ssasSififf STATE LIBRARY

°"?.""':,?,f;°"°,'.'::'"'yneservo,r water

3 0864 00054809 2

This report was funded by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) , U.S. Department of Energy, as part of BPA's program to protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife affected by the development and operation of hydroelectric facilities on the Columbia River and its tributaries. The views in this report are the author's and do not necessarily represent the views of

BPA .

For copies of this report, write:

Bonneville Power Administration

Division of Fish and Wildlife Public Information Officer - PJ P.O. Box 3621 Portland, OR 97208

Quantification of Libby Reservoir Levels Needed to Maintain or Enhance Reservoir Fisheries

APPEM)ICES for

Annual Report FY 1984

by:

Bradley B. Shepard - Project Biologist Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks

P.O. Box 67 Kalispell, Montana 59901

Prepared for: Richard Harper, Project Manager

U.S. Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration Division of Fish and Wildlife Portland, Oregon

Contract Number: DE-A179-84BPA12660 BPA Project: BPA 83-467

Digitized by tine Internet Arcliive

in 2015

https://arcliive.org/cletails/quantificationof1984mont

APPENDIX A Stream habitat inventory procedures

al^iCM'^iMW.^IEOTT OF

mHM, WIIJ9IJFE AXU PARKS

STREAM HABITAT INVEINTORY PROCEDURES

Fisheries Research and Special Projects Bureau

Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks

P.O. Box 67 Kalispell, Montana 59903

June 1983

\

LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE PAGE

1 U.S. Forest Service Stream Reach Inventory and

Channel Stability Evaluation Form . . 2

2 Helicopter Stream Survey Report 4

3 Form FMD-I for general field and office data ....... 5

4 Field Transect form FMD-J 8

Appendix A:

1 Stream Cross Section 11

2 Bank Forms 12

3 Confinement 14

4 l>-90 and Intermediate Axis 15

5 Channel Patterns 20

6 Valley Profile 24

Appendix B:

1 Interagency Stream Fishery Input Data Form 37

.S'2f ;-:'9: ,i'v.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

INTRODUCTION 1

METHODS 1

AERIAL SURVEY 1

GROUND SURVEY , 3

DATA ENTRY AND ANALYSIS 7

LITERATURE CITED 9

APPENDIX A: Glossary of terminology used in stream habitat

surveys 10

APPENDIX B: Data entry format and explanation for the

Interagency Stream Fishery Data Input .... 25

INTPDDLICTION

The stream habitat inventory methodology described in this report resulted from four years of study on tributaries to the North and Middle Forks of the Flathead River. This study was funded by the Environmental Protection Agency through the Flathead River Basin Steering Committee. Tlie methodology draws upon multidisciplinary knowledge in describing the biological and physical features interacting to form the stream environ- ment .

The basis for this methodology was the system developed by the Resource Analysis Branch of the British Columbia Ministry of the Environm^ent and used to survey the Canadian portion of the North Fork drainage (Chamberlin 1980a, 1980b). During the four years of study, the method was refined to fit our specific needs and to reduce individual observer bias.

The U.S. Forest Service developed a Stream. Reach Inventory and Channel Stability Evaluation technique (Figure 1) to identify unstable stream channel areas and to monitor recovery rates of such areas (U.S. Forest Service 1975). The channel stability method was incorporated into our habitat evaluation technique during the 1980 field season (Fraley et al.

1981) to provide comparable data between agencies. A detailed instruction booklet describing evaluation procedures is available from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Northern Region.

A line transect methodology similar to that described by Herrington and Dunham (1967) was included in 1982 to provide more precise site specific information.

Annual reports (Graham et al. 1980, Fraley et al. 1981, Shepard et al.

1982) should be consulted to determine exact methodologies used during each field season. Our modification of the original inventory clossary is presented in ^pendix A.

METHODS

AERIAL SURVEY

The habitat evaluation process began by obtaining U.S. Geologic Survey Qjadrangle maps (7.5 minute series) of the study area and color coding all tributaries to indicate stream order. Beginning at the mouth, each tributary was divided into one km sections on maps to facilitate the location of reach boundaries, survey sites and im.portant stream features. Aerial photographs of the area were reviewed for landmark reference during aerial surveys.

Each tributary to be surveyed was flown by helicopter from its mouth to the upstream limit of suitable fish habitat. SuitaWe fish habitat was defined as pererjiial flow or adequate size to support a fish population. A definite fish barrier also marked the upstream boundary of the survey. During this upstream flight, important stream features such as slumped banks, obstructions to fish passage, beaver activity, trails and other

1

&<•"-> V u ^ u

cn J3

w pg J-

3 «9 f> O W1 ti

^ o c

u E

J o

o £ a

u X o e CO to ^ -g o

S .8

z: *^

C n) K

t0 3 ^

doc

o %C

2 c S.f

o o « W ' V c W o

r-4 O to « Q

^ "S

< rt)

o «

OJ ^ -> u O '

Ss-3 S

>* O . ^' o C ►»

o u

0 V V

u > c

S.2 £ 5

O . ut

•00 c o

i!^7 ■1

5,

l1 I ^

g K o ^ "if ^

0) I c

c: I .- S

e o

c o

•H

4-1

CO 3

I—!

CO >

4-1 CO

o c c

u

C

CO

U O

4-)

c

> c

a

CO 0)

e

CO (U

u

•u

CO

o

•H

> S-i

OJ CO

OJ

>-(

o

CO

»-l

3 GO •H

2

crossings, were noted by the observer equipped with the topographic ruaps and a ta^te recorder. Other habitat features such as stream pattern, bank slope characteristics, streambed material, debris quantity and srawning potential for cutthroat and bull trout were noted. A general overviev/ of geomorphically similar sections (reaches) was also gained during the upstream flight. General location of reach breaks v/ere based largely on changes in stream gradient. A return flight downstrear:. at greater altitude and speed allowed the observer to establish actual reach breaks and confirm locations, while keeping flying tim^e to a minimum. A mobile fuel source provided by a backup observer and a vehicle carrying 55 gallon fuel drums also reduced fuel consumption and flying time.

Tapes were transcribed in the office and stream features and reach breaks were added to the U.S.G.S. miajs. A Helicopter Stream Survey Re^xDrt (Figure 2) was compiled for each reach. Recorded information included a suggested survey section typifying the reach, information on stream features, reach characteristics and general comments. Length of the recommended survey section v/as based on total reach length. Completed helicopter survey forms and a field cop^' of the U.S.G.S. maps accompanied crews conducting ground surveys.

GROUM) SURVEY

Before beginning ground surveys, an intensive one or two day training session was conducted to teach survey persoPiTiel the technicrues and standarize eacli individual's perception of what consl.it.utes each habitat variable classification. During this training session, replicate surveys were conducted by al]. field i^iersonne] in tv^o person crews so that replication of survey results could be tested. If results froro replicate surveys differed significantly, more discuss..ion and training were used to ensure results obtained from different crews in the same reach v/ere similar. It was advisable to repeat this replicate survey with al], ground crews once during the field season to test the assumption that surveys were conducted in a similar manner.

Crews of two trained observers r^f^rformied the ground survey for each reach. The crew confirmed helicopter observations of obstructions to fish passage and other important features in each reach. The top of form FMD-I (Figure 3) was completed u^x^n arrival at the survey section. Stations where observers mteasured and rated habitat characteristics v/ere selected by facing a predetermined randomi distance along the stream, channel. These randomi paces were listed on the bottorii i_X)rtion of form FMD-I (Figure 3), Tine following parameters were evaluated at 20 randomily located sites jjer km;

(1) flow character

(2) debris presence

(3) , debris stability

(4) side channel occurrence

(5) split channe] occurrence

(6) habitat uriit (rxx ^ iiff.le, run, ^ccketwater, cascade) Aquatic habitat v/as further quantified at a variabJe number of transecrts

3

FORM: FMD-H

HELICOPTER STREAM SURVEY REPORT

Stream: Reach No, Stream kms:

Date: Time: Observer:

Suggested survey section - km to km

Reach Characteristics

Upper bank slope: Mass wasting potential:

Valley flat: Pattern:

Flow characteristics: Channel width:

Debris - channel: Barriers - types:

floodplain: locations;

Spawning potential - Bull trout:

Cutthroat:

Portion recommended for redd counts:

Bull trout - km to km

Cutthroat - km to km

General comments;

Stream features:

Figure 2. Helicopter Stream Survey report.

4

FORM FMD-I

Length of survey section

Start of survey: kn,

Stage: Dry L M Turbidity: nil L Confinement: Ent Conf Pattern: St Sin Ir Valley flat:

Fr IM

Flood High

Oc Un N/A Rm Tm

Creek NaniL .

Water Code:

Survey personnel

Aqenc)

Date:

Reach

Ti me ;

^ank: form Debris:

Side Chan

Wet width

process

X stable _ Spli t Chan

Air Temp Weather _ Photos _ Flow

Water temp. ;

Loc

m Chan width

noodplaln Debris I H L M H

Reach length _ Reach location

Stream Order

Depth: Avg

Gradient

SUBSTRATE

Size Class

Streambed

Bank

Silt -detritus

Sand (<2 mm)

Sm. Gravel (2-6. Amm)

Lg. Gravel (6. 4 -54mm)

Cobble (64-256 mtn)

Boulder-bedrock (>256 mm)

Imbeddedness: Compacti on

cm Max _

0-25 25-50 D90

cm

50-75 75-100 cm

Genotlo Xaterlal:

HABITAT UNIT

I

Pool

Riffle

Run

Pocket water

Cascade

Pool Class

I

II

111

Instream cover Overhead cover

Type: Type:

Vertical Stability - A ? D

m per pace

Pace

' No.

Transect No.

Flow Char.

DEBRIS

Side Chan.

Split Chan.

Pool (I. I I. Ill) p^^kpt yg^g,

Habitat Riffle

unit Run Cascade

Pres.

Abs.

Stable

Unstable

30

1

.271

2

428

467

MO

3

_6Qa.

632

6Z3

_Z74_

.302

858

5.

967

Figure 3. Form FMD-I for general field and office data.

5

Pace 1 No.

ransec tl No. !

Fl(jw

DEBRIS

Side Chan.

Split Chan.

Feature ^^ff]^. Pocktl w.i .er Run Cascade

Char.

Pres.

Abs. 1

Stable L

nstable

-

-

.

T—

rr

Si^ficant features^

Notes:

Figure 3. , (Continued).

6

c:er km, depending on the level of precision desired. The following parameters were measured at one meter intervals or at a minimum of five equally spaced points across each transect:

(1) depth to nearest cm

(2) instream cover

(3) overhead cover

(4) two predominant substrate size classes

Visual estimates of substrate irnbeddedness, compaction, D-90, percentages of each substrate size class, percentages of instream and bank cover and maximum depth were also made at each transect to attempt to quantify these subjective observations by using multiple observation points. Total wetted width and channel width were measured at each transect.

At every fifth transect the following features were noted:

(1) flood signs

(2) bank form

(3) bank process '

(4) bank composition

This information along with any additional comments were recorded on field form FMD-J (Figure 4).

The Forest Service stability evaluation (Figure 1) was completed impiediately following the habitat survey on each reach. VlYien possible, stream discharge was also measured at this time. The office portion of form FMD-I (Figure 3), summarizing field measurements, was completed any convenient time after the survey.

DATA ENTRY AND ANALYSIS

Habitat data for each reach were coded on Montana Interagency Stream. Fishery Resource Data Forms (Holton et al. 1981). These forms and instructions concerning their use are presented in Appendix E. Data from completed Interagency forms were keypunched and entered in the statewide data base administered through the Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks in Helena. A dictionary was constructed enabling any physical, chemical or biological parameter available to be requested for a particular reach (Fraley et al. 1981). Use of the habitat evaluation methods and their applicability to fisheries and land management situations in the Flathead National Forest were described in Graham et al. (1982) and Fraley and Graham (1982).

Habitat survey transect data were entered into data files on the ICIS 850 computer located at the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks Regional Headquarters, KaJisr^ell, Montana. Computer programs (HABFST and SUMMAR) were develoi:ed to enter and summarize habitat information by survey section.

7

(d 15

rH >

Oil >t3

a u

cn a

u o

U 6h

0)

ON

•J

tj

a

0)

O

>

Q

cn

Co

o o

0) 0)

M (d

c

(0

^ 3

-»-> a

0) aj

+■<

o •'^

cn

o I

a

o

CO

a.

a o o

o

s

o o

U r- 0)

(4

a

Eh

O

O

s

■p o <u

ID

Eh

V

03

u o

p.

*J S3 OJ

^ O 3

cn

n > c o

<H 0)

r-( >

(0 as

a >-i

cn C3

»-<

lU

T3

O

••

>

o

CO

l-i

OJ

00

a

0

CO

03

(U

CJ

o

o

0)

Xi

c

•r-l

o

CJ

3

-p =

V X

s:

rd 0)

0) x:

-a cu ■p -p

<u

r-i x: ca +-• -a

>

CO 00

o

O

CJ CT3 Q.

a

o

CJ

OJ

3

OJ Cu

Q O O

I

O

OJ 1/1 c:

03

OJ

S- 13

cn

o o

8

literatum; cited

Chaniberlin, T.W. 1980a. Aquatic system inventory (biophysical stream surveys) ADP Technical Paper 1. British Columbia, Ministry of the Environment.

Chamber lin, T.W. 1980b. Aquatic survey terminology. ADP Technical Paper 2. British Columbia, Ministry of the Environment.

Fraley, J.J., D. Read and P. Graham. 1981. Flathead River Basin fishery study. Montana Dept. Fish, Wildl. and Parks, Kalispell, MT. 193pp.

Fraley, J.J., and P.J. Graham. 1981. Physical habitat, geologic bedrock types and trout densities in tributaries of the Flathead River drainage, Montana. Proceedings of the Syirposium on the Acquisition and Utilization of Aquatic Habitat Inventory Information, Portland, Oregon.

Graham, P.J., B.B. Shepard and J.J. Fraley. 1981. Use of stream habitat classifications to identify bull trout spawning areas in streams. Pro- ceedings of the Synposium on the Acquisition and Utilization of Aquatic Habitat Inventory Information, Portland, Oregon.

Graham, P.J., D. Read, S. Leathe, J. Miller and K. Pratt. 1980. Flathead River Basin fishery study. Montana Dept. Fish, Wildl. and Parks, Kalispell, MT. 166pp.

Herrington, R.B. and D.K. Dunham. 1967. A technique for sampling general fish habitat characteristics of streams. USDA Forest Service Research Paper, IlSlT-41, Inter mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, Utah.

Holton, G.D., R.B. McFarland and B. Gooch. 1981. The Montana interagency stream fishery data storage system. Symposium for the Acquisition and Utilization of Aquatic Habitat Inventory Informtion, Portland, Oregon.

Shepard, B.B., J.J. Fraley, T.M. Weaver and P.J. Graham. 1982. Flathead River Basin fishery study. Montana Dept. Fish, Wildl. and Parks, . Kalispell, MT. 149pp.

U.S. Forest Service. 1975. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Forest Serivce Northern Region. US Government Printing Of f ice: 1978-797-059/31, Region 10. Rl-75-002. 26pp.

9

APPENDIX A

- 1

Glossary of terminology used in stream habitat surveys. Adapted from British Columbia Ministry of Environment, Resource Analysis Branch.

10

preface:

This glossary is organized with definitions preceded by the year in which they were adopted. Evaluation of some parameters changed one or more times during the four years of study, therefore several definitions may be presented for certain terms.

Many of the parameters described are classified in abundance by Nil, Low, Moderate or High. Where not specifically defined (e.g. stage) these terms should have the following meanings:

Nil the item is not present, or so seldom as to be irrelevant to

any interpretation.

Low the item is present, but only as a few scattered occurrences

or in a single spot.

Moderate the item occurs in several scattered locations or a few small concentrated zones.

High the item is frequently present throughout the sample area

(reach or point) as continuous cover or frequent zones of occurrence. |

^ - '■

GLOSSARY

bank - (1979) the rising ground bordering a stream channel below the level of rooted vegetation and above the normal streambed; designated as right or left facing downstream. (See bank form and bank process). See also Figure 1.

FI(3URE 1. Stream Cross section

11

bank cover - (1982) refers only to percent overhang <1 m above water

surface. Sample frequency - every transect.

bank form - (1979) the range of bank forms is arbitrarily separated into

four classes which reflect the current state of river processes. Sample frequency - every fifth transect (Figure 2) :

F (flat) - the river bed slopes gently to the beginning of rooted vegetation, frequently with overlapping bar deposits.

R (repose) - the bank is eroded at high water levels, but is at the angle of repose of the unconsolidated material (usually 34® - 37°).

S (steep) - the bank is nearly vertical, due to consolidation by cementation, compaction, root structure or some other agent.

U (undercut) - the bank has an undercut structure caused by erosion. When undercut banks are stabilized by vegetation this should be indicated in the comments.

FIGURE 2. Bank Forms

bank process ~ (1979) the current fluvial process the bank is undergoing. Sample frequency - every fifth transect.

12

F (failing) - active erosion and slumping is taking place.

S (stable) - the bank is of rock, has very high root density, or is otherwise protected from erosion. Artificially stabilized banks should be noted in the comments,

A (aggrading) - continuous sediment deposition is taking place, causing the river channel to migrate away from the river bank. Common on the inside of meander bends where it may be accompanied by the presence of a range of early to late serai vegetation.

barrier - See Obstruction.

cascade - (1982) a habitat unit consisting of a series of small steps or

falls.

channel - (1979) a natural or artificial waterway of perceptible extent

which periodically or continuously contains moving water. It has definite bed and banks which normally confine the water, and which display evidence of fluvial processes (See channel width and Figure 1).

channel width - (1979) the width of the channel fron rooted vegetation to

rooted vegetation. Mean annual high water level should be used in the absence of vegetation. If measured by tape, the width should be given to the nearest 0.1 m (See Figure 1). Sample frequency - every transect.

cover - (1979) anything which projects over the water surface at tlie time of survey. It is divided into two arbitrary levels; crown cover Ol m above water surface) and overhang cover (<1 m. above water surface). Described in terms of the projected area of water surface covered (% of wetted surface area). Sample frequency - visual average for reach.

(1982) sheltered areas in a wetted stream channel where a trout can rest and hide in order to avoid the impact of the elements or enemies. Inst ream cover types include aquatic vegetation, logs, debris, large cobbles and boulders, and man-made structures. Overhead cover would include undercut banks, overhanging vegetation 1 m or less above the water surface (bank cover), overhanging understory and overhanging over story canopy. Sample frequency - 1 m ir tervals or at a minimum of five equa].ly spaced cells across each transect. Cover types were expressed in terms of percent based on presence/absence data for all transects in the reach. Cover types were coded as follows:

13

Cover Codes

mstre^ Overhead

Code Code Type No. Type No.

None 0

Aquatic vegetation 1

Logs 2

Debris *C Below water 3

Boulders _y surface 4

Logs "p 5

Debris X. Above water 6

Boulders 3 surface 7

Man-made structure 8

None

Undercut bank Overhead (<1 m) Understory (1-5 m) Over story (>5 m)

0 1 2 3 4

- (1983) turbulence was added as an instream cover type. Logs, debriSr and boulders above the water surface (instream cover code numbers 5,6 & 7) were deleted from the list of instream cover types and were recorded as overhead «1 m) or understory (1-5 m) cover. Cover was recorded as being present only if it provided cover over at least 10% of the surface area of the cell being considered.

compaction - (1979) the relative looseness of bed material with respect to

fluvial processes. Caused by sedimentation, mineraliza- tion, imbrication or material size. Indicated as nil, low, moderate or high as determined by the relative ease with which a boot can be worked into streambed material. Sample frequency - every transect.

confinement - (1979) the degree to which the river channel is limited in its

lateral movement by terraces or valley walls (See Figure 3). Sample frequency - average for reach by visual and maps. The channel is either:

Ent - entrenched - the streambank is in continuous contact (coincident with) valley walls.

Conf - confined - in continuous or repeated contact at the outside of major meander bends.

Fr - frequently confined by the valley wall.

Oc - occasionally confined by the valley wall.

Un - unconfined - not touching the valley wall.

N/A - not a£-plicable (e.g. where no valley wall exists) .

14

debris (channel)

- (1979) organic material (primarily logs, limbs, root masses) deposited within the chai'inel; not just in the wetted stream channel at the time of survey. DebrJs is recorded as being present if it could provide trout cover over at least one tenth of the channel width at bankful flow.

(1982) described as present or absent at 20 sites per km.

debris (floodplain) - (1980) organic material (prima lily logs, limbs.- root

masses) deposited within the floodplain at time of survey. Described as Nil, Low, Moderate or High. (See flood sign). Sample frequency - average for reach taken from helicopter sheets.

debris stability - (1979) debris in the stream channel that has a low

probability of being moved out of the area during normal spring runoff. Stable debris is usually embedded in or attached to the streambed or bank and forms a part of the stream's morphologic character .

(1982) Sanple frequency - 20 sites per km.

D-90 - (1979) the diameter of bed material which is larger than 90% of the remaining material. Measured by length of intermediate axis. See Figure 4. Sample frequency - every tiansect.

D90=40 nira (b axis;

%

less than

100-

50 -

20 30 40 50

substrate diameter (mm)

Interi!, Mate diameter = b

FIGURE 4. D-90 and Intermediate Axis

15

Un-confined Not applicable

FIGURE 3: Confincnicnt 16

eirbeddedness (imbeddedness.) - (1979) the degree of filling of the

interstitial spaces of a gravel or rubble stream bottori! with sand or fines. Estimated as 0 to 25%, 25 to 50% , 50 to 75%, or 75 to 100% ernbedded. Sample frequency - every transect.

- (1983) the extent to which the predominant-cized particles in the streambed are covered by fine materials (sand & silt). Embeddedness was coded as follows:

Enbeddedness Code No.

Dominant particle size group completely 1

entoedded in fines (or nearly so) .

Three-fourths ei±)edded 2

One-half embedded 3

One-fourth embedded r 4

Unembedded 5

entrenchment

- (1979) stream channel incision resulting from current fluvial processes. This represents the extreme case of stream confinement. (See confinement).

feature - (1979)

a specific stream, attribute worthy of note. Important stream features would include slumped banks, and barriers or obstructions (such as beaver dams, log jams, chutes, falls) that could possibly hinder upstream fish niovement. The location, length and height of important features should be recorded. . v. . ,r

flood signs -

(1979) evidence of the height of historic flood water levels. Recorded are the "height" above water level at the time of survey and the "type" of evidence such as debris (D), flood channels or bank scour (E), soil profiles (P), mud deposited on trees (M), or historical information (H) such as might be found in newspaper files. Sample frequency - every fifth transect.

flow - (1979)

discharge in cfs or cms. Method of measurement and meter type must be indicated. Sample frequency - flow during survey or average low flow.

flow character - (1979) the surface expression of the water that is determined by water velocity and bed material. Sample frequency - 20 sites per km. It is described at the time of survey as:

p - placid - tranquil, sluggish s - swirling - eddies, boils, swirls r " rolling - unbroken wave forms numerous b - broken -~ standing waves are broken, rapids, numerous hydraulic juips

t - tumbling - cascades, usually over large boulders or rock outcrops.

17

genetic material - (1979) materials are classified according to their mode .) of formation. Specific processes of erosion,

transport ion, deposition, mass wasting and weathering produce specific types of materials that are characterized chiefly by texture and surface expression. Subsurface layers are noted in a comment. Sample frequency - visual average for reach.

Descriptive terminology:

A Anthropogenic - man-made or man-modified materials; including those associated with mineral exploitation and waste disposal, and excluding archaelogical sites.

C Colluvial- product of mass wastage? materials that have reached their present position by direct, gravity- induced movement (i.e. no agent of transportation involved). Usually angular and poorly sorted.

E Eolian - materials transported and deposited by wind action. Usually silt or fine sand with thin cross-bedding.

F Fluvial - materials transported and deposited by streams and rivers. Usually rounded, sorted into horizontal layers, and poorly compacted.

I Ice - glacier ice.

L Lacustrine - sediments that have settled from suspension of bodies of standing fresh water or that have accumulated at their margins through wave action. May be fine textured with repetitive annual layers (varves).

M Morainal - the material transported beneath, beside, or within and in front of a glacier; deposited directly from the glacier and not modified by any intermediate agent. Usually poorly sorted and angular to sub-angular. May be highly compacted and have significant clay content .

0 Organic - materials resulting from vegetative growth, decay and accumulation in and around closed basins or on gentle slopes where the rate of accumulation exceeds that of decay.

R Bedrock - rock outcrop and rock covered by a thin mantle (less than 10 cm) of consolidated materials.

S Saprolite - weathered bedrock, decomposed in situ principally by processes of chemical weathering.

V Volcanic - unconsolidated pyroclastic sediments that occur extensively at the land surface.

18

W Marine - sediments that have settled froni suspension in salt or brackish water bodies or that have accumulated at their margins through shoreline processes such as wave action and longshore drift. Found in coastal areas below 125 m above sea level.

U Undifferentiated - layered sequence of more than three typez- of genetic material outcrossing on a steep, erosional (scarp) slope.

gradient - (1979) Difference in elevation (m) from upper to lower reach

breaks divided by length of reach (m) X 100. Calculated from a topographic map. Sample frequency - for entire reach.

habitat unit - (1979a) expression of streams hydrologic nature. Sample frequency - 20 sites per km. Broken into:

pool -^^".i

riffle run

glide '

pool riffle

run - - ;

riffle '• run

pocketwater

pool riffle run

pocketwater c :

cascade

instream cover - (1982) See cover. i

notes - (1979) comments should be made in regards to habitat suitability for spawning westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout; land use activities (logging, grazing, etc.) in the valley flat and proximity to streambanks; uniformity of habitat within reach; etc.

obstruction - (1979) any object or formation that may block or hinder

waterflow and/or fish migration identified by helicopter and confirmed by ground crew. Various types are distinguished . such as falls, cascade/chutes, beaver dams, culverts, velocity and man-made dams. Height, length and location should be recorded.

(1979b)

(1980)

(1982)

19

(1982) obstructions or barriers are classified as:

Type A

Type C Type D

Complete barrier to all fish paf:r.age Rirrior to :;[VJwniiKj hull I tout Possible barrier to all fish passage Possible barrier to spawning bull trout.

pattern - (1979) the channel pattern of a reach described in terms of its relative meander curvature (See Figure 5). Sample frequency - average for reach by visual and maps. Classified as follows:

St straight - very little curvature within the reach. Sin sinuous - slight curvature within a belt of less than

approximately two channel widths. Ir irregular - no repeatable pattern.

Im irregular meander - a repeated pattern is vaguely present in the channel plan. The angle between the channel and the general valley trend is less than 90°.

Rm regular meanders - characterized by a clearly repeated pattern.

Tm tortuous meanders - a more or less repeated pattern characterized by angles greater than 90°.

Straight Sinuous

Irregular

Irregular meander

Regular meander

Tortuous meander

FIGURE 5.

Channel Patterns

20

pocket water - (1980) a habitat unit - typically a run, whose flow is

interrupted by boulders creating small turbulent pools or "pockets" v/hich can provide cover for fish„ Distinguished from cascade by the absence of small steps or falls.

pool ~ (1979) a habitat unit of low velocity and deep water relative to the main current.

pool classification - (1979) a classification scheme designed to indicate

the value of a pool as fish habitat. Each pool is rated based on the size, depth, and cover. The total score is used to deter m.ine pool class. The scoring is as follows:

DEPTH RATING COWR RATIISG

Depth Score Cover Score

Over 3 feet 3 Abundant 3

2-3 feet 2 Partial 2

Less than 2 feet 1 Exposed 1

SIZE RATING (measureirent longest axis of pool)

gcor?

Pool longer or wider than average width of stream 3 Pool as long or wide as average width of stream 2 Pool much shorter or narrower than average width 1 of stream

TOTAL SCORE POOL CLASS

8 or 9 I ^ 7 II 5* or 6 III**

*A total score of 5 must include 2 points for depth and two points for cover.

**Pools that score less than Class III are recorded as "unclassified" or as "pocket water".

reach - (1979) a segment of a stream which has a distinct association of physical habitat characteristics. Gradient is an important factor in reach delineation. Streams are divided into reaches by aerial observer.

reach length - (1979) distance in km from lower to upper reach break. Measured on toi:x)oraphic map.

21

reach number - (1979) reaches are numbered sequentially upstream from the mouth (1,2, ...n).

riffle - (1979) a habitat unit with shallow, fast moving water where the surface is turbulent and broken.

run - (1979) a habitat unit of medium velocity water with surface not turbulent to the extent of being broken. Intermediate between pool and riffle.

scour - (1979) substrate size, angularity and brightness indicate amount of scour or deposition along channel bottom. Described as Nil, Low, Moderate or High. Sample frequency - visual average for reach.

serial number - (1981) this number will be controlled by regional or state office or agency entering information.

side channel - (1979) a chaiinel connected to the main cheinnel that is

usually less than one fourth of the average main channel width. Side channels typically have lower velocity flows (frequently placid) and smaller substrate (small gravel, fines, and detritus) than does the main channel. Described as present or absent at 20 sites per km.

split channel - (1982) channel divisions that do not differ significantly from the main channel in terms of current velocity or substrate type. Described as present or absent at 20 sites per km.

stage - (1979) the relative water level at the time of survey

inferred from evidence of flow in bank and bed. Sample frequency - visual average for reach. The categories usedare dry, low, moderate, high and flood:

Dry - water not present or only as unconnected pools.

Low -- water flowing as thread(s) within the channel; most bed

material exposed. Moderate - water flowing throughout the normal bed and in contact with lower portions of banks. Some bars are exposed; sand and small gravel sized bed material is in motion. High - water flowing throughout the normal bed and in contact with middle to upper portions of banks; most bars are submerged; gravel and cdDble. Sized bed material is in motion. Flood - water bank full or over banks and into floodplain; maximum rates of bed material transport.

stability rating - (1980) nine ratings of bank stability combined with

six ratings of bed stability for a stream reach. U.S. Forest Service stability evaluation field forms were used. Sample frequency - average for reach.

22

stream order - (1979) a number assigned to a stream based on its "

location in the drainage. Any unforked channel which appears on USGS maps is a first order drainage. Two first order streams meet to form a second order stream, and so on.

substrate composition - (1979) the assemblage of sizes of material in

banks and bed. Sample frequency - every transect. Described according to the following:

- (1982) the dominant and subdominant substrate types were recorded for each cell at 1 m intervals (or at a minimum of five equally spaced cells) across each transect. The percent composition of each substrate size class within the stream reach was calculated as the number of occurrences of a particular size class as either a dominant or subdominant type, divided by two times the number of measurement cells. ;

turbidity - (1979) described as Nil, Low, Moderate or High. Sample frequency - visual average for reach.

valley: channel ratio - (1979) wean valley width

mean channel width Sample frequency - average for reach.

valley flat - (1979) the area of a valley bottom which may flood,

including low terraces. Relic terraces which cannot be flooded by the present river are excluded from the valley flat. See Figure 6. Estimated mean width by aerial observer or from USGS maps.

valley wall - (1979) the remainder of the valley slope above the valley

flat and relic terraces. In some cases such as on fans or deltas, there may be no valley wall. See Figure 6.

vertical stability - (1979) an indication of the net effect over

a long time period of processes of deposition or scour of tlie streambed. Described as degrading (Deg), aggrading (Agr) or not obvious (?). Sample frequency - visual average for reach.

water chemistry - (1981) chemical parameters and ratings, optional.

water code - State of Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks code number for stream in question.

Code

1

2

3,4 5 6

23

wetted width - the width of water surface at the point sample

cross-section. Sample frequency - every transect.

APPENDIX B

Data entry formt and explanation for the Interagency Stream Fishery Data Input Form (for cards 1-38 Format, instructions and example forms for

additional cards 30 through 38) . ^

25

IlTTFlPAGE'NCy STREAM FISFEI'Y DATA INPTO FOm TNSTPUCTIONS FOR DATA EliTRY CARDS 1-22

CARD 1 :

Serial Number i This number will bo controlled by reoiona] or state office or agency entering information.

State: Ttie code for Montar.a is 30.

Hydrologic Unit Code: This entry designates the drainage. Rixjional snd state office of each agency have these codes c

Stream Order: A numerical class identification assigned to a tiibutary based on its location in the drainage. Two first order strear.is meet to form a second order streain, etc.

State Water Code and Water Type: State water code and watei tyi-^ c.re obtained from a list furnished by the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlifo and Parks. Stream water type codes are 01 to 19, with 19 being a stream un£ible to sustain a population of fish.

Reach: Portion of a stream with a distinct association of physical habitat characteristics. Gradient is the major fcictor in reach delineation.

Reach Number: Tlie reaches are numbered consecutively front the mouthf up the streaiTi.

CARD 2 AND 3:

Reach Boundaries; Brief description of upper and lower boundaries and map coordinates for these boundaries.

Elevation: Upper and lower elevation of reach boundaries in meters.

Average Wetted Width; Average of measurements from one water's edge to the other, taken at random intervals within the habitat section.

Tributary To;: USCS map name of stream or river into which the study stream converges.

County : All Flathead County streams are 029. CARD 5:

Fish and Game Region: A13 Flathead County streaitis are ir Region One.

Percent Pocket Water. A series of small pools that do not cjassify at pools individually, but in corbi nation create fish kibitat. Pocket v;aters are usually found in bouldc: cascade area^.

Ingress; Legal avai.labi].ity of piJDlic accero:. tc th<:- r.ti.c-.iri.

26

CARD 8: -

Flow During Survey. The instream flow (in /sec) during the survey and Lhe date of obcervation.

Mo r Ilia 1 Low Flow- Lov^est flcv/ expected during an average year fiOD i>^iEt records or as can be estimated. Kotes This is not thr- histc)i i.c lav flow.

Valley Flat: The area of a valley bottom which raay flood, including low terraces. Relic terraces which cannot be flooded by the present rivei are excluded from the valley flat.

Channel Width: The width of the channel from rooted vegetation to rooted vegetation.

Average Maximum Pool Depth: Tine maximum depth measured in the deepest £:>ool in the habitat section.

Gradient (%) : Difference in elevation (neters) from uptxi to lower end

of reach

Length of reach (meters)

This is usually measured with a clinometer or is calculated from a topographic: map.

Pool -Run-Ri f fie Ratio: Tlie estimated percent of each type^ for a iX)rtion of the stream at low water. In cent) iret ion Vv'ith pocket water, ecjuals 100%.

Pool - Usually deeper, quiet water, although £x3ols raay bc^ at the base of falls.

Run - Moderately mtOving water with the surface not turbulent to the extent of being broken. Intermediate between pool and riffle.

Riffle - Shallow, fast moving water where the surface is turbulent and broken.

CARD 9 AND 10:

Bottom Type: Entered under Run. Percent make-up of bot.tort) substrate (the bed material) .

Average Peak Water Temperature: Tlrie highest water tem^x-rature nteasured duiing the summer.

Spring Creek: A spring creek or spring stream is identified by its faiij^ constant temperature.- flow arid clear v/ater. Watercress v/i.!] often be present.

Affected by Lake: When lake or ii!|oundm.ent significant] v affects water temperature, flow pattern, fish food, or fish runs within the reach or

27

stream,

Inuridated by Beaver Ponds; Tl'ie percent of t±e reach ]encth pret>er:tly impounded by beaver {^jonds is entered.

D-90: The dian.eter of bed material which is laroei thai'i 90 percent of iilie renaining material. I-'easured by length of intermediate axis.

Total Alkalinity and Specific Conductance » Alkalinity and conductivity values are measured at the lower end of individual drainages during the low flow period.

Floating ; Recreational use by boaters.

Special Value; Importance as a trout recruitment streaiP.

CAPX) 11:

Channel Stability Rating Elements: Nine ratings of bank stability ccmbilr'ed with six ratings of bed material for a stream reach. U.S. Forest Servico stability evaluation field forms were used.

Pool Classes: The percentage of the pools in the reach in each pool class. Total = 100 percent. Pool classes are determined as follows:;

Size: Measurements refer to the longest axis of the intersected pool .

3 - pool larger or wider than average width of stream

2 - i-ool as wide or long as average strciam width

1 - pool much shorter and narrower thixn average stream, widtli.

Depth Ratings Cover Ratings

3 - Over 3 feet 3 - Abundarit cover

2 - 2-3 feet 2 - Partial ccver

1 - Under 2 feet 1 - Ex].X)L>ed

Total Ratings Pool Class

8-9 1

7 2

5-6* 3

4-5 4

3 5 '

*Sum of 5 must include 2 for depth and 2 for cover.

Habitat Value for Fishes of Special Concern: A judgement value of habitat for spavining and production of v/estt^.Tope cutthroat.

Fish Population: List of game . '"r.h species present, their abundance and dominant use.

28

CAI^ 19;

Inibeddedness:: The filling of the inteistitial spaces of a oravel or i ijt::)bl e stream bottom with sand or fines.

Habitat Trend: All rnan-caused activities in or adjacent to tlie streain .t; well as dynamic natural processes.

Esthetic: Description of the pristine qualities of tlic reach. CARD 20:

Channel Alterations: Cause, type, and length of artificial and natural changes occurring in the stream channel.

Bank Encroachment: Description of structure or activities that interfere with natural stream or floodplain hydraulics.

CARD 21:

Data Source: Month, year, field person, and agency to be contacted concerning data and agency.

CARD 22t

Information on the reach not contained on other cards. ADDITTOMAI, INFORT-IATION:

Parameters v/ere rated based on the following criteria: 1-3 Dit-cins the data rated were based on judgement estiriates. 4-6 mfijans the data rated were based on limited nieasurenc- iii-.F. 7-9 means the data rated were based on exter;sive ir^f^asureriients.

29

Columns 28-30 Columns 31-46 Columns 47-49

INTERAGENCY STE^l FISHERY DATA IMPLTT FORK INSTRUCTIONS FOR DATA ENTRY CARDS 30-38

Cards 30-35 are optional, but any module that has entries must be comt-lctC; i.e., Sfx^cies (codes) and densities must be filled out.

CARD 30 - POOLS

ColuiTiii 6-7: Method of estimatino (see code sheets on page B8 for method abbreviations)

Column 8: Rating, enter 1-9

Column 9-11: Enter species code (enter 3 digit nunber) (012) Columns 12-27: Enter density (0-999.9) per 100 m^ for each age class Enter species code (005)

Enter densities (0-999.9) per 100 m^ for each age class Species code (085) Columns 50-57: Densities (0-999.9) i^er 300 m^

If a s^^cies is not present, leave £]r-x?ciefs code and density columns b]ank.

CARD 11 - 34 - RUI^JS, RIFFLES, VOCKET WATER, OO^EINED FEATURES

Sarre as Card 30

CARD 35 . -

Same as Card 30 except enter Biomass (g/lCO m^) (0-999.9) instead of density.

CARD 36

Option, but any module that has entries must be con»plete, i.e., number, density, year and rating must be filled out.

Coluifiis 6-8: Nuiit)er of bull trout redds in reach, enter 0-999

CoJuniiis 9-11: Density of redds (no/km) (0-99.9)

ColuiTd-is 12-13: Year of redd survey (1950 to 1980)

Columns 14: Rating 1-9

Sequence repeated thrcugh coJuiin 4] .

CARD 31 - ADDITIOr^AL PHYSICAL TTAT DATA

30

Coluraiis 6-8; Avc-r.age depth (0-999 cm)

Colunr; S: Rating (1-9) ' -^^r-'-^'^^r^/'- /

ColuFii-is 10-1] : Percent cover, overhang (0-99 or blarilO 'h\ : ^ ^ , Colupais 12-13: Percent canopy (0-99 or blank) ^ '

Coluirn 14: Rating (1-9) ' v'

Columns 15-17: Wetted cross sectional area (m^) .1-99.9

ColuiiTj 18: Rating (1-9)

Columns 17-25: Drainage area (1-999999.9 or blank) '

Cc)jum-\ 26: Rating (1-9) l'< ' '

Columri 27: Barrier Type (see code sheet for abbreviations)

Columns 28-31: Barriers (0-999.9 or blank) 1.1 r

Column 32: Rating (1-9)

Columns 33-42: Percent cover in features (0-99, or blank) :C < ' «

Column 43: Rating (1-9)

Columns 44-46: Blank -■^■/^ -.ii

Columns 47-48: Flow characteristics (see code sheel. for abbreviations, Alpha code - dominant in Col. 48)

Co].umn 49: Blank

Columns 50-51: Valley - channel ratio (1-99) Column 52: Rating (1-9)

Column 53: Confinement (see code abbreviations) Colunn 54; Pattern (see code al:)breviations) Columi-^ 55: Floodplain debris - M L M H Column 56: Channe] debris - U L M H Columaxs 57-59: Percent of stable debris (0-100) Coliirm 60: Rating (1-9)

Column 6] : Bank Form (see code abbreviations)

31

Co]unTi 62 r Eank Process (see cede abbreviations)

Colunin 63: Type of Genetic Material (see code abbreviations)

Colurori 64: Rating (1-9)

CARD 18 - OPTIONAL

Chemical paraneters and ratings, optional, all can be blank

Lines 6-9: Total Carbon (.01-9.99) Rating 1-9

Lines 10-13: Total Phosphorous (.001-.999) Rating 1-9

Lines 14-17: N03 - (.01-9.99) Rating 1-9

Lines 18-21: SC4 - 2 (.1-99.9) Rating 1-9 . .

Lines 22-25: Na+ (.1-99.9) Rating 1-9

Lines 26-29: K''' (.01-9.99) Rating 1-9

Lines 30-33: Ca.^'^ (.1-99.9) Rating 1-9

Lines 34-37: Mg'*'^ (.1-99.9) Rating 1-9

Line 38: Turbidity - N L M H, (Nil, I<)w, Moderate, High)

32

CX)DE AF.nREVIAI'TONS

METFICD OF OBTATNmC FISH APJTNDANCE T^FORMATIOM

A t.v^'o letter cede was used to identify the n^ethod for obtain ino fish information. The first letter identifies the Method us.ed to collect the information and the second letter identifies the Estinator iir;ed.

METHOD EST H'l ATOP

1st

2nd

Ijetter

Electrof ishing

Letter

B:

Boat electrof ishing with boom

T:

T^s/0-£^.S5

M:

Boat electrof ishing with mobile

P:

Petei soi ; \ \ci \ k-reca[ tn rc

anode

Z:

7ippin

Si

Bank electrofishing

. Si

Schinable iiiar k- it m .c^ i li l

P:

Backpack electrofishing

C:

Catch per unit ef f oi 1

N:

Total catc:h

Observation

Unknown

Bensitv

J.

U:

Underwater observation (snorkel)

I:

Above water observation

Mets

W:

Weirs

J:

Trammel net

L:

Trap-type net without leads

N:

Trap-type net with leads

0:

Purse seine

Q:

Beach seine

T:

Traw].

V:

Vertical gill net

F:

Floating gill net

G:

Sinking gill net

Ds

Drift net

Other

K:

Creel

F:

Hydroacoustic

C:

Cheniic^ 1

E:

Exj)]osives

R:

Dewatering

7.:

Hand capture

A:

Angling

33

FlCM rnRKArr'RRTSTICS

P S R B

T:

BAEESE TYPES

A: B: C: D:

Placid - Tranquil, Slugcj.sh

Swirling - Eddies, Boils, Swirls

Rollinq - Unbroken wave forrns nunerous

Broken - Standing waves are broken, ranids, mnr^rous

-^Scades, usually over large bcOders or rock outcrops

Complete barrier to all fish passage Barrier to spawning bulls Possible barrier to al]. fish passage Possible barrier to spawning bulls

nr)^FTNEyIE^lT -

confinement (R) - the degree to which ^^^^'J^'^^^ Is'ei^er^ lateral movement by terraces or valley walls. Tl,e channel is eitJr.er.

Entrenched - The streambank is in continuous contact (coincident with) valley walls.

Confined - In continuous or repeated contact at the outside of major meander bends.

Frequently confirmed by the val]ey wall .

Occasionally confined by the valley wall.

Unconfined - not touching the valley wall.

Not applicable (e.g. where no valley wal] exists).

Confinement n f ication

Confined

E:

C:

F: X: U:

Ent

Conf

Fr Oc Un N/A

Entrenched

PATTERN

Pattern (R) - The channel pattern for the reach is described in teim.^, of curvature. The channel is either:

S: N:

St

Sin

Straight - Very little curvaturC' witiiiri the reach.

Sinuour -■ r;, ^ght curvature within a belt of less than approxiriBte.1 : two channel widths.

34

P: C:

R: T:

Tr Irregular - No repeatable patt:ern. S^i'S? ^ ^

Im Irregular Meander - A retreated [jattern is vaguely

pr(vcer.i: h> the channel plan, Tlie anijlt bct.v/ect; tli<' channel and the general valley trend is lesr. than 90^.

Rm Regular Meanders - Characterized by <^ clearly lep^ated

]:jattern ,

Tm Tortuous Meanders - A more or less rev^eated pattern

characterized by angles greater than 90^.

Typical Meander Patterns

Straight Irregular Meander

Sinuous

lURBIDITY

Irregular

High Low

Moderate Nil

Regular Meander

Tlie current fluvial process the bank is undergoing.

F; Failing - Active erosion and slumping is taking place.

S: Stable - The bank is composed of rock and has r? very

high root density, or is otherwise piotected from erosion. Artificially stabilized bank,^: ;Ox)Uld be noted in the coiTffTients.

A:

Aggrading - Continuous sediment derosition is iakiruj place^ causing the river channel to ruicrate away fiom the river bank. Common on the inside of meander bends v/here it may be accompanied by the presence of a ranee of early to late serai veoetaiion.

35

RANK FORT'I

Tie range of bank foriiis iz- arbitrarily separated into four c.lar.?<-r v/l':Ioh reflect the current state of river processes. These are:

F: Flat - The riverbed slofc-s gently to "che begini.iiic of

rooted vegetation, frequently with ovei lapping bar deposits,

R: Repose - The barik is eroded at high water levels, but is

at the angle of repose of the unconsolidated raaterial (usually 34<^ - 37°) .

S: Steep - The bank is nearly vertical, due to

consolidation by cernentetion, conip^icticn, root structure, or soire other agent.

U: Undercut - The bank has an undercut structure caused by

erosion. VJhen undercut banks are stiabJlized by vegetation this should be indicated in the conrrentb.

GENETIC MATERIALS (P)

Materials are classified according to their mode of formation. Sj-ecific: processes of erosion, transportation, deposition, mass wasting and weathering produce sp^ecific types of materials that are characterized chiefly by texture and surface expression. For addet'' dei ojl, consult t.) c- Terrain Classif icatiori Manual (ELUC - Sec. 1976), Siibsui f^ce- layers are noted in a comment. Descriptive teniiino]og^-:

A; Anthropogenic - Man-made or man-modified mater iaLs;

including those associated with mineral exploitatjor> cino waste disposal, and excluding archaecJogical sites.

C: Colluvial - Product of mass wastage; rrinerals that have

reached their present position by direct, gravity- induced movement (i.e. no agent of transportation involved). Usual] y angular and poorly soi.ted.

E; Eolian - Materials transported and dei;xjsitGd b^ V'ind

action, Usucdly silt or fine sand v/ith thin cross- bedding,

F- F.Uivial - Mal-.erials trar^s^orted and de^-osited by sti.€.airi:-.

and rivers. Usually rounded, sorted liito horizontal layers, and poor.ly contacted,

K: Ice - Glacier ice.

L: I.ar;ustrine - Sediipents that have settled frorr siispensioti

in bodies c;f standing fresh water or that have - , accumulated their margins through wave action. May

be fine textured with repjetitive annua] layers (varves) .

36

yUNV Z'ff'T i^NIUniDM Sb31131 "IVildVS ^3lH\hr. 3'n - N3g INlOd 1"13J UO 1]3N3d IdOS 3Sr; - a"1B]D31 3il£iM

37

38

3 C

C

o o

(U

i-

39

o o

40

i

1

f

f

1;

1']

1

ll

;j

r

■J >

It J

;

1

O

m

CO iX>

va

s

r>

lO

O «

M

tn

■0

1

! _ 1

1 -

1 1

1 _

57

n

IN O

m

<j?

CD

kC

J* ,

ut 1 ^ 1 ^ 1

r-» fl

iO R o

X) SI

/I

I

i/>

rs

O p^

01

<A

m

lO lO

<o u>

in 10

10

<s

a to

at in

o '

in

I'

<

C I

(

ce 1 r-» j n*

O

i£. Cb

lO

IC

«

10

1^

O

o

D

n n

D

;

n

IN;

O

us

u>

lu>

iis*

" -

o ~ ,

i

fs*

■*

O

r>

KL

«l>

u; p -

NS

\r

m o

r-i

l£> ISl

•0

le o

<0

T

n| no! in|

ml

a

mi oj

Cl|

•tf 1 ao!

^1 p^B

'1

IS «

(St , _

r> ?

"1

J

i;

■»

4 ■» «

1

I < 1 1

j ^ cr

•r—

4J C

o o

cu

S- Ll_

1

1 - I -

unuogi <j

n

^ r

n uimosi < ;

n n

1

t

D

Tt

n

» niuiOgi<

n

-i"

u u

u

. b

M

n n

n

:

to ' 'I \n 1 J

m j

J iuiuQg]<- 1

i uiuiogi>

J

n

>n

IN

u>

lA

o. uimogi>

r

1 _ I r

-I

■)

r>

I unuogp

t

^ t 1

I

-

< i

T A

n n

= imnogi;>

r

_ u r

_ u

ij

"> n ^1

n

n

?j niuiggx >

n in ly in

o mulogix

3 poo

in

I 9po3

9

a

[ sajoads

r

c

_ ^

> a poo . sayoads

< r

t|

I SPOD

' sefoads » ^

» apoo X sajDads

1

O 9

J .III

u

_ \ </

%

■<

^

r

^3

> r

1

r

1

>

! ."I

«

1

r

f S .III

r

-

lO JQ

5 " ^.III

-

1 II

t %

<

Hi

^

t

? II

IS

*~ C

II

' r

■<!

? II

? a3v

r- •%

K

C

M

^ r

' - V

^ S II

' 2 33v

mm

' u

' s

S'" II ? 83V

•1 a3v

i, }!

' u f

?

i

' 33v

a

IT

n

1 I 33v

«■

p

~}S

r

5 ^

! Q) T » 4J 1

' r? 33¥- iS .

1^

> § . o

)

) "

0) T

1 ^ ^

-■

fl-^ ~

-> 0)

i?

^ .2

i _;

Q 0)

1 8 0

<

r

r r

r

[

!,§ 0

n m n

! u)

( 1

0

5 93v

<•

1"

33v

S

f PI

~ " p<

n

1

i «

1 (r. 1

J::^ 0

p 33v

"

(

r

^ m ^> J=

r f

I;

r

«

!

; 9poD sayDadg

en

<N

CO

a poo say aads

Q n ~~ i\

"""00

j

apoo soyoads

J3

Iw pi

IN

*

apoo sayoads

4

; S apoo

I gsayoads

J

C

III

III

1 -^a3v

m

~ IT

III

<\

lO

in

«

^aSV

r<

Ifl

M

•C

r<

1

III

; +a8v

~ t

4 ^ '

) M « >^

i .III

+a8v

t

t

«

p

I o J °

6 11

R IN

«s «>

1

I 11 a2v

R

_5 s

aav

PI n

-a

fsi

•»

O IM

11 a3v

' ' n ri

(N M

IM

- O

IN

1

J "

a3v

r-

p.

p< PI

t\

3

IN

II aSv

^

rs

ni

01 CO

r-

o

I

00

I a3v

<r>

"~ (0

~ «o

a3v

o<

-- m

- ,^

10

I

a3v

PS.

I aSy

« p% •»

° i 1

s: 0 !

0

fS)

C

in <

~

0

a3v

(O

~~ ' (TM

0

a3v

in

~ rt

0

aSy

in * « ■" PI

a poo sajDads

O

<n

1 " apoq o

sa-fDadcj ^

a poo ' safoadg

O

ch

apoo j sayoads j

~ - O

apoo sajDadsi

1

- o

i!

00

'<<UX3B^ I"

3uj3t?H

fT>

m

1

■i:

poqqawj

1 i

rv.

poipai^ _ 1 1— ^

f .

poipaK 1

:-7; i

pqmaKj

' .'O 1

Ps

<•

^1

1

^ 1 ;

J <i. CL T,

41

,4 r

s

li

I-

1

j PP3H

' '}o joqmnfi

if 'jQTica t

}

■(i (1>C4/"0N) ;-] Xjfsuaaj

sppaa

(l€</*oN) I

.•]jo Joqmn|«j

o

cn

42

APPEDSDIX B

Lengths of hydroaccxistic sample transects, cross-sectional area of each depth strata covered by the 10° cone width, and volume of water sampled by depth strata for hydroacoustic transects sampled in Libby Reservoir during August, 1984.

43

/^pendix Bl. Lengths and volumes across 38 hydroacoustic transects in Libby Reservoir sairpled during August 1984.

Mea. Length^ Total Volume (Area x length) by depth interval (m^ x lOQ)

Transect (m) 0-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 50-60 60-70

Tenmile

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10

Peck Gulch 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38

areaCM-^)

2024

1982

1966

2016

2212

2358

2200

2205

2913

1846

1495 1768 1457 1724 2180 1888 1489

754 1161

554

1850 728 2207 1518 3056 1943 1947 1619 3315 3441

1023 1159 2541 3439 909 3661 3203 2094

8.75 177.1 173.4 172.0 176.4 193.5 206.3 192.5 192.9 254.9 161.5

130.8 154.7 127.5 150.8 190.7 165.2 130.3

66.0 101.6

48.5

161.9 63.7 193.1 132.8 267.4 170.0 170.4 141.7 290.1 301,1

89.5 101.4 222.3 300.9

79.5 320.3 280.3 183.2

26.25 531.3 520.3 516.1 529.2 580.6 619.0 577.5 578.8 764.7 484.6

392.4 464.1 382.5 452.5 572.2 495.6 390.9 197.9 304.8 145.4

485.6 191.1 579.3 398.5 802.2 510.0 511.1 425.0

870, 903,

268.5 304.2 667.0 902.7 238.6 961.0 840.8 549.7

43.75 885.5 867.1 860.1 882.0 967.7

1031.6 962.5 964.7

1274.4 807.6

654 773 637 754 953 826 651 329 507 242

809.4 318.5 965.6 664.1 1337.0 850.1 851.8 708.3 1450.3 1505.4

447.6

507.1 1111.7 1504.6

397.7 1601.7 1401.3

916.1

61.25 1239.7 1214.0 1214.2 1234.8 1354.8 1444.3 1347.5 1350.6 1784.2 1130.7

915.7 1082.9 892.4 1055.9 1335.2 1156.4 912.0 461.8 711.1 339.3

1133.1 445.9 1351.8 929.8 1871.8 1190.1 1192.5 991.6 2030.4 2107.6

626.6 709.9 1556.4 2106.4 556.8 2242.4 1961.8 1282.6

78.75 1593.9 1560.8 1548.2 1587.6 1741.9 1856.9 1732.5 1736.4 2294,0 1453.7

1177.3 1392.3 1147.4 1357,6 1716,7 1486.8 1172.6 593.8 914.3 436.3

1456.9

573,3 1738.0 1195.4 2406.6 1530,1 1533,3 1275.0 2610.6 2709.8

96,25 1948,1 1907,7 1892.3 1940.4 2129.0 2269.6 2117.5 2122.3 2803.8 1776.8

1438.9 1701.7 1402,4 1659.3 2098.2 1817.2 1433.2

725.7 1117.5

533.2

1780.6 700.7 2124.2 1461.1 2941.4 1870.1 1874,0 1558,3 3190,7 3311,9

113,75 2302,3 2254.5 2236.3 2293.2 2516.1 2682.2 2502.5 2508.2 3313,5 2099,8

1700,6 2011,1 1657,3 1961,0 2479,7 2147,6 1693,7

857,7 1320,6

630,2

2104.4 828.1 2510.5 1726.7 3476.2 2210.2 2214.7 1841.6 3770.8 3914.1

TOTAL 76.1 km

■1/ Based on boat speed & time corrected using known distance transects.

44

APPENDIX C

Temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, and conductivity profiles in Libby Reservoir during 1983 and 1984.

JULY 20/29. 1983

INTERNATIONAL BOUNOARY

BAILEY BfllOGE

igure CI .

Temperature isopleths in Libby Reservoir in July, August, and October-November, 1984.

45

Figure C2. Temperatures measured at the surface, 15 m, and 30 m depths of three areas of Libby Reservoir during 1983 and 1984 .

46

ID CD

u: 1/1 "J

C J UJ

■-•s: ex

0)

CD O)

■rl

o > u

Q) lli W

m a

Q fd

QJ M

rH

(U

0

CO -vT

fd 00

0) cTi

fd

O ro

00 CO (Ti

0) tP -I c

o u

U

CP ■H

:i33J) iN3W3ynSb3W 30 N01IdA333

47

u_ t J

Li'

LL t-J

a" if

cr

U

t J

o

3" CD

en

CD

o

fd

(1)

fd

Q)

i-H

■H

(— ;

(U

r 1 CH

Q)

XI

4-)

C

-H

0)

5^

13

00

W

fO

dJ

c

c

rd

CU

U> ro

>iCX>

X

0

(U

C

>

•rH

5-1

O

D

CO

T!

w

•H

>^

•H

O

tt-l

>

0

(D

U)

cn

x:

0)

Pi

(D

1— 1

>i

0

U3

■H

H

1-:]

ur.i

CJ

u>

U)

r J

U)

aj

■TT

r-

3*

n

(\J

fu

r\j

f o

r\j

CM

\_ _ \

I

C J

, ^ |_

f—

IT

CJ

1 ~-

<VJ

r\j

rj

r\j

rj

u

0)

CP •H

Cm

48

Q

a: t > a on

IxJ IX

'IJ

CD

J

C.J

Q"

a.

" )

CJ

UJ

-J

(. J

UJ

cr

h -

C J

t-

'J

CI

CJ

;J.

U 1

( J

\)

( I

U

t J

tJ

L J

UJ

Q.

UJ

(/I

■SI

a

-J

CD

o <c

M

fd

rH

•Hi

EH

CD -P

c

•H

13 CU >^

:3 cn

0)

e 00

cr> 0) ^ U

-)->

u

Hi m nc! 00 C a^ O U

tn

H

T5 (T3

U •H

m

•H

O 13

a u

o >

5-1

0) CO

cu

O

CO

-i-j

rH

O Xi U) -H

in U

(D •H

P4

49

a"

U J

u I

a

u. ,< ui a:

a ir.

u

t."j

O J.

r J

cr

C 1 C) Cj

cc .J

CJ

a"

CI

f J

i ^. \

1

I

1"-

L' :

O

CTj

I/)

3*

3*

3"

f\J

ru

CD

a)

m

CD O)

(l'^3J) iN3W3ynSb3W 30 N011bA31-j

o

fd <u u

fO

T3

O

X 0) 05

Q)

x: +J

•H (U

fd 00

O ro 00

-p

a -H

O 5-1 w ^

u

(U

CP •H

50

',.U

m

CD

-H

d

R fCi

TJ

U. O

m Pi

■H Q)

(d

C 00

>i

O C

> 00 1-H ON

o cn

•rH

CP

O ^

-P

5-1

O

m

o

in

CJ

Ln

o

in

o

Ln

o

oo

CD

-J'

o

rn

ro

m

CM

OJ

'\J

r\j

r\)

r\j

r\j

f\j

nj

f\i

0) >

a, (u

o w

C/3 0)

U

•H Cm

(113d) iN3W3ynSU3W JD NDIIbA.113

51

a. o

UJ

a-

CD

01

0

fO

(U

u

fd

T5

!h

0

U-\

X

(L)

Pi

Q)

-P

•H

0)

5-1

13

03

(U

e 00

0)

U

C

03

c

-M

fd

U

^

00

en

0

U

U

•rH

■H

U-l

•H

U

(U

a

^

•H

0

14-1

>

0

5-1

(1)

CO

s:

(U

-M

oi

(D

.-H

0

CO

•H

M

IJ1

0

in

0

in

0

to

0

in

0

ID

1/)

CO

-.-r

rr

0

0 1

-r

:r.

m

m

m

OJ

r\j

rv

ro

CM

nj

r\j

r\)

r\)

r\i

(\)

r\i

00

u

0) S-l Hi

tn

■H fa

iN3W3yngb3W 30 N0IibA313

52

o

CL

a

a

(.3

a m

CT

m

nr

cr.

"J

a cr cr

C5

CJ

C3

o

o

o

o

O

o

o

0^

LT)

3'

m

fVI

o

cr

CP

rr

=r

=r

3"

ro

O")

m

f\J

f\j

f\j

r\j

f\J

r\j

r\j

(11

CO

•71

•H

>

m

0)

X!

Xi

•H

h:i

u

(y

1 , W

fd

U

cu

1 I

c

•H

(D

^

t

W

(13

00

0)

as

e

C

(13

0 ro

00

01

x:

tH

0)

CP

1—1

cu

•H

0

:3

H

T3

U

(U

en

•H

iN3W3yn5H3W JO NOIlbAm

53

J a:

Q

a. a'

Lul '/^

ll I

a

tr. -n

cr

CI

O

fd

u cd

fd

(d

fd u

cu

■p

c

-H

(U U

:3

00

c (d

c

CD

>lOO

X

O ^

CP 0) C > -H

O 3

•H

O

H

o >

0)

(u

-p «

0)

o ^

U

CP •H Cm

54

a:

LJ

o

X.

O

■J"

a

".J

i )

; ) C J

a

aj

a

O-l

J

U"

J

OJ

Q'

(_)

L J

LT

tri ; )

^

LJ

LtJ

L.)

Q.

e_)

C.J

Uj

U"

_l

I'D

0

fd

fd

fd

fd

u

c

•H

:3

(d

■"^

e 00

(U

u

c:

fd

-p

(13

u

00

c

a^

0

u

u

-H

■H

o

-H

0

>

0

U

Q)

03

x;

Q)

-p

CD

0

w

•rH

H

u

•H

55

APPENDIX D

Suirniary of tributary habitat survey informtion by reach for tributaries surveyed during 1983 and 1984.

Table Dl .

Summary of tributary habitat survey information by reach for East-side tributaries to Libby Reservoir surveyed during 1983 and 1984.

iLilaitari;

Little JacksonO^ Cr.

Jackson Cr . No. Forkb/ So. Forkt!'

Barron Cr.

Brlstow Cr.

Ms. Fork So. Fork

Ural Cr. ^ b/

Geibler Cr.^^

Parsi

Cr.

Middle Fork No. Fork

Big Cr. Steep Cr. Good Cr. N3. Pork

So. Fork

Drop Cr. Ebst Branch

West Branch

Boulder Cr

Sullivan Cr.

Poverty Cr.*^ ti/

Dodge Cr.

So. Fork ^ No. Fork

Young Cr.

So. Fork

First nurrber is percen second nun\ber

Beasb

Reach length (km)

Stream Sitdfic.

area

Cradle (»1

1

1.0

2

6.7

16.5

3.0

3

9.3

3.5

I

7.3

3

8.9

1.7

3.0

2

4.0

6.5

6.3

3

21.6

2.6

2

2.9

3

11 .7

5.0

4.9

3

z/ .J

3.2

55

3

21.7

5.2

\

1.7

2

2.7

5.0

1.0

2

1.4

5.0

1

2.2

2

8.8

6.2

l.B

2

2.5

7.2

1

2.0

2

3.7

18.4

£ /

3

8.0

4.6

2

2.7

3

18.1

8.7

1

3.1

3

3.5

9.6

1

3.4

2

3.6

16.3

1

12.3

4

194 .0

I

1.6

2

19.0

Xi .4

1

5.0

2

e'.B

6.2

5.2

3

18.5

3.8

3.5

3

11.3

4.5

12.0

4

86.2

2.4

12.1

4

33.9

0.9

3.0

3

9.8

5.6

5.4

3

23.9

2.2

4.1

2

9.3

2.1

4.0

3

11.6

1.2

3.5

4

9.7

12.3

4.8

3

19.7

4.2

5.2

3

46.1

7.6

1.9

2

1.4

7.4

3.1

2

3.5

1.0

1.5

3

2.1

2.9

3.4

3

4.4

3.0

2.3

3

6.5

4.5

3.6

3

12.3

6.9

3.0

2

5.6

12.6

2.4

2

6.7

10.0

1.5

4

1.6

2.5

1.6

4

5.1

1.9

2.8

4

16.6

1.0

2.8

4

16.6

1.0

6.8

4

23.6

4.2

3.1

4

17.5

8.2

2.3

3

16.3

8.3

Average Channel Wetted

Cover n\

fmL InaUsam QisiUfias^ icml iS2kmL

width width

19.5

37.8 10.9 11.6 25.9 18.2

39.1 40.6 23.9 31.4 34.5 38.4

25.4

22.9 30.5 19.2 24.2

15.8

38.1 20.5 48.0 24.1 24.4 19.2 18.6

19O Spawning Gravel

6.1

23.2 5.9

11.1 9.0 9.0

16.1 11.7 10.2 6.6

9.0 6.1

6.1

10.0 7.1 5.1 6.1

2.6

12.5 5.7 4.7 9.7 9.0 7.8 3.8

3.5

74

39/81

44

25.3

26.3 14.3

6.8 4.5

4.5 2.2

36 35

36/37 73/75

7 15

425.7 295.3

28.7 14.8 10.9 16.0

9.6 7.6 5.4 5.0

7.1 3.8 3.3 3.3

54 30 35 35

63/67 45/73 65/80 60/63

40 24 30 27

233.3 12.6 29.3 2.3

20.5

9.7

6.2

56

37/77

27

5.5

15.6 3.0 6.2 5.1 4.4

12.1 10.0 3.7 5.2 4.5 4.9

4.1

4.8 5.9 4.0 3.6

2.0

6.0 4.7 4.3 5.7 5.3 4.9 3.3

31 42 44 51 18

45 33 55 49 42 33

31

23 42 20 21

13

11 41 8 6 6 7 9

19/18 17/65 19/59 40/64 30/41

31/31 15/19 58/55 51/34 28/45 12/3

17/60

37/79 42/68 15/57 7/85

40 43 46 33 25

47 31 29 29 27 19

55

11 13 31 27

65.2 59.5 5.4 106.0 36.5

54.3 23.3 153.5 114.9 47.9 26.1

31.1

18/48 20

8/73 32/64 8/9 3/29 7/76 17/71 14/85

22 21 47 17 29 31 30

461.8 81.9 69.9 51.5

17.4

150.6 34.2 437.8 558.2 346.9 52.5 54.5

of streanfcank with overhead cover less than or pmiai ^n i m -.k^.^ h, .. , , s the percent oe strean*>ank with overhead^To^^r T^er^^^l f7t^l Te'^^leXl^^lT..''' cursory survey identified reach as having limited fish production potential.

56

in 00

0)

u o

U 00 5-1

C

•H

O ■H -U

03 B U

o

4-1

c

■H

CU >i

>

5-1 03

>i 5-1

0)

>

5-1 Z5

Cfi CU 0)

-P 0) •H >,

>i

5-1 O fd 4-> -P

:3 cn

X! CU •H -H 5-^ U +J fd -M

<+-i :=i o ^

■H >i 5-1 5-1 -P fd

e Q) B ^ :=i -H CO in

CM

Q

0)

EH

S H

00 00

00 vo

00 ro

m

(7t vo

CO

iH

00 n

o m

m

ft

1-1

vo

in

in 00

vo 00 1 1

vo

vo

n

in

ro in 1 1

vo

i-H

in

VO

CO ro

vo 1

in

vo

in ^

vo 1

>

>

^ of

uT' in 1

CM

CM

CM rH

ro CM 1

p-

O

o

r- o

53 1

in

r-

vo vo

<^

r-

ro j

in

in

r-

in

(N

CO

in

vo 1

n

in o

vo o

o

CTl

vo

r-l O I

r-

CT>

CO

in

o

r-t O

o

r-

in

00

CM

CM

rH

CM iH

o m I I o vo I

o in fo CM in CO •* CM

00

CO

o o o

CO

o o o r~ ^ vo n

o vo in

in CM o CM

^ f-f CM CM

m CO CM

PO

O iH CM

CO rH 00 cn iH (N

m m CM

0\

CM CT>

r~ rH iH ON in

CO o

eH in n po o 00

CM CM CM

co

CM vo O 00 ^ ro ^

CM 00

O

vo O O O ro CM

vo

vo r- o m rH ro

^ ^ in

vo vo CM ro

rH r-< m rH

04

4J 3 W

u

u U

(U u

•H 3

s:

0)

>

•H

Cm

CL4

o

CO

u

u

o

w u

s

0) rH

ft •H

U

t-l

o

b

O

cn

i-i u

I

c o

(0

5

(1)

o ."^

UH U 3 (fl

U)

U 0)

4J m §^

3 (U (0

5 m

■9 § e 0)

rH 5

O 0) 4J >

l^

°S 01 J=

(/I U

rH U

0) 5

> U

O 3 U UH

0) >

s: o u o

0)

> TJ

o m

0)

5-g

•H 01

5 .5

O (U

in

s

O "4-1 u O

.4J rH

c 5 0)

4J tn <u

57

APPENDIX E

Near-shore floating and sinking gill net catches (number of fish per net night) by species in the

three areas of Libby Reservoir during 1983 and 1984.

in

m iH rH rO I I

VO O O O I

I o

I Ol •<3' I I O rH {N

CO CN

O V

CO

CM O rH CNJ r-H

I— I O O O

j j I fn o r-i

! I I O CM rH CD

cr» 00 ro iH IT) iH •••••

CM in iH rH O O

1 T <X> ^

I o

I O rH «X)

■H iH rH «

rH O

r»- iH CM iH ^ <V3

00 r~ CM CM CM o m r-i

00 rO ^ O rH 00

o o I tN o r- ro o

00 vo

rH m

o o o

"H rH I

I I I o o o

o o

V

I I I I rH

I I I I o

iH rH m CTt VO I .

I O O O «H O

rH in

o o

I CNJ rH CM

I I I O O O

I rH rH 00 <y> 1 «

I O O in rH O

rH 00 CO

O CM O

V

CM r~ m vo vo

a

o "fl* <£> ■'3'

in CM in CO 00

•••••

rH CM CM CM 1^ rH rH ro rH

ro

o

CM ro ro

vo rH r~ vo in

O O rH CM ro rH

^ rH in o

O O O CM CM CM

a\ ^

O C3 <S

cr> rH CT^ rH in 00

•••••

O O O rH rH rH

in CO «^ r«- 00 <Ti

•••••

o o o in m CN

ro CO

o o o

in <T> r~ rH •••••

CN O rH CM CM rH

ro o ro CT» in cr>

•••••

O rH rH in

in in o^

rH CM rH

CM ^ tr O O O

o o ^ o o

r-i r-i i-i ^ f-i

^ O CN rH CN

(1)

ro

ro ro CO ro ro ro

00 00 0> 00 00 00 <Ti CT^ rH CTi (Tl <Tv

>i -U . .

rH tJiai4J > U

^ ^ CO 00 ^

00 00 cr> m ^ 00 o> o\ rH rH 00 cr>

t-t t-H m rH

j:: rH rH

r O -H ^ <U

00 ^if 00 CT> 00

(j\ i-i cr\

58

so Ci

o b

s

O I

>i -U

i-H DiDj-U > O

iH CN . - O -H (1)

I i

CO

CM

r vo

in

ro

1

1

i

u

vo o

o

o

1 CM

iH iH

00 <N in cs

1

1

1

rH CO

1

1 1

CM

iH

o

1

o o

sH O

Q)

fo CM 00 ro

1

o

O

in

1 o

u 1 r~i

^ r~i

\^

iH oj ph

rH CM rH

\^ \ji

«

o

CO

O

O rH

ro o

CO CM

CM

rH

0\ CO

1

<^ rH

i-H

in

00

1

CM

rH CM

iH f-H

1

rH 0%

ro

1

1

g

O

o

o

1

O

O O

CM O

1

O O

o

V

>>

1

1

CN

CO 0\

1

1 rH

o

1

! 1

m

O

1

1

o

O

CM rH

1

1 o

rH

1

vo

rH

t-i

CM

rH

rH 0%

1

rH rH

ro

o

1

i

1

o

O

o

CM O rH

0\ rH

1

o o

rH

V rH

CO

r-> CO

r-» 00

in

ro

a

CM

m

in

rH

CM rr

rH

CM rH

ro

■H

rH

rH

CM ro

rH

in

00

m

in 00

in in

in

cTi in

rH

*

»

9

iH

t-i

rH

ro

o m

V£> CM

rH

o o

rH

n

CM

00

■•4'

o

r>. o

O 00

in

ro vo

o

(N

o

o

in

o ^

rH <Tv

ro

o o

o

rH rH

O

o

in

t-~ in o

CM in

in

in vo

ro

(N

CN

CM

CM in

rH O

rH

rH rH

o O

O O

« 00 O ^^CN

5^

O

rH

rH rH

rH rH

CM rH

CM

ro

CO

ro CO

ro ro

^ 00 00 "sr

^ 00

00

CO cr>

CO CO

^ CO <y> cTi ^ 00

00 <y\

a\

o^ rH <y> o^

CO CT^ rH rH 00 CT>

Cr> rH

00

rH

rH

rH rH

0> rH 0> rH

rH

a\

ro

rH •» ""rH

rH

00

•>rH ^ -

-in

vo CM

CO in cTt

-ro CM CM -CM

ro CM

CM

rH

rH rH

rH

CM CM ro rH

rH

00

59

ro VD o in

» « «

r-« rH cs m

-1 I 1

O I I V

<M ^ CO

9 9m

04 o m

t o o

in CO

o o

00 vo o vo

^ O ^ >H O

(S] vo ^

CO <N O

^ iH ""I" 00 VO

CN r~- iH o o CO iH CS

^ vo ^

O 00 iH

CM ro vo

o o o

iH ro ro

e

o o o

I I I ^. I

I I I O I

I rH (N CN| in

I

I o o o o

o o

o\ in

3 -H a

o ^ in <N vo «

tN O tN in 00

l£> r~ iH Q

S

rH O iH fH fO Cl,

"sj* ro in

o in in

iH 00 m

O rH iH

in rH rH

m O rH

O CN CNi

O T CO

00 ^ o

r-i i-< r-i i-i

CM rH CM

m

fO CO CO ro ro

^ CO ^

00 00 00 00

00 CTt 00

CTl rH 0^ OS

OS rH Ol

rH rH rH rH

iH rH

«. m

>. k CVl ^ 00

fcCM «•

00 00 tN O VO

VO CM

CN rH CM rH rH

rH ^ rH

>1 -tj

rH cn D^OJ > O

cfi'Hj >

60

in o

in in o

rH O rH

m O

rH O

o in m tn o o •••••

00 O 00 VD (H ro iH

in o o o in in •••••

rH in CO 'S' o vo

in as

o in o j iH o cs I

I in in

I rH O

in o o o o o

VO rH O rH Ol CM rH

in I o o in in

I

o I cs rH ON ro

eg

o in in in o o

cTi r~- o r*^ cTi

rH in rH rO rH

in o o o in o

{N in "sj" ^ vo

>-H CN T

o

o

CN

in in o o

r~» ^ ro ^

o

o o o in in

CNJ <N rH ^ in

O CN

o in

iH O

o ro I 1 o I

in o

1 I

O rH I

in in in o m cn o

c e « 9

OOf-ld— lOO O iH

in

o

in o

•13 5 d

0)

o

in

in

in

o

O

o o in in in

in

«

rH

vo in

iH

rH

CN

CS CVJ rH O O O

O

o

1

in

1

1

1

in j in j 1 j

1

1

1

1

«

o

1

1

1

O 1 O ! 1 !

1

1

1

in

in

1

1

O

i 1 1 ! 1 !

1

1

1

o

o

1

1

«H

1

1

O

in

o

in

o

O

in o o in 1 in

in

1

rH

in

in

rH

rH

rH

rH CM rH O i O

o

o

C^J

cs

CN

CN

rH

CM CN CM CN CM CN

CO

00

m

00

ro

ro

n

^ 00 00

CJN

CO

00

CTl

00 00

00

00 CO ON ON ^ CO

rH

cr>

cr>

rH

a>

o\

CTl

OS ON rH rH 00 ON

00

rH

rH

rH

rH

rH

r-i r-\ ON rH

ON

" - rH

rH

CJN

«. •'CO CO >•

rH

in

in

»H

r~

VO rH rH CM

CV)

iH

rH

rH

rH

rH CM rH rH

4->

rH CM

O -H Q)

rH D^-U > O

II

61

in IT* in in tn

iH O rH O O

moo 1 ir> «x> I

O rH fH I O ID

o in in o m

iH in ro

CM (N rH

in m m o o CM •••••

rO in rH o ro

Q m If)

t-t O C4

in in o in o

rH <T( 00 ^

in o in o o

e

o ro r«» cNi «

in o in in o

«5 r- in o

«N cvi in in m

o in o in o CM fs vo cNj o a>

rH £N m

in o in

9

00 o

m o o o o

in «T> in <Ni

rH rH

in o

o m I o m o . » « »

rH O I r-{ r-tO

moo

O 0

O rH rH

o m tn o m CO

9 ® 01 O O 0

HI «NI rH m CM (— I

lo-l !

1 i 1 ° M

1 i 1 m 1 1

o m o m m

e « s Q

00 m rH £N

m o m o o oj m rH CN «^ ro

o m o 1 o I

rH O rH I rH

m o

rH ro

i z «. ! m o

I o

rH 1

m O rH O M O

o o I mow

CM OO I CN iH g CN CN CS CM U

o o m m m m

e « o $ a CO rH rH Csl

Ol CM CM CM CM O

ro

fO ro 00 oo ro

CO 00 CTi CO CO <T> <Tl iH <Ti

VD CM 00 m CM rH r-i r-i

>1 -JJ

ro ^

CO 00 00

po 00 crv ^ 00

00 m rH rH 00 Ol CT» rH OS rH

rH •> ""rH

00 CM CM fc. CM CM CM OO rH

£ rH CM O -H CJ XJ >H M >i C

62

3

I in o IT) I I I

I O tH O I

o

m in LD o in

r~ CTv CN 00 cH

I I

I O O O I

CM

o

o in in o o *

iH in fo ro CN

CN

o

in in in in o

o

cTi oi CM in

CM

CO

o

Cm

in o o in in

o CM r- in iH

o

CP

I S I

9

O

5 Oj

4->

in

1

in in in

in

1

1

o

1

O O rH

o

1

1

1

in

in

1

1

1

iH O 1

iH

rH

o

o in o

O

CN

o

CM

>H CN CN

CN

1

1

1

1

1

1

O r-i 1

o

I

o

in

o

! i i

1

iH

1 1 1

o

1

O

in in o

in

in

1

iH

O »H CM

o

o

U

CM

CN

CM CN CN O

M

cn

ro

00 m ro

CO

00

<T> CO 00

oo

00

rH CTl CTl

(J\

■-I

iH

rH rH

fH

f-\

w CN -

CO

00

CM O WD

<o

CM

iH

r-i

>l

cn

■^4j >

o

m

>

63

APPENDIX F

Annual catches (number of fish per net night) of fish in floating gill nets set during the fall and sinking gill nets set during the spring in Libby Reservoir 1975-1984.

Table Fl. Average catch per net night in floating gill nets set during the fall in the Tenmile and Rexford areas of liibby Reservoir in 1975 1976, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1982, and 1984.^

Yfiai

Parameter 1975 1976 1978 1979 1980 1982 1983 1984 1977

Surface

temperature (°C) 16.1

Number of nets 129

Average catch of

RB

2.8

2.0

0.0

Total Salmo

4.8

MWF

2.0

CRC

4.0

SQ

4.2

RSS

3.3

W

<0.1

CSU

1.9

KDK

0.0

Total

20.2

17.2 15.6 16.7 15.6

31

/o

T3 16

1 Q

/y

3.6

6.3

4.9

4.8

2.5

2.0

1.4

1.2

0.0

OJ.

<0.1

<oa

6.1

8.4

6.3

6.0

2.3

1.2

1.4

0.6

4.2

3.0

6.5

8.8

4.7

4.2

2.1

1.9

7.9

7.3

2.0

0.5

<0.1

<0.1

0.1

0.2

2.4

0.9

1.1

1.2

0.0

0.0

0,2

0.0

27.6

25.0

19.7

19.2

range

16.7 16.3 15,6 7.6 to 17 70 24 28 24

2.4

1.9

1.5

1.2

0.7

0.7

<0.1

1^

0.4

3.6

4.2

2.6

1.0

0.4

0.8

15.1

12.6

11.0

3.5

1.9

1.3

0.2

0.7

0,2

<0.1

0.0

0.1

1.2

0.4

0,2

7.1

0.3

6,5

31.7

20.5

22.7

5,4 3,5

^ Catches prior to 1983 reported by Huston et al. (1984) '4.

^ Abbreviations explained in "Methods" section under "Fish Abundance..."

^ Prior to 1983 very few hybrids were identified as such, although they were probably present in the samples.

64

Table F2. Average catch per net night in sinking gill nets set during the spring in the Rexford area of Libby Reservoir in 1975, 1976, 1978, 1980, 1982, and 1984.^

Parameter 1975 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984

Surface tempertaure (°C)

Number of nets

Average catch of:^ RB CT

RB X WCIV

MWF v; CRC

NSQ '

RSS

DV

LING

CSU

FSU

Yp -

Total

12.8

12.2

11.1

11.1

11.7

12.7

111

41

41

38

36

20

0.8

0.3

1 A

1.4

0.7

1 A

1.4

0.2

0.4

0.4

0.2

0.4

<0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

<0.1

0.6

6.6

6.4

7.2

1.0

2.1

2.9

0.3

1.0

0.7

7.2

24.3

59.2

2.3,

, 1.2

5.8

2.8

4.3

8.0

^ 1.4

2.8

0.7

1.9

2.5

1.4

1.9

2.2

0.8

1.5

1.8

<0.1

0.2

0.3

0.6

0.5

0.4

37.3

26.1

23.5

36.3

18.6

63.2

7.9

11.1

9.1

5.8

10.9

5.6

0.0

0,0

0.0

0.0

0,2

0,8

56.8

50.0

53.4

56.1

66.0

147.5

^ Catches prior to 1984 reported by Huston et al. (1984)

^ Abbreviations explained in "Methods".

^ Prior to 1984 very few hybrids were identified as such, although they were probably present in the samples

^ Numbers of redside shinres were not recorded in 1975, although several hundred were caught

65

APPENDIX G

Vertical distributions of fish and zooplankton compared to temperature profiles and euphotic zone depths by date in two areas of Libby Reservoir during 1983 and 1984.

u

< U

H U 2

O

<

u

M EH

>

00

CO

o

.-I •H

B C

Eh

o

>

Q

*M ^

CM

u 3:

u

o o

Eh

LD

o

(ui) Hidaa

66

67

U4

O ^4

u u

W 2

M U O [5

> Q

Eh

W U

> :s

CQ

00

o

Q) i-i •H

£s

C 0) Eh

CM

*H

. O

(Ti CO

ld

w

(ui) Hidaa

69

Eh < U

EH

W

M O

u

M

w >

00

in ro I

rH

•H

e

0)

O

>

a

u IS

u

CQ

vH ra«Nir4 <\!^>* (^"^-^T* CNi '-i*4*4»*

, o

o

S W

ro

O

ro

ro

O

70

71

72

73

74

75

Dm

EC U

W

2 > Q

<; cQ

M

W U

> ;s

CQ

00 00

T5 M O

(U

U

76

En 12

00

as

T3

u

O M-l X

CD

o

>

Q

Eh < U

E-i W

M EH

<: m

M Eh

W >

Eh U

CQ

CM H <M

u

s

Eh

(ui) Hidaa

77

fa :s a

IS

80

(/) rO «sD (Ti CN LO

83

(ui) Hidaa

85

86

APPENDIX H

Timing of juvenile and adult movanent through traps located in Bristow, Big, Young, Fivemile, and For tine creeks during 1984 and tag return information for 1983 and 1984.

7-

6-

5-

4-

15 I 16 1 17

WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUt[] RAINBOW TROUt| RBxWCT HYBRID0

18 Tl9

20 JUNE

21 24

1^2546

27 Va-id

1 I 2-111 12 I13-ia 17

JULY

25-

20-

15-

10-

westslope cutthroat trout[]

RAINBOW TROUt| RBxWCT HYBRID0

n

i\ iil'U\ '^5 » 'i6 I 'i7 I 'i'^ I S5 I 20 I 51 I 85 Ig3 I 54 I S5 I S6 I » I'ifi I S5 1 30 I T I i I S' I '4 I'S 1*6 17 I'B

JUNE JULY

Figure HI. Timing of adult (top) and juvenile (bottom) trout movement downstream through a trap located in Bristow Creek during 1984.

87

14-

12-

10-

B--I

2 -

16 iH-aa 1

JUNE

WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUtQ

rainbow trout i rbxwct hybridQ

41

[A

maw

17 I 18 I 19 I 20 I 21

120-

110-

100-

90-

80-

60-

40-

30-

20-

10-

185

I

WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUtQ RAINBOW TROUT^ RB « WCT HYBR1D0

~^\J Pi8 Pig P20 1^ [l2 r23fl4P2S

12 I 13 JULY

Figure H2. Timing of adult (top) and juvenile (bottom) trout movement downstream through a trap located in Big Creek during 1984.

88

00 CD

T—

I

UJ

oc o

z

5

I-

o

oc

§

QC X

O UJ

a.

LU

CZ3

ii

o

oo

o> z

c

3S

I I I I I I I I r

ou)Oi/)Oinou)0

in

J" Ui

% Z

J- 3

CM

Ui

"I r

m o

(0

0)

c e

0)

a fd

o u

0)

-p c o

c (d

e (d

(U

-p

cn

;3

-p

c

0) 0)

> o

00

tn C •H

Ti

M

CU (U

u

-P Cn

o a u o

-P >H

-P c

.-I -H

fd 0) -P

14-1 fd o u o

a

-H cu B fd

•H

H -P

u

tn •H

o

CM

HSId JO ON

3?

*>"

36- 32- 28-

UJ

i «

12- 8-

WESTSlOPe CUTTHROAT TTOUT I RAINBOW TROUT Qr8>WCT HYBRID

■iillL-Ti m -0-4!

APRIL

la ' 'ii '12 'a '24 'as 'm'ii MwaoJiiaJ** MAY JUNE

40-1

36

32-

2S-

1

i w-

7 > 10 II 11 U V4 II W'l; W ll'JO 21 22 21 24212<2l2*2Slei 2 1 4 « I i t BIIUU'UUMiri* JUNE JULY

32- 28

is 20

la'^n'^t •■31 <

ii'20'21 '22'a'a4'2s'a|j3o'aiji,jM'i»'i^Jao'ji 'ja^^'a'jjji,^'^ 'tjs 'lo'ii'^i^Ji Vij^^a'i^'ai '22'2j'»4' jj'ayi,^ J ""^o JUUr AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NQWCMMR

Figure H4. Timing of juvenile trout movement downstream through a trap located in Young Creek during 1984.

90

LU

ai cc o m

111 > u.

-P Cn

C C

0) -H

e U

0) > O

e ^

0)

4-> (U

O U U

-P 0) .—I

-H

g e

O 0)

-p >

-P -H O Xi

^ c

•H

Q) -^

•H (D

C -P

dj fd

> u

:3 o

•p

o -p

CP -P o

3 ^

fd

o

fd

Q)

u

CP -P

•H d ^

g > 00 •H O CTi Eh 13 ^

r 1 r

CO CM T-

HSId J0d3ai/\inN

HSIddOON

0)

CP •H

91

FORTINE CREEK

X

(O

E u. O

d

20- 19- 18- 17- 16- 15- 14- 13- 12- 11 - 10- 9- 8- 7- 6- 5

4H 3 2 1

QwESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT I RAINBOW TROUT QrBxWCT HYBRID

19 20

22 ' 23 24 25 JULY

27 ■28tjo' 1

AUGUST

Figure H6. Timing of juvenile trout movement downstream through a trap located in Fortine Creek during 1984.

92

Table HI. Tag return information for adult trout tagged in Libby Reservoir and its tributaries during 1983 and 1984.

Tagging Infomatioo-

Return Information

LocatiOTi Tagged

Tag#

Date

Sp3/ L

Wt Date

Lb/

h/ . r/

we^/ Location'^/

2494

06/15/83

WCT

407

544

11/05/83

381

680

Black Lake Bay (LK)

2493

06/15/83

398

526

07/04/83

Big Creek

2499

06/15/83

WCT

401

526

10/— /83

No location

2554

06/06/83

wrr

372

456

08/26/83

330

526

Mouth of Tobacco R. (IK)

2569

06/07/83

425

09/24/83

406

454

Mouth of Barren Ck. (liC)

2598

06/10/83

WCT

397

544

07/03/83

356

Mouth of Elk R. (IK)

2780

06/17/83

WCT

370

816

09/23/83

394

567

Westbank Tenmile (LK)

2790

06/18/83

WCT

375

517

08/11/83

Lower Elk River, B.C.

2795

06/19/83

WCT

395

535

09/— /83

406

317

Peck Gulch (LK)

3438

06/25/83

WCT

380

536

08/10/83

440

963

S.P. Tobacco Bay (LK)

3448

06/28/83

WCT

305

249

11/16/83

War land area (LK)

3460

06/29/83

WCT

395

526

09/30/83

395

680

Koocanusa Bridge (LK)

3807

07/02/83

WCT

380

425

10/22/83

381

680

Sutton Creek Bay (LKl . So. Pt. Bristow (LK)°/

3439

06/23/83

WCT

391

580

05/22/84

391

473

4094

06/14/84

WCT

392

530

06/18/84

381

No Location

4068

06/16/84

WCT

402

621

06/16/84

393

567

Peck Gulch (LK)

2584

06/08/83

HB

417

448

04/29/84

445

907

Mouth of Young Ck. (LK)

2593

06/09/83

WCT

380

47

04/29/84

356

No location

3450

06/29/83

WCT

405

522

04/29/84

356

No location

4058

06/08/84

WCT

381

544

06/16/84

\J\J/ JL\J/ U*t

406

Above Sutton Ck. (LK)

4185

07/02/84

ILD

"KfO

SI 7

Mouth Young Ck. (IZ.)

4127

06/15/84

\J\j/ z>v/ ot

406

Murray Bay (LK)

3815

07/14/83

V J/ yf±/ OH

Tobacco Bay (LK)

4043

06/07/84

HJlKJ

SRI

UD/ V // O**

Ana

907

No location

5867

07/16/84

WCT

359

366

07/22/84

356

Mouth Young Ck. (UC)

2575

06/07/83

WCT

395

550+

07/11/84

381

Fivemile a. (LK)

4021

06/05/84

WCT

407

713

06/17/84

406

East side of Dam (LK)

4066

06/09/84

WCT

407

576

06/13/84

356

454

Rexford area (LK)

2783

06/16/83

WCT

406

521

06/22/84

406

793

Fivemile Creek

3426

06/21/83

WCT

376

481

08/09/84

431

By Libby Dam (LK)

3398

06/16/84

w:^'

410

598

08/13/84

406

In front of Dam (UC)

2594

06/09/83

WCT

387

512

09/— /84

No location

4012

06/04/84

WCT

371

571

09/~/84

No location

4182

07/18/84

WCT

382

544

09/08/84

356

Above dam east (LK)

5856

07/05/84

WCT

380

490

09/07/84

406

907

10 miles below Rex (LK)

4310

07/06/84

WCT

406

520

07/07/84

416

793

Peck Gulch (LK)

4299

07/21/84

HB

450

550

07/22/84

431

Left side by dam (LK)

5527

06/28/84

WCT

390

586

09/09/84

381

454

2 Mi. S. Peck Gulch (LK)

4342

07/19/84

w::^'

362

444

09/08/84

356

East above dam (LK)

4346

07/19/84

HE

352

550

09/23/84

Mouth Barren (LK)

5489

06/19/84

WCT

377

455

07/13/84

1/2 mi. No. Dam (U?)

5544

07/05/84

RB

404

488

07/12/84

Westshore Dam (IK)

3488

06/19/84

WCT

395

424

07/26/84

No location

5524

06/27/84

RB

405

430

07/19/84

381

Peck canpground (LK)

5539

07/02/84

RB

359

339

07/19/84

317

Kootenai River

5560

07/11/84

HB

401

415

07/11/84

406

West shore above Dam (LK)

5546

07/06/84

WCT

357

351

11/16/84

304

2 mi. So. Bridge (LK)

4224

07/18/84

RB

365

410

08/04/84

279

Mouth of Pinkham Ck. (LK)

4226

07/18/84

w::r

378

402

08/04/84

279

Mouth of Pinkham Ck. (LK)

4216

07/02/84

WCT

352

412

11/30/84

406

Kootenai River below dam

fjah.Ttap

Young Creek:

Big Creek:

Five Mile:

Pinkham:

93

Table . Continued

Taaainq Informaticn

Return Infonnation

Location

Tagged

Tag# Date Sp L Wt Date

L Wt Location

Bristw:

f\C /I Q /QA

Uo/iy/o4

wcr

0//Uj/o4

noutn 01 canyon CK. (LK)

Purse Seine

TemLle-Acea

Sutton Creek

5461

05/04/84

RB

302

315

AA / /A J

08/ /84

425

Canada area (UC)

2E

2601

11/28/83

WCT

308

278

T O '/AT /OT

12/01/83

noutn or Warland Ck. (LK)

Rexford Area

S. Border Buoy

5197

04/10/84

RB

340

417

04/28/84

343

227

Koocanusa Bridge (LR)

Young Cr. Bay:

5159

03/29/84

VCT

405

743

06/03/84

406

Above bridge (LK)

5161

03/29/84

HB

313

349

06/11/84

406

Rexford boat temp [IK)

5155

03/29/84

RB

308

313

06/05/84

311

340

Koocanusa

5132

03/29/84

RB

432

694

07/04/84

Gold Creek

5163

03/29/84

HB

357

481

08/13/84

406

793

Near Dam (LK)

5160

03/29/84

VCT

358

481

06/10/84

330

340

Canyon Creek

So. Pt. Young:

5112

03/29/84

WCT

310

331

06/16/84

330

Above Souse Gulch (LK)

5120

03/29/84

RB

348

440

09/— /84

No location

5116

03/29/84

382

626

07/12/84

NO location

Far So. Tobacco:

5177

03/30/84

wcr

304

290

05/27/84

304

Rexford Point (LK)

5174

03/30/84

WCT

387

608

08/11/84

393

1134

5 mi. N. Elk River (LK)

So. Hurray Spg.

5071

03/28/84

RB

399

653

04/24/84

397

653

N. pt. Fivemile (IJC)°/

N.N.Pt. Tobacco;

5045

03/28/84

RB

417

712

08/09/84

432

West shore above dam (LK)

5188

04/09/84

HB

337

432

04/03/84

468

North of Bridge (li?)

5065

03/28/84

WCT

316

362

08/27/84

432

680

L. Koocanusa

5061

03/28/84

WCT

296

249

10/01/84

Mouth of Wigwam, B.C.

5055

03/28/84

WCT

403

667

05/15/84

432

Behind Dam (LK)

5051

03/28/84

WCT

387

607

04/15/84

406

Near Bridge {IK)

5186

04/09/84

WCT

338

431

05/02/84

330

680

Tenmile area (LK)

5411

05/01/84

RB

332

386

06/14/84

330

340

Btwn Marina & Warland (LK)

5262

04/13/84

WCT

334

335

06/11/84

330

453

Behind dam (LK)

Tobacco Bay:

5001

03/26/84

RB

353

544

06/20/84

330

Mouth of Boulder Ck. (LK)

5254

04/12/84

RB

325

367

06/— /84

330

Mouth of Pinkham Ck. (LK)

5003

03/26/84

WCT

398

689

05/27/84

386

Tobacco River

5440

05/02/84

HB

352

490

06/14/84

No location

5078

03/28/84

RB

420

816

06/23/84

1355

793

Mouth of Pinkham Ck. (LK)

5438

05/02/84

WCT

319

353

05/27/84

680

No location

5089

03/28/84

RB

386

608

04/20/84

368

567

Rexford area (LK)

5004

03/26/84

HB

401

734

07/01/84

406

793

Mouth of Parsnip Ck. (LK)

Far So. Tobacco

5180

03/30/84

WCT

418

721

05/25/84

470

Bristow Ck.

Sullivan Creek:

5228

04/14/84

WCT

398

671

05/22/84

409

648

S. pt. Tenmile Ck. (LK)** ,

5232

04/12/84

RB

416

762

06/15/84

413

716

N. pt. Fivemile Ck. (LK)^

5227

04/12/84

WCT

280

245

09/13/84

330

453

2 ml. S. Peck Gulch (LK)

5021

03/27/84

RB

430

703

08/— /84

425

Canada area {IK)

5022

03/27/84

RB

335

403

11/07/84

330

Koocanusa

Poverty Creek:

5210

04A2/84

WCT

302

317

06/22/84

318

West above dam (LK)

5218

04/12/84

HB

447

839

05/08/84

431

Koocanusa Bast (LK)

94

Table . Continued

lagging. InfOCnatiai Return Infonnation

Location

Tagged

Tag*

Date

Sp

L

Wt

Date

L

Wt

Location

Mouth Elk:

5365

04/19/84

DV

541

1415

08/30/84

558

1588

Wigwam River

5363

04/19/84

WCT

310

312

08/31/84

374

680

Wigwam River

5368

04/19/84

VICT

338

367

08/10/84

304

Elk Dam, Elk River

Kikomun;

5332

04/17/84

RB

376

562

07/24/84

368

340

Peck Gulch (LK)

5327

04/17/84

RB

443

816

06/04/84

355

Just above bridge [IK)

N. Kikomun:

5351

04/18/84

RB

250

190

04/— /84

Mouth Kikomun (LK)

5338

04/18/84

WCT

326

371

06/03/84

Mouth Kikomun CLK)

Bristow Creek:

511

07/14/83

RB

445

585

06/14/84

435

626

Big Bend (LK)'^

779

06/20/83

VCT

410

550+

10/12/83

381

Canada (LK)

773

06/20/83

WCT

390

484

09/20/83

386

571

S. pt. Tenmile Ck. (LK)'

Big Creek:

742

06/28/83

WCT

384

412

Big Creek

218

07/14/83

HB

416

534

12/— /83

No location

Bristow Creek

443

06/27/83

HB

372

412

05/18/84

406

Parsnip Mouth (LK)

6/

^ Species abbreviations explained in the "Methods" section.

°' Lengths and weights for returns were often estimates from anglers.

^/ (LK) designates Libby Reservoir.

°^ These returns were captured in our sairpling gear.

95

Table H2. Tag return information for juvenile trout tagged with

dangler tags in Libby Reservoir tributaries during 1983 and 1984. Species abbreviations were explained in the "Methods" section. Lengths and weights of returned fish were estimated by anglers.

Taaaina Informaticai

Return Information

Location

Tagged

Tag#

Date

Sp

L

Wt

Date

L

Wt

Location

Pifih Trap

Young Creek:

5455

06/08/83

HB

168

47

10/09/83

304

Below Elk River (LK)

356

06/21/83

WCT

195

70

10/— /83

228

War land area (LK)

2082

06/30/84

WJT

213

109

09/08/84

241

Souse Gulch (LK)

3553

07/19/84

WCT

192

76

09/27/84

254

150

Kokomun Creek, B.C.

561

06/21/84

WCT

142

29

08/— /84

B.C., Canada

2532

07/11/84

WCT

156

40

08/07/84

177

Rexford Cairpground (LK)

Big Creek:

890

06/18/83

WCT

160

38

08/14/83

203

Kootenai River below dam

971

06/19/83

HB

180

54

08/21/83

265

Peck Gulch (LK)

480

06/27/83

HB

150

32

08/02/83

177

Big Creek

852

06/30/83

HB

184

54

07/30/83

Big Creek

880

07/01/83

WCT

156

33

12/— /83

No location

889

06/18/83

HB

169

39

05/— /84

279

Mouth Young Creek (LK)

960

07/09/84

WCT

151

30

07/— /84

Big Creek . Tenmile area (LK)^

2602

07/06/84

WCT

141

22

08/21/84

189

54

3199

07/09/84

WCT

164

37

09/— /84

No location

2912

07/04/84

HB

136

17

152

Big Creek

482

06/21/83

WCT

204

74

07/22/83

Big Creek

Captured in our sampling gear.

96

APPENDIX I

Food habits information for fish collected during August 1983 from Libby Reservoir

& .a

u XI

a am

u «

in js

(0

•;3

•r4

<0

o

'8

O

1 1

1 U-) 1 1

1 ^ 1

1 3 M

i-t CI

o in

^ r^ rH r~ oi m I o

00

CTl >£> £N a\ CO

iH r- in n in o in

(n "s? in CO ^

in iH r-( o> I* f-- 00 tN in (n in CN|

CO

oovoo^inoor-iro

^ Tr r- n ro fs

in

Minvovovo"<rrooo

o o o o o o ro po ro fO ro ro ro. ro fO, fO V) /^ V) A v| A

97

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I

V

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

222221 I I I I I I I

V V

«-( f-H fN O) iH I r-i O O O O O I O

m o

o

1-1

so *

m

o

o

(N

00 ^ o ro o in 1-4

O

o

o iH m oo

tH O O O

otfHt-iooairooiH | I rn

iH i-l rH V I I

loool looool I i

o\r»minooo»inwvooori»o<N

o o o o o o ro m ro ro

(*> ro ro CO CO vt A v| A v| A|

ill

98

I Eh I I t^ [ I

.a

00 O rH ^ 00

EH Eh

Eh

O

00

o

u

o

vo t-" in ^ c>i I I

O O i-H O CS I I

2

CO rH iH in 1 -Eh - Eh

o o o o I

^ J

a i!

•r-

o

u

5

I I Eh I I I Eh Eh

■3

^ n m <Ti 00 <N

o

tn '4< 00 in o 00 iH

5

o

•H

EH EH Eh

cooooitm<*"!j'VD

■U CO

o o o o o o CO ro ro CO ro ro ro ro, ro CO CO v1 A v| A M /\

(J

a

en

00'

99

I'^iiiaiiii^ii

O O I

(N p-i r- n r~

CI CO CM rH

vecsmr^veoi I cs cm m in cs

ISI i 1^1 I I 1^1 I

I I t I I I I I I I I I I

m I I I I I I I I I I I

CO j j 00 00

o r- o CO o

CM CM

I I

or^or-o I CO I mm | loo

I I P; I SIS I a

o r~ o in o o in vo m vo r- vo m 04

I I s I I I p;§*R I I "

ooofooinmoi-i I «*> I r-

M O 00 CO I I

omoinooootnr-r-inr- or-a\|oiooooaovorooo(o

o o o o o o f> m ro CO ro CO d n fo v| /\ v( A V A

r-l

2J

100

■I

O

tS iH N fH O O O O

^ tN ro ■H O O O

o

rH ^ ^

O O O

1 '~i

m

in

(M 1

o

O O

o

o

o

in

00 o <N cTi o in ro

«» I o »-t

fM o ^ ^ M

VO

o

iH CM

o o o

» 00 rH r-

o cs o o

(SMincocororH'S'inr-rHmvo

i£>r-r-{^ocrir~cri(N'X>c-io<T> eommvoincor^TrrotN

r- t-t r-l 1^ •«*•-( r-i

o o o o o o ro CO fo

d fo ro CO ro v| A. V) y\ v| /\

101

I H I I I f I

I I I H I I

O O

o o

O <Tl fO O

H Eh o o o o

<s ff> a\ ^ VO fH cN in in

O iH <-l O E-l O O O r-l O

o o o o o

1-1 in cs m o>

o o H o o o o o o o o

o 1^ o o

00 ^ ro 00 i> VO iH {VI in o o o o o o o o o o

VO 00 <H I VO O O I

o o o H <

O O O I

00 VO

o a\ o ot o o

o o o

•H m in CO ^ m M 1-1 * o> in n iH o (vi oi VO m o o iH 00 o ro o o o

o o o o o o o

o o

O tl

VO ^ ^ 00 (*> c>i i-t cs 00 r- <N r- ininocsoMroE-i « o o o o o o

o o o o o o o

o

H Eh O

1-1

O iH

o o o o

vor~a»mr~r-i^o vor~<Nr~mcviaicN

O<*>'«S'iHfl0<S»O CNOOOiHOOm

oooooooo

o o o o o o ro ro f> ro CO ro. o ro. <*> fO ro Vj y\ V| A V /S

on

00 VO

102

APPENDIX J

Average estimted densities and conposition (%) of zooplankton by genera in three areas of Libby Reservoir, 1983-84

Table Jl. Mean zooplankton densities (#/l)and per cents (in

parentheses) estimated from 0-30 m vertical tows during 1983 in the Tenmile area of Libby Reservoir.

Uaynn±a.

08/16/83

1.20

0.35

1.72

0.74

0.04

4.05

(30)

(9)

(42)

(18)

(1)

08/29/83

0.80

0.16

2.76

1.40

0.01

5.13

(15)

(3)

(54)

(27)

(1)

09/06/83

1.44

0.34

3.25

1.94

6.97

09/21/83

1.81

0.06

5.86

5.45

13.18

\^'*}

10/05/83

1.85

T

2,54

1.66

( ■)

10/17/83

1.80

0.01

1.98

1.37

5.16

(35)

(T)

(38)

(27)

(— )

11/01/83

0.78

T

1.40

1.26

0.01

3.45

(23)

(T)

(40)

(36)

(1)

12/06/83

0.43

1.35

1.07

2.85

(15)

(-)

(47)

(38)

(-)

103

Table J2. Mean zooplankton densities (#/l)and percents (in

parentheses) estimated from 0-30 m vertical tows during 1984 in the Tenmile area of Libby Reservoir.

Date

Daphnia

Bosmina

Cyclops

Diaptomus

Epischura

Total

01/06/84

0.55

2.29

0.84

0.04

3.72

It c\

(15)

(— -)

(62)

(22)

(1)

01/16/84

0.53

3.79

1.44

0.01

5.77

(9)

(— )

(66)

(25)

(T)

02/02/84

2.56

0.05

4o81

2.11

9.53

(27)

(1)

(50)

(22)

(— )

03/05/84

0.28

0.02

1.47

0.97

2.74

(10)

(1)

(54)

(35)

(— )

04/03/84

0.28

0.02

1.20

0.87

2.37

(12)

(1)

(50)

(37)

(— )

04/23/84

0.59

0.03

0.88

0.62

2.12

(28)

(1)

(42)

(29)

(— )

05/08/84

0.60

0.04

0.79

0.73

2.16

(28)

(2)

(36)

(34)

(— )

05/2V84

1.55

0.07

1.09

0.58

3.29

(47)

(2)

(33)

(18)

(— )

06/08/84

1.99

0.33

3.53

0.19

6.04

(33)

(5)

(58)

(3)

(— )

06/22/84

1.91

0.72

8.09

1.14

0.01

11.87

(16)

(6)

(68)

(10)

(T)

07/03/84

3.22

1.22

9.35

0.31

0.07

14.17

(23)

(9)

(66)

(2)

(T)

07/19/84

1.12

0.74

3.34

0.37

0.01

5.58

(20)

(13)

(60)

(7)

(T)

07/31/84

1.93

1.78

5.78

1.42

0.05

10.96

(18)

(16)

(53)

(13)

(T)

104

Table J3. Mean zooplankton densities (#/l)and percents (in

parentheses) estimated from 0-30 m vertical tows during 1983 in the Rexford area of Libby Reservoir.

Date

EJaphnia

Bosmina

Cyclops

Diaptomos

Epischura

Total

08/17/83

0.48

0.11

1.24

0.81

0.03

2.67

/TON

(18)

(4)

(46)

(30)

(1)

09/07/83

0.75

0.07

1.90

1.91

T

4.63

/I c\

(16)

(2)

(41)

/ AT \

(41)

(T)

09/21/83

1.31

0.03

5.34

5.90

0.01

12.58

(10)

(4Z)

f A'1\

(4/)

IT)

10/06/83

0.70

0.03

2.01

2.26

5.0

(14)

(1)

f A(\\

(4U)

(4d)

( )

10/19/83

1.02

0.01

2.39

2.86

6.28

(16)

(T)

(38)

(46)

(-)

11/02/83

0.58

0.01

2.13

1.95

0.01

4.68

(12)

(T)

(46)

(42)

(T)

12/08/83

0.55

0.01

2.56

0.80

0.04

3.96

(14)

(65)

(20)

(1)

105

Table J4. Mean zooplankton densities (#/l)and percents (in

parentheses) estimated from 0-30 m vertical tows during 1984 in the Rexford area of Libby Reservoir.

Date

Daphnia

Bosmina

Cyclops

Diaptoraus

Epischura

Total

01/09/84

2.13

0.09

4.11

2.49

0.01

8.82

(24)

(1)

(47)

(28)

(T)

02/02/84

2.50

0.06

3.36

2.09

8.01

(31)

(1)

(42)

(26)

03/07/84

0.98

0.04

4.00

1.19

6.21

(16)

(1)

(64)

(19)

04/05/84

1.82

0.01

6.62

1.64

10.09

, . ...

(18)

(T)

(66)

(16)

04/27/84

2.07

0.07

5.58

0.74

8.46

(24)

(1)

(66)

(9)

f - J

05/10/84

3.50

0.32

12.15

2.09

18.06

(18)

(2)

(67)

(12)

05/23/84

3.92

0.12

9.51

1.31

,_

14.80

(26)

(1)

(64)

(9)

(— )

06/06/84

2.80

1.49

8.74

0.35

13.35

(21)

(11)

(65)

(3)

(— )

06/22/84

2.09

0.80

7.01

1.35

11.25

(19)

(7)

(62)

(12)

( )

07/03/84

2.04

0.94

7.38

0.51

0.01

10.88

(19)

(9)

(68)

(5)

(T)

07/19/84

2.34

0.94

6.12

1.16

0.01

10.56

(22)

(9)

(58)

(11)

(T)

08/01/84

1.93

1.08

6.97

1.35

0.06

11.39

(17)

(9)

(61)

(12)

(1)

106

Table J5. Mean zcx)plankton densities (#/l)and per cents (in

parentheses) estimted from 0-30 m vertical tows during 1983 in the Canada area of Libby Reservoir.

Date

Daphnia

Bosmina

Cyclops

Diaptoimis

Epischura

Total

08/18/83

5.40

7,23

4.33

11.96

(32)

(— )

(43)

(25)

^-r,, -' (— )

09/08/83

2.64

0.08

3.23

4.92

T

10.87

(24)

(1)

(30)

/ A C \

(45)

(~)

09/22/83

2.97

0.09

3.28

4.09

0.04

10.47

(28)

(1)

(31)

(39)

(T)

10/07/83

4.64

0.16

4.85

6.13

0.01

15.78

(29)

(1)

(31)

(39)

10/20/83

2.52

0.03

3.64

4.03

10.22

(25)

(T)

(36)

(39)

(— )

11/03/83

11.17

0.25

7.89

8.03

27.34

(41)

(1)

(29)

(29)

(-)

107

Table J6. Mean zooplankton densities (#/l)and per cents (in

parentheses) estiitiated from 0-30 m vertical tows during 1984 in the Canada area of Libby Reservoir.

Date Daphnia Bosmina Cyclops Diaptoirus Epischura Total

07/05/84

4.94

0.64

5.00

2.67

13.24

(37)

(5)

(38)

(20)

(— )

07/20/84

4.76

0.02

11.34

2.59

0.03

18.42

(25)

(62)

(14)

(T)

08/02/84

5.00

0.40

2.83

0.67

0.01

8.9

(56)

(4)

(32)

(8)

(T)

108

APPENDIX K

Average seasonal catch of macroinvertebrates by order in near-shore and limnetic tows on the surface of Libby Reservoir during 1983 and 1984

1

l^ble Kl. Surface macroinvertebrate densities and bionrass by Order during the suitsner 1983.

TEmiLE EEXEQBD CANADA

N.S. L Combined N.S. L Combined N.S. L Combined

(# tows = 14) (# tows = 10) (ft tows = 8)

Terrestrial:

Hynenoptera 43 428 235 3 24 14 4 4 4

Pscoptera ^ 5 17 11 3 20 12 - 8 4

Orthoptera ~ 2 1 - 3 2

Hemiptera

Homoptera 17 12 15 7 - 3 4 13 8

Coleoptera 12 6 3 - 2 21 13 17

Lepidoptera Neuroptera

Other 17 6 11 7 11 9

TOTAL TERRESTRIAL 43 463 278 23 58 41 29 38 34

Aquatic:

Diptera 17 21 19 7 10 9 17 42 30

Tricoptera - 4 2

Ephemeroptera Other

TOTAL AQUATIC 17 21 19 7 10 9 17 45 32

GRAND TOTAL 110 484 297 30 68 49 46 84 65

Hymenoptera .238 1.712 .975 .018 .081 .049 .002 .008 .005

Pscoptera 0.008 0.019 .013 .003 .035 .019 .016 .008

Orthoptera 3.301 - 1.650 2.811 1.405

Hemiptera

HoiToptera 0.076 0.146 .111 .226 .113 .004 1.088 .546

Coleoptera 0.176 .09 .215 .108 .718 .297 .507

Lepidoptera Neuroptera

Other 0.640 0.042 .341 .023 .005 .014

TOTAL

TE3RRESTRIAL 4.373 1.91 3.141 .485 2.932 1.708 .724 1.409 1.066

Aquatic:

Diptera 0.053 0.125 .089 .003 .007 .005 1.018 1.012

Tricoptera .026 .013

Ephemeroptera Other

TOTAL AQUATIC 0.053 0.125 .089 .003 .007 .005 1.018 1.038 1.028

Parts

GRAND TOTAL 4.426 2.035 3.231 .488 2.939 1.714 1.742 1.447 2.109

109

T^ble K2. Surface macroinvertebrate densities and biomss by Order during the fall 1983.

n

N.S.

L

Combined

N.S.

L

Combined

N.S.

L Combined

(# tows =

16)

(# tows =

14)

(#

tows =

10)

Terrestrial:

Hymenoptera

4

2

3

2

20

10

15

I^coptera

2

y.z

2

2

1

Orthoptera

Hemiptera

2

8

5

■, . 2

1

17

T7

X /

Homoptera

4

2-

3

0

A

oic

^0

14

420

C

o

Coleoptera

2

4

3

in

11

20

10

15

Lepidoptera

3

2

Neuroptera

A

17

13

Other

4

4

4

7

17

12

3

•)

TOTAL TERRESTRIAL

18

22

20

19

64

42

483

AT

Aquatic:

Diptera

10

10

10

?

i'i " Xi

13

97

in

54

Tricoptera

z

1

^hemeroptera

Other (Plecoptera)

3

2

TOTAL AQUATIC

10

10

10

Q

1 Q

14

100

xu

GRAND TOTAL

28

32

30

OJ

56

583

Gcaos/ha

Terrestrial:

Hymenoptera

.013

.013

.013

.001

.0005

.026

1.374

.700

Pscoptera

.002

.005

.004

.003

.002

Orthoptera

Hemiptera

.009

.048

.028

.338

.169

.205

.935

.570

Homoptera

.0003

.006

.003

.002

.160

.080

.451

.035

.243

Coleoptera

.002

.012

.007

.124

.257

.190

.556

.162

.359

Lepidoptera

.019

.009

Neuroptera

Other

.034

.112

.073

.027

.137

o082

.004

.002

TOTAL

TE31RESTRIAL

.060

.196

.128

.153

.896

.53

1.261

2.506

1.883

Aquatic:

Diptera

.054

.004

.029

.027

.052

.040

.309

.047

.178

Tricoptera

.017

.009

Ephemeroptera

Other

'■...si-

.003

.001

TOTAL W3UATIC

.054

.004

.029

.312

Parts

GRAND TOTAL

.114

.200

.157

1.573

2.553

2.062

110

Terrestrial: Hymenoptera Pscoptera Orthoptera Hemiptera Homoptera Coleoptera Lepidoptera Neuroptera Other

TOTAL TERRESTRIAL

Aquatic: Diptera Tricoptera Et)hemeroptera Other

TOTAL AQUATIC GRAND TOTAL

Terrestrial: Hymenoptera Pscoptera Orthoptera Hemiptera Homoptera Coleoptera Lepidoptera Neuroptera Other TOTAL

TERRESTRIAL

Aquatic: Diptera Tricoptera E^hemeroptera Other

TOTAL AQUATIC

Parts GRAND TC)TAL

22

14

11 47

3 50

.056

.008

.057 .121 .005

19

11 49

22

22 71

.050

.002 .004 .060

.028 .144 .032

20

1 11 4

11 48

13

13 61

.053

.001 .006 .030

.043 .133 .019

.005 .032 .126 .176

.019 .151

111

Table K4. Surface macroinvertebrate densities

and biomass by Order during the

spring

Terrestrial: Hymenoptera Pscoptera Orthoptera Hemiptera Homoptera Coleoptera Lepidoptera Neuroptera Other

TOTAL TERRESTRIAL

Aquatic: Diptera Tricoptera E^hemeroptera Other

TOTAL AQUATIC GRAND TOTAL

Terrestrial: Hymenoptera Pscoptera Orthoptera Hemiptera Homoptera Coleoptera lepidoptera Neuroptera Other IDTAL

TERRESTRIAL

Aquatic:

Diptera

Tricoptera

E^Jhemeroptera Other

TOTAL AQUATIC

Parts GRAND TOTAL

N.S.

31

1 6 14

5 58

Combined ITs. ^'^^o^r^--, Caim

^ Combined N.S^ tTc

108

5

113 171

.199

.001 .011 .238 .842

.041

1.332

.468 .006 .474 1.806

(# tows = 26)

Combined

31

11

49

158

158 207

.140

.007 .004 .046

.036 .233

.602

.602 .835

31

1 4

12

.5

4

53

133 2

135

4

16

11

254 433

4

258

3

436

274 447

.169 .169

.003

.004 .007 .142 .421

.039 .783

.199 .017

.033 .401

.060 .080

.535 .003 .538 1.301 1.111

.012 .710

.025 1.482

6 14

344

3

347 361

.086

.108

.046 .240

.698 1.457 1.067

.019 1.096

1.562 1.336

112

I^ble K5. surface macroinvertebrate densities and biomass by Order during the sum^r

N.S.

Combined N.S.

.BEXEQBH.

CANADA

Combined N.S. L Combined

I*™bf;r/h^

Tferrestrial: Hyirenoptera Pscoptera Orthoptera Hemiptera Homoptera Coleoptera Lepidoptera Neuroptera Other

TOTAL TE3^RESTRIAL

Aquatic: Diptera Tricoptera Ephemeroptera Other

TOTAL AQUATIC GRAND TOTAL

Terrestrial: Hymenoptera .5 Pscoptera Orthoptera

Hemiptera .01 Homoptera .034 Coleoptera .879 Lepidoptera Neuroptera

Other .135 TOTAL

TERRESTRIAL 1.558

Aquatic:

Diptera .171 Tricoptera

Ephemeroptera .010 Other

TOTAL AQUATIC .181 Parts

GRAND TOTAL 1.739

(# tows = 18)

.269

tows = 12)

22

15

19

2

6

4

20

19

19

24

4

14

2

1

15

6

10

83

52

67

21

26

24

2

1

23

26

25

.06

78

92

25

9

17

22

6

14

6

8

7

28

8

18

47

14

30

6

3

4

9

3

6

143

51

97

25

17

21

25

17

21

168

68

118

/ i

r tows

- 12)

6

6

6

6

6

6

20

14

17

9

11

10

6

3

9

4

50

43

46

11

11

11

3

1.5

6

3

4

8

4

25

17

21

75

60

67

.385

.213 .007

.078 .001

.146 .004

.057 .073

.065

.009 .030 .093 .010

.01 .032 .485 .005

.011 .122 1.506 .008

.104 .051 .440 .009

.058 .086 .973 .008

.046 .015 .514

.015 .006 .234 .022

.031 .011 .374 .011

.027

.081

.090

.017

.054

.060

.030

.438

.998

1.957

.7

1.329

.692

.350

.522

.105

.138 .005

.258

.051

.155

.586 .017

.065 .004

.325 .01

.105

.143

.258

.051

.155

1.023

.069

.546

.543

1.141

2.215

.751

1.484

1.715

.419

1.068

113

. p I".

APPENDIX L

Initial modeling effort on the Libby Reservoir fishery by the United States Geological Survey

United States Department of the Interior

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water Resources Division ;: ; / .

301 South Park Avenue, Room 428 Federal Building, Drawer 10076 Helena, Montana 59626-0076

October 24, 1984

Bradley B. Shepard

Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife

and Parks - - ' -

Route 1, Box 1270

Libby, Montana 59923 . . - r.?:

Dear Brad:

Our proposal with your agency was to construct and test a computer model that describes the effect of reservoir drawdown on the trophic dynamics of Lake Koocanusa. During the first year (FY 84) of the modeling effort, our plan was to develop a preliminary model for Lake Koocanusa. This preliminary model was to be a coarse model by which the feasibility of continuing model develop- ment would be evaluated.

After review of literature that addresses ecological structure and function of reservoir ecosystems, Rodger Ferreira's original approach was to adapt either the CLEANER series of aquatic ecosystem models developed for the U.S. Environ- mental Protection Agency or the CE-QUAL water quality models developed at the U.S. Army Engineers Waterways Experiment Station- However, because of the numerous literature-derived variable coefficients and large amounts of data required for these and similar models, Rodger was advised against their use. Determining cause and effect relationships would be difficult because of the large number of coefficients; the coefficients might not even be applicable to Lake Koocanusa. At a meeting, March 6, 1984, at which you, Steve McMullen, Rodger Ferreira, and Jim LaBaugh of the U.S. Geological Survey were present, development of a simplified model of reservoir drawdown and carrying capacity of fish was decided as the best approach. If this effort indicated a relationship between reservoir drawdown and fish biomass, the U.S. Geological Survey was to continue model development of the trophic dynamics of Lake Koocanusa.

Analysis of fisheries data from Lake Koocanusa showed no strong correlation between annual reservoir drawdown and catch as an estimate of fish carrying capacity. A regression of reservoir drawdown with catch of rainbow trout per net-night during autumn at the Rexford site (fig. 1) had a coefficient of determination (r^) equal to .087 and was not significant (p>F = .477) (table 1). At the Cripple Horse site a regression of the same variables (fig. 2) also showed a poor correlation (r^ = .013; p>F = .791) (table 2).

114

Page 2

The first year of reservoir growth of rainbow trout by migration class was also regressed against annual reservoir drawdown (figs. 3, A, and 5). These regressions were not significant, p>.05, and explained little variation in the amount of first year reservoir growth (tables 3, 4, and 5). However, there is "hint" of an inverse relationship (fig. 4) which describes an increase in the first-year reservoir-growth of migration class 1 with decreasing reservoir drawdown (r^ = .335; p>.05 = .080). Perhaps additional data would better define this relationship. Log transformations of the fish growth data and the catch data did not improve any of the regressions.

Regression analysis indicated a relatively strong relationship (fig. 6, table 6) between increasing condition factor of rainbow trout and increasing reser- voir drawdown. This relationship is significant (p<.05) with 82 percent of the variation in fish condition described; however, this trend was not expected based on our theoretical understanding of the effects of reservoir drawdown. The increase in "robustness" of fish netted during the fall could be the result of greater reservoir surface-elevation recovery in the summer and fall following a relatively deep reservoir-drawdown. Or it could be the result of relatively few fish, compared to the amount of food available, being able to take advantage of the increased density of food organisms concentrated by deeper reservoir drawdown.

The basic logistic equation of population growth on a yearly time step was used to model" changes in population growth, as represented by the catch data in response to carrying capacity as represented by reservoir drawdown. However the regression relationship between fish catch at Rexford and reservoir drawdowii with an equal to .087 was used to force the "model" to match the observed data. Consequently, the "model" had no meaning with respect to understanding how reservoir drawdown was related to changes in fish population or could be used to predict these changes.

Based on fisheries data that we have at the present time, it appears unlikely that a model could be developed to simulate the effect of reservoir drawdown on fish production of the reservoir. Lack of a strong correlation could result from several reasons: 1) The fish data represent fish populations that exist soon after reservoir impoundment. Fish populations have been observed in other reservoirs to fluctuate sharply during the first five to ten years of impoundment until trophic equilibrium is reached. 2) Reservoir drawdown might not have varied enough to show a change in the size of the fish populations! Reservoir drawdown from one year to the next varied by no more than 20 feet during the first five years of impoundment. These years were most likely ^IVJ"^ ^.000^ t'^ophic instability. During the last four years of data, ly/y to 1982, reservoir drawdown from one year to the next varied from 12 feet to only 4 feet. These years most likely are a time of trophic equilibrium. 3) If major controlling factors on fish production occurs by changes in the food web, there may be a lag time before reservoir drawdown would show effects on fisheries production. It may be that the only ways to distinguish the effects of reservoir drawdown might be to draw the reservoir down to the same elevation for several years in a row to allow a new trophic equilibrium to be reached. 4 Other factors affecting observed fish production in the reservoir could result from changes that occur in tributary streams. A change in water quality or quantity of the streams could affect fish spawning or juvenile growth and therefore recruitment to the lake. juveuixe

Because many other factors could be complicating a direct effect of reservoir drawdown on fish production, a model that incorporates severfrinput factors

115

Page 3

might be used to indicate various channels of indirect effects. Attached is a flow chart for a proposed model that incorporates changes in the food organisms of fish. Major changes include the availability of benthic invertebrates, terrestrial insects, and zooplankton. Each of these food organisms are theoretically affected by reservoir drawdown in the model (fig. 7). The changes in zooplankton are controlled through changes in primary production as estimated through regression models proposed by Woods and Falter (1982). Changes in the thermal structure and mixing stability, which are factors affecting primary productivity in Lake Koocanusa, will be driven in the lake model by use of a thermal model developed by Adams (1974). Change in the number of fish with time is controlled by a self-regenerating fish stock routine that, by default, will use historical rates of fish growth and mortality The rates of growth and mortality are adjusted by specified amounts depending on how the biomass of fish predicted by available food energy compares to the biomass of fish predicted by the self-regenerating fish stock model. Determining by what amount growth rates and mortality rates will be adjusted will be determined as part of the calibration process of the model.

Model output will be on an annual basis, however, changes in the fish popula- tion will be calculated on a seasonal basis, starting with spring. Using seasons will allow simulation of changes in food organisms as affected by reservoir drawdown.

Input driving variables for the model would include:

1) Reservoir elevation change per season (ft)

2) Mean solar radiation per season (cal/cm^/min)

3) Water temperature of inflow and outflow ( °C)

4) Volume of inflow and outflow (Ac. ft)

Input state variables for the model include:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Initial number of juvenile fish in tributaries Historic growth rates of fish in tributaries and Lake Koocanusa Historic mortality rates of fish in tributaries and Lake Koocanusa Fishing rate in Lake Koocanusa

Recruitment coefficients, a and b, of spawning fish Initial temperature profile of Lake Koocanusa (°C) Initial surface water elevation of Lake Koocanusa (ft) Season of spawning and emigration Number of migration classes of fish

Percentage distribution of fish among migration classes

Age of migration for each migration class

Total number of fish in reservoir during intitial year

Light restrictions and water density controls for zooplankton

Water temperature controls for fish

Driving variables incorporated as block data in the model:

1) Mean quarterly number of terrestrial insects per m2

2) Mean quarterly number of benthic invertebrates per m2 at each of three sampling areas

3) Mean quarterly euphotic zone depth (ft)

4) Mean quarterly euphotic zone dissolved solids concentrations (rag/L)

5) Mean quarterly surface illumination (foot candles)

6) Mean quarterly percent growth of fish resulting from zooplankton, phytoplankton, and terrestrial insects

116

Page 4

All organism counts or biomass values will be converted to units of energy (kilocalories) for internal calculations of energy flow in the model. Details will need to be worked out for reservoir elevation changes as related to inflow and outflow volumes. Either inflow and outflow volumes will be specified by the user and a resultant reservoir elevation change calculated or the reservoir elevation change can be specified and outflow volume adjusted to correspond with inflow volumes.

Model output variables will include:

1) Cohort population size for each cohort by year

2) Length of individuals in each fish cohort by migration class and year (mm)

3) Weight of individuals in each fish cohort by migration class and year (gm) A) Total spawning biomass per year (gm)

5) Recruitment number of fish to the reservoir each year

6) Total catch of fish each year (gm)

Development of the model will continue through FY 1985 and 1986. Output from the model during development will be analyzed to determine the most important factors that affect the production of fish. This analysis will be accomplished through calibration checks with actual data and sensitivity tests. If output from the model is determined not to represent changes resulting from actual occurrences of important factors in the system, new directions in modeling or sampling will be considered. If new directions in modeling or sampling are not feasible, the model will not be developed any further. If new directions in sampling are feasible, or if output from the model is determined to represent changes resulting from actual occurrences of important factors in the system, the model will be developed further and refined with each successive year of sampling.

The feasiblity of adapting the model to Hungry Horse Reservoir will be determined in early 1986. If the model is appropriate, it will be applied to Hungry Horse Reservoir and further refined during 1986.

During model development, the Montana District will receive assistance from James LaBaugh (GS-13 Hydrologist-Limonology) , who will act as advisor to the project. Jim is familiar with lake and ecosystem modeling as part of his work in the Lake Hydrology Group of the Office of the Regional Research Hydrologist, Central Region.

Project Products and Reports;

Model output will be in the form of a computer printout. A progress report describing model development will be published as a U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report at the end of FY 1985. At the end of FY 1986, a final report describing the model and the trophic dynamics of each reservoir will be published in a referred scientific journal.

117

Funding :

Page 5

The total cost of the project in FY 85 which includes programming the proposed flow chart, running calibration checks, and conducting sensitivity analysis, is $56,200. Funding can be adjusted to comply with the dates of your operating fiscal year. The project will be funded as a cooperative program with the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks. Because data collected by your agency from Lake Koocanusa and Hungry Horse Reservoir is used for the modeling project, a portion of the the cost is included as direct services. Therefore cost to the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks is $22,500. Funding for the federal side of the costs are provided through the Merit Fund program of the U.S. Geological Survey.

Proposed Funding Arrangements for FY 85;

Montana Dept. of Fish, Wildlife

U.S. Geological Survey and Parks TOTAL

Matching Funds Matching Funds Direct Services

$28,100 $22,500 $5,600 $56,200

A breakdown of the total costs for model development of Lake Koocanusa durine FY 85 is as follows: ^

Employee Cost (Salary and Benefits);

Rodger F. Ferreira, GS-12, Hydrologist (Biology) James W. LaBaugh, GS-13, Hydrologist (Limnologist ) - Gary W. Rogers, GS-12, Computer Specialist

Travel Expenses:

Transportation:

Kalispell (2 trips)

GSA Vehicle: 1 month Q $131 /month

800 miles @ $0.17/mile

Denver (3 trips)

Airfare: 3 trips @ $440 trip Per Diem: Rodger F. Ferreira, 21 days Q $75/day

Computer Operation and Maintenance;

Prime System Operation costs. 6 months @ $300/month Maintenance: 6 months @ $100/month

Model and Data Storage, Tape backup: 10 months @ $15/month Computer operator costs: 10 months @ $15/month Computer Supplies

Direct Services

TOTAL

$37,390

7,170 $44,560

$ 130

140

1,320 1 ,580 $3,170

$1,800 600 150 150 170

$2,870

$5,600 $56,200

Sincerely,

George M. Pike District Chief

Enclosures

118

CITED REFERENCES t'' ^

Adams, D. B. , 1974, A predictive mathematical model for the behavior of thermal stratification and water quality of Flaming Gorge Reservoir, Utah-Wyoming: Cambridge, Mass., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, unpublished Masters Thesis, 213 p.

Woods, P. F. , and Falter, C. M. , 1982, Limnological investigations: Lake

Koocanusa, Montana, Part 4: Factors controlling primary productivity: Hanover, New Hampshire, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Special Report 82-15, 106 p.

119

NUMKKK ()!• I'l Sll l^l^K NKT-Nl CUT

c

I I

o

^ CD

rt

O O

CX) cu 3

I— o n rt rD

cr

o

rt

Cl O

c

ftj rt OQ

rt

m

O

fD ft)

-1 0

< -o

O I—

n n

CL

03 n

s: ft)

CL 03

o

r'

03

?r

fD

O

o o

03

C

C13

D- C <-( H-

00

rt

> c n C

g

CO

Pd

<

O

M

?0

o

»

ri

O

s

120

C CJ

O o

d

OJ

u

o

ri)

C

Ui

•i-l

' (

Q.

M

( '

*>

<u

CO

Q

CU

OS

Q)

C2

r;

4J

4J

0)

o

4-J

CJ

\J

»> t>

CD

CNI

00

Q

\J

4—1

XJ

rrl

O

t ,

M

o

>— t

E

w

0

l_i M

•H

U

w

•H

B

4J

CT3

iJ

<

c

O

•H

4-1

M

m

60

OJ

C

•H

60

(U

3

DS 1

T3

i— t

H

o o

«0I

«

\rt|

-1

O

an

o;

or

o:

3 O

to to o

N

I

^ eo 00 f>. >- f"' o <>• rj

t- o o

I

I "O

CO o>

3

o

Ui o

lii » 4 z oe

a '-' p

iM»-r>iV-oo~*r>irMr>-»^f^ •-0»-pr>if«irMr>jr>irj«M

a "f

rj W- iA> K- fsi

to o >o p ^

It* >j

O D O I I

>j in

3 O »

r> to

to -o

M lA

rs.

CO

«> •*

M

r>-

O}

p. O

0

tNi 00

■0

00

t\l

9. 0

0

0

r- «0

rvi 0

0

k- 1

ISI

1

eo -

« lo

*r> ^ F- O f*^ Bn m IN* -o D *o ^ 00 00000-0 o

^ V- 00 ko to O m FM r\j

«t >ri O O- O

^ *r» 10 O o fM 00 'O w ••••••

^ <r >#

o b o 000 o D o o p o o D o

O D O O ir\

00 p >r

O o O o 000

D O O

000

Bo o O v>

►* -o

.1. . .

Lo (/^ lA

O O

O O

o o

o o

o o

o o

O FO

r

o;«- o o

0|— o o o o O IfO O O |~» o

O ^ O

o k) o o .0

O K% O %1 *M «0

O !o O O ]IM »-

O O lo

r

121

o

H

M

o >

M

to

o 2

4-1

D

ID

00

■H

'O

<u

3

tiJ

O

0

Ui

0)

M

«J

T

c

•in

•> >

w

Ui

•H

3

,—1

tfl

»u

CXi

l_J

rrl

w

u

1.1

o

0)

U)

(U

•-i

ex

CO

•H

3

u

C

C

CO

x:

4J

4-1

(A

c

U

•H

CO

CO

bO

4-)

CO

3

0

'O

l-i

OJ

4J

4-1

o

0

a

c

■H

CN

03

CO

r- (

0

0

4-t

o

4.)

CO

u

I I

CM

<U

3 00 •H

1H0IN-X3N H3d HSId iO HaaWON 122

(1)

c

3

•H

O

3

<U

CO

l-i

trJ

T3

00

V-i

d

•H

•H

O

.H

>

U

e

dl

CO

tfl

W

QJ

)-i

QJ

U)

1— 1

U

CO

O

D

32

C

C

Cl>

(0

-H

D.

>^

•H

M

U

CO <r u

o

e

x: o

o

*-i

CO

O

c

e

u

o

<

u

0)

■H

X.

u

Cfi

•H

00

4-t

c

CO

•H

4-1

o

c

O

to

•H

in

c

CO

Ul

o

00

o

a;

o »

1

1

rsi

0)

rH

J3

CO

H

Oi

«oi

o

o

o

Ui

o

A

»

c

■K

is

&

o

X

u

lU

CO

3

o

-i

o

>

O CO

or r-

0O| 0|

O|oc

r|.u

CO o

0!IM

I I

cc oc

Ui O

O ^ O)'' CO O KtjtO s>

.-■Or-.-O-O-OOPJO-io O »-t^»-^.-OK>KlK» 00 -O

«DOoo'o<r-r^O»Ar>-4AO- 9>w^o•l/^0'K>^.m r-'o oo

.| . ,

t/\ -^t \*rs >t trt 'Sf tA lA t/\ <^

CO »

o -* 00

|0 <M O 00

o

»- o

O rvi tf^ 1^ fsi

-O »- i«0 »- O m to

<\t t- o o

'<M CM <V »-

<NI O O

O r-

fNieoraoo^r-rvjrs. |»»0>*|0iri"0i0 t>- mU»iM

i-OOO'OOO'NifO^MfOT-KI^

i50 0ooot^f^l«-fl00jirioo r..ON--ov-(Ni-^ ir\ LTV o <o

'•O 00 O '<n OO r- ITS. Kl 00 |-0 W% ~# i/^ ~f iy%cO'OaOf^'(^^

tU

a- O

7

-o

>

IQC

u

;Ui

_l

o

f~ o

,UJ

O

]<n

lo

>

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

O ■O »- r.

-* <NJ to

O O O :o o

o o o o o

o o o o o

o o o o o

o o o o c>

o o o o o

O r- 00 O

o »- o ir*

»A ^ fO rsj

' « « «

1

»# 00

•o <>•

o

csi

rsj */>

<o i-O

»- N. O

«^ 1

z

»-

■r- ^

O

00 O ~f

M

»-

T- O. OO

«—

ro ,0

1

■O K>

-o K> r-

1- o-

Kl (M

»

5t

O O

O |0 u->

00 o

CM »r«jr-

2; !

in

fin

"* i**

r- 9- <0

00 t

•O <M

lU

OC

o

r- ~r

•-.^ rj

imI-o

»- fo|%»

i

QC

~r

X

»^

csl T-

f\»l«- fx

rsi cM|fM

CM 1

O

■o

o

1

OC

X

•o

-i

i

oc

UJ

STI

00

o

1

1 1

o

LU

<m;o

*-

i

]

~t O r-

t/> O CM

^ o ^^ O o o-

CM O CM in O CM

O

o «-

OO o ■* t r-

M !•«

|5

!r

2- f—i

a

UJ

CM -O

^ o

1/)

-i

-i

««

t

'-I

-)

Ui

o

o

,<x

or

*/l

o

lU

4/1

a

oc

-J

o

«

o

O

«-•

»- j^t

z

Q

oc

QC

o

•4

■a

Z>

1- lUi

Ui

o

a

or

i

1

a

u

U-

z

O

O

O

<□

r

X

Z

Ui <5C

ct

3

13

Oi M

Z>

«/>

\^

0.|U.

Q

123

Q

o >

U CO

i-i

»^

CO

(0

I—

rH lu

O

0

0)

hJ

C

•H

O

(0

(fl

CO

•H

r 1

C

o

"

4-i

<0

Ui

oo

•H

e

B

o

fr

4-1

3

o

)-l

0

c

•H

<0

1-1

O

►> »>

Q

x:

•> *>

CO

o

>_j

M

Ui

•H

O

0

>

>

OJ

'JD

'Ti

(U

(U

)-i

i*-t

CO

o

u

nj

■V

QJ

>^

1-1

X

4-J

■J)

•H

U

CO

•H

OC

CO

1

I

m

a; u

SHHl-lNl'rilK Nl 124

HIM OHO

o o o o o o

CO

u

00 •H

e

e o

M

*4-( 4-1

3

o u iJ

o

•H

td d I-" 5 o

«4-i t3

o

CO

x: u

4-1

o u

00 o I

>

•H O >

u

(U

M rH

QJ CO

1-1 3 C

l-i c

CO <0

>> >. I XI

4-1

CO HD

M 01

•H 4J

>4-i a

•H

o

U-l

I

!3

u

•H

CO

4-1

t/l

CO

■r-t

4-)

D

to

4-1

CO

cn

OC

o

o

•H

CU

a

'/)

o

u

GO

_j

QJ

c

03

Qi 1 1

•H

ar <

>

ro

z

(U

UJ

a

m

XI

a

t—

O

SI

T 1

ol

X V-

o o o o o

o

It ^1

O

QC It-

O |4

Of

O « X <UJ 1^ U IXi

o r

INI

-o o- ^ >o o

■o -J- o o

(Nl XX}

O iKl

O

o o

o ro

o o

uo in

O O

i/. o

,o X

Ui O

o. u.

4^ UJ

lUJ O is u.

lO

I3

-o fv. 00 u>

o

u^ o in

I <M OO I »r> (M « I v\ O I ru IN/

*0 K> fNI

OO o >rs «M irv O o- CO «- L/^ o o *— •r\ <>■ j<» lA m f\j ^ 00 1^ O O- »r> O m ^ * I * * O ■<)

o

o o

r*. l/^

O O fM

O O INI CO

<Ni o

'O INI

-o o -o

T

pj o

«a o> «o

l> INI o-

o- rg o-

»- T-

rg IN

^- O N.

O OO o

r-. >f r«. fM

fM >A «rt

fv f>. o «Ni

Irx tn O It- 'O

r>- KN ^ ko tr*

o> (M K r<(

-t to

OO «Ni o

<>■ O O

UI OO

irt «0 'O

o

tn »-

DO a

K Kl f>J

ft -o \ri

O Kt O |»r in o- p»- o in o w> ■« m o rvj -J m

r^fNjfoOu> ^ O -r- ^ oo«— |r-OOI/>^OOtr»

Ft''

IN»

fsi trO O r- ■O «\J K> UN •O no

O ro

I

ir\ K> o o K> O o h# «— r\j UN O INI f-^ on

-o O O- K> ^

^oo>i|0<>Oir>«-

[^v-OQ'U-vr^rv.Qo >^»-oooooo

ooooopooo oopoooooo

OODOOOOOO

oopoopooo

OODOODOOC-)

oooooooota oODC'Or-iooo ooooopooo

roK>iNifoi^ -orvjorw-j

|NJfMOr-0»-00^D

r'--r-'-r-'-

t/1

o

O

<✓!

cx

>-

IX

_J

UJ

-I

1

O

«I

»-

»✓»

—1

^

*I

<J

_J

-r

.ID

:d

UJ

n

o

or

»-<

IX

u^

1^

O

Uj

i_J

1/^ r.

rv

o

o

-J

>-

o

111

*i o

n

i<n

3 UJ

-o

z

O (X

rt

o

l-H -I

'i

iJI

¥~

Uj

O

OJ p

( »

<l

•«

Z

or ^

*/l

01

o

1/1

u. u

u

z

-<

o o

O

l/l

y-

1

*/l

tn

r X

X

<U

or

or

z

or

o

a.

U-

O

»-

fx

UJ

o

125

o

o

u. o

»—

o

!!

:• o >♦ t«-

II .1

!l

I I

'I tfs

* o

I I I I I

.1 »- I I I I

I <n

■♦ m

I

I

I

»

I

I o

I

,1 kr>

W 2

O Q

a

I— I o > OS w

CO

<0 (0 3 C «0

o o o

c

•H

£3 O •H U CO U 00 •H

e

e o u

u

o

5

o

c

•H

CO

0

o

4-1

CO

o

u

u

Ui

u

•H

•H

0

o

>

>

u

(U

tn

(A

(U

V-i

u

(0

o

c

c

CO

CO

>A

*-i

-n

t-l

'J3

■H

i-l

(0

•H

00

(0

01

1-1

3

126

m

(A CO

o

d o

•H

j

1

o

iu.

>

o

o

'■ A

O. X

o

o

•l

o

•*! *"

o

a

o

o

o

«

«0

]

CO u

W) •H E

B o

o c

c :5 o

O 5 CO

4J 'XJ

O )-i V-i -H

00 o

1 > u u

•H (U

0 cn

> OJ Ui 1-1

(U

W r-l

QJ CO i-i 3

c

>-j c CO CO di >^

1 X)

CO TJ U 0) •H U U-i o •H l-i TJ O OJ U-( (-1 Cl

(/)

a (f)

•H 03 tJ

'11 CO

•H 'J)

C iJ CO C/) U

o

c o

o >^

•H

cn OJ

:^

GO

0) c

CtJ -H I I

CO

OJ

fO O

-* iO

o

m ;o «- o

o ^

►1 f\J.

0|

'_J

.4

oc

y-

1

;o

1

>

1

1-

z

u

UJ

1

o

o

z

>UJ

UJ

o

<0(

1 a.

a

1^

(A

oc

■D

vu

o

o

CK

,o

o

O

1^

U.' 0|

X ui

oir

O |0

z

IO UJ

lu O X u.

»-« -J

o <

I

T— rvj r- rvj IT- ^ o t/^ CO i/A l'0 0>op»-'0f>.-*0rvir>

r- T- w~* K*. o ^ r'-or^0f>^-0-0fcr\ o O

fvj »M Ki <M K> Ki ;K< K>

<VJ «rt 0> CO (SJ IK1 <r- O m «0 l/>

o «r i-o o

^ o o

w^i lA o

O K1

O ^ ' r\j rNj r\i rsi

r>- o r> <vj

o O -O fv» O

-O »- O hi K> O.

■o p- o.

r- «0 m to O- OO

c^ o |h. «n O ^ *o ^

«A O O u-1 (D

o on T-

O (M

ty. .o

«- •* O 1- I »- I I

■O O ts.

I

■O -o o o o

to O CO

O O- O p-

y o o- o

J !•-'

<Ni rv r>j rg

O ^'^ r- «~« ^ O

Ki rg v-i o *- o rO

«- -J |0 rg

to »A o.

O ^ rg ^

m i/\ *r» »rv

. .| . .

t/^ tr* O -o

r- f\J f\i

r\j r\j *M fvj

O

O <i r-

O

O ;0 r- ,00

irn r\j

fvj <\j r\j

r\j r\j r\t

rg m

,o

o o

O O

O O O O

O O

O V.

UJ

o o

O D

O O O O

O.O

E

\r\

>

o o

O O

O O O O

O O

rg

lOr

o o

O D

O O O O

O O

o o

ju..

o o

O O

O O O O

O O

rg O

IvO

o o

O O

O O D O

O O

O Vvj

'<rt

>

o o

O O

O O O C>

O O

O O p O

^''^

\f\ o

OO ^

J i '

*— -o <i

O rj rg rg

<r- D rg rg

rg rg rg rg rg

i I

i I

rri o

»0 O

>r O 1^- o w-i O

T- O

O l> o

rg O

0;0- OiO- O-

O i/-

GO rg

«— ir» O- ^ O

OO w-\ rg O O •I ■O O rg C^ I O

or

O

Ql

Qt

_i

UJ

!z

1

o

<

>^

z

UJ

or

iZ

O

<UJ

UJ

o

or

o

_<

o

o o

O

I—

z

O a

ot

o

»-« <4

*t

QC

>-

UI

o

UJ O

O

41

O

«1

1^

QC jlO

or

io

1

u. 'u.

u.

z

o,o

O

|3

CO

z

lU

oc

or

|z

Of

a

A*.

o

1

'>

,<K

!✓>

(&

o

1

1 «

127

I 4

o :2

M

o >

w

o a (d

(0 3 C (0

o o o 1^

(0 •J

c

•H

CM

(0 (0 (0

c o

•H U

00

a o

u

5

o

C •H

CO

W4

O

:j

o

o

u

T)

QO

•H

•H

o

O

>

>

u

u

'J3

<u

l-i

u

—i

03

o

3

C

Ui

C

CO

OJ

>^

i-i

X

i-i

c

•H

U

CO

•H

oo

(0

I

in

128

<0| z

0 <

01 ui

f-- «M

o o o o o o a

■o ;

Ol

5

o

c

•H

CO

d

)-i

:^

o

O

:3

CO

M

0

U

u

•H

Ofl

O

1

>

V-i

•H

0)

o

CO

>

(U

tH

CO

l-l

3

1-1

d

03

(0

1

u

m

u

(U

•H

4-1

O

•H

U

T3

o

01

U

Cl

a

•H

(0

U

(/)

CO

•H

U)

U

D

C

4-J

CO

O

o

r-

o

o

•H

'/)

01

'/I

01

CO

Ui

GO

d

1

•H

1

lO

OJ

—1

o o

I"-

o o

b o o o o o p

rO :

O ' Ofi ^ O I

Oil

O r- O O

O PO

' r-

M

<

CL

>

i

o

Z

i

Ui

UJ

»-

O

iuJ

i

>-)

:c

-1 ,

Of

Ui

UJ

lac

ui :

O

€Jt

QC

a.

ID

Q

Of

or

o

O

o

O

.•^

i:

1_)

O

: z

M -a

«/\ Ui

'■oc tt uj O

z

J o

°

Ui

CO O iTt rg

Kl ^

l-c

o

tn

oc

X.

vrt (CO

QC

Ui

ST

O >i-

1

O

lii

1

»-

*/>

1

I

;1U

O ~*

T\i

P

*t

O O

CM

;>

UJ

1

r- O

oc

U. T- .

or)

O

u

-1

fj

o rj

►/I

o io

ro

>

O

■J o

i

I

fs«^»Ni(»»'Oor>w>^.Ki^C>r 0>rOKro>-|«o>/>oo^r^.

c>-r^or--if\-o«oooor-

«o oo

•7- \n ^ O « w-< ;^ rsi ooiaooo«oao«Oaococo

Al >f fVJ 'O ^ K> ^ ^ O- -O O So OO

N

^ to

Kl m

m O

irt rx o <>•

«0 O 00 V-

t>- oo m o r»- r- ^

vr> •» O ,0 «»

00 r». r- ■«- O

o- o> lA r<. i>i jm ^ ■—

00 IIM C -

tf^ >0 'O

r>. o> p ^ _ «^ «^

SO <M

)> o o m K> o

«CJ (T

O »- »

KirMO»-f»-'0-0|K>

op^or«"0<Mk>

<MinOw-vO-*-00

n m K

K> 1^ KV

nu -o r<i

0 O O |o »» O

K> 9- >0 r\i «» «vj O

1

.*- o h-.

I

«» tr* »- |0 r- t

IN IO <M t». O -O O BO Kl o r\i O ^ to O ^ •» O ITM «M lO Kl

f\j rs* po *A t>

in ru o s# M Kl

O tn O oo o fO in

m Kl ru o

rg I

CM L— I

o o~

O O kn m

o Kl o 00 K o l-o o o »»>

O Irvi o Kl »- ^ O k> O o oo m o U- o oo ^ e> Oht o ~r 00

O -J I 00

O Oi

t

^.

O O D o o o

OOP

O o o o o o o o o

O O CI OOP

o o ex O

O O O O

O O D O

O O o O

O O D O

o o o o o o o o o O D o

o o o o o o o o o o

O D

o o o n

rsj r«. D

m ro

o NO CO

m -o ai

»/i

or

o

nr

>-

or

-J

UJ

«»

Z

1

o

««

*-*

*/>

i/i

f-

»✓>

'-/

-1

<J

■«a

<4

-J

I

,3

■n

Ui

»-

Cj

o

a

OL

z

Kn

m

o

lii

«j

1>-I I3f

oc

o

Q

_/

o

Q

UJ

« O

o

1/1

3 UI

4

Z

o <^

ti

»n

o

*~* ^

•J

<JC

tn

»-

UJ

o

Ui CI

«f

ra

-1

Z

u *rt

<n

or

tn

O

1

t/l

u u

u.

z

-<

o o

o

tn

t-

l-M

1

tn

>n

K be

X

UJ

DC

QC

Z

3 P

or

o

in *y\

in

Ck.

u.

Q

1

OC

c/1

Ed

O

«

129

oi

o

X' Ol

O I t- I

.A I

Q

o > a:

Ui

0)

o

.H

a

00

ON

•CT>

c

C •H

y*

3

cn

3 <-•

CO o o o

01

-J

fs fv. f- r- f>. r- ^- 41 -o o o o 4* <> o 4i o ^/^ *o

f-^ /-^ fi' » f \ »^ pry p*-\ »*^ ^ ^ ^ "O ^ t #0 r-^ f*.

c

•H

c

3

0

0

(-1

TD

u

:5

0

c

•H

•H

m

0

u

>

Ui

0

)->

1-1

0

4-1

0

3

U-i

0

•H

«-i

iJ

•H

T)

•H

C

0

QO

u 1

1

vO

'"J

u

MC).I.:>V".I No 1.1. lU.MK)

130

<

x:

4-1

d

•H 1-1

w

r* \~-t

03

o

O

O

I ^

C

•H

4-1

O

c

u

:5

4-1

o

0

CO

c

•H

CO

)-i

•H

O

<+-(

>

O

U

(U

u

03

o

OJ

4->

V-i

a

nl

-H

>+-(

CO

3

d

C

o

C

•H

CO

4J

■H

-o

c

o

o

(U

4-1

a

o

■H

TD

0)

o

•H

iJ

CO

CO

•H

tJ

CM

03

00

■u

Ifi

C

o

O

•H

03

-<r

«

GJ

U

00

1

o

1

J3

1 1

1 1

1

i

o '

1

1

Q

Q

o

o

1

t

m

oc

1

o

a.

o

z

o

1

!

*^

\ 1

lu

1

o,

j

«

fM

1

>

!■«

o

o-

i

U.

l<3

i

1 1

oe

o

-o

o

»^

■o

o

1

■o

.u.

o

UJ

CO

rj

o

1 A

O

z

:«#

o.

O

>-

at

»-

■o

o

o

o

o

i

f>.

o

-i

u.

(✓>

r-

»/>

UJ

•o

O

>/>

o

£jr

•o

r'.

o

o

««

•o

lA

■o

r-

1

o

■o

rvi

«o

Ui

»/>

oo

o

-J

o

^

u.

o

o

r

O ]<

>r CO

</\ ;0 O (O <M|0

•-io

o rs) o o

u. |t

»- rvj ^ Ml r--t O

Ui O

a u.

<o

<»■ o o

■o o

o ■»

to «M

o- p> o o-

o o

O ~J

O r-

O oo

o o O rj

f»- O -J CO CO -O

«0 */>

m *M u~\ o

fM ^ O

•o r>- o

<0 O'

■* r~

»»

Kl

CO

O f\i

IU

■O NO

rO

CO

^ -*

r-

to

CO

>o

tn

»— »/> o

X

4

r- O

«-

O

<M

fo

00

f-

w-\ o- O

UJ

w> <o

o

•o

<M

f<- -J CO

iO-

z

-* O

--r

o

00

o

o

«r>

<>■ f>- >o

00 O

CO

o

o

m

K%

'oc

ex

Kl O

K>

o

r\j

>r

<M

O <\J -o

iU

o

u.

■O f>-

>o

o

K>

u\

Kl

o

<o Ul CO K> k/\ ■O »- CO K> ^ ^ •- |0 Kl

•o r\t o- K p >o 00 k/^ . .1. . o p o *

^ i/> 00

oo

^ l/^ CO

to »-

fv o Kl O

-O O O-

cn ru

rvi Kl ^ O

lf\J O ^ CO

o T-

(O fVI

o o o o

00

t- tr\

Kl

LA

-o

o *-

CO

O

UI

K)

I-

oo

o kr>

r- rv"

Kl

D

-O

-o

00

sj-1 V-

o

■O

on

K>

u-« O

o

■o r-

oo

««

(NJ

K>

Kl l>

in

(M >0

1^

>

fM

O

fM

-o

O Kl

Kl

o o

c

IM

rvi

o

>f O

<M

CO O

Kl

•O

IV.

ir»

fv.

-t -O

T

vt U\

VA

K>

K>

Kl

f

K>

r-~i Kl

Kl

Kl K>

Kl

o

D

O

o

o

o o

o

o

O

o

o

Q

o

o

o

o

cr»

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

D O

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

r.i

o

vf

o

m

o

-o

lA

lA

■J

Kl

K'

Kl

Kl

K*

Kl

Kl

Kl

rviKi.jtn-or^oo(>o«—

o K> o o Kl O Kl o O r- rK O Kl o K> o O |oO O CO ^ IM O O O -O >>. fv.

O AJ O Kl O O O *A

o. o o

rsi o IO D

Kl . O •*

z o

ID 3 UJ lO o |ac

•✓I i/i O

O *- O O -I =3

UJ Z

or 1/^ ; o

4 »-• U i/>

tJ K UJ »-

O «1 O 4

WO I- Ot X

«/i O 1

u z

O ^ IH

l/> (Tl

X UJ a OC

^ a. u- o

131

Figure 7.— Proposed flow chart for ecosystem model of Lake Koocanusa

a)

START

I

I

I

Tit

HO

kit

4

Coliorf

Output

fitter-

ST'O P

^ecruihCT)^

\

recrulU

■for 4JI u\t\orts

■hr ^It < //» J"

'.0 ho rf^

5a««i

t)/o*»»«S T*'' Alt

132

A

Enitr

Artier So lar

i'l^rffnc^ Area J

i

f>riff{/t fff 1^.

2 -fDv

o^c -for

I

I

1

^ A^e -for

I

I

133

I

Ho

Z 9 F-hM

I

-fuh in tu*i-<.i^

recruits i-o

1

Of M -fW -jt/t* r*s^^\/oir In

■f/i(i m Res. /W-

i

oj^ (it e6.ck ,If ' Jfhrae Su^^l^

^;»>iA5S of Wrte^^ci

I

product I i^ih th ^

***** »^ heirmst.

I

\r€S'4l^i'tu /rem

I

I

Bn4t^ Ort ^ur/iicc

ma

1

i

I ccilcM/a-h. pff^anfj^

J

n,\roric

APPEM)IX M

Comments by Gene R. Ploskey, Aquatic Ecosystems Analysts, on the First Annual Report (1984) and proposed Work Plan (in prep.) for the study "Quantification of Libby Reservoir levels needed to maintain or enhance reservoir fisheries"

AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM ANALYSTS

POST OFFICE BOX 4188 FAYETTEVILLE. AR 72702

PHONE 501/442-3744

December 20, 1984

Brad Shepard

Montana Dept. Fish, Wildl., and Parks P. 0. Box 67

Kalispell, Montana 59903

Dear Brad,

On attached sheets you will find my comments concerning your work plan and first annual report on the Libby Reservoir project. You obviously have put a lot of thought and effort into the project, which is one of the more comprehensive sampling efforts I have seen in recent years. The results should contribute signifi- cantly to our understanding of the ecology of cold-water reser- voirs in the U.S. Time constraints forced me to restrict comment to perceived problem areas. I hope my thoughts are of some use to you.

Merry Christmas,

Gene R. Ploskey

136

Work Plan

Page A (top) I agree that changes in living space associated with water-level fluctuations may limit fish-food resources and produc- tion, but negative impacts are most pronounced when drawdown occurs during the growing season. Impacts in winter are usually moderated by low water temperatures that reduce primary production, food requirements, growth, and predation. Primary and secondary produc- tivity would be low regardless of water levels, I can visualize protracted negative impacts of winter drawdown on benthos produc- tion because overwintering populations in the fluctuation zone are decimated annually and reproduction and recolonizat ion would require several months during the following spring and summer. Algae and zooplankton production typically is minimal in winter, and therefore unlikely to be limited by drawdown, unless the draw- down occurs during spring, summer, or fall. The highly seasonal nature of zooplankton and phytoplankton production, and dessication resistant overwintering mechanisms in the former group (e,g,, ephipial eggs) make protracted damage unlikely.

Pages 5-21 I have no problem with your sampling efforts as you seem to have adequately covered all important variables. Your efforts on food habits, zooplankton, and benthos are good and will be indispensib le for defining trophic relations.

Page 21 (objective 5) I have serious reservations about using habitat suitability models to assess impacts of water-level fluctuations, A loss of habitat to drawdown (especially in winter) rarely causes a proportional reduction in fish abundance. Habitat suitability models have been most criticized because habitat units rarely can be correlated with density or standing crop, A better approach to assessing impact of winter drawdown might be to compare size- specific mortality of fish or abundance among seasons. If mortality is substantially higher during winter drawdown than in summer, some basis exists for implicating drawdown as a detrimental

^ agent. Most literature indicates that fish metabolism, consump- tion, and growth drops substantially in winter, although stomach contents may not decrease due to reduced food processing rates, i,e,, a -food item may require days to digest. Due to reduced food needs, winter losses of invertebrate food resources and predation on young fishes should be less significant in winter. I have often found positive correlations between fish abundance and annual water-level fluctuation whereas habitat losses due to fluctuation might suggest that the effect would be distinctly negative. Until the mechanisms and effects are understood, relying on habitat changes to project population impacts could be misleading.

Page 24 (Revegetation) Vegetation in the upper fluctuation zone is very important for spawning and nursery habitat for certain species, especially in warm-water impoundments, California Biologists have had some successes along these lines see McCammon and von Geldern (1979) in Predator-prey Systems In Fisheries Mgmt. (SFA Publ., Page 431), NAJFM 2(4): 307-315, and an excellent review

137

by Whitlow and Harris (1979). A copy of the review by Whitlow and Harris is enclosed.

Page 27 (Factorial Analysis of Variance) Statistically, a weak part of the study is that 3-4 years of replication probably will be inadequate to statistically quantify relations between reservoir operations and changes in populations of fish or fish-food biota. Seasonal and areal variations inmost variables usually exceed annual variations, especially when annual fluctuation regimes do not differ significantly from year to year. Consequently, you may , not be able to demonstrate significant differences among years unless you standardize the data by area and season and use these standardized deviates as replicates, I prefer to use one-way analysis of variance to look for differences among years, seasons, or areas because 3-way ANOVA's always yield many interactions that cannot be explained. If adequate replication is a problem because .„ samples from different areas are highly variable or have different variances, try standardizing all dimensions (years, seasons, or areas) except the one you want to test. You will want to use a nonparametr ic test such as the Kruskal-Wal 1 is test if sample variances are not homogeneous.

In my experience, the ability to predict reservoir-wide operational effects on fish requires at least 8-10 years of data unless you are lucky enough to sample fewer years under highly variable flow conditions.

The limited replication of hydrological cycles (4 years; 4 springs; 4 summers, etc.) should not prevent the study from meeting its stated objectives or your group from formulating valuable recom- mendations to maintain or enhance the reservoir fishery. It probably will force the development of a more conceptual than mathematical model for predicting effects, and one with more assumptions. For example, documented differences in summer benthos populations in areas that were dewatered one winter and not another can be used to project effects on fish that feed on benthos by using trophic transfer coefficients and many assumptions.

Your sampling seems more than adequate to describe the reservoir trophic system and to suggest the important interactions between target fishes and their habitat and food resources. Therefore it should be adequate to conceptualize a trophic model. However, the 3-4 years of data probably will be insufficient to derive relations between reservoir operations and biotic variables, relations that ' are needed to drive a trophic model. Unless operational trends

differ significantly among years and seasons and affect different areas, it will be impossible to attribute a change in fish-food biota or fish to operations.

As you indicated, the best chance for success lies with obtaining significant modification of the water-level regimes in one or two of the years, which would at least permit paired comparisons of means of biotic variables.

138

Page 28 If you pursue a trophic model, you may have difficulty modeling fish species for whom only catch per unit effort data were recorded. Salmo and kokanee should be less of a problem.

Final Annual Report (May-Oct., 1983)

Page 27 (last sentence; 1st full paragraph) Zooplankton production may also be limited by high rates of water exchange (> than once in 30 days). However, production already limited by temperature (in winter) will not be impaired significantly by high rates of water exchange.

(2nd full paragraph) I can think of no better justification for your efforts than the fact that we know virtually nothing about the biology of cold-water fishes in reservoirs. What you find should be valuable to conservation and regulatory agencies who will run into similar problems in the future*

Page 44 (Predicting benefits) I believe the development of a trophic model for fish is premature because it cannot predict effects of operations on fish unless driving variables are identified and related to reservoir operations. Food types consumed by fish are primary driving variables of a trophic model. If you have a species of fish that consumes 3 food types (benthos, zooplankton, prey fishes) and plan to use a trophic model to project effects of water levels on this species, you must guess or project the effects of water levels on the three food types in order to drive the model. You may find you can project effects of some operations (such as drawdown) on fish recruitment, growth, or mortality with- out having to first project effects on fish foods (among other things). Trophic models also tend to have large errors (+ 150 percent of actual values) associated with predictions. A well thought-out conceptual model can be as useful as a mathematical modelj less expensive to develop, and readily changed as new infor- mation becomes available. I recommend a thorough analysis of all data to fill in or correct your existing conceptual model (alluded to in Pages 38 and 43 of the Annual Report and Page 4 of the Work Plan) before considering a complex trophic model. I would guess that other operational constraints will severely limit the amount of operational modification possible.

It would be difficult to justify an elaborate model to predict effects of operations on fish if operations are too inflexible to be altered significantly. From your extensive data collections you should acquire a workable understanding of essential water-level requirements from which you probably could develop a suitable rule curve.

Page 45 (last paragraph) Unless analysis of your data yields relationships that provide other driving variables, your proposed trophic model will be weak.

139

DOE/BP-1 2660-2 June 1985