ban Pet ae tise Bi Hee Tite >| cee ya i iF q i i ees ~ i ei ie a i i ; th reiyigls hialabt u: eid i yf Cer! im uih cone REPORT OF THE TWENTY-SIXTH MEETING BRITISH 1 Buch ETION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE; HELD AT CHELTENHAM IN AUGUST 1856. —_— LONDON: JOHN MURRAY, ALBEMARLE STREET 1857. PRINTED BY RICHARD TAYLOR AND WILLIAM FRANCIS, RED LION COURT, FLEET STREET. CONTENTS. Page Osysects and Rules of the Association ........sscscsesseeeceseeeeceeeeees XVii Places of Meeting and Officers from commencement ..........0+0.000 XX MMERMMREE ATSOCCOWNG 05205 sclyas sateen pares: saasasasc sCvspadvasvaeseassncencsese, SOI Table of Council from commencement ............seeceeceseeeeeeseeceeres XXIV Sree Fata UCIE Toto t cp aei<) ap « sennietnevnes Dr. J. H. Grapsronz on some Dichromatic Phenomena among Solutions, and the means of representing them. ..........-++sseee ree eerer tere nseeees Mr. W. BR. Grove on the Stratified Appearance of the Electrical Discharge. . Sir W. 8. Harris on the Law of Electrical and Magnetic Force.........--- Mr. J. C. Maxwetz on the Unequal Sensibility of the Foramen Centrale to Light of different Colours .........--.. seer sees nese reece tenn e etree on a Method of Drawing the Theoretical Forms of Faraday’s Lines of Force without Calculation ............6- eee nese teeter eees on the Theory of Compound Colours with reference to Mixtures of Blue and Yellow Light..........-.. sees sect ee ence nee Mr. James Nasmytu on the Form of Lightning .........-.-..- sees eres af ee PoweExt on Fresnel’s Formule for Reflected and Refracted DR Bate iceln jeans cid > Weim NRE + umabe cueie “peatetit Men ELE EO Mr. W. Symons on a Modification of the Maynooth Cast Iron Battery .....- Professor W1LL1aAM Tuomson on Dellman’s Method of observing Atmospheric IN TOM oc ine 55 Rey. W. Mrrcuett and Prof, J. Tennant on a Series of Descriptive Labels for Mineral Collections in Public Institutions. ........:seeeeeee re eeeee 57 Mr. Witt1am Opie on the Alkaline Emanations from Sewers and Cess- PR Me inca hk cheery alg to eeurebry Sk berorti ii Asetes tro settee 57 on the Detection of Antimony for Medico-Legal PGE MMSER LE. sfareceult: Fdmrmrldekroe As te eine el: he rigs teens 57 Mr. W. R. Pearson on the Compounds of Chromium and Bismuth ........ 58 Mr. Cuartes Poorzy on Engraving Collodion Photographs by means of Fluoric Acid Gas oo... cee eee eee eee ee teen eee renee 58 Rev. C. PrrrcHarp on the Gases of the Grotto del Cane .........---+ 000: 58 Professor A. VorLcKER on the Corrosive Action of Smoke on Building Stones 58 on the Composition of American Phosphate of Lime. . 58 soon Basic Phosphates of Lime .....-+++s-+e+seese 58 Mr. W. Svxes Warp on Albuminized Collodion ..........+++seevereeees 58 Mr. P. J. Worstey on a New Process for Making and Melting Steel........ 59 Mr. Henry Wricut on the Use of the Gramme in Chemistry .......----- 60 GEOLOGY. Lieutenant AyTon on Gold in India...........-.. cece etree rete et eees 60 Mr. Wriu14m H. Barty on Fossils from the Crane, Jeni es Porch deaieths 60 Mr. J. 8. BowErsanx on the Origin of Siliceous Deposits in the Chalk For- Sra So ae nad Han. Seen motrin tear Tt fOr oar Wyane (so Rey. P. B. Bropre on some New Species of Corals in the Lias of Gloucester- shire, Worcestershire, and Warwickshire ........+++s-ssesreeercreees 64 —_____ on a New Species of Pollicipes in the Inferior Oolite near Stroud, in Gloucestershire ......... cece eect eee eee teen eee eeeenee 64 Professor James Buckman on the Basement Beds of the Oolite.........-.- 64 on the Oolite Rocks of the Cotteswold Hills .... 65 Mr. R. Ernermes on the Igneous Rocks of Lundy and the Bristol District.. 65 Professor Harkness on some New Fossils from the ancient Sedimentary Rocks of Ireland and Scotland ....... 0. cece cece etre teen eee teeta eens 65 on the Jointing of Roéks. 7)... 06. eee eee tee 65 on the Lignites of the Giant’s Causeway and the Isle of Mull 66 Vili CONTENTS. Page Professor Hennessy on the Relative Distribution of Land and Water as aflect- ing Climate at different Geological Epochs ...........+.+-seeeeeeeeeees Dr. H. B. HornBECK on some Minerals from the Isle of St. Thomas ........ Mr. Epwarp Hutz on the South-easterly Attenuation of the Oolitic, Liassic, Triassic, and Permian Formations s.05in. > hisses ci miciats e+ rele «a ofekeds aieinye Mr. J. Bertr Juxes on the Alteration of Clay-slate and Gritstone into Mica- schist and Gneiss by the Granite of Wicklow, &.........::seeeseeeues Mr. J. E. Lez on some Fossil Fishes from the Strata of the Moselle ........ on an Elephant’s Grinder from the Cerithium Limestone Mr. M. MocerinGe on the Time required for the formation of “ Rolled Stones” Mr. CHaritEs Moore on the Skin and Food of Ichthyosauri and Teleosauzi. . on the Middle and Upper Lias of the West of England Sir R. I. Murcutson on the Bone Beds of the Upper Ludlow Rock, and base OtinesOld Red. Sandshonege cust eye serge acces uns sister's ichst saahmettee te een Mr. Ropert MusHeT on an ancient Miner’s Axe recently discovered in the Forest of Dean. In a letter to RicnHarp BEamisH, Hsq................. Professor OWEN on the Dichodon cuspidatus, from the Upper Eocene of the Isle of Wight and Hordwell, Hants .............0. 0c ccseu ec eeebe cease on some Additional Evidence of the Fossil Musk-Ox (Bubalus moschatus) from the Wiltshire Drift........... 0c cscs c eect eee eeeees ——_—_—_—_——— on a New Species of Anoplotherioid Mammal (Dichobune Ovinum, Ow.) from the Upper Eocene of Hordwell, Hants, with Remarks on the Genera Dichobune, Xiphodon, and Microtherium,..........+++++++ ———_—_———- on a Fossil Mammal (Stereognathus Ooliticus) from the Stones- HE GUS NOs tar cipaBoes Ome oo4 ODE tddndooratatine Mantag ne asta cr ———__———— on the Scelidotherium leptocephalum, a Megatherioid Qua- Groped ona Naas) abe noo: 9 0,0.Ses slemeiie aan Sage te ‘purpy *d 38) ‘sua “bsg ‘suey AoUS * ccocveceveccccseconsccosssssomareTAl JONG Ploy -fopoy[ JO WEA MLL “beg Bueng uyor f *aqumseSpa Juno jo Pe OL ‘stad “Med ourqsud "WL tS } ORT SAT yaquio}dag ‘MODSVTD ‘a'TT ‘OPIN *d “£ ‘soy ‘bso ‘TPPYT morpuy b's*a'at ‘soysmaig Plaed, 4S ‘TSW oousey5 pioT yerouay soley J **°**** sgn ANVETVCVEUE LO SINOUVA MUL 4 atateioiaie © wee neleie giaiotklecafaln:e(aiaDsse's sevieseesee Trouug “Ae £19 A » ; f ‘bsg ‘19180 HOA 'S"W bsg ‘uosspoH qdosor ; CAE a al Gest ‘go NSny ‘MVHONINUTE sa TaT SMO WSTHV 0340, SOOO ts nf “bso ‘e109 uygor ‘a’ “uosuTqoy WL AW ML Piow Gora” “y" ‘ ° 5 Py perite Soba al bres Ge ae ree Tynounred Jo He Sen meg ee TUNOOUVH NONUGA “AM ATH ML 3 Feit eee -. . ee eee eeses cress enrearny® i “bso ‘Aqjag uyor xnvepud pees ¢ A es “Sia “VI ‘uoysUTOL Lossajord Cars wad Sag id : ggst ‘os IsnSny “ANA T-NO-ATLSVOMTN THe ROIIN EG. CLANS Gc ee ee Re sees eee gn OO Re qanooae H mwoulaA "AL AOW WL onten! Pe a 6 5 6 eo uonureey cael STOR peace oS aa ‘meyang Jo doystel OL 2°S'O' “SW ANVIVATNOH LION 40 AAC AL *jood Ae eaters GWsiar evsrererelaatieiiiers)=\© Faces Sinise ceereceessego erat TPMOUAL AN “AOU PA el Ne ine Mane eae a Z ‘ Kor *sorq “ayVAA "N Udesogs "Ts reerereegun “Sd “Wed ‘noose Aoty op did AS a ae «8 peo RnR jo Aqisaaata() oy} JO OTIA9 Sa ae poeta ca a xmas ey emog'g ‘uoued uyor ‘Sid “S'T'd ‘WOIMION 5° doystg oyLJ -ueyg “SOL “sara ‘NOLONITUNE LO TUVA OL sbsqy Suapuaao0yy “A * rong “Cy ‘preyoud ‘0 “fr ‘sora SW ‘gmaqhuog *d “AM “A “gest ‘gg ysn3ny “TOLSIUg oy OSH eqn tuagned aR es 8 we ‘a W P aieriavaielalere (aie eee STL Tuoyduueyqa0N JO smbav At eo voy OST al emo'd ‘“ANMOCGSNVT AO SIODUVIN UL “gird “PAT TOssayord "AO Seva idhiis.s wiavetetecesch samo me.ne se S ® A tom “gral TOMOTAN AN “AOL Ewe) "CES or gondny ‘x17800 oy) ‘puvpadl yo jwhor *no1ysy “uoyMeH WL “™” Ris) Mel ciatete\eais.= pis eye.e/arebje.eie 0° Mae *. 2% ‘Sv Wa eord ‘UMO}ULUIXO qunoostA eaceensrenne . ‘ait axOT1TT LSOAOUd "ATW aud “pest ‘8 soquiazda ‘younaNia “op S'wl ‘908 ‘Wostqoy MOL pits Bis ninietsyaip omic * +s eq “MOSUIGON "UW WL AOU | eee eee ee eee aus ha ee aes a oe Sra ‘ Ean eee > 0 O4 - cigia‘w'a)eintuse @ hYe.araie 674,00 ‘IQ Sowa ‘yaqysmoig, pied mg (« ‘ ‘ on ca RTS wal saqio,y IOssajord : = : Toda “Loa ANVASINS TIVONOGAVN ‘L UIs gud ‘TMOTAN “AN RO ie eae en ys an ee A covees garg TOC u0z]8 wt "Ses8l “su aung ‘aD aIAagNVOD ‘so est ow Tl ‘Mojsue HT LOSBIJOLT “AW sid ciceieistete s.ais elale ews) ='< “oR qesor yomouonsy “S'H'al ‘Any “9 ‘sodA Cond’ A ow W MOIMDaaS WV CV ‘AGW OWL . hecenve sy xr py FIMO LOSsaJOld *AdYW ecengucweccene eececncresee 90g "1099 ‘said “oud POMaTTAL "A *A0%L 4 ; “zest ‘61 aung ‘axorxO ; oor 30 Teed sear oaopong e207 cocci 9g tag id “SA TNE A) «9g ogra “Sw ANVIIONG “A A OL “soa “Sad “V'W ‘sd JOBSOJOLT L wvaceceeeceeceerrerees gion “Sa a “V" Ane *TE81 (Zg xaquiaydog HHO X Sede Ae Sant Ske ume S SOM SRY eS eA au { on gna “Sa “TOC ‘MVITIAZLIA TUVE Md “saluvLayoas 1vV901 *SLNAGISSUd-JSIA *SLNAGISadd *qUIWIGDUOWUULOD) SPE WOT “SOLIBIOLDO§ [voy pus ‘syuopiserg-orA ‘squopIsatd Yj “UOryeLoOss Vy ysyug ey} Jo Buyooy JO SoTL, Pus saov[_ ot} Surmoys aquy, “T SO OD ODL SD ODDEOC OR TS Licht dispel ppl | Song 'saqd0.t "df 1Ossojorg error gt A “CW ‘uosI[y ‘a "M IOSsajolg ‘ysinquipa ‘ase “bea ‘poy, sourer jo Ayisz9ATa) 243/30 Tediound “a s'a'd'A “aq'q ‘aeq ugor ‘aoy A10A ‘ocst ‘tg Ame ‘HOOSNICH pateecs “ak deniers twee “OP S'e sig “S"y'ad TO" a “jaeg ‘ounqstag ‘yy semoyy, AIG YeroMAR [crest eee e steer eres ee eeees epmarpay 4g ‘preuoary ‘TR ITS Wa “WIN Purpey sossajorg ‘aa ) 1121 “OU'S'U' A ‘(qe1suey- aonenp pI0T) arog pled ‘uo IYSny (4g pue OyeATeS +49 Jo aSaT[OD pena ayy. jo [edroung be eee pretersesessess sour Grog “Ey ‘Araqasoy jo peg UL | “a BT ‘Sa “OTT “HM “UALSMaUa GIAVC UIS ee eben eeee Se ee) DOES. 17.5 ef “TON qae0q3%9 JO [eq og, gembanitae shat neuen oa on gene RARE JO JSOAOIG pO] 94} *UOFT WS ‘bsq ‘soueyo somes = Wa OVW ‘STEM JOId "AON SL OTT AH “loqsmorg pravq | 7, ete ASAE siarlate2 ae |AMM E EON rd re 6h ‘CW Vhs “opel 1 Ch: (e/a pete eeeeeerenenguy tgag &g sc ee Papen ar ae oo Re: “6F8I “CI aaquiaydag ‘WVHONIWEIG : H SITM Wea | ...... terre on Opoig “all “Weg ‘eq Weqoy ag ‘WOR, suse | SVwaACVIWN “ad ‘NOSNISOU ‘UL ‘AAU OUL . . ‘ N'U ‘Tepuny urezdep [| ....... seveeeees aguas ‘LosoqorM\ PLOT ONT, “AqmoxTETY Jo [VG OTL, "Tt e's praeg "4g Jo doqsig prog ONL *S"a'd “d "WL “bsq “Wet, *H ‘¢ oe | ‘srst ‘6 jnSny ‘vasNyAS ‘sad “bsg “oA01 ‘"T'M ‘Sua “bsg ‘udmpig “AA staiorT "(WW ‘TOON ‘al . ABOeatic cpio fetehs 4 SAOROUHUCOLIConoAReponLoOde® ‘ Sha ae nnas ‘Sua ‘gepueyy jo need ay} *Aoy A19A OWT, > ‘aap ‘Ajot00g [eso i pcaases Sia sags shane Croat eee yes riers guy ‘sald “S"H'a ‘eqoegepad “VL "HS J au} Jo epIsad ‘NOLUNVHLUON AO SINODUVA UL ec eeeee eee twee "SU's ‘QIepy UNOOSIA “ye WM ‘oyng jo smbaeqy ouL ‘SW CVIN TWetod ‘Jorg Ao OGL = “Saal “WW “Auaqnecy qossayorg Wea “bsg ‘purpy yyromquayy J ‘Saad “aa ‘xoySUT989 AA Jo uvacy 94} "say AIaA —“PplOFXO “pst ‘ez oung ‘ax01xO Sra “WH TOMTEA Waqoy “A9y) 3° Aysiaatay, 2} IOF ‘g* W‘ ‘T'0'd “bs “Qmoojsqy T[euyong “4H svuoyy, Sse t 888" p1OFXO Jo ApISIOAIUL) OY} OJ A" ke Ap ag pea Reeant ° * APISIOATUL] BY} JO JOTTaIUTYO-99IA VOL | “SUA “TOA “Ned ‘SITONI AUUVH LUAAOU IS Pa RRS "S'U'A “pxojxo Jo doysig pioy oy, *S'U'A ‘essoy Jo eM OUT Tht eyed as, Tamog qossqord = ‘SU “a'I ‘UaAG Jossojorg > ; ; eee eee eee eee es ee ee eeee esee “SW ‘p10jxoQ jo doysig 10'T OL - bea ‘poo PoC s MT Fel), eee Gm i ORR DEC Sw ak O'd “da'W ‘“4aeg ‘uojuneyg +7, 881095) 11g "QPSI ‘OI Jaquiajdag ‘NOLAWVHINOS QW Hed ol Shes iam asn ante ee wet yeea Dey es, * AWM ‘ataazory] weg sopeyO “UOH ISTH ('S'L'A'S'9S'0'D ‘NOSIHOUNM ATAWI HOlMAAOU AIS TeAIOoSS tresses MojstoUT[eg JUNOISIA «= "7T"'7E9' ‘UOJINQYSy pso'T treeessserreoed “GsnOLogIex JO [IV oT, ‘AoJSayOUTAA Jo smbavyy oyL, KEIO AO FL SOLE CPD AOS CUED fry (le ME 4 1g ‘HOIMSpag IOssajorg "Aa IT, ‘s" Wa “wn * poysuy Jossajorg SOOO ee we ee wwe eee ee ewww we enreee ‘Swa “Tod “wit “bsa ‘kur Ts m3) ‘Sa “WH “bsg ‘surydoy wen Peewee etree ewe tteaseee ‘a’ “oysury x) ‘AOY ‘aq ‘weyqeiy “f *AIY tt eeereeceeseeeseees ugtMrony Jo doystg OL, ‘QYOIMPIVHT JO [VY OUT, *cPsi ‘61 oung ‘aDaIaaWVvO terse oo OgnrT “j1¢ “THHOSUAH *“M ‘A NHOL UIS *PEBI “9% qaquiaydag ‘au0K "SUA “'IT ‘Aqsaroag "My tAay J crete settee eects eee eee ee emcurer Gord “bsg Lepereg [Cyril “9° ssa “(AT Jo ueeq) *a'd ‘MOOOVAd “D “ATU OL 'S'T'd “bsg ‘aude semoyy, ) "Sra CH'M ‘toqsmorg pred 1g ‘dW ‘AoproM, wWenjg uyor ‘woH on ‘s'D'a “bsg “preyeH mem Leet ts geptar “qyedsoy guNodsTA ‘SUT ‘Wey [eg *bsq "1210 TM. “bsq ‘Joya H WIV [See ester rece snes cevcesccsuceeceesecens ecrecy “qosutqory "J DL, ‘ACW "UITGNG *O'“.L' A ‘Wosreg ‘sor ‘Aas **° free teeeeeeeesrceeee ewreyeresory UOIWEH “YW AA AIS "W'WA ‘ATIeAe1g UyOL ToBSaJoIg [vette ttt ee ee tees eer eeeveeeees erarepW gUNODSTA "POMOISIT JO [re *sPst ‘ZT ysnsny ‘HX0D COO OO ROHR Oe ewe ee eee eee ‘SU ‘aSsOu ie) Tuva oUL *bsa 450\\ UeTTI AA sin\eie se)nleinis ole bie \a\n sie s\n vie e)e)sie sie 0 0ieeis «ei einieiecenray INOUE, Saal qsuy ,sorueypoay MH ‘sorg “bsg ‘sqooer [uid J aA +Syo100g "1d 3B TINH ‘dA “O'W sadoop Arua [ss Sorry omSpag "Jorg *Aayy ‘sua “T'O'a ‘Aeperey s0ssojorg WH “aTT “bse “MyID preqory eee eee ee eeee "SOT “Usa feng rT aa rT “aa “moore Jauojog-"ynevT sea ratecatatmea areigmansaaa: | ESTO G2 Tektite Oy Tee ganenee ae “Je8t ‘gz sn8ny ‘nrTaaq ei Sot, a Repeat tenet age An Cer inn ic ds SO OR REE Be! ‘bsg ‘ajoog “gq Apuny 5 jo: (gin ote in va%e ais p= fee. Rivne ES veeeeeees ts -cgaupryy jo stnbaeyyy OUT, ‘smd “Tora “a'd ‘GAOTT AGUHAINOH ‘AXA LL eee ee eee eee eee eee ee “urlqnd aBaTjoo Ajay, Jo qsoaoig auL tose eeeeeeeeeeeeseeees umn Jo OAV PLOT VU} a[qunouoyy SY OL, se esowe ry faso[g sours ‘AN oy, = ‘bsq “soyege pAOTT Yorsaeg svooy, ‘gost ‘9 sndiny ‘KVHNaKIaH Sag eSnH OM VoL oor OTTO “S4S'O'D ‘uostpoIN *T YOMOpPOY MS |... sees eee aise ’ tiene Tl eee ‘s'w'a “bsg “ysruvog preqont : Ri sptantcd hes d pxoyxQ Jo Aqsa9AtUy ay} Ut AuLvjOg “y' ‘uosurqoy “de Seecceaireieiee eee eee ea a coroner pee oa) 7° oso “Be “CW “ANDENY. ‘9 SHTUVED .eeee eee een eet een ee -* ‘SU ian 1\e ‘WOsuOTLT, We TAA IOssajolg seenevee quip eAoyy 249 Jo JOISeIT “SUA “VI He ig na SeULOTLL, ‘bea “orpmory ure seen anew eee eee eter eee eee eee eee eeeenne ‘Sw oe ST cumIg Joye M “oUBT “I raquiaydag “Ato RM ‘a “WO0S19) uy svuro iL Jd se eeececes Seer ee eee eee eee eens ‘a RT 'S'u'a “bse ‘yIWUIg sauce Roo =' eich cig aaa cea ee “5 i) AS erie One Made bicensea sesapbprsseane sane sane Set eta Own IPAT SLED S')'d “SW “WIADUV AO ANAC MUL © 6 oe 0 00st ects pip ces cle ere iiascen esse ee “SW “weg ‘quipavs WIRITILAA IIS bo stews Deen eee cieenc cis veces ccacrsey ‘guepaRjor AT qedroutrg *Aay Ata A oULL eee e ee rneee tein 'giainAisiviaie'e ¢)0)0 nvnxyays or ow “bsq ‘saqe a syoorg ydasor [ eeeeee hr "SVU So » "Y ‘Sua “bsq Jesse] mrerntAN = Terre eee eer eee ee ee ee *2: puqmeg ‘a: Eye} ULL, 2 ‘ d 6 a A ayy *mrormy enero, | earn Serna “erqeran dor “ema “Ca “WaMOUAA OREasOLT “Al {881 (08 waquioydag “r00aamArT gutta “CCN wosenpIC Ydas0g eee Oe en eta “Sata er me | "Sara ‘ACMOUUVH AO 'THVA UL posers SOA “SW “a “Weg ‘uoja3q AorH sudyeyy ep diya 11S eee eee ween ee ew a a “Sard OWT ‘Ka]so7,01 pio'y au ceoee "seg ‘2 aoquiajdag ‘11a [a soa “swan “vw bes ‘1d “quIeD "sag Ry “sou “sm'a'aA “WN “bsa ‘SNIMNdOH WVITTIM 20 a ‘S'U'A ‘Ysnosogsepuoy plot = “SU 'A “PISHAVD JO VA OWL reeeeeseeese scperpry “ATTAINS IOSSAJOIg ‘S'U'T “S9YOIG "4H "4 IOssajorg le ee ee ‘SV Ua “W0ewW “sold “aa *HOSUIq Oz "” aay “AOU WOSTIM ‘A "MA ToSsoyorg | "** "TT * BsezOE ‘adaq[0p S,uvent “srg “qq ‘Aue *§ ‘d “ACW ‘ESI ‘1 taqmajydag ‘usvaIag "a {295,10 We Tere eer eee eee ee WIWHA “a'd ‘Pury prepa "Ao Se alee eee ae rake ag apne ORM CAO MOUs 20, cel A. bso ‘UeTIV 'O CoM TOeTrrrrer rrr rerr rr rr tr. ios “SW ‘aqpagrped *y, Ammoyy arg 2 ‘SIL, ‘froq ay pesoyy ANIAVS aduvMaa THUNOI09 POPPE eee eee eee eee ee "S'U ‘Sag “WLUW ‘essoy Jo [rey oy Teer ee ee ees teteeeeeesescuareg frog ‘uayrysmug jo leq oy, seeeeeececeeesececes scary ‘CIaISOA “AL ‘a’ “bsg ‘ploqqoo *o “fr ‘our’ ‘ spa “bs ee qq TOPPA AUTEM IS “Sa “HUG “nvapog “qd UYOL aI | "1s81 ‘% Aqag ‘HOTMSay a UPPprsE may 38005 J NE CA EEE Se gira SPH MOH LOYD "OH coeceeaeeneseevecicreeitent festanesesq@fOyt A9UIOM odo A bgt Seacrest ; Reacnenas enema Swe yT ‘yomMSpag tossajorg *Aoy | -O1SV Connay “TOA ‘besa ‘AUIV ITAGGIA ANNOAD svar “bsg ‘eye s9teGO [ f.......++ egoraony 0 douse PLOT OL “aI “Wweysorpuoy p10Ty OWL, *SaINVLANDAS TWI0T *SLNAGISSUd-ADIA *SLNAGISadd *sjosuoy *yu90 rad ¢ ‘QD0SF Spun 94} Ul mou Ayradorg *g'N OL I 9L06F % 3 802 LL OL GL rreeeereeeerseeereeees sraanseor, 1200'T pue Jamsvory, [etouey ay} JO spuey oy} Ul OFT 6g BEL eens sraqueg 48 auered 0 0 OL SO er aoulyes jo uoyesedorg 0 0 OL seer reer eeseeseeee euomlouey yeorpotieg 0 0 OL ss sist oo esomies*™*° ROT T: wor] jo que 0 0 0z seeneccoecnoe ten BIry jo moOOVy yeormeyg 6 €16 seereoreestog SUISpIIq] pue Juspoaq 0 0 OOL srevseeereesens SOTATIOUAG [BOTLSO[OUPIUIG 0 0 GLS a JO} *ZIA ‘SpUBIH JO JUNOIDW UOC 0 0 00s" seeseeeresCCQT ‘qne10) 0 0 GhF* “" $EQq ‘query Jo soueyed “21a ‘A109 -Bara3qQ MOY JO JWOUIYSTIQeIs| 94} Furureyureyy 0 0 0002 stresses sTosuoy “490 Jad ¢ “SOT 69BGF Mey 0 0 Ose senseeccgtossreseecenseoeseserreees STITOUL ZT ‘solreyeg 0 0 92 “+ Sanaa, Wayy-syuemy, Jo yzoday 10j Sutavasug Z 61 409 Stas a’s's cmislejeienipcbe's Sian sfis'e 6/etars'omre isle” yey ‘Bumuatisuy ‘Bunooyy ypAnoj-Kquamy, oy} Jo yodoy Zuyumg L 9 678 *s*se*sQINSBOIJ, [BOOT Puv JoINsvary, Te1ausy Aq squaukeg yeyeplouy pue ‘Bursys0apy ‘uygug Axpung ‘Suyooy, MoSsepy jo sasuadxg pred Ag PSs F “S~NGNAVd OL Ll OLGrF sesonpny 4 , ‘SALVA SUNVS UPLSTANVT NIMC 6 SL IFT ‘9% ‘sieyg jo angoreyey ‘sy10doy *Z1A ‘suoeoqng JO seg Wor © EI ZeL “t s[osuog “yue0 tod € "SOT 69ZF JO 212g Jo spaad0id paatsoay 0 Il 191 seaceeeeceascsceeecereusesssceeeeseoes® STATIOUL ZI ‘y003¢ wo spuepislg 0 0 c PPreererr erry rer suoryeortqug aangny IOF uorisodu10; OD Sag Tee eanreceesteaanenetes caste mene anehoesepgatp gu syayory, ,SOIPe'T 00. BGDT Cee teeeeee neers OMT ge syayaTy, Soyvroossy 0 0 Zor PPUTTTELIOT Eee ee 0331p 0341p ‘suordiaosqng jenuuy 0 0 Gag terete aoms puw moBseg ye suorsodmog oxy 8 I 118 PTET eRe qunoo0Vy 4S8PT wloxy qysn0.1q, gouryeq OL DS § *SLdIGOda -(mequayaYO 32) 9SST IsNIny Tyg 0} (moSsepH 3) est Toqmaydeg ZI WY LNNOOOV SAAUNASVAUL TVAANGO AHL 7 ee oe See 2 ee ee ee ee eee eS "TONAIOS JO LNANWAONVACY AHL WOd NOILVIOOSSV HSLLIYE Il. Table showing the Names of Members of the British Association who have served on the Council in former years. Acland, Sir Thomas D., Bart.,F.R.S. Acland, Professor H. W., M.D., F.R.S. Adams, J. Couch, M.A., F.R.S. Adamson, John, Esq., F.L.S. Ainslie, Rev. Gilbert, D.D., Master of Pein- broke Hall, Cambridge. Airy, G. B., D.C.L.,F.R.S., Astronomer Royal. Alison, Professor W. P., M.D., F.R.S.E. Ansted, Professor D. T., M.A., F.R.S. Argyll, George Douglas, Duke of, F.R.S. Arnott, Neil, M,D., F.R.S. Ashburton, William Bingham, Lord, D.C.L. Babbage, Charles, Esq., M.A., F.R.S. Babington, C. C., Esq., M.A., F.R.S. Baily, Francis, Esq., F.R.S. (deceased). Baker, Thomas Barwick Lloyd, Esq. Balfour, Professor John H., M.D., F.R.S. Barker, George, Esq., F.R.S. (deceased). Bell, Professor Thomas, Pres.L.S., F.R.S. Beechey, Rear-Admiral, F.R.S. (deceased). Bengough, George, Esq. Bentham, George, Esq., F:L.S. Bigge, Charles, Esq. Blakiston, Peyton, M.D., F.R.S. Boileau, Sir John P., Bart., F.R.S. Boyle, Rt. Hon. D., Lord Justice-Gen!, (dec®), Brand, William, Esq. “ Breadalbane, John, Marquis of, K.T., F.R.S. Brewster, Sir David, K.H., D.C.L., LL.D., F.R.S., Principal of the United College of St. Salvator and St. Leonard, St. Andrews, Brisbane, General Sir Thomas M., Bart., K.C.B., G.C.H., D.C.L., F.R.S. Brooke, Charles, B.A., F.R.S. Brown, Robert, D.C.1., F.R.S. Brunel, Sir M. I., F.R.S. (deceased.) Buckland, Very Rev. William, D.D., F.R.S., Dean of Westminster. (deceased). Burlington, William, Earl of, M.A., F.R.S. Bute, John, Marquis of, K.T. (deceased). Carlisle, George Will. Fred., Earl of, F.R.S. Carson, Rev. Joseph, F.T.C.D. Cathcart, Lt.-Gen., Earl of, K.C.B., F.R.S.E. Chalmers, Rev. T., D.D., Professor of Di- vinity, Edinburgh. (deceased), Chance, James, Esq. Chester, John Graham, D.D., Lord Bishop of. Christie, Professor S. H., M.A., F.R.S. Clare, Peter, Esq., F.R.A.S. (deceased). Clark, Rev. Prof., M.D., F.R.S, (Cambridge). Clark, Henry, M.D. Clark, G. T., Esq. Clear, William, Esq. (deceased). Clerke, Maj. S., K.H.,R.E., F.R.S.(deceased), Clift, William, Esq., F.R.S. (deceased). Close, Very Rev. Francis, M.A., Dean ofCarlisle, Cobbold, John Chevalier, Esq., M.P. Colquhoun, J. C., Esq., M.P. (deceased). Conybeare, Very Rev. W. D., Dean of Llandaff. Corrie, John, Esq., F.R.S. (deceased), Crum, Walter, Esq., F.R.S. Currie, William Wallace, Esq. (deceased). Dalton, John, D.C.L., F.R.S. (deceased). Daniell, Professor J. F., F.R.S. (deceased). Dartmouth, William, Earl of, D.C.L., F.R.S. Darwin, Charles, Esq., M.A., F.R.S. Daubeny, Professor CharlesG.B.,M.D., F.R.S. DelaBeche, Sir Henry T., C.B., F.R.S., Di- rector-General of the Geological Survey of the United Kingdom. (deceased), ; Dillwyn, Lewis W., Esq., F.R.S. (deceased). Drinkwater, J. E., Esq. (deceased). Ducie, The Earl, F.R.S. Dunraven, the Earl of, F.R.S. Egerton, Sir P. de M. Grey, Bart., M.P., F.R.S. Eliot, Lord, M.P. Ellesmere, Francis, Earl of, F.G.S. (deceased). Enniskillen, William, Ear] of, D.C.L., F.R.S. Estcourt, I. G. B., D.C.L. (deceased). Faraday, Professor, D.C.L., F.R.S. Fitzwilliam, The Earl, D.C.L., F.R.S. Fleming, W., M.D. Fletcher, Bell, M.D. Forbes, Charles, Esq. (deceased). Forbes, Professor Edward, F.R.S. (deceased). Forbes, Professor J. D., F.R.S., Sec. R.S.E. Fox, Robert Were, Esq., F.R.S. Frost, Charles, F.S.A. Gassiot, John P., Esq., F.R.S. Gilbert, Davies, D.C.L., F.R.S. (deceased), Graham, T., M.A., F.R.S., Master of the Mint, Gray, John E., Esq., Ph.D., F.R.S. Gray, Jonathan, Esq. (deceased). Gray, William, Esq., F.G.S. Green, Professor Joseph Henry, F.R.S. Greenough, G. B., Esq., F.R.S. (deceased), Grove, W. R., Esq., M.A., F.R.S. Hallam, Henry, Esq., M.A., F.R.S. Hamilton, W. J., Esq., For. Sec. G.S. Hamilton, Sir William R., LL.D., Astronomer Royal of Ireland, M.R.I.A., F.R.A.S. Harcourt, Rev. William Vernon, M.A., F.R.S. Hardwicke, Charles Philip, Earl of, F.R.S. Harford, J. S., D.C.L., F.R.S. Harris, Sir W. Snow, F.R.S. Harrowby, The Earl of, F.R.S. Hatfeild, William, Esq., F.G.S. (deceased). Henry, W. C., M.D., F.R.S. Henry, Rev. P. S., D.D., President of Queen’s College, Belfast. Henslow, Rev. Professor, M.A., F.L.S. Herbert, Hon. and Very Rev. William, LL.D., F.L.S., Dean of Manchester. (deceased). Herschel, Sir John F. W., Bart., D.C.L., F.R.S. Heywood, Sir Benjamin, Bart., F.R.S. Heywood, James, Esq., F.R.S. Hill, Rev. Edward, M.A,, F.G.S. Hincks, Rev. Edward, D.D., M.R.I.A.(dec®), Hinds, S., D.D., late Lord Bishop of Norwich. Hodgkin, Thomas, M.D. Hodgkinson, Professor Eaton, F,R.S, Hodgson, Joseph, Esq., F.R.S. Hooker, Sir William J., LL.D., F.R.S. Hope, Rev. F. W., M.A., F.R.S. Hopkins, William, Esq., M.A., F.R.S. Horner, Leonard, Esq., F.R.S., F.G.S. Hovenden, V. F., Esq., M.A. Hutton, Robert, Esq., F.G.S. Hutton, William, Esq., F.G.S. Ibbetson, Capt. L.L. Boscawen, K.R.E.,F.G.S. Inglis,SirR.H.,Bart.,D.C.L.,M.P.,F.R.S,(dec.) Jameson, Professor R., F.R.S. (deceased). Jardine, Sir William, Bart., F.R.S.E. Jeffreys, John Gwyn, Esq., F.R.S. Jenyns, Rev. Leonard, F.L.S. Jerrard, H. B., Esq. Johnston, Right Hon. William, late Lord Provost of Edinburgh. Johnston, Prof. J. F. W., M.A., F.R.S. (dec). Keleher, William, Esq. (deceased). Kelland, Rev. Professor P., M.A. Lankester, Edwin, M.D., F.R.S. Lansdowne, Henry, Marquis of, D.C.L.,I.R.S. Lardner, Rev. Dr. Lassell, William, Esq., F.R.S. L. & E. Latham, R. G., M.D., F.R.S. Lee, Very Rev. John, D.D., F.R.S.E., Prin- cipal of the University of Edinburgh. Lee, Robert, M.D., F.R.S. Lefevre, Right Hon. Charles Shaw, late Speaker of the House of Commons. Lemon, Sir Charles, Bart., F.R.S. Liddell, Andrew, Esq. (deceased). Lindley, Professor John, Ph.D., F.R.S. Listowel, The Earl of. Lloyd, Rev. B., D.D., Provost of Trin. Coll. Dublin. (deceased). Lloyd, Rev. H., D.D., D.C.L., F.R.S.L. & E. V.P.R.I.A., Trinity College, Dublin. Londesborough, Lord, F.R.S. Lubbock, Sir John W., Bart., M.A., F.R.S, Luby, Rev. Thomas. Lyell, Sir Charles, M.A., F.R.S. MacCullagh, Prof., D.C.L., M.R.I.A. (dec®). Macfarlane, The Very Rev. Principal. MacLeay, William Sharp, Esq., F.L.S. MacNeill, Professor Sir John, F.R.S. Malcolm, Vice-Ad. Sir Charles, K.C.B. (dec®), Maltby, Edward, D.D., F.R.S., late Lord Bishop of Durham. Manchester, J. P. Lee, D.D., Lord Bishop of. Meynell, Thomas, Esq., F.L.S. Middleton, Sir William F. F., Bart. Miller, Professor W. A., M.D., F.R.S. Miller, Professor W. H., M.A., F.R.S. Moillet, J. D., Esq. (deceased), Milnes, R. Monckton, Esq., M.P. Moggridge, Matthew, Esq. Moody, J. Sadleir, Esq. Moody, T. H. C., Esq. Moody, T. F., Esq. Morley, The Earl of. Moseley, Rev. Henry, M.A., F.R.S. Mount-Edgecumbe, Ernest Augustus, Earl of. Murchison, Sir Roderick I., G.C.St.S., F.R.S. Neill, Patrick, M.D., F.R.S.E. Nicol, D., M.D. Nicol, Rev. J. P., LL.D. Northampton, Spencer Joshua Alwyne, Mar- quis of, V.P.R.S. (deceased). Northumberland, Hugh, Duke of, K.G., M.A., F.R.S. (deceased). Ormerod, G. W., Esq., M.A., F.G.S. Orpen, Thomas Herbert, M.D. (deceased). Orpen, John H., LL.D. Osler, Follett, Esq., F.R.S. Owen, Professor Richard, M.D., F.R.S, Oxford, Samuel Wilberforce, D.D., Bishop of, F.R.S., F.G.S. Palmerston, Viscount, G.C.B., M.P. Peacock, VeryRev.G.,D.D.,DeanofEly,I'.R.S. Peel,Rt.Hon.Sir R.,Bart.,M.P.,D.C.L. (dec), Pendarves, E., Esq., F.R.S. Phillips, Professor John, M.A., F.R.S. Porter, G. R., Esq. (deceased). Powell, Rev. Professor, M.A., F.R.S. Prichard, J. C., M.D., F.R.S. (deceased). Ramsay, Professor William, M.A. Reid, Maj.-General SirW.,K.C.B.,R.E.,F.R.S. Rendlesham, Rt. Hon. Lord, M.P. Rennie, George, Esq., F.R.S. Rennie, Sir John, F.R.S. Richardson, Sir John, M.D., C.B., F.R,S. Lord Ritchie, Rev. Prof., LL.D., F.R.S. (deceased). Robinson, Rev. J., D.D. Robinson, Rev. T. R., D.D., F.R.A.S. Robison, Sir Jghn, Sec.R.S.Edin, (deceased). Roche, James, Esq. Roget, Peter Mark, M.D., F.R.S. Ronalds, Francis, F.R.S. Rosse, William, Earl of, M.A.,F.R.S., Royle, Professor John F., M.D., F.R.S. Russell, James, Esq. (deceased). Russell, J. Scott, Esq., F.R.S. Sabine, Maj.-General, R.A.,Treas. & V.P.R.S. Sanders, William, Esq., F.G.S. Scoresby, Rev. W., D.D., F.R.S. (deceased). Sedgwick, Rev. Professor Adam, M.A.,F.R.S. Selby, Prideaux John, Esq., F.R.S.E. Sharpey, Professor, M.D., Sec.R.S. Smith, Lieut.-Colonel C. Hamilton, F.R.S. Smith, James, F.R.S. L. & E. Spence, William, Esq., F.R.S. Stanley, Edward, D.D., F.R.S., late Lord Bishop of Norwich. (deceased). Staunton, Sir G. T., Bt., M.P., D.C.L., F.R.S. St. David’s, C. Thirlwall, D.D., Lord Bishop of. Stevelly, Professor John, LL.D. Stokes, Professor G. G., Sec.R.S. Strang, John, Esq., LL.D. Strickland, Hugh E., Esq., F.R.S. (deceased). Sykes, Colonel W. H., M.P., F.R.S. Symonds, B. P., D.D., Vice-Chancellor of the University of Oxford. Talbot, W. H. Fox, Esq., M.A., F.R.S. Tayler, Rev. John James, B.A. Taylor, John, Esq., F.R.S. Taylor, Richard, Esq., F.G.S. Thompson, William, Esq., F.L.S. (deceased). Thomson, Professor William, M.A., F.R.S. Tindal, Captain, R.N. Tite, William, Esq., M.P., F.R.S. “ Tod, James, Esq., F.R.S.E. Tooke, Thomas, F.R.S. Traill, J. S., M.D. (deceased). Turner, Edward, M.D., F.R.S. (deceased). Turner, Samuel, Esq., F.R.S., F.G.S. (dec4.) Turner, Rev. W. Tyndail, Professor, F.R.S. Vigors, N. A., D.C.L., F.L.S. (deceased). Vivian, J. H., M.P., F.R.S. (deceased). Walker, James, Esq., F.R.S. Walker, Joseph N., Esq., F.G.S. Walker, Rev. Professor Robert, M.A., F.R.S. Warburton, Henry, Esq., M.A., F.R.S. Washington, Captain, R.N., F.R.S. Webster, Thomas, M.A,, F.R.S. West, William, Esq., F.R.S. (deceased). Western, Thomas Burch, Esq. Wharncliffe, John Stuart, Lord, F.R.S. Wheatstone, Professor Charles, F.R.S. Whewell, Rev. William, D.D., F.R.S., Master of Trinity College, Cambridge. Williams, Professor Charles J.B., M.D., F.R.S. Willis, Rev. Professor Robert, M.A., F.R.S. Wills, William, Esq., F.G.S. Winchester, John, Marquis of. Woollcombe, Henry, Esq., F.S.A. (deceased). Wrottesley, John, Lord, M.A., Pres. R.S. Yarborough, The Earl of, D.C.L. Yarrell, William, Esq., F.L.S. (deceased). Yates, James, Esq., M.A., F.R.S. Yates, J. B., Esq., F.S.A., F.R.G.S,(deceased). OFFICERS AND COUNCIL, 1856-57. TRUSTEES (PERMANENT). 5! Sir Roperick I.Murcuison,G.C.St.S.,F.R.S. The Very Rev.Gzoree Peacock,D.D,, Dean Joun Tarxor, Esq., F.R.S. * of Ely, F.R.S. PRESIDENT. CHARLES G. B. DAUBENY, M.D., F.R.S., F.L.S., F.G.S., Hon. M.R.LA., Regius Professor of Botany in the University of Oxford. VICE-PRESIDENTS. The Eart Duciz, F.R.S., F.G.S. Soc., Director-General of the Geological Sir Roperick I. Murcuison, G.C.St.S., Survey of the United Kingdom. D.C.L., F.R.S., F.G.S.,F.L.S.,V.P.R.Geogr. THomas Barwick Lioyp Baker, Esq. The Rey. Francis Cros, M.A. PRESIDENT ELECT. The REV. HUMPHREY LLOYD, D.D., D.C.L., F.R.S. L. & E., V.P.R.LA., Trinity College, Dublin. VICE-PRESIDENTS ELECT. The Rt. Hon. the Lorv Mayor of Dublin. Sir Wrzx1am R. Hamitton, LL.D., F.R.A.S., The Provost of Trinity College, Dublin. Astronomer Royal of Ireland. The Marauis oF KiLpARE. Lt.-Colonel Larcom, R.E., LL.D., F.R.S. The Lorp TaLzor DE MALAHIDE. Ricuarp J. Grirrirn, LL.D., M.R.LA,, The Lorn Crier Baron, Dublin. F.R.S.E., F.G.S. LOCAL SECRETARIES FOR THE MEETING AT DUBLIN. Lunpy E. Foore, Esq., Secretary to Royal Dublin Society. Rev. Professor JELLETT, Secretary to Royal Irish Academy. W. Nerison Hancock, LL.D., Secretary to Statistical Society, Dublin. LOCAL TREASURER FOR THE MEETING AT DUBLIN. Joun H. Orpen, LL.D. ORDINARY MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL. Bett, Prof., Pres.L.S., F.R.S. Lyx, Sir C., D.C.L., F.R.S. Suarpry, Professor, Sec. B.S. Darwin, Cuartes, F.R.S. Mirver, Prof. W. A., M.D., Sranuey, Lord. Gassiot, Joun P., F.R.S. F.R.S. Stroxes, Professor, F.R.S. Gray, J. E., Ph.D., F.R.S. Owen, Professor, F.R.S. Tirs, W., M.P., F.S.A.,F.R.S. Grove, Witit1amM R., F.R.S. Price, Rev. Prof., F.R.S. Waker, Rey. Prof., F.R.S. Heywoop, Jams, Esq. Raw inson,ColonelSirH.C., Wessrer, THomas, F.R.S. Hurron, Rozert, F.G.S. K.C.B., F.R.S. Wrorresey,Lord,Pres.R.S. Latuam, R. G., M.D., F.R.S. Rennie, Georee, F.R.S. Yates, James, F.R.S. EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL. The President and President Elect, the Vice-Presidents and Vice-Presidents Elect, the Ge- neral and Assistant-General Secretaries, the General Treasurer, the Trustees, and the Presi- dents of former years, viz. The Earl Fitzwilliam. Rev. Professor Sedgwick. Sir Thomas M. Brisbane. The Marquis of Lansdowne. The Earl of Burlington. Rev. W. V. Harcourt. The Marquis of Breadalbane. Rev. Dr. Whewell. The Earl of Ellesmere. The Earl of Rosse. The Dean of Ely. Sir John F. W. Herschel, Bart. Sir Roderick I. Murchison. The Rey. Dr. Robinson. Sir David Brewster. G. B. Airy, Esq., the Astronomer Royal. General Sabine. William Hopkins, Esq., F.R.S. The Earl of Harrowby. The Duke of Argyll. GENERAL SECRETARY. Masor-GENERAL Epwarp SABINg, R.A., Treas. & V.P.R.S., F.R.A.S., 13 Ashley Place, Westminster. ASSISTANT GENERAL SECRETARY. Joun Purtuies, Esq., M.A., F.R.S., F.G.S., Reader in Geology in the University of Oxford ; Magdalen Bridge, Oxford. GENERAL TREASURER. Joun Taytor, Esq., F.R.S., 6 Queen Street Place, Upper Thames Street, London. LOCAL TREASURERS. William Gray, Esq., F.G.S., York. Professor Ramsay, M.A., Glasgow. C.C. Babington, Esq.,M.A.,F.R.S.,Cambridge. Robert P. Greg, Esq., F.G.S., Manchester. William Brand, Esq., Edinburgh. John Gwyn Jeffreys, Esq., F.R.S., Swansea. John H. Orpen, LL.D., Dudlin. J. B. Alexander, Esq., Jyswich. William Sanders, Esq., F.G.S., Bristol. Robert Patterson, Hsq., M.R.1.A., Belfast, Robert M‘Andrew, Esq., F.R.S., Liverpool. Edmund Smith, Esq., Auli. W. RB, Wills, Esq., Birmingham. James Agg Gardner, Esq., Cheltenham. AUDITORS. William Tite, Esq., M.P. Edwin Lankester, M.D. James Yates, Esq. : ; OFFICERS OF SECTIONAL COMMITTEES. XXVii- OFFICERS OF SECTIONAL COMMITTEES PRESENT AT THE CHELTENHAM MEETING. ae SECTION A.-—-MATHEMATICS AND PHYSICS. President.—Rev. R. Walker, M.A., F.R.S., Reader in Experimental Philosophy, Oxford. Vice-Presidents.—Sir William Snow Harris, F.R.S.; Rev. H. Lloyd, D.D., F.R.S., M.R.I.A.; Rev. B. Price, M.A., Sedleian Professor of Natural Philosophy, Oxford; Rev. W. Whewell, D.D., F.R.S., Master of Trinity College, Cambridge; Lord Wrottesley, M.A., President of the Royal Society. Secretaries.—Prof. Stevelly, LL.D. ; C. Brooke, B.A., F.R.S.; Rev. T. A. South- wood, M.A., F.R.A.S., Head Master of Civil and Military Department, Cheltenham College; Rev. J.C. Turnbull, M.A., Head Mathematical Master, Cheltenham College. » SECTION B.—CHEMISTRY AND MINERALOGY, INCLUDING THEIR APPLICATIONS TO AGRICULTUREAND THE ANTS. President.—B. C. Brodie, F.R.S., Professor of Chemistry, Oxford. Vice- Presidents.—N. S. Maskelyne, F.G.S., Reader in Mineralogy, Oxford; W. Gregory, F.R.S.E.; Thomas Graham, F.R.S., the Master of the Mint; Thomas Anderson, M.D., F.R.S.E., Professor of Chemistry in the University of Glasgow. Secretaries.—Philip J. Worsley, B.A.; Professor Voelcker, Royal Agricultural College, Cirencester; J. Horsley, Esq. SECTION C.—GLEOLOGY. President.—Professor A. C. Ramsay, F.R.S., and Local Director of the Geological Survey of Great Britain. . Vice-Presidenis.—Rev. Adam Sedgwick, M.A., F.R.S., Woodwardian Professor of Geology in the University of Cambridge; J. Beete Jukes, M.A., F.R.S., Local Director of the Geological Survey of Ireland; The Earl Ducie, F.R.S. Secretaries.—Rev. P. B. Brodie, M.A., F.G.S.; Thomas Wright, M.D., F.R.S.E.; J. Scougall, F.E.1.S., M.C.P., Master, Modern Department of the Cheltenham Grammar School; Edward Hull, F.G.S.; Rev. R. Hepworth, B.A. SECTION D.—ZOOLOGY AND BOTANY, INCLUDING PHYSIOLOGY. President.—Thomas Bell, F.R.S., President of the Linnean Society. Vice-Presidents.— Rey. L. Jenyns, M.A., F.L.S.; Robert Ball, LL.D., Treasurer of the Royal Irish Academy, Director of the Museum in University of Dublin; J. E. Gray, Ph.D., F.R.S.; John H. Balfour, M.D., F.R.S., F.L.S., Professor of Botany in the University of Edinburgh ; Rev. J.S. Henslow, M.A., Prof. of Botany in Uni- versity of Cambridge; George Busk, F.R.S., F.L.S., Professor of Comparative Anatomy and Physiology to the Royal College of Surgeons of England. Secretaries.—E. Lankester, M.D., F.R.S., F.L.S.; J. Buckman, F.L.S., F.G.S., Professor of Botany, Royal Agricultural College, Cirencester ; J. Abercrombie, M.D. SECTION E.— GEOGRAPHY AND ETHNOLOGY. President.—Colonel Sir H. C. Rawlinson, K.C.B., F.R.S. &c. Vice-Presidents.—Sir John F. Davis, Bart., F.R.S.; Sir Roderick Impey Mur- chison, F.R.S., Director-General of the Geological Survey of the United Kingdom; Sir Thomas Phillipps, Bart., M.A., F.R.S.; General Sir George Pollock, Bart., G.C.B., F.R.G.S.; Colonel Philip Yorke, F.R.S. Secretaries.—Norton Shaw, M.D., Sec. Roy. Geogr. Soc. ; R. Cull, F.S.A., Hon, Sec. Ethnol. Soc.; F. b. Hartland, F.S.A., F.R.G.S.; W.H. Rumsey, F.R.C.S. SECTION F.—ECONOMIC SCIENCE AND STATISTICS. President.—Lord Stanley, M.P. Vice-Presidents.—T. Tooke, F.R.S.; John Strang, LL.D. ; W. Tite, M.P., F RAS. ; J. Towne Danson, F.S.S.; James Heywood, F.R.S.; W. Farr, M.D., F.R.S. Secrefaries.—William Newmarch, Hon. Sec. Statistical Society, London; W. Neilson Hancock, LL.D. ; Edward Cheshire, F.R.G.S.; Rev. C. H. Bromby, M.A,; W. M. Tartt, M.S.A. SECTION G.—-MECHANICAL SCIENCE. President.—George Rennie, F.R.S. 3 Vice-Presidents.—John Taylor, F.R.S. ; Andrew Henderson, Esq.; J. G. Appold, F.R.S.; James Nasmyth, C.E.; William Fairbairn, F.R.S. Secretaries. —Charles Atherton, C,E.; B, Jones, Jun.; H. M. Jeffery, M.A, XXVIil REPORT—1856. CORRESPONDING MEMBERS. Professor Agassiz, chusetts. M. Babinet, Paris. Dr. A. D. Bache, Washington. Prince Charies Bonaparte, Paris. Mr. P. G. Bond, Cambridge, U.S. M. Boutigny (d’Evreux). Professor Braschmann, Moscow. Chevalier Bunsen, Heidelberg. Dr. Ferdinand Cohn, Breslau. M. De la Rive, Geneva. Professor Dove, Berlin. Professor Dumas, Paris. Dr. J. Milne-Edwards, Paris. Professor Ehrenberg, Berlin. Dr. Eisenlohr, Carlsruhe. Professor Encke, Berlin. Dr. A. Erman, Berlin. Professor Esmark, Christiania. Cambridge, Massa- Professor G. Forchhammer, Copenhagen. M. Léon Foucault, Paris. Prof. E. Fremy, Paris. M. Frisiani, Milan. Professor Asa Gray, Cambridge, U.S. Professor Henry, Washington, U.S. Baron Alexander von Humboldt, Berlin. M. Jacobi, St. Petersburg. Prof. A. Kélliker, Wurzburg. Prof. De Koninck, Liege. Professor Kreil, Vienna. Dr. A. Kupffer, St. Petersburg. Dr. Lamont, Munich. Prof. F. Lanza, Spoleto. M. Le Verrier, Paris. Baron von Liebig, Munich. Baron de Selys-Longchamps, Liege. Professor Gustav Magnus, Berlin. Professor Matteucci, Pisa. Professor von Middendorff, St. Petersburg. M. l’Abbé Moigno, Paris. M. Morren, Liége. Professor Nilsson, Sweden. Dr. N. Nordengsciold, Finland. M. E. Peligot, Paris. Chevalier Plana, Turin. Professor Pliicker, Bonn. M. Constant Prévost, Paris. M. Quetelet, Brussels. Prof. Retzius, Stockholm. Professor C. Ritter, Berlin. Professor H. D. Rogers, Boston, U.S. Professor W. B. Rogers, Boston, U.S. Professor H. Rose, Berlin. Baron Senftenberg, Bohemia. Dr. Siljestrom, Stockholm. M. Struvé, Pulkowa. Dr. Svanberg, Stockholm. M. Pierre Tchihatchef. Dr. Van der Hoeven, Leyden. Baron Sartorius von Waltershausen, Gottingen. Professor Wartmann, Geneva. Report OF THE COUNCIL OF THE BRITISH ASSOCIATION AS PRESENTED TO THE GENERAL COMMITTEE AT CHELTENHAM, AUGUST 6TH, 1856. a. The Council have the satisfaction of reporting the continued efficiency and progress toward higher usefulness of the Observatory at Kew, which, while it fulfils the original object of its foundation, and readily takes up original research, is now a point of reference for Standard Instruments in meteorology, and auxiliary to the national service. 6. In conducting this establishment, the Council have in previous years had the great benefit of the cooperation of the Royal Society, and the Re- port of the Committee of the Observatory, which is now laid on the table, will show that this highly valued cooperation is continued. The Members will learn from the Report the final result of the Correspondence between the Committee of the Observatory and the Authorities of the Board of Public Works, concerning the repairs of the building and the laying-on of gas. The disadvantages which might have resulted from the unexpected issue of this correspondence have been removed by the prompt liberality of the Council of the Royal Society, who have advanced the necessary funds for immediately supplying the Observatory with gas. c. The Council suggest to the General Committee to tender its cordial thanks to the Royal Society for the effective assistance thus given to an In- stitution in which both the Royal Society and the British Association recog- nize a powerful instrument of philosophical research. REPORT OF THE COUNCIL. XXiX d. The Council have the pleasure to forward another Report from the vigilant Committee which asserts the interests of Science in Parliament. By what means of a public nature the Progress of Science can be accelerated and assured ;—the Benefits of Science applied and extended ;—the Position of the Cultivators of Science amended ;—these questions must strongly interest the Association, which, at the outset, declared its purpose to strive for the removal of all impediments of a public nature by which Science is retarded. Recommending this Report of the Parliamentary Committee to the approba- tion of the General Committee, and the important subjects which it opens to the serious deliberation of the Members, the Council beg to express their readiness to be instrumental in maturing and putting into action any mea- sure which the Association may deem suitable, and in obtaining the coope- ration of other scientific bodies to bring it to a good issue. e. The Council may congratulate the Association on the progress made toward the fulfilment of the 7th Recommendation in the Report of their Parliamentary Committee for 1854-5—“ That an appropriate building, in some central situation in London, should be provided, at the expense of the nation, in which the principal scientific societies may be located together :”— Burlington House is now devoted to the use of the Royal, Linnean, and Chemical Societies—a result due in a great degree to the prudent and per- severing efforts of the Royal Society. Jf: The General Committee will learn with satisfaction that, according to the Report of the General Treasurer, the Funds belonging to the Associa- tion, and invested in the names of the Trustees, amount to £5000. The Council suggest that it is desirable, for many reasons, to maintain a reserve of this kind, sufficient to meet unexpected contingencies, which may arise in consequence of efforts for the advancement of science. g- The Council have added to the List of Corresponding Members the following Foreign men of Science :-— Dr. F. Cohn, Breslau. Prof. E. Fremy, Paris. Prof. A. Kolliker, Wurzburg. Prof. F. Lanza, Spoleto. M. Morren, Liége. M. E. Peligot, Paris. Prof. Retzius, Stockholm. h. The Council have received Letters of Invitation to the Association to hold its next Meeting in Dublin; from The Board of Trinity College, Dublin; The Royal Dublin Society ; The Royal Irish Academy ; The King and Queen’s College of Physicians in Ireland ; The Geological Society of Dublin ; The Lord Mayor and Municipal Council of Dublin. _ 1. The Council has this day received Letters of Invitation to the Associa- tion to hold its next Meeting in Manchester; from The Manchester Geological Society ; The Statistical Society of Manchester ; The Manchester Athenzum ; The Town Clerk of Manchester. XXX -REPORT—1856, kh. It was resolved— That the cordial thanks of the Council be tendered to the Lord Wrottesley and the Officers and Council of the Royal Society, for the promptitude with which they have responded to the request of the British Associa- tion, in granting the sum of £250 for the purpose of lighting the Kew Observatory with gas. Report of the Kew Committee, presented to the Council of the British Association, August 6, 1856. The Committee beg to submit the following Report of their proceedings since the meeting of the British Association at Glasgow :-— The instruments and apparatus sent by the Committee to the Paris Exhi- bition were returned to the Observatory in December last. The total expense incurred by the Committee in connexion with the Exhibition amounted to £202: 7s. 11d., exceeding by £62: 7s. 11d. the sum of £140 granted by the Board of Trade. ‘This balance has since been repaid by the Board. At the last Meeting of the Association, your Committee presented a Special Report, relative to their application to Her Majesty’s Government for the use of two acres of land contiguous to the Observatory, and the lighting of the building with gas,—such applications having been made in consequence of the recommendation of the General Committee at the Liverpool Meeting. The Association is still compelled to pay the high rent of ten guineas per acre for the land. The Committee fully expected that this year they should have been enabled to. report that the expense of lighting the Observatory with gas would have been defrayed by the Government. The President of the Board of Works at first intimated to the Committee that the subject would receive consideration, and subsequently that he would consider the propriety of including the amount in the estimates for the present year. On further application, however, this has been refused. A copy of the corre- spondence is annexed to this Report. Your Committee have, however, the gratification of reporting, that on a representation of the circumstances being submitted by the Council of the Association to the President and Council of the Royal Society, the sum of £250 from the Wollaston Fund was immediately placed at the disposai of the Committee, in order that no further delay from the want of funds should take place in effecting the long-desired object. Much as the Committee may regret the refusal of the Board of Works to grant their request, they gladly avail themselves of this opportunity to express to Lord Wrottesley and the Council of the Royal Society their thanks for the prompt manner in which the intimation was made to them that the money _ had been voted. It affords another proof how ready the Royal Society has ever been to forward and assist scientific investigations. Mr. De la Rue has made a preliminary examination of one of the Huy- genian object-glasses, namely, that of 122 feet focal length, and, so far as he has hitherto been enabled to judge, it would appear that this object-glass defines with tolerable precision; but he is not yet able to say whether it will be desirable to go to the expense of erecting the tower for celestial observations. A paper by Mr. Welsh, descriptive of the Kew Standard Barometer, and of the apparatus and processes employed in the verification of barometers, has been communicated to the Royal Society by the Chairman, and is now being printed in the Transactions of the Society. + ¥ 5 i at ae REPORT OF THE KEW COMMITTEE. XXxi ‘The following statement shows the number of meteorological instruments which have been verified at Kew during the past year :— Thermo- Baro- Hydro- meters. meters. meters. For the Admiralty and Board of Trade.... 360 90 100 For the Portuguese Government ........ 12 For Opticians and others .............- 170 35 Oba) ages get wuss rin ais Sb a ON 100 On February 5, the Committee resolved,—‘“ That, in consideration of the number of Barometers already verified at Kew having been sufficient to defray the preliminary expense of apparatus, the charge for verification shall in future be reduced to five shillings each instrument.” Arrangements have been made with Messrs. Adie, Casella, and Negretti and Zambra, to have on hand a constant supply of verified marine meteoro- logical instruments, and the Public may be supplied through any respectable Optician in London or the country at the following prices :— Since the last Report, the Committee have disposed of 60 standard ther- mometers, graduated at the Observatory. Of these, 14 have been made for Mr. Hopkins, to be employed in his experiments on the effect of pressure upon the melting-points of solids. The charge on account of the graduation and distribution of these thermometers is arranged with the Government Grant Committee of the Royal Society, and consequently does not appear in the financial accounts of the Kew Committee. _ A self-recording Anemometer, for measuring the velocity of the wind on the plan of Dr. Robinson, has been completed at the Observatory by Mr. Beckley: it is erected upon the dome, and has been in regular operation since the Ist of January. Its performance is most satisfactory, the delicacy of its indications being so great, that during the last six months the whole period of “calm,” as shown by the registrations, has been only fowr hours. It has not yet been possible to erect an apparatus for registering the direction of the wind, on account of difficulties arising from the anticipated use of the dome for the solar photographic telescope. The direction of the wind has, however, been observed tive times daily from an ordinary vane. Mr. Beckley has since submitted to the Committee a model of a new arrangement for a self-recording Anemometer, in which the registration of both the direction and velocity of the wind (and also the fall of rain if desired) is obtained upona single sheet of paper. This arrangement is much more compact in its design and less costly in construction than any other with which the Committee are acquainted. Mr. Beckley’s model will be exhibited, and a description of it communicated to this Meeting. A series of monthly determinations of the absolute horizontal force and of the magnetic dip was commenced in January, with instruments provided by General Sabine from his department at Woolwich. Some difficulties have been experienced by Mr. Welsh in the observations of the absolute horizontal force, owing to imperfections in the usual mode of suspension of the magnets during the observations of vibration. These difficulties he hopes soon to overcome by employing reversible collimator magnets, and by an improved mode of suspension. XXXil REPORT—1856, A convenient apparatus has been constructed at the Observatory for the determination of the effect of temperature on magnets: with this apparatus the temperature coefficients of the magnets employed at the Toronto Obser- vatoty have been obtained. The scale of the unifilar, and the dimensions and weights of the inertia rings employed at the same Observatory, have been determined with reference to the Kew standards of length and weight. Two dip circles, one for M. Hansteen of Christiania, and the other for Dr. Pegado of the Meteorological Observatory of Lisbon, have been ex- amined and compared with the Kew instrument before being sent to those gentlemen. A 30-inch transit instrument, lent by General Sabine’s depart- ment, has been erected in the south window of the old transit room. A clock by Shelton, the property of the Royal Society, is used with it. Owing to alterations required in the dome in order to adapt it to the use of the solar photographic telescope, it has been necessary to remove the large electrical apparatus of Mr. Ronalds. An apparatus of smaller size, but on the same plan, has been erected on the side of the dome, by which atmo- spheric electrical phenomena can be determined in the same manner as heretofore. A new vane has also been constructed, having an indicating dial within the dome. Dr. Halleur, who had for about six months assisted Mr. Welsh in the Observatory, having been appointed to a professorship in the New College of Engineering at Calcutta, left the Observatory in September last. In February, the Committee, on the recommendation of Professor J. D. Forbes, engaged Mr. Balfour Stewart of the Edinburgh University, as Assistant Observer, at a yearly salary of £80, with residence in the Obser- vatory. Mr. Stewart commenced his duties on March 1. The Committee regret having to report that the Observatory will shortly lose the services of this gentieman, who has recently been appointed an assistant to Pro- fessor Forbes: he will leave the Observatory on October 1, previous to which the Committee hope to be able to appoint a successor. The Committee refer with pleasure to an ingenious thermometer devised by Mr. Stewart, in which advantage has been taken of the difference of ca- pillary force and friction in two tubes of different capacity connected with the same bulb, to measure the sum of the fluctuations of temperature. The in- strument has been made at the expense of the Committee ; a description of it has been communicated by Mr. Stewart to the Royal Society, and is printed in its “ Proceedings.” Mr. Welsh reports most favourably as to the general attention evinced by Mr. Beckley and Mr. Macgrath in the discharge of their respective duties. Mr. Beckley’s talent as a mechanical engineer renders his services of great value in an establishment where instances constantly occur of work requiring the highest skill being promptly and correctly executed: the assiduity of Mr. Macgrath has been such as to merit the entire approbation of Mr. Welsh. Your Committee cannot close this Report without again recording their high opinion of the unremitting care and attention, as well as of the ability which has ever been displayed by Mr. Welsh, as the Superintendent of the Observatory ; during the past year he was compelled for upwards of six weeks to be in Paris, in order to arrange the delivery of the valuable scientifie appa- ratus forwarded at the request of Her Majesty’s Government by the Committee to the Paris Exhibition; but his arrangements were such, that the general business of the Observatory was not in any way suspended during his absence. Your Committee have finally to report, that the total expenses of the Ob- servatory during the past year amount to £557 : 1s. 9d. In consequence of the Committee having received during the year the sum of £221 : 7s. 8d. for REPORT OF THE KEW COMMITTEE. XXxill the verification of meteorological instruments, they have in hand a balance amounting to £260: 4s. 6d.; they do not consider it therefore necessary to apply to the Association for a larger sum than £350, to enable them to meet the expenses of the ensuing year. By order of the Committee, Joun P. Gassiot, Chairman, 22 July, 1856. Correspondence. “Clapham Common, December 18th, 1855. “ Srr,—In the interview with which you favoured the deputation from the British Association this day, you kindly explained that you had no power to order the Works such as we required to be executed for the Observatory in the Old Deer Park, Richmond, without the sanction of the Lords of the Treasury, and you suggested the advisability of my briefly explaining to you by letter the position in which the Association stands as regards the Building, as also of defining the exact object of our application previously to your submitting the same to their Lordships. “ The Building was placed at the disposition of the British Association by Her Majesty in 1842 for scientific purposes ; it has ever since been used for those objects, the entire expense of the Establishment being paid by the Association, without receiving any assistance, pecuniary or otherwise, from Government. “The Committee has obtained permission from the Hon. Charles Gore, Chief Commissioner of Woods and Forests and Land Revenues Department, to have gas-pipes laid along the pathway through the Park to the Observatory without any cost or indemnification being required by his department, pro- vided the work is done in the winter months ; and the more immediate object of the application of Colonel Sabine and myself was to request you would order at the present time the gas-pipes to be laid on to the Observatory in order that the Building may be properly lighted, such lighting being indis- pensable for the carrying out various scientific investigations, and thus enabling the Committee to fulfil with greater efficacy the purposes for which the Building was originally granted by Her Majesty to the Association. ‘I may add, that the funds of the British Association consist of the con- tributions of its members; from these limited means the Council have most liberally expended of late years an annual sum of £500 for the Observatory, but it being unable to meet this increased expenditure, which would net ex- ceed £250 (the estimate is £200), the Committee has been induced to make this application, which we hope will not be refused. “In respect. to the repairs alluded to by us, we merely desired to explain that some repairs were indispensable to preserve the Building, which, if promptly attended to, would probably save a much larger outlay at a future period. “ The Building could perhaps remain in its present state for a short period, but a trifling outlay, the extent of which could be easily ascertained by the Government Surveyor, would be all that at present is required. The Com- mittee considered it their duty to point this out for your consideration. “T have the honour to be, Sir, “ Your obedient Servant, (Signed) “J. P. Gassior, Chairman of the Kew Committee, British Association.” — The Right Hon. Sir Benjamin Hall, Bart., M.P., Chief Commissioner of Works, Public Buildings, &c. &c.”’ 1856. c xxxiv “REPORT—1856. Pere oe “Office of Works, &c., Dec. 20, 1855,” “ Str,—I am directed by the Chief Commissioner of Her Majesty’s Works, &c., to acknowledge the receipt of your letter, dated the 18th inst., relative to certain works considered to be necessary by the British Association at the Observatory at Kew, and to inform you that the subject will receive consi- deration. “T am, Sir, “Your most obedient Servant, (Signed) “ ALFRED AusTIN, Secretary.” ‘J. Gassiot, Esq.” “ Office of Works, &c., Jan. 5, 1856. - “ Srr,—With reference to your letter dated the 1 8th December last, request- ing on behalf of the Kew Committee of the British Association that gas-pipes may be laid on to the Observatory at Kew, and that certain repairs may be also done to that Building at the expense of this Department, I am directed by the Chief Commissioner of Her Majesty’s Works, &c., to acquaint you that he has caused an estimate to be made of the cost of the Works required by the Society, which amounts to a large sum, and that there are not any funds voted by Parliament out of which such cost can be defrayed. ; “Tam however directed to add, that the Chief Commissioner will consider the propriety of including the amount in the estimates of the ensuing year. “T am, Sir, “ Your most obedient Servant, * (Signed) “ ALFRED Austin, Secretary.” “J. Gassiot, Esq.” “Clapham Common, May 19th, 1856. “ Srr,—I duly received the communication from your office, of 5th of last January, stating that you had caused an estimate to be made of the cost of the Works required at the Observatory in the Old Deer Park, Richmond, and that you would consider the propriety of including the amount in the annual estimates. “T have been informed that the usual estimates have been voted by the House of Commons :—may I therefore beg the favour of your acquainting me, for the information of the Kew Committee of the British Association, whether it is arranged that the laying on of the gas to the Building, and effecting the necessary repairs should now be commenced ? “ Permit me also to explain that it would be very advisable, in order to prevent additional outlay, that no further time should elapse as to the repairs of the Building. “JT have the honour to remain, Sir, “ Your obedient Servant, (Signed) “J. P. Gassior, Chairman of the Kew Committee.” “ The Right Hon. Sir Benjamin Hall, Bart., M.P., Chief Commissioner of Parks, Palaces, &c. &c.” Office of Works, &c., May 27, 1856. “ Srr,-—I am directed by the First Commissioner of Her Majesty’s Works, &c., to acknowledge the receipt of your letter, dated the 19th inst., request- ing that you may be informed whether it is arranged that the works for laying on gas at the Observatory at Kew, and for the necessary repairs, should now be commenced. “In reply, I am directed to call your attention to a letter addressed to you by this Board on the 2nd of June last, to the effect that there would be no objection to the use of gas at the Observatory, but that the whole of the work REPORT OF THE KEW COMMITTEE. “KXXV connected therewith must be done by, and at the expense of, the Kew Com- mittee of the British Association, and to the satisfaction of this Board’s Officer in charge of the district. “J am to add, that this communication was made to you before the First Commissioner came to this Office, and that he was not made aware of it when he gave directions for the letter of the 5th January last to be written to you, in which he informed you that he would consider the propriety of including the cost attending the laying on gas and performing the repairs therein referred to, in the Estimates of the ensuing year. His attention having now been directed to that communication of the 2nd June last, he is of opinion that the decision of the Board thereby conveyed must be ad- hered ‘to, and that he is unable consequently to undertake the laying on gas at the Observatory, or to incur any portion of the expense attending it. “With regard to the repairs referred to in your letter, the First Com- missioner desires me to state that he will shortly communicate with you upon the subject. “Tam, Sir, ( «< Your most obedient Servant, «“ AtFRED AUSTIN, Secretary.” _ J, Gassiot, Esq.” ‘Clapham Common, June 3; 1856. «My Lorp Duxr,—At the suggestion of Col. Sabine, I forward your Grace a copy of a correspondence I have recently had with the Board of Works relative to the lighting of Kew Observatory with gas. _ The letter alluded to of 2nd June 1855, and a copy of which I enclose, is printed in the Report of the Kew Committee. I may also state that in an interview with Sir B. Hall, on 18th last December, both Colonel Sabine and myself explained the particulars of my former correspondence with the Board of Works; this has possibly escaped Sir B. Hall’s recollection, for we left him with the impression that he would grant our request ; and this was further confirmed by a letter received from Mr. Austin, on January 5th, who in reference to our application says, ‘the Chief Commissioner will consider the propriety of including the amount in the Estimates of the ensuing year.’ “JT cannot therefore but feel much disappointed at the result, which, if confirmed, will prevent the Committee from carrying out those scientific researches they have in contemplation. “ Hoping your Grace may induce Sir B. Hall to reconsider the applica- ‘tion, “I have the honour to be, My Lord Duke, “Your obedient Servant, “J. P. GASSIOT, . “His Grace the Duke of Argyll, Chairman of the Kew Committee.” President of the British Association.” “ Clapham Common, July 17, 1856. “ Sir,—I duly received your reply to my last letter of 19th May, and chaving communicated to the President and Council of the British Association your final determination not to incur any portion of the expense of laying on gas to the Observatory, I have now the pleasure of informing you that the Royal Society has, from a small fund bequeathed for scientific purposes, ‘most liberally placed the sum of £250 at the disposal of the Kew Committee, in order that the work may be no longer delayed. : “TJ have respectfully to request you will be pleased to give the necessary directions to the Officer in charge of the district, referred to in Mr. Austin’s letter of 27th May (but whose name, designation, or address I have no e2 XXXV1 -REPORT—1856. means of ascertaining), in order that the Committee may be informed by him in what manner the work must be done to his satisfaction. “ From what took place at the interview with which you favoured General Sabine, Mr. Welsh, and myself on 18th of last December, as well as from the tenor of the letter addressed to me by Mr. Austin on 5th last January, the Committee fully relied on the necessary amount for the proposed work being included in the Estimates; they regret that any circumstance should have arisen to prevent your carrying your intentions into effect, for although the amount may appear trifling, in comparison to many sums voted on such occasions, it is nevertheless a large item in the income of any scientific Society supported entirely by voluntary subscriptions ; and considering that the British Association already devotes the large sum of £500 per annum for the support of the Observatory, the Committee could not anticipate that the cost of laying on gas to a building the property of the Crown, would have been refused by your Board. “T have only to add, that, although nearly two months have elapsed since the date of Mr. Austin’s last letter, and upwards of sixteen months since the subject was first communicated to your Board, I have not received any com- munication relative to the repairs, some of which are absolutely necessary for the preservation of the building. “Regretting that you should have been troubled with so long a corre- spondence on this subject, “T have the honour to be, Sir, “Your most obedient Servant, “ J. P. GAssiot, Chairman of the Kew Committee, British Association.” “The Right Hon. Sir Benjamin Hall, Bart., M.P., First Commissioner of Public Works, &c. &c.” “ Office of Works, &c., 25th July, 1856. ‘“‘ Sir,—I am directed by the First Commissioner of Her Majesty’s Works, &c., to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 17th instant, stating that the British Association will, out of a grant of money made to them by the Royal Society, lay on gas to the Observatory at Kew, and requesting that the necessary orders may be given to the proper officer of this department on the subject, and also calling attention to the state of repair of the Building ; and I am to inform you, in regard to the laying on of the gas, that the Board request that the Committee of the Association will, as soon as they shall be prepared to commence the works, communicate with Mr. Starie, the Officer of this Department, who has the charge of the Kew District, and who is in- structed to attend from time to time to see that the works are performed to his satisfaction. *‘ With regard to the repairs I am directed to state that, upon further con- sideration, a question has arisen which renders it necessary for the First Commissioner to submit that subject to the Treasury, and that upon recei- ving their reply, the First Commissioner will communicate further with the Committee. “Tam, Sir, “Your most obedient Servant, j ‘“‘ ALFRED AUSTIN, Secretary.” “J. P. Gassiot, Esq.” XXXVI REPORT OF THE KEW COMMITTEE. “NOLIN "& pue porpunyy omy, aq 0} soueyeg oy} puy pue a € V Geer QF 09 Te eeesreeeees pope UL aoueleg 0 0 12 ‘"'''''' 9E8T OT 390 Butpus avo ouo ‘puery Jo uo Il cI c see eeeeeaereeeseressseesssesssQQgg Kd Ayyjod pue 93810310 q OLE TS ct aseysog ‘syoog ‘Krquoyezg ‘Suu 8g ¢ OL ttteseseeeeeerrorrons VIOMUPUG pur ‘JaquIeg ‘yayuadieg sesnecseeeeecsaraeeeacteeseranerenerees*® GOT UT a asuadxo sty ye porddns smyiumy toy spreuoy “ATK 9 6L Tp cts coz ‘Ararpueyg ‘sjeog ‘sesuedxg asnoyy € OL &6 ‘ seseeeseseresersteee KOTSOIIOI AL eee ta IOF pOUstUINy SatIpung IOF 0931, @ GL 0g "7 ** 1029 ‘s[ooy, ‘s[eLtoze2]N ‘snyervddy 0 G 3g¢ 0 0 OL ccoteerseseececsccossecsverres KATABIN) ‘ong 0 & 28 ““P'Sny Surpua ‘sy9om JF ‘AoTHOOT “ATL eee eeeeeeneeeecssesseesnes I ‘dag eer Surpue ‘aeok-yey “reMaig “g “ATA DE CUO CCOGTEE | CUeR ORL Gu) “‘Sny ay Surpue ‘rvak ouo ‘qyeIse “A ‘Lf “TIN csteseaeeeeeeeeesseesees SOSTIQdXD a. 201 Surjeaer Ayjad 10x pamorre ‘0991q 0 0 GLI 4a °Sny Surpus ‘1eed ou ‘Ysa AA “TIN OL p 8 F Pes F — ‘029 ‘SOLIR[eS “SENGNAVE “9c8T “Amr 1946 ‘gouodxrg pue sSuriyg mmog spunog A4x1¢ < ‘gun 04 payuasard SxOYONIOA ay} YALA 41 paredu10d pue yuNodoe aAoge ot} poutuexe avy T € — 0 L P b 3eeF { sseevereveeesgaQTOUIOY} VAY} PUL PULYS ane -rajomIoMIIay} 10f AoysayjoIM\ Ploy Woy “ L 166 g L 93“ Staqjo pue suerotjdQ wou 0 iy 64 eeeveceacese Ayempy ayy wosy 0 OL SIl'' 2PerL JO prwog ayy Woy} ‘p *S F—SPMIUMAZsUT JO WOMLOYLAA oy} 1OF 0 O0G “Tt Jomseary, Terauax OG} WOT peartsooy 9G ceettettesteeeseeetereeerseers gumog0@ 4Se] WOT} gourreq °F “ “SLdIGOTa be 5 GR eee Be bos Be PES 8 ee Be 8 ee ee SOESt ‘9 ‘inp 11 ‘GG8L ‘SI day Wott uorgDLd0Ss 7 YS ay? fo aaywUwUo?dy nay a2 fo eect < XXXVIil REPORT—1856. 1 Report of the Parliamentary Committee of the British Association to the Meeting at Cheltenham in August 1856. The Parliamentary Committee have the honour to report as follows :— We have the pleasure of announcing that one very important subject to which our labours have been directed has been materially advanced since the date of our last Report; we allude to the juxtaposition of the Scientific Societies of London in a convenient and central locality. The main building at Burlington House has been placed by the Govern- ment at the disposal of the Royal Society, on the understanding that they accommodate the Linnean and Chemical Societies with rooms therein; and the West Wing will be converted into a capacious Hall, which is to be occu- pied by the Royal Society at all times when it is not required for the examinations and public meetings of the University of London. We trust that the period is not far distant in which permanent accommo- dation will be afforded to all the principal Scientific Societies in buildings to be erected near the same site, and in pursuance of some general plan. Your Committee, however, anticipate most important advantages to Science from the present partial adoption by the Government of the principle of juxtaposition ; and our Chairman has in his address to the Royal Society on the occasion of their last Anniversary, alluded to the benefits likely to accrue from this salutary measure. In the same Address also will be found a Summary of our labours since our complete organization in 1851, a perusal of which will show to what extent the proceedings of cur Committee have justified the anticipations of those who promoted its formation. During the past year two subjects have been referred to us, viz.: — Ist. The question of the expenses incurred by Scientific Institutions not incorporated in appointing new trustees of their property, when vacancies occur. And, 2ndly. We were requested by your Council in January last to support an application to Parliament, in reference to lighting Kew Ob- servatory with gas, when made by the Chief Commissioner of Woods. The first subject above adverted to has been considered by us, and we shall resume its discussion when an opportunity offers for remedying the evil. With respect to the second, we must refer to the Report of the Kew Committee for an explanation of the reasons which have made it impossible for us to render that species of assistance, which was contemplated at th time when the reference was made to us. The most important subject of our last Report, viz. the question “ whether any measures could be adopted by the Government or Parliament that would improve the position of Science or its Cultivators?” has since its discussion at Glasgow been again considered by us; and during the last Session of Parliament it was brought before the House of Commons by Mr. Heywood, as an individual Member of the House, and not as representing your Committee. The discussion of our Report by the Committee of Recommendations at Glasgow in September last, the result of the debate which took place in the House of Commons on the occasion last referred to, and subsequent communications with Members of the Legislature, have combined to convince us— 1st. That men of science have as yet formed no definite opinion on the important question raised in the Report. RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GENERAL COMMITTEE. xxXxix And 2ndly. That until such a result be attained, it is improbable that any important improvement will be effected in the position of Science or its Cultivators either through the agency of the Government or Parliament. It is desirable therefore that some measures should be adopted, which may be instrumental in inducing scientific men generally to apply their minds to the consideration of these questions, and to agree upon some definite proposals :—We therefore recommend that the subject should be again brought before the Committee of Recommendations. Meanwhile the General Committee will be gratified on learning that the importance of the question has been recognized by the Council of the Royal Society, who have referred its consideration to the Government Grant Committee. That Committee have appointed a Sub-Committee, consisting of the President and Officers of the Royal Society and seven other Members, who will meet on the 7th of October for the purpose of discussing the subject prior to the reassembling of the Society after the recess. _ Your Committee recommend for the consideration of the General Com- mittee, whether it would be expedient to relax the rule by which vacancies in our Committee must be filled up exclusively from Members of the British Association, so far as to admit Members of either House of Parliament, who have advanced the interests of Science. - Your Committee also recommend that two vacancies in our body, caused by the non-attendance of the Earl Cathcart and Sir J. V. Bb. Johnstone, Bart., during two consecutive years, be filled by the election of the Earl of Burlington and Lord Stanley, Member of Parliament for King’s Lynn. 25 July, 1856. WrotresLey, Chairman. RECOMMENDATIONS ADOPTED BY THE GENERAL CoMMITTEE AT THE CHELTENHAM MEETING 1n Aucust 1856. [When Committees are appointed, the Member first named is regarded as the Secretary of the Committee, except there be a specific nomination.] Involving Grants of Money. - That the sum of £350 be placed at the disposal of the Council for main- taining the Establishment and providing for the continuance of Special Re- searches at Kew. That Mr. F. Osler be requested to continue his reduction of Anemome- trical Observations ; with £20 at his disposal for the purpose. That Mr. R. W. Fox be requested to make further Experiments on the Temperature of deep Mines in Cornwall; with £10 at his disposal for the purpose. That Professor N. S. Maskelyne, T. F. Hardwich, and Mr. J. D. Lle- wellyn, be a Committee, with power to add to their number, for the purpose of drawing up a Report on the chemical nature of the image formed in pho- tographic processes ; with £10 at their disposal. _ That Professor Anderson be requested to complete his Report on the com- pounds of Platinum and the allied metals with Ammonia; with £10 at his disposal for the purpose. hat Mr. Mallet be requested to continue his Investigations on Earth- quake Waves; with £50 at his disposal for the purpose. That Professor Phillips and Professor Ramsay be requested to construct a Vertical Column of British Strata, to accompany the Map which has been prepared for the ets an Section; with£15 at their disposal for the purpose. hat Mr. Patterson, Professor Dickie, and Mr. Hyndman, be a Committee, xl REPORT—1856. with power to add to their number, for the purpose of Dredging in the neighbourhood of Belfast; with £10 at their disposal. That the Rev. C. P. Miles, Professor Balfour, Dr. Greville, and Mr. C. Eyton, be a Committee to report on the Dredging of the West Coast of Scot- land; with £25 at their disposal for the purpose. That Dr. Williams, Professor Bell, and Dr. Lankester, be a Committee for the purpose of completing a Report on the British Annelida, with £25 at their disposal. ‘That Mr. Archer and Dr. Dickinson be requested to report on the Vege- table Imports of Liverpool; with £10 at their disposal for the purpose. That Mr. W. Keddie and Mr. Michael Connal be requested to report on the Vegetable Imports of Liverpool; with £10 at their disposal for the purpose. That Professor Henslow, Professor Phillips, Sir W. Jardine, Mr. C. C. Babington, Professor Balfour, Professor Owen, Dr, Hooker, Mr. J. S. Bower- bank, Rev. M. J. Berkeley, Professor Huxley, and Dr. Lankester, be a Com- mittee to report on the best manner of selecting and arranging a series of Typical Objects illustrative of the three Kingdoms of Nature, for Provincial Museums; with £10 at their disposal for the purpose. That Sir W. Jardine, Bart., and Mr. Ashworth, be requested to continue their observations on the Growth of Salmon; with £10 at their disposal for the purpose. That the Rev. P. Carpenter, Dr. Gray, and Mr. C. C. Babington, be a Committee to complete the Report on the Mollusca of California; with £10 at their disposal for the purpose. That Madame Ida Pfeiffer be requested to report on the Natural History of Madagascar; with £20 at her disposal for the purpose. That Mr. G. Rennie be requested to continue his experiments on the pro- duction of Heat by motion in fluids ; with £20 at his disposal for the purpose. That a Committee, consisting of Mr. A. Henderson, Mr. A. Anderson, Captain Sir E. Belcher, Mr. J. R. Napier, Mr. J. Thomson, C.E., Mr. W. Ramsay, C.E., Captain J. O. Owen, and Sir W. Jardine, Bart., be requested to continue the investigation as to the statistics and condition of Life-Boats and Fishing-Boats; as to the principles on which such boats should be con- structed; the essential conditions of their successful use; and the manner of establishing them round the coasts ; with £5 at their disposal for the purpose. Not Involving Grants of Money. Parliamentary Committee. That copies of the two last Reports of the Parliamentary Committee be transmitted to each Member of the General Committee, with a request that opinions may be expressed as to the important subject “whether any measures could be adopted by the Government or Parliament that would improve the position of Science and its Cultivators,” and that such opinion be forwarded for the consideration of the Council before the 20th of September. That the Rule by which vacancies in the Parliamentary Committee must be filled up exclusively from Members of the British Association, be so far relaxed, as to admit Members of either House of Parliament who have advanced the interests of Science. That two vacancies in the Parliamentary Committee, caused by the non- attendance of the Earl Cathcart and Sir J. V. B. Johnstone, Bart., during two consecutive years, be filled by the election of the Earl of Burlington, and Lord Stanley, M.P. for King’s Lynn. Title of Section F. That the ‘ Section of Statistics’ shall in future be entitled ‘ The Section of Economic Science and Statistics.’ RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GENERAL COMMITTEE. xli Involving Applications to Government or Public Institutions. That the application to Government for an Expedition to complete our knowledge of the Tides be renewed. That the application which was made to the Government in September 1852, concerning the great Southern Telescope, be renewed. That a deputation, consisting of Sir R. I. Murchison, Sir H. Rawlinson, General Sabine, Professor Owen, Professor Bell, Dr. Gray, Mr. Macgregor Laird, Dr. R. Latham, and Dr. N. Shaw, be requested to wait upon Her Majesty’s Secretary for Foreign Affairs, to urge the desirableness of sending out an annual expedition to the Niger, at the period of the rising waters of that river (which has been proved to be the most healthy season), as proposed by Dr. Baikie, supported by the Royal Geographical Society, and advocated by persons deeply interested in establishing a regular commercial intercourse with the inhabitants of that portion of Africa. That a Memorial be presented to the Admiralty, praying for the publica- tion in a simple, uniform and complete shape, tabular and descriptive, of the results of the Trials of Her Majesty’s Steam Ships. That the Committee, consisting of Mr. Andrew Henderson, Mr. John Scott Russell, Mr. James R. Napier, and Mr. Charles Atherton, appointed to con- sider the question of the Measurement of Ships for Tonnage, be requested to continue their investigations; that the following names be added to the Committee, The Right Hon. the Earl of Hardwicke, Mr. Arthur Anderson, Rev. Dr. Woolley, Mr. Wm. Mann, Mr. George Frederic Young, Captain J. O. Owen, Professor Woodcroft, and Mr. James Perry; and that they be requested to inquire into the defects of the present methods, and to frame more perfect rules for the measurement and registration of ships; and also as to the adoption of a standard unit for estimating the working power of engines, instead of the present nominal horse-power, in order that a correct and uniform principle of estimating the actual carrying capacity and working power of steam-ships may be adopted in their future registration. (N.B. In this Recommendation the Committees of Section F. and Section G. concurred.) ; That the Earl of Harrowby, Lord Stanley, Mr. William Fairbairn, Mr. Thomas Graham (Master of the Mint), Mr. James Heywood, Mr. Commissioner Hill, General Sabine, and Mr. Thomas Webster, be a Com- mittee for the purpose of taking such steps as may be necessary to render the Patent system of this country, and the funds derived from inventors, more efficient and available for the reward of meritorious inventors, and the ad- vancement of practical science. Applications for Reports and Researches. That Mr. Cayley be requested to complete his Report on the Progress of Theoretical Dynamics. That a Committee, consisting of General Sabine, Professor Phillips, Sir James C. Ross, Mr. Robert W. Fox, and Rev. Dr. Lloyd, be requested to undertake the repetition of the Magnetic Survey of the British Islands, That Dr. Miller be requested to complete his Report on Electro-chemistry. That Dr. Price be requested to complete his Report on Commercial Varieties of Iron. That Professor Buckman and Professor Voelcker be requested to continue their researches into the Effects of External Agents in the Growth of Plants. That Mr. Rennie be requested to prosecute his experiments on the Velo- city of the Screw-propeller, and report on them next year. xlii REPORT—1856. That Mr. Wm. Fairbairn, C.E., be requested to continue his Report on Boiler Explosions. That a Committee, consisting of Mr. James Thomson, C.E., and Mr. Wil- liam Fairbairn, C.E., F.R.S., be requested to continue their investigations on. the Friction of Discs in water and on Centrifugal Pumps. That Mr. James Thomson, C.E., be requested to report further on the Measurement of Water by Weir Boards. Communications to be printed entire among the Reports. That Dr. Booth’s Memoir on the Geometrical origin of Logarithms be printed entire in the Reports of the Association. That Mr. Etheridge’s List of the Fossils from the Lias Bone Bed be printed entire in the Report of the Association’s Proceedings. That the Communication of Dr. Wright, on the Echinodermata of the Oolite, be printed entire iu the Reports of the British Association. That Professor Goodsir’s Paper on the Morphological Constitution of the Skeleton of the Vertebrate Head be printed entire in the Reports of the Association, with such Illustrations as may be necessary. Synopsis of Grants of Money appropriated to Scientific Objects by the General Committee at the Cheltenham Meeting in Aug. 1856, with the name of the Member, who alone, or us the First of a Committee, is entitled to draw for the Money. Kew Observatory. Boa ds At the disposal of the Council for defraying expenses ...... 350 0 O Mathematics and Physics. Oster, F.—Reduction of Anemometrical Observations...... 20 0 O Fox, R. W.—Observations on Subterranean Temperature.... 10 O O Chemical Science. MaskELyneE, Prof.—Chemical Nature of Photographic Image 10 0 0 ANDERSON, Prof.—Compounds of Platinum and other metals With AmmioniA .......ceeresssereee 10 0.0 Geology. Ma.vet, R.—Earthquake Wave Experiments ............ 50 0 0 Puittirs, Prof.—Section of British Strata ..........0..65- 15.0.0 Zoology and Botany. Parrerson, R.—Dredging near Belfast . 10 0 0O Mites, Rev. C. P.—Dredging on the West Coast of Scotland. 25 0 0 Wituiams, Dr.—British Annelida ........ 25 0 0 Arcuer, T. C.—Natural Products imported into Liverpool . 10-620 Kepp1£e, W.—Natural Products imported into Glasgow...... 10 0 O Henstow, Prof.—Typical Forms for Museums ............ 10 0 0 JARDINE, Sir W.—Propagation of Salmon................ 10 0 0 CarpENTER, Rev. P.—Mollusca of California ............ 10 0 O Preirrer, Madame Ida.—Natural History of Madagascar .. 20 0 0 Mechanics. Rennigz, G.—Production of Heat in Fluids ............. re EE Henperson, Andrew.—Life-Boats .......... Path a> clare 5.0 0 Grants,... £620 —_——_e ee eee GENERAL STATEMENT. xliii General Statement of Sums which have been paid on Account of Grants for Scientific Purposes. £ s. d. £ s. d. 1834, Meteorology and Subterranean Tide Discussions .........+..+- 20 0 0 Temperature ......... Riveseenete ea Lie OU Vitrification Experiments......... 9 4 7 4 i ; vidi 0 Cast Iron Experiments............ 100 0 0 Fide Dasqussions sssarersssssserses 62 0 Railway Constants ....... edsee sei cite gle British Fossil Ichthyology... 105 9 0) rang and Sea Level ..........0..., 274 1 4 £167 0 0] Steam-vessels’ Engines ........+... 100 0 0 Stars in Histoire Céleste ....... . d01 18 6 1836. 163 0 0 Stars in Lacaille ...........eeeee0e 11 0 0 Tide Discussions ...s.ssssssseseees Stars in R.A.S. Catalogue......... 616 6 British Fossil Ichthyology . sven 105 0.) 0 Animal Secrétions........0....... « 1010 0 Thermometric Gbscrvationss &c. 50 0 0 Steam-engines i tin Cornwall. ae 50 0 0 Experiments on a apliee vith Atmospheric Air .........ssseeeeee 16 1 0 Heat sree 17 1 0 Cast and Wrought Iron...,...... 40 0 0 Bain Gauges... og les Mey ery bie sl Heat on Organic Bodies ......... 3 0 O peeon La gr ase RS Bes 150 | Gases on Solar Spectrum......... 22 0 0 Lunar Nutation.....+..0..sssssee a , 4 Hourly Meteorological Observa- Thermometers ee = ats tions, Inverness anid! Kirigussie 19 7 8 ossil Reptiles ....... eauiaaeisienise . 1837. Mining Statistics .........00.. _ 7 ; Tide Discussions ........sesesseeee 284 1 0 Chemical Constants ........ seoee 2413 6 Lunar Nutation.......ss0csceees ao 20.0 Of | ? 1840. Observations on Waves......s..ss» 100 12 0 | Bristol Tides.............. sscceesse 100 0 O Tides at Bristol.ssssecsssssseecesees 150 0 0 | Subterranean Temperature ...... 13 13 6 Meteorology and Subterranean Heart Experiments... 18 19 0 Temperature ...ssseseseereereseee 89 5 3 | Lungs Experiments ......0..0. 8 13 0 Vitrification Experiments......... 150 0 0 | Tide Discussions .............0. 50 0 0 Heart Experiments ........ veces 8 4 6 | Land and Sea Level.w............ 6 11 1 Barometric Observations .......... 30 0 0 | Stars (Histoire part ssseseeee 242 10 0 Barometers . ..sssesssseseeeseeees « 11 18 6 | Stars (Lacaille) ....... trttsessreseee 415 0 £918 146 | Stars (Catalogue) . eicvettarss covers 264 0 0 Atmospheric Air .........s00.00. 1515 0 1838. Water on Iron ...... sossecessecsees 10 0 O Tide Discussions s..s....s006.. 29 0 0 | Heat on Organic Bodies ........ 7 0. 0 British Fossil Fishes ...... suse. 100 Q 0 | Meteorological Observations...... 5217 6 ’ Meteorological Observations and Foreign Scientific Memoirs ...,., 112 1 6 Anemometer (construction) ... 100 0 0 | Working Population............... 100 0 0 Cast Iron (Strength of) ..s...468 60 0 0 | School Statistics.................. - 50 0 0 Animal and Vegetable Substances Forms of Vessels seeeeeneesenceees . 184 7 0 (Preservation of) .ss..sss6..0666 19 1 10 | Chemical and Electrical Pheeno- Railway Constants sintptihicniiisaeb 41 12 10 mena seeceeeescases tee eeeteenns » 40 0 0 Bristol Tides......... eaeieoctiiasse .. 50 0 0 | Meteorological Observations at Growth of Plants ........ tomersseen, choy OW 10 Plymouth ..... setseseseeseeeere 80 0 0 Mud in Rivers .....sscsseseeesceees 3 6 6 | Magnetical Observations ......... 185.13 9 Education Committee ......... sews 30) 0) 0 £1546 16 4 Heart Experiments ..... sdgusktnss 5 3 (0 : Land and Sea Level............+6 - 267 8 7 1841, Subterranean Temperature ...... 8 6 0 | Observations on Waves..,......... 80 0 0 Steam-vessels..........005 oeanest «ss 100 0 OJ Meteorology and Subterranean : Meteorological Committee ..... oa co Temperature ..,.......00. tetensee = BO Thermometers ......ccereecseee 16 4 0] Actinometers.c...icscccsesseerreeass 10 0 0 £956 12 2 | Earthquake Shocks ...... sersccosee Lf 7. 0 Acrid Poisons...........6668 Wissecwes 6 0 0 1839. Veins and Absorbents ...........- 3.0 0 Fossil Ichthyology. sesecesseeseeese 110 0 0 | Mudin Rivers ..........ccc000ee 5 0 0 Meteorological Observations at Marine Vanlouy «onssatasascanoncocee 15 12 8 Plymouth 4.0000 seeceeseeeeeese 63 10 0 | Skeleton Maps .......s0.seseeeeeere 20 0 0 Mechanism of Waves ..........., 144 2. 0 | Mountain Barometers J... 618 6 Bristol Tides ......s.eecesseesesee 35 18 6} Stars (Histoire Céleste).,.0000 185 0 0 xliv REPORT—1856. £ s, d. Gi 8.>.d. Stars (Lacaille) ...cccsssssessseeesee 79 5 0 | Meteorological Observations, Os- Stars (Nomenclature ides beseweuss 1719.6 ler’s Anemometer at Plymouth 20 0 0 Stars (Catalogue of) ........s00206. 40 0 0 | Reduction of Meteorological Ob- Water on Iron .........eeee, 50 0 0 SETVAtiONS .....ccccescseceeesssses GU O O Meteorological Observations at Meteorological Instruments and TMVerness:’ ..s.ce.sesceesense eee 20 0 0 Gratuities ....cs.ccccccessssocecns ud 6 0 Meteorological Observations (re- Construction of Anemometer at Auction Of) ..cccccccscsseroncere 29 0 O Inverness ....ccccscccccsrsseveeess 06 12 2 Fossil Reptiles .....ssecaseeeseseeee 50 © 0 | Magnetic Co-operation ............ 10 8 10 Foreign Memoirs ......+++-sss00008 62 0 0 | Meteorological Recorder for Kew Railway Sections ......sseesessses eee. Oo Observatory .ce..tcccccccrseerese 30 O O Forms of Vessels ......seeeeess08-. 193 12 0 | Action of Gases on Light......... 18 16 1 Meteorological Observations at Establishment at Kew Observa- Plymouth .....ccceseeeees Sender De OO tory, Wages, Repairs, Furni- Magnetical Observations ........ a fol 18S ture and Sundries.........0... 138 4 7 Fishes of the Old Red Sandstone 100 0 0] Experiments by Captive Balloons 81 8 0 Tides at Leith .......60...00e Spence 50 0 0] Oxidation ofthe Rails of Railways 20 0 0 Anemometer at Edinburgh ...... 69 1 10] Publication of Report on Fossil Tabulating Observations ..,..... 9 6 3&8 Reptiles...... senceuae dcecseocesee - 40 0 0 Races of Men ssscsscseecereeeeesee 5 0 0] Coloured cae call of Railway Radiate Animals ...........0-- 2 0 0 Sections ...ccccccccccccsesseeaccoes 140 18.09 £1235 10 11 Registration ‘of “Earthquake —-—- Shocks ...... vevcaccccccccccnses «. °-30, 0-0 1842. Report on Zoological Nomencla- Dynamometric Instruments ...... 113 11 2 TUTE veeseeees steeee wee 10 0 0 Anoplura Britanniz ..,............ 52 12 0 Uncovering Lower Red Sand- Tides at Bristol............s0e0--. 59 8 O stone near Manchester... 4 4 6 Gases on Light ..........s000 seuss 30 14 7 | Vegetative Power of Seeds «4. 5 3 8 Chronometers ......+0+0+ eaavecea=s 26 17 6 | Marine Testacea (Habits of ) 10 0 0 Marine Zoology.........+0+00+ eee 1 5 0 | Marine Zoology..........+. seesseee 10 0 0 British Fossil Mammalia .....0... 100 0 0 | Marine Zoology.....-.csesesereeee 2 14 11 Statistics of Education .......... .. 20 0 0 | Preparation of Report on British Marine Steam-vessels’ Engines... 28 0 0 Fossil Mammalia seeeeneeecovens 100 0 0 Stars (Histoire Céleste)........... 59 0 0 | Physiological Operations of Me- Stars (Brit. Assoc. Cat. of) ...... 110 0 0 dicinal Agents co susgecepsccenven MOOIONREE Railway Sections .........+ sesseeee 161 10 0 | Vital Statistics ..cessessrrroeee 36 5 8 British Belemnites......+0+..+.0++8 50 0 0 | Additional Experiments on the Fossil Reptiles (publication of Forms of Vessels pidedes ccnusceameini Oe Cusne RREpOrt) ..cc-cconccsevcacescaposeae 210 0 0 Additional Experiments on the Forms of Vessels ssssseeeeeeees .... 180 0 | _ Forms of Vessels «..+0+...414.. 100 0 0 Galvanic Experiments on Rocks 5 6 | Reduction of Experiments on the Meteorological Experiments at Forms of Vessels ....seseseeeeee 100 0 0 Plymouth "cists.cscceccencceeepsea) 08 0 0 Morin’s Instrument and Constant Constant Indicator and Dynamo- Indicator *.vevsicc.sssecesasesaess OD L4AQ metric Instruments ........e. 90 0 0 | Experiments on the Strength of Force of Wid wsessccssesseesseeeee 10 0 0 | Materials ...cocesssersereeererere 60 0 0 Light on Growth of Seeds ...... 8 O 0 £1565 10 2 Vital Statistics ....... siecneencassnmys (DNL. Oveuil = Vegetative Power of Seeds ...... 8 1 11 1844, Questions on Human Race ......__7 9 | Meteorological Observations at £1449 17 8 Kingussie and Inverness....... 12 0 0Q ————= | Completing Observations at Ply- 1843, DOOMED, ecrasascoxecatecevssessscces ma), Olan Revision of the Nomenclature of Magnetic and Meteorological Co- EATS iepsasebepescasaccaphsvensnreca, uu UL 0 OPETAtlON c.ccecccevaceeoece soovee 20 § 4 Reduction of Stars, British Asso- Publication of the British Asso- ciation Catalogue ....+e..sses0ee 25 0:0 ciation Catalogue of Stars.....,. 35 0 0 Anomalous Tides, Frith of Forth 120 0 0] Observations on Tides on the Hourly Meteorological Observa- East coast of Scotland ..,,..... . 100 0 0 tionsat KingussieandInverness 77 12 8 | Revision of the Nomenclature of Meteorological Observations at Stars .eccsccccsevssceccseennedG42 2 9 6 Plymouth ..e.sececssseeessesseeee 5D 0 0} Maintaining the Establishment in Whewell’s Meteorological Ane- Kew Observatory .seossseeseose 117 17 3 mometer at Plymouth .,....... 10 0 0 Instruments for Kew Obserwatory 56 7 3 GENERAL STATEMENT. ry : £s. a. Influence of Light on Plants...... 10 0 0 Subterraneous Temperature in Treland c.cscccsssssssececcseereee, 5 0 0 Coloured Drawings of Railway eeieann <5. scavesdasunctsnepstens, 20 10: 6 Investigation of Fossil Fishes of the Lower Tertiary Strata ... 100 0 0 Registering the Shocks of Earth- Quakes ....ssoorssrrseseeeee L842 23 11 10 Structure of Fossil Shells......... 20 0 0 Radiata and Mollusca of the #egean and Red Seas.....1842 100 0 0 Geographical Distributions of Marine Zoology.....+...+++ 1842 010 0 Marine Zoology of Devon and Cornwall ....ssececeeeeseevees ww 10 0 0 Marine Zoology of Corfu......... 10 0 0 Experiments on the Vitality of Rede istesiesctscteheestoswe |) Olas Experiments on the Vitality of eb ERM RES ered TS RII ee Exotic Anoplura ...sceeeeee 15 0 0 Strength of Materials ......+ss+0 100 0 0 Completing Experiments on the Forms of Ships ....sssseeeeeeeeee 100 0 0 Inquiries into Asphyxia .....+. 10 0 0 Investigations on the Internal Constitution of Metals ..... w. 50 0 0 Constant Indicator and Morin’s Instrument, 1842 ..ccccrereonees 10 3 6 £981 12 8 1845. Publication of the British Associa- tion Catalogue of Stars......... 851 14 6 Meteorological Observations at Inverness ..covcrecescenssers we» =80 18 11 Magnetic and Meteorological Co- OPCTAtiON ssesessesceecersereeener 1616 8 Meteorological Instruments at Edinburgh .......sesssccossesseeees 18 11 9 Reduction of Anemometrical Ob- servations at Plymouth.......-. 25 0 0 Electrical Experiments at Kew Observatory vescccrercesssceeeeee 43 17 ‘8 Maintaining the Establishment in Kew Observatory ...sscssseereee 149 15 0 For Kreil’s Barometrograph...... 25 0 0 Gases from Iron Furnaces ...... 50 0 0 The Actinograph ss. 15 0 0 Microscopic Structure of Shells... 20 0 0 Exotic Anoplura ..-.....++--1843 10 0 0 Vitality of Seeds.......++....+.1843 2 0 7 Vitality of Seeds ......+0...1844 7 0 0 Marine Zoology of Cornwall...... 10 0 0 Physiological Action of Medicines 20 0 0 Statistics of Sickness and Mor- tality in York ...cceseceessesere 20 0 O Earthquake Shocks .,.......1843 15 14 8 £830 9 9 1846. British Association Catalogue of Stars Ser easenataaverentveneni Ora 211 15 0 xiv £5. d. Fossil Fishes of the London Clay 100 0 0 Computation of the Gaussian Constants for 1839... 50 0 0 Maintaining the Establishment at Kew Observatory «sssesesssseeee 146 16 7 Strength of Materials.. ...........- 60 0 0 Researches in Asphyxiass.e 6 16 2 Examination of Fossil Shells...... 10 0 0 Vitality of Seeds .......s00061844 2 15 10 Vitality of Seeds .......++..1845 712 3 Marine Zoology of Cornwall...... 10 0 0 Marine Zoology of Britain ...... 10 0 0 Exotic Anoplura .........++:1844 25 0 0 Expenses attending Anemometers 11 7 6 Anemometers’ Repairs... 2 3 6 Atmospheric Waves ....... Pears i eet Captive Balloons ............1844 819 3 Varieties of the Human Race 1844 7 6 38 Statistics of Sickness and Mor- tality in York wssseereeeeereee 12 0 0 £685 16 0 SS ————— 1847. Computation of the Gaussian Constants for 1839 ,...0..... 50 0 0 Habits of Marine Animals ...... 10 0 0 Physiological Action of Medicines 20 0 0 Marine Zoology of Cornwall ... 10 0 0 Atmospheric Waves .se.ccccreseere 6 9 8 Vitality of Seeds .....-..04 viieek TAN im, e Maintaining the Establishment at Kew Observatory ssssssseereee 107 8 6 £208 5 4 1848. Maintaining the Establishment at Kew Observatory ...s+sssseeee » 171 15 11 Atmospheric Waves ..... setnitenienrt on LUnL Vitality of Seeds ...... Seistesaiss sles 915 0 Completion of Catalogues of Stars 70 0 0 On Colouring Matters ....0.... 5 0 0 On Growth of Plants........0.....- 15 0 0 £275 1 8 1849. Electrical Observations at Kew Observatory sasecccrsrseerrereee 50 0 0 Maintaining Establishment at GittO ...cecseececseeeescessceces - 76 2 5 Vitality of Seeds wescesrrreereee 5 8 1 On Growth of Plants.........sss00e 5 0 0 Registration of Periodical Phe- NOMENA 22. .eeseeeee secesee Sembee 10 0 0 Bill on account of Anemometrical Observations .eessseceesseeserreee 13 9 0 £159 19 6 1850. Maintaining the Establishment at Kew Observatory ..sscesssereeee 255 18 0 50 0 0 Transit of Earthquake Waves... xlvi -- REPORT—I856, ~ a G3. d. | a etecoes Periodical Phenomena........... 15 0 0 1854. Meteorological Instrument, Maintaining the Establishment at Azores .e.,,.+6 disdeditervegdeatts BOenOr 0 Kew Observatory (including £345 18 0 balance of former grant) ...... 8330 15 4 Investigations on Flax ............ 11 0 0 1851. Effects of Temperature on Maintaining the Establishment at Wrought Iron ........... saoscey RaimU a0 Kew Observatory (includes part Registration of Periodical Phe- of grant in 1849) ...... Peostgese CUS RU SD ae nomena ...... tr eT kee Oe Theory of Heat ....cccccccssseeeeeee 20 1 17) British Annelida ......... eaasenniam: 110) aie Periodical Phenomena of Animals Vitality of Seeds ...cccccreserseee 5 2 38 apd Plants vat eetsesesscesss orwee - 5& QO 0} Conduction of Heat ,....000... 4 2 0 Vitality of Seeds .....s, Seeceeaeeset) OO te $330 19 7 Influence of Solar Radiation,..... 30 0 0 ee Ethnological Inquiries ............ 12 0 0 1855. Researches on Annelida ......... 10 0 0 Maintaining the Establishment at £391 9 7 Kew Observatory cervsssssreeere 425 0 0 Earthquake Movements ...., saves LUO 1852. Physical Aspect of the Moon...... IL 8 5 Maintaining the Establishment at Vitality of Seeds ...........seeee Sree ie ye sy! Kew Observatory (including Map of the World......... wos tguses, cp ool 10 balance of grant for 1850) ... 233 17 8 | Ethnological Queries .,,.,....... 5 0 0 Experiments on the Conduction Dredging near Belfast .,,..-..,.... 4 0 0- OL Heat, ...cdescccensgevasoneresces 5; «2: 9 £480 16 4 Influence of Solar Radiations ... 20 0 0 Geological Map of Ireland ...... 15 0 0 1856. Researches on the British Anne- Maintaining the Establishment at Vida. fize se ciwacginctetres-Seesenes cern OrGO) WO Kew Observatory :-— Vitality of Seeds ......ccccceceeeee 10 6 2 1854,...0.£ 75 0 0 Strength of Boiler Plates ..... sch OncOig/0 1855......£500 0 ie 575 0 0 £304 6 7 | Strickland’s Ornithological Syno- nyMs ...... SosisaveadheegasseanessesttlU0) © Oma 1853. Dredging and Dredging Forms, veo VM BOD Maintaining the Establishment at Chemical Action of Light......... 20 0 0 Kew Observatory ......s.sseeees 165 0 0] Strength of Iron Plates.,.......... 10 0 0 Experiments on the Influence of Registration of Periodical Phzeno- Solar Radiation ....e.cccccrcee 15 0 0 MENA seeee aos Sacdssvvecasetucescssin BQUDUEED Researches on the British Anne- Propagation of Salmon weeerseess 10 0 O didavoduleveclse'scccqanesats saanteas oeiMOlianO. sb) £734 13 9 Dredging on the East Coast of ——— NCOtlAndsyacassevacacenagvasens eine LOO, 20 Ethnological Queries... 5 0 0 £205 0 0 Extracts from Resolutions of the General Committee. Committees and individuals, to whom grants of money for scientific pur- poses have been entrusted, are required to present to each following meeting of the Association a Report of the progress which has been made; with a statement of the sums which have been expended, and the balance which re- mains disposable on each grant. Grants of pecuniary aid for scientific purposes from the funds of the Asso- ciation expire at the ensuing meeting, unless it shall appear by a Report that the Recommendations have been acted on, or a continuation of them be ordered by the General Committee. In each Committee, the Member first named is the person entitled to call on the Treasurer, John Taylor, Esq., 6 Queen Street Place, Upper Thames Street, London, for such portion of the sum granted as may from time to time be required. — GENERAL MEETINGS. xlvii _ In grants of money to Committees, the Association does not contemplate the payment of personal expenses to the Members. In all cases where additional grants of money are made for the continua- tion of Researches at the cost of the Association, the sum named shall be deemed to include, as a part of the amount, the specified balance which may remain unpaid on the former grant for the same object. General Meetings. On Wednesday, Aug. 6th, at 8 p.m., in the College, the Duke of Argyll resigned the office of President to C. G. B. Daubeny, M.D., F.R.S., Professor of Botany in the University of Oxford, who took the Chair at the General _ Meeting, and delivered an Address, for which see p. xlviii. On Thursday Evening, Aug. 7th, a Conversazione and Musical Promenade took place at the Pittville Spa. On Friday, Aug. 8th, at 84 P.M. in the College, Col. Sir H. Rawlinson, F.R.S., delivered a Discourse on Recent Discovéries in Assyria and Baby- lonia, with the results of Cuneiform Research up to the present time. On Saturday Evening, Aug. 9th, a Conversazione was held in the College. On Monday, Aug. 11th, at 83 p.m., in the College, W. R. Grove, Esq., M.A., F.R.S,, delivered a Discourse on the Correlation of Physical Forces, On Tuesday, Aug. 12th, at 54 p.m., the Members dined together in the Music Hall of the Royal Old Well, the President, Prof, Daubeny, in the Chair. On Wednesday, Aug. 18th, at 3 p.m., the concluding General Meeting took place in the College, when the Proceedings of the General Committee, and the Grants of Money for scientific purposes, were explained to the Menibers. The Meeting was then adjourned to Dublin*. * The Meeting is appointed to take place on Wednesday, the 26th of August, 1857. ADDRESS BY CHARLES DAUBENY, M.D., F.R.S., Proressor oF BoTANY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF OxFoRD, GENTLEMEN OF THE BritTiIsH ASSOCIATION, ExactLy twenty years have elapsed since the time when, as one of the Local Secretaries of this Institution, at the Meeting held in Bristol, it became my- province to lay before the Members present a Report on the progress of Physical Science, more especially with reference to the subjects that had been treated of in the last volume of our Transactions. And it was with uo assumed feeling of humility that I expressed on that occasion my lively sense of the responsibility of the task imposed upon me, and of my own feeble qualifications for its execution. _ It is, however, with a much more pervading consciousness of my defi- ciencies that I appear at the present time, when, addressing you as the Pre- sident of this great Body, I see before me similar duties committed to me to discharge. On the former occasion, indeed, I was at least encouraged by the reflection, that however eminent those who had preceded me in the drawing up of such reports might have been,—and doubtless there were amongst them some of our most valued associates,—still, as the task had up to that time been con- fided to the Local Secretaries, it was one to which persons of humbler preten- sions might aspire; nor was the general Body likely itself to be compromised by any remarks that emanated from one of its subordinate Officers. But I now stand before you in quite a different capacity, following as I do in the wake of a long train of distinguished individuals, several of whom, indeed, as was the case with my own immediate predecessor, added to the recommendation of extensive scientific and literary attainments, the prestige of exalted rank and eminent social position; whilst of the remainder many had been peculiarly marked out for such a post, either on the ground of their own contributions to Science, or on that of the depth and range of their information in some of its highest departments. a: In my own case, on the contrary, I cannot but feel, that this important office has been imposed upon me, chiefly on account of my position as the Senior amongst the Professors of Physical Science in a neighbouring Uni- ADDRESS. xlix versity, which doubtless deserves the gratitude of this Association, for the support rendered to it, when such fostering care was most needed, in the infancy of its existence. And if other reasons for the selection are sought for, I would refer it also to the accident of my birth, and to the partiality of my friends in the County where we are now assembled, to whom I flatter myself it may be a matter of satisfaction, to see thus distinguished, an individual whom they regard as one of themselves, and one too who owes his position in life, and his capa- bility of indulging in those studies which here engage us, mainly to the good fortune of attaining, in the University alluded to, a Gloucestershire Fellow- ship. With respect indeed to any personal claims I have to prefer for occupying so distinguished a post, the most that could be alleged in my behalf is the having from the commencement of this Association done what I could to pro- mote its success, and to enlist others in its service; persuaded, as I have ever been, that it could not fail to prove a most efficient instrument for the further- ance of scientific objects, not only through the direct influence of its Meetings in promoting a friendly intercourse and a free interchange of opinions amongst those devoted to kindred pursuits, but also indirectly, by engaging the Public in various useful undertakings, which Science indeed might have suggested, but which the Nation alone was capable of carrying into effect. And that these anticipations have been borne out by the result, would now seem to be generally admitted from the fact, that other Societies, since organized in this country with a view to similar objects, have been uniformly framed after its model, and conducted upon principles which they have borrowed from this Institution. It is indeed rather remarkable, that the first idea of an Association of such a kind should have suggested itself only a year after death had deprived us of our three most distinguished philosophers,—for who had we then left to com- pare, with Davy for the brilliancy and importance of his discoveries ; with Young for the singular union of almost universal acquirements with ad- mirable powers of invention; and with Wollaston for an acuteness of mental vision, which gave him the same advantage in the pursuits of science, which the Naturalist armed with a microscope has over the unassisted observer ? Just as in the animal ceconomy the vis medicatrix nature sometimes makes an extraordinary effort to repair the damage inflicted by injury or disease ; so it would seem, as if Science, conscious of the loss she had sustained in the almost simultaneous extinction of her three brightest luminaries, endeavoured to make good the deficiency, by concentrating into one focus those that yet remained, to light her onwards on her path. At any rate, the progress which the Natural Sciences have made since that period, although doubtless attributable to several concurrent causes, is a fact which must not be overlooked in estimating the services rendered by this Association to the cause of human advancement; nor can I in any better manner point out its value, than by bringing before your notice some of the additions to our knowledge which have been made since I last addressed you, especially considering, that not a few of the discoveries to which I shall allude were either first announced, or have been made the subjects of discussion, at our several Meetings. Beginning then with Chemistry, as the subject with which I am most familiar, let me remind you, that at a period not much more remote than the one alluded to, all of it that could be quoted as really worthy the name of a Science was comprehended within the limits of the mineral kingdom. 1856. 1 REPORT=*1856. Here at least the outline had been traced out with sufficient precision— the general laws established on a firm basis—the nomenclature framed with logical exactness—the facts consistent with each other, and presented in a scientific and luminous form. Thus a philosopher, like Sir Humphry Davy, who had contributed in so eminent a degree to bring the science into this satisfactory condition, might, at the close of his career, have despaired of adding anything worthy of his name to the domain of chemistry, and have sighed for other worlds to subdue. But there was a World almost as little known to the chemists of that period as was the Western Hemisphere to the Mavedonian Conqueror,— one comprising an infinite variety of important products, called into exist- ence by the mysterious operation of the vital principle, and therefore placed, as was imagined, almost beyond the reach of experimental research. This is the new World of Chemistry, which the continental philosophers in the first instance, and subsequently those of our own country, have during the last twenty years been busy in exploring, and by so doing have not only bridged over the gulf which had before separated by an impassable barrier the kingdoms of inorganic and of organic nature, but also have added pro- vinces as extensive and as fertile as those we were in possession of before, to the patrimony of Science. It is indeed singular, that whilst the supposed elements of mineral bodies are very numerous, the combinations between them should be comparatively few; whereas amongst those of vegetable and animal origin, where the ulti- mate elements are so limited in point of number, the combinations which they form appear almost infinite. Carbon and hydrogen, for instance, con- stitute, as it were, the keystone of every organic fabric; whilst oxygen, nitro- gen, and less frequently sulphur and phosphorus, serve almost alone to build up their superstructure. And yet what an infinity of products is brought about by ringing the changes upon this scanty alphabet! Even one series of bodies alone, that known by the name of the Fatty Acids, comprises several hundred well- ascertained combinations, founded however upon a single class of hydro- carbons or compound radicals, in which the carbon and hydrogen stand to each other in equal atomic proportions, and are in each case acidified by the same number of equivalents of oxygen. These acids are all monobasic, or combine with only one proportion of base; but add to any one of them two equivalents of carbonic acid, and you obtain a member of a second series, which is bibasic, or is capable of forming two classes of salts. The above therefore constitute a double series, as it were, of organic acids, the members of which are mutually related in the manner pointed out, and differ from each other in their mode of combining according to the relation between their respective elements. But already, by the labours of Hofmann and of other chemists, two other double series of acids, the one monobasic the other bibasic, mutually related exactly in the same manner as those above, have been brought to light ; each series no doubt characterized by an equally numerous appendage of alcohols, of ethers, and of aldehydes, to say nothing of the secondary compounds resulting from the union of each of these bodies with others. Hence the more insight we obtain into the chemistry of organic substances, the more we become bewildered with their complexity, and in investigating these phenomena, find ourselves in the condition of the explorer of a new continent, who, although he might see the same sun over his head, the same ocean rolling. at his feet, the same geological structure in the rocks + : ADDRESS. li that were piled around him, and was thus assured that he still continued a denizen of his own planet, and subject to those physical laws to which he had been before amenable, yet at every step he took was met by some novel object, and startled with some strange and portentous production of Nature’s fecundity. Even so the chemist of the present day, whilst he recognizes in the world of organic life the same general laws which prevail throughout the mineral kingdom, is nevertheless astonished and perplexed by the multiplicity of new bodies that present themselves, the wondrous changes in them resulting from slight differences in molecular arrangement, and the simple nature of the machinery by which such complicated effects are brought about. And as the New World might never have been discovered, or, at all events, would not have been brought under our subjection, without those improve- ments in naval architecture which had taken place prior to the age of Columbus, so the secrets of organic chemistry would have long remained unelicited, but for the facilities in the methods of analysis which were introduced by Liebig. Before his time the determination of the component elements of an organic substance was a task of so much skill as well as labour, that only the most accomplished analysts—such men, for instance, as my lamented friend Dr. Prout in this country, or as the great Berzelius in Sweden—could be de- pended upon for such a work; and hence the data upon which we could rely for deducing any general conclusions went on accumulating with extreme slowness. : But the new methods of analysis invented by Liebig have so simplified and so facilitated the processes, that a student, after a few months’ practical instruction in a laboratory, can, in many instances, arrive at results sufficiently precise to be made the basis of calculation, and thus to enable the master mind, which is capable of availing itself of the facts before it, to breathe life into these dry numerical details,—just as the sculptor, by a few finishing strokes, brings out the expression of the statue, which has been prepared for him by the laborious chiseling of a number of subordinate workmen. And as the established laws and institutions of the Old World have been modified—may I not say in some instances rectified ?—by the insensible influ- ence of those of the New, so have the principles that had been deduced from the phenomena of the mineral kingdom undergone in many instances a cor- rection from the new discoveries made in the chemistry of the animal and vegetable creation. It was a great step indeed in the progress of the Science, when Lavoisier set the example of an appeal to the balance in all our experimental re- searches, and the Atomic Theory of Dalton may be regarded as the necessary, although somewhat tardy, result of the greater numerical precision thus in- troduced. But no less important was the advance achieved, when structure and _ polarity were recognized as influencing the condition of matter, and when the nature of a body*was felt to be determined, not only by the proportions of its component elements, but also by their mutual arrangement and colloca- tion—a principle, which, first illustrated amongst the products of organic life, has since been found to extend alike to all chemical substances what- soever. Formerly it had been the rule to set down the bodies which form the con- stituents of the substances we analysed, and which had never yet under our hands undergone decomposition, as elementary; but the discovery of cyanogen in the first instance, and the recognition of several other com- d2 li : REPORT—1856. pound radicals in organic chemistry more lately, naturally suggest the idea, that many of the so-called elements of inorganic matter may likewise be compounds, differing from the organic radicals above mentioned merely in their constituents being bound together by a closer affinity. And this conjecture is confirmed by the curious numerical relations sub- sisting between the atomic weights of several of these supposed elements ; as, for example, between chlorine, bromine and iodine; an extension of the grand generalization of Dalton, which, although it was unforeseen by the Founder of the system, and therefore, like Gay-Lussac’s theory of volumes, might very possibly have been repudiated by him, had it been proposed for his acceptance, will be regarded by others as establishing, in a manner more conclusive than before, the soundness of his antecedent deductions. What, indeed, can be a greater triumph for the theorist, than to find that a law of nature which he has had the glory of establishing by a long and painful process of induction, not only accommodates itself to all the new facts which the progress of discovery has since brought to light, but is itself the consequence of a still more general and comprehensive principle, which philosophers, even at this distance of time, are still engaged in unfolding ? It is also curious to reflect, that whilst the bold speculations of Democritus have been realized by the Manchester philosopher, the reveries of the alchemists derive something like solid support from the minute investigations of his successors. We may remark indeed as not a little remarkable, how frequently the discoveries of modern days have served to redeem the fancies of medieval times from the charge of absurdity. If the direction of a bit of steel suspended near the earth can, as General Sabine has proved, be influenced by the position of a body like the moon, situated at a distance from it of more than 200,000 miles, who shall say that there was anything preposterously extravagant in the conception, however little support it may derive from experience, that the stars might exert an influence over the destinies of man? and when we observe a series of bodies, exhibiting, as it would seem, a gradation of properties, and, although as yet undecompounded, possessing a common numerical relation one to the other, who will deny the probability, that they are composed of the same consti- tuents, however little approach we may have as yet made towards the art of resolving them into their elements, or of forming them anew ? Organic chemistry has also considerably modified our views with respect to chemical affinity. According to one view, indeed, which has been supported of late with con- siderable talent and ingenuity, the law of elective attraction, to which we have been in the habit of referring all the changes that are brought about by chemical means, is a mere figment of the imagination ; and decomposition may be accounted for, without the interference of any such force, by re- garding it simply as the result of that constant interchange which is supposed to be going on between the particles of matter,—the atoms even of a solid body being, according to this hypothesis, in a state of irfcessant motion. But passing over these and other speculations which have not as yet re- ceived the general assent of chemists, let me advert to others of an older date, possessing, as I conceive, the strongest internal evidence in their favour, which the case admits, from the harmony they tend to introduce into the chaos of facts which the late discoveries in organic chemistry have brought to light. Amongst these, one of the most generally received, and at the same time one of the most universal application, is that which represents the several combinations resulting from organic forces, as being put together according: ADDRESS. li to a particular model or type, which impresses upon the aggregate formed certain common properties, and also causes it to undergo change most readily, through the substitution of some other element in the place of one of those which already enters into its constitution. And this principle, having been established with regard to one class of bodies, has since been extended to the rest; for it now begins to be main- tained, that in every case of chemical decomposition a new element is intro- duced in the place of one of those which constituted a part of the original compound, so that the addition of a fresh ingredient is necessarily accom- panied by the elimination of an old one. The same doctrine, too, has even been extended to the case of combination with a body regarded as elementary, for here also the particles are considered as being in a state of binary combination one with the other, owing perhaps to their existing in opposite electrical conditions, and therefore possessing for each other a certain degree of chemical affinity. Thus, when we unite hydrogen with oxygen, we substitute an atom of the latter for one of the former, previously combined with the same element. The type therefore remains, although the constituents are different. When, in the formation of alcohol, we combine the oxide of the compound radical zthyle with water, there is still only a substitution of the former for one of the atoms of water previously united together, two and two; and when we form ether, we eliminate the second atom of water, and replace it by another atom of the same compound radical. Thus the type of water still remains, although none of the materials of the original fabric continue ; or, if I may adopt the metaphor of a building, although the original bricks which composed the structure may have been all replaced by other materials, the latter, however differing in their nature, always correspond, in point of shape, dimensions, and number, with the parts of the edifice which have been removed to make way for them. It is on this principle that Professor Williamson has propounded a new theory of ztherification, regarding the process as resulting from the alternate replacement of hydrogen by ethyle, and of ethyle by hydrogen, in the sulphuric acid concerned,—a view, which best harmonises with the composi- tion of the new ether he hit upon in the course of his investigations. The same principle may even be extended to bodies of the same type as ammonia; for inasmuch as this body is made up of a union of an atom of nitrogen with three of hydrogen, it is easy to conceive that a variety of different compounds might be formed by the substitution of one, two, or three atoms of other radicals for the same number of atoms of the original hydrogen. How beautifully this idea has been carried out in the recent researches of Hofmann, and how happily it serves to elucidate the formation of the various vegetable alkaloids, which, from their energetic action upon the animal ceconomy, have of late excited so much interest in the public mind, is sufficiently known to those who are chemists, and could not be rendered intelligible to those who are not, without entering into details which would be out of place on the present occasion. I must not, however, pass over this part of the subject without remarking, that the adoption of Professor Williamson’s othyle theory would establish a still nearer analogy between the constitution of organic and of mineral com- pounds than is at present recognized, since in that case alcohol and ether would stand in the same relation one to the other, and belong to the same class or series, as the acids and their salts. These views, however, and others having reference to the same subject, are now under discussion, and I hope in progress of being worked out by . liv REPORT—1856. the able chemist above alluded to, whose promised Report on this subject, had it been ready for this Meeting, would have superseded the necessity of the above Remarks, They have also engaged the attention of my distin- guished successor in the chair of Chemistry at Oxford, who has published some elaborate researches bearing upon the questions here mooted, whilst on the Continent they have been taken up by several of the most eminent chemists of the day, such as Gerhardt, Wurtz, and Cahours. Should they ultimately win their way to general reception, they must tend to bring about an entire remodeling of our views, both with respect to organic and inorganic compounds, and render that reform in our nomen- clature which I pressed upon the attention of the Chemical Section at our meeting in Ipswich, more than ever a matter of urgent necessity. Many, however, perhaps of my present audience may not have advanced be- yond that initial stage of all speculation, which contemplates external objects solely as they affect themselves, and not abstractedly in their relations to each other; and to such it may be more interesting to consider those practical results bearing upon the arts of life, which have either been actually deduced, or may be anticipated as likely to accrue, from the discoveries in question. OF these perhaps the most important is the possibility of forming by art those compounds, which had been formerly supposed to be only producible by natural processes, under the influence of the vital principle. The last two years have added materially to the catalogue of such bodies artificially produced, as in the formation of several species of alcohol from coal gas by Berthelot, that of oil of mustard by the same chemist, and the generation of taurine, a principle elaborated in the liver, by Strecker. And if the above discoveries should strike you at first sight rather as curious than practically useful, I would remark, that they afford reasonable ground for hope, that the production of some of those principles of high medicinal or ceconomical value, which nature has sparingly provided, or at least limited to certain districts or climates, may lie within the compass of the chemist’s skill. If Quinine, for instance, to which the Peruvian bark owes its efficacy, be, as would appear from recent researches, a modified condition of ammonia, why may not a Hofmann be able to produce it for-us from its elements, as he has already done so many other alkaloids of similar constitution ? And thus, whilst the progress of civilization, and the development of the chemical arts, are accelerating the consumption of those articles, which kind Nature has either been storing up for the uses of man during a vast succession of antecedent ages, or else is at present elaborating for us in that limited area, within which alone the conditions would seem to be such as to admit of their production, we are encouraged to hope that Science may make good the loss she has contributed to create, by herself inventing arti- ficial modes of obtaining these necessary materials, In this case We need not so much regard the exhaustion of our collieries, although Nature appears to have provided no means for replenishing them ; nor even be concerned at the rapid destruction of the trees which yield the Peruvian bark, limited though they be to a very narrow zone, and to a certain definite elevation on either side of the equator, Already, indeed, chemistry has given token of her powers, by threatening to alter the course of commerce, and to reverse the tide of human industry. Thus she has discovered, it is said, a substitute for the cochineal insect, in a beautiful dye producible from guano. __ * ADDRESS. lv She has shown, that our supply of animal food might be obtained at a cheaper rate from the Antipodes, by simply boiling down the juices of the flesh of cattle now wasted and thrown aside in those countries, and importing the extract in ‘a state of concentration. She has pointed out, that one of the earths which constitute the principal material of our globe contains a metal, as light as glass, as malleable and ductile as copper, and as little liable to rust as silver; thus possessing pro- perties so valuable, that when means have been found of separating it ceco- nomically from its ore, it will be capable of superseding the metals in com- mon use, and thus of rendering metallurgy an employment, not of certain districts only, but of every part of the earth to which Science and Civilization have penetrated. And may I not also say, that she has contributed materially towards the advancement of those arts in which an agricultural county like this is espe- cially interested ? Who has not heard of the work of Baron Liebig, which, at the time of its first appearance, made such a sensation throughout the country; and stirred up the dormant energies of the agricultural public, not less thoroughly, than the subsoil plough, of which he explained the advantages, elicited the latent treasures of the land? It is not often that the same individual has reaped a high reputation, at once by establishing general principles in Science, and by rendering popular their application to practice. Oersted, the father of the science of Electro-chemistry, and our own Faraday, who has done so much to develope its principles, left to Wheatstone the invention of the telegraph; Dalton, the propounder of the Atomic Theory, did nothing to improve the manufactures of the city in which he resided ; and the contrivances which have rendered the steam-engine generally appli- cable to practice required a combination of the distinct talents of a Black and a Watt, the one to explain the theory of latent heat, the other to apply it to the ceconomical generation of steam. But Baron Liebig stands equally distinguished for his ingenuity in de- vising new methods of analysis, for his originality in propounding great theoretical principles in Science, and for his happy talent in applying these principles to purposes of practical utility. Like his countrymaa Goethe, his mind seems to have passed through three phases ; for his ingenious methods of analysis were appreciated, before his views on the relation between organic substances, his doctrine of com- pound radicals, and the consequences flowing from his researches in vege- table chemistry, came to be generally admitted ; and the latter had already taken root in the minds of chemists, and had established for hima very high reputation among his fellow-labourers in Science, before his attempts to apply his principles to agriculture and to physiology made his name so celebrated, as it has since been, amongst the public in general. It is well known, that a controversy has been going on for some time past between this distinguished foreigner, and certain experimental agriculturists of our own country, with regard to the principles upon which the manuring of our land ought to be regulated. In this dispute, however, you will not expect me to take part; for it would be obviously improper on the present occasion, that I should avail myself of a little brief authority to influence the public on either side of a much-debated question ; and, indeed, on any other, it might be deemed an act of presumption in an individual, Who can prefer no claim either to the extensive practical experience of the one, or to the high scientific eminence of the other, to take upon himself to adjudicate between two such conflicting parties. lvi REPORT—1856. But I may be permitted to remark, that whilst some points of difference between them still remain open for further investigation, a much nearer correspondence of opinion exists with respect to others, than the public in general, or even perhaps the disputants themselves, are inclined to allow. In so far, indeed, as concerns the relative advantages of mineral and ammoniacal manures, I presume there is little room for controversy; for although most soils may contain a sufficiency of the inorganic constituents required by the crop, it by no means follows that the latter are always in an available condition; and hence it may well happen that in most cases in which land has been long under cultivation, the former class of manures becomes, as Baron Liebig asserts, a matter of paramount necessity. Now that the same necessity exists for the addition of ammoniacal manures can hardly be contended, when we reflect, that at the first commencement of vegetable life, every existing species of plant must have obtained its nourish- ment, solely from the gaseous constituents of the atmosphere, and from the mineral contents of the rock in which it vegetated. The only divergence of opinion therefore that can arise, relates to the degree of their respective utility in the existing state of our agriculture, and to the soundness of Baron Liebig’s position, that a plant rooted in a soil well- charged with all the requisite mineral ingredients, and in all other respects in a condition calculated to allow of healthy vegetation, may sooner or later be able to draw from the atmosphere whatever else is required for its full development. And does not, I would ask, this latter position derive some support from the luxuriant vegetation of the tropics, where art certainly contributes nothing towards the result? and is it not also favoured by such experiments as those carried on at Lois Weedon in Northamptonshire, where the most luxuriant wheat crops have been obtained for a number of consecutive years without manure of any kind, simply by following out the Tullian system of stirring up and pulverizing the soil ? ‘ How, too, are we to explain that capacity of subsisting without any artificial supply of ammonia, which Mr. Lawes is led by his experiments to attribute to turnips, and other plants of similar organization, unless we assume that the power residing in the leaves of absorbing ammonia from the air may render plants, in some cases at least, independent of any extraneous aid ? Be this, however, as it may, there is at least a wide distinction between this opinion, and the one attributed to Baron Liebig by many, who would seem to imagine, that according to his views, ammonia, if derived from arti- ficial sources, was in a manner useless to vegetation. As if it could be a matter of any moment, whether the substance which in both cases afforded the supply of nitrogen, and which in both cases also was primarily derived from the decomposition of organic substances, had been assimilated by plants directly upon its being thus generated, or had been received into their system at a later period, after having been diffused through the atmosphere! To suppose that Baron Liebig should have attached any moment to this distinction seems inconsistent with many passages in his work, in which, although the paramount importance of mineral manures may be insisted upon, and the success which had in certain cases attended the use of one compounded only of mineral ingredients may be put forward as a motive for further trials, the utility of ammoniacal substances in all their several forms is at the same time distinctly admitted. Still the practical question remains, whether, admitting the theoretical truth of Baron Liebig’s position, a larger expenditure of capital will not be required for bringing a given farm into a condition to dispense with ammo- niacal manures, than for procuring those materials which contain that ingre- ADDRESS. lvii dient ready for-use. And here experimental researches, such as those con- ducted on so extended and liberal a scale by Mr. Lawes and Dr. Gilbert, come in aid of theory. They stand, as it were, midway between the abstract principles which Science points out to the farmer, and the traditional usages with respect to his art, which have been handed down to him from one gene- ration to another. They bear the same relation to the farmer, which the records of the clinical practice in a large infirmary do, to the general princi- ples of medicine expounded by the modern physiologist. It is true, that the experience of a particular hospital may not at all times coincide with the anticipations which science holds out; but this discrepancy only suggests to us the imperfection of our present knowledge, and is not allowed to disturb the confidence of the physician in principles already esta- blished on incontrovertible evidence. On the contrary, whilst he modifies his practice from time to time by the experience he has gained by actual ob- servation, he feels at the same time the fullest conviction, that these results will be found eventually reconcileable with the general principles, which a still more extended series of induction may have established. I need not occupy your time by applying the same method of proceeding to the recent researches alluded to, but I will carry the analogy between the science of Agriculture and of Therapeutics one step further. You may recol- lect, that in a Report on the progress of husbandry, drawn up some years ago by one of the most enlightened and zealous promoters of the agricultural interest in Great Britain, now, alas! deceased, it was asserted, that chemistry had done nothing for the farmer, except in teaching him to use sulphuric acid with his bones, and to take advantage of the refuse flax liquor, formerly thrown away and wasted. Now a statement of this kind, although it might be literally true in the narrow sense in which the author doubtless intended it, namely, as referring merely to the introduction of new specifics or recipes into farming, was calculated, when put forth on such high authority, to foster that tendency in the human mind to which we are all more or less prone, that of sparing our- selves the trouble of thought and reflection in shaping the course of our con- duct, by leaning blindly upon certain rigid and unvarying rules already chalked out to us by others. It was this propensity exercised upon moral subjects which has encumbered our libraries with those vast tomes on casuistry, in which the conduct to be pursued in each imaginable case of conscience was attempted to be pre- scribed ; it was this which has driven many a patient to fly from the regular practitioner into the arms of the homceopathist, who professes to have a glo- bule ready to meet every possible symptom. Grant that Science has as yet supplied us with only two infallible receipts for the improvement of our land, the agricultural chemist may derive courage from the reflection, that medicine too, since the days of Hippocrates, has lighted only upon two or three specifics for the cure of disease; and that the most enlightened physicians of the present day, in the spirit which we would fain see actuating the leaders of the agricultural body, depend not upon the efficacy of nostrums, but upon their sagacity in referring the varying condi- tions of each case which comes before them to those principles of physiology which modern Science has established. And has not Science also unfolded principles which may be called in to aid and direct the practical labours of the agriculturist ? I need not go further than the works of Baron Liebig for an answer to this question. I may appeal, for instance, to the extensive employment of guano at the present time, first introduced in England in consequence of his lviii REPORT—1856. suggestions: I may refer to the substitution of mineral phosphates for bones, founded upon his explanation of the sources from which the latter substance derives its efficacy as a manure: and 1 may allude more especially to his refutation of the humus theory, to which even the great Saussure gave his adhesion, and the reception of which was calculated to vitiate, not a few pro- cesses only, but the entire system of our husbandry. But whilst we do justice to those comprehensive views on agricultural science which have shed a new lustre upon the name of Liebig, Jet us not forget the practical researches which have been earried on in our own country ; and especially those conducted under the auspices of the Highland Society by Dr. Anderson; at our own Agricultural College by Prof. Voelcker; and, through the aid of the Royal Agricultural Society, by their consulting chemist, Mr. Way. And, although in alluding to the labours of the latter, we may be bound to confess, that in one of the latest and probably the most important investigations undertaken by him, that namely on the absorptive qualities of clay with reference to ammoniacal salts, he had been anticipated, so far as the principle goes, by the German Professor, who announced the fact many years before in his work ‘ On Chemistry applied to Agriculture*,’ yet experience has often shown that a principle may lie dormant long after it was enunciated, until its truth is rendered palpable to the senses by a series of practical researches expressly directed with a view to demonstrate its general applicability. Baron Liebig has himself remarked, that as a plant, in order to thrive, must receive its food, not in a concentrated form, but reduced to a certain state of tenuity by being diffused through water; so an abstract truth only makes an impression upon the mind and feelings, when presented to it properly diluted, turned, as it were, inside out, examined under every aspect, and decked out with all the accompaniments of dress, ornament, and colour. Then, indeed, as the seed, when implanted in the ground and taken root, is able to cleave asunder the hardest rocks, and that, as the old proverb says, all without noise ; so likewise the truth will at length in its own good time begin to germinate, and gradually conquering all obstacles, establish for itself a footing in the mind of the public. Let us not therefore withhold our meed of approbation from those who have worked out for us any useful scientific principle, even though the germ may be traceable to some other quarter ; conscious that it is to its being brought thus prominently forward, and, as it were, forced upon the attention of the public, that we owe its general reception and its reduction to practice. But it is time to hasten on to certain other departments of Natural Science. In Botany and Vegetable Physiology it cannot perhaps be said, that whole provinces have been added to the domain of the Science since the period alluded to, as we have seen to be the case in our review of the progress of chemistry. Even so long ago as the year 1832, the elder DeCandolle, who, if not the most original or the most profound of the botanists of his day, was at least the most conspicuous for the wide range of his information, and for his happy talent of imparting it to others, published that admirable work on vegetable physiology, which even at the present time is capable of serving as a most useful guide in many branches of the subject. And yet what a mass of important information has been brought together since that period ! * P, 57, Eng. Trans. ADDRESS. lix The improvements in the microscope which have since taken place, render us familiar with particulars relating to the structure and functions of the vegetable creation, which the ruder methods of investigation before resorted to would never have revealed to us. We owe to them the interesting discoveries of Brown and Adolphe Brong- niart, as to the mode in which the pollen is brought into immediate contact with the ovules, by means of the tubes which it protrudes by a prolongation of the innermost of its two investing membranes. Thus much at least appears to be fully ascertained; but in alluding to the observations of others who have endeavoured to push their scrutiny still further, it becomes me to speak with more diffidence, inasmuch as the office which the pollen discharges in the act of fecundation is still a matter of dispute, between such men as Schleiden and Schacht on the one side, and Hofmeister, Moll, &c. on the other. Whilst, however, this controversy continues, it is something at least to know, that the vivifying principle, whatever it may be, is actually transmitted to the part where its influence is to be exerted, and not kept apart from it, as we were formerly compelled to assume, by that long intervening plexus of fibres or tubes which constitutes the style. To the microscope also we owe all that is as yet known with respect to the reproductive process in cryptogamous plants, which are now shown to possess a structure analogous to that of flowering ones in respect to their organs of reproduction ; not, indeed, as Hedwig supposed, that parts corresponding to stamens and pistils in appearance and structure can be discovered in them, but that, as the primary distinction of sexes seems to run throughout the vegetable kingdom, new parts are superadded to a structure common to all as we ascend in the scale of creation, until from the simple cell, which, in consequence of some differences of structure to our eyes inappreciable, ap- pears to exercise in one case the function of the male, in another of the female, as is found the case in certain of the Conferve, we arrive at length at the com- plicated machinery exhibited in flowering plants, in which the cell containing the fecundating principle is first matured in the stamen, and afterwards trans- mitted through an elaborate apparatus to the cells of the ovule, which is in like manner enveloped in its matrix, and protected by the series of investing membranes which constitutes the seed-vessel. Thus, as Goethe long ago observed, and as modern Physiologists have since shown to be the case, the more imperfect a being is, the more its individual parts resemble each other —the progress of development, both in the animal and vegetable kingdom, always proceeding from the like to the unlike, from the general to the particular. _ But whilst the researches of Brown and others have proved, that there is no abrupt line of division in the vegetable kingdom, and that one common struc- ture pervades the whole; the later inquiries of Suminski, Hofmeister, Unger, Griffith, and Henfrey, have pointed out several curious and unlooked-for analogies between plants and animals. . I may mention, in the first place, as an instance of this analogy, the ex- _istence of moving molecules or phytosperms in the antheridia of Ferns and : other Cryptogams, borne out, as it has been in so remarkable a manner, by the almost simultaneous observations of Bischoff and Meissner on the egg, confirmatory of those formerly announced by Barry and Newport; and by the researches of Suminski, Thuret, and Pringsheim, with respect to the ovule of plants. I may refer you also to a paper read at the last Meeting of the Association, by Dr. Colin of Breslau, who, in bringing this subject before _ the Natural History Section, adduced instances of a distinction of sexes which had come under his observation in the lower Alge. Ix. REPORT—1856. In like manner a curious correspondence has been traced between the lower tribes of animals and plants, in the circumstance of both being subject to the law of what is called alternate generation. This consists in a sort of cycle of changes from one kind of being to another, which was first detected in some of the lower tribes of animals, a pair of insects, for example, producing a progeny differing from themselves in outward appearance and internal structure, and these reproducing their kind without any renewed sexual union, the progeny in these cases consisting of females only. At length, after a succession of such generations, the offspring reverts to its primeval type, and pairs of male and female insects of the original form are reproduced, which complete the cycle, by giving rise in their turn to a breed presenting the same characters as those which belong to their own progenitors. An ingenious comparison had been instituted by Owen and others between this alternation of generations in the animal, and the alternate production of leaves and blossoms in the plant; but the researches to which I especially allude have rendered this no longer a matter of mere speculation or inference, inasmuch as they have shown the same thing to occur in Ferns, in Lyco- podia, in Mosses, nay, even in the Confervee. We are indebted to Professor Henfrey for a valuable contribution to our Transactions in 1851 on these subjects, given in the form of a Report on the Higher Cryptogamous Plants; from which it at least appears, that the proofs of sexuality in the Cryptogamia rank in the same scale as to com- pleteness, as those regarding flowering plants did before the access of the pollen tubes to the ovule had been demonstrated. Indeed, if the observations of Pringsheim with respect to certain of the Algz are to be relied upon, the analogy between the reproductive process in plants and animals is even more clearly made out in these lower tribes, than it is in those of higher organization. It also appears, that the production in Ferns and other Acrogens of what has been called a pro-embryo; the evolution of antheridia and arche- gonia, or of male and female organs, from the former; and the generation from the archegonia of a frond bearing spores upon its under surface, is analogous to what takes place in flowering plants in general; where the seed, when it germinates, produces stem, roots and leaves ; the stem for many gene- rations gives rise to nothing but shoots like itself; until at length a flower springs from it, which contains within itself for the most part the organs of both sexes united, and therefore occasions the reproduction of the same seed with which the chain of phenomena commenced. This is the principle which a learned Professor at Berlin has rather obscurely shadowed out in his Treatise on the Rejuvenescence of Plants, and which may perhaps be re- garded as one at least of the means, by which Nature provides for the stabi- lity of the forms of organic life she has created, by imparting to each plant a tendency to revert to the primeval type. To the elder DeCandolle we are also indebted for some of our most philo- sophical views with respect to the laws which regulate the distribution of plants over the globe,—views which have been developed and extended, but by no means subverted, by the investigations of subsequent writers ; amongst whom Sir Charles Lyell, in his ‘ Principles of Geology,’ and the younger DeCandolle, a worthy inheritor of his father’s reputation, in his recently published work on Botanical Geography, have especially signalized them- selves. But it is to the late Professor Edward Forbes, and to Dr. Joseph Hooker, that we have principally to attribute the removal of those anomalies, which threw a certain degree of doubt upon the principles laid down by ————— eS ell ed ADDRESS. ‘lxi DeCandolle in 1820, in his celebrated article on the Geography of Plants, contained in the ‘ Dictionnaire des Sciences Naturelles,’-where the derivation of each species from an individual, or a pair of individuals, created in one particular locality, was made the starting-point of all our inquiries. These anomalies were of two different kinds, and pointed in two opposite directions: for we had in some cases to explain the occurrence of a peculiar flora in islands cut off from the rest of the world, except through the medium of a wide intervening ocean; and in other cases to reconcile the fact of the same or of allied species being diffused over vast areas, the several portions of which are at the present time separated from each other in such a manner, as to prevent the possibility of the migration of plants from one to the other. Indeed, after making due allowances for those curious contrivances by which Nature has in many instances provided for the transmission of species over different parts of the same continent, and even across the ocean, and which are so well pointed out in DeCandolle’s original essay, we are com- pelled to admit the apparent inefficiency of existing causes to account for the distribution of the larger number of species; and must confess that the explanation fails us often where it is most needed; for the Composite, in spite of those feathery appendages they possess, which are so favourable to the wide dissemination of their seeds, might be inferred, by their general absence from the fossil flora, to have diffused themselves in a less degree than many other families have done. And on the other hand, it is found, that under existing circumstances, those Composite, which are disseminated throughout the area of the Great Pacific, belong in many cases to species destitute of these auxiliaries to transmission. But here Geology comes to our aid; for by pointing out the probability of the submergence of continents on the one hand, and the elevation of tracts of land on the other, it enables us to explain, the occurrence of the same plants in some islands or continents now wholly unconnected, and the exist- ence of a distinct flora in others too isolated to obtain it under present cir- cumstances from without. In the one case we may suppose the plants to have been distributed over the whole area before its several parts became disunited by the catastrophes which supervened; in the other, we may re- gard the peculiar flora now existing as merely the wreck, as it were, of one which once overspread a large tract of land, of which all but the little patch upon which it is now found had since been submerged. Upon this subject, however, our opinions may in some measure be swayed by the nature of the conclusions we arrive at with respect to the length of time during which seeds are capable of maintaining their vitality ; for if after remaining for an indefinite period in the earth they were capable of germi- nating, it would doubtless be easier to understand the revival, under favour- able circumstances, of plants which had existed before the severance of a tract of land from the continent in which they are indigenous. An inquiry has accordingly been carried on for the last fifteen years under the auspices of, and with the aid of funds supplied by, this Association, the results of which, it is but fair to say, by no means corroborate the reports that had been from time to time given us with respect to the extreme longevity of certain seeds, exemplified, as it was said, in the case of the mummy-wheat and other somewhat dubious instances; inasmuch as they tend to show, that none of the seeds which were tested, although they had been placed under the most favourable artificial conditions that could be devised, vegetated beyond a period of forty-nine years; that only twenty out of 288 species did so after twenty years; whilst by far the larger number had lost their germinating power in the course of ten. . lxii REPORT—1856, These results, indeed, being merely negative, ought not to outweigh such positive statements on the contrary side as come before us recommended by respectable authority, such, for instance, as that respecting a Nelumbium seed, which germinated after having been preserved in Sir Hans Sloane’s Herbarium for 150 years; still, however, they throw suspicion as to the existence in seeds of that capacity of preserving their vitality almost indefi- nitely, which alone would warrant us in calling to our aid this principle in explaining the wide geographical range which certain species of plants affect. Let us then be content to appeal to those ingenious views which were first put forth at one of our meetings by the late Professor Forbes, and which have since been promulgated in a more detailed and systematic form by the same distinguished naturalist. By the aid of the principles therein laid down, he was enabled to trace the flora of Great Britain principally to four distinct sources, owing to the geological connexion of these islands at one period or other with Scandinavia, with Germany, with France, and with Spain! And it was by a similar assumption that Dr. Joseph Hooker explained the dis- tribution of the same species throughout the islands of the Great Pacific, and the contiguous continents, tracts which, as Darwin had shown, were formerly united. Nor is this mode of explanation limited to the case of the above regions ; for in the ‘ Flora Indica,’ which important work I regret to find has been suspended after the appearance of the first volume, Dr. Hooker, in conjunction with his fellow traveller, Dr. Thomson, has diseussed the same problem with regard to the whole of India, extending from Affghanistan to the Malayan peninsula. And amongst the many services rendered to the Natural Sciences by these indefatigable botanists, one of the greatest I conceive to be, that they have not only protested against that undue multiplication of species, which had taken place by exalting minute points of difference into grounds of radical and primary distinction, but that they have also practically illustrated their views with respect to the natural families which have been described by them in the volume alluded to. They have thus contributed materially to remove another difficulty which stood in the way of the adoption of the theory of specific centres,—I mean the replacement of forms of vegetation in adjoining countries by others, not identical, but only as it should seem allied ; for it follows from the principles laid down by these authors, that such ap- parently distinct species may after all have been only varieties, produced by the operation of external causes acting upon the same species during long periods of time. But if this be allowed, what limits, it may be asked, are we to assign to the changes which a plant is capable of undergoing, and in what way can we oppose the principle of the transmutation of species, which has of late ex- cited so much attention, and the admission of which is considered to involve such startling consequences ? I must refer you to the writings of modern physiologists for a full discus- sion of this question, and may appeal in particular to the lecture delivered before this Association by Dr. Carpenter at our last meeting. All that [ shall venture to remark on the subject is, that had not Nature herself assigned certain boundaries to the changes which plants are capable of undergoing, there would seem no reason why any species at all should be restricted within a definite area, since the unlimited power of adaptation to external conditions which it would then possess might enable it to diffuse itself throughout the world, as easily as it has done over that portion of space within which it is actually circumscribed. ADDRESS. — lsiii ‘Dr. Hooker instances certain species of Coprosma, of Celmisia, and a kind of Australian Fern, the Lomaria procera, which have undergone such striking ‘changes in their passage from one portion of the Great Pacific to another, that they are scarcely recognizable as the same, and have actually been re- ‘garded by preceding botanists as distinct species. But he does not state that any of these plants have ever been seen beyond the above-mentioned precinets; and yet if Nature had not imposed some limits to their suscepti- bility of change, one does not see why they might not have spread over a much larger portion of the earth, in a form more or less modified by external ‘circumstances. The younger DeCandolle, in his late admirable treatise already referred to, has enumerated about 117 species of plants which have been thus dif- fused over at least a third of the surface of the globe; but these apparently owed their power of transmigration to their insusceptibility of change, for it does not appear that they have been much modified by the effect of climate or locality, notwithstanding the extreme difference in the external conditions to which they were subjected. On the other hand, it seems to be a general law, that plants, whose organi- zation is more easily affected by external agencies, become, from that very cause, more circumscribed in their range of distribution ; simply because a greater difference in the circumstances under which they would be placed brought with it an amount of change in their structure, which exceeded the limits prescribed to it by Nature. In short, without pretending to do more than to divine the character of those impediments, which appear ever to prevent the changes of which a plant is susceptible from proceeding beyond a certain limit, we seem to catch a glimpse of a general law of Nature, not limited to one of her kingdoms, but extending everywhere throughout her jurisdiction,—a law, the aim of which may be inferred to be, that of maintaining the existing order of the universe, without any material or permanent alteration, throughout all time, until the fiat of Omnipotence has gone forth for its destruction. The will, which confines the variations in the vegetable structure within a certain range, lest the order of creation should be disturbed by the introduc- tion of an indefinite number of intermediate forms, is apparently the same in its motive, as that which brings back the celestial Luminaries to their ori- ginal orbits, after the completion of a cycle of changes induced by their mutual perturbations; it is the same which says to the Ocean, Thus far shalt thou go, and no further; and to the Winds, Your violence, however _ apparently capricious and abnormal, shall nevertheless be constrained within ee certain prescribed limits— Ni faciat, maria et terras coelumque profundum, Quippe ferant rapidi secum, verrantque per auras. The whole indeed resolves itself into, or at least is intimately connected with, that law of symmetry to which Nature seems ever striving to confirm, and which possesses the same significance in the organic world, which the law of definite proportions does in the inorganic. It is the principle which the prophetic genius of Goethe had divined, long before it had been proved by the labours of physiologists to be a reality, and to which the poet attached such importance, that the celebrated discussion -as to its merits which took place in 1820 between Cuvier and Geoffroy St. Hilaire so engrossed his mind, as to deprive him, as his biographer informs us*, of all interest in one of the mostportentous politicalevents of modern days * Lewes’ Life of Goethe, vol. ii. Ixiv ; REPORT—1856. which was enacting at the very same epoch,—I mean the subversion of the Bourbon dynasty. It is indeed not less calculated to subserve to the gratification of our sense of the beautiful, than to provide against too wide a departure from that order of creation which its great Author has from the beginning in- stituted; and, as two learned Professors of a sister kingdom have pointed out in memoirs laid before this Association, and have since embodied in a distinct treatise*, manifests itself not less in the geometrical adjustment of the branches of a plant, and of the scales of a fir-apple—nay even, as they have wished to prove, in the correspondence between the form of the fruit and that of the tree on which it grows—than in the frequent juxtaposition of the complementary rays of the spectrum, by which that harmony of colour is produced in Nature, which we are always striving, however unsuccessfully, to imitate in Art. The law, indeed, seems to be nothing else than a direct consequence of that unity of design pervading the universe, which so bespeaks a common Creator— of the existence in the mind of the Deity of a sort of archetype, to which His various works have all to a certain extent been accommodated ; so that the earlier forms of life may be regarded as types of those of later creation, and the more complex ones but as developments of rudimentary parts existing in the more simple. Here too we may perhaps trace an analogy with His dealings with mankind, as unfolded in His Revealed Word ; from which we find, that the earlier events recorded are often typical of those more modern, and that Christianity itself is in some sense a development of the Jewish dispensation which preceded it. I should apologize for dwelling so long upon the two departments of natu- ral knowledge to which I have hitherto confined myself, were it not that other sciences of a still higher rank than those treated of had been discussed so fully in the Discourses of former Presidents. Whilst indeed this is the first occasion, save one, in which a Chemist has had the honour of occupying the Chair of the British Association, it has on no former occasion fallen to the lot of a professed Botanist to be thus distin- guished. I have therefore consulted alike my own ease, and what was due to the Sciences themselves, in making Chemistry and Botany the principal themes of my discourse. Leaving, then, to the gifted friend who will discourse before you next Monday evening “On the Correlation of Physical Forces,” the task of connecting with those Powers of Nature that manifest themselves in the phenomena of chemical attraction or of cell-development, the im- ponderable agents which form the proper subjects of branches of Physics not here dwelt upon, and thus establishing the existence of that common brother- hood among the Sciences, which furnishes the best plea for such Meetings as the present, I will only further detain you by noticing one other field of inquiry, in which I have ever felt a lively interest, although it has only been in my power to bestow on it a casual attention, or to cultivate one limited portion of the wide range which it embraces. Indeed Geology, the Science to which I now allude, has, during the last twenty years, made such rapid strides, that those who endeavoured from an early period of life to follow at a humble distance the footsteps of the great leaders in that Science, obeying the impulse of such zealous and ardent spirits, as the one—now, alas! by the inscrutable decrees of Providence, lost to his friends and to Science,—who constituted the Head of what was once * Typical Forms, by M‘Cosh and Dickie. ADDRESS. Ixv called, I hope not too grandiloquently, the Oxford School of Geology, —have, if I may judge of others by myself, been often distanced in the race, and when they endeavoured to make good their lost ground, found themselves transported into a new, and to them an almost unknown region. Thus the thorough exploration which has taken place of the Silurian and Cambrian systems, through the exertions of two of our oldest and most valued Associates, has added a new province—ought I not rather to say, a new kingdom ?—to the domain of Geology, and has earried back the records of the creation to a period previously as much unknown to us as were the annals of the Assyrian dynasties before the discoveries of Sir Henry Rawlinson. I might also be disposed to claim for the recent investigations of Botanists some share in fixing the relative antiquity of particular portions of the globe, for, from the floras they have given us of different islands in the Great Pacific, it would appear, that the families of plants which characterize some groups are of a more complicated organization than those of another. Thus whilst Otaheite chiefly contains Orchids, Apocynez, Asclepiadez and Urticez ; the Sandwich, Islands possess Lobeliaceze and Goodenovie; and the Galapagos Islands, New Zealand and Juan Fernandez, Composite, the highest form perhaps of dicotyledonous plants. In deducing this consequence, however, 1 am proceeding upon a principle which has lately met with opposition, although it was formerly regarded as one of the axioms in geology. Amongst these, indeed, there was none whieh a few years ago seemed so little likely to be disputed, as that the classes of animals and vegetables which possessed the most complicated structure were preceded by others of a more simple one; and that when we traced back the succession of beings to the lowest and the earliest of the sedimentary formations, we arrived at length at a class of rocks, the deposition of which must be inferred, from the almost entire absence of organic remains, to have followed very soon after the first dawn of creation. But the recognition of the footsteps and remains of reptiles in beds of an earlier date than was before assigned to them, tended to corroborate the inferences which had been previously deduced from the discovery, in a few rare instances, in rocks of the secondary age, of mammalian remains ; and thus has induced certain eminent geologists boldly to dispute, whether from the earliest to the latest period of the earth’s history any gradation of beings can in reality be detected. Into this controversy I shall only enter at present, so far as to point out an easy method of determining the fact, that organic’ remains never can have existed in a particular rock, even although it may have been subjected to such metamorphic action as would have obliterated all traces of their pre- sence. This is simply to ascertain, that the material in question is utterly destitute of phosphoric acid; for inasmuch as every form of life appears to be essentially associated with this principle, and as no amount of heat would be sufficient to dissipate it when in a state of combination, whatever quantity of phosphoric acid had in this manner been introduced into the rock, must have continued there till the end of time, notwithstanding any igneous ope- rations which the materials might have afterwards undergone. But as the discovery of very minute traces of phosphoric acid, when mixed with the other ingredients of a rock, is a problem of no small difficulty, an indireet method of ascertaining its presence suggested itself to me in some experi- ments of the kind which I have instituted, namely, that of sowing some kind -of seed, such for instance as barley, in a sample of the pulverized rock, and determining whether the crop obtained yielded more phosphoric acid than 1856. e Ixvi REPORT—1856. was present in the grain, it being evident that any excess must have been derived from the rock from which it drew its nourishment. Should it appear by an extensive induction of particulars, that none of the rocks lying at the base of the Silurian formation, which have come before us, contain more phosphoric acid than the minute quantity I detected in the slates of Bangor and Llanberris, which were tested in the above manner, it might perhaps be warrantable hereafter to infer, that we had really touched upon those formations that had been deposited at a time when organic beings were only just beginning to start into existence, and to which, therefore, the term Azoic, assigned to these rocks by some of the most eminent of our geo- logists, might not be inappropriate. The proofs of the former extension of glaciers in the northern hemisphere, far beyond their actual limits, tend also to complicate the question which has at all times so much engaged the attention of cosmogonists with respect to the ancient temperature of the earth’s surface ; compelling us to admit, that at least during the later of its epochs, oscillations of heat and cold must have occurred, to interfere with the progress of refrigeration which was taking place in the crust. On the other hand, facts of an opposite tendency, such as the discovery announced at our last Meeting by Captain Belcher, of the skeleton of an Ichthyosaurus in lat. 77°, have been multiplying upon us within the same period; inasmuch as they appear to imply, that a much higher temperature. in former times pervaded the Arctic regions than can be referred to local causes, and therefore force upon us the admission, that the internal heat of the nucleus of our globe must at one time have influenced in a more marked manner than at present the temperature of its crust. On the causes of this increased temperature, whether local or cosmical, much elaborate research has been brought to bear, by Sir Charles Lyell in his celebrated ‘ Principles of Geology,’ and by Mr. Hopkins in his Address to the Geological Society. The most extensive collection of facts, however, having reference to this subject, is contained in the Reports on Earthquake Phznomena, published by Mr. Mallet in our Transactions, supplying, as they do, data of the highest importance to the full elucidation of the subject. For although the evidence I have myself brought together in my work on Volcanos might be sufficient to establish in a general way the connexion of earthquakes with that deep- seated cause which gives rise to the eruptions of a volcano, yet our interest is thereby only the more awakened in the phenomena they present,—just as Dr. Whewell’s inquiries into the local variations of the Tides were valued all the more in consequence of the persuasion already felt, that lunar attraction was their principal cause. But if earthquakes bring under our notice chiefly the dynamical effects of this hidden cause of movement and of change, those of volcanos serve to reveal to us more especially their chemical ones; and it is only by com- bining the information obtained from these two sources, together with those from hot springs, especially as regards the gaseous products of each, that we can ever hope to penetrate the veil which shrouds the operations of this mysterious agent; so as to pronounce, with any confidence, whether the effects we witness are due, simply to that incandescent state in which our planet was first launched into space, or to the exertion of those elective at- tractions which operate between its component elements,—attractions which might be supposed to have given rise, in the first instance, to a more ener- getic action and consequently to a greater evolution of heat, than is taking Eee ADDRESS. lxvii place at present, when their mutual affinities are in a greater measure assuaged. Within the last twenty years much has been done towards the elucidation of this problem, through the united investigations of Boussingault, of Deville, and above all of Bunsen, with respect to the gases and other bodies evolved from volcanos in their various phases of activity; the results of which, how- ever, do not appear to me to present anything irreconcileable with that view of their causes which was put forth many years ago in the work I published. Whilst, however, the latter is offered as nothing more than as a conjectural explanation of the phenomena in question, I may remind those, who prefer the contrary hypothesis on the ground that the oblate figure of the earth is in itself a sufficient proof of its primzeval fluidity, that this condition of things could only have been brought about in such materials by heat of an intensity, sufficient, whilst it lasted, to annul all those combinations amongst the elements which chemical affinity would have a tendency to induce, and thus to render those actions. to which I have ascribed the phenomena, not only eonceivable, but even necessary consequences, of the cooling down of our planet from its original melted condition. In the nearly allied Science of Geography, several important undertakings have been set on foot, and some interesting discoveries made since the period of our last Meeting. 1. Dr. Kane has extended Arctic discovery, through Smith Strait, at the head of Baffin Bay, to about 3 degrees nearer the Pole. 2. Mr. Kelley has announced the result of several independent surveying expeditions despatched by him to the Valley of the Atrato, with a view to the formation of a great navigable channel through Central America, between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. When Humboldt directed attention to this region fifty years since, he had only uncertain reports to guide his anticipations ; and these surveys have been the first to throw actual light upon this region. 3. An expedition has been despatched to North Australia, for the purpose of exploring the interior and tracing the extent of the northern watershed. Its arrival at the mouth of the Victoria River has already been announced. 4. It is proposed, by the Geographical Society, to despatch an expedition to Eastern Africa, to explore the extent of the inland waters known to exist _ there, and if possible to discover the long-sought sources of the Nile. 5. Explorations have been undertaken in the Rocky Mountains, by several parties in South America, in the Pacific, and elsewhere: these, however, are far too numerous to be particularly alluded to. Such are a few of the additions to our knowledge which have been made “in the course of the last twenty years in those sciences with which I am most familiar. ; Whilst, however, the actual progress whieh has taken place in them is in itself so satisfactory, the change which the sentiments of the public have undergone, with respect to their claims to respect, affords no less room for congratulation. If our attention is turned to the metropolis, we see rising up around us establishments for the advancement of Physical Science, of which our ances- tors would scarcely have dreamed the possibility. I may instance the School of Mines, first placed under the management of our late Associate, Sir Henry De la Beche, and now presided over by Sir Roderick Murchison, as a convincing proof of the improved feeling ou such subjects entertained by the Government of this country. e2 lxvili REPORT—1856. I may mention also another proof of a greater appreciation of the claims of Science, in their having departed from the practice which had prevailed ever since the death of Sir Isaac Newton, of regarding the Mastership of Her Majesty’s Mint a purely political appointment, and in conferring it, as they have done on the two last occasions, as a reward for scientific eminence. ; [t is also gratifying to find, that the attention of the Legislature has at length been seriously called to consider what measures of a public nature might be adopted for improving the position of Science and its cultivators, and that the Royal Society has appointed a Body of its Members to receive suggestions on that subject, and to report upon it, in order that a matured plan may be presented to Parliament to meet this object at its next Session. Nor, if we extend our glance to the Provinces, need I go further than the neighbourhood of our present place of meeting, in order to point out as many as four active clubs of naturalists, who sustain as well as diffuse an interest in our pursuits, by frequent meetings, and by investigating, in com- mon, the physical peculiarities of their respective neighbourhoods. In this very county, too, we have lately witnessed the first example of an Institution founded for the express purpose of communicating to the rising generation of farmers, that scientific as well as practical instruction, the union of which is admitted by every enlightened agriculturist to be essential, for the purpose of deriving the fullest advantage from the natural resources of our soil. Nor can I help feeling an honest pride when I reflect, that this Esta- blishment, which has since risen to such imporiance, and is celebrated throughout the land as the best training school for youths destined to hus- bandry which England affords, should have emanated from the members of a little club existing in a neighbouring county-town, endeared to me by long associations, from its near proximity to the place of my birth, and the home of my earliest years. Turning, too, to the University to which I belong, in which a few years ago our pursuits were hardly regarded as integral parts of academical instruction, we now find in it at least a recognition of their importance to have taken place, and Classical Literature no longer disdaining to own as her Sisters, the Studies which engross so large a part of the attention of the public in general. Nay, the Academic Body has lately devoted no small portion of its revenues towards the erection of a Museum, intended to comprehend under one roof all the appliances for research, as well as all the means of instruction which can be required in the several branches of Natural Philosophy. The extension, indeed, which is now given to the name in the language of naturalists, and even by the public at large, is in itself an indication of correcter views than were formerly entertained with regard to the uses of such Establishments. Few, for instance, have such a notion of a Museum as Horace Walpole eave utterance to at the close of the last century*, when he defined it “a “hospital for everything that is singular—whether the thing has acquired “ singularity from baving escaped the rage of time—from any natural oddness, «__or from being so insignificant that nobedy thought it worth while to pro- “ duce any more of the same.” Nor will it be possible to ridicule these Institutions, as an eminent member of my own University, even within my recollection, was tempted to do, in alluding to the little Institutions of the kind set up in some of our pro- vincial towns f. ‘ The stuffed ducks, the skeleton in the mahogany case, the starved cat and * Fugitive Pieces. + Sewell’s Letter to a Dissenter, 1834. : . : a aA. ADDRESS. Ixxi “rat which were found behind a wainscot, the broken potsherd from an old “ barrow, the tattooed head of the New Zealand chief, the very unpleasant- * looking lizards and snakes coiled up in the spirits of wine, the flint-stones “and cockle shells,” &c., will no longer be seen jumbled together in hetero- _ geneous confusion, as might have been the case at the period alluded to. The Ipswich Museum has set an example, which I have no doubt will be generally followed, of selecting for such Institutions a series of types illus- trative of the mineral, vegetable, and animal kingdoms; and a Committee of this Association is now employed in the useful undertaking of preparing a list of objects calculated to illustrate the different forms in nature, and thus rendering our provincial Museums no longer mere rareeshows, but places where the masses may receive instruction in all branches of Natural History. But the Oxford Museum aims at much more than is usually understood by that title. Its central area, indeed, may be regarded as the Sanctuary of the Temple of Science, intended to include all those wonderful contrivances by which the Author of the Universe manifests himself to His creatures; whilst the apartments which surround it, dedicated as they will be to lectures and researches connected with all branches of Physical Science, may repre- sent the chambers of the ministering Priests, engaged in worshiping at her altar, and in expounding her mysteries. In turning too to this Association, the reception with which it is now greeted in the course of its migrations through the various portions of the United Kingdom, is not less encouraging as an augury of the future pro- spects of Science. Our Body, irdeed, may now be said to have passed unscathed through that ordeal to which all infant undertakings are exposed, and which even its great prototype, the Royal Society of London, at its commencement, did not altogether escape. And the best proof that such is the case, will be found in the different manner in which it is received by the public in general. Twenty years ago the invitations sent us proceeded, either from places like the Universities expressly dedicated to learning, and: therefore peculiarly called upon to lend a helping hand to Science ; or else from Cities, in which the predominant occupations brought the mass of the population into im- mediate and constant connexion with scientific processes. Now, on the contrary, we have seen the two principal Certres of fashion- able resort—the favourite retreats of the wealthy and noble of the land— vieing with each other in their eagerness to receive us; and an almost purely agricultural County greeting us with the same hearty welcome as that which we had heretofore received from the commercial and manufacturing Communities. Twenty years ago it was thought necessary to explain at our meetings the character and objects of this Association, and to vindicate it from the denun- ciations fulminated against it by individuals, and even by parties of men, who held it up as dangerous to religion, and subversive of sound principles in theology. Now, so marked is the change in public feeling, that we are solicited by the clergy, no less than by the laity, to hold our meetings within their pre- cinets ; and have never received a heartier welcome than in the city in which we are now assembled, which values itself so especially, and with such good ~ reason, on the extent and excellence of its educational establishments. It begins, indeed, to be generally felt, that amongst the faculties of mind, upon the development of which in youth success in after life mainly depends, there are some which are best improved through the cultivation of the Physical Sciences, and that the rudiments of those Sciences are most easily acquired at an early period of life. eee a ee ay i. ]xx REPORT—1856. That power of minute observation—those habits of method and arrange- ment—that aptitude for patient and laborious inquiry—that tact and sagacity in deducing inferences from evidence short of demonstiation, which the Natural Sciences more particularly promote, are the fruits of early education, and acquired with difficulty at a later period. It is during childhood, also, that the memory is most fresh and retentive ; and that the nomenclature of the sciences, which, from its erabbedness and technicality, often repels us at a more advanced age, is acquired almost without an effort. Although, therefore, it can hardly be expected, that the great schools in the country will assign to the Natural Sciences any important place in their systems of instruction, until the Universities for which they are the seminaries set them the example, yet 1 cannot doubt, but that the signal once given, both masters and scholars will eagerly embrace a change so congenial to the tastes of youth, and so favourable to the development of their intellectual faculties. And has not, it may be asked, the signal been given by the admission of the Physical Sciences into the curriculum of our academical education ? I trust that this question may be auswered in the affirmative, if we are entitled to assume, that the recognition of them which has already taken place will be consistently followed up, by according to them some such sub- stantial encouragement, as that which has been afforded hitherto almost exclusively to classical literature. Our ability to accomplish this, with the means and appliances at our com- mand, does not, I think, admit of dispute. Happily for this country, the conservative feeling which has ever prevailed amongst us, and the immunity we have enjoyed from such political con- vulsions as have affected most other European nations, maintain in their integrity those Academical Establishments, which, as Monsieur Montalembert has remarked, are, like our Government and our other Institutions, a magni- ficent specimen of the social condition of the middle ages, as it at one time existed throughout the whole of Western Europe. They are Institutions, indeed, which foreigners may well look upon with envy, but which when once destroyed, it is hopeless to expect that Govern- ments, engrossed as they are with the interests and politics of the day, will ever think of restoring. Thanks to their existence, it rarely happens, that a student, in Oxford at least, who has distinguished himself in his classical examinations, fails to obtain some reward for his past exertions, and, if he require it, some assistance to enable him to continue them in future. And this, too, be it observed, has been the case, even whilst the natural, although perhaps mistaken partiality of our founders, for their native counties, . for the parishes in which their estates lay, or for their own collateral descend- ants, greatly curtailed the number of fellowships which could be bestowed on merit. All, therefore, that seems wanted, now that local preferences seem on the point of being removed, is, on the one hand, a more equal distribution of the existing emoluments between the several professions, and, on the other, the admission of the claims of the sciences received into our educational system, to share in the emoluments which, up to this time, have been monopolized by the Classics. And as it is far from my wish to curtail the older studies of the University of their proper share of support—for who that has passed through a course of them can be insensible of the advantages he has derived from that early discipline of the mind which flows from their cultivation ?—I —_ \) ADDRESS. Ixxi rejoice to think, that when the Legislature shall have completed the removal of those restrictions which have hitherto prevented us in many instances from consulting the claims of merit in the distribution of our emolu- ments, there will be ample means afforded for giving all needful encourage- ment to the newly recognized studies, without trenching unduly upon that amount of pecuniary aid which has been hitherto accorded to the Classics. In anticipation of which change, I look forward with confidence to the day, when the requirements at Oxford, in the department of Physical Science, will become so general and so pressing, that no Institution which professes to prepare the youth it instructs for academical competition will venture to risk its reputation by declining to admit these branches of study into its educa- tional courses. Indeed the example has already been set in many, as I understand to be the case with the noble Seminary within whose walls we are now assembled, ‘as well as with that older Establishment, which, under the energetic manage- ment of its present head master, has become its worthy rival as a training school for the Universities. At any rate, I trust the time has now passed away, when studies such as ‘those we recommend lie under the imputation of fostering sentiments inimical to religion. In countries, and in an age in which men of Letters were generally tinc- tured with infidelity, it is not to be supposed that Natural Philosophy would altogether escape the contagion ; but the contemplation of the works of crea- tion is surely in itself far more calculated to induce the humility that paves the way to belief, than the presumption which disdains to lean upon the supernatural. It is not, indeed, without an excusable feeling of exultation that in sur- veying the triumphs of modern science, we see “ An intellectual mastery exercised _ O’er the blind elements ; a purpose given ; A perseverance fed; almost a soul Imparted to brute matter ;” or that we repeat to ourselves the words in which the poet apostrophizes the _ philosopher,— “ Go, wondrous creature! mount where Science guides,— Go, measure earth, weigh air, and state the tides ; Instruct the planets in what orbs to run, Correct old Time, and regulate the Sun.” Nevertheless, if we pursue the line of thought in which the same author indulges, we shall be compelled to ask ourselves, not without a deep sentiment _ of humiliation, even whilst contemplating the highest order of intellect which the human race has ever exhibited,— eit Mallia “ Could he, whose rules the rapid Comet bind, Describe or fix one movement of the mind? Who saw its fires here rise, and there descend, Explain his own beginning, or his end ?” When indeed we reflect within what a narrow area our researches are of necessity circumscribed, when we perceive that we are bounded in space almost to the surface of the planet in which we reside,—itself merely a speck in the universe, one of innumerable worlds invisible from the nearest of the fixed stars—when we recollect, too, that we are limited in point of time to a few short years of life and activity—that our records of the past history of the globe and of its inhabitants are comprised within a minute portion of the xxii REPGRT—1856. latest of the many epochs which the earth has gone through—and that with regard to the future, the most durable monuments we can raise to hand down our names to posterity are liable at any time to be overthrown by an- earthquake, and would be obliterated, as if they had never been, by any of those processes of metamorphic action which geology tells us form a part of the cycle of changes which the globe is destined to undergo,—the more lost in wonder we may beat the vast fecundity of Nature, which within so narrow a sphere can crowd together phenomena so various and so imposing, the more sensible shall we become of the small proportion, which our highest powers and their happiest results bear, not only to the Cause of all causation, but even to other created beings, higher in the scale than ourselves, which we may conceive to exist. “Think thou this world of hopes and fears Could find no statelier than his peers In yonder hundred million spheres?” It is believed, that every one of the molecules which make up the mass of a compound body is an aggregate of a number of atoms, which, by their arrangement and mutual relation, impart to the whole its peculiar properties ; and, according to another speculation which has been already alluded to, these atoms are not absolutely motionless, but are ever shifting their position within certain limits, so as to induce corresponding changes in the properties of the mass. Indeed it has been imagined, that the production of different compounds from the same elements united in the same proportions, may be one of the consequences resulting from the different arrangement of particles thereby induced. If this hypothesis have any foundation in fact, what an example does it set before us of great effects brought about by movements which, to our senses, are too minute to be appreciable: and what an illustration does it afford us of the limited powers inherent in the human race, which are never- theless capable of bringing about effects so varied, and to us so important ; although, as compared with the universe, so insignificant ! We also are atoms, chained down to the little globe in which our lot is cast; allowed asmall field of action, and confined within definite limits, both as to space and as to time. We, too, can only bring about such changes in nature, as are the resultants of those few laws which it lies within the compass of our powers to investigate and to take advantage of. We, too, can only run through a certain round of operations, as limited in their extent, in comparison with those which lie within the bounds of our conception, as the movements of the atoms, which serve to make up a com- pound molecule of any of the substances around us, are to the revolutions of the heavenly Luminaries. And as, according to Professor Owen, the conceivable modifications of the vertebral archetype are very far from being exhausted by any of the forms which now inhabit the earth, or that are known to have existed here at any former period; so likewise the properties of matter with which we are permitted to become cognizant, may form but a small portion of those of which it is susceptible, or with which the Creator may have endowed it in other portions of the Universe. We are told, that in a future and a higher state of existence, the chiéf occupation of the blessed is that of praising and worshiping the Almighty. But is not the contemplation of the works of the Creator, and the study of the ordinances of the Great Lawgiver of the universe, in itself an act of ADDRESS. Ixxili praise and adoration; and, if so, may not one at least of the sources of happiness which we are promised in a future state of existence, one of the rewards for a single-minded and reverential pursuit after truth in our present state of trial, consist in a development of our faculties, and in the power of comprehending those laws and provisions of Nature with which our finite reason prevents us at present from becoming cognizant ? Such are a few of the reflections which the study of Physical Science, cul- tivated in a right spirit, naturally suggests; and I ask you, whether they are not more calculated to inspire humility than to induce conceit; to render us more deeply conscious how much of the vast field of knowledge must ever lie concealed from our view—how small a portion of the veil of Isis it is given us to lift up—and therefore to dispose us to accept, with a more unhesitating faith, the knowledge vouchsafed from on high, on subjects which our own unassisted reason is incapable of fathoming. “Let us not, therefore,” to use the language of a living prelate, “think scorn of the pleasant land. That land is the field of antient and modern Literature—of Philosophy in almost all its Departments—of the Arts of Reasoning and Persuasion. Every part of it may be cultivated with advan- tage, as the Land of Canaan when bestowed upon God’s peculiar people. They were not commanded to let it lie waste, as incurably polluted by the abominations of its first inhabitants; but to cultivate it and to dwell in it, living in obedience to the Divine laws, and dedicating its choicest fruits to the Lord their God.” 1856. f ? + emer ae : Ise: bafimeat ; eval ° nh, was vf tz eo aN pret age criabaae x pe ioe “wep rile a ecignl pty: Ot, page sia? eens man dave vod spo vee Bivuiiy Yesidbece Mirky,. teh), Tal a 4 sa. 5 i aot a7eievran Dita man dS ba ad an: Gy A Br ih pad git bhrg i sl} STAR 3 oath hee otedan es te Doane! Kew 10g noo iy a. ry Rev Loan BM eee in ydi uw? “Iidiswdl om, ap int?” ea suaitn ts Mai tiga ve! Banh 1 Ebel tame obs aoa md. fie recrcurl 10h a rc dittS eke ‘boats _ Saati cosh nc 2 inca YQ'¢ SS ehh die ahd him Sa iy 0 gD ahead weit wade qagcaljy han Wek, Bralis alt ] y Lek gatanet | edt y aha 2 pil i; iG babhoemarira ? re yoy oa Mi thie! ot Louse lletiermleh di ted. \yeinsivt a hes id ma 0 iene ey eesOheutey eat ' qisita ho} bree , sunt sacrit \ + eeperst tate (08 + : Mie Adele af » bye ae ae se | “pees | ao Pf REPORTS ON THE STATE OF SCIENCE. Late es ee os a4 REPORTS ON THE STATE OF SCIENCE. Report from the Committee appointed by the British Association for the Advancement of Science, at the Meeting in Liverpool, in Sep- tember 1854, to investigate and report upon the effects produced upon the Channels of the Mersey by the alterations which within the last fifty years have been made in its Banks. Your Committee have to report, that for the purpose of securing a satis- factory solution of the questions submitted to their investigation, they deemed it expedient to refer different portions of the inquiry to individual members of their body, in the following manner :—~ 1. Mr. George Rennie, to trace historically the important projections into the river, and reclamation of large areas of land which would exclude the entry of water. 2. Mr. Joseph Boult, to show important changes in the bottom, including the channels and outlets of the river, so dividing the work that it may illus- trate the effects of the above-named encroachments. 3. Mr. Henderson, to compare the tides of the present period with the tides registered by Mr. Rendell. It has been thought desirable to present the reports of these gentlemen to the Association unabridged, as affording the best solution of the subject which has yet been prepared, and your Committee will therefore only refer to the more salient points of the inquiry, and to the conclusions to be drawn from the information laid before them. Mr. Rennie’s report is accompanied by copies of the following valuable documents :— 1. Report of Messrs. Wilkin relative to. the navigation and conservancy of the River Mersey, 28th April 1840. 2. Area and content of water in the River Mersey, from Blackrock to Woolston Weir, above Warrington, at certain tides, below and above Liver- pool Old Dock sill, by George Rennie, 18th May 1838. 3. Index of the engineers’ and surveyors’ reports who have reported on the estuary and River Mersey. 4. First and second Memorial of the Mayor, Aldermen and Burgesses of the Borough of Liverpool, April and September 1839. 5. Letter from H. M. Denham, R.N., to the Corporation of Liverpool, 27th September 1836. 6. Statement of the Town-clerk as to the rights of the Mayor, Aldermen, and Burgesses of Liverpool to the lordship of Liverpool, comprising the River Mersey up to the bridges and strand at Liverpool, Toxteth Park, Bir- kenhead, and Wallasey. 1856. B 2 REPORT—1856. 7. Letter from William Lord, R.N., to the Chairman of the Conservancy Committee, 23rd March 1840. 8. Letter from William Lord, R.N., to R. Radcliffe, Esq., 3rd April 1840. The history of the Mersey is well detailed by Messrs. Wilkin down to the date of their inquiry. From their report it appears that until 1818 there was no check or control exercised by any authority over encroachments upon the tidal area of the river. In that year the Corporation of Liverpool, whose jurisdiction extended from Hoylake to Hesketh Bank on the Ribble, and all over the River Mersey to Warrington and Frodsham Bridges, and who had authority to remove any obstructions to the navigation, “ be it the ground or soil of the King’s most excellent Majesty, or any other person or persons, bodies politic or corporate whatsoever,” called in Mr. Whidbey, of Plymouth Break water, to examine the encroachments which had been made onthe estuary at different parts, and to lay down some general principles as to its future preservation. Subsequently Mr. Rennie, Sen., and Messrs. Chapman, Giles, Walker, Mylne, Stevenson, and George and vohn Rennie, reported in con- firmation of the general principles laid down by Mr. Whidbey. They may be briefly stated as follows :—“ That tide harbours are deep or otherwise in proportion to the quantity of water which flows and ebbs through their channels, and that to embank portions of the tidal area is to diminish that quantity of water and consequently to injure the harbour.” So completely had these principles been contravened in former days, that it appears from Mr. Rennie’s calculation of the area and content of water in the River Mersey (No. 2), that the origiial tidal area was 36,500 acres, of which 13,440 acres were then (1838) lost to the tideway, being enclosed marshes. The very elaborate survey of the Mersey, from the Blackrock to Woolston Weir, which was prepared about thirty years since by the late Mr. Giles, C.E., for the Corporation of Liverpool, is an invaluable and unique docu- ment. As it is plotted to an adequate scale, and furnishes data for determining the extent of any changes, either in the area or depth of the river, since that date. As, howéver, the survey has not yet been repeated, your Committee have been unable to investigate the changes in that part of the Mersey: there is reason to believe that some of them have important relations to the well-being of the river, and the great interests in either shore. Amongst others, the mutations in the Devil and Pluckington Banks, and the waste of various portions of the shore are the most remarkable. Unfortunately, Mr. Giles’s survey did not include the outer estuary or. Liverpool Bay ; of this frequent and excellent surveys have been made during the last twenty-three years by Capt. Denham, and his successor Lieut. Lord, who, as marine surveyors to the port, exercised unceasing vigilance on the changes within the sphere of their observations. Mr. Boult’s attention has been especially directed to the alterations recorded by these surveys, and to the influence which may have been exercised upon those alterations by the dock-works of Liverpool and Birkenhead, and by meteorological phe-. nomena. The changes in the areas and positions of the several banks have been laid down in coloured outlines, upon the accompanying charts* A, B, and C, and the alterations in their cubieal contents and in the average areas of the sea channels, as far as they can be approximately ascertained from the surveys, are recorded in the tables D, E, F, and G. From these it appears that there has been a progressive, though irregular, ~ * Of these charts it has been found desirable to publish Chart A. only; as the scale to which the illustrations are necessarily restricted is too small to permit distinetness in the. several contours. THE RIVER MERSEY. 8 increase in the sizes of the banks, the growth having been both lateral and vertical; some of the fluctuations are very remarkable; that the average area of the northern channel remains very stationary, though in places the mutations have been considerable ; and that there has been a diminution of average area in the Rock Channel, arising from a deposit of silt at the eastern end. This channel is the oldest known entrance into the Mersey ; it is laid down by Captain Collins in his survey of 1689, who says of the northern channel (by way of Crosby and Formby) that it is not buoyed or beaconed, and so not known. ‘There appear to be grounds for serious ap- prehensions that the Rock Channel may be irrecoverably lost, if due pre- cautions are not adopted in good time. There have been extraordinary fluctuations in the seaward entrance of the ‘northern channel within the period embraced in this inquiry, and at this present time another great change is being accomplished, namely, the sub- stitution of the Queen's Channel for the Victoria Channel, intermediate between the latter and the Zebra Channel. There is reason to believe that the growth of the banks and the silting up of part of the Rock Channel have been much promoted by the abstraction of area which has taken place for dock purposes; nor is this surprising when we find the extent of this abstraction, and the important part of the river, especially in relation to the Rock Channel, where it has been made. Between 1846 and 1852, or in six years, it seems that as much as 500 acres have been enclosed for the dock-works of Liverpoel and Birkenhead, and the result apparently confirms the correctness of the principle laid down by Mr. Whidbey and other eminent engineers who have reported upon the river, as indicating the consequence of diminishing the scouring power of the last of the flood and the first of the ebb, the situations of the abstractions referred to being in parts of the river which are occupied by those portions of the tidal waters. It appears from Mr. Boult’s researches, that the change of direction in the channels is not so much the result of the direction of the dock walls as of alterations in the size and position of the sand-banks ; alterations which seem to be due to the permanent loss of scouring power, by abstraction of tidal area; to the temporary increase of that loss from drought; to the temporary accession of scouring power from freshes; and to the drifts of sand by the . winds to which the bay is peculiarly exposed, and which are the prevailing winds on this part of the coast. The extent of this sand-drift is so great, that, sinee Collins’s survey, the eastern shore of the estuary appears to have advanced westward as much as one-half the width of the northern channel, or about 1000 yards. It is possible that the deterioration of the Rock Channel is to be ascribed, in part, to the erection of the new north wall at Liverpool. It is built on the Bootle shore, almost immediately opposite the junction of that channel with the northern channel, and directly across the direction of the tidal ‘stream in the Rock Channel. Therefore, the flood-stream entering the river by that channel is suddenly checked by this upright wall, and is deprived of the space formerly allowed by the sloping Bootle shore for gradually changing its direction into that of the main course of the river and the northern channel. It was observed by Messrs. Whidbey, Chapman, and Rennie, in their Report to the Corporation of Liverpool in 1822, that “all channels through which water flows must be of a magnitude proportionate to the quantity which passes them, and any increase or diminution of that quantity will BQ 4 _ REPORT—1856. enlarge or diminish the channel, unless when formed of materials so hard that the strength of the current is not able to remove them.” The truth of this observation is strikingly confirmed by the remarkable waste of the clay cliffs of the Cheshire shore of the river at Seacombe and Egremont. This has been observed for many years past; but, according to the evidence which accompanies the report of Mr. Walker, C.E., printed by order of the House of Commons, 23rd June 1856, it has greatly increased within the last ten years, or since so much of the tideway on the opposite shore has been abstracted for the north dock-works. The result of the inquiry, so far as your Committee have been able to prosecute it, shows the vital importance of a strict conservancy of the River Mersey in all its tidal area, in order that it may be preserved for the vast commerce centered on its shores. There is no doubt that injury—to a great extent irremediable—has been already inflicted, not only upon some of the owners of property on its margin, but also upon the river itself, more espe- cially upon its approaches. Your Committee conceive that the nature and extent of this injury should be determined as accurately and as speedily as possible ; that the trade on this river is vastly too important in its relation to the national prosperity, for the subject of this inquiry to be left to a committee, however zealous, which is unendowed with pecuniary resources, and dependent for information upon the researches of gentlemen actively engaged in official and professional occupations; and that the result of such an investigation would be highly beneficial to the science of harbour engineering. The scientific value of the information so acquired would be greatly enhanced were the phenomena of all our tidal harbours subjected to similar research. It is not unreasonable to expect that the ultimate result would give greater certainty as to the influence of projected works upon the well-being of the harbours with which they are associated ; and relieve the Legislature from the responsibility of sanctioning undertakings the destructive or conservative effects of which, at present, are often very speculative. Harrowsy, Chairman. GrorcE RENNIE. P. M. Grey Ecerron. ANDREW HENDERSON. R. I. Murcutson. JosErH Boutt, Secretary. F. W. Brecuey. Report on the past and present state of the Estuary of the Mersey within the last seventy years, as derived from historical records, and according to the maps, charts, and reports of different Engineers, and which have been laid before the Committee appointed by the British Association at its meeting at Liverpool, September 1854, to investigate and report upon the same. By GerorceE Renniz, F.R.S. The early history of the Mersey, previous to the beginning of the present century, is confined to the uncertain statements of topographical writers such as Leland, Gough, King, Ormerod, Mortimer, and others; and the charts of Captain Collins in 1689, and by M‘Kenzie in 1760. According to the original constitution of the charters and grants made from time to time to the borough of Liverpool, the boundaries of that port were adopted by a commission issued 19th July, 32 Charles II., which recited an Act passed in the 14th year of the then king’s reign, tor ‘‘ preventing frauds and regulating abuses in the Customs ;” and also an Act of the Ist of Elizabeth, It was settled in November 1680, that the boundaries of the port Pe THE RIVER MERSEY. 5 of Liverpool should be “from the Red Stones on the point of Wirrall south- erly, to the foot of the Ribble water in a direct line northerly, and so upon the south side of the said river to Hesketh Bank easterly.” These limits were adopted in the Dock Act of Anne, and subsequent dock acts, as the limits of the crown revenues, and have been adhered to down to the present time. ‘The limits of the old borough and parish of Liverpool bordering on the Mersey are thus defined, viz.—‘“‘ The western boundary commences at low-water mark of the River Mersey, where a brook, called Beacon’s Gutter, enters the river, and continues thence southward along the low-water mark of the said river, to the centre of a certain slip or basin called Etna Slip. The southern boundary commences from the centre of Etna Slip, and runs from thence to the eastward, across the southernmost end of the Queen’s Dock. The northern boundary returns along the Beacon’s Gutter, to the beforementioned low-water mark of the river.” The 8th of Anne, 1709, defined the limits of the port of Liverpool to extend as far as “a certain place in Hoylake called the Red Stones, and from thence all over the River Mersey to Warrington and Frodsham Bridges.” These boundaries and rights of the - Mayor, Aldermen, and Burgesses to the lordships of Liverpool, comprising the River Mersey up to the bridges and to the strand at Liverpool, Toxteth Park, Birkenhead, and Wallasey, are fully explained in the accompanying statement, No. 6, as also in the second memorial of the Liverpool Corporation to the Admiralty, No. 4. According to a statement made by Mr. Rollet, surveyor of Wallasey embankment, at the fifth meeting of the Architectural and Archeological Society of Liverpool, in 1854, the sea had formerly effected a direct entrance into the valley of the Mersey through its present channel, from which, he believed, it had been separated previously by a diluvial deposit of clay, boulders, and sand, and that after it had so effected its entrance, its progress, in forming a deep channel, would be gradual. In proof of which he cited the authority of Captain Collins, “That great ships belonging to Liverpool put out at Hyle, or Hoylake, part of their lading until they are light enough to sail over the flats of Liverpool.” ' The charts of Collins and M‘Kenzie, although valuable as records, can scarcely be depended upon. ‘The first authentic survey of the port of Liver- pool, by Captain George Thomas, in 1813, and published in 1815, and the subsequent and more accurate surveys of Denham, in 1833 and 1837, and of Lord, in 1840, 1841 and 1852, are proofs of the anxiety evinced by the Corporation of Liverpool to employ officers of the Admiralty in recording accurately the actual state of the banks and channels, and the changes which have taken place between those periods. ‘These are very fully detailed in the accompanying report of Mr. Boult, who has taken more than usual pains to compare the different plans with one another and with Captain Thomas's, and has shown in contour and coloured lines the remarkable changes which have taken place in the sea banks and channels at the entrance of the Mersey. These changes show the necessity of causing annual surveys to be made, as set forth in the report of Messrs. Mylne and Rennie, in 1837. - The history of the Mersey is also well detailed in the accompanying report of Messrs. John and George Wilkin. Those gentlemen show that, in 1818, Mr. Whidbey, of Plymouth, was the first whose assistance was called in by the Mayor and Corporation to examine the encroachments which had been _ made on the estuary in different parts, and to lay down some general princi- ples as to its future preservation. Subsequently, Mr. Rennie, sen., Messrs. _ Chapman, Giles, Walker, Mylne, Stevenson, and George and John Rennie, -Yeported in confirmation. Extracts from the reports of some of these engi- 6 REPORT—1856, neers will show how their predictions have been corroborated, and how necessary it was to frame and constitute a Commission of Conservancy. This was done upon the principles laid down by Messrs. W. C. Mylne and George Rennie, in their report of 1837, as also from the assistance of the marine surveyor, Lieutenant Lord. The general principles laid down by Messrs. Whidbey, Chapman and Rennie, in their report of 1822, to the Corporation of Liverpool, were— « That all channels through which water flows must be of a magnitude proportional to the quantity which passes them; and any increase or dimi- nution of that quantity will enlarge or diminish the channel, unless where formed of material so hard that the strength of the current is not able to remove them.” Mr. Whidbey says, in his report of 1818, “Tide harbours are deep or otherwise, in proportion to the quantity of water that flows into them from the esa, and the fresh water that comes down from the interior. The greater the quantity of water, the greater will be the depth, from the effect which the increased body of water will have in scouring the bottom at the time of the ebb tide, and carrying out the sullage.” Again, with reference to embankments, Mr. Whidbey says,— “It is evident that if a certain portion of either side of a river or harbour be embanked, and the tide be prevented from flowing over it in its usual way, a diminished quantity of water will flow in from the sea equal to the cubic contents of what has been embanked, and consequently there will be a less quantity to ebb out; and the scouring effect being thereby lessened, it will be rendered incapable of carrying out to sea the sullage and alluvious matter washed down from the country, with the same force as before the embankment was made.” The same principle was advocated by Messrs. Chapman, Rennie, Walker, Giles and Stevenson, in all their subsequent reports relative to encroachments, and to obstructions made to the free flow of the tide by piers and jetties. The very accurate survey and maps of the estuary made by Mr. Giles for the Corporation, by the recommendation of the late Mr. Rennie, is one of the most valuable records of any harbour in existence. It forms, in fact, the standard for all future surveys, with reference to any changes which may take place. The annexed is a catalogue of the reports which have been made by the engineers and surveyors of the Mersey. The calculation of the area and contents of the estuary of the Mersey between the Blackrock at entrance, and Woolston Weir above Warrington, as shown by the annexed tables, No. 2, are taken from Mr. G. Rennie’s report of 1838. Captain Denham, the surveyor to the port, in his report of 1836, gives his opinions on the causes of variations of the Devil and Pluckington Banks, and expresses considerable doubt how far their removal could be effected by jetties projected from the Cheshire shore. Lieutenant Lord, who succeeded him as surveyor, in his report of 3rd April, 1840, proposed a similar remedy. The question had been previously dis- cussed, and remedies proposed, by former engineers. Lieutenant Lord’s report of the 23rd March, 1840, entirely coincides with the opinion of former engineers in the necessity of preserving the whole of the estuary and its tributary streams from encroachments, and the necessity of guarding the shores from the action of the winds and waves by defences of stone, and that the limits of high-water margin should be accurately defined. j . As regards the tides, these have been accurately defined for a long period: } THE RIVER MERSEY, Z by Mr. Giles, in his great survey ; and the very valuable observations on the rise and fall of the tides in the Mersey, from Formby Point to Warrington Bridge, taken during the years 1840, 1841, 1842, and 1843, by Mr. Rendell— as shown by the diagrams in the first and second volumes of Mr. Thomas Webster’s work, 1848, 1853—leave, nothing to be desired in point of excellence. With such records, the Commissioners of Conservancy have only to impress upon their surveyors the necessity of making frequent inspec- tions of the whole of the estuary, and annual surveys of its banks and channels, so that this invaluable port shall be maintained, in future, in its full integrity. Mr. Boult’s report, which accompanies this, enters most fully into the details of the changes which have taken place in the direction and depths of the sea channels. The increase or diminution of the sand-banks, from the first publication of Captain George Thomas’s map, in 1815, down to 1854, accompanied by an elaborate table, showing the average cubical contents of the Great Burbo, Brazil, and North Bank, and the banks of Formby, Taylor, Jordan, Mud-wharf, Middle, Little Burbo, and Outlying, and East Hoyle, from which it will be seen that in 1840 there is a slight decrease from 1837 ; for the years 1846 and 1852 a considerable increase ; and a slight diminution in 1854. These tables are analysed with great minuteness by Mr. Boult ; and the accompanying charts, in colours, illustrate distinctly the variations*. The valuable meteorological and historical information which Mr. Boult has brought forward, entitle him to the best thanks of the Committee. London, July 18, 1856. GEORGE RENNIE. No. 1.—Report of the Messrs. Wilkin relative to the Navigation and Con- servancy of the River Mersey. ‘ Spring Gardens, 28th April, 1840. Sir,—We have the honour of referring to our letter of the 18th April, 1839, in which we observed, that much more information than we at that time possessed would be wanting to enable us to make a final report on the state of the River Mersey, and for recommending such measures for the improvement of the navigation, and for preventing further encroachments on its shores. This inquiry has caused much labour and aitention on our parts, Mr. George Wilkin having been almost entirely occupied in this business from the beginning of the month of March 1839, and having spent nearly three months in Liverpool for the purpose of communicating with those most competent to render us assistance. We were unable to proceed without a regular survey, and for that purpose, at our recommendation, the Corpora- tion employed Mr. Eyes to make an accurate report and survey of the shore : within the port of Liverpool (No. 1+), which contains the description and _ customs in each township, showing whether the same is a manor, or reputed manor, and whether courts are held, and whether any, and what, claims are made to the shore, or any privileges exercised therein. The names of the proprietors of land adjoining the beach, the encroachments made thereon, and the enclosures of marshes over which the tide formerly flowed in the upper part of the river, which exceed 13,000 acres. : We beg leave to represent, that the obstructions to the navigation of the * See note, page 2. : } * The figures in Messrs. Whidbey’s report refer to documents which are not printed ~7? s 8 REPORT—1856. Mersey having of late years been the subject of much complaint, attracted the attention of the Corporation of Liverpool, who have, from the year 1818 to the present time, in their anxiety to improve the navigation of the river, expended large sums of money in consulting the most eminent engineers, and in obtaining their reports, opinions and surveys on the state of the river; viz. in the year 1818, the late Mr. Whidbey, the contractor of the Break- water at Plymouth ; in 1832, a second report from him, in conjunction with Messrs. Chapman and John Rennie; in 1823, by Mr. Chapman; in 1826, by Mr. Whidbey, and Messrs. George Rennie and Giles; in 1826, a second report from Mr. Giles; in 1827, by Mr. Robert Stevenson, also by Messrs. Walker and Mylne; in 1826, by Captain Denham, R.N., and in 1837, by Messrs. Mylne and G. Rennie. The late Mr. Telford, Messrs. Nimmo and Fowls have also been consulted by the Corporation and reported thereon No. 2). : It ed from the evidence (No.3) taken before a committee of the House of Commons in the session of 1838, on a bill of the Grand Junction Railway Company, in which they proposed to erect a bridge over the Mersey at Runcorn, and to take a branch of the railway over it (which was rejected), that the area of the Mersey from Black Rock at the Mouth to Woolston Weir above Warrington Bridge (where the tide ceases), is 23,062 acres, over which, at a 29-feet tide, 736,945,215 tons of water flow, and that no less than 13,440 acres of marshes have been abstracted from the tideway, equal to about 25 millions of tons of water, calculated at the same tide. For the purpose of more clearly showing the want of a proper authority to control and improve the navigation of the Mersey, we have thought it de- sirable to make extracts from the Reports of the engineers; all of whom are of opinion that the principal causes for obstructing the navigation of the river are the embankments made for enclosing large tracts of marsh lands over which the tide formerly flowed ; the numerous piers, jetties and che- vrons which impede the flux and reflux of the tide, and decrease the water space. They observe, that all the channels through which water flows must be of a magnitude proportional to the quantity passing through them; that if a certain portion of cither side of a river or harbour be embanked, and the tide be prevented from flowing over it in its usual way, a diminished quan- tity of water will flow in from the sea equal to the cubic contents of what has been embanked, consequently there will be a less quantity to ebb out, thereby decreasing the scouring effect, and preventing the sullage and allu- vial matter being washed down with sufficient force to prevent the old chan- nels becoming choked up. They further state, that the preservation and improvement of navigable channels depend entirely upon the flux and reflux of the tide and the dis- charge of fresh waters, which cause an effectual scour. That in no case can there be too much backwater, it being well known that a number of rivers and harbours have been ruined from the want of preserving the backwater. Two harbours are noticed by Mr. Whidbey, viz. Portsmouth, as having been seriously injured, and Rye, as having been entirely ruined by encroach- ments on the mud land. Report dated 17th July, 1818 (No.2).—Mr. Whidbey says, the Mersey is an inlet of the sea, rather than a river, being kept open entirely by the quantity of water that flows into it, and not by the trifling streams which it receives at Warrington and Frodsham Bridges; that tidal harbours are deep or otherwise in proportion to the quantity of water that flows into them from THE RIVER MERSEY. 9 the sea, and the fresh water that comes down from the interior ; the greater the quantity of water, the greater will be the depth from the effect which the increased body of water will have in scouring the bottom at the time of the ebb tide in carrying out the sullage. He observes, that if all the mud lands above and below Ince, and above and below Runcorn, were embanked, leaving a channel only for the waters that come from the country to discharge themselves, the total ruin of Liver- pool would be the consequence. The backwater would be so much dimi- nished that the scouring effect would be destroyed, and the sand driven in towards the entrance of the Mersey by the violence of the north-west and western gales, would in time accumulate beyond the possibility of removal. He alludes to an Act passed in the 46 Geo. III. cap. 153, for protecting harbours and navigable rivers, but considers it does not go far enough, and thinks the Corporation should lose no time in obtaining an Act giving them the necessary powers for the preservation of the harbour of Liverpool, re- serving to the Mersey and Irwell Company all powers granted to them under their Acts. He further observes, that it is a prevailing opinion, that if water-courses be narrowed, the channels through which the water has to run will become deeper ; which would be the case if the water always ran one way, being pro- duced from springs in the country ; it must be discharged into the sea some- where, therefore the more it is confined the deeper will be the channel through which it runs, but the contrary will be the case where the tide runs in and out every twelve hours. Report dated 25th May, 1822 (No. 2).—Messrs. Whidbey, Chapman and John Rennie state, that on a careful examination between Runcorn and Fidler’s Ferry at high and low water they found large tracts of marsh land without the present line of banks, and serving as important receptacles for backwater. On the banks and shores they observed numerous jetties, erected for the protection of the land against the violence of the current, extending in many instances much further than necessary, and for the most part ope- rating as injurious impediments to the tideway, which, by obstructing its course, diminish its velocity, and allow time for the alluvial matter with which it is impregnated to be deposited and form banks and shoals highly injurious to the navigation, particularly mentioning one at Halton, and another near the old Quay Canal entrance. The Ince Ferry Quay has also an injurious effect, but they do not recommend its removal, on account of its absolute necessity for the purposes of commerce, but that openings should be made through it in various places, and arching them over. Several other jetties are detrimental, and should be removed. They also recommend that no time should be lost in obtaining sufficient powers to enable the Corporation to have the complete conservatorship or control of the river Mersey and all its branches, to the end that when any encroachments are making by jetties, embankments or otherwise, they may have full power to cause them to be removed. In obtaining the powers here recommended, they*conceive there can be little or no difficulty, for all the leading interests of the country are combined in the necessity of maintaining and improving the navigation of the port of Liverpool, and none more so than the adjacent landholders, the value of whose estates must necessarily rise and fall with the population of this great commercial emporium, which is certainly of far greater importance to them than any advantage that can be derived from the acquisition of any land over which the tide flows. 10 REPORT—1856. | Report dated 26th June, 1826 (No. 2).—Messrs. Whidbey, G. Rennie and Giles make strong observations on the jetties, piers and chevrons from Fid- ler’s Ferry to Halton Point, which they think should be removed. They also notice the land embanked by Sir R. Brooke, and the encroachments made by the Mersey and Irwell Company, also at Ince Quay, Tranmere Bay, Wallasey Pool, and Seacombe. They recommend that a quay or other boundary-line along the whole of the shores of the river Mersey and its inlets within the influence of the tide, should be accurately defined upon plans confirmed by Parliament. In order also that this important object may be effected in the most conciliatory and equitable manner, it should as far as possible be concerted with the land- owners upon the principle of compensation for such lands as may be required for that purpose. : Report dated 4th October, 1826 (No. 2).—Mr. Giles is of opinion, that by the means of a shore and river:wall such a uniformity of flood and ebb cur- rent will be established up and down the river as to produce the best scouring effect of the tide and land waters, and particularly upon the ebb tide, which will be directed more forcibly upon the south-east end of the Liverpool shore than at present, so as not only to prevent a further accumulation of bank, but most probably to lessen the present extent and height of it. That the further result of forming such uniform lines of shore and river-wall will equalize and distribute the currents more over the river above Liverpool in particular, so as to prevent in a great degree the accumulation of mud and other sediment under the river-walls, and at the entrance to the docks gene- rally, and at the same time render the navigation of vessels more direct and easy than can be the case through the various partial forces of currents and eddies of the present tideway. Report dated December 1826 (No. 2).—Messrs. Rennie and Giles have given particular consideration to the sea channels, and to the river from Black Rock to Runcorn, and from thence to Woolston Weir, where the tide ceases. They say it is admitted by all intelligent and impartial men, that the pre- servation and improvement of the navigable channels of a river depend en- tirely upon the flux and reflux of the tidal waters, and the discharge of fresh waters, and that these have the most powerful effect during high spring tides and rainy seasons in scouring and deepening the channels through which such waters must flow. It is scarcely possible that a case can exist where a port or river can have too much backwater. ‘There is a material tendency of the flood tide to drive in from the sea portions of sand, and a similar tendency of the inland waters to bring down sand and alluvial matter, and these find upon some parts of the shore of a river places and eddies where certain depusitions of them will take place, and thus diminish the capacity of the river to that degree as will nearly balance or bring into equilibrium the content of water in the river with the power or force of currents which that content will produce both in its howing into and ebbing out of the river. Taking it therefore as an axiom that no such thing can occur as a harbour having too much backwater, except what may be pro- duced occasionally by mountain torrents, but not by the reflow of tidal waters, the general principle that the tide of a river, particularly in the upper parts of it, should be carefully protected by all possible means, is applicable in its fullest extent in the case of the Mersey, the fact of there being no excess of backwater in the Mersey having been fully ascertained. _ It is too obvious to need argument, that water ebbing from the higher parts of the Mersey is infinitely more valuable than from the lower parts for THE RIVER MERSEY. ll the purpose of effecting a scour; the water from the highest parts having to run through the greatest length of the navigable channels in its passage to Liverpool, and afterwards through the sea channels at a period when the tidal waters have considerably ebbed, and when those channels are narrowed within the banks that enclose them. The centre of Liverpool is about three and a half miles above the mouth of the river, while Runcorn is nearly twenty miles; the value, therefore, of the tide at Runcorn compared with that at Liverpool (taking it only at the relative distance between those places), is nearly as 5 to 1; but it is also beneficial in a manifold degree in consequence of its operating so much more powerfully to scour the bed of the channels at Liverpool and the sea channels than any water can do which is discharged from situations nearer the mouth of the river in the early parts of the ebb tide. Another circum. stance may be cited in favour of preserving the tidal waters at Runcorn, and particularly upon the flat stones near to the level of high water. The fact has been proved by Mr. Giles, that the spring tides actually rise one“ foot and a half higher at Runcorn than at Liverpool, consequently any enclosure of such shores at Runcorn must be exceedingly injurious. Too much vigilance therefore cannot be exercised in preserving the tidal waters at Runcorn, and also in having it discharged by the natural ebb of the tide. Report dated 30th January, 1827 (No. 2).—Mr. R. Stevenson states, as a principle which ought to regulate all operations upon the banks of rivers, that backwaters, are essential to the preservation of such rivers in a navi- gable state; and with regard to the Mersey, he is of opinion that the great influx and reflux of tides into this estuary every twelve hours is what alone preserves the Horse and Formby Channels in their present navigable state. To the preservation of these channels all the arguments relating to the back- water resolve themselves. An alteration in the depth or direction of these channels might be attended with consequences most serious to Liverpool, encumbered as its entrance is with sand-banks of a great extent. He also recommends that the jurisdiction of the conservators should follow the high-water mark in all its gambols, though trenching sometimes upon one side of the estuary and sometimes upon the other, and that they should take the most prompt cognizance of all works undertaken upon the ebb, or between the points of high and low water. He conceives that a distinction should be made between works intended for the legitimate pur- pose of navigation, and those which have for their object the acquirement of firm ground at the expense of the backwaters of the river. Report dated 31st January, 1827 (No. 2).—Messrs. Walker and Mylne state that the Mersey is only deeper at Liverpool than at Warrington, be- cause the greater quantity of water at Liverpool requires a greater area to passit. If the tide was excluded, the Mersey at Liverpool would by the de- - posit of matter brought down from the interior soon diminish to the same size as at Warrington, and the entrance from the sea would soon sand up, leaving space sufficient only to pass the water of the river in this diminished state. Report dated 27th September, 1836 (No. 2*).—Captain Denham says, the progress of Pluckington Bank, since 1828, has been a horizontal increase of 210 yards abreast of Brunswick Basin, abreast of King’s Dock 123 yards, and abreast of Duke’s Dock only 40 yards. Its respective elevations he - cannot quote between these dates, but since 1834 he finds it grown up one. foot off Brunswick Dock, two feet off Brunswick Basin, three feet off Duke’s * Reprinted at length in No. 5 herewith, 12 REPORT—1856. Dock, and one foot off Canning Dock, during which its low-water margin has yielded 50 yards directly off Brunswick Basin. Simultaneous with this two years’ fluctuation, the Devil’s Bank has warped 143 yards towards the eastern shore, lowered in altitude four feet, but elongated towards Plucking- ton Shelf 250 yards, so that the spit of the Devil’s Bank and Pluckington Shelf is within one-fourth of a mile of uniting with each other,—an event to be feared, seeing that the Devil’s Spit has elongated two-thirds of a mile in eight years, but which should be averted with all anxiety, for in the space between them being shoaled up to a bar of six feet instead of fifteen, the Garston branch of the Mersey will scour its way through the Swatchway just above Otter’s Pool, dividing the Devil’s Bank from Eastham Sands, and join the main column of ebb stream down the Cheshire side of the river. Report dated March 1837 (No. 2).—Messrs. Mylne and G. Rennie state, that from a rough estimate of the quantity of land which has been em- banked out of the river above Runcorn, and which is still under the level of ordinary spring tides (or 22 feet on the Old Dock Sill), the present water surface only amounts to one-fifth of the whole. Below Runcorn the marshes of Widness, Ditton, Frodsham, Stanlow, and Wallasey, amount to nearly one-half the whole; or in other words, the total quantity of land embanked out of the Mersey exceeds the total quantity of water surface. In laying down quay lines in the Mersey, the following principles should be ad- hered to :— Ist. To preserve to the fullest extent the receptacles for the tide water. 2nd. To designate the boundaries by mere stones placed at intervals. 3rd. To have power to excavate and improve the bed of the river. 4th. To prevent encroachments, whether by embanking lands or accumu- lating matter by means of jetties. 5th. To prevent jetties, or other open or solid works of any kind, from being projected into the river without the consent of the Conservators. 6th. To prevent ballast or other soiid matter from being thrown into the river, 7th. To raise and remove wrecks or other obstructions. 8th. To cut off or remove projecting points of rocks, without prejudice to existing interests, buildings or jetties which may tend to obstruct the free effect of the current of the tides; and to erect quay walls or other works which may assist the operation or diversion of the tide for the general benefit of the port. They conclude by recommending a Commission of Conservancy, not only for the benefit of the port, but the public in general. For the remedy of the evils mentioned in their reports, the engineers all recommend that the conservancy should be vested in the Corporation of Liverpool by Act of Parliament, with powers to remedy these evils, and to render the navigation as perfect as circumstances will admit. We have been induced to make these copious extracts from the reports, as they so clearly point out the difficulties attending the navigation of the river, and the probability of the most serious consequences following, if powers are not given to the Corporation by Act of Parliament, to improve the navigation. We have personally inspected the state of the river, and are perfectly satisfied with the correctness of their reports and observations thereon, and are convinced that the navigation is yearly becoming more difficult, and that the obstructions will continue to increase if Parliamentary “ite is not made for its improvement, perhaps to the ultimate ruin of the port. eS Py Greer THE RIVER MERSEY. 13 The Corporation of Liverpool brought the state of the river under the special consideration of the late Mr. Huskisson in the year 1828; that emi- nent statesman gave the subject his most serious consideration: he viewed with alarm the numerous encroachments making, which he considered would, if allowed to go on, at no very remote period in all probability prove highly prejudicial to the navigation, and was persuaded that a Commission of Con- servancy should be without delay appointed, consisting of not more than three Commissioners, including the Mayor of Liverpool, to be constituted by Act of Parliament, or by the Crown, reserving to His Majesty the power of appointing additional Commissioners if it should hereafter be found ne- cessary. That his suggestions were fully approved by Lord Lowther, then Chief Commissioner of Woods and Forests, and by Mr. Arbuthnot, the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, appears from the Correspondence (No. 4). His melancholy death occurred before the business was finally arranged. And by the reform of corporate bodies, and from other causes, no effectual measure was taken till the session of the year 1837, when a bill was brought into Parliament by the Corporation of Liverpool, which was objected to by Government in consequence of the extensive powers sought for, and was consequently withdrawn on the understanding that the subject should be hereafter taken up by the Board of Trade. The public bodies most materially interested in the navigation of the Mersey, are the Mersey and Irwell Navigation, the Duke of Bridgewater’s Canal, the River Weaver Navigation, the Ellesmere Canal, and the Sankey Canal Companies. We have understood that objections have been raised by some of these companies to the Corporation of Liverpool having a pre- vailing interest in the conservancy. For the purpose of meeting the wishes of these most important and highly respectable bodies, and also those of the influential, commercial, and agricultural interests connected with the Port of Liverpool, or the River Mersey, we have personally waited on the Mayor of Manchester and the town authorities of Warrington, and the gentlemen taking the most prominent part in the management of the Canal and Navigation Companies. We have also seen the Earl of Sefton, the - auditor of the Earl of Derby’s estates (both of these noble lords having considerable estates adjoining the river), Mr. Potts of Chester, on the part of several landowners on the Cheshire shore, as well as for the Ellesmere Canal Company, for whom he acts, and other landed proprietors having property adjoining the Mersey. We think it proper to annex notes of the observations made (No. 5), from which it will appear that they all concur in the propriety of an effective Conservancy being appointed, but some of them express a strong feeling against the Corporation of Liverpool being invested with more power than what is given to other public bodies, and the Mersey and Irwell Company only seemed inclined to contribute to the ex- pense of the Conservancy. It is our desire to pay every respect to the opinions of these highly re- spectable and important companies, and to meet their wishes if possible; but we cannot lose sight of the correct view taken by the late Mr. Huskis- son, that if the Conservancy was teo numerous it would probably be ineffec- tive; and we cannot therefore recommend that the Commission should, in the first instance, exceed four, though we should much prefer its being limited to three only, viz. the Mayor of Liverpool for the time being, with power to nominate one of the Aldermen to act for him in case his public duties should engage too much of his time; one of the Dock Trustees, and one on the part of the public conversant with the state of the river; 14 . REPORT—1856. to communicate with the Board of Trade on all points affecting the navigation. If it should be considered advisable, a fourth Commissioner may be appointed,—the Canal and Navigation Companies to make this appoint- ment from one of their body. The Corporation of Liverpool propose to bear two-thirds of the expense, and the Dock Trustees the other third. The Conservancy can, in our opinion, only be efficiently formed by a public Act, in which powers may be given to the Board of Trade for increasing the number of Commissioners, if hereafter found necessary ;—or to commence by a Commission from the Crown, as suggested by Lord Lowther to Mr. Huskisson, obtaining when necessary increased powers from Parliament. The Conservancy of the River Thames appears to have been first ap- pointed by charter in the third year of the reign of James I., and after- wards extended by several Acts of Parliament from the reign of George III. We would take the liberty of recommending that the powers of the Con- servators of the Mersey should assimilate, as nearly as circumstances will admit, to those of the Thames; and that the shore of the river or of the sea within the Port of Liverpool should not be vested in them, but should remain in the Crown, or in other persons legally holding the same, and should not be taken or used by the Conservators without permission or purchase. Nor should the Conservators be authorized to interfere with the extensive enclosures of the marshes above Runcorn, or in the River Weaver, which are of a very ancient date; nor with the numerous jetties, chevrons (unless they are longer than necessary, and obstruct the navigation of the river), or other encroachments; but that their operations should, in the . first instance, be confined entirely to the bed of the river, in scouring the same with proper machinery, and in making new channels and removing obstructions. It is not for Liverpool alone that a Conservancy is wanting, nor for the Navigation Companies connected with the Mersey : it is of equal importance to Manchester, and all the other manufacturing towns in Lancashire, Cheshire, Yorkshire and Staffordshire, and to the general commercial and shipping interests of the kiugdom. If the measure is properly carried into effect, it will be beneficial to the interests of the community at large. We have thought it advisable to request the Corporation of Liverpool to state their views as to the plan of operations in the event of Conservancy being granted. The Town Clerk has favoured us with two letters from Lieutenant Lord, R.N. (No.2)*, the marine surveyor of the port, to the chairman of the Con- servancy Committee. He recommends that the lines of high water should be accurately marked and defined, and that no future encroachments should be allowed without authority. That the edges of the banks, which in the upper part of the river are composed of earthy sward, should be protected by a facing of stone or other suitable material, to prevent any part from _ being carried away by the tide. This, he says, would render permanent a scouring force of water, which would maintain the sea-approaches in an effective state, and it would then remain to watch the changes that might arise in the sand-banks in the river and its approaches, and to adopt such timely remedies as might be necessary. He refers particularly to the dredg- ing operations which were so successfully carried on for a period of ten months during the last year, by which means a most valuable channel was * Nos. 7 and 8 herewith. ad pet THE RIVER MERSEY. . ~ 15 opened at a small expense ;—that its success depended entirely on the column of water running out of the Mersey on the ebb tide, and to a mi- nute attention to what was taking place in that region. He considers the natural formation of the Mersey admirably adapted for scouring and keeping open the sea-channels, if encroachments are not allowed to be made on its banks; but he doubts the propriety of scarping or removing rocks. We cannot venture to give an opinion as to the most practicable mode of improving the navigation. The Conservators wili (if appointed), as a matter of course, consult the most eminent engineers as to the best means of proceeding ; but we think the navigation would be much improved if the plan of dredging with machinery, so successfully adopted in the Victoria Channel, was followed up in the river. It is most desirable to make it ap- parent to the Navigation Companies, to the landowners, and to all other parties interested, that in appointing a Conservancy the public good only is looked to, and that there is no intention whatever to interfere with private interests, which will be duly preserved and protected. If the President: and Lords of the Board of Trade be pleased to approve of a Conservancy being established by Act’of Parliament, we will prepare a bill founded on the practice in the River Thames for their Lordships’ approval, making special provisions for preserving the rights of the Mersey and Irwell Company, and those of all other Companies connected with the River Mersey. We also beg to send a statement delivered to us by the Town Clerk of Liverpool, with a map of the river (Nos. 6 and 7), showing the rights of the Mayor, Aldermen, and Burgesses to the Lordship of Liverpool, comprising the River Mersey up to Warrington and Frodsham Bridges, and the Strand at Liverpool, Toxteth Park, Birkenhead, and Wallasey, which the Corpora- tion wish to be noticed in our Report; from which it appears that the 18th Section of the Act of the 2nd George III. cap. 86, authorizes them as Trustees of the Docks, by authority from twenty-five of their body, to re- move such nuisances as may be necessary for improving, scouring, and keeping open the navigation from the sea as far southwards as the Lordship extends; and by the Dock Acts of the 39th George III. cap. 59. sec. 29, and 57 George III. cap. 143. sec. 80, their water-bailiff and harbour-master _ have special powers over vessels, wrecks, and obstructions. It would there- fore seem that Parliament intended to give powers to the Corporation which are not considered sufficient to constitute an efficient Conservancy. We have the honour to be, Sir, Your most obedient Servants, , (Signed) Joun Wirxin. Dennis Le Marchant, Esq. GEORGE WILKIN. j ¢ ‘ “gest ‘Ae JO IST ‘SINNAY ‘OUD Aq ut waAty £68'L OFF'el PEP see w eres en eeeeetee UOPZUIAIV A, PUL UIOIUNY . 9c8'S seco reser eee ee eeeeee UO}ZULUIVAA 0} ULOIUNY 199\40q, 09¢ sere ster esc essesseces SOUpIM PU UOBICE cove seer evs esear seen cces SOUPTAA PUL 1094T a epcwcescs eee a8piig sa0qe AaTeA Weysporg ‘Opl} 399J-FZ 3e SUOTTIIM Qg pur hs oe cece cena ccec cc esec cece Ls tee oa vn ne seve cece ee eeeeeeecereees SQUsIR, WYSpoLy pty 309J-ZZ JV 10}VM JO SUO} JO SUOTTTIM GZ yNOGe IO GGL ocicret crete tects szaataM pur wLyspoay WSs ccs SIR PIOBULL, *AVMOPT} OY} 0} ASO] SAYSeUI pasojo QGe clit ttt ttt OlqMoIg pue examMULI], sKasuyemy «= GoM'R Se Aasey[e Ay U2 SO10B OFF'EL PUL ‘Ta UOFSTOOM 0} YOY Youlgq ‘say "Sa10Y wioy Aosta JOATY OY} UL solov ZOO'EZ 2B aoYT, “SUHSUV] LIVS “SHHSUVI, OGNVINT vote eeeeseeeee TBIOg, ogee’ 1es‘Z6z |290'Es | $12‘SF6'9EL |Z90'8s | 0S9'6E0'189 |290'ES | 619‘080'ZE9 |620'Ss | 09E°SL9'9FF |016 02 LEL‘VLE‘BEl | S269 | BBL‘660' 11 | - S6U'l0L =: |Z + frees soysaeyy Arpung goo‘oss't |ezt |soL'rsat |Zet | 8zs‘6s6 raat ‘ ‘ watest ‘ “ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ 03 ere'eco'6t lore’t | 6rs‘osr‘ot jore'l |ers‘zoz‘el lore't |eea‘oze'or |Z0e'l | Zac'scs's 016 Pee c ie S|) pene poe | cabanas ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ G ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ é . “d G16'L8S' TLL 009'1z | 868'6E2'61L [009'T2 | £28'S28'999 [0091 | ez1‘600'TZ9 |009'TS | SEL‘OSF'FFF o00'0S | " ** | Tt e ie anon *SOUT] 10}BM MOT JO LELPS'El | 6BS'9 | ZSL‘6GO'TIS| °° Mop JO 4U94xe at} 0} YoY Youpg mor +1038 M\ JO SUOT,| *saroy [1078 AA JO SUD} *saI0y *19}8 AA Jo suoy,| ‘sa10y ‘1ayBA\ JO SUOT,| ‘sedoy |*19}BA\ Jo SUOT,| ‘say |*1OIVAA JO SUOT,) “SALW | *1OIVA\ JOSUOT, | "sotdy *2PY 499J-FZ JO "TUS 320d Pro tood ‘IHS 490d PIO jood “nS ‘Ins gdesaav ue 410 ‘1Z8L ‘opt 429J-36 IV *aply 4995-06 IV “20AVT 9AOqE “ULE "ST | ~TOAVT Odoqe 'urg “9 i | x20 pro 19odseary POC PIO joodseavy “| ‘gnady “ure ‘3783 9V vi 10 ‘sapy Sutads jo yxvur | 10 ‘sepy duau ye yrvur fotel, ‘ut 6 ‘93 8 mojaq ‘ur 6 "35 1 4 2 OIA YFIY aSvr9av ue ZV | 1ayesi YSty advsoae uv yy) ‘opy uuds‘1oyeM MoT | ‘opry dou ‘199vmA Mo'T IIS JOC PIO [oodearyT eaoge pue AMO[9q SOPL, Ule}IOd 7e ‘UOISuTAIEAA BAOGR “TIAAA UOYSJOOAA 0} YOoY your wou ‘Aosta Joa Oy} Ul Jaqv A, JO }U9jU0) pUuk LoIy—~G "ON THE RIVER MERSEY. 17 No. 3.-—Index of the Engineers’ and Surveyors’ Reports who have reported on the Estuary and River Mersey. Extract of Mr. Rennie’s report as to any one dock, 1809. Mr. Whidbey, ditto, 1818. Late Mr. Rennie’s ditto, on Ditton Embankment, 11th October, 1819. Ditto, Messrs. Whidbey, Chapman and Rennie, upon the lines of wharf walls at the south and north ends of the docks upon Pluckington Bank, 1822. Mr. Telford on Mersey and Irwell Works, 29th January, 1823. Messrs. Telford and Nimmo on same subject, 1823, Ditto, on Mersey and Irwell Navigation, June 1823. Mr. John Rennie, jun., in reply to above Report, July 26, 1823. Mr. Whidbey on ditto, July 14, 1823. Mr. Chapman on ditto, July 18, 1823. Messrs. Whidbey, Rennie and Giles, 1826. Mr. Giles proposed Conservancy line, 1826. Messrs. Rennie and Giles on Conservancy of River generally, 1826. Messrs. Whidbey and Giles, afterwards J. Walker, on Embankments, 14th August, 1826. Messrs. Stevenson, ditto, ditto, 1827. Messrs. Walker and Mylne, ditto, 1827. es Messrs. G. Rennie, James Walker, R. Stevenson, F. Giles, and W. C. Mylne on Viner’s Embankment and Ince’s Quay, 1827. Messrs. Telford, Stevenson and Nimmo, on new sea-ports in Rivers Dee and Mersey, with a ship channel, 1828. Mr. Chapman’s Report on the effect on the navigation of River likely to result from works, 1823. Mr. George Rennie on the effect of New Brighton Pier, 8th December, 1834. Captain Denham on Mr. Lace’s projection, and Pluckington Bank and Devil’s projection, and proposing a river wall, 1836. Report of Messrs. Mylne and Rennie on Mersey, 1837. Letter from Lieut. Lord, recommending mode in which the Conservancy should be effected, 1840. Second letter ditto, 1840. Captain Evans on River Mersey, May 29, 1844. Mr. George Rennie on Seacombe Pier and Pluckington Bank, 17th No- vember, 1844. No. 4.—Conservancy. First and Second Memorial. To the Right Honourable the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty, and to the Right Honourable the Lords Commissioners for the Affairs of Trade. The Memorial of the Mayor, Aldermen, and Burgesses of the Borough of Liverpool, Sheweth,—That your Memorialists, as representing the town and being the owners of the Lordship of Liverpool, comprising the Port, are most materially interested in the maintenance, preservation, and improvement. of havigation of the River Mersey. : That the entrance to the River Mersey is by three principal channels, formed in the midst of numerous sand-banks and shoals, frequently shifting and increasing. _ That in other parts of the river there are dangerous banks and shoals, and that in particular extensive banks have formed opposite the entrance of sf ag threatening the most dangerous consequences. . Cc 18 REPORT—1856. That for years past the general state of the river has been most critical and alarming. That the principal causes of this state of the river are, as your Memorialists believe, the impediments offered to the flux and reflux of the tidal waters and the diminution of water space above the town, by the enclosure from the river of large tracts of land. That your Memorialists have for many years vainly endeavoured to obtain some efficient protection for their own and the public interests in the vesting of the conservancy of the river in commissioners with adequate powers, your Memorialists fearing that unless vigorous measures were adopted, the Mersey would become, like the Dee, the Lune, the Exe, and many other rivers, no longer navigable for vessels of burden. That your Memorialists, from the year 1818 to the present time, have, at a very heavy expense, caused frequent surveys and reports upon the state of the river to be made, namely, in 1818 by the late Mr. Whidbey, the con~- structor of the breakwater at Plymouth (whose Report contains a concise and clear view of the then state of the river, and of the deterioration to be anticipated from the causes before mentioned); in 1822 by the same gen- tleman in conjunction with the late Messrs. Chapman and John Rennie; in 1823 by Messrs. Telford, Nimmo, Whidbey, Chapman, Rennie, and Fowler; in 1826 by Mr. Whidbey and Messrs. George Rennie and Giles; in 1827 by Messrs. George Rennie and Giles, and afterwards by Messrs. James Walker and W. C. Mylne; in 1828 by Messrs. Telford, Stevenson, and Nimmo; in 1835 by Mr. George Rennie ; in 1836 by Commander Denham, R.N.; and in 1837 by Messrs. Mylne and George Rennie and Walker. That these Reports prove in the most unquestionable manner the absolute necessity for active and incessant superintendence, and they also incontestably prove the changeable character of the river and its ap- proaches. That in the beginning of the Session of last year a Bill was brought into the House of Commons to empower the proprietors of the Grand Junction Railway to amend their present line, by forming a new line of railway by crossing the River Mersey three to four miles below the town of Warrington, by a bridge at a place called Fidler’s Ferry. That your Memorialists, fully sensible of the importance of the proposed measure, were with great reluctance compelled to offer to it all the oppo- sition in their power, inasmuch as the proposed bridge would have been injurious to the trade and navigation on the river, and would have interfered with the flux and reflux of the tide. That this Bill was rejected in committee so far as related to the intended bridge. That your Memorialists on this occasion offered evidence as to the past and present state of the river. That from the evidence thus given, your Memorialists have extracted portions comprising part of the Reports already referred to, which they lay before your Lordships, and to which they earnestly and respectfully solicit your attention. That one statement in particular proved before the committee was as follows :— : “The present area of the River Mersey, from the Black Rock at the mouth to Woolston Weir above Warrington Bridge, is 23,062 acres, over which, at a 22-feet tide, 736,945,215 tons of water flow, and that no less than 13,440 acres of marshes have been abstracted from the tideway, equal to about 25,000,000 tons of water, calculated at the same tide. That the remaining THE RIVER MERSEY. 19 salt marshes were, about the year 1822, only 1897 acres, from which further abstractions have since been made.” That in further corroboration of your Memorialists’ representation, they lay before your Lordships the following Report of Lieutenant Lord, R.N., the Marine Surveyor of the Dock Trustees :— “ Marine Surveyor’s Office, February 1839. “My attention having been called to the fluctuations going on from time to time on the banks and shores of the Mersey and its embouchure, I beg to state that all those conversant with the navigable channels of the river are aware that frequent and sometimes very sudden changes take place in'the sand-banks and navigable waters of the same. That such fluctuations are going on continually is strongly evidenced by the Marine Surveyor’s Report in 1836, by which it appears that between the years 1828 and 1836 the - horizontal increase of Pluckington Bank was 210 yards abreast of Brunswick Basin, 123 abreast of King’s Dock, and 40 abreast of Duke’s Dock; and that between the years 1834 and 1836 it had grown up one foot at Brunswick Dock, two feet off Brunswick Basin, three feet off King’s Dock, three feet off Duke’s Dock, and one foot off Canning Dock; whilst its lower water margin yielded 50 yards during the same period. Thus threatening to be- gyme a serious obstruction to the entrance of Brunswick, King’s, and Duke’s ock. “Tt also appears from the same statements, that the Devil’s Bank and Spit had considerably elongated during the above period. _ “In a remoter region, namely, the sand-banks at the entrance of the port, such as the Great and Little Burbo, Jordan Flats, &c., the changes have been still greater, as was fully evinced in the survey carried on last summer, as compared with that of 1835. “Tn no part is this more strongly exemplified than in the Half-tide Swash- way and the New Channel. “ In the former the Old Channel has filled, leaving a dry bank at low water, and another channel has scoured itself where we had formerly a dry bank; whilst in the New Channel there has been a gradual warping and filling up for the last four years, leaving now a navigable channel of only 130 fathoms wide, with 11 feet at low water, where we formerly had a channel half a mile wide with 12 and 13 feet. ** Taylor's Bank has also considerably spread to the north-west during the above interval, and various other alterations have taken place in the contour and altitude of the banks. ; “In conclusion, I would state it to be my conviction that the encroachment on the bed of the river, by the reclaiming of land, &c. at its upper part, cannot _be too strongly deprecated, as it must evidently diminish the backwater, on the scouring effects of which the very vitality of the entrances to the port depends, besides altering and diverting the stream of the river into new and often injurious channels. ee ‘“T have the honour, &c., “W.Lorp.” | That your Memorialists, in the language of their late lamented representa- tive the Right Honourable William Huskisson, “ feel convinced, from facts and personal observation, that if the system of encroachment and nuisance which has prevailed for many years in the Mersey is not effectually checked, 80 as to give full scope for the natural flux and reflux of the tidal waters, the Port of Liverpool will, in the course of no very long time, be as much ‘choked up as those of Chester and Lancaster now are.” ~ Your Memorialists therefore, in conclusion, earnestly urge on the attention c2 20 REPORT—1856. of your Lordships the necessity for immediate measures for the future pro- tection of the navigation of the River Mersey, an object of increasing and anxious interest to your Memorialists, and one in which the eountry at large is deeply concerned. And your Memorialists will ever pray, &c. Liverpool, April 1839. Second Memorial, September 1839. To the Honourable the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty, and to the Right Honourable the Lords Commissioners for the Affairs of Trade. The Memorial of the Mayor, Aldermen, and Burgesses of the Borough of Liverpool, Sheweth,—That your Memorialists presented in May last, through the members of the borough, a Memorial to your Lordships, setting forth the dan- gerous state of the River Mersey, from the numerous and shifting banks and shoals, the causes for this state, the endeavours hitherto ineffectually made to obtain efficient protection, the necessity for incessant superintendence, the immense area already abstracted from the tideway, and other grounds, as inducements for the interference of your Lordships, in order to the establish- ment of a Commission of Conservancy ; which Memorial was accompanied by extracts of evidence taken before a Committee of the House of Commons in the session of 1838, in the Grand Junction Railway Bill, as to the past and present state of the river. That your Memorialists are anxious to receive the opinion of your Lord- ships upon the prayer of their Memorial, and (venturing to assume that a Bill to be brought into Parliament in the ensuing session will be directed or sanctioned by your Lordships) more particularly as to the preliminary ques- tion, whether such Bill ought to be public or private, inasmuch as in case the latter be deemed by your Lordships to be preferable, the necessary notices must be forthwith given, and other parliamentary proceedings be taken in conformity to the standing orders; and, as whatever course of proceeding your Lordships may recommend, immediate meetings with parties concerned, proprietors along the banks of the river, ought to be held, in order as much as possible to remove misunderstanding and consequent hostility on their arts. ‘ That your Memorialists would respectfully urge on your Lordships’ con- sideration, that the plan of a public bill would be the preferable course ; for even the notice of a private bill, and the deposit of maps showing a line of causeway along, or, as many would suppose, over estates on the banks of the Mersey, creates such alarm in the minds of the proprietors interested, as to make it exceedingly difficult and almost impossible afterwards to explain that the proposed measure is one for the public good, and for the benefit rather than to the injury of individuals. That your Memorialists have, through their officers, lately had the advan- tage of conferences with Mr. Wilkin, one of the officers of the Woods and Forests, and with Mr. Wilkin, junior, both lately dispatched by that Board to Liverpool, at the instance of your Lordships, to take preliminary steps on the subject of the Conservancy; and your Memorialists believe that these gentlemen, who have given considerable attention to the subject, and have taken great interest therein, concur in opinion with your Memorialists and their officers, that a public bill is the proper measure to be recommended, but that, however that point may be determined, another session ought not THE RIVER MERSEY. 91 to pass over without a bill, public or private, being brought into Par- liament. Your Memorialists therefore pray the immediate consideration and direc- tion of your Lordships on the matters submitted. (Copy-) No. 5.—Letter from H. M. Denham, R.N., to the Corporation of Liverpool, 27th September, 1836. Marine Surveyor’s Office, Liverpool, Sept. 27, 1836. Srr,—Pursuant to a request to the following effect,—-“‘ That I would furnish a plan of that part of the river opposite the property of Mr. Lace and others, and a report and statement of the variation in Pluckington Bank and the adjacent parts,’—I took every opportunity afforded by the tides and weather to produce the results set forth in this report and the ac- companying plans, which will evidence how necessarily the question involved an actual re-survey of the whole region between the Rock Lighthouse and where the river ceases to be navigable at low water, viz. Garston and Eastham ; for on no less datum than the most recent tests as to the causes and effects of the river’s deflection could I presume to give an opinion, which, on the one hand, might involve capital already embarked in projections, or, on the other, incite the sanction of its conservators as respects those projec- tions. I can, however, now assert, that so distant is the primary cause and impetus of the river’s deflection(on its eastern margin) from those projections between Knott’s Hole or Dingle Point and the southern extremity of the Dock Estate, as to entirely absolve the works of Messrs. Lace and others from any ill effects. Provided, that it be a sine gud non such jetties shall be subject to a boundary-line on the strand, laterally with the low-water margin as deline- ated on the Plan, such line to constitute the face of all projections, and _ (until connected with the shelving rocks at Dingle Point) to have 100 yards of face wall always at right angles to the southward of the southernmost offset. In this stipulation it will appear that I admit the deflecting effect of any offsets upon the ebb stream, although north of Dingle Point. So Ido; but it is so slight, in comparison with the position and continuous diversion of that point, that if we abstain from interrupting the downset of the recover- ing water-level (feeble as it is) after rounding Dingle Point, by direct off- sets, then we shall direct that feeble portion of stream fairly and beneficially down the face of the docks. Thus much, Sir, applies to the question of Mr. Lace’s projection, or any others in the limits quoted. I now beg to report on the nature of Pluckington and Devil’s Banks ; to elucidate which, I submit a plan of the features of the river between the Rock Lighthouse and Garston, upon four inches to the mile, whereon the course and velocity of the flood and ebb stream are portrayed, the former in red and the latter in blue ink, showing that Pluckington owes nothing to the flood-tide deposit, but that on the course of the eastern column of the ebb does that deposit depend, and that course depends on Dingle Point; for by practical tests on each half-hour of ebb from high to low water, we _ perceive its inclination to follow the trend of shore until within 100 yards of Dingle Point, which becomes so decidedly the point of deflection, as to hurry it into the deep-water column with such impetus as to blend with it, and divert the whole obliquely towards Birkenhead, whereby the tidal stream 22 REPORT—1856. off the southern portion of docks, especially King’s, Queen’s, and Brunswick “Docks, becomes so weakened as to permit the sand held in solution to deposit thereat, besides being too weak to bear away the silt driven forth from the several dock sluices. The first effect of this diversion manifests itself in the formation of a shelf of sand varying from three to ten feet under water, that springs from abreast of the rocks under Mr. Lawrence’s wall one-third of a mile southward of the Potteries, trending obliquely towards Birkenhead until abreast of the southern extremity of the Dock Estate, where it forms an elbow one-third of a mile towards the centre of the river, and then trends to St. George’s Dock. This shelf, therefore, narrows the river capacity at low water to nearly one-half what it appears to be at Rock Ferry and Brunswick Dock, and then the visible Pluckington springing obliquely from the southern extremity of the Dock Estate, and forming an entrance off Brunswick off-tide entrance at an offset of 270 yards into the river, whence it trends into St. George’s Dock, lateral to and within thirty yards of the ‘margin of the shelf. This bank outlays King’s Dock Basin also 270 yards, varying from six feet to one foot in height above low-water level. Its highest part is off Duke’s Dock, where it outlays fifty yards less, but drives up ten feet; off Canning Dock it outlays above 120 yards, and drives up to six feet four inches, then gradually narrows at an elevation of two feet, until uniting with the base of George’s Pier-head. Taking the progress of this bank since 1828, whieh is marked by a green shade on Plan, we have a horizontal increase of 210 yards abreast of Bruns- wick Basin, abreast of King’s Dock 123 yards, and abreast of Duke’s Dock only 40 yards. Its respective elevations I cannot quote between those dates, but since 1834, I find it grown up one foot off Brunswick Dock, two feet off Brunswick Basin, three feet off King’s Dock, three feet off Duke’s Dock, and one foot off Canning Dock, during which its low-water margin has yielded fifty yards directly off Brunswick Basin. Simultaneous with this two years’ fluctuation, I find the Devil’s Bank to have warped 143 yards towards the eastern shore, lowered in altitude four feet, but elongated towards Pluckington Shelf 250 yards, so that the spit of Devil’s Bank and Pluckington Shelf are within a quarter of a mile of uniting with each other,— an event to be feared, seeing that the Devil’s Spit has elongated two-thirds of a mile in eight years, but which should be averted with all anxiety ; for on the space between them being shoaled up to a bar of six feet instead of fifteen, the Garston branch of the Mersey will scour its way through the Swatchway just above Otterspool, dividing the Devil’s Bank from Eastham Sands, and join the main column of ebb stream down the Cheshire side of the river. I therefore earnestly propose, that, with reference to the curvi- lineal boundary set forth for the future projections between the Dock Estate and Dingle Point, a river-wall should be extended in connexion from forty yards within the low-water edge of the Knott’s Hole rocks, scraping the edge of those rocks, and preserving a gentle concave along the low-water ‘margin of the shore. This wall would produce a most sensible effect on the first 400 yards’ advance, by presenting a cutwater edge to the down stream, instead of allowing the whole body of water to drive against the north cliffs and rocks of Dingle Point, and then jerked off with an impo- verished impetus at nearly right angles to its wonted and natural course. Its further extension might be subject of convenience of funds, &c., under- standing that as it progressed south-eastward, more decided guidance and impetus on the ebb stream would ‘be afforded, the destructive undermining of the cliffs and consequent dissemination thereof on the banks obviated, THE RIVER MERSEY. 93 aQq much valuable frontage redeemed; for, supposing it carried up to Otterspool, an area of 616 acres would be produced; and if up to Garston, 1590 acres. The filling up would not concern our tidal object; on the contrary, the circulation of water within would avoid the displacement of 2,702,018 cubic yards of tidal water in first enclosure to Otterspool, and 72,000,000 in the whole enclosure. The contemplated enclosure between the Dock Estate and Dingle Point will embrace 346 acres area, and 11,024,444 cubic yards of water, for the total of which displacement I should not be tenacious of per- mitting of a close wall and filling up the strand within it, notwithstanding the assumed obvious advantage to property. I will conclude this Report, Sir, by begging it may go hand in hand with the local and general Plans herewith submitted for elucidation to the mind’s eye of those gentlemen concerned in the conservation of the Mersey and Dock approaches. Of the latter it need only be said, that, whilst placing dock sills between four and nine feet of low-water level, a bank should be contemplated with much jealousy that not only precludes taking up early anchorage near the Southern Docks, but that threatens to elevate itself above the level of those sills, except in the guttering course of the gate sluices. I ought to add, that we need not wait the connexion of a boundary wall from the Docks to Dingle Point before striking out the ewfwater wall south- ward, but act independently and effectively by Dingle Point, by first project- ing on the rocks 100 yards in a south-west direction, and then vigorously working towards Otterspool. I have the honour to be, Sir, Your obedient Servant, H. M. Denna, R.N., Marine Surveyor to the Dock Trustees To the Worshipful the Mayor of Liverpool. No. 6.—Statement of the Town Clerk as to the Rights of the Mayor, Aldermen, and Burgesses of Liverpool to the Lordship of Liverpool, com- _ prising the River Mersey up tu the Bridges and to the Strand at Liver- pool, Toxteth Park, Birkenhead, and Wallasey. 1. The title of the Corporation to the Lordship of Liverpool, comprising the River Mersey up to the Bridges. The Corporation, as purchasers from the grantees of King Charles the First, are seized in fee of the town and lordship of Liverpool, and all the customs, anchorage, and key or keel towl of the water of the Mersey, of which over the whole of the river up to the Warrington and Frodsham Bridges the Corporation are, and ever since their purchase have been, in the receipt and enjoyment. The lordship comprises the river up to the bridges. ' By the Liverpool Dock Act, 2 Geo. III. ¢. 86. s.18, the Corporation, as i “ the Trustees of the Liverpool Docks,” have the following express powers :— «‘ And be it further enacted by the authority aforesaid, that it shall and may be lawful to and for the said trustees, their agents, servants or work- men, when and as often as occasion shall require, well and sufficiently to cleanse, scour, open, deepen, widen or straighten, rake up or cut through any banks, shoals, flats, shallows, dock sluices or guts in the said harbour of Liverpool, or leading into the same from. the sea, as the same trustees, or * any twenty-five or more of them, shall think proper and necessary for the 94 REPORF—1856. better securing, maintaining, and preserving a free, open and perfect navi- gation into and through the said harbour of Liverpool, and to dig, cut, re- move and take away any sand, gravel, rocks, stones, anchors, cables, timber and other things, wrecks of ships, or other vessels, or any other obstructions or impediments to the navigation leading into and being within the said harbour of Liverpool from the sea or mouth of the said harbour, and so far southwards as the liberties or lordship of the Corporation of Liverpool ex- tend, be it the ground or soil of the King’s Most Excellent Majesty or any other person or persons, bodies politic or corporate, whatsoever.” 2. The property of the Corporation in the Strand at Liverpool and part of Toxteth Park. The Corporation of Liverpool are the owners of the freehold of the whole of the strand, forming the river front of the ancient borough, such owner- ship so far as respects the docks now standing vested in them in their capacity of “the Trustees of the Liverpool Docks,” by virtue of appropria- tions under the Dock Acts. As to the small deck of the Trustees of the late Duke of Bridgewater, that property, with certain limited privileges over the strand, is leasehold for lives, with a right of perpetual renewal on payment of a small fixed fine, the Cerporation still owning the freehold in reversion. Of the title of the Corporation there is, from 1670 downwards, the strongest proofs, by grants, leases, and various other acts of ownership, as in 1828 was fully admitted by the Duchy of Lancaster, Mr. Wyndham then being the Duchy Solicitor. Upon this occasion exiracts from the Corporation Records, with three explanatory maps, were laid before the Duchy. Of the strand in Toxteth Park, so far as the Liverpool Docks extend into that township or extra-parochial place, the Corporation, principally in their capacity of “the Trustees of the Liverpool Docks,” are also the owners of the freehold by purchases from Lord Sefton and others under the Dock Acts. The docks of the trustees and the river-walls were all made under acts of Parliament. 3. The property of the Corporation in Birkenhead and Wallasey. The Corporation by purchases are entitled to their land at Birkenhead and Wallasey in fee, with the rights of the lords of the manors to the shore of the Mersey. The only erections (called by Mr. Eyes encroachments) made since the purchases of the Corporation are parts of the public road, viz. where that road crosses Gill Brook, and where it crosses Bridge End, and one other erection, the unauthorized act of a tenant. All the other erections on the shore were made by prior owners. (Copy) No. 7.—Letter from Lieut. Wm. Lord to the Chairman of the Conservancy Committee. Marine Surveyor’s Office, Liverpool, March 23rd, 1840. Sir,—Referring to those points to which it is most desirable the attention of the Conservative Commissioners of the River Mersey should be primarily directed in the event of conservative powers being obtained from Parlia- ment, I would premise, that the existence and maintenance of the sea chan- nels leading to the port, vitally depend on the preservation of the back- water which the Mersey and its tributary streams afford; that this body of —_- THE RIVER MERSEY. 25 water is liable to daily diminution by various encroachments, and, if not protected, will be materially lessened, the effect of which would undoubtedly be, the sanding and filling up of the sea channels, leading ultimately to the ruin of the port. The first object therefore worthy the attention of the conservators, would, in my opinion, be the preservation of the backwater as it at present exists, and to take care that for the future it was not trenched on or diminished. To effect this object, it would, I think, be desirable that the limits of the high-water margin of the river should be accurately marked and defined, and that no subsequent encroachment should be allowed on the bed of the river, either in the shape of reclaiming land from its banks, or by allow- ing any projections into the stream of the river without the sanction of the Commissioners. It is a well-known fact, that considerable encroachments have in former times been made on the bed of the Mersey by the reclaiming of land in the upper part of the river, and such operations cannot, in my opinion, be too strongly deprecated ; and I may here add, that it is to this very cause, viz. the enclosure of land in its upper part, that the filling up of the channels in the estuary of the Dee is very generally attributed. Having defined the high-water limits, it would, I think, be very desirable that the edges of the banks (which in the upper part of the river are com- posed of an earthy sward) should be protected by a facing of stone or other suitable material; the destructive fretting away and undermining of their margins and consequent dissemination thereof on the banks in the river, and its embouchure, would thus be obviated. Having thus secured and rendered permanent a scouring force of water equal to that we now possess, and which there is every reason to believe is capable of maintaining the sea-approaches of the port in as effective a state as they now exist, it would only remain to carefully and vigilantly watch the changes that might arise from time to time in the sand-banks in the river and its approaches, and should circumstances render it necessary, adopt. such timely remedial measures as the urgency of the case or the operations of nature might suggest. I may here remark, that the dredging operations which were so successfully carried on during a period of ten months last year in the Victoria Channel, and by means of which a most valuable chan- nel was opened to the port, depended for their success entirely on the column of water running out of the Mersey on the ebb tide, and a minute attention to the changes which were naturally taking place in that region; and should any future fluctuations take place in that or other quarters, it may again become requisite to adopt artificial measures to improve or preserve the approaches to the port. The natural formation of the River Mersey is, I think, admirably adapted for the purpose of scouring and keeping open the sea channels, provided that formation is not altered and distorted by encroachments on its banks. The upper part of the river, between the Dingle Point and Weston Point, forms as it were an immense inland lake of eleven miles long by two and a half broad, the latter being the average width between Eastham and Garston, ~and Dungeon Point and the Cheshire shore. At the Dingle Point the river contracts, and between the Cheshire shore and Liverpool, from the south to the north end of the docks, it constitutes a narrow gorge of only half a mile width and considerable depth, through which the calculated waters of the upper lake are disgorged with a velocity of as much as seven miles per hour on the ebb tide; and though it is true that this impetus is materially dimi- nished by the time it reaches the sea at the outer bars of the shallows, still 26 REPORT—1856. if we can preserve the same column of water and strength of current which we now possess, I see no reason to apprehend the outer approaches of the port sanding or filling up. The scarping, or removal of rocks, in the river should not, I think, be undertaken without due consideration of the effects likely to be produced by so doing, and should, in my opinion, be avoided as much as possible. In conclusion, I would beg to remark, that I think the new dock proposed to be formed to the westward of the Salthouse Dock, and the carrying out of the river-wall in that quarter, so as to form a continuous line with the other docks, will be a great and decided improvement to the navigation of the river. : I am, Sir, your obedient Servant, (Signed) Ws. Lorp, Marine Surveyor to the Port. To the Chairman of the Conservancy Committee. (Copy-) No. 8.—Letter from Lieut. Wm. Lord to R. Radcliffe, Esq. ‘ Marine Surveyor’s Office, April 3, 1840. Dear Srr,—Since I last wrote to you on the Conservancy affairs, it has occurred to me that two or three piers judiciously run out between Garston and the Dingle Point, might produce a good effect in preventing the great offset of the tide from the Dingle Point, and conducting it along the line of the docks, by which some portion of Pluckington Bank would doubtless be got rid of. Having had some conversation with the Dock Surveyor on the subject, I may add that he fully concurs with me on this matter, which may be worthy the attention of the Conservancy Commissioners, should such be appointed. The expense of the erection of such piers would not, I apprehend, be very great. I am, dear Sir, Yours very truly, (Signed) Wo. Lorp. R. Radcliffe, Esq., Town Hall. Report upon the changes in the Sea Channels of the Mersey, as recorded by the Surveys taken and published within the last fifty years ; and which surveys have been laid before the Committee appointed to investigate and report upon the same, by the British Association for the Advancement of Science, at its meeting in Liverpool, September 1854. By Joseru Boutr. The charts of the Mersey having been usually prepared when important changes had taken place in the channels, the investigations of those changes could not be arranged by epochs of time, and therefore the periods which the charts themselves prescribe have been adopted. For the purpose of this inquiry it may be conveniently assumed that the true mouths of the river are at the outward extremities of the sea channels. The streams of tide running inland through these sea channels unite into one great stream between the north dock-works of Liverpool and New Brighton. After passing the towns of Liverpool and Birkenhead, through a narrow gorge—which in places is as much as 10 or 12 fathoms deep, at low water as, ee a a aD ee THE RIVER MERSEY. 27 of ordinary spring tides—the river rapidly widens into a very extensive reach or reservoir, sometimes called the upper estuary ; from which the tide, after sending an offshoot into the Weaver, passes into the upper reaches of the river through the smaller gorge of Runcorn-gap. After traversing a series of reaches and gorges of less and less importance, and surmounting a low weir at Howley-locks (Warrington), its further progress is finally barred by the Woolston-weir of the Mersey and Irwell navigation. This weir is about four miles above Warrington ; twenty-two miles above the Rock Point, New Brighton ; and thirty-four miles above the bar of the Victoria Channel. In the first instance, the pheenomena of the upper estuary, and those of the ter estuary or Liverpool Bay, may be most conveniently considered apart ; the results of their investigation can afterwards be combined. ' Liverpool Bay.—The earliest authentic survey of Liverpool Bay, published within the period assigned to this inquiry, is that of Captain George Thomas, R.N., which was taken in 1813, and published in May 1815. The next authentic survey is that of Captain H. M. Denham, R.N., in 1833. Both these surveys were made by order of the Admiralty, in consequence of the great anxiety and alarm experienced by the local authorities, arising from the important changes which took place in the channels prior to each of the above dates. The changes of the later period continuing,—they were in fact the precur- sors of the substitution of new outlets for the old ones,—the surveys were repeated by Captain Denham, in 1835 and 1837. North Channel—On comparing the charts of 1813 and 1838, it appears that at the former date the Northern Channel, which was previously divided into two portions, called the Crosby and the Formby Channels, maintained an even course until it had passed Crosby Point, where it separated into two outlets; one over a bar, with from one to eight feet of water, into the old Formby Channel, in which were from one and three-quarters to six fathoms ; and thence over another bar seaward with from one to eight feet of water. The other-outlet, called the South Channel, was to the southward and west- ward, and passed between the Jordan and Great Burbo Banks, having from two to six fathoms, diminishing on a seaward bar to 7 feet. In this survey Formby Bank is insulated and covered at four hours’ flood. _ Formby Bank.—In 1833, twenty years later, Formby Bank had attached itself to the main shore; and the old Formby Channel was almost land-locked, and had no communication with the Crosby Channel, except over a 6-foot bar, between Jordan and Formby Banks. The depth of water on the seaward bar of this channel had creased in places to 13 feet. . New Channel—The South Channel of Thomas's survey appears to have shifted upwards of a mile to the southward, and acquired nearly a true east and west bearing; and had a bar with 10 or 11 feet of water. It was called by Denham the New Channel. Zebra Channel.—Between the Formby Channel and the New Channel another outlet was opened, having a minimum depth of 2 feet, and called the Half-tide Swatchway, or Zebra Channel. _ Mad Wharf.—Mad Wharf, a large bank adjoining Formby Point to the northward, had elongated upwards of 2200 yards in that direction, and its area considerably enlarged. . Many changes took place in the position and magnitude of the minor banks adjoining the seaward entrance of the Northern Channel; some of which, as the “middle patch,” nearly disappeared; whilst others enlarged their area, or sprang altogether into existence. .° Vietoria Channel.—Between the survey of 1833 and those of 1835 and 98 REPORT—1856. 1837, the differences chiefly consist of the changes which accompanied the partly natural and partly artificial formation or readjustment of the new channels; they found their issue in the formation of that which is known as the Victoria Channel. West Channel.—A similar examination of the Western Channel, divided into two portions called the Rock and the Horse Channels, will show the following changes. Rock Channel.—In the above-named period of twenty years the banks north of the Rock Channel were enlarged and consolidated ; the Brazil Bank and Burbo Sand were united to the Great Burbo Bank, and the patch, which at the earlier date divided the Rock Channel at its junction with the river into two portions, was itself divided, and one piece added to Burbo Sand, the other to the main shore. At the western extremity of the Rock Channel, near its junction with the Horse Channel, its width has been contracted about 400 yards ; the accretions are partially on Dove Spit, but chiefly on the western point of Great Burbo, now called the North Spit. At the bar of the Rock Channel, Thomas gives soundings of one-third fathom (or 2 feet) seaward, and of one and two-third fathom (or 10 feet) on the Liverpool side. In 1833 Denham gives 2 feet on the bar, and 3 feet on the Liverpool side, showing a diminution of 7 feet in the latter. Denham’s soundings are unaltered in 1837. Hoylake.—In 1689, the date of Captain Collins's survey, the big ships put out part of their lading in Hoylake, that they might sail over the flats into Liverpool ; at that time the depth of water in the lake ranged from two and a half fathoms to seven fathoms, and William III. was able to embark his army for Ireland. 124 years afterwards, Thomas records the range as reduced from one fathom to four fathoms; and twenty years later it appears upon Denham’s first chart as closed by a bar, the pools on either side of the bar having been reduced in width to about one-half of that of the lake in 1813. Hoylake joined the Western Channel at the junction of the Horse and Rock Channels. Horse Channel.—Whilst these changes have taken place, the direction of the Horse Channel has been slightly varied by additions to the north-eastern extremity of East Hoyle Bank. Dock Extensions. 1803 to 1836.—According to information obligingly furnished by Mr. J.B. Hartley, one of the engineers to the Committee of the Liverpool Docks, the works constructed between 1803 and 1836 comprised the Prince’s Dock and Basin; the Waterloo, Victoria, and Trafalgar Docks ; the Clarence Dock; the Clarence Graving Dock and Clarence Half-tide Dock, and the Salisbury Dock, northwardly ; the widening of the George's and King’s Piers, and the construction of the Manchester Basin, Canning Half-tide Dock, and Albert Dock, centrally ; and the widening of the Queen’s Pier and the construction of the Eagle Basin and river craft dock, the Union, Coburg, and Brunswick Docks, the Brunswick Graving Docks, the Brunswick Half-tide Dock, and the Dockyard, southwardly ; and the space abstracted from the river by these works comprised an area of about 156 acres. These works have been almost entirely constructed since 1813. Meteorological Phenomena.—There are no reliable meteorological obser- vations of the period 1813 to 1837. The following notices of storms of wind and rain are compiled from the annals appended to Gore’s Directory of Liverpool :— 1802.—A dreadful hurricane; considerable damage done by sea and land ; THE RIVER MERSEY. 29 the tide rose 6 feet higher than the calculation in the time-table. Sefton Church lost about 5 feet of its spire. January 21. There appears to be a lapse in this portion of the chronicle, as the next record is in _ 1818.—A continuance of stormy and boisterous weather during February and March. 1821.—A most dreadful storm experienced in the town. November 30. 1822.—The pilot-boat No. 4 lost on Salisbury Bank (in the Dee estuary), in a dreadful storm. December 5. 1823.—A very violent hurricane ; several chimneys blown down ; several vessels blown on shore in Bootle Bay and other parts of the river. Decem- ber 3rd. More serious accidents happened from this storm than from any other since the memorable one in the year 1560. 1824.—The equinoctial gales set in with such violence that many of the steam-boats from the opposite ferries, which usually cross in six or seven minutes, were more than two hours on their passage. March 4. A dreadful storm; much damage done in the Prince’s Dock by the vessels driving against each other. October 26. 1829.—A dreadful storm of thunder and lightning and rain; continue from 3 pm.to8pm. July 24. A very violent storm of wind and rain, which flooded Whitechapel and the neighbourhood (the site of the old pool) to a much greater extent than had been experienced for many years. The sewer in the Old Dock burst, and carried several yards of wall into the dock. August. 1830.— Alarming thunder-storm, with heavy rain; much damage in White- chapel, &c.; many houses in the higher parts of the town flooded. July 30. 1831.—Liverpool visited with one of the most tremendous falls of rain recorded in its annals. The consequences were very disastrous. 1832.—Tremendous storm of wind; several vessels were wrecked, and many lives lost. October 8. 1833.—Dreadful storm of wind and rain for two days, which produced great mischief on shore, and a very melancholy loss of life at sea. November 29. A storm more severe than that of November 29th, much more property being destroyed. The tide rose fromthe proper height of 17 feet 5 inches to 26 feet; the piers and wharves were overflowed, and much damage was done to the public works, north and south. December 31. 1834.—Violent gale on the night of Sunday, December 7. 1835.—A very violent storm, in which many vessels were driven on shore and wrecked. February 22. 1836.—The ‘John Welsh,’ Captain Woodhouse, from Savanilla, lost in a hurricane, on West Hoyle, July 29. During a severe gale, the ‘Heyes,’ for Barbadoes, and the ‘Febo,’ for Palermo, were lost; and the ‘Sandbach’ and several other vessels got on shore; several pilots were taken to sea. December 22nd and 23rd. Since 1837 the surveys of Liverpool Bay have been conducted by Lieu- tenant Lord, R.N., lately marine surveyor to the Dock Committee; they were published in the years 1840, 1846, 1849, 1852, 1853, and 1854. Northern Channel. 1840.—On comparing the survey of 1840 with that of its immediate predecessor of 1837, it will be seen that the Northern Channel had undergone important changes. They were as follows :— Crosby Channel.—The length and direction of that portion of the Crosby Channel which lies between the Rock Lighthouse and the Crosby Light- vessel had been very slightly altered ; and its area had remained very much 30 » REPORT—1856. the same as in 1837; but the average depth had been reduced from 31 feet to 30 feet. Between the Crosby and Formby Light-vessels the direction of the channel had undergone considerable alteration, the Formby vessel, in 1840, having been moved nearly 600 yards westward ; the area and depth increased, the former from 15,600 yards to 17,500 yards, and the latter from 26} feet to 27 feet. The average of the whole channel from the Rock Lighthouse to Formby Light-vessel being an area slightly increased, and a depth sta- tionar Victoria Channel.—The change in the direction of this channel had ice very great; the Bell Buoy, which indicates its entrance from the sea, having been moved, in 1840, nearly 2000 yards to the north of its position in 1837. The depth of water on the bar had been reduced from 12 feet and 13 feet to 10 feet and 11 feet. Zebra Channel.—This channel had been advanced to the westward of its former position, and had increased its minimum depth from 2 feet to 3 feet on the fairway track. Formby Bank.—This bank had been slightly moved to the eastward, and considerably elongated to the northward, the elevation of its surface much more varied, some portions having been considerably higher and others lower than they were in 1837; the elongated portion may be specially noted as having been entirely “ wash.” On the whole, however, the volume of the bank appears to have been diminished nearly one-third ; the cubic contents of the bank, in 1837, having been nearly 10,000,000 yards, and in 1840 rather more than 6,500,000 yards. Mad Wharf:—In this bank there had been little change. Great Burbo.—The area of this bank had been enlarged, and its volume increased from about 58,500,000 yards to about 62,000,000 yards. Western Channel——The eastern portion of this channel, called the Rock Channel, had been reduced in length about 500 yards, and in average depth 1 foot; its area had been reduced about 580 yards, making the average loss on the three years equal to 6 per cent. per annum. The depth of water on the bar reduced from 2 feet to 1 foot; and the first sounding on the Liverpool side of the bar from 3 fect to 2 feet. The sailing direction of the Horse*Channel remained unaltered ; but the North-west Light-vessel at the seaward entrance of the channel had been removed in 1840 about 250 yards north of its position in 1837. East Hoyle—The bar in Hoylake, forming part of this bank, had in- creased in area, and grown up to 2 feet and 3 feet above low-water level ; ‘but, notwithstanding this accession, the area and altitude of this bank had been diminished; and its volume reduced from nearly 81,250,000 yards to rather more than 73,500,000 yards. Dock Extension—No works of importance were constructed during the period under investigation. Meteorological Phenomena.—In the continued absence of recorded sci- entific observations, reference is again made to the precarious information in ‘ Gore’s Annals,’ from which the following notices are compiled :— 1838.—The British ship ‘ Athabaska,’ bound to Quebec, totally lost on West Hoyle during a gale; all on board perished. April 17. 1839.—A terrific and most destructive hurricane visited Liverpool on the evening of January 6, and continued with little intermission till the following afternoon. The destruction of life and property was very great; and there was scarcely a part of the town in which some fatal accident did not occur. The loss of life amongst the shipping was awful. The North-west Lightship THE RIVER MERSEY. 3I was driven from her moorings and brought into port. Two New York packets, outward bound, were lost apes the North Bank (part of the Great Burbo, in the Rock Channel). The ‘ Brighton,’ from Bewsiey was wrecked near the Middle Patch Buoy, in the same channel. The ‘ Harvest Home,’ from St. Thomas, was lost on Mad Wharf. Northern Channel. 1846.—Between the years 1840 and 1846 consider- able changes had occurred, though, on the whole, less remarkable than those which took place between the years 1837 and 1840. Crosby Channel.—That portion between the Rock Lighthouse and the Crosby Light-vessel had not undergone much change ; its direction had been altered by removing the light-vessel nearly 200 yards to the eastward; the average depth had remained nearly stationary at 30 feet. The average area had slightly increased from 18,000 yards in 1840 to 18,840 yards in 1846. That portion between the light-vessels had undergone greater change. Its length had been increased about 400 yards, the average depth reduced to 26 feet; the average area increased about 1000 yards. Notwithstanding the change in the position of the Crosby Light-vessel above-mentioned, and the removal of the Formby Light-vessel nearly 400 yards to the northward, the direction of the channel in 1846 was parallel to its direction in 1840. The average of the whole channel from the Rock Lighthouse to Formby Light-vessel is a depth diminished from 29 feet to 284 feet, and an area in- creased nearly 700 yards. Victoria Channel_—The direction of this channel had been altered by the change in the position of the Formby Light-vessel above-mentioned, and by removing the Bell Buoy about 500 yards westward. The average depth of water on the bar had slightly increased, the various soundings having been 10 feet, 11 feet, and 12 feet. Zebra Channel.—The minimum depth on the fairway track through this chanrel had been increased from 3 feet to 6 feet. Formby Bank.—The area of this bank had been slightly enlarged, and the elevation very considerably increased, the volume having been nearly 13,000,000 yards in 1846, against rather more than 6,500,000 yards in 1840. The position had been nearly stationary ; there had been a slight elongation northwards and a slight movement eastwards. Mad Wharf.—This bank had sustained considerable loss of area by abrasion on the north-western margin ; but this loss had been partially com- pensated by increase of elevation, the change in which had been very great. The volume in 1846 had been nearly 5,750,000 yards, against 6,500,000 yards in 1840. Great Burbo.—The area of this bank appears to have been unaltered, taken as a whole, though there had been considerable local changes. The elevation had been a good deal reduced, and, consequently, the volume ; the difference is represented by 59,750,000 yards in 1846, instead of 62,000,000 yards in 1840. Western Channel.—The eastern portion, or Rock Channel, had recovered 300 yards of its length in 1837; the average depth had been stationary, and the average area slightly increased. The soundings at the bar had been un- altered. In the Horse Channel East Hoyle Bank had advanced towards the _ north-east, and the North-west Light-vessel had been moored about 300 yards to the westward. East Hoyle.—In area this bank had remained pretty stationary, but the loss in elevation had reduced the volume from upwards of 73 — yards to under 72,000,000 yards. 32 REPORT—1856. Liverpooi Dock Extension—These dock-works comprehended the Nelson, Bramley-Moore, and Wellington Docks; the Wellington Half-tide Dock, the Sandon Dock, the Sandon Graving Dock, and the Sandon Basin ; altogether a tidal area of about 117 acres. Meteorological Phenomena.—From observations recorded in the War- rington Museum and Library, for the use of which the Committee is indebted to Mr. Glazebrook Rylands of that town, it appears that the fall of rain in 1844 (the earliest year perfectly recorded) was 23°73 inches; in 1845, 30°12 inches ; and in 1846, the year of the survey, 30°29 inches. In ‘Gore’s Annals’ the following facts are noted :— 1841.—Terrifiec thunder-storm. The spires of the churches of St. Michael’s and St. Martin’s-in-the-Pields struck. August 24. 1843.—A great storm during the night of January 13. Houses and buildings were unroofed. The damage done to the shipping in the river and outside the harbour was very great, and many lives were lost. 1844..—The dock receipts for the last week were much greater than were ever received in any one week, and considerably more than double the receipts of the corresponding week of last year. The long prevalence of easterly winds in some measure contributed to produce so large an item. June 13. Northern Channel. 1849.—The survey of 1849 does not exhibit any marked changes beyond the consolidation of some of the outlying banks near the junction of the Victoria and Zebra Channels; as, for example, that of the Taylor's Bank and Jordan Flats. It appears to have been prepared to show an alteration in the fairway track through the Victoria Channel, in consequence of a shift westward of Little Burbo Bank. The positions of the Bell Buoy and of the Formby and Crosby Light-vessels remained unaltered. The average depth of water on the Victoria Bar had been slightly re- duced. Dock Extension.—The Huskisson Dock, the most northernly of the Liverpool Docks, and the Birkenhead Docks, had made considerable progress since the survey of 1846. Meteorological Phenomena.—The Warrington tables record the rain-fall during the interval between the two surveys, as follows :—In 1346, 30°29 inches; in 1847, 36°71 inches; in 1848, 33°75 inches; and in 1849, 33°98 inches. In Swineshaw Brook, a feeder of the Tame, which is a branch of the Mersey, the rain-fall recorded by Messrs. Peter Clark, F.R.A.S., and J. F. Bateman, F.G.S., Mem. Inst. C.E. (Memoirs of the Literary and Philoso- phical Society of Manchester, page 17, vol. ix. second series), was as follows :—1845, 59°8 inches, “ possibly registered too high; in other places the fall just an average;” 1846, 42°6 inches, “and this year was consider- ably below the average;” 1847, 49°35 inches, “this year was about the average, in some places above.” Survey, 1852.—The chart of 1852 shows that considerable and important changes had taken place since the survey of 1846, with which that of 1849 may be considered in the main identical. The re-survey of the bay at the latter period, as before observed, seems to have been confined to the imme- diate vicinity of the Victoria Channel. The following comparison, therefore, is instituted between the surveys of 1846 and 1852, a period of six years. Northern Channel— Crosby Channel.—The principal changes which had taken place in that portion of the Crosby Chanuel between the Rock Light- house and the Crosby Light-vessel, were its elongation, and the consequent — = THE RIVER MERSEY. 33 ‘removal of the Light-vessel about 2000 yards north-west wardly of its position in 1846; the diminution of its average depth from 30 feet to 29 feet; and the diminution of its average area from 18,840 yards to 17,500 yards. The direction of this portion of the channel had been slightly altered, as indicated by the change in the position of the Light-vessel. _In that portion of this channel between the two Light-vessels, the changes had consisted of the removal of the Formby Light-vessel about 750 yards north-westwardly ; an increase of the average depth from 26 feet, in 1846, to 28 feet in 1852; and a diminution of the average area from 18,600 yards, in 1845, to 16,450 yards in 1852. I In its whole length, the Crosby Channel during this period had been elongated about 500 yards; its average area diminished from 18,443 yards to 17,126 yards; and its average depth nearly stationary, but slightly increased. The change in the position of the Crosby Light-vessel appears to have been occasioned by the growth of a large elbow upon Great Burbo. The Formby vessel appears to have been moved partly for the same reason, and partly from a change in the position of Little Burbo, on the northern side of the Victoria Channel. Victoria Channel.—The position of this channel had again undergone very great change, the Bell Buoy having been removed about 1000 yards to the southward, or nearly midway between its positions in 1840 and 1837. The average depth of water on the bar had been very much the same in 1852 as in 1849, that is, rather less than in 1846. Zebra Channel_—The minimum depth of water in this channel had increased from 6 feet, in 1846, to 7 feet in 1852; in other respects it had remained without material alteration. Formby Bank.—This bank had been enlarged by the accession of the Jordan Bank, and by its own increased elevation: in 1846 the volume of Formby Bank was nearly 13,000,000 yards; and that of Jordan Bank 1,500,000 yards, making a total of 14,500,000 yards; in 1852 these quantities were respectively 11,000,000 yards and 4,750,000 yards, oratotal of 15,750,000 yards. Its position had been stationary. Mad Wharf.—This bank had sustained a slight loss of elevation; but this had been compensated in volume by an extension westward, the entire con- tents having been nearly 6,500,000 yards in 1852, against nearly 5,750,000 yards in 1846, the former quantity being very nearly identical with that of the same bank in 1840. Taylor Bank.—Taylor Bank and Jordan Flats, the former of which in 1833 had no existence, and the latter at that date of very minor importance, - had not only united in 1849, but in 1852 had largely increased in volume ; and in the same period had moved into close proximity with the united Formby and Jordan Banks. During the period since 1833, Little Burbo, the Middle, the West Middle, and other outlying banks had either been depressed below low-water level, or had disappeared altogether. Great Burbo.—-This bank had undergone material alterations since 1846, one of which was the extraordinary growth of the north-east angle in Crosby Channel before-mentioned; other important changes of outline may be _ noticed on inspection of the charts; perhaps the most remarkable alteration is the increase of bulk, arising partially from enlarged area, but principally _ from increased elevation ; and it is to be observed that this additional eleva- tion is generally diffused over the whole bank. In 1846 the volume of this bank had been calculated to be about 59,750,000 yards; in 1852 it had in- creased to 69,500,000 yards. Western Channel.—In 1852 the Rock Channel had again undergone a 1856. D 84 REPORT—1856. slight elongation; the average depth had been reduced to 13 feet instead of 14 feet, as in 1846; but the average area had been nearly stationary. The entrance from the Horse Channel had been slightly contracted. The sailing direction for the Horse Channel had been altered a quarter of a point, in consequence of a movement of East Hoyle Bank towards the north- east. East Hoyle.—This bank had also acquired a considerable increase of bulk, arising from additional elevation. Its volume in 1846 had been nearly 72,000,000 yards, in 1852 about 84,500,000 yards, Dock Extension.—Since 1846 the Huskisson Dock, Liverpool, had been completed, and the north wall so far advanced as practically to exclude the » tidal water; by these combined works about 355 acres have been abstracted from the river. In the same period the works at Birkenhead had made great progress; and the stank or dam across the Great Float, and the walls of the north and south reserves constructed; by these an additional area of 150 acres had been taken from the tidal area of the river,—making a total abstraction of upwards of 500 acres. Waste of River Margin.—On the Cheshire side of the river, between Seacombe Point and Sea Bank (Liscard), the waters of the river within eight years have encroached upon the land to an extent, estimated by Mr. Macpherson, the late surveyor to the Wallasey Board of Health, now of Edinburgh, at 11,350,810 cubic feet; which, at an average height of 40 feet, represent 63 acres. Meteorological Phenomena.—From the Warrington tables, it appears that the rain-fall, between 1846 and 1852, was as follows :— 1846=30°29 inches. 1850=27°79 inches. 1847=36°71 __—i,, 1851=31°48 a, 1848=33°75 4, 1852=41°46 =, 1849=33°98__,, In ‘Gore’s Annals’ the following only are recorded :— 1846.—Dreadful storm in the town and neighbourhood, great damage done. November 20. 1850.—Ship ‘ Providence,’ bound for Africa, lost in the channel during a severe gale of wind. October 7. Survey, 1853.—This survey appears to have been confined to the imme- diate vicinity of the Victoria Channel, to show the alterations in the fairway track, occasioned by changes intermediate between the surveys of 1852 and 1854. Survey, 1854.—Northern Channel.—The survey of 1854, like those of 1849 and 1853, appears to have been very partial, and has been confined to the vicinities of the Victoria Channel and of the Rock Channel; the leading line through the former had become more tortuous, though the posi- tion of the Bell Buoy and the Formby Light-vessel had been unaltered. The depths of water on the bar had slightly increased, the soundings being 11 feet, 12 feet, and 13 feet. The average area and average depth of the Crosby and Formby Channels had not undergone any important change. Zebra Channel.—The direction of the Zebra Channel had been slightly altered, having acquired a more westwardly bearing, and the average depth of water considerably reduced ; the minimum sounding was 6 feet in 1854, against 7 feet in 1852. New Channel.—A new swatchway, now known as the Queen’s Channel, THE RIVER MERSEY. 35 had been opened through the shoals, intermediate between the Zebra and Victoria Channels, having a minimum depth of 9 feet. The Banks.—No material change had taken place in any of the banks, except that Little Burbo had been sunk below low-water level, with sound- ings of from 2 feet to 5 feet, and that the bulk of Taylor’s Bank and Jordan Flats had been slightly reduced. Western Channel.—The eastern portion of the Rock Channel had been a good deal contracted, principally by enlargement of the foreshore at New Brighton. The average area in 1854 had been reduced 200 yards, or about four percent. perannum. The average depth had remained pretty stationary. Meteorological Phenomena.—From the Warrington tables, it appears that the rain-fall at Warrington had been— In 1852=41°46 inches. 1853=28:25_ ,, 1854=927°18 ,, From the tables printed with Mr. Osler’s paper “On the Self-registering Anemometer and Rain-Gauge in the Liverpool Observatory,” published in the Reports of the Association for 1855, p. 128, it appears that the rain-fall at Liverpool had been— In 1852=31°53 inches. 1853=2242 ,, 1853=2211 ,, It will be observed that there is a very great difference between the records for Liverpool and Warrington, the proportionate difference for each year being very similar; and it is to be noted that it is the fall in the up- country which is most likely to produce changes in the channels of the river, through the agency of freshes. The Liverpool tables for the first time furnish definite information upon the phenomena of wind. From them it appears that the point out of the whole sixteen from which the wind blows for the greatest number of days throughout the year is S.S.E., and therefore it has been said by Mr. Osler that in Liverpool the prevailing winds are from that point. In the absence of explanation, or without very careful explanation of the tables, this state- ment is likely to convey an erroneous impression: if, instead of comparing point with point, we take the five points from N. to W. both included, we find that in 1854 the winds from this quadrant blew for as much as half the year, or for as many days as the winds from all the other points taken together. In the other years there is a preponderance of the same points, though not to the same extent. The relative hourly velocity for the winds _ from this quadrant is also greater than for those from other points. _ If reference be made to the table (p. 142, vol. 1855) which exhibits the ex- treme pressure of the wind in pounds per square foot, and the greatest horizontal motion of the air between any one hour and the next following hour, for all the gales during the four years of which observations are recorded, in which the pressure has reached 15 pounds per square foot, it will be observed that in thirteen cases in which the velocity has exceeded fifty miles per hour, four of them were from S. of W., attaining velocities respectively of 71, 70, 53, and 51 miles per hour; the remainder being from W. to N.W., having velocities varying from 51 to 56 miles per hour. It may also be observed _ that of eighteen cases in which the pressure exceeded twenty pounds on the square foot, four of them were from the §. of W., the pressure being respect- ively 42 lbs., 42 lbs., 23 lbs., and 22 lbs.; the remainder ranged from W: to _N.W., and had pressures varying from 21 Ibs. to 43 lbs. : D2 36 REPORT—1856, On reference to ‘ Gore’s Annals,’ we find in 1852 the town and neighbour- hood visited by a severe storm. December 25th. 1854.—Violent hurricane visited Liverpool Feb. 7th and 8th. On refer- ring to the last-mentioned table we find that the “ severe storm,” December 25th, 1852, was from W.S.W., the greatest velocity seventy miles per hour, and the extreme pressure 42 lbs. per square foot; and that it was repeated on the 27th of the same month, blowing from S8.W., the greatest velocity seventy-one miles, and the extreme pressure 42 lbs. We also find that the “violent hurricane,” Feb. 17th and 18th, 1854, was, on the first day, from N.W., the velocity fifty-six miles, the pressure 27 lbs.; on the 18th, from W.N.W.., the velocity also fifty-six miles, the pressure 31 lbs. The same table shows that during the years 1852 to 1854 there were several other storms, of which ‘ Gore’s Annals’ have no mention; as, for example, Feb. 26th, 1853, from N.N.W., the velocity sixty miles, the pressure 33 lbs.; and Jan. 26th, 1854, from W., the velocity fifty-three miles, the pressure 43 lbs. In estimating the influence of the wind in producing changes in the sea channels, it must be recollected that Liverpool Bay is peculiarly exposed to winds ranging from W. to N., and sheltered from all other winds. It is not intended in this Report to lay down any precise theory for the solution of all the observed phenomena of Liverpool Bay ; the collection of the facts recorded in the preceding portion of this Report, and in the charts and tables by which it is accompanied, has been so recently completed as entirely to preclude their satisfactory digest into any such hypothesis. In- deed these researches, so far from furnishing a complete analysis of the data upon which any trustworthy theory can be founded, give occasion to regret that the various changes-which the estuary has undergone were not more fully recorded than they have been prior to 1833; and it is especially to be regretted that the phenomena of meteorology should have been so much neglected in this district. The valuable records of the Liverpool Obser- vatory, as well as those of the Warrington Museum and Library, it is to be hoped, will supply the requisite information to future inquirers. In recording the previous observations on the changes in the bay, the earliest survey within the period of inquiry has been assumed as the starting- point, and succeeding phenomena are noted in chronological sequence ; it is now proposed to retrace the inquiry, in order, as far as practicable, to reduce effects to their proximate causes, important facilities being derived from the less imperfect data of the more recent periods. On comparing the surveys of 1854 and 1852, it was observed that the changes were aimost entirely confined to the increased tortuousness of the Victoria Channel, the continued silting up of the Zebra Channel, the opening of the Queen’s Channel, intermediate between the Zebra and the Victoria, and the contraction of the eastern portion of the Rock Channel with a con- sequent diminution of its average area. During this period there was no abstraction of tidal water space for dock purposes, and consequently no re- duction from ¢haé cause of the scour. In 1852 the rain-fall was about 50 per cent. above the average. In 1853 and 1854 the fall was about an average in each year. In the latter year, 1854, the wind was more than usually in the range from W. to N. It may be observed that as the influence of freshes in a tidal river is greatest when the ebb tide is low, their effects in the Mersey will be more apparent in the northera channel and its branches than in the western chan- nel, because the direction of the latter is almost at right angles to the course of the river, whilst that of the former is continuous; the bar which crosses a & : i i ly 4 THE RIVER MERSEY. 37 the western channel at its junction with the river will also tend to weaken the scour of the water when the tide is low. It appears then that the freshes of 1852, in passing down the northern channel, were deflected by the bank called Taylor’s Bank and Jordan Flats, on to the N.E. elbow of Great Burbo, itself of recent formation; after passing that elbow the ebb took the direction due to the impetus down Crosby Channel, moditied by the influence of Taylor-Jordan Bank combined with Great Burbo, passed over the shoals between the Zebra and Victoria Channels, and opened up the swatchway now known as the Queen’s Channel. The channel thus initiated by the freshes of 1852 was deepened by the con- ° tinued action of the ebb tide throughout that year and the following, until in 1854 we find the Queen’s Channel formed, the Zebra silting up from the loss of the water which then passed by the new channel. On the Victoria Bar, again, these freshes had won a slightly increased depth of water. The contraction of the Rock Channel may be due to the drift of sand promoted by the N.W. wind. * The most remarkable gales of the period 1852 and 1854 are those of De- cember 25 and 27, 1852, from the W.S.W. and S.W., from denudation by which the Cheshire land would protect the sand-banks; February 26, 1853, from N.N.W.; January 26, 1854, from W.; and February 17 and 18 of the same year, from N.W. and W.N.W. Very important changes have been recorded as having taken place between the years 1846 and 1852. They may be briefly described as consisting of the enlargement and consolidation of all the banks, with the bare exception of Mad Wharf, the increased size being in great measure due to increased elevation; the elongation of the Crosby Channel, chiefly in that part between the Rock Light and the Crosby Light-vessel; and the diminution of the average depth and area of this portion of the channel, accompanied by a slight alteration in its direction; in that part of this channel, between the Crosby and Formby Light-vessels, the depth was considerably increased, but the area diminished; the changes in the channel were occasioned by the growth of the north-east elbow of Great Burbo, and an accretion on the western side of the Taylor-Jordan Bank, both of which had taken place principally after the 1849 survey. On reference to the Warrington tables, we find that, in 1846, the rain-fall was slightly, but very slightly, below the average of twelve years; in the three following years it was above the same average, particularly in 1847, when the excess was about 16 per cent.; in 1850 the fall was 10 per cent. below the average, and in 1851 slightly above. It appears then, that during the years 1848 and 1849, and particularly in 1850, the banks had grown in directions to produce, in 1851, those changes which rendered necessary the survey of 1852. The increased depth of the channel between the lightships above mentioned, seems due to the contracted width of that part, consequent upon the enlargement of the banks. We have no record of the phenomena of wind during this period, and therefore can only conjecture that the horizontal and vertical growth of the banks are effects to which the prevailing winds may have been accessory, assisted by the loss of scour caused by the extensive dock-works of Liver- pool and Birkenhead. _ The change in the positions of the light-vessels and of the Bell Buoy was made after 1849. The depth of water on the Victoria Bar remained sta- tionary. In the Zebra Channel the depth of water had increased between 1846 and 1849, when the rain-fall was rather above the average; and between 1849 and 1852 the depth had diminished again. : 38 REPORT—1856. In the Rock Channel the average depth had been diminished, and the average area stationary. As it was during this period that the greatest amount of tidal area taken between two surveys was abstracted, the occasion is favourable for consider- ing the influence of works of that kind upon the sea channels. According to the evidence of Mr. Rendel, C.E., House of Commons, 1844 (see ‘ Ports and Docks of Birkenhead,’ by Thomas Webster, M.A., F.R.S., Barrister-at- Law, 1848, p. 77), high water of an 18-foot tide is 1" 25™ later at Warring- ton Bridge than it is at the Prince’s Pier, Liverpool, where it is 35™ later than at the Formby Light-vessel. And from Mr. Joseph Bouit’s observa- tions at Woolston Weir, four miles above Warrington, that on 8th March last, in a 21-foot tide, high water was 1” 50™ later than was recorded by the tide-gauge at George’s Pier, Liverpool. It follows, therefore, that the water which formerly covered the space now enclosed must have passed out to sea on the top of the ebb tide, whilst the flood tide was yet rising in the upper reaches of the river. The loss of depth in the Rock Channel appears to indicate that the abs- traction of the tidal area has been prejudicial. The surveys since 1833 indicate a progressive, though irregular, tendency towards the silting up of this channel; and there are facts which render it probable that the effects of diminished scour should first be manifested here. The tidal establishment is earlier at the North-west Lightship, or entrance of the western channel, than it is at the Bell Buoy, or entrance of the northern channel ; though the difference is very slight, it is sufficient to give a bias to the stream of tide, as is shown by the experience of bathers on the shore just above the junction of the Rock Channel with the river, who find that with a young flood there is a current out again to sea by the northern channel. The same also appears from the experiments of Mr. Enfield Fletcher, C.E., and others with floats. These were liberated at Wallasey Pool, on the ebb tide, for the purpose of ascertaining in what time the water from the pool would reach the Victoria Bar; but all the floats, without exception, went down the Rock Channel and grounded upon Dove Spit. This result may, in part, be due to the attraction of the Cheshire shore. The bias with the ebb would, however, be confined to the upper stratum of the water; the impetus of the current to sea naturally giving to the main bulk the more direct course by the northern channel, in preference to the almost right-angled deflection down the western channel. Whilst the Rock Channel has been losing depth, the depth of water in the northern channel, considered in its whole length from the Rock Lighthouse to the Bell Buoy, is almost undiminished since 1833. The loss on the Vic- toria Bar may be due to the diversion to the part of the stream formerly by the Zebra, now by the Queen’s Channel. But for the elevation of the banks and of the bottom of the Rock Channel, and of the south part of the Crosby Channel, it is difficult to assign any other cause than the loss of scour at the ~ first of the ebb, and the influence of the prevailing winds in drifting sand from the coast. As respects the Rock Channel, the influence of the new north wall in Bootle Bay is very likely to aggravate the tendency to silt up, as it tends to impede the advance of the flood tide through that channel by substituting for a shelving shore a nearly perpendicular face almost at right angles to the course of the flood. The influence which the direction of the enclosure walls may have upon the course of tide has yet to be considered. It appears that between 1846 and 1849, during which these works were in progress, there was no alteration in the direction of any of the channels; See ee THE RIVER MERSEY. 39 and that between 1849 and 1852, these works being still in progress, the direction of the Victoria Channel was so altered that the Bell Buoy was removed about 1000 yards westward of its position in‘ 1846; and that in the upper or southern portion of the northern channel there had been no changes in the fairway track beyond those consequent upon the elongation of the part between the Rock Lighthouse and Crosby Light-vessel. The change in the Victoria Channel is probably due to the lengthening of the Crosby Channel, which has been attributed to the growth of the sand- banks; and it does not appear that the extension of the dock walls had yet been productive of much effect on the direction of the sea channels. Between 1840 and 1846 the most remarkable of the recorded changes are, a large increase in the size of the Formby Bank; a slight diminution in those of Great Burbo and East Hoyle, principally in elevation; and a slight dimi- nution in the depth of the Crosby Channel, principally in its northern part. There was a remarkable drought in 1844, the rain-fall at Warrington having been about 33 per cent. below the average of twelve years. There was also an extraordinary continuance of easterly winds in this year. No remarkable meteorological phenomena are recorded for the preceding year. The large increase in the size of Formby Bank, and the loss of elevation in East Hoyle and Great Burbo, are possibly to be ascribed to the influence of the wind. ; In 1840 to 1846 the Liverpool dock-works abstracted about 117 acres of tidal area in northern works. Between 1837 and 1840 the most remarkable change in the northern channel is in the direction of the Victoria Channel, as indicated by the removal of the Bell Buoy about 2000 yards northwards, accompanied by a loss of 2 feet of water on the bar. According to a letter of Lieut. Lord’s of October 8th, 1839%, the dredging operations had deepened the water on the Victoria Bar to 15 feet. On the survey of 1840, that depth was reduced to 10 feet and 11 feet. In the period of 1837 to 1840 there had been a loss of depth in the southern portion of the Crosby Channel, and a similar gain in the northern part of the same; a considerable reduction in the size of Formby Bank, equal to 30 per cent. ; an increase in the Great Burbo; a loss of half the depth on the bar of the Rock Channel, and a loss of average area in the same channel equal to 6 per cent. per annum; and a diminution in the area and elevation of East Hoyle. There were no important dock-works during this period. There are no meteorological observations which throw light upon the cause of these changes beyond,—lIst, the fact that there were great floods in 1839 in various parts of Great Britain, by which much injury was ocea- sioned to the hay and other crops; and though the local ‘ Mercury’ of the date has no record of floods in the Mersey, there may have been freshets ; and, 2nd, the vivid recollection of the terrific and destructive hurricane from the S.W., which visited the town and port on the 6th and 7th of January, 1839, during which the North-west Lightship and many of the buoys in the channel were washed from their moorings, and several vessels were wrecked. The following curious sequence is deduced from the foregoing obser- vations :— Phenomena and _— Praductive Date of date thereof. interval. survey. Gale, January.... 1839 ...... A830 V)esvis 1840 Drought"... .. DSA ee racars 1845 ...... 1846 Freshes ........ 1847 ...... 1848 ...... 1849 Drought 1.4.6... 1850 134..::5 1851 ....0. 1852 Freshes 5.1. ta wt) 1852) 2 .)a8s 1853 ..see- 1854 * Tn the ‘ Liverpool Mercury’ of that month, 40 REPORT—1856. Between 1833 and 1837 was perfected that remarkable change in the northern outlet of the Mersey, of which Capt. Denham has recorded so many important particulars in his ‘ Sailing Directions,’ and in communications to the Association. But there is such a complete dearth of observations upon the changes which preceded the opening of this new outlet in 1833, and upon the meteorological phenomena by which they were preceded, or accom- panied, that the result of any detailed inquiry must necessarily be extremely precarious. The same observations apply to periods immediately subse- quent and precedent to Capt. Thomas’s survey in 1813. The general features of the consolidation and enlargement of the principal sand-banks, and also of the eastern shore of the estuary, may be observed upon this survey, and also upon all the authentic surveys since that of Capt. Collins in 1689. It is also remarkable that the low-water margin of the eastern shore appears to have advanced westward to an extent fully equal to one-half the width of the northern channel as laid down by Collins, or 1000 yards. From a report of Mr. George Rennie, C.E., to the Corporation of Liver- pool, in 1838, it appears that at that time upwards of 13,000 acres had been abstracted from the tidal area of the river, the original extent of which is estimated at about 35,000 acres, and these abstractions were principally in the upper part of the river. Since then no important abstractions have been made without the sanction of Parliament. The tidal area appropriated to the dock purposes of Liverpool alone since 1650 amounts to 784 acres, exclusive of the open basins; of these, 470 acres have been appropriated within the last fifteen years. From the foregoing remarks it appears that the changes in Liverpool Bay are to be attributed principally to the influence of freshes, droughts, wind, and the reduction of tidal area; and that remedial measures adopted for the maintenance or improvement of the appreaches should be specially designed to cooperate with these forces. It may perhaps be thought that sufficient consideration has not been given to the very large amount of silt, which, according to Capt. Denham, in his paper in the ‘Reports’ of the Association (1837), is being constantly washed down by the river and deposited in the bay. The attention of the Committee has so far been confined principally to the phenomena of the bay. Captain Denham supposed the silt to be derived from the shores of the upper part of the river, where there is no doubt that the tidal water continues to encroach upon the land. From the geological formation of this land, a large proportion of the silt must consist of clay and mud, with but avery small proportion of sand. The former, from its levity, is mostly conveyed away by the ebb tide, a thin deposit being only temporarily left upon the sandy shores and banks of the upper and lower estuaries, which is either dried up and dissipated by the wind, or removed by those neap tides which are too low to be able to continue the encroachments of the spring tides. Two local changes seem to require special notice before concluding this Report :— Ist. The waste of the clay cliffs in Cheshire, from Seacombe Pvint to North Egremont, which has now been going on to a considerable extent and for some years. This, there can be little doubt, is a consequence of the North Dock-works of Liverpool, by which the river has had its channel much con- tracted, and has naturally sought its equivalent from the opposite and weaker side. 2nd. The waste on the Cheshire shore, adjacent to Leasowe Castle, west- wardly. According to Mr. Rollett, the acting-surveyor of the Wallasey Em- bankment, under the surveyor to the Corporation of Liverpool, this waste has averaged 6 yards per annum for nearly thirty years past. It is, however, con- ———————— a THE RIVER MERSEY. As fined to a small lineal extent of the coast, about two miles. The situation is one that is now very much exposed to the flood tide through the Horse Chan- nel, especially in N.W. winds. The geological formation is entirely alluvial, consisting of sand, peat, and clay. It is, in fact, the site of part of the so- called submarine forest of Wirral. _ When Hoyle Lake was in existence, the flood tide advancing in two streams—one through the lake, the other through the Horse Channel—met at this place, and their united stream ran up the Rock Channel. It may be assumed that the influence on the beach of the stream through the Horse ‘Channel was mitigated by the stream through Hoyle Lake, by which it was deflected into the Rock Channel. As the lake was silted up the influ- ence of the stream was gradually weakened, until it was entirely lost by the closing up of the lake. The enlargement of the west spit of Great Burbo has also assisted to give to the stream through the Horse Channel, a more direct set upon the beach. About thirty years ago the late Mr. Giles, C.E., constructed an embankment upwards of 100 yards above high water spring tides. The seaward slope is now submerged every tide; and as it was not designed for such a situation, it has been occasionally broken through, almost entirely reconstructed and considerably raised. Great watchfulness is exercised by those who have charge of the embank- ment; for if the sea were to make good its entrance through any breach, a large tract of meadow country, nearly 3000 statute acres, would be sub- merged in their whole extent to the docks at Birkenhead. These meadows are part of the tidal area which had been reclaimed, and was formerly submerged through Wallasey Pool. Liverpool, August 1856. JosEPH Bout. [With respect to the tables D, E, F, and G, by which this Report is ac- companied, it should, perhaps, be observed that they are to be regarded as only approximations to the truth, and not as representing the absolute areas of the channels, or volumes of the banks; and they are merely intended as gauges for comparing the growth or decline of the various features included in them. The truth of the observation would be apparent to all who had inspected the surveys; it is recorded here for those who have not had the opportunity of doing so. ] The Report was illustrated by the following charts and tables :— A.—Plate I. Admiralty Chart of Liverpool Bay, corrected to 1847, with Contours from Surveys by Collins, 1689; Eyes and Fearon, 1756 ; Thomas, 1813. B.—A Chart of the Approaches to Liverpool, by Lieut. Lord, R.N., 1852, with Contours from Denham, 1837; Lord, 1840; and Lord, 1846. C.—A Chart of the Approaches to Liverpool, by Lieut. Lord, R.N., 1854 ; with Contours from Lord, 1852. D, E, F.—Tables, showing the average depth below low water of ordi- nary Spring Tides, and the average sectional Area of the Crosby and Rock Channels, computed from the Surveys of 1837, 1840, 1846, 1852, and 1854. G.—A Table, showing the average Volume of the Banks above Low _ Water of ordinary Spring Tides, computed from the Surveys of 1837, 1840, 1846, 1852, and 1854. H.—A Plan exhibiting the space abstracted by the Corporation of Liver- pool from the Tidal Water of the River Mersey during five successive Periods, comprised between the years 1650 and 1843, compiled from authen- tic Documents and actual Survey. J.—Sections of Part of Great Burbo Bank, on Planes parallel to a Plane passing through the Leasowe and Formby Lighthouses. REPORT—1856. 42 eez‘ot | so+ srs‘or | sot ‘spawA = “J TOM CLAR ‘6 pure g suutny -09 Supp 10 *SyIVUII yy *jossaq Aquax0g 03 Sry yoy Wosy oSvraav 9} AMOYS SyOxOwAG UT SUTINTOD OMG OTL 2S ee ee eo eee ee eo a Een = eo es ee OO8F|\"** PLOT “MOT! “FEST OOSFl* PLOT “ynavT| “ZEST 00Z9|""* PLOT “ArT “OFST QO8g|"** PLOT “INOVT] “OFST oggg|rueyua, dep) *ZE8T e80'91| 8% | 0086 192] ZIZ‘L1\Ss, Ses‘ LT 6% o0s‘orl¢e L¥9‘S 116 ISF'9T| 8% | OFF'SISZ| 00%‘ STIFS| VOT‘6T|L£Z| B99‘ LT\LE| OS8'9T|6Z 66981) 92 | 006'91\Fz| OCe'LZ1\ez| LEz'TZ|FZ| 099‘6I Sz] 916 ZT|0E| LOT'ST\Ee 0966162 Les 1t| Lz 1g6‘S1FZ 9GZ‘Z Lez] SZO'6T 6Z| OZO'L1|6Z| LE8‘Z1|LZ| 86S°L10E 109‘SI| Lz zea lec! SsZ'F LFS] £22'21 92] OLL'E1/93) O99'ST 62] OOS*LTITE ‘sprvd | “45 ‘spavd |*9| ‘sprvd |*9J| *spavd [95 ‘savod |'gp| ‘spaed [95 *spaed |*9y ‘spavd |"95 se je2| o2 (El 2% (S| 2 El] 2 Ele? El] ee El a2 Sa [Pa] Pe \F| Fa iF) Pa iF) Pe FF) Pe |Fi fe iF) 23 fF DB’ 5 } ar ‘on | ‘gon | -gcon | ‘yon | ‘econ | “eON | “TON f goe'L1)1-86 9B1‘L119-86+ ePF'ST/G-86+ 96L'L1| 66— 9ge'Z1] 66+ ‘spavd | ‘go0y ocala o is 3 = spf ise as ‘Que NT Bo 8 1oA9AIng po Be Be, *faaing jo ayeq meas Sie dot Se es oa e ss el eS SS ee Se ‘jassaq 7ySry Aquis0,7 03 Jessa, FySrT AqsorQ—jouuey Aqsoig—q ATIV,L GLLLI| 66+ | 82691] 6B zee'si'gz 1ee'erlgzl oLFgtlFal sgz‘oclez| L9¢‘Z1 22] Gor‘er|0e| L90‘61|ee) OZ‘9T/ee ers‘o1|se 909'1 66 zos'Lt| 6a | o9r'stite| £18°91\82| 009‘91|9¢] zee‘Z1\ez| 8z9‘ZT\9e| £8€'91|0e) $49°6T][€| £80°L1)18 S16‘L1/98 pie GES] OF Lvi‘z1\22 9e'et|sz| e26's1\£e| 062‘0e|ce| COL‘Os|FE| 299'Z1]L€) Sze LT)ee uoaos ysiy | GLO'ST| OF 098‘stlgzl Fgg‘STigz| 000‘0%/gz| 81Z‘6T|Oe| OOS ZT|TE] OSH LTTE 122818 ou Jo 988 | oge' ‘etlpcl eee'oLoz| eee‘ lelee] S£2‘zelee| Zee'el|ce| OOPS I\Ze =ABAB OUR 10 Deh 4 sspaed |-93 | ‘spared |-93 arg ’ ae “4 pa oF 1 og . by i sspavd |'9y| “spavd |-4y 2 > . eis paul => te a —acigia & lok sols ee wun | 29 |83| 92 (| 92 (| 22 12] 92 | 92 El a2 El ge El ge El ge Faas Gea le A a hp li 8 ‘6°on | ‘g‘ON | ‘Z°ON | ‘9 ON | “G‘ON | ‘FON | “E°ON | “GON | “TON | ee SS a te el aS, a Da Ss ees = ae ‘JossoA WSry Aqsorg 0} asnoyiysry yooy—yeuuvyy Akqsorg—"_ ATAV L | 00L8}""* PLOT “N9LT ‘F981 ‘OFSI *faamg Jo 978 OOL8}"** PLOT “NVT) “SST 0GL9\""* PIO'T “9N9I'T| “9FET 00L9)"** PLOT “yNIVT Ooggmequag *ydeD) "Lest spa o8 ‘oweN, Boy s,10f0ang Be fo of ww THE RIVER MERSEY. “-sapy Surids Areurpso jo Joye MOT—waNjeq “OZIs agnjosgn may) ATayeurxordde ATuO syuasorder pur ‘saaIL ONIUdS LO WALVA AOT BA0gL SyURq [eI9AOS Oy) JO 13MOIS aazpnundiuoo yy syuoserdax 9[qQRI, stud, OSF6LS'F8 | SZL‘6FF'S6 OSF'629'F8 | LEz'Eel'96 6SZ'EF6 TL | 6I9‘ZIF'08 E86'E29'SL | 9LELTSSL EEE'61S 18 | OF2°896'9L ‘efor seq ‘TIOL V6SS |L1—| SLPF | LI | S£8F | GI | SSZP | SI | OO8E | IL | O&4% | IL | ZTZT | EL | Eazt | G1 | Zee é GO8Z |I1—| L9FF | LT | SELF | ST | LOGH | ZI | OG8E | ZI | OLGE | ZL | OS6T | IL | OSOT | cI | Z9E G P16Z [i+] 0092 | GI | LI6F | EL | O9ES | GI | EezF | EL | eese | EL | OFSS | eI | GLI | FT | Ig |¢% LV8Z |G-IL| 89h | SI | O£40E | ST | 80S | IT | GOSE | IT | ZOLZ | SL | L2ZS | SI | OFLI | 91 | L9E é ThE G-61| £909 | SI | OS6E | ET | LIS9 | LT | €FZS | FI | OOTE | SI | O99L | FI | OOST | FI | O99 € ‘spared | -gaay | ‘spxed | *jaay| *spavd | -gooz] ‘spaed | AT By he 9. New Brighton .... 12 30... 23 O. 7 S08. 287 mates 32. S-ePrince s Docks.) -:a.. 2,00, ... “23'9 8 |. 1 AOr aS. Zee aoe A ovillesmeare ont... BO .e 2g oT AO oe Ee eee ee 5.ehuncom 4.2. u.8. 9 12s 2 oA... 8" Ori. a9 02-5. 6. Fidler’s Ferry...... 1G os WED | cee 38 DG 18 105. 4.6. 7. Warrington Bridge.. 2 30.. 25 10. 9 40 18 Bom) We These observations were taken simultaneously ; and it may be seen that, at the Prince’s Pier, which is in the narrowest gorge of the estuary, the tide heaps up 8 inches and 7 inches in the two miles from New Brighton. The velocity of the flood tide at Seacombe is recorded as 7211 feet per second, the width of the Mersey being there reduced to 3060 feet, and the sectional area 184,622 feet, it being altogether a gorge at that point defined by the Prince’s Dock wall on the one side, and the natural rock of Seacombe on the other. This has been aptly designated the neck of the bottle, extending one mile from Egremont Ferry to Seacombe Ferry, where the Mersey is half a mile - broad to Prince’s Pier, extending about one mile to the old fort before the Stanley Dock was begun in 1844, at which time the mouth of the Mersey bottle was between Egremont and the old fort, from whence a curved wall half a mile east to Beacon’s Gutter was built in 1833, the north shore to Rimrose Brook (some three and a half miles) forming with the shore from Seacombe to New Brighton what may be termed the funnel for filling the bottle of the Mersey. These positions are exhibited on the map appended to the Report of Mr. James Walker, C.E., to the conservators of the River Mersey, on the effects of the new north river-line of the Liverpool docks on the Cheshire shore, published June 1856, pp. 306, with abstract notes of evidence. As these documents contain much valuable information bearing on the effects produced on the channels of the Mersey by the alteration made in its banks, the following extracts are given, premising that the complaint was the waste of the Cheshire shore about Egremont. The Report states, there is no reason to doubt that an increase of damage has taken place and is con- tinuing, and that the Liverpool dock walls are the principal cause. “ One thing is certain, that the Liverpool dock trustees have acquired since 1844 an area of not less than 500 acres of land from the river; upon this they have made splendid docks, and are now proceeding to add to them for the benefit of the country, on a greater scale than they have hitherto done. THE RIVER MERSEY. 45 “‘ That the proper remedy for the prevention of further waste is a river wall or other similar protection, from Seacombe to New Brighton; and that the dock trustees, in consideration of the damage done and of their having already occupied 500 acres of the Mersey, and proposing to occupy in a few years 150 acres more, which will increase the waste on the Cheshire shore, may be reasonably expected to take the protection into their consideration. “That the effect which dock walls on the Liverpool side have had, or are likely to have, in deepening the navigation of the Mersey or its entrance channels, does not amount to much more than a tendency.” The evidence of Capt. Cook, Superintendent of Pilots, states, “ There are now four channels, viz. the Rock or Horse, Victoria, Queen's, Zebra or Eastern Channels. Large vessels enter by the Victoria Channei. The Queen’s improves, but not yet log-lined. Not very important to have very deep entrances into Liverpool, as ; the heavy ships enter the docks. ft. in. Depth on Victoria Bar at lowest tide...... 10 0 PR witOn areas. Lapis Ox eehys, NG ie Sita eat atadey Only High water, spring tide ....... 0.1.2.2... 41 0 Depth of water anon ie iN tide Sa. 22 18: 9G Orie kee a RA), at noe Depth on the Bar, high water neaps ...... 33 6 West wind raises the tide 5 or 6 feet, east wind cuts the tide as much. As regards the effects of the dock walls already built upon the navigation of the river, Mr. J. Hartley, Lieut. Lord, and the dock-masters assert that there has been no perceptible difference in the height of the tides for many years, the old tables of depth upon the sills of the docks being still found to be the correct guide, and the velocity, so far as they can observe, being un- altered.” Some witnesses considered that the tides rose vertically 2 feet higher at Sea- combe, but no gauge having been kept, the impression may have arisen from . the greater effect, or in “consequence of the lash of the waves upon the Cheshire side being heavier,” since the last built portion of the “dock wall is placed so as to meet the waves that are brought by the westerly gales through the Rock Channel.” This is shown on the Plan attached to the Report; and the Report states, “It is also to be expected that the rebound will be increased when the gap which at present leaves a portion of Bootle Bay open to receive the seas, shall be filled up by a wall, as I presume is intended.” A reference to the Plan will show that the filling up of this gap would not only greatly increase the evils complained of at Seacombe, but cause the Rock Channel to silt up in a few years, as Hoylake has done; and should the wall be extended to Rimrose Brook, as proposed in 1858, enclosing 150 acres, it will greatly reduce the flow of water into the Mersey by con- tracting the entrance between the fort on the Rock Point and high water at Bootle Bay, distant 14 mile or 2700 yards. The map shows the present end of wall to extend 900 yards across the entrance to a river wall of 250 yards towards a gap of 700 yards, thus reducing the entrance between the river wall and the Fort on Rock Point to 1800 yards, with a bulb between Seacombe and New Brighton, where the sea and tide through the Rock Channel deflected from the Liverpool wall are wasting the shore. The only remedy for this being, as stated in the Report, “ the “construction of a wail 4000 yards long from Seacombe to New Brighton.” 46 REPORT—1856. From opposite Seacombe the Liverpool dock wall extends 4000 yards to the gap in Bootle Bay: by ending it there, only a curved line, similar to that in 1833, shown in the Plan, with a sloping sea-wall, would allow the sea to expend itself in Bootle Bay as heretofore, and act as the eastern side of the funnel of the Mersey, the Rock Channel forming the western. The effects these alterations may have had on the levels of the tides in the Mersey, since they were recorded by Mr. Rendel in 1844, we have no means of comparing, as it will be seen by the before-mentioned table; they only relate to two tides of that year, which are so much affected by the wind as to form no criterion, it requiring the average of a long period to establish any change in the mean height and flow of the tide. We are indebted to Lieut. Lord for the only reliable results derived from the observations of the self-registering tide-gauge at George’s Pier, Liver- pool. The discussion of two years of these tidal observations, 1854—55, by Mr. Burdwood, of the Hydrographer’s Office, Admiralty, gives the following mean :— Datum, Old Dock Sill. Establishment (High Water, full and change) 112 35™ Greenwich time. High water :— ft, Jin, Springs.—Average height above the sill.... 18 0 DAN Rs snot! <8 Meek 2 Satiok sh Neg aise. Stu Ate 12 2 Low water :— Springs.—Average height below the sill.... 8 O GAPS vrai acs!testhcrdnaclad tiwwadinrls ewhd. hes 2 4 Admiralty, 2nd June 1856, J. BuRDWoop. Lieut. Lord’s diagrams furnish the levels of high and low water, direction and force of the wind, and height of the barometer every day in the year, as well as an intermediate line indicating the ordinary sea-level as averaging 6 feet above the old dock sill. As these observations are to be continued at several stations on the Mersey, we may look upon them as the basis of future observations on the changes in the level and flow of the tides in that river. Mr. Rendel’s diagrams are very useful, as recordi::g the tidal wave in 1844 as well as the relative time of high water at the Bar, New Brighton, Prince’s Dock, Runcorn, Fidler’s Ferry, and Warrington Bridge. From information obligingly furnished to the Committee by Mr. Fereday Smith, Mr. R. Skay, and Mr. Edward Johnes and other sources, we may confidently contemplate the establishinent of a record of the tides of the Mersey, both at Ellesmere and other points, with reliable data and informa- tion on the important subject. Cheltenham, 12th August 1856. ANDREW HENDERSON. Interim Report to the British Association, on Progress in Researches on the Measurement of Water by Weir Boards. By James Tuomson, C.E. Belfast, August 6, 1856. Havine at last year’s meeting of the Association read in the Mechanical Section a short paper on the Measurement of Water by Weir Boards, and having been requested by the General Committee to prepare a Report on the same subject, I beg now to state that I have in the meantime been col- han ea WEIR BOARDS.—FRITH OF CLYDE. 47 lecting information for the purposes of that Report. My professional en- gagements have occupied me necessarily so much as to oblige me to defer for this year the detailed prosecution of the subject and the preparation of the Report in full. I have, however, the gratification of stating, that, with special reference to the researches entrusted to me by the Association, the President of the Athenzeum of Boston, United States, Mr. Thomas G. Cary, has generously sent to me, with the request that it be presented to the British Association on his behalf, a valuable book, containing accounts of experiments recently carried out on a very grand scale in America on the measurement of large bodies of flowing water by means of Weir boards and by other methods. The work is entitled ‘Lowell Hydraulic Experiments,’ by James B. Francis. In reference to the experiments, Mr. Cary, the donor of the book, states in his letter to me, ‘‘ These experiments, made under the direction and at the expense of the associated companies of Lowell, near Boston, who employ Mr. Francis as the engineer for their cotton and woollen factories, have cost about £4000 sterling ; and they make part in a series of investigations which have cost those companies £15,000.” In the Report which I hope to submit to the British Association, I shall have much occasion for reference to these important experiments, and for this purpose I think it right to retain the book in my hands at present. As the expenses incurred in reference to the researches have been but small, and chiefly for the procuring of books, I do not desire to draw for them on the fund of £10 liberally placed at my disposal by the Association ; and as my intention is, not to conduct experiments on the subject myself, but chiefly to give a review of the most important experiments and deduc- tions which have been made by others, I do not think it necessary to ask for a renewal of the grant. Dredging Report.—Frith of Clyde. 1856. Ar the last meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, held in Glasgow, the following resolution was adopted :— “ That a Committee, consisting of the Rev. C. P. Miles, M.D., Professor Balfour, Dr. Greville, and Mr. Eyton, be requested to report on the dredging of the West coast of Scotland, and that the sum of £10 be placed at their disposal for the purpose.” Of the Committee only two members have been able to devote any time to the object contemplated, viz. Dr. Greville, and the Rev. C. P. Miles. The latter, having engaged a residence on Holy Island, Lamlash Bay, was joined by the former on June 9th, when both were prepared to commence a systematic course of dredging, and to give up their whole time, for several weeks, to the work. They had provided themselves with the Government charts, and with such books on the different departments of marine zoology as were likely to be of service; they had also everything requisite for the preservation of specimens ; and they had at their command a small yacht*, and a stout four-oared cutter}. So far, therefore, as material was concerned, the Committee had armed themselves for a vigorous campaign. In the arrangement for their plan of proceeding, the Committee took into * This vessel was lent to the Rev. Mr. Miles (on the condition of his paying the expenses of fitting her out) by Alexander Melville, Esq., Glasgow. + The property of Dr. Carpenter, Holy Island, Arran. 48 REPORT—1856. consideration the terms of their instructions; and they came to the conclusion that it would be impossible to draw up a satisfactory Report in the course ofa single season. They do not regard a mere enumeration of the forms of animal life, as observed from time to time by different individuals, as the object contemplated by the Association, but rather some account of the distribution of those forms in the estuary and Lochs of the Clyde, coupled with some efforts to render our knowledge of the Fauna more complete. It appeared to them that the most proper course would be for the Committee, not to aim too suddenly at issuing a general Report, but rather to present, for some time to come, an annual statement of their labours. By a judicious change of head-quarters, they would be enabled, in successive seasons, to pursue their investigations in a way best calculated to promote the ultimate views of the Association. The naturalist’s dredge has been used in the Clyde for some years by various persons, but, as far as is ascertained, without any special plan ; and although in many instances notes have been preserved, the existing materials for a full Report are utterly insufficient. Of the different localities, Lamlash Bay has, perhaps, acquired the greatest reputation. It occurred therefore to the Committee that it would be peculiarly desirable to ascertain, with some precision, the extent and distribution of the forms existing in this sec- tion of the Clyde—stating whether they are rare or frequent in these parts. They hoped to accomplish this end with comparatively little trouble, as they had repeatedly dredged over portions of the same ground on former oceca- sions ; and, further, they had the experience of Major Martin and of the late Rev. Dr. Landsborough to assist them. Other places in the vicinity of Lamlash Bay were marked out for examination, with special reference to Kilbrennan Sound, on the west side of Arran, which, it is believed, has been unexplored by the scientific dredger. To their exceeding regret the Committee have to state that they had scarcely made their arrangements before the weather became adverse. Rain and wind—the latter often rising to a gale—set in, and continued, with a few exceptional days, throughout the months of June and July, that is, from the moment they were prepared to commence operatiors until the last day at their disposal previous to the Meeting of the Association. The precarious position of the dredger could not be more forcibly illustrated. During the first month scarcely more than one day in each week would admit of the dredge being used, and, altogether, there were only jifteen days available for the prosecution of the work, which was sometimes attempted when the seve- rity of the weather made it all but impracticable to sail the yacht, and when the employment of the four-oared cutter would have been impossible. The intended visit to the west of Arran has consequently been postponed ; and, under these disastrous circumstances, the unfortunate Committee found occupation, in spite of rain and wind, in searching the pools and coast at low tide, and in collecting the littoral nudibranchs, echinoderms, crustaceans, &c. The ground explored by the dredge embraces, as marked in the accom- panying map* (Plate II.), the following well-defined localities :—The south side of Brodick Bay, from Invercloy to Corriegills, in depths varying from 7 to 25 fathoms; the entire area of Lamlash Bay, from Clachland Point to the north end of Holy Island, and from the south end of Holy Island to Kings- cross Point ; the eastern, or outer side of Holy Island, from Hamilton’s Rock, near Clachland Point, to the most southern point of the island, in from 30 to 6 fathoms ; and from Fullarton’s Rock to Whiting Bay. The subjoined Tables give the results of the labours of the Committee :— * The map is an exact copy of the Government Chart, DREDGING.—FRITH OF CLYDE. 49 TABLE I.—Mollusca. Species. Station. Remarks. Acmea testudinalis........ Littoral—Holy Island, &c.... Abundant. WITBINER) w\5 o= occ cine Laminarian zone. Anomia ephippium........ Generally diffused. . Aplysia hybrida .......... Rock-pools, Holy Island, &c. Not uncommon. Aporrhais pes-pelecani .... Astarte sulcata Buccinum undatum Cardium edule........ — echinatum — Norvegicum ween ae Cerithium reticulatum Chiton asellus — ruber Corbula nucleus Crania anomala Cylichna cylindracea Cypreea Europxa.......... Cyprina Islandica Dentalium entalis Emarginula reticulata... Eulima polita == 0 eee Fissurella reticulata..... Fusus antiquus Islandicus Kellia rnbra........... — suborbicularis..... Lamellaria —— ? Lima hians — Loscombii — littoralis — littorea Littorina Neritoides i Lyonsia Norvegica subtruncata Mangelia Leufroyi \ —— linearis — rufa, var. Ulideana Mactra solida } Modiola Modiolus Montacuta substriata Mytilus edulis Nassa incrassata. — reticulata er seen ee sees eee eee es eo Cr acy ay eae or ee eee eee tee eee eeeee subauriculata..... er ey seen ee ee Generally diffused—Deep water. Only dead shells obtained. Lamlash sands. Lamlash Bay. Deep water between Holy Is- land and Clachland Point. Generally diffused. Ditto. Ditto. Between Holy Island and Clachland Point. Adult specimems rare. Ditto. Dittousial iePh So siete ata Not uncommon. ... Ditto Ditto. Lamlash Bay ..........-- Only dead shells. Between Holy Island and Common. Clachland Point. .». Ditto Near the north end of Holy ae DHT Sa eeAsceeaar ocr Island in from 10 to 30 Ditto fathoms. --. Ditto. : Near Fullarton’s Rock, in Lae about 20 fathoms. SP MGIELOEML? sc wie w/elaia sis opbitata Attached to Lichina pygmea. ese Liamlash Bay ..\2.... (esc Found inside dead shells of Artemis exoleta. .-. Littoral—Holy Island. North end of Holy Island in The nests of Z. hians in this about 10 and 15 fathoms. locality are very abundant. Near Fullarton’s Rock...... Only single valves found. Holy Island, &e. Between Holy Island and Clachland Point. Lamlash Bay and off Holy ines Island. Between Holy Island and Scarce. Clachland Point. Between Fullarton’sRockand Only one specimen obtained. King’s Cross Point. Between Holy Island and Three specimens obtained in Clachland Point. from 15 to 25 fathoms. Lamlash Bay. North end of Holy Island .. On the spines of Spatangus purpureus. Round the coast Immature and scarce. eters eeee Generally diffused. Natica Alleri Between Holy Island and N. monilifera scarce. —— monilifera >} ...... eo. Clachland Point E —— Montagui } : Ostrea edulis ............ Lamlash Bay by Holy Island. Patella athletica 2 — pellucida } seeeeeee Holy Island, &c, ~ —— vulgata 1856, E 50 Species. Pecten maximus ....-.-+-- — opercularis ..-...-- we striatus tigrinus } Pectunculus glycimeris -...- Philine aperta Pholas crispata Pileopsis Hungarica Pleurobranchus Pilidium fulvum Psammobia Ferroensis >... - ea Puncturella Noachina Purpura lapillus Rissoa striata Scaphander lignarius Tapes decussata Tellina donacina .........- er rd Terebratula caput-serpentis . Teredo Norvegica Thracia phaseolina Trichotropis borealis Trochus alabastrum. . Polycera quadrilineata Triopa claviger Bor Species. Carcinus Mznas Cr REPORT—1 856. TaBLe I. (continued.) Station. Remarks. North endof HolyIsland; also Scarce. near Fullarton’s Rock. Throughout the district .... Between Holy Island and Clachland Point. North end of Holy Island. Throughout Lamlash Bay -. Near Lamlash Pier. North end of Holy Island. Holy Island at low water -. Abundant in certain localities. Scarce; dead shells of P. tigrinus not uncommon. Not uncommon in any part. Found four individuals under stones: probably they are North end of Holy Island. P. membranaceus. Littoral. Holy Island, &e. Generally diffused. North end of Holy Island. Holy Island, &c. North end of Holy Island. Ditto. Holy Island North end of Holy Island. Between Holy Island and Clachland Point. Lamlash Bay Fine specimens of the tubes obtained from the wreck of the old pier. ee es ed Dredged by Mr. Eyton. Lamlash shore. Tasce IITI.—Crustacea. cinerarius .........- North end of Holy Island. sme Magus. .-.2cceee ve se Near the pier, Holy Island. —— millegranus........ .- North end of Holy Island. —— tumidus ........+.-.. Ditto. =——=— THMDILCAENS ta siay eis) « Holy Island, &c., littoral T. umbilicatus is the common shell of these shores. ZIZYPDIDUS) 6) 210. <\=. «10 w= North end of Holy Island .. 7. zizyphinus is scarce. . Turritella communis ...... Ditto. Venus casina 9.2 26.556 sa.5 Ditto | fascidtan. sinus. Wises Ditto | OVata OFFes 5 tame... Ditto . —-— striatula ............ Ditto . TasLe IJ.—Nudibranchiate Mollusca. Species. Remarks. Doris aaa eae under stones at low water on Holy taberculatay|iccisie dactmae! woe ne Island, &c. Common. Eolis Drummondi -.........50.0.e5-+s<- Ditto. Not uncommon. . Goniodoris nodosa ....°....-. hss. -se0te Ditto. One exatple found on Holy Island. Dredged (probably a new species) in about 15 Lomanotus Di Va slodsae teres waite Sey af fathoms between Macdonald’s Hotel, In- vercloy, and Corriegills. Cancer Pagurus Ebalia Pennantii Eurynome aspera Galathea Hippolyte varians Homarus vulgaris Hyas araneus Inachus Dorsettensis Pagurus Bernhardus ...... — Prideauxii a een n eee sg 8 6 0 00, 9.0.0.8, 5 0 ee ewww ee rs we enee Ce et Palzmon Squilla Pandalus annulicornis...... Station. Remarks. Holy Island, &c. .......... Abundant round these shores. BVIELO Sv oseis. 0 nae lopatt ae eliort Ditto. North end of Holy Island .. Not very uncommon. LDH eG aminocoao onic teac 3 or 4 specimens obtained. Generally diffused ........ All immature examples. Lamlash Bay. Everywhereround shore... . Tolerably abundant. Generally diffused. Ditto. Ditto Ditto...+..... seeeseeeees Always accompanied by Adamsia palliata. Rock Pools .....e-.«. Lamlash Bay. Common round the coast. DREDGING.—FRITH OF CLYDE, 51 Tas_e II. (continued.) Species. Station. Remarks. . Porcellana longicornis..... . North end of Holy Island. — platycheles.......... Littoral. Holy Island, &c... Abundant round the coast. Stenorhynchus Phalangium.. Generally diffused ........ Not common. Tasie [V.—Echinodermata. Amphidotus cordatus ...... Generally diffused ........ Common. Asterias aurantiaca..... -.- Near Fullarton’s Rock...... Only two specimens obtained. Asterina gibbosa .........- Littoral. North end of Holy Under stones in a pool. Island. Chirodota digitata ........ Near the Pier (south side), Infrom 15 to about 6fathoms. Holy Island. Comatula rosacea ........ Pier, Holy Island, and Fullar- Abundant in about8tol5fms. ton’s Rock. Cribella oculata .......... North end, Holy Island. —— TOSEA we ee ee ieee eens DDTitOle Heat ee este ete whee Rare. Echinocyamus pusillus .... Generally diffused. Echinus miliaris .......... Ditto. —— sphera ....-.es00e Ditto. Goniaster Templetoni...... Ditto. Luidia fragillissima........ Ditto. Ophiocoma bellis .......... Ditto. —— granulata .......... Ditto. —— rosula ......ceereees Ditto. Ophiura texturata ........ Ditto Palmipes membranaceus.... Between Holy Island and Rare. Clachland Point in 25 fms. ee eta « fiantersi 3% Lamlash Bay. patangus purpureus Soin te Ba } --.. North end, Holy Island. eevneae } Ay: OR 2 Generally diffused. TasLEe V.—Zoophyta. Species. Remarks. Actinia bellis, ig he Common in the pools and round the whole RECO LIRC ES i a ies Liebe se ace al beay 5 coast. —— crassicornis................00000: Dredged in about 25 fathoms north of Holy Island. — mesembryanthemum .............. Common everywhere. Adamsia palliata ..........00.. eee eeee Frequent—always with Pagurus Prideauxit. Anthea cereus ............ sag Mecok te waite On Zostera marina, Lamlash Bay. Antennularia antennina ................ Near Fullarton’s Rock. Cellepora pumicosa The corals are generally diffused in deep wa- ramulosa } Serigeind Toco aeKae ter (from about 20 fathoms) outside of — Skenei Lamlash Bay. . Campanularia dumosa. Flustra foliacea. Halecium halecinum. Laomedea geniculata ...........+..-..- On stones and dead shells. Lepralia annulata ....-......eeeeeeees Ditto. —— hyalina ...........0..200020-0+- Ditto. eM AATUISIT 2 gi ale icizts p\ wie aveth-p wip taste’ a> Ditto. — Peachii ............ rs a ain, os ated Ditto. ——— HFISPINOSA oo ecco csc ees cc cscecs Ditto. — violacea, var. cruenta............-- On stones and dead shells in deep water, be- tween Holy Island and Clachland Point. Also between the south end of Holy Island and Fullarton’s Rock : several specimens. Plumularia pinnata ..........-....05. ...-Lamlash Bay. Salicornaria farciminoides .........-.....- Common, outside of Lamlash Bay. Sertularia tamarisca. The Committee have deemed it advisable, for the present, to omit the - following classes—Cirripedia, Annelida, Acalepha, and Poriphora ; also the Sessile-eyed Crustaceans; nor have they even attempted to search for the microscopic forms included in the Infusoria and Rhizopoda. E:2 52 REPORT—1856. Among the Nudibranchiata, a species of rare beauty was obtained when dredging in Brodick Bay, between Invercloy and Corriegills, in from 10 to 15 fathoms. As it could not be identified by the Committee, a sketch taken by Dr. Greville was forwarded to Mr. Alder, who replied,—* The beautiful Nudibranch you have found is a Lomanotus, and probably new; but of this we could not be certain without a careful examination, and I shall therefore be glad to avail myself of your kind offer to send the animalalive. I dredged a minute Lomanotus (only quarter of an inch long) in Lamlash Bay in 1846, which is figured in the 6th Part of our Monograph, under the name of L. flavidus. I think it can scarcely be the young of this large species*. Since the completion of our work, we have received from Mr. Thompson of Weymouth, a somewhat similar Lomanotus, white, with orange processes, and about an inch long. Yours differs from them in the length of the vela- filaments and the expansion at the posterior extremity, and also from the latter in the large size of the tentacular sheaths. The only British specimens of this new genus we have yet seen have been in a sickly state, and only one of each kind, so that any additional information concerning them is desirable. Perhaps if you should be dredging again in Lamlash Bay after the receipt of this you will be so good as to keep a look out for the small LZ. flavidus. It was dredged in shallow water among scallops, very near to the Holy Island. The only specimen of Doris planata yet found I also got there.” The Committee have to add, with deep regret, that this apparently new form of Lomanotus, having been placed for safety in the vivarium, has disap- peared, and, although the tank was emptied for a thorough search, no trace whatever could be found. Two unsuccessful attempts have since been made to secure another specimen by dredging in Brodick Bay. To conclude :—The result, in a general point of view, of the Committee’s present and previous researches, added to those of other parties, as far as they are known, is, that although Lamlash Bay contains many interesting forms, most of the rarer ones are so exceedingly scarce as to cause considerable disappoint- ment to the collector. The naturalist who wishes to secure a series of cabinet specimens, especially of shells, and to obtain a store of duplicates in return for his expenditure of time and money, must seek other localities. For example, with regard to the more interesting Mollusca inhabiting the Lami- narian zone and deeper water, Lima hians, with its curious nests, can alone be pronounced abundant. It may be obtained in any quantity. Pecten tigrinus comes next in order, but an entire day’s dredging, in the most favourable ground, would scarcely produce more than half-a-dozen good full-sized specimens. In the course of several days’ dredging this season, single specimens only of Lyonsia Norvegica and Pilidium fulvum were secured ; of the Eulimz, only two of Hudima polita and a solitary specimen of E. distorta; of Chemnitzia none; of Trichotropis borealis one; of Odos- tomié none; of Rissoe only the common species; of Mangelie, one of HM. Leufroyi, three of the rare M. teres, a few of the common M. linearis, and one of M. rufa, var. Ulideana; of Cylichne none, except two or three poor specimens of C. eylindracea ; of Philine none, except P. aperta. It is remarkable that species, which usually are not accounted at all scarce, are represented sparingly in this part of the Clyde district. Mr. Barlee, well known as one of the most practical conchologists and indefatigable dredgers in Great Britain, visited the Committee, and, having dredged over the best ground} for two days, came to the conclusion that Lamlash Bay is remark- ably deficient both in Molluscan forms generally and in the number of indi- * The species dredged by the Committee was 2 inches in length. tT That is, from Hamilton’s Rock, near Clachland Point, to the North and N.E. end of Holy Island, in from 35 to 15 fathoms. Also in the vicinity of Fullarton’s Rock. a ee ———— — C,CU CC ee ee DREDGING.—FRITH OF CLYDE. 53 viduals which actually exist there. Among the Echinodermata, the only species of any interest that is really abundant, in certain defined localities, is Comatula rosacea. Nor is Goniaster Templetoni unfrequent, that is, half- a-dozen examples may be procured in a successful day’s dredging. The same may be said of Uraster glacialis. More rarely brought up is Luidia Fragillissima, especially of full size. Professor Allman and his party did not succeed in finding more than one adult individual during two days’ dredging with the Committee. At the same time specimens measuring from 4 to 6 inches across are often seen at low water both at Lamlash and in Holy Island. Only one specimen of Palmipes membranaceus (immature) has been taken this season. And of the Holothuriade not ene has occurred except Chirodota digitata, of which two examples came up in the dredge, in from 15 to 6 fathoms, near the house on Holy Island. With respect to the Crustaceans, the rarer forms of Podophthalma are poorly repre- sented. Nor is there much to report of Zoophytes, for both Anthozoa and Polyzoa are remarkably deficient with the exception of a few of the com- monest kinds, and even some of those most generally distributed appear to be wanting altogether. In closing this necessarily meagre Report, the Committee take the oppor- tunity to make some observations on the expenditure connected with dredg- ing operations. Boats must of course be hired, with crews, according to circumstances. In some localities, a stout boat, with a couple of men, may get through some work in fine weather, and with a depth of water not ex- ceeding 10 or 12 fathoms. But if the dredge be constantly down the labour is severe, and the occasional assistance of the gentlemen, whose time ought to be otherwise employed, will be required. Four men are not too many, and, in some states of the weather, they are necessary. The charge for a boat and two men cannot be set down at less than from 5s. tc 6s. a day. At Lamlash the usual charge is 7s. 6d. For deep-sea dredging, and indeed for the examination generally of the more exposed parts of the Clyde, whether in shore or at a distance, a small sailing craft is indispensable—such as a common herring boat—with a crew of four men, the cost of which would be about £4 a week. This, Mr. Barlee—the Committee could not quote higher authority—has found to be quite efficient. With such a vessel having a boat in tow, dredging may be carried on when oars would be use- less. From the above statement of the absolute outlay inseparable from dredging operations when conducted on a useful scale (omitting altogether the cost of material, its wear and tear, and various contingent expenses), it will be evident that a grant of £10 will go but a short way in the hands of _an active Committee. On behalf of the Committee, CHARLES PopHam MILEs (Incumbent of St. Jude’s English Church, Holy Island, Lamlash Bay. Arran, N.B. Glasgow). August Ist, 1856. Report on Observations of Luminous Meteors, 1855-56. By the Rey. Bavrn Powsrtt, M.A., F.R.S. &c., Savilian Professor of Geometry in the University of Oxford. Sixce my last report to the British Association I have received but a very small number of communications of meteor observations, but among these will be found one or two of remarkable interest as presenting very peculiar features. I am chiefly indebted, as hitherto, to Mr. E. J. Lowe. REPORT—1856. Velocity of Appearance and duration. magnitude. Brightness and colour. Date. Hour. Train or sparks. —! 1853. | h m Sept. 30/11 15 ...... (G.M.T.) distance. 3 11 15 ....../Pear-shaped, =2 of|Lustre — like}....s-.seseeeseceversreeceneeees moon. Afterwards| quicksilver. burst at the lower part into a number of fragments which disappeared. 1855. Feb. 21/10 15 p.m.|About double of ¢.|White .........|None observed ............ (G.M.T.) Form doubtful. Aug. 11/11 30 p.m.|A bright light behind Rays proceed-|. the hills preceded] ing from it therisingofabright| on all sides, body like the full} not shooting moon. Gradually} out but stati- diminished to aj] onary. More small star. red than ?. Dec. 11] 8 10 p.m.|Round, well-defined, Intensely mE Disappeared very (Commence-| diam.=30’. bright, pale suddenly after 4 ment not ob- i secs. 1856. Jan. ground.) 7| 4 55 p.m.|Clear round disk, somewhat less than the moon. AGS Pill. c.c-ccenwececcencncscseves|ascsossccnvesemsse A bright vertical line emit-|After 5 minutes ting sparks brighter than} curved and wavin 4, for 10 minutes, then _ horizont and yanished. see eeseeneeee seeeeeee Left behind a “ column of; vapour.” seeeeeneee teeeeeseeee 4 55 p.m. Exploded at the end of a long slanting fiery train, which remained, length 5°. 455 p.m.|A ball of fire, burst/With a flash|A small white cloud, re- without noise. like light-| mained about 3 hour, ning. then vanished. A CATALOGUE OF OBSERVATIONS OF LUMINOUS METEORS, 55 - 2 Direction or altitude. General remarks. Place. Observer. Reference. —<—$«s — | Moving rapidly upwards to-|Atmosphere clear,/Balgrummo,near|/W. Swan, Esq. ..|Proceedings of the _ wards zenith. daytime. Leven, Fife- Royal Society of shire. Edinburgh, Mar. hs P 5, 1854. from N.E. to S.W. Altitude|No sound or explo-|Ditto ............ Mr. D. Wallace ./Ibid. azimuth determined after-| sion. lat.56°13/5/N., _ wards. long. 12" 2°6 W. “Meteor | APParent zenith) Azimuth. Appeared...) 70°37’ N. | 20°59’ E. Burst ...... 57° 40’ 7° 48’ Disappeared! 47° 30’ 10° 49’ kt middle of course azimuth S,|Atmosphere heavy,|Near Bellahous-|W. J. Macquorn|MS. communica- Alt. 45° (estimated by eye).| so as to conceal] ton, 23 miles} Rankine. tion. Course E. to W., nearly ho-| stars, and give] S.S.W from rizontal, wavering about 15°.| the meteorsane-| Observatory, bulous aspect. Glasgow. ow altitude, nearly S.W....... Many shooting|Tillington, near|Mrs. Ayling, and|MS. letter to Lord , stars during the] Petworth. friends. Wrottesley. time. 3 I. 20°. W. alt. 30°. Moving/Air calm. Below/1 mile S. of Edin-|Professor C.|MS. communica- | almost horizontally from E.| the clouds. See] burgh. Piazzi Smyth.| tion. _to W., slightly descending in-| App. No. 1. See Appendix, No. ‘clination about 7°, for about 1. 15°. A ; ro B22 tO!D0 4) DW OL 'S.e.e] occxcanseacvesasedbo ess Redhill, Reigate Mr. Carrington|Letter from Mr. is and Mr. Good.| Carrington. m mediately under h.........45- Sky very clear...... St. Thomas’s Hill/Mr. Masters .../Kentish Gazette. ie near Canter- See Appendix, bury. No. 2. Tout 30° .....s.sseeeeee seatuanoe [Ditto esemcaenseeees Stone near Ayles-|/Mrs. Smyth....,.|MS. See Appendix, | * bury. No. 4. adder vessserereererecee cess Seeveat|ccudecpeie sesveseveeeees(BONChurch ...... Miss Sewell......|MS. id haga. ~ 56 REPORT—1856. : Appearance Brightness : Velocity or Date. Hour. and magnitude. end ealour ges duration. 1856. | h m Jan. 7| 4 55p.m. |A ball of fire darted|/Extremely Leaving a brilliant fiery|..........0.. ccoccen dil down and suddenly, _ brilliant. train, gradually became disappeared. faint, and expanded in 5 minutes; appeared like a thin fleecy white cloud 4 55 p.m. |Shot downward a lit-|............0000e Left a bandoflightchanged|Through about 8° tle obliquely and through various forms] of space. ; exploded. (see diagram, Appendix, No. 3.) for 10 minutes. Also a progressive mo- ] tion through about 4° towards E. . 1 Luminous Meteors observed in 1855-56, | 1855. Sept. 4] 8 30 p.m.|=I1st mag.*.........+6 Red: coe cecaspans MD ALIE Ny dcy escanetekeceattecn es Rapid, duration 0°-2f SuO2 wateees == STON PA. Wiesranse ss Colourless ...|Streak ....00s.csccseseseeesses Instantaneous ....«0 8 50 ......)/=Ist mag.*....... seman COLOMPICRS go. | LEAL ten coat wee tas seb = spmertaer Instantaneous eo 7 MoO MSc ases For first half path =|Red ............ Atl bstaaeevacaves dest aasseeesse Slowly, duration 1 3rdmag.*, then gra- sec. 7 dually increased till =2nd mag.* OCH idl 67 05) sacwes Nd MAG oe. deesseee Wellow:. «dices: MBEAN Ui cctecsesieeoeene clontee Rapid’ ..ccesc.saeen ff TE We Bed eee About four times ap-|Bluish ......... Narrow streak, visible after|Motion rather slow, parent size of 4, meteor vanished. The} duration 3 secs. oval in form. streak was visible both sides, the break at the same time. 4d < re Noy. 8] 8 53 ......|2nd mag.* wi. seo YELLOW ...00000. A rainiiprss awsneseaeccs cocevoee[RADIG .cecsscoocnedl 30] 6 56 ...... Very large, somewhat! Aslight as day,|.....s.sssseeseeeesnees coraaatinde Lingered 2 secs. ... like a flash of light-| long sha- : ning dows cast. Dec. 6) 5 35 p.m.|=% .rrrecesesesseeeeeees Colourless, in-|Leaving a long streak of|Very rapid, dura creased in| light. tion 0°5 see brightness as it pro- gressed. 19] G13 am.J=—C ..rscccseversseoreeee Light as noon-|Streak left for a consider-|Duration fully 10 day. able time. minutes. 21| 4 50 ...... 4 times size of 4...... BITC hspodht ixoss A single ball with well-de-/Slow, duration 4 fined edges, no stream-| secs. | ers. d A CATALOGUE OF OBSERVATIONS OF LUMINOUS METEORS. 57 irection or altitude. General remarks. Place. Observer. Reference. i... Betas Monccbsccewcecnaves In daylight, sky|Hartley Rectory,/Rev. J. T. Plum-|MS. letter to Mrs. clear. Hants. mer. Bell. little W. of S., point of ex-|....c:.seeeeeseee svee[OXford ......0.208- A friend of Mr.|Letter from Mr. plosion about 22° alt. G. A. Rowell. | Rowell. See Ap- pendix, No. 3. y E. J. Lowe, Esq., F.R.A.S., F.G.S. | pm Polaris perpendic. down .|...... Saas neueeoeesnee obser”, Beeston |E. J. Lowe, Esq. Mr. Lowe’s MS. ted on W. edge of Galaxy,|....0c,.seerseeseseeeees PGs. teeters caeessn Wee asee eeeee kee Ibid. ing perpendic. down from ° below the altitude of Atair. H ee. Gown from CeN-]...c00..seseceseeeneeees Thid.......... scavellG. senccane Caeeees Ibid. e of Ursa Major. farted S. of Galaxy, 15° below].........seeceeees Ddesse Hbids. Sabre eS einen Idi pesesesuerses Ibid. Atair, moved downwards, through the Pleiades ...|.......-+...ssesseseeee Obser’, Beeston |E. J. Lowe, Esq.|Ibid. dat altitude of 80°, fall-/Star-like on the Nottingham Fo-|F. E. Swann, Esq.|Ibid. ig perpendic. down to with-| edges, when it) rest. in 10° of W.S.W. horizon. passed over half ; its track, it sud- denly disappear- ed, and almost immediately re- appeared 03° lower. This break was devoid of the streak, which re- mained after the meteor had va- ro nished. om below Polaris towards the}......... Pee Bee qanrsa|UIGsnsscacensecarasfhGs | ccasperscesssse Ibid. ast, downwards at an angle 4 ll downwards, bursting duel....... cccacsense see |[DId....eeeceeees .|An assistant to/Ibid. E. at an altitude of 45°. E. J. Lowe. Be Andromede, passing NS ree oulee'sWapdtenae << Obser’, Beeston jId. ........... .+.{Lbid. vy y Pegasi, vanished in- Rencouly. MEEMU sess caecvcsscesesscssccecens|resceescavencevacceseces Highfield House|E. J. Lowe, Esq.|/Ibid. See Appendix, q Observatery. No. 5. down in N.W. from an al-|Very bright......... Bulwell ......... G. Allcock, Jun.,|Ibid. ltude of 40°. Esq. 58 - REPORT—1856. Appearance and Brightness ‘ Velocity or | Dries pour. magnitude. and colour. a duration. | 1855. | hm Dec. 5)A large met|eor seen. f 4 6) 5 40 p.m. |=2nd mag.* ......... Bluish ......+0. Streaks. ..ccsvereseeease Rapid .......e000 11 p.m. till |Several small with |Colourless .../Train .......sses+...seseseeee Rapid ......000 e | 11 30 12|Many meteors .........ceeccecceseeccn[ececesesrenesaccer|teeettecscnensesteeeeccrsccssseas|seeeesseeaease tans one 11 22 pra Pndimagt......602 Colourless .../Long streak...............40. Rapid ........ ool 13/12 40a.m. |=2nd mag.* ......... Colourless ...j/Long streak ................0. Rapid ....... toes tl 12 45am: |=2nd mag.* ......... Colourless .../Long streak ......0.....00000. Rapid .........eefit 1856. > CEO 7A OI ICE 07 Gl enn Bes ene eS COOSEROCOReE: Honhel Cosocenceetac-oce cascada. ccseec| bi sarosetacs veocsmal | 7|A large metleor seen at Chelmsfor]d, cloudy here.|.........-+seeeseseeesecssseenee|aneeneccee tonnes vol 11) 7 15 p.m. [Small ......... Fepecnes Colourledyy (cc\se.ceesesciceescecgaes+seonceneas Rapid ........ ool 12|11 16 p.m. |=2ndmag.* ......... Red 4ittivas: Streake-vsssnsevtie eee. Slowly, duratio 7 secs. 27| °F Puts Ell |. cecsseesnsaene ses poss snsac|oanessccccvaoacsns|seessnecensonssadspeveveseonteuess|arcieeevnceseaane + oon 9 p.m. : | \12) S.acm. |=Ist mag-*...}.....02- Richi scarlet. 2. |(UVai” sc .sossepececessecedaes 2 secs., slowly... Feb. 2) 7 45 p.m. |=2nd mag.* ......... Colourléss: ».::|Train: sss hte eet Rapid <2... s¢eem E =3rd mag.* ' 3|7 55 p.m. |A splendid meteor ...|......... BAY Sigg) Hoc aoa acer depaber ae dnviscercpseyeccemteee Pree 7 55 p.m. |4 size of moon......... Green, (Oratipeiinesce: «04s Veer esudeseccenccustee Duration 2 secs’ andred, very rapid. brilliant. 7 13j\l- 7 30 + |=2nd mag.* |........ Blue......ospene] SIC wards at an ‘angle OLGA Nea crecete tc We acener ees MBGees Neecas ss. 55% Wenitctererscces re Ibid. sed 5° S. of Orion’s belt. s meteor, when first seen, green, then changed to nge, and then to red. ese changes took place denly without altering the of the meteor. d through Saturn, felll........... Batis cihes SLAs shock eae 1G Hear Peon cenee Ibid lown at an angle of 50° to- wards W. ndic. down in Cassiopeia.|.......2ssssessceseeeees Os PRBS oceeeee LGA racic Seeesne se [bid ontally towards N., passe).........sseeeseseeeeees TIDYleesascccepeasto: ASS Sec ccctscesnese [bid ough @& Cygni. towards N.W., passed].............0 Pecans U]orG LP aneseee areas QENS. canes s oases Ibid ough Gemini. m « Corone, passing 5° be-|..........sseeeeerseeees Tbid........0+..0... MGS ocnastea ease tbid w Arcturus. Like a spark. Ap acety very low. 60 : REPORT—1856. APPENDIX. No. i.—Extract from Prof. C. P. Smyth’s communication. (Meteor, Dec. 11, 1855.) “Tt was apparently below the clouds, for they were thick and compact cirrostrati in all that part of the sky, shutting out all the stars and reflecting the glare of distant iron-works; and the meteor showed no symptoms of shining through the cloudy medium, for it was well-defined. The clouds were such as have an altitude of four to five miles attributed to them, and have a very scattering effect-on rays of light passing through them, and must have been composed of frozen particles ; one or two stars were hazily seen through the clouds in the S. and S.W.” No. 2.—Meteor, Jan. 7, 1856. “ To the Editor of the Kentish Gazette. « Srr,—This evening, at a quarter before five o'clock, being at St. Thomas’s Hill, near Canterbury, I was struck by what appeared a rocket in brilliancy, but with sparks more compacted than usual. I ran to a position where no trees intercepted my sight, and was astonished to find a bright vertical line— [to appearance about 6 ft. long and 2 in. wide ] *—in the south, immediately under Saturn. «“ There was no cloud near it, or indeed, on the whole hemisphere at the time. Its brilliancy exceeded that of the planet, and it seemed to emit light in the manner of a gilded snake. “Tt continued about five minutes with this aspect, when its form began to change, and showed a bold curve in its centre, with a deflection at each ex- tremity ; at this time, a bright, waving, thread-like tail became visible, and very soon after a similar vermiform appearance in the opposite direction was to be seen at the top. As the body, so to speak, curved, so it appeared to become broader, and in about 10 minutes the general direction was changed, for it had lost its vertical direction, and was just acquiring a horizontal one. “ Tt was not till this time that its nature could be defined; but now it showed that it was a thin cloud, and it finally passed away without leaving a trace behind. “Tam, Sir, yours truly, 7th January, 1856. “ Wititiam Masters.” No. 3.—Diagram of meteor, January 7, 1855, accompanying Mr, Rowell’s letter. No. 4.— Extract of a letter from Mrs. Smyth. “ January 1855. “ On Monday the 7th instant, as I was returning homeward from the northward with a friend about a quarter before five o’clock p.m., my friend suddenly exclaimed, ‘ There is a rocket!’ pointing to the southward in the di- rection of the Chiltern Hills. She saw it explode at the lower end of a long and rather slanting fiery train. Be * The part in brackets is given as communicated. A CATALOGUE OF OBSERVATIONS OF LUMINOUS METEORS. 61 __ “ The sky being very clear, it was still bright day-light. Supposing it only a rocket, although a gigantic one, we resumed our conversation, but the sta- ~ tionary character of the train again attracted our attention, though we ascribed it chiefly to the stillness of the air, or not quite so oblique. After upwards of five minutes it gradually became less dense, as if the t fiery flakes or atoms receded from each other. Thenit gradually assumed the appearance of a series of very bright small clouds at sun-set, only the brightest side was turned to the eastward. _ Elevation of the phenomenon above the horizon at first about p _ 35°. Length of the train about 5°. When the train became dis- r _ membered it seemed to have risen higher in the atmosphere, by t?) ~ some 10°. , o Hf I regret much from the wrong impression, tHat I did not take more accurate notes of this very bright meteor, as it proved to be. No. 5.—Extract of a note from Mr. Lowe. “J beg to enclose you sketches and description of the remarkable meteor (No. 10 of the foregoing Catalogue) which was seen here on the 19th of De- cember 1855, at 6° 13™ a.m. . Cy ‘ “ The meteor was first seen in N.N.W., moving towards the W. Fig. 1 represents the appearance when at the brightest, at which time it more closely resembled a brilliant flash of lightning than a meteor ; the light, for the mo- _ ment it lasted, equaling that of day. When first seen it was not far distant _ from the position of H 17 Camelopardi, and moving downwards to midway be- tween Capella and py Persei. The size was about that of the apparent diameter ' of the moon. There was no noise of explosion heard. After the meteor _ itself had vanished, a belt of light, similar to that of a comet’s tail, was visible along the whole path of the meteor; this gradually became less bright, and after a short time the lower portion was curved towards the east. Fig.2 _ shows its first appearance, and fig. 3 when curved; later it assumed the form of fig. 4, and afterwards of fig. 5; when it nearly approached that of a cir- _ cular band ; the upper portion never moved its position in the heavens. Fi- nally, on breaking up the base of the circle disappeared first. It was visible fully ten minutes. A falling star of about the Ist magnitude crossed over the band horizontally from W. to E., starting near Capella and moving towards e Cassiopeiz. “The night was cloudless with a cutting E.S.E. wind. “E, J. Lowe.” F fc No. 6.—Extract of a note from Mr. Lowe. “ Observatory, Beeston near Nottingham, July 25, 1856. *« From the appearances presented in the several large meteors seen at the _ end of last and at the beginning of this year, it appears evident to me that 62 REPORT—1856. these bodies are not se/f-luminous. The light seems to be owing to the me- teor, instead of the light of the meteor ; probably the great speed causes a pe- culiar property of the upper regions to ignite, at the instant of ignition being ~ an intense blaze, and then subsiding into a phosphorescent fame, which may linger for a length of time and be wafted along by currents of air, as was the case in several instances. In the case of the meteor of Dec. 19, 1855, it moved over 183° in less than a second of time; it cannot therefore be supposed that the meteor itself could be within 5° of this path 10 minutes afterwards. Now if we suppose the meteor burst at this point (which to me seems improbable), it must have burst in a medium where light could shine, and if so it is as easy to suppose some substance should be ignited, as the meteor itself should blaze. The intense brightness is too great for reflected light. “EJ. Lows” Fig. 5. Photochemical Researches. By Professor Bunsen, of Heidelberg, and Dr. Henry E. Roscos, of London. We had the honour of laying before the Chemical Section of the British Association at the Glasgow Meeting, a short account of a series of experi- ments which we had undertaken with the view of becoming more nearl acquainted with the laws which regulate the chemical action of light, and of obtaining, if possible, a measure for this action. _ These experiments, the continuation of which las been assisted by a grant from the Association, have been extended during the present summer months, and we beg to lay before the meeting, in a short report, the chief results as yet obtained. The method employed by us for measuring the chemical action of light is founded upon the well-known fact that chlorine and hydrogen combine when exposed to light. The employment of this reaction as a measure of the chemical action of light was proposed and practically carried out by Dr. Draper of New York in 1844, to whom belongs the great credit of first having attempted to obtain a measure for this action. A number of experi- ments instituted for the purpose of testing the accuracy of the instrument proposed by Draper, assured us, however, that not only for observations extending over a considerable period of time, but even for those of short duration the indications of the instrument were not reliable. ‘The possibility of obtaining exact photometrical results with a mixture of chlorine and hy- drogen, depends upon the fulfilment of various conditions which in Draper’s tithonometer have not been regarded. Of these conditions the two most essential are— 1. The constant composition and purity of the gaseous mixture. 2. Constant pressure exerted upon the gas. It is easy to show from the laws of gas absorption that the method em- PHOTOCHEMICAL RESEARCHES. 63 _ ployed by Draper for evolving the sensitive gas never could have furnished it of constant composition. __ Draper's instrument consists of a siphon tube, of which one limb is short and closed, and the other longer, narrow and open at top. The long limb is furnished with a scale, the shorter one has two platinum wires melted into the glass near the bend. The whole of the short, and part of the long limb, is filled with hydrochloric acid saturated with chlorine, and by means of an electric current the acid can be decomposed and the gases collected in the short limb. According to Draper no gaseous chlorine is evolved during the electrolysis of hydrochloric acid; the hydrogen, however, set free at the negative pole passing through the liquid displaces some of the chlorine held in solution, and thus a sensitive gas is obtained and collected in the shorter siphon limb. The composition of this gas cannot, however, be constant, for according to the law of gas absorption, when a mixture of gases is collected over water, the free gas cannot possess a fixed composition before a certain relation between the volumes of the dissolved gases has been attained. Until this equilibrium has ensued, a continuous interchange between the volumes of free and dissolved gases must take place, and in the case of the tithono- meter this equilibrium is not even approached. Another more considerable source of error in Draper’s instrument lies in the difference of pressure to which the gas is subjected during the experiments, arising from the gradual fall of the liquid in the longer limb in proportion as the sensitive gas is acted upon by the light. Having assured ourselves that the indications of the tithonometer cannot be relied on, the necessity of obtaining an instrument in which the foregoing and many other essential conditions are fulfilled; beeame apparent. The first object therefore was to obtain a gas consisting of equal volumes of chlorine and hydrogen of constant composition. This object we attained (contrary to Draper's express statement) by the electrolysis of aqueous hydrochloric acid. Exact volumetric analysis convinced us that as soon as the acid is saturated with the two gases, in accordance with the laws of ab- sorption, the evolved gas consists exactly of equal volumes of chlorine and _ hydrogen, unaccompanied by oxides of chlorine, or hydrogen or other im- purities. After many fruitless attempts, we have at length constructed an apparatus in which the second, and all other required conditions are satisfied, _ and by means of which we have been enabled not only to obtain a relative, _ but even an absolute measure for the chemical action of light. _. This apparatus, represented in Pl. III., is constructed entirely of glass, and consists essentially of four parts: firstly, a tube (a) containing carbon or platinum poles fastened on platinum wires melted through the glass, serving for the electrolytic decomposition of the aqueous hydrochloric acid ; _ secondly, a set of bulbs for washing the gas, furnished with a glass stopcock for shutting off the supply of gas; thirdly, a small flattened giass bulb (c) _ containing water, in which the gas is exposed to the action of the light; and fourthly, a capillary tube (d) furnished with a millimetre scale, on which the _ diminution of volume caused by the absorption of the hydrochloric acid is - accurately observed by the advancing column of water. Each of these pieces is fitted air-tight into its place by ground-glass joints, so that no _ caoutchouc or other organic substance comes in contact with the sensitive gas. In this arrangement the pressure is rendered constant throughout the whole apparatus by raising or depressing the exit tube dipping into the bottle (e) filled with water, and by means of the horizontal absorption tube (d) the pressures before and after the experiment do not differ by two milli- _ metres of water. 64 REPORT—1856. A series of experiments conducted with lamp-light for the purpose of testing the accuracy of the instrument, gave the following results :— As soon as the atmospheric air has been completely expelled from the ap- paratus by the electrolytic gas, and the equilibrium between the amounts of gas absorbed by the water, and the free gas established, an action is observed on exposing the gas to the light. This action, however, does not commence immediately on exposure to the light ; a short time elapses before the absorp- tion of the water in the tube (d) begins, but this soon takes place, showing that the combination effected by the light in the vessel (¢) has commenced. This absorption becomes gradually quicker until a certain rapidity is at- tained, after which the action continues regular as long as the source of light remains constant. This peculiar phenomenon, to which we have given the name of Photochemical Induction, is one of great interest and import- ance, and as the study of this branch of the subject has occupied our par- ticular attention, the results obtained will be subsequently detailed. On passing more gas through the apparatus and again isolating the mixture, the same phenomenon is observed, with the difference, that the constant action is larger than in the former case, that is, the gaseous mixture has become more sensitive. In this way, by continuing to lead the gas evolved from successive portions of hydrochloric acid through the apparatus, the action brought about by a gas flame of the same dimensions increases regularly, until, after having continued the operation for several (from 12 to 18) hours, the amount of action effected by the flame remains constant. The apparatus has then attained its maximum degree of sensibility, and, as we shall show, always gives comparable results. Before this maximum action is attained, upwards of 5000 cub. cent. of gas must be passed through the apparatus, which contains only about 2 cub. cent. of water requiring saturation. Observations made with the apparatus thus prepared, showed that the light from a gas lamp concentrated by a lens produced always exactly the same amount of action on various days and with fresh gaseous mixtures evolved from different portions of acid. These experiments sutficed to show that our apparatus was capable of producing reliable and accurate results. We next determined the limits of concentration between which the hydrochloric acid can be used, and experiment showed that the amount of an- hydrous acid contained in solution must not diminish to 20 per cent., as the gas evolved from an acid of that concentration nolonger gives the maximum action. Having assured ourselves that the apparatus gave, under these circum- stances, comparable results, it became necessary to examine whether the heat evolved from the combination of the gases, and more especially the heat radiated from the source of light, had any appreciable effect upon the indications. By comparing the relative volumes of the vessel, in which the insolation takes place, and the absorption tube, it was found that a rise of less than 0°-04 Cent. in the mass of the gas would cause an expansion of 1 millimetre on the absorption tube. Hence the apparatus is not only a photometer, but also a very delicate air-thermometer. In order to prevent any of the rays of radiant heat from expanding the gas, the insolation-vessel was placed behind a double metallic screen furnished with a metallic cap fitting over the vessel. The rays of light fell on the gas through an opening ° in the screen filled by a layer of water contained between two plate-glass surfaces. By filling the apparatus with atmospheric air, it was proved that with this arrangement the source of light may be placed within a few inches of the gaseous mixture, without the radiant heat interfering in the least with the indications. ‘The sources of exterior error arising from radiant heat having been thus removed, it only remained to determine whether the heat eee? a> PHOTOCHEMICAL RESEARCHES. 65 evolved from the slow combustion of the chlorine and hydrogen exerted any perceptible action upon the instrument. On suddenly cutting off the light from the sensitive gas, the action is found not to cease immediately. This absorption, after the exclusion of the light, may be owing to three causes. 1. The combination of the gases may continue for a short time after the removal of the light. 2. The hydrochloric acid formed may not be instantaneously removed by solution in the water. 3. The decrease of volume may be produced from the whole gas cooling down, owing to the heat of combustion no longer being added to it. Experiments undertaken to determine which of these three suppositions was true, showed that this contraction could be almost completely accounted for, from the decrease of temperature of the gas, proving therefore that the first two assumptions were groundless. This contraction is so small that it does not in the least degree interfere with the accuracy of the observation. In order still more fully to test our apparatus, an arrangement was made by means of which a small jet of coal-gas could be brought within different measured distances of the sensitive mixture, and the amount of the decom- position effected measured. The results thus obtained showed most exactly that the chemical action varied inversely as the square of the distance from the source of light, proving that the chemical rays obey the same general law as the visible rays, and affording another evidence of the accuracy of the results obtained by this instrument. Observations made with this ar- rangement also showed that exactly the same action was effected by the flame, placed at the same distance, at different times extending over a period of one month. The amounts of action effected by the same flame on various days from the 12th to the 26th of June, were 13:99, 13°83, 13°76, 13°84. Photochemical Induction. Chemical affinity, or the force which causes different bodies to unite and form chemical compounds, is in every particular case a certain definitive, unalterable quantity, which like all other forces (and matter itself) can neither be created nor destroyed. Hence it is incorrect to say that, under certain circumstances, a body attains an affinity which under other circum- stances it loses. All that can be said in such a case is, that the body at one time follows the chemical attraction, and at another time is retarded by forces acting in an opposite direction. This opposite action may be con- ceived to be a resistance similar to that occurring in friction, or in the passage of’ electricity through conductors. This resistance is overcome when we facilitate the formation of a precipitate by agitation, or when che- mical action is brought about by increase of temperature, catalytic action, or insolation. The existence of such a resistance presupposes a certain com- bining power, which may be measured by the amount of combination caused by the unit of force in the unit space of time. The act by which this resistance is overcome, and the state reached in which combination takes place, we have called Chemical Induction. The laws which regulate the action of chemical affinity, when this resistance is fully eliminated, are as yet entirely unknown to us; and although the solution of this, the most important problem in our science, appears at present so far removed, it is at least desirable that facts should be found which may form starting-points in this new field of research. The interesting relations in which the phenomena of photochemical induction stand to these questions, have induced us to examine this part of the subject with particular attention. 1856. F 66 REPORT—1856. The circumstance that the combination of chlorine and hydrogen does not take place immediately on exposure to the light, was observed by Draper in 1844. This was explained by him on the supposition that the chlorine, by exposure to the light, was transformed into a permanent allotropic modi- fication which differed from ordinary chlorine by possessing greater com- bining power. We have convinced ourselves that this explanation of the phenomenon is incorrect, and have proved that it is connected with actions of a very peculiar nature which may be classed together under the term of Chemical Induction. A number of experiments made with both diffuse solar and lamp-light, with different mixtures and various masses of sensitive gas for the purpose of determining the inductive action, showed that the times which elapse until the action begins, and until the maximum action is attained, are very different. We therefore next proceeded to examine the various causes which might influence the amount of the induction. First, the relation between the inductive action and the mass of the gas; secondly, the effect produced on the inductive action by variation of the amount of light, with a constant volume of gas; thirdly, the effect produced on the inductive action by allowing the gas to remain in the dark; and fourthly, the action of small quantities of foreign gases upon the induction. Experiments carried on with the view of answering the first of these questions, showed that the inductive action, or the transition of the gas from the inactive to the active state, was retarded by increase of the mass of gas. A larger volume of gas had to be insolated for a longer time than a smaller volume before the maximum action ensued. The influence of the amount of light on the rate of the inductive action was proved to be very great. The time required for induction diminished with increase of the amount of light, and in a quicker proportion than the increase of light. On allowing a sensitive mixture, which had already been insolated, and had attained its maximum action, to stand for some time in the dark, it was found that upon readmission of light the action did not begin again immedi- ately, but a new induction was necessary before the maximum action was attained. Hence the change effected upon the gas by the light is not a per- manent one, for after the light is withdrawn, the gas returns to its original inactive state, and requires as long an insolation before the maximum action is again reached as in the case with the original gas. This fact is of itself sufficient to disprove Draper's statement that this active condition of the gas when once brought about by the action of light is permanent. We have also convinced ourselves by experiment, that the supposition of a non-per- manent allotropic modification of either gas as an explanation of this phe- nomenon is untenable. ‘The gases evolved by the electrolysis of hydrochloric acid were collected separately, and after each gas had separately traversed a tube which could be exposed to direct solar rays, the gases were allowed to mix, and were then passed into the apparatus. On examining the action of lamp-light on the mixture, no difference in the rapidity of the action could be perceived between the sensitive gas, the constituents of which had been separately exposed to direct sunlight, and that which had not been previously insolated. From these experiments it is seen that the explanation of the phenomenon of photochemical induction is not to be sought in any allotropic modification of either gas. The effect produced by the presence of small traces of foreign gases upon the induction is very remarkable. We have found that the sensibility of the gaseous mixture depends entirely upon the absence of every trace of = i ee PHOTOCHEMICAL RESEARCHES. 67 foreign gas. The retarding action of oxygen upon the. mixture is the most marked ; the addition of one per cent. of this gas to the chlorine and hydro- gen mixture reduced the amount of action to 25th; and the presence of a mere trace of this gas (probably not more than ,,,;th per cent.) diminished the action to one half of the normal amount. Excess of either chlorine or hydrogen was found to act in the same manner, but not to sucha remarkable extent. ‘This retarding action of oxygen accounts for the very great length of time which it is necessary to lead the gas through the apparatus before the maximum action is attained. The diminution of the sensibility of the chlorine and hydrogen mixture when foreign gases are present, gives a very accurate measure of the cata- lytic action effected by such gases. The simple relations which exist between the amount of hydrochloric acid formed by the action of the light and the time of exposure, and amount of light, were first observed by Draper. We have confirmed his results in this respect, and have proved that both laws hold good for diffuse solar as well as for lamp-light. The relations are the following :— 1. The amount of chemical action effected by a constant source of light is directly proportional to the time of exposure. 2. The amount of chemical action effected by the light in equal times, is directly proportional to the amount of light. These laws are of course only applicable when the phenomena of induction have been fully eliminated.) A third relation which we have established is, that the amount of chemical action varies inversely as the square of the di- stance between the source of light and the sensitive mixture. The experimental difficulties which accompany the examination of the relations existing between the amount of action and the mass of the gas, are of so peculiar and considerable a nature, that although we have been occu- pied for more than a month upon this branch of the subject, we have not as yet succeeded in arriving at the law which regulates the action. We have, however, already proved that after the light has passed through a certain depth of the gas, it is no longer capable of causing a combination to take place ; and we have further proved that the depth at which the light ceases to act upon the mixture is very different for light from various sources. Differences in this respect have not only been found in light from different sources, but the diffuse solar light reflected from a perfectly cloudless sky is found to differ, not only in the quantity, but also in the quality of the chemi- cal rays according to the sun’s altitude. These interesting observations are not complete, but the results as yet obtained give promise of further import- ant relations being established between the nature and amount of the chemical rays falling upon the earth’s surface at various periods of the day. Reduction of the Chemical Action of Light to an Absolute Measure. The difficulty of obtaining any constant terrestrial source of light threw great obstacles in the way of reducing the chemical action of light to an absolute measure. The normal source of light which we have chosen for the calibration of our instrument (fig. 1), is a flame of pure carbonic oxide gas streaming from a large (3 millims in diameter) platinum burner, and issuing under a constant pressure of half a millimetre of water. By measuring the volumes of gas burned by different-sized flames and observing the chemical action produced, it was found that even with the homogenous flame of carbonic oxide, the chemical action increases in a greater ratio than the volume of gas burned. This relation between the action produced and the volume of F2 68 REPORT—1856. gas burned, we have determined by accurate experiment, so that between certain limits we can calculate the amount of action produced by burning the unit volume of gas issuing at a given rate. We call the unit amount of action for any instrument that produced by burning a cubic millimetre of carbonic oxide at the distance of one millimetre from the sensitive gas, issuing under the above-mentioned circumstances. The interesting relations of the reflexion, absorption, and polarization of the chemical rays, we hope to have the honour of laying before the Section on a future occasion. Heidelberg, August 5th, 1856. On the Trigonometry of the Parabola, and the Geometrical Origin of Logarithms. By the Rev. James Boorn, LL.D., F.R.S. &c. {A Communication ordered to be printed among the Reports. ] WHEN engaged, some years ago, in researches on the geometrical properties of elliptic integrals, the results of which appeared in two memoirs printed in the Philosophical Transactions for 1852 and 1854, I was led to discuss a par- ticular case of a cardinal theorem in the theory of elliptic integrals. Cer- tainly no discovery was anticipated in matters so long known and thoroughly investigated as the theory of logarithms and the properties of the parabola. The propositions I now bring before the Section are, I believe, entirely new; and as they open a field of research in a department of geometrical science studied by every mathematician in the course of his reading, I thought the discussion of them might not prove unacceptable to the Mathematical Section of the British Association. SEcTION I. I. Let the angles w, ¢, and y, which we shall call conjugate amplitudes, be connected by the equation tanw=tangsecx+tanysecg?. . . . . « « (1) Hence w is such a function of ¢ and x as will render tan[¢, x]=tan psec y+ tan x sec 9. We must adopt some appropriate notation to represent this function. Let the function [¢, x] be written ¢+x, so that tan (¢+ x)= tan ¢ sec x + tan x sec d. This equation must be taken as the definition of the function ¢+ x. . In like manner we may represent by tan (¢--x) the expression tan @ sec y— tan x sec @. From (1) we obtain sec w=sec($+y)=sec psecy+tangtany. . . . » (2) If we now differentiate the equation tan w= tan ¢sec y+ tan x sec ¢, we shall have diy - sec a= q sec g sec y+ dx tang tan x | cos w cos @ cos x pas. 4, ie Pakage eve ke —— tan ¢ tan sec ¢ sec i cos’ Rie cos x Pi DEO Shr ~« mete. a ON THE TRIGONOMETRY OF THE PARABOLA. 69 Adding these expressions together, and introducing the relation established in (2), we find dw do dx —SS=] — ————_ ——. . . . e . 5 COS w cos g * cos x (5) This is the differential equation which connects the amplitudes w, ¢, and x. As w, ¢, and x are supposed to vanish together, we shall have by integration, dw _ | do dy |. {= =(26+4 26: a. Oa or in the more compact notation, fsec w du={ sec g dp+f sec x dy. Parr Oe ae feel fF so Hence if w, ¢, and y are connected by the relation assumed in (1), we shall have the simple relation between the integrals expressed in (5). II. If in (1) we make the following imaginary substitutions, that is to say, put Vv¥—J sing for tang, “—1sin@ for tany, 7 —] sin y for tan w, cos @ for sec ¢, cos B for sec x, cos y for secw, and change + into + and + into —, we shall have sin y= sin (a+/()=sin a cos 6+ sin G cos a, the well- known expression for the sine of the sum of two arcs of a circle. We shall show presently that an arc of a parabola measured from the vertex may be expressed by the integral fseco dd, @ being the angle which the normal to the are at its other extremity makes with the axis, or the angle between the normals drawn to the arc at its extremities. + and + may be called logarithmic plus and minus. As examples of the analogy which exists between the trigonometry of the parabola and that of the circle, the following expressions in parallel columns are given ; premising that the formule marked by corresponding letters may be derived singly, one from the other, by the help of the preceding imaginary transformations. In applying the imaginary transformations, or while tan ¢ is changed into 4 —1 sin ¢, sec ¢ into cos ¢, and cot ¢ into — /—1 cosec ¢, + must be changed into +, and + into —; as also fsec gd ¢ into ¢V —1t. The reader who has not proceeded beyond the elements of trigonometry may assume the fundamental formula as proved. He will find little else that requires more than a knowledge of plane trigonometry. * The relation between the conjugate amplitudes w, , and y, was originally obtained in this way. In the theory of elliptic integrals, any three conjugate amplitudes are connected by the equation : cos w= cos cos y— singsiny V1—#sin?o ..... zis called the modulus. When we make i=0, we get cos w= cos ¢cosy—singsiny or w=¢+y in the trigonometry of the circle. When we take the complement of 0, or make <=1, we get : sec w= sec @ sec y-++ tan ¢ tan y or w=9o+y in the trigonometry of the parabola. Whence, as above, tan w= tan¢ sec y+ tan yx sec ¢. + I hardly need to remind the advanced reader, that this is the imaginary transformation by which we are enabled, in elliptic functions of the third order, to pass from the circular form to the Togarithmic forma, or to pass from the properties of a curve described on the sur- face of a sphere to its analogue described on the surface of a paraboloid of revolution. See the author’s paper “‘ On the Geometrical Properties of Elliptic Integrals,” in the Philosphical Transactions for 1852, pp. 362, 368, and for 1854, p. 53. : REPORT—1856. 70 e . . . . X us —$ us =(X—¢) us (X+ 4) urs X—¢ pue X+¢ aq sopnyzydue ay} yorT 6g 800 + [=$¢ S00 G Pea ot ses | hd DE tee (ob us + $ 800) =9z us + T . . . . . . . ° (i—)/z La 2 32 we ee oe 1-6-9 1-9? = uis =) o-9+ yp ja 2800 p uey —I bug =¢z ur} ‘ wis —¢ .s09 =$z 809 > ‘hsoo ¢ us Z=%z UIs X=$ yo] X avy $ uey + J A ae Ape acing =(X—$) ur} X wey > uey— Pre joe Samer aq sapnyydure oy} 40" fat foes aoe paper! fi we * [1—(¢+¢) v0s=¢ ,0R} g (v) Set ie {fo ue} [— +6 rast =(¢+-¢) ary Ey at pees. =buy——3 = a0s dp doas ee teal” op do0s f-9 + op 000s f? b.uis + T () see eee WG See ee SD eee, ! ipo Gt ees aaa =($-+$%) UIs (qe st ee ace Be BE ate oes eae 2 Sc “eee: “p ,uvy + 008 =($-- >) das “boas > ur} G=(9-+ 4%) uey X= oT Xarts $ us — | Owes. a koe San oaee ee ee X us uls + [ (2) «Ja Ta ee eee ee “ag Eo ute. =(X+¢) uls ‘X ue $ uey FX oas 6 008 =(X+ F) o08 -$ aas X uvy —X oas ¢ uey =(X-—+¢) urey -h aas X ue, +X oas 6 uey = (XG) wey ‘II “mjoqoing ayy fo hujamouobrs 7 pavieile: s ON THE TRIGONOMETRY OF THE PARABOLA. 71 ; Since sec(¢-+-¢)=sec’¢+ tan’ ¢, and tan (¢+¢)=2 tan ¢ sec ¢, sec (+4) + tan (¢-+o)=(sec ¢-+ tan ¢). sec (p--g-+4)=sec (¢+9) sec p+ tan (p+) tan @, tan (p+ ¢+¢)=tan ($9) sec p+ sec (#9) tan ¢, it follows that sec (p+ 9+4)-+ tan (p-+9-+4)=(see p+ tan 9)’, and so on to any number of angles. Hence sec (d--o-+¢... to mG) +tan(~+9o+¢... to nd)=(secpt tang)”. (6) Introduce into the last expression the imaginary transformation tan ¢= W=1 sing, Again, as and and we get Demoivre’s imaginary theorem for the circle, cos no + / —1 sinnd= {cos 6+ WV —1 sin g}”. This is a particular case of the more general theorem sec (a@+B+y+d+ &.)+tan(a+B+y+s+ &e.) =(sec a+ tan a)(sec B+ tan B)(sec y+ tan y)(sec 6+ tan 0) &c.* In the circle, ae , an i isan a PESTA OS PO NOE Accordingly, in the parabola, ka Meanie py ae Melee g) "| (aa) 1—/ Ising _ 1—7 —1 tan(¢+4¢) 2sin 2p—sin 4 | Fein 99-+sin 4g PENT 82. . ED 2tan (¢-+¢)+tan (¢+o+¢+¢) (66) cos 26=cos‘g—sin*g, . - - « + « « (ce) Tn the circle, tan’ ¢ = hence in the parabola, sin’¢= In the circle, hence in the parabola, sec(¢+¢)=sec*g—tan*g@. . . - « «= (yy) In the circle, ( jain ( ) 2 tan? a —- Si(gtx) sin (=x) . : tan? ¢—tan? y = ae doteb 2 - (dd) therefore in parabolic trigonometry, =k Mae tees Bs (g+x) tan ($+) sin o—sin’? yx = dec aiee" encase 7" Tn the circle, dei 1—cos 26 tan ¢ = coy Shh oe ore ? 1+ cos 2¢ (ee) * Hence cos (w+B+y+d+ &c.)+ / —1 sin (2+B+y+6+ &c.) =(cos «++ »/ =I sin «)(cos B+ “—1 sin B)(cos y+ / —1 sin y)(cosd-+-4/ —I1 sin 0) &ce 92 REPORT—1856. Accordingly, in the trigonometry of the parabola, see (pg) +1 (ee) sing = If sin ¢ __ sin (—x) (fe ids ke ae oe Ce tan sin(yx—W)’ it is easily shown that tan ¢, tan x, and tan y are in harmonic progression. Hence it follows in parabolic trigonometry, that if tan p __ tan(+x) 0 ge Se a Sel sin , sin x, and sin y are in harmonic progression. Let © be conjugate to ~ and w, while w, as before, is conjugate to and xy. Then we shall have tana=tan(¢+y+y), or tan (¢+yx+y)=tan ¢ sec x sec y+ tan x sec psec ¢ +tanysecgsecy+tangtanytanb . . « « « « (@) sec (++ y)=sec ¢ sec x sec p+ sec ¢ tan x tan p +secytanwtand+secwtangtany. . ... +. + (p) and ‘ Ercan — sing+siny+sin y+ sin ¢ sin y sin p : a ay ¥) 1+sinx sin + sin Wsin 6+sing siny’ i 7 whence in the trigonometry of the circle, sin (¢+x+wW)=sin ¢ cos y cos p+ sin y cos f cos p +sin cos¢cosy—singsinysiny. . . . . « « + (p) cos (++ )= cos ¢ cos x cos P— cos ¢ sin y sin —cos x sinsing—cosysingsiny. »« . . - « « (r) 1). tan p+ tan x + tan ~—tan ¢ tan y tan 2 tan (p+x+¥) ]—tany tany— tan yp tang— tang tany (s) We have here a remarkable illustration of that fertile principle of duality which may be developed to such an extent in every department of pure ma- thematical science. The angle ¢+@ may be called the duplicate of the angle ¢, the angle o+¢+¢ the triplicate, and the angle (¢-+-¢@ to n terms) the n-plicate of the angle ¢. The reader will observe that in this paper the signs + and + connect the angular magnitudes of the parabola, while numerical quantities are connected by+and—. Thus in the circle, we have ¢+y and a+ indifferently, while in the parabola we must use the notation ¢+y or ¢+yx, but a+b or a—b, as in the circle. —_— » ON THE TRIGONOMETRY OF THE PARABOLA. 73 Section II. IV. An expression for the length of a curve in terms of a perpendicular p let fall from a fixed point on a tangent to it, and making the angle @ with a line passing through the given point or pole, is found in most elementary works, namely s=(pdd +t. In the following figure, p=ST, 9=VST, ¢=PT. Fig. 1. Let II(m.6) denote the length of the arc of a parabola whose parameter is 4m, measured from the vertex to a point at which the tangent to the are is inclined to the ordinate of that point to the axis by the angle 6. When m=1, the symbol becomes II(6). In the parabola whose equation is y’=4z, the focus S is taken as the pole, and therefore p=m sec 0: while PT, or =m sec 6 tan 0. The are of a parabola, measured from the vertex, may therefore be ex- pressed by the formula : II(m . 0)=m sec 0 tan 0+m {sec 0 d6. - The difference between the are and its subtangent ¢ may be called the tangential difference. For brevity, and for a reason which will presently be shown, the distance between the focus and the vertex of a parabola will be called its modulus. Hence the parameter of a parabola is equal to four times its modulus. V. Let I(m.w), M(m.@), I(m.x) denote three parabolic ares VD, VB VC, measured from the vertex V of the parabola. Let, moreover, w, ¢, and x be conjugate amplitudes. Then II(m.w)=m tan w sec w-+m{ see wdw ee eS ee ee I1(m .¢) =m tan $ see p-+mJ sec g dp ( ay ea 7) 1(m.x)=m tan x sex +m) sce x dy | Whence, since fsec w dw = [sec odo + {sec xx, because w, ¢, and x are conjugate amplitudes, we get, after some reductions, TI(m .o)—T(m .¢)—I(m.x)=2m tan wtangtany. . . (8) 74 oe REPORT—1856. : It is not difficult to show that tan w sec w— tan ¢ sec @— tan y sec y= 2 tan w tan ¢ tan y. Substitute for tanw, secw, their values given in (1) and (2). Write (sec? ¢—tan* @) and (sec? x— tan’) for 1, the coefficient of tan ¢ sec o and tan ap hee x in the preceding expression, and we shall obtain the foregoing result. VI. Let y, y', y" be the ordinates on the axis of the parabola of the ex- tremities of the arcs I(m.w), I(m.@), and I(m.x). Then y=2m tan ow, ' !,,! y'=2mtan¢, y!=2mtany. Therefore 2m tan w tan ¢ tan y = wt. m We have therefore the following theorem :— The algebraic sum of the three conjugate arcs of a parabola, measured Srom the vertex, is equal to the product of the ordinates of their extremities divided by the square of the semiparamefer. To exemplify the preceding theorem. Let ] 5 tan w=2, tan ¢=>> tan y= a V5 h 3 i secw= V5, Be ie var” sag Sake and these values satisfy the fundamental equation of condition, tan w= tan ¢ sec y+ tan y sec ¢. Now 2 x TI(m .w)=m2” 5+mlog (2+ V5) 11 (m.9) = m+ mlog( 1+ vs) 4 2 _ I(n.y)=m 3V5 + mlog(® J . Hence, since log (2+ “5)=log (iad + log & ay, we shall have II(m.w)—Il(m.¢)—U(m.x)=mV5; .. +» ~ (9) and mV 5=2m tan w tan p tan x. VII. If we call an arc measured from the vertex of a parabola an apsidal are, to distinguish it from an are taken anywhere along the parabola, the pre- ceding theorem will enable us to express an are of a parabola, taken any- where along the curve, as the sum or difference of an apsidal are and a right line. Thus, let VCD be a parabola, S its focus, and V its vertex. Let f,,it VB=[(m.¢), VC=0(m.x), VD=(m.w), and let 274 =h. Then (8) shows that the parabolic are (VC + VB)=are VD—A;; and the parabolic are VD—VB=BD=VC +A. VIII. When the ares U(m . ¢) and II (m.x) together constitute a focal are, or an are whose chord passes through the focus, ¢+y= zs and h is the ordi- nate of the are VD. Accordingly we derive the following theorem :— Any focal are of a parabola is equal to the difference between the conjugate apsidal arc and its ordinate. itp oe fo FRE BE RS a OS OO ON THE TRIGONOMETRY OF THE PARABOLA. 75, Fig. 2. The relation between the amplitudes 0=(§ = and w in this case is given by the equation sin ogas S008 ®-, Thus when the focal chord makes — COS w an angle of 30° with the axis, we get cosw=4, or y= 10m. Here, therefore, the ordinate of the conjugate arc is ten times the modulus. IX. When $= x; (8) is changed into Il(m.w)—21(m.¢)=2mtanwtan’d; . + + + (10) or as tan w=2 tan ¢ sec ¢, see (n) of IIL, I(m.w)—21(m.g)=4m tan? psecg. + + + + (11) Let ¢=45, then m(m.=) is the arc of the parabola intercepted between the vertex and the focal ordinate; and as sec w=sec (¢+9)=see"¢ + tan’¢, we shall have, since tan¢=1 and sec ¢= V2, secw=3; therefore II(m .sec~!. 3)—on(m.") =4am V2. Now as sec w=3, tan w=2 WG, and the ordinate Y=4m W2, we may there- fore conclude that the parabolic arc, whose ordinate is 4m /2, diminished by this ordinate, is equal to the arcs of the parabola between the focal ordinate produced both ways, and the vertex. X. It is easy to give an independent proof of this particular case without the help of the preceding theory. The length of the parabolic are whose amplitude is 45° will be found by the usual formula to be n(m.F) =mV2+mlog (1+ ¥2)5 76 REPORT—1856. and twice this arc is om(m.=-) =m2V2+mlog (3+2V2); since (1+ V2)?=34+2V2, The parabolie are whose amplitude is sec—! 3, is found in like manner to be II(m.sec-!3)=m3 .2V2 + mlog (3+ ¥2). Subtracting the former equation from the latter, I(m. seo"13)—211(m. =) —AmW 2. Now the ordinate Y of the parabolic are whose amplitude is sec—!3 is equal to Qn 2V9=4mV 2, Hheretore Il(m .sec—!3)—2II (m =) =Y. It is easily shown that 4m 2 is the radius of curvature of the extremity of the arc whose amplitude is 45°. XI. To find a parabolic are which shall differ from twice another parabolic arc by an algebraic quantity, may be thus exemplified. Let tan ¢=2, tanw=4 5, sec o= V5, secw=9, then II(m .sec-! 9) =m36 WV 5+mlog (9+ 45) 211 (m tan-! 2)=2m 275+mlog (2+ V5). Consequently, since (2+ V5y=9+4V 5, II(m . sec—! 9) —21I(m. tan-!2)=m32 VW 5=2m tan wtan?¢. . (12) XII. We may in all cases represent by a simple geometrical construction the ordinates of the conjugate parabolic ares, whose amplitudes are ¢, x, and w. Let BC be a parabola whose focus is S and whose vertex is V. Let Fig. 3. D een B \ VS=m; moreover, let VB be the are whose amplitude is ¢, and VC the are ON THE TRIGONOMETRY OF THE PARABOLA. q7 whose amplitude is x. At the points V, B, C draw tangents to the parabola; they will form a triangle circumscribing the parabola, whose sides represent the semi-ordinates of the conjugate ares VB, VC, VD. XIII. We know that the circle circumscribing this triangle passes through the focus of the parabola. Now VT=mtan¢, VWT'=mtany, T'A=mtangsecy, TA=m tan xsec¢; hence T'A+TA=m<(tan ¢ sec y+ tan x sec 9), therefore mtanw=T'A+TA. When VB, VC together constitute a focal arc, the angle TAT! is a right angle. The diameter of this circle is m sec ¢ sec x. The demonstration of these properties follows obviously from the figure. XIV. It may be convenient, by a simple geometrical illustration, to show the magnitude of the functions sec (6+) and tan (¢+ x). - Let SV=m, ASV=y, BSV=4, the line AB being at right angles to SV. Through the three points ABS describe a circle. Draw the diameter SC, and join the point C with A and B. Let fall the perpendicular CT. Fig. 4. Then msec (6+ ,)=SC+CT, and m tan (6+ y)=AC+CB. Moreover also it follows, since sec (¢+)+ tan (¢+y)=(sec¢+ tan ¢) (sec x + tanx), as has been established in (6) of (IIL.), that m(SC+CT+AC+CB)=(SB+BV)(AS+AV). . . (13) Of this theorem it is easy to give an independent geometrical demonstration. We have manifestly also CT(SC-+m+SA+SB)=(AC+AT)(BC+BT). . . (14) XV. Let © be the conjugate amplitude of w and yf, while w is the conjugate amplitude, as before, of ¢ and xy. Then as fsec @ da=Jsee w dw +fsec Wd, and Ssec w dw={ sec odo +f see x, dx, 78 REPORT—1856. we shall have fsecwda=f sec $ dp+(sec x dy+{sec pad; eh elk bey! and if II(m.), O(m.@), I(m.x), and I(m.w) are four conjugate para- bolic arcs, I(m.o) —(m.¢)—(m.x) —T(m Wp) = 2mtan(p+x)tan(~+yp)tan(x+y),. - + . (16) which gives a simple relation between four conjugate parabolic arcs*. When there are five parabolic ares, whose normal angles ¢, x, , v, Q are related as above, namely o=gty, O=alp=gryty, N=Pryt bey we may proceed to obtain in like manner a formula which will connect five parabolic arcs, whose amplitudes are connected by the given law. XVI. To exemplify the foregoing formula. Let us assume the following arithmetical values for the angles w, ¢, x, ~:— -_ 10+4V5 1 V5 4: tan o= ee’, tan ¢= tan x= ; taney 3 sec os v5 sec p= US, sec y= > sec p= a Hence n(m -tan~" 5) = m™ 5.4 mlog (C22) 2 4 2 (m.tan%5) = m3 5 + mlog(3+¥5) (17) - H(m.tan-"2) = mom log 3. J * This latter theorem may be proved as follows :—Since @ is conjugate to w and w, we shall have by (8), Il(m.6)—I(m. w) —TI(m.i)=2 m tan o tan w tan p ; and since w is conjugate to @ and x, Il(m.w)—IIl(m.p)—I1(m. x) =2 mtan w tan ¢ tan y. Hence, adding these equations, II(m.w) will disappear, and I(m.6)—I(m.¢)—T(m. x) — I (m. VW) =2m tan w[tan o tan W-+ tan ¢ tan y]. Now tan ©= tan (w+). ) Therefore tan o = tan w sec p+ tan wW sec w. But tan w= tan ¢ sec y+ tan x sec ¢. Substituting this value in the preceding equation, and multiplying by tan y, tan @ tan P= tan ¢ sec y sec Ptan p+ tan x sec ¢ sec W tan p + sec ¢ sec y tan? P+ tan ¢ tan y tan? yp, ~—s— and ' tan ¢ tan y= sec? tan ¢ tan y—tan? yf tan ¢ tan x. Consequently tan & tan y+ tan ¢ tan y= (sec p tan $+ sec ¢ tan W)(sec x tan p+ sec yp tan x) = tan (¢+y) tan (x+y), and w=9+x, a oe be 5 * 8 v ON THE TRIGONOMETRY OF THE PARABOLA. 79 Now adding the three latter equations together, and subtracting the sum from the former, the logarithms disappear, for log (14.72) + 10 alae) a8 seca bats pee >) | SES. IP Sie Se Aen ORE am Emory ere 0) consequently I(m.w)—I(m.¢)—I(m.%)—(m. p) — m(160+73V5\ —9m.9. (St4Y5\(1245 V5). mn (OEY S) = 2m (Here (He); cas) cbs since tan(@+y)=2, tan(g+p)= , and tan (y+y~)= l ae v5 XVII. Let, in the preceding formula Cissy ¢=x=¥, and we shall have II(m.@)—3I1(m .¢)=2m tan*(¢+ ~)=16m tan’ ¢ sec* ¢. We are thus enabled to assign the difference between an arc of a parabola whose amplitude is w=(¢-+¢--@) and three times another are. If in (@) (III.) we make g=y=vV, tano=4tan?¢+3tang. . ... . - (20) Introduce into this expression the imaginary transformation tan ¢= / —1 sin 0, change + into +, and we shall get sin 30=—4 sin*0+3sin 0, which is the known formula for the trisection of a circular are. (20) may therefore be taken as the formula which gives the trisection of an are of a parabola. XVUI. The following illustration of the triplication of the are of a para- bola may be given :— Take the ares whose ordinates Y and y are 4m and m respectively. Let @ and ¢ be the amplitudes which correspond to these ordinates ; then as Y=2mtano=4m, tano=2, secco=V5; and as l aie y=2m tan =m, tan P= g? sec g= 5 Now these values of tan w and tan ¢ satisfy the equation of condition (20), namely 4 tan’ ¢+3 tan ¢=tan wo. But II(m. tan—! 2)=m2 V5 +mlog (2+ V5), and 1 15 14/75 II -1—)—,y—-" 2? sea EC (m. tan 5 =m5 a +m.log( 2 ) and three times this arc is ait(m -tan-! 2) = m= V5 +mlog(2+ V5), si PNG ee i (445) 04 v5. Subtracting this latter equation from the former, the logarithms disappear, and we get II(m.tan-12)—3I1 (m. tan-} 1) = = m5 7S —16m tan’ sec’ ¢. . (21) 80 REPORT—1856. Now as the radius of curvature R is equal to the cube of the normal divided ma 5 4 by the square of the semiparameter, R= » since N= 2msecw. We have therefore the following theorem : The are of the parabola whose ordinate is equal to 4m, or to the abscissa, diminished by the radius of curvature of its extremity, is equal to three times the are whose ordinate is m, or one-fourth that of the former are. It is evident that the chord of the greater arc is inclined by an angle of 45 to the axis, or the ordinate is equal to the abscissa, while in the lesser arc the ordinate is four times the abscissa. This is the point on the parabola up to which the ordinate is greater than the abscissa; beyond this point it is less than the abscissa. XIX. Another example of the triplication of the are of a parabola, or of finding an are, which, diminished by an algebraic quantity, shall be equal to three times another are, may be given. Let 3 . tan ¢= oe tan w=18, sec o= W138 es Ia > sec o=5V 13. These values satisfy the equation of condition, 4 tan* +3 tan @=tan o. Hence stad = I(m.tan-!.18)=m90. V13+m log (18+5” 13) 11(m.tan-3 3) =n ivi +m oa and three times this are is W183 = 3m(m.tan-15) =" i +mlog (18+5”13), since (8+"18)_is+5vi8. Therefore subtracting the latter equation from the former, : wy. od WIS. lees > TI(m. tan '18)—sm1(m. tan S)= mS51V15 —16m(5 =H . (22) XX. To find the are of a parabola which shall differ from m times a given arc by an algebraic quantity, may be thus investigated :— Let be the amplitude of the given arc, then Tl(m.¢)=m sec ¢ tan +m log (sec ¢+tan 6), and times this are is nil(m.¢)=nm sec > tan o+m log (sec + tan )”. Let ¢+9¢+9+¢ to m terms=®, then Il(m.&)=msec & tan +m log (sec ®+tan ©). a DED ie wa ON THE TRIGONOMETRY OF THE PARABOLA. 81 Now sec & + tan b=(sec $+ tan ¢)", as shown in (6). Hence I(m.&)—nII(m .¢)=m[sec & tan 6—n sec ¢ tan ¢]. Let sec ¢+tan ¢=A, then sec d+ tan =)", and -1 —}-—l1 sec g= At ) tan g= > x . : n - Soke ye We have also sec ®= “ tan d= ae Hence II(m.&)—nII(m.¢)=m oe » » (23) 3 5 Let n=3, tan 1=> sec ae A=2. Then I(m.&)—3II(m. o=2 (2 =). When n=4, 5 «38.457 | gio” and so may be taken any other integral number. II(m.&)—41I(m.¢)= m XXI. The equation (20) affords a very simple mode of expressing the real root of a cubic equation. Let the cubic equation under the giey form be 2°+pe=q. tan 4: Let the parabolic equation tan® o+2 tan w= be written 3m? m3 tan? ~— tan w= — tanQ | w+ re w rh 9 hence 3 p= im’, q= "7 tan. Now since the value of # found by the ordinary methods is =/t4./Z 4 o ey a OR: = /P4£ we shall have 2a=m /secOQ+ tanQ—m V/secQ—tanQ, . . . (24) m2 \/®: mons Ly /3. = P When the sign of p is negative, the solution must be sought in the trigo- nometry of the circle. and 4 Section III. On the Geometrical Oriyin of Logarithms. 5 XXII. In the trigonometry of the circle we find the formula * 3 5 i Stn $— S08 4 BES _tan'd + Be. tear AE ro ay 9 1856. G 82 cuabwenlasG. And if we develope by common division the expression = oot ae 5 es 6(1+ sin? 6+ sin* 6+ sin°@+ &c.), and integrate, ane hie ee ue ={sccado=sin g.sin Be sin’ 0 — 9 we, bec mtb) cos 3 5 if If we now inquire what, in the circle, is the magnitude of the érigonome- trical tangent of the are which differs from its subtangent, by the distance between the vertex and its focus; or, as the subtangent is O in the circle, and the focus is the centre, the question may be changed into this other, what is the trigonometrical tangent of the are of a circle which is equal in length to the radius? This question would be answered by putting 1 for $ in (a), and reverting the series ; 1= tan (1)— ol) ag ae ay + OG. Ts, ates Ce) 3 5 7 By this process we should get, in functions of the numbers of Bernoulli, the value cf tan (1), as is shown in most treatises on trigonometry. Let us now make a like inquiry in the case of the parabola, and ask what is the value of the subtangent of the amplitude which will give the difference between the are of the parabola and this subtangent equal to the distance between the focus and the vertex of the parabola. Now if 0 be this angle, we must have (m.@)—msec@tand=m. But in general, as shown in IV., [I(m .6)—m sec 6 tan =m { sec 6 dd. We must therefore have, in this case, fsec @dd=1. If we now revert the series (b), putting 1 for fsec 0 d0, we shall get from this particular value of ; iy ae oe the series, namely f= siniaat sin? @ sin’ é m sin’ 0 +£ Res ee tas 3 5 7 1 = an arithmetical value for sin @*. This we shall find to be sin 0=© =§ i e e+e being the number called the base of the Napierian logarithms. Hence sec 0+ tan0=€;; or if we write e for this particular value of 6 to distinguish it from every other, sece + tan e=€=2'718281828, &c.. . . . . (25) We are thus (for the first time, it is believed) put in possession of the geometrical origin of that quantity so familiarly known to mathematicians— the Napierian base. From the above equations we may derive 1 -1 —p- seve =E TE st oda eee A or tan e= 1175201192, whence e=*8657606, or e=49° 36! 49". * As l+a\ _ x Le i! tog (72) <2 (et 4+ 54545 8): w= sin, then : Te 'sin 6\ 5 /_- sins@ sin'@ = sin70_— sin? “y log (Ee) =2(sin + = + : jeg &e.) 2 (5) =e, or (* =m mel e, Hence see +tan 0e&e, 1— sin9 cos : { nn ald i ‘ 3 4 P : to TS. This line will touch the para- ON THE TRIGONOMETRY OF THE PARABOLA. 83 The corresponding are of the parabola will be given by the following series :-— nl By 1 9} 98 gQ° & e —y4 — —__— —————_ WC. Bee) m| + j93 + ja3a5 + 1934607 } since the subtangent in this case is equal to m sece tan e= es (e?—e-?). XXIII. If we now extend this inquiry, and ask what is the magnitude of the amplitude of the are of the parabola which shall render the difference between this parabolic are and its subtangent equal to z times the distance between the focus and the vertex, we shall have, as before, by the terms of the question, II(m .6)—m sec 6 tan 06=nm. But, in general, Il(m .0)—m sec 6 tan 6=m {sec 6dé; hence we must have : n= fsec 6 d8= log (sec 0+ tan 6), or sec 6+ tan 0=e”. Now we may solve this equation in two ways; either by making 7 a given number, and then determine the value of sec @+ tan @, which may be called the base; or we may assign an arbitrary value to sec@+tan@, and then derive the value of x. Taking the latter course, let, for example, sec 04+ tan 6=10, then n=log 10; or putting d for this angle, see3+tand=10. . ... . + (27) Hence as every number whose logarithm is to be exhibited must be put under the form sec 6+ tan 0, which is of the form 1+2a, since the limiting value of see @ is 1, we discover the reason why in developing the logarithm of a number, the number itself must be put under the form 1+2, and not simply under that of 2. XXIV. Given a number to find its logarithm, may be exhibited by the fol- lowing geometrical construction :— Fig. 5. Let SVP be a parabola. Through. the focus S draw the perpendicular SQ to the axis VS. Through V let a tan- gent of indefinite length be drawn, which may be called the scalar. On this tangent take the line VN to represent the given number. Join NS, and make the angle NST always equal to the angle NSQ. Draw TP at right angles bola in the point P, and the are of the parabola VP diminished by the sub- tangent PT, or the éangential difference for the are VP, will be the logarithm of VN. The line SN makes the angle (F+5) with the axis of the parabola. ; When SN'=VS= the unit m, the angle N’SQ is equal to half a right angle. Hence the point T in this case will coincide with V. The parabolic are therefore vanishes, or the logarithm of | is 0. When sec 6+ tan@=1, - 6=0. When the number is less than 1, the point N will fall below N’ in the position x. Hence nSQ is greater than half a right angle. Therefore T will fall below the axis in the point T’; and if we draw through T’ a tangent i G2 R4 REPORT—1856. T'p, it will give the negative are of the parabola T’p, corresponding to the number Vz. Fractional numbers, or numbers between +1 and 0, must therefore be represented by the expression m(sec@—tan@), since tan 0 changes its sign. When the number is 0, 2 coincides with V, and the angle NSQ in this case is a right angle. Therefore the point T’ will be the intersection of VT’ and SQ. Hence T’ is at an infinite distance below the axis, and therefore the logarithm of +0 is —o. Hence the tangential difference due to the amplitude 0, is the logarithm of the number sec 0 + tan 6. Consequently it follows that negative numbers have no logarithms, at least no real ones; and imaginary ones can only be educed by the transformation so often referred to, and this leads us to seek them among the properties of the circle. For as 6 always lies between O and a right angle, or between 0 and the half of +7, sec 0+ tan 0 is always positive; therefore negative num- bers can have no real or parabolic logarithms, but they may have imaginary or circular logarithms ; for in the expression log feos $+ /—IsinS}=S$V—1, . . . « + (28) we may make $=(2n+1)z, and we shall get log(—1)=(2n+1)rV —1. Hence also, as the length of the parabolic are TP, without reference to the sign, depends solely on the amplitude 9, it follows that the logarithm of , sec @— tan @ is equal to the logarithm of sec@+tan@. We may accordingly infer that the logarithm of any number is equal to the logarithm of its reci- procal, with the sign changed, since (sec + tan @) (sec @—tan0)=1. When @ is very large, sec 0+ tan 0=2 tan @ nearly. It follows, therefore, if we represent a large number by an ordinate of a parabola whose focal distance to the vertex is 1, the difference between the corresponding are and its subtangent will represent its logarithm. Sinee VT + TP = arc VP, therefore VT > are VP—TP > log VN. Hence VT or tan 6 is always greater than the logarithm of (sec @+tan @) in the Napierian system of logarithms. This may be shown on other principles : thus ——__——-- =. awe sin? ® + cos? 2. +2sin$ cos S 1+tang sec 0+ tan 0= 7 om 2 é 9 a). tae ag sed cos? 8 — sin? 2 1-— tan? 2 2 2 | 6 | Let tang =u. Then 3 5 vf log (sec 0+ tan 0)=log (7 **) =2( w+ ~ te = = = &e, ), 2 tan 2. and tan @=———_=2(u+u+w>+u'+ &c.). 1 —tan’— ) 2 Hence tan 6 > log (sec 0 + tan 0), —n-} P or = is always greater than the logarithm of x. ON THE TRIGONOMETRY OF THE PARABOLA. 85 XXV. Let {sec 9 dp=p, Sseex dx= 9; then as {sec w dw ={ sec dp+{ sec y dy, see (5), fsecwdu=p+q, and w=9¢+ x. Hence if ¢ be the amplitude which gives the tangential difference =p, and x the amplitude which gives the tangential difference =g, ¢+x is the am- plitude which will give the tangential difference =p+g. In the same way we might show, that if ~ be the angle which gives this difference =r, (¢+ +1) is the angie which will give this difference =p+q+r. Let @ be the amplitude of the number A, and p its logarithm; / the amplitude of the number B, and g its logarithm; 7 the amplitude of the number C, and ¢ its logarithm. Then A=seca+tana, B=secfh+tanf, C=secy+tany, and log A=p, log B=q, log C=r, or ptqtr= log A+log B+log C. We have also ABC=(sec a+ tan a)(sec + tan B)(sec y+ tan y) =sec(a+/j+y)+tan(atPp-+y). Now as p is the logarithm of seca+ tana, g the logarithm of sec 8+ tan 6, r the logarithm of sec y+ tan y, pt+q+tr is the log of sec(a+6+y)+ tan(a+f+y), or of ABC, as shown above. We may therefore conclude that log (ABC)=log A+log B+logC.. . . «. + (29) XXVI. If e be the angle which gives the difference between the parabolic are and its subtangent equal to m, (e+e) is the angle which will give this difference equal to 2m, (e+e+e) is the angle which will give this difference equal to 3m, and so on to any number of angles. Hence, in the circle, if 3 be the angle which gives the circular are equal to the radius, 25 is the angle which will give an are equal to twice the radius, and so on for any number of angles. This is of course self-evident in the case of the circle, but it is instructive to point out the complete analogy which holds in the trigonome- tries of the circle and of the parabola. ‘Hence the amplitude which gives the difference between the parabolic are and its subtangent equal to the semiparameter is given by the simple equation Recep tae eC SIE Le ry, eo) And more generally, if e” be the amplitude which gives the difference between the parabolic are and its subtangent equal to 2 times the modulus, we shall haye ReGics+ tania 67s, bs Say Lr SS (SR) In the same way it may be shown that if «, be the angle which gives the difference between the parabolic are and its subtangent equal to “th part the modulus, we shall have L sece,+tane,=e€". . . . + - « + (32) Let the difference be equal to one-half the modulus, then n=2, and sec e,+ tan ee. 86 REPORT—1856. : This is easily shown. Let e,te,=e. Then sec(e,+e,)=sec e=sec’e,+ tan’e,, and tan (e,e,)= tan e=2 sec ¢, tan e,. Therefore sec (e,e,)+ tan (e,+e,)=sec e+ tane=e= sec” e,+ tan” e,+ 2 sec e, tan e,=(sec e,+ tan e,)”. Hence BEN Bc ohn. te set a ae (ie. ga ee ; a | 1 —1 Since fanem@ © secem CHE” , 2 p12 2 —2 tan(e+e)=€ ta » sec (e+e)= ore, et+e-3 ‘ “9 ? e’—e-3 tan(etete)= iil sec(etete)= sens nm n —n tan (ee to m terms)= oe cue sec (e+e to m terms)= Therefore 2 sec c tane=tan (e+e) 2sec (e+e) tan (e+e)=tan (e+e+e+e), and generally - 2sec(e+e+ tom terms) tan(e+e-— to nm terms)= tan (e+e+e+e+ to 2n terms). Now 2sec(e+e-+ to m terms) tan(e+e+ to m terms) is the portion of the tangent to the curve intercepted between the axis of the parabola and the point of contact whose amplitude, or the angle it makes with the ordinate is (e+e to m terms), while tan(e+e+e+e+ to 2n terms) is half the ordi- nate of that point of the curve whose amplitude is (e+¢e+e-+e to 2 terms). Hence we derive this very general theorem :— That if two points be taken on a parabola such that the intercept of the tangent to the one between the point of contact and the axis shall be equal to one-half the ordinate to the other, the amplitudes of the two points will be (e+e+ to m terms) and (e+e+e+e to 2n terms) respectively. This theorem suggests a simple method of graphically finding a parabolic are whose amplitude shall be the duplicate of the amplitude of a given are. Let P be the point on the parabola whose amplitude is given. Draw the tangent PQ meeting the axis inQ. Erect VT at the vertex =PQ. Through T draw the tangent TP’, the amplitude of the are VP’ will be the duplicate of the amplitude of the are VP, or (06+ to m terms) and (0+6-+ to 2n terms) will be the amplitudes of VP and VP’ respectively. We may there- fore conclude that in the circle 2 cos(0+6+4 to z terms) sin(0+6+ to 2 terms)= sin(0+0+0+6 to 2n terms). XXVII. In the trigonometry of the circle, the sine of the are, which is z times the radius, is given by the formula 3 se x e a *— 10 + Tosa ~ 1934567 and the cosine of the same are by the formula rg a ag 12 + 1934 — 193456 sin 2=a2— &e., cos x=1— | | ON THE TRIGONOMETRY OF THE PARABOLA. 87 This suggests the analogous theorem, that if £ be the angle or amplitude which gives the difference between the parabolic are and its subtangent, or the tangential difference equal to x times the modulus, or the distance of the focus from the vertex, we shall have 2 2 x’ t = = me abet, is anb=a«-+ 753 + 19346 + jasase7 © and le” a Bue i ug ial eae 34, sees=1 +75 + 934 + jasase “° But (Lacroix, ‘ Traité du Calcul Différentiel et du Calcul Intégral,’ vol. iii. p- 442) the first of these two series is equivalent to - r r “2 xz o(i+F)(1+ze)(1+ ga) (14 wee) & and the latter to 4a? 4a? 42” je = }{ 1 +. —s, }, &e. ( F a hetse ( +e) ifence bay 2 2 2 a tanE=e (: i =)(1+ as)(1+ 55)(1+ rm) : 2 2 2 sec e=(1 4: =) +. 5a)(1+ a=: , &. When 2 is small, tané=z. Let the angle & be divided into an indefinitely v& large number ~ of parts, so that = = 1< a ee ee Then n sis 2 2 sec— =], tan-—-=-; n n and as sec (a+a+a+ ton terms)+ tan (a+a+a-+ ton terms)=(seca+tan a)” see £+ tané= (1 + a but sec §+ tan =e". Hence when z is indefinitely large, x n (: + a) =e’. (-i)me- nr These theorems, given in Price’s ‘ Treatise on the Infinitesimal Calculus,’ iy 5 p. 32, are the limiting cases of the very general theorem established in (6). XXVIII. To represent the decimal or any other system of logarithms by parabola. _ The parabola which is to give the Napierian system of logarithms being. drawn, whose vertical focal distance m is assumed as the arithmetical unit, let another confocal parabola be described having its axis coincident with the former, and such that its vertical focal distance shall be m'. The numbers being set off, as before, on the scalar, which is a tangent to the Napierian parabola at its vertex, the differences between the similar parabolic arcs and fn like manner, 88 REPORT—1856. their subtangents in the two parabolas will give the logarithms in the two systems, of the same number drawn upon the scalar ; for as all parabolas, like circles, are similar figures, and these are confocal and similarly placed, any line drawn through their common focus will cut the curves in the same angle, and cut off proportional segments. Hence the two triangles SPT and Sar are similar, and the tangential differences PV —PT and a@v—qr are propor- tional to 4m and 4m', the parameters of the parabolas. Fig. 6. pe Let log denote the Napierian logarithm, and Log the decimal logarithm of the same number. Draw the line ST, making the angle e with the axis such that sece + tan e=€. Then as PV—PT: av—azr::m:m', and PY—PT=m= 1, since € is the base of the Napierian system; and wv—ar=Log € on the decimal parabola, therefore m:Logé::m:m!, or m'=Log e. We may therefore conclude that the modulus of the decimal system is the decimal logarithm of the Napierian base e. Draw the line ST/ making with the axis an angle 0,suchthatsecé+tand=10. Now PV—PT!: w'v—a'e!::m:m': but P'V—PT'=m log 10, hence a'v—a'r'=m' log 10. Now in order that 10 may be a base, or in other words, in order that its loga- rithm may be unity, we must have a!v—a'r'=m! log 10=m; or if m=1, we must have m! log 10=1, or m/= that is, the parameter of the Deci- 1 log 10 : mal parabola must be reduced compared with that of the Napierian parabola ‘ ee — ON THE FRIGONOMETRY OF THE PARABOLA. 89 in the ratio of log 10:1. Hence, as is well known, the modulus m! of the decimal system is the reciprocal of the Napierian logarithm of 10. It is therefore obvious, that as any number of systems of logarithms may be represented by the differences between the similar arcs and their subtangents of as many confocal parabolas, the logarithms of the same number in these different systems will be to one another simply as the magnitudes of the para- bolas whose arcs represent them, that is, as the parameters of these parabolas. Accordingly the moduli of these several systems are represented by the halves of the semiparameters of the several parabolas. The Napierian parabola differs from the decimal and other parabolas in this, that the focal distance of its vertex is taken as the arithmetical unit, and that the scalar line on which the numbers are set off is a tangent to it at its vertex. Hence if m, the vertical focal distance of the Napierian parabola, be taken as 1, the vertical focal distance m! of the decimal parabola is .4342 &c., or if m=1, m= . 4342 &e. XXIX. In every system of logarithms whatever, the logarithm of 1 is 0. For when the point T coincides with V, the corresponding point 7 will coin- cide with v, whatever be the magnitude of its modulus m!. It is obvious that the circle whose radius is unity is analogous to the parabola whose vertical focal distance is unity, and that the Napierian logarithms have the same analogy to trigonometrical lines computed from a radius equal to unity, which any other system of logarithms has to trigonometrical lines computed from a radius 7. As we may represent different systems of trigonometry by a series of concentric circles whose radii are 1, 7, 7! &c., so we may in like manner exhibit as many systems of logarithms by a series of confocal parabolas whose focal distances or moduli are 1, m!, m'' &c. The modulus in the trigonometry of the parabola corresponds with the radius in the trigonometry ‘of the circle. But while the base in the trigonometry of the parabola is real, in the circle it is imaginary. In the parabola, the angle of the base is given by the equation sec@+tan@=e. In the circle, cos0+ /—1 sin6=¢9v-1; and making 0=1, we get eos (1)+ /—Tsin(1)=ev. 2 2S... (85) Hence, while e' is the parabolic base, ev— is the circular base. Or as [sec e+ tan e] is the Napierian base; [cos(1)+ /—1 sin(1)] is the circular or imaginary base. Thus [eos (1) + “”—1 sin (1)]9=cos $+ /—1 sin. We may therefore infer, speaking more precisely, that imaginary numbers have real logarithms, but an imaginary base. We may always pass from the real logarithms of the parabola to the imaginary logarithms of the circle by changing tan 6 into /—Tsin §, sec @ into cos 9, and e! into ev—. As in the parabola the angle @ is non-periodie, its limit being 37, while in the circle 3 has ro limit, it follows that while a number can have only one real or parabolic logarithm, it may have innumerable imaginary or circular logarithms. Along the scalar, which is a tangent to the Napierian parabola at its vertex, as in the preceding figure, draw, measured from the vertex, a series of lines in geometrical progression, m(secO+tan 6), m(secO+tan 6)’, m(sec@+ tan 0)*....m(sec 0+ tan 0)”, Join N, the general representative of the extremities of these right lines, with the focus S. Erect the perpendicular SQ, and make the angle NST always 90 ; REPORT—1856. equal to the angle NSQ. The line ST will be =m see 6, the line ST, =m sec (0+6), the line ST,, =msec (6+0+0), &c., and we shall likewise have VT=mtan6, VT,;=mtan(0+0), VT,=mtan(0+6+6), &e. This follows immediately from (6) of III.; for any integral power of (secO+tan@) may be exhibited as a linear function of sec @+ tan 9, writing © for 0+0+46.,.. &c., since sec (0+0+0+6 &. to n9)+tan(d+0+6+0 &e. to n@)=(sec 0+ tan 0)”. Hence the parabola enables us to give a graphical construction for the angle (8+0-+06 &c,) as the circle does for the angle (0+6+6 &c.). . XXX. The analogous theorem in the circle may be developed as fol- lows: In the circle-‘SBA take the ares AB=BB,=B,B,,=B,, By, ... &e. =28. Let the diameter be D; then SB=Dcos$, SB,=Decos23, SB,=Dcos39 .., &c., and AB=Dsin3, AB,=Dsin28, AB,=Dsin39.,, &c. Now as the lines in the second group are always at right angles to those in the first, and as such a change is denoted by the symbol “—1, we get SB+BA=Dj{cos 3+ ¥—isin 9}, SB,+B,A=D{cos 23+ /—Tsin 25}=D{eos $+ /—I[sin $}; SB, +B,A=D{cos 39+ V—1 sin 39} =Df eos $+ V—1sin9}° &e. SB,+B,A=D[cosa$+ “J sin n¥]=D[cos $+ 7 —1 sin 3)” When the points B!, B!' fall below the line SA, the angle 6 becomes negative, and we get SB!—B'A=cos3— V —1sin$ SB! —B" A= cos 28— W —1 sin 29= [cos $— VW —1 sin $]*. Therefore waits ar log (SB+ BA)=log (cos $+ Vv —] sin3)=3V —1. se Benes) Let $=1, then oii Oe log [eos (1) + VW —1 sin (1)]= 1 th Hence generally 3” —1 is the logarithm of the bent line whose extremities are at S and A, and which meets the circle in the point B, ASB=3. It is singular that the imaginary formule in trigonometry have long been discovered, while the corresponding real expressions have escaped notice. Indeed it was long ago observed by Bernoulli, Lambert, and by others—the remark has been repeated in almost every treatise on the subject since— that the ordinates of an equilateral hyperbola might be expressed by real exponentials, whose exponents are sectors of the hyperbola; but the analogy, being illusory, never led to any useful results. And the analogy was illusory from this; that it so happens the length and area of a circle are expressed by the same function, while the area of an equilateral hyperbola is a function of an are of a parabola, as will be shown further on. The true analogue of the circle is the parabola. hr. nate fs a; bs E ao ON THE TRIGONOMETRY OF THE PARABOLA. 91 Fig. 7. XXXI. There are some curious analogies between the parabola and the circle, considered under this point of view. In the parabola, the points Ee, Tp which divide the lines m(sec 0+ tan 6), m[sec(@+6)+ tan (0+6)] into their component parts, are upon tangents to the parabola. The corre- sponding points B, B,, B,, in the circle are on the circumference of the circle. In the parabola, the extremities of the lines (sec 0+ tan 0) are on a right line VT; in the circle, the extremities of the bent lines are all in the point A. - The analogy between the expressions for parabolic and circular ares will be seen by putting the expressions under the following forms :— Parabolic are — log (sec 0+ tan 0) — subtangent =O, Circular are + log (cos 8+ / —1 sin 0)”-1— subtangent =0. . (37) The locus of the point T, the intersections of the tangents to the parabola with the perpendiculars from the focus, is a right line ; or in other words, while one end of a subtangent rests on the parabola, the other end rests on a right line. So in the circle; while one end of the subtangent rests on the circle, the other end rests on a cardioide, whose diameter is equal to that of the circle, and whose cusp is at S. SPA is the cardioide. The length of the tangent VN to any point N is m(sec 0+ tan 0)=2m tan6, when 0 is very large. ‘The length of the cardioide is 2D sin 3. - XXXII. The radius vector of a circle whose radius is 7, drawn from any point on the circumference, and making the angle @ with a diameter drawn through this point, is given by the equation p=2r cos @, and since the coinciding per- pendicular from this point as focus on a tangent to a parabola is p=m sec 0, it follows that pp=2mr, a constant quantity. Hence the curves are polar reciprocals one of the other. The circumference of the circle passes through the focus of the parabola. - The centre of the circle is the pole of the directrix of the parabola. _ As the extremities N of all the numbers measured along the sealar are on a right line VN, the reciprocals of these points will all pass through the point A, the pole of the scalar VN. 92 * REPORT—1856. The point @ on the circle is the pole of the tangent PT to the parabola, and the point P on the parabola is the pole of the tangent ar to the circle. As the parabolic are VP—PT is the logarithm of the number VN, so the circular are Aq is the logarithm of the bent line Aa+as. Fig. 8. The locus of the point 7, the foot of the perpendicular from S on the tan- gent to the circle at a, is a cardioide whose cusp is at S, and whose diameter is that of the circle. While the circle is the polar reciprocal of the parabola, the cardioide is its inverse curve; for the cusp polar equation of the cardioide isp=2r(1+ cos@), 2m 1+ cos 9° Since the parabola and the circle are reciprocal polars one of the other, the circumference of the circle passing through the focus of the parabola, we have been able by the help of this reciprocal circle to give geometrical repre- sentations, as in XII. and XIV., of the properties of the trigonometry of the parabola. There is this further analogy between the properties of the circle and tite of the parabola,—that as the are which is equal to the radius subtends no exact submultiple of any number of right angles, however large, so in the parabola the angle or amplitude which gives the tangential difference or logarithm equal to the modulus is incommensurable with any number of right angles. In the former there are 206265 seconds, in the latter there are 178575 seconds*. The theorem given above, that a parabola is the reciprocal polar of a circle whose circumference passes through its focus, suggests a transformation which will exhibit a much closer analogy between the formule for the recti- fication of the parabola and the circle, than when the centre of the latter curve is taken as the origin. XXXIII. Let SBA bea semicircle ; let the origin be placed at S; let the angle * Tt is worthy of investigation to ascertain whether any relation can be found between the angle or arc (1), and the angle e which gives the tangential difference equal to the mo- dulus in the parabola. while the focal equation of the parabola is p= hence pp,= 4. — i” A. ‘ON THE TRIGONOMETRY OF THE PARABOLA. 93 ‘ASB=8; and let D, as before, be the diameter of the circle. Through B draw the tangent BP; let fall on this tangent the perpendicular SP=p, and let BP, the subtangent, be equal to ¢. Now as p=D cos’ $, and ¢=D sin $ cos 4, as also the angle ASP=28, if we apply to the circle the formula for rectification in IV., we shall have the arc AB=s=2Dfcos’Sd3—DsinSeoss. . . . - (88) The subtangent to the circle, which is exhibited in this formula, disappears in the actual process of integration; while in the parabola, the subtangent which is involved in the differential is evolved by the process of integration. As in the parabola, the perpendicular from the focus on the tangent bisects the angle between the radius vector and the axis of the curve; so in the circle, the radius vector SB drawn from the extremity of the diameter, bisects the angle between the perpendicular SP and the diameter SA. It is easily seen that while the line SB makes the angle @ with the axis, the line SP makes the angle 26, and the perpendicular SR on the tangent to the cardioide makes the angle 36 with the axis. Hence if we take the reciprocal polar of the cardioide, the line drawn per- pendicular to the tangent at any point on the curve trisects the angle between the axis and this radius vector. Consequently the polar reciprocal of the cardioide is a curve, such that if a point be taken anywhere on the curve, and a perpendicular be drawn to the tangent at this point, it will trisect the angle between the axis and the radius vector drawn to the point of con- tact. Hence the reciprocal polar of the cardioide enables us to trisect an angle, in the same way as a parabola gives us the means to bisect it. XXXIV. To determine the tangential equation* of the reciprocal polar of the cardioide. The radius vector u of the cardioide being connected with the polar angle 6 by the equation «=r(1+ cos 0), and p being the perpendicular on the tangent of its polar reciprocal, we shall have =F (1 + cos @). 1 20 See Let p= = then as cos 02=pé and ; =VWP+77, andy being the tangential coordinates of the curve, we shafl have pe eee i Re whl Consequently (+?) —pEP—P(P+v)=0. . » . - « - (39) is the tangential equation of the reciprocal polar of the cardioide. ‘The common equation of the cardioide, the cusp being the pole, is [(e+y)—re)?—r'(a?+y*)=0. . . . . . (40) The reader will observe, that the equation between the coordinates 2 and y of the cardioide is exactly the same as the equation between the tangential coordinates & and v of the reciprocal polar of the cardioide. XXXV. The quadrature of the hyperbola depends on the rectification of the parabola. Through a point P on the parabola draw a line PQ parallel to the axis and terminated in the vertical tangent to the parabola at R. Take the line RQ always equal to the normal at P, the locus of Q is an equilateral hyper- bola. For z=2m sec g, and as before y=2m tan ¢, therefore r—yY= 4m’, > ee ° ° e é . (41 ) * Tangential coordinates, p. 70. 94 REPORT—1856, the equation of an equilateral-hyperbola whose centre is at V, the vertex of the parabola, and whose transverse axis is the parameter of the parabola. The area of this curve, the elements being taken parallel to the axis, or the area between the curve and the vertical axis passing through V, is found by integrating the value of ady. Now x=2m sec ¢, and y=2m tan ¢, therefore Sady= 4m? \sec® pdp=2Qm [ m sec ¢ tan ptm {sec ) d¢ |. But it has been shown in IV. that II(m .)=m sec @ tan ptm {sec ¢ do. Hence the hyperbolic area VAQR=2mII(m.@). . « « + + (42) Therefore as the hyperbolic area is equal to a constant multiplied into the corresponding are of the parabola, the evaluation of the hyperbolic area depends on the properties of logarithms. It also follows, from what Fie. 9 has been established in the pre- ee ceding part of this paper, that hyperbolic areas may be multi- plied and compared according to the laws which regulate pa- rabolic ares. Let ¢ and 6 be the angles in which the normals to the cor- responding points of the para- bola and the hyperbola cut the axis, then if @ and 6 be these angles, it is easily shown, since VQ = normal at Q, that tand=sing. . . (43) This expression will enable us to express the hyperbolic area in terms of the angle which the normal to the hyperbola makes with the axis instead of the parabolic amplitude; for as the parabolic amplitude @ is related to the normal angle of the hyperbola 6 by the equation tan 6=sin ¢, 2 tan 0 Qt ay Sa ay an # sec @ err tan 20, and seco+tang= 7 sec20+tan20.. . . . . (44) Now II(m .¢)=m sec ¢ tan ¢+m log(sec d+tan @), or, substituting for the preceding values of ¢, QI (m . ¢)=m tan 20+ m log (sec 20+ tan 26); but taking the amplitude 20, II (m . 20)=m sec 20 tan 20+ m log (sec 20+ tan 20). Tesi es eo ee ee. ee ee a REECE ON THE TRIGONOMETRY OF THE PARABOLA. 95 Hence, subtracting the former from the latter, II(m . 20)—211(m . ¢)=m tan 20(sec 20—1). Accordingly, the hyperbolic area = mII(m . 20)—m? tan 20 (sec2@—1). - (45) Since 2tan 26=2tan ¢ sec ¢, we have mer Bie isc a ye og Hence the normal angles 6 and ¢ of the corresponding points of the para- bola and hyperbola are so related that 2=$-+ 4, whence we might at once have inferred the relation established in (44), namely (sec $+ tan @)*=sec 20+ tan 26. The points P and Q on the parabola and hyperbola respectively may be called conjugate points. They are always found in a line parallel to the axis. If through the points P and Q on the parabola and hyperbola we draw diameters to these curves, they will make angles with the normals to them at these points, one of which is the duplicate of the other. For these angles are 26 and ¢ respectively, but 20=9+9. XXXVI. Let P,, P,, P., P,, Py. « + Pn—1, Pn be perpendiculars let fall from the focus on the x sides of a polygon circumscribing a parabola, and making with the axis the angles 0, 0, 0+ 0, 0+6+6,0+0+6+6, . .. to n terms respectively. Let sec 0+ tan =z, sec(0+0) +tan (0+0)=w%, b sec (0-+-0+6)+tan (6+0+6)=x3 arn (7); then sec(O+6+ . . . tom terms)+tan(6+6~ to terms)=w". Hence as 2Po=m(u+u-°) 2P,=m(ul+u-!) 2P,=m(u?+u-?) ely? + (48) 2P,=m(u"-+u-"), we shall have 2.2. Py.P,=m?(u®+u-") (uu!) =m{ (unt f+ u-M+N) + (yr=1 4 u-(m—1)) |p or OPA. P,=m(Pr+it Pri) > ; but P,=m sec 8, | 96 REPORT—1856. therefore ae ee or any perpendicular multiplied by the secant of the first amplitude, is an arithmetical mean between the perpendiculars immediately preceding and following it. Thus, for example. P,=m, P,=m sec 0, P,=m sec (0+ 8), or m-+m sec(0--0) Pe ey oak . but - sec (0+6)=sec’ 6+tan’ 0; p sec6 P, = sec 0 msec 0= >. =a hence the proposition is manifest. Again, as hence 2P,.=m(u+u"), 2.2.P,) Py=m'(u' +u-+u'+u-}). 2P .=m(u+u-"), 2.2.P, P=m( +u-3 + +u-"). -. (50) 2P,=m(u?+u-*), 2.2.P, P=m7(v+u-5+u'+u-"), 2P,=m(u?+u-3), 2.2.P, Py=m"(u' +7 +e +4u-). 2P,=m(u"+u-"), 2.2. Pa—1 Pa=m7(u"—1 + w—@n—-1) 4 yt + u-!), We have, therefore, adding the preceding expressions, / : 9 PsP, PP; BR Pe Psa PeEaie: ow ols asthe (51) é m[ +P,+P,+P,+P, . ~~ + Ponit(n)P, |; ; or twice the sum of all the products of the perpendiculars taken two by two up to the nth, is equal to the sum of all the odd perpendiculars up to the (2n—1)th +n times the first perpendicular. Thus, taking the first three perpendiculars, P,=m, P,=m sec 0, P,=m sec (0+6)=m(sec’ 6+ tan 6), P,=m sec (0--0+0)=m(4 sec* 0—83 sec 8) ; then the truth of the proposition may be shown in this particular case for Q[P, Pit P, P2]=4m’ sec’ 0=m(P,+P5+2P,).. . Again, since 2Pon=m(u2" + u-2”), and 4P2=m(u"+2+u-2), we shall have OPA avr, se st ee ; Thus, for example, éwice the square of the perpendicular on the fifth side of the polygon diminished by the square of the modulus, is equal to the tenth perpendicular multiplied by the modulus. $ In the same way we may show that 4P3 —3m?P,=m?7P3n. i Let x=5 and m=1, then four times the cube of the fifth perpendicular, , diminished by three times the same perpendicular, is equal to the fifteenth per- pendicular, or to the perpendicular on the fifteenth side of the polygon. / ON THE TRIGONOMETRY OF THE PARABOLA. 97 XXXVII. Since log u=u—u-!—F(w —u-?) + 1(w— u-3) —1 (ut —u-4), &e., and as u—u—=2tan 0, w’—u-2=2 tan (0+6), u"—u-"=2 tan (0-+0+6-+ to m terms), while u=sec 0+ tan 0. We have therefore PV—PT 2 We may convert this into an expression for the are of a circle by changing + into +, tan into / —Isin, and the parabolic arc into the circular are multiplied by VW —1. Hence, since PT in the circle is equal to 0, log u= =tan 0—} tan (0--6)+4 tan (0100, &e.). (53) 3 = sin 0—}sin 20+4sin 30—+sin 46, a formula given in Lacroix, ‘Traité du Calcul Différentiel et du Calcul Intégral,’ tom. i. p. 94. XXXVIII. In the trigonometry of the circle, the sines and cosines of multiple ares may be expressed in terms of powers of the sines and cosines of the simple ares. Thus cos 20= 2cos’?0—1 >) cos 30= 4 cos? @— 3cosé cos 40= 8cos*@— 8 cos*0+1 cos 50=16 cos’ 02—20 cos? 6+ 5 cos 0 cos 60= 32 cos’ @—48 cos*@+18 cos? 0—1 | (54) sin 20=sin 0 (2 cos 8) sin 36=sin 6 (4 cos? @—1) sin 40=sin 6 (8 cos* @—4: cos 6) sin 50=sin 6 (16 cos* @—12 cos’6+1) sin 69=sin 0 (32 cos’ @—32 cos* 0+ 6 cos 6). Hence in the trigonometry of the parabola, sec (0+6)=2 sec? 0—1 sec (0+0+6)=4 sec’ @—3 sec 0 sec (0-+-0+0+6)=8 sec’ 0—8 sec’ 0+1 sec (0+0+0+6+6)=16 sec’ 6—20 sec* 0+5 sec 0 ards 32 sec’ 0—48 sec* 0+ 18 sec? @—1 ee (0-+6)= isis 6 (2 sec 6) (55) tan (06+ 6)=tan 0 (4 sec? @—1) tan (6+61.6+6)=tan 6 (8 sec? 0—4 sec 0) tan (0+0+60+6+6)=tan 6 (16 sec! @—12 sec? 0+1) tan (0+0+6+6+6+6)=tan 0 (32 sec’ 9—32 sec? +6 sec 8) : . . . ° oe: : . ° . J ce preceding formule may easily be verified. 98 REPORT—1856. If we add in the above series any two corresponding secants and tangents, the sum will be an integral power of sec 0+tan 0. Thus sec (0-0) +tan (6+ 0)=(sec 0+ tan @)’. Again, since in the circle cos 0=cos 6 7 2. cos? 0=cos 26+1 4. cos® 0=cos 30+3 cos 6 8 cos? @6=cos 46-+-4 cos 26+1 . and + (56) sin 9=sin 0 2 sin? €2=—cos 20+ 1 4. sin? 6= —sin 30+ 3 sin 0 8 sint 0=cos 40—4 cos 20+3. J Hence in parabolic trigonometry, 7 sec O=sec 6 | 2 sec? 6=sec (0+0)+1 4 sec? O=sec (0+0+0)+ sec 30 8 sect @=sec (0+ 0+0+6)+4sec(0+0)+1 (57) tan 6=tan 0 2 tan? @=sec (0+0)—1 4. tan @=tan (0+6-+ 6)—3 tan 6 | 8 tan‘ d=sec (0+0+6+0)—4 sec (0+0)+3. J XXXIX. The roots of the expression gin Ldap teas OP SO. eae (58) may be represented under the form cos A+ / —1sin A, when a is less than 1. This has long been known. It is not difficult to show that when a is greater than 1, the roots may be exhibited under the form ade Ae tae Al) sritetog gh 9a9 Bree (59) Since a is greater than 1, let a=see 0, and let 6 be diyided into x angles ¢, connected by the relation ¢ +¢ +9 +6 &=0; - 2 se es (60) and it has been shown in (6) that sec(d+o+o+¢ to np) +tan (p+oto*?# to no)=(sec p+ tan 9)”. Let sec ¢+tan ¢=w, then 2 see g=u'+u-}, and therefore 2secO=2sec (¢+9+o+to ng)=u"+u-”, Substitute this value of 2 see 6 in (58), and we shall have zm (u"4+u-")e" +1=0, (4 * 1) (21-1) =0. 3 toute Seca gm or resolving into factors, Se ee AF ON THE TRIGONOMETRY OF THE PARABOLA. 99 Now finding the roots of these binomial factors by the ordinary methods, we shall haye, since u=sec ¢+tan q, 2=(sec @+tan ¢) (multiplied successively into the » roots of unity) i (62) and (see ¢—tan ) (multiplied successively into the roots of unity). We are thus enabled to exhibit the 27 roots when a>1. Thus, let n=3, then the equation becomes 2°—2 sec0z°+1=0, and a ad al consequently the six roots are —1+ /—3 (sec @+tan (1, a) and oon » «0 (68) (sec ¢—tan (1, alive), By the same method we may exhibit the reots when a is less than 1, or a=cos 0. XL. We might pursue this subject very much further, but enough has been done to show the analogy which exists between the trigonometry of the circle and that of the parabola. As the calculus of angular magnitude has always been referred to the circle as its type, so the calculus of logarithms may in precisely the same way be referred to the parabola as its type. The cbscurities which hitherto have hung over the geometrical theory of logarithms are, it is hoped, now removed. It is possible to represent logarithms, as elliptic integrals usually have been represented, by curves de- vised to exhibit some special property only ; and accordingly such curves, while they place before us the properties they have been devised to represent, fail generally to carry us any further. The close analogies which connect the theory of logarithms with the properties of the circle will no longer appear inexplicable. To devise a curve that shall represent one condition of a theory, or one truth of many, is easy enough. Thus, if we had first obtained by pure ana- lysis all the properties of the circle without any previous conception of its form, and then proceeded to find a geometrical figure which should satisfy all the conditions developed in the theory, we might hit upon several geome- trical curves that would satisfy some of the established conditions, though not all. That all lines passing through a fixed point and terminated both ways by the curve shall be bisected in that point, would be satisfied as well by an ellipse or an hyperbola as by a circle. That all the lines passing through this point and terminated both ways by the curve shall be equal, would be satisfied as well by the cusp of a cardioide as by the centre of a circle; but no curve but the circle will fulfil all the analytical conditions of the theory of the circle. In the same way, no curve but the parabola will satisfy all the conditions of the arithmetical theory of logarithms. The equilateral hyperbola gives a false analogy and leads into error, because to base the properties of logarithms on those of the equilateral hyperbola leads to the conclusion that negative numbers have real logarithms. H2 100 REPORT—1856. Tite foregoing theory decides a controversy long ¢arried on between Leibnitz and J. Bernoulli on the subject of the logarithms of negative num- bers. Leibnitz insisted they were.imaginary, while Bernoulli argued they were real, and the same as the logarithms of equal positive numbers. Euler espoused the side of the former, while D’Alembert coincided with the views of Bernoulli. Indeed, if we derive the theory of logarithms from the pro- perties of the hyperbola (as geometers always have done), it will not be easy satisfactorily to answer the argument of Bernoulli—that as an hyperbolic area represents the logarithm of a positive number, denoted by the positive abscissa+, so a negative number, according to conventional usage, being represented by the negative abscissa—a, the corresponding hyperbolic area should denote its logarithm also. And this is the more remarkable, because by Van Huraet’s method the quadrature of the hyperbola itself depends on the rectification of the parabola, as shown in XXXV._ All this obscurity is cleared up by the theory developed in the text, which completely establishes the correctness of the views of Leibnitz and Euler. It is somewhat remarkable in the history of mathematical science, that although the arithmetical properties of logarithms have been familiarly known to every geometer since the time of Napier, their inventor, or rather dis- coverer, no mathematician has hitherto divined their true geometrical origin. And this is the more singular, because the properties of the logarithms of imaginary numbers are intimately connected with those of the circle. No satisfactory reason has been shown why this should be so. The logarithmic curve which has been devised to represent one well-known property of loga- rithms, is a transcendental curve, and has no connexion with the circle. Neither has any attempt been made to show how the Napierian base €, an abstract isolated incommensurable number, may be connected with our known geometrical knowledge. Had the circle never been made a geome- trical conception, the same obscurity might probably have hung over the signification of z, which has hitherto concealed from us the real interpreta- tion of the Napierian base e. This affords another instance, were any needed, to show how thin the veil may be which is sufficient to conceal from us the knowledge of apparently the simplest truths, the clue to whose discovery is even already in our hands. The geometrical origin of logarithms and the trigonometry of the parabola ought, in logical sequence, to have been developed by Napier, or by one of his immediate successors. They had many indications to direct them aright in their investigations. So true it is that men, in the contemplation of remote truths, often overlook those that are lying before their feet! I have shown in this memoir that the theory of logarithms is a result of the solution of the geometrical problem to find and compare the lengths of ares of a parabola, just as plane trigonometry is nothing but the development of the same problem for the circle. I have shown, too, elsewhere*, that elliptic integrals of the three orders do in all cases represent the lengths of curves which are the symmetrical intersections of the surfaces of a sphere or a paraboloid by ruled surfaces. These functions divide themselves into two distinct groups, representing spherical and paraboloidal curves, and by no rational trans- formation can we pass from the one group to the other. ‘The transition is always made by the help of imaginary transformations, as when we pass from the real logarithms of the parabola to the imaginary logarithms of the circle. When we take plane sections of those surfaces, that is to say, a circle and a * «Researches on the Geometrical Properties of Elliptic Integrals,’ Philosophical Transactions for 1852, p. 316. ON MOLLUSCA OF THE NORTH-EAST ATLANTIC, ETC. 101 parabola, the theory of elliptic integrals becomes simply common trigono- metry, or parabolic trigonometry with the theory of logarithms. These views will suggest to us the reflection, how very small is the field of that vast region, the Integral Calculus, which has hitherto been cultivated or even explored! When we find that the highest and most abstruse of known functions, not only circular functions and logarithms, but also elliptic integrals of the three orders, are exhausted, “used up,” in representing the symmetrical intersections of surfaces of the second order, who shall exhibit and tabulate the integrals of those functions which represent the unsymme- trical sections of surfaces of the second order, or generally those curves of double curvature in which surfaces of the third and higher orders intersect ? Considerations such as these but add fresh evidence to the truth, how small even in mathematics is the proportion which the known bears to the unknown! Cheltenham, August 8, 1856. — In revising this memoir for publication among the Reports of the British Association, I have supplied several numerical examples to illustrate the theory. I have added some new theorems, such as the curious properties of the polygon of x sides circumscribing the parabola, p.95; the theorem which connects the corresponding points of the parabola and the equilateral hyper- bola, p. 94; a new trigonometrical form for the roots of a cubic equation, p- 81; and the geometrical expressions for the 2n roots of a trinomial equa- tion, in the excepted case, by the help of parabolic trigonometry, p. 99. I have also made a few other additions, and several corrections.—J. B. The Vicarage, Wandsworth, Nov. 10, 1856. Report on the Marine Testaceous Mollusca of the North-east Atlantic and neighbouring Seas, and the physical conditions affecting their development. By Ropert MacAnpvrew, F.R.S. In the following Report, prepared in compliance with a wish expressed by the Committee of the Natural History Section of the British Association at the Glasgow Meeting last year, I have endeavoured to embody the results of personal research, obtained principally by means of the dredge, at various intervals during the past twelve years. The field of my labours has extended from the Canary Islands to the North Cape (about 43 degrees of latitude), and with reference to the following Tables, it should be explained that when a species is stated to extend north- wards to the latter, or southwards to the former of these limits, it is not to be inferred that it does not range further; and this it is more important to bear in mind, because alarge proportion of the Mollusca inhabiting the coasts of Finmark are known to be widely distributed in the Arctic Seas, while a con- siderable number of the Canary species extend to, and in some cases attain their maximum of development in, the tropical region. It is hardly necessary to add, that even within the district to which my observations have been confined, many species of mollusca are recorded to have been obtained which it has not been my good fortune to meet with or identify, and that of all such I have taken no note. *£epo prey Ul pozex0y -1ad puvpylog 32 $ ooay UB JO aIST yel''"** DIBA eeeeereeeeeees TVS] eeerereeess TeITOOUN|"** SOLO, GT 09 ZIP AVMION ‘arepg|***tstst*** \puory “e4.1048Ip ‘Tews yng ‘“uonbasy or0ul AvMAON Ul|"******** areA)"** pnt pus purs|qzey ¢ ‘Avg Aigueg|****'* scoyyey OG 07 Gl; yavtUUTY ‘UreIIg 07.109]eAqID)"* *** n0044 ‘RX9AUOD raaea|teettteereeeees uys| ete tteeseseeeeesseeeses|eeereeeeersoosormouqer gl auITRAgry ‘auueyg Yysumg|'''*' Aawazmg ‘suaosoqnd ‘o}eropour eerie eee ereoeree pues Wen ee ee eens puepoz “8+ SOLOU FR 0Z 01 OL steer ereres cisite's oni eons te TERI NEG senwee pbovyy ‘Q]NOSNISO]IA *SUIOT}Ry : ‘oyeropom)*"'"*""***** puRslQ, OF G 7e furezag|'**''* SMOYIL}OYR 07 ¢|“purppsoyy 09 spuvsy AreuRD srveereee soupy “euTjoaseyd “‘YanaT ‘etoviyy, ‘* HIBUIULY pue pueppaon|*****""*"*** wao7y “esouare ‘sopog ye suaumoads pexanas|****'*** axealseettsteee es pri] es settee puelprony| ttt et** SUELO ZT ‘yeus | “SmOT}RI GZ 0} WIyIWOI, WXON pur waopey 4e)"** ayexapou|*** pn pue puesio, w pue ‘urezieg|**'*** swoWpey Og 07 FlUNayUOIG YyAION 07 Vxapepy|"**""*** "waYD “voTdIAION F ‘ uopung, ‘eIsUodTT ‘oye1opoul)’** pul pur pures|**uredg 07 purpZug|"****suMOTIL, OG 0} O1|"*" PULyoZ, 0} spur|sT aren) sreseereseversom gna “esngqo siopese ‘9ye19poul|*** pnw pue purs|*** uredg Jo yyNog]"** sWONyey g 07 oAoYs|‘AezpeAquy ‘aredg 7 ad crowsrmenoes! “Ve sOVCTISOX : ‘wT ‘ex1opurg 4 “s]]OYSs peop “purlsay = “MDT ‘SLULIOJIOUND a) “quonboaj|pue dUlo,sauUT]|"Tesny10g pur uredg|'syyeI YQ 0} 1972 MO]|FO YINOG 07 spwefsy AreueD “tT ‘BUI[OIpOUt uri uapbuady euxyooxyses | “uMasny, ys “eL1008 oTUeaTOA Uf] essrceereeveeelavernmenenerms senses auttesieetsaiieiissics 07s = ceplees*+'es eH ay oz ae veecorors spurys] Axeueg set eeererereresentaseseeers alg EB ‘puepsuq jo ysvoo UT ‘e][aSvAr[g © = {Gynos 949 uo AI poureyqo AyMO oavy ff" Yeooy"""*** FMy ‘UO }S|"*puR]sug Fo YNog|"syIeF OZ 0} 10}eM MOT]? ~PULTDUG Jo YJNog]"*"*** wapunjog ‘eoovrXded By "yovaT “vopipeloud a “quonbaug|"*"""* Famy ‘ypwyo|“purlsag Jo yNog| RAO; TTQNS'pue [eI y| "8s MULE ‘opeSoy|"" urT ‘eprpuro “yuonbaay “979 yany ‘9m03S see eeewenees UICYLIG, [e109 91,qus ple [e10741] whee enone WIdy} OIC] purpsug ee one vane'” “ee SCT, ‘eyedst10 “purpyiog yo yydop ysoqywor3 ye|"** yuonba.y}"**o29 a ““purpsuy JO YNog|SMOYZBJ GT OF [e10991]|"** purpsuy Jo yyNog “eBepeyy| TT uM] “Vared “key , "SOTA UL 9Z18 aBrvy Jo|""* yuonbayy ypeyo ‘ouoys uses ++ UrEATag|[eLOITIGNs pur [exoy}y]** ~UTEGLIG 0} UBaUETTopIpoyy | UPT ‘snpAjoup “wT ‘sepoud “poow ut poqexojzad *** QYBTOPOUT| tests eeeeeweeeeresl sewers BR UIOYION| "1117777" SuMOYIET OZ 42 qsag.1OTAUAe FTPUL apAT JONI ALT reteweeeee eM QQUnT ‘si7esiop uopung, ‘edeydorky *poyyuapt you “ds ‘uosunppy ‘Opetay, “eTeydooy *SyIVULOY *Kouonbary *punory pat thee *aBUeI [LONGI A. ‘aduvi feorders0ay *soroadg a A “ 4 = 98 “ouunpypy yena-y2u0ny ayz fo vasngjoyy uo z40dagy 103 ON MOLLUSCA OF THE NORTH-EAST ATLANTIO, ETC. “UvOMBLIO,IPIT! Ul [TeUIs Ara ¢ KewMION pure puLpjez Ul ysoSae]|"** yMonbaaylsssees*-****+** puws|-**"** UTEFLIG TION] ******STOTIEJ ONT 0} G|'"PULTPION 0} UesUeIIOyIpay|****** zuvUUag ‘snpronted “T2104 G (F210) | etuulaeatala Soe 9) (37>) SOORCUECOCSCLOG uredg -3qns pue [e10341] sere OeITIG ‘uvoueLiozIpayN ste fauaynd ‘snqyeulsaeur “[eI104 “quepungelsss tts: pues| sees ureg|-aqqns pue yexo391]|"** pueTpION ‘anoueLIaIpay pssessessrceonenel agzapr ‘sista “puejaty jo *[e10941] “quanbagg|******+++++*+** pues|qgz0N pue purpjoog|-qnus pue qayem Mo]|"**""* weouerIaqrpayy ‘uregEg| ests tesa “enbITS "wT ‘TAOS “quepunge|[aaei3 pue pues| st ssepueparg} testes zoyeaA MOT] ATT TBCMOTT ‘Ure gEMg] tet ese* eT “eLeUaTe "eLIVUTUIe'T JO s}oo1uLssparpey3 Aq *SMOY JL} Q 07 pue ‘10}eM ALOT 4 ZuLsZ1p Aq poure;qo)"** yuepungel-****'+***+**** puBs|197VM AOTIR ‘TIEFLIG| SVT OOT 0} LayVMMOT]" "Tes HTVUUUTT ‘MTegIag|****** tts uaT ‘eyeouNTA “wT “eA “stun, “ureyiig ‘aredg 0 FIND oY} Ul poureyqo uauatoeds ouOlarIvI ap TBO] |"*****8"* "78s PUBS] ***"***** MLeITAODUN|""*"**sULONIVT Ge 01 OT|JO WWON ‘Weauerroqrpoyy|********* uoguNy, ‘tHMeysuIg ‘uozuny, “eueydg “mOYeW 410g ut yuenbasyz|--*+** yeaor|"** puux pue pues|**:********* ureqzaaum| "sss tssees sos STON ZRT Q|ete tte" BOUATAMIpay| tte UMOug “Basor *BunoX Te ora Loy} YSnoyy se “UBaUeIIO}Ip ‘yeus suguatoads oq} smMmoyyez OF 4e|"punqe Aaaalrr ttt eeessee pnuil-ayq 243 07 Urleyag|**'"'* stMOTyeT Og 07 9 -* TOT UOI, ‘spueys] Axeueg peqmmenesses MUD ‘snajonu ‘asambnug “eyaqiog ( *978.19poul Jan eteereeeessas pat se eeeeeesene urejza0un eoeee*StOUyey OF 0} 02 veeeeeeerasoTIQULUe FT ‘yaeuuty Pee eraser eeeeee ugnoyT ‘esaqo *Aqryeo “Ol 9u0 ul 41 poureyqo Ayuo oAUy I seeenene@ TBD OT een eererseveree pom meeteeesrses ure3za00n o*** STOIC 08 0} OF erry Terre e rer ry aus iy qoo7 seeessahipysay ‘eqeraoiqqe *SUIONILS YG 07 ‘Teoo]|"** pnw pue pues|pz ‘uvoueitoypayy|*** SULOMZET QOT OF OT/MLEyIUOIG 03 spurisy AxeueD]"**"'* sahnysag ‘eyeT[a4S00 “SUIAT] “SUOT IES OP 04 “480 Woy PNU YIM pazeoo ATjeratag}+**++-+++ grea|-*--*pues Appnulog ‘epA[Q JO Yyarq|**"“suoyZeF Og 0} ZI|-LoMUIET] 09 spuefsy AreUeD|"*******"*** 2a ‘eyeprdsno *hvay ‘elZan “yuanbayun joaer3 pue pues reer: sremrarg|*''ssuIOYzEy 0g 07 OF eet yeUUTY --ugaoT “(eyquig) TUa1Oy ‘area Araals** yaaer3 Apues|********* +s urezta0Un|***"**SCLOYIe} OF 0} OZl"**"** BALOpePY puv saptqay]’ “75a Y ashay “ByeTDUBIS f j *saquoy ‘eXkU010g "Peooy| sete pues|es* pesngIOg UL OIBAl**** «= T9YVAM MOTTVYS|"** UvaURITEgIpoyy “TeBnyzog]|********* “7uoZy ‘IpueAcIpTy d showy map pavuayy ‘exdourg *T9}@MA MOT “Aeqioy, Ut yuepunge|*********7eoo]|* yor ouoysowMy]|‘pur[suq jo yNog}syyeF OZ 04072 MO]|"** uTedy ‘seLMysy ‘UTEyIg|**s****"******* “wT “esosnr ; “SULOTIRS *S9U0}S |p] 0} F ‘puepyez ‘quonboy{pue ‘pnur ‘purs|pue seos dOTy|SILFOOTOPTOVEAMMOT!?* *eteTeeteeeeesees TeTOTIAD|"***eeeee**** emyT feoIoTe i sanaayjag ap ‘qq ‘BABOTXeg *eumordiz9.1 | REPORT—1856. 104 *SOLTBI keg 89 UH pers AIOA ‘xeqTBAQTD UT adIVBT|"** gtronborz}errreeeeereeres pues|srerereerrrreee UTedg|sqIeyZT OF [CAOFIT[Gus|uesiprey 0} spuvpsy Areueg|******* *wayD ‘eurysodsoa : ‘un ‘eIqoumes gq ‘ural squonbory]sttetteeees pues|eeeesessseeres ured] tess raqeM MOTTeYS|-oypoyE ‘UIedg Jo YONI ret ysaq ‘eTTIOVUOp "Ysa ‘eUsaposayy *ga[Iv0s “erlap 0} JIM WOIZ AMOTOD UL sSaLwAl*s* quonbarjlsserressee ees pues} ses BITOpRA|'SMLOYZeT OZ OF STC «‘Solxeueg $= ‘avqpeaqrg| tg *puozy ‘suaqtU ‘OZIS [[VUIS JO ynq ‘sa10zy “so10zy pur ‘uvoued199 pue ‘enopey ‘soueueg ut qguonbarz}esssss**peoorf tsetse t* pues|***'*]eBnq10g ‘oreg|r**'** SUIOY}LT OS 0} Zl-Ipoy ‘SoLtvuLD 0} [[emuUAOD|"*********** “gUOTT ‘vaue4Svd - "UOJANT, “OUT “uvaURAIAMpayy 04 rompal ttt eetteesees pues| settee uTeqza0UN|***** SsTLONILT ZI 03 g|pUefary pur purlsuy jo yMog! e+ og ‘sngod *¢ saleury ‘roped “quepunge!’***t****tes** pues|***s**meaTeIIaIIpayy| ss eres eIOAgTT “OP ‘TeBSnj10g ‘ueaueTIeyIpayy |" YO ‘snysnudA ‘quepunge)*****tttess*** pues teteeeseeeneen pSpre Ty “++ ULOYIJ T 04 aIOYS| st UROURLIOyIpay pt eT ‘snjnound} “ULET MOAT *quepurge|* ts tsttestts pures|seeseeeeeeeees trrpatag | eesssstt esses" TeIOATOF (0814) uredg Jo YON} “en ‘snuyeue "UurT ‘xeuog TOIDAT Tes tee eeeeseeleewseceas ¢ Ieqpeaqry nosassetesenkenees OTUs srrsecereeeroeeesupOUB IIOP st eeeneaeee hog ‘1p1e}400, “quepunq’ eeecseneenecsee pnut eoccescccnen ¢ urIeyUag eevee secseescsones ai10ys eee ULIUIIOPPITy 04 uleqig eecccccecece au) ‘eyerodid ; ' *LIYIDUUNYIY ‘BIIL[NITGOING G (710) | a 0 | Oe éuredg JO UMON| ts aroys|"* stung, 07 puepsuq Jo Mog} esr rseee yuOnT ‘smud} ‘suonbeaj}*** pnur pue purs|***+*uvouesozrpoyy|***'** SuOUyey OF 07 git’ JOpeSoyy ‘uvouvssoytpayy| 8 Uuoug “Tet “quonba.y|*** pnt pue pues|*ssssss++ LeMION|'** STIONIL QOT 02 ET| TT UTeFLIG 07 yIeUIUT|*** wosdwmoyy ‘elpomiiezut “quanbary|*essstessees* putes sss tests eee ees aIepIg|******stmoyIe] OOT 0} El UvaUeaIoyIpayy 07 YwUTUT| s+ UOT ‘roeustad “‘quepunge ee eeenee pnu CSCTOOOS COUT nay hy teeeee SULOU}eT OF 0} ¢ weeeee Iopesoyy 04 yavmury set eeeteteeesee pooy ‘eqye ‘enjoaay “eAuasopudg ‘quanbaggy}*se't*'s*+**++* pues|***satdeny ‘avgperqry|**sMoyyey OT 0} eL0Ys|"UvoURLtepIpayy Pur [eBnyIog]|* rr “UT ‘SNyCTLSLys “Aeg Ayueg ut amu ‘sap “VU OJ PoSporp PULS UT SUTAT] PUNOJ++**++*** Qrealreessseee estes? pUBS]eretes sees UTeATIONN ***-STOUIL OS 0} OLTIMqez 09 spuvysy Areueg}ess***** 2carwagy ‘snprpuvo *“sopLiqayy 94} 04 *OYVAPOU] "teehee PHT seereeeeereeees UTedg]**t*** sMONTe GZ 07 s|Spuris] BAlopesy pue AveuRO} +" “7a ‘sngejo1B00 squinyg ‘Siy.1Nd9T0g *[BOOT| "ttt e eres eees PUUS|srrrrtesseeeees Sore AA tee’ SUIOYIVF 9 0} a1OYS seerereee TIBI OF IOprsoyy seceeeneseessenenerr UOUINSOT *SaQ4oyy ‘U2TOSIIVLID *(panuyjuos) Vey adaoy ——_ *SxIVUIOY *Aouonbary *punor idee ah gral *aBued [O10 A ‘abura peorydessoox ‘sotosdg pn 105 ON MOLLUSCA OF THE NORTH-EAST ATLANTIC, ETC. a a a gen a | Ep Te *summOy yey quanbaary|"trr' 8 8** pues|OE OF Og ‘UTeILIg|"***** SuOyIeF OG 0} f)"" t+ IVULUTT 0} UlEsIg) "8 UMOnT ‘eoudrya “quonbary eoeeasesersseee pues “suyey c ye ‘a1eyIIg eeeeee SmOT} UF cE 0} ¢ ee eeesenerrseoe OSTA. 02 ule}Ig a) ‘eplpos eee pues saeceesercovess é OIC] COUBOSOOSE FOC £0) 8 (5 sre eesoneseees* TODBSONN 0} OSIA seeeeseesres $a ‘esoSni “180 -eIIOIpPI{ Ul oreI ‘uvaUeTIo} IPI pue zIpeg 4e [[eus ‘OSTA 4e ysadreq}"******** TeOOT|****** "UIT “8108 TN *purpsuq *19BU0I48 speooy| sss reeree*** pues|[esnzsog pue uredg)********* tage MoTTeYS|FO YINOg OF ueouRLopayy| 8888" “may ‘eduo[go pue aaMomen Avg Atjueg uUtory *puryjoog quanbaag|***s*t+ss+e*"** pues teeeeeeseoeoons TTBATEG|*eeeee*"* JOIBM MOTTBYS|JO YON 0} UvoueroyIpoy seeeeeencoee SUNT ‘ronda “UT “eLrerynT seater ennnscttteeseceseases ag sarjatiea $Aemourojg ye adie, AroA)*** *passordui0o ‘pazersys eee quonbay seer eseeeerene pues seereeoeeres BITODEIAL +++" SULOU IEF GE 03 OT se eenwoeeaee eILOpryy, “Iopesojy "4809 L jo WIJ E}i al seeeeoee*TBDOT sasheasasTaeenniryy seeceeeoecsones BARTERIA wasnGnisepaseae ss SSOTOTIR on eer rceccesccesessccccsasess[sessocsceagessssssseseseee® ‘ds *[@00] see ** pues seoree *-e8ureyyl see STOYyRT 9 04 a10ys teeeeecooecorsssseTpOUVIIIMpI IN Foesecsennes rT a) vaorund *Teooyy"""""""* ** pues|"***" UvaUuPLIOpIpaT| Peep “(suey C1) aLOYs| UvsuvIIE}IpsT, pue yesnyi0g|""* sees SUNT ‘eqeuryd. ‘ayeropoul peeeeeesevetens puts “es TeIUBILOUPITA ar0ys see eeeeeeens Jopesow eSnq10g PONCREE a ORO 77% ‘24809 “suonbay teeeeeeesseoees NTRS! eT trees eS RTE TAL . “+ 910ys seteeeesreeseeres -UBQURLIONPO| TS MDT ‘erjaypornd *a1e1|"** pnw pue puvs|"** ¢ Spuv[sy Areuen|"*****SuLoyyey OF 0F OZ} SPULTST Ayeweg 0} OSTA, ** 2ya00Lg “CYCLES *Spue[sy 0} + uLeeULLLOIPET seeeeeeseooeeneng Ty “24.104SIp she we meer eneeeseee *quanbaaz| ttt ssett*** pues|"*" WeaMeLIezIpoyAl|******SULOTILZ OG OF OT Azeuey *“SUOT IEF quonba.y|"** pnd pue pues|0T 0} F ‘sBas oto1y\"*"""* SMLOYILS OP 0} fF)" ssseseyreuaUTy ‘UreqIg| "77" UMoceT ‘eumrxoid “yuonborg|s st tssttseee pues|"** a TBIUBLIONPITNY Ba seosisnne ORI ‘eueljouea eee eee ee eeeres UurT ‘QuoTyo ‘wnT “ea1ayyhg *passard | -u100 ox0ut ‘AjoLIvA UvoMeIIE3IpayA|"** quanbaay| street pues] steerer uTegTIg|* SMO FEF OY 0} BOYS)” ULIUBATO} pI OF PUL|PION ieOOF } Io} apy Mo, ye dn Snp ost, ye} yuepunqelsssssss***""** pues reseeeeneeeewnenOBtal* SULOTIET (1% 0} BOYS!" ULUBLIAITpay 0} PUe[PION eee eeseceene fauaqng ‘eq0uT] pewesionasinnes 0% Hem ‘eya]Oxe “og ‘stuia3ry seesseees gupuuad “eyepun *saguog ‘sisdoulon'y sees fing “TyUEpneg see eeteneeee “UDT ‘epliog. seeres ery eoryde1s003 oo smOT}ey 01 nse ensewen ens one TBQUB IIOP IAL we eeeeesrene qyaanag ‘suoqIu *WRITBIII} “qeoo]|-** pnur pue purs|"* reyperqry ‘OFT, |rer0y}TTqus pue [e10;}T] -Ipoyy 0} PUe[JOIS JO MOG" you ‘earne “UBVIULITIU PIN -yuepunge|"** pum pue purs|****** O84 “puepaz|:**** sMOTIRJ OF OF Pipue TeyTCAqL OF PUC[PION] "°°" °*"* "72MD ‘eounsITA -quepunge|: joavsd pur pues: ot, ‘Keg Arqueg|* suroqyey QT 0} et0Ys|spurisy Lopesopy OF PUCTPLON| "°° **** "POM ‘eryseyjnd *quaTnose “uvou ue se yySnos pue ‘pomesysa yony|"** JuRpuNge| jorvzs pue puesyesnytog pue mredg|rexoy [Gus pue ye1043}1]|-eatoytpayy 07 Avg uvdypregl se “wT “eyessnoep mprefiunn ‘sete, nee eeseererreeseee "WT ‘sndL "mT ‘stdnI9Ue A -gyerapoun|-"* prot pue pues| srs uTeqIG|"***** STOTT OS 07 E|"*” aROURIIAIpoyy 0} UreITIG “quatibauy|ss*sesseeeeeseeseees Reds a debe «are < sees naedlinan “quepunge|**s puna pue pues) sree aeyTeIqTg| testes TRLOggTTqns|*** UeaUBLIE;Ipay PUe ZIPP) “juanbaay eeeeecccccereee sweet |ceneeecastesecessssrnseslencesesesemermtons cree eaeis lens “91vI saison seme smOyyey 08 0} Q\UeauLITOYpAy 07 puepi0N Net eneeeeeeeene ‘UvT ‘snoponw | | “Un, ERO “yuanbaayl |eseeseee puts ouy * STOLSTV. ‘WeqyyRaqry “"***"SuIOUyeS OF 03 CE perseeeeeeoressee TEBOTBLIOUPINW paiceabsir Sasi 4 seg) ‘2qe1148 } ‘ueauRlaypey || ‘oyeropounjsssss ss seeee+* priuy|'**** UvauBLIoyIpay|""******SULOIVJ B 0} F/pUL TeBng10g JO ysva-yINOg Beeeeeees erp “BYUISIVULd ‘akyg Jo punog ayy ) ‘yaeur |, Ur quonbaxy (¢ [Issoy) suaumtaads: peap|'': yuonboay|--* puoi pue pues|-urg pue purypron|’** sMoMgey NOT OF GE} edeQ YIAON OF LATOYyMOAGT]************ MENT ‘eynured) ‘yuonboay|-** pau pure purs|Aeaton Spurpjoog|’** suoyyeJ OOT-0F OL] VCMT 09 UEyTIg)******""* waaouog “eyepned 1 H | | | re) | | “dayonunyay ‘epaT 19 gre AIDA sieeeseeeeeeeee paps] ssreeeerees UMOUMUM] et" SULOUIUE QZ) ees eee? PURTPION steerreesesene Aine “EINgBUNT] & “juonbauy “** puuL pue pues tecvoneesoees HIBULULT fee SMO} OPT OF OF oe adeg YON, 09 rehetens pececeeecsosecsppanier ‘eprony { i | *ARMION |, i) ‘{eOO]|*** put pue puvs|***+*"**z seas ONT] SMLONIRT OZ 0} OZ|‘AIIQ IyoLy 0} saplaqey]***"***** vagsunyy “eamsAd ra } | | “Wang “eMpjOX co) ‘ayexapoul|** put puL pues|"**** UeaURATaIpay|"* SWLOUYL ZT 0} GLOYS|"**saqTeUeD oF ULIUBLIOZIpopy|"***** “wT ‘eouRtIoypoyy — | & | wnt, “ekuatog e “yuonboay|*** pnw pue pues}'*********** uTeZZIOUN]}* SMIOYZJ YZ 0} VLOYS|**“SoleUR) 07 UvoU.LIOpIpIT] °° MPT ‘seproydArs rs ie 8) roaer Aras seeeteeeess* paesieeesstes tes Uregzaounssssee es SOMMER QE ttt PURIST aoraSeyy 3 "ds ‘aqRlapoul)*** pnul puke puus|s****'**'* UreZTaouN|********* ss SLOTS OS|" ““qsoplemuEyy)*"*"* “aor ‘un;nyURSey9 “9101 Araalts+ss+++9*+9** pags “* GMOuyUN * sul0yyey Oglhrressreteee sc eeeeeeee* TeqTeTQrD|P seeeeeees ony SOUL ‘aana|*** pnurpue puus|*****"*+* maMouyun}s**smOyIeF Og 0} OZ/RIIOpePL ‘SaLIEMND ‘ARgYVAqLD|"**"** 2y~o00ug ‘uNgeyound “juonba.y “phon pue pues) eg aegqeaqro}: “++ -SULOYILT OG OF OT satVURD 07 OSI, peesereeseecgog ‘mnsoyided "purjery pus: | 1 i : ‘quonbedy|*** pnur pue pues\pueysugq jo ynog} suoypeZ og 07 a1oys|-* spurisy SxeuLD 03 upeyug|'** “apbuady ‘wmoiFaA1t0N *URIUVIIOPIpPIy Ul Tjeus “quonbay|"** pur pue pues|**'''** ULayguOrq)|’** SWOYIL COT OF Ogi tt" WLVUAUTY, OF UTEIAG)'***""""" aaaagy “UANOLOaNg ‘ost, qe suoumtoadsysaSvy ‘somengsa ‘o3t, | ! *Sa.l0ZV JO punorS Apoom UL UOULUIOD ysoul|*ss******[eoOT| "ts" +*8+* pna|‘pue[suq Jo YyNOg]’**** SMOYILT OT 0} Z/pUL UREULLIOMpPay] OF ULEzLTg|*********** "WOT ‘unemsid | ‘uvT ‘unTpAed : *(panuyuoa) Bpey dey S *SyIVUIIY pene | *punory | eg git | tasuer [Roya ‘aSuvr peorydess004 *sotoadg 1 111 ON MOLLUSCA OF THE NORTH-EAST ATLANTIC, ETC. “Stas TLIO “"DINuaUl DIpLOspy JO oUeM UL pappaquit Ayjeraues|"** quonbey|jaxv13 pue pnw|**puepyoog Jo3s9\\ “pneu "quonbasypue ‘poo ‘yoo esses YLVCMUTY| SULIT QO] 0} O10Ys|"***++++"+*+--reUTUTT UIE {Ig ‘a10d “yuanba.y, “TT[ON PUG SOTIO4S|******etrs Areued) ***SULOY}e} YG 0} V10YS|pue ‘sored ‘avauRAlayIpay, ay *soroads oyu Blre* aqerlapoul peo sessacemeceeanaTT soorsvcceese wMouyun Fee aeartteee SWIOYIy: eg Tenneees seasons censeea sor TOULUB ET UIC} Ul 91e.1)*** quonboay COCRURECCUR CED i ihasi lec at Ts “quonbely siege een eeeee erTTU -TMON pue fearon “STON ey OSI 04 G fe reccene “o7g ‘ZIpeg|"***** smOTIS OF 0} F|-Ipayy 07 purlsug Jo yyNog YTVULULY OF PULPODG| 888" Ay “errr "SHLONILF OOT 0} a10Ys|"*spuvysy AreULD oF YreUMUTA|***"****soguog “eIEIOMAICUR eee eesescccases UnT ‘S1OOSIP ‘umoung “eTfeUIIQ “* qyaonag ‘eudeyag ethest sti stosneasge oma ‘ds “elope ‘lopedoyy, pue weawer1a4 Pac eereesseeses ‘UT “eyeqreq “quanbeaj}"** pnu pue pues|sqyey eg ‘pue[pzoN|'** sMONARE OCT 07 OS" ULUZLIGY OF YAVUMUTA|******s*+ “zeyeT “euTToaseyd ‘soleuey pue ‘uearer, *O1@1 psavescasse a ™ “erlap ; ef Eas ‘ A "DTG Tesrsssesseccescsscces eee eeeneeee urez1900n possesses dpsnevEteaelssey | ' ued ) A POR 77, pv! Pe > TAT 89.4 tssa w=) -F REPORT—1856. 116 I aes ¥ - — a... htt ee ene de | 54 Tipe Sips = ETS x a be i A el et Se ee Ss saa i a i : eer es re a Z RS O79 ‘n0qod azts ut AzorIVA e913 ' ‘sorozy pue wropeyy | f *"umoug ‘suedarostp 0} yoalqns ‘1opeSoy 38 ezts ysodrey\*** quonbaay|s]poys pus syooa)**es****** UIVAIaOUN|** *sULOTIe} QF 0} aL0Ys|‘spue[sy AreueD 0} UleflIg) |**''* ‘we7 ‘strepnorosey “ur “LOYD 8 cepaut ds | ‘uosunpp ‘sodipag squonbaggy| sts syaoaesreess gsattemeg| sttestttttttes azoys| eters spuRlsy Areueg| ttt hog ‘utr, *aply out &q poztsodap SeSye Japun}:s**** 13210) | aa LUC Suspssanensel mre TnUgh newest acs aeernn"s SLGUN es ce ceserc ss gene ene MET BALLET | ees Seem eL Ta) ‘eqv[nolyuep *guanbaay see eeeareres syoo1 seeeeettteee UICPAIOUN| "ete eessteeeeeee a10Ys seereeeerees So10Z¥ ‘soLreueg see eeveetee "001 O SQOIAGID UL pUe sou0js JapuN|**> quanbaay|yoor pues souojs|*** tress UTEyAGg| st tstsseeees oOYS]"** quo] ‘uLqg ‘sarozy|************ shasfar ‘eqre “UvaMeII9} ‘mnT ‘epnoLNy “Ipaq Ur Inojoo deap pur {[eais Q10YS OY} UO vasa[SUY 4ev oZIs aBxe]|"** quanbaay|'’’ pnw pue purs|**(vaso[Suy) ureyaig|"**SMON Ly QF OF VIOYS|"***** TOpeDoy 0} PULTPAON]| sets euDT ‘eyerosey *suoumtoads "UT ‘RT[aVUIOT, uayorq 10 ‘Bunod A19A yytan your ATWO}*** ayerapouufs*eseeeete+* puBs| este +t UTEIIaUN|“*SULOYIL YG OF BLOYS| Te eeteeeseerseeeeees soTECURD] TTT ge -uNT ‘edweE “quonba.y *** puul pue pues te eewereteeeees éZIpeg PEED TOR COC IFO) a) 0) f3] OIE AOL ZIpeg (esnji10g tee eeeeee asarnhintgy “ey2L4s *supphy 7 ueq} popuedxo d10Ul|*** quanbaay . see puts +. sorivueg|"* seeseereres OTOUS|" oe teeeeee spurys] Areurg sone secececcee “pout ‘ds ‘oy ayeVdo TIA papueq oztqas|:** guanbay|" ss pups| st sormvuRg|''*SULOYYLT 09 0} OT] *RATopey, pue satreuUg]|ss*ess esse sees “pau “ds ‘aBvay ATOUATYXA]"*+++*++*pRoOT| eeeeteeees PuBs| eset eee sete etete|sseaeeeeesetneeee QrOgp etree teeeteererseeess TOQsIp| eet tt teeeeersses pout ds faded] ore tee tee puRs|"*** UBIUVIIOJIPIT | "“"***SMLOYYLY OP OF OG] *''079 ‘sIOIS[Y ‘Ruasvggawg| esses" YZ “eyepNAO *‘MOQSI'T 42 9218 UI ‘oI0I|"** Puu pue purs|**** * uleyag}*** swoyjzey OOT 0} OT] ''** SatreweD 03 Sopriqey]"* “yavaT ‘uoURIO dJEIPIUAIAAUT ‘UvaULALOJIPI I UI [[eUMs|** yuonbay|"** put pue pues} OBTAI * sMOyIeE F ‘aTOYs|"***** UBaURLIOIpoy ‘UTEPLIG] eres cw2T ‘syepAY “Sup “wT ‘eyag -a001d jo Ayortea oynutur v ATqtssod):** yuonbaagl ss tsseessspues|s punog Vyeg| terse ts STIONYR GQ] sereseestrteseteerres puRtag| tt pe py ‘ThopuRPy *[Boo]|*** pru pue pues} ss FORTAI SMLOTIRT P COLOYS| ese *** MOQSITT 09 ULeAIg} NY ‘BIRTTNG “oN “AO ROY ‘yuonbayy|***pnur pue pues|{eMIoN UIIYON|"** SWOTILJ OOT OF OZ’ YAUMUTT ‘wMaqyUOIg|*"******""***-UZaoT ‘eqye ‘spurysy Arvued 0} ‘oaea|teerrete tt pues} ttt sse* Ureqtooun|"*****SMLOUIL] OF 0} OE|(euaseyzIeg) uUvaueraypayy| **** shoufar ‘sipseay *suoyyey Og ‘Up AerMy| 8s oer *pues|**** ** ureylaoun|*****SULOTyeT OE 0} OZ)" WRsURLIa}IpPIyy 0} PULTPION|******"** “pUOTY ‘ezvorquin *quonbaaz|"***ttseees*** pues|***** UvaUeIIAzIpaT |" "SONICS OF OF OE|"** Spuejsy AreueD OF MIVyIg| “Zev “eALTLeUE *punog eqeg ‘foodtaarq|[eoo,“punqe|**ss****sss***pues| tresses UVTI |"TeLOJITTGNS PUL GLOYS]sersreessssteeeess essere sete) ees" guar “esn4qo “juonbaaj|*** pnw puv pues|'s+ uvouerddaztpay|"*****SMOy LS 09 0F OL|***spueysy Areuey ‘3 pue[psON|’ “-guopy ‘eyeouNAy ‘ayerapour|s ttt see puws|ssserees sees UTeTLIG|"*SULOYIEF YG 0} aLOYs|""******ayLIOUT, 0} PULTPION] °°" Wag ‘gaovrpultso “(ute *ugaoT “vuyousg comedy teeeeeseee** puesikeIIN]Y) —«ULePLAG|"suLOMIeI 09 03 a10Ysjexopey ‘Satteueg ‘yreUUTg|******** wozuy “eUTeAY ‘uaaoT ‘erdydsiqdury ‘(panuzzu09) BPOdO1d4SBx) ———— ‘yuamdopaaop yedio -utid jo Aq1yR00'T [UE Una ID ISSIR *syIVULOyy] -Aouonbarg *puno1y *aSURI [RI4IOA. ‘aBuet [eo1yders00yH ‘soloadg 117 ON MOLLUSCA OF THE NORTH-EAST ATLANTIC, ETC. a a RR A A DO A AA NE LSE ET PL FO, A I CRIS SE I ETE EE | ‘uvaULLIO}IpI| Ut preaqsea orex AIOA ynq ‘reqTeIqEy ye\"** yuonbaaz|***"* *o2p ‘sT[aYS “yuonbarj|sou0js pues SyaoI|"*****'** Seas DOIW|"*“suLOTZeJ QT 0} a10Ys|"*"odey YIAON 07 UePY Jo oIST|"* seereneee ¢ DUBTIOZ]"*‘SUIOTIET gc 01 o10Ns sere8e+* TODeSONN 0} pueppiony ss waynpy ‘eourSr1A * vay ‘siyeurpn4ysey *zqjoyasyasy ‘exwoy *9red|"** pul pue pues| sss UTeZTaOUM] 8 STOVE ZT/* spuepsy Aremeg}ss ss" gs Anup Sraze torpa|serseressee*** pues|sset **a1ejza0un -(peap) *sqIeI OL 04 gi" ‘ow ‘sialsty ‘sojden|** ++ uling “youreg *Apwg ‘erarpes “‘mueaueLIO}Ip ¢eSeE “OJ 9} Ul preAysva osuer yOu saop|*** yUoNbady|ersssss**** « Syoo-ey PU TeypeAqUg| tt tte TOYS] ees Topesoyy ‘eseypepy| ss Aone ‘ensosye ‘aummg ‘“eweuoydig ‘pronqjad ‘qyoours ‘sz0ys|***""**** axea}*** pau pue pues|*s""7* vas oOTY|"** stONyey 00s 02 OB! TT! AVAION WoqyION| tte te ets spaurds “sapuays Aran} ***** — [eoofeset teeerreeee pum settee g OSTA su TIEE OS 09 02 HOSIA | rtrtsetttteeseseeee nou ds “sIUN, 32 1apusys “eITOPLIN atom ‘aztyA yueredsueay Ayories|'** quonbezg|"** pnut pue pues|'****‘uvouedeyipayy|***smoyZeI YZ 0} 9T0YS|pue ‘sormeuey ‘uvoURIIoyIpayy|"***"**** ~“dsaq” ‘suaosaqna *SUOYY2I OG ul uomMtOeds [ ATUO poureyqo o1aym ‘sarteueg Url orer A19A\*** quepunqe|’** pnt pue pues|[esnjz10g pue uredg|''**' smote Og 0} ZlemapLyY PUL SoTTeULDO} ODIAI *****eete*** *ueT ‘steyUap ‘ayerpouieyur Sureq AeA eeatotte ‘ “ION WoIy suatatoads a4} ‘sotoads quepunge|**: pnut pue pues|{jesnj10qpue uredg}****suoyyey OZ 0} g\""''*"** AOpesoy, 07 yremury ee ree OE rant aMes JO SaMaIIeA 9q 0} 9AQTIAq J iy at *SoTIBUeA ur orel ‘mo][oo ureato}"** ywepunge|***sss-*"-*- syooa| ttt" Topesoyy| a1Oys|*********** soTIVURD ‘1opeSoy| et pout ‘ds *odedss""* sT[9qs|"° “*" UMOUZUN)***SULOUIeF OGL 0} OOL|*** # AP MION U19T410 Ny} * veesee SUNS! ‘snjooATe ‘afddit 2q} Jo yorar UI}TM *QIBA| teeeteeses syoor eeereceesece ule}190un raw ielptaulebaielsivieisiacale! ar10ys seasencie Varn ebememnee OMT TOUOl ‘Yq49T 8999 ‘sisualreues qnq 3.101 eas ayy asoqe eye i quonbay teseseceees* SHOOI “*"" TRAUB LIOPOTAI tteteveseresereecs QTOUS|'** UBIUBIIOIpay Pur BITVIN eee Yd ‘TOg *quonbady elev eed acs ORREOEDL 2 “UeOUBIIOVIpPaTy| estes" OLOYS!*** UvIUBLIOpIpaT pue Zipep|* fpuy ‘snqnoig *[B00]|"Som0}S pue SyOOI sereeeese G TVY[RIQUy|°** SUUOT}EF 8 07 a104s teeeeeee pra Sey leg Ie} CIQU iether sd hog ‘TOSSIYT sTeooyfersstttettt sya} et UIeATIOUM| eteeeeseessess eee QTOYS| estes SeLINgS YW ‘asnoerthg tesewers sees 77107; ‘snuvyoleg “quepunqe "*S91104S pue pues ceerevye rer P ORG ***SmOyyey ZL 0} a10Ys eee e ee eeeesscccree uogsly ‘OBI, seaeeeenee oo pooy ‘sna[ny *pueysy Thy ‘aatjadg yoo ‘ueqg aeau aFre]}:** quonba.y|**-*-*+**** samogs|*******" "7" ¢ AVATON|** ‘STORE QT 0} AL0YS|"""**"* PUeyOOY 07 YreUIUTY\****** “GUT “O ‘sneToMIeUt “ULIUeLIO} IPI ‘ayeIopOUl|syTays pue souoys|****** 8°" UTeWTIG|***"** SULONye, OF 0} Fipue ALyTeAqIg 0} YrenUTy sereeseseees IUDUUaT ‘STAT *[e00]|"** ‘029 ‘arodty[nN *SOpLIqay{|"**"** SULOYZ] OF 0} gi*** WIet}WOAG YON 0} ODTA}********* “Mog ‘snqelpeouRD “KOM “quonbagy}syays pue sauoys|-AON pUe puRpez|"'*+* smOyqEy OZ OF P| | HaAVUIUTY 07 OBTAI*"-""** *2uayD “snTTase ‘ayeqapoul|"****""*"*"* sauoys weccccececes KeMI0N “9+ SUIOMIET OZ 0} Fl etree YVUUIy 04 puep00g SEE LEIS SINT 777 ‘snqie *Iopesoyy pue ‘quanbarg| s**t" gauogs| steers sees nregtag | tereseeeeeesees QaOUs uredg JO WON 07 pue[pIoN treettesececeernurr ‘sn gdguld ‘QU0Z ULLIEULMe] ; : r | *auenbaay sveneseccece som038 ‘£@MION xR puepyez “+ SuTOT yey 0z 03 a104s uIe}yig seeseroocesnns i "STTIOUS NUP SATOIS!PIARTINARIG WaTOATIs** oma UIMATICT L222? * Lnife nn REPORT—1856. 118 "IoT[eus ae suatatosds u1IqNOS *‘snonj per @ uodn ‘adeg YHION *BULMOT *syIBUIO “++ gaeropoul|***trsttt't* asoy} ‘Surat, suauitoads Aueur youl""’ jo 4sva pourejyqo suauitoads 4sad.e]|-- -[OJ jo Aqorrea poyunys @ Ayquqoad tereeeees Qapalt s]jays PUB pUBS|'*********** UTeZTa0UN|"** *ouanbany ron —_ > as -_ Die eit Roe rors ow *Te00}|" pues pue sTeus -=°o- UGS TOIIONPSTA *****STLOUI UT 0S 0} ce seseeseeeseneeeeeetrPOTBLIOIIPITN ssteeeeseonnnyouyy ‘gn 02 td *spurys] ‘ajeriapoul|s|[ays. pue souoys|*** ¢ UoUeAIayIpayA|*'**** suIOYIe; QZ 0} g\divULDQ pu UvaUeAIOIIpITV raaeay tees sguogs| "setts ouAT YOO)" sMOqIes OF 07 O[|uteyjuorq oy Avg uoAreuIeD|***'***** *[ROOT|S[[aYS PUL souogs|************ ULeZIGOUNI"'**** SMOTIL; YZ 0} 9] OSTA puL pur[suq Jo yng seeeeeeeees mason fquamog *f ‘esset1o tee ea fg ‘vasor ‘eyeSu0ja *‘quonbaay|stjays pus sauoys}"***** **UIEFITG |'SULOYZLT QOL 0} ax0ys|" spurysy AveueD 0} pue[psoN]** “Mog ‘eyeynoryex *spurysy ‘uvT ens Uy ‘quepunge|"s 7" spjaqs| ‘o* aredg}: suroygey QT 09 oroys|Areuey 0} UoAtET. prog) ‘wy ‘stsuautg “mnt “eeerydkjed “gaeayce syjoys} tn 8** UreZta0un]" . SMO} OF 03 OI" “sees esemeemrpgeredtaqtpa \, eee maps ceisn ose Ua ‘esoqqus tweens teneweneee ‘aqetopoull*'**'"""*** Sypats}*** ¢ UBIUe.LLAyIpayy a10ys|" sprays|"** (qynog) urequg|"* ‘yuanbey|""*"** ereureey|AeMION pure WIezLIg|’ SWLOTIL} ZT 0} a10ys|"**** IOpeBo~ 07 adeg YAION ‘dap ‘saa1spy ‘euadeyqaeg|***** "wun 7 ‘stutojimsun. "unT “ejnpideaig * SmONIey YS 0} G]|' ULoUeIIaIIpo|, 0} PUL[PION] wey ‘voleSunzy “wmnT ‘sisdoo[tg tretreeeeees ure “epronqiad “woe “eyejoundoisit “quanba.y Steere eens $00 ***1BOUBIIAIIPI IA] Tene eee wesw eens ar0ys cof sinapverneessisrs oo ‘S1OLS,V *(ayj01 quoube.y}*** poem] -20uey) sateueg|'"****smOUgRy Oz 03 ZT |Se10zy pur ‘enapepy ‘sommeueg|"*********** Bzs09 “UOSsNYy *qguanbegg| tt" SOOT)*2-"2°2080"* BILOpeyy OOP tee e tt ta neeee STOUE i esescet ty seers Ae RALopeyy] seer reeee uuhognqg ‘smuoy “quaubaxy trereeeeeees guoalellopRyAl ap SaLIwURO| aroys|""**'BAlapeyY pue saireug| 8 “QOL ‘apurg “yuonba.y seteeseesees syggal'***UBaUeIIOppoT| °°" OLOYR "45° "Eeuereseeesatecn Tagrmrcnni"**"*" seine ‘sLieyjaqnas *quanbaay}"** “* SyoOd/ellape yy 2p Solreueg|"** “'eilapeyyy pue satreueg|* "940 . ‘WOMO'T “guanbayy ttteeeseeres gwogal*****UBIUeLIaTIpay|"** aaoys|"**-* PARE s SrTaSNs EIN) ‘eypequy . OTT 1 ‘e19dse quonbay} tt syoorettepe yy 2 satteurg]****** aroys|"*"*"* BaAlopeyy puw sateueg} QUO. “eyey4ns aOYs| 'Spurysy Bilapeyy pure Areurg aaoys}""'"'* (02M ZaRqBAquy ‘ureytag|**** aLOYs *guanbaay ees ceveeecee ‘guepunqe)* os “guepunqe|" terse Syoou/ealopey 2 salreueg|"** syooa) ttt" Treyta0uN|*** syooa|'****" uvaueLiogipayy| titties ¢ lopesopy ‘se10zy a1OYs|‘URIURLIA}Ipayy 0} pur[TpPsoN|”” ‘quepungel tts syaoaf tees guregg] ssesttttettseees quanbaag|"*****"***** samtoys|* AVMION UIAYIAI0N|*** *guepunqe|* pn pue souoys| AeMION UTOYZION|*** SMLOTIEZ 06 07 OF sreeenesseee sag (f ‘eyeuedDd * uvag ‘vorelyye a Sines 029 ‘S101L8[V fIq[BAGLD, setae eenee "UT ‘ea[nIxd tenner seneeee WT “eye3[nA ‘wT ‘Byard STLOYIL] OY 0} OZ] euLury ‘puepery Jo yynog| "wayyy StaMATNZ ‘saquog ScaNIpttd suLOYyey Qf 07 gfe AVMION wraTION| ts wayyy Seow eeccccresnee puryoos JO 4SOA\\ weeeessessaQdOy ‘sopro;éoue ‘eqyadarT seeeee eee Ava *(panunzuea) mpodorayseey *punoiy *yuatadoyaaap jedto -utid jo Aqtyeo0'T sasued [CONIA ‘aSuer peormdersoay | ——_. —-—. ‘soroadg o> a. 119 ON MOLLUSCA OF THE NORTH-EAST ATLANTIC, ETO. *eIOpeyT ‘spuersy Areues ut ered AroAl*** yuonbaay}‘* pnor pue pues|"** ¢ weaueTIoyIpayy|****** SULOTZeJ OZ 09 F[pur ‘sorreueD ‘UeoUBIIONpoy| "888" “wT ‘snfnTOD “qeqiqety 0} Surpioo0e ‘ainydqnos pue znoy{ *sa10ZV ‘ealopeyy ‘soreaeg 00 ‘m10J ut AjoLIeA 4913 03 yoalqns|"** yuanbaasy] +02 ‘jaavrd ‘pues|*s* 8's UIeILIG|" SMIOTZeF QQ 0} B10Ys|‘ueoUeLIaIIpayy ‘seas YsIg|****t*****ue7 ‘snurydAziz *SULOTILY 0 “sumo, ‘WIT ‘snqoory, MOI, poo pot uo yuonboay ysoul|"** yuonba.y|***poom put pues|-ey OZ Je yeuIUTy|"** SULOYZeT OST 0} OL)’ YAVUIUTY ‘Spue[proN|*****"*** Anoyznog ‘eareut0 "pjod aI popueq ‘SUOyjey OF 0} OF UrIsOMION *99e1 ‘sulomjey OG sym smd yYstyt1g|-apour ‘fedo]|" sou0js pue pues] *********** YavUMUTA|*** SUOYILT ONT 0} Gol yaemMUT 09 AouyIO}*'""** yoo SuNnYseqele *jaaeis *yuanbaay pue ‘pues ‘poom|"** sees Aemi0N “**eSTOTIT QOL 09 Fy HAVUUUT 07 URGg]****"""""* “Mog ‘eyenpun ‘quonbaaz|**"** eLreppoureg| et" KUMION| SFZET QZ 0} 199VM MO]|YIVVIUTY 0} puL[suy Jo YONI “guz ‘EO ‘eUTOTTEY “STMOTIES OT YNowj1eq ‘yaoaT “eqtaesie yl ‘SUOYIET F OSTA ‘SULOY}EJ ¢ IOpeBOy}****"**** oneal" puur pave puvs|s''s***"*** areyta0uN|**"*"* stAONyeT Q9 0} ¢} 1opeSoyy ‘puejsugq Jo yyNog!""**""-s***"** snyeutTeoqns “poo sajrvay ‘siqioopy oq eee quonbe.y eS aeecesescsoes yoor elapeyy pure Areues ec cecesrereerecess ar0ys|" spurysy Balope pue Areurd TerTTPT eT Te i! é ‘ds *Sutpaooid jo Ayourea 2 ATqtssod|-- * quonbaay vecvesssvecaves yoor hss EURO PIPO TN sae eeeeeeseeeenses ar0ys pees sceuscee sade yy ‘req[eiqry) seeeseeecees UT “esol [aUey *PIVMYINOS oY} 07 ULYY Spur] EspurjsyAreueg pur so1ozy “SJ jauueqy ut ozIs JaBIey SUTvq}e| °*- quanbaay “tteseeveseeens WOOT er" TIBTTOOUN SEOGSOSS SOCOM ET Taha ‘uegURATOTLpoT 04 Aosuzany panties. saan “eyepnozeqny "wT ‘siyore yy *soroads Jeqy0 ueyy TOSIe] yonul}:** g7e1 Aaaal: steeeeereeseoe DUTBS a vaccccssoer ure3190un teereseerees STOTIRT (if 0 os ena siewees Hee **h 86" *-UBTPION eacccases *UaaoT “eyemnsue i saued|ssersseeeeeee pues} seers ure|TooUN| * (peap) SULOYIRT QE) tt “spueys] Areued “gO HOpyIag *RTACU tomer ttre tees pues] eres UIRZIODUN| SHON IVI QOL 0} BOYs|-Ipuedg WoyWoN ‘Kouyio} ss * Auewapg ‘eyedst10 *JeT[eus qonu "q40 . ‘etjaansstag 4nq *s2unuLuoa ‘T jo “IVA @ Ajqissod sth eeeeerrBgg] tnd bie daWe of ONita breeree El coins Keostg jo keg Niois.0'e 9 easier eore Houle ode tiewebwelle oe Kine ncngs chewet ena els seLInysy oe ccccvecseaversce ¢‘paur “ds SOXUTP reese sereenenssessy eo 5 ULB Un "= any “"|sal0zy pue ‘ellopeyy ‘sotreue) eae "UDT “engrxa “OTJUeTZV JO 9SOy} UeY} AOTTeUSs 1 yonur + susmioeds uvoueioyrpoyy “+ quepungel st teteeteseeeete|eeseereereee BT IgOUT] te ttteetter seers -BTIODBT UBIUBIIAIPIPY| te? “aUoDpT ‘eyeSuojord “quepunqe set eeeeeereresreeeens *- ureyeoun|** - sa10Zy pur ‘ellopeyy ‘Soleueg FIRE IERET 774 ‘stunumu0d “MDT “euiyyuey ‘ayeIopOuN|"***** SaUOySpULS]"**** UBSULLTO Pap] * SOTA (9 0} aTOYs|"~spuLysy Areued 03 seutysyf peyg “eqqra “1opesoyy “yuonboag|"'"*8''**"** samogs|****“URaWeLTAZIpayA|"** SHIOYIeT F 0} JIOYS| pur ‘Aeqperquy‘UedUBLIONpayy]’ “MMT “BOSOX *e11ap *yuanboay souoys pue s[ays}'"* g UBaUeIIOyIPOy|* SMLOYIZT YG OF D10YS|-ePY pus SoTIvUeD 07 UIeRIIG)|"***** ** -wog “eyenotyor "UuY'T ‘B{[IINSSTy ate wah pue som04s ee ees SuULOU4ey 001 a 06 rail 0} apaig Jo WM Neapiarpemmia ret '7/ STLUPEON Harri? NNN NP sarorgi**sereseeeees Marra TAT is STM nmmy 1856. REPORT 120 _— . i g *** auonbedj|souoys pue yoo)" WeaUeLIoypoyy [pue seLInjsy JO 4svod 94} WIOIF snypory, Jo setoads yeroaos “g’N | {°° atonba.y|-**-o2 ‘pnu ‘pues|"** ¢ UeauertozTpayy seer rpooy|seeeeetteetees* pupal ss? ureqdooun TeeeeeeeeTegop|ererereeeess syood]***** URIURLIOIIPITN Lr" guepunq *MOjOO pue IzIs ut AJoIIeA Yonui|*** yuepuNnqe phut}reyeiqiy pue o1vy syooa|"**** uRaTeLIO}Ipa\, sete enee tees squanbaug}etsstt* syooar| sts sttss urezza0un syuepunge| sss syooaf ttt see ureqrooun ‘S1aIS[Y 3 8399148 9} UL ppos|*** yuepunqe|"* syoor]*****URaURIIOIIpaT, *a}e.19poui)** meres nu) *****"UBIUB LIF PI Ty *quepUNqe| poo PUL TAARIS|*****"UBdUeLIO}IpI *purps SyOOI-U7] JO 4S9A\-YNOS ‘UROUBIAOJIPO IU} 19} YOU saop}*** yuepunqe *PAVAATTJNOS OF SANOT -00 Jadaap ‘purpsuq ut azis ysoSze]|"** yuepuNqe|* pour pur joAvad|errs* ses" UIeT9OTN *URIUBIII}IPI [AL “Baso[o dy} UL punoy you ‘sotoads U1OysoM U/*r* JUepUNGe) sees syDOT-UY ‘aeyy JO 9S] “uiedg Jo 4svoo YI0u "VIIvU “AU M oy} uo Apre~noryzed ‘soyorea Auvw|*** JUepuNge|-twey pus pUrLs|-ION puB UrepIg "OM ‘ “vLIeurMey Uo yuanbay ysoul|"** yUBpuNgeE|*o29 oaeI3 ‘pues|-lON pure purypyo7z, ‘suanba.y\"** pnua pue purs)***** uvaue.t1ezIpay\ quanbay} ttt purs|-"* aiedg jo yI0N “eye ‘suMoyy ‘quonboay|*** pnt pue pues|* purpyoog jo iso é puvpaiy pus “pn pur puvsipurysug jo qnog SMLOTIIVE P OF a1oys ‘uveuRitey “* pnul puev purs|-Ipayy pur avqputqry -?} OF fstuny, Jo Fnyg ‘suoyyey Gg { reqeaqhy ‘suIOYyey GT Ul SutAT]|"** oyeA19pou “yuepunqe “OLIOUd J, ‘raqyvm doap ulo.y AyaLIVA THJYNVaq UI *** oyv1opout seecsenecenevoe NITBG|s#+¢°*e+"+e" TTBITOOUN *quouldoyaaap jedio -urad Jo Ayeoory —$ SS | *SyICUOY, -ouonbarg *puno.y a sreeseseseereres QTOUS|UBINLIOJIPIT PU IVITVIGID|***********ULT ‘sNyVoLTeATp “ULIULIID} "+ smouqey ¢ ‘aLoys}-Ipoyy pue [esnz10g JO yynog)" * ‘mnT ‘snyepnoyan “8 STOUILE ZT OP Ql ett ATLOIS pus eye] + uhvg “mortssur tteesererees OTOUS| MROURLIOPPIP PUL IEITVAQU| ADE TYAOTTTOTA, *So0ZV seer" smMONI] ZT 0} F/pue ULIURIIONPIT 0} O83, se eeeeeeeees hog qasne'y rrteeereerereeeeee QIOUS/ULIUBMOTIPIT PUL IeIBIQqUg| tt Avg ‘paeyony aaoys|tttetteteee* ayosgouRTy]* a Key ‘hones aroys}**Spurjsy asvareg pur Aavurg|" “say ‘sn.1odaput oor Trey aaoys}"*****SaTeurg ‘uvouetioytpayy|"*"*""" *wuyT ‘saploreseay seeeeesSTTOU TET 8 04 9 seceeevceresovers UBIULIIONPI IN eer eertnee Wd) ‘wnjnuey “uveueiIayip “-stmmoyqey Z faloys|-ayY pue yesngtog jo yyNog|***** é1opesoyy ‘uredg + gx0ysljo WAON ‘purlsugq Jo ynog|"*******'yzs09 vq ‘snyvauly ‘spur[sy vilap ‘StL EZ 0} 107VA MOT]-RT pue Areurg 07 purpag| rt wT ‘snSvat ‘lopesoyy ‘uoqsiy ‘uredg ttreereereeeeerees OTOYSIIO ON ‘UIE, JO 4SAA\ stress esseonorr ‘snqeotTiquin "yy ‘snyepnorpeura * sWOY VJ YZ 07 atoys} "OFLA 09 adeg YON] ts “wT ‘sNTeTETIIO “+99 suIOmIS OR 01 Z ceeeveene o8t,, 0} adeg YON] sss guony ‘snprainy * SUIOYIL} OZ 0} OLOYS|VALOpL] 2 Salavury o1 zIpyy yy q ‘snyepnusso “spuRlsy vilopeyy pur se suOYIRT OG 07 F]AvurD 07 puejsug jo YING SWULOT}LJ NOT 0} GC’ Pur[PAON 07 WeoUe.LIEzIpay\)" te fauaying ‘sunStxa iY _ ‘snurrSoy[t0L tree Anon ‘m3vquoyy i ULIUBALOJIPIT 0} WiVzLIG *salOzy pue ‘erapry ‘soueuey ‘purl -o1] pue pursugq jo wnog *SpURIST VALOpLI “res suLOmyey OG 0} c/pue Areuvy 0} uL]Yy Jo as] “= smONIeT 09 09 * SuULOT3?} GT 04 ax0ys sereeoeeeseeren equey ‘SnqUlUys sererees susogy ‘snyunuesd ‘wT, ‘snyoory, ‘(panurzu0o) SPOCOLS4SBA} ——————— *QBUBT [LOI A ‘aSurr yeorydersoay ‘satoadg EAST ATLANTIC, ETC. ORTH ON MOLLUSCA OF THE N cee | ee — ae — lnnire Srmanetmamanmr arn ITOTT ‘quanbaag|""**"" 874 *pues|puepsagq Jo yynog|:"* (peap) STUONIVT QE rete! ATG] eee guonr “emyound *[e00] seteee tresses seeeeeeeeses Ure TOQOTIN *(peap) “SURE OG 04 0g seeteeeerrerane Aqwos ‘soplaqayy weecaessenseeee Yd ‘eydjnos *SoI0ZV qUOTW JO snaszypupwa ‘ay goul""* yWepuNge|********"*"""" pues|-** EUBIUeTIOWIpoy|"*"***'"** (peep) otoys|pue ‘ueouerteitpoyy ‘zipeo| s****'** “yeyg ‘eyeTNUeIs *sol0zy pue ‘oSr, ‘puelery pur urezIIg Jo *ayeOpOU|**"******e"""* PUBS} *"*****OTeITQOUN|****** SULOTZET YG 0} QjISAM PUR YINOG ¢uIEYyZUOIG|Aazunzy .Y saquog ‘snyyeTeo “puryery jo *ayedapourl********"""* — pnta|-*****ss* audg Yoo |"** suoyzes OST 03 OG|yINog pue puepoog Jo ysaqy|"**'**''* saquog ‘epoorsskqe *[B0O]}"** phot pue pues|***********" aeyToOUN)"****“SMLOYZLF YE 0} GT|"SaTBAA PUL PUL[IOIG Jo ysosAl "8s Aaqunzy ‘tMVOg “Ssa10zy pue “erlopey, “quanbagg|‘stsrteeeesssss pues} setters ured ““SULOYILJ QE 0} 9LOYs|‘soLteuey 07 pue[Sug Jo yNog|**** +8" yoo “eyeNUATO "oaea| teetteseese* pues|sseeeeee UreTTaOUN “+9 *STOT Tey OL OL Og sepraqory ‘purye7, seereeses SaUO TT ‘eorpueyyez, *IOPesOTA, ‘suepunqe|"** pid pue pues|*** zipeg pue osta|""**** smoysey F ‘or0ys|‘UeoUrIIOIIpoy pue o8TA|-* raat pues| eset UTeqtaaUN]***** suAONIRE / ‘axoys|*zipeg pue pue[Sugq Jo ymog|"*"** ““ pnoyouy ‘e240ey] “quopy ‘epnyeL4tys "Mad “COSSTY] “yuanboay|"**[oaers pu pnt *******+++** ¢ LeMTON|"****sTUOTILT QF 01 GT|"" Be): (0), IOC ee rameal***terreeeess pues| se teees ss TMOMAUN] ttt STIOTIET OG spas subnet» Seboren sre MO BAT ION(}| 2°" >" *- «ds “‘quepunge seeeeenccees POOMI soe ens SOpLqoy] state sett eeerene 910s SOOO AeMI0N areyIg seeeee ‘QD °O ‘stqroueld “burma ‘eauayg speooy| tsetse s|t*ssuvaueIIayIpayy| tresses agoysl tt satteueg pure eSeieyn seesseeee soucy “eynyeounay *eILOPBIN ‘amoT ‘eyjayeounty, "Ve SE[R TN qeou 2194807, uol'** quepunqe este ae anv OER, treeeeeeeess Trea IQOUN weeeee SULOTYIT 0g 03 F pue ‘sormeueg, TeaUBIIOFIPITN gc wes Cees ee egy “STpTITA “UDT ‘CUIZIIA NT “pessarduu0o ‘ysiTyeus|**° QYLAOPOUT| “sree t* SNOT eeeeeeeee UMOTUM| tt teeeeeettees QrOTg| ert teste eeeeeeees ropesojjy sectereeeeeeeeeees DOTT ‘ds oe *So10ZY *SoLIVeD UT [[eUS ‘seLIngsy UT areI}"** gUBpUNge|'***ss88*8*** pul’ 'sqyeT 8 ‘reqeaqiy 8" STTONyey 09 0} S[pue sorreueg 07! selMgsyl tt wT ‘snsoSni “ueauel : ‘uT ‘oquny, “yuenbazy nevarrssren Uniag -IOPIpITl W1OISeT|"* SULOTIET ZT 0} Gi Apog pue vqpeyyy hog TXNOTA "DUdd “uvoueiioy ‘[eOO]|-vu wLagsoz UOj\"*’ UvouBdayIpayy|****** SMLOYIeJ G pur F|-Ipayy pue jesnz10g Jo yyNog|"*""*" 2yaIvaG “erpouITEqUt *Sol0ZV pue ‘ertapey, ‘topezoyy 04 ‘gunpunqeys**s**srr* paaaayeees se" serINgsy|"******SULOTIVI G 07 E|‘uIeWIIG Jo ysaq, puB |MOG| Ts rWT ‘sntd “UnT ‘eljauriseyg *so10ZV "00. "s+ guanbaugysstrrss""* soot} spueysy Areueg/sss***sssesee-"+*+ gaoys|pue ‘spurysy ertopeyy ‘AreueD|‘(eyuopouopy) Ty0jayyJog ss sessesapapoisetetees “puws}"*'eetessss meg zaaun| "tse" SUOmIET QT teen eee eee Aparg | tresses “gq ‘SNOTTTTA “pues! { UIURLIaypayy “G]"*****SMOYIWS GT OF BI|" *eeuarT ‘snaUINSUeS eeeeernemalses sam “peguuoptr REPORT—1856. 122 *[200] ‘III *quonba.y ‘OSTA 42 UsWIIOEds peop o[Zuls vl... quonboay “uMayUOI, 4B emer ATOA)-++ guanbaay (|--+ quonbaag seseeeeee gagy “* quonbaay “* quonbay seeceaes igmea “* guonbaay *paqtiosapun ‘ernepey, mou ¢ ‘satvurg WOIy 9g 10 G ‘UBIURLIOIIPIT WoIy sotoads ¢ 10 Z *** anepunqe ABRBOGOE |: “** quepunqe ‘adel ‘nojdmeyynog 4e zis oB.e] Jo "S001 JO S9OTAOIO UT AJOTIVADITYA 9U}]--- guepunqe “BUIAT, 41 WIT Jour you aavy J]-+ oyvrapour [R00] "2193807 uo uonbedj!--- yuepunqe *[800])° *[B00] “quepunqe * o1B1)* eLreurme'y|"* ** KUMION|*"** suIOYZT 9 07 aI0YS sees BIIBULUeT|** * KBMION|*** suLOYyZRI g 0} ats *B.19}S07 pue CIIvUINe'T “pues “pnt Reieasens “pues Hreeteneeeee pias Hees eopuus Haeeeeeeees sopra "* B194S07 SEIT ICRC 9344215 peusenseeeesees DUT "pul pue pues}: “* pau pue pues tee §9m048 Japun “"peam puv pues ““poaM pue pues sysntaenes sie. sep AK pao weet ee eeenee “yuepunqe “somoys pue pues poaas| sreeereeeeseerumpatag] eet sereee es TOVM AMO] “rteeeeesens SOTIBURD|"****'SUOTIL] OG 07 OZ sereeeerseee EMOUDpUN| se" gELONTET OS UBIURILOPIPOT ISP|" “* -TIBOUBIIOPIPITA| STUOTILT ('P OF O.LOYS “+e *UBaURIIAIIPI Al] ** SULOTIVI Qf 0} 2L0YS “""TIRIUBLIONpOl|'** SUIOTILI QP pur OT “UROUBLIOUI pay SULOIU, F “es UBIURLIOU PIT] ""SMOYILF ZT 0} 910YS seers MOTNUN] Te" SUIOTIET 07 ureg| sttettetettee ees pecsenhs# SSR TUanecrertt "8" SULOTIEZ OF OF F ser eeeeeeeeseeeiipgrtg| tenets teteeteaeees Heseeeseeeneg oun] ¢ purpsugq jo yNog|"syyeE ZT ‘197wMA MO] suredg ‘prop “suey 09 ‘coydmeqynog|*st4ejJ QT 09 1a9VM. MOT “*“puepjoog Jo 48a q\}"** *SUIONART ¢ 04 F a.r0ys ““SULONILS OG 0} ZT “= aredg Jo yyIoN|"***** suO|IRY ¢ 07 7 ‘rreeeeeeeeour@atg|*-SULOUIR] OZ OF OA0Ys teeeeserseeees sTTBATIG | “SU}LF OG 0} 10}VA MO] “sorreued “SULOUIRS OF OF OF) ar0ys}" seerereneeeson DUBS: eeereeeeeeo BITE |****** SUIOUIET QP O7 PF) ureqg tet tssess guoye ‘IOISSeIO “adeg YON 0} WatoyyUOI(]]* wee eeteee adeg Yt0N ‘uleyIg te teeeee * ugaoT ‘esorqryt “QUO pT ‘eOUIA VIUCULMe] pasesinecsssis.s © STR ET Riaer SULOUIE} F 0} axoys pmERRES e's eye Sorte OSI, ‘Trey tae eeeeee UOpLNT, ‘snjooynd “orp “onlay Wor pue ‘puepez ‘easajsuy|'**-"""** y7so9 ‘einpryed “uopun 7, “BUNnde'T Fee “+ gilopey pure } | oonieiene teed 331 aye 04 sreadde pue ‘seq 04 parle *** oqvlapoul *aye1opoul *quonbo.y sored *aUIeU STqY J9pun soroeds auo uey} stow A,qeqord|"** yuenba.y "eSb[eI JO 4svo UaULLIOIIPIy{ It} UI panos youl’** yuonbaay ‘mNASNy, YSIPLIG ulj****'** aavI “quonboa.y “quonbaay NS *aI@d e) a) | *yuonba.y ES ; ‘ayvIepour ° a *quonboaay oo *quonboaay *quonbaay ‘LOPS 9V o.nea\"** yuonbaay ‘oyG.10pom “qguonbaay “quanbaay “quonba.y *AyROOT puodas & UT 4L peurez;qo you aavy [ ‘zis aBaey yol****** oreI ee ed *syIeUlay *Aoquonbaty 128 seneeerresseosenntrys]** "+ IVOURIIOPPIT\ | SULOUILT Op 0} OL0YS|pus ‘sormeury ‘UeouLIte}I pa ‘1opedoy pur ‘eilep “TOARIZ puB puRs| srs CS UTRPTIG|"** SULOTILJ g OF DIOYS|-VIY ‘AeITVIQIy 0} PUB[JODG|™***********"pUOHT ‘eamdind Woseseeseeesens BILODRIA, PUL +++ pnur pur pues} uredg ‘ureytig|"**''* stomiey Og 07 g|spuefsy AreueD 0} puR[pION} "ss puop ‘stLeaUTT Ses Bag eb Sriet> DUTGS ttresersrees TEM OUUN “8+ SuLOyyey 0¢ 04 02 te tewereeees AemIon UIOYIION SEER ELS 71007 10 ‘sipeprarerdd “Bdlope IN ‘PITT “BIoUBIZO “pues pue somojs| ssttttttsssess Ted g]***syyL g 07 1O}VM AMOT|PUB IOpeBopy 0} TTEMUTOD] sree" “pwoyy “BCATULUT “IeyBIqry pur “spueys] sossiy ‘Stsoyoe'y “+ pnur pue pueseSny10g jo YMog]"*suMOYyZJ G{ 03 a10Ys ATUL 0} WOGSIT JO Yooyf ss UT ‘eT[o “pou, “eqimikc (peop) a10ys POR meee tee eeneraeaeenaeee Oley eee wew ewe t seen eaereseeaeee ‘ds ssseeeeepTrOpB PY PUB SOMIBUBD| str ttreeettereeeee* “pat ‘ds *sol0zy pue ‘spurysy seater ensaeareseee ax0ys eIapey ‘Kreueg 0} IOpesojy seerereeeers "940, BULIqoZ seeeee pnoyouy ‘70071 “see pmes| reese see UMOUyUN} st tts Soeeepues|ersstteees* gareueg|** ts stOyyey QZ 01 ZT seernteeee Veteeeeseres gygogltiretse? gormeueg “uRau sHreseseeeseeeenaes|-prraypayy Wdayseg| tte SuLOmES Qi ttt korg Jo ysvoo ysum] settee uD T ‘su90saqny *spue|s] salozy pUe ‘etlopryy ‘AreuBD}******""**** Wosuamang ‘eosny eet en eneeee ween eee eeeeneeeee syooa|*s**s* so29 ‘satmemed “ual srreeeoeesssees NBS/-BIIOpIpay, Ulojseq|"* a10ys sooo eee BABA ‘stun, ‘saa18[V se eeeereeeee hog T1Usaeg *LOPCSOT, 0} UvoteIeyIpayy pure zipeg| ‘wT ‘snauega *spurjsy Areued 0} URIURLIAJIPI PUL TeypRAqny|"** 2zyaovoy ‘eLIET[aquINTOD "UDT ‘VIL, tieeeteseeseseesereseees JODUBOT | teeter" paul “ds * spurts] Axreurg ‘1opesoyy te Saensoerssoacvegar ‘eleqeis *spurysy SUOUyeT OF OF ZT[AreuRD ‘eyeyY ‘SLUM, Jo FUH |e" eV “VUrTwoas “* STOUT 09 0} G[|"spuR[s] Bllopeyy pue AreueD|]" “qo ‘eyouend “+++ *STIOYIET 09 0} G[|"spsy Areueg 07 WeoURTIOypay|"***** 2aI04Vg “VULYSapULTO +++ SULONILF B 0} 2LOYS|""*** spuLysy AreULD 04 zIpEg| rr wuNT “VaoeTLUL UT ‘VTOULIICTY spurysy Areurg ase gaiie@sscioeessgg7ry: ‘eprint sury “eeardkcg, (panurzuoa) @POdO1A4SVy) “**-SUlOyyey Gh 0} BT ***syoOI PUL PURS|***"* "YLaUBLIO}IPI TL *UeOURII9} seseseeeeseeeee puesleipapy pure aeqperqty ***SULOtyLy QT 0} a10ys sre" SULOTIRY 09 0} 8 seeeeesseessens NTRS “souoys pue pues seweeneee ¢ lopesoy treeeeseeees TTBLTQOUN s*8e***"STOUIRT G OF & ““-SuLOYyRy ZI 0} 10ys sreeeeeeesesoee mapa] reetrersersees CIVURS, seeeesssorerees nirygl: * ureqte0un ***pues pu syooa}er**ereree"* ¢ zpeD sete eteeteee w1e}.190 un. wee eeeeee (peap) a1oys eerste teneees mi in i ‘yuautdopaaop Tedro *saroads -utid jo Aqtyeo0'T *punoiy *oSUBI [COI}.1O A *aBuvI Teorydersoay 129 ON MOLLUSCA OF THE NORTH-EAST ATLANTIC, ETC. rk cen (ct **sarer Rreteiev ees STOR ee eeseees mrez.1a0un se eeeeeerees SmLOyyey ce Cee eeseeetsteesess stun, jo yy . UT ‘stp. | see eemen rey OS E9425 . “UBIURIIOIPIT see SUIOTICF OF pue ce saree weeenaees Stun, ‘124 e.1Q1D) . sresseees (098009 *eyedsno “UBIUR.LIO}IPITY IY} Ul pue ‘erlep oveees pnw ss Urey.1200n wh SULOYIVS OT 07 Qe sofdeny ‘1eqeaquy Z weeeeesses*2yaavIg ‘eueu “tI “Teq[Baiqry 4e pegiuept 40u | Tr teseegTpy|teeseessseeeres pues . sees sa).9) ‘sorden eee SuIOTy ey 0¢ 04 OL ‘ON ‘AptoIg ‘sorde Nn . oo YT “esomsn1 IO Mow Bipasuey, jo satoads ye10A0g iz OIR1 steteaesseeee== HiTRg eeotrcces urej}a0un oonevess SUIOTLILF (31) PREG R GO SOUC CS QDS RIP IN : eeseccccoes Ud ‘eueiS 9yeIOpoud)*********"***** URS URAUBATOTpaP seq)" SULOYIVZ Gf OF Ql tr****** BALpepY “ow “eapePY| rs YET “euTTeOas “RAI3 “*"**"T1BQUBIIA}IpPITAl|’ SUIOTILS CZ 0} a10Ys|-eypy ‘solzeueD abner srresseees fing “mulpnbne A sroreeeeeees TeqTBIGEH|"*"*** SULOUILE CZ OF Q\**spuvjsy AreueD 04 svlInysy|"**********2yaovay ‘sueBaTa “SMOUILS F ‘aqeiepoul|*** put pue purs|oj zg ae “"*** SUlOyyey BT 0} Zi"** URoUeAIOJIpayY 0} UTezIg|: “(e724 -01R09) “IVA T9012] puepyoog Jo yyNos pue ‘purpsuq jo YJIOU ‘TVA IaTTeUIS ‘yeony ‘quonbaay/*ss++s*+++"** puvs|o8tA pus [[eMm109|"***** smMoyyeF Q9 09 Gl-1og pue o8t, 07 puepoog|**'*** gumuuag ‘eye4s00 “ETOP srevtesseseees ‘SpURTSy Bap ‘aqe1opoOul)*** phi puv pues|pue UUeLIoypoyy|****** SULOYILS 09 0} gl-eyy pue Arwueg oy purlsug|'****** syoovog “eye[oITyS *SULOY}LT *ayetopoumy"*****""* pues aUylng “UvaURtTayIpayy|*** SMLOY WF OQ 07 OT|***** TOpeBopy 07 purpog|-""** -zygq “emoyskyoerq ‘ayeJopoull*** pnut pur pues "079 “UBepeyy| sess *suOyIeZ g 0} F|"** TOpeSoyy ‘uvouemtopipayy| ey “eyeStacy ‘quanba.g|"** pnut pue pues|******uvoueioyipayy|" swoYyIey GZ 0} ax0ys|"** spurs] AreUeD 07 UTEP! "tt" "++ guopy “eynqau 9ye.l9poul]*** pnul pue pues “RITOpCIA, Ul FT UIT JOIUT 4OU PIP: gye19powm)*** pnut pue pues ss UOT ‘eyenus}ye “sod A) 0) ‘oPeIapOUl|*** pur pu PURS|-BN PUB ALIeIqUD|"***** swOTZeF OF 0} gl-e pue ayroUay 07 apA[Q| ss * “guopy ‘stows "(Avg ‘uvoURIIOIIpay pue ‘eitep *o1B1|"TOARIS PUL PURS|YOIMIIG) uUlezIIg rama) eres erseeeeee pues|seeeeree ee areqTg.uN ‘a10dT][NN *£EANION ‘quanbaay|\pue ‘pada ‘puesijo syseoo w1oy310N, “OSTA "OUR A| terete reer ONT ‘puesug jo yynog “yeu ‘quanbaay|"** pnut pue puvs|-Uly pue pue[proN|**-suroyyry ZT 0} o0Ys| eet ++ YTeCTUTT 09 UrIEILIG saseeeseeresesessesonorT ‘emMI "3.181 SO ORO Sf )> on s** reqzaoun|* SWOT] YG 02 01 . YI UU, pue pue[pioy . docs es sitet scerniOe ‘easor *** SUIOIILS OOT 0} GT|-RINl ‘Solteuey 0} unlequorg|*****'****'"** saguog ‘sox04 “**(Sutaq]) suLOyyes OF sree LomIO 0} sBos ONOLW| ts waQOT ‘eueu; saeeee SULOYIRT ys 0} g seetetees yaeurury ‘mreyy W0Ig se eeeseee Manon “TTOG] OFF é “SO10ZW yovaT “erpadueyy *** SULOTALE G 0} OLOYS|/pue ULoUeAAOIIPayY 07 ULePAIG|**'*** -zuoyy ‘stIepNSuezdes “MO JO YJALY pur 4svoo ysvq oy ‘oyeINpOU!*TaAvAs pue pULs|***********3 YIeUTUTA|****"SUIONZLJ YG 02 OT * yeMUTy pue pueppzoyy|* ugaoTy ‘epnaytut uo yuanbayy ysour suamioads ysryitg|*** guanbaag|-s+*ss++s+*** puws|s*eesss* | Lemon “++ SuIO YES QOT 0} Fl7*"*7*" Svas oyOLY 0} ULepIG|* uopiny, “CURA, *guanbazy|"** ** pues|smuoTyey QT ‘ABMIONT|*****“STUONILE QOT 03 FI'"****""* seas DOLY OF UTezLIg]|"***********“2U0; 011 Ae ee eis Sadie 2 | eee HAT ** NN NY nxvl ++ + ** errr *smouyer ne ‘puer - EE En ae an eR ER UE EDEL ES © ESCO TEE > squepunge|*ssereeeeeesee prmmfereeeeseseeemeyzooun] "+++ smOyEg 09 0% F|-29 “ueauEsIONpOyY 0} OBLAls* 9 : “ysog eonsury | “SULATT POUTL}GO OU]"** QpVAQPOUT| "s**t tte reeerewees|eeeeereeeeeoTTBATQOUM]***eet*teeerseee QTOTS *(aq40100URry) spurysy Areueg 4949 9999 ff SOPlOFIOATA *ULOUeIIOPIpI|Y UL a1VA ATOA évuep | “spuRls] Salozy pur ‘sysvoo onULyyy oy} UO WotMUIOD|"** yuonboagz}**'* SHyOOI-ePY PUL SaLTBURO} ss seers" OTOYS|Patapeyy ‘Areney oF sBLIMASY|*est*** “wT “eMLOIseUTCAT “quepunge|pniu2y pues‘syool|*"**** a10Ys ‘uTepIIg|* SMOTALF OT OF 2L0YS|"*"**'*** OSTA 07 adeg BIONI cueT ‘snqdey “BurAT] *TeSnjA0g ‘wmnT ‘ending "aavl ‘seLMysy ‘uolty ye BULAT] str * OMB} rts puRs| ste UTeZTaDUN|sSMLONIRT g ‘prop o10ys|pue uredg Jo saxoys OyURpW| tT" “uN “MoINes’ “eITapey *quonbaag)* "8 pues] URIUBALERIPI||’ SMOTYR] OT 0} Ot0Ys|pue ‘saLeURD ‘uvauRTIOyIpay] tt UBT “esooTUS ‘UDT ‘SISSCD ‘Teooy} ste pues|* ss uRaUBLTayIpoy| eset seMOgRT ghteeteeeteteeteeets seers grep wey “exoydouroa “uvouet ‘sotieu "UDT “BIIBPISSBO “JOPIT UO}SOA\ OY} UL puNog youl********* [eoo]|"** put pue puUs|*s**ss"*UTeZLaOUN|"** sSULOyIL} OP 0} ZI|-eO PUB WeoULILoyMpayy ysUG| TT UT ‘vayes : “mpT ‘wunipod a *QUBI|Mreetererseneaeesersldecseereneccessennerssanlawersverroossconsa. GIO Bluwrettenseveaseaseesscenene REUTOZNT ee eeeseereeaseanesees OTT ‘ds oe ‘oaea|""* Phu pue pues uMOUyUN|** suOyIwE Fz 09 BIl""* see BIApRy| eee paur ds on ‘qava|*** pnt pue pues|**'"**s-uMouun|** smLomgep PZ OF QI| TT BMTepRpY| tess pawn ds i *quonboay pieeses akon ce aera monmes cones TBATIOHN seen ee eeteee sSuOy yey ;_ |i SOO LERCL SoLreneg opesoyy Penns sce ee Cerra C ‘idtuoporgy 2 “yuonbaay "SOU0}S PUL Syoor ts UIBALOOMIM| "sss seeeeee* QLOYS|* SpURIST BALOpLP pure Areurg pbrvsise arcs stderr: BLIeIGIo ro) ‘Spurys] BMlapeyy Ay *R194807 UO JUepUNGe|--* yuepunge|** pnw pue pues] **'****o2 “VBeleT|" SOT, QZ 0} BIOYS|puL AreuLD 04 URBURATAyNpayy|******"*** 2yaavag ‘TOULUL a “uRIUBIIEIpP ‘sorjoties AUvU)*** yyvrIopout|*** pO pue pUes|-oP PUR IeIPwAqny|""**** sULOYQe OT OF Els -OpeBoy 07 UvoUVALagIpayY| ett UN] ‘eqdutOs ‘SPIS] 10Zy pur ‘vilapey “yuepunge| tt syooa| tts uULeyTeouN]"*"*** Honeteetseee) OO ‘Kivueg ednq10g jo qnog OC Lee 177 ‘eorqysnd ' “uDT ‘eljaqunjog ‘aava|""* pul pue purs|'*'******UTeZIOUN!""* sMOyyey OZ OF SI Spuvysy AreuRg|***"** “Snug ‘snoovuorided “spurlsyT ‘yuepunqe|"*pnur pue syoor}"***sueouRdayIpayy| tet otoys|Areueg 07 yeBny1og Jo yynog|"** “Snug ‘snouesso1pay[ ‘WT ‘sumon ‘gen AoA} ste pars] sees ureqtaoun|:*: sMLOyIeE YQ pue gel ayliouay, ‘sra18Ty sriseeresese yoga “eqeaqyeq *yaeul ‘oaea|"* PHU pu purs|-uLy pue pULTPION|"** swMOYZE QE] 07 OE|"''** YAVUMUTY puL pULTPION |e t+ UaaoT ‘apRATT ‘yanaTy ‘CipaSueyy, *(panunjuo2) CPOCO.1AgSBx) ——— | ——$__— ————— ————_ “syremey “fouonbory “punory “yuomdojaaep [edro -urd Jo Aqv007] "aBueI [ROI A -aduet [eormdeiso0an *soroadg 130 131 ON MOLLUSCA OF THE NORTH-EAST ATLANTIC, ETC. pue Buoy ‘1opeSoyy 3e suo} soyerapom|*ss*"*"***"** pues “+ kTorg *yuenbaaj|‘** pnt puv pues|"* ** aeqyeaquy ‘ayerapourl'esttsttes' +++ pues seeeseeeeseeneeee OSTA vaea|s eee pupsp ees ureggaoun | “pueyoog pue *poqeurreo ABAION Ul poutezgo | [[e|*- quonbeay|-** pnut pur pues|puejsugq Jo WAON ‘s}UoUIseay pue sffays Sunok poureyqo Ajuo oavy]::: oxen Atoal tts" ‘ayerapoull*** “yuepund "yasugy Ur sayour $p]-*+*++** ovals: seseoeses soe TBAT, see pUeEZ * B98 O01 ‘aupal stents ttt pues \. verses TT MOUYUN “quepunqe|’ poo pue syooal*******"*** YIeULUTY cgaeg}eer seers see pueg|ts esses ureyzaoun *yeoo]|"]9Ava3 pue pues|*****+ +++" ULeZZa0UN, -auea|’ ss terete + pues} ots oreyza0un “‘quepunge syoo.r7p pnu‘pues| AeMi0N ‘pueyoog | -gaea Aroalter ttt: syooa}rsss"*""** TMOUyUN ‘yuepunge|paem pur samojs|**********"""* ued URIULIIOJIPI, VY} UL UIs 4Oul"** yUepuNqe)"** pues puw yoor}****-"**"""* satteueD “yuepunqe|!** puol pue pues} sss" FOBT A ‘quoubeag)** prox pue pues)" “os F eBeyey isle quanbaay prettseeesereee nupsls**** BOTIBALAIIPI TN | -quonboay|**+ puur pue purs|****-‘uvaueroypayy “momen | | Aueul sv WO‘g SoTaLIeA youNsTP aay) ‘yeooy| ttt sst* paul trreeeesseeesSQTIBURO) -2y ¥ ‘sn3e yz, ou} ur SUIOYIVY. (I4| ae? ameaif steers se pares sreseeeeeres TUMMOULAUN } | “SoLIew | ‘yuepunge|’ seu0ys pur purs|-ep pues sreqyeIqiy “yuepunge]’** pnt pue pues)*****“uvaueLtayrpayA, “pues pue ‘ ‘ “quep Age pnut ‘sauo sg‘ 1901) to taaeereenewes TRAC | see eowrseeree STOT}LT gil" eobearesebeseceerecseas spoIg sooeseees ‘wT ‘snuesnoertg “1199 STOUIBE ET 0} 8 pes WRIULAIOITPITY PUL ZEPVO| "eres reesee “wT ‘snour0o “SUIVT QT 02 TOIUAL MOT| TTT tet Tee TTT eeeee OSTA Leese ewuT “sntreIyOD “** SULOTIVT OOL 0} OF yAVUMUTY ‘vag YONI st ewayD ‘snordoATON ‘sree stORT Of 0} Glcct* seas OOTY OP UIERAg] ts wunT ‘sanbyUe “"* SULOtyeF OS OF OGI"**""" pULpjoZ puv vag YRON|*** "Suzy ‘sisuotortIOg “+ SuIONIR} OOT OF OF/PULEZ 07 pur[suq Jo yNOg]"-"**"*** “agp ‘sunbutdord SULOILT OOT OF Gl tert yavUMUT 07 UTEMAg|******"* wys09 vq ‘sIowrs eeeceeeee SULOyyey ooT Fanicg eac-euerieentat “O77 JAVULUL seseweree may) ‘snorpue]sy | ‘upT ‘Sustyy trteeeweeres STULOUIES Pisces tees soleus ‘lopedoy\ on BOGE LK (2.44 “ds sere rerogaTy|s** sereteeeeeene rpUETOTT| ttt appar ‘cunauvso ‘aded: Y}10 Np “+ SULOUIVF OST 0F OE|2YI 0} UoyMOTG Jo Mog] ****s pou ‘auuTosIsny “+ guloyseE 6 OF GT yxeCUUTY ‘puepyjez|zaunag ‘mnuersforydompy “++ SMIOTILE OGL OF OG/ tests swung] et fiquamog “¢ ‘aye “purys *sMIOYILP OST OF DLOYS|-U Jo TINOG oF seas oyoay) UIT “UMyepuN “wT ‘umuLong tee eneee . (peop) aroys] sre eetteest ts AreUeC) PRU fees see ee oo ds: ‘Wnt CXG9IOT, aLoYs|* opesoyy 07 uiedg Jo yQION|"*"********" AYO “CANTNITUOD- Peertersseeererens OTOUS pon soLreurd ‘jopesoyy ‘arpeg, sereeseee 79uLKD ‘outages v"** SULOUPES OS OF 8)" “+ Jopesoyy 04 O81, “pp “PV “eyetoseyiny “+s goroyqey OT 0} ptt ttt aeypeaqny pue esupeyy| ees Ty ‘euelZ “** suIONIeE g 0} LOYS|*** UVoUROWpoy pue zipeg|* “MAT “BoptTaT SULOYJEF B OF FI" “uvouelia}Ipay “* urT ‘syTqeynoL “eITapeyy pur ‘gormeueg ‘eurssayy ‘StoISpy|*s*'** syoooug ‘eoryecustad: . Iopesoyy, pue uogsvy sent eee eerssetegeeees “pau ‘ds: *Spux|s] VLlopeyy pue “---smouges p ‘axoys|Areueg 07 UvauBLTaypoyy| ttt “UROUVLIIY Tp 0} puxpsug Jo yy see ee ter eeeeseree seeeee SMIOUILT OF 04. 02 SUIOYIEE OZ PUE F)" yee 4d ‘sqeyes. igiesstspetess ‘mw ‘eoomdid. see SULOUIRT GL OF FI ny ATonsInny i * STOMP ne ATS EGE UL a OT, oe sgrea|seereereee us| g spuLysy ATeUBD)"** SULOTTEF OG 0} OZ romea] st eeesee este PUBS *urez120un|"** *9qeal" * pues} stots ureyzeoun ‘oye19poul|* sreseeeeserrnrle searozy UIB}Ia0Ult * spuvysy Arewep|* “UD T “eyeBIAR] ‘MDT “eT[aUey SMOYILE OF 0} OZ]"** Satozy pur Areuey puBly| **********eyT ‘snsoraqny Cesaeqeeseessse TOUS * BITIpe I, ‘kreueg purer . season serenT ‘stearid ahs age a10Ys|" sa1ozy ‘UvoUeLIOyIpayy yseq|"***** “wT ‘snye[notqosos eorpa ret eceeteseeeesees | seeeeeeessHTBTTQOUN . peap) ar0ys|" seereee rpareaquy]’ seseeee 3 say ‘snteayo *978.10poul “urez120UN (peap) a10ys|***spueysy Areued 07 seringsy] tt *** “DT ‘snaovynd ‘oye1apoul seeeees TeqTBAIqLy tteeererees SUIOUJET Bit? WevaUBIIORIPIT 0 OIA, sencesseo en ‘snqeSu1100 *sa10zy pure ‘ellapeyy : sMOYey F 0} LOYS|‘spurysy AreuLD 0} seLINysy|********** *euNT ‘sNa;tpou *YOMDUDT ‘HOF, “quanbaag}*** seeepups[ tts seas OOTY|"** SmOMpes OG OF OL\**""“PULTPION ‘yavuurg|(ayompy) “927.0 “e[AprIta "9181 Seid sinees dev aee DUES soceeeeesooe Ta} I90UN see SULOTILF ‘7a 0} ZI *spurysy B.ULOPLIAL pue Areueg . eeeeee ‘pout ‘ds "eIlape Il "9181 POU OSC 1h ** urey190UN waaeee SUIOTILT ba4 04 8 ‘spurysy Areurg ‘reqpearquy emer ances eenseee *paut ‘ds z *9,rea|*** + pom) sees ureyza0Un seevesessees SUTOUILT 8 seaeeeeceeeesesessoneserses SIOISTY sereeersress Mog ‘SITTUIISSE squonbagy|ttrssttettess pnua]’ sraISpy ‘reypeaqiy|****** scTMO|ILF CZ OF F]-** UvoueATOpoT Puw zIpeg| any ‘eyetjaouRes *sauloys ‘wuYT ‘elIe|[aoueD “keg oonyuayy sv yyNos ez sv)" quonbary|pur ‘acrid ‘purs|AeaIoN pauvpueyaz|*** svLoypeF OST OF G)°°-3]tBULUTY Spuepoog Jo "Age aog ‘st[va.0g ‘poug ‘stdoayoyorry, teeeeeesoeee TTB a0UN *** SULOT}ET 00T 0} 0¢ tetececscoccccceoreccses WIBOIUTAI * -q0q ‘snqenoryeso sen eeeeeteee KeMION see SULOY}eT OFT 01 8 set eeeeee yAVUIUT ‘alo UOI ose sreeesee sug QOT ‘auuny seoe? UIBITIG: YMON|"** SWOT, OPT 0} GTipurpsug Jo YIION 0} ABMION|"** UWOZSUYOL ‘SISUIDTATCE, sesrewees RIT nee swoyyey 0S 03 ZI seeeeneee OSTA 0} svas YSsT}Ig see eweree “quot ‘snqyvoLmMul *vaso[suy Jo serereoreess KBMION|*** SULOUJEF OOT 0} GI9SBOI YIION 94} 09 VAG OIGOIY] "ee" "* UT ‘snyeryyeyo “quofyuopy aq ‘uoqdory, sovseeeenees rpaTBAQEg|''''' SULOUILT 0Z 0} 8 ULOULATOIIPO TAL PUB ALIPWA IH] sere eee reeserseets ese “ds teeeeeees UeqIa0UN|' SULOTZEF YZ 0} BOYS] see" *** SpULTST Areueg|****** ‘may ‘snuvooorvat seeeesteeoneres AqwIg seeeeserseee STO qRT Qitereeet*** + wvouerraspayy| 8 22d ‘snyemoryedo *spurys] ‘quanbaay}"** pur pue pues}******s7**** Teyerq|****** SULOTFF OZ OF 8 Axeueg pue uvowerropipayy|*****'**'** 2070 ‘snyzea4sor *spure[sy “yuanbaay|*** pnul pue pues} ***""* LeqeAqTy}"""""* SOYILF OP OF 8 freurg pure uvouetappayy| 24d ‘snyjeqornd “unT ‘Susu *(panurquos) SPOd0.194SBx) eee ererseenetterees “so10ZY ay} WOY “rea TpeuIs L19A v|"* eVrQpou “* PNUL PUB pus) *****??r*e" TLITBAGTS “gapa| essere s+ pues ‘9qyeJapoul|*** pnur pue pues -ayexapour| st **++*+"** pues ‘9qviapoul|*** pnui pus pues REPORT—1856. *quonbaaj|*** put pue pues “yuonbayy|"** pnut pue pues ‘oyvlapoul|*** 70.1 puv pues ‘arel|*** pul pue pues ——_ — eine Ge -quomdoyaaep jedto -urid Jo Aj1[e00T ee *SyIVULIY ‘Aouonbary *punoiy “SURI [LOI A, -aduer peoryders0ay *satoedg 132 133 s) & x sy a B A < | & » & an < fx 1 q & a4 fo) z I q B i) ° <4 o n =) 4 4 ° a Z ° “quepunqe|************"** pues *OqItM)"** 94¢.19poUl|* Sou04s pue 390I “"eIIOpeIN *quonbaay|*es******"**** pues PUL UVOTIRITOIPIT 3S9A\ Ul daval'** guonbaaj|’ pues pue foavss *yuonbaazy "tse" syoOA syuanbaay)"**ss"******** pues ‘spuesy Areueg oY} Ut azIs oF1e]|""* yuonbagy|"** pnw pue pues *pnut “‘quepunge|pue ‘aAvid ‘pues *juanbo.y|"* syoor pue pues soqealter steers DUS “yuonba.y seeeeeenenne SyOOr ‘quepunqelttttt* sxo0r ‘spue[sy Areuep “* spuvysy Arvuep} stsssterrtes* gzoysipue satozy 07 Avostg Jo Aug] errttt*******eup7 “tu0IVg “mDvT ‘ends “epodoreyden vererees UTpargoUN|teerettretereess groys|spueysy Areueg pure vrlepepyl tte sees pout ds ssreeereoees JODBBOT| ttt teeetteeeees aqOYs| ett ereeses* JOpRBoP||*seseeese+#***euyT ‘snsoIOy * ATIOIG pus vyyey|"** sMOyIe; g 07 aIOYS\VNOpePY, PUL UvoUeLIOWpoPy|******'** 2yodOUg “snqe4sTIO uvouel . Jedlepeyy, pue “TOPPA PUL OSIA|* SULOYZeF GT 0} oX0Ys\spurisy AreueD 0} seLMysy|**'** -“hog ‘IspreMpy *so10Zy pue *Xey[CAQI PUB OSTA|****** SMIONIeT OF 07 Fi‘eropepy ‘soLeueg 0} OBIA|***'*****2yaavaq ‘snUTTTeI00 “spurs, Areu ‘og ‘sofdeyy ‘esepepy|"***** smoyye; cE 07 FI-eQ 07 UvoURILOZTpoy, ‘OmVA| s+ -ULT ‘sTIepUeIq “uvau “'T1BOIBIIA pI ]"**'** SULOYIJ g OF F/-VALOYIpoyy pue ‘zrpeo ‘oreg| es wr ‘sntnounsy ‘eIIapeI PUe SOTAeU “eeeee" QI0YS ‘OSTA|’ SMIONILE OE 07 BIOYS|-2O ‘uLoUvIIOZIpayy ‘UIEPLIG| 8s wT ‘snodeUTIO ‘WT ‘xo, weer eeree ure}1900N steerer nene SUMOT YLT OF HOP emer eee aeeeeeetsrereee PIP IAL Oo “pong ‘TIqIaMog “psofquoyy ‘smd y, sreereeeerecoree Ta zoqatT | treteeeeeseeseeenpaterIantpayy| ett hog ‘nusiq10,d “'Ryey pue Apiorg *S010ZY pue ULIUULI} pay ieee ata) (2) (9)!11117 | pee so10zy 0} UvIUeIMOZIpoyy|""*"*" eer” “UDT ‘esomovul 134 REPORT—1856. Additional Odservations which could not be conveniently embodied in the foregoing Table. Saxicava arctica, Zin.—Absent from no district within the range of my re- searches, but is much more frequent and larger in the northern than in the southern latitudes. The large solid variety, now living only in the Arctic seas, is found dead (fossil?) in deep water on the coasts of Scotland. Gastrochena modiolina, Zam.; Gastrochzena cuneiformis, Zam.—Not ha- ving been able to detect any specifie difference between the British spe- ‘cimens and those from the south of Europe, I treat them as identical. In the Canaries the specimens are smaller and inhabit greater depths than in other localities. Ceratisolen legumen, Zin.—Is of much smaller size in southern localities ; frequent at Malaga, but not eastward in the Mediterranean. Donax anatinus, Zam.—I have dredged abundantly from 15 fathoms on the Dogger Bank, a remarkable exception from its ordinary habitat. Donax venustus, Poli.—Is closely allied to Donax anatinus, of which it takes the place at Lisbon, Mogador and in the Mediterranean ; in latter associated with D. trunculus. Tellina solidula, Pulteney.—Is reported to be frequent in the Mediterranean, but I have never met with it south of Britain. Mactra subtruncata, Da Costa.—There are two distinct varieties (? species), the one larger, solid and strongly rudely striated concentrically, is sub- littoral, and most abundant on some of the Scottish shores; the other, small, smooth and thin, is more generally distributed, both as regards depth and climate. Venus striatula, Don.—On the Mediterranean coasts of Spain and to the southward, it is comparatively rare and confined to deep water; in the British seas it frequents all the zones of depth. Astarte arctica, Gray.—A valve obtained from west of Zetland, 50 fathoms, by Prof. E. Forbes and myself, and recorded in the ‘ British Mollusca,’ is in my possession, and I have every reason to believe it to be fossil. The reasons which induce me to believe that this species is not an actual inhabitant of the British seas are, that it is a shallow-water species, very gregarious, and not met with on the coast of Norway, south of the Arctic Circle. Astarte compressa, Mont.—Subject to great variety in form, size, &e. I be- lieve A. Banksti to be only a variety of this species. Kellia suborbicularis, Mont.—I incline to think that there are tWo species in- - cluded under this name, if not, they are well«marked varieties ; the one smaller, more orbicular and more pellucid; the other much larger, more elliptical and, when fully grown, less transparent. It is the last which is found imbedded in very fine mud contained iu dead bivalves. Cardium edule, Ziz.—Varies greatly in size, form, number of ribs, &e. Near Tunis a narrow neck of land divides the bay from a shallow salt- water lake, at the head of which the city of Tunis is situated ; on the one side of this neck of land (that facing the bay) all the specimens of Car- dium edule were strong, triangular, and with few ribs, while on the side towarils the lake, they were thinner, wider and much more numerously ribbed. The northern varieties attain the largest size. : Modiola Petagnee, Seaccht.—In shallow water in the harbour of Carthagena, ON MOLLUSCA OF THE NORTH-EAST ATLANTIC, ETC, 135 free. In the Canary Islands, at 12 to 15 fathoms, small and distorted, imbedded in Nullipore. Crenella discors, Zin.—The largest British specimens I have obtained were on the north coast of the Isle of Man, 10 fathoms. At Southampton the pale green variety is frequent about low-water mark, adhering to the leaves of Zostera marina. Near Tromsoe in Finmark it is most abundant in beds covering the under surfaces of ledges of rock. Though reported to be found in the Mediterranean I have not met with it south of the British Channel, and believe it to have been confounded with C. costu- lata by Mediterranean authors. Lithodomus caudigerus, Sow.—The authors of the ‘ British Mollusca’ state that this is a South American species. It is frequent on the coast of Asturias, Bay of Biscay, also at Faro in the south of Portugal, at low water burrowed in limestone rocks, but not found in the south of Spain or Mediterranean, where its place is occupied by Z. dactylus.. I have never obtained them together in any locality. Pecten Jacobzeus, Zin.—Notwithstanding that this species is named after the Saint of Compostella, I have not been able to detect it on the coasts of Galicia, or the north of Spain. Pecten Danicus, Chem.—This species would appear to have been formerly much more abundant on the west coasts of Scotland than it is at pre- sent, as the number of dead valves bears no proportion to that of living specimens. It is met with throughout the Hebrides, but is most fre- quent in Loch Fyne, the normal form in mud at about 70 fathoms, the smaller and strongly striated variety upon hard ground at about 40 fathoms. It is extremely rare in Finmark, and I only met with small dead specimens north of Drontheim. Pecten Islandicus, Miller —tIs doubtless extinct in the British seas, though dead valves are frequent in the Firth of Clyde, Hebrides, Zetland, Murray Frith and North Sea. In Norway, north of Drontheim, it is by far the most abundant species of Pecten. = Anomia ephippium, Zin.— Unlike most testaceous molluséa, which only re- quire to be better known to be esteemed as delicacies for the table, the Anomia is not to be eaten with impunity. On one occasion, having sent my yacht round from a neighbouring port to that of Villaviciosa in Asturias, where I purposed joining her after an excursion inland, my crew, having been told that there were oysters in the harbour, determined to dredge on their own account in miy absence, and procured abundance of thé Anoniia in large agglomerated masses. Seeing by the complexion of the animals that they wee not conimion oysters, only oe of the men would venture upon eating them, and he suffered in consequence severe Voiiliting, &é@., with swelling of the abdomen, from which he did not The most beautiful yellow and purple varieties are found in the sunny seas of the Mediterranean. Ostrea edulis, Zin. —Subject to much variation, which has occasioned the - making of one or two questionable species, and rendered uncertain the limits of its distribution. The common English or Welsh oyster is, how- ever, certainly abundant and of excellent quality at Redoiidela, situated at the head of Vigo Bay ; and I have likewise dredged it off Cape Trafalgar in sand, and off Malaga in mud, but have not noticed it further eastward in the Mediterranean. j entirely recover for two or three days. § Chiton fascicularis, Zin.; Chiton discrepans, Brown.—I must acknowledge my inability to discriminate satisfactorily between these species. 136 REPORT—1856, Chiton cancellatus, Sav.—ls more nearly allied to C. Rissot of the Mediter- ranean than to C. asellus, of which it has been supposed to be a variety. Chiton fulvus, WWood.—This fine species differs as much in its habits as in appearance from its European congeners. It enjoys greater powers of locomotion than any other Chiton of my acquaintance, creeping freely in the sand between tide marks in Vigo Bay, where it is very abundant, and where several were found adhering to the chain cable every time it was raised from our anchorage abreast of the town of Vigo. It is, nevertheless, extremely local, not recorded to be obtained in any locality but those I have named, unless from Patagonia, whence there are spe- cimens in the British Museum under another name, but in no way to be distinguished from the present species. Chiton Cajetanus, Poli.—Inhabits the Mediterranean and Bay of Biseay, but has not been detected in any intermediate locality, nor on the south coasts of Spain. Patella vulgata, Zin.—Becomes a local species on the northern coasts of Norway, and J did not meet with it in Finmark. Patella pellucida, Zin.—The distribution of this species is regulated by that of the Laminaria, on which it feeds. It is not unfrequent in the north of Spain; is absent from the south of Spain and Mediterranean, but unexpectedly appears again in the harbour of Mogador, where it is of small size. In high northern latitudes it is much paler in colour. Patella Gussonii, PAil—Among some hundreds of dead specimens I only took one or two living, and these were upon a deep-water red fucus. Calyptrea Sinensis, Zin.—I have never obtained British specimens in less than 8 or 10 fathoms, whereas on the coasts of Spain it is generally found about the sea margin, and in shallow water. Trochus crenulatus, Phil.—I believe to be specifically distinct from 7. ea?- guus, is subject to great variation in colour; the grey variety is more common to the eastward. Trochus millegranus, Phil—Of this species there are two very distinct varieties, of which the smaller and more conical inhabits the Mediterra- nean and south coast. of England and Wales, while the larger is common to the north-west coasts of Britain and Norway. Rissoa abyssicola, Forbes.—A specimen received from Captain Spratt, dredged by him in 350 fathoms, about 40 miles from Malta. Turritella communis, Aisso—The ordinary British form is wider in propor- tion and possesses fewer volutions than that of the Mediterranean. A large variety with numerous volutions is found in Cork Harbour and in Bressa Sound, always in shallow water, while the ordinary variety in- habits all the zones of depth. I have taken white specimens of both the forms, consequently absence of colour is not always the consequence of great depth. Conus Mediterraneus, Brug.—lIs very frequent at Lancerotte, but does not extend westward to Teneriffe or to the Salvage or Madeira Islands. Purpura lapillus, Zi2.— Though generally littoral, inhabits the depth of 8 or 10 fathoms in certain localities, and in these cases undergoes consider- able ‘modification of form; from deep water and mud, it is large and fusiform, from 8 fathoms and rough ground the specimens are beauti- fully imbricated. Ringicula auriculata, Wenke—At Vigo, the northern limit of its range, it attains the greatest dimensions and is very abundant, but not striated as in the Mediterranean and Madeira. , Nassa trifasciata, A. ddams.—Most abundant at Vigo, but smaller than in ——. = ON MOLLUSCA OF THE NORTH-EAST ATLANTIC, ETC. . 137 the Mediterranean ; in latter district it undergoes considerable variation in colour. Fusus gracilis, Da Costa.—Notwithstanding the opinion of Middendorf, adopted by Forbes and Hanley, that this is only a variety of L’. Islandicus of Chemnitz, I am quite satisfied of the contrary after obtaining the true Fusus Islandicus in the neighbourhood of the North Cape. It was from about 100 fathoms, and measured 43 inches in length, while adult specimens of Fusus gracilis from the same locality did not measure more than 2,4, inches in length. Spirula Peronii, Zam.—This shell, possessing a peculiar aptitude for floating on the surface of the sea when dead, is liable to be drifted to localities very remote from its native habitat. A chance specimen has occasion- ally been picked up on the shores of Britain ; on the south coast of the Bay of Biscay it is still rare, is more frequent at Gibraltar and Malaga, and abundant in the Canary Islands. I am not aware of its having been found in the eastera Mediterranean. The following Table will be of assistance in a comparison of the Geographi- cal range of the species and the number obtained in each of the districts. Species. | Northern Scandinavia (Finmarkand Nordland). Drontheim. Scotland. British Channel. North of Spain. Portugal. South of Spain and Mediterranean. Mogador. Canary Islands. Madeira. Azores Acephala. Xylophaga, Z'urton. dorsalis, Turton...cccsseeeeese Pholas, Lin. Cactylus, Lin.....cseccssecereeee|eccees parva, Lam....... dgaectacabnd tap |seatreoltine ats s0si6| =e squamosa, Lam.......sersereeelees sulcata, Brug.....csceeees COLDIS RE Vili wosecncckiconekaons Isocardia, Lam. Gael) Meeacsepcacenoc Jectacy HC Noe Astarte, Sow. AVctica, Gray ...ccccecressecree sulcata, Da Costa ...++0-.4... compressa, Mont. .....+..000 triangularis, Mont... incrassata, Brocchi .......+- fusca, Desh. ...... crebricostata, Fordes......... elliptica, Brown........ss000+- bipartita, PHil. ..0....cseceees sp. ined. Circe, Schumacher. Minima, Mont. ...ccccsseccoes Cyprina, Lam. Tslandica; LAN. sccccessensaees Galeomma, Turton. MATEO p WOW i.cusecsesnes «cases Lepton, Jurton. squamosum, Mont. .....4...|.+ convexum, Alder ........000- Montacuta, Turton. substriata, Mont. ferruginosa, Mont... bidentata, Mont. ........005. Kellia, Turton. suborbicularis, Mont. corbuloides, Phil. .....+.. complanata, Phil. ....... Drontheim. ote eee * * * * feb eee * weeeee * Scotland. * British Channel. eeaeee weeeee seteee serene * teseeeles seeeee seeeee sees eeenee * North of Spain. * * scence seeeee seeeee se eeee seenee eeeeee * Portugal. seeeee South of Spain and Mediterranean. a : | 3 ~ . i>) Ss is] . gia] a] s iJ = oO a ee s|/|/Si¢4 2a/|s/ie cs i) Kx * * * * seceee * * 7 i ‘ . ON MOLLUSCA OF THE NORTH-EAST ATLANTIC, ETC. 141 ta =i 3 as| 3|4 ag| | 4 Beles ig! es) ease] elal-. S24) Se a|2)/G\asia|/al a] s : ao| S18 io || Ss eB) Ss ie io | & Species. el Ad fol ey ieee | Be es SY eee Pel ele) a leSielsaisa|sisi3 a 5 A = 3 ~ | £8 a |4 ae 3) og s A Fe a Acephala, (continued). Kellia, Turton. TUDra, Monts ..ccorsrccarecsece[oseserfeccevel 2K | % lesesesfrcseccfeceseeleceees! ok | ¥ Pythina, Hinds. NPIMCO ste ceeds cateessaracteceees|rcneen|ceoter|ssenes|sacnee|() Bo NLT lneeteel|) Ungulina, Daudin. Q Oblonga ?, Daudin...cecrseree|ectersleceeee|sccce[seeteelenssselesseee| 2% Diplodonta, Brown. Totundata, Mont. ....cecccceeleecseslacccoelecrees| F [evvase| eae reea * APICAIIC, ORG... scncevacnvercsen|ovenselsevass|cscesn|ectinae|sosbeo[ssnsbel AE lweunree|e ae) [hook Lucina, Bruguiére. [ABECANNY E27%. wevecscencdensecs| F(R | OX | R olscecdelensese] BN | AE spinifera, Mont. ....c...ceseeee|eeoeee] KF | & | # | R | ow | oe | oe | & | x divaricata, Lin. .. edie Niele astetvel Semicett cer eouleceicealte sk Fe ssa hae * flexuosa, Mont. ....0scee..se0e| * * * Se CL (es * Teucoma, Turton ......ceesscfecessrlecseesleceees| 2 * * * ok * Sarsii ?, Phil..secsccccesceveeee] * ferruginosa, Forbes .........) * | * | * TUETTARALECHE!” Scleosdeascecnie|sevceelsccscslecaagclessevalsasee=|scaces|| Columbella, Lam. .ccccscesres|svsees/ecesse|,crves|seeses[ooesrelseveec|ecceesloovieas|’ oF DUAVISVELSA, Liles ns sevcse ss dtas|s> 05]. 0c8ce|, cena |evheenlsnsaelysveeelsedduclobestel” oe digitalis, Lin......0... seeeeelere aabiewe|| Re 1 ake pecten, Lam, ......cccccseeverslerseeslevceee|sesccsleccees| KF |eeveae] 2 fovseee) | 3K ST SEE Ae a Bee ee ind cee Moueod nosed acecoc besece badecd pe sced Cloned Goosen * RMRIMEM Reh. acdaceccrcee teed: heb sda|etestec| sens suloetoeciityssslewsseelveases aoe eeel Me nee f ieee SP. INEM. ? ....ccssscecveceseees| : Cardium, Lin. ‘ evinaceum, Lamm. ......coeces[ecees|ccscesleevacs[ecesce[ecteeslenvens| 2K aculeatum, Lin. ...cosscssvsass[eeeses[evececlecsecs| 2% feeeeee] oo | 3% echinatum, Lin.... ea) dR oY okas Ic ofens | See Wray cow soe st a sate] hak Tusticum, Lin. ..rcccsececeess[eeeeee|ceveveleceeee] * Hh +)| RP | tatatorer!| OK Ciliare, Penn. ...ccc..cceceeceeeler cctsleeoenal Ke es cemel Odile, Lin. .svcccesecssencsscens * oa x | * | * nodosum, Turton —....s.00 * * fasciatum, Mont. ... ceemy ie 8 lh “Sep SRR Seb SRE vet + es te] a Se ee poke oe * * * Peleeeeerles pygmzum, Don. ... Suecicum, Reeve ....ce..000-| * | * Norvegicum, Spengler ......|sesessleccese| 2 | 2K |ecesesleweeee MAPWOSUM, Pole \...ceseccve:|scoeeslasasecleveccalecsdns| FP] & punctatum, Brocchi seness|ecsaiea|cocesfecsens|ocsace|enaees minimum ?, Phil. ...... retie's| aateie| oes os] etteiosl|-..c os 5) eee * * * * * * * A a Pe * * Tite Hoek Bacee een cac ee Chama, Lin. BTV PHOIGER; Aves $2 Ao. cctvivs|eeorvaleateeslevwass|cavaeeloavaeelcoages|’ oe Peale Solemya, Lam. Mediterranea, L070. ....c.000|--cascleccsselsceses|esnacs|ecsseslcccass| oF levees] 3X j Yoldia, Méller. pygmza, Munster .........-| * | * | * lucida, Bland....... limatula, Say ......sssccsesseee Leda, Schumacher. caudata, Don. ...... 142 REPORT—1856. ) / Northern Scandinavia Finmarkand Nordland Species. Mogador. Portugal. South of Spain and Drontheim. Scotland. British Channel. Mediterranean. Canary Islands. Madeira. North of Spain. ¢ \ ns a aS. Es aS aS es Acephala (continued). Leda, Schum. Emarginata, Lars serreceersasleceess|screerlernres[esesszlennsee] Sit YOCTIN eee SRB RSE | RB eed SOP BAr Aaraee samaiedbuewenet cosas Nucula, Zam. HHCICUM TCT sancccessangscercae oF | oe f ok ok TUNG, WOW) caccuss ngocsuapvestereces|eatsss|.. * * * * * I % * MAGIA LAIICY. .a.cccccteosseafoceraslecesecfooees GECUBRAGAy SOW. sss ccpercsedenclisansslenees| tenuis, Monté...,,...eseceasese| * * * corticata, MGller .....,.00...) * Limopsis, Sassi. Pygmea, PHIL. cccsecsceseneee| ¥ Pectunculus, Lam. glycimeris, Lim. ..rcccacersrecelreeree|eesere] * * * eR * violascens, Lam. : Siculus, Reeve .. sa Sie tacalecan cate ca take ec DMOSUST LOM. Cearccsasgaresog{nessoctnosesale Re ser He [eh Hy | [scboas|esesed|tacece|eewwselcadeen|™ HUN Cylichna, Lovén. cylindracea, Pen. ............ * | # | | KR | KF [eel HH | KR | KR | ® truncata, Mont..............06 eee lh aeees|| OF + * * * * * Obtusa, Mont. ........seecscs[eceveleceees| 2 | umbilicata, Mont. ..........0. * * * * Hh lesevse * fragilis, Jeffreys.......... dsebaleacuat aedsdeleccdac|ecomedleeoscalsaceealth eadlescedde mr alba, Loven.......cscescsceseoes * | x Akera, O. F. Miiller. Flanleyi, 4.40. ..sssccccocecselroeveclacscccl Bulla, Lin. AIG Peis << sheowsadsccsdals-nenc|accsactesvsen|) 3% * * * MEEPHUIMEI SN aetex bes otceuis sti daside [eee aaallsacsnalens ssa lacsmaalasdaes[caseonfiececseceutalle RULE PAR. deeac sac vcesedaldadceclecdse| as sedlvdseaelecsevalsveeuel stcxealeedeee| (rR Tornatella, Lam. fasciata, Lam....ccc.scccseeeeee| | * * * * * * Auricula, Lam. alba, Jeffreys ..cscercccscecseeelecceceleceees] EA lwacvwalwvsewe|sasceslvccucelansecs|atecasth oF Ferminii, Payr......sssecseeee[ee deal aca] fodtae| eaesten|pcmrcefeceeee|sccess|eneceal 3 Pedipes, 4danson. BEetisesswontst'ssaseanevepossecea|tecdes|te-sPdlcadess|ccevaclercwen|sapeee|cacocelecsscs| We Iececedlh ok Chiton, Lin. fascicularis, Lin. .s..00... discrepans, Brown......... f |" Hanleyi, Bean .........006 wee] 8 ruber, Lin....... negeneeee Saaaeia| eae Cinereus, Lin..........0. vstceega| wok PUDUR; PA, ...sccvccvvcacsessces| asellus, Chem. .ceccccscecesee| Cancellatus, Sow. .....ceee.e[ecee levis, Pen. .....c..0000. eporesstbe marmecreus, O. Fab. .....0... BME SIV COG. «ane cencnvovesa|povess|eoctacloortee|s sates * | * Cajetanus, Poli ..........5- Bey ee eee Ae EADS) HOACO || isesaell (cee ks BESROI LAUT) bs. adustssaveevde lessee este eeects ewssesfees'veu|seoee| Siculus, Gray.....c..eeee cvceeeleceees seeceeleeceeelsecens[seeseeloceees| ay Poli, Phil. ......... Badosehces Saisaciuulnovwas|sactes|bacwex|eessen|usveeeh. °K | Canariensis, Webb & Berth. |...00.Jccocsefeccees|ecceee|eeeeee|ecsons] dierelveecadl * alveolus, Sars....cccescesvereee| | OK 146 Species. Gasteropoda (continued). Dentalium, Lin. entalis, Lin. ...sesccissseee tarentinum, Lam. rubescens, Desh. BY. WEG. cecdsovess Bosra. sveNne Pe. BPs MME. ds. dhs ts ectsclessceases Siphonaria, Poli. Algesirh, Quoy, <.i....ssveo0>.|s rae Gadinia, Gray. Garnoti, Payr. ..1..4s..0ce00-}s ATED 2S AGRAY no casickss@se Neate Acmea, Eschscholtz. testudinalis, Miiller ......... virginea, Miiller...coscsesseae Lepeta, Gray. aricyloides, Forbes.........++. Ceca, Muller ...cibscases.sencs Pilidium, Forbes. fulvum, Miiller .....c...0c000 Patella, Lin. Villgatia, Lats ..ccsdscsncsboness cerulea, Lam. athletica, Bean .....6...4.- Pra eeeae ae ancl} BE crenata; D’ Ord....i.0-.0.% Fiend | tes enlba cane guttata, D’Ord......... Geewes|boease aspera, Lam. .es.sscossees vesteclboctes Lowei, D’ Ord. .... cose|ieesnele scutellaris, Lam. . be etes Candei, D’ Orb. .... tenuis, Dillwynn . Gussonii, Costa ...... nigropunctata, Lam. .........]. pellucida, Litt. .scsccccctoeces Pileopsis, Lam. Hungarica, Lin............0065 Crepidula, Lam. unguiformis, Lam gibbosa, Defr. ........sbeeees|.. Calyptrea, Lam. Sihensi8, Litt.s....écecesctessee Emarginula, Lam. reticulata, Sow. ......scesseees rosea, Bell ...... crassa, J. Sow. .. elongata, Costa ....s..s6..0000|> pileolus, Michaud ......4..... SPP AMCCsiocee-wovcesosehtales ==: Puncturella, Lowe. Noachitia,..Z4M. v.ivcscvstesces Fissurella, Lam. } eo OF dentalis, Zin. ...... Thee Ses Seer seeeeeraeterle REPORT—1856. Northern Scandinavia (Finmark and Nordland). Drontheim. * * * ete eleesbes weehee reticulata, Dbnscideccccstccece|bass sel ieeees rosea, Lam. ... Scotland. British Channel. * thw eel eenene Pree eee seeneelece weeeee * sleereee North of Spain. sleeeeee k sveeslece * . sesces sesteeleweeee seeseels ee esteelees seebee * beeeee ao] a. as . ao alee ol as 5S img He lw 2 eee 33 =) nN eee eeel Mogador. seeeeeleetaee * eae le Dussae| aki aleee * * slesseee sleeeeee * * Sovvecleeeese| eeeee aeeeee eet lewetee sebeee Canary Islands. Madeira. *? x ¥ % * sevees{eveees| OF * ON MOLLUSCA OF THE NORTH-EAST ATLANTIC, ETC. 147 Species. Scotland. Mogador. Madeira. Azores Portugal. South of Spain and Northern Scandinavia (Finmarkand Nordland). Drontheim. British Channel. North of Spain. Mediterranean. Canary Islands. Gasteropoda (continued). issurella, Lam. PADRE HEED) Ver save lave dsvanee|osres«|sethes/scakss|seesa« x | | x lesen] oF Tanthina, Lam. COMMuNIS, Lam. ..rsecseseeelsccece|enseeeleaes nalkogagelhcacailbaaaee|eopaelaness Joe | oe |x PTolongata, Blainv. ..-....c.[eccece[eceses|ececee|seeeeelacesceleceees KE feweeeelecees | exigua, MRITAs stack vchwedsiapiels sase|ees salesmen’ Nancas ees evaleasncals ey a One *# * * RPE MOCC NCES Bec Wes (00 oc Pop usta Sdnwesk| bacnceleqndealeceses * Scissurella, D Ore. crispata, Flem. ....ceeecce.| % | | Bertheloti, D’Ord....... Pee vale cerca Ganieuprosne dubius?, Phil. ............006]- PRY ERS ERAS RE as ee * Sanguineus, Lin. ..ccsscesess{eoveveleceees see ee SR SS * MANCUS, PHIL... cbs. csvqcsvacs|eoen cote epee aca ay Hes een O ee BE Bertheloti (Monodonta), |......Jsesss[eoeses[ecccee[eceseelecsece[eceeee{enmeen| KF [| oF D’ Orb. 148 .REPORT—1856. Species. Northern Scandinavia (Finmarkand Nordland) Drontheim. Scotland. British Channel. North of Spain. Portugal. South of Spain and Mediterranean. Mogador. Canary Islands. Madeira. Azores. Gasteropoda (continued). Phasianella, Lam. PULLS EAR: Mrdecdeese theses as +|dacts «tcl suee|ia * * * * * * * * intermedia, Scacchi ......00.|..0.. Vieux, Payrssiecsoseusbevsees Turbo, Lin. PUPOSUB, LAI. scaaca soe sou seeces|vveee|seeseu|ewesselesdeee|! 2 || cae J avaees |lecay | Mean mee le te SPINE. .....cs00 Neritina, Lam. Truncatella, Lowe. truncatula, Drap. .. Skenea, Flem. planorbis, O. Fab. ......c0000.) * | | x BPs "ccnecesscevicerecresecstriews'e'y) Mick +] / Pak BPs sccecesseveceseavoessceccorese[esoese|ececes|ecsscc|srsevelovcess|eccescleecvesleccoos| | oF Rissoa, Frem. striatula, Mont. ......,..e0000e|... MACLEOD, OM ECh mete scviewesbenseeltvaas:|Motswclhecdes Renigeol fr ll baaeeal Oe a erts Hetlandica: Mont. \, ccaestecsee|ssaacel ace. crenulata, Mich. ...ssecsesss|oecees Beanii, Hanley ....,...ceeseee|eeeeee abyssicola, Forbes ........00eseeesee [eee calathus, Forbes & Hanley...|...... anod pcr PTANMALA PEt. wesdetereercess|iyeeel BCU tay PAI, saves odeesswevaes|\elove punctura, Mont. ......:6606- costata, Adams .......c0se00ee|. striata, Mont...... * * | parva, Costa ....... ia ety |e < interrupta, ddams......... sJececcelecceee| sleceecclevsees| Costulata, Alder ........cecevesleesees|as * rufilabrum, Alder ............ balsas |emaeaal) oe * ‘labiosa, Mont. ....ecsceeeeeeele * Semistriata, Mont..........e.eJeeeee| rubra, Alder ...... wedecew eae cingillus, Mont. HB |vcceee| Fo 'fececsef ue Beats |bsatticalcs Bee liste Cecong) acrnae parade bree |e seeveeleccerclesecesleceees!| violacea, Desm..... monodonta, Bivon.. Bruguieri, Payr. auriscalpium, Lin. . Montagui, Payr. ..... Desmarestii, Forbes ........- Canariensis, Webb & Berth. Ce eed * Ble ACU te crecteodiaeeeesnesiesetes| te Spy. IMeWewanasescsenteattssoses Mlcstewal ee 8/5 ede eesccse ) mM seet eel eeceeei eet te * seer] HF Jecceee| oe] OF seeeee seeeee seeeee seeeee eeeeee eooeee sleceees| 7% * * K lecesceleceece * * * * tarts seeecelseeteelscnaes Madeira. * HK * Azores. 150 ; REPORT—1856. Species. Northern Scandinavia (Finmark and Nordland): Drontheim. Scotland. British Channel. North of Spain. Portugal. South of Spain and Mediterranean. Mogador. Canary Islands. Madeira. Azores. | | | | | | | | | | | | Gasteropoda (continued). Turritella, Zam. communis, Risso ..........., * | * | * | * | * | & | we | & triplicata, Brocchi .... Mesalia, Gray. IRC VIALS UP ira cs an scotia a cy Ls Sica fapenaafenceds|sasvaefoondea), vx the ain heels striata, 4.44. ...6..0c0+s Aporrhais, Aldrovandus. pes-pelecani, Zin. ............ * | * ] * | * | * | e | pes-carbonis, Brongniart .,.) %* |.e-...| Triforis, Deshayes. AGYGLOR, (OL OME si cohen. acdaanazalacanasfanpannl’-cde-\f aide. lvooordl epeseataidecelswottel eatee meee eek perversa, Brug. ........ Raateubecrsvefadcess|pescosp * * * * * Macandrei, 4. Ad.....2....0..| * | ® Cerithiopsis, Forbes. 4 tubercularis,: Monk: goca..aiasleedeecslecvsssh WP. feces Cerithium, Brug. reticulatum, Costfa....... redvech oe we SR deo ee es tl fk hall ds, cel VRE metula, Lovén ......... x | ars slecccccleceeesleceresleeevee! % leeeeee| Fo leccevs] seceenleceteslegeccclrereeelecccee| KK leceses|seeece| LaCteUnh, CPA ge sonnei deoneac[eseguclisagecbecdticofeesMeclts ects venta: a AUGUSEINUM, FOKGES ....er0...f-osaecfasaccofuasaasleceeesfoesere|ooeens}. ¥ oe] * | vulgatum, Brug........ annaagannsfadansetnedcadranccnp sis: cies ip eceee inna fuscatum, Costa....... i cas scl Benamsafoe® aestecescdprccsatiuesscs| Ff fecsenc| seam Stylina, Flem. Pe isereess--sqn=s ea qnecgacanaanuafresanfosstssIacngueluoaccs},enwwe{ouesst iasendls nett aee Eulima, Risso. POlita, Lin.........cocceerseef * | * | # | | * GIRGOTEE DESI 6s seeet cceenssbvoanche as * | * spurca, Lin......... eee ianakal earaa vanaealpuassels sroveferenee[errene] 2% levenee] pyrum, Zin...... aoe sone anens|senes|ecorssleoeccr[rascsalapceps[essece] ¥. |ascsee] moneta, Lin, sete eeeeeeeer earl eee eeeleeeses seemarlreneerlsceenr|seeee *? secs *? lurida, Lin......... chao cht a Pee eM teen a lcgagen |sapasli te Marginella, Lam. RTLIACCH . -LAN3:\ dup scapsepapasslansabs|peavertocassolasaseslcsnsae|sseess| © * * Clandestina, Brocchi ,,,..+09+|eccees|eceves[ennsee|renere|eeseee| sarees guancha, ED Ov li vixespaagvenna sapenalemanesisccensleassesiccenns|sesneslsorens | eeeeee 152 am oo Sa a 23) 3 a,5| 2 az| S Speci eS pecies. af 8 Beat) o On Alle os Ag ~ Gasteropoda, (continued). Marginella, Lam. secalina ?, Phil. ......cecsesees glabella, Lin. ....sseseeeeeeeves SP. INEM. .0...-scscreevecesecsnce Mitra, Lam. columbellaria, Scacchi ......|. ebeneus, Lam. ......000.+. Savignii, Pay7. ..sssesesesseee|eccee fusca, Swains. lutescens, Lam. ......sss.s000e sleseee seeeee ee toeeeeeeetace slaeetee Zebrina, D! OD. ....cceevsceese|eerces|s.osee SV sMMCC- vesecnsabecd=-c escorts +|heseselsrcens Cymba, Brod. olla, Lin. Lachesis, Risso. Minima, Mont. vecseeresoevees|secveelecsees Defrancia, Millet. pyramidalis, Strom. ......+« linearis, Mont. .... purpurea, Mont. .........00 Phileberti, Michaud.......... Lefroyii, Mich. .........s000+ reticulata, Brown ...+++...++« Bela, Leach. turricula, Mont.....00..seece Trevelliana, Turton ......... mitrula, Loven .......sseecess YOSCA, SAS... .seceeeereeeeeeees Lufa, Mont.....c.ccccccsseeccers septangularis, Mont. .....+... Mangelia, Leach. ?Holbollii, Moller .....+...+6- Pnana, LOven .00..ccersvsceeess teres, FOrbes ...cccscseccvcsees gracilis, Mont. .......0+.s00+ TLE DUA LGN bamaiss esses stein laevigata, Phil. .....sscseceeee brachystoma, Phil. ....,...- striolata, Scacchi .........++- COBLALA ME el: secccrtadsecen cece attenuata, Mont. .........00. elegans, Scacchi.......+s..0++ Vauquelina, Payr... secalina, Phil. ......... graua, Phil. ...... rugulosa, Phil. ... nana, Scacchi...... crispata, Cristof. rudis, Phil........ SP. Weds.c.as0csteae * Peeeselecseee KK * * * seeeee see eeeleceene Sees oo oe seaeeeleseeee Seo CU es slewewee see eeeleseeee BP. NEG. :.sesvedseees atve's| sles BP. UNED......cocesesscreresensseleeveseloevees REPORT—1856. Scotland. British Channel. North of Spain. Portugal. South of Spain and Mediterranean. Mogador. Canary Islands. Madeira. CO res ee seh earleeeeerlsetens OO ee eee eeel seeeeleceeee serene l ereeeleseens seeeesleeeeeslesencsleceees|eetens seccec|roveccleccees|eveves| seeeeslsceveslecveeelessserlseeees seeeecleccoes seeeee nooner Coon rrr or socconleccces| * F |ecevccleceeee| Risiere'erell wivieraiotura'etelnw |pleceiwere'||< * * % lessee] pasesell * * eeeeee seeeee Ps es herr Seeeerleeeeetlesesee Sees ees Pere * *¥ XX KX X * * Beraeeleseeerleeeeeslesases seneesleeteerleceeeclenseee| ed CP ed Pe Pe eeeeeelteeeerleee Azores. t * 4 * x . 4 ‘ 30 ON MOLLUSCA OF THE NORTH-EAST ATLANTIC, ETC. 153 rm rae ai) red Be : : A - eines oe | 8 ae! 3S ase 5 a 3S aa fe S SN TS Fg ES = eV = a = a 2 : =A Cs wn Ss 1a,5| 2 Le uy n (3) a a Ga ite) S| co & — o . av visa |S|/O)/s)s Ez gs 3 | 6 Species s\a/% Sle s| |) >| se] as Pp De a =| =} 62 3 N Sel On| or fina | stil oS Si/Jilai|/s|< 2/4) 7) S| 8.1" sa) | 8 . os £8 fac] aA oe ie) Se! A ‘ Ae Gasteropoda (continued). Mangelia, Leach. SP. INEd.........eeeeeee nivalis, Lovén.....0..0+ . balteata, Beck .....cseeceeees|s Conus, Lin. Mediterraneus, Brug. ...... : papilionaceus, Brug. ......++.|. Columbella, Zam. rustica, Lin. ......s.005 seoeets scripta, Lin. ......scessseeeeess Minor, Scacchi ......ceeeseeee CYibraria, Lin. .....seeesseees Broderipii, Sow. .........+0+]- BPO IMCO..ccasacuesrcascraccesera|e S70) Goadnar Ade aoSecOnOn ee ad ba Dolium, Lam. galea, Lin. ...cersescesesceseess Cassidaria, Lam. echinophora, Lin. ...se..sse0 Cassis, Lam. SulCOSA, LAM....ccccccvessvecslecosce [eres aleaeantal decal lsaeenfes sices Saburon, Lam. ...cocccsseveoels Purpura, Lam. Japillus, Zin. ......sesesesteens heemastoma, Lin. .........65+ viveratoides, Webb & Berth. Ringicula, Desh. auriculata, Mont. ...ccccessesJeseess . Nassa, Lam. reticulata, Lin. ....scccseeeess incrassata, Miller . pygmea, Lam. .... variabilis, Phil. ..... prismatica, Brocchi : mutabilis, Lin. ..... neritea, Lin. ... grana, Lam. ... trifasciata, 4. Ad. .. glaberrima, Gmel.. : corniculum, Olivi. .......ss00e Terebra, Lam. eer sstotesisnasvascssnevesuones Buccinum, Lin. undatum, Lin. ...cccocessceee Dalei, J. Sow. ...cecceesssees Humpbhreysianum, Bennet .. fusiforme, Brod. .........08. cyaneum, Miiller ............ SP- INE. coerseceessseeeeseeneers|evevee Fusus, Lam. Islandicus, Chem. ....00..0...| ¥ Bracilis, COStA sseccovecsereee| propinquus, Alder ........00-Jeseeee DOOUOg nnn nn nos OCOUGs nny vseseslecdesslecdeus| * Roe Goud Coen Gorin seavcelectses| * ele eneslerovenleercceleseseaiescece a[eceeeslsececelescene| 7K leseeee seeeesleceeeelecresslsccesaiessenn{eeere rls Pe ees Cd ed rd is vecees| * 154 REPORT—1856. gs ee : z 2s 3| 4 a¢ #4 S'2| g a | 3 agi .|% = S| & cs a i srs 8] # 3s aeZzil ev S s Ss AE S | 5 a ee || eee eS Zh sie j me) sea. | St o | s la Bl is Species. a § S/Slalea]8 fsSi P| Fe ° io) = sz/5 [2/2 5 GleSia| a ad = S 3 fg a | 3 o Se a Ar ~~ Gasteropoda (continned). Fusus, Lam. Berniciensis, King. antiquus, Lam. ..., Norvegicus, Chem.. contrarius, Zam. . Meu oe SYTACUSENUS) WAN isccissbente|esnccs|s<- corneus, Zin. ........ polehelins; (PR. © gs» 150 41 14 33 369, Vermetus pellucidus. Probably the young of V. eburneus, Rve. > Patella Mexicana, Mazatlan. Long. 9 in. », Dentalium semipolitum. (Like D. nebulosum.) », Bulla calyculata, Pitcairn’s Island. 370. Crepidula ineurvata, Kamtschatka. » Fissurella hians, Valparaiso. » Hmarginula crenulata. young of 4. persona, which is sometimes deeply ribbed, sometimes nearly smooth. Both Philippi and Middendorff, however, regard it as a well-distinguished species, 176 REPORT—1856. A Page. Page. Pl. Fig. 370. Littorina squalida, Northern Ocean. Resembles L. littoreus. . 371. Margarita umbilicalis, Northern Ocean. : 5, Margarita striata, Northern Ocean .........+.. ......Z.B.V.143 34 11 » Sigaretus coriaceus, Northern Ocean : Cape Lisbon Bay. Neritina alata, Taheite. 372, Natica pallida, ley Cape........s.ceecceseecseeseees » 136 34 15 3 Natica otis, Mazatlan. Comp. N. Galapagosa......... » 136 ee ys » Natica clausa, North Sea, Sabine.........+.+045 mA Par » 136 {37 ,, Mitra crassidens. 373. Harpa gracilis. 374. Trichotropis bicarinata, 10-15 fms. Between Cape Lisbon Bay and Icy Cape. PI. 9. f. 4-8. : 375. Trichotropis borealis, Melville Is.: 1 sp. Lieut. Belcher, ley Cape. ss Buccinum boreale, Kamtschatka. 376. Columbella costellata. “Panama and Coast of Africa,” Gray. ,, 129 36 9 » Nassa luteostoma = N. Xanthostoma, Gray ............ i eeIOO oO », Ricinula elegans. (Very like R. arachnoidea.) >» Ranella nana, 377. Murex ducalis, near Mazatlan. = M. brassica, Lam. .... ,, 108 33 1 » Pyrula patula, Pacific (=T. melongena, var. n. 1611, Tank. 115 { 34 10 CORES ODS) Cemtesetiass anaes since eerily soa alapopeusraomtele 2 { 35 1,3 378. Fusus lapillus, Pacific. = Buccinum subrostratum, Gray, Wood Suppl. = Pyrula s., Gray, Z. B.V.... 0... eee » 115 3615 », Fusus pallidus, Mazatlan. “A Fusus from the Calcaire grossiére near Paris presents no observable marks of GMETENGEs: o. occpkce sc + civ. 6 efveje sae om) anata a ieks gaara cio. n » 117 3614 », Pleurotoma tuberculifera, North of Isabella Is., entrance of Gulf of California. 379. Conus arcuatus, near Mazatlan. ? =C. regularis, var..... oo LED 36,22 * 5, Conus interruptus, near Mazatlan. Resembles C. purpu- ATT PO AIT RT ah oO UD on amen e ak um 2 gape CUCONQT CUES, te toics «cio s/ole este: 109 Siniel slp lajalel aia adi sous iptniels Voge » 130 36 21 In a continuation of this paper (Zool. Journ. vol. v. pp. 46-51) are found the following species :— Pages 46. Chelyosoma MacLeayanum. Arctic Seas, on stones. New genus (Twnicata), described. 48. Cytherea planulata. Near Mazatlan............+eeee- Z.B.V.151 43 6 49, Venus decorata. Hab.? Mus. Sow. Brought home in the ‘ Blossom.’ Pl. Suppl. 40. f. 3. The duty of describing the Mollusca of the ‘ Blossom’ was undertaken by Mr. (now Dr.) J. E. Gray, who considered it a suitable occasion not only for introducing descriptions of Mollusca collected in the Pacific Ocean about the same time by Capt. Lord Byron, Mr. Fryer, and the Rev. — Hennah, and presented by them to the British Museum; but also for giving a com- plete account (so far as materials then served) of the animals of the various genera. This course delayed the completion of the work for nine years; and it was at last only by entrusting the revisal and completion of the MS. to Mr. Sowerby, that Capt. Beechey was enabled to publish the work in July, 1839. For the reasons above stated, the “ Zoology of Captain Beechey’s Voyage: Molluscous Animals and their Shells, by J. E. Gray, F.R.S. &c., London 1839,” is more valuable as a contribution to general conchological and malacological knowledge than to the furtherance of geographical studies. ~ | , ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 177 The following is a list of the additional species described, so far as they may be supposed to belong to the West N. American province ; the references to the species already described by Brod. and Sow. being appended to the former list. The diagnoses are in English; the plates beautiful and accu- rate, sometimes, however, too highly coloured. Page. Plate. Fig. 108 33 4,6. Murex vitulinus [? non Lam.]=Vitularia salebrosa, King, Zool. Journ. v. 347. 109... .... Murew acanthopterus, “ Lam. 165 = M. monodon, Esch. =M. phyllo- pterus, Sow. Gen. non Lam.=M. foliatus, Wood =M. purpura alata, Chemn. Pacific, N. Zealand, &c. [!] + M. trigonularis, Cab. Lam. (filed down).”’ 109 ... ... Murex monodon, Sow. Tank. Cat. no. 1703. 109... .4. Murex regius, Panama. 109... ... Murex radix, Panama. 109... ... Murex radix, “ wide-variced var. further north.’=M. nigritus, Phil. +M. ambiguus, Rve. 109 j 33° 1. Murex brassica, Lam. “ Further north still.” 110... ... Tritoniwm Chemnitzit. “ =Mureer argus, var. Chemn.” 112... ... Pollia hemastoma. =Pisania sanguinolenta, Ducl. =o Turlinella rigida, Gray in Wood Suppl. 114... +... Turbinella castanea, Pacific. 114... ... Turbinella cerata, Gray in Wood Suppl. +. «ee Fusus angulatus, North Sea. 117... ... Fusus Sabini, North Sea. 117... ... Fusus ventricosus. see eae Fusus glacialis, Arctic Ocean. 117... ... Fusus fornicatus, Gmel., Iey Cape. 118 36 13. Fusus lamellosus, Icy Cape. 118... ... Fusus multicostatus, Esch. . Northern Ocean. 119... ... Conus Ximenes, Panama. 122 34 5. Harpa rosea crenata. = H. crenata, Swains., Pacitic. 124... ... Monoceros grande, Pacific. 124... ... Monoceros punctatum, Pacific. 124... ... Monoceros lugubre, Sow. Gen. f. 3. = M. cymatum, (Soland.) Sow. Tank. Cat. = Buccinum denticulatum,+B. amatum, Wood Suppl. Pacific. (California, on rocks, teste Reeve.) 125... ... Monoceros maculatum=Buccinum brevidentatum, Gray in Wood Suppl. = Purpura cornigera, Blainv. Pacific. [Mr. Gray assigns no reason for changing his own previous name. | 127 36 6. Buccinum angulosum, Icy Cape. 128... ... Buccinum polaris, Icy Cape. 128 36 19. Buccinum tenue, Icy Cape. 129... ... Columbella cribraria, Lam.=C. mitriformis, Brod. and King. 131 36 25. Oliva zonalis, Lam. 131 36 23, 27. Oliva undatella, Lam. 131... ... Oliva lineolata, Gray. =Voluta Dama, Wood Suppl. 4; 37. ?Peru. 131... ... Oliva volutella, Lam. 132... ... Aragonia hiatula, (Gray, not] Lam.= Oliva testacea, Lam. S. Amer. 136 37 2. Natica horealis, North Sea, Sabine. 136 37 4. Natica suturalis, North Sea, Sabine and Beechey. 139 ... ... Litiorina fasciata, ? Pacific. 143* 34 14. Trochiscus Norrisii, Sow., Mag. Nat. Hist. 2nd series. 147 39 1. ?Lottia pallida, Pacific. = Acmea mitra, Esch.t * From this page to the end, the work is edited by Mr. G. B. Sowerby, principally from _ Mr. Gray’s MS. tT As Mr. Gray quoted the Zool. Atl. in the earlier part of this work, it is remarkable that he did not adopt Eschscholtz’s genus 4emea, instead of Lottia, which, with others in the Same work, appear only one step removed from the nonsense names of Adanson. 6. N — — (sy) —_ —_ “I — —_ NI 178 REPORT—1856. - » ¥O Page. Plate. Fig. = 148 39 12. Patella Mazatlandica, Mazatlan. This species did not occur among the myriads of limpets lately sent from the same place. It closely resembles Acmea cassis, Esch., and may really have come from the North. 150 41 15. Chiton tunicatus, Wood. Sitcha (teste Reeve). 150 41 16. Chiton articulatus, Sow. Proc. Zool. Soc.1832. San Blas, under stones. 150 41 17. Chiton setosus, Sow. P.Z.S. 1832. Guacomayo. 150 43 9. Chama echinata, Brod. Trans. Zool. Soc. vol. i. p, 306. pl. 39. f. 5-7. The specimen figured in these books, and in Chén. Conch. IIl., as a very old individual of Ch. echinata, is proved by the series in the B.M. Mazatlan Coll, to be a comparatively young shell of Chama frondosa, var. Mexicana. V. Cat, p. 87. no. 121. 151 41 8. Venus neglecta. Central America, in sandy mud. 151 43 5. Venus biradiata. Found abundantly at San Blas and Mazatlan. = C. squalida, Sow. = C. Chionea, Mke. 152 44 10, Astarte Banksii, Northern Seas. 152 44 9. Astarte ? striata, Northern Seas. 152 42 4. Cardita crassa, Acapulco. 152 42 7. Cardiwm Panamense, Sow. Proc. Zool. Soc. 1833, p.85. Sandy mud at Panama. The specimen here figured can hardly be distinguished from the young of C. procerum. 152 42 3. Pectunculus inequalis, Sow. Proe. Zool. Soc. 1832, p. 196. Sandy mud at Panama and Real Llejos, This is not the shell usually known by this name, and is accordingly quoted by Krauss for a S. African species. 154 44 4. Tellina proxima, Brown, MS. Arctie Ocean. 154 44 8. Mactra similis, Gray, MS. Northern Seas. The following species are added on the authority of Mr, Reeve, in his Conch. Icon. :— Plate. Spec. 9 62. Fissurella Lincolni, Gray, Conch. Ill, p. 7. no. 62. f.40. Monterey, Belcher, 6 27. Turritella sanguinea, Rve. California, Mus. Belcher. 11 42. Murex imperialis, Swains. Zool. Ill, series 2. vol. ii. pl. 67, Mud banks, Isabella Is., Cal., Belcher. 29. In the “Supplement to the Index Testaceologicus, by W. Wood, F.R.S. &¢., London, May 1828,” are figured several shells (principally with- out habitats) which belong to the West N. American fauna, and which were probably collected by Capt. Lord Byron, Rev. — Hennah, &c. Those which are recognized are as follow :— Plate. Fig. 1. Donazx scalpellum, B.M. 6. Venus subrugosa, Mawe, Panama. 11. Arca pectiniformis, B.M. Closely resembling Pectunculus inequalis. 6. Conus gradatus, Mawe. California. 7. Cyprea arabicula, (Mawe) Lam. South Seas. 3. Bulla decussata, Mawe. Panama. (Ficula.) 26. Voluta harpa, Mawe. 36. Voluta cerulea, Mawe. = Oliva volutella, Lam. . Voluta Dama, Mawe. S. Sea. = O, lineolata, Gray. 1. Buccinum ringens, B.M. = Malea crassilabris, Val. 5. Buccinum coarctatum, Mawe. (Cassis.) 6. Buccinum Rudolphi, Mawe. = Purpura columellaris, Lam. 10. Buccinum brevidentatum, Mawe. (Monoceros.) 12. Buecinum armatum, Mawe. ?2= Monoceros lugubre. 13. Buccinum tectum, Mawe. (Cuma.) 15. Buccinum Planazis, Mawe. =Planazis laticostata, Sow. 18, Buccinum strombiforme, B.M, = Columbella strombiformis, Lam. AA DP PP APP AIR CoO 09 G2 bo tO tS i) ie + 4 = ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 179 23. Buccinum roseum, B.M. = Harpa rosea. 24, Buccinum minus, B.M. = Harpa minor. 1. Strombus gracilior, B.M. 13. Strombus galea, B.M. 14. Strombus galea, jun. 21. Strombus granulatus, B.M. 3. Murex rigidus, B.M. (Lathirus.) 13, Murex regius, Swains. South Seas. 15. Murex ceratus, Mawe. (Lathirus.) 19. Murex aculeatus, Mawe. = M. dubius. 1. Trochus undosus, Mawe. California. (Pomaulaz.) . Trochus unguis, Mawe. California. (Uvaniila.) 3. Trochus olivaceus, Mawe. S. Sea. (Uvanilla.) 4. Trochus pellis-serpentis, Mawe. Panama. (Tegula.) 17. Trochus Byronianus, B.M. Sandwich Is. [?] (Omphalius.) 23. Trochus filosus, B.M. 44. Turbo fluctuosus, Mawe. (Callopoma.) 45. Turbo saxosus, Mawe. (Callopoma.) 2. Nerita patula, B.M. (Natica.) S. America. 4, Nerita ornata, B.M. 8. America. = N. scabricosta, Lam. 2. Patella poculum, B.M.= Trochita radians, Lam. 3. Patella Peziza, B.M. = Crucibulum spinosum, Sow. 4. Patella scutellata, B.M. = Crucibulum imbricatum, Sow. DODDDARMNANNONE Oo pA AA to 30. In the Voyage of the Astrolabe to the Australian and East Indian Seas during the years 1826-1829, of which the “ Zoology” was published by MM. Quoy and Gaimard, Paris, 1830-35, there does not appear to have been a single species collected identical with any from N. America. A list of the Mollusea is given by Menke in the Zevt. f. Mal. for March 1844, pp: 38-48. The same result appears in East Indian and Polynesian voyages generally, which therefore have not been collated. 31. In the “ Description of the Cirrhipeda, Conchifera, and Mollusca in a Collection formed by the Officers of H.M.S. Adventure and Beagle, em- ployed between the years 1826-1830 in surveying the southern coasts of- S. America, including the Straits of Magalhaens and the coast of Tierra del Fuego, by Capt. Philip P. King, R.N., F.R.S., assisted by W. J. Broderip, Esq., F.R.S.,” given in the Zool. Journ. vol. v. 1832, pp. 332-349, occur very unexpectedly descriptions of the following species :— No. 44, Ampullaria Cumingii. Is. Sabago, Bay of Panama, in a small hill stream. Received from Mr. Cumig. Mus. Brit., King, Brod. » 57. Murex salebrosus. Hab.? Mus. King, Sow. »» 60. Triton scaber. Fished up with the anchor in Valparaiso Bay. Mus. King. | _ 82. The most comprehensive and accurate materials for the knowledge of __ the tropical Pacific fauna, are to be found in the collections made by Hugh _ Cuming, Esq. In the year 1827 that gentleman set out on his first great _ conchological voyage, and remained till 1830, exploring the West coast of _ America, at various stations from Chili to the Gulf of Fonseca or Conchagua, in lat. about 13° N. He also visited various of the Pacific Islands, and _ especially the Galapagos group. Mr. Cuming is the first collector on record _ who took notes, as accurate as was thought necessary, of the results of his dredgings. It is cause for the greatest regret that a systematic account of this expedition has never been published. The new shells brought home have indeed been to a great extent. described in the Proc. Zool. Soc. and _ figured in the Monographs of Sowerby and Reeve. Of these the particulars _ Of station and habitat have been recorded. But not only has the student to n2 Ps 180 REPORT—1856. wade through a number of works, at the risk of overlooking what belongs to his purpose: he has also to find that many of the genera have never yet been examined; and that, while new species are tabulated, the localities of those before known are not given. If materials are yet accessible by which lists could be published of all the shells found by Mr. Cuming at different places, separately, with particulars as to their frequency, as well as station, such a work would be among the most valuable contributions to geographic zoology yet given to the world. All notes of habitat recorded in the Proc. Zool. Soc. 1832-1836, may be considered as very authentic*. After the interruption caused by the second and great expedition of Mr. Cuming to the Philippines, there is of course a possibility of error from the accidental interchange of tickets belonging to different species. It is right to state that the services rendered to malacological science by the researches of Mr.Cuming are only equalled by the urbanity and readiness with which he allows the use of them to scientific inquirerst, and to which the author is under very peculiar obligations. The following are the species observed in the Proc. Zool. Soc. Wherever the localities or stations given in the illustrated Monographs differ from these, the statements in the Proceedings must be regarded as of most authority. 1832. Depth Page. Proc. Zoou. Soc.—Cuming. Station. in fms. Locality. § te jun.ju. s. & rock-ledges| 1. w. |James Island, Gallapagos. Zo/Chitont Goodall, Brod. ee exposed sioatiog eee Ditto dittor 25|—— Stokesii, Brod. .......0008. on stones l. w. |Panama, St. Elena. 26|——_ limaciformis, Sow. .........| .. Spaiaemtcaacs esses | ee» |Guacom., Inner Lobos Is. 27\——— Elenensis, Sow. ....... sess} under stones l. w. |Pan., St. Elen. 27 setosus, Sow. ........+++.../exposed situations) ... |Guacomayo. 28 scabriculus, Sow. ........006. under stones +» |Guac., Puerto Portrero. 28|\_—- retusus, Sow......... afiext add tvmecchts oseh ta secees) chess, Ditto, ddittos 29|Placunanomia Cumingii,Brod. { Anmond, one }u Gulf of Dulce. 29\Dentalium tesseragonum, Sow...| sandy mud 10-16 |G. Nocoiyo, P.Port., Xipix. 30\Carocolla quadridentata, Brod... woods +. |G. Dulce. * It is necessary, however, to use even these with caution; as, in the papers purporting to describe shells collected by Mr. Cuming, species are introduced from places which he never visited. All shells quoted from the Gulf of California, Acapulco, and stations north of the Bay of Fonseca, are of this class. These were obtained, but not collected, by Mr. Cuming, and are therefore liable to the errors of his informants. A remarkable instance of the way in which mistakes arise will be found in P. Z. 8. 1833, p.36, where Mr. Sowerby, in describing “ shells collected by Mr. Cuming,” states that “ detached valves were picked up on the sands at Real Llejos and Mazatlan.” In Mr. Reeve’s Monograph, which is supposed to be of perfect accu- racy in all matters relating to the Cumingian Museum, we read that ‘a few odd valves of this species were found by Mr. Cuming on the sands at Real Llejos and Mazatlan.” { Mr. Broderip, in commencing the description of the shells collected by Mr. Cuming in his great expedition to the Philippines, 1836-40, deservedly writes (Proc. Zool. Soc. 1840, p. 84),—‘‘ Mr. C., by his accurate notes, and the open publication of the places where every one of the multitudinous species and varieties collected by him was found, has mainly assisted in making a complete revolution in this department of the science, and has done more towards giving us data for the geographical distribution of the testaceous Mollusca than any person who has yet lived.” t Perhaps the first notice of Mr. Cuming’s labours occurs in a “ Description of several new species of Chitones found on the coast of Chili in 1825, with a few remarks on the method of taking and preserving them, by John Frembley, R.N.” (Zool. Journ. vol. iii. 1828, pp. 193- 205). Among others, the author describes Chiton Cumingsii, “after his friend Mr. Cumings of Valparaiso, whose zeal in the pursuit of this interesting science will, he is persuaded, soon make a large addition to our present stock.” In connexion with this paper should be read another, by the Rev. Lansdown Guilding, B.A., in the Zool. Journ. vol. v. pp. 25-35, ‘ Ob- servations on the Chitonide: St, Vincent, May, 1829,” In this paper, the genus Acanthopleura is properly characterized. ee ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 181 1832. Page. Proc. Zoou. Soc.—Cuming. Station. in ins. Locality. 31/Bulinus translucens, Brod. on trees .. |[s. King & Saboga, B. Pan. 32|Fasciolaria granosa, Brod......... mud banks «. |Pan. 33/Voluta Cumingii, Brod.,.....1 SP.| seccsscecseessseeenes 9 |Gulf of Fonseca. 50/Cancellaria solida, Sow. ......... sand 8-10 |Real Llejos, St. Elena. 51 Dullata, Sow. ...scecscseesee mud 12 |Payta, G. Nocoiya. 51|—— mitriformis, Sow. ......1 sp. sandy mud .. |Pan. 51|/——- goniostoma, Sow.......1 sp. sand 8 |Conchagua, San Salvador. 52|/—— clavatula, Sow. ............. ..| sandy mud 7 |Pan., Pay. 52|———- obesa, Sow. .....-- SCOR ERA WabGeuU Sac eee «| 15 |G. Dulce, P. Port. 53|——- cassidiformis, Sow. ......... saridy ‘aud 16 |Pan. 53) —— acuminata, Sow. .........00 sandy mud 12 |Guacom. 54/—— buccinoides, Sow..........+ -| sandy mud 7-15 |RI.L}j., Iqui., Callao, P.Port. 54 Indentatas SOwW....c0scocososes| ssavencecacccs ccoeene tke ean. 54|/—— heemastoma, Sow.s......se00s sand 10-16 |Gal. 54 chrysostoma, Sow. ......... sand 8-10 |Pan., St. Elen. 55|—— gemmulata, Sow. .........+6 sandy mud +. |G. Nocoiya. 55|—— decussata, Sow.......ss.eesee sandy mud 10-13 |Pan., P. Port. 55 bulbulus, Sow. ...2 sp. jun. sand 8-10 |Real Llejos. 55/Scalaria diadema, Soin... Tee CEA ie épcdacnaunsochter® . |... {James Is., Gal. 55/Cardita Cuvieri, Brod. ...... 1 sp. sandy aan 11 |G. Fonseca, 56 varia, Brod. ....scecccsecseeee fine sand 6 |Gal. 58/Chiton dispar, Sow. ..........44 --| under stones | shore |Is. Saboga. 58|—— Columbiensis, Sow. ......... under stones l. w. |Pan. 59|—— hirundiformis, Sow. ......... under stones |1. w. Neranies ta. Tews DEEL 60|Stilifer Astericola, Brod. .........\in Asterias solaris! ... |Ld. Hood’s Is., Gal. 105|Bulinus vexillum, Brod. [= al- frag of large } Is. King and Saboga sa E ga. ternans, Beck, teste Jay] ...... trees 105 Panamensis, Brod. ......... ditto ... |Ditto ditto 113/Columbella pulcherrima,Sow.Isp,|_ sandy mud 10 |G. Dulce. 113 harpiformis, Sow. -.........| on dead shells 10 |Pan. 113|—— bicanalifera, Sow.......... | - Sandy mud 10 |Gal. 114|—— coronata, Sow...,............] under stones w= [Pan. 114|—— lyrata, Sow. ......... RE under stones ... |Pan., Chiriqui. 114|—— elegans, Sow............0e8...| sandy mud ... |Guacom. 115|—— turrita, Sow........++.0.......|coarse grav.&s.m.| 10 |B. Mont., St. El. 415|—— fulva, Sow. ........eeee6se+5.| under stones ... =|Pan. . 115|—— rugosa, Sow....... .-».| under stones ... |Pan., Xipix. 115|—— fluctuata, Sow. ......s0ce.seee under stones ... |G. Nocoiyo. 116|/—— lanceolata, Sow. ............| fine coral sand 6-8 |Gal. 116|—— maculosa, Sow......seeecesees sandy mud ... |Guacom. 116|—— heemastoma, Sow............| under stones ... |Gal., Pan. 116 varia, Sow. core ....| under stones ... |Pan. 116|—— scalarina, Sow................| under stones ... |Pan., Chiriqui. 116)?—— pyrostoma, Sow. ............] under stones ... |Pan., Gal. 117)? Maura, SOW. ...e.se000s..| Under stones ... |Pan., Gal. 117|?—— livida, Sow. ...........see.+..| under stones her [halle 117 fuscata, Sow. ....... under stones .. |Pan., St. Elen., M. Xti. 118|—— costellata, Sow....... ast sp. Pnareesaheneres: eerie 2G, "|baln, 118 guttata, Sow. ‘“ Long well known, but not aware that hi- therto described.” = Buccinum under stones ve (Pan. cribrarium, Lam. aaa 118|—— varians, Sow. “First brought ie , s by Capt. Cook, in Endeavour.”| f cts] ses Galapagos (Hood’s Is.). 118 angularis, SOW.......ssecceees| coscestenseescencs &o | ees, [Pane 118;—— castanea, WOW encticccceaserel netconceuces ..| se. |Keal Llej. | 119} —— major, Sow. ......scecsceeeees under stones ... |Ls. Muerte. 119 procera, SowWs.ssscese So BPs] veccecteenens ». |Pan. 119) —— pygmea, Sow. .ecreserevsees ‘Jon dead sh. , sdy m. 10 |St. El. 119 UNICOLOL, SOW. sr.seeceeveecee| cesecsssssssessseeese| ave [ Gal. (Hood’s Is.).” 125|Bulinus nux, Brod. .recscersssaes “on bushes ... |Charles Is., Gal. 182 REPORT—1856. a ; Proc. Zoou. Soc.—Cuming. Station. Dee 173|Cancellaria uniplicata, Sow. 2sp. sand 10 173|Ovulum avena, Sow....... euest ness Sukie gel Sets ys ves toil anne 173 inflexum, Sow. ......... MR ielters chesvaccascase-h scat "ee 174|— eequale, Sow,......... Bec pecs] vedcbuyeuese'ssodecpan at 174|Murex recurvirostris, Brod....... sandy mud 9 174 erosus, Brod. ....ce.ss.00+ --| under stones " 175 pumilus, Brod.............++5 under stones a 175 nucleus, Brod.....- Wer aiagene fine coral sand 8 175 vibex, Brad. ....0-.cessceeeess sandy mud 6-12 176 oxyacantha, Brod. .......+. sandy mud 8 176|—— nitidus, Brod. ,........ lsp.| cleft of rock Se 176 horridus, Brod. =M. Boi- vinii, Kien. ...... * ABER as SE sandy mud 8-12 177 lappa, Brod.......s++++.+08++ rocky bed 12 179/Ranella muriciformis, Brod....... loose gravel 7 M7 Ol —— erp a ctgtOd, cagewasanes ers: under stones AN 185|Cypreea Pacifica, Gray.........+...|| under stones . 185 rubescens, Gray. ,...+++ +»...| under stones Pr 185|—— Maugeri, Gray. ......+++.+- under stones 289 194/Ranella pyramidalis, Brod. Oh tveefs ke sand 6-12 muddy sand 6-12 sandy mud 6-12 sandy mud 10 196 assimilis, Sow. .,....- ate cece sandy mud & grav.) 8-12 196|Capsa altior, Sow.....,.-+++++.++ ++-| coarse gravel 12 196 MINED ebnats spovetibep chess thin mud 5 198|Nucula polita, Sow. ......... lsp. sand vA 198 costellata, SOW....++...0+0++- sandy mud 10 198|——_ gibbosa, Sow...... caus «so5 00s soft mud 5 198}——_ 5 Maeve bapae Bienes ee ens mud 12 199|Amphidesma rupium, Sow...... { coarse gray. in co- 4 oe 199|—— ——,, Var. ...secceeeeeseee +» ||ralreefs, &in rocks} f ... 200 punctatum, Sow...... (5) Uy | ee ae S5 200|Neritina latissima, Brod. ......... on rocks in river] ... 201 globosa, Brod. = N. inter- media, var. teste Rve.+-N. tri- in river tonensis, Guil. teste Sow. . : on stonesin moun- 201 intermedia, Sow ......+++ { ote creed ide 20.)\——— 9p VAT ae scnesgpcccccsccescss in rivulet a mud bank partially 201|——- picta, Sow...... Spriseraced 4 overflowed with fr.| +... water ; abundant 88%4|Spondylus dubius? =S. pri ondylus dubius? =S. prin- fem WANs MOGs. pcepscsceses on shells 10 5|Triton lignarius, Brod. ............ sandy mud 7-12 5|—- tigrinus, Brod.......+.+++. +-| Sandy mud 11 6 lineatus, Brod..o...cccscesees coral sand 6 7|—— gibbosus, Brod.,.......+++..- coarse sand 7 7|\—— scalariformis, Brod.......... coarse sand 10 7\Turbinella tuberculata, Brod. ...| under stones ne 7|—— armata, Brod. ..........00... on coral reef aK 52\Conus tiaratus, Brod. =C. mi- | | on sand in small nimus, Linn. var. teste Rve. { |ponds of sea water } a 54 TUK, ee Poaghhedacssscdsss-| engecst Pt es ae Bia 54 Archon, Brad. .00.2..0sse.00. sandy mud 12 54 purpurascens, Brod....... sandy mud in 55|—— gladiator, B70d,.......+06+ clefts of rocks. 55|—— Orion, Brod...........+. «sese.(SOft Sand in ditto] ... Locality. Pan. Conchagua. G. Dulce. Pan, G. Nicoiyo. Pan. Gal. Gal. St. Elen., Pan. Real Lleijos. Real Lleijos. St. Elen., Pan. St. Elen. B. Mont. Pan. Gal. Gal. Gal. Pan., Ulitea. RI. Llej., Pan., St.E].,Guac. Pan., Salango. B. Mont., G. Nocoiya. Pan., Real Llej. B. Guayaq., P. Port. G. Nocoiyo. Tumbez. Pan. Pan. Tumbez. G. Nocoiyo. Ld. Hood’s Is. Gal. Gal. Real Llej. Chiriqui (Nicoya, Sow.). Is. Lions, Bay Mont. San Lucas, Gulf Nocoiya. Pan. Gulf of Tehuantepec. Guacomayo. Galapagos. Panama and Monte Xti. Bay of Montijo. Galapagos. Elizabeth Is, Galapagos. Galapagos. Bay of Montija. Panama. Real Llejos. Porto Protrero & Panama. a ee ee ee ere a ee —— Sa ae >» q ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 183 ag Proc. Zoou. Soc.—Cuming. Station. ean Locality. : soft mud in rocks} ... |Panama, 55/Conus princeps ....... PERERA g sandy mud in ditto St. Elena and Monte Xti. 82/Cardium Cumingii, Brod.......... sandy mud 12 |Gulf of Dulce. 83 procerum, Sow,........++0.5. coarse sand 4-6 |Real Llejos. 83 planicostatum, Sow...... Ri fine sand 13. |Guacomayo. 85;—— Panamense, Sow.........+++5 sandy mud 10 |Panama, _ 124/Orbicula Cumingii, Brod....... { stl oe oh Lae } Payta, St. Elena, Pan. 18/Byssoarca illota, Sow. ..........4+ under stones Gulf of Nocoiyo. 19 truncata, Sow. ....s..s.e.20es on st. & Avicule Galapagos, Ld. Hood’s Is. 19/Arca tuberculosa, Sow. ..........+. rootsofmangroves| 1. w. |Real Llejos. , 20/—— concinna, Sow. .....s...+00... coarse sand 12 yee of Nocoiyo. ; tacamas, Real Llej., Xip., 20/—— emarginata, Sow. ...ccc...ccc] ccsceeesesesseeseeees Ke { Pisaea ahd Dol a Gahe 20|—— formosa, Sow. .......... atta) Uda Was dthersedabachs ... |Gulf of Tehuantepec. 21|—— multicostata, Sow............| «+ than artictns 3ets 5 12 | Ditto. 22 quadrilatera, Sow. [ =gran- GIS JUNG)? canciganpiihcishht-0s ds pen sandy mud 8 {Real Llejos. 21/—— labiata, Sow....,....,,00-0008 .| sandy mud 7 |Tumbez and Real Llejos. 34/Cumingia lamellosa, Sow....... {in hard clay { qe partite 35/Corbula nuciformis, Sow. ......... sandy mud 6{ eee Beha fossil 35 Dicarinata, Sow............+0 sandy mud 7-17 |Pan., RI.Llej., Carac., St.El. 35|—— biradiata, Sow............006 mud and sand . pee adh, 35 nasuta, Sow....... jesveseeeeee| Sandy mud 10 |Xipix. Jun. G. Nocoiyo. 35|—— ovulata, SowW.ssseecceseecccees sandy mud 7-17 |Xip.,B.Mont.,Carac.,R1.Lj. 36 tenuis, Sow. ........06 Pe sandy mud 12 |Bay Montijo. 36|Bulinus rugiferus, Sow............. under scorie ... |James Is., Gal. 37 unifasciatus, Sow.......s.00. under lava ... {Charles Is., Gal. 37 corneus, Sow. ....4.........,Und. decayed grass}... |Real Llejos. 71)Triton reticulatus, Sow............ under stones .. {Gal 72|Bulinus discrepans, Sow. ......... under bark Conchagua. 72 Calvus, SOW. ...s..cseeeeeee ...,on dry grass-tufts | ... |James Is., Gal. 72|/—— _ustulatus, Sow.........0...... on pieces oflava| ... /Charles Is., Gal. 73|—— unicolor, Sow, ......+. ‘oe on dead leaves ... |Is. Perico, Pan, 74 Jacobi, S0w........c0see0ee ...| under scoriz ..» |James Is., Gal. 134/Pleurotoma unimaculata, Sow....| sandy mud 8-16 |Monte Xti, Guac., Salango 134 Clavulus, SOW. s....sseeseree sandy mud 17 ‘|B. Montija. 135 oxytropis, Sow............| Sandy mud 13-20 |Pan., Port. Portrero. 135|—— albicostata, Sow. .......+0.5. fine coral sand 6 |Gal. 135|—— bicolor, Sow.............«....| | under stones ... {Pan, 135|—— sand 8 |Gal. 135|—— splendidula, Sow..,.......... fine coral sand 6 |Gal. 136|—— bicanalifera, Sow........6.... sandy mud 10 |B. Montija. 136 rugifera, Sow. .e......0+ «-...| fine coral sand 6 |Galap. 137 aterrima, Sow.* ....,....... under stones ... |Monte Christi. 137 Nigerrima, Sow. ......00. sandy mud 6-10 |Pan. 137 corrugata, Sow, .,...,... muddy sand 10 |B. Mont., Port, Portrero. 138 excentrica, Sow. ......+« coral sand 6 |Galap. 138]—— incrassata, Sow. ............ sandy mud 6-10 |Pan., Mte Xti. 138 duplicata, Sow........ tesseeee| Sandy mud 10 |Port. Portr., B, Mont. 138 unicolor, Sow. .......ceseeee sandy mud 6-10 |Pan. ‘ 139|—— granulosa, Sow...........s08 sand 8 |B. Mont., Pan. 139 variculosa, Sow. ............| sandy mud 10 |B. Mont. 139/—— nitida, Sow. ..scesecseseerees sandy mud 10 |B. Mont, 139|——- hexagona, Sow......... lsp.| sandy mud 13 |Guacomayo. 1834, 7|Eulima interrupta, Sow...... seeees] COarse sand 11-13 |G. Nocoiyo. a *'N.B: acuta, SOW. seccceceue coarse sand 13 |B.-Montiji. Oe eeneee Pl, rustica, Sow.=thiarella, Val. teste Jay. 184 REPORT—1856. 1834. Page. Proc. Zoou. Soc.—Cuming. ; Station. Locality. 18\Conus Luzonicus, var. ...........+ clefts of rocks l. w. |Gal. 18 brunneus, Wood .........++- clefts of rocks ..» |Gal., Puert. Portr., Pan. 19|—— diadema, Sow........... «ese-| Clefts of rocks | 1. w. |Gal. 19) regalitatis, Sow. ......00+... sandy mud in do.| ... [Real Llejos. 21 Gastrochzena ovata, Sow. ...... { Re A Z 7 S aa 21 truncata, Sow. .......seseeees on Spondyli «e- |Is. Perico. 21/—— brevis, Sow. .......scesssesee in pearl oysters | 3-7 |Galap., Lord Hood’s. 22 rugulosa, Sow. ....... erect in pearl oysters | 3-7 |Galap., Lord Hood’s. 22 hyalina, Sow. ............+ with the last 3-7 |Lord Hood’s Is. 35 Calyptraea rudis, Brod. ...... cscs) sescenceccesceteceees .. |Pan.; Real Llej. 35 corrugata, Brod. ......+04+ ..| under stones 14 |Guacom. 35|—— varia, Brod. ........seeeceseee| cee eecre sesseesee | eee |Gal.,Ld.Hd’sls.,Is.Muerte. OT Brad Bod ee cnnat fom sti sandy m,) 6-10 [Pan. 36 (——) lignaria, Brod.......| under stones ... {Real Llejos. 36|—— (—_) Vaile canepss se on’ on shells in s. m. 4 |Chiloe. 36, (——) tenuis, Brod. ....../onliy.shellsinm.s.| 9 |Samanco Bay. 37|—— ( ) serrata, Brod. .....jon dead shls., mud) 6-11 |Real Llejos, Is. Muerte. 37 Wein aeenien. f on stones, sand | 12 |Pan. 39|—— (Crepidula) unguiformis, { |inside dead shells, ; LGM. vervenveesscncrcssececeence . sandy mud } 4-20 Pane 40|—— aan excavata, [ae ee Vie ese ... |Real Llejos. 40|—_ (——_) arenata, Brod. ...... on sh. sandy mud| 6-8 |St. Elena. 40|——- (—_) marginalis, Brod..../stones & shls.s.m.} 6-10 |Pan., Is. Muerte. 40 ) squama, Brod ...... under stones .. |Pan. 47\Petricola robusta, Sow........ ROMER in rocks 6-11 |Pan., Is. Muerte. 47 amygdalina, Sow........ .....| In pearl oysters | 3-6 |Gal., Lord Hood’s Is. soft sandstone | }-tide |Is. Puna, Guayaq. 69|Pholas cruciger, S0w....0+.....006 1 soft stone l. w. |Bay Caraccas. hard clay "4 G. Nocoiyo. 69|—— calva, Gray, MS. adult} .......... pteeporiecd 5. | bls Raa J o"*") jun.} hard stones ans 7 70|/—— Pyar Nala) \sceceese ca hard stones 1. w. |Pan. 70|\——- acuminata, Sow. .........0.- limestone 1. w. |Pan. F1——$ _curta, SOW. ..cocsoreresrseecs soft stone 1. w. |[s. Lions, Veragua. 72 COTNEA, SOWs...... 000s eeeevens trunk of tree | 1. w. |Chiriqui, Veragua. ; 88\Lyonsia picta, Sow. ........000 { eee } 11 {Is. Muerte. 125|Fissurella obscura, Sow...........- under stones shore |Galap. 125 virescens, Sow. [non F. vi- rescens, Guild. =Barbadensis,| > exposed situat. | 1. w. |Pan. var. teste Sow.]....+.... cecenseas 125 Nigropunctata, SOW .......0.| sececessseeeesereners ..» |Galap., Lobos Is. 125|—— macrotrema, Sow........ ....| under stones | shore |Gal., Lambeyeque, Lob. Is. 125|\——- microtrema, Sow...... seeeeee] under stones ... {Real Llejos. 126 ineequalis, Sow.......++ Deasiets under stones | shore |Gal., Guacom. 126|—— pica, Sow. ....... Se sieseneasice = dead shells 6-8 |St. Elena, Galap. 127 Panamensis, Sow............ dead shells 6-10 |Panama. 128 crenifera, Sow..........+0e...| under stones | shore |Real Llejos. 148|Chama frondosa, Brod....... «s...-| On Coral rock 17 _‘{Is. Plata. 148|—— pelle sacs secs ssrdaocoagd on pearl oyst.s.m.} 10 (|G. Tehuantepec. 149|\——- imbricata, Brod. ............ on pearl oysters | 3-7 (Ld. Hood’s Is., Pearl Is. 150|\——_ » VAL. Aeeesssseoeseeeeeee-| FOCKS and stones | 1. w. |Galap. 150 producta, Brod........+....4. on stones, s.mud) 10 |G. Tehuan. 150 corrugata, Brod. ...0+...... stones 1. w. |Real Llej. 150|—— echinata, Brod.* ............ ou rocks 1. w. |Puert. Portr. \ 1835. 5|Hipponyx radiata, Gray (non } . Desh.) =H. Grayanus, Mike. on rocks ..» |Pan., Galap. * The old sp. spoken of are the young of Ch. frondosa, var, The young are Ch, coralloides,Rve. Se ee al ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 185 Pin Proc. Zoou. Soc.— Cuming. Station, ah ones Locality. 6|Mouretia stellata, Sow. [comp. 2 Gadinia pentegoniostoma] ... i meee 1. way |ealile}, 6|Siphonaria costata, Sow. ...... Sue otisatioas }. w. |Guacom. 7 MaUra, SOW. ...ssecesessseeees on rocks e. |Pan. 21/Venus Columbiensis, Sow......... coarse sand l. w. |St. Elena. 21 subimbricata, Sow. ......... fine sand 13 |P.Portr.,Acap.[Calif.,Sow. | 22|—— multicostata, Sow..........+. coarse sand 1. w. |G. Pan. 23|Cytherea unicolor, Sow............ coarse sand 6 |Real Llej. [Xipix., Sow.] 2 Concinna, SOW...........sc00s fine sand 10 |Pan. 41|Venus histrionica, Sow...........- muddy sand 1. w. |Real Llej., St. Elena. 41 fuscolineata, Sow........0... sandy mud 13 |Guacom. 42). discors, SOW.....s.sseesseeees sandy mud 6-9 |Guacom., St. Elena. 43 crenifera, Sow....... sceiggeab sand 1. w. |Payta, St. Elena. 44|___ prnatissima, Brod. ...1 sp.) sandy mud 10 |Pan. ae iat a ae wae. } sandy mud 3 |Chiriqui and Tumaco. 45|Cytherea tortuosa, Brod. ......... sandy mud 6 |Pan., Xipix. 45|—— affinis, Brod............cseeeee sandy mud 10 |Xipix. 46 Dione, var. .=C. lupinaria soft mud 5 |Tumbez. 46|—— vulnerata, Brod. ............ sandy mud 6 |Real Llej. 46 argentina, SOW........+0...00 sand-banks 1. w. |G. Nocoiyo. 84/Pinna rugosa, Sow. ...............| | Sand-banks w |Is. Rey, B. Pan, 84|——— maura, SOwW.....ssceesseseeees muddy banks Ste lean. 84) tuberculosa, Sow.............) muddy banks ... |Pan. 93|Pandora brevifrons, Sow.......... sand 10 /|Pan. 94/Buccinum modestum, Powis ...) muddy gravel | 7-17 |B. Mont. 95|Nassa nodifera, Pow..........0++0 coral sand 6-10 |Gal., Pan. 95|— festiva, Pow. ..secccccoseeee sandy mud 6-10 |Pan., St. Elen. 96|—— pallida, Pow......... aot Haeen sandy mud 6 |Pan. - 96|—— scabriuscula, Pow. ......... sandy mud 12 |Bay Mont. var.8.| sandy mud fe Is. Plata. 700 Feeten salandsa aos soe y-| and coral sand Hisdd { Git Tehuant. ‘ Isp. 6 |Galap. 109|——. magnificus, Sowd vary: coral sand 17 |Is. Plata. 109|—— tumidus, Sow. ......000.. sandy mud 6-10 |St. Elena, Salango. 194/Mitra tristis, Swains.............., Sandy mud 6-10 |St. Elena, Galap, oF —— effusa, Swains..........00000: sandy mud 12 |Guacom., Galap. 194/Tiara foraminata, Swains. = Vo- pears mud and } as luta lens, Wobne sae eds. gravel 6 ie St. Elena, Is. Plata, Pan. 4|——. muricata, Swains.............,| Sandy mud 6 |Galap. 1840. 139|/Murex plicatus, Sow. jun..........| coarse sand 12 |G. Nocoyo. 1841. . 51)Ranella nana, Sow. jun. .........] coarse sand 7 |Panama. [“Ins. Philip.”’] 52|—— albofasciata, Sow. jun....... coarse sand 10 |Panama, Ditto. 1842. 49|Siphonaria characteristica, Rve..| .... snasinsy bs vseepaes . |Pan. 197\Vermetus eburneus, Rve..........| «+ Rewage te scnttechiae ste A 1843, 23/Lima angulata, Sow. jun.........., Sandy mud 12-20 |Pan. 208|Natica Panamaénsis, Réel. ...... fine sand 10 |Pan. 210|/——- uberina, Val. in Humb...... muddy sand 5 |Casma, Peru. aly Note RTE Réel. [?— Nay coral sand ... {Albemarle Is., Gal. 185|Pleurotoma cedo-nulli, Rve...... sandy mud 10 |Pan. 30)Cyclostoma giganteum, Sow...... woods ... |Panama. 154\Terebra aspera, Hinds.............| | sandy mud 6-10 |Pan., Mte Xti., St. Elen. 156|—— elata, Hinds..................., Coarse sand 15 |Bay Mont. 160;,——- ornata, Gray (P.Z.S. 1834,| f[ coral sand 5-7 |Gal. | G2 )ircccdsesacssoneeenseaee tee (mud 7 |Panama, Hinds.) 166 p- Te, aciculata, Hds. (quasi Lam.) Xipix. (Acapulco, Sonso- nati, Hds.) 186 REPORT—1856. — Pics Proc. Zoou. Soc.—Cuming, Station. Prag 17|Lithodomus plumula, Hazl....... in Spondyli 59|Tellina Cumingii, Hani. ......... coral sand 60 rubescens, Han. ............ sandy mud oy 61|—— regia, Han. ...............0«.|coarse sandy mud} 7 ; soft sandy mud 5 61|—— laceridens, Hani.......... { sandy mud 3 €2|——- princeps, Hanl...... yoridias, soft sandy mud 5 70|—— insculpta, Hanl. ...... lsp.| sandy mud 3 71|—— felix, Hanl. .......:.eeeceeee sandy mud 6-10 142) —— gubernaculum, Hani. .. sandy mud 7 144|—— elongata, Haml........0+0+00. sand 3 144|—— Domhei, Hanl...........00.4- sandy mud 12 147|—— plebeia, Hamil. ............... sandy mud 7 147|—— aurora, Hanl. ..........+....| soft sandy mud 10 148|—— hiberna, Hanl.............++ sandy mud €-11 121)Triton pagodus, Rve. ......... swalliasdiseatenas stots teat a 121}—— pictus, Rve. .......s6s.eeee ee under stones 1. w. 12|Scalaria mitraeformis, Sow. Jun. | secseesseecrseceeeees =a 51/Columbella rugulosa, Sow. ....0| ...scesecereeceetere SI] —— atramentaria, SOW. sesses:| cecncccsevecsesecsors 52/—— nigricans, SowW.....es.se.se000] e+e sana S Aagae asta ss 1845. 1]|Artemis simplex, Hanl. [=Do- } sinia Dunkeri, Phil.].........+6+ Pea gee 11|—— subquadrata, Hal. ....,..0.| cescscserecseeseeees 15|Donax navicula, FAG, csyaccsteces| wscacegascecscanctese 15|—— gracilis, Hanl..s.+, 4 Var. 0.) ...cscsccseescsscneee VAL (Cibo tp i aeRanancsessiss ns 17 assimilis, Hanl. ....... bees: lkceuees PS Ae a 107/Ostrea Columbiensis, /Zanl..,.. rocks 4-tide 42/Glandina obtusa, P7/r. .......,....| leaves of bushes rae 129)Helix spirulata, P/r...........,..+-| trunks of trees qos 130|—— Nystiana, P/r. ...... daubiess| aabhiboneabe csitan ches Pe ee 139|Littorina aspera, PHA. ...5...pe¢0+| vesvicceteet a0 139| —— porcata, Phil. ....+....+ acer high exposed rocks race 142|}?—— aberrans, Phil....... ag ahowe's rocks 4-tide 53|Mitra gratiosa, Rveé. ....1..eseee coral sand 59|—— gausapata, Rve. mise so litesaepsadananaceessail| FLO 1846, 117|Chama Panamensis, Rvé.....,..++ on stones 119|—— Janus, Rve. .......0.006. .-.-.| on large Avicule 1848, 41|\Planorbis Panamensis, Df. .,.... in streams 97\Cyprea pulla, Gask. (described TBAO; Pr 22) cscs. wade o-c¢ pes free cs are CE Saale 49/Turbo saxosus, Jve....... Sams Peise.e| to vs\sciesobise wees ate bee 1849. 116/Anomia fidenas, Gray ....... eee on Pinne lw. 117|—— adamas, Gray .......... sees] On AV. marg. 9 134|Tornatellina Cumingiana, Pfr. | ......... canes pase 1850. 154/Phos turritus, 4. Ad.......000s000 coral sand 6-10 1851. 109|Nassa angulifera, 4.4d. ....4.001] seceeecssscaccssecees 10 110) —— nodicincta, 4. Ad...,........| cccecee Peapapsece ase 7 1855. 173|Scintilla Cumingii, Desh.......002| .....ccceseceees Bre beer 183)/Erycina dubia, Desh.......... diccelisssascssqenesas 248. Cytherea ?petichialis, Touranne. » 395. “ Purpura hemastoma,” punctured like the P. biserialis, and probably identical with it. (? =P. undata, figured as above.) 41. In the year 1836, the Venus sailed from France under the command of M. du Petit Thouars, on a voyage of discovery round the world. The second in command was M. Chiron, who, aided by his friend M. de La Perouse, collected a large number of shells. The ship visited Callao, Payta, the Gala- pagos, the Bay of Magdalena, Mazatlan, San Blas, and various stations north- wards as far as Kamtschatka. After the return of the expedition in 1839, M. Chiron furnished M. Des- hayes with a large number of specimens, who makes this characteristic an- nouncement. ‘ MM. les officiers de marine, qui ont le désir d’étre utiles a Vhistoire naturelle, reconnaitront qu’en mettant les riches matériaux qu’ils rapportent entre les mains de naturalistes vraiment travailleurs, ils en font pro- fiter de suite la science; ce gui n'a jamais lieu lorsqu’ils les donnent, sans discernement et en totalité, 4 des établissemens publics.” In this country we should desire to reverse the recommendation; and consider that collectors were showing their discernment by giving the first choice of their materials, en totalité, to public museums where they can be consulted by students. In the “ Revue Zoologique par la Société Cuvierienne, Paris, Decembre 1839,” pp. 356-361, appear Latin diagnoses of 30 ‘ Nouvelles Espéces de Mollusques, provenant des cétes de la Californie, du Mexique, du Kamt- schatka, et de la Nouvelle Zélande, décrites par M. Deshayes.” As several of the species figured by Conrad are redescribed, it is to be presumed that he wrote in ignorance of his labours. The following are the shells belonging to the West N. American faunas, with the habitats when recorded. P. 357. Chironia Laperousii. [ Monterey, pl. 21. Probably a deformed A. Hartweg.| Mag. Zool. 1840, tuberculosa. - 1, 12s P, 358. Cytherea equilatera, California. Pholas Janellii, California. =P. =Trigona argentina, Sow. M. Californica, Cour. M. Z. pl. Z. pl. 22. 14-16. Sazicava pholadis, Lam. An. s. Pholas concamerata, California. Vert. iv. 152. no. 3. Kamt- =P. penita, Cour. M.Z. pl. 17. schatka. P. 358.. Arca trapezia, “Semblas au Saxicava legumen, California. M. Mexique.” ?San Blas. M. Z. Z. pl. 29, Probably the long - ee Ne — — = ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 203 form of the common species: also found at Mazatlan. P. 358. Petricola Cordieri, California. = Venus lamellifera, Conr. M. Z. pl. 18. Petricola arcuata, California. M. Z. pl. 19. Petricola cylindracea, California. P. 360. Cardium Californiense, Califor- nia. M.Z.pl.47. =C. Nut- tallii, Conr.: not C. Califor- nianum, Conr. Siphonaria scutellum, “le Cha- tam.” ? Galapagos. Purpura Freycinetii, Kamtschat- ka. M. Z. pl. 26. Much more (Probably P. arcuata, var.) M. Z. pl. 20. P, 359. Venerupis gigantea, California. =Sazidomus Nuttalli, Conr. Venerupis Petiti, California. = Tapes diversa, Sow. jun. Anomia macrochisma, Kamt- schatka. M. Z. pl. 34. =Pla- like P. Japillus than Midden- dorff’s figures. Murex macropterus. Helix Dupetithouarsi, Monterey. M. Z. pl. 30, as “...... rst.” P. 361. Velutina Mulleri, Kamtschatka. Turbo digitatus, Acapulco. = Uvanilla unguis, Wood. M. cunanomia m., Gray. Z. pl. 36. Cypricardia Duperreyi, Califor- Natica Recluziana, California. nia. M. Z. pl. 27. M. Z. pl. 37. Modiola cultellus, Kamtschatka. Natica ianthostoma, Kam- P. 360. Cardium Laperousii, California*. tschatka. M.Z. pl. 48. Natica sanguinolenta, To the above must probably be added Purpura emarginata, p. 360, M. Z. pl. 25, described by Deshayes as from New Zealand, but quoted in Jay’s Cat. no. 8972, =P. Conradi, Nutt. MS., from California; and from the same locality in Mus. Cuming, on the authority of Mr. Hartweg. Many of these shells were figured in the following year in Guérin’s Magasin de Zoologie, between plates 14 and 48, of which references are given above. In the same works are described, Lucina cristata, Recl. Rev. Cuv. 1842, p. 270, Guér. Mag. pl. 60, found “sur le banc de Campéche” by M. J. Cosmao, Commander of the Naval Station of Mexico, = TVellina Burneti, Brod. & Sow.: and Lucina corrugata, Desh., Guér. Mag. pl. 82, as from California, which Mr. Cuming found himself at Singapore. The official description of the shells of the Venus, however, was intrusted to M. Valenciennes, under whose auspices was published “ Voyage autour du Monde sur la Vénus, pendant les années 1836-39, par M. du Petit Thouars. Paris, 1846.” Of this work plates only have been seen, of which the following are species connected with the West N. American coast. Bas. ph ae \ Plate. Fig. : We, Helix vincta, Val.. (California, Rye.) ‘ 24 4, 44a Pholas rostrata, Val. Almost certainly the young of one of the following species. 24 1,14a,6. Penitella Conradi, Val. ‘(Pholadidea, with long, inflated cup, without divisions.) 24 Penitella xilophaga, Val. (Pholadidea, with long, narrow cup.) 2. 24 3, 3.a,6,c. Penitella tubigera, Val. Probably a variety of the last; the tube being simply the lining of the old cavity, as in P. calva. 9 IE NE TPM A OLE LIE I 24 7a,b. Bornia {nscale Val. (Closely approaches Chironia Laperousii, Desh. 94 8, 8a. Sazicava clava, Val, (Probably S. legumen, Desh.) ' 16° 2; 2a, Venus perdiz, Val. 2? = Chione neglecta, Sow., represented with- ef out pallial smus. °16 3, 3a. Venus pectunculoides, Val. = Tapes histrionica, Sow. : 2.2; 2a. Trochus amictus, Val. = Uvanilia unguis, Mawe. = Turbo digi- tatus, Desh. ~ *® Described from a single shell which appears worn. It has much the aspect of a Tellina, with concentric ridges and no internal crenations; but is figured without pallial sinus, 3 204 REPORT—1856. Plate, Fig. 2 3,3a-c. Trochus brevispinosus, Val. = Uvanilla olivacea, Mawe. 3 1,la-e. Trochus balenarum, Val. ?2=Pomaulax undosus, Mawe, var. Vide B. M. Maz. Cat. p. 230, note. 14 1 Calyptrea rugosa (? cujus). = Crucibulum imbricatum, Sow. 14 2. Calyptrea tubifera, Less. = Cr. spinosum, Sow. 15 2. Calyptrea gemmacea, Val. Shell as figured, not recognized: it may be a worn and stunted Cr. imbricatum. 15 3. Calyptrea amygdalus, Val. = Crepidula onyx, Sow. 24 9,9a,b. Calyptrea perforans, Val. = Crepidula explanata, Gould. (The * prior name of Val. must be abandoned, as representing an un- truth. The form of the shell is due to its inhabiting the burrows of Lithophagi, &c.) 11 1,la,la,bis. Vermetus centiquadrus, Val. (Subg. Aletes.) ll 3,32. Vermetus Peronii, on Strombus galea. A variety of V.centiquadrus. 11 2. Vermetus margaritarum, Val. 5 1a,b. Fusus Petit-thouarsii. = F. Dupetit-Thouarsii, Kien. 6 1l,la-c. Buccinum Janelii, Val. = Pisania sanguinolenta, Ducl, 6 2,2a-c. Buccinum mutabile, Val. = Pisania insignis, Rye. 6 2e,f. Buceinum mutabile, jun. = Pisania gemmata, Rve. 6 24,8. Buccinum mutabile, operculum. (Extremely incorrectly drawn.) 8 4,4a. Purpura saxicola, Val. Resembles P. lapillus and Freycinetii. 8 3,34. Purpura hematura, Val. ? =P. biserialis, Blainv. var. 9 3,3a-c. Purpura Grayii, Kien. = Monoceros grande, Gray. It will be observed that the author has, in several instances, not only over- looked the writings of English naturalists, but even disregarded the descriptions by Deshayes of the shells of this very expedition. 42. During the period that Mr. Cuming was absent on his Philippine expedition, explorations of great value were being made by a gentleman, whose few published writings only show how much science has lost by his early death. In the year 1836, the ‘Sulphur,’ under Lieut. Com. Kellett, visited Callao and Payta in Peru, and explored the coast from the Bay of Guayaquil to Panama. Here Commander (now Capt. Sir E.) Belcher took the first place, a gentleman whose conchological labours during the voyage of the ‘ Blossom’ have already been recorded. Mr. Hinds, the surgeon of the expedition, not only showed the greatest industry in dredging and other- wise collecting specimens, but made the products of his labours tenfold more valuable by the accurate notes which he took of their localities and stations, guided by a comprehensive view of the subjects which it was his endeavour to illustrate. The west coast of Central America and Mexico was searched as far as San Blas, and afterwards explorations were made from Acapulco to Cerro Azul. On the return of Messrs. Hinds and Cuming from their respect- ive expeditions, they compared their collections and notes together. Here were abundant materials for geographical and stational lists of the very greatest value; but, most unfortunately, the usual plan was followed of only publishing the new species. This was done by Mr. Hinds in several most accurate and valuable papers communicated to the Zool. Soc. and to the Annals of Nat. Hist.; and, in a collective form, in the “ Zoology of the Voyage of H.M.S. Sulphur, commanded by Capt. Sir E. Belcher, during the years 1836-1842; by Richard Brinsley Hinds, Esq., Surgeon R.N. London, Smith, Elder and Co., 1844. Vol. ii. Mollusca.” The preface to this work contains a masterly digest of the results of his experience on the distribution of Mollusea, especially on those of the W. American coast as compared with the Pacific Islands; the influence of station, depth, temperature, and other causes, both on genera and on particular species; and the comparative effect ; ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 205. of similar differences on the flora and distribution of land shells in the same latitudes. The work therefore is extremely disappointing from its very ex- cellence, as it shows how prepared the author was to fill up the gaps which are to us the most perplexing ; but which his early death has left to be sup- plied by other, we fear less trustworthy hands. Several valuable donations of shells, with the localities added by Mr. Hinds, are preserved in the British Museum. The new species described are as follow, so far as relates to the fauna of West N. America. The pages and numbers, with the plates and figures, refer to the Zool. Sulph.; but the references are also added to the Proc. Zool. Soc. and the Ann. Nat. Hist. o ‘ = = Name, Station. verte Locality. 7 1] 1,2/Conus Patricius, Hds, A.N.H. xi. 256] sandy mud 7 |G. Nicoya. \7 .. |—— celebs, Has. no” \ =C. terebellum, jun., teste Rve. 7 1} 3-5] —— Californicus, Hds. ........s.sseeeseeees sand 7 |B. Magdalena, 8 2| 1-3/Murex Belcheri, Hds. P.Z.S. 1843, 127 { mud-bank at \ Sait Der) ; = Pyrula B., Rve. head of harbr.| f *** 59- (8 3| 7, 8|—— centrifuga, Hds. a » 126 sand 52 |W. C. Veragua. 8 3] 9, 10|— Californicus, Hds. ,, \, SMB SNe ek eeceeee Laws 4 \Californias 8 3}11, 12;—— hamatus, Hds. 9 ines mud 21 |B. Guayaquil. = Cerastoma, Conr. 9 3}13, 14 festivus, Hds. _ », 127 sand 7 |B. Magdalena. 9 3|15, 16\— foveolatus, Hds. _,, sp D2 sand 7 |B. Magdalena. 9 3|21, 22|—- radicatus, Hds. _,, » 128 mud 11 |San Blas. 9 3/23, 24|— peritus, Hds. % » 129 sand 7 |B. Magdalena. 3] 3,4)/Typhis quadratus, Hds. ,, 18 mud 7-18 |G. Nicoya, B. Guayaq. 4) 1, 2/Triton vestitus, Hds. 3 1844, 21 rocks shore |RI.Lj., G. Nic., B. Honda 4|13, 14 — anomalus, Hds. " »»| sandy shore | 1. w. |Is. Quibo, Veragua. 4)15, 16|— lignarius, Brod. 5 1833, '5 sandy mud 7 |Monte Christi. 2| 4,5/Ranella Californica, Hds. A.N.H. Xi.]......ccceseeeee Titel eae .. |San Diego. 255 4 = PECINALA, HAH: ..-sansassasatvecice eves mud 7 |San Blas. 1 Trophon muricatus, Hds. [The name mud 19 |Panama. being preoccupied by Montagu, this species may be called Troph. Hindsii. | 1,2 Pleurotoma nobilis, Hds. P.Z.S. 1843, 37 mud 7 |San Blas. 4|—_ pemmata, Hds. Fe iinet mud 7 \Gulf Magdalena. 7|—— inermis, /ds. 3 oH mud 7 |Gulf Magdalena. 10|Clavatula militaris, Hds. _,, » 38 mud 8-30 |Veragua. 15|—— ericea, Hds. 5 » 39 mud 26 |Magnetic Is., Veragua. 7 sculpta, Hds. 5) » »| ° ~ mud 7 |Panama. 18|——. rava, Hds. ;: Tat, mud 18 |G. Nicoya. 4|—— luctuosa, Hds. is MALO Ascisevte ssseseeeeee| 5-22 |G. Magdal., B. Guayaq. 7, 8| —— aspera, Has. a Peer mud 5 |B. Guayaquil. 5|—— quisqualis, Hds. * » 44 mud 8-14 |G. Papagayo. 9|—— plumbea, Hds. as yy All seb sueudwaees seeeseee| 5 |B. Magdalena. 10/——- occata, Hds. b Sik, apileinaeaayecves 075 woune] abelee Magnetic Is., Veragua. He eb eas He { mud 30 |W. C. Veragua. : f 1 a mud 8-14 |G. Papagayo. 1], 12; pudica, Hds. ” Ver mud 8-14 |G. Papagayo, 14/—— neglecta, Hds. a3 », 45} . under stones | 1. w. |G. Nicoya. 18|—— candida, Hds. 5 Wh WIAD te ddatdocect «..ceeaneal ease! Magnetic Is., Veragua. 20|—— merita, Hds. ff » 9| Under stones | 1. w. |G. Nicoya. 23, 24/—— impressa, Hds. Ff) » 44 mud 8-14 |G. Papagayo. 1j—— pardalis, Hus. * », 42) under stones | 1. w. |G. Nicoya. . 6|—— celata, Hds. mud 20 |G. Fonseca. 11/—— micans, Hds. mud 14 |G. Papagayo. S| ===" Tig idly, LASeM MeN Ay Miata ADI, sovay vodeks«sdaeses| Soseke Panama. 20|Daphnella casta, Hds. mud 23 |G. Nicoya. 5, 6|Cerithium gemmatum, Hds. .......... sandy mud |2-7-++-|Panama. ~ . |Terebra robusta, Hds. P.Z.S. 1843, p.149 3 varicosa, fds. +». |—— lingualis, Hds. —— armillata, Hds. ” ” ” . |—— tuberculosa, Hds. 155 —— specillata, Hds. = The Pacific analogue of 7, textilis, from Str. Macassar, No. 142, if —— luctuosa, Has. P.Z.S. 1843, p. 157 ” ” 1, 2}Phos crassus, Hds. 37|158}10}13, 14) —— Veraguensis, Hds. __,, ‘i Pacific analogue of Ph. senticosus. 7, 8|—— articulatus, Hds ” 39/166/11 u, 12|Trichotropis cancellata, Hds, P.Z. S. 1843, p. 17. 40/167) 11 re 14|—— inermis, Hds. _ P,Z.S. 1843, p.18 1, 2)Mitra Belcheri, Hds. A.N,H. xi. 255 41/170)12/11, 12 Cancellaria ventricosa, Hds. P.Z.S. 1843, DeiAM Pieoep vases. adeavgh sss The following shells occur in Reeve’s Conchologia Iconica, as having been — collected by Mr. Hinds. Plate.| Sp. Name. Station. en Locality, 1 | 3 |Natica Recluziana ............se008 ehouaaap “Wercaesage eval oearan California. 24 | 61 |Fig.a,d. Patella diaphana, Rve.=Ac-| .......s000 | cece Central America. mea mesoleuca, Mike. 5 | 24 iCardita Ctivyiert,Br0ds ieb.scsccsscscucss| sescaveccees’ | edeces Acapulco. 8 | 44 |Pectunculus pectenoides, Desh., Cuv.| soft mud 7 |Panama. R. A. pl. 87. f. 8. 1 | 4 JArca grandis, Brod. § Sow. ....ccccceos| scsecevescee | cvreee Real Llej., B. Guayqu. (Cuming & Hinds). 21 |165 |Mitra Hindsii, Rve. ...cseseccsessceevees mud 17 |G. Nicoya. 4 DaIBISSUTELAVOICAHO CUE. ssccesccscsecccave| scovscoccees | octeet Sta. Barbara. 7 | 33 |Chiton lineatus, WV00d ......s0e.csseeees ceeta cesses gieeeee Sitka. 227 Onl ———" INSIENIS VAUEn mt ne stents cs Lymnea umbrosa, Say (Astoria), Oregon, and Sacramento River. : Melania plicifera, G., Oregon. » Lottia viridula. “Myr. Nuttall brought home several specimens, which he described under the name of monticula”’ [monticola]. . Anodonta angulata, G., Sacramento River. 206, Scalaria ? australis, Puget Sound. This species is from the opposite In the Preface to this work, Dr. Gould'states his views as to the The plates have not yet found side of the equator from S. au- stralis. Dr. Gould thinks it will prove distinct, but cannot yet see any differences. : . Natica algida, G., Oregon. . Trichotropis cancellata,Hinds, Ore- gon. . Triton Oregonense, Jay, Oregon.= Fusus Oregonensis + cancellatus, Rve. . Purpura ostrina, G., Oregon. . Columbella gausapata,G.*, Oregon. . Chiton interstinctus, G., Oregon. . Chiton vespertinus, G., Oregon. . Saxidomus Nuttalli, Conr., Oregon. . Terebratula pulvinata, G., Oregon. . Terebratula caurina, G., Oregon. And the following Nudibranchs :— Chiorera leonina, G.; 310. ? Den dronotus ; 311. 2? Goniodoris; 29. ? Doris; ? Molis. eogra- phical distribution of species, and gives the following interesting lists of parallel species from different seas :— OREGON District. Mya precisa. Osteodesma bracteatum. Cardita ventricosa. Cardium blandum. Venus calcarea. ATLANTIC COAST. M. truneata. O. hyalinum. C. borealis. C. Icelandicum. V. mercenaria. * Dr. Gould remarks (p. 270), that “there is a minute operculum to Mitra, while there is none to Columbella.”’ Of the shells called Columbelle, the typical species, C. strombiformis, major, and fuscata, have a broad oval operculum, with the apex at the anterior end of the outside margin; Nitidella cribraria has a distinctly Purpuroid operculum; and Anachis costellata, &c, have a Pisanoid ungulate operculum. Vide BM. Maz. Cat. in loco, rae iM ‘ ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 211 OreEGon DisrTRIcT, ATLANTIC COAST. Alasmodonta falcata. A. arcuata. Helix Vancowverensis. H. concava. Helix loricata. H. inflecta. Heliz germana. H. fraterna. Planorbis vermicularis. Planorbis opercularis. Pl. deflectus. Pl. exacutus. Lacuna carinata. L. vincta. Natica Lewisii. N. heros. : Trichotropis cancetlata. Tr. borealis. Fusus fidicula. Lottia pintadina. F. turricula. L. testudinalis, &e. To which we may add (from California),— Solecurtus lucidus. S. radiatus. The following are quoted as parallel types between the Gulf of California _ and the Caribbzean Sea: CARIBBZAN SEA. LL. canaliculata. M. Brasiliana, LL. carinata. C. Chione. N. maroccana. GuLF oF CALIFORNIA, Lutraria undulata. Mactra nasuta. Lutraria ventricosa [Mactra exoleta]. Cytherea biradiata. } . Natica Chemnitzii, Pfr. Mediterranean. The following species have also been examined and determined by Dr. Gould, from the same collection :— Helix tudiculata, Binney, Oregon. Acmea cribraria, G., Columbia River, San Francisco, De Fuca. Modiola elongata, G., Puget Sound. Solen maximus, Mouth of Columbia R. Tellina nasuta, Conr., Mouth of Colum- bia River. Tellina secta, Conr., De Fuca. Tellina Californica, Conr., De Fuca. Melania plicata, Lea, Oregon. Melania Wahlamatensis, Lea, Sacra- mento River. (Cryptomya) Sphenia Californica, Conr., Sacramento River. . Melania occata, Hds., Sacramento River. Triton tigrinum, Brod., Puget Sound. Modiola discrepans, Mont., Puget 8. [!!] Modiola ? vulgaris, Puget Sound. Tellina Bodegensis, Hinds, Classet. Anodonta Nutialliana, Lea, Wallawalla, San Francisco. Buccinum corrugatum, Rve., Puget Sound. Purpura septentrionalis, Rve., Puget Sd. Pecten Fabricii, Phil., Puget Sound. Fusus cancellinus, Phil., De Fuea. Pholas (concamerata, Desh. =) penita, Conr., San Francisco. Paludina seminalis, Hds., Sacramento. _ _ In the MS. list of the shells collected in the Oregon and Californian _ district during the U.S. Exploring Expedition, sent by Dr. Gould, and in- cluding the above, there appear 70 species from Oregon, a district before so little known, that only 23 of them have been identified with previous names, the rest having been described by Dr. Gould. Through the great kindness of Dr. Gould, who showed his desire to make the materials for this Report as complete as possible, by copying out all the valuable information which was in his possession, we are enabled to present _the materials from which the foregoing lists were drawn up, in the shape in which they first made their appearance. They are the only documents approaching the authority of “dredging papers,” which have been made ‘public, in the whole history. of the coast, from Behring’s Straits to Panama. They are the memoranda made by Dr. Charles Pickering of the U.S. Expl. Exp.; the specific names having been for the most part added by Dr. Gould on identification. PQ 212 Box I. Orecon Tour. Anodon cognata, G., Lake near Nis- qually. Alasmodon falcata, G., Columbia, Spo- kan, common. Anodon feminalis, G., Wallawalla. Heliz strigosa, G., Interior of Oregon. Lymnea (long spire). Succinea (spreading mantle). Box IV. Pucretr Sounp. Venus (perhaps a fourth species), Classet. Tellina (middle size, smooth, not po- lished, smaller, and a little deflected), common, sandy places. Tellina secta, Conr. (or allied: larger, truncate at one end; ligament narrow, but elongate), common, sandy places. Mytilus (size of edulis, with a few large cost); [probably M. Californianus, Conr. ;] among rocks, low-water mark, Classet. Fissurella cratitia, G., Classet. Cardium blandum, G., dredged at Dunge- ness. Acmea ? mitra, Esch., Classet. Acmea instabilis, G., Classet. Acmea (costate and tuberculate), com- mon, Acmea (larger, apex more medial), Classet. Acmea (finely striate), rocks, Classet. Pecten hericeus, G., Classet. Pecten (young, costz smooth), Classet. Scalaria 2? borealis, Classet. Scalaria (large, much elongated, solid), Classet. Tellina (elongate, Classet. Oliva, Classet, dead. Haliotis (fragment of large species), Classet. Modiola (one valve, young). Triton tigrinum. Crepiduia_ (Capuloid); [probably C. adunca. | Crepidula nummaria, G., Classet. 2 Anomia, Classet, dead. Mytilus (common, like edulis). ? Saxicava (very short and ventricose), Classet. Natica algida, G., Classet. ' Nassa mendica, G., Classet. Purpura lagena, G., Classet. Cerithium filosum, G., Classet. Calyptrea ? pileiformis. Mya (very small), Dungeness. Cardium, Dungeness (dredged). concentric — striz), REPORT—1856. Box V. Pucet Sounp. Cardium (largest, used for food). Pecten hericeus, G., Dungeness. Purpura septentrionalis, Dungeness. Box VI. Pucret Sounp. Solen sicarius, G., Dungeness (dredged). Solen maximus, Classet. Helix Vancouverensis, Lea. Helix labiosa, G. Box VIII. San FRANCISCO. Cardium ? Californianum (same as Ore- gon). Mytilus (very large, a few shallow ribs, like Classet). Mytilus trossulus, G. (see M. edulis, De Fuca). Tellina secta, Cony. Mactra (a thin Mya-shaped species: per- haps Lutraria). Mya (Sphenia, $ in. ; see Straits of De Fuca). Tellina (small, like balthica). Fissurella ? cratitia (like Classet). Acmea (nearly smooth). Helix Nickliniana, Lea. Purpura emarginata, Ducl. Trochus mestus. Littorina planazis, Nutt. (= L. patula). Acmea (angulated), Yerba Buena. Box IX. San Francisco. Pholas (small, enlarged, rounded end). Pholas (smaller, obliquely truncate). Ostrea (small), Carquiiez. Amanicola, Sacramento. Helix Californiensis, Lea. Planorbis (form of campanulatus), Sa- cramento. Box X. San FRANCISCO. Anodon (winged), Sacramento. J Alasmodon falcata, G., Upper Sacra- mento. Purpura emarginata, Ducl. Anodon cognata, G., near the Presidio. Jar 184. SAcRAMENTO TRIP. Tellina (small, roundish), Carquifiez. Mytilus glomeratus, G. Helix Nickliniana, Lea. Cerithium (Potamis) Californianum. Anodon angulatum, Lea. Planorbis (like campanulatus), up Sacra- — mento. Planorbis (like trivolvis), up Sacramento. Acmea (smoothish), mouth of harbour, Acmea (smaller, more pointed). ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. Jar 185. San FRANcIsco. Physa virginea, G. Purpura emarginata. Littorina patula, G. Acmea scabra, G. (ridged and nodulate) [= A. spectrum, Nutt. ] Trochus (like Puget Sound). Physa (with truncate spire). Physa (elongate), from behind Presidio. Nassa (small, like Puget Sound). Planorbis (flat and rather fine). Succinea (small). Littorina plena, G. OrEGOoN, By DRAYTON. Tellina secta, Conr., below mouth of Columbia. Anodon feminalis, G., Wallawalla. Anodon Oregonensis, Lea, Wallawalla. Alasmodon falcata, G., Wallawalla. Melania plicifera, Lea, mill-dam above Vancouver. Tellina, F. George, stomach of sturgeon. Limnea (small), Lake at Vancouver. Solen sicarius, G. Melania, Chester River. Unio famelicus, G., Wallawalla. Helix labiosa. Pecten, dredged at Baker’s Bay. Limaz Columbianus, G., Nisqually. Natica Lewisii, G., Puget Sound. Modiola flabellata, G., Port Discovery. Pecten Townsendi, Nisqually. Panopea generosa, Nisqually. Orecon Tour. Helix strigosa, G. Planorbis vermiculatus, G., Wallawalla. Helix Townsendiana, Lea. Heliz devia, G. Jar 166. Dr Fuca To NisquaLLy. _ Lymnea (elongated). Physa (decollate). Pucet Sounp. Fusus fidicula, G. Pecten (young). Calyptrea (bis). Fusus (or Columbella, small, smooth). Venus (very small and smooth). > Chiton (very small). Modiola (like discors). Trochus virgineus, Wood. Cardita ventricosa, G. Fusus Orpheus, G. Cardium Californianum, Conr. Trichotropis cancellata, Hds. Goniodoris. Bulleoid [species]. 213 Crepidula (small, white, on young Pur- pura). Doris (like). Terebratula pulvilla, G. Terebratula (septentrionalis-like), Natica caurina, G. Oliva (small). BRouGHT UP ON ANCHOR. Chiton (very small and narrow). Rimula cucullata, G. Lacuna carinata, G. Acmea mitra. Litiorina scutellata, G. Acmeaa textilina, G. Solen maximus, (mouth of Columbia). Helix Vancouverensis, Lea. Limnea (much like Paludina), Columbia River. Physa (bis). JAR, GOING up TO PuGET SounpD. Limaz Columbianus, G. Limaz foliolatus, G. DreEepcep AT Port TOWNSEND. Chiorera leonina, G. Trochus (bis). Acmea (smooth, with Balanus). Jar 1881. OrEGON. Planorbis corpulentus, Say, Fort George. Limnea (ventricosa), near Fort George. Helix Vancouverensis, Lea. Helix Townsendiana, Lea. Unio famelicus, Wallawalla. Cyclas egregia, Vancouver. Bulla (small, very thin), ‘Puget Sound. Littorina lepida, Classet. Buccinum. Discovery HArgour. Helix, 5 or 6 species. Cardium blandum, G. Lutraria capaz, G. Venus ampliata, G. Mytilus trossulus. Chiton (shell not appearing externally). TownsEND HARBourR. Solen sicarius, G. Mytilus trossulus, G. Modiola flabellata, G. Cardium Nuttallii, Conr. Natica Lewisii, G. Bulleoid [species]. Trochus. Columbella. Purpura. Calyptrea. 214 REPORT—1856. 44, All existing information with regard to the Mollusca of the Boreal districts of North America and the corresponding portion of North-Eastern Asia, will be found embodied in the two following works :—* Beitrage zu einer Malacozoologia Rossica, von Dr. A. Th. von Middendorff. St. Peters- burg, 1847:” and “Reise in den Aussersten Norden und Osten Sibiriens, wihrend der Jahre 1843 und 1844, von Dr. A. Th. v, Middendorff. Band II. Zoologie. Theil I. Wirbellose Thiere, St. Petersburg, 1851. Mollusken, pp- 163-464." The author not only describes the results of his own travels, but arranges the discoveries of Eschscholtz (to whose specimens he had access), Mertens, Wosnessenski, and others. The descriptions are very minute and complex, the remarks extremely diffuse, and the references tabulated with consummate learning. Unfortunately, in his comparisons with the British Fauna, he had no better manual than Thorpe’s Marine Conchology ; the invaluable work of Messrs. Forbes and Hanley not having been then completed. ‘The first part of the ‘ Malacozoologia Rossica,’ entitled “Beschreibung und Anatomie ganz neuer, oder fiir Russland never Cut- TONEN,” containing 151 quarto pages, with 14 plates, consists of an account of 21 species, of which 17 inhabit the Pacific shores. To an account of the prin- cipal form, Chiton Stelleri, 59 pages are devoted, All who study or deseribe species in this very interesting and difficult group, will do well to consult as much as their time allows of this comprehensive treatise. It is to be regretted that in the principles which have directed his classification, he has confined his attention to so limited a number of types; and, however burdensome to the memory may be the very numerous genera of modern writers, the sub- genera, sections, subsections and divisions found necessary to accommodate only twenty-one out of the many hundreds of known species, by no means lessen the inconvenience. Thus to descend from genus Chiton to species Pallasii, the Middendorffian student has to master the following phraseology : “« Chiton-Phznochiton-Dichachiton-Symmetrogephyrus (B. Apori) Pallasii.” The following are the Pacific species; the synonyms being those of Midden- dorff, unless enclosed in [ ]. Part I. Page. $ Plate, | Fig. Manes ae = — 37 be Ar Chiton Stelleri, Midd. Bull. 4c. Sc. Stj\Abundant near Petropaulowski OS Sisal ae oe Petersburg, vii. 8. p. 116. and the promontory of Lo- =C, amiculatus, Sow. Conch, Ill. f. 80.| patka. The Kamtschatkians = C. Sitkensis, Rve. Conch. Ic. pl. 10.| call it Keru, and eat it.— sp. 55. Steller, ?=C. ehlamys, Rve. Conch. Ic. pl. 11. sp, 60. OG eel ceccoowlbaneces - amiculatus, Pallas, Nov. Act. Acad.\Kurule Is. Petrop. ii. 235-7. pl. 7. f. 26-30. 98 | 3] segese | severe | —-— Pallasii, Midd. Bull. Ac. St. Pet. vi.\Tugurbusen, Ochotsk Sea, 117. 98 | 4| ....46 | eeesee [--—-== submarmoreus, Midd. Ditto, and Schantar Is. 98 | 5} 10 1-5 |——tunicatus, Wood ..,...aeesssseecegeys Sitcha, Kadjak, Atcha. 101 | 6} Il 1,2 |—— Wosnessenskii, Midd. Bull. Ac. St.|N. California, Sitcha, Atcha. Pet. vi. 119. Comp. Ch. setiger, King [Southern ana- logue]. Comp. Ch. setosus, Sow. 109 | 8} 12 8,9 |—— lineatus, Wood .........ssseceeceeeenes N. Calif., Sitcha, Unalaschka, ?= Ch. insignis, Rve,. Conch. Ic. pl. 22. sp. 149. f, 148, 112 | 9} 13 1,2 |—— Sitkensis, Midd, Bull. St. Pet. vi. 121)Sitcha, {non Rve,]. 114 |10} 11 4 |---— Eschscholtzii, Midd..,, ,, ,, 118|Sitcha. a Oi ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 215 Name. Locality. 6 |Chiton Merckii, Midd. Bull. St. Pet. vi. 20|Sitcha. 11 5 13 | 3,4 |—~ lividus, Midd. pdt! 2.020 Sttehe: 14 1-3 |—— Mertensii, Midd. 7 9 9, 118/Colonie Russ. = Bodejas, Cal. 14 4,5 |—— scrobiculatus, Midd. ,, ,, ,, 121)Colonie Russ.=Bodejas, Cal, cesses | veeeee | ——— Brandtii, Midd. » » 1 117\S. coast, Ochotsk; large Schan- tar Is. Buco lp ‘decwaccies giganteus, Tilesius, Mem. Ae. St.\? Kamtschatka. aed vol. ix. 1824, p. 473. pl. 16. f. 1, 2. ‘ pl. 17. f. 3 dis, 8 Sanne seceee [PP— setosus, Tilesius, Mem. Ae. St. Pet.|? Kamtschatka. vol. ix. 1824, p. 484. cesses | seeeee [2?-—— muricatus, Tilesius, Mem. Ac. St.|? Kamtschatka and Kurule Is. Pet. vol. ix. 1824, p. 483. pl. 16. f. 3. The last three are quoted on the authority of Tilesius. The second and third Parts bear date 1849, and contain the general descriptions of shells, The following are from the Pacific. Part II. 2 | All: scores suas Patella (Acmza) ceca, v. Reisewerk 32 | 5]... TE cassis, Esch. (Represents P.|Sitcha. deaurata, Gmel. Str. of Magellan.) Bn WD) beceey | caezee — patina, Esch., v. Reise. 7] ea | 6 = |——— —— scurra, Less. .....ccerseerperseere = Aemea seurrg, D’Orb. . =A, mitra, Esch. +4. mammillata, Esch. [not Nutt.] +A. marmorea, Esch, =? Lottia pallida, Gray, Beech. ame 35 | 8] woes seoeee | —— —— digitalis, Esch. ..5...,.cesseee00 Si 36) 9) 1 3. |— persona, Esch. ....,.sesereseeee +4. radiata, Esch. +A. ancylus, Esch. +A. seutum, D’Orb. (syn. excl.) ?=Lottia punctata, Gray: non Pafel- loidea punctata, Quoy and Gaim. er Astr. pl. 71. f. 40, 42. 37 |10) 1 2 |—— ?—— personoides, Midd. Preanvueuear Ae ancyloides, Midd. Bull. St. Peters. vi. 20, non Forbes. Sitcha. Kenai Bay. 38 }1l; 1 1 |=? ‘zeruginosa, Midd. seeieovsres’ Bodejas. 38 |12)} 1 4 |—— ?—— pileolus, Midd, ... ....|Sitcha. | 39 {13) «1 5 |—— Asmi, Midd. .0+.....ssescesseee ,-|Sitcha. 1 39} 1 ...... | ....-. |Fissurella violacea, Esch. ‘1829 = latimar- ?Sitcha, ginata, Sow. 1834. This well-known S. American species was found by Eschscholtz in the Bay of Conception: Wosnessenski’s quotation from Sitcha is probably incorrect. AD | 2) weccee | ceeeee —— aspera, Esch. ...ssecececsesees seeseseeee(?itcha, Mertens; Norfolk Sd., Esch. 7S | ee eee ++ |Paludinella stagnalis, Linn., v. Reise...... Ochotsk, Black Sea, Caspian. oo a ee —— aculeus, Gould .....ccecsssccseersevece Ochotsk, Lapland. 47 | 3} 10 | 11-15 |—— castanea, MGll. .....,.cccesseseceeoenre Ochotsk, Lapland. EB | A) vcceee | cccoes cingulata, Midd., y. Reise, ace eee Schantar Is. oo. || (3) a Lacuna glacialis, MGI]. .............++.+»»..|Ochotsk, Sitcha. MOMRING | cepeoe’,| eerree Littorina grandis, Midd., v. Reise. ...... Ochotsk, Schantar, Kamtsch. | G4 | G6] ,..046 | ++e25- |= subtenebrosa, Midd. .......++200..+.,.{L8]. Urup, Sea Ochotsk. G4 | 7) posse | seeees [—— Kurila, Midd,..,,.,..,..20+00e+ee0e0+-{L8] Urup, Schantar, Kenai. 216 REPORT—1856. Page. s Plate. | Fig. Name. Locality. 64} 8} 8 13-15 |Littorina Sitchana, Phil. ..........cseeeees Sitcha, New Albion, Kenai. Cr SV ee ene sees —— modesta, Phil. .....sceccscereceves ....{Sitcha, New Albion. 66 |10) ...... pete SPER EVEL. sins scee ane on aee ea anioe: Sitcha, [?]New Albion, Barclay. 68} 1) ll 1 /Turritella Eschrichtii, Midd. ...........0.0. Sitcha. 69 | 1| ...... | ...... |Margarita arctica, Leach, var. major......|Sitcha, Ochotsk, Schantar. +M. vulgaris, Leach. ?= Turbo margarita, Lowe. =M, Grenlandica, Beck. = WM. helicina, MOll., Fabr. “Bay ote 45-6 |—— sulcata, Sow. ...ccsccscccccccccsccevsces Unalaschka. TAN CAIN, cSece a] \cves' —— striata, Brod. & SOW. .s.sesssseeeee ...|(Sitcha, Lapland. = Turbo carneus, Lowe. = T. cinereus, Couth. = Margarita sordida, Hancock. 83 | 8| ...06. | sees. |Trochus ater, Less., Phil. Abbild. p. 188./Sitcha, Wosn. no. 3. pl. 5, 8. f. 6. BANNED atevos |t eacvas — euryomphalus, Jonas, Abbild. p. 15.|Sitcha, Esch. no. 4. pl. 6. f. 4. 84 [10] ...... | «..... |—— meestus, Jon. Abbild. p. 15. no. 5.pl.6.|/Sitcha, Wosn. f.5; Mke. in Zeit. f. Mal. 1844, p.113. 85 |11} 10 | 16-18 |—— modestus, Midd. cccecaseses Boek denacnes Sitcha, Wosn. 217g IP esse seseee | —— Schantaricus, Midd., v. Reise. ...... SGi|1S| ices Mikeemete —— (Turbo) Fokkesii, Jonas a etoeay seas Sitcha, Wosn. Ol slipZisnatees dllwecestes Natica aperta, Zov.......... Beeeevtins ees eee Ochotsk, Schantar. OP ial cecteen|| savace clausa, Brod. & Sow..........00.006 ../Sitcha, Ochotsk, Schantar, Kad- =N. consolidata, Couth. & Phil. jak, Kamtsch., Lapland, N. = NV. septentrionalis, Beck, Moll. Zembl. =N. ianthostoma, Desh., Guér. Mag. 1841. 93 | 4] cesses | eeeeee [——— pallida, Br. & Sow. ...cscsseeeeeeeees.| White Sea, Ochotsk. = N. borealis, Gray, Beech. pl. 37. f. 2. =WN. Gouldii, Phil. Zeit. f. Mal. 1845, p. 77, from type. = NV. suturalis, Gray, Beech. Voy. p.136, pl. 37. f. 4. 94 | 5] .ee.0. | eeeeee [—— flava, Gld. Am. Jl. Sc. Art, vol. 38.|N.Zembla, [s. Panl in Behr. Sea. 1840, p. 196. = NV. lactea, Lov., Phil. = N.Grenlandica,Beck,M6ll.&Thorpe. ?=W. suturalis, Gray. =N. pusilla, Say, teste Phil. OBA iol casscett ee wees | —— hereuleea, Midd..........+0. sevesseeeees| DOCEjaS. ?=N. Lewesii, Gld. 97 | 1| «e+... | «sees. |[Scalaria Groenlandica, Chemn., Sow., Gld.|Behring Straits. = 8. planicosta, Kien. = §. subulata, Couth., De Kay. 98 | 2] «..... | s-se0» |——— Ochotensis, Midd., v. Reise........../5- coast Ochotsk. 99 | 1| ..... | «++... |Pilidium commodum, Midd., v. Reise. ...|Schantar Is. TOR eli texesee Pll sscse Crepidula solida, Hds. ...csecsecseceees ...| Bodegas. 100 | 2} 11 3-5 Sitchana, Midd........... a Sitcha, Wosn. 101} 3) 11 6,7 |—— minuta, Midd. ..... siseottcecdeewasee Sitcha, Wosn 101 | 4| Ll 8-10 |—— grandis, Midd. .........+0+seeee0es0ees|L8. Paul, Behring Sea. TO) lal oeetacall|| Peastcos Haliotis Kamtschatkana, Jonas, Z. f. M.|Kamtsch., Unalaschka. 1845, p. 168. 104) |i ieewaie seceee [—— aquatilis, Rve......ee0rsee seveceeeceeree(Kurule Is., Rve. 4 LO | Sl ecete: |Peseces Velutina haliotoidea, O. Fabr. ......+.....|Lapl., Midd.; Kamtsch.,Chiron,} — = V. levigata, L., Gld., Rve., Donov. Desh. + = Bulla velutina, Mill. : =V, Miilleri, Desh., Guér. Mag. 1841. =?Sigaretus coriaceus, Br. & Sow. 106 | 3] cecece | esceee J——— coriacea, Pallas ....eccscocesececeeereee|urile, Pallas ; Kamt., Steller. | 106a| 4] ...... | «see |——=+ eryptospira, Midd., v. Reise..........,Schantar Is,, Ochotsk. ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 217 Page. 5 Plate. | Fig. Name. Locality. SS a Trichotropis bicarinata, Sow.....60.....ee. Behring, Schantar Is., Ochotsk. 107 | 2} 10-| 7-9 |—— imsignis, Midd. ........cccccceceveeeees Behring. UBS] veces || scares —— borealis, Br. & Sow. ...ccsssseesseeees Sitcha, Wosn., Has, =T'. costellatus, Couth. =T. Atlantica, Beck. =T. cancellata, Hds. = TI. umbilicatus, Macgil. 109 | 4} .secce | seeoee [——— imermis, Ads. .........ccesseseeves seees-(Sitcha, Ads. DLO} Dp eeses.) | ceeees Cancellaria (Tritonium (a) viridula, O.|Lapl., Behring Sea. Fabr. = Admete crispa, Moll. = Cane. Couthoyi, Jay. =C. buceinoides, Couth. =C. costellifera, Hanc. PZ || veces || sceeee ?>—— arctica, Midd. ..... sWinawanieaetsioaiseire cs Behr. Str., Wosn. EL eves: ||) voaves Purpura lapillus, Linn. ....cececcssesseeeees Sitcha & Urup, Ochot., WhiteS. +imbricata+ bizonalis, Lam. 116 |2} 9 1-3 decemcostata, Midd. ........00.» “nos Behr. Straits. EZ S| veces | seecee —— Freycinetii, Desh., v. Reise. ......... Sitch.,Och., Kamt., Behr., Aleut. EP Al cscene || ccevse —— septentrionalis, Roe, dosh ccmemaeaines Sitcha. 118 | 2/ ...... eee... |PleurotomaSchantaricum, Midd.,v. Reise.|\Ochotsk, Schantar. DUD | 3) ccceee |) cecees simplex, Midd. .......cseececssesseeees Ochotsk. I A fecease’ || cei Murex monodon, Esch. ......secsesssesccees Sitcha. 120 | 2 7 1,2 lactuca, Esch......ccsseeceees accents --|Sitcha, Kadjak. +. ferrugineus, Esch. 125 | 2) ...... | ...... |Tritonium (Trophon) clathratum, Linn...|Sitcha, Lapland. =T. Gunneri, Lov., Rve. = Fusus lamellosus, Gray, Z.B. V.pl.36. f. 13. =F, scalariformis, Gld. = Murex multicostatus, Esch. = WM. clathratus, Phil. Z. f. M. 1845, p- 78. = Trophon Bamfii, Fabr. BABING|) cesses | sadess —— (Fusus) antiquum, Linn. (non Lam.)|Kamt., Behr., Schan., Ochotsk, +T. canaliculatum, Pallas. Lapl., N. Zembl. +F. fornicatus, Gray, Z. B. V. p.117; Rve. f. 63. 138 | 5) ...... | ....«. | ——- —— decemcostatum, Say, Gld. ...|Kadj., Kenai. 140 } 6 ...... Aseeea —— —— contrarium, Linn.....0....+ +s...(Lapl., Ochotsk. ARB ZI ccesee || cos'ves —— —— deforme, Roe, ieiaeatensandacees Behr. Sea. IAL | Bh e..ce | caeess —— —— Islandicum, Chem. ....... .-...[Behr. Sea, Lapl. =F. pygmeus, Gld., Phil. ?=F. Holboellii, Moll. =Trit. gracile, Da Cost., Lov. = Murex corneus, Donov. 4 = Fusus Sabini, Hanc. Mts | 9] wcesee) | ceseee [——— Sabinii, Gray (nec auet.)......|Kenai, Lapl. ; = Buccinum S.,Gray, Parry’s Voy.p. 240. =F, Berniciensis, King, 1846. =F. Sabinii, Gray, Z. B. V. p. 117. 1146 |10} ...... | os — Schantaricum, Midd., v. Reise.|Schant., Is. Paul. J147 {11} ...006 | ..00. |-—-——- ———_ Norvegicum, Chemn........06+. Tugur B., Ochotsk. 1147 {12} «3 5,6 |——- —— Behringii, Midd. .........+0.... Behr. Sea. 4148 /13) +6 7,8 |—— —— Baerii, Midd. ........ceeeseseee Behr. Sea. 149 |14| 2 | 5-8 |———— Sitchense, Midd. .........sc00 Sitcha. MESO (15) 4 | 4,5 |—— luridum, Midd. ....c.cccccssesssseoeees Sitcha. 151 16) ...... seeeee | —— (Buccinum) undatum, Linn. ...... Lapland. MILD |u| ..c0e | ceecse [———venes ema. ts sees. Yar. Schantarica/Schantar Is. FLS7 17) ...... | coeeee tenebrosum, Hance. ......0000+- Sitcha, Lapl. =B, cyaneum, Moll. +8. undulatum, Hane. 218 - -REPORT—1856. Page. z Plate. | Fig. Name. Locality. 157 {17| ...... | ...... |Tritonium (Buccinum) tenebrosum, Hane. (continued.) +B. sericatum, Hane. An. N. H, 1846, p. 328. +B. hydrophanum, Hane. = B. boreale, Br. & Sow. NGS ATS cet eee ses —— simplex, Midd., v. Reise.......|Schant. 163 | YO) esse) vests . |-—— —— Ochotense, Midd., v. Reise....|Ochotsk. 2 164 |21 3 1-4 |-—— cancellatum, Lam. .........++-|Unalaschka, Kadjak, Kamtsech, . = Triton c., A.s. V.ix. 638. + FF. Oregonensis, Rve. NGF) V22| face ace Ml seevere (Pollia) scabrum, King* ...... Kadjak, Wosn.; [S.Am., King.] Pollia scabra, Gray, Z. B.V. pl. 36. f.16. glaciale, Linn. ....++++++9++++.--|Liapl., Ochotsk, Kamtsch. =B. Grenlandieum, Hane. ?=B. polaris, Gray, Z. B. V. p. 128. 174 |26 {6 mati Ovum, Trt. .....eceeeeeeseeeee++|Lapl., Behr, =B. ventricosum, Kr. 168 |23) 4 11 ?+-B. fusiforme, Kr. ) =Tr. ciliatum, O. Fabr. . 175127) cece ooides, Midd., v. Reise. ......|Tugur, Ochotsk, AUIS U haere atilees Bullia ampullacea, Midd. ........:s+ss0+00 Sitcha, Schantar. Ba) POU oewesa [now .... |Limacina arctica, Fadr., v. Reise. ......... Schantar. 184 | 1] 10 | 19-22 |Tritonia [Dendronotus |jarberescens, Miill.|Sitcha, Ochotsk, Lapl., N. Zem. =T. Reynoldsii, Couth. 186 | 1} 12 1-6 |Onychotheutis Kamtschatica, Midd.......|Kurile. MSZ HZ cone |) encoun Hercil Zacks, sctsttespeseserss =e -+..../Behr. Sea. 187 |...] asec soscas |[POCtOPOS; BPs, cevcgeeesepeesesec's Ceti h Behr. Sea. Part III. 1/1} 11 |11-17|Terebratula psittacea, Gmel. ..... seeeseeeee/Sitcha, Lapl. 2|2| ..,,.. | -e:5, | —— frontalis, Midd., v. Reise. ........ ....,Ochotsk. [ial hc: 4 ee etal seseey |[Placun-]Anomia patelliformis, Linn. .../Sitcha, Esch. Dileoleescssen parece —— macrochisma, Desh., v, Reise. ...... '‘Aleut., Kamt., Ochotsk. 10; 2} 12 7,8 |Pecten Islandicus, Chemn. ......++5,.++,+-++/N. Zemb., Lapl., ? Behr., ? Kamt, =P. Fabricii, Phil. 12 |9,10 =P, Pealii, Conr. 12/3 a shi do rubidus, HAS. eserssegrevrerersynnenes Sitcha, Wosn.; Aljaska, Hds, 17 | 2| ..1... | seeeee [Modiolaria nigra, Gray ..-..+:+sese+eere+ee» Ochotsk, Lapl., N. Zem, = M. levigata, Loy., Hane. = M. levis, Beck. = M.discors, Beck, Gld., Fabr., Chemn., Phil., Rve. 20 | 3 ae Hhivesices —— vernicosa, Midd., v, Reise. ...+,+,...\Ochotsk, Is. Kadj. 21 | 1| 2.2... | .seeee [Modiola modiolus, Linn. ...+++see+r¢+0e+./Sitcha, Lapl., Behr, + Mytilus barbatus, Linn, + Mod. papuana, Lam. +WM. Gibdsii, Leach. +M. grandis, Phil. * This shell is introduced under the title “ Tritonium (Buccinum, Subg. Pollia, Gray) scabrum, King et Broderip,” which reminds us of the pre-Linnzan times, and almost de- stroys the good of binomial nomenclature. Dr. Middendorff may show his philosgphical knowledge by uniting Lrophon, Chrysodomus, Buccinum, Pisania and Nassa into one genus; but he has scarcely a right to compel us to use six words (besides the authority for the specific name) in citing his shell. Its presence in the N. Boreal fauna is extraordinary. It is generally regarded as one of the characteristic species of temperate or even tropical South America. It has occurred, however, in pseudo- Mazatlan collections, and was brought by Kellett and Wood. It has the aspect of a deep-water shell, and may therefore have a wide range. ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 219 Page. z Plate, | Fig. Name. . Locality. 25 | 3 ora 20> fyi Mytilus edulis, Linn. .....008+ Deaaaah era teee-[Sitcha, Ochotsk, Kamt., Laat + M. borealis, abbreviatus, retusus, in-| Is. Paul, Kadj., Kenai, Behr. curvatus, Lam, +. pellucidus, Penn. +WM. notatus, De Kay. + M. subsavatilis, Williamson. las | scbince Nucula castrensis, Hds, ....++.++-+:seseeey+-|pitcha, Hds. ail ca5stell Ancece aretica, Br. & Sow.....++++, seesregneee{Kamtsch., Beechey. | SESE |e Cardita borealis, Conr. ......+s+++++¢+,+1+-,|Ochotsk, 9} 16 1-5 |Cardium Nuttallii, Cor. ..sseess+sseer9+-(5itcha, Kenai B,, Is. Paul. +C. Californianum, Conr, Californiense, Desh,, y, Reise, ....-.|Sitcha, Ochot., Unal.,Behr. Sea. 1 e nee | Astarte Scotica, Mat. ep Weta Ochotsk, N. Zem., Lapl, = Saree | eee —— corrugata, Brown .....es++09+ -,|Aljaska, Behy,, N. Zem., Lapl, =A, semisulcata, Hance, =A. borealis, Phil., Forbes, =A. lactea, Br. & Sow. Z. B. V, p. 152, : = Tellina atra, Pallas. 51] 2} 17 | 11-13|Venerupis Petitii, Desh.......+esege+s-sere+e |Sitcha, Behr. Sea. 52] 3) 18 1-3 gigantea, Desh. ....se.see1+ repens Sitcha, Kamtsch. 56 | 5] ...... | ,.,.,, ]Venus astartoides, Beck, v. Reise. . ../Ochotsk, Behr. 56] 1) 18 4 |Petricola cylindracea, Desh. sais .,|Sitcha. 57 | 2} 18 5-7 gibba, Midd. ....... seaspeeepsacssacsers (SatCha, Asch. OD GL Sea Saxicava pheladis, Linn. .....-++.. sesenee(itc.,Och.,Kamt., N.Zem,, Lapl, APG) < 50. sosree |Lellina solidula, Pult........+ gaan cadt acausn Tugurb,, Ochotsk, Behr., Kamt., N, Zem,, Lapl., Black Sea, ePe ed lrcass cs | ccc ees ——— nasuta, COnr. seorerserrereoeres .,|Sitcha, Behr., Ochotsk. 62] 8! 17 | 8-10 |—— lata, Gmel., y. Reise. . nae .,|Behr., Ochotsk, Tugurb,, Lapl, CGO | feccecs. |cscsece —— lutea, Gray, y. ag pte aibad Behr., Schant., St. Paul. 62 |10) ,..50. | «+-, |—=—— edentula, Br, & Sow., y. Reise....,,, Ochotsk, Unal,, Behr. OPER ccccts, | ccnase —— Bodegensis, Hds. wersssecerseeeneseres Bodegas, 66 | 2] ..... » | eseeee |(Mactra ovalis, Gld,, vy. Reise, »++++s+20129;-,,0chotsk, Behr,, Kenai. 66} 1) 19 1-4 |Lutraria maxima, Midd,.,....., sepeteeererss(Sitcha, Wosn, : [?=L, capax, Gld.] | 67) 1) 21 1-3 |Pectunculus septentrionalis, Midd. ...,,. Is, Ukamok, N.W. coast, Bell scosce | sccees Lyonsia Norwegica, Chemn., v. Reise. ,,.|Ochotsk, 69 | 1) 19 |13-15 |Mya truncata, Linn. ......+eeeessereeeneeer: Ochotsk, Lapl., Kamt. [?=M. precisa, Gld.] 70 | 2) 20 1-3 |—— arenaria, Linn. ..,.0.serseseeeeeseeee92|9itcha, Ochotsk, Lapl., N. Zem. 78 | 1) 21 | 4-10 |Machera ab Say, V. Reis...++544++,|Sitcha, Ochotsk, Behr., Kamt. In the Sibiriens pee additional catia are given with regard to the following species. ‘f163 | 1 Ga ; ray Gkitan Ballast. Mega. od, ay opemoe Tugur. “4174 | 2] 15 | 1-6 |—— Brandtii, Midd, ..,,...,,s0060++)+++2++-|Sitcha, Tugur, Schantar, 178 | 3 = i, : — submarmoreus, Midd,,........ess0000: Sitcha, Tugur, Schantar, 1183 | 4| 16 | 6a-e |Patella (Cryptobranchia) ceca, Mill. ,,,|Tugur, Schantar, +P. cerea, Moll. -+C. eandida, Couth. Some yarieties a rae resemble 4emea ceatudinal 1186 | 5 16 {|% 4: —— (Acmea) pelta, Esch. .,.,..:++.,++1;|/Sitcha, Tugur, Schantar, Una- pe laschka. 4187 | 6} 16 ied} —— —— patina, FSch..,.ccccorsseccssevees Sitcha, Tugur, Schantar, Una- i 3 +4. seutum, Esch. laschka, Aleut., Kenai, + A.scutum, D’Orb.p.479, excl. f. 8-10. A white var. from the Ochotsk Sea. 192 ||) ses 193 Joo] ass 193 Jove} ove 194 | 7} 25 TORTS) eacee 196 | 9} 25 197 |10) 10 198 11) 11 201 12] 11 202 |13) 11 203 |14) 17 204 |15; 18 206 |16} 11 208 |17] ...... 210 |18) ..... 213 {19} 12 214 |20) 17 216 |21| 25 218 |22) ...... 219 |23) 12 222 |24) 12 223 |25) 12 223 |26) 12 224 127) ....4. 10 229 |28) ...... 230 |29) 10 231 {30 ...... REPORT—1856. Fig. Name. Locality. veeees {Paludinella stagnalis, Linn. ......se0seres. S. coast Ochotsk Sea, on .dige. = Paludina stagnalis,Mke. Z.f. M. Jan. 1845, p. 37. =P. muriatica+- thermaiis, Phil. Sic. seeoee |A. forma normalis ....... sershcaseees ss tenses = Turbo ulve, Pen. = Paludina ulve, Lov. =P. pusilla, Eichwald. =Cingula levis, De Kay. eseoee |A!, forma elatior. = Paludina octona, Nilsson. =P. stagnalis, var. b, Mke. =Cyclostoma acutum, Drap. = Turbo ventrosus, Mont. [?] = Rissoa saxatilis, Moll. 3,4 |A2. forma ventricosior. = Paludina balthica, Nilss., Lov. = Cyclostoma anatinum, Drap. = Turbo muriaticus, Beudant. =Cingula minuta, Gld., De Kay. = Rissoa glabra, Alder. = Paludina ? ulva, Lyell. eeovee |Paludinella aculeus, Gld. .....secscseesceee = Cingula striata, Thorpe. =?Rissoa arctica, Lov. , 5-7 |— cingulata, Midd. ......... “ascectPouee 10, 11 |Lacuna glacialis, MGI. ...-essecseseeeeeees 4-10 |Littorina grandis, Midd. Bull. Class. Phys. Math. Ac. St. Petersd. vii. no. 16. Kurila, Midd. Bull. Class. Phys.Math. Ac. St. Petersb. vii. no. 16. 11, 12 |}«—— subtenebrosa, Midd. Bull. Class. Phys. Math. Ac. St. Petersb. vii. no. 16. 13-16 |Margarita arctica, Leach, var. major, Midd. 1-7 |Trochus Schantaricus, Midd. .......++... Schan., S. Ochotsk. 1-3 |Natica aperta, Lov.,...s.sceseceees Saiceactmas Schan., 8S. Ochotsk, Jakshina. are ees — clausa, Br. & Sow. .+0...+e++0+s04+--)9chan., S, Ochotsk. =N. consolidata, Couth., Phil. =N. septentrionalis, Beck, Mall. sees (——— pallida, Br. & Sow. ..secescccecseeeee =N. borealis, Gray, Z.B.V. pl. 37. f. 2. = N. Gouldii, Phil. Z. f. M. 1845, p. 77. 12-14 |Scalaria Ochotensis, Midd. [This most remarkable shell has the appearance of an enormous Chemnitzia; and reminds one of the Oolitic forms which go by that name. ] 4—]1 |Pilidium commodum, Midd. ...........00+ 8-10 |Velutina cryptospira, Midd. ......008++... Paecbo Trichotropis bicarinata, Br. § Sow. ...... +T. Sowerbiensis, Less. 1-9 |Purpura Freycinettii, Desh. ......cseeeee +P. attenuata, Rve. 10, 11 Tapillus, Linn. ..0..cseccsoscecosseress 17-19 |Pleurotoma Schantaricum, Midd.......... 15, 16 RUMPIGR, SUMIAM. s.02-scnvasccrsectcenses ..... |Tritonium (Fusus) antiquum, Linn. 3 Var. 1. Behringiana ...s.ccercsceeessueee Var. 2. communis,+-fornicatus, Rye. oseeee — contrarium, Linn. wer.sceceeee 7-9 |—— Schantaricum, Midd.......... yecanenel cabeve (Fusus) Norvegicum, Chemn......0 Ochotsk Sea. S. coast Ochotsk. Schan. Schan., §. Ochotsk. Schan., 8. Ochotsk. Schan., S. Ochotsk, Kurile. S. Ochotsk (Is. Segneka). Schan., 8. Ochotsk. Schan., S. Ochotsk. S. Ochotsk (Bay. Nichta). S. Ochotsk. Schan. Schan., 8. Ochotsk, Tugur. S. Ochotsk. S. Ochotsk. Schan., S. Ochotsk. 8. Ochotsk. Behring Sea. - S. Ochotsk, Tugur. Schan. Tugur. b apes + oS PSS RP > tae, ON MOLLUSCA OF THE ie, OF NORTH AMERICA. 221 Name. Tritonium (Buccinum) undatum, var. |Schan. Schantarica. . |———— simplex, Midd. Bull.&c.vii.no.16|Schan. — — Ochotense, Midd.......do...... —— —— ovoides, Midd. ...102...d0...00. —— tenebrosum, Hanc. [pl. 9, err. typ. ] Bullia ampullacea, Midd. [pl. 17. fig. 1-3,|Schan., Tugur. err. typ.] Limacina arctica, Fabr. ......... malen saceaisice =T. helicialis, Lam., Rve. Terebratula frontalis, Midd. Anomia macroschisma, Desh Modiolaria vernicosa, Midd. .. . [Mytilus edulis, Lim. ....ccscsscscecerseevees Cardita borealis, Conr. ? Cardita spurca, Sow. Cardium Californiense, Desh. (nec Conr.)|Schan., S. Ochotsk, Tugur. Astarte Scotica, Maton & Rack.........0 S. Ochotsk. =A. semisulcata, Lov., Phil., Mll. =A. Garensis, ?var. Lyell. =A. lactea, Gld. = Venus sulcata, Mont. Venus Astartoides, Beck, u. sp..... ROOTES Saxicava pholadis, Linm........sssecveeeee ie =8. gallicana, Lam. =8. rugosa, Lam. = Mytilus rugosus, Penn. =. Grenlandica, Pot. & Mich. =8. distorta, Say, Gld. = Mya byssifera, Fabr. =Solen minutus, Wood. + Hiatella oblonga, Tutt. Tellina nasuta, Cons. ....sccscsescecssscseees —— lata, Gmel. (nec Quoy & Gaim.).... =T. calearea, Hanl., Lyell, Moll. +T. proxima, Bronn, Hanl., Gray. =T. triangularis, Lyell. =T. sordida, Couth. = Sanguinolaria s., Gould. = Macroma tenera, Leach. ——* lutea, Gray c.cccccessccverscees Saas = T. alternidentata, Br. & Sow. =T. Guildfordie, Gray. — edentula, Br. & Sow.......seccsereeees —— solidula, Pult., Hanl., Wood, Lam., Kryn. =Loripes roseus, Andrj. = T. carnaria, Penn., not Linn, = T, balthica, Phil., Lyell. =T. grenlandica, Lyell. =T. fusca, Say = Psammobia f. = San- guinolaria f. =T. frigida, Hanl. =T7. Fabricii, Hanl. = T. inconspica, Br. & Sow. [Comp.Sanguinolaria Californica,Conr.] Mactra ovalis, Gid. [p. 263, err. typ.] .../S. Ochotsk, Tugur. = M. ponderosa, Phil. =M. similis, Gray, Z. B. V. p. 154. pl. 44. f. 8. S. Ochotsk, Tugur, S. Ochotsk. Schantar Is. S. Ochotsk, Tugur. S. Ochotsk. 222 REPORT—1856. Page. Z| Plate. Fig. Name. Locality. 264 |56] 24 | 8-11 |Lyonsia Norvegica, Chemn. ...s00.cssece0e Schant., S, Ochotsk, Tugur. =L. striata, Turt. (Mya str., Mont.) =. gibbosa, Hane. = Mya hyalina, Conr. teste Couth. = Pandorina arenosa, MOll. - = Amphidesma corbuloides, Lam. = Osteodesma corbuloides, Desh. = 0. hyalina, Couth., Gld., De Kay. 266 \57| 25 | 11=14 |Mya truncata, Linn. ........c.ccccesseseeses S. Ochotsk. +M. Uddevalensis, Hanc. GB [DS]: aveceek| 'eceees ——— arénaria, Linn. .cssecsesvidecs Wea ieatee S. Ochotsk. 209 199|\osonen ll) cance « |Panopza Norvegica, Spengler .......0060 S. Ochotsk, Tugur, ZOO TIGO) ceowena til varara Macheera Costata, Say is....ssaccceveoesee S$. Ochotsk (Lebashja). =Solecurtus Nuttallii, Conr. =Solen nitidus, Chen. : =8S. splendens, Chen. =. Americanus, Chen. =S. medius, Gray, Z. B. V. p. 153. pl. 44. f, 2. =S. maximus, Wood (nec Chemn.) p- 129. pl. 31. f. 3. ?=8S, tenuis, Brod. & Sow. ?=8, altus, Brod. & Sow. The freshwater and land shells described in this work, pp. 273-308, appear to belong exclusively, either to the general North temperate fauna of the old world, or to the local fauna of the district. They are distributed by Mid- dendorff under three heads, pp. 389 et seg. (1) Circumpolar Fauna: Unio margaritifera, Pianorbis albus, Limnzeus stagnalis and palustris, Physa hyp- norum, Succinea putris, Helix pulchella, pura and fulva, Achatina lubrica, | Vitrina pellucida. (2) Boreal Fauna: Unio pictorum and batavus, Anodonta cellensis and anatina, Pisidium obliquum, Cyclas cornea and calyculata, Planorbis corneus, complanatus, contortus, leucostoma and vortex, Limnzus auricularius, truncatulus, leucostomus, Physa fontinalis, Paludina Kikxii and tentaculata, Valvata piscinalis, Helix ruderata, Schrenkii, carthusiana and hispida, and Bulimus obscurus. (3) Central Asiatic Fuuna: Unio Dahuricus and Mongolicus, Anodonta herculea, and Limnzus Gebleri. The author enters at considerable length, pp. 351+389, into the influence of Zones, Depths, Temperature and Saltness on the distribution and. changes of mollusks; and gives full details of the peculiarities of several specific and generic forms, pp. 330-342. In pp. 309=463, the author distributes the Russian shells into their various Zoological provinces. With the Aral-Kas- pian, the Black Sea* and the very limited Baltic faunas, we have now no concern. The Polar fauna (p. 318 e¢ seg.) is divided into three sections :— A. The Atlantic species, 30 in number. B. Those of the Behring Sea, 26 ; and C. the Circumpolar species, 54. To this list are added 50 species, which have not yet been found in the Russian dominions. * Middendorff gives the following species as common to the temperate latitudes on both sides of the Atlantic :—Littorina rudis, Fusus muricatus, Crepidula ungutformis, Dentalium dentalis, Anomia ephippium, Solen ensis, Pecten varius, Lima squamosa. Also the following as common to the Mediterranean and the West Indies:—Conus Mediterraneus, Columbella mercatoria, Nassa crenulata, Littorina muricata and neritoides, Cerithium lima, Tellina carnaria, and Rotella lineata. Pp. 346-7. i ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 223 B. Polar Fauna of the Behring Sea. Chiton submarmoreus, tunicatus and vestitus. Patella patina, pelta. Paludinella ? cingulata. Littorina subtenebrosa, Sitchana, grandis. Margarita sulcata. Scalaria Ochotensis. - Crepidula grandis. __ Trichotropis insignis. Cancellaria arctica. Purpura Freycinetii, decemeostata, Pleurotoma Schantaricum, simplex. Tritonium (Fusus) Behringii, Baerii, Bullia ampullacea. [Placun-]Anomia macrochisma. Modiola vernicosa. Nucula arctica. Tellina edentula, lutea. : C. Cireumpolar Species, p. 319. Patella czeca. Paludinella stagnalis, aculeus. Lacuna glacialis. Margarita striata, arctica. Natica pallida, clausa, aperta, flava, heli- coides. Scalaria groenlandica. Velutina haliotoidea. Trichotropis borealis, bicarinata. Purpura lapillus. Tritonium (Trophon) clathratum. T. (Fusus) antiquum, contrarium, Is- landicum, Sabinii, Norvegicum, 10-cos- tatum, T. (Buccinum) undatum, tenebrosum, ovum. Limacina arctica. Onychotheutis Bergii, Kamtschatica. Terebratula psittacea, - Chiton Pallasii and amiculatus. Trochus Schantaricus. Pilidium commodum. Pacific :— _ Chiton Stelleri, Brandtii, lineatus. Littorina Kurila. Velutina coriacea, spongiosa. Haliotis Kamtschatkana, aquatilis. [Placun-] Anomia patelliformis. Pecten Islandicus. Modiola modiolus, nigra. Mytilus edulis. Nucula pygmea. Cardita borealis. sara Nuttallii. [Probably belongs to B. Astarte Danmoniensis, Scotica, corrugata, compressa. Venus Astartoides. Saxicava pholadis. Tellina solidula, lata. Mactra ovalis. Lyonsia Norvegica. Mya truncata, arenaria. Panopza Norvegica. Machera costata. An analysis of the species belonging to the Pacific waters is given in pp: 349 et seg. The following are as yet only known from the Asiatic coast :— Tritonium Schantaricum, simplex, Ocho- tense, ooides, cancellatum. Terebratula frontalis, The following have been found both on the east and west sides of the Modiola cultellus. Cardium Nuttallii, Californiense. Venerupis gigantea, Petitii. Tellina nasuta. Turritella Eschrichtii. ‘Crepidula Sitchana, minuta. Of the species (so far as we yet know) peculiar to the American shores, the following are recorded by Middendorff as not having been found below Sitcha; the list, however, will have to be materially modified :— Chiton Sitchensis, lividus, Eschscholzii, Trichotropis insignis. Merckii. Purpura septentrionalis. - Patella digitalis, persona, personoides, Tritonium Sitchense, luridum. _pileolus, Asmi. Murex lactuca, monodon. Pecten rubidus. Petricola gibba. Nucula castrensis. _ Pectunculus septentrionalis, Trochus modestus. Dentalium politum. 224 REPORT—1856. The following list of species common to Sitcha and California will have to be considerably extended :— Fissurella violacea, aspera. Tritonium scabrum. Patella scurra. Petricola cylindracea. Littorina modesta and aspera. Lutraria maxima. Trochus ater, moestus, Fokkesii, euryom- phalus. The following are regarded by Middendorff as peculiar to the Californian province :— Chiton Mertensii, scrobiculatus. Crepidula solida. Patella zeruginosa. Tellina Bodegensis. Natica herculza. The very abnormal appearance of the tropical Létorina aspera and Callo- poma fluctuosum, in these Northern lists, awaits confirmation. The L. aspera of Barclay may be founded on ballast specimens ; or it may be a misnorher for the L. planavis of Nutt., as ordinary coarse specimens of the two might easily be mistaken. The Callopoma, which appears to extend along the Califor- nian coast, may also have reached Sitcha through human instrumentality. Another circumstance pointed out by Middendorff is remarkable: that two of the largest species of Crepidule known, are found on the northern shores of America; one on the Pacific, the other on the Atlantic side. 45. In the years 1843-46, H.M.S. Samarang sailed under the command of Capt. Sir E. Belcher to the East Indies. Although the expedition did not touch upon the western coast of America, there appear in the “ Zoology : Mollusca, by A. Adams and L. Reeve; London 1850,” the two following species :— “P, 70. pl. 9. f. 7 a,b. Calyptrea trigonalis. China Sea.” This scarcely differs in any essential particular from Crucibulum lignarium, Brod., and its varieties from South America. The trigonal form may be an accident of growth. *P, 78. pl. 21. f. 17. Artemis Dunkeri, Phil. Eastern Seas.” This is the abundant and characteristic species of the Mazatlan district, extending along the coast of Peru. The habitat is probably erroneous. In all other respects, as might be expected, the species described in this beautiful and most instructive work are entirely distinct from those of the W. American coast. 46. In the “ Zeitschrift fiir Malakozoologie, von Dr. Karl Theodor Menke und Dr. Louis Pfeiffer, Cassel, 1846,” pp. 19-21, 51-55, Dr. R. A. Philippi describes the following species from Mazatlan, on the authority of one of his own family :— 2 Page. No, 19 1. Corbula alba, Phil. Resembles the Italian fossil C. carinata. Perhaps — it is the C. bicarinata, Sow. 19 2. Tellina cicercula, Phil. Perhaps=Strigilla carnaria, jun. Vide B. M. Maz. Cat. p. 41. no. 66. 19 3. T. lenticula, Phil. (Strigilia). 20 4. T. dichotoma, Phil. (Strigilla). 20 «5. T.ervilia, Phil. (Strigilla). In his Abbild. &. Aug. 1846, p. 24, he quotes Tellina (Strigilla) pisiformis and Diplodonta semiaspera, as common to Mazatlan and the Caribbzean Sea. 20 . Diplodonta obliqua, Phil. 6 21 7. Lucina cancellaris, Phil. 21 8, Patella pediculus, Phil. Peace ee adit cn ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 225 18. Siphonaria Lecanium, Phil. 51 19. Trochus disculus, Phil. (Modulus). 52 20. Buccinum nucleolus, Phil. 2 An Anachis. Described as a miniature edition of B. prismaticum. Comp. B. Antoni, Dkv., Zeit. f. Mal. 1847, p. 61. no. 6, “ Mexico, Hegewisch,” described as resembling the same shell. 53 23. Terebra fulgurata, Phil. 53 24. Columbella pallida, Phil. Resembles Anachis azora, Ducl. 54 25. C. spadicea, Phil. ?Resembles A. costulata, Brod. & Sow. 54 26. C. teniata, Phil. 55 27. Dentalium hyalinum, Phil. 47, The Mexican War, carried on by the United States, 1846-1848, against their sister republic*, ending in the extension of slavery, was indirectly the means of adding to our knowledge of the Californian and Mexican faunas. Three of the officers, viz. Col. E. Jewett (of Utica, N.Y.) and Major William Rich (of Washington) of the army, and Lieut. T. P. Green of the navy, made collections at different stations from Panama to San Francisco, the whole of which have passed through the hands of Dr. Gould for examination. The number of species collected by Col. Jewett was about 221; by Major Rich, 130; by Lieut. Green, about 172; in all, perhaps 440 species. Many of them were collected alive, and of a large part the localities. were noted at the time. It is too much to expect that gentlemen engaged in so fearful and exciting a trade should be able to exercise the calm, patient accuracy needed for scientific pursuits. On doubtful points, therefore, the evidence may need confirmation: still it speaks much for the care and interest for science which these gentlemen manifested, that the supposed errors are few and comparatively unimportant. Several species thought to be new were described by Dr. Gould in the ‘ Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist.’ Noy. 1851; and have been since reprinted, with additional descriptions and three plates, under the title ‘“ Descriptions of Shells from the Gulf of Cali- fornia and the Pacific Coasts of Mexico and California, by Augustus A. Gould, M.D.” There is no date, but the work was received last year in this country. In order to promote harmony of nomenclature between the writers in England and America, Dr. Gould ventured to entrust the whole of his valuable collections from the west coast of N. America to the writer, although unknown to him; by whom they were carefully collated with the specimens in the British Museum and the cabinets of Mr. Cuming and Mr. Nuttali+. The result, so far as the new species are concerned, is em- bodied in a paper laid before the Zoological Society last June; and, so far as relates to the identification of previous species, in the following lists. Of _ many, however, the specimens had only been lent to Dr. Gould for examina- _ tion, and have therefore not been seen in this country. When the identifica- tions of species are erroneous, according to English interpretations, the name assigned by Dr. Gould is retained as his own, with the supposed correct one added ; in order that the meaning of the species as used by that author may be understood in his other writings. The very interesting locality-notes of Messrs. Jewett and Green contain several entirely. unexpected statements, Panama and Mazatlan species being quoted from Sta. Barbara, and vice versd. Some few well-known W. Indian forms also appear from Acapulco and Panama; which it is more natural to regard as importations than as “ repre- sentative species.’ The same may be said of the remarkable appearance of Livona pica at Sta. Barbara. When we remember the errors that have _ * Vide A. A. Livermore’s War with Mexico Reviewed. Boston, 1850. + A large part of the shells in the following lists, however, were not sent to this country ; having probably only passed through Dr. Gould’s hands for examination, 1856. Q 226 REPORT—1856. crept into the works of the most experienced writers, it is not passing the least reflection on the statements of these scientific officers, when we claim liberty to suspend our judgment till the unexpected results have been verified. The principal value of Major Rich’s collection (as of those made by Capt. Kellett and Lieut. Wood), appears to be the accumulation of rare and interesting specimens: for geographical purposes, as most of the habitats are simply divided between Upper and Lower California, it cannot be regarded as of much authority. Of the following species, sent with the others, the name of the collector is not given. Sanguinolaria Nuttallii, Conr. =decora, | Helix sportella (384, young shell). ?— Hds. San Diego. Donaz bella, Desh.. Lower California. sulcatus, Phil. Zeit. f. Mal. 1847, p- 76. no. 12, 2— Dione chionea, Mke. 2?— Mytilus bifurcatus, Cony. “ Calif. coast somewhere.” Sandw. Is., teste Conr. Crenella coarctata, Dkr. Arca ?lurida (or vespertilio). ?Mazatlan. solida, Sow. California.: Ostrea Columbiensis, Hanl., grandis. Lower California. rufa. Of two specimens thus named, the larger appears =O. Virginica, jun.; the smaller may be the young of the elongated form of O. iridescens. Calif. Helix Nuttalliana, Lea, =fidelis, Gray. Oregon. Townsendiana, Lea. Oregon. — devia,Gld.=Baskervillii, Pfr. Oreg. — Nickliniana, Lea, =vineta, Val. (not =Californica, Rve.) Upper California. eruginosa, Gld. =Townsendiana, var. Pfr. San Francisco. on Arca Haliotis ?Kamtschatkana: dead. Hipponyz serratus, Cpr. ?— mitrula, Lam. 2?— Modulus dorsuosus, Gld. =duplicatus, var. A. Ad. =disculus, Phil. ?— Modulus ?lenticularis, Chemn. Acapulco. [Probably the W. Indian sp. imported.] Cerithium interruptum, Mke. ?— Ovulum secale. ?— <6 2 avena, Sow. =simile, Rve. =va- riabilis, C. B. Ad.” 2?— Pleurotoma funiculata, Sow. Lower Calif, Drillia albovallosa, Cpr. ?— Terebra albocincta, Cpr. (three dead sp.). Marginella imbricata, Hds. Sta. Barbara. Oliva gracilis, Brod. & Sow. ?Panama. [This appears exactly the W. I. species. } “ Columbella terpsichore and pygmea, Ja- maica.” Pisania 2articulata, =P. pusio, W. I. teste Cuming. ?Panama. Trophon crassilabrum, Gray. ?Jamaica, Murex armatus [not hexagonus], Ad. ?— Pees The following is a list of the new species described by Dr, Gould in the “ Mexican and Californian Shells,” and by the writer in the ‘ Proceedings of the Zoological Society,’ July 8th, 1856; the numbers referring to the latter— the page, plate and figure to the former. Name. non C. B. Ad. =P. robusta, Sow.=P. sinuosa, Conr. .|...|««-|Corbula polychroma, Cpr. ..,.0...ceseseeees Srawascaauay 485 4/17/15) 6\Osteodesma nitidum, Gid.......... Probably = Lyonsia Californica, Conr. jun. cesfece Amphidesma flavescens, Gid....... = Semele proxima, B. M. Maz. Cat. p. 28. no. 40, Reet e ee ee ee en erase trees PPereeeeererre ree re tires 6/24/16] 1|Tellina miniata, Gld. Proc. B. N. H. S. Nov. 1851... =Sanguinolaria purpurea, Desh. P. Z. 8. 1854, p. 346. no. 137 ; B. M. Maz. Cat. p. 31. no. 46. 7\25|16| 2|—— tersa, Gld. .....cccceoeceee aac Locality. San Diego, Green. Guaymas, Green. Sta. Barbara, Jewett; Gulf Calif., Lieut. Shipley. San Diego, Lieut. Green. San Juan, Lieut. Green. Panama, Col. Jewett. Sta. Barbara, Lieut. Green.) — . ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 227 Name. Tellina pura, Gld. ...ccccccccseecseececeereeecseeeseeeeeess(Panama, Col. Jewett, teste Gld. Imp., San Diego & Mazatlan, Lieut. Green, teste Gld. MS. San Juan, Lieut. Green. Mazatlan, Col. Jewett. 9/26)16| 5|—— gemma, Gd. ........cceesecneesennee eta secevecccassues 10/26)16) 4) —— (Strigilla) fucata, Gid. Proc.B.S.N.H.1851,p. 91. = Strigilla carnaria, B. M. Maz. Cat. p. 39. no. 66. 8|/Donax flexuosus, Gld. ....cccccccceccccecccccssecceecves aa 9|-—— obesus, Gid. Proc. B. S. N. H. 1851, . '90.. =D. Californicus, Conr., non Desh. = D. levigatus, Desh. 4|Mactra mendica, Gid. Proc. B. 8. N. H. 1851, p. 88. = Gnathodon trigona, Petit, B. M. Maz. Cat. p. 52. no. 81. ee ie Lutraria ventricosa, Gid. Proc. B.S, N. H. 1851, p. 89. = Mactra exoleta, Gray. 7|/—— undulata, Gid. Proc. B. S. N. H. 1851, p. 89... Probably = Mactra elegans, Sow. Tank. Cat. App. a aera Tapes gracilis, G/d. MS.,...+sssseessssesssseeesssreneeenees San Pedro, W. P. Blake. —— tenerrima, Cpr. ........ssseceesssceee rerteccrtr er ee Panama, Col. Jewett. 18)33 15 10|Venus tantilla, Gld. [Trigona] ........cscceceesscecescees Sta. Barbara, Col. Jewett. 19/23)15| 2)Arthemis saccata, Gid. Proc. B. S. N. H. 1851, p. ‘Ql. Mazatlan, Lieut. Green. = Cyclina subquadrata, Hanl. aa Be Cardium luteolabrum, Gid. Proc. B.S.N. H. 1851, p.91|San Diego, Lieut. Green. Sta. Barbara, Col. Jewett. «(San Diego, Lieut. Green. Mazatlan, Lieut. Green. Mazatlan, Lieut. Green. La Paz, Lieut. Green. o=€, nanthocheilum, Gld. MS. Cat. soseee{ese|-—— Cruentatum, Gld. MS. ......cceccsesecevscesece ....-|San Pedro, W. P. Blake. Betlenalere Lucina Artemidis, Cpr. ......cesesesccsseccceesceeeeeoeeeee{? ACapulco.—Mus. Gld. orbella, Gid. Proc. B. 8. N. H. 1851, p.90..... .|San Diego, Lieut. Green; ?= Diplodonta semiaspera, var. Sta. Barbara, Col. Jewett, and Nuttall. ? Mazatlan, Col. Jewett. 5/Cyrena altilis, Gld..........sccceeee dacccpeaseeune fa ozaae Pare: = Cyrena Mexicana, var. Reniires IANOGON: CicOnia, Gld. . 27:.0<<0+socceceugausasavacdabosteaud = Anodon glauca, Val. 8|Mytilus glomeratus, Gld.Proc. B.S. N. H. 1851, p. 92|San Francisco, Maj. Rich. Bra haamtee’ Modiola nitens, Cpr. ......cescsssesesecoenesesereesceeseees| California. 9|Lithodomus falcatus, Gld. Brac. B.S.N. H. 1851, p. 92|Monterey, Maj. Rich. In =Lithophagus Gruneri, Phil. (N. Zeal. Mus. Cum -)*| hard marly clay. -}.0.|ByssOarca Pernoides, Cpr. ...cscceccecsscecetecccncsceeecer San Diego, Webb. 7\|Avicula sterna, Gld. Proc. B. S. N. H. 1851, p. 93.../Panama, C. B. dd.; ?Ma- =A. Atlantica, Mke. not Lam, zatlan, Lieut. Green. 6\Lima tetrica, Gid. Proc. B. S. N. H. 1851, p. 93......|La Paz, Maj. Rich. 2\Bulimus vegetus, Gid....... pieaais Gaaiuanaaeeonae sesevseeee(an Juan, Lieut. Green. =B. pallidior, Sow. teste Cum. 1|—— vesicalis, Gid....... “BRAS Ra FARRAR e fer re ee cene ae Lower Calif., Maj. Rich. Ee OXCCISUS,, Gidducscadunenaddads cese cvsccdWecescanckvesecess California, Maj. Rich. : .|LowerCalifornia, Maj. Rich. Sta. Barbara, Col. Jewett. Sta. Barbara, Col. Jewett. San Diego, teste Gid. San Diego, W. P. Blake. Sta. Barbara, Col. Jewett. On kelp or Zoophytes. Monterey, Lieut. Green. ? Mexico, Lieut. Green. 9|——_ Mondiale cerealis, Gld eas ceusadens scanaenuavesea= Reuhi whenltay GUE MSPs ia cdeds deswscetetlve accede Becises|..: —— (Haminea) vesicula, GId. .......c0..sseeecceeceneees 5j|Acmeea paleacea, Gld. ..s.cccsecceseecees hae amapere he ane = Nacella depicta, Hds. 141) 8)14)11)Trochus marcidus, Gd. ........csccssceseeescnscees oie vane = Omphalius Pfeifferi, Phil. teste Cum. = Chlorostoma maculosum, A. Ad. Dr. Gould’s shell is perhaps that of Adams; while his 7. Montereyi, Rve., appears to be the O. Pfeifferi, Phil, * This appears absolutely identical with the [?] New Zealand shell. It has no incrustation Outside the epidermis. One of Mr, Cuming’s species has an internal hinge-lamina. e2 3 ie REPORT—1856. 2} 8). A é 2\ 2 Name. Locality, 42| 9)...1... Trochus (Monodonta) pyriformis, Gld................++.|San Diego, Lieut. Green. = Osilinus gallina, Forbes, var. 43} 8}...}... —— picoides, Gid............. ee ee seseseeeseeeeeeee[Sta. Barbara, Col. Jewett ; =Livona pica, teste Cuming, &c. 5 sp. (part living). 44), --|Phasianella compta, Gld. MS. ...secsereseovecsvececeeees Sta. Barbara, Col. Jewett; San Diego, Dr. Webb, & W. P. Blake. 45)...|...|...|Cracibulum Jewettii, Cpr....ccccccssseccsresscees seeeeese-| Mazatlan, Col. Jewett, 1 sp. 46) 4)14) 7\Crepidula explanata, Gid. ....... ee Ar bake sens seeeeeeeee|Monterey, Lieut. Green; = C. exuviata, Nutt. Jay’s Cat. 3027. Lower Cal., Maj. Rich, =C. perforans, Val. 47/10\14/12)/Modulus dorsuosus, Gld......sscceecssseeceeeceeeseseeseee/ Acapulco, Col. Jewett. 48) 7|14/1OiNarica ovoidea; Ga: soi... .deecvsseccevsccccscccctocevece ..| Purchased at Mazatlan,” This shell belongs to Zsapis, H. & A. Ad., which] Col. Jewett. is a Fossarus, with a columellar callosity, like Purpura columellaris. 49)...|...|...|?Lacuna unifasciata, Cpr. ........ ide demeewe cece. toy ...|Sta. Barbara, Col. Jewett. 50}...|...|...|Cerithidea albonodosa, Cpr. ......... Bee aetaeesh seccre ..\San Diego, Dr. Webb. 51]...]...|...,——— fuscata, Gld. MS. ......0c0.08 iebesrecksscosseedsoeees(Nall Dieto, WV. Pa blakes Probably = C. sacrata, var. 52/13/14/20|/ Erato leucopheea, Gid. ......eccsceeeeee paece Gee iwasede .++./Sta. Barbara, Col. Jewett. =(probably) £. columbelia, Mke. 53] 7/14|19|/Terebra arguta, Gld. ...... Renee nets aextees oe seoseceeeess(an Juan, Lieut. Green. =T. fulgurata, Phil. D4 TS L421 Comms rays; Ga» cceccsecs aos ettecesdeteeddriee attaert teal Sta. Barbara, Col. Jewett. Eo ROE 23 OM PES OUD ines acacaoeseecsvasdtaccossissucdecenavee Sta. Barbara, Col. Jewett. = C. purpurascens, jun., rubbed, teste Cuming. =6. achatinus, Mke. non Chemn. 56)15}14/22)-——. pusillus, G@ld.........c.cecceeee eee ceccecedcccscverseees| Mazatlan, Col. Jewett. 57|12)14)13|Odostomia achates, Gid. [Obeliscus] .........secee000- Mazatlan, Col. Jewett. Comp. O. clavulus, A. Ad. 98/11}14)14|—— gravida, Gld. ..........cceceeeeees Ecoodesoud Pe ogscicodcs Sta. Barbara, Col. Jewett. Closely resembles O. conoidea. 59)10/14/15|/Chemnitzia tenuicula, Gid.......... wean aeceolld Beat .+...(9ta. Barbara, Col. Jewett. 69)11/14/16|—— torquata, Gld. ..ccecsececescsececascenees Peadaceeaee “Obtained at Sta. Barb.” 61] 6/14/17|Sigaretus debilis, Gld............cceccceseeeseeeee seeseveee|La Paz, Lieut. Green. (32) ae S| Fasciolaria’bistridta; Cpr) is..dsce.ves eocsleevesuseeenesee Panama, teste Gld. Glee: leew Olivella intorta, Cpr. ...ccscesceesees PR eS Ty Sone San Juan, Lieut. Green. G4) cca] coluee Marginella Jewettii, Cpr. .......00..05 eeacbaseeehe nets ../Sta. Barbara, Col. Jewett. 65}.-.|2..|.0. Columbella Santa-Barbarensis, Cpr....... seneveres cesses Sta. Barbara, Col. Jewett. 66}...}...]... ?Nitidella Gouldii, Cpr. .........sesceseeeeee Sea pecan tecc Sta. Barbara, Col. Jewett. 67|12/14/18)/Fusus ambustus, Gid.......... Uvbivesesteaseeds sestteton sees Mazatlan, Lieut. Green. 68/33}...]... Purpura pansa, Gld............ SeFateoctevedecteccisvederdec W. coast America. = Purpura patula, auct. Collected by Col. Jewett. N.B.—The Numbers refer to Dr. Gould’s MS. lists. The habitats in italics claim most authority. Pholas concamerata, Desh. 85. Mon-| Corbula tenuis, Sow. “?=alba, Phil.” 79. terey. _|. Mazatlan. Osteodesma nitida, Gld. (San Blas: Mus. | Sanguinolaria grandis, Gmel., Hds. 211. Cum.) 181. Sta. Barbara. . |. San Francisco. Corbula bicarinata, Sow. (dead valves). | Amphidesma roseum, Gld. (not Sow.) = 9. Sta. Barbara. decisa, Conr.. 3. Sta. Barbara. — polychroma, Sow. [Gulf Calif. Lieut. | Tellina tersa, Gld. 71*. Panama (“ not Shipley.] 8. Sta. Barbara. Maz.”’). ovulata, Gld. =nasuta, Sow. 10.| “ Strigilla fucata, Gld. =Tellina feliz, Sta. Barbara. (Dead valves.) .. | Ad.’ (=S. carnaria.). 194, Panama. at er he eae ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. Donax navicula, Hanl. 74, Panama. . rostratus, C. B. Ad. = culminatus, B.M. Cat. 37. Sta. Barbara, “ very . plentiful.” [?] Non Nutt. Californicus, Conr. 37*. Sta.Barb. —— gracilis, Hanl. 183. Sta. Barbara. flexuosus, Gld. Sta. Barbara. Mactra Californica, Conr. 71*. Pan. [?] : angulata, Gray. 109. Panama, Petricola lamellifera, Cony. = Cordiert, Desh. 88, 107.: Monterey (do. Hart- weg). (Young shell has radiating ribs like Venus gnidia, &c.) — lamellifera, var. = Cordieri, Desh. 88. Monterey. — carditoides, Conr. ?= cylindracea, Desh. 84. Monterey, with Bryozoon. 2+ P. Californica, Conr. = arcuata, Desh. Venus discors, Sow. 228, 229. Panama. , Gld. =grata, Say. 28. Guay- mas. amathusia, Phil. 231. Panama. — gnidia, Sow. 227. Panama. Anomalocardia subrugosa, Sow. 230. Pan. Tapes tenerrima, Cpr. 187. Panama. Cytherea lupinaria, Less. 117. Mazatlan. -—— affinis, Gld. =tortuosa, Brod. 111. Panama. aurantia, Hanl. 124. Mazatlan. Sta. Barbara. [?] Trigona crassatelloides, Conr. 2. Barbara. —_— Sta. - 113. Mazatlan. [2] — ?radiata, var. Hindsii, but more resembles the Tr. mactroides. Dead valves. 189. Acapulco. — planulata, Sow. 94. Mazatlan. — tantillus, Gld. 14. Sta. Barbara. Dosinia Dunkeri, Phil. 112. Panama. Cardita volucris, Gld. =affinis, Rve. ? Cardium biangulatum, Sow. 78. Panama. obovale, Sow. 184. Panama. —— graniferum, Brod.& Sow. 191. Maz. gemmatum, 55. maculosum, Kien. 153. “ Panama” @ prima manu, and probably correct ; afterwards altered to “‘ San Francisco.” _ Lueina orbella, Gld. ? = Diplodonta semi- aspera, var. 83. Sta. Barbara. Modiola recta, Conr. 87. Sta. Barbara. Lithophagus falcatus, Gld. =L.Gruneri, Phil. 86. Monterey. _ Area gradata, Brod. & Sow. 84. ? Ma- zatlan. » Brod. & Sow. 8. Monterey. -—— concinna, Gld. = similis, C. B. Ad. =tuberculosa, var. 82. ? Mazatlan. _ — tuberculosa, Sow. 236. Lower Cal. — grandis, Sow. 186, Panama. 229 Arca nux, Sow. 186 bis. Panama. Pacifica, Sow. Panama. alternata, Sow, 81. ? Mazatlan. , sp. ind. Dead valves. 185. ? Pectunculus nequalis, Gld. = assimilis, teste Cum. 4. Sta. Barbara. [?] ——- ?tessellatus. (Dead valves.) 190. ? Mazatlan. -——- parcipictus, Sow. 77. Mazatlan. Nucula polita. 223, Sta. Barbara. Avicula sterna, Gld. 93. Panama. Lima angulata, Sow. 180. Acapulco. Pecten monotimeris, Cony. + latiauritus, teste Nutt. 179. Sta. Barbara. Bulla cerealis, Gld. 20. Sta. Barbara. punctulata, A. Ad. 56. Acapulco. culcitella, Gld. 62. Sta. Barbara. Stphonaria gigantea. 206. Acapulco. Chiton ornatus, Nutt. 197. Sta. Barbara. lineatus, Wood. 198. Panama. “muscosus, G. == Collei, Rve.” = Hindsii, Sow. 199. Panama. —— Stokesii, Brod. 200. San Francisco. Californicus, Gld. = scaber, Rve. 201. Sta. Barbara. — Sitkensis, Rve. = Stelleri,- Midd. 202. Monterey [?]. Acmea paliacea, Gld. =Nacella depicta, Hds. 8. Sta. Barbara. Nacella incessa, Hds. (from kelp). 6. Sta. Barbara. Acmea patina, var. Esch. (= tessellata, Nutt.) 7. Sta. Barbara. — gigantea, = Kochii, Phil. Monterey. pintadina, Gld. = verriculata, Rve. = patina, var. Esch. 207. San Frane. scabra, Gld. = spectrum, Nutt. 210. San Francisco. —— scabra, Nutt. 209. Monterey. , Nutt. 211. Sta. Barbara. persona, Esch. = Oregona, Nutt. 211 dis. mesoleuca, var. 214. Acapulco. Haliotis Cracherodii, Leach. 183. Mon- terey. : rufescens, Swains. 182. Monterey. Trochus picoides, Gld. 203. “? Sta. Bar- bara.” Buschii, Phil. ? =inermis, Gmel. 115. Panama. ——, sp.ind. 216. Mazatlan. —— (Omphalius dentatus, Gmel.) 216 bis. Acapulco. This appears to be the com- mon small smooth W. Indian species ; probably imported. Panamensis, Phil. 217. Panama. reticulatus, Gld. =Omphalius viri- dulus, Gmel, =Byronianus, Gray. 219, Mazatlan, , 98. 230 Trochus Antonii, var. from kelp. mestus. 129. Sta. Barbara. ligatus, Gld. =filosus, Nutt. (closely resembles dolarius). 11. Monterey. dolarius. 10, Sta. Barbara. Norrisii, Sow. 120. Sta. Barbara. ater, Less. = gallina, Forbes. 116. Monterey. Turbo saxosus, Wood. 226. Panama. pustulatus, Gld. (may be tessellatus or saxosus, jun. Cum.) 46. Acapulco. squamigera, Rve. (Galapagos, Cum.) 218. Panama. Phasianella compta, Gld. 12,25. S.Barb. Nerita elegans (probably scabricosta,var.). 234, Panama. “Neritina harpeformis ;”’ probably a lap- sus for Columbella h. Taboga. Capulus. 213. Sta, Barbara, Hipponyx Grayanus, Mke. = radiatus, Gray. 205, Panama. —,sp.ind. 203. Taboga. 2 subrufa, Sow. (white, rubbed). 213. ?Sta. Barbara. Calyptrea regularis, C.B.Ad. =Galerus mammillaris, Brod. 148. Sta. Barbara. mammillaris, Brod. 215. Acapulco. . Sp.ind. ?— Crucibulum spinosum, Sow. (dead). 148 bis. Sta. Barbara. Jewettii, 150. Mazatlan. 2? imbricatum, Sow. 212. Acapulco. Crepidula excavata, Brod. 225. Sta, Barb. (like squama; apex gone), 151. Sta. Barbara. (2 hepatica =) onyx, Sow. Mazatlan [teste list, probably correct: Sta. Bar- bara, ticket]. rostriformis, Gld. = adunca, Sow. 149. Sta. Barbara. = incurva, Brod. 149. Sta 9. Sta. Barbara, Barbara. Turritella goniostoma, Val. 235. Panama. Modulus dorsuosus, Gld, =disculus, Phil. 47. Acapulco. catenulatus, Phil. 48. Acapulco. Narica ovoidea, Gld. =Isapis o,, H. and A. Ad. 17. Mazatlan. Lacuna. 47. Sta. Barbara. Litorina (?Lacuna) wunifasciata, Cpr. 23,172. Sta. Barbara. puncticulata, Phil. =conspersa, vay. 174. 2? Panama. ? pusillus, Phil. 50. Panama. planaxis, Nutt., Phil. = tenebrata, Nutt. 100. San Francisco. —— aspera, Phil. 173. Panama. Rissoina ambigua, Gld. 14, “ Valpai- reiso, Mex.” REPORT— 1856, Planaxis planicostata (called sulcata, Lam.). 53,58. Panama. Vertagus gemmatus, Hds. 55. ?— Cerithium maculosum, Kien. 153. Pan. (a pr. man. bene, postea San Francisco). Cerithidea sacrata, Gld. = Pirena Cali- fornica, Nutt. 102. San Francisco. Montagnei, D’Orb. 13. Panama. — solida, Gld. = valida, C. B. Ad. = varicosa, Sow. 68. Panama. Bittium (rubbed). 31. Sta. Barbara. Ovulum variabile, C.B.Ad. = Californi- cum, Mus. Cum. No.34 on kelp thrown up after storm. 32-34. Sta. Barbara. Erato scabriuscula, Gray. 26. ? Mazatlan. leucophea, Gld. [Mazatlan, Rev. — Steele.] 28, Sta. Barbara. ae . Comp. £. columbella, Mke. 27*, 30. 2 Mazatlan. 2 Jewettii, Cpr. 30. Sta. Barbara. Cyprea radians, Lam. 136, Panama. spadicea, Swains. 118. Sta. Barb. punctulata, Gray. 108. Panama. —— pustulata, Lam. 130. Panama. —— pediculus, Linn. (dead). 131. Aca- pulco [? imported]. Pacifica, Gray. 131*. Acapulco, suffusa, Gray. 132, Acapulco. — Californica, Gray. 133. Sta. Barb. sanguinea, Sow. 134, Panama. —— Solandri, Gray. 135. Panama. Cancellaria brevis, Sow. Acapulco. clavatula, Sow. 4. Taboga. Strombus granulatus, Sow. 47,70. Pan. Terebra, sp. ind. 17, Sta. Barbara. robusta, Hds. 119. Panama. Defrancia bella, Hds. 18, Sta. Barbara, on zoophytes. ? Mangelia. [Perhaps this is the Drilla albovallosa.| 223. Panama. Conus ravus, Gld. 5. Sta. Barbara. 160. Acapulco. —— comptus,Gld. =worn purpurascens, jun., teste Cuming. 121. Sta. Bard.[?] pusillus, Gld. 122. Mazatlan. (young, worn). 29, Sta. Barbara. Odostomia achates, Gld. =Obeliscus. 17. Mazatlan. gravida, Gld. 24. Sta. Barbara. Chemnitzia tenuicola, Gld. 19. Sta. Barb. torquata, Gld. 22. Sta. Barbara, Scalaria statuminata, Sow. (very fine). 240. Taboga. Scalaria (like venosa, W.I.). ? Panama. Natica Souleyetana, Recl. 166. Panama. maroccana, jun. 165. Panama. unifasciata (= maroccana, var.). 163. Panama. Haneti, Recl. 169, Panama. ——, sp. ind. (rubbed). 167, Panama. ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. Natica zonaria, Lam. (Acapulco, on the sands, Mus. Cum.) 167 pars. Panama. »sp.ind. 164. 2— — uber, Val.=300 +302, C.B.Ad. Pan. Shells, teste Gld. 168. 2?— Ficula decussata, Wood. 178. Taboga. Dolium ringens, Swains. 204. Panama. Voluta harpa, Barnes. 154. Mazatlan. Marginella sapotilla, Hds. 110. Panama. > sp.ind. 27. ? Mazatlan. Mitra lens, Wood, =foraminata, Swains. =Dupontii, Kien. 61,69. Panama. —— “auriculoides?” Probably = pica, Rye. 42. Panama. Fasciolaria bistriata, Cpr. 175. Panama. Leucozonia cingulata, Lam. 90. Panama. Triton, sp.ind. Taboga. constrictus, Gld. = Persona ridens, - Rve. (St. John’s, Hartweg.) 176. Acapulco. ? Ranella convoluta, Brod. 6. Taboga. nitida, Brod. 89. Panama. celata, Brod. 91. Panama. Oliva ? eburnea. 159. ? Panama. petiolita, Gld., ?=rufifasciata, teste Cum. 15. Sta. Barbara (dead). plumbea=testacea, Lam. 99. Pan. angulata, Wood. 107. Taboga. — biplicata, Sow. 157. Sta. Barbara. volutella, Lam. 158,161,162. Pan. Nassa luteostoma, Brod. 52. Panama. — versicolor, C. B. Ad. 117. Acapulco. complanata, Powys. 44. Panama. collaria, Gld. 49. Panama. ; corpulenta,C.B. Ad. 51. Panama. perpinguis, Hds. 114. Sta. Barbara. Tritonidea pagodus, Rve. 95. Panama. Purpura columellaris, Lam. 65. Acapulco. - emarginata, Desh.=Conradi, Nutt. 104. San Francisco. — “undata (2 bicostalis)”’=biserialis, Blainv. 238. Panama. , sp.ind. 104. ? Mazatlan. 231 Purpura sanguinolenta, Desh. = Pisania hemastoma, Gray. 224. Panama. kiosquiformis, Ducl. 105. Panama. septentrionalis (appears =lapillus, var.). 97. San Francisco (also Nutt.). - melones, Ducl. 106. Panama. Ricinula ? carbonaria. 67. Panama. Monoceros punctatum, Sow.=lapilloides, Conr. 101. San Francisco. brevidentatum, Brod. [?]. 103. San Francisco. unicarinatum. 101. San Francisco. Columbella gibberula, Sow. (on anchor). Sta. Barbara. gibberula, Sow. 16. Taboga. — carinata, Hds. 35. Sta. Barbara. — Gouldii, Cpr. 36, Sta. Barbara. Santa-Barbarensis,Cpr. 172. Sta. Barbara. bicanalifera, Sow. 38. Taboga. nigricans, Sow. 39, 40. Taboga. guttata, Sow. (Apr.man.=cribraria, Lam.) 43. Mazatlan. (worn). 49*. Acapulco. festiva, Rve. - 281. Acapulco, major, Sow. 54. Panama. 102. Mazatlan. — hemastoma, Sow. 57, 155. ? Pan. rugosa, and var. 221, Panama. harpeformis, Sow. Taboga. — ?parva, Sow. 96. ? Panama. maculosa, Sow. ?— Truncaria modesta, Pow. 152. Panama. 72. Sta. Barbara [?]. Engina ferruginosa. 41. [2 W. I. im- ported. ] i ead crocostoma, Rve. 67. Panama. [Galap. Cuming.] Concholepas Peruviana, Lam. 139. Pa- nama | surely imported]. Fusus, sp. ind. 175. Panama. Cyrtulus distortus, Gray. 75, Panama. Murex Nuttalli, Conr. 92, Panama [?]. Collected by Lieut. Green. Pholas ovoidea, Gld. 181. San Diego. Californica, Conr.=Janellii, Desh. 182. San Diego. penita, Conr. 184. San Diego. Platyodon cancellata, Conr. 162. San Diego. Osteodesma Californica, Conr. 192. San Diego. “ Anatina argentaria, Cour.=Periploma planiuscula, Sow.”’=Periploma Leana, teste Cuming. 27. Guaymas. Thracia granulosa, Gld.=plicata, Desh. 10. La Paz. Solen maximus, Wood=Nuttalli, Conr. 21. San Francisco. Solecurtus Californianus, Gld.=subteres, Conr. 188, 189. San Diego. “ Sanguinolaria miniata,”’ Gld. = pur- purea, Desh. 37. San Juan. Psammobia decora, Hds.=Sanguinolaria Nuttalli, Conr. 140. San Diego. Cumingia Californica, Conr. 171, 195, 196. San Diego. Semele decisa, Conr. 134. San Diego. flavicans, Gld.=S. proxima, B. M. Cat., not C. B. Ad. 191. San Diego. 232 Semele rubrolineata, Cony. = S. simplex, A. Ad. teste Cum.* 141. San Diego. Tellina [resembling Suénsoni, Moreh, Brazil, and T. ealearea). 142. San Diego. —— gemma, Gld. 198. San Juan. pura, Gld. 197. San Diego. . 57, Mazatlan. — secta, Conr. 139. San Diego. nasuta, Cony. 147. San Diego. vicina, C. B. Ad. 130. ? Mazatlan. , C. B. Ad. 188. Acapulco. regia, Hanl. 52. Mazatlan. Dona punctatostriatus, Hanl. 55. Ma- zatlan. carinatus, Hanl. 93. Mazatlan. Californicus, Conr. = levigatus, Desh. 159. San Diego. abruptus, Gld.=Californicus, Conr. var. 160. San Diego. — Californicus, Conr. var. 161, San Diego. —— , var. 199. San Juan. Mactra (Lutraria) nasuta, Gld. [?=fal- cata]. 49. ? Mazatlan; San Pedro. Californica, Conr. 100. ? Mazatlan. Lutraria ventricosa, Gld.=Mactra exo- leta, Gray. 50. ? Mazatlan. undulata, Gld. 9. La Paz. Gnathodon mendicus, Gla. = Rangia tri- gona, Petit. 95. ? Mazatlan. “Saxidomus Nuttalli, Conr. = Venerupis Petitii, Desh.” = Tapes maxima, Phil. . 156. Monterey. Sawicava carditoides, Conv. 2 Monterey. Cordieri, Desh.= Venus lamellifera, Conr. 107. Monterey. ——, sp. ind. ll. La Paz. pholadis (Desh., Guér. Mag. 1841, pl. 40). 29. San Diego. Petricola bulbosa, Gld.=robusta, Sow. 31. Guaymas. dactylus, Sow. (very rare). 11. La Paz. Venus, sp. ind. 124. ? Mazatlan. amathusia, Pbil. 83,59. Mazatlan. . 53. Mazatlan. - Columbiensis. 85,87. Guaymas. gnidia, Sow. 63. Mazatlan. straminea, Conr. 22. Guaymas. reticulata. 17. La Paz. — simillima, Sow. 172. San Diego. — Californiensis, Brod. (not Conr.), Mus. Cum. 146. San Diego. LOPE REPORT—1856. LO Venus Petitii, var.=straminea, var. teste Nutt. 185. San Diego. — Californicus, jun., Conr.=compta,: Mus. Cum. 171. San Diego. , = compta, Mus. Cum. 61. Mazatlan. flctifraga, Gla. =Nutialli, Comr- (non Desh.)+. 145. San Diego. Anomalocardia subrugosa, Sow. 58. Maz. Dione circinata(Mazatlan, Rev.—Steele). 73. 2? Mazatlan. — rosea. 62. Mazatlan. dione, Gld.=lupinaria, Less. 129. Ts. 3 Marias. biradiata, Gray=D. Chionea. 7. La Paz. Dosinia Dunkeri, Phil. 56. ?Mazatlan. gigantea, Sow. 19. La Paz. saccata,Gld.= Cyclinasubquadrata, Hanl. 99. Mazatlan. Trigona crassatelloides, Conr. 153. San Diego. —_—— . 94. Mazatlan. [2] corbicula, Gld. =radiata, Sow. 122. ? Mazatlan. Chama Pacifica, Gld.=C. frondosa, var. Mexicana. On Vermetus. 24. Guaym. exogyra, Conr. San Pedro. , with C. venosa. 150. San Diego. — pellucida. 176. San Diego. Cardita affinis, Gid. = Californica, Desh. 26. Guaymas. Cardium Panamense, Sow. 84. ?Maz. —— wanthocheilum, Gld.=luteolabrum, Gld. 132. San Diego. -— Nuttalli, Conr. = Californiense, Desh. 138. San Diego. substriatum, Conr. 158. San Diego. elatum, Sow. 194. San Diego. Diplodonta orbella, Gld. [do.Nutt.] 137, 138. San Diego. Lucina punctata, Linn. 16. La Paz. , Linn. 136. San Diego. Cyrena altilis, Gld.=Meaicana, var. TEE ? Mazatlan. Anodon ciconia, Gld. 48. ?Mexico. Mytilus, sp. ind. 47. San Francisco. Modiola, sp.ind. 20. San Francisco. — capaz, jun. 173. San Diego. , Conr., very large valve. 4. La Paz. Lithophagus falcatus, Gld. = Gruneri, Phil. 117. Monterey. * The locality given to S. simplex by Lieut. Belcher is “ China Seas;” but, as in the case of Dosinia simplea, is almost certainly erroneous. : + This is the /. callosa (quasi Conr.) of Deshayes. The specimen is marked “? Stutchburyi;” which is a closely allied species from the Pacific Islands, with differently shaped teeth, no posterior crenations, and displaying a few Cardium-like intercalations at the margin, ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. Lithophagus attenuatus, Desh. 180. San Diego. , sp. ind. 183. San Diego. Pectunculus giganteus, Rve. 32. Guaymas. -— assimilis, Sow. 86. ? Mazatlan. Avicula sterna, Gld. 60. ? Mazatlan. Meleagrina, sp. 80. ?Mazatlan. Perna flexuosa, Sow. = Chemnitziana, D’Orb. 81. Mazatlan. »== Chemnitziana. 103. La Paz. Pecten ? purpuratus = ventricosus, Sow., with Bivonia indentata. 144. ? San Diego. latiauritus, Conr. + monotimeris, . teste Nutt. 131. San Diego. nodosus. 3. La Paz. dentatus, Sow. 6. La Paz. Hinnites gigantea, Gray =H. Poulsoni, Conr. 1834. 149. San Diego. Spondylus “varians, Sow.” 1. La Paz. “pictorum, Chem.= crassisquama, Lam.” 2. La Paz. Ostrea Cumingiana, Dkr. 5. La Paz. palmula, Cpr. 147. San Diego. conchaphila, Cpr., 1°5 in. long ; very thin; (Oregon, San Diego, Nutt.), no tendency to crenations ; striped. 174. _ San Diego. Bulla nebulosa, Gld. 175. San Diego. Bulimus vegetus, Gld.=pallidior, Sow. San Juan. Helix tudiculata, Binney. 151. San Diego. Kellettii, Forbes. 152. San Diego. Melampus olivaceus, Cpr. 193. San Diego. Chiton articulatus, Br. 74. Mazatlan. Blainvillei, Br. 133. San Diego. Magdalenensis,Hds. 72. Mazatlan. Patella Mewicana, Lam. 67. Mazatlan. ——- discors, Phil. 125. Mazatlan. Acmea? 125. ? Mazatlan. gigantea=Kochii, Phil. 166. San Diego. pintadina, Gld.=verriculata, Rve. =patina, var. 66. Mazatlan [?]. ,==mesoleuca, Mke. 65. Ma- zatlan. , = leucophea, Nutt.= pelia, Esch, 75. Mazatlan [2]. —— , =fascicularis, Mke. 164, 177. San Inego. —— —? 167. San Diego. , =scabra, Nutt., var. 168,178. San Diego. — 5 =Oregona, var. Nutt. =per- f sona, Esch. 169. San Diego. — scabra, Gld. = spectrum, Nutt. 179. San Diego. 2? spectrum, var. [M ay be an arau- cana, D’Orb., imported from Valpa- raiso].; 64. Mazatlan [?]. 233 Acmea patina, var. cinis, Rve. 116. Mont, , var. tessellata, Nutt. 165. San Diego. ?Fissurella. 163. San Diego. virescens, Sow. 70. Mazatlan. volcano, Sow. 163. San Diego, Turbo fluctuosus, Wood= Fokkesii, Jonas. 148. San Diego. 120. Mazatlan. Trochus unguis, Wood =digitatus. 108, ? Mazatlan. —— filosus. 157. San Diego. dolarius. 115. Monterey. virgineus. 114. Monterey. — olivaceus, Wd. 92. ? Mazatlan. (A specimen, no. 388, marked ‘ Sandwich Is.’ must have been imported there.) Montereyi, Kien. = Pfeifferi, Phil. 113. Monterey. — (Omphalius) fuscescens, Phil. 123. 2? Mazatlan. (The O. Californicus, A. Ad., appears to be only a flattened var. of this shell.) “ qureotinctus, Fbs. = cateniferus, Pot.” 186. San Diego. — striatulus, Kien.=brunneus, Phil. Mus. Cum. 187. San Diego. -— pyriformis, Gld.=gallina, var. M. Cum. 155. San Diego. Nerita multijugis, Mke. = scabricosta, Lam. 118. Panama. Bernhardi, Recl. Guaymas. Neritina picta, Sow. 126. St. Michael. Calyptrea regularis, C. B. Ad.=Galerus mamillaris, Brod. 51. Mazatlan. Crucibulum spinosum, Sow. 190. S. Diego. Crepidula explanata, Gld. = exuviata, Nutt.=perforans, Val. 112. Monterey. Aletes squamigerus, Cpr. San Pedro. Modulus “? disculus, Phil.’’ (perhaps ca- tenulatus, Phil.). 82. Mazatlan. ° Cerithium irroratum, Gld.=stercusmus- carum, Val. 78. Mazatlan. Cerithidea fuscata, Gld.= sacrata, var. teste Nutt. San Diego. Potamis Hegewischii, Gld. = Cerithi- dea varicosa, var. Mazatlanica. 71. Mazatlan. Ovulum variabile, C. B. Ad. =Californi- cum, Mus. Cum. 36. San Juan. Cyprea radians, Lam. 68. Mazatlan. Cancellaria goniostoma, Sow, 56. Ma- zatlan. Strombus gracilior, Sow. 8. La Paz. Terebra arguta, Gld. = fulgurata, Phil. 35*. San Juan. Conus regularis, Sow. 23,25. Guaymas. princeps, Linn. 90. San Juan. , sp. ind. 33. Guaymas. ——,sp.ind. 35, Guaymas. 234 Solarium ? quadriceps, Hds. (dead). 106. Mazatlan. Natica patula, Sow. 77. Mazatlan. — maroccana=Pritchardi, Forbes. 96. ?Guaymas. Specimens exactly like, are in Mus. Cum. from Soe. Is. — bifasciata. 97. 2? Guaymas. Recluziana. 154. San Diego. Sigaretus debilis, Gld. 98. La Paz. Ficula ventricosa, Sow.—decussata. 121. 2 Mazatlan. Cassis coarctata (dead). 89. San Juan. Oniscia tuberculosa, Sow. 38. San Juan. Oliva porphyria, Lim. 14. La Paz. ?eburnea. 34. San Juan. —,sp.ind. 41. San Juan. — tergina, Ducl. 42, 43. San Juan. intorta. 44. San Juan. splendidula, Sow. 104. La Paz. REPORT—1856. Purpura patula, Linn. 40. La Pax (list). San Juan (ticket). emarginata. 12. La Pax. biserialis, Blamv. 101. La Paz. kiosquiformis, Ducl. 88. La Paz. ,sp.ind. 13. La Paz. Monoceros muricatum, Brod. ? St. Juan. tuberculatum, Gray. 39,91. S.Juan. Columbella (gibbosa =) strombiformis, Lam. 102. Mazatlan. Buccinum? 33*. San Juan. Fusus ambustus, Gld. [exactly resembles the Mediterranean sp.] 128. ? Mazatl. pallidus, Gray. 119. Guaymas. Pyrula patula, Br.& Sow. 69. Mazatlan. lignaria, Gray. 119. Guaymas. Murex bicolor, Val. 15. La Paz. brassica, Lam. 76. Mazatlan. —— plicatus, Sow. 109. ?San Juan. Collected by Major Rich. Pholas ovoidea, Gid. Upper Cal. Californica, Conr. Upper Cal. Sanguinolaria Nuttalli,Cour. San Pedro. Solecurtus subteres, Conr. Monterey. Tellina secta, Conr. Monterey. nasuta, Conr. Lower Cal. Cumingii, Sow. 2— Bodegensis, Hds. Monterey. Tellidora Burneti, Brod. Lower Cal. Cumingia Californica, Cour. Monterey. Lutraria? Lower Cal. Platyodon cancellata, Conr. Upper Cal. Saxidomus Nuttalli, Conr. ?— Saxicava carditoides, Conr. Lower Cal. lamellifera, Cony. Upper Cal. Petricola robusta, Sow. ?— Dosinia gigantea, Sow. Gulf Calif. Dione chionea, Mke. Lower Cal. rosea, Brod.=Jepida, Chen. Lower California. Trigona planulata, Sow. Lower Cal. crassatelloides, Conr. Lower Cal. corbicula, Gld. = radiata, Sow. Lower Calif. argentina, Sow. Upper California[? ]. Venus amathusia, Phil. Lower Cal. gnidia, Brod. Lower Cal. —— straminea, Conr. Lower Cal. — Californiensis, Brod., not Conr. Lower Cal. & San Pedro. Chama rugosa. Lower Cal. echinata. Lower Cal. Cardita affinis, Gld.=Californica, Desh. Lower Cal. Cardium Panamense, Sow. Lower Cal.‘ Californiense, Conr. Upper Cal. consors, Br. & Low. Lower Cal. Lucina ‘? bella (see tigrina).”” LowerCal. Californica, Lower Cal. Alasmodon falcata, Gid. Upper Cal. Mytilus Californianus, Conr. Upper Cal. glomeratus, Gld. San Francisco. Modiola flabellum, Gld. ?— divaricata, Gld.? =Crenella coarc- tata, Dkr. Upper Cal. [?] Lithophagus faleatus, Gld. Upper Cal. ?cinnamomea. ?— Arca grandis, Sow. Lower Cal. formosa. Lower Cal. — tuberculosa, Sow. Lower Cal. multicostata, Sow. Lower Cal. reversa, Gray=hemicardium, Koch. Lower Cal. (large rhomboid), probably grandis, var. Gulf Cal. Perna? Californica, Conr. Lower Cal. [?] Pecten ventricosus, Sow. Lower Cal. latiauritus, Cony. + monotimeris, Conr. Upper Cal. nodosus. Lower Cal. Lima tetrica, Gld. Lower Cal. Spondylus “‘ pictorum, Chem.” Lower Cal. Placunanomia macroschisma, Desh. Monterey. Bulla nebulosa, Gld. Lower Cal. Bulimus vesicalis, Gld. (probably young, Cuming). Lower Cal. excelsus, Gld. Lower Cal. Helix Californiensis, Lea. Upper Cal. Scurria mitra, Esch. & Less. Upper Cal. Fissurella virescens, Sow. Upper Cal. [?] crenulata, Sow. Monterey. Pomaulax undosus, Wood. Upper Cal. Trochus mestus. Lower Cal. filosus. Upper Cal. dolarius. Upper Cal. —— virgineus. Upper Cal. ON MOLLUSCA Of THE .WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA, 235 Trochus ater, Less. [?=] gallina Up. Cal. Trochiscus Norrisii, Sow. Upper Cal. Uvanilla olivacea, Wood. Lower Cal. Neritina picta, Sow. Lower Cal. Crucibulum spinosum, Sow. San Pedro, Lower Cal. tenue, Brod.=spinosum, var. Lower Cal. rude, Brod. Lower Cal. dentatum, Mke. Lower Cal. — imbricatum [? cujus|. ?— Calyptrea (like equestris), probably ce- _ pacea. Lower Cal. Galerus conicus, Brod. ?— - mammillaris, Brod. ?— Crepidula onyx, Sow. Lower Cal. excavata, Brod. Lower Cal. — aculeata (teste Gld.). Lower Cal. — (like) dilatata. Lower Cal. 2 squama. Lower Cal. Litorina planaxis, Nutt. Upper Cal. Planaxis planicostata. ?— Cyprea spadicea, Gray. Monterey. zonata, Gray = Sowerbyi, Rve. Lower Cal. arabicula. Lower Cal. Cancellaria obesa, Sow., ? =urceolata, Hds. La Paz. — solida, Sow. La Paz. cassidiformis, Sow. La Paz. candida, Sow. Gulf Cal. goniostoma, Sow. Gulf Cal, Strombus gracilior, Sow. Lower Cal. granulatus, Sow. Lower Cal. Terebra variegata, Gray. (Guaymas, Mus. Cum.) Lower Cal. Pleurotoma maculosa, Sow. Lower Cal. Conus trochulus, Rve. Upper Cal. interruptus, Brod. & Sow. Lower California. Solarium quadriceps, Hds. Lower Cal. Natica Chemnitz, Phil. Lower Cal. bifasciata. Lower Cal. Mitra lens, Wood. Lower Cal. imermis. ?— Cassis coarctata, Sow. Lower Cal. Leucozonia cingulata, Sow. Lower Cal. Ranella ventricosa, ?— Triton Chemnitzii, Gld. (lapsu) = sipho- natus, Rve. Lower Cal. Tritonidea pagodus, Rve. Lower Cal. Nassa luteostoma, Brod. Lower Cal. Oliva splendidula, Sow. Lower Cal. testacea, Lam. Lower Cal. —— biplicata, Sow. Lower Cal. volutella, Lam. Lower Cal. ?tigrina. Lower Cal. Columbella fuscata, Sow. ower Cal. coniformis. Lower Cal. Purpura columellaris, Lam. Lower Cal, biserialis, Blainv. Lower Cal. emarginata, Desh. Lower Cal. kiosquiformis, Ducl. ?— muricata, Gray. Lower Cal. Monoceros punctatum, Sow. Upper Cal. brevidentatum, Wood. ?— — cymatum, Sow. ?— erassilabrum, Sow. Upper Cal. [?] unicarinatum. ?— globulus, [?cujus|. 2?— Vitularia salebrosa, King=vitulina,Gray. Lower Cal. Murex bicolor, Val. Lower Cal. foliatus=pinniger, Brod. ?— 48. The first important contribution to the local fauna of the Gulf of California was made by Dr. Menke; who, having received from his friend M. Heinrich Melchers, of Bremen, a number of shells which he had himself collected at Mazatlan, proceeded to catalogue and describe them in the “ Zeitschrift fiir Malacozoologie,” Dec. 1847, pp. 177-191. Here, for the first time in the history of West N. American Mollusca, we have an attempt to present a complete geographical list, of known as well as supposed new species, collected in a particular district. For the example thus set, and for the record of the labours of M. Melchers, Dr. Menke deserves well of science; but it does not appear that his identification of species is always ‘sound ; nor is it in every case easy to make out his descriptions of new forms. The paper is entitled “ Verzeichniss einer Sendung von Conchylien von Mazatlan, mit einigen Kritischen Bemerkungen,” and contains notes on the following species :-— No. 1. Siphonaria lecanium, Phil. 2. Litorina aspera, Phil. 3. Turritella imbricata, [Mke. quasi] Lam.=T. tigrina, Kien. No. 4. Vermetus glomeratus, [Mke. quasi] (Rouss.), Linn. ?=Bivoniacontorta. 5. Natica iostoma, Mke. “ Resembles N. canrena.” ?=N.wmaroccana,var. 236 REPORT—1856. No. No. 6. Natica maroccana,Chemn.(Koch)= | 35. Calyptrea dentata, Mke. “=C. ru- N. Chemniizit, Pfr. gosa, Less. in Guér. Mag. non Desh. 7. Nerita multijugis, Mke.=N. scabri- =C. extinctorium, Sow. non Lam.” costa, Lam., teste Mke. postea. = Crucibulum imbricatum, var, 8. Turbo fluctuosus, Wood. B. M. Maz. Cat. p. 287. no. 343, 9. Solarium granulatum, [Mke. quasi] | 36. imbricata, Sow. Lam. 37. —— Lamarckii, Desh. (Australia). 10. Cerithium ocellatum, [Mke. quasi] | 38. Hipponyx australis, [Mke. quasi] Brug.=C. stercusmuscarum, Val. Lam.=H. serratus. 11. Buccinum sanguinolentum, Ducl.= | 39. Fissurella pica, Sow. Pollia kemastoma, Gray. 40. chlorotrema, Mke.=F. rugosa, 12; gemmulatum, Rye. non Lam. Sow. nec Kien.=Pisania gemmata. 41. humilis, Mke.=F. rugosa, var. 13, giloum, Mke. Appears to bean | 42. gemmata, Mke. 2=F. alba, jun. Anachis, possibly coronata. 43. Acmea mitella, Mke. 14. Terebra fulgurata, Phil. 44, Pecten adspersus, Sow. (Tumbez, 15. Purpura hemastoma, [Mke. quasi] Peru.) Lam.=P. biserialis, Blainv. var. 45. Avicula Atlantica, [Mke. quasi] Lam. 16. bicostalis, Rve.=P. biserialis, =A. sterna, Gld. Blainv. 46. Arca ? ovata, Rve. Wwe atromarginata, “Blainv., Desh. | 47. Mytilus = M. spatula, Mke. im Zeit. =P. cancellata, Kien.” (New f. Mal. 1848, p. 2. Possibly = Mo- Hebrides.) diola capaz, jun. 18. Columbella strombiformis, Lam. 48. Modiola=M. semilevis, Mke. in Zeit, 19 major, Sow. f. Mal. 1848, p. 5. 20 harpeformis, Sow. 49. Cardita afinis, |Mke. quasi] Sow.= 21. Murex brassica, Lam.=M. ducalis, C. Californica. Brod. 50. Cardium muricatum, [Mke. quasi] 22. Ficula decussata=Pyrula ventricosa, Linn. ?2=C. radula, Brod. & Sow. Sow. 51. procerum, Sow. 23. Conus achatinus, [Mke.quasi] Brug. | 52. Donax ? compressus, [Mke. quasi] =C. purpureus or regalitatis. Lam. ?=D. assimilis, Hanl. 24, Oliva tergina, Ducl. 53. Tellina cicercula, Phil. 25. - zonalis, Lam. 54. Cytherea corbicula[Mke. quasi] Lam, 26. Erato columbella, Mke. =Trigona radiata. 27. Cyprea arabicula, Lam. 55. argentina, Sow. 28 Sowerbyi, “ Rve.= C. zonata, | 56. semifulva, Mke. ?2= Trigona Gray, not Chemn.” radiata, var. 29 sanguinea, Gray. 57. ——chionea, Mke.=Dionesqualida, 30 Solandri, Gray. Sow. + biradiata, Gray. ? + D. ele- 31 pustulata, Lam. gans, Koch. 32. Crepidula costata, [Mke. quasi] Sow. | 58. Venus cancellata, [Mke. quasi] Linn, =C. aculeata, var. 2=Chione amathusia: but v. B. M. 33 hepatica, [Mke. quasi] Desh. Maz. Cat. p. 80. no. 113. =C.incurva, Brod.,not C. hepatica, | 59. Corbula ?ustulata, Rve. One rubbed C. B. Ad. valve. 34. uncata, Mke.=C. adunca, Sow. Of the 45 species here quoted from other authors, the following 15 do not belong to the fauna:—Nos. 3, 4, 9, 10, 15, 17, 23, 32, 37, 38, 45, 50, 52, 54, 58. It is fair to suppose, either that the writer has erred in his diagnoses, or that shells have been imported. In most cases, as very similar species really are found at Mazatlan, it is natural to adopt the former alternative. In other cases, as in nos. 20 and 44, the species inhabit the coast, but their presence at Mazatlan wants the confirmation of the Reigen collection. Of the shells intended by nos. 17, 28, 37, 46, 48, & 59, no information can be given. Of the entire 59 species, accepting the altered nomenclature, which would reduce the number to 55, 40 are certainly, and ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 237 five probably, members of the fauna: of the remaining ten, it is unsafe to hazard a conjecture. The above analysis has been attempted, partly in order to show the diffi- culties attendant upon all inquiries ofthis kind. Here is a collection made on a single spot by a competent gentleman*, and described by a concholo- gist of acknowledged superiority, the editor of one of the very few strictly Conchological Journals; and yet only 32 can be accepted in the state in which they are presented, the remaining 27 containing errors either of col- lection or of description. If such is the work of a master, the readers of this Report will accept with due caution the labours of a mere student. 49. But if there is so much doubt attaching to Menke’s first list, there is still more in the principal list which follows. In the Zeit. f. Mal. 1850, no. 11, Dr. Menke informs us that since his last paper, M. Melchers had again visited Mazatlan, and had investigated the shells of that region with great zeal and perseverance, and no little sacrifice of money. He returned to Bremen in the summer of 1849, and generously presented Dr. Menke with a selection in the autumn of 1850. So far all is extremely satisfactory; but he goes on to state that he received at the same time, from the same ship, a box obtained at Mazatlan by purchase. This fact invalidates the soundness of all that follows; except in those few instances in which we are informed that M. Melchers collected the shells himself. The following list there- fore must be received with great caution, except where the shells are con- firmed by other authority. Occasionally Dr. Menke gives particulars as to the number of individuals from which he describes; as when he tells us, p- 188, that, as he has had an opportunity of examining no fewer than eight specimens of Murex ambiguus, Rve., he can speak with authority as to its being distinct from M. nigritus, Phil. If he had examined the many hundreds in the Reigen collection, he would probably have come to a different conclusion. The second (mixed) list is as follows :— 1850, pp. 161-173. has not been found. ?=Bivonia 1. Bulla Adamsi, Mke. contorta, var. Ze nebulosa, Gld. 14. Vamass glomeratus,|Mke.q. |Rous. 3. —— (Tornatina) gracilis, [Mke. ?=Bivonia contorta, Cpr. quasi] A. Ad. = ?B. infrequens, | 15. Natica Récluziana, Desh. C, B. Ad. -| 16. glauca, [?] Humb.=N. patula, 4. Bulimus zebra, Desh. Sow. 5. Planorbis tenagophilus, [Mke. q.] | 17. maroccana, (Chemn.) Koch. D’Orb. =P. tumens, Cpr. 18. ovum, Mke. 6. Physa Peruviana, [Mke. q.] Gray, | 19. Neritina cassiculum, Sow. =Ph. aurantia, Cpr. 20. picta, Sow, 7. Litorina fasciata, Gray. 21. Nerita ornata, Sow. “ =N. multi- 8. aspera, Phil. jugis, Mke.” =N. scabriuscula, 9. —— modesta, [Mke. q.] Phil. ?= Lam. L. conspersa, Phil. var. 22. funiculata, Mke. = N. Bern= 10. Turritella tigrina, Kien. “=No. 3 hardi, Récl. of first list.” 23. Planazis acutus, Mke. =P. nigri- 11. goniostoma, Val. tella, Forbes. 12 Hookeri, [ Mke. q.] Rve. 24, obsoletus, Mke. =P. nigri- 13. Vermetus Panamensis, Rouss. The tella, var. figure quoted represents Le Ver- | 25. Turbo fluctuosus, Wood. met of Adanson. .The name | 26. Solarium granulatum,[Mke.q.]Lam. * As M. Melchers is quoted for a shell from Vera Cruz, on the Gulf of Mexico, Zeit. f. Mal. 1848, p. 3, it speaks much for his accuracy as a collector that no W. Indian species are quoted in ‘Menke’ s lists, except such as have analogues on the Pacific coast, for which they have probably been mistaken. 238 27. Euomphalus radiatus, Mke. =Tro- chus perspectiviunculus variega- tus, Chemn., ?=Torinia v. Lam. 28. Trochus (Calcar) olivaceus, Wood. 29. — Melchersi, Mke. 30. —— stellaris, [Mke. q.| Lam. 31. —— ? minutus, Chemn. 32. versicolor, Mke. 33. —— (Monodonta) catenulatus, Phil. 34, ligulatus, Mke. 35. —— glomus, [Mke. q.] Phil. 1850, pp. 177-190. 36. Scalaria crassilabris, Sow. 37. 38. Rissoa stricta, Mke. Cerithium (Potamides) Montagnet, D’Orb. 39. —— maculosum, Kien. 40. ocellatum, [Mke. q.| Brug.= C. stercusmuscarum, Val t 41. interruptum, Mke. 42, Buccinum gemmatum, Rye. “ =30 gemmulatum, first list, No. 12.” 43. —— pristis, Desh.=serratum, Dufr. 44, —— (Nassa) luteostoma, Kien. 45. Monoceros muricatus, Brod. 46 eingulatus, Lam. 47. Purpura patula, Lam. 48, —— consul, [Mke. q.] Lam. =P. biserialis, var. _ —— biserialis, Blainv. . — bicostalis, [Mke. q.?] Lam.= P. biserialis, var. 51. Cancellaria ovata, [Mke. q.] Sow. 2=C. urceolata, Hds. 52, cassidiformis, Sow. 53. —— goniostoma, Lam. 54, Dolium dentatum, Barnes, = Malea ringens, Swains. 55. —— crassilabre, (Mke.) Val. = M. ringens, var. =Cassis ringens, Swains., Cat. App. p. 4. 1822. =—Dolium dentatum, Barnes, Lye, N. Y. 1824. =Buccinum ringens, Wood, Suppl. 1828. =Dolium personatum, Mke. Syn. p- 62. 1830. An. —Malea latilabris, + crassilabris, Val. 1833. —Doliwm latilabre, Kien. 1835. =D. plicosum, Mke. Zeit. f. M. p- 138. 1845. =D. ringens, Rve. 1848. =Cadium dentatum + C. ringens, H. & A. Ad. Gen. i. 197. 56. Hope crenata,Gray,=H.Rivoliana, ess. 57. Cassis coarctata, Wood. Bligh 58. REPORT—1856. Cassis inflata, (Shaw) Rve.=C. gra- nosa, Lam. abbreviata, Lam. . Columbella harpeformis, Sow.=C. citharula, Ducl. fuscata, Sow. . — nasuta, Mke. . — fulva, Sow. Terpsichore, [Mke. q.] Sow. . Murex messorius, [Mke. q.| Sow. unidentatus, [Mke. q.] Sow. ternispina, [Mke. aa Lam. salebrosus, King. brassica, Lam. = M. ducalis, Brod , —— bicolor, Val.=M .erythrostoma, Swains. . —— lappa, Brod. _ — dubius, Sow. = M. aculeatus, Wood, not Lam. . — nigrita, Phil. . — ambiguus, Rye. =nigritus, vax. . Ranella nana, Sow. muriciformis, Brod. anceps, Lam.=R. pyramidalis, Brod. _ Tritonium nodosum, (Chemn.) Mke. 79. 80. =Triton Chemnitzii, Gray. —— lignarium, Brod. scalariforme, Brod. 1851, pp. 17-25. 81. Turbinella cestus, Brod. . Fasciolaria princeps, Sow. . Ficula decussata, Rve. . Pyrula patula, Brod. & Sow. subrostrata, Gray, = Fusus lapillus, Brod. & Sow. anomala, Rve. . Fusus rheuma, Mart.=F. torheuma, Desh. . Pleurotoma funiculata, Val. maculosa, Sow. incrassata, Sow. = P. Botte, Val. _ —— Melchersi, Mke. . Strombus galeatus, Swains. granulatus, Wood. lentiginosus, Linn. 95. —— gracilior, Sow. 96. Conus princeps, Linn. 97. regularis, Sow. 98 puncticulatus, Hwass. 99, omaria, Hwass. 100. Oliva porphyrea, Lam. 101 angulata, Lam. 102 Julieta, Ducl.=0O. Pantherina, Phil. 103. —— venulata, Lam. 104, —— Melchersi, Mke. ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 239 105. Oliva undatella, Lam. 123. Crepidula striolata,Mke.—=C.nivea, 10 anazore, Ducl. var. 107. tergina, Ducl. 124. ——Goreensis, Desh.?= C.nivea,var. 108. testacea, Lam. 125. Calyptrea (Trochatella) Lamarckii, [Mke. q.] Desh. 1851, pp. 33-38. 126. —— conica, Brod. 109. Ovula emarginata, Sow. 127. —— (Dyspotea) spinosa, Sow. 110. deflexa, Sow. 128. cepacea, Brod. 111. Cyprea Arabica, Linn. 129. Hipponyx foliaceus, [Mke. q.| Quoy 112. arabicula, Lam. & Gaim. 2=H. serratus. 113. —— (Trivia) pustulata, Lam. 130. Fissurella virescens, Sow. 114. —— sanguinea, Gray. 131. viminea, [Mke. q.] Rve. ?=F. 115. —— fusca, Gray. rugosa, var. é 116. subrostrata, Gray. 132. Patella Mexicana, Brod. & Sow. 117. Terebra variegata, Gray. 133. Acmea mutabilis, Mke. ? =fascicu- 118. armillata, [Mke. q.] Hinds. laris+-mesoleuca, pars. 119. luctuosa, Hinds. 134, fascicularis, Mke. 120. Mitra lens, Wood, = M. Duponitii, | 135. mesoleuca, Mke.=Patella dia- Kien. phana, Rve. not Nutt. 121. Crepidula contorta, [Mke. q.| Quoy | 136. Siphonaria denticulata, [Mke. q.] & Gaim. Quoy & Gaim. Probably S. /e- 122. —— costata, [Mke. q.] Sow. canium, var. 50. Among the many wasted opportunities of obtaining very valuable information on geographical distribution, must unfortunately be recorded the Surveying Voyages of the ‘ Herald’ and ‘ Pandora,’ by Capt. Kellett, R.N., C.B., and Lieut. Wood, R.N. The former of these gentlemen commanded the ‘ Starling’ during the Sulphur Expedition. Their zeal for science is shown not only by the large number of fine and valuable shells which they brought back, but especially by the extreme liberality with which they have presented them to public museums wherever they thought that they could be made useful. The shells were deposited in the Museum of Practical Geology in Jermyn Street, London, then presided over by Prof. E. Forbes. He writes that “they were chiefly collected on the coast of Southern Cali- fornia, from San Diego to Magdalena, and the shores of Mazatlan.” This is precisely the very district of all others on which we are in want of accurate information. San Diego belongs mainly to the Californian Province, Ma- zatlan to that of Panama; the question yet to be settled is, ? where and how do they separate. Here was an exploration in competent hands on the very terra incognita itself; and yet, alas! Prof. E. Forbes further states that_ ‘unfortunately the precise locality of many of the individual specimens had not been noted at the time; and a quantity of Polynesian shells mingled with them, have tended to render the value of the collection, as illustrative of distribution, less exact than it might have been.” Such information as was accessible at the time was embodied by Prof. E. Forbes in two com- munications to the Zoological Society, 1850; the first on the Land Shells, collected during the Expedition, Proc. pp. 53-56 ; the second on the Marine “Mollusca, pp. 270-274. The following abstract includes what may be sup- posed to relate to our present subject of inquiry. From Oregon, Helix Townsendiana, H. Nuttalliana, and H. Columbiana. Helix Pandore, Forbes, p. 55. pl. 9. f. 3,6. Sta, Barbara, as per box label: San Juan del Fuaco, teste Forbes. Kellettii, Fbs. p, 55. pl. 9. f.2a,4, Allied to H. Californiensis, Lea. Same locality. labyrinthus, var. sipunculata, p. 53. pl. 9. f.4 a,b. Panama. — vellicata, Forbes, p. 55. pl. 9. f. 1 a,b,c. 2? Panama.” —— aspersa, marked Sta. Barbara; probably imported, p. 53. 240 REPORT—1856, Bulimus nux, B. calvus, B. eschariferus, B. uwnifasciatus, and B. rugulosus, from Chatham Is., Gelepagos, p. 54. Also, from the same island, — Chemnitzioides, Forbes, p. 55. pl. 9. f. 64,0: and — Achatinellinus, Forbes, p. 56. pl. 9. f. 5a,b. (In text Achatellinus, err. typ.) — fimbriatus, Forbes, p. 56. pl. 9. f. 7 a,b. Box labeled Panama. alternatus, Panama, p. 54. Succinea cingulata, Forbes, p. 56. pl. 9. f. 8a, b, “said to come from Mazatlan.” “ Out of 307 species of shells collected by the voyagers, 217 are marine Gasteropoda, 1 is a Cephalopod, and 58 marine bivalves. The new species are all from the American shores. There are no products of deep-sea dredging. A few specimens of considerable interest were taken by the ‘Herald’ at Cape Krusenstern.” The following species are described by Prof. Forbes :— Page. Plate. Fig. 271 11 1a,b. Trochita spirata, Forbes. Massaniello, Gulf of California. 271 i 9 Trochus castaneus, Nutt. MS. Sta. Barbara, &c. Nuttall. 271 11 8a,8. (Monodonta) gallina, Forbes. ‘‘ Probably from the Ma- zatlan coast.” San Diego, Lieut. Green. Blo | fay: aureotinctus, Forbes. ‘‘ Withthe last.” San Diego, Lieut. Green.=T. cateniferus, Potiez, teste Gould. 272 11 1la,b. —— (Margarita) purpuratus, Forbes, “? W. coast of N. A.” O72 Al 104; 6; Hillii, Forbes. ‘2? .N.W. coast of N. A.” 272 11 -~=«~2a,b,¢. Natica Pritchardi, Forbes. Mazatlan, abundant.=N. Chemnitzit, Pfr. non Recl.=N. maroceana, var. teste Koch. 29 elon] Gaede 3 Planazis nigritella, Forbes. ‘ Straits of San Juan del Fuaco.” i =P. acuta+P. obsoleta, Mke. As this species is found in extreme profusion at Mazatlan, and was not found by Mr. Nuttall, it is in the highest degree improbable that it should occur in abundance so far north in Oregon. It was probably from San Juan in the Gulf of California. 273 11 12 Purpura analoga, Forbes. Probably from the Oregon district. 274 ows decemcostata, Midd., var. approaching P. Freycinetit, yaa fone fen planospira, columellaris, and Carolensis; ‘“ probably from the Galapagos.”’ The two latter oceur also at Mazatlan. 274° 9 10 Fusus Kelletui, Forbes. One sp. from the Californian coast. CE al te Ce Oregonensis. Californian coast. DiAr a salebrosus. Mazatlan. The types of the described species, «nd numerous most beautiful and interesting specimens have been presented to the British Museum, The remainder may be seen by students in the drawers of the Mus. Pract. Geol.: but the condition of the labels is not such that any dependence can be placed on them unless confirmed from other sources. In the only list that remains, it is said that there were the following shells from the Galapagos : 18. Eight species of small shells; 19. Nerita ; 20-22. Purpure ; 23-25. Buceina; 26. Arce; 27. Bulimus. Of the bulk of the collection, 95 species are known from other sources to occur at Mazatlan, and 35 species have been taken in other parts of the province between Mazatlan and Panama. Of the remainder, several are known to belong to Ecuador and Peru, and some, as Pomaulax undosus and Acmea Oregona, to the Cali- fornian coast. But so large a number, even of those placed with the Mazatlan shells, and perhaps obtained by commerce from that spot, are known to be inhabitants of the Pacific Islands and the East Indies, that a list of them would be entirely useless for our present object. Among the specimens collected by Messrs. Kellett and Wood during their voyage, which have been by them presented to the British Museum, have been observed the following species :— ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 241 Cardium Nuttalli. California. Fissurella ornata. Trigonia radiata, var. Hindsii. Haliotis Cracherodii, Leach. Modiola capax. “S. America.” [2] Purpura Carolensis. Is. Plata. Pinna rudis. Gulf of California. Murex foliatus. San Juan de Fuaco. 51. But the largest collection ever brought to Europe from one locality (with the single exception of Mr. Cuming’s stores) was made at Mazatlan during the years 1848-50 by a Belgian gentleman of the name of Frederick Reigen. He did not live to enjoy the fruits of his almost unparalleled labours; and after his death in 1850, the collection was sent for sale, partly to Messrs. F. de Lizardi and Co. at Liverpool, and partly to Havre. The Liverpool portion measured about 14 tons of 40 cubic feet each. It was - bought by Mr. G. Hulse, wholesale naturalist in Dale Street; but before it passed into his hands, it received such an examination as time allowed from Mr. F. Archer, in whose collection, and in that of the Royal Institution, the first unmixed fruits will be found. Unfortunately the geographical value of these selections is greatly injured by trusting to memory and loose tickets ; and the localities of the Institution specimens have simply been added from the monographs, as ‘Galapagos,’ ‘ Panama,’ ‘ St. Elena,’ &c. Mr. Hulse fortunately deposited the bulk of the collection under lock and key in a chamber by itself ; but to save room, he immediately disposed of most of the large shells, such as Spondylus calcifer, Patella Mexicana, Strombus galea, and the Pinne, to a publican near Manchester, where they may be seen in his “Museum.” Circumstances enabled me to make a searching examination of Mr. Hulse’s stores, and to form a geographical collection from their con- tents*. Finding that in a small manufacturing town this could not be made available for the purposes of science, I acceded to the request of Dr. Gray that it should be deposited in the British Museum; it being stipulated (1) that I should be allowed to arrange it in its permanent abode, where it should re- main intact as a separate collection; and (2) that a descriptive catalogue should be published of its contents. The duty of preparing this was en- trusted to me by Dr. Gray. The work is already written, and most of it printed. When completed, it will be found to contain descriptions of 222 _ new species; in addition to several which had been previously described from the same collection in the ‘ Proc. Zool. Soc.’ and other works. Numerous details are added on species already known, especially on the variations of growth, geographical range, frequency, and synonymy. Being desirous of making the permanent collection of the British Museum as complete as possible, and finding that the original stores were in danger of being dispersed, and so rendered useless for science, I obtained possession ‘of the remainder of the vast collection, and subjected it to a renewed and more rigid scrutiny. There will, therefore, be preserved in the B.M. drawers, ~ not only the type specimens of the described species; but what will perhaps _ be of more service to inland students, because less often accessible, large series illustrating particular species, and displaying both their normal and their abnor- mal variations. Thus, of Donax punctatostriatus will be found 192; of D. Conradi [+ culter, Hanl. + contusus, Rve. + Californicus, Desh.], 292 ; of Anomalocardia subrugosa, 130; of Venus gnidia, 59; of Anomia lampe, 97 ; of Neritina picta, 607 ; and of Aemea mesoleuca, 301 specimens ; every one of which exhibits an appreciable difference from its neighbours. ‘The latter * Of this collection, amounting then to 440 species, an account was laid before the British Association at Liverpool: v. Reports, 1854, p.107. The list was examined by Prof. Forbes, and much assistance obtained from his experience. That assistance was promised during the course of the present inquiry, and would have prevented many of the errors attendant on it; but within a week after he had written to recommend the transfer of the collection to the British Museum, he had passed to the scenes where human aid is no longer needed, and where human errors find no place. 1856. R 249 REPORT—1856. > 100i We series was obtained. by repeated processes of elimination, from the examina- tion of about 11,000 specimens. The whole number of shells passed under review probably exceeded 100,000. The following was found to be the most satisfactory plan for the determination of specific limits :—(1) to spread out the entire mass in somewhat of order before the view, in order that the gene- ral idea of the species (so to speak) might be received by the mind; (2) to examine the specimens one by one, in comparison with an ordinary shell selected as a standard, putting to one side all that for any cause attracted attention; (3) from the hundreds thus selected out of the thousands, or the scores out of the hundreds, to arrange series according to observed differences; (4) to subject these to a rigid scrutiny with each other and with neighbour- ing species; (5) to make a selection that should exhibit not extremes only, but intermediate grades ; and (6) to write the description while the result of the previous processes was fresh in the recollection. No observations, indeed, can compare for accuracy with those made on living animals in their native haunts; but the next best process is the examination of large num- bers of specimens, such as the almost exhaustive diligence of M. Reigen has placed at our disposal. The process may require considerable time and no small amount of patience; but results thus obtained are far more satisfactory than the plan too often followed, of picking out a few specimens of leading forms, which alone are available to naturalists for description. So marvelous indeed are the variations of growth thus traced to the same specific source, that we may well accept with doubt species that are constituted from very limited materials. This caution is by no means to be overlooked in using the very catalogue in question; as the only materials for a knowledge of the small species (which amount to no fewer than 314 out of 691) were the dirt obtained from the washings of the shells, which had most fortunately been sent “in the rough ;” and the fragments obtained in ransacking the backs of a few Spondyli, which were most obligingly placed at my disposal by R. D. Darbishire, Esq., of Manchester, who had succeeded in rescuing them from the publican’s “ museum.” * It would of course have been far more satisfactory, for the purposes of science, had the collection never passed through a dealer’s hands. The fortunate circumstance, however, of its size and value requiring a room to be emptied and kept locked for its custody, has prevented the chances of error which would otherwise--have crept in. No species are inserted in the catalogue but what were obtained from the boxes in this room, and from the large shells about the parasites of which there can be no mistake; except Ficula decussata, of which Mr. Hanley distinctly remembers the appearance of a very few specimens in the Havre collection. This, which, though com- paratively small, filled twenty-eight boxes, after lying some time in France without a purchaser, was in the main sent to London, and disposed of in lots at the auctions, mixed with other shells, and without any knowledge being communicated as to their history. They have been freely distributed as though from Panama ; and several of them appear in the British Museum, labelled ‘“ Australia, presented by — Metcalf, Esq.” Several freshwater shells, Cyrene and Ampullaria, are believed ‘to have come from this source; __ but there was no trace of them in the Liverpool collection. In general, the two sets so far agreed as to make it probable that the species were divided. Messrs. Lizardi received a list, in which the exact localities of all the shells * IT am under the greatest obligations to Mr, Darbishire for his valuable aid from the com- mencement of the work. We alone were admitted by Mr. Hulse into his secret chamber, filled with the unmixed spoils of the Mazatlan waters; nor should I have ventured to pursue this inquiry, which would have been conducted far better under his auspices, had not professional _ engagements entirely prevented his devoting the time necessary for such a purpose, io ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 243 were recorded; this invaluable document, however, was thrown to. one side as useless, and has not since been found. The best evidence of the authenticity of the collection is in the shells them- selves. These were, with very few exceptions, taken alive, and treated with evident care. Every single bivalve was separately wrapped up and ticketed ; the mouths of the univalves were papered to preserve the opercula; and in many of the smaller species the animal was not extracted. The absence, from so vast a collection, of attractive shells known to be found in neigh- bouring places, such as Oliva porphyria, Terebra variegata, Malea ringens, Cassis coarctata, Pectens and Pectunculi, generally seen in collections from “that coast,” shows that M. Reigen made little use even of the facilities of the coasting trade to extend his stores. Nor are there to be seen the Pacific Strombs, Cowries, Terebre, &c., some of which even Menke allows to appear in his catalogue. In one respect a town of limited trade is more favourably situated for scientific purposes than a port of extensive commerce. Singa- pore, the Sandwich Is., Acapulco, &c., to say nothing of places on our own coast, are well known to be “ hotbeds of spurious species.” But among the many myriads in the Liverpool collection, not a dozen individual shells were found which can fairly be set down as strangers. The principal of these are— ° Arca fusca (living), which is quoted from the West Indies, and may linger in the Gulf Seas ; or it may have come from the East Indies on a ship bottom. Conus arenatus. One very rubbed specimen ; probably from ballast. Crepidula Peruviana. Two worn specimens; probably from ballast. Fissurella Barbadensis. One young fresh sp.; probably brought over on a pebble. With regard to Lucina tigerrina and Mactra fragilis, of each of which one fresh specimen was sent papered and ticketed with nearly related shells, we have no right to deny their authenticity merely because they oppose our theories; as unexpected facts are continually making their appearance, to the confusion of the mere systematizer and the corresponding delight of searchers after truth. All shells of this class are included in the list, in order that persons may see the bad as well as the good, and judge of its authority accordingly. No attempt has been made (except with the small shells) to state the number of specimens, because of the abstractions which had pre- viously been made by purchasers; but the following notes will give a tole- rably correct idea of their comparative frequency, after these abstractions had been deducted. e.r. extremely rare; under a score. ¢. common; up to 400 or 500. v.7. very rare; under a hundred. a. abundant ; 600 or 700. r. rare; under two hundred. e.c. extremely common; 1000. n.c. not common; or e.a. extremely abundant; more than 1000. n.U. Not uncommon ; } onder eee ; List of the Reigen Collection of Mazatlan Mollusca. Name. Freq. Other Localities. Class BRYOZOA. Membraniporide. Membranipora denticulata, Bush, 0.8. ....c.000| Ye Gothica, Rylands, MS., n.8.....00...s0000: r. |? Persian Gulf. Lepralia atrofusca, Rylands, MS., n. 8. ..-...... Yr. —— trispinosa, Johns?. ...... Reacasdccosncesnscess lsp. |Britain. —— Mazatlanica, Busk, n.s. ; meal ke —— rostrata, Bush, 0.8. .cccssssscsevees Other Localities. Fossil tertiary, Vienna. Chiloe, 96 fms., Darwin. 244 REPORT—1856. No. Name, Freq: 7 |Lepralia marginipora, Rewss ........ceseceeseeees] Te 8 |—— hippocrepis, Bush, n.s........ foueieekasas «cel hats 9 humilis, Busk, n.s. ......+ mecants ce eseyee iT. 10 FMI Busk wo... Rmeseatkass de ods x coos] De Ue 677 |——, sp. ind. atkals eaneniese ¢ Rvasecas SaeE Tae VAD ‘Coleeds 11 |Cellepora papilleeformis, Bush, n.s. .......c0006{ Te 12 |—— cyclostoma, Bush, n.s........ eedgetenshre T. 678 |Cellepora, sp. ind. , resembling pumicosa, Linn| v. Yr. Discoporide. 13 |Defrancia intricata, Bush, n. s. Sercdesacenrel asks B/D A UDRMNOMA GHD. INU 55ciiscdschohsasceokssop -nsaeeses) . Vols 14 Class TUNICATA. Unknown. Cl. Gee a ee Discina Cumingii, Brod.....0....s00..seseseeeeeeee] Te |Payta and St. Elena; Panama. Class AMET L ER ARGHI ATE. Pholadide. Pholadidea melanura, Sow........ Secdesseaveeseses| €.1. |Monte Christi. PICHIEER;USOWs, eseesscasetooenes uOt shoaeacas --.| 2sp. |Veragua. Parapholas calva, Gray, MS...........05 seseoeese{ TU. |Panama. acuminata, Sow......sesecceees spotbeeeseent ..| n.u. |Panama. Martesia intercalata, n.s. ....... Ranastenecoeeenes 2 sp. (Fragment) somewhat resembling Panopeea. 1 Perhaps Corbula tenuis. Gastrochenide. Gastrochzena truncata, Sow. .......sssecseeseeee4] TU. |Panama, West Indies. OvAtA, SOW.....sssssserstecsceeecessescesseeeee| Ve I. |Pan., Is, Perico, West Indies. Saxicavide. Saxicava arctica, Linn. ........ ee sieass cieeceorts v.r. |ubiquitous, p. 17; Fossil, Crag. Petricolide. Petricola robusta, Sow. . ssecceseessssecseeeee] DeU. |Panama, Island of Muerte, =P. bulbosa, Gld. =r sinuosa, Conr. ?=Choristodon typicum, Jonas ....... padepede|seeeeoine .|West Indies. —— ventricosa, Desh. .........000. desceasetiaces e.v. |Gulf of California. 2?=P. denticulata, SOW. orcscccesecescoscasceses|sceeeeess/POTU, PSP HUNG sh scans -ave edalpnetterse at puanasesadse = Rupellaria lingua-felis, n.$..........csesceeeseeeee ver EXar ala, Nias cdtrseeek ioecandeacces Anos hatesed siSDANG casera ka swaeees vias pian di ?Naranio scobina, 0. 8. ....e.....eeees 7 SP Ind. ..0.%- suereabaveeseecssessel Myla, ?Mya, sp. ind. . Routnepcceteserancienccaneeese eed. Corbulide. ; Corbula bicarinata, Sow, “2 ae Ses eee e.r, |Pan., R. Lejos, Carac., St.Elena. ?=C. alba, Phil. biradiata, Sow. .......645 at rer aera 1 |Panama, Chiriqui, Caraccas. —— pustulosa, n.s. ...... TEES eer 2 |Panama, St. Blas, 33 fms, ———- OVE AUATOSTUL eae ch cohen sescescscedec sence 1 |Panama, Xipix., Montijo, Carac. ——-, sp. ind. a. (allied to C. scaphoides, Hds.)} 2 ———, Sp. ind. B. .3,s.000¢ Sagnenert apneeneaagnees voy} Spheenia fragilis, 0. S.....00...e,0008 Lesaneccazeases| MeOnUs i Brice wees was Ac BES sepanverwels ak F emoomgi Ao WD lssernaprasman@atkarseastedeccnccres ete ] ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. Name. Pandoride. Tyleria fragilis, H. & A. Ad. ..,.00..ec0eess eee Lyonsia picta, Sow.......... JSoodhtaes Soecsede vows Solecurtide. Solecurtus affinis, C. B, Ad. ...... —— politus, n.s. ——, sp. ind. ......... Tellinide. Semele flavescens, Gid. ..... Aneaakeoddae Cau pOKIEE =8. proxima, [quasi] C. B. Ad. 4) |—— ?venusta, 4. dd. ...... aoranoe eocaocogoht ke 42 |Cumingia lamellosa, Sow. ......cescceseessenenens 424|——_ y PVAL. COATCHATA...ceseeecseseee Urreceas 43 |—— trigonularis, Sow. .....-sssssseeseees easeens 44 |\—— Californica, Conr. ..........00« Pra Gece 45 |——, sp. ind. (like C. striata) ............ dsrincs 46 |Sanguinolaria miniata, Gld. ......ccecesssseeeees =8S. purpurea, Desh. Tellina rufescens, Chem. ...cercscccccscreseneees = T. operculata, Gmel. — Broderipii, Desh. . —— ??Mazatlanica, Desh.... —— Dombei, Hanl. ........:.....000s Roaeinasetirs —— felix, Hanl.......... aed in aec tos dv ave hn cine os —— straminea, Desh. — donacilla, n.s. » SPs NG. (C) ccc... cemres ’ punicea, Born. ........+ orcee = Donax Martinicensis, Lam. teste Gray. = Tellina alternata, Sow. teste Gray. =T. angulosa, Gmel. teste Desh. =T. simulans, C. B. Ad. — Cumingii, Haml............ fg icdcon: oe —— Peburnea, Hanl.............65 Renprcoosbistaey P—— regularis, N.S. .cccccsesiscscsseececeseccoes —— lamellata, 1. S...seecescssesceesrese Seotse=tos —— ??puella, C. B. Ad. —— ?? delicatula, Desh. eS reaatositis Deghe. cies iodusisoece eeceneseass Pdenticulata, Desh. ......cecseessseee Pabece ——, sp. ind. (a) ——, sp. ind. (6) .....eeseeeee Fan Maceences waaee Tellidora Burneti, Brod. 8 Sow. seecsccsssevee = Lueina eristata, Récl. Strigilla carnaria, Linn. .....sscccesreseseeeeeeveee =Lucina carnaria, Lam. = Strigilla miniata, Gld.=S. fucata, Gld. =—— lenticula, Pil. ...0.0.ccesesscccssesercsseses 2?Psammabia, Sp. ind....sccscecseseesecscrscsseenss eeeee eveseecens Cee me rerese eas eeeenseeerse® eenee eee etoueeee Pee eernaseeetenes Come ee eee ssesee eereseves Donacide. Tphigenia altior, Sow......cssscesessscsscesseeesens leevigata, ? ......... ReSanendsseshenes sees aces Donax carinatus, Hanl. ........sseeccscocseseerees —— rostratus, C. B. Ad. ...... =D. carinatus, var. Hanl. =D. culminatus, Cat. Prov. transversus, SOW. ..cccscecseccsrccessscseees 74 |—— assimilis, Hanl. ......cecccscocecscecscseececs Other Localities, 245 Is. Muerte, Vancouver’s Island. Panama. San Diego. W. Columbia. ?Panama, Payta. Panama, Caraccas. Panama, St. Elena. Monterey, &c. San Juan. Tumbez, West Indies. Panama. Panama. Pan., Guayaquil, W. I., Xipix. Panama, Guacomayo. Tumbez. Panama. Central America. Salango, St. Elena. W. I., ? Medit., Sta. Barbara. Gulf Nicoya, Tumbez, Panama. San Blas, Tumaco. Sta. Barbara, Panama. 246 REPORT—1856. No. Name. Freq. Other Localities. 75 |\Donax punctatostriatus, Hanl. ......ccereeseeees| Ce Ce 75b|—— ?punctatostriatus, var. czlatus........ Sexe|| veld 76 |\—— Conradi, Desh. sc... cqcoscdssesenyecssosos ..| © |Acapulco. +D. culter, Hanl. +D. Californicus, Desh. non Conr. +D. contusus, Rye. ?+ D. radiata, Val. —— navicula, Hanl. ...ccccsccerssscorcsceseseaces Mactride. Mactra exoleta, Gray........s.ssceeeeeeeeseeeneees] De Ue |Panama, Guayaquil. =Lutraria ventricosa, Gld. = Mulinia ventricosa, C. B. Ad. —— fragilis, Chemmn. ...cssseesesrersceees vaxensues = WM. ovalina, Lam. teste Gray. = M. Braziliana, Lam. teste Desh. = M. oblonga, Say, teste Rve. —— (Mulinia) angulata, Gray.......... seeeones ?=M. donaciformis, C. B. Ad. Gnathodon mendicus, Gld. .secccccecssveeeveees = Rangia trigona, Petit. n.u. |Gulf of Nicoya, Panama. 1 |West Indies. 80 e.r. |S.W. Mexico, Panama. 81 Venerida. ?Clementia gracillima, N.S. .ssccsesecescsseeeees Trigona radiata, SOW. ......s-ssecesseesseseee paaces = Venus Solangensis, D’Orb. = Trigona Byronensis, Gray. = Cytherea corbicula, Mke. (non Lam.) +C. semifulva, Mke. +C. gracilior, Sow. +. Hindsii, Hanl. ?+(C. intermedia, Sow. ———= humilis, Te S. .eeresecccsesscccsccscvccgcsnonce 82 83 eT. y.c. |Salango, Xipix., Guayaq., Pan. 84° 85° y.r. |Gulf of Nicoya. 86 .|—— 2? crassatelloides, jun...... metaecesseectes ...|2 valy. |Upper California. 87 |—— planulata, Brod. & Sow. ....0....se0eeee-| eC. |Pan., Salango: Chili, Coquimbo, + Cytherea undulata, Sow. D' Orb, =Donax Lessoni, Desh. = Cytherea mactroides, Lam. teste Desh. 88 |Dosinia ponderosa, Gray ..s.csccseeserreeeeceees 1 |Payta. = Cytherea gigantea, Phil. = Venus cycloides, D’Orb. 89 |\—— Anne, Dard. ....0+.... on ren Basa yacns cesses iu Vale 90 |—— Dunkeri, Phil. ..... edtodsseatressrcecnscoas y.c. |Panama, St. Elena, “ Eastern = Artemis simplex, Hanl. Seas,” dd. & Rve. = Cytherea Pacifica, Trosch. 91 |Cyclina subquadrata, Hanl. ......sccee-| 3 |St. Hlena, Panama. = Artemis saccata, Gld. Mone aurantia, HAN. ccccersecccccceusvksegeracaen = Cytherea aurantiaca, Sow. —— chionea, Mike. .......+. qoecakvocke see os ease + Cytherea squalida, Sow. i +C. biradiata, Gray. 92 93 n.c, |S.W.Mex.,Gulf Nicoya, Taboga. c. |San Blas, 8S. W. Mexico, La Paz, Taboga, St.Elena, ?Philip- pines, Swan River, ?+C, elegans, Koch. 94 rosea, Brod. & Sow. .ss.secsseseceseeeeeeee} Ce |San Blas, Panama. = Cytherea lepida, Chen. 95 |—— lupinaria, Less. ....seeesssssevsessseeeseeses] @6Ce (San Blas, Salango, Tumbez, =D. lupanaria, Gray. Payta. = Cytherea Dione, var. Brod. = C. semilamellosa, Gaud. —— ? vulnerata, Brod. sssseresscorscecssveeecesee} 2 [Real Llejos. ual. 100 101 102 103 104 |105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 687 Dione brevispinosa, Sow. circinata, Born. ........++ po schaxe ret Name. Venus Guineensis, Gmel. Cytherea alternata, Brod. eee e een eeeeeesene ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST.COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. eeeeeee sereree ———— CONCINIA, SOW. sereeersscsecceerecrrereneeees ?-++ Cytherea affinis, Brod. ?+C. tortuosa, Brod. Cytherea petechialis, Lam.......s++..seseees Arecos Venus (Chione) gnidia, Brod. & Sow. ......+.. e. e —— amathusia, Phil. = Chione gnidia, var. Desh. , Sp. ind. (a) feneeee —— —— distans, Phil........veceeseecosccccecers ——— —— crenifera, Sow. ..+,...-seeeseseeeeeeees =V. Portesiana, D’Orb. Tapes histrionica, Brod. & Sow. —— Columbiensis, Sow. ... , Sp. ind. (4) = Chione histrionica, Desh. grata, Say = Venus tricolor, Sow. teste Desh. =V. discors, Sow. teste Jay. ?= Anomalocardia subrugosa, Sow. V. neglecta, Phil. (non Gray). squamosa, 0. Ss. = Cytherea subsulcata, Mke. —— subimbricata, Sow........ dpcsebacencnmns see Circe margarita, 0.8. ....sesscecseeerecneeneeneees ver. Astartide. Pundatella, Sow......seessseeeee eee b erases tepeeseres Preeeee Tre Teer rere er eereerery eeenee stoners teeeeee —— subtrigona, D. S.....sceeeeesecesececeenesevens Gouldia Pacifica, C. B. Ad........c.sccseeeeceeeres varians, 0. Ss. eee eter eseneeseessesseees Cardita Californica, Desh. ....0...csseceseeseeseee =C. affinis, Mke. non Sow. Venericardia, sp. ind..........seseeeeeeseers Trapezium, sp. Ind..........ceesesecseesseses Chama frondosa, var. Mexicana Chamide. +Chama echinata, fig. pars. 1214;—— ?=C. Buddiana, C. B. Ad. ?frondosa, var. fornicata ...+e....+- eeeeeee SPINOSA, SOW. ......cescseceeecescenscecessees —— EXOQyra, CONT. .....secereeeee Penaceccsccevar Cardiade. Cardium (Levicardium) elatum, Sow. ......... procerum, Sow. ......++++ wasacgasacsessenncs ?+C. laticostatum, Sow. —— Psenticosum, Sow.........sseeceeseees =C. rastrum, Rve. ?=C. muricatum, Mke. , 8p. ind. (a) (like C. punctulatum) ’ (2) (like C. triangulatum) .. + —— (ce) (like C. pseudofossile) .. Seeeees seneee eeeteee —— alabastrum, 1.5. ssssscscscessecseeeesenee® —— rotundatum, 1. S. .sesseeseoes 247 Other Localities. West Indies, Monte Christi. Panama. Japan. Payta, Panama, San Blas, S.W. Mexico, Panama. Panama. St. Elena, Payta. Island 3 Marias, G. of Calif. St. Elena, S.W. Mexico. Real Llejos, St. Elena. S.W. Mex., Pan., St. Elena and Guacomayo, Puerto Portrero, Guaymas. S.W. Mexico, Panama, Peru. Acapulco, Puerto Portrero. Panama. Gulf of Tehuantepec. Lord Hood’s Island. San Diego. . |Guaymas, San Diego. S.W. Mexico, Panama, Payta, Real Llejos. Taboga, St. Elena. 248 REPORT—1856, - No. Name. Freq. Other Localities. 134 |Cardium graniferum, Brod. §& Sow. .........+0 e.r. |Pan., Gulf Nicoya and Xipix. 135 |-——, sp. ind. (g), (lucinoides, nom. prov.) ... Lucinide. 136 |Lucina (Codakia) tigerina, Linn. ws... = 137 2? PUNCtAatA, UNI. cvees-s.cccvessecceeeees 138 annulata, Rve....... * Shoeeeece epee Seoese 139 |—— ? muricata, Chemn. ....ecceseeeseceeee hate 140 CECHVAUAs Me Susromescccctsetcees Riahitatoets vecdees 141 |——,, sp. ind. (@) wicseesccseeceecseeeeeens Beetle 142 | —— pectinata, 1.5. ..sscscoeccssessesceececoeees 143 Caticellaris, PAtl. wee. qiseetecses Meslewiele cee 144 |—— Mazatlanica, 0.8. cecsesssseseneceees eoaadec 145 |—— prolongata, N. S.ce..-.ssssseercsvcesceeeerees LAG 0) ———— ROD annI (0) vscavesteeaiuecaveesccsssssoscsesdes 147-|=—~ ? eburnea, Rue. “ss... .s0ssseoees Raeea'lsleWelews 148 |—— sp. ind. (c)........c.006 saveon ose cstneie ba LAD HORI Mb LIA SPW aseane sensors at's doses vsweese eee 150 |Diplodonta semiaspera ......seccsseeecseeeeeerens ?= Lucina celata, Rve. ?=J. semireticulata, D’Orb. Comp. L. orbella, Gld. .......s0000 Sovaassdeeh 1502; —— y VAT. GISCTEPANS..+....ccsceeecese eecees 151 |———~ obliqua, Phil........... SEE ORCDROSEE =ponuELS 152 |?—— serricata, Rve. ...cecccscsscscsecseveaceecees Kelliade. 153 |Kellia suborbicularis, Mont. ........+.. radocs oon L54 i asea'? TUDLA MOM aesresdsssvarsetivessates sesce ~}155 |—— trigonalis, n.s. .........008 seapaveeseassenes 156 |}? —— oblonga, 1. S......scceeeeeesenee paisa tena 688 SSP-and. coven gailepperes 6 Gaviiiseiais'a's sevens 157 |Lepton Clementinum, n.s........ sadusseseveesenes 158 Dionzeum, n. S. sesseceseees Sab daaeoce ae 9) |-————-) WMNOMAMIIN NGS; lexeessesteurieceescreestace NGO |Pythina sUbleevissisi8. Uenshessdsocscecsescesoncssn 161 |Montacuta elliptica, 0.8. ...secssccseseeesseecsss 162 |? SUbqUAdrata, 1.8. .ss.sserecserceseceeeeees 163 |——, sp. ind. ...... GyesdiseapenvenesWeavassasciersec Cycladide. 164 |Cyrena olivacea, 1.8. .scseeeesseseseaseess teaseraes = C. Fontainei, Desh. non D’Orb. 165 |—— Mexicana, Brod. & Sow. ...cccssesereveese Comp. C. Floridana, Cony. Var.=C. altilis, Gld. Unionide. 166 |Anodon ciconia, GId. .....cccscseseeeseecserevasens Comp. 4. glauca, Val. Mytilide. 167 |Mytilus palliopunctatus, Dkr. ......secseesssees 168 |—— miultiformis, 0.8. ......ccccesccessceeseueess 169 |Septifer Cumingianus, Reel. ..... Suetdeeaede canes 170 |Modiola capax, Conr...... bp svewetece Senssessdesens 171 |—— Braziliensis, Chemn....,...... Macedeceocsecs =M. Guyanensis, Lam. = M. semifusca, Sow. (not Lam.) 171) , var. mutabilis .......... pertuneseudecs 172 |Crenella coarctata, Diri...s.ccessoccsssesssveecens 173 |Lithophagus attenuatus, Desh. ......... sestevees 1 1 |S.W. Mexico, West Indies. 2 |Panama. 1 |Panama, St. Elena. y.r. |West Indies. ... |San Diego. Atlantic: Britain, — Canaries : Fossil Crag ; Panama. e.r. |Atlantic: ? ubiquitous. eat. m0 CO HR DO DD ee n.u. ce. |S.W. Mexico. e.r. |Panama. r. |S. Diego, La Paz, Gal., S.W.Mex. r. |Guiana, Venezuela, Bay Guaya- quil, Panama. n.c. |? New Zealand. e.r. |Galapagos. e.r. |Peru, ?Chili. ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 249 No. Name. Freq. Other Localities, 174 |Lithophagus calyculatus, n.8......cssceeceseness 1 175 |—— plumula, Ham. ......cecscccsscvescseseceeees r. |Panama. 176 |—— aristatus, Sol. ........ccsccscsssoveccesecsenece c. |Senegal, West Indies. = Modiola caudigera, Lam. = Mytilus ropan, Desh. 176b|—— ——, var. pracilior .....s....cce0ees saaericap Bye 176 cl _—— ——, var. tumidior ........scsseeees ieee er. - : auritius, Philippines, Cuba, 177 |—— cinnamomeus, Chemn. ........c0serceaceees 1 { Venezuela, Central America, 178 |Leiosolenus spatiosus, . S.......sessesceeceeseeess e. r. 179 |——-, sp. ind. ...... peeatioans weiss aslcettecuents anon iies Arcade. 180 Arca grandis, Brod. & Sow. ..... Sp Spee apoacecoce v.c. |Pan., Real Llejos, Bay Guayaq. 181 |—— multicostata, Sow...... npcondundsnendeneonone 2 |Gulf "Tehuantepec. 182 |—— Plabiata, Sow. ....ccc.escscscesecceces veoves| 2 ~. |Real Llejos, Tumbez, W. Indies. ?= A. labiosa, Sow. ?= A. incongrua, Say. 183 |—— bifrons, n.s. ......... SRO ROCEBCULECE | Or 184 |—— tuberculosa, Sow. .......ssseecseee seoveseoee] VeC. |Panama, Real Llejos. ?-+.A. trapezia, Desh. +4. similis, C. B. Ad. 185 |—— reversa, Gray......cccsccscseeeeees sveseseseee| 2 |Panama, Tumbez. =A. hemicardium, Koch. 186 |—— ? brevifrons, Sow. ......... eaaeeiseeits aust 1 |Tumbez. 187 |—— emarginata, Sow. ...cccsscsececoccsscesceees e.r. |Atacamas, RI. Llej., Xipix., Pan. 188 |——, Sp. ind. ()......coccescscseccscesesvenes “reeA| ee 689 |—, (ibertesocene ee eters | Scoctioneabonec 1 189 |Byssoarca Pacifica, WSOIDE, Sta neencees cewsvenseeents r. |St. Elena, Bijooga Island. 190 |—— mutabilis, Sow. ......ccecccecececececscvecees r. {Island of Plata, Panama. Comp. Arca Americana, D’Orb.= imbricata, Brug. 191 fusca, Brug. ....00.8. Rualudesieedsessuseetacers 1~ |East and West Indies. 192 |—— vespertilio, n. S..rccccccececcscecesccceccseses 1 BOS) |\ "Ml Ota, SOW. esc secs cesvvaccececevecsevecevees e.r. |Gulf Nicoya. Comp. A. Tabogensis, C. B. Ad 194 |—— gradata, Brod. & Sow. ....cccssceseseuscoes v.r. |St. Elena, Taboga, West Indies, ?=4.squamosa,Lam. =.4.Domingensis, Lam, and Fossil. = Arca clathrata, Deft. Comp. B. divaricata, Sow. Comp. B. pusilla, Sow. Comp. 4. donaciformis, Rve. 195 | —— solida, Sow. ...ceccsessees tsesvoccecseseseeee] DU. |Panama, Payta. 196 |Pectunculus inzequalis, Sow. (non Gray) ...... 3 |Panama, Real Llejos, Puerto =P. pectiniformis, Wood (non Lam. Portrero, Guayaquil. ?+P. assimilis, Sow. 197 |—— ? multicostatus, Sow.,......sssseseseeeseeese| 1 (Ecuador, Guayaquil. Nuculide. 198 |Nucula exigua, Sow. ....sscssssessseseereseeee| 1 |Panama, Bay of Caraccas. 199 |Leda Elenensis, Sow. ....... svdasduemiddddsetesndar 2. |Panama, St. Elena. Aviculide. 200 |Pinna maura, Sow. ....s..eccssessceeeees seceesseees| COMM. |Panama. 201 |—— lanceolata, Sow.... teesevececscveesess| MN. U. |Puerto Portrero. 202 |—— ? rugosa, Sow........000 eedecceeaes etesatadtens v.r. |Panama. 203 itvicula sterna, Gid. seeccosccccectecesscesvese| De U. |Panama. =A. Atlantica, Mke.. 204 |Margaritiphora Mazatlanica, Hani. .........008| Ve Ie =A. fimbriata, Dkr. Isognomon Chemnitzianum, ae Ore catveceenses = Perna flexuosa, Sow. n.u. /Panama, W. Indies, Conchagua. 250 REPORT—1856. No. Name. Freq. 206 |Isognomon Janus, N.S. «..secsessssepecesseerevers er Pectinide. 207 |Pecten circularis, Sow. ....seceeseee qocvsseuseeves 2 690 |——, sp. ind. (a) ...sereeees eaaduess Fesceassesapns e. ¥. 691 =F Sp. ind. (2) steeee POCO E SHES ede eeEeerebsees 1 Spondylide. 208 |Spondylus calcifer, n.s......s0++e0 -EPRECEROTEE nu. = 8S. Lamarckii, Hanl. MS. 209 |? y SP: ING. oserce.cccevenscoees Eicsafemesuavasanae 210 |Plicatula penicillata, n.s. ......... eparmactarnssss er. =P. dubia, var. Sow. MS. Ostreade. 211 |Ostrea iridescens, Gray .+e..ssceccersrssereeeeeses| Vs Te ?= 0. spathulata, Lam. ?= 0. margaritacea, Lam. ?= 0. eguatorialis, D’Orb. ?=0. rufa, pars, Gld. 212 |\—— Virginica, Gimel......cersesssseseeressees eceatl avs ?=O. rufa, pars, Gld. 213 |—— Columbiensis, Ham. .......:sseseeseessecee| Ve Is 214 |—— conchaphila, n.S. ......s+eeees Acebocenes | i ioue 2145|—— (??. » Var.) PAlMULA ..5...+resccesceseeee e. r. Comp. O. Cumingiana, 215 |——, sp. ind. ....0000-. soseeqecvenes Spain sosscocee| VoT Anomiade. 216 |Placunanomia pernoides, Gray.......++ POR nory er = Tedinia pernoides, Gray. i 217 |\——foliata, Brod. .......s..00« SROCED COME Sal 2 +P. pectinata, teste Gray. +P. echinata, teste Gray. 218 |—— claviculata, n. 8....... gscdicy Ue ecdanakbasab eon 2 219 |Anomia lampe, Gray...... Gees ecssssgnecsssacevsen C. Class PTEROPODA. Unknown. Class GASTEROPODA. Subclass OpISTHOBRANCHIATA. Order Tectibranchiata. Cylichnide. 221 |Cylichna luticola, C. B. Ad. .....ccceesereceveees 2 222 |Tornatina infrequens, C. B. Ad. ..rccsssseesees v.r _ ?= Bulla gracilis, Mke. 223 |—— Carinata, NT. Srrsrosveceecereteccerseccnscceesee| Ve I Bullide. 224 |Bulla Adamsi, Mike. ..scsreee Fre OC COPERe COPTER n. ¢ 225 ?nebulosa, Gid...... che ciseipecessansasaccaas er. 226 Quoyii, Gray...... avevcepeesecces aia cceraceatl Male 227 |\—— exarata, D. S, ssseeee Faas kb yeh cana gannasiaealiauter 228 |——, sp. ind. ....... cavatecepecsece spasidewe wines eco]. Lb 229 |Haminea cymbiformis, 0. S. ..sseseseres aaaexeane 1 Philinide. 692 1 Smaragdinella thecaphora, (Nutt.) n.s. «+... am | : Sta, Barb., San Diego, Guaymas. Other Localities. Guaymas. Panama. Bay of Fonseca. . Senegal, Panama, Guacomayo, Atlantic, Panama. St. Elena. S.Diego,S. W.Mex., Pan., W.Afr. Upper California, S.W. Mexico. San Diego, Panama, Senegal, Panama. S.W. Mexico, Island of Muerte, Guayaquil, West Indies. Monterey, La Paz, Pan., Guayaq. Panama. Panama. Galapagos. ;'s ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 25] No. Name. Freq. Other Localities. Subclass PuLMONATA. Order Geophila. t Testacellide. 230 |Glandina Albersi, Pfr. ....cseessesconeceseeneses| Cr To 231 |—— turris ..........ssc0ees Miceagees Ninesaases an beg? Helicida. 232 |Orthalicus zebra, Miill. ....ceceocsscssevseeesesses = Bulimus undatus, Lam. +B. melanocheilus, Val. + Orthalicus livens, Beck. +B. zigzag, Lam. +B. princeps, Brod. 233 |—— Ziegleri, PfY.......06 Rev euarca esses any pieoe 234 |—— ? Mexicanus, Lam..isccccecsscocescscececcces ce. |Brazils, Peru, Columbia, West Indies, Conchagua, Order Limnophila. Auriculide. 235 |Melampus olivaceus, 1. S. .sossecssssceescees trees] Ue |San Diego. Limnide. 236 |Physa aurantia, 0.8. .sccoccesssssecssvvecnee radens =P. Perwviana, Mke. (non Gray). 2a4 |—— eClata, Gld. sacccvcsscnescccces Oey aauaaneaasenes 238 |Planorbis tumens, 1. 8. ..eccscecesssscsceceeccee ae =P. tenagophilus, Mke. non D’Oxb. Order Thalassophila. Siphonariade. 239 |Siphonaria Lecanium, Phil. ..... dooeduoserys “cle » Var. Lind gs cokes hos ewacanaea asunder 240 |—— cequilirata, 1. 8. .....scecccscsersssecsssscecss 241 |——, sp. ind. ......000. recede cedbooccugtccnacenanans c. |St. Elena, Guayaquil. 2. — Subclass PRosoBRANCHIATA. Order Heteropoda. Lanthinide. 242 |Tanthina striulata, n.s. ....sscccceseseeccccsceaeee 242 5 Var. CONtOLtA reeves Naa bavanae 243 |—— decollata, nom. prov.....scccsesssesecesseees Comp. f. globosa, Swains., and J. prolon- gata, D’Orb. Sandwich Islands, Nuttalt. 29s RRO Order Lateribranchiata. Dentaliade. 244 |Dentalium liratum, n. s.. PEEP PEPE REPED 245 |—— hyalinum, Phil, ....... > 246 COFTULATUM, Ne Se cogesctissocceavccescecscces 247 |—— pretiosum, Nutt. ....... teeeeesensecenesvens Order Scutibranchiata. Chitonide. 248 |Lophyrus articulatus, Sow.,,,.ssscccsesssecseesace ce. |San Blas. 252 REPORT—1856. Sts ele Sd eh ee a eee No. Name. Freq. Other Localities. 249 |Lophyrus albolineatus, Brod. & Sow.....+...... We 250 StriatO-SqUAMOSUS, I. S.....csececeeeeeaes ec) ie | 251 |Tonicia Forbesii, n. s..........- RSuAUancassets cece’ 2 252 |Lepidopleurus sanguineus, Rve......0.ss.cseeeeee| Ve De Comp. Ch. limaciformis, Sow. 253 |—— clathratus, n.s........ Desccees aacceceese weve 204 t-——— DUALS, MsSaloscadevsvesdiecess cubsitscssssets 2 254b|——— ——,, var. calciferus .......00.se.s000: eassseie ck 255 |?—— MacAndree, 0. 8....sececsecsseseeceeecseese] 2 206!) ———-" Beant My Se eetstcestectacecospascececcacseed) 2 257 |Chiton flavescens, N.S. ......csseseeeecseees gensae} "0 258 |Acanthochites Arragonites, n.S. s.s..sseceeeee] eo Te Patellide. 259 |Patella Mexicana, Brod. & Sow. ...cssc0es00e0| ¢. |Payta. =P. maxima, D’Orb. 260 |—— pediculus, Phil. .....ccescsscsseseveeveeveeees| Mu. |ACapulco. =P. corrugata, Rve. POU H\———-\GISGOES, (PViilsetess cseestssvseetes sonsosessses vy. c. |S.W. Mexico. ROZmNacellay RD. 1NCegrrccaseorsuesscnedsnsesessscose. | aoe Acmeida. 263 |Acmea mesoleuca, Mie......s.sseees cnevesel“@s1Ae = Patella diaphana, Rve. pI .. |Central America. = Lottia ? patina, C. B. Ad. (non Esch.) sees... (Panama. ?+?4, personoides, Midd. 2 a8 c.cteewsevecnase| eee (Reena bays ?+?4. eruginosa, Midd. . stseeseseseceee| ase | BOdegas. +P. striata, Rve. non Quoy..... ssecsesesesee! ae |Galapagos, +4. mutabdilis, Mke. pars. 264 |—— fascicularis, Mie. ....ssessseeee sessssseeeee] DU. [San Diego. +A. mutabilis, Mke. pars. 265 |—— patina, Esch. (for syn. v. supra) .........| 2 |N. & S. temperate America. 266 |—— persona, Esch. ....scsseeseeee sesesseseeveves! 1 |Sitka—San Diego. 267 |—— scabra, Nutt., Rve., Jay .s0..s.s0s.see0e| 1 {Monterey &c., S.W. Me xico. Non P. scabra, Gld. 268 |—— mitella, Mhe.....cccccccsesssceseseveesecseces| Te Us =P. navicula, Rve. 269 |Scutellina navicelloides, n. S..cesessecveseeeeeeses| 1 Gadiniade. 270 |Gadinia pentegoniostoma, Sow.....ccceerereeeee| Te Co Fissurellide. 271 |Fissurella virescens, Sow. .......scsseceeseseeseee| Ve @. |Panama. [272 Barbadensis, Gmel.]...... 1 {West Indies. 273 TUPOSA, SOWe caascacegeseeeene ress n.u. |Galapagos. +F. chlorotrema, Mke. +f. humilis, Mke. + F. viminea, Mke. 274 |—— nigrocincta, 0.8. cecssseovssvecsssesceveeees| Gs Te ALU t———es NSN. ancyevecergeaadedcrs ceveeicesescesseccn | neal ZAG =A, MS canveceasseacs csedereresectcesevess| | Cs ?+F. gemmata, Mke. (jun.) BUT | Soe Perivianiaiiias. ostccssgseces crsteccsecescs 1 ae Lobos, Iquiqui, Is. Mexil- ones, Valparaiso. 278 |—— SPONGIOSA, N.S. rscecessesssesecevececesevens 279 |Glyphis inzequalis, Sow. ..+....ss0esseeeeereeees| MC. [Guacomayo, Galap., St. Elena, + Fissurella pica, Sow. Monte Christi. +F. mus, Rve. 280 |\—— alta, C. B. Ad. ceccceccscesecsscesesoeescsese] @ Fr. (Panama. 281 |Rimula Mazatlanica, n.s. .essscecessseevsssseeeee| Ce Te ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA, 253 No. Name. Trochide. 282 |Callopoma fluctuosum, Mawe ...sscsesseserreee = Turbo Fokkesii, Jonas. = T. fluctuatus, Rve. 283 |Phasianella perforata, Phil. 2834;—— , var. striulata 284 |\—— compta, GI. .......ccrcrcecccsseseeccssceees 285 |Bankivia varians, jun., Beck ...... CE CCCECLEELCEC 286 |Uvanilla olivacea, Mawe .......... qaereteas aaa . = Trochus brevispinosus, Val. =T. erythrophthalmus, Phil. ?=T. Melchersi, Mke. ——— inermis, Gmel. .......... Ghccsvabiagese oebear = Trochus olivaceus, Phil. (not Wood). =U. variegatus, Gray in B.M. unguis, Mawe = Turbo digitatus, Desh. = Trochus amictus, Val. =T. stellaris, Mke. Trochus versicolor, Mke....... Rivcagebeeenaresaaue ?= Ziziphinus Californicus, A. Ad. = T. eximius, Rve. i—— MacAndree, n.s. ...... wanaedtanenne Wpatenen ?=T7. minutus, Mke. pee SINE. ee aseraen scat edeadanctssdes te civasnccas Omphalius ? rugosus, var. rufotinctus —— viridulus, Grmel.........scecccvseceseees eauae = Phorcus variegatus, A. Ad. =Trochus Brazilianus, Mke. teste Ad. +T. Byronianus, Wood. +T. reticulatus, Gld. MS. —— ligulatus, Mie. .......scseececcseresecenees ?=Phorcus Californicus, A. Ad. —— globulus, n.s. ?= Trochus glomus, Mke. Vitrinella Panamensis, C. B. Ad. ...cecsecceseee —— parva, C. B. Ad. wsssccsceeee ?— decussata, 1. S....ssssessseee Ee INEIEs My Gry cane cdacstn de tiedtacecsseeucsas's'es ———-VINONMIELAy Ns Ne secesndadevacosspacaes Aeendec PRU Aide WS Sa. eases Seaucededeabaustese dew edeees —— subquadrata, 0. 8. ..scsscosssscvesevcvceoes Miata, Tit S. .sckccecattepeo's Cadeeseendesveets F———-(DUONGia, Ts Sa. wel sat ccaccaccaedvesecssecus’ Perparva, Var. NOGOSA .......seeeeeveeees ee Oxia, Co Be AG, Se 453 TOFOCINEVEA, Nl: S.icgussyorcceseesedens 2 454 |Subula luctuosa, Hds......ccccspccceccseccsrcccece ce. |Gulf Nicoya, Puerto Portrero. 455 |Euryta fulgurata, Phil. ............ Me cncetcn essere ce. East Africa. =Terebra arguta, Gld. . 456 |—— aciculata, (? Lam.) Hinds .......s0eeseeee 2 Acapulco, Xipixapi. Pleurotomide. 457 |Pleurotoma funiculata, Val. .........cesceesseees v.r. |San Blas, 8. W.Mex., G. Nicoya. =P. olivacea, var. Rve. a pr. man. 458 | —— maculosa, Sow. ..ccccerssececccscecacscvesace n.u. |W. Columbia. A459) || Drilliavincrassata; SOs, Svcs as cass occcacocsesctees 1 |Panama, Monte Xti. = Pleurotoma Botte, Kien. 460 J— rudis, S0W........ccccseceeeee ea aess estes cic e.r. |Monte Xti. 461 |—— aterrima, var. Melchersi ...........s.s0008 n.c. |Monte Xti, Panama. ?= Pleurotoma maura, Val. ?+ P. atrior, C. B. Ad. ?- P. discors, Sow. 462 |?—— cerithoidea, N.S. ....secccesseeseseeee ae 3 463 |— zonulata, Rve. .....0...sccssceeveeeeeeeseees 1 {Monte Xti, Xipixapi, Panama. = Pleurotoma cincta, Sow. non Lam. 464 |—— monilifera, n.s............ aadectiene one ABsasca|! esi 465 |—— albovallosa, n.s...... Meavamiaciedslech aise sce wee 1 466 AETONOGORA Ma Rc fies sees ercsasss aces oe 3 467 |—— luctuosa, Hinds (1843), non D’ Orb. n.u, |Bay Guayaq., Gulf Magdalena. ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST-COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 259 Name. Freq. Other Localities. Drillia Hanleyi, n.s. .....cscesaseceee SR RAaann naire 1 ——, SP. ind. (A) cecsecccccoensrceesasvnenenensrer 2 —, (NR ciec nee occ cen: Shiba hee eee 2 Clathurella raya, Hinds= ~Defrancia r., Hds,.,| 2 |Gulf Nicoya. AUTEA, Te S. vesereeee “LORE Bee eer 1 Mangelia ? acuticostata, var. + subangulata.... 1 Cithara, sp. ind. .,......- bee Conn Reeee eer TT] eee Conide. : Conus regularis, S02W....ces.ssepessepeeseesersssees n.c, |Gulf Nicoya, Pan., Guaymas. Comp. C. arcuatus, Br. & Sow. in Z. B. Voy., non Rve. —— purpurascens, Brod. ......000seseee0es vesee.| 1. |Panama, San Blas,Is.Annaa[?], +C. comptus, Gld. S.W. Mexico. Comp. C. interruptus, Brod. & Sow. regalitatis, Sow. ......++-6 es ae aeren e.x. |Real Llejos, Pan., S.W. Mexico. ?=C. purpurascens, var. ?=C. achatinus, Mke. —— arenatus, Brug. .......s000 muledecauavaavaenes 1 |East Indies. —— puncticulatus, Hwass. .0r...s.sseerereeees Nn. ¢. —— gladiator, Brod........-ssessesecessereqeceees r, |Panama, S.W. Mexico. BNE R EOD Romer weve ih ae dh sca eecespussucnas e.r. |Galapagos, Taboga. Femmes SCRIATICNII, Cla. cccacennacsbicedtecsanaccitaces 1 ees ING 3 (GB) paayeecmepresas os *> ssensestseean 1 Suborder PRoposciDIFERA. Solariade. Torinia ?variegata, Lam. .....ccecsecsscesseeeees 5 |Panama, West Indies. =EHuomphalus radiatus, Mke.: —— ? gramosa, Val. ......,..cescecseoeveneconones 1 |Acapulco. ?= Solarium fenestratum, Hds. Pyramidellide. Obeliscus ? conicus, C. B. Adses.....cseesseveeees 1 |Panama. Odostomia sublirulata, n.s, .........seeeeesseeee 1 ——, sp. ind. ........ Astrhc | Baek Gen deeBeeec cates 1 Fae ATH ETI AGA, Tn Sav edecdi penn gece des = Voluta ocelata,Gmel. = Buccinum parvulum,Dkr. +C. guttata, C. B. Ad. aes, SP. ING. ...caccscccccosess eUrecerdsvercsasccars Buccinide. Columbella major, Sow........ his tas dea saansacse =C. strombiformis, var. Kien. ?=C. gibbosa, Val. ?=C. paytalida, Kien. —— strombiformis, Lam. ........cccccccscessese —— fuscata, Sow. ....0...sccccesesesetcece meceares =C. meleagris, Kien. eeeeeenee Oreo cece er errr rer Nassa luteostoma, Brod. § Sow. .........0068 ai =N. wxanthostoma, Gray. —— tegula, Rve. ...... Beadiscecsecsdescverestsare = Buecinum tiarula, (Kien.) B. M. Other Localities. c. |Acapulco, Panama, e.c. |Conchagua. 3 |Xipixapi. v.r. |? West Indies. 20 |? West Indies. e.r. |Acapulco. c. |Acapulco, Real Llejos, Panama. n.u. |Senegal, W. Indies, Philippines. n.u. |Galapagos. e.r. |Acapulco, Monte Xti, Panama. West Indies. r. |Acapulco. r. |Galapagos, Taboga. v.r. |Panama, La Paz. n.u. |Panama. t. |WestIndies, Panama, Ascension Island, Africa, Java. e.c. |Panama, S.W. Mex., Is. Muerte. n.u. |Is. Muerte, Panama, Payta. c. |Pan., San Blas, Acap., Mte Xti, St. Elena. e.c. jAcapulco, Real Llejos, Panama. 2° 9 terties wage” ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 263 No. Name. Freq. Other Localities, 6240|Nassa tegula, var. nodulifera, Phil. ......... eo.| Gore 625 ACUtA, TL. S.cserseceeesee Radi fedddunancecs size 4 G26) |——, Sp. 1nd. (G), -.....csceiessonscaduassscaccerees 2 627 |—, 6) i Jcamusiecanemeccafts wadvedetcaneeoaey 1 =e e alia 2 CE Snes aie G29 |\——, —— () eerccsesersoeee Raed reaah sovecess cio Mle 630 |——, —— (€) eccecsesesscneeees C LECpCr eee Ruaees 1 631 ?gemmulosa, C..B. Ad. .....c00eeceseeee0e4, 5 |?Panama. 632 |—— ?versicolor, C. B. Ad....... DLL CERDCCO SECRET e.r. |?Panama. 633 crebristriata, TipiNcrewebes dense Bie sues ita ccens|| lk 634 |——, sp. ind. (f) ...... AS Rca: wo batdecetstes 1 635 |——, —— (9) ssereeeeevees Lally thas 2 G36 |——, —=— (A) cecdssecersersccesscccceccoes Preece 2 3 dp =O) wes ceawedecchnctices 0. adbies mevic deseae wslly. of Pyrulide. 638 |Pyrula patula, Brod. & Sow. ...... sessevesesseeee? C. |Acapulco, Bay Caraccas, Pan. =P. melongena, var., Sow. Muricide. 639 |Fusus pallidus, Brod. & Sow. ......c.sssse0es «| er. |Cailao, Hds. =Pyrula lignaria, Rve. var.= Pyrula turbinelloides, Rve. Comp. P. anomala, Rve.= Neptunea anceps, A. Ad.: also P. lactea, Rve. 640 |—— tumens, N.S. ......00+..05 da 0Tb ae a ode Fad8p! LOD 641 |—— apertus, N.S. ........0.068 Eatseuasbascacdevens 6 G42 |—, SP. ind. (@) csscsscovscesesscsesesseseeecsene] 1 643 Si (D))h donaccigesipass eprdieteyeatpe sence 1 644 |?Cominella, sp.ind. ....... Peiiiccoaboammssemepselhe iD 645 |Anachis scalarina, Sow. .........+ eisovescesearace 3 |Panama, Chiriqui. 646 costellata, Brod. & Sow. ......scseseeeess.| Ver. |Panama. 6462|—— ?—, var. pachyderma .s...cssseeseeeeee v.T. 646¢ Sans (VAT cs conn evaseiee Bess séieses dn 4h 647 |—— coronata, Sow. .......sc.see0e scacerened seas] @. 7. |Acap., Quibo, S.W. Mex., Pan. ?+Columbella costata, Val. ?= Columébella terpsichore, Mke. (non Sow.) Comp. Buccinum giluum, Mke. 648 |—— ?fulva, Sow. ..... Leber dtidvvertevsbsvecusoees 1 |S.W. Mexico, Panama. 649 |—— nigrofusca, n.s....... dosecens sesecsssaseees..| 6 650 |—— serrata, N.S. .cescscscctsrececescscesecssoees 12 651 |—— pygmea, Sow. ......csseeeeeesceees ee REE e.r. |St. Elena, Panama, ?W. Indies. ?+ Columbella costulata, C. B. Ad....... Besa West Indies. 652 |—— Gaskoignei, 1.8. sscsssdecssscessseeesseeeee] 1 |Callao. 653 |—— rufotincta, 0. 8. ...seccssscrsees FUHCU eL EeEee 15 654 |?>—— albonodosa, 1. 8. .+0...04. eat aaa sotces coal G55 |P———y, SP. INA. (@) ..oscrccescccncceerccetroccssacee 2 656 )??}—, (ence tes. .ceemeeetes Bevcases assim 2 657 |—— (Strombina) maculosa, Sow. ............ 2 |Guacomayo. G58 |—— ?—,, Sp. indeee....cseeeseeseeeenens See 2 659 |Pisania insignis, Rve.......... Merveirseterss v.c. |St. Elena, Panama. = Buccinum mutabile, Val. ‘pars ‘(aon Linn.) 660 |—— eequilirata, n.s....... PPURMRR INSEL ooeess Solees il! 661 |—— gemmata, Rve. .....ssescsseeesesseseeesseeee] C, [Monte Xti. = Buccinum gemmulatum, “Mke. =B. undosum, fem., Kien. (non Linn.) =B. mutabile, pars, Val. 662 |—— sanguinolenta, Ducl...........0++ essesseeeee| Ye |Panama. = Pollia hemastoma, Gray. = Buccinum Janelii, Val. = Tritonium verrucosum, Mke. MS. 663: | —— ringens, Rve. ...cccsscovessecsssscssseesvecses) O |Panama, 664 |Murex plicatus, SOW. ...ss.ssesesceeseseeeseseeesee] 1 (Gulf Nicoya. 264 REPORT—1856. No. Name. Freq. Other Localities. 665 |Murex ?recurvirostris, var. lividus ............ n.c. |Guif Nicoya, Panama. = WM. messorius, Mke. non Sow. = Comp. M. nigrescens, Sow. 666 |—— (Phyllonotus) nigritus, Mensch. ......... G +M. ambiguus, Rve. 667 |\—— —— nitidus, Brod. ...cccccccscsereeseneees 1 {Real Llejos, Guacomayo. 668 |—— DDYBSSIGA, PIGIe ceccchscccccvvdesdeeeslee n.u. = WM. ducalis, Brod. & Sow. 669 | —— —— bicolor, Val. ......sesccseceserenseeens e.r. |Acapulco. = M. erythrostomus, Swains. = WM. regius, Sch. & Wagn. (non Swains.) Var.= M. hippocastanum, Phil. 670 |—— TEGIUS, SWAINS...+.ecsecseevreneeeeens c. |Acapulco, S.W. Mex., Panama. = M. tricolor, Val. 671 |—— —— princeps, Brod........:scsserevecssenes r. |Puerto Portrero. 672 |—— (Muricidea) ?lappa, Brod, ....++.....00e- 1 |St. Elena, San Blas. Comp. MM. radicatus, Hds. 673 |—— —— dubia, Swains. ....screreeecsssersesees 3 |Panama. 674 |—— ?erinaceoides, var. indentatus ...... 3 |Acapulco. Gf ——— ———— = BP Hanae oeet bas coe sche setivenscs'ess 2 676 |—— —— pauxillus, 4. Ad. .....csseseceeeecsees fs Analysis of Species. BRYOZOA.. Simic NEP ra. sc chkgeaernens oeeeae : 16 PALLIOBRANCHIATA .. pone eineielbentd bsiovdesadeneisaieviesenindenseame ct esecameee 1 Freshwater 4 LAMELLIBRANCHIATA { Morne ott ae cciean agree 218 GASTEROPODA: Opisthobranchiata.........ccccsesesvereeeees 10 Weaind acess ces Freshwater ... CE ees Pulmonata : \ ae 12 Prosobranchiata: Heteropoda ........- 2 Lateribranchiata 4 Scutibranchiata...... 82 Pectinibranchiata :— Rostrifera ... 120 Toxifera ...... 34 Proboscidifera 193 2 347 a — 457 Ota Fares corcasct dass toatten eens TNS — Fa YO2ZON 1, one vnsdoessecasepanqen 16 LECT TRIS 7d Re eee 5 Freshwater Shells Th Sea Shells . 664 Total... . 692 52. In January 1850, Conrad published in the Journ. Ac. Nat. Se. Phi- ladelphia, a list of new and interesting shells from the coasts of Lower California and Peru, presented to the Academy by Dr. B. Wilson.” It is not Perea ON MOLLUSCA OF THB WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 265 stated in which of these two widely separated localities each species was found. They are as follow :— Solecardia [genus described] ebwrnea, Conr. Petricola sinuosa, Conr.=P. robusta, Sow. Pholadopsis pectinata. the Triomphalia of Sow. ] Parapholas hisulcata, Conr.=Pholadidea melanura, Sow. Penitella Wilsonii, Conr.=Parapholas acuminata, Sow. Triton perforatus, Conr.=Triton Chemnitzii, Gray. Oliva propatula, Conr.=O. testacea, Lam. 53. The following are extracted from the fourth edition of the Catalogue of the Collection of Dr. Jay, New York, 1850*. No, 1421. 2057. _ 2494, 2610. 3346, 3737. 4419, 3437, 3808. 3852. 3919, (The genus here described is the Jowannetia of Desm., No. Pectunculus pectinoides, Desh. 4204. Helix plicata, Born. Guér. Mag. Cuv. Régn. An. pl.87.f.8. Pa- nama. Anodon Montezuma, Lea, Trans. Am. Ph. Soe. vi. pl. 23. f. 55. Central America. Spondylus pictorium, Chenu. W. Mexico. Terebratula uva, Brod. Kiist. Conch. Cab, pl. 25. f. 8-10. Gulf Tehuantepec. Helix areolata,Sow. Kiist. Conch. Cab, pl. 36. f. 10-12. Pfr. no. 393. Columbia River. Helix griseola, Pfr. Kiist. Conch. Cab. pl. 60. f. 17, 18. Pfr. no. 885 = cicercula, Fér.= splendi- dula, Anton. Mexico. Heliz spirulata, Pfr. Kiist.Conch. Cab. pl. 30. f. 11-14. Pfr. no. 56. Real Llejos. Helix Buffoniana, Pfr. Phil. Icon. pl. 9. f. 2. Pfr. no. 507. Helix imperator, Montf. Fér. pl. 52. f.4: 52 B. 1-3. Pfr. no. 789. Central America. Helix labyrinthus, Chemn. vol. xi. pl. 208. f. 2048. Pfr. no. 1035. Central America. Helix lucubrata, Say, Descr. New Shells, p. 13. Pfr. no. 245. Mexico. 8816. . Cyclostoma Meaicanum, Zool. 1838, pl. 10. Pfr. no. 1036. =Carocolla labyrinthus, Lam. =C. Ilaydiana, Lea. Panama, Porto Cabello. 6. Bulimus punctalissimus, Less. var. Voy. Coq. p. 329. pl. 15. f. 3. Pfr. no. 215. Mexico. . Bulimus Schiedeanus, Pfr.=zan- thostomus, Wiegin. Pfr. no, 505. Phil. Ie. pl. 1. f. 12. Mexico. Mke., Thes. Conch. pl. 25. f. 93. Pfr. no. 10. Mexico. . Lymnea ferruginea, Hald. Mon. pl. 13. f. 19, 20. Oregon. . Physa osculans, Hald. Mon. pl. 2. f. 11, 12. Mexico. . Melania Largillierti, Phil. Ie. pl. 2.f.10. Central America. . Melania subnodosa, Phil. Ic. pl. 4. f. 18. Central America. . Trochus mestus, Jonas, Phil. Ie. pl. 6. f. 5. California. . Cancellaria bifasciata, Desh.Lam. A. s. V. p. 413=C. oblonga, Kien. Panama. Columbella Boivinii, Kien. Ie. p. 47. pl. 11. f. 1. Gulf Nicoya. 10,078. Cyprea eglantina, Ducl. Guér. Mag. Zool. 1833, pl.28=C.Ara- bica, teste Jay. California [?]. 54. During the winter of 1850-51, Prof. C. B. Adams of Amherst College, Massachusetts, visited Panama for the express purpose of making collections for the College Museum, and obtaining exact information on points connected _ with habitat and station. Although he only remained thirty-eight days on ' the spot, he collected— Gasteropoda ........ 88,920 specimens of 376 species. Lamellibranchiata 2,860 i 139 yy Palliobranchiata .... 50 oy Te rs, 41,830 516 om The localities in this Catalogue, unless confirmed from other sources, must be received with great caution. The work is, however, very useful, if only for the list of species, and references to an extensive library. 266 REPORT—1856. Prof. Adams had before collected about the same number of marine species at Jamaica; and, holding the theory that no species could be common to the two oceans, he was well qualified to detect any sources of error which might have militated against his own hypothesis. The very minute discrimination also to which he had accustomed himself in his researches among the land shells of Jamaica, would at once prevent him from confounding similar species. And as he visited no other spot than the shores of Panama, and the neighbouring island of Taboga, there is no danger of the admixture of specimens from different localities. The results of the expedition were “read before the Lyceum of Natural History, May 10th, 1852,” and published in their Annals, vol. v. They also appear under a separate form as a “ Cata- logue of Shells collected at Panama, with Notes on their Synonymy, Station, and Geographical Distribution, by C. B. Adams, Professor of Zoology, &c. New York, 1852, pp. 334, 8vo.” The author gives all his references from personal research: quotes every assigned habitat, with authorities (discri- minating original testimony by the mark!); and, in addition to his own remarks, Bees the number of specimens from which he writes. He was not able to dredge, nor to make observations on the animals: but for the shore shells, including the minute species, there is scarcely anything left to be desired. The author describes 157 as new species: of the value of many of these there will be two opinions. Prof. Adams in his work on Jamaica shells, “Contributions to Conchology,” pp. 84 et seg., gives up the common opinion that species are natural groups, while genera, &c. are artificial: and as he believes that there are different species as well as varieties of mankind, it is natural that he should distinguish as species of shells what others might con- sider varieties, and as varieties what may be accidents of growth. To the discerning reader, however, this does not interfere with the extreme value of the work. Ina branch of inquiry so overburdened with carelessly observed or recorded faets, the freedom from the usual sources of error is a matter of the first importance. Where a species has originated in a mere theory, as in the case of common types from the two oceans, the student is at once on his guard. Where it arises from deficiency of materials, as in the C@ea, additional knowledge will soon set the error right. And in the present state of our ignorance, to designate forms as species which will hereafter have to be united, is much more pardonable than to overlook differences, all of which should be carefully noted before we can obtain a Natural history of any single species*. There appear to be three stages in our progress towards truth. In the first, objects are united, simply because their differences are not appreciated : as when Dione lupinaria was considered a variety of Venus dione, Linn., simply because they were each spiny. In the second, minute differences are appreciated, while their harmonies are overlooked. Such is the present ordinary condition of conchological science, as represented in the Achatinelle, Cylindrelie, Anomiade, &e. In the third, species are re- united, with a full perception of the differences among them, from a greater knowledge of the range of variation of which living creatures are susceptible. This third stage, when faithfully perfor med on sufficient evidence, should not be spoken of as “ confounding species,” and is one of the greatest pieces of * In the “ Researches on the Foraminifera,” Trans. Roy. Soc. 1855, p. 228, Dr. W. B. Car- penter states, that “ multitudes of species” will be shown in the present Report to “have been instituted in various genera of Californian sliells by the late Mr. C. B. Adams, whose identity is established by a more extended comparison of individuals.’ This sentence appears simply to embody the impression left by conversation, and not to do justice to the Professor. As I am answerable for the impression I made, I have to request that those who possess the Transactions will make the following corrections :—For “ multitudes of species” read “ several species,’ and for “ Californian shells” read “shells of Jamaica and Panama.” . cae" _ ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 267 service that can be rendered to science: when carelessly wrought, as when an author herds together the species of his neighbour, simply because he has not been able to examine them himself, it truly makes “ confusion worse con- founded.” For the first great requirement in a scientific writer, patient and laborious accuracy, this, the last work of Prof. Adams (for he died in 1853) stands in the very foremost rank. The following is an analysis of its con- tents, for comparison with the fauna of the Gulf of California. It will be observed that the species are arranged in alphabetical order, which may sometimes prevent their affinities from being noted. The new species are described in Latin, with measurements, and with an accuracy which often makes it safer to identify shells from them alone, than from the showy plates and loose diagnoses of some works of the greatest pretensions. Prof. C. B. Adams’s Panama List. N.B. True and falsely assigned habitats are both quoted: the reader will thus judge of the present state of the science. Original authorities are cited in italics. Added synonyms are enclosed in brackets [ ]. Name. Station. 1Ovula avena, Sow..........+ ++.e.2-./00 Small Gorgonia, l.s.* 2)——. emarginata, Sow. ............| «+ Brra aco coucr Ce CcREC uC TAOe 3|—— neglecta, n. 8............ fete with O. avena. 4 variabilis, 0. S. ....seeese0e0s on Gorgoniz: coloured accordingly, |. s. BPN aha: vSees Bae cnGhs aspasmianqash ices cseemesai an tes capes Seen (2? =0. variabilis, var.] 6\Cyprza arabicula, Lam. ......... u. stones, 8=20 in. 1. n. 7|—— cervinetta, Kien. ............{u. stones, 15=20 in. 1. s. ==exanthema, var., Hinds. 8|—— punctulata, Gray ............| with C. arabicula. [?=C. arabicula, var. ] pustulata, Lam. oe... sess. under large stones, 1. s. 0) radians, Zam. ......... ace diliee Bass ceteaabaetet este ease ‘| =C. oniscus, Wood, err. typ. 1j— rubescens, Gray ........0...| seeseeenee Sais enuatagu spaces Pees SANPUINGR, GAY .....0...002| ecdseasscoschecsdeccn cuss 3/Erato scabriuscula, Gray ......... under stones, 1. w. = Marg. cypreola, Sow. =WM. granum, Kien. 4\Marginella minor, 0.8, .ss...cs0...] «: teahit tas geteresstas Peed 5|—— sapotilla, Hinds ............ Moving quickly on li- f quid mud, above l.w. Mitra funiculata, Rve. ......... nce 7/- lens, Wood .....6.4: ahaa 8}—— nucleola, Lam. ............+6 —— solitaria, .8.......cecceesescee under stones, 1. w. H——— tristis, Brod........sc.cisceeis under stones, |. w. 1/Terebra elata, Hinds..............| .. Aevacdanetne auc eee 2 larveeformis, Hds.............| + PRA OSE Peon en i—— robusta, Hds. .........s0000+| + Perce a ebervatee’ shies —— specillata, Hds.............00.] .. ionbatece seer hae tes Other Localities. Conchagua, Cum.; Sta. Barbara, Jewett. St. Elena, Cum. St. Juan, Green; Sta. Barbara, Jewett. Acapulco, Humb.; Brazil, Ravenel; St, Elena & Real Llej., Cum. fAntilles & Senegal, Kien.; Ind. Oc., Jay. Peru and N. Holland, Kien. China, Humphrey; Acapulco, Humé.; Isl. Plata, Cum. Adriatic, Wood; Acapulco, Humb. ; Chili, Ravenei; St. Elena, under stones, Cum: Galap., under stones, Cum. St. Elena, u. s., Cum.; Mexico, Sow. Mazatlan, Jewett; Acapulco, Sloat; St. Elena; Cum. Is. Plata, in coral sand, 14 fm., Cum: Red Sea, Kien.; La Paz, Rich. Java, Kien. Panama, Bridges. St. Elena and Gal., Cum. Montija, 15 fm. coarse sand, Hds. St. Elena & Mte. Xti, 6-15 fm. sandy mud, Hds. 8° 57’—21° 32’, Has. San Blas, Hds. * The following abbreviations are used :—/. w. low water; 3. spring tides; m. neap tides; 4. high water; 4-¢. half-tide; + above; — below; wu. 6: under stones; &c. No. Name, REPORT—1856. Station. Other Localities. Papagayo, San Blas, Hds. 26 varicosa, Hds. .....s.sseeeees| « san aLiaeot sobodondéabetcigad Papagayo, Hds. 27|\——, like specillata ...... Bes fans caliorodacnes + 888030 2p eee 28|——-, slender brown.......+.+++ denfieecuces cee eeaseh see eceaieas 5 29|——, smallolivaceous, white band] .........e+sesseeereceeees 1 30|——, small and delicate ......+.:| ... Deemer a sige swe sias 7 31) —, Spree cereeceee ceepeccnces Scanned), coasted mesetaee's sudeseest oe 32|Oliva angulata, Lam.......s.s..+0e.| « RNAs he ekthcrarcedoes aa Nicoya, Cum.; Peru, Desh. 33/—— araneosa, Lam....cccceecerees| saeees outa howdaecodaak Magdalena, Ducl. [?= 0. venulata, var. ] 34 [? = 0. nivea, D’Orb. ] 36 porphyria, Linn. ....... x C. B. A. cites 42 references for this well-known species. 37/—— semistriata, Gray ...... wana 38/—— testacea, Lam. .....ssse00e 39|——-. undatella, Zam............ = Voluta tenebrosa, Wood. 40) —— venulata, Lam. .......s0000- = (0). reticularis, var. "Rve. 41/—— volutella, Lam.........604+ = V. cerulea, Wood. 42\Planaxis planicostata, Sow. ...... = Buecinum planaxis, Wood. = Plan. canaliculata, Duv. 43|Nassa CaNeSCENS, D. S...+eeeseeee 44|—— collaria, Gould, MS.......... 45|—— corpulenta, 1. Sseeceseeeseneen| seeeees fenesva peeciane sas S-c| ly ?=festiva, Powis. 46|,——. gemmulosa, 1. S. ...+-+... rel Ws -soeecnc. sissy emia sais irae ee 47|—— glauca, 1.8. ..ceereeseeeeecnne| cccaeeresrreeteccnerescetes 32 48|———. luteostoma, Brod. & Sow.. 49|_—. nodifera, Pws. ......... ition be aebeeaee cesateescsee read ye 50|-——. pagodus, Rve.......++..00 = Buccinum decussatum, Kien. (nec Linn. nec Lam.) = Triton pagodus, Rve. 51 Panamensis, N.S. .....005 52|—— proxima, N. S..0esseeseeeee [?=N. versicolor, var. | 53|—— scabriuscula, Pws. ..... 54 RITIATA. SH. Ash owsweccipe esse 55 VETSICOLOM, Ne S..sseee sees 4 56|——._ Wilsoni, n.5.........+ {phos 57|\Buccinum crassum, fds. ..... = Phos crassus, Hds. 58|—— distortum, Bligh .........++. = Pollia distorta, Gray. = Columbella triumphalis, Duel. 59 insigne, Rve.......e00 vesesses| UNder stones in sand | 140 |St. Elena, Cum. =mutabile, Val. [pars. ] 60|——— lugubre, ns. .......+. veseeeees| Under stones, lw. | 175 61)—— pagodus, Rve. secssssereeeers 62|———- prristis, Desh. .....s000. = B. serratum, Kien, .... INCONSPICUA, N.S. seeseeseeee ! HG jenecnnoneds osbopagnennecces jal! Perl! Fes Seedacqovasccssvesssses 3 Brazil, Linn.; Panama, Lam.; La Paz, Green; sandy mud at low water, Cum. sessscsescsesesseesseseess| 1/79 |Salango, rapidly moving by hundreds in| wet sand, Cum NonlWetinoasae sb teseeanies aboore Real Llejos, sandy mud, 6 fm., Cum. Sand and mud banks, l. w., Cum. see] saeee Ameen eee ee erenreeeeee La Paz, Green. eee enka ease eeee neste tans invastnumbers,quickly| 4500 crawling on wet sand. under stones, h.w.--3t.| 1200 Mexico, California, Duel. Galapagos, Cum. jon sand, in run. water,| 330 between tide-marks. Senegal, Kien.; Real Llejos jean Lesson. Galapagos, coral sand, 6-10 fm., Cums B. Montija, Cum.; W. Africa, Kien, 5} Peru, Petit. seme l>salsiaes Boor becnone ecaced| len 2a? u. stones, above l. w. | 1500 Sauk oeeacen'y ahincaesnn Feat. 2 Panama, Bridges. eens as in WN. luteostoma. | 380 |Montija, sandy mud, 12 fm., Cum. Perales EF cidddbecesssaneescusaslaus Eocalvens Motceshsdens coaencrtaas OU BN Petecicaipeittdegihdetevore® ssc 5 prdlecwelchidenccac coca tes ee nes 1 |G. Fonseca, Hds. N. Holland, Kien.; Chili, Desh.; Elena, Cum. erevices of rocks be-| 95 tween l.w.s. & l.w.n. under stones, |. w. 18 1. w. 6 under stones, l.w.n.| 275 San Blas, Burtt; California, Desh.; St. Elena, Cum. oe , “4 - Station. 64|—— sanguinolentum, Diiel.......) under stones, 1. w. = Pollia hemastoma, Gray. =B. Janellii, Val. 65|—— Stimpsonianum, n.s......... | 66|Dolium ringens, Swains. ......... = Malea latilabris +- crassila- # bris, Val. vy. Syn. | 67\Monoceros brevidentatum, Wood. under stones, 1. w. under& between stones extreme low water. on and between rocks, = Purp. cornigera, Blainv. $-t. + | +P. ocellata, Kien. +P. maculata, Gray. 68 cingulatum, Wood .........| clefts of rocks, l. w. under stones and in crevices of rock, l. w. under stones, |. w. | 69|Purpura Carolensis, Rve. ......... | [=P. triangularis, Blainy.] } 70|\—— foveolata, n.s. ........cccce0s (?=P. biserialis, jun]. | 71; —— kiosquiformis, Duc/. ......| on rocks and trees, $-t. to h.w. n. | 72|\——, sp. ind......sseeccesees Le uk casa dees [=P. kiosquiformis, var. =P. scalariformis, Ducl.] 73\——- melo, Desh. ....... =P. crassa, Blainv. =P. melones, Ducl. 74|—— osculans, 0. S........e0eeee [?=Rhizocheilus nux.] | 75|\—— tecta, Wood ........c.sceeeves =P. callosa, Sow. =P. angulifera, Ducl. = Cuma suleata, Swains. = Turbinella callosa, Less. 76/—— undata, [quasi Zam.] ..... [=P. biserialis, Blainv. | | 77\Columbella atramentaria, Sow....| under stones, l. w. 78|\—— bicanalifera, Sow. ............| -seeeseeeeees bre Secrest 79\—— Boivinii, Kien................| pools in rocks, 3—3 | 80|—— conspicua, n. s. (? Anachis).) .......--. Popeeisdéaq chase | 81|—— costellata, Brod. § Sow. .,.) under stones, |. w. | 82|\—— diminuta, n.s. (Anachis),..) under stones, 1. w. $3|—— dorsata, Sow. ......ses.se00s i rocks,4—# tide. soos] Cheeeenesecseneneseneseeees crevices of rock, l.w.n.—l. w. s. .| under stones, 1. w. n. 63|Buccinumringens, 2ve.(not Phi/.)| under stones, 1. w. n. seseeevess.(SideS and crevices of; | 84 fluctuata, Sow. ....e..cseeeees under stones, 1. w. n. | =C. suturalis, Griff. 185|—— fulva, Sow. ......... ee under stones, 1. w.+ ‘86|—— fuscata, Sow....... gah ee ..| under stones, 1]. w.+ | =C. meleagris, Kien. B7|—— gibberula, Sow............. ry [ioe soee Sevevccscascscenece i—— gracilis, n.s. (? Anachis) ...| .--c.+... mass escnsonedscscs 9|—— guttata, Sow. (prim. non| under stones, 1. w.+ postea. ) [= Nitidella cribraria, Lam. =Buccinum parvulum, Dkr.] )}——- haemastoma, Sow...... Seal con cosManelntncce swegeedscn harpiformis; Sow,....... wes.| under stones, }. w. ‘| =C. citharula, Ducl. §2/—— labiosa, Sow..........secseeeee under stones, 1. w. lyrata, Sow. .oo...sse.seeseeee under stones, 1]. w. major, Sow. .....6..s..s0seee.] under stones, ]. w. =C. gibbosa, Val. | =C. strombiformis, var., Kien. | : ® ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. No. of Speci- mens. 275 16 “TI 150 269 Other Localities. 9by7in., Barnes. Adult, 2°3 in.,C.B.Ad.; Quito Is., Guayaquil, Don Pedro Aba- dea ; Peru, Capt. Skiddy ; Payta, Cum. Peru, Chili, Kien.; Payta, Fontaine; Xipixapi & Mte Xti, Cum.; Monte- rey, Rich; San Francisco, Jewett. W. Mexico, Humboldt. Charles Island, Galapagos, Cum. N. Holland, Duel.; La Paz, Green. Mte Xti, under stones, low water, Cum. Chili, Kien.; Real Llejos, Less.; Pana- ma, 10 fm. sandy mud, Cum. Mte Xti, Cum.; Acapulco, Humd. Chatham Island, Galapagos, Cum. sandy mud, 10 fm., Galapagos, Cum. Nicoya, Hinds, Panama and Africa, Gray. Is. Muerte, Guayaquil, Cum. Nicoya, Cum.; Peru, Kien. Panama, St. Elena, Mte Xti, Cum.; San Blas, Kien. ; Acapulco, Less. Bay Carac. and P. Portr., sandy mud, 11 fm., Cum.; Chili, Kien. East Indies, Ascension, Gorea, Kien.; Java, Leschenault ; West Indies. Pan. & Gal., u.s., Cum. ; Calif., Kien. Pan., on dead shells, 10 fm., Cum.; Ma- zatlan, Mke. St. Elena, Cum. Panama & Chiriqui, Cum. Is. Muerte, Cum. 270 REPORT—1856. No. of No. Name. Station. Speci- mens. 95)Columbella modesta, Powis ......]...c,csecsesceoseceseees ceauin RO = Buccinum m., Pow. = Truncaria m, H. & Ad. 96|—— meesta, n.s. (? Anachis) . 97|—— nigricans, Sow. .......... noe OB wre JATVA; SOW. ssuseneitesaceters|frescseesss ansaneseens apes 99|——. pulchrior, n. s. C Nitidella)} “under stones, 1. w. 100|—— pygmzea, Sow. .. under stones, 1. w. ../Sticks & stones, 3-t. + u. S., o-t. — 1. w. Peete e eee eee 101) —— rugosa, Sow. .......seseeeseeee =C. Sowerbyi, Ducl. = C. bicolor, Kien. 102/—— strombiformis, Zam....... Re 103|/—— tesselata, n. s. (Anachis)... 104)-——— turrita, Sow..............0006 we 105 varia, Sow. [non varians, Sow. ] HQG| ———srSDigaks avs candante’> steddcanke«| {ees eaegasseessnuvedes oath 107|Ricinula ?carbonaria, Rve. ...... under stones, |. w. 108 jugosa, n. 8. (ENgina) ...0..|sscescegessseaeesencs sapses 109|——— Reeviana, C. B. Ad.......... ‘under stones, l. w. = Buccinum pulchrum, Rve. 110/Cassis abbreviata, Blainv........c).cccceececceecees eecaschiae =C. lactea, Kien. 111)/—— coarctata, Sow... u. stones, 3-t.—l.w.n. ‘under stones, l. w. Bete eweeeee teeta eeeeees under stones, 1. w. PO oer nee ee tleneneeeeeseeneeeee eeeeeeene 112/Oniscia tuberculosa, Rve..,....+. Oe eee ener er ee ence te teeeees 113/Conus brunneus, Wood ....... --| clefts of rocks, l. w. 114;——- gladiator, Brod. ... u. 8. with sand, 1. w. 115; —— mahogani, Rve. ..... ieseese crawling on very wet s., 1, w. —}-tide. 116 MENEX AMO bus chanvdsce¥s ees 117; —— princeps, Linn...,....... sees =C. regius, Chemn., Lam. = C. lineolatus, Val. 118)——— purpurascens, Brod...... -.-| under stones, l. w. 119 regalitatis, Sow. ....++......| under stones, l. w. 120|——- regularis, Sow....... saseecceelces Heer Pacnoccre anatase “FP eeereeone under stones, l. w. 121) —— vittatus, Lam. .......0.ce00e 122/Strombus galea, Wood aeeeeets coccelenepecccacecenccosccencesss = 8S. galeatus, Gray. 123} ——- gracilior, Sow. ...... eee es 24 —— granulatus, Swains..,......... Gpasesaeeasers wousesasens see eeeteeleetenere eeeene 125|—— Peruvianus, Swains. 126|Triton Chemnitzii, Gray ......... = Argob. nodosum, Chemn. 127/—— constrictus, Brod....... eeu aA ewsisiseaccwepeacs Sseaeeans ?= 7. decussatum, Val. 128 TUROIMER GDB: es ecvevedses sos \>e PPOs a ak ee ces cce cae 129|——— gibbosus, Brod. 130}—— lignarius, Brod. sandy beach, |. w. under stones, l. w. Oe eeeeee Peel eee noes Pete ema eeeeneee seer seeeeees we vaeeeee Poe eeseeeenee seeee 131) —— vestitus, Hds. .......,.. adiasl aes CCE SEE sages cua 9 WANs BEMIOLE y< cesaasaay 132|Ranella celata, Brod, ......+02... =R. semigranosa, Kien. non Lam. U. S., Ass His), Na Be 58 620 1 5 185 1500 1 27 1 380 1 70 1 110 7 1 2 4 70 17 12 9, 3 in. 1 . |Nicoya, reefs, 1, w.; Cumns Peru, Gray.} i Other Localities, Montija, muddy gravel, 7-17 {m., Cum. ; Sta. Barbara, Jewett. Galapagos, Cum. Mte Xti, under stones, Cum. St. Elena, on dead shells, sandy mud, 10 fm., Cum. Pan. & Xipix., Cum.; Real Llej., Mérch. Is. Muerte, Cum.; Payta, Font. .. Montija & St. El., s.m., 10 fm., Cum. Philippines, Jay. Galapagos, Cum. Portugal, Bonanni; Acapulco, Rve. ?N. Zealand, Sow.; Shores of Peru, at} | Acapulco, Kien. ; Gal. in crevices of} | rocks, Cum.; San Juan, Green. ( Gal., clefts of rocks, l. w., Cum.; Au- f stralia, Jay; San Juan, Green. ; Gal., P. Portr., Pan., Cum. Salango, Cum. Galapagos, Cum. Asia, Dillw.; Philippines, Jay; San Juan, Green; Mte Xti, & St. El., Cum.} Annaa, Sow. ; San Blas, Hds. Real Llejos, Cum. ; Peru, Kien. Nicoya & Peru, soft mud, 7 & 23 fm.,| | Has.; ; Philippines, Kien.; Guaymas, Gr.) ; Pan. & Mont., coarse sd., 7-11 fm.,Cum.) Calif. & Tahiti, Jay ; La Paz, Green. India, Kien.; St. El. & Gal., sandy mud,} 6-8 fm., Cum.; La Paz, Green. } Caraccas, on reefs, Cum.; Peru & ?Red] [Sea, Due! i) Mte Xti & Xipix., sandy mud, 7-10 fm., | [Cum. ; Acap. i? Has. Pan. & Mte Xti, coarse sand, 7fm., Cum, P. Portr. & Pan., sandy mud, 7-12 fm,, Cum.; Mte Xti., Hds. Real Llejos, Nicoya & Honda, among [rocks on shore, da | | | Station. ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. No. of Speci- mens. 271 Other Localities. 133/Ranella nana, Brod. & Sow....... 134|/—— nitida, Brod...........ceeceee 135) —— plicata, Rve..........scecese )136/Murex dubius, Sow. ............005 = M. aculeatus,Wd., non Lam. 137|— erosus, Brod. ...... ssseeeee} under stones, 1. w. 138)—— radix, Schroet........-.......| about stones, with q =melanomathos, Dillw. pars. sandy mud, l. w. i [Non M. ambiguus, Rve. ] '139|—— rectirostris, Sow. ............Jeeesees ‘under stones, i W. under stones, 1. w. a eereeeees crevices of rocks, 1. w. n.—l. Ww. s. under stones, 1. w. under stones. 145|Pyrula oan Buge. Se SOWss as’ lbp. wails «acanaapedes ss eda 1146|Ficula ventricosa, Sow............. eee Shee eee =Bulla jose Wood. “47 Fusus bellus, n. s.. feels 148|Fasciolaria granosa, MatNs. ca emened oe in nmud, ‘L w. 9'Turbinella czestus, Brod. ......... sand beach, L w. encore eeneoee Beta Soo. y ciaaiia Sol aaah |e edaenaasssadeeph acainas is lise I—— decussata, Sow. ......ses00.[+ Vee desivaayctacieaen tie |157|——- goniostoma, Sow........ Aer etlecdsepoe eee posi vastoaricaais< 1158|—— mitriformis, Sow.............|+ Be cheats uateae ols Nats isis +C. uniplicata, Sow. .......0.|..seesreecevese osten cence 159|—— pulchra, Sow. .......... gor|Ai be cjlde scab Oremenaewe asst 60|—— pygmea, n.s. ... 161}—— solida, Sow. ........0...csscselecsssceeeees 163|Pleurotoma aterrima, Sow. ...... (64, ———- atrior, n.s. ... [?=P.aterrima,var. Melchersi. ] 165|—— bicanalifera, Sow............{.0« dem see SEE mene 166|/——. collaris, Sow. oreo saceserncsl scares Peder ere eeeeseneeee corrugata, Sow. Munassewsces| Sea eum eiee sass ae +P. turricula, Sow. 69|—— discors, Sow. ..........s000s[0. qesteeae tapesvacesys aT (2+. aterrima, Sow.] 70|—- duplicata, Sow. 1 ?excentrica, Sow a exigua, Nl. S........... Srccsod Peprces Seo eee Eee gemmulosa, n.8......,. ip apaltsle sayaiiersgpae sca vehaae grandimaculata, n.s. ......|... _| =P. zonulata, teste Cum. /9|———. incrassata, Sow. . : =P. Botte, Kien. nigerrima, Sow. +P. cornuta, Sow. 77\- obeliscus, Rve......... csedanle ston aebeswenvenntane eee (Bi —— Olivacea, Sow. ........s.cecselecnccscnscecsccetees eaaees | (Comp. P. funiculata, Sow.] Pallida, Sow.......sesseecveaee eeeeee 74|— eee ee wees eslsaee eet etnee sen eeeereeeeces COe eee tee eeeeen ress yesent 2 300 6 72 2 100 54 in. 1 1 2 14 1 1 4 1 3 5 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 8 12 Is. Panama, Phil., Sow. Caraccas, Cum. Caraccas, Cum.; Acapulco, Humd. Xipix., sandy mud, 11 fm., Cum, Nicoya, sandy mud, 9 fm., Cum, Peru, Bligh; Acap., Humé. Southern coast of S. A., Sow. St. Elena, sandy mud, 6-12 fm,, Cum. I. Muerte, sandy mud, 11 fm., Cum. Caraccas, mud banks, Cum. San Blas, Kien. ; India & China, Desh. Peru, Kien. Caraccas, mud in rocks, Cum, Maz., Kien.; Galapagos, Cum. Pan. & Payta, sandy mud, 7 fm., Cum. Pan., Puert. Por.,s.m. 10-13 fm., Cum. Conchagua, S. Salvador,sd., 8fm., Cum. 1 sp., sandy mud, Cum. 2 sp. sand, 10 fm., Cum. Sand, 8-10 fm., St. Elena, Cum. R. Llej. & St. Elena, 8-10 fm., sd., Cum. Carac., St. El., Xip., s.m, 7-10fm., Cum, Mte Xti, Cum. Montija, sandy mud, 10 fm., Cum. Caraccas, muddy sand, 8 fm., Cum. Mont.& P. Portr., sdy.md., 10 fm.,Cum, I. Plata, coral sand, 17 fm., Cum. » P. Portr. & Mont., sdy. md., 10fm., Cwm. Coral sand, 6 fm,; Galap., Cum. Philippines, Cum. MS, Pan. & Mte Xti,sdy.md.,6-10fm., Cum. Carac., sandy mud, 6-10 fm., Cum, Salango, St. Elena, sdy. md., 5-12 fm,, Cum. ; mud, 4-7 fm., Nicoya, Hds, P. Portr., sandy mud, 13 fm., Cum. 272 REPORT—1856. No, of No. Name. Station. Speci- mens. 180/Pleurotoma rigida, Hds. .........Je0+ eens det bnaskaeeb is 20 181] — rudis, Sow. .....cceeceeseseee aeeresentanass ts Ceaeeeeced 2 182/—— rustica, Sow. ....... BAR CODS: under stones, l. w. 10 =P. thiarella, Kien. 183|\———HWTOSAN Ne. weawececseereerses|Pepstceseeeeccceecdessasse[UUle 184|—— zonulata, Rve. ............064]- shosmunekcesiscosesvaecescs 2 =P. cincta, Sow., non Lam. B85) ———— Satis eee ese nceer scat esictencssa|ess Seastde vases cent Seer a V8G6|—@—y SP. sen scnsccecnccsecccceserece|oons Diets daicigsiso'ene'heraiuie. 1 187|Mangelia, Sp...........ccncocecosscce|nssscesvaecerceveecencssses 1 188) ——, SP. cecssseeessreceee Peeeeeeelcaiuedsesesskcraatesesegecs 1 189] ——, SP. seveercsees eosbonatic Betect tara cdest terns Mace oaicebe 1 190 |=———, SP) Sess ccenstscueces Sovestrealadaass cgi > soenecAECb Belly ‘alk 197} —— neglecta, 0: 8: -.62...2..cccee|ssecesevsececessestecsscees 4 192} —— Psulcosa ........sececseees ...| under stones, lLw.n.—| 170 2= Columbella sulcosa, SOW. ...|-.cceessesssscvecerersoeces Sereeoe 193|Cerithium adustum, Kien. (plate)|wet sand, u. s., h tide. 206 =C. maculosum, Kien. text. 194|—— assimilatum, n. 8............. u. s., sponges, l. w., 8 marine plants, &c. 195|—— bimarginatum, n. s...... An) pocebecar so recone ne 2 196 famelicum; Ty Ss) st. sccesesse| ese site ssdeeeates aetsoeg| LY N.B. The description does not agree with'the type sp. in Mus. Cum., and accords better with C. ? uneinatum, Gmel., also found at Mazatlan. 197, —— gemmatum, Hds......seeesssferersereeceees auvideneenees|iy Lo 198|—— ? interruptum, Mke. Badeoe on & under rks. & st.,} 1100 [=C. Gallapaginis, Sow.: non| — 4-tide—1. w. n. C. interruptum, Sow. quasi Gould.] 199|——, sp. ind........c.sece-eeeeeee 13 PocRoon aac" pukfenccs coves} 30 =C. interruptum, var. : 200|—— irroratum, Gould ......... rock-pools, 3-tide+ | 820 = C. stercusmuscarum, Val. . 201|—— neglectum, n.S. «es...00...| US. in dead shells &| 33 sponges, l. w. 202|\——-. Pacificum, Sow. ...sec.seses[ereeres Beets Serpe aac feed =C. Humboldti, Val. 203} —— pauperculum, N.S. ...scese|eceeeees pdeeincone 2 204|—— pulchrum, 1. 8....ceeeeeenes IDuried i in nmuddy sd.| 125 under bushes at h. w. 205|/—— Reevianum, 0. S. ........05- ditto ditto 190 [ = CerithideaMontagnei,D’ Orb. | 206] —— validum, n.s. ......... weecsale ditto ditto 250 [= Cerithidea varicosa, Sow.] 207|Triphoris alternatus, n.s......+...}- oetrtrseeestcateatne anes 5 208|—— inconspicuus, n.s. .........| under stones, 1. w. 16 209|—— infrequens, 1. 8. .......eceeefeeenceeenseeeecaseeneenenee 2 210|Turritella Banksii, Rve. ......... among & under st., in} 350 [?=tigrina, Kien. ] calc. sd.,l.w.n.—1.w.s. 211\Ceecum Ciminutum, U.S. sevccsses[eceeeeeeeeeeeees canwerkerse| Ma [=firmatum, jun.] 92191 —— eburneum, D.8. cocsccrcscer|seevcesersves Suedenaeeee oy fee [=firmatum, var.] 213|/—— firmatum, 0. S.....+.00+ Seate| keeetas ss Subic seesetisdaser| OD 214|—— leeve, N. S......0.0eeeeee eerily Seeavensnes aasneeneransens 2 215|—— laqueatum, N.S. «eeeeeeeee ce |cone maealieelded Asaeseceseis 2 21 GI —_ MOnstrosuM, 1.8. ccecceseslecoeccterreveceecees Seaeect hd, [=firmatum, adol.] ~ Other Localities. Mte Xti, under stones, Cum. Xipixapi, Cum. Mte Xti & Xipix., sand and gravel, 7 fm., Cum. ..../Annaa, & Ld. Hood’s Is., Cum. Indian Ocean, Red Sea, Kiener. Cumana, Humb. Sandy mud, 10 fm., Cum. No. of Name, Station. Speci- mens 17|\Ceecum parvum, N.S. .........ccefesseeecereneres eeaceitos nee 1 | [?=C. undatum, jun. ] | haa —— PpygMxum, DLS. ....eeeee ailaae cae eiabe seepesiine peeve race [=C. firmatum, jun. | '219\Chemnitzia aculeus, n. S. ..0....s.|eseeeseeececens saewesestey 4 \2 220|——acuminata,n.s. (?Chrysallida) cenccsteeceecceees sginesenbe 1 1)—— affinis, n. 8. .........e0008+ aval seaate Reaslesneecees Sheeurut ae 2|——clathratula,n.s.(Chrysallida)]......sss.sseseseeesseveees 10 3|—— communis, n.s.(Chrysallida) under stones, l.w. 90 224 —— gracilior, 1.8. .....sesesereee|errs cee eneveneeeetsoeaeees 2 }DJ——_ MAJOL, N.S. ...ceeseseeseececeleerecs RaawAaastbeseattecste| tank 226|—— marginata,n.s.(Chrysallida)|...ccsssssessecssesesseeees| 2 7|—— Panamensis, n. s......- ees..| Sand, 3-t.—h. w. ll 128} ——- similis, n.s........ pba aealabeses ones Gbiiscisie eee ie nns wails ie 9} —— striosa, 1. S.......eeee00e whewel chs scuaweanes Chcatiasees, Peay a 30 ROUT AGAS «(By isso cabcceacas-cfoes ade Seavcucettonnetoedeecl, Wha 1)?Littorina angiostoma, n. 8. (?Fos- as ese seaswenaees 3 sarus.) 2|—— aspera, Phil..............00+ ledges or large pieces of rock, h. w.+ 32|—— SEVAT a ba ssine ee mpie| Be weisiinich wish Fate aeoeiias sa 33 3|—— atrata, n.S. ..... Fiess dees eeia in or near cavities of | 3300 rocks, 3-tide—h. w. large piecesof rk.,h. w. conspersa, Phil. .. excavata, N.S. (FOSSAruS) .|...-++..sseeeseesseeseeeees 1 fasciata, Gray ........ were on trks. & brs. of small} 160 trees, 3-t.—h. w. ee reat, Th. 8. (SBOSSATUS) si [b.-..04e0+stwesccsnenscnees 2 megasoma, 0.8. (?FOSSaTUS)|.+....s+0ssssesseeeeeeeeees 1 —— ?parvula, Phil., var. dubiosa.|cav. of rough ledge of} 600 [Comp. L. Philippii.] rocks, h. w.-++ 24(0|——-. pulchra, Sow. .....-...04. --.| On mangroves, grow-| 11 ing from mud, h. w. — 241; — puncticulata, Phil. .........Jon pieces of rk., h. w. = ere, var.] 242) VaTid....e00e+...e00ee maaan on trunks & branches} 300 of trees, $-t.—h. w. Rissoa clandestina, n. 8. .........{++ PS Sen ee webs OSE 2 4|———. firmata, 0. S......-...+6+ cevopalacrsessccnessssesenssencaas 1 5|——_ fortis, TA) eee under stones, l. w. 31 inconspicua, n.s. Gad seneneaee Ho EERE CEN | Po! —— infrequens, N.S. ..,...s00s..Jeee open deems oocecs 1 48\——- Janus, nS. ....-+..008 sodoasuleeed Sessacs es ctasa nt 2 9} notabilis, n.s. ..... RO ete dePrancas~ adapeess 1 ScalarifOrmis, 1.8. .........Jessseeeesees piinasa Ol te Petricola cognata, n. S....... Pen cats acceceke Seeecees 1 ; ?=P. pholadiformis, Gld. MS. 1 Eis cadecsostscdeaessatoe male tds 78|Saxicava ? tenuis, Sow............| soft stone, 3-t 1 bl [?=S. pholadis, Linn. var.] 79\Cumingia coarctata, Sow. 4 —— trigonularis, Sow 3 4 1 , Sp. c lv. 34}. Mle wctscnsctesasannsenssecon|se. shendegRecianawewsesasc|iiue IE j | Prof. Adamsregardsthe above } as “ probably new species: but | as their characters are probably } somewhat variable,” prudently | forebore from describing them | without more specimens. They | are probably varieties; as Cu- | mingie, like other nestlers, are | most variable in form and | sculpture. mphidesma bicolor, n.s. ..-..... ? ellipticum, SGWrsssascs scans i proximum, n.s. .... wes =Semele proxima,M. Cum. pars: | pars=S. proxima, B.M. Maz. Cat. p.28, = S.flavicans, Gld. | 18 | ie ki * % ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. . |sandy mud, 6-10 fm., Cum. lv. 20 |Monte Christi, 9 fm., sandy mud, Cum. 279 Other Localities. Is. Muerte, sandy mud, 11 fm. Cum. G. Nicoya, coarse gravel, 12 fm., Cum. Var., mud, 5 fm., Tumbez, Cum. Mazatlan, Green. B. Caraccas, Guay., Chiriqui, Cum. Nicoya, Cum. Maz., Green; Sta. Barb., Jewett. soft sandym.,10 fm., Cum. ; ; Rio Janeiro, [Jay. Monte Christi, sandy mud, 12 fm.,Cum. St. Elena, Hani. Guacomayo, coral sand, Cum. sandy mud, 12 fm., Cum. sdy.m.,3—5 fm., Tumbez&Chiriqui,Cum. sdy.m.,6—9 fm.,St.Elen. &Salango,Cum. sandy mud, Tumbez, Cum. * Closely allied to 7. Jimaculata.” Guaymas. Pascomayo and Lambeyeque, Cum. Caraccas, sandy mud, 7 fm., Cum, St. Elena, stones, deep water, Cum. 280 No. Name. Station. 488|Amphidesma pulchrum, Sow. ...|...seccsccecssereeeeseeees 489|—— striosum, N.S. .......005 Oa de oS eae Se Saaaie s'de.e nt 490| —— tortuosum, 0. S.........000- ed aaa deaaes «eis hbeotic 491|—— ventricosum, n. s. (? Kellia)}........0......006 * 492\Crassatella gibbosa, Sow. ......... 493|Mulinia donaciformis, Hanl.[?} [?=M. angulata, Gray.] 494|—— ventricosa, Gld. ............|..6 Bebchaereeseccnweresnee [=Mactra exoleta, Gray. | 495)Lutraria elegans, Sow. (Mactra).|.........cesesessseeee ceded Not ZL. undulata, Gld. teste C. B. Ad. 496|Mactra velata, Phil. ...... dea sdedc shine swept Bapate sec necmeecs 497|Anatina alta ....... Pageanwe apr pedweelbeoestenccseswer vee s mawee (? Thracia or Periploma.) 498/Pandora cornuta, n.s. dlikns dacheectees Pee eee Hen 499|Potamomya eequalis, n. s.......... soft mud, under man- groves, near h.w. & outlet of small stream, tleeeereee Pewee ete eesesaeeees with Arca tuberculosa. 500|—— inflata, n. s. .......... eancemes r - “ 501/—— trigonalis, n. S........0...s008 rr, 5 “4 502|Corbula bicarinata, Sow. ......... u.s., deep in sd.,l.w.-++ 503|—— biradiata, Sow. ......see.csseslerecessecesceees Siisiswacanes 504|—— obesa, Hds. ....... Salts araeneneckinetabecatensemactne sce 505|—— ovulata, Sow. ......ccccecesc|ececceseescrcsccscessceccess 506|—— rubra, n.s. ......... aasepeenal toe sca paswadeapisabis seb ait FO ditt COMIN SOU ai cis aweicitawe ses ee cul anebedeselnedeseceasenceecc 508/——,, sp. a, like Taheitensis ...|....-+..sesesscseneceeeeees 509 Mis Da taccacacesnteidssiacsaostancuele ebsiatadeenian eas Seleemueniaee 510|Solecurtus affinis, n.s........... Sl Sipe dudescdueass's eee [ Lew. 511/Solen rudis, n.s. ...........2000e- coarse sd. among st., 5]2/Pholas crucigera, Sow. ....00.....-|..ee0s gas «Sew se gcanaesties =crucifera, Sow. = cruciger, Mill. 513| —— tubifera, Sow. ........ Spaces pepe swhevadianass sinaseaeca 514|—— xylophaga, Val. (non Desh.)|filling the bottomof an old ‘‘dug-out,” h. w. 515|—— sp. a, like lanceolata ......|......ceccecsceceseeceseees 516 5 BDO echowty sceswerteoae mappa Menezes eae descesseeaad 517\Orbicula Cumingii, Brod.......... underside of st., 1. w. REPORT—1856. Other Localities. Carac., Cum. teste Sow. in P. Z.S.; St. Elena and Pan., Cum, teste Sow. in} LConch. Ill. St. Elena & Xipix.,sdy.m.,11fm., Cum.;} [Payta, Fontaine. “The Atlantic analogue is L. canali- culata, Say.” Rl. Llej., Carac., St. Elen., sdy. mud,’ Chiriqui & Carac.,s. &m.,3—7 fm., Cum, 8° 57/-21° 32’, 22-33 fm., Hds. : Bay Montijo, sandy m., 12 fm., Cum. . [Maz., Jew. Is. Puna, B. Carac., Nicoya, soft sand-|) stone, %-t.; soft stone, l.w.; hard clay, 13 fm., Cum. , Carac., in decayed wood, 10 fm., Cum. ; [Payta, Fontaine, “ Like S. Caribeus.” $f % Payta, St. Elena, 1. w.—6 fm., Cum.; Chili and Peru, Desh. If this list of species be estimated according to the standard of judgment followed in the Mazatlan Catalogue, which is necessary for a fair comparison between the two, the following numbers will not be needed :— Univalves: 5, 33, 52, '70, 72, 164, 174, 199, 211, 212, 216, 218, 241, 330, 334, 337, 343, 348, 349, 362,=20. Bivalves: 422, 432, 482, 483, 484,=5. The names given to 459 and 471 are also not required. Others may be discovered on a comparison of specimens or figures (which it is to be hoped the Trustees of Amherst College, who possess the types, will cause shortly to be published), though they are not recognized from the The discovery of a large number of deep-water species was due to the hermit crabs. Certain observed differences of station between Messrs. Cuming and Adams are very interesting; in a few there may be error; from others we learn what great latitude is allowed to some of the descriptions alone. =o i ‘ ~ pe. ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 281 species: e.g. Corbula bicarinata is quoted alive from low water to 17 fm.; while Anomia lampe, quoted from low-water mark, was found by Major Rich as far north as Monterey in 60 fm. water! Of the 157 species described as new, 5 had already appeared under other names, and 15 are believed to be only varieties. Fifteen are named from their doubtful characters or similarity to other forms; 8 are designated from their habitat or station; 23 receive names expressive of their small size; 5 are designated according to the number of specimens found; and 6 would probably not have been constituted, had the same shells appeared in the Caribbean waters. The following is a comparison of the above collection with that of M. Reigen from Mazatlan, excluding from the latter the land and freshwater shells and the Bryozoa; and bringing down the number of species in Prof. Adams’s Catalogue to the standard adopted in the latter. Pan. Maz, Common. 136 | 215 38=28 per cent. Bivalves. 356 449 77=21°6 per cent. | Univalves. 492 | 664 | 115=23'4 percent.| Total. a a at eb Le ae [synonyms. 12 | 104 Old species united: not including 139 | 209 New species described. 61 | 108 Indeterminate species. 2 73 | 298 25=34 per cent. Minute species. 55. The following are extracted from the British Museum Catalogue of the Veneride, &c. by M. Deshayes. The minute division of species in this and in his recent articles in the Proc. Zool. Soc. contrasts somewhat strangely with the opposite tendency displayed in his extremely valuable edition of Lamarck’s Animaux sans Vertébres, a work which has been employed throughout, but not quoted, simply as not containing original authorities on our present inquiry. Page. No. 13 25 Dosinia turgida, Rve. = Artemis tenuis, Sow. jun. Central America, Sale. 76 70 Dione brevispinata, Desh.= Cytherea brevispina, Sow. jun. California. 135 48 Chione callosa, Desh.—Ch. Nuttallit, var. Non Dosinia callosa, Cony. California : not Sandw. Is. 192. 8 Venerupis foliacea, Desh. Mazatlan. : 207 1 Petricola mirabilis, Desh. [Monterey, Hartweg, teste Sow.| California. 253 37 Cyrena Fontainii, Desh.=olivacea, Cpr. Non C. Fontawii, D’Orb. Mazatlan. 254 39 Cyrena solida, Phil. Abbild. Conch. p. 78. pl. 1. f.9. Nicaragua. 257 49 Cyrena Floridana, Conr. Mazatlan and Florida. The Mazatlan specimens are C. Mexicana, jun. 56. The collection of which the following is a list, came into my possession _ exactly as it was received from a sailor; who brought it from a single port on _ the west coast of North America. The purchaser, judging, from the preva- _ lence of Mazatlan shells in it, that it came from that place, did not make _ exact inquiries at the time, and the sailor could not be traced afterwards. _ Though consisting mainly of shore shells, the collection was so remarkably _ free from imported specimens, that it derives some value as a geographical authority. The general accordance of the species with what we know of 282 REPORT—1856. the local-fauna of Acapulco, makes it probable that it came from that place ; but it is cited in the B. M. Mazatlan Catalogue as “ S.W. Mexico.” 1. Solecurtus violascens, n.s. B.M. Maz. Cat. p. 27, note. 1 pair. 2. Tellina princeps. Fine: 1 aigtiee * 3. Tellina rubescens. | pr... so) 4. Mactra elegans. | py........ bate P. 5. Mactra angulata. 1 pr. ......P. M. 6. Dosinia Dunkeri. 1 pr. ..-...P. M. 7. Dione aurantiaca. | val.,fine...P. M. 8. Dione chionea. ly. .........P. M. 9. Venus amathusia. 1 pr. Sores M. 10. Venus Columbiensis. 1 aa! ..P. M. 11. Tapes grata. 1 pr. ......eere P. M. 12. Anomalocardia subrugosa. lv. P.M. 13. Anomalocardia subimbricata. Valves, COMMOD.......... Bacbcoundas see Ss. M. 14. Cardita affinis. 1 pr.ese...eeeee rockge 15. Chama frondosa. Lv. scsceesesee: ie 16. Cardium procerum. Rare. ...P. M. 17. Cardiumconsors. ly. (Guatemala). S. 18. Cardium maculatum. 1 V.......++- Ss. 19. Lucina tigerrina. 1 fresh val....M. 20. Modiola capar. 1. «s-s..0 M. C. 21. Mytilus palliopunctatus. Rare....M. 22. Arca Pacifica. 1 pair ......... P.M. 23. Pinna ?rudis. Htremiels thick and large valves .e2.s.ssescoseors P.M. . Pecten ventricosus. . Pecten 2 senatorius. . Margaritiphorafimbriata. Common. P.M (Colouring ex- tremely variable.) Valiesy com- 28; B. (China Seas. Perhaps an allied sp.) 2 fresh pairs. . Ostrea conchaphila. Valves. P.M.C. . Ostrea palmula. lpairaeses: M. C. . Placunanomia foliata. 1 fresh valve. . Bulla Adamsi. Rare...........0++- M. . Siphonaria gigas + characteristica. Common ....... *cuiotioandectios Sancti ae . Patella discors. Common ...... M. - Acmea scabra, 1 sp. ..-....-. M. C. . Acmea grandis, Gray. Common. C. . Fissurella nigropunctata. . Uvanilla olivacea, . Uvanilla unguis. . Pomaulaxundosus. Fresh opercula.C. . Callopoma saxosum. Rare......... re Com...P. Rare Common....... M. . Tegula pellis-serpentis = strigilatus, Anton. Not uncommon ...... P. . Nerita scabriuscula. Large and COTIMON .0¢..cecescorssvescssess .M. . Nerita Bernhardt. Abundant. P.M. . Crepidula aculeata. . Crepidula 2unguiformis. 1sp. P.M. Isp. S. P.M. * §. South America. P. Panama. 45. 46. 47. Crepidula arenata. 1 sp. Scat Galerus conicus. 1 sp...... ‘S. P. M. Galerusmammillaris.. 1 sp....S.P.M. 48. Crucibulum umbrella, Desh. =ru- M. Mazatlan. . Aletes Peronii. . Turritella goniostoma. . Cerithium maculosum. . Cerithium famelicum. . Cerithium uncinatum. Rare... . Cyprea exanthema, var. cervinetta. M. . Cyprea arabicula. . Trivia pustulata. Rare.. . Trivia radians. . Strombus galea. . Strombus gracilior. . Terebra robusta. . Pleurotoma funiculata. . Drillia rudis. . Conus Mahogani. . Conus gladiator. . Natica maroccana and vars. . Natica excavata. . Polinices uber. . Polinices(Galapagosa?=) otis. Very 2 . Ficula decussata. . Marginella prunum}. Very rare. P. . Oniscia tuberculata. . Cassis coarctata. . Malea ringens. . Oliva porphyria. . Oliva cruenta (Tahiti. ? imported). dis, Brod. Common, fine, and ~~ variable . Crucibulum spinosum. Isp. 8.P.M. é. . Hipponyx Grayanus. On Pinne. 1 sp. . Cerithium stercus-muscarum. Rare. P. M. lsp....P. M. P.M. COMMON «| c.cccsrescdescsasanentrs Very common. Ss. P. M. Ar Secon 1 sp. oS. P. M. 1 Sp. ecccesoes P.M. Strombus granulatus, Common. S. Rare...S. P. M. L sp. deecee savedatlys lsp. ...M. 1 sp. .cceeeese S. P. M. Conus regalitatis. Veryrare. P. M. Uy oeaen Geos cuales Uisereemenees P.M. Abun- Avis .cscottesesenaceaetteaetes P.M. Very rare...... P. Rare ...... S. P. M. rare Peete eee e reece ersesesseeeeseene Rare ses.cs P. M. Rares-csenc PR: Wearerasbeeosseees Es Lisp:...- seeder ee Pesp., dine 210. P. 1 dead shell. . Olivella volutella. Very common. P. . Aragonia testacea. Common. P. M. . Latyrus concentricus, Rve. Rare. P. . Latyrus castaneus, Rve. . Latyrus tuberculatus, Brod. Rare. P. . Cuma tectum. . Vitularia Rare. P. lsp ei ded (fresh, with Lispivereseseee es Pe ME tee e ee eeeeeeees opere.). C. California. + Both this species and M. sapotilla, Hds., are quoted from the West Coast. aul 7 ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 283 88. Purpura patula. Rare ......0..---M. 94. Columbella labiosa. Rare......S. P. 89. Purpura biserialis. 1sp....S.P.M. 95. Anachis rugosa. 1 sp. .....+0.8. P. 90. Purpura triserialis. 1 sp......-++ M. 96. Anachis fulva. 1 sp. s...000 P. M. 91. Purpura melones. Rare......00 8. P. 97. Pisania ringens. Rare ......++ P.M. 92. Monoceros brevidentatum,Gray. lsp. 98. Murex radix. Rare...... SyBaciedaancs P. S. P. 99. Murex regius. Common......P. M. 93. Columbella fuscata. Rare...S. P.M. This collection, containing 99 species, of which only one is certainly and another perhaps imported, shows what a common sailor may do, simply by keeping his shells from being mixed. One species is new; 46 are common to both Mazatlan and Panama; 29 are found at Panama, but not at Mazatlan; 6, though not yet quoted from Panama, are southern types; 14 are found at Mazatlan, and not at Panama; 6 are northern types, being found in Lower California, and of these, two (viz. Acmea grandis and Pomaulax undosus [operc.]) were not found at Mazatlan. 57. In the Proceedings of the Boston Soc. Nat. Hist. for Feb. 1855, Dr. A. A. Gould described the following land and freshwater shells from the western part of N. America :— P. 127. Helix eruginosa, San P. 129. Planorbis ammon, Gld. Colo- rado Low Desert, Dr. T. H. Webb, Gld. Francisco, Dr. Bigelow. P. 127. Helix infirmata, Gld. San Fran- cisco, Dr. Bigelow. P. 128. Physa bullata, Gld. Dr. J. G. Cooper. P. 128. Physa humerosa, Gld. Colorado Desert, Dr. Th. H. Webb; Pecos River, Mr. W. P. Blake. P. 128. Physa virgata, Gld. River Gila and near San Diego, Dr. Th. H. Webb. Oregon, Mr: W. P. Blake. P. 129. Planorbis gracilentus, Gld. Great Colorado Desert, low lands, Dr. T. H. Webb. P. 129. Amnicola protea, Gld. Colorado Desert, Dr. T. H. Webb, Mr. W. P. Blake.= Melania exigua, Conr. (read Feb. 13th). P. 130. Amnicola longinqua, Gld. Co- lorado Desert, Mr. W. P. Blake. The same gentlemen appear to have made collections on the coast; of which the following lists have been obligingly sent by Dr. Gould. Collected by Dr. Thomas H. Webb. AT GUAYMAS. Acmea eruginosa [=A. mesoleuca, var. ]. Neritina picta. Nerita “? precognita, C. B. Ad.?= Bernhardi, Réel. Chlorostoma rugosum, var. Ar San Disco. Tellina nasuta. Donaz. Venus dispar. Venus, sp. Cardium Californiense. Arca pernoides. 1 valve. “‘ Lieut.Webb.” Pectunculus (dead, rubbed). Pecten (dead valve). Ostrea. Fissurella crenulata (very young). Halhotis ? Kamtschatkana. Trochus viridulus (very red var.). ‘ Lieut. Webb.” Phasianella compta. Calyptrea hispida,=Cruc. spinosum. Cerithium irroratum, Gld. Potamis pullatus, Gld. Cerithidea albonodosa. Natica ?uber. Ranella muriciformis. Oliva splendidula. Nassa luteostoma. Nassa tegula, Rve., dead. Purpura emarginata. It is probable that some of the above shells, as Ranella muriciformis, Oliva splendidula, Nassa luteostoma, Natica uber, had found their way northwards by the accidents of commerce. None of them were seen by Mr. Nuttall, who spent some time at the place. 284 REPORT— 1856. Collected by Dr. Bigelow at San Francisco. Venus rigida, Gld. Cardium Nuttallit. Mytilus Californianus, Cony. 2=Tapes diversa. Lottia scabra, Gld. (=spectrum, Nutt.’ Natica Lewis, Gld. (opereulum only). Purpura Conradi, Nutt. Collected by Mr. William P. Blake. At San FRrRAncIisco. Mytilus edulis, or allied. Lottia scabra, Gld.(=spectrum, Nutt.) At San Pepro. Semele rubrotincta, Conr. Tellina secta, Cony. ~ Tapes gracilis, Gld. Venus discors, Sow.“ =grata, Say=sta- minea, Conr.”’ Venus Nuttallit, Cony. Venus fluctifraga. Lucina orbella, Gld. Lottia patina, Esch. Lottia scabra, Gld. Scurria pallida, Gray=mitra, Brod. Trochus mestus, Brod. Calyptrea hispida, Brod. Crepidula incurva, Brod. Oliva biplicata. At San Disco. Sphenia Californica, Cony. Tellina vicina, C. B. Ad. Tellina secta, Conr. Solecurtus Californianus, Cony. Petricola carditoides,Conr.=cylindracea, Desh. Venus fluctifraga, Sow. Cardium cruentatum, Gld.* Modiola capaz, Conv. Pecten ? purpuratus. Pecten monotimeris, Conv. Bulla nebulosa, Gld. Bulla virescens, Gld. Bulla longinqua, Gld.* Bulla vesicula, Gld.* Melampus olivaceus. Phasianella compta, Gld.* Potamis pullatus, Gld. * “Not yet from the press.’’ Gould in litt. 58. The latest conchological traveller who has visited the West N. American province is Mr. T. Bridges+; who, in the spring of the present year, has brought a collection from the Bay of Panama. Although he had no dredge, and the district had been well explored, he succeeded in finding 24 new species, besides others new to the fauna of the place. The new species are described in the ‘ Proc. Zool. Soc.’ June 10th, 1856, pp. 159-166 ; and, with a few others, interesting for their locality, are as follow :— Corbula ventricosa, Rve. 2 Scrobicularia produeta, Cpr. 2 viridotincta, n. s. Tellina rhodora, Hanl. fausta. Deshayesii, n. s. Strigilla disjuncta, nu. s. Semele obliqua, Wood. planata, n.s. Cumingia trigonularis, var. Lyonsia diaphana, Cpr. Mactra (Mactrelia) lacinata, nu. s. elegans, jun. Cyclina producta, nu. s. Lima angulata, Sow. Melampus Bridgesii, u.s. Umbrella ovalis, u.s. Mouth of the River Chiriqui. Also found exactly in the same place by a French naturalist. Pyrgula quadricostata, n.s. Erato ? Maugerie, var. Panamensis. Trochus (Ziziphinus) MacAndree [B. M. Maz. Cat. no. 290]. Hipponyz planatus[B.M.Maz.Cat.no.348 ]. Cithara sinuata, n. s. Mangelia acuticostata, n. s. ? striosa, C. B. Ad. 2 rigida, var. fuscoligata. Clathurella intercalaris, n. s. serrata, 0. 8. Drillia punctatostriata, n. s. ? Pleurotoma gracillima, n. s. Scalaria regularis, u. 8. tiara, n.s. subnodosa, ui. s. Cumingii, n. s. Hindsii, n. s. Cirsotrema funiculata |B. M. Maz. Cat. no. 569] Natica excavata, n.s. Polinices Gallapagosa, Rve. ?=ovum. Mitra solitaria, C. B. Ad. ? Triton crebristriatus, n. s. Phos biplicatus, n. s.° Latyrus tumens, n.s. Triton eximius, Rve.=parvus, C. B. Ad. Anachis pygmea,var., exactly resembling the W. Indian Col. costulata, C. B. Ad. + The Mammals and Birds brought by Mr. Bridges are described in Proc. Zool. Soc. 1856, pp. 138-143. 7 SP ene ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 285 59. Having now presented the results of all known expeditions on the coast, we have further to bring together species collected from stray quarters. The following are described in the ‘ Proc. Zool. Soc.’ 1832-56. Most of the Gulf shells were collected by Lieut. Shipley, and of those from California by Mr. Hartweg. * Page. Proc. Zoou. Soc. 1832. 57|Marginella cypreola, Sow. [? Erato]... 59|Chiton lavigatus, Sow. .........+.+5 eee 1833. 1834. 1835. 43 leucodon, Sow. ..c.cessseseseeeecees = V..Californiensis,var. testeSow.jun. 43|—— Californiensis, Brod. (non V. Ca- lifornica, Cour.) pinaria.) * 50|Monoceros cymatum, Sow.......s00..000. 4 = WM. lugubre, Sow. 5 50 unicarinatum, Sow..... Neagiew nant oF ig = M. brevidens, Conr. 109|Pecten subnodosus, Sow. var. @...... pe 110 circularis, SOW. ...scse0e satastastuls s'la/s = C. approximans, Beck. 1842. =C. olorina, Ducl. 199|Buccinum elegans, Rve. ....0...scssceeeee 1843. 5|Donax punctatostriata, Hanl....... Reuse 5|——- carinata, Hani. ..-.....+5 Siam ease sa 33|Pectunculus giganteus, Rve. .........++- 79|\—— bicolor, Rue. .......sceeeeseeee hee =P. inequalis, Gray, non Sow. 166/Terebra aciculata, Hds. (?Lam.) ...... 1844, 29), ——_ hexagona, Sow. jun. ....seevesecess | .76|Marginella imbricata, Hds....0ee.cs0eee \a 139/Ranella triquetra, Rve. ........++ 55.008 |} =| 1845. % ot culter, Hanl. ...... seeenasasenens * Locality. Acapulco, St. Elena. Guaymas, Mr. Ealing of H.M.S. ‘ Sapphire.’ San Blas. Acapulco. Gulf of California. Guaymas. Is. 3 Marias (Gulf Calif.). “ Gulf Calif. & Js. Guaym.” (No loc.) but ».P.Z.5.1843, p-164,no.67,whereHinds gives it, on the authority of Mr.Cuming, as “ Guay- mas, 10-12 fms., sandy mud.” Acapulco, Acapulco. Is. 3 Marias. Guaymas. Guaymas. San Blas. California. (no locality) Gulf of California. Guaymas. “ Mexico.” California. (no locality (no locality Guaymas, Babd, R. N. Gulf of California. Acapulco. 27|Scalaria indistincta, Sow. jum.........-+ “S.Blas, Hon. Mr. Harris.” Acapulco, Col. Moffat. Acapulco, Col. Moffat. San Diego, Nutt. var. a. “* Matzellan.” var. 6. Acapulco. Cruz.—Mus. Cum. Station. under stones & sand. under stones at low water. on the sands. 1 sp. on sands. on sands.—Mus.Cum. in sandy mud, I. w. on the sands. on rocks in exp.situat. coarse sand, |. water. sandy mud, low water. sandy mud, 7 fms. sandy mud, 7 fms. q 286 REPORT—1856. | Page. Proc. Zoou. Soc. Locality. Station. 1845. 75/Glandina nigricans, “hs pembuea reece t ede Vera Cruz.—Mus. Cum. 75|—— monilifera, Pfr..........ss0..s+e+.--/Mountain of Coban, Vera : Cruz.—Mus. Cum. a 131)Helix ventrosula, Pfr.........e0eee+s+++0.| Mexico(Hds.) Texas(Sow.) 132; —— Hindsi, Pfr. ....... Gaaneeecenansh eds Mexico(Hds.) Texas( Sow.) 139|Littorina aspera, Phil............ sessseeee(Nitka, Barc.; Mex. Hegew.|rocks at low water. 140|—— Sitkana, Phil.......... Soctsvcexee as ws Sitka, Barclay. rocks, 3-t. 141|—— modesta, Phil. ......sesee0...e002+.Sitka, Barclay; Mauritius,|rocks, 4-t. 1846. Capt. Caldwell. 24\Cypreea pulla, Gash. ....ccccscsessceeveee ? 29|Bulimus fenestratus, Pfr. ......-0+.ss008 Mexico. 29 Darwini, Pf?........00000 sereiesbens Galap., Darwin. on bushes. 29) —— sculpturatus, Pf7. ....cccceseeesenee Galap., Darwin. on bushes. 30 Gruneri, P/r.......... Retics@rars'as se Mexico. 31|Achatina cylindracea, Pfr. .........4. .| Tortilla, Centr. Am. {damp places. 32|/— (Glandina) Sowerbyana, Pfr. ...|Totontepec[?Tehuantepec]|decayed veget. matter. 32|/—— ex Isabellina, Pfr..........00+ Mexico. dec. trunks of trees. 32)/—— (——) Tortillana, Pfr......... Coe Tortilla. damp places. 54|Haliotis splendens, Rve.......... Saatcruen California. 58|—— aquatilis, et Rane Kurile Is. 113/Bulimus Moricandi, Pfr. ....... "|Mt. Coban, C. A., Lattre. 1849. 117|Anomia lampe, Gray ....s..sss.seeeseeeee California, Lady Wigram. 121|Placunanomia macrochisma, Desh...... Kamtschatka, Deshayes. =P. Broderipii, Gray, MS. Onolaski, Mus. Cum. 121) —— cepio, Gray .seecerseseee ceashaceest California, Lady Wigram. 122 alope, Gray .....ss.006 ABSA seeee«| California, Lady Wigram. 130|Helix Baskervillei, P/fr...........02ss000. Vancouver’sI., Baskerville. 170|Sanguinolaria tellinoides, 4. Ad. pl.6.f.6 Gulf of California. 1850. 187|Melania maxima, Lea ....eerssceesssees Copan, C. A. 195|—— polygonata, Led..,.......sseeeees ote Copan, C. A. 203)« Modulus Carchedonicus, Lam. cially « Atooi, California, Nutt.,” = Monodonta Sayii, Nutt.” Atooi teste 4. dd. is in the Sandwich Is., not in : California. Mr. N. found no Modulus in California. M. car- chedonica, Lam. is the W. Indian 1851. species, teste D’Orb. Coll. : 12|Columbella Californiana, Gasé....... ose Sandeago. : 153|Infundibulum Californicum, 4. dd. ... California. ; 157|Phorcus Californicus, 4. dd.......... ea California. y 164|Ziziphinus annulatus, Martyn .......... Monterey, Hartweg. = Trochus virgineus, Gmel. 165|—— filosus, Wood, Ind. Suppl. pl. 5.| Str. San Juan de Fuco. : f. 23. a ?= Trochus castaneus, Nutt. $ = T. ligatus, Gld. - 168 Californicus, 4. Ad. ..... ee eieweaten! California. ?= Trochus versicolor, Mke. 190|Margarita calostoma, 4. Ad. ............ Juan de Fuco. 197\Tedinia pernoides, Gray ....+..++.+.+++ ? California. =Placunanomia pernoides, B. M. Maz, Cat. = 225|Velutina Sitkensis, 4. 4d, ....0+..0.000+- Sitka. 233|Natica intemerata, Phil.....+...sseeceeeee Gulf Calif., Rev. — Steel. 260|Helix annulifera, Pf7......2...:.eseeeneees Panama, Kellett & Wood. =H. labyrinthus, var. sipunculata, Forbes, P. Z. S. 1850, p. 53. pl. 9. ” f. 4. 272|Lagena Californica, 4. Ad.......+0++.+++. California—Mus. Cum. i nnn eee UUEEEEInSEEEE EES SSnSSEnEnEEEEEESEEEENE ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. Proc. Zoou. Soc. 287 Locality. Station. 60|Bulimus nucula, Pfr. .e....scscssceeseeees 82|Orbicula Evansii, Dav., pl. 14. f. 32-34. 100|Cardita Californica, Desh. ......+2s.s+.0+ 157|—— incrassatus, Pf1.....seccsecseeeveess 1353. 70|\Typhis fimbriatus, 4. Ad. ....0ccccreseee 71|Murex pauxillus, 4. Ad.....0+.... 71|—— fimbriatus, 4. Ad. .....0.04+ 71|—— armatus, 4. Ad. ....cecccececcesceeee 96|Semele Californica, 4. Ad.......se0s.000+ 174|Morum xanthostoma, 4. Ad. ........005+ = Oniseia tuberculata, var. a, Rve. 185|Pseudoliva Kellettii, 4. dd............ aAe 1854. 20|Cyrena (Anomala) insignis, Desh. ...... 21 subquadrata, Desh. ....seeeseeees 22|—- (Anomala) noe pee Desh. ... 23|—— Inflata, Desh.......seeeeessevee eeeeeereerecses 42|Typhis grandis, 4. dd. 67|Mactra angusta, Desh. feaseeccocae 342)\Corbicula convexa, Desh. 351|Donax bella, Desh. .. Pe eeercecrsscesees Galapagos. Bodegas. Gulf of California. Galapagos. Gulf of California. Gulf of California. Gulf of California. Gulf of California. Gulf of California. Galapagos. bably Lower California. | Bay of California. California. Central America. Panama. California. Panama. Gulf of California. California. Gulf of California. Gulf of California. California. California. Central America. Acapulco. 351 Conradi, Desh. ......scssseseeoseeee Jun.=D. culter, Hanl. +D. contusus, Rve. + D.Californica,Desh. MS.nonConr. ?+D. radiatus, Val. 352| —— obesula, Desh. ....scscessseeseeeeee =D. Californica, Conr. non Desh. 352|—— ovalina, Desh. ....... seen 68" 359/Tellina Mazatlanica, Desh............0+++ 362|—— brevirostris, Desh... bebe 363 —— delicatula, Desh. .......sssessseeee i 100| Achatina (Glandina) conularis, Pfr... } 116|Bulimus verrucosus, Pfr. .........000. } 121)Rhizochilus (Coralliophila) Californica, | A. Ad.[ =Murex nuz, Rye.] | 183|Erycina papyracea, Desh. we ; 224\Dosinia simplex, 4. 4d. [not “Artemis q simplex, Haul. = D. Dunkeri,Phil. ] | 228|Pandora claviculata, Cpr. ....ces.ssss00 | 228|Lyonsia (Osteodesma) (aasihans, hci | 229|Periploma excurvata, cae Sak csmcoemaat } 229|— papyracea, Cpr... California. Central America. Central America. Mazatlan. +--+] C. America & California. Mazatlan. Bay of California. Mexico, Sallé. Galapagos. Gulf of California. West Columbia. Singapore. Mazatlan, Lieut. Shipley. Mazatlan, Lieut. Shipley. Mazatlan (Gruner). Mazatlan (Mus. Cum.). | 229\Thracia squamosa, Cpr. ........sseseneee ‘| Mazatlan, Lieut. Shipley. | 230 | 230 Donax semistriatus, Cpr. [non Poli]... =(Donaz) Serrula Carpenteri, H. & _ A, Ad. Gen. ii. 405. 230|Diplodonta subquadrata, Cpr. .......+. 231|Chiton Montereyensis, eee devesasnaene 231|—— Hartwegii, Cpr.......... 232) —— regularis, Cpr. ....... eerecteceeess ?Scrobicularia producta, Cpr. ........- Gulf Calif., Lieut. Shipley. Gulf Calif. (Mus. Cum.) Mazatlan (Mus. Cum.). Monterey, Hartweg. Monterey, Hartweg. Monterey, Hartweg. on exposed rocks. on exposed rocks. under stones. 288 REPORT—1856. Page. Proc. Zoou. Soc. Locality. Station. 1855. 233|Patella ?toreuma, Rve., var. tenuilirata) Monterey, Hartweg. 233)/Galerus ?Sinensis, var. fuscus............ “G, Calif.” (Mus. Cum.) (Probably from another source, by error of ticket.) 233|—— subreflexus, Cpr. .......c.cesesess “ G. Calif.” (Mus. Cum.) 234|Fissurella nigrocincta, Cpr.........++.... Mazatlan (Mus. Cum.). | (The locality is omitted by accident } in the Proceedings.) | 234 Callopoma ?fluctuatum, var. depressum| California (Mus. Cum.). | (=Turbo funiculosus, Kien. pl. 30. f. 1. Diagn. postea visa.) | 234|Litiopa divisa, Cpr.........cccssecsessceees CapeS.Francisco*, Hds.Str. Sunda, among small drift- ed canes, Mus. Archer. 235)Scalaria reflexa, Cpr. ........cssessceveeee San Blas, Capt. Donnell. |1 sp. 1856. 41|Fusus pallidus (animal deser. by Gray)! Guaymas. 41|Pisania elegans > ~ Panama. | 41|Triumphis distorta 5 Be Panama. 43|Malea ringens as i 44 Imperator, ? n.s. x ay Panama. 44|Callopoma saxosum 6 ES ) Panama. 44/Tegula pellis-serpentis ,, Panama. 167|Crucibulum spinosum, var. compresso- California (Mus. Cum.). conicum. | 167|—— ?? imbricatum var. Cumingii ...| Callao, Valparaiso. —_| 168|—— ? imbricatum, var. Broderipii ...| ? Peru (Mus. Cum.). Trichotropist Gouldii, 4. 4d. ......... / Chiriqui, Bridges. 60. The following species and localities are extracted from the “ Concho- logical Illustrations, by G. B. Sowerby,” a small but exceedingly valuable work, remarkable for the excellence of the figures, but the disappointing brevity of its information. No. 2 SG. Cardium Indicum, Lam. N.W. Coast of America. 76 11,35. Chiton fastigiatus, Gray. California. 152. tunicatus, Sow. = Katherina Douglasie, Gray. California. 54 Bulinus unifasciatus = Bulinulus undulatus, Guild. St. Vincent’s. 115 32. Cyprea sanguinea, Gray. Panama and Mexico. 61. The following are taken from the “Thesaurus Conchyliorum,” by — G. B. Sowerby, continued by G. B. Sowerby, Jun. The illustrations are excellent; but some of the later numbers do not equal the earlier portions. Several of the Monographs are very carefully drawn out by Messrs. Hanley, Hinds, and A. Adams. There are the same geographical errors as in other similar works. No. Page. Pl. Fig. 46 15 101. Pecten laqueatus. N.W. America, Capt. Dixon (California, Rve.). 48 96 25 141. Scalaria indistincta, Sow. jun. San Blas, Hon. — Harris. 13.115 36 20,27. Columbella festiva. “ Brought from Acapulco by H. Cuming,” [who never was there]. 64 173 43 63. Terebra variegata, Gray=T. africana, Gray, Griff. Cuy. “ Gany- : mas, 10-12 fm., sandy mud, Cuming.” * Probably in Ecuador ; not in Upper California, as supposed when described. s + This shell, described as “ differing from the typical genus in the canal of the aperture being almost obsolete,” i is regarded by several eminent conchologists as a dead Melania. It was found near the mouth of a river. ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 289 No. Page. Pl. Fig. 18 352 70 50-2. Terebratula Californica, Kist. ‘Abounds on the coast of California.” 91 534 116 249-51. Neritina Listeri, Pfr. Cuba and St. John’s Riv., Nicaragua. 55 578 123 79,80. Bulla nebulosa, Gould. Sand, 12 inch. Guaymas. 12 615 128 35. Cytherea intermedia, Sow. jun. “ California, Chraiag 59 628 132 98. chione, Linn. “Mr. Cuming’s specimens are from Mazatlan.” 65 631 132104-6. circinata, Born. =Venus rubra, Gmel. ?+C. alternata, Brod. Mazatlan, Capt. Donnel, R.N. 71 632 132 109. brevispinosa, Sow. jun. 1 sp. California. 3 656 140 2. Artemis ponderosa, Gray, Anal. 1838, p. 309. =Cytherea gigantea, (Sow. MS.) Phil. Abbild. pl. 7. fh Sandy mud, low water. Gulf of California. 65 697 146 41. Tapes diversa, Sow. jun. Monterey, Hartweg. 16 708 153 17,18.Venus simillima, Sow. jun. California. 18 709 144 26,27.—— amathusia, Phil. Abbild. pl. 11.f.4. =V. encausta, ? cujus. California. 24 769 165 30. Venerupis paupercula, Desh. P.Z.S. 1853, p. 5. [N. Zealand, Mus. Cum. et Brit. teste Desh. | “Mazatlan, Cuming,” teste Sow. 25 811 171 33. Obeliscus clavulus, A. Ad. Onthesands. Acapulco, Col. Moffat. 143 881 184 246. Cerithium assimilatum, C. B. Ad. “ Shells of Jamaica. A darkly coloured Jamaican shell, like C. trilineatum,’’ Phil. Medit. [=C. assimilatum,C.B.Ad.,Pan.Shells, no. 194. C. terebellum, C. B. Ad. Contr. Conch. is the Jamaican species. ] 62. The following species* are extracted from Mr. Reeve’s ‘ Conchologia Iconica’; a work, the principal advantage of which is, that it figures the specimens in the Cumingian collection. The species are often very minutely subdivided: for this indeed the author may not always be answerable. It is to be regretted that there is sometimes a want of precision in the statement of localities}. Station. fj : Locality. Amphidesma Californica, 4. 4d. ......... eessseree | esses (Gulf of California. = Semele C., A. Ad. P. Z.S. July 1853. proxima, [Ave. quasi] C. B. Ad. ... seeees [Panama [?] [=Semele flavicans, Gld.: v. antea, p. 279. no. 487.] Donax contusa, Rve. ...ccccscesessrcsseseees Beach ssees (Mazatlan. [=D. Conradi, adol.: ‘v. B. M. Maz. Cat. p. 47.] Mactra angulata, Gray, MS. ....ssssseereee| seoes Gulf of California. —— elegans, Sow. Tank. Cat. .........06 ‘ Florida, Mus. Cum. [?] —— angusta, Desh. P. Z. 8. 1854......... ereees Panama, Cum. ——— Californica, Desh. ,, Beiiascasasss California, Mus. Cum. Lucina annulata, Rve....., HER Ae “cannpeneee ? California. Arca Brasiliana, Lam. ......secseeseeeeeses (ON ‘the sands . coves |f San Blas, Bay of Califor. =A, cardiiformis, Sow. nia, Cum.”[!] Rio Ja- neiro, Lam. Pectunculus giganteus, Rve. ....... sesseeee| Sandy mud| 7 |Guaymas, Badd. inequalis, Sow. P. Z.S. 1832 ......) sandy mud| 10 |Bay Panama, Real Llejos, = Arca pectiniformis,Wd.,S.pl.2.f.11. Cum. * See also pp. 187, 208, where many of the species now quoted would have been arranged, had I been able to refer to the Conch. Ic. whenever occasion required. tT When Mr. Cuming is given as the authority for depths and stations in places which he Neyer visited, the more correct phrase (now generally adopted) would perhaps have been “Museum Cuming.” The following instance will show the need of caution. Under Mactra ‘carinulata, Desh. pl. 10. sp. 38, we read ‘‘ Gulf of California: from the same locality as Mf | donaciformis.”’ On turning to the latter, we find its locality given as New Zealand. 1856. U 290 |: REPORT—1856. Pl. | Sp.| Fig. Name. Station. Rey es ... {(Pectunculus bicolor, Rve. P. ZS. 1843..| ---erreee | seeeee Gulf of California. =P. inequalis, Gray, Z. B.V., non Sow. {nec Krauss. ] Pecten ventricosus, =P. tumidus, Sow. P.Z.S.1835,p.109, non Turt. —circularis, Sow. _,, »» p.-110} sandy mud ?=P. nucleus, var. Hinnites giganteus, Gray, Ann. Phil. 1826,| ---++..-- vol. xii. p. 103. [ =Hinnita Poulsoni,Conr. 1834,Journ. Ac. Nat. Sc. Phil. vol. vii. pt. i. p- 182. pl. 14.] Spondylus limbatus, Sow. Thes. Conch.| «+e. seeee p. 427. pl. 88. f. 51. [For the Mazatlan specimens, v. B. M. Cat. no. 208.] vadula, Rve. ..ccscsecccsserecensarsenee| stternecs Pfr. Jay. Sow. in Thes. Conch.| sandy mud | 6-10 |St. Elena, Cum. ; also Phi-} lippines, Cum. i 7 |California, Cum. [!] California and Straits of Juan Fernandez [!]. | 2,3 |Hinnites giganteus,Gray, Ann. Phil.1826,) -+-s-00+- | seers E ‘ Panama and Mazatlan. weeeee if Tehuantepec, Capt. Dare. ... |Bulimus fenestratus, Pfr. no. 258 4802) ..s.secee | errr Mexico [? ubi]. 8; .. |—— Gruneri, Pfr. s) DBS 4845) ceesecee | veeeee Mexico. i—— rudis, Anton, 39 DBD DOSZ) ccseceaae va) eters Mexico [sp. 216, err. typ. |: Panama. weeeee Helix uncigera, Pet. .11....csseecereecnerens| serewenes Caracolla u., Petit, Guér. Mag. Zool. 1838, pl. 113. —— Baskervillei, P/r.P.Z.S.1849,p.130| ......... Siphonaria gigas, Sow. ..ccesceceseseeserees] seeeeeene —. characteristica, Rve. ....cccsecseereere| enreee Sug —— equilorata, [Rve. quasi] Gray, MS.) .....+++ March 1856. [S. eguilirata, Cpr. B. M. Cat. no. 240. Apr. 1856.]} sesees Galapagos and Panama. ~ «+++ [Galapagos and Panama. a,b |—— amara, [Rve. quasi] Nutt. MS. ...) seve | eetees [?=S. Lecanium*, Phil. var.] Chiton albilineatus, Sow........cececeeececes] ceveceees [seers Guaymas. j——— articulatus, Sow......sesseeeee l. w. [San Blas, Cum.’’! saeeee Sitka, Lady Douglas. | Central America. 1 W.C. Cent. Amer., Sinclatiy; “ Valparaiso, Cum.,” Ry “ Never took it,” Cong ipse. ‘‘ Monterey, Har weg,”’ teste Mus. Cumiy —_— Sitkensis, Rve. (non Midd.).......+ J——— scaber, Rve. .ccccscsescreccecssereseees —— Proprius, Rve.......sescecesereseeeerees Patella Cumingii, Rve. ..creccssseeceseeeees| seveseees + [=Aemea patina, Esch. ] eeeeee teens weeeee 38) a,b |\—— clypeaster, Less. Voy. Coq. vsseeeees| seseeeees | cereee Monterey, Hartweg. @ 7 [? =A. patina, var.] S| 18] a, B, © |\——_ venosa, Rve. ...serccseesseerevecereeeee] cee ennees .... [Is. Chiloe,W.Col. [!!], Cai al ne exarata, Nutt. .........ceccescsersceee| sescecnee ssseee (Oregon, Lieut. Baskervil ‘ The P.exarata,Nutt.,of Jay’s Cat.2814, and of Nuttall’s coll. is from the Sandw. Is. The Oregon shell may be a variety of the shell called Ma- zatlanica, probably = A.cassis,Esch. Monterey, Hartweg. _ 24| 60 a, b, ¢ |\— cinis, Rve. [= A. patina, var.] voce) ssescceee aahias 26| 67| a,b |—— vespertina, Rve.........cccccsseeeeceeee| ceeeeeeee | ceeees Panama and Gulf Cali 27) 69} a, 5, c |—— toreuma, Rve. .......sssseeereeeeneees| caceeeeee | ceeeee Monterey, Hartweg. _ © Specimens of this species (along with the proof-sheet of Siphonariade) were sent, at — Mr. Cuming’s request, for the use of the author of the Conch. Ic., but no notice of it has been 5 | found in the Monograph. As Mr. Nuttall found no Siphonaria in California, it is presumed that Mr. Reeve’s species, if of Nuttall, is from the Sandwich Islands ; if “ Californian,” that it — is the Mazatlan S. Lecanium, Phil. jf . \ ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA, 29] Name, Patella livescens, Rve. [allied to P. Reeeences Mazatlan toreuma] —— spectrum, Nutt.[=P. scabra, Gld.| ......... California. non Nutt. ] Mazatlan, Shipley. seeeee (Oregon. «esses (California, — discors, Phil. Abbild. pl. 2. f.6 ...) ....... —— Nuttalliana,Rve.[?= A. patina, var.]| ......00. —— verriculata, Rve. [ =A. patina, var.]| ...... tea —— leucophza, Nutt. [ = A. pelta, Esch. | seeseeese- ——umbonata, Nutt.[=A.persona,var.]| ses... ... [Upper California —— Oregona, Nutt.[ =.persona,Esch.]| sss.006 seseee (Oregon. —— scabra, Nutt. [non Gld.=spectrum,| ......... | secces Upper California. Nutt.] ——fenestrata, Nutt. [= A. patina, ME oll ee Corer aad eee cr Upper California. ——navicula, Rve.[ = A. mitella*, Mke.}| oe... ocaces Mazatlan, Shipley. seeoes |California, 1. w. Pee eeeene rere ry add oiea arab - |Conchagua, Belcher. 10 |Panama, Cum. i—— sanguinea, Rve........... Sbrcessaccnyas |i seeees ate aaa California, Mus. Belcher. Ampullaria Columbiensis, Sow. MS.......| cceccceee | voce, Chiriqui, Veragua. —— Cumingii, King, Zool. Journ. vol. v.|_ ....... ada icra ee Is, Taboga, Panama. p. 344. —— cerasum, Hani. Conch. Misc. ......| ...ceecc. | ceseee Mexico +. Haliotis corrugata, Gray, in Wd., pl.8.f.5) ......... -seses (California, —— Cracherodii, Leach, Zool. Mise. 1814, vol. i. p. 131. =H. glaber, Schub. & Wagn. Californiensis, Swains. Zool. Mustr.| ......06. | sesese California. vol. ii. p. 80. Turbo tessellatus, [Rve. quasi] Kien......) .cccccees California. i —— marginatus, Nutt. MS.....0....s.0000| sesee aie Upper California [?]. Neritina Californica, Rves.....cccccssesseee! see peaade California. itasee Cuba, Nicaragua. ; Panama. St. John’s Riy., Nicaragua, San Diego [?auct.]. —— Maugeriz, Gray, Sow. Conch. Ill! ....... no. 111. f. 30. —— Californica, Gray, Z. Journ. iii, 365.) oss... i———_ rubescens, Gray, P. Z, S. 1832,} under st. p. 185. shoals Galapagos, Cum. * It is to be regretted that the author of the Conch. Ic., when describing so many new “Species of Limpets from the West coast of America, did not avail himself of the previous labours of Eschscholtz and Menke in the same field. __t Supposed to be from the Reigen (Havre) Col., as well as other species described from _ Mexico: but no dependence can be placed on the localities of the shells sold at the auctions: | @ antea, p. 249, . 02 Se 292 REPORT—1856. Name. fee a eee Cyprea suffusa, Sow. Conch. Il.n.1 QG.AAL.| .cerreeee = C. armandina, Ducl.* Conus pyriformis, Rve. ......++0+++ sosaecse sandy mud | 7-10 |Caraccas & Montija, Cum. —— pbrunneus, Sow. P. Z. S. 1834 ...... clefts of rks.| ...... Puert. Pt., Pan., Gal., Cum. Vittatus, LaM..cccccccsscesceeresversens coarse sand | 7-11 |Bay Pan. & Montija, Cum. — Mahogani, Rve. P. Z.S. 1843 ...++ sandy mud | ...... |Salango, Cum. [? C. interruptus, var.] ——— MINIMUS, Linn. ....cceeesecetteneceeces| —teeeeeees sesee (Ceylon.—Is. Annaa, Cum.|§ var. B.=C. tiaratus, Brod. «....++++++ pools onsds.| ...... Galapagos, Cum. —— regularis, Sow. Conch. Ill. f. 45 ...| soft mud - eres Hinds. ... |—concinnus, Brod. P. Z. S. 1833.....- on thesands}...... “ B. of Calif.,” Babs, R.N. ,6 |\Natica alabaster, Jive. [P= uber, var-]| ceseseeee | cveeee Mazatlan. ,5 |— Chemnitzii, Récl.MS.1855, non Mie.) sssseuvee | ereeee Panama. | ees perspicua, Récl. in Pet. Jour. Conch.| ...cceeee | eeeeee Mouth of Oregon, Lieut. | vol. i. p. 379. pl. 14. f. 1, 2. Baskerville. —— bifasciata, Gray .seeseevereeeereneers sand 1. w. |Guaymas, Mr. Babb, R.N, ——= Uber, Val. cevscecsesersvevseceeeoseneees muddy sand} 4 Casma, Peru, Cum. f —— umimaculata, Rve..rcccesereesecrreene| ceeneesee | seers Mazatlan, Lieut. Shipley. .|Senegal. Harpa Osea ....cesssesere coseeeeeeenenen sees Acapulco, Cum. [!] — crenata, Rve.=H. rosea, var. Kien.| sandy mud | d. w. =H. Rivoliana, Less. [=H. testudi- nalis+H. Mexicana, teste Jay.] Dolium ringens, Sow. Tank. Cat. App. Payta, Cum. Bee = Malea latilabris, Val. Cassis abbreviata, Lam.--C. lactea, Kien. . |Acapulco. +. centiquadra- C. doliata, Val. a,6 \Oniscia tuberculosa, Sow. Gen. p. 2 Var.| .seseevee | ceeeee Gulf California, Mus. Cum” a,b |Voluta Cumingii, Brod. P. Z. S. 1832 ...| «s.r 9 |Gulf Fonseca,SanSalvadory ... |Turbinella castanea, Rve. .++s-esss-s009 ....crev. of rks.| ....., |Panama, Cum. [Cu = T. acuminata, Rve. Conch. Syst. : non Gray in Wood Suppl. cee [——_ Cerata, GrAY.cr.sereeseseenerererevence under st. | 1. w. |Galapagos, Cum. _.. |— tectum, Gray [Cuma] .....-...+--++ sandy mud | 10 |Bay Panama, Cum. ; _., |Fasciolaria princeps, Sow. ...eerecereesssee] veeeseees | creeee Peru, Cum. a,6 |Olivaangulata, Lam.=V olutaincrassata,| sandy mud| 9 |Gulf Nicoya, Cum. é id Dillw. = O. azemula, Ducl. reticularis, Lam. sscsecseesessesseeees « yays. = O. araneosa, Lam.+ O. Timo- ria+0. venulata+ 0. obesina+ O. pindarina, Ducl.” _|Is. Granada, West Indies Gulf of California, Don aeeeeeeee paceeeees | weveee Gulf Calif., Donnet. eeeees a,b |—— Cumingii, Rve. ..scseevressrere eneceoe ‘ AB ec a. [| ——testacea, Lam. serrrcesererserseecerees sandy mud| 6 |Real Llejos, Cum. —— biplicata, Sow. Tank. Cat. App.p.33| sands 1. w. |Monterey, Hinds. severe |California. seeeeeeee lineolata, ‘ Gray, Wood Suppl.= O. dama, Ducl.” [O. lineolata, Gray, Z. B. V.=0. dama, Mawe, in Wood Suppl.] —— undatella, Lam. 0. nedulina+ O.\sand & mud) 1. w. Bay Panama, Cum. ozodina, Ducl. banks a,b |\—— anazora, Ducl. sesceersersrecereeereers sandy mud| 10 {Xipixapi, Cum. ac |—— tergina, Ducl. ssecccsserererereseres ..| sand banks |...... Conchagua, Cum. a Z ‘ sandy mud| 6 |Phili pines, Cum. Triton clandestinus, Chemn. ..+...0++++ { eecier at. Ll ae G ike fais ; H —— pagodus, Rve. [Nassa] -eesssseesees] seesereee | seeee Bay Montija, Cum. —— pictus, Rve. c.cccceeercerereerenseees ..| under st. | 1. w. |Galapagos, Cum. Purpura patula, Linn. ...esesseeeereeeee Seal a ceaseoucep|tepsens Philippine Is., Cum. — bicostalis, [Rve. ?non] Lam. ...... on rocks | 1. w. \St. Elena, Cum. a,b e the Pacific or the Caribbean { * Whether this and C. subrostrata (Rve. pl. 26. f. 147) b —Vide B. M. Maz. Cat. p- 379 3 species, or whether they are identical, has not yet been decided. ‘ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 293 Pl. |Sp.| Fig. Name. Station. oer Locality, 4) 23] ... |Ricinula alveolata= Purpura a., Kien.| ......0.. | vee .. (Panama, Cum. Icon. Conch. p. 42. pl. 9. f. 23. . [Non Rve.] 1) | ... |Monoceros unicarinatum, Sow. C. I. f. 5.) .....00. = herr ns California. “=P, spicata, Blainy., Kien.=P. en- gonata, Cour.” [v. antea, p. 201.] 1) 2) ... |/—— punctatum, Gray, Z.B. V. p. 124...) ccsseseee | oeeeee Is. Cocos, N.W. Mexico, “=P. lapilloides, Conr.” [v. p. 201.] Capt. Colnett. 6) 39] ... |Buccinum pristis, Desh........cceseccceeesee| ceceeenee | ceeees St. Elena. = 8B. serratum, Dufresne. =B. Northie, Gray, MS. - 6) 43)... |—— pusio, Linn. .........6 Seeceperoccereret (en weetetienn | aisevs Honduras, California. [?] mf] 50)... | —— pagodus, Rue, ............0sessseeeees clefts of rks./ 1. w. Island Taboga, Cum. v.r. _ 3} 10] ... |Pyrula subrostrata, Gray, Z. B. V. pl. 36. sandy mud| 12 |Bay Montija, Cum. f. 15. . =Buecinum subrostratum, Wood. = Fusus lapillus, Brod. & Sow. 2) 9) ... |Fusus* Dupetit-Thouarsii, Kien. ......00.] cesecceee | eeeeee Galapagos, Cum. 16] 61)... Oregonensis, Say= Triton O., Say.| seesesooe | veeeee N, America [? ubi]. 77| sae | ——— Mexicanus, Rve...cccssccsscecetcrssces| seceeeee | eeeaee Mexico [? ubi]. 19) 7]... |Murex monoceros, Sow. P. Z. S.1840...] .sseeecee | eceeee California. 2 ?—M. Nuttalli, Conr. 3] 12)... |—— foliatus, Gimel. .......cscceveeee Pile nace rky. places | ...... Sitcha, Eschscholtz. 24| 98) a,b |—— salebrosus, King. ...eessseccssssseeees under st. |...... Panama, Cum. 28/128) +... |—— horridus, Brod. P. Z. S. 1832 ......] sandy mud | 8-12 |St. Elena and Panama. = Fusus h., Sow. Conch. Ill. f. 29. = WM. Boivinii, Kien. 63. The Monographs of Kiener, in his “ Coquilles Vivantes,” are generally executed with great care, and are extremely valuable for the identification of species. The writer does not fall into the common error of minute division of species: on the other hand, he sometimes unites what will be almost universally considered as distinct. His judgment is not always correct on small shells, as _ when he thinks that Cerithtum trilineatum of Phil. ought without doubt to _ be considered as a dextral variety of C. perversum. For the identification of the Lamarckian species, his work is extremely valuable. But on points connected with geographical distribution, the following list will show that, unconfirmed, it cannot be regarded as an authority. The “California” of French authors, as of English, generally applies to the W. Mexican fauna. _ Unfortunately, there are no dates, by which questions of the priority of | nomenclature may be decided. _ No. Page. Plate. Fig. ; 2 2? 30 = 1. Turbo funiculosus, Kien. [=T. ? fluctuatus, var. P.Z.S. 1855, p. 234.] 2 2 14 2,2a.Trochus inermis [quasi] Gmel. _ 22 29 4 2. Turritella tigrina, Kien. _ 2 36 13 3. Cerithium maculosum, Kien. [Named adustum on the plate.] S. Sea, Acapulco, Galapagos. 26 37 13 2, —— adustum, Kien., non Sow. [Named maculosum on the plate. | Indian Ocean, Red Sea. [Probably correct. | 31 38 7 3. Cyprea Sowerbyi, Kien. =C. zonata, Sow. non Chemn. Calif. 61 59 8 2. Lamarckii, Ducl., Val., Rve., p. 334. Acapulco. [Not so given in Val., Rve. }. ‘133 146 22 4. lathyrus, Dufresne. =C. sanguinea, var. Pacific. * Fusus corrugatus, Rve. pl. 20. sp. 84, a, is said to be= Trophon muriciforme, King, Zool. Jown, 294 REPORT—1856. No. Page. Plate. Fig 138 152 45 3,3a,Cyprea subrostrata, Gray. Isle of France. 5 UP 136 150 52 candidula, Gask. W. Mexico. 9 14 7. 2. Cancellaria goniostoma, Sow. =C, brevis, Sow., teste Kien. Woes! Sia we chrysostoma, Sow. Panama, Peru, Galap. 24 18 16. 1. Pleurotoma funiculata, Val. San Blas. 37°59 23> <4 maura, Val, [=P. Melchersi, Mke,] Mazatlan, Botta. 26 33 15 2 Botte, Val. [=P.incrassata, Sow.] Mazatlan, Botta. 1 sp. 115 139 55 1. Conus Lorenzianus, Chemn. Acapulco, 7 10 4 7,74.Solarium variegatum, Lam. N. Holland, Manilla, N. Ireland. “—8§. cyclostomum+S.Aithiops, Mke.+ 8, tessellatum, Desh.” 18 27 12 2. Pyrula ventricosa, Val. San Blas. 10 19 8 15. “ Cassis coarctatum, Sow., Les cétes du Perou 4 Acapulco.” 1. Ranella bufonia, Lam. Red Sea, Seychelles, N. Ireland, Calif. 13 19 11 2, —— semigranosa, Lam. “= R. celata, Brod.” Panama. 23 31 8 1. -—argus, Lam, ‘“ =Triton Ranelliformis, King, Z.J. p. 347, Var, = Ranella vexillum, Sow. Conch. Ill. pl. 1. f. 3.”’ Chili. 2: anceps, Lam. =R, pyramidalis, Brod, P.Z,8, 1832, p. 194. 22'630) 15) 126 scabra, Grateloup. Peru. : 16 25 16. 1. Turbinellacerata, Griff. Mazatlan,common. Du Petit Thouars. 17 26 16 2, tubercularis, Griff. (A few sp. from the voyage of Du Petit Thouars.) Mazatlan. 25 36 20 1 ——cingulata. [Operculum described. Yet Reeve, after this, places the shell under Monoceros.] 61 98 26 70, Purpura chocolatum, Ducl. Coasts of California. 41,414. .0/00075 biserialis, Blainv. Shores of Mazatlan. 40 64 17 49. bezoar, Bl. China and California. 49 78 20 58. columellaris, Lam. Red Sea and Pacific, Chili, California, «» 81 21 606,—— callosa, var, [= P. triserialis.] 68 109 28 74. —— Grayi, Kien. “= Mon. grandis, Gray.” Pacific. 92 141 44 102. Monoceros lugubris, Sow. Gen, no. 5.f. 3, “== M, eymatum, Tank, Cat, 1888. == Buccinum denticulatum + armatum, Wood Suppl.” Peru and California, 24 23 9 28, Buccinum serratum. [=Northia pristis.] ‘ Habite la Mer du Sud, sur les cétes de la Californie,” Eydoux, 4 2 10 2. Columbella hemastoma, Sow, California. 5 3 1 2, —~—paytalida, Ducl, “=C. rustica, Sow. Gen. f.3.non Lam.” = C. fuscata, Sow. California. 7 10 3 3. ——meleagris, Ducl. San Blas. 9 14 2 1,2. Pyrula patula. [N.B. The operculum of P, melongena, as figured by Kiener, is broader in proportion than that of P. patula,| {He thinks, however, that the species should be reunited. ] 11 15 11 .,,. Fusus Dupetithouarsi, Kien, California. [Galap., Cuming, Rve.] 5 9 10 2. Murex messorius, Sow. “ =motacilla, B., Lam. + rectirostrum, Sow.-++nigrescens, Sow.” Senegal. 3). 43 19 2. corrugatus, Sow. Red Sea, California. 39 55 21 2. ——- oxyacanthus, Sow. SS. Sea, California. 64. In a paper by Dr. L. Pfeiffer, “ Ueber die geographische Verbreitung der Heliceen,” in the Zeit. f. Mal. 1846, pp. 74~-79,87-96, occur the following lists of land shells from the western districts of North America :— Page 94. From Oregon......+++: Helix Vancouverensis, Columbiana, fidelis. 94, From California ...... —— areolata, levis, tudiculata, Sagraiana, Townsend- iana, Californiensis, Columbiana, Dupetithouarsii. 94. From Mewico.......... —— lucubrata, Oajacensis, Buffoniana, Humboldtiana, Mexicana, bicineta, tenuicostata, Dkr,, griseola, Hindsi, ventrosula. 94. 4, 7 Dedalochila implicata. 94535, a Polygyra contortuplicata. “oes = ELLE ALONE EOE API ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA 295 Page. 94, From Central America.. Helix Ghiesbreghti, griseola, labyrinthus, plicata, quadridentata, Euryomphala, quinquestrigata. 94. From Real Liejos...... spirulata, Nystiana. 94, From Panama ........ —— Antoni, uncigera. Many of the species quoted from Mexico and Central America probably belong to the east side of the mountain range. In the same work, pp. 158— 160, are described the following land shells, brought from the Mexican Republic by Liebmann. They are probably from the eastern side :— Page Page 158. Helix caduca, Pfr. 159. Achatina Liebmanni, Pfr. 158. Bulimus Liebmanni, Pfr. 159. -—— streptostyla, Pfr. 158. Achatina coronata, Pfr. 159. Cylindrella Liebmanni, Pfr. In the Zeit. f. Mal. for 1844, 1845, occur the following :— Page. No. 1844. 3 Ampullaria malleata, Jonas. Tabasco, Mexico. 1845. 152 1 Helix Buffoniana, Pfr. Rio Frio, Mexico. poitis DD: kD levis, Pfr. California, Hinds. ete glb4. 7 areolata, Sow. MS. California, Hinds. s» 168 7 Haliotis Kamtschatkana, Jonas. Near Island of Oonalaszka. In the Zeit. f. Mal. 1847, pp. 1, 2, Dr. Menke describes the two following species, brought by Liebmann from Mexico :— Cylindrella teres, Mke. Proy.of Puebla. | Cylindrella Pfeifferi, Mke. Tehuacan. In the Zeit. f. Mal. 1847, pp. 93-96, Dr. Philippi describes the following freshwater shells, brought from Mexico and Central America by Largilliert and Liebmann :— No. 32. Unio cyrenoides, Phil. Lake Nicaragua (Larg.). » 34. —— Aztecorum, Phil. Mexico (Lieb.). Ailes be Mexicanus, Phil, Mexico (Lieb.). >, 36, —— Liebmanni, Phil. Mexico (Lieb.). In the mixed collections of shells described by Philippi in the Zeit. f. Mal. 1848, 1849, occur the following species :— 1848. 19 81 Cerithium(Potamides) Hegewischii, Ph. Mexico, Hegewisch. Resembles ounday varicosa, Sow. [but it is not stated in which ocean it was ; found. 127. 53 Trochus (Phorcus) Panamensis, Phil. Panama, E. B. Philippi. 129 55 Adeorbis scaber, Phil. Panama, Found in Avicula margaritifera by E. B. Philippi. 180 57 Anodonta cornea, Phil. Nicaragua, Largilliert. atrovirens, Phil. a Bi al Nicarague, Phil. a 141 79 Bulla Panamensis, Phil. Panama, E. B. Philippi. 143. «484 Cerithium filosum, Phil. California.—Mus. Largilliert. 145 87 Donawx Panamensis, Phil. Panama, EL. B. Philippi. 149 96 Kellia pulchra, Phil. West coast of America. as 97 Litorina parvula, Phil, Panama, EL. B. Philippi. a 98 phasianella, Phil. _ an 153 7 Mactra velata, Phil. ® », ?“AnMulinia exalbida,Gray.” 163 33. Petricola robusta, Phil. 39 » In Avicula margaritifera. [This fortunately appears to be one of the many forms of Petricole robusta, Sow. (164 34 Phasianella perforata, Phil. Panama and Payta, HE. B. Philippi. 175 59 Tellina Panamensis, Phil. Panama, E. B. Philippi. 176 62 Unio nuculinus, Phil. Nicaragua, Largilliert. 296 REPORT—1856. Page. No. 188 67 Trochus (Calear) erythrophthalmus, Phil. =T. olivaceus, Wood. Cali- fornia. [Described under the erroneous impression that the T. oli- vaceus of Wood’s Cat. was the white mouthed shell. =T. inermis, 1849. Gwmel. teste Kien. ] 148 Trochus Belcheri, Phil. Mus. Hanley. Voyage Belcher. 149 — callichrous, Phil. f RS ‘i 5 150 —— callicoccus, Phil. i ig ‘. Venus. 168 —— metaformis, Phil. 4 Bs iA Belcher. 170 — neritoides, Phil. ms a - +H 171 — nucleus, Phil. ne AA “ os 191 -—— suavis, Phil. Ry 5 34 es 1850. 84 48 Succinea brevis, Dunker. Mexico. 1851 61 73 Buccinum Panamense, Phil. Panama, Payta, EH. B. Philippi. 71 94 Cyrena inflata, Phil. Costa Rica.—Mus. Busch. 74 100 Cytherea solidissima,Phil. California.[=Trigonella crassatelloides,Conx. | 75 2 Donaz obesa, Phil. California. [=D. Californicus, Cour. ] 123 47 Terebra Belcheri, Phil. “... ex itin. Belcheri.” 126 52 Venus distans, Phil. Panama, E. B. Philippi. 1852. 79 13 Avicula (Meleagrina) fimbriata, Dkr. Central America. (?=Margaritiphora Mazatlanica, Hanl.] 1853. 112 40 Lwutraria inflata, Dkr. California, teste Bernhard. In the “ Malacozoologische Blatter fiir 1854,” which is a continuation of the Zeit. f. Mal. by the same editors, occurs the following :— 1854, Page 28. Pyramidella bicolor, Mke. [Obeliscus.] Calif., teste J. W. E. Miiller. 65. The following are from Philippi’s Monographs in Kuster’s edition of Martini’s Continuation of Chemnitz’s ‘ Conchilien Cabinet’ :— Kust. Mart., p. 57. no. 60, pl. 9.f.4. Natica otis, Brod. & Sow. Mazatlan and Marquesas. Kust. Mart., p. 78. pl. 12. f. 1-5. Natica maroccana, Chemn. Morocco, Chemn., W. Indies, Chemn. Guinea, Largilliert. E. Africa,Rodatz. W. Mexico, Pfr. Panama, C.B. Adams. (Var. lurida), Havanna, Sandw. Is., Lieukieu Is., Largilliert. (Var. uni- fasciata), Peru, Petit. 66. Besides the authorities given in published works, the following have been noted from the British Museum Collection :— Sazxicava arctica. Stokes. B. M. Tellina nasuta. Icy Cape. Donax punctatostriatus. Capt. Ld. Byron. Donaz scortum. San Blas. [? ubi.] N. Zealand. Capt. S. America. Tellina rufescens. St. Domingo. Sir R. Schomburgk. Pinna? rudis. Panama. Miss Saul. Chiton, sp. ind. California. Chiton vestitus, Sow. Capt. Beechey. Bulla 2? nebulosa. Pedro Blanco, Mexico. Mr. J. Robertson. Physa elata. California. Dr. Sinclair. Fissurella mutabilis, Swains. Galapagos. Dentalium pretiosum. Central America. Dr. Sinclair. Dentalium, like entalis, Vaucouver’s Isl. C. Ede, Esq. (used by the natives for money). Litorina fasciata. SandwichIs. Lieut. Strickland. Cerithium ocellatum, Brug. Madagascar. (Compare with C. stercus-muscarum.) Odostomia. Monterey. Capt. Beechey. (Probably O. gravida, Gould.) Eulima distorta. St. Vincent’s, W. I. Natica bifasciata, Gray. W.Columbia. Marginella curta, Sow. jun. Mazatlan. Fusus ? Dupetithouarsii, var. Trophon labiosa, Gray. Callao. Nitidella cribraria, S. America. King. Pisania ? ringens. Pernambuco. J. P. G, Smith. Capt. ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 297 67. The following species and localities have also been noticed in Mr. Cuming’s collection :— Petricola denticulata. Mazatlan. Thracia plicata, Desh. W.N. America. Periploma Leana. Mazatlan. Capt. Keppell and Mr. Ede, R.N. Lyonsianitida. ‘China Seas, Belcher :” - probably an error. Tellidora Burnett. Elena, Cuming. Donaz assimilis. Conchagua. Mactra angulata: plentiful from the Gulf, rare further south, teste Cuming. Crassatella gibbosa and undulata. West Columbia. Cardium Belcheri. Panama, Cuming. Diplodonta semiaspera. St. Thomas, W.I. Merk. Lucina fenestrata. Monte Xti, San Blas. Kellia suborbicularis. Is. Muerte (Guay- aquil), sandy mud, 11 fms. Concep- tion, Chili. Salango and St. Modiola capax. Galapagos, Cuming. Heliz vincta, Val.; Baskervillei,Pfr. From California and the neighbourhood. Acmea gigantea=grandis, Gray. Mon- tery, exposed situations. Omphalius Californicus, A. Ad. More ton Bay. Chlorostoma funebrale. California. Ovulum gibbosum, Panama, Cuming. Torinia variegata. Is. Annaa, coral reefs. Lathyrus armatus. California. Leucozonia Californica. Gulf of Cali- fornia, Lieut. Shipley: appears a La- thyrus. Ranella, like vexillum. Mazatlan. 2 tuberculata, var. Mazatlan (Havre Col. teste Powis). Nassa nodocincta, A. Ad. Galapagos. Rhizocheilus asper. Gulf of California. Typhis grandis. California. 68. Lastly, the following have been collected from various sources :— Gray, Syst. Ar. Moll.* p. 52 (Janthinide). Recluzia Rollandiana. Mazatlan. Gray, Syst. Ar. Moll. p. 117. Garnotia solida, genus described. Mazatlan. Gray, Syst. Ar. Moll: Scurria mitra, genus described. Mazatlan. Phil. Arch. 1847, p. 63. pl. 3. f. 7. Am- phichena Kindermanni. Mazatlan. (Appears to be a Psammobia.) Tellidora Burneti. W.Columbia, Lieut. Freer.—Bristol Mus. Dione lupinaria. Valparaiso, H. Babb, R.N.—Bristol Mus. Cardita afinis. Cubaco, Lieut. Wood. —Bristol Mus. Lithophagus aristatus. Panama.—Bris- tol Mus. Lithophagus aristatus. drew. Isognomon Chemnitzianum. Panama, L. Wood.—Bristol Mus. Chiton consimilis. Upper California. Paludina nuclea, Lea. Sacramento River. Anodon angulatus, Lea. 53 33 “ Oliva splendidula. Mazatlan, — Babb, Esq., R.N.”’—Bristol Mus.=O. Mel- chersi. Conus concinnus. Capt. Babb. Purpura coronata. California. Turritella sanguinea. California. Cassis abbreviata. Acapulco. Marginella imbricata. Acapulco. Litorina coronata. SanBlas.—Mus.Nutt. Algiers, M‘An- Bay of California, 69. Having now presented an abstract of all the original sources of in- __ formation (so far as known to the writer), we proceed to embody them in a rf table, arranged at the same time geographically+t and zoologically, so as to _ exhibit in one view as much of the foregoing materials as may be looked _ upon as tolerably satisfactorily made-out. Doubtful species, or those whose _ locality rests on insufficient evidence, are not included. Where the evidence Fis good, but suspected, the name, if inserted, is in [ ]; where it is poor, but _ Gpriori correct, it is enclosed in ( ). Species entirely omitted can be written in by the student, from the foregoing lists, if he is satisfied with the evidence. _ All names printed in the same horizontal line are regarded as probably _ conspecific ; synonyms being distinguished by a single (. _ * Of this work, “Systematic Arrangement of Mollusca”’ (with figures of the teeth of Gasteropoda), now passing through the press, Dr. Gray obligingly allowed me the use of the 'proof-sheets, The main grouping of the Gasteropoda has been followed to a considerable extent. T_In the second column, A. signifies 4sia (chiefly Kamtschatka and the Sea of Okhotsk ; , i: ted Sea. In the last column, E. signifies the coasts of Eeuador and Peru; C. those -0 ts luk ook . Se a REPORT—1856. 298 “sobvdnj0y seesleceere nung *VNOYVA TVOICOUL “(woraxoptyeg) |e “epiqre|"*** ae ae ps abe omen aeereeee “TISURA TT ‘VLVIHONVUAOITIVd 810 “UMOUYNL) ‘VIVOINILL §¥10 eeqeoraqut||er sess eseeeeees “ds “eu0so[oso “sromojaxytided ao veeeenereree aecsleenceecereeesrseerlerersenes nnaseees “ds * essordpe “St[farMy *stdoro0ddry “e10dimais1em1 “24214801 VolUepezeyN ~esourdstt} “BOSNjO1ye ‘ds eee etenpeneeerees “201303 “ayeTMorpap]|eerssseeeresesssee|seeseeeeesensrssealeenteceensnenerens “membo fio) mymbofinoy mgnto fi) 8 fo fimy 4amotT waddyQ woleug ‘VNOVd NUGDHLUON “"VOZOAUE **10 *eUdTUvO) ceypupapnd| sss saeees ** pyngnagadaL spaoeyqted yluhyy * WAITTENOHONARY | “pyauoya | seareeserveveverssleemgmliaypyD dy + WATIALVUATATY, saseveccvoccesseaelscecen[eosers onbwy : €atTOONI'T eeereeeernecere eeteeeronerenere seer et eeeerores eee eee ewerewetoes everleeeres sevrcesewesleeeemtersees DUIISIT > HW AINIOSI(L ed psodyngny :# aiaodl Toga J, “nounifeg, ? #AVMOAOOSICT ““puodayay : ¥AixOda119) “psauab re a) US pue vuauazyy ‘SALTINV ‘suorstarg’ 409260j007 ‘VOINTINV HEINON JO LSVOO LSaM AHL FO VOSATION 299. ON MOLLUSOA OP THB. WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERIOA. “TTe}INN ettced TyTe}RN Gree WeHUN "ILO PCTTOC SCO SESS Sr SSE TEEH EE eEEe THI "EV r “BojUUSIS| =" y|snmoperng “ds *eye1exa *sT]oJ-eNSuly -emnozedned *Ba0BT]O} j *BADJ[AULE]|""* VLOJIPJOUTUT|*eereees*eeseeeeseleseeeeseewesseeraalarsees “puunyadngy “eurjepsAure Bivipe=cocmmreseecenocge” ves vyeud00 Pececcerceevcceees sTuIOsIpejoyd aftestttreseeesesesebeeeeeereepagnqoa}ssestesseesereseeeleeeeeeeee@agngog ‘ds a PA PRE ateeea ae Late POPS COPE EH EB eee tH Fi naeeeeneesereOEeetings BSOOLIJUOA = “eyelnoruep “snpAyoep]| *BOTUIOMeO|*** BIIUIOFTTVD | | “eaovapurAo!**: eaoeapurfso|"** waovapurpéo ! | “BQQIa|**°*"|*** Mj00LMag : WALTOOTALAT “7 seeattome Peeeeeees gimtigg|rerseceeeresereeeeleevens wopemay SIPBO || ***** StpepOyg| ss eereeeeesleee sipepongg "y|"" Vevawng :wWaLAVOIXVS “eurTeAy, *SIAOIq} “eso[n gna} eveccels 1 7 seve eee VIVA" ost reeeeeewererfecceeeres Bayagl puny | "I PTeeT ITIP IT yy ee! eyeounsy eereeeesonaeereselessace eyB0UnLI} aOR OOS Oe reer eee nee| EEE o ee HSE OEE EHH Goer eeeeseseeer ses SPP EbSEEFsssogeteslaceeee "O04J80) : WCINWHOOULSV) t ! “BYBPBOTAYUL||*erreeereeeeressee|accenssessersevecelescsseeeseevenssasltrsvessavcccnsserelesenes s 89° D892 4D IT “BYBUTUINOG|***** shee teeeeee tone eyeUroINdB *eATeO secesenere seeeeeeeeessBArgy “BOTUIOFIeD eee BOluIO;T ey BO CCHOP OF eeeeeeees -AGBOEDSEACRUTICO Se ateees “* sppoydning rapcretceeeeeseseredterees Brortany *82.1Nnd Peeteeves e4y1nd q “a severeestorcegerer Ro Pees eerereereeereriosseas einuelaul *BOPIOAO “egttiad|**sress++ wyrtad|serseessereseesseelereeserereesseeseelereeeslees pamemm one ‘ds Z , eseydopix : "a Perec tenesessensselsesees Jes1on19 eeoeee JeS1onJ0 | “BOUIOD|***eeereserseverse|fessevssarccrossannalgoccsgsnreneseseeslneseetartanacnncas BSRenASR: ean hEva Faeseee aances 80]0Yq : waldv'10Hg ee ee ee eee ee | ee ee WLVIHONV ASI TIS 810 . REPORT—1856. 300 “sipdeay *esomenbs ‘ds Z “BaIqni *esoroads|****** wsoroads “a Seeeeeneroeereererieeserenre . SIUIIOsIONU *eyeIped “sae “eye1OWIEU ee CC CR “POULAIOg “esoourjuaal******** *esojnjsnd|** spp tteeeeeesenceceealeeneeeeeeapmag|** igiteereeseereeedereses prerpemta|* BSOOLIJUOA ** gsojngsnd ByBpNAo|****** VyelMAOZ ByeIpearq|****** Byerpesrq “esaqo esaqo "+ -Bsaqo “smuay|"* + smuay|sees* smmag rig |ttteeeeeeseeeeeeoeleeeessonpariporg|***** BqBULIBOIQ|"*****ByVUTBOTG ‘ds z “eumoroAtod saeeres *sT]RUOSLIy “eyeyUl “stpenbee POO e meee eee terres sees eesereeeessens ‘ds Z ssiey *vuIqoos ‘VY 'S| ‘sobndyny ‘nunung | ‘vaweup “7D puto fing *D “eprytu)|*** BorUrosTTey 24804081q POPC O HOT H eH EAH eos eeriseeeee pisuohyT PEETULIVOTT TTT ee Cd eeeleseeetloessee vsaghy, *eqano FOC eee meer eeeeee se seeetsreeerereee SOS eesionseee DIIDAY T, : WCINILVNY evessersasseereeeleveres Coansetr] Perrier) ++ [eqeurreorq | | se eeeeeereneseress **-emoiqoAjod PPTTeRTTTE Ge Ce 2yngtog sevnsascsseseacces|sscreestacsssseeslesesesunsvassncemelsrssseeneosessensleeseeelersnAUOUlDIOg : FAITALUOS | *BOIUIOFLD vee vOTULOsT[eD deere cece eeseesers[eereeeseesseeetanelsessealeesesreee niuoydy “TTe}INN ere eg uopozdhty *eyeT[aoUed seeesepaprTTaouUo Serer og see uopohjnd *BUITXPU see eeesesenrsceeeslsssene eUIxeul eaeeeslensseeces DIMDLgNT *pso1guas sores emer ereeseaslseseasieasereree podoupg *estowid eeterer st eeereeses "Ve *eLIVUOTe ‘Vv see eesecevenens vi : WaVAN seeeeeleentes | PPEEEET LETTE) Creer eee (orupsnyy é : WAITOOULAg) ———}| << | —$—$— $— — _ —$_ ——————————r ‘ououpy =| "Dis *suowsiang 100260007 musofiny "7 |*musofing | - ‘uobaig 301 ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERIOA, , “ernyuepal''"* emnquape ‘ “ds “TUULMIOpULy “soprouly[e, ‘eoindimd)}*"*"'* eyeturur *SUd0SB[OIA *SIULgU PPP) sturge “ds “snqrjod *stpni “suo JjIAeAq “eqnU109 “eyBNOIAR[O | POPS Tere eeetecseael seseceeesesseesoes see eeeess BaBISOD “7 PPP CO “BULApIp| sstetsestseeeeees “eye ‘noovrdded *BqBAINDXO *emnosntueyd “euva'y *euvqderp see ceceeroereorensisecses gueqderp *(eqR] “B[Npr[os ‘av “goam ‘'T'V ‘a ‘av pUylal, “BOYTOU | teeters seers sefeeeeseeenneesesseeleceereneeesseesesslenwoesl s9ems guns T eeeeee ByeIUT “TRIN “vyeIperorqny “sIpueia *SNUBIMIOFT[eO|*“snuUBIMIOFTEO "BURIUIOFEO| tess seeteoeee+lpecppounbung : WOINKTTEY *SaTOJQUS|****** SAIIGNS|****teesteeesseesfeeeesseseessereeeleeeeesl seen a ungazoy “eprony “THBWNN |" TPN *SNUIIXBUL *B484S09/"GV|“VMYyIoy > WAILUDIATOG *SIILIGDIG|**tereestersereere|seneveleresersesese gorge : CINATOS *eyB70UNd Coe eeresseeseneees POP ee eeee ree eeeeesiceeesesesssrsesees “RITEPMOD.IE] steeeeesseesereee “TLe390.N, soseeepaord Peer eecertrcenrss[saseesessestovoues seeeeeteeeeeescces seveeeces [ejord] ttenecvagcenseaeeelecceeclessees MLQDUDT sa eeenecseecvaesssleacceelsasseses sm sQAT See eeeseeeeeeeeesslccccerions puojdiad ns enn herenl* seceseles nuaumnuhyy } REPORT—1856. $02 "V 'S| ‘sobndnvy *SLISOILAGAg|"** SLIISOTTARIG eer errr rs Peer eqjand nSarumng) "+++ nSurump|****+* WFaraM9 eoorund tedeeeres raqutog’ vfs gamumga ‘ds ¢ “ey eTNOyWap “e[nyeorep “278 [UIE] “sLepn3ar *B{[oBaop, *eauIUIeI}s “ndireporg *BOlUL[JEZE IN, “eulmled *emd Be acecerseeveeeves sereeeresose pind seecescowens DINE asi*** sereseeermnggs eeneeee ***°B10908 ‘sisuadapog|"** sisuadepog *BOIUIOFTTED *(eyeumbur) BTISUTT| Perret este teeeeee|seoeeeees eqnseulses'*'* eInsen ‘TV *99*(QUmaT, : WAINITIAS) ‘oumung | “nawaup “Q |mruiofyng “1 \\ nrusofyng "7 | vrmsofyng ya | ‘uoba1p ‘uD Ds; *suowsrar(y 700360j007 303 ON MOLLUSOA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. “T speeseeerereverecelecesion eryoind : “eyeueyd “enbiqo *BSOn}10} *BSOLI}S *eultxoad “vor diya *10[001q| *eSOOLIQUOA "7 POCO O deere eee rest reer ener seeess eee ter eensesreseseseatserees BISNUVA ¢ “BOTULO;ITeD *sudoSoARp! “eee *STQOSOART “BSt0ep “ByBoUTOIgN. PERCH CeSeSETSEPeselecese sees eee tesetsleeeeseesssereseeeel te teee “B,OUIPIPLTTA | “eyonpoid seesenterecvecceeassresee eyonpoid eoececosee is *stremsuerq|’*** POPPE rere) Cy Pe ee 7 POM eee eee Oe OPE eee TEE EOO see est oseree sere eer ee ee eeeswonl rereee Young -eqoun(sip “B1Q0UIS *el[TAT “eu10} 0901p *StULIOsIstd “enorque *BlIeuIed seveee VLIVUIeD CO CPD euleqry ecerleeecesces e101d seesereererereseerlees BITTTBISATO seesesseneeneseensls SUStIoTgUInIO/) ‘ds ¢ *Bysney *eSI9} *eOpoyt *SISUITUeUe ‘misoAvysoqy “enbris "eUUTOTIOD <“Byeu300 * *BIOIME steeseeronauuag “DLL NIVGOUDE *" DOpUAL sees pin brags ee ed REPORT—1856. 304. '"V '§| *sobvdmuy ‘ounung | ‘vawaup *g |wusofyng “9 || ‘mutofyng "7 | viusofiyng | ‘uoboo ‘ayo4p = sy ssuomszargy 7092601007 ae NN | es SS SS eee “ uopoyzouy *snorpueut||* *ejsnsue *ByRIULOR] *RYCIOA “sueSaya|*********sueSaqa|s******** sueSaqa *eqepnduel*''* eyepnZuel-''** eyeynsue sesesesenpqgqoxa| ie rteteeserseretes|sseeeee*= BagTOXO “BOLULOFT[eD “sIseay “eyelUod “eprted “Tl eco eseecarereees *eqnseul *eyernueld “BOTULOFTEO ; *BYVOTRI *(steao)(q°yit''** wugonyy + WALALOVIN, *sISuoMBUed “VUITeAO “eTTeq * Blnoraeuy**** -eMolweu ** Sipruuisse]****** STTLOUIsse *sngeutieo|"***** snyeUlIeo ‘Ipeiuoy|"***** Tperuog *snyeLtsoyejound *SNSIOASULI} traquadieg errr errr s**** STqRIISOI *enoraeu|" *SI[TUIIsse]” eeecereeereseeneee sereeeeee STTIOBIS ssteeeterensseereseerers gnqBIaSOI *snsaqo)|*** SnOTUIO;ITeD “SMSOUKOG|tetetertessseees|eeceeeeeneeesseses|seseasl ceeseeees POUOCT "7 aeeeeseeeseeresees seeeeeeeeSTTTOBIG tresses ecTTTIOBIS *snyetysor eee eo “a Peete eee reaeaaaree sere et one tole eeeeeeree 101}[28 ee ereteee 10132 Prt Ce Cc CY bc i owuabydy : #aI0ovNOg eUglrsrseececeesesreeelecesecsesecs ‘ds “7 ee oreerereesvecsesisee SLIVNUOSLY see eeerseseseeeeesiere sLeMUuosiy Sry |paneedeaeseussoes see BsOTauley|"***** BSO][OUL] s+" BSOTaUIR] *VOLUIOF[VD eee voIUIOF [eg eee vormzose) PET TTT TL Ce ee nibuwng *munyejound *umnidna PPPTTTETETT Terrie CITT tr a ee Pe) ed be (aqjamag : WAINITID) — ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 305 “Te ei CC ee) pre Pe eerereneistteee Bis) (4) 000] *eqe100[NA “erqueime)****** emnueine a | Rn! Cone eprenbs) ***+*-Baerpetq) *Ba80l|" esonyq103 “sume euutouod|"* Orr ry * xeyduuts) "ltertteeestteeseerleeees ung] “euyuazie ‘ds z *eTayepun “eyelet SISUAIUIOsITED “styBryoojod * eqeIoUA sees BUBINe “eee -BeeUOTyO tees Bgor ** ‘euuroU0D +566 BaeuTadTO “"** errentdny “esoutdstaoiq *--eqerpenbqns “ ToyuNg “* Bsorapuod ‘Ruy “reese Baemnueld sree eaprpel “°° BoTquagIe “stay, *[Saproyjayesseso ]|| sapro[azessezo| soproyjaqessero SIsMoIUIO;TeD *redstp *edeagyong vy “RUIT][IUUS "eYPAVIKA “1230 eeeece Tey P "eplsia}s* eprSi ‘ds *eyerdure| EPC) (ch) *(saploqreysy) |g sta 4 PUMA SWicAssela\esiavieleaue Aes saessuas| usleeesivevedsv duce) cuaxnediavecweeeen leracerl tenets vasayghy teeter Ott O treet secre esse neeteeaaeleneseeeceesteccece Cer eeesseeeesesseesieseeee sereeereseeouore TP OO eee e eee tere eel eee a ea esereeesseenlsesestaneessseceen OOP cee reessseenceelerseselsoseseses puyoho *eso]yeo|"* eel eee reseseoeeeseees|serseslecereveee muisog 1856. Pe Coo seeesenuobiny ERO Ree email . “eygniey| + —— rE COREG marae oo ee ater He Sn eS SoS Pea *suonbaazut PO eee seeeersceersisgs suonbayur “eYeULIeD ee *s1]80100 “U[TAPOTMO|*+-teeeeseeeeeeceeeeeees seeeeedeeeeesleemuag mato, BOON] "eres teeeleeeeee BIQOTANT||" teeeeeteseceeeerlesseeseeeeceseeceslecgescesnsenestees|sessensssessceesss[enceeelens puyoylig : WCINHOITAD *stumrojrquiso “eINOIsaA , "US|trterceerecsssveceleceers “8s MaUNUUD ET *sliqejoyny *ds “sIsuaTeUe gy ‘eyernjound|*** eye~njound ‘Isuepy|'*"* Isepy “mf0nd) Cee eer cancers covcee|seseeesececeseseediscuescees tifond ‘ds "uyeree ‘enbursuo] “SUdOSIIIA “esornqaul|****** esopnqaul’***** BSOTNGaU|***+++ee+++ seroydeoayy|| sts erreeteeeeee Peters tet eoeteteees DNT * Warring DOO OeoO gang Sennen rns o- pyaupbosug ; WCINITIHG “STTRAO!****eo ete tteeeeceiocssccccraccssercelivecresccscccvevess|saaceersscessteasleescccessccssssenelecvcoecsscsceecers masque) : WaIHONVusoNnaTg : “BV erouVAq4d97, |’ TE Se SES Go eit Sn LS eee es ee eee “eaoesorqns “STULODISSBIO)******}""*******nuagnpT “eutuoay|*** steseeleeeeereen mason “ds “ds *ds . ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. "BIVOUIA]"****+|eererseeeee suger : wallow ‘sugosatoqie| *ylenzouodpuag : waVINOLIYY, REPORT—1856. 314 —— — =_ cat rt Oa *snuvorxay|'*’ SnUBOTXeyH “a OrrPr Te a sdoourid) seecceres BIqeZ VS *sobodnvy “119]8217, “e1oyTNUUe “eyeord “exadtoun|‘eyeyuaptpenb “Tuo JY euetyshN “Byenatds *euvdqiaMos : “esnyqo TrTveT eee “puDung “pawaulp "9 | ‘DrUso, fin “9 “romped Preeee Te Td Ce Or Po a ‘nung *esoulsnIa *eULTeIseS "eq RTTIOOA *SIAQ] “eyeUIn FUL “TisIenoy edn “BURIUITTOIN “24 POLIO] “J 0UIA “eyepoore|****** ByeTOoIe *SISUOTUIOJ[ED|" SISMOTULOFITEO, 'euBIpuasUMOT] BURTPUISUMOT, “euBIquIN[Og]"** eueIqUIN{oD “eqye[Nopny|"** eye~Morpny}******eze[NoIpN}y TyQTPY Ce 1TH *eSOIqe] “gisuaUOBarg| **sttrreeetstene|ttees tienes ‘a ‘wyapy WAIOTTA}Y “DIsSp “mrmnbofyng 7 \"mutofiny ‘| *suoissangy y9260j007 sds “TSseSplig *snyeouy Ly) *ststiasd0qey, *sTjeudeys 315 “sISMOUIeUe | “suonbaryut “snUUION09 “sngnoe ‘SMODBATIO||"**"** SMDBATTO]**estetesestereses|eceserseeresessnaelerseececseeseselesereslenonMupany : WATTNOIMAY *eqensu10 *ds|***stsuatoda1Q *SUeOT}SNI Pee resee rene re taesiseecenions paurony “eUeISUIUINO FAP Ree Omer eeseoenlissrerr seco et OPOEsl OOS e oat F One rH sees oesaeernseneeseseslesesesereseseneseeletsens DUN18,0U40,7, “TUB A *sntiesedey[ey “emmonu *snaozisnd *snyemmjdjnos *snauoo Soplozjmurey yD ‘Tqooer “SMLATeO *snye[nysn *SnqesseIUl shulpeuyeqoy TLULA.TB(T “snAagLIeyOs| *snsomn3nd “sngeloseyman, *SNSOON.LIOA *xnu *10jooTUN “UN [TXeA “sugon[sue ‘guocomnad *snjeuay[e *snqeliquiy ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA, a oe ee — SL, Pere er eri ee “pueIpuElfoy||*eesete tet? sresleeveemezmaagy *ByeT[ODEp|| * pyUniays||steseeeseeeteseee|seeseseecateeeeeeslecssecsencesassesefessserencsenenenesl senseless muaygUDT t OINTHINV] “epodo10j0 7, “VLVIHONVUAOSOUT *“uNnT[e4nNo8s “einvul *eord|" *ByBISOD)"**"***** BIBISOD omp|resosseee se313 seereesee seai3 seeeeersseeeep Sig teeeeceesees ag ail|trttetttteeteeecesleotoneserseee seeveeeeveeleoeres TIMIUBOR] “BYBIITIMDAR||**eeeserrrerssewelevseecereeeeeseeslecsseraaeceeceeene|sersesensnensecesslengees manuoydig : #AVIUVNOHAIS *sIsuoteutg *smouUn} *snquopoes3 ‘uomme *stIzjnotedo|"** strepno1edo “snyeuaroqns *snjuandoo gtepnotunroa|* st ettteteteseeeefeeese|*+ + -seguounp ‘ REPORT—1856. *e4e]9 “BIgUING eye SIAl********* BVSIUA| Re “BOUISIIA *eSO1ONY ‘ds MBA TPE anes th sane *apaan|nnexnn mseeseeh pshiyg *esoiquin|****** esorquin *ROUISNILOT “CURT Te} N eutoide “epiday seseseeeeneesseseslevsvesleesers mOUUIT ? WCIHNWIT “eqemnsue SO emeesereerenesrs|sceessaseserenseeel | cosesetersecceeresieesstseneessessreslestnsesssenseneses[ertecsssenssenseesissenselene sadipag : (warTAoIUay) 'V 'S| ‘sobvdnjvy “DUuDUuDg ‘naWMaUp "Q \nUudofyng “9 || viusofing “7 \nimsofyn9 “A u0batQ ‘Ouodpy =| "DIS *suowiarg 100160j007 316 —_——__<<[_K__eeeaxaveSeaSaQaQQ =. / :.-.00CCCC...... *SUQ0SOART “19808 5 "STISOOSTIUM| “**t st tet eeeeeeeelserenslenaees UuoztyD “eqye[NUaI0 317 “TIsaq1oy “eqwaUT| teeter fees wagon *SIUSISUI “WYO “TZqOYOsyosH *SISUOTOIIS “THypuBIg) “yy a201UaT, ‘Vv *sntidoad| *sn4v[norqox0s “IISU9q19 7, “SOPTAT] wopryooprdaT “7 FO eee eter sereeet es lseeesesstenerssees **“SIOLIOFIOVUITT eee snoumn3ues “Tuva g | ‘BOIpUy,W *snje][nq| *sniqeayye]o *SISUI[UPBLIA| |" 'SISUOTEPSVYA[| sss sseee es seeelecseeeeeceeweeeceelesececeeessesewneeleneres snunajdopiday “T Peereererreseeesetlces snyjeyomnd “SMOUTPSA UY eeeeseeeeseseeed +e ee4] +e og eyaON07 *snyeons “MTBPOOH *redstp *SNYVSIAR] “srsomenbsojei13s *snqvaurfoq[e *snqejnoryre rgfterrtrssseeteesseeleeseee qrggnogg|essttstttestereesleeeesseceesseees||eeceeetsresecenaee|ons [nsax039] teteneeverseessersleccsaperescesereslscerselone gash doT : aINOLIBO “ey eIOUBIQINIG “7 POC eer eeerstocseesisssegerssessecesss *unuoZeressa} “wansorjead|******wansonord : *TUNGeSNAL00 “mnuryedy , *wny eT] ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. edsi****** pomarodi******i*** eanwpzuay tS a { } s MATL J rte | boat acd | - . a —)" a = - i. = —s = i = I REPORT—1856. *eyemdys “ds wetereeee s100stp seeeteees 81008Tp *snnorpad|****** snfnorpad “q| -toyrarpunary , ogfsrur] trtttst*|-ee-+* sisuanoyy *snyvoul] *snqvitye]o “sns0qas “essoout) *ejordap *sITIquysut ‘TuUSy Peete tleweeee DIJAIDNT . Serene eee eeeeeeresleveesereereserseesleseunseeeressssoeel sees spp POR RO ee eee eee eee Heer eH EEE HHO E OHH eee ee eet SEESESOHES seers sesesesseteeeleeettsleanree 1220, ! WALTIALY, a xo DN “sijelo *sLIBpndor “mB9MgI10 HY stsuaho10} U0, *SITULIStOD *sngnoe *SNOTULOFI[eO “TTE}}0N ‘suatyuOp *snsousy] Trysuassousom| THYSUASSOUSO AA |******|\yapue DLaUay “"T PRTC E EH OE HHH eee RESET HORT SENSO Ee oeeesene® esnqol PTETTEIETER EET eT ee ee eee eee ery “-paoydixuad *saqtuoseITy “HSpuly *sISMaTquIN[OO}) rgp|teesseseseeseseree]eeeeeeeee gE] seersenensleeereopmonrquag| setters seseaenees “pUnung ae paaupy "DQ |*myulofyny "9 *119][948 ee L9T]948 ever enne 119] [948 "y|wopryoopdheg *wise[snog “eyvoruny, “valoulemqns| “y\""* vu2ayzny seseesanevesentene|sseerscscessceenealecsereeaneseterenelecseesansnenenente] esses egg gOYpUDOP “Pour “muosduitg “eursodso POP oeeterrerenseaeleseeeelesenes vyndoyy TUTTI TILE Le eed eed eed Pee (woz249 : WOINOLIHD) “musa fing "7 | nyutofyny 1) uobasQ ouaup = |"wasyy| —-“suorszancy yvorboj007 ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 319 “BULI}SO *snul “eporeqqra “q| 8yej;0UndorSra) eye,0undozstu eqej0undor3iu *eU91}0108UL|*** VULe1}0108UT|*** euIET{OI108UI *BUIAA,O10IM|*** eW914010TUI *BUBOIX9 I oe eeeeeeee “+ [eueransag] *“SUQDSOTIA|"***** tse * SUa0SorIA *esoSni Seeresererecvcres eee esosni ‘ds “esolsuods “eqye “B,0UID0IS1 a) OP e ee rereoersrocel sees resecssneseesleseessesesssesccee em] Cee eeccseres *B4e]]9}8|-07S801u03a;ued *SaPIO][a0IAeU OO eee re ry eslece ‘ds ¢ [eaovjora}}-**+*+|* pyaunseyg : waIT TAL ASSIg TSP e eel ee eee es ee tenths eee seecesseseeseesess eeeeee|**eene muipoy : WaVINIGVY ere eecrccesssleeesesisce Duyjagnag erytun)********* Bay 100 seecrecee CIZTUL|***ss+e0e CAG INN we esee DiAinay 9 See eereeecsesesves Pe eevevesereelissccssces “Ryo TUN *SUQ0S9AT] “BUTZTOUSOA|*t+eestteeeeeeseeslons euryiadsoa *SLIB[NOTOSET “ByeL48/""* BONsTOSeuT ¢|*** evueyderp)|"'* vonazosaut “eqeos|" “sIpuelg * eiqeos tecceceee eiqeos 1pueigs sreeoeeen TUBS *ByBLIqUg “BOT x4 *euOsiod||****** evuossod|*****" “eyad [vorpuepezeyy] SOOee eer eeesoee rela nerseeeeeeeecses ie a *IO[OOISIOA *[sueries | smystug| sees ertesteseses| essere grat *smBun|******** smuZun *BadRAT[O|""*''* BadPATIO *(snsopun)}|" *erodtmenbs|"** vradtarenbs| QMLMA|"steseeseeeeeeeesdeeeteseeesseeeeens *e]jaueiseyd "uunsoxes|****** tunsoxes sa|trreesteeetstesesseaeenneeseeseenesdsseseressoesearresleres TINSONJONY “7 steer teeeenetrscesleonces vye10jzad se ceeeserees eeleccoce eyeroysod *eydm100 Sr tT | eae Co REPORT—1856. *COLUL [EZ Peter eet eee eens eeeenaeeseaeeaeees “7 ore rer rrr ry seeeeeeoestrenD *RIOFIUOIO “7 sreeeoestren Deut Peewee eeeceseesoas|eetseerr® vord) teens syenbaut spype|teeesreiteeteeeesleereretees pare *vIndsqo “stTqeynu Prverreeee ere irre *sIsuotaeUe | “paaUlp *O VS — -sobodmpy 320 “punung “pUdofyny “9 se ew * snsoyyy"'**'*** snso[y “snurydiz17 ) “snyepNUUE| "sss sngUpNUUE|s*tersseseeeeesese|eerees|seeeergn ada sreleee praryung *snsoyg}***** TES TTUT TILLEY Lee Ce eee er Sebo eeleeeeesenceseraeee wee susopun oyunay ** epNDULOT see ttensleneeee deen ee reese teseeenleeetttaseserene eee PTeeeeEe TCE ere rere Creer errr ee eer eee es Cee eeer reer errr ire rr) 88 OQUMT, sheeee TSayxHOq) sees soy OJ) ttt ee seeeeeartteeslene [nsox 0,7] *--numodoyn9 seeeeeeespa oro Pence rere esseeeees seeeeeseepad 100 se eeeeeeseneeetene seers | aUDIsDY J Oe meat tenatenene *(Bueryyeyos;uEy) “““naqnUojg ¢ * WAIHOOUY, *IIporayoRID *SISUOTUIOFIRO *suapualds "** TIporeoRsg, * SISUITULOFI[ED *****-stapuayds eye 3nI100 *suaosayni eee PeCeUeOre Terrie eee ere eer err rere rere rere irri eee nny “nyealed “Byey[nond Cee e ee eae eeeees et tane * DJaANjoUNnT Paton eterereerslttteee popyjasns. its Sear ereeereserslessaenlene purdpanT Tener eeeaeneeeseslamasausssaaerssessl|sesagessseesensee "BIBMUITO]"eteteeseeeee *TUpoouryT “eyAYALIOISUap)|""*** BIpTEIO)| sete" eradse|******|****** sxydhpp rere e eee eee ess eee re Terr err ree erv err rererird trie ssl (paMnssyy : AUTTTMOSSI) “musofyny "7 | ‘vruiofinnd ‘uobaQ ‘oyoup | Ds “suorsiarg 4091601007 ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 321 *soprloorjeu “B7B[NLULIeO "2400 “eyeTnuue “2480100 “BI UOTFIG “e9e91q “eyeapenbqns 878/011] *B.LOJT[IUOUL “si[TUOUL "BJUSSNOp||*teereeeeeseess Otome ee eee ten coset eauncccesseeeeeavalersseseucsseaeessslessens ** pyjaursje4 *BIU09SO][e0 “yearns “eyelys| "Ww "eoore) W*np2unbuvpy “e7ej00p Ce eeeevaasscersces CeCe merece ed ecesceleccccersersceneseslonevusenecevoccece Pere eereeesesereeelssrecs “"“pyuophiog *sn[nqols *snqe[naty *snyemoryo.r) Steer eee eeoeseaseelessece Bee “snsosny *snj0UT}0aIN¥)***snjourjoarmne *snsojnoeul *snyeulsIVul “suadsa0sny “Moped *SNTEYAUIOAIMA||** +++ +++ +eseeroeee snjeyduroAana *SlSOUl Seceee STLJSQVUL] ** e+ + se eevee tl eeeeee snysaour! *snysopoul|" **-snypy dug “BINgqQLD ** mnbay, Ceeseeseresaseees FeO e eases esl ear eee ree naeeessesless “ej e[NUoI0D Ce ee errr ry Stqued1as-stjad|styuad.tas-styjod|+*++++*+-++s 1948 ewerteles *TISLLIONT| St tsttseeeeeeeeelons “sIsSuomIvUeg BULTT| (str tee eset teesleeceasssceseescens *snuea'y Sceccececcceelecssccece [eur] *ds gIsuanURUtd | “SIqto | -eqyeadsouryd seen e tetra teasensleassewraersteneres| pyuofyng "T | nIeLofy7a “1D enneeeeeteareeesealrrsreserseossasesel seers ieeeees DULZIMAAT Tet enter eee weeree i te eee et nenenee Ate ee ee ene neme Pete e teen et en eee? sence eeeeeeeeeenee ""* seguoapp +se+|+U0980U2AT, seers’ DYOURT “ §N9NQOID é DUGOUT sereeeees grda\y + WAWLIUAN esesaesevetesersfeseeestesessseseesdeneeslene (py auntges 1 Q1HO0¥ J) ——— uobatQ ‘yop | ——- | —_$_—_$ _—.-. ‘pispy| *suorsrangy 400260]007 Bia ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA, 323 OO “"""Bipuale por | coseiesuoseriocstter ‘+ Tereyertp] “ss e@aesIop “** sTULIOjINgun ete poate Sea sineie vielen AT “"* BIBABIXO POC e etre ccasetnas *esosn.al steeeee-BA OUT “**"**-Bammouyl********ea Mout eyvaTNIe|"* Bjealnoe seeeee eyeaqnoe teed ececeseseseelessece eqeaqnoe} see eqem3uy)< orocttteseeeseddecssessogoum gl teesarsinguasiaval |"*"71°* epyas)|*-sraxtog1a4s02) “eqeurldxa b| ‘ds eee ea seeeeees*BanNUIUL “7 weet ee ccessasecees | | | *RSOOLIQUOA “eyed “snxapoiqns *eeeeeee een oTOd “8 **Sn1 100 sees **"**snoTu09 tee ee seeeseceseeee la *“SErey[LUroren ** shreypyonuren See eecseee (Osea doceceserece [streyramaenr] teeeeeeeescoprrp al “sngerarysey se eceereseessecnes seeveslens snsayDy A et eeeeeseeceseree ea0eda0 oer e eee eeetessesslesnens eo0Rdeo ete eesseesesccsee Pee re ee eerecessnee “TANqeLIAS; canyvorquat)*** uunqeorrquiy “** UONnqeoriquaL | “Ty}aMer ee -> =< |e wnreust]) teeeee unsourds “"**" umsourds|****** wmsoutds *eprydoydro eungngranst;) : ELV "[ereeesees manaMAT ? WaIOIUV NT ilo eat VERT SOY | SS paeiaitn pt ach os ayeTweraTam02 : ~ = REPORT—1856. 324 *gUILOJLIQe]S “UIUITOLE} * mIneUIy verre TANQBpUn *manjzerpenb “TAN yeAYYeO “unssord wiqns *cnjzeduola *TINyeULIY, *canqyeanbe } ; “unuose}doy *TINJOUINOJ AT] *unsnyqo *9[BUuLIOUge *ayeaidsqus “mnydnosul emferydosoeun| teers euseiydoi0e wl “sIsuatBUe ‘ds Z “epiqie seyzoquoa| eres ettteterette [tt ses wyt0gt09 “HSpurH ‘snaumaga “11w018q)|"* SnapenbiyU90)"" snapenbiy090 mnIe}WedAeOl ‘ds *eynIy [-ersaudjog}|"**""* snzeqzeq “snqeuryld “7 seeeeweeancareeer® ““sisuolBueg ) seers seceeseesereeteesleoeees gngequeq pee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeel eters sujeuryd Pere os snyenbyue *SNYBLIOS *snueferg|****** snyerpes)|***** Snuedeiy sores snuesBiy, *epIpsos “7 PTePTETT Te sijeulgiew eee ery Ps Ce eee seutofyny *) ‘py 's| “sobvdnjvp “pUDUuDg “DIbIUp “2 “amyetnsns109 sesoeaveevesresese sete neserenerernas eulse1qdo10eul Prove ree eet eeeeeeeneeesees *sniaStmenbs eeteoesee seeeessnuehely “pyoto fd *T Prerrerer Terre ri tr sew ew ee eaneee mone ae eeeeseoreseaare® weet eee neaesereane 7 (| Coa PrereTeeeeeerr ries ee PPPPT TEL ee ***snaadtuenbs|**"*****" PPPPrrererrririrrrs irr seer reser eneressesiooesoasorreseerens PPPTT TTT ee ‘musofyn) “u0baiQ weneee “8 UNNIAD TL = reseedeeeees sunpaupy POET UEETE Ee unnguny dary "UNIDD > WAINWD | seeee"\8NYIU0I0IDJIg seteserearernseeneleorersle sn dhpboddy eee eeeeseeeeeesees saenscecerseseecseleneserlseeess DINOQIT seeseslene sngausdag sajayy : WOILAWUI A | aeeeeeleeeeee snjyndog saewecncrersenvers weoreceaaseeresouelesaser ste phuoddyy : #aIINAVD PrTTT TER (mnpidaug : WdIWULIATVO) ‘aoa = |*wispy| —*suorstargy pv9260]007 FE tO ee OT TT 325 ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. serqoqnd *+|-+*+*-euptaaayq) “TI eee esse resseeseslesssesecs epryea) *suonbaryut *snnordsuoout *snyeusoqye *snyeuuled gfe] eemmagioeg “stursedeyey)|*** uinydn3r94ut “tanyeutoUn “canoTjaurey “tansojnqet)|****++ unysnpe) *WInye][900)|*** TaNyeIOI) “Tisyueg) ¢ "a Peo reeseressesseesieee vulosoTUOd -» = seer" BsOOTIBA oe eeeceesesceseas seeeseces TiitserereeeeseeeelesereegnapUIogEl| ss tttsesseeeeses|esesenssesesesneden *BIIVIDCAT eee eee meee neeeee “cINdIsnw “* vinjeuloun “+ ulnorauey “* unsomoevu want] -POSMLUISND1948 *suadsoqni *sT[eIosey “esojnpou “TIPMON| teers stteeseeeee|eeetereeeeseeeeees “* TausequOTY "8" BSOOTIBA, *** suanboajul ¢ snnoidsuoout ‘ds *enburguoy| TPP e eer e reer eee t eel eases sett ressesseslses : "248090 *SISUO}eULETYe AA *esopouogye “eye]nd *BYBIOBS seeeerees BAB IDES SAO e seme sswaaasssleseneesetgeesssorsiooseus|sneses ‘ds Oo eeceteeonccccesizece *eaqoid SPP eeeeeseeeeeregeleseesseccscsssssslencceslees pjonumpy Pee seereslscereesasceceeeess|sssessleee muna “eqyeord “esoqinq “eraytod BMD TTLS|"s*seeseeeteveseesleeeesleosees mumayT swaVINVAT popu yaa) COCR Coo eee renin errr see eeenee sn OU ds T, Ung eee snyemmes Poem weet eee e en ee el OOO Oars sees er eO ES lence nescsssrencces POOee Fe eneeeee sagan tte enn soteeneee snhnj1a4 *- mnydns194UT “* cIngeuroun “* TANOTTaUIRF "** winhsojnoem ‘ds Z “mnyerOqye -Bosnuisnoi048 und] Porerrerr ry ens} *** BsOUISI} 097) eur81y *** Bu10,soIu03 “2A®] Sececsereeeecerses coowsneeceunQACal *sora4) “DINSsI9AII -BOSNUISNdII4$ FOO eT ee MORO OO Eel oet esas eeeseonseneleceeteretecetstsestsceces “Unty21haD : WaVIBLIaED mona] THYONOS A!" **"| mapa : WaYTIALIaAaY, BY Yee eee ee # ll a REPORT—1856. 326 ae “euose dou *s11y29A0}} *SNVATOX “BuIOysoTsue “snjoalqe *sn[nostp apgfteersstetestensees|ees snqepnusywo *eyvor0d “BSOIqups -sobvdnjvy “punund "RIIBA “erqornd “"eyeVI}e! *suBliage *epnated) é *estadsuoo eradse "ByVIOSey seeneeeeeenpetsaeal essere “puelpalvg|*** “snopuesia “3urding -eyeysootmpeud a | SS —— ——_ “Boptono ssngjepnsuer *snso10qn} “ds seeteeeeeoeerseeerlens STABTHUDPEO eeeeesscesenereseel|errses nuddiyiqg *esiadsuoo)"* + esrodsuoo eeeeenens e1adse eee eeeeee e1lgdse ‘ds “* gnsonsiop)|**"*** Stynostp}): | ; | pemiebemscceroggees|sesesevccsesecsscaicoresessssnloonle PPT TET Ce Prreeee ee [exodse | “B4BU0100' ByBIOSEy pew eweeereesaan[erteeereres® ccncccccscoerecessiccsessccossssoeese “eyva][eul “pawaup *Q |\*Dusofyv) “OD ‘ds PPP seers BABIOSUZE “euatd “stxeuryd “eysopoul PTT TT tt Co eee ee ew eenenee eee eeeeeeee “eoponu + *sTTeUTUIES eer ee ee eeeneesoeeewerttlers —" -mrutofyng 7 | nuofnnor'f Perry eee “ByeT[aqNs "epida| eee eeereseeeresere Perey eee wearer ewneeeeee - uobato : wes eeewerewaretere poa'vini cp abeisinigiais essence repneuea sin |igaer saecie men anerss “yoy see eweeaee Preereeee ee —_——- ere ee ge eese ewes peroneeosrreseneee Prev TT Ch el bid seeeeergrdpsy alesteereeeenereseerleseoeel*** — SNIDSSOT eceescscesceeceec[evcnscenens easeeelensesslseess soni NDOWT weeeee [eaodse | corres BASQPOUL “BURYOHS ep ey| cc punopy7] : WOINTHOLIT “124 | besoa “-sngojohg : WAGINOLSOTIAD “pis | sevens -mynduyy . WavVidvITaAdny sereeelers pounypig * WaINIGONIVG + gnbuhig: (} AVINVISIN) “suomi 109260]007 Disp seeeelpounap 1 AITEEVONOWT, a 327 ON MOLLUSCA OF THE-WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. “Boro “vqe[eos “SoTLysUquyle *sITBAqaroy *Bade[OTA ~eqearerdns| “ds *sugtany PPePIy, “BPRIOSUITC, "2[OOIXES “ejnoaradned “Oy “muny[aqet04 829 enordsuoout “enoidsuoout : i ‘ds “eprainy “esnyyo "2IVAINOXO ‘ds *SIMIIOJLIL[VOS “sytqeyou “snuer “suonbaajur Set ee eee eeeernneee “ere ll] i *SI4.10J "eye ULAY) “BUT}sapureyo} ‘ds “HpABAApPOO AA *BI01I48 ‘ds “eso[noem POOP e ee eesnaesns| StF nsernsenesesaeal Mester ereserganessleeeeetnssseserscrelereces IE 1) 2a : WIXVNVTg ihe) ee eee eT eee eres ee eee ere eee ee ee eed er ree ‘mishai for : WaVISATUAAT “eyerosezian "ByeULI vO "SIpBIORp S| yi wunowT : waINAOWT THN e ewer ere e nasal HHO ee eee em EM HHa eel OTS oes ee emer tsHPeleneeeeuenreeennens ‘Vv wees miqouphey fraarersesvnsonrac|innsearssanensnanulirorsentnserscorsltetunvecesstonscedinnssslbnenesens gluing ; | } ; | preeeeees mumanpré i PPP eee eee ree Td Cerro eT Tee eee ee ees eri ! ! sessooh | | | | | ? Pearce ereevenarsslsseessaeasrseesags|searesresesteseccelasreagtssssesnsens|nanetslaggencnes DOSSIYT é hehe eee) ee Tr Peer eee eee ery | | Peete Oem e teen reslaeertteeene esses i i | POPPE rd errr) er) rd rere) meree ss mUtO8828T : WAIOSSIY | : _ ir ee 2 | ; } | Mido’? REPORT—1856. 328 v's ‘Kasne sgieereeeeetselmosntaqeas| "* ejnosntaiqeos|*** eqmosntiqeos "ROSNY, *suaosaqnd|******staosaqna “esnyns|*teettt "** esnyns “eoyloeg |e “ goytoeg “eyepnysnd| * Bqernjsnd|-**** eyejnqsnd seeeeeeeeouBIped******** SUBIPCL **suerpedl*******sueIped “’puryog tteeeeteendeeeres EpURTOS se eeeer tt eneaecone ***°*-moTTM SUBS seeettenereslane eaumnsues Ot eeeerrees teeseeeesoseprmd “e4e.1}801qns a gltersesee*-Bosng) a a * eqyepnjound) vores BIMOIqRle)****** BMaIqerel"***** BMoiqeae *[eomds ¢] *B4JUTAIAD) *** B4}9UIAII9)|"** vUIayUeXa “esoqqis) ‘ayenbae “* Byeulsieme "RUA POOR eer w eee eetleneeereseeesaneees eeneee BUdAR “eXxopur erseeseesrereeslereees STTQBEIBA “ST[IQUirea *eyeysooluvyd| ***tyeysoorueyd *e][ayIS1u ‘ds Z *emmounse] *suvqnul —_———_ —_—_—_ “DIUbOLYDD "4D ‘sobpdnpy “DUDUDg “DdWMaUp “OD “RITA UINOD]|"**+++++e+e" Peer reeererareree Hee eee eeeeeeene Pen eeereeresestees *** BOLUIO}TeO ) “BUTTOPIA a) 01 80) 1029 | *eaorpeds|: setae eeeeserereeslegesetan Reet eeeseseeeres Feeeeeseesess “mrubofyny "J | ‘viusofiyn °2 B][aquinjoo “exy dooney OOP Pere eerrereneleneeeeesseeressrselsssssslenaritese “sI[va10q|*** ezeT[aouvd) PH me eee eeeeeeeeelsensasteeessenssee eee en eerste wernt lensssenessenesseas #8000 STIIQBLIBA|*#ettr sss teeeeesee ee eee eer eeerenees *uobaiQ *SIUIIOUT *sIU31sUur *(eyeutreorq)|g ? WAVIUVITHONVD Og Peer r er eee eed eee eed DLA T, PROPOR eee eee te el eee eet lene eereee DIA * puodnyT sttecleseeee naudhy ? WAINUdAD seessseeseeesseealsennanlesseensssene monagy seen eter eeeeeeres reer ee Cd cee snipoy :¥aYINAG Seer et eesseeerreesioaneee "* serpun eee Cy weoees (nqny ? WAIXVNVTJ) ‘Disp “IIL “suowseag 1092601007 329 ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. "21831148 *eSOOLTeA|****** BSOOTICA “7 POH OREM O Oe Heel OH HHH FOO H Eee esl seeene esonqony eeeeee esongony SOOO PHO Hee EOH HHH LESOTHO HOH HEEER eae ee eE EF OE EHH HHT EEREI EHF Hee ae eE eet ean eet eeslesease nyngny + WOIwagugy, “VaudIXOy, * snueianiog "eee JOTIOBID|"tteeeeeeresereresleerees JOTTORAB “al'** snzepnuesS|*** snqepnuesd}"** snzepnuess|"** snze~nuesd “snyeaes seeeee snyeoled sueeee snjeoled TORO Hema e eee EOP Ol ee eeeererenseseseH ee SODT EEE HEHEHE FOESl an eessesssesneesesisceses|ss® snquowjs : WaIGNOULS *eU0JSeUIRY . “| euoysosditpog|**emoysoshryo teseeteneceenesleneees BTMABABIO **** Bqessnoep ** eaqornd ** ByeTTOSSO9 *exuddd *(sterzostaqter-+ )eyeordran “eB {Opul “CPETOSEIIQ “stuage *eyeualo *e4RI9 sere eprgqel se eprqre “snqnqing “a seer e ese seseeeeree *eyeynuMes * saltrttteesesseneses]sseeeseseeneeeeeelees ggpromtoong *eyeurmnoe i eR fl “STAI ic * BUOJSOIUOS|*** eULOYSOIUOS|"** eMOysotuOs “ql “5+ epros|ssss*** eprfos|'**"** eprfos “S[ULTOJTpIsswo|***¢++++++++++++]>> gromosTpIsseo *BSOOII}UGA|"** SODTITUIA *Byepooorn|****** eyepoaoIn rersseesereseesdleeseseens gggggltteesss Bgaqo “epipueo Fs *BSOOLIQUOA “eyeTnormny, PAPEETE Ce ee ed DLDIIUDD ' os boToIe!"g fo ’ i “7 Sige f t *I][NU-opao | *BuLTTIOer3 see tere ee ee eeseee "BQ01 Renee enter eeeeene “eqe BLY ‘ds ¢ | *eradse *** STULIOJBAIVT REPORT—1856. Pel eceerereereserveneleeteeevenseeeseses reree* stdom Axo}, ttt" BaaRAITO peeres lien “eaproyyttad see BsOnqony it a BadRATTO ' “snynarya: >*-eyepnoRmUn preveeeseeeepagrd preeeeeeseoemnord { poten wewenensseees pees eso[noeU)| ByeNouNy ) “stTIqou BAgzIfNo1aqnytq | “BaagztTNo19qny}]) mh ee) prorecooever pang : “BaIOUTOOJNA “Bsopouqns)|’ “TSpuryy “Bq UTOOG|e *RjUDolIvA Bysnqoa * eyeypioads ° +89 egonqony *vaquinyd| sBTULIOUT|** "tse teeeeseeee | | : Pees paprprUrel ts ettesssses ees : { ; ; ] ‘puso fyng "7 | mrusofyna “A "BYBUTTAT|} sss ttt seeenee i Creer re rr Ty i i i | uobatQ ———_- U i 4 see eeseerewneenees ‘ououp Gaal | Laan seeeee li + F peeseeseeeeeeseeesleeeeeslers mone “put | -OJ0unag :¥AINOLOMAAT ‘|"(wyaunhy) DAQA4AT, ‘+ (pphang) : (araradoaay) ‘Isp, “suoeszarqr pooeboqoog ve ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 331 Se "BABII """ / *BY[DO *[eysopom=] eyout0 “euosexay “ayenore, “eprpusyds “Bye4SOoTq|e “elopIant *10[001q|"* * 1OTOOIq) *BOLIUDXA|"** BOLIyUeOK * Barysnd epyed seeeeeereeeeel sees cope STU “ds 3): *10TOOTUN| “BSOLIYS *snosijaqo “Bye[noewIpuL: *eqeLysoyejound *(qomye) eg tectttreessseeeeeleeseseanegnit09 “eso[nue.ia|* ee ggernuoz|* *stoostp-+ ¢*4098]" testes gtpnul* ‘eyez * eUILLIa4e) ve ‘grpna “tha i “esopouogye||. “esOTTBAOgTal). [moumufoq] “BOING |*** tere crreverrewe| coevenserenve scree! ee es DYaAnyqory “eqnorpy|"***"" “eee mag : ) *sugoseandind ** suaoseandind ‘+ gtrgospandand||=+sssessseseeeeess [ees [snydm0o)] “x0qe1pr1s peerre oyurpes)"***** royerpeys "x10 tet eeeseeeee xnu lai ea | oeeveeeesvers WNIT *sIteeos|***- ‘ds % “esoo[ns *ey09[30U “eum1ou0d *saploquos4s “ByUnUIS ‘esopnmures “en3Ixa "episil *eqdqnos *B4RII98 “Sle [20.1031 *BIOJITEUBIIQ|*** vAaTITeMLOIG “" POOP Pewee PEO OEHlenneweseseeeeseaee sees pap SnI10d *sueoTU *eYLIOUl “epipuvo *ey00[S0u *e9090 *syyenbsmb “290119 *esoTNOLIeA “eqnU109 REPORT—1856., "VY 'g| ‘sobvdnjny ‘nupung | *pawaupy “9 332 “BYRISOOTINOL|"1reeeseeeeeeee*|* BIVISODTINIB *snqejnoround “snqpisnd *snumulou0o *sngesni1oy *SNOTUIOJT[eD Preeeeer ree ee PBISBD|" hers ercscereeree|leoceeecevecscecees seeder eeeeseserees “pyutofiyng “9 || ‘mruofinng "7 | orusofiind “0 *eaqainyd Pre eer rere) seeeseceteeestrone uobatQ RMABA TT eeesseesseseeeslseeseseeewenee sens eee eeereresenesees seerereceoensesess Peeeeeteseeeerseee *eTTaq eeeeereeetereseees|icorenseeeersesssasicasseseee [ereq] OOO eer eeserronsceslvoeretenerereaeeaslsseess ‘you eooees U1) 4 seeeeveeeees SNUOD 3 WAINOD) " pyabunyy sees papygyy “+ pyauydog (‘oyjae} -nYjnQ :KAINOLOMNATY) “suorseangy 7001601007 *eqeo[nsqns *@}e[[OUIe] *e7e[N.IT[qns 333 *eprlAvls Cees eerenooresseeteseseeresteeecersslessoes 20u0280pQ “ds “snoruo0d SCO eaetesaeesseees|etteses §nolm0d; *SM[MARIO|"***** SOLIDE) ||eeeereesseeerseeeelenssereeccsceeveselesssscsecserscerseleseseteaarereeeses|eeeees snosyaqQ i WarTIAGINVAXY «ds “eye [NoTeueorq “esouRigy***** esouvis, *"eyesaliea; Toor eceseecssecelseseee eyesoliea SO eee eaaaeeceeracaleeseereacseeeeseaslacceseresaacsseeeslooesseeessensressslesceuclscesce DULLOT, ‘ds *sdoormpenb “UuNyepnUeLs{|°"* TangeNuess|"*(UM4e[NUEIS) “QTIUDOU|A| seeeeeeeeeeeees rereaseersescresdecesescancsaseteselecsserleesessqumesDIOG : WAVIXVIOS ce a ae a ne y “VaddIGIOsoqoug *‘eUlOpeIp “IBA ‘SnotuoZzNT “IBA ‘SNLICA “IBA ‘SNUITULUL ***** snauunig|’***** snag’ * snqeu103 *(souaury) uedoyeul|******1aesoyeur sreseveerelooee stomtogtIcd “snyeqqtalsss** *snuvizuelo'y Se CEE EE Joeeess sdaoutd) aeeeee sdaoutd seeeee sdaourid ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. a * cat rn an = atare me REPORT—1856. *sohndnjny “pUnUn rer rr! “DIUMIULPT “2 *eVITTINUI} *St[eIqarI} “SuadSaAup “eyepun “BUNT IOvIS *esoqqis 2] RvOLINUL *eyeSuojoid { ‘+ sTuntuM0d | *SIUUTOFITIsNeTD “eyequaput *stoud "@XOA09 *can[nad *eYRIOSy sesnyja “uastayy *umnidoosayoz “eSu0[qo *eyepungor “esopou *BYBAO *eurydiziz *e4eIeXa “By RULLe “eyeUNdv] “eyoutoanbumb *SIULIOJLIV[VOS ‘ds.¢ ds *smntay “Rye [IME “RyeyeA “nuusofnng “9 *eyenbi0: “BHOINU4 weet eteereccccee | | | POPE EO ee rena ee naal sees TOOOEeEseeTeesleeeeeeeHeEEeeansealeeerHeeEsEstaseee® | j L AOR Peer eaeesroasleee ets eeeoaeessOeleessessanessest assess sess esessnaseee POOH Hee et teen u esl POs erst THEO HEetlggeesesstessts tage sees tense esensees POC e ee O Hoare EOF TLOOeH FF OOOHHE EE GE sles seers tase esssH Hi S eases Est eeseses “myubo fing "T \*viiofyng |} *uobasg sseeleee onmpshaya mwUay pln eeeeseles (nuynar.np) (miu ‘9+++lo9809Q :WAITIXGINVUX,) *suowsiarg 700160,007 ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA, 335 ‘ “Byessndap *@X9A09 *xo10g | *stoxzoj1dnd "29.199 Co oawenesennennas sstseeepaoTg BADAT| teeeteeeseetaee|eerentens pagars ‘ds Zz “BU1OISIPE _ ‘SETBOUT] veqdni19}U1 PPP Co ee errr re seeeeeees@apasey, *suduIny *SLULIOJISHY ‘dsi ‘ds ¢ *2}0]0SqO *eIpauuiazUl *eye]TQ0UvO “eqyelnsuequs *eqemponed “giro * sisuomeutg ‘suepy-d-9 ‘ds 7) . oocueCtULOSUFIOGY *soproyno.reqny| “BIIV4ITOS eoertenterdrceened seeres BLIB{TOS¢| Bynoe | | i ‘ds zl POOP e Oe eter ener elensengeseessnesees i i Pe eerceesereeeeeslesessasssegeeseses see eeeaneresees Pew ersseereneree Pee ee re rome teteeeletsseesentetoneese | @eeeesesecases Paeeeeeeeeesreriesiene eee eeeeees POMOC ere rere aae ees caassssngtaesasees OOO e were eeeereeeeslonaeessenceetesees POO mee teroeereseeelantseeesssnesoeee® OOOO eter renee eee en neesaaeeennsrons SOR eee ee eeeessseasinnssesenserseesses weeeee “928 | -d01y7way : WAISAOWLIUAD | seeens safyhag "** yoD44s8oIa'T se nm + AINIIAT eeeeaeees syor ses mau, “* (pisayunq) * a " ae . cl nh a are % episte PRPS et NSIS. 4 alll “BaxNoToy|****** T1soAsa'T) “a PrUvUTERUT TTT yi Ce ee er Pee Ce Perry eriAlodult *euLANeo "BARB) "its veqvuNnT egal tteeeeereeeeeeee*]* epuerjakatnog ‘ds z “e1IeUOZ “1]9Ue EY *BYBABOXO|"***** VIVAVOXD ‘ds “BYBTOSEFIG { BOTUIOJT[ED IA *Mltt* BUBODOIeUA|*** TIzqATIIUTAYD)|*** TPAVY}IIg)|*** CUIOOIBUT||***+ess+rree eee ormzop TBO eueoooieM e c “esnepo] “Wit vauM\T : WAIOILYN, “eulopel P rP *eyeTNOUNy as eeervoneeeeteges wee Byepnormny SOO oy Ce) Ce Cee “DulatjosAry ag trretertereseeeeeleeeseeee> asngqo “TISpUlHy “usurung “esopouqns “rely *slie[ndo1 *eyCULUIN}eyS *eutd[nAa *eulTNoI0R -wuriq “SIU OJRIALOL *euoSexoy|'**'"** Buosexat****** eUOsexXoy (‘ds ¢) sev eeeeeseeeee COE SIs (317-3 *BJVISODLICI “eqelayseidns *exopar “BpOUTYSIPUL REPORT—1856. ‘ds sJeeteeeeeeeeeeelenes sirpzisne ‘BOIpURTUMID| “Wi BwMvag : waVINVIVOS *ejnoradned (‘stsdo]} co “eq09|30U cont cccescccccccccieccccccecccacennes|lcoenacsevcecess Preeeee Te ee eed eee eee eee Pee eee er 24299 : W AISdOlHLIUay) oD a oe ae | "y 's| *sobodyny “DUDUDng “‘nawaup *Q |"Dulofyng “4p || ‘nusofyny *T | “wrusofin) “7 “uobaiQ ‘auja4p = misyy| — *suorszarg 2p0160j007 Comes seareserserlicergsenereee eee “7 Feet een erate seeelsen sere teoeesetesslesstesonneue sees —— —— *sngord *1kqramog *snge[norjor ai" “* snus] “q Pt eaeceres eee snsoqqis ory|ttetteeeeeee ** sngo1ysu0o *SNIUITXa *SN4VI9SI1qQo10 337 *SN}T4S0A|"**""*' snqtsad “sn[emoue *SIUIIOFLIE[VOS “SUIS ty errr rit) TCO Peer ee eeeeeealeceteeeesouseeeany *e [SMUraBiq] | testeeees * UOjit], : WAIINOLIYY, “BIVIAGIQGR|"** ByeIAaIqqe “8}E40.1BOD/"***** ByBJOIBOO|"**"** BIBIOTBOO|"***** ByLIOTBOD ehhh LE LE Pee Peery SO eeeeeeeenserns see eseneeees 818809 oo) Corer rr Prey "8" MOsQ WAISSVA | “navy, : WavVIIOG vNIWT * WALTINOIT 7 ? ¥aViaVITINV'T “** BsoTNOTaqny/"** Bso[no1aqny|*** esomoraqny Se eeteserseeslecesee suaSuLt “*e*sTIqe[ yey SOP eee ceererertnee “BSOOII}UBA)"** Byessndap)|*** esoorTUOA ‘ds z Hee ewes erneseeterlssessveag Pee eeeleeeeseseresses SOP eseeeseelsesenesssens te] tteeeeeseeeeseeeeleee geuynarup “sISuUdYoqIS . “Bsorsuods “Ba0RT100 Duna, ? WAINILATIA Peewee er eesaseteesione Ceeccclesecce snjaupbry HNO Pere econ eeeebeeleeeesseeecosseeees “sIqep ‘ds “sisuavmeneg oi | Peo sisuauoSuryeg *BOUISIIA “Bye@[novuNION seeeeseee qoqn: *enoidsiad See Pee aeessseeseesloneees| sesees sa00uyog *BuvIZNOaY HOOT Cee ea eaes el seeeeesdsdenedsedslecctss| esses Dydanany ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. “Ipurjduog “esodedeyey) reeastesees grag REPORT—1856. 338 7 PrePTTRi i ODP aes ceeanzer snes seeetteeeeee sud] ‘emeur eearereeerer * eoccceccccsontcaca set ewelewetereeeeee XT (a : WNIMLTYA *oures Aeah ve nxa his Con h oag sv Sak Gi doesn pansy secseeeeeeeeeeseneleseees gdggutadl|® ciseeslesceweeeceaeeeceee|eeenebnaereterenslensenavererseus best see 88" DILDIOIISD YT eeqepnSuro|""*** yen durol"** ByamButo||ersssreseseesessrelerseeeceesecvenens revscoccseccvecsce|vecvcccecevscs s++ees|meuozoana'yT “SNSOOLIBA *SNOLULOJI[eD Pry CO) Ce ll seeeue SNMy JOT : WAVIUNVIOIOSV ngnquuntyl|sseeeeeeseseeseeepeeseseseees aglecsessesesseeeseeeleeseesee® gugsaza|'s*** eyoapam)|****7*"* stagsazolfesss** sees 1QUny, > WAVTTAMIAAD J, “pUpultrtteetteeeseeeete|seeeeeee see pa “ayulnotaqny ¢ ‘ds “ayeuryood sgrungogrotamu|******s*¢*e*e***| lees TeTOFTOLMT “BOTUAOJT]VD, é' *eajonbiy beer eeeeeeeteweeetion “TaymMUIY) teeweees eee ** ummsopou “7 ee sete eeeeeeeelereenerereeseeeenel ieee (mnaqeos 2) taneee wmnaqeos Perret ee *9guauos01Q) _ *y\(mnmoongobay ) AisscFonesavestems qtteeelenneee (uopee, J, : WAINOLIN,) aeecslpoecereeeresesrennleseeeel seeeee nyauny eerecvccces|pevecengcccosovcnsieesonsiqeesee DUOR MAT “‘SnhuUlysapurlo Pre ePOe eee eee es ae ———+| |. ‘powaup 9 \*nrusofynp |__| 'y's| ‘s0bndymy | ‘nunung “sqeuoz|"""""""* sieu0Z wee "eee" BrIOZeUe! “eyoutooaine “d] *B).103UT “‘euep 339 “Bjorn “1oqysedjod)<|*** 1aysedjod),]-**++- n8urmng “eqepumaa|** meget * eyemnuaa ‘e[Npipueyds R[Nprpueyds “ISIOYOTOA|"* “ISIOYTOW “eyenguel""*** eyeynSuel's'--- eyensue *erAqdaod)****eradydsod|-++*--ersAydsod H *eouIngag *[IsoUA[Og]|*errtsttteececseea|eesseereeeeeseereelsenene 1sopong “RJ OUT IOJUL *cununad)|*** susosopn.tao *ey[odes|****** erodes “ejowad Ao “eyRoTIq ual srourru| ste ttt ee sete “BIN IIes.1eU “eqjod “24.109 ** mutiny senerre|soceevens ediey . * esnya F *esnya|* sere grqstaql: ‘jog Jeyeormu *esorye13 “eqedeseng, { streseeeeveveneleoeeeopapnorUmy *eLIe{I[OS “e[oo [anu “ systay _ "eaqea| “eyeoyn “TISpUutyy ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. “Loyoye "elIVUIpUR]s)|"**"** eyevortdiq ee eel Le Pe Pe) eer eee Peery ere rreeereesenslens Toaponrqun] Atanevoceceeclesscnsccccesengecslescccucccccreetass|eeeecsssseeeesseee sereerleeseesses DIN04 ? KAILNTOA : | sreeseesececealecceeeees gragtaallseserseossenssesseleseonenstessscseralaceresaseasssseedlosasaceeaseaneess reeedleseees gagobeags | “eyeLOSejoyns i | “ds seerescccaceccvces! sans “9 pyaauo —- — | | seeeereses DANO ? WAIAITO | i | i | ee + pyaubunyy “IIJOMOr eer eesereseresens| . i i | | { Frog i vy *esolqaes|***"*' wsorqayes|****** BSOIqaTes|****** BsoIqoTeS exp |teteeeeeeeeeneeeesleeeoeeeeeere TT i radse : *84003)" “7 eeeeoeeeeesereees “*stuIoginbsory . *84904 ++++e6s]esTTTOFINDSOTy| “2424800 *eridsoueyd _ *Byepooare “+ orami****** SMAI) zyepun)|*** sipezsoorq)|****** stpettasiq * eyeormull’ eyeoLMed}’***** vyCoLINU *** SLIB][aUIN [OO] ** *SLIVTTauUNTOo sesseeeeeeesleeeoreres poupd)|tereres* emged “esotoads)|****** sIperqasta3 ** Stren sueny "eyeUIseua “slre][auN[oo ‘epnyed| REPORT—1856, *sISUa[OIED)|*** StIepNSuerAy|* “eyeuelo “equias|*** 200}80)|""**** Creeeerrrrrrsy 2900489} 9084899/"""'** eq|** vurjyuoaley “a - oy aee BICLIYSIOIs *eprontjed *eT[aqNOA]* eTjaINTOA *enordsuooul|* ep *** gnordsuoour “eljayepun eyjayepun)****** eypayepun *VUIS10} seeteeees BuIsi9} ‘piudofyng “D "‘DIIaUp *)- ‘puDUung “"y *s| *sobodojny 340 “suapraal C *unjeuosua TOTO |" AGG) Clef FOOD eee ee enseees| Coats tonstereeeeas **“payopnasg Peoeereeseeseneees seeeeelees maummngeg *e]B[OIAOJ Pee Pet onececeeeees|seeeesteses Seco reer sneteeson|tetene “snpayoozyay PPPURETEETTT TTT errr eerreerere ied ery ste8ereee nN * @yeUlsieule|"** eyeULs1eua “edaey *BUI0}SO10UL “VUdSe] *BULIYSO STTeUOLIZUI}das|St[euoryueydas ‘snqtdey seeeeeseeontptdey (exeys0outs0ap)|" “Tourosorg |" 'V “yi. punding ? ©avanaang seeees *‘DaLvyy * nuoboup Oem renee eer ee saelees ens eeseees stone eer eesseenere Pee ee ee 2 TIPPETT Er PRP Ce a) sreeeeees(naQuO : WAIAIIO) musofyny “T| “musofyv) "A uobatQ ‘auoup = Ds *suorsrarg yv01boj007 a 341 ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. oe RENNIN" ==> SEE PE CTS KGa’ SECT | Laman ann | mamma 7 ane Tmmmmonsserr sa -—aat y *SURIIBA “eUlOISVUMazy|*** VUMOyseTUeY ; “BprAly *v19001d *stu1ojid.ey *TautAlog|****"* ToutATog appl eteeeeeeeseeeeesdeeeseeees gsorquy] tress" wsorqey *BATISO} ‘sttepaed *eaueyseod | “eye 8 | *elnLLoyornd * pyvosng|********* egeosny og| cer etteeeee| StURIOFTGUIOIys} STOLTOFIGUIOTys) STUTTOFTGUIOTS . zofeur pS zofem *eynseu 8}, 9UTAIOO 7 ed “eUeTUIO;ICO seyeurieo|""**** Byeure. | “sIsuareqieg Bug RICALSNET| serserrsseeseersseleseesslses HanUINIOD : FAINIOONG etereeereeseelereere BIIVIQLIO ‘ds *BOIUIOFTTCD *IIpmoy TTT eee erry Oo DapUyINe : *ByeUlOZ *8010}800010]"** BUI0}S00010 emneu|"****"*** BIMeUr *euloysorAd|*** eutoysordd “eryoynd)|***'** euelAeoy “elreuoqieo|"** eLremoqg.eo ** 24081]U00 “stjeuoseydoy *B}B[O9ATB *esoSnt|" SOP n ates eeeleeeSeOeeehOFOSSessiisaererenererearene COO O Pere mee E Eee EEE HHHH ETHER TOEH cee POEOOH EHS EOEEES| Seseeeleeeeerene oubug ‘spueis ied a umgejuapraoxq|[unafirus09)]|)""***rereese+* Cumnguguepraaxd] : | _——— \ aos eangurnozaqna| é — an Pere.’ _REPORT—1856. 342 “ego UL0pou “BLazINsue) “exopipouy'***** erajrpou tgltcrcctreetteteeebeeereeees Banasay “THOSTE AA “BYLIT}S *SISMOTIeUe ‘gone[s “eytatnd.109 “Bite[[09 *suadsouZo ‘epyred ‘suopned *sIsuondedd A, OU *e[NOSNLaqevos|***B[NOSNAGvos *esopnurwas seeeeenee *"R4Saul see eetooelere esojnummied *snpoSul}***'* snpoded|**+****+*eynoe) ¢ "BUIOJSO94N]|"*" BUIOJSOIyNT|*** UIOJSOIINY] *IO[OIISADA}"*****LO[OOISAVA|****** LOTOOISAIA ‘tanayoynd ‘ “TANGeALIG “7 ee eeeereessres “7° gsuomvued “tgsepoul pomast MECORGERy "Pee tes ess scere *IO[OOTUN]? retest terete tees Serer errr memereseelaeneseeeetsreeeues LAN -sohvdyjny “pUDUuDg “Sn[laqoord] Behe rare “TSpuly | wawwaupy “2 ‘ds 6 *e4V1I4S11qo10 *v[ndo4 ‘ds f “musofyny “9 [reese reereeeerenelesnewareesseseress|eseeeesssssesansanlesessssssensseusrslettnenleaesenees 80Ud sen teeeee enda3 ‘smSutdazad|*** sm3utdsod "Byessos|s*'****** ByESSOJ|********* IESSOT “eoIpuoll Peewee aware eee eeel ere eeeeee DSSONT “eaoernduie) wits wayng [unma onnenee|@unees -ong-opnasg | *1U0s[Nog *uingesnIIOD *(unA0) |" ‘unsorqauay] "yi" wnuoong Cees Cor [eysopour] Meee teen eee eeeeeelsmeseeeereneeerens| wereesl ane DIADIUNA TF, OP ee ee err ere eee ry ninjayy eee meee te eeweeeeslaaeene “*(myjaqungog : WaINIONNG) Coe eeU eee Tee CTT eee eee eran Peers rere errr r ry SS _— — | ——_— |__| | —— | mudofyny "7 \niusofyn ‘2 ‘uobaiQ ‘aujoup =" pisy7) = “suoussangy yvorboj007 a So 343 < 3) L a4 = < <>) e & [o) vA 12] ° & a < (=) o & a E io rs] B =] ° < (2) m =) | | ° a 4 ° “a Peete eeereeeretocelesseee eemsid seeeeraes exmsiéd “eaqng|"*** "eaTny “PATNI *ey@uOr0d|""**** eyemor0d|"'**"* vyeUOIOD “BULIepeos|****** BULIe[eOs|****** eULIeTeos *24R]]29800|""** seeders" B92T19]S00 7 | Cees Pee ““TaUIOySEDH ‘ds z “esopouogqye “eqouTyOINI “e{IIOS “Bosnyzoisiu “eprrred *snpoaponu -eqeriaeg||"* Piaessesnssoss000|Sseesrnssacesaseus(Boucaccasraweessattovwnsltexsee Corners eeceseees sryoDuy resesesenereenseeslenesteeaeseseseaealnseeelteeees mauautog “mINUT]Ja0uvO "wInjesnL100 ‘snoqdig -snqjaq| TnyeIyyepO| “VW uoydouy, ‘Tisrenoyytyedng)}rssstseeeee lsrenoyyjednq “a SOOT ORT ET PERO eH weelena eee ETO OORTON lessees eeaseaceees|seeees snpyyed ‘ds z *snjiode “suaTany “sngsnqure||: *sueUSiy Sette eeesenereseeelseneeneeeseoeeesselessensveatesreeees gosessk rex eies msc tborrae seers gn gmat “SHpHn] *SISUaTOHS *(aeg)|"q *(qautmqeg)|"q -(snompurysy)|-q *(srom10jop)|"q *(snnbyue))-q-y ‘TUIQeS| “Wi snmoposhuyg : #aIOIAOW sae ‘ ondhg > WaIINAxg 2 Ste I EE EEN SE SST ET SET Ca dl AOD UO Ory seceveres eyed “snqeordiq i “sng1any S be | “sngenonae seb eesees ernyed Eucsievia enged Peon emer eeeren serosa rerereseeseelestunetetene wh teen athe +1 ee ts De . ey seeeee BATOISTP| ttrreereeeeceeanelosceeees yyy | Cee naan) B4e1198) Se reeroeavereevogalseroosees sysud OOPere Teer eee a a) DIY ZAONT ay rstntrensegaseess coeeee “stato *euermosduing “sisuateueg|: "240480001510 *slaqnany *suasuti|" . i=! . eeceeenre . suposed I E "7 PTT RT STUSISUT . eeeneseres trees STUSISUT *eqyuajounsues|* *equa[ounsues on eeeees Byeuues see BAB[OD0UR] PrYTITULE Tee ee Ce seeeeeeeontunsgy *eIasTeUBoIg)*** BLayIeUeoT oes *|-++*** gmraqqis seeeseseeseeseeneelseseveeespaygIOp “sLiepnsue tesreesaerrseeeseleceervens BaTTngleesseers® Bag *SIULIOFISNy “suedo]o *esOTNOVU|****** BsoTNIeM sdg||streeerenceceveenelosssansesceesensvelanessssssaneenece|sarneecessanenessslevecesl#e"*1201U0LI0 : a a “a g a “esopnsni “BLIL]UIMIVIYL |" * VIE UETILIyL *suvolISiu|****** sWBOTISIU “7 Pee w eer ereseereeeelseereseee eAred ‘ds "LIRA “P4R][A88o} *24Sc0UL *eqeIAT # *sI[LOeIs, “equip *enoidsuo0o "1 see eeeeeetesoneeeelsageneres esoSni se teoeeee esoSna "eyenjong|****** eyenjony “BSOUISIGUOT|"**eeeseesonsereeelseseeserseanescenalersnaceaceseacsenslertenccerestannuceterserecreceseesste|ecsons ‘sees (Seyomup : WaIOTAOW) REPORT—1856, "y °s| ‘sobndvjoy “DUDUDgT *vawaup 9 \niusofyng *y || nrutofyng "7 | vusofyng “A uobaiQ, ‘uM =| DS *suorsiarg 700260,007 WW et tN Ne ee 344 seygnazoya | ‘gq |-fup +: WaIHLATLOHOANG @ jt? sndoja9 : walaqoad0L09 345 *VGOdO1IVHdAD S819 “1 ACRE P ere reets tees ogesereeeeesseeres seeesesngvrpend *srpuelZ “GUILEIQUIY||sreesseeeeeesesee]seceerecvaerenaeeleoarcavecenseses|eesscsesssseccesleneeclesesneeee saudi 7 appltereseseereseesees|eneereees XOQTA appltetereereneserees|onreseres gauagta *eSIOUl TC Ly ee CO) *RYBIATL|**soplOdOBUTII)|B}LIUpUT *19)é tep|trrrsrscererereovelecssesccesceceseeslescscvversvereressleeserrres “Bddey ‘ds *snpixned *eyeLIquiy, "eyeoIpel cored seongory|******|*** (naproninyy) ippleseteeseneeeeeeess|enereere xtppafeeeteres erper *snyjueoeAxo *smigaa|srsserss snigag}"**tte** snr *10[OoIq|**"****** LOTOOIq “SHprpm)******es* spy ‘sdoourad “BOISSBI *snglisiu *stpetadunr PPTITTT TTL) Pee ey COOc og te *(sngouoyhyd) “THTP}HON “AN yeTTOF|"***** WOpOUOTA]"*****)***(wuoZsD.La9 ) “eSnjzI1jUI0 “snoyonu *SNATISOJ ORME T ed ***(sngououazd ) “snytund “7 COR e sete t ees eeseesieaeee® snpii10y, *sns0o10 a SERCH e ee Peer eeeeleee 811980119091 ¢ ‘ “S{1}SOITAINOA|“SLI4SOTATNOI SMPTAT] “ANDO canoaanibns » “enyeord tag am snyeordit + <6 yippee aS us _— — a >) Lendl 4 (2 a < im >) ro] ° a ie ° i n a ° rs) 5 w B 2] is} x fey ° a cS) 2 D +c) | ° P= vA ° 346. REPORT—1856. 70. Now let the student of geographical distribution of Mollusca begin by observing the fauna of our own seas, and learn, from the invaluable work of _ Forbes and Hanley, to discriminate species and eliminate those that are spurious. Let him then, taking Philippi and M‘Andrew as his guides, compare them with the shells of the Atlantic and Mediterranean shores. Let him, with Gould and DeKay, note both the similar and dissimilar forms on the shores of the United States. Let him, after studying the very characteristic fauna of the _ Caribbean Sea, again cross the Atlantic, and observe the reappearance of well- known forms, in spite of the vast extent of ocean. Let him trace the fauna of Senegal with Adanson, of the Guinea coast with Dunker, and of the Cape and Port Natal with Krauss. Here let him enter on the vast Indo-Pacific province; and, having taken-in the general conception of the fauna from any _ collection of East Indian shells, let him examine its special districts, from Akaba, to Easter Island in the latitude of the Gulf of California. Let him learn from Cuming the vast variety of generic and specific forms which cul- — minate in the Philippines. Let him trace some of these westward even to the northern extremity of the Red Sea, where they associate with types from the Mediterranean and even the West Indies ; and eastward from group to group of the coral or volcanic islands in the vast expanse of the Pacific. Let him note the reappearance of forms at the Cape and Australia, in spite of the broad waters of the Indian Ocean. Let him learn from Nuttall the species which are common to the Red Sea and the Sandwich Islands; and from Stutchbury those which abound both in New Holland and Tahiti. And, having at every step in his inquiry found somewhat in common with the last ; having, when examining the shells of the Marquesas in the center of the Pacific, found several conspicuous and well-known forms of the Asiatic Seas, in spite of (in parts) the profound depth of ocean that lies between; he will naturally expect, as he reaches the American shores, to find also not a little ~ i in common with the opposite shores. He crosses the vast unbroken expanse of the West Pacific; one flank of the hemisphere of waters, which of itself almost rivals the Atlantic in extent. He pauses at the solitary Archipelago of the Galapagos, in the very longitude of the Gulf of Mexico, guarding (as it were) the great bay of Central America, and within 600 miles of its shores. Even here his eye rests with pleasure on a few well-known Cones and other forms, which have crossed the fathomless depths and come to claim kindred with their molluscan brotherhood of the New World. But here they stop. They could traverse half a world of waters. The human spirit that gives them understanding and a voice, beholds them on the very threshold of the . promised continent, in whose bays and harbours, protected by the chain of everlasting mountains, they shall find the goal of their long pilgrimage. But the Word of the unknown Power has gone forth; and the last narrow channel they attempt to cross in vain. We speak now of the first general impression, without regard to excep- tional cases: and the ascertained facts fully bear us out in saying that there does not exist on the surface of the earth a more separate, independent - assemblage of mollusks than is to be found, under three great typical divi- sions, from Oregon to Chili. Mr. Nuttall, in passing from California to the . Sandwich Islands, found only a Hipponyx in common. Messrs. Cuming and Hinds, both of whom had well explored the seas of the E. and W. Pacific, and of whom the former made his great collections in the two equatorial . boundaries, with no inconsiderable research among the intermediate groups, _ having compared about 2000 species from the two districts, came to the MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 347 conclusion that only one shell is common to east and west, and not even that to the intermediate islands *. 71. And if we are thus struck with the isolation of the W. American fauna in general, so are we with the separation of its component parts. Let us compare (as being the most unmixed sources of information) the central collection of Prof. Adams at Panama, on the one side with the equatorial collections of Messrs. Cuming and Fontaine, and with the Chilian researches of the former and D’Orbigny ; and on the other with the Gulf collection of M. Reigen, and those in California by Mr. Nuttall and the U.S. Exploring Expedition. We find that, while so large a number of species are common to Mazatlan, Panama, Guayaquil and the Galapagos, that they may fairly be reckoned as one great province, scarcely any are common to the equatorial districts and Chili, and still fewer to the Guif and San Francisco; insomuch that on a comparison of known forms between Mr. Nuttall’s collection, M. Reigen’s, and the W. Indian fauna, it may be safely asserted that there is more in common between the two latter than the two former. We proceed now to the details and the exceptions ; merely premising that the student must bear in mind the very unsatisfactory nature of most of our materials, and must therefore receive what follows simply as the approxi- -Mation partially attainable in the present state of the science, and not as absolute truth. 72. In the Boreal Fauna, we naturally look for different conditions from those which prevail in the continent generally, The near connexion of Asia and America at Behring’s Straits and the Aleutian Islands leads us to ex- pect similar forms on the two continents ; and as the boreal species are known to be both widely distributed and extremely variable, we shall not be sur- prised to meet again with a few familiar European types. The following Poxar species are quoted from the extreme north at Iey Cape :— Corbula gibbosa. Natica pallida. Tellina alternidentata, Buccinum angulosum. —— inconspicua. ; polare. —— nasuta. tenue. Astarte a) { =corrugata. Chrysodomus fornicatus. - lactea =semisuleata. Trophon lamellosus. Trichotropis borealis. :. of these none as yet appear in the Sitcha lists but Tellina nasuta, and the European Trich. borealis. The latter probably reaches Oregon, while the = travels as far south as San Diego. _ 73. From the Strcwa district are quoted 102 species (25 bivalves, and 7 univaives); of which 16 are northern forms, not known south of Behrin 3 18 biv.+26 un.=44 are found in Asia, principally in the Ochotsk Sea ; biv. + 12un.=19are common to Oregon; about the same number, but not the ame shells, are found in Upper California, and a few have a wide range. Triton r is the only Sitcha Proboscidean which reaches California. The Kamts- atkian Cryptochiton Stelleri and Placunanomia macroschisma reappear in Jpper California, but have not yet been found in intermediate stations. Mytilus ulis reaches from Kamtschatka to Upper, and Tellina nasuta with Cardia ; i and Californiense to Lower California; while Acmea patina travels _ * Vide Woodward’s “ Manual of Mollusca,” pp. 373 et seq., London, Weale, 1851-56: a work which combines in a small compass, and at a price within the reach of all, a larger Amount both of accurate detail and philosophical research than is anywhere else accessible, The chapters on geographical and geological distribution are invaluable, 348 REPORT—1856. under a host of names to the peninsula, and even straggles into the Gulf. Scurria mitra, Osilinus ater and Omphalius mestus reach from Sitcha to Lower California, and Acmea persona sparingly enters the Gulf; while the ubiquitous Saxicava, one species probably under a variety of names and forms, appears, like man and dog, to adapt itself to every variety of climate, and to reappear in every well-searched fauna, boasting also of being one of the most ancient types now living on the surface of our globe. The Litorina aspera and Callopoma fluctuatum, quoted on the authority of Barclay, are so essentially tropical, that we may be allowed to suspend our judgment before we receive them into the fauna. 74. The Orecon shells belong, in the main, to the Californian type, but present, thus far, peculiarities which demand a separate study. ‘The total Bivalyes. .OTdinary poxiferg, Probosci- Univalves. difera. number known are ........0.... L44= 49 72 1 "4 Of these have, in addition, ee iG 6 9 0 1 found only in Upper California os » also in Lower California 12= 5 6 0 1 The following—Crenella discrepans, Trichotropis borealis and Bela ?tur- ricula, are European forms. The following are the principal sea shells as yet peculiar :— Terebratula pulvinata and canrena. Katherina Douglasiz. Panopza generosa. Puncturella cucullata and galeata. Solen sicarius. Litorina lepida and scutellata. Venus calcarea and ampliata. Lacuna carinata. Cardium blandum. Cerithiopsis filosa. Pecten caurinus, hericeus and Town- Lunatia caurina, herculza, algida. sendi. Purpura ostrina and lagena. Placunanomia alope and cepio. Columbella gausapata (the mostnorth- Chitonidz dentiens and lignosus. erly species of the genus.) Callochiton interstinctus. Nassa mendica. Mopalia vespertina. Trophon Orpheus and corrugatus, Chiton muscosus. 75. A comparison of the shells of the N. W. and S. W. shores of America offers certain remarkable points of identity. The standard limpet of the northern seas is Acm@a patina. On reaching the Gulf, it is replaced by A. mesoleuca, which probably extends through the Panamic province. But when we approach Chili, we again find the A. patina in D’Orbigny’s collec- tions, and it is figured by Mr. Reeve as though brought by Cuming. Indeed if the Chilian and Californian specimens were mixed, it would be impossible to separate them by the shells alone. It is true that Philippi, recognizing some of Eschscholtz’s Sitchian species as southern forms, accuses the latter of mixing the labels; but probably they occur in each fauna. The Seurria mitra also, though somewhat more local, is a very abundant shell on both coasts. The Acmea cassis of Eschscholtz appears only a northern reproduc- tion of the Patagonian Patella deaurata, Gmel. The Fissurrella violascens, Esch., is assigned by him to the south, to which in type it belongs; but it has some claims on the northern fauna for admission. The Bullia ampullacea, Midd., is essentially a southern type, especially abounding in peninsulas; of its specific relations we are not yet able to judge. The Natica caurina of Gould, appears a geographical creation for the southern J. impervia of Philippi ; while of the Oregonian Scalaria, Dr. Gould confesses that he has” « ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 349 séen no marks by which it can be separated from S. australis, though he expects that some will be eliminated hereafter. 76. The Uprer CAtirornian district presents a very peculiar assemblage of shells ; essentially of a temperate cast, but including a few forms of tropical type. The leading species are as follow, including several which also make their way into Oregon and Lower California :— Discina Evansii. - Pholadidea penita. Parapholas Californica. Petricola Californica. Rupellaria lamellifera. Saxidomus Petitii and Nuttalli. Platyodon cancellatus. Cryptodon Nuttalli. Spheenia Californica. Thracia curta. Mytilimeria Nuttalli. Pandora punctata. Machera Nuttalli. Solecurtus subteres and Californicus. Sanguinolaria grandis. Tellina Bodegensis, secta and alta. Donax flexuosus and Californicus. Mactra Californica and planulata. Trigona crassatelloides. Dosinia. callosa. Bulla nebulosa. Tornatina culcitella and cerealis. Lepidochiton Mertensii and scrobiculata, Mopalia Simpsonii. Chitonidz Nuttalli, ornatus, Monte- reyensis, Hartwegii. Nacella depicta and incessa. Acmeea scabra and toreuma. Fissurella ornata and volcano. Lucapina crenulata. Haliotis, 5 sp. Trochus filosus. Omphalius aureotinctus. Trochiscus Norrisii. Crepidula rugosa. Aletes squamigerus. Litorina planaxis. Trivia Californica. Defrancia bella. Conus ravus. q Venus Nuttalli. _ Tapes straminea. Trapezium Californicum. Chama exogyra. Diplodonta orbella. Kellia Laperousii. Mytilus Californianus and bifurcatus. Modiola recta and nitens. Nucula ccelata. Leda polita. Isognomon costellatus. Pecten latiauratus. Odostomia gravida. Chemnitzia tenuicula and torquata. Neverita Recluziana. Mitra maura. Marginella Jewetii. Purpura macrostoma and harpa. Monoceros engonata and lapilloides. Nitidella Gouldii. Columbella carinata and StaBarbarensis, Nassa perpingius. Cerastoma Nuttalli. __ The total number of mollusks known to inhabit this district, excluding most of those of which the habitat is only loosely stated as “California,” &c., is as _ follows :—Bryozoa, 1; Palliobranchs,2; Lamellibranchs, 73; Ordinary Gaste- ropoda, 100; Toxifera, 2; Proboscidifera, 24: Total, 202. Of these there have only as yet been found common also to Lower California (San Diego to Cape _ St. Lucas), Bryozca, 0; Palliobranchs, 0; Lamellibranchs, 27 ; Ordinary _ Gasteropeda, 23; Toxifera, 0; Proboscidifera, 6: Total, 56; but as scarcely 140 species are as yet known from that region, it is next to certain that the common species will be hereafter found much more numerous. Of the compara- tively small assemblage known from Upper California, containing next to no _ pelagic forms and only about half-a-dozen minute species, it will be observed how large a proportion are bivalves, and how few proboscideans; also how _ much larger the proportion of the widely extended species is in the former _ than in the latter group. A very few, as Cultellus lucidus and Lyonsia _ Californica, are perhaps identical with North Atlantic shells; but in general _ there is a wide disagreement. Here are found the largest species of Parapholas and Trigona; and the types of Platyodon, Cryptodon, Mytilimeria and 850 REPORT—1856. Saxidomus. The tendency of the Muricide and Purpuride to assume the acanthoid type, is well known, both in these and the West Southern shores. The Lithophagus Gruneri rests on tolerably satisfactory evidence from New Zealand as well as from Monterey. The wide-spread Sérigilla carnaria, even more like the usual Caribbean type than are the Mazatlan specimens, here appears in tolerable abundance ; while even the Livona pica is stated to have been found alive. Of course it may retain a lingering existence in the upper seas, as Lucina tigerrina in the lower, while on the coast bordering on the Caribbean it has died out; but it is more natural at present to suppose it an error. For the Litiopa divisa, an East Indian pelagic shell, said to have been found on “ Cape San Francisco,” a locality of the same name occurs near the Bay of Guayaquil. The sudden appearance of Haliotide, of great size and beauty, in the temperate shores of West N. America, is very remarkable. Not a single specimen occurred in the vast Reigen collection, nor have any been taken in Central America, or in South America, the head-quarters of Chitonide. On crossing the Pacific Ocean, however, we find that Japan, which represents the same zone on the Asiatic coast, is equally rich in beau- tiful forms. The following species are quoted from *. JAPAN. CALIFORNIA. Haliotis Japonica, Rve. Haliotis splendens, Rve. — gigantea, Chemn. corrugata, Gray. discus, Rve. Cracherodii, Leach. —— Siebaldii, Rve. — Californiensis, Swains. —— aquatilis, Rye. rufescens, Swains. Two of the Asiatic species, H. aquatilis, Rve., and H. Kamtschathana, Jonas, stretch upwards within the bounds of the Polar fauna in Behring’s Sea; while the latter appears to have crossed the waters, and to have found its way sparingly down the American coast. "7. Of the fauna of Lowzr CALIFoRNIA, meaning the peninsula from San Diego to Cape St. Lucas, one of the most interesting portions in the American coast, but the least thoroughly investigated, very little is known, and that little but inaccurately. The shells of San Diego, as collected by Nuttall, are almost entirely distinct from those of the Gulf. Most of them belong to the Upper Californian type, but several fresh species make their appear- ance, which are still distinct from the Mazatlan fauna. This ground was well searched by Messrs. Kellett and Wood; and it is probable, though the evidence is very slight, that many of the peculiar shells of their expedition, such as Hinnites giganteus, Pseudoliva Kellettii, &c., were obtained in this district. The little that is known accurately of the peninsula, shows that the stations on both shores of the Gulf belong essentially to the Panamic type; those within the Gulf being even more tropical than those at the mouth; as evidenced by Oliva porphyria, Cassis coarctata, Oniscia tuberculosa, Terebra robusta, and other Panama species not found in the Reigen collection: while the Bay of Magdalena and other stations in the Pacific are peopled, prin- cipally by the Californian colony moving southwards, and stopped at the Cape by the upward equatorial current ; partly by Gulf shells making their way round the corner; and partly, it seems, by a special little fauna of its own. It will be an abundant recompense for the labour of this Report, if it should lead any careful naturalist to make a diligent search of the district, both as to its shore shells and its pelagic species; making accurate notes at the time what species are taken alive and what dead; in what circumstances and quantities; and with such precautions as shall effectually guard against all i A et ' ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 351. chances of error. We. shall then know, and not satisfactorily till then, where and how the two great faunas of West N. America, both of which go loosely by the name of “ Californian,” find their separation. The imperfect data of the Pacific coast of Lower California only furnish us with Palliobranchs, 1; Lamellibranchs, 60; ordinary Gasteropods, 49 ; Toxifera, 7; Proboscidifera, 20: total 137 species. As the localities are so far from being satisfactorily established, an exact analysis of them will not here be attempted: but the fauna of each spot will be given entire so far as known, both on the Pacific shores and in the Gulf. The species marked * belong to the Californian type ; those marked + to the Panamic. -- The following list contains the known shells of San D1rEGo :— F i % _~ _ a 4 % Pholadidea ovoidea. penita. *Parapholas Californica. Saxicava Pholadis, *Petricola Californica. *Saxidomus Nuttalli. *Platyodon cancellatus. *Sphenia Californica. *Lyonsia Californica. Periploma argentaria. *Solecurtus subteres. he Californianus. Sanguinolaria Nuttalli. Psammobia Pacifica. *Tellina nasuta. *_—_— secta. a pura. yicina. Cumingia Californica. *Semele decisa. . flavescens. . rubrolineata. *Donax Californicus. *Venus Nuttalli. *—— Californiana. excayvata, dispar. fluctifraga. *Tapes straminea. *Trigona crassatelloides. *Cardium Nuttalli. *, *. Californiense. *. substriatum. T elatum. luteolabrum. Cypricardia Californica. _*Chama exogyra. _ =— pellucida. _*Diplodonta orbella. TLucina punctata. bella. ~ Californica. —— Nuttall. TLithophagus attenuatus. *Mytilus Californianus. Modiola capax. Arca pernoides. ~*Pecten latiauritus. Pecten floridus. purpuratus. + Ostrea conchaphila. T plumula. Hinnites giganteus. *Helix tudiculata. e Kellettii. Bulimus pallidior. +Melampus olivaceus. Haminea vesicula. *Bulla nebulosa. virescens. longinqua. Tornatina inculta. Mopalia Blainvillei. *Acmeea patina. persona. grandis. . spectrum. * scabra. fascicularis. *Fissurella voleano. *Haliotis Californiensis. *, Cracherodii. i splendens. . *Osilinus ater. *Trochus filosus. *Omphalius aureotinctus, *. brunneus. *Phasianella compta. +Turbo Fokkesii. +Petaloconchus macrophragma. *Cerithidea saerata, albonodosa. pullata. TNatica uber. Ranella triquetra. ~—— muriciformis. — Californica. +[Oliva splendidula]. Purpura emarginata. Columbella carinata. »—— Californica. +Nassa luteostoma. fossata. T—— tegula. Murex Belcheri, 352 REPORT—1856. The following shells are quoted from San PEDRO :— Sanguinolaria Nuttalli. *Semele rubrotincta. *Tellina secta. Mactra nasuta. *Venus Nuttalli. fructifraga. Californiensis. *Tapes straminea. gracilis. *Diplodonta orbella *Chama exogyra. *Bulla nebulosa. +Acmza mesoleuca. The following shells are quoted from GuayMAs. Southern fauna, except Bulla nebulosa and longs to that of Upper California. It may b not dissimilar Tapes histrionica. Periploma plamiuscula. {Petricola robusta. +Venus Columbiensis. Pecten circularis. *Bulla nebulosa. Cardium cruentatum. Pectunculus giganteus. *Acmea scabra. *Scurria mitra. *Trochus meestus. +Crepidula incurva. +Calyptreea spinosa. }Litorina ? fasciata. Oliva biplicata. They all belong to thé Venus straminea, which last be- e a wrong determination for the Omphalius rugosus. Terebra variegata. Conus ferrugatus. Californiensis. Lophyrus levigatus. t regularis. * straminea. albolineatus. +Natica maroccana. Tapes grata. tAcmza mesoleuca. bifasciata. Cardita Californica. +Neritina picta. Fusus pallidus. Chama f, Mexicana. +Nerita Bernhardi. Cardium elatum. The following shells are quoted from Sa —— lignarius. N JUAN; many others are pro- bably from the same place, but are assigned by error to the Straits of the same name in Oregon. +Sanguinolaria purpurea. | tTerebra fulgurata. +Olivella tergina. Tellina gemma. +Conus princeps. ? eburnea. *Donax Californicus. -fOniscia tuberculosa. Monoceros tuberculatum. Bulimus pallidior. Cassis coarctata. +Purpura muricata. +Radius variabilis. Olivella intorta. +Murex plicatus. The following are quoted from La Paz:— Thracia plicata. TMactra elegans. Venus reticulata, Dione Chionza. Artemis gigantea. Petricola dactylus. +Lucina punctata. Modiola capax. fIsognomon Chemnitzianum. Lima tetrica. Pecten nodosus. dentatus. Spondylus, sp. +Ostrea Cumingiana. +Cancellaria obesa. +—— solida. T cassidiformis. Sigaretus debilis. +Strombus gracilior. tOliva porphyria. T splendidula. +Purpura patula. ‘3 emarginata. +t—— biserialis. +—— hosquiformis. +Murex bicolor. 78. A mere glance at the general Table, contrasting the species on each side of the double central dividing line, especially leaving out of view the un- certain column of Lower California, will satisfy the inquirer of the marked and rapid separaticn between the two faunas of California-proper and the Gulf. The actual difference is, however, much greater than the apparent, since the name of a species occurs in a column if only one specimen has been obtained, whether or not it were living there; or if living, whether it were an habitual resident or a straggler. For it will be observed that our present lists are much in the condition of those of British shells, before the labours’ of the dredging naturalists of our own day ; when a W. Indian shell was duly my ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 353 entered on the fauna, if it could be shown to have been picked up on British sands. There are two main sources of information for the comparison of the faunas :—(1.) The collections of Mr. Nuttall and M. Reigen; and (2.) those of the Mexican War naturalists. Now with every respect for the labours of the latter gentlemen, who doubtless did the very best that it was possible for them to do under their peculiar circumstances, we hesitate before we receive from that source alone results at variance with the former. And for this simple reason; that Mr. Nuttall did not travel further south than San Diego, nor did M. Reigen pass beyond the district of Mazatlan: while the officers were moving from place to place, and liable to the errors _ that even peacable naturalists may make under such circumstances. As the _ results of their collections have been carefully tabulated above, those who _ place implicit reliance upon them can easily add to the lists accordingly : but __ We think it a sufficient ground for hesitation, that no less an authority than Dr. Gould had formed the opinion, judging from these collections alone, that _ Mazatlan belonged to the Californian rather than the Panamic type; the _ contrary of which is abundantly proved by the Reigen collection. It appears _ also that Prof. Adams entertained the same doubts, though he does not ex- _ press them; for while he quotes the war-naturalists for seven of his Panama ' species as inhabiting Upper California, he says in his introduction that none of the species of the province inhabit San Diego, which is at the borders of Lower California. The following are the species common to Mr. Nuttall’s and M. Reigen’s collections, the specimens quoted from the latter being all that were found out of several myriads of shells. Californian Fauna. Species. Gulf Fauna. Not uncommon......... 1. Strigilla carnaria........ Peace Not common. Typical ...........s.c000e 2. Cumingia Californica ......... Very rare. Typical and abundant .| 3. Trigonella crassatelloides ...|Two minute dead valves, possibly the fry of this species. MVPICAl ..c,.0sessoecees 4, Chama exogyra ........ Oeoae One pair and a valve, probably of this species. ' {One young sp. ......... 5. —— (frondosa) Mexicana ...|Typical. ‘|? Rare........ Been tacoas 6. Modiola capax .........s0s.0000 Very rare. _ {Not uncommon......... 7. Ostrea conchaphila & plumula|Very common. BEG PICALy .osscosseescresees 8. Bulla nebulosa ...............65 A very few, resembling B. nebu- losa, but possibly =B. Adamsi, var. Typical, very abundant| 9. Acmzea patina ............00000 2 sp. (? ballast). Typical, very abundant}10, —— persona ............0see0e 1 sp. (? ballast). _|Typical, local............ 11. —— scabra .....s...eseeeeesenee 1 sp. (? ballast). BPVETY TATE .cccce.cscsceee 12. Crucibulum spinosum ......... Typical, widely diffused. Dwarf var., common...|13. Crepidula aculeata ............ ,.|Typical, widely diffused. Extremely 1 TAL sesseeees 14. Hipponyx Grayanus. ......... Extremely rare. SEES eReer oreo 15. Petaloconchus macrophragma|Typical, common. 2 Var. Californica ...... 16. Natica maroccana .......0+... Var. Pritchardt. In this list nos. 3, 4, 8 & 16 are doubtful.. Nos. 9, 10 & 11 appear to be stragglers. _ Nos. 1, 2,6,7 & 13 honestly belong to both faunas, and are forms of wide geographical extent ; the few remaining being creatures of sedentary habits, that are easily transported from place to place. Out of the 694 __ 79. The following table will give an abstract of what is now known of the “Mexico- Peruvian fauna, grouped in families and in columns according to their . 1856. 2A % 7 ao’ oP 354 E REPORT—1856. pas TION AD . distribution. A. Species as yet only known from the Gulf, including Maz- atlan and St. Blas.—B. Species found in the Gulf and Central America, from Acapulco to Gulf Dulce—C. Gulf and Panama.—D. Gulf and S. America.—E. Gulf and Galapagos.—F. Tota Guir.—G. Central Ame- rica, peculiar—H. Central America and Panama.—I. Central America and S. America.—K. Panama, peculiar.—L. Panama and S. America—M. ToraLt Panama.—N. TOTAL of N. American tropical fauna. Families, &c. A.| B.| C.|D.| E. | F. || G.|H.] 1. |] K.|-L. | M. || N. PR VOLO Meter csss ee stccts Aetecesces RGlveee|| se seth ces] LUl| vans | ee ee TUNICATA ..........4. hae. oe F dalle Anaath Mees PALLIOBRANCHIATA ...,.........] .2-| oes 11) a | a Br ee a ca | ee TOtAN, A RR, 16 eat 17 is } 1 LAMELLIBRANCHIATA. PHOlagige o ascsseehecdsseis DA ie Pa a2 fo at Bil a 5 ALLS eed ag Gastrocheenide ............| .. ali ea 2 ee 2). 2 NANICHVINCE Y sasetsencescess\" ess[t see oe ees | eae 11) pie § Petricolida .......se00e0+ LO} Ral ade; aah aa 2} 2! Myad2e —..cssessscers jo Oivcas cd feos Wat) oes seal Al Gal eed) ae PRRs, oat Corbulidie ty svescctudecetis 3} 5) 7) 3] ...| 10] 4] 6) 5 6] 3) 14 ATIALINIGES Wyaersseecesessses co a WBA FT RA a) | RR 1 NR NS | 9° ae Pree Soleni@ieis — 7. cccssccsoeet ass eet (ieee eres seeltiass| eae iY yer hag Soletuehidte-stscsectcre sees 7 he a es Ia 5 | ime We Une | ey f= 1 DeHinidrth. oo. :ss2scaceces 23) 4) Of 6) ...| 39]) 8! 5) 41 23] 11) 41 MVONTNCIUIS “reste ene eres ae Pel Wie) umes Aa: | i Uae me | mae ee § Cet emi! | fom Mactridee nen 1) aoe Rega Ue Va IAT ie) ecccy Imereti ll ke Veneridze...05t sis vbeen ss 9) 13]-14| 17) ...) 34]} 2) 8} 12]| 6) 10) 21 AStAPtIGE oo. sckecseccceees GPR Sap ze 7 tae] (ingle Red) tes) ee edn, Chamide .... 1 4 Pa ee Ole I ate ec ee Cardiadz 10) 3). 4) 4b ee) EWS ALES Sheath pe ate 7 Lucinide & Diplodontide| 15} 1} 2) 2| ...) 19]} 3) ...)... Hy Ales Kelliadae: <..c0.ctesevecnbas sal Ls) A bas We bladed iP 4] | ener Ae ye? Cycladide <...08 2h ties: oS fee 4 Poa ha |e 8 ees fc RS ke Unionides oie. tee fe ee ie os be : A Sy Se Wolo) | tds sc eae My tilide9>. NP... 22k t. An 4) 3) 5) Qh) QP VB Ve seshh: Of ATOAREE HN. AWA: POR OV 7) TO) AL a Jali Gara ae Nuculidlse: (sig. 5<<-titce ose meat Dy $l evo 2H Ue a Oi) aes oy Aviculidse Whessis uk isles Wee) ees) fo te Wyo U2 Be Pectinidse Wii cidi.tbasivecue Ge Uesscte TS TOL Sra ay SS Spondylide ............00 vee eee 9 eee ba 3H} 3]... 2) sf 3! Ostreade Haiti Javea: 2}. SST See ee Bh ss.) 5} ANIOMIACH 5. wwesdicecces Bee dt preps ANA] Soup = DiS Da Total: Wiss eae 141} 56} 83} 60} 2/266)| 41] 47) 40|) 76) 62/189] 423) — PREROPODA. vessevseesticvssessceses sotheaadl sac betesshe wwalreeel] cea aes ieee GASTEROPODA. aaa tat ae ra aes Gy eer] EVO. yeaa eee ere ee onata. Geophila +... .c.csce..003.. 4) 2) ...] ooof cool Gi] 6) 21 4.1 8 Limnophila ............... Al, ice) aas bee Sell ise PL faethe essa Thalassophila .........64. UPL ieee Uk a) li. ay Total tua. sects esse. 15) res | a) | i | i so} Me YP a 3 * This figure includes Montacuta chalcedonica, found in the fronds of Murex nigritus — (Reigen Col.), since the Table was printed, 4 Families, &c. - Prosobranchiata. ' HETEROPODA. Tanthinide ...... auaee sate LATERIBRANCHIATA, Dentaliade .......... a sla.cd ScUTIBRANCHIATA. ; Ciittonidas 7... <.geseeraeess as Patellidz Acmeide ....... Rec taNee Ney Fissurellidze ...,....,.0+00. Haliotidte ...cccccescgeeeeee Trochide ... Neritidge PECTINIBRANCHIATA. Rostrifera. Naricidee Calyptrzidz Capulide .. Vermetide....., “epee tat Turritellidee Cerithiade Melaniadze Paludinidz Ampullariade .... Cyclostomidze Truncatellidee Litorinidz Rissoidee Lacunide Jeffreysiada: .,...,..... Ay Planaxide.,,,..., sna (OD ET FeV ae ee leant eae Cypreide Caneellariadz Strombide Terebridee .........0. thentee Pleurotomide ..... o> Size Proboscidifera. Solariadze sreeereereepeneeee] see Pyramidellide ,..,.,.....- Eulimide Cerithiopsidze Scalariade Naticide PYTETTTy) seaetepeee Velutinidse:-: 5 sssedsaves Lamellariade Ficulide Carried forward ... ON: MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMBRICA. : _ ©. OMmom oo ne it~) a S: : Nwnhk oer 355 356 REPORT—1856. Families, &c. A.|B.| C.|D.| E.| F. || G.|H.| I. || K.] L. | M.]| N (Proboscidifera, continued)...... 81} 9} 19} 4} 2/105) 8] 6) 3/| 30] 4) 52) 146 Doltadee caches capnasecrscese eel Meaa||waee|, ves bree ly swell ewelaea ae lj} 1 1 Cassidae ..cctesascooscsisesees Fel (de ty 70) 30) 56) 21) 8)131)} 13} 29) 18]| 47} 34)118)| 213 Total Toxiferdses..sc0s.ssereoveds. 22! 15/ 17| 8} 1} 47/| 31) 20) 11)| 31) 17} 68); 140 Total Pectinibranchiata ......... 235! 90|140} 53] 19)411)\| 85/101) 47||160) 92/385|| 770 Total Scutibranchiata, &c....... 63) 12} 15} 4] 5) 91)| 10) 11) 8]| 30) 9} 61); 148 Total Opisthobranchiata and) 15} 4} 3) 2} 2) 23) 6) 6) 1} 22) 1) 31; 58 Pulmonata. | Total Gasteropoda .......++++000 313)106|158) 59) 26}525|101)118) 56||212/102/477|| 976 | CEPHALOPODA(...02..-sesscccecsee oaglh ven| Cocdl ‘nud coals tech oases|inetnal toast RBeen Metealice cell imusem Total Lamellibranchiata......... 141) 56] 83) 60} 2/266) 41] 47] 40|| 76) 62|189)| 423 Total Palliobranchiata & Bryo-| 16) ...) 1} 1] ...] 17|| ...] 06] scoff eoe| 1] Ui} 17 zoa. Toray Fauna, Gulf to Panama'470)162|242)120} 28/808)|142)165| 96)|288|165|667|\1416 80. Now let it be carefully borne in mind that every column of this résumé is, without doubt, very far from the actual truth. Whatever may be learnt from it must be estimated positively, and by no means negatively. #.g. not- withstanding the scrutinizing researches of Cuming, C. B. Adams, Hinds, Bridges and others in the Bay of Panama, and our almost complete ignorance of all parts of the Gulf except its entrance, 808 species are quoted from the latter and only 697 species from the former, giving a balance of 111 species in favour of the northern station. Now when it is borne in mind that Panama is in the central tropical region, that it receives both the North American species as they travel southwards, and the South American as they move upwards, besides (in all probability) a little nest of bay shells peculiar to its own quiet haunts; while the Gulf fauna receives scarcely any importations from the north, and only those southern forms of life which are capable of subsisting at the very borders or beyond the tropies; it must be evident that much more has to be done before even the central portion has been brought up to its proper standing. Then let it be remembered how many species must be yet unknown in the Gulf district. Large as is our acquaintance with the minute species, as the whole of it has been obtained by ransacking the worm-eaten passages of a few Chame and Spondyli, and examining the dirt on the backs of other shells, what may be expected when the shores and sea-bed have been subjected to the minute examination of a Barlee, an Alder, or a Bean! In the British fauna, 170 out of 511 species are minute. It might have been thought that degeneration of size was a condition of high latitudes ; but wherever attention has been paid, the tropical seas are found ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 357 ‘as rich in the minuter forms of life as are those that wash colder shores, or even more so. Till the time of D’Orbigny, no one in the tropics seemed to deign to bend his attention to what the amateur collector did not. value; but Prof. Adams has already described many small species from Jamaica, and 80 from Panama, the latter simply by the examination of dead drift. In __ these days of microscopic observation, most interesting results may be anti- cipated if only dredgers will bring back labelled parcels of fine siftings from _ deep waters; and ordinary collectors, sieved sand or mud from the shores. If shells were packed in the sieved sand of the place; if they were always sent home in the rough ; if those who decorticate their backs with acid, thus destroying the minute microscopic sculpture which is often the best guide for the discrimination of species, would only first brush them without acid, and send the bottoms of the wash bowl to some microscopical malacologist, taking care to wash only the shells from one spot at a time, and not to mix the dirt; we should soon acquire a knowledge of molluscan distribution which would advance the science by rapid strides. Here do not apply many of the sources of error common to larger shells. Ballast can scarcely mix its anomalous transportations with the Caca, Vitrinelle and Chemnitzie in the interior of an oyster; and the facts of distribution are as accurately seen in these minuter forms as in the history of Cones and Olives. The remark made by one of our very foremost naturalists, when it was first proposed to investigate the Mazatlan shells, was that it was not likely that there should be anything new among them; as the large shells would be all the same as Mr. Cuming’s, and the small ones as those of Prof. Adams. And yet, com- paring the 314 small species from Mazatlan with the 80 described from Pa- nama, only 28 appear identical. The Caecum jfirmatum, which is the abun~ dant Panama form, is extremely rare at Mazatlan, where it is replaced by the beautiful and still more abundant C. undatum, of which only one minute specimen was perhaps found at Panama. Of the principal Panamic Vitrinella, only one individual was found at Mazatlan; where it is replaced by the shell first termed V. clathrata, which turns out tu be the same of which an aberrant variety was imperfectly named and described from Panama as V. parva. And so in other instances, as in the larger shells ; Chemnitzie being always rare in individuals, fruitful in species, with many of a wide range; Odostomie _ not yet found at Panama; Chrysallida communis, a coast shell, and very abundant in both districts, while the other species from deeper water are rare and local; Bullide and small Marginelle, diffused; Rissoide, local ; and so on in ways on which it would be pleasant but not safe yet to gene- ralize. As the same large Spondylus which furnished the Mazatlan minutiz is also found in Panama Bay, where it is dived-for by the natives to burn for lime, with all its Parapholades, Gastrochene, Lithophagi and other rich treasures, travellers in that region would do service to science by bringing home a few valves, that it may be found how far the small nestlers correspond, as the boring bivalves are known to do. _ But even with regard to the large shells, the distribution of many species is anything but satisfactorily made-out. The fauna of the Central American seas has never been properly published. A variety of new species are de- - scribed from Messrs. Cuming’s and Hinds’ collections, but of the old shells found in the same stations we are left in ignorance. The practice of describing only new species from voyages, instead of giving complete lists of those found, very unnecessarily retards our geographical knowledge. The quotations om Acapulco are like those from Dorsetshire or Guernsey in the old | British writers. What we yet know makes it far from improbable that while one great type of shells extends at least from Guaymas to the Bay of Guaya- 358 REPORT—1856. quil, each portion (the upper Gulf, the Gulf mouth, 8. W. Mexico, Central America proper, the Bay of Panama, the N. W. shores of South America, and the Galapagos,) has its peculiar species, or at least those which culminate in that locality. A large number, especially those which are also common to the Galapagos, are found on the whole length of coast, wherever there is a suitable station; while others, perhaps nearly related species, are very local. Thus the beautiful Venus gnidia is found wherever there is a muddy bottom to protect its delicate frills, (Hinds); while the V.amathusia, so near that by Gray and even Deshayes it is regarded as identical, has only yet been found in a typical state at Mazatlan, straggling and of modified form below. The Dione lupinaria is in extreme profusion at Mazatlan, and also found far down the coast of South America; but the D. brevispinosa, which resembles it with blunted spines, has not yet come to light except from the Gulf. But we must check these comparisons, 80 interesting to those who have made them a imatter of study ; and which, if developed, even according to our present knowledge, would fill a volume. Nor would a history of even the Atlantic waters, furnish materials for one more interesting and instructive. 81. One fact however is deserving of special notice. On comparing the shells of the Gulf and South America, we obtain the following results Out of 143 Gulf Bivalves, 50 are found in South America, or 1 out of 2'86. Out of 490 Gulf Univalves, only 89 have been found in South America, or 1 out of 55; while of the 151 Gulf Proboscideans, only 14 are yet known from South America, or 1 out of 10°8. This may be accounted for partly by the fact that the bivalves cast their spawn loose into the sea, while the uni- valves, which have larger locomotive powers, generally affix their eggs to shells and stones. (Gray.) Accordingly, the Lamellibranchiate fry are borne on in the direction of the current, and are found far beyond what may fairly be cotisidered the limits of the species. This further accounts for the absence of sone South American bivalves from Panama which are however found at Mazatlan; the fry, with the current, not sweeping into the bay, but landing on the Mexican coast. It is confirmed by finding the young of many South Ameri¢an species in the sand of Mazatlan, which are not known there in the adult state. Only two bivalves are quoted from Mazatlan and the Gala- pagos (one of these, Modiola capawx, a Gulf and Californian species, having probably been added in error from Kellett’s voyage); that group being out of the current which we may suppose to convey species fron Guayaquil to. the northern shores. How far the Gulf species, or those of Panama, extend on the South American coast, we aré not yet able to state with any confidence. Most of Mr. Cuming’s recorded South American species are from Ecuador and Columbia; and D’Orbigny’s collections are too scanty, especially in pelagic species, for much comparison. It seems probable that but few reach Callao, and extremely few the coasts of Chili. A few indeed are quoted as far south as the Island of Chiloe, but (except in the widely distributed forms, such as Calyptraide) they need confirmation; as do also the appearance of Crepidula nivea (Les- sonii) and Lyonsia picta, both southern forms, at Vancouver's Island. 82. A comparison with the shells of the Galapagos Islands offers points of peculiar interest. They are known to us by the researches of Messrs. Cuming and Darwin, the latter of whom has given a most graphic picture of their peculiarities in his ‘Journal of Researches,’ pp. 145, 162. Collections have also been made there by Messrs. Kellett and Wood; but for reasons before. stated, less dependence should be placed on them. _ Unfortunately, though. ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 359 _ previous results have been tabulated, the materials have not been made ‘public. Mr. Cuming prepared a list of 90 sea shells for Mr. Darwin’s use, but it has been mislaid; nor can Mr. Darwin furnish any additional infor- mation, having unfortunately distributed his valuable collections before they were geographically tabulated. The following list has been constructed from one most kindly drawn out for this Report by Mr. Cuming, with as much completeness as his extremely limited time allowed; with the addition of species tabulated in the Monographs, and a few from the Pandora Voyage. It is probable that some species have been overlooked from “ Hood’s Island,” which appears both in the Galapagos group and in the central Pacific: both of them are quoted in the Monographs as “‘ Lord Hood’s Island,” and they are very rarely distinguished from each other. List of Galapagos Shells. In this table, stations in America are marked in columns to the left; 4. Mazatlan and G. the Gulf; C. 4. Central America; P. Panama; and S. 4. South America; while Pacific stations are recorded to the right, Species. Station. Pacific Localities, Gastrochzena rugulosa, Sow. brevis, Sow. ........s000 Al SabeUe BewiGhas cache. Society Islands. hyalina, Sow. .........++- In Avicule, 3-7 fin. Petricola amygdalina, Sow... Semele rupium, Sow. ...........+ reefs & rocks. punctata, Sow. Cardita varia, Brod. .....0.....+ fine sand, 6 fm. —— incrassata. Chama imbricata, Brod.......... Avicule, \1.w.~7. \Pearl Island. Janus, Rve.* .......ccceeees on Avicula. Modioela capax, Conr. [?]. Crehella coarctata, Dkr. Byssoarca truncata, Sow. ...... stones & dvicule. |\Society Islands. Pecten magnificus, Sow. ......... coral sand, 6-17 fm. Lima arcuata*. Anomia adamas, Gray ......... on Avicule. Bulla Quoyi, Gray. rufolabris, 4. 4d. a \Bulimus nux, Brod. .........+6 on bushes. & |—— verrucosus, Pfr. c unifasciatus, Sow. .......0. under lava. d rugulosus, Sow. e |—— Eschariferus, Sow. J |—— Darwinii, Pfr. g \—— Achatinellinus, Fordes. h incrassatus, Pfr. 2 |—— ustulatus, Sow. .....ess.00. on lava. k J m n 0 Dp q tin 8 t —— Calyus, Sow. ...ccc..sss0e0e dry grass. —— Jacobi, Sow. ......se-csece. under scoriz. —— Chemnitzioides, Fordes. —— corneus, Sow. —— sculpturatus, Pfr. —— rugiferus, Sow. ......s00008 under scorie. —— nucula, Pfr. —— Galapaganus, Pfr. —— Manini, Pfr. Helix) Apise. s.35.0e8. as anke iS aeapelbees parbeswoneesss heb 5 Sandw.I.( Darwin). Siphonaria gigas, Sow. —— scutellum. & * Chama spinosa (M., C. A.) and Lima Pacifica (C. A., P., S. A.), are also quoted from Lord Hood’s Island,” and are probably Galapagian species, 4 360 ; REPORT—1856. American Localities. | No. Species. Station. Pacific Localities. 20 |Lophyrus Goodallii, Brod....... under stones, I. w. 21 sulcatus, Wood ..........0. under stones, l. w. S.A.| 22 |?Chiton hirundiniformis, Sow...) under stones, 1. w. M. |C.A.| P.|......| 23 |Acmeea striata, Rve. 24 (Fissurella mutabilis, Sow. 25 obscura, Sow......++.++++...|under stones, shore. Moieeewss lib cles sree 26 TUQOSA, SOW. ..-.0esseereeee under stones, l. w. C. A.|-P. |S. A.| 27 macrotrema, Sow. .........Junder stones, shore. C.A.| P.|S.A.| 28 |—— nigropunctata, Sow. ....../stones & rks. $-t.— Ma|G. Az) 2%. ' lies 0. 29 |Glyphis inzequalis (+-pica),Sow.| u. s., shore—8 fm. P. |......| 30 |Turbo squamigera, Rve. ........- 7 fm. 31 |Nerita sp., Kellett § Wood. S.A.| 32 |Calyptraca varia, Brod. .........|..00sececvesecvees ..>+-./Society Islands, MG AS Baie... 33 |Hipponyx Grayanus, Mke....... on stones, ]. w. Mi IC TAs sea cccas 34 |Cerithium stercus-muscarim,..| sand pools, }-t. M. |C.A.) P.|......| 35 |——— maculosum, Kien. .........| under stones, 3-t. Met cela! noes 36 interruptum, Mfe..........| under stones, $-t. 37 |Litorina porcata, Phil. ......... exposed rocks. v |Paludina, sp. ..-..sssseeeee ab ytees|cOeedorsvevevencevoean ds Tahiti& V.Diemen’s Land (Darwin). Ve Rear 38 |Planaxis planicostata, Sow....... u. s., $-t.—h. w. S.A.| 39 |Luponia nigropunctata, Gray...| under stones. M. |......| -.. |......| 40 |Trivia pulla, Gask. C.A.|...|......] 41 |—— Pacifica, Gray ............ under stones. MST Si geos| Meee ceee 42 |—— (sanguinolenta, var.) fusca, Gray. C.A.|...|......| 43 |—— suffusa, Gray. 13] ee 44 rubescens, Gray.........06 under stones. 45 |—— Maugerie, Gray ......... under stones. Bae 46 |Cancellaria chrysostoma, Sow. .| sand, 8-10 fm. 47 |—— hemastoma, Sow. ......... sand, 10-16 fm. M. |C.A.| P. |S. A.| 48 |Strombus granulatus, Swains...jsandy mud, 6-8 fm. 12 Pe 49 |Terebra ornata, Gray.......... ..(coral sand, 5-7 fm. 50 |Myurella frigata, Hinds. DP aleeraed 51 |Drillia excentrica, Sow. .........| coral sand, 6 fm. Paleo 52 |—— bicolor, Sow. ......- eee sand, 8 fm. 53 |—— rugifera, Sow....... seateanes coral sand, 6 fm. 54 |—— albicostata, Sow. .........| coral sand, 6 fm. 55 |—— splendidula, Sow. ......... coral sand, 6 fm. \ Aer lecesect be cose 56. |Conus nux, Brod. .........c.c00: ? shore, 1. w. P. |S. A.| 57 brunneus, Wood.......... ..{clefts of rocks, 1. w. 58 |—— tiaratus=minimus, Linn..| sand pools, ]. w. |East Indies. 59 |—— varius =interruptus, Wood|clefts of rocks, 1. w.|Philippines. | 60 |—— diadema, Sow. ............ clefts of rocks, 1. w. 61 |—— Luzonicus, var. Sow.......\clefts of rocks, 1. w.|Philippines. 62 |Stylifer astericola, Brod. ...... in Asterias solaris, 63 |Cirsotrema diadema*, Sow. MS AG s7AG Pits seek « 64 |Natica maroccana, Chemn.......|... etaee est ss Meomeeees “All over the warm climate,’ Cuming. M. |C.A.) P.|......) 65 |Lunatia Galapagosa ( = otis, coral sand. Zool. Beech. Voy.). MiGRA Ro ices. 66 |Oniscia tuberculosa, Sow. ...... clefts of rocks, 1. w. 67 xanthostoma, 4. Ad. 68 {Cassis tenuis, Wood ............ sandy mud, 6 fm. G. |C.A.| P.|......| 69 |—— coarctata, Sow. ............ crevices of rocks. 70 |Triton reticulatus, Dillw.=tur- 6 fm. Quoted from Medi- riculatus, Desh. terranean. 71 |—— Sowerbyi=lineatus,Brod.| sandy mud, 6 fm. 72 |—— pictus, Rve.......... +eessseee| under stones, 1. w. 73 |—— clandestinus, Chemn. * Closely resembles C, funiculata from Mazatlan and Panama; at first thought identical by Mr. Cumjng ; differing simply in the size and obtuseness of the apical portion. in | American Localities. Oe rer ee leeseee * leweens eeeeee eoneee © |eeeeee seeeee seneee feeeee 5 | 22 | 38 - This list (which is believed to be ver Modiola capax, Species. Station. Lathyrus ceratus, Wood ......... —— tuberculatus, Brod. ...... —— varicosus, Rve. ...eeececess Mitra muricata, Swains. ......... gratiosa, Rve............66.. —— gausapata, Rve. ............ Strigatella tristis, Swains. ...... —— effusa, Swains...cec.ccccceee Olivella Kaleontina, Ducl. Purpura patula, Lam. .......6004. —— columellaris, Zam.......... —— triangularis (= Carolensis, Rve.), Blainv. —— planospira, Lam. ......... Vitularia salebrosa, King. Monoceros grandis, Gray Engina carbonaria, Rve.......... Reeviana = pulchrum, Rve. —— pyrostoma, Sow............. —— maura, Sow. ...cc..ccceeeee —— crocostoma, Rve. Zonata, RvE. ........ecceeee Columbella hemastoma, Sow... varians, Sow. unicolor, Sow. ?Buccinum biliratum, Rve. pulchrum, Ave. [?=En- gina Reeviana. | Nassa nodifera, Pow. ............ angulifera, 4. Ad. —— nodocincta, 4. Ad. Fusus Dupetithouarsi, Kien. Anachis atramentaria, Sow...... nigricans, Sow. ..........4. ——— rugulosa, Sow. Strombina bicanalifera, Sow. ... — lanceolata, Sow............. Pisania cinis, Rue. .........e0008. Murex pumilus, Brod. ......... -—— nucleus, Brod. ....0...08. under stones. crevices of rocks. sandy mud, 6 fm. coral sand, 7 fm. 10 fm. 6-10 fms., sandy mud: also u.s. 1. w. sandy mud, 12 fm. shore. exposed rocks, 1. w. under stones, 1. w. exposed rocks. crey. rocks, l. w. under stones, 1. w. under stones. under stones. under stones, 1. w. under stones. coral sand, 6-10fm. under stones, ]. w. u. 8., 3-t.—Il. w. sandy mud, 10 fms. coral sand, 6-8 fin. under stones. under stones. coral sand, 8 fms. u. s. & rocks, 1. w. _ ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 361] Pacific Localities, Marquesas. ————— 11 species. y accurate in all respects except which is not included in the analysis) contains 20 land and freshwater shells, all of which are believed to be peculiar to the islands, except a Helix found at Tahiti, and a small Paludina, and Van Diemen’s Land (Darwin). Of the 90 marine Darwin, 47 were not known elsewhere; 25 inhabited the West coast of América, 8 being distinguishable as varieties; the remaining 18 having been found by Mr. Cuming in the Low Archipelago, and some of them also at the Philippines. Prof. Forbes, speaking of the Galapagos in the ‘Mem. Geol. Soc. Gr. Br.’ vol. i. p. 402, note, says, “We have distinct systems of reatures related to those of the nearest land by representation or affinity, and not by identity.” The latter word does not hold good of the sea shells; for there are already known 111 species at the Galapagos, of which 55, or nearly one half, are American shells; of these 25 inhabit the Gulf 192 _ have already been taken in Central America; 38 are found at Panama; but - only 11 from the parallel latitudes in South America. Only 4 bivalves are common to Tahiti, shells analysed by 362 ‘ REPORT—1856. quoted from the continent ; two [?] from the Gulf; one from Panama; the other (a distinct variety), from deep water, from Isle Plata. On glancing over the genera with their stations, it will be found that the coast shells common to the two are more numerous than those from deep water; and that the general aspect of the collection is essentially American*. The only genus not yet found on the coast is Stylifer, which may indeed afterwards receive species now placed in kindred genera, or be discovered on due search of Echinoderms. 83. Scarcely any generic forms are peculiar to the West Coast Fauna; except indeed Platyodon, Cryptodon and Mytilimeria, from California ; Letosolenus, from the Gulf; Callopoma and Teinostoma, from the Central Province, and Concholepas from Peru. But many attain here their greatest development ; especially Calyptreide, Fissurellide, Acmea, Uvanilla, Pomaular, Cecum, Chrysallida, Monoceros, Leucozonia, Cancellaria, Columbellide, Periploma, Parapholas, Saxidomus, Trigona, &e. The familiar genera of the East are often entirely absent ; especially the shell-bearing Cephalopods, Stomatellide, Dolium, Melo, Eburna, Ancillaria, Rosiellaria, Pterosceras, Phorus, Placuna, Malleus, Tridacnide, Glauconome, Meroé, Anatina, Aspergililum, &c. Others, abundant in the Indo-Pacific province, are here barely represented by a few species, or by minute or aberrant forms. Such are Marginella, Cithara, Liotia, Rimula, Cypricardia, Clementia, Circe, Mesodesma, Crassatella, Pythina and Scintilla; and the tribes of Casside, Harpide and Volutide. The genera Conus, Oliva, Cyprea, Terebra, &c., the staple commodities of the East, are here but poorly represented; nou large Cowry living on the coast except Cyprea exanthema, and uot a single species having been yet found in South America below the Bay of Guayaquil. (Hinds.) The almost entire absence of coral, so common in the West Indies and Polynesia, is to be remembered in connexion with the paucity of those tribes that usually feed on its banks. 84. The point, however, which may prove most interesting to the geologist and the geographical student, is whether there be any species common to the Pacific and the Atlantic shores of tropical America; and if so, what are they? It is easy for man to cross the narrow isthmus; have any Mollusks done the same? The determination of this question is a matter of great difficulty ; for while ordinary naturalists treat shells as of the same species, if there be no greater variation between them than is known to be allowable between individuals under the same name, it is the present custom with geographical conchologists to treat all similar shells as “ analogues” or “ representative species,” if they occur in unexpected places. In arranging the materials of this Report, those species have been treated as absolutely identical, where no difference obtained between the shells of different seas greater than was observed between individuals in one sea. Thus when the supposed peculiarities of the Pacific Purpura pansa, Gld., and Trochus picoides, Gld. are found in West Indian specimens, it is regarded as a mere deference to theory to keep them distinct. In other cases, where the shells of the two coasts have a marked difference of aspect, though not greater than may obtain in the same species, if a separation has been made, it is temporarily allowed, though it is more than probable that they will hereafter prove — identical. In other cases, the differences, though slight, appear permanent and specific ; and in a fourth group they are simply “interesting analogues,” but would at once be pronounced distinct, although from the same shore. * Dr. Gray states [Dr. Richardson’s Rep. Ichth. Chin. and Jap. 1846, p. 191, note] that the’ reptiles which inhabit the Galapages also belong to American groups. ON MOLLUSOA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 363 Now even Prof. Adams allowed that one shell was common, viz. Crepi- ‘dula unguiformis* ; and Dr. Gould himself inserts Venus cireinata and Crepidula aculeata in his Mexican War Lists. We therefore naturally argue, if one may be common, why not others also? Because we cannot see how they should find their way to other seas, is only an argument drawn _from our ignorance. Prof. Forbes, on glancing over the list of the Reigen Collection, allowed that there might be species in common; and in the ‘Quarterly Journal’ of the Geological Society will be found a paper by Mr. Henniker, in which the author gives geological reasons for the pro- bability of the intercommunication. As the level of the Atlantic is higher than the Pacific, any such communication must have poured the treasures of the Atlantic into the Pacific, and scarcely allowed of an exchange in the other direction. Such is found to be the case ; no species fairly belonging to the exclusive Pacific fauna being found in the West Indies. Is it possible _ that some such intercommunication may have been correlative with the _ glacial conditions of the European seas? Some of the supposed Caribbean shells in the Pacific appear to have migrated northwards; the Cyprea ex- anthema being poor and small at Panama, where it is called C. cervinetta, but large, fine and tolerably abundant at Mazatlan; the Strigilla carnaria also, not even noticed as an analogue by Prof. Adams, appears blanched but not uncommon at Mazatlan, and having crossed the “Cape Cod+” of the western shores, assumes its normal condition on the Californian coast. The ubiquitous Purpura patula, unknown at Panama, is extremely fine at the Gulf. Other species, however, seem to be dying out; as Lucina tigerrina and Mactra fragilis. eS KS ee eS st dlllllielid i ; A. Species regarded as identical between the Pacific and Atlantic. F Pacific. West Indies. Pacific. West Indies. 1, Gastrochzena truncata ... sp.—BristolMus. | 20. Orthalicus zebra ......... undata. 2. —— ovata .........- +++. Sp.—BristolMus. | 21. Hipponyx antiquatus....,. mitrula. 3. Petricola cognata ....... ». pholadiformis. | 22. Panamensis ......... subrufa. | 4. Tellina simulans ......... punicea. 23, Crepidula hystrix ...... feat 5. —— rufescens ............ operculata, —— echinus .........00. bac Pat > 6, == vicina........ sseeeeeese Dimaculata, 24, unguiformis ...... ... Goreensis. 7. Strigilla fucata ............ carnaria, 25. Crucibulum Cumingii ... sp. _ 8. ——pisiformis, teste Phil. pisiformis, 26. Ovulum gibbosum, teste gibbosum. 9. Mactra fragilis ..........45 fragilis. Cuming. 10. Dione circinata (? + al- circinata. 27. Cypraea cervinetta......... exanthema. ternata. 28. Torinia variegata ...... .-» Variegata. 11. Lucina tigerrina....... woes tigerrina. 29. Leiostraca ?distorta ...... ?distorta. 12. Diplodonta semiaspera... semiaspera, teste | 30. Olivella zonalis ..,......... sp. Phil. 31. Marginella cerulea prunum. 13. Modiola Braziliensis ...... Braziliensis. {not sapotilla]. 14. Lithophagus aristatus ... caudigerus. 32. Nitidella guttata ........ - cribraria. 15. —— cinnamomeus ...... cinnamomeus. {| 33. Purpura pansa ............ patula. 46. Arca labiata .............., labiata. 34. Anachis pygmea ......... costulata. 17. Isognomon flexuosum .., Chemnitzianum. | 35. Pisania ringens ......... »-. Sp-[Pernambuco, 18. Ostrea Virginica ......... Virginica. Br. Mus. Per- 19. Placunanomia foliacea ... foliacea. haps error.]. Tt will be seen that more than half the marine shells are bivalves. * It is generally said that this shell is only a variety of local types. Each local white shell may take the form wnguiformis; but there remains a distinct type, known by the form of _ the vertical whirls, which appears to be ubiquitous. It is not always recurved, and in its “natural state appears to be the Patella Goreensis of Gmel.—Vide Plate. f __ t This Cape separates the two faunas in Massachusetts: Cochlodesma, Moniacuta, Cumingia, Corbula, Tornatella, Vermetus, Columbelia, Cerithium, Pyrula, Ranella, do not pass north- _ wards; nor Panopea, Glycimeris, Terebratula, Puncturella, Trichotropis, Aporrhais, nor Admete ‘southwards, Of 197 marine species, 83 do not pass to the south, and:50 are not found on the _ north+-70 are found in Europe. (Gould, Rep. Inv. Mass.) : Js 364 REPORT—1856. B. Species which may prove to be identical. Pacific. West Indies. Pacific. West Indies. 1. Petricola robusta...... Choristodon typicum.| 18. Hipponyx Grayanus ...... ? Grayanus. 2. Solecurtus affinis ......... Caribbzeus. 19. Turritella tigrina ......... imbricata. 3. Corbula bicarinata......... Cubaniana. 20. Cerithium ? uncinatum ... uncinatum, 4, Tellina cognata .......... .. Similis. 21. Modulus catenulatus...... Carchedonicus. 5. Donax rostratus............ rugosa, Cuttingin | 22. disculus.........+++... — (pars) D’ Ord. Bristol Mus. | 23. Trivia suffusa_......... +» 2 suffusa. 6. Venus ? crenifera ......... crenifera. 24 ? pediculus ......... pediculus. 7. —— neglecta.......+.....+. cancellata. [? imported]. 8. Trigona radiata ............ mactroides, 25. Erato ? Maugere ......... Maugeree. 9. Gouldia Pacifica............ Crassatella Gua-|26. Lamellaria, sp. ............ SP. daloupensis. |27. Marginella minor ......... minima. 10. Chama frondosa (var. sp. 28 margaritula ......... ovuliformis. Mexicana). 29, Oliva inconspicua ......... ? oryza. 11. Felania serricata............ LucinaCandeana. | 30. —— Melchersi ............ sp. 12. Byssoarca mutabilis ...... Americana. 31. aTaneosa - ....... see» Feticulata. 13. —— gradata ..........00.0+ ?Domingensis. | 32, Olivella p. aureotincta ... petiolita. 14. FUSCA ...0seeeceeeeeeeee ? fusca, 33, Purpura biserialis ......... Floridana. 15. Ianthina decollata ......... prolongata. [=P. undata, C. B.Ad.] [not P. undata, 16. Crucibulum umbrella ... extinctorium. Lam.]. 17. Crepidula onyx .........++. sp. 34. Pisania gemmata ...... .+» tincta, Conr. The Gasteropods have now gained a large majority. C. Species really separated, but by slight differences. Pacific. West Indies. 1. Lyonsia picta.......s.secees plicata. 2. Capsa levigata ......... --- Braziliensis. 3. Mactra elegans ............ canaliculata. 4. Tapes histrionica ......... granulata. 5.Dione Chionza, var. ...... maculata, 6. —— lupinaria ....... ++... dione. 7. Cyclina subquadrata ...... sp. 8. Gouldia varians ...... Crassatella, sp. D’ Ord. 9. Cardium consors .....+... muricatum. 10. Lucina pectinata ........ . pecten. 11. Byssoarca solida ..... Pree) 1 12. Avicula sterna ............ Atlantica. 13. Planorbis tumens ......... affinis. 14, Physa aurantia ............ Maugere. 15. Clata cecccessccese sees) SP. 16. Bulla Adamsi............06 striata. 17. Ianthina striulata ......... fragilis. 18. Acmea fascicularis ...... Antillarum. 19. mitella ......++ sete SDs 20. Fissurella virescens, var.. Barbadensis. 21. Phasianella compta ...... sp. Pacific. West Indies. 22. Neritina picta............... Virginea. 23. Crepidula excavata ...... porcellana. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28, 29. 30. 31. Hipponyx serratus......... Sp. Turritella goniostoma ... meta. Cerithidea varicosa ..... . Lavalleana. Rissoina Woodwardi ...... Catesbyana Thomas). Alaba supralirata ......... tervaricosa. Trivia subrostrata ......... Sp» Ovulum variabile ......... subrostrata. Strombus gracilior........ . pugilis. 32. Terebra luctuosa .......+. cinerea. 33. Drillia incrassata ......... sp. (?alabastra, or 34, —— aterrima ........ s+ Sp. [?gibbosa). 35. Crysallida communis...... cancellatus. 36. Cerithiopsis assimilata ... terebella. 37. Lathyrus tuberculatus ... Knorrii. 38. Olivella tergina ..........«» conoidalis. 39. Purpura biserialis ...... +. deltoidea. 40. Pyrula patula............. -- melongena. 41. Murex recurvirostris ...... messorius. (St. The Gasteropods maintain their majority. D. Analogous but quite distinct species. Pacific. West Indies. 1, Tellidora Burneti ......... sp. 2. Mactra exoleta .......... .. Carinata. 3. Venus amathusia ...... ... dysera. 4, Anomalocardia subrugosa flexuosa. 5. Cardium elatum.,........... serratum. 6. —— ASPeYSUM .......ee00e bullatum. 7. Chiton sanguineus, Rve... sanguineus, Cutt. 8. Glyphis microtrema ...... sp. 9. Nerita Bernhardi ....... .. tessellata. 10. Petaloconchus macro- phragma 11. Litorina Philippii ......... ziczac. 12. Strombus Peruvianus ... gigas. 13. Conus purpurascens 111+, aChatinus. } varians. Pacific. West Indies. 14. Odostomia vallata......... Sp. 15. Parthenia armata ......... gemmulosa. 16. Chemnitziz, sp.........0++. SP. 17. Polynices uber ......... .». lactea. 18. Ficula decussata......... +». gracilis. 19. Mitra nucleola ............ granulosa. 20. Cassis abbreviata ......... inflata. 21. —— coarctata ............ testiculus. 22. Oniscia tuberculosa ...... oniscus. 23. Triton vestitus .,....++.... pilearis. 24, Nassa versicolor..........+. ambigua. 25. Anachis costellata ......... terpsichore. > 26. Murex CYOSUS,ss+rees0evee08 intermedius, &e, &e. ON MOLLUSCA OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. 365 It is probable that these lists will hereafter be greatly extended. The shells will be moved from one head to another, according to opinion and opportunities of judgment. Unfortunately, although the West Indian shells were among the first examined, they are to this day very little better known than by the Lamarckian conchologists. Most of the shells in collections are dead and worn, and the dredge has been but little used, especially in the great and doubtless prolific Gulf of Mexico*. At present our best sources of information are—(1.) The Sagra collection from Cuba (mostly poor shells), kept distinct in the British Museum. (2.) The St. Vincent collec- tions of the late Rev. L. Guilding, scattered in the general collections of the British Museum. (3.) The very fine Barbadoes collections of Dr. Cutting in the Bristol Museum. (4.) Prof. Adams’ sea-shells from Ja- maica, which have not yet been fully tabulated, though several are de- scribed in the ‘ Contributions to Conchology.’ Others also appear scattered in the ‘ Zeitschrift fiir Malacozoologie,’ and other works. The Pacific shells having been so little known to the earlier writters, when there are analogous species, it is fair to suppose that the West Indian forms are intended. This is another reason for their careful study. 85. But the analogies of the Mazatlan shells extend further than the Caribbean waters. Not merely some West Indian species, as Nitidella cri- braria, found also in the Pacific, have made their way to the east shores of the Atlantic; but several Mazatlan forms, not yet quoted from the West Indian islands, unexpectedly reappear on the Senegambian and Guinea coast, _ as though they loved western shores. Species 2?common to the West (Pacific) American shores and Africa. W. A.=West Africa. S.d.=South Africa. H. 4.=East Africa (Capt. Owen, B.M.). West America. Africa. 1. Saxicava arctica ....ccccccccsssccseseves ... arctica, 8. A. 2. Kellia suborbicularis ..............0008 +e. suborbicularis, W. A. 3. Isognomon Chemnitzianum ............ Chemnitzianum, W. A. 4. Lithophagus aristatus.........cc:cceeeeee caudigerus, W. A. 5. Ostrea iridescens.......csccsccsseseeeveees spathulata, W. A.t 6. Conchaphila ....cceevessseeseeeeeees conchaphila, W. A. 7. Placunanomia pernoides.........s..se000 pernoides, W. A. 8. Crepidula unguiformis .........s60seee0 Goreensis, W. A. 9. RCMLEALA Facsadessintecemadensebace + 0bse aculeata, S. A. 10. Hipponyx antiquatus .........ccesescees «. antiquatus, W. A. 11. Bankivia varians{ ..........ccccceeeeeeeee varians, 8. A. ‘12. Natica maroccana (Pritchardi) ......... maroccana, W. A.§ 13. Marginella cerulescens ........ eetes sted prunum, W. A. 14. Nitidella guttata ......ccccsecesesesenees ... eribraria, W. A. 15. Purpura pansa.....ssccseeseeees 48h AnkAIpOH patula, W. A. * If the “Central American difficulty” should ever draw our Transatlantic brethren, Messrs. Rich, Jewett and Green, to the Caribbzan seas, it is hoped that they will explore them well; an occupation surely more worthy of a philosopher than killing his brothers; and “ difficulty ” requiring solution quite as much as the ownership of the Mosquito territory. T It is believed that Petricola robusta was found in the African oysters; but this only sts on circumstantial evidence: v. B.M. Mazatlan Cat. p. 19. { The solitary young specimen of this characteristic species in the Reigen collection, was aken from the debris of a Spondylus, which is a sea (not shore) shell. ; § Having very carefully compared large numbers of the West American shells (Pritchardi, Forbes) with a fine series from Gambia, sent by Chief Justice Rankin to the Bristol Museum, Icannot but regard them as identical, both as to shell, operculum, and similarity of variations. The shells called unifasciata may or may not belong to this species: several unquestionably do. 366 nrac REPORT—1856. ho Aono we- The following species might be divided into groups answering to B, C, and D of the West Indian parallels. Lee iscinia Oumitipitteesess.cscte,cceseo ap sot e striata, W. A. 2. Pholadidea melanura ............000¢ «... Clausa, W. A. 3. Parapholas acuminata............ceeeee nee branchiata, W. A. 4. Tellina rufescens ....... Saath. tsps. as +» perna, Spl. (Madagascar.) 5. Iphigenia leevigata .......sccecsoseveseees sp,, W. A, (Bristol Mus.) Gul Prigana, Wats EGTA sis co0.0 44 sims oanssane tripla, W. A. i PAU Gare dese ss 8p. _ Thracia trapezoides, Conv. Pecten propatulus, Conr. [B.M. | Solemya ventricosa, Cony. Terebratula nitens, Conr. ; ‘Tellina arciata, Conr. Bulla petrosa, Cour. = emacerata, Conr. Crepidula prorupta, Cony. _ -— albaria, Cony. » Sp. _ —— nasuta, Conr. Turritella, sp. _ —— bitruncata, Cour. Cerithium mediale, Conr. _ 2Donaz pretexta,Conr.[?cast of Solemya.| | ? Rostellaria indurata, Conr. [resembles _ Venus bisecta, Conv. Strombus vittatus. | — angustifrons, Conr. Sigaretus scopulosus, Cony. [2 Naticina. | Z lamellifera, Cony. Natica saxea, Cour. _ — brevilineata, Conv. ? Dolium petrosum, Conr. Lueina acutilineata, Cony. 2? Buccinum devinctum, Cony. | Cardita subtenta, Conr. Fusus geniculus, Cony. _ Nucula divaricata, Conv. corpulentus, Cony. impressa, Cony. [ Leda. ] Nautilus angustatus, Conr. [?=N. _ Pectunculus patulus, Cony. zigzag. } _—— nitens, Cour. [resembles Limopsis.] _ The “ Dolium” is interesting from its close resemblance to the anomalous Argobuccinum nodosum= Cassidaria setosa, Hinds. _ Of the tertiary fossils of the United States, while many Atlantic species - occur, none have been noticed exclusively Pacific. There are some few which are found in both oceans ; and a Vermetus, among Mr. Nuttall’s Clai- borne fossils, closely approaches V. eburneus, while it differs from the West ‘Indian forms. These fragments of information are all that are yet accessible. 92. The object of this Report has been so to condense and arrange the ' existing materials that those who consult it may know what has been done, _ and may have the means of deciding on the value to be attached to different _ Sources of information. Thus they may be enabled to begin where the writer 4 “* The notes in [] are added by Mr. S. P, Woodward, who kindly furnished the above list, 368 REPORT—1856. leaves off, and not spend precious time in working out afresh what has already been ascertained*. He has stated his opinions with some freedom; because it was thought that an expression of the difficulties encountered in the prosecu- tion of the subject and of their causes, might (1) put other students on their guard, and (2) contribute somewhat towards their removal. They will be re- ceived simply as the judgments of a learner who came fresh to the subject, without previous acquaintance with books and naturalists. His object has been, not himself to build, but to clear away some of the encumbrances, lay part of the foundations, and collect a few of the materials, ready for the great architects of science to erect the beautiful edifice of harmonious knowledge. The first scientific explorer of these regions, the venerable Baron Humboldt, still lives to enjoy the earthly rest after his labours: but the early death of so many whose names have been quoted, of Eschscholtz, of Hinds, of Souleyet, of Reigen, of Adams, and of Forbes, urges us to “work while it is day”; that we may prepare for that state where ignorance shall have passed away, and where “ we shall know even as also we are known.” Warrington, Aug. 8th, 1856. dbstract of First Report on the Oyster Beds and Oysters of the British Shores. By T. C. Eyton, F.L.S., F.G.S. For convenience sake I shall divide this Report into three sections :—1st, A history of oysters and the laws relating to them. Zndly, An account of the different beds. $3rdly, The history of the oyster from its embryo state in the parent shell until it is seven years old; and, lastly, a summary of deductions from the reports I have received. The oyster fisheries of England are of great antiquity,—the luxurious Romans held the British oyster in high estimation. There have at different times been many Acts of Parliament passed for the protection of oyster-beds; the fisheries are at present, however, regulated by a Convention entered into between Her Majesty the Queen and the King of the French; and an Act passed to carry the same into effect (6 & 7 Vict. c. 79), which enacts that the fisheries shall open on the Ist of September and close on the 30th of April. The oyster-beds which I have visited or received reports from are the following :—Loch Ryan, the whole of the Welsh beds, Loch Fyne (a bed of no commercial value), Isle of Man beds, Jersey, Guernsey and Sark beds, Kentish and Essex beds. The oysters, from which the spawn I am about to mention was taken, were obtained from Loch Ryan, at the entrance to the Clyde, on the 10th of July, and were forwarded to me in a box packed in wet grass; they were thirty-two in number, of which only three proved to be in spawn: in these, from a rough calculation, which I believe to be much under the mark, the number of young was about 3,000,000. The first oyster I opened had the spawn exuded, so that it lay on one side between the folds of the mantle. The mass was of a purplish colour; and on examining it with a hand-glass, I could perceive some motion; but on placing some on a glass plate under a 4-inch power in the microscope, I could clearly perceive that what I had taken with the naked eye for ova were living animals varying slightly in shape. The animal was semi-transpareut, with two reddish elongated dots placed on each side behind the cilia, which were in constant * The Plates appended to this Report, at the recommendation of the Committee, are intended to illustrate some of the principal variations observed in individuals of the same species, especially when the forms have been described as different species, or represent the characters of different (so called) subgenera, ‘They are to be regarded as portraits, not photographs of the Mazatlan shells in the British Museum Collection. ON CLEAVAGE AND FOLIATION IN ROCKS. 369 and rapid motion. They were exceedingly tenacious of life, the cilia moving until the water was dryed upon the glass. Some that I placed in a little salt and water were alive the next day. The oysters on the table have been, through the kindness of Mr. Sweeting, fishmonger, Cheapside, sent to me, and are from one to four years old. It now, therefore, only remains to trace the life of the oyster and the changes it undergoes from the state I in which found it in the parent until it has formed its shell and attached itself to some substance, which I hope to be able to do next year in a continuation of this Report. From the reports I have received and my own observations, I think that the fence months might be advantageously altered on many beds, and that if such alteration was made, the markets might be supplied the greater portion of the year. The depth of water appears to be the chief cause of a difference in the time of spawning ; and it is exceedingly doubtful if on some deep beds they spawn at all; and they are probably supplied by the fry drifting from some neigh- bouring bed in shallower water. The commonly received opinion among the fishermen, that the oyster deposits its spawn in masses, is entirely erroneous. Oysters are best for the table out of shallow water, and at the entrance of a river if suitable ground is found, and feed quicker in such situations. The author then read a series of questions, which it was requested any person connected with oyster-beds would be kind enough to answer and forward to him:—1. Name of fishery? 2. Depth of water? 3. Computed size of beds? 4. At what age do oysters spawn? and do all oysters above that age spawn! §&. Does the time of spawning differ on different beds within your knowledge? 6. If such difference exist, is it caused by a variation in the depth of water, or any other reason? 7. What is the ground? 8. Do the oysters differ on different sorts of ground? 9. Add any other information. Report on Cleavage and Foliation in Rocks, and on the Theoretical Explanations of these Phenomena.—Part I. By Joun Puiuures, M.A., F.R.S., Reader in Geology in the University of Oxford. Or the numerous structures existing in rocks, two more predominant than the rest have long been referred to their appropriate causes—sedimentary deposition—crystalline aggregation. The ‘strata,’ formed by the first pro- cess, have all the varieties of mineral substance and magnitude of grain, and all the inequality of extent and bulk which we observe to occur in modern deposits from water; the granite and other quartzo-felspathic rocks offer a large range of crystalline aggregates, always analogous to, and sometimes undistinguishable from, the products of actual volcanoes. But in many, and especially in mountainous countries, examples occur of rocks which seem both crystalline in texture and stratified in structure, and others which are apparently formed by sediments, but are thoroughly fis- sured to a degree of tenuity, and with a regularity and continuity not observed in ordinary cases of stratification. The former case is exemplified in gneiss, the latter in clay-slate. Giving to the divisions of gneiss the name of ‘foliation,’ and to the fissures of slate the title of ‘cleavage,’ we may proceed to trace the observations and inferences by which some light has been thrown on these phenomena. We begin with cleavage. 2B 370 REPORT—1856. § 1. Cleavage distinct from Stratification. The drawing No. 1 is a transverse section of the strata in the Snow- ° oO oO = . — coal s g bs a ie ae Zr 26 °o n a a2oo nS 2S oe : c 23 @ ee 4 = is rey 5 < 3 ES ee o strata at 3 are subject to some un and indicated by arrows. 8, 1 The anticlina! marked by fine dot .; at 4, 80° S.E.; at 5, 80° W. See Gara Cc Cleavage is "9 1 2 ee ae In this section ccc are conglomeritic beds. to 85° N.W.; at 3, 80° to 85° S.E Menai. donian chain from the Menai through the great slate quarries of Mr.Pennant. It shows the argillaceous and arenaceous strata dipping to the right (S.E.) or left (N.W.), according to the anticlinal and synclinal axes of the district. The fine lines mark the cleavage which crosses the strata, the dotted lines above show the con- tinued ares of the strata, the deficiencies being attributed to enormous waste of the sur- face; dotted lines also mark the supposed extension of the cleavage surfaces. The section is an eatension of that given by Professor Sedg- wick*, the spectator being supposed to look northward. Professor Sedgwick has also given another section in the same linet, which shows a complete anticlinal at a. I did not observe this with certainty. It is remarkable that the investigation of ‘ cleavage’ is one almost entirely British, —till within a very few years almost entirely English; for neither Saussure, nor Wer- ner, nor any of their follow- ers, appear to have clearly distinguished between strati- fication and cleavage. Saus- sure{ indeed was too good an observer to pass without record the remarkable lami- nation of the argillaceous and calcareous rocks on the flanks of the great mountains which he so laboriously as- cended. He recognized two sets of fissures, but he attri- buted to stratification the often vertical traces of clea- vage, and was surprised to * Geol. Travis. 1835. + Geol. Proc. 1846. + Voyage dans les Alpes, §§ 1049, 1050 (1786). ON CLEAVAGE AND FOLIATION IN ROCKS. 371 find these laminz crossed by repeated fissures, nearly at right angles. The ‘repeated fissures’ are, however, often the traces of strata, and the nearly vertical lamin, so common in these parts of the mountains, are sometimes genuine cleavage*. In the gneissic axis of Mont Blane the nearly vertical divisions are ‘foliation.’ Even in our own day the true reading of the structure of the Alps is a difficult problem, and laminz of cleavage are there frequently described as layers of stratification. The following extracts from ‘ Travels in the Tarentaise in 1820, 1821,1822,’ by Robert Bakewell, published in 1823, show that this ingenious author had conceived views nearly approaching those of subsequent writers :— «On the eastern side of the valley (Thénes), about two miles from the town of Thénes, there is a rock which presents an appearance of double stratification, not uncommon in the calcareous mountains of the Alps, and which has frequently induced Saussure to suppose that the vertical strata were placed in junction with other strata nearly horizontal; an error into which he has been led by mistaking very distinct vertical cleavages for stra- tification. On approaching that rock I had little doubt that the strata were vertical, but when I came in front of it I perceived the true strata-seams forming curves, which were intersected at one end by a vertical cleavage. It sometimes happens that the strata-seams are entirely concealed in the perpendicular escarpment of rock by a calcareous incrustation deposited over the face of the rock, and in such instances the cleavages often project and resemble strata so much that it requires great care to avoid error in tracing the true line of dip in the stratification. This probable cause of error is of frequent. occurrence in the Alps.”—Vol. i. p. 67. In the valley of the Arve—*“ The cleavages on a large scale are often as regular as the strata themselves, and can be scarcely distinguished from them ; and as these cleavages intersect the strata nearly at right angles, this has also led to many erroneous conclusions respecting the stratification of the calcareous mountains of this part of Savoy.”—Vol. i. p. 337. From the Appendix, vol. ii. p. 423 :—“ There are other situations where the calcareous mountains of the Alps present to the hasty observer an ap- pearance of the most irregular and contorted stratification imaginable, which _ is merely an optical illusion produced by a variety of cleavages in the moun- tain limestone ; some being at right angles to the line of dip, and cthers to the line of bearing. There is likewise another cleavage in some of these mountains which is curved, and is produced by a tendency to a globular structure in the mass of the mountain. [A mountain in the valley of -Lauterbrun, referred to as an illustration.] Near the end of the mountain the true strata-seams are seen, and are nearly horizontal, while farther up the valley several curved perpendicular cleavages present the appearance of thick beds of strata very much bent. In this instance the overlapping of the edges of the strata and the direction of the natural cleavages have nearly concealed the true form of the stratification. Such instances as this are of frequent occurrence in the Alps, and have been the source of many erroneous conclusions, for they have hitherto been but imperfectly understood. This tendency to a globular structure en masse I observed very frequently in the Bernese Oberland. It is altogether independent of stratification, though it has often been mistaken for it; but it has not hitherto been noticed, that I know of, by any geologist that has visited the Alps. The limestone in which observed the curved cleavage most distinctly is dark coloured, hard and * See Renevier, Bull. de la Soc. Vaudoise, 4 July, 1855; Forbes, Travels in the Alps; Sharpe, Geol. Proceedings, 1854. 232 372 REPORT—1856. brittle; and it is intermixed with schist. This limestone seems to pass by gradation into flinty slate.” In his ‘Introduction to Geology’ (published 1813) the same author ex- presses a positive opinion. Speaking of slate, he observes,—‘ This rock is always represented as stratified; but in this respect it resembles gneiss and mica-slate, and the slaty and tabular structure are, I conceive, the effect of crystallization, depending on the nature of its constituent parts.” —P. &6. The earliest notice of a real and firm di- stinction between cleavage and stratification, derived from English examples, which I have met with, is in Otley’s ‘ Concise Description of the English Lakes*.’ The modest and intelligent author, speaking of the middle division of the slaty rocks, notices their pre- valent though obscure stratification dipping to the south-east, speaks of the beds of slate with frequently vertical cleavage, and adds, “ but it is found in various degrees of inclina- tion, both with respect to the horizon and planes of stratification.” In 1821 I made the acquaintance of this able author, verified his remarks on slaty cleavage, and in the same year sketched some of the more curious and special phznomena in the Lake district, which caught the attention of W. Smith, then engaged on his geologicalmap —, ¥ 5” are bands of stratifica- of that country+. In the mind of that great tion, displaced by a small fault f, observer cleavage was separated from strati- across which, and across the stra- fication, and regarded as a kind of erystalliza- tification, two small spar veins tion, running in particular beds. run, quite straight, “ihe cornet : - li dges, more than usuall Dr. MacCulloch was too practised in obser- pe als Ged syne of 7 vations among primary rocks not to have ob- _ scaly structure, lying obliquely to served the peculiarites of slate, and we find the plane of cleavage.” (Is this him distinguishing cleavage from stratification, % ¢ase of secondary cleavage ?) and referring it to coneretionary actiont. § 2. Cleavage continuous through large ranges of country. Notwithstanding these and probably many other partial views which recognized some difference between cleavage and stratification, it was re- served for Professor Sedgwick, in the year 1835§, to define in a satisfactory manner the essential character of slaty cleavage, and to show its exact place in the series of changes by which soft argillaceous deposits have been stra- tified and solidified, cleft and jointed. Instructed by the repeated examina- tions of the schistose rocks of Westmoreland and Wales (begun in 1822), how to discover the almost evanescent traces of bedding, which in some cases are all that metamorphic action has left. and recognizing in these * Keswick, 1823. There was an earlier publication in the Kirkby Lonsdale Magazine, 1820. t+ See Memoir of W. Smith, p. 99. t Journal of the Roy. Inst. 1825. System of Geology, 1831, i. 139; ii. 186. § Geol. Trans. 2nd series, vol. ii. s 4 ON CLEAVAGE AND FOLIATION IN ROCKS. 373 tracts the enormous and repeated undulations of the strata,—he found these seemingly irregular structures crossed and cut through by a series of planes characterized by almost unvarying symmetry—parallel and con- tinuons through the heart of Snowdonia and the steeps of the Westmore- land Alps,—and so regular as to appear like the results of enormous crystallization. ; These results—confirmed by universal research among the mountainous tracts of the old and new world—by Studer and Forbes in the Alps, by Murchison in Siluria, Darwin in the Andes, and Rogers in the Appalachians*, —leave no doubt that cleavage is a peculiar structure impressed on certain rocks and in certain regions, by the operation of some very extensive cause Operating after the stratified rocks had undergone great displacement. For this fundamental generalization we are, I believe, entirely indebted to Sedgwick. § 3. Cleavage in continuous parallel planes across bent and contorted Strata. Of this remarkable fact, and of its extensive bearing on the theory of cleavage, Professor Sedgwick’s memoir gives the earliest notice, confirmed by abundant examples in Wales:—“ A rugged country, more than thirty miles in length and eight or ten in breadth, stretching from the gorge of the Wye above Rhaiadr to the upper gorges of the Elan and the Towy, exhibits on a magnificent scale, thousandsof examples of much contorted strata, crossed by parallel cleavage planes. Of the true bedding in these cases there is not a shadow of a doubt. Many parts are of a coarse mechanical texture; but subordinate to these are fine chloritic slate. But the coarser beds and the finer, the twisted and the straight, have all been subjected to one change. Whatever be the contortions of the rocks, the planes of cleavage pass on, generally Fig. 3. without deviation, running. in parallel lines from one end to the other, and in- clining at a great angle to a point only a few degrees west of magnetic northt.” The Diagram No. 3 shows the directions w E here assigned. Those which follow (4, 5) are vertical sections copied from Sedg- wick, to show the parallelism of cleavage planes across strata bent anticlinally (4) and contorted (5). Fig. 4. River Wye above Rhaiadr. Cleavage dips to N.W., across anticlinal. * Proceedings of American Naturalists and Geologists, 1845. t+ Geol. Trans. 2nd series, vol. ii. p. 477. 374 REPORT—1856. Pigs oe On the River Towey. ¥ Cleavage dips N.W. by north, and is parallel across many flexures. In Diagram 6, a case of local exception to the rule is given by Sedgwick. There the cleavage planes preserve their strike, but change the direction and amount of their inclination, in such a way as to pass vertically through the anticlinal axis, and to be inclined toward this axis on each side of it. There is no cleavage observable in the lower or more central parts of the bent mass of rocks. Fig. 6. Craig Gibbon. On road from Llangollen to Ruthin. Cleavage convergent to an aunticlinal dipping N.N.E. on one side, and 8.S.W. on the other, but vertical in the axis of the strata. § 4. Cleavage symmetrically related to axes of movement of the Strata. In a great number of examples in Wales, Westmoreland and Yorkshire, where the cleavage is perfect and the strata are distinct, it is found that the edges of the lamin of cleavage show themselves very plainly in the surfaces of stratification, and these edges are often nearly horizontal. To use the expression of Sedgwick, who first declared the fact, “ where the cleavage is well developed in a thick mass of slate rock, the strike of the cleavage is nearly coincident with the strike of the beds*.” This is most frequently ob- served where the strike of the strata is most persistent; or in other words, where the anticlinal and synclinal axes of movement are most simple, con- tinuous, and uniform in direction. But where the axes of movement are complicated by small folds and twists, the local coincidence of the strike of cleavage and the strike of stra- tification frequently fails; the cleavage maintains, or tends to maintain, one uniform direction, and thus crosses the folds of the strata under various circumstances, more or less suggestive of an influence more general than that which determined the folds. If the expression above quoted from Prof. Sedgwick be well considered, and taken in connexion with the exceptions which he mentions, it will appear that in his mind the direction of cleavage in a large district was coincident, * Geol. Trans. 2nd series, vol; vi. p. sli The word ‘strike’? was, I believe, first em- ployed in this sense by Sedgwick. P ‘ ON CLEAVAGE AND FOLIATION IN ROCKS. 375 ' or nearly so, with éhe main or mean direction of the strike of the beds, though it is not actually so stated in the paper. In 1843 I presented as the result of a special study of the geographical relation in question, among the slaty rocks of Wales, the following explicit expression—“ The cleavage planes of the slate rocks of Wales are always parallel to the main direction of the great anticlinal axes, but are not affected by the small undulations and contortions of those lines *,” which may be regarded as confirming the views of Sedgwick. Prof. Jukes finds the same result in Newfoundland+. Mr. Darwin has an analogous expression for South America:—“ The clea- vage laminz range over wide areas with remarkable uniformity, being parallel in strike to the main axes of elevation, and generally to the outlines of the coast}.” And since 1837, Professors H. D. Rogers and W. B. Rogers have observed and recorded, in Virginia, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey, “ the close parallelism of the cleavage planes of a given district with each other, and with the main axis of elevation of the district§.” And lastly, in 1849, Mr. D. Sharpe, in reviewing these statements, adds, as from his own conviction, that “the direction of the strike of the cleavage is parallel to the main direction of the axes of elevation, and has no necessary connexion with the strike of ' the beds||.”. This is somewhat enigmatical, for it is by the “strike of the beds” that we determined the axes of elevation and depression: Mr. Sharpe had perhaps misunderstood Professor Sedgwick’s use of the word strike, and probably meant to say that the cleavage observed at any one place was not necessarily dependent on the strike of the beds at that place. Professor Harkness has found remarkable agreements between the strike of cleavage and the axes of movements in the S.W. of Ireland. According to these authors, then, though cleavage is really or nearly independent at every point of the previously fixed position of the strata there, crosses them with little variation, whether they be curved or plane, and preserves or nearly preserves its own dip or its own verticality, in whatever direction and in whatever degree they are inclined ; cleavage and stratification have, never- : theless, one real geographical relation, an approximate parallelism of strike, _ dependent on the axes of movement of the rocks. To this conclusion, how- ever, there are many exceptions; one of the most remarkable exceptions known to me is found in North Devon, where the general strike of the beds is nearly east and west; but the cleavage strike is nearly E.N.E. and W.S.W., by the observations of Sedgwick, Sharpe and myself. In Charnwood Forest I find the average strike of the strata, exactly measured, to form an angle of 19° 12! with the average strike of the cleavage. —_a- tite 45 § 5. Relation of Cleavage Planes to the Inclination of the Strata. Almost every observer in mountainous regions who has once perceived the symmetrical relation of the strike of cleavage to the great axes of movement of the masses, seeks for some corresponding symmetry between the dip of the strata and the inclination of the cleavage. But unless the investigation be carried across a whole district, so as to furnish comparisons on both sides of all the anticlinals and synclinals, the result cannot be much relied on. Mr. Darwin, who has in this respect the advantage of great range of observation, having observed the persisteuce of the sérike of cleavage, and * Reports of the British Association, 1843, p. 61. + Geological Survey of Newfoundland, p. 130. }{ Geological Observations in South America, p. 162. § Ann. Reports on the Surveys of these States, 1837-40. || Proceedings of Geol. Soc. 1846. § Reports of British Association, 1855, p. 82. 376 REPORT—1856. the frequent change of their dip both in angular value and direction, sought for some order in these changes. He observed that frequently, in Tierra del Fuego and in other countries in South America, cleavage planes were inclined in opposite directions on opposite sides of an anticlinal, so as to dip inwards*. ‘The Alps, given as an example of this fan-like arrangement of strata by Studer+, and the corresponding appearance previously recorded by von Buch in Norway, are mentioned by Darwin as possibly related to this phenomenon of cleavage. Professor H. Rogers submitted to the Ame- rican Association for the Advancement of Science, a further statement, that “the cleavage dip is parallel to the average dip of the anticlinal and synclinal axis planes, or those bisecting the flexuresy.” The Alps in this view are supposed to have on their flanks many folds of strata, whose “axis planes” dip inwards; and parallel to these “axis planes” the cleavage structure is developed. The axis planes are more highly inclined at greater distances from the central summit ridge. Fig. 7. Hypothetical Sketch Section of Alps. For the most detailed view yet presented on this subject we are indebted to Mr. D. Sharpe, now unhappily lost to science. According to Mr. Sharpe, if we trace geographically any particular plane of cleavage by following its strike 5, 10, 20 or more miles, we shall find it preserve, within narrow limits, the same angle of dip, and in the same direction. On proceeding a few miles to the right or left, and selecting a second plane of cleavage, it is probable that this will not dip at the same angle, possibly not in the same direction ; but this angle and this direction of dip are equally persistent along the line of strike to which they belong. When by repeated trials of this kind the struc- ture of a large tract of country is ascertained, it is found that along certain lines of strike some miles apart, the cleavage is vertical, or nearly so; that near these lines the cleavage surfaces are steeply inclined toward them, but far from them greatly inclined. Thus something like auticlinal and synclinal axes appear, and “systems of cleavage” are traced through countries which also manifest “systems of movement.” Thus Mr. Sharpe states, that in North Wales a line of vertical cleavage runs N.E. and S.W. along the slate beds which lie on the western flank of the Snowdon chain; another such line runs through the great slate quarries between Dinas Mowddy and Maliwyd. These lines are about 35 miles apart. Between them the cleavage is inclined,—near the north-western line the dips are north-westward,—near the south-eastern line they aresouth-eastward,—the angle of inclination being least towards the middle part of the area included * Geological Observations in South America, p. 164. + Edinb. New Phil. Journal, vol. xxxiii. p. 144. t Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb. 1856, p. 447. 4 ON CLEAVAGE AND FOLIATION IN ROCKS. ~ 377 between the lines*. The general result of that inquiry, as regards this tract Fig. 8. Fig. 9. Bala. WN T \\ Ws hh Wu \ Rs ore c AS s, Chee ahd Ss, cence, my, anne, “0 ey, a“ . Rhaiadr Cwm. Section of strata in North Wales, on a line from N.N.W. to S.8.E., according to Sharpe. KRY v x rah Fig. 10. Section of cleavage on the same line of country, according to Sharpe: at @ and 6 cleavage vertical. Snowdonia. Rhaiadr Cwm, cai Tew Section of strata and cleavage on line from Snowdon to Bala. Nn NR EAS ir tH pace only, exchanged ) the usual cleavage dip to N.W. is, for a short s At a (Beddgelert age dips near Bala, as far as I observed seldom exceeded 80°. The cleay. for vertical inclinations. of country, may be understood by refer- ence to the drawings marked 8, 9. In his description of these sections, Mr. Sharpe calls attention to the fact, that “in this wide area we have only one axis of the cleavage, but there are several anticlinal and synclinal axes of the stratification ; these (with the exception of the central one at Rhaiadr Cwm) have no effect on the clea- vage, which follows its own direction indiffer- ently through beds dipping in opposite di- rections. Still there is so much relation be- tween the direction of the cleavage planes and the position of the beds, that we might infer from this section alone that the cause which produced the cleavage of the rocks had helped to deter- mine the elevation of the beds.” This infer- ence is not only ob- scure, but seems op- posed to those already established, which as- sign priority of date to the movements of the strata,and more exten- sive symmetry to clea- vage than to inclina- tion of beds. The region thus sketched by Mr. Sharpe was previously traversed by myself in 1836 and 1843 with a view tc measured re- * Sharpe, 1846; “On Slaty Cleavage,” Proc. of Geol. Soc. p. 90, &c. 378 REPORT—1856. sults, but Idid not feel authorized by my observations to draw the same con- clusions. The section, as it appeared to me, is given in Diagram No. 10. We are indebted to the same observer for observations of the same gene- ral character in the Lake ‘ district of England. Fig. 12. The Diagrams 11 and ana ee] 12 represent sections from RES north to south, through Skiddaw and the region of the Borrowdale Fells, as far as Watendlath, drawn on the same plan as Diagrams 8 and 9. In these sections the axes of cleavage and stratifica- tion are identical in place and in strike; the strata and cleavage agree in the de- rection of their dip; they agree even in the angle of dip on the south side of the axis of elevation (45°), but from this point southward the dip of the beds grows less and less till we reach the synclival, where it is 25°, while the dip of the cleavage grows greater and greater till at the synclinal it is vertical. The strike of the beds varies from N. 15° E. to N. 30° E. That of the cleavage is generally N. 60° E., but varies from N. 45° E. to N. 75° E. I have lately followed this section with attention in Borrowdale, Watendlath and Skiddaw. It appears to correspond in the south- ern part with the cleavage dips of the region, but the dips of the strata are more various in direction and angle than the section shows. The cleavage dips are vertical about Watend- lath, and in the parallel valley about Rosthwaite on lines N. 67° E. (E.N.E.) In descending Borrowdal as far as Bowderstone, this direction of cleavage strike is frequently observable, with a dip to the southward growing less and less (82°-72°), while the dip of the strata is also southward (45°-24°). Still Borrowdale, Watendlath. g. Green slate. t. Trap. Keswick. Section of Strata. Section of Cleavage. s. Skiddaw slate. Skidadw. a. Mountain limestone. ON CLEAVAGE AND FOLIATION IN ROCKS. 379 further northward, at a great quarry the cleavage dip is southward 52°, the dip of the beds irregular, but northerly about 60°; and still farther the Fig. 13. gee cleavage dip is southerly 50°, 40°, edt 38°,—which last observation was made at Grange. , t 3 4 These results are all on the aye y north side of the line of vertical E f g cleavage at Watendlath, and in the middle slate series. In the = cal, the cleavage is nearly coin- > cident with the strata. I have seen no horizontal cleavage in the Lake district *. In the still more interesting sections on this page (Diagrams 13 and 14), Mr. Sharpe repre- sents the bedding and the clea- vage in a line of country crossing the strikes of both, from Helvel- lyn to Bowness. In Diagram 13 the strata are seen to be bent an- ticlinally and synclinally in Hel- vellyn,—raised in a broad arch north of Grasmere, and from ‘© thence subject only to smaller folds, dipping generally south- south-eastward. In Diagram 14, the cleavage dips are shown for the same region, these being per- * Prof. Sedgwick has obliged me by a note confirming this statement in re- B gard to the Lake district, but he has observed horizontal cleavage in Corn- wall and Wales, and Mr. Sharpe records it in Devonshire. . 8 * Watendlath Valley and in the . & fells between it and Borrowdale, . % —"* =~ the phenomena are much less | % g regular. In the Skiddaw slate Be Fe; which appear near Grange, the 3 8 cleavage surfaces are sometimes ae twisted so as to he partly vertical, ar and partly diping south, with an 8 Irregular strike N. 25° E., which 3 differs from the strike of Wat- 3 3 endlath, Bowderstone, andGrange e~ above 40°. When the beds and : & ~ the cleavage dip in opposite di- | rections, the angle included be- : 3 tee | ase tween the planes is in several a 3 . cases about 68°; when the di aia SN ae . . P : SEQ = is in the same direction, the clea- : =. vage at the highest angle, the in- Bors = cluded angle is often about 32°. ns, When the beds are nearly verti- saa = & ° S a _ 3 n Section of the Cleavage (Sharpe). Grasmere, 3092 80 30° 30° 75 80 85 90 85 80 Helvellyn. 75° 0 a 380 REPORT—1856. pendicular on five lines, @, b, e, d,e; on each side of these lines highly in- Fig. 15. clined, at points farther removed less so; the least (recorded) inclination being 65° to the N.N.W. (south of ‘Troutbeck), and 75° to the S.S.E. (north part of Helvel- lyn). Thus the extreme difference of dip in the cleavage of the slates of this tract is 40°; the most prevalent dip of cleavage is to the N.N.W., about 80°. The lines whose cleavage is vertical are mostly coincident with faults, or remark- able folds of the strata. The dip of the strata is most regular and continuous be- tween Grasmere and Troutbeck,—on an average about 33° to the S.S.E.: in the same tract the dip of the cleavage on an average is 80° to the N.N.W. The angles included between the planes of cleavage and those of stratification=on an average 67°. I have examined this tract of country many times, and have recorded carefully the strikes and dips of bedding and clea- vage in a great number of cases. The facts of my survey agree in several fea- tures with Mr. Sharpe’s data, but they conduct to somewhat different inferences. There are not so much dines or axes as several parallel bands in which the clea- vage is vertical or deviates 5° to 10° on either side, and these bands are rather suddenly succeeded by others in which the cleavage dips with considerable stea- diness about 70°. Thus a band of verti- cal and highly inclined cleavage passes through Helvellyn; a band of cleavage inclined 50° to 70° northwardly runs through Grasmere and Rydal; a band of vertical and highly inclined cleavage passes through the tract between Am- bleside and Low Wood Inn, and indeed extends as far south as a little north of Bowness ; then succeeds another band of cleavage inclined 79° to N.N.W.; and this is followed by nearly vertical bands in the lower part of Windermere. North of the Helvellyn band comes in the band of Borrowdale, inclined southwardly 72°, 52°, 40°. By combining these observations as in Diagram No. 15, the succession of these bands appears distinctly ; and it is evi- dent that the cleavage dips run into systems of greater and less inclination, Newby Bridgee 7 7 /--~/ ° fae LEDs Bowness, 77 Watendlath. _ aaa ee, Cleavage 72°-+. Strata inclined. inclined Strata undulated. Cleavage nearly vertical. Strata inclined Cleavage inclined 50° to 72°. (Slate quarries.) Strata undulated. Cleavage nearly vertical. (Porphyritic range ) Strata inclined. Cleavage inelined 40° to 72°. (Slate quarries.) ON CLEAVAGE AND FOLIATION IN ROCKS. 381 which induced Mr. Sharpe to employ the terms “ anticlinal and synclinal,” and to represent the lines of cleavage as parts of elliptical curves*, to which however, they really bear but slight resemblance. It is further evident, that when the dips of the strata are most uniform in direction, the cleavage also mostly dips in one direction ; and that where the strata are subject to much contortion and frequent changes of dip, the cleavage is either vertical, or deviates only a few degrees (5° to 10°) on either side of the vertical. For the most part the cleavage planes are steeper than the surfaces of the strata. The most prevalent direction of the cleavage strike in Westmoreland is E.N.E., varying however to E. and N.E. This corresponds nearly with the strike of the beds. In the country east of Kendal, about Hougill Fells, it is nearly E. and W. (N.80° E., N. 85° E.). In the same vicinity the beds strike E.N.E. and N. 85° E., or on the whole a little more to the northward. Pro- ceeding to the S.E., we find cleavage well-developed in the clearly bedded _ rocks of Ribblesdale, subjacent to the mountain limestone, which shows no sign of cleavage. The beds of slate are marked by graptolites and shells; the cleavage is always traceable. The beds are undulated on axes directed between 15° north of west, and 3° north of west. (In a certain limited roll, the strikes vary 37° (from 22° north of west to 15° south of west). The cleavage strike is nearly parallel, in a general sense, to the strike of the beds; it varies only 10° (from 16° north of west to 6° north of west).) There is one principal synclinal roll of the strata (6), with dips on the north side (a) of 46° to S.S.W.; on the south side (c) 60°, 73°, 80° to N.N.E.; then for a narrow space the beds are vertical (d); after which is a broad band of dips (e) 76°, 80°, 76°, &c. to N.N.E. | S. Fig. 16. tt : : \\ \ BE f 6 @ ' s. SPR OESTEED: At a. Strata dip 46° S.S.W. Cleavage dip 66°-60° S.S.W. &. ,, synclinal ,, 3 » @2° 8.S.W. ec. ,, dip N.N.E. fr Fr S.S.W. d. ,, vertical ,, »» none or dip 80° S.S.W. e. 4, dip 76°N.N.E. » vertical. The cleavage in all this tract dips to the S.S.W., at angles which upon the * Geol. Proceedings, 1846. 382 REPORT—1856. whole grow greater and greater toward the southern end ; so that beginning in the northern part at 60° and 66°, they augment in the synclinal roll to 72°, south of it to 80°, and at length appear vertical, near the line of the North Craven Fault, which ranges E.S.E., nearly parallel to the strike of the beds and the cleavage. In Diagrams 16 and 17 these remarkable facts are ex- pressed in a section from N. to S. in Ribblesdale, which may be compared with Diagrams No. 4, 5, 6. ! As already observed, the rocks which form the needles and sharp crests on the flanks of Mont Blane, appeared to Studer and other geologists to be com- posed of laminz which, viewed on a great scale, dip inward on each side of the great chain, so as to produce in the section a fan-shaped structure; and this has the more caught attention because the lowest in the scale of lamina- tion contain organic remains and appear to be covered by crystalline schists, —the gneissic and granitic series of Mont Blane. It appears to Mr. Sharpe that these fan-shaped laminz are due to cleavage; that an anticlinal axis of foliation shows itself between two lines of vertical foliation in Mont Blane, and runs through the whole chain; and that there is really no superposition of gneiss above fossiliferous strata. He traces across the region of the Swiss Alps, nine of these parallel axes and ten vertical bands of cleavage and folia- tion. The following is Mr. Sharpe’s section* of the granitic or gneissic mass (protogine) of Mont Blane, and the strata adjoining which appear to dip into or under the gneissic rocks. 3 bo Fig. 18, 3 8 Mont Blanc. > Col du : 4 = SS? SS Ss Pon TS SoS SSS Ss SS? RS SS = WY, ay Val Ferret Chamoun, i < et] t/ E> Pe A a pkg AMA TEAL HA Leis SEZ AN AR a S oe a a em ee pena AT: Sowers = cc 1 W i WAS\ SSAA tL v D v E 4th Awis.\ 5th Avis The Section No. 19 exhibits the same systems of cleavage and foliation, the same axes, and the same verticals; the strata on the flanks of the Mont Blane are secn reposing against the gneiss, not dipping into or under it. The gneiss is not supposed to be stratified, but foliated; the foliation being in planes parallel to, and even continuous with, those of cleavage. Fig. 19. From the Col de Balme to the Col Ferret. Aiguille Mont de Tour. ols F ¥v c Prof. Forbes and Prof. Rogers do not admit the statements and conclu- sions of Mr. Sharpe in regard to the Mont Blane range. They are indeed much different from the usual ideas of geologists, and well deserve a careful revision and verification before being implicitly adopted in the theory of * Geol. Proceedings, Nov. 1854. a - = sh A Killikrankie, Grampians. ‘ Coryaraick, Fig. 20. s=oaa Palen eae eee ees Thee ~ S SS ~ = = RSS a = ey ON CLEAVAGE AND FOLIATION IN ROCKS. 12 miles diam. 26 miles diam. 11 miles diam. 20 miles diam. 383 cleavage and foliation. It can, however, scarcely be doubted that in this district bands of nearly vertical cleavage alternate with bands of cleavage inclined 40°, 50°, 60°, 70°. The reference of these dips to certain anticlinal and synclinal* axes is the part of Mr. Sharpe’s view which specially requires the atten- tion of observers both in Scotland and in Switzerland. Mr. Sharpe obtained results of the same general character in the Highlands, but with the vertical bands (synclinal axes) much further apart than in the Alps, and the anticlinal arches very much flat- tened, so as to be represented by two ellipsest (Diagram 20). By Lyell and most writers the foliation here re- ferred to axes, is regarded as the stratification, or traces of the stratification, of the metamorphic rocks of gneiss and mica-schist. The strike of the verti- cal planes over Scotland seems to radiate from Do- negal, and is in general included between N, 25° E., and N. 50° E.; but in the northern part of the Isle of Lewis and the western parts of Ross and Suther- land it is about N.W., or nearly perpendicular to the usual course. § 6. Cleavage varies in Strata of unlike quality. In a series of strata subjected to cleavage forces, the result varies according to the nature of the strata; perfect slaty structure being confined to argillaceous, and mostly to thick-bedded argillaceous devosits. (a.) In a given section some of the strata are completely traversed by cleavage, others not at all. In this Diagram, repre- senting a _ section at Aberystwyth, 1836, the beds s, s' are softer and more argillaceous; h is harder and more arenace- ous. The cleavage crosses s and s', but is inter- rupted in A. Across h, however, there are gene- rally found a considerable number of “joints,” which are always more nearl perpendicular to the plane of the beds than the clea- vage planes: are. These joints have in some cases the same strike as the cleavage. Fig. 21. * Mr. Sharpe does not mark these in his section ; they in fact coincide with his vertical] dips. T Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., 1852, p. 445. 384 REPORT—1856. Sedgwick seems to refer to such a case as one of imperfect cleavage, marked by parallel planes at definite distances, which it might be difficult to class with joints or cleavages. (4.) In other examples all the strata are traversed by cleavage, but not all at the same angles of inclination. In this Diagram, taken by the author Fig. 22. from Leck Beck near Kirkby Lonsdale, 1823*, the letters indicate, as before, soft and hard beds: the inclination of the cleavage planes varies in these beds in such a way, that in the harder bed they deviate more from planes of stratification than in the softer beds. Such cases were observed by the au- thor in Wales, 1836; North Devon, 1839; Cove of Cork, 1843; by Sharpe in Lang- dale, 1849; by Townsend at Cork, 1854; by Harkness in the S.W. of Ireland, 1855. (e.) Not unfrequently, when beds al- ternate whose mineral aggregation is not uniform, the cleavage surfaces are curved in the remarkable manner shown in Dia- gram 23. In this Diagram (23) the cleavage edges seen in the principal section are bent, so that at the surfaces of each bed they tend to coincide with the stratification, but in the middle of each bed they form a considerable angle with the stratification. The first example I ever saw of this was at Sallenche, in the Liassic slate, at the base of Mont Blane, in 1830. I afterward observed it at Dolbadarn, in North Wales, in Westmoreland, and Devonshire. Mr. Sharpe has since confirmed this state-- ment. It is sometimes possible to trace near the bounding surfaces of the beds lamine (/) of deposition, and sometimes the original distinction of beds is only marked by such laminz. (d.) Cleavage surfaces are usually dis- turbed when traversing or passing near to masses of unequal hardness. When, as in Diagram 24, beds of slate enclose nodules of greater hardness,—as limestone or ‘ calliard,’ or ironstone,—the cleavage, which is perfect and continuous in the mass of slate, becomes irregular and interrupted so as to resemble a series of cracks in the nodules ; these cracks follow the law indicated in Diagram 2], and tra- verse the nodules in directions more nearly * Geol. Trans. 1828. ON CLEAVAGE AND FOLIATION IN ROCKS. 385 perpendicular to the planes of the stratification than the cleavage planes are. Carbonate of lime, or quartz, may often be found filling these cracks ; sul- phuret of iron also occurs in them. The Fj slaty laminze are somewhat twisted about ig. 25. the nodules. Mr. Sorby has given us an example | {3 | (Diagram 25) of the deviation of cleavage planes in passing through a thin bed of | uu indurated gritstone, lying in fine-grained | | slate near Ilfracombe. The strata being || subject to much’ pressure, the thin grit- | stone layer is bent in parallel folds, and is of greatest thickness in the vertices of the | folds. In this remarkable case, which is (u-¥ on a small scale, the cleavage lamina in the slate are more or less parallel to the axial planes of the folds; but in the grit- stone, they deviate into fan-shaped arrange- ments, which.on a small scale resemble the i laminar structure of Mont Blanc, Here also, as in Diagram 21, the cleavage fissures, on passing through the harder substance, deviate toward a direction perpendicular to its surface. When the axes of the con- tortions of such a bed as g (the hard grit- stone) pass in different directions, the clea- vage invariably passes through the centre of them in planes coincident with the axes, This is on a small scale the same law as_ ||! that already quoted from Professor Rogers, the cleavage plane in each case bisecting | the flexures. The author just named pre- ca WM mull MW, pies a) ZI ‘] sents us with a drawing (Diagram 26) very well suited to explain his idea of fan-like cleavage planes, in materials of unlike nature, and bent anticlinally*. * Trans. of Roy. Soc. of Edinburgh, 1856. 1856. a 26 386 REPORT—1856. § 7. Cleavage accompanied by change of dimensions in Rocks. In rocks subject to cleavage, the parts of the mass have undergone some change of place; and the whole mass has suffered compression in one di- rection. This will be evident from the following facts :— (a.) Surfaces of stratification are frequently undulated and wrinkled by edges of cleavage. Thus in Diagram 27, let S be a surface of stra- tification, K a plane of cleavage, and J a vertical joint. The cleavage edges are often traced on the bed S by undulated, interrupted ridges and hollows, which appear in no other surfaces, and suggested to me the idea of a “creeping movement among the particles of the rock, along the plane of cleavage, the effect of which was to roll them forward, in a direc- tion always uniform, over the same tract of country.” In this expression the term ‘ creep ’ is borrowed from experience in collieries, where argillaceous strata are frequently thrown into undulations which slowly propagate themselves under continued pressure. : These undulations are often formed on a plane highly inclined to the axis of pressure, as in the case of slaty cleavage. The interrupted character of the ridges and furrows on the plane of the strata arises sometimes from the unequal yielding power of the materials. (4.) These undulations are really due to pressure of some kind, and affect the figure of shells and other flexible and compressible objects on the sur- faces of the strata, so that in the direction of the dip of the strata these objects are often much shortened in dimension. ‘ Thus a thin object originally circular, fig. 28 (as Orbicula), becomes short- ened to an elliptical figure, fig. 29, on the plane, and arched, as fig. 30, in the section. Thus it is certain that the effect of cleavage is to cause relative “motion among the parts of stratified rocks,” such as would be produced by a compression in the direction perpendicular to cleavage. Fig. 28. Fig. 29. Fig. 30. | | /} ] Hf IN “mT fl | i] Timm I am not aware of any observations on record regarding these curious — pheenomena of change of place in the parts of a slaty mass prior to 1843, when I communicated them with other facts to the British Association at Cork*. One of the points then much insisted on was the fact of the move- TT prnit * “On certain movements in the parts of Stratified Rocks,” Reports of Brit. Assoc. 1843, p. 61. ‘instance coincident with S), . the internal movements of the ON CLEAVAGE AND FOLIATION IN ROCKS. 387 ment uniformly in the line of the dip of the strata of the parts of symmetrical fossils like trilobites, Zingule, Spirifere ; so that, when presented in one direction, these objects were shortened,—in a direction at right angles to the former they were relatively lengthened (really narrowed), and in an inter- mediate direction distorted, fig. 31. And the change of figure was employed as a measure of the movement on the plane of stratification, viz. } or ¢ an inch in the common trilobite of Llandeilo (Ogygia Buchit), equals 5th or ith of the whole space. The movement does not seem, in the case of Irish or North Devon rocks, to have affected the thicker and harder shells, but only those which were thin, as also the Algz and Trilobites ; the latter in Llandeilo flags are often covered with little folds, or even thread-like striations parallel to the wave of motion, fig. 32, which, when lying right across the axis of figure, may deceive an inexperienced person into the sup- position of a real transverse striation. The same thing occurs in North Devon, and in the south of Ireland. Fig. 31. (c.) By attending carefully to the surfaces of stratification and marking the phenomena on these surfaces where they are modified by cleavage, an- other curious and important structure is indicated, which | appears to have escaped pub- lication, though I learn with pleasure that it has not been unobserved by Sedgwick. Let S be the strike of a bed, o the strike of cleavage on the surface of the bed, and parallel to it (not in this 3 r Wf / Yy 4 Go a) Me yy : J ridges and furrows indicating mass, ra ; 2c2 388 REPORT—1856. In the remarkable case sketched, the ridges and hollows assume a regu- larity of wavy interruptions which appear the effect of concretionary forces whose axes cross the bed, the concretions being subsequently pressed by cleavage, so that the rock can sometimes be practically divided by art, and in other cases is found actually divided by nature into irregular oblong solids whose axis is parallel to the line of dip of the cleavage. Phanomena of this order are observable among the slaty rocks of Westmoreland (Win- dermere Head, Bowness), and in some tracts of South Wales (Llandowror), but they do not yield good slate. In some cases the irregular surface of the beds is apparently due to ori- ginal ripple structure, which by the general movement of the mass of the rock across the cleavage planes, have acquired superposed wrinkles parallel to the cleavage edges. ‘Thus in several cases may the planes of stratification be clearly distinguished from joints. The steps thus placed for a mechanical theory of the series of changes by which the structural characters and accidents of position in slate rocks might be determined, were relaid with care, and strengthened by new observations, by Mr. D. Sharpe*. In the quarries of South Petherwin, where argillaceous, ochraceous, and calcareous beds occur, the former are wholly cleft, the latter partially so, or rather cracked, the soft ochreous beds not marked by cleavage. In the argil- laceous slate the thinner and more tender fossils are much changed in figure, the encrinite columns not so. The distortion is greatest where the angle between the planes of cleavage and stratification is least. The contraction of dimensions in the plane of the strata on the line perpendicular to the strike of cleavage, is estimated at one-fourth, and there is an expansion in the plane of cleavage on the line of the dip. Mr. Sharpe’s general result is expressed in these distinct terms :—“ From these and similar cases, we learn that the shells have been compressed by a force acting in a direction perpen- dicular to the planes of cleavage, and that the compression of the mass between the cleavage planes has been counterbalanced by its expansion in a direction corresponding to the dip of the cleavage.” And again, “ As the expansion of the rock in one direction may have been caused by its com- pression in the contrary direction, it follows that all the effects yet described may have originated in the compression of the mass of the rock in a direction perpendicular to the cleavage planes.” The oblique pressures which appear to have affected many shells in the planes of stratification and produced such extraordinary distortions as that of Spirifera disjuncta (Diagram 34 a, com- pared with 34 5), “ may always be resolved into the same two direct forces ; one forwards along the plane of cleavage towards the intersection of the cleavage and the bedding, the other downwards in a direction perpendicular to the cleavage. When the bedding and cleavage exactly coincide at Tin- tagel, the shells are flattened and drawn out considerably, even 50 per cent. in one direction,’ —the direction 3 . being, doubtless, that of the line Fig. 34a. Fig. 346. of dip of the cleavage plaues. Mr. Sharpe thus concludes this part of his investigation :— “Tt may be asserted as probable, that all rocks affected by that pe- culiar fissile character which we call staty cleavage have under- gone,— * See Geol. Proc. 1846 and 1848, ee “an ON CLEAVAGE AND FOLIATION IN ROCKS. 389 1. A compression of their mass in a direction everywhere perpendicular to the planes of cleavage. “2. An expansion of their mass along the planes of cleavage in the direc- tion of a line at right angles to the line of incidence of the planes of bedding and cleavage; or in other words, in the direction of the dip of the cleavage. **3. No proof has been found that the rock has suffered any change in the direction of the strike of the cleavage planes. We must therefore pre- sume that the masses of rock have not been altered in that direction.” These conclusions, presented in 1846, on the sure evidence of the changed forms of shells, trilobites, &c., were extended in 1848 to slates in which no traces of any organic forms had been observed. The evidence in this case was found by examination of the mechanical structure of the slates, especially by certain apparently brecciated slates including masses of discernible mag- nitude, and distinct colour and quality. Such are frequent in Westmoreland . and Cumberland about Rydal, in Langdale, Patterdale and Borrowdale. “In all these slaty breccias, the included masses are flatter between the planes of cleavage than in any other direction. Their flattest sides are always parallel to the cleavage planes,—they are usually rather longer on the line of dip of the cleavage than along the strike,—thus confirming the opinion that the rocks have expanded in the direction of the dip of the cleavage.” The Diagram No. 35 represents the appearance of the included masses on Fig. 35. the plane of cleavage, they being somewhat elongated in the line of dip ; while Diagram 36 gives the ap- pearance of similar masses on the edge of the same sheet of slate, the fragments being all more or less flat- tened between the planes of cleavage. It is curious to observe in some of these brecciated slates which have undergone much metamorphosis, crystals which have suffered no change by compression. These cry- stals (e. g. garnets) have probably been generated in the mass by the metamorphic actions consequent on communicated heat. It is obvious, that with such a structure the easy cleavage of slate in parallel planes is completely pro- vided for. Moreover, in each sheet of slate, where the parts are sensibly \ extended in the direction of dip, there is a somewhat greater facility of fracture in that direction than in any other. This comparative facility of fracture is called by Mr. Sharpe “se- condary cleavage*;” it is of some importance in the working of slate, and gives rise to the terms “end” (e in fig. 35), and “side” (s in fig. 36). Slates are best split by inserting the tool at the end. The labours of Mr. Sorby + now claim attention. Accustomed to investigate * This term is not used in the same sense by other writers. + Edinb. New Phil. Journal, 1853. 490 REPORT— 1856. the structure of rocks by the microscope, and especially by the use of thin sections, he has applied this method of research to ascertain the origin of slaty cleavage. In the course of a careful examination of contortions in North Wales and Devonshire, he was convinced that they indicate a very con- siderable amount of lateral pressure, the thickness of the contorted beds being very different in one part to what it is in another (see Diagram 25). In the case referred to, the amount of compression inferred is so great, that points which appear to have been 38 inches apart, are now at the distance of only 9 inches. Unyielding parts have been contorted, yielding parts simply pressed together in one direction and extended in another. The green spots so often seen in purple slate, also indicate great change of dimensions in the mass. In rocks without cleavage they appear spherical ; in cleaved slates they are found to be compressed in the perpendicular to cleavage, elongated in the line of its dip; so that, if originally spherical, they have become ellipsoids of three dimensions, the shortest axis lying across the cleavage, the longest in the line of cleavage dip, while the third axis of intermediate length coincides with the strike of the cleavage. These three axes, in a case not supposed to be extreme, though doubtless above the average, in the slates of Llanberis and Penrhyn, are found as 1 : 3°75:6; from which it follows that the sphere has been compressed to less than half the original bulk (as 3°75° to I x 3°75 x 6:0), or as 100 to 43. In a mass so compressed, the relative angular positions Fig. 37. of all the particles not exactly perpendicular to the line of pressure or exactly parallel to it would be changed. Supposing the particles, or some of them, to be unsym- metrical (as they mostly are in the brecciated slates, and indeed in most kinds of slate), and that their lengths were equally presented in all directions, or inclined at all angles to the plane perpendicular to the line of pres- sure,—we shall find after compression their inclination 6! by the formula tan poe where ¢ is the ratio of c the longer to the shorter axis of the ellipse representing the compression, @ the original angle, and 6! the angle to which it has been changed by compression. In the case assumed above c=6, where @ and 6! appear in the following Table :— Originally. After compression. v= =="? rf 10 1 4! 20 ao 30 5 30 40 7 58 50 11 14 60 16 6 70 24 36 80 43 23 90 90 O Or suppose in a smali part of the original mass the particles to be so dis- tributed as to occasion ten planes of equal fissility, having the same strike, and surrounding the same axis, and inclined to one another 10°,—this part of the mass, after undergoing compression ¢ (6:1), would still possess ten cleavage planes, but they would be inclined to one another as in Diagram 38, which corresponds to the calculation just given. ———— © a ' 5° on each side of a given position we had assumed a very ON CLEAVAGE AND FOLIATION IN ROCKS, 391 By inspection of this figure, the great tendency of a mass so penetrated by secret fissures to split in planes ap- proximately parallel is evident. This tendency may be exhibited numerically for any particular angle of inclina- tion to the plane of principal cleavage. “If we suppose (says Mr. Sorby) that in a mass of rock there were 600 particles having their longer axes lying in the space included within 5° on each side of positions inclined at 0°, 10°, 20°, &c. to the line of pressure, so that they were uniformly distributed, as is nearly the case in thick-bedded uncleaved rocks, then, after compres- sion in the ratio 1 : 6, their distribution would be changed, as shown in the following Table* :— Inclination to the direction Original Subsequent of the pressure. distribution. distribution. Pry ey FN Po ai 100 CEP ENE. DOE Wels sear ows wit) oe f339 103 so Ma Sle ar Po a z 113 IU cake cat hee -. 134 Be ect 600 in each case.< "7!" 986 Setar ec Shee ey PN ONT Ie ORBIT) 376 ee a ap EES DOC IT AORTA, Sa 733 MA A aaa -- 1825 ee Ss Wists often 3324.” These numbers exhibit the relative tendency to cleavage in each are of 10° in the compressed mass. If instead of small angle only, the tendency to fissility along the prin- cipal cleavage plane, as compared to that perpendicular to it in the line of strike, would have been as 36: 1. The structure here assigned by calculation does actu- ally occur in slaty rocks, but not in others. ‘“ The water of Ayr stone, which has no cleavage, consists of mica and a very few grains of quartz sand, imbedded in a large proportion of decomposed felspar ; the peroxide of iron being collected to certain centres, and having the character — of peroxidized pyrites. The flakes of mica do not lie in the plane of the bedding, but are inclined at all angles; so that there is no definite plane of structural weakness independent of that due to bedding’’ But in a rock of similar composition having cleavage, a section cut perpendicular to cleavage in the line of its dip, shows by far the greater part of the flakes of mica in- clined at low angles, so that the majority lie within 20° on each side of it, being most numerous in and nearly in the plane of cleavage,—twenty times as many nearly in it as nearly in the plane of 45° to it, and very few at 90°. - In a section perpendicular to cleavage, and in the line of strike, there is still a preponderance of flakes of mica in and near the plane of cleavage, but in a less marked degree. On the plane of cleavage itself, a slight tendency to arrangement of the flakes parallel to the line of dip is observable. One of the latest and most instructive of Mr. Sorby’s observations relates to the cleavage of Devonian limestones. Ina specimen from Kings Kerswell near Torquay, the cleavage pressure has affected the whole mass of the rock, * Phil. Mag., January 1856. 392 | REPORT—1856. including the encrinites, which are found with their substance compressed and crushed so as to occupy, in the direction of the perpendicular to cleavage, only a quarter of the space they fill in the direction of cleavage dip. Thus the originally nearly equiaxed cells of the encrinital stem are altered by cleavage to elongated fusiform shapes, whose longer axes are parallel, and four times as great as the shorter axes. Even erystals of calcareous spar and dolomite are found crushed, bent and broken up, so as to be with difficulty recognizable. f The instances thus collected of the movements of the parts of the rocks subject to slaty cleavage, in directions normal to the planes of cleavage, have been, if possible, made more convincing by imitative experiments, which show that some of the phenomena of cleavage are attainable by means of pressure in materials composed of particles capable of change of figure, or change of position. Mr. Sorby, observing by the microscope that in certain uncleaved stones (e.g. water of Ayr stone) mica occurred in plates inclined | evenly in all directions,—while in slates in which cleavage was manifest the mica was found more collected on the cleavage planes and inclined at low angles to it,—a circumstance directly deducible from the phenomena of com- pression already proved,—made a cleavable mass in the following manner * :— He mixed scales of oxide of iron with soft pipe-clay, so that the scales lay evenly in all direction as in water of Ayr stone, and then pressed it so as as to alter the dimensions of the mass in the same proportion as the slate of Llanberis already referred to. Having then dried and baked it, he examined the interior state of the substance by rubbing smooth faces, one face perpen- dicular to pressure and in the line of elongation or dip; another in what represented the line of strike, and a third face in the plane of the pressure corresponding to the cleavage plane. The particles of oxide of iron were found distributed just as mica is in well-cleaved slate; the mass was capable of easily splitting parallel to the pressure planes, but not across them. Professor Tyndall has more recently taken up this part of the subject, and has produced a variety of results, confirming and extending the inge- nious reasonings and experiments of Mr. Sorby+t. Perhaps his most re- markable experiment is that made with pure white wax, which in the ordi- nary state admits of fracture in all directions equally, and contains no unequiaxed particles like mica and scales of oxide of iron. This substance, being subject to pressure}, is found to have acquired true slaty structure, even in a higher degree than any known slate, for it splits to much finer and more equal lamin. “The finer the slate the more perfect will be the resem- blance of its cleavage to that of the wax,” is the conclusion of the author of this instructive experiment. The experiments and reasonings of Professor Tyndall, Mr. Sorby, and Mr. Sharpe, will again come under review in a future Report, when the theory of slaty cleavage may be examined, and the ‘mechanical pressure’ which these authors advocate may be placed in comparison with the crystalline polarity, formerly advanced by Prof. Sedgwick. ‘The veined structure of glaciers, which reminded Professor J. Forbes of the analogous lamination in slates,—an idea since expressed by Rogers and Tyndall,—and Mr. Fox’s in- genious imitation of slaty cleavage by electrical currents passing through clay, will then receive the attention which they merit. * Edinb. New Phil. Journal, July 1853. tT Lecture to the Royal Institution, June 6, 1856. =~ The wax is kneaded with the fingers, aud pressed between thick plates of glass pre- viously wetted. In cold weather, or when cooled by a freezing mixture, it splits beau- tifully. 3 r j ON CLEAVAGE AND FOLIATION IN ROCKS, 393 § 8. Secondary Cleavage of Slate. It is difficult to break slates of the usual thickness (about 1th of an inch) so as to produce surfaces even rudely rectangled to the plane of cleavage; a circumstance which need occasion no surprise. But in this respect two lines may be chosen in the slate, along one of which the rudely perpendi- cular fracture may occasionally be looked for; this is the line of dip,—on the other it can hardly be produced even with the utmost care; this is parallel to the strike. In experiments for this purpose, it should be observed whether the surfaces produced by fracture on lines parallel to the strike tend to parallelism. If a sheet of slate be laid on two supports parallel to and equidistant from the strike edges, it may be found that at one of these edges fracture will be more easy than at the other. Then turn over the slate to see if the facts will be reversed, and the other edge give the easiest fracture. [An observation in the affirmative is in my note book, for 1836, at Llanberis. I shall be glad to know if it has been noticed by others in this or other localities. ] Hence it appears probable, that besides the principal cleavage, some slates contain a secret lamination, or ‘ secondary cleavage,’ which occasions a par- tial fissility ; but in general this kind of structure produces no such distinct appearances in the blocks and masses as to be often recognized on a great scale. Some cases in which I had supposed such a structure to be real and important, turned out on further research to be merely examples of symme- trical jointing. Prof. Sedgwick, however, refers me for satisfactory instances to the old black slates of Buttermere, and to the vicinity of Yspytty Evan, in North Wales. One of the cases in which a second set of cleavage planes was supposed to cross the principal cleavage frequently and regularly, is the “pencil bed ” of Skiddaw slate dug in Westmoreland, near Shap. Mr. Sharpe has exa- mined this curious rock, and finds in one case (Thornthwaite Gill) the prin- cipal cleavage parallel to the original beds and dipping N.W. 60°; the secondary cleavage crosses it nearly at right angles and dips S.E. between 20° and 30°. In another case (Rosgill Moor) the beds dip N.E. 30°; the principal cleavage N. by W. 60°; the secondary cleavage S. by E.15°. By natural decomposition, small square prisms are produced, whose sides mea- sure one-quarter to half an inch across, and these may be sometimes split again parallel to the faces. Mr. Sorby has found proof that this so-called ‘secondary cleavage’ is due to many small parallel joints. The following case occurred to me in North Wales, in 1836:—A sheet of slate was excavated into a notch on one dip-edge, and the other struck by a heavy tool on the opposite point (the plane of cleavage being held vertical) ; it yielded along a zigzag line so as to show two sets of planes on the fracture meeting each other at 90° + on the plane of cleavage, but with a common edge oblique to the plane (70° and 110°). This I regard as a case of secret jointing, and wish to know if any thing of the kind has been observed by others. § 9. Relation of Cleavage to Joints. The joints which traverse cleavage, in well-cleaved and massive slate rocks, show much regularity for short spaces, and often present the same or nearly equal angles of intersection. After examining and measuring innumerable instances, I believe that this apparent symmetry is not delusive, and that by a careful classification of joints with reference to the plane of stratification and the plane of cleavage, some data of importance in the theory of their origin may be obtained. An example of joints seen on a plane of stratifica- 394 REPORT—1856. tion ae in 1836) in the quarries of Dolbadarn, will illustrate this remark. In this case, a and 6, which meet each other Fig. 39. at a right angle on the plane of the strata, are also perpendicular to that plane, and may be regarded as depending on it,—while ¢ and d, on the contrary, seem to depend on the plane of cleavage, for they are perpendicular to it and to each other. a and 0 predominate in coarse beds where cleavage is least developed ; cand d in fine slate; 6 is not a joint, but a ‘band,’ or as it is called in Ribblesdale, a ‘ row’ Dee RSC — \ ! or small regular fold. The joint here marked ¢ constitutes what \ \EF in the Dolbadarn quarries is sometimes called ‘Level bottom ;’ and where the ‘split’orclea- ‘¢ Zz ad \a@_ \ vage dips from the vertical 4 inches in a yard eS to the S.E., the ‘level bottom’ deviates as much from the horizontal to the N.W. The joint marked d makes the ‘square ends’ of the same quarries, from which ‘ bevel ends’ differ by the want of strict perpendicularity with the ‘split.’ The joint marked a seems to be what is called ‘ Crub,’—said to ‘steal away the level bottom ;’ c/ marks undulated lines on the bed formed by the edges of the cleavage. Green veins in this place follow the split-level, and dip here west 42°; parallel to these are the variations of colour—the changes of texture—the boundaries of the workable slate: ‘wrinkles’ are also parallel to them, being, in fact, dis- continuous small strata, often useful in marking and measuring the effect of a fault. § 10. Oceurrence of structures analogous to Cleavage near G'reenstone Dykes. “A case of this kind fell under the author's notice in 1834, at Coley Hill near Newcastle*. In the annexed cut d is a Greenstone dyke, nearly verti- Fig. 40. cal, and between 20 and 30 feet across, ranging east and west, and appearing at the surface. “‘s is the ordinary coal shale, which is, as usual, very much laminated at a moderate distance (a few yards) from the dyke, and contains fern leaves and other plants between the laminz. “ At the sides of the dyke the hori- zontal lamination is obscured, the slaty mass is indurated, and traversed by numerous vertical divisional planes parallel to the faces of the dyke, most numerous near the dyke, so as to occur in every half-inch of breadth, but becoming less and less abundant in the parts removed from the dyke till they entirely vanish. On the horizontal section, the lines of these vertical planes would, on a minute scale, represent the cleavage edges of slate.” Another remarkable case occurred to me while examining the great green- stone dyke, of Brockhill, in the Abberley district, first described by Murchi- son. This dyke measures 30 feet across; its structure is rather tabular than prismatic; it divides the sandstones and marls of the old red series. ‘ For * Treatise on Geology, vol. ii. p. 86, first edition (1839). — ON CLEAVAGE AND FOLIATION IN ROCKS. 395 a space of 30 feet on the north and 17 feet on the south of the dyke, the _ sandstones and marls are changed in hardness, texture and structure, so that i ae for these breadths they are excavated with the trap; and from their density, hardness, and resemblance to basalt, amygdaloid or porphyry, may be easily mistaken for primeval rocks of fusion. They have been literally baked under pressure, not roasted with freedom of access and escape for volatile matter.” —“ In regarding the structures of the stratified rocks, we observe that on approaching toward the dyke the stratification grows less distinct and sud- denly becomes untraceable ; that instead of it, especially on the south side, a great abundance of angularly intersecting divisional planes occur, so as to produce prismatic structures perpendicular to the plane of the dyke. Further, we observe, parallel to the dyke, to a distance of 30 or more feet from it, several very long, very straight, nearly vertical joints, continuous through all the beds, without any sign of vertical displacement, or any mark of lateral disturbance, unless the appearance of broad striation or narrow fluting, which horizontally marks the vertical sandstone surface, 30 feet from the dyke on the north side, be of the nature of slickenside, and referrible to lateral movement*.” If these examples be attentively considered, it will appear that under the circumstances described—heat being probably the principal agent, and pres- sure very little if at all evident—the following changes occur, near to and parallel to the heating surfaces :— 1. Extinction of the stratified structure. 2. Production of a new structure. 3. Accompanied in one case by great molecular and mineral changes. But it must be remarked, that the change indicated in the second of these sentences is really distinct from that which slate has undergone. Slate is cleavable in all its parts, more or less perfectly ; because its ultimate mole- cular texture is altered to such a condition ; near these dykes the rocks are cleft indeed, but not further cleavable; split, but not traversed by numerous planes of easy fissility. I have seen phenomena of a somewhat similar character, but less marked, near great faults, as, for example, in the line of the Craven fault in Yorkshire. § 11. The Cleat in Coal. In the northern coal districts of England, and in other tracts, there exists, besides the lamination parallel to the bounding surfaces of the beds, a series of approximate often nearly vertical divisional surfaces, along which the coal admits of easy fissility. This structure is called cleat, and it is of the greatest importance in coal working, since parallei to it the ‘ headways’ are driven in the ‘ post and stall’ workings of Northumberland and Durham, and parallel to it the ‘ banks’ are wrought in the ‘long wall’ and ‘board and end’ systems of Yorkshire and Derbyshire. Cleat is little affected by fractures, or undulations of the strata. It has usually one persistent course across a large district, the same direction often obtains in neighbouring districts, and even prevails over the whole of a great carboniferous region. ‘Thus in North- umberland and Durham the cleat runs most generally to the north-west (true); its ‘strike’ is in that direction. The most general strike of the beds is to the N.N.E. The same direction of cleat is prevalent in Yorkshire and Derbyshire, and this whether the beds strike eastward, as near Leeds and Sheffield ; or southward, as near Huddersfield and Chesterfield. The same direction prevails in Lancashire. * Memoirs of Geological Survey of Great Britain, vol. ii. pt. 1, p. 156. 396 - - REPORT—1856. ‘There are some cases in which the cleat varies in its direction from the normal strike, and degree or inclination, even (as I have been informed*) in different parts of one bed of coal. From frequent inspections of cleat in its ordinary state and near trap dykes and near faults, I conceive that no doubt can exist of its being a peculiar structure, more resembling the effect of aggregation under polar attractions than anything else. Coal affected by it is not properly ‘cleavable’ like slate, but actually cleft into numerous parallel, nearly vertical tables, whose general direction is remarkably uniform amidst many variations of other concomitant conditions. Neither heat nor pressure seem to be specially indicated by the phzno- mena of cleat, which on the whole most resemble the jointed structure of rocks, where that is manifested on the smallest scale and in greatest regu- larity, 7.e. where the dips of the strata are most uniform, and all the conco- mitant conditions are the most regular. Joints, like cleat, have very preva- lent directions in given districts, and inclinations to the strata tending to one angular value in one bed. In parallel beds of the same mineral nature and in the same series of strata, their strike and dip are often the same. In beds of a different mineral nature joints vary in character; and in a given series of argillaceous, calcareous and coarse arenaceous rocks, we may find many plane close joints in the argillaceous beds, inclined fOr -+ to the strata; a few large continuous fissures in the limestone nearly perpendicular to the beds; and a varying number of irregular rents in the sandstone. Addendum (1857).—Very lately Professor Haughton has instituted accu- rate measures and calculations founded on the distortion of fossils in cleaved rocks, and has obtained numerical results which concur with those of Mr. Sharpe and Mr. Sorby already referred to, in regard to the proof of pressure in a direction perpendicular to the cleavage plane; they, however, for the most part, do not indicate greater relative extension on the line of cleavage dip than on the line of cleavage strike. On the Stratigraphical Distribution of the Oolitic Echinodermata. By Tuomas Wrieut, M.D., F.R.S.E. [A communication ordered to be printed entire among the Reports.] Aut the classes of the animal kingdom, when viewed in relation to their stratigraphical distribution, are not of the same value to the paleontologist. Some Mollusca, as the Conchifera and Gasteropoda, have a much greater extension in time than the Cephalopoda, and among the Radiata, Corals and Echinoderms may be adduced as examples of classes whose species had a limited life in time; in estimating the value of paleontological evidence, it is therefore necessary to take into consideration this important fact, which has not received the attention it is so justly entitled to. The Echinodermata, although occupying a low position in the animal series, in a zoological point of view, still afford the paleontologist most important data for discussing questions relative to the distribution of species in time and space, for it is well known that the Silurian, Devonian, and Car- boniferous rocks are all characterized by distinct forms of Crinoidea, most of * Mr. John Buddle gave me an instance of this in the High Main coal of Newcastle, in 1834. tT Phil. Mag. December 1856. OOLITIC ECHINODERMATA. 397 | which are limited in their range to the different stages of these great groups. It is the object of.this paper to show that the species of the Oolitic Echino- dermata had a limited range in time, and that the different stages of the Oolitic formations are characterized by species which are special to each. Dr. William Smith was doubtless aware of the value of the Echinodermata in stratigraphical geology, for he carefully noted the different species known to him which characterized the secondary rocks; and it is a remarkable fact, that although our knowledge of the species of this class has been nearly quadrupled since the publication of his works*, still the outlines sketched by the hand of our great master remain nearly the same as laid out by him. The test of the Echinodermata constitutes an internal and integral part of the body of the animal, participating in its life, intimately connected with the organs of digestion, respiration, and generation, as well as with those of vision and locomotion, and having consequently many of the distinctive characters of the organism indelibly impressed on portions of its skeleton. The individual plates which compose the columns of the test of the EcHINoIDEA, and the ossicula which form the skeletons of the ASTEROIDEA, OPHIUROIDEA, and CRINOIDEA, are organized after distinct plans; they are therefore of great value in determining the species, as the specific characters are often well pre- served on even fragmentary portions of the skeleton; for this reason the remains of this class are of the highest value in stratigraphical geology, and second to no other class of the animal kingdom in importance. In the Ecurno1peEa the body is spheroidal, oval, depressed or discoidal, and enclosed in a calcareous test or shell composed of ten columns of large plates constituting the inter-ambulacral areas ; and ten columns of small plates constituting the ambulacral areas, which segments are separated from each other by ten rows of holes constituting the poriferous zones. ‘ihe external surface of the plates is studded- with tubercles of different sizes, in the dif- ferent families ; to these are articulated, by a kind of ball-and-socket joint, the spines, which are of different sizes, forms, and dimensions in the different families, and serve to characterize the genera and species, At the summit of the test is the apical disc, composed of five genital plates perforated for the passage of the ovarial and seminal canals; and five ocular plates notched or perforated for lodging the eyes: in one family, the SaLz- NIAD#, an additional or suranal plate, composed of one or many pieces, is in- troduced within the circle formed by the genital and ocular plates. There are two great apertures in the shell, one for the mouth, which is always at the base ; the other for the anus, which occupies different positions on the test; in one section it is in the centre of the upper surface, directly opposite to the mouth, and surrounded by the genital and ocular plates; ina second section the vent is external to the circle of genital plates, and never opposite to the mouth, but situated in different positions in relation to that opening, being placed on the upper surface, on the sides, the border, the infra- border or the base, in the different groups. The mouth is sometimes armed with a complicated apparatus of jaws and teeth, but it is sometimes edentulous, or provided with lobes formed of the plates of the test itself. The AsTEROIDEA have a depressed stelliform body provided with five or more lobes or hollow arms, which are a continuation of the body, and contain prolongations of the viscera, The mouth is always below and central, and rows of tubular retractile suckers occupy the centre of the rays. The com- * Strata identified by Organized Fossils, 4to, 1816, Stratigraphical System of Organized Fossils, 4to, 1817. 398 REPORT—1856. plicated skeleton is composed of numerous solid calcareous ossicula, variable as to number, size and arrangement in the different genera which they serve to characterize. Their coriaceous integument is studded with calcareous spines of various forms, and they have a spongy madreporiform body on the upper surface of the dise near the angle between two rays; reptation is accom- plished by the retractile tubular ambulacral suckers. The Oprururorpea have a distinct depressed discoidal body provided with long slender arms, in which there is no excavation for any prolongation of the viscera ; they are special organs of locomotion, independent of the visceral cavity, and provided with spines which are developed on their sides; the mouth is basal and central, and surrounded by membranous tentacula. The skeleton is composed of a series of plates which form the disc or centrum, and the long slender rays are sustained by numerous elongated vertebrate- like ossicula, having numerous plates or spines disposed along the borders of the rays to assist in reptation. The form, structure and arrangement of the discal plates, and of the ossicles of the rays, afford good characters for distinguishing the genera. The Crino1pEA have a distinct bursiform body formed of a calyx, com- posed of a definite number of plates, provided with five solid rays, which are independent of the visceral cavity, and adapted for prehension ; they have a distinct mouth and vent, no retractile suckers, and the ovaries open at the base of the arms into special apertures. The skeleton is extremely compli- cated, being composed of many thousands of ossicula closely articulated to- gether, the number, form and arrangement of which are determinate in the different families, the multiples of five being the numbers which in general predominate ; the central plate of the calyx is supported on a long jointed column composed of circular, pentagonal or stelliform plates, the articulating surfaces of which are sculptured with crenulations that interlock into each other; in many genera the stem was attached by a calcareous root to the bed of sea, and supported the calyx and arms upwards like a plant; in others it appears to have been moveable, and was used as a point of suspension from submarine bodies, the calyx and arms having had a pendent position. The mouth is central and prominent, and the vent opens near its side ; the arms are mostly ramose and multiarticulate, and when extended they formed a net-like instrument of considerable dimensions. The four orders of the Echinodermata thus briefly described are the only ones found fossil in the oolitic rocks, and of these by far the largest number of species belong to the Ecuino1peA ; for this order I have proposed the fol- lowing classification, which differs in many essential particulars from that of previous authors. As the mouth is always basal, central, subcentral, or excentral, the excen- tricity being invariably towards the anterior border, this aperture does not afford a character of primary importance, although when taken in connexion with others it is valuable in the definition of families. The position of the anal opening affords a good primary character; in one section the vent opens within the centre of the apical disc, surrounded by the genital and ocular plates; in another section the vent opens without the apical disc, and is external to, and at a greater or less distance from, the genital and ocular plates: these two sections may be thus defined. Echinoidea endocyclica. A. Test circular, spheroiaal, more or less depressed, rarely oblong; mouth central and basal ; vent in the centre of the upper surface directly opposite 4 WW ee OOLITIC ECHINODERMATA. 399 to the mouth, and surrounded by the five perforated genital and the five ocular plates. Mouth always armed with five powerful calcareous jaws, formed of many elements disposed in a vertical direction. Echinoidea exocyclica. B. Test sometimes circular and hemispherical, oftener oblong, pentagonal, depressed, clypeiform or discoidal; mouth central or excentral ; vent ex- ternal to the circle of genital and ocular plates, never opposite the mouth, but situated in different positions in relation to that opening: four of the genital plates are generally perforated. ‘The mouth is sometimes armed with jaws, but is oftener edentulous. The jaws are disposed ina more or less horizontal direction. The structure of the ambulacral.areas and poriferous zones, the form, number, and arrangement of the tubercles and their spines, the presence or absence of fascioles or semite, the size and form of the elements of the apical disc, and the position of the anus, afford collectively good characters for de- fining the genera. The minute details in the structure of the plates; the size, form, and number of the tubercles on each ; the form and arrangement of the pores in the zones ; their proximity or remoteness from each other; the general out- line of the body, which has only certain limits of variation ; the character of the sculpture on the plates; the form of the areolas ; the greater or less pro- minence of the base; the size of the tubercle ; the presence or absence, the size and arrangement of the granules forming the areolar circle; the com- pleteness or incompleteness of the same ; the width of the miliary zone, the number and size of the rows of granules composing it ; the length of the spines; the form of their stems ; the character of the sculpture on them; the size of the head, and the prominence and milling of the ring,—are all details of struc- ture which individually and collectively afford good specific characters, as they are persistent details which are more or less developed on every consider- able fragment of the test and spines of the EcHINoIDEA. Taking these characters for our guidance, I have grouped the genera, already so numerous by the discovery of extinct forms, into the following natural families :— A Table, showing the Sections and Families of the Echinoidea. ORDER. SECTIONS. FAmMILIEs, f yeecisie A CIDARID&. Echinoidea endocyclica. Liam Seca bo wet : IADEMADZ, Vent within the genital plates, E always opposite the mouth. ——— SALENIADA. OrpEer ECHINOIDEA. EcHINOCONIDZ. CoLiyRiTID&. SEcTION B. EcHINONID. Echinoidea exocyclica. EcHINANTHIDZ. Vent without the genital plates, | EcHINOLAMFID. never opposite the mouth. CLYPEASTERID&. ' | EcHINOcORIDZz, SPATANGID. 400 REPORT—-1856. A Table, showing the Stratigraphical distribution of the genera and species of the Oolitic Echinodermata. Oolitic Group. Lower Division. Middle Division. | Upper Division. oP) Veh | Heel el Stole uel #| | 3/2. 4] 3] 2/4) e)a/S\ se e/Z21S| 2 (S| 2 | 2 (38 =) 93/5/9|8/ 3/6) 2/5] 2 ec lal & lal =| 2 les B/=|EEE| S| z|S|Z/E/B3|s| B]s) 2] 2 |e 3) 3/5) 8/3) 2/5) 2/5/S/38 8) S$ |al a | 5 lee s/s FA | Fe M718 pl mg] * 1&s Fam. Crparip&. Cidaris Edwardsii, Wright .........|..-| * Ilminsterensis, Wright.......+.|-+ woe —— Mooreii, Wright .....csececeee|-e:|eee] * Fowleri, Wright ......s+++000++|-+- sealer] —— Bouchardii, Wright ...........-|+++|-++|-+- * — Wrightii, Desor ........ Beane | suo see * — Bradfordensis, Wright.........}s+-|s++|se-|e++]--]-+e 00+] * florigemma, Phillips.........0++|-+2|+++|se+] +++ Ao Pod bee Bedee pag cose *| x —— Smithii, Wright ...ccccccceesecfece|eee|-ee|eoee|eee|eee]ece]eee weve] *] —— SpPinosa, AYASSIZ ..eseeseseeeeee|eee|ee oe Gee * —— Boloniensis, Wright.......+...J.++|+++|-+ eJaceleoe]eee|eccecefoee|ons * Rabdocidaris Moraldina, Cotteau ...|... * maxima, Miinster ......2cecsecee[eee|err|ece|ecslaeeleee| % Diplocidaris Desori, Wright .........|.+:|-++|-++ * —— Wrightii, Desor ....... eeccessglane) seal tee * —— Cotteauana, Wright...........-|-+++ seleee| oF Fam. HEMICIDARIDZ. Hemicidaris granulosa, Wright Sad cre| Pook —— pustulosa, Wright ......+00..-Jeos|rer|ee- * —— Stokesii, Wight ....ccceceeeeee[eee|eee|eee|eeefoes * — Luciensis, d’Orbigny .........|-0-|eee|eee|eee]eee]ere * ———_ MINOY, AGASSIZ coorssrsseeeerver|ere|ers|eeeleee|eoelere| —— Ramsayii, Wright...... eee Reel biel tal eel ised a aS —— Bravenderi, Wright .........+0+Jees|eor|ees]eoe]ee-|eee| * —— Wrightii, Desor ......sseecseveleee|ree[ere|oee|eee|oee [eee * ‘ —— Icaunensis, Cotteau ...ses.sceeefeeeeee[ene|ees|eee| eee] ¥ intermedia, Fleming......+++.+-|-0.|-+|see]ees|ere seeleee[eneleoeleec[eeeee * Davidsonii, Wright ........+...|... eee lessees | sa Soe) hoe ee Pine: eel BaeBeal baal Reece : * Purbeckensis, Forbes .....+ere|eee{ec[eee[eee|eoefeee{ece]eee | ceseetsl eos |veceus wa |gasdee|Seancr| OK Fam. DIADEMADZ. Pseudodiadema Mooreii, Wright ...|...|--- * —— depressum, Agassiz ......++++++|.-.|-+ saat Fi |ewe| ==) 3 — Parkinsoni, Desor .+....+0+---[eeeleee Dc ee IN * —— pentagonum, M‘Coy ......+++|-+/e+ Meal deletes | 2 — homostigma, Agassiz ......+.-|...].+- aut aless| cea ES. # Jeee[ —— Bailyi, Wright ...cccceecgeereseefene[eee * rec| cae. a] —— vagans, Phillips sss.-seeeeceers|oeelers So2]see| wae} ae slik leks| owe) -—— versipora, Phillips .....i.see0|eeefecefees[ers]ene BPA rel en |Pae bed ares) en. * —— hemispharicum, Agassiz ......|...|e0|se-|-+-Jeee|eee|eee|eeeece|eoeererer|ers ane radiatum, Wright........++ Brera eel cualecc|oual aaclace| ewe) cex| sae cael Seugm laa * mamillanuim, Roemer ......ceeleee|oee{ece[ere[eee|ene[eee[enelene [eee Shee Nec * Hemipedina Bechii, Broderip ......| * Bowerbankii, Wright .......+- * —— Jardinii, Wright .........cee0. [ee * OOLITIC ECHINODERMATA. 401 Oolitic Group. Lower Division. Middle Division. | Upper Division. a Bike Rae eS 3] Bloale -| .| S/-4/ 8] a] Bis : my om 3 a 4/4] 4/4] 5/a/Slale|4i22/°) #/°]| S$] 2 isa |S) | Oo n (9 GaP a 5 oO 3/4/5/S)8) 2/8! 3] z/So /4] 2 S| SF} 3 lee Bla] SB) 5/2lalsl SlSlseleei/Sl a iol & FREE Bl S| BV B/S) sl sislsisisais| §|s) 9] B15 2 3 2 By 3] 3/5] 3/3] 81S) EB/o}S5 5) Oo |B) # ojo asl 7} ae ed ed S| ag] = i S| —S | —| — | SS) | | SS | | | | | Hemipedina Etheridgii, Wright ,,,|...|... Bakeri, Wright. ..ccss.sesseveoee|ers —— perforata, Wright.....+..cseeees|++|s —— tetragramma, Wright .......,.Je+}e0.|-++ —— Waterhousei, Wright ......61.].+-|eve|e+ Bonei, Wright ......000.see-e0.[e9 —— Davidsoni, Wright .......... ae — Woodwardi, Wright ....... cae re lel spe latctatelebal ae — microgramma, Wright....... ALAZARARABBRALS ERE RIE —— Marchamensis, Wright ....+.)ee.|.c.Jeoe|er-foreleoslegs[one[ere|eee|eeseen| ¥ a Corallina, WIGhh. os geceesssssae soslecsleerleeeleeelerrlemeleneieerlees[aceeeeisee| | — tuberculosa, Wright,..-2....c0.|essJeec[ene|ersleeeferelecclenclere[ersfecesee|ede |] —— Morrisii, Wright ......,.:.00.c.Jecs}ece|es elsdalugalanaloge]-pelstelcas|ansaan|sar|detes * | Cunningtoni, Wright .........|...Jees{oer]es solecofeerlecelecesce|ses|eoseneleen] | Pedina rotata, Wright .....cccccssecsjere|eceleee] ® leesfoeeleselassdene] ¥ | —— Smithii, Forbes......,.c00-.seeesfeee * Fam. Ecuinipm. Glypticus hieroglyphicus, Goldfuss.|...|...|+«+|...|+« | Magnotia Forbesii, Wright .........|...|...|-+ Polycyphus Normannus, Desor ...|..-|...|-+- | —— Deslongchampsii, Wright ...|...}...|-+ | Stomechinus germinans, Phillips...|. ea - intermedius, Agassiz A | —— bigranularis, Lamarck. .........|.,.|...|++ microcyphus, Wright .........|...Jso-|+s+]+ ——— Byratus, AGAssiz woe pssscceeese [eee Fam. SALENIADA, Acrosalenia minuta, Buckman ...... —— Lycettii, Wright ............66|. ——- pustulata, Forbes ..........5 — Wiltonii, Wright ...,........+. - decorata, Haime ............ weet et eeeleee j Fam. EcHinoconipz. | Holectypus depressus, Leske.........Jecesee|eee hemispheericus, Desor .........|...|...{s« - Oblongus, Wright... ...ceesseee|ecelecefeeefoee|enelece [er -conoideus, Wright ........s00e|..-leaeler Morrisii, Wright ......... meaagalscctuns umbrella, Lamarck .eccescesseelecs|ecelees Fam, ECHINOBRISSID. Echinobrissus clunicularis, Lhwyd..}...|...|... —— orbicularis, Phillips ......+0006|...|.4.eefee. P= MAJOT, Agassiz ....0....0ecepeees|eecfoes|ere lore —— Woodwardii, Wright .........|.e.Jeec[eee —— dimidiatus, Phillips .........s00|0+. ~~ 1856. " eeeleeeloseleaclconleerlerelevelsenieererri eee 402 Echinobrissus scutatus, Lamarck Clypeus sinuatus, Leske... —— Agassizi, Wright . altus, MSCoy.....ccscocccccsssses — Michelini, Wright ........... Hugii, Agassiz ........ — Solodurinus, Agassiz ......40 — emarginatus, Phillips .........|.+ Fam. CoLLyritTip&. Collyrites ringens, Desor .........05 ovalis, Parkinson ....... Hyboclypus agariciformis, Forbes... —— gibberulus, dgassiz ..... —— Ovalis, Wright ..,.....seecceseee Fam. EcHINANTHID. Pygurus depressus............. : pentagonalis, Phillips .. aeiignaeeel — Phillipsii, Wright.........c0000. —— giganteus, Wright Order ASTEROIDEA. Fam. URASTERID. Uraster Gaveyi, Forbes .....ssssss00s Fam. SoLaAsTERID&. Solaster Moretonis, Forbes .. seeeeee Fam. GoNIASTERID. Goniaster Hamptonensis, Wright...|... — obtusus, Wright ......+66.4. Fam. AsTERID#. Tropidaster pectinatus, Forbes......|... Astropecten Hastingsiz, Forbes . Orion, Forbes .......0ce000e — Phillipsii, Forédes .......... — Cotteswoldie, Buckman .. — Wittsii, Wright...... — Forhesii, Wright ......s.ssee0e —— arenicolus, Goldfuss...... rectus, M‘Coy Aharon Luidia Murchisoni, Williamson Order OPHIUROIDEA. Fam. OrHiuRIDz. Ophioderma Gaveyi, Wright —— Milleri, Phillips ...cccccccscecelese Lower Lias. Sees Od bee caudatus, Wright .........00+ 41) : Blumenbachii, Koch & Dunker ae Bi ser eseseeserlene senslens seeleacleee|. er eeeleceleee REPORT—1856. Lower Division. Middle Lias. Upper Lias. seeeeeeleselene KERR KE | Inferior Oolite. | Fuller’s Earth. . . * 3 Bell o als 3| 7|O Gls e| s|o n x: | Bradford Clay. | Forest Marble. Cornbrash. Oolitic Group. Middle Division. | Upper Division. : = S| - |e oe |e "fe & so =; Selo] ~|5| 5 | B leg Sig ||| Veo | lee a | heres MS|s| s | 5| |] 21O8 mo le| * |'s| S| slot SEO] g lol & | CS er Ws = a) Sh SHis| 6 |s| oa lbecs ZO|E| O Ey g o|5%3 Moya ily <0 eae ba * OOLITIC ECHINODERMATA. 403 Oolitic Group. Lower Division. Middle Division. | Upper Division. Ape 1 ee 4 | #/2/ 3, Upper Calcareous Grit...... Pay Kimmeridge Clay........ . 4 3 Portland’ Sandis.):ep.biaetaa * Ok - Marine Purbecks...... oS Sb se ibe ter The Lias species appear to be special to the three subdivisions of that for- mation, so well characterized by the species of Ammonites which indicate these three zones of Liassic life. The Inferior Oolite contains forty-three spe- cies, of which forty are EcHINorpEA, one ASTEROIDEA, and two are CrI- NOIDEA ; of these, ten species extend into the Great Oolite, and seven species pass into the Cornbrash; the Inferior Oolite has therefore twenty-six species which up to this time have not been found in any other formation, and all the species from the Lias to the Cornbrash included became extinct before the deposition of the Kelloway rock and Oxford clay. The Fuller’s earth has yielded no remains of Echinoderms ; the Stonesfield slate contains six species, most of which are special to this fissile oolitic rock. The Great Oolite has yielded twenty-six species, of which nine extend into the Cornbrash, but seven- teen are special to the Great Oolite stage. The eight species of the Bradford clay are mostly common to this argillaceous bed, and the Great Oolite lime- stone on which it rests. The Forest Marble contains seven species, of which four are common to this rock and the Cornbrash, which contains seventeen species, most of which are found in the older formations ; with the deposition of the Cornbrash the lower division of the Oolites terminate, and with it all the species of Echinodermata found in these rocks became extinct. The middle division of the Oolites contains far fewer species than the lower. The Kelloway rock and Oxford clay, so rich in Cephalopoda, have not in England, as faras 1 can learn, yielded any remains of Echinodermata. The Lower Calcareous grit, the Coral rag, and Upper Calcareous grit, have several species in common ; of the nine species of the Lower Calcareous grit, five are common to it and the Coral rag, which contains twenty species ; but I have not ascertained how many, if any, pass into the Upper Calcareous grit; in fact these three stages in reality represent only one stratigraphical zone of life. The Kimmeridge clay up to the present time is known to contain only four species, which are all special to it. There is one species only in the Portland sand, and one in the Marine Purbeck beds. The Portland Oolitic limestone is said to contain the remains of Echinoderms, but I have not been able to obtain any of the specimens for examination. TENSILE STRENGTH OF BOILER PLATE. 405 On the Tensile Strength of Wrought Iron at various Temperatures. By Wixiu1am Farreairn, F.R.S. &e. On a previous occasion I had the honour of conducting, for the Association, a series of experiments to determine the effects of temperature on the strength of castiron. In that inquiry I endeavoured to show to what extent the cohesion of that material was affected by change of temperature, and taking into account the rapidity with which iron imbibes caloric, and the facility with which it parts with it, it is equally interesting to know to what extent wrought iron is improved or deteriorated by similar changes. In the present inquiry, as in the former on cast iron, the expansion of the metal by heat is not the question for solution. Rondelet, Smeaton and others have already investigated that subject, and it now only remains for us to deter- mine the effects produced on the strength of malleable iron by changes of temperature, varying from —30° of Fahrenheit to a red heat, perceptible in daylight. The immense number of purposes to which iron is applied, and the changes ‘of temperature to which it is exposed, render the present inquiry not only interesting, but absolutely essential to a knowledge of its security under the varied influences of those changes; and when it is known that most of our iron constructions are exposed to a range of temperature varying from the extreme cold of winter to the intense heat of summer, it is assuredly desirable to ascertain the effects produced by these causes on a material from which we derive so many advantages, and on the security of which the safety of the public not unfrequently depends. Independent of atmospheric influences, another consideration presents itself in reference to the durability and ultimate stability of iron under changes much greater than those alluded to above, and this is the strength of such vessels as pans and boilers subjected to the extreme temperatures of boiling liquids on one side, and the intense heat of a furnace on the other. But even these extremes, however great, do not seem seriously to affect the cohesive strength of wrought-iron plates, nor do they appear to cause any disruption of the laminated structure which results from the system of piling and rolling adopted in the manufacture, excepting only where small particles of scoria happen to intervene between the laminated surfaces. These not unfrequently prevent a perfect welding, as the plate is compressed by passing through the rolls, and the effects of temperature are strikingly exhibited in the production of large blisters upon the surface of the plate, as shown in the annexed sketch at a,a. Now the reason of this is 5 Fig. 1. the want of solidity and homo- Bbivo i 2] geneity in the plate, and the con- eT ae sequent expansion of the lower part exposed to the greatest heat. Let us suppose, for the sake of illustra- tion, the plate to be 2ths of an inch thick, and the surface 6 to be the inte- ‘rior of a boiler-plate, and the surface a, a to be exposed to the action of the fire in the furnace. In this case it is evident that the temperature of the side a, a may be upwards of 1000°, while that of 6 is very little above 212°, or the temperature of boiling water ; and supposing there be any imperfection or ‘want of soundness in the plate, the result will be a greater expansion on the exterior surface, causing it to rise up in blisters in the manner we have de- 406 REPORT—1856. scribed. These defects are invariably present when the plates are not sound ; but in other respects, where the bars which form the pile are clear and free from rust or scoria, and are well-welded in the rolling process, the wide dif- ference between the temperature of one side and that of the other produces, apparently, no injurious effect on the strength of the plate. It is, however, widely different when the whole of the plates are exposed to the same de- gree of temperature, as in this position the strengths are increased or dimi- nished according as the temperature approaches or recedes from the point where the strength is a maximum. In order to show how the results were obtained, it will be necessary to describe the apparatus and the mode of conducting the experiments. The apparatus consisted of a powerful wrought-iron lever, Plate IV. A, figs. 2 and 3, capable of imparting a force of more than 100,000 lbs., or 45 tons per square inch to the specimen to be broken. The lever is supported in a cast-iron standard or frame B, arranged for the reception of specimens of the material to be subjected to a crushing force or tensile strain. On the short arm of the lever the plates and bars (one of which is seen at a) were suspended by a shackle ce, and held down to the bottom of the cast-iron standard by the rod and screw e; on this rod the box, 6, was fixed, and pre- pared to hold a bath of oil or water, in which the iron to be broken was immersed. Below this box was a fire-grate, d, for heating the liquid in the bath to the required temperature, and this grate could be drawn backwards from the box 6, when the required temperature was attained or when it be- came too high. The fulcrum of the lever is shown at f, and the scale in which the weights were placed at g. The cast-iron standard was firmly bolted to the heavy balks of timber upon which it stands, and the pressure on the specimen was adjusted by placing weights in the scale. The plates experimented upon were of the form shown in fig. 4, reduced at a, to 24 inches wide, and at b to 2 inches wide, in order to secure frac- ture at the part of the plate immersed in the liquid in the bath. At each end two holes are drilled to receive the bolt which fixed them in the shackles. The wrought-iron _ bars were formed in a similar manner. They were 7 inch in diameter, reduced to 2 of an inch at a, and to, | Fig. 4. ” t _’ ‘ eo tt . ' inch, or 3 inch at b. The ersalblt = alsa ase —4—I shackles were made to clasp a the bars below the shoul- ; ders so as to apply the strain Fig. 5. requisite to cause fracture. It is evident that the weak- est part of the bars being within the bath, breakage Se ge ae CL Sa ae ers oe a EC was sure to occur at that point where the temperature was raised or lowered to the required degree. With these preparations, the experiments proceeded as follows :—the bar to be broken was fixed between the shackles of the lever; and, if necessary, the bath was filled, and the fire drawn close under it; as soon as the intended temperature was attained, the lever was let down by the crab, and weights carefully added to the scale until the bar broke. During the process the temperature was observed from time to time, and the fire adjusted accord- ae —————eEe rT t—“‘“‘CO:COC~C TENSILE STRENGTH OF BOILER PLATE. 407 ingly, and the temperature registered in the Tables was observed imme- diately after the bar had given way. Experiments to ascertain the Influence of Temperature on the Tensile Strength of Boiler Plate. TaBLE I,—Strain applied in the direction of the fibre. Boiler plate; sectional area =2°02 x *34="6868 sq. in. Tempera-| No. of Strain Elongation Breaking weight ture, - i +s i Remarks. Sabr,, fj soeaten, | dente, «| | ; 0° 1 18,540 For figures of the specimens ex- 2 26,940 perimented on, see Plate V.,the 3 27,780 numbering of the figures cor- 4 28,620 responding with that of the 5 29,460 tables. 6 30,300 7 31,140 Broke with a clear ringing noise, 8 31,980 almost like cast iron. 9 32,820 10 33,660 | °14 49,009 =21°879 tons. The temperature in this experiment was reduced to zero by a mixture of pounded ice and salt, carefully placed round the plate in order to secure the same temperature in the metal as in the bath. Taste IJ.—Strain applied across the fibre. Boiler plate; sectional area=2°5 x ‘313=°7825 sq. in. 60° 1 8,190 2 10,140 3 16,860 4 23,580 5 30,300 6 31,980 162 40,357 = 18-001 tons. The experiments in the above and No. III. Table were conducted at the temperature of the atmosphere. Both specimens indicated a hard brittle iron, the interior laminations having somewhat the appearance of cast iron, with a fracture widely different from that exhibited when torn asunder in the direction of the fibre. Taste III.—Strain applied across the fibre. Boiler plate ; sectional area =2°0 x *32='64 sq. in. 60° 1 10,140 (1680 lbs. wasadded Some steely spots in fracture. at a time tillweight 10 25,260 11 26,100 in 12 26,940 “> 13 27,780 ‘1 43,406 =19-377 tons. | —— ee eeeEeeEeEeSESFSFSFSFSSFSSeSeseseeeeee 408 REPORT—1856. Tas.eE IV.—Strain applied in the direction of the fibre. Boiler plate ; sectional area =1:99 x °32=°6368 sq. in. Tempera-| No. of Strain | Flongation Breaking weight - = r . abs. | ruamte, | Seth.) | Smebes. | Pot GS ee ke es 60° 1 10,140 2 18,540 3 20,220 4 21,900 5 23,580 A fissure containing cinder ex- 6 25,260 tended one-third of the breadth’ 7 26,100 of the plate. In some parts 8 26,940 the blade of a penknife could: 9 27,780 be introduced. 10 28,620 Il 29,460 12 30,300 13 31,140 14 31,980 | -2 50,219 = 22-414 tons. In some former experiments on the tensile strength of wrought-iron plates*, the strength of the specimens was rather more uniform, and there appeared to be no difference between the strength of the plates when torn asunder in the direction of the fibre, and the strength when the strain was applied across it. Comparing Tables II. and III. with IV., we find the breaking weight in the direction of the fibre is to that across it as 22°41:18°67, or as 5:4 nearly; but it is possible that this arises from inequality in the rolling of the two specimens. Tasie V.—Strain applied across the fibre. Boiler plate; sectional area =1°99 x *33 sq. inch. 110° 1 25,260 2 26,940 Fracture very uneven. 3 27,780 4 28,620 5 29,460 13 44,160 =19-714 tons. The last weight was hardly on: 29,000 lbs. was probably nearer the breaking weight. TasLe VI.—Strain applied in the direction of the fibre. Boiler plate; sectional area =2:0 x *34=°68 sq. inch. 112° 18,540 20,220 21,900 23,580 25,260 26,940 28,620 42,088 |=18-789 tons. STS Ot Go bo = ee Transactions for 1850, p. 677, the results of which are also quoted at page 340. TENSILE STRENGTH OF BOILER PLATE. 409 Tasxre VII.—Strain applied in the direction of the fibre. Boiler plate; sectional area =2'54 x *32=°8128 sq. inch. Tempera- | No. of Strain ion|Breaking weight ture, experi- applied peo per hanate inch Remarks. 1m ids. Fahr. ments. in lbs. 1 25,260 2 26,940 3 28,620 4 30,300 5 31,140 6 7 8 9 31,980 32,400 33,660 34,500 10 | 35,340 11 35,760 12 | 36,180 13 | 36,600 14. | 37,020 173 40,625 |=18-136 tons. The last three experiments, at a mean temperature of 114°, indicate a near approach to uniformity of strength, that broken across the fibre being the strongest; the very reverse of those fractured at 60°, the numbers being as 197 : 184, or as 44:41 nearly, showing a loss of about ‘007 per cent. It is difficult to account for these changes and defects in the strengths of the plates, as most of the specimens were cut from one plate, and all of them were of the same manufacture. TasLe VIII.—Strain applied in the direction of the fibre. Boiler plate ; sectional area =2°6 x 3088008 sq. inch. 212° 1 | 30,300 15 2 31,980 39,935 be 17-828 tons. Broken in boiling water. This specimen did not break at the narrowest part of its section, which shows a serious defect in the plate. Tasie IX.—Strain applied across the fibre. Boiler plate; sectional area =2:01 x ‘33 ="6633 sq. inch. 212° 18,540 20,220 21,900 23,580 25,260 26,940 27,780 28,620 29,460 30,300 | +11 _ 45,680 |=20-392 tons. Broken in boiling water. ee ii, i eee SENOS Ode —_ _ In Table VIIL, where the specimen was drawn in the direction of the fibre, there appears to be some defect in the plate, as it gave way, not at the smallest section, but at a wider part of the plate, with a force of only 410 REPORT—1856. 39,935 lbs. to the square inch, whereas the same plate torn asunder across the fibre sustained a force of 45,680 lbs. before breaking. This difference of strength can only be accounted for by some defect not perceptible when the fracture was examined. The difference of strength, at the temperature of boiling water, indicated by these two specimens, is as 178 : 203, or in the ratio of 87:1. TasLe X.—Strain applied in the direction of the fibre. Boiler plate; sectional area =2°0 x °34='68 sq. inch. Tempera-| No. of Strain ion |Breaking weight ture, experi- applied oe per sauaee aN Remarks. Fahr. ments. in Ibs. in lbs. 212° 1 18,540 Broken in boiling water. 2 20,220 3 21,900 4 23,580 5 25,260 6 26,940 7 27,780 8 28,620 9 29,460 10 30,300 11 31,140 12 31,980 13 | 32,820 14 | 33,660| -22 49,500 |=22-098 tons. Comparing -this plate with that in experiment VIII., it will be seen that the power of resistance of the former is more than one-fifth greater than that of the latter, showing that there must have been some defect in the longer section of the specimen, or fracture would not have ensued at so early a period of the experiment. We cannot abandon this experiment, as no defect presented itself, if we except the highly crystallized state of the fracture, both specimens having been drawn asunder in the direction of the fibre. In these experiments it will be observed that the infusion of heat into wrought- iron plates, from zero to 212°, does not injure, but rather improves, their tensile strength. TaBLeE XI.—Strain applied in the direction of the fibre. Boiler plate; sectional area =2°01 x ‘'32=°6432 sq. inch. 270° 1 18,540 Broken in hot oil. 2 20,220 3 21,900 4 23,580 Broke before the last weight was 5 |2 25,260 fairly on; 28,320 lbs. probably 6 26,940 nearer. 7 27,780 8 28,620 13 44,020 |=19°651 tons. From this experiment it appears that an increase of 58° of heat makes no perceptible difference in the strength of the plate. If we take the mean of the two previous experiments, in the direction of the fibre, it will be found there is no great difference between them, the mean of Tables VIII. and X. being 44,708, and Table XI. giving 44,020 lbs. to the square inch. eee TENSILE STRENGTH OF BOILER PLATE. 411 Tas_Le XIJ.—Strain applied in the direction of the fibre. Boiler plate; sectional area =2:0 x *32=64 sq. inch. Tempera- | No. of Strain Elongation Breaking weight ture, experi- applied | in inches, | Pet Square inch Remarks, Fahr. ments. in lbs. in Ibs. te eee 340° 25,260 26,940 28,620 29,460 30,300 31,140 31,980 | ‘1 49,968 | =22-307 tons. ST SD St OO bD In this experiment the plate gave way at the shackle, the bolt which held the plate tearing through the eye, and forcing away a four-sided piece as the plate was about to yield to the weight on the lever. We may therefore safely assume 31,980 or 32,000 lbs. as the ultimate strength or breaking weight of the plate. Tas LE XIJI.—Strain applied across tlie fibre. Boiler plate; sectional area =2:0 x°34=°68 sq. inch. 340° 18,540 Broken in hot oil. 20,220 21,900 23,580 25,260 26,940 27,780 ; 28,620 | °15 42,088 |=18789 tons. CONT OS) Ot RR OO DO The mean result of experiments XII. and XIII. is 46,014 lbs., or about 203 tons per square inch, evidently showing that the iron is in no degree injured by a temperature ranging from zero up to 340°, and this temperature may probably be increased as high as 500° or 600° without seriously impairing the strength, as may be seen in the following Table at nearly 400°. TasLe XIV.—Strain applied in the direction of the fibre. Boiler plate; sectional area =2:02 x ‘33="6666 sq. inch. 395° 1 18,540 Broken in hot oil. 2 | 20,220 3 21,900 4 | 23,580 5 24,420 6 25,260 7 26,100 8 | 26,940 9 27,780 10 | 28,620 11 29,460 12 30,300 13 30,720 18 46,086 = 20°574 tons, The only difference between this and the last two experiments is the “increased elongation, which in the latter was 1:25, and in the former °18 412 REPORT—1856. inches. However, the elongation of these short specimens cannot always be depended on, as there is considerable difficulty in ascertaining them accu- rately. TasLE XV.—Strain applied across the fibre. Boiler plate; sectional area =2°0 x ‘31="62 sq. inch. Tempera- No. of Strain |Plongation |Breaking weight ture, Fahr. experi- applie in inches. | Pet Square inch Remarks. ; ments. in lbs. in lbs. — 8,190 10,140 11,820 13,500 15,180 16,860 18,540 20,220 21,900 23,520} 15 38,032 |=16-978 tons. A scarcely perceptible red heat. SOON Orie Oo bo _ The plate in this experiment was heated until it became perceptibly lumi- nous in the shade; it was then loaded, as before, until fracture ensued. In this experiment it will be observed that a considerable diminution of strength took place in consequence of the increased temperature, clearly showing that above a certain point the tensile strength of wrought iron is seriously injured. This fact is more strikingly apparent in the next experiment, in which the temperature was raised to a dull red heat, just perceptible in daylight. TABLE XVI. In this experiment a plate of the same description as the last was raised to a dull red heat, when the weight of the lever was allowed to strain the specimen with a force of 18,540 lbs., and fracture immediately ensued. The elongation was *23. Sectional area of boiler plate=1*96 x *31=*6076 sq. inch. Strain applied across the fibre. Breaking weight per square inch =30,513 lbs.=13°621 tons. This experiment is quite conclusive as to the effects produced on wrought iron whenever it approaches a red heat. At that temperature nearly one- half its strength is lost; it becomes exceedingly ductile, and is drawn con- siderably in the direction of the strain before its cohesive powers are destroyed. The greatly increased ductility of wrought-iron plates, at a dull red heat, is strikingly exemplified in the flues of boilers, whenever the water gets low, or recedes below the surface of the plates, and that more particularly if the plates are immediately over the fire; in such a position the flues readily collapse with a comparatively low pressure. In the bending of a plate, when red hot, a very small force is required ; but within limits of temperature not exceed- ing 400°, it requires nearly the same force to produce collapse as it would at any temperature above 32°, or the freezing-point of water*. * We hope in a short time to give a series of experiments on the resistance of wrought- iron plates and bars to a transverse and compressive force at various temperatures. TENSILE STRENGTH OF BOILER PLATE, 413 Collecting the results of these experiments, tabulated above, it will be necessary to exhibit them in a more condensed form, so as to facilitate com- parison, and to deduce the laws which regulate the tensile strength of wrought iron. We may then apply the results of these experiments to a much greater variety of plates produced in the different districts of England. It will be borne in mind that the ordinary Staffordshire plates, such as those experi- mented upon (unless they are double-worked), are rather inferior in quality to the Shropshire and Derbyshire plates, and much more so to those manu- factured at the Lowmoor and Bowling Works. Hence the comparison will only hold good between the Staffordshire plates in each case. General Summary of Results. No. of Tempera- Breging Breaking wrsht Breaking bgt Mean breaking wartas of : eri- wei r square er square inch | wei; er square| strain in regar pe aly tare, Faby. in Tbs BF i) Ibs. bd Oy i aera. chin Ihe. to fibree r 0 33,660 | 49,009 21°879 49,009 With. TI. 60 31,980 40,357 18°00] Across. II. 60 27,780 43,406 19°377 44,498 Across*. TV. 60 31,980 50,219 22:414 With. Vv. 110 29,460 44,160 19°714 Across {. VI. 112 28,620 42,088 18-789 } 42,291 With. VII. 120 37,020 40,625 18°136 With. VII. 212 31,980 | 39,935 17:828 With. IX, 212 30,300 45,680 20°392 45,005 Across, X. 212 33,660 49,500 22:098 With. XI. 270 28,620 44,020 19°651 44,020 With. XII. 340 31,980 49,968 22°307 46.018 With||, XIII. 340 28,620 42,088 18°789 } ‘ Across. XIV. 395 380,720 46,086 20°574 46,086 With. XV, |Scarcely red} 23,520 38,082 16:978 34.272 Across. XVI. |Dull red 18,540 30,513 13°621 } , Across J. From the above Table we may deduce the following :— Drawn asunder in the direction of the fibre. Drawn asunder across the fibre. ‘Tempera- : . ture, Breaking weight Breaking weight Breaking weight | Breaking weight | Fahr. per square inch per square inch per square inch per square inch in lbs. in tons. in Ibs. in tons. i) 49,009 21-879 60 50,219 22-4147 41,881 18-689 * 114 41,356 18°462 44,160 19:714t 212 44,717 19:963§ 45,680 20:392 270 44,020 19°651 340 49,968 22307 || 42,088 18-789 395 46,086 20°574 Red. 34,272 15-2999 ‘ * Some steely spots in fracture. = Too high, fracture very uneven, || Too low, tore through eye. + Fissure containing scoria. § Did not break at smallest section. { Too high, see Table. 414 REPORT—1856. From the experimental inquiry into the strength of wrought-iron plates, as applied to ship-building, we have the following results* :— Mean breaking weight, in the direction of the fibre, in tons per square inch. Mean breaking weight, across the fibre, in tons per square inch. od Yorkshire plates.......cssscesesecsescecees 25°770 27-490 Yorkshire plates....... 22-760 26:037 Derbyshire plates 21:680 18:650 Shropshire plates 22°826 22-000 Staffordshire plates .......s:eeseseseese 19-563 21:010 Meant! Sevsvesercss cones 22-519 23-037 Now if we compare the ultimate strength of the Staffordshire plates in the above Table with those since experimented upon, we shall have, taking those in which the strain was applied in the direction of the fibre, for the former 19°563 tons per square inch, and for a mean of nine experiments of the latter, ranging in temperature from zero to 395°, 20°408 tons per square inch. Taking those torn asunder across the fibre, we have for Staffordshire plates in the above Table 21-010, and for those since experimented on 19°254 tons+ per square inch, which on comparison give the following ratios of re- sults :— Staffordshire plates, torn in the direction of the fibre, at a mean tempera- ture of 191°=20°408 tons, and those (in the above Table) at the tempera- ture of the atmosphere, or about 60°=19°563 tons, or in the ratio of 1°:*96 nearly, a remarkable coincidence in tensile strength in the two series of experiments. Those torn across the fibre, at a mean temperature of 156°, gave a tensile strength =19°254 tons ; those at the temperature of atmosphere 60°, as shown in the previous experiments =21:010 tons, or in the ratio of 1: 1-091. The above results indicate great uniformity in the ultimate strength of Staffordshire plates, which may safely be taken at 20 tons per square inch at all temperatures, between the extremes of zero and 400° Fahr., that is, under a dead weight calculated to destroy the cohesive powers of the material. To what extent these plates would resist impact, at various degrees of tempera- ture, we have yet to determine; but assuming that iron is more liable to frac- ture from an impactive force at a very low temperature ; it will be safer to calculate on a reduction of their resisting powers, at the lower temperatures under 32° Fahr., or the freezing-point of water. These experiments might be multiplied to a great extent, in order to de- termine the strength of plates under the varied conditions of temperature in regard to compression, extension, and the force of impact; but we have already shown in former experiments, and those now recorded above, that iron is not seriously affected by those changes, and we trust the foregoing results will prove sufficient to enable the practical engineer to calculate the resisting powers of iron plates, under all the changes of temperature, from zero up to a red heat. * Philosophical Transactions, Part II. 1850, p. 677. + The mean temperature of nine, broken in the direction of the fibre, is 191°; and the mean temperature of five, broken across the fibre, excluding red heat, is 156°. "2 ie @e@ey eles) —r Cr 4 2 ) Ps +4 TENSILE STRENGTH OF RIVET IRON. Ald Experiments on the Tensile Strength of Rivet Iron. At the time when the preceding experiments were instituted, it was con- sidered expedient to make them on plates of ordinary quality, and of the de- scription in general use. For this purpose Staffordshire plates were selected, as being of medium quality, such as are employed in the construction of boilers, ship-building, &c. Plates of a higher character, such as the Lowmoor and double-worked qualities, might have been selected ; but those most in demand, and which are manufactured in large quantities, were considered more de- sirable, although it left untouched a question of some importance in regard to the influence of heat upon the finer qualities, generally known as “ serap” and “ fagotted” iron. This description of iron is forged from old iron serap, and rolled into bars for bolts and rivets. It is a fine ductile iron of great tenacity, and works freely under the hammer; and it was determined to apply to it the same experimental tests as had been applied to the Staffordshire lates. : From the results of these experiments, it will be seen that they indicate precisely the same law as was found to influence the Staffordshire plates, the maximum strength being at a temperature of 325°, rather higher than that indicated by the plates. This is irrespective of the superior strength of the bar iron as compared with that of the plates. Having prepared the lever, as before, a long bar, iths of an inch in diameter, was selected and cut into lengths, which were then reduced to the form shown in the annexed sketch, | with shoulders to receive the shackle. The specimens, when immersed in the bath, were drawn asunder by the same process as that described for the plates. Experiments to ascertain the Influence of Temperature on the Tensile Strength of Rivet Iron. TasLeE XVII.—Area of section =:24850. Tempera-| No.of | Strain Elongation Breaking weight -- Sei yi Geel i oa. —30° 1 9,205 Broken in a mixture of pounded 2 9,415 ice and crystallized chloride of 3 11,648 calcium. 4 10,045 Figures of some of the fractured KK specimens will be found in 58 15,610 Pl. IV. fig. 1, numbered to cor- respond with the tables. 59 15,715 “80 63,239 |=28-231 tons. From the above it will be observed that the strength of the best quality of bar iron greatly exceeds that of the plates, being in this experiment two- fifths more, and in some experiments, at higher temperatures, nearly double _ that of the Staffordshire plates. 416. REPORT—1856. 1 TaBLe XVIII.—Sectional area =°24850. Tempera-| No, of Strain Elongation Breaking weight ture, experi- applied | 5, inches, | Pet square inch Remarks. in Fahr. ments. in lbs. +60° 1 | 12,565 2 lbs. — 13,405 3 13,812 A large bright spot, like steel, in 4 14,035 fracture. OK OK 16 15,295 7 15,400 82 61,971 = 27°665 tons. There is a slight diminution in the strength of this bar as compared with the previous experiment at —30°, but the discrepancy is scarcely appreciable, and may easily be accounted for by inequalities in the forging or rolling of the bar. Tasie XIX.—Sectional area =*24.850. 1 2 3 12,565 Drew out at shoulder. 4 12,985 2K kk 30 15,715 31 15,820 “56 63,661 | =28-419 tons. The strength of the bar in this experiment is a trifle in excess of those fractured at —30° and 60°. It would have been rather stronger had it been rounded at the shoulder to prevent its pulling out there, as shown in the figure. However, there is little difference in the strength of the material through a range of 90° of temperature. TaBLE XX.—Sectional area =*24:850. 10,885 Pulled out at shoulder. After 12,565 between 13,000 and 14,000 Ibs. 13,405 had been laid on, only 105 lbs. 13,615 were added at a time, as it gave * hohe more correct indications of the 17,500 strength as the bars approached fracture. . 17,605 D6 70,845 =31-627 tons. It has already been observed that the whole of the specimens for experi- _ ment were cut from one bar, and as each experiment was conducted with great care, both in preparing the specimens and laying on the weights, we are bound by the results to believe that the increased strength of this de- scription of iron is due entirely to the increase of temperature. In this ex- periment, it will be seen that the resisting power of the bar ruptured at 114° was to that of the bar ruptured at 60° (Table XIX.) as 1 : °898. TENSILE STRENGTH OF RIVET IRON. 417 Taste XX1.—Sectional area =24.850. Tempera- | No. of Strai ion |Breaking weight aes experi- apened ea ru Fea .: a Remarks, Fahr. ments, in Ibs. in lbs, 212° le 12,565 | 2 12,985 3 13,405 4 13,825 | 5 14,245 | eRe | | 76 | 21,805 | At this point it was discovered | | that the bar was cutting into | the shackle; the experiment was 1 12,565 | therefore discontinued till a 2 12,985 new shackle could be prepared, 3 13,405 | and it was then repeated. 4 13,825 KKK | 56 19,285 "64 —_—_—,:,|_——— | ——. | rs es Mean ......| 20,545 82,676 =36-900 tons. ee ee a ee tT tyne aid gin This bar tore into the shackle, so that the strain was not thrown properly on it; the experiment was therefore discontinued, and another shackle sub- stituted with the bearing-edges steeled. When the same bar was tried again, having been injured in the previous experiment, it broke with 19,285 lbs. Under these circumstances, we have taken the mean of the two experiments 21,805 + 19,285 2 =20,545 as the breaking weight, as recorded in the Table. TaBLe XXII.—Sectional area =+19635. nes Seer HU GLE. SUG RE thar Leia { ai | 1 | 19,565 | a) 13,405 | Bar defective: a large longitudinal | | 3 | 14,245 | fissure, filled with scoria. | 4 | 14,350 | 5 | 14455 | 6 | 14,560) -47 | 74,153 | =33-104 tons. There is a progressive increase in the strength of the bars as the temperature ascends, Table XX. exhibiting an increase of 11,831 Ibs., and Table XXII. an increase of 3,308 lbs. over the breaking weight at 114°. Taking the _ mean of the two last experiments, we have an increase of 7,569 lbs. over the 7 OSS." breaking weight in experiment XX. TABLE XXIII.—Sectional area =-24850. 14,245 | 15,925 | 16,135 | 16,345 | KKK | 20,020 | 20,125 | -66 80,985 |—36-154 tons. 3 40 This experiment being at the same temperature as the two last, viz. 212°, it 6. 2E 418 REPORT—1856. will be proper to take the mean of the last three Tables as the breaking 82,676 + 74,153 + 80,985 weight at that temperature, =79,271|bs. per square inch=ultimate breaking weight at 212°. TaBLE XXIV.—Sectional area =*19635. + Tempera- | No. of Strain Elongation Breaking weight ture, experi- applied | jn inches. | Pet Square inch Remarks. Fahr. ments. in Ibs. in lbs. 250° 1 10,045 2 | 10,885 3 | 11,725 3K OR Kk 43 | 15,925 44 16,135 ‘6 82,174 |=36°684 tons. Here again, in the above experiment, is a perceptible increase of strength, as the temperature rises 38°, from 79,271 to 82,174 ]bs. per square inch, and so in the next Table, where the increase is still greater. TasLe XXV.—Sectional area =*24850. 12,565 13,405 14,245 15,085 15,400 15,925 16,345 2K OK KOK 20,545 20,650 | -74 86,056 | =88-417 tons, ams NOOR COD tae’ The increase of 20° of temperature in this experiment gives a correspond- ing increase of strength of 3882 Ibs. per square inch, something more than the increase exhibited in the previous experiment. There is, however, a remarkable coincidence in the ratio of the strengths as they rise with the increase of temperature, the only exceptions being those of Tables I. and XXII, but in both cases the anomaly is sufficiently explained by the state of the fracture. TABLE XXVI.—Sectional area =:19635. | 12,565 14,245 15,085 15,295 310° | i | 15,715 1 2 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 15,820 | 63 80,570 | =35:968 tons. In this experiment it will be observed that there is a falling offin tenacity with the increase of temperature from 86,056 to 80,570 lbs. per square inch. It is difficult to account for this discrepancy, as the fracture in this, as in the previous and succeeding experiments, appeared sound and free from flaws of any description, > ; TENSILE STRENGTH OF RIVET IRON. 419 TasBLE XXVII.—Sectional area =:19635. Tempera- | No. of Strain Elongation Breaking weight Fahe. | tabots, | ehpet | iminches. | Per sgusre inch aid ak 325° 1 10,045 2 | 10,885 3 | 11,725 * KKK 53 | 17,080 54 | 17,185 6 87,522 |=39-072 tons. The above bar, although of the same quality and appearance as that in the previous experiment, gives no less than 6952 lbs., upwards of three tons, greater tenacity than its predecessor. The former appeared equally tough and fibrous in the fracture, and the elongation in the same distance was rather more than in the latter, and yet it is about one-twelfth weaker. TasLe XXVIII.—Sectional area =:24850. 415° 1 12,565 2 14,245 3 15,085 4 15,925 5 16,765 * KKK 8 9 20,230 20,335 64 81,830. |=36-531 tons. In this experiment there is a decrease in the strength with an increase of temperature of 90°, but in the next experiment, with a further increase of 20°, the strength again rises from 81,830 to 86,056, or nearly two tons, _ which shows that the increase of 100° of temperature has not seriously affected the molecular constitution of the iron. This irregularity, after so constant an increase of strength, indicates that we have about reached the _ Maximum strength of the material. We shall see hereafter that the increase _ of strength from —30° to 325° has been four-tenths, nearly one-half. Taste XX1X.—Sectional area =*24.850. 435° 12,565 13,405 13,812 14,035 14,245 14,665 15,085 * +X 21,280 . 21,385 744 86,056 |=388-415 tons. Aor NO) St > GO Oe [=rB=r) The difference between this and the last experiment is about one-eighteenth, part of the former in favour of the latter. This difference we cannot account ‘or by an examination of the fractures; but taking the mean of the two, and _ comparing it with Table XXVILI., it appears that we have passed the maxi- ‘mum strength, and recede from it in the ratio of 87,522 : 83,943, or as 1 :°959. Ef 2E2 420 REPORT—1856. TasLe XXX.—Sectional area ='24850. Temperature raised to red heat, visible by daylight. Broke with the weight of the lever =8,965 lbs. Elongation ='55. Breaking weight per square inch =36,076 lbs. =16°105 tons. In this experiment, as in those on the plates, the tenacity of the iron is seriously injured before the temperature reaches dull red heat ; and when that point is attained, it has lost more than one-half its powers of resistance to strain. At this high temperature it becomes exceedingly ductile and weak when subjected to any description of force, inasmuch as it becomes so pliable that it is immaterial whether the strain applied is compressive, tensile or torsional. Under any of these forces it is not to be depended upon at a temperature bordering upon redness. Collecting the results of the foregoing experiments in their consecutive order into a Table, we see that the maximum strength of bars appears to be attained at a mean temperature of about 320°. This is above the tempera- ture at which the maximum strength of the plates was attained ; but it is to be remembered, that little or no change is observable in the strength of the plates, whilst that of the bars is increased nearly one-half. This fact is worthy of notice, inasmuch as in countries where the climate is hot and never descends below freezing, the best bar iron will retain a power of resistance equal to 29 tons upon the square inch, whereas in colder and more northerly districts it would not be safe to calculate upon more than 28 tons to the square inch. General Summary of Results. No. of Breaking | Elon- Breaking Breaking | Mean break- Temperature, experi- weight gation | weight per weight per | ing weight | Remarks | Fahr. ment, in Ibs. pein square inch | square inch | per square ay inches. in lbs. in tons. inch in Ibs. } | —30 XVII. 15,715 80 63,239 28-231 63,239 |Too low. +60 XVIII. 15,400 82 61,971 27°665 60 XIx.| 15;820 | -56 | 63,661 | 28-419 } 62,816 Too low. 114 XX. 17,605 ‘56 70,845 | 31-627 70,845 Too low. 212 XXI.| 20,545 “64 82,676 36°900 212 XXII. 14,560 “47 74,153 | 33°104 79,271 212 XXII. 20,125 “66 80,985 | 36:154 250 XXIV.| 16,135 : 6 82,174 36°684 82.636 270 XXV.| 20,650 | -74 | 83,098 38-417 } , 310 XXVI. 15,820 63 80,570 35°968 84.046 325 XXVII. 17,185 6 87,522 39-072 } : 415 | XXVIII. 20,335 64 81,8380 36531 83.943 435 XXIX.| 21,385 74 86,056 38-415 } : Red heat. XXX. 8,965 55 36,076 167105 35,000 Too high. In the above Table we perceive a steady improvement in the strength of the iron from 60° up to 325°, where the maximum appears to be attained. As already noticed, this improvement does not present itself in the inferior descriptions of irons, such as the plates tested in the preceding experiments. This may arise from the different processes pursued in the manufacture, the bars being rendered fibrous and ductile, in the first instance, under the hammer, and this is further improved by reheating them and passing them | between the rolls. Bar iron will thus be drawn by the hammer and rolls’ TENSILE STRENGTH OF RIVET IRON. 421. to from twenty to twenty-five times its original length ; whilst plates, such as we have selected, never come under the hammer, and seldom exceed six Bee times the length of the original shingle after passing through the Tolls. On comparing these results with those of a similar quality of iron, viz. S.C. & bar iron, experimented upon at Woolwich Dockyard, it will be found that a corresponding and progressive increase of strength is equally appa- rent as in the above experiments; that increase, however, arising from a different cause, namely, the repeated fracture of the bars as exhibited in the following Table :— First breakage. | Second breakage.| Third breakage. |Fourth breakage. ee eS ae Rao Eee ee [fet Spt ae co Reduced aoe Stretch Stretch Stretch Stretch ne Tons. in 54 Tons. | in 36 Tons. | in24 | Tons. | in 15 to inches. inches. inches. inches. in. in. in. in. A 33°75 9-125 | 35°5 2°00 C 33°75 9-250 | 35:25 25 | 87:00|1:00 | 38°75 1:25 E 32°5 9:250 | 34°75 | 1:25 F 33:25! 10500 | 35:50} 1:12 | 37:25} ‘62 40°40} ...... 1:18 G 32°75 8-500 | 35-00} 1:25 | 87°5 | ...... A041] ...... 1:25 H 33°75| 10°625 | 36:25| 1:87 I 33°50 8-375 | 34:50 “62 | 36°5 | 1:50 : J 33:50| 9-250 | 36:00! +25 | 36°75| 1-120 | 41°75] ...... 1:25 L 32-25 |Defective| 36°50) 1:5 37°75 | ...6. | 41:00} “31 1:25 M 30:25 |Defective| 36°50} .-62 37-:75| -06 | 38:50] -06 1:25 Mean ......... 32°92 | 0... 35°57 | .....- | 37°21) .....- 40°16] ...... 1:24 - Bo ien f) Po oe]. ce 25-86 | «0... 27-06 | .eeeee 29-20) ...... 90 square inch - From the above it will be seen that the mean strength of the bars was 24 tons, whilst that of the rivet iron was 28 tons per square inch, at a tem- perature of 60°, and that the former attained its maximum strength of 29 tons from repeated breakages, whilst the latter reached a strength of 37 tons by an increase of temperature up to 317°. These are curious and interesting facts, exhibiting a parallel increase of strength, in the one case resulting from repeated strains, in the other from increase of temperature. The foregoing Table indicates a progressive increase of strength, notwith- standing the reduced sectional area of the bars. This fact is of considerable importance, as it shows that a severe tensile strain is not injurious to the bearing powers of wrought iron, even when repeated to the extent of four times. In practice, it may not be prudent to test bars and chains to their utmost limit of resistance ; ,it is however satisfactory to know, that in cases of emergency those limits may be approached without incurring a serious risk of injury to the ultimate strength of the material. It is further important to observe, that the elongations are not in propor- tion to the forces of extension; thus in the bar F, the elongation of a bar, _ 54 inches long with 33-25 tons, is 10°5 inches, giving an elongation per unit of weight and length= SOP nEEX 0058, whereas an additional weight of 225 tons produces an elongation of 1°25 inches in 36 inches of length of 1°25 j bar, giving an elongation per unit of length and weight=a.5.~-9¢ ='0154; 25x36 _ that is, the elongation in this case is about three times that in the former. 422 REPORT—1856. From the experiments on rivet iron we have a mean elongation, in four- : ; : 643 : teen experiments, of °643 inches in 25 inches, or 5 = 257 per unit of length; and in those on the S. C. — bars, we have a mean elongation of 274, as given in the following Table :— . Elongation per Length of bar. Elongation. iiit oF leagth, 216 233 "244 ‘258 420 Hence it appears that the rate of elongation of bars of wrought iron in- creases with the decrease of their length; thus while a bar of 120 inches has an elongation of ‘216 inch per unit of its length, a bar of 10 inches has an elongation of 42 per unit of its length, or nearly double what it is in the former case. The relation between the length of the bar and its maximum elongation per unit, may be approximately expressed by the following formula, viz.— 25 i= 18+7> where L represents the length of the bar, and / the elongation per unit of length of the bar. It is difficult to measure accurately the elongations in 2} inches, but the following Table shows the elongation per unit of weight and length at various temperatures, as exhibited in the experiments on rivet iron. Temperature, | Elongation per | Mean elongation Fahr. ton per inch. per Bess . hcg —30 00284 00284 +60 ‘00297 : 60 00197 00247 114 00177 00177 | 212 00173 212 00142 00162 212 00182 250 ‘00164 : 270 O0tga } 00178 310 “00175 : 325 00153 } 00164 415 ‘00175 : 435 ae } 00183 Red heat. “00341 00341 The two first experiments, at low temperatures, are rather anomalous, but the rest are more consistent, showing that the elongation per unit of length and weight is nearly the same at all ordinary temperatures, but is more than doubled at red heat. MERCANTILE STHAM TRANSPORT ECONOMY. 423 ‘Mercantile Steam Transport Economy. By Cuaries ATHERTON, Chief Engineer of Her Majesty’s Dockyard, Woolwich. [A Communication directed to be printed entire among the Reports of the Association. ] THE construction of ships and the administration of shipping affairs, invol- ving a multiplicity of considerations of a scientific and of a practical and mercantile character connected with these arts, requires that shipping direc- tion be regarded and treated as the subject of an exclusive science; and, of late years, the progressively extended application of steam to maritime pur- poses, and the prospect of its general use as an auxiliary power, have still further complicated the subject, and extended the range of mercantile acquirement which is now necessary in the prosecution of steam-ship equip- ment, direction, and management. It is therefore with diffidence, and with the feeling of my not possessing the combination of qualifications which is necessary to ensure adequate justice being done in all respects to the eluci- dation of the important subject, ‘Steam Transport Economy,” that I enter upon the task of bringing that subject before the notice of the British Asso- ciation for the Promotion of Science. I am, however, encouraged by the assuring reflection that public utility is a field in which it is an honour to labour, that lenient consideration for individual deficiencies and the helping hand of others will be extended to the most humble delvers in that field, and that credit may be earned in proportion to the roughness and obdurate nature of the spot of ground which we may have undertaken to break up, and to the perseverance by which one may at least attempt the accomplishment of the assigned task. Permit me, therefore, to remark, that my present appeal to the British Association is but a continuation of my previous efforts in the cause of steam exposition, with a view to bringing “ Steam Transport Eco- nomy ” within the pale of arithmetical calculation ; and asI shall have occa- sion to refer to the enunciation of principles and to the details of calculations which have thus preceded this essay, it may be convenient that I briefly enumerate the various published statements thus referred to as forming an integral portion of this paper, and which, accordingly, I beg to hand in to the Association for the purposes of reference and record. Ist. A brief essay on ‘ Marine Engine Construction and Classification,’ published by Weale, in 1851. The object of this essay was to analyse the data afforded by published and authentic statements of the actual test-trial performances of various steam- ships, and ascertain, by means of such comparative analysis, what are the peculiarities or proportions of build, and what are the peculiarities of engine- construction of those vessels which have attained to the highest degrees of locomotive efficiency, thereby also scrutinising how far the popularly re- ceived notions in regard to steam-ship type and marine engine construction, supposed to be most conducive to locomotive efficiency, may be in accord- ance with, or in opposition to, the results of actual experience, when mea- sured by any definite and received law. 2nd. An essay on ‘Steam-ship Capability,’ originally published in 1853, and of which a second edition, with supplement, was published by Weale, in 1854. This essay was designed to demonstrate the mutual relations which subsist between displacement, power, and speed in steam-ships ; especially as respects the increasing scale of engine-power by which progressive increase of speed is attained; and to show the difficulties which attend the prosecution of a steam service in which long passages are required to be performed ata high 424 REPORT—1856. rate of speed; also to show the sacrifice which attends the employment of vessels of an inferior type of build, as compared with vessels of’ a superior type. The supplement published with the second edition of this essay ex- tended the tabular calculations to embrace vessels of hypothetical magni- tude, and to demonstrate a system of £ s. d. arithmetical calculation appli- cable to estimating the cost of goods conveyance per tun weight by steam- ships, based on the constructive type of the ship, the speed to be realized, and the size of ship employed to do the work. The appendix to this essay embraces a dissertation on the probable capabilities of ships of unprece- dented magnitude, showing the advantage of magnitude so far as mechanical principles are concerned irrespective of mercantile considerations, and under what combinations of speed and distance without re-coaling, comparatively with the more frequent coaling depots available to smaller vessels, the me- chanical advantage of magnitude becomes neutralized ; also giving new tables for facilitating steam-ship calculations, by showing the cubes of numbers from 5 to 25, rising by the decimal ‘01, and the cube-roots of the squares of all numbers likely to be embraced in the tonnage displacement of ships. 3rd. A paper on “ Steam-ship Capability,” read before the Society of Arts, London, 16th May, 1855. The object of this paper was to expose the indefinite nature of the terms «horse-power” and “tonnage” as respects their not being what they are generally supposed to be, definite units of measurement of engine-power and ships’ size ; also to show the uselessness for scientific purposes of all statistical data based on nominal horse-power and nominal tonnage, and the fallacy of all calculations based on those indefinite terms, thence showing the necessity for some definite measure of power being legalized as the unit of power to be denoted by the term “ Marine Horse-power,” and used as the base of calculation and contract engagement in steam shipping affairs. 4th. A paper on “ Tonnage Registration,” read before the Society of Arts, London, January 16, 1856, with the discussions thereon. The object of this paper was to show the insufficiency for scientific pur- poses of the system of tonnage registration now in force, as prescribed by the Merchant Shipping Bill of 1854, in so far that under this Act the registered tonnage of a ship affords no certain indication of the tons weight of cargo that the ship will carry, nor does it give, even approximately, the displacement with reference to any given draught; nor does the registration afford any indication of the power capable of being worked up to by the engines of steam-ships, or any other data whereby the dynamic properties or locomotive duty of vessels may be scrutinized on scientific principles. By this paper, I brought forward certain suggestions for public consideration and discussion with a view to our official registration of shipping being ren- dered more comprehensive for the fulfilment of the various useful purposes to which statistical registration, if complete, would undoubtedly conduce, in a scientific point of view, irrespectively of merely fiscal objects. These papers, of 16th May 1855, and 16th of January 1856, urging the establishment and recognition of definite units as the legal admeasurement of marine engine-power and ships’ tonnage, I beg respectfully to submit to the notice of the Committee appointed by this Association for the consideration of the tonnage question, of which Committee I had the honour of being named a member, but I was under the necessity of declining to take part on this Committee in consequence of my being, as above stated, committed to cer- tain views and publicly engaged in agitating the question of ‘Tonnage Regi- stration amendment, with a view to supplying the deficiencies of the present system. i MERCANTILE STEAM TRANSPORT ECONOMY. 4.25 _ Having thus shown that various investigations essentially connected with the elucidation of the subject now before us, “ Steam Transport Economy,” have constantly and publicly engaged my attention since 1851, I may now, in the beginning of my paper, announce the proposition to which I hope to direct the attention of the British Association. Now, what I have undertaken to demonstrate is this: that, in consequence of there being no legalized definitions of the terms PowER and TONNAGE as standard units of quantity applied to the prosecution of steam navigation, there is practically no definite measure of quantity whatever attached to those terms, even although they are so generally made use of as the base of pecuniary contracts, and that, in addition to the private evils as between buyer and seller resulting from this singular anomaly in matters of mercan- tile account: the public evils, resulting from nominal “horse-power” and “tonnage ” being terms which cannot be scientifically recognized as express- ing either the working power of marine machinery or the size of a ship, are monstrous, inasmuch as they publicly defeat science from being brought to _ bear on steam-ship construction and steam-ship management as a means of _ investigation and proof whereby to confirm the existence and establish the continued adoption of good practice where good practice does exist, and to detect error either in the construction of steamers or in the management of steamers in cases where bad types of construction and mal-administration may exist and be destructive of enterprise, which might otherwise have con- duced to public good. In short, my object is to show that in consequence of the deficiencies in our national standard units of power and tonnage, and deficiencies of our statistical registration, the public are deprived of the benefits capable of being derived from science as a means of discriminating between good and bad practice in the great matter of shipping, thus enabling us to take advantage of the one and explode the other. The constructive _ merits of steam-ships in a dynamic point of view may be comparatively de- _ termined by the ratio that subsists between the amount of displacement that is propelled from place to place, the speed or time in which the vessel per- forms the given passage, and the engine-power exerted or the coal consumed in the performance of the work; yet every ship that is launched, and goes with flying colours upon the usual test-trial, is always for the day pronounced to be the most wonderful ship that ever was built; and no wonder that it is so, considering that the dynamic merits of ships are thus determined, not by _ any admitted rule based on the mutual relations of displacement, power, and speed, but by acclamation based on the mutual interests of all concerned, | that a new ship shall be of good repute. All attempts to expose this mon- strous deficiency in our nautical system by urging the importance of statis- tical registration, have been held up to reprobation as an interference with the shipping interests, regardless of the fact that it is the public who pay the penalty of an enhanced price of goods transport consequent on whatever deficiencies may exist in connexion with the locomotive properties of our shipping. _ In justification of these remarks as to our denominations of ships’ tonnage and engine-power being a delusion, subversive of all truth so far as scientific inquiry and research may be based thereon, I may be permitted to adduce the following statements :— Ist. As to tonnage registration. Although tonnage measurement for re- ’ gistration has been subjected to legislative revision under the Merchant _ Shipping Act of 1854, the term “tonnage’’ is still made use of in various Significations. By the present law, 100 cubic feet of internal roomage, or available space for cargo, constitutes the unit of tonnage, but as respects all 7 426 : REPORT—1856. ships built previously to the month of May 1855, when this Act came into operation, the adoption of this law is not compulsory. Merchants have the privilege of retaining the former registration of some ships, and getting such others of their ships measured and registered under the new Act as they may think fit to select for re-registry, so that the term “tonnage” may now signify ‘builders’ tonnage,” old measure, under the Act of 1773, or tonnage under the Act of 1833, or tonnage under the Act of 1854; and these are three totally different systems of admeasurement, having no definite ratio to each other. Moreover, the unit of tonnage under the Act of 1854 being based on internal roomage measuring up to the deck, affords no certain indication of the displacement of a ship when loaded fit for sea, nor does it afford any assurance whatever as to the tons’ weight of cargo that a ship will earry ; for example, by adopting the cellular principle of build now introduced in the construction of iron ships, a ship of 10,000 cubic feet of internal roomage, or 100 tons register tonnage, may have such external displacement as would safely float with the whole internal roomage filled with iron, and therefore weighing no less than 1000 tons of dead weight, or ten times the register tonnage, and the registration of steam-ships is open to similar delusion as to their capability for weight of cargo. So much for the mercantile liberties that may possibly be introduced and taken with our statistics of exports and imports so far as they may be based on the tonnage registration of shipping under the Act of 1854. The abortiveness for statistical and scientific purposes which has hitherto attended all legislation on tonnage registration, appears to have been occa- sioned by the attempt to embrace under the one term “tonnage,” two things which have no fixed ratio to each other, namely, tonnage by bulk, and ton- nage by weight. The law has not comprehended the double mercantile use and application of the term “ton” by providing for the separate and distinct registration of each, namely, tonnage by bulk and tonnage by weight, the capability of ships for holding bulk tonnage being dependent on internal room- age; but the capability of ships for carrying weight tonnage being dependent. on external displacement, a distinction which is not noticed by the new law of tonnage admeasurement under the Act of 1854. 2nd. As to marine engine-power. Although Watt originally defined the unit of power, which he denominated horse-power, as equivalent to 33,000 lbs. weight raised one foot high in one minute of time, and invented a mecha- nical device or instrument called a “ steam-indicator,” whereby the variable pressure of the steam in the cylinder and consequently the working power of steam-engines could be readily ascertained (whence the working power so ascertained was denominated the “indicated horse-power”), all which ar- rangements of Watt put the working operation of the steam-engine originally on a scientific base, defined by a standard unit of power admeasurement, still this definite unit of power was never recognized by law, and conse- quently the steam-engine was uo svoner applied to maritime purposes, than the rivalry of trade introduced a practice under which the nominal, or contract power of engines, did not specifically regulate the working capability of the engine delivered. Engines were not objected to by the purchaser if their working capabilities were in excess of the nominal power, and engineers themselves voluntarily supplied marine engines working up to an “ indicated power far in excess of the nominal” power, for the purpose of thereby dri- ving the new vessel at a higher rate of speed than that attained by some rival vessel with the same nominal power. Reputation for the production of fast steamers depended on beating the rival boat, not on the mode of effecting that object, The shipping interests and their working craftsmen, ship- a wrights and engineers, felt themselves constrained to meet their rivals in trade with their rivals’ weapons ; numerous devices have been adopted with a view to the development of power on board of ship by packing the greatest amount of engine-power into the least space, and undoubtedly great improve- ments have been made by adapting the dimensions and proportions of vessels to the service required, but still “ Fame,” in regard to the character of steam- ships based on speed, has been too much the result of horse-power delusive jockeyship rather than of truthful science. By the practice of trade, horse- power came to be measured by the diameter of the cylinder, without any - limitation as to the capabilities of the boiler, and gradually in time a marine- engine contract was considered not to be fulfilled unless the engines were capable of working up to an “indicated horse-power ” at least double that of the contract nominal power; still, however, no specific limit was assigned either by eustom or by law; and at length to such a degree has competition set truth at defiance, that the working, or “indicated horse-power ” of engines delivered under contract, has frequently amounted to four times the nominal horse-power actually stipulated for by the contract. These facts are fully set forth in the paper read by me before the Society of Arts on the 16th of May, 1855. Having thus pointed out the indefinite application in steam-shipping practice of the terms “ tonnage” and “horse-power,” with reference to the definite terms “displacement” and “indicated horse-power,” it may be still further edifying that we illustrate the anomalies liable to result when these terms are used in combination with each other, as is constantly the case in expressing and recording the ratio of tonnage to power of a steam-ship. In exposition of this matter, I may again refer to the before-mentioned paper, whereby it will be seen that I selected ten vessels, in each of which the ratio of builders’ tonnage to nominal power was very nearly the same, namely, in the ratio of 100 tons of builders’ tonnage to 40 nominal horse-power, or 2% tons of tonnage to one nominal horse-power; but on comparing the constructors’ load displacement of these same ships, calculated in tons weight at 35 cubic feet of water to the ton, with the effective working power, based on indicator measurement, the ratio was found to be 100 tons displacement to 38 horse-power in one case, and 100 tons displacement to 281 horse-power in another. The recorded statistics of these ten vessels would lead one to infer that they are all powered in the same proportion of engine-power to size of ship ; but, in fact, they are all different, and on comparing the two extremes, one ship has no less than seven times the power of the other, in proportion to size of ship as determined by displacement. In fact, generally, the records of register-tonnage and nominal horse-power do not constitute statistical data of any value whatever for the scientific purpose of discriminating between the relative dynamic n‘erits of steam-ships, but, on the contrary, such records and all ideas resulting therefrom are positively delusive and mischievous. The conclusion at which I would arrive from these statements is, that the _ very first step in any attempts to bring steam affairs within the range of arithmetical calculation, must necessarily be to establish the measure or value which we assign to our units of tonnage and power. It is only by the moral influence of such a body as the British Association that the cause of science _ ean obtain a hearing in this matter of statistical registration applied to ship- _ ping. With reference to our units, it is, of course, desirable that the measure _ Of the unit, to be legally recognized as the unit of power, should be nearly _ in accordance with the general average of practice at the time when the unit _ may be so established; and as at the present time (1856) the general run of MERCANTILE STEAM TRANSPORT ECONOMY. 427 428 REPORT— 1856. marine nominal horse-power varies from two indicated horse-power to four indicated horse-power, that is from 66,000 lbs. to 132,000 lbs. raised one foot high per minute, it is submitted that the unit of marine horse-power would now be most conveniently fixed at 100,000 lbs. raised one foot high per minute. Until, however, some definite measure of the unit be legally recognized, it is considered advisable in matters of scientific inquiry like the present to adhere to the measure of the unit originally proposed by Watt, namely, 33,000 lbs. raised one foot high per minute, designating this scale of measurement as the ‘indicated horse-power,” thus :—Ind. h.p.; and such will be the unit referred to when horse-power is spoken of in the following pages of this paper. Now, as to the measure of the unit of tonnage by which the sizes of ships are to be spoken of and compared, we have already observed that under the Merchant Shipping Act passed in the year 1854, the unit of tonnage is based on the internal roomage of ships available for cargo; that all ships built since May 1855, are registered under this Act; but the re-measurement and re-registration of ships built previously to 1855 is not made compulsory. Shipowners have the privilege of re-registering, under the Act of 1854, such vessels as they may select for that purpose; consequently, our present regis- tration is mixed, and the various units of tonnage-measurement thus embraced under our present tonnage-registration have no definite ratio to each other, or to the tons weight of cargo that ships will carry. The comparative merits or demerits of these various systems of registration for fiscal purposes need not be here discussed. Suffice it to say, that in none of these systems has any notice whatever been taken of the measurements which constitute dis- placement; and as displacement is an essential element in any scientific in- vestigation as to the locomotive performance of steam-ships with reference to the power employed and speed attained, it follows that our present regis- tration of shipping, even under the Act of 1854, does not afford statistical data of such a character as to be available for science in the matter of com- paring the merits, in a locomotive or dynamic point of view, of the various models or types of form by which steam-ships have been constructed. It is submitted for the consideration of the British Association, that national ad- vancement in maritime affairs, especially in regard to transport economy, would be promoted by our public registration of shipping in general, and of steam shipping in particular, being so systematized as to embrace not only the roomage measurement required for fiscal purposes, but also, in addition, those details of displacement, which in combination with the data of speed and power derived from the actual performances of ships, are necessary to scientific investigation in determining the relative dynamic merits of different types of form of steam-ships. It must be borne in mind, that it is the public, the consumers of merchandise, who must ultimately bear all the expenses connected with the transport and delivery of merchandise, whether well or ill performed. Bad ships individually enhance the average cost of imported corn and all other consumable merchandise. Bad ships also enhance the price of cotton and all other similar raw material imported for the production of export manufactures. This enhanced price restricts demand, thus curtailing the sources of employment; so that every bad ship, whether employed in the import or export trade, is, of itself, a public nuisance: a prevalent bad type of ships would be a public calamity, and progressive improvement would be a public benefit. It has been said that the interests of shipowners is in itself a sufficient guarantee for ensuring the adoption of the type of ships best adapted for mercantile steam transport economy. It is scarcely fair to base any argument on interested motives, but as that argument has — MERCANTILE STEAM TRANSPORT ECONOMY. 429 ‘been raised it must be noticed. Undoubtedly, each shipowner has an individual interest in his own ships being the best afloat, but if he does possess the best ships, it is equally his interest to keep that fact and the means of acquiring them to himself, so that the charges for freight may con- tinue to be ruled by the inferior dynamic qualities of the average ships em- ployed by the trade, not by the superior dynamic qualities of the best ships as possessed by himself, the difference being the shipowner’s private advan- tage or the public’s loss. It is therefore the interest of the public that all bad types of shipping be exposed and eradicated. Freight would then, as respects the quality of ships, be ruled by a scale of charges derived from the performance of a generally improved type of ships working in fair com- petition with each other. Having already defined the measurement of the units by which we propose to designate the working power of the engines and the size of the ship, namely, ind. h.p. at 33,000 Ibs. raised one foot high per minute, and tons weight of displacement at 35 cubic feet of water to the ton, it is now neces- sary that we refer to the received law or formula by which the comparative dynamic duty of steam-ships may be numerically ascertained. The formula usually adopted for obtaining the coefficient of dynamic duty of steam- 3 D2 ships is (mae =) in which D is the displacement of the ship at the time of trial expressed in tons weight, V the speed (usually expressed in nautical miles per hour), and ind. h.p. the working power as ascertained by means of the indicator. The resultant number (C) deduced from this formula is termed the coefficient of dynamic performance. This coefficient (C) will be a constant number for all vessels of perfectly similar model or type of form, and of which the engines are equally effective in proportion to their gross ind. h.p.; but if the vessels be not of similar type, and the engines not equally effective in proportion to their ind. h.p., the coefficient (C) will vary, and thus the dynamic performance of different vessels will be comparatively ascertained. It is not our purpose in this paper to raise any question as to the scientific rationale or resultant accuracy of this formula; I will merely observe, that though open to criticism in several respects, the results of experience have demonstrated that this formula, when applied to any known type of ship, ex- pounds the mutual relations of displacement, power, and speed with a degree of precision that admits of its being practically made use of for determining the resultant speed that is to be expected from any combination of power and displacement, and in like manner, any one of the three elements of the formula may be deduced from the other two being given. Further, this formula may be rendered available as a counting-house check on the work- ing operation of steam-ships, simply by substituting the consumption of coals, expressed in cwts. per day of 24 hours (W), in lieu of the ind. h.p.; for 1 ewt., or 112 lbs., per day of 24 hours is at the rate of 4°66 lbs. per hour, which is probably about the ordinary consumption per ind. h.p. per hour, and it ought not to be exceeded. If, therefore, in lieu of the ind. h.p. we substitute the consumption of coals, calculated in ewts. per day of 24 hours, the resultant coefficient (C) will afford an approximate indication of the good or bad performance of ships, as compared one with another, and the fact of an inferior performance being thus detected, the cause to which it _ may be attributable, whether to inferior type of form, or foulness of bottom, or inferior adaptation of engine, or inferior construction of boiler, or inferior management on board ship, will then become the subject of professional in- quiry ; thus, the merchant, by aid of his counting-house statistics of displace- ment, time on passage of given length, and coals consumed, will be enabled 430 REPORT—1856. to detect the fact of inefficiency, and it will then be for the professional - engineer to detect and remedy the cause thereof, The annunciation of the formula, or the mercantile rule above referred to, is as follows :—Multiply the cube of the speed, expressed in knots or nautical miles per hour (V3), by the cube root of the square of the displacement (D2), and divide by the consumption of coals, expressed in ewts. per day of 24 hours, the resultant numeral coefficient (C) will indicate the dynamic or locomotive efficiency of the vessel; and such is the variable condition of steam-ships in present use, that the coefficient has been found to be as low in some cases as 120, whilst in other cases it has reached the number 250. The pecuniary value of gold is determined by assay ; and in like manner the contract price to be paid for a steam-ship should, in some measure, be regulated by the coefficient, based on the mutual relation of displacement, speed, and coals, which may be realized on trial of the ship; for example, multiply the contract price by the numeral coefficient that may be actually realized, and divide by the coefficient that may be regarded as the par measure of dynamic efficiency, according as the vessels may be painted or sheathed with copper. Contracts based on this principle would constitute a check upon the production of inefficient ships, and award a premium on the construction of ships of superior merit. Vs D2 The approximate trustworthiness of the formula ie =¢) being conceded, we now have the means of pursuing our exposition of the extent to which any definite difference of type or falling off in the working condition of a ship will affect the amount of prime cost expenses incurred in the con- veyance of merchandise by steam-ships. Suppose, for example, that we have ships whose coefficients of dynamic duty or index numbers (C) deduced 3 2 from the formula aos =C) are respectively 250 and 166, which num- bers correspond with 1000 and 664, if the unit of marine engine-power be taken at 4 ind. h.p., as is the case in the tabular calculations given in Ather- ton’s ‘Steam-ship Capability,’ and are coefficients of dynamic duty not unusual as between different steam-ships in actual practice; in evidence of which, confirmatory of the official records whence ti-cse numbers are taken, I may refer to a tabular statement of steam-ship trials recently supplied to me by one of our most experienced firms (engineers and shipbuilders), by which statement it appears, that, adopting the formula referred to, the index numbers or coefficients of dynamic duty of eight steam-ships varied from 251 to 149, thus showing that the difference of constructive types now assumed as the base of calculation for this exposition, is not an exaggeration, but such as is common in practice. In the first place, referring to ‘ Steam-ship Capa- bility, 2nd edit. page 78, we will expose the difference of power (ind. h.p.) which would be required by two vessels, A and B, of the respective types or working conditions of service indicated by the coefficients above referred to (namely 250 and 166), supposing the vessels to be each of 2500 tons load displacement. The vessel A will be propelled at 8 knots, 10 knots, and 12 knots per hour, by 376 ind.h.p., 736 ind.h,p., and 1272 ind.h.p. ; but the vessel B will require, to attain the same rate of speed, 568 ind. h.p., 1112 ind. h.p., and 1920 ind. h.p. Thus the ship B requires, in consequence of her inte- riority of working condition, or type of construction, an increase of power of no less than 50 per cent. in order to attain the same rate of speed as ship A; and, be it observed, that these assumed coefficients are within the range of ordinary difference between one ship and another. We will now show the sacrifice which such a difference of type produces Det mt MERCANTILE STEAM TRANSPORT ECONOMY. 431 in the weight of cargo which these ships of (say) 2500 tons displacement, with mean quantity of coal on board, would respectively carry on a given passage, if powered for running at the speed of 8, 10, and 12 knots per hour. For this exposition we will assume the weight of the ships themselves, as measured by the light displacement of ships, when ready to receive cargo and coal for the voyage, to appropriate 1000 tons displacement, being 40 per cent. of the load displacement. We will also assume the weight of the engine department complete at 5 ewts. per ind. h. p., and the consumption of coal to be at the rate of 4 Ibs. per ind. h.p. per hour, and the length of passage, without re-coaling, to be 3250 nautical miles, being about the distance from Liverpool to New York, or to Constantinople. On these data, according as the vessels may be powered, as before shown, for being propelled at the speed of 8, 10, and 12 knots per hour, the displacement available for cargo in A will be 1270 tons, 1103 tons, and 875 tons weight of cargo; while in B it will be 1152, 900, and 556 tons weight. The consumption of coal in A will be 973 tons at 8 knots, 427 tons at 10 knots, and 615 tons at 12 knots; and in B it will be 412, 645, and 929 tons weight. Hence it appears that purely in consequence of the difference in constructive type, or working condition of the ships, the reduction of cargo in B, as compared with A, will be 9, 18, and 36 per cent., according as the speed may be, 8, 10, or 12 knots per hour; while the increase of coal, being in proportion to the increase of power, will in each case be 50 per cent. But the public evils of an inferior type, or neglected condition of ships, will be still more fully exposed, and be more definitely understood by the extra £s.d. charge that must be made for freight per ton weight of goods conveyed, in order to meet the prime cost expense of conveyance. In order to work out this calculation, we must assume certain data of investment and current expense as constituting the prime cost charges of permanently establishing and upholding a commercial fleet of steam-ships ; and as this is the vital point in which the public, as con- sumers, have a direct interest, it will be expected that I enter upon it in con- siderable detail, as set forth in Supplement to ‘ Steam-ship Capability,’ 2nd edit. page 76. In the first place, I would remark that it is only during the number of days _ that steamers are annually at sea conveying cargoes of goods from port to port that they earn the income that is to defray the whole annual expenditure incurred. The number of days per annum during which steamers are at sea will, of course, depend materially on the service in which they may be employed; and as it is proposed to work out our calculations with reference _ to a passage of 3250 nautical miles—such, for example, as the passage from England to New York or to the Black Sea—I have assumed that the vessels _ employed on such service may be at sea 200 days per annum. In the next place, the cost of coal is a very material item, greatly dependent on the service on which the vessels may be employed. This I have assumed at £2 per ton weight as the average cost of the yearly consumption. Next, as to the ship ; I have assumed that a ship of 2500 to 3000 tons load displacement would be purchased from the builders as a ship of about the same amount of tonnage, builders’ measurement, and that the cost of the ship, completely fitted, equipped, and furnished in all respects ready for sea, would be £25 per ton, Then, assuming the interest on investment at £5 per cent. per annum, _ the upholding and replacement at 10 per cent. per annum, insurance at 5 per _ cent, per annum, and wages and rations of officers and crew all the year _ round at £3 per 100 tons per week ; on these data we shall have the prime _ cost expenses incidental to the hull amounting to £6 11s. 2d. per ton of tonnage per annum, which is 8d. per day sea-time, assuming the vessel to be 432 REPORT—1856. at sea 200 days per annum, exclusive of harbour dues, lights, and pilotage, which are supposed to be the same for all ships of equal tonnage. Next, as to the engine department :— The average price of marine condensing engines, as now usually con- structed, may be rated at £50 per nominal horse-power, and in general each horse-power nominal may be expected to work up to 23 ind. h.p., so that the cost of marine engines may be rated at £20 perind.h.p. Then, assuming the interest on investment at 5 per cent. per annum on the contract cost, the upholding and replacement at 10 per cent., insurance 5 per cent., wages and rations of engineers and stokers at £5 per 100 ind. h.p. per week, consu- mable stores (coal excepted) £2 10s. per 100 ind. h.p. per week, on these data we shall have the prime cost expenses incidental to the engine department (exclusive of coal), amounting to £7 18s. per ind. h.p. per annum, which is 9d. per day per ind. h.p. sea-time, assuming the vessel to be at sea 200 days per annum. These assumed data of pecuniary charges incidental to steam-ship transport service, as applied to mercantile purposes, combined with the mutual relations of displacement, power, and speed, which are derivable from the foregoing Peta anagamataes Cit Gs quality of the ship, as shown by the coefficient or index number C, enable us to make up the prime cost expenses, being the minimum at which goods can be conveyed, and which therefore should constitute the base of the estimate by which a minimum scale of freight charges should be estimated; and applying these data to the ships A and B, employed on a passage of 3250 nautical miles, as exemplified in the Supplement to Atherton’s ‘ Steam-ship Capability,’ 2nd edition, page 7S, the minimum scale of freight charges per ton of goods, according as the vessels may be powered for a speed of 8, 10, or 12 knots per hour, will, on the data referred to, require to be as follows :— =C) according to the constructive type or locomotive 8 knots. 10 knots. 12 knots. Ship WA yn ctenes tices £115 7 £2. 4 6 £3 4 6 Ship Bs ae > ees, OPW feta) Se 89 bus 616 3 The proportions in which goods, according to their respective kinds, may be made to bear freight charges so as to yield the average return per ton weight on the entire cargo, is altogether a matter of commercial discretion and management. The entire cargo must be made to yield the average return per ton weight here set forth. Hence it appears that 12 miles speed involves about double the freight cost _ of the 8 miles speed with the superior ship A, and nearly three times the cost of the 8 miles speed with the ship B, and 12 miles speed with the ship B is about four times as expensive as the 8 miles speed with the ship A. Also, the extra cost to the public at which freight charges are enhanced by the in- ferior type or inferior working condition of ship B, as compared with the ship A, if continuously employed on the passage of 3250 nautical miles, and under the data referred to, assuming the consumption of coal to be at the rate of 4 lbs. per ind. h.p. per hour, and according as the steaming speed of both ships may be 8, 10, or 12 knots per hour, is no less than 32 per cent. at 8 knots, 56 per cent. at 10 knots, and 111 per cent. at 12 knots. Undoubt- edly, the details of the data on which the foregoing calculations have been based are open to correction, and will greatly depend on their application to special services on considerations immediately connected with such special service, and cannot be generalized; but, whatever alteration of these data may be applied to the ship A must likewise be applied to B, so that, although MERCANTILE STEAM TRANSPORT ECONOMY. 433 the foregoing estimate of the actual cost expenses of freight may be consider- ably modified by our altering the data of the calculations, still the per- centages of difference above set forth, showing the degree or per-centage in which freight charges for the passage of 3250 miles are enhanced in conse- quence of the infericrity in locomotive properties of the ship B, as compared with the ship A, will not be much altered from the per-centages above set forth, showing an enhanced cost of freight to be paid by the public on bring- ing cargo, grain forinstance,from the States, or from the Black Sea, to England, amounting to 32 percent.at the 8 knots speed, 56 percent.at the 10 knots speed, and 111 per cent. at the 12 knots speed, extra charges incurred on freight per ton of goods conveyed, and to be paid by the public, in consequence of the dynamic inferiority of ship B, as compared with ship A. It is surely in con- sequence of the public not being generally aware of the high scale of prime cost charges necessarily involved in a 12 miles speed (steaming speed at sea), as compared with an 8 miles speed, that such high speed is so universally de- manded by the public; and it must surely be in consequence of an almost similar want of insight into the real cost of high speed on the part of directors, that obligations as to speed are so frequently incurred at a price inadequate tosuchservice. If the public will have a progressively increasing high rate of speed, they must pay for it about in the ratio at which they purchase iron, copper, silver, gold, and diamonds, either of which may be bought too dear for common use. The foregoing results have been based on the supposition that the consump- tion of fuel in both ships is at the rate of 4 lbs. per hour per ind. h.p. My own experience, however, induces me to be of opinion that this rate of con- sumption is but very seldom realized, and that 5 lbs. of coal per ind. h.p. per hour is much nearer in accordance with our present actual steaming prac- tice. It is therefore important that we show to what extent the rate of trans- port freight expenses will be enhanced, if the service above referred to, namely 3250 nautical miles direct, be performed with an inferior construc- tion of boiler, causing a consumption of 5 lbs. of coal per indicated horse- power per hour, instead of 4 lbs., as above calculated on. In this case, accord- ing as the speed for which the vessel may be powered is 8, 10, or 12 knots an hour (see ‘Steam-ship Capability,’ p.'78), the cost expenses incurred by vessel A, instead of being £1 15s. 7d., £2 4s. 6d., and £3 4s. 6d. per ton-weight of cargo, will now amount to £1 19s. 5d., £2 11s. 4d., and £3 19s. 1d. per ton-weight of cargo, this increase of prime cost freight expenses per ton of goods being 11 per cent., 15 per cent., and 22 per cent., according as the service speed may be 8, 10, or 12 knots per hour, solely in consequence of the inferiority of the boiler, or inferiority of boiler-management, causing this extra consumption of fuel; and further, if this greater consumption of coal _be combined with the inferior type of vessel B, the prime cost expenses of freight per ton of goods, instead of being £1 15s. '7d., £2 4s.6d., and £3 4s.6d., will now be £2 13s. 7d., £4 5s. 5d., and £9 15s. 2d., this increase of freight cost being 18s. per ton, £2 Os. 11d. per ton, and £6 10s. 8d. per ton weight of cargo conveyed, or 50 per cent., 100 per cent., and 202 per cent. extra charge incurred according as the service speed may be 8, 10, or 12 knots per hour. These results show the monstrous extent, in a pecuniary point of view, to which the public are interested in the general quality of the type of ‘ships and machinery adaptation thereto, and working condition of ships by _ which the mercantile transport service of the country may be prosecuted. But let us look a little further into this matter, in the hope of obtaining _@ more definite appreciation of the total extent in & s. d. to which the British public are interested in having their mercantile transport service per-- —:1856. QF 484 REPORT—1856. formed to the best advantage. It has been publicly stated (‘ Times,’ June 18, 1856) that at the twelve principal ports of the United Kingdom during the year 1855, ship tonnage to the extent of 6,372,301 tons entered inwards, and 6,426,566 tons cleared outwards, making altogether 12,798,867, say 125 millions of tons of tonnage per annum; and since mercantile shipping will probably, on the average, carry dead weight of cargo to the full extent of their register tonnage, it is probable that the tons weight of merchandise con- stituting the cargoes of ships arriving at and sailing from the United -King- dom, amounts to no less than twelve millions of tons per annum, of which, for the purpose of illustration, we will suppose that one-sixth part, or two millions of tons, is conveyed by steam power on a passage of 3250 nautical miles, under the circumstances of the data that have been assumed as the base of the foregoing calculations ; and since we have shown under these circum- stances that the prime cost expenses of freight per ton of goods may be enhanced by an inferior type of ship and machinery, or inferior management thereof, to the extent of 18s., £2 Os. 11d., and £6 10s. 8d. per ton weight of goods conveyed, it follows that the extra charges for freight on the assumed quantity of two millions of tons weight per annum, will amount to the extra annual cost or public loss of £1,800,000 at 8 knots speed, £4,916,666 at 10 knots speed, and £13,666,666 at 12 knots speed, according as the type of ship and machinery by which the work is performed may be of the inferior type B, as compared with the superior type A; seeing also that it is the public interest which has to bear the brunt of our national goods transport service, being either as respects construction or working condition anything short of that degree of perfection which the application of science might achieve, is it not, therefore, of importance that our public system of statistical shipping registration should be complete, especially in those points which are essential for scrutinising the dynamic properties of steam-ships, thus leading to the recognition of good practice on the one hand, or the exposition of bad practice and consequent public loss on the other? Ships may be regarded as national implements for doing the work of the nation, and should therefore be sub- jected, by the aid_of statistical registration, to public scrutiny, as conducive to their being upheld fit to do their work in the best manner. A shipbuilder will not allow his interests to be trifled with by the use of a blunt adze, so the public interest requires that its national transport service in the couvey- ance of goods should not be performed by bad ships if the statistical grind- stone will obviate the evil. Nevertheless, the public statistics of British ship- ping afford no data available to science for promoting or even protecting from abuse the great public interests which are involved in the proper execu- tion of its transport service, amounting probably to twelve millions of tons perannum. It is pre-eminently for the British Association to suggest the remedy for this humiliating fact. ’ The subject herein treated of admits of extended illustration beyond the limits of time that I may presume to occupy at a meeting of the British Association. I only profess to have broken up new ground, in showing that mercantile transport service by steam-ships admits of being brought within the range of arithmetical calculation, whereby the dynamic quality of ships, the size of ships as measured by displacement, the working quality of engines and engine-power as measured by the unit ind. h.p., and the speed to be assigned as the condition of any service, may each of them be treated as functions of calculation involving definite pecuniary considerations, consti- tuting a system which may be denominated the “ arithmetic of steam-ship adaptation to the requirements of mercantile service.” By the application of — these principles of calculation, I submit that errors in steam-ship construction, MERCANTILE STEAM TRANSPORT ECONOMY. 435 or neglect of its working condition, may be exposed, correction will follow, the directorial management of steam-shipping affairs, as respects steam-ship capability, will be based upon arithmetical calculation, thereby prosecuting its assigned service with confidence, and rejecting all Utopian projects that will not pay. Thus science will produce its fruit in promoting public in- terests, without detriment to the fair competitive pursuits of any class, by pro- ducing a sound, well-understood, and healthy condition of steam-ship manage- ment, and consequently of “ Mercantile Steam Transport Economy.” Remarks by James R. Napier, Glasgow, on Mr. Atherton’s Paper on Mer- cantile Steam Transport Economy. I quite agree with Mr. Atherton in regard to the indefiniteness of the term horse-power as at present used in steam-engine contracts, and in the desirableness of having a dynamical unit, or standard of power or work legalized, as well for the purpose of buying and selling machines produ- cing power, as for that of scientific comparison. The rule or formula established by James Watt for the horse-power of condensing engines was PxV_ _ foot lbs. per minute 33,000 °* 33,000 velocity (V) had either their actwal values or fractional parts thereof. But at the present time the pressure (P) is continued at what it was in the days of Watt, viz. 7 lbs., no matter what the actual pressure may be now. And for the velocity (V) almost every engineer has a scale of his own, varying according to the length of stroke of the steam-piston; some assuming the velocities to vary as V (of the length of stroke), others following the Admi- ralty rule for paddle engines assuming the velocities to vary as W (of the length of stroke). All these assumptions, moreover, have no necessary con- nexion with the results desired, nor with the actual results afterward obtained ; nor do they answer any better the purpose either of the buyer or seller; and all the use they subserve is to fix the size of the cylinder by the very round- about method of resolving an arithmetical or algebraical equation in which two of the three quantities, diameter, length of stroke or velocity, and horse- power required to be known. _ As the term horse-power applied to steam-engines was fixed by Watt at $3,000 lbs. raised 1 foot high per minute, and as this same value is used by the Americans, the French, the Germans, and, I presume, by all nations where the history of the steam-engine is known, I should be very sorry to recommend any change as to the use of the name in any other sense than as synonymous with 33,000 Ibs. per minute. I see no objection, however, to the entire abolition of the term Nominal Horse-Power, as it is of no use whatever to the engineer, as little to steam-engine owners, and deceitful to the public. _ As I adhere to 33,000 lbs. per minute being received as a horse-power, I would object to the 33,000 being altered into 132,000, or into any other figure, without at the same time changing the name into something alto- gether different from Horse-Power or Marine Horse-power. I would sug- gest that the power be expressed in foot Ibs. alone, as this is a term already mown to all scientific nations. Dividing by 1,000,000, the result would be Simply stated in millions of foot lbs. _As to the tonnage question, I feel I know very little about it, except that the present law is very complex, and certainly does not give what Mr. Atherton would like, viz. the displacement. That part of Mr. Atherton’s paper concerning the comparison of vessels 2"2 = horse-power, where the pressure (P) and 436 , REPORT—1856. is very important. What other writers have called the efficiency or the ratio of the power expended to the work produced, is surely a subject which all shipowners ought to be acquainted with. The formula adopted by Mr. Atherton for the efficiency or dynamical duty of steam-ships, is, I fear, too rough an approximation to be recommended for general adoption, especially when a more exact and equally simple formula is at hand, and the one also from which Mr. Atherton’s adopted formula is no doubt deduced, viz. V3 x mid. secti a ead =C. The power in similar vessels, I here take for granted, at present varies as the cube of the velocity. This, I believe, is nearly true, and ought to vary also directly as the immersed midship section. For simi- lar vessels the midship section no doubt varies as displacement raised to the power 2rds; but scarcely any two vessels are similar (in the mathema- tical sense of the term); nor is the same vessel similar to itself when the draft of water varies. The following Table, deduced from published statements of some of the ships of the Navy, and also from vessels built by the firm with which I am connected, shows the difficulty there would be in the use of the formula V® (displacement) 2=C, from the (displacement) 3 having no necessary connexion with the midship section :— Comparison between Midship Sections, and ( Displ.)*. Mid. section. | (Displ)s. | Ratio of mid. 2 sec.to (disp.)*- HAS uxiaiche ofatou she cretet tober: 807 212°5 1000: 263 Am phion tea viel. slag tate 546 160° 1000: 290 Arrogant .. 2.000500 0 580 181°4 1000 :313 Blerthenm ric siete sta) aecorsy- 738 198-2 1000 : 267 Dauntless .......... 522 1712 1000: 328 Euphrates .......... 570 179°:25 | 1000:314 EVOPNE/ seis sitcoler ebietsles 820 215° 1000: 261 Horatio iso cei emeeeas 537 142°8 1000 : 266 NAUSPATEUS cies) =/ Re Dag a ae auc = 3 ce > > a Pal oy ox be vie 4 ah -¢ Sake . ; . re ae = : : a, a : rl hoy 7 fk, y eS es ‘ au ‘= hoe. ph Siw ata: ¥ | 4 ; , ; : ; 7 - NOTICES AND ABSTRACTS OF MISCELLANEOUS COMMUNICATIONS TO THE SECTIONS. MATHEMATICS AND PHYSICS. MATHEMATICS. On the Polyhedron of Forces. By J. T. Graves, M.A., F.R.S. Ir any number of forces, represented in number and magnitude by the faces of a polyhedron, and in direction perpendicular to those faces, act upon a point, they will keep it in equilibrium. The above is the proposition which is called by the writer “the Polyhedron of Forces.’’ It has probably occurred to many, that the well-known geometrical representation in magnitude and direction of a system of balanced forces acting upon a point by the sides of a closed polygon is so simple and complete that nothing needs to be noted beyond the polygon of forces. What is commonly called the parallelopipedon of forces—which is the elementary theorem in solid space analogous to the parallelogram of forces—represents by the diagonal of a parallelopipedon the resultant force, which balances the three forces represented by the areas. But there the separate forces are represented by lines. The writer was led more than ten years ago to the representation of forces by areas in making researches respecting complex numbers with a new imaginary symbol. He has mentioned the result here enunciated to several mathematicians, to whom it has appeared familiar, and who have believed that it must have been already published; but the writer has searched for it in collections of memoirs and works on statics, and has been unable to find it in print. He has, accordingly, been advised by a very learned scientific friend to occupy it, if it has not been already appropriated. With this view, he takes this opportunity of publishing it to the British Association. On the Congruence nx==n+1 (mod p). By Joun T. Gravzs, M.A., F.R.S. As is well known to those who have studied foreign works on the theory of num- . bers, the expression a=6 (mod. ec) denotes that a—b divided by c is a whole number. When this relation has place, _ a and 6 are said to be congruent with respect to the modulus ec, and the relation itself is called a congruence. Mr. J. T. Graves shows, from elementary principles of the theory of numbers, : that in the congruence » nt —=n-+1 (mod. p), _ if p be a prime number, and if m be made to assume, in regular ascending order, all values from 1 to p—1 inclusive, x will be found to have, in some order or other, all values from 2 to p inclusive. 1856. ; 1 —— 2 . REPORT—1856. Taking, for example, the modulus 7, the congruence nz —=n-+1 (mod. p) is a type of the six congruences (mod. 7), 1.2=2 2.53 3.6=4 4.3>5 5.46 6.1% in which, while to are given successively the values 1.2.3.4.5.6, we give tox the corresponding values 2, 5, 6, 3, 4, 7. From this simple theorem Mr. J. T. Graves derives Wilson’s famous theorem, namely,— ‘« When p is a prime number, we have 1.2.3....(@—l) =—1 (mod. p).” It is easy to see that the congruence (p—1)x=p is solved by making =p, and hence, by the preceding theorem, it is possible to find among the quantities 2.3.4.., p—1, distinct values, including all numbers from 2 to p—1, for a, 2, 3,.. Xp—2, such that 1. 4,2 2 eSB OE ONT) GS SER SY () Stat A Le oy As, ce ate emer) (p—2)x2p-2=p—l. If, as is allowable, we substitute 1. a, for the factor 2 in the left-hand member of congruence (a), we get Ds 58q):0; Bg Sones weld pumels sy hls) —Semiane (c) Again, if we substitute 1 . 2) . x, for the factor 3 in the left-hand member of con- gruence (b), we get 1.%.%,.%3==4; and proceeding similarly, we find 1.m,.%,.%3...¢%p—2=—p—l=—l,. « «+ « + dd) but by Mr. J. T. Graves’s theorem, 1. %.%q.%g....2p—2—1.2.3....(p—2)(p—D.- Hence we have by (d), 1.2.3....(p—2)(p—l) =—1. QED. For example, with respect to modulus 7, we obtain in this manner the six con- gruences, 1=1 22 rhe ee ee 1.2.5.6=4 1.2.5.6.3=5 122,6,..6 3.8 =o: the last congruence being equivalent to 1.2.3.4.5.6=—1 (mod. 7). Wilson’s theorem is thus exhibited as the last of a series of minor theorems. TRANSACTIONS OF THE SECTIONS. 3 In introducing the subject of his paper, Mr. J. T. Graves took occasion to point out that the late Mr. Peter Barlow’s valuable work ‘On the Theory of Numbers,’ pub- lished in 1811, which is the only elemenary text-book of note in our language spe- “ae directed to that subject, is not sufficient for the requirements of modern English students. ; Two Memoirs.—I. On a Theorem in Combinations. II. On a particular Class of Congruences. By Henry M. Jerrery, M.A., Second Master of Pate’s Grammar School, Cheltenham. I. Ad Theorem in Obnianctlanis: 1. It is proposed to determine the number of combinations of 2 things taken severally 1, 2, 3,... together, where there are p of one sort, q of another, r of another, &c. We will begin by examining a simple case, where there are three quan- tities, a, 5, c. The product of the factors (1+ar+ a’2")(1+ ce), or 1+(a+c)¢+4 (a?+ac)z?+a°cx"*, contains the combinations of the three quantities taken 1, 2, 3 severally together. Their numbers in each case are found by equating a, c to unity; or 30,;=2; ,C,=2; ,C,=1; subject to the above restriction, that two of the three quantities are equal. The same process of reasoning is easily extended to the general case, as proposed. : The product of the factors (ltarta@e?+...... -aPa? xX (1+br+ br? + ...... + 6127) X (l4+er+ea?+ ...... +c" x") SOAS eto os contains the combinations of the ~ quantities taken severally 1, 2, 3,..2 together, viz. in the coefficients of 2, z”, v°.. 2”. The number of the combinations in each case is found by equating a, b,c... to unity. Hence any particular combination ,,C,, is found by finding the coefficient of that power of a in the expansion of (lta+a°+.. +a?)(l+a4+a°+ .. +a7)(l+a+a?+..+27)......(A) whose index is k. Or the rule may be otherwise conveniently stated: ,C,= the coefficient of x* in the expansion of 1—gPt! J —x9+1 J—grti - . . a l—z © 1—w# ~ 1—-z 2. It is important to observe that, subject to these restrictions, C,,-~=nCye as is proved by the circumstance, that 2 and 1 may be interchanged in the above formula (A) without altering its value. 1* 4 REPORT—1856. Hence we conclude that there is no necessity for investigating the coeffi- nl] it n be odd. This consideration vastly diminishes the labour of expansion. 8. The total number of possible combinations is found by equating 2 to unity in the formula (A), and subtracting 1 from the result, since 1 is the first term in the expansion involving no power of z, and therefore cannot denote the number of any combination. Hence the number required is (p+ I(Qt1)(r74+1)...... —1; which is a known theorem. 4. Example: To find the number of combinations that can be formed of the letters of the word ‘‘ Notation” taken severally 1, 2, 3, ... 8 together. There are two n’s, two o’s, two ?’s, one a, one 2. The numbers required are found by expanding, at least as far as 2*, (1—a*)*. (1-2)? (i—z2)° =(1—32?+ .... )(1—22?+4 2*) x (1+524+15274+ 352°+ 702*+..) =1+452+ 1327+ 222° + 262*+.... The series can now be completed by aid of the theorem cients of powers of x beyond 5 if m be even, or beyond =(1—2*)}(1—2?)?. (l—2)~* Cy_n=8Cx: 1+ 52+ 1327+ 2223 + 2627+ 222° + 132°+ 5274+ 2°. The total number of possible combinations =5+13+4 224 264 224+1384+5+4+1=107=3.3.3:2.2—1, as might have been obtained at once by the formula (pt)I(q4+)(r+))... —1. This example was selected to contrast the tentative method used in ‘ Lund’s Companion to Wood’s Algebra,’ p. 111, London, 1852, in the particular case of k=3. I quote the author’s words :— ‘Here are five different letters: the number of combinations of five letters, 3 together, where no letter recurs = axe SSH 0p ** Also there are two n’s, two o’s, and two ?’s, each of which pairs may be combined with each of the other four letters, and form four combinations.of three, making altogether 3 x 4=12 such combinations where the letters recur, * number required =10+12=22.” 5. To find the number of permutations of 2 things taken 1, 2, 3,..2 together, when x consists of groups of identical quantities, p of one sort, g of another, 7 of another, &c. In the following solution we shall denote ,P,, ,P,,.. +P, by powers of P, Viz. P, P?, ... P”, and subject P to the laws of indices. In order to see more clearly the method and notation that will be adopted, let us examine the familiar case of four different quantities, a, b, c,d. The permutations are contained in the coefficients of the several powers of v in the expansion of (1+ Par)(1+ Poz)(1+Pex)(1+Pdz), : .TRANSACTIONS OF THE SECTIONS. 5 or 1+ (a+b+c+d)Px-+ (ab+ac+ ad+ be+ bd-+ ed)P*x? + (abe+ abd+ acd+ bcd) P*x* + abcdP*zt. The number of the permutations in each -case is given by the coefficients of the several powers of 2 in the expansion of (1+ Pz)’ or 1+4Pa+ 6P?2?+ 4P%43+ Piz. That is, gh, =4P=4: {P,=6P=12: ,P,=4P?=24: ,P,=Pt*= 24. Next consider the case of a, a, c, d. The permutations are contained in the coefficients of the powers of z in the expansion of (Ita. Pa ©. Pe wate. Px)(1+d. Pr), or 1+(a+e+d) Pre+ (ac+ad+ cd+ )pe a@.c+d a*cd d)\Pig84 2% pigs +( [75 +a0d )Pat-+ oo v The justice of this conclusion may be seen by examining the mode of for- mation of each coefficient. . The number is found by equating a, c, d to unity: 1+3Pa+2P?2?+ 2P%a*+ $Pie*. Hence aP = 8 : gPo=7 : GPs=12 : ,Pi=12. The general theorem may be expressed as follows :— nP,,= the coefficient of z* in the expansion of (1+Pe tity. + Em") x(1+Pet TS ra +o) x(1+Pe+ FS asain 2) where P is subject to the law of indices, We may observe that Pr L” P= SS Lert. pReopmnps 9: a well-known theorem. 6. The total number of permutations of things taken 1, 2, 3... 2 together is P? pP (1+P+ io Loe | L? 2 q x (1+P+ BEC, aia: ==) j L? 2 r x(1+P+P5+..+=2) 1.2 L” 6 REPORT—1856. where it must be observed that P and its various powers have no meaning, until the expansion has been effected. 7. Ex. ‘‘ Notation.” The number of permutations in each case is contained in the expansion of 22 3 (14+Pe+ 3) . (1+ Pa)’, or 24(14 Px)®+3(1+ Px)’ +3(1 + Pa)'+ (1+ Pa)’} 8 =145Pr+ = P°2? + 16P82+ = P*a?+ s PPx*® + Sh Piaf 4 Prat + a. In this case, therefore, gP,=5: gP,=23: gPs=96: ,P,=—354: ,P,=1110: ,Pg=2790: gP;=5040: ,P,=5040. To test these results, examine ,P,. There are five different letters, 2, 0, ¢, a, i, whose permutations taken three together = 60. There are twelve groups of the form ‘‘nno,” each of which may be per- muted three times, or there are thirty-six permutations of this form. In all 60+ 36=96. 8. It is presumed that a general method is preferable to the tentative pro- cess, which requires considerable acuteness in detecting the several groups, and leaves a liability to error after all. Hence it is hoped that this theorem, which supplies a desideratum in every-day algebra, may be worthy of the attention of the Meeting. Il. A particular Class of Congruences. 1. If 3, denote 1742"437+ ..+(p—1)”, where p is a prime number, Smo (mod. p.); unless m=r( p—1), when Ex p—1) = (p—)). 2. If a, 6, c, d denote four of the series I, 2, 3,.. p—1, 3(a?-")=(p—1); BaP? )=1 S(a?~1b?—1cP—1) —(p—1); SCG? bP cP gal 1 pare 1. If p is prime, the congruence w—l.a—2.... e—p+1—(a2”"'—1)=o0 (mod. p.) has p—1 roots 1, 2, 3,....p—1: and since this congruence is only of the ( p—2)th degree in z, the coefficients of the several powers of 2 are sepa- rately congruous to p. Hence we have $) ==0, Sy=0,.... Sp—2 =0, Sp-1 = —1, where s, denotes the sum of the roots, le 6. a re taken two and two, Sp 21-eaeest <- (ces. thei product, The above paragraph contains Serret’s demonstration of Wilson’s theorem. TRANSACTIONS OF THE SECTIONS. 7 Now observing the meaning of 3,,, we have from the theory of equations the following relations between the symbols = and s in the equation a1 5, P24. 5, oP 38 2. +5p-1=0. =,—s,=0. 2,—s, 2, +2 s,=0. 23—s, 2,+s, 2;—3 s,=0, 2p—1—$, Zp—2 Sy Yp—3— soa FF =0. Zp —S) Zp-1 +S, Zp-2 wieidvewe +5Sp-1 2, 2yp—2 —S, Zyp—3t 8p cs a ve e+ FSp—1 Up-1=0. Hence we establish the aawne tA SSPE S i— =| =s, =o (mod. p.) By SS — 2 S90... «2s 2p-2 = 0. 2p-1 = —(p—1)s-1 =p. By p—2 = —Sp-1 Yp-1 =p—l. 2+(p—1) = —Sp-1 Ze@—1(p-1) =p. 2. To prove the second proposition, we will premise the following con- gruence ;— See if p is prime, according as r is even or odd. For 2a OPA ee P—t is always an integer ; ister L -p—2....p—r+1.2....7 is an integer, and is therefore a multiple of p, since p is a prime greater than any of the factors of the denominator. 3. 3(a?-) )=p—1= —1, as has been proved above. (p— es el 1) _@- DG) } cy 1.2 gtian i, ae pacenats ae S(a?— 1 oP = ‘p—1 oa 2 3p Srl) 3 peas) SAR pate Sader =~, 1.2.3 .2.3 ae D(a?! pp} eb hg?) — (Bp-1)'—6 Bp p—2 - (Bp—1)" +8 - By p—a + Bp + 3( By p—2)’— 6 By p—4 Z(aP-} ae 1)" Eee Tat raj? spdts 4 = (p—1)'—6(p—1)*+11(p= 1)" 6(p=1)_p—1 .p=2.p—3 .p—4 1.2.3.4 1.2.3.4 =+1. 8 REPORT—1 856. oper 4, From observing the symmetry of formation x(a?) =P = 1 =(a"* iat) es sa p-2= +1 os 12 p-1,p—-1 ,p-} —p—1.p—2.p—3__j 2 ae = i ee ee pal. pin Pe ae BCP BE oP) =a gg and observing that a prl.p—B...s.. Por yy, 1 eee w= one cannot help guessing at the general theorem (a?) BP) oP“! P71) = 41 (mod p.), according as the number of factors a, 6, c,.. k is even or odd. But the process of determining the value of B(a? b% c”.... k‘) in terms of the sums of powers of the roots is so laborious, that the law, which seems to exist, has not been verified beyond four factors. The theorems might have been multiplied indefinitely ; but two only have been selected, as being the most striking in their results. 5. Numerical examples :— 1424+3 +4= 10=0 (mod. 5) 1°4+274+3°+4= 30=0 13+ 23+ 33+ 445=100=0 14+ 244 31+ 44= 354=4 142*+ 1434+ 134? + 243+ 2144+ 3!44= 26481 = 1 (mod. 5) 13243*+- 132444 + 133144 + 2'3!44= 357904 = 4. 13 2r8 4 — 90/4 Go ==. On a New Method of Treating the Doctrine of Parallel Lines. By Prof. Stevetty. The author stated that from the days of Euclid to the present, all geometricians admitted that Euclid’s twelfth axiom was a property to be proved, and not an axiom to be assumed as self-evident ; but hitherto no satisfactory and sufficiently element- ary proof of it had been adduced. He then showed that, by defining parallel lines to be “‘ when two lines in the same plane were both perpendicular to the same line, they should be called parallel,” all the properties of parallel lines as proved by Euclid could be shown to belong to these, by two supplementary propositions, The TRANSACTIONS OF THE SECTIONS. 9 second of these was, that the line joining any two points along parallel lines, assumed at an equal distance from the line to which both are perpendicular, formed right angles with each of the parallel lines. The author then went through the series of geometrical proofs, which would, however, be unsuited to our report, con- cluding with the proof of the twelfth axiom of Euclid. Models to illustrate a new Method of teaching Perspective. By H. R. 'Tw1n1ne. The object of this communication is to explain the principles of perspective in such a manner as may enable those who draw to distribute their objects not only in a correct manner, but in one agreeable to the eye. The method affords an intermediary step between those rules which are demonstrated by diagrams in the usual treatises, and those appearances which characterize natural objects themselves. The chief dif- ficulty in enabling an audience to follow out the principles of perspective when applied to solid objects is, that every individual sees these from a different position ; so that such an explanation of the effect observed as is adapted to one individual cannot suit another. Mr. Twining’s method aims at overcoming this difficulty by placing an image (with which each individual is supposed to identify himself) in the exact spot which the observer ought to occupy, and which serves to mark the true focus of the picture. ° Licut, Heat, ELEctRIicITy, MAGNETISM. On various Phenomena of Refraction through Semi-Lenses producing Anomalies, in the Illusion of Stereoscopic Images. By A. Cuaunpezt, F.R.S. The paper had for its object to explain the cause of the illusion of curvature given to pictures representing flat surfaces, when examined in the refracting or semilen- ticular stereoscope. The author showed that all vertical lines seen through prisms or semi-lenses are bent, presenting their concave side to the thin edge of the prism, and as the two photographic pictures are bent in the same manner and by the same cause, the inevitable result of their coalescence in the stereoscope is a concave sur- face produced by the necessity of converging the optic axes more to unite the ends and less to unite the centres of the two curved lines ; more convergence giving the illusion of nearer distance, and less convergence of further distance. The only means to avoid this defect is to examine the two pictures in order to employ the centre of the lenses, which do not bend straight lines; but as the centre does not refract laterally the two images, their coincidence cannot take place without placing the optical axis in such a position that they are nearly parallel, as if we were looking at the moon, or a very distant object. This isan operation not very easy at the first attempt, but which a little practice will teach us to perform. Persons capable of using such a stereoscope will see the pictures more perfect, and all objects in their natural shape.—Mr. Claudet presented to the Meeting a stereoscope made on this principle, and many of the members present could see perfectly well with it. The author explained the cause of another defect which is very often noticed in examining stereoscopic pictures, viz. that the subject seems in some cases to come out of the openings of the mountings, and in some others to recede from behind,—this last effect being more favourable and more artistic. Mr. Claudet recommended photographers when mounting their pictures to take care that the opening should have their correspondent vertical sides less distant than any two correspondent points of the first plane of the pictures, which could be easily done by means of a pair of compasses, measuring those respective distances. To illustrate the phenomenon of vertical lines, bent by prisms, forming by coalescence concave surfaces, Mr. Claudet stated that if holding in each hand one prism, the two prisms having their thin edges towards each other, we look at the window from the opposite end of the room, we see first two windows with their vertical lines 10 REPORT—1856. bent in contrary directions; but by inclining gradually the optical axes, we can converge them until the two images coalesce, and we see only one window; as soon as they coincide the lateral curvature of the vertical lines ceases, and they are bent projectively from back to front: we have then the illusion of a window concave towards the room, such as it would appear reflected by a concave mirror. On some Dichromatic Phenomena among Solutions, and the means of representing them. By J. H. Guapstont, PA.D., F.R.S. This paper was an extension of Sir John Herschel’s observations on dichromatism, that property whereby certain bodies appear of a different colour according to the quantity seen through. It depends generally on the less rapid absorption of the red ray as it penetrates a substance. A dichromatic solution was examined by placing it in a wedge-shaped glass-trough, held in such a position that a slit in a window- shutter was seen traversing the varying thicknesses of the liquid. The diversely coloured line of light thus produced was analysed by a prism; and the resulting spectrum was represented in a diagram by means of coloured chalks on black paper, the true position of the apparent colours being determined by the fixed lines of the spectrum. In this way the citrate and comenamate of iron, sulphate of indigo, litmus in various conditions, cochineal, and chromium, and cobalt salts were examined and represented. Among the more notable results were the following :—A base, such as chromic oxide, produces very nearly the same spectral image with whatever acid it may be combined, although the salts may appear very different in colour to the unaided eye. Citrate of iron appears green, brown, or red, according to the quantity seen through. It transmits the red ray most easily, then the orange, then the green, while it cuts off entirely the more refrangible half of the spectrum. Neutral litmus appears blue or red, according to the strength or depth of the solu- tion. Alkalies cause a great development of the blue ray; acids cause a like increase of the orange, while the minimum of luminosity is altered to a position much nearer the blue. SBoracic acid causes a development of the violet. Alkaline litmus was exhibited so strong that it appeared red, and slightly acid litmus so dilute that it looked bluish purple; indeed, on account of the easy transmissibility of the orange ray through an acid solution, the apparent paradox was maintained that a large amount of alkaline litmus is of a purer red than acid litmus itself. Another kind of dichromatism was examined, dependent not on the actual quantity of coloured material, but on the relative proportion of the solvent, and diagrams of the changing appearances of sulphocyanide of iron, of chloride of copper, and of chloride of cobalt were exhibited. On the Stratified Appearance of the Electrical Diseharge. By W. R. Grove, M.A., F.R.S. Mr. Grove communicated some additional facts connected with a phenomenon first observed and published by him in the ‘Philosophical Transactions’ for 1852, viz. the striated or stratified appearance in the electric discharge in rarefied gases and vapours, particularly that of phosphorus. M. Ruhmkorff, M. Quet, and Dr. Robinson had, subsequently to Mr. Grove, experimented on the subject. Nosa- tisfactory rationale of it has hitherto been given. Mr. Grove has, however, observed that the mode of breaking contact has a marked influence on the phenomenon, which would lead to the belief that it is due to the intermittent character of the discharges. If, for instance, the arm of thecontact-breaker be made to rest on aslight spring placed underneath it, the bands become narrower. If a single breach of contact be effected, most observers have remarked that the effect is still perceptible; but it is very diffi- cult to effect a single breach of contact. The fusion of the metals at the point of contact, with the vibration accompanying the movement, occasions a double or triple disruption. The best mode is to place two stout copper wires across each other, and with a firm hand draw one over the other, until the end of the former parts company with the Jatter ; when this is well done the striz are, in the majority of cases, not observed. Of all the substances which had been tried, the vapour of phosphorus succeeds best, and with this is seen a remarkable effect on the powder or smoke of allotropic phosphorus (which is always formed when the striz are bam T _. TRANSACTIONS OF THE SECTIONS. 11 observed): this smoke traverses from pole to pole, from the negative to the positive side, showing, unless there be some latent optical deception, a mechanical effect of the discharge under the circumstances.—The phenomenon was exhibited to the members of the Section in the committee-room, which had been darkened for the purpose. On the Law of Electrical and Magnetic Force. By Sir W. S. Harris, F.R.S. The author prefaced the exposition of the views he himself had adopted, after elaborate experimental research on the subject, by stating that the discovery of the beautiful and comprehensive law of universal gravitation by Newton had predisposed all physical inquirers to entertain the notion that every other foree associated with ordinary matter was subject toa similar law. The forces of electricity and magnetism were especially considered as coming under a like law, and a great variety of expe- rimental inquiries were instituted to verify the conjecture. Cavendish, after Gipinus, was certainly the first philosopher who investigated experimentally and threw light on this question. This appears by his celebrated paper in the ‘ Philosophical Trans- actions’ for 1772, and likewise by his unpublished manuscripts, which had descended to the Earl of Burlington, and had been placed by that nobleman in the hands of the author; and, he might add in passing, were open to the inspection of any inquirer engaged in these researches, and contained matter of the most importantkind. The author then pointed out several well-known and acknowledged truths in these sciences which were due to the researches of Cavendish. He then pointed out the influence which the researches of Coulomb had exercised on the universal philoso- phic world, particularly after the writings of the celebrated Poisson, Laplace, Biot. and others had given form and currency to his views and principles. Such a galaxy of eminent names, and so wide a reception of Coulomb’s theoretical views, the author considered to be calculated to discountenance and discourage much critical inquiry as to their soundness, and to immerse us ir a kind of philosophical ortho- doxy very unfavourable to a more complete knowledge of these unseen, yet astonishing powers of Nature which we daily experience. The author then went on to illustrate the law of the inverse square of the distance as relating to forces emanating from one central point and to other emanations from a centre, and to point out how far this might safely be relied upon as applicable to the electrical and magnetic forces of attraction and repulsion ; and stated that the object of the present communication, which the author submitted with all due diffidence, was to investigate the physical condition under which these forces manifest themselves,—what are the general laws of the operation of such forces,—how far we may safely consider them as central forces, such as gravity, or whether they are to be considered more.in the light of forces, operating between surfaces distinctive in their character and in their ordinary relations to common matter. He then pointed out one essentially distinctive cha- racter of these forces. In gravitation, the attracted body, as far as we can observe, remains in the same physical condition before and during all the changes of distance and force to which the bodies are naturally subjected. But in the phenomena of electrical and magnetic attraction and of repulsion, the very first step was that the body acted upon had its physical condition changed ; and this change again, by a kind of reflex influence, affected what had been the instant before the physical condition of the body producing the change; and thus, during the action and its changes, new physical conditions of both had to be investigated and taken into con= sideration, that is, if we wish truly to interpret the facts. The author then, with well-arranged apparatus, proceeded to illustrate, by some striking experiments, both electrical and magnetic, the truth and importance of these general views: he endea- voured to explain the peculiar electrical conditions under which the forces of elec- tricity and magnetism might be expected to vary in the inverse duplicate ratio of the distances, but which conditions being interfered with, other laws of force might become developed, as found by many eminent philosophers of the last century, dis- tinguished by their great skill in experimental physics. The author concluded by some observations on the use of the proof plane and the torsion balance, and showed with what great caution the proof plane should be applied as a means of deducing results to serve as data for mathematical analysis. rg REPORT—1856. On the Unequal Sensibility of the Foramen Centrale to Light of different Colours. By J. C. Maxwett. When observing the spectrum formed by looking at a long vertical slit through a simple prism, I noticed an elongated dark spot running up and down in the blue, and following the motion of the eye as it moved up and down the spectrum, but refusing to pass out of the blue into the other colours. It was plain that the spot belonged both to the eye and to the blue part of the spectrum. Theresult to which I have come is, that the appearance is due to the yellow spot on the retina, com- monly called the foramen Centrale of Soemmering. The most convenient method of observing the spot is by presenting to the eye in not too rapid succession, blue and yellow glasses, or, still better, allowing blue and yellow papers to revolve slowly before the eye. In this way the spot is seen in the blue. It fades rapidly, but is renewed every time the yellow comes in to relieve the effect of the blue. By using a Nicol’s prism along with this apparatus, the brushes of Haidinger are well seen in connexion with the spot, and the fact of the brushes being the spot analysed by po- larized light becomes evident. If we look steadily at an object behind a series of bright bars which move in front of it, we shall see a curious bending of the bars as they come up to the place of the yellow spot. The part which comes over the spot seems to start in advance of the rest of the. bar, and this would seem to indicate a greater rapidity of sensation at the yellow spot than in the surrounding retina. But I find the experiment difficult, and I hope for better results from more accurate observers. On a Method of Drawing the Theoretical Forms of Faraday’s Lines of Force without Calculation. By J.C. Maxwetu. The method applies more particularly to those cases in which the lines are entirely parallel to one plane, such as the lines of electric currents in a thin plate, or those round a system of parallel electric currents. In such cases, if we know the forms of the lines of force in any two cases, we may combine them by simple addition of the functions on which the equations of the lines depend. Thus the system of lines in a uniform magnetic field is a series of parallel straight lines at equal intervals, and that for an infinite straight electric current perpendicular to the paper is a series of concentric circles whose radii are in geometric progression. Having drawn these two sets of lines on two separate sheets of paper, and laid a third piece above, draw a third set of lines through the intersections of the first and second sets. This will be the system of lines in a uniform field disturbed by an electric current. The most interesting cases are those of uniform fields disturbed by a small magnet. If we draw a circle of any diameter with the magnet for centre, and join those points in which the circle cuts the lines of force, the straight lines so drawn will be parallel and equidistant; and it is easily shown that they represent the actual lines of force in a paramagnetic, diamagnetic, or crystallized body, according to the nature of the ori- ginal lines, the size of the circle, &c. No one can study Faraday’s researches without wishing to see the forms of the lines of force. This method, therefore, by which they may be easily drawn, is recommended to the notice of electrical students. On the Theory of Compound Colours with reference to Mixtures of Blue and Yellow Light. By J.C. Maxwestt. ~ When we mix together blue and yellow paint, we obtain green paint. This fact is well known to all who have ever handled colours; and it is universally admitted that blue and yellow make green. Red, yellow, and blue, being the primary colours among painters, green is regarded as a secondary colour, arising from the mixture of blue and yellow. Newton, however, found that the green of the spectrum was not the same thing as the mixture of two colours of the spectrum, for such a mixture could be separated by the prism, while the green of the spectrum resisted further de- composition. But still it was believed that yellow and blue would make a green, though not that of the spectrum As far as I am aware, the first experiment on the subject is that of M. Plateau, who, before 1819, made a disc with alternate sectors of prussian blue and gamboge, and observed that, when spinning, the resultant TRANSACTIONS OF THE SECTIONS. a8 tint was not green, but a neutral gray, inclining sometimes to yellow or blue, but never to green. Prof. J. D. Forbes of Edinburgh made similar experiments in 1849, with the same result. Prof. Helmholtz of Kénigsberg, to whom we owe the most complete investigation on visible colour, has given the true explanation of this phenomenon. The result of mixing two coloured powders is not by any means the same as mixing the beams of light which flow from each separately. In the latter case we receive all the light which comes either from the one powder or the other. In the former, much of the light coming from one powder falls on particles of the other, and we receive only that portion which has escaped absorption by one or other. Thus the light coming from a mixture of blue and yellow powder, consists partly of light coming directly from blue particles or yellow particles, and partly of light acted on by both blue and yellow particles. This latter light is green, since the blue stops the red, yellow, and orange, and the yellow stops the blue and violet. I have made experiments on the mixture of blue and yellow light—by rapid rotation, by combined reflexion and transmission, by viewing them out of focus, in stripes, at a great distance, by throwing the colours of the spectrum on a screen, and by receiving them into the eye directly; and I have arranged a portable apparatus by which any one may see the result of this or any other mixture of the colours of the spectrum. In all these cases blue and yellow do not make green. I have also made experiments on the mixture of coloured powders. Those which I used principally were “ mineral blue” (from copper) and “ chrome-yellow.’’ Other blue and yellow pigments gave curious results, but it was more difficult to make the mixtures, and the greens were less uniform in tint. The mixtures of these colours were made . by weight, and were painted on discs of paper, which were afterwards treated in the manner described in my paper “‘On Colour as perceived by the Eye,” in the ‘Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh,’ vol. xxi. part 2. The visible effect of the colour is estimated in terms of the standard-coloured papers :—ver- milion (V), ultramarine (U), and emerald-green (E). The accuracy of the results, and their significance, can be best understood by referring to the paper before mentioned. I shall denote mineral blue by B, and chrome-yellow by Y; and B; Y; means a mixture of three parts blue and five parts yellow. Given Colour. Standard Colours. Coefficient Wem e, */is of brightness. Bs OO: = Pease 7) ee 45 Se: =e ee AP ......... 37 Bg Y¥o-7 100.) => 4,7 LE 34 49 B;.. 3p) 100 =. 8 "'5 40 54 B, Y,,100 = 15 1 40 56 "Bee Ne ll 9 eee 4a... 05. G4 By Ye ssl0., = Soe WOT GL v6. eke 76 B, Y,,100 = 64-19 64 ......... 109 Yg ; 100- = 180 —27 124 .....0... 277 The columns V, U, E give the proportions of the standard colours which are equivalent to 100 of the given colour; and the sum of V, U, E gives a co- efficient, which gives a general idea of the brightness. It will be seen that the first admixture of yellow diminishes the brightness of the blue. The negative values of U indicate that a mixture of V, U,and E cannot be made equivalent to the given colour. The experiments from which these results were taken had the negative values transferred to the other side of the equation. They were all made by means of the colour-top, and were verified by repetition at different times. It may be necessary to remark, in conclusion, with reference to the mode of registering visible colours in terms of three arbitrary standard colours, that it proceeds upon that theory of three primary elements in the sensation of colour, which treats the investigation of the laws of visible colour as a branch of human physiology, incapable of being deduced from the laws of light itself, as set forth in physical optics. It takes advan- tage of the methods of optics to study vision itself ; and its appeal is not to physical principles, but to our consciousness of our own sensations. 14 REPORT—1856. On the Form of Lightning. By Jamzs NasmytH, F.R.AS. Mr. Nasmyth said, that, observing that the form usually attributed to lightning by painters and in works of art was very different from that which he had observed as exhibited in nature, he was induced to call attention to it. He believed the error of the artists originated in the form given to the thunderbolt in the hand of Jupiter as sculp- tured by the early Greeks. — The form of lightning as exhibited in nature was simply an irregular curved line, most generally shoot- ing from the earth below to the cloud above, and often continued from the cloud downwards againtoanother distant part of the earth. This appearance, he con- ceived, was the result of the rapid passage of a point of light which constituted the true lightning, leaving on the eye the impression of the path it traced. In very intense lightning, he had also observed offshoots of an arborescent form to pro- ceed, at several places, from the primary track of the flash. But in no instance among the many thunder- storms whose progress he had most attentively watch- ed, had he ever observed such forms of lightning as that usually represented in works of art; in all such, the artists invariably adopt a conventional form, name- ly, that of a zigzag com- bination of straight lines as indicated in fig. 1; whereas the true natural form of a primitive flash of lightning appears to Mr. Nasmyth to be more correctly repre- sented by an _ intensely crooked line, as indicated in fig. 2; and on several occasions he has observed it to assume the forked or branched form indicated in fig. 3; but, as before said, never in the zigzag dovetail of fig. 1. Mr. Nasmyth also remarked, that in the majority of cases he had observed that the course of the flash was from the earth upwards towards the heavens. He used the term “primitive flash” to distinguish it from “ sheet lightning,” which is generally the reflexion on light diffused from a hidden primitive flash. » TRANSACTIONS OF THE SECTIONS. 15 On Fresnel’s Formule for Reflected and Refracted Light. By the Rev. BADEN Powett, M.A., F.R.S. &c., Savilian Professor of Geometry, Oxford. The author having recently published in the ‘Philosophical Magazine’ (July and August 1856) a detailed review of the various questions respecting the demonstration of these well-known and important formule, and their applications, is anxious to put before the Section a short summary of the whole case, and to elicit, if possible, a more complete discussion of the questions arising out of it, more especially as some views recently taken would seem calculated to set aside the whole reasoning hitherto adopted on the subject, and to involve the whole application and interpretation of the formulas in doubt. The whole of these investigations is founded on the following principles :-— (1) The law of vis viva (m and m, being the simultaneously vibrating masses of zther without and within the medium; 4, !, h, the amplitudes of the incident, re- flected, and refracted rays), m(h?—h")=m,h?. (2) The law of equivalent vibrations as given by Maccullagh (é and r being the angles of incidence and refraction, I the plane of incidence), h+i'=h, vibrations perpendicular to I. Cosa ty (3) h+h'=h, —; vibrations parallel to 1. (4) Another form of this law, the second case of which was adopted by Fresnel , =) ee eRe Bane perpendicular to I. cosr (5) h—W'=h cosgctttte -. parallel to I. (6) Maccullagh’s hypothesis of equal densities, giving m _ sin 2% m, sin 27° (7) Fresnel’s hypothesis of increased density in the more refractive medium, giving m __sinrcosié m, sinicosr (8) Maccullagh’s hypothesis of vibrations parallel to the plane of polarization. (9) Fresnel’s hypothesis of vibrations perpendicular to the plane of polarization. From these assumptions are directly deduced formulas whose general types are h' sin @—r) he => sin G7)” - eo . ."_ ee Kk’ tan (i—r) ktanG@+rey° oc ot tt tt ®D whence h, and k, follow from (1) by (2), (3), or (4), (5). Also k! becomes = 0, and changes sign at the incidence of polarization. The several hypotheses give these formulas with different signs, and consequently with different values of h, k,. (A) Combining Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, gives (w)...... thand +2'...... parallel to I (8) ...... akand +é'...... perpendicular (B) Combining Nos. 1, 2, 3, 7, 9, gives (@) ...... +hand —h’..,... perpendicular—Fresnel. (8) ...... +kand +k ...... parallel. (C) Combining Nos. 1, 4, 5, 7, 9, gives (@) «eeeee +hand +A'.,.... perpendicular—Fresnel. (8B) «+40. hand +k',,..., parallel. (H) } Maccullagh. 16 REPORT—1856. Thus, proceeding in all cases on the principle of vis viva, and that of the mecha- nical equivalence of the incident, reflected, and refracted vibrations,—on the hypo- thesis of equal densities,—of vibrations parallel to the plane of polarization, —and of Maccullagh’s law of equivalence, we have Maccullagh’s formulas (H) and (K). (A.) - On the hypothesis of increased density,—of vibrations perpendicular to polariza- tion, and Maccullagh’s law of equivalence, we have Fresnel’s formula (H), but a for- mula (K) differing from Fresnel’s in the signs. (B.) On the same hypotheses, but taking that form of the law of equivalence which Fresnel adopted in one instance, we have (H) differing from Fresnel’s in sign, and (K) the same as Fresnel’s. (C.) : The theoretical principles seem as yet to furnish no guide to a choice between these assumptions ; but the results of experiment must be appealed to. The only known experimental results which bear upon the question between these several formule and the hypotheses on which they are deduced, are— I. Professor Stokes’s result of the change of plane of vibration and polarization in diffraction, which sets aside absolutely the hypothesis of vibrations parallel to the plane of polarization, and by consequence Maccullagh’s formule (A), and the hypo- thesis of equal densities on which they are founded. II. The result of Arago, Fresnel and Brewster, as to the change of plane of polari- zation by reflexion; the new plane being, at small incidences, on the opposite side of the plane of incidence to that of original polarization; while after passing the inci- dence of complete polarization it comes to the same side. This requires formulas which give /! and k’ of opposite signs at small incidences, and of the same sign after the polarizing incidence, which is only the case with Fresnel’s original formulas (B, «) and (C, 8), and excludes those on the other hypotheses, (B, 8), and (C, a). III. The result of Dr. Lloyd from his interference fringes, where at the extreme oblique incidence the incident and reflected ray are in opposite phases ; this requires both h! and h, as also k and k', to be of opposite signs at great incidences, which agrees only with Fresnel’s original formulas (B, «) and (C, f). But these inferences assume the correctness of the reasoning on the symbols as hitherto adopted, both by the original investigators referred to, and also in the ele- mentary treatises of Mr. Airy and others. Some suggestions lately made in order to bring the other formulas into accordance with the facts, can only do so by setting aside the validity of the entire reasoning just referred to. These suggestions turn on the geometrical change in position which (in the case of vibrations parallel to the plane of incidence) the directions of the vibrations undergo, with the change of posi- tion of the ray, in passing from small to large incidences, so that if they accord in the first instance they will (from this cause alone) be opposed in the second. On the other hand, the original formulas of Fresnel are still deficient in respect to their direct deduction from any one of the above-mentioned hypotheses ; they will only follow from partially adopting two of them, viz. (B, «) and (C, §). A suggestion for deducing them on another principle has been since made by the author in the ‘ Philosophical Magazine,’ October 1856. On a Modification of the Maynooth Cast Iron Battery. By W. Symons. A recent paper by Professor Callan in the ‘ Philosophical Magazine’ on a cast iron battery which he states to be equal in power to Grove’s nitric acid battery, will probably induce many persons to adopt this very cheap but cumbrous metal, The battery now exhibited is an improvement on one published by the author in the ‘ Phar- maceutical Journal’ for February 1853, and its recommendations are compactness, as it can be moved as one mass; and simplicity and economy of construction, as one wooden screw is sufficient for 10 or 12 pairs. The construction was minutely de- scribed, and two arrangements of plates were shown, one adapted for a Wedgewood trough with cast-iron plates on each side of each zinc plate, and the other fitted up in a similar manner to a battery described by Martyn Roberts,-in-which he proposes to use both sides of both plates: such an arrangement may perhaps be advantageous where the resistance is very smal], but from a few experiments with the battery shown, it appears to be far from economical where the resistance is equal to that required for the decomposition of water. Six pairs on each plan were fitted up. with similar plates TRANSACTIONS OF THE SECTIONS. 17 and with acid of the same strength, but the arrangement in which the pairs were isolated in a Wedgewood trough, liberated three or four times the amount of gases in the voltameter, as the arrangement on Martyn Roberts’ plan. The battery, when arranged as the author proposes, will be one compact mass, which can be readily moved in and out of the cells; this will probably more than compensate for the loss by the action of the acid on the iron surface not exposed to the zinc, as the battery need only be kept in the acid when actually at work; and this loss may perhaps be further prevented by covering the outside of the iron with a resinous mixture; but should the cast-iron cell suggested by Callan be preferred, they can be easily cast with the addition required in this arrangement. As cast-iron plates 5 inches square can be procured for 2d. each at any foundry, and no binding screws are required, this battery will probably be found much cheaper and quite as efficient as any published, and especially adapted for experimentalists who make their own apparatus, who will know how to appreciate the cheap and easy method for making the connexions. A more detailed account, with an engraving of this battery, may be seen in the ‘Chemist ’ for November 1856. On Dellman’s Method of observing Atmospheric Electricity. By Professor WiLu1aM Tuomson, M.Z., F.R.S., Glasgow. Extract from letter addressed to General Sabine :—“ During my recent visit to Creuznach I became acquainted with Mr. Dellman of that place, who makes meteoro- logical, chiefly electrical, observations for the Prussian Government, and I had oppor- tunities of witnessing his method of electrical observation. Itconsists in using a copper ball about 6 inches diameter, to carry away an electrical effect from a position about two yards above the roof of his house, depending simply on the atmospheric ‘ poten- tial’ at the point to which the centre of the ball is sent ; and it is exactly the method of the ‘carrier ball’ by which Faraday investigated the atmospheric potential in the neighbourhood of a rubbed stick of shell-lac, and other electrified bodies (‘ Experi- mental Researches,’ Series XI. 1837). The whole process only differs from Faraday’s in not employing the carrier ball directly, as the repeller in a Coulomb-electrometer, but putting it into communication with the conductor of a separate electrometer of peculiar construction. The collecting part of the apparatus is so simple and easily managed that an amateur could, for a few shillings, set one up on his own house, if at all suitable as regards roof and windows ; and, if provided with a suitable electro- meter, could make observations in atmospheric electricity with as much ease as ther- mometric or barometric observations. The electrometer used by Mr. Dellman is of his own construction (described in Poggendorff’s ‘ Annalen,’ 1853, vol. Ixxxix., also vol. Ixxxv.), and it appears to be very satisfactory in its operation. It is, I believe, essentially more accurate and sensitive than Peltier’s, and it hasa great advantage in affording a verveasy and exact method for reducing its indications to absolute measure. I was much struck with the simplicity and excellence of Mr. Dellman’s whole system of observation on atmospheric electricity; and it has occurred to me that the Kew Com- mittee might be disposed to adopt it, if determined to carry out electrical observations. _ When I told Mr. Dellman that I intended to make a suggestion to this effect, he at once offered to have an electrometer, if desired, made under his own care. 1 wish also to } suggest two other modes of observing atmospheric electricity which have occurred to me, as possessing each of them some advantages over any of the systems hitherto fol- lowed. In one of these I propose to have an uninsulated cylindrical iron funnel, about 7 inches diameter, fixed to a height of two or three yards above the highest part of the building, and a light moveable continuation (like the telescope funnel of a steamer) of a yard and a half or two yards more, which can be let down or pushed up at pleasure. Insulated by supports at the top of the fixed part of the funnel, I would have a metal stem carrying a ball like Dellman’s, standing to such a height that it can be covered by a hinged lid on the top of the moveable joint of the funnel, _ when the latter is pushed up; and a fine wire fixed to the lower end of the insulated ‘stem, and hanging down, in the axis of the funnel to the electrometer. When the apparatus is not in use, the moveable joint would be kept at the highest, with its lid _ down, and the ball uninsulated. To make an observation, the ball would be insu- ast the lid turned up rapidly, and the moveable joint carrying it let down, an _ 1856. 2 \ 18 REPORT—1856. ; 7 operation which could be effected in a few seconds by a suitable mechanism, The electrometer would immediately indicate an inductive electrification simply propor- tional to the atmospheric potential at the position occupied by the centre of the ball, and would continue to indicate at each instant the actual atmospheric potential, however variable, as long as no sensible electrification or diselectrification has taken place through imperfect insulation or convection by particles of dust or currents of air (probably for a quarter or a half of an hour, when care is taken to keep the insulation in good order). This might be the best form of apparatus for making observations in the presence of thunder-clouds. But I think the best possible plan in most respects, if it turns out to be practicable, of which I can have little doubt, will be to use, instead of the ordinary fixed insulated conductor with a point, a fixed conductor of similar form, but hollow, and containing within itself an apparatus for making hydrogen, and blowing small soap-bubbles of that gas from a fine tube ter- minating as nearly as may be in a point, at a height of a few yards in the air. With this arrangement the insulation would only need to be good enough to make the loss of a charge by conduction very slow in comparison with convective loss by the bubbles; so that it would be easy to secure against any sensible error from defective insulation. If 100 or 200 bubbles, each +, inch in diameter, are blown from the top of the conductor per minute, the electrical potential in its interior will very rapidly. follow variations of the atmospheric potential, and would be at any instant the same as the mean for the atmosphere during some period of a few minutes preceding. The action of a simple point is (as, I suppose, is generally admitted) essentially unsatisfactory, and as nearly as possible nugatory in its results. I am not aware how flame has been found to succeed, but I should think not well in the circumstances of atmospheric observations, in which it is essentially closed in a lantern; and I cannot see on any theoretical ground how its action in these circumstances can be perfect, like that of the soap-bubbles. I intend to make a trial of the practicability of blowing the bubbles ; and if it proves satisfactory, there cannot be a doubt of the availability of the system for atmospheric observations.” [Addition, Feb. 1857.]|—The author has now made various trials on the last-men- tioned part of his proposal, and he has not succeeded in finding any practicable self- regulating apparatus for blowing bubbles and detaching them one by one from the tube. He has seen reason to doubt whether it will be possible to get bubbles so small as those proposed above, to rise at all; but he has not been led to believe that, if it is thought worth while to try, it will be found impracticable to construct a self-acting- apparatus which will regularly blow and discharge separately, bubbles of considerably larger diameter, and so to secure the advantages mentioned, although with a pro- portionately larger consumption of the gas. ; On the other hand, he finds that, by the aid of an extremely sensitive electrometer which he has recently constructed, he will be able, in all probability with great ease and at very small cost, to bring into practice the first of his two plans, constructed on a considerably smaller scale as regards height than proposed in the preceding statement. } ; On Printing Photographs, with suggestions for introducing Clouds and Artistic Effects. By E. Vivian, M.A. The object of this paper was to point out the deficiencies in the chiaroscuro of photographic pictures, occasioned by the discrepancy between the actinic and the visual ray, and also the importance of introducing artistic effects in accordance with the laws of composition. The former of these is well known, yellow being the focus of light in the scale or colour, whilst it is the darkest in the photographic image, the greatest intensity of chemical action in the spectrum being in the violet, and even beyond the range of light. The defects of composition in ordinary nature are not so generally admitted, but, to the artist’s eye, few scenes are capable of producing a good picture, without, at least, the concentration and balance of light and shadow, which are only seen under rare and peculiarly favourable circumstances. Attention to this latter point is the more necessary in most photographic pictures from their reduced size, which requires them to be viewed at a distance from the eye, much beyond the technical . TRANSACTIONS OF THE SECTIONS. 19 “distance of the picture,” the rays thus entering the retina from all parts at nearly the same angle, instead of those from the centre being full and direct, and those from the extremities weakened by obliquity, as would be the case if the picture were the size of life. The remedy proposed was the employment of a second artificial negative, similar to the tint stone in double lithography. In preparing this, a sheet of transparent tracing paper is laid upon the original photograph, and all those portions which are to form the high lights are stopped out with opake colour, the clouds being formed with washes by a camel-hair brush, and the fine tracery of architecture, &c. with a reed pen or crowquill. Whilst the positive impression is still sensitive, this tint paper is to be accurately fitted on, either by the eye, or points in the frame, and exposed again to the light, until flat tones of the requisite depth are produced. The sky may be graduated by moving a shade over the surface, allowing the horizon to be least exposed, the effect of which is to produce the utmost delicacy in the force of the clouds as they recede in the perspective, however rudely drawn. A still more per- fect method is’ to commence with a good negative photograph of’ natural clouds, proceeding as before with the details of the picture. The first object should be to throw a flat tint over all those portions which, from being blue, have printed too light, as the sky, slate roofs, and all polished surfaces, as water, leaves of evergreens, &c., which reflect the blue of the sky. This alone will often produce a pleasing picture from a very unsatisfactory negative, light objects relieved by a dark sky, and the deep tones of water, especially in sea pieces, being amongst the most effective objects in nature, but which are quite lost in ordinary photography. . The effect must be left to the skill of the artist, shadows of clouds, with the toning down of obtrusive or offensive features being amongst the most obvious means employed to improve the composition, without interfering with the truth of the original outlines. The most powerful effects of moonlight, sunrise, or sunset may thus be produced, with reflexions in still water, or the gleams and ripple of a breeze ; the foam and sharp lines of a cataract may, by stopping out high lights on the original negative, be also substituted for the dull mass which ordinarily repre- sents falling water. The difficulty of reversing the lights of the clouds by using dark colour, may, if preferred, be avoided by substituting Chinese white tinged with yellow, the trans- parent paper being laid upon the dark sky of the negative. A tint paper thus produced may be used for any number of impressions, and, if the details of the picture are satisfactory, skies alone may be adapted to many different negatives, especially if drawn of more than the requisite extent, so as to apply such portion as is suitable to the composition of each picture. Many other suggestions were offered, such as inverting the negative to produce reflexions, when taken from the level of the water, the introduction of foregrounds, cattle, &c., by using both the object and the matrix from which it was cut, so that the lines should exactly coincide. , Methods were also shown by which the printing of parts of a photograph may be retarded so as to bring up the more opake portions. The most effectual of these was to attach a sheet of transparent tracing paper over the back of the negative and to stump over the weaker parts, so as when seen by transmitted light the whole should be in due gradation. The dispersion of ray through the thickness of the glass is found sufficient to prevent any trace of this artificial shading. With paper negatives the same result may also be produced by _partial waxing. On the Construction and Use of an Instrument for determining the Value of Intermittent or Alternating Electric Currents for purposes of Practical Telegraphy. By WitpmMan WHITEHOUSE. In the prosecution of some electrical studies, requiring an estimate of the values of different magneto-electric currents, Mr. Whitehouse found that the ordinary gal- vanometer was totally inadequate to indicate the required results. However suitable that instrument might be for a continuous or voltaic current, and within a very limited range, yet the problem before him involved the numerical estimate of currents of the widest range and of the shortest duration. Q%* 20 REPORT—1856. It therefore occurred to Mr. Whitehouse that the amount of magnetic force deve- loped by the current in its passage through fine wire surrounding an electro-magnet, seemed to offer the most ready, and at the same time the most practical mode of attaining the object ;—an idea which received confirmation from the fact, that when- ever such currents were used in telegraphy, they were always received upon and made to actuate electro-magnets. ; He therefore wound an electro-magnet with fine wire, placing its poles very near to a keeper of soft iron, poised in the manner of a lever steelyard and loaded to any given weight; the current either lifted or did not lift the given weight, and this was the test of what Mr. W. proposed to call its ‘ value ” in telegraphy. So delicate was this test that he had been able to determine accurately the “ value,” as it raay be termed, of a current too feeble in its energy, and too brief in its dura- tion, to give the slightest indication of its presence on one of the most sensitive “detectors” usually employed in critical telegraphic operations. He had actually weighed with accuracy a current whose force was represented by 42,ths of a grain; and on the other hand currents with a wide range of quantity and intensity, and of varying amounts of force up to no less than 600,000 grains. Mr. Whitehouse then described in detail the principle and construction of the instrument. The reels of fine wire were so arranged as to be easily removeable, in order to substitute others carrying wire of different gauges, or even without this change any two reels might be either joined up in series for intensity or in parallel currents, which thereby halved the length while it doubled the area of conducting wire. Mr, Whitehouse then illustrated its uses and practical capabilities, Ist. It had contributed valuable aid in the analysis of several forms of induction coils, varying in size and construction ; it not only estimated in grains the value of each secondary current thus produced, but approximatively determined their relative amounts of quantity and intensity, by noting the arrangement of wire which gave the best result. 2ndly. It speedily indicated the advantage of using induction coils in pairs rather than singly, under which head some surprising results were given, the near presence of an unexcited. iron bar augmenting the value of the current in the coil under observation. 3rdly. It would evidently afford the means of practically determining a point of considerable interest in the comparison of voltaic and magneto-electric currents, to the solution of which Mr. Whitehouse had pledged himself: this was to ascer- tain the economico-practical limits of battery series; because the penetrating power or intensity and value of currents so produced might hereby be accurately compared with the force of coil currents educed from batteries of much simpler and less wasteful construction, consisting only of one or two elements, instead of hundreds. Athly. It had, conjointly with the use of a pendulum and automatic recording arrangements, led to the production of a series of curve diagrams, representing a minute analysis of any given current, denoting its force, however variable, in the several fractions of a second of time. 5thly. It had enabled Mr, Whitehouse, with the assistance and cooperation of Mr. Bright of the Magnetic Company, after weighing the value, upon short circuit, of the currents from many of their magneto-instruments, so as to determine their average value, to weigh the same currents after working through various distances, from 40 to 320 miles of subterranean and submarine wires; thus showing with certainty and minute accuracy the loss due to the combined influence of resistance, induction and defective insulation. Lastly. It had done good service in working out the laws relating to induction in submarine circuits ; and some striking illustrations were given in conclusion, Working upon a 498 mile length of very perfectly insulated cable-wire, the phe- nomena of induction and retardation, of charge and discharge, as originally described by Faraday, were exhibited in a remarkable manner. A current, lifting 18,000 grains on short circuit, was sent into the long wire, the further end of which was insulated; but on cutting off the battery, and instantly discharging the wire to earth through the same instrument, it gave a lifting power of 60,000 grains; so strikingly cumulative was the tendency of this gigantic Leyden TRANSACTIONS OF THE SECTIONS. 21 jar. While, if both ends of the wire were discharged to earth simultaneously, a lift of 96,000 grains was obtained, thus realizing as a return, more than five times the amount which the battery gave on short circuit. Again: A feeble magneto-current of only 4 grains was adequate to work a telegraphic receiving instrument, a sensitive galvanometer being placed in the same circuit; but this latter gave most uncertain indications of value; its unsteady movements ranged wider with slow and feeble currents, and indicated a lesser value for stronger currents, which followed more rapidly in succession, all which however were accurately pourtrayed by the new instrument. Again: A pair of induction coils, excited by six small Smee cells, gave 27,000 grains; the mere addition of a soft iron armature at one end augmented this to 43,000, while a similar one at the other end increased the current’s value up to 47,500. Mr. Whitehouse called it a ‘‘ Magneto-electrometer”’ from its special adaptation to the measurement of magneto-electric currents, while the terms galvanometer, voltameter, and electrometer sufficiently indicated for these instruments their con- nexion with other forms of electricity. The desirability of a definite and common standard of comparison was insisted on, and Mr. Whitehouse promised to set aside for this special use the most accurately finished and perfect instrument he could obtain, for the free use of any fellow- labourers in the same field. The Law of the Squares—is it applicable or not to the Transmission of Signals in Submarine Circuits? By WitpMaANn WHITEHOUSE. Referring to the proceedings of this Section last year at Glasgow, the author quoted Prof.W.Thomson’s paper on this subject, where he stated ‘‘ that a part of the theory communicated by himself to the Royal Society last May, and published in the ‘ Proceedings,’ shows that a wire of six times the length of the Varna and Bala- klava wire, if of the same lateral dimensions, would give thirty-six times the retar- dation, and thirty-six times the slowness of action. If the distinctness of utterance and rapidity of action practicable with the Varna and Balaklava wire are only such as not to be inconvenient, it would be necessary to have a wire of six times the diameter ; or better, thirty-six wires of the same dimensions; or a larger number of small wires twisted together, under a gutta-percha covering, to give tolerably convenient action by a submarine cable of six times the length.’”” The author then stated, that circumstances had enabled him to make very recently a !ong series of experiments upon this point, the results of which he proposed to lay before the Section ; adding, that an opportunity still existed for repeating these experiments upon a portion of cable to which he could obtain access, and that he was ready to show them before a committee of this Section in London, if the important nature of the subject should seem to render such a course desirable. Although the subject of submarine telegraphy had many points of the highest importance requiring investi- _ gation, and to the consideration of which he had been devoting himself recently, Mr. Whitehouse proposed to confine his remarks on this occasion to the one point indicated in the title, inasmuch as the decision of that one, either favourably or otherwise, would have, on the one hand, the effect of putting a very narrow limit to our progress in telegraphy, or, on the other, of leaving it the most ample scope. He drew a distinction between the mere transmisssion of a current across the Atlantic (the possibility of which he supposed everybody must admit) and the effectual working of a telegraph at a speed sufficient for ‘commercial success ; ”’ and we gathered from his remarks that there were those ready to embark in the undertaking as soon as the possibility of ‘‘ commercial success’’ was demonstrated. The author then gave a description of the apparatus employed in his researches, of the manner in which the experiments were conducted, and, lastly, of the results obtained. The wires upon which the experiments were made were copper, of No. 16 gauge, very perfectly insulated with gutta percha—spun into two cables, con- taining three wires of equal length (83 miles), covered with iron wires and coiled in a large tank in full contact with moist earth, but not submerged. The two cables ‘were subsequently joined together, making a length of 166 miles of cable, containing three wires. In addition to this, in some of the latest experiments he had also the 22 REPORT—1856. advantage of another length of cable, giving with the above, an aggregate of 1020 miles. The instruments, one of which was exhibited, seemed to be of great delicacy, capable of the utmost nicety of adjustment and particularly free from sources of error, The records were all made automatically, by electro-chemical decomposition, on chemi- cally prepared paper. The observations of different distances recorded themselves upon the same slip of paper; thus, 0, 83, and249 miles were imprinted upon one paper, 0,83, 498 miles upon another slip, 0, 249, 498 upon another, and 0, 535, 1020 upon another. Thus by the juxtaposition of the several simultaneous records on each slip, as well as by the comparison of one slip with another, the author has been enabled to show most convincingly that the law of the squares is not the law which governs the transmission of signals in submarine circuits. Mr. Whitehouse showed next, by reference to published experiments of Faraday’s and Wheatstone’s (Philo- sophical Magazine, July, 1855), that the effect of the iron covering with which the cable was surrounded was, electrically speaking, identical with that which would have resulted from submerging the wire, and that the results of the experiments could not on that point be deemed otherwise than reliable. The author next addressed himself to the objections raised against conclusions drawn from experi- ments in “Multiple” cables. Faraday had experimented, he said, upon wires laid in close juxtaposition, and with reliable results; but an appeal was made to direct experiment, and the amount of induction from wire to wire was weighed, and proved to be as one to ten thousand, and it was found impossible to vary the amount of retardation by any variation in the arrangement of the wires. Testimony also on this point was not wanting. The Director of the Black Sea Telegraph, Lieut.- Col. Biddulph, was in England, and present at many of the experiments. He con- firmed our author’s view, adding, ‘‘ that there was quite as much induction and embarrassment of instruments in this cable as he had met with in the Black Sea line.” The author considers it therefore proved, ‘‘ that experiments upon such a cable, fairly and cautiously conducted, may be regarded as real practical tests, and the results obtained as a fair sample of what will ultimately be found to hold good practically in lines laid out in ewtenso. At the head of each column in the annexed Table is stated the number of observations upon which the result given was com- puted,—every observation being rejected on which there could fall a suspicion of carelessness, inaccuracy, or uncertainty as to the precise conditions; and, on the other hand, every one which was retained being carefully measured to the hundredth part of a second. This Table is subject to correction, for variation in the state of the battery employed, just as the barometrical observations are subject to correction for temperature. Of this variation as a source of error I am quite aware, but I am not yet in possession of facts enough to supply me with the exact amount of cor- rection required. I prefer, therefore, to let the results stand without correction. Amount of Retardation observed at various distances. Voltaic Current. Time stated in parts of a Second. . Mean of 550 | Mean of 110 |Mean of 1840}/Mean of 1960) Mean of 120 simultaneous observations. | observations. | observations. | observations. observations. 83 miles. 166 miles. 249 miles. 498 miles. 535 miles. | 1020 miles. 08 “14 | 36 “79 “74 1:42 ‘ « Now it needs no long examination of this Table to find that we have the retar- dation following an increasing ratio, that increase being very little beyond the simple arithmetical ratio. I am quite prepared to admit the possibility of an amount of error having crept into these figures, in spite of my precautions ; indeed, I have on that account been anxious to multiply observations in order to obtain most trust- worthy results. But I cannot admit the possibility of error having accumulated to such an extent as to entirely overlay and conceal the operation of the law of the squares, if in reality that law had any bearing on the results. Taking 83 miles as our unit of distance, we have a series of 1, 2, 3,6, and 12. Taking 166 miles as our unit, we have then a series of 1, 3, and 6. Taking 249 miles, we have still a series of 1, 2, and 4,,;in very long distances. Yet even under these circumstances, and with these facilities, I cannot find a trace of the operation of that law.”? The EE fi aca iil TRANSACTIONS OF THE SECTIONS. 23 author then examined the evidence of the law of the squares, as shown by the value of a current taken in submarine or subterranean wires at different distances from the generator thereof, which he showed were strongly corroborative of the previous results. He next examined the question of the size of the conducting wire; and he had the opportunity of testing the application of the law, as enunciated by Prof. Thomson last year. The results, far from confirming the law, are strikingly opposed to it. The fact of trebling the size of the conductor augmented the amount of retardation to nearly double that observed in the single wire. The author, however, looked for the eaperimentum crucis in the limit to the rapidity and distinctness of utterance attainable in the relative distances of 500 and 1020 miles. 350 and 270 were the actual number of distinct signals recorded in equal times through thgse two lengths respectively. These figures have no relation to the squares of the distance. | ** Now, if the law of the squares be held to be good in its application to submarine circuits, and if the deductions as to the necessary size of the wire, based upon that law, can be proved to be valid also, we are driven to the inevitable conclusion that submarine cables of certain length to be successful must be constructed in accord- ance with these principles. And what does this involve? In the case of the Transatlantic line, whose estimated length will be no less than 2500 miles, it would necessitate the use, for a single conductor only, of a cable so large and ponderous, as that probably no ship except Mr. Scott Russell’s leviathian could carry it,—so unwieldy in the manufacture, that its perfect insulation would be a matter almost of practical impossibility,—and so expensive, from the amount of materials employed, and the very laborious and critical nature of the processes required in making and laying it out, that the thing would be abandoned as being practically and commer- cially impossible, If, on the other hand, the law of the squares be proved to be inapplicable to the transmission of signals by submarine wires, whether with refe- rence to the amount of retardation observable in them, the rapidity of utterance to be obtained, or the size of conductor required for the purpose, then we may shortly expect to see a cable not much exceeding one ton per mile, containing three, four or five conductors, stretched from shore to shore, and uniting us to our Transatlantic brethren, at an expense of less than one-fourth that of the large one above men- tioned, able to carry four or five times the number of messages, and therefore yielding about twenty times as much return in proportion to the outlay. And what, I may be asked, is the general conclusion to be drawn as the result of this investigation of the law of the squares applied to submarine circuits? In all honesty, I am bound to answer, that I believe nature knows no such application of that law; and I can only regard it as a fiction of the schools, a forced and violent adaptation of a prin- ciple in Physics, good and true under other circumstances, but misapplied here.” Astronomy, Metrors, WavEs. On the Tides of Nova Scotia. _ By the Rev. Professor Cuzvarurer, B.D., F.R.A.S. The observations to which reference is made were taken by a tide-gauge fixed upon a wharf at the north end of the naval yard at Halifax. The tides there are small in amount, the spring tides rising from 63 to 9 feet at Halifax, and 8 feet at Sambro Isle, twelve miles south of that place. The tides themselves appear to be quite regular ; but in addition to the ordinary tide-wave there occurs a series of undula- tions succeeding each other at intervals of twenty minutes or half an hour, the difference of elevation and depression rarely exceeding 6 inches, and being usually much less. They are more perceptible near low water; but occur at all times of tide, and are very distinctly marked upon the curve traced by the self-acting tide- gauge. The question to be considered is, what is the cause of these small waves? 1. They do not arise from any influence which the casual swell of the sea might exercise upon the tide-guage: for the rise and fall of one of these waves very seldom takes less time than a quarter of an hour, and often requires half an hour, 24 ' REPORT—1856. or even three-quarters of an hour. 2. They do not arise from undulatory motion in the whole waters of the harbour. In order to examine this question, Mr. Edgcumbe Chevallier, the storekeeper in Halifax Dockyard, went to Sambro, ten or twelve miles south of Halifax, and entirely clear of the harbour, and erected upon Power Island a temporary gauge, with which he took the height of the water every five minutes for the whole day. Having laid off the results in a form similar to that employed with the fixed tide-gauge at Halifax, it was found that every irregularity at Halifax was preceded ten or fifteen minutes by a larger irregularity at Sambro. These observations show that the irregular waves do not arise from the peculiar form of the harbour at Halifax. 3. At about sixty miles eastward from Halifax, outside Sable dsland, the Gulf-stream runs in nearly a north-eastern direction with consider- able velocity ; and between Sable Island and the land a counter-current runs nearly in a south-western direction. One of these currents would elevate the surface of the sea near the middle of the currents; and such an elevation of the surface over which the tide-wave is propagated might give rise to undulations similar to those observed. I am informed, however, that the undulations in question are observed on the western side of Nova Scotia, to which any effect of those two currents could not extend. 4. Although the tides at Halifax and on the neighbouring coast are small, that part of the ocean is near the indraught of the Bay of Fundy, where the peculiar form of the coast and its position with reference to the great tide-wave of the Atlantic give rise to a local tide of excessive magnitude. Such a tide, espe- cially when reverberated from coast to coast in a comparatively narrow inlet, might not improbably give rise to perceptible undulations in a neighbouring part of the sea. If this be the cause, it might be expected that a similar effect should be noticed where a tide of the like nature takes place. The Bay of Avranches is a locality of this kind, and the island of Jersey appeared to be a place where any undulations of the tide might probably be noticed. The extreme difference between high and low water at St. Helier’s is 42 feet, and the difference of height of the mean high and low water is 36 feet. On inquiry, I find that about ten years since a tide-guage was fixed at St. Helier’s, but observed only at high water, when irregularities were observed of the same kind as those noticed at Halifax. This seems to give probability to the opinion that the irregularities observed in the tide at Fialifax may be connected with the unusual tides in the Bay of Fundy. But whether they arise from this source, or are to be traced to some great reciprocating motion to which the waters of the Atlantic may be subject, the pheenomenon deserves to be studied, as likely to lead to a more extended knowledge of the hydrodynamical conditions of our globe. Working Model of a Machine for polishing Specula for Reflecting Telescopes and Lenses. By Ricuarp Greene, M.D. The polishing machine, the model of which I have now the honour of laying before the British Association, scarcely deserves the name of an invention, inasmuch as the public have for some years been in possession of a very beautiful machine, invented by William Lassell, Esq. of Liverpool, and most ably constructed by my very talented friend James Nasmyth, Esq. of Patricroft foundry. It will no doubt occur to most persons acquainted with the very superior specula produced by both these gentlemen with that machine, why trouble the Association with an imitation of that invention? This question is solved by the weighty argument of the three letters £ s. d. The polishing machine of Mr. Lassell is constructed entirely of metal, is quite out of the power of any amateur to construct, requires to be bolted to wall, can scarcely be turned by hand power, weighs at least three or four hundredweight, and from the great care and accuracy required in its construction, costs, I think, £70, while a light portable machine on the principle of this model can, without any difficulty, be made by any handy amateur with a common foot lathe for less than 70s., and need not weigh 90 pounds. The only machine I ever made on this principle is amply powerful to polish specula of 12 or 14 inches aperture ; its fly-wheel is only 2 feet diameter, weighing about 45 lbs., and such a fly-wheel can always be found at the old iron stands for six or eight shillings: all the spindles are common bar iron TRANSACTIONS OF THE SECTIONS. 95 with the journeys turned on them, and all the bearings are of box-wood, which is far better than bell-metal, as neither heating, wearing, or scarcely ever requiring oil. In that beautiful machine of Mr. Lassell, the axis of the table which carries the speculum is in the same line with the axis of the slow crank, which by two systems of gearing rotating round a fixed toothed wheel, the pin of the quick crank carries the centre of the polisher with an epicycloidal motion over the surface of the specu- lum. This machine effects the same object simply by a crank rotating in a circle, but the centre of the table which carries the speculum, can be moved at pleasure more or less distant from the centre of that circle. This simple sliding of the axis of the table out of the line of the axis of the crank, causes the centre of the polisher to describe over the face of the speculum the exact figure the more complex machine produces. When first I contemplated the construction of a polishing machine on this very simple principle, I never intended to do anything more than to imitate exactly the motions which produced such happy results in the hands of its talented inventor. In carrying out my design, it became obvious, that, by adding three or four more pulleys, at a cost of less than half so many shillings, the machine (in addition to the proved movements of Mr. Lassell’s machine) was invested with a power enabling an experimenter in that most interesting branch of practical science, to try the effect of a vast variety of motions for figuring, which the more complex machine is not capable of producing. A few of these motions have been transferred to paper, by substituting for the iron sliding box (which by its pin moves the polisher) a wooden sliding box carrying a pencil, and in place of the speculum these pieces of paper were laid on the table and held there with weights on their corners. The figures are extremely regular and of every conceivable variety of curve. Several specula of 43, 7, and 81 inches have been repeatedly polished and repo- lished with this machine, and in no instance has a really bad figure been the result. Of course some were better than others ; but I believe it will be admitted by all who have trodden this very difficult but interesting path of practical science, that a very fine figure is as much entitled to be enrolled in the chapter of accidents, as a really fine chronometer, which no care in its construction can possibly ensure. Ifthe cause of the imperfection of a speculum be ascertained, and it is found to be decidedly sphe- rical or hyperbolical, the former can with certainty be removed by increasing the excentricity of the table, and the latter by diminishing it. Very frequently, however, it happens that the different zones of a speculum, as tested by diaphragms, have their foci coincident, yet the speculum does not perform well, from a want of uniformity in the curvature. In these cases I have derived great advantage from placing the centre of the speculum a little excentric as regards the centre of the table, so that in working the excentricity (which is the slow crank in Lassell’s) is continually vary- ing from the sum of the two excentricities, to their difference, the mean excentricity remaining uuchanged. Latterly, indeed, I have always employed the double excen- tricity. A few remarks upon the formation of the polisher will bring this descrip- tion to a close. Mr. Lassell recommends making the polisher of two pieces of light wood glued together, with their grain at right angles; in his hands it has certainly performed wonders, but as it is liable to warp with hygrometric changes in the atmosphere, it is as well totally to prevent such warping by employing three, instead of two pieces of board, making the two outside pieces at right angles to the’ centre piece as regards their grain. To make the furrows in the pitch so that they shall not fill up in polishing, is extremely difficult by the ordinary process of pressing the pitch while in a soft state with the edge of a ruler, as the pitch forced out of the furrows is heaped up on the edges of the squares, leaving a hollow in the centre of each square; in working it is forced back again, and it is absolutely necessary that the furrows should remain open during the entire process of polishing. I prefer covering the surface of the polisher with squares of wood about 3 inch in thickness and 2 an inch apart, stuck on with hot pitch or glue, and a nail in the centre. The polisher being held with the face down, the squares are covered over with a brush dipped in the pitch (not very hot), and repeating the operation until a proper thick- ness be obtained; when made in this way the furrows will never fill up except the pitch be much too soft. 26 REPORT—1856. On the Physical Structure of the Earth. By Professor Hennessy. After some preliminary observations as to the impossibility of accounting for the earth’s figure, without supposing it to have been once a fused mass, the exterior of which has cooled into a solid crust, the process of solidification of the fluid was described. The influence of the convection and circulation of the particles in a heterogeneous fluid was shown to be different from what would take place in a homogeneous fluid such as usually comes under our notice. As the primitive fluid mass of the earth would consist of strata increasing in density from the surface towards the centre, its refrigeration would be that of a heterogeneous fluid, and the process of circulation would be less energetic in going from its surface towards its centre. Thus the earth would ultimately consist of a fluid nucleus enclosed in a spheroidal shell. The increase in thickness of this shell would take place by the solidification of each of the surface strata of the nucleus in succession. Ifthe matter composing the interior of the earth is subjected to the same physical laws as the material of the solid crust coming under our notice, the change of state in the fluid must be accompanied by a diminution of its volume. The contrary hypothesis had been hitherto always assumed in mathematical investigations relative to the form and structure of the earth. The erroneous supposition that the particles of the primitive fluid retained the same positions after the mass had advanced in the pro- cess of solidification as they had before the process commenced, had been tacitly or openly assumed in all such inquiries until it was formally rejected by the author*, who proposed to assume for the fluid similar properties to those exhibited by the fusion and solidification of such portions of the solidified crust as are accessible to observation. The results to which the improved hypothesis has led, show that it fundamentally affects the whole question, not only of the shape and internal struc- ture of the earth, but also of the various actions and reactions taking place between the fluid nucleus and the solid shell. If the process of solidification took place without change of yolume in the congelation of the fluid, the strata of the shell would possess the same forms as those of the primitive fluid, and their oblateness would diminish in going from the outer to the inner surface. If the fluid contracts in volume on passing to the solid state, the remaining fluid will tend to assume a more and more oblate figure after the formation of each stratum of the shell. The law of density of the nucleus will not be the same as that of the primitive fluid, but will vary more slowly, and the mass will thus tend towards a state of homogeneity as the radius of the nucleus diminishes by the gradual thickening of the shell. The surface of the nucleus, and consequently the inner surface of the shell, will thus tend to become more oblate after each successive stratum added to the shell by con- gelation from the nucleus. This result, combined with another obtained by Mr. Hopkins, proves that so great pressure and friction exist at the surface of contact of the shell and nucleus as to cause both to rotate together nearly as one solid mass. Other grounds for believing in the existence of the great pressure exercised by the nucleus at the surface of the shell were adduced. If the density of the fluid strata were due to the pressures they support, and if the earth solidified without any change of state in the solidifying fluid, the pressure against the inner surface of the shell would be that due to the density of the surface stratum of the nucleus, and would therefore rapidly increase with the thickness of the shell. Contraction in volume of the fluid on entering the solid state would diminish this pressure, but yet it may continue to be very considerable, as the coefficient of contraction would always approach towards unity. The phenomena of the solidification of lava and of volcanic bombs were referred to in illustration of these views, and their application was then shown to some of the greatest questions of geology. The relations of symmetry which the researches of M. Elie de Beaumont seem to establish between the great lines of elevation which traverse the surface of the earth, appear to Prof. Hennessy far more simply and satisfactorily explained by the expansive tendency of the nucleus which produces the great pressure against the shell than by the collapse and subsi- dences of the latter. The direction of the forces which would tend to produce a rupture from the purely elevatory action of the pressure referred to would be far more favourable to symmetry than if the shell were undergoing a distortion of shape * Philosophical Transactions, 1851, part 2. TRANSACTIONS OF THE SECTIONS. yy a from collapsing inwards. The nearly spherical shape of the shell would also greatly increase its resistance to forces acting perpendicularly to its surface, so as to cause parts to subside, while the action of elevatory forces would not be resisted in the same manner. On the Eclipse of the Sun mentioned in the First Book of Herodotus, By the Rev. Dr, Eowarp Hinckxs. The author maintained that the eclipse of the 18th of May, 603 3.c., was that. which terminated the Lydian war, and that from this celebrated eclipse and hiS knowledge of the period of 223 lunations, Thales had predicted the eclipse of the 28th of May, 585 s.c. Herodotus, he thought, had confounded the two eclipses with which the name of Thales was connected. Previously to the publication of Mr, Baily’s paper in 1811, it was generally belieyed by astronomers that the eclipse of 603 B.c. satisfied the conditions of that which terminated the war, the field of battle being supposed to be in the neighbourhood of Kars. Now that Mr, Baily’s arguments against this eclipse have been shown to be _ erroneous, the author regretted that recent writers had neglected it; the elements of it having never been calculated: with the improved lunar tables now in use, On an Instrument to illustrate Poinsét’s Theory of Rotation, By J, C. Maxwett. In studying the rotation of a solid body according to Poinsét’s method, we have to consider the successive positions of the instantaneous axis of rotation with refer- ence both to directions fixed in space and axes assumed in the moving body. The paths traced out by the pole of this axis on the imvariable plane and on the central ellipsoid form interesting subjects of mathematical investigation. But when we attempt to follow with our eye the motion of a rotating body, we find it difficult to determine through what point of the body the instantaneous axis passes at any time,—and to determine its path must be still more difficult, I have endeavoured to render visible the path of the instantaneous axis, and to vary the circumstances of motion, by means of a top of the same kind as that used by Mr. Elliot, to illustrate precession*. The body ofthe instrument is a hollow cone of wood, rising from a ring, 7 inches in diameter and 1 inch thick. An iron axis, 8 inches long, screws into the vertex of the cone. The lower extremity has a point of hard steel, which rests in an agate cup, and forms the support of the instrument. An iron nut, three ounces in weight, is made to screw on the axis, and to be fixed at any point; and in the wooden ring are screwed four bolts, of three ounces, working horizontally, and four bolts, of one ounce, working vertically. On the upper part of the axis is placed a disc of card, on which are drawn four concentric rings. Each ring is divided into four quadrants, which are coloured red, yellow, green, and blue. The spaces between the rings are white. When the top is in motion, it is easy to see in which quadrant the instantaneous axis is at any moment and the distance between it and the axis of the‘instrument; and we observe,—Ist. That the instantaneous _ axis travels in a closed curve, and returns to its original position in the body. | 2ndly. That by working the vertical bolts, we can make the axis of the instrument the centre of this elosed curve. It wil] then be one of the principal axes of inertia. 3rdly. That, by working the nut on the axis, we ean make the order of colours either red, yellow, green, blue, or the reverse, When the order of colours is in the same direction as the rotation, it indicates that the axis of the instrument is that of great- est moment of inertia, 4thly. That if we screw the two pairs of opposite horizontal bolts to different distances from the axis, the path of the instantaneous pole will no a longer be equidistant from the axis, but will describe an ellipse, whose longer axis is in the direction of the mean avis of the instrument. 5thly. That if we now make one of the two horizontal axes less and the other greater than the vertical axis, the instan- * Transsactions of the Royal Scottish Society of Arts, 1855. 98 REPORT—1856. taneous pole will separate from the axis of the instrument, and the axis will incline more and more till the spinning can no longer go on, on account of the obliquity. It is easy to see that, by attending to the laws of motion, we may produce any of the above effects at pleasure, and illustrate many different propositions by means of the same instrument. On the Constancy of Solar Radiation. By Professor Prazzi Suyrtu, F.R.S.E. Having lately recomputed all our earth-thermometric observations from the year 1838 to 1854 inclusive, I am able to offer to the Association a few particulars respecting acosmical question, on which many speculations have been ventured, but no exact numerical particulars ascertained,—I mean the constancy in amount of heat radiated from the sun. These earth-thermometers have been observed once a week during the whole period alluded to, and are admirably adapted to equalize temporary meteorological variations, and to give good mean results. Their bulbs (filled with alcohol) are buried in the porphyry rock of the hill at the several depths of 3, 6, 12, 24 French feet, and their tubes are long enough to rise to the surface of the ground where the scales are placed, and may be read off to *01 of a degree Fahrenheit. This set of thermometers was one of those which were esta- blished in and about Edinburgh in 1837 for the British Association, under the care of Prof. J. D. Forbes, and it is the only one of them which has survived more than half the period which has elapsed. The excellence and completeness of the burial of the bulb of every thermometer is vouched for by the length of time which the wave of summer heat is found to occupy in reaching each bulb in succession accord- ing to its depth. Thus the 3-feet thermometer has its maximum in August; the 6-feet ditto in September; the 12-feet ditto in October; and the 24- feet ditto in Decem- ber or January. Again, from the annual range decreasing with the depth, as the 3-feet thermometer, annual range = 15°; the 6-feet ditto, annual range = 9°°8; the 12-feet ditto, annual range = 4°°6; and the 24-feet ditto, annual range = 1°2, And when it is added that each weekly observation is carefully corrected for the effect caused by the difference between the temperature of the bulb, and of the several parts of the stem and scale, it will be seen, I trust, that the annual means of such observations must be worth some attention. They are as follow :— Annual! means of Thermometers. / On. these thermometers two heating forces are evidently acting, one from without and residing in the sun, the other from within from the supposed molten centre of the earth. Let us dispose of this one first. From the immense comparative thick- TRANSACTIONS OF THE SECTIONS. 29. ness of the bad conducting rock between the lowest of our thermometers and any part of the earth where its substance can be fluid with heat, and be capable of assuming more sudden changes of position or temperature than a solid can, we may safely in a first examination consider the internal or terrestrial effect as constant at each depth for the whole period from 1838 to 1854. The effect is smail, but very sensible, as thus :— Mean of each Thermometer for the whole period, from 1838 to 1854. t, 3-feet thermometer 46°27 ts 6 os 46°55 te 12 $y 46°94 t, 24 Z 47°24 where we find each thermometer to tell the same story of, and to point to, a heated terrestrial centre, even by approaching so small a space as 3 feet ; and on the whole they show an increase of 1° Fahr., with 21 feet of difference of depth for the in- ternal influence, or the terrestrial source of surface temperature. Subtracting the differences between ¢, and the other thermometers from each in turn, we obtain the following Table, wherein the terrestrial effect being eliminated, the variations from cosmical influences become more apparent :— | —— | | | If these numbers be projected with the times, the curves they form are most in- teresting, for they contain appearances of periodical waves distributed over a secular swell, with so long a period, that only a small portion of it appears in the seventeen _ years. _ If then we can depend on our observations being strictly cleared of every instru- mental and terrestrial cause of disturbance which can logically affect their accuracy, we have at once an indication of our sun being amongst the number of variable stars. Can we then depend on them to this extent? The only possible room that Ican see for doubt, is the question of the constancy of the zero-points of the thermo- ‘Meters ; and having no means of inquiring into this practically, I can only combine with the general experience of the unalterability of spirit-thermometers, with the very thick glass bulbs and tubes here employed, after a certain period, the particular observations by Professor J. D. Forbes on a thermometer made at the same time as our set, and in the same manner, and filled with the same spirit. The result of examination was, that after nine years no appreciable change (certainly not 2;th of a degree) was found. _ This is very satisfactory ; and if further evidence be required that there is some tural and cosmical cause acting on our thermometers, tending to produce an effect, 30 REPORT—1856. certainly very similar to what an alteration in the zero-points might do, we have- such evidence in special features of difference between the curves of the several thermometers. Thus while ¢, and ¢,, by the rapid and uniform rise of their curves at the beginning of the period, lead one to suspect the possibility of something in- strumental affecting them, yet it may be that the observations were commenced at the bottom of one of the temperature waves, of which there are evidently three, with a nearly sexennial period between 1838 and 1854. If this latter be the true expla- nation, then inasmuch as ¢, is retarded in its indications on ¢, and ¢; by two or three months, it ought to show in 1838 by so much the temperature of the opposite slope of the wave, and its curve should not reach its maximum depression so pointedly in 1838 as those of ¢, and ¢;. On looking at it, we find ¢, fulfilling these expectations perfectly, for its curve, instead of rising up steeply from 1838 to 1839, is nearly level. But there is still another proof: ¢, ought to exhibit the retarded effects of ¢, in a still greater degree, if the continued rise of ¢, and ¢; in 1838-39 and 1840 be due toa cosmical cause, and not to an instrumental defect that would act on all the thermo- meters alike. Now ¢, does precisely what it should do on such a hypothesis ; for instead of being only level like ¢, for 1838-39, it is even depressed, having its minimum in the latter year. : Similarly, it will be found through the whole of the period of our observations, that by their regulated differences from each other depending on the effect of the several depths of non-conducting matter covering each of them, the several thermo- meters serve to confirm each other, as really indicating changes in the mean tempe- rature of the surface of the earth, such as can hardly be attributed to any cause but the variations in the development of solar light and heat. In this case the ascertainment of the period of the secular wave must be of the utmost importance; for its summit may bring us years warmer than any that have been felt in our own day, and the bottom of it seasons with cold in corresponding severity. On a Collimator for completing the Adjustments of Reflecting Telescopes. By Professor G. Jounstone Stoney, M.A. This paper described an accessory to large reflecting telescopes, designed to assist in adjusting their mirrors at night with more ease and accuracy than hitherto. In general construction the new collimator resembles the telescopes made use of by engineers ; it differs only so far that provision must be made for sufficiently illu- minating the wires or an artificial star, and that its large lens should have a focal length f, determined by the equation h adie’ f aF where F is the focal length of the telescope to be adjusted, and d is the distance from the centre of the large lens of the collimator to the cross wires. If this instrument be placed in the usual position of the eye-pieces, the illuminated cross wires, and the image of them which will be formed, may be viewed in it, and if these be now brought into coincidence by the adjustment of the mirrors, the line from the inter- section of the cross wires to the centre of the large lens of the collimator will be the optic axis of the telescope ; 7. e, this ray, after reflexion from the small mirror will, if produced backward, pass through the centre of curvature of the large mirror. A slight addition to the arrangement would ensure that this axis should also pass approximately through the vertex of the large mirror; but it was supposed that, so far as the optical performance of the telescope is concerned, this would be found a needless refinement if the collimator be employed only to complete adjustments already approximately made by the usual methods, and if the small mirror be properly supported. - The experiments which had been made showed that this latter condition was one of much importance and required that the support of the small mirror should be very stiff, and that the small mirror should be counterpoised at the end of it, The small mirror is usually supported by a single arm placed edgewise, in order to intercept but little light; a second bar, also placed edgewise, and forming a small angle TRANSACTIONS OF THE SECTIONS. , 31 with the first, had been found sufficient to make the arrangement capable of re+ sisting flexure and vibration in a surprising degree, and, as the angle may be reduced so far that both bars can be attached to a slide carrying the eye-pieces, it is also more convenient than the steadying wire which has been sometimes employed. The facility and accuracy offered by the use of the new collimator are such, that it Was suggested that in some instances it might be desirable to make arrangements for adjusting the telescope after every considerable change of altitude. If the collimator were to be thus frequently employed, a beautiful contrivance made use of by Lord Rosse might with much advantage be adapted to it, by mounting it and one or two of the eye-pieces in a slide so that any one of them could in a moment be brought opposite to the coneof rays. A slide moving on a centre was recommended. Since the tilt of the large mirror will thus become of less importance, we may henceforth admit for its support arrangements which introduce more tilt than those at present in use, and thus the solution of what now remains the most difficult problem of large reflecting telescopes may possibly be facilitated. On Phenomena recently discovered in the Moon. By J. Symons, M.A. On the reasons for describing the Moon’s Motion as a Motion about her azis. By the Rev. W. Wuewe tt, M.4A., D.D., F.R.S. Merrorotoey. On the Causes of Great Inundations. By Tuomas Dozson, B.A., of St. John’s College, Cambridge. The principal special causes which tend to produce great inundations in a country are, the inclination and the lithological character of the surface of the basins drained by the rivers of the country. Where the subsoil of a river-basin is composed chiefly of porous and therefore permeable materials, as oolite, loose gravel, &c., the rain will be absorbed almost as fast as it falls, and will reach the river gradually, after returning to the surface through springs. But where the subsoil is generally compact and impermeable, as clay, granite, &c., the rain will flow over the surface with more or less velocity, according to the greater or less inclination of the surface to the horizon. So far, therefore, as the geological character of a river-basin is concerned, the tendency to inundation due to that basin will be measured by the difference between the areas of the permeable and of the impermeable superficial strata, and by the inclination of the sides of the basin to the horizon. The general cause of great inundations in the countries forming the western sea- board of Europe, is the easterly progressive motion of the cyclones, or revolving storms, of the North Atlantic Ocean. Starting from the Caribbean Sea and the Gulf of Mexico, and sweeping during a considerable portion of their early course along the warm surface of the Gulf-stream, they collect the vapours so copiously generated in southern latitudes and finally pre- cipitate them on the high lands and mountain chains of Europe. In general, several cyclones follow each other in rapid succession, so that the continued rains at length saturate the earth, and floods and inundations ensue. I shall illustrate these remarks on the general cause of European inundations by a brief meteorological history of the great inundations in France in October 1844, October 1846, and in May and June of the present year. 1844,—The tracks of the cyclones of October 1844 have been determined by Mr. Redfield. The first passed over the West Indian Islands on the Ist and 2nd of 82 REPORT—1856. October. The second was the “ great Cuba hurricane,” which destroyed more than a hundred ships at Havannah, Jamaica, &c.. The loss at Havannah alone was estimated at £1,000,000. Its diameter already exceeded 1000 miles. Passing over Cuba on the 3rd and 4th of October, it skirted the coasts of the United States, and struck off eastward into the North Atlantic Ocean at Newfoundland on the 8th of October. Smaller cyclones, waterspouts, &c., as usual, followed in its rear. The barometer in Britain, as shown by the annexed curve, distinctly recognizes the arrival of each member of this chain of aérial eddies. Tempests, rains, unusually heavy floods, and destructive inundations marked their progress over France, Ger- many; Italy, &c. 1846.—On the 10th of September, 1846 (Col. Reid, ‘ Development of the Law of Storms,’ p. 371), a great cyclone formed between the islands of Trinidad, Marguerita, Grenada, and Tobago. ‘‘ Asit advanced, its force increased, until it became a tempest of a furious kind. Passing to the westward of Bermuda, it blew there a hard gale on the 17th and 18th, with the centre a little to the eastward of Newfoundland, where it did great damage to the town of St. John’s, and was felt as far as 19° W., 50° N, on the eastern side of the Atlantic.”” We have here evidence that this cyclone came from the West India Islands to the mouth of the English Channel. The barometric readings given by Col. Reid show that the south-eastern margin passed over Bermuda between the 13th and 20th of September. The accompanying baro- metric curves for Rouen and the Orkneys during September and October 1846, prove that the front of this cyclone first affected the barometer at Rouen on the 17th of September. This was followed by a series of cyclonic paroxysms, of which the most violent has been examined in detail by Mr. Redfield. It began in the Caribbean Sea on the 6th of October, and passed over Havannah on the 11th, wrecking more than 100 ships, and sending the mercurial column down to 27°70 inches. On the 12th nearly the whole town of Rey West, in Mexico, was destroyed, and twenty ships driven ashore. On the 13th it swept over Washington and New York, and started across the Atlantic from Newfoundland on the 14th of October. . 1846, Bermuda 13145 16 F 38 1920 TRANSACTIONS OF THE SECTIONS. 33 These dates indicate approximately the position of the central area, which may have a diameter of 100 miles, while the whole cyclone probably extends more than 2000 miles, for the barometer shows that the front often strikes the British Islands about the same time as the rear is leaving Newfoundland. Here then was an uninterrupted series of cyclones, which, beginning among the tropical heats of the West Indies, crossed the Atlantic in succession and maintained a continuous discharge of storms and unprecedently heavy rains in Britain, France, Germany, and Italy, from the 17th of September to the end of October. On the 30th of September a destructive tempest passed over Sicily and Italy. Seven villages near Messina were destroyed by storms and inundations. At Portici many houses fell and fifteen persons perished. The village of St. Firmin was engulphed and many lives lost. From the 15th to the 18th of October a tempest raged over the whole Continent. During that period there fell ‘153 m. (6 inches) of rain at Mont- brison, in France. On the 16th, the village of Schledorf, three leagues from Munich, was utterly destroyed by a storm of wind, rain, and lightning. On the 18th the great rivers of France overflowed ; the Loire rose 6°94 métres (73 yards) above its mean height, and a general inundation ensued, the most destructive since that of the 13th of November, 1790. In the Tyrol, it rained incessantly from the 28th to the 31st of October, and the River Elsch inundated the country. On the western coasts of Britain and Ireland, the rear of the last cyclone pro- duced a hurricane from N.W., which occasioned great loss of life and property on the 22nd and 23rd of October. 1850.— Before considering the inundations of 1856, it will be useful to show that the elevated temperature which invariably accompanies the southern half of a cyclone, January 1850. 232495 26 may sometimes exert a powerful influence in promoting an inundation by suddenly melting the snows accumulated on the mountains during the winter. On the 26th of January, 1850, a warm rain began to fall at Paris, and melted the snows at the _ sources of the Seine and its affluents so rapidly as to produce an extraordinary flood. The annexed barometrical curves for the Orkneys, Versailles, and Bordeaux, show the presence at that time of a cyclone of moderate dimensions, the central track ; _ passing between the Orkneys and Versailles. The outer southern margin passes ; 3 ‘1856. - t : 34 REPORT—1856. over Bordeaux, where the wind is light. At Versailles the thermometric curves show * that the warm S.W. wind raised the temperature 12° C., and the cold N.W. wind afterwards produced a corresponding depression. These curves are good types of the general actions of the barometer and thermometer during the transit of a cyclone. hi Mey hoe a hy Ati t anh Ly : Elgin. i ie SS ES Wakefield. —— E Teignmouth. 1856.—In order to determine as accurately as possible the various phases of the _ weather in Great Britain during the months of April and May, 1856, I have con- : structed the curve of barometric pressure, and the curves of maximum and minimum temperature (the latter on the scale of 20° F. to an inch) from the observations during these months, at eight stations of the British Meteorological Society ; viz. Elgin, Anstruther, and Makerstoun, in Scotland ; Stonyhurst, Wakefield, Canter- bury, and Teignmouth, in England; and Lampeter, in Wales. From these I have selected to accompany this paper the curves for Wakefield, where observations are made night and day at equal intervals of six hours, and those for Elgin and Teign- mouth, the extreme stations to the North and South respectively. These curves indicate, as in the case of the inundations of 1846, a succession of : cyclones, of storms of wind and rain, producing floods of increasing height and — violence, until the culminating disastrous inundations at the end of May and in the i beginning of June. + Two cyclones, either of enormous extent or of slow progressive motion, occupy the whole month of April. The first ended about the 15th, and caused great floods in the Garonne, and other large rivers of France. The second cyclone had passed over by the 2nd of May. An abrupt depression of the mercury, accompanied by heavy easterly gales, shows the passage, of a cyclone between the 3rd and 8th of May ; the central track lying to the south of, Britain. From the 8th to the 20th of May, a deep cyclonic depression occurs. Physical phenomena happen during this period, which frequently characterize the passage of cyclones in tropical countries. On the 10th of May there was a heavy earthquake at Saint Rabier, in the canton of Terras- f i LS TRANSACTIONS OF THE SECTIONS. 35 son, by which a mountain was precipitated into a ravine. On the same day great storms devastated Rhenish Bavaria; a destructive waterspout fell in the commune of Dembach, and the Garonne and other rivers of France again overflowed. On the 12th of May a waterspout fell at Givry, St. Denis; and another at Beaume on the 15th. In Britain the temperature rose 20° F. on the 9th, with the S.W. wind, and con- tinued high until the end of the month. Several accounts from the south and west of France mention the powerful influence of the south and south-west winds at this time in melting the snows on the mountains. The barometric curve shows that the centre of the cyclone passed on the 18th, a day signalized by great storms at London, Rouen, and in the South of France. At Nantes on that day, the wind blew violently from the S.W. and then shifted sud- denly to the northward, a well-known indication of the passage of the centre of a cyclone. From the 20th to the 30th of May, the faithful barometer registers the passage over Britain of the northern margins of two closely-allied cyclones, whose centres lay far to the southward. In each case the wind veers from S.E. through E. to N.E., and the depressions increase in depth towards the south. A very heavy thunder-storm passed over England on the 22nd of May; at Brad- ford Moor a man was killed by lightning; the Midland Railway was flooded and several villages inundated. At Leeds the river Aire overflowed, and two lives were lost. On the 25th of May two men were killed by lightning during a thunder-storm, at Strabane, in Scotland. On the 29th of May, Brighton, Hastings, Portsmouth, and all the South Coast of England, were visited by a violent storm of thunder, lightning, rain, and hail. Such were the effects in Britain, which was merely grazed by the northern margins of the two associated cyclones. The effects were much more disastrous in countries farther south, which lay nearer to the centres of the cyclones. Violent storms of wind, hail, and rain traversed France, Austria, Italy, and Spain. The enormous falls of rain deluged the countries already saturated by the previous inundations of the middle of May. At Lyons it rained continuously for forty-six hours, from 7 p.m. of the 29th to 5 p.m. of the 31st of May. At Ainay, the rain measured in this interval was ‘30 m. (112 inches), and at Aux Brotteaux it was ‘22 m. (83 inches). These rains were general over the western countries of Europe. An indication of the east- erly progress of these cyclones is given by an account of a great storm which broke over Ratisbon on the afternoon of the 3lst of May, accompanied by a waterspout. Great damage ensued at Ratisbon. Scarcely one house in Lichtenfels was uninjured, whole roofs were carried away, and the strongest trees uprooted. The numerous cyclone-tracks determined by Redfield and Reid all tend to pass to the northward of Great Britain, and this agrees with the well-known preduminance of south-westerly and westerly gales here. But the barometric curves, and the winds, prove that the centres of the twin-cyclones of May 260 to 30 lay far to the south of England. Now, as cyclones invariably move, more or less, from the equator towards the pole, their track must have been through latitudes unusually low, at a season of the year when the sun has a high northern declina- May 1856, Bordeaux. tion. This passage through an atmosphere of an elevated temperature, and therefore abounding in vapour, will account for the altogether abnormal quantities of rain which they precipitated on southern Europe. M. Abria, Dean of the Faculty of Sciences of Bor- deaux, having most obligingly forwarded to me a copy of his Meteorological Observations, taken four times daily, from May 20th to June 6th, I am enabled to determine approximately, as in the annexed sketch, the positions of the centres of the twin-cyclones of the end of May. : The first cyclone declared its approach at Bordeaux on the 21st by “‘a very strong” §.E. gale, with thunder and lightning. The centre, therefore, lay to the south of Bordeaux. Where the two cyclones impinge upon and interfere with each other, 3% 36 REPORT—1856. the S.W. wind of the second neutralizes the N.E. wind of the first; the wind is feeble and the mercury rises. Nevertheless, the S.W. prevails on the 25th; this changes to W., and finally to N.W. on the 28th and 29th with almost continual rain. These winds show that the centre of the second cyclone passed to the north of Bordeaux, and therefore between Bordeaux and Teignmouth. In neither of these cyclones is the central barometric depression so extreme as is usual in the great winter storms. This may probably arise from the confusion or juxtaposition of the central spaces. DP (ly J 1? een a. On the Balaklava Tempest, and the Mode of Interpreting Barometrical Fluc- tuations. By T. Doxson, B.A. of St. John’s College, Cambridge. In the month of November, 1854, the passage of a storm over the British islands caused a considerable depression of the barometric column, beginning on the 11th of November and ending on the 19th, as shown by the barometric curves which accompany this paper. During four consecutive days of this period of diminished atmospheric pressure, there occurred in the coal mines of Britain six fatal explo- sions, at the following places :—on Nov. 13, at Old Park Colliery, Dudley, Worces- tershire; Nov. 14, Cramlington Colliery, Northumberland; Nov. 15, Bennett’s Colliery, Bolton, Lancashire; Birchey Coppice Colliery, Dudley; and Coalbrook Vale Colliery, Monmouthshire; Noy. 16, Rosehall Colliery, Coatbridge, N.B. These facts alone render this storm worthy of especial attention, independently of the notoriety which it has acquired from its disastrous effects on the allied fleets and armies in the Crimea. The meteorological circumstances which characterized the Balaklava tempest have been determined with unusual care and skill, from avery great number of observations at stations spread over the whole surface of Europe, by M. Liais, of the Imperial Observatory at Paris. In all probability, many years will elapse before a great storm on land is subjected to an examination so rigorous and complete as that undertaken by M. Liais, in the present instance. This storm may therefore be adopted as the most satisfactory test that we are likely to have for some time to come of the correctness of the principles of interpretation which I have already applied to barometric fluctuations in my report on the relation be- tween explosions in coal mines and revolving storms,—principles which flow directly from the nature of cyclones. A TRANSACTIONS OF THE SECTIONS. 37 For the observations with which I have constructed the barometrical curves for November, 1854, at Teignmouth in Devonshire, Stonyhurst in Lancashire, Wakefield in Yorkshire, and Dunino in Scotland, I am indebted to Mr. Glaisher, the able bead rn_ f\ f\ /\ sussis Orkneys ....... N fi \© Dunino ....... Wakefield Stonyhurst ... Teignmouth ...jA November 1854. Secretary of the British Meteorological Society. The curve for the Orkney Islands is from observations published in the ‘Philosophical Magazine.’ At Wakefield and Stonyhurst observations are made four times a day, at the other stations twice a day. The cyclonic interpretation in this case would be—First, that the curves indicate the passage of a cyclone, of which the central track lay to the southward of England. This is inferred from the gradual increase of the barometric depression from the Orkneys in the north to Teignmouth in the south, and depends on the fact that the height of the mercurial column decreases continuously from the circumference to the centre of a cyclone. This inference is confirmed by the observation that the wind blew from the eastward at all the above-mentioned stations. Secondly, that the cyclone Was progressing to the eastward. This is derived from observing that at each station the wind began at S.E. while the mercury was falling, veered to E. when the mercury was lowest, and then to N.E. as the mercury rose. If the wind had - =~ veered from S.W. through W. to N.W.., as it does most frequently in British storms, and the barometric depressions had increased from Teignmouth towards the Orkneys, the interpretations would have been, that the depression was caused by a cyclone travelling eastward, of which the central track lay to the north of Scotland. In the first case (A), the explanation would be that the chord (S.E., E., N.E.) passed over the British islands, and the chord (S.W., W., N.W.) in the second case (B). Such deductions are both obvious and satisfactory to persons whose knowledge of nautical technicalities has enabled them to appreciate the demonstrations of the rotatory 38 REPORT—1856. and progressive motions of Atlantic cyclones, given by Redfield, Reid, &c. M. Liais having favoured me with an opportunity of studying his unpublished charts of the Balaklava tempest, I have found therein a distinct and impressive confirmation of the correctness of the method of interpreting barometric fluctuations according to the laws of cyclonology. These charts fully establish the truth of the inferences derived above from the contemporaneous barometric curvesin Britian. They prove that the Balaklava tempest was a cyclone, moving to the eastward, along a central track which lay to the southward of Britain. It is known that during their transit from the Gulf of Mexico to the western coasts of Europe, across the comparatively uniform surface of the ocean, cyclones preserve an approximately circular form. The excellent charts of M. Liais, at the same time that they exhibit the progress of the storm day by day, from the shores of Britain across the continent of Europe, to the Caucasian mountains and the borders of the Caspian Sea, show also the remarkable modifica- tions produced in the normal condition of the cyclone by mountains and other irregularities of the surface of the land. Thus, for example, a portion of the cyclone is delayed nearly twenty-four hours in passing the Alps. The consequence of this and similar obstructions is, that what was nearly a circular atmospheric wave while crossing the ocean, takes the form of a much elongated and somewhat distorted ellipse on land, enveloping an elliptical central area of maximum barometric depres- sion, which extends, on one chart, from Dantzic in the Baltic to Varna in the Black Sea. Around.this central space the wind still blows continuously in the direction peculiar to the cyclones of the northern hemisphere. In the case therefore of the Balaklava tempest, whose nature has been determined with much greater exactness than that of any other tempest on land, we have unequivocal testimony that the principles of cyclonology may be safely applied to interpret the fluctuations of the barometer in Great Britain. On a Model of a Self-Registering Anemometer. Designed and Constructed by R. Beckuey, of Kew Observatory. Described by Mr. Weusu. In this model Mr. Beckley has adopted Dr. Robinson’s method of measuring the velocity of the wind by the rotation of a system of hemispherical cups, the direc- tion being indicated by a double wheel-fan like the directing vane at the back of a windmill. A stout tubular support carries the whole of the external part of the instrument, including the measurer of velocity, the direetion vane, and a rain-gauge. This support is so made that it can be easily adapted to the roof of any building upon which it may be necessary to mount it. All the rotatory parts of the anemo- meter run upon friction balls. The shaft of the apparatus for measuring the move- ment of the wind, by means of a diminishing train of wheels, is made to turn a cylinder upon which is wrapped a sheet of paper of the kind used for “ metallic memorandum books,” this paper having the property of receiving a trace from a style of brass. The sheet of paper is divided into two sections, upon one of which is recorded the motion of the wind and upon the other the direction. As the cylinder is being turned by the action of the wind, a clock carries a pencil along the cylinder at a uniform rate of 12 inches in the twenty-four hours. To the lower end of the direction shaft is attached a spiral of such a figure that equal angles correspond to equal increments of radius; the edge of this spiral consists of a thin slip of brass, which touches the paper and records the direction of the wind on a rectiJinear scale. When the sheet of paper is unwrapped from the cylinder after twenty-four hours, the motion of the wind and the direction are both found projected in rectangular co-ordinates. With reference to anemometric observations at sea, Mr. Welsh read the following extract from a letter which he had addressed to the Chairman of the Kew Committee, describing a method of making allowance for the effect of the ship’s motion upon the observed velocity and direction of the wind :—‘*‘ By means of a portable Robinson’s anemometer, provided with a means of observing the total number of turns made by the rotating part in any given time, observe the apparent velocity of the wind and record it in knots per hour. By an anemoscope of any kind register the apparent direc- tion of the wind. From the log-book take the rate and direction of the ship’s motion. Ona slate or other similar surface scratch a permanent compass circle. Set off from the centre of the circle, on the radius of the direction of the ship’s head, by any Saxe TRANSACTIONS OF THE SECTIONS. 39 convenient scale, the number of knots per hour the ship is going; from this point draw a pencil line parallel to the direction of the wind as observed by the anemo- scope (i. e. the apparent direction to which the wind is going) ; set off on this line the number of knots per hour as shown by the anemometer ; draw a line from the centre of the circle to this last point. The length of this line by the scale adopted gives the ¢rue velocity of the wind, and its direction (carried backwards) shows the point from which the wind is coming. A parallel ruler divided on the edge is all that is required besides the slate. It would be easy enough to contrive some mechanism to save the trouble of drawing linés, but it would not, I believe, be any real simplification, and would increase the expense. The train of indicating wheels might be so arranged that they at once indicate knots per hour without reference to tables, and can be readily set to zero for a fresh observation.” On a remarkable Hail-Storm in North Staffordshire. With some Casts of the Hailstones. By R. Garner. This storm, which came from the N.W. in the afternoon of the 22nd of July last, between four and five o’clock, continued with great violence for about half an hour,— some of the masses of ice which fell being 13 inch in diameter, and of course doing corresponding injury, for instance, breaking more than twenty large squares of glass in the rather small house of his (the writers’s) next-door neighbour, and those of his own Wardian case. Most of the hailstones seemed to have nodulated nuclei, containing numerous particles of air, and externally to these were formed irregular conglomerations of ice, looking like a mass of imperfect but transparent crystals. The storm was attended with gusts of wind and thunder, and was of a very limited and defined extent; but to the south of the writer’s residence, about four miles away, near the Barlaston Station, a violent wind frém an opposite direction, S.W. or S8.S.W., occurred at the same hour, without rain or hail, the ravages of which could afterwards be traced for a length of two miles, with a breadth of only from 50 to 100 yards. Oaks were deprived by it of their largest limbs, poplars broken at the height of 8 or 12 feet from the ground, and an alder, 50 feet high, was uprooted and carried some distance. The clouds were extremely dark for a great extent of country. An artist took some casts of such hailstones as he picked up, by no means the largest. These the writer exhibited with a drawing. On Isothermal Lines.. By Professor Hennessy, M .RLA. After some preliminary remarks as to the general influence of the distribution of land and water on the forms of isothermal lines, the author proceeded to discuss the distribution of these lines in islands. By considering an island situated so as to have its shores bathed by a warm oceanic current, if the influence of direct solar radiation be obstructed, it appears that the isothermals would be closed curves surrounding the centre of the island and having some relation to its coastline. The influence of ranges of mountains, and in general of inequalities in the surface of the island, as well as the modifying action of general winds, and the resulting changes in the shapes of the isothermals, were explained. By the introduction of solar radiation, it now follows from the mathematical theory of heat that the entire quan- tity of heat received by a unit of surface of the island will depend on two principal terms: one, a function of the distance of the point from the coast, and capable of being expressed in some cases as a function of the difference of latitude of that point and the nearest point on the coast ; and, secondly, of a term depending on the latitude and on an elliptic function of the second order having for its modulus the sine of the inclination of the equator to the ecliptic. It hence follows that the effect of solar radiation will be to transport the centres of all the closed isothermals towards the pole of the hemisphere in which the island is situated. Some of the lines may thus ultimately terminate at the coast with their convex sides turned towards the equator, while others may still continue as closed curves in the in- terior. If the influence of difference of latitude and direct solar radiation were greatly predominant compared to other causes affecting the temperature of the island, the isothermals might all terminate on the coast. If the continents may be considered as immense islands so circumstanced, they become subjects for the 40 REPORT—1856. application of these views.—Prof. Hennessy then proceeded to show that the isothermals of Ireland strictly conformed to his theory. On discussing the obser- vations collected and arranged by Dr. Lloyd in his ‘Memoir on the Meteorology of Ireland,’ it appears some of its isothermals are actually closed curves, while others terminate at points on the coast, the shortest being closest to the equator. The physical structure of Ireland, and the difference of nearly 4° between the tempera- ture of the seas bathing its shores and the air above them, rendered it probable, @ priori, that Ireland should present a good example for the application of the theory. From the general nature of his views, Prof. Hennessy anticipated that the discussion of observations in other islands would lead to their further confirma- tion; and it would ultimately follow, that not only are isothermals sinuous in their shapes and not generally parallel to the equator, but that many would be found which do not at all circumscribe the axis which joins the opposite poles of the earth. On an Instrument for observing Vertical Currents in the Atmosphere. By Professor HEnNEssy. The author said he had been led to devise this instrument when offering an explanation, printed in the ‘ Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy,’ of certain abnormal phenomena sometimes observed on the surface of Lough Erne. The instrument is constructed like a common wind-vane, but instead of the fixed tail, a circular disc is placed vertically on an axis passing through the branches of a fork at the tail end. This disc is pierced about half-way between its centre and circum- ference so as to admit another axle, to the ends of which are firmly attached two light rectangular discs. ‘These discs are always in a horizontal position, whatever may be the position of the circular disc, for each of them has ap endulum attached to its centre by which the centre of gravity is kept considerab!y below the axle. These discs, therefore, cannot be acted on by a wind which blows horizontally. The position of the circular disc will thus very clearly show whether any given current has an upward or a downward tendency. The application of this instrument to the study of mountain winds was pointed out, as well as to assist in studying some of the undula- tory movements of the atmosphere. In the trials which have been already made with it, Prof. Hennessy stated that it gave satisfactory results. The instrument is of course not an anemometer, but simply a kind of universal anemoscope, for it shows both the horizontal and vertical directions of a current. On Negretti and Zambra’s Mercurial Minimum Thermometer. By Joun Lez, LL.D., F.R.S. Dr. Lee exhibited the thermometer to the Section, and pointed out the advantages of a thermometer of mercury in preference to alcohol, which is subject to unequal ex- pansion at different degrees of heat; it is a desideratum that ail thermometers in a meteorological observatory should be constructed with one fluid, and that mercury, the recognized standard measurer of heat. The thermometer has been tried at the Observatory of Greenwich; by Mr. Glaisher, the Secretary of the British Meteoro- logical Society ; Mr. E. J. Lowe of the Beeston Observatory, and several other emi- nent meteorologists ; some instances have occurred in which errors in the alcohol minimum thermometer have been corrected by the observations made by the mer- curial minimum thermometer. Dr. LEE made some remarks upon a pamphlet recently printed by Dr. Herbert Barker, of Bedford, on the relative value of the Ozonometers of Dr. Schénbein and Dr. Moffat, based upon daily observations made for eighteen months at Bedford, and he drew the attention of the audience to the following points :—1. Whether ozone observations have generally been conducted by them in their meteorological ob- servations? 2. Whether they use Schénbein’s or Moffat’s test papers, or both? 3. Whether they have noticed the difference between those which the Bedford observations those of Mr. Glaisher in various parts of London, and those at Hart- well House Observatory indicate? 4. Whether they will without delay add the Ozonometer to their instruments, as so much interest and importance belongs to the mysterious agent, Ozone, which is carrying on its, at present, incomprehensible effects on the atmosphere, in order that they may be recorded ? Oe ee ee TRANSACTIONS OF THE SECTIONS. 41 On a New Method of making Maximum Self-Registering Thermometers. By Joun Puiuirs, M.A., F.R.S., Reader in Geology in the University of Oxford. Thermometers constructed after this plan were first exhibited by Prof. Phillips, accompanied by a description, at the Oxford Meeting of the Association in 1832, In consequence of a careful examination by Mr. Welsh, of the principle on which they were arranged, attention was again called to the subject. The principle of the instrument is the employment of a certain portion of the column of mercury, detached as a marker. The length of this is capable of a great range of adaptation, to suit the objects of experiment ; when set to work, the instrument is independent of change, by time or chemical action, and as delicate in operation and as free from error as the best ordinary thermometer can be made. Mr. Phillips constructed many twenty-five years since, some of which remain in excellent state to this day. The length of the marker was varied at pleasure, by means of a second hollow ball blown at the extremity opposite the ball containing mercury. The longer this marker is left, the easier is its flow : at a certain small length, depending on the diameter of the tube, it will remain without turning in any position, and requires strong shaking to change its place. Mr. Welsh constructed some in a manner superior to that for- merly employed by Prof. Phillips, and reported in very favourable terms on the accuracy and permanency of the instrument. Thus encouraged, Mr. Casella had undertaken to adapt the thermometer to different purposes in meteorology and philo- sophical research, but without changing in any degree the essential character of the instrument. Among the examples on the table was one which was planned by Prof. Phillips for special researches on limited sources, or areas, of heat, with small bulb, fine bore, and short detached marking column. ‘Thus made, the thermometer may be used in any position, vertical, inclined, or horizontal, and the short detached marking column will retain its place with such firmness that instruments may be carried far, or even agitated much, without losing the registration. Observations with the Aneroid Meétallique and Thermometer, during a Tour through Palestine, and along the shores of the Dead Sea, October and November 1855. By Henry Poot. During a recent tour through Palestine, I carried an Aneroid Métallique,and though I would not presume to say that the results of observations made with it are quite correct, yet as the readings in many instances are close approximations to the cal- culations of Lynch and other travellers, I wish to draw attention to that instrument as affording an easy mode of obtaining approximate levellings of heights in unsur- veyed countries. It is light, and can be easily carried by a strap over the shoulder. From the rackwork being visible, a readjustment can easily be made when required upon ascending high mountains. A table of corrections is, however, required, and which I found must be additive with an increase of temperature (being the reverse of mercurial barometers and vacuum aneroids), as indicated by the variation in the readings at different tempera- tures at the same localities, as recorded in the accompanying Table. In Dent’s tables, 85 feet are calculated for the difference of each tenth of an inch of the barometer; this, multiplied by 39°37 inches, equal to a metre, gives 33°46 feet, or 333 feet in common practice, as the multiple of each division in the Aneroid Meétallique. In practice I found it very nearly correct; for instance, there are forty- seven steps with a 6-inch rise going down into the Tomb of the Virgin Mary in the Valley of Jehosophat equals 23°5 feet, and by aneroid I read a difference of 7 milli- metres X by 33°5=23°45 feet ; again, the minaret of the Church of Ascension on the top of the Mount of Olives measured 36°5 feet,—by aneroid the difference was 11 millims. X 33°5=36'85 feet. If the aneroid were mounted with a vernier scale, the observations could be more closely read off. I particularly mention these com- parisons of the aneroid with actual measurements, as they gave me confidence in it at the time, and also because I found on my return to London that I had arrived very nearly to the same results as Lieut. Lynch up to 2000 feet above the level of the Mediterranean Sea; and also in the depression of the Dead Sea, 1313°5 feet by aneroid, while Lynch made it 1316-7 feet by level, and Capt. Symonds calls it 1312 feet. There is also a variation in the line of the Dead Sea level at different seasons 42 REPORT—1856. of the year, for I found at Ras Em Barghek three distinct lines of drift-wood one above the other; opposite Usdum the line of salt incrustations was 40 yards, and the line of drift 70 yards distant from the edge of the sea; while along the west side of the peninsula ‘‘ E] Lisan,”’ a reef of rocks was exposed about a quarter of a mile distant from the shore, which does not appear to have been noticed by Lieut. Lynch’s party ; I therefore think I must have been there when the water was unusually low. I found the temperature of the Dead Sea at the north end 82° Fahr. at 5 a.m., and 83° Fahr. at the south end at 4 p.m. River Jordan, and brooks on the Lisan, and at the Ghor, 64° each. Brine spring 90°, where Lebia were caught near the sea-shore. Wady Em Barghek, temperature 76°. Spring at Engedi, 83°. At Ain Terabéh the sea was 80°; also a brine spring close to the shore, and the freshwater spring was 79°: in it were a number of Lebia swimming about, the largest appearing to be about 3 inches. A sulphurous smell was observed on passing the white hills south of Sebbeh near Wady El Mahras, at Birket el Khalil, but not at other places. It often blew hard during the day, but the waves never appeared to be more than two feet high, and the sea quickly went down after the wind ceased. Several nights were quite calm, but I never observed any phosphorescence on the water. The table of observations with the dry- and wet-bulb thermometer were made by the same instrument, as unfortunately I had broken two others, and there were not any to be bought in Jerusalem ; I therefore obtained the lower or wet-bulb tempera- tures by wetting the bulb, and waving the instrument about in the shade. The vapour arising from the Dead Sea, when looked at from the heights of Ain jidi and Ghomran, had the same appearance as the fumes produced at brass castings. Comparative Readings of Aneroid Métallique at different Temperatures at same Localities. 1855. Time. Locality. Fahr. |Aneroid. hm a Oct. 26.| 2 05 p.m. |Nebi Mousa ...... 89 | 77-17 8 00 P.M. ditto ......... 78 | 77°47 27.. 400 a.m. ditto ......+..| 67 | 77:50 |33 millims. in 22 degrees. 30.| 9 15 p.m. |Hebron ....... senes}p OO: (969527) 31. 8 15 a.m. CIGLO Men cnaaes 51 | 69°38 |11 millims. in 5 degrees. Nov. 1. 4 30 p.m. |Bed of Dervish...; 80 | 73°88 6 00 p.m. ditto, .c.cc0s..| @4 | £400 8 00 p.m. Cito} os. 6000-7 74 | 74:10 2.) 810 a.m. ditto ....... -.| 64 | 74°20 |32 millims. in 16 degrees. 12 35 a.m. Usdum ............ 89°5 | 80°06 7 30 P.M. CiGLO! renee - 76 | 80°41 |35 millims. in 135 degrees. 3.| 6 00 a.m. ditto”. .Gest.: 75 | 80°39 4.) 6 45 a.m. Gitto .....c vee 76 89°40 815 a.m. ditto .........| 79 | 80°44 5.) 845 a.m. GiktO! Saeewes- 79 | 80°62 lor 33°938 inches. 3 00 p.m. |Ghor ............0+ 90 | 80:10 5 10 P.M. ith O acne a 86 80°13 810 pM. ditto ........-| 85 | 80°22 |12 millims. in 5 degrees. Gale 6.|10 00 a.m. | CIGLO Vcnaeesn's 90 | 80-44) of wind. 8.| 3 35 p.m. ditto ........., 99 | 79°70 8 30 P.M. CUGLO) teowenesss 61 | 80:20 6 00 a.m. CIELO rc entes ce 60 | 80°24 |54 millims. in 33 degrees. | 6.| 430 p.m. El Lisan............ 72 \°79"99 12 15 p.m. ditto ......... 66 | 80°30|31 millims. in 6 degrees. Gale 7.| 10 25 a.m. | iLO MIA eos 81 | 80°31] of wind 8 p.m. 7 45 P.M. ditto) <.5....5. 73 | 80°30 8.) 645 a.m. GUE Gis. ccs 72 80°21 915 a.m. GittO jc. <00-0e. 86 | 79°94|27 millims. in 14 degrees. 9.) 7 30 p.m. Em Barghek ...... 83 | 79:83 10 15 a.m. ditto, .........| 83 | 79:90 10.} 1 30 a.m. GILEO o.. +200 81 | 79°96 6 30 a.m. ditto .......... 78 | 80:00 /10 millims. in 5 degrees. TRANSACTIONS OF THE SECTIONS. 43 Thermometrical Readings near the shore of the Dead Sea. = B orce a Fahr. Centigrade. of 2 Date. Time. Locality. DRE one = Remarks. point. 2 s| 3 Re ra = Dry. | Wet. | Ins. | Mills. 3 h. m. Astaire a) = Oct. 27) 5 30 a.m. |North of Dead|70| 64 (58°25 |21°11 {17°78 |-5148 |13-08 |-70 |Bulb wetted with Sea. Dead Sea water. Noy. 2.| 200 p.m. |Usdum......... 90| 71 |59-03 |32°22 |21°67 |-4732 |12°03 |-32|114 feet above 3.| 135 p.m. ditto..s2:. 87| 72 |62°40 |30°55 |22:22 |-5795 |14°72 |-45| Dead Sea. 4.) 9 30 am. ditto...... 82/65 (53°44 |27°78 |18°33 |-3905 | 9°93 |-35 11 40 a.m. |Em Barghek |84|66 [54°12 |28-89 |18-89 |-4023 |10°22 |-34 |281 feet ditto. 5.| 510 p.m. |Ghor ......... 86| 71°5|62°08 |30°00 |21-94 |-5795 |14°73 |-47 6.} 10 00 a.m. ditto...... 90| 67 |52°51 |32°22 |19°44 |-3519 | 8:94 |-25 11.| 8 45 a.m. |Sebbeh......... 82168 |58°48 |27°78 |20-00 |-4960 |12°60 |-45 |563 feet ditto. 2 00 p.m. ditto...... 90| 70 (57°40 32°22 |21°11 |-4668 |11°85 |-33 12.) 12 42 a.m. |Engedi......... 86| 74 |66-20 |30-00 |23°33 |-6106 |17-24 |-55 |710 feet ditto. 13.| 4 30 p.m. |Ain Terabeh.../84 67°5\54-95 |28°89 |19°72 |-4677 |11°87 |-40 |710 feet ditto. Comparative Observations at Alvaston, Derby. 1856. Aug. 3.) 200 p.m. |Alvaston ...... 84| 72 |64:08 |28°89 |22°22 |-6228 |15°82 |-54 |About 250 feet 5.| 11 00 a.m. ditto....../73| 64 |55°34 |22°78 |17-78 |'4768 |12°11 |-59 | above sea. Levellings by Aneroid Métallique from the Mediterranean Sea by Joppa, to Samaria, through Jerusalem. October 1855. eactet Hecht a Height in Eeiece 2 Names of Places. Lenekat eet, a Oz “Woppa, Hotell” a... 5.0 55.cccceecetsscesecvenes eebistcod| Mattias. 67 4 PGMA OL OSEPID sch seen dena-seaes-s-netwocctenecevock| twehasdees 93 114. ~=‘|Convent at Ramleh (Arimathea) Sobae soaeaes'scuee 230 244 17 HKuballe ptr dea sapescrrnstees dpe -~' Stine etek oboe 543 445 21 Bab Wiady, Aine cies ents sndioesscecerac cer ep «annens 965 857 | 221 ~=|Terebith Tree (Wady Beit Hanina) Sa twauiesvongens aaede ban 3 1232 21 Church Aboo Gosh (Emmaus) .......... sence esis: ee LOSS 1892 253 Ain Dilbeh ....... ppeeidan de aistiass <= pape ecenanvies santa 2024 2047 282 Bridge, Keulonich ............s0ssssscscseescsesees o| 1954 1527 31 Bottom of Hezekiah’s Pool, Jerusalem............ 26103* 2061 36 Valley of Mount Gibeon...............ssccecsceeeees| sevencees 2231 40 Bicrah ......... Sais ene saiseee Refine aserece Beaune 2254 42 Bethel ......... segura RbcgrevdaccchudsasedevcsevetassmenelWi ts sce ane 2401 45 Khafa arno ........ depen cuit aersiss staronets socttoss eicteltah om MR, cere 2200 463 |Ainy Bruk .......... Bamaeteas 6 biiicisis seeisiee aeetp eink = sb | MANE de atts 1766 48 Ain el Hara mich, “ Robber’s spring ”’...... Reeecal | pebentts vs 1803 50 Ridge near Singel .......0..0....ssseseceeeees Se cpaee sili Boda auec 2020 52 BlEmbbans.'* Mebowele?, \ asin. .-csccuns dove esctbevei| if ccdecs i3 1424 56 Mopiof Ein ye. - Samaebiaaae sits aenloeiasinysf'a sin Sac ce Gerais Wess SF 1640 58 Brook near Burin ...cec..ceeseeeeseeceerees eaaecncesl |p Mrassiekddbs 1290 64 Jacob’s Well .........c2eseeeee Boe ueeAcsecaesswacha| ese ubaices 1347 64 Summit of Mount Gerizim...............200.-0+ RaARAW uses eeitan 2408 65 Nablous, “‘ Shechem ” .............00... Reet |oa ineieicase ete 1464 “1 Wiadhy S@DAStICh cnetletengsseactapteetiancs cupioaies senile eons nan 800 Filles Summit of Hill Samarid-ccc.cesecscestcccccscscsseses|| aves eeeae 1233 72 Willd elon Sebastlehe cracecaystemteeetscsccceaec cree |") cenctce ss 1120 * The precise locality in Jerusalem to which Lieut. Lynch levelled is not known. 44 REPORT—1856. Levellings by Aneroid Métallique from Jerusalem through Hebron to the Dead Sea, compared with the level of the Mediterranean Sea at Joppa. November 1855. Height in Distance in Wanies of Places feet with Miles. . Mediter- ranean Sea. (0) Jerusalemjiat Hezekiah’s Pools ...° ... 206 Sie Oe eee eZOGT 2 Wilijabie: Ganinentyc0 as <5. ? bss Soci Svevtue docs ise ee ea eee 3 Rachel’s Tomb ... .. Peer reer ead! sei LTT 63 |Vale of Artas, at junction of ‘Wadies.. igs Gar easaig weceg hace AO ve DittosMeshallumisvhouse, sich: maesntsccet.css vasen ase gael) BESUO 7 8 9 = |Aqueduct at Pools of Solomon ... ... 21. se. eee vee 2144 Upper Pool ditto: 2h Stisdehe hs 0 302 Pecan aes ow Cena SHZZO Ridge ss. 28s seb Rates (Rodel itavquaee tenner ZOD 10 Wady em Bir, or ‘wells nae! Reve sisMauets iecabaNecel coc | Nene meee 13 UNO Go eee CE Ne he RCO LOM MN PORCH TEE econ cal) 2alIe 142s hamish secuece kes Silene Jessi" See teva sublease 17 Camp at Fiehran, near incareteas. Las, eda tie wel eae nee ee ED TombysaCaveorlVakpelani ys cseu) ce rietel less abcess] OS Abraham’s Oak; valley of Hshcol 7.05 | ssc een ces) veea|) nO? Aines Lin ... ... sen biaa gine session og Mi as| RO Temple ruins at Mann RaGhemaademiy Sal Lesa spe hee eee OD 19, “Hitidwe idee ube Fie Lat chy sd Wace ace) Se ee UOSeh | Valleyane euaeeest Uiewet Go Gl -teh kesctit eco tose: tesalaeoncuene 20 Ridge ... wane cco eddly aos)! eral ene 221 |Ruins of Ziph « on left hand a mile wes eras. ecel| 2eET! 242 |Ruins Em Sirkan... .. $s see! fysnensssee galt cel| pee 27 Birket el Kurmel (Carmel «. Be eee EL eeerriiorroalar hone! 29% |Ain Tawana... ... Wier eet rises ko sain mote aie prea onan ee |e 30 Ridge sree Ssesu pare eset Pensisca ta nestbacs, locnbe eos nimees manner Se.) |Ridzeig.s.) |}... wed) piesen Msaca: some lecesiesne] meee 33 ‘tame Camp of the Djahalins os een = ileal sno sare ee EE So). .|Birglalaca lsccwhusesss, 00%), .¢2200.es0 eatin tess Me seRb anual orl eon 38 IGG Ch ies nore made co sitacwe., << citsieseraieact bare Miss: Pe ceeete ie |) Tua BOP | |Wiadyowe. 2.‘ cccthiceapincces asceiece PMeaeimacee cae amen ne |. wie AQ: \Ridge’S... iw Sea) >> sew Watetethe eee) ane Mg deee ewe] eee 43 Wady el Mahras, o or + Drippings waa (ities ealecete | kel csete.a|panlainO 45 |Ridge ... .. Joa, Maa ae eT on neem tae mag, 46 Ermeli (view of Dead Sea) ». omer tib Wei aah scr, jn iil Up NEG Kp mieee. * cocm misSanm cca eoplegenoeeciaes toormmeicgucctie taal] ie Age, ) |Ridbeseuc.- fess ace settee censhs oonkh weieiiacs, tf sae. - rca geen eeLOO 49 Plain, ces sae pees Saiemetb eNO cay meee 931 50 Bed of Dervish fond a eh aby-saste-, das | cea pepenietaes 895 52 |Wady of Bazaar ... ... one h(esr he. Beh .cetoc. Mepeipitens| ame 533 |Passed near a supposed crater Pe, He en hhc 298 551 |Nejeb (view of Dead Sea) . dapactearcodyl ||PlavpaottBemobbersizsse)yesebaes stances chess eet | ant mee rae 1784 OMe Ridzerecwutens Macimmscsh <5o Wess pads Ader ces] ete 2068 | 12 |Road turns off to “‘ Nebi Mousa” ... ... ...| + 705 2018 Tb, |Apostles* fountain’ s25 ois. tre to cem Seve ose feos 2567 16 |Lazarus’s Tomb, Bethany... ... .. ... s.| +1803 3116 17. |Church of Ascension, Mount of Olives ... ...| +2138 3451 172 |Tomb of Virgin Mary, Valley of Jehoshaphat...) +1834 3147 18 |Hezekiah’s Pool, Jerusalem ... ... .- «| +2061 3374 Note.—Since the reading of the above paper before the British Association at Cheltenham, Mr. Poole has been in Westmoreland, and taken the heights of several mountains in the Lake District with the Aneroid Métallique. In the Table below, the first column shows the height by calculation, allowing 33°5 feet per millimetre as adopted by him in Palestine. The second column is cal- culated by Delcros’s formula, giving corrections for temperature and latitude. The third column shows the heights furnished by Colonel James, Chief of the Ordnance Survey of Great Britain, and which were obtained from him since the aneroid level- lings were calculated. The Ordnance survey thus confirms most satisfactorily the correctness of the aneroid, when corrected by Delcros’s formula, up to a height of 3000 feet. Unfortunately the temperatures at the time of observation were not kept in Pales- tine, and therefore Delcros’s formula cannot be now used for those readings, and the heights given in the original paper are proportionally too low Levellings by Aneroid Métallique in the Lake District, taken from Iveing Cottage, Ambleside, which is calculated at 80 feet above Windermere Lake (128 feet above the sea by Colonel James), or Station at 208 feet above the sea. September 1856. Colonel i i *5 feet nillimetre, with 208 feet Ss? James’ on Oy ede heght of Statiin( above the see ie aaeteth eriuatis Difference. Survey. Helvellyn ...s...seo0-.s00 COCR TIO TROOECE nestareeten 2734 3056 3117 —61 Fainheld cccntececeeeeetesereeetnscokccccorscssncecssiee 2566 2837 2861 — 24 Highstreet .........ccccccosesceeeecseseeeeceessreeceans 2452 2693 2722 —29 Wansfell (not quite at top, 30 feet assumed)...| 1524 1649 1598 +51 Kirkstone pass, boundary line .........+00-..e0eee 1400 1487 1466 +21 House at ditto ........+0006 BbeaRecs Atth bes ctiosis sees 1383 1490) Nekegae + 4 Loughrigg Fell, or Ewe Crag .........+++sssesee0 1032 1123 1101 +22 TRANSACTIONS OF THE SECTIONS. 47 On a Meteor seen at Cheltenham on Friday, August 8th. By the Rev. C. Prircuarp, F.R.S. The author stated, that on leaving the Meeting of the Association on Friday evening, about 8 P.m., the friend who was with him suddenly exclaimed, ‘There is lightning !”” But observing that the light continued, he turned round, and saw a beautiful meteor moving, nearly in a vertical circle, nearly through « Lyre,—com- mencing about eight diameters of moon below & Lyre, and extending through about ten diameters,—commencing, in fact, in a line drawn through Jupiter and the lower of the three stars in Aquila. It was very decided and persistent, with rose- coloured scintillations, taking a serpentine course, and lasting for fully forty seconds. No further meteors were observed that night ; but on the following night he observed six others, about the same hour,—all having their vanishing points near, or below, the horizon, and, in the vertical circle, through @ Lyre. The former meteor was seen by other friends, and also at Tewkesbury, and its decided persistency and violet colour remarked upon at the time. Continuation of Meteorological Observations for 1855, at Huggate, Yorkshire. By the Rev. T. Rankin. The atmospheric wave of November was twelve days in passing ; coldest day, 13°, February 18; hottest day, 73°, July 13; lowest point of the barometer, 28°160, March 3; highest point, 30°460 ; rain, 23°570 inches ; eclipse of the sun visible only a few seconds ; in the evening a large meteor exploded and discharged coloured scin- tillations like a rocket. On the evening of October 21, the whole atmosphere had the appearance of the hull of a ship, with the white planks all distinct from stem to stern. The ends were N.W. and S.E. The N.W. end was like pieces of amber, and the S.E. end a beautiful purple. The common observation of the oldest labourers is, that when the wind blows across the ends of the ship, heavy rain will soon come. In the present case, the wind blew obliquely across the ends, and, according to the common prognostic, there was soon a heavy fall of rain. Winds: E., 11 days; W., 36 days; N., 5 days; N.E., 39 days; N.W., 30 days; S.E., 6 days; S.W., 25 days. Weather: clear days, 117; rain, 51; frost, 28; white frost, 29; snow, 18; mist, 7; fog, 4; thunder, 8 days. On a Thermometer for Measuring Fluctuations of Temperature. By B. Stewart. Communicated and described by Mr. Wetsu. If a bulb be blown between two thermometric glass tubes of unequal bores, and the instrument be filled with mercury in the same manner as an ordinary thermo- meter, and laid horizontal or nearly so, it will be found that contractions from cold take place only in the narrow bore, and expansions from heat only in the wide one. The reason of this seems to be, that while the temperature remains the same the mercury is kept at rest, and prevented from retreating from the small bore into the bulb, by friction; but when a motive force is supplied by a change of temperature, the motion of the mercury takes place in that direction in which it is most aided by capillary action. It was suggested by Mr. Welsh to the author that such an instrument might be used to measure fluctuations of temperature. And the author thinks it might be applied to measure- with exactness the power of a source of radiant heat; for, by alternately interposing a screen between this instrument and the source of heat, and withdrawing the same screen, the effect of the source on the mercury would be multiplied by the number of times this operation was performed. In constructing such an instrument, care must be taken that the tubes used are quite free from dirt or moisture, and that they are not bent, but form one straight line, the bulb being in the middle, and swelling out symmetrically from both its extremities. The best proportion between the capacities of the bores is perhaps about 1 to 4, and the best arrangement of bores seems to be one suggested by Mr. Welsh, viz. a round bore for the wide tube, and a flat or elliptical bore for the narrow one, the greatest diameter of which equals the diameter of the wide bore. In graduating, if, when the instrument is vertical, the narrow bore being beneath, the mercury fills 48 REPORT—1856. the bulb and rises in the wide bore, then the wide bore may be pointed off at differ- ent temperatures like an ordinary thermometer ; but if under these circumstances the mercury does not rise in the wide bore, then, in order to point off the wide bore, the instrument must be laid horizontally in a dish of water, and compared with a standard thermometer at different temperatures; the extremity of the mercury in the narrow bore being always kept at a fixed point. When the wide bore has been pointed off, we may, by running the mercury along, find what length of the narrow bore corresponds to a certain length of the wide one, and thus be enabled to point off the narrow bore. In using the instrument it should be kept nearly horizontal, and there is probably for each instrument a small range of inclination, for every position within which its peculiar action holds, but beyond which it is interfered with by gravity. Before graduating such an instru- ment it should be ascertained whether it is likely to answer, and the best test seems to be to lay it horizontal, exposing it to changes of temperature of the same nature with those which it is intended afterwards to measure ;—if its action be per- fect, the mercury will eventually be found to have retreated into the bulb from the narrow bore; but should it have stopped at any point, the action will only be perfect up to that point. If this demands too much time, it may be tested by repeatedly applying to the bulb of an instrument so placed a few drops of slightly warmed water, On the Climate of Torquay and South Devon. By E. Vivian, M.A. Mr. E. Vivian, of Torquay, laid before this Section the statistics of the meteoro- logy of Torquay and Sonth Devon contrasted with those of the average of England, as given in the Reports of the Registrar-General, to which he is a contributor. The observations on which they were based extended from 1842 to 1856, but the com- parative statement was confined to the last six years. The following was the general summary :— 5 3 3 3 $2... 0S a -0- ie ee en mf S28) 82 |f2|88/88| os | e4 [s8c] 2s | gs $3 |/-353 |.85 om | fs oa | sca as| SE O-m sa|5a|/sa)/sSse/ SS | Se | oe |27 Be | sve Be eg ee eee a Bl situs a a = A o 2414 s o fe} fe} io} ° Torquay...| 50:°3| 76 | 27 | 99] 15 | 155 | 278| 34 | -9 | -76 England...| 483 | 83 | 15 | 145 | 46 | 170 | 255 | 3:4 | -7 | -82 He explained the principles upon which the cool summers and mild winters of South Devon and Cornwall are to be accounted for, namely, the equable tempera- ture of the sea with which the peninsula is surrounded. He had observed the surface water in Torbay to be as much as 21 degrees above the minimum tempe- rature of the air in winter, and 13 degrees below the maximum in summer. He also accounted for the equable hygrometrical condition of the air by the same cause—-the temperature of the sea being frequently above the dew-point in winter and below it in summer. He reviewed the inaccuracies in several medical pub- lications, which had raised a prejudice against South Devon as a summer residence as being too relaxing, while the exact contrary is shown by these observations. He exhibited a set of his newly invented meteorological instruments for obtaining all the really important elements of climate by one daily, weekly, or monthly obser- vation, especially self-registering hygrometers; one for the maximum and minimum difference of the wet- and dry-bulb thermometers, the other for registering their average difference during any period of time, ——— TRANSACTIONS OF THE SECTIONS, 49 Instructions for the Graduation of Boiling-point Thermometers, intended Sor | the Measurement of Heights. By J. Wetsu. Let the thermometer be in the first instance filled with a sufficient quantity of mercury to allow the point 82° Fahr. to be where the point 212° is desired ulti- mately to be. Let a chamber be made at the top of the tube about 3 inches above the point 212°; or, if the thermometer is required to have a chamber at the top when finally completed, let there be two chambers made with sufficient space between them to allow of the tube being there sealed by a blowpipe flame. By comparison with a standard thermometer, set off the points 82°, 72°, 62°, 52°, 42° (but not 32°). The scale may then be divided, adopting the mark 82 as corresponding to 212:00; 72 to 201°87 ; 62 to 191°74 ; 52 to 181°61; 42 to 171°48. The graduation of the scale should then be verified by comparison with a standard thermometer at different points from 37° to 87° Fahr., and a table of errors of graduation thus obtained. A sufficient quantity of mercury must now be separated from the main mass until the top of the column stands in boiling water at the proper reading. The superfluous mercury having been lodged in the upper chamber, may be removed by sealing up the tube between the two chambers. If it is not possible to detach exactly the proper quantity of mercury to make the column stand at the true temperature of boiling water, the difference should be added as a further constant correction to the table already found by comparison with the standard. The following determination of the corrections to a thermometer, constructed on this principle by Messrs. Negretti and Zambra, will serve as an example of the accuracy which may be attained by this method.— Reading of Boiling- * Standard Reading point Thermometer. tne Final of : after correc- Standard. Observed: ast a Withdrawal} tion. at 212°, | of mercury. ° 42-00 171-76 | 17161 | 17-48 | —-13 47:00 176°80 176°65 176°54 —'ll 52°00 181°85 181°70 181:61 —'09 57:00 186°99 186°84 186°67 —17 62:00 191°97 191°82 191°74 —'08 67:00 196°98 196°83 196°80 —'03 72:00 202-08 201°93 201:87 —°06 77:00 207°19 207°04 207:94 —'10 82°00 212°29 212°14 212:00 —'14 On Barometrical and Thermometrical Observations at Scarborough. By Captain Woopatt, M.A. CHEMISTRY. On the Composition of Parafine from different sources. By Taomas ANDERSON, M.D., F.R.S.E. Regius Professor of Chemistry in the University of Glasgow. Some seven years since the author commenced the investigation of Rangoon petro- leum, but being at the time engaged in other researches, the subject was abandoned after some experiments and analyses of the paraffine it contains had been made, More recently his attention had been directed to this substance in examining the paraffine obtained during the distillation of coal. He found that Boghead coal yields two distinct kinds of paraffine, one highly crystalline after fusion, the other a granular 1856. 4 50 REPORT—1856. mass resembling bleached wax. The former melted at 114° Fahr., the latter at 126°. That obtained from Rangoon petroleum melted at 142°, and from peat at 116°. All these varieties gave on analysis the same results, the numbers obtained being— Coal. rn ey Crystalline. Granular. Er ote str SS Carbon .....s.00- 85°08 85°14 85°12 85°09 85:28 85:00 Hydrogen ....,.... 15°33 15°11 oe 15°23 15°38 15:36 100°41 100°25 100°32 100-66 100°36 Peat. Rangoon Petroleum. maa Carbon,...sseceesessrers 85°23 84°95 85°15 Hydrogen ....... sgetee, LODLG 15°05 15°29 100°39 100-00 100:44 These analyses lead to the conclusion that all varieties of paraffine are nof carbo- hydrogens of the CnHy series, as is commonly supposed, but lend support to Lewy’s view, according to which some of them belong to the CnHn+, series. This is rendered obvious by the comparison of the mean analytical result with the calculation for the former series and for the formula C4)H4, which comes very close to the analytical results. Expt. Calculation. pe : CH CygH ag Carbone cesses sbsess 85:10 85°71 85°10 Hydrogen ......... 15°23 14:29 14:90 100°33 100°00 100-00 The latter formula is a purely empirical one, and is simply the nearest approach to the experimental numbers, which, however, might be equally well expressed by Cy.H 44, or even C,,H4g. The author has tried in vain to obtain some means of determining the rational formule of the different paraffines, but without success. They are all acted upon by chlorine with the formation of turpentine-like substitution compounds, in which the proportion of chlorine differs, The author leaves it an open question whether these paraffines are radicals or the hydrurets of radicals, his object being to show that the term paraffine has a very wide acceptation, embracing not only the cerotene and melene obtained from wax, which belong to the CnHn series, but also a great variety of other compounds. On a new combination of Carbon, Oxygen and Hydrogen, formed by the Oxidation of Graphite; and on the Appearance of Carbon under the Mi- croscope. By Professor Bronir, F.R.S. On the Incrustations of Blast Furnaces. By Professor F. Cracz Catvert, F.C.S. During a journey which I made twelve months ago in Shropshire, in which I visited certain iron-works, my attention was drawn to large incrustations which gradually formed at the mouth of blast furnaces, and which had acquired such a size as nearly to shut up the mouth of the furnaces, and as they proved a great annoyance, it was thought proper that they should be removed. To do this, the mass in the furnace was allowed to fall eight or ten feet from the mouth of the furnace, the blast was then taken off and the incrustations removed, some of which were placed in my hands for analysis, and which I found to be com posed as follows ;— CORIGELOUZIIC. «os: -s ss ue 6 oy O4I05 Peroxide of iron. .. '. «| ° 2:10 Miccamees nt | ol? Oe TA rgea5 Carine Se a 2) Seog gdm Rach Measee 0) 100°00 TRANSACTIONS OF THE SECTIONS. 51 -” As the presence of zine was the souree of very great injury to the iron-master, not only in consequence of its forming incrustations, but also on account of a certain ‘quantity of it finding its way into the cast iron and thereby rendering it very brittle, I was requested by the proprietor of these furnaces to examine the various mate- rials that were employed, and try to find out in which of them existed the compound of zinc which gave rise to these several incrustations, ee . Having failed to discover any blende or calamine in the limestone used, I next examined the iron ores, and found that the ‘under penny-stone’ (a name given in Shropshire to the ironstone nodules which are employed there nearly exclusively) con- tained small black crystals, which proved, on analysis, to be sw/phuret of zine or blende. Since this observation was made by me, E. W. Binney, Esq., F.R.S., has placed a very interesting paper in my hands (published in 1852), in which he describes the presence of the sulphurets of lead and zinc “as existing in the druses or hollows of ironstone nodules occurring in coal-measures, which seem to indicate that metals had in some instances been precipitated from aqueous solutions, or segregated from semifluid masses.” But it would appear probable, from the recent researches of Messrs. Fremy, Deville, and Senarmont, that the blende has formed itself in the druses by the action ‘of a volatile sulphuret on the oxide of zine which had been deposited in those druses after they had been formed in the ironstone. In examining the coals employed, I found in the lowest strata which bear the name of “Court Bandles Coal’’ in the neighbourhood of Coalbrook Dale, a large quantity of white metallic scales disseminated through the mass of coals, exactly in the same manner as pyrites are observed in the same substance. The presence of such scales having not yet been observed, I analysed them, and found them to be composed of alena mixed with a little blende. I think that the presence of the blende and galena in the iron mineral and in the coals, clearly indicates that in the neighbourhood there must be veins or lodes of the sulphurets of these two metals. On the Salts actually present in the Cheltenham and other Mineral Waters. By J. H. Guapstonz, PA.D., F.R.S, The Cheltenham waters have been analysed by many distinguished chemists, and the experiments of Messrs. Abel and Rowney leave nothing to be desired in point of accuracy, that is to say, as far as the amounts of chlorine, carbonic acid, soda, lime, &e. are concerned; but the author contended that the usual method of arranging the results of analysis, as so much chloride of sodium, so much carbonate of lime, &c., was utterly fallacious. The rule of ‘combining the strongest base with the strongest acid’ is purely empirical, and almost incapable of application, since our knowledge is very vague as to which is stronger and which weaker; but the rule is also false, if it be true, as the author has found it to be wherever proof was possible, that ‘‘ where two or more binary compounds are mixed under such circumstances that all the resulting bodies are free to act and react, each electro-positive element arranges itself in combination with each electro-negative element in certain constant proportions.” The method of determining the salts actually present in a water by evaporating it down and exhausting the residue successively with ether, alcohol and water, is also fallacious, for the state of combination of the acids and bases may materially alter when crystallization is taking place. The paper of Messrs. Abel and Rowney contains indications that the salts are not actually present in the Cheltenham waters in the manner in which they are arranged in their lists of analyses. Thus so carefully had these chemists experimented, that they observed there was not sufficient free carbonic acid to retain in solution the lime and magnesia which, according to the usual principles, they supposed present in the form of carbonates. Hence they imagined them dissolved by the alkaline salts, and add, “‘ We have satisfied ourselves by direct experiment, that the solubility of car- bonate of lime is much increased by the presence of chloride of sodium and sulphate of soda.” Now all this is the necessary consequence of the law of reciprocal affinity, as the lime, instead of monopolizing the carbonic acid, will unite more or less with the other acids present, forming salts soluble in water. : The author was fully aware that analytical. chemists themselves did not profess the 4% 52 REPORT—1856. method complained of to be absolutely correct; but he feared that the semi-scientific and the general public were deceived by it, and that chemists also often came to believe there was some truth in their own arbitrary mode of expressing the results of analysis. Notes on Nitroglycerine. By J. H. Guavsronz, Ph.D., F.R.S. The author had made several observations on this remarkable explosive liquid, which had been first exhibited by Dr. De Vrij at the Ipswich meeting of the Associa- tion; but the recent research of Mr, Railton had forestalled him, and left little for him to bring before the public. However, he felt convinced that nitroglycerine was not always uniform in its properties, and was perhaps various in its composition. Thus a liquid produced by immersing glycerine (in the hydrated state in which it is found in commerce) in a mixture of one part of fuming nitric acid and three parts of sulphuric acid, was found to be easily exploded by a blow with a hammer, or when heated rather strongly in a test-tube, giving rise to much flame and noise, with the evolution of much nitrous gas ; while a liquid produced in a precisely similar manner from the same glycerine, but after it had heen rendered anhydrous, did not explode by a blow with a hammer, and burnt without noise when very strongly heated. Again, some explosive nitroglycerine was allowed to decompose spontaneously till only about one-half was left; this remaining portion was non-explosive. Each variety, when exposed to a bath of solid carbonic acid in alcohol, froze, becoming at first viscous, and then assuming an appearance similar to that of the fatty acids at the ordinary temperature. This substance, like other nitrous acid substitution products, is liable to slow spontaneous decomposition. ‘This had been several times observed : one spe- cimen exposed for some weeks to the light of the summer sun, gave off abundance of red fumes, and separated into two liquids, between which long crystals of oxalic acid formed. The upper liquid contained the products of decomposition, being in fact an aqueous solution of nitric and oxalic acids, with a large quantity of ammonia, a little prussic acid, and traces of two or three slightly acid or neutral bodies, which could not be identified. On the Conversion of Tannin into Gallic Acid. By Joan Horstey. It is several years since I first noticed the facts which I now bring before your notice. I have never yet heard or read of the practical application of the agent in the manufacture of gallic acid in the manner I now suggest. Every chemist is aware that the quantity of gallic acid naturally contained in the gall-nut is very small compared with the tannin (alias tannic acid), and that the gallic acid of commerce is a manufactured article, being obtained by what is called the fer- mentation process, which consists in the saturation of the bruised galls with water and exposing the mass to the air for a period of several weeks or even months, when decomposition sets in, a mould collects, and small yellow crystals of gallic acid are observable, evidently the result of the oxidation of the tannin. The gallic acid is then dissolved out by boiling the mass in water, and crystallizes from the concentrated liquid on cooling. It occurred to me to make experiments by keeping powdered galls in contact for some time with liquid acids, such as sulphuric, sulphurous, nitric, and acetic acids, but with diluted sulphuric acid only did I perceive any change produced; small white tufts or nodules of gallic acid being observed soon to protrude themselves, so to speak, to the surface of the dried cake. I have lately, for the purpose of drawing up this paper, made further experiments, of which these are specimens. I merely moistened the powdered galls with the diluted acid and exposed the mixture in an evaporating dish to the full action of the sun, and in a few hours signs of intestine motion began to manifest themselves and crystalline white tufts were forming ; these white tufts gradually increased from day to day, and became more apparent as the mass dried. It is necessary to renew the application of moisture from time to time, so as to promote the growth of gallic acid. In proof of the above, I likewise treated pure tannin by triturating it with dilute sulphuric acid, and in a very short time white crystalline tufts of gallic acid were visible. tiene eeemaiiomeal TRANSACTIONS OF THE SECTIONS. 53. A New Method of instituting post-mortem researches for Strychnia. By Joun Horstey. The following will be found an exceedingly simple and successful method of obtaining strychnia, in cases where it is practicable, from the tissues of the body. The weather at the time of making these experiments being very hot, the effluvia evolved from so much putrefying animal matter, induced me to adopt some means for remedying the annoyance. I therefore thought of a solution of ordinary chloride of lime (bleaching liquid), but fearing lest that agent should decompose or destroy the strychnia, I first tried its effect on a weak acetic solution of strychnia, and was surprised to find that a milky white precipitate of a chloride, possibly a hypochlorite of strychnia, ensued, insoluble even on the addition of a large quantity of acetic acid. This precipitate, when drained on a filter and dried, is freely soluble in alcohol, which seems to be its best spirituous solvent, but did not readily dissolve in dilute sulphuric acid even with the aid of heat. Its best acid solvent is glacial acetic acid. It is also soluble in alkaline liquors. This result gave me such confidence, that I at once proceeded to operate on animal matter. I therefore took some of the putrid liquid in which the liver of a dog poisoned by strychnia had been boiled, which liver had not hitherto yielded me any strychnia. I purposely introduced a little of the alkaloid, boiled the whole a few minutes, and when cold, added the liquid chloride of lime in excess, or till all soluble matter (animal or otherwise) was precipitated, and then filtered it through a cloth, No trace of bitterness could be detected in the liquor. The drained precipitate of fibrine, gelatine, caseine, and strychnia was next dried, in a water-bath, then powdered, digested in alcohol acidified with acetic acid, heated, filtered, and evaporated to the consistency of a syrup: by this time the whole of the smell of chlorine will have been given off, and acetate of strychnia obtained, which can be purified in the usual way, by precipitation with an alkali, &c. Testing for Strychnia, Brucia, §c. By Joun Horsey. The author tried the effects of a precipitant formed of one part of bichromate of potash dissolved in fourteen parts of water, to which were added afterwards two parts in bulk of strong sulphuric acid, upon a solution of strychnine, which was entirely precipitated in the form of a beautiful golden-coloured insoluble chromate. The decolorization of a solution of either the chromate or bichromate of potash was effected by gradually adding a solution of the acetate of strychnia, when chromate of strychnia was precipitated. Scarcely a trace of bitterness was left in the filtered liquor. The author claimed as his own, this mode of the application of the chromic salt and the acid. He diluted thirty drops of a solution containing half a grain of strychnia with four drachms of water. When six drops ofa solution of bichromate of potash were added, at each drop crystals were at once formed, and the decomposition was complete when the whole were mixed together. Though the half-grain of strychnia was split up into millions of atomi¢ crystals, each atom as effectually demonstrated the chemical properties of the poison asa pound in weight could have done. The chemical reaction with these crystals was next shown by spreading out a drop of the liquid chromate of strychnia upon an evaporating dish, and adding a drop or two of strong sulphuric acid. Amorphous chromate of strychnia may be obtained from neutral chromate of potash ; nacreous or crystalline, from the bichromate; and, thirdly, in the regular crystalline state with a weak chromic acid solution : fine spiculz are first formed, and next (which is the peculiar characteristic of strychnia) small cubic crystals studding the sides of the glass. The salts of brucia and of lead alone appear to afford results in anywise similar, The chromates of strychnia and of brucia become (contrary to that of lead) dark coloured by exposure to sunlight. Chromate of strychnia is changed to deep purple, and then to violet and red on appli- cation of sulphuric acid. But chromate of brucia shows only an orange-red colour; and being more soluble, no crystals can be obtained by means of the weak acid solution mentioned. Chromate of lead also is in the amorphous or powdery state, and developes no colour with sulphuric acid. ; The following new tests disprove the fallacy entertained, that the non-detection of strychnia in the body of J. P. Cooke was owing to the presence of antimony. Mix one part of a saturated solution of the yellow cyanide of potassium (12 grains 54. REPORT—1856. : to each drachm of water) with two parts of solution of acetate of strychnia; or take thirty drops of solution of strychnia diluted with sixty or ninety drops of water ; drop in one minim only of the ferrocyanide of potassium, and agitate the mixture, and an abun- dance of minute yellowish-white crystals of the ferrocyanide of strychnia is formed. Again, lay a little of the dried ferrocyanide of strychnia upon a small portion of pow- dered protosulphate of iron ; drench both with water ; the deep blue of the iron is first shown: add one or two drops of strong sulphuric acid, and then stir in a minute portion of powdered chromate of potash ; the purple and violet colour of strychnia at once appears. In the next test, a solution of the ammonio-sulphate of copper is discoloured by gradually adding a solution of strychnia and by boiling the mixture; crystals of strychniate of copper with a little ammonia will be formed ; decolorize these when dry, by sulphuric acid; add chromate of potash ground in by a glass rod, and strychnia will be revealed. On a New Method of extracting the Alkaloids Strychnia and Brucia from Nux Vomica without Alcohol. By Joun Hoxrstey. The usual modes of obtaining strychnia from nux vomica are, besides being more or less expensive owing to the alcohol used, far from satisfactory. his, in a toxico- logical point of view, is particularly the case, on account of the small quantity of strychnia naturally contained in the nut; and as the production of the alkaloid for its characteristic colour-test is a matter of importance, I have been induced to make several experiments on the different methods in use, and it appears to me that the simplest and best is that which I now propose, viz. to make an acetic extract by kneading up, say a quarter of a pound of nux vomica with an equal quantity of com- mercial acetic acid, and thinning the pulpy mass with two or three pints of cold water, allowing it to digest for a few days. The clear liquor must then be decanted off and an equal quantity of fresh water poured on the mass to digest for a day or two longer, or till all soluble matter is extracted. The clear liquor is then to be decanted, and the remainder thrown on a flannel filter. The liquid which passes through should be mixed with the former decanted liquors and evaporated to a syrupy consistence (about three or four ounces). When this is cold, dilute it with an equal quantity of water, add liquor ammoniz in excess, and set it by for a day or two that the strychnia may crystallize out, which is known by thie various little white tufts which collect within the fluid as well as on the sides of the glass vessel. When the crystallization is complete, the dark green supernatant fluid is to be passed through a calico filter ; and the residuum with the crystals adhering to the vessel collected thereon, must be left to drain; the dark green mass consisting of strychnia and brucia with resinoid matter is next to be scraped off and well dried in a water-bath, digested in hot diluted acetic acid, and the solution filtered. The strychnia and brucia may be thrown down by potassa, or the strychnia only by the addition of a solution of chromate of potassa, when a chromate of strychnia will be obtained free from brucia provided the solution which retains the brucia be tolerably acid. This chromate of strychnia being collected on a filter and well drained, can easily be dechromatized by digestion in liq. ammoniz, and the strychnia obtained of a more or less snowy whiteness. The quantity of strychnia actually contained in the nux vomica has not, I believe, been accurately ascertained, at least if I may judge from Professor Taylor’s work on Poisons, where that gentleman represents it at about =, or 3 a grain per cent. I cannot help thinking that the exhaustion in that case must have been but imperfectly performed, as my own experiments show that nearly twice that quantity is capable of being extracted ; for in my first concentration of the liquor from a quarter of a pound of nux vomica I obtained as follows :— From the Ist concentration 11 grains of strychnia ” 2nd ” a ” 3) 21, » ord ¥. 2 ” ” 17 grains. _ This difference in quantity is necessary to be borne in mind by the medical prac- — titioner when prescribing the extract and other preparations of nux vomica. TRANSACTIONS OF THE SECTIONS. © 55 Experiments on Animals with Strychnia, and probable reasons for the non- detection of the Poison in certain cases. By Joun Horstey. The author next related his experiments on three white rats with strychnine. To each rat was given a quarter of a grain of powdered strychnia. In little more than an hour a quarter-grain dose was given to the largest rat, and in about another hour half a grain more was given to the same animal. At 4 o’clock the next morning they were all alive, having eaten bread and milk, but shortly after 7 o’clock they were all dead, one having lived just twelve hours after taking the quarter-grain dose. In about three hours afterwards not the least indication of strychnine could be obtained by the usual tests, and all traces of bitterness were lost. Every portion of their bodies gave the same negative results, Was, then, the strychnia decomposed in the organism, and its nature changed, as Liebig intimated? The strychnine might have been absorbed into the albumen or other solid animal matter, and thus abstracted from the fluid, forming perhaps by coagulation in the blood, a solid albuminate as in the case of the glairy white of egg with strychnia, the full quantity of the alkaloid not being recoverable. In his second experiment the author gave full three-quarters of a grain to a wild tat, which was killed by a dog four or five days afterwards, exhibiting but little of the effects of the poison; the palms of the feet having cedematous swellings, and one of the fore-feet being contracted. Inthe third experiment, Mr. H. yave a pill of two grains of strychnia wrapped in blotting-paper, to a full-sized terrier dog. It was ap- parently well for at least five hours, but in the morning was found dead, as though asleep. When taken up, blood flowed freely from its mouth. The right ventricle and auricle of the heart contained no blood; the left was full of partly liquid, partly clotted blood. The stomach was detached with both orifices closed. On incision, the paper wrapper, so far from being reduccd to a pulp by the action of the stomach, was found in the same state as when the pill was given, and contained nearly all the strychnine. .. None of the absorbed strychnia could be detected in the blood or elsewhere after the most careful experiments. Mr. H. subsequently made experiments proving the great probability that a more or less insoluble compound of organic or animal matter is found in combination with strychnia. On the Products and Composition of Wheat-Grain. By J. B. Lawes, F.R.S., and Dr. Giupert. On the Detection of Strychnine. By Srevenson Macavan, Ph.D., F.RS.E., F.C.S., Lecturer on Chemistry in the Medical School, Surgeons’ Hall ; in the School of Arts ; and to the Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, Edin- burgh. Four points were sought to be determined by the present investigation. (1) Can strychnine which has been administered as a poison be thereafter detected in the animal system ? (2) Will antimony, morphine, coniine, or other chemical agent, conceal strychnine, when such has been given to the animal ? (3) Will time, with its host of putrefying agents, so far destroy strychnine as to render its detection unlikely or impossible? And (4) Can strychnine which has been given to the animal in minimum doses remain in its organism in such quantity as afterwards to be isolated and recognized? In examining animal matter for strychnine, the author has found the following process eminently serviceable, and confidently commends it to the notice of analysts -as a method which can be depended upon. ‘The animal matter, when solid, is chopped into minute fragments, and treated with a dilute solution of oxalic acid. After stand- ing twenty-four hours, during which time the mass is repeatedly agitated, the whole is filtered through muslin. The contents of the filter are well washed with water, and the washings added to the filtrate. The liquid so obtained is heated to ebullition, -when albuminous matters separate, and whilst warm, is filtered through paper. Ani- 4 56 7 REPORT—1856. mal charcoal is added to the filtrate, and, after repeated agitation during twenty-four hours, the supernatant liquid is decanted off, and the charcoal received on a paper filter, where it is well washed with cold water. ‘The charcoal now retaining the strychnine is allowed to dry spontaneously, thereafter placed in a flask, drenched with alcohol, and the whole kept for two hours at a temperature short of ebullition. The alcoholic extract is separated by filtration from the charcoal, and is evaporated down to dryness in a porcelain vessel, at a water-bath heat. The residue so obtained will generally be found in a fit condition to be at once tested for strychnine, by means of bichromate of potash and sulphuric acid; but should such not be the case, a few drops of oxalic acid solution are again added, and the process repeated from the action of charcoal onwards. Proceeding in this manner, the author has many times suc- ceeded in detecting strychnine in the various organs of an animal destroyed by means of it. In a few instances, hydrochloric acid and acetic acid were severally employed instead of the oxalic acid, but were found unsuitable. Tartaric acid, however, gives results equally successful with those yielded by oxalic acid. When this investigation commenced, it was still an open question as to the possi- bility of strychnine being absorbed and retained in the animal system. Accordingly, in the first trials, large doses were gradually given, so as to afford every chance of the strychnine being afterwards found. A Horse received 24 grains of strychnine in small doses at repeated intervals during one hour and fifty minutes, when a large dose of 12 grains was given. Tetanus came on in two hours from the commencement of the experiment, and the animal died in one minute thereafter. Strychnine was detected in (1) the contents of the stomach, (2) the muscle, (3) the blood, and (4) the urine. A large Police Deg partook of four bread pills, each containing ?,th of a grain of strychnine, at intervals of about a quarter of an houreach. In fifteen minutes after- wards 3 grains of strychnine were given, and in other fifteen minutes another dose of 3 grains. Tetanic spasms commenced in one hour and forty-five minutes after the first dose was administered, and the animal died in thirteen minutes. Strychnine was found in (1) the intestines, (2) the blood, (3) urine, and (4) muscle. The other parts of this animal were not examined. Three Mice were poisoned with strychnine by the author's assistant, Mr, John J. J, Kyle, whoafterwards examined them according to Stas’ process, substituting chloroform for ether. He detected the alkaloid in the stomachs and intestines thrown together, but not in the muscle and other organs. The suggestion lately advanced, that antimony and other substances are capable of destroying, retaining, or concealing strychnine, when such has been administered as a poison, does not seem to possess any foundation. A White Dog which had been under treatment with tartar emetic for four days, receiving four ;th of a grain doses each day, was poisoned with 1 grain of strychnine, and died in forty minutes; and, when tested, the poison was found in every organ. A Black Dog, similarly treated with tartar emetic, received 13 grain of strychnine along with 12 grains of extract of hem- lock, died in one hour and two minutes, and when examined yielded evidence of the poison having passed into neatly every part of its system. A Terrier Dog, poisoned by 13 grain strychnine and 8 drops coniine, gave the same positive result. A Cat, to which half a grain of strychnine and 2 grains of muriate of morphia were given, died in fifty-six minutes, and afforded evidence of strychnine in six different parts. The effect of time in causing the destruction of the strychnine has also occupied the attention of the author. Several parts of the Horse which had been buried for four weeks, as also other parts which had lain above ground for three weeks, including the stomach itself, and which were in an advanced stage of decomposition, on being tested, showed the presence of strychnine. A Duck also poisoned by strychnine, and which lay above ground for three and a half weeks (by which time maggots in abundance were crawling in and through it), yielded strychnine. Further, the remains of a Dog destroyed two and a half years ago by strychnine, as also those of another Dog poi- soned three and a half years ago by the same substance, still yielded satisfactory indi- cations of the agent by means of which they came by their death. As strychnine, like other organic substances, is liable to change in the animal systein, it is of importance to know how far minimum doses may be given which in days may prove fatal and yet be thereafter discovered. A Skye Terrier received 3th of TRANSACTIONS OF THE SECTIONS, 57 a grain of strychnine, was seized with tetanus in three hours, died in twelve hours, and notwithstanding the smallness of the dose, and the length of time the vital powers could act upon it, yet strychnine was satisfactorily discovered in all the more im- portant organs. Again, a Terrier Dog was fed on the flesh of the horse for four- teen days, received each day 2lbs. of food undoubtedly containing strychnine, lived and thrived on the poisoned flesh, and when afterwards destroyed by strychnine (un- fortunately so), yielded such a comparatively large proportion of strychnine, that the author came to the conclusion that this excess of strychnine must have been stored up in the tissues of the animal whilst it was partaking of the flesh of the horse, containing the minimum of minimum of doses of strychnine. In summing up these remarks on the detection of strychnine, the author deduces from the results of the experiments, the following conclusions :— (1) That, when administered to the animal, strychnine is absorbed and retained in its system. (2) That strychnine is not sensibly destroyed in the animal system during life, nor by the partial decomposition of the animal tissue consequent on death. (3) ‘That minimum doses of strychnine may cause the animal to exhibit but par- tially, or not at all, the physiological effects, but such doses are the most favourable for the chemist; so that, as the physiological evidence decreases, or sinks to a mini- mum, the chemical proof increases or rises to a maximum. (4) That tartar emetic, muriate of morphia, extract of hemlock, and coniine, may retard or relieve the spasms, but they do not in the slightest degree hinder the chemi- cal isolation and detection of strychnine. (5) That, by proper treatment, strychnine can be separated from organized tissue and organic matter in general, as easily as any other poison—arsenic not excepted— and much more easily than most other poisonous substances. (6) That, when isolated, strychnine can be distinguished by a special test, which is unerring and most delicate, and which will detect the merest trace. (7) That the decomposition or natural decay of the animal frame may in ages cause the complete destruction of the strychnine; but in this, time will no more easily blot out all traces of strychnine than it will obliterate the mark of the knife of the assassin, On a Series of Descriptive Labels for Mineral Collections in Public Institu- tions. By the Rev. W. Mitcue.t and Prof. J. TENNANT. Note on the Alkaline Emanations from Sewers and Cesspools. By WiuLiam Ovurne, M.B., F.C.S., L.R.C.P., Professor of Practical Chemistry, &c., Guy’s Hospital. Sewer and cesspool water was distilled. The powerfully alkaline distillate was supersaturated with hydrochloric acid, and precipitated with bichloride of platinum in the usual manner, The resulting platinum salt was crystallized, and then burnt with chromate of lead. The liberation of a large amount of carbonic acid proved the car- boniferous character of the alkali. The platinum salt yielded the same per-centage of platinum as the platino-chloride of methylamine. ' On the Detection of Antimony for Medico-Legal Purposes. By Wi..1aM Opune, M.B., F.C.S., L.R.C.P., Professor of Practical Chemistry, &c., Guy’s Hospital. By Reinsch’s process, antimonial deposits upon copper can be obtained from solu- tions which, on account of their dilution, are unaffected by sulphydric acid. The ‘OO1th of a grain of dry tartar emetic, under a dilution of half a million times, gives acomplete metallic coating to one square inch of copper surface. By the same pro- cess, other metals than antimony, arsenic, and mercury can be deposited as brilliant metallic coatings upon copper. The characters of the various deposits, and the cir- cumstances under which they form, vary somewhat. Cadmium precipitates copper completely from cupric solutions; but, on the other hand, from cadmic solutions cad- mium is readily precipitable upon copper. The deposit of antimony upon copper is 58 REPORT—1856. ; best identified by boiling the coated foil in a weak and faintly alkaline solution of permanganate of potash, until the whole of the liquid is destroyed, filtering, acidi- fying the filtrate, and treating it with sulphydric acid, when the characteristic orange- coloured antimonial sulphide is produced. ‘ On the Compounds of Chromium and Bismuth. By W. R. Pearson. On Engraving Collodion Photographs by means of Fluoric Acid Gas. By Cuaruus Poorey, Cirencester. In this paper the author set forth the means he had adopted in order to obtain engraved impressions of collodion photographs on glass, He divided the process into four steps :— Ist. The preparation of the plate. 2nd. The treatment of the picture. 3rd. ‘The application of heat to the picture. 4th, The exposure of the picture to the influence of fluoric acid gas. In the preparation of the plate, Mr. Pooley found it necessary to use new glass, and strong collodion well iodized, and also to deposit as much pure silver as possible, for which purpose he developed with protosulphate of iron and acetic acid, although he thought other agents would answer the purpose equally well. The author then proceeded to show that the great obstacle he had to contend with, was the presence of the film of collodion covering the glass; but this was overcome by submitting the plate to a high temperature, which gave to the silver a white, frosted appearance, and attenuated the film of collodion so much as to make it permeable to the action of the gas. The picture was then exposed to the influence of the dry, warm vapour of fluoric acid, and in 20 to 40 seconds the operation was completed. Having washed off the film, a fine etching becomes visible, so delicate in its mark- ings, and yet so perfect, that the unassisted eye is unable to discern all its beauties. It requires a lens to make out all the minutiz of detail correctly. The author then adverted to a remarkable fact which he had observed in the character of the engraved picture, namely, that the portions of the glass on which the silver had been deposited were those on which the action of the gas first took place, the unsilvered parts being unaffected by it. This circumstance, which appears to be at variance with our notions of the ancient claims of fluoric acid for silica, opens a new field for investigation. The author refrained from offering an explanation of this interesting question, but left it as a subjeet for future consideration. On the Gases of the Grotto del Cave. By the Rev. C. Prircuarp, M.A., F.R.S. On the Corrosive Action of Smoke on Building Stones. By Professor A. Vortcxnr, Ph.D., F.C.S. On the Composition of American Phosphate of Lime. By Professor A. Voricxer, Ph.D., F.CS. On Basic Phosphates of Lime. By Professor A. Vorncxer, Ph.D., F.C.S. On Albuminized Collodion. By W. Sykes Warp, F.C.S. Immediately after the publication of M. Taupenot’s process, I proceeded to experi- ment on it, under the impression that it possessed many advantages over the dry photographic processes then known, and that the further investigation of it was likely to lead to results of the highest interest, both practically and theoretically. In these respects I have not been disappointed, and I can most decidedly recommend the adoption of the process to all photographers, as well to those who are not afraid of a little trouble in the manipulation of preparing their own materials and plates, as to those who, preferring the artistic choice of subjects, would rather commit the prepara- tion andsubsequent development of plates to assistants, or to professional photographers. 2 LF ”t—“‘“_‘COCOCO~™ ee TRANSACTIONS OF THE SECTIONS. 59 : Ihave to acknowledge the assistance of several friends, Members of the Leeds Photographic Society, of whom some worked conjointly with me, and of others who freely communicated to me their experience in working the albumen process. The modification of the original process which I have adopted, consists, first, in using only one bath for both the first and second sensitizing of the plate. ‘This bath is composed of about 35 grains of nitrate of silver per ounce, with about 10 per cent. of the commercial acetic acid known as Beaufoy’s acid. Secondly, in using a very fluid collodion somewhat highly iodized and not containing any bromide, and in using albumen without any other addition than a bromide and sufficient water for its solu- tion. I use about 4 grains of bromide of potassium for the white of each egg, but the particular bromide, or the precise quantity, does not appear to be very material. And, thirdly, in drying the coating of albumen by suspending the plate in a wire cradle attached to a long thread over a heated iron plate, and keeping the prepared glass plate in rapid rotation until dry, so as in the first instance to throw off the superfiuous albumen by the centrifugal force, and then to cause the plate to dry equally from the centre. I use a similar method of drying after the second sensitizing, but without heat if the plates are to be kept more than a day or two. By adopting these manipulations, I have been able to prepare plates up to 17 inches by 13 as free from blemishes and with very little more trouble, than if collodion alone had been used. ’ T have always preferred to develope the picture by gallic acid, using a cold, nearly saturated solution, with the addition of about 4 minims per ounce of a solution of nitrate of silver, 30 grains per ounce with about 30 minims of acetic acid, z. e. rather less acidified than the bath solution. This generally developes the picture in about an hour and a half; but if the picture be faint from over-exposure, or slow in developing from under-éxposure, an addition of double or treble the quantity of aceto-nitrate solution should from time to time be added. A greater quantity of silver in the first instance appears to retard tle development. Small plates may be more speedily developed by pyrogallic acid, but with large plates I find gallic acid preferable, both on the score of economy, and that with pyro- gallic acid constant care is required in watching the development and in preventing the spoiling the result by a muddy deposit. The theoretical advantages of this process appear to me to be, that, compared with other processes, it permits quite as great, and I think a much greater latitude in the time of exposure; that whilst the rapidity is as great as can be desired (except for the instantaneous effects, which are only practicable with wet collodion), an exposure for many hours or even days may be given for feebly illumined objects; that the use of an iodide in the collodion and a bromide in albumen, give a great increase of sen- sibility, in like manner as the accelerating effect by the alternate use of iodine and bromine in the Daguerreotype; that the image is formed on the plane on which the combined films of collodion and albumen coalesce together, and where alone there is a combination of iodide and bromide of silver; thus, although it is necessary that the plates should be very carefully cleaned to procure the perfect adherence of the film of collodion, neither impurities on the surface of the glass plate, nor on the upper sur- face of the albumen, are increased during the development of the image; that the drying the plates by heat prevents almost entirely the blistering of the plates, which has been found so great « disadvantage in the process as published by M. Taupenot. Note.—Subsequent experiments have shown the use of a bromide alone in the albumen to be fallacious. On a New Process for Making and Melting Steel. By P. J. Worsiey. This process, invented by Dr. Gurlt, is interesting as an example of the method of applying fuel, known as the gas-fuel method, by which the useful portions of the fuel are brought to bear while all impurities are left behind. This latter advantage is peculiarly applicable to iron and steel making, as the chief impurities in these metals are derived from the fuel. Dr. Gurlt exposes iron-ore to a current of gas, of which a small proportion is burnt to give the necessary heat. A short exposure merely reduces, a longer carbonizes, so that either malleable iron, steel, or cast iron can be obtained 60 - REPORT—1856. at will. By applying gas-fuel to a reverberatory furnace, and blowing in air by pipes over the bridge, a true blowpipe flame is obtained, by which the highest heat possible is attained, and also by the regulation of the wind the atmosphere of the furnace may be kept either neutral, oxidizing or reducing at will. With such a furnace Dr. Gurlt hopes to melt steel in large quantity without injury to its quality. The gas is obtained by burning the fuel in a close deep fire-box by means of a blast of air at the bottom. On the Use of the Gramme in Chemistry, By Henry Wricut, GEOLOGY. On Gold in India. By Lieut. Ayton, Bombay Artillery. On Fossils from the Crimea. By Witt1am H, Bary, Geological Survey of Great Britain. Tue fossils which formed the subject of this communication belong, with one ex- ception, to the Invertebrata, and were principally collected in the southern part of the Crimea, by Captain C. F. Cockburn, of the Royal Artillery. They comprise a series from the Monastery of St. George and gorge of Iphigenia, consisting of fossils from the Jurassic and oldest deposits; also others from the tertiaries resting immediately upon them ; and from the volcanic or eruptive rocks which have disturbed and broken up some of these strata, together with a set of well-preserved newer tertiary Mollusea from the Quarantine Harbour. The Museum of Practical Geology has also received from Major Cooke, of the Royal Engineers, a suite of somewhat similar forms of Steppe limestone fossils from the Redan, and near the dockyard of Sevastopol, and some interesting Jurassic Brachiopoda from Balaklava. It possesses also from Lieu- tenant-Colonel Munro, and Lieutenant-Colonel Charles Lygon Cocks, of the Cold- stream Guards, other specimens of the Steppe limestone containing fossils, obtained from the ground before Sevastopol, upon which the allied armies were encamped, and volcanic and mineral specimens from the sea-coast. These instructive collections, including a series of fossils from the various strata of the Crimea, formerly presented by the Imperial School of Mines at St. Petersburgh, enable us to add to the published lists of fossils from that country seventy-four species. P The geology of this peninsula having been described in detail by M. Du Bois de Montpéreux, M. Huot in the work of Demidoff, M. Hommaire de Heli, and by Sir R. I. Murchison and M. de Verneuil in the ‘ Geology of Russia and the Ural Moun- tains,’ a slight sketch of the formations represented in that country only is necessary before proceeding to the remarks upon the fossils. The most ancient deposits of the Crimea are those at the base of the Jurassic for- mation, described as black schists, composed of hard, soft, and ferruginous beds, which are probably equivalent to the Trias, or New Red Sandstone appearing in the Valley of Baidar and other localities, and on the coast, where they are superimposed by the Lias. Overlying the schists of the Lias are the Jurassic rocks, which extend along the southern sea-coast from Balaklava to the vicinity of Theodosia or Kafia, a length of about 100 miles. This mountain-chain of hard and crystalline limestones, pierced and broken into by volcanic eruptions of greenstone, porphyry, &c., is, with its asso- ciated strata, analogous to that of the Caucasus, and proceeds in a direction E.N.E. to S.S.W., its highest point being the Tchatir Dagh or Tent Mountain, of an elevation of 5135 feet. The Bay of Balaklava is enclosed on both sides by steep and rugged rocks of the Jurassic formation, composed of compact red and grey limestones, in which are clefts filled with a reddish clay. These limestones and clays contain nume- rous organic remains, the most abundant of which are corals and Encrinital joints. At the foot of the chain towards the north, the lower division of the Cretaceous series, or “‘ Neocomien,” may be well observed, its horizontal beds resting unconform- TRANSACTIONS OF THE SECTIONS. 61 ably either upon the Jurassic limestones, or upon the shales at their base, the inter- mediate subdivisions being absent. Upon these beds repose the Upper Cretaceous, composed of shales (probably equivalent to the Gault), Upper greensand, Chalk marl, and White chalk. On the eastern coast the Hippuritic and Senonian subdivisions test immediately on the disturbed Jurassic beds, the intermediate subdivisions being absent. The Cretaceous series does not occupy much space in the Crimea, being enclosed between the nummulitic deposits and the Jurassic limestone, taking the same direction, and extending from Kaffa to Cape Chersonese on the south-west coast. The soft calcareous rock of Inkermann, from which the beautiful white stone used in con- structing most of the public buildings of Sevastopol was obtained, is very easily worked, but becomes harder and more durable by exposure to the atmosphere. From comparison of its fossils, it appears to be identical with the Upper chalk. The Lower Tertiary or Eocene is represented by the Nummulitic formation, which, like the cretaceous series, is elevated by the mountainous region of the coast, and dis- posed in long bands following its contour. This formation commences in the environs of Theodosia, continuing to the north, near to Karas-ubazar, Simferopol, and Baktchi Serai, terminating at the south-west coast near Sevastopol. The Upper Tertiary formation includes the older and newer Caspian or Steppe limestone, the former of which subdivisions, or older Caspian, occupies the northern and greater portion of the peninsula at Eupatoria, Sevastopol, &c., including the chief limestones round Kertch, and the deposits of the cliffs of Kamiesch Boroun and Taman. These limestones and sands, associated in some localities with volcanic ashes, tufa, &c., occur in various conditions as shelly and oolitic limestones of marine and freshwater origin, being more or less fossiliferous. The Heracleotic Chersonesus is, as it were, a shred of the Steppe limestone; the Bay of Sevastopol exhibiting a succession of formations from the most recent of these tertiaries through the nummu- litic limestone and chalk. The newer Caspian occupies the still more northern extre- mity of the Crimea, extending to Perekop, Kherson, and the shores of the Sea of Azof. The environs of Kertch and Taman are the most favourable localities to observe its characters, and here the fossils are in good preservation. The existence of coal has been often rumoured, but on examination the supposed coal has proved to be lignite of very ordinary quality. Deposits of hydrate and phosphate of iron have been met with near to Kertch, Taman, and other parts of the Crimea. A foundry was formerly established near Kertch, and the iron was worked by M. Gourieff. From an analysis by Hussein Effendi, of the Government School of Mines, it gave but 19:234 per cent. After describing the new species, the following summary of fossils collected from each formation was read, viz. :— Lower Seconpary—Jurassic Group. Known New species. species. Total, Ja \ ELUTED ADE MS ANE SIR SPORE IS WE AEROS ew itr yey Sarr ety RO 1 ZED TE, NEE TERI SER RNID eer cones Piers ames-ek EMMA) ) 10 1: 21 ay oye aT SR RNP ee NG 9 RR SA an CS: ? 9 MioWuscan. brachiopoda.. tga, be \ Seal ais ebisen the fetes len barnes wih 4 11 SCONGDITGE Ay cater eMail ss Delle Se by pli oe weld sh eps ah O 2 8 Gastenopoda). 6 ),-< mei CIE ola toh sjecau) oc tule cs aibmieen py ok 1 2 Cephalopoda, .8