods on the market at corresponding prices. Running pigs behind cattle fed cottonseed meal, however, seems to be entirely safe. Skim milk may be fed to fattening pigs and will furnish all the protein rieeded 1f supplied in suffi- cient quantity. Three pounds of skim milk mixed with one pound of corn meal makes a very satis- factory ration for fattening swine. It has been found by experiments that fattening pigs fed liber- ally upon skim milk mixed with meal—mostly corn —can be made to eat more feed per day and will make larger gains than on any combination of foods without milk. Near large creameries it is often possible to procure skim milk in large quantities. If it. canbe? shad “ata “price, not*to “exceedamg cents per hundred pounds, it can be fed with profit. In feeding this or any other of the protein foods recommended in connection with corn, the propor- tion could be slightly altered to conform more to prices prevailing for foodstuffs of either character. In the Eastern States, where corn is relatively high, more protein foods could be used profitably. Alfalfa Hay for Hogs.—In the. West, where al- falfa hay is now being extensively grown, its use | as a source of protein to supplement corn has sim- plified very much the problem of economic pork pro- duction. To give the reader an idea of the worth of alfalfa hay as a substitute for shorts or milk in connection with corn feeding, and to further empha- size what has been said concerning the value of corn FATTENING PIGS IN WINTER. 285 properly supplemented in comparison with corn alone, the results of an experiment performed at the Nebraska Experiment Station during the winter of "1902-03 are given below. Twenty pigs, uniform in quality, were divided into four lots of five each. The following table shows the average record of each pig by lot: wre ~ my a P=) Seo yg” See en. 9 coe, #2 38 q #8 @5 one og Fie (ay enh Piote Wevaie S38 S&S g8s Sih ay Pat re neat Se BES Sh 38S obs CR ae oa Do ors SSE Sat < < < < cs cf Lbs. Lbs Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Ot pM sefice Sistas ot 127.6 206.2 78.6 93 s See) 7.4 Corn meal<.:.. AB ee ais's areonte stad 587 £6 TerG Ger lie en se 3 12922 261:8 1382:6 1.57 E crate be ree Corn meal ..... Shoes ategare AGA say 585.4 Milk solids (in 1,170 pounds SKIMMERS) | evens cine Stnoe Mises cisecbs 110.5 695.9 To tec ly site sce rs 126 227.6 101.6 12 deen 5.8 Corn meal, 80%. Sant SOCAL Seance aoe Slitinttsh AOYje eae ro cote ORGOe Cees EA 118.4 592.3 1D) fd (eae 128.4 230 101.6 Oh eat eae OLS Corn meal, 80%. ..... eects erate sie 474.8 Mlfaltar “AO%i 0. | hase Sicds shsicere a aor 118.7 593.5 The alfalfa fed in this experiment was in the na- ture of chaff, consisting mostly of leaves which had fallen from the hay as it was thrown from the mow to the barn floor for cattle. For the purpose of mak- ing a true comparison of these leaves with the whole plant, an analysis was made. The leaves were found to be 40 per cent richer in crude protein than the entire plant, 30 per cent higher in fat, 15 per cent higher in mineral matter, and 50 per cent lower in crude fiber, which substance is largely indigestible 286 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. matter. This chaff was first mixed with the corn meal, then placed in the feed trough, where it was made into a thick slop with water. The other lots were fed in the same way, except that the feed for Lot 2 was mixed with skim milk instead of water. Cost of Production.—With the alfalfa hay worth $7 per ton, the leaves, containing 40 per cent more protein, would be worth approximately $10 per ton. The shorts cost $12.50 per ton delivered. The Dairy Department charged 15 cents per hundred for the skim milk used. Corn was delivered to the barns at 30 cents per bushel. Adding the usual rate of six cents per hundred for grinding, the corn meal cost $12 per ton. At these prices, each hundred pounds of gain in the several lots cost as follows: Pots 1 Gorn’ alone A. See re crcserecavevenestepereth tet kostenlos $4.48 Lot 2; “Cornzandeskim milk'.3 23 Spe eee coe ee 3.97 Lot':3:: Corn: and shorts wi c.nos dcteie cele eithe «sc bale ereeetete Be) Lot 4.-"“Cornyand valfalita. issn 8 ter ctclerstom wrerstoreie cuetet beteere 3.40 The skim-milk pigs were the most hearty feeders and made the heaviest gains, but it proved a more expensive source of protein at the prices quoted. This experiment shows that at these prices, and in the proportions used in the experiment, skim milk will make corn bring four cents more per bushel; wheat shorts, eight cents more; and alfalfa leaves, nine cents more. Assuming that only 5 per cent of the 252,520,173 bushels of corn produced in Nebraska in 1902 was fed to hogs as a single food, these figures would go to show that over $1,000,000 more wealth would have been added to the State if wheat shorts or alfalfa had been substituted for one-fifth of the corn fed. An examination of the carcasses of one corn fed pig and one cern and alfalfa pig showed the pres- ence of more lean meat where alfalfa was fed. The alfalfa pig also had better developed vital organs, —. FATTENING PIGS IN WINTER. a Oe more blood and much stronger bone, a matter re- quiring further investigation before inferences can safely be drawn, although entirely consistent, inas- much as alfalfa is rich in protein and mineral matter. In the experiment described, alfalfa chaff proved to be as valuable, pound for pound, as wheat shorts. From the fact that the leaves furnish more nourish- ment than the stem, we should naturally expect bet- ter results from chaff than from the entire plant. While not all farmers have alfalfa chaff in abun- dance, cut alfalfa hay may be had in almost unlim- ited quantity wherever alfalfa is grown. Machines are put on the market at moderate prices which will cut the stems in lengths suitable for feeding hogs. Most feeders grind the corn and mix it with this cut alfalfa hay. For most economical gains, it should be used in about the proportion of four pounds of corn meal to one pound of alfalfa hay, and fed in the form of a thick slop by using water or, prefera- bly, milk. This mixture should be fed very liberally three times per day—in fact, all that the pigs will consume. While grinding the corn and cutting the alfalfa hay will perhaps give somewhat larger gains, it is doubtful if enough better results are ob- tained to pay for the labor involved. If the first crop of alfalfa hay is used, the stems might as well be wasted, as they are extremely difficult for pigs to assimilate, and they contain little nourishment. Last Cutting of Alfalfa Best—Wherever it’ is possible, a-farmer who grows alfalfa should put away the last cutting for pig feeding. Late in the season there is usually less rainfall, and the alfalfa grows up with a much smaller stem and correspond- ingly larger leaf surface. With early cuttings of alfalfa, the excessive bulk prevents a fattening hog from getting all. the protein he requires. If he is forced to consume a proportion of hay sufficiently 288 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. large for protein needs—by having it first cut in pieces and then mixed with corn meal—his limited digestive capacity is such that, although he is full fed, he is undernourished. The small stem and leafy character of the last cutting overcome this difficulty. It can be fed to good advantage in the proportion, three pounds of corn to one‘of alfalfa, though with the rack the pigs get all they wish, which will amount to about 3 or 4 to 1 of corn. Hay Rack for Hogs.—Alfalfa hay is very com- monly scattered upon the ground for hogs, but this practice occasions considerable waste of valuable material, especially when the ground is soft and muddy. Better results may be secured by provid- ing suitable racks. The illustration below shows a form of rack which has proved to be a success in every respect. The rack was designed by H. W. Davis Jr., a former student of the writer, for feeding fourth-cutting alfalfa hay to hogs which are following corn-fed cattle. Although the hogs have all the corn they will take, there is seldom a time when some are not seen eating hay from this self- feeding rack, and they no doubt consume all that is needed, The Davis Self-Feeding Hay Rack for Pigs—F. H. Smith Hst., Ad- z dison, Michigan, —=_ j \ ) | Vinal SSS SSS = i; ees : UME 2S SSSI Rack for Feeding Uncut Alfalfa to Hogs. Designed by H. W. Davis, Jr., Saltillo, Nebraska. 290 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. Mr. Davis in forwarding a description of the rack says: “If built as indicated I am sure that it will prove a success. J have used mine for two seasons and, although it is small, I have fed several tons through it with very little waste and almost no bother. The rack may be of any length. It should not be more than 3 or 3% feet wide, as the alfalfa will lodge in the center. Do not have the fencing board at the bottom more than g inches from the top to the ground; if higher, the hogs will get their fore feet into the rack in trying to reach over it. The 2x4 at the bottom of the hopper should be six inches from outside line of corner posts and at the bottom 14 inches from the floor of the rack, or 18 inches from the ground.” Clover Hay for Hogs.—There is no reason why farmers in the clover belt should not be able to feed clover in the same way. With this legume, as with alfalfa, the short, fine hay is superior for hogs. If the first cutting of clover, as of alfalfa, is fed, much more will be wasted because of its coarseness, and coarser hay would also move downward with less freedom in such a rack, unless the sides are built straight up and down. In sections of heavy rain- fall some sort af roof protection would be desirable. Inasmuch as hay may be put in a self-feeding rack at intervals of several days, the labor-saving item is no small one. ‘With such a rack, hogs may have hay before them at all times. In addition to the hay, fattening hogs should be_supplied with all the corn that will be consumed readily twice a day. Most Profitable Weight to Market.—At just what weight the pig can be most profitably marketed is a question which has given rise to considerable dif- ference of opinion. Some hold that the hog should be fed until a weight of 350 to 400 pounds has been attained, while others go to the opposite extreme, FATTENING PIGS IN WINTER. 291 advocating the sale of hogs before 200 pounds have been reached. In formulating any conclusions con- cerning the best time to market, there are two things which should be given consideration: (1) market quotations on pigs of various weights; (2) the economy of gains at different stages of growth. Since vegetable oils have come into use as lard sub- stitutes, resulting in lower prices for the latter commodity and less prestige for the heavy hog, the well-finished 200 to 250-pound hog is now quite as much in favor and brings about as much per pound as the 350 to 400-pound hog. From the viewpoint of gains for food consumed, the lighter hog has a distinct advantage, as shown by the following table, compiled by Henry, of Wisconsin, and published in “Feeds and Feeding.” , DaTA RELATIVE TO FEED, WEIGHT AND GAIN OF PIGS —Many AMERICAN STATIONS. ~ nm (=| =) z eae mw) SS 4 g ct z Be OP ohne oa = oo a ee oo & Qe a S Weight of pies 5 ye ge. Ss ge Sao in pounds. 2 ae A a ok == ue bs Se 82 €5 €5 ¢2 ° 32 G8 53% < Zi Se = a = < iS Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. GOR 0) aeetaneatiere ts 38 Oye AL AGA 225° 5.95 (ho RADE} {i errroied (UO eepene 78 SOO fiesocooK 4.00 83 400 IX Hoy NB oe a Be 198s 13 19) 495. 479) 3375 0) 437 150) TOU On = meets. os 174 11 307 489. 5.91. 343 41:24 482 SI) tore eo; ake 72s S00) 36-51 2291s esa, 498 D5 OMiGe Ue aearenste TA 8 AG eee 40) O74 AAG ol 300 to 350........° 320 3 19005" “W50) 32:35) 40>. 535 Referring to the last column of the above table, it will be seen that as the pig grows larger, more food is required for a given gain. This seems en- tirely reasonable*in view of the fact, that the larger 292 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. the hog, the more food is reqttired for maintenance; by which is meant more food to keep the body warm, force the blood to circulate, and maintain other functional activities commensurate with larger size, all of which requirements are made at the expense of actual increase in weight from food consumed. The smaller the pig the less food is required for a given gain. - Yet it is not profitable to kill an animal too young, because of the initial cost at birth. Everything considered, it would seem that the pig should be marketed at a weight some- where between 200 and 250 pounds for maximum profits. The above table is of further interest in that it shows how large a daily ration pigs at different weights should consume, and the gain per day which might reasonably be expected under average conditions. Pigs thin in flesh would, of course, con- sume larger amounts than stated and would gain more accordingly. Pens for Winter Pig-feeding Tests, Nebraska Experiment Station. CHAPTER XXVIII. CORN SUBSTITUTES FORSSWINE: Throughout the corn belt of the United States, corn is almost entirely depended upon for pig feed- ing. While no feed has yet been found which has proved superior to corn properly fed, yet there are occasional years when certain other grains are cheap enough to be serviceable for the production of pork. On most farms, too, it is advisable to grow certain other grains in the crop rotation. In the semiarid districts small grains are better able to stand the dry weather than corn, and such grains are there- fore oftentimes cheaper for feeding purposes. Barley, which is grown to a considerable extent in Northern latitudes and the extreme West, is of two kinds, the bald varieties and the common. The latter has a hull and is much less valuable for pig feeding. Though classed as a starchy food, barley contains a higher percentage of protein than corn, and it is probably this fact which shows barley to be slightly superior to corn when each is fed alone. At those stations where each was supplemented by shorts and skim milk, the corn proved to be better than barley. Millet seed, which yielded at the rate of 30 bush- els to the acre at the South Dakota Experiment Sta- tion, was fed to pigs in comparison with wheat and with barley. In this test one pound of wheat proved equivalent to I.o1 pounds barley and to 1.22 pounds millet seed. Millet weighs 56 pounds to the bushel and barley 48. Each yielded in pork the same price per bushel. 293 204 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. Wheat can be grown in a drier climate than corn, and in such localities is frequently fed. In feeding wheat to swine it should be first ground or soaked, for the kernels are so small and hard that many will pass through the alimentary tract undi- gested if fed dry and unground. At the Nebraska Station it was found that there was a saving of Io per cent of whole dry wheat by grinding it, and a saving of 8 per cent by soaking it from 18 to 24 hours. Soaking was most profitable because of the greater expense of grinding. In the same experiment it was found that ground wheat gave 9 per cent larger gains than ground corn. This may be due to the fact that wheat, with its somewhat higher protein con- tent, is more nearly balanced than corn alone. A Utah test showed an advantage for wheat until pea- meal was added to corn to furnish more protein, when the latter proved just as valuable. After re- viewing a large number of experiments with v heat feeding, it seems safe to assert that wheat is about 3 per cent ahead of corn, pound for pound, when each is fed separately; but properly supplemented, corn is just as good. Wheat screenings can often be had at a price below that of corn, and if of good quality, consist- ing of cracked and shrunken kernels with no dirt, they are very nearly equal to corn. Screenings should also be soaked or ground. Frosted wheat is entirély satisfactory for pigs. Tests at the Central Experiment Farm of Canada show frosted wheat very nearly equal to the un- frosted. Rye is not as well relished by pigs as is wheat. Since the two grains are similar in composition, the greater palatability of wheat no doubt explains why better gains are made on wheat than on rye. From comparative tests made, it seems conservative to say CORN SUBSTITUTES FOR PIGS. 295 that wheat has a feeding value about 10 per cent greater than rye. Like wheat, rye should either be ground or soaked when fed. Kafir Corn.—At the Kansas Experiment Station, where Kafir corn has been grown for a series of years, it has been found to average 55 bushels per acre—25 per cent more than common Indian corn. Farther west than Manhattan, in dry sections, the. difference would be still greater. In pig feeding tests at Kansas, when corn meal was compared with Kafir corn meal, it was found that one pound of corn was equivalent to 1.17 pounds of Kafir corn. When each was fed with 33 per cent soy bean meal, a rich protein food, one pound of corn and soy bean meal was equivalent to 1.07 pounds of Kafir corn and soy bean meal, but when soy bean meal was made 20 per cent of the ration, one pound of Kafir corn meal was equal to 1.06 pounds of cornmeal. Kafir corn, like common corn, is deficient in protein, and it has also a constipating efféct, both of which faults soy bean meal or oil meal will correct. On account of the small size and hardness of the seeds, it is advisable to grind or thoroughly soak Kafir corn before feeding. Cane, or sorghum, seed is very similar to Kafir corn in composition and it should be fed in the same way. The Kansas experiments show cane seed to be somewhat inferior to Kafir corn for pig feeding. Oats.—For feeding market hogs, oats are ordi- narily too expensive in comparison with corn, and fer fattening hogs they contain altogether too much hull, which is largely indigestible matter. Oats are fairly good for brood sows, provided they can be had at a price per hundred no greater than corn. For young pigs they are not satisfactory, owing to their bulk, unless fed in a very limited quantity. Emmer, commonly called Speltz, has been used 296 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. in pig-feeding tests at the North Platte (Nebraska) Substation, where it was found to have a food value considerably below corn and below barley. It con- tains rather too much hull for fattening pigs. Potatoes contain from 75 to 80 per cent water and the remainder is largely starch. Considering the starch content, potatoes would properly be consid- ered a corn substitute. Owing to their large water content, they are in reality too bulky for pigs, unless the water is first driven out by cooking. From ex- periments conducted at the Wisconsin Experiment Station, it would seem that one pound of corn is equivalent to about 4% pounds of uncooked pota- toes. This agrees closely with experiments made in Denmark. It would not be profitable, therefore, to feed potatoes if they are more than one-fourth the price of corn per bushel. . Jerusalem artichokes, like potatoes, grow under- ground as tubers, and are sometimes planted for pigs. At the Missouri Experiment Station they were found to be the equivalent of potatoes. Not having more than one-fourth the food value of corn, they are hardly competitors of this cereal for economic pork produc- tion, though they are valuable for brood sows and growing pigs. Sugar beets at the Colorado Experiment Station proved little more than a maintenance ration when fed alone. With grain they were worth $1.50 per ton. It was therefore concluded that any succulence needed for growing pigs could be furnished more cheaply in grass. Sugar beet pulp gave a gain equivalent to that from sugar beets, and, as indicated by the test, would seem to be worth as much per ton. Sugar beet pulp, if made not more. than one-fourth the grain ra- tion by weight for pigs, should give better results than corn alone. Corn silage, like roots, is very watery and there- CORN SUBSTITUTES FOR PIGS. 207 fore somewhat too bulky for fattening pigs unless fed in very small quantity—not more than one-fourth the ration. For brood sows a larger proportion could be fed. Corn silage is most satisfactory for sows giving milk, as its succulence seems to have the effect of stimulating the flow, which is especially desirable when a large litter is being raised. A brood sow could easily consume equal parts by weight of silage and grain, but the grain part in that case would necessarily be made up of sufficient protein food to supply the needs of the sow. Moreover, this protein food should be of a concentrated nature, like shorts or oil meal, rather than clover or alfalfa, since the silage pro- vides all the bulk that can be utilized.- Corn silage is even more deficient in protein than corn. CHAPTER XXIX. PROTEIN CONCENTRATES AND THE PREP- ARATION OF FOODS. FOR SWINE. Feeds Supplementary to Corn for Pigs.—In the preceding chapters on pig feeding, the use of corn has been described in more or less detail. As already stated, this is done because corn is almost entirely de- pended upon as the basic part of the ration, owing to its relative cheapness. Should there be occasion for feeding any of the so-called corn substitutes, the method of supplementing them would be similar to the methods described for corn, the only difference being the amount, or proportion, of supplementary food used. None of these corn substitutes will require a larger proportion of protein foods than that recom- mended for corn; in fact, most of them require less, because they contain a higher percentage of protein. Wheat and rye, as noted by the chart on page 27, have nutritive ratios very near to. requirements for fattening mature hogs. In the use of such foods for pig feeding, not more than one-half the proportion of protein or supplementary foods recommended for use with corn is needed. For example, where a ration of 88 per cent corn and 12 per cent oil meal is suggested, 94 per cent wheat or rye and 6 per cent oil meal would furnish approximately the same nutrients. Barley would need a little more oil meal — than wheat, because it contains less protein. Kafir corn should be supplemented in the same manner as corn. As previously stated, the choice of protein foods to supplement any of these starchy foods depends entirely upon their relative efficiency at the current 298 CORN SUBSTITUTES FOR PIGS. 299 market price. The efficiency of each is largely a question of protein content. As with starchy foods, palatability is a factor in measuring the value of a protein food, but any slight difference in the palata- bility of such concentrated foods is less noticeable in the ration because of the small proportion used. Since it is the practice to base the value of the so-called protein foods very largely upon the per- centage of digestible protein contained, figuring upon this basis, we shall assume clover to be worth $5.00 per ton, then alfalfa is worth $8.00, cowpea hay $8.00, wheat shorts $9.00, wheat bran $9.00, Canadian peas $12.50, cowpeas $13.60, skim milk $2.10, soy beans $21.70, oil meal (old process) $21.50, gluten meal $19.00, tankage $22.00, dried blood $38.00. In computing the value of tankage per ton it is assumed that the coefficient of digestibility of the protein is the same as in dried blood. But to get a more nearly correct estimate of the relative worth of these foods, some value must be given to the carbohydrates and fats found in each. This value should not be more than the actual cost of carbohydrates as’ found in corn, their cheapest source. Assuming fats to be 2.25 times as valuable as carbohydrates (their heat ratio), and placing upon each pound of digestible carbohydrates in ex- cess of what is contained in clover a valuation of one- half cent, the relative value per ton of each food- stuff would then be, clover $5.00, alfalfa $8.00, cow- pea hay $8.00, bran $9.00, shorts $10.00, Canadian peas $13.80, cowpeas $15.30, skim milk $2.10, soy beans $23.30, gluten meal $23.00, oil meal $22.50, tankage $23.00, dried blood $38.00. However, the work of masticating the unground peas and beans, and the still greater energy expended in grinding the hay, would place these foodstuffs somewhat below the prices quoted. Just what esti- 300 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. mate should be made for mechanical condition it is difficult to say. If it pays to grind grains at a cost of 5 cts. per hundred, and to reduce hay to the same condition at a cost of 15 cts. per hundred, then it would be necessary to add approximately $1.00 per ton to the value of bran (a coarse food), Ca- nadian peas, cowpeas and soy beans, and $3.00 per ton to the-value of the more concentrated shorts, oil meal, gluten meal, tankage and dried blood. The value of skim milk would also be in- creased at least 70 cts. per ton. The work of Zuntz in Germany and of Armsby in America indicates that from 4o to 50 per cent more energy is expended in masticating coarse fodders than grains, and a dif- ference of $3.co per ton for texture, or condition, would seem to be conservative. In the writer’s opin- ion these additions would more nearly represent the true comparative values of the several foodstuffs for supplementitg corn, at least for such animals as pigs, which are not equipped to utilize bulky foods in quantity. Then with this second revision of compara- tive values, taking into consideration, as we have, tex- ture of foodstuffs, but not palatability, yet assuming all to be of good quality, the final estimate, with clover at $5.00 a ton, would make alfalfa worth $8.00, cowpea hay $8.00, bran $11.00, shorts $13.00, Canadian peas $14.80, cowpeas $16.30, skim milk $2.80, soy beans $25.30, gluten meal $26.00, oil meal $25.50, tankage $26.00 and dried blood $41.00. Zuntz, the German investigator, found that one- sixth of the total nutrients in linseed meal was used by the horse in the work of mastication and one-half of those in clover hay. This would mean a higher value for the concentrates than given. Owing to the fact that foodstuffs under different conditions vary slightly in composition and digestibility, it would be folly to use the above scale with the idea CORN SUBSTITUTES FOR PIGS. 301 that it is mathematically correct. It is simply introduced as a sort of guide for the feeder in his effort to secure the foodstuff most useful at the -market price. When cost is being considered, the purchaser must figure on relative prices de- livered at the farm. In case of a long haul from station to farm, the more concentrated foodstuffs would have the advantage. In supplying any of these with corn to fattening hogs, figuring upon a basis of digestible protein content, there would be required 40 per cent of the ration clover, or 28 per cent alfalfa, 28 per cent cowpea hay, 25 per cent shorts, 25 per cent bran, 20 per cent Canadian peas, 18 per cent cowpeas, 10 per cent oil meal, Io per cent gluten meal, 10 per cent soy bean meal, ro per cent tankage, or 6 per cent dried blood. With the per- centage of each as stated, the remainder being corn, we have what would be under average Western con- ditions a good fattening ration for hogs, though a little too much bulk in the case of clover, al- falfa and cowpea hay. These supplementary foods have all been described in the chapters on cattle feed- ing, except tankage and dried, blood, both of which are more relished by swine than by cattle or sheep, and are more successfully used with swine. Tankage is described in Bulletin 65, issued by the Iowa Experiment Station, as follows: “Digester tankage is made from meat scraps, fat trimmings and scrap bones. These are taken up as fast as taken from the animals and put into_a large steel tank and cooked. under a _ live’ steam pressure of 40 pounds to the square inch, which cooks out the tallow. After the steam is turned off, it is allowed to settle, when the grease rises to the top and is drawn off. After the grease is drawn off the tankage is kept agitated and by evaporation the water is extracted until the tankage contains about 8 302 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING, per cent moisture. It is then taken out of the tank, allowed to cool, is ground and stored ready for ship- ment.” Dried blood is simply the blood from slaughtered animals dried to a powder. In the process of drying, sufficient heat is applied to kill any disease germs which may be present in the blood. Both tankage and dried blood must be kept dry. If moistened by rain, putre- faction begins, and the feed gives off an offensive odor, making it not only disagreeable to handle but unpalatable to the animals. Owing to the concen- tration of these foods, they must be used with great care. If too much us fed, it is not only expensive but harmful to the animals. If not carefully mixed with grain, some pigs may get more than is needed and some not enough. Neither tankage nor dried blood should be put to soak several hours before feeding. The value of these foods depends largely upon their quality. Generally speaking, though not always, -the packing houses are careful to put on sale for feeding purposes only that which is suitable. The inferior material is usually sold for fertilizing purposes. At the Indiana Experiment Station corn alone was com- pared with a mixture of 84 per cent corn and 16 per cent tankage and another mixture of 91 per cent corn and 9 per cent tankage. When 16 per cent tankage was fed, 39 per cent less feed was required for a pound of gain than with corn alone, and when g per cent tankage was fed, 35 per cent less feed was re- quired. With corn worth $20.00 per ton and tankage worth $30.00, one hundred pounds of gain on corn alone cost $5.20; on corn and 16 per cent tankage, $4.00; and on corn and 9 per cent tankage, $3.80. At the Iowa Experiment Station 30 per cent less feed was required with corn and 16 per cent tankage than with corn alone. With corn worth $22.00 per CORN SUBSTITUTES FOR PIGS. 303 ton and tankage $32.00 per ton, the cost of produ- cing gains was 12 per cent less than on corn alone. From the results of these and other experiments, it seems evident that at ordinary Western prices tankage may be most profitably fed when it consti- tutes not over 10 per cent of the ration, the remain- der being corn. Mangel-wurzels and Rutabagas are much richer in protein than sugar beets, and may be considered as protein foods. Owing to the fact that they contain go per cent water, they are too bulky for fattening hogs. For brood sows suckling pigs they are excel- lent, stimulating, as do sugar beets, a good flow of milk for the nourishment of the pigs. While corn silage serves this purpose at a much less expense, when it is fed, protein must be supplied from other sources. Where land is high-priced and labor not too costly, roots are entirely practical, for breeding stock at least. Condimental stock foods are said to contain prop- erties which make them useful adjuncts to grain for swine feeding. As mentioned in the chapters on the dairy cow, emphasis is made of the fact that they have a medicinal effect which stimulates the flow of digestive fluids, rendering more food digestible. At the Indiana Experiment Station 2% per cent of a mixed grain ration for pigs was American Stock Food. The cost of producing gains on this ration was I5 per cent greater than the same ration with- out stock food. At the Iowa Experiment Station it was found that corn alone produced gains at a cost of 2 per cent more than corn and Standard Stock Food, and 12 per cent more than corn and tankage. It would seem, therefore, that a ration of corn alone, a very unbalanced one, is slightly im- proved by the addition of a little stock food; but no supplemental food is more costly to buy. The 304. PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. prices paid for condimental stock foods are out of all proportion to any food value they may possess for swine as well as other classes of stock. Grinding Grain for Swine.—From experiments made with pigs in which ground and unground corn were compared, it would seem that grinding does not pay under all conditions. The results of experi- ments made at the Kentucky, Missouri and Ohio Experiment Stations show on an average a saving of 7 per cent of the corn by grinding. The results of four experiments at the Wisconsin Station show a saving of 8 per cent by grinding. Even with this most favorable showing for grinding corn, it would not pay in the West, where corn is relatively low in price. A saving of 8 per cent by grinding would be 8 pounds out of 100. Eight pounds of corn is not ordinarily worth in the West the price charged for grinding; which is from 6 to 8 cents per hun- dred, to say nothing of the cost of labor in hauling the corn to the mill and handling it. Wherever the pig is able to grind grain for himself, it is un- doubtedly an extravagance to use artificial power. The mechanism of the animal is much more perfect than that of the machine. It has been determined that the horse can convert into work 34 per cent of the available energy of food, besides that needed for body maintenance. It requires a very efficient steam engine to convert into work a per cent one- third as great. Moreover, the animal is its own engi- neer, working without pay, and having an abundance of time at his disposal. Wiuth corn high in price or with cheap power, grinding may pay, or if it is desirable to mix a concentrated food like tankage with corn, grinding will be an advantage because it makes a better medium for diluting the tank- age. In feeding small, hard grains like wheat, rye, CORN SUBSTITUTES FOR PIGS. 305 etc., grinding is practicable unless soaking can be done conveniently. Wet versus Dry Meal.—Meal is ‘better fed moistened than dry, because more can be con- sumed. The average of tests made at the Muin- nesota, Wisconsin, Oregon and Missouri Experi- ment Stations shows that 7 per cent larger gains were made by feeding meal wet than by feeding it dry. Unlike cattle and sheep, hogs have a rela- tively large intestinal capacity, which gives them a more active starch digestion in the intestine, mak- ing the mixture cf saliva in the mouth less im- portant with them than with these other animals. Wet feed is not in favor for cattle and sheep. Soaking Grain for Pigs.—In a winter experiment conducted by the writer, it was found that 9% per cent of whole wheat was saved by first soaking it from eighteen to twenty-four hours. During freezing weather warm water was used. Soak- ing the wheat gave very nearly as large gains from the same consumption of food as grinding it, and proved to be more economical because of the less expense incurred, a point more recently confirmed by the Missouri Station. All grains are undoubt- edly made more easily digested by first being soaked. During hot summer weather it is some- times best not to soak longer than twelve hours on account of souring, though pigs do not object to some acidity. Cooking Feed for Swine.—The average results from twenty separate tests made at eight experi- ment stations show an actual loss of 9 per cent of the food by cooking. Were the labor involved to be considered, the loss would be considerably more than indicated. The diminished feeding value of food when cooked may be partially explained by the fact that the protein coagulated by heat 306 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING, is made less digestible, just as the albumen of the hard boiled egg is less digestible than that of the soft boiled egg. In the experiments made with cooked feed it was furthermore found that less was consumed. Potatoes, which contain but little pro- tein, are undoubtedly improved by being cooked, because cooking breaks up the tough starch cells. Warming feed in cold weather is no doubt a good practice: Charcoal and Ashes for Pigs.—It is always ad- visable to provide pigs with a box containing charcoal and ashes, in which has been mixed a lit- tle slaked lime and salt. This is especially im- portant in winter when the ground is frozen. It is even more important when the ration consists large- lv of corn, which, as has been said, is deficient in mineral ingredients. Disinfectants.—It is an excellent plan to occa- sionally sprinkle a weak solution of carbolic acid, zenoleum, chloro-naptholeum, or some other disin- tectant about the pens, on the bedding, etc. This will lessen the risk from germ disease. Dipping for Lice——Where pigs are kept in con- siderable numbers it will pay the farmer to have a dipping plant. With such an equipment the herd may be run through a disinfecting solution at inter- vals to kill lice, at the same time lessening the risk from contagious diseases. Vermin, unless kept in check, give no little trouble, and prevent the mak- ing of the largest possible gains. Spraying with a pump may be done, but the work is much more thorough and satisfactory when the dipping tank is used. Such a tank can be purchased for a mod- erate sum and in a very short time will pay for itself. Cleanliness in the Pens.—Pig-pens are too often neglected because of the prevailing notion that pigs CORN SUBSTITUTES FOR PIGS. 307 do just as well surrounded with a certain amount of filth, and to many people the pig is a disagree- able object because of such conditions. This is a mistaken notion. The farmer will be abundantly paid for his trouble by keeping his pens clean and well bedded, for pigs with such care will not only grow faster and be less subject to disease, but will be far more desirable tenants on the farm. Fresh Water.—This should be supplied in troughs, or, better still, in some of the approved drinking fountains. If the water can be warmed during cold weather, feed will be saved, as the pig, not having the natural protection other farm ani- mals have, is easily chilled by cold water. Exercise.—Experiments have been conducted which show that pigs running at will in lots or fields do better than those kept closely confined. All hogs do better if given some exercise, though less is needed with mature hogs than with pigs, which are developing bone and muscle. As previously men- tioned, a lack of exercise is one cause of the disease called “thumps” in young pigs. PART VI FARM POULTRY By Mary L. Smith. ‘CHAPTER XXX. TYPES OF FOWLS. Chickens the Most Practical Branch of Poultry Husbandry for the Farm.—No farm equipment is complete without poultry of some kind, not only be- cause they are economical producers, but also be- cause they consume refuse from the kitchen and granaries which even pigs cannot utilize. By them insects of various kinds are converted into delicious meat and eggs for the farmer’s table or for the mar- ket, returning their equivalent in money. Since this volume is for the farmer, the subject of poultry raising will be presented entirely from the farmer’s point of view. The raising of ducks for the market, chickens known as broilers, squabs, etc., are, for the most part, branches of poultry farming rather than of general farming, and are not adaptable to all farms in every locality. But eggs, besides being a most convenient source of protein food and the best meat substitute at the farmer’s disposal, are a condensed product that can be produced and transported with profit from points far distant from our large markets. While it is undoubtedly profitable to raise chickens to sell for meat as other stock on the farm is sold—for it costs no more to make a pound of gain on the chicken than on the hog or sheep or 309 310 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. beef steer—it is equally certain that at our Western markets there is at present more money in eggs than in meat. Since man has_ succeeded, by selection and breeding, in increasing the laying capacity of the domestic hen from 40 eggs a year to from 150 to 200 or more, and since by investigation and experiments in the science of feeding and care he has made it possible for her to produce a goodly number of those eggs in winter when eggs are high, it is the farmer’s opportunity to employ this means of adding to the earnings of the farm. “Chores” in winter make up the principal part of the farmer’s work. It is when the care of the fowls becomes a part of the chores as important as looking after the other stock, that the farmer will see the practical side of the subject ; and as soon as he becomes truly interested in these feathered friends of his, he will find the. “poultry chores” the pleasantest of gis daily tasks. . In summer the farmer’s wife or daughters usu- ally do the lighter work connected with the poul- try, expecting the men to take time for only such heavier tasks as the cleaning of the houses, the making of crops, feeding-racks, etc. This out-of- door work is most beneficial, both to the women and to the chickens. Women, as a general thing, are painstaking and faithful in their care of little chickens, and are usually successful, if their judg- ment is as good as their intentions and if they are provided with conveniences for caring for them. These are not expensive. Many of them simply require a little time from a man handy with saw and hammer. Then, too, it is of the utmost impor- tance to the farmer that the children of the house- hold be allowed to help with the _ poultry so that they may become interested in the creatures around them, learning early in life to be TYPES OF FOWLS. 311 gentle and kind, and to consider the comfort and welfare of the dumb animals upon the farm. Classification of Fowls.—With respect to utility, chickens are divided into three classes, laying fowls, general-purpose, and meat fowls. It will be well first to describe these classes, as type is a factor in the profitable feeding of poultry, as well as of other classes of animals. If the farmer wishes hens which will lay the greatest number of eggs in a year from the least amount of food, he will find it well to choose one of the laying breeds. These are called the Mediterranean class, because typical birds are supposed to have come originally from the Medi- - terranaen coast. If he desires fowls which will fur- nish more meat and which will, also, with the right kind of treatment, lay many eggs, it will be better for him to select one of the general-purpose breeds. But if his chief object is meat, then one from the Asiatic class will best suit his purpose. Class I. Laying, or Mediterranean, Breeds.— It is the active, sprightly, alert hen that lays the most eggs—the one first out in the morn- ing and the one last on the roost at night. Of these Mediterranean birds, the Leghorn and the Minorca are most popular. The Minorca lays a larger egg than the Leghorn. The White and Buff Leghorns, some Leghorn breeders claim, lay larger eggs than the other varieties. However that may be, the Leghorn—Black, Buff, Brown or White—as bred today, lays a much larger egg than the Leghorn of a decade or two ago. The White-faced Black Spanish lays a large white egg, but this fowl is not so popular as formerly, probably because the Mi- norca, which has Spanish blood in its veins, has crowded the older bird from its place. Here, too, the Andalusian and the Hamburg may be men- tioned, for-they have been tried as egg producers 312 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. and have not been found wanting. The former is a beautiful bird, 1f one has not the waning Ameri- can prejudice against white skin and dark shanks; and the latter in its different varieties is worthy ot its many admirers. The egg of the Hamburg is smaller than that of the Leghorn. As these fowls cate } Re mh oe weg OE WR GE NG CRN a SE Rat ae ae ~ Ves patty l ith / 1 Laying Type Single Comb Brown Leghorns. are so-called ‘“‘non-sitters,” the farmer who has them must either use incubators or keep some of the broody types for sitters and mothers. The lat- ter may easily be done by selecting from Classes II and III hens which lay brown eggs, since the eges of these Mediterranean fowls are pure white. Class II. Of the general-purpose breeds, the Plymouth Rocks are the oldest and best known. Many people prefer the Barred to the Buff or White Plym- outh Rock, because of the beauty and oddity of the TYPES OF FOWLS. BLS plumage. The Wyandotte, a bird in many respects similar to the Plymouth Rock, leans perhaps a trifle more toward the egg-producing type. Though there is no Barred species here, there are many beautiful varieties to choose from, as the Silver- laced, Golden-laced, Black, White, and Buff. Color is, however, more a matter of individual taste than anything else, though there may at any time be strains of one color or variety of a breed superior to General-purpose Type—Single Comb Buff Orpingtons. strains of some other color or variety. The Rhode Island Reds and the Orpingtons are among the newest of this class, and they are proving them- selves splendid utility fowls. Of the Orpingtons, the Buff seems to be the favorite in America, though the White and the Black are beautiful birds, the latter being thought by some to be _ hardier than the others. Hens from this class are good sit- ters and excellent mothers. 314 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING, Class III. Meat Fowls, also Called Asiatic.— These are the largest of “all iowls:— To sie group belong the Brahmas, the Langshans and the Cochins.. These birds are gentle and tame, very pleasant to handle, and with proper care the pullets and young hens will produce many eggs; yet this very docility and sluggishness of disposi- tion make them less prolific egg producers than the smaller and more active breeds. They will, however, dress more pounds for the market. The Meat Type—Partridge Cochins. flesh is juicy and sweet, and in some localities near our large cities, especially those of the Eastern sea- board, birds of this class are very profitable. These fowls are by natural disposition good sitters and mothers, but their great size, with its consequent awkwardness, sometimes interferes with their value in this respect. There is, however, no better moth- er in “chickendom” than a good Cochin, Brahma, or Langshan hen or half-breed. CHAPTER XXXI. RALSING LITTLE CHICKS: When to Set the Eggs.—It is, of course, the rais- ing of the little chicks that forms the foundation of our success with poultry. To get good winter layers we must set the eggs at the proper time, whether we use for this purpose incubators or hens. It is from the pullets that the greatest number of win- ter eggs are to come. They must be hatched so they will be ready to begin laying in November or early December. Pullets from Class I should begin laying irom 4% to 5% months from time of hatching; from Class 1 6-to 7 months: from. Class III,7 to 8 months. It will be seen that the larger Asiatic fowls, to lay in winter, must be hatched earlier in the spring than the more rapidly maturing Mediter- ranean and general-purpose breeds. This is an argument in favor of these latter classes for the farm, for the weather is apt to be damp and cold in the early spring and the farmer has*not time to take the extra precaution necessary to make these early hatches a success. Sitting Hens.—On many farms incubators are now used for hatching chickens, and the directions coming with the machines are so complete that nothing need be said on that subject. But the ma- jority of farmers still rely on the faithful old hen to do the incubating. Where such is the case it is much more satisfactory to keep sitting hens by themselves during the period of incubation. Some building not in use in the summer—a corn crib or granary will answer very well—may easily be con- 315 316 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. verted into a model incubating room. New, clean nest-boxes may be ranged along the wall in one, two, or even three tiers. A sod should be cut and put in the bottom of the box, or dirt to the depth of two or three inches, and the nest of fine hay or straw or leaves laid on this, plentifully sprinkled with insect powder. This sod or earth should be dampened several times during incubation. This » imitates Nature’s plan of a nest upon the ground, and is especially beneficial during a dry _ season. 3roody hens should be taken from their nests after dark and put in these boxes on dummy eggs. Or, if nest-boxes are hung on pegs or nails in the hen- houses, these may be removed without disturbing the hens and hung on pegs in the room for in- cubation. The hens may be fastened in for a day or two, if thought best, and inspected once or twice a day afterward to see that all. nests are “covered; wr the “house ~mayeene made dark and opened only for feeding, ete. At one of the state experiment stations a double nest is used in a house of this kind, the eggs being put in the nest behind. The hen is fastened in with a little lattice gate. If she becomes restless before the time comes to let her and her companions out for their food, she stands by the little gate and her eggs are in no danger of being broken. Besides good, wholesome food and fresh, clean water, the hens in this house must be provided with dust-box, grit, oyster shell and char- coal. Chickens when hatched may be taken from some of these hens and given to others, the hens be- ing reset if they are in*good condition, with red combs, bright eyes, and smooth, glossy plumage. The straw should be burned in the nest occasionally to make sure there are no mites, and the hens should be thoroughly dusted with insect powder every S RAISING LITTLE CHICKS. 317 week during incubation that the little chicks may leave the nest free of lice. Shelter for Chicks——Whether hatches are early or late, provision must be made for dry quar- ters for young chicks, though the risk is not so ereat with later hatches, because the weather 1s warmer and they will not need to be confined so long. Damp- ness, too hot or too cold brooders, and lack of fresh air and sunshine are among the chief causes of mor- tality among these fluffy little creatures. If incu- Framework of Colony Brooder House, built by students at Cornell University, Ithaca, N. Y. bators and brooders are used, brooder houses must be provided. If hens are to brood the young, they must have large, dry, clean coops where they can be shut in and the little fellows made contented on those long, rainy days that invariably come in the spring. If the small, old-fashioned coops are used, they may be put in some barn or under some dry shed until the weather is settled or until the chickens are 318 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING, old enough to go to the hen-house to roost. With most breeds it is entirely practical to have coops or houses built large enough to accommodate several hens with broods of from fifteen to twenty chicks each. If all are taken off the nests about the same time and are kept together from the first, the hens will usually live together very amicably. This does away with the inconvenience and annoyance aris- ing from trying to drive stubborn old biddies into little coops at night. They seem to like these larger, lighter, more inviting places, and go into them of their own accord. Plenty of fresh air and light are admitted by using I-inch mesh wire net- ting in the front. The chicks learn very early to seek refuge from storms in these comfortable places, and need almost no looking after when showers come up. There are often, too, in summer time on a farm, empty barns or stables in which little chicks may be “started,” and if these places are not needed, the chickens may continue to roost in them until fall. Lit- tle chicks raised about the barns usually grow rapidly and seem to thrive. They are seldom or never troubled with bronchitis or catarrh or colds of any kind. If the hens are confined in the barns with them for a week_or so—the length of time depending on the weather—they will usually come to the barn to be fed at meal time, and are very little trouble. Care should be taken to see that barn chickens are sup- plied with plenty of pure water, lest they learn to drink from pools in the barnyard. Remedy for Colds.—Little chicks, through ex- posure, often contract colds which cause them to sneeze frequently or to breathe with difficulty. All such cases should be treated as soon as possible. A few drops of kerosene oil injected into the nose and throat with a medicine dropper will usually bring im- mediate relief, and one or two treatments will effect ‘WOTZRIS JUSMPIodx|Y ouyeyY ‘esnoy Jspooag Auojop 319 320 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. a cure, if the cause is removed and the bird is in a thrifty condition otherwise. Care should be taken not to use for breeding stock chickens that have been thus affected. The disease is not roup and is not, perhaps, in this form contagious, but a bird might transmit the tendency, which in some future generation under certain conditions might develop into roup. In poultry raising “an ounce of preven- tion” is sometimes worth many pounds of cure. Lice on Little Chicks.—Should there be any of these pests, either the big head-lice or those that in- fest the body, chicks should be dipped in some good sheep dip or lightly greased on head and throat, on the tail bone, about the vent, and under the wings with fresh lard or carbolized vaseline or sweet oil, to which may be added one or two drops of carbolic acid to 100 drops of oil, or sassafras oil in the proportion of one ounce of the sassafras to six ounces of the sweet oil. The little fellows should then be put in some quiet, shady place. Un- der no consideration should young poultry of any kind be subjected to the hot sun after being greased on the head. For this reason the greasing would better be done at night. Chicks must be examined once a week, and if there are lice—and one must look thoroughly—no pains must be spared to get rid of them. While some kind of grease seems to be the most effectual remedy for the lice on head ana throat, insect powder is quite sufficient for the body lice. Often all that will be necessary is to dust the mother hen occasionally or put a little grease under her wings. If this is not sufficient, then the chicks should be taken one at a time and dipped or greased or thoroughly dusted with powder. The best remedy for lice, however, as for contagious in- digestion or any other disease in the poultry yard is absolute cleanliness about the coops and grounds, RAISING LITTLE CHICKS. 321 with disinfectants used frequently. A_ pail of water containing crude carbolic acid and copperas makes a cheap and satisfactory disinfectant. White- wash containing crude carbolic acid or salt is ex- cellent, especially if applied hot. ‘“Zenoleum,” Lam- bert’s “Death to Lice,’ Lee’s “Louse Killer,” and other preparations on the market are convenient and give good resuits. Feeding Little Chicks.——F ood should not be given little chicks within at least twenty-four hours from time of hatching. Some poultry men do not feed for seventy-two hours. The reason for this is, of course, that Nature has provided a means of sustenance for the young chick until he has strength to help himself, by causing the ab- sorption, through the navel into the abdomen, of a portion of the egg designed for the purpose. There are two methods of feeding little chickens: one, moist food; the other, dry food. Each has its ad- vantages. 1. Dry Food.—There is, perhaps, less mortality among these tiny infants when dry food is fed, espe- cially if the season is wet. There are excellent foods upon the market consisting of a variety of whole- some grains, which may be used by the farmer to start his chicks. These mixed grains, with milk to drink and meat scraps occasionally, make a balanced ration upon which little chicks will thrive and grow. The farmer can make a mixture of grains himself, of rolled or pinhead oats, cracked wheat, barley, buck- wheat, cracked corn (Kafir corn is considered best for small chicks), millet, hemp, and other small seeds. In a short time the wheat may be given whole—screen- ings are good for half-grown chickens—the oats simply hulled, and the corn more coarsely cracked. The necessity of variety in the food of little chicks is not, as a usual thing, considered as important upon 322 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. the farm’as it really is. Any one food, however excel- lent in itself, if fed exclusively or in excess, will cause indigestion in young poultry. Hence, farmers who can not conveniently prepare this variety will find. it economy as well as a convenience to try the food prepared by persons who understand the nutritive values of various foodstuffs. 2. Moist Food.—When bread and milk is fed, it may be either bread from the table, well soaked and at least twenty-four hours old, or “Johnny cake’ made for the purpose. The bread is simply crumbled, or dipped for an instant in milk and then squeezed dry. It must be crumbly, never “sloppy” nor sticky. To this may be added two or three times a week meat scraps or hard boiled eggs—eggs di- gestible and mealy, not, tough and leathery. These may be put through a vegetable or meat grinder, shell and all. A raw egg may be beaten in the milk in which the bread is moistened. This is especially desir- able in» damp, cold weather, when bowel trouble is to be feared. At such times it is well, no doubt, to some- times add a pinch of ginger or red or black pepper. Cottage cheese is an excellent food to give either chickens or turkeys occasionally, but not as a “steady diet.” Cooked rice is also wholesome. If bread is to be baked especially for the chicks, the following recipe is excellent : 2 quarts of bran. 2 quarts of coarse corn meal. 1 quart of wheat middlings, or shorts. 1 handful of good pure beef scrap, 1 handful of good chicken grit. “Rub together dry with from two to four infertile eggs. Mix with barely enough skim milk to moisten it, and rub the whole into a moist, crumbly mass with the hands, then put in a well-greased pan (a roasting pan about three inches deep is the best) and press RAISING LITTLE CHICKS, 323 down hard to stick the cake together. Bake in a slow oven for three to six hours. This makes an easily- crumbled cake, and, when properly prepared, should have no stickiness or doughiness about it.” Some- times a bread of this sort is made without the grit, then broken and put in the oven where it is dried out. It is then put through a vegetable grinder and fed dry or moistened with milk. The heat has converted the starch into sugar and has made the food very digestible. As grain must very early become a part of the little chick’s ration if it is to grow up a strong bird with good healthy digestion, it is well to have on hand a mixture of small and cracked grains similar to that recommended for the dry food chick to feed once or twice a day after the first few days. Lit- tle chicks fed in this way—especially if they are with the hen and have plenty of exercise—if care is taken to feed regularly, and not to overfeed, will grow with wonderful rapidity. Grit.——The importance of grit must not be over- looked from the start. Grit in the gizzard of the young chick is as necessary for the proper digestion of its food as teeth are in the mouth of the young calf when he receives his first ration of grain. In the one case, Nature has already provided the means for mastication ; in the other, it must be sought. Those poultry raisers who think they can get more rapid gains by making bread and milk a part of the daily ration for the young chick make the first feed in the morning bread and milk and sprinkle grit upon it every morning for the first ten days or two weeks. Many who advocate and use the dry foods, fearing the little things will not pick up enough of the grit scattered in the litter with their food, for the very first feed give bread and milk with grit in this way. The grit should be either sharp sand or crushed $24 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. rock. Farmers will find it profitable to buy a sack of No. 1 chick size grit early in the season before the first hatch comes off, that this ingredient, which Nature in her plan has made a necessity for the ° bird family, shall be within reach at all times. It is well to be provided with No. 2, also, for the half- grown chickens, and later with the largest size, No. 3, for grown fowls. Green Food.—We know, of course, that little chicks to ‘‘do well’? must have some tender, succulent green food. On a farm where they have the run of blue grass yards and orchards, and clover and alfal- fa meadows, this point needs no emphasis; but should they for any reason be deprived of this, the lack must be supplied. They should be fed blades of. grass or sprouted grain, leaves of clover or al- falfa, or something from the garden like lettuce or cabbage. Overfeeding.—The subject of ‘feeding young chickens must not be dismissed without a word of earnest warning against the error of overfeeding. Irregularity and overfeeding, as well as dampness . and lice, have sometimes worked sad havoc in our flocks of little chickens. A safe rule to follow in feeding chickens, as in feeding the growing young of all animals, is never to feed at any time so much but that they would gladly eat a little more. When we find our flock of young birds indifferent to our call when feeding time comes, then our troubles are begun. After the little things are nicely started, say four or five weeks old, there is not the danger to be feared from overfeeding. After that time, one may keep food in racks to which the young chick- ens may go whenever they like. These racks are very convenient, and the farmer’s wife wants many such things made during the winter when work is “slack.” They may be made of slats or wire net- RAISING LITTLE CHICKS. 325 ting so arranged as to prevent the hens and older fowls from getting in. A rack four feet square is a convenient size. Preserveauaus the former way it may be fed raw or cooked; in the latter it should be freshened and then slowly cooked. On farms where there is skim milk in plenty, no more economical use can be made of it than by using it in any mashes that may be made for the hens, and by giving it to them to drink. In winter it should be warmed. Green Food.—In the fall when the farmer is filling his cellar with good things for winter use, let him not forget the staunch little friends in the hen- house. They dearly love cabbage. Let them have all the loose, unfilled heads and, if there are not enough of those, some of the sound ones. They ought to have, cabbage twice a week and onions oc- casionally, but neither cabbage nor onions often enough to “flavor” the eggs. Beets of all kinds— sugar beets, garden beets, mangel-wurzels—are ex- cellent for hens. Give them all the vegetable trim- mings from the kitchen. There is little in this line they cannot be trained to eat. If apples are plenti- ful and cheap, cut up apples for them sometimes, as well as save for them all parings. They will rel- ish potato skins in winter for variety better raw than cooked, and will take some potatoes whole, CARE OF HENS IN WINTER. 341 too, if there are plenty. If you have silos, be sure to carry to the hen-house two or three times a week heaping pans of corn silage, and watch the hens devour’it. But the foods “par excellence” for hens in winter are clover and alfalfa. Alfalfa contains a higher percentage of protein than clover, but both are rich in this egg-producing element. A good plan is to scrape up the leaves and litter from the floor of the barns, and either feed it dry or steam it and feed it in a mash with ground oats and corn, bran and shorts. Cut clover or alfalfa may also be fed in this way. Little racks may be made in the hen-houses, in which alfalfa or clover hay may be fed the same as to other stock. Clover and alfalfa may be given in the form of meal, if one cares to go Double House with Scratching Shed. to the trouble and expense of buying meal or having it ground. It is really not an expensive food when we consider how far a little alfalfa or clover meal goes, but it hardly seems necessary for the farmer to do this; when he has it so abundantly, there is no harm done if a,few stems are wasted. In regard to the manner of feeding, poultrymen do not agree. Some think it best to feed mash once a day, others think they get sufficiently good re- sults with feeding it three or four times a week. Some claim it is best in winter to feed this mash the first thing in the morning, not giving so much but that the hens will scratch in the litter for grain; others feed the hot mash late in the afternoon. Excellent 342 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. results may be obtained from feeding thus: grain in the litter in the morning, a mash at noon three times a week containing animal protein, on other days corn silage, or raw potatoes, apples, sliced beets, cab- bages, or some such food—with clean clover or alfalfa within reach at all times; and, for a last feed at night, ear-corn broken in pieces an inch or two long. This seems a practical plan for the farmer, as there is seldom an extra hand who can take time to stir mashes early in the morning or late in the after- noon. All mashes for chickens should be salted. _While salt m excess is a rank poison to them, they need: a little of -this “minerals It 1s Signime cant that nearly all condimental poultry foods contain common salt. There is no harm in adding “a pinch -of black» or “red ~peppermeen ginger occasionally to supply the lack of certain ele- ments they get from seeds and weeds in summer. See to it that the supply of grit, sand, oyster shell and charcoal is never omitted, and if the very best results are to be obtained ground bone should be within reach at all times. Self-feeding hoppers with compartments for the different ingredients may be bought of the supply houses or made at home, keeping the foods clean and preventing waste. Water for Hens in Winter.—But with all the precautions we may take and the care we may ex- pend on our hens, they will not lay in winter if they are stinted in their supply of that cheapest of all ma- terials—water. The farmer who relies on his hens go- ing out to get water from the tank where. the horses drink, or to the trough where the pigs feed, will be sadly disappointed if he expects to get eggs in winter. Sixty-six per cent of the egg is water, and the hen, besides needing water to make the egg, needs it to keep her own body in good condition. The best rule undoubtedly is to fill all water fountains with warm. CARE OF HENS IN WINTER. 343 water the first thing in the morning—and when they are empty to fill again. When the last rounds are made at night any water remaining in the dishes should be thrown out. The most satisfactory ves- sels for watering grown fowls are the wall foun- tains which can now be obtained at the poultry supply houses. When one thinks of the time and steps saved in having such a convenience the ques- Interior of inexpensive house, showing dust-bath, hoppers for oyster shell, grit, ete. Courtesy Mr. Clarence Ward, Chicago. tion of expense is nothing. These fountains in the large size hold two gallons, and are so constructed that the wattles of high-combed birds cannot get in the water, thus lessening the risk of* freezing these pendulous ornaments. The water does not get dirty, and if the fountain is hung back in the house out of the wind, it does not freeze. In win- ter, as in moulting season, a little tonic may be given sometimes in the drinking water, Little Danger from Disease.—If there is no 344 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. draught on the fowls at night, and they are kept busy during the day in a well-ventilated scratching pen, there will be no catarrh or roup. If they have a good dust bath in a sunny spot, with plent of clean grit and pure water, there will be few, if any, cases of ia- digestion. If there should be cases of such from greediness on the part of the hen or overfeeding on the part of the attendant, a dose of castor oil, sweet oil or Epsom salts given at once with patient shut away from food for from twenty-four to thirty-six hours, and then fed lightly on nutritious food, will often effect a speedy and permanent cure. Some- times, simply shutting away from food for a period will produce a cure. However, if a case of indiges- tion is not attended to as soon as observed, the hatchet is, as a rule, the only practical remedy to be applied, as hens have little power of resistance when a disease is once seated. America Deficient in System.—Notwithstanding the fact that the product of the hen in the United States for 1900 was estimated at $290,000,000, we are as yet but in the a-b-c stage of the poultry indus- try. The possibilities before us in this fortunate land are almost limitless. Nor must those of us interested in the growth of this industry rest until we have secured for our country such a system as ob- tains in some foreign countries today, most notably Denmark. It is a hopeful sign that in the best grocer- ies of our inland cities, as well as in those of the Eastern and Western seaboards, eggs are now to be - found stamped with the name of the producer and the date on which they were laid. May the time be not far distant in this great America, when eggs shall be bought and sold by weight and the man who puts upon the market an-egg of inferior quality shall render ‘himself liable to a fine, thus removing the temptation to sell undersized, underflavored or CARE OF HENS IN WINTER. 345 ill-flavored eggs. When this is true, our brethren of the cities will cheerfuly pay choice prices for eggs, because they are getting an article “of guaranteed weight, freshness, and flavor,” and we, whose part it is to furnish such eggs, shall find in this appreciation of our efforts’ an incentive to put upon the market the best that can be produced. Interior arrangement in Poultry House and students feeding fowls, Cornell University, Ithaca, N. Y. CHAPTER XXXIV. TURKEYS AND GUINEAS: Turkey raising, in former years a source of pleas- ure and profit to many farmers, has recently become unpopular. Some of our most experienced turkey raisers, becoming discouraged through numerous losses, have given up the growing of turkeys—for the present at least. It is well that the alarm be sounded ; for, unless something is done to restore to this bird sufficient vigor of constitution to enable it to withstand the attacks of the dread disease which is depleting our flocks in the West and Middle West—as well as in New England and the East— the plump form of the turkey in a few years will cease to grace our Thanksgiving table. If we would save to America the beautiful bird which has been a part of her history since the days of the earliest settlers, we must discover wherein our error lies, and remedy it, if remedy is within our power. Cause of Diminished Vitality.—Is it that we have failed to understand the nature of this shy bird of the forest and have attempted domestication where domestication is impossible, or have we, in disregarding the laws of selection and_ breeding, laid the foundation of this deadly germ disease, hepatitis, or “blackhead,” as it is more commonly called? The fact that turkeys kept upon large tracts of land where the conditions are as nearly as possible like the conditions of the free and in- dependent wild turkey, from which the so-called “domestic turkey” originally sprung, have failed to contract the disease, even when inoculated with 346 TURKEYS AND GUINEAS. 347 the germs, goes to prove that domestication has had something to do with undermining the con- stitution of the turkey. Then, too, we have known for years that inbreeding could not with safety be _ practiced with turkeys, and yet neighbors in a com- munity would find, if the lineage of the turkeys in their flock could be traced, that sometimes all the turkeys of the neighborhood are more or less re- lated. To exchange “gobblers,” or to buy one a few miles distant, or even to go without one, rely- ing upon the service of a neighbor’s tom, has often been deemed a quite sufficient introduction of ‘new blood.” More than this, turkey raisers have too often been indifferent to the importance of select- ing for breeders mature birds—the proudest and handsomest of the flock, as well as the most vigor- ous and healthy. Too often the undersized, the late hatched pullets or toms—such as could not be sold for profit at market time—have been left over to be used next year for breeding purposes. It may be, too, that the fanciers have erred in the opposite direction, and in breeding for size and beauty have sometimes lost sight of the fact that stamina is a far more important quality. A Serious Problem.—Whether any one of faces mistakes, or all of them, or some error not yet dis- covered, has been the means of the turkey’s un- doing, one fact remains clear and undisputed, and that is that turkey raisers are confronted with a most serious problem. It is only by the co-operation of experiment stations and government officials with turkey raisers and farmers, together with the passage of laws of strict governmental inspection, that we may hope to gain the upper hand of a dis- ease which, while it may not be a menace to the health of our people, because it is said not to be communicable to human beings, yet threatens dire 348 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. disaster to this important branch of the poultry in- dustry. Investigations in Rhode Island.—Because we are still young in the West and our experiment stations are not, for the most part, equipped with facilities for experimentation in this line of work, it may be well to call the attention of Western farmers to the work done in the East, especially at the Rhode Island Experiment Station, where investigations with this disease have been carried forward now Cecum, or “blind gut,” of Liver of turkey affected with turkey affected with hepatitis. Spots indi- hepatitis. cate dead tissue. for more than ten years. That farmers may recog- nize the disease when it appears in their flocks, illustrations from photographs made by the Rhode Island Station, showing the diseased appearance of the organs primarily concerned in the malady, are given herewith, and the following description is quoted from the official report of that Station made in 1894: “The disease apparently first attacks the cecum, or pronged part of the lower bowel, which event- TURKEYS AND GUINEAS. 349 ually becomes thickened and enlarged, and often hadly ulcerated. The liver is next affected, be- comes spotted and in advanced stages is covered with circular yellowish areas, showing destruction of tissue within the organ. The disease attacks young turkeys at all ages and gradually develops. More turkeys succumb to it in the latter part of July and early part of August, and at the approach of cold weather in the fall, than at any other time. Diseased birds seem to be able to hold out against it during the warm, dry weather, but are quickly overcome in wet, stormy weather. Affected birds usually have a diarrhoeal discharge, their feathers become rough, and the head looks pinched and turns dark or purple.” Regarding these symptoms, however, there are instances of birds, which when examined after death did not possess a vital organ that was not either al- most wasted away or else “one mass of corruption,” whose feathers to the last were as smooth and _ glossy as those of an exhibition bird, and the head presented no unnatural appearance. In fact, so in- sidious is the disease in its progress, especially in older birds, that oftentimes those unacquainted with it would not notice anything wrong until the very last stages were reached. To the careful observer, however, two symptoms are apparent sooner or later—these are loss of appetite and diarrhceal dis- charge. Precautions Necessary.—Most urgent is the need to warn all turkey raisers against allowing a bird to remain in the flock an instant after a suspicion is‘aroused that it is ailing. Let all such be strictly quarantined or killed immediately. Let post mor- tem examinations be made in every instance, and the bodies of infected birds deeply buried or burned. The remainder of the flock should be removed at 350 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. once to uninfected ground, and the old run left unoccupied by turkeys for at least two years. In case this cannot be done, the wisest plan will un- doubtedly be to dispose of the stock as soon as pos- sible, and a few years later—when the wind and the rain, the frost, the sunshine, and the plow have ren- dered the soil pure once more—to begin again with new. stock, new ideas, new enthusiasm—to achieve, it is to be hoped, complete success. Profit in Turkeys.—Those who are in localities where “blackhead”’ is not known will, beyond ques- tion, find immense profit in turkeys. There is no animal upon the farm which returns such profits as the turkey when sold at ordinary prices, and we may now lock for prices quite beyond the ordinary. . If allowed to roam during the day, as is most con- sistent with their nature, besides gaining most of their livelihood themselves they will destroy mul- titudes of injurious insects. Large flocks of tur- keys have been kept by ranchmen and farmers in the West for this purpose alone. This is indeed the ideal way of raising turkeys. We do not repose the confidence in the turkey mother that she de- serves. She can, as a usual thing, raise her turkeys far better herseif than we can do it for her. It is doubtless wise in localities where there are wild animals, like polecats and coyotes, to teach the old turkeys to bring the young ones home at night to roost near the house or barn, that they may be un- der the eye of the good dog, which should be the faithful night-watch on every farm where poultry is kept. By driving turkeys to a certain place at a particular time on several successive days, they can easily be taught to come to this place at this time every day for food. By this plan the owner can keep some account of his flocks, and they are not likely to wander so far away from home, TURKEYS AND GUINEAS. 351 Feeding.—-While much has been said in former years about proper and improper systems of feed- ing, we cannot under existing circumstances rec- ommend any particular method of feeding turkeys, as we now know that the character of the food given has not been the chief cause of mortality among them, as has so long been maintained. Perhaps the old man was nearest right, after all, who, when asked to explain the reason of his success with tur- keys, said he reckoned it was because all the time he spent with them was when he clubbed them away from home. It is, at any rate, far better to feed young turkeys too little than too much. On pleasant days twice a day—morning and late after- noon—is doubtless often enough to feed poults ranging with their mothers. On stormy days they may be fed again at noon if they can be found con- veniently. After they are four or five weeks old, if insects are plentiful and there are clover, alfalfa, or grain fields in which to roam, the morning feed may be omitted. As market time approaches, the feeding periods may be increased again to two or even three times a day. Character of Food.—What has been said on the subject of foods for ‘chicks will apply to poults. A variety of wholesome food and grains is far better than any one food, however good it may xe in itself, though turkeys having range will over- come a deficiency of this sort by procuring variety for themselves. Little turkeys are fond of bread crumbs, bread moistened with milk, hard boiled eggs, or cottage cheese, of rolled or pin-head oats, cracked wheat and corn. Millet seed, an ex- cellent food for chicks, is said not to agree with poults. Turkeys are not usually so fond of corn as of oats and wheat. The latter grains are better for growing turkeys, but at market time corn puts 352 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. on the “gilt edge,’ and it is well to gradually in- crease the proportion of corn until during the last few weeks of their career it forms a large part of the ration. Grit, etc—If for any reason it is thought best to confine little turkeys until they are “strong on their legs, care must be taken to supply plenty net eS ii ah aii AN Pair of Mammoth Bronze Turkeys. of fresh water and grit, either good sharp sand or the commercial grit. Turkeys, old and young, are extremely fond of oyster shells, and it must be that they do not get enough lime on range, in some lo- calities, or they would not crave it. dt is well to keep a dish of this, as well as one of charcoal, at TURKEYS AND GUINEAS. 353 the feeding place, and water must be provided if there are no springs or brooks in the fields where they are accustomed to go. Standard Varieties.—As to variety, the Mammoth Bronze is probably the favorite, though the other varieties—the Narragansett, Buff, Slate, White, and Black—each has its admirers and supporters. That any one of these is less subject to disease than the others: is not thus far known. © The Bronze contains more wild blood than the others and is more shy in its habits. All are beau- tiful birds, worthy of the post of honor on the table at the annual feast a nation celebrates to express its gratitude for past favors and continued oppor- tunity, and we must not, if human intelligence can save them, allow them to pass from our midst. Guineas.—Few meats are more delicious and dainty, even when prairie chicken and quail figure in the comparison, than the flesh of the young guinea. As turkeys become high priced and the flavor of these gamy birds is better known and ap- preciated, there will be a growing demand for them and a consequently higher price. They are less dif- ficult to raise than turkeys, if their habits are un- derstood and the wild instincts they still retain are in a measure respected: Some, it is true, object to their “noise”; but to others the cock’s shrill note of alarm, or the hen’s cheerful “buckwheat, buck- wheat,” is pleasing rather than otherwise. Hatching.—Guineas are prolific layers in spring and summer, and, while the very first eggs are apt to be infertile, there will be severai sittings of fer- tile eggs before Mistress Guinea herself thinks of becoming broody. These may be hatched and raised by fowls. Hens usually make good mothers for little guineas, and the affection these little things show their adopted mothers would be pathetic if 354 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. the hens did not respond, which, be it said to the hens’ credit, they nearly always do. Guineas, when hatched by hens, must be in nests deep enough and tight enough to prevent their getting out and being lost. For several days after they are taken off the nest they must be confined in a coop with a tight yard. Until they learn to have confidence in their mother and in the human being who takes care of them, they are the shyest little creatures in the world, and if frightened will run away and perish. After a few days they may be allowed to go out with their foster-mother, if she is a good, quiet, careful hen, and soon they will be almost no trouble at all. It is better, when it can be done, to put guineas in a different yard from the chickens and let them range in a different direction. Some- tiines the old guineas annoy hens having little gutn- eas. A good-sized stick will soon bring them to an understanding of the situation. Food.—Dry food is better for little guineas than moist food, though they like bread crumbs and hard boiled eggs sometimes for variety. Mashes for young guineas will very soon bring on appendicitis. Feeds similar to Cypher’s “Chick Food,” or a col- jection of cracked grains and small seeds, such as > were recommended for chicks, are the best foods fer these birds. We must be careful not to overfeed, for these are active little creatures, and soon are quite able to fill their little craws with insects. Like turkeys, they earn the most of their living, but un- like turkeys, inbreeding and domestication have not apparently detracted from a naturally vigorous con- stitution. Guineas, thus brought up, upon becom- ing parents themselves, are usually so tame that they will bring their young to the yard once or twice © a day .to be: fed, and very. grateiul- the plies things seem for a bit of food, However, when TURKEYS AND GUINEAS. 355 the parents are wild and show a decided preference to be let alone, it is quite as well to let them have their way. When cold weather sets in, they will bring their flocks to the barn-yard, but these will never become so friendly as guineas hatched by fowls or by guineas which are themselves compara- tively tame. FEEDING, K Cc PROFITABLE STO ‘g0UBA ‘aqodad ul sivgsddy off se UOT[[VIG WOtsqoI9q IL PART VII HORSES CHAPTER XXXV. TYPES OF HORSES.—SUMMER FEEDING FOR WORK. While cattle have been used in the past as beasts of burden, the horse is now almost entirely relied upon for the production of all kinds of work, be it drawing a loaded wagon, an implement of tillage, « road vehicle, or carrying a load upon the*back. For the most economical performance of these dilfer- ent kinds of work, horses have been bred and devel- oped along rather distinct and well defined lines. Just as the freight traffic upon our railroads calls for an engine built for heavy hauls and the passenger service calls for one built for high speed—neither engine be- ing adapted for the work of the other—so the draft horse has been developed for strength and the roadster for speed, each being well adapted for its particular service only. Horses, then, are classified in a gen- eral way as drafters and roadsters; there are many gradations between, which for convenience are grouped into one intermediate type, called the coach, or general-purpose, horse. The draft horse, which includes such well-known breeds as the Percheron, English Shire, Clydesdaie and Belgian, is built massively to procure weight and muscular strength. Without weight a horse is unable to cling to the ground under the strain of a 357 358 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. - heavy pull, when there is always a tendency for the feet to slip back. The driver who transferred from his overloaded wagon one sack of wheat to each horse’s back recognized this and. profited by it. A horse could hardly be classed as a drafter without possessing a weight of at least 1,500 pounds. Stallions of the draft breeds frequently weigh as high as 2,200 pounds. In conformation the draft horse, briefly described, should be broad and deep in-chest to give strong lung power; broad and well muscled over back, loin and hips; rather short and closely coupled in body to give strength; and short rather than long in the legs to give greater purchase on the load. The following score card for draft horses, by Craig in “Judging Live Stock,” gives the desirable type in-détail: SCALE OF POINTS FOR DRAFT HORSES— GELDING. Perfect Score. General appearance: Weight, over 1500 pounds. Seore according to age.... 4 Form, broad, massive, low set, proportioned.......... 4 Quality, bone clean, yet indicating sufficient substance; tendons idistinet=) skinwand har sfine naira nian 4 Temperament, energetic, good disposition............++. 4 Head and neck: Head, ‘lean, medium Size). .). Sick oie esate orate oli ee i: Muzzle, fine, nostrils large, lips thin, even............. 1 Eyes, full, “bright, clear, large. 02.0% «10. wees «clei 1 Forehead, broad, fill tc cisiecs saree cretete'agelt wher eee 1 Harss medaume size. well carried) -c-rrevererslcr)elsiers ciorenrneaats 1 Neck, muscled; crest high; throatlatch fine, windpipe VUE OO eae a nt ol cietonietieve ned etayeaestusievaverseisienet suekelost= sess Mat t= ek onan Forequarters: Shoulders, sloping, smooth, snug, extending into back.... 2 Arm. (short, throws forwards cms sere she aper-todalsielleletstel-ietenenene 1 Forearm, heavily muscled, long, wide..........++eeeees 2 TYPES OF HORSES. 359 Knees, wide, clean cut, straight, deep, strongly sup- POTLEUS leita neal wtopecam aeldauans o/es)s k's wins sims oe eee cs Se Cannons, short, lean, mies tendons large, set back...... Fetlocks, wide, straight, strong sy erieacto SoS mncre cD DORIC Pasterns, sloping, Gn gthy, SLR OTE es he ohn. gener CDi ce Feet, large, even size, straight; horn dense; dark color; sole concave; bars strong; frog large, elastic; heel wide, high, one-half length of toe...............06- Legs, viewed in front, a perpendicular line from eee point of the shoulder should fall upon the center of the knee, cannon, pastern and foot. From the side, a per- pendicular line dropping from the center of the elbow joint should fall upon the center of the knee and pastern joints and back of hoof...............+-+- Body: .- Chest,.deep, wide, large girth. ............+-s see eeeees ADS lon GlOSes SPEUNO ctcrcle is cies eves alae sare ete Back, straight, short, broad... .......5.0ceseeseeceeee Loin, wide, short, thick, straight................++eeee Underline, Hank LOW, <..:066 0650 cece ae eee et scene Ae Hindquarters: Hips, SMOOth, Wide... is eee eeen ce wee ce wees “seat se Croup, long, wide, muscular. .......c.5 pens elec ee eens Tail, attached «high, well carried. )..i....05 2% 0 Se cesses MIRE AHS PANCHNAL «oe igie a ayaa wns opereie ele Poorest ahs we ehem clase does Quarters. deep, heavily muscled. .22. 5... 2.2.2 a2. Gens, Gaskins, or Lower Thighs, wide, muscled............... Hocks, clean cut, wide, straight...........0..-.--..-5- Cannons, short, wide; tendons large, set back........... Weockd se Wide! StrAiehe, SiLON I «5% ici w syalsiem ere os es ose Pasterns, sloping, strong, lengthy. «/.)..<..'0/o22< 5 eee =<. Feet, large, even size; straight; horn dense, dark color; sole concave; bars strong; frog large, elastic; heel wide, high, one- half LESAN ONE MNO gd oe Gb cinoo de anne ce me meron Legs. Viewed from behind, a perpendicular line from the point of the buttock should fall upon the center of the hock, cannon, pastern and foot. From the side, a perpendicular line from the hip joint should fall upon the center of the foot and divide the gaskin in the mid- dle; and a perpendicular line from the point of the but- tock should run parallel with the line of the cannon.. Action: Walk, smooth, quick.-long, balanced. ...2.............- Trot, rapid, siraiehs, regular... 5) oe Pe ee. ool 3 Pere k 4 360 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. The roadster type, including such horses as the American trotter, English Thoroughbred, Hackney, and Kentucky saddle horse, is light in weight, not to exceed 1,200 pounds, narrow and slender, yet rather long in both body and legs to give freedom of move- ment. The roadster has refinement rather than coarse- ness in bone, and a highly organized nervous sys- tem to give quickness of action. The coach type, or general-purpose horse, 1n- cluding the French and German Coach, Cleve- Types of Horses—Percheron (draft) on the left. German Coach in the middle and Kentucky Saddle Horse (roadster) on the right. land Bay, and a large number of mixed-bred horses, is intermediate in conformation as_ well as size. Such a horse is built for moderate speed, combined with moderate strength. For the farmer who has need of but one team, this type is most suitable, because of its adapta- bility to all kinds of farm work. For walking on soft ground, the general-purpose horse with its lighter weight and longer legs is much more ser- TYPES OF HORSES. 301 viceable than the large, compact draft horse, fitted especially for heavy work in cities. On large farms a limited number of special-purpose draft horses may be used to advantage. A man can drive a large team as easily as a smaller one, which makes it pos- sible to do more work for the number of men employed, at least when the character of the work Clydesdales Ready for Work. is such as to require a predominance of strength rather than action. The mule is popular in the South because it seems to stand hot summer weather better than the horse. Many Northerners also favor mules for farm work, claiming that they require less feed per unit of work, are less subject to disease, and require less shoeing than horses. The Source of Energy.—Plants during growth absorb heat from the sun, which heat is held in latent form in the compounds elaborated. When these com- pounds are taken into the animal body and broken 362 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. apart by digestion, some of this stored heat may be transformed into energy. It is the horse that is de- pended upon to extract this stored up energy, making it serviceable to man. The work horse, therefore, may be likened to a steam engine in which such foods. -as, grain “and hay serve assem though it differs from the engine in that steam is not used as the medium between heat and energy. In the “horse ~the food” is converea into energy in a way not well understood, and this energy manifests itself through the agency of muscular contraction and expansion. It was formerly held that the principal source of energy is the protein of food, since protein goes to produce lean tissue, and lean tissue, or muscle; is instrumental in producing work. This theory has recently been found incor- rect. It has been disproved by the discovery that, with severe muscular exertion, there is not a corre- spondingly large excretion of .nitrogen through the kidneys—coming from the disintegration of muscu- lar tissue or protein food—but, rather, that there is a large expiration of carbon dioxide gas, making it ap- parent that energy comes largely from a breaking © down of non-nitrogenous matter, such as_ starches, fats, etc. It has been further shown that energy may be derived largely from non-nitrogenous material by the fact that heavy work can be done on rations in which starches and fats very largely predominate. Referring again to the steam engine, it may be said that muscular fiber in the animal corresponds to the piston-rod and drivewheel of the engine. The muscle is built out of protein in the food, but it is driven and performs the work through the action of non-nitrog- enous compounds, that is, when only enough protein is supplied in the ration to meet the actual needs of the animal in repairing worn-out muscles and in maintaining other normal functional activities of the body. Otherwise, when protein is fed in excess of TYPES OF HORSES. 363 actual requirements, it may produce work. Protein Requirements Less Than Formerly Sup- posed.—The Wolff-Lehmann standards stipulate that a 1,000-pound horse at medium work requires 24 pounds of dry matter per day, of which there must be 2 pounds of digestible protein. For horses at heavy work these standards call for 26 pounds of dry matter, of which 2.5 pounds must be digestible pro- tein. In this ration for heavy work, the proportion of protein to non-nitrogenous matter (nutritive ratio) is 1:6. -In *A Digest-of Recent Experiments on Horse Feeding,” compiled by C. F. Langworthy of the Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C., there is published the results of an investigation to determine the character of rations commonly fed work horses in the United States. In the words of the author, “letters were addressed to express com- panies, cab companies, fire companies, and other or- ganizations in different cities of the United States, using large numbers of horses, requesting information regarding the rations fed.’’ Information was also se- cured regarding the average weight of the horses. Similar values regarding horses fed by a number of cab companies, etc., in foreign countries were com- piled from available published data. The rations fed army horses in the United States and other coun- tries were also learned by correspondence and by compilation from various sources, and were included for purposes of comparison, as were also data regard- ing the rations fed in a large number of experiments carried on at the experiment stations in this coun- trv, only those tests being selected in which the horses maintained their weight. The average for horses at moderate work, per 1,000 pounds live weight, was found to be 1.49 pounds of digestible protein per day, an amount considerably below the Wolff-Lehmann standards, but a little larger than 364 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. that given by Lavalard, the French investigator. For horses at severe work, Langworthy gives us an average of 1.12 pounds of protein per day; and Lavalard, 1.30 pounds per day. The American av- erage for horses at heavy work, as compiled by Langworthy, is made from a more limited number of figures, which probably accounts for its being smaller than the French investigator’s average and smaller than that of the American ration for horses at medium work. Further investigations concerning requirements for work horses must be made before anything of a positive nature concerning require- ments can be given, but from the results of recent investigations and from a general knowledge of the effectiveness of some of our common American ra- tions fed to farm horses, it seems safe to conclude that much less protein than is called for by the old standards is actually needed. It seems entirely con- servative to say that, instead of 2.5 pounds of pro- tein being needed by a 1,000-pound horse at heavy work, 2 pounds will answer every purpose, giving ’a nutritive ration of 1:8, instead of 1:6. Certainly it is more economical to provide the minimum of pro- tein, because energy can be had at less expense from the carbohydrates and fats than from the protein compounds. Feeding Work Horses in Summer.—During spring and early summer, when the farm horse is pressed into hard and almost continuous service for a long period, it is important that a ration of the greatest efficiency should be provided; that is, one which keeps the horses in good health, active and willing in the harness, doing full work without losing weight. In providing a ration, due consideration should also be given to cost. Roughage is cheaper than grain, but-a horse at hard work is unable to dis- pose of a large proportion of bulky feed. If consid- TYPES OF HORSES. 305 erable time and energy must be expended in masticat- ing rough feed, the usefulness of the horse for work is lessened thereby. The proportion of grain to rough- ness depends upon the severity and rapidity of the work performed. Horses are not so well adapted for the consumption of a large quantity of roughness as are cattle and sheep. The horse has but one stom- ach and this is rather limited in capacity, though the smallness of the stomach is partially compensated for by the size of the intestine, which is more capacious in the horse than in any other farm animal. A horse at hard work should not be expected to consume more rcughness than grain by weight. Summer Rations.—The ration in most common use in the United States for work horses during the summer months is timothy hay and a grain ration con- sisting entirely of oats, or with this grain predomi- nating. ‘Timothy hay is generally in favor as a roughage for horses, because, first, it is unusually free from dust; secondly, it is relished by horses; and, thirdly, it can be grown successfully in nearly all lo- calities.. Oats are in favor for the grain part of the ration because they seem to agree well with horses, giving them spirit for the performance of their work. While this grain is not considered a rich protein food, it seems to contain enough protein to meet re- quirements, even when fed in connection with a rough- age so deficient in protein as timothy hay. This combi- nation gives hardness to the muscle and does not seem to generate heat in sufficient quantity to cause undue sweating. A 1,000-pound horse at severe work, given 14 pounds of oats and 10 pounds of timothy hay per day, would receive in digestible nutrients 1.2 pounds of protein, .53 pound fat, 8.43 pounds carbohydrates —a nutritive ration of 1:8. This gives protein much below Wolff-Lehmann requirements, with a correspondingly wider nutritive ratio, but it is a ra- 366 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. tion which has been thoroughly tested in America and apparently furnishes all the protein needed. A horse weighing 1,200 pounds, at severe work would need 16 pounds of oats and 12 pounds of hay per day. With more moderate work the oats should be diminished somewhat and the hay increased. With lighter (but not more active) work, more hay can be consumed, because more energy will be available for the mastication and digestion of bulky feed. From the results of practical experience it would seem that a grain ration consisting of two-thirds oats and one-third corn is even more satisfactory than oats alone. With such a mixture somewhat less grain is required, and at the usual prices for corn this mixture is more economical than oats. As a matter of fact, bran should always be fed with oats and timothy hay to regulate the bowels and tone the digestive system generally. Feeding Without Oats.—It has formerly been supposed that no other grains could be successfully substituted for oats. Recent tests at some of our ex- periment stations would indicate that combinations of other foods which supply the nutrients, and at the same time possess sufficient bulk, give quite as satis- factory results as oats. At the New Hampshire Sta- tion equal parts of bran and corn proved to be as good as corn and oats, although the writef of the bulletin states.that a considerable quantity of bran makes animals sweat more freely. It is further stated that 2 pounds each of bran and oil meal with corn would be more satisfactory than equal parts of bran and corn. At the North Dakota Experiment Station it was found that equal parts of bran and shorts main- tained the weight of work horses as well as oats. But bran and shorts are often high in price, and this combination might be no more economical than ~ oats. TYPES OF HORSES. 367 Nine pounds of corn mixed with 2 pounds of old process oil meal furnish in digestible nutrients 1.29 pounds protein, 66.4 pounds carbohydrates and .52 pound of fat. Fourteen pounds of oats furnish in digestible nutrients 1.28 pounds of protein, 66.2 pounds carbohydrates and .58 pound fat. It will be seen that the 11 pounds mixture of corn and oil meal fur- nishes almost identically the same digestible nutrients as the 14 pounds of oats. With corn worth 7oc per hundred (39c per bushel), oats 9oc per hundred (28c per bushel and oil meal $30 per ton, the 11 pounds of corn and oil meal will cost $0.093, while the 14 pounds of oats will cost $0.126. Why the corn mix- ture should not be just as good as the oats it would be difficult to tell. It is probable that the presence of the oat hulls, making the oat ration lighter on the stomach, would lessen any tendency toward indiges- tion. A little cut hay, however, mixed with corn and oil meal might do something toward correcting that fault, or the substitution of 2 pounds of bran for 1 pound of oil meal. Nevertheless, while corn is used extensively in the South for work mules, it is not looked upon with favor for heavy draft horses in summer, because it makes them “logy,” free to perspire and often causes skin diseases. Oats have always been in favor, partly because they are handy to feed, and partly because they are sufficiently bulky to make reckless feeding less dangerous. But with oats high in price, as they often are, the farmer who keeps several work horses might do well to study other mixtures of equal efficiency and lower cost. CHAPTER XXXVI. WINTER RATIONS FOR WORK HORSES. More Carbonaceous Food Needed in Winter.— Most farmers hdve less work for horses in winter than in summer. It is an excellent plan, and much more economical,to rough through some of the older horses which are not needed for winter work. Those reserved for work in winter should have good care and should be fed according to the work performed. During cold weather, when more feed goes to furnish heat for the body, it stands to reason that a horse needs a larger proportion of heat-making food. Equal parts of corn and oats by weight would be more satisfactory and ordinarily cheaper than a larger proportion of oats. Barley is sometimes fed as a substitute for corn where the latter is less grown. Half oats and half bar- ley during summer, and three parts of barley to one of oats by weight during cold weather, might be used, though horses relish barley less than corn or oats, and it is apt to produce digestive disorders unless boiled. At the North Dakota Experiment Station barley was fed in comparison with oats to both horses and mules. The roughage consisted of timothy hay. The experi- menter says: “This trial indicates that horses when taxed to the limit by hard work, cannot be supported upon barley quite so well as upon oats and that it is worth slightly less per pound than oats with stock which is given a medium amount of work. It in- dicates, further, that mules take less kindly to barley than do horses, and that horses which are inclined to be ‘dainty’ eaters, will not eat barley so readily as oats.” Z "368 WINTER RATIONS FOR WORK HORSES. 309 Kafir corn has been tested at the Oklahoma Ex- periment Station, where it was found entirely sat- isfactory for work horses, being both palatable and nutritious, but somewhat below corn in feeding value. It is a common practice, in sections where Kafir corn is grown, to feed the unthrashed heads, although it is thought better results can be secured by grinding the seeds, owing to their hard, flinty character. Molasses for Horses.—With the growth of the sugar industry in America much interest is being manifested in the feeding value of molasses, which product is obtained in the manufacture of sugar from the beet and sugar from cane. In the vi- cinity of sugar factories, molasses can be purchased at a very nominal sum, sometimes as low as $1.00 per ton. From the fact that molasses is rich in car- bohydrates, it would seem that it is especially suited for the production of work. From the further: fact that horses are extremely fond of sweets, it is not difficult to understand why molasses mixed with dry foods adds materially to the palatability of such foods. Molasses is fed by sprinkling it upon dry feed after it has been diluted somewhat with water, or by mixing it with some absorbent, as peat dust, or a material rich in nitrogen, as dried blood. The “Agricultural Gazette” of New South Wales de- scribes the feeding of cane molasses to 400 work horses at a sugar plantation in the Fiji Islands. It is stated that “fifteen pounds can be given to a 1,270-pound working horse with advantage to the health of the animal and to the efficiency of its work. It produces no undue fattening, softness, nor injury to the wind. The high proportion of salts in it has no injurious effect. An albuminoid ratio as low as 1:11.8 has proved highly suitable for heavy, con- 370 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. tinuous work when a sufficient quantity of digesti- ble matter is given.’”” The ration fed was 15 pounds of molasses, 4 pounds of corn, 3 pounds of bran, in addition to sugar-cane tops. Bran was found valu- able as a corrective for constipation produced by the molasses. Mr. G. H. Berns in the “American Veterinary Re- view’ gives an interesting report of the feeding of molasses to 100 horses at heavy work, averaging 1,700 pounds in weight. These horses were each fed night and morning one quart of molasses diluted with three quarts of water mixed with six pounds of cut hay, 1.5 pounds of corn meal and 2.5 quarts of coarse bran. The noon meal consisted of five quarts of dry oats and the night meal was rein- forced by eleven pounds of uncut hay. This ration proved to be remarkably successful in keeping the horses in excellent health, whereas they had for- merly been troubled to some extent with spasmodic colic. The horses not only performed heavy work but gained in weight during the trial. Mr. Berns says: “molasses of a good quality is a most nutri- tious food for horses, easily digested and assimi- tated, and will in many cases correct faulty digestive process; and horses will do fully as much work and at the same time remain, as a rule, in much better condition than animals fed on dry food, while the cost of feeding is reduced from 25 to 33 per cent.” He calculates one quart of molasses the equivalent of three to four quarts of oats. Other experiments, both abroad and in our own country, give further evidence that molasses is a valuable food for both work horses and driving horses. ‘Cottonseed meal has been fed in tests to work horses at the North Carolina, New Hampshire and Louisiana Experiment Stations. At the former Station as high as two pounds per day were fed to WINTER RATIONS FOR WORK HORSES. 371 each horse with satisfactory results. When this amount was increased to 3.5 pounds, the results were less favorable. At the New Hampshire Sta- tion cottonseed meal proved less satisfactory than oil meal as a part of the grain ration. From one to two pounds per day were fed to mules successfully at the Louisiana Station, which Station urges the importance of having the meal a good quality. Prairie hay, as has been mentioned, is very simi- lar in composition to timothy hay, both being rich in carbohydrates. It is entirely safe to feed and is in popular favor in the West for horses. Like timo- thy, it has a small leaf surface, therefore curing easily and being comparatively free from dust. Cane, or sorghum hay, when properly cured is con- sidered a very good feed for horses. In the drier climates, where this fodder can be more success- fully grown than most other fodders, its use is very common. It is more relished when sown rather thickly to make the stems less coarse. More nutri- ents can be obtained per acre when sorghum is al- lowed to become fairly ripe. Kafir corn fodder is similar to sorghum, but is perhaps less relished, because of the presence of sugar in the latter. Cornstalks cured in the shock are sometimes fed to work horses as a substitute for timothy hay. At the New Hampshire Experiment Station it was found that this material is quite as valuable, pound for pound, as timothy, when fed either with corn and bran, or with corn and oats. The corn stover cost only one-third as much as the timothy hay, and therefore proved much more economical. For horses at moderate work the stalks may be fed uncut. For severe work there would be some advantage in shredding the stalks to make the fodder more easily masticated. Cornstalks are produced in abundance 372 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. on all farms in the corn belt, and the substitution of this cheap feed for at least a part of the higher priced timothy or prairie hay is a matter worthy of the consideration of every farmer. Emphasis is again made upon the necessity of cutting the corn as soon as the ears harden and before the leaves and stalk become dead. Millet Hay Not a Safe Feed for Horses.—As reported by the North Dakota Experiment Station, where a thorough investigation was made, “Millet when used entirely as a coarse feed is injurious to horses: first, in producing an increased action. of the kidneys; secondly, in causing lameness and a swelling of the joints; thirdly, in producing an in- fusion of blood into the joints; fourthly, in destroy- ing the texture of the bone, rendering it softer and less tenacious so that traction causes the ligaments and muscles to be torn loose.”” Vhis seems to agree with the experience of most farmers who have fed millet in liberal quantity to horses. Straw is sometimes made the roughage part of the ration for horses. While it has some value, it is nevertheless true that much more grain is needed when hay is replaced by straw. Idle work horses in winter no doubt can utilize some straw, but this material is so largely indigestible it is requiring too much of a horse to force him to gain a large part of his sustenance from it. Oat straw is considerably richer in nutrients than wheat straw and is more relished by all classes of animals. Oat hay, which has been cut while the seeds are in the dough and cured as hay, is found very satis- factory for horses, especially in winter, when the work may be light and the horse has more time for mastication. If a part of the oats can be fed un- thrashed, the cost is lessened. Oats that have blown down and become lodged just before time for cut-~ WINTER RATIONS FOR WORK HORSES. 373 ting with the binder may be cut with a mower and handled to advantage as hay. Clover hay has not been held in high favor as a roughage for horses for two principal reasons. First, clover with its large leaf surface very often goes in the mow or stack so moist that fermentation, which is caused by the multiplication of bacteria, takes place. During this oxidation, or slow burning process, particles of blackened, partially carbonized leaves are produced, which finely-divided matter tises in the air in clouds of dust whenever the hay is moved. Some cf it enters the nostrils of the horse and is drawn into the lung cells, there setting up an irritation which often brings on a disease known as heaves. Secondly, there is a prevalent notion among horsemen, well founded or otherwise, that clover hay produces a softer flesh, and a horse so fed sweats more freely than one fed timothy. Bright, well-cured clover should be of considera- ble value for the work horse, but in feeding this hay it must be borne in mind that it is much richer in protein than the fodders and hay plants already described, which makes it obvious that the grain ration should be correspondingly more starchy. Clover when fed with corn alone should give a good balance of nutrients for the work animal. Could it be fed in a moistened condition to keep down any dust, it would doubtless be a satisfactory ration— in fact, a better ration than timothy and corn if the hay is fed in a limited quantity. Alfalfa, which belongs to the same family as clover, meets with similar objection. It is likely to be dusty, especially when grown in sections of con- siderable rainfall. It is also a well known fact that alfalfa makes animals drink more water, increasing the action of the kidneys. Whether or not this is in any way detrimental to the health of the work 374 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. horse has not been determined. There is, also, a prejudice against it because it has a cathartic effect, more noticeable when horses are driven at a trot before the wagon. It is also true that horses fed alfalfa sweat more freely than horses fed timothy or prairie hay. A recent bulletin, however, issued By the Utah Station shows very favorable results for alfalfa when fed to work horses. One horse in each of two draft teams was fed timothy hay and the other horse in each team was fed alfalfa, all for a period of three months, from January to April. The grain ration consisted of bran and shorts in every case. The horses weighed about 1,400 pounds each. Dur- ing this first period one horse on timothy lost 47 pounds and the other 77 pounds. One horse on al- falfa gained 4 pounds and the other lost 8 pounds. During the second period, from April until June, those which had been fed timothy were given alfalfa and those fed alfalfa were given timothy. One horse gained 5 pounds on timothy and the other lost 65 pounds. One horse on alfalfa gained 50 pounds and the other gained 25 pounds. The feeds were again reversed during each of two later pe- riods with results in both favoring alfalfa. During most of the time the horses were at moderate work. The experiment shows strongly in favor of alfalfa - as compared with timothy. The heavy losses on timothy may be partially accounted for by the fact that during these experiments something over twice as much hay as grain was fed. This was a large proportion of hay to grain for work horses. Timo- thy is masticated and digested with more difficulty than alfalfa, which gives the latter some advantage in heavy hay feeding. However, the results of this experiment would tend to disprove the theory that alfalfa can not be fed to work horses successfully. WINTER RATIONS FOR WORK HORSES. 375 Those who have fed alfalfa are of the opinion, generally, that alfalfa if fed to work horses should be limited in quantity. A larger proportion of corn should be fed when alfalfa is used, since alfalfa it- self is rich in protein and a protein grain mixture would not be needed. It is better economy to fur- nish only enough protein to meet actual require- ments, because the carbohydrates are a cheaper source of energy. Alfalfa is wonderfully relished by horses, which makes it all the more necessary to guard against feeding an oversupply. Wintering Idle Farm Horses.—Upon the average farm the brunt of work comes during the growing season. Rather than keep all work horses in more or less confinement during the winter months, con- tinuing the liberal use of grain, it is advisable to rough through those not needed. Such _ horses should be given a protected yard and shed before cold weather sets in. As winter comes on, these horses grow a heavy coat of hair, which gives them excellent protection. They should be given all the hay, cornstalks, sorghum or oat straw they will con- sume, under which circumstances they will require but little or no grain. Where alfalfa and clover are fed to cattle and sheep on full feed there are al- ways refuse stems. These can be fed to such horses to excellent advantage. Alfalfa and clover, after having had some of the leaves or chaff first shaken out for pig feeding, are relished by horses. If the shed is kept well bedded, horses can be very com- fortably wintered in this way at much less expense than by stabling. Light grain feeding, together with exercise, should begin six weeks before the spring work is started, to put the horses in condition for work. Feeding the Driving Horse.—In feeding the driv- ing horse the same general plan that has been sug- 376 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. gested for work horses should be followed. The driver should not have such laxative foods as al- falfa, nor very much bran, and should also be given a somewhat smaller proportion of roughage. The driving horse will not stand heavy corn feeding. Feeding the Brood Mare.—There has been for some time a good demand for draft. and general-purpose horses for both city and farm work. Many farmers are situated so they may raise a team of colts each year, thereby add- ing materially to their annual revenues without seriously interfering with farm operations. A team of mares in foal can be worked until the day of foal- ing, if the work is not unusually severe and the driver is careful. In fact, moderate exercise is nec- essary for the mare in foal. Such a mare should be fed much as has been suggested for work horses, with perhaps the addition of somewhat more pro-- tein food like bran or a little oil meal, as foods rich in protein and mineral matter are especially valu- able for mares carrying young. Clover or alfalfa hay, however, frequently causes abortion in work mares. Care of the Mare.—After foaling, the mare should be given several days of rest, not only to enable her to recover her strength, but to give the young colt the proper start. During the first few days of recu- peration a hot bran mash fed once a day has both a cooling and a laxative effect, which is extremely ben- eficial. Some farmers make a practice of permitting the foal to go to the field with the team, while others prefer to keep the colt in the barn. During the first few weeks it is better for the colt to be given nour- ishment oftener than three times a day. For this reason he is perhaps better off in the field with the team if no serious inconvenience is caused. When a little older such a colt may be kept in the barn and WINTER RATIONS FOR WORK HORSES. 377 given nourishment when the mare comes from work. Two colts are company for each other, which makes them more contented both in the field and when confined together in the stable. Young colts should be given oats rather liberally, with a lit- tle bran and shelled corn as early as they can be ° taught to eat. If eating well at the age of five months, they can be weaned from the dam without as much shrinking as when unaccustomed to grain. Rearing the Weanling.—Growing colts should have more protein food than was recommended for work horses. During the summer, clover, alfalfa or bluegrass pastures are excellent. During the winter considerable clover or alfalfa can also be fed if it is not too dusty. If other forms of roughage than these are used, bran or some other protein foods must be fed along with oats. The colt should be fed ina way that will bring about the best develop- ment at a moderate cost. . Rough feed should be fed generously, with sufficient grain to keep the colt in good growing condition. Grinding grain for horses is not ecenomical un- less a horse has poor teeth. Experiments tend to show that results obtained by grinding grain are not enough better to pay for the cost of grinding. As has already been stated, the animal can use energy more economically than the steam engine, because of a less waste of power. This same principle un- doubtedly holds true in connection with cutting hay or shredding fodder. The Utah Station reports a falling off in weight when horses were fed cut timo- thy hay, caused by the sharp ends. Clover and al- falfa, cut, gave slightly better results than uncut hay, but not enough better to pay for cutting. Watering horses before feeding and after feeding ‘have been tested to note possible differences in re- sults. ‘The_experimenter concludes that “horses 378 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. should be watered both before and after eating.” Salt in limited quantity should be placed above the manger often enough to furnish the horse with what the system needs. It is perhaps better not to have it within reach at all times, as some horses will eat to excess. Bedding should always be used liberally. A horse at hard work needs rest at night, and much more rest is had when the horse is given a good bed of straw. It should not be permitted to become foul, as such things not only lessen the comfort of the animal but promote disease. Shelter in the winter time should be warm enough to keep work horses comfortable while at rest. From the viewpoint of feeding, a warm barn is most economical. This does not mean that horses should be kept too warm for comfort or should be deprived of fresh air, the latter being especially important. The lack of blankets in winter for covering horses standing in the cold is not only cruel but costly. Shelter in summer is primarily to keep horses out of the hot sun’s rays while at rest. A secondary value of shelter in late summer is protection from flies. Zuntz found that a horse excreted 10 per cent more carbon dioxide while fighting flies, and therefore used correspondingly more food when thus irri- tated. Horses have little natural protection from flies, and nets pay for themselves in a short time by an actual saving of food. Nor is it unreason- able to think that netting on the windows and doors of stables would not more than pay for the trouble and material. Stalls should be darkened when flies are troublesome. Quietness in Handling Horses.—The horse is a most sensitive animal, some individuals being much more sensitive than others. Striking them or shouting commands is a most contemptible practice, WINTER RATIONS FOR WORK HORSES. 379 not only because it indicates a complete lack of ap- preciation for so noble a beast, but also because it de- stroys nervous energy in the horse, making him a less economical producer than if he were protected at all times from these nervous shocks. It is a re- flection upon our humanity, but it is nevertheless true, that in America more horses are made short- lived by ill-treatment and excessive work than by poor feeding. APPENDIX. METHODS OF GROWING THE LEGUMINOUS CROPS, COWPEAS, SOY BEANS AND ALFALFA. COW PEAS. By Do A Oars, Leguminous crops play a very important part in successful farming, as they furnish grain and forage richer in protein than other crops, and at the same time are taking free nitrogen from the air through their root tubercles, and leaving it in the soil as avail- able plant food. Among the leguminous plants of spe- cial value to the farmer, cowpeas play an important part, particularly in the Southern states; but their suc- cessful production is gradually finding a more north- ern latitude. Being an annual and producing but one crop in a season, they are not now even to be com- pared with alfalfa, which is a perennial and produces from three to four crops annually. Cowpeas are more adapted to fill the niche where alfalfa is not success- fully grown, or to be used as a catch crop after wheat or oats. Cowpeas will mature a hay crop in from sixty to seventy days, and a seed crop in eighty to ninety days. Planting.—Being a warm weather crop, cowpeas should not be planted until the ground is thor- oughly warmed, preferably after corn planting or even later. Better results are usually obtained by planting in drills about 30 inches apart, and cultivating as for corn. If land is scarce they may be planted 20 inches apart, and cultivated by removing all but one shovel 381 382 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. from the cultivator. This method will produce a little larger yield per acre, but requires more pains in cul- tivating. The peas may be seeded with an ordinary grain drill by closing some of the holes so-as to plant the proper distance apart; or they may be planted with a check row planter by removing the check row wire and substituting the chain so as to drill them instead of check-rowing them. It usually requires the plates with the largest holes, and the machine so adjusted as to seed as fast as possible. If it is desired to plant thick, the planter may go over the ground a second time, planting between the rows already planted. Cowpeas have also been planted successfully with the lister. When planted far enough apart to cultivate, one-half bushel of seed per acre is sufficient. When planted half the distance of corn rows, it will re- quire about one bushel per acre. Varieties—The bush varieties are earlier in maturing than the trailing varieties, and they are also more easily harvested. For the latitude of Kan- sas and Nebraska, the “Whip-poor-will” and “Clay” are probably the best varieties. Properly planted in a good soil, similar to best corn ground, in which there is sufficient moisture to sprout the seed, cow- peas will continue to thrive, even though the weather is dry. Harvesting for Hay.—The harvesting of cow- peas for hay, which should be done when the pods are well formed and the lower leaves begin to turn yel- low, may be done with a mowing machine, or, better, with a bean harvester, the latter being a machine for cutting the roots just below the surface and throw- ing two rows together to form a windrow. The mow- ing machine does not cut low enough to get all the leaves, and, of course, does not place the crop in wind- rows. After remaining in windrows from 24 to 36 hours, depending on the weather, this crop should be APPENDIX. 383 | put into small narrow cocks, and if possible covered with hay caps or with canvas, the purpose being to keep the leaves from becoming brittle and falling off before the stems are cured. When cured, which will probably require several days, it should be hauled to the mow or stack. Harvesting for Seed—The growing of cowpeas for seed is a rather laborious process, as the pods ripen at different intervals and it makes the harvest- ing atany onetime impossible ; consequently the pods have to be gathered by hand picking. The pods may be threshed with a common wheat thresher, by re- moving most of the concaves and the teeth, which would crack the seed. From 8 to 12 bushels per acre is considered a good yield. Most of our seed comes from the Southern states. As a Feed.—Cowpeas are usually fed as hay, the same as alfalfa or clover. If one has an ensilage or hay cutter, he would materially increase the value of cowpeas by cutting them. ‘It should not be fed as the exclusive hay diet, as it is very rich in protein, but if fed with other roughage that is more carbonaceous in character, better results will be obtained from both classes of feed. Green cowpeas are liable to cause bloat in cattle or sheep when pastured or fed green. They make excellent hog pasture after the pods have formed. As Silage—Cowpeas have been used success- fully as a silage crop, and for this purpose may be grown separately or planted with the corn and har- vested at the same time as the corn. In addition, cow- peas not only furnish more variety, but raise the pro- tein content of the silage and make it more valuable for feeding purposes. . Alfalfa After Cowpeas.—The soil on which cow- peas have been grown, being free from weeds, is in an almost ideal condition for fall seeding of alfalfa 384 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. or grass, as they leave the soil in a firm but mellow condition and filled with available nitrogen, so nec- essary in giving young plants, especially young al- falfa, a vigorous start. SOY BEANS: By-D. H. Oris. Under the conditions existing in Kansas and Ne braska, cowpeas seem more adapted for forage, and soy beans for grain. Soy Beans a Profitable Crop.—The soy bean seed contains 29.6 lbs. digestible protein in every hundred- weight, which is a little more than oil meal. The av- erage yield of soy beans is not very heavy, and to the one used to comparing everything with corn it will seem unprofitable. The average yield at the Kansas Experiment Station for 12 years was 12 bushels per acre, while corn planted alongside the beans yielded 31.6 bushels per acre, and Kafir corn 43.8 bushels per acre. Comparing these yields on the basis of pro- tein produced, the soy beans outrank both corn and Kafir corn. As soy bean meal will take the place of oil meal, pound for pound, and as the latter costs from $20 to $25 per ton, it will be seen that soy beans are, after all, a very profitable crop. Planting.—Soy beans can stand dry weather and are not injured by chinch bugs. Like cowpeas, they are a warm weather plant, and should not be seeded until all possible danger from frost is past. They are usually planted after corn planting, and very fair yields have been obtained when planted after wheat or oat harvest. They should not be planted broadcast, but preferably drilled in rows from 30 to 42 inches apart, with the beans from one to two inches apart in the row. One-half bushel is sufficient seed for an acre. Surface planting usually gives the best results, although listing at times has been successful. They can be planted with APPENDIX. 385 a wheat drill by closing some of the holes, or they may be seeded with the corn planter. Cultivation is the same as for corn. Harvesting for Grain.—The harvesting of soy beans should take place when the pods turn brown, and before the beans are quite ripe; otherwise the pods will break open and the beans be wasted. The pods form very close to the ground, and for this reason the harvesting should be done with the bean harvester or some similar contrivance, as a cultivator relieved of its shovels and having bolted to the inner shank of each beam a horizontal knife, set at such an angle as to prevent clogging. As soon as cut, the beans should be partially cured in the windrow, and in about 24 hours should be cocked, and, if possible, covered with hay caps or canvas, remaining thus several days until properly cured. Threshing.—When weather conditions are un- favorable for harvesting and the beans shatter, they can be profitably fed by allowing the hogs to run in the field after the crop is removed. The thresh- ing can be done with a common wheat thresher by using blank concaves to prevent the cracking of the beans. : Curing the Beans for Seed.—When the beans are intended for seed they should not be stored in large quantities, but rather spread over a large sur- face, not over two feet deep; otherwise they are liable to heat and their germinating power will be destroyed. Harvesting for Hay.—When it is desired to har- vest for forage, the plants should be cut as soon as ‘the beans are well formed, and cured in the same way as when harvested for grain. Soy Beans as Feed.—Since soy beans are as rich in protein as oil meal, they should be fed with the same care and discretion that one would use 386 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING, | when feeding oil meal. In no case should soy beans be used as the exclusive grain ration. One- sixth to one-fifth soy beans in the grain is usually sufficient and is an economical feed. Experi- ments at the Kansas Experiment Station with hogs show that there is a saving of from 13 per cent to 37 per cent of the grain required to produce a hundred pounds of gain when soy beans form a part of the ration. When practicable soy beans should be ground, but very good results have been obtained by feeding the beans whole to hogs. Stock of all kinds like them as a part ration, but they are especially adapted to young, growing stock to de- velop bone and muscle. Alfalfa, etc., After Soy Beans.—Soy beans, like cow peas, have a very beneficial effect on the soil, and are an excellent crop to precede alfalfiassred clover and grasses. When the farmer can grow his protein in the form of alfalfa, it is undoubtedly cheaper than the growing of soy beans, and on ac- count of the small yield their use on an alfalfa farm would be limited; but where alfalfa has not been a success and there is a lack of protein in the feeding stuffs, or where they can be grown as a catch crop after wheat or oats, soy beans de- serve favorable consideration. ALFALFA. By E. G Montgomery. Soil—Any good corn land will raise alfalfa, providing water does not stand too near the surface. Alfalfa is grown successfully not only in sandy soil and light loam, but in heavy clay. It will not do in peaty soils or on land where water stands, or where the land is heavily flooded during the growiny season. In many of the older farming districts soils of good fertility are found that are, however, APPENDIX. 387 sour, or acid. Alfalfa will not grow on such soils until enough lime has been applied to the soil to correct the acidity. Inoculation of the soil is very important in dis- tricts where alfalfa has never been grown before. The plant will not succeed unless the particular bacteria which form the nodules on its roots and take the nitrogen from the air are present in the soil. Inoculation may be made either with soil taken from an old alfalfa fieid or by the use of the cultures now on the market for that purpose. The soil should be prepared very carefully. The ground should be well plowed, then thoroughly worked down with harrow and disk until a fine, firm seed bed is secured. It will never pay to half prepare ground for alfalfa. Seeding.—Alfalfa seed is generally sown alone in the West. The main reason for this is that there is often only enough rain to carry one crop on the land successfully, and there is always danger of hot, dry weather immediately after harvest. On rich soils, in regions where there is assurance of an abundance of rain during the whole season, it may be safe to sow with a nurse crop. The seed is usually sown at the rate of about 20 pounds per acre, though there are successful alfalfa growers who consider 15 pounds sufficient. Broadcast seeding is generally considered safer than drilling, owing to the danger of the young plants being covered in the drill rows by heavy rains washing the dirt in. After broadcasting the seed, cover with a harrow. Ifa poor stand is obtained or if it kills out in spots, parts of the field may be disked early in the spring and resown, the seeds being covered with a smooth- ing harrow. Spring seeding is generally practiced, sowing the seed as soon as the soil can be worked. 388 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. Fall seeding, however, is coming rapidly into fa- vor, since the use of the land is not lost during a whole season, and it is not necessary to go to the expense of keeping down weeds. The greatest ob- jection to fall seeding is the fact that falls are often too dry to insure a good growth. The seed should be sown at least six or eight weeks before killing frost. Care.—If{ spring sown, it will be necessary to keep weeds down the first year by cutting Alfalfa. Showing advantage of early fall sowing. Beginning on the left of the picture the seed was sown August 19, Septem- ber 15 and October 1, respectively. All were dug up April 13 of the following spring. with the mowing machine, setting the cutter bar four or five inches high. Do this whenever the weeds threaten to destroy the alfalfa, which they can easily do. Repeat as often as necessary. If there is much trash after cutting, rake it up and haul it off. Do not pasture the first year. APPENDIX. 389 Cutting for Hay.—The second year two to four crops of hay should be secured. The proper time to cut is when about one-tenth to one-fifth of the plants are in bloom. Much more hay will be se- cured during the season by cutting at this time than later, and it will be of better quality. The seed crop is generally taken from the sec- ond or third cutting. It takes rather dry weather to cause the plant to set seed. For that reason it seldom produces a profitable seed crop in a humid climate, or when there is a large amount of rain during the growing season. The seed crop is usu- ally cut with a mower and threshed with a clover huller or an ordinary threshing machine. Thickening the Stand.—Disking the old alfalfa sod is often practiced to thicken up the stand. The sod should not be disked until it is at least two or three years old. The disks should be set almost straight, so as to split the crowns but not cut the plants off. Disking should be done in early spring before growth starts. It is usually best to follow the disk with a smoothing harrow. Manuring the sod is always beneficial, especially if the soil is very sandy or poor. Give a moderate dressing of well rotted manure during the winter. Varieties.—Turkestan alfalfa gives promise of being more drought resistant than ordinary alfalfa, and may be valuable in semiarid regions, but it does not yield so well in humid regions. Alfalfa adapts itself more or less to new conditions, and it has been found that alfalfa from Northern-grown seed is less subject to winterkilling than from Southern-grown seed. As a general rule seed should be procured which has been grown under conditions similar to those under which it is to be sown. 390 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. TABLES. By permission of the author, the following tables are taken from Henry’s “Feeds and Feeding: a Handbook for the Student and Farmer’ (Sixth Edition). In compounding rations, use Table II, which gives digestible nutrients. Table I. Average Composition of American Feed- ing Stuffs. “This table is mainly from Farmers’ Bulletin 22, United States Department of Agriculture, 1895, which in turn is based on Jenkins and Winton’s tables in Bulletin 11, Office of Experiment Sta- tions, Department of Agriculture, Washington. “Analyses not from the source above mentioned are in most cases from the following: “Zusam- mensetzung der Futterm., Dietrich and Konig; Farm Foods, Wolff, English edition, Cousins; Woll, Handbook for Farmers and Dairymen; Holland, Report Massachusetts (Hatch) Experiment Sta- tion, 1896; Jenkins and Winton’s tables; and Bul- letin 87, New Jersey Experiment Station :” ee eee eee Percentage composition. 38 Feeding stuffs. a : Nitro- | Ether] <= Water. | Ash. | fein. | ‘aber. (gen-free| ex; | zg CONCENTRATES— Barley. 2c. see 10:9: = 2:4-/12.4 2.7 469.8 Ses) Barley meal ........ 19) 2.6 . Ol 1Go a tGOss eee 3 Barley screenings .:. 12:2 3.6 12.3 7.3 61.8 28 2 Bran, all analyses.... 11.9 5.8 15.4 9.0 53.9 4.0 88 Bran, spring wheat.. 11.5 54 161 8.0 545 45 10 Bran, winter wheat.. 12.3 5.9 16.0 8.1 53.7 4.0 7 Brewers’ grains, wet. 75.7 1.0 5.4 3.8 125 1.6 D5 Brewers’ grains, dried 8.2 3.6 19.9 11.0 51.7 546 3 Broom-corn seed .... 11.5 3.4 10.2 7.1 63.6 3.0 2 Buckwheat ser sescier W262 .2:0> 1008.10 Gti ee 8 Buckwheat flour .... 14.6 1.0 6:9 0:3 75:8 14 4 Buckwheat hulls .... 13.2 2.2 4.6 43.5 35.3 1.1 2 Buckwheat ‘bran :... 10:5" 310° 12:4. 319 38:8) 333 2 APPENDIX. 391 TABLE I.—AVERAGE COMPOSITION OF AMERICAN FEEDING Sturrs.—Continued. Percentage composition. 38 Feeding stuffs. : Nitro- | Ether) 55 Water. | Ash. | fin’ | Gor. |gea-free| OX; | 8 CONCENTRATES—Cont. Buckwheat shorts ... 11.1 5.1 27.1 83 40.8 7.6 2 Buckwheat middlings. 13.2 48 28.9 4.1 41.9 7.1 3 Cocoanut cake ....,. LOS Oe OL 4 2S S8a0) elle. COrmpGent 5. cscs! s-sinee HOG? Sloe Lia. 42.2, 00:4. 75:0). 86 WOU CHIT GN ec insie «stone Se lke OD ae On 520) 6S Corn, sweet ........ SS elon elit Gee oc-on4GG.s 1S. 7 o26 Gorn meal oo 52213065 << 15:0 21.4 “2 1:9 63:7 3:8 7 COrme COD). cass st 10% Va = 24s 201 549° O5 28 Gorn and cob meal.. 15.1 15 85 66 648 3.5 7 Gombe over Se eonoeae oo Tesh 9-0) esi 662.20 2.5.8 5 COLUM S CCTM yt irene HOt, 4.0" 88 — 451. 64.0) 7.4 3 Cotton: seed! -. 2 5... .4- 10:3 35 184 23:2 24.7 19.9 5 Cotton seed, roasted.. 61 5.5 16.8 20.4 23.5 27.7 2 Cotton-seed meal .... 8.2 7.2 42.38 5.6 23.6 13.1 35 Cotton-seed hulls .... 111 28 4.2 463 33.4 2.2 20 Cotton-seed kernels (without hulls) ... 6.2 47 31.2 3.7 17.6 36.6 2 WOW DEAN mericierrsten 2 14:8 3:2 20:8 4.1 55.7, 14 5 Cream gluten .......°81 0.7 362 1.3 39.0 14.8 3 Dried starch and su- Bar feed! saws cs s 2 s LOG OS aS7 4:7 54:8). 9:0 4 IP Bie e(2s Mesage a eee Qi Aehe eOOlG: se (2322 ado. ta oO Flax seed, ground.... 81 4.7 216 7.3 27.9 30.4 2 Flour, dark feeding... 9.7 43 19.9 38 56.2 6.2 1 Flour, high grade.... 12.2 06 149 0.3 70.0 2.0 1 Flour, low grade..... 120 » 2.0 180 09 63.3 . 3.9 iL Germ meal .... Soles sr i O90. G25. 7 6 Ghitene mealies =. ..«- B09. 993) 3:8 46:5 9 11a ' 20 Gluten feed'-........ (eS ell 24:0) s Oror od? “10.8 Grano-gluten ....... 5.8 2.8 31.1 12.0 33.4 14.9 1 Hominy chops ...... A Ora VOLS) 983.8) 164.5) 98:3) | 2 Morse baat s...6---. 11a > a [266 -7.2 500. 1.0 aT Hungarian grass seed. 95 5.0 99 7.7 63.2 4.7 1 Kafir-corn seed....... O33 Ibe 99° 14 74.9 3:0 1 Linseed meal, old PLOCESS Hey seraiie see Or a ae0 * 8.9854 7.9 “ak Linseed meal, new PEOGCES i <-tays tere or HOM St ome | oem se. sae) pole Maize feed, Chicago. 9.1 0.9 22.8 7.6 52.7 6.9 3 Malt sprouts ....... HO Siva eae LOT 48.5 ee 4 NERO GIT OS Ric) ce is ciee 19.1 3.3 156 4.6 604 4.0; 32 392 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. TABLE I.—AVERAGE COMPOSITION OF AMERICAN FEEDING Sturrs.—Continued. - Percentage composition. No. of Feeding stuffs. nee tract. Nitro- gen-free extract. Crude Water. ‘ber analyses. CONCENTRATES—Cont. Millet seed! recuse 143007 3:8) WHESs 3. “Oiby “bt 24s eee ORGS beta cient eat nen c 10S BORIS Os 59 hi Oe Oatedustieaspeerree 6:5) 56:9) 1355)- 1822502 ete 2 Qatiteed sic. - we ve (a Bat = GO) 1G OFA eae 4 Oatyhall sec -eeee fo VOih - g3t0 9297 Oa Meet) 1 Oatemenlinn aeeeserae Too T2100 AS 10,9556 74a aie 6 Palm-nut meal ...... 10.4 43 168 24.0 35.0 9.5 600 Peanut kernel (with- ont hills) Parser fed) (2422729 eieOber Gi Olo 7 Peanut meal) 22... U0) 94.99 47Gb 23 ees Ue Peameall ye ise tices 10:5) 42:6, (20:2) 14:4 Foe ales 2 Rape-seed cake ....... 10:0. 7.9 31.2) 11:3> 300) 7 9:GRaD00 RAGE Mia fesetac stan eee 124 04 - .74 0.2. (79:2: 04 eto Racewbrany foe. scp-eer Oe 0.0) lays, Ooh O20 meerses 5 Trivers Jr 5.5 eas ace 8.2 21322 72 3G apne) oo eO mmm Own 3 Ricesmeals.) see oe LOZ Sis 12305 de vol eleoa 2 IRICEN TONS ois ig. Soko 10505 620 TET Gop S50 ieee 4 RYO. S Bis feca tors ect henacsecn oes TGs EOP S056 5 lean ero eelen 6 Rye Prana, si\cvcare kote L6-) 3:6) 14:7) 395 63:88 mes 7 Rye. our aw oe. vane OB MOR stl” WEE fishes) (DME 4 RY eMSHONUS aera creer 953) > 0:9) SO ed 559-0 ees) it Shortens steranceae cin 11.8. 4:6 14.9. --7.456.8' abe Soy beanies sie weer A08 4.7 ©34,0 ~ 458° As ee eloe 8 Sorghum seed ....... 12. 2 Ol 256) 69'S. SS comem) Starch feed, wet...: 654 0.3 G1 3:1 22:0 ~Si5 a2 Sunflower seed ...... 816 12:6 16.3: 29:9" “204 2ike 2 Sunflower-seed' cake.. 10.8 6.7 32.8 13.5 27. Sie Wheat, all analyses...10.5 - 1:8 11.9 -4:8 71.9) (s2ieeoeG Wheat screenings ... 11.6 2.9 12.5 49 65.1 3.0510 Wheat, spring ...... 10.4. U9 12.5.6 a8 * sil 26 eee eles Wheat, winter ...... 1036) AS) Ss | Sai ON eee ROUGHAGE— Corn husks, field cured 50.9 1.8 2.5 15.8 28.3 0.7 16 Corn leaves,“ ‘** 30.0 ° 5.5 6.0.214 35:7. 2a Corn stover,** -** 40.5 34 «3.8 19:7 31.5 ieieaeo Fodder corn, ‘‘ ** - 42.2 2.7 -4.5 14.3 (34.7 eGeuege yKafir corn stover, Held Mcuredi ya s-verctes 134. 19:3. 15.59 (27.942: 0 5 elen 2 yAverage of Kansas (Bulletin 103) and Oklahoma (Bulletin 37) tests. APPENDIX. 393 TABLE JI.—AVERAGE COMPOSITION OF AMERICAN [FEEDING Strurrs.—Continued. Percentage composition. Nitro- | Ether gen-free! €X- extract. | tract. Feeding stuffs. Crude fiber. Pro- Water. tein. Ash. RouGHAGE.—Cont. *Sorghum, field cured 94.2 8.2 5.8 23.38 55.5 1.5 1 Corn forage, green. Dent varieties ...... Ol Onl oot acl e > Greet 10:5om OS Dent, kernels glazed. 73.4- 15 2.0 67 15.5 0.9 7 Flint varieties ...... 79.8 ial 2.0 4.3 12.1 0.7 40 imipkernels clazede diale. Ikle= 27 94:3" 14:6)". 0:8 “10 Fodder corn, all va- MLCHLGS as Wome er crore Xe 9:3) elec PIESh oO) P22) = 0.5. 126 eaves and enuUsSKsy- OG. sO) wees Gah 19-0 eT + Stripped stalks ..... (Osler ee Oranee tray nl4:Oi> 1085 4 Sweet. vaTiebiesi@-..antoeb= WS~ 295 4.4) 12:8 0.5. 21 Hay from grasses. Barley hay, cut in PIU arses eer etetae sere alee 15.0 4.2 88 24.7 449 2.4 1 Butitercups 2.4.20. Sis" o-O8 9 9.0 * 30:6) “I iS.0 2 Hay from mixed OTASSCS Teeth wis 2 15.3 | B.0-- 40.4. 2002, 42.0 225" 26 Italiam rye srass ..:.- 8:5 69 7.0 30:5 45.0 1-7 4 Johnson grass ...... NOPD e GME ies» 1280) 64D. eae 2 Kentucky blue grass. 21.2 63, 7.8 23.0 37.8 3.9 10 Kentucky blue grass, eut when seed in MC ose die cee 0.0 - 6. 24.0 34.2) 3.6 4 Kentucky blue grass, cut when seed ripe. 27.8 64 5.8 23.8 33.2 3.0 4 Hiimearian orassh..-),) 18 (a0) oo 2h-f) 49:0) - 2 <8 Meadow fescue ..... 20.0 6.8 7.0 25.9 384 2.7 9 Mixed grasses and (IGN GHEY Abstraction 129s don LOS 27-6) 40-3) 92.6) 7° 17, Oat hay, cut in milk. 15.0 5.2 9:3 29.2 39.0 2.3 1 Orchard grass ...... DOT COON as os-4e lO 26) 10 Perennial rye grass.. 14.0 7.9 10.1 25.4 40. 2.1 + £Prairie (native) 6.8 8.3 6.0) 30:1 -46:3 2.7 3 Red top, cut at differ- CNW GAS es en as cela es S929 0.2) 7.9) 28.6 47:5 1.9 9 Red top, cut in bloom 8.7 49 8.0 29.9 464 2.1 3 *Colorado bulletin 93. tAverage of Colorado, Kansas and Nebraska analyses. This hay is variable in composition because of mixed grasses. 394 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. TABLE I.—AVERAGE COMPOSITION OF AMERICAN FEEDING Strurrs.—Continued. Percentage composition. ~ «8 Nit Ether g Ss i ffs. be itro- e se Feading stuffs Water. | Ash. ra Sue gen-free| eX- 5 a : * | extract. | tract. « HAY FROM GRASSES.—Cont. Rowen (mixed) ..... 16.6 9 16:8) G/6922°59 39-4 onl Salt-marsh hay ..... 10.4: . 7.%- 5:5." 30.0" 44.1 % ota Swamp hay ......... LG” 6. 1-2 26.6) 45:9 220 8 Timothy, all analyses. 13.2 44 5.9 29.0 45.0 2.5 68 Timothy, cut in full BlOOT eos aoe 15.0.. 45° - GO. 29:6. 21.9% soir ae Timothy, cut soon after bloom’ <...-. 14.2), 5 4.4 [Osh ©2801 44.6 -) 3: Osan Timothy, cut when nearly FIPS ok. 55 14.1 3.9 50. 311-435 “Rae White daisy ........ TOSS) "GiGi 2 30.0) 6 42 oe 2 Wild-oat grass ...... 14.3 3.8 5.0 25.0 Roles ka" 1 Fresh grass. Barley fodder ...... 790 - 18) nT Ds SLO we eas 1 Barnyard millet... 75.0= dQ) 247 87.0) 30:6 2 Hungarian grass .... 71:1 - 137 “3.0 922) 1425) Cee Italian rye grass, com- ing into bloom.... 73.2 -2. 3.1 68 13.3 3 24 Japanese millet ..... 70.0 415 ~ 24 “C8 13a ee Kentucky blue grass. 65.1 28 41 9.1 176 13 18 Meadow fescue, in bloom o Aneta 69:9. - 1.8 “24. 108 2435-08 4 Oat fodder: ..2. .5).<:. $662.25) 2:55 937412, NOlS tes: 6 Orchard grass, in Je ibee sion de ado 73.0. -2.0- 26 °8,.2 43.3 . @9 4 Pasture grass ....... 80:0) 9 2:0: 3/5 4.0" = (9.7% se0s Seen Red top, in bloom. :..°65.3 2.3 2.8 11.0 17.7 0.9 5 Rye. fodder 2. 3.52 16:Gye Seer G se Grsrmem ca if Sorghum fodder .... 79.4 1.1 913 - 61 11.6. “O39 98 Tall oat grass, inbloom69.5 2.0 24 94 15.8 0.9 3 Timothy, different SUPTUST Meamiaato’s 6 Gai ne G16. 2 “Sas 20.25 elas Hay from legumes. Al faltareeereiseeahertks 84 74 14.3 25.0 42.7 2.2 21 Alsike clover ....... 97 §8.3..12.8- 25:6. 40:7 2:9 9 COWP Ce yc teeies ieee LOK: -f.0, 16:6" 20.1 64252 5 ee 8 Crimson clover ...... 916 8.65 15.2) 27.25 56:6) 2es 7 SEI unh lee hy mitoto ma cant 8.4 79 22.9 26.2 314 3.2 5 Japan clover ....... 11-0 -8:5 13:8 24/0 39205 Sain 2 Peanut vines (without TUES) eater eer 7.6 “10:8 10:70 28.6" “4257 ee4.6 6 APPENDIX. 395 TABLE I.—AVERAGE COMPOSITION OF AMERICAN FEEDING Sturrs.—Continued. Percentage composition. 38 Feeding stuffs. : Nitro- | Ether) 5= ss Water. | Ash. | fein. | fiber. |gen-free) ex: | 55 Hay rrom LEGUMES.—Cont. Bean VING)no.5 ere sss 2 HorO) eG.7% US 24.7 3% 2:3 1 ikedivelover <..5.-... 15.3 62 12.3 24.8 38.1 3.3, 38 Red clover, in bloom. 20.8 6.6 12.4 21.9 33.8 4.5 6 Red clover, mammoth. 21.2 Ga 107 24.5) 33:6 139 10 Salome sme kee LOO = Trois 14:8) 204, 39:5) 3:0 1 serra geltan. ..sy.fe 5 cs 9.2 7.2. 15.2 21.6 44.2 2.6 3 OV WEAN Tc: ep2 re, sss 2 1S safc, lots 22.5). -38.6 | Ded 6 Wiekchie sen eice.:: eee SO 7A IO; (019. 4 Cowpea re Siac te te 83:67 ki “24 48° or 0:4 +110 Grimson; clover: 2 2..7..80:9 i 3.1 5.2 e884 - 0:7 3 Marts Wea: yank shade 66:7 2.9 8:7 791822) 1.6 2 Horse bean |... cc. 2. SHI. Aes 28 £9 65s Ore 2 Red clover, different SUA ES soson pie.s oa es 70.8 Zell 4.4 oe Li bea iat 43 Serradella .......... 79.5 3-2 2.7 5.4 8.6 0.7 9 OVEDEAM as).,56 6s ete foes rahe 40)) Give SONG) ARO) 27, ' Straw. ATC ras cyeleyete\er steer aye ee ote is-9) 36:0) S90) ao, OF Buckwheat straw .... 9.9 5.5 wo 40.0) ebek 11333 3 ELorse- bean ss 3.6 OF Se 8837.6 s4.3% ade 1 (OEY eRe Soe cia elon ante 9:2 ~ 5: 4.0 37.0 42.4 2.3 12 (OR) HCW tgp econ 435 10:0-> 4:0 34:0) 36:2 1.5 «.. RIV Gea cyersrene Soke oss yA ies. S32) 3:0" 38:9 46:6) — 1:2 7 ovesheanwrsns cycerehra te HOS 5.8. HG 404. 3874 1.7 4 Wihedtit sec cack rrses 9:6), 4.20 (34) ©3811 24384 - 13 7 Wihteat Chait <2. + <<. 14.3 92 45 36.0 346 1.4 Silage. Apple pomace ...... Sones UG. dae) ~ on0 ° 8.8. «led. 1 Barnyard millet and Soy. bean ects orc ore Op ere Sin PS. Gee Teese O 9 Conn) Hk. Sasa ye sic Oe are ste 16-02 1100" "= 0.85 2-99 Corn and soybean... 76:0 24-25. 7:2 111 0:8 1 Cowpeanvinee reccmies Woo 6 .c-0) eee. 6.0" 7.6) 1.5 2 Cowpea and soy-bean vines, mixed ...... Gosia to mooie woo. LIGL e3 1 390 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. TABLE [I.—AVERAGE COMPOSITION OF AMERICAN FEEDING - Sturrs.—Continued. Feeding stuffs. SILAGE.—Cont. Field-pea vine ...... Reds clover). ance VO) Ne siete anciehe Serer Sorghum eres tae SOyCDGANi hs ace snctesien Roots and tubers. Artichoke: eco eee Beets, common ...... Beet, mangel Pumpkin (field) = Rh pw DH AD WN LS SRS ON re Go # bo OD ro NB ORO BCCI; eSU Satay reece Camrotes a. petra se es Basu avy see eter VELOC OY “ue reer eececke ease iuita-baAga eek en Sweet potato ......- MUTE TTL) v 9eNe eestor ye ence MISCELLANEOUS— ANCOIMN, ABTIIN! de aaa cee FAT DICS'5 s2ises, wWinto —_ SISO eo) ROS es art ROWAN RAM aw OCA NIre-: SUSU CU SFO: DOOR WwWwWRna: APPENDIX. ~ 397 TABLE I.—AVERAGE COMPOSITION OF AMERICAN FEEDING Sturrs.—Continued. ee Percentage composition . ~6 mn Feedi , 2 Nitro- | Ether] . eee Bers Water. | Ash. eee prude gen-free ex- s = : * | extract.| tract.| "a MiscELLANEOUS.—Cont. LN OL ive onion Aresesion 84.5% 2.0 2.3). 2.6 8.4. 0:5 2 Skim, milk, gravity... 90:4 0:7 3.3 ay tate AOE) SNe Skim milk, centrifugal 90.6 0.7 3.1 Oro en Oro 7 Sorghum bagasse soc eH) KD SOK ee Walk eae 2 PW SeaM ets tn (OOo IL) 16,2) ) oa.) 48-8 Fad i Sy OEE a ie eo ecuuioe ono font (4-0 2,004.9 12:7 0.8 1 .Sugar-beet leaves ... 88.0 2.4 26 2.2 44 -04 .. (RAMKAPe nce c sees 0.0" 18.7, ~ 44.1 Teo 4 ASG 3 ILE Y= Fetaes crc toseh te faites Sa OAL Ge Vs.02 |.) - OL. 46 Table II. Average Digestible Nutrients and Fer- tilizing Constituents in American Feed- ing Stuffs. The data of this table for the digestible nutrients are derived mainly from the preceding table and digestion coefficients obtained at American Experi- ment Stations. “In other cases they are from Bul- letin 22, Office of Experiment Stations, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington; Handbook for Farmers and Dairymen, Woll; Farm Foods, Wolff (English edition, Cousins); and Zu- sammensetzung der Futtermittel, Dietrich and Ko- nig. “The fertilizing constituents are principally from the Year Book for 1895, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, with additions from Wolff, Dietrich and Konig, and Bulletin 87, New Jersey Experiment Station. The table, as published, is taken from Henry’s “Feeds and Feeding,” by courtesy of the author, with exceptions as given in foot notes. Bulletins: Iowa (65), Indiana (108). 398 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. TABLE II.—DicEstTisL—E NUTRIENTS AND FERTILIZING Con- STITUENTS.—Continued. Digestible nutrients | Fertilizing constitu- Dry in 100 pounds. ents in 1,000 pounds. matter —— EE Name of feed. in100 | 5, |Carbo-| Ether | sitn| Phos- | pot pounds. | 270, | _by- Ex- on | Phoric| 49" drates | tract. Bens |S Kcidenmes CONCENTRATES. Lbs. Lbs. ibs: ibs. dibs. bs: abs: Barley )aiviocss nea 89.1 8.7 65.6 TG olpalt 7.9 4.8 Brewers” grains, wet. 24.3 3.9 9.3 14 89 31 0.5 Brewers’ grains, dried 91.8 15.7 363 5.1 36.2 10.3 0.9 Broom-corn seed ... 85.9 7.4 48.3 2.9 16.3 Buckwheat --..ksc.2 csne Se ie 74952 AGS) M44 ea ee Buckwheat hulls: '.. 86:8 235 27-9' 0:6. 4:9) }07 Sear Buckwheat bran .... 89.5 7.4 304 1.9 364 17.8 12:8 Buckwheat shorts ... 88.9 21.1 33.5 5.5 aoe wee Buckwheat middlings 87.3 22.0 334 5.4 42.8 21.9 11.4 Cocoanut meal ..... 89:7. 15.6 38.3: 10.5 32.8 T6:0) 240 Corn, all analyses... 89.1 7.9 66.7 4:3 18.2 7.0) 4 Corn; (dente. utc. (894 7-8" (G6 43 16 ee Age Gora aNts oars ace oa. 88:7 8:0 662 -4:3° 16.8 ie 4 Corn, sweets......:. 912 88° 63.7" 720 AS:6 i aes Corn wcobr woo ose 8953) = 04 52vo. Ota eor0 {65.6.0 Corn and cob meal.. 84.9 4.4 60.00 2.9 14.1 5.7 4.7 Corn. bran) .32. 2.2... 90:9 —7.4 59'S) -226% 16:3) “2a os Cotton seed 2. 22.0. 89:7 1835-3030" ies Sikes) Laie en Cotton-seed meal .... 91.8 37.2 16.9 12.2 67.9 28.8 8.7 Gotton-seed hulls <2. S89) O39 335) 1h 9 6:9) 2 ome Cowpea: 4. . acc once ene 85.2 18.3 54.2 10 33:3 nee sxe Dark feeding flour.. 90.3 13.5 61.3 2.0 31.8 21.4 10.9 Max «seed aan sitet. « 90:8) 206) 17a 929.0). 3610 sao Om Germ ameéalese ae 89:56 --9.0 G12 “62> 26:5. ‘S/O eeart Gluten meal ....... O18) 258) 43:3) BkOL, SOS) tools Glucose meal ...... 91-9) 3028) 935.3) B45 ET, ase eh Gluten feed ....... 99.9 20.4. 48.4.~- 8:8 38:4 4a Ors Grano-gluten ....... 94.3 26.7 38.8 12.4 49.8 5.1. 1.5 High-grade flour ... 87.6 89 624 09 189 22 1.5 Hominy chops ...... 88:9. -:7.5). 55:2) 16:8) 16:3) OS eae Horse bean ........ 85.7 22.4 °49:3 2) 40575 120 eg Reafir vcore fees 8438 > TESST ede eee a a Linseed meal, old process .......:.:. 90.8 29.3 32.7 7.0 543 166 918m Linseed meal, new PrOCess skeet Se 89.9 28.2 40.1 2.8 &7.8 18.3 13.9 Low-grade flour .... 87.6 8.2 62.7 0.9 289 56 3.5 Malt sprouts ....... 89:8 T8iG Sil eT 35:5, elie Millet: 2 . cites aislaeons 86.0. 8:9 94520 . 3:2 "20/47 {Sioa Oats reste nae 89.0. 9%: “4753. 472) 20:6) 7Si2eore Oat dust eer 03:5) "89" 38:4 od 2G eee BOC APPENDIX. 399 TABLE I[1.~—DIGESTIBLE NUTRIENTS AND FERTILIZING CON- STITUENTS.—Continued. Digestible nutrients | Fertilizing constitu- Dry in 100 pounds. ents in 1,000 pounds. Name of feed. Carbo- Pro- bh Ether r Pho: y- me Nitro- drates tract. | eens CONCENTRATES.—Cont. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. @at feed or shorts... 92:3 12.5 46.9 2.8 17.2 -9.1 5.3 Matehulllsy een ae 90'6. 13 40 O16) 5:2) 24> 5.2 MabemiGal ie! ocr. <)he' & Oona ol o.9) 23.08 a. om Palm-nut meal ..... 89.6 16.0: 52:6 - 9.0 26.9. 11.0 5:0 Cash Featsts tien s)s io 89:5, AES bus” OF -80:8' ‘82-919 Peanut meal ....... SOs) 42:92 22:8) 6:9) VaG 23a 1520 Rape-seed meal ..... 90.0 25.2 23.7 -7.5 49.6 20.0 13.0 PORCE) sith co ies ortin saat Si.Ga eLi8 Tee, 20:3: 10:8). 1.82 0:9 Lie ALANS ae en oe abe Oise, UG 44 5a" 0% 68 1.7 > aA IRTCe ADT, utara e eos ts DOMSieemor ot Aol arian t.Dy - P29) 24 RACES POLISH eircrce.:s oct SOLOS S0F SG:Ase Gori9.7 2a 7.1 EGY Cig tots 2 nro oteele nia) os SBAyy OOP G76 Ly eG Bis, 54 uve ONAN eye cers crore 88:4 11.5 50.3 2.0 23.2 22.8 14.0 TRE SOL DSS 50 «728-216-178 SOM OS 45 Ge 184 12/6) S8el Soja (soy) bean.... 89.2 29.6 22.3 14.4 53.0 18.7 19.9 Sorghum seed ...... Siro On bo 3 1e- 4.8). Sal eae Starcherefuse <....... 91.8) 11.4 58:4 G5 22:4 7.0 5.2 Sugar meal =... .::..: O32 US ienodad 2 8s o6-00 4:1) 87055 Sunflower seed ..... 92.5 12.1 20.8 29.0 22.8 12:2 5.6 Sunflower-seed cakes. 91.8 31.2 19.6 12.8 55.5 21.5 11.7 \WHIGERES Shee oc oases 895i 102692) © 1 923.6. 5 7.9 ~ 75.0 Wheat bran ........ SS S22 392 257 268% 2 280) 16a Wheat bran, spring Wheath “2.8 Seco 88.5 12.9 40.1 3.4 Wheat bran, winter Weal teenies os Sites oreo lel 2:6— sox Fe Sas Wheat middlings.... 87.9 12.8 53.0 34 263 9.5 6.3 Wheat shorts .....-. 88.2 12.2 50.0 3.8 28.2 135 5.9 Wheat screenings... 88.4 9.8 510 .2.2 244 11.7 8.4 RouGHAGE— Corn stover, field GUnGGh See ee nos 59:5 1 «632.4 - 0.7 104 2.9 14.0 Fodder corn, field Genel SSA so oecules Dion 2.0 O46, deo ly-6) “5:4 F839 Hodder-corn, ereen:. 20:7 1.0 °11e€ O04 42 15 3:3 *Kafir corn stover, site Gl @ubdee| Banoo SG eon 4 OM OO ieitsecis Usrasealn Teles *Average of Kansas and Oklahoma tests, 400 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. TABLE II.—DIGESTIBLE NUTRIENTS STITUENTS.—Continued. Dry matter Name of feed. in 100 pounds. RoOUGHAGE—Cont. Lks Sorghum (cane).... 94.2 Fresh grass. Greens barley ea. .cen Hungarian grass.... 2 Kentucky blue grass. 34. Meadow fescue, in bloomy 2s...e-sece. 30.1 Oats fodders. sect moles Orchard grass, in blOomMs ee eee 27.0 Pasture grasses, mixed 20.0 Peastandroatse on --1- 16.0 Peas and barley .... 16.0 Redtop, in bloom.... 34.7 Rye fodder 0p 72> 1002" eS erie ees IPOVENO Sais ae eco Sac 2b 009). 1653>. (OF poesia eens Parsnipycs aces tees 1, 1.62 luo OP ee Se Siaee ot) mace Ruta-baga ey. ...+..5 V4 210 © Sil) 0D tO aa eee MISCELLANEOUS— : - Acorns, reshw nts. 447 = 2.0 B44 ~ Any sea Hae Boe Buttermilk 9.9) oL9 er aOie wills 48 snl ee) Cabbase se. crrecretis 1530 18 518:2" 04.) 3-809 alee Cows mle sevens ey. 12:8) 36,9 4-95 35) 9 eoso le nee Cow’s milk, colostrum 25.4 17.6 2.7 3.6 28.2 66 1.1 Beet spulp aseke. «x. OL OG eS co) Sdd 9 1022) ee Beet molasses ..... (een BI ius 0 146 0.5 56:3 Dried@bloodit.s=- 915, 52:3 -0\ e270) 135.05 alot meamerd Dried Mish wera a SO eal 0 LOS 2 7 7-on 12 00220 Wea teserapr.. aes So on oor co lan /melllsye ye). 10 Prickly. comfrey. .2.. 116 54.41) -4.6)) 10.2" 4.2 5 sis Pumpkin, field ..... VEE KOE Geer Okay obs bat ie Pumpkin, garden’... 19:2 * Fa “8:3” 0.8. “ia deep RAD O's alenee cheats satel 1450), eo 8 10:25 42D elcome Skim milk) gravity... 9:6, 3.1.° “4.7 2°08) 5.6. | 2s0eeies Skim milk, centrifugal] 94 2.9) 25) 03) 9516) eee O EO POET Ye i acsayetemeey te 20:05, 1.5.2 OSS NOI =e 37S etme Sugar-beet. leaves ....-1210 1.7- 4:6 0:2 435” Wpaee SMamikale Gwen cierecterster 93:0) olege aloeos oallsG a WAiWA BGeonsc Risraioeers G6) 0:85 24.77 10:3) 5) aes ~ *Digestion coefficients for dried blood used. Table III. Feeding Standards for Farm Animals. The German Feeding Standards have long been in general use as guides in compounding rations for farm animals. As mentioned in previous pages, there is now a prevailing impression among Ameri- can investigators that these standards call for more protein than is actually needed for best results. American investigations point to the conclusion that, for conditions such as prevail in this country, APPENDIX. 403 a slight reduction of protein is to be recommended, though just how much it is impossible to say. A reduction of 10 per cent does not seem unreason- able. With a liberal use of corn, which is relatively high in fat, American rations necessarily show a higher percentage of fat than is specified in the Ger- man standards. Professor Henry, in his admirable book on “Feeds and Feeding,” from which the tables in this appendix are taken, with exceptions as stated in foot notes, says: “The table of feeding standards here presented is taken from Mentzel & Lengerke’s Landw. Kalender for 1898. It comprises the standards originally prepared by Dr. Emil v. Wolff for that publication, modified by Dr. C. Lehmann. “The standards are arranged to meet the require- ments of farm animals under normal conditions. The student should not accept the statements in the standards as absolute, but rather as data of a helpful nature to be varied in practice as circum- stances suggest.” “The statements in the column headed ‘Dry Mat- ter’ should be regarded as approximate only, since the digestive tract of the animal readily adapts it- self to variations of 10 per cent or more from the standard of volume. _ “The column headed, ‘Sum of Nutrients,’ combines the data of the three preceding columns, the ether extract being multiplied by 2.4 before adding. In the first column of this division of the table, marked “Crude Fiber=1,” all the digestible nutrients are included. In the second division, marked “Crude Fiber=¥,” it is generally assumed that about 30 per cent of the digestible non-nitrogenous nutrients consists of crude fiber, and one-half of this, or 15 per cent, is deducted. Rations containing much 404 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. coarse forage should therefore be somewhat in- creased, because of their lower nutritive value. “The standards are for animals of normal size. Those of small breeds will require more nutrients, amounting in some cases to .3 of a pound of nitro- genous and 1.5 pounds of non-nitrogenous digesti- ble nutrients daily for 1,000 pounds of live weight of animals. “Narrowing the nutritive ratio in feeding full- grown animals is for the purpose of lessening the depression of digestibility, to enliven the temper- ment, or to increase the production of milk at the expense of laying on fat. “The different ‘Standards given for the same class of animals according to performance illustrate the manner and direction in which desirable changes should be made. “In considering the fattening standards the stu- dent should bear in mind that the most rapid fat- tening is usually the most economical, so that the standards given may often be profitably increased. “Standards for milch cows are given for the mid- dle of the lactation period with animals yielding milk of average composition. “The standards for growing animals contemplate only a moderate amount of exercise; if. much is taken, add 15 per cent—mostly non-nitrogenous nutrients—to the ration. If no exercise is taken, deduct 15 per cent from the standard.” APPENDIX. 405 TABLE III.—FErEpING STANDARDS FOR FARM ANIMALS. Per day per 1,000 pounds live weight. K Digestible nutrients. = 3 E : : Sum of © . mb oe Animal FS A! aa 8 nutrients En 2 ss 28 ==] ES P| me | O | Crude fiber 3 A oe 3 wo} =1 =% All 1. Oxen. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Ad rest in stalls... ils} (ier SAE (aT te) are STB Ite} AMISH ERWOTK 1). met cee alee 1OL0S 2053) Los 9.708 07 Atenednim! wWork..7:0 20) e20h dike) | 0:5 t4.7 = 12/0) ~ 6:5 At heavy work...... 267 2-8 daar OS 17.7 = 10,0 75.3 2 Fattening cattle. BIrSt PeTIOG! sor. . « se « SOc oO meOLDy -LSafen lo:Gu 5 Oro Second period ...... 50) 3:0 are Oli Ole eI eOn o:4: Third period ....... 26. 2. ae Ot e POAT) ER2, 6.2 3. Milch cows. When yielding daily— HQ) pounds: of mmilk. 25-16) 10:0) 0:3) 12:3. 10:2, 6:7 16.6 pounds of milk. 27 2.0 11.0 04 140 12.2 6.0 22.0 pounds of milk. 29 2.5 13.0 0.5 16.7 144 5.7 27.5 pounds of milk. 32 3.3 13.0 0.8 18.2 16.0 4.5 4, Sheep. Coarse wool ........ 20 Ree SOLS py enOt See be O! Olen O51 ESITTG OOM its «fat erie; <0 s 2a) lib 1230) 10:3) 14:25. 12.0) 18:5 5. Breeding ewes. WathSlambsi 22. -./. . peo oO. 0:p" OMS Gis) 5:6 6. Fattening sheep. Pirst) periad 6. fos. es. 90). .9.0..15.0 0.5. 19:2.-16.5 — 5.4 Second period ...... 28 32. 14.0. 0:6" 19:4 516:9. 4.5 7. Horses. 5 lien AKO Fo. oooon 20e ede 9:5) 04 eal 0) 10:0) = 7.0 Medium work ...... 24> 5210-0) OG) 4.5 - 12:8) 26:2 Heavy; GWOPKs fers. <0 269 2258 lospeO.Se ten p-b) 6-0 8. Brood sows ........ 22 2.5 15.5 0,4 19.0 6.6 9. Fattening swine. BIESte period! =. cr.-)ac1 Boy 4:58 620.0) 2057, 31.2 5.9 Second period ...... 32 4.0 24.0 1 0.5 29.2 6.3 Mhind Ss period 2--../. 25 2.7 18.0 0.4 22.0 7.0 10. Growing cattle. - Dairy breeds. A Eat Vole OP a LS Ole Ses 23, 4:0. 13.0) 2:0 2158 21:0 4:5 DAN Oive gress BOO eset 24s Ob plo ome te OlelS one oli Om oak Galore GMa is Tie Ouateton sOtoplo ie als. Gs8 12 ES eee OO er, 26) aS Lb a? 04 2153) 12-8 S75 18-24 = LOVE Gove 26° 1.5 12.0 0:3 14.2 28 8.5 406 PROFITABLE STOCK FEEDING. TABLE III.—FErpiInc STANDARDS FOR FARM. ANIMALS. Per day per 1,000 pounds live weight. " Digestible nutrients. er, Ani : 3 Sum of ce mal F nutrients mA Pe Crude fiber A =l =% 11. Growing cattle. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Beef breeds. De ROinea py ae L6Q2 66. 4287742". 1810) 210 e200) eee ree ee SG eh BOS can Da Sibe W258) Se OO Ol eon Gale aoe 550.20... 25, 204 lise Ok aS LoS eGo TESS eecor (Si Doe ats 3 242.0 12:5) 10:5) W527 dS: mors A ee Beers Cert G5 Oma 24° ~ 1.8 2.0 “0.4 14.8 © 13 2 en 12. Growing sheep. Wool breeds. AmIGi (0 15:0 iz eee 14, Growing swine. Breeding stock. De aan RVeceee 44- 7.6 28.0 1.0 38.0 4.0 SPU loi aat £00.52 Bee peak ees 30.0 5.0 Dan Gruaeteres LOS. hes. pe mrcn en priest (ie! 26.0 6.0 Tate Rae sche 200k) 28 12.8 © Lae. OS 22.2 7.0 Sl ne siesets 25) (eras 2b (2ly 2ib.a.~ 022 17.9 7.9 15. Growing, fattening swine. Es cri Savion As G20 C0 38.0 4.0 D2uOe wget 1OORRe. = Se aK BIL (Oe, 30.0 5.0 B= Gee cere BOE eee 33) 4.3 223; — 10:6 28.0 5.5 pea de cee AND Lao - 30 3.6 205 04 25.1 6.0 ee oto. 5 oS soce 26 3.0 183 0.3 22:0 oh eu es INDEX Alfalfa hay for beef cattle, 175. for chickens, 341. for cows, 56. for horses, 373. for pigs, 284. for sheep, 227. culture of, 386. Alfalfa pasture for cows, 98. for pigs, 276. for poultry, 33. for sheep, 210. Animal requirements, 10. aaa dependent upon plants, Ash, 14. Baby beef, 150. arguments for, 150. feed after weaning for, 153. feed, the first winter for, 153. finishing on grass, 154. heifer calves for, 154, skim-milk calves for, 154. whole-milk calves vs. skim- milk calves for, 152. Bacon hogs, score-card of, 259. Balanced ration, 23. Barley, 93. for beef cattle, 186. for horses, 368. for pigs, 293. for sheep, 243. Bedding for cattle, 147. Beef and milk production com- bined, 138. Beef carcass, 115. bone, 118. ort weight, percentage of, 114. high priced meat, 115. marbling, 119 ; meat fiber, 120. quality in meat, 115. requirements of, 115. Beef cattle, 113. (See steers.) alfalfa for, 175. barley for, 186. bedding for, 147. bran for, 187. eane for, 186. eareass of, 115. chaffed hay for, 189. ee ena stock foods for, 7 corn fodder for, 178. corn silage for, 181, ee cattle, corn stover for, tt. corn substitutes for, 186. cottonseed meal for, 187. erushed corn for, 188. dipping for lice, 149. early Maturity. importance of, 126. cary maturity, indications of, 27 easy keepers, 130. evenness of flesh in, i19. external indications of gain- ing capacity, 121. feed-lot for, 146. - feeder requisites, 120. gaining propensity, 121. gains depend upon type rath- er than breed, 123. grinding grain for, 188. high priced meat, 115. ideal beef steer, 128. Kafir corn for, 186. lean desirable, 119. maturity of, 126. meat fiber, texture in, 120. oats for, 186, protein foods for, 187. sale of, 184. salt for, 44%, score-card for, 132. shelter for stock cattle, 145. shelter problem in, 143. shelter tests, 144. shipment of cattle, 184. shredded corn fodder for, 188. shredded stover for, 188. silage for, 181. sorghum fox, 186. steer feeding, 143. stock cattle, shelter for, 145. stock foods for, 187. three-year-old range _ steers, 183. two-year-old range steers, 174. types of, 113. water for, 148. wheat meal for, 186. when to sel, 184. ~ yearlings, 156. Beet leaves, 91. Beet pulp, 89. for beef cattle, 183. for sheep, 229. Blue grass, 97. Boars, feed for, 271. types of, 255, 258. 408 INDEX. Bone, 8, 118. Chickens, feeding in winter, Bran, 84, 187. Sao. Breed tests, 125. houses for, 335. Brewers’ grains, 83. indigestion, how prevented, Brome grass, 98. 343. Brood sows, 261. industry in America, future alfalfa for, 266. of, 344. feed after farrowing for, 267. feed before farrowing for, 265. large houses for, 264. pasture for, 268. portable house for, 262. winter quarters for, 262. Brood mare, 377. Bull, 134. prepotency of, 134. selection of, 134. Cabbages, 92. Calculating rations, 28. Calves, 103. rations for, 157. Cane, 87, 181, 186, 371. Canadian field peas, 84. Carbohydrates, 15. Chaffed hay, 189. Cheap roughage, utilization of, 5. Chicks, 321. bread for, 322. brooder houses, for, 317. coops for, 317. dry food for, 321. feeding of, 321, 326. moist food for, 322. overfeeding, 324. racks for feeding, 324. Chickens, 309. alfalfa for, 341. Asiatic breeds, 314. beets for, 341. bloodmeal for, 340. cabbage for, 340. eharcoal for, 327, 351. classification of fowls, 311. cleanliness, importance of, 3438. clover for, 341. cockerels, fattening, 327. colds, how prevented, 343. colds, remedy for, 318. corn feeding, dangers of, 338. diarrhea in chicks, 326; in fowls, 332. disease preventives, 343. disinfectants for, 321. Douglass mixture for, 326. dust-box for, 328. eggs, feeding for in winter, 336. fowls, care in summer, 328. general-purpose breeds, 312. grain for, 328. green food for, 324, 340. grit for, 323, 331. ground bone for, 327, 340. hens, feeding in summer, 331 ; kerosene emu!sion for, 330. laying breeds, 311. lice, 320, 328. meat for, 340. meat breeds, 314. Mediterranean breeds, 311. method of feeding, 342. mites, 329. moist food for, 322. moulting, 531. nest bugs, 351. oyster shell, 227, 331. practical for farmer, 309. ae animal, 321, 327, 332, rape for, 331. salt for, 342. sand for, 3281. setting eggs. 315. shelter for, ?11. silage for, 341. sitting hens, care cf, 315. skim-milk for. 321, 326, 5406. system, need of in America, 344. water fcr. 525, 343. water fountains for, 325, 348. wood ashes for, 231. ; Clover hay for cows, 77. for pigs, 290. for lambs, 227. for horses, 373. for chickens, 341. Clover pasture, 98. for sheep, 208. for poultry, 331. Commercial protein foods for cows, 80. for beef cattle, 187. Condimental stock foods, 94. for beef cattle, 187. for pigs, 303. for poultry, 332. Cooking feed for pigs, 805. Corn.g5>) or increase in nutrients during maturity, 70. method of harvesting, 72. time to harvest, 70. Corn fodder for cows, 60, for beef cattle, 178. for sheep, 235. Corn silage, 60, (see silage.) economy of storage of, 61. for beef cattle, 181. for horses, 371. for sheep, 228. Corn stover for cows, 58. for beef cattle, 177. for horses, 3871. INDEX. Corn substitutes, 92. for beef cattle, 186. for pigs, 293. for sheep, 245. Cottonseed meal tle, 187. for cows, 80. for lambs, 227. for horses, 370. for pigs, 283. Cowpeas, 83, 381. Cowpea hay, 77. Crude fiber, 164. Crushed corn, 188. Cuts of beef, i116. for beef cat- Dairy bull, score-card for, 44. Dairy cow, 37, 38. abusive treatment of, 101. alfalfa hay for, 56. alfalfa vs. commercial protein foods for, 57. alfalfa pasture for, 98. barley for, 93. beet leaves for, 91. beet pulp for, 89. bluegrass for, 97. brome grass pasture for, 98. eabbages for, 92. Canadian peas for, 84. clover hay for, 77. clover pasture for, 98. condimental stock foods for, 94. corn fodder for, 60. eorn for,- 55. corn silage for, 60. corn stover for, 58. corn substitutes for, 92, cottonseed meal for, 80. cowpeas for, 83. cowpea hay for, 77. dried molasses beet pulp for, 90. dried brewers’ grains for, 83. early spring pasture for, 97. emmer for, 93. feeding standards for, 52. fly remedies for, 99. fresh water for, 100. gluten feed for, 84. gluten meal for, 82. grain on pasture for, 98. Hungarian grass for, 87. Kafir corn for. 93. legumes for, 55. linseed meal for, 81. malt sprouts for, 83. middlings for, 85. millet hay for, 87. nutrients for, 49. nutrients for, influenced by quantity of milk, 51. nutrients for, influenced by per cent of fat, 51. nutritive ratio for, 49. 409 - Dairy cow, oat straw for, 88. oats for, $4. oil meal for, 81. prairie hay for, 87. pron esble western ration for, ‘ proportion of roughness to concentrates for, 53. protein foods for, 86. quantity of foods for, 48. ration for, 76, 86. red clover for, 77. roots for, $2. roughage for, 87, 89. rye for, 93. rye pasture for, 97. rye straw for, 88. salt for, 100. score-card for, 42. shelter in summer for, 100. silage for, 60. soiling for, 98. sorghum for, 87. soy bean hay for, 77. soy bean meal for, 83. speltz for, 93. spring pasture for, 97. succulent feeds for, 54. sugar cane for, 87. summer pasture for, 97. timothy hay for, 8ST. variety in the roughage for, 88. water for, 100. wheat bran for, 84. wheat for, 93. wheat pasture for, 97. wheat shorts for, 85. wheat straw for, 88. Dairy industry, 37. Dairy type, 39. Dison determination of, Digestible nutrients of foods, 19. Digestive apparatus, 19. Dipping cattle, 149; pige, 306. Disinfectants, 306. Dreaeee weight, percentage of, Dried molasses beet pulp, for sheep, 230. Dry cows, feeding of, 100. Dry sows, feed for, 269. 90; Early maturity, 126. Egg, composition of, 9. Emmer, 93. for pigs, 294. for sheep, 243. Energy, source of, 362. Enjoyment, source of, 5. Exercise, 36. Farm animals, living factories, 7. Farmer’s cow, 136. Fats in plants, 14. AIO INDEX. Fatty tissues, 8. Feeder requisites, 120. Feeding standards, 24, 52. Feed-lot for cattle, 146; for sheep, 224. Field peas, 84. Flax straw, 183. Flesh, evenness of, 119. Food constituents, 12. Food of maintenance, 10. I'resh cow, feeding of, 101. Gaining capacity, 121. German standards, 24, 52. Gluten feed, 84. Gluten meal, 82. for pigs, 299. Grinding grain for beef cattle, 188. for pigs, 303. for horses, 377. Guineas, 353. Hogs, 2538. (See pigs.) bacon type of, 258. breeds of, 255. breeding herd of, 261. digestive capacity of, 260. extent of industry, 253. lard type of, 255. types of, 253. Home market for crops, 4. Hungarian grass, 87. (See mil- let.) Horses, 357. alfalfa hay for, 373. barley for, 368. bedding for, 378. brood mare, feed for, 376. eane for, 371. clover hay for, 373. coach type oi, 360. colts, feed for, 377. cornstalks for, 371. cottonseed meal for, 370. draft type of, 357. feed in summer for, 364. feed in winter for, 368. grinding grain for, 377. Kafir corn for, 369. Kafir corn fodder for, 371. millet hay for, 372. molasses for, 369. oat hay for, 372. oat substitutes for, 366. oil meal for, 367. prairie hay for, 371. protein requirements for, 363. roadster, feed for, 375. roadster type of, 360. salt for, 378. score-card for, 358. shelter for, in summer, 378. shelter for, in winter, 378. sorghum for, 371. straw for, 372. Horses, watering of, 377. wintering of, 375. winter rations for, 368. Ideal beef steer, 130. Inferior steer, 122. Kafir corn, 93. for beef cattle, 186. for pigs, 295. for horses, 369. Labor, distribution of, 5. Lambs, alfalfa hay for, 227. alfalfa pasture for, 210. barley for, 243. bedding for, 223. beet pulp for, 229. bloat in, 218. clipping, 237. clover hay for, 227. clover pasture for, 208. corn fodder, 235. corn silage for, 228. cottonseed meal for, 227. dried beet pulp for, 230. dried molasses beet pulp for, 230. early spring, 203. emmer for, 2438. epee station tests with, feed-lot for, 224. grain feeding for, 203, 206. grain with clover for, 209. grain troughs for, 209. hay racks for, 221. housing facilities for, 204. late, 206. millet hay for, 228. oats for, 244. oats and peas for, 219. oil meal for, 227. pasture for, 208. prairie hay for, 228. protein roughage for, 227. quantity of feed for, 232. range, 232. rape feeding, value of, 215. rape after wheat for, 214; in oats, 215; in corn, 217. rape pasture for, 212. roots for, 229. rye straw for, 231. sale of, 238. - salt for, 223: sereenings for, 244. self-feeder for, shock corn for, 235. shelter for, 220. shredded fodder for, 236. sorghum hay for, 228. speltz (see emmer). straw for, 228. INDEX. Lambs, sugar beet pulp for, timothy for, 228. water for, 22. wheat for, 244. wheat straw for, 231. winter, 202. winter rations for, 225. young, care of, 204. Lean of meat, 8, 119. Legumes, 55. Liberal feeding, importance of, ai. Lice, 149. Linseed meal, S81. Maintenance ration, 10. Malt sprouts, 83. Meat carcasses, 8, 104. Meat as food, 113. Meat fiber, 120. Middlings, 85. Milk, 9. fat of, 9 mineral of, 9. protein of, 9 sugar of, 9. Milk production, 37, 45, 48. Milk production vs. beef preduc- tion, 37. Millet, 87, 182, 293, 372. Mineral matter, 14. Molasses, 369. Mules, 361. Mutton type, 194. Nitrogenous compounds, 16. Nutritive ratio, 21. Oats for beef cattle, 186. for cows, 94. for iambs, 244. for pigs, 295. for horses, 365. for steers, 186. Oat hay, 372. Oat straw, 88. for beef cattle, 182. Oil meal, 81. Palatability, 32. Pasture for cows, 97. with grain for steers, 165. for lambs, 208. for sows, 268. for pigs, 275. Plant oils, 14. aes 253. alfalfa hay for, 284. ae hay (last cutting) for, alfalfa pasture for, 276. barley for, 293. cane seed for, 295. charcoal and ashes for, 305. cleanliness in pens, 306. clover hay for, 290. 4II Pigs, clover pasture for, 275. condimental stock foods for, 3038. cooked feed for, 305. corn silage for, 296. corn substitutes for, 293. cottonseed mea: for, 283. disinfectants for, 306. dipping for lice, 306. dried blood for, 302. exercise for, 307. fall pigs, 278. feed for before weaning, 270. feed for when first weaned, 274. frosted wheat for, 294, gluten meal for, 299. grinding grain for, 303. hay rack for, 288. heavy feed of, 276. Jerusalem artichokes for, 296. Kafir corn for, 295. linseed meal for, 283, 299. mangel-wurzel for, 303. middlings for, 281. millet seed for, 293. oats for, 295. oil meal for, 299. potatoes for, 296. protein foods for. rape for, 275. rutabaga for, 303. rye for, 294. shelter for, 280. shorts for, 281. skim-milk for, 284. 283, 298. soaking grain for, 305 sorghum seed for, 295 soy bean meal for, 283 sugar beets for, 296. Summer feed of, 27 tankage for, 301. water, 307. weight of to market, 290. wet vs. dry meal for, 304. wheat for, 294. wheat screenings for, 294. winter rations for, 28T: Portable hog iiouse, 262. Prairie hay, 87. for steers, 182. for sheep, 228. for horses, 371. Prepotency, 134. Protein, 16. Protein foods, classes of, 86. when needed, 163, 283. Protein roughage for sheep, 227, steers, 174. Quantity of food, 31. Quietness, 36. Range steers, 172. Rape for sheep, 212. feeding value of, 215. 412 Rape for poultry, 331. for pigs, 275. Regularity in feeding, 35, Rye, 93. for pigs, 294. Rye pasture, 97. Rye straw, 88, 231. Roots, 92, 1838, 229, Salt for calves, 112. for beef cattle, 147. for chickens, 342. for cows, 100. for sheep, 223. for horses, 379. Score-card beef cattle, 132. for dairy bulls, 44. for dairy cows, 43. for lard hog, 255. for bacon hog, 259. for draft horse, 358. for sheep, 196. Self-feeder for sheep, 224. Sheep, 191 (see lambs). bloat in, 212. breeding flock, 200. digestive capacity of, 197. dog, difficulty with, 193. ewe, feed for. 208, 205. extensive scale, 239. feeding in semiarid West, 239. fences for, 199. gestation period of, 202. housing of, 204 nodular disease in, 248, outlook for, 191 parasites in, 248. stomach worm in, 248, temperament of, 193. yearlings, 238. Shelter tests, 144. Shoats, 274. feed for, 274. rape for, 275. clover for, 275. Shock corn, 178, 235. Shorts, 85, 281. Shredded stover, 188. Silage, 60. Silage fed liberally, 74. for steers, 181. for chickens, 341. Silo, 62. capacity of, 64. corn best crop ‘for, 67, 72. cost of, 67. cost of filling, 73. cowpeas for, 68. filling, 72. form of, 63. location of, 63. Droportion and capacity of, 4 stage of ripeness of corn for, table showing capacity of, 66. INDEX, Skim-milk calves, 103. calf feeders for dain: cost of raising, 110. . dehorning, 111. early feeding of, 104. fat substitutes for, 105. “feeding buckets for, 105. flaxseed meal for, 106. grain feeding of, 107, 109. heavy vs. moderate feeding of, 108. pasture for, 110, quantity of "grain for, 108. roughness for, 110. salt for, 112. scours in, 104. shelter for, 111. stanchions for, 106. warming skim- ‘milk for, 105. water for, al be weaning, 110. whole milk vs. 103. Snapped corn, 180. Soil fertility, maintaining, 3. Soiling, 98. Sore mouths, 181. Sorghum hay, 87, 181, Sorghum seed, 93. Soy bean meal, 83. for pigs, 283. Soy bean hay, 77, 384. Speltz (see emmer). Stable construction for cows, 46. Standards, feeding, 24, Starch, 16. Steers, two-year-olds, 172. (See beef cattle.) beet pulp for, 183. cane for, 181. corn silage for, 181. corny oe with alfalfa for, 7 early graia feeding 172. flax straw for, 183. grain on pasture for, 165. millet hay for, 182. oat straw for, 182. prairie hay for, 182. protein roughage vs. protein concentrates for, 174 roots for, 183. shock corn for, 178. snaped corn for, 180. sore mouths in, 181. sorghum hay for, 181. timothy hay for, 182. wheat straw for, 182. winter feeding, 172. winter rations for, 172. skim-milk for, 228, 371. Steers, yearlings, 156. character of the ration for, 162. fall and winter feeding of, 161 fall feeding on grass, 170. INDEX. Steers, yearlings, grain the first winter for, 157. grain ration on grass for, 165. protein concentrates for, 163. tabulated rations for, 160. Stock foods. (See condimental stock foods.) Sugar, 16. Swine (see hogs), 253. Timothy hay, 87. or steers, 182. for sheep, 228, Turkeys, 346. blackhead, 346. difficulty with, 347. feeding of, 351. grit for, 352. hepatitis in, 346. profits in, 350. varieties of, 353. 413 Turkeys, vitality’ of, diminish- ing, 346. Water for cows. 100. for calves, 112. for steers, 148. for sheep, 223. for horses, 378. for chickens, 225, 343. for pigs, 807. Wheat, 93. for beef cattle, 186. for sheep, 244. for pigs, 294. Wheat bran, 84. Wheat shorts, 85, 281. Wheat straw, 88, 182, 231. Winter lambs, £02. Winter milk production, 45. Winter shelter for cows, 45. Wool, 9. VAIO ANTNTA OOOOSd44416b