UMASS/AMHERST » f iiiiiPIH^ 315QbbDD5mbfl43 CES OF DOMESTIC POULTRY '■"1 Edward Brown, F.L.S. 6/" Ne^ DATC DUE 1 •rm^ 'iF >• i. '^'' , _. UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LIBRARY SF 489 A1B7 COP. 2 c^«o MB. EDWAB.D BSOWN'.S WOBKS. POULTRY -KEEPING AS AN IN- DUSTRY FOR FARMERS AND COTTAGERS. By EDWARD BPvOWN, F.L.S , Fifl/t Editinv. Fulln ilhiairnlnl. Crown iio., (is. net. INDUSTRIAL POULTRY-KEEPING, Fi(?ly ilhintrnlnl. Paper Imnrih Is. EDWARD ARNOLD, LONDON: 41 * 43 MADDOX STREET, W. RACES OF DOMESTIC POULTRY DAKK, OR COLOUKED, DOKKINGS. RACES Domestic Poultry EDWARD BROWN, F.L.S. SECRETARY OF THE NATIONAL POULTRY ORGANIZATION SOCIETY ; LECTURER ON AVICULTURE AT THE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, READING; AUTHOR OF 'POULTRY-KEEPING AS AN INDUSTRY FOR FARMERS AND COTTAGERS,' ETC., ETC. WITH ILLUSTRATIONS LONDON EDWARD ARNOLD 41 & 43 MADDOX STREET, BOND STREET, W. 1906 [All rights reserved} LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF MAS^^C'IjCETTS AMHERST, MASS. C 3(^,r PEEFACE OF works dealing with the races of poultry there are many, but in the majority consideration is primarily applied to external characters. Economic properties are relegated to a secondary position, or, where that is not so, the number of races dealt with is limited, and no attempt is made to include breeds of other countries, which, however little they are known at the present time, may yet hold an important position in the future. The attention now paid to poultry-breeding all over the civilized world is great, and rapidly increasing. To this we owe the development of distinctive races evolved by the special conditions of each country, but which are frequently capable of improvement when transported elsewhere. Hence it is necessary to constantly revise our ideas as to the relative values of the different breeds of poultry, more especially by reason of the fact that the attention to economic qualities which, has marked the last fifteen years has led to enhanced production, and may be expected to do so to an even greater extent in the future. To this end new breeds, by which is meant those existent in other countries, and such as are formed by original combinations, should be heartily welcomed so long as they are of practical value. My object has been, therefore, to focus information as to the races of poultry met with in all the countries where breeding is conducted upon advanced lines, but to keep foremost the essential and profitable qualities, rather than to permit merely external, and consequently secondary, characters to absorb attention. How far this objective is realized the following pages will show. No attempt is made to deal with ornamental or purely fancy breeds. I My own study of poultry-breeding has now extended over a period of more than thirty years. During that time the progress made has been phenomenal, not merely in the development of commercial poultry-breeding, as indicated in the companion volume, ' Poultry-Keeping as an Industry for Farmers and Cottagers,' but also in respect to the number of breeds at our disposal. At the commencement of the period named, the Langshan and the Leghorn, the Plymouth Rock and the Wyandotte, the Cam- pine and the Orpington, the Ancona and the Indian Game, the Maline and the Faverolles, amongst fowls, the Pekin and Indian Runner ducks, and the American Bronze turkey, not to mention many others, were entirely or practically unknown to the greater number of British breeders, and it is difficult to imagine what would be the position of affairs were these races swept out of existence. It is not too much to say that they have contributed enormously to the success attained, and that they . have done more, directly and indirectly, than all the older breeds to make profitable modern develop- ments. In the first edition of the work already referred to announcement was made that it was my inten- tion to write a work dealing with the different races of poultry, but that promise has not been fulfilled until now. One reason was that on approaching the subject it was found there was a large number of breeds existent of which little was known, even in the countries to which they were indigenous, and respecting which information was unavailable. Consequently, I determined, as opportunity offered, to visit these countries, to examine the birds where they were common, in order to personally see them, ^ learn their characters and qualities, and thus be able to form a judgment as to their values. During cr> the last few years, in fulfilment of this object, I have visited France, Belgium, Holland, Germany, Den- '"^ mark, Russia, Austria, Hungary, the Balkan States, Italy, and Spain, and the results of these tours, C7i V vi PREFACE covering the greater part of Europe, are seen in the following pages. Many races unknown before to British and American breeds have been found, and the type of others, of which rumour had spoken, determined. As might be expected, many races new to Western knowledge were thus revealed, for the process of evolution of poultry is as varied as the conditions under which they are kept. A more favourable time for these observations could hardly have presented itself. Throughout Europe, as in other parts of the world, within the last decade there has been a great awakening to the importance of poultry as a branch of farm stock, and in respect to the food-supply of our great and growing populations. Hence they have received more attention than at any period of human history, and one of the first steps is seen in the improvement of existing breeds and the introduction of newer and more profitable stock. When this stage is reached, productiveness in respect to eggs and flesh becomes of supreme importance, and a race is judged by what it will yield in either or both of these directions, not what its colour of plumage or fancy points may be. Many of the breeds of poultry lack much in respect to fixity of type, and the great majority, more especially those found in Mid, Eastern, and Southern Europe, cannot compare favourably in productiveness with the best races met -ivith in Western Europe and America. But they are capable of great improvement in these directions, and some, at least, will doubtless ere long, when the principles of selection and breeding are applied to thenij be equal to, and perhaps take the place occupied by, our more prominent breeds, -svhen the latter have lost some, at least, of their present virility as a result of our intensive methods. An attempt is made to trace the origin, history, and distribution of domestic poultry, and to show the evolution of breeds and their classification. The question of distribution is of very great interest, and certain great streams, following the migrations of man, the trend of political influence or commerce, can be traced. Upon this point there is much to be learnt. The farther afield the student travels, the more is the necessity for wider observation apparent. It is evident that one great stream passed by or from China through Central Asia and Siberia to Eastern Europe, perhaps, following the great Mongol invasion in the thirteenth century, but upon that we have no reliable information. Probably many new races of poultry will yet be discovered in Asia, and there is no part of the world which appears to offer the same results to the traveller in search of fresh forms of poultry as that continent. Doubtless its treasures will be revealed some day. In respect to classification, I have followed in Chapter II. the plan first adopted in the companion volume, and which has since become general for utility poultry, but have greatly extended it by the inclusion of tables, giving in a concise form leading characters and qualities. But in dealing with the races of fowls I have been compelled, for simplicity of treatment, to divide them in accordance -with the countries of their origin. As far as possible, the origin, history, and economic qualities of each breed are given, as well as a description, and it is believed that this method will facilitate reference, and lead to appraisement of their respective merits. It will be seen that I have not laid an undue stress upon external characters, but given them their proper position, which is much lower than is generally accorded to them by breeders for exhibition. And, further, as explained in Chapter XVII., I have paid a lesser amount of attention to the colour of the females than of the males, believing that the fixing of rigid standards for hens is wrong in principle and against Nature. The system here advocated is antagonistic to all the previously-adopted canons, and I am prepared for very strong criticism upon this point. It is, however, the result of wide and careful observation, and I believe that in process of time it will be generally accepted by all who do not make ' fancy ' characters their chief object in breeding. This work is not written for fanciers as such. I have no objection to them nor yet to their methods, but their aim is not that of the practical poultry-breeder, and it is the latter I seek to serve. The judging-table in the Appendix will not appeal to breeders of exhibition poultry, but may prove useful where utility is the main object. Special attention is called to the chapters dealing with external characters and their values, and the laws of breeding and their application. The former, I believe for the first time, seeks to learn the PREFACE vii correlation between external characters and internal qualities. That every part of the fowl economy- has some meaning or influence can scarcely be questioned. In the light of greater observation and research some of this may need revision, but it is an earnest attempt to solve an admittedly difficult problem. If we can appreciate the real value of the variations found in the races of poultry the work of breeders will be greatly simplified. As to the laws of breeding, here, too, the extension of our know- ledge must lead to great results — to that quicker attainment of our objective, and to the avoidance of those errors which may hinder complete success. Poultry-breeding is now an international pursuit, knowing no frontiers or arbitrary divisions. To facilitate intercommunication, I have prepared a nomenclature of races and sub-races in several languages, which is given in the Appendix, in which is also given a Scale for judging poultry on utility lines. As far as possible I have acknowledged all references in the text, and where illustrations have been supplied in many cases these are named. But in other ways I have received assistance from many of those who are interested in this subject. The Count de las Navas, Librarian to His Majesty the King of Spain at the Royal Palace, Madrid, has kindly made researches as to the introduction of the turkey into Europe, part of which reached me after the earlier pages had gone to press, and are given in Appendix C ; Mr. F. R. Eaton, Secretary of the Black Sumatra Game Club, has supplied me with informa- tion as to that breed ; Mr. R. Houwink junior. Secretary of the Dutch Poultry Society, has aff'orded invaluable assistance as to the Dutch breeds ; and Mr. J. Pirkner, Chief Inspector of Live Stock, Ministry of Agriculture, Budapest, has helped greatly in connection with the Magyar races ; M. Louis Vander Snickt, of Brussels, has revised the chapter dealing with Belgian races ; Herr Wulf, editor of the Geflilgel Zeitung, Leipsic, that upon German breeds ; and Mr. A. F. Hunter, of West Roxbury, Massa- chusetts, U.S.A., that upon American races. I have received valuable aid in the preparation of the nomenclature of races and s\ib-races from the Count de las Navas, of Madrid ; Mr. S. Spanjaard, of The Hague ; Herr Wulf, of Leipsic ; Mr. W. A. Kock, of Copenhagen ; Mr. Endre Gyorgy, late Hungarian Minister of Agriculture, and Mr. J. H. C. Rickehaus, of St. Petersburg and London. Translations have been made for me by Mr. E. T. S. Dugdale from Italian and Spanish ; by Mrs. Bentley from Dutch ; by Mdlle. Gzosy from Hungarian ; and by my son Mr. Will Brown, from German works. I have to gratefully acknowledge permission to use the following illustrations and blocks : The editor of . PouUry, Black Leghorn and Black Orpington ; Messrs. Vinton and Co., Limited, Silver Spangled Ham- burgh cock, Aseel cock, and pair of Courtes Pattes ; Mr. R. Houwnk junior, of Meppel, Holland, Dutch breeds ; Mr. J. Pirkner, of Budapest, Magyar fowls and White turkeys ; the Hon. Sybil Amherst, Embden geese ; Dr. Wheeler, of the State Agricultural Experiment Station, Kingston, Rhode Island, U.S.A., African and Chinese geese; and the Royal Agricultural Society of England, Cambridge Bronze turkey, as well as others whose names are given below the respective blocks. EDWARD BROWN. The Chestnuts, Thbale, Berks, CONTENTS VII. VIII. XI. XII. XIII. XIV. XV. XVI. XVII. ORIGIN, HISTORY, AND DISTRIBUTION OF DOMESTIC POULTRY EVOLUTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF BREEDS BRITISH RACES OF FOWLS ----- ASIATIC RACES OF FOWLS . . _ - ITALIAN RACES OF FOWLS - FRENCH RACES OF FOWLS - SPANISH RACES OF FOWLS - BELGIAN RACES OF FOWLS - DUTCH RACES OF FOWLS GERMAN RACES OF FOWLS - OTHER EUROPEAN RACES OF FOWLS AMERICAN RACES OF FOWLS RACES OF DOMESTIC DUCKS RACES OF DOMESTIC GEESE - - - - RACES OF DOMESTIC TITRKEYS EXTERNAL CHARACTERS OF POULTRY AND THEIR VALUES LAWS OF BREEDING AND THEIR APPLICATION 1 11 23 .56 71 82 99 112 123 130 180 193' 203 210 APPENDICES A. NOMENCLATURE OF RACES AND SUB-RACES OF POULTRY B. JUDGING ON UTILITY LINES - . - - C. FURTHER NOTES ON THE ORIGIN OF THE TURKEY - 218 227 INDEX LIST OF ILLUSTEATIONS Dark, or Coloured, Dorkings Gallus Ferrugineus - External Characters of a Fowl Various Types of Combs of Fowls - Feather Markings of Fowls Silver-grey Dorking Cock - Silver-grey Dorking Hen - White Dorking Fowls lied Sussex Fowls - Old English Game Fowls - Modern Show Game Fowls - Indian (Cornish) Game Fowls Silver-spangled Hamburgh Cock - Black Hamburgh Fowls Redcap Fowls Scotch Grey Fowls - Black Orpington Cock Buff Orpington Fowls Light Brahma Cock (English type) Light Brahma Cock (American typo) Dark Brahma Fowls (English type) Partridge Cochin Fowls Bed Malay Cock - Black Langshan Fowls White Aseel Cook - Black Sumatra Fowls White Leghorn Fowls Buff Leghorn Fowls Black Leghorn Cock Ancona Fowls White Bresse Cock - White Bresse Hen - La Fleohe Fowls Crevecoeur Fowls Courtes Pattes Fowls Houdan Fowls Faverolles Fowls Castilian Fowls Minorca Fowls of 100 years ago Black Minorca Fowls Andalusian Fowls - Prat Fowls - Silver Campine Fowls Silver Braekel Cock Silver Braekel Hen - Frontispit 85 77. 87 78. 89 79. 91 80. 94 81. 100 82. 103 83. 105 84 108 85 110 113 86. 87 115 88. 115 89 Brabant Fowls Crested Dutch Fowls Silver-laced Owl-bearded Dutch Fowls Single-combed Friesland Fowls - Rose-combed Friesland Fowls Drente Fowls Lakenfelder Fowls White Ranaelsloh Fowls - Mottled Schlotterkamm Fowls Bergische Grower Fowls - Silver Thuringian Fowls - Silver Polish Fowls White Magyar Cock Barred Plymouth Rock Cock Barred Plymouth Rock Pullet White Plymouth Rock Cock Buff Plymouth Rock Cock Buff Plymouth Rock Pullet Silver Wyandotte Fowls - Golden Wyandotte Cock - Golden Wyandotte Pullet - White Wyandotte Fowls - Silver-pencilled Wyandotte Fowls Single-combed Rhode Island Red Pullet Rose-combed Rhode Island Red Cock Rose-combed Rhode Island Red Pullet Bouen Ducks Aylesbury Duck - Pekin Ducks Indian Runner Ducks Huttegem Ducks - Blue Swedish Ducks Roman Goose Embden Gander - Embden Goose Toulouse Geese Pomeranian Gander White Chinese Geese Brown Chinese Geese African Geese Black Norfolk Turkeys - White Turkeys Cambridge Bronze Turkey Bronze American Turkey Cook Bronze American Turkey Hen 121 125 126 127 128 129 131 132 133 184 136 140 147 151 152 153 154 155 156 158 159 160 161 162 162 164 167 170 172 173 1.75 176 181 182 182 EACES OF DOMESTIC POULTRY CHAPTER I ORIGIN, HISTORY, AND DISTRIBUTION OF DOMESTIC POULTRY Fowl — Duck— Goose — Turkey IN endeavouring to trace the origin o£ our domesti- cated breeds of poultry, it is essential at the outset to remember that the first civilization of man was Asiatic, which to a large extent explains why so many (species of domestic animals have come to us from that continent. When man lived in the primitive state, and was a savage, as can be proved by the small number of uncivilized races yet known, animals and birds were wild also. He lived by hunting and shooting, migrating to follow the supply of food, and increasing — or decreasing — in numbers largely in conformity with the number of animals and birds within his reach, for he existed principally upon the flesh of those creatures which could be trapped or killed. Many of the earlier forms of arms were apparently devised to assist him in his work. Not until man began to realize the value of wealth did he attempt to bring the lower races into direct sub- jection. It is clearly shown in the Old Testament Scriptures that the earliest developments were when the ancients became owners of flocks and herds. As Mr. G. L. Gomme * states : ' The Aryans, when they entered India, were almost entirely a pastoral people, whose wealth consisted in their cattle, and who looked on agricultm^'e and trade as degrading.' It was not until the need for mutual protection or increasmg population had made the continuance of a nomadic life almost impossible, which led to the establishment of village settlements, that poultry of various species were domesticated. Then the food-supply must be provided near by. Cultivation of the land and domestication of smaller animals and bu-ds naturally followed. How this was accomplished need not delay us, but there is a deep vein of truth in Rudyard Kipling's ' Just-so Stories. 'f The animals received in return for sacrifice of liberty comfort, protection, and food. In process of time the greater requirements of growing numbers of * ' The Village Community,' by G. L. Gomme (Londou, 1S90), p. 29. t ' Just-so Stories,' by Budyard Kipling (London, 1902). consumers led to the adoption of new methods, and with fixed habitations food must be produced at or brought to the villages. In so far as poultry were con- cerned, domestication was comparatively easy, either by capture of the parent stock, or by taking alive the birds when young in the first place, and later by securing eggs from the wild nests and hatching these by means of specimens already tamed. It is known in certain species how quickly the wild instinct can be subjugated, and the progeny induced to accept new conditions. It is therefore with these facts before us that we approach the consideration of the origin of the species of poultry. FOWL. Genus : Galli. NoMENCLAi'UBE : English, Fowl; French, Volaille ; German, Gefliigel ; Otitch, Hoender ; Italian, Pollame ; Spanish, Gallidos; Danish, Honse ; Iiwuiarian,'Fa,]\ak; Russian, Ptitsa domashni. Considerable attention has been given to the study of the origin of the domestic fowl. Naturalists are agreed so far, but there are differences upon which they are unable to agree. For a time the opinion of the late Professor Darwin that our domestic fowls are all derived from one stock— the Oallus BanMva, or jungle fowl of India — found almost general acceptance, but more recently doubts have been thrown upon that view. The question is therefore still in a state of uncertainty, and in the absence of clearer information than has yet been obtained it is likely to remaiir so. There is one thing certain, however, that the majority of our breeds of fowl are derived from the wild-fowl named above, and also that the fowl originated in Eastern and Southern Asia. Naturalists recognise four members of the genus Gallus. These are as follows : (1) The G. Sonneratii, which is found in the more southern districts of India. At one time it was thought to be the parent RACES OF DOMESTIC POULTRY of our domestic breeds, but students have noted in it marked differences. Tlie domestic fowl does not exhibit, so far as has yet been seen, any of its peculiarities, and there is now no one who accords it that position. (2) The G. Stanleyii, which is only found in the island of Ceylon. With the exception of the colour of the comb, this genus resembles the domestic fowl so closely that some naturalists were at one time inclined to regard it as the parent species. It has, however, a singularly different voice, which is unknown in domestic fowls. (3) The G. furcatus. This variety inhabits Java and the islands eastward as far as Flores, but it is so different in many characteristics from the tamed fowl that no one regards it as the parent of any races. It has green plumage, an unserrated comb, and a single median wattle. (4) The G. ferrugineus or Bankiva (Fig. 1). Of this variety Darwin* says: 'It has a much wider geographical range than the three pre- vious species. It inhabits Northern India as far west as Scinde, and ascends the Himalayas to a height of 4,000 feet ; it inhabits Burmah. the Malay Peninsula, the Indo-Chinese countries, the Philippine Islands, and the Malayan Archipelago as far eastward as Timor. This species varies considerably in the wild state. Mr. Blyth informs me that the specimens, both male and female, brought from near the Himalayas are rather paler coloured than those brought from other parts of India, whilst those from the Malay Peninsula and Java are brighter coloured than the Indian birds. . . . The wild G. Bankiva agrees most closely with the black-breasted red game breed in colouring and in all other respects, except in being smaller and in the tail being carried more horizontally ; but the manner in which the tail is carried is highly variable in many of our breeds. ... It is a significant fact that the voice of both male and female G. BanMva closely resembles, as Mr. Blyth and others have noted, the voice of both sexes of the common domestic fowl, but the last note of the crow of the wild bird is rather less prolonged. Captain Hutton, well known for his researches into the natural history of India, mforms me that he has seen several crossed fowls from the wild species and the Chinese Bantam ; these crossed fowls breed freely with bantams, but unfortunately were not crossed inter se. Captain Hutton reared chickens from the eggs of the G. Bankiva; and these, at first very wild, afterwards became so tame that they would crowd round his feet. He did not succeed m rearing them to maturity, but, as he remarks, " no wild galhnaoeous bird thrives well at first on hard grain." Mr. Blyth also fomid much difficulty in keep- ing G. Bankiva in confinement. In the Philippine Islands, however, the natives succeed much better, as they keep wild cocks to fight with their domestic game birds. Sir Walter Elliot informs me that the hen of * ' Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication,' by Charles Darwin (London, 18S5), vol. i., p. 247. a native domestic breed of Pegu is undistinguish- able from the hen of the wild G. Bankiva, and the natives constantly catch wild cocks by taking tame cocks to fight with them in the woods. Mr. Crawford remarks that from etymology it might be argued that the fowl was first domesticated by the Malay and the Javanese. It is also a curious fact that wild specimens of the G. Bankiva brought from the countries east of the Bay of Bengal are far more easily tamed than those of India. Nor is this an unparalleled fact ; for, as Humboldt long ago remarked, the same species sometimes evinces a more tameable disposition in one country than in another. If we suppose that the G. Bankiva was first tamed in Malaya and afterwards imported into India, we can understand the observa- tion made to me by Mr. Blyth, that the domestic fowls of India do not resemble the wild G. Bankiva of India more closely than do those of Europe.' We have given at length these particulars respecting G. Bankiva, for whether the opinion that all our domestic breeds do not owe their origin to this genus ever becomes an established theory or not, it is certain that the great majority of our varieties are its descen- dants, and therefore it claims from us the greatest- share of attention. That which has brought doubts into the muids of students has been the habits of the heavy feather-legged races from China — Brahmas and Cochins — which are altogether different from most of the other breeds of poultry. It is true that poultry- breeders have held this opinion always, but then ideas have been disregarded by naturalists as unscientific. The differences of habit were described in the Field newspaper by a writer as follows : ' After a year or two of preliminary examination ' (this refers to fifty years ago, when Cochins were first introduced), ' I adopted this method of managing the Cochin Chinas : As soon as a brood was as big as thrushes it was taken with its nurse and put into a field. The hen was cooped until she was settled to her range, after which the coop was removed, and an ordinary tea-chest, laid upon its side, was put in its place, an old door or some loose boards being leaned over its mouth. "^Tien the bnds got as big as partridges even this shelter was removed, for it was noticed that, unlike other poultry, which in similar circumstances seek the hedgerows and trees for shelter, the Cochin Chinas preferred to "jug," as partridges do in the middle of the fields. The habit is in itself quite unlike that of any other variety of poultry, all of which are, when free to choose, arboreal in their habits. The next distinction was seen when the pullets began to lay. If there were any coop accessible which had been used as a lodging, they would deposit their very abnormally coloured eggs therein ; but if there were not, the descendants of some imported bnds never sought for a place of shelter under a bush or some hidden spot as other poultry do, but always chose some heap of mould or small elevation. ORIGIN OF THE DOMESTIC FOWL and laid on the top of this, quite indifferent to the eggs being exposed to sight, so they were above the ordinary level of the land. This peculiarity is strongly marked. ' From these idiosyncrasies I have inferred that this variety of fowl could not be descended from the tree- roosting, bush-haunting ancestor of the game cock, etc. All the indications, slight, perhaps, m themselves, yet not without weight when taken together, go to show that the ancestors of the Shanghai must have been found by "the humans" who annexed them in quarters unlike an Indian jungle, i.e., in some scantily-vegetated desert, and watered — when watered at all — by rivers fed at a distance by melted snow, which came down in force when the bu'ds were sitting on eggs. The extreme stupidity of the Shanghai proves that it could have had, in its native habitat, few- enemies to contend against, as does its readiness to accept the protection of man. When both were free to range at will, the game fowl always "cut" the Cochin most persistently ; and for the most part the game cock, when at liberty, will refuse to accept the advances of the widowed Shanghai hen. He will generally drive her away.' It is evident from the tone of Darwin's works that he was well aware of the somewhat slender evidence in support of the theory that the domestic fowls are all descended from one species, for he says :* ' We have not such good evidence with fowls as with pigeons of all the breeds being descended from a single primitive stock. In both oases the argument of the fertility must go for something ; in both we have the improba- bihty of man having succeeded in ancient times in thoroughly domesticating several supposed species^ most of these supposed species being extremely ab- normal as compared with then- natural allies — all being now either unknown or extinct, though the parent form of no other domesticated bu-d [has been lost.' The remarkable variations in many species led the great naturalist to the belief that his opinion was the true one, and that all fowls owe their origin to the O. ferrugineus. It has already been mentioned that poultry-breeders, as such— that is, those who did not pretend to be naturalists — have held the opinion that all our races of fowls were not due to one species — at least, not to one of the species now extant. Naturahsts, however, have until lately accepted Darwin's theory, but in the Field newspaper there appeared a letter from the pen of Mr. W. B. Tegetmeier, F.Z.S., who was an asso- ciate of Darwin in many of his researches, which is an important acknowledgment that the generally ac- cepted theory may after all be wrong. In this letter Mr. Tegetmeier says :t 'It maybe regarded as most presumptuous in me to dare to contest the conclusions * ' Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication,' by Charles Darwin (London, 188.5), vol. i., p. 251. t Field, London, September 26, 1885. arrived at bj' the honoured master Darwin, with whom and for whom it was for some years my privilege to work ; but a careful and extended consideration of the facts has led me to a different conclusion to that arrived at by him. That the domesticated fowl in India is derived from the first species is evident from the fact that sportsmen occasionally confound the wild and the tame birds. ' Last season (1884) at the Zoological Gardens, numerous half-bred birds were reared from G. Stan- leyii, and in former years many were bred from a single specimen of G. furcatzis. There is no doubt that the several wild Galh will interbreed and produce fertile offspring as readily as do the corresponding and closely allied pheasants, in which the three species — the Chinese, the Versicolour, and the Colchican — have become so mixed that pure birds are rarer than mongrels. I have no doubt in my own mind that the wild Galli have mtermixed in not a few instances, and perhaps through not a few centuries, in producing our domestic breeds. ' But it is with regard to the Eastern Asiatic type of fowl (absurdly known as Cochins and Brahmas) that my doubts as to the descent from the G. ferrugineus are strongest. We have in the Cochin a fowl so different from the ordinary domestic birds that when first introduced the most ridiculous legends were current respecting it. Putting these on one side, we have a bird with many structural peculiarities that could hardly have been induced by domestication. Thus, the long axis of the occipital foramen in the Cochin is perpendicular, in our old breeds horizontal, a difference that could never have been bred for, and which it is difficult to see could be correlative with any other change. The same may be said respecting the deep sulcus or groove up the centre of the frontal bone- The extraordinary diminution in the size of the flight feathers and that of the pectoral muscles could hardly have been the result of human selection and careful breeding, as the value of the birds as articles of food is considerably lessened by the absence of flesh on the breast. Nor is the extreme abmidance of fluffy, soft body feathers a character likely to be desired in a fowl. The vastly increased size may have been a matter of selection, although, as the inhabitants of Shanghai feed their poultry but scantily, and, according to Mr. Fortune, mamly on paddy or unhusked rice, it is not easy to see how the size of the breed was obtained if, as is generally surmised, it arose from the little jungle fowl. ' Taking all these facts into consideration, I am in- duced to believe that the birds of the Cochin type did not descend from the same species as our game fowl. It may be asked what bird I would suggest as the origin of these Eastern Asiatic breeds. In reply I would suggest the possibility, or even probability, of their being descended from some easily captured and 1—2 RACES OF DOMESTIC POULTRY readily domesticated short - winged species that may have entirely passed into a state of domestication, as has the camel and the horse. I can see no inherent impossibility in this suggestion, nor any fatal objection to the theory I have advanced.' We have, therefore, arrived thus far, namely, that there is more than a doubt in the minds of naturalists, for Mr. Tegetmeier is not alone in his opinion as to the theory advanced by Darwin. The idea is that we must go further back to find a common progenitor, one which was the parent of all the four species of Galh the fact that another feature of G. furcatus) not usually found in the domestic breed most resembling it still appears occasionally by reversion in that same breed. Hence, we are disposed to think that the original type can only be found still further back ; that it diverged into various sub-types, including the four wild breeds still known, and developed through the Q. Bankiva into the Games, while other breeds were reached through collateral branches, now either extinct or possibly still further modified into the present other three known races. It is possible enough that some wild Fig. 1.— G.iLLDS Fbeeugineus that have been named. It is very interesting to note that the first advancement of this view was not from a naturalist, but a poultry-breeder. In the first edition of Wright's ' Book of Poultry ' the following appeared :* ' There are tendencies in some of our domestic breeds which certainly are not due to the O. ferrugineus, and which, as they are found in the (?. furcatus, are probably the result of natural rather than artificial development, a conclusion which is strengthened by * ' Book of Poultry,' by Lewis Wright, first edition (London, 1874), pp. 500-501. species or variety of greater size than any now known may have either disappeared or become degraded.' To sum up, therefore, it may be taken that with the domestic fowl, as with many other natural forms of life, we can go so far back, but no further. The proba- bility is that, as in the case of dogs, aU the varieties of fowls do not owe their origin to any one species, at any rate of those now extant, and that wc must look to another progenitor tlian the (I. ffrruginetis for several of the later introduced races, more especially those from China. ORIGIN OF THE DOMESTIC DUCK G-Exus : Anas bosclias. NoirENCLATURE : EnfiHsh. Duck; Frenclt, Canard; German, Enten ; /'«(r7(,Eenden ; Italian, hyiaXiie; Spanish, Ptxtos; Vanisli, Mndev: Hunr/arian. Kucsa; Bussian,Vtka.. The suggestion has been made that the domesticated duck known in Europe was originally imported from Asia, which is probablj' true to some extent. It is impossible, however, to come to any other conclusion than that the majority of our breeds have descended from the mallard, or wild duck, which is widely dis- tributed, ranging from Eastern Asia to North America, and is a regular Adsitor to nearly every part of Europe. When and how such domestication first took place it is difficult to say, but certainly before the Christian era, for Columella, who lived in the first century and wrote upon animal husbandry, says that ' when anyone is desirous of establishing a duckery, it is a very old mode to collect the eggs of teal, maUard, etc., and to place them under common hens ; for the young thus hatched and reared cast off their wild tempers, and undoubtedly breed A\-hen confined in menageries. For if it is your plan to place fresh-caught birds that are accustomed to a free mode of life in captivity thej' will be slow breeders in a state of bondage.' * He further says that the places in which they are kept should con- sist of high walls, covered in to prevent their flying away. That is proof of the partial domestication, as it could scarcely be expected that they would be tamed in the first generation. Dixon states t that he is inclined ' to consider our race of farmyard ducks as an importation, through whatever channel, from the East, and to point out the discovery of the passage of the Cape of Good Hope (1493) as the approximate date. The early voyagers speak of finding them in the East Indies exactly similar to ours, and the transmission of a few pahs would be a much easier task than to subdue the shyness and wild- ness of the mallard.' It is possible that such importations took place 400 years ago, as they have within the last half century, and may thus have introduced specific races ; but the evidence of Columella given above shows that prior to that time domestication had taken place in Europe, and we are justified in assuming that the same method was adopted in Asia. Mr. Dixon saj'S further: J; ' I know of no instance in which anyone has finally succeeded in founding a permanent tame farmyard race of ducks by breeding from the mallard.' The late Mr. Edward Hewitt in 1862 § described his attempts to breed wild ducks upon a pond or lake near his residence. The eggs were taken from the wild • Lib. VIII., cap. 1.5. t ' Ornamental and Domestic Poultry,' by Rev. E. S. Dixon (London, 1850), p 127. I Ibid.,ip. 129. I Journal of Hortindfure. vol. xxviii. (London, 13G2), p. 773. birds' nests and hatched under an ordinary duck. ' Until a month old we " cooped " the old duck, but left the youngsters free. They grew up invariably quite tame, and bred freely the next and following years. There was one universal drawback, however. Although not admitted when grown up to the society of tame ducks, they always in two or three generations betrayed prominent marks of deterioration ; in fact, they became domesticated. The beautiful carriage of the wild mal- lard and his mate, as seen at the outset, changed gradually to the easy, well-to-do, comfortable deport- ment of a small Eouen, for they, at each reproduction, became much larger.' Mr. Hewitt made several experi- ments of this nature with the same result, in some cases white feathers appearing in the wings. The conclusions arrived at by the late Professor Darwin were that all the domesticated ducks have descended from the wild duck. He says* that 'almost all naturalists admit that the several breeds are descended from the common wild duck {Anas bosclias) ; most fanciers, on the other hand, take, as usual, a very different view. Unless we deny that domestication, prolonged during centuries, can affect such unimportant characters as colour, size, and, in a slight degree, proportional dimensions and mental dis- position, there is no reason whatever to doubt that the domestic duck is descended from the common wild species, for the one differs from the other in no impor- tant character. We have some historical evidence with respect to the period and progress of the domestication of the duck. It w-as unknown to the ancient Egyptians, to the Jews of the Old Testament, and to the Greeks of the Homeric period. . . . The origin of the domestic duck from the wild species is recognised in nearly every language of Europe, as Aldrovandi long ago remarked, by the same name being applied to both. The wild duck has a wide range from the Himalayas to North America, and the crossed offspring are perfectly fertile. Both in North America and Europe the wild duck has been found easy to tame and breed.' And the great naturalist also calls attention to a striking peculiarity,! that ' in the great duck family one species alone— namely, the male of A. bosclias — has its four middle tailfeathers curled upwardly. Now, in every one of the above-named domestic breeds these curled feathers exist, and on the supposition that they are descended from distinct species, we must assume that man formerly hit upon species all of which had this now rmique character.' Darwin, in the work referred to, gave a large amount of interesting information showing the uni- versal resemblances between the mallard and races of domestic ducks, with such variations as would result RACES OF DOMESTIC POULTRY from changed conditions and the increased and de- creased use of the limbs. With reference to what he states as to the opinions of fanciers differing from those of naturalists, this is explainable by the fact that the latter think chiefly of the species, whereas the former are concerned with breeds. The variations in external characters are so uuportant to breeders that they are disposed to unduly exalt their value ; but these are secondary, and can be produced with comparative ease. The one serious argument in favour of non- relationship between the wild and tame races is that the former are monogamous and the latter polygamous, but that is insufficient to weigh against the mass of evidence on the other side. We can accept, therefore, the contention that the mallard is parent to all our domestic ducks, but are equally convinced that some of our breeds have been domesticated in Asia and others in Europe. Genus : Anser cinereus. NoMENCLATUEE : English, Goose; French, Oie; German, Ganse; Dutch, Ganzen; Italian, Oche; Spanish, Ocas; Danish, Goes ; Hungarian, Ludak ; Rzcisian, Gus. Unlike the domestic fowl and the turkey, neither of which is indigenous to Europe, the former coming from Asia and the latter from America, the goose in its wild form is a denizen of Europe and North Africa, which fact doubtless explains much in relation to it. But members of the same family are known in other parts of the globe. Hehn * indicates that references to the goose are found in Sanskrit writings, and says that ' it would be rash to conclude from this that the goose was a tame domestic animal among the primitive Aryan stock before the great migration. It was doubtless well known and much sought after on the lakes and streams and in the swampy lowlands, as it is nov.' among the nomads and half-nomads of Central Asia. Where it was still abundant and easy to obtain there was no necessity for breeding it artificially in confine- ment ; and so long as men's manner of life was un- settled, a bird that takes thirty days to hatch and a proportionate length of time to rear its young was un- suitable to the economy of a pastoral people. But when comparatively stationary settlements were found on the shores of lakes, the young birds could easily be fetched down from their nests by boys, have their wings clipped, and be brought up in the households ; if they died, the attempt was repeated until it finally succeeded, especially as the wild goose is, compara- tively speaking, one of the easiest birds to tame.' The wild goose, commonly called the Greylag {Anser ferus), is distributed all over Europe, but it conducts its young to the shores of the JMediterranean, both * 'Wanderings of Plants and Animals from their First Home,' by Victor Hehn (London, 1S85), p. '27S. northern and southern, there to rear them, breeding, however, in the colder latitudes. Of wild geese the varieties known in this country at the present time are the Greylag, abeady mentioned, the Bean, the White-fronted or laughing goose, and the Pink-footed. It is very generally concluded that our domesticated varieties are all descended from the Greylag, which at one period bred extensively in the fen districts of Eastern England ; but since the drain- age of those areas it has been compelled to find a location elsewhere. In Scotland, both on the main- land and in the western islands, it is found, but to a much greater extent in Ireland, especially in some of the central counties. The Bean goose is much more common, and large numbers of the White-fronted geese arrive as soon as winter sets in on the Continent of Europe. Between the Greylag and the Bean there are resemblances which are apt to mislead. At one time it was suggested that the Chinese goose %\'as of a distinct species to the Greylag, but Mr. Blythe testi- fied that the two breed together, and that their progeny were fertile. His opinion was that the common goose of India was a hybrid between these types. What has led naturahsts to conclude that the domestic goose owes its origin to the Greylag is not only that the two will breed together, but that there are strong resem- blances between them. In Wingfield and Johnson's ' Poultry Book '* Mr. Yarrell is quoted as saying that ' the Zoological Society of London, possessing a pinioned wild Greylag gander, which had never as- sociated with either Bean goose or White-fronted goose, though both were kept on the same water with him, a domestic goose, selected in the London market from the circumstance of her exhibiting in her plumage the marks which belong to and distinguish the true Greylag species, was this season (1841) brought and put down to him. The pair were confined together for a few days, became immediately good friends, and a sitting of eight eggs was the conse- quence. These eggs were hatched, and the young proved prolific. Some were hatched in two following seasons, and some of their descendants still remain at the Gardens.' And when at the Regent's Park the Greylag and the domestic goose have been placed side by side, the resemblances between the two proved most apparent. It may, consequently, be taken as an accepted opinion that the origin of our domestic varie- ties is to be found in the Crreylag goose. The method of domestication is not recorded, so far as we are aware, but it would be either by securing eggs or young birds from the nests of the wild parents. Charles Darwin f writes : ' Although the domestic goose certainly differs somewhat from any known wild * ' The Poultry Book,' by Wingfield and .Johnson (London, 1853), p. 260. + ' Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication,' by Charles Darwm, vol. i., pp. 301-305. ORIGIN OF THE DOMESTIC TURKEY species, yet the amount of variation which it has under- gone, as compared with that of most domesticated animals, is singularly small. This fact can bo parti- ally accounted for by selection not having come largely into play. Birds of all kinds which present many •distinct races are valued as pets or ornaments. No one makes a pet of a goose ; the name, indeed, in more languages than one is a term of reproach. The goose is valued for its size and flavour, for the white- ness of its feathers, which adds to their value, and for its prohficness and tameness. In all these points the goose differs from the wild parent form; and these are the points which have been selected.' One other distinct gain from domestication is the increase of size, and this is noticeable in nearly all birds and animals which have adapted themselves to the altered conditions of life, and to the greater cer- tainty of food resultant from domestication. And it is also true that more eggs are produced by the tame goose than by her wild sister. TUEKEY. Genus : Meleagris. Nomenclature : English, Turkey ; French, Dindon ; German, Truthiihner ; i?!(«c/(, Kalkoenen ; JfaZian, Taoohini ; iSyjanis/j, Pavos ; Danish, Kalkuu ; Swedish, Kalkon ; Hangarian, Pulyka; Turkish, la&i&n; fliissian, Indiukh. The scientific name given to the turkey, Meleagris, is accounted for by the fact that when first introduced the race was not recognised as an altogether new species, and was unknown in the Eastern Hemisphere prior to the discovery of America by Christopher Columbus. The Greeks and Romans called what appears to be the guinea-fowl Meleagrides, or Gallince Africance, and when the explorers of the West returned from their voyages of discovery to the New World, it was thought that the tm-key was of that species. Belon, the French naturalist ^1553), is credited with being the originator of the erroneous classification, but Linnaeus followed him, and it is now universal. The term Meleagris Gallvpavo reveals the fact that the turkey was thought to be allied to the guinea and the domestic fowls, but scientific names are as liable to error as breed designations. It is generally accepted by naturalists that the domesticated turkey has descended from the wild species found in Mexico and Central America {M. Mexi- cana), which appears to be correct so far as the earlier forms were concerned ; but it is undoubted that many modern American turkeys, as the Mammoth Bronze, own the race found in the United States and Canada {M. Americana), for the introduction of wild blood has been regularly resorted to in order to secure en- hanced size. We are led to this conclusion from the evidence that the turkeys imported from America into Europe nearly 400 years ago were largely black in plumage, thus closely following the Mexican, which explains why so many European breeds are black, wholly or partly ; whereas the later races are bronze, which colour is characteristic of the wild American turkey. Darwin says * that ' F. Michaux suspected in 1802 that the common domestic turkey was not descended from the United States species alone, but likewise from a Southern form ; and he went so far as to believe that English and French turkeys differed from having different proportions of the blood of the two parent forms.' There is, however, very great affinity between the M. Mexicana and M. Americana, and Darwm records f that ' in the United States wild male turkeys sometimes court the domestic hens, which are de- scended from the Mexican form, and are generally received by them with great pleasure.' The fact that these wild males have, since Darwin wrote, been used much more freely for breeding is further proof of their relationship, and it may safely be accepted that the two forms are varieties of the same race. Other species of turkeys are to be met with in America, such as the Honduras and the crested turkey of Mexico, but they do not appear to have been amen- able to domestication. That the turkey had been domesticated by the aboriginal inhabitants of America would appear to be certain. This view was held by Darwin, and it is not unreasonable to suppose that it would be the case, as in some of the nations thus revealed to the Eastern world there was a considerable measm-e of civilization. This opinion is supported by Prescott, who says % that ' the Spaniards saw immense numbers of turkeys in the domesticated state on their arrival in Mexico, where they were more common than any other poultry. They were found wild, not only in New Spain, but all along the continent, in the less fre- quented places, from the North-Western territory of the United States to Panama. The wild turkey is larger, more beautiful, and in every way an incom- parably finer bird than the tame.' And, further, speaking of the city of Mexico when Cortes first , visited the capital, 'no less than 500 turkeys, the cheapest meat in Mexico,' were allowed for the feeding of the vultures and eagles kept in the Eoyal aviaries. A French writer § says : ' Oviedo spoke, in 1526, of a species of Gallipavo (peacock) domesticated in New Spain, bred in that country by the Christian colonists, and which probably were embarked on the ships leaving for Europe.' Other writers have stated that it had existed under domestication for centuries when the Spaniards con- * ' Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication,' by Charles Darwin (London, 1885), vol. i., p. 308. + Ibid., p. 308. ■*: ' Conquest of Mexico,' by William H. Prescott (London, 187-2), pp. 44, 204. § 'Les Oiaeaux de Basse Cour,' par P^emy Samt-Loup (Paris, 1895), p. 295. RACES OF DOMESTIC POULTRY quered Mexico. Kene de Laudonniere reports to have found them on landing in North America in 1564, and twenty years later they were discovered in Virginia. As the North American continent was opened up, travellers found the wild turkey as a denizen of the woods and forests. Thus there is no doubt as to the origin of this species, as it can be traced without difficulty. In size the wild turkey is much larger than those found under domestication. Males have been shot during recent years weighing up to 60 pounds, but these were old birds. The largest we have seen among tame specimens was 47 pounds, but it had been specially fed up, and the general average of the best birds is not more than half the last-named weight, and many others do not exceed 12 to 15 pounds at nine or ten months old. This decrease in size may be attributed to loss of vigour as a result of changed conditions, probably to limitation of exercise, but principally to the use of immature stock for breeding, as these birds do not reach their maturity until they are three or four years of age. At the same time selections would be rather for medium than very large size, as the huge specimens are not suitable for ordinary farm purposes. ' In India the climate has apparently wrought a still greater effect in the turkey, for it is described by Mr. Blythe as being much degen- erate in size, utterly incapable of rising on the wing, of a black colour, and with the long pendulous appendages over the beak enormously developed.'* Buffon mentions that the turkeys found in China were not indigenous to that country, but had been imported. With the settlement of North America and the en- closure of the open lands the number of wild turkeys will gradually be reduced. Hence the source of supply in that direction will probably be dried up, and breeders be compelled, therefore, to depend upon our present stocks. Fortunately, the distribution of the race is very wide, and it has fully adapted itself to domestication. The names given to the turkey vary considerably, as shown above. The French name is derived from that of the hen turkey, dinde — d'Indon, or of India — which is practically that of most European countries. But the English name arises in the way explained by Helm :t ' At the beginning of the sixteenth century "Turkish " only meant foreign, or come from over the sea ; at that time geographic ideas were too indefinite to distinguish exactly the West from the East Indies, and both from the land of the Turks.' Merchants trading abroad were called Turkey merchants, and thus it is easy to see how the name came to be applied, if, as we believe was the case, the earliest birds were brought from Spain by ships calling there on returning from the Orient. * 'Variation of Animals and Plants nnder Domestication,' by Charles Darwin (London, 1885), vol. i., p. 310. f ' Wanderings of Plants and Animals,' by Victor Hehn (London, 1885), p. 497. In respect to the distribution of the turkey little need be said. From Spain, where it was first brought into Europe, it spread to Britain and France, supple- mented by direct importations from America, and by way of the Netherlands and Italy to other parts of the Continent. DISTRIBUTION OF THE DOMESTIC FOWL. From the evidence which has come to us it would appear that the sport of cock-fighting had as much responsibility for the domestication of the fowl as demand for food, and that, when once it was brought into the service of man, sport was chiefly instrumental in making the species popular. Cock-fighting has been for many centuries followed extensively in Southern and Western Asia, and in the islands of Sumatra, Java, Borneo, the Philippines, etc. In India, among the native Princes, it is yet a favourite pastime. When it is remembered that* 'the first mention of cook-fighting is said to be in the reign of Crcesus, King of Lydia (a.m. 3426), and in India it is men- tioned in the "Codes" of Mann, written 1,000 years before Christ,' it will be realized how ancient is the sport. At a period when war was the natural order of things it can be understood how attractive these warrior-like birds -would be to soldiers, who on their return home would take back with them specimens of such rare fowls. It is suggested that the Persians thus- introduced the fo\\l into their own country after their conquest of India by Cyrus about 537 B.C. Two- hundred years later Persia was conquered by th& Greeks under Alexander, and thus the fowl was- brought to Greece, where it was called the ' Persian ' bird. Upon this question there is, however, considerable- doubt. Hehn states t : ' The original home of the fowl was India, and it first migrated West with the Medo- Persian invaders. In a work on the temple of the- Damian Hera, Menodotus says, ' As the cock spread from Persia, so the sacred peacock spread from the temple of Hera to the surrounding districts.' In the re- ligion of Zoroaster the dog and the cock were sacred animals : the first as the faithful guardian of flocks and herds, the second as the herald of dawn and the symbol of light and the sun. The cock is specially dedicated to- Craosha, the heavenly watchman, who, awakened by fire, awakens the cock in his turn ; he by his crowing drives away the Dievas, evil spirits of darkness, par- ticularly the yellow, long fingered Bushyacta, the demon of sleep. A passage in the Bundesesh runs : " Halka^ the cock, is the enemy of the devs and the magicians. He assists the dog, as is written in the law. Among * ' Old English Game Fowl,' by Herbert Atkinson (London, 1831), p. 10. t ' 'W'anderings of Plants and Animals,' bv Victor Hehu (London, 1885), pp. •241-'242. UISTRlBUTIOxN OF THE DOMESTIC FOWL ihe earthly creatures that plague Daruj, the cook and the dog unite theu strength. He shall keep watch over the world, even as if there were no dog to protect the flocks and houses. When the cock and the dog fight with Daruj, thej- weaken him, who, else, A\-ould torment men and animals. Therefore, it is said, by him, the cock, shall all the enemies of goodness be overcome; his voice scatters the evil." Wherever a Persian settled he took as inuch care to procure a cock as to pray and wash before and during sunrise. As far as the limits of the Persian dominion reached, there, no doubt, the tame and useful, easily-transported, and at the same time so pecuhar creature, found a welcome in the households of non-believers. On the so-called Harpies monument from the Acropolis of Xanthus, in Lycia (now in London), there is the figure of a god to whom a cock is brought as a gift or sacrifice. If this monu- ment, as archaeologists suppose, really belongs to a period before the taking of Xanthus by the Persians, then the Lycians must indeed have been acquainted with the cock before the spread of the Persian dominions. If the domestic fowl had been familiar to the Lycians long before the Persian time, the Greeks must have shared in the knowledge ; but neither in the works of Homer and Hesiod, nor in the fragments of the elder poets, is there any trace of cock or hen. Surely among people who had no clocks the prophet that proclaimed the hours by night, the proudly strutting, winking, crowing Sir Chanticleer, the supremely jealous sultan (Salax gallus) surrounded by his harem, the hot, vain- glorious champion armed with his comb, tassels, and spurs, Dame Partlet announcing to the world her last achievement — all this merry parody of a human family and aristocratic manners could not fail to be a frequent subject of description and comparison had the poets an opportunity of observing it. It did not escape even the ancients that Homer, though he used the proper names Aleetor and Alestroyan, seemed to know nothing of the fowl so called. In the writings of Epicharmus, who flourished during the Persian wars, and in those of Simondes, jSilsohylus, and Pindar, we find the cock, already mentioned, mider the proud name of Aleetor, as the usual companion of man. The fights between cocks became a striking example for poets as soon as the fowl was a familiar object. ' In the " Eumenides " of /Eschylus, Athena warns the Athenians against civil war as resembling the combats of cocks. Pindar compares the inglorious victories of a civil war to the victories of a barn-door fowl. And it is stated that Themistocles raised the courage of his army by remind- ing them how two fighting-cocks risk their lives, not for hearth and its penates, but for fame alone. When afterwards the public cock-fights, which are repre- sented on innumerable ancient monuments, were supposed to be derived from the above speech of Themistocles, it proves at least that cock-fighting was not thought as older than the Persian wars. The comic poets still call the bird the Persian bird.' * Darwin states that the fowl figured on some of the Babylonian cylinders, for Jlr. Layard had sent him an impression of these dating from the sixth or seventh centuries, and also on the Harpy tomb in Lycia about 600 B.C., from which fact he thinks that the fowl reached Europe somewhere about the sixth century B.C. The first actual reference in Western literature to the fowl occurs in the writings of Theognis and Aristophanes between 400 and 500 B.C. But fowls had evidently gone Eastward at an earlier date. Mention is made of the fowl in a Chinese encyclopceJia which is said to have been compiled 1,400 years before Christ, This earlier migration is to be easily understood from the geographical positions of China and India, much more favourably situated for intercommunication than was- India with the Western nations. It is also surprising that there is no mention on the Egyptian monuments of the fowl, which fact may be taken as proof that it was not then in that country, for these monuments are otherwise so full of the detads of ancient housekeeping on the Xile. There are to be seen flocks of tame geese being driven home from the pastures. They and their eggs are being carefully counted, but nowhere cocks- and hens ; and when Aristotle and Diodorus say that eggs were artificially hatched in Egypt by bm-ying them in dung, they must mean the eggs of geese and ducks, or refer to a later period than the Persian con- quest, which Diodorus seems to hint, for he commences his account of the hatching-ovens with these words ; ' The Egyptians inherited many customs relating to the breeding and rearing of animals from their forefathers, but other things they have invented, among which the most wonderful is the artificial hatching of eggs.' It is probable that by the time of the Christian era — that is, during the interregnum between the closing of the Canon of the Old Testament and the opening of that of the New Testament— the fowl had spread itself all over the western parts of Asia and the eastern parts of Europe, at any rate, though it was known m several parts of Western Europe. The reference to the crow- ing of the cock at the time of Peter's denial of our Lord cordd only have reference to the domestic fowl, and this is made in such a manner as to show that there was nothing remarkable in the crowing of the cock, but it was a sound heard daUy. We can assume, therefore, that the migration of the fowl into Syria and Eastern Europe took place within the six centuries prior to the advent of Christ, and that by the commencement of the Christian era it had become familiar, and one of the ordinary domestic animals, not merely in Greece, but also in Italy, Gaul, Spain, and Britain. Csesar found that cock-fighting was known to the ancient Britons, probably intro- * ' Wanderings of Plants and Animals,' by Victor Helm (London, 1S85), p. '243. 10 RACES OF DOMESTIC POULTRY duced by the Phoenicians, by which date in Italy domestic birds were bred chiefly for their flesh qualities. In the chapters dealing with the various races of poultry information is given as to distribution of indi- vidual breeds in more modem days, but our difficulty is as to ancient periods of the world's history. It would be interesting to trace the wanderings of the •different races of men, for by doing so we should be better able to understand the passing of the fowl from its original habitat to all parts of the earth, but that cannot be done here. Hehn says,* speaking of the domestic fowl : ' They may have come straight from Asia to the kindred nations of the South Bussian steppes and the Eastern slopes of the Carpathian Mountains, whose religion agreed with that of the other Iranian races, and some of whom already practised agriculture in the time of Herodotus ; or by way of the Greek colonies on the Black Sea ; or from Thrace to the tribes on the Danube ; or from Italy by way of the ancient com- mercial roads across the Alps ; or through Massilia to the regions of the Rhone and the Ehine ; or, finally, by several of these ways at once.' Although it is very difficult to trace the distribution * 'Wanderings of Plants and Animals,' by Victor Helm ^London, 1885), p. 247. of fowls, as there are so few actual records, in the following diagram we do so as far as our present know- ledge enables us to do so. Distribution of the Domestic Fowl. (■ Central r \ Asia '.Japan Smitl i -Turkey and Balkans Gurm=ih and ("Britain Malayan \ Archipelago (.America Britai 1 by Pluenioia f Britain Spain .^ I Netherlands- .Pcrsia-Greece- -Britain France— Britain Italy- Germany— Netherlands AuEtro-Hungary • America- Britain It will be seen that there were practically two great streams, one by way of Persia and Greece to Southern Europe, and the other by way of China, Central Asia, and Siberia to Eussia, Turkey and Eastern Europe. CHAPTER II EVOLUTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF BREEDS Present characters largely artificial— Effects of use and disuse— Habits of life— Cor- relative variability— Change of conditions— Food— Crossing— Other influences- Natural selection— Artificial selection— Modern breeding— Results of domestica- tion—Classification—Division of races— Choice of breed— Technical terms— Various forms of combs— Feather markings IN the previous chapter it is shown that originally all the races of fowls, of ducks, of geese, and of turkeys were respectively similar, and it is now our purpose to consider the causes which have pro- duced so large a number of races and sub-races. It is desirable in this connection to realize that the special ■characteristics and qualities of the domestic races of poultry are to a large extent artificial. The size of body and prolificacy, the colouring of plumage and special pecuharities met with in many varieties of domestic poultry, are absolutely unknown amongst wild birds. That being so, there must always be a tendency towards the original type in the first place, and in the du-ection of fresh developments in the second. The same forces are at work even amongst wild birds, though to a lesser degree. Later observa- tions of naturalists have proved that the process of evolution is one of continual change, and if this is true when birds and animals are living under more or less vmiform conditions, it is specially so with alteration of habits and variation of food, when they are brought into the service of man. Effects of Use and Disuse. — One of the first changes induced by domestication is due to the effects •of use and disuse of parts of the body. By studying the structure of our domestic animals it is found that there are sections of the body which apparently have no use at the present time, whilst there are others which are larger and more fully developed than in the wild progenitors. The explanation of these changes is that under one set of conditions there was a demand upon the system which is not needed under others, and it is very clearly seen that unless an organ or limb is used there must always be a tendency to diminution in size and development. Whereas, on the other hand, if used to a greater extent than had been the case before, the organ or limb grows in strength and in size. It is needless in this connection to give instances, for the fact is so self-evident that it need only be mentioned to be understood. The late Charles Darwin says : * ' It is notorious that increased use or action strengthens muscles, glands, sense organs, etc., and that disuse, on the other hand, weakens them. It has been experi- mentally proved by Eanke that the flow of blood is greatly increased towards any part which is performing work, and sinks again when the part is at rest. Con- sequently, if the work is frecjuent the vessels increase in size, and the part is better nourished.' Habits of Life. — The change of habits of life tends also towards variation, and in this respect tliere is a marvellous power of acclimatization in races of- poultry. It must be remembered that these races originated in a hot climate, and that distribution over the more temperate zones is almost entirely due to the action of man. Animals in their wild state have to seek for their own food, and expend a large amount of energy in so doing, which has the tendency to keep down size of body. Under domestication their needs are provided for, and thus there is always a disposition to increase of size in certain parts of the body. The question of acclimatization is one which has not been fully explained, but it appears to be evident that under new conditions the tendency is generally at first towards enfeeblement, due to strain upon the system. This may sometimes be scarcely discernible owing to better food-supphes, but it is in many cases evident to the observer. Nature, however, has a marvellous re- cuperative power, and within a comparatively short time the balance is restored, and frequently the change is beneficial in many directions, as seen below. Correlative Variability. — One of the most potent induenoes making for these changes is what is com- * ' Vaviation of Aiiioiiils and Plants under Domestication,' by Charles Darwin, F.R.S. (London, 1SS.5), vol. ii., p. '285. 12 RACES OF DOMESTIC POULTRY monly called ' correlative variability.' This is a most difficult question. Why one part of the body should be influenced by changes in another has never been completely explained. As Darwin says : * 'In cases of true correlative variation we are sometimes able to see the nature of the connection ; but in most cases it is hidden from us, and certainly differs in different cases. We can seldom say which of two correlative parts first varies and induces a change in the other, or whether the two are the effects of some common cause.' In this case mention need only be made of the relation between the egg-organs and the comb in f o^\'ls. In the wild bh'ds the comb is small, but under domestication it has very largely increased, which would appear to be due to the development of the egg-organs. This question is discussed fully in Chapter XYI. Change of Conditions. — Reference has already been made to the question of changed conditions. The bringing of birds under domestication means there is not the same strain upon the system, nor yet so great an amount of exercise, which undoubtedly have a great influence in the direction of variability. The material which would otherwise be utilized in main- taining the body in health must be used in some other direction, and the absence of need for exercise means that modifications are largely induced. This is found in every branch of animal and plant life, and if it were not so the needs of man could not be met, for we can- not forget that if we depended upon animals and plants produced in the natural manner it would be impossible for the present population of the world to be supported. We do not know how many acres would be required for the maintenance of each individual, but intensity of cultivation is an absolute necessity. Changes of climate are a very potent cause of varia- tion. It would take a considerable amount of space to give in detail all the observations made in this direction, but those who have been concerned in the export or import of fowls from one country to another know that it is very difficult indeed to maintain the original characteristics in different climates. Tliat is seen even, say, in transferring birds from England to America or Australia, where the climatic conditions, though dis- tinctly different, are not extremely so. The effect of climate and soil upon production receives consideration in the companion volume,! and need not be discussed further. Food. — Food explains much in the way of variation, and especially in these days, when the requirements of each country means that foods have to be introduced from other lands. It would be erroneous to say that any grain was indigenous to Britain, for instance, * 'Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication,' by Charles Uarwin, F.R.S.irjondon. 1S861, vol. ii., p. 312. t ' Poultry-Keeping ns an Industry for Farmers and Cottagers,' by Edward Brown, F.L.S. (London, lim), pp. 36-42. originally no grain was grown here, the inhabitants living upon native fruits and such birds and animals as they could shoot. But cultivation for a long period of time, correlative with the acclimatiza- tion of animals, would lead us to say that oats, wheat, and barley are native to this country. Therefore these, being employed as food for poultry, would probably not have the same influence as when maize, which is not grown in the United Kingdom, is used. There is also the question of the richness of the food, and it cannot be doubted that food has a very great influence upon variations. If a family of fowls has been kept under one set of conditions and fed more or less upon the same class of food, and some members thereof are removed elsewhere and fed upon diff'erent foods alto- gether, it is only natm-al to expect that variations will be accentuated. Crossing. — One of the most important influences which make for variation is crossing. Birds in which there has been a cross always show a greater tendency towards uncertainty of type, and as most of our breeds have rightly or wrongly — we are bound to say more rightly than wrongly — received an infusion of alien blood within a few generations, this is liable to show itself, especially when the conditions under which the birds are kept are changed. Perhaps some reader may say that this bears out the contention that when varia- tions occur in chickens it is an indication that there is impurity of race, but we must point out that it is- wonderful how long an influence of this kind wiU re- main present in the system, perhaps showing itself at a most unexpected time. If any breeder of poultry expects that m buying either birds or eggs he is securing something that is absolutely pure, using this term in the chemical sense, he is anticipating what cannot be looked for. As Darwin says:* 'How long this influence will last depends on the diff'erence in the strength or prepotency of transmission in the two parent forms, on their actual amount of difference, and on the nature of the conditions of life to which the crossed offspring are exposed. But we must be careful not to confine these cases of reversion to characteristics which were given by a cross with those in which characteristics originally common to both parents, but lost at some former period, reappear. For such char- acteristics may recur after an almost indefinite number of generations.' Other Influences.— Other influences also have increased the tendency to variation. The elevation of the ground upon which a race is kept will affect the size of body. We see in the case of cattle and slreep that the larger and fleshier races are almost without exception found upon the rich pastures of plains and valleys, whilst the smaller, hardier animals are almost entirely * ' Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication," by Charles Darwin (London, 1885), vol. ii., p. il. SELECTION AND BREEDING 13 met with in hilly districts. Were it necessary, proofs could be given, but the fact is so fully recognised that they are not required, more than to say that transfer- ance of mountain sheep to the lower-lying lands will modify them considerably in the course of a generation or two, and vice versa. It may, therefore, be reason- ably assumed that similar effects are produced with poultry, except where counteracted by artificial selec- tion. In respect to coloration of plumage, the law to which the late Mr. Herbert Spencer gave the name of ' survival of the fittest ' has had a potent influence in fixing the colour of races, owing to the fact that the birds whose plumage most nearly conformed to their surroundings, and consequently could avoid observation by their enemies, would be perpetuated, and survive in the struggle for existence. Natural Selection. — From what has been stated it is evident that the natural tendency to variation has been, and is, much greater under domestication than when the birds are in a wild state ; in fact, that a pro- cess of natural selection has been at work throughout the centuries, and is increased by change of conditions and food. When the fowls had become acclimatized, had adapted themselves to their new conditions, there would be a strongly marked development of one type, deter- mined to a considerable extent by the ' survival of the fittest,' referred to above. This would not be restricted to plumage, but would apply to size and structure of body. Hence we have an explanation why at one time nearly every country or district had in their fowls a common type of remarkable uniformity. Were the same chmatic and soil conditions applied to a wide area^ the variations from that type would be few, but in diversified countries like Britain they are much greater. The fowls called ' barn-door ' or ' commune ' served the purpose until increase of population and of needs com- pelled other methods, and man, for his own purposes, adopted what is known as artificial selection. To the former is due the similarity of types met with over large areas in Asia, in Eastern and Southern Europe, and in America. Artificial Selection.— When fowls were brought under the control of man a new influence came into play, to which the name ' artificial selection ' is given— that is, the arbitrary mating of birds with a view to perpetua- tion of specific characters and qualities. In earlier days such selection would be necessarily limited, and would affect only to a slight extent coloration of plumage, as the variations in that direction would be comparatively few. But with changed conditions, as we have ah-eady seen, marked differences would be speedily apparent, and when the owners selected for killing those not required as breeding stock, they would choose for that purpose such as did not show the special characters or •qualities required. In this manner a beginning was made for the increase of distinct types. It is probable that at first selection was in two directions : first, for those qualities which made for success in fighting — namely, courage, strength of bone, size of wing, and general vigour ; and, second, quiet disposition, abun- dance of flesh, egg production, and general acceptation of the restraints of more civilized conditions. These du'ections are antagonistic, and development would not he equal. That named first was the earliest. When breeding became more intensive, and there entered into the question personal predilections for specific forms, these changes would be accentuated. It must, however, be recognised that natural selection and the variations resultant from distribution into the various countries of the world was the basis, and that without such variations artificial selection would have been practically impotent. It may thus be stated that the former has produced a few general types, and that from these the vast number of races and sub-races were evolved, following upon minor changes due to transference from the primary environment to others. Modern Breeding.-^Whilst poultry, therefore, have been known and kept for domestic purposes since long before the Christian era, it is only within the last century that there has been careful attention paid to breeds, with the exception of Game fowls kept for fighting purposes. These fowls were handed down through long centuries. Could we but trace the pedigree of our Game fowls, it is probable that they could show a descent which would put to shame the genealogical roll of the bluest- blooded noble of Europe. A Saxon or Xorman an- cestry would be as nothing to it. But that is without our most careful research. With the exception of these Game fowls, until a couple of hundred years ago fowls were all classified together, and, save in one or two instances, we find no attempt at description. Even these are of the most meagre character. It is true that Columella, the Koman writer, speaks of fowls found in Italy with five toes, and gives a slight outline of their appearance ; but even that leaves much to be desired. Descriptive dealing with domestic animals in bygone days does not seem to have been thought of. Nor can we wonder at that state of things. Man approached new species as we do new varieties, and his mind was filled with other and, to him, more momentous questions. It is interesting to trace the advent of new breeds, and fortunately, so far as these last two centuries are concerned, the writings of those who gave attention to domestic poultry enable us to do this to some extent. But the absence of detail limits our powers, and there is not nearly the same information afforded as in pigeon literature. It would appear to be true that, until ' fancy ' enters into any pursuit of this kind, such questions as external characteristics do not seem to be thought of, nor even internal qualities, so much as is 14 RACES OF DOMESTIC POULTRY now the case. This question is dealt with in the chapters treating upon the different Eaces of Poultry. One of the earliest books dealing with fowls was Sir Anthony Fitzherbert's ' Boke of Husbandry,' pub- lished in 1532, but nothing is said as to breeds. A hundred years later (a.d. 1631) was published Ger- vasse Markhani's ' Cheap and Good Husbandry for the Well-ordering of all Beasts and Fowls,' in which prominence is given to domestric poultry, but only a brief description is made of the Game and the ' dung- hill cocke.' As to the latter, it is said that his colour should be red. In Gent's ' Systema Agrioulturae,' pub- lished in 1675, the keeping of fowls for profit is advo- cated, and advice given as to management, but it contains no description of breeds. In 1708 was issued Mortimer's 'Whole Art of Husbandry,' wherein is mentioned the fact that several sorts existed, but he does not say what they were. Early in the eighteenth century a French work was published, ' The Art of Hatching and Bringing up Domestic Fowls of all Kinds, at any Time of the Year, either by Means of Hot-beds, or that of Common Fire,' by M. de Keaumur, of the Eoyal Academy of Science at Paris, dealing chiefly with artificial incubation. Our copy is an English translation,* but whilst several distinct kinds of fowls are referred to, no list is given. In 1815 was published ' A Practical Treatise on Breeding, Bearing, and Fattening all Kinds of Domestic Poultry,' etc., by Bonington Moubray, which had prob- ably more influence than any previous work in the development of poultry-keeping upon regular lines. Between 1815 and 1850 nine editions were published, and a revised edition was issued in 1854. It was the first attempt to give poultry anything like the prominence deserved, and every praise is due to the author, though his book leaves much to be desired, and is very sparse in some of its details. The illustrations are very crude, but give us an idea of what the birds were like at that time. The races mentioned numbered as follows, though it is evident others were known : fowls, 12 ; ducks, 4 ; geese, 1 ; turkeys, 3. In ' The Cocker,' by W. Sketchley,t upwards of twenty varieties of the Game fowls are recorded. ' Poultry, their Breeding, Bearing, Diseases, and General Manage- ment,' by Walter E. Dickson, was published in 1838, and marks a distinct advance on all works dealing with this subject up to that date, although in respect to breeds, information is very scanty. The races named by him number : fowls, 19 ; ducks, 3 ; geese, 3 ; turkeys, 3. Dixon's work was published in 1850, and he was apparently the first to attempt a division of the breeds, but entirely in respect to size of body. He names the following number of breeds : fowls, 22 ; ducks, 7 ; geese, 5 ; turkeys, 4. The year 1853 saw the first attempt to deal with poultry in an exhaustive and complete manner, worthy of the subject. This * London, 1750. t London. 1811. was Wingfield and Johnson's ' Poultry Book,' which, though largely devoted to advocacy of the Shanghais, other varieties are fully dealt with. The number of breeds named are : fowls, 34 ; ducks, 8 ; geese, 4 ; turkeys, 5. It will be seen, therefore, that within fifty years the number of recognised races of fowls had increased from twelve to thirty-four ; of ducks from four to eight ; of geese from one to four ; and of turkeys from three to five. The majority of these additions were due to the importation of races previously unknown in Britain, but existent elsewhere. It was not until the rise of the exhibition system in the fifties that the attempt to introduce new forms by combination of existing breeds was made. The earlier steps were in the direction of fixing and improving- those races ah-eady known. As we see later, in the doing so a great amount of harm resulted. Perhaps, however, that was to be expected. Results of Domestication. — Generally speak- ing, the effects of brmging poultry under the control of man are seen in four directions. First : Size of Body. — The Jungle-fowl of India (G. ferrugineus) is a small bird, weighing about 3i pounds, but becomes heavier when brought under domestication, even though not selected for enhanced size. It does now, however, develop much beyond 6 pounds, unless breeding with that object in view is adopted. Nearly all our larger races of fowls have come directly or indirectly from Eastern Asia, and it is evident that breeding for size has been an objective in China and the Malayan Archipelago. Small fowls are also bred in those countries. As a result, we have several breeds which reach 11 to 12 pounds in fuUy- grown stock. In ducks and geese the same results are apparent, but in turkeys, as explained already, size has been reduced. Second : Fecunditij. —The wild hen forms, as a rule, two nests in the course of the year, producing from twenty-two to twenty-six eggs. In aU domesticated races there is a marked increase in prolificacy, more especially in certain breeds. Individual hens are known to produce upwards of 200 eggs per aimum, and breed averages of 150 are by no means uncommon. The influences which have led to that result are : supply of food which stimulates the egg-organs, selec- tion of those hens as breeding stock which have proved the best layers, and removal of the eggs as they are laid. The last named is probably the most potent. The object of a hen in laying is to perpetuate the race, and removal of the eggs postpones the development of the brooding instinct, inducing her to produce more eggs, as in the case of canaries and other caged birds. It is further true that changed conditions often induce increase of egg production, more especially where birds are transported from South to North. Nearly all migratory birds in Northern latitudes lay in RESULTS OF DOMESTICATION AND CLASSIFICATION 15 the colder areas, and it is found that many breeds brought from Southern Asia to Europe are more productive than in their native habitat. Third: Suspension of the Maternal Instinct. — A considerable number of races of domestic poultry are unreliable or non-sitters. It would appear that the primary cause of suspension of the maternal instinct is due to breeding from the most prolific layers, -with retardment, in the first place, of broodiness, followed by suspension. The disuse of any function or any part of the body leads to its diminution. Fotirth : General Enfeehlement, which is the penalty we have to pay for breeding under unnatural condi- tions, for inbreedhig to fix defined characters, and for use as stock birds of those specimens which, in respect to vigour of body, are the least fit, even though they may show the racial type to the highest degree. It should be realized that the first three results named are added qualities of an arbitrary nature, and can only be maintained by constant care in selection and breed- ing. They are rapidly lost if artificial selection is not continued. As the late Professor Drummond has so well pointed out,* ' The highest part is the latest added part, and the latest added part is the least secured part.' This subject is discussed more fully when dealing with the effects of reversion (Chapter XYII.). Classification. — There are four methods which may be adopted in classifying the races of poultry, namely : 1. Size of body. 2. Coloration of plumage. 3. Country of origm. 4. Economic quahties. The method first named is necessary to divide those which are too diminutive for useful purposes from the practical breeds, and to indicate + such as are valuable for egg production and flesh properties respectively. The second method is only essential to recognition of external characters, and is of lesser importance. The third is of interest as showing the origin and history of breeds, and has been adopted in the following chapters for purposes of effective division. The fourth is of greatest value to the practical poultry-breeder, to whom ' handsome is as handsome does.' What he requires to know is whether the birds are capable of yielding the greater profit as egg-producers, as flesh-growers, or by combination of the two. Excess in either direction means reduction in the other, although it is possible, as will be shown, that by sacrifice of a little on one side substantial gain may be made on the other. Economic qualities are the final court of appeal, and below the races are classified in accordance therewith. As already mentioned, the use or disuse of any part * ' The Ascent of Man,' by Henry Drummond (Loudon, 1894), p. 173. t See Cliapter XVII. of the body must have an effect upon the structure. It is necessary, therefore, in classifying the races of fowls in accordance with their economic qualities, to consider how the body is modified as a result of special developments. The method of lining a fowl — that is,, determining its productive qualities by general type — is- fully explained in the companion volume,* where are given diagrams showing how the qualities are deter- mined, and the reader is referred to that work. But for our present purpose it is necessary to state the con- siderations which help us to appraise the value of our breeds of poultry. These must be mentioned briefly. Egrj Production. — In this case the organs con- cerned, the ovaries and oviduct, are in the postei'ior part of the body, which is, as a consequence, large. The influence upon the comb is explained in Chapter XVII., but it may here be stated that big combs and heavy sterns go with prolificacy. It is not enough, however, to regard number of eggs produced, im- portant though that is. Some recorded results are- given in ' Poultry-Keepmg as an Industry.'t We must- consider the time of year when they are laid. A hen which yielded only 100 eggs per annum, if she laid them from October to March, would be more profitable than another laying 150, who did not commence opera- tions until the last-named month. It may be here- explained that whilst all breeds can be induced, more- or less, to lay in winter, those which are best in that- respcct are the General Purpose races, producing tinted- shelled eggs. The next consideration is the size of egg. Our market demands for the best trade that a dozen eggs shall weigh not less than 24 ounces. Reference- to the tables given in the above work \ will show that in hens' eggs these varied from 19 j to 29 ounces per dozen from adult birds, and the weights would be- sUghtly less from pullets. Further, whilst there is a difference in the flavour of eggs produced by the- different varieties, apart from the influence of food and soil, this has no appreciable value at present. And, finally, the coloration of shell, which is discussed at- lengthy in the previous work. Only one point need here be mentioned, namely, that as a rule the smaller hens of any given breed or variety are usually the- better layers. The above remarks apply mainly to- fowls, as the other species are not generally kept as egg-producers. Table Properties. — The edible portions of fowls- consist chiefly of the breast and leg muscles. The heart, liver, and outer muscles of the gizzard are used for food, but need not concern us, as they do not vary to the same extent as the motor muscles on the sternum and thighs. In the wild species the breast muscles are the greater, owing to the use of the wings in flight, but under domestication the tendency is to * ' Poultry-Keeping as an Industry for Farmers and Cottagers,' by Edward Bromi, P.L.S. (London, 1904), pp. 28-29. t Ibid; P- 23. J Ihid., pp. 23-24. § Ibid., p. 166. 16 RACES OF DOMESTIC POULTRY diminution of these and increase of the leg muscles by exercise, as the birds walk more than they fly, which explains why, in the races which have not been selected for breast qualities, and more especially the heavier Asiatic types, the leg flesh is highly developed. Where l)irds do not use their wings, as is the case with the great majority of our fowls — at any rate where cooks are not used for fighting — the muscles upon the breast can only be maintained and increased by selection. In respect to quality, there is a considerable difference in the flesh. The leg or thigh muscle is harder, closer in texture, darker in colour, and contams j^ro rata a greater amount of sinew, whereas the breast muscle is softer, lighter in colour, and has scarcely any sinew, as it consists of two layers worked by the clavicle, or merry-thought. Hence those birds are better for table purposes in which the breast has attained the highest and the legs the least development. In addition there is considerable difference in the nature of the flesh, as in some breeds it is hard and close, in others soft, thus determining the quality and flavour. On nearly all European markets white-fleshed fowls are preferred, but in America yellow is usually regarded with the greater favour. A further point is the weight of bone, which, together with the feathers, is the most expen- sive part of the body to produce. Heavy-boned fowls requu-e a longer period of growth to attain kilUng size than if the frame and limbs are fine in bone. The latter are, therefore, to be preferred. In ' Poultry- Keeping as an Industry,'* a table is given showing the relative proportions of meat and of bone and offal on a number of races at six months old. And, finally, quiet birds fatten much the better, producing a greater increase of flesh than those which are active and rest- less in temperament. Maternal Instinct. — It is necessary to keep in view whether a race can be depended upon as sitters and mothers. The instinct is suspended, wholly or partly, in many races, which fact must be recognised when making selection of breeds for practical purposes. In the majority of cases those hens which produce the greatest number of eggs are such as are unreliable or non-sitters, and with increased prolificacy in any breed the tendency will be to delay or suspend the brooding instinct. Our method of classification, which we introduced many years ago, and which has been largely adopted, is to divide the races of poultry for practical purposes in accordance with their economic qualities. The , following is the division : Fowls. 1. Laying or non-sitting (egg-producing) races. 2. Table (flesh-producing) races. 3. General purpose (egg and flesh) races. 4. Ornamental races. * ' Poultry-Keeping as an Industry for Farmers and Cottagers,' by Edward Brown, P.L.S. (London, 1904), p. 25. 1. Laying (egg-producing) races. 2. Table (flesh-producing) races. Geese and Turkeys. All are bred for meat properties and not for eggs. The subjoined tables afford at a brief glance the special qualities of each of the breeds noted in the following chapters, in which, however, are not included the purely ornamental races. CLASSIFICATION OF FOWLS. Laying or Non-sitting Breeds. In these races the maternal instinct is almost, if not entirely, suspended. They are generally medium in size of body, active in habit, quick in growth, and, without exception, layers of white-shelled eggs, which, however, vary greatly in size. Ancona. Landhen, Danish. Andalusian. Leghorn. Bearded Thurmgian. Magyar. Bergische Grower. Minorca. Brabant. Moeven. Braekal. Pavloff. Campine. PoHsh. Gastilian. Kamelsloh. Crested Dutch. Eedcap. Du Mans. Russian Dutch. Frieslaud. Schlotterkamm. Hamburgh. Scotch Grey. Herve. Spanish, Black. Houdan. Transylvanian Naked Neck. Lakenfelder. Voldarno. Table Breeds. The breeds which excel in table qualities are cliietiy larger medium or large in size of body, and the softer the flesh the less active are they in habit. In several cases they are fairly quick in growth, but not so rapid as the non-sitters, which are preferred as milk chickens for that reason. They are in the majority of cases good sitters and mothers, the exceptions being among the French races. Nearly all save the Game, Indian Game, JMalay, and Aseel, lay white-sheUed eggs. Antwerp Brahma. Aseel. Black Sumatra. Breda. l^resse. Caussade. Courtes Pattes. CreveccEur. Dorking. Du Mans. Estanes. Game. Indian (Cornish) Game. La Fleche. ]\Ialay. Mantes. Orloff. Padovana. Sussex. General Purpose Breeds. The definition here adopted is intended to designate those races in which the qualities are equally balanced without excessive development either for laying or CHARACTERISTICS OF FOWLS 17 table purposes. As a rule they are large in size of body, but are heavier in bone, and consequently slower in growth, than either of the two previous classes. What they lose in egg production, as compared with the non-sitters, they gain in table qualities, and what they lose in meat properties, as compared with the table breeds, they gain in egg production. Almost without exception they are good sitters and mothers, and layers of tinted-shelled eggs, and also by nature are good winter layers. Ardenne. - Java. Barbezieus. Langshan. Bourbourg. Malines. Brahma. Orpington. Cochin. Owl-bearded Dutch. Dominique. <^lymouth Eock. Drente. Polverara. FaveroUes. Prat. Flemish Cuckoo. Ehode Island Bed. French Cuckoo. Wyandotte. Huttegem. The following tables give in a convenient form the characteristics of the different races of fowls : Characteristics. LAYING Tinted-shelled Eggs. Yellow or Cream. Antwerp Brahma. Aseel. Bourbourg. Brahma. Bruges (very light). Cochin. Dominique. Estaires. FaveroUes. Flemish Cuckoo. Game, English. Huttegem. Indian (Cornish) Game. Java. Langshan. Malay. Orlofi: Orpington. Plj'mouth Rock. Rhode Island Red. Wyandotte. CoLOUK OF Flesh and Skin. Antwerp Brahma. Ardenne. Barbezieux. Bearded Thuringian. Bergische Grower. Black Sumatra. Brabant. Breda. Bresse. Caumont. Caussade. Courtes Pattes. Crested Dutch. Crevecoeur. Dorking. Du Mans. Estaires. FaveroUes. Flemish Cuckoo. French Cuckoo. Game (some varieties). Herve. Houdan. Huttegem. La Fleche. Lakenfelder. Landhen, Danish. Magyar, White. Mahnes. Minorca, White. Moeven. Orpington, Buff, White, Spangled. Owl-bearded Dutch. Padovana. Polverara. Prat. Eamelsloh. Russian Dutch. Schlotterkamm. Scotch Grey. Sussex. Anoona. Bourbourg. Brahma. Cochin. Dominique. Game (some varieties). Indian (Cornish) Game. ■