* Scag » 3 oe ita eae paps vise uy MY; a te x fis? ry he o roy) Lane ; ees ; deli: gn ty A Papin REPORT OF THE BORWTY-HIGHTH MEETING. OF THE LES FOR THE|~ “¢ ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE; HELD AT DUBLIN IN AUGUST 1878. LONDON: JOHN MURRAY, ALBEMARLE STREET. 1879. [Ofice of the Association: 22 Atpemarte Srreet, Lonvon, W.] LONDON : PRINTED BY SPOTTISWOODE AND CO., NEW-STREET SQUARD AND PARLIAMENT STREET CONTENTS. ara Page OssEcts and Rules of the Association .........ssscccssseesceressceaseeseeseeees yg? 6.4 Places of Meeting and Officers from commencement..........ssecsseeeeeeeseeuees XXvili Presidents and Secretaries of the Sections of the Association from com- PHOHGCMIENG seicececscececsevenpesesseeesescecacanasaresieses edocs regeaonendsnt ee onsatdes XXXV MMC ENDGH 00.5. 25d shins acane cvsdsaausdocdwestaoTsos cicpavenavscataasuaene ai gueuse xvii Peeires to the Operative Classes. .2.....sscecasesooscgeseessheceasiocenseveseiunes xlix Table showing the Attendance and Receipts at Annual Meetings............ 1 PREMIER A COOUNUL 25 csaiced een baled y sce 5 dacs Has cde tuinnidesa'vasleddsoegqansdsoacoweseses lii Officers of Sectional Committees present at the Dublin Meeting............... liii SRHCOMBMANGCWOOUNCH DUST O10 sc... dectostsancedetecdhe steeds cathode ddaaddebelade slat lv Report of the Council to the General Camnntttad si) Wee NG) Sats lvi Recommendations of the General Committee for Additional Reports and PROSCUTCHESEIM gS CLON COs. 5 eee ssn a Ueseeeias shies ec snWeeovsosnceeavoossedeicondeeresdess lyiii NIE WOT Y MAT AN (He. on. ngccnede cave Sule sShacssacad¥ccnnaneshacseasascqdecn as Ixiv Pldces of Meeting in 1879 and’ 1880............cc-ccseceoccseseaacscoecsecescdoveies lxv General Statement of Sums paid on account of Grants for Scientific )SER]PORIES) cobos pedestiederncobcrneot sagan ons dudereicbonert dacesbon ddencheanetbose-auerEcnsane Ixvi Arrangement of the General Meetings............sscsccsccscsscsecsccesescenseeeseees lxxy Address by the President, Wii1t1am Sporriswoopk, Esq., M.A., D.O.L., MERWE tus. ety Ay ERE hase screcsceresaececes ccncoamodcte es coaedusecssncee 1 REPORTS ON THE STATE OF SCIENCE. Catalogue of the Oscillation-frequencies of Solar Rays; drawn up under the superintendence of a Committee of the British Association, consisting of Dr. Hueerns (Chairman), Dr. Dr La Ruz, Mr. J. Norman Lockyer, Dr. J. Exmrson Reynotps, Mr. Sporriswoopr, Dr. W. MarsHatL Warts, and Mr. G. JOHNSTONE STONEY (Reporter)......c..csssssscccccssssescesentesceeees 3 A 2 iv CONTENTS. Page Report of the Committee, consisting of Professor Cayney, Dr. Farr, Mr. J. W. L. Geatsner, Dr. Por, Professor Futter, Professor A. B. W. Kuy- NEDY, Professor Cirrrorp, and Mr. C. W. Merrrirrep, appointed to consider the advisability and to estimate the expense of constructing Mr. BasBace’s Analytical Machine, and of printing Tables by its means. Drawn up by Mr. MERRIFIELD ..........cesseeeescoesereeceeceeeesensceneceeesccesensesensceeees 92 Third Report of the Committee, consisting of Dr. Jourr, Professor Sir W. Tomson, Professor Tarr, Professor BaLtrouR Srpwarz, and Professor MAXWELL, appointed for the purpose of determining the Mechanical Equiva- NOT MOMELCH UR ance cence fences snersnarense dss news cbs cecslesssie’ soe cee eae teem eeemaEe 102 Report of the Committee, consisting of Professor G. Fores, Professor Sir Wit1Am THomson, and Professor Evererr, appointed for the purpose of making arrangements for the taking of certain Observations in India, and Observations on Atmospheric Electricity at Madeirva..............:s.:sceeeeeseeee 108 Report of the Committee, consisting of Professor Sir Wiri1aAm THomson, Professor CLERK MAxweEtt, Professor Tarr, Dr, C. W. Sremuns, Mr. F. J. Bramwe tz, Mr. W. Frovpn, and Mr. J. T. Borromrzy, for commencing Secular Experiments upon the Elasticity of Wires. Drawn up by J. T. BODO MMV cay caseee sere spate sce ssenacsce Danson «va sonveciesdasatery seas scGnee eee emateaeen 103 Report of the Committee on the Chemistry of some of the lesser-known Alka- loids, especially Veratria and Bebeerine ; the Committee consisting of W. CHANDLER Roperts, F.R.S. (Sec.), Dr. C. R. AtpeR Wrieut, and Mr. IN, [eb LUIS Gooneocaoosos Doauodododin uo adn obeeriocopes voceadacneds gus squsoracnéecqaonsaL: 105 Report on the best Means for the Development of Light from Coal-Gas of different qualities, by a Committee consisting of Dr. WiittaAm WALLACE (Secretary), Professor Dirrmar, and Mr. THomas Wits, F.C.8., F.1.0. ... 108 Fourteenth Report of the Committee for Exploring Kent’s Cayern, Devon- shire—the Committee consisting of Joun Evans, F.R.S., Sir Jon Luszock, Bart., F.R.S., Epwarp Vivian, M.A., Grorer Busk, F.R.S., Witt1am Boyp Dawxtns, F.R.S., Witttam AysHrorD SanrorD, F.G.S., Joun Epwarp Ler, F.G.S., and Witr1am PrneEnty, F.R.S. (Reporter)... 124 Report of Committee, consisting of Professor Harkness and Mr. WimLIAM Joxtiy (H. M. Inspector of Schools), reappointed for the purpose of investi- gating the Fossils in the North-west Highlands of Scotland. By My. IGUUN SCCICIALY cinssnsv'seiecweuesonssacsessceeeesticens ae Qe stmeseve seca sbsbabeshionssseded@yateadee Report of the Committee, consisting of Professor Caytry, F.R.S., Professor G. G. Sroxxs, F.R.S., Professor H. J. 8. Surra, F.R.S., Professor Sir Wiri1am Tomson, F.R.S., Mr. James GuatsHer, F.R.S., and Mr. J. W. L. Guatsume, F.R.S. (Secretary), on Mathematical Tables ..................06+ Eleventh Report of the Committee, consisting of Professor EvERErr, Professor Sir Wirr1am Tomson, Professor J. CrprK MAxwe tt, Mr. G. J. Symons, Professor Ramsay, Professor Gurxtn, Mr. J. GuatsHpr, Mr. PEneELLy, Professor Epwarp Hutt, Professor Anstep, Dr. Ctempnt Le Neve Foster, Professor A. 8, Herscuren, Mr. G. A. Lepour, Mr. A. B. Wynnn, Mr. Gattoway, and Mr. Josrpn Dickrnson, appointed for the purpose of inves- tigating the Rate of Increase of Underground Temperature downwards in various Localities of Dry Land and under Water. Drawn up by Professor SIMEON HSCCTOLMINY)) § coos, sin0teccvcsdaensjecdnestesmcas oregevaceesenaweawnesaencisesaqesenss Report of the Committee, consisting of the Rev. Dr. Havenron, Professor Lerra Apams, Professor Barrett, Mr. HarpMAn, and Dr. MAcALISTER, appointed for the purpose of Exploring the Fermanagh Caves. Drawn up by Mr. Tuomas Prunxert, Enniskillen, for Dr. Macatisrer, Secretary of RLU Beas cb opt iva dws sais os'ddpn dese tuseaaansdenaatentsus¥ssdabweys iiiysd skeen’ Sixth Report of the Committee, consisting of Professor PrustwicH, Professor Harkness, Professor Hugues, Professor W. Boyp Dawxrns, Rey. H. W. Crosskry, Professor L. C. Mratn, Messrs. G. H. Morton, D. MackrnrosH, R. H. Trppeman, J. E. Len, James Puant, and W. PEnGcELLy, Dr. DEANE, Mr. ©. J. Woopwarp, and Mr. Motynevx, appointed for the purpose of recording the position, height above the sea, lithological characters, size, and origin of the Erratic Blocks of England, Wales, and Ireland, reporting other matters of interest connected with the same, and taking measures for their preservation. Drawn up by the Rev. H. W. Crossxxy, Secretary...........+. Report on the Present State of our Knowledge of the Crustacea.—Part. IV. mPeyelopment.’ By O. Spunce Bare,) F.LBAS.........cccecccscocccassecseevenenes Report of a Committee, consisting of Professor RotiEsron, Major-General Laner Fox, Professor Busk, Professor Bory Dawxins, Dr. Joun Evans, and Mr. F. G. Hinton Price, appointed for the purpose of examining Two Caves containing human remains, in the neighbourhood of Tenby ............ Report of the Committee, consisting of Professor Sir Wrru1aM THomson, Mr. W. Frovpr, Professor OsBorNE REyNoLps, Captain Dovetas Garon, and Mr. JAmus N. SHoorsrep (Secretary), appointed for the purpose of 157 183 209 vi CONTENTS. Page obtaining information respecting the Phenomena of the Stationary Tides in the English Channel and in the North Sea; and of representing to the Government of Portugal and the Goyernor of Madeira that, in the opinion of the British Association, Tidal Observations at Madeira or other islands in the North Atlantic Ocean would be very valuable, with the view to the advancement of our Inowledge of the tides in the Atlantic Ocean ............ 217 Second Report of the Committee, consisting of Professor Sir WiIDLIAM THomson, Major-General Srracuny, Captain Doveras Garon, Mr. G. F. Deacon, Mr. Rogers Fretp, Mr. E. Rozserts, and Mr. J. N. SHOoLBRED (Secretary), appointed for the purpose of considering the Datum-leyel of the Ordnance Survey of Great Britain, with a view to its establishment on a surer foundation than hitherto, and for the tabulation and comparison of Oth exM Dat UM=aMIATKS ace dc re. cs tas: eye seclese core aesesleecines clenpien ose Setne ee mtmeeemmcemecd le Report of the Committee on Instruments for Measuring the Speed of Ships, consisting of Mr. W. Frovupn, Mr. F. J. BRamwett, Mr. A. EH. FLEercuer, Rev. E. L. Brrrnon, Mr. James R. Naprer, Mr. C. W. Mprrirrerp, Dr. C. W. Sizmzns, Mr. H. M. Brunet, Mr. J. N. SHoorsrep (Secretary), Professor JAmEs THomson, and Professor Sir WILLIAM THOMSON ............. 219 Report of a Committee appointed for the purpose of further developing the investigations into a Common Measure of Value in Direct Taxation, the Committee consisting of the Right Hon. J. G. Husparp, M.P., Mr. Cmap- wick, M.P., Mr. Morty, M.P., Dr. Farr, Sir Grorar Camppett, M.P., Mr. Hatxterr, Professor Jrvons, Mr. Newmarcn, -Mr. Swann, Mr. MacnnrL Carrp, Mr, SterHen Bourne, Professor Lronzr Levi, Mr. Heywoop, and Mir SEVATUETT (SECTCTATY): 5... .2.s.cs0cscameervensetecscsnessecssn dete tdesceseeenneedtae 220 Xeport on Sunspots and Rainfall. By Cuartes Metprum, F.R.S............... 280 teport on Observations of Luminous Meteors during the Year 1877-78, by a Committee consisting of JAmus GuatsuEr, F.R.S., &e., R. P. Grua, F.G.S., F.R.A.S., C. Brooxn, F.R.S., Professor G. Forbes, F.R.S.E., WaALrer Fiieut, D.S8c., F.G.S., and Professor A. S. Herscurt, M.A., F.R.A.S. (Reporter) ir .ih css sexcsteccaveceicigeaeavss's onpvest dua sons seach cicaet de ap tcaeatee teen EES. Sixth Report of the Committee, consisting of Sir Jonny Luppock, Bart., Pro- fessor PrestwicH, Professor Busk, Professor T. McK. Hueuns, Professor W. B. Dawxtns, Professor Mratt, Rey. H. W. Crosskny, Mr. H.C. Sorsy, and Mr. R. H. Tipprman, appointed for the purpose of assisting in the Exploration of the Settle Caves (Victoria Cave). Drawn up by Mr. R. H. TIDDEMAN (Reporter))cccscsaces-cocauesescscs ese ect ececescasssesedecesicenoteed easement 377 Report of a Committee, consisting of Mr. Gopwiy-Avstren, Professor Prust- wicH, Mr. Davipson, Mr. Erurriper, Mr. Wrtrerr, and Mr. Torrey, appointed for the purpose of assisting the Kentish Boring Exploration. Drawn up by Ma; Gonwin-AUstEn: ....chece..cs+-:dssvec- aces sseeneateseseeeneeeanee 380 Fourth Report of the Committee for Investigating the Circulation of the Underground Waters in the Jurassic, New Red Sandstone, and Permian Formations of England, and the Quantity and Character of the Waters supplied to various Towns and Districts from these Formations; with Appendix, by Mr. Rogurrs, on the Filtration of Water through Triassic Sandstone; the Committee consisting of Professor Hutt, Rey. H. W. - CrosskEy, Captain D. Garon, Mr. Gratsuer, Mr. H. H. Howertt, Mr. G. A. Lrsour, Mr. W. Motynevx, Mr. Morron, Mr. Prnertty, Professor Prestwich, Mr. James Prant, Mr. Mettarp Reape, Mr. W. Warraxker, and Mr, Du RANG (REPOrberyity.c..h.c5 os cle eas cee gees ceesei'es ses vacencee eeReeene 382 Report of the Committee, consisting of James R. Naprer, F.R.S., Sir W. THomson, F.R.S., W. Frovpz, F.RS., J. T. Borromriry, and Osporne Reywotps, F.R.S. (Secretary), appointed to investigate the eflect of Pro- pellers on the Steering of Vessels...............0265 cdbnisle wale eine acne Rete teen 419 TRANSACTIONS OF THE SECTIONS. Section AA—-MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCE. THURSDAY, AUGUST 15, 1878. Page 1. Report of the Committee on Underground Temperature .............sss0000 33 2. Report of the Committee on the Mechanical Equivalent of Heat............ 453 3. An Account of some Experiments on Specific Inductive Capacity. By J. E. H. Gorpon, Assistant Secretary of the British Association ............ 455 On the Effect of Variation of Pressure on the Length of Disruptive Dis- charge in Air. By J. E. H. Gorpon, Assistant Secretary of the British JONSIEO EIS INO Scodeuaeangoadeebonondce cone peec aaeccinbBono Boon Seadtoncondaccoedacéedescer 455 . On the Absorption Spectrum of Chlorochromic Anhydride. By G. _ Jounstone Sroney, M.A., F.R.S., Secretary to the Queen’s University in Ireland, and J. Eerson Reynoxps, M.D.,}'.C.S., Professor.of Chemistry gine: University of Diablin. -2.01:-cmssatesgeveactecranissestbovceudedsecteleeveevees 454 6. On the Flow of Water in uniform régime in Rivers and in Open Channels generally. By Professor Jamzs THomson, LL.D., D.Sc., FARS. ......... 454 7. Note on the Pedetic Action of Soap. By Professor W. SranLEy JEvons, TRCIRLISS | ooeiedeostosncae danenpocbcoc bop -b:Loc edBdicaercadsedudbaccedocdugaucd de: Secor borane 435 8. Motions produced by Dilute Acids on some Amalgam Surfaces. By Roprrr (SATIS 10! a gdgeoce dose ego 20+ Ore Uucuer Lacon oat Jt Sericrecopomeces or Bac aEico case se acc aeccEcn 435 9. Note on Surface Tension. By Grorcr FRANcIS FITZGERALD ............++- 436 10. New Application of Gas for Lighthouses, illustrated by Models, full-sized Apparatus, &c. By J. R. WIGHAM, M.R.LA, \..........cccsssccessseseeeeeeees 436 11. A Short Description of two kinds of Fog Signals. By J. R. WicHam, BVP LAU res nutewenccriecteosenstecndcsloccciesseahs's ote sieniee sts eetamatompitacisene santsen see's 9 5c 4357 12, A New Atmospheric Gas Machine. By J. R. Wiewam, M.R.LA.......... 457. FRIDAY, AUGUST 16, 1878. 1, Report of Committee on the Oscillation-Frequencies of the Rays of the to Solar Spectrum. By G. JOHNSTONE STONEY .........ccccceeeseeeceeeeeeeeceeees 458 General Results of some Recent Experiments upon the Co-efficient of Friction between Surfaces Moving at High Velocities. By DoveLas CA MONPE Cress yal): Callies JH OE Sp tQOGN cn etie cs «a teietia dcsia’scniga ae oledeebseeles qadsasiewls 438 On a Spectroscope of unusually large Aperture. By G. J. STONEY.......... 44] . On the Support of Spheroidal Drops and allied Phenomena. By G. Jony- stonr Sronry, M.A., F.R.S., Grorer F, Frrzerrarp, M.A., F.T.C.D., and Ricwarp J. Moss, Keeper of the Minerals in the Museum of Science a0) velistis IDWS) 6) 5645 Aon t Shope ppcbonc et ap NnOnp het pric aadosnBee ped n écocs6 coeaeracee 441 vill ‘CONTENTS. Page 5. On the Cause of Travelling Motion of Spheroidal Drops. By G. Jonn- STONE STONMY MOA. AHS: 5 occecececscsctesspsrac nesses onoaie onmeospeseteeetaee 442 6. The Stanhope ‘‘Demonstrator,” or Logical Machine. By Ropert Hariey 442 7. Sur une nouvelle Méthode de Photographie Solaire et les Découvertes qwelle donne touchant la véritable nature de la Photosphére. Par Dr. a) NGAUS ESI Sores aenancdeaaiencieriatets os capers te o4 soe docsic pas eee e aaa eeee ee see 445 8. Sur la Constitution des Spectres Photographiques quand l’action lumi- neuse est extrémement courte. Par Dr. J. JANSSEN ..........cscseseeeseees 445 9. Quelques remarques sur l’éclipse totale et la Couronne. Par Dr. J. IANESWN) scondies tv cspssonGecas'sscingsacounw avery apie cdnvnety task «> shee ore 445 10. On a New Form of Receiving Instrument for Microphone. By W. J. Mrrzar, C.E., Sec. Inst. Engineers and Shipbuilders in Scotland ......... 446 MONDAY, AUGUST 19, 1878. GENERAL SECTION. _1. Report of the Committee on Atmospheric Electricity ............s.seceeseees 448 2. On Edmunds’ Electrical Phonoscope. By W. LAnD .............seceeceeee ene 448 3. On Byrne’s Compound Plate Pneumatic Battery. By W. Lapp............ 448 4. A Diagonal Eyepiece for certain Optical Experiments. By Professor G. TQ IS75I|coagnadsenee “aaneosanodoBaIGeD Goa bbnoso. i Aaabaoosneansaceayoc EEA cbadoostavasaa. 449 5. A Clock with Detached Train. By Professor G. FORBES ...............2c0008 449 6. An Instrument for Indicating and Measuring the Fire-damp in Mines. By ErOTessOr G.. WOBRBEA | j....0n.suussanaSueenaqesnaiin sis pcesileb=aen eda eney ye Sep eee REESE 449 7. On certain Phenomena Accompanying Rainbows. By Professor Srrvyanus PSD HOMPSON, HD) SCr 61S. AL 4b. .ocseccss sles 6 edtiels cde¥s cobiesiktres saneee eee EEE 450 8. New Magnetic Figures. By Sitvanus P. Tompson, B.A., D.Sc., Pro- fessor of Experimental Physicsin University College, Bristol............... 450 9, On Dimensional. Equations, and on some Verbal Expressions in Numerical Science. By Professor Jamus Tomson, LL.D., D.Sc., PRLS. ............ 451 10. On Lead and Platinised Lead as a Substitute for Carbon and Platinised Silver, in Leclanché, Bichromate, and Smee’s Batteries. By Epwarp T. EVARDACAIN JB) Wi5.5 ole. yascemoeeh soacsies neds vec(eaehss saab eSmcacass os octet ees seme 453 11. On a New Form of Electro-Registering Apparatus. By Denny Lan .., 454 12. On an Isochronic Pendulum. By DENNY LANE ..............sccseseeeessseeeces 455 13. The Temperature of the Earth Within. By Wrttram Morris............... 56 14. On Sunspots and Rainfall. By C. MELDRUM ...................scescosecescoeee 457 15, On Lightning Conductors. By R. ANDERSON .............ssseseeceeceseesees 457 DrparRTMENt OF MATHEMArTIcs. 1. Report of the Committee on Babbage’s Analytical Engine .................- 457 2. Report of the Committee on Mathematical Tables, with an Explanation of or the Mode of Formation of the Factor Table for the Fourth Million ...... 457 . Ona New Form of Tangential Equation. By Joun Casnry, LL.D., F.R.S., M.R.IA., Professor of Mathematics in the Catholic University of Ireland 457 . On the Eighteen Co-ordinates of a Conic in Space. By WitirAm Sporrts- WOODE, FIRS Wie. 0cc., Presid Cnt, cerere-cccc-.-meerera-n- see sc eee eRe eee 462 . On the Modular Curves. By Professor H. J. S. SMrry «............cceeeeeee 463 bk = Or CONTENTS. ix Page . On the Principal Screws of Inertia of a free or constrained Rigid Body. By Professor R. S.. BALL ...cccccssccssucssesecenesdteconsccssancasecdecesceoersreese 463 . On the Applicability of Lagrange’s Equations to certain Problems of Fluid Motion. By Professor J. PURSER ..........ssecsscenscasencsescescescceseecceeseese 463 . On the Occurrence of Equal Roots in Lagrange’s Determinental Equation of Small Oscillations. By Frepmrick PURSER, M.A. ...........eeeeeee neon ee 463 . On Halphen’s New Form of Chasles’s Theorem on Systems of Conics satisfying Four Conditions. By Dr. T. Arncurr Hirst, F.RS. ............ 464 . On the Law of Force to any Point when the Orbit is a Conic. By J. W. PG TPATES FLIER. MAME EVs Se cleats salain« seis/one siasehelscniaaanicsle vacise seo esiessisiapiniaseinssies 464 . Note on the Geometrical Treatment of Bicircular Quartics. By FREDE- OHM ED ERATE VE Ass oataniaenes cm asec sects ence aR RR i Oat Se a maa RE 470 . Notes on Circulating Decimals. By J. W. L. Guaisuer, M.A., F.R.S.... 471 . Elementary Demonstration of the Theorem of Multiplication of Deter- minants. By M. Fax, Docens of Mathematics in the University of MO Re oe see ety cticlet ce tied sccteae stews aciecealiecisans eWeauassccs¥eccersanassseuvoseesese 47 7 TUESDAY, AUGUST 20, 1878. DEPARTMENT OF ASTRONOMY. . Report of the Committee on Luminous Meteors. By JAmEs GuAIsHER... 477 . Report of the Committee on the Tides in the English Channel............... 477 . On an Equatorial Mounting for a Three-Foot Reflector. By the Earn or ee Meds etesintemesemmtmacten 486 3, A New Determination of the Number of Electrostatic Units in the Electro- Magnetic Unit. By W. E. Ayrron and J. Perry. Telegram and Letter to Sir W. THomson from Professor W. EH. AYRTON ........seeeeeeeeeceneen ene 487 4, On Apparatus employed in Researches on Crookes’s Force. By RicHarp Jer MIGSS BIOS Io ce bet ccince caste vonclocS oslo seine ons Oh sietsielebate sels es/e deren 489 5. On Spheroidal Drops. By Ricwarp J. Moss, F.C\S. ........eeeeeeeeee esse seen 489 6, On the Spherical Class-Cubic with Three Single Foci. By Henry M. JERFERY, MiAv ......0....csccccsscecccncoscscescsessseaccnreccecersterersnrascesececss 490, 7. On a Cubic Surface referred to a Pentad of Co-tangential Points. By IEimymy#MGn IRR RER Yoo WGAS . chvansesacererercncese sates etslat teiscts anus menteee essen 491 8, A New Form of Trap-Door Electrometer. By Professor BARRETT ......... 495 9. On Unilateral Conductivity in Tourmaline Crystals. By Professor Siut- vanus P. THompson and Dr. OLIVER J. LODGE «......eeseeeseeeeeeeeeneeteneens 495 10. On Gaussin’s Warning regarding the Sluggishness of Ships’ Magnetism. By Sir WicLTaM THOMSON, F.RAS. .......ccecessecencesccecescnsesenscescaveenes 496 11. On the Electrical Properties of Bees’ Wax and Lead Chloride. By Pro- fessors J. PERRY and W. H. AYRTON ........cccescscsscoscescssensseetesacencenes 497 12. Theory of Voltaic Action. By J. BROWN ......ssccssscssseceseceeeecescenesvens 498 13. Mutual Action of Vortex Atoms and Ultramundane Corpuscles. By rofessor Gry HORDES stance sodudecesessaecac ease ec ocsece prienae cteetie sean ee aimee 498 Section B.—CHEMICAL SCIENCE. THURSDAY, AUGUST 15, 1878. Address by Professor Maxwertt Simpson, M.D., F.R.S., F.C.S., President 4a Ue SOCH ON ace. 2cn tr ceecuecGonascencae eaanrincbiecc asaie sic clneeset senate ie seems . Report of Committee on some of the lesser-known Alkaloids .............++ Sk ol i . Report on the best means of Developing Light from Coal Gas, Part I. ... 504 . On the Amounts of Sugar contained in the Nectar of various Flowers. By Arex. SS, Winson, MUA, Bi Sc.eaalicacebtccsstcctincinsse-tt fercetnes ts eeaemeene amen 504 . On the Action of Chlorine upon the Nitroprussides. By Dr. Epwunp W. Davy, Professor of Forensic Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons, Ireland 505 . The Adulteration Act in so far as it relates to the Prosecution of Milk- sellers. By Ernust H. Coon, B.Sc., F.R.C.S., Lecturer upon Experi- mental Physics at the Bristol Trade and Mining School ...........:..0s-0008 506 . On some Fluor Compounds of Vanadium. By Professor H. EK. Rosco, PhiD,, PRB ee cscs eee cee cae vs cede 507 CONTENTS. xi FRIDAY, AUGUST 16, 1878. Page 1. Notes on Aluminium Alcohols. By Dr. Grapstone and ALFRED TRIBE... 508 2. On the Estimation of Mineral Oil or Paraffin Wax when mixed with other Oils or Fats. By Wittr1am THomson, F.R.S.E. .........ccceecece neers 508 3. On the Action of Heat on the Selenate of Ammonium. By Dr, Ep- munD W. Davy, Professor of Forensic Medicine, Royal College of Pega eels pele Ara sere eatemeehoaanaesh'ascica iss goseetnesens dost ow voteaenetes cute teceone 509 4, A New Method of Alkalimetry. By Louis Sreponp, F.C.S..............00088 509 MONDAY, AUGUST 19, 1878. 1. Notes on Water from the Severn Tunnel Springs. By Witiiam Lanr WAREUNMMRG bs. AG, Bs SCr, EROS: cadccssceccsesanceressecacsiescgsasescaseteseessees 511 2. On the Thetines. By E. A. Lurrs, Professor of Chemistry, University CaP CMESTISUO Ls so semviect oa lajenenomer toccaen sae l dewe cela cecahe est’ etatineall tresses ceeaeG 511 3. On the Spectrum of Chlorochromic Acid. By G. JoHystonE Sronzy and PEOCESOL J, LIMERSON HEYNOLDS) .0Jc000¢sas0scacsnassandnabadeotcasssedttsseeeeass 511 4, Summary of Investigations on the Pyridine Series. By Dr. W. Ramsay 511 5. On some of the Derivatives of Furfurol. By Dr. W. Ramsay ............... 512 6. Nitric Acid; its Reproduction from the lower Oxides of Nitrogen. By FEvISEONAURD | Chee O TL OY: ercetatecis'a tates viseitnceiseaisstielesicaece sated tame daeateseianie deena 512 7. On some Substances obtained from the Root of the Strawberry. By Dr. SPB EDHTPRON MEO) Sit penrectascescsescacustbetes afeatic resstestisessotcbescaretcesens 514 8. On a new Mineral White Pigment. By Dr. T. L: Putrson, F.C.8. ...... 514 TUESDAY, AUGUST 20, 1878. 1. On a Simplification of Graphic Formule. By Ottver J. Lopen, D.Sc. ... 516 2. On the Detection by means of the Microphone of Sounds which accom- pany the Diffusion of Gases through a thin Septum. By W. CHANDLER TRORETHOHIS), TEARS cetiecdb Sone: dascecc be docoueDaase Sppuecabeunco certo ond podeooe cee Baer nOes 517 3. A short Account of Baeyer’s Synthesis of Indigo. By Professor J. EMER- Seemce MCT MN, ot US, scan ena vaidsn aden decwssenssdaxecqacduecanel Aataiinanens 517 4, Dr. Ramsay exhibited Victor Meyer’s Apparatus for taking Vapour Den- sities of Substances with High Boiling Points..............cececeesee eee eeeeeeees 517 5. On the Condensation of the Gases hitherto called Permanent. By Pro- HOSSOL AMES DM WAR HEU, cones sasescsierslceadtaveedtsccuedccectecneceteases «neces 517 6. Ona Method of Elementary Organic Analysis by a Moist Process. By Professor WANKLYN and W. J. COOPER ..........ssccsccsecesccnccevceeeseeseees 517 7. On some Peculiarities of the Vartry Water, and on the Action of that Water upon Boiler Plates. By Caries R. C. Ticusornz, LL.D., Ph.D., RE RM RE neta cau ieecnctackak a eRe Rescate eipnl vas sees “pin B ved Sa ganadn sah va adasonsi 517 8. On a New Process of Photo-Chemical Printing in Metallic Platinum. By MMR BTS NTI at tsa) cash ae ends suse ph encore debntadns aie -Ghenwiisnierieew oodaiedlys 518 Section C.—GEHOLOGY. THURSDAY, AUGUST 15, 1878. Address by Mr. Jonny Evans, D.C.L., F.R.S., F.S.A., F.G.S., President of OMS CULM ves einai reine atganrades cna ptids ve foledelaetxiech

>eancsip ine espe as eaieeee. aan emneee 601 2. On the Theory of Muscular Contraction. By G. F. .Frrzerrap, M.A. ... 601 3. On the Nervous System of Meduse. By G. J. Romanus, F.L.S............. 601 TUESDAY, AUGUST 20, 1878. 1. On the Excretion of Nitrogen. Part 11—By the Skin. By J. Byryz POWER Yee ance tects ove seinen eater sco aMerccsbiaeesee cv euee sss sasae>seapeenat sateen eee 602 2. Ona Direct Method for determining the Calorific Power of Alimentary Substances. By J. A. Wank Lyn and W. J. COOPER .............sceeseeeeee 605 8. On the Aberrant Form of the Sacrum connected with Naegele’s Obliquely Contracted Pelvis. By Atten Tuomson, M.D., LL.D., F.R.S. ............ 605 4, Note on the Occurrence of a Sacral Dimple and its possible Significance. By DAWSON TAT, FOR.O.S. -..000+00s 00s +osennesesasnbasnsasneansieeen a nenenEenee 606 WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 21, 1878. 1. The Rate of Cardiac Hypertrophy. By Wuittram H. Srons, M.A., HHI OP Gitecalanicslgess aasenaench oOebee ctePee cian keaecp ise ines ious shee eae eee 608 Srotion E.—GEOGRAPHY. THURSDAY, AUGUST 135, 1878. Address by Professor Sir C. Wyvitte Tuomson, LL.D., D.Se., F.R.S. F.R.S.E., F.G.S., F.L.S., President of the Section.............sscsscsscssssenss 613 1. A Journey on Foot through Arabia Petreea. By the Rev. F. W. Hot- GAWD MI PAN IRR Crs en ces eceseu ass ase ares eitaasene re npacentdes: esmterh = seen ememe re 622 2. Survey of Galilee. By Lieut. H. H. Kironennmr, R.E., F.R.G.S. ......... 624 FRIDAY, AUGUST 16, 1878. 1. Notes on some Geographical Variations on the Coast of France. By J. 8. DPS LAGS, Sua Uh nc tceatentwe tende= digo coe te Sap pameb eh paket an 628 2. On Processes of Map-producing. By Captain J. Warurnousz, BC.S., Assistant Surveyor-General of India ...........c..sssceeecescseceecceecensseesses 628 3. Richthofen, Prejevalsky, and Lake Lob. By E. Drtmar Morean, RRIGISS Go cepin watamtngeei se exces > 5aabe delsnp digs os ns lesan ba'seinc ok en ae meee 629 CONTENTS. XVii : MONDAY, AUGUST 19, 1878. * Page . The Land of Midian. By Captain R. Burton, H.B.M. Consul, Trieste ... 630 . On a Journey to Fez and Mequinez. By A. Learen, M.D., F.R.G.S., Uh oa Be open np sit 6 cb Gh Lr has Aie te Bir eo ee oe a A a 631 . On the Progress in the Official Report of the “Challenger” Expedition. By Sir C. Wrvitie THomson, LL.D., F.R.S. L. & E. .......cccsecceeseeceees 635 - On the Characteristic Features of Alaska, as developed by the U.S. Survey. Mamet. DVATTs Weer Otis vances 2eecec.2fshas.cbisbeccedseeeterecereacdeetasetiessdces 633 . On the Acquisition by England of Cyprus, and some Observations on the Islands in the Levant. By J.S. PaEné, LL.D., F.S.A. .......cccceeeeeeeee 634 TUESDAY, AUGUST 20, 1878. . On the Best Route to attain a high Northern Latitude, or the Pole itself. 2 TERT Leigh be 0S DA BBD x GS Be GS ee Me Alla 636 - Geographical Significance of North Polar Ice. By E. L. Moss, M.D....... 636 . Livingstonia.—The Opening up. of the Hast African Lake District. By JAMES STEVENSON, F.R.G.S. .......ccccescceseeseees Pisce Seincccanioaiasat saya aaerens 636 mmevps.. by Major Witson, R.B. FRG. ...:.cveceseustasccacaceseconsesneeoes 637 5. On the Geographical Distribution of the Tea Plant. By A. Burret, EMRE MENS erie ear aah 2Ire sev ac acca sade setae feLehc Saal uuic dias acs nochow neds 638 . Influence of the Straits of Dover on the Tides of the British Channel and Morthisea, By Sir Wits THOMSON, FR.S,.......ccccciecrreseaesaeeasscee 639 Section F.—ECONOMIC SCIENCE AND STATISTICS. THURSDAY, AUGUST 15, 1878. Address by Professor J. K. Ineram, LL.D., M.R.I.A., President of the Section 641 1, Report of Anthropometric Committee ...............sssscecesseecseensesseeacevece 658 2. On Canadian Statistics. By A. E. Bareman, F.\S.S. ..........cccccseecesceeess 658 3. How to meet the Requirements of Population displaced by Artizans’ mwellmgs Act, By Sir JAMES WATSON -.......00..ccescccececosserassgencesecesss 658 4, On the Boarding-out of Pauper Children. By Miss Isasenua M. Top...... 659 cr FRIDAY, AUGUST 16, 1878. . On the Condition of Small Farmers, and their Position with reference to the Land Question. By MuRROUGH O'BRIEN.............sccccseeceeessceneeeees 661 . The Creation of a Public Commission to purchase Land for Resale to Occupiers in Ireland. By FRancts NOUAN ..........cccsssesecsccccessceuensceece 662 . Suggestions for a Bill to regulate Sales of Property. By Jamus H. Sie wea He UIA Tar) Etna MSc Noyes tus ORs hedet odtdenace ces sanvcncaecesavousedes 662 - On the Application of Copyhold Enfranchisement to long Leases in Ive- land, the assimilation of Chattel and Freehold Succession, and the simplification of Transfer of Land. By J. H. Epa ............cc0cccceeeeeees 663 . On Impediments to the prompt carrying out of the principles conceded by Parliament on the Irish Land Question. By W. Netrson Hancock, NN Ae ce eeen Bie. oak coe eM ae een Use tots dota ost be anh acbigewargaaeeeeg debanadd 664 1878, a XVlil CONTENTS. MONDAY, AUGUST 19, 1878. -Page 1. Report of Committee on Common Measure of Value in Direct Taxation ... 666 2. The Pericdicity of Commercial Crises, and its Physical Explanation. By EBrosessOr gin STAND YG RBV ONS y7E Abii, seve ofc s-iee0> ot eeneseentaste tetteamen tee esis 666 3. The Definitions of Political Economy. By Professor MAGUIRE ............ 667 4, Some Statistical Researches into the Poor Removal Question, with special ‘reference to the Removal of Persons of Irish Birth from Scotland. By We inrmnsOne EEN COCK, WiDr. << .cses0ce sees seneed evlucneeeneceeeeeet seeds sees 667 -5.:On the Education and Training of;the Insane. By JosrpH Lator, M.D., Resident Medical Superintendent, Richmond District Lunatic Asylum MDD PDT ew cios acest deauls sais ta saben assets cts'eiselessiees 5» noice Oaeenenet tece eet eee 667 TUESDAY, AUGUST 20, 1878. . Some Remarks on the Desirability of Simultaneous and Identical Legisla- tion for England and Ireland. By H. Li. JWPHSON.............ssseeeeeeeeeeeees 678 . On the Importance of raising Ireland to the Level of England and Scotland in the matter of Industrial Schools and Compulsory Education. By W. INBIUSONAELAN COCK GTi. Di ct.scccesecctdecsescccens sossevtestcs cites eaieeaeneneeee 674 3. On some Economic Fallacies of Trades Unionists. By Professor J. J. SHAW als sastdeavics ncseridsuecscccadeuclblion sbeuftecessuededscae eneeMeeee ace atten eR aReeaneS 675 ‘WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 21, 1878. 1. On the Social ‘Aspects of Trades Unionism. By J. H. M. Campsetr ...... 676 2..On Adam Smith’s Theory of Rent. By W. D. HENDERSON ..............000 677 ‘Sgecrion ‘G.—MECHANICAL SCIENCE. THURSDAY, AUGUST 15, 1878. Address by Mr. Epwarp Easton, C.E., President of the Section ............06. 679 1, On River‘Gontrol. By J. CLARKE HAWKSHAW ...cceccsssscssccnssccssneocesoee 687 2, On the Effect of River or Arterial Drainage Works upon River Floods. By James Ditton, Mem. Tnst©.BLL iit.. casecesenascesnen 30s aie STA" 9 "1's wu “AW ‘NVWTTIV ‘¢£’°) WOssaAOUd “bsm ‘sso “i “f ‘Sid “S'au “bs ‘Aqrog wow “A Sec ‘sot “Smad “ay ‘Surpo re "a'W ‘UWosIesIg “1 LOSsojorg ‘a'IT “bsg ‘poomion ugor ‘bsg ‘you somes ‘SU “VW ‘Wea “S “U tossojor . ‘ « “sv'id “Sad “TO “va eed jo Tey 049 “MOH AAI ONL S181 ‘PL ysndny ‘NrIsaqg ee ais weer ae eeece serra: Spel COW WT nie: nt: ‘ATI TO “WW “bsa ‘ACOOMSILLOdS WVITIIM sees urfqna ‘edap[09 ApULIT, Jo ySoaord OU TREC eee eee eee eee eee ee © | uyquq jo 1048 pao’y eq3 “uo 4Usry oud, *LL8T ‘QT qsnsny ‘HLAOWATA Braver eater sane =e Pete eee eer OB HT ST YL ‘a1IT “GW ‘NOSHOHL N@TIV wWOssHzoud tieesesseseeaterssaeesetene ‘Sw, “org “wn “bsg ‘ apnory WITT “eS yowrd SV Ud “Sw “aT ‘ “Vfl “beg ‘epoomstyjodgy UertiLAy eee ee ‘DSW O'S ‘paoyqoR[_ PLOT “uO, ASNT OUT, ( (tittereeserssssessersrssoess sgortur Grau “bsg ‘oqng eouedg 8917240 “bsq “‘pzojoqry MA WOZT LUE “bsg ‘ozenbg WelT[TA “bsg ‘smepYy WITT eeeeeereeeeeseoeesess ssoqmnospiy-qunoyy JO [avy oy} “UOH quant ou, es vee be ase 8." saad = WU ‘sud “bsg “sunoxX somer Cole nate Pap ROT Persad shy OER shia tisha ‘aTT ‘Kesey Te) “VW IOssojorg “bse “Horry “ase |e PT Sa “aT “CW ‘Wosmoyy, uai[y 1ossejorg “9181 ‘9 Joqueydeg MODSV TD o ssein alaejatejaeselpscelst acciera ows aie Veratalafebaiate ntets Cea “WOR, “SU “a11T “CW ‘SMIUGNV SVNWOHL WOssasoud *bsqy ‘OuLBy Bly) somes eee eee eee “1 1) "T “ow “Tod “agit WW ‘aosulog WIT ag "SW OPO “AL “IC tresssesseeserses ray Oy" PL Squg TeAMxXUyA SUAS WRITE TS ee Reece eres esengeeteseeeses MOSSEL JO 4SOA0Ig PAOTT oY} “UOT OUT, eT OOD TSW “ATT “Le ‘WAsry Jo oyxnd 49 soRrp STH ees alee gh ae ng ie ed ee snasaa ise BT Se NT d'T'T ‘requed2e9 "gM “AG ‘SOW “Str S Taxsta ty "TOM ‘uosurpmeyy 'O Aruay ag ye1eue+y-s0leyy Aiki erbiala.s)e' Seine Rive /pluisie MTRiaLe bale Seyeeeeeesveceserers roagte Jo LOAVPY OWL seregeary “CW Seg oqaeg ‘qq00T910N “H PLOPVIS ng "uO SY oy, peneecevcceranenne ‘oro “gry ‘olong Jo [eq oyg ‘UOH 4YWSTY OUT, *QISI ‘oz asn3ny “lorsrag “bsg ‘oyrelO “A UToL . sreeeeeres oer “Sd “HO ‘MVHSHAVH NHOL UIs ‘sold “os'a “V'E “Dspr ‘eyuedrep FUBT * AL tee amrr OTTO ‘SoHOFS TOSSaJOIT ‘SW ‘WosuTqoy “IC “ALT seeceesecerevesecunre 7 (SMOIPUY ‘I “Aud “Ad "ACW Poe eee eee eee eee eee eee eee ee "aw ‘ ‘qaeg ‘ooRTeA PreqoNy ag snetsarccetenescsentsonsness gir (SOR GO TUE Of} OH FAH CULL treseeeeereres soured Gord ‘UOTIEISHIUG, JO [Tes oy4 ‘MOH FUSMT OUT "SalwVLAYSAS 1V9071 *BLNSOISSYd-JSIA / “SLN3QISSYd ‘Ds “trepourts “LT “T'O “OTM “4H TOssejorg “bsg ‘Qavagy sngteny * Ay ; “PLOT “6L ysnany ‘asvaTag sreees guar “GIT 1T'0'd “IIVANAL ‘£ WOSsmAOUd PRESIDENTS AND SECRETARIES OF THE SECTIONS. XXXV Presidents and Secretaries of the Sections of the Association. Date and Place Presidents Secretaries MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES. COMMITTEE OF SCIENCES, I.—MATHEMATICS AND GENERAL PHSICS, 1832. Oxford...... Davies Gilbert, D.C.L., F.R.S. 1833. Cambridge |Sir D. Brewster, F.R.S. ...... 1834. Edinburgh |Rev. W. Whewell, F.R.S. SECTION A.—MATHEMATICS 1835. Dublin...... Rey. Dr. Robinson ......... ies 1836. Bristol...... Rev. William Whewell, F.R.S. 1837. Liverpool...|/Sir D. Brewster, F.R.S. ...... 1838. Newcastle |Sir J. F. W. Herschel, Bart., F.R.S. 1839. Birmingham | Rev. Prof. Whewell, F.R.S.... 1840, Glasgow ...|Prof. Forbes, F.R.S............. 1841. Plymouth |Rev. Prof. Lloyd, F.R.S....... 1842. Manchester|Very Rev. G. Peacock, D.D., F.R.S. 1843. Cork......... Prof. M‘Culloch, M.R.LA. ... 1844. York......... The Earl of Rosse, F.R.S. ... 1845. Cambridge |The Very Rev. the Dean of Ely. 1846. Southamp-|Sir John F. W. Herschel, ton. Bart., F.R.S. 1847. Oxford...... Rey. Prof. Powell, M.A., F.RB.S. 1848. Swansea ...|Lord Wrottesley, F.R.S. ...... 1849. Birmingham | William Hopkins, F.R.S....... 1850. Edinburgh |Prof. J. D. Forbes, F.R.S., Sec. R.S.E. 1851. Ipswich ...|Rev. W. Whewell, D.D., F.R.S., &e. 1852. Belfast...... Prof. W. Thomson, M.A., F.R.S. L. & E. 1853. Hull......... The Very Rev. the Dean of Ely, F.R.S. 1854. Liverpool...| Prof. G. G. Stokes, M.A., Sec. B.S. 1855. Glasgow .../Rev. Prof. Kelland, M.A., F.R.S. L. & E. 1856. Cheltenham] Rev. R. Walker, M.A., F.R.S. 1857. Dublin...... Rev. T. R. Robinson, D.D., F.R.S., M.R.LA. (1858. Leeds ......]|Rev. W. Whewell, D.D., V.P.R.S. b2 Rev. H. Coddington. Prof. Forbes. Prof. Forbes, Prof. Lloyd. AND PHYSICS. Prof. Sir W. R. Hamilton, Prof. Wheatstone. Prof. Forbes, W. 8S. Harris, F. W. Jerrard. W. 8. Harris, Rev. Prof. Powell, Prof. Stevelly. Rev. Prof. Chevallier, Major Sabine, Prof. Stevelly. J. D. Chance, W. Snow Harris, Prof. Stevelly. Rev. Dr. Forbes, Prof. Stevelly, Arch. Smith. Prof. Stevelly. Prof. M‘Culloch, Prof. Stevelly, Rev. W. Scoresby. J. Nott, Prof. Stevelly. Rev. Wm. Hey, Prof. Stevelly. Rey. H. Goodwin, Prof. Stevelly, G. G. Stokes, John Drew, Dr. Stokes. Rev. H. Price, Prof. Stevelly, G. G. Stokes. Dr. Stevelly, G. G. Stokes. Prof. Stevelly, G. G. Stokes, W. Ridout Wills. W.J.Macquorn Rankine, Prof. Smyth, Prof. Stevelly, Prof. G. G. Stokes. 8. Jackson, W. J. Macquorn Rankine, Prof. Stevelly, Prof. G. G. Stokes. Prof. Dixon, W. J. Macquorn Ran- kine, Prof. Stevelly, J. Tyndall. B. Blaydes Haworth, J. D. Sollitt, Prof. Stevelly, J. Welsh. J. Hartnup, H. G. Puckle, Prof. Stevelly, J. Tyndall, J. Welsh. Rev. Dr. Forbes, Prof. D. Gray, Prof. Tyndall. C. Brooke, Rev. T. A. Southwood, Prof. Stevelly, Rev. J. C. Turnbull. Prof. Curtis, Prof. Hennessy, P. A. Ninnis, W. J. Macquorn Rankine, Prof. Stevelly. Rey. 8. Earnshaw, J. P. Hennessy, Prof. Stevelly, H.J.S8.Smith, Prof, Tyndall. Stevelly, G.-G. XXxvl REPORT—1878. Date and Place Presidents Secretaries J. P. Hennessy, Prof. Maxwell, H. J. S. Smith, Prof. Stevelly. Rev. G C. Bell, Rev. T. Rennison, Prof. Stevelly. Prof. R. B. Clifton, Prof. H. J. 8. Smith, Prof. Stevelly. Prof. R. B. Clifton, Prof. H. J. S. Smith, Prof. Stevelly. Revy.N.Ferrers,Prof. Fuller, F. Jenkin, Prof. Stevelly, Rev. C. T. Whitley. Prof. Fuller, F. Jenkin, Rev. G, Buckle, Prof. Stevelly. Rey. T. N. Hutchinson, F. Jenkin, G. §. Mathews, Prof. H. J. 8. Smith, J. M. Wilson. Fleeming Jenkin, Prof. H.J.S.Smith, Rev. §. N. Swann. Rev. G. Buckle, Prof. G. C. Foster, Prof. Fuller, Prof. Swan. Prof. G. C. Foster, Rev. R. Harley, R. B. Hayward. Prof. G. C. Foster, R. B. Hayward, W. K. Clifford. Prof. W. G. Adams, W. K. Clifford, Prof. G. C. Foster, Rev. W. Allen Whitworth. Prof. W. G. Adams, J. T. Bottomley, Prof. W. K. Clifford, Prof. J. D. Everett, Rev. R. Harley. Prof. W. K. Clifford, J. W. L.Glaisher, Prof. A. 8. Herschel, G. F. Rodwell. Prof. W. K. Clifford, Prof. Forbes, J. W.L. Glaisher, Prof. A. S. Herschel. J. W. L. Glaisher, Prof. Herschel, Randal Nixon, J. Perry, G. F. Rodwell. Prof. W. F. Barrett, J.W.L. Glaisher, C. T. Hudson, G. F. Rodwell. Prof. W. F. Barrett, J. T. Bottomley, Prof. G. Forbes, J. W. L. Glaisher, T. Muir. Prof. W. F. Barrett, J. T. Bottomley, J. W. L. Glaisher, F. G. Landon. Prof. J. Casey, G. F. Fitzgerald, J. W. L. Glaisher, Dr. O. J. Lodge. COMMITTEE OF SCIENCES, II.—CHEMISTRY, MINERALOGY. James F. W. Johnston. 1859. Aberdeen...|The Earl of Rosse, M.A., K.P., F.RB.S. 1860. Oxford...... Rev. B. Price, M.A., F.R.S.... 1861. Manchester|G. B. Airy, M.A., D.C.L., E.R.S. 1862. Cambridge |Prof. G. G. Stokes, M.A., F.R.S. 1863. Newcastle |Prof.W.J. Macquorn Rankine C.E., F.R.S. 1864. Bath......... Prof. Cayley, M.A., F.R.S., F.R.A.S. 1865. Birmingham | W. Spottiswoode, M.A., F.R.S. F.R.A.S. 1866. Nottingham|Prof. Wheatstone, D.C.L., F.R.S. 1867. Dundee ...|Prof. Sir W. Thomson, D.C.L., F.R.S. 1868. Norwich ...|Prof. J. Tyndall, LL.D., F.R.S. 1869. Exeter......|Prof. J. J. Sylvester, LL.D., F.RBS. 1870. Liverpool...|J. Clerk Maxwell, M.A. LL.D., F.R.S. 1871. Edinburgh |Prof. P. G. Tait, F.R.S.E. ... 1872. Brighton ...|W. De La Rue, D.C.L., F.B.S. 1873. Bradford ...|Prof. H. J. 8S. Smith, F.R.8. 1874. Belfast...... Rev. Prof. J. H. Jellett, M.A., M.R.LA. 1875. Bristol...... Prof. Balfour Stewart, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S. 1876. Glasgow ...|Prof. Sir W. Thomson, M.A., D.C.L., F.B.S. 1877. Plymouth... |Prof.G. C. Foster, B.A., F.R.S., Pres. Physical Soc. 1878. Dublin...... Rev. Prof. Salmon, D.D., D.C.L., F.R.S. CHEMICAL SCIENCE. 1832. Oxford...... John Dalton, D.C.L., F.R.S. 1833. Cambridge !John Dalton, D.C.L., F.R.S. 1834, Edinburgh |Dr. Hope Prof. Miller. Mr. Johnston, Dr. Christison, PRESIDENTS AND SECRETARIES OF THE SECTIONS. XXXVli SECTION B.—CHEMISTRY AND MINERALOGY- Date and Place 1835 1836. 1837 1838 Presidents . Dublin...... Bristol ...... . Liverpool... . Newcastle 1839. Birmingham 1840 1841. 1842. 1843. 1844. 1845. 1846. 1847. 1848. 1849. 1850. 1851. 1852. 1853. 1854. 1855. 1856. 1857. 1858. 1859. 1860. 1861. 1862. 1863. 1864. 1865 1866 1867 1868 1869 . Glasgow ... Plymouth... Manchester Cambridge Southamp- ton Oxford...... Swansea Birmingham Edinburgh Ipswich ... Belfast...... seeeerene Liverpool Glasgow ... Cheltenham Aberdeen... Oxford...... Manchester Cambridge Newcastle Bath......... . Birmingham - Nottingham . Dundee . Norwich ... . Exeter .| Prof. Dr. T. Thomson, F.R.8. ...... Rev. Prof. Cumming Michael Faraday, F.R.S....... Rev. William Whewell,F.R.S. Prof. T. Graham, F.R.S. ...... Dr. Thomas Thomson, F.R.S. Dr. Daubeny, F.R.S. ......... John Dalton, D.C.L., F.R.S. Prof. Apjohn, M.R.I.A......... Prof. T. Graham, F.R.S. ...... Rev. Prof. Cumming eee eeeee Michael Faraday, D.C.L., F.R.S. Rev. W. V. Harcourt, M.A., E.R.S. ...|Richard Phillips, F.R.S. ...... John Percy, M.D., F.RB.S....... Dr. Christison, V.P.R.S.E. Prof. Thomas Graham, F.R.S8. Thomas Andrews, M.D.,F.R.S. Prof. J. F. W. Johnston, M.A., F.RB.S. Prof. W. A.Miller,M.D.,F.R.S. Dr. Lyon Playtair,C.B.,F.R.8. Prof. B. C. Brodie, F.R.S. ... Prof. Apjohn, M.D., F.R.S8., M.R.LA. Sir J. F. W. Herschel, Bart., D.C.L. Dr. Lyon Playfair, C.B.,F.R.S. Prof. B. C. Brodie, F.R.S...... Prof. W.A.Miller, M.D.,F.R.S. Prof. W.A.Miller, M.D.,F.R.S. Dr. Alex. W. Williamson, E.R.S. W.Odling, M.B.,F.R.S.,F.C.S. Prof. W. A. Miller, M.D., V.P.R.S. H. Bence Jones, M.D., F.R.S. T. Anderson, M.D., F.R.S.E. Prof. E. Frankland, F.R.S., F.C.S. Dr. H. Debus, F.R.S., F.C.S. Secretaries Dr. Apjohn, Prof. Johnston. Dr. Apjohn, Dr. C. Henry, W. Hera: path. Prof. Johnston, Prof. Miller, Dr. Reynolds. Prof. Miller, H. L. Pattinson, Thomas Richardson. Dr. Golding Bird, Dr. J. B. Melson. Dr. R. D. Thomson, Dr. T. Clark, Dr. L. Playfair. J. Prideaux, Robert Hunt, W. M. Tweedy. Dr. L. Playfair, R. Hunt, J. Graham. R. Hunt, Dr. Sweeny. Dr. L.Playfair, E.Solly,T. H. Barker. R. Hunt, J. P. Joule, Prof. Miller, E. Solly. Dr. Miller, R. Hunt, W. Randall. B. C. Brodie, R. Hunt, Prof. Solly. T. H. Henry, R. Hunt, T. Williams. R. Hunt, G. Shaw. Dr. Anderson, R. Hunt, Dr. Wilson. T. J. Pearsall, W. S. Ward. Dr. Gladstone, Prof. Hodges, Prof. Ronalds. H. 8. Blundell, Prof. R. Hunt, T. J. Pearsall. Dr.Edwards, Dr.Gladstone, Dr.Price. Prof. Frankland, Dr. H. E. Roscoe. J. Horsley, P. J. Worsley, Prof. Voelcker. Dr. Davy, Dr. Gladstone, Prof. Sul- ~ livan. Dr. Gladstone, W. Odling, R. Rey- nolds. J.S. Brazier, Dr. Gladstone, G. D. Liveing, Dr. Odling. A. Vernon Harcourt, G. D. Liveing, A. B. Northcote. A. Vernon Harcourt, G. D. Liveing. H. W. Elphinstone, W. Odling, Prof. Roscoe. Prof. Liveing, H. L. Pattinson, J. C. Stevenson. A.V.Harcourt, Prof. Liveing,R. Biggs. A. V. Harcourt, H. Adkins, Prof. Wanklyn, A. Winkler Wills. J. H. Atherton, Prof. Liveing, W. J. Russell, J. White. A. Crum Brown, Prof. G. D. Liveing, W. J. Russell. Dr. A. Crum Brown, Dr. W. J. Rus- sell, F, Sutton. Prof. A. Crum Brown, Dr. W. J. Russell, Dr. Atkinson. XXXVill Date and Place REPORT—1878. Presidents 1870. 1871. 1872. 1873. 1874. 1875. 1876. 1877. 1878. Liverpool... Edinburgh Brighton ... Bradford ... Belfast...... Bristol ...... Plymouth... Dublin seeeee FDWispElsiphCGsanseHtR, 9. -oscees Prof. H. E. Roscoe, F.R.S., F.C.S. Prof. T. Andrews, M.D., F.R.S. B.A., Dr. J. H. Gladstone, F.R.S.... Prof. W. J. Russell, F.R.S.... Prof. A. Crum Brown, M.D., F.R.S.E., F.C.S. A. G. Vernon Harcourt, M.A., F.R.S., F.C.S. F, A. Abel, F.R.S., F.C.S. Prof. Maxwell Simpson, M.D., F.R.S., F.C.S, Secretaries Prof. A. Crum Brown, A. E. Fletcher, Dr. W. J. Russell. J.T. Buchanan, W. N. Hartley, T. E. Thorpe. Dr. Mills, W. Chandler Roberts, Dr. W. J. Russell, Dr. T. Wood. Dr. Armstrong, Dr. Mills, W. Chand- ler Roberts, Dr. Thorpe. Dr. T. Cranstoun Charles, W. Chand- ler Roberts, Prof. Thorpe. Dr. H. E. Armstrong, W. Chandler Roberts, W. A. Tilden. ..|W. Dittmar, W. Chandler Roberts, J. M. Thomson, W. A. Tilden. ...|Dr. Oxland, W. Chandler Roberts, J. M. Thomson. W. Chandler Roberts, J. M. Thom- son, Dr. C. R. Tichborne, T. Wills. GEOLOGICAL (ann, untin 1851, GEOGRAPHICAL) SCIENCE. . Oxford . Dublin . Bristol COMMITTEE OF SCIENCES, III.—GEOLOGY AND GEOGRAPHY. seeeee . Liverpool... . Newcastle. . . Birmingham . Glasgow ... . Plymouth... , Manchester . Cambridge. . Southamp- ton R. I. Murchison, F.R.S. Bere este eee eeeeres ....-.|John Taylor. . Cambridge ./G. B. Greenough, F.R.S. ......| W. Lonsdale, John Phillips. . Edinburgh .| Prof. Jameson Prof. Phillips, T. Jameson Torrie, Rev. J. Yates, SECTION C.—GEOLOGY AND GEOGRAPHY. Reto eGnithithy pees .tesenesens cee Rev. Dr. Buckland, F.R.S.— Geography, R. 1. Murchison, E.R.S. Rev. Prof. Sedgwick, F.R.S.— Geography, G.B.Greenough, F.R.S. C. Lyell, F.R.S., V.P.G.S.— Geography, Lord Prudhope. Rev. Dr. Buckland, F.R.S.— Geography, G.B.Greenough, F.R.S. Charles Lyell, F.R.S.—Geo- graphy, G. B. Greenough, F.R.S. H. T. De la Beche, F.R.S. ... R. I. Murchison, F.R.S. Richard E. Griffith, F.R.S., M.R.LA. Henry Warburton, M.P., Pres. Geol. Soe. Rev. Prof. Sedgwick, M.A., F.R.S. Leonard Horner, F.R.S.—- Geo- graphy, G. B. Greenough, F.R.S. Captain Portlock, T. J. Torrie. William Sanders, S. Stutchbury, T. J. Torrie. Captain Portlock, R. Hunter.—Geo- graphy, Captain H. M. Denham, RN. W.C. Trevelyan, Capt. Portlock.— Geography, Capt. Washington. George Lloyd, M.D., H. E. Strick- land, Charles Darwin. W. J. Hamilton, D. Milne, Hugh Murray, H. E. Strickland, John Scoular, M.D. W.J. Hamilton, Edward Moore, M.D., R. Hutton. E. W. Binney, R. Hutton, Dr. R. Lloyd, H. E. Strickland. Francis M. Jennings, H. E. Strick- land. Prof. Ansted, E. H. Bunbury. Rev. J. C. Cumming, A. C. Ramsay, Rev. W. Thorp. Robert A. Austen, Dr. J. H. Norten, Prof. Oldham.—G'eography, Dr. C. T. Beke, i a i te el PRESIDENTS AND SECRETARIES OF THE SECTIONS.. Date and Place XXXIx Presidents Seeretaries 1847. Oxford...... 1848. Swansea... 1849. Birmingham Very Rev.Dr.Buckland,F.R.S. Sir H. T. De la Beche, C.B., F.R.S. Sir Charles F.G.S. Lyell, F.RB.S., Prof. Ansted, Prof. Oldham, A. C. | Ramsay, J. Ruskin. ‘Starling Benson, Prof. Prof. Ramsay. J. Beete Jukes, Prof. Oldham, Prof. A. C. Ramsay. Oldham, 1850. Edinburgh*|Sir Roderick I. Murchison, A. Keith Johnston, Hugh Miller, 1851. Ipswich 1852. Belfast...... 1853. Hull......... 1854. Liverpool.. 1855. Glasgow ... 1856. Cheltenham 1857. Dublin 1858. Leeds ...... 1859. Aberdeen... 1860. Oxford...... 1861. Manchester 1862. Cambridge 1863. Newcastle 1864. Bath......... 1865. Birmingham 1866. Nottingham 1867. Dundee 1868. Norwich ... 1869. Exeter ...... 1870. Liverpool... 1871. Edinburgh ...|Archibald Geikie, F.R.S. SECTION © (continued). Lieut.- Col. F.R.S. Prof. Sedgwick, F.R.S......... Prof. Edward Forbes, F,R.S. Portlock, R.E., Sir ReI. Murchison, F.R.S.... Prof. A. C. Ramsay, F.R.S.... The Lord Talbot de Malahide William Hopkins,M.A.,LL.D., F.R.S. “pat Sir Charles Lyell, LL. D., D.C.L., F.R.S. Rev. Prof. Sedgwick, LL.D., F.R.S.,. F.G.8. Sir R. I. Murchison, D.C.L., LL.D., F.R.S. J. Beete Jukes, M.A., F.R.S. Prof. Warington W. Smyth, F.R.S., F.G.S. Prof. J. Phillips, LL.D., E.R.S., F.G.S. Sir R. I. Murchison, Bart., K.C.B. Prof. A. C. Ramsay, LL.D., F.RB.S. F.BS., - F.G.S. R. A. C. Godwin-Austen, F.R.S., F.G.S. Prof. R. Harkness, F.R.S., F.G,8. Sir Philipde M.Grey Egerton, Bart., M.P., F.R.S. Prof. A. Geikie, F.R.S., F.G.S. Prof. Nicol. — GEOLOGY. ...| WilliamHopkins, M.A.,F.R.S.|C. J. F. Bunbury, G. W. Ormerod; Searles Wood. James Bryce, James MacAdan,. Prof. M‘Coy, Prof. Nicol. Prof. Harkness, William Lawton. John Cunningham, Prof. Harkness, . G. W. Ormerod, J. W. Woodall. James Bryce, Prof. Harkness, Prof. Nicol. Rey. P. B. Brodie, Rev. R. Hep- worth, Edward Hull, J. Scougall, T. Wright. Prof. Harkness, Gilbert Sanders, Robert H. Scott. Prof. Nicol, H. C. Sorby, E. W. Shaw. Prof. Harkness, Rey.. J. Longmuir,. H. C. Sorby. Prof. Harkness, Edward Hull, Capt.. D. C. L. Woodall. Prof. Harkness, Edward Hull, T.. Rupert Jones, G. W. Ormerod. Lucas Barrett, Prof. T. Rupert. Jones, H. C. Sorby. KH. F. Boyd, John Daglish, H. C. Sorby, Themas Sopwith. W. B. Dawkins, J. Johnston, H. C. Sorby, W. Pengelly. Rev. P. B. Brodie, J. Jones, Rev. E. Myers, H. C. Sorby, W. Pengelly.. R. Etheridge, W. Pengelly, T. Wil- sor, G. H. Wright. Edward Hull, W. Pengelly, Henry Woodward. Rey. O. Fisher, Rev. J. Gunn, W. Pengelly, Rev. H. H. Winwood. W. Pengelly, W. Boyd Dawkins, . Rev. H. H. Winwood. W. Pengeliy, Rev. H. H. Winwood, . W. Boyd Dawkins, G..H. Morton. . R. Etheridge, J. Geikie, J. McKenny: Hughes, L. C. Miall. * At ameeting of the General Committee held in 1850, it was resolved “ That the subject of Geography be separated from Geology and combined with Ethnology, to constitute a separate Secticn, under the title of the ‘Geographical and Ethno. - logical Section,’” for Presidents and Secretaries of which see page xxxix. xl Date and Place 1872. 1873. 1874. 1875. 1876. 1877. 1878. Brighton ... Bradford... Belfast...... Bristol...... Glasgow Plymouth... Dublin earns REPORT—1878. Presidents Secretaries F.G.S. ...|Prof. John Young, M.D. ...... Weibencelliy. HAR. S.s.-csenvsese F.S.A., F.G.S. Dr. Thomas Wright, F.R.S.E., John Evans, D.C.L., F.R.S., R. A. C. Godwin-Austen,|L. C. Miall, George Scott, William -F.RB.S. Topley, Henry Woodward. Prof. J. Phillips, D.C.L.,|L. C. Miall, R. H. Tiddeman, W. F.RB.S., F.G.S. Topley. ‘Prof. .Hull. M.A., F.R.S.,|/F. Drew, L. C. Miall, R. G. Symes, F.G.S. R. H. Tiddeman. L. C. Miall, E. B. Tawney, W. Top- ley. J. Armstrong, F. W. Rudler, W. Topley. Dr. Le Neve Foster, R. H. Tidde- man, W. Topley. E. T. Hardman, Prof. J. O’Reilly, R. H. Tiddeman. “BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES. “COMMITTEE OF SCIENCES, IV.—ZOOLOGY, BOTANY, PHYSIOLOGY, ANATOMY. 1832. 1833. 1834. 1835. 1836. 1837. 1858. 1839 1840. 1841. 1842. 1843. 1844. 1845. 1846. +1847. Oxford Cambridge* Edinburgh . neeeee Liverpool... Newcastle . Birmingham Glasgow ... Plymouth... Manchester Cambridge Southamp- ton Oxford Rev. P. B. Duncan, F.G.S. ... Prof. Graham He Renee were ere eeetene A Wiens eM GU eaivie. coaeences neceete Sir W. Jardine, Bart. ......... Prof. Oxren; Hitt.ssecesceres ves Sir W. J. Hooker, LL.D....... John Richardson, M.D., F.R.S. Hon. and Very Rev. W. Her- bert, LL.D., F.L.S. William Thompson, F.L.S. ... Very Rey. the Dean of Man- | chester. Rey. Prof. Henslow, F.L.S.... Sir J. Richardson, M.D., F.R.S,. |H. E. Strickland, M.A., F.R.S. Rey. W. L. P. Garnons, F.L.S. Rev. Prof. J. S. Henslow. C. C. Babington, D. Don. W. Yarrell, Prof. Burnett. SECTION D.—ZOOLOGY AND BOTANY. J. Curtis, Dr. Litton. J. Curtis, Prof. Don, Dr. Riley, S. Rootsey. C. C. Babington, Rev. L. Jenyns, W. Swainson. J. E. Gray, Prof. Jones, R. Owen, Dr. Richardson. E. Forbes, W. Ick, R. Patterson. Prof. W. Couper, E. Forbes, R. Pat- terson. J.Couch,Dr. Lankester, R. Patterson. Dr. Lankester, R. Patterson, J. A. Turner. G. J. Allman, Dr. Lankester, R. Patterson. Prof. Allman, H. Goodsir, Dr. King, Dr. Lankester. Dr. Lankester, T. V. Wollaston. Dr. Lankester, T. V. Wollaston, H. Wooldridge. Dr. Lankester, Dr. Melville, T. V. Wollaston. SECTION D (continued).—zOOLOGY AND BOTANY, INCLUDING PHYSIOLOGY. _ [For the Presidents and Secretaries of the Anatomical and Physiological Subsec- tions and the temporary Section E of Anatomy and Medicine, see p. xxxviii.] 1848. Swansea ...|L. W. Dillwyn, F.R.S..........|Dr. R. Wilbraham Falconer, A. Hen- nto): t | frey, Dr. Lankester. ‘1849. Birmingham | William Spence, F.R.S. ....../Dr. Lankester, Dr. Russell. “ ‘At this Meeting Physiology and Anatomy were made a separate Committee, for Presidents and Secretaries of which see p- XXXVili. PRESIDENTS AND SECRETARIES OF THE SECTIONS. Date and Place 1850. 1851. 1852. 1853. 1854. 1855. 1856. 1857. 1858. 1859. 1860. 1861. 1862. 1863. 1864. 1865. 1866. 1867. 1868. 1869. 1870. 1871. Edinburgh Tpswich Belfast...... Hull Liverpool... Glasgow ... Cheltenham Aberdeen.. Oxford...... Manchester Cambridge Newcastle sere e ees Birmingham Nottingham Dundee Norwich ... Liverpool... Edinburgh ...|Rev. Prof. Henslow, M.A., |Prof. W. H. Harvey, M.D., .| Sir W. Jardine, Bart., F.R.S.E. .|Prof. Sharpey, M.D., Sec. B.S. Presidents Prof. Goodsir, F.R.S. L. & E. F.R.S. IW. Osilloys eeeccaaccarestacosmn C. C. Babington, M.A., F.R.S. Prof. Balfour, M.D., F.R.S.... Rev. Dr. Fleeming, F.R.S.E. Thomas Bell, F.R.S., Pres.L.S. | F.R.S. C. C. Babington, M.A., F.R.S. Rev. Prof. Henslow, F.L.S... Prof. C. C. Babington, F.R.S Prof. Huxley, F.B.S. Prof. Balfour, M.D., F.R.S.... Dr. John E. Gray; F.R.S. T. Thomson, M.D., F.R.S. xli Secretaries Prof. J. H. Bennett, M.D., Dr. Lan- kester, Dr. Douglas Maclagan. Prof. Allman, F. W. Johnston, Dr. E. Lankester. Dr. Dickie, George C. Hyndman, Dr. Edwin Lankester. Robert Harrison, Dr. E. Lankester. Isaac Byerley, Dr. E. Lankester. | William Keddie, Dr. Lankester. Dr. J. Abercrombie, Prof. Buckman, Dr. Lankester. Prof. J. R. Kinahan, Dr. E. Lankester, Robert Patterson, Dr. W. E. Steele, Henry Denny, Dr. Heaton, Dr. E. Lankester, Dr. E. Perceval Wright. Prof. Dickie, M.D., Dr. E. Lankester, Dr. Ogilvy. .|W. 8. Church, Dr. E. Lankester, P. L. Sclater, Dr. E. Perceval Wright. .|Dr. T. Alcock, Dr. E. Lankester, Dr. P. L. Sclater, Dr. E. P. Wright. Alfred Newton, Dr. E. P. Wright. Dr. E. Charlton, A. Newton, Rev. H. B. Tristram, Dr. E. P. Wright. .|H. B. Brady, C. E. Broom, H. T. Stainton, Dr. E. P. Wright. .| Dr. J. Anthony, Rev. C. Clarke, Rev. H. B. Tristram, Dr. E. P. Wright. SECTION D (continued).—BIOLOGY.* Prof. Huxley, LL.D., F.R.S. —Physiological Dep., Prof. Humphry, M.D., F.R.S.— Anthropological Dep., Alf. R. Wallace, F.R.G.S. —Dep. of Zool. and Bot., George Busk, M.D., F.R.S. Rev. M. J. Berkeley, F.L.S. —Dep. of Physiology, W. H. Flower, F.R.S. George Busk, F.R.S., F.L.S. —Dep. of Bot. and Zool., C. Spence Bate, F.R.S.— Dep. of Ethno., E. B. Tylor. Prof. G. Rolleston, M.A., M.D., F.R.S., F.L.S.— Dep. of Anat. and Physiol., Prof. M. Foster, M.D., F.L.S.— Dep. of Ethno., J. ‘Evans, F.R.S. Prof. Allen Thomson, M.D., F.R.S.—Dep. of Bot. and Zool.,Prof. WyvilleThomson, F.R.S.—Dep. of Anthropol., Prof. W. Turner, M.D. Dr. J. Beddard, W. Felkin, Rev. H. B. Tristram, W. Turner, E. B. Tylor, Dr. E. P. Wright. C. Spence Bate, Dr. 8S. Cobbold, Dr. M. Foster, H. T. Stainton, Rey. H. B. Tristram, Prof. W. Turner. Dr. T. 8. Cobbold, G. W. Firth, Dr. M. Foster, Prof. Lawson, H. T. Stainton, Rev. Dr. H. B. Tristram, Dr. E. P. Wright. Dr. T. 8. Cobbold, Prof. M. Foster, E. Ray Lankester, Prof. Lawson, H. T Stainton, Rev. H. B. Tris- tram. Dr. T. 8. Cobbold, Sebastian Evans, Prof. Lawson, Thos. J. Moore, H. T. Stainton, Rev. H. B. Tristram, C. Staniland Wake, EK. Ray Lan- kester. Dr. T. R. Fraser, Dr. Arthur Gamgee, E. Ray Lankester, Prof. Lawson, H. T. Stainton, C. Staniland Wake, Dr. W. Rutherford, Dr. Kelburne King. * At a meeting of the General Committee in 1865, it was resolved :—“ That the title of Section D be changed to Biology ;”” and “That for the word ‘Subsection,’ in the rules for conducting the business of the Sections, the word ‘ Department’ besubstituted. xlii REPORT—1878. Date and Place Presidents 1872. Brighton ... 1873. Bradford ... 1874. Belfast seeeee 1875. Bristol 1876. Glasgow ... 1877. Plymouth... 1878. Dublin Sir J. Lubbock, Bart.,F.R.S.— Dep. of Anat. and Physiol., Dr. Burdon Sanderson, F.R.S.—Dep. of Anthropol., Col. A. Lane Fox, F.G.S8. Prof. Allman, F.R.S.— Dep. of Anat.and Physiol.,Prof. Ru- therford, M.D.— Dep. of An- thropol., Dr. Beddoe, F.R.S. Prof. Redfern, M.D.—Dep. of Zool. and Bot., Dr. Hooker, C.B.,Pres.R.S.—Dep. of An- throp., Sir W.R. Wilde, M.D. P. L. Selater, F.R.S.— Dep. of Anat.and Physiol.,Prof.Cle- land, M.D., F.R.S.—Dep. of Anthropol., Prof. Rolleston, M.D., F.B.S. A. Russel Wallace, F.R.G.S., F.L.S.—Dep. of Zool. and Bot., Prof. A. Newton, M.A., F.R.S.— Dep. of Anat. and Physiol., Dr. J. G. McKen- drick, F.R.S.E. J.GwynJeffreys, LL. D.,F.R.S.; F.L.8.—Dep. of Anat. and Physiol., Prof. Macalister, M.D.—Dep. of Anthropol. Francis Galton, M.A.,F.R.S. Prof. W. H. Flower, F.R.S.— Dep. of Anthropol., Prof. Huxley, Sec. R.S.—Dep. of Anat. and Physiol., R. McDonnell, M.D., F.R.S. Secretaries Prof. Thiselton- Dyer, H. T. Stainton, Prof. Lawson, F. W. Rudler, J. H. Lamprey, Dr. Gamgee, E. Ray Lankester, Dr. Pye-Smith. Prof. Thiselton-Dyer, Prof. Lawson, R. M‘Lachlan, Dr. Pye-Smith, E. Ray Lankester, F. W. Rudler, J. H. Lamprey. W.T. Thiselton- Dyer, R. O. Cunning- ham, Dr. J. J. Charles, Dr. P. H. Pye-Smith, J. J. Murphy, F. W. Rudler. E. R. Alston, Dr. McKendrick, Prof. W. R. M‘Nab, Dr. Martyn, F. W. Rudler, Dr. P. H. Pye-Smith, Dr. W. Spencer. E. R. Alston, Hyde Clarke, Dr. Knox, Prof. W. R. M‘Nab, Dr. Muirhead, Prof. Morrison Wat- son. E. R. Alston, F. Brent, Dr. D. J. Cunningham, Dr. C. A. Hingston, Prof. W. R. M‘Nab, J. B. Rowe, F. W. Rudler. Dr. R. J. Harvey, Dr. T. Hayden, Prof. W. R. M‘Nab, Prof. J. M. Purser, J. B. Rowe, F. W. Rudler. ANATOMICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL SCIENCES. COMMITTEE OF SCIENCES, V.—ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 1833. Cambridge 1834, Edinburgh OO tema w een eneeeeeens Oren enneeenee Dr. Bond, Mr. Paget. Dr. Roget, Dr. William Thomson. SECTION E. (UNTIL 1847.)—ANATOMY AND MEDICINE. 1835. Dublin 1836. Bristol ...... 1837. Liverpool... 1838. Newcastle 1839. Birmingham 1840. Glasgow ... 1841. Plymouth... 1842. Manchester 1843. Cork 1844 York st ereeees Dre Pritchards..cccessesed seosaee? Dr, Roget wh. Ras. ce: sodeeenet ne Prot. Wi Clark, MoD" peecesese Th. Headlam, (MeDs psn tee. John Yelloly, M.D., F.R.S.... James Watson, M.D. ......... P. M. Roget, M.D., Sec. B.S. Edward Holme, M.D., F.L.S. Sir James Pitcairn, M.D. .. |J. C. Pritchard, M.D. ......... Dr. Harrison, Dr. Hart. Dr. Symonds. Dr. J. Carson, jun., James Long, Dr. J. R. W. Vose. T. M. Greenhow, Dr. J. R. W. Vose. Dr. G. O. Rees, F. Ryland. Dr. J. Brown, Prof. Couper, Prof. Reid. , Dr. J. Butter, J. Fuge, Dr. R. 8. Sargent. Dr. Chaytor, Dr. R. 8. Sargent. .| Dr. John Popham, Dr. R. 8. Sargent. I. Erichsen, Dr. R. 8. Sargent. PRESIDENTS AND SECRETARIES OF THE SECTIONS. xlili Date and Place Presidents Secretaries SECTION E.—PHYSIOLOGY. 1845. Cambridge | Prof. J. Haviland, M.D. ......|Dr. R. 8. Sargent, Dr. Webster. 1846. Southamp- | Prof. Owen, M.D., F.R.S. ...)C. P. Keele, Dr. Laycock, Dr. Sar- ton gent. 1847. Oxford* ...| Prof. Ogle, M.D., F.R.S. ......|Dr. Thomas K. Chambers, W. P. j Ormerod. PHYSIOLOGICAL SUBSECTIONS OF SECTION D. 1850. Edinburgh | Prof. Bennett, M.D., F.R.S.E. 1855. Glasgow ...! Prof. Allen Thomson, F.R.S. | Prof. J. H. Corbett, Dr. J. Struthers. 1857. Dublin...... Prof. R. Harrison, M.D. ...... Dr. R. D. Lyons, Prof. Redfern. 1858. Leeds ..... Sir Benjamin Brodie, Bart.,|C. G. Wheelhouse. F.R.S. 1859. Aberdeen...) Prof. Sharpey, M.D., Sec.R.S.|Prof. Bennett, Prof. Redfern. 1860. Oxford...... |Prof. G. Rolleston, M.D.,|Dr. R. M*‘Donnell, Dr. Edward F.L.S. Smith. 1861. Manchester Dr. John Davy, F.R.S.L.& E.| Dr. W. Roberts, Dr. Edward Smith. 1862. Cambridge |C. E. Paget, M.D................ G. F. Helm, Dr. Edward Smith. 1863. Newcastle |Prof. Rolleston, M.D., F.R.S.|Dr. D. Embleton, Dr. W. Turner. 1864. Bath......... Dr. Edward Smith, LL.D.,|J. 8. Bartrum, Dr, W. Turner. F.R.S. 1865.Birminghm.} Prof. Acland, M.D., LL.D.,|Dr. A.-Fleming, Dr. P. Heslop, F.R.S. Oliver Pembleton, Dr. W. Turner. GEOGRAPHICAL AND ETHNOLOGICAL SCIENCES. {For Presidents and Secretaries for Geography previous to 1851, see Section C, p. Xxxiv. ] ETHNOLOGICAL SUBSECTIONS OF SECTION D. 1846.Southampton| Dr. Pritchard...................+ Dr. King. 1847. Oxford...... Prof. H. H. Wilson, M.A. ...|Prof. Buckley. WS WATSCA®.5e)|ldcecesoccocectcsccdsscdesecscacanaesase G. Grant Francis. 1849. Birmingham Dr. R. G. Latham. 1850. Edinburgh | Vice-Admiral Sir A. Malcolm! Daniel Wilson. SECTION E.—GEOGRAPHY AND ETHNOLOGY. 1851. Ipswich ...{Sir R. I. Murchison, F.R.S.,|R. Cull, Rev. J. W. Donaldson, Dr. Pres. R.G.S. Norton Shaw. 1852. Belfast...... Col. Chesney, R.A., D.C.L.,|R. Cull, R. MacAdam, Dr. Norton F.R.S. . Shaw. HSooe eal), .....5.: R. G. Latham, M.D., F.R.S. |R. Cull, Rev. H. W. Kemp, Dr. Norton Shaw. 1854. Liverpool...) Sir R. I. Murchison, D.C.L.,| Richard Cull, Rev. H. Higgins, Dr. 1855. 1856. 1857. Glasgow ...|Sir J. Richardson, F.R.S. M.D., F.R.S. Cheltenham|Col. Sir H. C. Rawlinson, sneer K.C.B. Rev. Dr. J. Henthorn Todd, Pres. R.I.A. Thne, Dr. Norton Shaw. Dr. W. G. Blackie, R. Cull, Dr. Norton Shaw. R. Cull, F. D. Hartland, W. H. Rumsey, Dr. Norton Shaw. R. Cull, 8. Ferguson, Dr. R. R. Madden, Dr. Norton Shaw. * By direction of the General Committee at Oxford, Sections D and E were incorporated under the name of “Section D—Zoology and Botany, including Phy- siology’’ (see p. xxxvi). The Section being then vacant was assigned in 1851 to Geography. + Vide note on page xxxvii. xliv Date and Place REPORT—1878. Presidents Secretaries 1858. Leeds ...... Sir R. I. Murchison, G.C.St.S.,|R. Cull, Francis Galton, P. O’Calla- F.R.S. ghan, Dr. Norton Shaw, Thomas Wright. 1859. Aberdeen...|Rear - Admiral Sir James] Richard Cull, Prof. Geddes, Dr. Nor- Clerk Ross, D.C.L., F.R.S. ton Shaw. 1860. Oxford...... Sir R. I. Murchison,* D.C.L.,|Capt. Burrows, Dr. J. Hunt, Dr. C. F.R.S. Lempriére, Dr. Norton Shaw. 1861. Manchester|John Crawfurd, F.R.S.......... Dr. J. Hunt, J. Kingsley, Dr. Nor- ton Shaw, W. Spottiswoode. 1862. Cambridge | Francis Galton, F.R.S.......... J. W. Clarke, Rev. J. Glover, Dr. Hunt, Dr. Norton Shaw, T. Wright. 1863. Newcastle |Sir R. I. Murchison, K.C.B.,|C. Carter Blake, Hume Greenfield, F.R.S. C. R. Markham, R. 8. Watson. 1864. Bath......... Sir R. I. Murchison, K.C.B.,|H. W. Bates, C. R. Markham, Capt. F.R.S. R. M. Murchison, T. Wright. 1865. Birmingham | Major-General Sir H. Raw-|H. W. Bates, 8. Evans, G. Jabet, C. linson, M.P., K.C.B., F.R.S.| R. Markham, Thomas Wright. 1866. Nottingham|Sir Charles Nicholson, Bart.,|H. W. Bates, Rev. E. T. Cusins, R. LL.D. H. Major, Clements R. Markham, D. W. Nash, T. Wright. 1867. Dundee ...|Sir Samuel Baker, F.R.G.S. |H. W. Bates, Cyril Graham, C. R. Markham, 8. J. Mackie, R. Stur- rock. 1868. Norwich ...|Capt. G. H. Richards, R.N.,/T. Baines, H. W. Bates, C. R. Mark- F.R.S. ham, T. Wright. SECTION E (continwed),—GHOGRAPHY. 1869. Exeter ...... Sir Bartle Frere, K.C.B.,/H. W. Bates, Clements R. Markham, LL.D., F.R.G.S. J. H. Thomas. 1870. Liverpool...|Sir R. I. Murchison, Bt.,/H.W.Bates, David Buxton, Albert J. K.C.B., LuL.D., D.C.L.,} Mott, Clements R. Markham. F.R.S., F.G.S. 1871. Edinburgh | Colonel Yule, C.B., F.R.G.S. |Clements R. Markham, A. Buchan, J. H. Thomas, A. Keith Johnston. 1872. Brighton ...| Francis Galton, F.R.S.......... H. W. Bates, A. Keith Johnston, Rev. J. Newton, J. H. Thomas. 1873. Bradford ...|Sir Rutherford Alcock, K.C.B.|H. W. Bates, A. Keith Johnston, Clements R. Markham. 1874. Belfast...... Major Wilson, R.E., F.R.S.,|E.G. Ravenstein, E. C. Rye, J. H. F.R.G.S. Thomas. 1875. Bristol...... Lieut. - General Strachey,|H. W. Bates, EH. C. Rye, F. F. R.E.,C.8.L,F.B.5S., F.R.G.S.,| Tuckett. F.L.S., F.G.S. 1876. Glasgow ...|Capt. Evans, C.B., F.R.S....... H. W. Bates, E. C. Rye, R. Oliphant Wood. 1877. Plymouth... |Adm. Sir E. Ommanney, ©.B.,|H. W. Bates, F. E. Fox, E. C. Rye. F.R.S., F.R.G.S., F.R.A.S. 1878. Dublin...... Prof. Sir C. Wyville Thom-|John Coles, E. C. Rye. son, LL.D., F.R.S. L. & E. STATISTICAL SCIENCE. COMMITTEE OF SCIENCES, VI.—STATISTICS. 1833. Cambridge | Prof. Babbage, F.R.S. .........(J. E. Drinkwater. 1834. Edinburgh | Sir Charles Lemon, Bart....... Dr. Cleland, C. Hope Maclean. PRESIDENTS AND SECRETARIES OF THE SECTIONS. xlv Date and Place Presidents Secretaries 1836 1837 SECTION F.—STATISTICS. 1835. Dublin...... Charles Babbage, F.R.S. ...... . Bristol...... Sir Chas. Lemon, Bart., F.R.S. . Liverpool...| Rt. Hon. Lord Sandon......... 1838 1839 1840 1841 1842 1843. 1844. 1845 . Newcastle |Colonel Sykes, F.R.S. ......... . Birmingham| Henry Hallam, F.R.S.......... . Glasgow ...| Rt. Hon. Lord Sandon, M.P., F.R.S. . Plymouth...} Lieut.-Col. Sykes, F.R.S....... . Manchester |G. W. Wood, M.P., F.L.S. ... Cork’... Sir C. Lemon, Bart., M.P. ... BYOTK. ccccesse Lieut.- Col. Sykes, F.R.S., F.L.S. . Cambridge | Rt. Hon. the Earl] Fitzwilliam 1846. Southamp- |G. R. Porter, F.R.S. ............ ton 1847. Oxford...... Travers Twiss, D.C.L.. F.R.S. 1848. Swansea ... J. H. Vivian. M.P., F.R.S. 1849. Birmingham| Rt. Hon. Lord Lyttelton...... 1850. Edinburgh |Very Rev. Dr. John Lee, V.P.R.S.E. 1851. Ipswich ...|Sir John P. Boileau, Bart. ... 1852. Belfast...... His Grace the Archbishop of Dublin. 1853. Hull......... James Heywood, M.P., F.R.S. 1854. Liverpool.../Thomas Tooke, F.R.S. ......... 1855. Glasgow .../R. Monckton Milnes, M.P. ... SECTION F (continwed).—ECONOMIC 1856. Cheltenham| Rt. Hon. Lord Stanley, M.P. 1857. Dublin...... His Grace the Archbishop of Dublin, M.R.1A. 1858. Leeds ....... Edward Baines .........ssee0ee 1859. Aberdeen...|Col. Sykes, M.P., F.R.S. ...... 1860. Oxford...... Nassau W. Senior, M.A. ...... 1861. Manchester | William Newmarch, F.R.S.... 1862. Cambridge | Edwin Chadwick, C.B. ........ 1863. Newcastle .| William Tite, M.P., F.R.S.... 1864. Bath......... William Farr, M.D., D.C.L., 1865. Birmingham Rt. Hon, Tord Stanley, LL.D., 1866. Nottingham prof 3 - H. T, Rogers......2..0.. W. Greg, Prof. Longfield. Rev. J. E. Bromby, C. B. Fripp, James Heywood. W. R. Greg, W. Langton, Dr. W. C. Tayler. W. Cargill, J. Heywood, W.R. Wood. F. Clarke, R. W. Rawson, Dr. W. C. Tayler. C. R. Baird, Prof. Ramsay, R. W. Rawson. Rev. Dr. Byrth, Rev. R. Luney, R. W. Rawson. Rey. R. Luney, G. W. Ormerod, Dr. W. C. Tayler. Dr. D. Bullen, Dr. W. Cooke Tayler. J. Fletcher, J. Heywood, Dr. Lay- cock. J. Fletcher, Dr. W. Cooke Tayler. J. Fletcher, F. G. P. Neison, Dr. W. C. Tayler, Rev. T. L. Shapcott. Rev. W. H. Cox, J. J. Danson, F. G. P. Neison. J. Fletcher, Capt. R. Shortrede. Dr. Finch, Prof. Hancock, F. G. P. Neison. Prof. Hancock, J. Fletcher, Dr. J. Stark. J. Fletcher, Prof. Hancock. Prof. Hancock, Prof. Ingram, James MacAdam, jun. Edward Cheshire, Wm. Newmarch. KE. Cheshire, J. T. Danson, Dr. W. H. Duncan, W. Newmarch. J. A. Campbell, E. Cheshire, W. New- march, Prof. R. H. Walsh. SCIENCE AND STATISTICS. Rev. C. H. Bromby, E. Cheshire, Dr. W. N. Hancock, W. Newmarch, W. M. Tartt. Prof. Cairns, Dr. H. D. Hutton, W. Newmarch, T. B. Baines, Prof. Cairns, 8. Brown, Capt. Fishbourne, Dr. J. Strang. Prof, Cairns, Edmund Macrory, A. M. Smith, Dr. John Strang. Edmund Macrory, W. Newmarch, Rev. Prof. J. E. T. Rogers. David Chadwick, Prof. R. C. Christie, EK. Macrory, Rev. Prof. J. E. T. Rogers. H. D. Macleod, Edmund Macrory. T. Doubleday, Edmund Macrory, Frederick Purdy, James Potts. E. Macrory, E. T. Payne, F. Purdy. G. J. D. Goodman, G. J. Johnston, E. Macrory. R. Birkin, jun., Prof. Leone Levi, E. Macrory. xlvi REPORT— 1878. Date and Place Presidents 1867. 1868. 1869. Dundee .... Norwich .... Exeter seeeee . Liverpool... 71. Edinburgh 72. Brighton... 73. Bradford ... 1836. 1837. 1838. 1839. 1840. 1841. 1842. 1843 1844. 1845. 5. Bristol . Belfast...... . Glasgow ... 7. Plymouth... . Dublin we eeee Bristol Liverpool... Newcastle Birmingham Glasgow .. Plymouth Manchester se eeeneee Cambridge 1846,Southampton 1847. 1848. 1849. 1850. 1851. 1852. 1853. 1854. 1855. 1856. 1857. Qxford! <2... Swansea ... Birmingham Edinburgh Liverpool... Glasgow .. Cheltenham .|M. E. Grant Duff, M.P. ..|Sir John Robinson Aves oe Samuel Brown, Pres. Instit. Actuaries. Rt. Hon. Sir Stafford H. North- cote, Bart., C.B., M.P. Prof. W. Stanley Jevons, M.A. Rt. Hon. Lord Neaves Prof. Henry Fawcett, M.P.... Rt. Hon. W. E. Forster, M.P. Lord O’Hagan seen eeee emer e ter eerenease James Heywood, M.A., F.R.S., Pres.8.5. Sir George Campbell, K.C.S8.L., M.P. Rt. Hon. the Earl Fortescue Prof. J. K. Ingram, LL.D., M.R.LA. Secretaries Prof. Leone Levi, E. Macrory, A. J. Warden. Rev. W.C. Davie, Prof. Leone Levi. Edmund Macrory, Frederick Purdy, Charles T. D. Acland. Chas. R. Dudley Baxter, E. Macrory, J. Miles Moss. J. G. Fitch, James Meikle. J. G. Fitch, Barclay Phillips. J. G. Fitch, Swire Smith. Prof. Donnell, Frank P. Fellows, Hans MacMordie. F. P. Fellows, T. G. P. Hallett, E. Macrory. A, M‘Neel Caird, T. G. P. Hallett, Dr. W. Neilson Hancock, Dr. W. Jack, W. F. Collier, P. Hallett, J. T. Pim. W. J. Hancock, C. Molloy, J. T. Pim. MECHANICAL SCIENCE. SECTION G.—MECHANICAL SCIENCE. Davies Gilbert, D.C.L., F.R.S. Rey. Dr. Robinson Charles Babbage, F.R.S....... Prof. Willis, F.R.S., and Robt. Stephenson. Penne eeenenee John Taylor, HRS. \.nvs-ss--sn. Rev. Prof. Willis, F'.R.S.... Prof, J. Macneill, M.R.LA ... John Taylor, F'.R.S. ............ George Rennie, F.R.8. Rev. Prof. Willis, M.A., F.R.S. Rey. Professor Walker, M.A., F.R.S. Rey. Professor Walker, M.A., F.RB.S. Robert Stephenson, M.P., E.R.S. Revah HODINSONC.seccsce eee ..| William Cubitt, F.R.S.......... John Walker, C.E., LL.D., F.R.S. William Fairbairn, C.E., E.R.S. John Scott Russell, F.R.S. Macquorn Rankine, C.E., F.R.S. George Rennie, F.R.S.......... Rt. Hon. the Earl of Rosse, F.R.S. T. G. Bunt, G. T. Clark, W. West. Charles Vignoles, Thomas Webster. R. Hawthorn, C. Vignoles, T. Webster. W. Carpmael, William Hawkes, T. Webster. J. Scott Russell, J. Thomson, J. Tod, C. Vignoles. Henry Chatfield, Thomas Webster. .|J. F, Bateman, J. Scott Russell, J. Thomson, Charles Vignoles. James Thomson, Robert Mallet. Charles Vignoles, Thomas Webster. Rev. W. T. Kingsley. William Betts, jun., Charles Manby. J. Glynn, R. A. Le Mesurier. R. A. Le Mesurier, W. P. Struvé. Charles Manby, W. P. Marshall. Dr. Lees, David Stephenson. John Head, Charles Manby. John F. Bateman, C. B. Hancock, Charles Manby, James Thomson. James Oldham, J. Thomson, W. Sykes Ward. John Grantham, J. Oldham, J. Thomson. L. Hill, jun., William Ramsay, J. Thomson. C. Atherton, B. Jones, jun., H. M. Jeffery. Prof. Downing, W.T. Doyne, A. Tate, James Thomson, Henry Wright. Date and Place 1858. Leeds 1859. 1860. 1861. Manchester 1862. 1863. Cambridge Newcastle 1864. Bath. 1865. Birmingham Hee eeeene 1866. Nottingham 1867. Dundee seeeee 1868. 1869. 1870. Exeter ...... Liverpool... 1871. Edinburgh 1872. Brighton ... 1873. Bradford ... 1874. 1875. feweee seneee LIST OF EVENING Presidents William Fairbairn, F.R.S. ... Rev. Prof. Willis, M.A., F.R.S. Prof.W.J. Macquorn Rankine, LL.D., F.R.S. J. F. Bateman, O.E., F.R.S.... Wm. Fairbairn, LL.D., F.R.S. Rev. Prof. Willis, M.A., F.R.S. J. Hawkshaw, F.R.S. ........ Sir W. G. Armstrong, LL.D., F.R.S. Thomas Hawksley, V.P.Inst. C.E., F.G.S. Prof.W.J. Macquorn Rankine, LL.D., F.RB.S. G. P. Bidder, C.E., F.R.G.S. C. W. Siemens, F.R.S.......... Chas. B. Vignoles, C.E., F.R.S. Prof. Fleeming Jenkin, F.R.S. F. J. Bramwell, C.E. ee eressee W. H. Barlow, F.B.S. ......... Prof. James Thomson, LL.D., C.E., F.R.S.E. W. Froude, C.E., M.A., F.R.S. -|C. W. Merrifield, F.R.S. ...... Edward Woods, C.E. Edward Easton, C.E. LECTURES. xlvii Secretaries J. C. Dennis, J. Dixon, H. Wright. R. Abernethy, P. Le Neve Foster, H. Wright. P. Le Neve Foster, Rev. F. Harrison, Henry Wright. P. Le Neve Foster, John Robinson, H. Wright. W. M. Fawcett, P. Le Neve Foster. P. Le Neve Foster, P. Westmacott, J. F. Spencer. .|B. Le Neve Foster, Robert Pitt. P. Le Neve Foster, Henry Lea, W. P. Marshall, Walter May. P. Le Neve Foster, J. F, Iselin, M. A. Tarbottom. P. Le Neve Foster, John P. Smith, W. W. Urquhart. P. Le Neve Foster, J. F. Tselin, C. Manby, W. Smith. |P. Le Neve Foster, H. Bauerman. |H. Bauerman, P. Le Neve Foster, T. King, J. N. Shoolbred. 'H. Bauerman, Alexander Leslie, J. P. Smith. \H. M. Brunel, P. Le Neve Foster, J. G. Gamble, J. N. Shoolbred. Crawford Barlow, H. Bauerman, E. H. Carbutt, J. C. Hawkshaw, J. N. Shoolbred. A. T. Atchison, J. N. Shoolbred, John Smyth, jun. |W. R. Browne, H. M. Brunel, J. G. Gamble, J. N. Shoolbred. W. Bottomley, jun., W. J. Millar, J. N. Shoolbred, J. P. Smith. A. T. Atchison, Dr. Merrifield, J. N, Shoolbred. A. T. Atchison, R. G. Symes, H. T. Wood. List of Evening Lectures. Lecturer Charles Vignoles, F.R.S....... Sir M. I. Brunel R. I. Murchison.............000.. Prof. Owen, M.D., F.R.S....... Prof. E. Forbes, F.R.S.......... Orem ere reeeree DT HODINSON'. <<<. ..cssens see «ae Charles Lyell, F.R.S. ......... Dr. Falconer, F.RB.S............. G.B.Airy,F.R.S.,Astron.Royal R. I. Murchison, F.R.S. ..... Prof. Owen, M.D., F.R.S. Charles Lyell, F.R.S. ......... Subject of Discourse The Principles and Construction of Atmospheric Railways. The Thames Tunnel. The Geology of Russia. The Dinornis of New Zealand. The Distribution of Animal Life in the Aigean Sea, The Earl of Rosse’s Telescope. Geology of North America. The Gigantic Tortoise of the Siwalik Hills in India. Progress of Terrestrial Magnetism. -|Geology of Russia. ...| Fossil Mammalia of the British Isles. Valley and Delta of the Mississippi, xlvili REPORT—1878. Date and Place 1846. 1847. 1848. 1849. 1850. 1851. 1852. 1853. 1854, 1855. 1856. 1857. 1858. 1859. 1860. 1861. 1862. 1863. 1864. Southamp- ton—cont. Swansea ... Birmingham Edinburgh Ipswich ... Belfast...... Liverpool.. Glasgow ... Cheltenham aeeeee Aberdeen... Oxfordee.22/ FRO 30) OTaNOR jo W0TyB.L0[ Ax Ay D's F —: SurjoopT Ynours]g yv opeutsyuvin, “ OL9 OL ‘* qnourdT{ ye ,, SIOTIOg Fo vaqyrUIMMOD ,, Jo sosuedxm “ 0 & FOT (avok [—y00I49 o[IeMIEGTY) sosuodxy soqJQ puke quay “ 0 0 CRS eee eee eee eee eee eee errr ee eee rere reer rere eee ee (avakt 10) SOLIBleg “ 9 I 699 ORCC E ROCCE e Eee eee ry (Mossepy) “ATX “TOA ‘SUTIOO yi9¢ jo yaodoy Surpurg pue ‘SuraeZuq ‘Suyung “ y LL OTP “'sosuodxy [eyueprouy pur ‘suistyteapy “curpurg ‘Sutyutrg Aipung ose ‘surjeoyy Ynourk{g jo sosuedxg preg ea 7 “SSINHWAVd *QLST SFL gsnbny on omoocotn G 8 F6LEF "BIST ‘e waquaoag” yf f UTMOTA "A AL “sLoUp NT UGLSOT ATUVO “HO eens VT iq NUWUV A streseessersscratieid JO soured popuedxoun sv ,.‘e099Tu “Moy orjemodoryyuy,, a4 Jo “aIeq “AG kq peuinyary yuVg IojsulUyseA, puwe wopuoTy 4e y1sodeq uo 4ser0}UT srresesseroo ‘STOTIVUO “oUTZoOT YJNouATY Sutmp sieq “Wd 0} Siodvg Jo UOISsIMSsUvIT, IOF stuNs [[eUS Aspung SSESLERGCPIOCCIDGO Ey dg aje nals od Sense MOBSETN "TAX ‘[OA ‘stoTywoTTGng Jo oTeg ff eeeeee seen eeereneee BeOROUGTS Pyaaks| uo spuepraAlq. “ rereeeees OnaTD OID S}OIOLT Sorpwgt se OTD — OIMTP SJOYOL, ,So7VlOossy fe “ oTp 014 Tp suordriosqng jenuuy sé cerseseeseveveeneneneseentnerenrneeetiestes® QOUTS PUG surjoo YnoudyTg ye guoyyfsodnro) OJ] LOZ poatoooyy Il FI SSL sereeeeerens SOTIOOTL yynowmdTg * JUNODOYV 4Sel WOT, oOUR[eY OT, ‘8 F ‘SuIyOOW Ulu ye sydrooer Surpuput yon’ ‘*SZ8T “FL ysnsny 03 ‘(Suyo9W HLNAOWATd Jo Fuouoousumoo) 2/87 ‘pl ysnsuy wo TNOOOOV S.UMUOSVAUL IVAANAD WAL ? ‘SLdIGOLa “HONAIOS JO LNANWHONVACY AHL YOX NOLLVIOOSSV HSILIGd FHL lili OFFICERS OF SECTIONAL COMMITTEES PRESENT AT THE DUBLIN MEETING. SECTION A.—MATHEMATIOCS AND PHYSICS. President.— Rev. Professor Salmon, Dl, D.C.L., LL.D., F.R.S., M.R.LA. Vice-Presidents.—Professor R. S. Ball, LL.D., F.R.S.; Rev. Professor S Haughton, LL.D., F.R.S.; Professor Henry Hennessy, F.R.S., M.R.I.A; Dr. T. A. Hirst, F.R.S.; General Menabrea; Rev. Dr. Molloy, M.R.I.A.; Rev. Professor S. J. Perry, F.R.S.; Professor John Purser, M.R.I.A.; Professor H. J. S. Smith, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S.; G. Johnstone Stoney, M.A., F.R.S., M.R.LA. ; Professor J. J. Sylvester, LL.D., F.R.S.; Sir Wiliam Thomson, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S.; Rev. Professor R. Townsend, F.R.S., M.R.LA. Secretaries.—Professor John Casey, LL.D., F.R.S., M.R.LA.; G. F. Fitz- gerald, M.A., F.T.C.D., MRI.A.; J. W. L. Glaisher, M.A., F.R.S.; Oliver J. Lodge, D.Sc. SECTION B.—CHEMISTRY AND MINERALOGY, INCLUDING THEIR APPLICATIONS TO AGRICULTURE AND THE ARTS. President.—Professor Maxwell Simpson, M.D., F.R.S., F.C.S. Vice-Presidents.—Professor Apjohn, F.R.S., F.C.S.; Wm. Crooker, F.R.S. ; Professor Dewar, F.R.S.; Dr. J. H. Gladstone, F.R.S.; Sir R. Kane, F.R.S.; Dr. Longstaff, F.C.S.; Professor J. Emerson Rey- nolds, M.D., F.C.S., M.R.I.A.; Professor Roscoe, F.R.S.; Professor Rowney, F.C.S.; Professor A. W. Williamson, F.R.S. Secretaries —W. Chandler Roberts, F.R.S8.; J. M. Thomson, F.C.S.; C. R. Tichborne, M.D.; T. Wills, F.C.S. e SECTION C.—GEOLOGY. President.—John Evans, D.C.L., F.R.S., F.S.A., F.G.S. Vice-Presidents.—Rev. Maxwell Close, F.G.S.; Professor W. Boyd Dawkins, M.A., F.R.S.; Sir R. Griffith, Bart., LL.D.; Rev. Pro- fessor Haughton, LL:.D., F.R.S.; Professor T. M‘K. Hughes, M.A., F.R.S.; Professor Hull, M.A., F.R.S.; J. Gwyn Jeffreys, LL.D., F.R.S.; W. Pengelly, F.R.S.; H.C. Sorby, F.R.S., Pres. G.S. Secretaries —H. T. Hardman, F.C.S.; Professor J. O’Reilly, C.E., M.R.I.A; R. H. Tiddeman, M.A., F.G.S. SECTION D.—BIOLOGY. President.—Professor W. H. Flower, F.R.S., F.L.S., F.G.S. Vice-Presidents—W. Archer, F.R.S.; Professor Alexander Dickson ; Lord Gough; Sir Joseph Hooker, K.C.8.I., Pres. R.S.; Professor Huxley, Sec. R.S.; Sir John Lubbock, Bart., M.P., D.C.L., F.R.S. ; Professor Macalister, M.D.; R. M‘Donncll, M.D., F.R.S.; Dr. Allen Thomson, F.R.S.; Professor W. C. Williamson, F.R.S. Secretaries.—Dr. R. J. Harvey ; Dr. T. Hayden; Professor W. R. M‘Nab, *M.D.; Professor J. M. Purser, M.D.; J. Brooking Rowe, F.L.S.; F. W. Rudler, F.G.S. ; liv REPORT—1 878. SECTION E.—GEOGRAPHY. President.—Professor Sir C. Wyville Thomson, LL.D., F.R.S.L. & E., E.G.S., F.L.S. Vice-Presidents—Captain R. F. Burton, F.R.G.S., H.B.M. Consul, Trieste ; Sir Walter Elliot, K.C.S.I., F.R.S.; Sir Rawson W. Rawson, K.C.M.G., C.B., F.R.G.S.; The Right Hon. Lord Talbot de Malahide, F.R.S. ; Captain Verney, R.N., F.R.G.S.; Major C. W. Wilson, C.B., R.E., F.R.S., F.R.G.S. Seeretaries—John Coles, F.R.G.S., Curator of the Map Collection R.G.S. ; H. C. Rye, F.Z.S., Librarian R.G.S. SECTION F.—ECONOMIC SCIENCE AND STATISTICS. President.—Professor J. K. Ingram, LL.D., M.R.1.A. Vice-Presidents——The Attorney-General for Ireland, M.P.; Dr. Burke ; Sir George Campbell, K.C.8.L., M.P., F.R.S.; Lord Emly ; W. Neil- son Hancock, LL.D., M.R.I.A.; G. Shaw Lefevre, M.P.; John Lentaigne, C.B.; Right Hon. M. Longfield, LL.D.; Sir James Watson. Secretaries —W. J. Hancock, F.I.A; Constantine Molloy, M.A.; J. -T. Pim. SECTION G.—MECHANICAL SCIENCE. President.—Edward Easton, C.E. Vice-Presidents—C. Bergeron, C.E.; F. J. Bramwell, C.E., F.R.S. ; Pro- ‘fessor Downing, LL.D.; Captain Douglas Galton, OC.B., F.R.S.;. Howard Grubb, F.R.A.S.; Sir John Hawkshaw, C.E., F.R.S. ; Robert Manning ; Parke Neville, C.E.; B. B. Stoney, H.C. ; Professor James Thomson, C.E., F.R.S. Seeretaries—A. T. Atchison, M.A.; R. G. Symes, M.A.; H. Trueman Wood, B.A, OFFICERS AND COUNCIL, 1878-79. PRESIDENT. WILLIAM SPOTTISWOODH, Esq., M.A., D.C.L., LL.D,, Pres. R.S., F.R.A.S., F.R.G.S. VICE-PRESIDENTS. ° The Right Hon. the Lornp Mayor oF DUBLIN. The Right Hon. the EArt or Rossz, B.A., D.C.L., The Provost oF TRINITY COLLEGE, DUBLIN. F.RB.S., F.R.A.S., M.R.LA. His Grace the DUKE OF ABERCORN, K.G. The Right Hon. LORD O’HAGAN, M.R.I.A. The Right Hon. the EARL oF ENNISKILLEN, D.C.L.,} Professor G. G. STokus, M. Ie D.C.L., LL.D., F.R.S., F.G.S., M.R.1.A. Sec. R.S. PRESIDENT ELECT. PROFESSOR G. J. ALLMAN, M.D., F.R.S. L. & E., F.L‘S., M.R.ILA. VICE-PRESIDENTS ELECT. His Grace the DuKE or DEVONSHIRE, K.G., M.A.,| The MAsTER CUTLER. LL.D., F.R.S., F.R.G.S. Professor T, H. HuxnEy, Ph.D., LL. D., Séc. R.S., The Right Hon. the Earn Firzwi11AM, K.G,, F.L.S., F.G.S. F.R.G.S. Professor W. ODLING, M.B., F.R.S., F.C.S. The Right Hon. the HARL OF WHARNCLIFFE,F.R.G.S. LOCAL SECRETARIES FOR THE MEETING AT SHEFFIELD. H. Cumron Sorsy, Esq., F.R.S., F.G.S. J. F. Moss, Esq. LOCAL TREASURER FOR THE MEETING AT SHEFFIELD. HENRY STEPHENSON, Esq. ORDINARY MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL. ABEL, F. A., Esq., C.B., F.R.S. LEFEVRE, GEORGE SHAW, Esq., M.P. ADAMS, Professor W. G., F.R.S, my MASKELYNE, Professor N. S., ERS. Bartow, W. H., Esq., F.R.S. NEWTON, Professor A., F.R. 3. BRAMWELL, F. J., Esq., C.E., F.R.S. OMMANNEY, Admiral Sir E., C.B., F.R.S CAYLEY, Professor, F.R.S. PENGELLY, W. ; Hsq., FR. s Hyans, Captain, C.B., F.R.S. PRESTWICH, Professor J., F.R.S. Evans, J., Esq., F.R.S. RAYLEIGH, Lord, F.R.S. Farr, Dr. W., F.R.S. ROLLESTON, Professor G., F.R.S. Foster, Professor G. C., F.R.S. Roscog, Professor H. E., *B.RS. FrRovupDE, W., Esq., F.R.S. RUSSELL, ADins Me haa ae RS. GLAISHER, J. W. L., Esq., F.R.S. SANDERSON, Prof. at, S. Burpon, F.R.S. Heywoop, J., Esq., F.R.S. SMYTH, WARINGTON W., Esq., F.R.S. Huears, W., Esq., F.R.S, GENERAL SECRETARIES. Capt. DovaLas GALTON, C.B., D.C.L., F.R.S., F.G.S., 12 Chester Street, Grosvenor Place, London, 8.W. Pump LUTLEY ScLATER, Esq., M.A., Ph, D., F, R.S., B, L.8., 11 Hanover Square, London, W. ASSISTANT SECRETARY. J. E. H. Gorpon, Esq., B.A. GENERAL TREASURER. Professor A. W. WILLIAMSON, Ph.D., F.R.S., F.C.S., University College, London, W.C. EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL. The Trustees, the President and President Elect, the Presidents of former years, the Vice-Presidents and Vice-Presidents Elect, the General Secretaries for the present and former years, the late Assistant General Secretary, the General Treasurers for the present and former years, and the Local Treasurer and Secretaries for the ensuing Meeting. TRUSTEES (PERMANENT). General Sir EDWARD SABINE, K.C.B., R.A., D.C.L., F.R.S. Sir PHILIP DE M. GREY EGERTON, Bart., M.P., F.R.S., F.G:S. Sir JOHN LUBBOCK, Bart., M.P., F.R.S., F.L.S. PRESIDENTS OF FORMER YEARS, The Duke of Devonshire. Richard Owen, M.D., D.C.L. Prof. Sir Wm. Thomson, P.C.L. The Rey. T. R. Robinson, D.D. Sir W. G. Armstrong, C.B., LL.D.| Dr. Carpenter, C.B., F.R. e Sir G. B. Airy, Astronomer Royal. | Sir William R, Grove, F.R.S. Prof. Williamson, Ph.D., F.R.S. General Sir E. Sabine, K.C.B. The Duke of Buccleuch, K.G. Prof. Tyndall, D. ‘O.L. ay HRS. The Earl of Harrowby. Sir Joseph D. Hooker, D.C.L. Sir John Hawkshaw, C.E., F.R.S. The Duke of Argyll. Professor Stokes, M.A., D.C.L. Prof, T. Andrews, M. D., F.R.S. The Rey. H. Lloyd, D.D. Prof. Huxley, LL.D., Sec. R.S. Prof, Allen Thomson, F.R.S. GENERAL OFFICERS OF FORMER YEARS. F, Galton, Esq., F.R.S. Gen. Sir E. Sabine, K.C.B., F.R.S. | Dr. Michael Foster, F.R.S. Dr. T. A. Hirst, F.R.S. W. Spottiswoode, Esq., F.R.S. George Griffith, Esq., M.A. AUDITORS. Warren De La Rue, Esq., F.R.S. | Professor W. H. Flower, F.R.S. | Professor G. C. Foster, F.R.S. lvi REPORT—1878. Report of the Council for the Year 1877-78, presented to the General Committee at Dublin on Wednesday, August 14, 1878. The Council have received Reports during the past year from the General Treasurer, and his account for the year will be laid before the General Committee this day. The following Resolution was referred by the General Committee at Plymouth to the Council for consideration, and for action, if it should seem desirable, viz. :— “That the question of the appointment of a Committee, consisting of Mr. F. J. Bramwell, Mr. J. F. Bateman, Mr. G. F. Deacon, Mr. Rogers Field, Captain Douglas Galton, Mr, R. B. Grantham, Mr. Baldwin Latham, Mr. C. W. Merrifield, and Mr. G. J. Symons, for carrying on Observations on the’ Rainfall of the British Isles, be referred to the Council for consideration, and action, if it seem desirable ; and that the sum of 150/. be placed at the disposal of the Council for the purpose.” The Council having considered the Resolution, and having placed themselves in communication with Mr. Symons, decided that it would not be desirable to appoint the proposed Committee, as, under the system or- ganised by Mr. Symons, the grant which had been made in former years by the Association could be discontinued without detriment to science. The General Committee adopted last year certain modifications of the Rules of the Association, which had for their object the exclusion of un- scientific or other unsuitable papers and discussions from the sectional proceedings of the Association : and the Council have, during the past year, further considered this question. The Council are of opinion that the existing Rules of the Association, with the additions hereto subjoined, will afford, if carried out in their in- tegrity, a sufficient guarantee for the exclusion of unscientific and un- suitable papers :— 1.—That the appointment of Sectional Presidents, Vice-Presidents, and Secretaries be made either a year in advance or at such early period as the Council may find practicable: 2.—That no paper received after the commencement of the Meeting shall be read, unless recommended by the Committee of the Section, after it has been referred and reported upon. At the Meeting of the Association held at Plymouth, invitations’ were laid before the General Committee, for the year 1879, from Swansea and from Nottingham. The invitation from the Mayor and Town Council of Nottingham to meet in that town in 1879 was accepted ; and it was understood that it would be preferable to defer the meeting at Swansea until 1880. REPORT OF THE COUNCIL. lvii In the course of the Autumn the Council received a communication from the Town Council of Nottingham, to the effect that it would not be convenient for them to receive the Association in 1879. The Mayor and Town Council of Sheffield have intimated to the Council that they are desirous of receiving the Association in 1879; and invitations from the Mayor and Town Council of Sheffield, and from the Scientific Bodies in that town, will be laid before the General Committee in due course. The invitation from Swansea for 1880, received last year, will be re- newed on the present occasion ; and it will be in the recollection of the General Committee that an invitation was received last year from York, proposing that the fiftieth anniversary of the Association be held in that city in 1881. In accordance with a recommendation made by the Committee of Section D. at Plymouth, and adopted by the General Committee, the “Rules for Zoological Nomenclature,’ drawn up in 1842 at the instance of the Association, have been reprinted and published. The following men of science, who have attended meetings of the Association, have been elected Corresponding Members :— Professor H. L. F. Helmholtz, Dr. Lindeman, Bremen. Berlin. Professor Moissonet, Paris. Dr. H. Kronecker, Berlin. M. Akin Karoly, Pesth. The Council have nominated the Duke of Abercorn, K.G., and the Earl of Enniskillen, F.R.S., as Vice-Presidents of the present Mecting;; - and they submit these nominations for confirmation by the Geueral Committee. The following are the names of the Members of Council for the past year, who, in accordance with the regulations, are not eligible for re-elec- tion this year, viz. :— Mr. De La Rue. Lord Houghton. Professor Maxwell. Colonel Grant. Professor H. J. S. Smith. The Council recommend the re-election of the ordinary Members of Council, with the addition of the gentlemen whose names are dis- tinguished by an asterisk in the following list :— Abel, F. A., Esq., F.R.S. *Lefevre, George Shaw, Esq., M.-P. *Adams, Prof. W. G., F.R.S. Maskelyne, Prof. N. S., F.R.S. Barlow, W. H., Esq., F.R.S. ‘| Newton, Prof. A., F.R.S. Bramwell, F. J., Esq., F.R.S. Ommanney, Adm. Sir E., F.R.S. Cayley, Prof., F.R.S. Pengelly, W., Esq., F.R.S. Evans, J., Esq., F.R.S. Prestwich, Prof. J., F.R.S. *EHvans, Captain, F.R.S. *Rayleigh, Lord, F.R.S. Farr, Dr. W., F.R.S. Rolleston, Prof., F.R.S. Foster, Prof. G.C., F.R.S. ~ Roscoe, Prof., F.R.S. Froude, W., Esq., F.R.S. Russell, Dr. W. J., F.R.S. *Glaisher, J. W. L., Esq., F.R.S. Sanderson, Prof. J. B., F.R.S. Heywood, J., Esq., F.R.S. Smyth, Warington W., Esq, Huggins, W., Hsq., F.R.S. E.R.S. lviil REPORT— 1878. The Council regret that pressing engagements compel Mr. Griffith to withdraw finally from the position of Assistant-General Secretary after: the present meeting of the Association, and take this opportunity of ex- pressing ‘their high estimation of the value of the services which Mr. Griffith has rendered to the Association during a period of sixteen years, and of the serious loss which his retirement will occasion to the Council and to the Association. Mr. Griffith remains an ex-officio Member of Council, as a former general officer, so that the Council trust they may still retain the benefit of his experience. In accordance with the Report of last year, the Council will propose to the General Committee that the post of Assistant Secretary be filled by the election of Mr. J. EH. H. Gordon. RECOMMENDATIONS ADOPTED BY THE GENERAL COMMITTEE AT THE Dusur Meeting in Avueust 1878. [When Committees are appointed, the Member first named is regarded as the Secretary, except there is a specific nomination. ] ~ Involving Grants of Money. That the Committee, consisting of Professor Cayley, Professor G. G. Stokes, Professor H. J. S. Smith, Professor Sir William Thomson, Mr. ‘James Glaisher, and Mr. J. W. L. Glaisher (Secretary), be reappointed ; and that the sum of 150J. be placed at their disposal for the purpose of calculating Factor Tables of the fifth and sixth millions. That a Committee, consisting of Professor Sylvester (Secretary) and Professor Cayley, be appointed for the purpose of calculating Tables of the Fundamental Invariants of Algebraic Forms; and that the sum of 501. be placed at their disposal for the purpose. That the Committee, consisting of Professor G Forbes (Secretary), Professor Sir William Thomson, and Professor J. D. Everett, for the pur- pose of making certain observations in India, and observations on Atmos- pheric Electricity at Madeira, be reappointed; and that the grant of 151. that has lapsed be renewed. That the Rey. Dr. Haughton and Mr. B. Williamson be a Committee for the calculation of Tables of Sun-heat Coefficients; that Mr. B. Williamson be the Secretary, and that the sum of 301. be placed at their disposal for the purpose. That the Committee, consisting of Dr. Joule (Secretary), Professor Sir William Thomson, Professor Tait, Professor Balfour Stewart, and Professor J. Clerk Maxwell, for effecting the Determination of the Me- chanical Equivalent of Heat be reappointed ; and that the grant of 65. that has lapsed be renewed. That a Committee, consisting of Professor G. Forbes (Secretary), Professor W. G. Adams, and Mr. W. E. Ayrton, be appointed for the pur- pose of improving an instrument for detecting the presence of Fire-damp in Mines ; and that the sum of 301. be placed at their disposal for the purpose. That Mr. W. E. Ayrton (Secretary), Dr. O. J. Lodge, and Mr, J. HE. H. Gordon be appointed 1 Committee for accurately measuring the specific RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GENERAL COMMITTEE. lix inductive capacity of a good Sprengel Vacuum; and that the sum of 40/. be placed at their disposal for the purpose. That the Committee, consisting of Mr. James Glaisher (Secretary), Mr. R. P. Greg, Mr. Charles Brooke, Dr. Flight, and Professor A.S. Herschel, on Luminous Meteors be reappointed ; and that the sum of 201. be placed at their disposal. That a Committee, consisting of Mr. David Gill (Secretary), Professor G. Forbes, Mr. Howard Grubb, and Mr. C. H. Gimingham (with power to add to their number), be appointed to consider the question of im- provements in Astronomical Clocks ; and that the sum of 301. be placed at their disposal for the purpose. That Mr. W. Chandler Roberts, Dr. C. R. A. Wright, and Mr. A. P. Luff be a Committee for the purpose of investigating the Chemical Com- position and Structure of some of the less-known Alkaloids; that Dr. Wright be the Secretary, and that the sum of 251. be placed at their dis- posal for the purpose. That Dr. Wallace, Professor Dittmarr, and Mr. T. Wills be a Com- mittee for the purpose of reporting on the best means for the development of Light from Coal-gas of different qualities; that Mr. Wills be the Sec- retary, and that the sum of 10/. be placed at their disposal for the pur- ose. That Professor W. G. Adams, Mr. John M. Thomson, Mr. W. N. Hartley, and Mr. James T. Bottomley be a Committee for the purpose of investigating the law of the ‘“ Electrolysis of mixed metallic solutions and solutions of compound salts ;” that Mr. John M. Thomson be the Secretary, and that the sum of 25]. be placed at their disposal for the purpose. That Mr. John Evans, Sir John Lubbock, Major-General Lane Fox, Mr. George Busk, Professor Boyd Dawkins, Mr. Pengelly, and Mr. A. W. Franks be a Committee for the purpose of exploring Caves in Borneo ; that Mr. Evans be the Secretary, and that the sum of 50/. be placed at their disposal for the purpose. That Professor Hull, the Rev. H. W. Crosskey, Captain D. Galton, Mr. Glaisher, Mr. G. A. Lebour, Mr. W. Molyneux, Mr. Morton, Mr. Pengelly, Professor Prestwich, Mr. Plant, Mr. Mellard Reade, Mr. Roberts, Mr. W. Whitaker, and Mr. De Rance be a Committee for the purpose of investi- gating the Circulation of the Underground Waters in the Permian, New Red Sandstone, and Jurassic Formations of England, and the Quantity and Character of the Water supplied to towns and districts from those forma- tions ; that Mr. De Rance be the Secretary, and that the sum of 15/. be placed at their disposal for the purpose. That Mr. Godwin-Austen, Professor Prestwich, Mr. Davidson, Mr. _ Etheridge, Mr. Willett, and Mr. Topley be a Committee for the purpose of assisting the Kentish Boring Exploration; that Mr. Willett and Mr. Topley be the Secretaries, and that the sum of 1001. be placed at their disposal for the purpose. - That Dr. J. Evans, Sir John Lubbock, Mr. E. Vivian, Mr. W. Pengelly, Mr. G. Busk, Professor W. B. Dawkins, Mr. W. A. Sandford, and Mr. J. H. Lee be a Committee for the purpose of continuing the Ex- ploration of Kent’s Cavern, Torquay ; that Mr. Pengelly be the Secretary, and that the sum of 1001. be placed at their disposal for the purpose. That Dr. J. Evans, the Rev. T. G. Bonney, Mr. W. Carruthers, Mr. F. Drew, Mr. R. Etheridge, jun., Mr. G. A. Lebour, Professor L. C. Miall, Professor H. A. Nicholson, Mr. F. W. Rudler, Mr. HE. B. Tawney, Mr. W. lx REPORT—1878. Topley, and Mr. W. Whitaker be a Committee for the purpose of carry- ing on the Geological Record ; that Mr. Whitaker be the Secretary, and ‘that the sum of 100/. be placed at their disposal for the purpose. That the Rev. Dr. Haughton, Professor Leith Adams, Professor Barrett, Mr. Hardman, and Dr. Macalister be a Committee for the pur- ’ pose of exploring the Fermanagh Caves; that Dr. Macalister be the Sec- retary, and that the sum of 5/. be placed at their disposal for the purpose. That the Rev. Maxwell Close, Professor W. C. Williamson, and Mr. W. H. Baily be a Committee for the purpose of collecting and reporting on the Tertiary (Miocene) Flora, &c., of the Basalt of the North of Treland ; that Mr. W. H. Baily be the Secretary, and that the sum of 201. be placed at their disposal for the purpose. That Mr. Spence Bate and Mr. J. Brooking Rowe be a Committee for the purpose of exploring the Marine Zoology of South Devon; that Mr. Spence Bate be the Secretary, and that the sum of 20/. be placed at their disposal for the purpose. That Mr. Stainton, Sir J. Lubbock, and Mr. E. C. Rye be reappointed a Committee for the purpose of continuing a Record of Zoological Litera- ture ; that Mr. Stainton be the Secretary, and that the sum of 100/. be placed at their disposal for the purpose. That Dr. M. Foster, Professor Rolleston, Mr. Dew-Smith, Professor Huxley, Dr. Carpenter, Dr. Gwyn Jeffreys, Mr. Sclater, Mr. F. M. Bal- four, Sir C. Wyville Thomson, and Professor Ray Lankester be reappointed a Committee for the purpose of arranging with Dr. Dohrn for the occupa- tion of a table at the Zoological Station at Naples during the ensuing year ; that Mr. Dew-Smith be the Secretary, and that the sum of 75/. be placed at their disposal for the purpose. That Sir Victor Brooke, Professor Flower, and Mr. Sclater be a Com- mittee for the purpose of assisting Professor Leith Adams in preparing Plates illustrating a Monograph on the Mammoth; that Sir Victor Brooke be the Secretary, and that the sum of 17/. be placed at their dis- posal for the purpose. That Mr. Sclater, Dr. G. Hartlaub, Sir Joseph Hooker, Captain J. W. Hunter, and Professor Flower be a Committee for the purpose of taking steps for the investigation of the Natural History of Socotra; that Mr. ‘Sclater be the Secretary, and that the sum of 100/. be placed at their dis- posal for the purpose. That Professor Rolleston, Major-General Lane Fox, Dr. John Evans, Professor Boyd Dawkins, and Mr. Edward Laws be a Committee for the purpose of exploring certain Bone Caves in South Wales; that Professor Rolleston be the Secretary, and that the sum of 50/. be placed at their disposal for the purpose. That Major-General Lane Fox, Professor Rolleston, and Mr. F. G. H. Price be a Committee for the purpose of exploring Ancient Earthworks ; that Major-General Lane Fox be the Secretary, and that the sum of 25/. be placed at their disposal for the purpose. That Major-General Lane Fox, Mr. William James Knowles, Dr. Leith Adams, and the Rev. Dr. Grainger be a Committee for the purpose of con- ducting Excavations at Portstewart and elsewhere in the North of Ireland; that Mr. Knowles be the Secretary, and that the sum of 15/. be placed at their disposal for the purpose. That Dr. Farr, Dr. Beddoe, Mr. Brabrook, Sir George Campbell, Mr. F. P. Fellows, Major-General Lane Fox, Mr. Francis Galton, Mr. Park RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GENERAL COMMITTEE. lxi Harrison, Mr. James Heywood, Mr. P. Hallett, Professor Leone Levi, Sir Rawson Rawson, Professor Rolleston, and Mr. Charles Roberts be a Com- mittee for the purpose of continuing the collection of observations on the Systematic Examination of Heights, Weights, &c., of Human Beings in the British Empire, and the publication of photographs of the typical Races of the Empire ; that Mr. E. W. Brabrook be the Secretary, and that the sum of 50/. be placed at their disposal for the purpose. That the Committee, consisting of Professor Sir William Thomson, Major-General Strachey, Captain Douglas Galton, Mr. G. F. Deacon, Mr. Rogers Field, Mr. E. Roberts, and Mr. J. N. Shoolbred, be reappointed for the purpose of considering the Datum-level of the Ordnance Survey of Great Britain, with a view to its establishment ona surer foundation than hitherto, and for the tabulation and comparison of other Datum-marks ; that Mr. James N. Shoolbred be the Secretary, and that the sum of 104. be placed at their disposal for the purpose. That the Committee on Instruments for Measuring the Speed of Ships, consisting of Mr. W. Froude, Mr. F. J. Bramwell, Mr. A. E. Fletcher, the Rev. E. L. Berthon, Mr. James R. Napier, Mr. C. W. Merrifield, Dr. C. W. Siemens, Mr. H. M. Brunel, Mr. J. N. Shoolbred, Professor: James Thomson, and Professor Sir William Thomson, be reappointed ; that Mr. James N. Shoolbred be the Secretary, and that the sum of 500. be placed at their disposal for the purpose. That the Committee, consisting of Mr. James R. Napier, Sir William Thomson, Mr. William Froude, Professor Osborne Reynolds, and Mr. J. T. Bottomley, for the purpose of making experiments and of reporting on the effect of the Propeller on the turning of Steam-vessels be reappointed (with power to communicate with the Government) ; that Professor Osborne Reynolds be the Secretary, and that the sum of 100. be placed at their dis- posal for the purpose. That the Committee, consisting of Professor Sir William Thomson, Dr. Merrifield, Mr. W. Froude, Professor Osborne Reynolds, Captain Douglas Galton, and Mr. James N. Shoolbred (with power to add to their number), be reappointed for the purpose of obtaining information respect- ing the Phenomena of the stationary Tides in the English Channel and in the North Sea, and of representing to the Government of Portugal and the Governor of Madeira that in the opinion of the British Association tidal observations at Madeira or other islands in the North Atlantic Ocean would be very valuable, with the view to the advancement of our knowledge of the tides in the Atlantic Ocean; that Mr. James N. Shool- bred be the Secretary, and that the sum of 10/7. be placed at their disposal: for the purpose. Applications for Reports and Researches not involving Grants of Money. That the Committee, consisting of Professor Sir William Thomson: (Secretary), Professor Clerk Maxwell, Professor Tait, Dr. C. W. Siemens, Mr. F. J. Bramwell, Mr. W. Froude, and Mr. J. T. Bottomley, for continu- ing secular experiments upon the Elasticity of Wires be reappointed. That the Committee, consisting of Dr. W. Huggins (Secretary), Mr. J.N. Lockyer, Professor J. Emerson Reynolds, Mr. G. J. Stoney, Mr. W. Spottiswoode, Dr. De La Rue, and Dr. W. M. Watts, for the purpose of preparing and printing Tables of Oscillation-frequencies be reappointed. That the Committee, consisting of Professor Everett (Secretary),. . Ixii REPORT—1878. Professor Sir William Thomson, Professor J. Clerk Maxwell, Mr. G. J. Symons, Professor Ramsay, Professor Geikie, Mr. J. Glaisher, Mr. Pen- gelly, Professor Kdward Hull, Professor Ansted, Dr. Clement Le Neve Foster, Professor A. S. Herschel, Mr. G. A. Lebour, Mr. A. B. Wynne, Mr. Galloway, Mr. Joseph Dickinson, and Mr, G. F. Deacon, on Under- ground Temperature be reappointed. That the Committee consisting of Professor G. C. Foster, Professor W. G. Adams, Professor R. B. Clifton, Professor Cayley, Professor J. D. Everett, Professor Clerk Maxwell, Lord Rayleigh, Professor G. G. Stokes, Professor Balfour Stewart, Mr. Spottiswoode, and Professor P. G. Tait be reappointed, for the purpose of endeavouring to procure Reports on the progress of the chief branches of Mathematics and Physics; and that Professor G. Carey Foster be the Secretary. That Mr. C. W. Merrifield be requested to report on the present state of knowledge of the Application of Quadratures and Interpolation to Actual Data. That the Committee, consisting of Mr. Spottiswoode, Professor G. G. Stokes, Professor Cayley, Professor H. J. S. Smith, Professor Sir William Thomson, Professor Henrici, Lord Rayleigh, and Mr. J. W. L. Glaisher (Secretary), on Mathematical Notation and Printing be reappointed. That the Committee, consisting of Professor Sir William Thomson (Secretary), Professor Tait, Professor Grant, Dr. Siemens, Professor Purser, Professor G. Forbes, and Mr. David Gill, for the Measurement of the Lunar Disturbance of Gravity be reappointed. That a Committee, consisting of Captain Abney (Secretary), Pro- fessor W. G. Adams, and Professor G. C. Foster, be appointed to carry out an investigation for the purpose of fixing a Standard of White Light. That Professor A. S. Herschel, Mr. J.T. Dunn, and Mr. G. A. Lebour be reappointed a Committee for the purpose of making experiments on the Thermal Conductivities of certain rocks; and that Professor Herschel be the Secretary. That Mr. R. J. Moss, Professor Boyd Dawkins, Professor Hull, Dr. Moss, R.N., Mr. Pengelly, Dr. Leith Adams, Professor O’Reilly, and Mr. John Evans be a Committee for the purpose of obtaining information with regard to the mode of occurrence of the remains of Cervus Megaceros in Ireland; and that Mr. R. J. Moss be the Secretary. That Professor Prestwich, Professor Harkness, Professor Hughes, Professor W. Boyd Dawkins, the Rev. H.W. Crosskey, Professor L.C. Miall, Messrs. G. H. Morton, D. Mackintosh, R. H. Tiddeman, J. E. Lee, J. Plant, W. Pengelly, Dr. Deane, Mr. C. J. Woodward, and Mr. Moly- neux be a Committee for the purpose of recording the position, height above the sea, lithological characters, size, and origin of the Erratic Blocks of England, Wales, and Ireland, reporting other matters of interest connected with the same, and taking measures for their preservation ; and that the Rev. H. W. Crosskey be the Secretary. That Mr. C. Spence Bate be requested to continue his Report “ On the present state of our knowledge of the Crustacea.” That Sir George Campbell, M.P., Lord O’ Hagan, Mr. Morley, M.P., Mr. Chadwick, M.P., Mr. Shaw Lefevre, M.P. Mr. Heywood, Mr. Hallett, Professor Jevons, Dr. Farr, Mr. Stephen Bourne, Mr. Hammick, Professor Leone Levi, Professor J. K. Ingram, Dr. Hancock, and Mr. J. T. Pim (with power to add to their number) be a Committee to continue the researches into the Incidence of Direct Taxation, with special reference to RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GENERAL COMMITTED. lxiii Probate, Legacy, and Succession Duty, and the Assessed Taxes; and that Dr. Hancock be the Secretary. That the Committee consisting of Dr. A. W. Williamson, Professor Sir William Thomson, Mr. Bramwell, Mr. St. John Vincent Day, Dr. C. W. Siemens, Mr. C. W. Merrifield, Dr. Neilson Hancock, Professor Abel, Mr. J. R. Napier, Captain Douglas Galton, Mr. Newmarch, Mr. E. H. Carbutt, Mr. Macrory, and Mr. H. Trueman Wood be reappointed, for the purpose of watching and reporting to the Council on Patent Legis- lation ; and that Mr. F. J. Bramwell be the Secretary. Communications ordered to be printed in extenso in the Annual Report of the Association. That Dr. Dobson’s paper ‘‘On the Geographical Distribution of the Chiroptera” be printed in eatenso among the Reports. That the paper by Mr. Bindon B. Stoney, on “Recent Improvements in the Port of Dublin,” be printed in extenso among the Reports, with such plans and diagrams as may be deemed necessary by the Council. Resolutions referred to the Council for consideration and action of it seem ; desirable. That the attention of the Council of the Association be called to the fact that the recommendations of the Royal Commission on Science have been altogether disregarded in the Act lately passed to enable the Trustees of the British Museum to remove the Natural History Collection to South Kensington, and that the Council be requested to take such steps in the matter as they shall think most desirable in the interests of science. That the question of the reappointment of the Committee, consisting of the Rev. H. F. Barnes, Mr. Spence Bate, Mr. H. E. Dresser ( Secretary), Mr. J. EH. Harting, Dr. Gwyn Jeffreys, Professor Newton, the Rey. Canon Tristram, and Mr. G. Shaw Lefevre, for the purpose of inquiring into the possibility of establishing a “ close time,” for the protection of indigenous animals, be referred to the Council for consideration ; and that the Council be empowered to take such steps in the matter as they shall think most desirable in the interests of science, That the question of the appointment of a Committee, consisting of Mr. James Dillon, Mr. Edward Easton, Mr. P. Le Neve Foster, Captain Douglas Galton, Mr. T. Hawksley, Sir John Hawkshaw, Professor Hull, Mr. Robert Manning, Professor Prestwich, Professor Ramsay, Mr. C. E. De Rance, the Earl of Rosse, Mr. W. Shelford, Mr. J. N. Shoolbred, Mr. John Smyth, jun., Mr. G. J. Symons, and Mr. A. T. Atchison (Secretary), for the purpose of conferring with the Council as to the advisability of urging Government to take immediate action to pro- cure unity of control of each of our principal river basins, be referred to the Council for consideration and action if it seem desirable. lxvi REPORT—1878. Synopsis of Grants of Money appropriated to Scientific Purposes by the General Committee at the Dublin Meeting in August 1878. The Names of the Members who would be entitled to call on the General Treasurer for the respective Grants wre pre- Jiwed. Mathematics and Physics. *Cayley, Prof.—Calculation of Factor Tables for the Fifth £ Ree REM AVLTNITOTIN ts. ah pect eee end settee e «a +a EERE ee see 150 Sylvester, Prof.— Tables of Fundamental Invariants of Algebraic Wormish ce .bh: secckcasbece.d. o0s6 eee see hun Pee teeeee 50 *Forbes, Prof. G.—Observation of Atmospheric Electricity at: Madeira (renewed ji! 4.3202 sess 2:42 t rae sacewate eet eens Hanghton, Rev. Prof.—Tables of Sun-heat Co-efficients ... 30 *Joule, Dr.—Determination of the Mechanical Equivalent of edb renewed)! 0230 ee hceee pee eicce the ernc eee ae dase Sh. 65 Forbes, Prof. G.—Instrument for Detecting the Presence of Mire-dasnp in. Mines. .:. sa) Besestme gash? critsk Poe cate ceek epee 30 Ayrton, Mr. W. E.—Specific Inductive Capacity of a good Sprengel WV acum ..i.0: Maesteg eve ageteeloss beste s cscaes perce 40 Glaisher, Mr.—Luminous Meteors ................0. 20 eeeceecee ees 20 Gill, Mr. D.—Improvements in Astronomical Clocks.......... 30 Chemistry. *Roberts, Mr. Chandler.—Composition and Structure of some Of the Jessen wa eA RAIOIds oo. cess: cocnthpne-kpane ns cinmesies 25 *Wallace, Dr.—Development of Light from Coal-Gas of differemb Ommlitves io. arecle <:4e-winwceepme resis ~aeb EARS PemeeeNe eh 10 Adams, Prof. W. G.—Electrolysis of Metallic Solutions and Solutions of Compound Salts .............::csceeseeeececeeees 25 Evans, Dr. J.—Exploration of Caves in Borneo ............. a OU *Hull, Prof—Circulation of Underground Waters _............ 15 *Godwin-Austen, Mr.—Kentish Boring Exploration (re- MEW) 112. 2:civas «bebe he » afennbios beestyl-ekiw inh )layitettap «'sniwen eaten » 100 *Evans, Dr. J—Kent’s Cavern Exploration ..................++. 100 *Byvans, Dr. J.—Record of the Progress of Geology ..........., 100 *Haughton, Rev. Dr.—Fermanagh Caves Exploration ........, 5 - Close, Rev. Maxwell.—Miocene Flora of the Basalt of the North of Mrelancl cere cent -eueee so eeatirese reese cicisi>-lsigeteree Carried forward. .......s00 +0 seesee- Eizencises sceeedieneme 880 * Reappointed. (=) co] SYNOPSIS OF GRANTS OF MONEY. lxv Biology. £ 2. d. TG LORWET {EER ee. «oti ied cutee con segiede nasal’ 880 0 0 Bate, Mr. Spence C.—Marine Zoology of South Devon ...... 20 0 0 *Stainton, Mr.—Record of Zoological Literature ............... 100 0 0 *Foster, Dr. M.—Table at the Zoological Station, Naples ... 75 0 0 Brooke, Sir Victor, Bart.—TIllustrations for a Monograph on RMU ATT LEG St FS rename mee nese 2 ge hath ig wae ma gna cade Seine vais LA. “0 Sclater, Mr.—Natural History of Socotra ..............-:0+:0e LOGO" 0 *Rolleston, Prof.—Exploration of Bone-caves in South Wales i aE ly FOO WEG) 6... ida Meee nctbnaeidatsowcaiededaeaes 50 0 0 *Fox, General Lane.—Exploration of Ancient Earthworks ... 25 0 0 Fox, General Lane.—Excavation at Portstewart and else- where in the North of Ireland ...................2eeeeceneoe ees GeO) 0) Statistics and Hconomic Science. *Farr, Dr.—Anthropometric Committee ................46060eeee 50 0 O Mechanics. *Thomson, Sir W.—Datum-level of the Ordnance Survey .. 10 0 0 *Froude, Mr. W.—Instruments for measuring the Speed of ETS CLP) RAR ne er ER aOueOs (0 *Napier, Mr. J. R.—Steering of Screw Steamers ............... Or OO *Thomson, Sir W.—Tidal Observations in the English TEED Tih GEES alae ir ae ee ic mer ape a eerie Ca 10-0 0 £1412 0 0 * Reappointed. The Annual Meeting in 1879. The Meeting at Sheffield will commence on Wednesday, August 20, 1879. Place of Meeting in 1880. The Annual Meeting of the Association in 1880 will be held at Swansea. 1878. d lxvi REPORT—1878. General Statement of Sums which have been paid on Account of Grants for Scientific Purposes. SS ates 1834. Tide Discussions .........+0+++- 20 0 0 1835. Tide Discussions ............0+ 62 0 0 British Fossil Ichthyology ... 105 0 0 £167 0 0 1836. i Tide Discussions .........se006+ 163 0 O British Fossil Ichthyology ... 105 0 0 Thermometric Observations, CUCY alm tiers suicatinekiacfvnainesintenne ©. 50 0 O Experiments on long-con- tinued Heat: ne sucenseonyeos 10 0 0 Underground Waters ......... 10 0 0 Earthquakes in Scotland...... 110 0 Zoological Record........s..0+0+ 100 0 O WlOse TIME... ...sweduevespe's eee 5 0 0 Physiological Actionof Sound 25 0 0 Zoological Station......... “hope 75 0 0 Intestinal Secretions ......... 15 0 0 Physical Characters of Inha- bitants of British Isles...... 13 15 O Measuring Speed of Ships ... 10 0 0 Effect of Propeller on turning of Steam Vessels ...........- 5 0 O £1092 4 2 1877. Liquid Carbonic Acids in Mamerals ioe aasvcnees se scr esrcsas 20 0 0 Elliptic Functions ...,........ 250 0 0 Thermal Conductivity of ROCKS teceenenenecasnescsseesss se. AG ari Zoological Record...........se06 100 0 0 va REPORT—1 878. cS ER Kent’s Cavern ...cssecsseseceees 100 0 0 Zoological Station at Naples 75 0 0 Luminous Meteors ....... «ee 30 0 O Elasticity of Wires .........+- 100 0 0 Dipterocarpz, Report on...... 20 0 0 Mechanical Equivalent of TH Gaitda)s-e decisis tenes eeeeeeeiatte 35 0 0 Double Compounds of Cobalt and Nickel ...;csssserswsenes SO. 0 Underground Temperatures 50 0 0 Settle Cave Explanation...... 100 0 0 Underground Waters in New Red Sandstone ........ ss. 10 0 0 Action of Ethyl Bromobuty- rate on Ethyl Sodaceto- ACetAtC s.r cecssceesecsees idee PLOMO IRD British Earthworks ...........- 25 0 0 Atmospheric Elasticity in TGA i... cawwaccuseeeeunesede des / 16 00 Development of Light from Coal=2AS ...eecseseessecsnccsesss 20 0 0 Estimation of Potash and Phosphoric Acid.......0+ses0e. 118 0 Geological Record..........++ -« 100700 Anthropometric Committee 34 0 0 Physiological Action of Phos- phoric Acid, &e......... isstvee 15 0 0 £1128 9 7 1878. Exploration of Settle Caves 100 0 0 Geological Record........++0+++ 100 0 0 Investigation of Pulse Pheno- mena by means of Syphon ReECOLGEL ...00..0.cccrsceocsscees 10 0 0 Zoological Station at Naples 75 0 0 Investigation of Underground Watters........crcccceceseensee cnn 15 0 0 Transmission of Electrical Impulses through Nerve Structure........ccccccecssrssers 30 0 0 Calculation of Factor Table of Fourth Million....... osvee At 00)),0) 0 Anthropometric Committee... 66 0 0 Chemical Composition and Structure of less known Alkaloids.........00+-seesscereee 25 0 0 Exploration of Kent’s Cavern 50 0 0 Zoological Record ....... sesensss 100 (0, 0 Fermanagh CavesExploration 15 0 0 Thermal Conductivity of ROCKS denies .ccrcessu eh poncesies aann 416 6 | Luminous Meteors..........0++e+ 10 0 0 Ancient Earthworks ............ 25 0 0 £725 16 6 GENERAL MEETINGS. lxxv General Meetings. On Wednesday, August 14, at 8 p.m, in the Exhibition Palace, Professor Allen Thomson, M.D., LL.D., F.R.S., President, resigned the office of President to William Spottiswoode, Esq., M.A., D.C.L., LL.D., F.R.S., who took the Chair, and delivered an Address, for which see page l. On Thursday, August 15, at 8 p.m., a Soirée took place at the Royal Dublin Society’s rooms. On Friday, August 16, at 8.30 p.m., in the Exhibition Palace, G. J. Romanes, Esq., F.L.S., delivered a Discourse on ‘‘ Animal Intelligence.” On Monday, August 19, at 8.30 p.m., in the Exhibition Palace, Professor Dewar, F.R.S., delivered a Discourse on “ Dissociation, or Modern Ideas of Chemical Action.” On Tuesday, August 20, at 8 p.m., a Soirée took place at the Royal Irish Academy. On Wednesday, August 21, the concluding General Meeting took place, when the Proceedings of the General Committee, and the Grants of Money for Scientific purposes, were explained to the Members. The Meeting was then adjourned to Sheffield.* * The Meeting is appointed to take place on Wednesday, August 20, 1879. rsa. aaa ‘ae Lo yay a ih dati han he 7 me vise th Sei f aA vida Lhd :. Bo hy Die Gye taos soak hy Mt fampn seni oor SKM ATT Ae meas atthe . are’ HS nC ry peti s dua toa csi ab ta "act ie fy he ay oer oc ITH, ba wel frites Meee rae Hoes 2 7 x7 Tat &t ae aval oly vine a ot nz His Ai "ik i? - yan at Sipe ast Bi otha aw BAO” fds Gor noreh Ged Birvaviis eee mb OE bn OF bu ome, ‘ Tih wecrupee ACT 4 Bowariiah po EW as Tan Ae ebiaaha ‘uttetcdlansatedy Yoon HGS ait Ge souhy alot et oer 16d. 3 ae Pies fs “it aah en , wa aM [rarest ‘Waibalgnos ant, A Fer wh senth autres 2 hh ate etd er rem belraniat) ont ‘Io .rRe fs : as TS eld od Dapiielys a erugar aneceprne oni itor Vd Fae, eae ‘pd sbesiisesan pues all fe | Paes oliTB) ORY naa, rhonbst me {Sad ols aie ' , i ae ADDRESS OF WILLIAM SPOTTISWOODE, Esa., Me. DOT, GbeDity .FB.8:54/., BRAS, 3 EBS: PRESIDENT, ON LOOKING BACK at the long array of distinguished men who both in this and in the sister countries have filled the chair of the British Association ; on considering also the increased pains which have been bestowed upon, and the increased importance attaching to, the Presidential Address ; it may well happen when, as on this occasion, your choice has fallen upon one outside the sphere of professional Science, that your nominee should feel unusual diffidence in accepting the post. Two considerations have however in my own case outweighed all reasons for hesitation: First, the uniform kindness which I received at the hands of the Association throughout the eight years during which I had the honour of holding another office; and, secondly, the conviction that the same goodwill which was accorded to your Treasurer would be extended to your Presi- dent. These considerations have led me to arrange my observations under two heads, viz., I propose first to offer some remarks upon the purposes and prospects of the Association with which, through your suffrages, I have been so long and so agreeably connected; and, secondly, to indulge in a few reflexions, not indeed upon the details or technical progress, but upon the external aspects and tendencies of the Science which on this occasion I have the hononr to represent. The former of these subjects is perhaps trite; but as an old man is allowed to become garrulous on his own hobby, so an old officer may be pardoned for lingering about a favourite theme. And althongh the latter may appear somewhat un- promising, I have decided to make it one of the topics of my discourse, from the consideration that the holder of this office will generally do better by giving utterance to what has already become part of his own thought, than by gathering matter outside of its habitual range for the special occasion. For, as it seems to me, the interest (if any) of an 1878. A 2 REPORT—1 878. address consists, not so much in the multitude of things therein brought forward, as in the individuality of the mode in which they are treated. The British Association has already entered its fifth decade. It has held its meetings, this the 48th, in twenty-eight different towns. In six cities of note, viz., York, Bristol, Newcastle-on-Tyne, Plymouth, Man- chester, and Belfast, its curve of progress may be said to have a node, or point through which it has twice passed; in the five Universities of Oxford, Cambridge, Dublin, Edinburgh, and Glasgow, and in the two great commercial centres, Liverpool and Birmingham, it may similarly be said to have a triple point, or one through which it has three times passed. Of our forty-six Presidents more than half (twenty-six, in fact) have passed away; while the remainder hold important posts in Science, and in the Public Service, or in other avocations not less honourable in themselves, nor less useful to the commonwealth. And whether it be due to the salu- brity of the climate or to the calm and dispassionate spirit in which Science is pursued by its votaries here, I do not pretend to say; but it is a fact that the earliest of our ex-Presidents still living, himself one of the original members of the Association, is a native of and resident in this country. At both of our former meetings held in Dublin, in 1835 and 1857 respectively, while greatly indebted to the liberal hospitality of the citi- zens at large, we were, as we now are, under especial obligations to the authorities of Trinity College for placing at our disposal buildings, not only unusually spacious and convenient in themselves, but full of remini- scences calculated to awake the scientific sympathies of all who may be gathered in them. At both of those former Dublin meetings the vene- rable name of Lloyd figured at our head ; and if long-established custom had not seemed to preclude it, I could on many accounts have wished that we had met for a third time under the same name. And although other distinguished men, such as Dr. Robinson, Professors Stokes, Tyn- dall, and Andrews, are similarly disqualified by having already passed the Presidential chair, while others again, such as Sir W. R. Hamilton, Dr. M‘Cullagh, and Professor Jukes, are permanently lost to our ranks ; still we should not have had far to seek, had we looked for a President in this fertile island itself. But as every one connected with the place of meet- ing partakes of the character of host towards ourselves as guests, it has been thought by our oldest and most experienced members that we should better respond to an invitation by bringing with us a President to speak as our representative than by seeking one on the spot; and we may always hope on subsequent occasions that some of our present hosts may respond to a similar call. But leaving our past history, which will form a theme more appro- priate to our jubilee meeting in 1881, at the ancient city of York, I will ask your attention to a few particulars of our actual operations. Time was when the Royal Societies of London and Edinburgh and the Royal Irish Academy were the only representative bodies of ADDRESS. 3 British Science and the only receptacles of memoirs relating thereto. But latterly, the division of labour, so general in industrial life, has operated in giving rise to special Societies, such as the Astronomical, the Linnean, the Chemical, the Geological, the Geographical, the Statistical, the Mathematical, the Physical, and many others. To both the earlier, or more general, and the later or more special societies alike, the British Association shows resemblance and affinity. We are general in our com- prehensiveness ; we are special in our sectional arrangement ; and in this respect we offer not only a counterpart, but to some extent a counterpoise, to the general tendency to sub-division in Science. Further still, while maintaining in their integrity all the elements of a strictly scientific body, we also include, in our character of a microcosm, and under our more social aspect, a certain freedom of treatment, and interaction of our various branches, which is scarcely possible among separate and inde- pendent societies. The general business of our meetings consists, first, in receiving and discussing communications upon scientific subjects at the various sections into which our body is divided, with discussions thereon; secondly, in distributing, under the advice of our Committee of Recommendations, the funds arising from the subscriptions of members and associates ; and thirdly, in electing a Council upon whom devolves the conduct of our affairs until the next meeting. The communications to the sections are of two kinds, viz., papers from individuals, and reports from Committees. As to the subject-matter of the papers, nothing which falls within the range of Natural Knowledge, as partitioned among our sections, can be considered foreign to the purposes of the Association ; and even many applications of Science, when viewed in reference to their scientific basis, may properly find a place in our proceedings. So numerous, however, are the topics herein comprised, so easy the transition heyond these limits, that it has been thought necessary to confine ourselves strictly within this range, lest the introduction of other matters, however interesting to indivi- dual members, should lead to the sacrifice of more important subjects. As to the form of the cotmmunications, while it is quite true that every scientific conclusion should be based upon substantial evidence, every theory com- plete before being submitted for final adoption, it 1s not the less desirable that even tentative conclusions and hypothetical principles when supported by sufficient prima facie evidence, and enunciated in such a manner as to be clearly apprehended, should find room for discussion at our sectional meetings. Considering, however, our limitations of time, and the varied nature of our audience, it would seem not inappropriate to suspend, mentally if not materially, over the doors of our section rooms, the Frenchman’s dictum, that no scientific theory ‘can be considered complete until it is so clear that it can be explained to the first man you meet in the street.’ A2 4 REPORT—1278. Among the communications to the Sections, undoubtedly the most important, as a rule, are the Reports; that is to say, documents issuing from specially appointed committees, some of which have been recipients of the grants mentioned above. These Reports are in the main of two kinds, first, accounts of observations carried on for a series of years, and intended as records of information on the special subjects; such for instance have been those made by the Kew Committee, by the committees on Luminous Meteors, on British Rainfall, on the Speed of Steamships, on Underground Temperature, on the Exploration of certain Geological Caverns, &c. These investigations, frequently originating in the energy and special qualifications of an individual, but conducted under the con- trol of a Committee, have in many cases been continued from year to year, until either the object has been fully attained, or the matter has passed into the hands of other bodies, which have thus been led to recognise an inquiry into these subjects as part and parcel of their appro- priate functions. The second class is one which is perhaps even more peculiar to the Association; viz., the Reports on the progress and present state of some main topics of Science. Among these may be instanced the early Reports on Astronomy, on Optics, on the Progress of Analysis; and later, those on Hlectrical Resistance, and on Tides; that of Professor G. G. Stokes on Double Refraction; that of Professor H. J. Smith on the Theory of Numbers; that of Mr. Russell on Hyperelliptic Transcendents ; and others. On this head Professor Carey Foster, in his address to the Mathematical and Physical Section at our meeting last year, made some excellent recommendations, to which. however, I need not at present more particularly refer, as the result of them will be duly laid before the section in the form of the report from a Committee to whom they were referred. It will be sufficient here to add that the wide extension of the Sciences in almost every branch, and the consequent specialisation of the studies of each individual, have rendered the need for such reports more than ever pressing ; and if the course of true Science should still run smooth it is probable that the need will increase rather than diminish. Tf time and space had permitted, I should have further particularised the Committees, occasionally appointed, on subjects connected with edu- cation. But IT must leave this theme for some future President, and content myself with pointing out that the British Association alone among scientific societies concerns itself directly with these questions, and is open to appeals for counsel and support from the great teaching body of the country. One of the principal methods by which this Association materially promotes the advancement of Science, and consequently one of its most important fanctions, consists in grants of money from its own income in aid of special scientific researches, The total amount so laid out during the forty-seven years of our existence has been no less than 44,0001. ; and the average during the last ten years has been 1,450]. per annum. These ADDRESS. 5 sums have not only been in the main wisely voted and usefully expended ; but they have been themselves productive of much additional voluntary expenditure of both time and money on the part of those to whom the grants have been entrusted. ‘The results have come back to the Associa- tion in the form of papers and reports, many of which have been printed in our volumes. By this appropriation of a large portion of its funds, the Association has to some extent anticipated, nay even it may have partly inspired the ideas, now so much discussed, ot the Endowment of Research. And whether the aspirations of those who advocate such endowment be ever fully realised or not, there can 1 think be no doubt whatever that the Association in the matter of these grants has afforded a most powerful stimulus to original research and discovery. Regarded from another point of view these grants, together with others to be hereafter mentioned, present a strong similarity to that use- ful institution, the Protessoriate Hxtraordimary of Germany, to which there are no foundations exactly corresponding in this country. For, beside their more direct educational purpose, these Professorships are intended, like our own grants, to afford to special individuals an oppor- tunity of following ont the special work for which they have previously proved themselves competent. And in this respect the British Associa- tion may be regarded as supplying, to the extent of its means, an elasticity which is wanting in our own Universities. Besides the funds which through your support are at the disposal of the British Association there are, as is well known to many here present, other funds of more or less similar character, at the disposal or subject to the recommendations of the Royal Society. There is the Donation Fund, the property of the Society ; the Government Grant of 1,000/. per annum, administered by the Society ; and the Government Fund of 4,0001. per annum (an experiment for five years) to be distributed by the Science and Art Department, both tor research itself, and for the support of those engaged thereon, according to the recommendations of a Committee consisting mainly of Fellows of the Royal Society. To these mght be added other funds in the hands of different Scientific Societies. But although it must be admitted that the purposes of these various funds are not to be distinguished by any very simple line of demarcation, and that they may theretore occasionally appear to overlap one another, it may still, 1 think, be fairly maintainea that this fact does not furnish any sufficient reason against their co-existence. There are many topics of research too minute in their range, too tentative in their present con- dition, to come fairly within the scope of the funds administered by the Royal Society. There are others, ample enough in their extent, and long enough in their necessary duration, to claim for their support a national grant, but which need to be actually set on foot or tried before they can fairly expect the recognition either of the public or of the Government. To these categories others might be added ; but the above-mentioned 6 REPORT—1878. instances will perhaps suffice to show that even if larger and more perma- nent funds were devoted to the promotion of research than is the case at present, there would still be a field of activity open to the British Asso- ciation as well as to other scientific bodies which may have funds at their disposal. On the general question it is not difficult to offer strong arguments in favour of permanent national Scientific Institutions ; nor is it difficult to . picture to the mind an ideal future when Science and Art shall walk hand in hand together, led by a willing minister into the green pastures of the Endowment of Research. But while allowing this to be no impossible a future, we must still admit that there are other and less promising possi-~ bilities, which under existing circumstances cannot be altogether left out of our calculations. Jam therefore on the whole inclined to think that, while not losing sight of larger schemes, the wisest policy, for the present at all events, and pending the experiment of the Government fund, will be to confine our efforts to a careful selection of definite persons to carry out de- finite pieces of work; leaving to them the honour (or the onus if they sothink it) of justifying from time to time a continuation of the confidence which the Government or other supporting body may have once placed in them. Passing from the proceedings to other features and functions of our body, it should be remembered that the continued existence of the Asso- ciation must depend largely upon the support which it receives from its members and associates. Stinted in the funds so arising, its scientific effec- tiveness would be materially impaired ; and deprived of them, its existence would be precarious. The amount at our disposal in each year will naturally vary with the population, with the accessibility, and with other cireum- stances of the place of meeting; there will be financially, as well as scientifically, good years and bad years. But we have in our invested capital a sum sufficient to tide over all probable fluctuations, and even to carry us efficiently through several years of financial famine, if ever such should occur. This seems to me sufficient; and we have therefore, I think, no need to increase our reserve, beyond perhaps the moderate addition which a prudent treasurer will always try to secure, against expenditure which often increases and rarely diminishes. But however important this material support may be to our existence and well being, it is by no means all that is required. There is another factor which enters into the product, namely, the personal scientific support of our best men. It is, I think, not too much to say, that without their presence our meetings would fail in their chief and most important element, and had best be discontinued altogether. We make, it must be admitted, a demand of sensible magnitude in calling upon men who have been actively engaged during a great portion of the year, at a season when they may fairly look for relaxation, to attend a busy meeting, and to contribute to its proceedings; but unless a fair quota at least of our veterans, and a good muster of our younger men, put in their appearance, ADDRESS. 7 our gatherings will be to little purpose. There was a period within my own recollection when it was uncertain whether the then younger members of our scientific growth would cast in their lot with us or not, and when the fate of the Association depended very much upon their decision. They _decided in our favour ; they have since become Presidents, Lecturers, and other functionaries of our body ; with what result it is for you to judge. Of the advantages which may possibly accrue to the locality in which our meetings are held, it is not for us to speak ; but it is always a ground for sincere satisfaction to learn that our presence has been of any use in stimulating an interest, or in promoting local efforts, in the direction of Science. The functions of the British Association do not, however, terminate with the meeting itself. Beside the special committees.already mentioned, there remains a very important body, elected by the General Committee, viz., the Council, which assembles at the office in London from time to time as occasion requires. To this body belongs the duty of proposing a President, of preparing for the approval of the General Committee the list of Vice-Presidents and sectional officers, the selection of evening lecturers, and other arrangements for the coming meeting. At the present time another class of questions occupies a good deal of the attention of the Council. In the first generation of the Association, and during the period of unwritten, but not yet traditional, law, questions relating to our own organisation or procedure either “ settled themselves,” or were wisely left to the discretionary powers of those who had taken part in our proceedings during the early years of our existence. These and other kindred subjects now require more careful formularisation and more deliberate sanction. And itis on the shoulders of the Council that the weight of these matters in general falls. Tbese facts deserve especial men- tion on the present occasion, because one part of our business at the close of this meeting will be to bid farewell officially to one who has served us as Assistant Secretary so long and so assiduously that he has latterly become our main repertory of information, and our mentor upon questions of prece- dent and procedure. The post hitherto held by Mr. Griffith (for it is to him that I allude) will doubtless be well filled by the able and energetic member who has been nominated in his place ; but I doubt not that even he will be glad for some time to come to draw largely upon the knowledge and experience of his predecessor. But, beside matters of internal arrangement and organisation, the duties of the Council comprise a variety of scientific subjects referred to them by the General Committee, at the instance of the Committee of Re- commendations, for deliberation and occasionally for action. With the increasing activity of our body in general, and more particularly with that of our various officers, these duties have of late years become more varied and onerous than formerly; nor is it to be wished that they should diminish in either variety or extent. 8 REPORT—1878. Once more, questions beyond our own constitution, and even beyond the scope of our own immediate action, such as education, legislation affecting either the promotion or the applications of science to industrial and social life, which have suggested themselves at our meetings, and received the preliminary sanction of our Committee of Recommendations, are frequently referred to our Council. These, and others which it is unnecessary to particularise, whether discussed in full Council or in com- mittees specially appointed by that body, render the duties of our coun- cillors as onerous as they are important. While the Government has at all times, but ina more marked manner of late years, recognised the Royal Society of London, with representa- tives from the sister societies of Dublin and of Edinburgh, as the body to which it should look for counsel and advice upon scientific questions, it has still never shown itself indisposed to receive and entertain any well-considered recommendation from the British Association. Two special causes have in all probability contributed largely to this result. First, the variety of elements comprised by the Association, on account of which its recommendations imply a more general concurrence of scien- tific opinion than those of any other scientific body. Secondly, the pecu- liar fact, that our period of maximum activity coincides with that of minimum activity of other scientific bodies, is often of the highest import- ance. At the very time when the other bodies are least able, we are most able, to give deliberate consideration, and formal sanction, to recom- mendations whether in the form of applications to Government or other- wise which may arise. In many of these, time is an element so essential, that it is not too much to say, that without the intervention of the British Association many opportunities for the advancement of Science, especially at; the seasons in question, might have been lost. The Government has moreover formally recognised our scientific existence by appointing our President for the time being a member of the Government Fund Com- mittee; and the public has added its testimony to our importance and utility by imposing upon our President and officers a variety of duties, among which are conspicuous those which arise out of its very liberal exercise of civic and other hospitality. Of the nature and functions of the Presidential address this is perhaps neither the time nor the place to speak; but if I might for a moment for- get the purpose for which we are now assembled, I would take the oppor- tunity of reminding those who have not attended many of our former meetings that our annual volumes contain a long series of addresses on the progress of Science, from a number of our most eminent men, to which there is perhaps no parallel elsewhere. These addresses are per- haps as remarkable for their variety in mode of treatment as for the value of their subject-matter. Some of our Presidents, and especially those who officiated in the earlier days of our existence, have passed in review the various branches of Science, and have noted the progress made in ADDRESS. 9 each during the current year. But, as the various Sciences have demanded more and more special treatment on the part of those who seriously pursue them, so have the cases of individuals who can of their own knowledge give anything approaching to a general review become more and more rare. To this may be added the fact that although no year is so barren as to fail in affording sufficient crop for a strictly scientific budget, or for a detailed report of progress in research, yet one year is more fertile than another in growths of sufficient prominence to arrest the attention of the general public, and to supply topics suitable for the address. On these accounts apparently such a Presidential survey has ceased to be annual, and has dropped into an intermittence of longer period. Some Presi- dents have made a scientific principle, such as the Time-element in natural phenomena, or Continuity, or Natural Selection, the theme of their dis- course, and have gathered illustrations from various branches of know- ledge. Others again, taking their own special subject as a fundamental note, and thence modulating into other kindred keys, have borne testi- mony to the fact that no subject is so special as to be devoid of bearing or of influence on many others. Some have described the successive stages of even a single but important investigation ; and while tracing the growth of that particular item, and of the ideas involved in it, have incidentally shown to the outer world what manner of business a serious investigation is. But there is happily no pattern or precedent which the President is bound to follow; both in range of subject-matter and in mode of treat- ment each has exercised his undoubted right of taking an independent line. And it can hardly be doubted that a judicious exercise of this free- dom has contributed more than anything else to sustain the interest of a series of annual discourses extending now over nearly half a century. The nature of the subjects which may fairly come within the scope of such a discourse has of late been much discussed ; and the question is one upon which everyone of course is entitled to form his own judgment; but lest there should be any misapprehension as to how far it concerns us in our corporate capacity, it will be well to remind my hearers that as, on the one hand, there is no discussion on the Presidential address, and the members as a body express no formal opinion upon it, so, on the other, the Association cannot fairly be considered as in any way committed to its tenour or con- clusions. Whether this immunity from comment and reply be really on the whole so advantageous to the President as might be supposed need not here be discussed ; but suffice it to say, that the case of an audience assembled to listen without discussion finds a parallel elsewhere, and in the parallel case it isnot generally considered that the result is altogether either advantageous to the speaker or conducive to excellence in the discourse. But, apart from this, the question of a limitation of range in the subject-matter for the Presidential address is not quite so simple as may at first sight appear. It must, in fact, be borne in mind that, while on 10 REPORT— 1878. the one hand knowledge is distinct from opinion, from feeling, and from all other modes of subjective impression, still the limits of knowledge are at all times expanding, and the boundaries of the known and the unknown are never rigid or permanently fixed. That which in time past or present has belonged to one category may in time future belong to the other. Our ignorance consists partly in ignorance of actual facts, and partly also in ignorance of the possible range of ascertainable fact. If we could lay down beforehand precise limits of possible knowledge, the problem of Physical Science would be already half solved. But the question to which the scientific explorer has often to address himself is not merely whether he is able to solve this or that problem, but whether he can so far unravel the tangled threads of the matter with which he has to deal as to weave them into a definite problem at all. He is not like a candidate at an examination with a precise set of questions placed before him; he must first himself act the part of the examiner and select questions from the repertory of nature, and upon them found others, which in some sense are capable of definite solution. If his eye seem dim, he must look stead- fastly and with hope into the misty vision, until the very ciouds wreath themselves into definite forms. If his ear seem dull, he must listen patiently and with sympathetic trust to the intricate whisperings of nature,—the goddess, as she has been called, of a hundred voices—until here and there he can pick out a few simple notes to which his own powers can resound. If, then, at a moment when he finds himself placed on a pinnacle from which he is called upon to take a perspective survey of the range of science, and to tell us what he can see from his vantage ground ; if, at such a moment, after straining his gaze to the very verge of the horizon, and after describing the most distant of well-defined objects, he should give utterance also to some of the subjective impres- sions which he is conscious of receiving from regions beyond; if he should depict possibilities which seem opening to his view; if he should explain why he thinks this a mere blind alley and that an open path; then the fault and the loss would be alike ours if we refused to listen calmly, and temperately to form our own judgment on what we hear ; then assuredly it is we who would be committing the error of con- founding matters of fact and matters of opinion if we failed to discriminate between the various elements contained in such a discourse, and assumed that they had all been put on the same footing. But to whatever decision we may each come on these controverted points, one thing appears clear from a retrospect of past experience, viz., that first or last, either at the outset in his choice of subject or in the conclusions ultimately drawn therefrom, the President, according to his own account at least, finds himself on every occasion in a position of “exceptional or more than usual difficulty.’”” And your present repre- sentative, like his predecessors, feels himself this moment in a similar predicament. The reason which he now offers is that the branch of ADDRESS. lt science which he represents is one whose lines of advance, viewed from a mathematician’s own point of view, offer so few points of contact with the ordinary experiences of life or modes of thought, that any account of its actual progress which he might have attempted must have failed in the first requisite of an address, namely, that of being intelligible. Now if this esoteric view had been the only aspect of the subject which he could present to his hearers, he might well have given up the attempt in despair. But although i in its technical character Mathematical Science suffers the inconveniences, while it enjoys the dignity, of its. Olympian position, still in a less formal garb, or in disguise, if you are pleased so to call it, it is found present at many an unexpected turn; and although some of us may never have learnt its special language, not a few have, all through our scientific life, and even in almost every accurate utterance, like Moliére’s well known character, been talking mathematics without knowing it. It is, moreover, a fact not to be over- looked that the appearance of isolation, so conspicuous in mathematics, appertains in a greater or less degree to all other sciences, and perhaps also to all pursuits in life. In its highest flight each soars to a distance from its fellows. Each is pursued alone for its own sake, and without reference to its connection with, or its application to, any other subject. The pioneer and the advanced guard are of necessity separated from the main body, and in this respect mathematics does not materially differ from its neighbours. And, therefore, as the solitariness of mathematics has been a frequent theme of discourse, it may be not altogether unpro- fitable to dwell for a short time upon the other side of the question, and to inquire whether there be not points of contact in method or in subject-. matter between mathematics and the outer world which have been frequently overlooked ; whether its lines do not in some cases run parallel to those of other occupations and purposes of life; and lastly, whether we- may not hope for some change in the attitude too often assumed towards it by the representatives of other branches of knowledge and of mental activity. In his Preface to the ‘ Principia’ Newton gives expression to some general ideas which may well serve as the key-note for all future utter- ances on the relation of mathematics to natural, including also therein what are commonly called artificial, phenomena. “The ancients divided mechanics into two parts, rational and prac- tical; and since artizans often work inaccurately, it came to pass that mechanics and geometry were distinguished in this way, that everything accurate was referred to geometry, and everything inaccurate to mechanics. But the inaccuracies appertain to the artizan and not to the art, and geometry itself has its foundation in mechanical practice, and is in fact nothing else than that part of universal mechanics which accu-. rately lays down and demonstrates the art of measuring.” He next explains that rational mechanics is the science of motion resulting from 12 REPORT— 1878. torces, and adds, “The whole difficulty of philosophy seems to me to le in investigating the forces of nature from the phenomena of motion, and in demonstrating that from these forces other phenomena will ensue.” Then, after stating the problems of which he has treated in the work itself, he says, ‘I would that all other natural phenomena might similarly be deduced from mechanical principles. For many things move me to suspect that everything depends upon certain forces in virtue of which the particles of bodies, through forces not yet understood, are either impelled together so as to cohere in regular tigures, or are repelled and recede from one another.” Newton’s views, then, are clear. He regards mathematics, not as a method independent of, though applicable to, various subjects, but as itself the higher side or aspect of the subjects themselves; and it would be little more than a translation of his notions into other language, little more than a paraphrase of his own words, if we were to describe the mathematical as one aspect of the material world itself, apart from which all other aspects are but incomplete sketches, and, however accurate after their own kind, are still liable to the imperfections of the imaccu- rate artificer. Mr. Burrowes, in his Preface to the first volume of the ‘Transactions of the Royal Irish Academy,’ has carried out the same argument, approaching it from the other side. ‘ No one science,” he says, “is so little connected with the rest as not to afford many principles whose use may extend considerably beyond the science to which they primarily belong, and no proposition is so purely theoretical as to be in- capable of being applied to practical purposes. There is no apparent connexion between duration and the cycloidal arch, the properties ot which have furnished us with the best method of measuring time; and he who has made himself master of the nature and affections of the loga- rithmic curve has advanced considerably towards ascertaining the propor- tionable density of the air at various distances from the earth. The researches of the mathematician are the only sure ground on which we can reason from experiments; and how far experimental science may assist commercial interests is evinced by the success of manufactures in countries where the hand of the artificer has taken its direction from the philosopher. Every manufacture is in reality but a chemical process, and the machinery requisite for carrying it on but the right application of certain propositions in rational mechanics.” So far your Academiciar. Every subject, therefore, whether in its usual acceptation scientific or otherwise, may have a mathematical aspect; as soon, in fact, as it becomes a matter of strict measurement, or of numerical statement, so soon does it enter upon a mathematical phase. This phase may, or it may not, be a prelude to another in which the laws of the subject are expressed in algebraical formule or represented by geometrical figures. But the real gist of the business does not always le in the mode of expression, and the fascination of the formule or other mathematical ADDRESS. 13 paraphernalia may after all be little more than that of a theatrical trans- formation scene. The process of reducing to formule is really one of abstraction, the results of which are not always wholly on the side of gain; in fact, through the process itself the subject may lose in one respect even more than it gains in another. But long before such abstraction is completely attained, and even in cases where it is never attained at all, a subject may to all intents and purposes become mathe- matical. It is not so much elaborate calculations or abstruse processes which characterise this phase as the principles of precision, of exactness, and of proportion. But these are principles with which no true know- ledge can entirely dispense. If it be the general scientific spirit which at the outset moves upon the face of the waters, and out of the unknown depth brings forth light and living forms, it is no less the mathematical spirit which breathes the breath of life into what would otherwise have ever remained mere dry bones of fact, which reunites the scattered limbs and re-creates from them a new and organic whole. And as a matter of fact, in the words used by Professor Jellett at our meeting at Belfast, viz., ‘‘ Not only are we applying our methods to many sciences already recognised as belonging to the legitimate province of mathematics, but we are learning to apply the same instrument to sciences hitherto wholly or partially independent of its authority. Physical Science is learning more and more every day to see in the phenomena of Nature modifications of that one phenomenon (namely, Motion) which is peculiarly under the power of mathematics.” Hchoes are these, far off and faint perhaps, but still true echoes, in answer to Newton’s wish that all these phenomena may some day “be deduced from mechanical prin- ciples.”’ If, turning from this aspect of the subject, it were my purpose to enumerate how the same tendency has evinced itself in the Arts, un- consciously it may be to the artists themselves, I might call as witnesses each one in turn with full reliance on the testimony which they would bear. And, having more special reference to mathematics, I might con- fidently point to the accuracy of measurement, to the truth of curve, which according to modern investigation is the key to the perfection of classic art. I might triumphantly cite not only the architects of all ages, whose art so manifestly rests upon mathematical principles; but I might cite also the literary as well as the artistic remains of the great artists of Cinquecento, both painters and sculptors, in evidence of the geometry and the mechanics which, having been Jaid at the foundation, appear to have found their way upwards through the superstructure of their works. And in a less ambitious sphere, but nearer to ourselves in both time and place, I might point with satisfaction to the great school of English con- structors of the 18th century in the domestic arts; and remind you,that not only the engineer and the architect, but even the cabinetmakers, devoted half the space of their books to perspective and to the principles 14 REPORT—1878. whereby solid figures may be delineated on paper, or what is now termed descriptive geometry. Nor perhaps would the sciences which concern themselves with reasoning and speech, nor the kindred art of Music, nor even Literature itself, if thoroughly probed, offer fewer points of dependence upon the science of which I am speaking. What, in fact, is Logic but that part of universal reasoning; Grammar but that part of universal speech; Harmony and Counterpoint but that part of universal music, ‘“ which aceu- rately lays down,”’ and demonstrates (so far as demonstration is possible) precise methods appertaining to each of these Arts? And I might even appeal to the common consent which speaks of the mathematical as the pattern form of reasoning and model of a precise style. Taking, then, precision and exactness as the characteristics which distinguish the mathematical phase of a subject, we are naturally led to expect that the approach to such a phase will be indicated by increasing application of the principle of measurement, and by the importance which is attached to numerical results. And this very necessary condition for progress may, I think, be fairly described as one of the main features of scientific advance in the present day. If it were my purpose, by descending into the arena of special sciences, to show how the most various investigations alike tend to issue in measurement, and to that extent to assume a mathematical phase, I should be embarrassed by the abundance of instances which might be adduced. I will therefore confine myself to a passing notice of a very few, selecting those which exemplify not only the general tendency, but also the special character of the measurements now particularly required, viz., that of minuteness, and the indirect method by which alone we can at present hope to approach them. An object having a diameter of an 80,000th of an inch is perhaps the smallest of which the microscope could give any well-defined representation ; and it is improbable that one of 120,000th of an inch could be singly discerned with the highest powers at our com- mand. But the solar beams and the electric light reveal to us the presence of bodies far smaller than these. And, in the absence of any means of observing them singly, Professor Tyndall has suggested a scale of these minute objects in terms of the lengths of luminiferous waves. To this he was led, not by any attempt at individual measurement, but by taking account of them in the aggregate, and observing the tints which they scatter laterally when clustered in the form of actinic clouds. The small bodies with which experimental Science has recently come into contact are not confined to gaseous molecules, but comprise also complete organisms; and the same philosopher has made a profound study of the momentous influence exerted by these minute organisms in the economy of life. And if, in view of their specific effects, whether deleterious or other, on human life, any qualitative classification, or quantitative estimate be ever possible, it seems that it must be effected by some such method as that indicated above. ADDRESS. 15 Again, to enumerate a few more instances of the measurement of minute quantities, there are the average distances of molecules from one another in various gases and at various pressures; the length of their free path, or range open for their motion without coming into collision ; there are movements causing the pressures and differences of pressure under which Mr. Crookes’ radiometers execute their wonderful revolutions. There are the excursions of the air while transmitting notes of high pitch, which through the researches of Lord Rayleigh appear to be of a diminu- tiveness altogether unexpected. There are the molecular actions brought into play in the remarkable experiments by Dr. Kerr, who has succeeded, where even Faraday failed, in effecting a visible rotation of the plane of polarisation of light in its passage through electrified dielectrics, and on its reflexion at the surface of amagnet. To take one more instance, which must be present to the minds of us all, there are the infinitesimal ripples of the vibrating plate in Mr. Graham Bell’s most marvellous invention. Of the nodes and ventral segments in the plate of the telephone which actually converts sound into electricity and electricity into sound, we can at present form no conception. All that can now be said is that the most perfect specimens of Chladni’s sand figures on a vibrating plate, or of Kandt’s lycopodium heaps in a musical tube, or even Mr. Sedley Taylor’s more delicate vortices in the films of the Phoneidoscope, are rough and sketchy compared with these. For notwithstanding the fact that in the movements of the Telephone-plate we have actually in our hand the solu- tion of that old world problem, the construction of a speaking machine ; yet the characters in which that solution is expressed are too small for our powers of decipherment. In movements such as these we seem to lose sight of the distinction, or perhaps we have unconsciously passed the boundary between massive and molecular motion. Through the Phonograph we have not only a transformation but a per- manent and tangible record of the mechanism of speech. But the differ- ences upon which articulation (apart from loudness, pitch, and quality) depends, appear from the experiments of Fleeming Jenkin and of others to be of microscopic size. The Microphone affords another instance of the unexpected value of minute variations,—in this case of electric currents ; and it is remarkable that the gist of the instrument seems to lie in obtain- ing and perfecting that which electricians have hitherto most scrupulously . avoided, viz., loose contact. Once more, Mr. De La Rue has brought forward as one of the results derived from his stupendous battery of 10,000 cells, strong evidence for supposing that a voltaic discharge, even when apparently continuous, may still be an intermittent phenomenon ; but all that is known of the period of such intermittence is, that it must recur at exceedingly short intervals. And in connexion with this subject, it may be added that, whatever be the ultimate explanation of the strange stratification which the voltaic discharge undergoes in rarefied gases, it is clear that the alternate disposi- 16 REPORT—1878. tion of light and darkness must be dependent on some periodic distribution in space or sequence in time which can at present be dealt with only in a very general way, In the exhausted column we have a vehicle for elec- tricity not constant like an ordinary conductor, but itself modified by the passage of the discharge, and perhaps subject to laws differing materially from those which it obeys at atmospheric pressure. It may also be that some of the features accompanying stratification form a magnified image of phenomena belonging to disruptive discharges in general; and that consequently, so far from expecting among the known facts of the latter any clue to an explanation of the former, we must hope ultimately to find in the former an elucidation of what is at present obscure in the latter. A prudent philosopher usually avoids hazarding any forecast of the practical application of a purely scientific research. But it would seem that the configuration of these strie might some day prove a very delicate means of estimating low pressures, and perhaps also for effecting some electrical measurements. Now, it is a curious fact that almost the only small quantities of which we have as yet any actual measurements are the wave lengths of light; and that all others, excepting so far as they can be deduced from these, await future determination. In the meantime, when unable to approach these small quantities individually, the method to which we are obliged to have recourse is, as indicated above, that of averages, whereby, disre- garding the circumstances of each particular case, we calculate the average size, the average velocity, the average direction, &c., of a large number of instances. But although this method is based upon experience, and leads to results which may be accepted as substantially true; although it may be applicable to any finite interval of time, or over any finite area of space (that is, for all practical purposes of life), there is no evidence to show that it is so when the dimensions of interval or of area are indefinitely diminished. The truth is that the simplicity of nature which we at present grasp is really the result of infinite complexity; and that below the uni- formity there underlies a diversity whose depths we have not yet probed, and whose secret places are still beyond our reach. The present is not an occasion for multiplying illustrations, bat I can hardly omit a passing allusion to one all-important instance of the appli- cation of the statistical method. Without its aid social life, or the History of Life and Death, could not be conceived at all, or only in the most super- ficial manner. Without it we could never attain to any clear ideas of the condition of the Poor, we could never hope for any solid amelioration of their condition or prospects. Without its aid, sanitary measures, and even medicine, would be powerless. Without it, the politician and the philan- thropist would alike be wandering over a trackless desert. It is, however, not so much from the side of Science at large as from that of Mathematics itself, that I desire to speak. I wish from the latter point of view to indicate connexions between Mathematics and other sub- ADDRESS. i: jects, to prove that hers is not after all such a far-off region, nor so unde- cipherable an alphabet, and to show that even at unlikely spots we may trace under-currents of thought which having issued from a common source fertilise alike the mathematical and the non-mathematical world. Having this in view, I propose to make the subject of special remark some processes peculiar to modern Mathematics; and, partly with the object of incidentally removing some current misapprehensions, I have selected for examination three methods in respect of which mathematicians are often thought to have exceeded all reasonable limits of speculation, and to have adopted for unknown purposes an unknown tongue. And it will be my endeavour to show not only that in these very cases our science has not outstepped its own legitimate range, but that even art and litera- ture have unconsciously employed methods similar in principle. The three methods in question are, first, that of Imaginary Quantities ; secondly, that of Manifold Space ; and thirdly, that of Geometry not according to Euclid. First it is objected that, abandoning the more cautious methods of ancient mathematicians, we have admitted into our formule quantities which by our own showing, and even in our own nomenclature, are imaginary or impossible ; nay, more, that out of them we have formed a variety of new algebras to which there is no counterpart whatever in reality ; but from which we claim to arrive at possible and certain results. On this head it is in Dublin, if anywhere, that I may be permitted to speak. For to the fertile imagination of the late Astronomer Royal for Treland we are indebted for that marvellous Calculus of Quaternions, which is only now beginning to be fully understood, and which has not yet received all the applications of which it is doubtless capable. And even although this calculus be not coextensive with another which almost simul- taneously germinated on the Continent, nor with ideas more recently developed in America ; yet it must always hold its position as an original discovery, and as a representative of one of the two great groups of gene- ralised algebras (viz., those the squares of whose units are respectively negative unity and zero), the common origin of which must still be marked on our intellectual map as an unknown region. Well do I re- collect how in its early days we used to handle the method as a magician’s page might try to wield his master’s wand, trembling as it were between hope and fear, and hardly knowing whether to trust our owz results until they had been submitted to the present and ever-ready counsel of Sir W. R. Hamilton himself. To fix our ideas, consider the measurement of a line, or tne reckoning of time, or the performance of any mathematical operation. A line may be measured in one direction or in the opposite; time may be reckoned forward or backward ; an operation may be performed or be reversed, it may ve done or may be undone; and if having once reversed any of these processes we reverse it a second time, we shall find that we have come 1878. B 18 REPORT—1878. back to the original direction of measurement or of reckoning, or to the original kind of operation. Suppose, however, that at some stage of a calculation our formule indicate an alteration in the mode of measurement such that, if the alteration be repeated, a condition of things, not the same as, but the reverse of the original, will be produced. Or suppose that, at a certain stage, our transformations indicate that time is to be reckoned in some manner different from future or past, but still ina way having definite algebraical connexion with time which is gone and time which is to come. It is clear that in actual experience there is no process to which such measurements correspond. Time has no meaning except as future or past; and the present is but the meeting point of the two. Or, once more, suppose that we are gravely told that all circles pass through the same two imaginary points at an infinite distance, and that every line drawn through one of these points is perpendicular to itself. On hearing the statement, we shall probably whisper, with a smile or a sigh, that we hope it is not true; but that in any case it is a long way off, and perhaps, after © all, it does not very much signify. If, however, as mathematicians we are not satisfied to dismiss the question on these terms, we ourselves must admit that we have here reached a definite point of issue. Our science must either give a rational account of the dilemma, or yield the position as no longer tenable. Special modes of explaining this anomalous state of things have occurred to mathematicians. But, omitting details as unsuited to the present occasion, it will, I think, be sufficient to point out in general terms that a solution of the difficulty is to be found in the fact that the formulee which give rise to these results are more comprehensive than the significa- tion assigned to them; and when we pass out of the condition of things first contemplated they cannot (as it is obvious they ought not) give us any results intelligible on that basis. But it does not therefore by any means follow that upon a more enlarged basis the formule are incapable of interpretation; on the contrary, the difficulty at which we have arrived indicates that there must be some more comprehensive state- ment of the problem which will include cases impossible in the more limited, but possible in the wider view of the subject. A very simple instance will illustrate the matter. If from a point out- side a circle we draw a straight line to touch the curve, the distance between the starting point and the point of contact has certain geometrical properties. If the starting point be shifted nearer and nearer to the circle the distance in question becomes shorter, and ultimately vanishes. But as soon as the point passes to the interior of the circle the notion of a tangent and distance to the point of contact cease to have any meaning ; and the same anomalous condition of things prevails as long as the point remains in the interior. But if the point be shifted still further until it emerges on the other side, the tangent and its properties resume their ADDRESS. 19 reality, and are as intelligible as before. Now the process whereby we have passed from the possible to the impossible, and again repassed to the possible (namely, the shifting of the starting point) is a perfectly con- tinuous one, while the conditions of the problem as stated above have abruptly changed. If, however, we replace the idea of a line touching by that of a line cutting the circle, and the distance of the point of contact . by the distances at which the line is intercepted by the curve, it will easily be seen that the latter includes the former as a limiting case, when the cut- ting line is turned about the starting point until it coincides with the tangent itself. And further, that the two intercepts have a perfectly distinct and intelligible meaning whether the point be outside or inside the area. The only difference is that in the first case the intercepts are measured in the same direction ; in the latter in opposite directions. The foregoing instance has shown one purpose which these imaginaries may serve, viz., as marks indicating a limit to a particular condition of things, to the application of a particular law, or pointing out a stage where a more comprehensive law is required. To attain to sucha law we must, as in the instance of the circle and tangent, reconsider our statement of the problem; we must go back to the principle from which we set out, and ascertain whether it may not be modified or enlarged. And even if in any particular investigation, wherein imaginaries have occurred, the most comprehensive statement of the problem of which we are at present capable fails to give an actual representation of these quantities; if they must for the present be relegated to the category of imaginaries; it still does not follow that we may not at some future time find a law which will endow them with reality, nor that in the meantime we need hesitate to employ them, in accordance with the great principle of continuity, for bringing out correct results. If, moreover, both in Geometry and in Algebra we occasionally make use of points or of quantities, which from our present outlook have no real existence, which can neither be delineated in space of which we have experience, nor measured by scale as we count measurement; if these imaginaries, as they are termed, are called up by legitimate processes of our science; if they serve the purpose not merely of suggesting ideas, but of actually conducting us to practical conclusions ; if all this be true in abstract science, 1 may perhaps be allowed to point out, in illustration of my argument, that in Art unreal forms are frequently used for suggesting ideas, for conveying a meaning for which no others seem to be suitable or adequate. Are not forms unknown to Biology, situations incompatible with gravitation, positions which challenge not merely the stability but even the possibility of equilibrium,—are not these the very means fo which the artist often has recourse in order to convey his meaning and to fulfil his mission? Who that has ever revelled in the ornamentation of the Renaissance, in the extraordinary transitions from the animal to the vegetable, from faunic to floral forms, and from these again to almost B2 20 REPORT—187 58. purely geometric curves, who has not felt that these imaginaries have a claim to recognition very similar to that of their congeners in mathe- matics? How is it that the grotesque paintings of the Middle Ages, the fantastic sculpture of remote nations, and even the rude art of the pre- historic past, still impress us, and have an interest over and above their antiquarian value; unless it be that they are symbols which, although hard of interpretation when taken alone, are yet capable from a more com- prehensive point of view of leading us mentally to something beyond themselves, and to truths which, although reached through them, have a reality scarcely to be attributed to their outward forms P Again, if we turn from Art to Letters, truth to nature and to fact is un- doubiedly a characteristic of sterling literature ; and yet in the delinea- tion of outward nature itself, still more in that of feelings and affections, of the secret parts of character and motives of conduct, it frequently happens that the writer is driven to imagery, to an analogy, or even to a paradox, in order to give utterance to that of which there is no direct counterpart in recognised speech. And yet which of us cannot find a meaning for these literary figures, an inward response to imaginative poetry, to social fiction, or even to those tales of giant and fairyland written, it is supposed, only for the nursery or schoolroom? But in order thus to reanimate these things with a meaning beyond that of the mere words, have we not to reconsider our first position, to enlarge the ideas with which we started; have we not to cast about for some thing which is common to the idea conveyed and to the subject actually described, and to seek for the sympathetic spring which underlies both; have we not, like the mathematician, to go back as it were to some first principles, or, as it is pleasanter to describe it, to become again as a little child P Passing to the second of the three methods, viz., that of Manifold Space, it may first be remarked that our whole experience of space is in three dimensions, viz., of that which has tength, breadth, and thickness ; and if for certain purposes we restrict our ideas to two dimensions as in plane geometry, or to one dimension as in the division of a straight line, we do this only by consciously and of deliberate purpose setting aside, but not annihilating, the remaining one or two dimensions. Negation, as Hegel has justly remarked, implies that which is negatived, or, as he expresses it, affirms the opposite. Itis by abstraction from previous ex- perience, by a limitation of its results, and not by any independent process, that we arrive at the idea of space whose dimensions are less than three. Tt is doubtless on this account that problems in plane geometry which, although capable of solution on their own account, become much more intelligible, more easy of extension, if viewed in connexion with solid space, and as special cases of corresponding problems in solid geometry. So eminently is this the case, that the very language of the more general method often leads us almost intuitively to conclusions which, from the more restricted point of view, require long and laborious proof. Such a ADDRESS. 21 change in the base of operations has, in fact, been successfully made in geometry of two dimensions, and although we have not the same experi- mental data for the further steps, yet neither the modes of reasoning, nor the validity of its conclusions, are in any way affected by applying an analogous mental process to geometry of three dimensions; and by regarding figures in space of three dimensions as sections of figures in space of four, in the same way that figures in plano are sometimes con- sidered as sections of figures in solid space. The addition of a fourth dimension to space not only extends the actual properties of geometrical figures, but it also adds new properties which are often useful forthe pur- poses of transformation or of proof. Thus it has recently been shown that in four dimensions a closed material shell could be turned inside out by simple flexure, without either stretching or tearing; and that in such a space it is impossible to tie a knot. Again, the solution of problems in geometry is often effected by means of algebra; and as three measurements, or co-ordinates as they are called, determine the position of a point in space, so do three letters or measure- able quantities serve for the same purpose in the language of algebra. Now, many algebraical problems involving three unknown or ore bla quantities admit of being generalised so as to give problems involving many such quantities. And as, on the one hand, to every alechedcal problem involving unknown quantities or variables by ones, or by twos, or by threes, there corresponds a problem in geometry of one or of two or of three dimensions; so on the other it may be said that to every algebraical problem involving many variables there corresponds a problem in geometry of many dimensions. There is, however, another aspect under which even ordinary space presents to us a four-fold, or indeed a mani-fold, character. In modern Physics, space is regarded not as a vacuum in which bodies are placed and forces have play, but rather as a plenum with which matter is co- extensive. And from a physical point of view the properties of space are the properties of matter, or of the medium which fills it. Similarly from a mathematical point of view, space may be regarded as a locus in quo, as a plenum, filled with those elements of geometrical magnitude which we take as fundamental. These elements need not always be the same. For different purposes different elements may be chosen; and upon the degree of complexity of the subject of our choice will depend the internal structure or mani-foldness of space. _ Thus, beginning with the simplest case, a point may have any singly infinite multitude of positions in a line, which gives a one-fold system of points in a line. The line may revolve in a plane about any one of its points, giving a two-fold system of points in a plane; and the plane may revolve about any one of the lines, giving a three-fold system of points in space. ' Suppose, however, that we take a straight line as our element, and 22 REPORT—1878. conceive space as filled with such lines. This will be the case if we take two planes, e.g., two parallel planes, and join every point in one with every point in the other. Now the points in a plane form a two-fold system, and it therefore follows that the system of lines is four-fold; in other words, space regarded as a plenum of lines is four-fold. The same result follows from the consideration that the lines in a plane, and the planes through a point, are each two-fold. Again, if we take a sphere as our element we can through any point as a centre draw a singly infinite number of spheres, but the number of such centres is triply infinite; hence space as a plenum of spheres is four- fold. And, generally, space as a plenum of surfaces has a mani-foldness equal to the number of constants required to determine the surface. Although it would be beyond our present purpose to attempt to pursue the subject further, it should not pass unnoticed that the identity in the four-fold character of space, as derived on the one hand from a system of straight lines, and on the other from a system of spheres, is intimately connected with the principies established by Sophus Lie in his researches on the correlation of these figures. If we take a circle as our element we can around any point in a plane as a centre draw a singly infinite system of circles; but the number of such centres in a plane is doubly infinite; hence the circles in a plane form a three-fold system, and as the planes in space form a three-fold system, it follows that space as a plenum of circles is six-fold. Again, if we take a circle as our element, we may regard it as a section either of a sphere, or of a right cone (given except in position) by a plane perpendicular to the axis. In the former case the position of the centre is three-fold ; the directions of the plane, like that of a pencil of lines perpendicular thereto, two-fold; and the radius of the sphere one- fold ; six-fold in all. In the latter case, the position of the vertex is three-fold ; the direction of the axis two-fold; and the distance of the plane of section one-fold; six-fold in all, as before. Hence space as a plenum of circles is six-fold. Similarly, if we take a conic as our element we may regard it as a section of a right cone {given except in position) by a plane. If the nature of the conic be defined, the plane of section will be inclined at a fixed angle to the axis; otherwise it will be free to take any inclination whatever. This being so, the position of the vertex will be three-fold ; the direction of the axis two-fold; the distance of the plane of section from the vertex one-fold ; and the direction of that plane one-fold if the conic be defined, two-fold if it be not defined. Hence, space as a plenum of definite conics will be seven-fold, as a plenum of conics in general eight-fold. And so on for curves of higher degrees. This is in fact the whole story and mystery of manifold space. It is not seriously regarded as a reality in the same sense as ordinary space ; ADDRESS. ue it is a mode of representation, or a method which, having served its pur- pose, vanishes from the scene. Like a rainbow, if we try to grasp it, it eludes our very touch ; but, like a rainbow, it arises out of real conditions of known and tangible quantities, and if rightly apprehended it is a true and valuable expression of natural laws, and serves a definite purpose in the science of which it forms part. Again, if we seek a counterpart of this in common life, I might remind you that perspective in drawing is itself a method not altogether dissimilar to that of which I have been speaking; and that the third dimension of space, as represented in a picture, has its origin in the painter’s mind, and is due to his skill, but has no real existence upon the canvas which is the groundwork of his art. Oragain, turning to literature, when in legendary tales, or in works of fiction, things past and future are pictured as present, has not the poetic fancy correlated time with the three dimensions of space, and brought all alike to a common focus? Or once more, when space already filled with material substances is mentally peopled with immaterial beings, may not the imagination be regarded as having added a new element to the capacity of space, a fourth dimension of which there is no evidence in experimental fact ? The third method proposed for special remark is that which has been termed Non-Euclidean Geometry; and the train of reasoning which has led to it may be described in general terms as follows: some of the pro- perties of space which on account of their simplicity, theoretical as well as practical, have, in constructing the ordinary system of geometry, beer con- sidered as fundamental, are now seen to be particular cases of more general properties. Thus a plane surface, and a straight line, may be regarded as special instances of surfaces and lines whose curvature is everywhere uni- form or constant. And it is perhaps not difficult to see that, when the special notions of flatness and straightness are abandoned, many properties of geometrical figures which we are in the habit of regarding as fundamen- tal will undergo profound modification. Thus a plane may be considered as a special case of the sphere, viz., the limit to which a sphere approaches when its radius is increased without limit. But even this consideration trenches upon an elementary proposition relating to one of the simplest of geometrical figures. In plane triangles the interior angles are together equal to two right angles; but in triangles traced on the surface of a sphere this proposition does not hold good. To this, other instances might be added. Further, these modifications may affect not only our ideas of particular geometrical figures, but the very axioms of the Science itself. Thus, the idea, which in fact les at the foundation of Euclid’s method, viz., that a geo- metrical figure may be moved in space without change of size or alteration of form, entirely falls away, or becomes only approximate in a space wherein dimension and form are dependent upon position. For instance, if we consider merely the case of figures traced on a flattened globe like 24 REPORT—1878. the earth’s surface, or upon an eggshell, such figures cannot be made to slide upon the surface without change of form, as is the case with figures traced upon.a plane or even upon a sphere. But, further still, these generalisations are not restricted to the case of figures traced upon a sur- face ; they may apply also to solid figures in a space whose very configu- ration varies from point to point. We may, for instance, imagine a space in which our rule or scale of measurement varies as it extends, or as it moves about, in one direction or another ; a space, in fact, whose geometric density is not uniformly distributed. Thus we might picture to ourselves such a space as a field having a more or less complicated distribution of temperature, and our scale as a rod instantaneously susceptible of expan- sion or contraction under the influence of heat: or we might suppose space to be even crystalline in its geometric formation, and our scale and measuring instruments to accept the structure of the locality in which they are applied. These ideas are doubtless difficult of apprehension, at all events at the outset; but Helmholtz has pointed out a very familiar phenomenon which may be regarded as a diagram of such a kind of space. The picture formed by reflexion from a plane mirror may be taken as a earrect representation of ordinary space, in which, subject to the usual laws of perspective, every object appears in the same form and of the same dimensions whatever be its position. In like manner the picture formed by reflexion from a curved mirror may be regarded as the representation of a space wherein dimension and form are dependent upon position. Thus in an ordinary convex mirror objects appear smaller as they recede laterally from the centre of the picture; straight lines become curved; objects infinitely distant in front of the mirror appear at a distance only equal to the focal length behind. And by suitable modifications in the curvature of the mirror, representations could similarly be obtained of space of various configurations. The diversity in kind of these spaces is of course infinite; they vary with the mode in which we generalise our conceptions of ordinary space ; but upon each as a basis it is possible to construct a consistent system of geometry, whose laws, as a matter of strict reasoning, have a validity and truth not inferior to those with which we are habitually familiar. Such systems having been actually constructed, the question has not unnaturally been asked, whether there is anything in nature or in the outer world to which they correspond ; whether, admitting that for our limited experi- ence ordinary geometry amply suffices, we may understand that for powers more extensive in range or more minute in definition some more general scheme would be requisite? Thus, for example, although the one may serve for the solar system, is it legitimate to suppose that it may fail to apply at distances reaching to the fixed stars, or to regions beyond ? | Or again, if our vision could discern the minute configuration of portions of space, which to our ordinary powers appear infinitesimally small, should we expect to find that all our usual Geometry is but a special case, suffi- ——- =. - - =” ~~ ADDRESS. 25 cient indeed for daily use, but after all only a rough approximation to a truer although perhaps more complicated scheme? Traces of these ques- tions are in fact to be found in the writings of some of our greatest and most original mathematicians. Gauss, Riemann, and Helmholtz have thrown out suggestions radiating as it were in these various directions from a common centre; while Cayley, ‘Sylvester, and Clifford in this country, Klein in Germany, Lobatcheffsky in Russia, Bolyai in Hungary, and Beltrami in Italy, with many others, have reflected kindred ideas with all the modifications due to the chromatic dispersion of their individual minds. But to the main question the answer must be in the negative. And, to use the words of Newton, since “‘ Geometry has its foundation in mechanical practice,” the same must be the answer until our experience is different from what it now is. And yet, all this notwithstanding, generalised conceptions of space are not without their practical utility. The principle of representing space of one kind by that of another, and figures belonging to one by their analogues in the other, is not only recognised as legitimate in pure mathematics, but has long ago found its application in cartography. In maps or charts, geographical positions, the contour of coasts, and other features, belonging in reality to the Earth’s surface, are represented on the flat; and to each mode of repre- sentation, or projection as it is called, there corresponds a special correla- tion between the spheroid and the plane. To this might perhaps be added the method of descriptive geometry, and all similar processes in use by engineers, both military and civil. It has often been asked whether modern research in the field of Pure Mathematics has not so completely outstripped its physical applications as to be practically useless ; whether the analyst and the geometer might not now, and fora long time to come, fairly say, ‘‘ hic artem remumque repono,” and turn his attention to Mechanics and to Physics. That the Pure has outstripped the Applied is largely true; but that the former is on that account useless is far from true. Its utility often crops up até unexpected points; witness the aids to classification of physical quanti- ties, furnished by the ideas (of Scalar and Vector) involved in the Calculus of Quaternions; or the advantages which have accrued to Physical Astro- nomy from Lagrange’s Equations, and from Hamilton’s Principle of Vary- ing Action; on the value of Complex Quantities, and the properties of general Integrals, and of general theorems on integration for the Theories of Electricity and Magnetism. The utility of such researches can in no case be discounted, or even imagined beforehand ; who, for instance, would have supposed that the Calculus of Forms or the Theory of Substitu- tions would have thrown much light upon ordinary equations; or that _ Abelian Functions and Hyperelliptic Transcendents would have told us anything about the properties of curves; or that the Calculus of Opera- tions would have helped us in any way towards the figure of the Harth ? But upon such technical points I must not now dwell. If, however, as 26 REPORT—1878. I hope, it has been sufficiently shown that any of these more extended ideas enable us to combine together, and to deal with as one, properties and processes which from the ordinary point of view present marked dis- tinctions, then they will have justified their own existence ; and in using them we shall not have been walking in a vain shadow, nor disquieting our brains in vain. These extensions of mathematical ideas would, however, be over- whelming, if they were not compensated by some simplifications in the processes actually employed. Of these aids to calculation I will men- tion only two, viz., symmetry of form, and mechanical appliances; or, say, Mathematics as a Fine Art, and Mathematics as a Handicraft. And first, as to symmetry of form. There are many passages of algebra in which long processes of calculation at the outset seem unavoidable. Re- sults are often obtained in the first instance through a tangled maze of formule, where at best we can just make sure of our process step by step, without any general survey of the path which we have traversed, and still less of that which we have to pursue. But almost within our own generation a new method has been devised to clear this entangle- ment. More correctly speaking, the method is not new, for it is inhe- rent in the processes of algebra itself, and instances of it, unnoticed per- haps or disregarded, are to be found cropping up throughout nearly all mathematical treatises. By Lagrange, and to some extent also by Gauss, among the older writers, the method of which I am speaking was recog- nised as a principle; but beside these perhaps no others can be named natil a period within our own recollection. The method consists in sym- metry of expression. In algebraical formule combinations of the quan- tities entering therein occur and recur; and by a suitable choice of these quantities the various combinations may be rendered symmetrical, and reduced to a few well-known types. This having been done, and one such combination having been calculated, the remainder, together with many of their results, can often be written down at once, without further calculations, by simple permutations of the letters. Symmetrical expres- sions, moreover, save as much time and trouble in reading as in writing. Instead of wading laboriously through a series of expressions which, although successively dependent, bear no outward resemblance to one another, we may read off symmetrical formule, of almost any length, at a glance. A page of such formule becomes a picture: known forms are seen in definite groupings; their relative positions, or perspective as it may be called, their very light and shadow, convey their meaning almost as much through the artistic faculty as through any conscious ratioci- native process. [ew principles have been more suggestive of extended ideas or of new views and relations than that of which I am now speak- ing. In order to pass from questions concerning plane figures to those which appertain to space, from conditions having few degrees of freedom to others which have many—in a word, from more restricted to less re- ADDRESS. 27 stricted problems—we have in many cases merely to add lines and columns to our array of letters or symbols already formed, and then read off pictorially the extended theorems. Next as to mechanical appliances. Mr. Babbage, when speaking of the difficulty of ensuring accuracy in the long numerical calculations of theoretical astronomy, remarked that the science which in itself is the most accurate and certain of all had, through these difficulties, become inaccurate and uncertain in some of its results. And it was doubtless some such consideration as this, coupled with his dislike of employing skilled labour where unskilled would suffice, which led him to the inven- tion of his calculating machines. The idea of substituting mechanical for. intellectual power has not lain dormant; for beside the arith- metical machines whose name is legion (from Napier’s Bones, Harl Stanhope’s calculator, to Schultz and Thomas’s machines now in actual use) an invention has lately been designed for even a more difficult task. Prof. James Thomson has in fact recently constructed a machine which, by means of the mere friction of a disk, a cylinder, and a ball, is capable of effecting a variety of the complicated calcula- tions which occur in the highest application of mathematics to physical problems. By its aid it seems that an unskilled labourer may, in a given time, perform the work of ten skilled arithmeticians. The machine is applicable alike to the calculation of tidal, of mag- netic, of meteorological, and perhaps also of all other periodic phe- nomena. It will solve differential equations of the second and perhaps of even higher orders. And through the same invention the probiem of finding the free motions of any number of mutually attracting particles, unrestricted by any of the approximate suppositions required in the treat- ment of the Lunar and Planetary Theories, is reduced to the simple process of turning a handle. When Wiaeaiday had completed the Sipih ental part of a physical problem, and desired that it should thenceforward be treated mathemati- eally, he used irreverently to say, “Hand it over to the calculators.” But truth is ever stranger than fiction; and if he had lived until our day, he might with perfect propriety have said, “ Hand it over to the machine.” Had time permitted, the foregoing topics would have led me to point out that the mathematician, although concerned only with abstractions, uses many of the same methods of research as are employed in other sciences, and in the arts, such as observation, experiment, induction, imagination. But this is the less necessary because the subject has been already handled very ably, although with greater brevity than might have been wished, by Professor Sylvester in his address to Section A. at our meeting at Exeter. In an exhaustive treatment of my subject there would still remain a question which in one sense lies at the bottom of all others, and which through almost all time has had an attraction for reflective minds, viz., 28 REPORT—-1878. what was the origin of mathematical ideas? Are they to be regarded as independent of, or dependent upon, experience? The question has been answered sometimes in one way and sometimes in another. But the absence of any satisfactory conclusion may after all be understood as im- plying that no answer is possible in the sense in which the question is put ; or rather that there is no question at all in the matter, except as to the history of actual facts. And, even if we distinguish, as we certainly should, between the origin of ideas in the individual and their origin in a nation or mankind, we should still come to the same conclusion. If we take the case of the individual, all we can do is to give an account of our own experience ; how we played with marbles and apples ; how we learnt the multiplication table, fractions, and proportion; how we were after- wards amused to find that common things conformed to the rules of number ; and later still how we came to see that the same laws applied to music and to mechanism, to astronomy, to chemistry, and to many otber subjects. And then, on trying to analyse our own mental processes, we find that mathematical ideas have been imbibed in precisely the same way as all other ideas, viz., by learning, by experience, and by reflexion. The ap- parent difference in the mode of first apprehending them and in their ulti- mate cogency arises frém the difference of the ideas themselves, from the pre- ponderance of quantitative over qualitative considerations in mathematics, from the notions of absolute equality and identity which they imply. If we turn to the other question, How did the world at large acquire and improve its idea of number and of figures? How can we span the interval between the savage who counted only by the help of outward objects, to whom 15 was “ half the hands and both the feet,”’ and Newton or Laplace? The answer is the history of mathematics and its successive developments, arithmetic, geometry, algebra, &c. The first and greatest step in all this was the transition from number in the concrete to number in the abstract. This was the beginning not only of mathematics but of all abstract thought. The reason and mode of it was the same as in the individual. ‘here was the same general influx of evidence, the same unsought-for experimental proof, the same recognition of general laws running through all manner of purposes and relations of life. No wonder then if, under such circumstances, mathematics, like some other subjects and perhaps with better excuse, came after a time to be clothed with mysticism; nor that, even in modern times, they should have been placed upon an a priori basis, as in the philosophy of Kant. Number was so soon found to be a principal common to many braxches of knowledge that it was readily assumed to be the key to all. It gave distinctness of expression, if not clearness of thought, to ideas which were floating in the untutored mind, and even suggested to it new conceptions. In “the one,” “the all,” ‘‘the many in one,” (terms of purely arithmetic origin,) it gave the earliest utterance to men’s first crude notions about God and the world. In “the equal,” ‘“ the solid,” “the straight,”’ and “ the crooked,” ADDRESS. 29 which still survive as figures of speech among ourselves, it supplied a voca- bulary for the moral notions of mankind, and quickened them by giving them the power of expression. In this lies the great and enduring interest in the fragments which remain to us of the Pythagorean philosophy. The consecutive processes of Mathematics led to the consecutive pro- cesses of Logic; but it was not until long after mankind had attained to abstract ideas that they attained to any clear notion of their connexion with one another. In process of time the leading ideas of Mathematies became the leading ideas of Logic. The “one” and the “ many” passed into the “‘ whole”’ and its “‘ parts;’’ and thence into the “ universal” and the ‘‘particular.’’ The fallacies of Logic, such as the well-known puzzle of Achilles and the tortoise, partake of the nature of both sciences. And perhaps the conception of the infinite and the infinitesimal, as well as of negation, may have been in early times transferred from Logic to Mathematics. But the connexion of our ideas of number is probably anterior to the connexion of any of our other ideas. And as a matter of fact, geometry and arithmetic had already made considerable progress when Aristotle invented the syllogism. General ideas there were, beside those of mathematics—true flashes of genius which saw that there must be general laws*to which the universe conforms, but which saw them only by occasional glimpses, and through the distortion of imperfect knowledge; and although the only records of them now remaining are the inadequate representations of later writers, yet we must still remember that to the existence of such ideas is due not only the conception but even the possibility of Physical Science. But. these general ideas were too wide in their grasp, and in early days at least were connected to their subjects of application by links too shadowy, to be thoroughly apprehended by most minds; and so it came to pass that one form of such an idea was taken as its only form, one application of it as the idea itself; and philosophy, unable to maintain itself at the level of ideas, fell back upon the abstractions of sense, and, by preference, upon those which were most ready to hand, namely, those of mathematics. Plato’s ideas relapsed into a doctrine of numbers ; mathematics into mys- ticism, into neo-Platonism, and the like. And so, through many long ages, through good report and evil report, mathematics have always held an unsought-for sway. It has happened to this science as to many other subjects, that its warmest adherents have not always been its best friends. Mathematics have often been brought into matters where their presence has been of doubtful utility. If they have given precision to literary style, that precision has sometimes been carried to excess, as in Spinoza and perhaps Descartes; if they have tended to clearness of expression in philosophy, that very clearness has sometimes given an appearance of finality not always true ; if they have contributed to definition in theology, that definiteness has often been fictitious, and has been attained at the cost of spiritual meaning. And, coming to recent times, although we 30 REPORT——-1878. may admire the ingenuity displayed | in the logical machines of Earl Stanhope and of Stanley Jevons, in the ‘ Formal Guaee of De Morgan, and in the ‘Calculus’ of Boole; although as fnatiemaanenne we may feel satisfaction that these feats (the possibility of which was clear @ priori) have been actually accomplished ; yet we must bear in mind that their application is really confined to cases where the subject-matter is perfectly uniform in character, and that beyond this range they are liable to encumber rather than to assist thought. Not unconnected with this intimate association of ideas and their expression is the fact that, whichever may have been cause, which- ever effect, or whether both may not in turn have acted as cause and effect, the culminating age of classic art was contemporaneous with the first great development of mathematical science. In an earlier part of this discourse I have alluded to the importance of mathematical precision recognised in the technique of art during the Cinquecento; and I have now time only to add that on looking still further back it would seem that sculpture and painting, architecture and music, nay even poetry itself, received a new, if not their first true, impulse at the period when geometric form appeared fresh chiselled by the hand of the mathematician, and when the first’ ideas of harmony and proportion rang joyously together in the morning tide of art. Whether the views on which I have here insisted be in any way novel, or whether they be merely such as from habit or from inclination are usually kept out of sight, matters little. But whichever be the case, they may still furnish a solvent of that rigid aversion which both Literature and Art are too often inclined to maintain towards Science of all kinds. It isa very old story that, to know one another better, to dwell upon similarities rather than upon diversities, are the first stages towards a better understanding between two parties ; but in few cases has it a truer application than in that here discussed. To recognise the common growth of scientific and other instincts until the time of harvest is not only conducive to a rich crop, but it is also a matter of prudence, lest in trying to root up weeds from among the wheat, we should at the same time root up that which is as valuable as wheat. When Pascal’s father had shut the door of his son’s study to mathematics, and closeted him with Latin and Greek, he found on his return that the walls were teeming with formule and figures, the more congenial product of the boy’s mind. Fortunately for the boy, and fortunately also for Science, the mathematics were not torn up, but were suffered to grow together with other subjects. And all said and done, the lad was not the worse scholar or man of letters in the end. But, truth to tell, considering the severance which still subsists in education and during our early years between Literature and Science, we can hardly wonder if when thrown together in the afterwork of life they should meet as strangers; or if the severe garb, the curious implements, and the strange wares of the latter ADDRESS. DL should seem little attractive when contrasted with the light companion- ship of the former. The day is yet young, and in the early dawn many things look weird and fantastic which in fuller light prove to be familiar and useful. The outcomings of Science, which at one time have been deemed to be but stumbling-blocks scattered in the way, may ultimately prove stepping stones which have been carefully laid to form a pathway _ over difficult places for the children of “ sweetness and of light.” The instances on which we have dwelt are only a few out of many in which Mathematics may be found ruling and governing a variety of sub- jects. It is as the supreme result of all experience, the framework in which all the varied manifestations of nature have been set, that our science has laid claim to be the arbiter of all knowledge. She does not indeed contribute elements of fact, which must be sought elsewhere; but she sifts and regulates them: she proclaims the laws to which they must conform if those elements are to issue in precise results. From the data of a problem she can infallibly extract all possible consequences, whether they be those first sought, or others not anticipated ; but she can introduce nothing which was not latent in the original statement. Mathematics cannot tell us whether there be or be not limits to time or space; but to her they are both of indefinite extent, and this in a sense which neither affirms nor denies that they are either infinite or finite. Mathematics cannot tell us whether matter be continuous or discrete in its structure ; but to her it is indifferent whether it be one or the other, and her conclu- sions are independent of either particular hypothesis. Mathematics can tell us nothing of the origin of matter, of its creation or its annihilation ; she deals only with it in a state of existence; but within that state its modes of existence may vary from our most elementary conception to our most complex experience. Mathematics can tell us nothing beyond the problems which she specifically undertakes; she will carry them to their limit, but there she stops, and upon the great region beyond she is im- perturbably silent. Conterminous with space and coéval with time is the kingdom of Mathematics; within this range her dominion is supreme; otherwise than according to her order nothing can exist; in contradiction to her laws nothing takes place. On her mysterious scroll is to be found written for those who can read it that which has been, that which is, and that which is to come. Everything material which is the subject of knowledge has number, order, or position ; and these are her first outlines for'a sketch of the universe. If our more feeble hands cannot follow out the details, still her part has been drawn with an unerring pen, and her work cannot be gainsaid. So wide is the range of mathematical science, so indefinitely may it extend beyond our actual powers of manipulation, that at some moments we are inclined to fall down with even more than reverence before her majestic presence. But so strictly limited are her promises and powers, about so much that we might wish to know does she offer no 32 REPORT—1878. information whatever, that at other moments we are fain to call her results but a vain thing, and to reject them as a stone when we had asked for bread. If one aspect of the subject encourages our hopes, so does the other tend to chasten our desires; and he is perhaps the wisest, and in the long run the happiest among his fellows, who has learnt not only this science, but also the larger lesson which it indirectly teaches, namely, to temper our aspirations to that which is possible, to moderate our desires to that which is attainable, to restrict our hopes to that of which accomplishment, if not immediately practicable, is at least distinctly within the range of conception. That which is at present beyond our ken may, at some period and in some manner as yet unknown to us, fall within our grasp; but our science teaches us, while ever yearning with Goethe for “Light, more light,” to concentrate our attention upon that of which our powers are capable, and contentedly to leave for future experience the solution of problems to which we can at present say neither yea nor nay. It is within the region thus indicated that knowledge in the true sense of the word is to be sought. Other modes of influence there are in society and in individual life, other forms of energy beside that of intellect. There is the potential energy of sympathy, the actual energy of work; there are the vicissitudes of life, the diversity of circumstance, health, and disease, and all the perplexing issues, whether for good or for evil, of impulse and of passion. But although the book of life cannot at present be read by the light of Science alone nor the wayfarers be satisfied by the few loaves of knowledge now in our hands; yet it would be difficult to overstate the almost miraculous increase which may be produced by a liberal distribution of what we already have, and by a restriction of our cravings within the limits of possibility. Tn proportion as method is better than impulse, deliberate purpose than erratic action, the clear glow of sunshine than irregular reflexion, and definite utterances than an uncertain sound ; in proportion as knowledge is better than surmise, proof than opinion; in that proportion will the mathematician value a discrimination between the certain and the uncer- tain, and a just estimate of the issues which depend upon one motive power or the other. While on the one hand he accords to his neighbours full liberty to regard the unknown in whatever way they are led by the noblest powers that they possess ; so on the other he claims an equal right to draw a clear line of demarcation between that which is a matter of knowledge, and that which is at all events something else, and to treat the one category as fairly claiming our assent, the other as open to further evidence. And yet, when he sees around him those whose aspirations are so fair, whose impulses so strong, whose receptive faculties so sensitive, as to give objective reality to what is often but a reflex from themselves, or & projected image of their own experience, he will be willing to admit that there are influences which he cannot as yet either fathom or measure, but whose operation he must recognise among the facts of our existence. P.O.CD. EAS Page 6, line 10. It is worth while to compare the following passage from Plato’s ‘ Republic,’ Book vii. (Jowett’s translation) : “ After plane geometry, we took solids in revolution instead of taking solids in themselves; whereas after the second dimension the third, which is concerned with cubes and dimensions of depth, ought to have been followed. “Tt is true, Socrates ; but these subjects seem to be as yet hardly explored. “ Why, yes, I said, and for two reasons; in the first place, no government patro- nises them, which leads to a want of energy in the study of them, and they are difficult ; in the second place, students cannot learn them unless they have a teacher. But then a teacher is hardly to be found, and even if one could be found, as matters now stand the students of these subjects, who are very conceited, would not mind him; that, however, would be otherwise if the whole state patronised and honoured them, then. they would listen, and there would be continuous and earnest search, and discoveries would be made; since even now, disregarded as they are by the world, and maimed of their fair proportions, and although none of their votaries can tell the use of them, still these studies force their way by their natural charm, and very likely they may emerge into light.” P. 11,1. 44. Compare with this the latter part of Plato's ‘ Philebus,’ on know- ledge and the handicraft arts; also Prof. Jowett’s ‘ Introduction’ thereto. P. 13,1. 40. See ‘Trattato della Pittura,’ by Leonardo da Vinci; also the ‘Memoir on the MSS. of L. d. V.,’ by Venturi, 1797. P. 14, 1. 2. ‘The Gentleman and Cabinet Maker’s Director, by Thomas Chippendale, London, 1754. -*The Cabinet Maker and Upholsterer’s Drawing Book,’ by Thomas Sheraton, London, 1793. P. 14,1. 32. See Sorby’s ‘ Address to the Microscopical Society,’ 1876. P. 14,1. 38, ‘ Phil. Trans, of the Royal Society,’ 1870, p. 333; and 1876, p. 27. P, 14,1. 42. ‘Phil. Trans.,’ 1877, p. 149. P. 15, 1.6. ‘On Attraction ard Repulsion resulting from Radiation,’ ‘ Phil. Trans.,’ 1874, p. 501; 1875, p. 519; 1876, p. 325. P. 15,1. 9. ‘ Philosophical Magazine, April, 1878. P. 15, 1. 10. ‘Philosophical Magazine, 1875, Vol. ii., pp. 337, 446: 187 Vol. i., p. 821; 1878, Vol. i., p. 161. P. 15, 1. 20. Poggendorff’s ‘ Annalen,’ Tom. xxxv., p. 337. P. 15,1. 21. ‘Royal Society’s Proceedings,’ 1878. P. 15,1. 28. The Papers on the Telephone are too numerous to specify. P. 15,1. 29. See various Papers in ‘Nature,’ and elsewhere, during the last twelve months. 1878. c 34 REPORT—1878. Page 15, line 23. ‘ Royal Society’s Proceedings,’ May 9, 1878. P. 15, 1. 33. ‘Phil. Trans.,’ Vol. 169, pp. 55 and 155, and other Papers cata- logued in the ‘ Appendix to Part II. of the Memoir.’ Page 16, line 25. See Maxwell ‘On Heat,’ chap. xxii. P.17,1.29. Grunert’s ‘Archiv,’ Vol. vi., p. 837; also separate work, Berlin, 1862. P.17, 1.31. ‘Linear Associative Algebra,’ by Benjamin Peirce, Washington City, 1870. P.18,1.10. Sir W. Thomson, ‘Cambridge Mathematical Journal,’ Vol. lii., p. 174. Jevons’ ‘ Principles of Science,’ Vol. ii., p. 438. But an explanation of the difficulty seems to me to be found in the fact that the problem, as stated, is one of. the conduction of heat, and that the “impossibility ” which attaches itself to the expression for the “time” merely means that previous to a certain epoch the conditions which gave rise to the phenomena were not those of conduction, but those of some other action of heat. If, therefore, we desire to comprise the phenomena of the earlier as well as of the later period in »ne problem we must find some more general statement, viz., that of physical conditions which at the critical epoch will issue in a case of conduction. I think that Prof. Clifford has somewhere given a similar explanation. P. 21, 1. 13. S. Newcomb ‘On Certain Transformations of Surfaces,’ ‘ American Journal of Mathematics,’ Vol. i., p. 1. P.21,1.14. Tait ‘Qn Knots,’ ‘ Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh,’ Vol. xxviii., p. 145; Klein, ‘ Mathematische Annalen,’ ix., p. 478. P. 27, 1. 18. ‘Royal Society’s Proceedings, February 5, 1876, and May 9 1878. wat P, 30, 1. 1. For example, in Herbart’s ‘ Psychologie.’ P. 30, 1. 8. A specimen will be found in the ‘ Moralia’ of Gregory the Great, Lib. I. c. xiv., of which'I quote only the arithmetical part: “ Quid in septenario numero, nisi summa perfectionis accipitur? Ut enim humans rationis causas de septenario numero taceamus, que afferunt, qudd idcirco perfectus sit, quia exprimo pari constat, et primo, impari; ex primo, qui dividi potest, et primo, qui dividi non potest; certissimé scimus, quod sep- tenarium numerum Scriptura Sacra pro perfectione ponere consuevit. ; A septenario quippe numero in duodenarium surgitur. Nam septenarius suis in se partibus multiplicatus, ad duodenarium tenditur. Sive enim quatuor per tria, sive per quatuor tria ducantur, septem in duodecim vertuntur... . Jam superiis dictum est quéd in quinquagenario numero, qui septem hebdomadibus ac monade addit4 impletur, requies designatur; denario autem numero summa per- fectionis exprimetur.” P. 30, 1.16. Approximate dates B.C. of— Cb | Sculptors, Painters, and Poets. Mathematicians. Stesichorus, 600. Thales, 600. Pindar, 522-442, Pythagoras, 550. AMschylus, 500-450. Anaxagoras, 500-450. Sophocles, 495-400, Hippocrates, 460. Euripides, 480-400. Phidias, 488-432. Praxiteles, 450-400, Theeetetus, 440. Zeuxis, 400. Archytas, 400. Apelles, 300. Scopas, 350, Euclid, 323-283. REPORTS ON THE STATE OF SCIENCH. REPORTS ON THE STATE OF SCIENCE. Catalogue of the Oscillation-frequencies of Solar Rays ; drawn up under the superintendence of a Committee of the British Association, consist- ing of Dr. Hueains (Chairman), Dr. De La Ruz, Mr. J. Norman Lockyer, Dr. J. Emerson Reynoxps, Mr. Srorriswoopr, Dr. W. MarsHatt Warts, and Mr. G. Jounstonz Stoney (feporter) *. Every periodic disturbance of the ether which can be propagated through it as an undulation may be represented mathematically by one or more terms of the harmonic expansion known as Fouricr’s series. A single term of this series suffices to represent the undulation when the waves are of that simplest type which can be represented by a curve of sines—the curve which represents the small oscillations of a pendulum. But when the waves are of a more complicated form, two or more terms, perhaps all the terms, of the series must be retained in order to represent it; and in such cases the terms of the series which remain severally represent the simple sinusoid or pendulous undulations, which, if made to coexist in the medium by being piled on one another, would become identical with the actual complex undu- lation which is present in it. The non-periodic disturbances which traverse a medium are of two kinds— those which, like the clang of a bell, may be represented by a series consisting of sinusoid terms with distinct periodic times, though in this case not . harmonically, or at least not all harmonically, related; and those which can be decomposed into sinusoid elements only under the condition that the elementary undulations have periodic times which pass without hiatus into one another. Now so long as light is propagated through what is called a vacuum, the undulation, however complex, maintains its form unaltered at all distances from the source of light; for in vacuous spaces waves of different periods advance at the same rate and directly forwards, and therefore the simple comporent undulations which are represented by the several terms of a * A Map of Oscillation-frequencies is in preparation, and will be presented to the British Association at the Meeting at Sheffield in 1879. 38 REPORT—1878. sinusoid series accurately accompany each other throughout their whole journey. But the event is different if the light encounters an optical agent which acts differently on waves of different periods. Of this kind are the prisms and diffraction-gratings of our spectroscopes. Here Nature herself effects the decomposition which is indicated by the theory. Waves of different periods are compelled to travel in different directions, and thus the several terms of the sinusoid series appear under the form of lines in the spectrum. The wave-lengths corresponding to each position in the spectrum have been determined with great care, and these when corrected for the dispersion of the air are proportional to the corresponding periodic times, which thus become known. Moreover, the intensities of the lines may be observed, and will give the coefficients to be applied to the corresponding terms of the sinusoid series. Hence by a discussion of the observations we may expect to learn much with regard to the original disturbance caused by the source of light. Non-periodic disturbances of the second class will be indicated by continuous spectra, while the other two classes of disturbances will be dis- tinguished by spectra which consist of separate rays; and a careful study of the positions and intensities of the rays may give valuable information as to the periodic time, and sometimes even as to the particular form of the original disturbance. Hence in the present state of science it is of importance to facilitate this inquiry as much as possible; and it is hoped that aid will be given to the student of nature by the Table now published, in which the oscillation- frequencies of the principal,rays of the visible part of the solar spectrum have been computed from Angstrém’s admirable determinations of their wave-lengths in air, combined with Ketteler’s observations on the dispersion of air. Such a table and its accompanying map afford the most assistance that can be given towards the detection of harmonic relations; for rays that are harmonically related are therein represented in the simplest form that is practicable—in the Table by an arithmetic series of the same type as the series of natural numbers, where the common difference is equal to the first term ; and in the Map by a series of equidistant lines. While this theoretic advantage has been the guiding aim of the Committee, they have also kept constantly in view the convenience of observers. A map of Oscillation-frequencies offers peculiar facilities for this, as its red end is less extended when compared with its blue end than in Angstrim’s map and more extended than in Kirchhoft’s. It thus delineates the spectrum with an appearance intermediate between that of a diffraction spectrum and that of a prismatic spectrum, and does not distort either spectrum too much for practical use. It may thus be employed without inconvenience by observers with either of the two great classes of spectroscope. ‘The Committee are - accordingly occupied in preparing such a Map to accompany the Table. The Committee ,were of opinion that it would prove a boon to observers to have Kirchhoff’s, Angstrom’s, and the new numbers in reference to each ray brought together in one horizontal line. Before this,could be accomplished it was necessary to make a systematic comparison of Angstrém’s numbers and maps with Kirchhoff’s, and of both with the actual solar spectrum, in order to identify the rays wherever practicable. The Committee therefore felt that it was desirable that this work should be undertaken ; and it has been satisfactorily accomplished by Charles EK. Burton, Esq., B.A., F.R.A.S., who has made all observations and computations required by the Committee. He has, moreover, inserted (in brackets) in column 2 the OSCILLATION-FREQUENCIES OF SOLAR RAYS. 39 wave-lengths of those rays of Kirchhoff’s list which are not found in Ang- strém’s, wherever it appeared .possible to make the interpolation with safety. The small corrections which Angstrém indicates at p. 29 of his memoir (‘Le Spectre Normal du Soleil’) haye been applied to his numbers before insert- ing them incolumn 2. Accordingly the numbers of this column which are not in brackets represent Angstrém’s work in its finished state. In column 6 the intensities and widths which Kirchhoff assigns to rays between A and G have been reproduced; and Mr. Burton has continued these determinations to all the rays recorded by Angstrém between G and H, so that they now cover the whole spectrum from Ato H. Before entering on this work Mr. Burton prepared himself by a revision of portions of the spec- trum which Kirchhoff had delineated, so as to ensure that he should employ Karchhoff’s symbols in the same sense in which they had been used by Kirch- hoff and his assistant Hofmann. And in the last column Mr. Burton has thrown the solar rays into such groups as appeared to him to be the most convenient to an observer. It will probably be possible to improve this part of the work, if a second edition of the Catalogue is called for. - In columns 3 and 4 are given the steps by which the oscillation-frequencies of the rays have been computed from their wave-lengths, in order that it may be easy to revise the former if improyements are at any time made upon Angstrém’s table of waye-lengihs, or on the values for the refraction of air which have been used. The Map which the Committee are engaged in preparing will be a mere chart, in which the intensities of the rays will be indicated by lines of diffe- rent lengths. It does not appear to the Committee to be desirable that they should attempt a finished drawing of the Solar Spectrum in the present state of spectroscopic science, in which observers may hope soon to have in their hands good photographs of every part of the visible spectrum. In order meanwhile to supply as far as possible the place of a more finished map, tables will be appended which will enable any one who possesses Kirchhoft’s exquisite map or Angstrém’s to place upon them the outlines of a scale of oscillation-frequencies, so as to make these maps in a large degree available. The Committee will feel obliged to any spectroscopists who are so good as to send to G. Johnstone Stoney, 3 Palmerston Park, Dublin, such corrections of the present tables as may occur to them, with a view to their insertion in future editions, Caratocur of the principal Dark Rays of the visible part of the Solar Spec- trum, containing all the rays registered by KincuHorr and Anestrim, arran nged on a scale of OscILLATION-FREQUENCIES. EXPLANATION. Column 1 gives the position on the Arbitrary Scale attached to Kirchhoff’s maps. Column 2 reproduces the wave- lengths i in tenth-metres as determined by Angstrom, after applying to the numbers of Angstrém’ 8 list the small corrections which he indicates at p. 29 of his memoir, “Le Spectre,Normal du Soleil.” The wave-lengths of rays recorded by Kirchhoff, but not by Angstrém, have been introduced within brackets | ee | | | Be 4 7274: 4 40 REPORT—1878. into this column wherever it appeared that the interpolation could be made with sufficient safety. The wave-lengths of this list are wave-lengths in air of 760 millims. pressure at Upsala and 16° C. temperature. Column 8 contains the reciprocals of the numbers in column 2, each multiplied by 107. Each number in this column may accordingly be regarded either as the number of times that the corresponding wave-length-in-air goes into one millimetre, or as the number of complete oscillations in the time yr, where p is the index of refraction of air for that ray. Column 4 contains the correction for the dispersion of air of 760 millims. pressure and 16° temperature, deduced from Ketteler’s observations. (See ‘ Philosophical Maga- zine’ for 1866, vol. ii. p. 336.) Column 5 gives the oscILLATION-FREQUENCY of each ray in the time r, the time that light takes to advance one millimetre iz vacuo. Or the numbers of this column may be regarded as the numbers of waves per millimetre in vacuo. Column 6 indicates the intensity and width of each ray between A and G, as determined by Kirchhoff, and between G and H.,, as determined by Mr. Burton, 6 being the most intense and g being very wide, viz. about 0:15 of one degree of the scale of oscillation-frequencies. Column 7 enumerates the substances which have been found to emit bright rays coincident with dark solar rays, and contains some other remarks, Column 8. In the last column the rays are bracketed into the groups which strike the eye in looking at the spectrum, and to each group is assigned a number which suffi- ciently indicates its position upon the standard scale. ° Cor- {Position on fia pak Oscillation-| Inten- Groups we chhoff’s| Strém’s | Reci- | for the frequency | sity (aes | Arbitrary wave- | procals. |disper-| in the and Origin, &e. of Scale. lengths sion of| timer. | width. in air. the air. | 7604-0 131510 | 0°36 1314°74 |... Wa yee | 73151 67°03 | 0°38 | 1366°65 ) Kirchhoff records 57 rays £ : : less refrangible than 1807-4 6548) » 1368110 | 480'1 (see Appendix 7300:4 69°79 | 5, 1369-41 | ‘ T.), but none of them 7289°7 7180 | ,, 1371-42 | a ae pick 72857 72°55 a 137217 ) Angstré roms. 74°68 | ,, 137430 | 6e 753 a 13749 4d 7701 | 45 137663 | 4c 173 i 13769 2d Ee 13773 | 4d 4804 |(7271°3) 4812 72621 482°: | (7260°5) 483°3 in 3) 4841 | 72569 | 78:00] ,, 137762 | 2d 48571 cra88 Borate ithe, 13783 | 3d 4362 | 7249°5 | 79°40] 5, 137902 | Ge ek (7248'3) | 79°6 | » 13792 | 2¢ 488°2 to (7214:6) 7213-4 (7208°5) (7207-5) 72046 OSCILLATION-FREQUENCIES OF SOLAR RAYS. 41 Reci- procals. 1380°85 81°69 83°07 84°12 85°06 86'1 86°31 87°3 87°4 88:00 7202'5 7198-1 7195°6 (7191:8) 7191-0 7189°3 7184°7 7182°5 7179-2 7175°7 (7175:0) (71433) 7713 (71645) 7163:0 7160-2 (7156-4) (7148-7) 7146-0 |(7133:3) (7125°3) (7116-9) (70886) (7085-0) 88-41 89°25 89°74 9°°5 90°63 90°96 9185 92°27 92°91 93°59 93°7 93°9 94°45 95°8 96°06 96°61 974 93°9 1399°38 1401°9 03°5 O5'I 10°7 11"4 CaTALOGUE (continued). Reduc- tion to va- cuum. 0°38 Frequency. 1380°47 1381°31 1382°69 138374 138468 13857 138593 1386°9 13870 1387-62 1388°03 138887 1389:36 139071 139025 1390758 139147 139188 1392°52 1393°20 13933 1393°5 1394-06 1395-4 1395°67 139622 13970 13985 1398°99 14015 1403'1 1404°7 14103 14110 Origin, &e. Groups. Group 1392 (the a Group). Strong. Sa | 42 Kirchhoff. 532°38 5369 5373 540°6 5411 542°0 543°6 5446 547°0 547°9 549°6 5 51 ya 552°5 553°8 ee 5546 ° A neg- strom. (7075'8) (7061°3) (7059'9) 70479 (70456) (7041-4) 7034-0 (70313) 70250 70216 7014-2 7009°0 7003-4 (6998:3) 6997°5 (6995-0) 6992°5 6987-2 6984°3 (6981:8) (6980:1) (6973-4) 6969°5 (6965-7) 6964°3 (6961'5) 6962°3 6959°7 6957°5 6954-7 6951-7 69493 6945'8 6941°7 6940°5 69286 6936-4 REPORT—1878. CaraLocuE (continued). Reduc- Inten- ae Ge Frequency. end cuum. width. 14133 | 0°39 | 14129 1b 16°2 ” 14158 2b 16°5 ” 141611 1b 18°36 | _,, 1418-47 | 3b 193 3 14189 2¢ 20°2 44 1419:8 la EOP css 1421-28 | 4b 22°2 5 14218 3d 23°49 | 55 142310 | 4¢ 2418 | ,, 1423°79 | 2b Das | 142529 | 3e 26°74. | 0°39 142635 | 3c 27°88 | ogo | 142748] 3c 28°9 = 1428°5 le 29°08 | ,, 142868 | 3b 29°6 = 1429-2 2b go1° | ,, 1429770 gig 3 1430°79 ee 31°78 | 4, 143138 | la 32°3 5, 14319 2b 32°6 $ 14322 lb | 34°0 ss 1433°6 le 34°82 | ,, 143442 | ... 35°6 . 14352 1b 35°89 | ,, 1438549 | ... 36°5 i 14361 3b 36-31 | , | 148591 | :.. 36°34 | ,, 1438644 | 2e B7ise ||. (> 143690 |... 37°38 |, 143748 | 4c EES || eae 143810} 2c 38°99 | ,, 1438°59 | 2c ws “ae 2b 3972 | » | 143932] 3b 40°57 | 5 144017 ab gos? | ,, | 1440-42 2b 4r2t i 144081 Bie 4167 |, 1441:27 | 2b Origin, &e. Groups. Winged ray. Kirchhoff. 572°2 572°9 573°6 5744 5751 576°6 5781 579°6 5811 582°5 583°8 5850 5862 587°0 587°9 5890 5894 589°9 59°°3 59°°7 5911 591°5 591°9 592°3 592°7 ee: 595°0 5966 597°4 601'2 601°8 602°8 606'0 608°3 612°4 6134 ° Ang- strom. 6932-1 (6930-0) 6927-9 (6926-0) 6922-4 6899-0 (6895-0) 6891-4 6888'3 68850 6882°6 68785 68762 (6875:0) (6874-0) (6873-0) (6872:0) 6871-0 6869°9 68671 (6866:2) (6861-8) (6858:1) 68563 (6843'8) (68418) (6838°5) 6828-0 6819-0 (6806:3) (6803'1) 6788°7 OSCILLATION-FREQUENCIES OF SOLAR RAYS, Reci- procals. 1442°56 430 43°44 43°8 44°59 45°69 46°74 47°64 48°60 49°48 50°3 51°08 51°74 52°43 5294 53°80 54°29 54°5 54°8 ee 552 55°39 55°62 CaTaLoGuE (continued). 43 Reduc- tion to ya- cuum, 040 Frequency. 1442:16 14426 1443°04 1443'4 144419 144529 144634 1447-24 1448-20 1449°08 14499 1450°68 145134 145203 145254 1453:40 1453'89 14541 1454-4 14546 1454'8 145499 145522 145582 14560 1456°9 14577 145811 14608 14612 1461°9 1464-15 1466.08 14683 1469°5 1472°63 Tnten- sity and width. | Origin, &e. Groups. 3b 1b 3c | 1b | 24 | 2a | icicle | Group 1450 (the B Group). Very strong ; | atmospheric. | | | Group 1466, Faint. 44, REPORT—1878. CaTALOGuE (continued). i. b Redue- Inten- Kirchhoff. ba j eat 12 a8 Frequency. se Origin, &e. Groups. cuum. width. 623°4 | (67719) | 1476-7 | oq | 14763 1b 6261 6763'5 78°52 | 5 147811} 1b 6314 |(6761°9)| 789 | » 14785 | 1b ate 67612 afeheky Ith 147862 | ... 6384 | 6726°5 86°66 | ,, 1486:25 | 1b |Ca. 639°8 |(6721-:0)| 87°9 * 14875 1b 6410 671716] 88:72] ,, 1488°31 | 2b | Ca. on 6713°8 8947 | » 1489:06 |... 645°3 |(6704'5)| t's ¥ 14911 Ib 6703:0 91°87 . 1491:46 , 67010 | 92°31 | 041 | 149190] ... 648°1 aoe ie ne oe 1b 654°3 | 6677°6 | 1497°54 | 0742 | 149712 | 2b 659°3 6663'1 | 1500°80 | ,, 1500°38 | 2a | Fe. -- | 6659°9 ] ors2 | » | 15010] --- | / Taentification of Ang: 665°7 6643:1 05°32 ss 150490 | 2a strom’s ray with Kireh- 669'5 6633°3 07°54 |» 150712 | 2b hoff’s doubtful. 678°6 6604-1 14°21 = 1513°79 1b | Fe. 68174 6597°6 T5770) || 55 1515-28 | la | 6828 | 65933 | 1669] ,, 151627 | 1b 6831 | 65926 16°85 | 5, 151643 | 2a | Fe. 685°3 6585'9. 18°39 | 4, 151797 | Ib 6580°6 19°62 | ,, 1519°20 689°8 6574-0 2114 | 4, 152072 | 2b | Fe. | 690°9 =|: 6571-4 20-75) iss 152133 | la 6921 | 65679 | 22°56] ,, 152214 | 2a 693°4 to } eee eee see eee 1 | 694"1 .~ | 6562:10] 23°90] 5, 1523°48 oe C, H, Air. to eos se eee eee | 6559°'79| 24°44] 5 152402 | ... 6558°42| 24°75 | 5 152433 | ... 6557°58| 24°95 |» 1524:53 6556719| 25:27 | ,, 152485 a! 6551°78| 2630] ,, 152588 | ... 6981 | 6550:07| 2670] ,, 1526:28 | 2a 7oo'o §=«| 6547-86] 27:22] ,, 152680 | 2a 7or'l 654540} 27°79 | 5, 1527°37 | 2b | Fe. 7021 6543:23| 28:29 | ,, 152787 Qa OSCILLATION-FREQUENCIES OF SOLAR RAYS. 45 CarALoevur (continued). 6 _ |Redue- Tnten- Kirchhoff. hl ool age Frequency. a Origin, &c. Groups. cuum. width. 702°6 6541-45 | 1528°71 | o-g2 1528:29 | 1b aoe 653623] 29°93 5 1529°51 ae 795°5 | 653322] 30°64] ,, 1530-22 | 2a 705°9 6531-74! 30°98 | _,, 1530°56 | 2a 7°7°5 |(6526°6)| 322 | o42 | 15318 1b 708°6 =| 6523:14| 33°00 | 043 | 153257 | 2b F10°5 6518°55|. 34°08 | ,, 1533°65 2e ss GoN7-5O9)|) ga-3r |< ., 153388 |... 7114 | 6515°80| 34°73 | ,, 153430 | 3c 7iz0 «| 6514-17) 3511 |, 153468 | 2p 7132 |(6512:9)| 3574 s 1535:0 1b 7144 | 6511-64} 35:71 |_, 153528 | 1e 6501-79 | - 38:04 | ,, 153761 7178 _ | 6498-25] 3888] ,, | 1538-45|-2b | Ca. Group 1539. ag } 6496°31| 3934} ,, | 153891] 2 |Ba, Barre. 719°6 Hors See fe $5c 3a Re 6495:12| 39°62 | ,, 1539:19 |... a 649418| 3984] ,, 1539-41 | ... | Fe. ae 6493-00] 4or12 | _,, 153969 |... 720°1 6492-41} 40°26 | ,, 1539°83 | 2e |Ca. 7201 6490:07| 40°81 | _,, 1539°38 | 2b | Fe. 648868} 41°14] _,, 1540°71 723°7 | 6482-79) 42°55] ,, 154212 | 2c |Appearsto be the mean off 7242 6481:18} 42°93] ,, 154250 | 1b Eras 725°% 647901} 43:45] ,, 154302 | 1b | Air. 7267 | 647485| 4444 |_,, 1544:01] 3c 7278 6471°85| 4515] ,, 154472 | le 7280 =| (6471:3)| 4573 > 1544:9 2a =ae 647075) 4542] ,, 154499 | ... 729° | 6468°78| 4589] ,, 154546 | 2b | Ca. 6467:14| 4628] ,, 154585 Pe 6463°74| 47°09 | ,, 154666 | ... 7317 646198) 47°51 - 1547-08 | 5b | Ca, Fe. fe 645409] 4940] ,, 1548:97 |... 7369 | 6449-27) sos6 | ,, 155013 | 3b | Ca. 740°9 | 643835] 53:19 | ,, 1552°76 | 5b | Ca, Cd. 743°7 | 6431°73| 54:79] ,, 1554:36 | 2b 46 REPORT— 1878. CATALOGUE (continued). A |Reduc- Inten- : Ang- Reci- tion to sit od Kirchhoff. ne procals.| va- |Frequency. ath Origin, &e. Groups. cuum, width. 7443 6480-12 | 1555718 | 0°43 1554-75 | 4b | Fe. 7481 | 642063] 57:48 | ,, 1557-05 | 4b | Fe. Group 1560. 7487 | 641917! 57°83! . | 1557-40 | 3b Strong. 750°1 641590} 5863) ,, 1558:20 | la 751'0 641410) 59706 | ,, 155863 | Ib 752°3 641062] 5991 | ,, 1559-48 | 4b | Fe. 7538 6407°38| 6070] , 1560°27 | 3b /|Sr, Fe. 7569 | 639928} 62°68) ,, | 1562:25| 5b |Fe. 7593 6392-87] 64:24 | 0°43 156381 | 3b | Fe. 7642 6379°99| 67:40 | 0744 | 156690 | la 637758| 6799 | » | 156755 | --- | ae 636449} 7122] 4 1570-78 | --- 7718 | 6861-41} 7198 |, 157154 | la | Zn. 7734 6357°92| 71:84] ,, 157140 | 2b | Fe. 7748 | 635428) 73°74] 5, 157330 | 2b | Fe. 7738°3 6346°34| 75-71 | ;, 157527 | 1b | Ru,Ir. 779°5 | 634340} 7644] 5, 157600 | 1b | | r8xig) Gass 20 77273 | is, 1577-29 | 3b 7831 | 63386:16| 7824] ,, 1577:30 | 4b | Fe. 7838 | 6334:54| 7865] ,, 1578:21 | 3b |Fe. 786°8 |(6827:0)| 8o°5 ” 1580:1 la 7889 | 6321-81) 81°83] ,, 1581:39 | 3b | Fe. 791°C 631841] 82°68 | ,, 1582°24 | 1d |Fe. 7914 6317:17 82°99 | ,, 1582.55 3b 7929 | 631418] 83°74] ,, 1583:30 | 2d |Fe. 794°5 6309:78} 84°84] ,, 158440 | 1d 7981 6301:88| 86383] ,, 1586: 3a 7985 | 6301:03| 87:04 | ,, 158660 | 4a | Fe. 7998 | 629874] 87-62 | ,, 1587-18 | 2b | Fe. 8003 | 6296-95| 88-07 | _,, 1587°63 | 2b | 801°5 25¢ Ss 3; set la Sora, | 6294:27| 8878! ,, 158834 | la 802°7 6291°78| 8938 | ,, 1588-94 | lb 803°5 | 629031] 8975] ,, 1589731 | 2a ... | 628669| go66| ,, | 1590-22] ... 805°8 284:99| grog | ,, 1590°65 | lb 807°4 6281°81| 91°89] ,, 159145 | 2b Group 1592. 8082 | 6279°79| 9241 | ,, 1591:97 | 2e Strong. —— a nEEaeEanD Ang- strom. 6278°47 6277-09 6276°32 6270:16 6269°35 626431 6262°68 6260°37 6257-84 6255°51 6253'40 6251-76 6246°55 6245°62 6243-49 6242-60 6240°51 6239-42 6237:55 6237-09 6236°33 6231-72 6229-91 622835 6225-62 9222'57 6221-10 6218-46 6215-67 6214-30 6212-55 6199°85 6190-71 (6188:3) 6187-26 6179-46 OSCILLATION-FREQUENCIES OF SOLAR RAYS. CaTALOGUE (continued). Reduc- Inten- Reci- jtion to sity procals.| ya- [Frequency.) ong cuum. width. 1592°74 | 0°44 | 159230] le 93°09 ” 1592°65 3b | Au. 93°29 | » 1592°85 | 2d 94°86 | ,, 159442 | la | 95°06 | 5, 159462 | 2a 96°34. | » 1595:90 | 4b | Fe. 96°76 | ,, 1596:32 | ... | 97°35 | 9 159691 | 2b | Ti. 98'00 | ,, 159756 | 3c 98°59 | 5 159815 | 4b | Fe. 99°13 | 1 159869 | 4b | Fe. 159955 | 95 159911 | 4b | Fe. 1600°88 | ,, 1600-44 | 1a Fe. orrz | 0°44 | 160068} 4b | Fe. 0167 | o'45 | 160122 | 1a |\ orgo| ,, | 160145 | ... || 02°43 |» 1601:98 |... 02°71 | 5, 160226 | .. |b OseTO™ |e, 1602°74 03°31 | 5, 1602°86 f o351| ,, | 160306 | 2a |) 04°69 | ,; 160424 | 3b | Fe. SPR Hs 1604:71 | 4c | Fe. 05°56 | ,, 160511 | 1b 06°26 aa 1605:81 07°05 | 5, 1606:60 07°43 | os 160698 | ... ofr |, 160766 | 2b | Ti. 08°83 | _,, 160838 | 1b O99 | 5s 160874 | 2b | Ti. 09°64. ” 160919 2b | Fe. 12°94 ” 1612°49 2b | Fe. 15°32 | 1 1614:87 | 3c | Fe. 159 | 1615°4 la 1622 | , | 161577 | la 18°26 | ,, 161781 | 2a | Fe. Origin, &e. Two other rays of Kirch- hoff’s lie within this space, viz. 8264 (2a), and 827°6 (1a). Group 1604. 47 Groups. Group 1597. Strong. Strong. 48 REPORT—1878. CataLoGuE (continued). ° Kirchhoff. Ang- strom. $56°8 | 617595 85775 | 617451 858-3 | 6172-49 859°7 6169-59 8602 | 6168-48 8616 | 6165°62 8622 |(6165'0) 8632 | 6163:95 863°9 =| 6162°69 8644 | 6161-40 6160-23 8662 | 6156-90 8671 | (6155'3) 8676 | 6154-41 6153°89 6153-33 8692 | 6150:68 870°9 6148-28 871°4 | 6146-76 872°5 6144:09 $74°0 | (6141-4) 874°3 6140°81 ies 6136°32 8765 | 6136-82 877°0 6135°82 879°8 | 6130-59 880'9 6128-61 881°6 | 6127-00 88276 | 6125-29 883:2 | 6123-92 884°9 | 6121:34 ah 6118°93 88777 | 6115°51 8902 | 6110-11 891°7 6107°36 6104°58 Reci- procals. 1619°19 19°56 20°09 20°85 21°14 21°90 22°1 22°34 22°67 23°01 23°32 24°19 24°6 24°85 Reduc- tion to va- cuum, 0°45 Frequency. 1618-74 1619:11 1619°64 1621-45 1621-6 1621'89 1622:22 1622°56 1622°87 1623°74 16241 1624:40 1624:54 162469 1625'39 1626°02 1626°37 162713 16278 1628-00 1629:19 1629°06 1629°32 1630°71 163124 1631°67 1632:18 1632-49 1633:18 1633°82 163474 1636:17 1636°91 1637-65 Inten- sity and width. Origin, &c. Ni. Ca. Na. doubtful. Na. Fe. Ba. Fe. Ca, Co. Identification of Angstrom’s ray with Kirchhoff’s Groups. Group 1621. Strong. Group 1628. Strong. ° Kirchho | “8 894°9 896'1 896-7 898-9 899°1 "goo'2 gor: go1'6 9024 9031 -903°6 — 904'6 » go6'r gi2"I 9163 923°0 929°5 931°3 932°5 933°3 935° 936°7 9374 940° 940°4 943°4 94.6°6 947°° 949°4 949°8 951°7 952°9 954°3 strom. 6101-92 6099-08 609766 6095:20 6094-02 6092-42 609059 6088-42 6086-69 (6085:1) 6083-27 6082-10 (6080-4) 6077-80 607587 6064-70 6055-29 6053-28 6041-37 6026-14 | 6023-16 6020-91 6019:33 6015'81 6012°68 6011-42 6007-65 (6007-2) 6002-25 5997-08 5996-44 (59956) 5990-20 5939-89 5988-10 5986-35 5984-35 , OSCILLATION-FREQUENCIES OF SOLAR RAYS. 49 CaTALoGuE (continued). Reci- procals. 1638°83 39°59 39°97 40°63 40°95 41°38 41°38 42°46 42°93 434 43°85 44°17 44°6 45°33 45°85 48°89 51°45 52°00 S525 59°44 60°26 60°88 61°31 62°29 63°15 63°50 64°54 64°7 66°04. 67°48 67°66 67°9 69°39 69°48 69°98 79°47 71°02 Reduc- tion Lo va- cuum, 0°46 Inten- sity Frequency.) and width. 163837 | 2e 163913 | la 163951 lb 164017 la 1640°49 la 1640'92 la 1641:42 fac 164200 | la 164247 | la 1642°9 la 1643:39 | la 1643°71 | la 16441 la 164487 | 2c 1645:39 a 1648:43 | 3b 1650:99 2b 1651:54 | ... 165479 | 2b 1658-98 | 2b 1659°80 | +b 166042 | +b 1660'85 | 4¢ 1661-83 | +> 166269 | 4b 1663-04 1b 1664.08 | 3b 16642 | 3b 166558 | 3b 166702 | 3b 1667-20 | la 1667-4 1b 1668:93 | 1b 1669-02 Wes 1669°52 | 1e 167001 | 3b 167056 | 3b Origin, &e. Groups. Ca, Li. Identification on Kirch- hoff’s map doubtful. Ti. | Identification on Kirch- j hoff’s map doubtful. Ti. Fe. Fe, Ti. Fe. Group 1666. Fe. Strong. Fe. fe} Kirchhoff. ee, : 9548 | 5983-01 see 5977-27 958°38 | 597623 959°6 597479 961°9 5970°44 = 5969-22 963°7 5967°35 96474 | (5965:9) 5963°52 ee 5961-67 968°7 5957°22 969'0 =| (5956-2) 969°6 5955°63 970°5 5953-90 9715 5951-96 972'1 5950-41 97371 5948-44 973'5 5947-62 974°3 5945-97 975°0 5944-98 “dt 5943°62 9768 5941-71 97774 | (5940°9) 977°7 5940-43 97971 5937-44 593505 iis 5934-03 982°0 5931-76 98273 593118 983°0 5929°46 984°5 5927°37 986°3 5924-02 986-7 5922:99 9874. | 5921-69 xe 5920°87 988'9 5919-09 98972 | (5918-4) REPORT—1878. CaraLoguxE (continued). Reci- procals. 1671°40 73°00 73°39 73°79 74°92 75°26 75°79 76°2 76°86 77°38 78°63 78°9 79°08 19°57 80°12 80°56 Sr11 81°35 81°81 82°09 82°48 33°02 83°2 83°38 84°23 84°91 85°20 85°84 86:00 86°49 87°09 88°04 88°34 88-71 88°94 89°45 89°6 Groups. |Redue- Inten- Pee Frequency. a Origin, &e. cuum. width. 046 | 167094 | 3b | Fe. O'">47 1672°53 “Be ele 9 1672°83 | 3b | Fe. 9 1673-23 | 3b | Fe. 49 167445 | la ” 1674-79 | ... 9 167532 | le 9 16757 le ” 1676°39 ” 167691 | ... 3 167816 | 2a ” 16784 2a ” 167861 | 3a » 167910 | 1b » 1679°65 | 2e |Ti. 9 168009 | 1b » 168064 | 38a 5 168088 | 3a | Fe. » 168134 | 2a » 168162 | 2a x. 1682°01 | ... - 1682°55 | 3a ” 1682°7 Qa » 168291 | 2a i 1683:'76 | 1b Two other rays of if 1684-44 | Kirchhoff s lie in this interval, viz. ” 168473 | ... |Fe. | 80:8 (la) and 4 1685°37 | la ) 981-2 (3b). ” 168553 | 2a ” 168602 | 3c | Fe. » | 168662) Be | Nctre map doubt ”? 3 a 09 1687°87 | 2c 9 168824 | 1b » 1688-47 |... ” 168898 | 2a ” 1689:1 2a | Kirchhoff. | 989°6 | g9g90°8 9912 991-9 9924. = 993°9 | 994°3 99570 9972 9981 998-9 999°2 1000°0 Soa | 1000"4 _ 100174 at \J ee ~ 1002°8 ee ed OSCILLATION-FREQUENCIES OF SOLAR RAYS, CATALOGUE (continued). p Reduc- Inten- Ang- Reci- | tion to sity strém. | procals.| va- |Freduemey-| and cuum. width. 5917°51 | 1689°90 | o47 | 168943 | 2a 591460} 90°73 | _,, 1690°26 | 2a (5914-1) |} — go-g ” 1690°4 la 591330] gt10 | ,, 1690°63 | 3b 5912:09| 91-45] ,, 1690°98 | la 5909-72] 9213] ,, 169166 | 1b 5908:13| 92-53 | _,, 169211} 1b 5907:25| 92°84 | ,, 1692°37 | la 590456) 93°61] ,, 169314 | 2b 5902°77| 94:12] ,, 169365 | la 590144} 94°50 | ,, 1694:03 | la 5900°52| 94°76] ,, 169429 | la 589910} 9517] ,, 169470 | la 5898°09| 9546] ,, 169499 | la 5897-40) 95°66] ,, 1695:19| ... 5897-08] 95°75 | . 1695:28 | la 589553} 96:20] ,, 1695°73 5895713} 96°31 | _,, 1695:84 | 6b 5895°04| 96°34 | _,, 169587 5892:50| 97°07] 5 1696°60 | ... 589210} 97°19 | ,, 169672 | 2b S891:56) 97°34. 1. 4 1696:87 589078} 97°57] 5 1697:10 |... 5889°12| 98:05 | _,, 169758 | 6b 5886°69| 98:75 | _,, 1698°28 5885:29} 9915] ,, 169868 | ... 588319] 99°77] 4, 1699:30 | 3a 5882°71] 1699°90 | _,, 1699-43 5880-22] 1700°62 | ,, 1700:15 5879°15} 00°93] ,, 1700°46 |... 5865-47] 04°89 | _,, 170442 | la 5863'34| 05:51 | 0-47 | 1705-04 5861-56] 06:03 | 048 | 170555] 3a 585868} 06°87] ,, 1706°39 | 2a 585660} 07°47 | ,, 1706:99 | 3c 5855°38| 07°83] ,, 1707°35 ————_ Fe, Ni. Origin, &e. D,, Na. Fe. Group 1697 (theD Group). Group 1706, Strong. Groups. Group 1719, Faint. Group 1722, | ‘aint, Group 1725, Faint. 52 REPORT—1878. CaTALOGuE (continued), 4 Reduc- Inten- Kirchhoff. ee ote ge ae Frequency. ae Origin, &e. ar) see cuum.| width. pa ees = 5854-53 | 1708°08 | 0°48 1707-60 Pet 1031°8 5852°84| 08:57 | ,, 1708:09 | 2a | Ba. 5 1032°8 585148) 08:97 | ,, 170849 | la Aap 035°. | 5847°50/ 1013 | ,, | 170965) 1 | { Tpmetication on iGeb- 5846-41 10°45 “A 1709-97 5832°63| 14°49 | ,, 171401 5821°85 17°67 ae 1717-19 1058°0 581566} 19°49] ,, 171901 | 2b |Fe. pf 5813-28] 20:20] ,, 1719°72 106370 | 580848} 21°62] ,, 1721:14 | 2b |Fe. 5807°30| 21°97 | ,, 1721°49 arc 1065'0 =| 5805°96| 22°37] ,, 172189 | 2b 1066°0 5804:57| 22°78 | ,, 172230 | la 1067'0 =| 580364] 23:06] ,, 1722°58 | 2b | Fe. 1070°5 =| 5797:39| 24:91 | ,, 172443 | 2b | Fe. .. | 579652| 2517| , | 172469] ... 107375 | S79S:17| 26:17 | ,, 172569 | la 1074'2 | 579240) 26-40] ,, 172592 | la 107575 | 5790°30) 27°03] ,, 1726°55 | 3a | Fe. oe aie Ten Identification of Ang- 1077°5 | 5787-07| 27°99 | » 1727°51 | la strém’s ray with Kirch- hoff’s doubtful. to | 5784:79| 28:67 | ,, 1728:19 |} 1 1079°7 1080°3 |(5783°7) | 290 is 1728°5 la 1080'9 5782-80} 2927] ,, 172879 | la 1081°8 5781:39| 29°69 | ,, 1729:21 | 2b |Cu. 108370 BW994) Boxe ||) 5, 1729°64 | 2a | Ba. | 5777-60] 30°82 1 4 | 173034 | - 1087°5 | 577421) 31°84 | , 173136 | 2a | Fe. 1089'6 5771338 32770 | ,, 1732:22 | 2a 10961 | 576204! 35°50] ,, 173502 | 3c | Fe. 10968 | (57613) | 35°7 0 1735-2 la 1097°8 | 5760:30) 36:02] ,, 173554 | la 110074. | 5756-20} 37°26 | ,, 173678 | 1a 1102'1 5753°66| 38°02] ,, 173754 | 3b | Fe. T1029 5752°27| 3844] 4 173796 | 3a Group 1729, Faint. ae 1737. aint. Kirchhoff. OSCILLATION-FREQUENCIES OF SOLAR RAYS. CarAaLOGvuE (continued). 53 5662°95 a Reduc- Ang- Reci- | tion to strom. | procals.| va- |Freauency. cuum. 5752:09 | 1738-50 | 048 | 1738-02 (57519) | 38°6 + 17381 5746°88| 40°07 | 048 | 1739-59 574102} 41°85 | 049 | 174136 573064) gsr | ,, 174452 572590| 4645] ,, 174596 5716-98] 4917] 1748°68 5716:26| 49°39 | 5, 1748:90 571409 50°06 ry) 174957 571343| 50:26] ,, 1749°77 571094] sro2 | ,, 175053 5710:05| 51°30 | ,, 1750°81 5708°45| 51°79] ,, 175130 5707-28! «5215 | ,, 1751°66 570614) 52°50] ,, 1752:01 570516) 52°80] ,, 1752°31 5708°59| 53°28 | ,, 1752:79 570272) 53°55 | 5 175306 570054| s422] ,, 175373 5697°38| 55719 | _,, 1754-70 569560} 5574] ,, 1755:25 569411! 56:20] ,, 175571 569291] 56-57 | _,, 175608 569074} 57°24 | 5, 1756°75 5689-48] 57°63 | ,, 175714 5687°34| 58:29 | ,, 1757:80 5685°68} 58-80 | ,, 1758°31 5683°61| 59°44 | ,, 1758'95 5681°52| 60°09 | _,, 1759-60 5678:08| 61:16 | ,, 1760°67 6674:58| 62:24 | ,, 1761:75 (5668°6) | 6471 - 1763°6 (5667°9) | 643 5 1763'8 5666-17 | 64°86 | ,, 176437 5664'67 ” 1764'84 176537 Inten- sity and width. 2b 2b 2c la Qa 2a 2b 2b 8c 3¢ 4d 2c 2b 3b 2a la la la la Fe. Origin, &e. Groups. Group 1752. Faint. Group 1758. Strong. Group 1767. Strong. 54 REPORT—1878. CaraLoGuE (continued). a _ |Redue- Inten- Kirchhoff. aed Mais sage) Frequency. na Origin, &c. Groups. cuum. width. | 1170°6 | 5661-65| 1766-27 | 049 | 176578 | 2c | Fe, Ti. / 5659°77| 66°36 | ,, 176637 |. | 1174°2 | 5657-°70| 67°50 |_,, 1767-01 | 5d | Fe. 1175°0 | 5656:85| 67°77 | ,, 1767:28 | 2a | 11766 | 565456| 6848| ,, | 176799| 3c Fe. 11770 |(56540)| 687 | ,, 17682 | 2a 11773 | 5653°50| 68-82 | _,, 1768:33 | la | 11776 |(5653:1)| 68-9 2 17684 la 1178°6 5651°74| 69°37] ,, 1768°88 | la | 11790 =| (5651-2) | 69°55 es 1769:0 la 11794 |(5650°7)| 69°77 | ,, 17692 | la 11798 |(56500)| 699 | , | 17694 | 1a wm80'2 «| 5648-11) oso] ,, 177001 | la | | 11834 | 5644°73| 71°56 | _,, 1771-07 | 2a | 1184°8 6643:19| 72°05 | ,, 177156 | 3a | Ti. 1186°8 |(5640°7) | _72°8 # 17723 2a | | 1187°1 | 5640°35| 72°94 | _,, 1772:45 | 2a | Fe. 1189°3 | 5637°36] 73388 | _,, 1773°39 | 3b | Fe. Group 1774. r1g0°1 | 5636:39| 74:18 | ,, | 177369| 2b | Faint. 563467] 74731 5 177424)... | 1193°I 5632°79| 75°32 | 0-49 177483 | 3a | Fe. 1199°6 | 5624°50| 77°93 | 050 | 177743 | 2d “Group 1779. 12006 | 5623-36| 7830] ,, 177730 | -4b | Fe. Strong. — 1z01'0 =| (5622°8) 73°5 ; 1778:°0 Qa 7203°5 |(5621:1)| 790 | ,, 17785 | 2c | 5619-41] 79°55 | 5, 177905 |... 1204'2 | 561863} 79:79 | 5; 1779:29 | 2c 1204°9 5617:95| 80°01 | ,, 1779751 | 2d 12061 561622) 80°56] ,, -.| 178006} le 1207°3 5614-65] 8105 | ,, 178055 | 5g | Fe. 1217°8 5601'84| 85713 | ,, 1784:63 | 5d | Fe, Ca Group 1787 12192 | 5600°35| 85-60 | _,, 178510 | 3c |Ca. ae 5). veal 1220°1 5599:06| 8601 | ,, 178551 | 2c strong. 12216 =| 5597:31| 86°57 | ,, 1786:07 | 5d |Ca, Fe 1224°7 559356) 87°77 | » 1787-27 | 5d |Ca. 1225°3 | 5592°76| 88-03] ,, 1787°53 | 1b . ow OSCILLATION-FREQUENCIES OF SOLAR RAYS, 5d CATALOGUE (continued). - __ |Redue- Inten- a sein eet Frequency. a Origin, tre. Gecupe: cuum. width. |° | la | aaa aed Pre la 5591-32 | 1788-49 | o50 | 1787-99 | 2d | Fe. 5589°17 89°17 ss 1788:67 | 2d | Ca. 5587'76| 89°63] ,, 1789:13 | 4c |Ca. 5586°79| 89794 | , 1789°44 | 2c 5585°69} go'29 | _ ,, 1789:79 | 5d | Fe. 5583-96 9084 | . | 179034| 2b |Fe. 5580°94| 91°81 | ,, 179131 3d | Ca. Group 1795. 557769} 92°86] ., 179236 | 2c | Fe. Strong. 557504] 93°71 | 55 1793:21 4a | Fe. 5571-82) 94°75 | », 1794:25 | 6c | Fe. 556864] 95°77 | 5 179527 | 4d | Fe. 5566°50| 9646] ,, 1795:96 | 3b 556478 | 97°02 | ,, 179652 | 3d | Fe. 5562°88| 97°63 os 179713 3c 556192) 97°94 | »» 1797-44 | 2b 5559°40| 9876! ,, | 4798-26 | 2b 5557°22| 179946 | ,. 1798-96 | 2b 555404 | 1800°49 | ,, 1799:99 | 38e 5552°79| oo-g0] ,, 1800-40 | 2b (5546:2) | 0370 x 1802°5 la 5545°59| 03°23 ar 1802°73 | 2a | Fe. 554283] 0413 | ,, 180363 | 3a 554210} 0437] ., 1803°87 | 3a | Fe. (5537°1) | 06"0 of 18055 la 5536'48| 0620] ,, 1805°70 | la 553421) oc6'94 | ,, 1806-44 | 3b | Ba. (55336) | 0771 i 1806°6 3a |Sr, 5581-77] 077741 5, 1807:24 | 2a | Fe. (55812)} 079 | » | 18074 | 1a 5529°64| 08-44 | ,, 1807°94 552754] og12]| ,, 180862 | 6d | Mg. Group 1809. 5526-05| og6x | ,, 180911 | 3c | Fe. ant. 5524 81 Io‘02 | _,, 1809°52| 2c B23 17) > TORS es 1810-04 |... 552164] 3106] ,, 181055 | 2c 56 Kirchhor,| 428- 1287°5 1289°7 1291'9 1293'8 es 1295°6 1296°3 LES) 1298'9 a2 O07. 1302'0 1303'5 1306°7 1315'0 1315'7 1319'0 1320°6 1321°1 03233 1324'0 1324°8 1325°3 1327°7 1328°7 13304 13333 13340 1336°3 13370 13378 13385 strom. 5519°64 5515°78 5513°49 5511-95 5511-65 (55103) 5509°43 5507-69 5505-99 5505°29 5502/90 5501-99 5500°65 5496-74 5493°62 5492°63 5489-05 5486-94 (5486-2) 548251 5480-29 (5479°7) 5ATT-54 (5476°8) 5476-04 (5475°6) 547343 5472°40 546988 (5466'6) 54G5°75 5463'33 5462-44 (5461°5) (5460°7) Reci- procals. 1811'71 12°98 13°73 14°24 14°34 14°8 15°07 15°64 16°20 16°43 17°22 17°52 17°97 19°26 20°29 20°62 21°81 22°51 22'8 23°98 24°72 24°9 25°64 25°9 26°14 26°3 27°01 27°35 28°19 293 29°57 30°39 30°68 310 313 REPORT—1878. CaTaLOGvE (continued). Reduc- Inten- tion to sity ae Frequency. and cuum. width. 0°50 1811-20 Le ” 181247 | 2c ” 1813:22 | 3c 99 1813:73 | 38c¢ ” 181383 | 3c Fh 18143 la ” 1814:56 | 2e ” 181513 | la ” 181569 | 5e 9 1815:92 | 2e¢ ” 1816:71 ” 181701 | 2¢ ” 1817-46 | 5e 5 1818:75 | 5e ” 1819°78 9 1820°11 » | 1821:30 ” 1822:00 4c » 18223 2b os0 | 1823-47 | 3 O'51 1824°21 | 4c ” 1824°4 3b ” 182513 | 2b 9 18254 | 2b ” 182563 | 4d » | 18258 | 24 ” 182650 | 4b ” 182684 | 2b ” 182768 | 3b ” 1828°8 la ” 182906 | 4b ” 182988 | 1b » 183017 | 4d ” 1830°5 Ib ” 1830°8 lb Origin,. &e. Groups. Ba. Ti. Group 1817. : Faint. ye Fe, Ti. Group 1824. aint. Fo. Fe. “Ts ; OSCILLATION-FREQUENCIES OF SOLAR RAYS. 57 v . : CATALOGUE (continued). I fan Reduce- Inten- o - Reci- |tiont it yi ‘Kirchhoff. sony proce a ? Frequency. ae Origin, &c. Groups. cuum, width. 1343°5 | 5454°84) 1833-23 | o51 | 183272] 6e | Fe. | Between these rays 13511 | 5446-07 3619| ,, | 183568| 5d /Fe,TiJ *2ty fT. | Gi agso, 13527 | 54°38) 36-76 | ., | 188625] 5b | Fe. Binonge 13565 «=| (54403) | 38-1 » 18376 la | §1360°9 | 5435°58) 39°73 | » 1839-22 | la 313616 =| 543499} 39°93 |_,, 1839:42 | la | : Weare | 649317) 4o'55 | ,, 1840-04 | 5b | Fe. : These positions are on the | | 1364°3 543189] 40°98 | _,, 184047) la assumption that what F ; : : Angstrém measured was | 1364-7 (54315) | gid ” 1840°6 peak it dhe’ Teas refrangible of E the two rays, | 1367°0 5428°96| 41°97 a 184146 6d | Fe, Ti. §1371'4 «=| (54248) | 434 . 1842°9 1b | Ba. | 1313721 |(5424-2)| 43°6 » 1843°1 lb 1372°6 5423°70| 43°76] ,, 1843:25 | 5b |Fe. | Identification of A ng- 1374°8 5420:26| 44°93 |_,, 184442 | le strom’s ray with Kirch- 13774 541806} 45°68 | ov52 1845716 | la | Ti. 1379'°0 | 541622} 4631 | _,, 184579 | la Group 1850. 1380'5 | 541463) 4635! , | 194633| 4c | Fe. Strong. 5413-54 47°22 ” 1846-70 Me 5412-57 | 47°55 | ,, 1847-03 |... 13847 | 541015] 48-38 | ,, 184786 4c | Fe. 43857 | 540912) 4873 ., | ‘1g4g-21| 5b | Cr. Identification with | 13863 | 540873] 48°86 | _,, 1848:34 2b | Ti. | Kirchhoff’s very 13874 | 540667! 49°57| ,, | 184905! 2b Soma | 13893 | 540495/ 5016! , | 1949641 6c |Fe. | 1390°9 5403-28] 50°73] ,, 1850-21 | 5d | Fe, Ti. 7394°2 5399-71) sr-95 | ,, 185143 | 4¢ | Fe. 1395°3 5398°40| 52:40] ,, 1851°88 | le M3964 | 5397-35| 52-76 |, 1852-24 | 2e 13975 | 5396-19| 53:16 | _,, 185264 | 5c | Fe, Ti. 14002, | 5393°63|} 54°04 | _,, 185352 | 3b, | H4or6 | 539238) s4'a7| ., | 1953:05| 4c | Fe. me 5391°38; 54°81] ,, 1854:29| ... |: 1031 | 539073} 55°04 | _,, 185452 | 3c | 1404"1 5889°60|} 55:42 | ,, 1854:90 | 1b | Fe. 58 REPORT—1878. . CaTALOGuE (continued). m __ |{Redue- Inten- rintos.| ng: | Bai, /898'°lpseguamer| S35 | Ovi tn cuum. width. 1405°2 | 538863) 1855°76 | 0°52 185524 | 3b rq10'5 | 5882-47) 57°88 | 1857:36 | 4c |Fe. 14125 | 538034) 5862] ,, 185810 | 2b | Ti. 14140 | 53878°76] 5916 | 5, 1858°64 | 2b | Fe. 1415°8 5876°70| 59°88 | ,, 1859°36 | 2b 14194 "| 5372°71| 6126] 5, 1860°74 | 2b Group 1863 1421'5 | 587065| 6197) 4 | 186145 | Ge |Fe. Strong. 1423'0 5869:15| 62°49] ,, 1861:97 | 5b | Fe. 1423°5 |(53686) | 62°7 + 1862:2 2b | Co. 14254 | 5386665| 63°36] 5, 1862°84 | 5b | Fe. 1427°5 | 5386453) 6410] 5, 186358 | 3b’ 14282 | 586411) 64:24 | , | 186372 | 5b | Fe. 14301 5386204] 64°96 | ,, 186444 | 5b | Fe. 14312 5360°86| 65°37 | 5, 1864°85 | 1b 14389 | 5352°57| 6826 | ,, 1867°74 | 4c |Co, Fe. Group 187: 14422 | 5351:36| 68°68| ,, | 186816] 1b |Co. Birongy 14431 | 5348°75| 69°59 |» 1869:07 | 2b | Fe, Ca. 1443°5 |(5848-4)| 69'7 | 5, 18692 | 2b |Ca. 1444°4 5347-51] 7o:03 | ;, 186951 | 4b 1445'7 5845°58| 70°70 | ,, 187019 | 4c ot 5845:12| 70°86] ,, 1870°35 |... 1443°7 | 5842'75| 71°69 |, 187118 | 2a |Co. 14494 | 5842-21] 7188) ,, 1871:37 | la |Co. 1450°8 53840°38| 72°53 | » 187201 | 5c | Fe. 14518 | 5339°35| 72°89 | 1872°37 | 5b | Fe. 1453°7 | 5388775) 73°45 |» 187293 | la 14547 | 5338707] 73°69] ,, 187317 | 3b | Ti. 5a 5336'03| 74°05 | ,, 187353 | ... | Ti 14566 | 533396] 74°78 |», 1874:26 | la 14586 | 583215) 75°42 | 4 187490 | 3c |Fe. 5330°68| 75°93 | 5 1875-41 1461°5 5329°21| 7645] ,, 187593 | 2c 1461'2 |(5328°5)| 76°7 5 1876°2 2¢ Strong. 14628 |) sso7-42| 7708] » | 187656 {oe \me 1464.3 550 oes Pe aco la 14653 ye ARs eo fe la OSCILLATION-FREQUENCIES OF SOLAR RAYS. 59 CATALOGUE (continued). —— ? Reduc- | Inten- | Kirchhoff. Ang: a. eerste Frequency. a cuum. | width. 1466°8 5323°50 | 1878-46 | 0°52 1877:94 | 5c | Fe. 1468°8 582144} 79:19 | ,, 187867 | 2b 1469°6 | 532063! 79:48 | o52 | 187896 | 1b 14739 | 531607! 81-09 | 0°53 1880°56 | 5b | Fe. 14753 531454] 81°63 | ,, 188110 | la 14768 | 5313-15} 8212! ,, 188159 la | 14775 |(5812'4)| 824 | ,, 18819 | la cat 5307°87| 83:99 | ,, 188346 | ... 1483°0 | 530661] 8444] ,, 188391 | 4b | Fe. 580512! 8497 | ,, | 1884-44 | 530301] 85:72 | ,, 1885719 | 1487'7. | 5301°61| 86:22 | ,, 188569 | 5b | Fe. 14892 53800710] 86:76] ,, 1886238 2¢ 14899 | (5299-7) 86'9 a 18864 | la 14912 =| (5298-0) | 87°5 7 18870 le hae 5297°63| 8764. | _,, 188711 | 3c 14924 | 5296-70} 8797| ,, | 188744. 4b 14931 | 5296-21/ 8814] ,, 188761 | 4b 1494°5 | (5294'S) 88°6 i .18881 | la 14959 | 929271) 8939] ,, 1888°86 | la 1497°3 5291-82} 89:71 | ,, 1889:18 | la | Cu. 15013 | 5287°75/ o116 | ,, 1890°63 | 2b | Fe, 133 5286°37| 9166 | ,, 189113 |... 1504°8 |(5284°3)|} 924 i 18919 la 15053 |(5283°8)| 92°6 e 18921 la 15057 |(5283'4)| 927 | ,, 18922 | 2a 1506°3 528278 | 92°94 | ,, 1892-41 | 5c | Fe. 1508°6 5281-06) 93°56 | _,, 1893-03 | 5b | Fe. b 15103 | 5279'73| gq:04 | ,, 189351 | 2c | Co. 1515°5 | 527518} 95°67 |, 1895714 4d -1516'5 527441! 95°95 | ,, 1895-42 | 4c stg | 527266] 9658) ,, | 189605 4d | Fe, 3522°7| «| 5269°59| 97°68 | _,, 189715 6c | E,, Fe, 1523°7 | 5268°67| 98-01 |_,, 189748 6c |B, Fe. 15250 | 526730} 9847| ,, | 4997-94 1b | Co. 15277 | 5265°94| 99°00 | _,, 189847 5e | Fe, Co. wh a eeSSsSssSsSSSSSSSSSsSsSSSSsssSSSSSSSSSSSSsSsS Origin, &e. Groups. Group 1887. Faint. Group 1893. Strong. Group 1898 (the E Group). Very strong. Ca. a 60 Kirchhoff. 1$28°7 1530°2 15312 153255 1533°1 1541°4 ( 1541°9 1543°7 1545'5 1547°2 1547°7 1551°0 1551°6 1555°6 15573 15610 1564'2 1566's 1567°5 1569°6 1573°5 1575°4 157772 15776 ( 15794 ) 1580°1 J 1588°3 158971 | 1590°7 15923 1598°9 1601"4 1601°7 1604°4 1606°4 ———— ° Ang- strom. 5264-68 5263°51 5262-60 5261-11 5259-78 (5254°6) 5254-21 5252:60 5251-15 524643 5242°86 524167 5239:16 5236-44 5234-52 5283°72 5282:24 5220-14 5227-63 5226'38 (5226-0) 5224°42 5217-28 5216-64 5215°64 521450 5209-59 5207°78 (52076) 520537 5203°88 Reci- procals. 1899°45 1899°87 1900°20 00°74 O22 031 REPORT—1878. CaTALoGuE (continued). Reduc- tion to va- cuum. 0°53 03°23 03°82 04°34 04°33 Ose 7. 06°06 07°36 07°79 08°70 09°69 10°39 10°69 11°23 12°36 12°91 13°37 13°5 14°09 16°71 16°94 17°31 Inten- Frequency. we Origin, &e. width. 1898:92 | 5c | Ca. 1899°34 | 4c | Ca. 189967 | 4c | Fe. ) 4b | Ca. a { 4b | Ca. 1900°69 1902°6 lg 1902°70 | 3b | Fe, Mn. 1903:29 | 2a | Fe. 190381 | 2a | Fe. 1904:30 | 3a | Fe. 1904°73 | 2a 2a li { 2a | Fe. 1906°82 | 2a | Fe. 1907-25 | 3a | Fe. 190816 | la | Fe. 190915; la 1909:85 | 2b | Co. 1910715 | 2b | Mn. 191069 | 5c | Fe. 1911:'82 | 5a | Fe. 1912°37 | 1b | 1912°83 | 5c | Fe. 19130 | 3c . 2a sh { Qa | Ti. 916-17 | 1g | Cu. 1916-40 | 3b | Fe. 1916-77 | 3b | Fe. 191719 3b | Fe. 1919:00 | 2b | Ti. 1919°66 | 6b | Cr, Fe. 1919°8 3d 192055 | 5b | Cr. 192110 | 5b | Cr, Fe. Groups. Group 1904. Faint. Group 1912. Strong. Group 1921 (the Chro- mium Group). Strong. Kirchhoff. 1609°2 16113 1613°9 1615°6 | 1616°6 1617°4 161872 1618°9 1621°5 1622°3 1623°4 1627°2 1628°2 1631°5 1633°5 1634°1 1634°7 1638-7 ( ( 1642°1 1643°0 1647°3 16484 1648°8 1649°2 1650°3 1653°7 1654°0 ( ( Ang- Reci- strom. | procals. 5201-69 | 1922°45 5199°89| 23°12 519808} 23°79 519719} 24°12 519533] 24°81 5194-24} 25°21 5191-80} 2611 5190°68| 26°33 5188-33} 27°40 5187-49] 27°71 518524) 28°55 518310} 29°35 5182°75| 29°48 (5182°3)| 29°6 5179°66| 30°63 517827 | 31°15 5176°52| 31°80 5175°73| 32°09 (51731) | 3371 (5172-4) | 33°3 517216] 33°43 (5171°9) | 33°5 5171-20) 33°79 5168-48] 34°80 (5168-2) | 34°9 5166°88|} 35:40 (51667) | 35°5 5165°88| 35°78 516473 | 36°21 5161°76| 37°32 | 5157-64] 38-49 (51560)| 39's OSCILLATION-FREQUENCIES OF SOLAR RAYS, CaTALoGvuE (continued). Reduc- Inten- pee Frequency. ae Origin, &e. cuum. width. 0°54 | 192191 | 5b | Fe. re 192258 | lc ” 192325 | 3b |)Fe 7 | daanss | an | Mesateton on 1b 2b aes 3b ” 1924:27 | ... | Mn. ” 192467 | 4b | Fe. ae lb x. 1925:57 |. 5c | Fe. ” 1925:99 | 5b | Fe. ” 1926°86 | 5b | Ca. ” 192717 | *%b | Ti. ” 192801 | (tb | Fe. ” 192881 | 4¢ ” 1928:94 | 6g |b,, Mg. ” 1929:1 ae 9 193009 | 1b | Fe. ” 193061 | ... » 1931:26 | 1b ” 193155 | 1b | Ni. ” 1932°6 5a ” 1932°8 4e » 1932:89 | 6f | b,, Mg. Winged ray. ” 1933°0 4e ” 193325 | 6b | Fe. ” 1934:26 | 6b | b,, Fe, Ni. 9 1934-4 4e 9 193486 | Ge | b,, Fe, Mg. » 19350 4d ” 1935:24 | 5b | Fe. » 1935:67 2 b | Fe. ” 1936:78 | 5b | Fe. ” 193794 | 3a | Fe. » 1939-0 la 61 Group 1924. ‘aint. Group 1926. Strong. Group 1932 (the great Magnesium Group). Kirchhoff. eR 1672°2 1673°7 1674°7 16762 Ce 1677°9 16381°6 1684'0 1684°4 1685°9 1686°3 } 1689°5 16g0°0 1691'0 REPORT—1878. | Caranoevue (continued). Fe Reduc- Inten- Ang- Reci- | tion to sity strom. | procals.| va- |Freauency.) and cuum. width. 5155:20| 1939'79 | 054 | 1939-25 (ee 5158:'22| 40°53 | 55 1939:99 | 4a 5152'69| 40°73 | 3 194019 | 3c (51516) | grr | 19406 | 24 5151-40] 41-22] ,, 194068 | 4b 5150'28| 41°64] 5, 194110 | 4c 5147-63} 42°64 | 194210 | 4c HL4H ST || 43740 || a: 194276 | 4a ii 1b Qa 5144°64| 43°77 | 5 1943°28 ore Leese ia oe) Fae Seladaas 44°71 ” 194417 { 5b 5141:37| 4501 | 1944:57 | 5b 513878} 45°99 | » | 1945-45| be 3c 5186:93| 46°69 | ,, 194615 e é 518310] 4814] ,, ~ 494760. 5¢ 9 513097| 4895)» | 1949-41 { — 2e 512874| 49°80 | 054 | 4949-26 { 3b 512681! 50°53 | 0°55 | 4949-98 | 5a 512561| 50°99 | 1950-44 | 3b 512454] 51°39) . 1950°84 | 5b 5123:32| 51°86 | ,, 1951:31 | +> 5121:18| 52°67 |, 195212 | 4b 512008] 53°09 | |, 195254 | le (5115°3)| 54°99 |» 19544 | la 5115-01] 55°03 |» | 195448 | 3b 511246] 5600 | ,, 195545 | + 5109'94| 56:97 | ,, 195642 | 5b 5108-98} 57°34 | » 195679 | 3b 510716| 58:03 | ,, 195748 | 5d 510507} 58°34] ,, 1958-29 | 4b 5103-77 | 59°33.) 4 1958°79 { ; F 510234] 59°88 |_,, 1959:33 | 2a Origin, &e. | Group 1945. Groups. Strong. OSCILLATION-FREQUENCIES OF SOLAR RAYS. CaTALoGuE (continued). d b Reduc- 2 Ang- Reci- | tion to Kirchhoff. strom. procals. | va- cuum, 1748°9 5099°19 | 196110 | 0°55 1749°6 ae € » | 17504 | 5098:28|) 61:45] ,, 1752:0 |(5097°2)| 61°9 ” 1752°8 5096°64| 62°08 | ,, 1762'0 5090°45 64°46 re 17715 5083°68] 67°08 | ,, 1772°5 5082°60|} 67°50 | ,, 1774/0 508192) 67°76 | ,, 17758 5080°78} 68:20] ,, 1776°5 5079°88 68°55 PF 1777°5 5078°95| 68:91 | ,, 1778°5 5O7T8OL| 69:27) ,, 1782°7 5075'96| 70:07 | ,, 17844 |(5074°7)| 70°6 PF 1785'0 5074:24| 70°74] ,, 17877 |(5072'5)| 714 | 1788°7 BOTL84 71:67 | ,, 1793°8 5068'27| 73:06] ,, 17954 |(5067-0)| 73°6 : 179670 506651) 73°74] 5, 17978 |(5065°3)) 742 | » 179970 | 506453} 74°52 | ,, 1799°6 ” 9 18064 | 5059°87/ 7634] ,, 1818°7 5051-11] 79°76) ,, 18214 5049°49| 8040] ,, 1822°6 |(5048'7)| 80'7 if 1823'2 | (50483) | 80'9 is 1823°6 5047'92| 81-o1 is 18286 | (50446) | 82:3 - 5043°54| 82°73] ,, 1830°r = | (5042'S) | 83°0 is 1832°38 (50417) | 83:5 | 55 63 Inten- Frequency. ny Origin, &e. Groups width. 1960°55 | 3c | Ni. Group 1961. " 2d | Ni. Strong. 1960:90 | 5c | Fe. 1961-4 2b 1961:53 | 4c | Fe. 1963-91 | 3c | Fe. gist 196653 | 3c Group 1968. 196695 | 3c | Fe. Faint. 196721 | 2b 1967°65 | 3b | Ni. 196799 | 3c | Ni. 1968:36 | 3c | Fe. 1968°72 | 3c | Fe. 196952 | 3b | Fe. ci eine 1970:1 1b 197019] 4b | Fe. 19709 2¢e 197112 | 3b | Fe. 1972'51 | 4b | Fe. Group 1973. 19731 la Strong. 197319 | 3a | Fe. 1973°7 la 197397 | 4c | Ti. a 3b 197579 | 2b | Fe. ar 1979:21 | 5b | Fe. Group 1980. 1979'85 | 5b | Fe. Strorg. 1980°2 3a 1980°4 2a 198046 | 2a | Fe. 19818 1b Possibly this ray 1982:18 Fe. is K 1828°6 or K 183071. 1982°5 3b 19830 Qa | Ca. rEPORT—1878. CaraLoeveE (continued). 64 ° Kirchhoff, | Ans" 18334 “ap 5040-80 1834°3 5040-28 1835°9 1836°7 +| 5038°30 1837°5 1841°0 1841°6 |} | 503547 1842°2 18489 =| 5030-27 1851'0 5029°12 1853°2 5027°43 1854°0 5026°54 1854°9 | 5025-76 1856'9 =| (50245) 1857°9 | (50239) 186074 | (5022°4) 18613 5021°89 1862°3 5021°30 1864°9 5019-52 1867°1 5017-76 1868-4 | (5016°7) 1869°5 | (5016°2) 1870°6 =| (5015°4) 18724. | 5014:22 18734. | 5013-48 ; 18742 | (5013-0) 1874°8 | (5012°6) 1875°8 | (50120) | 1876°5 5011-56 Reci- procals, 5041°32 | 1983°61 83°81 84°02 84°80 85°91 37°96 88-42 89'09 89°44 89°75 go'2 905 git 91°28 gi's2 92°22 92592 Groups. Group 1984. Strong. Group 1993. Strong. Reduc- Inten- a Frequency. ma Origin, &e. cuum. width. Angstrém repre- | ( sents the Fe and ors5 | 1988-06 | 6e | Fo, Cay Ca reysas com hoff as separate but close. » 1983-26 | ... » 1983.47 | 6c | Fe. | Ti. Ci5S 198425 | 3c Fe. (ni. Ti. 0°56 1985°35 | 4b Ti. Ni. ” 1987-40 | 2c 9 1987:°86 | le ” 1988°53 | 3b | Fe. ” 1988°88 | 2b | Fe. ” 1989:19 | 4c ” 19896 le ” 19899 | 2b 9 1990°5 2b ” 199072 | 8c » 1990:96 | 2b | Fe. 35 1991°66 | 3b | Ti. ae 199236 | 5d This ray is repre- | sented on Ang- » 1992°8 5b | Ni. strém’s map, but not inserted in ( his list. ” 1992°9 le ” 1993'3 3a 9 199377 | 5b | Fe. ” 1994:06 | 6b | Ti. 9 19942 2a ” 1994-4 2a » 19946 2e ” 1994:83 | 6b | Fe. OSCILLATION-FREQUENCIES OF SOLAR RAYS. 65 CaTaLoGuE (continued). A _ |Redue- Tnten- Kirchhoff. a soe ee Frequency. pa Origin, &e. Groups. cuum. width. 1884°3 | 5006°72| 1997-32 | 056 | 199676 | 6b | Fe, Ti. / Group 1997. 1885°8 6b | Fe. / trong. 5005:14 : i 39 | 1836°4 j Mee i 6b | Fe. 1889°5 | 5003-21) 9872 | ,, 1998:16 | lg | Fe. 1891°0 5002°11 gg'16 ss 199860 | 3b | Fe. 18938 | (50004) | r999°8 45 1999-2 lb | 18948 4999°86 | 2000706 | ,, 1999'50 | 3b 18962 | 4998:94| 0042 | _,, 1999°86 | 4b | Ti. 1897°9 | 499754] oo'98 | ,, 200042) 1c tg00°0 =| 4996-05] o1'58 | ,, | 200102) 1c | 1904°5 | 4993-42] 02°63] ,, 200207 | 4b | Fe. | 1go51 | (4993:2)| 02°7 rs 20021 | 2c 1908°5 499048] 03°81 2003:25| 5d | Fe, Ti. IgII‘g 4988°46 04°63 “ts 2004:07| 3c | Fe. 19162 |(4985°8) | 05°7 4 2005:1 ld 1917°5 ) | 4b | Fe. ( Uncertain vingiioe Group 2006. vg }| 498484] 0608] ., | 200552) {7 | these rays belongs | Strong, Bro to Fe. 1919°8 SAR ; P 4b Fe, | (The less refrangible 1920°2 } goer ae OBG4 | as 2006:08 { 4b nit edge of a cuales 19211 | 498273] 06:93| ,, | 200637| 4b | Fe. ah 1922/0 ‘ " cab (The more refrangible 1922°4 | 4981'96] 07°24 |» 200668 AcARs } edge of a sodium band.) 1923°5 | 498117} 07°56 | _,, 200700 | 4b | Ti. 1925°8 4979°76 0813 ” 2007°57 4b Ni. 1928'0 =| 4977°94| 0836] ,, 2008'30| 4b | Fe. 1931'2 | 4975°89| o9'69| _,, 200913} 1c 1932°§ |(4975°0) |; 10'1 0 20095 | le 19362 | 4972:43| frog | _,, 201053 | 3c | Fe. _ 1939°5 | (4970°3)| 120 9 20114 | 3c 1940°6 |(4969°6)| 122 | , | 20116 | 2c 1941°5 | (4969-0) 12" & PP 2011°9 3b . \} so6744} rg | , | 901255 i . ‘4 e. |. 1947°6 | 4965°47| 13:91 | ,, 2013'35 | 4c | Fe. 19494 | 496478] 14:19] ,, 2013°63 | le 1953°6 eal 1540] 4 2014'84 | 2b | Fe. 66 REPORT— 1878. OaTALOGvuE (continued). a Reduc- Inten- : Ang- Reci- | tiont it dos Kirchhoff. st pr eee ges ig Frequency, ae Origin, &e. cuum. width. 60°8 oy (@ } 495687 |2017°40 | 0°56 | 201684 |14 |e. 19612 6b 1964°3 |(49540)| 186 | ,, 20180 | 2c 1966'2 a 2b 5210] 19°34 | 0°56 78 { 166-7 } 495) 19°34. | 0°5 2018 ab fe. 19701 | 494954] 20°39 | 0°57 2019'82 | 3b | Fe. 1974°7. | 4945°67| 21°97 | 5 202140 | 4b | Fe. 1975°7 4944-69] 22°37 | 4, 202180 | 2d 19792 4941:97| 2348 | ,, 2022°91 | 3c | Fe. 1982°8 | 5a | Fe. 1983°3 4938°'74| 24°31 | ,, 202424 |; 5a | Fe. 1983°8 5a 1984°5 | 4937°37| 25°37] » 202480 | 4b 1985°8 | 4986-49] 2573] 5, 202516 | 4b 1986-9 | (4935°7)| 261 % 20255 Qa 1987°5 | 4935-21) 26:26] ,, 202569 | 3a | Ni. 1989'5 | 498355] 26°94] ,, 2026°37 | 6c | Ba. 1990°4 4932°89| 27:21 | ,; 202664 | 5b | Fe. 1991'8 493131 27°86 | ,, 202729 | 1b 1994°1 492961] 28°56] ,, 202799 | 5b | Fe. 6 2 Fe. "999 V) 4927-00| ag'63 | » | 202006 /{ 5° | 1997°5 2a 1999°6 | 492464| 30°61 | ,, 203004] 2c 2000°6 | (4923-9) 30°9 4 2030°3 ba 2001°6 4923:20| 3120] 5, 203063 | 5c | Fe. 2 3b co } 4921-44} 3193! | 208136 { 2003'7 la + ioe g |(4920:1)| 32°5 ” 20319 2d 2005°2 | 491989} 32°57 | 5, 203200 | 6d | Fe. 2007°2 4918-31] 33722] 5 2032°65| 6c | Fe. 2008°1 4917-'75| 33°45 | » 2032°88 | 1b | Ni. 2008'6 |(4917°4)| 3376 5 20330 1b 2009°8 4916°57| 33°94] » 2033°37 | 2b : 2a 79739 V1 491335] 3527] » | 203470// 2014°3 2a Groups. Group 2025. Strong. Group 20382. Strong. OSCILLATION-FREQUENCIES OF SOLAR RAYS. CaTALocun (continued). 67 a _ |Redue- Inten- Kirchhoff. aa ee . esr Frequency. ia cuum. width. a 4911°32 | 203611 | 0°57 203554 2015°7 to | 4911-1 36°2 + 2035°6 1 2016'9 ee (4909'3)| 370 | » | 20364 | ic 2018°5 2b 2019°5 |(4908:5)| 37°73 9 2036°7 2a 2021°2 490714 37°85 3 203728 | lg | Fe. 2024°9 © |(4904:2)| 3971 3 20385 la 2025°7 | 490408} 3912] ,, 203855 | 4a | Ni. 2026°8 4902°61] 39:73 | 203916 | 4b | Fe. 20311 | 4899°47} grog | ,, 204047 | 2c | Ba. 20354 | 489596] 42°50 | _,, 204193 | 1b : 20396 | 489233] 4401 | ,, 2043:44| 1b 2041°3 | 4890°98) 44°58 | _,, 2044:01| 6c | Fe 2042°2 4890:19) 44°91 Pe 204434] 6b | Fe. *t5 || 4988-40] 4666] ., | 2045-09 { 2 204570 5b | Fe. 204770 | 488681) 4632 | ,, 2045°75| 3d | Fe. 2047°8 488602} 46°66 | ,, 204609 | 3b | Fe. voc, t| #88468) 4723) » | 2046066 | { Siok 2049°7 3a 2051°3 488330] 47°80] ,, 2047:23 | 3c 4883°02| 47°91 5 2047°34 | ... eli \ 4981:12| 4871] ,, | 204914 F BOR 2053°7 4¢ 20580 =| 4877°57| 50:20 | _,, 2049°63 | 6c | Fe, Ca. 2060°0 487546 | s1og | ,, 2050°52 | 2b | Fe. 2060°6 Fe 2a 2061°0 ee $5 eas la 2064'7 | 4873:08| 52°09 |_,, 205152 | 2c | Ni. 20662 4871-43] 52°78) ,, 2052°21 | 5c | Fe. 2067°1 487061} 53:13] ,, 2052°56 | Se | Fe. 20673 |(4870'1)| 533 | , | 20597 | 3b 2068°8 =| (4869°4) 53°6 " 20530 3b 20706 (48681)! sa | ,, | 20536 | 1b 2071°3 | 486765) 54°38 | 057 | 205381] 1b | Co. 2073°5 | 4865-44) 55°31 | 058 | 2054:73| 3b | Ni. Group 2046. Strong. Group 2051. Strong. 68 Kirchhoff. 2074°6 2076°5 2077°3 2079°5 2080°0 (2080°5 REPORT—1878. CaTaLoauE (continued). 2109°1 211! 2112°7 21150 } 2115°4. ~ 2119°8 21212 2121°9 21243 212571 2127°7 21323 2132°7 A Reduc- Ang- Reci- jtion to strém. | procals.| va- |Freduency. cuum. (4864°8) | 2055°6 | 058 20550 4863°68|° 56:06 | ,, 2055°48 (48630) | 5673 »9 2055°7 486074| 57°31 | ,, 56-73 4859°29| 57°91 A 2057°33 (48567) | 590 5 20584 (4855°3) | 59°6 si 2059 0 4854'85| 59:80 | ,, 2059-22 (4854:2)| 6or | ,, | 20595 (48522) | Gog ” 2060:3 4851:02| 61-42 | ,, | 206084 4848-23} 62:6:| ,, | 206203 484253} 65:04 | _,, 206446 (48421) ) 652 * 2064°6 (48400) | 66-1 oy 20656 4839:29| 66-42 | ,, 2065'84 | (48387) | 66-7 | ,, 2066:1 4837°80| 67:05] ,, 2066°47 (4835°6) | 68'0 ” 2067°4 483519] 68:17] ,, 206759 483191} 69°57 | ,, 2068 99 4830°34| 7025 | _,, 2069°67 4828'57| 7101 3 207043 (4824-2) | 72"9 ” 20723 482290 73441 ,, 207286 4819-91} 74:73] ,, | 207415 (4819:2)| 750 | ,, | 20744 4811-70| 7827] ,, | 2077-69 Inten- sity and width. 2b 1b Origin, &e. Fe. Fe. Fe, Ni. 2a 2b 3b 3b 3a 3a 1b 4b 5e¢ 1b 2b 3b 2a la Ca. Co, Fe. Ni. Mn. Ca. Zn. le, H. Winged ray. Groups. Group 2058 (theF Group). Strong. Group 2068. aint. Group 2074. Faint. Group 2081. Faint. Kirchhoff. 21338 213473 21360 21380 at 22395 214074 2141'9 2142°4 2144°6 2146'9 | 214774 : 2148°5 2148°9 2150°1 2150°5 2157°0 21574 2159'0 | 2160°6 | 2160°9 2161'7 2162°6 2163'7 * 2164°0 2167°5 21715 2172°2 21757 217674 27919 2181°2 2184'9 2186°5 2187°1 2187°9 2188°5 } } OSCILLATION-FREQUENCIES OF SOLAR RAYS. CaraLoGueE (continued). a Reduc- Ang- Reci- |tion to strém. | procals.| va- |Freauency. cuum. 4809°83 | 2079'08 | 0°58 2078°50 4808:17| 79:79 | 5, 2079°21 4806-49 | 80°52 | ,, 207994 4804:54| 81°36] ,, 2080°78 4802-46] 82:27 | ,, 2081:69 480004} 83:32 | ,, 2082°74 479913) 83-71 ‘ 208313 4797-70} 84°33 2083°75 4791-78 86:91 95 2086°33 4788-73} 88-24 | ,, 208766 (47884) | 884 | ,, 2087°8 (4787-8) | 88-6 is 20880 478590} 89:47 | 0°58 2088°89 478273} 90°86 | 0°59 | 2090:27 4778°85| 92°55 | 5, 2091:96 (4778°3) | 92°8 ” 2092°2 477566 93°95 | 5 209336 (4775°0)| 94°72 | 2093°6 4771-92) 93°59 | 5» 2093-00 4770°37| 96:27 | _,, 209568 476759} 97°49 | » 2096:90 4765°92| 98:23] ,, 209764 4764°'79| 98°73 | ,, 209814 (4764-5) | 98-9 3 20983 Inten-| sity and width. Qa. | ti Ca. 5a | Zn. 2g 4a 4a 4a 5a | Ti. 4a | Fe. 3 69 Origin, &c. The identity of either of these rays with ° Angstrém’s is doubtful. Groups. | Group 2088. Faint. | | Group 2100. Strong. Kirchhoff. 2190'1 2191°9 pans 21933 2195°7 21971 2197°7 21988 2199°2 2201°1 2201'9 2203°3 2203°8 22051 2206°4 2206°7 2209'1 2211°7 221374 2215°1 2216°7 2217°5 2218°3 2219°8 2221°3 2221°7 2222°3 2.223°5 2225°4 2226°2 2227°6 2228°6 2229'1 2230°7 22312 B2R273 (caso 2234°0 } (4763'3) (4762-0) 4761-68 4760°85 (4758°6) 4757-07 4755°34 (4754-0) 4753°47 (4752°5) (4752°2) 4751°32 (4749°0) (4748'8) 4747°34 4745-32 4743°57 4741-89 (47402) (4739:5) (4739-0) (4787°5) (4737-0) (4736°6) 4736-24 (4735:1) 4733°07 (4731-7) (4731-0) 4730-95 (4729°3) (4729°0) (4727°8) 4726-70 Reci- procals. 2099°4 2100°0 folohp fe) 00°46 O1'5 02°13 02°90 0355 O35 04°2 04°3 04°68 057 05'8 06°44 C184 0812 08°86 09°6 S919 10°2 10°8 110 11°2 11°38 119 12°79 13°5 13°7 *13°74 14°5 14°6 I5‘I 15°64 REPORT—1878. CATALOGUE (continued). Redue- Inten- poe Ne Proquiaes: ae y Origin, &e. cuum. width. 059 | 20988 | 5b 9 20994 | 3e é 2099:51 | 5b | Mn. Winged ray. me 909987 | 5a | Mn. » | 21009 | 2b » | atonse |{oe | 2b 210231 | { . 2 3a | Ni , | 21029 | 2b m 2103:14 | 5c | Mn. » | 21036 | 2a Ae i alee e 2104:09 | 1b a 210571 la | Co. » | 21052 | 1a 9 2105°85 | 4c | * 210695 | 4b | Fe. fF 210753 | 4b he 2108:27 | 1b | Ti. » 2109:0 3b _ 2109°3 3b 5 2109°6 3a x 2110°2 3b 3 21104 la ” 2110°6 la | . 2110°79 | 5c | Fe. ” 21113 3¢ ; 9119-20 { 2b | Fe. 4b a 2112°9 2a , | 93a || Be ~ 211315 | 4b | Fe. , | 21139 | 4a , | 21140 | 2a , | gta | 4a | » | 911505) 5c |¥e {Rigible site, Groups. Group 2113. Faint. OSCILLATION-FREQUENCIES OF SOLAR RAYS. 71 CATALOGUE (continued). . - _ |Redue- Inten- | Kirchhoff. ae am pete, Frequency. ee Origin, &c. Groups. ° cuum. width. 223774 | 472369} 211699 | o59 | 211640 | 1b 2238°7 =éc SBE a ane lb 22400 | 4721:53| 17°96] ,, 211737 | 3b |Z. 22414 |(4720°5)| 184 | ,, 21178 2b 22451 | (4717-1)| 19°9 P, 2119°3 3b 22462 |(4716:1)| 20% f 2119°8 1b 2248°2 471444) ar14] ,, 2120°55 | 3c ; Group 2124. en” 471381 ax43| 4 | 212084) 6a |i, { Wingee op mare re- | Very strong. 2250°0 oct ne 3 oot 3d a 471198) 22°25 Fe 9121°66 a 22554 | 470950] 23°37 | ;, 212278 | 4b | Ti. 22562 |(47087)| 23:7 Z 2123:1 2b 225771 | 4708:37| 23°38] ,, 2123:29 | 4d | Fe. 22576 |(4707°8)| 24"1 & 21235 2b 2258°5 |(4707-0)| 24°5 » | 21239 2c 22594 | 470661) 24°67 | os9 | 212408 | 4c | Fe. 22614 |(4704-9)| 254 | o60 | 21248 1b 22621 |(4704°3)| 25:7 3 2125'1 2a 22634 |(4703-0)| 263 yy 21257 Qa | Mg. 2264°3 | 4702-44) 26°56] ,, 212596 | 6a saeee | £70095] eras] | agg | 2° 22680 | 4698:09] 2852] ,, 212792 | 3a | Ti. 2269': + |(4697°3)| 28*9 7 2128°3 3a 2269" (4696:7) 3a e. (4696-5) } hela UA Mig { 3a (4693:7) | 30°5 i. 2129°9 ld Group 2135. 4690°69) 31°88 | _,, 2181-28 | 4c | Fe, Ti. Faint. 2a 2a la 0k bce 1b eee nae 2a 2b 22861 ads cbc But aa 2b 22881 sua ose bo 2a 72 Kirchhoff. 2289'1 eae 2328°3 } Ang- strom. 4681:37 4679°65 4678-03 4676791 4672 41 4667:20 4666°45 4663°51 4661°80 465615 | 465407 4651-25 4647-99 (4647-2) (4646°6) 4645°39 4643-33 4639°81 4638:98 REPORT—1878. CaTALoGvsE (continued). Reduc- Inten- Reci- jtion t it: we een Mier. | ore cuum. width. : 1 ee aaa 1 Band. 213613 | o'60 | 213553 | 2b | Ti. 3691 | 5; 213631 | 2¢ | Zn. ” 2 a 1 37°65 | 5 213705 |} 3b | Fe. 38°16 | ,, 2137:°56 | 2b | Cd. gorz2| ,, | 213962] 4c | Fe. a 3b 3d 4c bate ane lb AZON N05; 2142-01 | 5b BoAD Olt aay 2142°36 | 5e |d. Ti. Winged ray.. aes 2e 44°31 | 5, 214371 | 3b ae 3b 45°09 | 5 214549 | 3b PP) 2b ” 1b Bae a, rab : ‘ ” 10 47°70 2147 ap |. 48°66 | ,, 2148.06 | 6d | Fe, Cr. 5b 96] 36 { 49°9 2149 perl Ge. ” Le 2b srs |, | 21512 | 2d | Ni. 5271 ” 2151°5 5 b Fe, Cr. SBT. | ss 2152-07 | 5b Between these rays a 53°63 | 5 2153:03 | 4b | Fe. ray of Ti. xe Ae ld : , Identification with Kirch- 55 28) 215466 | 1 { hoff’sray very doubtful. 5565] ,, 215505 | 2d | "ti. Groups. Group 2142. Strong. Group 2150. Strong. OSCILLATION-FREQUENCIES OF SOLAR RAYS. 73 CaTAaLoGuE (continued). ° ! Kirchhoff. eee. eae | 4637°30 | 215643 2347°3 2349°4 | (4635°9) | 5771 2349°9 | (46356) ) 57°72 | 463410] 57-92 2352°2 2354°1 463218} - 58°81 2357°4 i aie } 4629°77| 59°93 - 2361'0 4627-32] 61°08 2362'2 |(4625°3)| 62°70 | 4625-01| 62°16 23640 23659 §=| (4622°7) | 63:2 — 23663 =| (4622'1) | 63°5 2367°7 4621-78| 63°67 | 2369°7 |(4620°1) | 645 23714 |(4618°8)| 65-1 ie 4618-71] 65:11 2372'4 |(4618°0) | 65-4 | 2374°2 4616-79] 66:01 ( 23750 |(4615°9)| 664 2375°6 4615°56| 66°58 23761 |(4615:3)| 66:7 23790 | 461278} 67°89 23816 =| 4610°78| 68°83 | 23861 4606°80| 70°70 2386°6 23837 see 23897 | 460463) 71°73 239°0°7 2391'2 Eee ue 23931 4602°77| 72°60 23944 2395°8 “a = eS - 460062| 73°62 : Fy 1878. Reduc- tion to va- cuum. 0°60 Frequency. 2155'83 21565 2156'6 215732 2158°21 2159°33 2160°47 21614 2161°55 2162°6 2162°9 2163:06 2163'9 2164°5 2164°50 21648 216540 21658 2165°97 21661 216728 2168'22 2170°09 2171.12 217199 217301 Origin, &c. Groups. Fe. Fe. Fe. Between these a ray of Ti. Fe. Group 2166. Fe. Strong. Ca. Group 2172. Faint. Identification with Kirch- hoff’s ray doubtful. Fe. 74 Kirchhoff. 23974 2399°6 23999 2402'°2 2403°2 2404'9 2406°2 2406°6 2407°2 2408'2 2409'0 2410°2 2412°8 2414°7 2416°0 ae 63 2418°0 2419°3 2420°6 2422°3 2423°8 2424°4 2426°5 2428'4 2429°5 24.31°9 2432°4 2435°3 (aos 2435°7 ce 2438°5 2439°4 2440°0 2441°8 2396°7 to I) Ang- strom. 4597-36 4595-00 (4593'7) (4592'3) 4592-04 (45916) 4590-91 (4590°3) 4589-48 (4587°8) (4586°4) (4585°6) 4585'36 (4584°4) 4583°35 (4582°3) 4580-93 4579-65 4578°37 (4577-2) (4576-4) 4573°66 457159 (4571°5) 457094 (4569'3) 4568°64 (4568°3) 4567-26 4599-61 (4571°7) REPORT—1878. CATALOGUE (continued). Reduc- Inten- Reci- |tion to sity procals,| va- |Frequency.) and cuum. width. sais 2a 2174°10 | o'61 217349 | 2a 3a 7516 |, | @i7a5 | {0 3b 7628 | | 217567 |{ 76°9 35 21763 2b 776 5 21770 2b 77°68 | ,, 217707 | Ge 7779 | 21773 | 1b 78:22 | 5, 217761 | 4b 78°5 ” 21779 1b 7890 | » 217829 | 4b 79°7 “5 21791 3b 80°4 3 2179°8 2b 80°7 ne 21801 3d 80°85 _ 2180°24 | 5b 81°3 4 2180°7 3b 81°81 | ,, 2181:20 | 5b $2°3 ” 21817 2b 82796 || ,, 218235 | 6d s357| » | atgede |" 4b 84°18 | _,, 2183°57 | 4b 84°7 09 218411 la 8571 35 2184-5 3b 86-43 a1gss2 | {~~ H 1b 874 | » 21868 | 2b 87°42 | ,, 218681 | 5c B75 | a 21869 | 2b 87°73 ” 218712 5a 88°5 ” 21879 la 88°33 5 2188:22 | 2b 89°0 ” 21884 la Sg75011 5 2188°89 | 2a Fe, Ca, Origin, &e. Groups. Band, Fe. Group 2180. Strong. Mg. Fe, Ca. _ Co, according to Kirch- hoff, but according to te} Angstrom it is a eompo- site ray due to Fe, Ca. Ti, Group 2189. Strong. OSCILLATION-FREQUENCIES OF SOLAR RAYS. Kirchhoft| vim, | procals 2442°4 4566°71 | 2189°76 ce. | 4564:93| 90°61 2444/2 2445°3 |(45641)| g1°'0 24466 | 4563°30| g1"40 4559°54| 93°20 455816} 93°87 Be? 4555'42| 95"19 2457°9 24586 |(4555°0)| 954 2459°5 |(45545)| 95°6 24604 |(4554:0)|} 95"9 24612 | 4553:50| 96-11 74634 | 455184) 9691 24660 | 4550:29| 97°66 24673 |(4549:2)| 98-2 (676 4548:97 | 98°30 6-5 (4548'8) | 98-4 24687 | (4548°3)| 98°6 -2470°1 (4547°3) | 99'1 24712 4546°56 | 99°46 Ds (4546°3) | 2199°6 2472'9 -2473°8 4543'98 | 2200°71 4746 2475°5 - |(4542°1)| o1°6 24774 )| ,. Barr's } 4541°84| o1°75 24787 |(4541°1)| oar ae} 4540:30| 02°50 | 2481°1 Ace te 24821 |(4538:1)| 076 24324 | 4537:88| 03°67 24866 z.. | 4535°59| 04°78 2488-2 (4584°4) | 05°4 CaTaLoGuE (continued). Reduc- Tnten- ont Frequency. oe Origin, &e. cuum. width. o'61 218915 la 19000 | {°° . 5a ” 2190°4 le ” 219079 | 5b | Ti. as 2192°59 | 2c 3 2193:26 | 4b 4b | Ti. or | gtoaes|{ 1) | a, 0°62 2194:8 3a ” 21950 2b 9 21953 Te ” 9195-49 | 6b | Ba. ” 2196:29 | 4b | Ti. ” 219704 | 3a ” 2197°6 3e¢ ” 219768 | 5c |e. Ti. | Winged ray. 3 2197'8 3¢ 33 . 21980 3a ” 2198'5 4a ” 2198:84 2b | Fe.. ” 2199:0 4a 4a ” 2200:09 | 4 2¢ 4b | Ti. ” 22010 le 2a » | g20r1s |{ m1 ” 2201'5 Qa a2orss |{ 9° rg 2a na la ” 2203:0 la ” 2203°05| le 5b | Ti. » | 2204.16 { sellat ” 22048 4b | Ca. 75 Groups. Group 2196. Strong. —+— Group 2210. Strong. 76 ° Ang- Kirchhoff. | strom. tee } 4532°13 2490°8 24930 | (4530-7) 2493°6 4530°32 2493°9 a 2495'8 4528°83 2497°2 4528-08 2499°0 2499°8 4526°15 25C00°3 eae | 4524-48 2.5024 oa 452302 2505°6 4522:09 2509°4 4519°66 2512°1 75%?'5 \ 4517-90 eo (4513°3) 25184 | (4513-2) 2520°9 || (4510-4) 2522°3 ‘| (4509°4) 4507-74 2527°0 | (4506-6) 4501-75 25366. | 4500°76 2537°1 450031 (4499-7) 2540°5 449827 | 2543'5 | 4496°22 2489°4 45383°31 251770 | (4514°2) 2532°0 =| (4503°5) Reci- procals, 2205°39 06°47 07°2 07°35 08°07 08°44 09°38 REPORT— 1878. CaTALoGvuE (continued). Reduc- tion to va- cuum. 0°62 Frequency. 2205 °27 220585 2206°6 220673 220745 2207°82 2208°76 220958 2210°29 2210°75 2211°94 221280 22146 22151 2215'1 2216°5 22170 2217°79 2218'4 2219°9 2220°74 222123 2221°45 22218 222246 2223°47 Inten- sity and width. ———— 5d (sa 38a ba 3f 5b 6d 3b 3b 4c 4c ee 4d 2d le 2a 2b Ca. Origin, &c. Co. Winged ray. Ti. Fe. | Ba. A very faint ray. Ti. Ti. Band. The interpolated wave- lengt hs and oscillation- frequencies of these rays are very doubtful. Pt, Mu. Groups. Group 2223. Strong. (4495°0) 4493°81 (4493°5) (44910) 4489-49 4484-96 4483'89 4483-09 } 4482-30 fo} (4481:3) 4481-00 4479°37 4475-49 4472:48 (4471°5) (4471-2) (4470°7) (4470°4) } 4469°54 Li as 2589°7 | (4465°2) | (4495'6) 26°7 27°42 29°67 30°21 30°60 31°00 31°5 31°64 32°46 34°39 35°90 36°4 36°5 36°83 369 OSCILLATION-FREQUENCIES OF SOLAR RAYS. CaTALoGvE (continued). Reduc- tion to va- cuum., 0°62 ” Inten- Frequency. ae width. 22933 | 2d 22241 | 1e 9294:66| Ge 90043 | 2b le lb Pry, tH 1b 3a 22261 | 3a lb 3a in 3a 222630 | 3a 2 2¢ 2299-05 | 3b 2229:59 | 4b 222998 | --- 3b 2230'37 { a 22309 | 2b 223101 | 3d 3b 2231'83 |{ 5, 293376 | Be 2935:27| 3d 22358 | la 2235:9 | la 2a 29362 |{ 22363 | la 8e 223674 |{. > 2238-48 ee 22389 | 1b Origin, &e. Fe. Possibly this may be the ray due to Mn instead of next. Mn. Fe, Mn. Fe. Fe. Fe. Ti, Doubtful whether ° Angstrém’s position is the mean of these. 77 Groups. Group 999"7. Faint. Group 2230, Strong. Group 2235. Strong. 78 ; Ang- Kirchhoff. | ot 5m, 259173 | 4464-09 25917 | (4463°8) 2 eo ea oe 9 a (4616) 6) ro ty } 4461-23 ee 9 2624°1 te ‘4 (4460: 7) 2597°7 ‘| (4460°3) 25985 | (4459°5) Gs oe |) aase72 25997 2600°6 | 2601"0 4457-83 2602°1 2602'9 26036 a 2604°0 2604'8 } 4455°38 fads } | 445416 2606°6 26071 =| (4453°6) 2608°2 | (4453-0) 26086 =| (4452°8) 2608'9 | (4452°6) 26102 |(4451°8) 2612°3. | 4450°50 2613°6 | (4449°8) 2614°1 444959 26165 |(4448°6) 2619°I 2619°9 }| 4447:07 2620°3 2622°3 Reci- procals. 2240°10 40°2 40°6 413 41°53 478 42°0 42'4 42°80 |. 43°24 REPORT—1878. CATALOGUE (continued). Reduc- tion to va- cuum, 0°63 22407 2239°47 2239°6 22400 2240°90 2241-2 2241-4 22418 224217 2242°61 2243°85 2249°46 2245°7 224631 2246°7 224677 2247 224804 Frequency. Inten- sity and width. 4a 2e te 2b 1 4a 4a 1 Mn. Band. Fe. Mn. Mn. Ca. Origin, &e. Groups. Group 2242. Strong. Mn, Ti. Double, Ang- strom 4442-40 || 443465 4431-48 4429:°97 (2° 4426-90 | \2650°7 ..° 4425-07 | \2653°2 | 72656°7 Bi.» 4429-12 2658°6 26649 1) 418.00 2665"9 2666-7 | (4417-4) 2667°6 ” }| 416-69 —2668°0 OSCILLATION-FREQUENCIES OF SOLAR RAYS. Reci- procals. 2251°03 54°97 Seppe 64°14 Reduc- tion to va- cuum., 0°63 ” CatTaLoeue (continued). Inten- sity and width. Frequency. Origin, &e. 5a 4a 2a 5b 2a 2250°40 It is not certain which of this pair is the ray of Ca, 225434 \° ° Not shown in Angstrom’s map. 225595 Fe. La, Di (Kirchhoff). Fe, Ti. } Ca. 4b 2g 5b 3¢ ld 5b 1 5 1b 2256°72 2258:29 2259°22 2260773 3a 3b 1b 2262-73 { 2263:2 3 2263°51 { rf Ti. 79 Groups. Group 2254. Faint. Group 2259. Strong. Group 2264. Strong. 80 Kirchhoff. 2670°0 26738 2674°5 2675°6 2676°5 2677°2 2679'0 2680°0 (oe 26812 2683°1 2686°0 Can eee 2688°4. 2690°8 ee 2692°3 2693°5 poor 2696°8 2698°2 2699'8 (ets 2702°1 Ges, (Se 279375 2703°8 ( to 27°49 (aee* 27977 2708'9 2709°6 2669°4 2678'4 } } i fe} Ang- strom, (4415-2) 4414°77 (4411: ) (4408'6) 4407-80 (4407-0) (4405'9) 4404-26 (4403°2) 4401-74 4400-78 4399 64 (4398-2) (4897-0) (4895°8) 4394-64 (4893-7) 4393°55 4393:03 Reci- procals. 2264°9 65°12 67°1 68°3 68°70 69°1 69°7 79°53 71 71°83 72°32 US 743 749 75°5° 76'0 76'06 76°33 (720% Reduc- Inten- ge Frequency. 4 Origin, &c. Groups. cuum. width. 063 | 22643 | 3b ; : Fe, Mn. Winged, chiefly ote 2264°48 | Ge { on less refrangible side. la Group 2269.| 2 Strong. 4a ar i Identification of Kirch- 22665 zeae hoff’s ray with Ang- 2a strém’s doubtful. la sat la 226777 2a 5b | Fe, Ca. 226806 Sb |Gs, x 2268°5 5a p 22691 4b 3e¢ ” 2269°89 |; 6f | Fe. Winged ray. 3e ” 2270°5 Ze : 5b | Fe, Ni. ” 22711 36 ” 227168 | Se ” 227227 | 4c 2 22731 1 Band. ” 2273°7 lf 1 i 3 |{ 2274 ” 3b 5 227486 | 4a 3b BS 22754 3a es 2275'42 1 Ti. 5 22'75°69 1f { 3a 4b 2b REPORT—1878. CaTaLoGuE (continued). OSCILLATION-FREQUENCIES OF SOLAR RAYS. 81 CaTaLoGuE (continued). x Reduc-| I nten- | 5 - Reci- {ti to it; Soe Kirchhoff. cum pegeslec "bes ° Frequency. eae Origin, &e. Groups. cuum. width. 6 3a | | 4389°48 | 227817 | 0°64 | 2277-53 Ca. 2710°9 lg 2711"9 4388:53| 78°67 | ,, 227803 | la | Fe. | 2712'8 2a | 27133 ee a. 3a 2714°3 | 438684) 79°54) », 227890 | 2a 2715°2 2b 2716°1 ld 2718°5 WR : : 3¢g Group 2281. : } peeedD | 80:63, | as 2279°99 {3 c | Ca. Strong. 2719°0 \ to | 1 2720°2 Winged ray. Wing to \ 2 Fe very broad on less 2720°3 refrangible side. to \ 4382:82| 8164 | ,, | 2281:00| 6 7G pale to | a Aas a #. 3 2722°8 ~ |(4382:1) 82°0 a 9981°4 2725°5 4380°49| 82°85 | ,, 2282:21 | 2d te 5°83 |(4380°3)| 82*9 a 2282°3 3a 27268 |(4379°8)| 83:2 3 2282°6 Qa 2728°0 | 4379:16| 83°54] ,, 228290 | 4b | Ca, Fe. 272874 lb 27298 2¢ 2730°7 1b 2731°6 4375-46 | 85°47 | ,, 228483 | ... | Ca, Fe. Group 2285. 2732°4 a “t9 oe le Faint. 2733°7 | 487422] 8612] ,, 2285-48 27341 3b Group 2288. ( 1 Faint. 2735°7 3b 2736°5 3b 27369 3b 2737'4 la 2737°8 2a } 2739°2 2c 2739°9 stk Sn “5 1b 27413 4370°60| 88:01 | ,, 928737 | 3d 82 REPORT—1878. CaTaLocuE (continued). PB _ |Redue- Inten- Kirchhoff. | 72° | srocais.| var /Freauency.| $y Origin, &e. cuum, width 27417 |(43870°4) | 2288: | 064 | 2287°5 3b ae (4369-4) | 88-6 3 2288'0 ihe 2744°1 4369°27| 88:71 | ,, 2288:07 | 4c | Cr, Fe. | Winged ray. 2744°3 |(43692)| 887 | , | 22881 | 1a aes \ | (4368-2) | 89:3 | ,, 2288:7 ci gee fee (4368:0)| 894 | ,, 2288'8 2747°6 | (4367-8) | 89°5 aA 2288°9 3a 2748'0 | 4867:°56| 8961] ,, 2288:°97 | 4c¢ | Be. 27498 | 436639] go0'22 | ,, 2289°58 | 3c 27506 |(4866:0)| 904 | ,, 22898 | 3a 2754°5 |(43863°7)| 91°6 * 2291°0 2¢ 2755°4 |(4363:2)| 919 | 5, 22913 | 1b 2755'8 | 486297] 92°02 | ,, 229138 | 2b 2756's |(4862°7)| 9g2°2 3 22916 le | (The interpolated wave- 27572 |(4362°0) | 92°5 ” 2291°9 Yo { ee ee ee 2759°4 |(4360°5)| 9373 ‘3 22927 | 1a | \ doubtful. 2760°r + |(4860-1)| 9375 a: 22929 | 2d 27606 |(43859:9)| 93°6 * 22930 | 2d 2762°0 | 4859°10} 94°05] ,, 229341 | 406 | Cr. 27638 | 435824] 94°50] ,, 229386 | 3f | Fe. 2767°2 1d | Jdentification of Kirch- 27682 | 435572) 95°33] |, 229519 | 2a hoff’s ray with Ang- strom’s doubtful. 2768°5 oe la 2770'°0 =| 4354-56) 9644] ,, 229580 | 2b a77o'8 |(43542)| 966 | , | 22960 | 2d]. 27740 | 485251] 97°52 | 5, 229688 | 5e (7% 4 4e | cp. 2775°7 }| 4351°86| 97°37] » 2297°23 |5 6c (ares 4¢ k 2777°3 || 485086) 9840 | » | 20776) 3a |{ NI Sac otthisray. 0 2s fe se ae 27778 to i 4350'4 | 2298°6 3 2298:0 | 1 | Band. 2778'5 corr deal ese 2781'2 4 2b 2782°2 3 1b 2782°9 ” 3b Groups. Group 2291. Faint. Group 2297. Strong, Kirchhoff. 2783'9 ea 2785°1 ot > ' ae 2809'0 ° Ang- strom. 4346-74 (4346'3) (4346°1) 4344-44 (4343-4) 4343-10 (43305) (4338-2) (4387°3) (4337-0) 4336-80 4335-15 4334-63 4332°72 OSCILLATION-FREQUENCIES OF SOLAR RAYS. CaTaLoeuE (continued). Reci- procals. 2300°57 008 009 O1'79 02°3 02°50 04°09 O51 0802 Reduc- tion to va- cuum. 0°64 0°64. Frequency. 2299°93 2300°2 2300°3 230114 23016 2301°85 2303-45 2303°7 2304°4 23049 23050 2305:20 230607 230635 2307°37 Inten- sit ail width. 1b le 2e lb 3c le 3b ——-\ bo x 83 Origin, &c. This hydrogen ray is sometimes called the ray G’. Groups. Group 2305 (the G'group). Very strong. | 84, Kirchhoff. to} Ang- strom. 4330°10 4325°24 4322°88 4320°33 4318-07 4316-69 4314-62 4313°76 4312-47 4311-73 Reci- procals. 2309'41 12°01 13°27 14°64. 15°85 16°59 17°70 18°86 19°25 RePorT—1878. CaTALOGUE (continued). 18°16 Reduc- tion to ae Frequency. cuum. 065 | 2308-76 ” 2311°36 » 2312°62 39 231399 » 2315°20 » 231593 »” 2317-05 ” 231751 ” 2318°21 » | 281860 Inten- sity and width. 2b 2a 2a 2a le & 8 Bopbw Bo @® Ww bw Q o Origin, &e. Identification of Ang- strom’s ray with Kirch- hoff’s very doubtful. | Fe. Winged ray. \ It is uncertain whe- | ther K 2825-9 or K 2826°5 is the Titanium,line mea- Ti. sured by Angstrom. Ti. Ca. Fe. i: Ti. Groups. Group 2313. Very strong. Group 2321 (theG Group). Very strong. OSCILLATION-FREQUENCIES OF SOLAR RAYS. CATALOGUE (continued). 85 A . |Redue- Inten- Kirchhoff. ant Sree ‘bea ® Frequency. an Origin, &e. cuum. width. '2846°9 ac “ea 0 so: 4c to io mot) << oes 1 2847°7 4a to 2 2848'0 4a » | 2 2848°4 mae Ae Ki 3b to | eee ase wats 2 2848°9 7 soe es 3b to | sot = see 2 2849°3 3b to | 2 2849°8 3b to | 2 2850°2 4 3b to } 2 2850°7 + 3b to | 2 2851°1 3b. to | 2 2851°6 3b to | 2 2852'0 els wae aah 4a to a8 Aa nes baa 2 2852°3 4a to | 1 285371 to 3 2853°6 to ; . 4 2854°1 to 4307-25 | 2321°67 | o'65 | 232102] 6 G. Fe, Ti. 2854°7 to | . eee 4 2855°2 J to } ad 3 Groups. 86 REPORT—1878. CATALOGUE (continued). Kirchhoff. 28722 4305°30 4301-95 4300°66 4298°56 4297°65 4296°77 4295-03 4293-96 4292-08 4290-70 4289-44 4288°78 4287-47 Reduc- Inten- Reci- | tion to 1 procals.| va- [Freauency-) and cuum, width. 2322°72 | 0°65 2322-07 ae 3 1 2 1 4b 3b it 3b 4 nee ake 5b ZAR N55 2323°88| 4b Se ar 4e¢ 25°22) » 232457 2 b 2 44 53 4c¢ 26°36 | 5 232571 e c 26°85 | 5, 232620| 4d 27°33 ” 2326°68 28°27 | 5 232762 | 3b 28°85 | 5 2328-20 | 5c 29°87 | 2329:22 | 3b 30°62 *f 9329:97 | 3c 31°31 ‘ 2330°66 | 3b 31°67 | ,, 2331-02 | 2a 32°38 |, 233173 | 4a Fe, Cx. Fe, Ca. ( Kirchhoff records Fe. five other rays in this region, viz. 2873°4 (2b), 2873°9 (2b), 2874°3 (3b), 2874°7 (2b), and 2875°2 (4c), on a background of in- tensity 1. Groups. Group 2381. Faint. Kirchhoff. OSCILLATION-FREQUENCIES OF SOLAR RAYS. CaTaLOGuE (continued), 87 ° Ang- strom. 4283'98 4282°23 4280°51 4279°67 427696 4274-63 4273°05 4271°33 4269-51 4267-75 4263°97 4261-42 4260-02 4258'43 4255-38 4253-90 4252-45 4250°54 4249-81 4248-16 4246°89 4245-20 4243°12 4241-92 4238°75 4236°66 4235°56 Reci- procals. 233428 42°19 43°15 45°23 46°64 47°41 48°28 49°97 50°78 51°58 52°64 53°05 53°96 54°66 55°60 56°76 57°42 59°19 60°35 60°96 Reduc- Inten- tion to sity ya. \Freauency.| onq cuum. width 0°65 2333°63| 1b 0°65 | 2334°58 0°66 233551] la la » | 238597 |{5, 99 233745 | 1b 9 2338°72| Ge ” 233959 | 1b 58 6f » | 934053 |] 4. ” 234153 | 4a i: 2342.49 | 5a oe Qa » | a3aae7|{ 234598) la ” 2346:75.| Ge 0 234762 | 2a 3 234931 | la “r 235012 | 6d ” 2350:92| lg “6 235198 | 5d 9 2352'39 | 4d 39 235330 | 3b ” 235400} 5c ” 235494 | 5e ” 2356:10| 5d 2 235676 | 4d ” 2358:53 | 5e 9 2359°69 | 3d 6e 99 2360°30 on 4g Ca. (re Origin, &e, Probably the mean of a pair. Mn. } Mean of a pair. Ca, Cr. Ti. Fe, Ca. Fe. Doubleray. Kach component wing- ed on both sides. Triple ray. Fe. Fe. i } Double ray. Fe. Fe. Are Between these two other rays, Fe and Fe, Ca. Fe. Groups. Group 2335. Faint. Group 2340. Faint. Group 2347. Faint. Group 2350. aint. Group 2359. Strong. 88 A Reci , ng- eci- Kirchhoff. strom. | procals. 4233°00 | 2362°39 a 422916] 64°53 422636 6610 4224:22| 67°30 ae 4222'88| 68:05 4221-71) 68-71 ets 4218°34| 70°60 oe 4216°58| 71°59 4215°33| 72°29 4213'43| 73°36 420990] 75°35 4206:25| 77°41 4204:55| 78°37 4203:29| 79°09 4201°56| 80°07 4200°27| 80°80 a 419813) 82-01 4197-98 | 82°10 4196°52} 82°93 4195°42| 83°55 4194°73| 83°94 + 4191°17| 85°97 eee 4188°48| 87°50 REPORT— 1878. CaraLoGvE (continued). Reduc- Inten- tion to sity aie Frequency. and cuum. width. 0°66 | 2361:37 | 6b 3 2363°87 | 5b eat ee es ene ” 2365-44 on 4g ” 2366°64 | la ” 2367°39 2b ” 2368°05 | 5d 0°66 | 236994 | 5a 0°67 237092 | 3b f 237162 | Ge ” 23'72°69 2 a ” 237468 5 c ” 2376°74 | 4b » 237842 | la 6b ” 2379-40 on 2g ” 2380138} 4¢ ” 238134 5 a 4a 43 » | 238143 |{ oa ” 2382.26 1 a , | 288288] 2a ” 2383°27 | 4a 6a ” 2385'30 3 4f ” 2386:83 | 3 a Origin, &c. Groups. Fe, Ca. Group 2363. fo. Faint. g- Ca. Winged on both | G72uP 2867. sides. Very strong. ee Not in Angstrém’s map. fo} Not in Angstrém’s map. Fe. Fe, Group 2371. Faint. Between these a ray Ca. of Fe. Fe. ' Fe. | Between these two Fe other rays of Fe. * | Between these a ray Fe. of Fe. Fe. Group 2380.. Strong. |e Winged ray. Fe. Fe. Fe. Double and nebulous. Between these a ray of Fe. Fe. ——— | Between these a ray of Ca. Group 2387. Fe. Strong. Ca, | Double ray. OSCILLATION-FREQUENCIES OF SOLAR RAYS. 89 CaTALOGUE (continued). 5 _ |Redue- Tnten- | Kirchhoff. ay aed iF i i Frequency. on Origin, &e. Groups. cuum. width. ; | ; oe tS ee eemeress |. te See 4187718 | 2388°24. | 0°67 238757 | 5f | Fe. \ 4186°68 88°53 nf 2387'86 5d | Fe. j Double winged ray. | Between these a ray H J of Fe, Ti $y« 418353} 90°33 + 238966 | 2b Group 2392. Qa | Faint. 418135} 9157 |_,, 90 ie 91°57 2390°9 ae | Fe. 417885] 93°00] ,, 239253 | 4e ( Fe. The least refrangible |Group 2395. 2393'33 | 5e | ] of a group of four rays Hain: of Fe. 4177-10] 94:00] ,, 4171-77 | 2397°06 | ,, 2396°39 ep Fe. 3g | Fe, Ti. geet these a 4166°64|2400'01 | ,, 2399:34 | 5e | Fe. ray of Fe. 4164-95] co'99 | _,, 2400°32| 3c | 4163:14| 02°03 | _,, 240136 | 4c | Ti. b 4160:87| 03°34] ,, 94.0267 an } Double, nebulous. 4158:52| 04°70 03 { et Fa 35 2404 oe. 4157-43! 05°33 | 067 | 940466] 5d | Fe. F 4155°74| 0631 | 0-68 | 9405-68 {ie hes ai 4b | Fe. 4153°79| 07:44 | ,, 2406°76 |4 4b | Fe. 5e | Fe 415153] 0875 |, 2408:07| Ge | Fe. | 4150°36 09°43 ” 2408°75 4d | Fe. | 4148-60] 1045] ,, 2409°77 | 4e¢ | Fe. 4147-10| 11°32 | ,, 2410°64 | 2b | Fe. | -—|—__}—_ , — |_| —| 6f | Fe. _ | Group 2413. 414314] 13°63 | ,, | 24te95 |{” ki Scan ot bs sce GB | / ib | 4141-73, x445| ,, | 2413-77 { aff . | 413926! 589, | 2415-21 { vhs | | . 90 REPORT—1878. CaTaLoavE (continued). a Reduc- Inten- : Ang- Reci- | tion t i ae Kirchhoff. Avi eceal ea ° |rrequency. anal Origin, &e. Groups. cuum width, 2a 4136°36|2417°58 | 068 | 2416:90 { as 4b ; G ! ie 4133-94 T9700))||";; 9418'32 {i b \ Fe. Winged double ray. ee z | Between thesetwo rays of Fe, eis 4131-52 20°42 aA 2419'74 | Ge | Fe, Ca. J) Winged ray. BG.) M1 e7 Daily heaton Ins 23 | { rea rye 242223 4c | Fe. 2 ty AI25'G6)|) 23°85 ;, 242317 ie 2a 6 4122°83) 25°52: | 4 9494°84| 3a | Fe, | ... | 4121-58] 2628] ,, | 242560] 4b | Fe. .. | 4120°57] 26°85 | ,, 2426-17 | 4b | Fe. ee 3 ‘ Ga Fe. Closely double ray. a SUE (8 |) 28°49), 242751 { 5a } Both may be Fe. ek 1 at 6b u ea Group 2439 oe 4101-20} 3831] ,, 243763 jen fe et Winged on both (the pyeen sides. ; 4g Very strong. we 4097°55| 40°48 | 0°68 2439°80 | 3 Ca, Fe. eee 409564] 4162 | 069 | 244093) 3b | Ca. cae 4094:59| 42°25] ,, 2441:56 | 4d aan 4091°87] 43°37] ., 2443:18| 5¢ | Ca. Mee 4089°81] 45710] ,, 9444-41] Qa ee 408417} 4848 / ,, 9447°79 | 4c | Fe. Group 2448. Between these two Faint. —— ara a ea ead | rays of Mn. oo ABs 4079-68} 5117 | ,, 245048] 4f i eG Group 2453. ; ; ? ‘a, Winged, especially on Strong. a SEITE 52°75 dee 245205 | 4f less refrangible side. : 3 .. | 407635) 5317], | 245248] {2 |} ¥e. Closely double. Ba eS 407100} 5640] ,, 245571 | 6g | Fe. Winged on both sides. | Group 2458. Qa ; Strong. ‘ie 4066:33| 59°22 | ,, 9458'53 re i Fe. aa Fe, Mn. Wing t] . | 4062-90] 6130 | ,, | 2460°61| 6g } Ao. OSCILLATLON-FREQUENCIES OF SOLAR RAYS. 91 CArALoGvUE (continued). ° | Reduc- Inten- z Ang- Reci- |tion to sity Kiechhoff. strom. | procals. | va- Frequency.) and cuum. | width. ces 4057-22 | 2464°74. | 0°69 2464°05 | Ga 405448 66°41 | 0°69 2465:'72| 5a ns 4051°75| 68-07 | 0°70 2467°37 | 2a 4048:22} 7022] ,, 9469°52 | 5b cow 4045°10} = 72°13 Pr 247143 | 6¢ j °6¢ es 4040:13| 75°17] ,, 2474-47 { 3a sale 4033:92| 78°98 | ,, 247828] Ge ae 4029°50| 81°70] ,, 2481:00 | Ge 5 4024-45 84°82 He 9484:12| 4b ore 4020°27| 87°39 | ,, 248669 | 5e Me, 401678} 89°56) ,, 2488°86 | 4¢ See 400490} 96:94 | ,, 249624 6¢g | we 4001°35 | 2499°03 | _, 2498°33 | 3b iss 3997°98 | 2501°36 | o'70 250066 | 4¢ | 396810] 20°10 | 071 2519'39 | 6 893300} 42°59 | ,, 254188 | 6 Origin, &e. Groups. Group 2466. Fe, Mn. oe Fe. Mn. Fe. Winged on both sides. | Group 2473. A ' Strong. \ Triple. Fe. Mn.) Between these two | Group 2480. rays of Mn and one Strong. | of Fe. Mn.} Wing on more re- frangible side. Fe. Fe. Fe. Close double ray. Fe. Winged, especially on | Group 2498. | less refrangible side. Strong. Fe. Fe. (Very strong ne-| Group 2530 bulous wings on | (the great H H.,Fe,| both sides of Group). Very Gu each of these strong. 4 rays. Many rays H,, Fe, | between them, Ca. especially two rays of Al, both \ winged. 92 REPORT—1878. Report of the Committee, consisting of Professor Caytuy, Dr. Farr, Mr. J. W. L. Guatsuer, Dr. Poin, Professor Futter, Professor A. B. W. Kernnepy, Professor Ciirrorp, and Mr. C. W. Murri- FIELD, appointed to consider the advisability and to estimate the expense of constructing Mr. Bansacu’s Analytical Machine, and of printing Tables by its means. Drawn wp by Mr. Merrirrex. WE desire in the first place to record our obligations to General Henry Babbage for the frank and liberal manner in which he has assisted the Committee, not only by placing at their disposal all the information with- in his reach, but by exhibiting and explaining to them, at no small loss of time and sacrifice of personal convenience, the machinery and papers left by his father, the late Mr. Babbage. Without the valuable aid thus kindly rendered to them by General Babbage it would have been simply impos- sible for the Committee to have come to any definite conclusions, or to present any useful report. We refer to the chapter in Mr. Babbage’s ‘ Passages from the Life of a Philosopher,’ and to General Menabrea’s paper, translated and annotated by Lady Lovelace, in the third volume of Taylor’s ‘ Scientific Memoirs,’ for a general description of the Analytical Engine. I. The General Principles of Calculating Engines. The application of arithmetic to calculating machines differs from or- dinary clockwork, and from geometrical construction, in that it is essen- tially discontinuous. In common clockwork, if two wheels are geared together so as to have a velocity ratio of 10 to 1 (say), when the faster wheel moves through the space of one tooth, the angular space moved through by the slower wheels is one-tenth of a tooth. Now in a calcu- lating machine, which is to work with actual figures and to print them, this is exactly what we don’t want. We require the second wheel not to move at all until it has to make a complete step, and then we require that step to be taken all at once. The time can be very easily read from the hands of a clock, and so can the gas consumption from an ordinary counter; but a moment’s reflection will show what a mess any such ma- chinery would make of an attempt at printing. This necessity of jumping discontinuously from one figure to another is the fundamental distinction between calculating and numbering machines on the one hand, and millwork or clockwork on the other. A parallel distinction is found in pure mathematics, between the theory of numbers on the one hand, and the doctrine of continuous variation, of which the Differential Calculus is the type, on the other. A calculating machine may exist in either case. The common slide-rule is, in fact, a very power- ful calculating machine in which the continuous process is used, and the planimeter is another. Geometrical construction, being essentially continuous, would be quite out of place in the calculating machine which has to print its results. Linkwork also, for the same reason, is out of place as an auxiliary in any form to the calculation. It may be of service in simplifying the construc- tion of the machine ; but it must not enter into the work as an equivalent for arithmetical computation, ON BABBAGE’S ANALYTICAL MACHINE. ~ 93 The primary movement of calculating engines is the discontinuous train, of which one form is sketched in the accompanying diagram (fig. 1): —B is the follower, an ordinary spur wheel with (say) 10 teeth; A is its driver, and this has only a single tooth. With a suitable proportion of parts, the single tooth of A only moves B one interval for a whole revolution of A; for it only gears with B by means of this single tooth. When that is not in gear, A simply slips past the teeth of B without moving the latter. All the other machinery of calculating engines leads up to and makes use of this, or of some transformation of it, as its means of dealing with units of whatever decimal rank, instead of allowing indefinite fractions of units to appear in the result which has to be printed from. Fig. 1. The primary operation of calculation is counting: the secondary opera- tion is addition, with its counterpart, subtraction. The addition and sub- traction are in reality effected by means of counting, which still remains the primary operation; but the necessity for economising labour and time forces upon us devices for performing the counting processes in a summary manner, and for allowing several of them to go on simultaneously in the calculating engine. For, if we use simple counting as our only operation, and suppose our engine set to 2312 (say), then, in order to add 3245 to it by mere repetition, we have 3245 unit operations to perform, and this is practically intolerable. If, however, we can separate the counting, so as to count on units to units only, tens to tens only, hundreds to hundreds only, and so forth, we shall only have 842+4+4+5=14 turns of the handle, as against 3245 turns. In general terms the number of operations will be measured by the sum of the digits of the number, instead of by the actual number itself. This is exactly analogous to what we should do ourselves in ordinary arithmetic in working an addition sum, if we had not learnt the addition table, but had to count on our fingers in order to add. This statement of the work is, however, incom- plete. In the first place the convenience of machinery obliges us to pro- _ vide 10 steps for each figure, whatever it may be, and there must be an arrangement by which the setting of the figure to be added shall cause a wheel to gain ground by so many steps as the number indicates, and to mark time without gaining ground for the other steps up to 10. Thus, in adding 7 our driver must make a complete turn or 10 steps, equivalent to 1 step of the follower; but only 7 of these steps of the driver must be effective steps, the others being skipped steps. There are various devices for this. One of the simplest and most direct is that used in Thomas’s 94 REPORT—1878. ‘Arithmométre ;’* another is the Reducing Bar used by Mr. Babbage. In the second place, the carrying has to be provided for just as in ordinary addition of numbers. Taking account of all this, it follows that by separating the counting on the whole into counting on figure by figure, * Let ZO (fig. 2) be a plate with ten ribs of different lengths, Aa, Bd,.... Kk soldered on it. Let Mm be a square axis on which the wheel N is made to slide by the fork P. Then, supposing N to have teeth which can engage in the ribs Aa, &c., when the plate is pushed past the wheel N, the number of teeth through which the wheel N, carrying with it the shaft Mm, is made to rotate, depends upon the number of ribs in which it engages, and this depends upon how far along the axis N is made to slide by means of the fork P. If this fork is set opposite the line marked 3, Mm will turn through a space equivalent to 3 teeth. If a wheel, keyed to the shaft Mm, be geared to other wheels, this enables us to add any digit to any number ata single motion of the plate, by simply changing the position of P to suit the digit required. This is the principle used in Thomas’s arithmométre, only that there the traversing plate is replaced by a rotating cylinder. tT Suppose Aa, Bd, ... . Ff (fig. 3) to be a series of racks passing hrough mor- tices in a plate wz, and meeting a series of spur-wheels mounted loose n a shaft, so that each wheel gears with one of the racks at the line yg, and that 11 the whole series can be thrown in or out of gear together. Starting with them out of gear, let the racks be drawn out through the plate wz as indicated. Next throw the shaft pq into gear, and then press a plate PQ against the ends of the racks, pushing them back until the plates PQ and zz meet. Then each wheel on pg will turn through the number of teeth corresponding to the original projection of the racks. In this way, if the wheels on pg stood at any given number, say 543243, we should have added 314236 to them, and they would then stand at the sum of these two numbers, namely, 857479. This, it will be observed, makes no provision for carrying, PQ is ON BABBAGE’S ANALYTICAL MACHINE. 95 the number of separate steps is reduced from that expressed by the number itself to eleven times the number of its digits; that is to say, for example, the addition of the number 73592 to any other number is reduced from 73592 to 55 steps, and although of this latter some are slipped, there is no gain of time thereby, except in so far as several of the steps may be made simultaneously. The ordinary engines beat the human calculator in respect of adding all the figures simultaneously ; but Mr. Babbage was the first to devise a method of performing all the carrying simultaneously too. Mechanical invention has not yeti gone beyond the reduction of the distinct steps involved in the addition of a number consisting of n digits to less than 11; practically, from the necessity of accompanying the carrying with a warning step, rather more are required. In all the calculating machines at present known, including Mr. Babbage’s analytical engine, multiplication is really effected by repeated addition. It is true that, bya multiplication of parts, more than one addi- tion may be going on simultaneously ; but it yet remains true, asa matter of mechanism, that the process is purely one of iterated addition. By means of reversing wheels or trains, subtraction is as easily and directly performed as addition, and that without becoming in any degree atentative process. But it is important to observe that the process can be made tentative, so as to give notice when a minuend is, or is about to become, exhausted. This is the necessary preparation for division, which is thus essentially a tentative process. That does not take it out of the power of the machine, because the machine may be, and is, so devised as to accept and act upon the notice. Nevertheless it isa step alient generis from the direct processes of addition, multiplication, and subtraction. It need hardly be stated that the process of obtaining a quotient consists in counting the number of subtractions employed, up to the machine giving notice of the minuend being exhausted. Another essentially distinct train is involved in the decimal shift of the unit, in all the four elementary rules. This is most simply and most commonly effected by the sliding of an axis or frame longitudinally, after the manner of a common sliding-scale or rule, so as to bring either the figures, or the teeth which represent them, against those to which their decimal places correspond, and to no others. In multiplication and divi- sion, this means a shift for each step of the multiplication and division. II. Special Characteristics of Mr. Babbage’s Analytical Engine. 1. The mill_—The fundamental operation of Mr. Babbage’s analytical engine is simple additition. This and the other elementary rules of sub- traction, multiplication, and division, and all combinations of these, are performed in what is called “‘the mill.’’ All the shifts which have to take place, such as changing addition into subtraction by throwing a reversing train into gear, or the shift of the decimal place, carrying and borrowing, _ and so forth, are effected by a system of rotating cams acting upon or the reducing bar. In practice the arrangement is usually circular, the bar PQ revolving about an axis parallel to itself instead of sliding. If the numbers on the wheels pq are placed one way we get addition; if reversed, subtraction. Otherwise we may reverse by introducing an additional set of wheels between the wheels pq and the racks. This is the bare principle, admitting of many transformations, and making, like the other, no provision for carrying. 96 REPORT—1878. actuated by bell-cranks, tangs, and other similar devices commonly used in shifting machinery, sometimes under the name of clutches or escape- ments. These clutches and bell-cranks control the purely additive and carrying processes effected in the additive trains described in the note to § L., and, being themselves suitably directed, secure that the proper processes shall be performed upon the proper subject-matter of operation, and duly recorded, or used, as may be required. ’ 2. The store—A series of columns, each containing a series of wheels, constitutes the store. This store, which may be in three or more dimen- sions, both receives the results of operations performed in the mill, and serves as astore for the numbers which are to be used in the mill, whether as original or as fresh subjects of operation in it. Hach column in the store corresponds to a definite number, to which it is set either automati- cally or by hand, and the number of digits in this number is limited by the number of wheels carried on the shaft of the column. The wheels gear into a series of racks, which can be thrown into or out of gear by means of the cards. 3. Variable cards.—All the numbers which are the subject of operation in the mill, whether they are the result of previous operations therein, or new numbers to be operated upon for the first time, are introduced to it in the form of Jacquard* cards, such as are used in weaving. One set of wires or axes transfers the numbers on these cards to the subject of ope- ration in the mill, exactly as similar cards direct which of the warp threads are to be pushed up, and which down, in the Jacquard loom. The mill itself punches such cards when required. 4, Operation cards.—A different set of cards selects and prescribes the sequence of operations. These act, not upon the number wheels of the mill or store, but upon the cams and clutches which direct the gearing of these wheels and trains. Thus, in such an operation as (ab + c) d, we should require :— Ist, 4 variable cards with the numbers a, 6, ¢, d. 2nd, an operation card directing the machine to multiply a and b together. 8rd, a record of the result, namely the product ab =p, as a fifth variable card. Ath, an operation card directing the addition of p and c. 5th, a record of the result, namely the sum p+c=q, as a 6th variable card, 6th, an operation card directing the machine to multiply “g and d together. 7th, a record of the result, namely the product gd=p», either printed as a final result or punched in a seventh variable card. * In a letter written by Mr. Babbage to Arago in December 1839, the following explanation of the use of these cards is given. It probably conveys the idea in the fewest words possible. It is only necessary to add that their twofold employment embodies the separation of the symbols of operation from those of quantity. “You are aware that the system of cards which Jacquard invented are the means by which we can communicate to a very ordinary loom orders to weave any pattern that may be desired. Availing myself of the same beautiful invention, I have by similar means communicated to my calculating engine orders to calculate any formula however complicated; but I have also advanced one stage further, and I have communicated through the same means orders to follow certain laws in the use of those cards, and thus the calculating engine can solve any equations, eliminate between any number of variables, and perform the highest operations of analysis.” ON BABBAGE’S ANALYTICAL MACHINE. 97 ILI. Capability of the Engine. It has already been remarked that the direct work of the engine is a combination and repetition of the processes of addition and subtraction. But in leading up to any given datum by these combinations, there is no difficulty in ascertaining tentatively when this datum is reached, or about to be reached. This isstrictly a tentative process, and it appears probable that each such tentamen requires to be specially provided for, so as to be duly noted in the subsequent operations of the machine. There is, how- ever, no necessary restriction to any particular process, such as division ; but any direct combination of arithmetic, such as the formation of a poly- nomial, can be made to lead up toa given value in such a manner as to yield the solution of the corresponding equation. In any such process, how- ever, it is evident that there can be only (to choose a simile from mechanism) one degree of freedom ; otherwise the problem would yield a locus, inde- terminate alike in common arithmetic, and as regards the capabilities of the machine. The possibility of several roots would be a difficulty of exactly the same character as that which presents itself in Horner’s solu- tion of equations, and the same may be said of imaginary roots differing but little from equality. These, however, are extreme cases, with which it is usually possible to deal specially as they arise, and they need not be considered as detracting materially from the value of the engine. Theo- retically, the grasp of the engine appears to include the whole synthesis of arithmetic, together with one degree of freedom tentatively. Its capa- bility thus extends to any system of operations or equations which leads to a single numerical result. It appears to have been primarily designed with the following general object in view—to be coextensive with numerical synthesis and solution, without any special adaptation to a particular class of work, such as we see in the difference engine. It includes that @ majori, and it can either calculate any single result, or tabulate any consecutive series of results just as well. But the absence of any speciality of adaptation is one of the leading features of the design. Mr. Babbage had also considered the indication of the passage through infinity as well as through zero, and also the approach to imaginary roots. For details upon these points we must refer to his ‘ Passages from the Life of a Philosopher.’ IV. Present state of the Design. The only part of the analytical engine which has yet been put together is a small portion of ‘“ the mill,”’ sufficient to show the methods of addition and subtraction, and of what Mr. Babbage called his “anticipating car- riage.’ It is understood that General Babbage will (independently of this report) publish a full account of this method. No further mention - of it will therefore be made here, A small portion of the work is in gun-metal wheels and cranks, mounted for the most part on steel shafts. But the greater part of the | wheels are in a sort of pewter hardened with zinc. This was adopted from motives of economy. They are for the most part not cast, but moulded by pressure, and the moulds of most of them are in existence. _ A large number of drawings of the machinery are also in existence. It is Ape that these are complete to the extent of giving an account of : H 98 REPORT— 1878, every particular movement essential to the design of the engine; but, for the most part, they are not working drawings, that is to say, they are not drawings suited to be sent straight to the pattern or fitting shop, to be rendered in metal. There are also drawings for the erection of the engine, and there appears to be a complete set of descriptive notes of it in Mr. Babbage’s ‘‘ mechanical notation.” There remains, however, a great deal to be done in the way of calculating quantities and proportions, and in the preparation of working drawings, before any work could actually be set in hand, even if the design be really complete. There issome doubt on this pointas the matter stands, and it certainly would be unsafe to rely upon the design being really complete, until the working drawings had been got out. Mechanical engineers are well aware that no complex design can be trusted without this test, at least. Tt was Mr. Babbage’s rule, in designing mechanism, in the first place to work to his object, in utter disregard of any questions of complexity. ‘This is a good rule in all devising of methods, whether analytical, mechanical, or administrative. But it leaves in doubt, until the design finally leaves the inventor's hands in a finished state, whether it really represents what is meant to be rendered in metal, or whether it is simply a provisional solution, to be afterwards simplified. V. Probable Cost. Tt has not been possible for us to form any exact conclusion as to the -gost. Nevertheless there are some data in existence which appear to fix a lower limit to the cost. Mr. Babbage, in his published papers, talks of having 1,000 columns of wheels, each containing 50 distinct wheels; this apparently refers to his store. Besides the many thousand moulded pewter wheels for these, and the axes on which they are mounted, there is the mill, also consisting of a series of columns of wheels and of a vast machinery of cams, clutches, and cranks for their control and connection, ‘so as to bring them within the directing power of the Jacquard systems of variable cards and operation cards. Without attempting any exact estimate, we may say that it would surprise us very much if it were found possible to obtain tenders for less than 10,0001, while it would pretty certainly cost a considerable sum to put the design in a fit state for obtaining tenders. On the other hand, it would not surprise us if the cost were to reach three or four times the amount above suggested. It is understood that towards the close of his life Mr. Babbage had contemplated carrying out the manufacture of the engine on a smaller scale, confining himself to 25 figures instead of 00, and to 200 columns instead of 1000 or more. This would of course reduce the amount of the metal-work proportionately, but we do not think that it would mate- rially reduce the charge which we anticipate for bringing the design into working order. VI. Strength and Durability. The questions of strength and durability had by no means escaped Mr. Babbage’s attention, and a great deal of his detail bears marks of having been designed with especial reference to these two points. That was essential in a large amd complex engine with some thousands of wheels, all requiring at some time or other, although not simultaneously, to be driven by the means of one shaft, This necessarily throws a great deal of pressure, and also a great deal of wear and tear, on the main driving shaft ON BABBAGE’S ANALYTICAL MACHINE. 99 and the gear immediately connected with it. We have no means of knowing, in the present state of the design, to what extent Mr. Babbage had succeeded in reducing this, or whether he had always been successful in arranging his cams and cranks so as to secure the best working angles, and to avoid their being jammed at dead points or otherwise. Giving him full credit for being quite aware of the importance of this, we cannot but doubt whether the design was ever in a sufficiently forward state to enable him, or any one else, to speak with certainty on this point. Several of the existing calculating machines show signs of weakness in the driving-pinions. One of the movements apparently necessary to the tentative processes of the engine is, when the spur-wheels on a given shaft have been brought into certain definite positions depending on previous operations, to bring up a sharp straight edge against’ them in a plane passing through the axis of the shaft. This pushes some to right and others to left, according to the position of the crown of the tooth relatively to the straight edge. This operation is necessary to secure that the clearance of the different parts of the machinery, whether originally provided in order to allow it to work smoothly, or whether afterwards increased by working, shall not introduce a numerical error into the result. The principle of this operation is used generally throughout the analytical engine. Its consequent effect, both in respect of the work which it throws upon the main driving gear, and of the wear of the parts which it pushes, forms an important element in considering the durability of the machine. This bar also serves the purpose of locking part of the machine when required. On the other hand, it is to be remarked, that the use of springs has been wholly discarded by Mr. Babbage, as directors of motion, although he occasionally uses them for return motions. VIL. Probable utilization of the Analytical Engine. It has been already remarked that one of the main features of the engine is, that its function is coextensive with numerical synthesis and solution, and that there is an absence of any special adaptation. In thus widening the sphere of its capability, it is made to diverge from the general tendency of mechanical design, which is towards the selection and particularization of the work to be performed, and the restriction of the machinery to one particular cycle of operation, usually within close numerical limits, as well as limited in kind. Nevertheless, modern engineering practice finds ample room for “universal” drills, shaping tools, and other machines having very general adjustments and appli- cations. But it remains practically true that each step of freedom of adjustment is also a step in diminution of special aptitude. While the analytical engine is capable of turning out a single result, as the combination of a complex series of numbers and operations per- formed upon them, it can also yield a series of such results in a consecutive form, and thus give tabulated results. Only it is not restricted, as is the difference engine, to the special method of tabulation by finite differences, nor is tabulation its primary function ‘or intention. If its actual capa- bilities are found to realize the intentions of its inventor, it will tabulate all functions which are within the reach of numerical synthesis, and those direct inversions of it which are known under the name of solutions. It deals, however, with number, and not with analytical form. H 2 100 REPORT—1878. Theoretically it might supersede the difference engine, @ majort; but for reasons already stated, the specialization of the difference engine would probably give it an advantage over the more powerful engine, when the work was specially suited to finite differences. There would remain much work, tabular and other, for which diffe- rences are not very directly suited. Among these may be mentioned the determination of heavy series of constants and of definite functions of them, such as Bernonlli’s numbers, 2a", coefficients of various expan- sions of functions, and inversions of known. expansions, solutions of simultaneous equations with large numerical coefficients and many variables, including, as a particular, but important case, the practical correction of observations by the method of least squares. [fall sorts of heavy work of this kind could be easily and quickly, as well as certainly, done, by merely selecting or punching a few Jacquard cards and turning a handle, not only much saving of labour would result, but much which is now out of human possibility would be brought within easy reach. If intelligently directed and saved from wasteful use, such a machine might mark an era in the history of computation, as decided as the intro- duction of logarithms in the seventeenth century did in trigonometricat and astronomical arithmetic. Care might be required to guard against misuse, especially against the imposition of Sisyphean tasks upon it by influential sciolists. This, however, is no more than has happened in the history of logarithms. Much-work has been done with them which could more easily have been done without them, and the old reproach is probably true, that more work has been spent upon making tables than has been saved by their use. Yet, on the whole, there can be no reason- able doubt: that the first calculation of logarithmic tables was an expen- diture of capital which has repaid itself over and over again. ‘So probably would the analytical engine, whatever its cost, if we could be assured of its success. VIII. Possible Modification of the Engine. Without prejudging the general question referred to us as to the advisability of completing Mr. Babbage’s engine in the exact shape in which it exists in the machinery and designs left by its inventor, it is open to consideration whether some modification of it, to the sacrifice of some portion of its generality, would not reduce the cost, and simplify the machinery, so as to bring it within the range of both commercial and mechanical certainty. The “mill,’’*for example, is an exceedingly good mechanical arrangement for the operations of addition and subtraction, and with a slight modification, with or without store-columns, for muiti- plication. We have already called attention to the imperfection of the existing machines, which show weakness and occasional uncertainty. It is at least worth consideration whether a portion of the analytical engine might not thus be advantageously specialized, so as to furnish a better multiplying machine than we at present possess. This, we have reason to believe, is a great desideratum both in public and private offices, as well as in aid of mathematical calculators. Another important desideratum to which the machine might be adapted, without the introduction of any tentative processes (out of which the complications of the machinery chiefiy arise) is the solution of simultaneous equations containing many variables. This would include ON BABBAGE’S ANALYTICAL MACHINE. 101 a large part of the caiculations involvéd in the practical application of the method of least squares. The solution of such equations can always be expressed as the quotient of two determinants, and the obtaining this quotient is a final operation, which may be left to the operator to perform by ordinary arithmetic, or which may be the subject of a separate piece of machinery, so that the more direct work of forming the deter- minant, which is a mere combination of the three direct operations of addition, subtraction, and multiplication, may be entirely freed from the tentative process of division, which would thus be prevented from compli- cating the direct machinery. In the absence of a special engine for the purpose, the solution of large sets of simultaneous equations is a most laborious task, and a very expensive process indeed, when it has to be paid for, in the cases in which the result is imperatively needed. An engine that would do this work at moderate cost would place a new and most valuable computing power at the disposal of analysts and physicists. Other special modifications of the engine might also find a fair field for reproductive employment. We do not think it necessary to go into these questions at any great length, because they involve a departure, in the way of restriction and specialization, from Mr. Babbage’s idea, of which generality was thesleading feature. Nevertheless, we think that we should be guilty of an omission, if we were to fail to suggest them for consideration. IX. General Conclusions, and Recommendation. 1. We are of opinion that the labours of Mr. Babbage, firstly on his Difference Engine, and secondly on his Analytical Engine, are a marvel of mechanical ingenuity and resource. 2. We entertain no doubt as to the utility of such an engine as was in his contemplation when he undertook the invention of his analytical engine, supposing it to be successfully constructed and maintained in efficiency. 8. We do not consider that the possibilities of its misuse are any serious drawback to its use or value. 4, Apart from the question of its saving labour in operations now possible, we think the existence of such an instrument would place within reach much which, if not actually impossible, has been too close to the limits of human skill and endurance to be practically available. 5. We have come to the conclusion that in the present state of the design of the engine it is not possible for us to form any reasonable estimate of its cost, or of its strength and durability. 6. We are also of opinion that, in the present state of the design, it is not more than a theoretical possibility; that is to say, we do not consider it a certainty that it could be constructed and put together soas to run smoothly and correctly, and to do the work expected of it. 7. We think that there remains much detail to be worked out, and possibly some further invention needed, before the design can be brought into a state in which it would be possible to judge whether it would really so work. 8. We think that a further cost would have to be incurred in order to bring the design to this stage, and that it is just possible that a mechanical failure might cause this expenditure to be lost. 9. While we are unable to frame any exact estimates, we have reason 102 “REPORT—1878. to think that the cost of the engine, after the drawings are completed, would be expressed in tens of thousands of pounds at least. 10. We think there is even less possibility of forming an opinion as to its strength and durability than as to its feasibility or cost. 11. Having regard to all these considerations, we have come, not without reluctance, to the conclusion, that we cannot advise the British Association to take any steps, either hy way of recommendation or other- wise, to procure the construction of Mr, Babbage’s Analytical Hngine and the printing tables by its means. 12. We think it, however, a question for further consideration whether some specialized modification of the engine might not be worth construction, to serve as a simple multiplying machine, and another modification of it arranged for the calculation of determinants, so as to serve for the solution of simultaneous equations. This, however, mas- much as it involves a departure from the general idea of the inventor, we regard as lying outside the terms of reference, and therefore perhaps rather for the consideration of Mr. Babbage’s representatives than ours. We accordingly confine ourselves to the mere mention of it by way of suggestion. Third Report of the Committee, consisting of Dr. Joutx, Professor Sir W. Tromson, Professor Tarr, Professor BaLrour Stewart, and Professor MaxweEtx, appointed for the purpose of determining the Mechanical Equivalent of Heat. Ir will not be necessary to make a long report to the Association this year. Dr. Joule has published a paper, giving in extenso the experiments summarized in the last two reports in the ‘ Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society,’ which was the medium of the publication of his former paper in 1850. The new restlt, which confirms the old one, gives 772°55 foot-pounds as the equivalent at the sea level and the latitude of Green- wich of the heat which can raise a pound of water, weighed in vacuo, frem 60° to 61° Fahr. of the mercurial thermometer, where the perma- nent freezing point is called 32°, and the permanent boiling point of water under a barometrical pressure of 30 inches of mercury raised to GO° Fahr. is 212°. The work at present in hand is a more accurate investigation of the true position of the freezing and boiling points of the thermometers when cleared from the effects of the imperfect elasticity of the glass of which they are constructed. The correction of the above equivalent which may thus accrue is not expected to be of considerable amount. ON ATMOSPHERIC ELECTRICITY. 103 Report of the Committee, consisting of Professor G. Forsus, Pro- fessor Sir Wint1am THomson, and Professor Evrerrrr, appointed for the purpose of making arrangements for the taking of cer- tain Observations in India, and Observations on Atmospheric Electricity at Madeira. Tue Committee has purchased three electrometers. These have been given, one to Surgeon-Major Johnson, in India; the second to Mr. Michie Smith, in India ; and the third to Dr. Grabham, in Madeira. Surgeon- Major Johnson was engaged in the frontier war in India; and Dr. Grab- ham has hitherto been too much occupied to make observations, while Mr. Michie Smith has not yet had time to furnish any. So that up to the present time no observations have been received. Your Committee feel confident of obtaining results from Mr. Smith, and hope also from the other observers, but in the event cf their being unable to furnish regular observations, your Committee would get the electrometers back and make them available for other persons. They propose that the Committee should be reappointed. Report of the Committee, consisting of Professor Sir WILLIAM Tomson, Professor Cuerk MAxweE tL, Professor Tarr, Dr. C. W. Siemens, Mr. F. J. Bramweii, Mr. W. Froups, and Mr. J. T. Borromury, for commencing Secular Experiments wpon the Elasticity of Wires. Drawn wp by J. T. Borromiey. Tue Committee have to report that the arrangements for suspending the wires for secular experiments on elasticity are now complete ; and that within the last few days two wires, one of palladium, and the other of platinum, have been suspended in their places. An iron tube has been erected in one of the rooms in the tower of the University buildings in Glasgow. It is 60 feet long, 9 inches wide, and 44 inches deep from face to hack. it is of rectangular section, in lengths ot 6 feet; and it is supported by being firmly attached to the heavy outer stone wall of the tower. At the top of the tube there is a heavy gun-metal plate, which is sup- ported independently of the iron tube; and from this plate the wires under examination are to be suspended, as weil as additional wires to be used for carrying additional comparison marks. With this arrangement no yielding of the supporting plate that may take place will introduce errors into the results of measurement of the lengths of the wires; for the point of support of the wire carrying comparison marks will expe- rience the same amount of lowering, due to the yielding, as is experienced by the wire to be measured against these marks. The gun-metal plate has been pierced with three rows of holes through which the wires are to pass. The holes are trumpeted at each end so as to avoid sharp con- tact with the wires, and the rows are arranged so that the wires shall hang down in planes parallel to the face of the tube. It has not yet been decided what is the best way of fixing the upper ends of the 104 REPORT—1878. wires above the gun-metal plate, or of attaching the weights to their lower ends. No thoroughly satisfactory mode of attachment has yet been found. In the course of experiments which have been carried on at Glasgow on the breaking weight, and the Young’s modulus of elasticity of the gold, platinum, and palladium wires, which it is: intended shall be first suspended for examination, several modes of suspension have been tried; but it has not been found possible to make sure of avoiding very considerable weakening of the wire at the points of attachment at the ends. At the bottom of the iron tube there is a window of plate glass through which the lower parts of the wires can be viewed, and the window can be drawn up so as to allow of the lower parts of the wires being reached. In front of the window a strong gun-metal table is set up. It is sup- ported, independently of the iron tube and of the floor of the room, on iron brackets fixed to the stone wall of the chamber, and is very carefully levelled. On this table a cathetometer is carried, by means of which marks on the wires are to be observed. The cathetometer moves on the table parallel to the planes of the rows of wires. It has the two back feet of the triangular sole-plate on which it is supported movable in a V-groove cut in the table, the third foot resting on the plane upper sur- face. There is also a slot cut in the table through which a screw passes up from below to the sole-plate of the cathetometer, and by means of this screw the cathetometer can be clamped in any required place. The catketometer is a small instrument which has been constructed by Mr. James White, of Glasgow. for the purpose of these experiments. The main pillar is 1 foot high. It is supported on a sole-plate having three levelling screws. The telescope or microscope, having cross fibres, is raised or lowered on this pillar on a proper geometrical slide, and has also a lifting screw in connection with a vernier for giving fine adjust- ment. The vertical pillar is carefully graduated ; and by means of this scale the differences of levels of proper marks put upon the wires are to be determined. The arrangements have only been completed within the last few days. They require to be carefully tested in several pvints, and particularly the cathetometer requires careful examination. There is every reason, how- ever, to expect that the work will turn out quite satisfactory. As soon as possible the work of testing will be completed and wires suspended, measured, and marked. , During the past year experiments in connection with this investiga- tion have been carried on in the laboratory of the University of Glasgow, on the breaking-weights and elastic properties of various wires. In the first place the breaking-weights and the Young’s modulus, or modulus of elasticity for longitudinal pull, have been determined for the gold, pla- tinum, and palladium wires, with which it is proposed that the secular experiments on elasticity shall commence. A large number of experi- ments on the effect of stress, maintained for a considerable time, in alter- ing the breaking weight and the extension under increased stress of various wires, have been carried on. Soft iron wire, steel wire, and tin wire in particular, have been experimented upon, and already some inte- resting results have been obtained, showing that prolonged application of stress certainly produces a noticeable effect. ON THE CHEMISTRY OF SOME OF THE LESSER-KNOWN ALKALOIDS. 105 Report of the Committee on the Chemistry of some of the lesser- known Alkaloids, especially Veratria and Bebeerine; the Com- mittee consisting of W. Cuanvier Rosurts, F'.R.S. (Sec.), Dr. C. R. Atprr Wrieut, and Mr. A. P. Lourr. Tue work at present completed has led to conclusions very diverse from those arrived at by previous experimenters who have partially examined the alkaloids contained in the seeds of Veratrum Sabadilla (Asagrwa officinalis) ; in consequence, other species of the Veratrum family (such as Veratrum album) are being investigated with a view to finding out how far the alkaloids therein contained are related to the bases found in V. _ Sabadilla. These investigations being at present incomplete, it would be premature.to report on them otherwise than in general terms. The same remark applies to Bebeerine ; the experiments with this alkaloid having at present led to little that is definite. Amongst other pharmaceutical and chemical researches on the alkaloids of Veratrum Sabadilla may be briefly mentioned those of Pelletier and - Caventou, who isolated in 1819 an amorphous alkaloid or alkaloidal mixture fusing at 50°; and of Couerbe, who, in 1834, obtained three alkaloidal bodies, one of which was amorphous, but yielded a crystalline sulphate ahd hydrochloride ; to this base he applied the term Veratrine. The second base isolated was soluble in water, and crystallisable there- from, and was termed by him Sabadilline; whilst the third substance was soluble in water, but non-crystallisable; this was termed by Couerbe Hydrate of Sabadilline. Later on, in 1855, Merck isolated from the amorphous mixture sold under the name of ‘‘ Veratria” an alkaloid readily erystallisable from alcohol, but forming salts quite uncrystallisable, the aurochloride excepted. Notwithstanding that this base differed entirely in properties from the Veratrine of Couerbe, Merck applied to it the same name, “ Veratrine,’ and ascribed to it the formula C3,H;,N.O,. In 1871 Weigelin, working in Dragendorft’s laboratory, obtained from V. Sabadilla three alkaloidal substances, one of which was apparently the Veratrine of Merck in an impure state; whilst the other two were soluble in water, and were termed respectively Sabadilline and Sabatrine. Within the last year or two, Schmidt and Képpen have re-examined the so-called ‘* Veratria ’’ of commerce, and have obtained from it and from Sabadilla seeds direct a crystallisable base, fusing at 205°, and evidently identical with the Veratrine of Merck. To this, however, they assign the formula, C,.H;,NO,, somewhat different from Merck’s formula, especially in the nitrogen. On working up a quantity of crushed Sabadilla seeds by percolating with alcohol acidulated with tartaric acid, evaporating to a small bulk, adding water, filtering from resin, and extraction of alkaloids by adding soda and shaking with large bulks of ether, we have obtained an alkaloidal mixture from which, by further operations, there have been separated three distinct alkaloids. As the process employed has been already described at length (‘Journal of the Chemical Society,’ 1878), it is un- necessary to repeat it here. One of these alkaloids melted at 205°-206°, crystallised finely from alcohol, formed a crystallised aurochloride, but no other crystalline salts, and was evidently identical with the Veratrine of Merck. The second did not crystallise itself, but formed a well-crystallised sulphate and hydro- 106 REPORT—1878. chloride, and was apparently identical with the Veratrine of Couerbe. The - third neither crystallised nor yielded crystalline salts, but was sharply dis- tinguished by its sparing solubility inether. Nothing agreeing in properties with the ‘ Sabadilline’ of Couerbe and of Weigelin could be found either in the alkaloids extracted from the seeds, in a quantity of the alkaloidal mix- ture sold commercially as “‘ Veratria,”’ oz, finally, in a substance purchased from Messrs. Burgoyne and Burbidges (Kahlbaum’s agents) as being Saba- dilline itself! This last substance consisted entirely of the third base above mentioned, the only point of similarity between it and ‘ Sabadilline’ - being very sparing solubility in ether. Each one of the three bases was saponified by alcoholic soda, the first and third apparently forming the same acid product which has been identified with the Methylerotonie Acid of Frankland and Duppa, and with the Cevadic Acid of Pelletier and Caventou; the second tase yielded, by similar treatment, Dimethylprotocatechwic Acid, identical with that similarly obtained from pseudaconitine, and, as Kérner has shown, identical with that isolated by Merck from V. Sabadilla seeds, and ‘ termed by him Veratric Acid. From these circumstances we propose to assign to the three bases respectively the following names. The for- mulz attached are those derived from our own analyses; in the case of the first base our numbers are practically identical with those of Merck and of Schmidt and Képpen, Merck’s nitrogen determination éxcepted. (1.) Cevadine, C3,HygNO,; the “ Veratrine”’ of Merck. We term this Cevadine because the prior right to the name, “ Veratrine,” rests with Couerbe’s base (vide infra), and because it forms Cevadic acid on saponi- fication, the reaction being C3.H,,NO, + 18G, = C;H,0, + C.-H,.NQ,. (2.) Veratrine, C,,H;,NO,,; the ‘ Veratrine’ of Couerbe. We term this Veratrine because, as just stated, the prior right to the name belongs to it, and because it forms Veratric acid on saponification; the reaction being ; C37H;3NO), + H.O = CoH, 0,4 + CogHy;NOs. (3.) Cevadilline, C3,H;,NO3. We term this Cevadilline because it exhibits a certain amount of similarity to the “ Sabadilline”’ described by Weigelin, and because it appears to form Cevadic acid on saponification. The basic complementary products formed by saponification from these three bases we propose to term respectively Cevine, Verine, and Cevilline. Cevine and Verine are non-crystalline, and mach resembie one another. When Cevadic acid is heated with fusing potash, hydrogen is evolved, and acetic and propionic acids formed. As Cevadic acid melts at 64°-65°, its identity with the Methylcrotonic acid of Frankland and Duppa is thereby demonstrated, this acid having been found to melt at 62° (F. and D.) ; whilst Angelic acid, which also forms acetic and propionic acids by fusion with potash, melts at 45°. When Cevadine is heated to 100° with excess of benzoic anhydride, it forms a benzoylated derivative, Benzoyl Cevadine, in virtue of the reaction Cz2HygNOy + (C;H;0)20 = C;H;O2 + C32Hys(C;H;0)NOg. It results from these experiments that the following “ structural ”’ for- mulz may be assigned, since Methylcrotonic acid is indicated by C,H, = C(CH;) - CO.OH :— ON THE CHEMISTRY OF SOME OF THE LESSER-KNOWN ALKALOIDS. 107 : — OH Cevadime, (CarHNOc) __ 9 ¢0.C(CH,)=C.H, — OH. = Co,H4,NO;) Lites O.C;H,O Benzoyl Cevadine, (C2,H,,NO,¢) . 06 OCH) =0,8 é . ats 4 —O.C-H,0O. =(Co7HiiNOc) _ 06:0. Covine, (CoH y:NOz) — Orr Veratrine, (C2,H,,NO,).0.CO.C,H3(0.CH3),. Verine, (CogsH,,NO,).OH. A large proportion of the alkaloidal mixture obtained from V. Saba- dilla seeds, even with most careful working, so as to avoid as much as possible alteration of alkaloids during extraction, refuses to crystallise either as free base or as a salt. This has been considered by Weigelin and by Schmidt and Koppen to indicate the existence of an isomeric amor- phous modification of Cevadine (the Veratrine of Merck) ; another modi- fication being also considered to exist, soluble in water, and obtainable from this amorphous mixture by treatment with water. We find, however, that the amorphous mass is simply a mixture of Cevadine and Veratrine, the one base preventing the other from crystallising in the free state, and the other preventing the sulphate, or other salt of the first, from crystal- lising readily, and the crystallisability being further hindered by the presence of more or less Cevine, Verine, &c., formed by partial spontaneous saponification. This latter, too, is the cause of the partial solubility of the amorphous mixture in water, the cevadates and veratrates formed by the partial change being readily soluble in water. Doubtless the ‘‘ Sabatrine ”’ of Weigelir was a mixture of saponification and alteration products. Whether his Sabadilline was a definite precon- * tained principle or not we cannot say, not having been able to find it, even in the preparation sold as being the body itself. In pursuance of these results, we are investigating the alkaloids of V. album roots. These have been already shown by Pelletier and Caventou, Simon, Mitchell, and others, to contain at least two alkaloids, one being non-sternutatory, crystallisable from alcohol, and forming very sparingly soluble salts with certain mineral acids, e.g., sulphuric acid ; another being non-crystalline, but powerfully sternutatory. Since both the Ceyadine and Veratrine above described are powerfully provocative of sneezing and tickling of the throat when inhaled as dust, it would seem probable that the former alkaloid, Jervine (which has never been found in V. Sabadilla seeds), is utterly distinct in its nature from the latter one. Our experiments, at present far from complete, lead us to believe that “ Jervine ” is not a single alkaloid, but a mixture of two or more closely alike in many respects, and quite dissimilar from the sternutatory base ;. whilst the latter is a mixture of bases, of which one is, if not identical with the Veratrine above described, closely allied to it, as on saponification the mixture forms a small quantity of Veratric acid. 108 REPORT—1878. Report on the best Means for the Development of Light from Coal-Gas of different qualities, by a Committee consisting of Dr. Witt1am Warracr (Secretary), Professor Dirrmar, and Mr. Tuomas Wits, F.C.S., £..C. Part I.—Drawn up by Dr. WALLACE. Tus fact has long been recognised that the illumination afforded by the combustion of coal-gas depends, to a large extent, upon the way in which it is burned. Setting aside, for the present, all reference to the different theories of Davy, Frankland, Heumann, and others, as to the source of the illumination, whether from solid highly-heated particles of carbon or from incandescent gases, the fact is patent that a given quantity of gas may be burned under different conditions, so as to yield widely different illumi- nating effects. For example, a gas made from bituminous coal gave, when burned by Sugg’s Improved London Argand at the rate of 5 cubic feet per hour, the light of 14°81 candles. The same quantity burned by a union jet at ‘5 inch (water) pressure gave 11°46 candles ; and by a union jet at 1-5 inch pressure 3°66 candles; these quantities corresponding to 100, 77, and 25. Pattinson states that burners are in extensive use in Newcastle which, for 5 cubic feet of gas, give a light equal to only 32 candles, which gas, burned in a good Argand, gives for the same consump- tion 173 candles, and in good union or fishtail burners 124 candles. In the case of cannel-gas, the variations are not so extensive; but the following illustrates the effect of pressure alone in influencing the light obtained, the burners being of the same kind in each case, but with orifices suited to deliver 5 cubic feet of gas at the different pressures: at 4-inch pres- sure a union jet of the best construction gave a light equal to 28°47 candles, while at 15-inch pressure the light from an equally good union jet was 21°14 candles; these numbers being in the proportion of 100 to 74. In these instances the quanuties of gas were the same (5 enbic feet per hour) ; but if we take smaller quautities of gas, and calculate the results to 5 feet, the numbers obtained are still more startling. The following cases are quoted from Wallace’s paper on the “ Economic Combustion of Coal- Gas,” * all the burners used being Bray’s “ adamas-tipped ”’ union jets for cannel-gas. A No. 0 at 1}-inch pressure burned 2 cubic feet per hour, and gave a light of 3°5 candles, or for 5 cubic feet per hour, 8'8 candles; a No. 8 at l-inch pressure burned 7:1 cubic feet per hour, and gave 45:4 candles, or for 5 cubic feet, 32 candles. Between ordinary working limits of pressure and with equally good burners, we have, therefore, a given quantity of gas (5 cubic feet per hour) giving, in the one case, 32 candles, and in the other 8:8; or in the proportion of 100 to 274. ‘The loss of light here shown, amounting to 724 per cent. of the whole, is ex- ceeded when still higher pressures are used, and it is greater with common than with cannel-gas. A remarkable effect is obtained with a mixture of cannel-gas with about twice its bulk of air. At a low pressure in an Argand jet with large holes it gives a fairly luminous flame, while, ata high pressure (8 or 4 inches), although the quantity of gas consumed is three times as great, the flame is almost totally non-luminous, and has a greenish tint. The gas, used somewhat extensively in the United States, * Transactions of the Philosophical Society of Glasgow, 1873-4. Journal of Gas Lighting, 1874. ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF LIGHT FROM COAL-GAS. 10% made by saturating air with petroleum spirit, requires to be burned at a pressure not exceeding ‘1 of an inch, which can be obtained only with an- Argand with very large holes, or a batwing of peculiar construction, called the ‘‘ American Regulating Batwing.’ At ordinary pressures, such as are used for coal-gas, there is scarcely any light, and the flame keeps about a quarter of an inch or more above the burner. It is not only on the score of economy that it is desirable to burn gas in such a manner as to afford the greatest possible amount of light. The burning of a moderate sized jet of gas produces as much carbonic an- hydride as the breathing of two. grown-up men, and as, in an ordinary apartment, we have usually from three to six of these, the air becomes vitiated with remarkable rapidity. It is therefore desirable, in relation to health, to obtain the illumination we require with the least possible ex- penditure of gas. The sulphur in gas is a very serious drawback to its use. In burning it is, no doubt, converted chiefly, if not entirely, into sulphurous anhydride; but it is soon converted into sulphuric acid, which attacks with avidity all the more readily destructible articles in the apart- ment. So far back as forty years since the effects of the sulphuric acid arising from the combustion of gas upon the binding of books and many articles of furniture was noted, and recent experiments have shown that leather, paper, &c., in ill-ventilated apartments exposed to the emanations from burning gas for a series of years contain very large quantities of sul- phuricacid. One of us has had occasion recently to investigate the action of burning gas upon cotton goods stored in warehouses in London, Manches- ter,and other cities and towns, and found that, in some cases, a few months are sufficient to affect certain colours ; while within a year enough sulphuric acid is absorbed to seriously injure the strength of the fabrics. No doubt the true remedy for this evil is to ventilate the warehouses ; but it is obvious that if the gas were burned in an advantageous manner, and the quantity reduced to one-half or one-third, the damaging effects would be proportionately lessened. There are several distinct qualities of gas in use in this country. The best may be described as Scotch cannel-gas, as it is made only in Scot- land, where the illuminating power varies from 24 to 30 standard for 5 cubic feet per hour, consumed in a union or fishtail jet; the average may be fairly stated as 26 candles. In London a cannel-gas is used in small proportion, the iliuminating power of which is about 23 candles; and in Liverpool, Manchester, Carlisle, and probably some other towns, an inter- mediate gas is manufactured, the illuminating power of which is about 20 candles. The common gas in London and most other English and Irish towns has an illuminating power of 14 to 16 candles. In the present Report it is our intention to confine our investigations to two qualities of gas, .e., cannel-gas of 26 candles, and common gas of 16 candles illumi- nating power. The photometric results in each case will be calculated to these standards, although in the actual experiments the gas may have been a little higher or lower in quality. In the case of cannel-gas the standard is found by testing the gas by a union jet consuming 5 cubic feet at a pressure of ‘5 of an inch; while the common gas is tested by Sugg’s Londen Argand, consuming 5 cubic feet per hour at a pressure of about ‘05 of an inch. The best means at present known of burning each quality of gas will be pointed out, and tabulated results will be given, containing the details of the testings of the different kinds of burners under varying conditions of pressure. 110 REPORT—1878. The burners at present in use may be divided into the four following classes :—Ist, Cockspur or rattail; 2nd, Union’ or fishtail ; 8rd, Bat- wing; 4th, Argand. Of each of these there are a number of modifica- tions. The cockspur or rattail burner is the ‘simplest possible form of gas jet, and it was at one time the only one used for burning gas. It may be’ made by simply drawing out a piece of glass tube and breaking off the point so as to leave an orifice, having a diameter of 1 millimetre or less; but it is usually constructed of cast iron, which is drilled out as wide as possible from the bottom, leaving only a thin shell, which is then bored with a fine drill. Two sizes of these were tested, No. 1 having an orifice of about ‘6, and No. 2 of about ‘75 millimetre. These jets are used in Glasgow for lighting common stairs, and the larger-size: were ‘formerly employed for street lamps, but are now discarded in favour of union jets. The following are the results with 26-candle gas :— A ta Eas Iluminating Burner |Pressure in ue ngt “ pf h Gas Pi Pipe ane Power of 5 cubic No. inches ate y hee rt ry St dard Gon 11 feet per hour, inches ee Standa ‘andles Candles 1 5 Dine | “45 89 9°9 i 1 3k 60 1:69 14-1 1 15 43 “90 2°40 13°3 2 D Tr 80 2-49 T5671 2 1 5f 1:13 3°55 16:7 2 15 34 1:45 4:53 15°6 These figures show that even with the larger jet no more than 60 per cent. of the real value of ‘the gas can be obtained: Various modified forms of the jet were tried, some having “adamas”’ tips, and contracted’ at the bottom or otherwise obstructed, so as to diminish the pressure atthe point of ignition, but they did not show any marked superiority over those referred to above. ’ When two rat-tails are held at a right angle to one another, the lights ‘coalesce and form a flat sheet of flame. When this discovery was first made, two burners were fitted up in this way; but soon a single burner was contrived which combined the two, and hence was called a “‘ union” jet: it is also known as a fishtail, from the resemblance of the flame to the tail of a fish. It is a short cylindrical tube with a flat top in which the two orifices are drilled at about 90° to one another, and meeting in the centre. The union jet is much improved by substituting for the metal top porcelain or stoneware, the principal advantage gained being that the orifices remain clean and constant in size, while those of iron gradually rust up and require to be frequently cleaned in order to give a satisfactory light, and are consequently enlarged. Some fishtail burners are made entirely of a kind of stoneware or of steatite, but these are troublesome to remove when they get broken. The best form of burner is that with a brass body and porcelain top. Such burners are made by Leoni of London, Bray of Leeds, and other makers; but usually with some means of reducing the pressure. The fishtail burner is not suited for burning at a high pressure, under which the two flames refuse to spread out into a flat sheet but form an irregular flame, at the same time emitting a most disagreeable hissing or blazing sound. This effect ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF LIGHT FROM COAL-GAS. 111 may also result from other causes—such as a sharp bend in the gas supply tube, a speck of dust in one of the orifices of the burner, or, in fact, any- thing that disturbs the even and quiet flow of the gas. One singular example of this is the following :—If a union jet is burning 5 cubic feet of gas at ‘5 inch pressure, and a portion of the gas is led away by means of a tube inserted a few inches below the flame, the flame, although diminished in volume, immediately begins to blow. In testing flat flames the custom has invariably been to present the flat side to the disc of the photometer; but although the results so ob- tained are satisfactory in comparing one flat flame with another, they cannot fairly be compared with rattail or Argand flames, which give an equal light all round. The edge of a flat flame gives considerably less light than the side, but the difference between the two depends very much upon the richness of the gas, or, in other words, the opacity of the flame. A flame of gas of low quality is so transparent that an ordinary news- paper can be read through it; but this cannot be done with a flame of eannel gas except at the lower portion, which in any case offers scarcely any obstruction to the passage of light. The following example may be ’ given:—A union jet consuming 5 cubic feet of cannel-gas at ‘5 inch pressure gave a light of 27 candles when tested in the ordinary manner with the flat side towards the photometer disc, but the edge gave only 23 candles, and when rotated so as to give the flame in every position the average result was, as nearly as possible, 26 candles, showing that the -ordinary test gave one candle too much, or nearly 4 per cent. In the case of paraffin flat-ftame lamps, the difference between the front of the flame and the average all round varies from 4: to 10 percent. In the latter case the flame is intensely opaque and of a deep yellow colour. All the figures given in this report refer to the flat side of the flame; and this must be ‘borne in mind in comparing flat with round flames. The following table gives the results obtained with Bray’s union jets without obstruction to retard the flow of the gas and reduce its pressure ; gas by ordinary test 26 candles :— At °5 inch Pressure At 1 inch Pressure At 1:5 inch Pressure : I. P. per || Gas 4 Five || Gas | Ilumin- | Five Gas : Iluminat-| 5 cubic per Ue cubic || per | ating |eubic per hour)|ing Power) © s.6¢ |] hour |S Power | geet | hour} Power | feet OQ} (1:5 1:96 8°52 1°55 2°35 76 18 “2°45 6.8 1 1°45 TE 13:00 2°15 5:28 12°28 || 2°85 5:47 9°6 2 17 4°85 14:27 2-5 6°74 13°48 || 3-1 7-62 12°3 3 2°35 8-98 19-10 3-4 11:73 17°25 || 4:3 13°67 159 4 2°85 11.97 21:00 4-05 15-44 19°06 |} 5:0 16°62 16°62 5 3°25 13°84 21°30 4:5 18°78 20°87 || 5°55} 21:90 19°73 6{ 41 19°6 23-90 sie 25°60 22°46 Gas blows 4\ 475 24-76 26:00 Gas blows Do. 8) 5 26 26:00 Do. Do. This tavle gives instructive information as to the effects of mass or quantity of gas, and of pressure. As regards mass, we see that at the same pressure the light afforded by 5 cubic feet of gas per hour varies from 84 to 26 candles, according to the quantity burned; the lowest 112 REPORT—1878. result being obtained with about 1 cubic foot per hour, and the highest with 5 cubic feet. This last result, 7.e., 26 candles for 5 cubic feet of gas per hour, burned in a union jet at ‘5 inch pressure, is taken as the standard of comparison in all the experiments in cannel-gas. The ratio of illuminating power to quantity is nearly the same at higher pressures, and there is no difficulty in deducing the general law that the value in illuminating effect per cubic foot of gas increases with the mass of the flame. e The effects of pressure are not less striking, and might have been more so had the gas been tested at lower pressures than ‘5 inch and higher than 15 inch. The results obtained with a jet consuming 5 cubic feet per hour gave 26 candles at the low pressure and only 16°6 at 1°5 inch, showing a loss‘of lighting power amounting to about 36 per cent. ; 3 feet per hour, calculated to 5 feet, gave at the low pressure 21 candles, at the high pressure 12:3 candles; the burner being a No. 4 in the one case and a No. 2 in the other. The medium pressure gave results intermediate between these. At the higher pressures some of the larger-sized burners became useless, as already explained. As in practice it is found impossible to distribute gas at a pressure of ° less than 12 or 15 tenths of an inch of water, various contrivances for breaking the force of the gas have been invented. Among union jets of this kind, the simplest, perhaps, is that of Leoni, consisting of a brass and an iron tube which fit into one another, and between which a thin film of cotton wool is placed. This is a very good burner, but it cannot be depended upon for delivering exact quantities of gas. Bray has con- structed a very good burner similar to those already mentioned, but having a double ply of cotton cloth stretched across a metal ring placed in the tube, in order to reduce the pressure. The same manufacturer has more recently invented another burner in which the reduction of pressure is attained by passing the gas through an orifice in a porcelain plate cemented into the lower part of the burner. He calls these special burners, and they are of two kinds—one intended for general use and the other for street lamps, in which the orifices are somewhat smaller, and in which, consequently, the pressure is further reduced. Morley’s patent burner is of brass and vase-shaped, with a porcelain top, and at the bottom one or two small orifices in the metal for admitting the gas. Williamson’s jet is similar in principle, but more complicated in construction. Da Costa’s burner consists of a hollow vase stuffed with iron turnings, into which an ordinary iron union jet is screwed. There are others, but alk have the same object in view; and the simpler and cheaper burners, such as Bray’s, accomplish it as successfully as those of more complicated con- struction, and these have, therefore, been selected for a series of com- parative trials, all being made with 26 candle gas. Some of the burners referred to are called regulators, but this is a mere name, for it is obvious that they merely obstruct the flow of the gas, the quantity delivered rising as the pressure is increased. In Bray’s special burners the two holes. forming the “union” jet are placed at an angle of about 120°. ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF LIGHT FROM COAL-GAS. 113 Bray’s ‘‘ Recutator’”? Union Gas Jets ror CANNEL-GAS. | At ‘5 inch pressure Atlinch presswe | At 1°65 inch pressure a onl bast x | fas] + Bee ea | See aes he | 2. | Pee Siae. | & 2.8 a ao eat eo ak Spee | ase s | ee oe, |eee |S | BE) | Bae Ber | abe" lear Bet eS | Be! BE om = FAS Oo | A Fie o A AA 0; 1 2°72 13°6 15 3:13 10:4 2 3:21 8 1) 115] 3°75 16:3 1:8 4:3 11:9 2:45 44 9 2) 1:5 5°63 18:7 2°3 7:25 15:8 3 76 126 3] 1:8 7:97 22°1 2°75 | 10:11 18-4 3°55 | 11:37 16 4/24 | 11:26 23:4 36 | 15:21 21°1 4:3 15:32 178 5| 2:6 | 12°76 24:5 4:35 | 20-4 23:4 51 22:19 21:7 6) 3:15 | 15-95 25°3 4:95 | 25-42 25:7 58 27°51 23°8 7|3°8 | 20:07 26-4 6:05 | 32°75 27-1 Gasblows 8| 4:7 | 24:76 26°3 71 | 40°63 28'6 Do. In both series of the special burners, in which the pressure is much reduced, the best results are obtained at 1 inch pressure, while at °5 inch the flames are sluggish, and in some cases show a tendency to smoke. Mr. Holdsworth, of Bradford, has introduced a simple arrangement which he calls a gas feeder, which has been adopted rather extensively in the manufacturing towns of Yorkshire. Itis simply a little wedge-shaped piece of lead pierced in the centre with a hole the area of which is less than that of the holes in the burner, and this is fixed in the gaspipe several inches from the burner. Several sizes are made to suit varying circumstances of local pressure, as well as different sizes of burners, and, if fitted up by an intelligent workman, they accomplish the end in view very successfully. Bray’s “Spreran’’? Union Jets ror GrneraL Use. At °5 inch pressure At linch pressure | At 1-5 inch pressure H 4 La || aE sla tl ee ese |= i a Ip ae) Ga Be ao bea Zac) a es | $28 Se feslsse| 8 | 85 |S5e/ 8 | SE | Be 2 | 25 | EES | o Ba | & FS || a aa | BES i SC ss = = = = fo 0} 1-44 5°51) 19-13 2:16 9:22 21:34 || 2°59 | 10-80 20°85 1} 1°55 G1l| 19:71 || 2°36 | 10:33 21°88 || 2:87 | 12-00 20-91 2| 1:86 7:50 | 20:16 2:76 | 12°38 22:45 || 3:36 | 14:51 21:59 8/210 | 890! 21-19 | 8:10 | 14-27 22-01 | 3°74 | 17-29 | 28-11 4] 2:44 | 10:94} 22-42 3°62 | 17-69 24:43 | 441 | 20°83 23°60 8| 2°71 | 13°39] 24:70 || 4:13 | 21-13 25:58 || 5:16 | 26:17 25°36 6) 3:12 | 15:42} 24-71 4:76 | 24-40 25°63 || 5:71 | 28°66 25:09 7| 363 | 18:43) 25:39 551 | 28°65 26:00 || 670 | 34:33 25°62 8} 4:28 | 22-26} 26:00 || 639 | 34:3 26°89 || 7:92 | 40:67 25°67 114 REPORT—1878. Bray’s ‘‘Sprcran’’? Uxion Jets rox Srreer Lames. At *5 inch pressure At 1 inch pressure | At 1-5 inch pressure Biles faer | Ss) aie | ee | cee | eee 3 ae AS 5:8 3 eae aS HS 3 AE Hae BER | 2s a | Se 252 | 3. Ema) Bee 6 |R | Aa NS A ee ee ree 0} 1:30 4:85) 18°65 1:96 8:22 20:97 |) 2:3 9°70 20:73 1/ 1-46 6:04] 20°68 || 2-21 9°57 21°65 |! 2-63 | 11:45 21:77 2| 1:73 7-28] 21:04 || 2°56 | 12 23°44 || SOL | 14:86 24:68 3| 2-07 9°36] 22°61 3 14-64 24:40 || 3:57 | 17°63 24:69 4) 2-24 | 10:73} 23:95 || 3:33 | 16:57 24°88 || 405 | 20:39 25°17 5| 2°68 | 13:15| 2453 || 4:08 | 21:17 25°94 || 4:85 | 26°67 26°46 6) 2:97 | 1477] 24:86 || 4:45 | 23°73 26:66 || 5°37 | 28:87 26:88 7| 3:44 | 17:37} 25:25 || 531 | 28:26 26°61 || G43 | 34:52 26-69 8| 884 | 19°21} 25°01 || 592 | 31:22 26°37 || 7:23 | 37:32 | 25°81 Many years ago Mr. Scholl, of London, adopted the system of placing a small plate of platinum between the two orifices of the union jet, the result being that the initial velocity with which the gas escapes is spent by striking against this plate, and the gas ascends in a somewhat sluggish flame, which, in’the case of cannel-gas, has a tendency to smoke, and is easily blown about by currents of air. This is the case also with all union jet flames burned at very low pressures, and practically a jet of this kind cannot be burned much below 3 or 4 tenths for small sizes and 5 tenths: for large sizes consuming 4 or 5 cubic feet per hour. Scholl’s “ perfecter,”’ as he has called it, has been used extensively in London and other towns for common gas, but it is not suitable for the richer gas used in Scottish towns. A flame formed by a jet of gas issuing with considerable velocity possesses a certain degree of stiffness, and resists, to some extent, the influence of currents of air. This is particularly necessary in the case of cannel-gas, since, whenever the flame is much deflected by air currents, a portion of the carbon arising from the heating of the richer hydrocarbons (e.g., olifines, benzole, &c.) passes off unconsumed, and a smoky flame is the result. In practice it is necessary to sacrifice a certain proportion of the possible illuminating value in order to give the flame sufficient stiff- ness to resist currents of air. Next to the union jet, the ‘ batwing”’ is that most commonly used for burning gas. It is simply a little tube closed at one end in which a straight slit is cut, varying in breadth from about two-tenths to one millimetre. It is made of cast iron, brass, porcelain, or steatite ; the best form being that having a brass body and steatite top. The flame of the batwing is wider and shorter than that of the union jet, and in order to be equally effective requires to be burned at lower pressures. It is particularly adapted for large flames burning from 33 to 5 cubic feet of gas per hour. With rich cannei-gas (25 to 30 candles) it gives results at least equal to the union jet, and with gas of 18 to 22 candles it is decidedly superior. ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF LIGHT FROM COAL-GAS. 115 The following table gives the results of tests of a series of steatite batwing burners manufactured in Germany—gas 26 candles :— At ‘5 inch pressure At 1 inch pressure At 1‘5 inch pressure ei/o/lA |Aae | o| & Be? ioe i ia Aa © 2 | 11 | 4:24) 19:27 || 2:35) 9:05 19:25 || 315 | 11:56 | 18:35 3 | 1:45) 5°68} 19:58 | 2-65} 10:02 18:90 || 3:55 | 13:2 18-59 4 |19 | 876/ 23:05 | 31 | 12°71 20°50 |) 4 15-41 | 19:26 5 | 34 | 16-18} 23:80 || 5:2 | 24:07 23:14 Gas blows 6 | 4:05} 19:09} 23-57 Gas blows Gas blows The considerable loss of light experienced when gas is consumed in batwing burnérs at any but comparatively low pressures has given rise to many efforts to combine with the jet an apparatus to reduce the pres- sure of the gas before it issues from the narrow slit. Various burners haying obstructions have been constructed, of which Bronner’s is one of the best known. It consists of a somewhat pear-shaped brass body, with a steatite top similar to those of which the results are given above, and at the bottom a small piece of steatite in which is an oblong slit. There are, for cannel-gas, six sizes of. bodies, the sizes depending upon the area of the slits ; and five sizes of tops, and as these screw into one another,. there are thirty possible combinations. In none of these combinations, does the pressure of the gas at the point of ignition exceed °5 of an inch with an initial pressure of 1°5 inch, while in some it is only ‘2, and in some it is so low that the flame smokes and is useless. The rate of combustion is dependent on these conditions—Ist, the area of the opening at the bottom; 2nd, the area of the slit of the burner; and 3rd, the initial pressure of the gas. The range of combinations enables one to select a burner to suit almost any description of gas or any standard of pressure. The accompanying table gives the results of tests at 1 inch and 1:5 inch, with 26 candles; the burners are not adapted for lower pressures than 1 inch. For common gas (i.e., of 14 to 16 candles) a different series of tops is provided, in which the areas are considerably greater than in those made for cannel-gas, and in which the pressure is reduced to from ‘1 to. ‘3 of an inch. These burners cannot be used with cannel-gas, although with common gas they are exceedingly effective and are much in use, especially in London :— 12 316 REPORT—1878. a i et PE eee At 1 inch pressure At 15 inch pressure 5 a0) apie 2 &p op19 q = PH a axe E = Pw =| a Aur oa) Teale 26 |-a82 | x 8 (go eee ies 8 |3|8e| He | ees | S| s |B) Fe | Bee em ake = pay? tee A Ae el = Aa ° 2 2) 12 5:07 | 24:13 2 2 14 525 | 18:75 2 3 | 14 664 | 23°71 2 3 195 | 7:37 | 18:90 2 4 Smokes 2 4 2:3 10°33 | 22:46 2 5 Smokes 2 5 2-4 11:24 | 23:42 2 6 Smokes 2 6 Smokes 2.) 2 | 14 5:53 | 19:75 24 2 1:9 8:3 21:84 2B RB daw 848 | 24:94 24 3 23 | 10:14 | 22:04 21 | 4 | 2:03) 10°33 | 25°49 24 4 27 | 12:08 | 22:37 25 | 5 Smokes 24 5 2:85 | 14:29 | 25:07 1.92 1 6 Smokes 24 6 3 15:21 25°35 3 2 | 1:46 6°27 | 21:62 3 2 2 8:48 | 21-20 3 3 | 190] 866 | 22-79 3 3 2:4 11:34 | 23°68 3 4 | 213} 11:24 | 26:39 3 4 28 | 14:84 | 26:50 3 5 Smokes 5 5 3:15 | 17:04 | 27:20 3 6 |. Smokes 3 6 3:25 | 18:07 27°80 8h.) 2 1 15 5°81 19:3 34 2 212) 885 | 20°87 84 | 3 | 195) 88 21:28 33 3 2°55 | 12°63 | 24:76 84 | 4 | 2°55 | 12:08 | 23°68 3s 4 3 14:47 | 26:12 34 5 | 2:8 14:38 | 2568 ||- 3} 5 35 18:07 | 2581 3h | 6 | 3 15°58 | 25:97 34 6 36 | 19:45 | 27:01 4 2) 16 6:36 | 19°87 ete « 2 2°3 977 | 21:24 4 3} 21 10°69 | 25:45 4 3 29 | 13:83 | 23:84 4 4 | 2:65 | 13:37 | 25°23 4 4 3:3 17:06 | 25:85 4 5 | 345] 17-61 | 25:52 4 5 41 21:57 | 26:30 4 6 | 3:55 | 18:07 | 25:45 4 6 4:2 | 22:40 | 26:66 5 >a i (f/ i ny cs = We 0219) 5 2 26 968 | 18:81 5 Bol 28) || Lee 25°87 5 3 3:3 13:64 | 20°67 5 4 |] 33 | 154 23°33 5 4 4 19:91 24-14 5 5 | 41 | 20°74 | 25:29 5 5 5 25:36 | 25:36 5 6 | 43 | 22°68 | 26:3 5 6 53 | 27°66 | 26:10 This table shows that it is easy, with properly adjusted batwing burners, to obtain, with a consumption of from 3 to 5 cubic feet per hour, at least the full effect of illumination exhibited in the standard mode of testing already referred to; and that even with a consumption of 2 cubic feet a very favourable result may be obtained. In no case is the loss of light with batwing burners so great as with badly arranged union jets. ; Many other descriptions of improved batwings have been constructed, some of which have been tested. The “Clege’’ batwing, manufactured by Sugg, has a steatite top and a conical brass body closed at the bottom, and with a slit cut in it with a fine saw. The respective sizes of the slits above and below determine the consumption of gas and the pressure at the point of ignition. Jn Silber’s batwing, made by the Silber Light Company, one burner is placed above another, both being of steatite, the slit cf the lower one being much smaller than that of the upper, and con- ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF LIGHT FROM COAL-GAS. 117 nected by a vase of brass. Only the three smallest sizes of these are suitable for rich cannel-gas, the larger ones being intended for gas of lower quality. The following are the results obtained with 26 candle gas :— Cieca AND SILBER Batwinas. At ‘5 inch pressure || At 1 inch pressure || At 1°5 inch pressure | eo N19 © | a0 a1 | &0 B19 26|.48 logs |Get || 45 Sea llearouleed wales ana Balde (SSS (88) ay |Sse(eai\as lees og|5F | S20) (3/82 |-35.9)28)-22 |258 oh mn to] n ge) 2" | Beelss| 26/223 | ee Em | BES fA AR aaa ae | A AA Clegg, No. 2 . | 2 9-15] 22-87 || 3-4 |[14-77| 21-72 |] 4-45 |18:3 | 20-56 at ta Da aioe|ls 22-41 |] 4:45 | 21-11) 23-72 || 5-7 | 27-04) 23°72 » 9 4. |42 |20:37) 24:25 || 6-45 | 31-2 | 24:19 Blows ” » 0. |48 | 23:92) 24:99 Blows Blows Silber, A. | 95 | 3:07] 1616 |[15 | 6-81] 21-03 |} 1:9 | 10-03} 26-4 cite . | 1:55 | 7-34] 23-68 |] 2:35 | 12-07| 25°68 || 3 15:04} 25:07 ee O . | 22 (11-94) 25:54 |] 3:3 | 17-27) 2617 || 4:25 | 23-12) 27-2 Several varieties of regulating batwings have been invented by Sugg, Witthoft, Winsor, and others; the principle of their construction being to check the flow of gas by means of a plug regulated by a screw. At a given pressure in the pipes the burners may be regulated to deliver any _ desired quantity of gas; and in the experiments on the Winsor and Sugg burners quoted below, they were regulated so as to burn the number of cubic feet per hour corresponding with the numbers marked on the burners. Gas used = 26 candles :— Suge’s “ Winsor” Batwing Suge’s “ Regulating ” Batwing | Wamin_ | Luminat- .__| Illuminat- Il -|. ll =|; No. ra per sein ing Power|| yo. Gas per sone: ing Power our | power [Perd cubic hour | power | Pe 5 cubic feet feet 2 2 9°6 24 2 2 9:2 23 3 3 15 25 3 3 15°34 25°56 4 4 19°87 24-84 4 4 19:9 24:88 5 5 25:2 25:2 5 5 24-75 24-75 6 6 28:74 23°95 If two batwing flames are brought together, especially if the slits be narrow, the gas of low quality, and the pressure somewhat high, the illuminating power of the united flame is greatly in excess of the sum of the two tested separately. Upon this principle is constructed a double- slit batwing, the slits being about 1 millimetre apart, which is used in 118 REPORT—1878. Manchester and other towns in England, and which is an excellent burner for gas not exceeding 20 candle power, but gives a somewhat smoky flame with gas of high quality. The only other batwing that requires further to be noticed is the patent regulating batwing used in the United States of America, where it was introduced in 1871, and which is practically the only flat flame burner capable of burning advantageously the ‘‘air-gas”’ made by saturat- ing air with the vapour of petroleum spirit. It consists of a very much elongated iron batwing with an exceedingly narrow slit, surrounded by a brass tube at the distance of about 2 millimetres; into the space between the two, gas is admitted by a wide orifice (the amount being regulated by a screw), and this gas ascends entirely without pressure, while the force of the gas issuing from the narrow slit spreads it out into a fine soft flame. ‘This burner gives excellent results with gas of all qualities, but its shape is not adapted to the gas fittings in use in this country, and it has not been used here except for air-gas made for private houses. Argand burners are exclusively used in the photometric testing of common gas, and they are also employed rather extensively for lighting shops and public buildings, but to a limited extent for private houses. They give a higher photometric effect with common gas than any flat- flame burner known; and even with cannel-gas, the best descriptions, especially those of Sugg and Silber, give results which approach very near to those obtained when the gas is tested at a comparatively low pressure by large-sized fishtail or batwing burners. The original form of Argand was a brass double cylinder with, above, an iron ring perforated with small holes, and below, a “ crutch ”’ or forked tube, by which the gas was introduced at opposite sides. A wide and ‘short glass chimney was used, but this was afterwards modified in a variety of ways with a view to making the current of air impinge more directly upon the flame and so increase the intensity of combustion. The holes being small, the gas escaped at a comparatively high pressure ; and the character of the flame both as to volume, shape, and luminosity, depended partly upon the initial velocity with which the gas escaped from the burner, and partly upon the shape and dimensions of the funnel. The enlargement of the holes enabling the gas to escape at a moderate pressure was proposed by the late Dr. Letheby, who was afterwards associated with Mr. Sugg, by whom many improvements in Argand burners have been introduced. The Letheby burner raised the apparent quality of London gas from 12 to 14 candles, and a further increase of 2 candles was obtained by Sugg’s London Argand now generally accepted as the standard burner for testing gas made from common coal. In this burner the principle is recognised of permitting the gas to escape practically without pressure, the shape and volume of the flame being determined by the narrow funnel and a ‘“‘ cone”’ of thin metal which serves to throw the current of air into close contact with the outside of the flame. The upper portion of the burner is of steatite, and instead of the ordinary “ crutch’”’ below, the gas is introduced by three very narrow tubes. A number of sizes of this burner are made of which details are given below, but the following are the various dimensions of the standard burner used in photometry :— Diameter of steatite top, external, ‘84 inch ; internal, ‘47 inch ; number of holes, 24; diameter of holes ‘04 inch, chimney 6 x 1? inches, for gas of 14 candles, and 6 x 2 for gas of 16 candles. The narrow funnel and the cone restrict the quantity of air to very little more than is required to ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF LIGHT FROM COAL-GAS. 119 burn the gas, thus avoiding the diminution of light which results from a too rapid combustion of the gas, and the cooling effect of a large quantity of air. The pressure of the gas inside the steatite top is considerably less than ‘1 of an inch, and that required to pass 5 feet per hour through the complete burner is about ‘2 of an inch. In the burner introduced by Mr. A. M. Silber, the steatite top with wide holes (about 1 millimetre or ‘04 inch) is also adopted, but the body of the burner is considerably prolonged, and the so-called “cone” is long and cylindrical with a curved top. A very essential feature in the Silber Argand is an air tube introduced into the centre of the jet, which is said to carry a portion of the air to the upper part of the flame, and which certainly has a remarkable effect in steadying it. The funnel is 7 or 8 x 17 inches, and in consequence of the form of the “ cone” is kept so cool at the bottom that it may be handled without difficulty while the flame is burning. Funnels of 10 inches high are also used, but while the con- sumption of gas is thereby increased, the illuminating power per cubic foot of gas remains almost quite constant. Mr. Silber has recently dis- covered the remarkable fact that a globe or vase placed below his Argand increases the illuminating power considerably ; and his statement has been verified both as to common and cannel gas, the increase with the former being about a candle, and with the latter about 14 candle. The effect of placing a vase below an ordinary union jet was also tried, but no increase of light was obtained, while the flame showed a distinct tendency to “blow.” That the flame of the Argand should have its illuminating power increased 6 per cent. by passing the gas through a glass vase (or cylindrical metal box, which answers the purpose equally well) is a phe- nomenon which appears to be at present incapable of explanation. The following table gives the results. of photometric tests of various Argand burners with cannel-gas of 26 candles laminating power. From 3 to 4 cubic feet of gas per hour was burned in each case, and the result calculated to the usual standard of 5 feet per hour:—. Size ofa) Cees Funnel ee Power German porcelain Argand, with cone (40 small holes) 8 x 13 17:80 Leoni 40-hole burner, “ adamas” top, with cone ............ 7x 1z 18:18 Sugg-Letheby, 15 holes, in steatite ring, perforated gallery | 7 x 2 18°86 American regulating Argand, brass, 40 very large holes... | 5 x 2 21:08 Suge’s London Argand, 24 holes, with cone and regulator | 7 x 12 22-40 Silber 40-hole burner, steatite top, cone, and centre tube... | 8 x 12 22°54 Do. 32 do. do. do. do. 33 Do. 23:08 Do. 24 do. do. do. do? ease Do. 24:04 Do. do. do. with glass vase below ..........e0eeee0+ Do. 25°61 The following tests were made with various Argands in order to test the effect produced by the cone and by the centre tube of the Silber burner :— 120 REPORT—1878. Pressure | Gas per | Ilumi- ae atinlet of| hour, | nating a Burner (cubic feet} Power ey ease 5 cubic ft. Suge’s London Argand, 24 holes ......... Winch| 3:3 15:0 22:73 Do. do, without cone......... 26 11:8 22:7 Do. do. older pattern, 36 holes} +17 inch| 4:0 1675 | 20-94 Do. do. without cone ......... 4:0 17:0 21:25 Silber’s 24-hole burner, complete ......... ‘05 inch | 4:0 19-2 24-00 Do. do. without cone, but | with air tube ...... 4-15 19:0 22:89 Do. do. without air tube, but with cone ......... 38 17-2 22°63 Do. do. without cone or air PDO caaweecestios. 4 131 19:26 These tests show that the cone, by increasing the draught, enables a larger quantity of gas to be burned, an effect which could be obtained equally well by increasing the height of the chimney ; and the air tube of the Silber burner also produces a similar effect, increasing at the same time the heat and illuminating power of the flame and its stability. Indeed, the Silber burner without cone and centre tube, and especially when the latter is removed, gives so unsteady a flame that it is practically useless for illumination, while, in its complete condition, it gives the steadiest flame of any Argand yet constructed. A series of experiments were made in order to ascertain the relative dimensions of the inlet and outlet of various burners. The upper steatite portion of each burner was removed and fitted up in a little bit of appa- ratus extemporised for the purpose, so that gas could be passed through the holes, while the bottom portions were simply screwed on in the usual manner, and the gas allowed to escape without lighting it. In all the trials the pressure of the gas was maintained steadily at *2 of an inch of water. The numbers represent cubic feet of gas per hour :— | Bottom | Top Complete | Sugg-Letheby 15-hole burner .............s0ceeeeeeee 16:7 28°7 146 Sugg 24-hole standard London Argand ............ 4:9 28:8 4:5 Do. 86-hole older pattern SpuNnaLOIGO ON RONOS 6-1 29-1 6:0 et Bere sealed ce ssdapencet snc saess cto nase reens tac WT, 29-5 17 MDG eS ate nthe peels ss See's sin hase er cee eee ainn 19-1 288 18°7 These results show that the pressure of the gas is checked much more efficiently at the bottom of the burner by Suge’s arrangement than by that of Silber, and in’ fact the latter has usually attached to it a small regulator adjustable by a screw, without which, and when regulated only by a stopcock, a disagreeable hissing noise is produced by the passage of the gas through the almost closed stopcock. The ‘‘ Bec a Bengel,’’ or Bengel Argand burner, used for gas testing in Paris, has a porcelain top, with 30 rather small holes, a brass cone, and at ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF LIGHT FROM COAL-GAS. 121 the bottom what is called a “ panier,”’ constructed of porcelain, and pierced with numerous holes for the admission of air. The funnel is 8 x 13 inches. With 26 candle gas it burned 2°5 cubic feet, and gave a light of 10°8 candles, or for 5 feet per hour 21°6 candles. Suge has constructed a series of “ London Argands,” burning from 3 to 12 cubic feet per hour of common gas, and from 14 to 74 cubic feet of cannel-gas per hour. Those from A to I resemble in every respect the standard London burner already described; K has, in addition, a single or rat-tail jet in the centre, and that marked double is formed of twa concentric Argands. They gave the fellowing results :— | TIluminat- Baner| No.of F 1 | Height of | Gas per Tlluminat- | ing Power a. holes a flame hour ing Power | per 5 cubic feet A 15 6 x 18 | 22 inches 85 7:67 20°78 B 18 Wa. lt |W28e' ,» 2-65 11-90 22-45 OC 21 Re ae 2:85 12°63 22-16 D 24 CLS Sale Ss in 55, 3°25 13-74 21:14 E 27 Do. On oh wa 34 14:67 21:57 F 30 Dee (Sia 3°72 15:97 21-48 G 33 8x18 | 33 7 45 19-13 21-25 H BPO hah igre” 5:05 21:17 20-96 I 40 Do Ate EE 53 22-3 21-04 | K 42 Do. 4. ,, 64 28°4 21°84 Bpable|| 54-21. | 10x 2 |e. | 7-8 36-4 23:33 | It is only right to state that all these burners are constructed to burn common rather than cannel gas. oO Oo a eS) 3 eS | 2S gp & Fe 2:3 as ES je) A| so = Ordinary plate glass*; two plates... { 2H [198 javerage] DeEesvere j 195 &“4) | 904; plate The same glass toughened ; two plates { A [185 (average] glass, 1876 Calton Hill trap, red, close grained ... | 280 | 14 23 | (620? 1874) - 9 red, open grained ... 295 1-0 1-0 = x 5 grey, weathered ...... 360 O-4 1:0 = Sicilian white marble. ............cse..000+ 508 Sh = 542 Kenton sandstone ..... S68 sossopedaessosascos 606 | 38 6-1 a avees 5-7 p. c.) Heworth RUMMY ledacnis cnchennaniewonss sav done 641 2:9 4:5 == Prudham “fh. baceBeoccdonapadeseeceeeee 714 59 75 — Galashiels (red) sandstone ............+.. 741 6°6 8-4 = One hahaa 5 aoe 6-5 a 3 4 (Thermometer ey bed {n, “ace fe | ne y att = EES beds | 61 ab 9 * bog bottom bea fB: -| 838 | 2 ee ral ‘a9 "elses hn 2 yea emia 61 — Sei hai cm are aie MLA i 843 2-7 5-9 = BedimOcken s .sesedscneateestheecteoncs 749 3:0 58 — Opaque white quartz (Morthoe, N. TDYES (O99 |p oreignns scocacerr oo s-e anos see Oo C Boe 862 — 5) | we BIGS 76) the whole (instead of half) of the correction noted in the Table is sub- tracted from the specific heat there given, the result, 0°190, is less instead of greater than the known value; and no real discordance of the obser- vation from the known property of this porous stone can, therefore, be properly suspected, with a suitable allowance. The proportion of foreign mineral (which is compact quartz) contained in the specimen of galena may be calculated approximately from the specific gravity (4°90) of the specimen, which is less than the usual specific gravity (7°59) of galena; and the resulting specific heat of the galena alone, which appears to occupy in reality scarcely a half (47 per cent.) of the volume of the thick plate used in the experiments, agrees very fairly with this material substitution, with the specific heat by weight of pure galena given by Regnault. * The plates of toughened and untoughened glass were obtained from makers in Berlin. Their average conductivities are respectively ‘00185 and -00198, showing a loss of 3, or of 64 per cent. in the conductivity by toughening. The property of hard-drawn metal wires is probably analogous to this, which are known to be less perfect conductors of electricity than soft annealed ones. There is a sensible and nearly proportional difference, also, in the specific heats by weight ; but none, apparently, in the specific gravities of the two plates. (See the accompanying list. of this Report.) ON THE THERMAL CONDUCTIVITIES OF CERTAIN ROCKS. 139 The specific gravity as well as the specific heat of the specimen of English alabaster proves it (as moistening it with an acid also shows) not to be “ oriental alabaster,” or calcic carbonate, but calcic sulphate, or a semi- crystalline and compact form of a hydrate of that substance which appears Specific Heat by ‘weight Description of rock, and number Substance Authority Gy of specimens tested (1878) 1878 Coke (of anthra- cite) seorecscccce Regnault 0:201 0:193 Gas-coke ad specimen). 0°287 Cannel-coal (3 specimens). COAL ceed oxasepepiae Crawford | 0°278 0-374 S Newcast le house coal (1 speci- ; lL men). Burnt Clay ...... Gladolin 0:185 0188 Brick and firebrick (4 specimens). White marble... | Regnault | 0-216 | 0210 White Sicilian and Italian mar- bles (2 specimens). Grey marble ... ” 0210 | 0-221 Other marbles (7 specimens), ont Godstone petals: a0) 0215 |4 9-980 about + pare white ¢2sPecimens chalk . {9-187 Opaque white quartz (3) white Silica (quartz) » 0191 specimens). sand Lo-195 Quartzite (2 specimens) J 0-200 Sodic chloride... ” 0-214 | 0192 Rocksalt (1 specimen). Tron pyrites ... ” 0130 | 0:126 Tron pyrites (1 specimen). [ 0-084 eae (with 28} p.c. of quartz) ; specimen. 0-046 =| J Galena (with 283 p. c. of quartz; corrected for quartz). 0:284 English alabaster (1 specimen). s P LED cc csc cceecss as 0051 Calcic Sulphate, : : . 2 Plaster of Paris (1 specimen, de- aoe 4 vigil lo e ducting half the poss. cor.) Calcic Fluoride | — — 0-200 Fluor-spar (1 specimen), to agree in the property of its specific heat sensibly with plaster of Paris, although not with anhydrous calcic sulphate, to which Regnault assigns a Substance tested, directly and indirectly, | Specific Absolute | Value of for Thermal Conductivity ; and for Heat by Conduc- the ratio Thermal Capacity by volume, and volume tivity hk by weight Cc h e Dry white sand (specific gravity, and specific heat tested directly, 1878; and thermal conductivity, directly, 1877) ... | 0-292 0:00093 | 0:00318 White sand thoroughly wet (specific gravity, and specific heat tested directly 1878 ; and thermal conductivity, directly, HGNC U)i* econ saceutUMmemenceencces tetas tcests sees 0°567 (?) 0:00726 | 0:01279 (2?) Sand of experimental garden (reduction of Professor Forbes’s Thermometer Re- cords, by Sir W. Thomson) ................6+ 0-300 0:00262 | 0:00872 much lower specific heat by weight. These properties of minerals, like their specific gravities, certainly form very valuable and easily deter- 140 REPORT—1878. mined characters capable of affording most useful assistance as permanent and special qualities for distinguishing them from one another. Another example of comparison between the direct and indirect methods of experiment has presented itself in the Committee’s observa- tions of Thermal Conductivities, where, however, they have not yet investigated the original substance which was the subject of the earlier experiments, but only an approximately similar one in two different con- ditions which permit a fair comparison of the measurements to be made, which have been obtained by direct, and also by a totally different method of procedure. The quantity of water (23 per cent.) found to be taken up by dry sand when thoroughly wet, as stated in the table, should raise its specific heat by weight from 0°200, there given, to 0:348; but the specific heat observed in the second case was only 0-284, corresponding to an absorption of only 12 per cent. of water. The specific heats by weight and by volume given in the table for thoroughly wet sand are, there- fore, too low, and the value of the ratio E deduced from them must be sensibly higher than its real value for saturated sand. For perfectly dry sand it is 0:0032, for thoroughly wet sand it must accordingly be about 0:0100, and for the sand in the experimental garden in Edinburgh, Sir W. Thomson obtained the value 0:0087, of the ratio 2 by a reduction of the records of Professor Forbes’ underground thermometers. Could a specimen of the sand itself, which the Committee hopes to procure, be obtained in which the thermometers were sunk, the value of the ratio found by Sir W. Thomson would no doubt be very closely corroborated ; and, at the same time, the real values of the absolute conductivity and specific heat of a loose and porous earth like that in which these ther- mometers were placed, which the Committee has not yet determined, would be added to the present list. The Committee has the satisfaction to notice with peculiar commenda- tion the series of excellent and accurate experiments on the thermal con- ductivities and capacities of certain specimens of rocks of Japan, which the professors of the Tokio College there, Messrs. J. Perry and W. Ayrton, have conducted with the greatest skill and originality of method and ef practical execution. Of the very excellent memoir of these experimenters, and of the contributions from other sources to the practical investigation of the subject of rock-conductivity which have been made recently and in bygone years, the Committee hope to point out the bearings in a collective review, if the production of such a historical report, during the coming year, presents itself as a sufficiently desirable object for their reappointment. Thin microscopic sections of about twenty of the rock-specimens upon which they have experimented have been prepared by Mr. G. F. Cuttell, of London, which convey much information to the eye regarding the causes of the various degrees of con- ductivity that are met with in particular rocks. The compact, almost purely siliceous nature of the quartzites is thus visibly presented, and the reason of their ranking with quartz much higher in conductivity than the more heterogeneous sandstones is very obvions. A similar minute inspection of the structure of Craigleith sandstone will no doubt furnish evidence of similar purity of its material in comparison with other sandstones, in explanation of the very distinctive quality of remarkably high thermal conductivity which it appears to possess among them. 14] ON THE THERMAL CONDUCTIVITIES OF CERTAIN ROCKS. cam oe | ee RS eae RS al alias! |, — suory 4 “BA -19sqo JO"ON (89-0) | (¢z-0) Log 8200: Lg ‘3 59.0 Tz.0 es eel 9-0) (9-0) Pa £9-0 6-0 GLE Z§00 4 { 18.0 #50 806 8#00- aa 6F-0 1G-0 = ai site Lg.0 16-0 966 ¥£00: = ( Bee ( ag P 09-0 46-0 OFS 6600- 0-9 { 60.0 1-0 == = a 03-0 61-0 661 0g00- =< Tg-0 06-0 61 6g00- = 69-0 61-0 igFT 46900: a 8h0 06:0 881 €200- == 19-0 61:0 ft at gz J | (F8:0) | (02-0) 67-0 81-0 a; a ca 67-0 6L-0 LIT 9800: oan 67-0 61-0 OIL 1600- ty 67-0 61-0 601 6600: : 87-0 61-0 S31 0800: me 9F-0 81-0 6IT 4800: ee S¥-0 81-0 Y ‘ord 0 9) 5 fede Aytaty | { 1OIIS | ouNTOA | FUSIOM sIsed -onpuon|] esqIs &q Ag -sod fo asueyy | Gem) 41g Gem) 41, aynposqy :qvoy oyloedg £8 { oe trersereeene CTTET UOITeO) pourers-ouy | = 79-6 ft Gaqexq ‘Arrenb meyyog) “ poy os va seen Crogaxny ‘Arrenb weyyog) dea, Lory —_- OG °°’ (GoouuRY yoory Fo opis yAnos) devay, ong re FL] veers Coqieg ‘(ITH Thouury) syoor-deny, = 06-6_ |" "am fsoqerd omg ! (TIES UIT AA) OMOYsUIGM | PU sUTT A 8.2 ue) » pitt reeeenneseeeeeeeseeereeBATE YSTULO) — 29-3 Fee e neta eee ee ene esteeeeensenesees aqui poz YStpoarg = 09-6 |" steeper ecs) _-*6 = (Gn reo0) — 99.4 Samet ee teres eteston oye (euy) yoouuery Yoory —_ 19-Z Meee eet ereeeesreeetsstereseses “ port peer10jeg = QO.G [trttsttrreeereceeewes . aque13 fai3 waepreqy saqtmey eT { eae “*s""""(TTBMUIOD) UBSSOH UL ‘aMOsUOIT-zIJAeNH — 63-% eee or rr Iaqstaey i GG. (aorpeyetyog Jo edos yzou) «= «— MOTTOX a 99-6 |'*"*' (uorpeqerqog fo 4ruuMns) 931z4,1enb yurg = 6:3 __ Caorrreqerqos jo odojs y10u) Aye eurrpeyssz = GS.G (moaag ‘N ‘e0q]10,,) soyizyreng) a F9G fore (Koureppry) zjrenb aqy1ym onbedo | pure zqrent ‘ord [peqztos -qe 1oyeM oe 10] 20 ures pe4se3 yooy Jo wowtoedg ae es : AYIABID oytoedg "SH00Y dO SNANWIOGAG SNOIUVA JO SHONVISISAY GNV ‘SUILIAILONGNOD ‘saILIOVAVO ‘IVNUGH], GHL JO ANV ‘SAILISOMOG ANV SGILIAVEH OldIoGdg gO wTAVy, \ REPORT—1 878. 142 ~ Ye} S Spoecs ANNN 1800. | 1 o200- | tT 9¢00- | I 7) — suor} one | eho O09 3 | TO on enter LOT 0900: ZI 2800: G9% 8g00- iat 8900: 88 €900- OLT 6900: SLT 8900. 10 8F00- 983 2400: 092 0F00: G36 F¥00- 126 G700- 91 9700: 81 9800: 6g8 6Z00- Y aoue yuan “ISIS | onpuog Gem) 41¢ aqynposq Vy oG 1 md ‘ord ‘10119 aTqrs -sod jo gsuriy taf! 69:0 12-0 = 08-6 Lg-0 06-0 = 61-6 09:0 16-0 a 08-6 Tg'0 61-0 = 89-G 69.0 61-0 = IL-3 12-0 61-0 = 01-6 09:0 61-0 = 89:6 Tg-0 61-0 a 99:3 £20 02:0 = €L 03-0 61-0 = 19:3 69-0 61-0 as OL-G (99.0) | (2-0) e.g { ($#-2) 03:0 16-0 LE-G §9-0 61:0 — tLG 99-0 61:0 sae 88-6 69-0 02-0 = LLG as =, = T¥-3 (¥9-0) | (1-0) O-1 { (89-2) 1 19-0 02-0 09-6 J (99.0) | (@z-0) OT { (¢¢.2) €9-0 16:0 09-6 ‘ord a 0 [peqios auINnjo,A | yUSIOM |-qvieyen G2A\) Ag Ag 10] el : Urey Gem) 41g : APTABID : yeoR oytoedg oytoadg steteeereeseees QBRABaTO 0} ‘died ss “" (ap ‘gq pue VW) "19 04 ‘red ‘aqv[s Sorutjse,g | pus Hee eee ween eceneeeasee aBVABITO 04 ‘red ‘ayes YSTO AA (9)'12 04 009 Fo er sue ye ‘poureis-umtpeum & “ (4) 0} .OF Jootsue ye Spourers -wantpeut oh “ see oO) "TO 04 ‘died ‘pourers-UMIpeut 6 a *(y) "19 03 “dred ‘pourers-mmitpeum &5 Ke sees ee eeeeseses (q) [Oo 0} ‘1ed ‘pourers-oug st s weet reneeee (Cy) a) (on ‘red ‘pourers-o81e090 ss ae *** (g) pourers-as1e090 i Ke (Z) pourers-umtpeu se uf vee (7) poured -oug ‘19 0} ‘red (yoouury yoy) ,ou0yssepy snvaeneevencccnsnocccsecsccansecsseneccsestas (yoouuey Yoo) parmopoo-7ysIy 5 sreeeeees (TIQOUUBY TOOT) 9UOJSSE,Y PoyVINpuUy sees (qoouuBYy Yoo) pozyemputr i see" (QqMMOOBIJ[]) PIIN}Xe4-asooT “STGOG-vorpL (ITH 07[%9) pourers-asie09 ‘dery, pereyyve sentee (IITH W09TeO) pourers-astvoo ‘dery, poy pe}se} soo JO uomtoeds soTeyg ‘ayes ~£e10 ‘o7RI1g 8901048 “se, q pue ISTYOS -BOLL YOON JO ssv[p a —————————————————— 143 ON THE THERMAL CONDUCTIVITIES OF CERTAIN ROCKS. OTTO: (10T0-) FZ10- T9T0- (O0T0-) 6IT0- 6810: GE10- 98T0- $060: 88T0- G0Z0- O9TO- 8320- $100- €900- €200- $400: #200: 6200- *qnd arem LOYy POLYM wLOIy suompoeds-9002 ayy Jo e8vavero Jo soueyd peinyzed 9} 0} yoadsar YITM ‘po}s0} soye[d-yoor oy} Jo saonf ay2 fo SUOIPOOIIP 94} OJOUNEp ‘asvAva[o 91} 07 “d2 “OF Jo opsuB UL 4e Lo ‘1efNoTpusdzed ‘("[9 0} ‘red) ,, advavaTO 94} 0} [oT[VIed ,, suoTJdrIOSep ogy, » | ¢ € T Lal a ww Nw a T T IT ) i GLI 8900: (g91) |(1900-) LL 9900: Gel $100: (g91) |(6g00-) 81 9900: OFT TL00- 9a1 $900- es1 9100: 6IT $800. 921 6100: 611 #800: 61 1900: LIT 9800: FFG 1#00- Sig Tg00- 919 g100- FL 1200: Teg $200: LLE 1200: (0-26) | (92-0) 0-68 ZF-0 _ 29.0 tcl eai0) 09-0 oat, “ae 49.0 8.01 { “a9 6-0 Tet{ “80 90.0 elt { «te 69-0 L6 { 8F.0 ger{| rp ver4 | aor {| 20) ont {| tO) (79-0) eat { ZF-0 g0rt| = 99.0 S| (49-0) Laan hi 29.0 et { 89-0 est iilmaros 6-0 02 ij it? $9.0 v8 {| 120 (3¥-0) 62-0 6L-0 02-0 (92-0) 12-0 (12-0) 12-0 (92-0) TZ-0 (F360) L 81-05 (92-0) 12-0 (3-0) 81-0 (F2-0) 61-0 (2-0) 61-0 (92-0) 61-0 (23-0) 81-0 (22-0) L1-0 1Z-0 ($2.0) 66-0 (0¢-0) 66-0 $2-0 (€-0) } 12-0 (12-0) 06-0 £-66 { $0 6-9 #8 L9 gL GF 8-9 6-9 L9 L9 6-9 9-9 0:6 8-0 GG tT { { { { { \ { { { { { \ { { { (¢8-1) 0%-T 89-2 69-2 ($¢-8) 81% (28:3) FL (98-2) 13-3 (1-3) G1% (88-2) 82-2 (08-2) 81-2 (12-3) FZ J (96-2) BOG (28-2) 61-2 (€F-2) 08-2 (68-2) 76-2 19-3 (08-2) 13% (02-2) 8L-Z 99-2 (99-2) 1S-Z (99-2) 49:6 treeeeeeeees COmOISpOH)) ! (puBsteeIs) oOyspuRg ‘* qoqurry ‘syooy Jo AoT[BA Wor, ou0jspuey treseereuserserereess (TOASTIG) OUOISPURS JURA, HO ee met ere ereeeteeee (aoaog 'N ‘toyurT ) qs prey eee eee n ee eneeeoenennne otojspues (par) STOTyseley eet wee weneeeee “ce (a]SvoOMEN) MOPS eoeeeneeceerece “ (ay4seoMoN) Wegpusg auojspues (OPJsSvOMON) WILOMO_, POSH eee twee eaters eet ereeetaeessteseee ix yooy peg ” S seceaneactneunnneneennenies 100% XAT | B sieuisblne ch peases caremel(cn) “cc “ s serena seoneneeseees (Le) “ Jo TW0zI0g a HGEGREMRETIOO OCC GO F\ “ “ : ttisereereeseeees (IT) pag ‘mouey, Jo dog, © trreeeeeeees (otros) *[o 09 ‘diad { (ormury ‘sre ysnoyoyer Ay ) sere (pareqyeam) *[o 07 ‘red areys pereity Hreeceierseocioess yes Sanseasess (QTIEHOIAGN,) iT; yovlq seetececeeeccececceseaensseess(QTagBOMON) O[eys Lo14) ee ae) 04 ‘died “ 6 “(an ‘gq pue VY) ‘12 03 ‘aed ‘(aoqgoxq “woqsy3) a4¥vIs F190 —— souojspueg 1878. REPORT 144 ! t 9TTO- 0 cOT0: I 0800- 6 6800: 6 1 8610-0 6800-0 ¢ €010-0 lp pile) cola £ 6010-0 TE i 8gT £900- 961 | TS00- oss 0700-4 Leas: | e700. { ig9T | 40900. FIZ 1¥00- 189T | 20900s JL9T | 20900 E61 500: L6I 1900: 20% 0800: 981 #900- e61 TS00: PLP 1200: Y 90uB k “ETEORT paes Gem) 41g aynposqy (1 12) 0-98 ‘ord $ 101190 9rqis -sod Jo suey (08:0) | (18:0) (91-2) 9F-0 Ae | 18 { ET (99:0) | (2-0) one { (09-2) 03-0 08-0 FFG (ZL-0) | (@8-0) etry (¥6-3) 09-0 83-0 10-2 (Z2:0) | (@8-0) S114 (¢2-2) 8F-0 #60 66-T (99-0) | (22-0) 18 { (FF-2) L¥-0 12-0 96-6 19.0 1z-0 | (¢-0) 89.2 89-0 1z-0 = OL 9-0 12-0 = 19-3 #9-0 12-0 = 09-2 99.0 12-0 = £9-% 6F-0 610 | (9-0) FOZ 99-0 12-0 = 9.3 19-0 92-0 | (9-0) OL-% 99-0 92-0 ca 89-2 66.0 02-0 4 8h 99-0 12-0 sae OL: 09-0 66:0 = c9.Z LG-0 16-0 = TL, 15-0 12-0 = IL 18.0 16-0 a BL-B 89-0 12:0 = FL (#20) | (OF-0) +084 (18-1) €F-0 86-0 9¢-1 ‘ord i) 0 [peqaos aumypo, | Sta |-qeroqyem) (99,A\) kg &g RCo] Aig UIBy) (gem) 41g : APTAwI :qgeeH oytoedg oyoedg tes (mreymq ‘aepy eT3seD) elsousemu yout ‘snorod ss & (spretyg yynog) yoedudéo ‘ouoysouny ‘useyy (eu04zs-Sursep ‘mersg “44) _ treeeeesee(KnueUION ‘uKQ) s “errrersnee (Suan “ppoysuRyy) SUOysouNT] *pTINg (a0}jz1[9) auoyspueg per ut s¢ idan) pant nee ‘WW UL yNysute A "OTRO SOO e eee reese eee esi aneee L‘ON “ - 9 ‘g F "SON 73 “ S230 pue V4 "SON, “ 17 eee meee eens asset eeseee T ‘ON ‘amojsountT youre g CEOS C17) sponsral 0A\4) Ke q pue y (jowmumy, yooT) su0jsem1] ureyuMopL SO SRSAINIRC RAINS [ABUL [ISSOT (purpzequing ) queq Wee eee meee weer reeasesseneese “ AayT194SO1,T “* giqreu [Issoy AUUOX[IY Seance eee eee ereeeteeeesenseeseeeass O[GAVUL [ISSOF Ystay asp CCEDEECOLEOC USOC CE DOCP CONC Fey doin} 001 uoo1s YSstay ia aleupiara “(q109) “ Pee DOS o UE OI SERIIAROOY (Wara(sjecay tela) aTqIVU poy Ree meee eee aneeseeereesessens aTqreut UBITIOIG oyIT MA AP eee eeeeewcnesesreeeses aTqareun UlaA UBITVIT 941 srrtsreeeees COmOyspoy)) § (puvsuseLs) OU0JSeIT p94se} oy Fo uomroadg {eyo pue ‘somoyjsoury ueisou “Sey pue Surpling ynys -U19,A 91910 Te) pues souoSouLT qoedun0y SOTqIeIN sottojspueg YOON Jo ssv[O 145 ROCKS. ON THE THERMAL CONDUCTIVITIES OF CERTAIN F6E00- 96800: TLI0- O9TO- 8820- (L100-) 0800. €900- g900- | Ace Jas Psauce Se N OFS | 98TOO- = cog | 86100- == raat 0200: (9.2) FOL 9600- = 88 FI1O0- = (¢29) |(9T00-) | (¢.8%) SEs G100- 0-99 98% GF00- = — = 6-8 { L3G FF00- == = — 0-2 { Ps Bae et oa eee 988 T100- (9.0) FELT | 9000- ‘aa j (<0#) |(¢z00-) 0.0 { 089 S100: E a = 00 1 (98%) |(¢g00-) 0:22 QL1g L100- 0-68 (zzg) |\(t¢00-) { siz | gcoo.s| 0 (sgt) |(¢200.) 0-0 { 910T | 6000: ae GLB 20 6800-4 it 0-28 009 ozoo: { 0-68 = = { (0-22) 0-07 OLF-0 003-0 OF-0 g89:0 69-0 OF-0 (6-0) OF-0 99.0 (11-0) 99-0 0L-0 (68-0) £0 (1F-0) OF-0 (¥-0) 86-0 1-0 (8¥-0) LV.0 (99.0) 8-0 (99-0) #£-0 (69-0) €6.0 (48.0) 9F-0 (13.0) 62-0 (92-0) 96-0 (82-0) F¥-0 (91-0) T¥#0 S81-0 L61-0 80-0 SC1-0 06-0 61-0 (69-0) 88-0 82-0 (62-0) 83-0 16-0 (12-0) 61-0 06-0 (62-0) 1-0 62-0 (8-0) 18-0 (18-0) 61-0. (8-0) 06-0 (62-0) 981-0 (9F-0) 2-0 (82-0) 02-0 (18-0) 6-0 = OFS-G = BF9-G 06-7 2 99-F == 60-8 _ 10-2 = oLF S| (9¢-1) 60-1 = 63-3 (FF-2) 68-3 =— 19-3 (18-1) 9L-T S| (et) 98-1 (e#-1) 68-1 68-1 (16-1) ea) 902 aide tT a (20-2) Ler{ ; it 90-6 ear I8- [¥-92] | (es-1) L-6L 0-6 [2-22] | (00-2) T-L8 : ma 10:3 Leet 29-1 (66-1) 08 { 29-1 (9T-2) $81 Gee ie ore ans see Op) pauersno4 ‘ssers oures ouL restetseteeserserens “sam £ (soqerd omg) seeps aqeiy (zqxenb jo ‘ord gz yytM pestedsiayur) vusyex Lap Seeeet ae tee ge goto eee me eC ERG woIyT POOP OOOO eee eee eet ereeeeeeteseasese redsr1ony,q FPSO reds Aavoy (Aytyenb ysouy { 0q27d qyS1z v) SIIvg JO 1oyse_q se etaee eee ee eer sees eee eee eee er rr Iaqseqeye YsIpsuy (Treautop) « (T[eMurt0p) outyuedies pay reteseeeestsesaneserersssesessereaeseeseeteees B09 ge maar TOR ee mea weeeetecereees Peet ere eeeeeeesesesestes (0) (aopsetg) “ Seem ee areas eet eseenre (a) (uopéetg) : (v¥) Caopdetg) teoo touuep eee eee eer er ere rT ery **'*:(aTqsevomen) yeoo asnoy POO esses ee eeeeeeseens COOP e eee eteressesenes Theseeeeeseene WONG Surpring poy Certo terres eeees (@seoMeN) YOrtq Sarprmq plo feeeee ‘wm ‘sayetd omy ! (O¥SvoOMEN) WOrtq-artyT go tays tebe tse eetteaee Cts (ate Gee ania ySnoy, The RE ea SILER ICR CSCO 9017) OFITAL oul, FTO O eee e eerste seers eseneseeeeseesees yey o4TGM omg (ea0jspoy) ATRyO CO (eousy ‘fo1sustg) ayIsouseyy ‘ow “WBS YOoy “Toyseqely ‘aurquediag e700 pue eog yong pue ‘kel ‘pueg 146 REPORT— 1878. Report of the Committee, consisting of the Rev. H. F. Barnus- Lawrence, C. Spence Barn, Hsq., H. E. Dresser, Esq. (Sec.), Dr. A. GiintHEr, J. E. Hartinea, Lsq., Dr. Gwyn Jerrreys, Pro- fessor Newton, and the Rev. Canon Tristram, appointed for the purpose of inquiring into the possibility of establishing a * Close Time” for Indigenous Animals. Ir is with regret that your Committee has to report that, for the first time since its original appointment in August 1868, the work it has not unsuc- cessfully had in hand has been brought in question, and this in a way which requires serious attention on the part of all who wish to preserve our indigenous animals from the extermination that, until the last few years, was threatening so many of them. In July 1877, it having been reported to Her Majesty’s Secretary of State for the Home Department that ‘the Herring Fishery on the coast of Scotland is in an unsatisfactory state, and that it is desirable that inquiries should be made to ascertain whether any legislative regulations would tend to promote the welfare of the fishermen engaged in the said fishery, and to increase the supply of herrings for the benefit of the public,” that gentleman appointed Mr. Buckland, Mr. Spencer Walpole, and Mr. Archibald Young to be Commissioners to make such inquiries and to report to him the result thereof. In accordance therewith the Commissioners above named reported to the Home Secretary, under date of March 1, 1878, and their ‘ Report,’ with ‘ Appendices,’ was subsequently presented to both Houses of Par- lament by command of Her Majesty. This ‘ Report,’ containing certain conclusions arrived at by the Com- missioners, naturally attracted the notice of your Committee; and after due consideration it was resolved that a letter should be addressed on behalf of your Committee to the Home Secretary in regard to some of those conclusions. The following is a copy of the letter thereupon sent :— “To the Right Honourable R. A. Cross, H.M. Principal Secretary of State for the Home Department. “6 Tenterden Street, Hanover Square, W., “London, July 6, 1878. ** Sir, —The Committee of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, appointed for the purpose of inquiring into the possibility of establishing a close time for indigenous animals, having had under their consideration the ‘Report on the Herring Fisheries of Scotland,’ dated March 1, 1878, and the conclusions at which the Commissioners have arrived (pp. xxxv., xxxvi. of that Report), beg leave respectfully to sub- mit to your consideration the following observations, viz. :— ‘J. That conclusions Nos. 2 and 8 of the Commissioners—viz., that ‘legislation in past periods has had no appreciable effect,’ and that ‘nothing that man has yet done, and nothing that man is likely to do, ON ESTABLISHING A “‘ CLOSE TIME” FOR INDIGENOUS ANIMALS. 147 has diminished, or is likely to diminish, the general stock of herrings in the sea’—if correct, are absolutely contradicted by conclusion No. 13, which recommends that ‘The Sea-Birds Preservation Act, protecting gannets and other predaceous birds which cause a vast annual destruction of herrings, should be repealed in so far as it applies to Scotland.’ “TI. That conclusion No. 1, stating that ‘ the Herring Fishery on the coast of Scotland, as a whole, has increased and is increasing,’ clearly shows that there can be no necessity for the step recommended in conclu- sion No. 13 as above cited. “TIT. That conclusion No. 13 seems to have been arrived at from ex- aggerated or incorrect information, as will appear from the following con- siderations:—The number of gannets on Ailsa is estimated (Report, p- x1.) at 10,000, and a yearly consumption of 21,600,000 herrings is assigned to them; while the Commissioners assume that there are ‘ 50 gannets in the rest of Scotland for every one on Ailsa,’ and on that assumption declare that the total destruction of herrings by Scottish gannets is more than 1,110,000,000 per annum. ‘This is evidently a mis- calculation; for, on the premisses, this last number should be 1,101,000,000, a difference of more than 8,000,000. “But, more than this, supposing the figures at the outset are right, it appears to the Close Time Committee that the succeeding assumption of the Commissioners must be altogether wrong; at any rate there is no evidence adduced in its support, and some that is contradictory of it. “The number of breeding-places of the gannet in the Scottish seas has long been known to be five only, as, indeed, is admitted by one of the Commissioners (Appendix No. 2, p. 171); and the evidence of Captain M‘Donald, which is quoted in a note to the same passage, while estimating the Ailsa gannets at 12,000 in 1869 (not 1859, as printed), puts the whole number of Scottish gannets at 324,000 instead of 510,000, which there would be at the rate of 50 in the rest of Scotland for one on Ailsa, accord- ing to the Commissioners’ assumption. “Moreover, 50,000 of these 324,000 birds, or nearly one-sixth, are admitted by this same Commissioner to be ‘of great value to the inhabit- ants’ of St. Kilda; and, indeed, they are of far greater value to them than any number of herrings, since it is perfectly well known that the people of St. Kilda could hardly live without their birds; therefore this 50,000 must be omitted from any estimate of detriment, Deducting, then, 50,000 from Captain M‘Donald’s 324,000, we have 274,000, and these, at the Commissicners’ estimate, would consume 600,060,000 her- rings instead of the 1,110,000,000 alleged by the Report, and, therefore, nearly 200,000,000 fewer than the Commissioners’ estimate of the annual take of the Scottish fisheries (800,000,000)—25 per cent. less, instead of 37 per cent. more. “Hitherto the supposition of the Report, that the gannets frequent the Scottish seas all the year round, has been followed ; but the Close Time Committee begs leave to observe that, as a matter of fact, these birds are not there in force for more than half the year. “ This, then, will require another abatement to be made. Not to exag- gerate the case, the Committee assumes them to frequent these waters seven months, or seven-twelfths of a year. This will make their annual capture of herrings 350,350,000, instead of the more than 1,110,000,000 L2 148 REPORT—1878. of the Commissioners, being nearly 700,000,000, or much less than one- third, fewer. “TV. That in all the evidence received and published by the Commis- sioners only two witnesses allege that any harm has resulted to the fisheries from the Sea-Birds Protection Act. Of. these, the first, Robert M‘Connell, presented a petition from the fishermen of Girvan, in which it is stated (p. 145) that ‘no legislation is called for or required;’ while another witness from the same place, John Melville (a fishery officer), declares (at p- 146) that ‘the fishery has very much increased this last year. Recent years have also shown a gradual increase. The increase is partly due to the increased machinery, and partly to the increase in the number of herrings.’ “The second witness unfavourable to the Act, John M‘William (an In- spector of Poor), speaks (pp. 147-49) only from personal knowledge acquired between 1833 and 1853, when he ceased to be a fisherman, and not from any recent experience. He can therefore scarcely be held com- petent to give an opinion of his own as to whether the Sea-Birds Pro- tection Act (passed in 1869) has injured the fisheries. Another witness recommends the repeal of this Act ; but he, Hugh MacLachlan, expressly states (p. 143) that he ‘thinks the cause of the decrease [in the number of herrings taken] is the catching immature fish;’ and the remedy he proposes is the adoption of a strict close time. ““V. That, on the other hand, the utility of sea-birds in pointing out the situation of shoals of herrings and other fish is not only generally notorious, but is even admitted in the Report (pp. 57 and 175). “VI. That if the Sea-Birds Act be repealed on the grounds alleged for Scotland, its repeal for England and Ireland must logically follow; and this Committee trusts that no steps may be taken to repeal the Act for Scotland. “T am, Sir, ** Yours obediently, ‘*H. EH. Dresser, “ Sec. to the Brit. Assoc. Close Time Committee.” To this letter the following reply has been received :— Whitehall, July 12, 1878. “‘Srr,—I am directed by the Secretary of State to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 6th inst., submitting observations on behalf of the Committee of the British Association for the Advancement of Science on the Report of the Commissioners appointed to inquire into the herring fisheries of Scotland, dated the 1st March last. “T am, Sir, “Your obedient servant, (Signed) ‘“Goprrey LusHineron. “, E. Dresser, Esq., 6 Tenterden Street, Hanover Square, W.” Your Committee conceives that the points at issue between it and the Scottish Herring Fishery Commissioners are thus fairly stated, and is confident that all unbiassed persons will admit that those Commissioners have over-stated their case. Your Committee would further remark that, ON OCCUPATION OF A TABLE AT THE ZOOLOGICAL STATION AT NAPLES. 149 though the Sea-Birds Preservation Act contains a provision (in section 3) for varying the close time therein enacted on due application, no such application appears ever to have been made on the ground of detriment to the herring fisheries caused by sea-birds; while there can be no reason- able doubt that any application for shortening the close time on that ground, if duly made, would be granted—circumstances which would seem to show that the conclusions of the Commissioners were not gene- rally shared by those interested in the fisheries. On the other hand, your Committee may refer to the fact, already mentioned in former Reports, that several applications have been made for prolonging the existence of the close time. With regard to the Wild-Fow] Preservation Act your Committee has to report that the discontent caused by its establishing a close time, different from that which was originally proposed by your Committee, still exists in some quarters, but that the power of variation the Act con- tains has been put in force in many counties ; and your Committee trusts when this power has been still further exercised, as it doubtless will be, and the Act practically brought into accordance with your Committee’s first proposal, of which there are many indications, dissatisfaction will be reduced to a minimum, or will altogether cease. A Bill for the Protection of Freshwater Fish has been introduced into Parliament during the present Session, and will doubtless receive the Royal assent. It has not, however, been of a kind that needed any action on the part of your Committee. In view of any proceedings which may be taken in the Session of 1879 in regard to the recommendations of the Scottish Herring Fishery Com- missioners already recited, as well as on general grounds, your Committee respectfully urges its reappointment. Report of the Committee appointed for the purpose of arranging with Dr. Dorn for the occupation of a Table at the Zoological Station at Naples; the Committee consisting of Mr. Dew-SmitH (Secretary), Professor Huxtry, Dr. CARPENTER, Dr. GwYN JEFFREYS, Mr. Sctater, Dr. M. Foster, Mr. F. M. Batrour, and Professor Ray LANKESTER. Your Committee have the honour to report that the working of the Zoo- logical Station is proceeding in the most satisfactory manner, and that its efficiency has greatly increased since the last report was made. Since August 1, 1877, no less than twenty-one naturalists have been engaged in working at the Station, which is a larger number than in any former year. The steam launch presented by the Berlin Academy of Sciences has been of great service in providing animals found at a distance from Naples, and of short-lived animals requiring rapid transit, to enable them to be used in a sufficiently fresh condition. 150 REPORT——1878. Of late, one of the main objects of the Station has been largely de- veloped, viz., the supplying of animals for research, and for museum specimens at a small cost to persons applying for them. The animals are procured and preserved by the staff at the Station, and are sent off and charged for at the bare cost of the animals, plus the cost of the preservation solutions. Since August 1, 1877, packages of specimens have been sent to forty- nine different naturalists residing in various parts of the werld. A list is appended to this report, giving the names of those to whom the speci- mens were sent, and also the nature of the specimens themselves. The scientific work of the Station is progressing well, as the following list of monographs preparing for publication will show :— On) ChenOpHorid ew vecteensccpesewoss coos sieves sss scedoe By Dr. Chun. pe DALAMODIOSSHS) Reser ose cee sctevecvor cclecc see euscontd » Dr. Spengel. poe SIUPUMCULOIGE). vende sede toed snbiealss oeccsacseeswas » Dr. Spengel. 5» Capitellidz (Ammelida) .........sscsscccccesees » Dr. Hisig. po CAPLO LING Ze ven cnn oscuceccasscscceiarctessdcemss epee » Dr. Mayer. pot PY CHOPOMIGIO ccc odipsacsoseseccesets asdeosetasete » Dr Dohrn. SS MNT Vice tn rete ccc ceaesciceseecestasoteccasens » Dr. Emery. WOMEN PCLIGGS o tetveccesertsrssscvtasdscesteccakececevsls » Dr. Mayer. Also several algological monographs by Dr. Falkenberg, Dr. Schaiitz, and Professor Solms-Laubach are nearly ready, besides many papers on minor investigations. We hear that the monographs on Ctenophoridx, by Dr. Chun, and on Balanoglossus, by Dr. Spengel, are already in the press. We very much regret that no naturalists have availed themselves of the use of the table engaged by the Association, and we would suggest that members should endeavour to make it more widely known that naturalists desirous of working at some group of animals may, with the consent of the Committee, proceed to Naples, and there find every con- venience for their work, including material and use of the steam launch for dredging purposes, supplied to them free of all cost. Lastly, we very strongly urge the desirability of renewing the grant of £75, as although, as we have shown, the Station is ina most prosperous condition, still it can only remain so when liberally supported by public bodies interested in the advancement of science. List of the Naturalists who have worked wm the Station from August 1, 1877, to August 1, 1878. Prof. Th. Eimer, Tii- INGEN gaye: -ceh ase Table Wiirtemberg 18 August 1877 to 4 September 1877 Dr. Bonnet, Munich... ,, Bavaria 20° 55 Stes 4 oa Fe Prof. Stendner, Halle ,, Prussia 2Dir ss ». 9 Ld October 4 Prof. His, Leipzig. .... ,, Saxony 7 September ,, ,, 27 September ,, Prof. Graf Salms-Lau- bach, Strasburg...... » Strasburg 26 * 959 24 October ae Dr. Taschenberg, Leip- DiS oss. cacceyeeuatrenee 5» Saxony 3 November ,, 4, 28 June 1878 Dr. P. Mayer, Liiden- SCheid Metts. cence onene » Prussia 1 January 1878 ,, = Dr. Zincone, Naples... ,, Italy 1 PY} — : ’ Dr. Dela Valle, Naples ,, Italy 1 January 1878 ) = . ON OCCUPATION OF A TABLE AT THE ZOOLOGICAL STATION AT NAPLES. 151 Dr. A. Lang, Berne ...Table Switzerland 14 January 1878 to 7 May 1878 Dr. Schmitz, Kassel... ,, Prussia DE as ) aeOune hy Dr. R. Valiante, Naples ., Italy 1 Hebruary 5, | 4, — ss Dr. E. Everts, Hague ,, Holland 11 March » 9» 18 May on Dr. V. Koch, Darm- RRP s crewc(o.s' discisieje's » Darmstadt 12 ,, Se ey abs ace oc Prof. Graf Salms-Lau- bach, Strasbure....... » Strasburg 14 ,, 3) ea ezoeapril as Dr. C. Chun, Frank- ,,_ Berlin Aca- RESUME atee va'clesisecseudaes demy 14 =4,; “sh ay teh a Dr. v. Rohlfs, Leipzig ,, Saxony 2085; op » 18 May re Dr. L. Graff, Aschaffen- REPO e ances ccce ss ++ 5, Bavaria SL 135 Paster ies diode Bee a Professor Metchinkoff, OGESSA.......00c20eeeee. » Russia es a orcune ”» Prof. v. Rougemont, Neuchatel ........ es. 9) Switzerland 8 May Gy 2 July 3 Dr. Emery, Naples ... ,, Italy 28 June ‘sess — List of Naturalists and Places to which Animals nave been sent from August 1, 1877, to August 1, 1878. Aug. 1877. 1 Dr. M. Lanzi Mr. Balfour Dr. Grobben Prof, Studer Prof. Eimer Prof, Greeff Prof, Gétte Prof. Heller Anat. Institute L. Blaschka Prof. Hoffmann Kgl. Naturaliencab. Prof. Ausserer Museo Zoologico W. Percy Sladen Prof. Greeff Zool, Museum fKgl. ©. Thierarznei- ( Schule \ Professor Kollmann Prof, F. E. Schulze Zool. Station C. Armbruster Prof. Ehlers Dr. Emery A. Waters Prof, Semper Prof. Todaro H. Karthaus Dr. Ludwig Rome Paris Vienna Berne Tiibingen Marburg Strassburg Innsbruck Halle Dresden Leyden Stuttgart Graz Palermo Halifax Marburg Berlin Munich Munich Graz Trieste London Gottingen Palermo Woodbrook Wiirzburg Rome Marburg Gottingen Salnee. Ascidia. Crustacea. Salpze, Coelenterata. Selachia. Miscellaneous. Embryos of Torpedo, and Scyllium. Crustacea. Miscellaneous. Mollusca, Coelenterata. Miscellaneous. do. do. Fishes. Echinodermata. Echinod., Coelent, Miscellaneous. dc. Heteropoda and Pteropoda. Spongide. Hydromedusz. Cephalopoda. Coelent., Echinod. Eyes of fishes. Bryozoa. Lamellibranchiata, Miscellaneous. do. Echinodermata. 152 REPORT—1878. 1878 April C. Stacy Watson London Fishes. 16 Prof. Claus Vienna Coelenterata. 30 Prof. Eimer Tiibingen Fishes, Echinod., Coelent. 30 | K. Felsche Leipzig Brachyura, 30 Dr. v. Thering Erlangen Mollusea. 30 Prof, Leuckart Leipzig Miscellaneous, May i Dr. Lang Berne do. 11 Dr. Everts Hague do. 14 Prof. Graff Aschaffenb. do. 15 | Prof. Hoffmann Leyden Eyes of Cephalop, and Pterop. 18 Dr. de Man Leyden Mollusca. 19 Zool, Cabinet St.Petersburg) Hydra polyps. 25 Prof. v. Koch Darmstadt | Mollusca, Coelent. 25 Prof. Steindachner | Vienna Fishes, Coelent, June 29 | Prof. de Rougemont | Neuchatel | Fishes. 29 Zoolog. Institute Halle Miscellaneous. July 27 Zoolog. Museum Berlin do. 31 K. Heider Graz Coelent. 31 Leeds Museum Leeds Mollusca, Fishes, Coelent., Vermes. 31 Dr. Preper Olfen Miscellaneous. Report of the Anthropometric Committee, consisting of Dr. Farr, Lord Aprerpare, Dr. W. Bain, Dr. Bzppor, Mr. Brasroox, Sir GrorGE CAMPBELL, Captain Ditton, The Ear oF Ducts, Professor Fiower, Mr. Distant, Mr. F. P. Frtiows, Mr. F. Gauton, Mr. Park Harrison, Mr. J. Herwoop, Mr. P. Hatierr, Major-Gen. Lanz Fox (Sec.), Inspector-General Lawson, Mr. Grorce SHaw Lerevre, Professor Leone Levi, Dr. WALLER Lewis, Dr. Mooat, Sir Rawson Rawson, Mr. ALzxanpER RepGRAve, and Professor Ro..eston. A consIpERABLE delay has been unavoidably incurred in preparing and circulating the schedules and accompanying instructions for collecting the desired observations, with a view of testing by practical experience the extent to which the Committee might look for useful results, and the sufficiency of the instructions to ensure both accuracy and uniformity. The work, therefore, has hitherto been rather tentative and experimental. The forms and instruments used by the Committee are: (1). Explicit instructions to observers on the mode of filling-in the blank schedules, and on the use of the instruments. (2). A schedule for the measure- ments and other observations. This contains, when fall, twenty names. (3). A printed circular, by Dr. Farr, explaining the objects of the Com- mittee. (4). Book of tinted papers, named and numbered, to assist observers in specifying the different colours of the hair. (5). A circular by Mr. Brabrook, in relation to photographs. (6). A diagram showing REPORT OF THE ANTHROPOMETRIC COMMITTEE. 153 the position in which the strength of arm should be tested; and (7) a card containing dots for testing eyesight. The instruments are: (1). A weighing machine. (2). A simple ap- paratus for measuring height. (3). A spirometer; and (4) a spring balance for testing strength of arm. Of these instrnaments the Committee have purchased four complete sets. A great number of the forms have been distributed to persons in various parts of the country. The schedules already filled up and received by the Committee relate to the measurements of the boys at Westminster School, the 2nd Royal Surrey Militia, letter-sorters in the General Post Office, recruits, persons employed in a large manufactory in Bedford, criminals; and a few relate to persons engaged in different occupations. Some of these, however, have not been taken strictly according to the instructions drawn out by the Committee, and some of them are of less value than the rest. Other measurements have been promised by Dr. Mouat; by the Rev. George Style, the head-master of a grammar-school in Yorkshire; by Dr. Farr ; and by Capt. Brown, of the 18th Kent Rifle Volunteers. Capt.Brown states, in his letter to Dr. Farr, that he will have much pleasure in fur- nishing measurements of the men in his corps—about 100; and that he will see personally the other eight commanding officers, and ask them to assist the Committee. Should Capt. Brown be able to obtain the whole, they will amount to about 900 men. Amongst those who have furnished the Committee with measurements may be mentioned the names of Major-General Lane Fox, Mr. Francis Galton, Inspector-General Lawson, Dr. Waller Lewis, Dr. Bain, Dr. Scott, the head-master of Westminster School, and Professor Rudler. A few sets of tables have been prepared from the above returns, show- ing the age and height, age and weight, age and strength, and average height, weight, and strength, as well as the ratio between height and weight and the ratio between height and strength. An extract from the tables relating to criminals has been drawn out by Mr. Francis Galton, as an illustration of one of the methods in which it is proposed to deal with facts collected by the Committee, to be circulated with their forms and instructions. General Lane Fox has written a full report on the measurements, which he personally superintended, of the 2nd Royal Surrey Militia; and from which he has prepared several tables, which are shown at the end of his report. His tables, though differently constructed, agree in nearly every particular with those prepared under the direction of Dr. Farr. It will be observed that several gentlemen have promised to furnish the Committee with measurements, and they hope soon to be in possession of such facts as will enable them to compare the results with the different classes of the population, and to determine the physical characters of persons born and living in different parts of the country. In the meantime the Committee abstain from submitting incomplete results; they, however, think the following short abstract from some of the tables alluded to may be of sufficient interest to deserve consideration. 154 REPORT—1878. Ratio Ratio es} between | between $ Averages height | height 2 and and 2 weight |strength a Asiwee no DQ = = Age 22/48 |2 |Se | See] eee 4 OD in en ape 60 8 oS ° oo ouU vo Seo Been 4 ra = q ve ak = ro cs 5) = ree ayes Ag 2 oA | 8] o-- || Pog | Sha gq s wc of Olona ao 5 HA | ad | Ss | ofa | oH a | 2" | 8" | G8 | gee | gee q <4 af aH 2 Aer Bogen o 'Z, VA! Non-commissioned officers and men 2nd Royal Surrey 13 IMATE y 2. cwadeeescee de sale'ess = = = — — Boys at Westminster School} 20 597 | 86:2 | 47:8 1-4 0:8 | General Post Office (letter- sorters, &¢.) ....... detent 36 559 | 74:7 | — 13 -- Non-commissioned ofticers and men 2nd Royal Surrey 4 ITIVE) eB aerenoee, Eoe BERET do — — — ; Boys at Westminster School| 48 61:3 | 95°3 | 55-6 16 0-9 | General Post Office (letter- RONDELS, OGCs))). bvswieesises se) we eies 503 60°3 | 93°3 | — 15 — Non-commissioned officers and men 2nd Royal Surrey 1p- | _ Militia ......eeeeeeseeeeeeeees — — os = as — Boys at Westminster School} 39 64°8 | 111°5 | 591 alee 0:9 | General Post Office (letter- SOGUETS; Ke.) (5.4. sak eee ses 670 61-7 | 1005 | — 16 = | Non-commissioned officers and men 2nd Royal Surrey 16 IMGINGIE ince sass ccs ssmthinewesas + 64:5 | 122°5 | 61:3 19 1:0 Boys at Westminster School} 43 66°5 |124:2 | 69°8 19 1-0 General Post Office (letter- SORDETS, WC) iis cvcesee skis sete 275 63°9 |}111°5 | — ie ( — Non-commissioned officers and men 2nd Royal Surrey 17 WVIGET AN cia ninor asides seeeeens 13 64:0 |119°4 | 61:7 IED 10 Boys at Westminster School | 18 67°8 |129°6 | 816 1:9 1-2 | General Post Office (letter- SDEUCIS, CGC.) )sddccostvessaseaes 124 65'4 |120°5 | — 2-0 i Non-commissioned officers and men 2nd Royal Surrey h 18 MUNA cst tore ccsnececedbeaes 35 64:7 |126°2 | 67-4 19 1:0 Boys at Westminster School 8 67°5 | 1381 | 92°5 2-0 1-4 General Post Office (letter- BOMLETS, (CC, )yacetecavecspte tess 98 65:4 | 123-3 — 1:9 — _ For the purpose of inquiring into and determining the typical forms of our race a sub-committee has been formed, consisting of Mr. Brabrook, Sir Rawson Rawson, Major-General Lane Fox, Mr. Francis Galton, Mr. Park Harrison, Professor Leone Levi, and Mr. Distant. The Report of the Sub-Committee is annexed hereto. In conclusion, it may be said that the Committee have now organised the system of observations, and have tested them sufficiently; they have distributed blank schedules, which they expect to have returned to them REPORT OF THE ANTHROPOMETRIC COMMITTEE. 155 filled up; they have also agreed on the more important points concerned in the forms of reduction of the raw materials. They are now prepared. with instruments sufficient to enter upon a large field of observation. They have expended £83 11s. 2d. in their prefatory work of the £100 that was voted to them, and have handed the residue back to the Treasurer. They now beg that the residue be re-granted to them, to- gether with an additional sum of £83 11s. 2d., which will put them in possession of £100 to carry on operations during the next year, which they trust will produce a valuable harvest of results. Wittiam Farr, July, 1878. Chairman of Anthropometric Committee. Rerort or Sus-ComMItrer. The Sub-Committee appointed by the Anthropometric Committee to deal with that portion of the reference to them which relates to “the publication of photographs of the typical races of the empire,” resolved in the first instance to limit the inquiry to the investigation, by means of photographs, of the national or local types of races prevailing in different parts of the United Kingdom. The plan which the Sub-Committee thought it best to adopt was to select a number of districts in which it is believed a distinct type prevails, and in each such district to request the assistance of as many competent observers as can be found; each to be asked to obtain a limited number of photographs, six to ten, representing in his opinion the type chiefly prevalent among individuals belonging to families long settled and inter- marrying in the district. From the materials thus obtained, the Sub- Committee hope to be able to select representative specimens. In the carrying out of this plan, the assistance of professional and amateur photographers, of medical men, and of clergymen, has been sought. A circular has been addressed to about a hundred members of the Association, and a letter has been published, by authority of the Committee, in the ‘Photographic News.’ This inquiry is one, however, in which almost every member of the Association may be able to assist, ’ and the Sub-Committee (presuming the Association will authorise the continuance of the work) appeal to the members generally for such assistance. The Sub-Committee recommend— 1. That the selected individuals should be adults. ’ 2. That the details of their pedigree, as far as possible, should be given. 3. That, in general, only those should be accepted whose two parents and four grandparents were born in or belonged to the district. 4. That the colour of hair and eyes should be stated, if practicable. 5. That the photographs should be accompanied by a written description = ae particular features they portray as being characteristic of the dis- rict. In pursuance of this plan, the Sub-Committee have received from Pro- fessor Rudler an excellent selection of 5 male and 5 female inhabitants of Aberystwith, which are laid upon the table, as specimens of the way in which the work should be done. Mr. Park Harrison, one of their body, has made a selection of types from Wales and Cornwall, and others from 156 REPORT—1 878. Sussex and Hast Kent. Miss Whitmore-Jones, of Chastleton House, Oxfordshire, has kindly arranged for the photographing of some of the inhabitants of that parish whose pedigree can be traced in the parish registers up to their very commencement, nearly 300 years ago. (Six groups thus obtained are laid upon the table.) Mr. Hooper, a skilled photographer, has promised to furnish the Sub-Committee with specimens from several districts. They have had also most liberally placed at their disposal the important collections which have been made during many years past by their colleague, Dr. Beddoe. The Rev. Mr. Crompton, in Norfolk, Mr. Spence Bate, in Cornwall, Mr. C. Staniland Wake, at Hull, Mr. Sorby, at Sheffield, Dr. Muirhead, for Scotland, and numerous others, have also kindly undertaken to collect photographs for the Sub-Committee. Collectors for Ireland are much wanted. Though the Sub-Committee are as yet only on the threshold of their task, and their operations have been hitherto tentative, they are hopeful of use- ful results. Their sense of the importance and interest of the work has grown with every step they have taken, and it is abundantly clear that, if not now completed, it will become more and more difficult in future years. The influence of railways has during the last fifty years greatly increased migration and intermixture, and -that influence must increase instead of diminishing. It has indeed been suggested to the Sub-Committee by some of their correspondents that the requirement as to pedigree is already too onerous for urban and manufacturing districts, and that in such cases it will be necessary to be content with proof that a mere majority of the three generations, and not the whole, belong to the dis- trict. The Sub-Committee respectfully recommend that they be reappointed, with the view of pressing forward the work to completion. They would be glad if a few practical photographers could be added to their number ; and they again ask for the assistance of any competent persons who will undertake to select six or ten typical photographs in the district they know best, and for any other aid in carrying out the undertaking that the members can give. : In connexion with this branch of the subject, the Sub-Committee have watched with much interest the experiments of their colleague, Mr. Francis Galton, in preparing compound photographs from several individuals belonging to the same category. Indealing with the features of criminals, Mr. Galton has produced some remarkable results, and the Sub-Committee will not fail to inquire whether an application of his process would not be useful for their own purposes in generalising the peculiar features observed in different localities. Though the Sub-Committee have of necessity postponed the collection of photographs of races of the empire outside the United Kingdom, Sir Rawson Rawson has been kind enough to obtain for them from the Colonial Office a set of the very fine series of photographs which that department obtained some years ago under the advice of Professor Huxley ; and the authorities of the India Office have also kindly placed at the dis- posal of the Sub-Committee their valuable collection of photographs of Indian races. For the Sub-Committee, E. W. Brasrooxk. July, 1878. ON THE USE OF STEEL FOR STRUCTURAL PURPOSES. 157 Report of the Committee, consisting of Dr. A. W. WinutaMson, Pro- fessor Sir Witt1am Txuomson, Mr. Bramwett, Mr. Sr. Joun Vin- cent Day, Dr. C. W. Siemens, Mr. C. W. Merririetp, Dr. NEILSon Hancock, Mr. F. J. Ase, Mr. J. R. Napier, Captain Doveras Gaxton, Mr. Newmarcu, Mr. E. H. Carsurr, and Mr. Macrory, appointed for the purpose of watching and reporting to the Council on Patent Legislation. Tus Committee begs leave to report that, with the exception of the introduction of a Bill on the Patent Law by a private member, which Bill was not proceeded with, there has not been any attempt at legisla- tion on the subject. The Committee request that they may be reap- pointed. Report of the Committee, consisting of Mr. W. H. Bartow, Mr. H. Bessemer, Mr. F. J. Bramwett, Captain Dovenas Garon, Sir Joun Hawksuaw, Dr. C. W. Siemens, Professor ABrL, and Mr. E. H. Carsurt (Sec.), appointed for the purpose of considering the Use of Steel for Structural Purposes. Owine to the action of your Committee, the Board of Trade requested two of your members, viz., Sir John Hawkshaw, F.R.S., and Mr. W. H. Barlow, F.R.S., to co-operate with Colonel Yolland, ‘to consider whether it is practicable to assign a safe co-efficient for steel.” After a long and careful consideration they, on March 19, 1877, re- ported as follows :— i “We assume that with steel, as with iron, the engineer will take care that, as well as the required strength, he secures a proper amount of ductility. “ Having given the subject our best consideration, we recommend that the employment of steel in engineering structures should be authorised by the Board of Trade under the following conditions, namely :— “1. That the steel employed should be cast steel or steel made by some process of fusion, subsequently roiled or hammered, and that it should be of a quality possessing considerable toughness and ductility, and that a certificate to the effect that the steel is of this description and quality should be forwarded to the Board of Trade by the engineer responsible for the structure. “2. That the greatest load which can be brought upon the bridge or structure, added to the weight of the superstructure, should not produce a greater strain in any part than 64 tons per square inch. “In conclusion we have to remark that in recommending a co-efficient of 63 tons per square inch for the employment of steel in railway struc- tures generally, we are aware that cases may and probably will arise when it will be proposed to use steel of special make and still greater tenacity, and when a higher co-efficient might be permissible; but we think those 158 REPORT—1878. cases must be left for consideration when they arise, and that a higher co- efficient may be then allowed in those instances where the reasons given appear to the Board of Trade to justify it. “Weare, &., (Signed) “ Joun HawxsHaw, ““W. YOLLAND, “W. H. Bartow. “The Secretary of the Board of Trade, &c.” This Report has since been acted upon by the Board of Trade in the printed paper issued by them in reference to railway structures. It will be observed that a co-efficient of 64 tons per square inch is assigned to steel, that of iron being 5 tons per square inch. This increase of the co-efficient will effect important economy in structures, especially in bridges of large spans, and will also tend gene- rally to increase the employment of steel for railway and shipbuilding purposes. The labours of your Committee having ended in such a satisfactory manner, there is no necessity to reappoint them. Report on the Geographical Distribution of the Chiroptera. By G. E. Dosson, M.A., M.B. [A communication ordered by the General Committee to be printed tn eatenso among the Reports. ] In his work on the Geographical Distribution of Animals, published scarcely two years ago, Mr. Wallace writes :—‘‘ The genera of Chiroptera are in a state of great confusion, the names used by different authors being often not at all comparable, so that the few details given of the distribution of the bats are not trustworthy. We have therefore made little use of this order in the theoretical part of the work.” And again: “The bats are a very difficult study, and itis quite uncertain how many distinct species there are; the genera are exceedingly numerous, but they are in a very unsettled state, and the synonymy is exceedingly confused. The details of their distribution cannot therefore be usefully entered upon here.”’ These remarks furnish a suitable preface to this paper. The recent publication of my work on the Chiroptera renders them, I hope, no longer applicable, and I purpose now to set forth in greater detail the results of my inquiries into the geographical distribution of these animals than the space at my disposal in the introduction to the work referred to has per- mitted. Mr. Wallace points out the pre-eminent importance of the distribution of Mammals in determining the limits of zoological regions ; but also remarks that, “there are two groups which have quite exceptional means of dispersal—the bats which fly, and the cetacea, seals, &c., which swim. The former are capable of traversing considerable spaces of sea, since two ) ON THE GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE CHIROPTERA. 159 _ North American species either regularly or occasionally visit the Ber- mudas, a distance of 600 miles from the mainland.”’ I do not think that the occurrence of two American species of bats in the Bermudas affords much proof of the general capability of the species of Chiroptera in traversing considerable spaces of sea, for it is exceedingly probable that the few individuals which have been noticed there have been carried thither by storms (to which cause is evidently due the great number of straggling species of birds which have been found there), or have been imported into the island while hybernating in the holds of vessels, or are the descendants of such accidentally imported individuals, However, even if it be granted that the Chiroptera possess great powers of dispersal, it is certain that quite nine-tenths of the species avail them- selves of them in a very limited degree indeed, and it is significant that the distribution of the species is limited by barriers similar to those which govern it in the case of other species of mammals. This is well shown by the small number of species which are known to inhabit more than one of the recognised zoological regions, which amount to 22 only out of 400. The following list includes these species, and shows also their distribution. 1. Pteropus hypomelanus ....0cccceeseeeees Australian and Oriental. 2. Macroglossus ManiMmus .sccccceceesereeee Oriental and Australian. , 3. Rhinolophus ferrwm-equinwm ....000+ Ethiopian and Palearctic. 4, Vesperugo s€70tinus ..scesecseessceseeves All regions except the Australian, 5. Vesperugo noct ula ......csgeveeeccecreeees Ethiopian, Oriental, Palearctic. 6. Vesperugo Mars ..sccececccserccsececees Oriental and Palearctic. JT. Vesperugo G07 QMus..c.ccccececsereeveecece Oriental and Australian, 8. Vesperrigo Kunin .........o.seedesoesoree Oriental and Palearctic. 9. Wyecticejus crepusculanis ....00.cceeee Nearctic and Neotropical. 10. Atalapha noveboracensis ........... ,... Nearctic and Neotropical. WLS Atalapna cinerea ....cccrcecgeeacesgerere Nearctic and Neotropical. 12. Harpiocephalus har pra .....ccc.ccceeeees Oriental and Australian. 13. Vespertilio Adversus ......eceesseceeeees Oriental and Australian. 14. Vespertilio Capaccinti ...secccrssrevenee Oriental and Palearctic. 15. Vespertilio danubentontt .........ceeeeeree Palearctic and Oriental. 16. Vespertilio muricola ....cscccecereceeeees Oriental and Australian, 17. Vespertilio Tctfrugus ....ccecececeecsecees Nearctic and Neotropical, 18. Kerivowla har dmichit..ccccccccccoessceces Oriental and Australian. 19. Miniopterus schreibersit ..sccccscaseee Oriental, Australian, Ethiopian, and Palearctic. 20. Taphozous nUdiventrts ...cecccecseseeees Ethiopian, Oriental, and Palearctic. 21. Rhinopoma microphyllum,.....c.ece0e- Ethiopian, Oriental, and Palzarctic. 22. Nyctinomus brasiliensis ....0.:.....00e Neotropical and Nearctic. Estimating the total number of known species of Chiroptera at 400, it follows that 55 per cent. only wander beyond their respective zoological regions, or, in other words, 944 per cent. are characteristic. It is also noticeable that more than two-thirds of these wandering species belong to the family Vespertilionide, which has by far the widest geographical distribution, and includes the least specialised forms. The following table exhibits the numbers of families, genera, and species inhabiting each zoological region; and shows that in the regions situated principally within the tropics (as the Oriental and Neotropical regions) the number of species is more than three times that of those lying chiefly in the temperate zones (as the Nearctic and Palearctic regions). 160 REPORT—1878. Palearctic Ethiopian Oriental Australian | Neotropical \ Nearctic 8 8 g FS | 3 }a{.! alelsiaigig |jele\3elelsielé|siaisi4 Bl/o(a}ealélia lalolalel(sla|els| a lals ja | Pteropodidee .-|—|—|—]} 1] 3 /}18}} 1) 5} 20 1) 7 133) —)}— jt | Rhinolophide ...)1]2| 5} 1) 3/11], 1| 3] 28 ]}1]3] 6|—|/—| —|J— —— Nycteridie ...... | jh P| i UR VP a Wn Ps: Tolslhelel eleoicic Vespertilionide.| 1 | 7 ]25|/ 1) 6 |28|) 1) 6) 47 |} 1] 7 {18} 1) 5} 24 |} 1) 5 14 Emballonuride..| 1 | 2] 2/|/1/5/18})1/5)13]}1/4] 7) 1] 8) 2@)1)1/1 Phyllostomide...] —|—|—|/—|—|— || —|—| — ||—|—|]—]} 1 | 81] 65 ||— pigs Sella Ae Pisa ee CA lice | an co Total . 3 }11]32)| 5 |} 19) 83|| 5 |}21)111}) 4 | 21) 64)! 3 | 44/105) 2) 6 - In considering the geographical distribution of each family of the Chiroptera and the range of its genera and species, I think it well to: commence with the Vespertilionide and Emballonuride, as these alone are to any extent cosmopolitan in their distribution. Of the sixteen genera of Vespertilionide five (Antrozous, Nycticejus, Atalapha, Natalus and Thyroptera), are peculiar to America, but these are represented by nine species only. Of the remaining eleven genera, eight are peculiar to the Eastern hemisphere, and of these Nyctophilus and Chalinolobus (subgen.) are limited to the Australian region; Synotus, Otonycteris, and Plecotus (subgen.) to the Palearctic. A second species of Plecotus (the type of a well-defined subgenus Corinorhinus) is found in the Nearctic region only. Two genera alone, Vesperugo and Vespertilio are cosmopolitan ; but of the fifty species of the former, eleven only inhabit America, and the few American species of the latter genus are closely related to one another. A single species of Vespertilionide—Vesperugo serotinus—is alone known with certainty to extend intv both hemispheres, although it is probable that V. abramus and V. borealis may be found hereafter to have as wide a distribution. Although the genera of Emballonurids are much more equally distri- buted in number between the two hemispheres, half of the whole being American, a single genus alone, Nyctinomus, is common to both, and it is worthy of note that, of the twenty-one species of this genus, four only inhabit America, and these are all closely related to one another, and very far removed from any of the Old World species. Furia, Amorphocheilus, Rhynchonycteris, Saccopteryx, Diclidurus, Noctilio, and Molossus, repre- sented by twenty-six species, are peculiar to the Neotropical region, while the remaining genera with thirty-seven species are limited to the Hastern hemisphere. Of these Mystacina with a single species is found in New Zealand only. Colewra appears to be limited to East Africa and the Malagasy subregion, but the species from these subregions are very distinct. Emballonura extends from Madagascar to the Malay Archipelago, and throughout the larger islands of the Polynesian subregion, but has not been recorded from any part of the adjacent continents. The Neotropical genera of this family are, on the whole, more closely related to each other than to any of the old world genera; nevertheless there are certain peculiar forms of limited distribution in the Hastern hemisphere, which seem to have their nearest allies among neotropical species. Thus, the very remarkable species, Cheiromeles torquatus, which has not been found beyond the Indo-Malayan subregion, appears to be ON THE GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE CHIROPTERA. 161 closely related to some of the species of the Neotropical genus Molossus than to any of the Old World forms; and the same remark applies to Nyctinomus australis, which is characteristic of the Australian region. Although the Emballonuride have as wide an eastwardly and west- wardly distribution as the Vespertilionidsw, yet they are far exceeded by the latter family in their northern and southern range. While the Vespertilionidz extend in the Northern hemisphere as far as the isothermal of 32° Fahr. or thereabouts, the Emballonuride are rarely found north or south of the isothermal of 55°. The Rhinolophidx are limited to the Eastern hemisphere, and within these limits the species have much less extended bounds than even those of the preceding family. No species has as yet been recorded with cer- tainty from the Polynesian subregion, from Tasmania, or from New Zealand. With the exception of Rhinolophus ferrwm-equinum, which extends throughout the Ethiopian and warmer parts of the Palearctic region, the species of this family inhabiting each of the zoological regions comprised within the area of its distribution are distinct and charac- teristic. No species of the subfamily Phyllorhinine extends into the Palearctic region ; Celops is limited to the Oriental region, and Rhino- nycteris to the Australian ; these last two genera, however, include but a single species each. The very remarkable forms Phyllorhina commer- soni and Ph. cyclops belong to the Ethiopian region, but the former species alone extends int> the Malagasy subregion. The Nycteride are limited to the Ethiopian and Oriental regions, one species only passing slightly beyond the limits of the latter region, and none have as yet been found in the Malagasy subregion of the former. The Hthiopian species of the genus Megaderma are more closely related to each other than to the Oriental species. The distribution of Nycteris is remarkable: six species are limited to the Ethopian region, the seventh is found in Java, and differs from all the rest in the large size of the second lower premolar. The Phyllostomide present the only instance of a family of Chiroptera limited to a single zoological region. None of the species are known with certainty to inhabit permanently any of the countries beyond the recognized limits of the Neotropical region. This family is therefore eminently characteristic of that region. Although Central America and Southern Mexico have representatives of almost every genus of Phyllo- stomidée, none of the species have been, with any certainty, reeorded from the Southern States of North America, though the mean annual tempera- ture of a great part of these countries equals or exceeds that of many parts of South America where representatives of the family are abundant. It is worthy of note that Macrotus waterhousii, which has been alone found as far north as Cape St. Lucas in California, is apparently omnivorous, living indifferently on fruit, insects, and probably on small bats; and Trachyops cirrhosus recorded doubtfully from South Carolina and from Bermuda, is evidently, judging from its structure, of the same habits. The power possessed by these species of varying their food evidentl renders them more capable of extending their range beyond the limits of their original homes. Few, if any, of the species of this family, in the present state of our knowledge, can be said to be characteristic of any of! the Neotropical subregions; but certain species appear to be limited in’ their distribution within the region. | aes Megachiroptera, represented by the single family Pteropodide, ate: __M : a 162 REPORT—1 878. present probably more peculiarities in their distribution than any other group of Chiroptera. Like the Rhinolophide and Nycteride, they are strictly limited to the Old World, and scarcely extend anywhere beyond the tropics. Their limitation to the tropical parts is easily explained by a consideration of the fact that there only is found a continuous supply at all seasons of the tree-fruits on which they subsist; but this does not account for certain peculiarities in their distribution in an eastwardly or westwardly direction. While the family is distributed throughout the Ethiopian, Oriental, and Australian regions (except Tasmania and New Zealand), a single genus only, Cynonycteris, extends throughont all these regions. Hpomophorus, which includes certain species so different from all other Megachiroptera, as to almost necessitate the formation of a distinct subfamily for their reception, is strictly limited to that part of the Ethiopian region included within the continent of Africa. Cynopterus is also limited to the Oriental region ; a single anomalous species, C. latidens (which differs widely from all the other species in the form of its teeth) being found in the Moluccas. Honycteris is, as yet, known from the Indo-Malayan subregion alone; Notopteris appears to be limited to the Polynesian subregion; Harpyia and Cephalotes are characteristic of the Austro-Malayan subregion. The distribution of the genus Pteropus (which includes more than half the whole number of the species of Pteropodide) is more remarkable than that of any of the other genera of Chiroptera. The Comoro Islands in the Mozambique Channel form its westward limit, thence the species extend throughout the Malagasy subregion, even to the small hurricane- swept island of Rodriguez (from which I have lately described a new species), and northwards through the Amirantes and Seychelle Islands to India, where their westward limit is found at the southern frontier of Baluchistan : from India they extend eastwards throughout the Oriental and Australian regions (except Tasmania and New Zealand), inhabiting Polynesia as far eastwards as Samoa and Savage Island. Although one thousand miles of unbroken ocean divide the Seychelle Islands from the Chagos group (the nearest intermediate land to India), the Indian and Madagascar species (Pteropus medius and Pt. edwardsii) are very closely allied ; while, on the other hand, not a single species crosses the narrow channel between the Great Comoro Island and the African coast, although certainly two species (Pteropus edwardsii and Pt. livingstonii), and pro- bably a third (Pt. vulgaris), inhabit the Comoro group. The following table exhibits the very remarkable distribution of the species of this genus :— Number Regions Subregions of Species Remarks 1 Ethiopian... 2 African ......... None 4, Malagasy ......... 5 All these species very distinct. 1. Hindostan......... 1 Very closely allied to one of the . 27 Ceylon i 5...2 0... Malagasy species. a 3. Indo-China ...... 4 Three very closely allied. 4, Indo-Malaya...... 4 Three very closely allied. 1, Austro-Malaya... | 15 yy. Anat 2. Australia tpl ees 5 All the species very distinct. 3. Polynesia ......... 5 4. New Zealand...... None 163 ON THE GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE CHIROPTERA. TZ | OL | 02] T 66 |OOT| TZ | 68 ||/06 | Z¢/ 86 | 9 |1e6 | 88] Te | F |lze 92 | 96 | @ | GPISLI8a| @] 0 [POL | Sp POOL) 89 | COT) TE mp pe | | | | + eprorogsopdag — | ~~} ~~) — 196 |e |82Z | 9 | 00L] 2 | 9%) Lallts | IL] 02) T lige | oT 0G | T | —|— | — | —} * @pinuoyyeq way TZ | OL | 02 | T 68 |0G |OF | @ GL | ST | — | — 162 | 9s | — | — es | ee | — 1 — FF/IL|83| @ | ‘epraorysedse a eg mee em | cm fr 2s hc | mm oe FCO Ss ead coed gh pec ga ee be cg ee pitey04 Ny lee alee cell ke sles) 2 O0T,) 8 3) G84 <1 = Oes|~2eslaee5) =f =I gee| Ola Sel lnop se pe "2 eps eon te eel ee salen eae ol = O6s! TGs) ZO") pen o6 se EalsOr-| vo el OOle| Bie) ees) tel | ett oe eprpodo1e,q Som | sete eae || | | | _\| oO, | ——_—_ | | | | | | —_—_— ——— Oe | | | | | ae come | as Os |S ae | Seelop ll oo | Shy) aay ae Oo | Neen ges | ae eis.js{/Bia/S8iai8 © ee fo) Sj @ re | ee i i) Foe ce gz 2) | 4 <7 ® Lae co | co S| 3 Bis Bl @ = 2 B | Es 9 Bilea|sb | s B | & Blea liBisi ais S| |$| |$] |) 16) j€] 12] J4| Wel jel lel ie O1}OIBONT [eordorjoeNy UBITeIISNW [e}USIO ueidorqy ay OTpOIVR [VT ‘VUGLCOUIHY) AHL FO SHINGdgG ANY VHONH*L) HVITOOGG AHL Ao NOILAGIYISIG] ANY SUdd#NON GTHL ONIMOHS gta, 164 REPORT—1878. From the table (p. 162) it may be observed, that of the 39 species, 30 (or nearly 80 per cent.) inhabit the Malagasy subregion, and the Austra- lian region; and that more than 50 per cent. of the whole are found within the narrow limits of the Malagasy and Austro-Malayan subregions. It is worthy of notice, that of the nine species inhabiting the Oriental region, three only can be considered very distinct, and these are closely related to some of the species from the Malagasy and Austro- Malayan subregions, so that it appears evident that the species now inhabiting the Oriental region, were derived at a comparatively recent period from the above-named subregions. The sum of the foregoing remarks is well set forth in the second table (p. 163), which exhibits the number of peculiar genera and species of each and of all the families of Chiroptera in each zoological region, and also shows their percentage on the total number of the genera and species. This table also shows that among the Vespertilionide and Emballonuridex only, which are cosmopolitan in their distribution, does the percentage of peculiar species in each zoological region fall below 90, while even in these families it is rarely as low as 70. We may now proceed to consider to what extent the recognised zoo- logical regions are severally characterised by the possession of peculiar families, genera, or species of Chiroptera. In the first place, the two primary divisions of the earth, Palzogrea and Neogwa, are well characterised by their Chiropterous fauna: the former by the possession of three peculiar families, the Pteropodide, Rhinolophide, and Nycteride, and by the absence of the Phyllostomide ; the latter by the absence of the three first-named families, and by the presence of the latter. Although the Vespertilionide and Emballonuridse are common to both hemispheres, one species only is known with certainty to inhabit both the New and the Old World, and all the genera except three are peculiar. The remarkable poverty of the Nearctic and Palearctic regions in species, and especially in peculiar species, is well shown in the table. In the Nearctic region the number of peculiar species is but one-tenth of those which are characteristic of the closely connected Neotropical region; in the Palearctic, one-sixth of those in the Ethiopian, and one-seventh of those in the Oriental region. Moreover, the few species which appear to be peculiar to these two regions do not present such marked differences in structure from the species of the adjoining regions as the peculiar species of other regions; in other words, they are not so characteristically peculiar. This taken into consideration with the comparatively large percentage of non-peculiar species which are found in these and in the adjoining regions, and which extend as a rule into the southern parts only of these regions, shows that the Chiropterous fauna of the Nearctic and Palearctic regions is mainly, if not wholly, derivative. This is precisely what we should have expected theoretically ; for, know- ing that the greater part of the Nearctic and Palearctic regions was covered with ice at a comparatively recent period, and therefore uninhabitable by a class of animals few of which now extend even in summer as far as the limit of permanently frozen ground, we must suppose that on the cessa- tion of the glacial epoch, these regions derived their Chiropterous fauna from countries lying south of them. It appears evident, however, that the Nearctic region has derived many of its species from the Palearctic, probably by way of Bebring ON THE GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE CHIROPTERA. 165 Straits, at a time when more dry land existed in the northern parts of the Pacific Ocean. Although Vesperugo serotinus is the only species known with certainty to extend from the Palearctic to the Nearctic region, yet so close is the connection between many other Palearctic and Nearctic species (between Vespertilio mystacinus and V. nitidus, Vesperugo abramus and V. hesperus, Vesperugo borealis and V. propinquus, e.g.), that it is not necessary to require long separation to account for the few specific dif- ferences now noticeable. Of the eleven species which appear to be peculiar to the Palwarctic region, both the species of Rhinolophide are evidently very closely related to Ethiopian forms ; and the Vespertilionide, with the exception of Plecotus auritus, and Synotus barbastellus, are also represented by nearly allied forms in either the Ethiopian or Oriental regions. The Nearctic and Palearctic regions are therefore more characterised, so far as their Chiropterous fauna, by the absence rather than by the presence of peculiar genera and species. The remaining four regions, however, present a remarkable contrast in this respect. Each region appears to be as well characterised by its Chiroptera as by any other order of Mammalia. This is especially noticeable in the Neotropical region, which possesses a very remarkable family, the Phyllostomide, nowhere represented beyond its limits; also six peculiar genera of Emballonuride (amounting to 75 per cent. of the genera of that family); and two of Vespertilionide, making in all 39 genera peculiar to this region. The Ethiopian region (excluding Madagascar and its islands) is cha- racterised by that very remarkable genus of Pteropodide, Epomophorus, which stands so far apart from all other genera of this family; also by 71 species of other genera, of which more than 90 per cent. are peculiar. Madagascar and adjoining islands, included by Mr. Wallace under the name of the Malagasy subregion, although possessing some species (Phyllorhina commersonii, Nyctinomus acetabulosus, Taphozous mauritianus, Vesperugo minutus, e.g.) which are also found on the African continent, has other species representing a genus of which the remaining representa- tives are found in far distant continents. Thus, as I have remarked when treating of the distribution of the Pteropodide, the genus Pteropus is well represented in Madagascar and adjoining islands, and in the Oriental and Australian regions as far as the Navigator’s Islands, although not a single species extends into the continent of Africa. This genus includes by far the largest and most highly organised species of Chiro- ptera, which in number also amount to more than one-tenth of the whole order; and their remarkable distribution can only be accounted for by adopting the hypothesis of the existence at a comparatively recent date of a continent, or, more probably, of an archipelago of very closely con- nected islands, in the wide space of ocean now separating Madagascar from India and Australia. It is inconceivable that species to which a narrow channel of less than 200 miles suffices to act as an effectual barrier, could traverse thousands of miles of unbroken ocean in other directions. Even if we suppose that their presence in Africa is prevented by some cause unknown to us, still it is difficult to imagine species so slow in their flight as those of this genus crossing a channel of even half the width of that separating the Comoro Islands from the coast of Africa. But Pteropus medius of India is so closely related to Pt. edwardsii of Mada- 166 REPORT— 1878. gascar, that by many zoologists it would most probably be considered a variety only of the former species—a variety, it is quite conceivable, which might result from separation in a comparatively very short period. The Malagasy subregion also possesses four other species of Pteropus all very distinct from each other, having their nearest allies in the Aus- tralian region. One of these species, Pt. rodricensis, recently described by me, inhabits the small wind-swept island of Rodriguez, where its means of subsistence must now be very limited. It is difficult to account for the presence of such large and highly-organised species in these small islands, except on the supposition that the islands were not only much larger at some former time, but were also, as I have already remarked, closely connected with a chain of slightly separated islands, uniting them with the Indian and Australian continents. The Oriental region falls very slightly short of the Ethiopian in the percentage of its peculiar species, and slightly exceeds it in genera. Of 110 species eighty-eight are peculiar ; of these eight only are also found in the Ethiopian region, and they also extend into the Palearctic. The genera Cynopterus, Honycteris, Celops, and Cheiomeles are characteristic, but the latter three are each represented by a single species only. Of the remaining seventeen genera, two, Pteropus and Hmballonura, are also com- mon to the Malagasy subregion and to the Australian region, and ten are also found in the Oriental and Australian regions. With the exception of such cosmopolitan species as Miniopterus schreibersti and Vesperugo abramus, the Oriental species extending into the Australian region appear to inhabit only the adjacent parts of that region. The distinctiveness of the Oriental and Australian Chiropterous faunas is well shown by a collec- tion made lately in Duke of York Island and New Ireland, in which, out of twelve species, two only are also known from the Oriental region. The Australian region comes next to the Neotropical in the number of its peculiar genera; of the twenty-one known, six are peculiar, and of these four belong to the Pteropodide, being nearly half the whole number of the genera of that family. This region may therefore be considered the cradle of the Megachiroptera, although the total number of all species falls far short of either that of the Ethiopian or of the Oriental region, yet in the percentage of peculiar forms it holds an intermediate place. Two of the Australian subregions, the Austro-Malayan and the New Zealand, claim particular attention, the former for the great number of its species, the latter for the opposite reason. Of sixty-four Australian species, fifty-seven are peculiar, and of these nearly half appear to be limited to the Austro-Malayan subregion ; while two species only, of which one is peculiar, inhabit New Zealand. Great Britain, which nearly equals New Zealand in extent, has eight times the number of its species; and Madagascar, which is alone com- parable with it in peculiarity of fauna, exceeds it almost in the same proportion. The poverty of this subregion in species is, therefore, unequalled, and undoubtedly depends to a great extent, if not altogether, on the com- parative absence of insects, and probably especially of those species on which bats prey. The peculiar structure of Mystacina tuberculata* appears to indicate that this species seeks its food among the branches and leaves of trees on which Longicorn Coleoptera, which are most abundant among * See my paper on this species in P. Z. §., 1876, p. 486. ON RECENT IMPROVEMENTS IN THE PORT OF DUBLIN. 167 the New Zealand insects, feed. This remarkable species of Emballonurides constitutes a distinct group of that family, but has its nearest allies in the species of the group Molossi. Its fancied relationship to the Phyllostomide of the Neotropical region (as set forth by Mr. R. F. Tomes) is altogether illusory, as it depends only on the agreement between it and the species of that family in possessing a third phalanx in the index finger, which is related, as I have shown,* to the peculiar manner in which the wing is folded in repose, and occurs not only in this species, but also in some of the larger species of Molossi. A review of the above-stated facts shows :— 1. That the Chiroptera, though possessing exceptional powers of loco- motion, and therefore of dispersal, appear to be almost as strictly limited by certain barriers as other orders of Mammalia. 2. That while the geographical distribution of the families, genera, and species of this order on the whole adds further remarkable confirmation of the accuracy of the division of the earth into six zoological regions as defined by Mr. Sclater and subsequently adopted by Mr. Wallace, the peculiar distribution of the most highly organised and distinct, as well as of the largest genus, namely, Pteropus, adds additional strength to the views of those who, in consideration of the very peculiar nature of the fauna of Madagascar, feel disposed to form with it and the adjoining islands a seventh zoological region, to which Mr. Sclater’s name “ Lemuria”’ has been applied. On Recent Improvements in the Port of Dublin. By Bryvon B. Stoney, M.A., M.R.LA., M. Inst. CE., Engineer of the Dublin Port and Docks Board. [PuatTss I., IL, AND III.] [A communication ordered by the General Committee to be printed in extenso among the Reports. | Tur trade of few harbours in the United Kingdom has made greater relative progress within the last twenty years than that of Dublin. This, no doubt, is mainly due to the increased prosperity of the country as a whole, but it may also be attributed in great measure to the convergence of the main lines of internal traffic to Dublin, which has thus naturally become more and more the mart and emporium for a great portion of Treland. During this period of twenty years the tonnage entering the port has much more than doubled. In 1857 it amounted to 880,844 tons, and last year it rose to 1,973,781 tons, while during the current year there is a good promise that it will surpass the 2,000,000 hmit. For the sake of comparison I have placed in a tabular form the tonnage of Liver- pool and Glasgow, as well as those of the three principal ports in Ireland, for the three years preceding 1858 and 1878 respectively, so as to give fair averages of their respective rates of progress within the last twenty ears. q From this table it will be observed that while the tonnages of Liver- pool and Glasgow have respectively increased fifty per cent. in the last * PLZ Sy lee 168 REPORT—1878. twenty years, those of Belfast and Cork have nearly doubled, and that of Dublin has considerably more than doubled in the same time. Also, the tonnage of Glasgow is only one-fourth more and that of Liverpool is not four times greater than that of Dublin. Liverpool (including | Glasgow | Dublin | Belfast Cork * Birkenhead) Tons Tons Tons Tons Tons 1855 4,096,160 1,666,518 882,719 744,364 328,658 1856 4,320,618 1,673,096 904,903 772,127 347,126 1857 4,645,362 1,612,681 880,844 796,968 384,167 Average of preced- || 4 354,947 | 1,650,765| 889,488 | 771,153 | 353,317 ing 3 years if 1875 6,588,731 2,249,857 | 1,677,543 | 1,434,754 623,463 1876 6,805,970 2,298,076 | 1,879,886 | 1,497,585 740,558 1877 7,000,726 2,428,616 | 1,973,781 | 1,566,752 740,201 Average of preced- ing 3 years 6,798,476 | 2,325,516/1,843,737|1,499,697 | 701,407 The increase in the tonnage of the Port of Dublin is not confined to one class of vessel alone; for we find that while the coasting trade increased from 821,640 tons to 1,543,861 tons, or nearly doubled in the last twenty years, the oversea trade increased from 67,848 tons to 299,876 tons, or more than quadrupled in the same period. Previous to 1865 the shipping quays of Dublin were, with the exception of a short length opposite the Custom House, founded at or close to low water level, and when the tide was out the foreshore used to strip ont a lon way in front of the walls. .To meet the demand for a greater depth than this, timber jetties had been from time to time constructed along portions of the North Wall, so as to give about 8 feet at low water in line of keel; and for many years this expedient was found to answer for the cross- channel steam trade and for a few of the smaller oversea vessels, while the larger vessels of the latter class either discharged in Kingstown Harbour, or in a small excavation called Halpin’s Pool, which had been dredged in the open harbour beyond the end of the North Wall. The first real attempt at providing deep water quays was commenced in 1864 by rebuilding nearly 700 feet in length of the east end of the North Wall quay, so as to allow vessels drawing 17 feet to lie afloat alongside at low water; but the most important improvements of this kind were not commenced till 1870, since which date 6500 feet of quay have either been rebuilt or constructed where no quays existed before, so as to give depths of from 15 to 24 feet at low water, and enable the cross-channel steamers to sail at fixed hours independently of the tide, as well as allow the larger class of oversea vessels which now frequent the port to lie always afloat. It will be observed that the rebuilding of the former quay walls at a greater depth did not add to their length, though it enabled rather more vessels than formerly to be accommodated in a given length of wall, and the extending commerce of the port rendered it necessary to provide additional deep water accommodation to suit the oversea trade, which, as already observed, has increased more than four- * The tonnage of Cork Harbour is exclusive of vessels calling for orders, mails, or passengers, and not loading or unloading cargo. LONGITUDINAL SEGTION OF FLOATING SHEARS SHOWING ARRANGEMENT OF MACHINERY anaeyssantal | Musteating MU" BOB. Stoneys Paper on Recent tmprovenents in the Port of Dublin. ——— END ELEVATION oF FLOATING SHEARS i} \__ hil Hi TTT mii’ Spatiproole &Calith London 48% Report Brit. Assoc. 1878. Plate I. YY O——————©) Vey CROSS SECTION oF WHARF & FACE oF DCK. swoode & Co. Lith. London. Mus trating MY B. IVUUDUUVODIDEODESEINTUEODEORDITEET EEE CROSS SECTION of WHARF & Face oF BLocK FROKT ELEVATION of WHARF & CROSS SECTION oF BLOCK Spocimevede Gs Lith Leelee TWustrating M? B. B. Stone's Paper on Recent Improvenaents te the Port of Dublin 48% Report Brit. Assoc. 1878. <\ AT TT tt NET TT ——— Lor Illustra ting DivinG BELL and BARGE LONGITUDINAL SECTION. END ELEVATION | spouirveede Oa ish Landon, | Mustrating M° BB. Stoneyis Paper un Recent Improvements wm the Port of Dublin . ON RECENT IMPROVEMENTS IN THE PORT OF DUBLIN. 169 fold in the space of twenty years. Accordingly it was determined, after mature consideration, to extend the North Wall, and construct a large tidal basin with 24 feet at low water inside and 22 feet along the river face, so as to float the largest commercial vessels at all states of tides. The masonry was commenced in 1871, and up to the present about 2500 lineal feet of wall have been built on a novel principle which avoids the trouble and expense of cofferdams, pumping, staging and other tem- porary works, the expenditure on which frequently exceeds the cost of the permanent work to which they are merely ancillary. The new mode of construction consists in the use of blocks of masonry of unprecedented size in the foundations below low water level, as represented in the diagrams which accompany this paper. Hach block is 29 feet high, 113 feet long, and 21 feet 4 inches broad at the base, and weighs 350 tons ; they are built on land on a block wharf (Plate II.), and about three months after completion they are lifted by a powerful floating shears (Plate I.), and conveyed to their destination in the quay where each block forms 114 feet in length of the lower portion of the wall as far as low water level, and when a number of these blocks have been thus laid in position the superstructure up to the coping level is built over them in the usual manner by tidal work, the total height of the wall being 45 feet. Besides the large floating shears for lifting and moving the blocks about, there is one other special appliance—namely, a diving bell (Plate III.), also of unprecedented size and peculiar in construction. This bell, which weighs 80 tons, is used for excavating and levelling the river bed on which the blocks lie. The chamber is cast-iron, 20 feet ‘Square and 64 feet high, with a tube or funnel 3 feet in diameter, and rising to a height of 44 feet over the bottom of the bell; and this is the greatest depth of water for which the present bell is intended, though by adding to the length of the funnel it might be worked in greater depths. The upper end of the funnel forms an air lock 64 feet high, with double doors and suitable cocks for admitting the com- pressed air from the chamber into the lock, or for letting that in the lock escape into the external atmosphere, and by this arrangement the workmen can pass up and down without lifting the bell off the bottom or stopping the work of excavation. Inside the chamber are two large iron trays, and the men shovel the excavated earth into these trays. When they are filled the bell is lifted a few feet off the ground, and the barge hauled some yards to the rear of the wall where the trays are dis- charged, by pulling out a detent, and the barge is then brought back to its working position, and the bell lowered as before. _ The operation of lifting and setting a block is as follows :—The float- ing shears is brought bow-on to the block wharf during flood tide, and the lifting chains are attached to iron suspending bars which pass through each block. The chains are then hauled in by the winches on board, and water is pumped into a large tank at the after-end of the _ vessel to counterbalance the weight of the block, which is then floated away to its destination and lowered into place the following low water, so that at one step 114 feet forward of wall are built up to low water level. The cost of both floating shears and diving bell was under 25,000/., and the whole of this was repaid in the first 600 feet of wall by the ‘superior economy of this system over ordinary cofferdam and pumping work, and the relative saving now amounts to about 16,0001. per annum. It would obviously be useless to construct deep water quays if the 170 REPORT—1 878. river channel and bar were not also deepened to correspond. Sixty years since the depth of water on Dublin bar was about 6 feet; indeed, there was, a few years ago, an old man in the harbour employment who had in his youth stood on the bar at a good low water. At this time the North Bull Wall did not exist, and the bar, consisting of hard sand, extended in a curved direction about half a mile east of Poolbeg Light- house. As soon, however, as the Bull Wall was built, the large volume of water flowing and ebbing over the 2500 acres which were enclosed between it and the Pigeon House Wall, was confined in direction and augmented in velocity, so that it impinged against the bar and scoured it away to its present depth of about 16 feet at low water, giving a depth of 28 feet at high water springs, and this is still gradually improving ; for 20 years since there was 3 feet less than at present, and it is believed that there is no other instance on record of a bar being so successfully deepened by artificial means. The depth in the river channel has recently made great progress, corresponding to the other improvements in the port. The average tonnage dredged in each of the ten years preceding 1860 did not reach 150,000 tons, and it is now close on a million tons per annum. The greater portion of this dredged material is now conveyed to sea in very large hopper barges, each of which carries 850 to 1000 tons, according to the state of the weather, to a distance of 8 miles from Dublin, or about 2 miles beyond the Bailey Lighthouse, where it is deposited in deep water beyond the influence of tides within the bay. Very great economy has resulted from this system of large hopper barges as compared with the older methods; for, multiplying the present tonnage dredged by the saving per ton, the gross saving amounts to considerably over 40,0007. per annum. Indeed, without this economy it would have been impossible to carry out the other improve- ments in the port; for Dublin, though one of the larger ports in the kingdom, has relatively the smallest income, as there are no dues on goods except some small ones on timber, bricks and marble, which in the aggregate do not reach 2000/. annually. This will appear at a glance from the following table, which gives the revenue derived by the ports already mentioned from tonnage dues and dues on goods for the year 1877, and also the income which each ton yields the several ports as well as their respective debts. F Income Port Bares, art Total Besiies per Ton ates oods onnage Register £ £ £ Tons Pence £ Liverpool ...........- 377,612 | 599,024 | 976,636 | 7,000,726 | 33°5 {15,249,290 Glasgow ..........0002. 45,253 | 123,147 | 168,400 | 2,428,616 | 16°64 | 3,211,383 Dobliny ost. .ceesee ne see 58,451 1,799 | 60,250 | 1,973,781 7°32 330,734 Belfast fe.csssessrs ier 41,275 | 37,630 | 78,905 | 1,566,752 | L2-% 716,708 Cork Pa. tereceeeete: 13,432 | 18,306 | 31,738 740,201 | 10:3 103,885 The rates on goods for Liverpool include the so-called ‘‘ Town dues ” on goods, amounting to 263,3291.; but as these were purchased by the Mersey Docks and Harbour Board from the Corporation of Liverpool in 1857 for their then estimated value of a million and a half sterling, they now form a very valuable portion of the port revenues. ON RECENT IMPROVEMENTS IN THE PORT OF DUBLIN. Wt The tonnage rates for Cork include 37911. derived from one half- penny per ton levied on vessels using or entering the harbour as a port of call, but not loading or unloading cargo therein. It represents a tonnage of 1,819,860 tons, and is quite distinct from the 740,201 tons which represents vessels loading or unloading cargo ; but, as it is avail- able for port purposes, it is included in the tonnage rates of Cork harbour, in the second column above. If this were omitted, the income would be reduced to 9d. per ton register. This table shows that for every ton entering their respective ports, Liverpool receives more than four and a half times and Glasgow more than twice the revenue that Dublin gets, while Belfast gets two-thirds more, and Cork nearly fifty per cent. more. The floating shears and diving bell are useful for many other purposes besides building quay walls. Among others they are well adapted for breakwater construction and laying the foundations of beacons and light- honses in suitable localities. There is at present a lighthouse in process of construction at the extremity of the Bull Wall which forms the north side of the entrance to Dublin Harbour, the foundations of which in such an exposed place would have been very costly if built by any of the ordi- nary methods. The base is formed of two large semicircular blocks, each sixteen feet high, and together forming a circle of thirty feet in diameter and weighing nearly 700 tons. These blocks were built on the block wharf and conveyed about three miles down the harbour, where they were laid at a depth of several feet below equinoctial low waters on the rubble stone forming the extremity of the Bull Wall which had been previously excavated by the diving bell. On top of these blocks is built in heavy granite ashlar with solid rubble hearting the lower part, or what may be called the plinth of the tower, rising some feet over high water, and on top of this again the shaft of the tower is in process of construc- tion, formed of wrought iron lined with timber, ‘the total height from foundation to top of lantern being 79 feet. Opposite this lighthouse, and at the south side of the harbour entrance, stands Poolbeg Lighthouse, erected in the last century at the extremity of the pier beyond the Pigeon ‘House Fort. The foundations of this latter lighthouse were laid at about low water level in the centre of a mound of rubble stone, and it was originally surrounded by a handsome cut stone platform, which was heavy enough to stand ordinary rough weather, but which, with the rubble stone on which it was laid, was constantly washed away by heavy storms from the sea front of the lighthouse, leaving the base of the latter exposed and liable to be undermined, and causing heavy annual expense from hauling the rubble back again, to be again scattered in the next gale. The light- house base and foreshore are now protected by large blocks weighing 140 tons each, two of which were carried at a trip by the floating shears and dropped on the irregular foreshore in front of the lighthouse, which they now protect from the violence of the sea which breaks on them before reaching the lighthouse. This work was exposed to the full brunt of the, great storm of January 3rd, 1877, which nearly cut across the east pier of Howth Harbour and did considerable damage to the paved slope of ‘Kingstown West Pier, and to the railways both at Monkstown and at Howth, which, strange to say, were apparently completely covered by their respective piers. The big blocks, however, protected the base of Poolbeg Lighthouse, and no damage whatever occurred to it. Besides excavating, the diving bell has been used for removing portions of wreck 172 REPORT—1 878. and pulling up pile stumps in deep water, in which latter operation it is very successful, and three or four pile stumps can be drawn at one effort by attaching chains hanging from the ceiling of the bell chamber to the heads of the piles, and then raising the pile by its hoisting chains, which have a surplus working strength of about seventy tons when the bell is under water. Report of the Committee, consisting of Professor Cavey, F.R.S., Professor G. G. Stoxss, F.R.S., Professor H. J. S. Smrra, F.R.S., Professor Sir Wiiu1am Txomson, F.R.S., Mr. James GLAISHER, F.RS., and Mr. J. W. L. Guatsuer, F.R.S. (Secretary), on Ma- thematical Tables. [PLATE IV.] Account of the Calculation of the Factor Table for the Fourth Million. A pEscripTion of the different factor tables that have been .published is given in the British Association Report, 1873, pp. 34-40; and a more complete historical account of factor tables, especially of Felkel’s and the manuscript tables of the last century is contained in the ‘ Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society,’ vol. iii. part iv. pp. 99-138, 1878. Itis only necessary, therefore, to give a brief notice of the extensive tables that have been published during the present century, and which it is the object of the Committee to complete. These tables are :-— : (1). Chernac’s Oribrum Arithmeticwm, which gives all factors of all numbers not divisible by 2, 3, or 5 from 1 to 1,000,000. (2). Burckhardt’s Table des Divisewrs, which gives the least factor of all numbers not divisible by 2, 3, or 5 from 1 to 3,036,000. (3). Dase’s Factoren Tafeln, which give the least factor of all num- bers not divisible by 2, 38, or 5 from 6,000,000 to 9,000,000. The reason of the gap between 3,036,000 and 6,000,000 is as follows: —Burckhardt completed the publication of his three millions in 1817, and some time previous so 1849 Crelle presented to the Berlin Academy the manuscript of the factor tables for the fourth, fifth, and sixth millions. IT 1850 Gauss urged Dase to calculate factor tables for the seventh, eighth, ninth, and tenth millions, as the three intermediate millions were in the possession of the Berlin Academy, and he did not doubt that sooner or later they would be published. In 1860, through the support of friends in his native town, Hamburg, Dase, who was distinguished for his ability in calculation, was enabled to devote him- self wholly to the carrying out of Gauss’s project. On September llth, 1861, he died suddenly, leaving the seventh million complete and the eighth million nearly complete; he had also determined a great number of the factors for the ninth and tenth millions. Dr. Rosen- berg, of Hamburg, undertook the continuation of the work, and the seventh million was published at Hamburg in 1862, the eighth in 1863, and the ninth in 1865. In the preface to the ninth million it is stated that the tenth million was near completion. There was thus left “uopto'T waTy 09 y epoomsmodg A (I mle PT (000 = See th — | ak Pe | V ae 1 i 00 <5 I mn | == i iC VT a1 rn — | | [ aaa f b VF | hk ULOTT EL UP ATT OPN ae O10 aL RE) ea le eee ‘Al 94? 1d | i a IIIT [4 iia a poe el pes) ey HA ea ah eS (aS ee a a) ha g ee | | 2 a Am Ls 0 a4 (I —) i a Ss a Mme | | ae S| beam ee ee ee (A VT 4+ HT 00 [+—4+}+$ b | mee (AU mnt as [0 L renee lee el SS - eaisliee [2 Ei «0 apou ayy burnysmyp unasbory ‘BLE 0ssy qu” ).10dAYT 14 BF MOOT ‘AIT epocuncrods Li PD gy 40} wravag ryT AON YMA MY wy Nyny anony mp yours yo wpou wy) Burmayenyp unatouy Al Pid LBL 208TY T KaNtrNT aoe ON MATHEMATICAL TABLES. 173 a gap of three millions between the third and seventh millions, which it was very desirable to fill up not only for the sake of completing the table up to nine millions, but also in order to render more useful the millions already published. Accordingly, Professor Cayley, the chair- man of the Committee, wrote to Professor Kummer, the secretary of the Mathematical Section of the Berlin Academy, asking if there were any chance of the publication of the manuscript ; and Professor Kummer, in a letter dated April 29th, 1877, replied that it had been examined on a former occasion, and found to be so inaccurate that “the Academy was convinced that the publication would never be advisable.’ The calcula- tion was then at once commenced by Mr. James Glaisher, with the assis- tance of two computers, and has been continued without interruption since. The fourth million is completed and ready for press, and some. progress has been made with the fifth and sixth millions, which are being calcu- lated together, and which will be completed, it is believed, by the meeting of the Association at Sheffield. The tenth million has not been published. It remained in the possession of the widow of Dr. Rosenberg till the early part of the present year, when it was presented by her to the Berlin Academy. The method employed in the calculation of the fourth million, and by which the fifth and sixth millions are being calculated, is practically the same as that which was invented by Burckhardt, and was adopted by Dase. As the method is a very remarkable one, and as no description of it (with the exception of a brief notice by Burckhardt himself) has been published, the following account of it is given here :— A form was lithographed (Plate IV.), having 78 vertical lines and 81 horizontal lines (besides several other lines used for headings, &c.) ; it is thus divided into 77 x 80 oblong spaces which may for convenience be called squares. The eighty rows are numbered, at the extreme left of the sheet, 01,07...97; 01,03...99 ; 03,09,...99; there being two white spaces separating the hundreds. This is the same as in Burckhardt’s or Dase’s tables, each column representing 300 numbers. The advantage of having 77 columns is that the 7’s and 11’s are lithographed on the form and have not to be determined and inserted by hand. Thus if 77 consecutive columns of Burckhardt’s tables be taken, and all the headings and tabular results except 7’s and 11’s be supposed to be removed, we havea representation of the form. The form actually used was constructed to begin from 3,000,000, so that for the exact representation of it we are to commence with the column headed 201 on p. 3 of Burckhardt’s table (7.e., the 68th column). Since each sheet corresponds to 77 x 300 numbers, a million occupies about 43,5 sheets, and as on each sheet the number of 7’s lithographed is 880, and the number of 11’s is 480, it follows that, by adopting a form which permits the 7’s and 11’s to be lithographed, about 59,000 entries are saved in each million ; and, what is even more important, the accuracy of these 59,000 tabular results is assured. The squares to which the least factor 13 belongs were obtained as fol- lows: Find the numbers between 3,000,000 and 3,000,000 + 13 x 300, which are divisible by 13, but not by 2, 3, or 5. Take 13 consecutive columns of any blank form and cut them off from the rest of the form ; then, supposing the first column to correspond to the column headed 3,000,000, makea mark in the squares that correspond to the multiples of 18, previously found, and cut out the squares so marked. We thus have a group of 13 columns, from which a number of squares (80) have been 174 REPORT—1878. removed, and which may be called a screen or sieve. Place the sieve over the first 13 columns of the first sheet of the fourth million; then either empty squares or squares containing a 7 or 11 will appear through the holes of the sieve; in each empty square write the number 13. Then place the sieve over the next 13 columns and proceed as before, and so on throughout the whole 44 sheets. The sieve for the next prime, 17, contains 17 columns, and is made in the same way, viz., by cutting out the squares corresponding to the num- bers between 3,000,000 and 3,000,000 + 17 x 300, which are divisible by 17, and not by 2,3, or 5. Then this sieve is placed over the first 17 columns, and 17 entered in all the empty squares, then placed over the next 17, &c., and so on. The sieves for 13 and 17 are drawn in the plate (Plate IV.), the shaded squares being those that are cut out. The 13-sieve is formed of the first thirteen columns of one of the sheets, and the margin, con- taining the figures 01,07,..., is retained in order to show the arrangement of the form, which contains 77 columns. Of course in using the sieve this margin is cut off as in the 17-sieve. The 13-sieve shows the num- bers between 3,000,000 and 3,000,000 + 13 x 300 which have least factors 7,11, or 18; thus, for example, from the third column we see that 3,000,613 3,000,739 3,000,823 3,000,641 3,000,767 3,000,851 3,000,683 3,000,781 3,000,893 3,000,697 3,000,809 have 7 as their least factor; that 3,000,679 3,000,811 3,000,877 3,000,701 3,000,833 3,000,899 have 11 as their least factor, and that 3,000,647 3,000,751 3,000,829 3,000,673 3,000,803 3,000,881 have 13 as their least factor. Of course the numbers such as 3,000,179, for which 7 appears in a shaded square, have 7 as their least factor, and are also divisible by 13; and similarly, when 11 appears in a shaded square, the number has 11 for its least factor and is also divisible by 13. The 80 argument numbers 01, 07,...97; 01, 03,...99; 03, 09,...99 cor- respond to the 80 numbers 1, 7,...97; 101, 103,...199; 203, 209,...299 that remain when the numbers divisible by 2, 3, or 5 are thrown out from the 300 numbers 1, 2, 3, 4,...300. The numbers 01, 03... at the side are lithographed on the form, but the headings of the columns of course are different for each sheet and are written in. Each page in the printed table contains 30 columns, and one advantage of this method of construc- tion-is that the original sheets, when completed, are sent to the printer as they stand, so that there is no copying required. The actual size of the form employed is 31°69 inches in length and 16:20 inches in width, exclusive of the argument numbers at the left. A somewhat smaller form would have sufficed, but this gives ample space in each square for four figures, and was not found to be inconveniently large in use. The squares in the sieves were cut out bya punch made for the purpose. The sieves drawn in the plate have been reduced to suit the size of the page of this volume. The sieves were formed thus: Take for example 13; the first uneven ON MATHEMATICAL TABLES. 175 multiple of 13 exceeding 3,000,000 is 3,000,023 : add 26 continually till 3,000,000 + 13 x 300 is reached, and then throw out the multiples of 3 and 5; there are thus left 80 numbers, which correspond to the squares to be cut out from the sieve. The accuracy of the 80 numbers that remain was verified by differencing them; as the differences recur with a period of eight.* In general the sieve for the prime p contains p columns, and it is to be noted that every sieve, whatever its length, has exactly 80 squares cut out, onein each line. To show that there must be one square cut out in each line it is only necessary to observe that p must have some multiple, not divisible by 2, 3, or 5, of the form 300 g + a, where ais any one of the 80 numbers less than 300 and prime to it. For, by a known theorem, if p be prime to 7, and if p, 2p, 3p,...(r—1) p be divided by r, the remainders are the r—1, numbers 1, 2, 3,...,.—1; in this case, therefore, if p, 2p, 3p, ...299p be divided by 300, the remainders are the 299 numbers 1, 2, 3,... 299, and if 2p, 3p, 4p,... and all the multiples of p divisible by 2, 3, or 5 be thrown out, the remainders divisible by 2, 3, or 5 are thrown out also,and the remainders left are the 80 numbers lessthan 300 and prime to it. Also, there cannot be two squares in the same line cut out from the sieve, fora being a given number, if 300g+a be divisible by p, the next number in the same line divisible by p is 300gp+a, viz.,is a number p columns fur- ther on. The cube root of 4,000,000 is 158°74..., and in a factor table extend- ing to 4,000,000, the prime 157 appears once, and only once, as the least factor of a three-factor number, viz., for 3,869,893. Thus 163 and larger primes will only occur as least factors of two-factor numbers, and we may find the numbers to which they belong without the use of the sieves as follows :— Supposing that we are constructing a factor table from the commence- ment, the least factor 163 first appears at the number 163 x 163, then at 167 x 163, 173 x 163, 179 x 163, 181 x 163, &e. ; 163, 167, 173, 179, 181, &c., being the series of primes starting from 163; for we only consider products of two primes, of which 163 is the smaller, that is, numbers formed by multiplying 163 by the primes greater than itself. To obtain the results of the multiplications it is only necessary to add to 163 x 163 the product 4 x 163, and to this 6 x 163, &e.; the work standing thus— 26,569 = 163 x 163 652= 4x 163 27,221 = 167 x 163 978 = 6x 163 28,199 = 173 x 163 978'=" -6°x 163 29,177 =179 x 163 326= 2x 163 29,503 = 181 x 163 &e. &e. * It is easily seen that this must be so; for form the multiples of the prime p that are not divisible by 2, 3, or 5; these are p, 7p, llp, 13p, 17p, 19p, 23p, 29p, then the next eight are obtained by adding 30p to each of these and so on. Thus the differences are 6p, 4p, 2p, 4p, 2p, 4p, 6p, 2p, recurring with a period of eight. 176 REPORT—1878. This process will give all the numbers to which 163 belongs as least factor up to (163)? = 4,330,747, where the three-factor numbers commence. All that is required in order to reduce this to mere addition is a list of differences of consecutive primes from 163 to +451, 1 being the limit of the table, supposed less than 4,330,747, and a small table of even multiples of 163 from 2 x 163 to 2m x 163, 2m being the greatest difference between two consecutive primes between these limits. If 7 be 4,000,000, the nearest rime below +1451 is 24,533; and the greatest difference is 52, between 19,609 and 19,661.* The accuracy of the work can be verified at any stage and as often as thought necessary by multiplying together the two factors. Of course in the calculation of the fourth million the commence- ment would be made at 18,413 x 163= 3,001,319, the smallest number exceeding 3,000,000 to which the least factor 163 belongs. There are thus two distinct methods, each of which has its special advantages, viz., the sieve method and the method by calculation of multi- ples. The latter is unsuitable for small primes, which appear as least factors of numbers having three or more prime factors; in fact, this method is only appropriate for two-factor numbers. On the other hand, the sieve method is rather more suitable for the entry of small primes, as, when the prime is large, the great size of the sieve is inconvenient; this method, however, points out all multiples of the prime, not divisible by 2, 3, or 5, whether they be two-factor, three-factor, four-factor, &., numbers. It is clear that up to 163 the sieve method should be used ; and that for 163 and beyond we may employ the multiple method. Burckhardt states that he used sieves for primes up to 500, and the multiple method for higher primes. In the calculation of the fourth million sieves were used for primes up to and including 307, and the multiple method was employed: for primes from 211 to 1999. The numbers corresponding to the least factors from 211 to 307 inclusive were obtained by both methods. As the multiple method only gives numbers where the least factor is the given prime p, it follows that every number so found must correspond to an empty square, and the verification thus afforded of the entries already made was very valuable. The sieve for 307 contains 307 columns, and therefore occupies four: sheets all but one column: considered as a whole, therefore, it has only to be moved 11 times for the million, while the sieve for 13 has to be moved 257 times.f Before the calculation was begun, it seemed as if the excessive length * The greatest difference between two consecutive primes up to 100,000 is 72 (31,397—31,469). For a list of the differences that exceed 50 and other allied’ tables, see ‘ Messenger of Mathematics,’ vol. vii. pp. 174-175 (March, 1878). + In the fourth million the 13’s were entered by a sieve consisting of 13 columns, the 17's by a sieve of 17 columns, and soon. In the fifth and sixth millions now in progress, the 13’s were entered by a sieve of 78 columns, equivalent to six 13-sieves fixed together. This was found to greatly facilitate the entries, as the number of removals of the sieve was reduced in the proportion of 6 to 1, and there was less risk of error. The saving of time effected by the use of the 78-column sieve amounted to nearly one-half. For the 17’s a sieve of 5 x 17, = 85, columns was used, for the 19’s a sieve of 4 x 19, = 76, columns, and so on, the number of columns being made as nearly as possible equal to the number of columns (77) on a sheet. It was found also that by the use of the long sieves the sheets were much better preserved from wear and tear, as the sheet upon which the factors were being entered was in general almost wholly covered by the sieve, and so protected from friction, &e. - ON MATHEMATICAL TABLES. 177 of the sieves (the 307-sieve is 10 feet 6 inches in length, and the 499-sieve 17 feet 1 inch) is productive of great inconvenience, and would also necessitate very great accuracy and care in the lithographing and printing of the sheets, so that the squares should correspond exactly, over so great a distance; and it seemed surprising that Burckhardt should have continued the sieve method so far. But this was on the supposition that the portions of the sieve would be all fixed together, so that it would consist of one long sheet. Experience, however, soon showed that nothing was gained by fixing the sheets together, and in fact that it was a positive inconvenience to do so. The sheets forming the sieve were numbered 1, 2, 3, &c., and all that was requisite was to use sheet 1 first, then sheet 2, then sheet 3, then sheet 1 again (if the sieve consisted of only 3 sheets), and so on ; in fact, the long sieves were found to be quite as easy to use as the smaller ones. Above 307, however, it seemed to be scarcely worth while to construct the sieves, as so little use was made of them, and as the eae method was preferable in consequence of the verification afforded yit. » The mode of work was as follows: The entries were made by the sieves, and one multiple of p obtained from each position of the p-sieve was divided out by p, in order to verify that the sieve was always rightly placed ; this verification was employed for each position of every sieve. The numbers were then examined by Mr. Glaisher himself by the sieves. They were then examined a third time by the sieves, and every number ticked. The least factors obtained by the multiple method were read out and entered on the sheets; and they were subsequently read out again in a different manner and ticked. Any numbers found unticked were after- wards specially examined. The proofs of the table when printed will be read with the original calculations of numbers by the multiple method. On the whole the method of construction is a very perfect one. It has been explained in some detail, because Burckhardt contents himself with a very brief sketch occupying only two paragraphs; and the process is sufficiently interesting to deserve a more complete account. Hach sieve, as stated, has 80 squares cut out, one in each line; though of course, as there are only 80 squares cut out, whatever be the length of the sieve, many of the columns on the longer sieves are left intact. The patterns formed by the holes in the sieves were very curious, some being very regular, while in others the holes were very scattered, and no two were much alike. The sieves for 149 and 151 were remarkable, the holes running steadily up in the one case and steadily down in the other.* The reason for this is that these numbers are nearly equal to the half of 300, the difference between two adjacent squares in the same line, so that numbers distant from one another by even multiples of 150 are in the same line. For a similar reason the holes in the sieves for 59 and 61, and 29 and 31, show a steady ascent and descent. When the sieve for 23 is laid in its proper position on any one of the sheets a slightly ascending row of 13’s (including some 7’s and 11’s) is seen through the holes ; this is connected with the fact that 13 x 28=299, and differs from 300 by 1 only. Similarly, when the 43-sieve is laid on the sheets a slightly de- scending row of 7’s is seen, as 7 x 43=301, and other instances of the same kind were remarked. It may be observed that when the pattern * Several of the sieves, including those for 149 and 151, were exhibited to the Section at the Meeting at Dublin. 1878. N 178 REPORT—1878, was regular (as in the case of the 13-sieve and 17-sieve, where the holes slope down in parallel lines) the entry of the factors was much facilitated. Great care was always required in order to be certain that no factor had escaped entry ; but this examination was much more rapidly performed when the pattern was fairly regular. The size of the volume would, however, be increased very greatly if all the factors were given, without any propor- tionate advantage. Burckhardt’s arrangement of the table is an admirable piece of condensation,'as the least factors of 9,000 numbers are given, in the space of half a square foot, on each page. It will be evident from this description that it would be just as easy to enter all prime factors in the table as to enter only the least; and if all the prime factors were entered the verification would be easier, and in the numbers entered by the multiple method no error could occur, unless the same mistake were made independently in entering both factors. The methods described in this section are no doubt practically iden- tical with those employed by Burckhardt, and the calculation of the million suggested no improvements upon them, except in a few matters of detail. The construction of the table, though very simple in theory, required such continual care at every step, and such constant supervision, that it could not be undertaken by any one who was not prepared to devote a great portion of his time to the work. ; Eleventh Report of the Committee, consisting of Professor EVERETT, Professor Sir Wix~1am Txomson, Professor J. CLERK MAXWELL, Mr. G. J. Symons, Professor Ramsay, Professor Gurkiz, Mr. J. GuaisHeR, Mr. Prneetty, Professor Epwarp Hou, Professor Anstep, Dr. CLrement Lr Neve Foster, Professor A. S. HerscHEL, Mr. G. A. Lzsour, Mr. A. B. Wrynnz, Mr. Gattoway, and Mr. JosEPH DICKINSON, appointed for the purpose of investigating the Rate of Increase of Underground Temperature downwards in various Localities of Dry Land and under Water. Drawn up by Professor Everett (Secretary). Dr. Sraprr has continued his observations of the temperature in the St. Gothard Tunnel, and has contributed to the Swiss Natural History Society a paper* of 56 quarto pages, embodying the results. . The following is his description (pp. 26, 27) of the mode of observing the temperature of the rocks in the tunnel :— “The exact determination of the temperature of the rocks in the tun- nel formerly occasioned a notable expenditure of time and money. At first thermometers about a metre long (made by J. Goldschmid, of Zurich) were employed for this purpose ; their tubes being cemented into a wooden cylinder, so that only the bulb (surrounded by a perforated steel cap) projected below, and the scale (extending from 15° to 30° C.) above. Tallow was poured round the wooden cylinder, and the whole thermo- meter was then thrust into a bore-hole a metre deep, so that only the * «Studien tiber die Wirmevertheilung im Gotthard,’ i. Theil. ‘Der Schwei- zerischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft zu ihrer sechzigsten Jahresversammlung in Bex gewidmet,’ von F. M, Stapfi. Bern, 1877. ON THE RATE OF INCREASE OF UNDERGROUND TEMPERATURE. 179 scale projected, from which readings were taken from time to time until the temperature became constant. The final reading had to be corrected not only for rise of zero but also for the temperature of the quicksilver in the thermometer tube which extends from the opening to the bottom of the bore-hole. Another very notable correction was required for the more or less oblique position of the thermometer; for the hydrostatic pressure of the quicksilver presses out the glass bulb so far that without change of temperature the long thermometer reads from 0°4 to 1°-0 less in the vertical than in the horizontal position. “After about from three to ten days, the reading of a thermometer luted into a bore-hole ceased to alter. “‘ Separate trials with thermometers of similar construction, but different length, showed moreover that, after months, the temperature of the rock at about a metre deep was still unchanged. This is obviously owing to the small difference of temperature between the rock and the surrounding air. “From the observations at No. 8 and No. 15, in Table IIL, it is seen that the temperature at the bottom of the bore-hole was sometimes a little lower and sometimes a little higher than nearer its mouth. ' “This mode of observing gave correct results, but was laborious and costly, not only on account of the necessity of making special bore-holes for the purpose, but because almost every experiment cost a thermometer. The projecting end was often maliciously broken off, and on account of the swelling of the wooden case it almost never happened that at the end of an experiment a thermometer was drawn out again uninjured. “ Hermann and Pfister remedied this latter evil by surrounding the thermometer tube, from the bulb to the scale, with a glass case, and this with a steel jacket. This arrangement, however, involves not only con- duction through the steel, but also continual interchange of heat by currents of air in the glass case, from the mouth to the bottom of the hole. For these reasons the observations made with these thermometers could not be employed ‘without intricate corrections. “Later I tried a Thomson’s maximum thermometer,* kindly placed at my disposal by Professor Everett, which (after previous strong cooling) was left for several days at the bottom of the bore-hole, closed air-tight. The results agreed with those obtained by other methods; but who can guarantee that the higher temperature prevailing in a newly-bored hole is always just so much depressed by the cold mass of the thermometer and its copper case, that the rock temperature alone determines the final indication of the maximum thermometer. “This consideration induced me to employ for rock-temperature observations (and they also serve for air and water observations) the above-mentioned short thermometers with insulated bulbs, the first of which Professor Everett caused to be made by Negretti and Zambra for this express purpose. These thermometers, enclosed in a metal box provided with a handle, are thrust to the bottom of the bore-hole, which is at least a metre deep. To the handle is fastened a strong cord reach- ing to the mouth of the hole, by which it can be drawn out again at the end of the trial. The bore-hole, from the thermometer to the month, is stopped with greased rag or other similar material, as_air- tight as possible. After two or three days, the thermometers have * It was one of the protected Negretti maximum thermometers constructed for the Committee. N 2 180 REPORT—1878. usually assumed the temperature of the surrounding rock, that is to say, their reading has ceased to alter. The insulation of the quick- silver prevents alterations during the drawing out and reading of the thermometer. The correctness of the result is in no way prejudiced by sediment from the boring which may yet remain in the hole. The pouring in of some water may even be useful in accelerating the experi- ment. Wet bore-holes with standing water are, however, to be avoided, because rock-temperature and water-temperature are not identical. “In the manner last described, at every available opportunity, that is to say, when the work of the tunnel is from any cause compelled to cease for a few days, rock-temperature observations are now instituted in bore-holes ready to our hand. The observations are simple, give exact results if taken with proper precaution and suflicient duration of the experiment, and cause no further expense, since the thermometers, being sunk in the rock, are secured against wanton injury, and there are always bore-holes available.” Dr. Stapff further states by letter that, the two original thermometers supplied by Negretti and Zambra having been broken, he has had others made, in which he has introduced the improvement of hermetically seal- ing the outer glass case, instead of closing it with a waxed cork, which gradually admitted moisture. In the Report for 1876 an account was given of the observations of Herr Dunker in a bore about 4000 feet deep at Sperenberg, and allusion was made to the undue weight which had been attached by some writers to the empirical formula in which Herr Dunker sums up his observations ; a formula which indicates a retarded rate of increase, and, if extended to: greater depths, leads to the conclusion that the temperature reaches its maximum at the depth of about a mile. A discussion has been carried on in Germany on this subject,* chiefly in the ‘ Neues Jahrbuch fiir Mineralogie, &c., and the best authorities seem to be unanimous in rejecting the hypothesis of a retarded rate of increase- in the earth’s surface as unwarranted, either by the Sperenberg observa- tions or any others. Herr Dunker himself concurs in this opinion. Dr. Stapf also, though some of his own empirical formule indicate a retarded rate of increase, writes to Professor Everett in the following terms :— ‘* As to my formulas, I beg you to remember that they are not con- structed for expressing laws of Nature. They simply are made for facilitating the view over a heap of figures and data of observation. And generally [ beg you to be sure that those formulas in my mind cannot express any law for the increase of warmth at greater depths than those - in which the tunnel observations were made. The formulas give good means for eliminating empirically some of the influences of the shape of surface which occur in the profile of the mountain.” Mr. W. Galloway, one of H. M. Inspectors of Mines, has taken observations in Fowler’s Colliery, Pontypridd, South Wales. The shaft is 846 feet deep, and the air current down it amounts to between twenty - and thirty thousand cubic feet per minute. In order to determine the normal temperature of the coal, a hole 15 inch in diameter was bored in the side of a narrow place that was being * See papers by Mohr, Heinrich (two papers), Dunker, and Hottenroth, in the ‘Neues Jahrbuch’ for 1878, 1876, and 1877, by Brauns, in the ‘ Zeitschrift fiir die gesammten Naturwissenschaften,’ 1874, p. 483, and by Hann in the ‘ Zeitschrift der Osterreichischen Gesellschaft fiir Meteorologie,’ 1878, p. 17. ON THE RATE OF INCREASE OF UNDERGROUND TEMPERATURE. 181 rapidly driven in the solid coal. The hole was bored in the very face, to the depth of four feet. The thermometer (one of the Committee’s slow- action non-registering instruments) was placed at the inner end; then a wooden cylinder of nearly the same diameter as the bore-hole, and 9 inches long, was pushed in until it came in contact with the copper case of the thermometer ; and lastly a wooden plug, wrapped round with cloth, was driven firmly into the mouth of the hole. The thermometer was at 58° F. when it was put into the hole, and after remaining there from 2 p.m. on August 25th, 1876, to 3.45 p.m. on the following day, it stood at 62°-7. There was no water whatever in the hole, and the depth below the surface of the ground was 855 feet. The circumstances of this observation seem to preclude any consider- able disturbance of the normal temperature; and combining it with the mean annual temperature at the surface, which is said to be 51°°5, we aot an increase of 11°-2 F. in 855 feet ; which is at the rate of 1° F. for feet. Two other observations were taken in other parts of the mine. They are not directly available for the purposes of the Committee, but were intended to test the influence of air-currents on the temperature of the coal; and they show variations of 2° or 3° according to the season of the year. Observations are being taken for the Committee by Mr. G. F. Deacon, Borough Engineer of Liverpool, in a bore which has attained the depth of 1004 feet, in connexion with the Liverpool Waterworks at Bootle. The temperature at this depth is 58°-1. The observation nearest the surface was at the depth of 226 feet, the temperature at this depth being 52°. We have here a difference of 6°1 in 778 feet, which is at the rate of 1° for 128 feet, and the same rate is approximately maintained throughout the descent. For instance, at 750 feet the temperature was 56°, which gives 1° for 131 feet by comparison with the depth of 226 feet, and 1° for 121 feet by comparison with the bottom. The bore is 24 inches. in diameter, and the observations were taken with a protected Phillips’s maximum thermometer every Monday morning. The operation of boring was continued up to twelve o’clock on Saturday night, and was not resumed till the temperature had been taken on the following Monday. The time that the thermometer remained at the bottom was not less than a quarter of an hour, and was sometimes half an hour. The rock-formation consists of the pebble beds of the Bunter or lower trias, and most of it is described as hard, close-grained, and compact. The speed of boring is indicated by the dates of the observations at 226 and 1004 feet, the former being Nov. 12th, 1877, and the latter Aug. 12th, 1878. A month was lost by the jamming of the drilling tool, in May and June, 1878, when a depth of about 890 feet had been attained. The depth from the surface of the ground to the surface of water in the bore has gradually decreased from 66 feet, when the bore was at 318 feet, to 52 feet when the bore was at 800 feet, and to 51°1 feet at the present depth. It would thus appear that the inflow of water from below has increased with the depth attained. There is a slow percolation from the upper part of the water-column to an underground reservoir near at hand, the top of the water-column being considerably higher than the top of the water in the reservoir. Mr. Deacon remarks that the 182 REPORT—1878. slow upward flow which supplies the water for this gradual discharge is favourable to the accuracy of the observations (which have always been taken at the bottom,) by checking the tendency of the colder and heavier upper water to descend and mix with the lower. As bearing on the subject of the disturbance of temperature by the stirring of the water in boring, as well as by the generation of heat in the concussions of the tool, it may be mentioned that the last observation before the month’s interruption by the jamming of the tool was 57°5, at 886 feet, and the first observation after the extraction of the tool. was 57°-0, at 898°6 feet ; the former being on May 20th, and the latter on July 1st. The smallness of the difference between these two temperatures seems to indicate smallness of disturbance by the action of the tool. It appears from these various circumstances that the observations are entitled to considerable weight, and that the rate of increase of tempera- ture downwards at Liverpool is exceptionally slow. It will be remembered that the rate found by Mr. Fairbairn, at Dukinfield Colliery, in the adjacent county (Cheshire), was also very slow, though not nearly so slow as that indicated by these Liverpool observations.—(See our Report in the Volume for 1870.) Mr. E. Wethered, of Weston, near Bath, has also commenced obser- vations in a colliery in that neighbourhood. Mr. J. Merivale, of “Ned- derton, near Morpeth, has received a thermometer for observations in a colhery. Mr. J. T. Boot, of Hucknall, near Mansfield, has received a second thermometer (in place of a broken one) for observations in a deep bore, and Mr. Rowland Gascoigne, of the same town, has received one for a similar purpose. In the eleven years which have elapsed since the appointment of this Committee, a large amount of useful work has been done, by methods of observation not requiring any elaborate or expensive appliances, or any special training on the part of the observers. Two difficulties are encountered in investigating underground tem- perature. We have to contrive instruments which shall truly indicate the temperature at the point of observation, and we’ have further to ensure that this temperature shall be the same at the time of observation as it was before the locality was artificially disturbed. As regards the first of these difficulties, the Committee have been completely successful, and have largely increased the resources at the command of observers. But in regard to the second difficulty, the same amount of success has not been attained. The circulation of water in bore-holes and of air in mines are disturbing elements difficult to deal with. Even such firm plugging as was employed to isolate portions of the water-column in the great bore at Sperenberg cannot altogether remove the error arising from convective disturbance; for the long-continued presence of water at a temperature different from that proper to the depth affects the tempera- ture of the surrounding rocks, and the temporary isolation of a short column would not abolish this source of error, even if the plugs them- selves were impervious to conduction and convection. After the experience which has now been gained of rough and ready methods, it is time to consider the propriety of resorting to a more special method, which has been more than once suggested, but has. hitherto been postponed on account of the additional labour and skill which would be requisite for carrying it out. ON THE EXPLORATION OF THE FERMANAGH CAVES. 183 There can be no doubt that the surest way to bring any point of a boring to its original temperature is to fill up the bore, and reduce it as nearly as possible to its original condition. Several instruments have been contrived which, when buried in the earth, with wires coming from them to the surface, admit of having their temperature observed by electrical means. One of these is Siemens’ resistance thermometer, another is Wheat- stone’s telegraphic thermometer, of which a description will be found in the Report of the Dundee Meeting of the British Association; another is Becquerel’s thermo-electric apparatus, which has been employed by its inventor and his son and grandson for some forty years. It is described in the following terms in the first report of this Committee (1868) :— “The thermo-electric method might also be followed with great advantage. T'wo wires, one of iron and the other of copper, insulated by gutta-percha or some other covering, as in submarine cables, and connected at their ends, might be let down, so as to bring their lower junction to the point where the temperature is to be taken, their upper junction being immersed in a basin of water, and the circuit completed through a galvanometer. The temperature of the water in the basin might then be altered till the galvanometer gave zero indication.” Sir Wm. Thomson now adds the recommendation, that, in carrying out this method, the two wires, each well covered with gutta-percha, should be twisted together; that the wires should be stout and as homo- geneous as possible throughout, and that a piece of stout copper tube should be attached to the lower junction, this tube being uncovered and in close contact with the earth all round, its purpose being to ensure that the junction takes the proper temperature. It would probably be desirable, ia filling up the bore, to mix clay with the original material, to render it watertight, for it would be ‘ea to render the filling of the bore as compact as the surrounding rock. Several pairs of wires would be buried in the same bore, with their lower junctions at different carefully measured depths. The upper junctions would be kept in a room provided with a steady table for a mirror-galvanometer. Report of the Committee, consisting of the Rev. Dr. Hauauton, Prof. Lert Apams, Prof. Barrerr, Mr. Harpman, and Dr. MacaListEr, appointed for the purpose of Exploring the Fermanagh Caves. Drawn wp by Mr. Tuomas Piunxert, Enniskillen, for Dr. Mac- ALISTER, Secretary of the Committee. Propasly there is no locality in Ireland where there are so many interesting caves found as in the region of Knockmore, in Fermanagh. Fifteen of these caves have been explored during the past three years, every one of which yielded memorials of man, and were no doubt used by savage tribes as dwelling-places. A.—The first cave explored this year was partially excavated last year. It penetrates a deep escarpment on the eastern side of a rocky hill, and 184 REPORT—1878. attains a length of about fifty yards, and in width varies from three to nine feet. The floor was irregularly formed, some parts of it being quite level, but in some places the floor passed in with a very swift incline. The first or top layer was composed of dark mould, and varied in thickness from one to two feet deep. In this layer bones of the sheep, goat, and Bos longifrons were found, also some sea shells and a large iron cloak-pin or skewer, 54 inches long, which had a ring on the head or larger end of the pin. Underneath this stratum there was a deposit of rock débris and yellow clay, in which were found large angular blocks of limestone which had fallen from the roof. Thisstratum was very irregular in depth, and varied from two to eight feet deep; charcoal, rude pottery, and a very large quantity of animal bones—some of them broken—were dug out of this stratum, also flint flakes and one bone pin. Underneath the above deposit there was a layer of calcareous breccia, covered over in some places with sheets of stalagmite ; the latter in some places attained a thickness of two feet. Animal bones were found embedded in the stalag- mite, also charcoal, and in the stratum underneath, on which the sheets of stalagmite rested, bone pins and flint flakes were found associated with broken bones.* The next stratum reached during the excavation was composed of brown tenacious clay, which resembled brick earth and rested on gravel, and was no doubt deposited at the period when water traversed the cave. This was excavated to a depth of ten feet, but no animal remains or work of art was found in it. B.—‘ The Ram’s Cave” was the second explored, and occurs in the top of a cliff several hundred feet high. It is a small chamber, about four feet high and ten feet long, and was very dry inside. The deposit on the surface of the floor was composed of black mould, which had a depth of two feet, and contained charcoal, burnt bones, and a bronze pin. The next stratum was composed of a gravelly kind of earth, and contained a few angular blocks of limestone. This stratum yielded rude pottery, charcoal, and the bones of the red deer, wild boar, goat, sheep, and fox. C.—The third cave examined was about six feet wide, and extended into the rock for a distance of twelve feet. This cave yielded a large quantity of broken pottery, some of it very rude. The first stratum re- moved was composed of carbonate of lime mingled with brown earth, and contained bones of the pig and red deer, and pieces of pottery which bore traces of ornamentation. The next layer removed was of an average thick- ness of about eighteen inches, and was composed of dark mould, and con- tained a quantity of charcoal and rude pottery devoid of any ornamen- tation, also broken bones belonging to Bos longifrons, horse, deer, dog, and sheep. D.—The fourth cave explored opens out on a rocky slope, and the surface of the floor passes in with a gentle incline for a distance of thirty yards, when the passage becomes entirely choked up with a deposit of stalagmite. The surface of the floor was covered over from end to end with rough angular limestones; while these stones were being removed, bones of the horse and boar were found mingled with them. These stones rested on a deposit of yellow clay and carbonate of lime. During the removal of this stratum a quantity of animal bones were found associated * The bones have been submitted to Dr. Macalister fot examination, and his report will be presented to the next meeting of the Association, The caves have no local names, so we have indicated them by letters. ON THE ERRATIC BLOCKS OF ENGLAND, WALES, AND IRELAND. 185 with charcoal ; nothing else of any interest was found during the explora- tion except the tusk of a boar, which was whetted to a sharp edge, and probably was used as a knife by the cave-dwellers. E.—“ Shining Rock” cave enters a rock on the south side of Knock- more, and prior to its excavation was nearly filled to the roof with rubbish and débris. The top stratum was almost entirely composed of vegetable earth, and of an average depth of two feet, and yielded some bones of fox, dog,and deer. The layer underlying this contained a quantity of bronze or iron clay, also bones of the pig, deer, and rabbit. Near the bottom of the cave a quantity of bones were found in calcareous breccia. A large portion of the bones found in the lower strata of this cave were bound up in this material. F. is a commodious cave a short distance from the above; it passes through a rocky hillock and can be entered at either end. Midway it assumes the form of a square chamber, which measured ten feet high and six feet broad; the top stratum was of a dark mouldy character, and yielded similar bones as the other caves explored. In the lower stratum, which was composed of reddish clay, flint flakes and marine shells were found. The explorations were suspended after the exploration of F cave, as the probability is that none of the caves in this district will yield bones of extinct mammalia or objects of any great interest. Siath Report of the Committee, consisting of Professor Prestwicu, Professor Harkness, Professor Hugues, Professor W. Boyp Dawkins, Rey. H. W. Crosskry, Professor L. C. Mraz, Messrs. _G. H. Morton, D. Macxintosn, R. H. Tippeman, J. E. Lex, James Piant, and W. Penceity, Dr. Deanz, Mr. C. J. Woopwarp, and Mr. Motynevx, appointed for the purpose of recording the position, height above the sea, lithological characters, size, and origin of the Erratic Blocks of England, Wales, and Ireland, reporting other matters of interest connected with the same, and taking measures for their preservation. Drawn wp by the Rey. H. W. Crosskey, Secretary. Tis Committee has pursued its inquiries, and is able to record many new and important observations. In many districts, however, the obser- vations are not yet completed, and it will be necessary for the work of the Committee to be continued for some time, before they can be justified a classifying the facts collected, or in presenting any theoretical con- clusions. The Committee are favoured with the following notes on Boulders near Kendal by Mr. J. R. Daxyns :— The most remarkable boulders near Kendal are those of the granite of Wastdale Crag, near Shap Wells. These boulders are specially interest- ing, for two reasons: in the first place, boulders of the granite of Wastdale Crag, or the Shap Granite, as it is often called, can be readily identified 186 REPORT—1878. by means of the large crystals of pink orthoclase felspar which the rock contains ; and, secondly, the distribution of these boulders near Kendal would seem to show that they must have travelled over the high ground south of the granite area, and not followed the course of the present drain- age ; for I have traced these boulders, north of Kendal, directly towards this area on the one hand, while on the other hand I have not noticed them in the depression extending from Kendal to the river Lune, along which the London and North-Western Railway runs, east of Docker Garth; but as I have not minutely examined this part of the country, I cannot say which is the precise eastern limit of the boulders. It seems, then, that the Shap granite boulders came nearly due south from Shap Fells, across the high ground over which the old coach road goes from Kendal to Shap. The highest point where the granite occurs in place, viz., Sleddale Pike, 1659 feet above the sea, is higher than the greater part of this ground; but the greater part of the granite area is lower than the ground across which the boulders travelled in their southerly course; nor is there immediately to the north of the granite any ground as high as the granitic fell itself. The greater part of this fell, sloping northward, drains into Wet Sleddale, whose waters, forming the river Lowther, flow north, and, joining the Eden, go out to sea by the Solway ; the remaining small por- tion, including the site of the quarries, facing southward, overlooks Wast- dale Beck. This beck flows N.E. along the strike of the rocks to Shap Wells, where its waters turn sharp at more than a right angle, and thence flow 8.8.E., and join the Lune at Tebay. On the south side of Wastdale rise the Upper Silurian falls to the heights of 1691, 1589, 1494, 1588, 1544, 1523 feet above the sea; the lowest part of the range being the Hause, over which the coach road goes. The height of this point is not given on the Ordnance one-inch map; but it is between 1300 and 1500 feet above the sea, and is probably over 1400. Across this high ground the Shap granite boulders travelled south from their parent rock, which - attains an extreme height of 1659 feet at its most westerly outcrop, and a height of 1478 on its steep southward face ; while north of these points the granitic area falls gently away northward, the centre of the area being about 1373 feet above the sea. The general due south course of the boulders is further shown by an examination of their distribution south of Kendal. Itis not to be expected that very many boulders should now remain scattered over the surface of the rich and highly cultivated land near Kendal; they have mostly been long since cleared off the surface of the pasture and meadow land, and are now to be found built into the walls, where, however, they are good evi- dence of their existence in the country, because boulders are not carted a long distance for walling in a country that has plenty of such material at hand; but there are some large boulders still remaining unmoved, from the place where they were once dropped by the ice, and in ploughed lands others are from time to time turned up and placed among heaps of stones for road metal. Ihave traced these boulders as far south as Milnthrop; they occupy a narrow band of country, whose long axis points directly for the granite of Shap Fells. I have not seen any west of the river Kent. The most westerly I have seen are some near Hincaster, still lying undisturbed in a lane. A line drawn from Sleddale Pike, the most westerly outcrop of granite on Shap Fells, to these boulders bears south by west. The most easterly that I have noted in this neighbourhood is a large one in a field —— SS ON THE ERRATIC BLOCKS OF ENGLAND, WALES, AND IRELAND. 187 near Windy Hill, about two miles S.E. of Kendal railway station; but I once saw one high up on the side of Grayrigg Fell, north of Grayrigg V'arn, which lies a good deal farther east. The chief boulders still in their original position are the following : Several on Spital Wood; one near the Kendal reservoir; one or two on the Castle Hill, Kendal; the one near Windy Hill; one on the east side of Helm; some boulders of granite and of the altered rock surrounding the granitic area near the footpath by Murley Moss to Oxenholme ; one in a drift bank cut through by the canal near Larkrigg ; several in the fields east of Stainton; others near the footpath from Stainton to Sedgwick ; one on the top of a drift hill, half a mile due west of Sellet Hall; several near Hincaster; some in front of a farm house at Wath Sutton. I have also found granite boulders on the roadside between Natland and Helm, at the inns near Helm End, and in a field a quarter of a mile west of Storth End, and on the road half-a-mile N.E. by north of Storth End, and at the bend of road east of Milnthrop station, besides in many other places, which it would be tedious to mention. Boulders of the dark compact altered rock that surrounds the granitic area are generally found along with the granite boulders. When the localities where granite boulders occur are marked on a map, the steady lineal north and south direction of their course is very striking. Boulders of the ordinary volcanic rocks of the Lake Mountains indicate other directions for the ice-flow ; thus a large boulder of volcanic breccia from the Lake Mountains may be seen lying on the side of the Sedbergh road, about two and a half miles out of Kendal, and east of the line of granite boulders. As the granitic area of Shap Fells is at the extreme east end of the volcanic rocks, this boulder must have crossed the line of flow along which the granite boulders travelled. Amongst noteworthy boulders is a monster boulder, by the natives designated by the undignified term of a “cobble,” of voleanic ash in the beck course at Stainton, measuring 9x6~x4 feet, or 216 cubic feet. The distribution of boulders on the bare limestone fells in the neigh- bourhood of Kendal is in some particulars remarkable. Thus, on Farleton Fell, a conspicuous hill of bare limestone on the east side of the Lancaster and Carlisle Railway, there are very many large limestone boulders lying on glaciated surfaces, and often having pebbles and small boulders of Upper Silurian rock beneath them. Some of these limestone boulders, too, are standing on edge with their planes of stratification vertical or highly inclined, so that there can be no doubt about their being true boulders. On the same fell there are, as already stated, many small boulders of Upper Silurian rock; but I have met with no boulders of volcanic rock or of granite on this fell. Unfortunately I could find no good scratches to show the direction of the ice-flow ; but, considering the great size and number of the limestone boulders, and the smallness of the Upper Silurian ones, I should be inclined to think the ice came from the N.W.., in which _ case it would traverse a great extent of limestone country, and the Upper Silurian rocks that were the origin of the boulders would be several miles distant ; and this transport of boulders probably took place while the adjacent limestone area was free of drift, and therefore before the trans- ° port of the granite boulders, which, as being found in the drift that now covers the low ground N.W. of Farleton Fell, belong to the time of the deposition of this drift. 188 REPORT—1878. The limestone fell immediately west of Kendal, which ends in the fine escarpments known as Scout and Cunswick Scars, overlooking a broken foreground of Upper Silurian rocks to the Lake Mountains in the distance, is singularly free from limestone boulders. This is only what might be expected, as it is the extreme north end of the limestone area; for this fell is plentifully strewn with large boulders of Upper Silurian rock, and small ones of voleanic rocks, though there are a few large boulders of volcanic rock as well; for instance, one well-glaciated boulder of volcanic ash about a mile and a half S.W. of Kendal, and a large one above Cunswick Scar, near the footpath to Kendal. Whitbarrow, too (another bare limestone fell), is generally free of limestone boulders, except at the south end, where there are several large ones; but Silurian boulders are pretty generally distributed over it, and amongst these one large boulder of ash deserves notice. This boulder, which is a tolerably conspicuous object on the fell, is situated on the western side of the fell, perhaps a mile or better S.W. of Row. It is about six feet high, and is split in two, the inner surface of one portion corresponding to that of the other. But the southern portion has been moved away from its fellow, slightly on the western side, but as much as several feet (five or six) on the east; the general result being motion from north to south. One might fancy that the boulder was originally split as it fell off the end of the ice, and that subsequently the ice had shoved one part slightly away from the other. Connected with boulders is the difficult subject of the accumulation of drift. For a geologist who has a day to spare at Kendal no more instructive walk can be recommended than this. Walk ont along the Kendal and Sedbergh road for about five or six miles till you come to the summit level, 930 feet above sea, then tarn south -acoss the fell called New Hutton Common to its summit, 1097 feet high. Looking S.W. from this point you will see spread out before you in the Gatebeck and Saint Sunday Valleys, a tumultuous assemblage of mounds, a truly wonderful sight. These mounds are the vast moraine, or system of moraines, which the great glacier, or ice sheet if you will, of old threw down in the low ground between Helm on the right and the uplands on the left, ending in Scout Hill. And if anyone wishes to see moraines of the ordinary Swiss type, shed by local glaciers, let him go to the recesses of the mountains to the head of Long Sleddale ; there in one of the finest dales of the lake country, though one but rarely visited—he will see plenty such. Mr. D. Mackintosh reports some new facts relative to the derivation of boulders already discovered by members of the Committee, the existence -of several large boulders previously unrecorded, and the extent to which Treland has sent erratics into England. In our Report for 1875 there is a full account of many large blocks of felspathic rock in the neighbourhood of Bromsgrove, Worcestershire. I have principally examined them between Catsbill and Hagley, in a district from which granite would appear to be entirely absent. From a com- parison of their shape, size, appearance of weathered surface and internal structure as revealed by chips, I have no doubt whatever that these boulders are what may be called an overshot load from the great Arenig stream of erratics which has found its way through Llangollen Vale into the central plain of England, and which has left large blocks about Chirk ‘and Welsh Frankton (west of Ellesmere). In our Report for 1876 there is ‘an account of the Arenig dispersion, and the enormous Cefn felstone ed i eS ON THE ERRATIC BLOCKS OF ENGLAND, WALES, AND IRELAND. 189 boulder is mentioned. Some distance S.K. of Cefn, and abont a quarter of a mile S.E. of Chirk Bridge, on the east side of the Holyhead road, there is a felstone boulder, the greater part of which is evidently buried. The exposed part is about 13 x 7 feet, and three feet above ground. Between this boulder and Welsh Frankton, Arenig erratics are numerous, and some of them are very large. A short distance west of Welsh Fr ankton, and close to where a canal is crossed by the main road, 8 x 8 feet of an Arenig boulder may be seen above ground. It is somewhat varied in structure, part of it approaching the character of hornstone. Around Welsh Frankton there are numerous moderate-sized, and a few very large Arenig boulders, One, close to Mr. Oswell’s house, is quite 8 feet in average diameter; and another, a few yards distant, 8 x 6 x 5 feet. They a are accompanied by good-sized boulders of Silurian grit and Carboni- ferous sandstone and quartzite from the Welsh borders. Mr. Mackintosh lately found a number of lumps of a very oe rock in a gravel-pit which had been excavated in an undulating continuation of the large and abrupt mounds of middle drift age which may be seen south of Ellesmere, Shropshire. He has since found many more lumps at Wrexham, and, after much inquiry, he cannot hear of any rock like it in situ. It looks very much like silicified chalk, but the fossil evidence is in favour of its Jurassic age. A fragment of lias, with characteristic fossils (now in the possession of Mr. W. Shone), was very lately found about 8 feet down in upper boulder clay at Guilden Sutton, near Chester; and Mr. Watts, F.G.S., has found large chalk flints and a specimen of Gryphca incurva in a boulder clay at Piethorne, near Rochdale. These erratics, in all probability, came from Ireland. Mr. Motynevx reports as follows upon Boulders in the Midland District :— Stretching westwards from the town of Burton-on-Trent, and bounded on the south and east by the Trent Valley and on the north by that of the Dove, is a range of table-land, from 100 to 300 feet above the levels of those rivers, and comprising within its limits the broad acreage anciently included in the Royal Forest of Needwood. ‘The whole area is covered more or less thickly with one or the other or each of the three different deposits which constitute the Boulder clay group of the Midlands. These deposits consist in well-defined divisions of sand, gravel, clay, and boul- ders, and are of an aggregate thickness of 120 feet. On the less elevated face of the country under consideration they repose directly on Red marls, and on the higher tracts of Christchurch-on-Needwood and Bagot’s Park are the lower division of the Rhewtic beds, which there appear in charac- teristic force and condition. The boulders, or rock masses, occur prin- cipally at from three to ten feet below the surface, intermixed with blue and yellow clay, and consist of angular, sub-angular, and rounded frag- ments of Carboniferous limestone and chert, Yoredale sandstone, Millstone grits, Granites, Porphyry, Syenite, Greenstone, Trachyte, and Toadstone, with smaller fragments of Liassic and Oolitic rocks, many of which bear the usual evidences of the action of ice. There is also, stretching across the high grounds of Hanbury Woodend, running east and west, an extra- ordinary trail of Chalk flint flakes. The Boulder clays, with their asso- ciated deposits, cap the high land of Waterloo Hill and Moat Bank on the east side of the Trent Valley, and the same description of rock masses 190 REPORT—1878. enters largely into the composition of the basement bed of the valley gravels at Burton-on-Trent, but in a more rounded condition. Gryphea and other Liassic shells are frequently found in the sand and gravel of each deposit. During some drainage operations at Sinai Park, overlooking Burton- on-Trent, many hundreds of tons of boulders were excavated, the weight varying from a few pounds to half aton each. Iam in a position to place on record one only of these boulders, which deserves a place in the catalogue of Staffordshire erratic rocks. This was exhumed from near the surface of some gravel workings at Postern House, three miles due west from Burton-on-Trent, and where the letter P, of Postern House, in the Ordnance Survey map, occurs. It lay at 180 feet above the Trent Valley, and is an angular fragment of coarse Millstone grit five feet six inches long by four feet six inches deep, one of its sides being planed down by ice action. Another sub-angular boulder of Syenite was about two years ago obtained from the bottom of a well sunk in the valley gravel at the brewery of Messrs. Truman, Hanbury, and Buxton, at a point just north of the letter B in Burton-on-Trent, between the road and railway, as shown on the Ordnance map. It lay at twenty-four feet from the surface, embedded in a foot or two of Boulder clay, which there comes between the valley gravel and the Red marls, and which with other similar evidences is conclusive proof of the excavation of the Trent Valley hereabouts before the Boulder clay period. The boulder weighs nearly a ton, and was removed for preservation to the residence of the writer, about a mile south of Burton-on-Trent on the Lichfield road. Mr. James Piant continues his reports upon the Boulders in Leices- tershire :— (1.) Isolated Boulders. The ‘“‘great erratic” from Humberston (briefly described in a former report) has been recently laid quite bare to the bottom. There is a great quantity of traditional material connected with it, and it must have excited considerable interest in the ‘‘olden time.” Several distinguished antiquarians have written upon it, and described these traditions. I believe that this block has a certain relation to the monolith “ St. John’s Stone,” exactly three miles §.W. by W. across the valley of the river. Both blocks are on the rise of the land, and visible from either locality if a fire was lighted on each at night. A festival (Romish) was formerly held near the St. John’s Stone (a vestige of old “fire, or sun worship’’) on Midsummer Day, and this Humberston block would be in the line of the greatest eastern sunrise. This boulder is situated in St. Mary’s parish, on the Pochin estate, on Kirby’s Farm, Humberston, Leicestershire, close to the bend of the road from Humberston to Thurmaston. It measures 8 feet x 7 feet x 5 feet, and its weight is nearly 20 tons. It is pentagonal, edges sharp and an- gular. Longest axis is N.W. by S.E. It has about six deep irregular grooves two inches deep on the top, sides nearly vertical and smooth, and the striations are in direction of the longer axis. It is composed of the syenitic granite of Mount Sorrel, distant 54 miles N.W. from the locality. Many legends are connected with this block, and it is known ON THE ERRATIC BLOCKS OF ENGLAND, WALES, AND IRELAND. 191 in the locality as Helstone. It is 230 feet above sea (ordnance datum), and marks a boundary on the farm; all land on the farm east of the stone is called Ost-end, and all west West-end. It lies amongst lower glacial “ drift-clay,’’ and is quite isolated. It was thought by many per- sons to be the rock in situ. It rests upon worn surface of Rhetic beds. It is to be removed to the grounds of the Leicester Museum, and photo- graph taken before removal. Another large isolated boulder is situated at Loseby, Leicestershire, on the estate of Sir F. T. Fowke, Bart., Loseby Hall, Leicestershire. It measures 5 feet 3 inches x 3 feet 5 inches x 2 feet 4 inches. It is rounded and worn, is long shaped, has never been moved by man, and has small sroovings at various angles on all the sides exposed. It is composed of millstone grit, which occurs 35 to 40 miles N.W., but it may have travelled 80 miles if it came from the north. It is 650 feet (ordnance datum) above the sea; and rests in “upper glacial drift,” composed of sand, flints, chalk, lias, sandstone, millstone grit and pebbles of various sorts, and lumps of clay. (2.) Groups of Boulders. The first group recently found in the “Coleman Road”’ (a new road about two miles from here) is quite a new district for boulders. The group occurs in Evington parish, near Leicester; the road is about two miles long, in a ‘‘cutting” through “Crown Hill.” The largest boulders are 3 feet 3 inches x 3 feet x 2 feet 6 inches; the smallest 1 foot 3 inches x 1 foot x 1 foot. They areangular and sub-angular, except the block of “‘limestone,” which seems rounded, but it may have been done in svtw. All have been moved in excavating the road, and many broken up. Most of the sandstones, grits, and limestones, have striations in various directions on the top and sides, and at different angles. The localities at which rocks of the same nature as the boulders occur are—Mount Sorrel, Groby, and Markfield, east side of ‘‘ Pennine Chain,” in valley of River Derwent, and Stanton, valley of the Erewash, Sherwood Forest, country round Nottingham, Ticknall, Crick Hill, Wirksworth, Derbyshire. The distances of these localities are as follows :— Miles. MVEGMTIT SOTTOL es. os crac daeor dues daaeaeecneeh gas sn vesteldavlcccads 8 N.N.W. USL STOREY EECA Romige OAAReR ecocecnOOBeECetUctcct Pec eBCOseeOodnec 8 N.W. IW EITO Gnas a cawas costae wccacest acest aideopntacinesoceacestuede se 10 N.W. PADEILOTIN Se ino Graces tawakcecvlieecusceascaUadnassscacqcasecctics 22 N.W. PBIRESVE Slee eon, sdasieetae ee ret ane cacetccdatalssedvacdesesateneness 24 N.W. MBVSTWOTUDN sos aces cateaet creas coe coeeete eb eteroeeents 35 and 40 N.W. Sherwood and Nottingham .............ssesesseeeeeeeees 24 N.N.W. perce Fertsnlllets 82 tied ena 58s ct shidacabledads Sur dacmen dune gees 20 N.W. @ricks ands W irks worth od... ccc ccccsaccsceeweesose soacs 40 N.W. Sixteen blocks were measured and examined; 7 of these were syenite and syenitic granite, 5 triassic sandstones, 2 millstone grit, and 2 mountain limestone. A great many of the limestones, grits, and sandstones have been broken up for road metal, being softer than thesyenites. The group is about 350 feet above the sea. The area covered is about 50 yards long by 10 yards wide. A few boulders occur in other parts of the road, but of smaller dimensions; many boulders are left i the sides of the cutting, and every indication seems to be that great numbers spread out in the 192 REPORT— 1878. hill. The boulders were found at depths of four, six, and eight feet in cutting the road through the hill, many lying in the gravel (flint gravel) on the narrow end, as if all the materials had been solidified when deposited on the lower lias clay.. A second group occurs in Aylestone parish, near Leicester, near the third milestone from Leicester. The largest boulder is 3 feet x 2 feet 10 inches x 2 feet 10 inches; and the smallest 2 feet x 1 foot x 10 inches, The boulders are angular, and all having been moved out of a sand-bed ; no striations can be seen. They are derived from Groby, Markfield, and Charnwood Forest. Groby is six miles distant N.N.W., and Markfield eight miles N. All are composed of syenite. The group is 280 feet above the sea, and has about two feet of gravel over it, and covers an area about ten yards square. The boulders were all covered by a deposit of gravelly drift, and were found in the sand. A third group occurs in Aylestone parish, Belmont Park, Leicester, half a mile east of Aylestone. The largest boulder is 2 feet 6 inches x 2 ~ feet x 1 foot 10 inches; the smallest is 1 foot x 10 inches x 9 inches. The boulders are angular and sub-angular; and all have been moved in making new roads. There are no striations. Rocks of the same nature are found at Mount Sorrel, Groby, Markfield, Bradgate Park, in Charnwood Forest, at a distance of six to eight miles. They are composed of syenite greenstone, syanitic granite, 20 blocks were measured and examined. The group is 320 feet above the sea, and covers an area about 100 yards by 20 yards. It is covered by gravel containing flint. A fourth group occurs in St. Margaret’s parish, on the estate of the Freehold Land Society, Leicester, on the road leading to Evington from Leicester. The largest boulder is 3 feet 1 inchx2 feetx1 foot 10 inches, and the smallest 1 foot 5 inches x 1 foot 2 inches x 1 foot 1 inch. The boulders are rounded, angular, and subangular; out of twelve boulders eight are syenitic granite, two triassic sandstone, one millstone grit, one oolite. The gronp is 290 feet above the sea, and covers an area 100 yards square. It was uncovered by making foundations for houses ; all have been moved. No striations exist on the igneous rocks, but the sandstones and oolitic blocks are striated at various angles. Igneousrocks of the same nature are found at Mount Sorrel, Groby, sandstones at Nottingham, oolitic rocks at Ketton near Stamford, at the respective distances of eight, twenty-six, and twenty miles. A fifth group, occurs in Evington parish, ‘Spinney Hills” Road, Leicester. The largest boulder is 3 feet x1 foot x1 foot; the smallest, 2 feet 6 inches x 1 foot 2 inches x 1 foot 4inches The boulders are sharp, fresh looking, angles all round; no striations are visible. Rocks of the same nature are found at Mount Sorrel, a distance of six and a half miles. They are composed of syenitic granite, and are at the height of 290 feet above the sea. They have been moved out of a field to the side of the road, but are on the S.E. side of “ Spinney Hills,” and therefore must have come over them. A sizih group occurs in Saxe-Coburg Street, Leicester. The largest boulder is 3 feet 3 inches x2 feet 2 inches x2 feet; the smallest, 2 feet 6 inches x 2 feet x1 foot 10 inches. The boulders are angular and sub- angular; no striations are visible. Rocks of the same nature occur at Mount Sorrel, a distance of six miles N.N.W. They are composed of syenitic granite, and are 260 feet above the sea, and cover am area twenty yards square. They have been exposed by the excavations for streets and sewers, and foundations of houses. ON OUR PRESENT KNOWLEDGE OF THE CRUSTACEA. 193 A seventh group occurs on the Town Estate, Victoria Road, Leicester. The largest boulder is 2 feet 9 inches x 2 feet x1 foot 10 inches, and the smallest 1 foot 8 inchesx1 foot 6 inchesx1 foot. The boulders are angular, and without striations. Rocks of the same nature occur at Groby and Markfield, a distance of five miles and seven miles N.W. They are composed of syenite, and are 260 feet above the sea, covering an area of 30 yards x10 yards. They have been exposed in excavations. An eighth group occurs at Clarendon Park, near Leicester. The largest boulder is 2 feet 6 inchesx1 foot 5 inchesx1 foot 7 inches, and the smallest 1 foot 9 inches x 1 foot 5 inches x 10 inches. Three are rounded, others are angular and sub-angular, but the rounded edges may have been done in sz¢w. All have been moved out of excavations ; no striations. Rocks of the same nature occur at Mount Sorrel at a distance of seven- and-a-half miles N.N.W. The boulders are all composed of syenitic granite, and are 300 feet above the sea, covering an area of 20 yards x 10 yards. Report on the Present State of owr Knowledge of the Crustacea.— Part IV. On Development. By C. Spence Bats, F.R.S. [PLATES V., VI., & VII.] Hayine, during the last three Reports, given an account of the present state of our knowledge of the dermal skeleton of the higher forms of Crustacea as it appears in various genera in the adult animal, it is desirable that we should next obtain some knowledge of the forms that these animals undergo in their passage from the ovum to the adult. It is highly probable, judging from the very perfect resemblance to the parent form that the animal attains while yet young, that the earlier zoologists believed them to quit the egg in this condition. For when Bose took in mid-Atlantic the small animal which he christened Zoé, he never for a moment thought that it was the young of some other form. Tt was in 1802 that it was first described, and ranged by the author between the Branchiopoda and Amphipoda. But Latreille, inthe first edition of the ‘Régne Animal’ of Cuvier, placed it at the. end of the Branchiopoda, between Polyphemus and Cyclops, while expressing an opinion that it approached nearly to the Schizopoda. Leach seems to have held this same opinion, for without giving his reasons, he placed it at the end of the legion of Podophthalma, by side of Nebalia. Desmarest, in his ‘ Consid. sur Crustaces,’ places it in the order Branchiopoda, near Branchipes, while Latreille ranks it with “ Monocles,” while Milne-Edwards ranges it, with doubt, at the end of the Decapoda, with other questionable genera, after the Schizopoda, and before the Stomapoda. In 1830 Vaughan Thompson took a zoxwa in Cork harbour that while in his possession passed into the Megalopa stage, which induced him to assert that zozea was nothing more than the larval stage of one of the erabs common to our shores, This idea was much doubted by the naturalists of the day, more 1878. : 0 194 REPORT—1878. especially Milne-Edwards, Latreille, and Westwood, as the idea of any metamorphosis in the development of the Crustacea was contrary to preconceived opinions, and to the careful and very complete observations of Rathke on the development of the embryo in the common crayfish of Europe (Astacus flwvialis). The articles of Milne-Edwards in the ‘ Dictionnaire Classique d’ Histoire Naturelle, and the remarks of Latreille in the ‘Cours d’Entomologie,’ were followed in 1835 by what appeared at the time to be an exhaustive ~ discussion of the subject by Mr. Westwood, His observations were carried out upon the ova of some land crabs, that were living in the Zoological Gardens, with an exactitude and care that has left little to be added. Mr. Westwood’s memoir was published in the ‘ Philosophical Trans. actions of the Royal Society,’ and he received the honour of the Society’s gold medal for what, at the time, appeared to be a complete refutation of Mr. Vaughan Thompson’s theory of metamorphosis in Crustacea. Itis, however, a very remarkable coincidence, that the same volume of the ‘Philosophical Transactions,’ 1835, that contains Mr. Westwood’s com- munication on the absence of any morphology in the progressive develop- ment of the Gegarcinus, also published a memoir of Mr. Vaughan Thomp- son on the larva of the Cirripedia, showing not only that a very extensive form of morphology takes place, but demonstrating conclusively that they are crustaceous animals, and bear no relation to the mollusca among which they previously had been generally classed by naturalists. From this time until the present, the young form and development of these animals have been of the foremost interest in marine zoology. In 1839 Capt. Du Cane sent to the British Association, and pub- lished in the ‘ Annals of Natural History,’ a communication on the forms in which the young left the egg in the common prawns and shrimps of our coast. And soon after (1852), Mr, R. Q. Couch gave an account at the Dublin Meeting of the British Association of the form in which the young left the ovum in the common crawfish (Palinwrus vulgaris) of our seas. In each of these the form so differed from one another, and from any of the others, that it began to appear as if the young of every genus in the Crustacea left the egg in a larval form, different in character. This view appears to receive much strength from the development of the larva, in Mysis, although many of the changes which this animal undergoes are those of a subembryonic rather than a larval condition, since they take place previously to the animal’s becoming an independent creature. An elaborate account of the development of this animal is given by Van Beneden, in his memoir on the littoral animals of Belgium. Since then, the crowning interest was given by Dr. Fritz-Miller, when he captured a small crustaceous animal in the high seas which in general form corresponds with the small entomostracons genus known as Nauplius. This he pronounced to be the early condition in which some of the prawns, and especially Penzus, quits the ovam. Some naturalists accept this hypothetical discovery as conclusive, while others more cautiously consider that the evidence Fritz-Miiller has received is not sufficient, the more especially since several genera of prawns are known to quit the ovum in a more advanced form. (PI. V., fig. 1.) It should be remembered in the reporting on this discovery of Fritz- Miiller, that first it has not been taken in connection with the parent, second, that it has not been traced from the nauplius to the zoza con- dition, and lastly, has not been traced by Miiller beyond the Schizopod a” _ belonging to the family Huphauside, and this he states to pp. 46 ON OUR PRESENT KNOWLEDGE OF THE CRUSTACEA. 195 stage, hence its connexion with Penzus has not been demonstrated at either extremity of the chain of evidence. The little creature, according to Miiller, is rather opaque and of a brownish colour, darkest towards the extremities of the appendages. It is by these little appendages that the young animal swims, lashing the water and working its way upwards to the light. The first change that is observable is that it becomes slightly larger, and the terminal part projects into two pointed processes, terminating in the two long caudal hairs which were previously present, and to which others less important have been added. The number of hairs on the natatory appendages have also increased. At this stage the form of the carapace is first indicated in the presence of a transverse line. In this we perceive an important variation from the forms of either the Cirripedia or decapod Crustacea, and moreover contrary to that of the Euphausia as illustrated by Metschnikoff. In the youngest forms of Decapoda and Cirripeds the carapace is defined from the earliest stages. In Lophogaster, according to Sars, the development resembles that of Mysis. The form of the embryo is more annulose and the formation of the great dorsal shield is more progressive. According to Fritz-Miiller the development of the carapace in the young of Penzus is upon the same plan, and is first detected by the presence of a line immediately behind the third pair of appendages. In the anterior pair may now be seen that which after the next moult Fritz-Miiller takes to be the first pair of antennz. The second pair becomes the second antenne, and the third pair becomes the mandibles : close to which a large helmet-shaped protuberance, which is taken to be the homologue of the anterior labrum, is present. In this early stage Dr. Miiller sees within the third pair of appendages the mandibles with a prominent acute tooth and a broad transversely furrowed masticatory surface, and he says that the mandible must bear a non-setigerous appendage. Posterior to these three pairs of lobes, the embryonic condition of the future oral appendages make their appearance; the eyes still continuing to be represented by a solitary central organ. The rudimentary appendages exhibit within the sacs the presence of hairs, which induced Dr. Miiller to believe that after the next moult the animal will pass into the Zooa stage. But here the progressive link is _ broken in his researches, and there is nothing to demonstrate that this Nauplius form passes into a Zocea stage more than the young of Mysis does. ° Previously to the time that Miiller found his Nauplius, Professor Sars (1862)* studied the development of Lophogaster typicus, a Schizopod be precisely similar to that of Mysis. In 1871 Metschnikoff communicated to ‘ Zeitschrift fiir Zool.’ his ob- Servations on the young of Huphausia. The first specimens he found in the open sea, and hypothetically assumed that they were the young of Euphausia, although they were not in any way connected with the parent, _ and had undergone one or two changes of form since quitting the ovum. He says: “I was yet convinced that it by no means represented the earliest larval form as it escaped from the ovum. I could only hypo- Archiv. des Sci. Phys. et Nat., tome xxi., p. 87, and An. Nat. Hist., vol. xii., 1864, 1. O02 196 REPORT—1878. thetically point to a six-legged transparent Nauplius as to the earliest larval condition of Kuphausia. This supposition has since been confirmed by the examination of a considerable number of free-swimming Euphausia larve. Besides the larve, which were in various stages of progress, I fished up, he says, some ova from which I procured some Nauplii of the youngest form, but as my observations on the embryonic development of the Schizo- poda have not been concluded, I shall only describe the ovum containing a mature larva.”’ (PI. V., fig. 2.) “The ovum is a complete ball, in which one can distinguish two mem- branes. Between the exterior membrane—the extraordinarily delicate Morion—and the inner, the yolk skin, is a fluid clear as water, whick I have also seen in the ova of Penzus. The yolk skin covers closely the now quite mature and highly transparent larva, which latter shows three distinctly developed pairs of extremities. Through the movements of the larva the egg-membranes are torn, and there escapes a peculiar animal, on the oval body of which three pairs of appendages are attached which exhibit the peculiarities of the Nauplius form of Crustacea.” “The first pair is simple, while the two others are branched and articu- lated into three joints, 7.e. two basal and the terminal; the only existing opening is the oral aperture which is in the median line between the base of the third pair of appendages. It appears in the form of a very small hole which leads to a narrow cesophagus. With the exception of red tint on the ventral surface, the larva is otherwise colourless and transparent, and it is with much difficulty that some of the interior organs can be distinguished.” Herr Metschnikoff was able to trace some of the early changes, and was in bopes to be able to remove some of the objections against Fritz-Miller’s treatment of the development of Penzus. He tried to follow the various alterations in the same specimen, but failed to keep the animals alive after a short period in his vessels. He was however here enabled to trace the changes which conduct, he says, the larva ‘into that condition which Claus has already described,” but remarks that all the forms examined by him lost with their moulting the indented or crenulated margin of the carapace, which shows that he had to do with another species than Huphausia Mulleri of Claus. He concludes with saying that he “must draw attention to a phenomenon which is common to the Nauplius stage of Huphausia and Penzus, the contemporaneous formation of the several pairs of appendages succeeding the larval and swimming -feet.”’ ‘It is,” he continues, ‘‘remarkable that such a mode of formation is not observed in any Entomostraca which have been developed through the Nauplius metamorphosis. I have examined in this relation the Cirripedes and Branchiopoda, and became convinced that in these crustacea the maxillaries are developed apart from the other appendages, as has been shown by Claus to be the case in the Copepoda.” Professor Claus has given the subject his attention, but his researches, like those of Fritz-Miiller, were carried on upon specimens taken in the high sea, without any immediate clue to the parent from which they derived their origin. It is certainly remarkable that so advanced an observer as Professor Claus should have been content to have drawn his conclusions from such incomplete and unsatisfactory data, particularly as he considers that an imperfect appreciation of the development of the Crustacea has occasioned in recent days the supposition relative to the genetic relationship of ON OUR PRESENT KNOWLEDGE OF THE CRUSTACEA. 197 insects, and as a further consequence to considerable inquiries about the origin of Crustacea. The importance of obtaining accurate knowledge of the relationship of the young and immature forms with those of the adult animals, is exem- plified by the numerous speculative theories which have arisen and depend upon the correctness of Fritz-Miiller’s discovery. Claus, in his ‘Crustaceen Systems,’ says that Fritz-Miller even believed that he found in the Zowa of Crustacea the origin of the insects, and very soon this view was made use of by others for the Arachnoidea. “Anton Dorhn,’’ says Claus, “has endeavoured by peculiar reasoning to prove the Zowa form to be a stage in the development of the Ento- mostraca, and sought to show that the Phyllopodes, Ostracodes, and Co- pepoda have once passed through a free Zozwa stage during the phylogmatic development.” Claus distinguishes two more typical stages in the metamorphosis of Crustacea between Nuwplivs and Zowa, which he distinguishes by the names of Metanauplius and Protozoed ; but as these are given to stages in the progress of development rather than to forms that represent the stages as they leave the egg and become free creatures, I doubt if this addition to the nomenclature will ultimately be found to prove convenient. He moreover contends that of all Crustacea now existing that of the Phyllopoda is most probably that which bears the nearest resemblance to the primordial type, and that Nebaliaand Branchipus most nearly approximate the earliest representations. In the Schizopoda and Peneide the larva he asserts is hatched as a Nauplius, and undergoes its further development in free life ; the rest of the Caridea go through the Nauplius and Protozoxa stages within the ovum, and that the first stage of free life is that of the Zowa, mingled with features of the Mysis-like stage. The Thalassinide and Paguride are hatched in the Zova stage. In the course of his researches Dr. C. Claus has determined the early forms of Leucifer and Sergestis, neither of which, although Schizopods, pass through the Nauplius condition, and Professor Sars says that Lophi- gaster, one of the Huphauside, develops its young as Mysis. And we know from actual observation that the young of the Anomura leave the ovum in a form little distinguishable from the Zowa of the Brachyura, and in a more advanced condition. It is desirable in a Report which is intended to record the present state of our knowledge of the subject, to define clearly what is understood by the several names applied to the larve of Crustacea according to the form in which they quit the ovum. Here I feel it a duty to protest strongly against the terms larva and pupa which have of late been much introduced into the study of carcino- logy. They are the more objectionable at this present time when there is a desire to trace the connection of one class of animals with another, inasmuch as the terms are likely to convey the idea of a closer approxi- mation by the resemblance of the nomenclature than may exist in natural phenomena. The term larva is suggestive of the grub or caterpillar con- dition in which insects leave their ovum, but as the condition in which the young of the Crustacea varies in form and degree, is not only different in families but in animals that might be classified as belonging to the same genus, as is the case in Orangon vulgaris and Crangon boreas, but for the different stages in which the young are hatched. 198 REPORT—1878. For the term pupa I believe that Mr. Darwin is mainly responsible. He having introduced it in his monograph on the Cirripedia, when there a'p- peared to be a great change in the progressive growth of the young which was thought to equal the metamorphosis of insects, if not to represent it in kind. I therefore propose to substitute the term Brephalus (from /péoc, infant: adc, sea), or young marine animal, for the term larva, while that of ‘‘ pupa ’’ had better be suppressed. Seeing that the development of the animal is gradually progressive, there is no stage or state of the animal which can be represented by it. In this Report, whenever used, the term brephalus will mean the form of the animal as it quits the ovum, no matter whatever stage of develop- ment it may represent. The several terms used for the young animal in its separate stages have been taken from animals which had been previously described as adults. These are, Nauplius, Zoza, Phylosoma, and Megalopa. Each of whichis now recognised as being a stage in which the brephalus quits the ovum, and therefore one in the development of the Crustacea. To these must now be added those of Metanauplius and Protozcea. The term nauplius, as representing one of the stages in which the embryo of the Crustacea quits the ovum, was introduced by Fritz-Miiller in 1864, in consequence of his having taken a small crustacean that while in general form it resembled the entomostracan genus Nawplius, yet exhibited unmistakable evidence of being the young of some macrurous decapod : which he believed to be that of Pencus. Metschnikoff has announced that the brephalus of Buphausia is in the form of nawplius, while it is known to be that of all the cirripedes as well as most of the entomostracous Crustacea, but these last, excepting Bran- chipus, differ from the typical Nauplius in having but two pairs of free appendages. The nauplius, as it quits the ovum of the Malacostracous parent, is an animal of an ovate form, having three pairs of free appendages, the first of which is unibranched while the other two are biramose, and a single ophthalmic spot or imperfect central eye, and a strongly projecting labrum or anterior lip. This is the state in which Euphausia (Plate V., fig. 4) is hatched accord- ing to Metschnikoff; and Peneus according to Fritz-Miller. (Pl. V., fig. 1.) ; Shortly after it has become a free swimming animal it moults its external skin, and with each successive exuviation it advances a stage in development, its first apparent advance is in the appearance of lobes that ultimately become the appendages of the mouth. Metschnikoff remarks that this phenomenon is common to the nauplius of Huphausia and Pencus,. that is, the contemporaneous formation of several appendages succeeding the three original pairs of swimming feet. He says moreover that it is remarkable that such a modé of formation is not observed in any of the Entomostraca which have been developed through the nauplins metamorphosis. It is this stage for which Claus has suggested the term Metanauplius (Pl. V., fig. 2), while that for which he proposes the name of Protozowa is when the pleon is developed, but neither the pereiopoda or appendages of the pleon are present. (Pl. V., fig. 3.) But here we have so close an approximation to the Zova as it leaves the | ON OUR PRESENT KNOWLEDGE OF THE CRUSTACEA. 199 ovum of the Brachyura, that it appears doubtful if there be any distinction between Protozoa and Zoza. : Fritz-Miiller comprehends under the term Zowa all those brephali(larve) that have two pairs of antenne. The oral appendages and the gnathopoda present the latter in the form of swimming appendages. Having in view the young of the Brachyura, Anomura and Macrura, as wellas certain stages in the development of the Stomapoda, whilst he could not include the young Schizopoda with the six pairs of legs (Huphasia) which Claus considers must be accepted as a zowa form. Claus considers that there is a highly im- portant character excluded from this definition,—the stage of the develop- ment of the pereion, or, as he terms it, the limbless central body ((ileid- massenlosen Mittelleibes) in contrast with the pleon (Hinterleib) and its ap- pendages. Thisis, he says, just the characteristic of the zoza, which needs explanation, and at the same time contains the key tor the comprehension of the structure of the zoza stage of the Malacostraca. It is necessary to understand and explain the striking relation of the pereion that exists in an immature condition, and from which sprout the five pairs of pereiopoda between the cephalon, with its numerous well-developed appendages and the well-formed but still limbless pleon. He says that almost in all forms of brephalus (larva) the pereion is either completely suppressed as in the Decapoda, or appears in the form of rudimentary somites, as in Schizo- poda and Stomapoda. The pereiopoda are produced later than the ap- pendages of the pleon. ‘“ Of course,” he continues, “ an exception must be made for the zowa of Penceus, from which the limbs of the pereion are pro- duced previously to those of the pleon, with the exception of the two lateral appendages of the tail, which as belonging to the sixth somite of the pleon appears sooner, or at least about the same period, as those of the pereion.”’ In arriving at this conclusion Claus appears to have gathered his facts from too circumscribed an area. Assuming his observations on the development of Penceus to be correct, he has overlooked that of the typical zoza when it quits the ovum, as seen in Carcinus Meenas, and that of Stenorhyncus, Inachus and Maia, of the latter two of which he has himself given figures that represent the pereiopoda advancing in develop- ment anterior in degree to that of the pleopoda. Moreover, the- bre- phalus (larva) of Homarus and Palinurus have the pereiopoda well ad- vanced in formation previously to any evidence of the pleopoda being in existence. Whilst others have them developed in a common ratio. The zovea of Crustacea therefore may be defined as a brephalus (larva) that has two pairs of antenne, the oral appendages and gnathopoda more or less developed, but in which the pereiopoda and pleopoda are yet absent or in an immature condition. This is the condition in which the brephalus quits the ovum as the zowa of the Brachywra, Anomura, and some Macrura. But in each there is a persistent feature that distinguishes one form from that of the others, and as far as my own observations have led me precludes their being con- ‘founded one with the other. . The brephalus of the brachyura is a zoca (Pl. VL., figs. 3 and 4), and the _ Most constant as to its general type of all the families of the class. With the exception Gecarcinus, which quits the ovum in the Megalopa stage, I ‘amnot aware of any other of the short-tailed crabs that is not hatched in the zowa condition. ‘* That of Carcinus menas, as our most common European species, may 200 REPORT—1878. be taken as the type of zowa. When it quits the ovum, and throws off the enclosing membrane, and swims first as a free animal, it has a dis- tinct and well-developed carapace. It is dorsally arched and laterally compressed and rounded off at the infero-posterior angles. It is, moreover, armed with long characteristic spines on the dorsal and lateral surfaces, and anteriorly with a great rostrum, but these features vary in different genera, as shown in Pl. VI., where the two extremes areseen. In Tra- pezia, fig. 3, the spines are all very long, in Gelassimus, fig. 4, they are very short. The pereion is in a compressed or immature condition, and the pleon has six well-developed somites, the terminal one ending invariably in a fork-like extremity that varies in degree, and is armed with a greater or less number of strong stiff ciliated spines that differ in a constant degree so as to enable one almost to define the generic limits of species. It has invariably two pairs of antenne, represented by the early budding con- dition of the permanent organ in the first pair, and by deciduous represen- tatives in the second in the form of two long teeth or spines; the mandibles and two succeeding pairs of oral appendages ; the third pair, or tetartognathus, being absent ; while the gnathopoda are developed into large characteristic swimming appendages. Of these, which are invariably biramose, one represents the permanent and the other the secondary branch of the adult organ : in this early condition the primary or permanent branch is five-jointed, and the second three. The number of these joints repre- sents the more or less advanced condition of the zosa, and corresponds with the progressive development of the animal. The pereiopoda are represented by two or three small sac-like lobes, within which the several pairs may afterwards be seen to be developed. The brephalus of the Anomurais also a zowa (Pl. VL., figs. 1 and 2), and differs from that of the Brachyura more in general appearance than in its degree of advanced development. The anterior portion corresponds, ex- cept in the armature of the carapace, very closely with the same part in the zowa of the Brachyura, while the posterior portion of the animal assimilates more nearly with that of the zoza of the Macrura. If we take the zowa of Pagurus as the type, we find that the carapace is dorsally more depressed than in that of the Brachyura, and extends nearly horizontally from the rostrum to the posterior margin of the cara- pace, the lateral margins are not so deep, and are produced posteriorly, so as to form a prominent process or tooth on each side. This projection is very constant, but varies in degree with separate families. The rostrum also is generally prominent, and projects horizontally forwards. The pereion is not appreciably developed. The pleon has six somites, the posterior one being long, and terminating in a broad fan-like telson, the posterior margin of which is divided into two halves by an excavation that varies in extent in different genera. Hach division is furnished with fine strong ciliated spines, which stand on their own well-defined lobes, and the outer angle is armed with a short sharp tooth. The eyes are large and ovate. The first pair of antenne resemble those of the Brachyura, they are single jointed, and support several auditory cilia, and two ciliated hairs, one apical, and the other (the longer) sub- apical. The second pair of antenne consist of a basal joint and two appen- dages: one is cylindrical, and tipped with two or three long ciliated hairs; the other is formed into a broad flat squamose plate, straight on the outer side, where it terminates in a strong tooth, and arched on the inner side, and fringed with numerous long gpinous hairs richly furnished with cilia. ort Brit. Assoc. 1878 Aes nat.c. 3S, b. F. Hawkes, del, a, D> ANS MESS Ma ON OUR PRESENT KNOWLEDGE OF THE CRUSTACEA. 201 .The mandibles are without an appendage. The oral limbs are assum- ing much of their permanent form, except the tetartognathus, which is not visible. The gnathopoda are developed very similarly to those in the Brachyura zoza, but exhibit a joint more in the development of the primary branch of the second pair. One solitary hair, differing in length, structure, and position from the others, appears to be constant in all forms of the Anomura zoza. In some species it is nearer the base of the apical joint than in others; but it is invariably constant, extremely long, and furnished with very long and delicate cilia, that are inserted at right angles with the main stalk of the hair. I do not remember having observed it on any zowa but those of the Anomurous Crustacea. The zowa of the Porcellanide (PI. VI., fig. 2) may readily be distin- guished from those of Pagurus by the length of the rostrum and postero- lateral processes of the carapace, which sometimes equal the length of the animal, and sometimes half; by having unarmed spinal processes to represent the second antennz, instead of a ciliated squamose branch, and by having the last somite of the pleon terminating in a broad flat plate, the posterior margin of which is posteriorly produced to a point, instead of being hollowed, while it carries five ciliated hairs on each side of the median line. In one species, Claus figures the termination as produced to a long spine. The zowa of Galathea(Pl.V., fig. 6) may be distinguished by the posterior margin of the carapace being definitely serrated; by two dorsal teeth on the posterior margin of the somites of the pleon; by the extremely long ovate eye occupying about one half the length of the carapace ; by the presence of a sharp serrated tooth at the distal extremity of the basal joint of the second antenne; by the shortness of the cylindrical branch that ter- minates in a small tooth and one ciliated hair; and the sharply pointed distal angle of the squamose branch of the same antenne. The zowa of Dromia (Pl. VI., fig. 1), much resembles that of Pagurus, except that it appears to have no posterior processes at the infero-distal angles of the carapace ; but more especially by the form of the telson, which -is extremely deeply cleft in the median line of the posterior margin. The brephalus of the Macroura differs very much in the character in which it quits the ovum in separate genera. Those that leave it in the zowa (Pl. V., fig. 5) condition are very distinguishable from those of the Brachyura and Anomura. The zoza of the common Shrimp (Crangon vulgaris) may be taken as the type of the form. It differs from the zoza of the common Prawn (Palemon squilla) in very small details, one of which is in having a pointed rostrum that it loses with the second moult. The carapace, long, narrow and moderately compressed, furnished with a slender rostrum projecting horizontally forwards, having no projection or tooth along the posterior and lateral margins. The pleon consists of six somites, of which the last is expanded into a flat membranous plate, slightly indented in the median line of the pos- terior margin, and fringed with six ciliated hairs, and one, the external, small spine-like point. The eyes, a, a, are large, and obliquely ovate. _ The first antenne, b, b, are two-jointed; the basal joint is long and cylin- drical ; it supports at the outer distal angle a stiff ciliated spine, and at the extremity the second branch, which appears in the form of a small uni- articulate joint, out of which near the extremity another seems ready to 202 REPORT—1 878. bud, supporting at its apex a crown of auditory cilia, and one short ciliated hair. The second antenne, c, c, consist of a peduncular basal joint, supporting two branches ; the internal gradually narrows from the base, and termi- nates in a long spine-like hair fringed with cilia; the external is in the form of a squamose plate, the external margin of which is straight, and the internal becoming broader from the base, and then rapidly running to an apex; the inner oblique distal margin being fringed with ciliated hairs. The mandible and oral appendages are well formed, each assuming an approximation to the adult condition, except the posterior, or fetarto- gnathus, which assimilates to that of the gnathopoda, the character of which it partakes. In each, the number of joints in the primary ramus has increased to six, and the pereiopoda exhibit evidence of rapid develop- ment, in the form of cylindrical pendulous sacs, which decrease in length posteriorly. There are slight variations from this form in different genera. In Palemon the primary branch of the gnathopoda have but four joints, and terminate in stiff short spine-like hairs; while in Crangon the hairs are long, flexible, and ciliated. This latter is the case with the zowa of Alpheus and Stenopus; while in that of Hymenocera the character is more in accordance with Palemon. The zowa in these orders respectively, Brachyura, Anomura, and Macrura, while they differ from each other, yet possess characters that are generally common to two. The form of the carapace in the zoza of the Brachyura, with its great dorsal spine, which although in some genera, as Gelassimus, Libinea, and Mencetheus, it is much reduced, so that in the last it is a mere prominence, is still a feature peculiarly characteristic of the zozea of the order. Next to which are the great spines on the lateral walls of the carapace. The presence of these is not so constant, but they are never seen on the carapace of any zoeea in either of the other two orders, In the Anomura great lateral spines, and sometimes smaller spines, project from the posterior margin of the carapace; these, together with the rostrum, more or less important, is a feature peculiar to this order, and from my own knowledge Iam not aware of any exception to this rule. But Claus, in his work so frequently quoted, has given the figure of one that has all the characters of the zowa of the Anomura; but he calls it an “ Krichthina larva”’ (Pl. IV., fig. 1), but adds, ‘‘ Nach Willemoes- Suhm die Larva von Leucifer ;’’ but certainly it bears no resemblance to the young Hrichthina as it quits the ovum of the adult Squilla. Another feature that especially belongs to the zoza is that of the terminal somite of the pleon, or telson. It is always forked in the Brachyura, and the few cases in which the terminal spines are short, still retain a distinct and characteristic feature of the group. In the zova of the Macrura the carapace is free from spines or processes, and the terminal somite is flattened out into a broad thin fan-like plate, divided in the median line by a more or less defined emargination. Now, if we compare the zoxa of the Anomowra with these two groups, we shall find that the tendency is to class them from their general form with the zowa of the Macrura. And this, without exception, includes the Porcellanide, Dromide, and other depressed forms, as well as the Paguride. And the stage in development of the antennz exhibits an ap- proximation to the Brachyura zowa only in the first pair, while in all the other appendages the Macrwra features prevail. aa ON OUR PRESENT KNOWLEDGE OF THE CRUSTACEA. 203 It. would therefore necessitate, if the Anomwra be excluded from its place in the classification of the Crustacea as a sub-order, as suggested by Claus, that it should go over to the Macrura as a whole, including the genera Dromia and Galathea. But it appears to me that if Claus’ figures be those of Albunea (Crustacean Systems, Pl. TX., figs. 1-10), as he thinks probable, the evidence is strongly in favour of the retention of the sub- order, for the broad fan-like telson is suggestive of an internal Anomurus structure. It would appear, therefore, the evidence is much in favour of the argu- ment that the development of Crustacea shows there is a group of zowa between the two well-defined orders that exhibit features that belong to it, and are not common to the others ; and these features show an advance in the development of the crustacean embryo before it quits the ovum. The nearest form of crustacean life to the zoza when it quits the ovum, appears in the young of Squwilla, which has long been known by the name of Alima. The advancement in development is shown in the distinctly pedunculated character of the eyes; in the articulated condition of the peduncle and the two distinct branches of the first pair of antenne ; in the character of the gnathopoda, which assumes a resemblance more dis- tinctly typical of the adult feature; and in the advanced development of the four posterior pairs of pereiopoda. Alima is more advanced in development when it quits the egg than zoswa, but not so much so as the young of the genus Homarus, which is developed in what Claus and Fritz Miller have named the Mysis stage ; that is, the appendages of the cephalon are well advanced towards their adult form, and those of the pereion carry a secondary branch, or ecphysis, attached to the third joint or ischium of each pair of pereiopoda. But in this last-named genus we find that some of the pleopoda are present; and the curious phenomenon exists, that, while an enormous amount of development has gradually proceeded to such an extent that all the appendages are rapidly assuming the permanent type, those of the pleon, which in some genera are in advance of those of the pereion, in Homarus remains in abeyance, and appear not to have progressed beyond the zoza stage. This curious fact is exemplified more decidedly in the genus Palinurus, where the pleon appears to be in a still more embryonic condition, while the cephalon and pereion are distinctly pronounced, in a parallel con- dition with that of Homarus, from which it differs most apparently in the length of the pereiopoda in Palinuwrus, and in the absence of the chelate character of the first pair of pereiopoda. In the young of Crangon boreas (Phipps)—which naturalists have been divided in opinion as to whether it should be embraced in the same genus with Orangon vulgaris or not—the young is advanced in development beyond the condition of the zowa as it is in Crangon vulgaris. It quits the ovum with all its appendages conspicuously advanced, whether they belong to the cephalon, pereion, or pleon. This we find to be also the case in the genus Thalascaris, an undescribed deep-sea genus belong- ing to the Challenger collection of Crangonide. A still further advance is found in a form closely allied to Alpheus, that I believe has been recorded as a species, but which I described in the ‘ Transactions of the Royal Society’ under the generic name of Homaral- pheus, on account of its resemblance in the adult form to Alpheus, and in its young to that of Homarus. 204 REPORT—1878. A deep-sea genus, closely allied to that of Azius, that I have named Eiiconazius, taken during the Challenger cruise in the Eastern seas, has the same advanced condition of the embryo, and shows that the Megalopa stage exists not unfrequently in moetas Macrura, although we have previously had no evidence of it. The fresh-water genus Astacus (Pl. VI. Ce 5) and the land crab Gecar- cinus, long since made known to us, the former by Rathke, and the latter by Westwood, leave the ovum in the last stage, which is that of an approxi- mation of form to the adult animal, while it yet retains many features that exhibit incompleteness of development. This is most apparent in those parts which show a tendency to depart from the characteristics of the order to adapt themselves to constitutional requirements; as, for instance, the adult Alpheus mostly lives in dark places under stones, groping in mud and in such like spots at the bottom of the sea at a few fathoms deep. To suit this condition of things, it is highly convenient to the animal that the eyes should be protected; and since the peculiar habitat of the animal is that of dark holes, those in which the eyes are least improved by use are as suitable to its existence as others; those which are protected and least liable to injury become the kind most adapted to survive. Thus it follows, that while the rest of the animal advances in growth the eyes remain in abeyance, and the anterior margin of the carapace extends beyond and overlaps them, thus affording protection, and by its tenuity admitting a sufficient amount of light for the purposes of the animal’s requirements. Thus it appears that the development of Alpheus shows a relative retrograde character in the progress of the eyes to that of other parts. So again, in the comparison of the pleopoda in the Brachyura in the adult with those of the megalopa stage of the same animal, we find that of the younger framed upon a simple type adapted for swimming, while in the adult it is altered to suit other purposes—in the female to support the gravid ovum, and in the male those of the anterior to assist in copulation, while those of the posterior are more or less rendered obsolete in consequence of the absence of any duty to fulfil. The study of the several forms in which the embryo quits the ovum in Crustacea is, I believe, very instructive, as bearing on the tendency of variation of forms in adult animals. From the earliest forms to that of the most perfect, in which the brephalus quits the ovum, there is a series of stages in which the embryo appears ready to take upon itself the conditions of a free and independent animal. This capability does not appear to be connected with any par- ticular adult type, or conditions of existence, but exists in closely allied species and genera as well as in those that are extremely distinct: neither does it appear to bear any relation to the more or less advanced character of the several genera. The following list is the order of the various stages of development, ‘when the brephalus quits the ovum, together with the adult form from which it is derived. TIBET 35 osccceconanoc ace Euphausia (Metschnikoff), Penzeus? (F. Miiller.) 2. Meta-nauplius ............ None. 3. Proto-Z0#a,.......0sseceeeee None. A. ZOE |. calecescecoeaenmee enn Brachyura, Anomura, and some Macrura. 5. Phyllosoma ............0.+ Palinurus. 6. Megalopa ..........0.se000 Astacus (Rathke), Gecarcinus (Westwood). —eE_O———E————————————<_—=—_— ON OUR PRESENT KNOWLEDGE OF THE CRUSTACEA. 205 In this list the earliest or nauplius form belongs to Huphausia, or the lowest stage in the classification of the adult animal; while the next stage, or zowa condition, belongs to all the higher forms with the exception of one genus only among the Brachyura, and some of the Macrura, To these belong the phyllosoma and megalopa stages. Before we can conclude our report on the development of Crustacea, it is desirable that we should examine the earlier stages of the embryo, as well as the character of the various ova in relation to the adult forms. The eges of Crustacea vary in size in different genera and sometimes in form, but not very much in this latter feature, never more than from round to oval and egg-shaped. But in size the variation is greater, and this not in relation to the proportion of the animal; for Palinwrus, which is two feet long, has the ovum only one-quarter the size of that of Astacus, which is only three inches long. Some idea may be gathered by the following list of the diameter of the eggs of the animals that have been examined ; that are from the ovum of the fresh-taken animal and from specimens preserved in spirits. Crangon ...... ma Thalasscaris ...... os Paleemon ...... is Cr. boreas ...3 ATCHOS) 5.4 0255+ 000 x Palinurus ...... a Homarus...... ip Astacus ............ § Willemeesia ...3; Carcinus ...... xo Cancer re. .-oscoes 0 Pagurus......... 35 The ova are attached to the pleopoda of the mother in all forms of De- capod Crustacea by means of a membranons filament that varies in separate mera. In Palcemon, it is very thin and transparent, and differs from that of the Brachyura and other forms. It is not easy to determine its origin, but there are connected with it, as if incorporated in the structure, certain epithelial-like cells, that in form and appearance resemble those that Mr. Alfred Sanders has figured as living zoosperms belonging to Palemon Squilla ; they are much larger and appear as if flattened, and absorbed into the surrounding structure, which spreads out to an ex- treme tenuity, and encompasses the entire ovum, which it holds and suspends. In some genera it is exceedingly slender and delicate, and easily ruptured ; in others it is strong, fibrous, and not easily broken. The observations that I have made have generally been on the most common forms that I could procure alive, such as Crangon, Palemon, Homarus, Astacus, Palinurus, Portunus, Carcinus, and Cancer. The two first of these are very suitable for examination from the beautifully trans- parent nature of the vitellus ; while those of Homarus and Astacus afford advantages from their large size. The ovum is generally round, but in some species, as in Palemon, they afterwards become somewhat oval. (Pl. VIL, fig. 1.) The yolk in most instances fills, or nearly fills, the egg: but in some cases, as described by Metschnikoff, there is a tolerable space between the membrane that encloses the vitellus and the chorion. This he states to be the case in the ova of Huphausia and Peneus, and I have observed that the same condition exists in the ovum of the genus Nika. This space is filled by a clear and slightly viscid fluid. At first the yolk consists of numerous minute cells, very uniform in size, that appear to have little or no cohesive property to each other. Taken separately, they appear to be tolerably transparent, but in the aggregate they assume a colour that is peculiar to each genus. In some the colour of the vitellus is grey, in others yellow, orange, brown, green, and purple. Shortly the mass of 206 REPORT—1878. the vitellus appears to divide into larger masses, each mass being the con- gregation of a number of cells adhering together by compression, as if the cells had increased in size and with the increase enforced a correspond- ing pressure against each other; each cell, moreover, contained within itself a number of smaller ones. The vitellus at a not very distant period becomes transparent, accord- ing to our observation, at one spot (Pl. VII., fig. 2a) on the margin, When viewed laterally, it appears like a line of clear fluid near the chorion, while the cells of the vitellus that are in contact with it have become large and transparent, but tolerably even along its margin. This line extends along the surface and deepens towards the centre. Later and closer inspection shows that this transparent region extends to some depth below the surface, and continued examination demonstrates that it is progressive, so that the vitellus, while united at one point, is so deeply divided at the opposite, that it appears to cover the embryo on each side. Soon the cells appear to congregate together into lobes and film over with a skin of extreme tenuity ; but these lobes, a, b, c, upon inspection are repeated on each side, while a central one occupies a space between them, while another, more important, is also apparent in the same line; all these are, at this stage, nearly equal in progressive de- ‘velopment, the two central being perhaps the largest, certainly the longest. (Pl. VIL, fig. 3.) Soon after, three or four smaller lobes are seen to be formed in a con- tinuous line with the preceding marginal ones, at this early stage the last- named central lobe may be observed to divide into two equally prominent ones at its extremity. A little later and all the several lobes become clearly defined. The four latest pairs that appeared are less massive than the three previously existing pairs, and the whole, even at this early embryonic stage, may from their relative position and arrangement be detected in their connexion in the advanced embryo. (PI. VIL, fig. 4.) The three pairs of lobes that were first brought into existence are more massive and globular in their appearance. They are marked a, b, c, in the figures, and very soon may be observed to assume definite forms. The first (a) is rather long and compressed. The second (b) globular at one extremity but apparently extended at the other; while the third (c) is extended and bilobed at its extremity. Under a slight compres- sion these distinctions of form become readily appreciable to observation. It is within our power to determine with confidence at this early stage that these three pairs or sets of lobes occupy the position of the future organs (a) of vision and antenne (band c). The great central lobes that separate them, and which in the decapoda approach each other, cor- respond, the one to the labrum, the other to the terminal extremity of the animal; and the three or four smaller lateral lobes (d, e, f, 7) that appear a little later correspond with the oral appendages of the future animal. Having ascertained in this incipient condition the relation of the first group of three anterior pairs of lobes to the appendages of the adult animal, and observed how closely these lobes correspond with each other at first, and how they vary and become distinct from the succeeding,— a distinction that is suggestive of their being a separate group of append- ages,—leads to the conviction that they correspond with the three an- terior pairs of appendages in the earliest or nauplius form of Crustacea, as they exist in the brephalus of the Cirripedia. To strengthen this idea and give it demonstration, take the small dark ON OUR PRESENT KNOWLEDGE OF THE CRUSTACEA. 207 spot that is considered to be an imperfect organ of vision. The oph- thalmic spot is visible at this period in the embryo. (Pl. VIL, fig. 5.) If we follow this examination through succeeding periods, we find the progression of the development of the embryo to be distinct and con- tinuous, and the changes important and reliable. The small ophthalmic spot is present and the two central lobes are still in apposition, but have become more elongated. The first (a) of the lateral lobes has enlarged and become more massive and consolidated in structure. The second and third (0, c) have increased very considerably in length and lost the lobe- like appearance, putting on that of more extended appendages; whereas those of the three succeeding pairs of lobes still retain their simple lobe-like character. (Pl. VII., fig. 5.) The several parts are now becoming very distinguishable in their relation to the rest of the animal, and it is interesting as well as instructive to examine the nature of the structure in detail. The first or most anterior pair of lobes, a, meet together at the anterior extremity, at the union of which the ocular spot is visible, while they are separated at the opposite by the intervening central lobe which we have already determined to be the labrum (/b.) The entire mass differs from the other portions of the embryo by being of an opaline and less trans- parent appearance. It is formed by an aggregation of exceedingly minute cells that appear to cohere closely together; these lobes appear to be con- tinuous with a great central mass that extends from one extremity of the animal to the other. Soon we perceive some pigment cells forming a small, dark, irregular stripe deep within the anterior lobes, a, and by its arrange- ment apparently separating off a portion of the great opaline mass. Chl VIE, fig. 5.) This stripe of pigment is the early or incipient condition of the great black cornea that is so conspicuous an object in all young Crustacea. At the same period, near the opposite extremity of the ovum a small and irregular pulsation may be observed. This is the position of the future heart. At first the pulsation is very slow, feeble, and irregular; a small corpuscular body may be seen jerked forward and backward within a small sacular space or hollow, after unequal intervals of rest. After a time a solitary corpuscle is seen to burst through an opening in the walls of the sac. This at distant intervals is repeated, and after a time more frequently, until in a day or two the throb of the sac becomes more con- stant, the presence of the corpuscles more numerous, and the flow of them increasingly more regular and continuous, The vitellus has now decreased in size, but not to any very considerable extent externally, but is gradually decreasing internally. At the opposite extremity to the anterior lobes of the embryo, the margin of the vitellus may be observed as having broken into a series of very even cells (Pl. VIL. fig. 6), transparent in colour and regular in position, forming two or three very decided rows, until they gradually disappear in the undeveloped structure of the vitellus. - The external surface of these several rows of transparent cells appears (Pl. VIL. fig. 6) to be enclosed by a membrane of extreme tenuity, that is evidently connected with and forms the outer walls of the alimentary canal, al. The marginal cells appear to build up the fibrous structure of the walls, while certain small particles of granular waste (gw) matter fall into the central passage. Here they exist as foreign bodies of not any large amount, and lie enclosed within a cavity of their own making ; 208 REPORT— ! 878. within this cavity the small particles of opaque irregular granulose matter move forwards and backwards with an uneven movement corresponding to an irregular contraction of the walls of the alimentary canal. When this organism is so far advanced as to extend to theregion beneath the heart, it exists continuously to the terminal extremity of the pleon, and the great dorsal artery, da, may be distinguished leading directly from the heart to the terminal extremity of the animal, just beneath the dermal surface of the embryo as it lies in close contact with the chorion of the egg. The heart lies just beneath the dorsal posterior extremity of the carapace, the posterior and lateral margin of which, mc, traverses the animal just behind the heart in a slightly waved line to the eye. The antenna» have a distinctly appendicular appearance, and reach beyond the three or four succeeding pairs of lobes, and terminate, one, b, in a single pointed branch, the other, ¢, in two branches terminating in a serrated extremity. The oral appendages have not much departed from the lobular condi- tion, but three other pairs, which appeared behind them, have enlarged and are rapidly increasing and become double-branched. At the base of these appendages the great opaline mass, ng, may be seen extending, being apparently doubled on itself, just behind the last pair exhibited, but in reality following the inflection of the ventral surface of the folded embryo. This continuous opaline mass may now readily be determined to be the embryonic condition of the nervous ganglia. , The several parts from this time rapidly and regularly progress in the development of their structure. The ophthalmic lobes gradually appear to increase in condensation, every cell exhibiting a distinct but not very opaque nucleus. The larger and rounder cells are nearer the periphery, those that are deeper become compressed into angular shapes, while those that are nearest the cornea arrange themselves in columnar masses, most distinct towards their base. The antenne lie folded backwards along the margin of the carapace. The mandible is directed inwards, and is invariably a single lobe, while the two succeeding oral appendages are bilobed, with a tendency to break up into more divisions. (Pl. VIL, fig. 7.) The development of the pleon is completed, as far as its external and internal parts are apparent, at the period when the development of the heart is advanced go that it is enabled to pulsate. The remainder of the period necessary for incubation appears to be devoted to the completion of the anterior appendages, and that of the internal viscera. (Pl. VIL, fig. 8). The vitellus is continuous with the development of the animal, and exists in an inverse ratio with that of the growth of the embryo. When it is entirely converted, the growing form has progressed as far as it is capable through internal forces. To add to its further development, it is necessary that it should obtain a fresh stimulus from agencies beyond its own organization. Its vitality has advanced as far as it is capable, and it forces its way by the rupture of the egg-case into other conditions. As a free animal, the brephalus exists, as I have shown before, in various forms, which are probably dependent upon the length of time that the embryo remains in the ovum. Forextended observation appears to demonstrate that it quits the ovum of various genera in almost every stage of its embryonic growth. ON THE EXAMINATION OF TWO CAVES NEAR TENBY. 209 EXPLANATION OF THE PLATES. PLATE V. Fig. 1. Nauplius (Brephalus) of Peneus. (After Fritz Miller.) 2. Metanauplius of Peneus. (After Fritz Miller.) 3. Protozowa of same. (After Fritz Miller.) » 4. Nauplius (Brephalus) of Euphausia. (After Metschnikof.) 5. Zowa (Brephalus) of Macrura (Crangon vulgaris). 6. Zoxa (Brephalus) of Anomura (Galathee). PLATE VI. . Zowa (Brephalus) of Anomura (Dromia falaz). . Zoxa (Brephalus) of Anomura (Porcellana longicornis). . Zowxa (Brephalus) of Brachyura (Trapezia). . Zora (Brephalus) of Brachyura (Gelassimus). . Megalopa (Brephalus) of Macrura (Astacus fluviatilis). PLATE VII. Fig. 1. Ovum of Palemon recently excluded. » 2. Ovum showing incipient stage of embryonic existence. », 3. Ovum showing the presence of the three pairs of lobes that represent,’ a, the eyes and, J, first and c, second, antennz: as well as the labium and caudal extremity. . Same still further advanced, with four pairs of lobes, d, e, f, g, added that represent the future oral appendages. . The same still further advanced, showing those which represent the: future Gnathopoda, h and z. . Section showing the forming of the embryonic heart, At, alimentary canal, al, and ventral nervous cord, ng. . Embryo approaching completion. . Embryo previous to quitting the ovum. Ot oo bo > ans a on Cd Report of a Committee consisting of Professor Ro.ieston, Major- General Lane Fox, Professor Busk, Professor Boyp Dawxtns, Dr. Joun Evans, and Mr. F. G. Hitton Price, appointed for the pur- pose of examining Two Caves containing human remains, in the neighbourhood of Tenby. OPERATIONS were commenced in the way of the exploration of the “ Little Hoyle” Cave, Longbury Bank, parish of Penally, near Tenby, on Monday,. July 22, 1878, and were continued during that week and upon the ensuing Monday. It will be well to begin our report by a summary of the results which we have attained, and in the second place to give in detail the facts upon which our general conclusions have been based. The two caves which we here examined are contained in a peninsula of mountain-limestone known as “ Longbury Bank,” bounded on either side: by a valley which unites with its fellow at the bluffly-ending N.H. ex- tremity of the “bank.” If we compare the levels hereafter given with the facts spoken to by the raised beaches along this coast, and by other observations we cannot doubt that Longbury Bank was once, and that in no very remote geological period, washed on either side by the sea, ented much the same general appearance as some of the still so : P 210 is REPORT—1878. conditioned banks in the neighbourhood of Pembroke. Of the two caves examined by us, one contained no objects of special interest, and the other had been previously investigated by other explorers, viz., the Rev. H. H. Winwood, of Bath (see ‘Cave Hunting,’ by Professor Boyd Dawkins, F.R.S., p. 183, and ‘ British Mammalia,’ Memoirs Palont. Society, 1878, p- xxi), and Mr. Edward Laws, of Tenby (see ‘Journal of Anthropo- logical Institute,’ August 1877). A very considerable segment, however, of this latter cave had been left unexamined, and it has been by the ex- amination of this undisturbed portion of the cave, and by the clearing out and investigation of the contents of all the rest of the cave, and comparison of them with the specimens previously obtained and most liberally put at our disposal for this purpose by Mr. Edward Laws, that we have been able to come to the following results. The cave in question, known in the neighbourhood as “ Little Hoyle,” in contradistinction to a much larger cavern close by, known as ‘“ Hoyle’s Mouth,” may be divided roughly into two main segments, one beginning with a large mouth opening northwards, and extending from that mouth in a direction S. and with a sharp slope upwards up to a point distant 25 feet from the mouth; the other of about 16 feet in length, dipping downwards from that point in a §.E. direction, to communicate by a narrow hole with a wide cave mouth on the S.H. side of the bank in which bones of man, bear, and ox had been previously found by Mr. Laws. This second segment of the cave had underlaid one of those “initiatory areas of depression,” to use the phraseology of the late Professor Phillips (see ‘Report of British Association,’ Bath Meeting, 1864, p. 63-64), which ultimately lead, and here had led, to the breaking-in of the cave’s roof, and which might here be spoken of in the phraseology of the county as a “sink” or “soaker.” It was filled up to a depth of nearly 10 feet with fragments of limestone, and made earth containing bones of men, domestic animals, foxes, rabbits, and oyster and limpet shells. We may speak of it hereafter as the ‘“‘segment of depression.” This “segment of depression’’ had been scarcely touched by any ex- plorers previously to ourselves. The longer segment of the cave, opening northwards, may be spoken of as the “north cave;’’ and a comparatively low diverticulum 16 feet long, branching off from it to the east, and widening from 3 feet to 10 feet for about 9 feet of its length, we may speak of as the “east chamber.’ This last we found by means of smoke to communicate through a narrow flue, with a small flat surface near the top of bank, which was potentially an ‘‘area of depression,” but had actually been a fox-earth. Having in mind the levels and communications of the several parts of this cave, and considering in connection with them the relative proportions and conditions in which the contents of the cave, viz., (1) breccia and stalagmite, (2) red cave-earth, (3) black earth mixed with angular stones, (4) worked flint and other implements, (5) fragments of pottery, (6) ashes, and (7) bones of men and of beasts, pleistocene and other, found in the different segments of the cave, we are, on the whole, of opinion that though the main or north portion of the cave was used by man for purposes of habitation in times at least as early as those in which the brown bear (Ursus Arctos) was still living in this country, the part of the cave in which the greater part of human remains were found, viz., the ‘segment of depression,” has come to con- tain those remains simply by the falling in of its roof, and of a burial- place which had existed over it whilst it was yet only an “initiatory area ON THE EXAMINATION OF TWO CAVES NEAR TENBY. “211 of depression.” We are further of opinion that at no geologically recent time previous to that of our clearing ont of the cave can any very free intercommunication have existed between these two portions of it, at least at times when they were above the level of the sea; for the traces, at least those which are unmistakeable and unambiguous, of its habitation at one time by man and at another by pleistocene animals, are confined to its north- ern portion, which it is difficult to think they would have been if its two portions had been in open communication with each other; though the north cave is intrinsically as at present, and must have been always, better suited for the purpose in question. We have not found any evidence in this cave of man’s having been a contemporary of the extinct pleistocene animals. The remains indeed of these animals themselves consist mainly of comparatively small fragments, and are representative merely of much larger quantities which were washed out of it by the sea in some later occupancies of its interior, or may have been otherwise removed. There can be little doubt that, though man used the “north cave” for purposes of habitation, the area above the south part of it was not used except for purposes of interment. Otherwise, more relics of the articles for daily use in life would have been found in that segment. But we have no evidence to show that the first use of the “north cave” for habitation may not have been even long anterior in date to the first use of the other area for interment. Nearly all the human bones, whether of the skull, limbs, or trunk, which were found by us in this cave, came from the previously undisturbed space in the “segment of depression;” some few, however, were found externally to the north entrance of the cave, and must, ex hypothesi above stated, have been passed down the whole length of the slope constituted by the “north cave.’’ Nearly all, again, of the human skull-bones found by Mr. Edward Laws (‘Journal Anth. Institute,’ Aug. 1877) were lying close together, near the southern extremity of the north cave, where its upward sloping floor reaches its summit and becomes continuous with that of the ‘‘segment of depression.’’ In other words, nearly all the haman bones found in this cave were in positions into which they might, as the sections show, have been thrown or rolled if they had been lying on the roof of the ‘‘ segment of depression,” when that roof fell in, and, as the depth from the present natural surface round the ‘‘segment of depression” down to the red cave-earth at the bottom of it may be taken as being from 12 to 14 feet, we have here a fall sufficient to account at once for the frag- mentary condition of the human and other bones found in this space, and for the space over and within which they were distributed or dispersed. Hz hypothesi, these bones would be showered down upon a watershed-like line of demarcation between the “north cave” and the “segment of depression,” and scattered in either direction, much as is the sand in an inverted hour-glass. In some cases a few bones such as the upper cervical _vertebree and some of the cranial bones would retain their natural rela- tions of apposition, especially at the circumference under the cave walls ; in others they would be widely separated; and the long bones would _ in almost every case be broken into longer or shorter segments. This was actually the state of the case; a state not explicable on the hypothesis of their having been introduced, as bones must so often be held to have been, by water-carriage, to say nothing of the impossibility of the feeding- ground, represented by the upper surface of the bank having been large enough to furnish sufficient water for such flotation. P2 212 REPORT—1 878. Weare not aware that this explanation of the presence of human bones mixed with those of domesticated animals in a cave by the gradual or sudden descent into it of such bones from a superimposed interment is necessitated by the phenomena of any other cave; it is obvious enough, however, that the concave surface presented by an “ initiatory area of depression’ would be very likely to suggest itself as a convenient site for such a purpose to any race of men who might be sufficiently free at once from the conventionalities of civilised life, and from the superstitions of savage life, and might be glad to take an easy way of burying their dead out of their sight. It must also he plain that no mode of burial, whether practised by civilised or by savage men, would by itself account for the scattering through so many (12-13) feet in depth of so many human bones, of so many (9-11) individuals, and this in the absence of any undisturbed burial of an entire skeleton or of a burnt body. If the hypothesis of a number of interments having been let down into the ‘‘depression segment”? will account for the presence of human bones in that portion of the Longbury Bank Cave, the great abundance of certain domesticated animals, viz., of the goat and cow, and the presence of the pig and horse, as also of edible shell-fish—limpets, oysters, and winkles—in smaller quantities, in the northern or larger portion of the cave, as also the discovery in it and upon its natural floor of the ashes of a fire-place, must be taken to prove that the main portion of the cave was used as a human habitation. Some little weight, but not very much, may also be given to the fact that of the few fragments of pottery and bone implements found inside the cave, all were found either in this part of the cave or on the surface elsewhere; and that of the worked stone im- plements, all but the single specimen found in the ‘depression segment” came also from the north cave. It would have been strange if this cave had not been employed for purposes of habitation by some one or more of the tribes of the neighbourhood, who must have become acquainted with it in some one or more of the periods in which it was, owing to one of the up- heavals which have taken place along this coast, left as comparatively dry and commodious as it is at present. The easily available upward sloping entrance, admitting of refuse being got rid of without much trouble, and the height of the roof of this portion of the cave as well as the very considerable ‘floor space” free from stalagmitic drip which it must always since the glacial period have possessed in eras of upheaval, put this portion of the cave at great advantage for dwelling purposes as com- pared with the “segment of depression.” And this advantage appears to have made itself evident to the pleistocene lower animals, as well as to neolithic and later man. For though some not inconsiderable amount of pleistocene remains, notably bones gnawed by hyenas, fragments of teeth of rhinoceros, and large if not always identifiable fragments from the large bones of that or other animals of similar bulk, were found in the north cave; these animals were not represented elsewhere in the cave. Further, it is highly probable that the north cave and the segment of depression may at all previous periods have been connected by but a small passage, the fragments from the roof broken off by the glacial cold or by the shocks of earthquakes having been accumulated in a great mass on the water-shed-like line of demarcation between them, and so having rendered access from the one to the other difficult. The opening of the north cave into the segment of depression is, from the top of the arch of the cave down to the natural bottom, five feet in height; and on the east side of ON THE EXAMINATION OF TWO CAVES NEAR TENBY. 213 the opening there stands a mass of stalagmitic breccia three feet in height, and débris may very probably have been piled up in this place to a still higher level than this. A fissure in the junction of the two parts of the cave which still exists may have furnished an easy route for their descent. It is of importance to note that the two portions of the cave appear to have differed in function both in earlier and later times. The bones of the pleistocene animals found in this cave were limited strictly to the northern portion of it; the same may be said of the ashes, and, with the exception constituted by a single worked flint, of the implements of man’s manufacture; and in this portion of the cave, whilst a very large quantity of the bones of domesticated animals was found, only a few human bones were discovered, the number of which is not greater than what the scattering northwards and downwards which the falling in of the roof of the depression segment, subsequently eked out by occasional causes such as the interference of men or of burrowing animals, foxes, rabbits, and badgers would adequately account for. On the other hand, whilst the majority of all the human bones were discovered within or imme- diately adjacent to the periphery of the segment of depression, the bones of domesticated animals found within it were not more in number than might be accounted for by the hypothesis of their having been the relics of funeral feasts, a view which their being intermingled with the human remains, as they would be if accumulated at successive interments, tends . to confirm. It may, indeed, be considered a matter for surprise that any pleistocene bones or teeth were left in the cave when we consider its level and the slopes of its floor; but the few that were left, and its possible exposure to the denuding influences of a pluvial period, it may be seen, might be preserved from being washed out by lodgment in the pockets and an- fractuosities along the sinuous walls of the cave. With reference to the period at which the owners of the human re- mains may be supposed to have lived, whether in the Stone, the Bronze, or the Iron age, the existence of the sunken forest at Westward Ho, on the opposite side of the Bristol Channel, forbids us to forget that it may have very well been some time later than the commencement of the neolithic period when the sea last encroached upon and overwhelmed areas in this district tenanted by stone-using men. And as such an invasion would have left the contents of this cave in a very different state from that in which we found them, even though no traces of metal of any kind were found inside any part of this cave, we must not suppose that we are justified in placing the date either of the men buried above or of the men who inhabited this cave far back in that - period. But further. Two of the pieces of pottery found, either inside or in the talus just outside the north cave, appeared to be of the same style as one which was found in a round barrow, containing a cremation urn and burnt bones and flint chips, on the Ridgeway Hill, immediately _ above the Longbury Bank; and this may be supposed to suggest, though it by no means proves, that the Longbury Bank cave-inhabitants were, like the Ridgeway tumulus builders, of the Bronze age. Thirdly, in the talus outside the north entrance, a spindle whorl made out of the bottom of a jar of Samian ware, like two found in Dowker Bottom cave, in Yorkshire (see Professor Boyd Dawkins’s ‘Cave Hunting,’ p. 113), was found; and half of a saucer-shaped vessel of the same material showing signs of ornamentation was found on the surface of the area of depres- 214 REPORT—1878. sion by Mr. Laws, lying by a piece of iron slag, the only piece of metal- work found in or near this cave. Now these specimens would bring the date of the inhabitation of the cave, if they had been found in situ within it, down to a period as late as that in which the inhabitants had oppor- tunities at least of procuring articles of Roman manufacture. There is other evidence to show that the date of the burials on the roof of this cave may have been no earlier than such a date; but the finding of this piece of pottery in the externally placed talus does not absolutely prove the date of its being inhabited to have been so. But as regards the rela- tive age of the human interments and of the human habitation of this cave, it is of cardinal importance to note that two thin, flattish, fine- grained red fragments of apparently Romano-British pottery were found, in company with the human bones, deep down in the “depression seg- ment.” No other articles of human manufacture, however, except one worked flint, though many remains of domestic animals, were found with them. Still, it is difficult to think that these fragments were not of the same date as the human bones found with them. On the other hand, in the north cave and on the natural bottom, known locally as ‘“ Rabb,” were found the ashes and fire-place already spoken of; and in the red cave-earth, just inside the mouth of the north cave and beneath the black mould, were found a flint chip, a horn-stone scraper, and a bone needle, the juxtaposition of which is not without significance. The finding of the remains of several dogs, one old and several young ones, so closely mixed up with the human remains at the line of commnu- nication between the north cave and the segment of depression as to suggest that the two sets of remains had been buried and had fallen down together, and also the finding of a worked flint, and the absence of metal in that segment, are phenomena usual or universal in neolithic interments. But they have been all observed in interments even of the iron age. On the other hand, the finding of the bones of the brown bear (Ursus Arctos) in the black mould of the north cave, and notably also in the east chamber, in company with, and similarly conditioned as to colour and preservation to, the bones of man and of domestic animals, appears to show with some probability that these latter remains should not take date later than at least the time, about 900 years back, when this bear ceased to infest Wales. We have, then, in the stone and bone implements found in the north portions of this cave some tolerable evidence to the effect that it was inhabited by man in probably late neolithic times. And whilst the pottery found in the ‘‘depression segment,” in company with the human bones, appears to show that they, or, at any rate, the immense majority of them, cannot be referred to an earlier than the Romano-British period, the remains of the bear give us a certain datum line of at least 900 years distance away from us as the latest period to which they can with any probability be referred. We append a short summary of the results obtained from examina- tion of all the bones obtained from this cave, whether obtained by Mr. Edward Laws or ourselves, after they had been washed, cleaned, and otherwise prepared. Some 160 or so fragments of bones and teeth referable either to rhinoceros or elephant were found scattered throughout the northern segments of the cave. We have not been able to find that they were in positions apart frem the other bones of more recent daté, and usually of ON THE EXAMINATION OF TWO CAVES NEAR TENBY. 215 different textural condition, belonging to domestic animals, to man, and to certain fere nature still existing either in Great Britain or in Conti- nental Europe which will be next specified. The steep slope of the part of the cave in which they were found would render the disturbance of them, and the interminglement of them with subsequent importations an easy matter, whether the disturbing agent was the sea in a period of subsidence, or rain in a pluvial period, or, finally, man himself in his successive occupations of the cave. No remains of hyznas’were found by us amongst these ‘palzolithic bones; but the marks of gnawing, which are conspicuous enough upon many of these bones, are so closely similar to those produced by the teeth of this carnivore elsewhere, that it is difficult to think they are not to be ascribed to it; and the more so as in other caves in this dis- trict the hyzna is very abundantly represented both by bones and by album grecum. Most of the bones referable to the mammoth or rhinoceros are spongy and waterworn; some combining the traces of gnawings with those of waterwear. Some, on the other hand, have received much accession to their weight and solidity, and have also become curiously polished on their exterior by exposure to calcareous drip. In the north cave and in its eastern diverticulum the remains of bear,, roe, red deer, eagle, and black grouse were found, all being animals which, without being extinct in Europe, or being foreign in strictness of language to this part of it, would yet not be very likely to find their way into this cave in the present day. Of the bear species, Ursus Arctos, three individuals are represented by the bones and teeth found here. Thronghont the length and breadth of the cave, from its communica- tion with the south cave to its northern opening, and in the talus lying outside this opening, were found bones of domesticated animals, goat, small ox, dog, pig. In the talus outside the north entrance some pelvic bones were found, which I think are sheep and not goat bones. In the same locality a nearly perfect skull of a goat was found. Some of the domesticated animal bones appear to have been but of recent date, but a great number bear marks in the way of weathering and of staining of a very considerable antiquity. They represent breeds of small size. The horse is, though but scantily, represented in the collection from Longbury Cave; and the wild boar we have failed to recognise here. The badger’s, the fox’s, and the rabbit’s abound among the bones col- lected here. The fox’s represent a small variety. As regards the human remains, the great majority of them were found in the segment of depression or in the southward termination of the north cave immediately adjoining and continuous with it. Most of the human bones found by Mr. Laws were in the latter locality; most of those found by us were found in the former; but, either by Mr. Laws’or by us, human bones or teeth were, though but in very small numbers, found in every part of the cave, not excluding even the south cave. The numbers of the several sets of fragmentary human bones may be given with some approach to accuracy as follows:—In the entire cave, exclusive of the depression segment, about 150 fragments of more or less perfect humax bones were found; from the depression segment alone about 350 frag- ments were collected ; into the talus outside the north entrance some 6 to 10 fragments of a child’and of an adult had found their way ; a human tooth was found in the east cave; and a piece of a skull and of a lower 216 REPORT—1878. jaw were found in the mouth of the south cave. ‘These numbers of course very strongly support the view that these bones fell in from a burial place corresponding to the segment of depression ; and that the accident inseparable from such a tumbling down, and the subsequent scattering inseparable from the presence of the burrowings of badgers and foxes, account for the scattering of the comparatively insignificant num- ber of bones found at any great distance from that area. It is instructive also to put on record the fact that whilst a larger number of calvarial bones was ‘found in the depression segment, which we suppose to have underlaid the place of interment of the human remains, than in all the rest of the entire cave, only three more or less fragmentary lower jaws were found in company with them; whilst by Mr. Laws five more or less nearly complete lower jaws were found in the north, and a large frag- ment of a sixth in the south cave. The paleontologist will find the fre- quency of the separation of the lower jaw from the rest of the cranium, with which he is so familiar, illustrated by this fact. We have absolute proof in the nine lower jaws just spoken of that no less than nine human beings have their skeletons represented in the collection made from this cave. Two fragmentary representatives of lower jaws found—one in the talus outside the north entrance, the other in the middle of the north caye—correspond probably to two other skeletons, but it is just possible that they may be parts of some one or other of the nine demonstrably distinct mandibles. Of these nine indi- viduals, no less than five were males in or beyond the middle period of life, one belonged to a woman in late life, one to a person about the age of puberty, with the wisdom tooth as yet uncut, one to a child with the first two molars just cut, one to a child with none but the milk teeth in place. Three more or less perfect calvaria have been reconstructed out of the remains collected by Mr. Laws and ourselves; one from the cranial bones found in the north cave, two from those found in the depression segment. All of the crania are dolichocephalic; and one, a male skull, that which came from the north cave, ‘‘ mecistocephalic,” in Professor Huxley’s language, with a cephalic index of 69, and with the pear-shaped contour when viewed from above, due to rapid tapering from the level of the parietal tubera forwards, which has so often been spoken of since the writings of Professor Daniel Wilson as characteristic of many skulls from the earliest sepultures of Great Britain. There is no doubt that this is a very ancient form of skull, but the well-known tenacity and per- sistence of such ancient forms forbids us to use it as an evidence as to date. Of the other two, one belonged undoubtedly to a man, the other to a woman; and neither, though dolichocephalic, are exaggeratedly so, as is the case with the first-named of the three. The long bones are all more or less fragmentary; they do not pre- sent any peculiarities specially worthy of notice ; the femora have not their lineee asperce greatly developed, though in one or two the upper portion of the shaft is somewhat flattened from before backwards in the origin of the insertion of the gluteus maximus ; the tibize are not platyenemic ; and neither these nor any other of the bones give the notion of their owners being much above or below the average size and height. In a word, they have not the peculiarities of prehistoric bones. The human bones present much the Same appearance as to staining, wear and tear, and weathering as the bones of bear and of domesticated animals found with ON THE PHENOMENA OF STATIONARY TIDES IN THE ENGLISH CHANNEL. 217 them. All three sets of bones alike differ from those belonging to the paleolithic period found here in being, except in a few instances, free from interstitial calcareous deposit, and from marks of gnawing except by recent rodents. In one instance, some human bones were found imbedded in reddish- white breccia. This breccia had been formed in several places along the east wall of the north into masses about 3 feet to 34 feet in height, which stood out against the wall like brackets. One of these, just 15 feet from the north entrance, had embedded on its upper surface, which was about 3 feet 10 inches above the natural floor of the cave, the lower ends of two human femora, which thus came to occupy just such a position as they would be likely to do if picked up from the floor by some human inhabitant who was incommoded by their presence and placed on the top of the shelf-like bracket which was in the process of being added to by drip. With these two human bones are concreted some bones of frogs or toads, and ata depth of one foot a humerus of a roe, Cervus capreolus, was found similarly embedded. Itis of importance to note that these brackets of breccia do not seem to be remnants of a floor which has disappeared from between the side-walls of the cave; no corresponding deposits at least are observable along the opposite wall on the west side, and, as is well known, the stalagmite-forming drip, being regulated by the conformation of the limestone, is very often anything but symmetrically arranged. Report of the Committee, consisting of Professor Sir WILLIAM Tuomson, Mr. W. Frovps, Professor Osporne Reynoups, Captain Dovetas Gatton, and Mr. James N. SHooiprep (Secretary), ap- pointed for the purpose of obtaining information respecting the Phenomena of the Stationary Tides in the English Channel and inthe North Sea; and of representing to the Government of Portugal and the Governor of Madeira, that, in the opinion of the British Association, Tidal Observations at Madeira or other islands in the North Atlantic Ocean would be very valuable, with the view to the advancement of our knowledge of the tides in the Atlantic Ocean. Tue Committee beg to report that last year the French Association for the Advancement of Science, at their Meeting at Havre, which took place subsequently to that at Plymouth, having had the subject of these simultaneous tidal observations in the English Channel and in the North Sea brought before them by the Secretary of the Committee, cordially approved of the intended action of this Committee, and resolved to urge upon the French Government that any observations required upon the _ French coast should be undertaken by its engineers. At the commencement of the present year, the French Government undertook to do this, in accordance with a programme of simultaneous observations, approved of by the Chairman of the Committee. The Belgian Government likewise offered its co-operation at Ostend ; and in Holland the observations were kindly undertaken by the authorities 218 REPORT—-1 878. at the mouth of the North Sea Canal and at Flushing; while on this side of the Channel, extending from Portland to Yarmouth, the port and other authorities at the points selected also undertook the duties of making the necessary observations. The results have not yet been all received, and they are not in a suffi- ciently forward state to be presented at this meeting. In consequence of the great importance of accurate permanent tidal records at Dover being available, the Chairman of the Committee urged upon the Warden of the Cinque Ports, Lord Granville, that a self- registering tide gauge should beerected at Dover; a proposal which met with his Lordship’s cordial approval and support. The Board of Trade have further consented to grant a suitable site for the erection of a self-registering gauge on the Admiralty Pier, and have undertaken to defray the cost thereof. The exact form best adapted tothe place is at present under considera- tion, but it is confidently hoped that before long a self-registering tide gauge will be permanently at work at this very important locality. The subject of tidal observations at Madeira was brought under the notice of H.M. Government by the Chairman of the Committee. A communication has lately been received from the Foreign Office, saying that H.M. Minister at Lisbon, having urged the matter upon the Portuguese Government, “has received the assurance that it will gladly adopt the suggestion of the British Association and establish a tidal gauge at Funchal.” In consequence of the results of the tidal observations already under- taken not being in a sufficiently advanced state for presentation at this meeting, the Committee request to be reappointed, and also that £10 be placed at their disposal. Appendix. Board of Trade, (Harbour Department), Whitehall Gardens, 8.W., July 11th, 1878. Sir,—With reference to a letter, dated the 3lst May last, addressed to this department by Sir William Thomson, LL.D., in his capacity of Chairman of the Committee of the British Association, ‘on Tidal Observa- tions in the English Channel, &c.,” calling attention to the want of a tide gauge at Dover, and enquiring whether the Board of Trade would be disposed to undertake the expense of placing a continuous self-recording instrument at the Government pier, where there is already a tide-well, I am directed to acquaint you that this Board have received the sanc- tion of the Lords Commissioners of Her Majesty’s Treasury to the expenditure for this purpose of a sum not exceeding one hundred and five pounds (£105) (the estimated cost as given by Sir W. Thomson), and I am to state that your Committee are at liberty to take the necessary steps for fixing the gauge. Iam to add that Mr. Drace, the Resident Engineer and Officer of this Board at Dover, has been instructed to give such facilities in the matter as he is able to afford. ‘ I am, Sir, Your obedient servant, C. Cectt TREVOR. J. N. Shoolbred, Esq., 3 Westminster Chambers, S.W. ON INSTRUMENTS FOR MEASURING THE SPEED OF SHIPS. 219 Foreign Office, August 9th, 1878. Sm,—With reference to my letter of the 7th inst., I am directed by the Marquis of Salisbury to transmit to you herewith a copy of a telegram which has been received from Her Majesty’s Minister at Lisbon on the subject of the establishment of a tidal gauge at Funchal. I am, Sir, Your most obedient, humble servant, JULIAN PAUNCEFOTE. J. N. Shoolbred, Esq., 3 Westminster Chambers. (Mr. Morier to Lord Salisbury.) Lisbon, August 9th, 1878, 1.18 p.m. I have received the assurance that the Portuguese Government will gladly adopt the suggestion of the British Association and establish a tidal gauge at Funchal. The official note on the subject cannot be sent for some days,as Senhor Corro is absent. Second Report of the Committee, consisting of Professor Sir Winuiam Tuompson, Major-General Srracuey, Captain Dovcias Gatton, Mr. G. F. Duacon, Mr. Rogers Freip, Mr. E. Roserrs, and Mr. J. N. Soonsrep (Secretary), appointed for the purpose of considering the Datuwm-level of the Ordnance Survey of Great Britain, with a view to its establishment on a surer foundation than hitherto, and for the tabulation and comparison of other Datum-marks. Tur Committee, in their Report of last year, dealt with the question of some uncertainties which existed as to the position of the Ordnance datum-level, and of its relative position to other local datum- marks in Liverpool. On the present occasion the Committee beg to report that alist of local datum-marks, and the connexion of each with the Ordnance datum, isin course of preparation. They beg to be reappointed, with the grant of £10 (not drawn) to enable them to complete the list of local datum-marks. Report of the Committee on Instruments for Measuring the Speed of Ships, consisting of Mr. W. Froupz, Mr. F. J. Bramwe.1, Mr. A. E. Firercuer, Rev. E. L. Bertuoy, Mr. Jamus R. Napier, Mr. C. W. Merririenp, Dr. C. W. Siemens, Mr. H. M. Brunet, Mr. J. N. Suootsrep (Secretary), Professor Jamis THomson, and Professor Sir Witiiam THomson. . Tur Committee regret to say, that the Chairman has been unable to complete the second series pf experiments with the several instru- ments for measuring the speed of ships. _ The Committee therefore beg to be reappointed, and that the grant of £50 (which has not been drawn) be renewed. 220 REPORT—1878. Report of a Committee appointed for the purpose of further de- veloping the investigations into a Common Measure of Value in Direct Taxation, the Committee consisting of the Right Hon. J. G. Husparp, M.P., Mr. Caapwicx, M.P., Mr. Morey, M.P., Dr. Farr, Sir George CamMpseLL, M.P., Mr. Hatuert, Prof. JEvons, Mr. Newmarcna, Mr. Saann, Mr. Macneret Carrp, Mr. StepHEn Bourne, Prof. Leons Luyv1, Mr. Hexwoop, and Mr. Hauuzrr (Sec.) I. Your Committee presented to the British Association a first Report of the results of their inquiry on this subject in 1876. In this inquiry, following ordinary usage, they took income as the basis of their examina- tion. They found, however, that in sundry proposed systems of common valuation and assessment on this basis, incomes were sometimes considered in themselves independently, sometimes in relation also to their owners. The first consideration was directed to the real nature and constitution of income, as the annual value, product, profits, or receipts of, or from, some given source, whether land, labour, or capital. The other considera- tion was directed to the income’s relation to personal circumstances, or in other words, to the owner’s position in the scale of riches and poverty as determined by his possession. Assessment on the former principle would vary with the positive value of the income, on the latter it would vary with the value of the income qualified by the individual condition of the owner—his individual tenure for example or his individual necessities. £1,000 a year from land held on a short tenure or subject to large family claims, would on the latter view be differently assessable to the same income held on a long tenure or not subject to these claims, whilst on the former and sounder view the two assessments would be the same. The Committee in dealing with the subject referred to them, confine their attention to the income’s positive value. Positive value is the professed basis of the present Income Tax, and were it possible to adjust an Income Tax to differences of individual tenure and necessities, as well as to differences of positive value, some uniform method of comparing and measuring the positive values of incomes would still be essential. It is impossible to estimate the relative effect of incomes upon different in- dividuals without first knowing their values considered in themselves. II. But the equal assessment of incomes according to positive value demands a common measure of valne, and legislation, in the absence of such common measure, must act on a mere nominal equality which often involves it in a real and gross injustice. £1,000 a year from perishing Jabour,—that for instance of a barrister or physician,—is taxed equally with £1,000 a year from permanent Jand. The question then presented itself, ‘‘ how does the difference between nominal equality and true equality, or as it might be called, the difference between nominal income and true income arise, and how is it expressible?’”” The Committee considered that this difference was universally resolvable into the extent to which the production of an income involved the expenditure of its source’s value. Labour, land, houses, and other great sources of income, are more or less consumed, impaired, or diminished—some more, some less,— in producing income, and this varying diminution in the source’s value appears as a more or less enlarged income and makes it of more or less nominal worth. Such nominal income is in fact a mere mixture of true ON A COMMON MEASURE OF VALUE IN DIRECT TAXATION. 221 income and source’s outgoings, and the more the source is impaired in value, the larger is the proportion of these outgoings in its composition, whilst the greater also will be its nominal excess above true income. From these considerations the Committee arrived at the following simple rule of general application :—‘ Deduct from the income as at present returned the outgoings that belong to its production, and the remainder will be its taxable amount.” III. Under such a rule, taxable income would not as at present be land-rent, house-rent, labour-wages, &c., but land-rent minus land- outgoings, house-rent minus house-outgoings, labour-wages minus labour-outgoings, &c. These outgoings are for the most part the sequels of productive wear, tear, and depreciation, involving cost of repairs, maintenance, or replacement either of the source itself or of its value. By their deduction the source’s value considered as a capital or principal, is maintained unimpaired, and the income left which would always bear the same relation to source that interest bears to principal, was called the source’s “interest value,” and was adopted as the common measure of assessment. The plan of the Committee might indeed be shortly summed up as the conversion of sources and incomes generally to the form of principal and interest by uniform deduction of source’s outgoings, and might be indifferently defined as, “Taxation of the Interest value,” ‘‘Non-taxation of the Principal value as Income,” “Bxemption of Essential Outgoings,” three equivalent expressions, each one absolutely involving the other. IV. Incomes in their positive or source aspect as the object of direct assessment and interest value as the assessment’s common measure— such are then the chief conclusions of the last Report. In the present inquiry, keeping this object and this measure distinctly in miad, and keep- ing clear of all purely personal aspects, whether those of personal tenure or of personal ngcessities, the Committee propose to determine more fully the method and practicability of applying this measure to the chief cases of actual Income and to append an approximate schedule of results. V. The rule of procedure in general is evidently that already given for finding interest value, viz., ‘‘ Deduct from the income as at present returned all the outgoings that belong to its production,” or speaking independently of the Income Tax and its returns: “Deduct from the total receipts of any given source, the total cost of producing them, and the difference will be its interest value on taxable income.” This being the rule, all that will be necessary for its particular application will be a knowledge of the receipts, and a knowledge of the outgoings or costs in each case in question. What are the costs to which land, houses, and mines are naturally subject in producing rents and royalties? What are the costs to which ships, machinery, horses, cattle, vehicles, trade- fixtures and furniture, railways, mills, and manufactories, in a word capital whether fixed or circulating, are subject in producing profits ? What are the costs to which labour, whether of offices, of professions, or: of trades is subject in producing salaries, fees, or wages? These costs consist as before stated of the source’s outgoings through work, wear, and tear, and through depreciation in value by age and exhaustibility,. and equally with that of the source’s receipts a knowledge of them is: implied in every comparison of values and is indeed the indispensable condition of all rational accounts. VI. Fortunately, however, the practicability of finding and deducting 222 REPORT—1878. these outgoings, or costs, does not merely rest on the reason of the thing, but in many cases is proved by actual precedent. The Income Tax Act itself allows them in some cases, though it ignores them in others, both recognition and non-recognition being equally haphazard and arbitrary. It was recently stated by the Chancellor of the Exchequer, that deduction for depreciation in ships and railways, though not expressly recognised in law, were practically recognised in the assessment offices. Deprecia- tion in machinery is now added by special enactment, whilst the Law Courts have recently discovered that allowance for depreciation in mines has always been the real though the hitherto hidden meaning of the Act itself. Special clauses of the Act expressly allow cost of repairs and renewals. The immemorial usage of calculating the profits of capital in business, viz., that of valuation of stock at the beginning and end of the business year, and the inclusion of the difference in the profit and loss account, involves a distinct deduction of source’s outgoings, and the Act in so far as it recognises this usage, recognises and allows this de- duction. Moreover in other instances to which the Act is partially or wholly blind, precedents of practicability are not wanting. Deductions from gross annual value, in order to obtain rateable value, have ever been recognised in local taxation, though in the absence of a common measure of yalue, in a variable and uncertain manner. The Metropolis Valuation Act of 1869, “an Act to provide for uniformity in the assessment of rate- able property in the Metropolis,” and the various Valuation Bills proceed- ing from it, are founded upon these deductions, to which they attempt to give a uniform and common basis, and their appended schedules, if not wholly accurate, are valuable precedents for direct taxation generally. In these, lands without buildings are allowed a deduction of 35; with buildings not houses of 7; houses are allowed a deduction varying according to their class from } to 4, mills and manufactories a deduction of 4, &c.: all these deductions representing the expenses to which the several properties are liable, as necessary to “maintain the hereditament in a state to command its rent.” VII. In the case of labour, however, no deductions are allowed either in practice or in legislation, and yet the income from the labour of men is as subject to essential outgoings, costs of maintenance, depreciation, exhaustibility, as the income from houses or from horses. A man’s labour, it is popularly said, is his capital, but if so, it is both a con- sumable and perishable capital. Like the labour of a horse, to take the previous example, it undergoes a daily exhaustion of power that has to be supplied by food. As the horse has to be clothed and stabled, so the productive labourer has to be clothed and housed. As the horse by age undergoes a depreciation of its value, so by age the productive labourer undergoes a similar depreciation, and as the work and value of the horse finally disappears, so does the labour and value of the labourer disappear also. As questions of economic valuation, the cases of the working horse and working man, be his work mental or manual, are precisely analogous, and the outgoings of the labour’s value that are capable of calculation and allowance in one case, are capable of calculation and allowance in the other. The calculation in the case of horses, is the necessary condition of maintaining a business in horses. A job-master, for example, may receive from the hire of a pair of horses worth £200, which he supplies with food, stabling, and attendance, full £200 a year. The Income Tax assessment even, would scarcely venture to charge such ON A COMMON MEASURE OF VALUE IN DIRECT TAXATION. 223 a capitalist with an income of £200 a year for each pair of horses thus let; he would be allowed a deduction for the food, stabling, and hired attendance. But the horses in the course of half a dozen years are worn out, and have to be replaced, and he is allowed a deduction for this expense also, if not in the shape of a fund annually put by for deprecia- tion, at any rate in the shape of cost for resupply of diminished stock. The Income Tax assessment, however, does charge in this manner the labour of the capitalist himself, and thus not only is the man of industry assessed on powers in his possession on which the man of idleness is not assessed at all, but he is assessed on the gross receipts of these powers, whilst their necessary expenditure, with the exception of the small in- surance allowance, is absolutely ignored. VIII. As an individual’s labour is thus a possession of limited and uncertain duration, and subject to an annual expenditure for maintenance, the true mode of valuing its income would be to regard it as a terminable annuity, subject to an annual cost. In this aspect the amount of this annuity would be that of the labour income at present returned, its term the average labour period, and the annual cost that of the labour’s main- tenance. This annual cost, which would in general be expressible as some proportion or percentage of the income, added to the annual fund necessary to replace the capital of the annuity, would be the deduction required for finding the labour’s interest value, or taxable income. With the requisite statistics, the calculation of this deduction is a question of arithmetic. By a witness in the Hume Committee, it was stated as 4 of the present assessable labour income, just as the deduction in mills and manufactories is given as 3, and that of certain classes of houses as 1 of their respective rents, and this, if not the exact truth, must be a close ap- proximation to it. A summary of these deductions is presented in the following schedule, and the general adoption of the single principle they illustrate would secure the immense advantage of a uniform plan of assessment throughout both local and imperial direct taxation. Schedule of an Assessment of Incomes according to their Interest-value, the Principal-value of each Source being maintained by deduction of all _ Essential Outgoings. SOURCES OF INCOME. PROPERTY. . Deduction per cent. or proportion 1, Land. according to presence or absence of buildings | yom 5 to 10 or 2 to 2 2. Houses and buildings, according to class .......... From 16% to 25 or 2 to 4 3. Mines and quarries, according to class ............+++ From 10 to 20 or fi tol 4, Mills and manufactories, including blast and TO ras smelting furnaces and kilns .........ceseeesceceeees 332 or } 5. Moneys invested in Exchequer Bills and Bonds, = Perpetual Annuities, or Loans ............ceece0ee Nil 6. Moneys invested in Terminable Annuities ......... Sufficient to restore capital 7. Railways, Canals, Docks, Tolls, Waterworks, and pt Gasworks ry ccismsenate-sasencisedet -. > !s00 So cascuseecese To\ be detefmined/ K 8, Ships, vehicles, machinery, trade fixtures, horses, decorctngs Gs tea cnakasee caleat stock, and other forms of capital, whether valuation for stock taking and fixed or circulating .........6.. «poceec CORE EEE eee ee ee 224 REPORT—1878. LABOUR. 9. “Professions, Trades, and Offices,” including salaried, agricultural, manufacturing, and Commercial employMeENtsS ...ssccecsereerrereenceeee 50 or $ TX. Where the nominal or gross income is the joint result of property and personal labour, as in all trades, and in many professions, we have first to consider the property income and labour income separately. If the property be valued by the foregoing rules as a principal or capital, it is a truism to say that the interest of the principal will be the interest- value of the property, and that this subtracted from the joint income will give the labour’s nominal income. Deducting the labour’s out- goings from the latter, we have the labonr’s interest-value, which added to the property’s interest-value, makes the total assessable return re- quired. Examples of the rule are given in the first Report. Being merely a rule of valuation it is as legitimately capable of application by the owner of a business, or by his recognised accountant, as any of the rules now ia use, and being thus applied it involves no exposure of his capital or other detail of his business. The following are forms of ordinary account, illustrative of the application of the rule to particular cases. LAND WITHOUT BUILDINGS. Cr. Dr. £ Nominal or gross rent .......+0.066 -» 1000 Deduction for land-outgoings BLS .cccnscecsecccccsvsebsereceseens Land interest-value or taxable INCOME 4iecs.c> 10 10 60 ” ” 40 ” ” 15 66 FZ. spiky DTN No B*hay 20 5 80 ” ” 20 ” ” etc etc. etc. etc. parison of the figures of the second and fourth columns, representing the respective valuations of the same series of incomes by the two measured shows that these valuations are in exact proportion, and shows therefore that at a given rate per cent., the taxation of an income on its interest- value is the same as its taxation on the number of years’ purchase expressing its capital-value. Thus for example in the above table an income of 4 per cent. is worth 25 years’ purchase, and all of it, or 100 per cent., is true interest-value. An income of 8 per cent. is worth 12°5 years’ purchase, and its interest-value is only 50 per cent. of its amount, the other 50 per cent. being outgoings of principal. The figures express- ing the number of years’ purchase of the two incomes, viz., 25 12°5, and the figures expressing their interest-value, viz., 100 and 50, are propor- tionals. So with any other corresponding numbers of the two columns, and generally the two lines of figures, while proportional to each other, have a measurable relation to the line of figures expressing the outgoings. These relations, which strictly follow from the nature of capital and interest, or principal and interest, are important, because though, for reasons stated in the first Report, an interest-value measure as represent- ing the annual increment or actual increase of value, is a better measure of annual taxation than that of capital, yet a knowledge of the capital- value of an income is often a rapid and useful mode of getting at its interest-value. By means of such a table as is here shown, the value in years’ purchase of any income from property. or labour being given, the amount of outgoings to be deducted in order to maintain the source’s principal unimpaired, or the amount of the interest-value, can be at once exhibited. As an outcome of this comparison it may be said that to the three equivalent sides or illustrations of the assessment doctrine of in- comes already given, viz., “Taxation of Interest-value,” ‘“ Non-taxation of Principal as Income,” “Exemption of Essential Outgoings,” we may add what is practically a fourth, viz., ‘Taxation according to their Years’ Purchase,” always provided that a uniformity of basis and application be preserved. ~ ON COMMON MEASURE OF VALUE IN DIRECT TAXATION. 227 XII. It appears to be sometimes thought that the capitalisation of in- comes is equivalent to the conversion of an Income Tax into a Property Tax, ‘This however is not so, An Income Tax, whatever the measure used, always demands an income. A Property Tax, however, would take effect if there were no income. It is indeed the necessary condition of property, having value, to produce income sooner or later, and equal properties in the long run produce equal incomes ; but the advantage of an Income Tax over a Property Tax, is that it falls on the property only when it does produce an income, and in proportion to the amount pro- duced. One of the advantages of a Property Tax over an Income Tax is said to be that of its incidence on certain forms of value not reached by the Income Tax, as for example, lands annually increasing in value in the neighbourhood of growing towns, but yielding no corresponding rent, and also the furniture, &c., of private houses. If true income be in- crement or increase of value it may be fairly questioned whether the annual increase of value in these lands is not true income, and truly liable . to Income Tax. Under the present system, a capital invested in such property year by year increases in value, but pays no Income Tax on the increase, whilst the same capital invested in funds or farms would be annually assessed on its increase. It may be also questioned whether pro- perty in furniture, rightly considered,is not as much property yielding an in- come to its owner as the house which he owns and at the same time inhabits. It has an annual utility, and its value invested in other forms would yield income. Moreover, in this same form, if hired instead of owned, it yields an annual income annually taxable, and it is difficult to see how the fact of the same property being owned by one and used by another, and being owned and used by the same person, can make a difference in the nature of its annual use, value, or product. Questions of this kind, however, belong rather to the province and extension of a direct tax than to its just valuation. XIII. Many of the objections which have been urged against capital- value are probably grounded, not so much ona repugnance to the measure itself, as to the mode in which it has been used, as for example, in re- ference to the subject of tenures pointed out in the last Report. Uni- formity of basis and application, whatever the measure may be, is of the last importance, and the confusion that may attend the use of a true measure was well exemplified in the arguments on the Knowles case, a colliery Income Tax appeal, recently decided in the Court of Exchequer. Inthis important case for Income Tax reform, the plaintiffs, maintaining the principle that real income or profit is the difference between expenditure and receipts, claimed at law a deduction from the taxable receipts of coal mines for the exhaustion of the coal. Among the replies made by the Inland Revenue Office as defendants, was “that if real income be the difference between expenditure and receipts, why should not a person who buys a lease in lands or consols be assessed to the Income Tax on the difference between what he gives for his lease and what he receives from it””—a difference that would practically amount not to the interest-value of the consols or land, but .to the interest-value of his purchase money. The answer is, “real income is the difference between expenditure and re- ceipts, but the analogy of a lease is a fallacious one. In expending money on a lease, you are not, as such, producing an income, nor are you buying that which produces it; you are simply buying incomes already made or to be made independently of your purchase. You are in fact a Q2 228 REPORT— 1878. dealer in incomes, just as you might be a dealer in sugars or teas, or in any other commodity, taxable antecedently to your purchase, and you buy them subject to all their burdens. Your receipts are in this case them- selves incomes, themselves the difference between expenditure and pro- duct, and the tax on them, though charged to the full amount, is a charge on the money that buys them only in the same manner that the tithe is a charge on the purchase money of lands.” The fallacy of refusing a deduction to the products of perishable sources, and the fallacy of claiming a deduction for the terminable tenure of permanent products, are the obverse forms of a financial illusion. Both fallacies arise from the phenomena of transfer. In the former, true capital by transfer appears as income, and is taxed as income; in the latter, true income by transfer appears as capital, and as capital would be exempted. It is this double illusion, ever manifesting itself in investi- gations on the Income Tax, that has probably confused the vision of economists and statesmen, and hitherto rendered abortive all attempts at reform. Whether direct taxation be incident on property or on its pro- ducts—on capital or on income—for a series of years matters little ; but it is monstrous that a tax which professes to be either a Property or an Income Tax, should treat capital as if it were income, or income as if it were capital. XIV. It sometimes appears to be thought that after all there is little practical difference whether taxation be levied on gross income or on net, on the higher or lower level as it is called. ‘A certain sum has to be raised, and what matters it whether it be raised as a smaller percentage of a larger sum or as a larger percentage of a smaller one.’’ Doubtless if gross income bore the same relation to net in each case such an argu- ment would be valid, but no such relation exists. The “‘grossness’’ of an income stands for the amount of undeducted expenditure the income contains, and gross incomes are of every degree of “grossness.’ The true net pound—the interest-value pound—is in all cases 20s., but the gross pound is as variable as the nature of sources and the customs of free contract. In land rent the gross pound is legally defined in the Metropolis Valuation Act as 19s., in house rent as varying according to the class of house from 15s. to 17s. 8d., in the rent of mills and manu- factories as 13s. 4d., in the wages of labour, though not yet legally defined, it is probably only 10s. All however are pounds gross, and in an assessment proportioned to gross value like that of the existing Income Tax, are equally assessable. By this mode of reckoning, an Income Tax nominally 5d. in the pound, is indeed for ordinary principal moneys really 5d., but for houses it is in some cases between 6d. and 7d., for mills and manufactories it is 74d., and for labour it probably amounts to 10d. Gross value is thus not a single measure, but is a loose expression including a number of measures, it may be a multitude of measures, pre- senting a conspicuous absence of uniformity of relation both to true value, and to each other. Perhaps the one positive point of community these measurements by “‘ gross”’ value do possess is their inordinate pressure on labour and the products of labour as compared with their pressure on the permanent sources of income. Human labour and the works of human labour have as their distinguishing marks waste and perishability. They essentially constitute the great category of things, quce ipso usu con- sumuntur, but it is “consumability by use” that “gross” value utterly ignores. Between the permanent and the perishable it distinguishes ON COMMON MEASURE OF VALUE IN DIRECT TAXATION. 229 nothing, and human labour in itself, and in its works, in its houses, its mills, its manufactories, are the special victims of this ignorance. XV. To contemplate modes of valuation such as these now employed, as not the mere dicta of individual opinion, but as the accepted conclu- sions of the State and the expression of its established law, would be to despair of truth and justice in direct taxation. If, however, instead of confining our attention to the present position of the valuation question, we regard it in its successive changes and in relation to the progress in the branch of science of which it is a part, reason for hope will appear.. Measures of value, like other measures, have their movement. The history of measurement in general is in a high degree the history of exact science, and whether the subject matter be lines or angles, forces or values, this history presents an early state of ‘‘ grossness’’ and disorder that only by the slow march of intelligence developes into definiteness and uniformity. And the history of the measurement of values in par- ticular, low down in the scale of accuracy as it now is, yet presents an undoubted ascent from a still lower condition. Sceptics indeed, both without, and also, we regret to add, within the limits of this “ Association for the Advancement of Science,” have doubted the possibility of a science of values—of the science, that is to say, which forms the peculiar charge of this Section—but the ebb of doubt has ever attended the wave,of pro- gress, and the best antidote to such doubt, as well as the best stimulus to further progress, is the consideration of the onward course of statistical facts themselves. In the particular subject under discussion, the two great parliamentary commissions of 1851-52 and of 1860, in which many of the leading members of this Economic Section took a leading part, evidenced the awakening of the public mind to the necessity of a change. The Union Assessment Act of 1862; the Metropolis Valuation Act of 1869; the Local Valuation Bills grounded on these Acts annually introduced into Parliament ; the recent decision of the Court of Exchequer in the appeal case of Knowles v. McAdam; the deduction allowed in this year’s Inland Revenue Bill for depreciation of machinery, are all incidents of a progress towards a better measurement of values; and in these incidents collectively considered, your Committee recognise a system of lines of reform converging to the principle which they have attempted in their Reports to define and illustrate. It need scarcely be added, that the indirect results of true valuation, for example, its effect on the truth of returns, are not less important than those which are direct. A false system of valuation must of necessity encourage false returns. To deceive or to be plundered are its only alternatives, nor is it wonderful that popular casuistry often prefers the former. A true method of valua- tion on the other hand encourages true returns; it may not absolutely secure them, but it secures the removal of all that can obstruct them, and cancels the invitation to fraud, afforded by the present law. A true valuation alone can justify the exact and vigorous administration which must be the characteristic of an equitable tax on income. 230 REPORT— 1878. Report on Sunspots and Rainfall. By Cuartes Metproum, F.R.S. [A communication ordered by the Council to be printed in extenso among the Reports. ] 1. In 1873 and 1874 (see British Association Reports for those years) I submitted tables of the rainfalls of various parts of the world, and expressed the opinion that there was strong evidence of a connection between rainfall and sunspots. 2. Having received additional observations, I now beg to submit the principal results obtained by comparing the rainfalls of different countries, and the levels of some of the rivers of Central Europe with Wolf’s rela- tive sunspot numbers. 3. Probably the best method of comparing the sunspots with the rainfall is that of the harmonical analysis. In a paper which was com- municated to the Royal Society in January, 1876, I applied that method to the annual mean rainfalls of the greatest possible number of stations scattered over the globe, and to the mean annual depths of some of the rivers of Central Europe, and found not only that there was a rainfall cycle of nearly the same length as the sunspot cycle, but also that the two cycles had the same characteristics with respect to the intervals between the epochs of minimum and maximum and maximum and mini- © mum, a circumstance which strongly pointed to a causal connection. But, as the method is laborious, I have not yet had time to apply it to the rainfalls of single stations, or even to the mean rainfalls of different countries. I hope to be able to do so soon, and to communicate the results on another occasion. 4. In the meantime the probability or otherwise of a connection between sunspots and rainfall may be shown by the old method of arith- metical means. 5. Although the mean length of “the sunspot cycle is about eleven years, yet, in employing the method of arithmetical means, it would be objectionable to commence with any year whatever in a long series of observations, and taking the greatest possible number of periods of eleven years each, compare the annual mean rainfalls with the annual mean sun- spots ; for by doing so the maximum and minimum years might be so much dispersed over the common eleven-year period thus formed as to conceal any periodic variation that might exist. It is essential to refer the comparisons to the epochs of maximum and minimum, and this can- not well be done by commencing with any year whatever. 6. With aview of avoiding that objection as far as possible, and at the same time of obtaining a simpler and more expeditious method than that of the harmonical analysis, I make two comparisons, in one of which the maximum years of sunspots are taken for the point of reference, and in the other the minimum years. 7. As the epoch of maximum sunspots occurs on an average 3°7 years after the epoch of minimum, and the epoch of minimum 7°4 years after the epoch of maximum, the maximum years in the first comparison are all placed in the sizth of thirteen terms or series of years, while in the second comparison all the minimum years are placed in the eighth or ninth of other thirteen terms or series. Then, with the object of dimi- nishing the effects of so-called accidental irregularities in the rainfall, the ON SUNSPOTS AND RAINFALL. 231 thirteen terms are reduced to eleven, and these, for convenience, are called the ‘ mean cycle.’ I.—Sumspots. 8. Applied to Wolf’s relative numbers of sunspots (latest edition), the above method gives the following results for the years 1811-77 :— TasLe 1.—Sunspot numbers.—Maximum years in 6th line. n | - |Years @ |1811-23/1824-36/1832-44|1843-55/1855-67 1865-77, Means nice vee | of yele| tion tal | Cycle 1} 16 | 81 | 263 | *131 | 77 | 314 | 147) — | — | — 2} 49 | 162 | *94 | 193 | *51 | 147 | 116] 14:9 ]—33-9] 1 3] 126 | 350 | 133 | 383 | 229 | *88 | 21-8] 25-4] —234 | 2 4] 162 | 512 | 59:0 | 596 | 562 | 368 | 465 | 488] O00] 3 5 | 352 | 621 | 1193] 97-4 | 903 | 786 | 805 |\ 77-0 | +282 |. 4 6 | 46°9 | 67°2 | 136°3 | 124°9| 94°8 (131°8 100°4| 91°9 | +43'1) 5 7| 399 | 67:0 | 1041 | 95-4 | 77-7 | 1138 | 83-0 | 83:0] +342] 6 8| 297 | 594 | 834 | 698 | 61-0 | 997 | 65:7 | 656/+168) 7 9} 235 | 263 | 61:8 | 632 | 45-4 | 67-7 | 480] 490] + 02] 8 10| 162 | *94 | 385 | 52:7 | 462) 431 | 342] 346 ]—142] 9 11] 61 | 133 | 23:0 | 385 | 31-4 | 189 | 21:9 | 24:6 | —24-2 |-10 12| 39 | 59:0 | *131 | 210 | 14:7 | 113 | 205 | 22:5 | —263 | 11 13 | *26 | 1193 | 193 | 7-7 | *88 70} 27-6) — |. bbe ‘9. In the above table all the sunspot numbers for the maximum years 1816, 1829, 1837, 1848, 1860, and 1870, are in the siath horizontal line, and the places and the numbers for the minimum years are denoted by asterisks, The “ means” for the thirteen terms or series of years are given in the eighth column, and they show that the sunspots increase from 11°6 in the second term to 100°4 in the sixth, and then decrease to 20:5 in the twelfth. The “mean cycle ”’ in the next column is formed as follows :—a, b, c, &c., being the first, second, third, &c., terms of the a+2b+c 4 *‘means’’; the numerical value of is made the first term of 2 the “mean cycle,” the numerical value of Eae re & 5 its second term, and soon. The “variation” in the last column but one is the deviation from the mean value of the “ mean cycle.”’ 10. With the exception of 1833 and 1867, which are respectively in the third and tenth horizontal lines, the years of minimum sunspots are all in the first, second, twelfth, and thirteenth lines (or terms), and all the minimum sunspot numbers, except those for 1833, contribute to the formation of the first and eleventh terms of the “‘ mean cycle.’’ It would be better not to have the sunspot numbers for 1836 in the thirteenth line ; but their position cannot be altered without altering the position of the maximum year 1829, and the main object of this table is to obtain _ approximate values of the sunspots for the mean maximum year, and for one or two years on either side of it. 11. Some of the years are necessarily repeated in the succeeding series, but this does not materially affect the ‘‘ means’ or the “‘ mean cycle,” the average of the latter being 48°8, while the average value of the sunspots for the whole period (1811-67) is 46°9. 232 REPORT—1878. 12. It will be seen that the ‘‘ mean cycle”’ exhibits a well-marked sun- spot variation. Now if the sunspots are numerically related to the rain- fall, an exactly similar treatment of the rainfall should give a rainfall variation, corresponding, either directly or inversely, with the sunspot variation. 13. In the next table the sunspot numbers for the minimum years 1823, 1833, 1843, 1856, and 1867, are all in the eighth line, and the places and numbers for the maximum years are marked with asterisks. Taste II.—Sunspot numbers.—Minimum years in 8th line. | 2 Mean | Varia- |/Years of Years {1816-28 raat hak abet ace 1860-72) Means Cycle | tion | Cycle 1 *46°9 35°0 | 119°3 | 95-4 | *94:8 ) 78:3 — — — 2 39°9 51:2 | *136°9 | 69-8 Litter te) ees 731 | +233 1 3 29°7 62:1 | 1041 | 63-2 61:0 | 64:0 64:3 | +145 2 4 23°5 | *67-2 83:4 | 52:7 45-4 | 54-4 546 | + 4:5 3 5 16:2 67:0 61°8 | 38:5 45:2 | 45-7 44-2 |— 56 4 6 671 59-4 38°5 | 21:0 314 | 31:3 30°8 | —19-0 5 7 eat) 26°3 23-0 CRG 14:7 | 151 17-3 | —32°5 6 8 2'6 9:4 13°1 SL 8's 73 12°7 | —37°1 7 9 81 13°3 19°3 | 22:9 36°38 | 20°1 244 | — 25-4 8 10 16:2 59:0 38°3 | 56:2 786 | 49:7 516 | + 18 9 11 35:0 | 119°3 59°6 | 90:3 |*131°8 | 87:2 80°'7°| +30°9 | 10 12 51:2 | *136-9 97-4 | *94°8 | 1138 | 98:8 946 | +448] 11 13 62:1 | 104:1 |*124:9 | 77-7 99-7 | 93-7 = — — The table has been formed in the way in which Table I. has been formed. All the maximum years except 1829 contribute to the formation of the first and eleventh terms of the mean cycle. The mean of the mean cycle is 49°8, and the mean for the whole period (1816-72) is 51:3. As in Table I., the mean cycle exhibits a well-marked variation, the sunspots decreasing to the seventh year, and then increasing to the eleventh. If, then, the sunspots and the rainfall are numerically related, a corresponding variation should be found for the rainfall, when similarly treated. IT.—Rainfall of Great Britain compared with the Sunspots. 14, The rainfall of Great Britain, as represented by returns from fifty-four stations in different parts of the country, is given in Table III. The following table has been prepared in the same way as Table I. (Sunspots), and it will be seen from the last two columns but one that the rainfall and sunspot variations are remarkably similar, the rainfall increasing from the first to the sixth year of the cycle, and then de- creasing to the eleventh. The same stations have been used in finding the annual mean rainfalls for each series of thirteen years. The mean of the mean cycle is 31:4 inches, and the mean rainfal} from 1824 to 1867 is 31:2 inches. ON SUNSPOTS AND RAINFALL. 233 The range of variation is about 3:7 inches. The epoch of maximum rainfall occurs about one year after the epoch of maximum sunspots. The spot variation has been derived from Table I. 15. An important advantage of the above arrangement is that the columns of “‘ means’”’ enable us to compare directly the mean of the sun- spot numbers for the maximum years with the mean rainfall for the same TasLe ITI.—Great Britain.—Maximum years in 6th line. No. of Stations) 10 18 2 $0 M Mean | Rain | Spot eee eans Cycle | Var. Var. Grele Years |1824-36/1832-44/1843-55/1855_-67 y in. in. in. in. in. in. in. 1 30°9 26-4 31:8 27:1 29°1 — — — — 2 26°6 29°4 26°9 35:0 29°5 29-2 — 2:2 | — 37-2 1 3 23°7 25°83 33°3 32°5 28°8 29°7 | —1°7 | — 22°8 2 + , 29°5 29:0 35°1 34:1 31-9 31:4 00 | + 4:4 3 5 33°0 34:2 28°6 37:0 33°2 32°6 + 1:2 | + 33:0 4 6 287 | 26'2 37:3 | 361 32:1 | 32°5 | +1:1/+43°8 5 7 30°8 28-4 30°6 40°7 32°6 32°9 | + 1:5 | + 32°9 6 8 32°3 32:1 29°9 42-7 34:2 32°7 +13 | + 14:3 7 9 26:2 25°3 29:3 38-2 29°7 321 | +07|-— 29 8 10 29-7 34-1 39°1 36-1 34°8 318 | + 0-4 | — 16°6 9 11 24:5 24:9 30°9 32°5 28:2 30°7 | — 07 | — 24:7] 10 12 28°6 29°7 28-4 40:0 31:6 30°3 | — 11 | — 24:0} 11 13 33°5 24:3 25°5 37-1 301 — — — — years, and also the sunspots with the rainfall for two years on either side of the maximum years, with very little risk of distortion from the mini- mum years not being all in the same horizontal line. 16. With regard to the way in which the “ mean cycle” is formed, it may be remarked that } in the expression Gist Pi 8 (see par. 8) gets double weight, and that the quotient is put down as the rainfall of the first year of the “ mean cycle,’ which year corresponds with the’second of the thirteen terms or series of years, that is, with b. This is somewhat similar to the common practice of tracing with the hand an approximate average curve through the peaks and hollows of a jagged or serrated curve. 17. An example of the converse process, namely, that of placing the minimum years in the eighth line or term, is given in the following Table, which has been constructed from the annual mean rainfalls of ten stations, “‘ widely separated,” as given by Mr. Symons, in the ‘ Report of the British Association for 1865.’ Table IV. has been constructed in the same way as Table II. (Sun- spots). Now it would appear that on the whole the rainfall attained its mini- mum a year or two after the epoch of minimum sunspots. In fact, both this table and Table III. show that the rainfall lags behind the sunspots in respect of time. The mean of the mean cycle is 28°1 inches, and the mean for the whole period (1816-61) is 28°3 inches. From the column of “ means’’ we see that although the rainfall was 234 REPORT— 1878. above the average in the mean minimum year, yet it was below the average in the previous and two following years, thus forming, on the whole, around the minimum year, as shown in the “ mean cycle,” a group of four or five years in which the rainfall was below the average ; and the mean rainfall for these years is scarcely affected by the positions Taste [V.—Great Britain.—Minimum years in 8th line. Years |1816-28|1826-38|1836—48|1849-61| Means toe at Spot Sore in in. in. in. in in in 1 293 | 23-7 | 335 | 2985 | 98.7 | — a J a 2 | 297 | 295 | 245 | 263 | 275 | 289] 401] 42431 1 3 | 303 | 330 | 271 | 267 | 293 | 294} 4113/4175] 2 4 | 304 | 987 | 313 | 355 | 315 | 2971 +16]4+ 841 3 5 245 | 308 °'| 247 | 27-4 | 268 | 286] +05|/— 27] 4 6 299 | 323 | 335 | 224 | 995 | 278} —03|/—168| 65 7 | 266 | 262 |° 25:5 | 234 | 95-4 | 274] —-07]/—304| 6 t= 3 311 29°7 30°4 25:9 29:3 27°5| — 0-6 |— 361 7 9 30:9 | 245 | 93-7 | 257 | 262 | 970] —11|—272] 8 10 | 266 | 2985 | 979 | 228 | 264 | 969] —12/— 35] 9 1 93-7 | 335 | 296 |. 285 | 288 | 98:0 | —o1] +4247] 10 12° | 295 | 245 | 968)] 333 | 283 | 290) +09] 4420| 11 13 330 |. 271 | 360 | 27-0 | 308 | — cer i pee Pa occupied jn the table by the maximum years. It is to be remarked, also, that if a greater number of stations were taken, as in Table III., it would be found that the rainfall in the mean minimum year is below the average; but it was desirable to adopt Mr. Symons’s figures alone, because they furnish independent evidence of a rainfall cycle, even for a small number of stations. On the other hand we have, around the mean maximum year in Table III., a group of five or six years in which the rainfall is above the average. From these two tables (III. and IV.) it is concluded that there is strong evidence of a rainfall cycle for Great Britain. 18. I will now compare with the sunspots the rainfall of Edinburgh, as given in the ‘ Journal of the Scottish Meteorological Society.’ Taste V.—Edinburgh.—Maximum years in 6th line. ea : Mean |} Rain Spot |Year of Years |1824—36)1832-44)1843—-55|1855-67| Means Cycle | Var. Var. | Cycle in in. in. in, in in in 1 24°8 23:2 23°8 20:3 23-0 — — — — 2 22:1 20:9 20:9 28°5 23°1 22°83 | — 2:8 | — 37:2 1 3 15°3 21:0 26°6 24°9 22:0 23°38 | —18 | — 22:8 2 4 32°6 25°2 315 24:3 28°4 26°3 +07) + 4:4 3 5 25°2 33:0 22°8 25°9 26:7 28:0 + 2:4 | + 33:0 + 6 30°0 26's 30°6 33°44 | 30'2 | 28:9 +3°3 | +43°8 5 if 33:2 31:0 22°2 28°6 28°8 28-4 + 2°8 | + 32:9 6 8 24°5 23°4 21°3 3a°9 25°8 261 + 05 | + 14:3 7 9 23'2 25'5 22:8 25°6 24:3 25:2 | —O4]— 29 8 10 20°9 26'2 31:5 28°1 26°7 246 | —1:0 | — 166 9 11 21:0 169 21°8 23°6 20°8 23:1 | —2°5 | — 24:7 10 12 25°2 23°8 20°9 27°2 24°3 23°99 | —17 | — 240 uf 13 33:0 20°9 20°3 31:0 26°3 — — — —_— ON SUNSPOTS AND RAINFALL. 235 Here we have a remarkable parallelism, both the sunspots and the rainfall attaining their maximum and minimum in the same years, and rising and falling together with considerable regularity. The mean of the mean cycle is 25°6 inches, and the mean rainfall is 25°7 inches. 19. The next table gives the results of the converse arrangement for the rainfall of Edinburgh. TasLeE VI.—Edinburgh.— Minimum years in 8th line. in. in, in. in in. in in 1 15:3 33°0 22°2 33°4 26°0 — — — — 2 32°6 268 21:3 28°6 27°3 27°2 + 1:2 | + 24-7 1 3 252 31:0 22°8 33°9 28:2 278 |} +18 | + 15°9 2 4 30°0 23-4 31°5 25°6 27°6 27°6 +16)+ 56 3 5 33°2 25°5 21°8 281 27-2 264 | +04)]+4+ 54 4 6 24:5 26°2 20°9 23°6 23°8 24-1 —1:9 | — 204 5 7 23°2 16:9 20°3 27:2 21°9 23-4 | —2°6 | — 363 6 8 20:9 | 23°8 | 28°5 31:0 26:0 | 24:4 | — 1°6 |-—-42'1 7 9 21:0 20°9 24:9 28°6 23°8 246 | — 1:4 | — 28°6 8 10 25:2 26°6 24:3 22°2 24°6 25:2 |} —O8|+ 2°79 g 11 33°0 31°5 25°9 2271 28°71 26°8 + 0'8 | + 35:3 10 12. 26°8 22°8 33°4 23°2 26°4 28-2 | + 2:2 | + 48°9 11 13 31:0 30°6 28°6 38°2 32°1 — — — — We have here also a remarkable parallelism, but not quite so much so as in Table V. The rainfall reaches its minimum in the year before that of minimum sunspots. : The mean of the mean cycle is 26°0 inches, and the mean rainfall is also 26:0 inches. The variation range is about 6 inches, the rainfall being 3:3 inches above the mean in Table V., and 2°6 inches below it in Table VI. . 20. Similar results might be given for the rainfalls of other individual stations in Great Britain, but it is unnecessary to do so. For the present it is sufficient to know that the annual mean falls at fifty-four stations, virtually obtained at haphazard, as well as the mean annual falls at Mr. Symons’s ten stations, which were selected by him for a different purpose, show, on the whole, a well-marked rainfall cycle corresponding with the sunspot cycle. 21. The rainfall of Greenwich, although greater in the maximum than in the minimum years of sunspots, is not nearly so favourable as the rainfalls of Edinburgh and other stations. III.—Rainfall of the Continent of Europe compared with the Sunspots. 22. Through the kindness of Mr. Estourgies and the Directors’ of various Observatories, I obtained some time ago returns of the rainfalls at forty-five stations dispersed over the Continent of Europe. The re- sults, according to the method adopted on this occasion, are given in the next two tables. As at Edinburgh, the year of maximum rainfall coincides with the year of maximum sunspots. 236 REPORT—1 878. The mean rainfall for the mean cycle is 26°6 inches, and for the whole period (1824-67) 26:8 inches. Owing to some heavy floods in 1844, 1855, and 1867, the rainfall for the eleventh year of the mean cycle is somewhat above the average. TasLe VII.—Continent of Europe —Maximum years in 6th line. No. of 5 Stations ‘ | » 20 ty M Mean| Rain | Spot |Yearsof cae Cycle} Var. Var. | Cycle Years 1824-36|1832-44 1843-55|1855-67 in. in. in. in in. in, in. 1 27:7 22°5 29-1 27-2 26°6 —- — — — 2 22°8 28°8 30:0 25°1 26°6 | 25°8 — 08 | — 37:2 1 3 21:4 22-0 31:3 19°7 23°6 | 24:8 — 1:8 | — 22°8 2 4 27:0 241 29°8 22°1 25:7 | 25:3 —-13/4+ 44 3 5 25:6 27°6 26:7 2671 26°5 | 27:0 + 04 | + 33-0 4 6 29'3 28°7 30°'5 29°4 29°'5 |27°3.| + 1':2|\/+ 43°88 5 7 23:0 27°8 27:2 25°1 25'8 | 27°6 + 1:0 | + 32:9 6 8 29°4 30°7 31:2 26:2 29°4 | 27:7 + 11} 4+ 14:3 7 9 22°1 27°9 30°6 24°5 26:3 | 27-2 +06/— 2:9 8 10 27:7 28°5 28°2 23°4 26°9 2671 — 0°5 | — 16°6 9 Wik 19°9 2671 29°6 22:5 24:5 | 25°8 — 08 | — 24-7 10 12 25:3 30°3 27:0 2771 27:4 | 27:2 + 06 | — 24:0 11 13 27°6 30°5 30°7 29°3 29°5 — — — — 23. The converse arrangement of the yearly rainfall at eleven stations gives the following results. Taste VIII.—Continent of Europe-—Minimum years in 8th line. 5, : Mean Rain ‘| q Years of Years | 1836-48 | 1849-61 | Means Cycle Var. Spot Var. Cycle m.m. m.m. m.m. m.m. m.m. 1 660 668 664 —- — -= — 2 ews 817 767 726 + 40 + 44:7 1 3 676 73 706 718 + 32 + 30°0° 2 4 739 648 693 694 + 8 +128 3 5 685 681 683 677 - 9 — 6:2 4 6 647 656 651 665 — 21 — 23-4 5 7 611 744 677 677 -— 9 — 37:3 6 8s 756 650 703 676 —10 — £1°0 7 9 743 499 621 653 — 33 + 30:0 8 10 735 603 669 665 — 21 + 70 9 11 714 692 703 698 + 12 + 18°6 10 12 704 735 719 700 + 14 + 375 11 13 687 636 661 —_— = — — The above table has been derived from a paper by the late Dr. Carl Telinek, of Vienna, published in the ‘Zeitschrift der Oesterreichischen fiir Meteorologie,’ for March, 1873, in which the rainfalls at fourteen stations are given. Three of these stations, the returns for which are not com- plete, have not been used in forming the table. The mean rainfall for the mean cycle and also for the whole period (1836-61) is 686 m.m. The rainfall was at its minimum (33 m.m. below the mean) in the year after the year of minimum sunspots, and at its maximum when the sunspots were at their maximum. ON SUNSPOTS AND RAINFALL. 237. Considering that there are only two sunspot periods, the results may be regarded as favourable. The rainfall and sunspots were both above (+) or below (—) their respective means in the same years. ; T have used Dr. Ielinek’s table in preference to a more extensive one, because, like Mr. Symons’s table, it furnishes independent evidence. 24. In the next two tables the rainfall of Paris is compared with the sunspots. The series of observations at this station is so long that eight complete sunspot cycles might be taken, but, as objection has been made to going back much farther than the time when Schawbe commenced his observations, only four cycles are taken in one of these tables, and five in the other. Taste [X.—Paris——Maximum years in 6th line. Mean | Rain} Spot |Yearsof Years |1824-36|1832-44|1843-55|1855-67| Means Cycle | Var. Var. | Cycle mm | mm. | mm. | mm. | mm. | mm, | mm, 1 572 456 542 344 478 — —_— — —_ 2 469 503 571 565 527 502 —11 | — 37-2 1 3 410 421 581 492 476 493 — 20 | — 22°8 2 4 501 438 564 466 492 501 —12 /+ 44 3 5 585 611 430 545 543 541 + 28 | + 33:0 4 6 560 | 548 575 655 | 584 563 | +50 |+43°8) 5 7 573 542 597 458 543 554 + 41 | + 32°9 6 8 529 580 563 516 547 522 + 9 | + 143 7 9 456 455 469 426 452 487 — 26 |-— 29 8 10 503 527 597 366 498 472 — 41 | — 166 9 11 421 342 454 542 440 484 — 29 |— 247) 10 12 438 542 614 644 559 520 + 7 |—240/ 11 13 611 571 344 565 523 — —_ —- _— The maximum rainfall’coincides with the maximum sunspots. The mean of the mean cycle is 513 m.m., and the mean rainfall for the whole period (1824-67) is 517 m.m. As in the case of the annual means for forty-five stations (Table VIL.), the rainfall is somewhat above the mean in the eleventh year of the cycle. 25. The converse process is given in the following table. Taste X.—Paris.—Minimum years in 8th line. z Mean} Rain | Spot Years oS po S 1816-28/1826-38 1836—48]1849-61|1860-72| Means Cycle| Var. | Var. - of : 'ycle mm | mm. | mm. | mm. | mm. |-mm.| mm.|] mm. 1 546 410 611 597 655 564 — — — _— 2 565 501 548 563 458 527 531 | + 20 | + 23:3 1 3 432 585 | 542 469 516 509 525 | + 14 | + 145 2 4 615 560 580 597 426 556 516 |+ 5|+ 4:8 3 5 378 573 455 454 366 445 501 |—10|— 56 4 6 584 529 527 614 542 559 501 |— 10 |— 19:0 5 7 424 456 342 344 644 442 492 | — 19 | — 32°5 6 8 457 503 542 565 565 526 | 502 | — 9 | —37°1 7 9 572 491 571 492 512 514 510°} — 1 | — 25-4 8 10 | 469 438 581 466 ATT 486 499 |— 2] + 18 9 11 410 611 564 545 418 510 510 |— 1j|+ 309} 10 12 501 548 430 655 527 532 535 | + 24 |+ 448] 11 13 | 585 542 575 458 671 566 a — — — 238 ' REPORT—1878. The rainfall decreases till the sixth year of the mean cycle, that is, the year before that of minimum sunspots, and then increases to the eleventh year. The mean of the mean cycle is 511 m.m., and the mean rainfall from 1816 to 1872 is 515 m.m. 26. As another example of the rainfall variation. at a single station on the Continent of Europe, I will take Prague from 1832 to 1867. Taste XI.—Prague.—Maximum years in 6th line. Mean Rain Spot |Yearsof Years | 1832-44 | 1843-55 | 1855-67 | Means Cycle Var Var Cycle in. in. in. in. in, in, 1 10°8 17°5 17-7 15:3 — — — aes 2 19°3 23°6 14:9 19°3 17:0 + 05 — 42:1 1 3 101 17°5 14:9 14-2 15°6 -— 09 — 27°5 2 4 10:4 18°5 15°5 14:8 15°8 — 07 + 35 3 5 16°6 23°3 19-1 19°7 18-2 +17 + 38°2 4 6 18°6 16:9 20:6 18°7 18'2 +1:7 +50°9 5 if 15:9 15:7 16°5 16:0 17°5 + 1:0 + 36:5 6 8 18°6 20°5 18°9 19°3 17°6 +11 + 16:3 7 9 14:6 18°4 14:7 15°9 16°3 — 02 + 05 8 10 18°8 14:5 9-4 14:2 14°4 — 21 — 12°5 9 11 9-4 18°6 121 13°4 14:5 — 2:0 — 26:3 10 12 175 16-4 175 171 16°6 + O01 — 38-4 11 13 23°6 17-7 15:5 18°9 — — — — The maximum rainfall coincides with the maximum sunspots. The mean rainfall for the mean cycle is 16°5 inches, and 16:6 inches: for the period 1832-67. The variation is less regular than at Edinburgh and Paris, but we have only three periods. 27. The next table shows the converse rainfall variation for Prague. Taste XIJ.—Prague.—Minimum years in 8th line. Years |1836-48|1849-61| Means Orale Rain Var. | Spot Var. one in. in. in. in, in. 1 166+)! 15-70) 0164 ahi 2 2% ji 2 186 | 265 | 225 | 195 | +20 + 48:8 1 3 19 | 184 | 171 | 180 | +05 + 29°6 2 4 186 | 145 | 165 | 166 | —09 4 124 3 5 46 |:'186°| 166 | 168 | —07 OG 4 6 188 |..164 | 76. | 163°) _— 12 — 23:8 F 7 94 | 177 | 135 | 182 | —23 ~ 377 6 8 17'5 14:9 16:2 16°2 —-13 —41°4 7 9 936 | 149 | 192 | 177 +O ~ 305 8 10 76 | 155 | 165. | 177 | +02 Ws ante 9 ul is5 | 191 | 188 | 190 | 415 18-2 10 12 23:3 | 206 | 219 | 198 4 23 + 37-1 ml 13 169 | 165 | 167 | — ES mes + On the whole the rainfall decreases to the sixth year of the cycle, and then increases to the eleventh. The mean of the mean cycle is 17:5 inches, and the mean rainfall from 1836 to 1861 is 17-4 inches. ON SUNSPOTS AND RAINFALL. 239 IV.—The Levels of Rivers of Central Europe compared with the Sunspots. 28. A paper by Herr Gustav Wex, ‘ On the Decrease of Water in the Wells, Streams, and Rivers,’ published in 1873, contains a number of Tables, giving the yearly mean heights (or depths) of water in the Elbe, Rhine, Oder, Vistula, and Danube, for various periods from 1728 to 1871. _ Having been favoured with a copy of that important paper, I have compared the annual mean levels of the rivers with the sunspots, in the same manner as the rainfall has been compared, and the results are given in the next five tables. Taste XIII.—Depths of Rivers:—Maximum years in 6th line. Pa 25 o 3 nS 5 a ® H + (aus eee oor aet ota | ah @ |'Se) Be bed lee b|1g11| & 3 % Py 3 ie bk Sued ele ie ele cles — — 1 —_ a bb ft. in. | ft. in. | ft. in. | ft. in.| ft. in.| ft. in. | ft. in. | ft. in. ft. in. 1/8 02/4 10°8)6 87/4 11:0/6 1:3)7 2516 3-7) — — — — 215 O7/6 51/6 43/6 02)7 3:0)4 1171/6 O1/6 09; O 00] — 26:2) 1 317 T6l6 83/5 9415 646 6-2/3 8-2)5 11:7)/5 10-7) —0O 2:2}—141] 2 4\6 64/6 2816 63/4 O7/6 42/4 09/5 76,5 9:3)—0 36|/+ 5:4) 3 516 8416 48/7 02/4 9:06 0-3/4 3°8/5 10:-4/6 2:0) +0 11] + 261) 4 6\'8 7°2'8 6:5|8 8.8/7 2°14 6°6| 6 2°38|7 3°7\|6 9°3' +0 8'4'+ 347; 5 718 3917 GOT 55/6 665 O5)4 71/6 7116 9:2) + 0 83) + 25-9) 6 818 17/6 O9)7 45/7 366 9:9/3 76/6 67/6 44.4+035]}4+ 99] 7 9/7 1:2)5 10:2)4 11:0)/7 4:7|/6 85|2 61/5 9°0)5 10°6|—0 23);— 3:7) 8 10/6 75)6 O8/6 O2/6 2:05 75/4 48/5 98/5 9:6) -—0 3:3]/—141|] 9 11|7 1011/7 81/5 64/3 82)6 8-713 58/5 99/5 7:9) —0 5:0] — 21:2} 10 12/6 3:°9)5 53/4 0-7/6. 5:0) 5 100) 2 11°3)5 2:0/5 7:7) —0O 5:2) — 22-9/ 11 13/5 8115 77/4 90/8 767 25/6 46/6 4:6) — — — os From 1799 to 1811 we have (in Austrian feet and inches) the levels of the Rhine, Elbe, and Oder; from 1811 to 1823 those of the Rhine, Elbe, Oder, and Vistula; from 1824 to 1844 those of the Elbe and Vistula; and from 1843 to 1867 those of the Elbe, Vistula, and Danube. As might have been expected from the results for the rainfall of Europe (Table VII.), the maximum height or level was attained in the mean year of maximum sunspots, and, as a rule, the rivers fluctuated with the sunspots. . The mean of the mean cycle is 6 ft. 0°9 inches, and for the whole period (1799 to 1867) the mean is 6 ft. 1°8 inches. If we omit the years 1799 to 1811, as being in the opinion of some too early, we still get similar results, and likewise similar results for the still later periods 1824-67. 29. The converse process gives the following results :— In the next table we have the Rhine, Elbe, and Oder from 1804 to 1816; the Rhine, Elbe, Oder, and Vistula from 1817 to 1829; the Elbe and Vistula from 1827 to 1839; the ‘Elbe, Vistula, and Danube from 1850 to 1862; and the Vistula and Danube from 1861 to 1871. The levels in the years of minimum sunspots are placed in the seventh line, because the river variation was found to overlap the sunspot varia- tion to a considerable extent. " 240 REPORT—1878. Taste X[V.—Depths of Rivers.—Minimum years in 7th line. © o EA a = £ oH Peli Ta a a ik 7 itt 5 gaa] Ss 248 alles s = — xs — i) qo s og 538 2.8 eh Hl & oO o % o B Ss | ao | ee ane | 30 I co ce onl a al 4 ft. in. | ft. in. | ft. in. | ft. in. | ft. in. | ft. in. | ft. in. | ft. in Tipe 1/8 7217 69)6 63/7 21/8 80.4 2:2)7 14) — — = SY 2/8 3916 0-9/7 02/6 66/8 463 15/6 69/6 82) + 0 56) +164] 1 3/8 1:7/5 1102/8 88/7 36/7 1:6)1 90/6 58/6 7:5)+049)+ 53) 2 417 1216 O817 55/7 4:7)9 61/4 4:8/6 11°8)6 86) +060)— 54] 38 516 7517 S17 45/6 2-0/7 63/3 34/6 53/6 4:2) +016)—177| 4 6|6 10°55 53/4 11:0/3 8-2/9 95/2 67/5 65/5 10°77) —0 3:9) — 276] 5 7\5 7°8\5 7°7\6 0°2|6 5°O|6 5°5|6 2'5|/6 0'8/511°4| —03°2| —31'0| 6 8/5 3:66 10:7/5 64/8 7:6/5 6°7/4 10°7/6 1°6/5 11:3) —0 3:3} — 21:8] 7 9/6 53/5 11:5)4 O7|/7 1:2/5. 51/3 86/5 54/5 81)—-0 65| + O04] 8 10/6 2:95 2-7/4 9:0/7 53/5 91/5 8-2/5 10-2)5 11-4) — 0 3:2| + 238) 9 11/5 11:3/6 78/7 21/5 11°6/8 63/5 8916 80/6 3:4) + 0 0°8| + 33:2) 10 12/5 10:0\6 8416 6:6)4 7:8)6 O02) — |5 11:4/6 3-6) + 0 1:0) + 30°0} 11 13/8 17/8 OO|}7 365 45/4 51) — |6 7:3) — — — — The lowest level is attained two years after the mean year of mini- mum sunspots. The mean of the mean cycle is 6 ft. 2°6 inches, and for the years 1804 to 1871 the mean level is 6 ft. 3°6 inches. 30. Taking the Elbe alone, we get the following results :— Tapte XV.—Depths of the Elbe.-—Maximum years in 6th line. Mean | River Spot /Yearsof Years |1824-36)1832—44|1843-55)1855-67| Means Cycle | Var. Vor. Gycle ft. in, | ft. ims) ft.in.) ft. in. | ft. in.) £. in. | ft) in: 1 6110} 5 00| 7 2:0|7 7:0)6 80) — aa a wes 2 6 3216 40! 7 90/6 0O0| 6 7:0} 6 4:1)+0 31] — 37:2 1 3 5 73\5 87)16 40| 4 7:0| 5 G67] 5 10:0|/—0 3:0} — 22:8 2 4 7 14/4 #1:5/6 40/5 00|5 77) 5 86/—0 44] + 4:4 3 5 7 $2\4 90) 6 90|5 00] 6 06] 6 1:4/+0 0-4] + 33:0 4 6 7 1141/7 2°05 3°0'6 7:06 89/6 6:3|/+05°:3\+43°3 5 7 7 80! 7 00) 5100) 5100) 6 70) 6 87\+0 7:7) + 32:9 6 8 8 00/7 60/7 50/5 20) 7 02)6 72/40 62) +4 14:3 v/ 9 5 00/5110! 7 7:0|4 9:0] 5 97) 6 15/+005)— 2:9 8 10 6 4016 50| 6 5:0] 4 50) 5107/5 8&4/—0 46) — 16:6 9 11 5 $7|4 50/6 80) 4 1:0) 5 27) 5 58\/—0 7:2) — 24:7] 10 12 4 15|)7 2:0|7 00) 4 10! 5 71|5 94/—0 3:6] — 24:0 11 13 4 9017 9:0} 7 70/6110|6 90; — — pad, rae The mean maximum level (6 ft. 8°7 inches) is attained soon after the maximum sunspots. The mean depth for the mean cycle is 6 ft. 1:0 inches, and for the whole period 6 ft. 2°2 inches. 31. The converse arrangement gives the following results for the Elbe :— The lowest mean level occurs about two years after the epoch of minimum sunspots (as in Table XIV.), and there is a considerable amount of overlapping, the river lagging behind the sunspots. ON SUNSPOTS AND RAINFALL. 92 ~ 41 The mean for the mean tycle is 6 ft. 4:7 inches, and also 6 ft. 4:7 inches for the years 1816 to 1861. Taste XVI.—Depths of the Elbe.—Minimum years in 8th line. Mean | River Years |1816-28 1826-38/1836-48/1849-61} Means Cycle | Var. fein. |tb. in. | Tit, THe etbeine eth, wos thy ae | tba: 1 7 35!) 5 7:3/| 4 9:0] 5 10:0] 5 10-4 — — 2 6. 76).7 1:4] 7 20) 7 50] 7 10/6 87/+0 40 3 5 28)7 8217 00/7 7:0] 6105) 7 0:2/+0 7:5 4 7 O7| 7114) 7 60! 6 5:0] 7 2:8] 6 11:1/+0 6-4 5 5 32|)7 80) 511:0)} 6 80/6 45/6 9:5/+0 4:8 6 7 49!)8 00/6 50/7 00] 7 2:5) 6 75/40 2:8 7 5106; 5 00} 4 50|7 70)5 86]6 26/—0O 2:1 8 5 546 4:0'7 2'0'6 0:0|'6 2°86 1:3\-03°4 9 6110; 5 87|/7 90) 4 7416 3:0!16 05|—0 4:2 10 6 32) 4 15/6 40/5 0015 5215 7:6/—0 91 11 5 73/4 9:0] 6 40/5 00] 5 51)5 95!—0 7-2 12 7 14|7 20) 6 90! 6 7:0) 6 108] 6 5:0/+0 0:3 13 7 82) 7 00|5 3:0)5100/6 53] — — H ro | Saya ne l+t++ aCe. meet JOT Te me nwwmwre ORwnN : SAVORS 1 HE GO HE Cr oo | Years of Cycle | | Scag annewtor | 32. The next table gives the fluctuations of the Rhine from 1799 to 1835. Taste XVII.—Depths of Rhine.—Maximum years in 6th line. (aac SN RAR A ae PR OENPIOE 1799 to 1811 ECs 10 7:0 6 10:0 11 00 8 10°5 8 50 10 8°5 10 50 11 11°5 9 2:0 30 30 6:0 15 Years CONQarwhoe 9 10 8 8 Mean River 1811-23 | 1824-36] Means Cycle Vat! fi nie th eine Shia ne | tbe cine eben ane 8 1:5 11) 3*4:/ 10» 0:0 — — 9 02} 8 4:2! 8 O8!] 8 76/—0 2:8 8 14] 6 14] 8 49] 8 58/—-0 46 8 60; 9 93) 9 O06] 8 S1I—O 2:3° 7114) 8 3:4) 8 26] 9 05/40 21 12 4:2) 9 OL) 10 83/10 O-1/4+1 17 ll 41) 9 74/10 55/10 5:0/+1 66 8 34/10 11:3) 10 O07] 9 53/40 69 6 70; 5105) 7 2:5) 8 26/—0 7:8 7 G1) 8 32) 8 41] 8 2:6/—0 7:8 10 06} 6 78] 8118} 8 50!—O 5:4 611:7| 6 75) 7 4:4] 7 11:8/—0 106 8 40 — 8 27 — = Spot Var. —_ > bo 63 | Ondo od HE Niro DODDNOMOOD a fb ttrttt DAW AN 1 | Ree Years of Cycle [FS | RKPOSDADMRWHH The Rhine attained its mean maximum level about one year after the year of maximum sunspots. The mean of the mean cycle is 8 ft. 1799 to 1836 is 8 ft. 8-2 inches. V.—Rainfall of America compared with the Sunspots. 10°4 inches, and the mean for 33. The rainfall returns for America, thirty-four in number, have been obtained from ‘Tables and Results of the Precipitation in Rain and : Snow,’ published by the Smithsonian Institution (Washington, 1872). . 1878. R 242 REPORT— 1878. Taste XVIII.—Rainfall of America.—Maximum years in 6th line. No. of : Stations} 7 a 2B ” Mean | Rain | Spot |Yearsof —— Cycle | Var. | Var. | Cycle Years |1824-36/1832-44|1843-55|1855-67 in. in. in. in. ines eine is B 1 39°0 409 42-9 42:4 | 41:3 —_ — — _ 2 33°1 39-6 374 35°6 | 36°5 38°8 | — 2°8 | — 37:2 1 3 45:2 35°3 38:2 46:0 | 41:2 40°6 | — 1:0 | — 22°8 2 4 50:1 36:7 41°5 46:0 | 43°6 425 | +09 |]+ 4:4 3 5 34:3 391 45°5 47-7 | 41°6 421 | + 0:5 | + 33:0 4 6 53°11 | 35°4 | 40°0 | 37°8 | 41°6 | 41°8 | + 0°2/+43'8 5 7 51:0 37°3 39:0 42:4 | 42-4 42°9 | + 1:3 | + 32:9 6 8 52°6 37°2 46°5 44-4 | 45-2 43°6 | + 2:0 | + 143 7 9 45-2 40:2 367 44-3 | 41°6 424 |} +08 |— 2:9 8 10 388 43°8 43-1 39°2 | 41:2 41:3 | — 0:3 | — 16°6 9 11 39°1 41:5 39°9 44:0 | 41-1 40°9 | —07 |— 247] 10 12 38°7 42:5 38°9 407 | 40:2 402 | —14]— 240] 11 13 381 36:2 41-1 42°8 | 39°5 —_ = = ae The maximum rainfall occurs about two years after the maximum sunspots. The mean rainfall for the cycle is 41°6 inches, and for the forty-four years 41.3 inches. 34. From the converse process we get the following table :— TasLE XIX.—Rainfall at ten stations in America, from 1849 to 1861.— Minimum year in 8th line. Mean Rain Spot Years of oS seis! Cycle Var. Var. Cycle in. in. in, ul 38-0 — — — — 2 48°8 43-2 + 1-4 + 26°9 1 3 375 41-2 — 06 + 146 2 4 41°3 40:0 —18 + 41 3 5 40:0 40:0 —18 — 100 4 6 39-0 40-1 —17 — 25°6 5 7 42-4 39°8 — 2:0 — 373 6 8s 35°7 39'9 —1'9 — 37°4 7 a 46-0 43-4 + 1:6 — 20°9 8 10 46:0 46-4 - +46 + 8&8 9 11 4AT‘7 44:8 + 3:0 + 35-4 10 12 37°8 41-4 — 0-4 + 41°8 11 13 42-4 — = a a The minimum rainfall took place at the time of minimum sunspots. The mean of the mean cycle is 41-8 inches, and the mean from 1849 to 1861 is 41-7 inches. 35. The longest series of observations was made at New Bedford. galene the period 1824-67, we get the following results for that station :— ON SUNSPOTS AND RAINFALL. 243 Tape XX.—Rainfall at New Bedford.—Maximum years in 6th line. Years |1824—36)1832—44/1843-55|1855-67| Means 1 42°] 2 33°9 3 48°7 4 55:9 5 34:7 6 581 7 57°5 8 54-4 9 438 10 37-9 11 40-1 12 42:0 13 38:1 Mean | Rain Cycle | Var. in. in. in, in. 36°4 418 — — 33°0 352 38:7 | — 3:2 38°6 42°5 407 | —1:2 44°6 38°6 404 | —1°5 38°5* | 43:3 411 | —08 456 39-1 — — * Interpolated. ll++t+t+41 1 | Spot |Yearsof Var. moRPoe rw nonwre | 2 | HH 2 ROH BS (gg Co Re tS See SES eo Os Cycle = HOODIA wr | The maximum rainfall occurs about two years after the maximum of sunspots, and the minimum rainfall near the time of minimum sunspots. The mean of the cycle, and also for the period 1824-36, is 41°9 inches. _ 36. By the converse arrangement, the rainfall of New Bedford is least _ near the epoch of minimum sunspots, but generally the variation is irregular. VI.—Rainfall at Stations in India compared with the Sunspots. As yet the rainfalls of only a few stations in India have been examined. Taste XXIJ.—Rainfalls of India.—Maximum years in 6th line. No. of Stations Years |1824-36/1832-44 in. 33°8 64:1 69°6 84:7 799 51:2 52-1 73:0 46°2 10 54:2 11 547 12 52:0 13 66-4 CONngqurwhoe in. ATT 56:4 59°3 63°2 59°4 52°5 52:0 63°9 60°4 63°3 69°3 57°6 68:2 Rain Var. Spot |Years of Var. Cycle | 5 [++] 1) +++] wIOOSHM mom WONHAMNARAHS [tebe se £1 bo 2 | Sa moo Ras HAH > bo HE DW Co bopper | SAADRSHWdSHOLAN t= HSOOCDIA MP Woe | The mean rainfalls of Bombay and Madras are taken from 1824 to 1836; of Bombay, Madras, and Calcutta from 1832 to 1855; and of Bombay, Madras, Calcutta, and Nagpur from 1855 to 1867. 37. In the year of maximum sunspots the rainfall is somewhat below the average, and there seems to be a tendency toa double oscillation of the rainfall during the sunspot period, the principal maximum occurring a R 2 244 REPORT—1878. year or so before the epoch of maximum sunspots, with a small minimum and maximum between the principal maximum and the principal minimum. But this apparent irregularity may be owing to the fewness of the observations. The mean of the mean cycle is 60°3 inches, and of the rainfall for the whole period 59°3 inches. 38. In the next table the rainfall of Madras is omitted, but the general results are still the same. TapLeE XXII.—Rainfall of India.—Maximum years in 6th line. No. of 2 2 3 Stations Mane Mean | Rain | Spot |Yearsof SS jl €ans! Qycle | Var. | Var. | Cycle Ni 1824-36 | eee a 1855-67 in. in. | in. in. in. in. in. 1 34-0 62°4 61:3 45:2 50:7 a _ —_- — 2 72-2 66-0 69°5 58-2 66°5 | 62:0 | — 6:3 | — 37-2 1 3 78'5 69°6 57°9 51:2 64:3 | 664 | — 19 | — 22°8 2 4 81-0 74-0 75:2 51-4 704] 713 | +30) +4 44 3 5 122:0 66°7 74:2 58-4 80°3 | 72:7 | + 4:4 | + 33:0 4 6 65°6 | 54°11 | 67°3 53'1 | 60°0| 67°9 | — 0°4| + 43°83 5 7 719 51:9 92°7 69-0 71-4 | 69°3 | + 1:0 | + 3279 6 8 101°8 69°3 63:3 63-4 744 | 72:0 | + 3:7 | + 143 7 9 741 61:2 77°6 58-7 679 | 692 | +09 |— 2-9 8 10 714 65°8 75°3 52°9 66-4 | 67-2 | —11 | — 166 9 11 70°5 856 57:3 59-2 68:2 | 669 | —14]— 247] 10 12 62°6 61:3 74:3 61:7 650 | 66:8 | —15|— 240] 11 13 88-0 69°6 55'8 62°9 69-1 = 39. The next table gives the rainfall of Bombay and Madras from 1816 to 1838; of Bombay, Madras, and Calcutta from 1836 to 1861; and of Bombay, Madras, and Calcutta from 1860 to 1872. Taste XXIII.—Rainfall of India.—Minimum years in 8th line. No. of 5 ‘ a Stations x : : M Mean| Rain] Spot |2-9 ans! Cycle| Var. | Var. | oO | Years |1816—28/1826-838 1836-48]1849-61|1860-72 a in. in. in. in. in. in. in. in. ant 1 55:6 69-6 59°3. 751 46:7 | 61:3 — ~- — — 2 83:6 84:7 52°5 54-5 61:0 | 67°3 66:0 |+ 4:9 |4+23°3 i 3 78°6 79°9 52-0 73:2 571 | 68:2 66°71 }+ 5:0 |4+14°5 2 4 57:0 51-2 63-9 745 57-7 | 608 | 61:3 |+ 07]+ 48] 3 5 73°6 52-1 60:4 50°2 51:5 | 576 59°9 |— 1:2 |— 56 4 6 64:8 730 63°3 63°9 548 | 63:9 61-7 |+ 0°6 |—19:0 5 7 85°9 46°2 69°3 47-9 591 | 61:7 60°2 |— 0°9 |—32°5 6 8 441 | 54°2 | 57°6 | 59°0 | 53°3 |53°6 | 55°6|— 5'5|~37°1| 7 9 33'8 54:7 67°9 57-7 53°6 | 53°5 53°8 |— 7:3 |—25°4 8 10 64:1 52:0 51:2 56°9 49:5 | 54:7 57-7 |— 34 1+ 1:8 9 11 69-6 66-4 7607 63:2 634 | 67:9 63°9 | + 2°8 |4+30°9 | 10 12 84:7 569 76°5 50°3 578 | 65:2 65°6 |+ 4°5 |}4+44°8 | 11 13 79:9 515 63°1 63°7 63°9 | 64:4 The minimum rainfall occurs very nearly at the epoch of minimum sunspots, but there are still indications of a double oscillation. The mean for the cycle is 61:1 inches, and of the rainfall for the whole period 61:5 inches. ON SUNSPOTS AND RAINFALL. 245 40. For Bombay alone we have the following results :— TasLE XXIV.—Rainfall of Bombay.—Maximum years in 6th line. Years |1824-36|1832-44|1843_55/1855-67| Means eae elt ee Tru. in. in. in. iriewe | cane in. in. 1 | 3t0 | 741 | 593 | 412 | 521 | - we 29 | 792 | 71-4 | 654 | 669 | 687 | 633 | —90/—372| 1 3 | 735 | 705 | 547 | 51:3 | 637 | 665 | —5:8|—228| 2 4 | so} 626 | 739 | 624 | 700] 736 |4+13/+ 44] 3 5 |1220 1 880 | 760 | 77-2 | 908 | 796 |+73|+330| 4 6 65°6 64°6 75:9 62:1 67:0 75'S | +3°5 |+43°8 5 7 | 71-9] 508 | 1149 | 769 | 786 | 747 | +2414 329| 6 s |1018 | 736 | 502 | 736 | 748 | 761 | +38/+143] 7 9 | 741 | 631 | 911 | 77-7 | 765 | 730 |+07/—- 29] 8 10 | 71-4 | 71:5 | 693 | 456 | 644 | 704 | —19|—166| 9 1 | 705 | 952 | 626 | 778 | 765 | 72:0 | —03|— 247] 10 12 | 626 | 593 | s21 | 7841] 706 | 704} —1:9|—240] 11 ios) 880 | les4-} ‘4i-9.| 6938 || e42 |) — |) — Diss ORs The rainfall is at its maximum about a year before the time of maximum sunspots. The mean of the cycle is 72°3 inches, and of the rainfall for the forty-four years 71:4 inches. If the minimum years be placed in the eighth line, it will be found that the minimum rainfall occurs a little after the minimum of sunspots, and that it is eleven inches below the mean, but, generally, the variation is rather irregular. 41. The Madras rainfall gives the following results :— Taste XXV.—Madras.—Maximum years in 6th line. mn 3 Years S |1811~23|1824-36]1832-44/1843-55|1855~67|1865-77|Means| ean | VAN | op BH : yele| tion Cvel 'yele | in. in. in. in. in. in. in. in. Pie l-s3-7 | 184 | -60-3:| 999 | 40-6 aba | om oe fe 2| — | 560 |-371 | 65-4 | 47:0 | 51-4 | 51-4 | 453 | —32] 4 3| 451 | 607 | 390 | 381 | 529 | 244 | 434 | 483 | 02] 2 4] 394 | 884] 415 | 798 | 49:5 | 41-4 | 553 | 513 | +28] 3 5| 560 | 379 | 448 | 810 | 551 | 323 | 512 | 512 | 427] 4 6 41:2 36:9 49:3 54'8' 27°6 74:1| 47:3| 48:1; — 0-4 5 7| 636 | 324 | 523 | 398 | 372 | 563 | 469 | 487 | +02] 6 8| 762 | 443 | 531 | 369 | 382 | 73-7 | 537 | 504 | +19] 7 9| 363 | 184 | 586 | 643 | 546 | 51:8 | 473 | 515 | +30] 8 10| 700 | 371 | 583 | 727 | 472 | 629 | 580 | 507 | +22] 9 11| 471 | 390 | 365 | 388 | 41:6 | 37:1 | 395 | 45-4 | —31] 10 12| 596 | 41:5 | 50:3 | 43:2 | 51-4 | 215 | 446 | 491 | —64] U1 13| 266 | 448 | 65-4 | 323 | 244 | 450 |397 | — | — | — Here we have evidence of a double oscillation in the rainfall. The mean of the rainfall from 1813 to 1877, and also for the cycle is 48°5 inches. As a matter of fact, the Madras rainfall is below its mean when the sunspots are at their maximum. 42. The following results are obtained for Madras by the converse arrangement. 246 REPORT—1878. TasLe XXVI.—Madras.—Minimum years in 8th line. a 4 Years S /1816-28|1826-38]1836-48 1849-61/1860-72} Means | Ca" | Rain | Spot = 'ycle| Var. ar. | Cycle iF ane es in in in. in in in, i 1| 412 | 607 | 447 | 398 | 276 | 428] — | — | — | — 2| 636] 884] 493 | 369 | 372 | 551 | 51-7 |4+27|4 233] 1 3| 762 | 379 | 523 | 643 | 382 | 538 | 523 14+3:3\+ 145] 2 4| 363 | 369] 531 | 727 | 546 | 507 | 510 |+20\+ 48] 3 5| 700 | 324 | 586] 358 | 472 | 488 | 488 |-o2/— 56| 4 6| 471 | 443 | 583 | 432 | 41:6 | 469 | 455 |—35|-190] 5 7| 596 | 184 | 365 | 323 | 51-4 | 396 | 408 |—s2/—325| 6 8 26'°6| 37:1 | 50°3 47:0 24°24; 37:1 | 40°0 |— 9:0, — 37°1| 7 9| 337 | 390] 654 | 529 | 41-4 | 465 | 433 | 57/954] 8 10| 560 | 415 | 380 | 485 | 323 | 4341490 | oo|+ 18| 9 11] 60:7 | 448 | 798 | 551 | 741 | 629 | 57-4 | + 8-4/4 309 | 10 12| 884 | 495 | 81:0 | 276 | 563 | 605 | 588 | +9:8/4+ 448 | 11 13 | (379 | 623 | 648| 872 | 737 | sa! — |. — | tp The rainfall is least when the sunspots are fewest, and (apparently) greatest when the spots are most numerous, but this last result probably arises from the maximum years not being all in the same series. The mean rainfall of the cycle is 49-0 inches, and the mean rainfall from 1816 to 1872 is 49-1 inches. 43. The rainfall of Calcutta, as far as is known, is greater in the years of minimum than in those of maximum sunspots. VII.—Rainfall at Stations in the Southern Hemisphere compared with the Sunspots. 44, The observations obtained from this part of the world are few in number, and the periods also few, but the results, when compared with those of the northern hemisphere, are interesting. TasLeE XXVII.—Rainfall at five stations in the Southern Hemisphere, from 1855 to 1867.—Maximum year in 6th line. PD 2 3 ra i HH - ebecbe ies Se) | caeitee n a ‘3S 12) () 2 a5, é Ea hae Fie Ml tues wel a mete od) dese) Cee 3 | 8° Pal ies Malis fie cles ol Sef [eset | od) eel in. in. | in. in. in in in. in. 1855 42-7 | 24°6 | 23:1 | 28:2 | 52°8 | 34:3 — — 4 = 1856 46°2 | 21°9 | 24-9 | 29-7 | 43:3 | 33-2 | 33-5 |—O1 | — 39-2 1 1857 43°4 | 22-7 | 21°2 | 28:9 | 50°99 | 33:4 | 32°33 |—1:3 | — 22-7 2 1858 35°3 | 24:1 | 21°5 | 26:0 | 39°6 | 29°3 | 323 |—13] + 7:0 3 1859 72-1 | 36:7 | 14°8 | 21:8 | 42:0 | 37:5 | 36°38 |+ 3:2 | + 33°5 4 1860 57°3 | 29'1| 19°7 | 25°4| 82°8| 42°9 42:0 + 84 + 40°0 5 1861 87:1 | 25-4 | 25-1 | 29:1 | 58-4 | 45-0 | 40:0 |+ 6:4 | + 28:4 6 1862 36°0 | 32-0 | 22°9 | 22:1 | 24:0 | 27-4 | 33°6 00 | +118 7 1863 42-4 | 25:6 | 228 | 36:4 | 47-1 | 34:9 | 325 |—11/] — 02 8 1864 30°6 | 18:9 | 188 | 27-4 | 69:1 | 33:0 | 31-7 |—1:9 | — 76 9 1865 56-7 | 18-7 | 14:7 | 15:9 | 36:3 | 28:5 | 266 |— 7:0 | —17°8 10 1866 | 25:1 | 19-2 | 19-8 | 22-4 | 36:8 | 24-7 | 279 |— 5:7 | — 32°0 11 1867 | 42:0 | 23:0 | 19-2 | 25:8 | 59:7 | 33:9 — — — _ The rainfall and sunspots are at their maximum about the same time. ON SUNSPOTS AND RAINFALL. 247 The mean rainfall of the cycle is 33°6 inches, and for the years 1855 to 1867 it is 33°7 inches. 45. The next table gives the results obtained by the contrary arrange- ment. From 1848 to 1860 we have the rainfalls of the Cape, Adelaide, and Sydney; and from 1859 to 1871 the rainfalls of the same three stations, and of Mauritius, Brisbane, and Melbourne. Taste XXVIII.—Rainfall at three and six stations in Southern Hemi- sphere.—Minimum years in 9th line. Years | 1848-60 | 1859-71 | Means Hae Rain Var.| Spot Var. ea in. in. in. in. in. 1 313 34:5 32°9 = = = _— 2 23°8 42°8 33°3 34:7 + 2:0 + 40°5 1 3 32°6 46°1 39°3 34°8 + 21 + 23°8 2 4 28-7 26:3 27:5 32:3 — 0-4 + 94 3 5 31-4 39:0 35°2 32°6 — O1 — 19 4 6 31-4 34:2 32°8 311 —16 — 126 5 a 21°5 25:7 236 | 27-4 — 53 — 26:0 6 8 33°5 26:0 29-8 29°2 — 35 — 38°5 7 9 30°0 37°% 33°7 32°42 — 0-3 | — 38°6 s 10 31°6 33°8 32°7 33°0 + 0°3 — 18-9 9 11 28°4 37°9 33-1 34°4 +17 + 16°6 10 12 31-2 458 38°5 37-4 + 4:7 + 461 11 13 43-9 35°5 39°7 = = == = The minimum rainfall occurs about a year before the epoch of minimum sunspots, and (apparently) the maximum rainfall about the time of maximum sunspots. The mean for the cycle is 32°7 inches, and for the period 1848 to 1871 it is 32°9 inches. 46. The next two tables are formed by taking Australia alone for single sunspot periods. TapLbE XXIX.—Rainfall at four stations in Australia, from 1865 to 1877.—Maximum year in 6th line. Years |Brisbane|Melbourne|Adelaide |Sydney | Means Ms ah Sa er Heer in. in. in. in. in. 1865| 24-1 15:9 22-7 | — — = —_ 1866} 51:2 22-4 32°5 | 32-0 | — 5°7| — 39-7 1 1867| 61:0 25°8 41-4 | 36:0 | — 1:7| — 39°9 2 1868| 36:0 18:3 288 | 33:5 | — 4:2) — 169 3 1869| 54-4 24°6 35:2 | 37-3 | — 0-4) + 24:3 4 1870, 79°1 33°38 50:2 | 43°3 | + 5°6|/+ 56°9 5 1871| 45:4 30-2 37:8 | 40°3 | + 2°6| + 57°6 6 1872} 49:2 32°5 35:5 | 38°6 | + 09) + 381 7 1873| 62:0 25°6 456 | 41:0 | + 3°3| + 12°4 8 1874| 38-7 281 37-4 | 41-2 | + 3°5| — 13°9 9 1875; 67:0 32°9 44-4 | 39-1 | + 14| — 34-1 10 1876| 53-4 23:9 30:4 | 33-0 | — 4:7| — 45°0 11 1877| 31:2 24-1 26°5 | — — _ _— Considering the fewness of the observations, and the shortness of the period of observation, the results are rather remarkable. The variation is irregular; yet the maximum and minimum rainfalls occur at or near the epochs of maximum and minimum sunspots. 248 REPORT—1878. The mean rainfall for the cycle is 37-7 inches, and for the period 36:0 inches. 47. From the rainfalls at the same stations we get the following results for 1859 to 1871 :— TaBLE XXX.—Rainfall at four stations in Australia, from 1859 to 1871.—Minimum year in 9th line. Years | Brisbane Melbourne Adelaide| Sydney |Means Or ae nae oa fora in. in, in. in. in. in. in. 1859) 35-0* 21°8 14:8 42-0 28-4 — |— — — 1860} 54:6 25-4 19°7 82:8 45°6 | 41:2 |+ 49/4 33-0 1 1861} 69:4 29°1 25°1 584 45:5 | 40:2 |+ 3°9)+ 21-4 2 1862} 28-4 22-1 22-9 24-0 24:3| 34:5 |— 1:8/+ 4:8 3 1863} 68:8 36-4 22°8 47-1 43°8 | 381 |+ 1:8)— 7-2 4 1864 47:0 27-4 188 69-1 40°6 | 36:9 |+ 0°6)/— 14-6 5 1865) 24-1 15°9 14:7 36°3 22°7 | 28:7 |— 7:6)— 258 6 i} 1866} 37-2 22-4 19°8 36°8 29:0 | 30:5 |— 5:8|/— 39-0 7 (|1867) 61:0 25°83 19'2 $9°7 | 41°4) 35:1|—1°:2|/— 39°2 8 1868) 36-0 18°3 ile) 43°6 28°9 | 33°6 |— 2°7|/— 16-2 9 1869} 54:4 24:6 13°6 48°2 35-2 | 37:4 |+ 11/+ 25:0 | 10 1870) 79-1 33°8 23-9 64:5 503 | 43-4 |+ 7:1)+ 576] 11 1871} 45:4 30:2 23°5 52°1 37°8 — |} — — -- * Interpolated. The minimum rainfall took place about a year before the minimum sunspots, and the maximum rainfall about the time of maximum sunspots. The rainfall for the mean cycle is 363 inches, and 364 inches for the years 1859 to 1871. 48. As an example of the rainfall variation at a single station in the southern hemisphere, we may take the Cape observations. There are only two periods, but the results, as given in the next two tables, are significant. TaBLE XXXI.—Cape of Good Hope (Observatory).—Maximum years in 6th line. Years | 1843-55 | 1855-67 | Means ee Rain Var.| Spot Var. poke in. in, in. in, in. 1 24-8 246 247 = = = oe 2 18°8 21-9 20°3 2-7 | —23 | — 390 1 3 20:9 22°7 21:8 213 | —92 | —995 2 4 225 24-1 23-3 24-4 +04 | + 47 3 5 22-4 367 295 271 +31 | 43365 4 6 | 232 | 293 | 261 | 266 | +26/| +445] 5 7 24-6 25-4 25-0 27-2 +32 | +310 6 8 3355 32-0 32°7 28-3 443 | 4198 7 9 20°3 25:6 22-9 24-8 +08 | + 0-4 8 10 23-9 18:9 21-0 21-2 28 | — 86 9 ul 21-2 18-6 19-9 20:1 —39 | —207 | 10 12 20-0 192 | -19°6 207 | — 33.) sequen 13 246 22-9 23-7 is pa ee 23 The mean of the mean cycle is 24°0 inches, and 23:9 inches for the years 1843 to 1867. 49. The converse arrangement gives the following results :— ON SUNSPOTS AND RAINFALL. 249 Taste XXXII.—Cape of Good Hope (Observatory).—Minimum years in 8th line. Years | 1849-61 | 1860-72 | Means Oras oe he pee Ngee in. in, in. in in, 1 24-6 29-1 26°8 ee Esk Bal ct 2 3355 2-4 294 | 279 | +33 | + 230 1 3 20°3 32-0 61 | 265 | +19 | + 86 2 ar 23-9 25-6 a4 | 237 | —09 | — 27 3 5 21-2 18-9 Dively Al pacsow k | = Bed 4 6 20-0 18-7 193 | 201 | —45 | — 268 5 7 246 19-2 a9 | 213 | —33 | — 393 6 8 21:9 23°0 22'4 22'3 — 2:3 —39-4 7 9 22-7 29-9 998 | 940 | —o6 | — 19-7 8 10 24-1 32-3 29 | 279 | 433 | + 158 9 re 36-7 28-1 99-4 | 99-4," () 4. Be ley 455%. [4010 12 29-1 201 246 \ STO | 4 ee aera) | 11 13 25-4 29:3 27-3 Bs ES fe x The mean of the mean cycle is 24°6 inches, and the mean rainfall, from 1849 to 1872, is 24-9 inches. Tn both tables the rainfall and the sunspots are respectively below or above their means in the same years. VIII.—Oombinations of the preceding Results. 50. Combining some of the results now obtained, we get the following table, from which it will be seen that the maximum and minimum rainfalls apparently coincide with the maximum and minimum sunspots respectively. Taste XXXIITI.—Combination of Tables If1., VII., XVIII., XXI., and XXVII.—Maximum years in 6th line. n Contnt. Southern : : : Years es Pied of /America| India| Hemi- |Means a a. Hale Baob of va Europe sphere y : * | Cycle in, in. in. in. in. in. in. in 1| 29:1 26°6 41:3 45:3 | 34:3 35:3 | — _— = = 2} 29°5 26°6 36°5 61:0 | 33-2 37-4 | 36:7 |— 2:0 |— 38-7 1 3 28°8 23°6 412 57:9 33-4 37:0 | 37:8 |— 0°9 |— 22:8 2 4 31:9 25°7 43°6 68°8 29°3 39°9 | 39°5 |+ O'S |+ 57 3 5 | 33-2 26°5 41°6 68-4 | 37°5 41-4 | 40°6 |+ 1:9 |+ 33-2 4 6; 321 | 29°5 41°6 | 53°42) 42°9 /|39:9 | 40:6 |+ 1:9|+41°9 5 7 | 32°6 25°8 42°4 60:0 | 45:0 41:2 | 405 |+ 1:8 |+ 30°5 6 8 | 34-2 29-4 45:2 62°1 | 27:4 39°7 | 39-2 |+ 1-1 |+ 13:0 7 9] 297 | 26:3 416 59-4 | 34:9 38-4 | 38°9 |+ 02 |+ 1:5 8 10 | 34:8 26°9 412 60:9 33°0 39:4 | 38:2 |— 0°5 |— 12:1 9 ink 28:2 | ° 24-5 411 57:2 28°5 35°9 | 36°9 |— 1:8 |— 21:2 10 12 | 31-6 27-4 40-2 581 | 24:7 36-4 | 36°7 |— 2:0 |— 28:0 | 11 13 30°1 29°5 39°5 58°9 33°9 38-4 = == = Sr 51, All the preceding tables have been formed in the manner described in paragraphs 4, 5, and 7. 52. If it should be said that in the first half of the method the sunspots and the rainfall for the minimum years are too much dispersed, and that in the second half the sunspots and the rainfall for the maximum years are also too much dispersed, the reply would be that the method 250 REPORT—1878. gives well-marked sunspot cycles, and that in all the comparisons both the sunspots and the rainfall have been subjected to exactly the same treatment ; and it might be added that the amount of dispersion is much less than it would be in a method in which both the maximum and the minimum years were dispersed over more than one half of the common cycle. 58. In order, however, to remove such a possible objection, I will, as, far as possible, compare the rainfall with the sunspots, cycle by cycle, from 1823 to 1867. TaBLE XXXIV.—Comparison of rainfall with sunspots, from 1823 to 1834,—Maximum year (1829) in 7th line. nm o ‘=| Ygn 2 n ws) os Es ge / sss] ¢8 Boles fo) || ae a es 2 |eses |328 | 8S as a ei - @ 22 ss on | sex eS a S S AS 5 ao o Ho Oley iv) g nN © iva) oO o oS 2, on al oa | Oona an AN =| = G D ae) in. in. in. in. in. in in. 1823 311 26°4 49°8 44-1 37°38 | — — — — 1824 30.9 27:7 39-0 33°8 32°8 | 35:0 | — 50 | — 314), 1 1825 26°6 22°8 33-1 64:1 36:6 | 36°55 | — 35 | — 213 2 1826 23°7 21-4 45-2 69°6 400 | 410} +10) — 58 3 1827 29°5 27:0 50°1 84:7 | 478 | 447 | +47) + OF 4 1828 33°0 25°6 34:3 799 43°2 | 43°7 | + 3°7 | + 205 5 1829| 28°7 29°3 53:1 51°2 40°6) 40'9| + O'9) + 25°7 6 1830 30°8 23:0 51-0 52-1 39-2 | 41-4 | +14 | + 25:0 7 1831 32°3 29-4 52°6 730 | 46:8 41:9 | + 1:9] + 12:9 8 1832 26:2 22°1 45-2 46:2 34:9 | 385 | —15| — 98 9 1833 29-7 27:7 38°8 54-2 376 | 361 | — 39 | — 25:5} 10 1834 24°5 19:9 39-1 54-7 345 — as a —— The mean for the cycle is 40-0 inches, and for the whole period (1823 to 1834), the mean is 39°3 inches. The rainfall reaches its maximum about two years before the year of maximum sunspots, and its minimum at the time of minimum sun- spots. There is, apparently, a tendency to a double oscillation in the rainfall. The mean cycle corresponds with the years 1824 to 1833. 54, The variation for each country is given in the following table. Table XXXV.—Rainfall variations from 1824 to 1833. Years of Great Continent Cycle Britain | of Europe America India Mean Var.} Spot Var. 1 + 08 + 08 — 43 -—171 — 5:0 — 31-4 2 — 21 —17 — 69 — 31 — 3°5 — 21:3 3 — 3:2 — 2-2 — 11 + 11:0 +11 — 58 4 — 01 -—O1 + 0-4 + 18-7 + 47 + OFT 5 + 2:0 +155 — 16 + 12-9 +37 + 20°5 6 + 1:3 + 1:5 + 3:3 — 24 + 09 + 25:7 7 +16 + 08 + 74 — 39 +15 + 25:0 8 + 14 + 06 + 58 0:0 +19 + 12°9 9 — 0-4 0-0 + 0:9 71 -— 16 — 98 10 — 15 —10 — 41 — 87 — 38 — 25°5 ON SUNSPOTS AND RAINFALL. 251 It will be seen that the variations for Great Britain and the Continent are nearly alike, and that those for America and India show a tendency to a double oscillation. 55. Taking now the sunspot period 1833 to 1844, we get the follow- ing table :— Taste XXXVI.—Comparison of rainfall with sunspots from 1833 to 1844,— Maximum year (1837) in fifth line. g re 2 > E A 3 H Pa aie ae) eeamby sewed ahs | Beets S gas (sss Re a3 a a 22 meee eae! | pela lee.) 8 Z oe oe Sloane oss: | 4S Fen = = s eS in. in. in. in in. in. in 1833 29-4 28°8 39°6 56°4 38°5 es — _— — 1834 25°8 22-0 35°3 59°3 35°6 | 369 | —1°9 | — 356 1 1835 29-0 24-1 36°7 63°2 38:2! 380] —08 | + 33 2 1836 34:2 27°6 39°1 59-4 401 | 385 | —0O3 |) + 49-1 3 1837 26°2 28'7 35°4 52°'5 35°7| 36°9| — 1:9 | + 64°7 4 1838 28-4 27:8 37°3 52-0 36°4 | 373 |} —1:5 | + 47°6 5 1839 32-1 30°7 37:2 63°9 41:0 | 39-2 + 04 | + 23°8 6 1840 25°3 27°9 40:2 60:4 38-4 | 400] +12) + 20 ff 1841 34:1 28°5 43°8 63°3 42-4) 40:9 +21; —189)| 8 1842 24-9 26°1 41°5 69°3 404 | 408 | + 2:0 | — 349 9 1843 29°7 30°3 42°5 57°6 40:0 | 40-0 +12 | — 42:2; 10 1844 24:3 30°5 36-2 68:2 39°8 — — — —_— The years of the mean cycle are 1834 to 1843. The mean rainfall for the cycle is 38°8 inches, and for the years 1833 to 1844 it is 38°9 inches. The rain increases from the first to the third year of the cycle, but in the fourth decreases, rising again till the eighth year, and then falling to the tenth. This indicates a double oscillation, as in Table XXXIV. The general results of the comparison, however, are unfavourable, the maximum rainfall coinciding nearly with the minimum sunspots in the ninth year, and the minimum rainfall with the maximum sunspots in the fourth year of the cycle. It will be seen by inspecting the columns for the mean rainfalls of the several countries that these unsatisfactory results are mainly due to the rainfalls of America and India, which are represented by ten and three stations respectively. 56. Taking Great Britain and the Continent of Europe alone, the results as given in next table are obtained. The mean for the cycle and also for the years 1833 to 1844 is 28°2 inches. The maximum rainfall occurs two years after the year of maximum sunspot. The minimum rainfall occurs, first, in the year of minimum sunspot at the commencement of the cycle, and, again, nearly in the year of minimum sunspot at the end of the cycle. There is a tendency to a small second minimum about the time of maximum sunspot. 252 REPORT—1878. Table. XXXVII.—Comparison of the Rainfall of Europe with the sun- spots from 1833 to 1844.—Maximum year (1837) in 5th line. Years Baa Mean Cycle| Rain Var. Spot Var. oral Re in. in. in. 1833 29°1 — —_ - — 1834 23°9 25°8 — 24 — 35:6 1 1835 26°5 26°9 — 1:3 + 33 2 1836 30°9 28°9 + 07 + 49-1 ae 1837 27°4 28'4 +0°2 +64'7 4 1838 28:1 28:7 + 0°5 + 476 5 1839 31°4 29°3 +11 + 23'8 6 1840 26°6 28:9 + 07 + 2:0 df 1841 31:3 28°6 + 0-4 — 18:9 8 1842 25°5 28:0 — 0-2 — 34-9 9 1843 30:0 28:2 0-0 — 42:2 10 1844 27-4 — — — — As these results, derived from the rainfalls at thirty-seven stations are decidedly favourable, the results in Table XXXVI. must be regarded as only partially unfavourable. 57. For the next sunspot cycle we get the following results :— Taste XXXVIII.—Comparison of rainfall with sunspots from 1843 to 1857.—Maximum year (1848) in 6th line. aH | _ ale 8| 8 | a | ea 3 Bj) BEs (Son se | Se |Se eg i eS ee ere 6 (oe? (ee?) o@ | ce |ebo) 8 | 8 |g lee les bh |Omn ORR 4 ES o |ania| & = ee mn |HO Tk cP fens aae in. in. in. in. in. in. 1843 | 31:8 | 29: 49-9: | BPG | 81-0) | “86S | Oi — |— 1844 | 269 | 300 | 37-4 | 682 | 17°38 | 36:1] 35°38 |—1:8 |—310.| 1 1845 | 333 | 31:3 | 382 | 51:2 | 19:9 | 348) 368 |—0O-8 |—147| 2 1846 | 35:1 | 298 | 41:5 | 767 | 24-7 | 41:6] 396 |+ 20/4102] 3 1847 | 286 | 267 | 455 | 765 | 25:0 | 40:5 | 40:2 |4+ 2614+ 41-3] 4 1848 37°3 30°5 | 40°'0 63°11 | 21°5 | 38°5 | 39'2 |+ 1°6 | +571 5 1849 | 306 | 27:2 | 39:0 | 75:1 | 25:0 | 394 | 38-7 |+ 11 |+428] 6 1850 | 29:9 | 31:2 | 46:5 | 545 | 264 | 37:7| 384 |+ 08 /+ 210] 7 1851 | 29:3 | 306 | 367 | 73:2 | 255 | 391 | 39-4 |+18/+ 87] 8 1852 | 39:0 | 282 | 431 | 745 | 253 | 420 | 395 |+1:9/— 18] 9 1853 | 309 | 296 | 39:9 | 50:2 | 241 | 349 | 36-7 |— 0-9 |— 15-9 | 10 1854 | 284 | 27:0 | 389 | 639 | 17-7 | 35:2) 347 |~ 2-9 |— 31-5 | 11 1855 | 25:5 | 30:7 | 41:1 | 47-9 | 23-9 | 33:8 | 34-6 |— 3-0 |— 43-2 | 12 1856 | 31:4 | 29:0 | 35:4 | 59°0 | 23-4 | 35:6 | 34-9 |— 2-7 |— 43-3 | 13 1857 | 29:3 | 295 | 42:3 | 57-7 | 219 | 347] — | — i} — For the above period (1843-57) we have two stations in the southern hemisphere, namely, the Cape and Adelaide. The Melbourne and Sydney observations cannot be used, because in the former there is a blank for the years 1851 to 1854, and because the latter were not commenced till ae the observations previously to that year having been made at Sonth ead. ON SUNSPOTS AND RAINFALL. 253 The mean for the cycle is 37°6 inches, and 37°4 inches for the years 1843 to 1857. The maximum rainfall occurs about one year before the year of maximum sunspots, and the minimum rainfall in the years of minimum sunspots at the beginning and end of the cycle. There is apparently a tendency to a double oscillation, the rainfall diminishing a little from the fourth to the seventh year of the cycle, and then increasing a little to the ninth year. 58. The following table shows the variation for each country or district. Table XXXIX.—Rainfall variations from 1844 to 1856. Continent Southern cae Grea of America India Hemi- ey ta Europe sphere ij in. in. in, in. in. in. if —16 + 0-9 — 1:5 — 26 — 40 — 18 — 31:0 2 + 08 + 1:4 — 16 — 21 — 2°6 — 08 — 14-7 3 +17 + 0:2 + 1:2 + 63 + O-4 + 2:0 + 10:2 4 +11 — 08 +27 + 9:3 + 0:9 + 2:6 + 41:3 5 + 21 — 05 + O07 + 5:5 + O-1 +16 + 57-1 6 + 0:8 — 0-2 +07 + 3:0 + 1:3 +11 + 42:8 7 —14 + 0:8 +17 + 0-4 + 27 + 08 + 21:0 8 + 05 + 09 + 03 +49 + 2:5 + 1:8 + 87 9 + 3:2 —O1 + 0:3 + 4:2 +19 + 1:9 — 18 10 + 1:0 — 06 0-0 — 42 — 03 — 08 — 159 11 — 3:0 — O07 — 07 — 75 — 2:3 — 2:8 — 31°5 12 - 36 + O1 —13 — 93 — 09 — 3:0 — 43-2 13 —1:9 — 1-4 = 29 — 80 0:0 — 27 — 43:3 In Great Britain the maximum and minimum rainfalls are respectively in or very near the years of maximum and minimum sunspots, but there seems to be a tendency to a double oscillation. The variation for the Continent of Europe is, on the whole, unfavour- able. This arises from heavy rains having occurred at a good many stations in 1844 and 1845, Both in America and in India the maximum rainfall occurs one year before the year of maximum sunspots, and the minimum rainfall in the years of minimum sunspots, with, however, a tendency to a second minimum and maximum between the principal maximum and mini- mum. The variation of the mean rainfall of the two stations in the southern hemisphere is similar to the variations of the rainfalls of Great Britain, America, and India. 59. Coming now to the next sunspot cycle, 1856 to 1867, we get the results as given in Table XL. Not having the rainfalls of the ten American stations for 1868, I have taken the thirteen years 1855-67 instead of the years 1856-68. The mean rainfall for the cycle is 38°4 inches, and 38°5 inches for the years 1855-67. The years of maximum and minimum rainfall coincide with the years of maximum and minimum sunspots, except in the eleventh year of the cycle, and there is little or no appearance of a double oscillation. 254 REPORT—1878. Taste XL.—Comparison of Rainfall with Sunspots from 1855 to 1867.— Maximum year in 6th line. a 5 a comet bpd ie 2b an ee Exe) wu ‘ g|ags|22| 2 |EBe|. | 212 | = |: 2 lassless| Bo | $8 |S HS! 8 = ae ee pee a |on2/1a Sn |2Ba| & 5 3 eit o HHS BABS Ho ge 5 on o o = e a pm |omMn |ORs!] a5 Sa [ato] & P=) °Gj nm |PO in. in. in, in in. in. in in 1855 27°1 27°2 42-4 42:0 34:3 34°6 —_ — — — 1856 35:0 25°1 35°6 55:4 33°2 36°9 | 36:2 |— 2:2 |— 39-7 1 1857 32°5 19°7 46:0 51:7 33-4 36°7 | 366 |— 1°8 |— 39:9 2 1858 34:1 22°1 46:0 50°6 29°3 36°4 | 37°6 |— 0°8 |— 16:9 3 1859 37:0 26°1 477 57°6 37°5 41:2 | 39°3 |+ O99 | + 24:3 4 1860| 36'1 29°24 | 37°8 46'7 | 42°9 | 38°6| 40°3 |+ 1°9'|+56'9 5 1861 40°7 251 42-4 61:0 45:0 42°8 | 40°9 |+ 2°5 |+ 57°6 6 1862 42°7 26°3 44-4 BY Gil 27-4 39°6 | 40°4 |+ 2°0 |+ 381 7 1863 38°2 24:5 44:3 577 34:9 39°9 | 39:0 |+ 06 |+ 12°4 8 1864 36°1 23°4 39°2 515 33-0 36°6 | 37-4 |— 1:0 |— 13°9 4) 1865 32°5 22°5 44:0 54°8 28°5 36°5 | 36:9 |— 1:5 |— 34:1 | 10 1866 40:0 27°71 40°7 591 24°7 38°3 | 38:1 |—0°3 |— 45:0 | 11 1867 371 29°2 42°8 53°3 33°9 39°3 — — — — 60. The variations for the several countries are as follows :-— Taste XLI.—Rainfall Variations from 1855 to 1867. Years of |} Great | Cont. of : . Southern Mean Spot Cycle | Britain | Europe sae a eae Hemisphere] Variation | Variation in. in. in. in in in. 1 — 41 — 05 — 2°8 — 33 — 0:3 — 22 — 39°7 2 — 3:0 — 31 + O07 — 21 —1°5 —18 — 39:9 3 — 21 — 2-2 + 37 —18 — 155 — 08 — 169 4 — 05 +12 + 21 — 13 + 3:0 + 0°9 + 24:3 5 + 0:9 + 2°8 —13 — 14 + 8:2 + 19 + 569 6 + 3°5 + 1:7 —10 + 2:0 + 6:2 + 2:5 + 57-6 if + 4:5 + 08 + 11 +38 — 02 + 2:0 + 38:1 8 + 2°3 — 01 + 03 + 1:6 —13 + 06 + 12-4 9 — 0:8 — 12 —11 — 06 1°5 + 1:0 — 13°9 10 —13 — 09 — 08 + 0°6 — 5:2 —15 — 341 itt + 0:9 + 17 — 07 + 21 — 59 — 0-4 — 45:0 In Great Britain the rainfall increases to the seventh year of the cycle and on the Continent to the fifth year, after which it decreases to the tenth and ninth years, and then increases in the eleventh. The rainfall at the American stations has, apparently, a tendency to a double oscillation. At the Indian stations the rainfall increases to the seventh year as in Great Britain. It then decreases to the ninth year, but increases in the tenth and eleventh years. The mean rainfall of the five stations in the southern hemisphere increases from the second to the fifth year, and then decreases to the eleventh, and the maximum and minimum rainfall occur in or very near the years of maximum and minimum sunspots. 61. Omitting the stations in the southern hemisphere, the mean variation for Europe, America, and India is given in column one of the ON SUNSPOTS AND RAINFALL. 255 following table; in column two the mean variation for Europe and America is given ; and in column three the variation for Europe alone is given. 1 2 3 a ee Spot Var. Years of Rain Var. | Rain Var. | Rain Var. Cycle in. in. in. — 2-7 — 2°5 — 2:3 — 39:7 1 — 13 —1°8 -— 30 — 39:9 2 — 06 — 01 — 21 — 16°9 3 + O04 + 0-9 + 0:3 + 24:3 4 + 02 + 0°8 + 1:8 + 56°9 5 +15 + 14 + 2°6 + 576 6 + 2°5 + 21 + 2°6 + 38-1 7 + 1:0 + 0'8 + 11 + 124 8 — 0:9 — 10 — 10 — 13°9 9 — 06 — 10 —11 — 341 10 + 1:0 + 0°6 +13 — 45:0 11 Each of these variations shows that the sunspots and rainfall were below or above their means in the same years, except the eleventh. This exception is owing to heavy rains at some stations in Great Britain in 1866, on the Continent in 1867, and at Bombay in 1865 and 1866. On the other hand, the rainfall at the stations in the southern hemis- phere was greatly below the average in 1865-66-67. Hence the mean rainfall variation for all the stations (Table XL.) is a closer approximation to the sunspot variation than the variations in the above table. 62. The seventy-nine stations in Table XL. include almost all the principal observatories in the world. If we take the latter alone, we get the following results :— Taste XLII.—Rainfall at forty Observatories from 1855 to 1867. Years. Brea Mean Cycle | Rain Var. Spot Var. Dede in. in. in, 1855 29-2 — — — — 1856 29:2 28°3 — 05 — 39:7 1 1857 25°7 26°7 — 21 — 39:9 2 1858 26°2 27:2 — 16 — 169 3 1859 30°7 29°9 + 11 + 24:3 4 1860 32:0 31-4 + 2°6 + 56:9 5 1861 311 30°9 + 21 + 576 6 1862 29°7 29°9 + 11 + 38-1 7 1863 29:4 28°8 0:0 + 12-4 8 1864 26:9 27'5 -— 13 — 13°9 9 1865 26'8 27:3 — 15 — 341 10 1866 29:0 28°7 — 01 — 45:0 11 1867 30:2 — —_ — —_ 63. Taking only ten observatories, as widely separated as possible, the results as given in next table are obtained. 64, The comparisons which have now been made between the rainfall and the sunspots for each of the four cycles from 1824 to 1867 are not liable to any objection that may be founded on the plea of a dispersion of 256 - - REPORT—1878. the years of maximum and minimum in the previous comparisons, and yet the results are similar. It may be urged, however, that the “mean cycle” is formed by ‘“‘bloxaming” the “ means.”’ But this objection, Taste X LITI.—Rainfall at ten Observatories from 1855 to 1867. n of o Z a E oy 5 2 2 2 on ad as a FI SS H o Years| 2 E a1 ae |e | 3 By) cae ieee Ss 6 Bee | alee | Be dve-| || Sie @ | ae etd | Sea a| Feay ig Sh cms lees eS] ei Ol Mesa Sole Ome ‘S 8 HAIB ISA IAI42P/OH |/Alaelol;/a lala] a | kw Tale echo peaaly |fpnbely Rea in. in. | in.| in.} in.| in. | ing] in, 1855 | 15:2) 20°3] 138°5| 25-4) 36°4 | 47°6 | 41:2) 42°6) 24-6) 28-2) 29-5) — | — | — 1856 | 12°2] 28°5| 22°3) 27-2) 33-0 | 53°8 | 65:9) 46-2) 21-9) 29°7| 34-1] 32-5] — 2.0] 1 1857 | 12:6] 24:9) 19-4| 26-6) 38:6 | 57°9 | 51:3) 43-4) 22°7| 28-9) 32-6) 32-7) — 1:8] 2 1858 | 11-8] 24°3) 18-3) 24:8) 42:4 | 45-4 | 62-4) 35-3) 24-1] 26-0) 31:5) 34:0) — 0°5| 3 1859 | 15°8| 25:9] 21°5| 28:3) 48°9 | 59-3 | 77-2) 72-1) 36-7| 21-8] 40°7/ 37-0] + 2°5| 4 1860 | 15-3] 33°4| 25:8) 19:4] 38°3 | 45-1 | 62-1) 57-2| 29-1) 25-4) 35:1) 37-7] + 3-2) 5 1861 | 18-0} 28-6) 18:0) 22:5) 44°7 | 50°3 | 76:9) 87-1) 25-4| 29-1) 40-1) 37-6] + 31! 6 1862 | 13:5] 33-9] 20:3) 21:6] 41-4 | 57-2 | 73-6) 36:0] 32-0) 22-1) 35-2| 36°7) + 2-2) 7 1863 | 16°6| 25:6) 16°8) 23:4) 44-4 | 56:4 | 77-7| 42-4) 25-6) 36-4/ 36°5| 34:2} —0°3] 8 1864 | 20:7] 28:1) 14:4| 24-1) 39°5 | 39:4 | 45-6) 30-6) 18:9] 27-4| 28-9] 32-2) — 2:3] 9 1865 | 18:3) 23°6| 21-4) 26:1) 44:6 | 43°6 | 77-8) 56°7| 18°6] 15-9) 34:7) 32:3) — 2:2] 10 1866 | 26-4| 27-2) 25:4) 12-2) 38:5*| 35-5*| 78-4| 25-1) 19-2) 22-4) 31-0) 32°5) — 2:0} 11 1867 | 25°2| 31:0) 22°2/17:0| 45°6 | 41°7 | 62-3) 42-0) 22-9) 25:8) 33-6) — } — = * JInterpolations. also, if it is one, may be removed by making a direct comparison. Taking the thirteen “means” given in Tables III., VII, XVIII, XXI., and XXVIL., we get the following results :— Taste XLIV.—Direct Comparison of the Rainfall with the Sunspots.— Maximum years in 6th line. ) é ao o qd a oO Pa a 2 | 3 lie | S Y oie ie s & re 5 a = Rr lset hex Leg [ly gy. sac) 8 01° we Mees ica |) ORG] as A we S ee RB ~ in. Thee in. in. in. in. in. 1 29-1 26°6 41:3 45°3 34:3 35:3 | —3:2 | — 351 =e 2 29°53 26°6 36°5 61:0 33°2 374 | —11 — 371 1 3 28°8 23°6 41-2 57°9 33-4 3870 | —1:5 |] — 21°6 2 4 31:9 25°7 43°6 68°8 29°3 39°9 | + 1:4 + 83 3 5 33°2 26°5 41°6 68°4 37°5 414 | +29] + 43:8 4 6 32'1 29°'5 | 41°6 53°4 42:9 39°'9 +14] +55°6 5 a 32°6 25°8 42°4 60°0 45:0 41:2 | + 2-7 + 36:3 6 8 34:2 29°4 45:2 62-1 27°4 39°7 | +12] + 188 7 9 29-7 26°3 41°6 59-4 34:9 384 | —O1 + 03 8 10 348 26°9 41:2 60°9 33°0 394 | +09 |] — 99 9 11 28°2 24:5 41-1 57-2 28°5 359 | —26| — 206 10 12 316 27°4 40°2 58-1 24-7 364 | —21|] — 23°6 11 13 301 29°5 39°5 58:9 33°9 38-4 | —O1 | — 153 — The mean rainfall is 38°5 inches, and the mean of the sunspot numbers is 48:1. Now, the rainfall and the sunspots are below or above their respective ON SUNSPOTS AND RAINFALL. 257 means almost in the same years of the common period, and the epochs of maximum and minimum sunspots coincide nearly with the epochs of minimum and maximum rainfall. IX.— Summary of Results. 65. If we knew exactly the annual rainfall for the whole globe during the four sunspot periods 1824-67, and found that it varied as the sun’s Spotted area varied, we should conclude that there was very strong evidence of a causal connection between the two phenomena, especially when it was considered that the comparative frequence or absence of solar spots, facule, and prominences indicated a variation in the sun’s radiant energy, upon which the variations in terrestrial meteorology mainly depend. But as we do not know the total annual rainfall over the whole surface of the earth, and have only approximate values of the annual amounts of solar maculation, all that can be done is to compare the rain- fall at the greatest possible number of stations in different parts of the world with the available values of the sunspot areas, and see whether there is anything approaching to a correspondence. This has been done in the preceding pages, chiefly for the years 1824-67, and the principal results may be summarised as follows :— (1.) The mean rainfalls of Great Britain, the Continent of Europe, America, and India, as represented by all the returns that have been re- ceived, have, notwithstanding some anomalies, varied as Wolf’s sunspot numbers have varied, and the epochs of minimum and maximum rainfall have nearly coincided with those of the sunspots. (2.) The rainfall at five stations in the southern hemisphere for shorter periods give similar results. (3.) The levels of the principal rivers of Central Europe have also varied with the sunspots, although, as in the case of the rainfall, there are discrepancies. (4.) The rainfalls at individual stations, such as Hdinburgh, Paris, New Bedford, Bombay, &c., afford unmistakable evidence of a connection between sunspots and rainfall. (5.) The variations in the levels of individual rivers of Central Europe, such as the Rhine and Elbe, give similar evidence. (6.) The results obtained by taking each sunspot cycle separately are all favourable, with the exception of those for the cycle 183443, which are unfavourable for ten stations in America and three stations in India, but favourable for thirty-seven stations in Europe. (7.) When the final results for each country are combined, by taking means of all of them (Table XXXIIT.), it is found that the rainfall and the sunspots are below or above their respective means in the same years, and that the epochs of maximum and minimum rainfall apparently coin- cide with the epochs of maximum and minimum sunspots. (8.) The mean range of rainfall variation for the four cycles from 1824 to 1867, taking all the stations, is about 4 inches, and the annual mean rainfall 38°5 inches. (9.) There is a tendency to a double oscillation in the rainfall, a small second maximum and minimum occurring after the principal maximum. This is especially the case in India. (10.) The principal maximum and minimum epochs of the rainfall do not oo at the same time in different countries, but oscillate to the ° s 258 REPORT—1878. extent of a year or two on either side of the sunspot epochs. On an average, however, the rainfall epochs occur somewhat later than the sun- spot epochs. 66. The rainfall and sunspot observations being themselves probably but rough approximations, the evidence of*a connection between them is necessarily qualitative rather than quantitative. But, considering how apparently capricious an element the rainfall is, it is difficult to account for the results which have been obtained for widely distant countries and under all conditions of climate, except upon the supposition that they are the manifestations of a general law. The number of rainfall returns is no doubt small, but it is to be remembered that they are all that are available, that they are not a selection, and that virtually they have been obtained by haphazard. Moreover, the experience of seven years has shown that as the number of rainfall returns increased, so did the evidence of a connection between sunspots and rainfall. 67. The present discussion has been almost exclusively confined to the four cycles from 1824 to 1867, because it is supposed that the sunspot observations for those years are superior to earlier observations. But it must be remarked that exactly similar results have been obtained for previous cycles. The rainfall variations for the cycle 1811-23 show a most marked coincidence with the sunspot variations, and similar rainfall results have been obtained for still earlier cycles. Further, the variations | in the levels of the Elbe from 1728 to 1868, and in those of the Rhine from 1770 to 1835 were as favourable in the last century as they have been in the present. The cycle 1868-78 is not yet complete, but judging from the rainfalls in 1870-73, and from the droughts which have occurred since 1875, it is not improbable that the general results will be the same as for previous cycles. We know already that the mean rainfall at six stations in the southern hemisphere from 1865 to 1877 is favourable. Report on Observations of Luminous Meteors during the Year 1877— 78, by a Committee consisting of Jamus Guatsumr, F.RS., &c., Re oP. "Gane, 7 .GIS., “FORAS:, “C. Brooke, J 2i8e. erate G. Forses, F.R.S.L., Watrer Fricut, D.Sc., F.G.S., and Prof. A. S. Herscuzr, M.A., F.R.A.S., (Reporter). Tur meteoric events of the greatest interest during the past year, of which, as far as space will permit, the principal characters are described in this Report, consist in part of the successive appearances of a rather unusual number of very grand and remarkable fireballs which have been seen in different parts of England, Scotland, and Ireland, and which have been very satisfactorily recorded in those countries; and in part also of some new observations of meteor showers, and of some falls of aérolites, which have added to the increasing store of knowledge of the nature and dis- tribution of those astronomical phenomena which we possess. A stonefall of considerable abundance and importance took place on the 18th of October, 1877, at Soko-Banja, N.E. of Alexinatz, the circum- OBSERVATIONS OF LUMINOUS METEORS. 259 stances of which, as far as they are yet known and investigated, will be found described in the Appendix treating of Aérolites and of the pro- gress of recent researches on them, at the end of the Report. Of similar events and of large fireballs observed in foreign countries, the Committee has also to record some other announcements which it has received. A detonating meteor of unusual magnitude made its appearance in the United States on the afternoon of November 20th, 1877, and was one of unusual grandeur. As it was visible at Richmond and at towns of Vir- ginia and North Carolina, where it exploded, all of them near the capital, and was also seen by many persons in Washington itself, the inquiry undertaken by Professor J. L. Campbell, of the Washington and Lee University, regarding all the special characters of the great Virginia meteor already in part successfully accomplished will, without doubt, con- tribute some important additions to this department of our meteoric knowledge. A fireball of the same description, scarcely less imposing, appeared (a few days after the former one) in England on the evening of the 23rd of November last, and was carefully described by a multitude of accounts of it which were preserved, and which were communicated to Captain Tupman. It appears to have been a member of a very well-known meteor shower, whose shooting stars have often afforded plentiful and pretty striking exhibitions in November, with a definite centre of divergence in the head of Taurus. The “ Taurids I.,” as they have been called, were very abundant in November, 1876, amounting to bright showers, especially on the morning of November 20th in that year ; but they were remarkable by a nearly total cessation of the stream last year in the month when this great fireball appeared to compensate, apparently, for the absence of the lesser meteors of the shower. It is premature, until future cases of a similar kind corroborate such a conclusion, to infer that aérolitic meteors are sometimes furnished by ordinary star-showers, since radiant points of very different and independent meteor systems are some- times found to be closely adjacent to each other ; but the evidence thus presented of such a connection existing between a meteor shower and an aérolitic fireball certainly demands close attention and investigation, by the certain determination which was made last year of an almost exact resemblance between two such foreign visitants in the positions of their radiant points. The orbit of a certain comet, it may be noticed (that of 1702), coincides, as far as the rough observations of it that were obtained will perhaps allow us to conclude, with the date and position of this double meteor radiant-point ; and not less likelihood exists that the comet and the two kinds of meteor-bodies formed members together of a common system coursing round the sun, than that the aérolitic meteor itself was only a very large individual of the meteor shower. Captain Tupman has com- puted, on the other hand, the orbit of a smaller fireball which he saw on the night of the 27th of November, 1877; and this meteor, he discovered, had a nearly circular orbit, slightly inclined to the earth’s, which it was overtaking with a periodic time of revolution round the sun of only about 462 days. A large fireball was seen in full sunlight on the forenoon of March 25th, 1878, travelling over the North Sea from the neighbourhood of Berwick to that of Aberdeen. Its height and real path were very well determined, and this large fireball appears to have been directed in its real orbit very nearly straight from the sun towards the earth. The next s 2 260 REPORT— 1878. large meteor seen shot from over the north of Yorkshire to the Firth of Forth, where it disappeared at a height of 15 or 20 miles very nearly over Edinburgh, on the evening of May 12th, 1878. A report like thunder heard at Galashiels, seems to have resulted from a division of the fireball, seen at Scarborough, by a fragment falling from it some time before the end of its course, when it must have been passing over Galashiels at a distance of about 35 or 40 miles. It belonged to a radiant point in Virgo, very probably identical with that of a new and rich shower of April and May shooting stars, seen by Mr. Denning (and perhaps also, on April 18, 1841, by Professer Forshey, in America) at about 205°-10°, in 1877. A fireball descended with a detonation to a low height over a point near Market Harborough; on April 2nd, 1878. It was well observed at two places, and its radiant-point in Ursa Major was very well determined. A large fireball which passed slowly over Devonshire on the 7th of June, from the English to the Bristol Channel, probably had the same radiant point, with one or two companion fireballs on the same evening, as the detonating meteor (investigated by Professors Galle and Von Niessl) of June 17th, 1873, in Austria and Bohemia. Of this fireball and of one seen on the night of July 29th over the neighbourhood of Manchester, however, the heights, real courses, and velocities have only been very partially established from the observations. Among the chief annual meteor showers observed during the past year, all but the April Lyrids were pretty notable displays, denoting well- marked returns of the several special star-showers of the year. The August display of Perseids, in the year 1877, was as bright as, or perhaps a little brighter than the average; but not much more so (if even quite . so bright as usual) in August, 1878, the state of the sky at some places being, on August 10th, in both years, very fairly favourable for the observations. The Orionids were well seen, and reached a maximum of 22 meteors per hour on the morning of October 18th, 1877; the meteors were bright, leaving very characteristic streaks, and radiated very exactly from the point near y Orionis, which is the usual centre of the shower. The Leonids were re-observed in England and in America, where two observers counted thirty of them per hour on the morning of November 14th. The Andromedes were seen both on November 25th and 27th, about as numerous as the unconformable meteors on those nights. The Geminids appeared in greater numbers than usual, reaching a maximum on December 11th, 1877, which was well seen, and the characters and radiant point of the shower were last year very well ob- served. The meteors of January 2nd also made their appearance in a pretty bright stream, seen in England to be very active on the morning of that day, and affording a pretty good new determination of its radiant- point. Among these regular returns of special showers, the display of the Lyrids of April 19th—21st, in the year 1878, was, on the other hand, somewhat scanty, and inferior to those of the other showers; only a few of its meteors being noticed, and those on the nights of the 21st and 22nd of April, principally, when the meteor shower of the Lyrids ordinarily is well-nigh extinguished. Throughout the autumn months, in the spring, and again on the ap- proach of the August meteors, Mr. W. F. Denning recorded appearances of meteor showers in watchful observations of the sky whenever the ab- sence of the moon and freedom from clouds offered opportunities for their detection. Of such showers, many were new, and presented other features OBSERVATIONS OF LUMINOUS METEORS. 261 of especial interest. A selection of the brightest and most important examples of these new views of meteor systems obtained by Mr. Denning during the past year is included in the third Appendix, following the above notices of the greater annual showers, with extracts from his list of the almost innumerable shower centres of which he succeeded in tracing and recording the existence. From the meteor lists of foreign observers, also, Mr. Denning deduced a vast number of meteor showers, and he has published a list of them in conjunction with that of his own observations. In these two parallel lists the agreements are often very satisfactory and close. Mr. Greg has prepared a valuable abstract of them, showing the many points in which these new results confirm and verify the results of older observations. A similar abstract by Mr. Greg of the extensive shower-catalogue contained in the late Professor Heis’ forty-three-year summary of his meteor observations, which was published last year, accompanies the former abstract; and to these lists is added, in the same part of this Report, the well-known catalogue of meteor showers deduced by Professor Schiaparelli from Zezioli’s observations of shooting-stars at Bergamo in the years 1867-69, of which no perfect transcript has hitherto appeared in these Reports. Fhe The fourth and last Appendix of the Report describes, as in former years, the occurrences of stone-falls which have taken place, and the results of researches on aérolites and meteoric irons which have been pub- lished during the past year; and it will be seen from its perusal that the study of the nature of the substances, and of the circumstances of the falls of aérolites, is being pursued with the same activity and success as has characterised during the past year the observation of shooting-stars and fireballs. It now begins to appear extremely probable, especially from the results of Mr. Denning’s recent observations and reductions, that the highest attainable accuracy in mapping the observed directions of the apparent paths of shooting-stars is the real key to the solution of the problem pre- sented by their nightly flights. Numbers of co-existing radiant-points, which would have escaped detection by less careful observations, are thus shown to be capable of recognition, and of being disentangled from each other with precision. The question of the possible connection of large fireballs, and among them of aérolites, or large stony masses, with such showers, and accordingly, it may be, in certain cases with comets, depends also for its solution upon accurate observations of these meteors. In all | the aspects which they present in appearance or position, whether on a large scale of grandeur, or as the smallest scintillations, these singular bodies are certainly attractive objects for accurate investigation and de- scription from the profound obscurity in which at present the whole of the history of their origin appears to be involved. The Committee has thought it desirable, from these considerations, to offer some suggestions to observers, taking the form of general directions for recording exactly any particulars of the occurrences of shooting-stars, fireballs, and aérolites, of which circumstances may enable them to furnish perfectly definite and reliable accounts. The different heads and paragraphs of these directions are added in a convenient series of sections at the end of the Report. REPORT—1 878. 262 ‘ “JUSIT OTT poysey Aoozxodurt worjtsog “JOA qJoT ‘sa0r} oulos ONIYUOG GNVIONH NI GACUONOTU SUVIS-YNILOOHS AO SNOILVAY *“poom “Sulu *olG “YVed “pooM [#9 + 2¢ “Tad ‘A 'M—PLesteg ! OSI “Ued|‘ tpavdojouey wT] “suluUued “WM “S O¢ IOF ywarys v YJoT f duru [1g + 1F "SUOUT “plttttetteeeeetttesees “Buluusg “Wf ‘M— “pout -orpuy 4 juvipey ‘01 ‘yyeg|t stoudT » ivan] *svowy ‘(—Urety Suoy v IFO] “Surluuad “Wf *AA— ples “Tag Yas V FJoT ‘983 “U}ed|-PY ‘Iap1oy *H— *yVaIjs JAOYS B AFT £ paprooar ‘stot “BIN BSI) 9 107 WOT, poor Cog eung “92ST ‘FOF “d “trxx foMUVyosy YSIpduny ,) qjouueq Yue — ‘urety ou puryaq possed ‘{stjoog 3 Sutarasqo OTA “Sty syt Aq paorjou qsarg| tte SyIvuloy puv ‘taaAresqQ [29 + 96 [eg + 9g qnoqe yueip peydopy ] yurod ° ° Q oD [yutog juerp -ey payoalorg | ‘stole 69 + EfT OL + GBI (a}Bmd9¥ UOT}ISOg) TL + GPL Th + 22)" 008 popes (66 + 122) ‘stq00g X avou (9 — 1¢8) TIMyeg 0} Isvseg 4 ee at GE & BL [IL — £83 94 LT + 008 jnoqy | *SUTIE}}LS “Bg 0} VpNoadInNA Woy I-66E GG + 9FE of L ‘Uyed ‘(j) stuoaT g pu A usvaMyaq ‘oa'y uy ‘tole, OaTy puv IOUT], oarTy W99M}Eq “MA 0} "N WoOIF SuTAOU “AA OY} UT ° fe} ° fe} td Qe wort ‘“iwg juereddy ‘H (M—'Plestog { yeorys gee) (|e eae earl NG | 5 0} STUOOvIG, 4)\"** “09S OLS uso) ‘09S F-0 pidey ‘H 'M—'SUCT (0G YVIT}s v YJoT|! losteg g IvaN ]|0} sttouT Bsig 5 a0 A\*** “das g.T “ pidey "S098 $.0 ‘pidey "098 0-1 "** O98 1.0 tee das AgTAS IoyywI WOT}OT *s00g ‘WOLPRING tseeseereeeeggy Pere eeeeereeese tieeeeeeeeen ggg sereeenes $ useis aed Ed weer ereeesrseee Htessesseeen re serene OTT aE seereesee seeeeeeee Noy “s+ MOTOR eis K eeeene weer soeserees 514 *SUI[ZzZep antq |pue IystTIq NFNVEG Wy) Wg ‘TLeUIS syjour[d IO si} tad sv ‘azig juoreddy IMo[og ‘Taeysuruniig|w'd oF OT tereeeerees pag urd GF OT sees TOISTIG ‘urd 9% O1 ‘ueysurutatg | urd 6% OL *plOJXO *£1OPBAIAS -qO epTopry| wd oF TI seer ronstag wd EF TI *ploFxO ‘£IOPVAIOSYO ‘ayrppey jfurdee OL weer eroee [OWA ‘ud #¢ OL *xossq] paLojsupeyD qeau ‘opt wd FF OT “urd OF OT “mOpuo'yT qnoqy um uol }VAIOS CL NS 9 “40 $0 9¥Id) dy) anoy ‘22-9281 SUVHA AHL L L‘suy “LL8T Or OT oung “9L8T aye asdo A1gnod dO LSIT V 263 METEORS. LUMINOUS OBSERVATIONS OF ‘sSuruued “WW M—Plested “uosuyor ‘f "8 ‘Suyuued “\t “M—'TT + 801 JUBIPRI ! YVII4s V IFAT § 006 WIR ‘svon’y] ‘f ‘svon'y ‘f—'ure.} SUOT B 4JOT “suruuag “Wf *A\—"Turue) ut JUBIPBI SYVIIIS VII § o§ ‘WIV ‘sBou'y *¢° ‘Suruus(T ‘A MIL PISEMY fol “Wed ‘svony ‘f' “suluUed “7A —8I + 1g Juerper + o€1 Wed “SuluUdGg “if "“M—eers &@ FET £006 “WIVd “poom "HA M— Plesieg ! yeeI4s & 4JoT “Buluueq “7 “M—YBIYS @ IST 'oSl ‘We ‘POOM “H “M—'Tes -Iog & yuRIpel years & Ajo] “MIZIO "A ‘([—'plesieg ‘soes ¢ IOF YVIIYs uy & Ie * OL We *POOM “H “M—‘Pres [-quesr0A -Ip you syyed £ ureqz00ug | [48 + 901 10'8 + GZI :8 + StI £*Q a10UL Io ‘UOZIIOY, ‘nN Aq “a IBONT] [@) 92 + 16 ‘TnFIQnop A1aA aoueps000y | [@ vormy jo pray sdey -ted) £08 + 2% qnoqe 4B ‘snpuvieg, uy] ['yuas10A -Ip-uou syyed furej100ug | [syed JUd.SIOATP-uOU urezr00ug | [‘pasodizedns Ayivau syyed furezzre0ug | [eo + 12 ! Bpour &Z _— Z1g OL aa IZE ee eeeeeeeseees|seeseesesteses tienby 2 qsed fisesog J MOTAq of SOS ASS). (gy/r| reese eagacc aac [:Ajuo yyed =} ‘99s ¢.9 jo yaed puea ut souep *prdvr -I000V] 1 + 9F F + 99/Mt9A JON] TTT ‘1290 gf pus & MaaMjod 0} TUBpPIIG Q sreeeeees na 0} TINY, A acme J OSKC (| carsenn sah arn |ssaeempes eee oe ‘09S Z-0 6 + hp GI + Z8 ‘pidvy see eeereseerees uunvy, (gf) Fo, aS~my a} *MoTS |eetesetttseee IoyyeI OZ +16 TE + 68} *'0eS G.O)'"** OFT AA tutoo1dep 90} tienby 3 coe prdey aissie Uwendecaes 098 ¢.0 L — 1¢c¢ G + z ‘pidey eee eesereeeees OL + SFR GE + BaRIT ‘OOS g.gl rrr TuLooTAdey g 0} 11enby 2|*** 8h +96 99 + LL" Coe Glas Ga sto tee 6 + 996 9 + 896\"" ‘09S Q-T|"*' MOTTA ‘DOS Egret "09S G.Q|"""'** WIAD ‘gas gol -Iog & yuerper {yeas eB 4JorT]-oIpuy q Iwan ]|"*‘stuooVIG V0} 08 + FL|"** “098 G'Ol"** pay "YIPIO “A “L—pisesed ‘ off Weg *pOOM *H.“M “SIIvpOg WOIJ pax2IIp ¢ og IV [99 + #82 £ sTu0o GL+ 816 &L + 0&6 “99g GZ seeeeetee (4 seeeteees (4 Hieeeeeereeeggy pug seeeeeeeenee gay Hreeeeeeeen te trees ye sreeeeres DIG pig prg eeeeesees pus seeeeeeeeee gy ee bk tl BOC ICOCE A steeeeeereee aT PUG pug “8 Toast *(aoaaq) WO}IPII osu seeeeeseeeee pray “pIOFXO ‘£IOPBAIOS “40 9B pey “Tost *pIOJXO ‘{10VVAIOS “40 2FTPpey see Jost *PloFxXO ‘£10JBAIOS “40 29FTP peu seteeeeeeeee IGT ve roystag ‘ULV SULULITG joIstag WEY SUIULIg YIOK “WHRY.SULULIT seereeees “MIOK “urd g¢ 6 ‘urd 9¢ 6 ‘ud oF TI ‘ud $F TI ‘wdg 11 ‘urd 9¢ OT urd ¢¢ TT ‘wd Z§ IT ‘urd gF IT ‘ud ZF IT ‘ue JT BI “Ul? OT ZT ‘ud Tg TT ‘ud Og TI O€ FF IT ‘urd $F IT ‘urd ¢ TI “vid, @ Awex{]] (Suyuureg) 089 + oLGI** “Oas Gols anf ssa prqrl wd g TT oT OL “suy “S181 6 6 ‘AON 66 66 is] 6°PO 9T 9T II II OT Or Or OL OT or 264 REPORT— 1878. APPENDIX. I. METEORS DOUBLY OBSERVED. Among the lists of occasional observations of shooting-stars received by the Committee during the past year, a few examples occur of simultaneous observations by observers at distant stations of meteors which agree together in every particular of their description, and which, on account of the regularity of the watches kept, the few meteors noted on the same dates, and the good accordance also of the apparent paths when allowance is made for the observers’ positions as regards length and direction of the base-line between their stations, were undoubtedly independent views of the same meteoric bodies, and will, therefore, afford approximate data of the distances and positions, and of the lengths and directions of their real paths. One additional observation of each of two meteors re- corded in last year’s Fireball List has been received, and the descriptions of those meteors, at 10" 44™ p.m., June 10th, 1876, and 108 25™ p.m., August 10th, 1877, already given, are here repeated for comparison with the new descriptions of them which have since been received. The radiant-points concluded from the recorded paths by their direct projections are added in the last column but one of the list. But to these positions, when the tracks nearly overlie each other, and therefore give results very largely and doubtfully affected by the errors of observa- tion, too much importance must not be attached in respect of the varia- tions which they sometimes show from the independent estimates of their probable radiant-points which were originally attached to them by the observers. Radiant positions thus found are yet data of the first and greatest interest to be extracted from such observations. A complete discussion of the heights, velocities, and other particulars of these meteors’ real paths, and of those of a similar list of doubly observed shooting-stars presented in last year’s Report, is postponed at present, until materials for a more general communication on the results of such comparisons present themselves in the course of future observations. II. Large Mereors. Many of the descriptions of fireballs seen during the past year have furnished reliable materials for determining their real courses and the probable astronomical relationships of their orbits. A condensed account of these occurrences is given in this Appendix, as most of the following notes were collected from very scattered sources, and are not the results of preparation and of systematic watches, like those of the foregoing Appendix. The two lists which are included in this Appendix contain the final determinations of the real paths of the most brilliant and widely observed of the past year’s bolides and detonating meteors, and such accounts of others, not so widely observed, as private and published descriptions of them have enabled the Committee to collect. On June 14th, 1877, 85 52" p.m., Paris Time. The large fireball of this date seen in the south of France by M. Gruey at Clermont Ferrand (Puy-de-Dome) was also observed at Bordeaux and at Angouléme with accurate positions by the stars. The agreement of the recorded paths with OBSERVATIONS OF LUMINOUS METEORS. 265 each other and with a radiant point near ¢ Bodtis is very close, and this star was culminating at the time on the south meridian. The initial points of all the tracks begin so near it, probably by an extension to which there is a natural tendency in observations, that the initial height of the fireball thence obtained is without doubt much overrated, while its dura- tion in seconds was very well determined by the independent estimations. There appears no reason (from the greatly overrated length of path) to accept M. Gruey’s calculation that the real orbit of this fireball was a hyperbola of very great eccentricity, as the measure of its real length of path and velocity is based upon very questionable data? A loud detona- tion followed the meteor’s disappearance at Bordeaux, 55 miles from its end point, in five minutes; the distance which sound would travel in that time is about 62 miles. On October 19th, 1877, 6" 13" p.m., Ireland, and the West of England. as streak. 9 55 218 + 75 | 218 + 45 y 7 » bright streak, 11 30 29 + 41 23 + 32 2 A iy streak, 11 35 39 + 44 | 34 + 27 11 40 25 + 63 | 351 + 62 11 45 0+ 60 | 339 + 53 11 55 37 + 60}| 33 +613) 9 [Nearly stationary; 1° long; half as broad; many seconds; very red. 12 0 49} + 58 |Stationary| 2% {Almost stationary; very slight motion; less than 4°, away from Cassiopeia. Aug. 11. 8 53 45 + 77 | 235 + 81 1 |Very swift. 8 55 80 + 57 | 87 + 564 1 |Slow; red; streak. 9 0 0 + 72 | 330 + 72 Rather slow. 9 40 70 + 59 79 + 59 10 5 58 + 58 65 + 573) ° Slow. Mean Alt. of the Perseus Radiant. 1a a Nee Ee 5 Aug. 9, 8 50 to 9 50, counted 5 Perseids and 4 others .........0+- 24 Aug. 10, 9 30 to 10 35, * 2C Perseids and 15 others.........++ 28 > 10 55to12 0, * 22 Perseids and 9 others............. 37 Aug. 11, 8 55 to 10 38, 3 26 Perseids and 22 others ........... 26 I find the radiant point to be distinctly double. 12 of the above tracks indicate with great precision the position 46° + 57°°6, and 8 give 38° + 56°0 with equal accuracy. Although hardly 4° apart, I have no doubt these two centres of radiation are distinct. 1878, March 25th, 10" 22™ 308a.m. Forfarshire and the east coast of Scotland. The fireball, described as brilliant in daytime, and in bright sunshine, in Scotland and in the northern counties of England on this date, pursued its visible course over the North Sea from a height of 50 miles over a point 30 miles E.S.H. from Berwick to a height of scarcely more than 20 miles over the sea 45 miles E.N.E. from Aberdeen. This path is 130 miles long, descending with a slope of about 13°, from 5° or 6° 'W. of South, towards 5° or 6° KH. of North, referred to the horizon of places near Dundee and Aberdeen. Of the duration of the meteor’s flight in this course but few accounts were preserved; but at a height of 35 miles when it was off Arbroath (“a little north of east” from Callander), OBSERVATIONS OF LUMINOUS METEORS. 275 110 miles north from Newcastle-on-Tyne, and 75 miles in a direct line from Dunbar, a first outburst of sparks and scintillations (seen at Cal- lander) seems to have taken place, agreeing nearly in its altitude (16°) with the apparent altitude of 12° or 15° at which it first attracted observers’ attention by its unwonted size and luminosity, at Newcastle. It is in the last 60 miles of its path from this point that durations of its flight varying from one-and-a-half to two seconds were noted at Newcastle and at Callander; while an observer, apparently of its whole path, near Stranraer, gives four seconds for its duration. Hither of these estimates gives nearly 35 miles per second as its real speed of flight. The radiant point was at 332°—20° (R.A. and Decl.), and the speed of a meteor from this radiant point with a parabolic orbit is 33 miles per second; a velocity which the observations therefore substantiate very nearly. Measurements of the meteor’s course at two places near Callander, and at two places ~near Newcastle-on-Tyne, as pointed out by observers there, were obtained by Professor Herschel, and corroborated each other at those places within a few degrees. In answer to a request for similar measurements addressed to observers of the fireball in the ‘Scotsman’ of May lst, by Professor Herschel, a very exact description of its apparent path by carefully observed positions of the line of light, or cloud-streak left upon its track, at Coupar Angus, 15 miles N.W. from Dundee, was sent to the Committee by the head railway porter of that station, Mr. John Robertson. And good accounts of its course at Wigton and Hawick, in the south-west part of Scotland, and at Darlington, as a more distant point of observation in England, were also recorded, of which the collected statements carefully compared together, combine to fix with considerable certainty, and with a degree of accuracy which only admits of very small corrections, the height and situation, and the real direction and velocity, of the meteor’s course, as above described. A peal of distant thunder, heard at about the time of the meteor’s appearance at Dunbar, is perhaps attributable to it, though the distance of the nearest point of the meteor’s track was there 70 miles, which sound traverses in five minutes and a half ; and throughout its course it was indeed between 50 and 70 miles distant from all the easternmost points of the coast, and from the principal towns of the east part of Scotland, where it was very widely noted and observed. The real direction of this fireball’s motion round the sun and arrival upon the earth is remarkable, as but little below the ecliptic (about 9°), very nearly at the place which would belong to the path of a body projected with parabolic velocity directly from the sun itself. In its real orbit it approached the earth from a point of the heavens within 10° of the sun’s place (about 3° behind it in longitude, and 9° south of it in latitude), which was in the ecliptic at longitude 44°. The following table gives the elements of its orbit, supposing it to have been parabolic: and the conclusion arrived at from the observations is that the perihelion distance, or the least distance of the meteor in its orbit from the sun’s centre during its closest approach to and passage round the sun, was about =1,th (0022) of the earth’s distance from the sun, or about four of the sun’s radii distant from its surface as it neared it, and made the rapid circuit of its sharply returning orbit round it! & = 184° 30’ eis Motion retrograde. q = 0:022 72 276 REPORT—1878. A LIST OF FIREBALLS SEEN DURING AND Hour Date Approx. Place of Position or G.M.T., or| Observation Apparent Size, Colour fee Apparent Path (Lel. Time) 1871.| h m Sept. 4| 9 30 p.m. |Ross, Hereford-|5 or 6X Q .ccoccesleeceeceeeesorens ..|Moved slowly|Beginning at al shire. about 30° N.E and disappear ing at about ali 10°, due N. 1876. Jan.29| About |St. Mary’s Os-|Bright meteor ...}.....ccseres Saacjoseecssn Sesssedee Passed _ throug 9 p.m. cott [?]. Andromeda. Feb.27} 6 15 a.m. |Melrose, Scot-|Bright fireball ...)....cccccsecseseoelsreeescecescseeees Passed from N, t land. S.W. May 8|8 45 p.m. |Ibid ............ Brilliant MCteOr. | scacecs.scocswonan|caseveccesscsentne Moving toward 5.W. Jun.10| About |London ......... Nucleus rather|Beautiful |Rather swift.|/Between Leo Mi 10 40 p.m. small,butbright} blue colour. nor and Le( and dazzling. Major July15]11 7 p.m. |Clapton, Lon-|Very fine meteor. |...........scssee[ecseesereeeeeeeees Began just beloy don, a Pegasi, and disappeared ai or near w Pis cium. ‘Aug. 7] 9 37 p.m. |St. Germain en/Large fireball .../First white,/About 2 Began in the Con Laye, France. then bril-| seconds. stellation Lyra liant green. and passed im mediately be low that Aquila. Sep. 23] 7 40 p.m. |Melrose, Scot-|Bright meteor ...)......scsseseevseslecesererecseeeeees Passed from N.W land, to §.K. Noy. 8/5 35 p.m./Rossiniére, Parse fire alk Weslcctecncsssdostent aceesynteenwaveran Point of first ap the same] Vaud, and pearance clos hour, 5"| generally ob- to a Tarand 5™ p.m.) served in (Bode) at 4 (Po) G. M. T.,) Switzerland. é laris, e Cassio] to a mi- peiz); [25° nute, as 76°.] Disap) that of pearing at alt the large 20° or 21°. fireball seen in England. : Dec.13| 4 45 p.m. |Northfield, near|Brighter and White cacrves os Motion quick/In the S8.E., froz Birmingham.| larger than ? (no time to} about alt. 609 appears at night call atten-| to about 30° tion). 1877. Feb.11| 7 40 p.m.|Birmingham ...|Very brilliant — [.......+e...008 .».|Motion very|In the north-west meteor, slow, com-} no part of it | pared to] path having thatofmost} very great ap meteors. parent alt. OBSERVATIONS OF LUMINOUS METEORS. 277 BEFORE THE YEAR ENDING IN AUGUST, 1878. peneth of | Direction or Radiant-point | Appearance, Remarks, &c. eapadihcan » Biiccwscenscsnes [Near 8 Aquarii by the com-|Like a large roman-candle ball.|H. Southall (commu- od bined paths; 345°—15°| [The same meteor’s apparent|/ nicated by G. J. (+4°in R. A., and 48° in| path and appearance at Dur-| Symons.) d Decl. ] ham is recorded with asketch : in these Reports. Vol. for : 1872, p. 74.] ae Epcana Hs tO) Wie. scechiedarstaccsavs|sccsnsersacsvccscesce 58™ a similar one shot upwards to Polaris, as bright as Sirius, and of the same mauve colour as the former one. “The characteristic of these meteors seemed to be their length and the brightness of the streaks mostly left upon their tracks, while the true Germinids were short, and seldom streak-leaving. Their radiant was at 108° + 28°, and this meteor-stream had ceased almost entirely on the following night. “On the next evening (December 10th), between 7 and 11» 30”, sixty-five meteors were seen, forty of which were Geminids. The hour from 10" 30™ to 115 30™ produced twenty-five meteors, almost all from the principal radiant, Only one was equal to a first magnitude star, and itwas pale green, Very few of the Geminids left streaks, and they were mostly very short and small. The radiant was diffuse, perhaps owing to the difficulty of mapping them in the barren part of the sky between Gemini and Polaris where they frequently appeared. Many radiated from near Castor, and others from nearer to @ Geminorum ; the mean position [nearly midway between those stars] being at 107° + 35°. “A few Geminids were seen on the 12th; the 11th being quite over- cast.” Some further account of the shower’s prevalence on the latter date, and on some earlier days in December, are supplied by Mr. Denning’s notes, who wrote from Bristol :—‘ On the night of December 6th, I found meteors wonderfully scarce ; only thirteen in three hours (!); and only two of them were Geminids. Of twenty-three meteors seen in two hours and a half on the evening: of the 8th and morning of the 9th, four were Gemi- nids. Onthe morning of the 11th, between 5 10™ and 6" 10™ a.m. (1) eleven meteors were seen, including two Geminids. On the morning of the 13th (between storms and clouds), I looked out for about three-quar- ters of an hour between 4" 45™ and 52 45™ a.m. Meteors were falling very fast, and I saw twenty-eight altogether, of which six were Gemi- -nids.* In one anda quarter hour, between 54 15™ and 65 30™ a.m. on the morning of December 14th, twenty-one meteors were seen, but no Gemi- * Among these meteors a few fine shooting stars with streaks and very swift long paths, diverged from a point on the equator in R.A. 166°. This agrees with 4 position (T. 2) given by Captain Tupman, although for a rather later date, at 160° + 3°, Dec. 23-31st and 165°+ 4°, Jan. 8-10th. 332 REPORT—1878 nids. The watch on all these mornings was directed towards the eastern sky, not so much to observe the Geminids as to discover some new showers in Virgo, Corona, Bootes, &c., which are just visible before daylight in December ; and of four of these which I observed I believe the following positions to be accurate, at 199° +19°, 221° + 48°, 230° + 38°, and 195° — 3° (December 11-14th, a.m., 1877). “The radiant point of the Geminids was at 107° + 33°, with suspected neighbouring centres at 102° + 45°, 87° + 37°, and 111° + 23°. The me- teors were slow near the radiant, but rapid when far from it. Their courses are not often marked with streaks, and are almost invariably short; in this and other particulars of the general appearance of the Ge- minids, I can clearly confirm Mr. Greg’s remarks from my own observa- tions of them both this year and last.” Star-showers of January and April, 1878.—Watches kept at several places in England for the meteors of January Ist-3rd were almost whoily unsuccessful, a cloudy and overcast state of the sky having prevailed everywhere on the dates of their expected appearance. Occa- sional glimpses of clear sky occurred in Kent, however, on the first three nights of the year, and the January shower was seen, at Hawk- hurst, with some intensity on the morning of January 2nd, by Profes- sor Herschel. Seventeen Quadrantids and three unconformable meteors were registered during the half hour beginning at four o'clock, a.m., at the end of which clouds formed and overspread the sky. The meteors were bright, two being equal to Jupiter or Sirius, and five or six equal to each of the first and second magnitudes of the fixed stars; the rest being as bright as third or fourth magnitude stars ; occasional thin clouds, and a slight haze which dimmed the stars, perhaps concealed some meteors of the smallest magnitudes, and caused the radiant obtained from their recorded tracks to be a little diffuse. Its centre occupied a point at about 222° + 55° in quadrans, near 6 Bodtis. This point being nearly in the zenith, the meteors’ courses were short and quick, and that of the brightest one appeared to be a little curved. They were yellowish-white in colour. and left no streaks or sparks. During a watch of half an hour on each of the mornings of January 1st and 3rd, when the sky was clear, no me- teors of the Quadrantid shower were seen, the maximum of its display being accordingly confined to the morning of the 2nd. The nights of April 19th—21st, 1878, were also very unfavourable for observations, but a slight return of the “ Lyrids ” was observed at Bristol on the nights of April 20th—-22nd, by Mr. Denning. Three Lyrids and three meteors from a radiant near « Herculis were seen in two hours, amid much cloud, on the 20th; and in the same time, with very clear sky, twenty-five meteors (six Lyrids) and twenty-two meteors (three Lyrids) were seen towards midnight on the 21st and 22nd, An abundance of me- teors, and a continuance of the Lyrid shower on these latter nights is rare ; and it seems to have been an exceptional feature of the shower in the present year. The meteors left streaks, and the paths recorded were nearly all foreshortened near the radiant-point, which was very exactly defined at 272° + 32°. This position, near 6 and the star 99 (A, Bode) Herculis, is in 5° less right ascension than the Lyrid-centre (QH,, 1874) found by Greg and Herschel, and agrees more exactly with the radiant of the Lyrid-comet 1861 I (at 271° + 33°), and with the position found in April, 1869, by Professor Schiaparelli from Dr. Karlinski’s observations (at 267° + 35°), than other previous determinations ; a feature also of the April OBSERVATIONS OF LUMINOUS METEORS. 333 Lyrids of the present year in which their feebly pronounced display seems to have been somewhat peculiar.* The next remarkable meteor-shower observations of the present year were those of the July and August shooting-stars, 1878. A distinct shower of Cassiopeiads of those months, coinciding with one already re- corded by Greg, Heis, and Schiaparelli, at about 12° + 70°, was observed in July by Mr. Denning at 15° + 70° (thirty-five meteors). Towards the end of July, having, from foreign catalogues and other sources, obtained abundant indications of circum-Perseus and other contemporary showers of the great August epoch, Mr. Denning employed the finest nights after the moon’s last quarter to verify them by his own observations. A meteor was thus observed on July 21st, of a shower near 0 Persei (at 32° + 53°), of which Mr. Denning had anticipated the date and posi- tion from the following indications :— July 6-17 (1877) ... 36°+ 47°, 6 Js; observed by W. F. | Denning Ae. RR EOllllissieecsnseees 32°+ 51°, 25 {s; in various foreign Average position Catalogues ...... July 6-Aug. 13, SDAP. 2 vasasass 30°+ 47°, 10 |s; inthe Italian Cata- 33° + 49°. logue, 1872...... r (= Schmidt, and Aug. 6-12...... 34°+ 50°, 3 )s; in the Italian Cata- Aug. 3-12, logue, 1872...... 31°+ 55°.) -* WIR ERA eee 33°+ 51°, 10 Js; in various foreign Catalogues ...... J A strong maximum of this shower, quite confirming the correctness of Mr. Denning’s anticipations of its reappearance, set in on the nights of July 26th—August Ist, exhibiting a perfectly defined radiant-point 3° or 4° south of the star-cluster x Persei, at 33° + 52°. Forty-four meteors from this radiant-point were traced on the nights of July 30th, 31st, and An- gust Ist, alone ; and the whole number of meteor tracks recorded from it until August 1st was fifty-nine. The maximum took place on the night of July 31st, when twenty-one of its meteors were observed. They are short, swift, white shooting-stars, leaving streaks, and by their resemblance to the true Perseids, or Perseids I, fromwhose principal centre their radiant is only distant about six or seven degrees, these mock-Perseids, or Perseids II, have no doubt been mistaken, when abundant in July, for the earliest meteor-representatives of the true Perseid display. The shower was of brief duration, and as short-lived in its departure as in approach- ing its maximum, for among forty-four meteors seen on the nights of Au- gust 7th and 8th, when the sky was again clear enough for observation, - not a single meteor of this new Perseid system was observed. Of the true Perseids the first indications seen were five or six meteors, on the nights of July 31st and August 1st ; and six meteors among sixteen, regis- tered on August 7th, were Perseids I. * «The April Lyrids and Contemporary Meteor-Showers,’ by W. F. Denning: “Monthly Notices’ of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. xxxviii. p. 396, May, 1878. A number of cireum-Lyra showers for the great April-epoch, deduced from foreign observers’ catalogues, together with some active shower-centres in April, observed by himself, are presented in this Paper by Mr. Denning. Among the latter is one suspected near 6 Cassiopeiz, which is perhaps identical with the centre of divergence of two detonating fireballs seen in Austria on April 10th, 1874, and April 9th, 1876, which Professor von Niessl found to be near ¢ Cassiopeiz. (See the last volume of these Reports, p. 147.) 334 REPORT—1878. Another rich and important meteor-shower of bright shooting-stars with long slow courses, with a radiant point near 6 Aquarii at 341°—13°, was seen by Mr. Denning on the night of July 27th, and many more were recorded from it on the two next nights, while on the last clear night of observations, on August Ist, its brief but notable and very active display had entirely disappeared. With the shower of Perseids II, this fine and conspicuous star-shower of ¢ Aquariads (already recorded, T. 43, on the same date and with the same radiant position, by Captain Tupman, in the year 1870,* and seen in August, 1877, at the same place by Mr. Denning), deserves to be ranked with the Orionids, Geminids, May Aquariads, and a few other distinct, but not yet much studied, meteor systems, among the major, or special star-showers of the year ; and to have its date and radiant- point more frequently examined to discover if its appearance is annual, or subject to regular or irregular fluctuations. The Perseid shower of August 10th, 1878.—The brightness of the moon until after midnight, followed immediately by that of approaching day- break, detracted from the apparent abundance of the shower. The sky was quite overcast on the nights of August 9th and 11th; but cloudless on the 10th. At Bristol Mr. Denning counted about 130 meteors in a watch of four hours anda half, between 10> 30™ p.m. and 3” a.m. ; thirty- three meteors being counted in the last half-hour, of which twenty-six were Perseids. This rate of appearance was less than the half-hourly number (forty-two or thirty-three Perseids and nine unconformable meteors), be- tween 12" 30™ and 25 30™, a.m., on the night of August 10th-11th, 1877, although fog, haze, and clouds then slightly dimmed the stars. The shower’s appearance this year was accordingly less active than at the corresponding time in August, 1877. The paths of seven Perseids, as bright as the planets Mars and Jupiter, and of five equal to first magnitude stars, were mapped, and several other bright Perseids were seen, all of which left persistent streaks. Attention was especially given by Mr. Denning to mapping the tracks of Perseids near the radiant point, and of these the foreshortened, paths traced backwards were found to diverge from two centres. Radiant Tat 44° + 59°, 21° preceding B Camelopardi; » ILat 42:5°+ 54°, nearly midway between y and 7 Persei. The former point agrees with Mr. Denning’s observationsf at 44° + 58°°5, 43° + 59°, and 43° + 58°) of the position of the Perseid radiant-point in August 1874-6-7 ; and it is in close proximity (3° N. of & Perseiat 54° + 56°) with the radiant-point of the Perseid shower in August, 1863, recog- * The same shower has also been variously recorded, between the dates of July 20th and August 13th, by Heis and Neumayer, Schmidt, and Weiss (six positions), and is G. 109 in Mr. Greg’s General List of Meteor Showers, 1875-6. The shower of meteors with long courses, diverging from a radiant near Fomathaut, seen by Professor A. 8. Herschel on the 28th of July, 1865 (see these Reports, vol. for 1865, pp. 104, 123), appears, on reprojecting their recorded paths, to have been, without doubt, one of the regular appearances of this shower, four of whose meteor | paths, traced backwards, intersecting each other accidentally with exactness near that southern star, gave a false impression of the radiant’s position (at 338°— 28°), 15° south of the true one in declination. t See these Reports, vols. for 1876, page 151, and 1877, p. 158 (foot-notes), and vol. for 1877, p. 173. The same places are also given (Nos. 18, 16, and 65) in Mr. Denning’s three shower-lists, in the ‘ Monthly Notices ’ of the Royal Astronomical Society (vol, xxxvi., p, 284; xxxvii., p. 108; and xxxviii,, p, 305) of 1871-75, 1876, and 1877, ~ OBSERVATIONS OF LUMINOUS METEORS. 335 nised by Schiaparelli as agreeing almost exactly with the radiant-point of the Perseid comet, 1862 III, at about 438° + 57°°5. The second radiant- oint agrees with Heis’ position, A, of the centre of the Perseids at 45° + 52°, and also with the radiant-point of a more recent comet, 1870 I, on August 12th, at 43°°5 + 53°. It may perhaps be that these two comets represent two meteor streams which are in simultaneous activity im the Perseus shower, and in his remarks on this accordance (here quoted from his description of the Perseids of the present year in ‘The Observatory,’ vol. i. p. 165) Mr. Denning notices an equally remarkable coincidence, which he regards as offering even more conclusive evidence of the latter comet’s connection with the Perseus shower, that the rich and long-enduring shower of the Perseids, seen with prolonged inten- sity on the nights of the 10th—11th* (and with many fine meteors on the 12th and 13th) of August, 1871, happened a year after that comet’s appear- ance, in the same manner that the extraordinary Perseid shower of Au- eust 10th, 1863, occurred in the year following that in which the comet 1862 III made its appearance. The two instances of near concurrence between a comet and a meteor-shower resemble each other very closely, and there appears, indeed, to be no reasonable possibility of rejecting the conclusion that the conspicuous return of the August Perseids in the year 1871 was not a simple maximum of their ordinary stream, but the result of a passing contribution to its swarm of shooting-stars by the passage very near the earth’s path of a second meteor-comet, attended by a second zone or multitude of Perseids of August 10th-12th, moving in a slightly different companion orbit from that of the first or annually-recurring shower, and of the meteor-comet corresponding to the Perseids of August 10th. A strict examination of the August radiant-point, hereafter, will be most desirable to decide the question if, like the major stream of Perseids between & Persei and B Camelopardi (at 44° + 58°), the fellow-stream at y Persei (43° + 53°) is an annually recurring one, and forms, like the ordinary Perseids of August 10th, a closed belt or ring of meteors circu- lating in a continuous stream, or travels in a single, or in detached clusters, round the sun. Mr. Corder’s view of the Perseids, at Writtle (‘The Observatory,’ vol. ii. p. 160), was, in point of numbers and in the position of the radiant- point, very similar to Mr, Denning’s. In four hours, between 11 30™ and 36 30", 115 meteors (of which ninety-seven were Perseids) were seen. The mean horary number (twenty-eight of all meteors, and twenty-four of Perseids) was much exceeded during the hour between 24 15™ and 3 15™ a.m., when forty-four meteors were observed. Of the ninety-seven Perseids seen, sixty left streaks, and twenty were coloured. One which appeared at 25 28™ a.m. must have been much brighter than Venus, in its flash at bursting, as it cast a sensible glare upon a lamplit page. Its streak remained visible in the sky, from 352° + 48° to 341° + 40°, long * In the map of the meteor-tracks of this shower, seen near the radiant-point on August 10th and 11th, which is figured at p. 91 of the volume for 1872 of these Reports, 36 of the 135 meteor-paths there drawn (or 27 per cent.) diverge, as Mr. _ Denning has found, pretty exactly from a radiant-point at 42°+ 54°. The remainder of the tracks proceed principally from a radiant region in rather higher declination, belonging perhaps properly to the true Perseid comet, while the former point denotes the fellow-comet, 1870 I. Of the meteor-paths on the nights of August 12th and 13th few were recorded, but of such tracks of them as were noted it would certainly be a very important utilisation to endeavour to define the exact radiant-point in Perseus which they exhibit by a similar projection. 336 REPORT—1878. enough to record its track exactly. The recorded paths of forty or fifty Perseids laid down in a map gave the radiant-point of the shower most accordantly at 43° + 56°. Another means of ascertaining it was alse adopted by prolonging the short tracks of several meteors seenland mapped near the radiant-point at about 12 a.m. backwards, with the resulting position, 45° + 57°; and a perfectly stationary meteor was seen at 47° + 58°. The precision of the meteors’ radiation from the general radiant- point was surprising, much more so than on August 10th, 1877, when the radiant region was diffuse with a general centre at 47° + 62°. The appa- rent shifting of the radiant-point, then observed, to a more accurate one at 58° + 56° on August 11th, could not be verified in the present year, as on that date the sky was quite overcast. Both at Writtle and at Bristol many meteors were seen on the nights of August 7th and 8th, including several Perseids and some Cassiopeiads. From the Perseids seen on the 7th Mr. Denning found a position of the radiant-point at 42° + 57°, and Mr. Corder one at 43° + 55°. Although not remarkably intense, the radiation of the August Perseids, in the year 1878, yet seems from all these descriptions to have been unusually exact. Catalogues of meteor-showers, and Directions to Observers of Luminous Meteors.—The example first set by Heis of observing the general centres of radiation of shooting-stars on ordinary nights of the year has borne abundant fruit during a long period of more than thirty years; but at the same time never more rapidly, perhaps, than during the last two or three. Towards the end of last year was published, as the conclusion of his own labours in this field of observation and reduction, a full and perfect compilation, recently projected and finally completed by the late Professor Heis, of the results of his original or otherwise recorded observations, and of the calculations and determinations founded upon them, accom- panied by comparisons with the work of other professional observers with whom he continued to be in constant communication on this and other subjects of his long-continued investigations until the last days of his life. The work was issued, a few months after his decease, to the astronomical public, as one of the ordinary publications * of the Royal Observatory of Minster, under the joint editorship of his daughters and the supervision of one of the great astronomer’s thoroughly accomplished pupils. Of this work the Committee received, in pursuance of a previous arrangement with Professor Heis, a communication of fifty copies from the Miinster University librarians, by the directions of the late Professor Heis’ daughters; and with the assistance of their recommendations the greater part of these copies were distributed, towards the close of last year, to a number of British and foreign observers and leading observa- tories, selected as having been his most active co-operators in the observa- tion of meteors, and in the collection and discussion of phenomena relating to the astronomical theory of shooting-stars. The work comprises, in 180 quarto pages, here and there illustrated with woodcuts, the apparent paths and brief descriptions of about 13,000 shooting-stars observed under Professor Heis’ own directions at Aix-la- Chapelle and Miinster, and of about 3000 meteors seen elsewhere in Ger- many, and in other countries. Of this latter number the author’s wide cor- * Vol. ii., 1877 :---(as was noticed in the last volume of these Reports, for 1877, p- 101.) ¥ , a 45° s PENS Kg a Ne v3 a ae Oe Co OBSERVATIONS OF LUMINOUS METEORS. 337 respondence enabled him to receive and to publish many accounts in the well-known astronomical journal begun and conducted by himself for a long course of years, the ‘Wochenschrift fiir Astronomie,’ and fre- quent references to this weekly journal occur in the meteor catalogue of the work. The narrative portion, forming the remainder of the volume, contains the results of calculations and reductions from the catalogue, lists of stationary meteors, of meteors with serpentine paths, and of dates of unusual frequency and scarcity of shooting-stars. The introduction of this part also discusses and explains the practical mode of observing and the methods of calculation used, by which, with very little change since their first adoption in the year 1833, the whole of the important results of the author’s forty-three years’ observations of meteors presented in the volume were obtained. Among the many meteors simultaneously recorded at two or more stations, the heights at first appearance of 246, and at disappearance of 273, are calculated; and the following table, translated into British statute miles from the corresponding table of the work, exhibits the numbers of these heights respectively which fall in the successive nine-mile intervals (nearly) of height above the earth’s surface extending to Height above the earth 18 27 37 46 55 G4 74 83 92 101 110 119 129 138 147 156 (niles). Number of initial QoS 12 TSE 2 8b 8 HAS DE TOO TG, 907) Re Geen eee heights. ices 3 1) 44.56 64, 31 23) 16 ke ks eg The most frequent height of commencement is between sixty-five and seventy miles, and the most frequent height of disappearance of the meteors appears by this table to be about forty-five miles above the earth’s surface. A useful table might be constructed from the nights of the year on which shooting-stars were noted as unusually abundant, to guide ob- servers in watching for their extraordinary displays, but the extent and fulness of this record in the original work forbids a partial summary to be presented here of its contents, until they can be more thoroughly examined and arranged to serve conveniently and usefully for such a purpose. At the end of this appendix a careful analysis is given by Mr. Greg of the new and greatly enlarged list of Heis’ radiant-points, ob- tained by the author’s special method of reduction from the meteor-paths described in the catalogue, with which the work concludes. A very large increase of their number above that of the last earlier list (of eighty- four showers; see the volume of these reports for 1873, p. 403) pub- lished by the late Professor Heis, has principally been made in the last half of the year; and the co-ordinates of position of a few of the old showers (which retain their appellations, while numerals and special symbols denote the new ones) have at the same time been changed and rectified by the discussions of the newer observations. The Committee avails itself of this opportunity to present, with the analysis of the new radiant-list of Heis, that published in 1871, in the German trans- lation of his work on shooting-stars, by Professor Schiaparelli, the meteor- showers of which are frequently quoted, and identified with certain meteor- tracks, in Heis’ final reductions, Of this list (with the exception of an 1878. 4 ">. ¥ : oN Sine NT A - ia | a ee ey 'c-)."_” “NOVAS bee ; oe : Chale. G aon > ae ee 338 | --peporT—1878. ‘ abridgment for the whole year, and of a preliminary list for the first half-year in full, see the volumes of these reports for 1870, p. 98, and 1871, p. 46) no entire abstract for useful reference has hitherto appeared in these reports. A series of instructions to observers for recording me- teors and meteorites, drawn up at the request of the Committee by Dr. W. Flight and Professor Herschel, to furnish both regular and occasional observers of meteors of every kind with suitable directions as to the pro- per means and methods of recording them, and for preserving useful particulars of their various phenomena, is added to these lists with a view of facilitating their consultation and perusal by those who may fortunately be observers of star-showers, or who may be desirous of trac- ing the directions of large meteors from some of the many active radiant- points with which the sky is found to be more or Jess thickly strewn at all the ordinary hours and seasons of the year. Important lists, both of his own observations of such showers through- out the year 1877, and of similar showers for the whole year found by searches and projections of the meteor-tracks in the Italian Meteor Asso- ciation catalogue of shooting-stars for the year 1872, were published during the past year by Mr. Denning.* The first of these is a continuation of his two earlier lists of twenty-seven, and of fifty-two meteor-showers for the four years ending in March, 1876, and for April-December, 1876, published in the ‘Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society,’ yol. xxxvi. pp. 283-285, and vol. xxxvii. pp. 105-115¢ ; and it includes new positions and notes of the appearances of 162 meteor-showers deduced from the paths of 1,929 shooting-stars registered by himself, chiefly in the last half of the year 1877. Descriptions of the majority of the most conspicuous of these showers, showing especially the dates of their maximum abundance, are given in the accompanying list of ‘ Remarkable meteor-showers in the years 1877-78.’ The second list contains the posi- tions of 315 radiant-points deduced by systematic projections of about 4,000 of the 7,500 meteor-paths (omitting about 3,500 tracks observed on August 3rd-14th) recorded by the Italian Meteor Association in the year 1872. This first catalogue of the Italian Association’s observations falls naturally into thirteen periods separated by void intervals owing to the brightness of full moonlight; and grouping two of these into one (February-March, and November—December) in two cases where the showers were little distinguishable from each other, Mr. Denning de- * ‘Monthly Notices’ of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. xxxviii. p. 303 (for the declinations of the last three showers on the page, + 1, 1, 2, read + 15, 19, 22); and Jbid., p. 315 ; March, 1878. } The Table of fifty-two radiant-points observed and engrossed together ina list by Mr. Denning, at p. 176 of the volume of these Reports for 1877, is a partial com- bination of the two above lists extending as far as October, 1876. It was com- municated (in the form in which it is there presented) to the ‘ Astronomische Nachrichten,’ towards the end of the year 1876, as was noted at p. 162 of the last volume of these Reports. But in the above English publications of Mr. Denning’s earlier lists, the first (of April 1876, twenty-seven radiants) extends to March, 1876 ; and the second (of fifty-two radiants, January, 1877), from April to December, 1876. They are referred to in the accompanying ‘ List of Remarkable Star-showers, as D., or D. (71-6), and D. (76), while the combined list of last year’s Report will be desig- nated (if again referred to) DN, or DN (76) ; and that of 162 showers, observed in the year 1877 (published, as above notified, by Mr. Denning in the present year,) is denoted by D (77) ; Mr. Denning’s Table of Reductions of the Italian Catalogue of 1872 (published at the same time) by D8. aioe ~ \ ee OBSERVATIONS OF LUMINOUS METEORS. 339 duced for each of the resulting eleven periods a series of showers or radiant-points, of which the following were the various numbers :— _ , Number of Number of Duration of Group epee pf Shower- Group np Wels meteors I SANUAL YU enaenases Wadeceecaenunddsas dt atersss 30 313 II Webruaty'1—Mareb V2. i..ci....ectdsl ene 24 381 II Marehr3i=Aprill 12g, «sai. ecesnceeds a4). ies 37 542 IV i ERT SP pa a a Sana 22 269 Vv May. 26—JUnG US 0... ke sasacdisasecduich das a= 31 356 VI PUNE ZO DULG HM evacicsnvasicuceteusteuncas ere’ 36 459 Vil Ul yr T5S-AUSUSE: Dives secescuvestessedeacereescns 27 264 VII Aug usti6=1 2s (am) iis te le eR ek 25 413 IX August 24-September 14 ..... se. se seeeee 36 455 x October 29-November 13 .....0....0.0000 24 255 XI November 25-December 31 ............++: 23 436 Totals, January-December ...... | 315 | 4,143 The showers are frequently recurrent in two, or even more successive periods’; and of the whole number nearly 200 are probably distinct meteor-systems, with well determined radiant-points, most of the dates and positions of their centres agreeing well with those of formerly-known showers, occurring in earlier catalogues; but many of them also are new, and a few are apparently rich systems, agreeing in some cases with cometary dates and radiant-points. Of these two shower-catalogues, showing where they corroborate each other and confirm older well-established positions of general radiant- points of shooting-stars, Mr. Greg has prepared a Table (Table V. p. 358) continuing and completing thé analysis (Tables I.—IV., in the last volume of these Reports, pp. 180-187) for the first half of the year, which he made last year of Mr. Denning’s observations, and Italian meteor-shower reductions. The limits of that analysis are now extended, by this additional table, so as to afford a complete comparative list of the newly found radiant-positions traced by Mr. Denning, for all the different months of the year. As a result of his arrangement at O’Gyalla for collecting observations of shooting-stars in Hungary (some MS. lists of which at its commence- ment, see the note in these Reports, vol. for 1877, p. 165, the Committee received formerly), Herr N. von Konkoly presented to the Com- mittee, at the end of last year, two volumes of meteor observations, _ containing observed paths and notes of the appearances of 1191 and 1367 meteors respectively, recorded during the years 1871-73, and _ 1874-76. To assist and promote accurate registration of meteor-tracks, _ and the collection of such accounts among astronomers of his own and _ other countries, Herr von Konkoly has had drawn and lithographed _ (by Carl Schrader, of his observatory at O’Gyalla) two planispheres, or _ central projections of the sphere on two planes touching it, one at the pole, and the other at the equator of the heavens. No stars are entered _ on the plates, which contain the meridians and parallel circles only, for each degree, but a catalogue of them from the north pole to the 30tk _ degree of south declination, and full directions for their insertion on the : “2 H PAMPER Lai ee ; ¢ Res capt Por. Me py, - +e ee Le can het 340 _-REport—1878. he age blank plates, and a long and valuable explanation of the various means y of mapping, and recording and reducing to their radiant-points (and even to their real paths and distances) the tracks of shooting-stars, and of noting the special appearances of fireballs, when any such are seen, | accompanies the plates in a lithographed pamphlet, also drawn up by Carl Schrider. The spherical radius of the maps is 25 cm. or 9°85 in., - a little less than the radius, 12 in., to which the six similarly ruled plates of the Useful Knowledge Society’s Atlas, (drawn by the late Sir John Lubbock) are constructed. But instead of being only 50 cm. square, so as simply to enclose the sphere in a circumscribing cube (like the maps just mentioned), the plates are 59 cm. square, and reach at the sides to 50°, instead of to 45°, and at the corners to 59°, instead of to 55° from the centre of the map. The cubical projection of the O’Gyalla maps extends accordingly upon each face, to about 5° beyond the edges of the cube; and meteor-tracks prolonged to the edge of either of its six maps, admit, therefore, of being easily transcribed in part (and these prolonged with a straight ruler) upon the next adjoining map. This kind of projection of the sphere lends itself, therefore, very conveniently to determining radiant-points of shooting-stars, at whatever hour and day of the year, and in whatever geographical latitude of the globe, a sufficient number of their apparent paths may have been observed. Besides the large Minster catalogue of Professor Heis, and Herr von Konkoly’s Hungarian catalogue of meteor-tracks, two long lists of shooting-stars, by Professor Dorna, of Turin, recorded at the Royal Italian Observatory of that city, in November, 1867, and August, 1869, (presented to the Committee some years ago by the author) have, in addition, furnished Mr. Denning with some new materials, of which he has availed himself, to deduce additional lists of meteor-showers, partly forthe special dates of the major annual star-showers of April, August, and November, and partly in general for the last half of the year. This last list, containing ninety-two radiant-points will, it is hoped, shortly be published. Of the former lists, one at least, that of circum- Lyra radiant-points of April 19th-23rd, was recently described in a brief paper, on ‘the April Lyrids [in 1878] and contemporary Meteor-showers,’ in the ‘Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society,’ by Mr. Denning.* Among many thousands of paths (chiefly found for this date in Dr. Weiss’s Austrian Meteor-catalogue, 1867-74) Mr. Denning selected about 300, as radiating from centres in Cygnus, Draco, Lyra, Vulpecula, etc., and deduced eighteen radiant-positions from them, three or four, at least, of which may be regarded as exact and well determined, although (from want of proximity, doubtless, to their maximum dates) they are yet very inconsiderable showers. Accompanying the principal shower in Lyra are two very slender ones, near 7 and (3 Lyre; but in the adjoining constellations the principal contemporaneous showers are, first, a well-known shower at o Draconis (the Draconids, G. 64, 22)s); secondly, a new, exact and certain shower between 6 and 7» Cygni . (25s), with several other showers in Cygnus, near w, z, v, A, €, and ¢ © Cygni, to which one, pretty well confirmed from other sources, may be added near s Vulpecule. Thirdly, systems near a and (£ Cephei (of fifteen or sixteen meteors each) and a weak shower in the southern part of Lacerta. And lastly, a well-defined shower in Anser (20s) with two * Vol. xxxvili. p. 396; May, 1878. 4 f ‘ rf va. PS 5 iy beh ¥ k Wave « SN ighdld «ie a toa’ ¢ " | ria F } ‘ - 4 * ' 341° iP \ - - Y OBSERVATIONS OF LUMINOUS METLORS. _ weak showers near it, in Sagitta, and one in Taurus Ponies. Both the _ Anser-Sagitta showers and the one near Taurus Poniatovii, seem to have been noticed previously by Mr. Denning, (Nos. 30, 34, 1877 ) on April 16th-19th, 1877, and by Captain Tupman (T. 35, 34) on May 2nd, 1870, and they present some resemblances to the hypothetical shower-radiants of the comets 1853 II, and 1844 II, which passed at the nodal dates, May Ast, and April 21st, slightly within the earth’s orbit at their descending nodes. Some other accordances of the same kind presented by these new April showers are pointed out in the accompanying Table.‘ Comet-Node 1844 IT 3, (8 ee — 0:08) J857 II 3s, (4 distance — 0:07) 1790 III 3, (4 distance — 0:06) [And 1763 ¢, Mar. 18, + 0-02, 312°5 + 21:5] 1784 II 2, Date and Position of Radiant- point, and No of Meteors Va April 21... Ph ee ad peor J |May 2, 1870 ..--. 283 412 oc... April 16 19, 1877 286 + 5 (12 Js) April 19-28 ...... 275 +11( 7 Js)|\DW Ke. Mine We setsencss='s 29G54+135 ...... May 2, TS TOV ee 298 + Be celseess April 16-19, 1877 303 +13 ( 8 Js) 287 +22 (20 Js) April 19-23 ape go te Ci tay 302 +18( 6 Js) ADEM Zt oeteracane tO lO tel Ontencas sana May and June ... 310 +24 ......... April 19-23 ...... 312 +22 (13 {s)|< 1 Description of Radiant- point. Near 5 Aquila. T 34. Near G18 Aquile. D (77), 34. Near 6 Aquile. Taurus Ponia- tovli. Near y Aquile, 8 Sagittee. T 35. Near B Aquile. D (77), 30. Near p- Aquilee. DW &c. Near a (Bode) and 5 Vulpecule. DW ke. Near Bf Sagitte, y Aquile. \DW &c. Near y Sagitte, p Aquile. Near ¢ (Bode) Pegasi. G (76), 74. Near (Bode) Vulpecule. JS DW &c. Near s (Bode) L Vulpecule. ? Near m Pegasi. DW &e. Near #, ¢ Cygni. DW &c. Near m (Bode) Lacert. Rpril 26 gy sac CEUs eebetap ti : 321 +31( 8 Js April 19-23 832 +42 ¢ 5 13 _ \(B distance + 0-06) The rough approximations of a few of the slenderest ciream-Lyrid radiants to some hypothetical comet-showers, which this Table shows, ar e much too loose to allow any certain inferences of connection to be drawn from them, but the resemblances in the cases of the second and third of these accordances are perhaps sufficiently well marked to merit attention, and to give occasions for renewed investigation. A list of sixty-seven cases (omitting the four indubitable comet- showers of the Lyrids, Perseids, Leonids and Andromedes) of similar loose agreements between observed meteor-showers, and hypothetical comet ones, — by Professor Herschel, appeared during the past year in the pages (p. 369-395) of the ‘Monthly Notices,’ immediately preceding those of the paper by Mr.Denning which has just been quoted. Of these accordances” it is enough to say, that while single instances occur where the corre- spondence is tolerably close, they are in all such cases unsupported, at _ present, by corroborative determinations, and that they have among _ the numberless similar questionable instances of comet-likeness, and even See Oe. PF Ae Pe ~ ant av Nee re oe oe “aw 5 : ‘ \ 4 ey NO NS Ape 4 342 : a _ Ruront—1878. Patan of questionable determinations of the meteor-showers themselves, rather the appearance of being accidental coincidences than clear proofs of real resemblance or of positive identity. The cases of the accordances (noticed above, pp. 326 and 335) between the comet of 1870 I 8, and the August Perseid shower in 1871, and of the comet, 1825 II, 8 (— 0:115, Oct. 7th, 134° + 77°) with a briefly enduring meteor-shower, noted by Mr. Denning on the nights of October 3rd and 4th, 1877, at 130° + 79°, are perhaps exceptions. Mr. Denning wrote that he never noted a shower better than this rich one during the two nights that its activity was at its maximum, and that in place and date of its appearance, its agreement with those of the hypothetical comet-shower was quite unexpected, and is practically perfect. This shower is un- noticed in the accordance (No. 49), where the observation properly belongs ; but when duly inserted and added there to the previous tokens of resemblance to the comet which showers observed by Heis and - Denning are shown to present, it would be the best marked, and most certainly verified accordance of any of the nearly positive and deter- minate ordinary cometic correspondences which are recorded in the list. Mr. Denning also communicates the following meteor-shower positions as haying escaped notice in some of the other accordances of the list which are here briefly denoted by their reference Nos., the comet’s node, and the omitted meteor-showers. ° fe} Aug, d—12......... 54 + 28 Schm. 39, 1864 IL 9 ype. Sn. 52 + 20 (11 | s) DS, viii. 13. Aug.—Sept....... 50 + 20 Corder, 1877. 44,961 2&0... Sept.—Oct. ... 59— 9 (20 Js) DZ. Sept.15—Oct. ... 154 + 41 (9s) D (77), 90. 54, 1739 9 Sept. 8—Oct. ... 155 + 41 (13 |s) DZ. Oct. 29—Nov. 13 160 + 40 (8 Js) DS, x., 18. BOs UOT PO) acecas Oct. 12-13 ...... 23 +13 (7 Js)DZ. The following accordances are new :— 42017901 @... Sept. 16 ....... 108 + 37°5 (W.) + 0:05. J Sept. 16-20...... 108 + 38 (10 |s) Heis (77), M,,. Sept.—Oct....... 111 + 37 (20 Js) D &e. Oct 2=19.s2.25%2 108 + 38 (19 Js) D (77) 108; suspected also in September. i "(2 56a. 1849 1g... Oct 29... tide eps Wets2=1/8%, 0 Js 167 + 75 (5 Js), (78). 92; a feeble shower. Boys Thy. Sew 164 + 74 (5 Js) DZ). Noy. 4—Dec. 19 160 + 71 GH (74), KG) _ aprpy ae Motte 180 + 65 Schm. if oe The lists of cometary radiant-points (‘N’ in the northern, and ‘S’ in the southern hemispheres) at pp. 232, 234 of the volume for 1875 of these Reports, it may also be noticed here contain a few important errors, which require the following corrections :—N. 59; for Sept. 2, 57°+2° read Aug. 22, 57°4+21°,—N. 45; add and Q; for (13 to) 27 read (26 to) 27.—N. 43a (end of the list) ; for June 28, 42°+14° read March 17, 34°4+15°.—S. 7 (Clausen’s) ; for 14°-5—0°-5 read 353°—8°.—S. lla (end of the list) ; for March 6 read Dec. 9. Much stress was laid by Mr. Denning and Mr. Greg in two papers = ere.’ rey! ee Sk eet coe yim at ORS, ee | wih ‘ : pr i ‘aad eas Sa , ' OBSERVATIONS OF LUMINOUS METEORS. 343 4 read to the Royal Astronomical Society* in January and April last, on the long-observed duration of some meteor-showers, with stationary radiant-points. That the centres of divergence of ordinary shooting- - stars in general occupy almost fixed positions in the heavens for several days, or even weeks, together, is deed conceded by nearly all the observers who haye recorded and discussed their radiant-points. But a much more strange and extraordinary peculiarity of these showers was believed to have been noticed by Mr. Denning, that after a first appearance, or period of prevalence of an ordinary meteor-shower, followed by a Inll, or interval of entire cessation of its action, a radiant-point will again make its appearance with renewed activity, forming apparently, a repeti- tion of the original fMeteor-shower in everything except its date, at an interval of about three months after its first display. Examples of such recurrences were traced by Mr. Denning, between August-September and October-December, between October-December and February—April, and between April-May and July-August meteor-showers. The end arrived at hitherto, by continued observations, has been to multiply ceaselessly the number of new radiant-points, and to discover sub-showers, as tributary streams in systems which had formerly been held to be thoroughly well isolated and defined. The multiplicity of radiant-poimts which thus accn-. mulate from year to year, are chiefly congregated near the meteor-epochs. of August, November, and April, when it is not unreasonable to expect,. from the numbers which have been recorded, and from the attention. naturally concentrated upon well-known regions of the sky, that fre- quent repetitions of radiant-points, at intervals of about three months. should, in general, be traceable in different seasons of the year. The- slenderly supported evidences of connection between cometary and meteor-shower radiant-pvoints, in a multitude of cases where they very nearly approach each other, is an indication how much chance may have to do with frequent occurrences of such an apparent resemblance, even between contemporaneous radiant-points, and in a list of cometary radiant-points, not unfrequent instances may be selected of recurrences of identical positions, with periods of one or two, and sometimes of three or more, months intervening between them. The theoretical grounds on which the hypothesis of trimestral meteor-showers is shown to be untenable, were clearly urged, in some apposite remarks appended to Mr. Denning’s paper, by Captain Tupman; and, indeed, no deep acquaintance with Physical Astronomy is required, to show that, even if it should be indubitably established by further observations and re. searches, no such hypothesis could be derived directly, in the present state of the science of astronomical perturbations, from any supposed primitive relation of the orbits or assumed remote or recent origin of scattered and diffuse, or of still compact and undisintegrated meteor- showers. Of the circum-Perseid showers of August 6th-12th, Mr. Denning also prepared a list, by projecting numerous meteors of the periodic dates in. the catalogues of the Italian observers (1872), Heis (1852-72), and von Konkoly (1871-76). The positions and numbers of meteors belonging to each radiant, as collectively determined by one or more of those three } , eee athly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. xxxviii., pp. 111-116, and 351. 4 4 PR gee LRU kes, ME FC Rasa Sater an) he Shetek) Ae ae , iitre ; y eth tt Baa yn . REPORT—1878. \ -meteor-records (denoted by the letters S, H, K, in the list) are repre- ; sented in the following table. Circum-Perseid Meteor-showers (W. F. Denning), August 6th—12th. snl aye n| O\- 4H > . Seva 2 S 3 % | Approximate place of the Coroborations from other Radiant 5 o| 2 Radiant by the stars sources ; and Remarks a| oO 5 a 35 a R D (77) 77; rich (10 |s) Aug. 10- °o Oo I 9 tr . ao 5O. 68464 | 55 |S H K.'Near c (Bode) Camelopardil oak in Geode Ke LTE he logue. 62+38 | 46 ISH. |Neare/ Persei ............... 97+71 | 62 |SH. » pq Camelopardi...... 52+75|}51{|SHK.) ,, mo (Bode) Custodis |4 |s onlyin Hungarian Catalogue. COA PAO AS Howes|) a A DOTSCL. «css ssccecedtaes [ey { July 20, 1878, at 78+ 56 | 42 |ISH K.|5° p. SAurigz ..........csee. 76° + 54°); Weiss, Aug. 11, 1869, 77° + 54°. 74446 | 26 ISH K.|Near a Auriga ............... AS Ade at NS FL Kil 55, 8 ECYLSClsensc.ccensccuees WATEreaE aM. Sen |Kiesgatateties Sater cctstcscsectcese uses 92+56 | 18 |S Sako Arise l eche..te cee: 135+76 | 16 |H. 8° n. of o Urs Majoris ... 52+20 | 11 |S. ASSP. @hAUll).onsaswodsceenss 44433 | 16 |S K. |Between Medusa and Tri- angulum. 87 +34 8 |S Weare mre ec. osccss. aoe 345 | ‘ aw / ; ber 13th, 1877, and considers that closer investigation at the end succeed in distinguishing this new shower from those _ of Taurids I and Taurids II (at 80° + 23°). x Circum-Leonid (and Geminid) Metcor-showers of November Ist—15th, (and December 9th-13th). W. I’. Denning. | Radiants’ Corroborative Meteor-showers ; and Remarks. No. of | approx. | [The number of mapped meteors of a shower is noted in Meteors | place by parentheses, thus (9), immediately after the position r) the stars of its radiant-point. } +29 31 |Neare Leo-| { Oct. 15-18, 140° + 28° (9) D (77) 120} A long continued nis October, 140 +23 Schm. shower; meteors +28) (Dec. a re Dec. 12, 136 +30 Masters. with streaks like 9-12) Jan. 1-15, 140 +30 (6) DS. I, 19 the Leonids. +48 26 |Near«Ursz|Oct. 2-19, 130 +47 (11) D (77) 110; active, max. Oct. Majoris 15-16 ; seen also in September. +38) 23 Hn Leo Mi-|) Oct, 9-18, 153°+42° (4) D (77) 90.7) Exact radiant +43] (Dec ae pes Dec. 9, 1868, 150 +43 DZ. ‘i close tou Ursee 9-12) Majoris Jan. 1-15, 150 +43(7) D8. I, 20 Majoris. Radiant en- Y : Oct. 28—Nov. 13, 133 +8F a0) +31 for Caner -T.14 5° cs D(77)139< dures a Nov. 25—Dec. 13,131 +32 (6) long time. Distinct from 127° +14 13 |At} (8, ¢) < m +17° in Nov., No. Garant \ Oct. 15-18, 120 +15 (9) D(77)119 118; long-enduring +15} (Dec. Fr » Jan, 1-15, 120 +15 (6) DS. I, 25] shower of short 9-12) swift meteors. (A long- Oct. 11, 128 +20 T. 88, suspected. | Snduring +20 17‘ |Nearé Can-} J Oct. 15-19, 133 +21 (18) D(77) 118 | anboots cri Oct. 28—Nov. 13,127 +17 (12) , | with] Oct. 29—Nov. 13,135 +21(12) DS X17. j MA One Dec. 21—Jan. 5,130 +20 D W. \ Sse Jan. 1-15 130 +24 (7) DS. 1,7 : : 2 ee AgDec. 9-12' 5 » |} Feb-—March 12 129 +22 (19) DS. 11,7 eu: Feb. 13-16 132 +23 DZ. tee L vember. | | An elaborate paper of reductions of the observed paths of 2,450 shooting-stars, of the first 20 days of November, by Herr Louis Gruber, of the Imperial Observatory of Vienna, was communicated last year to the Academy of Sciences of Buda-Pesth, and it also forms an appendix _ inthe January number of the ‘Memorie degli Spettroscopisti Italiani.’ | From the miscellaneous collection of these meteor-tracks, Herr Gruber extracts the following places and durations of twelve November radiant- _ points, of which he also indicates in some measure the characters of ~ importance. As the paper is of some length, and the conclusions drawn from it are of considerable interest, the Committee is obliged in the present | notice to confine itself to this indication of its value, and to an acknow- _ ledgment for its obliging communication to the author. “i ¥ Of discussions of the proportions of meteor-magnitudes, by Mr. E, F. | Sawyer of Boston, and by other observers ; of papers of great interest r eT RE SY Le NM iedal se eee Pio ACI hy ied th) Red ee 346 ‘ ¢ HRERORT HBT Sx iris pile. eS ’ i ee” alle) ae) on the history and distribution of meteoric matter in planetary and ~ terrestrial rocks, and in the sea and atmosphere, for which it has been — indebted during the past year to the authors, Dr. von Tschermak, Mons. Daubrée, Messrs. S. Meunier and G. Tissandier, and Mr. John Murray, of Edinburgh, the Committee is also obliged by the length of this Re- port, while recording the value of their contributions to the subjects of which they treat, to omit a short review until a more favourable oppor- tunity ‘permits it to give full and appropriate descriptions of them in another year.* Positions and Durations of meteor-showers in the early part of November, by L. Gruber, 1877. Date of A ‘ IC (Ohi re pees * a Per cent. No. of meteors, or importance of Shower /|Duration] Max. i se the shower Nov. | Nov. P I. 1-18 | 13-0 | 148 = 19 Leonids, 26 p. ¢. of all. (1) 12 y 140°5+21 |Nov. 12, 1871. A double radiant-point ; “|| 149'°5+12 | of the Leonids observed by L. Gruber. 14°5 57+ 30°5 |Taurids, 22 p.c._,, oe 1-18 { 6 55+19 Do. 52 |s, Tupman. Il. 414 13°5 | 111+59:5 |About 10 p. ec. of all. IV. 1-18 |135 | 62453 |. ,, ae WA 9-12 | 11 70 +19:5 |Remaining radiants about 33 p. c. of all. VI. 2-14 10 103 +3 | VII. 1-18 18 135 + 52 VIL. 9-13 | 13 | 100441 ) in.@ 3-12 | 6 | 12545 X. (aly 8 10+39 s oi 4: gaa ae | ‘ ” No radiant, Tachini 356° + 87°-5, foun nile jada bas Bi6 aagl { near the North Pole. 2511 PR ee aa | 3 { ner ha position included on this line. II. Account or Arrouitrs. By Dr. Fiicur. Found 1858-9.—Staunton, Augusta Co., Virginia.t In 1871 Mallet described three masses of meteoric iron which had been found near Staunton; another has now been brought to light, and examined, It was found by a negro in 1858 or 1859, who brought it to * With the exception of the notes on meteor-magnitudes and colours (‘The Observatory,’ vol. i., p. 399, and ii., pp. 20, 23, 97), and of the discovery of spherules of magnetic oxide of iron in various ancient sandstones, and in different specimens of sea mud, by Messrs. 8. Meunier and G. ‘Tissandier, in vol. lxxx. of the ‘ Comptes Rendus,’ a short account of all the above recent papers on meteoritic subjects is given (in the ‘Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society,’ vol. ¥xxviil., p. 219-221) in asketch of the ‘progress of meteoric astronomy during the year 1877,’ communicated in the Council’s Annual Report for the past year, in February last, 1878, to the Royal Astronomical Society. A Paper by Professor D. Kirkwood, read before the American Philosophical Society, on March Ist, 1878, should also be noticed here (see ‘The Observatory,’ vol. ii., p. 118), showing the probable inde- pendence of the stonefall occurrences of the 13-14th of November, and the system of Leonid meteor-showers of the same well-known meteoric date. t J. W. Mallet. Amer. Jour. Science, 1878, xv. 337. JOU IK a Ca OSE a nal aha ' i ans ies Aa Oh ei AN tds ney ; ‘ OBSERVATIONS OF LUMINOUS METEORS. , 347 Staunton, and endeavoured to sell it. He failed to do so, and threw it _ away behind a blacksmith’s shop, where it lay several years until it was _ used with other loose material to build a stone fence. By reason of its __ irregular shape and great weight it soon fell out of the fence, and was next used by a dentist as an anvil, on which to hammer metal plates, _ and for such base purposes as the cracking of nuts; then it was again built into a wall round the curbing of a cistern. In 1877 it was _ removed to Rochester, N.Y., and a fragment of it came into Mallet’s _ possession. It weighs 152 pounds, is 45°7 em. in length, and 29-2 em. in breadth, and in shape somewhakresembles that of a shoulder of mutton. A sketch of the mass is given in Mallet’s paper. The specific gravity of the iron is 7°688, and the metal when etched, exhibits the Wiedmannstiittian figures ‘clearly and beautifully.” The composition of the iron was _ found to be: , ea tg ee OS es Oe i ea OT 91-439 UNICO ceectioh «tt oe¥nchsobeys cep cch .cutessceasbcous 7559 Wopallts, Wiece ehc-k.cuwcBecbudte st agdhecaescare st ound 0.608 WGPPEDS a ocdocaccdecdsaf.cessgoad-setee tes 0-021 SELEY Se van ostede caheaeeotechectscgcaseat trace Phosphorus ...... -. 0°068 DSULOhUE S. Atians ais. .ied.thedsoagieedteotiecch catered 0-018 CHIP nIne 5. Asche cdeesecks eee Gelde saotlon Itech css trace CAEH ONY | re oswow sce Meise ote lebas ee dete cacaels ceed 07142 Silicium (reckoned as silicic acid) ......... 0.108 99-963 There can be no doubt that the four specimens found in the same neighbourhood represent different portions of the same meteoric fall. 1861, June 28th (June 16th,O.8.) 7 a.m. Grosnaja (Grosnja), Banks of the Terek, Caucasus. Russia.* Sixteen years ago Abich, who was at the time in Tiflis, sent to Gustav Rose, in Berlin, a short description of a large fall of meteorites at Grosnaja on the morning of the above day. The greater number appear to have fallen into the river Terek; one fell in the great square in the interior of ' the (? Staniza) barrack, entered the ground to the depth of 13 feet; it pursued an oblique course through the air, and was distinctly warm when dug out. The meteorite had the form of a huge hailstone, and was covered with a black crust. Abich, who has taken up his residence in Vienna, placed the stone in the hands of Professors Tschermak and Ludwig for examination, and the results of their investigations, together with a detailed report of the _ circumstances attending its descent, have been incorporated in the paper _ by Professor Tschermak, referred to in the note. Tt is stated in the report drawn up by General-Major Kundukof, military commandant of the Tschetschensk district, that on the night of _ the 15th-16th June (0.S.), a barely dark one, there (was neither thunder, wind, nor rain. On Friday, the 16th, the morning was clear and bright ; _ light rain-clouds, which however brought no rain, hung on the western _ horizon over the station Mekenskoi, the inhabitants of which were startled at about seven o’clock by a deafening sound, which continued a long Space of time. A non-commissioned officer of the Mosdok regiment, who was walking from the Navursky to the Mikenskoi barracks (? Staniza), i *@ Tschermak, ‘ Mineralogische und Petrographische Mittheilungen,’ 1878, 153. Os GGL $06 £96 GLE gout 6+ 9g+ Of gg + 6+ 661 Fo + oFt FL+ 9+ 66 + Lyt 19+ 87+ 96 + RLS FFt via OGT 866 SLT 181 8g1 LFL 96 0g S&1 GLI LL O8T > b+ 62a €S+ {66 : ze Suruuac jo, spwubig , Es 69+ SOT S 8h+ ISI we 9g+ Gz ‘s mt: #9+ 108 18+ 9IT 5 fo) ° “03 Wu (S90) 9180 380 “W'S - ~~ - ~ Sent Ke ND ‘ON a | ee Se eee POeeeUeeeOeeCerre Terre reise See e mR R meee twee eres H eee eee eneeesens Pere ree eee eer eee ee SPW , sesseeeessensaseneennane’ 5) MORT 8 sPusel 4sel se amieg see e rw ereeeeetons (@7) Z “49 jou) Annee eee cnet eee eee e eae eens een eees ere rrrer ree rr rer rere ree eee er err rere rere re teeta wen eee eee tease eee Seeeonees SPUWDLA , See ee Bet eter e eee w eee eet eee aes eeeeeeeeees terttiaeeeeeeeesee mong slpishraele(asieen me QE 49 you) SORES spryyun.upon() » you) A eee ewe ere mne ree eee reesssseeenes Pee eeereeerrey Tere ee eee reer Were ree ere UrEererrrrr eres 4 enter eee e nears ere aee ese eeegee eters Hee eet ene eee wneee = oules teeta eee eeereneeeeres weneeee Hee neem eee e eee meee ee eee eeeweseaees SUOT}BAIOSYO s109}0 JO ‘ON : ‘ry ‘d “UW Ad ‘SHLMOHS YOULAN TO ANVHOTVLVO (2287) 2 pe ee ee ae sheers mene eeeee GG-G [udy seeeoT AVW—8T [dy “12-8 Tady sere eee weeee 8Z-ST judy wereetecsose 66-81 [udy seeeeesosees G6I-8T qudy vereTT AeW—sT Tady eeoeereeeserees SI-z [udy ago niaaennin scenic BO-F [dy 6g [Mdy—é€I yorryy “ST Tudy—1¢ yore 6 dy—F yore iersereeaete OF BORED “ ¢ [dy—sT yorryy GZ-g Your] GI-L ores “FEO-LL “2d ssanehe ootesto oe gf Pada sonst ar aiedag LE-F “PT 96-% ‘uer 0g-3 ‘UeLr Os-T ‘uer 00, ‘uer seat eeseeees ew eeeeee * Aenea nw eeneenee eee we eeweeee tte er -uep—g teteeereneeenes G7_OT beter OTT Up * 6I-OL “wer 66-4 “Ue €1-6 “uer * eee tema ee eee ee enemas eeeeeeeeeae Lee e eee eeeeeeereee sees eee eeeeneee t (MON POPPE e eee meee tere w ee eee eeseeees Haseeerseseseneeaesasenenes MONT | Sa oe spowdowsng a TPO PPP PPP PPP eee ee eee ee Pee eee eee - A, eS ~ oF T& 06 LG L¥T 06 ST 0g Ol 98 6I 86 6€ 6 ol & G& LY 61 91 8 g 6& 9& OL ie LG Si Or Or LT ST LT FEL 6g 6ST 106 iL ee ; LE aEgeAON— 2] FOO) °"" FT “AON —GZS "390 “"" OT 00q—LT “490 eeeeereenenees ETT “AON see088 9g “AON—=LT “490 tt" 6% D9 —LT “PO “8 gT ‘09q—QT ‘AON EI “AON—§ “900 eedivnseeen 2 OT AON * FL ‘AON—§ 490 eee eeeeesees O$-9T “qydaq eee eee vert ecees 8a-1 dag { [é-LL “390 “TT qO—Ts “ydeg eences G T “y90—6 T ‘qdagq eee eet eres 6a-Fz “dog er Oa ‘490—9T dag peer eeeeeses Tg-91 “deg eee eee eesenees Og-T ‘adeg “TE 400 —@ze “ydeg 96-01 “dag 66-E3 “ydeg Ti IGE | ‘dag " OS-IT ‘4dag sere eeeeeeee 0g-Gz ‘ydag GT ‘AON—T "390 eeoeee ¥Z "490—T *ydag se ceeeeeereseas 91-8 “qdaq eet anette eetee O8-T “qdog “SG-11 “ony IIIS eT “Suy eeerecrere co — Senet ‘ouy leseneeenenege Ty “Bay * 18-6 ‘Sny Preuve TERE) 16-6 ‘suy seerseereenenes G7 ag ‘sny CORTON 2) 3) ‘SuY weneee seentee See seeeeeeeeees ate oS oo N co ais tary ra) { * rod Sa —~Q [22] me ~Q ad N a 9L'ST'N Il W (¢D¢L Gc To krade es HY 2‘) 61 “10 LID 9T “10 $1 “10 DEO OL “0 _v ee on | 2 | Y av, = eee] Sie 5 poe Ct a ’ OF+ GET . e9+ SOr (CAST “SLT “BLT ‘SON) 4 ert+ 19 €9+ gor ze+ GOL (00q) 82+ 82 CE+ $8 {MON Lo+ FI | e8+ 10z Z+ GFL LG+ 992 61+ 09 09+ T s9+ 2 6-6 GP + - (4dog ‘Suy) g¢+ 18¢ (4°99) 9G+ & Set OF 98 + 9o+ a+ 09 + LE+ Lot ‘oad WH (Set) 9181 “3%0 ‘V'a : ‘PMNNQUOI—SUAMOHY WOTLTW LO AAVOTVAVY L181 SIAH * spina) s:Z S9L = i) [ttt eeeeweronees (683 + 01 you) Perce eee ** (O18 + o98T 0} 018+ 003) eee eee ree eee ee ee ree : SpLUoIT « SPUNNG, , “Tn y}qnog eee ee eee er eee ree ee Tee eee Terre eee ee ere Ty ween ewe nee eeeeee teeeeseursreeveeeees GT W = | Trteeenesseseensneseeeeeree MONT seer 90 G5 — BL aD Hietereesseseseeneees | ggg, ssteeneaeeseeseeereserr@T MT a J TN e meee rere ee ee eww reese eta eeeetees | “MON HeeeeseeensereereeenreT 7 ef Tteeeeeneaseesees — smyyraUagy , SUOTIVAISC, 0€ L¥ SI109}9 FV JO “ON A Rene eeeeewenes IL-8 OI-8 §1-2 Li=é &6-L [I-8 Hieteeeeeeeseen ee oT Peeves eererene eee weet eneee seeeee Tote ere eeeeenee €1-3G ES ea teens eee TT $6 “997 —9 &L-6l 6 ‘99d —ST &¢ 929d —6 see--5¢—GT “AON T6 “99 —G “AON 9T-€ Silene seenneeesar “AON —Z FL “AON—ZG seeeeoz -Qa(T—T nee ewer n et one FI ‘AON—Z T€-L1 to Ga & tenes FI *AON—8 I seneee FI *“AON—JT seneee G I *“AON—L L qoody ‘00 09, 09] ‘00q 09] Pryar 20] Ya “AON "AON “AON “AON “AON “AON, "390 "300 "390 "300 "400 ‘0 ‘PO “AON "8 000 —F3 "PO * FI “AON—LT "30 "390 "390 "490 9&1 OO SIT 99 NEG G6 ¥G tL OL OL OIL StL G86 6GI+ 89 6g BS O} il OG } LIS g¢+ ag St GZ re & + TAG L& GF J 18+ 0&3 S16 99+ ST Tél 8&6a 14 GOL €8 Gis 2d. v— | { | 92] ‘SyWerpeyy [e}OT, ‘0d ‘VE ‘UOLHISOg JUBIPLY > ‘om Nea ‘doud JO SISATVYNY “eZ I8Sl “eZ GLT &@ “XD 66 “ID WA OBt ST W S Hig 4 cp 10 a . HHOAs oO a A Sol a AK 9) ‘F839 | SI V 6 {ATV G7 FS (aks | GE 4S Tg 49 al | ely ‘$i | a1 Do ST LIN el W "49 SGI A 6 é a pS) a a) | ae) c¢ : 1S OBSERVATIONS OF LUMINOUS METEORS. 353 A List of Radiant-points of Shooting Stars, from the observations of J. Zezioli, at Bergamo, during the years 1867, 1868, 1869. By J. V. Schiaparelli. (Extracted from Prof. Schiaparelli’s Work, translated into German by Dr. G. von Boguslawski, ‘ Entwurf Beiner Astro- nomischen Theorie der Sternschnuppen,’ Stettin, 1871, p. 84-101). The Remarks condensed from Notes in an Appendix of the original Catalogue :— Ref. A NO. Date of Shower I Jan. 6 2 “- 6 3 ae PLO 4 aa Dee 1clL8o9)'= ss 11-12 7 ee Ne 11869). =, 18 9 ca tig 10 Beg 11 aa 12 aig 13 tb COE 14 5 ot 15 07 '5% 16 ai 1S 17 ae ashy 18 eer iaay 19 |(1868) ,, 28 20° |(1868) ,, 28 21 » 29 22 Ae Sigg 23 sity ot 24 erst 25 Feb. 1 26 Some 27 ee 28 ‘DG 29 —G 30 Ie Ng 31 Pi A 32 AO 33 or es 34 is ode 35 a 36 ao Oe 37 = aie 38 jie 39 ale 1878. Position of Remarks Radiant a ry o fo} 199 +58 175 «+48 10 +57 47 +40 183 +28 120 +57 232 +36 198 +28 218 +437 244 +64 200 +59 205 +49 218 +29 210 +20 195 +56 132 +67 205 +47 67 +25 236 +25 198 +54 225 +34 134 +40 221 +28 215 +30 153 +21 212. +22 130 +49 240 +62 187 +31 183 +56 133 +26 232 +30 105 +62 205 +651 263 +68 133 +55 214 +53 74 +48 Observed on both days 184° + 28°, 182°+ 29°; 2? = MG (G.& H.);and = & 1792 II (Weiss) ; accordance doubt- ful. Radiant accurate, from 21 meteor-tracks; AG (G. & H.) 68° + 20°, December 20— February 6.—Scattered radiation, the radiant being 151° from apex of earth’s way. 4 January 29, a.m.; 134 meteors counted, 61 mapped, in 1" 45™; two observers. Radiant diffuse, but no other trace- able; 24 tracks with this place. = M, . (GG. & H.), 128° + 40°, Max. January 25-31. (? = g 1680, Weiss.)}. = M, (Heis), 171°+ 56°, February 1-14. = A,;, , (G. & H.), 73° + 40°, Februar 9-17; and = A , (Heis), 76° + 40°, February 15-28. AA 354 REPORT—1878. A LIST OF RADIANT-POINTS OF SHOOTING-STARS, &C.—continued. Ref Position of No! Date of Shower Radiant Remarks a 5 ie) fe} 40 (1868) Feb. 17 237 «+46 41 a 9 240 +56 42 Mar. 17 186 +56 43 ee) 144 +48 | = M, (Heis), 150° + 47°, March 16-31. Radiant region elongated ; its centre . being 131° from apex of earth’s way. 44 Pte 238 +24 45 0) TSO) Watts Sesoe 46 April 1 261 +47 47 s 2 212 +51 48 Ce ee 130 4226 49. |(1868-9) ,, 248 259 +38 | Observed both days, 258°+36°, 260°+ 40°. Apparently distinct from QH, (G. & H.), 268° + 25°, March—April ; max, April 13, 1864. 50 enh) | \(O55= er 36 51 ath sera 246.) G46 52 Salo 163 +47 | = M, (Heis), 160° + 49°, April 20 period. and 56 ss, id 168 +47 Not visible between April 10 and 14 (No. 56); ? if connected. 53 BS ae LLL 193 +20 | Radiant region diffuse ; may perhaps be grouped with §,,8, (Heis). 54 Be ls 231 +27 | Agrees with ¥ 1847 I, except in perihe- lion distance : (compare No. 143). BB Pa epee 66 56 (52) een te! 168 +47 |131° from apex of earth’s way. 57 > dd 263. 4-50 58 wo 14 | 240. 55 59 peal wedeiae On. 60 1323.) 250 + 40 61 sy) 2D 142 +53 |Radiant well defined. Observed in zenith ; 143° from apex of earth’s way. 62 a) 256 +75 63 ir 20 260 +24 | = 4 1748 II (?; observations of comet and meteor-shower not very exact.) 64 Be eg 182 +27 | 131° from apex of earth’s way. 65(70) \(1867-8) ,, 30 237 +35 |And 1868, May 1, at same place-= Q, (G. & H.), 235° + 30°, April 23—June 4; and Q, (Heis), 232° + 27°, May} 1-31? 66 May 2 | 204 +35 67 SP) = | 2a8c a 36 68 aes i263) +38 69 3 = 22 300 +44 : 70(65) seas 232 +25 | Forms perhaps with 65 and Q, (Heis)) acommoneroup. Agrees better than 65 with Q, (Heis). 71 » 24 240 +44 72 » 24 207 +47 73 » 24 302 +30 74 3 ab (W280 4 54 75 , OB) Heer, +89 | 76 <6 WORT 69 17 June 2 227 +30 78 as 9 207 +37 —— OBSERVATIONS OF LUMINOUS METEORS. 355 A List or RADIANT-POINTS OF SHOOTING-STARS, &C.—continued. ee osition of a Date of Shower nee temarks a 5 79 (1867-8) June 14 28 +35 |Compares well with W (G. & H.), 280° + 29°, May 6—June 20; and Schmidt, June, 284° + 38°, 80 lt 300 +41 81 5 28 | 269 +44 82 wise 2S al AOD 4927 83 Sul mel) 240 +19|Good agreements with Q, (Heis), 242° + 12°, June 1-30; Schmidt, 255° + 23°, June; and Q, (G. & H.), 245° + 21°, April 283—June 30. S4 July 4 3 +68 85 » 56 | 222 +60 86 = 5 304 +45 87 ah iB 247 +29 88 + 6 289 +3 89 3 8 288 +64 20 - 9 280 +40 91 aur Ol O47. 60 92 SHELL 300 +49 oO: fel 8 +44 | 94 rls iP B88" Eb 95 3 14 270 +51 96 » 17-18 | 244 +59 97 LS 272 +44 98 oo. 18 _.| 382.435 99 i) 18. ? | 317, +47 100 5 18 | 342 +23 | Schmidt, 345° + 25°, July 5-25. 101 » 18 | 324 -+69 |B, (Heis) July 15-31, 320° + 70°. 102 337 lS 315 +61 103 sutik, 1398 ot A3 104 » 19 | 332. 423 105 fy als) 355 +60 |Plane of orbit perpendicular to the ; ecliptic. 106 ete) 334 +45 107 oe fed 330 +64 108 33 rece 240 +76 109 pyrite 313 +40 |[‘Cygnids ’ BG(G. & H.), July 4—August bent! 22 Qmax. July 30), 315° + 31°; Schmidt, July 5-30, 317° + 32°; B4 (G. & H.), and Nos. 99, 112, 116, 120, and 126 in this list are perhaps con- nected with it. 110 or ye All Il +38 LL S te. QO +55 112 $crt 2B 308 +42 | 113 wow 23 336. . +30 114 » b2h 309 +61 115 on. Mig 330 +88 116 a) PA; 303 +41 117 oe 298 +36 118 soe 174 +55 |Schmidt, end of July, 165° + 62°; V ! ‘ (G. & H.), July 29—September 6, | 172°+ 60°. Good agreement of orbit ae p with comet 1737 II (Weiss, Schmidt, Schiaparelli). 119 ore 28 336 +30 120 Sy ZS 305 +35 AA2 356 REPORT—: 1878. A List OF RADIANT-POINTS OF SHOOTING-STARS, &C.—continued. 140 141 142 143 144° 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 Date of Shower (1867-8) July 29 » 29 » 30 (1867-69) ,, 30-31 » 30 » 31 ye eal » 3 ” 31 Aug, 1 ” 3 ” 3 ” 4 ” 4 ” 5 ” 6 ” Lf ” 7 (1868-9) ,, 10 (1869) ,, 10 » Il » Il » ll » 12 » 28 Sept. 5 ” 6 ” 7 5B) 12 » 18 ” 20 » 23 » 28 Oct. 5 Position of Radiant a oo 266 278 345 275 24 47 47 340 321 5 ° +52 +36 +40 +37 +35 +18 Remarks Schmidt, end of July, 277° + 40°; and 2B, (G. & H.), August 2—September 25, 285° + 44°; observed three times by Zezioli. Schmidt, August 1-15, 338° + 30°. Agreement with T, (G. & H.), June 29; —August 24, 338 + 13, ‘ Pegasids’ doubtful. Perihel. in §. lat. 90°. (Perscids) ; agreement of orbit with that of comet 1862 III almost precise. Many allied radiant-points contiguous to it; see Nos. 132, 137, 142, 144. Accurate ; 9 meteors in 12 15™, 2° dis- tant from earth’s apex. Radiant of comet 1862 II (August 19), 47° + 13°} (Weiss). N,, (G. & H., and Heis), August, nea N. Pole. But for its small perihelion distance, tail fragments of the great comet 1853 III may have produced this shower, or No. 135, (very doubt- ful; Weiss and Schiaparelli.) ca Schmidt, September, 309 + 67; B (Heis), September 16--30, 311° + 65° ; and ? E (G. & H.), August and Sep- tember, 335° + 52°. Slightly observed. R, (Heis), Sep- tember 1-15, 53° + 35°. R, (Heis), September 16-30, 46° + 37°. A. S. Herschel, September 27, 1864, 85° + 50°; F,,.(G. & H.), September 17 —November 24, 83° + 50°. OBSERVATIONS OF LUMINOUS METEORS. 357 A List OF RADIANT-POINTS OF SHOOTING-STARS, &C.—continued. Ref. Position of BF | Bln" gToe “Styl Bee oO "IIL . spesmbaz 5} Tt | st+ 69¢ js 62 |FL ‘3deg—Fz “Snyloz a I. sporadoyssyg 8 | F9+ @1 OL ‘sny ‘StOH .09+ oll | * * Bletige ot LS gael eae 7 ; OH 009+ oT HL [tree gt-e “Snyl ¢9 4+ ST { AON] § OOT * 66 AML! og pt adeg—Fa “Snylep+ ec at ae [ ‘ste 09s ob J OZ [FI “3dog—Fesnycr+ ¢% Il | 9t ‘3dag—e “ny! of + 72 ( MON} J OOT i! Ltuozus10T OF + oLeS oF a AMEE 0s 9p dice Aime! 19+ 98 (of Fo ok8=ZE)! OOT | eet 92 S-ydeg “sny ‘stoojout | cg ee el ce + 7¢0: ty il Aine ie G‘xopIOD OF + OES 86 |p “sdag—er Aine ae si 96 | 06 390—€ “SnY| 9¢+ 08 abe ee bats ydog 73 ¥: I , #medoneen) ss 86 08+ J L“Suy‘sepr69 p09 og f| 2h |) S SAV—SI Aimeitat 8 02.) 91 Sny—9 AINE) got+ 2 TI, Sprwoonegy 5} 8h | 9 2 GSE Zz ‘adaq—a 7. 2 T oe Poe ae . : al ae : I ne I9+ G86 | 9 | Counc) LT-9 AME} L¢+ 08Z 301 | -§§ _ upiee | i og gut : Ue ‘BUY ‘SIOH of + o0EE| 8 Peete g-ydogiog + Tes hAB oS 9 Aime] 98+ 2 +3) 00 “yoy é od ail = L als Crepe =e Fe) oe ea see ‘ocd R >, Say “aU008 o€8 + ae IL | g‘Sny—1 Amugige + tee | FL | ot Suy—g Ame] get GFE a sees . 7 ‘ Seren ene w eee 2. ‘0d °6 ¢ sessed O83 ae ae : 7 8 g‘onyigg+ Lee | IT | 91 Sny—g Ane] ye + oce ¢ Z S) oLF + oL&E) 9 6 ‘suy—sT Aee¢+ ose G1 | Lt AMp—gz oung| oF + aie *SpULouory cg | IF+ oF Lf 7 -ony—GE if : : ‘ 5 5] al UL Ame ‘STOTT ZE+ FES * * here < 92181 91 alt = = Ps FS i. 06 oFG U-sny—o9 Aue f Gh+ OFS z eee ° fe} fo) oO aaa 29d “WT 09 wee : as SUOT}VATOSYO #0 pa Se Sy qoody 0d “WU BZ yoodsy ‘09d “WU i b to + gL8T ‘va 3 oe | 8 a ____| staatasqQ Surpuodsert0g |= aOR POr o§ aepsu OMNGOTVIEN §,.59LH “ITM O}G werner gigr ssuruueg | 4 ‘iy ees i essa x A DIE, 359 OBSERVATIONS OF LUMINOUS METEORS. ‘read oi JO JTey 4siy at} oy ‘auto styy Sutpacerd “ AI-I so[qe, ‘S\STT aatyeredutoy ay} oF ‘28T-OST ‘dd ‘sqxodey esau} Jo dSumMOA 4seT 84} 999 ~ "90 “dag "MON "MON { AMON! "MON Spaslag 5 { MON ydag— Aine ‘suy—oune “spyuy “(SIOH off + 0818) ‘sny—ouny *qydog—Aqn¢ | MON “spiny , (oLF+ 068 pInoys) “AN 4ydag—sny “cc aq ‘IT , spusnbag , T .spisvbag LT . spwbhg ELT x * F6l ( OFT * * sOL é 89T 18 SOT Ye; LOL 101 SOU L06 66 6) $06 i 861 601 SIT S61 “ee 16 96 Ost 18 Lo+ FI * * FO+ $9Z "496 M * 9g+ FP f29a—" PO Lep+ 9F LIE LOE GI§ LEG ne i=) on + GOE { 18% ote LIi+ 8&§ 96+ S&S 69+ GOE 8h+ 60E * StoH Ur YON Sto UL ION * "ZS “390 089+ cOFZ STOH ‘66 AML o9E+ 086 BSuruue ‘stop SoTL + 0&6 * aha IOPLON olF + olF Il °9d—TE-GT Ladag ‘SIOH 009+ SF * f sxopI09 [8+ of OF) U ‘dag Los— oFSeS rap10g “ydag o8G+ ofOE * TapIoy “SNY 09+ o90E “dag IapION E+ oLDE * eG “dog “TapION oL8+ o89 seoeere tl Oe Teta Ca f ‘qprayog Usny ‘Ame ot —ofb3s accor oneeone vod pea EAT Jf ydog USny “ap10p oI — ose s Jessen SOE oQ— e98E f tapxop “SN olf + 0686 C ‘) ‘OL SUV oZF+ 0862 STOHTE-9G ATUL o8E+ OE eg ony “dng, o2I+ OS sf ‘opto Lqdog “ony 921+ ae J Af ‘repr0og = Lydeg ‘ounp oF3+ o1eeJ ‘op ‘LT “ony of9+ oL0E *Iap10/ Usados “ny 087 + of0e &G 8& Il ci 9T Or 09 *% * 8I FL ‘qdog—Fz “sny|T9 + tteeeeeee TRG ‘SY Ih+ ‘op 63+ g ‘sny—sq Arneig9 + FIL “ydeg—er Ampig9 + gony—et Anc|yg + sasaennne: T= “‘Sny wt * * FI “ydog—Fz “ony eg + g ‘suy—eq [ne * Zony—éT Anping + FI ‘ydog—eT Ane * g sny—s¢_ Angie + FI ‘ydog—Fz “ony Fg + FI “ydog—Fe “ony zg + g “suy—er Ane * Slee l= Tae ile g ‘ony—er Aqne Z ‘sny—s¢yT Ayne FI ‘ydeg—e] Aine | g ony—eT Ayn FL 3dog—eq Amp at + Hatin rT —G +ydag FI ‘ydeg—ey Anes + FI ‘ydag—Fe% “ony og + FI ‘ydog—et Ampigp + LT OOT 06E 096 P&G 186 96 * §1 * * % * * x0 Sle Po ame © ae we él 0% 390—F *ydag * * OK OK OK gre gT=e ‘Sny 06-6 “PO teereeeee Tg Aue * 91 “ydeg—e sny ey ew tocenenee TR Ame teeeerees Tg Ayngi 0% “}0—F “3deg QT ‘sny—g Ayn Pf" ZI ‘ouy—gz oune treeerees O79 Aye 9 ‘Sny—g Ang gT ‘suy—g Ane gt ‘sny—g syne 9, ‘sny—¢ ‘ony, *or ‘sny—ge oun: ZI “sny—It Aine * 91 ‘Suy—oz ounr Pel tnesesoee, pT—9 Ame| Fa+ SI * * * * * sot eh sat 9g 8+ 128 * 19+ 118 9+ 908 eet ere Le+ 99a. LL+ O18 18+ 91¢ 8— 86% TI= 82 TI— 218 | OL— OFe SE+ 168 OL+ oge OL+ Oe | Si+ OTe 96+ gee * og+ gies | . “MON * * Heteereeereeeenes STOTT UT 10N % * | # | 2¢ senteees Qe ‘390) 6F+ S01 d9q—AON IOF ie “197) £1ap10 £099 + ol@1 w ler 2 G 7 eters ey, 3 OF + GEL 98 GLI on LS Gae 9F+ NET 1990 LeprIOH \, Ree BRlel §&T “AON—66 ges O&8T ST |"Sl‘AON—F “ydeg] LF+ OST sual 0:88 PHOS WHOLIS EP Bemanesasasncsacdogesc se .Nee tier beater sao betas 0:05 100-00 The portions (I.) gelatinisable with and (II.) unacted upon by acid have the following composition :— UNCLE TACION (seanecsseeaants DOUG Mewecepeeawerts YER Phosphoric acid ......... OS Siteceem epee 0:07 PAUKTTYE UCLA ceils cial als ois bisigpinsiei5 (AUST shoongecocan. sc 5:07 Tron protoxide ...........- AOD: cts acon aeeeercts 8:03 Nickel oxide ............ UGLY Saesetsanaoooce — Manganese oxide......... ch testeacianaestern’ 0°63 TRING Re eumeshiclss's opetrcats sea O;G22eeeeeredoncane 3-41 IM ENESIA s.cccessesccdsescns AOA T iii iilaseses 2o'D4 Odd) Seren sete dabseepeo se OAS Brecteteaerssacr 1:38 JROIB NY. ose Gaocacsocsao UBIO os sonbaadsc cane 0:23 (Oyniloyrhal Maa S oeccag sony O51 8 teecaciyesetiece re — 100°25 99°73 In the soluble portion the oxygen ratio of acids to bases is 20:08 : 21:16, and in the insoluble part 30°64: 15-08. In addition to olivine and bronzite, this meteorite appears to contain an insoluble felspar and a little apatite. 1877, May 17th, 7 a.m.—Hungen, between Steinheim and Borsdorf Provinz, Oberhessen.* An eye-witness of the fall of one of these meteorites states that, as he was passing through a wood, on his way from Steinheim to Borsdorf, he heard a noise as of thunder, although the sky was cloudless, followed by a humming, hissing, whistling sound, such as would be caused by a number of stones rapidly rushing among the trees. One stone struck a pine tree close by him, severed a branch about the thickness of the finger, and fell at his feet. It wassome time before he could convince himself that the object before him was not alive, but when he at last ventured to raise it from the ground he found it was cold. Buchner visited the locality five months later and found a second stone, weighing 26 grammes. The first must have weighed more than 86 * O, Buchner and G, Tschermak, ‘ Mineralogische Mittheilungen,’ 1877, 313. OBSERVATIONS OF LUMINOUS METEORS. , 367 grammes, and a portion of it weighing 73:26 grammes has been deposited in the mineralogical collection of the University of Giessen. It has an irregularly triangular and flattened form, and less than one quarter of the stone has apparently been removed. It should be stated here that Buchner learned from several who were able to bear witness to the occur- rence, that the sound attending the descent of the meteorites proceeded in a direction from N.W. to S.H. The freshly fallen leaves of mid- October rendered hopeless further search for the other stones which must have fallen. The crust of the meteorite is dull black and thin, and exhibits here and there granules of nickel-iron. The fractured surface displays a grey, occasionally brownish, matrix, which is traversed by a very thin but very conspicuous brilliant black band of material; it runs obliquely to the flattened side of this stone, and is also found in the smaller mass, picked up five months later, which evidently never formed part of a larger meteorite. On another part of the fractured surface of the larger stone, a second black line, parallel to the first, but less brilliant, is to be seen. Abundant particles of nickel-iron and troilite are met with; and the crust appears to consist, to the extent of one-half, of the metallic alloy. Examination under the microscope shows the ground mass to be colourless and transparent and to be fissured in every direction. It appears to consist of olivine. Some olivine spherules are quite conspicuons, surrounded either by the black material or nickel-iron; other chondra have a banded or radiate structure, like those observed by Tschermak in the aérolites of Shergotty or Gopalpur, and appear to be bronzite ; and lastly, there are spherules of a homogeneous grey translucent substance, devoid of or rarely traversed by tissures. Buchner states that the meteorite of Hungen, while a member of the most common class of meteorites, can easily be distinguished from those which fell at Agen, Girgenti, New Concord, Kuyahinya, Kriikenberg, Pultusk, and many others which he mentions. » The smaller stone was presented to the Vienna Collection, and forms the subject of afew notes by Tschermak in an appendix to Buchner’s paper. He describes its characters, which nearly approach those of the Pultusk meteorites. The black crust has the unusual thickness of 1:5 mm., and encloses particles of nickel-iron, granules of magnetic pyrites (troilite ?), and even lustreless chondra, which may consist of chromite or picotite. The transparent minerals constituting the chief mass of the stone are of three kinds : 1. Olivine, recognised by its rectangular cleavage and few included minerals, and by its contributing but little to the chondritic character of the stone; 2. Bronzite, in granules and aggregated crystals, showing a prismatic cleavage, the latter being either barred or radiate, or contorted and forming the greater number of the chondra; and 3. Diallage, for such Tschermak believes to be a brown mineral, forming angular fragments, which are found not to be rhombic and to resemble an augite. The chromite occurs in granules and in larger crystals than are met with in other meteorites. This interesting stone has not yet been analysed. 1877, June.—Cronstadt, Orange River Free State, South Africa. _, All that I have yet been able to gather respecting this occurrence is, that a shower of stones fell near Cronstadt in June last, in a wooded district, so that few of them could be collected. One of them is preserved in the British Museum. 368 ; - REPORT—1878. 1877, October 13th, about 2 p.m.—Soko-Banja, N.E. of Alexinatz, Servia.* [Long. 20° 53’ E. of Greenwich; Lat. 43° 38’ N.] Déll’s paper, which appears in the ‘Transactions of the Austrian Geological Societiy,’ contains two descriptions of the fall of meteorites at Soko-Banja, drawn from two different sources. The first, taken from the Servian weekly literary journal, ‘Javor,’ published at Neusatz, is written by an eye-witness of the occurrence, who states that the 13th October was fine, and the sky clear, and that about two in the afternoon a noise as of thunder was heard resembling batteries of cannon firing briskly. The sound was followed by a violent concussion of the air, and then a number of aérolites were strewn over the adjacent region. One, weighing 10 okas (224 Austrian pounds), fell in front of a house in Soko-Banja, and was driven deep into the earth; a second, which touched the ground at Scherbanowaz, near the Rtanj Berg, weighed 30 okas (673 Austrian pounds), and is the largest mass which was collected. The peasants at Rtanj state that one which fell in that locality was of the size of a sack of flour, and that by striking against the rocky surface it was dashed te fragments. From the second and later report, provided by Ritter von Stefanowitsch, of an inquiry instituted by some scientific men from Belgrade, it appears that two explosions, like salvoes of artillery, were heard, accompanied by a brilliant display of light such as attends the bursting of shells. A dense black smoke was observed at a considerable altitude, which broke up into three columns, and gradually changed to a white smoke. The noise lasted for some time, and then the sound re- sembled the firing of musketry. The air appeared to be shaken. Soon after the explosion commenced a number of meteorites fell to the ground over an area a mile and a half in length and half a mile in breadth. The following masses have been collected :— 1. One, weighing 23 okas, fell in the village Scherbanowaz, and penetrated the soil to the depth of four feet. (This is the one mentioned in ‘ Javor.’) 2. One, weighing 15 okas, fell near the vineyard at Soko-Banja, and reached a depth of three feet. ‘This appears not to be the mass referred to in ‘ Javor.’ 3. Two stones found at Blandija. 4, A fragment, weighing 2 okas, was found at Prevalac. 5. A meteorite of small size fell at Gradi¢ (Prevalac and Gradié are hamlets, west of and close to Soko-Banja). 6. A number of pieces of various sizes fell at Dugopolje, and several very small stones are reported to have fallen on the Djeviza Planina. One fragment, 2 okas in weight, fell on a pear tree, and then de- scended to the ground; a man who was under the tree took it in his hands, and received the impression that the mass was still warm. The meteorites were sent to the Natural History Museum at Belgrade. D6ll’s paper contains two little maps indicating the area over which the stones were strewn. He describes a small specimen which came into his possession: the matrix is bluish grey and compact, enclosing spherules which vary in size from that of a millet-seed to that of a hare-shot, and which project from the fractured surface. But little nickel-iron or * B, Déll, ‘Verhandl. der K.K. Geolog. Reichsanstalt,’ 1877, No. 16, 283. S. M. Losanitch, ‘ Berichte der deutschen chemischen Gesellschaft,’ 1878, xi, 96. OBSERVATIONS OF LUMINOUS METEORS. 369 magnetic pyrites (troilite?) could be seen. He noticed patches of a brown colour, which he considers characteristic of this meteorite. Losanitch, in his communication to the Berlin Chemical Society, which appeared subsequently, states an interval of 25 seconds elapsed between the appearance of the meteor and the first explosion, which was followed by two others. The explosion occurred at an altitude of 7000 metres. The path of the meteor made an angle of 220° 50’ with the magnetic meridian, and followed a course from N.E. to S.W., with a very rapid descent. The track of the meteor has been calculated by Kleritj, and the details are to be found in ‘Glasnik,’ the journal of a Servian learned society. He makes the entire weight of the stones, whole and in fragments, to weigh 80 kilog. All the meteorites are coated with a black rough vitreous crust, 0°5 mm. in thickness, exhibiting numerous depressions. The interior consists of spherules of various sizes, some brown, some yellow, cemented together by an ash-grey material, and presents the appearance of a trachytic lava. In polished sections, prepared for microscopic examina- tion, nickel-iron in granules, hackly fragments and filiform particles are to be recognised. The specific gravity of the meteorite is 3°502. The meteorite consists of— I. II. Nickel-iron .........sesceeees SS yeesnceseccceods 37 DULICATESD, csecacctusscaces sence SOPs ete 96°3 100-0 100°0 and a little iron sulphide. A fragment of the nickel-iron, which was separated from all adhering silicate, possessed the composition— = 7813 = 21-70 = 017 100-00 This is a high percentage of nickel; the ratio of the metals is— Fe: Nias 4:1. The iron sulphide was found to be the mono-sulphide, _ and to contain 63°84 per cent. of iron; theory requires iron = 63°64 per _ cent. Analyses of the complete meteoric rock, containing the metallic alloy and iron sulphide, but freed from all trace of crust, were made—(1) by treating it with hydrochloric acid and caustic potash, which removed constituents amounting in three cases to 60°50 per cent., 61°44 per cent., and 61:79 per cent.; and (2) by determining the ingredients of the portions (I.) acted upon by, and (II.) withstanding these reagents. They are as follow :— I. Il. BUlLCIciacidyy ss. ssh. vebeecsescsiss cies Sawn hee teon: acces 56°66 Tmorbproboxidery, arate gcesteesscstees ASA iechdsciateh eo'gs cs 23°55 Manganese oxide .............ss0ceees WALD) eons pearepnogoc 0:003 MG OTIESIA) br. avccevecesssuavectresuccs esse GUE) Sopeaoreere 20°84 HOGA ee cessaccnsee settesccen yg pean ee ie (055) rdnupeaenodteee — PO DASARI ee seen tc gher re nested te 0:09 TROT] <¥ 30k tetas ace sens aCe 0:70 Nickel, ssesccose meta snolnavereecaanoes aces 0-17 : nwa tHe = 4:31 Iron monosulphide = 6:78 1S = 247 Chromite Phosphorus 1878. 370 REPORT—1878. Neither alumina nor lime appears to be present in this meteorite, and augitic and felspathic constituents are consequently absent. The oxygen present in the two silicates amounts to— 1 aE Gil TCLCHACIG Ee eeayseearrcsecee~cctcesseses IF PLL essa Basasconccc:-cabaoodece 306 30°22 Iron protoxide......... 631 a § 45) [5°23 ” : Magnesia ....eesseeese0s Dey tS GDS ote The soluble portion, therefore, is an olivine, having approximately the composition represented by the formula 2(3 MgO, 3 FeO), SiO, ; and the insoluble part a bronzite of the form (3 MgO, 4 FeO), SiO; the ratio of iron oxide to magnesia being the same in both silicates. ; 1877, December 26th, 8 a.m.—Between Hohr and Ballendar, near Coblentz.* A correspondent of the ‘Coblenzer Zeitung,’ dating from “ Hohr, 27th December,” writes that on the preceding day two meteorites fell near the road leading to the former frontier, in the direction of Bal- lendar, and that the fall was attended by a very characteristic explo- sion. The editor of the above journal has been unable to gather any further particulars of the occurrence beyond the fact that the stones fell in a wood, and could not be discovered. General Directions, and Instructions to Observers, for Recording Meteors and Aérolites. Much industrious labour and attention has of late years been bestowed by experienced and eminent astronomers on collecting and discussing meteor observations, and on deducing from them a great variety of very important astronomical conclusions. Materials of constantly increasing interest have in consequence accumulated somewhat rapidly in recent years towards the extension and development of the astronomical theory of these bodies, a clear and exact exposition of which, dealing only with the most positively ascertained and clearly established features of their history, would here be too wide and extensive a subject to be properly discussed at length. The astronomical problem of their origin, which is set before us by the appearances of meteors of the most dissimilar descriptions, is naturally too extensive and too diversified a question to be included in a single theory, or to admit. of only a single explanation ; and it is not at present so much to the causes and to the origin of their occurrence that it is desired to direct particular attention, as to the best means of observing and describing accurately the various notable appear- ances which they present, and to the most convenient and effective methods to be followed for preserving useful records of their ordinary and extraordinary exhibitions. The phenomena of luminous meteors may be comprehended, in the first instance, under the leading titles or descriptions of a few general and appropriate designations (long since introduced, and still very con- venient to rate and record them by distinctly, although not completely and sufficiently), for the immediate practical purposes of their registra- * ¢Coblenzer Zeitung,’ December 29th, 1877. | OBSERVATIONS OF LUMINOUS METEORS. 371 _ tion. In their orders of magnitudes meteors may thus be distinguished as either— I. Telescopic meteors, only rendered visible to the eye by the aid of telescopes ; II. Shooting-stars, visible to the naked eye, and comparable to the : different apparent magnitudes of the fixed stars in bright- Ness ; III. Bolides and Fireballs, or very luminous meteors, comparable in. brilliancy to the planets Jupiter and Venus, and to the dif- ferent phases of the moon, and sometimes even rivalling the sun by appearing with much splendour in broad daylight; the term Bolides being usually applied to the smaller, and Fireballs to the larger kinds ; ' IV. Detonating, or “Aérolitic”’ meteors, fireballs which produce a audible explosion, like a distant cannon’s, a peal of thunder, or an earthquake’s shock, by their concussion with the air; and which differ accordingly from the last (as “forked ” light- ning often does from distant or “sheet” lightning) only by the thunderclap that not unfrequently reverberates from fireballs of the largest and brightest class ; or finally as— V. Stonefalls and Ironfalls (the latter very rare occurrences), or the falls of meteorites, either singly or in a shower, it may be, of many thousands of fragments from a fireball, which, especially if seen in the daytime when these occurrences are usually observed, is almost always a large meteor of the last-named description. . ct For each of these different kinds of apparitions it is necessary to furnish separate and somewhat independent directions and instructions _ to enable good and useful accounts of their phenomena to be pre- served. I. Telescopic meteors are not unfrequently noticed during astronomical observations ; and some singular records of the occurrence of such bodies by day and by night in dense showers have been placed on record. The point to which a telescope is directed (in R.A. and Decl.), with the hour _ when such an object presents itself, and its brightness compared with that of fixed stars seen with the same telescope, is to be stated; and the position-angle of a diameter, or radius of the field of view drawn parallel _ to the direction towards which the meteor shot should be determined in the degrees or quadrants usually adopted by astronomers (making the allowance for inversion of the image which the telescope requires) with as much precision as can been ensured. The length of path, if not pro- longed beyond the view of the telescope, can be stated by comparison with the known width of its field in minutes or parts of a degree of arc; and deviations of straightness, change of brightness and appearance, of the head, during its passage, as well as the persistence on its track of a streak or of sparks, if visibly remaining, should be noted, with the duration in seconds, as nearly as it can be estimated, of the meteor’s flight while the nucleus was in sight. A streak will often mark the line of passage of a meteor which crosses the field of view too swiftly to be followed with the eye, and the breadth of this light-streak in minutes or Seconds of arc should then be noted, with its brightness and duration, appearance and changes of appearance, and with the magnifying power of the telescope employed. A star spectroscope should also be used BB2 372 REPORT —1878. if possible to observe its spectrum, if it is of sufficient brightness and duration. As it has been contended that telescopic meteors are rendered visible by optical power at vastly greater distances from observers than ordinary shooting-stars can be seen, and that their apparent speeds and lengths of path are, under these circumstances, greatly reduced by distance and rendered inferior to those of the majority of meteors, observations of small telescopic meteors with short slow courses, if they occur, should be carefully recorded, in order to determine if they are principally seen at low apparent altitudes, and moderate real heights only, or with equal frequency at all angular altitudes above the horizon, and therefore at all possible heights above the earth’s surface to which the use of astronomi- eal telescopes of the highest powers and apertures enables us to extend our sight. IIL. Shooting-stars are observable with a certain frequency on all cloud- less nights. The result of an attentive watch on such occasions to note their frequency by a few hours’ observation, especially if in the absence of the moon, is of great value; but the fitful activities of many meteor showers often combine together to render a rate of frequency concluded from a single hour’s observations deceptive and misleading; and atten- tion must be paid to noting the middle-time of the watch to the nearest quarter of an hour, as upon its lateness in the night, as well as on the season of the year, depends the average horary number which a single observer may expect to see. In comparison with that of an evening hour at six o’clock, the number visible in the same morning hour is about double, and nearly as notably greater for a midnight hour in August or September, than for one in February or March. For an average midnight hour in the whole year, Quetelet estimated the horary number visible to one observer in a KHuropean station as about six meteors; and a greater number than twelve or fifteen meteors seen in an hour at an average time of night and season of the year, may be regarded (though not certainly) as indi- cating an active exhibition of some special meteor shower. It is to the ‘prominency which such exceptional phenomena sometimes reach as meteoric spectacles, that the distinction which has arisen between shower meteors and sporadic shooting-stars is entirely owing; and from the partial extent of our present acquaintance with the directions, intensities, and durations of multitudes of weaker descriptions of such showers, in- numerable shooting-stars must still be regarded as “ sporadic ’’ until well- determined centres from which they appear to diverge accurately can be definitely assigned to them. To note and reduce shower meteors to their radiant-points is a task of little difficulty to an observer already conversant with the positions of the principal fixed stars, and of the constellations. But the use of star charts ‘properly adapted for projecting meteor- paths soon familiarises unpractised observers with this preliminary preparation ; and facility is soon acquired in drawing upon a map the initial and end-points of a meteor’s track, and in prolonging through these points a straight line backwards on the map, or tracing, to show by a simple inspection of a number of these lines their common crossing point, or the focus of emanation of the meteor shower that they belong to, in the sky. The natural impressions of direction are of slender use in endeavouring to fix this point correctly by the eye alone, retracing the meteor’s track among the stars themselves; a ee 7 i OBSERVATIONS OF LUMINOUS METEORS. 373 ‘straight wand held up to direct it, soon assuring an observer that the eye without an assistance of this kind is a very fallacious guide. But by using for the picture of the stars the same principles of plane perspective representation which are used habitually for pictures of ordinary objects, the straight wand and the straight path of the meteor in the sky when drawn upon the map are also straight lines, and may be prolonged, not only with greater ease to other parts of the map than in the sky, but also by a pencil they may be marked indelibly upon the page or sheet, so that comparison with many successive lines thereupon becomes not a doubtful and uncertain, but an easy and perfectly unerring operation. In accord- ance with the most recent practice of Herr von Konkoly, of Komorn, in Hungary, as well as of the late Professor Heis, the Committee has pre- pared celestial charts in plane perspective, with whose assistance the posi- tions of the centres of departure of different meteor showers can be easily verified and investigated by observers, and further particulars regarding their intensities and durations may be ascertained. As a guide for the selection of meteor showers for special study, the Committee refers observers to the Key Map and General Catalogue of all such known meteor systems published by the British Association in the volume of its Annual Reports for the year 1876, by Mr. Greg ; where the relative importance, as resulting from the richness and constancy of meteor- showers, in returning at the annual epochs of their visibility is stated and represented. ‘The principal characteristics of the meteors, including their colour and brightness, the apparent lengths, speeds, and durations of their flights, and the presence of sparks or streaks in their tracks, have hitherto been very little noted, and such peculiarities belonging to the showers, as well as their dates of principal abundance, and the exact positions of their radiaut points, form very important and interesting subjects of inquiry. The observation of sporadic shooting-stars is necessarily less attractive: and suitable to ordinary observers than mapping the apparent paths of meteors belonging either to the well-known major and “special” or to some minor annual meteor showers. But as regards the observations,. the method of procedure is the same, with the exception that long-con- tinued watches maintained fora whole night are, in general, indispensable~ to a successful collection of their tracks by a single observer. Shonld no indications of a new shower accidentally occur by unusual frequency of meteors from a new radiant-point in evening watches of a single night, yet the detection of such a shower is no uncommon recompense of an observer’s vigilance in a morning watch, or among the meteor-tracks recorded on a few successive nights. As the same remark applies to the accidental vision of bolides and fireballs, the same instructions will suffice, and the same course may be pursued most advantageously by observers in recording sporadic shooting-stars as in describing large - meteors that may be occasionally observed; and these in the next para-.- graph will be more fully indicated and described. II. Bolides and Fireballs have the singularity among meteors, and the~ pre-eminence over shooting-stars of attracting the attention of a great number of observers. This is also the case with meteor showers when they are sufficiently abundant to lead to general observations and to con- clusive determinations of their radiant-points, although poor and scanty showers escape this identification for lack of a sufficient number of observations. As, however, by the displacement of his point of view, a 374 REPORT --1878. fireball seen by every new observer appears to him in a different part of the sky, or virtually as another meteor, it follows that both for fireballs and for very scanty meteor showers the multiplication of observers of the phenomenon by increasing the number of meteor tracks belonging to the same radiant-point, suffices, when they are sufficiently exact and numerous, to fix its place exactly, and to determine the direction from which the meteor shower or the fireball took its flight. Hxactness in describing a fireball’s apparent path by the stars or otherwise is the more desirable and important, because no doubt exists that any two such re- corded appearances of its path must belong to the same meteor ; and that, therefore, when prolonged backwards to their intersection, if they are fairly accurate they will be sufficient by themselves to point out its radiant-point or the direction and distant origin of its real course with satisfactory precision. But even a dozen meteors of a poor and scanty star-shower only afford presumptive evidence of their having a common direction and radiant-point at the centre of divergence of their tracks, as scarcely any other evidence but this divergence, in general, exists of their belonging to a common system; and to increase its probability a fresh number of meteors of the same shower must be noted, and must be traced back to the same centre of divergence. Observations of sporadic shooting-stars must, therefore, be greatly multiplied (however accurate they may be), while two accurate observations only of a fireball are absolutely necessary to determine the exact direction, together with the height and distance, and the other particulars of its flight. This fortunate concurrence of two or more simultaneous observations is sometimes recorded of a shooting-star ; and then the real direction of this meteor is as certainly determined as that of a fireball, and the orbit of either (which is the sole clue that we can gain to its astronomical history) is known as certainly as the orbit of a meteor stream. But such accuracy of observation as would allow us to depend upon two observations only is seldom, if ever, reached by observers, either of shooting-stars or fire- balls, and of the latter class of meteors especially, many scores of accounts are annually indited by unpractised observers, containing no material data (or only conflicting ones) of the meteors’ courses, while the accordant notes occasionally furnished of shooting-stars by well-skilled observers show the difficulty, if not the hopelessness, of arriving by two observations at anything approaching to the accuracy of instrumental determinations. With rare exceptions, therefore, a large and abundant collection of observations is needful for exact comparisons, which it is the object of the Luminous Meteor Committee appointed for this purpose by the British Association to obtain, by providing observers with suitable forms of registry, maps, and instructions for recording the appearances of fireballs and ordinary shooting-stars. The Committee distributes to observers who apply for them printed Forms of Registry and Directions, as the most convenient and efficient means of assisting them in systematic observation. For the best means of noting and describing exactly the appearances of large meteors the Committee also directs attention to a letter in the ‘ Scotsman’ (daily newspaper) of May Ist, 1878, by Professor Herschel, from the full paragraphs of which, pointing out the features of position and appearance to be recorded, it is not necessary to repro- duce here:a long series of appropriate suggestions, as instructions for recording large meteors and ordinary shooting-stars will be found sufficiently illustrated in the Committee’s printed Forms of Registry and OBSERVATIONS OF LUMINOUS METEORS. 375 in the remarks on the process of mapping and projecting them eraphically on star charts which have been offered in the last section regarding them. The following recommendations to observers on occasions of the occur- rence of aérolitic meteors, and of the falls of meteorites, describing the points of information most desirable to be recorded regarding their characters and appearance, have been drawn up at the request of the Committee, to conclude these practical directions, by Dr. Flight. IV. Detonating, or Aérolitic Fireballs.—In recording observations on the passage of a meteor across the sky, the points which it is most desir- able to arrive at are: such data as will allow of our definitely noting the direction of its path and its point of extinction, the duration of the luminous phenomenon, and of individual phases of it, the apparent mag- nitude of the meteor, the Imminosity as compared with other brilliant objects, and the changes which it may itself exhibit in this respect during the transit, the duration of the train (or “ streak’’), and the changes it may undergo before extinction (whether it fade away simultaneously along the entire length, or break up into a chain of luminous fragments) ; also, in cases where the streak is one of great persistence, the manner of its final disappearance ; again, when the meteor has been observed near the time of sunrise, or sunset, what change it wrought in the appearance of the visible train by the increasing, or waning, light of the sky. The sound attending its passage, if any, and the character of the sound, as regards intensity and duration, whether single and well defined, or a series of minor explosions closely following one another. And finally, the time of appearance, and that of the interval before the explosion is heard. While it is barely possible for one observer to record all the data referred to, he should not fail to note such of them as may have come clearly within his observation. Other spectators may have remarked what he may have missed, and their joint observations may enable us to arrive at a complete physical history of the meteor in question. It is desirable to determine twa points of the track of the meteor, as far asunder as possible—the points of appearance and extinction are to be preferred—and to indicate the former by reference to some star or constellation which it overlies, and the latter by some object on the horizon against which it is projected. In cases where the meteor is seen in daytime, the data to be arrived at are the point of appearance and its angular altitude. The former may be estimated by noticing what con- spicuous object lies vertically below it on the horizon: a village or a mountain peak. The more distant the object is from the spectator, the more accurate will be the determination of this element of the observation. If objects to which reference can be made should be wanting, the direction may be temporarily noted, and subsequently determined by the aid of a compass-needle. To learn an angular altitude we dare not trust general conclusions, however carefully arrived at; even experienced. observers may be misled in such cases. If a vertical object, say the roof of a house, or the top of a tree, happen to lie in the direction under consideration, the observer should approach it till the line of sight of the origin of the course of the meteor skirts the summit of the terrestrial object. The observer has now to determine how far he is removed from the object selected, its vertical height above the plain on which both are situated, and the distance above the ground of his own eye, in order to be in a position to determine the angular elevation of the point of appearance of the meteor, the position of which he desires to ascertain. 376 , REPORT—1878. The apparent path of the meteor is often represented by a line like a bow: in other words, the meteor apparently ascends, culminates, and then takes a downward course. This motion is, however, for the most part, as has been stated, apparent only; and is a consequence of the varying inclination which a straight line appears to form with the horizon at different points along its course. The observer should endea- vour to determine as accurately as possible the apparent inclination at those points of the meteor’s arc, or line of flight, which can be most readily identified, such as the beginning and the end of the track, or those where a break in the luminous train occurs, as well as that portion which lies parallel to the horizon. The point of extinction should especially be noted, and this is the more readily accomplished from the fact that the attention has been steadily directed to observing the luminous phenomena preceding it. In regard to the point of appearance, it is of importance to determine whether the impression made on the observer was that he had witnessed the blazing forth of the meteor in the sky, or whether the meteor had entered his field of vision, and a portion of its luminous track had not been seen by him. It is, moreover, of importance to arrive at a knowledge of the length of time occupied by the meteor in traversing the sky; this may some- times be learned by counting the ticks of a watch, or by advancing in the direction of the object at a uniform rate, and counting the paces taken during the observation. It should also be noted whether the meteor moves onward with an accelerating or diminishing velocity. The brilliancy of a meteor larger than the fixed stars of different mag- nitudes can most conveniently be compared with the light of Venus or Jupiter; and in the case of the largest meteors, with the apparent brilliancy and magnitude of the moon in her several phases. The colour exhibited by the meteor should also be carefully observed, and any change of hue along any part of the path should be recorded. The luminous train left after the disappearance of the meteor is sometimes very persistent, and often terminates in a cloud, faintly visible. Any peculiar structure exhibited by the train, or cloud, should be sketched on paper. The sound attending the flight of a meteor usually consists either of several distinct explosions, or a crackling rolling detonation. The closest attention should be given, after the extinction of the meteor, for the arrival of the sound and the length of the interval, carefully noted with the watch. Of the many points which, as has been shown, it is desirable that a record should be made, an individual observer can obviously determine but a few ; all those of them, however, to the accuracy of which he can certify, are of vale, since other observers may supply the missing data, and the whole may be collected. V. Sionefalls and Ironfalls.—If a meteorite have fallen, visit the spot where it struck the ground, and examine the hole which it has formed. Determine the depth, and especially notice the direction of the cavity in respect to the points of the compass. Ascertain whether the meteorite was removed from the ground soon after its descent, and whether any observation had been made at the time respecting its temperature. . Make a note of the material forming the surface layer, and state whether it was moist or dry. Further inquiries in the neighbourhood may lead to the discovery of other meteorites which had fallen at the same time, Oe ON THE EXPLORATION OF THE SETTLE CAVES. 377 and at points not unfrequently miles distant. They may vary greatly in size; and stones as small as a pea or bean may be sought for. The meteoric masses with which we are at present acquainted are—l, heavy metallic bodies, covered with a dull, often black, crust, sometimes having a pitted surface (meteoric iron); 2, heavy metallic masses with a more erackly exterior, and hollows in which the presence of rocky matter can be recognised (siderolite) ; 3, and rock-like fragments, often grey, some- times white, and occasionally, although rarely, black in the interior (sometimes little brilliant particles of metal are observed, disseminated through the matrix), and always coated on the exterior with a black fused crust, sometimes dull, sometimes lustrous (meteoric stone). _Me- teoric stones are sometimes broken by the fall and the interior revealed ; by the disruption of a stone during its descent, the freshly fractured surfaces are exposed to intense heat, and become of a darker hue, but have not a glaze like the actual crust. When fragments of the same shower of stones have fallen some miles asunder, such partially altered surfaces should be fitted’ together, in order to see whether they form portion of a larger mass. The fall of a light chocolate-brown substance, resembling amadou, enclosing little brilliant particles of meteoric iron, may accompany the fall of metecric stones. Sixth Report of the Committee, consisting of Sir Joun Luspocx, Bart., Professor Prustwicu, Professor Busk, Professor T. McK. Hugues, Professor W. B. Dawkins, Professor Mirai, Rev. H. W. Crosskny, Mr. H. C. Sorsy, and Mr. R. H. Trpprman, appointed for the purpose of assisting in the Exploration of the Settle Caves (Victoria Cave). Drawn up by Mr. R. H. Tropeman (Reporter). Your Committee have to report that the Settle Local Committee, with whom they have the pleasure of co-operating, have spent in the course of the year, from September 3rd, 1877, down to the end of June of this year (1878), 1697. 19s. 10d., of which sum 100/. was granted by the Association at the Plymouth Meeting. The remainder of the money has been raised by private subscriptions. At the request of the Settle Committee Sir John ‘Lubbock has kindly consented to be Chairman of the Local Committee in succession to the late Sir James Kay-Shuttleworth. The work has gone on nearly all the year from September 3rd, 1877, with few and very short intermissions. On the 22nd of June of this year owing to the failure of our funds we found it necessary to dis- continue for a time. Fortunately as it was haytime the workmen could leave without detriment to themselves. Later on, as the result of an appeal made, a little money came in and we were able to take the men back again near the end of July. The Committee have to make this year an important announcement, the correction of a considerable but unavoidable error. It is contained in the following communication from Professor Busk to the Secretary. 378 REPORT—1878. 32, Harley Street, August 8th, 1878. My pear Tippeman,—lI received from Toulouse two ursine Fibule, of abnormal size, which in the part corresponding to the ‘‘ fragment of con- tention ’’ so closely resemble it, as to leave little room for doubt that the latter is, or may be, in reality ursine and not human. I am disposed, therefore, to acknowledge that my diagnosis of the Victoria Cave bone was in all probability erroneous, and that, so far as such an imperfect witness can testify, the preglacial existence of man must _ rest upon other evidence. I am unable to leave town for the Dublin Meeting, but shall be glad if you will make my change of opinion in this matter known. In returning the Victoria specimen I will also send one of the Toulouse bones, which are very remarkable, and as regards size widely different from any I have before seen; and with relation to their size it is to be remembered that in your Collection* is one of the largest ursine crania (of the ferox type) with which I am acquainted. : : With kind regards, — Yours very truly, Gerorce Busk. It will be remembered that this bone was found by Professor Busk and Mr. James Flower to bear the strongest possible resemblance to a rather abnormal recent human fibula in the Museum of the College of Surgeons, and was also considered not unlike the fibula in the famous Mentone Skeleton. It was, therefore, considered an undeniable proof of the exis- tence of man with the extinct mammals in Yorkshire. Professor Dawkins supported Professor Busk and Mr. James Flower in this determination,f but we must also add that he was the first to express doubts about it, and further inquiries and examination instituted by him and Professor Busk lead your Committee to the conclusion that any arguments based upon its supposed human character must unreservedly be given up. If it bear an equally good resemblance to abnormal ursine and human fibule, it is clearly not a sufficient foundation upon which to build any views as to the existence, or non-existence, of man at a remote period. In stating this we desire to call especial attention to the fact that this bone is not the only one found in the Victoria Cave which can be supposed to have a bearing on the antiquity of man, and his existence in Britain before the last great cold period had passed away in the North of England. Many bones found in the Cave cracked and split, as savages split them, for the extraction of marrow, have been very properly passed by as at best very doubtful evidence, such fractures possibly owing their existence to falls of rock upon bones lying on the floor beneath. But we cannot so easily explain away the evidently artificial marks upon the two small bones found in the Hyena-bed, and already referred to at length in the postscript to last year’s Report (pp. 218-220). Nor even were this evidence to be got over, can we rightly lay aside the arguments founded on Physical Geology which result from the facts partly obtained in the Victoria Cave Exploration. They are these—l. The existence of certain areas in the North of England where there is abun- dant evidence of land glaciation of a comparatively late age. In the river- deposits of these areas the earlier pleistocene mammals are never found * At Giggleswick Museum, + ‘Cave-Hunting ’ (1874), p. 120, ON THE EXPLORATION OF THE SETTLE CAVES. 379 in the open country, and they are equally remarkable for the absence of palolithic implements, although we know that the same mammals, if not paleolithic men, have overrun that ground. 2. The existence of other areas in the South and Hast where there are not distinct traces of so late a land-glaciation, but where the remaips of the same animals and of palxolithic implements are abundant in the river-gravels in the open, as well as in the caves. We can hardly suppose that this contrast in the two areas can be due to the same destructive powers of nature working with greater intensity in one than in the other, and we are brought to the conclusion that an agent was at work in the one area which did not extend to the other. We might cast about for an explanation for a long time, did it not happen that the areas bereft of the remains are precisely those which show the freshest and most extensive traces of land- glaciation. This may be best expressed in tabular form, thus :— Southern and Characteristics Northern Ar ee ; €a| astern Area Earlier Pleistocene Animals in Caves ............++ Present Present Abundant traces of later Land-glaciation .......... Present Absent Earlier Pleistocene Animals in River Gravels ..... Absent Present Paleolithic Implements in River Gravels ........... Absent Present The progress of the work has been carefully noted by Mr. Jackson, our indefatigable Superintendent, and by your Reporter. During the year it has been almost barren in any evidence of animal life in the beds lying below the Hyena-layer. We began working on the left side of the Cave under the old entrance, and thence in the direction of Chamber B. The material consisted almost entirely of large fallen blocks of limestone in yellow sandy clay with, in some places, ochre. A few bone splinters were found here, but they are unimportant, and had probably worked their way down along the rock-wall from the formerly overlying Hyena-bed. On October 3rd the Settle Committee determined to open ground in a small cave at the foot of the talus of the Victoria Cave, on the left as you face it. It was found to contain brown laminated clay with sand at the sides and interbedded with it. Nothing of interest was found, and work was almost immediately resumed at the Victoria Cave as before. Beneath the yellow sandy clay, on the left already mentioned, we found several large bosses of stalagmite from about two to five feet in height. These evidently indicate an old floor; they rest partly on fallen blocks and partly on others, which may not have fallen and from their form may be part of the solid rock floor worn by a stream. For the present we have left them undisturbed. The remainder of our work has been for the most part along the right side of the great central Hall, made up of what used to be called Chambers Aand D. A row of fallen blocks which had to be blasted lay all along this right wall, but they have not yet been altogether removed. One of the most curious facts noticed in the course of this excavation, is the position of a thick bed of laminated clay which is seen to lie at various angles. Near parallel 5 it was dipping only at a gentle slope towards the right wall, but as the section progressed it inclined more and more, and at parallel 20 dipped at so high an angle as 42°. This is the more 380 REPORT—1878. remarkable as it consists of exceedingly fine and beautifully laminated clay, and this high dip is most regular through a considerable distance, and not only close to the fallen blocks, where it might be thought to have been produced by their fall. Some of this clay is exceedingly black, and may possibly be, therefore, derived from the dark Yoredale Shales overlying the Mountain Limestone, which at the period when the clay was formed probably covered a much greater area, and nearer to the Cave, than that which they occupy at present. Your Committee is of opinion that, though the labours of the year have brought us but a small interest for our money, as compared with the results of former years, the undertaking may be an improving one, and eventually, if persevered in, lead to greater results than any lately obtained by us, and therefore your Committee beg to be reappointed. One member of the Committee, Professor W. B. Dawkins, requests that bis dissent from this Report be distinctly recorded. Report of a Committee, consisting of Mr. Gopwrx-AustEN, Professor Prestwicu, Mr. Davipson, Mr. Ernerrper, Mr. Winierr, and Mr. Torey, appointed for the purpose of ussisting the Kentish Boring Exploration. Drawn up by Mr. Gopwiy-Avsten. I reGret to have to report that during the past year nothing whatever has been done to warrant an application for any portion of the grant placed at the disposal of the ‘“ Kentish Boring Exploration,” the more so as results have been arrived at by private enterprise which certainly give the information sought for—namely, whether Palzozoic rocks, and what might next underlie the chalk formation of some part of the 8.H. of England, as is the case in Belgium and the North of France. So soon as it was ascertained that at the corner of Tottenham Court Road and Oxford Street there occurred characteristic upper Devonian strata at about 1000 feet from the surface, the whole question, and all that it involves, seemed to be answered, and the supposition of the report of the Coal. Commission, which as far back as 1871 had indicated the line of the Thames Valley as that of the course of the said Paleozoic band, was proved to be correct.* One single point remained in doubt, namely—in which direction from the end of Tottenham Court Road may the mountain-limestone and coal-measure formations be looked for ? It may be asked, why is it to be certainly inferred that any such sequence obtains at Tottenham. A satisfactory answer, from our acquaintance with the physical and geological history of the European area, in early times, can be given to this. The so-called “Devonian” is not in any sense a distinct formation, except in respect of priority of deposition ; it is simply an early stage of a series which in progress of time, and over a corresponding area, passed on to what is known as the “ Mountain-limestone series.’”’ Across the whole of Central Europe the order of succession of this upper Paleozoic series is the same—namely, Ist, lower carboniferous or Devonian ; 2ndly, * P, 432, qu. 267. (Mr. Prestwich): You would be disposed then to carry the line of probable coal-measures under the valley of the Thames. Answer: Yes,” &e. ON THE KENTISH BORING EXPLORATION. 381 earboniferous limestone proper; 3rdly, coal-measures. Whenever one of these occurs the others follow, excepting where, as in places, the coal- measures may have been denuded off, or where this may have happened to the mountain-limestone also, The angle which the Devonian strata at Tottenham make with the vertical bore-hole being 30°, it is to be inferred that their general direc- tion there is east and west. The highly inclined position of these Devonian beds was important. Had it been otherwise—had the beds there been found to be lying horizontally—the prospect would not have been encouraging; the two members of the series above the Devonian might be supposed to have been denuded off, or to follow in sequence only at some distance horizontally. The upper Paleeozoic group was not disturbed as we now find it till after the completion of the coal-measures. This holds good from West- phalia, across Belgium, and the North of France, and again in the west of our British area. The preservation of available coal-measures along this line is dependent on their having been enclosed in deep troughs, the results of that east and west linear system of foldings and crumplings to which the whole of this group was subjected. Hence it is that a Devonian limestone reached in the course of such east and west line, and at a high angle (30°), implies, first, that the said band of disturbed strata passes along at that spot, and next that the order of sequence is pretty sure to be regular and complete there. In other words, the Devonian beds come down upon at the Tottenham boring may be safely taken as a continu- ation of the band which crosses Belgium and the North of France, and are followed as the band is there by the mountain-limestone and coal-measure series in a deep east and west fold or trough. One more point remains to be ascertained—What is the direction of the dip of the Devonian beds of Tottenham boring? and then any one of the numerous sections which the Belgian and French geologists have given of their coal-measure band may be taken as a guide as to what has happened here; of these, that of the Boulonnais is the best, because nearest. Supposing that it could have been ascertained with perfect certainty that the inclined beds at Tottenham were dipping north, the in- ference would be that there they had come down on the southern side of a Paleozoic trough, and that the mountain-limestone series would follow next. The thickness of this series in the Boulonnais may be taken at about 400 feet ; and the coal-measure-band would come in at about a quarter of a mile or less from the corner of Oxford Street. On the contrary, had the dip been southerly, then the productive coal- band would occur between Oxford Street and the Thames. It has been already stated that a single point remains to be ascertained, and the object of the present communication is to show how and where that is to be sought for. First, there must be another boring, and next it must be so near to that at Messrs. Meux’s that one may illustrate the other, and so show the dimensions and positions of the Paleozoic bands beneath London; for this purpose the distance from Oxford Street ought not to be more than a quarter of a mile to the north or south. : The Tottenham boring properly considered suggests that the Franco- Belgian Paleozoic band with which coal is associated is continued under London, and is within the narrow limits assigned above. Should such be really the case, it is not supposed that in any such position it could be 382 REPORT—1878. made available ; the object of completing the results arrived at by Messrs. - Meux is to add to our knowledge of the structure of the whole of the band at that place. This would lead us to the direction in which it should be followed both east and west. Considering the vast importance of the discovery of productive coal- measures from the 8.E. of England westwards, both with reference to the present high price of that article in the metropolis and to the many in- dustries to which it would give rise along its whole course, of which the line of country from Liége to Douai may serve as an illustration, the time has come when the results so nearly arrived at at Tottenham should be completed. Half the money spent upon the Sub- Wealden researches at Netherfield would long since have settled the theoretical speculation—that the coal- measures might be found along the line of the Thames Valley. No blame is imputed to the promoters of the boring. During the inquiry of the “Coal Commission,” 1871, much discredit was thrown upon the supposition of an extension of the Franco-Belgian coal band into our §.E. region by the chairman, Sir R. Murchison (see p. 429, and reply of Mr. Dickinson * as to the quality of the Boulonnais coal ; also the evidence of Sir R. Mur- chison, p. 434, and following). As bearing on Sir R. Murchison’s objection, which may be succinctly stated to be, that the formations with which the coal-measures are asso- ciated do not cross the Channel, and that, if they do, the coal that they would contain would be worthless, no better than that of the Boulonuais, T would quote from a recent work of the Abbé N. Boulay,t who refers the Boulonnais coal to his upper category or bituminous coal. Fourth Report of the Committee for Investigating the Circulation of the Underground Waters in the Jurassic, New Red Sandstone, and Permian Formations of England, and the Quantity and Character of the Waters supplied to various Towns and Districts from these Formations, with Appendix, by Mr. Rosurts, on the Filtration of Water through Triassic Sandstone; the Committee consisting of Professor Hutt, Rev. H. W. Crosskny, Captain D. Gatton, Mr. Guaisoer, Mr. H. H. Howrxzt, Mr. G. A. Luzour, Mr. W. Morynevux, Mr. Morton, Mr. Peneutiry, Professor Prestr- wicnu, Mr. Jamus Puant, Mr. Mrtrarp Ruapr, Mr. W. Wuarraxer, and Mr. Dr Rance (Reporter). Your Committee, during the past year, has continued its inquiries into the water-bearing capabilities of the Permian and Triassic strata, and, in accordance with the instructions they received from you at the Plymouth Meeting, have added the Jurassic rocks to the list of those under inves- * P, 429., 234. “In point of fact it is so bad that, though used by a few black- smiths, it has never been extensively worked. (Mr. Dickinson): If the coal is used by blacksmiths it shows that it is good coal.” ’ + P. 11. ‘Les houilles se répartissent en trois catégories universellement adoptées dans le bassin du Nord: les charbons maigres, les charbons demi-gras et les charbons gras.” The Boulonnais coal is referred to this last, ON THE CIRCULATION OF UNDERGROUND WATERS. 383 tigation, which now include the whole of the strata lying between the Carboniferous and Cretaceous rocks. Your Committee have a large amount of information promised them of works and sinkings now in operation by various engineers, and especially by officers of the Government Geological Survey, who are now working over the Yorkshire and Lincolnshire Oolitic districts; and they endorse the opinion expressed by Mr. Edwin Chadwick, C.B., at the Congress on Water Supply held by the Society of Arts, as to the great value of the map of the Survey as a basis for investigation in questions of water supply. Your Reporter laid before the Congress a table showing the area of each of the geological formations in each river basin, from which it appears that of formations yielding— Subterranean waters. Square miles. IB GNI ANG MUVIAS: sce tees csecdscoccssscceascccsecssscade 8,645 QO Fr satan deo sas sacs costes th a desdeaa tecacacuostgetesdesoces 6,671 Hastings sands, Greensand and chalk ............... 11,571 26,687 Moorland waters. Square miles. Granite, Metamorphic rocks, Cambrian, Silurian, AMMO ESTONIAN ges adeseerisccecsiscaceredceecaacecsiaas 11,455 Carboniferous rocks (without the Carboniferous RHE SHOU Meee tam accscenesaads ads Svioenesasesccdces ,080 21,535 Probably four-fifths of the area of permeable rocks in the first list would yield unpolluted water, and would receive into their mass not less than ten to fifteen inches annually, or a quantity, if six inches only were yielded up in wells, of no less than 240,000 gallons per day for each square mile of surface, and in many districts double this quantity, giving a total for England and Wales far in excess of that required for drinking and mant- facturing purposes. Of the Moorland area it is hardly the province of your Committee to speak, but they cannot but call attention to the costly legislation that all extensive gravitation schemes incur, whether taken from natural lakes, as the proposed Thirlmere scheme for Manchester, or from artificial reser- yoirs, as the proposed supply for Liverpool from the sources of the Severn ; and they would call attention to the fact that the Select Committee on the Manchester Corporation Water Bill recognised the importance of the opinion expressed by the Duke of Richmond’s Commission in 1868-69, “ That it appears to us that the Legislature should always jealously watch any proposal for a town taking water from a gathering ground at a distance from it, lest by so doing it may deprive other places nearer to such gathering ground of their more natural source of supply.” Cases doubtless exist, to meet which it will be necessary to go to these sources, especially where the populations have been accustomed to soft water, and it would be dangerous to suddenly change the character of the supply. But in the Midland districts, lying on the Secondary rocks, the inhabitants are accustomed to hard water, the quality of which the labours 384 - REPORT—1878. of your Committee prove might be made, by an efficient system of well- - boring, all that could be desired. Professor Hull has described from time to time the marked south- easterly attenuation of the Triassic and other lower secondary strata, and has given measurements, from which it appears the beds between Liverpool and Warwick, 100 miles, thin out the following rates per mile :-— IRCUMBCIAULS Merc ee nstesaoa cates s>reesnescersearscren 25 ft. per mile. Lower Keuper sandstone .........sseseeeeeees Ss) a Upper Mottled sandstone ...............00000- 5 + GH DIGMDEOS tec). a. veennekedeesessceeuadeeseronces 64 y Lower mottled sandstone ...........sssseeeeee 5 The gradient is less between Staffordshire and Warwick, half the distance— Tae] Seen) SS qagsc acs ongaus qo qpann aqconmodonOb 2 ft. per mile. Lower Keuper sandstone ..........sseseeeeeee “ Burtentbods tethachvesevescacdessstvessens ses sotiere 9 ” With these figures it is interesting to calculate the thickness of the Red beds under the Oolite of Burford, 40 miles south of Warwick; and com- paring them with the results actually obtained in the boring made by the diamond process for Mr. Fox, the rate of thinning is found to again largely increase, reaching eight feet per mile :— Caleulated. Actual thickness. MVGCUITTATES he Mee see icte ct chatted cocaenners e's 6209) 55 + : Lower Keuper sandstone ...........000 Ai 710 Vf 428 ft. IBUNLER BETIOS' Hesecoesceccesnecr scenes Sosa NGI: The details are as follows :— Pump-house, Burford, Witney :— Total depth. Ft, in. Surface—blue clay and pebbles} 38 0 Lost water, at 38 ft. White lias, 1 ft. Blue lias, 1 ft. Lias, 9 ft. \ Oolites, Freestone . Black limestone | Limestone Clay J 148 7 Blue clay, with fossils. 5 with fossils. Light lias. 174 8 Hard lias. 186 8 Dark green lias, with fossils. Clay. Clay, with pebble. with stone binds. ,, with shells, 349 0 Harder clay. Clay, with metal. ; » with stones. 420 0 ,» With pebbles and fossils. 479 10 Clay. . 496 4 ,, with minute fossils. 3 (=) bo i / s) i ON THE CIRCULATION OF UNDERGROUND WATERS. 385 Total depth. Ft. in. Blue lias stone. Blue clay. Very soft clay. 572 0 Stone, one-inch. 616 3 Blue clay (greenish at 610 feet). * - Hard lias clay. 702. 0 Clay and stone binds. Hard limestone. 717 O Limestone and shale. 723 7 Soft shale. 746 10 Soft blue clay. 749 10 Black shale, | ft. 750 0 Green marl, 6 ft. Rhetic. 756 O Gritty sandstone. Green marl 71 821-3 04 Variegated marl Conglomerate Variegated marl a8 { Red and blue marl, gypsum | pying 1047 0 Red marl and gypsum ring Red marl Conglomerate 1172 7 Marl and sandstone 1174 O Red sandstone Dark shale, at 1180 ft. 7} 1205 0 Pale sandstone, with plants 1218 O Coal measure, duns 1244 0 Coal measures j 1284 0 Red sandstone and clay 1308 0 Red sandstone Coal 1850 0 Argillaceous shale oe Higa saan. measures. 1368 0 Alternation of Devonian and Calcareous from sandstones 1380 © Red and green mottled sandstone, with fine-grained bed 1391 0 Red marls, and sandy beds 1402 0 Fine-grained sandstone 1409 0 Red marls, &e. J With this section it is interesting to compare the red beds, probably Triassic, in the following section :— Crossness Junction Out-fall Works. New well:— 1878. River drift, gravel .....s:csccsscsscceseeerses aWoalwich! heds) Jes. eecesc.ac.cccvis oncecs soee Manet sands! . 5 22krecckeecoccsceececees sees Chalk Wpper Greeticand: .....iccssciececeteateces Gault ; phosphate at bottom............... Sandstone, very hard ..........ssceeeeeees Grey BBE peed tees Zags dose Adesivatess cas TRer Mann Dy cuadteduannerdetanccs cde coda. soe sas Groy Sandi rocks ccrccsvertcecicsteccs 2155,’ bo ah mo sasseconeyactn igoanodggocenasdbornda: 9 6 yp OAD) BREA RULE cde eae. ssloeoaetecas 38 «(0 4 ss} selon iauisiel, cat, sere at, Lite 131 6 9) OLE-DO.i)) Meabaetsaitachsshacbeplca tens heveao as tees 14. 6 Wanting :— Ap sR Pe eae ee 170 =6(+) At Charbury, Woodstock, and Enslow Bridge. Feet. NOxtor cue lav gges sees: tasers ns secs ceesce taste tenses Mormbrashi Pens eccestess seekbsiecucpeeosaarsete noes 9) onesie blamiss. tees mess. sas. .cecett a steoesa needs 25) | vot. 90 an GreptiG@olite, TUpperis: aaieccsats ties coach oaedae 60 179 6G + SM LOWEN sts = cbtsts selsnicigs dade s/oep tapes - 70 f TOTIOLMOMELE Bas. nooks on 2> odiqs> gol «> Senensagnes Ft. in. REGIE cts onaesveccielenanecs «svetoc eee Mer SI 1 6. BOOS ORME 2.3.50 12aseeerdatawietce leon eevaxacs ssene 1 6 MPR OTIA ey Clay aestenateeacanacwacsyseisdecdacwsadl se 16 0 Stone floor (septarea)........... Pahncnogaasmaeneaa tse 1 3 20 38 C. EH. De Rance. Geological Survey. Great Northern Railway boring, north side of River Cam, Ches- terton :— ¢ Ft. in MBG reMt dl, sae svete ceric cs ole sockessitavssetecesy, 10 lekker es. - sasnanmamannweincl 2 0 Grave oi ccudages a oeig fasetenk 3}. Leasanalaaead si 10 0 Kimmioridge elay...satetachy.. 0) cesses nctacnqens ke 5 0 412 REPORT—1878. Railway boring, Earith Wash :— Ft, in lay, yell wedictn ...:cosscscssesees 84 0 Hed Clay..2.c:scssnessecmes oe 0 6 Grit ens AER ees 4 6 Hamestone j. cats cv 28+ 048 )’ Which is the intrinsic equation of the eyolute of an ellipse. 4, From formula (4) we can find conversely the tangential equation from the intrinsic. Thus, let S = F(¢) be the intrinsic equation, and then we have from equation (4) Al f(p) sin *p) =F) sin $ bp) -f cosec * J F’(p) sin pag dp. (8) For example, the intrinsic equation of the evolute of the catenary is 8 of tan gdp .. (ph) =cf tan ddd. Hence by formula (6) we get the tangential equation of the evolute y=c¢ {1 —1og (sec + tan o)}- (7) tan 5. Let the tangential equation of a curve be y=f(p), then, denoting the radius of curvature by p, we have from equation (4) p sin $= 5 (f7(#) sin *>), (8) $= TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION A. 459 and, therefore, the intrinsic equation of the evolute is ssing= 7a f’(o) sin *o). (9) 6. If the tangential equation of a curve be given, we find the tangential equa- tion of its evolute by equations (6) and (9). For ifv= f (p) be the tangential equation, the intrinsic equation of the evolute is =2f'(p) cos 6 +f""(P) sin > ; let this be denoted by F(p) and by art (4), the tangential equation is given by equation (6). Now from the value of F(@) we get F’(f) sin 6 =3f’(¢) sin d cos P+ f’”’(P) sin 7—2f’() sin *. Hence we get fcosec 2 { f 2G) sin $9 } Ab =F") +f) cot *. v=f"(b) +f (G) cot d, or »=74(F() sin 4), (10) sin p is the tangential equation of the evolute. Hence it follows that if V1, YoY, &C., denote for the successive evolutes what v denotes for the curve itself, that y, sin p= wa" sin ¢) yg sin d= aal¥ sin )s and in general v, sin 6 =( ay (V sin 4). Cy 7. From the preceding article it is easily seen that we have for the n‘” inyolute vy sind fff ap mf F(p) sin t), (12) or if we interpret syitiicis of differentiation with negative indices as denoting inte- gration, the formula (11) includes both evolutes and involutes, according 2 as 2 is regarded positive or negative. 8. From the tangential equation of a curve we get the intrinsic equation of the involute. Thus let v=F (#) be the tangential equation of the involute, then we have from equation (4) ds dp ad and from equation (12) we have F(p) =f f(o) sin $ dg sin d : o H(F@ sind) +/ (Ae) sin 4 ap) .s=fto) sin +f f (710) sn 6 aoa, or, as it may be written, = {7* (5) SAG) sin (13) = F’(g) sin*g ), sin d 460 REPORT—1878. Hence, if »=f() be the tan rential equation of a curve, the intrinsic equation of its involute is e= {(1+(35)7 }M@)sing or, since s is the length of the involute, ds do is the length of the given curve. Hence, if »v=f() be the tangential equation of a curve, the length of the curve is dd 1 , dee ae « \ #4) sin g. (14) SECTION II. PEDALS. 9. If we make the axis of y the initial line, it is evident that the polar equation the first positive pedal of the curve v=f(p) is p=f(¢) sin d. (15) Hence the tangential equation of any curve is transformed into the polar equa- tion of its first positive pedal by changing y into p and multiplying the function on the right-hand side by sin ¢. Thus the tangential equation of the parabola is y=a tan ¢. Hence its first positive pedal is p=a sin*¢ sec >. 10. The tangential equation of the evolute of v=f(¢) is v=f(p) cot p+f(p)’. Hence the polar equation of the first pedal of the evolute is = PAU sin $): (16) This also appears from equation (11). And the polar equation of the first pedal of the nt" evolute is pax (35) £0) sin > ; (17) and by supposing m negative we have the first positive pedal of the n m- volute. 11. By reversing the reasoning in art. 9 we have the following theorem :— If p=F(¢) be the polar equation of a curve, the tangential equation of its first negative pedal is _F@) sind (18) Hence the tangential equation of the first negative pedal of a conic section from any point in its plane is (a cos * + 2b sin d cos f +b sin *p)r* sin *h +2(g cos +f sin P)v sin P+ c=0, 12, The equation of the line whose envelope is the negative pedal is x sin P+y cos 6—F(d) =0. (19) Hence the negative pedal is the result of eliminating ¢ from the equations 2=($) sin b+ F'(p) cos, y=E(G) cos p— FG) sin g. v TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION A. 461 From these equations we get ; = P(g) + [Pap 13. If we substitute ah for f(p) in art. (5), equation (9), we get o= {14 (ag) SFO). Hence, if p=F(q) be the polar equation of a curve, the intrinsic equation of the evolute of its first negative pedal is a= {I + (4g) SF). In like manner, from art. (8) the intrinsic equation of the involute of its nega- tive*pedal is o= {1+ (95) } FO. PARALLEL CURVES. 14, If v = fp be the tangential equation of a curve, we have at once the tangential equation of a parallel curve at the distance & given by the equation v=fop+ k cosec . (21) This equation enables us to write out at once the equation of the reciprocal of the parallel curve, which is evidently the curve whose polar equation is “2 =f(@) ain bh, Where y is the radius of the circle of reciprocation. Thus the equation of the reciprocal of the parallel to the ellipse v= /a* + b* cot? op. rid is Ve J/ (a sin® p + 6? cos*h + k. or in Cartesian co-ordinates 4y*h? (x? + y*) = (a2) + —P (a? + y*)Prt. (22) SECTION III. Rectification of Bicircular Quartics. (15.) Being given a conic F (called the focal conic) and a circle J (called the circle of inversion), it is known that a bicircular quartic is the envelope of a variable circle whose centre moves on F, and which cuts J orthogonally. It is proved in my memoir on “ Bicircular Quartics” that there is a fourfold generation of the curve, viz., there are four focal conics, F, F’, F”, F’”, and these are con- focal, and the corresponding circles of inversion J, J’, J’, J’”, are mutually ortho- gonal, The rectification of the quarti¢ depends on the following geometrical theorem. Ina bicircular quartic there exists a series of inscribed quadrilaterals ABCD, whereof the sides AB, BC, CD, DA pass through the centres of the four circles J, J’, J”, J’”, respectively; or, as it may be expressed, the pairs of points (A, B), (B,C), (C, D), (D, A) belong respectively to the four modes of generation. Now consider the quadrilateral ABCD, and giving it an infinitesimal variation, we have four infinitesimal ares, AA’, BB’, CO’, DD’, which we shall denote by ds, ds’, ds’, ds’’’, respectively ; now let the radii of the four generating circles which touch the quartic at the four pairs of points (A, B), (B, C), (C, D), (D, A) be p, p’, - p”, p’”, respectively. - : ; re l= 462 REPORT— 1878, Again let CV, C’,V’, be two consecutive tangents to the focal conic F of the bicircular quartic, and let OAB, OA’B’, be two perpendiculars to CV, C’V’ from the centre of J. Now, if CV, C’V’ intersect the generating circle in RR’, it is evident from geometrical considerations that RR’ = 3(BB’— AA’), but RR’ = pdé (dé being the angle between two consecutive tangents to F), Hence we haye ds’ —ds=2pd0, and from the three other focal conics and circles of inversion we get three other equations, viz. :— ds’ —ds’’ = 2p’ d&’ ds” it ds'”’ — 2p” dé’ ds’ —ds =2p'"' do”. Hence we have four equations for determining any of the four quantities ds, ds’, ds’’, ds’’’, in terms of the four quantities pd6, p’d0,’ p’d6,” p’’’d6,’” each of which is separately expressible as the differential of an elliptic integral. 4. On the Eighteen Co-ordinates of a Oonie in Space. By Wo. Srortiswoope, F'.R.S., §c., §c., President. The six co-ordinates of a right line may be derived from the equations of the two planes of which it is the intersection, by eliminating each of the co-ordinates in succession, We may proceed in like manner with the equations of a conic in space. Let the equations he— (a, b,c, d, f, 9, h, 1, m, n) (x, y, 2, t)? =o. ax + By + yz+ 6t=0. Then eliminating x, y, 2, ¢,in turn, we should obtain four forms which may be written thus :— (CC, BB, FF, BF, CF, BC) (y, z,t)? =0, (AA, CC, GG, CG, AG, CA) (z, x,t)? =0, (BB, AA, HH, AH, BH, AB) (2, y, )?=0, (FF, GG, HH, GH, HF, FG) (2, y, z)? =0. The 18 quantities AA, BB, --, the values of which are easily calculated, are “ the 18 co-ordinates of a conic in space.” If we represent the three equations— AAa+ ABB + ACy=0, BAa+ BBS + BCy=0, OAa+CBB8+CCy=0, by the formula (A, B,C) (a,8, y) =9. A,B,C The 18 co-ordinates will satisfy the 12 equations— (A, H, G) (6,8, y) =0, (H,B, F) (a, 6, y) =0, (G, F,C) (a,8,8)=0. ,H, G H, B, F G,F,C Eliminating a, 8, y, 5, from these we obtain the following identical relations between the 18 co-ordinates, viz. :— 0, o, o, HH,FH, BH, GG, FG,CG, AA, BA, CA=0. HH,GH,AH, o, o, o, GF,FF,CF, BA, BB, CB. HG,GG,AG, HF,FF,BF, 0, 0, o, CA,CB,CC. HA,GA,AA, HB, FB,BB, GC,FC,CC, 0, 0, 0.. These conditions are nine in number ; and, as we are concerned only with the ratios of the co-ordinates, the total number of independent co-ordinates will be 18—9—1=8, as it should he, 2 ————— TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION A. 463 5. On the Modular Curves. By Professor H. J. S. Smirz. 6. On the Principal Screws of Inertia of a free or constrained Rigid Body. By Professor R. 8. Batt. bd @ 7. On the Applicability of Lagrange’s Equations to certain Problems of Fluid Motion. By Professor J. Pursrr. 8. On the Occurrence of Equal Roots in Lagrange’s Determinental Equation of Small Oscillations. By Freprrtck Purser, M.A. This paper is an endeavour to supply a more elementary proof of the important result which M. Somoff claims to have been the first to establish*—that the existence of equal roots in Lagrange’s determinantal equation of small oscillations does not affect the stability of the system. It is further shown that the same con- clusion holds for a certain system of differential equations of the first degree haying also a physical application. The solution of the equation of small oscillations— (ta Nose ‘ : , Sag eR aes bowel Herre mshi Gil ax, aianea ahaa 2 ibn ic deny Pier techhe ud bite &e., &e peaieel (where dy. =d,,, &e.) 99 as obtained by the method of indeterminate multipliers is— X, =2,£,0 + 7,€,%+ &e. =A, sin (VEO t+e), X= 2 £,9 + mE P+ he, =A, sin (VE t+e%), &e., &e. ‘ Where €,%, £,, &e., &,% €, &c., are the systems of values of ,, €,, &c., which satisfy the equations, (a1, + AE, + Ay& + Ke. =0, Gy € + (gq + k)E, + Ke. =0, c., &e. ‘Corresponding to the roots A”, K®, of the determinant in &. Now, by suitable transformation of this latter system it is shown that when mm roots of the determinental equation are equal, the common value being /, the cor- responding system of s involves m—1 arbitrary parameters. Hence in this case, on the one hand, m distinct integrals of the oscillation system are merged in one X=A sin (wv kt+e); on the other, this‘one, in virtue of the: m—1 arbitrary para- meters implicitly involved in its left-hand member, is equivalent to m distinct integrals, ‘f : Stiga sin (Vkt+e,) X,=A,(VWkt+e«,), ' Cc. : The occurrence of equal roots in the determinantal equation therefore only diminishes the number of distinct vibration periods, without affecting either the periodic form of solution or the number of distinct integrals. A second method is employed by the author; based on the theory of orthogonal ' “* © Sur Pgéuation algébrique 4 l'aide de laquelle on determine les oscillations tras- petites d’un systéme de points matériels,”— * Mémoires de l’Académie de St. Péters- bourg,’ vii. série, tome i, No. 14, 464 REPORT —1878. transformations, by which it is shown that the m distinct periodic integrals of the symmetric oscillation system, corresponding to m equal roots of the equation for k, can be made to appear by a series of successive reduction, while the same reduction applied to an unsymmetric system leads necessarily to terms in which ¢ occurs outside the sine or cosine. Lastly, the same general conclusions are established for the linear equations. dx “at = Ay Uy + Ay, + ew 0 e ANnXny 10 j | e as Be oa . a SS ir fb 2 wep a | | 5) ses | Bsce! : cy aata ity ers By Pe a Aes ay As » tial 2 A RI+ A+ gry Ba at 2 Ai : 2, 3 I Ba Bete) | ase a i ~ 5 By ipa > ie hay Baden el ao ot eres Bs Ee ae St 3 Bl Sec oS eke 832s Es Ta = mon Sa BS Il gaden ae Be ae 8S il al Ber | Beaek | BE £2 ge gar fo a Sigua | 8 i x 2% : £A e228 il . i) 5 s - REE S6 E 0013 ft. | 0-289 ft. |} O42 cm. | 0:28 cm 0:29 cm 0:57 cm. 0°10 in. 31°°8 259-1 39°°3 14°9 596 48°] 161°'6 07331 ft. 0:492 ft. 2.70 cm. 2°74 cm 2°74 cm 2°37 em. 1:44 in. 26°-0 195°°3 254°3 246°°3 249°°8 246°°6 100°°2 0:003 ft. 0:007 ft. 0:05 cm. 0:05 cm 0:06 cm 0:08 cm. 0-01 in. 115°6 64°°2 306° 1 259°°9 297°°7 276°°9 36°°7 0:008 ft. | 0-052 ft. | O11 cm. |] 0:09 cm 0-47 cm 0:16 cm. 0:07 in. 174°°8 B47°°7 223°°0 303°°7 12°3 83°1 268°°4 0-417 ft. 1:530 ft. 5°45 cm. 7:04 cm 5°75 cm 6°87 cm. 2°36 in. 22°8 155°4 253°°9 244°°8 2424 229°-9 94°°8 0-016 ft. 0:018 ft. 0°15 cm. 0:08 cm 0°13 cm 0°15 cm, 0:02 in. 1669-9 339°°7, 166°°3 1839°4 174°0 187°°7 207°°7 0-004 ft. 0:066 ft. 0:40 cm. 0°61 cm. 0°33 cm. 0°62 cm. 0-03 in. 295°°2 352°7 BAT°5 24°17 329°-0 3°-0 354°°5 0-236 ft. | 0-350 ft. | 2:98 cm. | 3-23 cm.| 3:67cm. | 3:29cm. | 0-41 in. 119°7 29°-2 165°'3 165°°8 191°°9 187°°6 51°9 0-124 ft. 0160 ft. 0°68 cm. 0°37 cm. 0°80 cm. 0°52 cm. 0°38 in. 21°-2 189°*4 251°4 250°°6 272°°5 267°:0 127°°3 ! 0°165 ft. |. 0-481 ft. | 1:26 cm. |. 1:68 cm 1:88 cm. | 1:85 cm..| 0:30 in. 99°°-4 13°7 129°-8 1249-2 99°-0 97° 1 7204 0-056 ft. | 0-141 ft. | 1-25 em. | 1:29 cem..| 1:25 em. | 119cm. | 0-13 in. ee} bay d 86°75 178°°6 175°8 179°4 18294 57°°9 0024 ft. | O-O60ft. | O21 cm. | 0:33 cm 0-21 cm. | 0:22 cm. | 0-25 in. 18°7 132°°8 254%] 223° 5 235°°3 274°5 11690 0°132 ft. | 0°332 ft. | 1:53cem. | 1:61cm.| 1:39cem.| 1:36cm.| 0:37 in, 31°°9 128°°3 2234 234°°3 223°-1 222°:7 116°-0 ~ 0:028 ft. 0°38 cm. |) 0:17 cm 0:19 cm 0:32.cm, | 0:08 in. 19°92 429-0 48°°8 32°°7 18°-4 58°°5 480 REPORT —1878. perceptible to ordinary observation, and nothing, therefore, has been hitherto gene- rally known regarding their character. But a first case of application of the harmonic analysis to the accurate continuous register of a self-recording tide-gauge (published in the 1876 report of the B.A. Tidal Committee) has shown for Toulon a diurnal tide amounting on an average of ordinary midsummer and mid-winter full and new moons to nearly of the semi-diurnal tides; and the present commu- nication contains the results of analysis showing a similar result for Marseilles; but, on the other hand, for Malta, a diurnal tide (similarly reckoned), amounting to only 1 of the semi-diurnal tide. The amount of semi-diurnal tide is nearly the same in 4 ie three places, being, at full and new moon, about seven inches rise and fall. The present investigation commenced in the Tidal Department of the Hydro- graphic Office, under the charge of Staff-Commander Harris, R.N., with an exami- nation and careful practical analysis of a case greatly complicated by the diurnal inequality presented by tidal observations which had been made at Freemantle, Western Australia, in 1873-74, chiefly by Staff-Commander Archdeacon, R.N., the officer in charge of the Admiralty Survey of that Colony. The results disclosed very remarkable complications, the diurnal tides predominating over the semi- diurnal tides at some seasons of month and year, and at others almost disappearing and leaving only a small semi-diurnal tide of less than a foot rise and fall. These observations were also very interesting in respect to the great differences of mean level which they showed for different times of year, so great that the low-waters in March and April were generally higher than the high-waters in September and October. The observations were afterwards, under the direction of Captain Evans and Sir William Thomson, submitted to a complete harmonic analysis, worked out by Mr. E. Roberts. Not only on account of the interesting features presented by this first case of analysis of tides of the southern hemisphere, but because the south cireumpolar ocean has been looked to, on theoretical grounds, as the origin of the tides, or of a large part of the tides, of the rest of the world, it seemed desirable to extend the investigation to other places of the southern hemisphere for which there are available data. Accordingly the records in the Hydrographic Office of tidal observations from all parts of the world were searched; but besides those of Freemantle, nothing from the southern hemisphere was found sufficiently complete for the harmonic analysis except a year’s observations of self-registering tide-gauge at Port Louis, Mauritius, and personal observations made at regular hourly, and sometimes half-hourly, intervals for about six months (May to December) of 1842, at Port Louis, Berkeley Sound, Kast Falkland, under the direction of Sir James Clark Ross. These have been subjected to complete analysis. So also have twelve months’ observations by a self-registering tide-gauge during 1871-72 at Malta, contributed by Admiral Sir A. Cooper Key, K.C.B., E.R.S. Tide-curves for two more years of Toulon (1847 and 1848), in addition to the one (1853), and for Marseilles for a twelvemonth of 1850-51, supplied by the French Hydrographic Office, have also been subjected to the harmonic analysis. These results, both for the southern hemisphere and the Mediterranean, will form the subject of a paper which Captain Evans and Sir William Thomson hope to communicate to the Royal Society in the course of the coming session. Jn the meantime the numbers resulting from the harmonic analysis are submitted without further comments to the British Association for comparison with those for other places in previous Reports of the Tidal Committee. Those of them which represent the most important of the diurnal and semi-diurnal tides are shown in the following table, which includes also for immediate comparison the results for Toulon, 1853. R in every case denotes, as in previous tables of the British Association Com- mittee, the range of the particular tidal constituent on ecther side of mean level ; so that 2R is the whole rise from lowest to highest of the individual constituent. (In comparing results with those shown in the Admiralty Tide Tables, it must be borne in mind that in the latter it is the rise above the level of ordinary low water spring tides that is given as “ heights.” TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION A. 481 e (technically called the epoch) is the angle, reckoned in degrees, which an arm revolving uniformly in the period of the particular tide has to run through till high water of this constituent, from a certain instant or era of reckoning defined for each constituent as follows :— Definition of «.*—To explain the meaning of the values of ¢ given in the following table of results, it is convenient to use Laplace’s “ astres fictifs,” or ideal stars. Let them be as follows :— M the “mean moon.” S the “mean sun.” for diurnal tide, a star whose right ascension is 90°. for semi-diurnal tide the “ first point of Aries,” or Y. O a point moving with angular velocity 2c, and having 270, of right ascension when J is in Y. Qa point moving with angular velocity 2o-w, and 270° before M in right ascension when the longitude of Mis half the longitude of the perigee. P a point moving with angular velocity, 2n having 270° of right ascension when Sis in Y. WV a point moving with angular velocity, $+ — 4, and passing alternately through the perigee and apogee of the moon’s orbit when © is in perigee. LZ a point moving with angular velocity, }¢+4w, and passing alternately through 90° on either side of the perigee of the moon’s orbit when M is in perigee. The value of e in each case above means the number of 360ths of its period which the corresponding tidal constituent has still to execute till its high-water from the instant when the ideal star crosses the meridian of the place. Thus if n denote the periodic speed of the particular tide in degrees per mean solar hour, its time of high-water is “ reckoned in mean solar hours after the transit of the ideal star. i re this definition, and in the table of results, the following notation is em- oyed : T— . T to denote the mean inclination of the moon’s orbit to the earth’s equator during the time of the series of tidal observations included in each instance. v to denote the mean right ascension of the ascending node of the moon’s orbit on the earth’s equator during the same time. y to denote the angular velocity of the earth’s rotation. 4 to denote the mean angular velocity of the moon’s revolution round the earth. 7 to denote the mean angular velocity of the earth round the sun. @ to denote the angular velocity of progression of the moon’s perigee. “Speed” means the angular velocity of an arm revolving uniformly in the period of any particular tidal constituent ; each angular velocity being reckoned in degrees per mean solar hour. 5. On the Influence of the Straits of Dover on the Tides of the British Channel and the North Sea.t By Str Witi1am THomson. * This definition for the several cases of K diurnal,and O, P,Q, and Z differs by _ 90° or 180°, or 270° from the definition given in the British Association Report (1876) for a reason obvious on inspection of Tables I. and IL, pp. 304 and 305 of that report, which (except in respect to the longitudes of perigee and perihelion) show € as previously reckoned for the several constituents. } The values of I and y are given to facilitate comparison with the equilibrium values of the several tidal constituents, according to Tables I. and IL, of the British Association Tidal Committee’s Report of 1876. ¢ See Section E., p. 639, 1878. II 482 REPORT—1878. 6. On the Sun-heat received at the several Latitudes of the Earth, taking Ac- count of the Absorption of Heat by the Atmosphere, with Conclusions as to the absolute Radiation of Earth Heat into Space, and the Minimum Duration of Geological Time. By Professor 8. Haveuton. 7. Researches made at Dunsink on the Annual Parallaz of Stars. By Professor R. §. Batu. 8. On the Precession of a Viscous Spheroid. By G. H. Darwin, M.A., Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge. L have been engaged for some time past in the investigation of the precession of a viscous spheroid, with the intention of seeing whether it would throw any light on the history of the earth in the remote past. As some very curious results have appeared in the course of the work, I propose to give an account of part of them to the British Association. The subject is, however, so complex and long, that no attempt will be made even to sketch the analytical methods employed. In a paper of mine, read before the Royal Society in May last, a theory was given of the bodily tides of viscous and imperfectly elastic spheroids; and_ this paper formed the foundation of the present investigation. For conyenience of diction, I shall speak of the tidally disturbed body as the earth, and of the disturbing bodies as the moon and sun; moreover, in all the numerical applications, the necessary data were taken from these three bodies. An analytical investigation proved that— The action of the sun and moon on the tides in the earth is such, that the obli- quity to the ecliptic and the lengths of the day and month all become variable ; the alteration in the length of the year remains, however, quite imperceptible. The effect of the internal friction called viscosity is, that the bodily tides in the earth lag, and are less in height, than they would be if the earth were formed of a perfect fluid. A general explanation was then given as to how the lagging of the tides pro- duces the effects above referred to.* And it appeared therefrom that when the viscosity is such that the bodily tides do not lag es very much, there is an increase of the obliquity to the ecliptic, a retardation of the earth’s rotation, and a retardation of the moon’s mean motion. In this general explanation it was assumed that the lagging tides were exactly the same as though the earth were perfectly fluid or elastic, and as though the tide-raising moon were more advanced in her orbit than the true moon, whilst the moon which attracts the tidal protuberances was the true moon. That is to say, it was assumed that the tides raised were exactly the same as though the earth were pea save’ that the time of high tide is late, and that the tides are reduced in height. 08 Now, although this serves in a general way to explain the phenomena which result from the supposition of the earth’s viscosity, yet it is by no means an accurate representation of the state of the case. In fact, the internal friction sifts out the whole tide-wave into its harmonic constituents; and allows the different constituents to be. very. differently affected as regards height and: phase... ery! ‘Thus the lagging:tide-wavé is not:exactly such as-the-general.explanation sup- posed, and the nearer does the .spheroid approach to absolute rigidity the greater does the discrepancy become, © © toriy ony A O eostiny-ost, { “The @eneral ‘explanation is a very fair representation for. moderate viscosities ; * See ‘Nature,’ September 26, 1878. TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION A. 483 but for large ones it is so far from correct that the tendency for the obliquity to vary may become nil; and for yet larger ones the obliquity may tend to decrease. A complete analysis of the state of things for various obliquities and viscosities shows that there is a great variety of positions of dynamical equilibrium, some of which are stable and some unstable: Although there is all this variety with respect to the change of the obliquity, yet the tidal friction always tends one way, namely, to stop the earth’s rotation. It was shown in the general explanation that the effect on the moon is a force tangential to her orbit accelerating her linear motion, and thus indirectly retarding her angular motion. But it appears that for a very great degree of stiffness, and for large inclinations of the earth’s axis to the ecliptic, this force on the moon may be actually reversed ; so that the retardation of the moon’s motion may actually be replaced by an acceleration. To a terrestrial observer, however, unconscious of the slackening of the earth’s diurnal rotation, it would be indifferent whether the moon were undergoing true retardation or true acceleration ; for in every case there would result an apparent acceleration of the moon’s mean motion. It is obvious from what has been said that we have the means of connecting the heights and lagging of the bodily tides in the earth with an apparent secular acceleration of the moon’s mean motion. I have applied these ideas to the supposi- tion that the moon has an apparent secular acceleration of 4” per century, and I find that if the earth were a homogeneous viscous spheroid, then the moon must be undergoing a secular retardation of 3/6 per century, while the earth (considered as a clock) must be losing 14 seconds in the same time. Under these circumstances, the effective rigidity of the earth must be so great that the bodily diurnal and semi- diurnal tides would be quite insensible ; the bodily fortnightly tide would, however, be so considerable that the oceanic fortnightly tide would be reduced to one-seventh of its theoretical amount on a rigid nucleus, and the time of high water would be accelerated by three days. The supposition that the earth is a nearly perfectly elastic body leads to very different results ; which, however, I must now pass over. From this and various other considerations I arrive at the conclusion that the apparent acceleration of the moon’s motion affords no datum for determining the amount of tidal friction on the earth. Sir William Thomson has made some interesting remarks about the probable age of the earth in connection with tidal friction, and he derived his estimate of the rate at which the diurnal rotation is slackening principally from the secular acceleration of the moon. He fully admitted that his data did not admit of pre- cise results; but if I am correct in the present conclusion, it certainly appears that his argument must lose part of its force. The investigation of the secular changes which such a system would undergo is surrounded by great mathematical difficulties, but I think that I have succeeded in surmounting them by methods, partly analytical.and partly arithmetical. In a communication of the present kind it would be out of place to consider the methods employed, and I will therefore only speak of some of the results. There are two standards by which we may judge of the viscosity in the present problem ; first, the ordinary one, in which it is asserted that it requires so many pounds of tangential stress to the square inch to shear an inch cube through so much in such and such a time; and secondly, when the viscosity is judged of by the amount by which the behaviour of the spheroid departs from that of a perfectly fluid one. A numerical value for this sort of measure is afforded by the angle by which the crest of the tidal spheroid precedes the moon, when the obliquity to the ecliptic is zero. ow it appears that if the earth possessed a viscosity which was not at all great, as estimated by the tidal standard, yet the materials of the earth, when considered in comparison with the substances which we, know, would be found to be a substance of very great stiffness—stiffer. than lead, and perhaps nearly as stiff asiron. I see, therefore, no adequate reason why some part of the changes, which will be considered presently, should not have taken place during geological history. The problem was solved numerically for a degree of viscosity which would make the changes proceed with nearly a maximum rapidity; estimated by the 112 484 REPORT—1878. tidal standard, this is neither a very great nor a very small viscosity, for the crest of the semi-diurnal tide precedes the moon by 17° 30’. I found, then, that if the changes in the system are tracked back for 56 million years, we find the day reduced to 6 hours 50 minutes, the obliquity to the ecliptic 9° less than at present, and the moon’s period round the earth reduced to 1 day 14 hours. This very short period for the moon indicates of course that her distance from the earth is small. As the moon goes on approaching the earth, the problem becomes much more complex; and for periods more remote than 56 million years ago, I abandoned the attempt to obtain a scale of times. The solution up +o this point shows that the times requisite for these causes to produce such startling effects are well within the time which physicists have admitted to have elapsed since the earth existed. From this point in the solution the parallel changes of the obliquity, day and month, were traced without reference to time. It appears, then (still looking backwards in time), that the obliquity will only continue to diminish a little more beyond the point already reached ; for when the month has become equal to twice the day there is no longer any tendency for the obliquity to diminish, and for yet smaller values of the month the tendency is to increase again. From this we learn that when the day is equal or less than half the month, the position of the earth’s axis at right angles to the plane of the moon’s orbit is one of dynamical stability. The whole decrease of obliquity from the present value back to the critical point, where the month is equal to twice the day, is 10°. From this point in the solution back to the initial state to which the earth and moon are tending, the obliquity to the plane of the lunar orbit was neglected. I then found that the limiting condition, beyond which it was impossible to go, was one in which the earth and moonsare rotating, fixed together as a rigid body in 5 hours and 40 minutes. This condition was also found to be one of dynamical in- stability, so that if the month had been a little shorter than the day, the moon ust have fallen into the earth; but if the month had been a little longer than the day, the moon must have receded from the earth, and have gone through the series of changes which were traced backwards up to this initial condition. This periodic time of the moon of 5 hours 40 minutes corresponds to an interval of only 6,000 miles between the moon’s centre and the earth’s surface. Moreover, if the earth had been treated as heterogeneous instead of homogeneous, this interval between the primeval earth and moon would have been yet further diminished, as also would be the common periodic time. The conclusion, therefore, appears to me almost irresistible, that if the moon and earth were ever molten viscous bodies, then they once formed parts of a common mass. With respect to the obliquity of the ecliptic, the question is one of considerable difficulty ; but on the whole I incline to the view that while a large part of the obliquity may be referred to these causes, yet that there remains an outstanding part which is not so explicable. Besides the results of which the outlines have been given, I have obtained some others which, as I believe, will aid in the formation of a modified edition of the nebular hypothesis—such as some of the changes to which an annular satellite would be subjected. One of the collateral results which appeared in considering the secular changes of such a system {as the earth, moon, and sun, was that a large amount of heat would have been generated in the interior of the earth by means of friction. If, then, it is permissible to suppose that any considerable part of these changes have taken place during geological history, Sir William Thomson’s problem of the secular cooling of the earth would require some modification. The magnitude of the undertaking has not allowed me time as yet to apply these ideas to the questions of the eccentricity and inclination of the orbit of the satellite, nor to the cases of other planets besides the earth. I think, however, that I see in Asaph Hall’s wonderful discovery of the Mar- tian Satellites a confirmation of this theory. Their extreme minuteness has, I TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION A. 485 think, preserved them as a standing memorial of the primitive period of rotation of that planet. The Uranian system, on the other hand, appears, at least at first sight, a stumbling-block. It is easy to discern in the planetary system many vere cause, which tend to change its configuration; but it is in general very hard to give any quantitative estimate of their effects. It will have been seen that, in the investigation of which I have given an im- erfect account, free scope has been given to speculation, but that speculation has een governed and directed in every case by appeal to the numerical results of a dynamical problem, and I therefore submit that it stands on a different footing from the numerous general speculations to which the nebular hypothesis has given rise. 9. On the Limits of Hypotheses regarding the Physical Properties of the Matter of the Interior of the Earth. By Professor Hunry Henyessy, F.2.S. The author pointed out that every hypothesis of a philosophical character must conform to the condition of not being in contradiction to observed facts, The known physical properties of solids, liquids, and gases were referred to, and the bearings of such properties on the problems regarding the earth’s structure were indicated. Mathematical inquiries, which started from supposing an incompressible liquid en- closed in a compressible and elastic envelope, could not lead to conclusions at all invalidating the opinion held by the author. He supported his views by deductions drawn from the observed properties of solids and liquids, and not from hypotheses of unreal and impossible properties of these substances such as formed the basis of the elaborate and. learned mathematical labours of Sir William Thomson and Mr. Darwin. The views he had long since maintained in opposition to the con- clusions of the late Mr. Hopkins regarding the earth’s solidity had been discussed in a manner satisfactory to the author in the Academy of Sciences of Paris,* when he had formally laid his views before that scientific body, and his subsequent studies had led him to maintain the correctness of his original views respecting the earth’s internal fluidity.t 10. On the Climate of the British Islands. By Protessor Henry Hennessy, F.2.S. The author laid before the Section the results of.the discussion on temperature observations made at a great many stations in Great Britain and Ireland tabulated in isothermal groups. He pointed out the lines of equal temperature over the British Isles deduced from these observations conformed to the same general law as that which he had communicated to the Association at former meetings—namely, that the isothermal lines are similar to the coast lines, and that some of the former may be even closed curves, He showed that an untrue representation of tempera- ture would be produced by introducing the artificial correction of 1° Fahrenheit for eyery 300 feet above the sea level derived from observations in balloons; and he explained that it was owing to this untenable mode of altering the results cf observations of temperature that some recent maps deviate from those he had originally produced. Among the absurd consequences of this artificial alteration of observed results, he remarked that actual temperatures were in some instances raised from 43° 6’ to 47° 3’, from 48° 3’ to 47° 1’, from 42° 2’ to 46° 6’, and from 44° 4’ to 48° 8’. A map of the distribution of plants would in these cases present a semi-alpine or semi-arctic flora in contact with isothermal lines corresponding to the flora of temperate regions. He maintained that the general law of distribu- tion of temperature in islands surrounded by warm water currents, which he had * “Remarques 4 propos d’une communication de M. Delaunay sur les résultats fournis par l’Astronomie concernant l’épaisseur de la crofite solide du globe.”— * Comptes Rendus, Inst. France,’ 1871, p. 250. + This Paper is published in ewtenso in the ‘ Philosophical Magazine ’ for Oct. 1878. 486 REPORT—1878. long since announced, had been more firmly established and consolidated by ac- cumulated observations, The paper was illustrated by maps showing the distribu- tion of isothermal lines in harmony with Professor Hennessy’s law of distribution. 11. On a new Method of maintaining the Motion of a Free Pendulum in vacuo. By Davip GILL. 12. On Space Numbers: an Extension of Arithmetic. By B. H. Huyton. In the Department of Physical Science the following Papers were read: 1. Report of the Committee for commencing Secular Experiments on the Elasticity of Wires. See Reports, p. 103. 2. A New Form of Polariscope. By Professor Wittiam Gryius Apams, M.A., FR.S. This instrument has been constructed by Mr. 8. C. Tisley, on the principle com- municated by the author to the Physical Society of London (see ‘ Proc. Phys. Soc.’ Vol. i. p. 152, and ‘Phil. Mag.,’ July 1875). ‘The advantages gained by it are— (1) an extensive field of view ; (2) an accurate means of measuring the rings and the separation of the optic axes in biaxal crystals. The polarizer is a Nicol’s prism, capable of giving a clear parallel beam of polarized light 24 inches in diameter; this beam falling on a system of lenses, is brought to a focus at the point where the crystal is placed. The beam, after passing through the crystal, is rendered parallel again by another system of lenses, and passes through a similar Nicol’s prism and another lens for focusing upon the screen. The peculiarity of the instrument consists in the arrangement of the two ceutral lenses, one on either side of the crystal. These two lenses are plano- convex—yery nearly hemispheres—-and, with their flat surfaces inwards, form the two sides of a box to hold oil or a liquid; they are so placed that their convex surfaces form portions of the same spherical surface. The crystal is placed in the box at the centre of curvature of the spherical surfaces of the two lenses. For measurement, the crystal is immersed in oil, and adjusted to its right posi- tion by a cup and socket motion; the box and the crystal with it is then turned about an axis at right angles to the direction of the axis of the beam of light, and thus, either of the optic axes of any crystal may be made to coincide with the centre of the field of view, the angle through which the box is turned being measured to minutes by means of a circle attached to it, and a vernier attached to the fixed stand supporting the instrument. A table-polariscope on the same prin- ciple has also been made by Herr Schneider, of Vienna, from the description given in the ‘ Philosophical Magazine.’ By means of these instruments, both optic axes of topaz are brought well into the field of view at the same time; and by turning the circle which carries the box any two directions in the crystal within an angle of 96° of one another can be brought into the centre of the field of view, and the angle between them accurately measured. The field of view is only limited by the in- ternal reflection at the plane surface of the lenses next to the rotating lenses. TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION A. 487 3. A New Determination of the Nwmber of Electrostatic Units in the Electro- Magnetic Unit. By W. E. Ayrton and J. Perry. Telegram and Letter to Sir W. THomson from Professor W. E. Ayrton. Tue Rep Sz, August 3. My Dzar Sir Wit11AmM,—From Singapore I sent you the following telegram on the 13th July from Professor Perry and myself. “ Kindly inform British Association that air-condenser measured magnetically and statically gives mean value ratio of these units (29°80) twenty-nine point eight nought ohms; Foucault’s velocity light.” In the autumn of this year I propose communicating a full account of this investigation to the Physical Society, or the Society of Telegraph Engineers, or otherwise as you may advise; but I thought that, as the British Association Com- mittee had for so long busied itself with the determination of electrical units, you might deem the result of this investigation of Mr. Perry and myself worthy of a preliminary notice at the meeting of the Association to be held this year at Dublin. Not being sure that I should arrive in Europe in time to reach Dublin at the com- mencement of the meeting, although I hope to be present during the last three or four days, I took the liberty of sending you the telegram quoted above. The result we have obtained for “v” is the more interesting, inasmuch as, without any bias being given to any one of our experiments, the mean value is identically the same as that obtained by M. Foucault for the velocity of light, whereas all previous determinations of the number of electrostatic units in an electromagnetic unit have led to results differing considerably from Foucault’s velocity. It appeared to Mr. Perry and myself that the method best suited for the accu- rate determination of “v” consisted in measuring the capacity of an air-condenser— 1. electromagnetically, by the swing of the needle of a ballistic galvanometer ; and 2. electrostatically, by a measurement of the linear dimensions of the condenser, since the equation connecting these capacities— s=v'8, s being the absolute electrostatic capacity, » electromagnetic capacity, leads to an equation involving only the square root of a resistance. Two difficulties of course presented themselves in this investigation— difficulties that it took us many months to overcome, labouring as we were under the disad- vantage of experimenting in a country like Japan. They were— 1. To obtain a large air condenser, of which the plates had sufficiently true surfaces that the electrostatic capacity could be accurately measured, at any rate when the plates were not nearer than half a centimetre to one another. 2. To obtain a galvanometric arrangement of sufficient sensibility to measure the small capacity of such an air condenser, and sufficiently ballistic that the air damping should be almost inappreciable. A full description of the condenser we employed (and which had a guard ring, and all the different arrangements we could think of for obtaining accurate results) will accompany the account of the investigations to which I have referred. It is sufficient here to mention that the errors arising from the surfaces of the condenser plates not being true planes were practically eliminated by capacity experiments being made with successive adjustments of the condenser-plates, a different set of oints in the upper plate being each time brought to the fixed distance from the ower plate. The arrangement of a ballistic galvanometer to fulfil the two conditions men- tioned in (2) was very troublesome. I made several astatic needles, none of which satisfied us, and we were beginning to fear my departure from Japan would necessitate the abandoning of the investigation. At last, however, an astatic * combination containing (40) forty small magnets (and of which a description will accompany the paper) gave satisfactory results, and I obtained three excellent sets of observations on June 18, June 23, and June 25, when my departure put an 488 REPORT— 1878. end to further investigation. The mean values obtained for “v” on each of these three days were: E 29:74 ohms June 18. 29:95 ,, fees 29°72 ,, 5) «20. Final mean 29:80 It will be observed that the greatest difference between any one of thé three daily means and the final mean is only about half per cent. The final number 298-0 million metres per second (and which represents the mean of ninety-eight discharges of the air condenser) may, I think, be regarded as correct to, at any rate, one per per cent., and is exactly equal to M. Foucault’s velocity of light. In the astatic combinations I employed prior to June 18 I used eight needles, and weighted the lower set of needles with pieces of brass, so as to give it a barrel shape, but the results were unsatisfactory, as there was either not sufficient deli- cacy or else too much damping. Consequently, all the numbers obtained prior to June 18 have been abandoned. On June 18 were made the first set of expe- riments with the forty-magnet astatic combination ; the idea of this arrangement being to make an approximately spherical mass of little magnets all slightly sepa- rated from one another, and all previously magnetised to saturation. As it would have been too difficult to make this entire sphere all of magnets, I finished it oft with segments cut from a little wooden sphere, But the half Napierian logarithmic decrement was 0°12095, and we thought this too high. Consequently, in the inter- val from June 18 to June 23, I took this astatic combination down and replaced the segments of the wooden sphere by segments of a small leaden hemispherical shell. * This diminished the half Napierian logarithmic decrement to 0:07825, and with a periodic time of 39°5 seconds I obtained most consistent results. But on the other hand, the close agreement of the results obtained on June 18 and on June 25, leads one to conclude that the wooden segments were quite satisfactory, and that replacing them with the leaden shell was unnecessary. The table on the accompanying sheet gives the value of the most important constants employed. The battery consisted of 382 perfectly new Daniell’s cells in series, and the galvanometer had a resistance of 20,000 ohms. All resistances were compared with a new German-silyer wire box, recently received from Messrs. Elliott, London. Determination of the Number of Electrostatic Units in an Electromagnetic one. a) b oO: o B= oSleta8E845| 2s les 2s] 3. wo EGG | OO ga| 8 Se | ES Date (9°, Beis 328) 89-28) 33 m2 S| os Remarks ga 2S) bss ne ae 5 2 "a Sig © aw =I BIAS Saal -s 8 ea 2] -x o o Egg Sines = Be ac 3 RA Ss Ss June 18} 1324-96} 1:024 215 | 25:3 |0:12095 | 29:74] ( Ninety-eight ei = : : Here discharges of » 23] 1323:14| 0:7728 34 39°5 | 0-07825 | 2995/4 the six con- » 25] 182314) 0:7728 34 42:2 | 0-:081865) 29-72 | | denser June 18. The lower set of needles was weighted with segments cut from a small wooden sphere. June 23 and after. The lower set of needles was weighted with segments cut from a small leaden spherical shell. Number of magnets in astatic combination, 40, Number of new Daniell’s cells in series, 382. * The distance between the upper condenser plate and the guard ring was slightly increased by diminishing the size of the plate to avoid the possibility of loss of electricity. TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION A. 489 The values obtained for “v” are (as far as I am aware) up to the present time as follows :— MM. Weber and Kolraush . 3 : : . 31:074 ohms, Sir W. Thomson : ‘ c 7 : . 28:2 rf Professor CO. Maxwell . : : : : . 288 Professors Ayrton and Perry. ; , © 129:80)79))5; Velocity of light—M. Foucault . : C 29°8 e During the last twelve months we have been hard at work with thedetermination of the electromotive force of contact of metals and liquids, using a new apparatus. Some of the results are, we venture to think, most interesting; for instance, the electromotive force of contact of hot and cold mercury, no other conductors being in contact with either mercury ; the electromotive force of contact of a cold metal and hot mercury, no third conductor being in contact with either, &c., &c. The deter- mination of the electromotive force of contact of the pairs of constituents of Mr. Latimer Clark’s constant mercurous sulphate cell was most laborious, and occu- pied me weeks, in consequence of the difference of potential that exists between the body of the mercurous sulphate paste and the layer of water that floats on the surface. However, a forlorn hope kept me hard at it, and I am glad to say at last I was successful in getting good results. We have gone over all the old ground that furnished the basis of our former paper, as well as much new ground. Believe me to remain, dear Sir William, sincerely yours, Professor Sir William Thomson, F.R.S., &e. W. E. Ayrron. It has been decided that the full account of the above determination of ‘v” shall be given to the Society of Telegraph Engineers during the winter 1878-79. 4, On Apparatus employed in Researches on Crookes’s Force. By Ricuarp J. Moss, F.C.8. The author exhibited and described the apparatus which had been employed by himself and Mr. G. J. Stoney, F.R.S., in their researches on Crookes’s Force. Early in 1876 they devised a means of ascertaining the existence of a reaction between the blackened vanes of a radiometer and the sides of the surrounding glass envelope. A flat piece of elder-pith with one side blackened was attached by one end to the inner surface of a small flask. A light glass arm suspended in the flask from a silk fibre carried a disk of thin microscope glass which could be brought opposite the blackened pith, and within a millimetre or two of it. When the flask was exhausted it was observed that the pith when illuminated repelled the glass disk, even when the tension of the residual air was equal to 7 m.m. of mercury. Having obtained this result, another apparatus was constructed, with the view of obtaining comparative measurements of the force at various tensions with a given distance between the glass and the pith; and at various distances with a given tension of the residual gas. This apparatus is figured and described in the ‘ Proceed- ings of the Royal Society, 1877, p. 553. It was found that in an atmosphere of hydrogen a Crookes’s force was manifested at a distance of even 10 m.m., when the tension of the residual gas was as much as 5m.m. of mercury. Within certain limits the force was found to vary about inversely as the tension; and at a given tension the variations produced by alterations in the distance between the pith and the glass were nearly inversely as the distance until it exceeded 20 m.m. (half the diameter of the containing tube), when the force remained almost constant, even at a distance of 100 m,m., the maximum of which the apparatus admitted. 5. On Spheroidal Drops. By Ricnarp J. Moss, F.C.S. According to Mr. G. J. Stoney’s recently published theory of the spheroidal state, the drops are supported by:the pressure which is exerted between hot and cold surfaces when they are within a certain distance from one another, depending on the 490 REPORT— 1 878. length of the free path of the molecules enclosed between the surfaces, and on the difference of temperature of the latter. By duly observing the conditions of this theory it was found possible to support a spheroid of ether on a surface of the same liquid for upwards of an hourand a half. The author has shown * that the supporting layer of gas need not necessarily consist of the vapour of the spheroid, or of the liquid upon which it floats; since melted paraffin, which showed no diminution in weight even when heated for an hour zn vacuo at the temperature of boiling water, readily yields spheroids at ordinary atmospheric tensions when its temperature is 80-90° C. Ifthe drops are kept cool by means of a gentle current of air, they continue to float for a considerable time. 6. On the Spherical Class-Oubie with Three Single Foci. By Henry M. Jerrery, M.A.* i. Let the three foci A, B, C be a quadrant apart, so that the triangle of re- ference (ABC) is tri-rectangular. 7 A group of class-cubics thus constituted may be thus denoted by line co- ordinates :— 2 dpqr + (ap+Bqryr) (p? +9? +7") =0, where d is the parameter of the group, (a, 8, y) the satellite-point. 2. When there are inflexional cubics in the group, the locus of the satellite- point may be thus found, by equating the inyariants to zero. S= { @-(+e+y) }*—12da8y=0, r 3 3 = {P= (+ B+y?) } + 00daBy — 54eP (8°? + 77a" + 028?) + 18daBy (a? + B? + y*) =0. The eliminant of d is found to be of the eighteenth degree :— PHY (a? +B? ab y’) (By? + ya? + a?B*)* — 12x 81a*B"y? ( Py? + ya” + a?) a 8 x (27)?(a? + B? + y’)*(B°y? + y’a" oh aR”) ?a?p? 2 —112 x 17 x 27(a? + B? + y*) (84? + y*a? + a®B?)a*Bty* + 16 x (27)?(a? + B? + y*)8atBty* +16 x (17)%a®A*y° = 0. If this equation be arranged according to the powers of a, its highest term is (27)?(B®—y*)fal +... The curve has four loops at each of its three foci and their antipodes, at which the tangents intersect at right angles. It is petal-shaped, like the Rhodonew of Abbate Guido Grandi. (Gregory’s ‘ Examples of the Diff. and Int. Calc.,’ fig. 49.) 3. There are seven critic lines at the most. For a critic value, s'~(Z) =o. This function will be found to be of the seventh degree in the parameter (d). The theorem may be also thus established. By partial differentiation with respect to the variables (p, q, r), a (p? +9? +77) + 2p(ap + Bg + yr) + 2dgr =o. B(p?+ @ +7?) + 29q(ap + Bq + yr) + 2dpr =o. y (p? + 9? +77) + 2r(ap + Bq + yr) + 2dpq =o. Hence the critic lines are determined symmetrically by cubics with collinear foci (p, g, ap—Bq). ap RP ae —pP+err p-Prr p+e—r * «Proceedings of Royal Dublin Society,’ vol. i. (new series), p. 87. TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION A. 49] \ Their common tangents are seven by a well-known theorem (Salmon’s ‘ Higher Algebra,’ Art, 248.) : 4, A moveable point (P) lies on AD, arcs (or im plano, right lines) connect P with two other points B, C : the envelope of the bisector of the angle BPC is one . of the preceding eubics. Similarly, the bisectors of the angles AQC, BRA, if Q,R move on BD, CD, envelope the other cubics, which determine the critic lines by their mutual combination. This is an extension of a theorem of Pliicker. 5. In the most general case, where ABC may have any position on the sphere, the critic lines are thus determined :— ap fe Bg (Yee Pe teres —apP +bgQ+cerR” apP—bgQ+erR apP + bgQ— erR’ where P=ap—bg cos C —er cos B, and Q, R have similar values. But the equation and form of the locus of the satellite, when there are inflexional values in the group of class-cubics, is not here determined. 6. By reciprocating, the critic centres of a group of spherical order-cubics are determined to be seven by the intersecting cubics— ee ee 6V —2aa (aa+ 68 cosc+cycosl) In plano, as is well known, these degenerate into three critic centres, formed by the intersection of three hyperbole. For then cos a=cos b=cos c=1: 6V =3(a?a? + 2beBy cos a) =4 A?*, and the cubics become hyperbole : pa Qui © “ta ry 5° —aat+bB+cy aa—bB+cy aat+bB—cy ee 2 ee SS ee ee ee 7. On a Cubic Surface referred to a Pentad of Co-tangential Points, By Henry M. Jerrury, M.A. 1. A cubic surface may be generated as the locus of the foci in involution of all the transversals, concurrent in a fixed point, which meet a system of quadrics or conicoids, intersecting in a quadro-quadric curve. This is an extension of Cremona’s method of generating plane cubics to solid geometry. Dr. Salmon’s process leads to the same analytical expression. In such a system of conicoids, the locus of the conic curves of contact of enveloping cones, with a common vertex, is a cubic surface. 2. All the pole planes of the fixed point, with respect to the conicoids, intersect in a straight line PQ, which is one of the 27 lines on the cubic. If the system of conicoids be referred to their self-conjugate tetrahedron, and if the fixed point be E, the centre of the inscribed sphere (1,1,1,1), the five triple tangent-planes through PQ touch the cubic in the four vertices of the tetrahedron and in E the centre. Consider any pair of lines, as AP, AQ, forming a triangle APQ with PQ. Then, beside the original plane APQ through each of the lines AP, AQ, four more triple tangent planes can be drawn: in all nine such planes. The same is true of the planes through the pairs of lines at B,C,D,E, which constitute with PQ triple tangent planes. Thus the 45 planes are exhibited. Again, besides the line PQ and the five pairs of intersecting lines, which meet PQ in ten points, there are 16 lines, which may be determined in five different ways. Four of the five triple tangents through each of the lines AP, AQ (exclusive of the common plane APQ), deter- mine 8 lines each, the number required. The same process may be used with the same results, if the triple planes through the lines intersecting in B,C,D,E be used. The arrangement of these planes and lines, whose discovery by Professors Cayley and Salmon constituted an epoch in Solid Geometry, may be compared for simplicity with Professor Schifli’s double-sixers, and Dr. Hart’s cubical system of grouping. 8. The analogues to Maclaurin’s theorem on tetrads do not present themselves. But points on the cubic may be thus multiplied. Transvyersals through a fixed point P on the cubic pass through the vertices A,B,C,D,E, which constitute the pentad of co-tangential points, and intersect the 492 REPORT—1878. surface in A’,B’,C’,D’,H’. If these five points be joined with the former five in pairs, the points of intersection lie on the curve and are four, Q,R,S,T ; and six other points are constituted on the curve by the intersections of AB’, A’B; AO’, A’C; AD’, A’D; BO’, B’C; BD’, B’D: and CD’, O’D. Call these six points (a,b), (a,c), (a,d), (,c), (0,4), (¢,d). . t i It will be. found that these 21 points lie on 40 chords, viz., A,B,O,D,E on 8 chords each, and the other 16 points on 5 chords each, according to the following table :— P,A,A’|Q,A,E’ |R,A,(c,d)|8,A,(8,d) | T,A,(0,c) )BY.A,(a,6) | C,A,(a,c) | D',A,(a,d) PBB |Q@B(cd)|R,BE’ |S,B,(a,d)|T-B(ac)|C"B.(b,c) |A',B,(a,o) |D"B,(3.d) ? > ( J P.C,0' |Q,0,(2,d)| B,C,(a,d)|S,C,E" | |'T,0,(a,b)| D/,C,e,d) | BYC(a,c) | A°C.(a,c) P'D,D'|Q,D,(3,c)| R,D,(ae) |S,D, (a,b) |T-D,E’ | BD(d,d) | A"D,(a,d) | C"D,(c,d) PEE |QEA’ |REB |SEC’ |T.ED' |(a,6),E,(c,4)| (ae), E,(bd) |(b,c),E,(a,d) 4, Let the quadro-quadric curve be denoted by the equations to two conicoids of the system :— La? + m,B? + ny? + 7,8° =0. 1,a? + m8? + Nyy? + 7,6? =0., Let the equation to a transversal through a fixed point (f,g,h,k) be :— af _ eet! BAe PIL vid 6-k _ R r p v p } For the segments of its distances from the conicoids :— 1,(f+AR)? + m,(g + pR)? + 2, (A + vR)? +7,(K + pR)?=0=U. L,(f+AR)?+m,(9 + wR)? +2, (1+ vR), +7,(k + pR)*=0= V. The following equation denotes the foci of these lines in involution: if Ht be AG: written for R, and finally o =1. dU dV # dU dV _ dR ‘de do ' dk This function yields on development : 3(hm,~lym,) Ay—nf) (f+XR) (g +R) =o. Or, 3(1,m, —1,m,). (ag—Bf) aB=o. . This may be reduced to the form— (J,a? + m,B? + ny? + 7,8?) (1,aft+ mBg + nyh +7,0h). = (d,a* + m,B? + Nyy? +7.87) (laf + m,Bg + nyyh + 7,8k). The dual of this theorem (§ 1) may be noted. If a system of conicoids be inscribed in a quadro-quadric torse, and if from each line of a fixed plane tangent planes are drawn to the conicoids, the envelop of the focal planes in involution of the system is a cubic class-surface. 5. The above equation may be obtained as the eliminant of a conicoid of the system, and the pole-plane of a fixed point. (J, —N,)a? + (mm, —Am,)B* + (nm, — Any) y? + (7", —A7_) B= 0. =(1, Al, af =o. This is Dr. Salmon’s method (§1), which seems capable of generating surfaces of any order or class from a surface of the next lower order or class. G6. In this investigation, f=g=h=k or E is the fixed point, without loss of generality. Professor Cayley’s notation is adopted for the minors of the determinant :— Thus 12 denotes pm] “ap pone ee 29 Ma The following relation subsists between the minors, as has been pointed out. (‘Quarterly Journal of Mathematics,’ vol. xv.) 23.41 + 31.42 + 12.48 = o, 0. D1, My, yy 7" In) Mgy Nyy Ty a TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION A. 493 It will be convenient to denote by a, }, c, d, the sums of certain minors : a=12 4138414: 6=21+4+23+4 24. e=814+382+4+34: d=41+42+45. Then it will be seen that at O64 e+ . d=o0. : 23a + 3164+ 12c =6. 340 + 42¢ + 23d =0. d4a + 41¢+13d=o0. 94a +41b +12d=o. Hence the cubic under discussion may be written : 23By (B—y) + 8lya (y—a) + 1248 (a—8) + 41ad (5 —a) + 4288 (6 —f) + B4y8 (y—8) =0. 7. The equations to the tangent planes at the vertices of the tetrahedron and at E the centre, which constitute a pentad of points, are— 128+ 13y +148 =0. Qia Q3y + 2465 =0. 3la + 328 + 345=0. 41a +428 + 43y =0 aa+ D8 +cy + dd=0. These are fine triple tangent planes; and any two determine the line PQ on the eubic, through which they are drawn. 8. The equations to the pole-conicoids of the points of the pentad are— 128? + 13y? + 148? — 2a(128 + 15y + 128) =0. 21a? + 23y? + 246? — 28(21a + 23y + 246) =o. 31a? + 328? + 346° — 2y(3la + 328 + 346) =o. Ala? + 428? + 43? —26(41a + 42a + 43y) =o. aa®+ 0B?+ cy?+ dd =0. The four cones (128? + 12y? + 128? =o) and the like, belong to the same quadro- quadric, and the fifth pole-conicoid is a hyperboloid of one sheet whose asymptotic cone is inscribed in an orthogonal trihedral angle. 8. To determine the ten lines on the cubic which intersect in PQ. The two lines AP, AQ, are obtained by the intersection of the tangent-plane and cone 128 +13y +146 =o. 128? + 13y? + 146? =o. Their equations are— ah ed Naropa neh oe ie ey Biy: 814455 : Mt : —(12+18), if =o w+: 12.18. 14 (12+184+14) =0. Similar equations denote the other four pairs of lines. 9. To determine the eight triple tangent planes, four through AP, and four through AQ, other than PAQ; and the sixteen lines on the surface, eight of which intersect in AP, and eight in AQ, other than PQ and AQ or AP respectively. Write gh: hi:l44%:14F: - : rite g +5 +75 (12 + 18) so that (A8—gy =o) denotes the plane APD or AQD. Then, if p denote a para- meter, the equation B(12 + ph) +y (18—pg) + 146=0 denotes any plane through AP or AQ. For brevity, write the coefficients at = p: a 95 the equation becomes pB+qy+8=0. 494 REPORT—1878. Let this equation be combined with that to the cubic (§ 6.) B’y (23 + 42q + 43p? + 2. 42nq) + By?( — 23 + 48p? + 429? + 2. 439) + ya (31 + 419?) + ya?(—381 4 419) + a°8(12 + 41p + aB? (—12 + 41p?) + 2aBy . 41pq + B°42(p* + p) + y° 43(9? + 9) =0. After rejecting the known factor 84 —vg, the conic of intersection is thus denoted. ee Fa (gp +p) = x 43(q? +9) + SP (-12+41p") ~27(81 +41q? [Be Se ae) =o. 7 OL Ten) + By aa ot a This may assume the more tractable form :— B(,2,12 ey ee 13 } (41a + 498 + 43y) { (p +7) “(4 +) P (41a? + 426? + 43,7). +P (41a? + 426? + 37’) This ternary quadric may be resolved into linear factors if ee {2p é ni 12149? + nN g = (41 +42 +43) {3 4p? a 12+ Fag +13y°} where 14p =12 + ph, 14g =13-— pg. This quartic yields four values of the parameter p, so that the equations are determined to eight triple tangent planes through A, since g,/ have each two values dependent on the values of w. The two preceding linear factors denote the traces on the co-ordinate plane ABC, or rather the planes through D and those traces of a pair of lines which intersect in AP or AQ. The four values of p yield sixteen in all—eight which meet in AP, and eight in AQ. To complete the investigation of the equations to the lines on the cubic, it would be necessary to combine another form of a tangent plane :— 128 + y (18 + ph) +6 (14 + ph) =0. By proceeding as above, the rejection of the known factor ky + 8, leads to“the conic of intersection :— dint s2uy{2(o4 38438) i i (210? + 23? +248?) =o, 13+ pk. ,_14+ph 12 ace 12, 3 If this quadric be resoluble into linear factors 23.24{ 2p +7 (1247 +138) +7 (1202414)? = (21423424) {2 (1202+ 14)’ +70 (1242418). where for brevity » = The actual solutions of these quartics has not been attempted, since the auxi- liary cubic is cumbrous; although we may infer from the circumstance, that the same sixteen lines may be determined indifferently from A, B, C, D, or E, that the expressions would be explicit. This quartic yields four values of p, which substi- tuted in the preceding quadric, determine the projections on the co-ordinate plane ACD of four pairs of lines on the cubic which intersect in AP and four pairs . TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION A. 495 which meet in AQ. The equations to these traces, combined with the equations of the former traces on ABC, completely determine the lines. 10. The theorem of § 3 may be thus proved. Let (f,9,4,%) denote P in the preceding tetrahedral system ; then A’,B’,C’,D’,E’ have for their co-ordinates (F,g,4,k), (f,G,2,4,), (f9,HL4), (fig,2,K): where Ke pn 12g? +130? + 1402 = — A= ee eer Ot o— +h Rien ag cri Then the coordinates of Q,R,S,T have this type: (f,G,H,K), (F,g,H,K), (F,G,2,K), (7,G,H,/) ; and the points (a,b), (a,c) ... have the type (F,G,2,4), (F,g,H,A)......... With these data the theorem is as readily established, as its Plane analogue. * Quarterly Journal of Mathematics,’ vol. xv. p. 203. 8. A New Form of Trap-Door Electrometer. By Professor Barrerr.* 9. On Unilateral Conductivity in Tourmaline Crystals. By Professor Sirvanus P. THompson and Dr, Outver J. Lopas. The authors regarded the phenomena of pyroelectricity as exhibited by the tourmaline and other crystals as of the utmost significance in the theory of the relation of electricity to the particles of matter. Dr. Lodge had read a paper at the British Association Meeting at Glasgow on a mechanical model illustrating the flow of an electric current through a circuit of molecules. (See Phil. Mag., Nov. and Dec. supp. 1876.) The considerations therein advanced had led the authors independently to con- clude that the phenomena of pyroelectricity could be explained if it could be shown that such crystals as were pyroelectric possessed wnzlateral conductivity (§ 25 of above paper). The term “unilateral conductivity” had been given by Dr. A. Schuster to a phenomenon of some obscurity observed by him in certain cases, and which formed the subject of a communication to a former meeting of the Asso- ciation. The term “unilateral conductivity ” was defined as follows :—If the con- ductivity of a substance in a given direction between two points A and B was greater when the flow was in the direction from A to B than when the flow was in the direction from B to A, then such a substance was said to possess unilateral conductivity. It had been argued by the first-named of the authors of the paper that if the tourmaline possessed a unilateral conductivity for electricity, it would also be found to possess unilateral conductivity for heat, since the researches of Tait and Kohlrausch had shown that the two conductivities are comparable in almost all points of analogy. The experimental research, therefore, had divided itself into two branches—a thermal and an electrical. Owing to the difficulty of procuring suitable specimens of tourmaline crystal a delay of some months occurred, but eventually this difficulty was overcome through the kindness of Professor N. Story Maskelyne. Other crystals had also been procured from France, The method first suggested for comparing the two heat-conductivities as measured in opposite directions along the axis of the crystal was that of De Senarmont. A slice of the crystal was cut with parallel faces containing the crystallographic axis, and having been covered with a film of wax, or with Meusel’s double ‘iodide of copper and mercury, was heated from a point by a hot wire. When the experiment was rapidly made, the elliptical isothermal, line marked out by the melted wax or the blackened iodide, was found to be displaced from the * A Model was exhibited. 496 REPORT—1878. centre, and this displacement was towards the-analogous-pole ; showing that while the temperature was rising, the conductivity in that direction was greater than in the opposite direction. When, however, the experiment was done slowly with a thicker crystal, so that thermal equilibrium was gradually attained, no such unilateral effect could be observed. Rough preliminary experiments showed the unequal semi-axes minor to have a ratio of about 10 to 12, but there was con- siderable discordance between the various results. A calorimetric method was next adopted to measure the flow of heat across a thin wall of tourmaline cut normally to its crystallographic axis. The thin slice was fixed between two similar portions of glass tubing, either end of which could therefore be made to hold a weighed quantity of mercury whilst steam was blown up into the other. In this way the heat which passed upwards through the crystal when one surface was maintained at 100° could be measured in either direction. Experiments were made alternately, the times required to heat the mercury through a given range of temperature being compared in the two cases. To eliminate error, after half the experiments had been made the crystal slice was itself reversed between the glass tubes. The results, which exhibited as fair agreement with one another as could be expected, showed, as before, that the con- ductivity for heat was greater towards the analogous pole so long as the temperature of the crystal was rising. In respect of the electrical conductivity, time had only permitted a few preli- minary experiments. The slice of crystal was heated in a steam bath. A five microfarad condenser was charged through the crystal for one minute with 10 or 12 Daniell’s cells, and the condenser was then discharged through a sensitive Thomson galvanometer of 7000 ohms resistance. The limit of the very slight swing was accurately observed, and then the operation was repeated with the tourmaline electrically reversed. ‘This was repeated alternately. When the temperature was rising a difference between the two swings was perceived; also when the tempera- ture was falling there was a difference in the other direction. But these must have been chiefly due to the electromotive force, so-called, of the crystal. When the temperature was steady not the slightest difference could be perceived. The authors would wish, before being satisfied with this result, to heat the tourmaline to higher temperatures, and to try a much higher electromotive foree—say that of 1000 cells, 10. On Gaussin’s Warning regarding the Sluggishness of Ships’ Magnetism. By Sir Wi1uram THomson, F.R.S. (Practical Rule and Caution.) 1. After steering for some time on westerly courses, expect 1 (a) westerly error if you turn to the north, 1 (4) or easterly error if you turn to the south. _ 2. After steering for some time on easterly courses, expect 2 (a) easterly error if you turn to the north, or 2 (6) westerly error if you turn to the south. The diagram representing case 1 (@) illustrates the physical explanation: N.and 8. representing the north and south points of the compass card (or “ true south” and “true north” poles of its s needles), and the small letters s, s, s, true southern polarity, and n, n,n, true northern polarity, induced in the port and starboard ends of deck beams, and port and starboard sides of ship, while S steering east, and remaining for some time after she has been turned to north. In the Admiralty ‘ Compass Manual,’ Gaussin’s warning is given with reference to the direction of swinging, in correcting the com- pass by magnets, according to Airy’s first method. In the Reports of the Liverpool Compass Committee, and in Mr. Towson’s ‘Information for Masters and Mates regarding Ships’ Magnetism,’ instances of perplexing changes in the compass are given, and are referred to the same cause. The “sluggishness” of ships’ magnetism, en arr TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION A. 497 according to which it depends generally in part on the influence experienced some time before the time of observation, and not wholly on the influence at the time, seems to have heen first definitely noticed and discussed scientifically by Sir Edward Sabine, in his analysis of the results of the magnetic observations in the Antarctic exploring expedition of Sir James Ross, in the Erebus and Terror, in the years 1839-43. The practical rule and caution given above is of great importance in the navi- gation of iron ships. The amount of the error which may be found cannot be pre- dicted for ships in general, nor for any particular ship, except after much experience and careful observation. A small effect of two or three degrees,* such as that referred to in the Admiralty Manual as found in M. Gaussin’s experience, may be observed in the course of quietly swinging a ship by hawsers or steam tugs. If the ship under weigh is steamed round on the different courses, the amount of the “ Gaussin error” may generally be greater than if she is hauled round by Warps ; but we must not be sure that it will be so, because the shake of the screw, which enhances the magnetization on the east or west courses, may shake it out again be- fore the observation is made on the north or south courses. A good practical rule in correcting the compass is, after having got it quite correct on the north and south course, correct just half the error which is found after that on the south or north course in the regular swinging of the ship. The warning at the head of this article is particularly important for ships of war after firing guns when on easterly or westerly courses, if the course is then changed to north or south, and particularly if after the firing the change of course is effected under canvas, without the shaking of the ship’s magnetism produced by the engines and screw. The warning is also very important for ships steaming through the Mediter- ranean eastwards or westwards, and then turning south, through the Suez Canal, or north round Cape St. Vincent ; and for ships steaming eastward from America, and then turning northwards or southwards into St. George’s Channel. 11. On the Electrical Properties of Bees’ Wax and Lead Chloride. By Professors J. Perry and W. EH. Ayrton. Professor Ayrton commenced by noting the close way in which investigations in the various branches of physical science were linked one with another, and by remarking that experiments on electric absorption ought to have no less interest for the scientific engineer than those on the increasing strain of materials under con- stant mechanical stress had for the electrician. He next explained how, in conse- quence of the absorbed charge in water being immeasurably greater than the surface charge, the direct method of determining experimentally the specific induc- tive capacity employed by Mr. Perry and himself, in their experiments on ‘Ice as an Electrolyte, failed to give the result equal to the square of the index of refrac- tion for light of infinitely long waves, and he suggested that the method recently employed by Mr. Gordon for measuring the specific inductive capacity of solids with very rapidly reversed charges might possibly, if applied to water, give an answer approximately more equal to the square of the index of refraction ; how- ever, he was inclined to think that, since Mr. Gordon’s method for solids gave (after the application of the proper correcting factor for the thickness of the dielectric) numbers closely agreeing with the received specific inductive capacities, there existed no known method for correctly ascertaining the electric capacity of a liquid. 2 : For although a condenser might be made of opposed metallic plates separated by a space almost entirely filled with a liquid dielectric, which did not, however, touch either plate, and although, according to the ordinary nomenclature, the two _ plates in such an arrangement would be said to be insulated from the water and * Much greater effects than this are actually found in the cases of gun practice, _ and of long steaming on easterly or westerly courses referred to below. 1878! KK 498 REPORT—1878. from one another, still, as explained in their paper on the ‘ Viscosity of Dielectrics, a succession of rapidly reversed charges would be accompanied by true electric conduction; in fact, that it would be well worthy of consideration whether the explanation of the result which Mr. Gordon had brought to their notice at this meeting, viz., that his new method of measuring specific inductive capacity of solid dielectrics had given the old results, might not be found to consist in this conduction —this viscous conduction he might term it, although in reality there was but one kind of conduction, the conversion of electric energy into heat—for this conduction would occur unequally in the two apparently balanced condensers, since the two dielectrics varied in: viscosity, consequently the balance of capacities was not a real one. Nevertheless Professor Ayrton thought it highly important that careful experi- ments should be made, both with constant and with rapidly reversed charges, on the inductive phenomena observed in such a water condenser as he had described. The abnormal rise in the specific inductive capacity of bees’ wax, on solidifying, which the experiments of Professor Perry and himself had shown, coincided with an increase in the index of refraction; he regarded this as furnishing an important addition to the experimental proof of Professor Clerk Maxwell’s electro-magnetic theory of light, and he hoped that some of those philosophers of Trinity College, Dublin, who had so successfully turned their attention to the elucidation of the molecular vibrations causing Crookes’s force, would give their views on the molecular vibrations accompanying wave motion and electric induction. He thought that the experiments described in the paper on bees’ wax and lead chloride showed, in a sufficiently satisfactory way, that, where the resistance of an electrolyte diminished by electrification, it was due to the electromotive force employed being sufficiently great to decompose the damp in the pores of the elec- trolyte; but, in view of the fact that the resistance of water itself increased by electrification, it seemed to follow that the products of the decomposition of the damp must act chemically on the solid electrolyte and cause deterioration, and hence a smaller specific resistance. But if there were deterioration we should expect that the specific resistance of the material would steadily diminish day by day, a result that was not obtained in the experiments of Professor Perry and himself, on bees’ wax at any rate, as will be seen on examining the table given in their paper in the ‘ Philosophical Magazine’for August. He therefore concluded that further experiments on electrolytes, in which resistance diminishes by electri- fication, were necessary to make the explanation quite complete. 12. Theory of Voltaic Action.* By J. Brown. The author described some experiments made with a Volta’s condenser haying plates of iron and copper, and with a ring half of copper and half iron, which show that the difference of electric potential of these metals when in contact depends on the atmosphere surrounding them. While in the ordinary atmosphere iron is positive to copper, in an atmosphere of hydrogen sulphide copper is positive to iron. These effects are explained by the chemical theory of electricity, as due in the first-mentioned case to the superior chemical affinity of the iron for the oxygen of the watery vapour, and other oxygen compounds present in the air; in the second, to the greater affinity of the copper for the sulphur of the hydrogen sulphide. 13. Mutual Action of Vortex Atoms and Ultramundane Oorpuseles. By Professor G. Forzgs. It is well known that amongst the numerous theories which have dealt with the form of an atom, there is only one which is in accordance with the properties * A description of the experiments is given in the ‘ Phil. Mag.,’ August, 1878. TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION A. 499 which we know atoms to possess. It was originated by Sir William Thomson, whose conclusions, based on the reasearches of Helmholtz on fluid motion, may be briefly summarised. According to this view the whole of space is filled with a frictionless fluid, and material atoms are portions of this fluid, having a species of rotational motion, which, as Helmholtz proved, must continue for ever. ‘The best analogy to this universal plenum and to these vortex atoms is the behaviour in an atmosphere of “ smoke-rings,” such as may be blown from the mouth of the smoker of tobacco, from the funnel of a locomotive, or from the mouth of a cannon. Such smoke-rings have remarkable properties, which are due, not to the smoke, which merely renders them visible, but to their internal motions. Such “vortex rings” can travel with great rapidity. They can vibrate, they can rebound from each other with perfect elasticity, and, supposing that such action takes place in a frictionless fluid, they would be no less indestructible than un- creatable by mechanical means, It is also well known that Le Sage of Geneva conceived a kinetic theory of gravi- tation, which has been adopted by Sir William Thomson. According to Le Sage, the whole of space is filled with small particles, which he calls ultramundane corpuscles, flying with enormous velocity through every point of space in every direction. These penetrate even the void spaces between atoms, so that of those which shower upon the earth perhaps not more than 1 in 10,000 have their velocity diminished by collision. The others pass right through the earth. Owing to these collisions, however, a smaller number of ultramundane corpuscles are to be found moving in the direction from the earth than towards it. Thus the earth acts as a shield, protecting surrounding bodies from the shower of ultramundane corpuscles in that direction.» Hence the moon, and bodies on the earth’s surface, are battered by ultra- © mundane corpuscles most in the direction towards the earth. This force, driving bodies towards the earth, explains terrestrial gravitation. Similarly, all bodies are driven towards each other with a force varying as the product of the masses. Sir William Thomson supposes ultramundane corpuscles to be vortex rings with no hole in the centre and elongated, like a serpent rushing forwards and always turning inside out, spitting its inwards out at its mouth, and absorbing its skin at the other end. Collisions with vortex atoms would not result in a destruction of velocity and consequent enormous generation of heat, but energy of translation is con- verted into some other form of energy, perhaps energy of vibration. However artificial these hypotheses may appear at first sight, the more they are studied the more satisfactory are they. They are the only suggestions of the kind which are in any way tenable, and they serve at least the part of working hypotheses. Some remarkable and unforeseen consequences follow from the co- existence of such vortex atoms and ultramundane corpuscles as Thomson has con- ceived. The following facts seem to follow from the laws of hydro-linetics :— 1. When a body is heated, and the vortex atoms are rushing about, their mutual collisions originate vibrations in themselves which, when they are free, have a definite period, or periods, depending upon the nature of each vortex atom. 2. When an ultramundane corpuscle passes such a vibrating atom, the succes- sive approaches and recessions of the atom to and from the corpuscle impress upon that corpuscle a waye-form whose dimensions depend partly on the velocity of the corpuscle, partly on the vibrations of the atom. 3. When a corpuscle so stamped continues its progress through the frictionless fluid before mentioned, the position of the wave-marks remain fixed relatively to the corpuscles, without being affected by its internal motions. 4. If such a marked corpuscle in its flight passes the neighbourhood of a cold atom, ¢.e., one which is not vibrating, and if that atom be capable of vibrating in -the same period as the original atom which impressed the wave-trace, then the wave-trace on the corpuscle will, on same manner as the original atom. : The phonograph supplies a happy illustration of these processes :— 1. When the membrane, with needle attached, is vibrating we have the analogue of a hot atom, passing the atom, cause it to vibrate in the kK K 2 500 REPORT—-- 1878. 2, If during this vibration the tin-foil on the cylinder be passed in front of the needle, the vibrating needle stamps a wave-trace on the tin-foil. 3. The tin-foil preserves this trace during its subsequent motion. 4, If at any subsequent time the stamped tin-foil passes in front of the needle when it is not vibrating (the analogue of a cold atom), the needle is caused to vibrate in the same period as before. These analogies would be more perfect if the needle were set into vibration by being attached to a tuning-fork of definite period of vibration. It appears, then, that the co-existence of such yortex atoms and ultramundane corpuscles as Sir William Thomson has devised leads to the conclusion that hot bodies must emit radiations which may be absorbed by cold bodies. The question naturally arises, Can this action be the keystone to a new theory of light? Can the phenomena of reflection, refraction, interference, diffraction, and polarisation be explained by this kind of actionP In answer to these questions it can at present only pe said that the germs of a complete theory of light do exist in this speculation. Section B.—CHEMICAL SCIENCH. PRESIDENT OF THE SECTION.—Professor Maxwell Simpson, M.D., F.R.S,, F.C.S. THURSDAY, AUGUST 15, 1878. Professor MAxweELL Simpson gaye the following Address :— My position here is a highly honourable, but by no means a comfortable one. Naturally, you expect to hear from me something new about the science which occupies the attention of this section, and I have the miserable feeling that I must disappoint you. How can I possibly find a fact in chemistry with which you are not already acquainted? If, in order to cater for you, I go to France, Germany, Russia or America, I find the abstractors of the Chemical Society have been there before me, and have swept everything of value into their Journal. Chemists are now d&kept perfectly acquainted with the progress of science in every part of the world, and therefore the raison d’étre of this address, so far as announcing the discoveries of the yearis concerned, has passedaway. I therefore propose, instead of giving you a concentrated essence of the last twelve numbers of the ‘ Journal of the Chemical Society,’ to bring before you the claims of this science to a place in general education, and the claims of original research to a place in the curriculum for higher degrees in our Universities. . I have been deyoted to chemistry all my life. It has been my business and my pleasure. The longer I live the more deeply am I impressed with the advantages to be derived from its study, and I am anxious that these advantages should be shared by the rising generation. Whether we take into account the value of the knowledge acquired, the dis- cipline of the intellectual faculties in acquiring that knowledge, or the effect on the character, surely we have a right to give the study of this science a prominent place in our schools and colleges. It would be difficult to over-estimate the value and extent of the knowledge we derive from chemistry. Without it we can know nothing about the air we breathe, the water we drink, or the food we eat; we can- not understand the processes of combustion, respiration, fermentation, putrefaction, or the endless chemical changes which are continually in operation around us, and which affect our lives for good or for evil. In a word, the whole of the phenomena of nature must for ever remain to us, more or less, an inscrutable mystery. Again, is it not desirable that we should have some acquaintance with the chemical arts, from which we derive so many of our comforts and luxuries? Should we not know something of the arts of photography, dyeing, metallurgy— something of the manufacture of glass and china, and of the thousand beautiful things that are constantly in our hands? Not only is the knowledge we obtain from chemistry very considerable in itself, but it furnishes us with a key, which enables us to unlock vast stores of knowledge, contained in several other sciences— these are, Physics, Geology, Mineralogy, Physiology, and I may now add, Astro- nomy. Physicsand chemistry are so intimately connected that it is difficult to say 502 REPORT—1878, wherethe one beginsand the otherends, The help that chemistry gives to physics is shown by the numbers of chemists who have distinguished themselves as physicists. I may mention a few belonging to our own time—Andrews, Bunsen, Faraday, Frank- land, Graham, Guthrie, and Regnault. With regard to mental discipline, the mind of the student is exercised in both the inductive and deductive methods of reasoning. His original faculties are stimu- lated by the consciousness that he can in many cases readily test the worth of his ideas by experiment. With inexpensive apparatus and a good balance, the intelli- gent student can make out for himself some of the laws and many of the facts of the science, and it may be, also, add to them. He glides insensibly from the known to the unknown. Indeed his spirit of inquiry, demands, in most cases, to be curbed rather than spurred. Some students are constantly finding out new methods of analysis or discovering the precious metals in impossible places, The readiness with which we can cross over into the terra incognita of chemistry, and make little explorations there, constitutes in my opinion the great charm of this science, and, to a great extent, its value as an educational agent. What I wish to insist upon is, that the student of chemistry can reach the field of original work sooner than the student of most other sciences. Once he commences original re- search, the developement of his intellectual faculties rapidly progresses. His imagi- nation is daily exercised in propounding new theories, and devising experiments in order to ascertain their truth or falsehood. And what more valuable intellectual training can there be than the habit of subjecting our ideas to-the testof inexorable experiment? In the world outside chemistry, we are, alas! too ready to take things for granted. The chemist’s motto is, Prove all things. The ancients adopted a different method: they assumed certain principles and reasoned from them. ‘They therefore did little in science. hemistry promotes in a remarkable manner accuracy, thoroughness, and. cir- cumspéction. An organic analysis requires six weighings : if any one of these is inaccurate, the results are worthless, A qualitative test carelessly applied may cause us, in a research, to waste months in the pursuit of a phantom or Will-o’-the- Wisp’ which can have no corporeal existence. If we have to employ absolute alcohol in our experiments, we must not be satisfied with going through the cere- mony of making it absolute, but we must assure ourselves, that it 7s absolute. Unless wé are sure of every step in our research, our results become doubtful, and therefore 6f no value. ‘ 4 On the circumspection, also, of the original worker large demands are made. The avenues by which error may creep in and vitiate his results are very numerous. These he must foresee, and endeavour to close up. Laboratory work teaches us to use our senses aright, sharpens our powers of observation, and prevents us from reasoning rashly from appearances. It also promotes manual dexterity, and trains the hands to work in subordination to the head. Perhaps in no other science is the student so deeply impressed with the order and economy of nature, the immutability of her laws, and the exactness of her operations. These impressions will, no doubt, in after life impart seriousness to his character, and save him from the adoption of many a wild theory. I come now to the effect of original work on the character. Many virtues are necessary to the chemist—courage, resolution, truthfulness, and patience. He is often obliged to perform experiments which are attended with great danger, and no man can hope to fight long with the elements without carrying away many a scar. Sometimes fatal accidents oceur. Many years ago, Mr. Hennel, of the Apothecaries’ Hall, London, lost his life by the explosion of a fulminating powder which he was preparing for the East India Company. And many of us recollect the sad death of young Mr, Chapman, a distinguished chemist whom I had the pleasure of knowing, who was literally blown to atoms while working in the Hartz Mountains on a new dynamite which he had himself discovered. I must tell the ladies, however, that accidents are not always so disastrous, but that often one may escape with merely the loss of an eye. But the chemist must not be discouraged by fear of accident, neither must he be disheartened by the temporary failure of his experiments, nor at the slowness of his processes. Bunsen was obliged to evaporate 44 tons of the waters of the Diircheim springs in order to obtain 200 grains of his new metal, TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION B. 503 Cesium. It took Berthelot several months to form, by a series of synthetical operations, an appreciable quantity of alcohol from water and carbon, derived from carbonate of baryta, Many years ago, in the laboratory of Wurtz—my honoured master—a poor student, whom I knew, was carrying from one room to another a glass globe, which contained the product of a month’s continuous labour, when the bottom of the globe fell out and the contents were lost. Nothing daunted, he re- commenced his month’s work, and brought his research to a successful issue. Above all things, the chemist must be ¢7'we. He must not allow his wishes to bias his judgment or prevent him from seeing his researches in their true light. He must not be satisfied that his results appear true, but he must believe them to be true; and haying faithfully performed his éxperiments, he must record them faithfully. He may often be obliged to chronicle his own failures and describe operations that tell against his own theories, but this hard test of his truthfulness he must not shrink from. But I must not weary you with the virtues of the chemist. If I have succeeded in showing that the pursuit of this science tends largely to develope the intellect and discipline the character, I think I have done something for chemistry. We are told by Bishop Butler that “habits of virtue acquired by discipline are improve- . ment in yirtue, and improvement in virtue must be advancement in happiness.” Iamglad to see that the importance of original research as a part of higher education is at last beginning to be recognised in this country. The Royal University Commission at Oxford has recently recommended that candidates for thehigher degrees in science shall in that University be required in future to work out an original investigation. In Germany, whereeducation hasbeen solong and so well understood, original work has been, for at least the last half century, a sine gud non for a degree. Another admirable rule exists in that country, the adoption of which in Great Britain might go far to wash out the stain from our islands, of not having contributed our fair quota to the advancement of human knowledge. It is this— the Germans make a point of securing invariably, that’ their scientific chairs shall be filled by men who haye already distinguished themselves by their discoveries. The professor, on his appointment, naturally desires to continue his investigations, and endeavours to secure, and usually succeeds in securing, the assistance of his pupils. Thisis a mutual advantage. The professor is able to do more work for science, and the student, on his part, learns to conduct for himself an original in- vestigation. Hence there is always a rising generation of original workers in Ger- many, who turn out papers more or less meritorious with the rapidity of a Walter's press. They are stimulated by the hope of one day arriving themselves at a pro- fessor’s chair, the path to which they are well assured is only through the toilsome field of original work. But I must not wrong the German student by the impli- cation of a purely selfish motive in his work. His labour is one of love, and his ambition, for the time at least, is bounded by the desire to do something for science. And from a multitude of such enthusiasts the great professors come. Great moun- tains are only found in mountainous countries. I find myself insensibly led to speak of the encouragement of research in this country; and although it has been very largely discussed in scientific circles, I will venture to add a few words. To promote original work here, I believe it is indis- pensable that our professors should be well paid. It would save them from the necessity of supplementing their incomes by commercial analyses, and thus enable them to devote their spare time to original work. And to secure that they shall have spare time, I would like to see in every laboratory a competent assistant, who would be able occasionally to take up the professor's lectures, should he be engaged in important work. There are many around me who know how very exacting original investigation is, and how necessary it is, at times, to be able to work on without interruption ; bits and scraps of time being of no value. I am glad to see that the Oxford Commission also recommends the appointment of well-paid assist- ants. Well-paid professorships and well-paid assistantships would be attractive prizes for our students to work up to; andif it were clearly understood that the only way to these prizes was through original investigation, we should very soon have an army of zealous and competent workers. The plan of appointing a staff of original workers unconnected with teaching 504 REPORT—1878. has been proposed ; but I do not approve of it. The original worker is, as a rule, the best teacher, and the rising generation of students should not be deprived of the ~ advantage of his instruction. Moreover, as I said before, the professor may be greatly assisted by his pupils. No doubt the Government grant fund does a good deal for science, but the field of its operations is, under present conditions, limited. Professors, as a rule, are so occupied with teaching that they cannot avail themselves of the fund ; and of those students who might be competent and willing, very few can afford to doso. Instead of trusting to the precarious and insufficient support of the fund, they must endeavour to settle themselves permanently in life. It is much to be regretted that the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, with such splendid revenues at their disposal, should contribute so little to the advance- ment of physical science. I hope the day is not far distant when the fellowships— or at least a few of them—which now go to reward young men for merely passing a good examination, shall be given without examination to men who shall have ad- vanced human knowledge in any department. At present, a fellowship of 2507. or 300/. a year, lasting ten or twelve years, and in some cases for life, may be obtained on showing proof of a good memory—or, at most, a capacity for assimilating other men’s ideas. To make discoveries—to follow out a new train of thought, and estab- lish it by experiments specially devised to that end, has been left not only without reward, but almost without recognition, in our two principal seats of learning. Is it to be so always? The world at large, ignorant as it is, has a sounder instinct on this subject, and the man who makes the humblest addition to the stock of know- ledge in the world rarely fails to receive the world’s respect and honour, The suggestions I have ventured to make could not, of course, be well carried out unless the Government take into its own hands the appointment to all scientific chairs, Of this I think I see indications. I believe that sooner or later the Govern- ment will assume the supreme direction of education in this country. It has already taken primary education under its control, and quite recently, here in Ireland, inter- mediate education to a great extent. And does the appointment of so many University Commissions not show a disposition on the part of the Government to assume the direction of higher education also ? The following Papers were read :— 1. Report of Committee on some of the lesser-known Alkaloids. See Reports, p. 105. 2. Report on the best means of Developing Light from Coal Gas, part I. See Reports, p. 108. 3. On the Amounts of Sugar contained in the Nectar of various Flowers. By Aupx. S8. Witson, M.A., B.Sc. Nectar, the sweet-tasted liquid found within the cups of insect-fertilised flowers, is of service to the plant possessing it by affording an inducement whereby nsects are attracted to visit the flowers. By this means cross-fertilisation is effected, as bees, butterflies, and other insects, in their search for the nectar, bring with them polien from other flowers adhering to their bodies which they deposit on the stigmas. Mr. Darwin has shown experimentally what an additional amount of vigour is thus conferred on the resulting seeds in contrast with the degenerat- ing effect of continuous inbreeding or self-fertilisation. Very often this sweet fluid is exuded from special glands, but in other cases from portions of the flower that do not seem to have been specially adapted for this purpose. Morphologically, nectaries may represent very different structures, but not unfrequently they are of TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION B. 505 the nature of an aborted organ such as a petal or stamen. It is a disputed point among physiologists whether this saccharine matter is a true secretion or simply an excretion of. effete matter from vegetable cells—a bi-product of the chemical changes taking place within these cells. Nectar is, of course, the source whence the bee derives honey, but it also affords sustenance to many different kinds of insects as well as humming-birds. The bright colours of flowers, as shown by Sir John Lubbock’s experiments, serve for the guidance of insects to them, and the odours which they emit fulfil the same end. The markings on a flower’s petals, too, always converge towards the nectar. The importance of these guides to insects will be apparent from the following estimations, which show how indispensable it is that as little time as possible should be lost by an insect while collecting honey. It must be remembered, also, that in order to protect the nectar from rain, it is usually contained in the least accessible part of the flower. The formation of nectar is observed to take place most freely in hot weather. So great, however, is » the economy of the plant, that it is only formed at the time when insects’ visits would be beneficial, z.c., when the anthers are shedding their pollen or when the stigma is mature. Biologists believe that the visits of bees, butterflies, and other insects have in past time exercised an important influence in modifying the size, shape, colour, &c., of flowers. The following determinations are of interest as showing to what extent this action goes on, and as a help towards ascertaining the value of this factor:— Suear in: Frowers. (Fehling’s process.) -,| Cane? Total | Fruit | (as fruit) mem MECH sie, PET OWED 22. s.cc.ds-dkessoccconldvecsecoseseres 7:59 | 1:69 59 2. Everlasting pea, per flower ............ceseceseeeeeees ees 9:93, | 8:33 1:60 saVeteln( VasGCracca), Peri TACOMe. +: .00...cevcesseseer oceeee 316 | 315 ‘Ol Be ssh POL GUNGLO TOWED -.0..c0c--scvesnceceessceceesemeriees 158; +158 = PRPELeG OlOVET, Per HORM. .cersscccnarocosdseeveseesteectsaaccete 7:93 | 595 | 1:98 6. r PMVONGLM eens csvadecres cc ssdeesercece "132 099 033 Wee Monikshood, per flower \....0..02..s.cecvseoresccesesseees 641 | 463 | 1:78 8. Claytonia Alsinordes, per floweY ......eceeeseresereeeens ‘413| :175 283 Approximately, then, 100 heads of glover yield ‘8 grm. sugar, or 125 give 1 grm. or 125,000 1 kilo. sugar; and as each head contains about 60 florets, it follows that 7,500,000 distinct flower tubes must be sucked in order to obtain 1 kilogramme of sugar. Now, as honey roughly contains 75 per cent. of sugar, 1 kilo. is equivalent to 5,600,000 flowers in round numbers, or say two and a-half millions of visits for 1 Ib. of honey! Another point worthy of note in these results is the occurrence of what appears to be cane sugar, and that in the case of fuchsia in the proportion of three-fourths of the whole. This is remarkable, as honey is usually supposed to contain no cane sugar, its presence being generally held as certain evidence of adulteration. The question, therefore, arises whether this change, which occurs while’ the sugar is in the bee's possession be due to the action of juices with which it comes in contact while in the honey-bag, or whether on account of the acid reaction of nectar it may not take place spontaneously. 4. On the Action of Chlorine upon the Nitroprussides.* By Dr. Komunp W. Davy, Professor of Forensic Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons, Ireland. The nitroprussides are an interesting class of compounds obtained by the action of nitric acid on the soluble ferro or ferri-cyanides, which were first investigated by * In eatenso in the ‘Chemical News,’ Vol. XX XVIII. No. 105. 506 REPORT—1878. Dr. Lyon Playfair several years ago. In this communication the author showed that the statements which exist in the different standard works on chemistry, as to chlorine having no action on those salts, are not correct, at least, as regards several of the nitroprussides, which he has made the subject of investigation ; for he has found that some of them are immediately, and others after long exposure to its influence, more or less acted on by that substance, even when they are excluded from light. When, however, they are subjected to the combined action of chlorine and the sun’s rays, they are soon completely decomposed, the principal product being an oil-like matter, which appears to possess all the properties belonging to the compound known under the name of chlorocyanic oil (C,N,Cl,,), ferric chlovide, hydrochloric acid, and a chloride of the metallic base of the salt employed. The following nitroprussides, viz., those of potassium, sodium, barium, calcium, zinc, iron and silver, were found to be thus decomposed, when exposed to the com- bined action of chlorine and sun light, and it is probable that other nitroprussides would be similarly affected. ; The only one of those salts, however, which the author has observed resisting this action is that of copper, which has remained apparently unaffected after some weeks’ exposure to its influence. 5. The Adulteration Act in so far as it relates to the Prosecution of Muilk- sellers. By Wrnest H. Coox, B.Sc., F.R.C.S., Lecturer wpon Experi- mental Physics at the Bristol Trade and Mining School. The object of this paper is to call attention to the unsatisfactory state of the law relating to the prosecution of milk-sellers. In many cases innocent vendors have been fined, and also, we may be sure fraudulent dealers have gone unpunished. Not- withstanding that milk-sellers are constantly being fined for selling an inferior article, yet mill continues to be the chief adulterated article of food. The Act has practically failed to deter the sophistication of this article. We can only explain this by the fact that milkmen find that they are fined whether they sell a pure article or an adulterated one. It pays them best to adulterat#, and they do so. In proof of this two cases are mentioned. In the first seyeral analysts have certified cer- tain samples of pure milk to be adulterated, and in the second a sample of mill obtained from a cow fed on desiccated grain was certified as skim-milk. The records of our police courts tell us that milk-sellers are constantly being fined for selling milk which they declare most emphatically to be pure and unadulterated. Three courses are open to us to explain these anomalies :-— Firstly. To place implicit reliance on the analyst, and therefore to disbelieve the deliberate statements of the farmers and milk-sellers. Secondly. To believe the farmer, and therefore to consider the analyst wholly at fault. Thirdly. To reconcile both by attributing the poverty to a variation in the article. In most cases the third will be found to be the true explanation. Notwithstanding the statement of Professor Wanklyn, milk 7s a substance which varies greatly in quality. In the author’s experience he has found as great a difference as 18 per cent. in the value of pure milk, and Dr. Voelcker has published analyses in which a much greater difference occurs. It appears that milk is Subject to four different kinds of variation, viz. :— a, A variation owing to the food. 8. A variation owing to the season. y. A variation owing to the animal. 6. A variation owing to health. Illustrations of these are given in the paper. In consequence of these variations, analysts, if they wish to determine if a sample of milk is adulterated, take, as a standard, the lowest percentage of solids or “ solids not fat” which pure milk has been found to contain. This is the principle of the course adopted, but it is open to the following objections :— TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION B. 507 Firstly. Each analyst being allowed to fix this percentage himself, we have different standards employed, and consequently may have a milkman fined in one town for selling an article which a neighbouring analyst may declare pure. Secondly. The percentage fixed upon cannot be the lowest contained by pure milk, because we do not know it. The amount found by Dr. Voelcker (9°35 of solids) is the lowest at present known, but a lower number may be found. Thirdly. This lower limit is so low that with an ordinary sample a considerable amount of watering may take place without the possibility of detection. For many obvious reasons it is necessary to remedy this state of things. One method only appears to offer a chance of success, briefly, this is to buy and sell milk by quality instead of by quantity. The difficulty of introducing this practice is more imaginary than real. One easy method is as follows:—Divide the milk into two qualities, first quality and second quality. The former will include all milk containing 12-0 per cent. of solids or 9:0 per cent. of “ solids not fat” or more, and may be sold, say, at 4d. per quart. The latter will include all milk containing less than these numbers, and may be sold at :i4d. per quart. Ifa sample of first quality milk be sold which, on analysis, does not contain the stated quantity, the vendor will be fined. The great difficulty here is in making the division into two qualities. In order to do this effectually, some simple instrument capable of making a rough analysis is required. At present such an instrument does not exist, but we may rely on one being forthcoming if the need be felt. In conclusion, the following advantages are claimed for this method :-— _ 1. The analyst not being called upon to decide upon the purity of the article, but simply whether it contains a certain percentage of solids or of “‘ solids not fat,” cannot make such deplorable mistakes as at present. 2. The vendor will not be fined unjustly. 3. It will tend to stop adulteration because a better price can be obtained for a better article. 4. An article of greater constancy will be supplied to the public. 6. On some Fluor Compounds of Vanadium. By Professor H. E. Roscos, PRD., FR.S. 508 REPORT—1878. FRIDAY, AUGUS1 16, 1878. The following Papers*were read :— 1. Notes on Aluminium Alcohols. By Dr. Guapstone and ALFRED TRIBE. In 1876 the authors described the joint action of aluminium and iodine on alcohol, and two aluminium ethylates which resulted from it. They now showed that a similar reaction takes place with methylic alcohol, especially when the aluminium is rendered more powerful by conjunction with deposited platinum ; and that an analogous aluminium compound is still more readily formed from amylic alcohol. These two substitution products had not yet been prepared in a pure con- dition, but the authors had succeeded in preparing the butylic compound in a satis- factory manner. This aluminic butylate is a solid body at the ordinary tempera- ture, but melts when heated, and is capable of distillation. It is very soluble in anhydrous ether or benzole, from which it separates on evaporation, but without cerystallising. It is decomposed by water, butylic alcohol and alumina being pro- duced. Its composition was found to be Al,(C,H,O),. ° There is also evidence of an intermediate compound, soluble in water, which is probably homologous with the aluminic iodo-ethylate, Al,I,(C,H,O).. 2. On the Estimation of Mineral Oil or Paraffin Wax when mixed with other Oils or Fats.* By Wittaam Tuomson, F.R.S.L. Mixed oils are now often used for lubricating purposes, and a common mixture composed of mineral oil with some animal, vegetable, or fish oil is extensively used, and it is an important point to be able by analysis to determine the amount of mineral oil which such mixtures contain ; and as I could find no published pro- cess to effect this, I devised, after much work, the following, which I found by repeated tests to give accurate results:—Some of the sample is boiled with an alcoholic solution of caustic soda, which converts all the animal, vegetable, or fish oils into soap. This is then mixed with sand, evaporated to dryness on the steam bath, the residue placed in a bottle and washed with petroleum spirit, which has been previously distilled at a temperature not exceeding 190° Fahy. This dissolves out the mineral oil, leaving the soap insoluble. The spirit is now distilled off from the spirit solution in a large flask, and after thus evaporating off the bulk of the spirit, the concentrated solution is transferred to a smaller flask with a hole blown in its side, into which is fitted a cork carrying a thermometer and a glass tube; the thermometer should touch the liquid, going nearly to the bottom of the flask, which is placed on a sand bath and heated at a temperature not exceeding 220° Fahr., and dry air blown into the flask through the tube in the cork, to remove the last trace of spirit, and the residue of mineral oil weighed and cal- culated on the weight of original mixed oil taken. A small correction must be allowed for an amount of unsaponifiable oil which so-called saponifiable oils always contain, but this is about 0°6 per cent. of the saponifiable oil found. * «Chemical News,’ Vol. XX XVIII., No. 984, Oct. 4, 1878. ‘ ae TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION B. 509 3. On the Action of Heat on the Selenate of Ammonium.* By Dr. Epmunp W. Davy, Professor of Forensic Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons, Treland. The author read on behalf of his colleague Dr. Charles A. Cameron and himself a paper containing the results of some observations which they had con- jointly made on the action of heat upon the selenate of ammonium, The study of the effects of that agent on the sulphate of ammonium, having in the hands of different chemists led to interesting results, the authors thought it desirable to insti- tute some experiments on the selenate of that base, to ascertain whether any corre- sponding products would be obtained by its exposure to heat, selenic and sulphuric acids agreeing so closely in their properties, and this subject being hitherto unin- yestigated as far as they were aware. Some selenate of ammonium, after thorough drying at 100° C., was heated in a bath of paraffine, the degrees of temperature to which it was exposed being indi- eated by a thermometer. It was found that when the salt was heated to about 180° C., the evolution of a minute quantity of ammonia could be readily detected, and finding that the amount evolved increased with the rise of temperature, the heat was gradually raised to about 250° C., when the development of ammonia be- came much more abundant, whilst at the same time water and selenium began to be separated. ; This temperature was then continued as long as ammonia was evolved, and till acid vapours made their appearance, when the heat was withdrawn. On examining the residue after this treatment, it was found that the selenate of ammonium had been completely decomposed, selenium and selenious anhydride, being the remaining products. Wishing to ascertain if any gaseous matter was evolved during the decomposition, some selenate of ammonium was heated ina tube filled with mercury, when a considerable volume of a gas not absorbed by water was obtained, which on examination was found to be nitrogen. It should also be stated, that the salt was observed to have acquired a strong acid reaction, before its final breaking up at the highest temperature to which it had been exposed in the paraffine bath ; indicating the formation of an acid salt in the first stage of its de- composition by heat. From the results of those and of other experiments made by the authors, they have come to the conclusion, that when selenate of ammonium is heated it first resolves itself into ammonia and an acid selenate of ammonium, and that this salt, on further heating, breaks up into selenium, selenious anhydride, water, and nitrogen, and that the reactions which occur in the process may probably be expressed by the following formule : Ist stage.—4{ (NH,)?SeO, j= 4(NH,. H. SeO,) + 4NH,. 2nd stage.—4(NH,. H. SeO,) =Se + 3S8e0, + 10(H,0) +N,. A number of circumstances, however, have as yet prevented the authors being able to confirm the correctness of the above formule by actual results. In conclusion, the foregoing observations are interesting, a3 they show that in the first stage of the decomposition of the selenate of ammonium by heat, there is an acid salt formed, like as in the case of the sulphate of that base when similarly treated, as was pointed out by Dr. Schweitzer ; but in the separation of selenium, in the second stage of the process, there is no analogy in the case of the sulphate of ammonium. 4, A New Method of Alkalimetry. By Louis Smsorp, F.0.8. The method recommended by the author consists in the reverse application or Liebig’s process for estimating hydrocyanic acid, and is based on the fact that the _ volumetric determination of an alkaline cyanide by means of silver nitrate is in no- _ wise affected by the presence of free hydrocyanic acid. From the volume of silver = ihe solution used, the quantity of alkali may be as readily calculated as that of the etyanogen. If the applicability of this process for alkalimetric purposes were con- * In extenso in the ‘ Chemical News,’ Vol, XXXVIII, 133, 510 REPORT— 1878. fined to the estimation of caustic alkalies, nobody would, in the author's opinion, think of using it in preference to the process commonly used ; but he wished to show that it might with great advantage be applied to the determination of alka- line carbonates. From 0:5 to 1 gramme of the potassium or sodium carbonate should be dissolved in about 100 c.c. of distilled water, the solution mixed with an excess of hydrocyanic acid (10 to 20 c.c. of acid of Scheele’s strength), and then deci- normal solution of silver nitrate added from a burette until a permanent opalescence is produced. The reaction occurs in accordance with the following equation :— K,00, + 2HOy + AgNO, = KAgCy, + KNO, + CO, The first drop used in excess causes a precipitation of silver cyanide. Whereas under ordinary circumstances hydrocyanic acid is incapable of decomposing alka- line carbonates, it effects a complete decomposition in the presence of silver nitrate. The mixture does not require boiling, and the whole operation may be performed within a few minutes. If after the end of the titration the mixture is boiled, and the addition of decinormal solution of silver nitrate proceeded with, this time using potassium chromate as an indicator, the volume of silver solution required to ensure complete precipitation of the silver cyanide will be exactly equal to that used in the first titration. ‘ KAgCy, + AgNO, =2Ag0y + KNO,. This second reaction might then, if desired, be used as a check on the determi- nation. In the presence of chloride, the volume of silver solution used in the second experiment will be greater than that used in the first, the difference between the two being exactly that required to precipitate the chloride. In this manner a determination of the chloride might be readily combined with that of the alkaline carbonate. The following results were quoted to show the great accuracy of the process :— Pure Potassium carbonate used Carbonate found i 0:5851 0°1670 0:1672 0°8775 0:8779 Mixtures of pure potassium carbonate and sodium chloride :— Used Found K,CO, sia = ee 0-2000 0:2005 NaCe 4° ods ae 0:0680 0:0683 Jf K,CO, eas ree ae 0:9760 0:9750 | NaCe ae ae HE 0:1825 01830 The author gives the following reasons why for the essay of samples of potash or soda he considers this process as better than the one usually employed :— 1. The solution does not require boiling, and the operation therefore requires less time than the usual process. 2. The change from absolitte clearness to an unmistakable turbidity as produced by a single drop of the reagent is more striking than that of the colour of litmus brought about by a drop of normal sulphuric or hydrochloric acid. 3. The test solution being a deci-normal one, the results obtained are more accurate than those obtained with standard normal mineral acids. ° 4, With but little additional trouble, and without having to operate on fresh sample, the process may be readily coupled with an accurate determination of the chloride present in the alkaline carbonate. In concluding, Mr. Siebold stated that he was at present engaged in experiments showing a still wider range of useful applicability of this process ; and that the re- ay of these experiments he hoped to be able shortly to lay before the Chemical Society. ; i SATURDAY, AUGUST 17, 1878. The Section did not meet. TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION B. 511 : MONDAY, AUGUST 19, 1878. The following Papers were’ read :— 1. Notes on Water from the Severn Tunnel Springs. By Witritam Lanr Carpenter, B.A., B.Sc., F.C.8. The plans for the construction of this tunnel had been fully described to Section G, at the Bristol (1875) Meeting, by its engineer, Mr. Charles Richardson. By the summer of the present year, the trial heading, part of which was to form the per- manent drain of the tunnel, had been driven more than half way across under the Severn, which was 2} miles wide at that point, and had successfully passed under the remarkable channel of the “Shoots.” In driving through the pennant rock, several springs had been met with, some of which had since run dry, In the opinion of the engineer, no Severn water could find its way to these springs, the source of which he thought were the “backs” in the pennant. The author had analysed water from four springs, and from the Severn at various states of tide, and from deep land wells in the neighbourhood, the results of which led him to believe that by far the greater portion of the water flowing from these springs was derived from the Severn. Details of the analyses were given. 2. On the Thetines.* By BH. A. Lerrs, Professor of Chemistry, University College, Bristol. The experiments were undertaken as a sequel to the research made by Professor Crum Brown and the author on dimethyl thetine and its compounds, and with a view to the thorough investigation of the thetines as a group—the phenomena attending their formation, the action of heat and oxidizing agents on them, and the difference in their properties as the series is ascended. Incidentally the action of bromacetic acid on certain hydrocarbon sulphides, and the action of bromacetic and iodacetic ethyl ether on sulphide of methyl were studied. 3. On the Spectrum of Chlorochromic Acid. By G. Jonnsronn Stonny and Professor J. Emerson Reynoxps. See above, p. 434. 4. Summary of Investigations on the Pyridine Series. By Dr. W. Ramsay. These bases, which possess the general formula OxH,,,_,, are tertiary bases. They form an additive product with iodides of alcohol radicals, of which a good example is O,H,N.CH,I, best named pyridine methyl-iodide, as it resembles a salt in its constitution. They are not attacked by nitrous acid; and the cyanate, when heated, undergoesno molecular change, but merely splits up into the base, _ and the usual polymer of cyanic acid, cyanuric acid. * For a detailed account of the above, see ‘ Trans. Roy. Soc, Edin.’ 1878. 512 REPORT—-1878. Picoline, C,H,N, on oxidation yields a dicarbo-pyridenic acid, O,H.NO,, which, on distillation with soda-lime, decomposes into pyridine, C,H.N, and car- ponic anhydride, 2CO,. It has, therefore, the structural formula C,H,N(CO.OH),. Attempts to prepare lutidine, C,H,N, from the aldehyde of that acid, as well as by the reaction O,H,N(CO.0.CH,), =C;H,N +200, failed, owing, in the first instance, to the small yield of aldehyde, and, in the second, to the total decom- sition of the product into pyridine, carbonic anhydride, and carbon. In spite of the failure of these attempts, the author regards it as probable that picoline is methyl-pyridine from the following consideration :—The amount of heat evolved in the formation of these bases is probably very high. That heat, added to the amount evolved by the combination of the base with an acid, is likely to be greater than the total number of heat-units evolved during oxidation of the base; hence these bases are unoxidisable in acid solution. But when oxidised in alkaline solution, the amount of heat evolved by oxidation is supplemented by that arising from the combination of the resulting acid with the alkali, and then exceeds the heat evolved during formation of the base. The presence of nitrogen therefore gives great stability to the molecule, and prevents the methyl-groups from being oxidised to carboxyl groups, as is the case with toluol, xylol, &e. At least three acids of the formula C,H,NO, have been discovered, and it is pro-- bable that as many as six are capable of existence. These the author has named a, 8, and y, dicarbopyridenic acids. The a-acid is obtained by oxidising picoline or lutidine, and the last two from lutidine. An attempt to pass from furfurol to pyridine by the series of reactions— po } C.H,O0Ce C,H,ON 2) 5-6 ~ 2? Ss 5 , 5 Furfurol. Furfuryl Furfuryl ek , alcohol. chloride. amine. CeHENG Pyridine, was unsuccessful, owing to the instability of furfuryl chloride. From the stability of the pyridine group, and the instability of the furfurol group, the author regards it as probable that the constitution of the former is best expressed by a closed, and that of the latter by an open chain. 5. On some of the Derivatives of Furfurol. By Dr. W. Ramsay. It was found impossible to prepare furfuryl chloride by the action of phos- phorie chloride, or of hydrochloric acid gas on furfuryl alcohol, O5H,O,, owing to a complete decomposition of the organic matter, with separation of carbon. Furfurine, prepared by heating furfuramide, and possessing the same formula, C,,H,,N,0,, unites with methyl-iodide, forming the hydriodide of methyl-furfurine ; this salt, on treatment with ammonia, deposits the base C,,H,, (CH,)N,O,, as a viscous oil, insoluble in water, but soluble in alcohol. The base again unites with methyl-iodide, giving the hydriodide of dimethyl-furfurine, C,;H,,(CH,),N,O,HI, also decomposable by ammonia with liberation of the base, dimethyl-furfurine, C,,H,,(CH,).N203. This base appears also to be capable of union with methyl- iodide. sited 3 hydrogen replace obanle to decide, then, appears to be a secondary base, containing two atoms of able by methyl. Whether more can be replaced the author was as the loss by repetition of the operation was very considerable. 6. Nitric Acid; its Reproduction from the lower Oxides of Nitrogen. By Bernarp C. Motnoy. In treating in this short memoir of the economic use of nitric acid, it would be well to state by way of preface why it is considered worthy of such attention. TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION B. oes We are aware in the first place that it is the highest oxide of nitrogen known, that, parting so easily and freely with its oxygen as it does, it stands highest in the list of oxidising agents, and consequently amongst the most useful chemical re-agents in manufacturing enterprises. There are two drawbacks in some cases fatal to its use: one is the high price of the acid; and the other the injurious and malodorous gases which are evolved during the deoxidation of the acid. The object, therefore, in these researches has ‘been twofold—firstly, to introduce the greatest possible economy in the use of nitric acid ; and secondly, to get rid of the malodorous and injurious gases which are evolved. In effecting the former the latter has been successfully attained. To make this operation clear it will be well to recall for a moment the severa oxides of nitrogen. There are five compounds of nitrogen with oxygen, containing respectively 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 volumes of oxygen to 2 of nitrogen, viz., taking them in the as- cending order of the oxygen— 1. Nitrous oxide, N,O. 2. Nitric oxide, N,O,. 3. Nitrous anhydride, N,O,. 4, Nitrogen peroxide, N,O,. 5. Nitric anhydride, N,O,. If water be added to the fifth or highest oxide, we have nitric acid H,N,O,, or 2HNO,. When any oxidisable substance is presented to nitric acid, the nitric acid parts with a portion of its oxygen to combine with the substance to be oxidised, and the nitrogen is evolved, combined with the remaining oxygen as lower oxides of nitrogen. Under the most favourable conditions not more than fifty per cent. of the oxygen contained in the nitric acid can be used for the purpose of oxidation. In many cases, however, the percentage is as low as twenty. Moreover, a fresh supply of the acid will be required for each successive operation. Now it will be evident that if sufficient oxygen be made to combine with these lower oxides of nitrogen, nitric anhydride will be formed, which, when combined with water, reproduces nitric acid. To effect this reproduction economically, the “means” employed must themselves be economical in order to be useful. We will deal with the gases evolved during the deoxidation of nitric acid. These gases will be composed of a mixture of lower oxides of nitrogen, which will be of adeep brownish red colour, caused by the presence of nitrogen peroxide. These gases or fumes are conducted into the chamber or towers where they are to be reoxidised. These towers consist of closed chambers about, for ordinary pur- poses, thirty feet high and three feet in diameter. Their form and material may be varied, but they may be constructed of glazed earthenware pipes or a slate. The tower rests in a reservoir, into which the reconverted acid fallsand from which it is afterwards drawn. Into the sides of the tower may be fitted sight-holes glazed with glass, so that the quantity of the gases may be roughly judged by the depth of the colour inside the tower. The top of each tower is of a conical form, and in _ the centre of the cone is fixed a jet, through which steam and hot water are forced. This jet is so arranged as to be capable of being easily and accurately adjusted in order to cause a cloud or spray of very finely divided hot water of about a tem- perature of 100° O. to fall slowly through the tower or chamber. Atmospheric air is allowed at the same time to enter the tower. The construction of the jets should be so arranged as that the quantities of hot water and the admission of air may be _ regulated at will. As is obvious, the tower should be gas tight, except as hereafter described. Now the gases or fumes coming from the vessel in which the nitric acid is being used will gradually rise till the tower is charged. When so charged the _ jet is brought into action; steam and hot water are turned on into the jet in such _ proportions as that the steam will strike and divide the water into a minutely divided spray, the steam itself being condensed in the water, so that a misty spray of hot water slowly falls down through the tower. oe descent the particles of hot water come into contact with the oxides of , LL 514 REPORT—1878. nitrogen. The nitrous anhydride (N,O,) and nitric oxide (N,O,) are under these conditions immediately oxidised by the air (admitted and drawn in through the air holes or through the jet) into peroxide of nitrogen N,O,. The several reactions may be combined thus :— N,0, + N,O, +30 =2N,0,. This peroxide of nitrogen (N,O,) is quickly absorbed by the spray and decom- posed by it into nitric oxide and nitric acid. The nitric acid is dissolved by the hot water of the spray and carried down into the reservoir at the foot of the tower. The nitric oxide remains undissolved by the spray, but is oxidised as fast as pro- duced by the air into peroxide, which in turn becomes split up into nitric oxide and nitric acid, the latter being collected as before in the reservoir. The re-action may be approximately shown thus :— 6N,0, + 2H,0 = 3N,0, + 8HNO,. Eventually, therefore, the lower oxides of nitrogen becoming oxidised by con- tact with air into the higher peroxide, and this in turn becoming absorbed by the spray and divided into nitric oxide and nitric acid, which latter is always dissolved and carried down, and the reactions being successively continuous, the whole of the original nitric acid, when used and operated upon under these conditions, will be regained. : Practically the whole of these reactions occur simultaneously, so that the nitric acid is reproduced from the lower oxides as soon as they are generated. This process places another weapon in the power of the manufacturer, and ren- ders available for many purposes a re-agent at present limited in its application. In conclusion, I will only add that in no single instance has the process failed or even varied in its results. 7. On some Substances obtained from the Root of the Strawberry. By Dr. T. L. Putrson, F.C.S. The author has found in the root of the strawberry certain substances closely allied with some that are contained in the cinchona barks. The principal of these is called Fragarine, and can be obtained in large quantities by a process which with cinchona bark yields the product called Cimchona ved. There exists in the strawberry root a kind of tannin, closely allied to quinotannic acid, and when its solution is boiled for some time with hydrochloric acid, it decomposes into elucose and fragarine, which is precipitated as a reddish brown amorphous substance, highly electrical by friction, taking a reddish purple colour with alkalies, yielding nitro-and chloro-compounds of a yellow colour, and a conjugated acid with sulphuric acid. On being heated, fragarine yields water and is decomposed. without fusion, yielding much charcoal and a white sublimate, soluble in water, which is, apparently, pyrocatechin; its solution gives a green colour with salts of iron. Melting potash decomposes fragarine with production of dark brown sub- stances and a little protocatechuic acid, which can be isolated by ether from the acidulated solution, and also colours iron salts green. Whilst fragarine is being produced by boiling with hydrochloric acid there is diffused through the laboratory a very agreeable odour of essence of cedar. The root also yields a product very similar to quinovic acid. ; 8. On a new Mineral White Pigment. By Dr. T. L. Puirson, F.C.8. For many years past attempts have been made by several chemists to discover some new mineral white of a less costly and less dangerous nature than white lead. Very little success seems to have attended these researches until quite lately. First, the oxide of zine produced by the combustion of the metal in the air was found to have certain properties which allowed it to be used as a non-poisonous substitute for carbonate of lead. But its production is very costly, and its cover- of 5 on TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION B. 515 ing power or “ body” is not comparable with the latter. Next, an ingenious white or stone-coloured paint was economically produced from oxide of antimony by Dr. Stenhouse, which appeared to answer very well in certain circumstances. I myself have made a great number of experiments with the view of utilising some of the artificial silicates, such as those of lime, magnesia, and zinc, &c., which possess a very brilliant white colour, by submitting them to a great variety of treatments; but I have been unsuccessful in imparting to them anything like the “body ” of white lead; they all become more or less translucid when mixed with oil, like pure silicic acid itself, whatever mechanical treatment they may have pre- viously undergone. Whilst occupied with these researches I learned accidentally that Mr. Thomas Griffiths, of Liverpool, had obtained a new pigment, the basis of which was the white sulphide of zinc, and’ on submitting this new product to examination I found, with considerable astonishment, that it surpassed the ordinary white lead in every respect, in colour, in resistance to the weather and gaseous emanations, and in durability ; moreover, that it was not destructive to the health of the work- men who manufacture or who use it. Mr. Griffiths has been experimenting, I understand, for about ten years upon the best means of producing this new mineral white upon.a large scale, and has, apparently, now brought its preparation to a state of perfection which has gone beyond the most sanguine expectations. A salt of zinc, which may be the sulphate or the chloride, is precipitated by a soluble sulphide ; the latter being either sodium, calcium, or barium sulphide, or a mixture of them;, precautions are taken to ayoid the precipitation of any black sulphide of iron, if perchance the zinc solutions contain a little of that metal; the bulky product is collected, dried, and transferred to a furnace, where it is calcined for some time at a cherry red heat. During the calcination it is carefully stirred to bring each portion successively in contact with the air ; it is then raked out whilst quite hot into vats of cold water, where it is levigated, and afterwards collected and dried. The result is a white pigment of exquisite beauty. Its covering power, when mixed with oil, is greater than that of any substance hitherto discovered, being about 25 per cent. higher than that of the same weight of pure carbonate of lead. According to my analysis, this new product is really an oxy-sulphide of zinc, the composition of which varies somewhat according to the length of the cal- cination and the heat attained. Hence it is a difficult matter to get it exactly of the same composition at each successive operation. Nevertheless, this is attained quite closely enough for practical purposes. The best product appears to correspond in composition as nearly as possible to the formula, 5ZnS+ZnO. But occa- sionally a larger quantity of oxide is produced and the product by means im- proved thereby. In some experiments which I made for the purpose of testing the capabilities of this new white pigment, as compared with the old zine white (oxide of zinc), and white lead (pure carbonate of lead), I was perfectly surprised at the results, my own experiments made with the view of discovering a substitute for the latter haying proved such utter failures, and I look upon this new oxy-sulphide of zine pigment as one of the, most interesting products hitherto derived from mineral chemistry. As it possesses much more covering power than the old zinc white, or oxide of zinc, it is considerably more economical than the latter. As to white lead, it has only one recommendation as a colour, namely, its great “body” or covering power; but it is liable after a time to saponify the oil, producing a soap which is more or less translucid ; moreover, it is darkened by gaseous emanations and it is detrimental to health. The new product possesses none of these draw- backs. It has all the covering power of white lead, combined with permanency in colour, and resistance to the saponifying influence of the oil, and is a much finer white. Nothing more is requisite but to ensure for it a constant composition, and T have little doubt that this difficulty will be overcome in the course of a short’ time. LL2 516 REPORT—1878. TUESDAY, AUGUS1 20, 1878. The following Papers were read :— 1. On a Simplification of Graphic Formule. By Outver J. Lover, D.Sc. In the graphic formule of a compound the elements are ordinarily represented by their chemical symbols (capital letters), and the connection between the atoms by straight lines joining the letters. Now graphic formule are of most use in organic chemistry, where the principal compounds consist only of the elements C, H, O, and N, whose atomicities are generally 4, 1, 2, and 3 or 5 respectively. In any formule, therefore, four bonds generally radiate from the letter CO; N is the meeting-place of three or five bonds, according to-circumstances ; two bonds meet at each O, and a single bond terminates at every H. Supposing then that the letters were omitted and the bonds joined together, the position of the atoms would still be apparent as the meeting-place of a definite number of bonds, and therefore the letters are unnecessary. The simplification proposed in the paper is the omission of the usual symbols used to denote the atoms, and the joining of the bonds in such a way as clearly to define the atomicities, and therefore the natures of the several atoms. Formule so drawn become reduced to a sort of geometrical diagram; and conversely any geometrical diagram represents some real or imaginary chemical compound. For instance, in the accompanying figure— 1 elie ae See 6 7 8 9 10 Se eet Gi aa (1) represents CH* or marsh gas. (2) is common alcohol. (8) is acetic acid. (4) propionic acid. (5) Succinic acid (without the 2 bars in the middle it would be oxalic, with only one malonic, acid), and so on. The free bonds of unsatisfied radicals are easily indicated by arrowheads. When chlorine or iodine substitution compounds are to be shown, the free ends may be dotted, to indicate that the monad is not hydrogen, e.g., Secondary propyl iodide, No. (6). In all cases where graphic formule are used, the common em- pirical formulz will or should be written alongside; and the element intended by the dot in any particular case will therefore be clear. Other details and numerous illustrations are given in the paper. The constitution of a body is thus exhibited in a very cont form which appeals to the eye and impresses itself readily on the memory. The formule of even complex bodies are very rapidly drawn, for a few strokes, instead of representing but a single atom, as H, represents a whole group ; for instance (7) is the radical ethyl; (8) is prussic acid ; (9) ammonic cyanide ; (10) is urea; and the commonly occurring radicals are recognised at once without taking the formule to pieces. At the same time the symbols denoting the different radicals are such as arise naturally, and are not arbitrary and intrinsically meaningless such aseven Et must be held to be ; and they may always be analysed whenever required. re TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION B. : 517 2. On the Detection by means of the Microphone of Sounds which accompany the Diffusion of Gases through a thin Septum. By W. CHANDLER Roserts, /.R.S. The author pointed out that the passage of a gas through a porous septum was undoubtedly due to molecular motion, and as any facts which bear on molecular movement are of much importance, he exhibited and described various forms of apparatus, by the aid of which the passage of hydrogen through thin septa of paper and graphite might be studied withthe microphone. He indi- cated the several points which appeared to be in favour, as well as those which were against the view that the vibrations of the molecules of the gas could actually be detected, and he stated that further experiments were in progress. 3. A short Account of Baeyer’s Synthesis of Indigo. By Professor J. Emerson Reynoxps, M.A., F.C.8. 4, Dr. Ramsay exhibited Victor Meyer's Apparatus for taking Vapour Densities of Substances with High Boiling Points. 5. On the Condensation of the Gases hitherto called Permanent. By Professor James Dewar, F.R.S. 6. On a Method of Elementary Organic Analysis by a Moist Process. By Professor WanKLyn and W. J. Cooper. 7. On some Peculiarities of the Vartry Water, and on the Action of that Water upon Boiler Plates. By Cuartes R, C. Ticnporne, LL.D., Ph.D., F.CS. The water of the river Vartry, from which we get our supply in Dublin, has been repeatedly analysed, therefore I will not trouble the section with a detail of its composition. It will be sufficient for my purpose to remind the section of its general composition, which may be stated to consist of— Organic matter of a peaty nature, 1:6 to 2 grains per gallon. Mineral matter 24 grains per gallon. The mineral matter chiefly consisting of chlorides of the alkalies, and the alkaline earths in equal proportions. ; The hardness is nearly all permanent, as there is but a trace of carbonates present. The point I wish to draw attention to, however, is the presence of nitrates and nitrites. The first are always present, the latter occasivnally in the summer and autumn months. They were present when last tried on the 5rd of August. I have never seen any published analysis which mentions the existence of these acidulous radicals. As my object is to determine the condition of the nitrogen salts, and as heat seems to reduce nitrates when occurring in this water, I had re- source to evaporation by the aid of a vacuum and sulphuric acid; the test I used being the brucia test, an extremely delicate one if properly applied. For my nitrates 1 used a thin starch solution, made with a little dilute glycerine to keep it, and a solution of tartaric acid preserved by alittle salicylicacid. The iodide of 518 REPORT—1878. potassium being carefully purified from iodate, the solutions keep very well, and are reliable. The iodide should be dissolved as required. The Vartry water does not give indications with the tests as a rule without concentrating it. I subjoin the results of my experiments on the 3rd of August :— tu 1. Water evaporated to 4 at 100°. gave a very striking indication of nitrites, besides nitrates. 2. Evaporated in a vacuum to 2 it gave no indication. 3. Evaporated zn vacuo to + it gave an indication of nitrites and nitrates. : In January 1878, the Vartry gave no indication of nitrites, but contained, as usual, nitrates, and gave an indication on evaporating to one-half. We see by these observations that evaporation tends to reduce the nitrates. Also that from fermentative action changes occur at certain periods of the year, which result in the reduction of nitrates to nitrites. | We see also that these nitrates and nitrites are present in very minute quantities. I have never found 0:1 of a grain per gallon said to be present in Loch Katrine water; the highest amount I have ever found being 0:06, determined by the aluminium process. But still, when these salts are rapidly concentrated, as they are in the feeding of high-pressure steam boilers, the nitrogen salts become very serious items of corrosion, owing to the ease with which the acidulous radicals are dissociated at high temperature, e.g.— NaNO, = NaNO, + 0. 2NaNO, + H,O=2(NaHO) + 2NO. 2NO + Fe = FeO + N.O. I exhibit a boiler plate, which is not eaten away by the corrosive action of water, but the corrosion is determined by the steam of the Vartry water. I also exhibit glass corrosion produced by the same means. Some experiments were instituted in sealed tubes which bear strikingly upon this subject, and which I now beg to place before the section. No. 1.—In this experiment distilled water was boiled in a tube and a piece of bright wire inserted. The tube was then sealed, after the air had been exhausted. It is now some months old, and it will be observed that there is comparatively no action. We are to infer, therefore, from this experiment, that at ordinary tempera- tures water is without the slightest action upon ironin vacwo. We all know how rapidly iron is oxidized in the presence of water containing air. No. 2 is iron sealed up in yacuo with Vartry water, and submitted to high- pressure steam at 30lbs. to the square inch. The action is sharp and well marked, the results being the production of ferric oxide in considerable quantities, and mag- netic oxide. The lattercan be recognised on applying a magnet outside the tube. The third tube was a similar experiment with pure water, containing 0:1 grain per gallon of nitrate of potassium. This also was sealed in vacuo. The results are almost identical with the second experiment, only that more magnetic oxide seems to have been formed. The fourth experiment was one in which a nitrite was substituted for the nitrate. Here nothing but ferric oxide was formed of a peculiar bright colour, and in scales. That the corrosion of the boiler plate mainly proceeds from the nitrogenous molecules, I think there can be little doubt. But the quantity of these acidulous radicals being very small, any of the alkaline preservations would remedy this corrosive action. If, however, neglected, these nitrogenous acidulous radicals would ine certainly lead to mischief, and therefore they are imminent sources of anger. 8. On a New Process of Photo-Chemical Printing in Metallic Platinum. By W. Wi1118s, jun. 519 Sucrion C.—GEOLOGY. PRESIDENT OF THE SECTION.—John Evans, D.C.L., F.R.S., F.S.A., F.G.8. THURSDAY, AUGUST 15, 1878. Mr. Joun Evans gave the following Address :— Iw opening the proceedings of this section, I cannot but call attention to the fact that the present is the third occasion on which the British Association has met in this city, its first meeting here having taken place in the year 1835, or forty- three years ago. On that occasion, as indeed for many years afterwards, the two distinct, though to some extent cognate branches of study, Geology and Geography, were classed in the same section, and its president was a man of wltom Trish science may well be proud, and who, I am thankful to say, is-still living to enjoy his well- deserved honours—the veteran geologist, Sir Richard John Griffith, the author of the first Geological Map of Ireland. It seems hardly credible that the construction of this map was commenced in the summer of 1812, or sixty-six years ago; but the records of the Geological Society of London testify to the more remarkable fact that Sir Richard Griffith was elected a fellow of that society in 1808—seventy years ago. Indeed, in 1854, when the Wollaston medal was awarded to the then Dr. Griffith, the president, the late Professor Edward Forbes, spoke as he said reverentially to one of the earliest members of the society, and to a geologist who appeared in print before he, the president, was born. It was well said on that occasion that the map lately mentioned was one of the most remarkable geological maps ever produced by a single geologist ; and I make no doubt that those who are at present engaged on the Geological Survey of this island will testify, as did reed to the value of this “surprising monument of observation and skill. When speaking of the Geological Survey of Ireland, it will not, I am sure, be thought out of place if I offer here a tribute of respect to the memory of one who was originally a student in the college within whose walls we are assembled, and who subsequently occupied posts of the highest importance in connection with the Geological Society of Dublin and the Geological Survey of Ireland, besides filling the professorial Chair of Geology in this University : I mean Dr. Thomas Oldham, the late director of the Geological Survey of India. With the marvellous amount of work which he was enabled to accomplish in that country you are all acquainted, and you will all share in the regret that the period of his well-earned retirement— that“ requies optimorum meritorim”—should have been so quickly cut short by death. His name will, however, long survive, and future students of geology will have no difficulty in recognising the distinguished labourer in their science after whom the Cambrian Oldhamia of the Wicklow hills so worthily received its name. But to return to this Association. On the next occasion of its meeting in Dublin, in 1857, Section C. had become devoted to geology alone, and geography was excluded, the president being Lord Talbot de Malahide, a nobleman whom also we still have among us, and who is alike well known to archeologists and geologists. 520 REPORT—1878. As the last meeting of the Association in this city took place twenty-one years ago, it would at first sight appear that in opening our proceedings I might with propriety dwell on the progress which has been made within that period in the development of the geology of Ireland. I must, however, remind you that it is only four years since the Association held its meeting in what I may almost call the neighbouring town of Belfast, when the accomplished chief of the Geological Survey in Ireland presided over this section, and delivered an address in which some of the more interesting features of the country, especially those of the volcanic district of the north-east of this island, were discussed. During the resent year, moreover, he has published his comprehensive work on the Physical eology and Geography of Ireland, which I commend to you as far more likely to call your attention to the characteristic features of the country and the latest discoveries with regard to its geology than anything I could compile. In addition to this, there has appeared during the present year another inte- resting volume, which records the impressions of a highly intelligent foreign geologist on visiting this country. I mean the ‘Aus Irland’ of Dr. Arnold yon Lasaulx, Professor of Mineralogy in the University of Breslau. For this volume, in which shrewd remarks on the country and its inhabitants are mingled with geological observations and valuable comparisons of the Irish formations with those of other countries, we are indebted to the meeting of the British Association having been held two years ago at Glasgow, which attracted the author to visit the British Islands. So much having lately been published upon the geology of this country, I shall content myself with making a very few general observations with regard to it, and propose subsequently t9 touch briefly on some of those questions which, within the last twelve months, have occupied the attention of those who are engaged in the advancement of our science. As to the geology of this country, I may observe that we are here assembled just on the edge of that great central plain which forms so important a feature in the map of Ireland, and which stretches from Dublin Bay on the east coast to Galway Bay on the west, with hardly a portion of it attaining to an elevation of three hundred feet above the sea, over a tract of country nearly one hundred and fifty miles in extent in almost every direction. The boundaries of this great plain and those of the Carboniferous Limestone almost coincide, so that we have here the somewhat remarkable feature of a forma- tion which in England is of such a character as to have received the name of the Mountain Limestone, constituting in the neighbouring island nearly the whole of the plain country. In some of the north-western counties, however, as for instance Fermanagh and Sligo, it assumes its more mountainous character. Nearly the whole of this central plain is overlain with boulder clay, limestone gravel or middle drift, and extensive bogs, so that the subjacent rock is but occasionally seen. In several places detached bosses of Old Red Sandstone rise through the limestone, and there is also good reason for believing, with Professor Hull, that the whole of the area was at one time covered with the upper members of the carboniferous group, including the true coal measures, of which unfortunately but small patches remain, and those upon the margin of the plain. From the absence of the upper Paleozoic, Mesozoic, and Oainozoic formations over the area, Professor Hull has arrived at the conclusion that the surface remained in the condition of dry land, while that of England was being submerged beneath the waters of the sea, over the bed of which nearly all these formations were deposited. To a certain extent, however, he leaves it an open question whether some of the Mesozoic strata which occur over the north-east of Ireland may not have been deposited over the centre and south. The amount of denudation over this central area has, no doubt, been such that the chances of even Professor Judd finding traces of these latter deposits appear at first sight to be but small; but whether the whole of this vast amount of denudation is due to the wasting influence of rain, rivers and other sub-aérial agents of erosion, is a question which I venture to regard as at all events open to discus- sion. It appears to be the case that in some parts of the north of Iveland the whole of the upper Carboniferous beds had been denuded before the deposition of TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION C. 521 any Permian strata, as these are deposited immediately on the Carboniferous Lime- stone ; and if this amount of denudation had taken place in pre-Permian times in the north, there seems a possibility of the same having been the case in central Ireland. If so, it is possible that some traces of the later deposits may yet be found on the central plain. Certainly, if we are still to regard the white chalk asa deep-sea deposit, the cretaceous rocks of the north-east of Ireland must have at one time extended farther south than they do-at present, and somewhere or other there must have been shore deposits of that period formed further south than the Upper Greensand of Antrim. The careful investigations of Professor Judd have largely extended our knowledge of the Secondary rocks of the western coast and islands of Scotland, and he has been able to show that the Jurassic series of the Western Highlands could not have had a thickness of less than three thousand feet. It is therefore hard to believe that with such a development in so closely neighbouring a district, the deposits of the same age in Ireland can have been restricted to their present area. ; Professor Judd considers that the amount of denudation in the Scottish High- lands since the Mesozoic and even the Miocene period has been enormous, and that the great surface features of the Highlands were produced in Pliocene times. It seems therefore possible, if not probable, that so long a period of exposure to sub- aérial influence as that assigned to the central plain of Ireland by Professor Hull, would have resulted in a more uneyen land surface than that which we now find. At all events, the history of this remarkable physical feature is one which is of high interest, and can hardly as yet be considered as closed. With regard to the mountainous districts surrounding the central plain, we shall, I believe, have the opportunity of visiting some parts of the Wicklow Mountains, a district from which a portion, at all events, of the native gold of Treland was procured in ancient times, as indeed it continues to be. Of the abundance of gold in this country in early times, a glance at the magnificent col- lection of ancient ornaments preserved in the Museum of the Royal Irish Academy will serve to give an idea. Even in times more recent than those in which the bulk of these ornaments were made, gold was an important product of this country, and Iam tempted to quote a few lines from an early English poem, ‘ The Libell of Englishe Policye,’ witten in the year 1436. In treating of the commodities of Treland, the author says that the country is “So large, so gode, and so commodious That to declare is straunge and merveilous. For of silver and gold there is the ore Among the wilde Irish, though they be pore ; For they ar rude and can theron no skille So that, if we hadde ther pese and good wille, To mine and fine and metal for to pure In wilde Irishe mighte we find the cure; As in Londone saith a jewellere Which broughte from thennes gold oor to us here, Wherof was fined metal gode and clene, That at the touch no better coude be sene.” Sir William Wilde has observed that the south-western half of Ireland has yielded a greater amount of gold antiquities than the north-eastern, and probably this would hold good with regard to the production of the metal itself, though it has been found in the counties of Antrim, Tyrone, and Derry, as well as in those of Dublin, Wicklow, Wexford, and Kildare. The north-east of Ireland possesses, however, another geological feature peculiar to itself in that great expanse of volcanic beds which formed the subject of Pro- fessor Hull’s address to this section at the Belfast meeting. My only object in now mentioning them is again to call attention to their containing the only remains of a Miocene flora which are to be found in this island. Analogous beds were detected in the corresponding basalts in the Island of Mull by the Duke of Argyll in 1851. With the exception of the Hempstead beds of the Isle of Wight, 522 REPORT—1878. which should probably be classed as Oligocene, and the Bovey Tracey beds of Devonshire, these are almost the only deposits of Miocene age in the British Isles. The contrast presented by the scarcity of deposits of this period in Britain with their abundance in the north-west, centre, and south of France, Switzerland, and generally in the south of Europe, is striking. Instead of thick deposits covering hundreds of squaré miles of country, like the Miocene beds bordering the Pyrenees or those of the great system of the Auvergne, we have small patches owing their preservation either to volcanic outbursts having covered them up, or to some favourable circumstance having preserved them from total denudation. Whether we are to assume, with the late Professor Edward Forbes, that the general dearth of these strata in the British Isles arose from the extent of dry land which pre- vailed during the long interval between the Eocene and Pliocene periods, or whether we assume the former existence of widespread marine deposits which have since been entirely removed, the case is one not without difficulty. At all events, the absence of representatives of this period within the British area has a tendency to prevent a due appreciation of the enormous extent of the Miocene period being generally felt in this country. Nor, generally speaking, do we, I think, take a fair estimate of the remoteness in time to which we must date back the commencement of that lengthened period. Professor Haughton, judging from the maximum ob- served thickness of each successive deposit, has calculated that a greater interval of time now separates us from the Miocene period than that which was occupied in producing all the Secondary and Tertiary strata from the Triassic to the Miocene epoch, and, without endorsing the whole of my accomplished friend’s conclusions, T incline to concur in such an estimate. When it is considered that the Ballypalidy beds of Antrim and the Lough Neagh clays are the sole representatives in Ireland of two periods of such length and importance as the Miocene and Pliocene, their high interest will be more apparent, and I trust that no opportunity of minutely studying them will be neglected. ‘ There is one other point with regard to Irish geology on which it will be well to say a few words, though it is of a negative rather than a positive character. I mean the absence, so far as at present known, of Palzolithic implements in this country. It is true that Professor Hull, in the book to which I am so much indebted, speaks of araised beach on the Antrim coast as containing worked flints of that rude form and finish known as Paleolithic ; but this is a slip of the pen, by which the author has fallen into the not uncommon error of applying a terin which is merely significant of the age of the implements to their external character. However rude may be the workmanship of the flint implements found at Kilroot, they belong to the Neolithic, and not to the Palolithic period. So far as I am aware no example of any implement belonging to the age of the mammoth, rhinoceros, and other mem~ bers of the post-pliocene fauna has as yet been found in Ireland. Indeed, the remains of Elephas primigenius and its associates are of exceedingly rare occurrence in this country, though they have been found with those of bear and reindeer in the Shandon Cave near Dungarvan. It is, of course, impossible to foretell what future researches may bring to light; but judging from analogy it seems hardly probable that until ancient river-grayels containing the remains of the post-pliocene group of mammals are found in this island, veritable Paleolithic instruments will be discovered. The association of the two classes of remains is so constant that we may fairly assume that the animals formed the principal food of the Paleolithic hunters, and that any causes which lead to the absence of the one class will lead to the absence of the other also. There is, however, one member of that old quaternary group which is far more abundant in Ireland than it is in England or on the continent of Europe—the megaceros—which has rightly received the appellation of Hibernicus. I hope that we may have an opportunity, under the guidance of Mr, Richard Moss, of seeing some of the remains of this “antlered monarch of the waste ” in the position in which they were originally interred, and it will be an interesting question for consideration whether these remains can be regarded as of the same geological age as those of the English caves and riyer-gravels, or whether they do not for the most part belong to what Professor Boyd Dawkins has termed the Pre- TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION C. 523 historic period. It seems by no means improbable that this gigantic stag survived in this country for ages after he had become extinct in other lands, and that the view held by Professor Hull of his extinction being due to persecution by man is correct. If this be so it would seem to follow that the human occupation of Treland is of far more recent date than that of the sister country. ; And this brings me to one of those questions which have of late been occupying the attention of geologists. I mean the date which is to be assigned to the imple- ment-bearing beds of Paleolithic age in England. Dr. James Geikie has held that for the most part they belong to an interglacial episode towards the close of the Glacial period, and regards it as certain that no Paleolithic bed can be shown to belong to a more recent date than the mild era that preceded the last great sub- mergence. His follower, Mr. Skertchly, records the finding of Paleolithic implements in no less than three interglacial beds, each underlying boulder clays of different ages and somewhat different characters—the Hessle, the purple, and the chalky boulder clay. This raises two main questions, first, as to how far Dr. Croll’s theory of the great alternations of climate during the Glacial period can be safely maintained ; und secondly, how far the observations as to the discovery of implements in the so-called Brandon beds underlying the chalky boulder clay can be substantiated. Another question is how far the Paleolithic deposits can be divided into those of modern and ancient valleys, separated from each other by the purple boulder clay, and the later of the two older than the Hessle beds. It would be out of place here to discuss these questions at length. I will only observe, that in a considerable number of cases the gravels containing the implements can be distinctly shown tobe of much later date than the chalky boulder clay, and that if the implements occur in successive beds in the same district, each separated from the other by an enormous lapse of time, during which the whole country was buried beneath incredibly large masses of invading ice, and the whole mammalian fauna was driven away, it is a very remarkable circumstance. It is not the less remarkable because this succession of different Paleeolithic ages seems to be observable in one small district only, and there is as close a resemblance between the instruments of the presumedly different ages as there is between those of admittedly the same date. I have always main- tained the probability of evidence being found of the existence of Man at an earlier period than that of the post-glacial or quaternary river gravels, but, as in all other cases, it appears to me desirable that the evidence brought forward should be tho- roughly sifted and all probability of misapprehension removed before it is finally accepted. In the present state of our knowledge, [ do not feel confident that the evidence as to these three successive Paleolithic deposits has arrived at this satis- factory stage. At the same time it must be borne in mind that if we make the Palzolithic period to embrace not only the river gravels but the cave deposits of which the south of France furnishes such typical examples, its duration must have been of vast extent. In connection with the question of Glacial and Interglacial periods, I may mention that of climatal changes in general, which has formed another subject to which much attention has of late been given. The return of the Arctic Expe- dition, and the reports of the geological observations made during its progress, which have been published by Captain Fielden, one of the naturalists to the Expe- dition, in conjunction with Mr. De Rance and Professor Heer, have conferred additional interest on the question of possible changes in the position of the poles of the earth, and on other kindred speculations. Near Discovery Harbour, abot latitude 81° 40’, Miocene beds were found containing a flora somewhat differing from that which was already known to exist within the Arctic regions, ‘The Grionell Land lignite,” say the authors of the report, “ indicates a thick peat moss, with probably a small lake, with water lilies on the surface of the water, and reeds on the edges, with birches, poplars, and taxodiums on the banks, and with pines, firs, spruce, elms, and hazel-bushes on the neighbouring hills.” When we consider that all of the genera here represented have their present limits at least from twelve to fifteen degrees farther south, while the taxodium is now confined to Mexico and the south of the United States, such a sylvan landscape as that 524 REPORT—1 878. described seems entirely out of place in a district within six hundred miles of the pole, to which indeed, if land then extended so far, these Arctic forests must have also extended in Miocené times. Making all allowance for the possibility of the habits of such plants being so changed that they could subsist without sunlight during six months of a winter of even longer duration, I cannot see how so high a temperature as that which appears necessary, especially for the evergreen varieties, could have been maintained, assuming that Grinnell Land was then as close to the North Pole as it is at the present day. Nor is this difficulty decreased when we look back to formations earlier than the Miocene, for the flora of the secondary and Paleozoic rocks of the Arctic regions is identical in character with that of the same rocks when occurring twenty or thirty degrees farther south, while the corals, encrinites, and cephalopods of the carboniferous limestone are such as, from all analogy, might be supposed to indicate a warm climate. The general opinion of physicists as to the possibility of a change in the posi- tion of the earth’s axis has recently undergone modifications somewhat analogous in character to those which, in the opinion of some geologists, the position of the axis has itself undergone. Instead of a fixed dogma as to the impossibility of change, we find a divergence of mathematical opinion and variations of the pole differing in extent, allowed by different mathematicians who have of late gone into the question, as for instance the Rey. J. F. Twisden,* Mr. George Darwin,t+ Pro- fessor Haughton,t{ the Rey. E. Hill,§ and Sir William Thomson.|| All agree in the theoretical possibility of a change in the geographical position of the earth’s axis of rotation being affected by a redistribution of matter on the surface, but they do not appear to be all in accord as to the extent of such changes. Mr, Twisden, for instance, arrives at the conclusion that the elevation of a belt twenty degrees in width, such as that which I suggested in my presidential address to the Geological Society in 1876, would displace the axis by about ten miles only ; while Professor Haughton maintains that the elevation of two such continents as Europe and Asia would displace it by about sixty-nine miles; and Sir W. Thomson has not only ad- mitted, but asserted as highly probable, that the poles may have been in ancient times “ very far from their present geographical position, and may have gradually shifted through ten, twenty, thirty, forty, or more degrees without at any time any perceptible sudden disturbance of either land or water.” Tam glad to think that this question, to which I to some extent assisted to direct attention, has been so fully discussed, but I can hardly regard its discussion as being now finally closed. It appears to me doubtful whether eventually it will be found possible to concede to this globe that amount of solidity and rigidity which at present it is held to possess, and which to my mind at all events seems to be in entire disaccordance with many geological phenomena. Yet this, as the Rey. O. Fisher J has remarked, is presupposed in all the numerical calculations which have been made. I am also doubtful whether, in the calculations which have been made, sufficient regard has been shown to the fact that a great part of the exterior of our spheroidal globe consists of fluid which, though of course connected with the more solid part of the globe by gravity, is readily capable of readjusting itself upon its surface, and may, to a great extent, be left out of the account in considering what changes might arise from the disturbance of the equilibrium of the irregular spherical or spheroidal body which it partially covers. It appears to me also possible that some disturbances of equilibrium may take place in a mysterious manner by the redistribution of matter or otherwise in the interior of the globe. Captain F. J. Evans,** arguing from the changes now going on in terrestrial magnetism, has suggested the possibility of some secular changes being due to internal, and not to external causes; and if it be really true that there is a difference between the longest and shortest equatorial radii of the earth, amount- ing to six thousand three hundred and seventy-eight feet,tt+ such a fact would appear * Quart. Jour. Geol. Soc., 1878, p. 35. + Proc. R. S., vol. xxv. p. 328. Phil. Trans., elxvii. p. 271. } Proc. R. 8., 1877, 1878. § ‘Geol. Mag.,’ June, 1878. || Rep. Brit. Assoc., 1876, p. 11. { ‘Geol. Mag.,’ July, 1878. ** Nature, May 16, 1878, +t Thomson and Tait, Phil. p, 648. “sre TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION C. 625 a to point to a great want of homogeneity in the interior of our planet, and might suggest a possible cause for some disturbance of equilibrium. I have mentioned Professor Haughton among those who, from mathematical considerations, have arrived at the conclusion that a geographical change in the position of the axis of rotation of the earth is not only possible but probable. In a recent paper, however, he has maintained that, notwithstanding this possibility or probability, we can demonstrate that the pole has not sensibly changed its posi- tion during geological periods. He arrives at this conclusion by pointing out that in the Parry Islands, Alaska and Spitzbergen, there are Triassic and Jurassic de- osits of much the same tropical character, and then by a geometrical method fixing the north pole somewhere near Pekin, and the south pole in Patagonia, within seven hundred miles of a spot where Jurassic ammonites occur, shows that such a theory is untenable. In the same way he fixes the pole in Miocene times near Yakutsk, within eight hundred miles of certain Miocene coal beds of the Japanese islands. These objections are at first sight startling, but I think it will be found that if, instead of drawing great circles through certain points, we regard. those points as merely isolated localities in a belt of considerable width, there is no need of fixing the pole of either the Jurassic or the Miocene period with that amount of nicety with which Professor Haughton has ascertained its position. The belt may indeed be made to contain the very places on which the objection is founded. Still the method is a good one, and I hope that as our knowledge of foreion geology extends it may be still further pursued. There is, however, one farther consideration to be urged, and that is as to the safety of regarding all de- posits of one geological period as contemporaneous in time. Although an almost identical flora may be discovered in two widely-separated beds, it appears to me that chronologically they are more probably of different ages than absolutely contemporaneous; and, inasmuch as the duration of the Miocene period must have been enormous, there would be time—if once we assume a wandering of the poles—for such wandering to have been considerable between the beginning and end of the period. I must not, however, detain you longer upon this phase of geological specula- tion, but will advert to a subject of more practical interest, the discovery of Paleozoic rocks under London. So long ago as 1856 the Kentish Town boring had shown that immediately below the Gault red and variegated sandstones and clays occurred, which Professor Prestwich regarded as probably of Old Red or Devonian age. The boring of Messrs. Meux and Co. has now shown that under Tottenham Court Road, at a depth of little more than nine hundred feet from the surface, there are true Devonian beds, with characteristic fossils, and that Mr. Godwin-Austen’s prophecy of the existence of Paleozoic rocks at an accessible depth under London has proved true. Professor Prestwich, from a consideration of the French and Belgian coal-fields, inclines to the belief that in the district north of London carboniferous strata may be found. Unfortunately the expense of conducting deep borings, even with the admirable appliances of the Diamond Boring Company, is so great that I almost despair of another experimental bore- hole like that carried out in the Wealden district under the auspices of Mr. Willett, being undertaken. In the department of theoretical geology I would call your attention to some experiments by M. Daubrée, of which he has given accounts at different times to the French Academy of Sciences. In these experiments he has attempted to re- produce on a small scale various geological phenomena, such as faulting, cleavage, jointing, and the elevation of mountain chains. Although the analogy between work in the laboratory and that on the grand scale of nature may not in all cases be perfect, yet these experiments are in the highest degree instructive, and reflect no little credit on the ingenuity of the distinguished chief of the Ecole des Mines. With regard to recent progress in paleontology, I must venture to refer you to Professor Alleyne Nicholson’s inaugural address lately delivered to the Edinburgh Geological Society, but I cannot pass over in silence the magnificent discoveries in North America, which are principally due to the researches of Professors Marsh, Leidy, and Cope. The diceratherium, a rhinoceros with two horns placed trans- 526 REPORT—1878. . versely, and the dénoceras, somewhat allied to the elephant, but with six horns arranged in pairs, are as marvellous as some of the beasts seen by Sir John Maundevile on his travels, or heard of by Pliny. But perhaps the most remark- able series of remains ever discovered are those which so completely link the existing horse with the eoheppus and orohippus, and still farther extend the pedi- gree of the genus eguus, which had already been some years ago so ably traced by Professor Huxley. Of these American discoveries, as well as those made in the Tertiary beds of Europe, M. Albert Gaudry has largely availed himself in his recent beautiful volume on the links in the animal world in geological times, a work which will long be a text-book on the inter-relation of different orders, genera, and species, I am tempted to make use of some portions of M. Gaudry’s own analysis of the book, which he communicated to the Geological Society of France. Beginning with the marsupials of the close of the Secondary and beginning of the Tertiary period, he shows that they are succeeded by such animals as the pterodon, the hyenodon, the proviverra, and arctocyon, which present a mixture of marsupial and placental characters, and to some extent justify a theory of the transition from one order to the other. He next examines the marine mammalia, and points out that, so far as at present known, they make their appearance later than those of the land, and that the examination of the pelvis of the halitheriwm tends to support the idea of the mammals, such as the sirenians, which at the present day have no hind limbs, being descended from terrestrial quadrupeds, for those limbs in the halitherium are much less reduced than in its recent successors, the dugong and manatee. After tracing the numerous links which are to be found between the extinct and living pachydermata, he proceeds to show that, notwithstanding the great distance between them and the ruminants, transitions may be seen. The earliest ruminants were devoid of horns and antlers, but possessed upper incisors, and by a comparison of the molars of different genera it may readily be conceived how the large bosses of the omnivorous teeth of the pachyderms gradually shaded into the small crescents of the teeth of the ruminants. At the same time the passage from the heavy and complicated extremities of the limbs of the pachyderms to the simpler and lighter feet of the ruminants can be traced. The history of the horse family is also discussed, and the descent of existing proboscidians from the mastodonts is shown to be probable, though the previous forms from which the mas- todonts and dinotheria are derived are as yet unknown. Nor can the origin of the carnivora as yet be suggested, though passages between the six existing families of the order may be observed. In conclusion, M. Gaudry devotes a chapter to the uadrumana, and thinks that palsontological observations tend to diminish the isolation in which these mammals now stand with regard to the other orders. One of the most important features insisted on by M. Gaudry is that to which I have already alluded—the development of the complicated molars of most mammals. His view is that by a comparison with early and with foetal forms the probability may be shown of these compound teeth being made up of what in earlier forms were simple teeth—or, as he has termed them, denticules—which have coalesced in’ the same manner as have some other parts of the normal bony skeleton. In the compound teeth the denticules in some cases preserve their original conical form, as in the pig tribe ; in others are elongated transversely, so as by their junction to form ridges, as in the tapirs; while in others, again, they are drawn out into longitudinal crescents, as in the ruminants. Between these forms there are, of course, innumerable transitions. They do not, however, appear to me to affect the importance of M. Gaudry’s observations, which must ie regarded as of the highest value in all attempts to trace the inter-relation of different forms of mammalian life. I must not, however, detain you longer on this subject, as I trust that I have said enough to show the importance and interest of this book. The discoveries of early forms of birds with teeth do not come within M. Gaudry’s province; but Professor Marsh has largely added to our knowledge of these remarkable forms. The Tertiary Odontopteryx toliapicus from Sheppey, described by Professor Owen, seems rather to be endowed with bony tooth-like processes in the jaw, than with actual teeth, and the head of the Arg:ornis from TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION C. 52a the same locality is at present unknown. But the Hesperornis and Ichthyornis from the cretaceous beds of America possess veritable teeth, in the one case set in a long groove in the jaw, and in the other in actual sockets. Such intermediate, or, as Professor Huxley would term them, intercalary forms, tend materially to bridge over the gap which at first sight appears to exist between reptiles and birds, but which to many palzeontologists was far from being impassable, long before the discoveries just mentioned. The amphiccelous character of the vertebrm of ichthyornis presents another most remarkable peculiarity, which is also of high significance. I hear rumours of the discovery of another archeopteryx in the Solenhofen Slates, which is said to present the head in a much more complete con- dition than that in which it occurs on the magnificent slab now in the British Museum. As yet, I believe, the jaws have not had the matrix removed from them; but should they prove to be armed with teeth, it will to me be a cause of satisfaction rather than surprise, as confirming an opinion which some fifteen years * I ventured to express, that this remarkable creature may have been endowed with teeth, either in lieu of or combined with a beak. I must not, however, detain you longer with any of these general remarks, which are, moreover, becoming somewhat egotistic, but will now proceed to the business of this Section, in which I hope that more than one paper of great value and interest will be forthcoming. ‘The following Papers were read :— 1. Sketch of the Geology of the Environs of Dublin. By Professor HE. Hutt, F.R.S. 2. On the Ancient Volcanic District of Slieve Gullion. By Josupa Noway, M.R.LA., §¢c., of H.M. Geological Survey of Ireland. Slieve Gullion is a somewhat isolated mountain situated some few miles north of Dundalk, and west of ‘the picturesque hilly country lying between the bays of Dundalk and Carlingford. The rocks which mainly compose it are massive dolerites and elvanites, which have been erupted through granite of Lower Silurian age. From evidence obtained in a neighbouring locality, there is every reason to believe that the period of this eruption was about the close of the Palozoie epoch. On the west and south of the mountain the elvanite forms a remarkable dyke-like ridge, when it changes in its character from a granitoid rock to a felstone porphyry. Simultaneously with this change, suggesting conditions of less intense heat and pressure, a remarkable fragmental rock makes its appearance. It is here almost altogether composed of granite pieces; so much so that it might be taken for a disintegrating condition of that rock, but that the base is not crystalline. Its mechanical character is confirmed on tracing the ridge further, where the granite gies place to Silurian slates and grits. Here there is a mixture of slate and granite ragments, and still further in the slate district it is almost altogether composed of slate débris. At all these places the fragmental rock is intimately associated with the porphyry, so that where both are’well exposed in sections it is impossible to draw any line of demarcation between them, the lower part of the former gradually acquiring the character of the latter, by the appearance in increasing quantity of fragments of porphyry, until it ultimately passes into that rock. That we have here something analogous to volcanic agglomerate we can scarcely entertain a doubt. Nevertheless, it differs very much from the usual type of that _ rock, as it is, except in the deepest portions, mainly composed of pieces of non- volcanic rocks, those pieces being of the crust through which the igneous mass was posed, and varying accordingly ; granite agglomerate prevailing in those portions ormerly occupied by that rock, a mixture of slate and granite near the boundary of these formations, and slate fragments almost exclusively in the Silurian country to the south-east. It is impossible to account for these phenomena by supposing * Nat. Hist. Rev., vol. v. p. 421. 528 REPORT—1878. that we have here the result of an ordinary eruption, where lava is ejected, and we are forced to believe that it was altogether aériform. From the great extent of country over which the agglomerate occurs, it is not improbable that the explosion which accompanied the protrusion of the nearly horizontal dyke affected a con- siderable area at the same time, disrupting and triturating to powder the overlying rocks, the vast volume of which, falling back into the opening, together with the rapid consolidation of the igneous mass consequent upon so great a disengagement of the interstitial vapour, combined to check the volcanic activity before it could produce scoriz or lava. Another point of interest in connection with this district is the evidence it affords of the connection between the plutonic and the volcanic rocks, This is not indeed as fully exemplified here as in other districts, as, for instance, in the Western Isles of Scotland, where Professor Judd traces all the gradations from granite to pumice and scoriz, yet it is sufficiently illustrative of the principle when we find plutonic rocks graduating into others which by their protrusion have produced me- chanical accompaniments. 3. Notes on the Glaciation of Ireland, and the Tradition of Lough Lurgan. By W. Martiev Wiis, F.R.A.S., F.0.8.* In comparing the vestiges of ancient glaciation (especially those of Norway and Ireland) with the deposits of existing Alpine glaciers, the author has been much impressed with the very general fact that, although the “till” and other varieties of boulder clay are of unquestionable glacial origin, they are unrepresented by the moraines, &c., of the glaciers now existing in the temperate zones; and on the other hand true representatives of recent Alpine moraines are very rarely found among the ancient glacial deposits. An explanation of this is offered. Living Alpine glaciers (with a few ex- ceptions) terminate on mountain slopes, and are sources of mountain torrents. These torrents wash out, carry away, and afterwards deposit as a distinct alluvium the material corresponding to the clayey matrix of the ancient drift, leaving behind only the boulders and smaller stony particles to form the stony heaps of modern moraines. The remarkable absence of such moraines on the very long and remarkably glaciated coast line and mountain slopes of Scandinavia is explained by the fact that the glaciers of that region originated ina great nevé, covering the table-land fjelds which overflowed down their boundary valleys into the sea. The great central plain of Ireland is compared to such a fjeld. During the glacial epoch it was covered with ice, was a great mevé or glacier source, and its outlet glaciers flowed on all sides over the surrounding mountain barriers down their seaward slopes into the ocean and terminated there, leaving the bulk of their mineral burdens in the sea. Glaciers thus outthrust upon the waters under a climate in which the annual snowfall exceeded the annual thaw, would be thinned from below and grow from above, and thus extrude their mineral matter downwards instead of upwards, as in Alpine temperate-zone glaciers. ‘ They would present a further inversion of such glaciers, by bending upwards by flotation as they advanced, instead of downwards by gravitation ; and their ere- vasses would therefore be formed at the lower instead of the upper surface of the ice, and would gape downwards instead of upwards. As they became thawed below by the friction of their advance they would accumulate a vast amount of débr7s at their base, effecting far more erosion than the clearer ice-bottom of modern Alpine glaciers. Thus, more fine slimy im- palpable powder or clay material would be formed, and this, in its slimy condition, * The views of the constitution of ancient glaciers, and the formation of boulder clay, contained in this communication, are more fully discussed in a paper on ‘ The Great Ice Age and the Origin of the Till,’ published in the ‘Quarterly Journal of Science ’ of April, 1877. TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION C. 529 gravitation. But as it thinned out, this pressure must have gradually diminished until it became ni, when the depth of water and thinning of the ice effected approximate flotation. Then the mud, &c., would be deposited, and the shallowed sea would form a submarine plain of the neutral depth over which the glacier would just lightly slide and thus form a striated pavement of till. If the conditions remained constant, this deposit would continue level as we see it at Bodé and other places in Norway ; but if climatic or other conditions fluctuated, the varying advance and recession of the glacier and its varying pressure would produce a ploughing up of the soft material into submarine ridges such as abound in the Irish bays that are mouths of the great glaciated valleys, and are also found so abundantly on and near the coast. The islands of Clew Bay are specified as striking examples of this. Having lately met with an account of a tradition which describes a great fresh- water lake on the present site of Galway Bay, and having already noted many of these long ridges of till in that Bay, the author revisited Galway with the object of further examining them in reference to the tradition which states that the fresh- water lake was converted into a bay by the sea breaking through the boundary or bar that had previously separated the fresh from the salt water. The general result of this exploration of both shores of the Bay and several of its islands was, that the existence of such a barrier or of a series of such barriers appears very probable; but their position does not indicate so large a lake, as the Ee ronery Lough Lurgan which is described as one of the three great lakes of reland. The outermost barrier probably stretched from the cliffs of Barna (which are formed by the sea washing away one of these ridges of till and exposing a fine perpendicular section about 50 feet thick) to Aghinish Point, meeting the Kilcro- gan promontory on the way, when this ridge of drift extended much farther west- ward, as its present truncated headland of till indicates that it must have done. , These, and other minor headlands of till, all the obvious remains of promontories that have been cut off, are connected by a bar that stretches obliquely and irregu- ae across the Bay from Barna, in County Galway, to Finvarra Point, in County ; are. The promontories and island ridges do not extend fairly. across the Bay, but lie in a direction from E.N.E. to W.S.W. They are still so numerous and extensive as to visually overlap each other and present the appearance of an inner bar, en- closing the inner bays of Galway and Kinvarra. This occurs when they are viewed from the shore of Salthill, about 2 miles from Galway. A minor bar is well seen from the railway on leaving Oranmore station on the way to Galway. The till cliff of Roscarn Point is there seen opposed to a similar cliff on the opposite side with a channel cut between them. If the ancient barrier was nearly as high as the present cliffs of Barna, the waters of the traditionary lake must have backed over a large area of the flat land around Galway, and it may even have been continuous with Lough Corrib. Another form of drift which covers a large area of the central limestone plain _ of Treland is described as analogous to that which covers the Dovrefjeld, the Fille- j fjeld, and most of the other Norwegian fjelds, and which the author has described in detail in ‘Through Norway with Ladies,’ pages 50 and 238, as the material _ which subsided when the great nevé of the Great Ice Age finally thawed away. It is neither boulder clay nor loose stony moraine material, but an intermediate agglomeration of sand and gravel with boulders that are more angular than those of moraines or boulder clay, and show little or no signs of striation. The name of boulder sand or glacier gravel is suggested. It cccurs, commonly as a thin layer spreading over the limestone and occasionally as long humpy ridges, and _ is connected with the formation of Eskers. ¢ , would be thrust forward so long as the glacier exerted considerable pressure by its are WY 1878. MM 530 REPORT—1878. 4, Notice of some additional Labyrinthodont Amphibia and Fish from the Coal of Jarrow Colliery, near Castlecomer, County of Kilkenny, Ireland. By Wiut1am Heuer Batny, F.L.8., F.G.S., MRLA., Sc. Acting Paleontologist to the Geological Survey of Ireland. The Geological Survey having recently acquired a number of specimens from Jarrow Colliery, near Castlecomer, through the kindness of Mr. J. Dobbs, the pro- prietor, and Mr. A. McLuckie, manager of the colliery, consisting of amphibian reptiles and fish, in addition to those previously collected from the same colliery, at the request of Mr. Hull, Director of the Survey. The following short descrip- tion of these interesting specimens was given by Mr. Baily. This series of fossils consists of more than 50 specimens, all belonging to the vertebrata, 25 of them being amphibia, 20 fish, and the remainder of doubtful character. The largest amphibian is one already described by me as Anthracosaurus Edget in a paper read before the Royal Irish Academy, January 18, 1875. These remains indicate an animal which must have been from eight to ten feet in length; they consist of a triangular-shaped head, under jaw, and other portions of the skull, not however in a good condition for study, together with a group of twelve well-defined vertebree and ribs in much better preservation than those before obtained. The other amphibian remains I have identified with the following genera and species, described by Professor Huxley in the ‘Transactions of the Royal Irish Academy, vol. xxiv. (Science), pp. 851, &c. :— Keraterpeton Galvani, of which there are four specimens. Ophiderpeton Brownriggw, two specimens. Dolichosoma Emerson, three specimens. Erpetocephalus rugosus, one specimen. There are others evidently amphibian, including two heads, which I have not yet succeeded in identifying ; possibly some of them may belong to one or both of the two genera alluded to by Professor Huxley, but not figured, under the names of Dichospondylus and Brachyscelis. The fish remains include a fine example of what I believe to be Megalichthys Hibberti. This great sauroid is here represented by a specimen three feet seven inches in length, the extremity of the tail being deficient. Another fine fish, referred to the genus Celacanthus, appears to be allied to C. granulatus Agassiz, hitherto confined to Permian strata, only the caudal ex- tremity having previously been known. The skeleton of this fish is very complete, its length being 22 inches, and breadth at commencement of ventral fin six inches. In this collection there are also some groups of ribs and other bones, which corre- spond with those of a large fish from the same colliery, named Campylopleuron by Professor Huxley, but which may possibly be identical with the fish we have referred to Megalichthys Hibbert. Several specimens of the defence spines of cestraciont fish, Gyracanthus formosus, Ag.,* and a single palatal tooth of Ctenodus, complete the list of fish which have been identified. There are also several detached bones and fragments in this collection of vertebrate remains at present undetermined. * G. formosus and G. tuberculatus I believe to be identical, as suggested by Agassiz. Rie. a id mos TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION C. 531 FRIDAY, AUGUST 16, 1878. The following Papers were read :— 1. On the Exploration of Kent's Cave. Fourteenth Report. See Reports, p. 124, 2. Sizth Report on the Victoria Cave Settle.—See Reports, p. 377. 3. Report on Fermanagh Caves—See Reports, p. 183. 4. Fourth Report of Commission on Underground Waters. See Reports, p. 382. 5. The Relative Ages of the Raised Beaches and Submerged Forests of Torbay. By W. Penaewty, F.R.S., F.G.S., Se. Near Hope’s Nose and Berry Head, the northern and southern horns of Torbay, Devonshire, there are fine examples of a raised beach about 30 feet above the level of the existing tidal strand; whilst along.the central shores of the bay, at Tor Abbey, Paignton, Godrington, and Broad Sands, there are exposed at low water, more or less frequently, considerable accumulations of clay, with stumps of trees rising vertically, and having roots and rootlets ramifying through the mass. In short, Torbay presents admirable studies of the raised beaches and submerged forests found so frequently at intervals along the entire coasts of Deyon and Cornwall, and affords evidence, so far at least as the bay is concerned, that during the formation of the beach the country was about 30 feet lower than at present, whilst at the time of the forest growth it was not less, but may have been much more, than 80 feet higher than now; and that, in each case, the move- ment was so uniform and so tranquil as not to destroy or to modify the approxi- mate horizontality of the areas. It has always been admitted that the beaches and the forests cannot have been coeval; and there has been a prevalent but not an ° unchallenged belief that the beaches are the older. The object of this paper is to afford proof, through evidence hitherto overlooked, of the correctness of this chronology. The parish of Paignton, forming the central shore of the bay, is terminated on the north-east by a narrow gulley, through which a rivulet reaches the sea. At this point the sea cliff is no more than 20 feet high; as it extends towards the south-west it gradually reaches 55 feet, and thence, with a gentile declivity, it descends to within a foot or two of the sea-level, at about -25 mile from the rivulet. Beyond this, the coast for a considerable distance is a sandy plain, covered with greensward a very few feet above high-water level. The cliff just mentioned consists of two zones; the lowermost being the well-known Trias of South-Eastern Devon, whilst the uppermost belongs to a much more recent formation. MM 2 532 REPORT—1878. A study of the upper zone shows that the materials are remarkably angular, and consist of fragments of grit derived from Devonian beds at no great distance ; that they are very loosely aggregated, have no approach to a stratified arrange- ment, but lie with their longest axes at all angles to the plane of the horizon; that the accumulation—never more than a few feet thick—is thinnest where the cliff is highest; that the contour of the surface on which it lies is very much the same as that of the present surface; and that stones so prevalently angular and so lacking in arrangement could never haye been subjected to the rolling and assorting power of the sea; in other words, that the accumulation is of sub-aérial origin. When, however, the Torbay raised beaches were formed, and the country was 30 feet lower than at present, the greater part of the Paignton cliff was submarine; hence the bed of angular stones must have been lodged in its present place at a period subsequent to the elevation of the beaches. On following the coast towards the sandy plain on the south-west, the bed of angular stones passes under a bed of clay. This superposition, distinct and unmis- takeable, is exposed for a distance of nearly 400 feet; and the clay, occupied with stumps and roots of large trees, is finally covered with a thick accumulation of peat, traceable, especially after violent gales, in all directions, and to the low-water line; forming, in short, a well-marked remnant of the Torbay Submerged Forest. The clear superposition proves, beyond a doubt, that the period of the forest growth was subsequent to that of the formation of the bed of angular stones, which, as already shown, was in its turn subsequent to the era of the elevation of the beaches. The facts show, moreover, that since the beach era the Torbay district has never been at so low a level as it was at that time. 6. Experiments on Filtration of Sea Water through Triassic Sandstone.* By Isaac Roserts, F.G.S. 7. On the New Geological Map of India. By V. Batt, M.A., F.G.S. The last occasion when the subject of the geology of India was prominently brought before this Association was during the meeting at Dundee in 1867, when the late lamented Dr. Oldham described the general features and sequence of for- mations as then known. To his memory a just tribute has already been paid by the President of the Section and Professor Hull. Of him, on the occasion of his leaving India, it was well said by the present Superintendent of the Survey, Mr. H. B. Medlicott, F.R.S., ““ Where he has sown others have reaped.” Since the year just alluded to considerable progress has been made, and the map now exhibited shows the state of our knowledge up to a twelvemonth ago, when it was sent to press. From its small scale of 64 miles to the inch it is but little more than an index, and merely indicates the limits of the principal forma- tions. For large tracts of India, however, maps, showing the minor details and subdivisions already exist. Some idea of the magnitude of India may be gathered from the fact that a portion of country equal to Ireland, big as it looks on the map opposite on the scale of one inch to a mile, would make but an inconsiderable gap were it removed from the map of India. This map is intended to illustrate a manual of the geology of India, which is now being prepared by the two senior members of the Survey, Messrs. Medlicott and Blanford. The publication of this work, which will take place towards the end of the present year, will, it is expected, place Indian geology on a more stable and externally intelligible footing than it has hitherto enjoyed. In Europe it is hoped to prove the means of enlisting the interest and critical aid of geologists in elucidating many of the peculiarly perplexing questions connected with the subject * Incorporated in the Report on ‘ Underground Waters.’ See Reports, p, 397. TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION C. 533 of homotaxis. In India it is hoped that the work will incite local amateurs to aid our small staff. In former times much good yeoman’s service was done by amateurs, whose observations were incorporated in Greenough’s well-known map. But in the India of to-day it would be difficult to name half a dozen amateur geolo- gists. The causes of this scarcity of volunteers are not difficult to explain. There is now more pressure from official duties, and the facilities for making short runs to Europe during periods of relaxation are vastly increased. The details of the geology of India are far too complicated to be disposed of in a speedy review like the present. The more especially as some of our palzeontolo- gists have attempted to establish minute correlation of horizons with those recog- nised and established in Europe. Hence have arisen what are known as “ paleeon- tological contradictions”—the marine fawnas, where existing, not always pointing to the same conclusions as the floras. Broadly speaking, it may be said that there are two geologies in India—that of the Himalayas and adjoining tracts, and that of the Peninsula proper. The former conforms in general characters with that of Europe, but the latter is very much swi generis, unlike, at least as regards many of the formations, the geology of any other well-known tract on the earth’s surface. It is on this account that a duplicate arrangement of the index has been found to be necessary. The author then gave a brief description of the principal Peninsular forma- tions, and pointed out their leading characteristics and probable correlation with European rock systems. He indicated on the map the position of the principal coalfields, and stated that the total area of actual coal measures was possibly not less than 30,000 square miles. The position of the coalfields in reference to that of many of the large cities was most*unfortunate, and as regards the southern and western parts of India native coal was generally undersold by English and Australian. Regarding the Talchir boulder bed, he was anxious to retract an early opinion of his which had recently been quoted by the President of the Geological Society of London. The glaciation of some of the boulders since found was as distinct as it was on the boulders exhibited to the meeting by Mr. Williams in connection with his paper on the glaciation of Ireland. And recently, as also on a former occasion some years ago, he had come upon a boulder deposit in the Talchir series, which was full of masses of Vindhyan quartzite which must have been carried for 50 or 60 miles from the nearest possible source, and had in all probability been ice borne. With some remarks on the nature and distribution of laterite, the author con- cluded his brief sketch. 534 REPORT—1878. SATURDAY, AUGUST 17, 1878. » The following Papers were read :— 1. On the supposed Radiolarians and Diatoms of the Carboniferous Rocks. ° By Professor W. C. Wittiamson, IBS. At the meeting of the British Association in 1872, Mr. Carruthers described some small objects to which he gave the generic name“of Traquairia, and which he concluded were Radiolarian skeletons. A characteristic series of these objects having been obtained .by the author, he felt compelled to reject Mr. Carruthers’ determination as to their nature. They are small spherical bodies, from which Pa ject numerous slender and apparently muricated branching prolongations, which have at a superficial glance the appearance of spines, but which were shown to be something very different. The entire sphere is encased in a structureless membrane, of which the supposed spines are tubular, thin-walled, cylindrical extensions, and which in turn give off numerous symmetrically-arranged tubular branches, which probably ramified in a mucilaginous (?) investment. Within this outer membrane were one or two other capsular membranes, the innermost of which was found, in several examples, to be filled with cells that bore every indication of being vege- table tissues, being absolutely undistinguishable from similar cells found in the interiors of macrospores, and of cryptogamic sporocarps found associated with the Traquairie. These combined features led the author to regard the germs as belonging to the vegetable rather than to the animal kingdom, and to represent a cryptogamic form of reproductive structure. The author further described the minute organisms found in some of the moun- tain limestones of North Wales, and which have been regarded as Radiolarians by some geologists. These appear to be wanting in true Radiolarian characteristics, but most of them seem rather to have been hollow, calcareous spheres. It is the opinion of Professors Roscoe and Schorlemmer that the substitution of carbonate of lime for silica in these organisms is a most improbable occurrence, and one that can only be deemed possible in the case of organisms whose originally siliceous com- position is beyond the reach of doubt—which is very far from being the case in the instances referred to. Some time ago, Count Castracane announced a discovery of numerous remains of marine and fresh-water Diatoms in the siliceous ash remaining after coal had been subjected to certain chemical processes, of which the Count recorded the method. Dr. Roscoe permitted Mr. Smith, one of his able assistants, to make for the author similar preparations of thirty examples of Yorkshire and Lancashire coals, prepared according to Count Castracane’s directions, in Dr. Roscoe’s labora- tory, under the eye of that distinguished chemist. There is every guarantee for the - correctness of these preparations, but none of them exhibit the least traces of Diatomaceous structures. Hence the author concludes that, so far as his experience enables him to judge, there are as yet no evidences of the existence of either Radiolarians or Diatoms during the Carboniferous age. 2. On some Fossils from the Northampton Sands. By Joun Evans, D.C.L., F.R.S., Se. These fossils from the ironstone beds of Duston, near Northampton, are casts of lithodomous borings originally made in lumps of coral, impressions of which TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION C. 535 they still bear on their outer surface. In the interior, the presence of the shells is still to be traced. Their history appears to be that the cavities made by the boring shells were first filled with lhmonite, subsequently converted into carbonate of iron and eventually into hematite. Last of all, the enclosing coral has been entirely removed by the infiltration of water charged with carbonic acid. This last process has probably taken place since the emergence of the beds from below the sea-level. The Northampton sands have been fully described by Mr. Samuel Sharp, F.G.S., in the ‘Quart. Journ. of the Geological Society.’—Vol. xxxiy. 3. Notes on some new species of Irish Fossils, By Witi1aM HELwier Batty, F.LS., F.GS., MRLA., §c., Acting Palwontologist to the Geological Survey of Ireland. A new species of starfish was described by the author of this paper, under the name of Palasterina Kinahani, from Lower Silurian strata of Caradoc-Bala age, rocks on shore near Bannow, county of Wexford; also two new species of Cepha- lopod shells from Carboniferous limestone, under the following names— Goniaties Leesont, townland of Tomdeely South, county of Limerick; Orthoceras Clarkii, townlands of Doohyle South and Doohybeg, county of Limerick. 536 REPORT—1878. MONDAY, AUGUST 19, 1878. The following Papers were read :— 1. On the Metamorphic and Intrusive Rocks of Tyrone. By Josren Nowan, M.R.LA., §c., of HM. Geological Survey of Ireland. The rocks described in this paper occupy the central parts of County Tyrone, extending from Omagh eastwards and north-eastwards towards Slieve Gallion. They consist for the most part of anamorphous green hornblendic rock, in the midst of which is a wide lenticular tract of micaceous gneiss and schist. The author shows that these two classes pass gradually into each other, and that even among the amorphous hornblendic rocks traces of schistose structure can generally be observed, while local transitions into schist frequently occur. Gradations into more crystalline rocks were also noted and, described, those of a hornblendic cha- racter passing into a felspathic variety in which little or no hornblende occurs, while quartz and orthoclase are developed, so that a coarse quartz porphyry is pro- duced, passing ultimately into granite. It was also shown that some of the granite was intrusive during the period of the Old Red Sandstone and its association with metamorphic rocks of Lower Silurian age explained on the hypothesis that the intrusive granite was due to re- metamorphism at the later period, so that portions of the already crystalline rocks were completely fused and became irruptive. That metamorphic action in this district continued up to and even after the Old Red Sandstone age seems to have been the opinion of the late General Portlock, who in his ‘ Geological Report on Londonderry with Parts of Tyrone,’ &c., has described these rocks and their relations to each other at considerable length. He did not seem to haye considered the granite to be intrusive, but merely a metamorphosed condition of what we now call the Lower Carboniferous Sandstone, which was then classed with the Old Red formation. 2. On the Origin of Crystalline Rocks. By T. Sterry Hunt, F.R.S. 3. On some New Areas of Pre-Cambrian Rocks in North Wales. By Henry Hicks, M.D., F.GLS. In addition to the areas of pre-Cambrian rocks already described by the author, he now includes amongst that ancient group the following, which he has recently explored, accompanied by Professor Torell, of Stockholm, and Mr. Tawney, of Cambridge, and during part of the time by Professor Hughes, of Cambridge, and Dr. Sterry Hunt, of Montreal. 1. Some cupriferous schists with their associated green bands (intrusive green- stone of the Survey), and including Robel Fawn, to the north of Dolgelly. 2. The so-called ‘intrusive felspathic porphyries and Greenstone breccias,’ in the neighbourhood of Pwllheli. 3. The so-called intrusive syenitic (Rhos Hirwain Syenite) and felsitic masses and the associated schists which together form the extremity of the promontory of Caernaryonshire, and also Bardsey Island. 4, The so-called ‘intrusive felspathic porphyries’ in the neighbourhood of Llanfihangel and Nevin. TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION C. 537 5. The granite and felstone of the Eifel range, and some masses of felstone to the north. 6. The so-called ‘altered Cambrian,’ to the south of Glyn Clifon. 7. The ridge of granite and the whole of the so-called altered Cambrian rocks in Anglesea. In these areas it was found that the rocks resolved themselves into three very well-defined groups, and as the author had already recognised that these groups formed part of three distinct formations at St. David’s, unconformable on one another, he proposed to divide the rocks of North Wales in the same manner. The lowest beds are like his Dimetian at St. David’s, and consist chiefly of granite or granitvid gneiss rocks. The next in ascending order is the great felsitic group, and for this he proposes the name Arvonian,* since it forms so large a part of the mountains in Caernarvon- shire. The third includes most of the so-called altered Cambrian beds, and consists chiefly of schists, or schistose rocks, and is usually a highly chloritic group. This he associates with the Pebidian of St. David's. 4. On “ Cervus Megaceros.” By Wi.t1am WILLIAMS. The “ Cervus Megaceros,” commonly called the “ Irish Elk,” whose remains often occur in the marl beds under the peat bogs of Ireland, appears to have been drowned by miring in the stiff clay forming the beds of lakes which were once very numerous in the country, but which have since silted up, and are now occupied by peat bogs. The author, having been engaged for ten weeks making excavations in search of these remains in the Bog of Ballybetagh, ten miles from Dublin, had arrived at the following conclusions—Ist, that the animal had lived after the first glacial epoch, as he found the remains resting on the lower boulder clay; 2nd, that the clay in which he found them seemed to indicate a temperate climate, as it was mostly com- posed of vegetable matter, indicating very little degradation of mineral matter from the surrounding hills ; 3rd, the clay last mentioned is covered with a bed three feet thick, containing hardly any vegetable matter, it being almost all mineral. He concludes that this bed of clay was produced by ice action degrading and wearing down the hills. That it is glacial he infers— 1. From its texture, it being ground granite, 2. From its quantity ; an ordinary mild climate would not wear down the hills _ to produce such a bed, and as it is at a level of 800 feet it has not been imported from the drainage of other places. 3. From haying found a reindeer’s antler in this bed, he infers that a sub-arctic climate must have prevailed at time of its deposit. 4, From the broken state in which the antlers are found, he cannot conceive any force which would have been sufficient to break one of these beams of hard sound bone three inches in diameter, unless the vertical pressure of immense masses of ice, while the antlers were embedded in the lower clay; running water could not do it; for the teeth have not their corners broken off, nor are the tracks of the blood-vessels in the antlers ground off or water worn. Hence he infers that the animal lived after the deposit of the lower boulder clay, and previous to that of the upper boulder clay, or that it lived inter-glacial and may have been exterminated by the last ice period. 5. On the Rocks of Ulster as a Source of Water-Supply. By Wim A. Tran, M.A.0, HM. Geological Survey of Ireland. The author referred to the backward state of the study of hydro-geology in Ire- land, and to the acknowledged necessity for larger and purer supplies of water for * From the Roman name Azvonia, and from which the present name of Carnarvon is derived. 538 REPORT—1878. many towns in Ulster. In too many cases the present supplies were derived from the uncertain and dangerous sources of shallow-surface wells, situated within the habitable area—sources universally condemned as scarcely possible to be free from pollution. The two great systems of water supply were contrasted—that by catchment basins with reservoirs, and that by deep wells or borings. The author strongly advocated the latter, where geological formations would warrant a trial. He showed that many towns in England were successfully supplied by artesian wells or borings into the Chalk or New Red Sandstone formations. The rocks of Ulster were then reviewed with. special reference to their suitability for rendering water by boring, and the best localities for such operations enumerated. Among the formations which did not possess the essential conditions necessary for success were mentioned the Lower Silurian rocks which comprise the greater portion of the counties of Down, Louth, Armagh, and Monaghan, and the granitic tracts of Newry, Slieve Croob and Mourne, in which localities the catchment basin system had to be adopted, as was the case for the Newry water supply. In the same category were placed the granitic and metamorphic tracts of Done- gal and West Londonderry. The New Red Sandstone—in England one of the chief formations in which to * bore for water—occupies in Ulster a very limited surface area, being for the greater part overlaid by other formations. Artesian borings in these rocks had proved successful, as at the ‘“Cromac Springs” in Belfast, while in other cases they had been unsuccessful, from a wrong selection of sites. The Chalk and Hibernian Greensand formations were shown to be the great water-bearing strata of Ulster, occupying a very extensive area in the counties of Antrim and Londonderry, but overlaid by other formations, such as the Tertiary basalts. The Mesozoic rocks form a geological basin, the basaltic area occupying the centre, with the Chalk and Greensand cropping out almost continuously along its margin, and underlaid by the plastic clays of the Lias or Keuper marls. The occurrence of this basin was clearly demonstrated by the elevations and dip of the chalk around its margin, and its deep-seated existence inside, as at Templepatrick and other places. The presence of large quantities of water in the Cretaceous beds was apparent everywhere, from the number of large springs along the outcrop, and the constant outpouring of water where the lip of the basin was low, resulting in frequent landslips, as at Garron Tower, Carnlough, Glenarm, Whitehead and other places. ; The existence of water held under hydrostatic pressure within the basin was. as evidenced by the numerous large perennial springs occurring in the basaltic ateau. The sequence of the formations within this area and the occurrence of water- bearing strata were then enumerated. Below the so-called upper basalt there exists the first great water-bearing stratum at the ferruginous lithomarge bed of the iron-ore measures. For potable purposes it is too highly charged with hydrated oxide of iron. The lower aluminous hed is also water producing, of a purer quality, but less plentiful ; the districts where these occur are, however, compara- tively small. By boring through the overlying basalt within this extensive basin the chalk and greensand could readily be pierced—if within the area of the lower basalt, at no great depth—and where, undoubtedly, a plentiful and pure supply of water would be obtained. The districts where such, with every prospect of success, might be attempted would be approximately along the valley of the river Bann, or near Ballymena, Ballymoney, Coleraine or Antrim. The districts of Cookstown, Dungannon and Moneymore were differently situated geologically, but the formations were fayour- able, and water had been proved in the bore-holes for iron ore in that neigh- bourhood. The author strongly advocated, for certain localities in Ulster, the adoption of deep wells or borings for the purpose of obtaining water supplies. TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION C. 539 6. On the Occurrence of certain Fish Remains in the Coal Measures, and the Bvidence they afford of their Fresh-water Origin.* By Janus W. Davis, F.G.S., L.S., Hon. Secretary of the Yorkshire Geological and Poly-~ technic Society. A few miles south-west of Leeds, in the district of Morley and Adwalton, there is a bed of cannel coal which is extensively wrought. It occurs about 150 yards above the silkstone or blocking coal; the latter forming the base of the middle coal measures in the West Riding of Yorkshire. An average section of the bed of cannel or stone coal is as follows :— Feet Inches Timpure canniel ..........ssccscsscverescesncceresccecnsescneseeess 0 1 WinminellConlrewccrccssacserssosces Ppsoocosee CCUneE DC UDRELce Deas 0 6 Impure cannel............-00+0 Ncccddscvuiseativesedncss+csc¥esss 0 2 Wirtiec.doecereneesseicceesess ss riedceeutea coadctoeecesocatcccseneuctes 0 2 COMMNONY COR sc cccsciccesesedessttriesccoesoesetucseticcen sos enone 0) 3 Slightly impure cannel .............sseeeeerseeeeeeeeeeeee eens 0 5 Slacks Sal Otsaeteesacccceas ac datacees veddodees aececeeesesoasesc 0 3 In the cannel coal, and more numerously in the impure cannel above and below it, there occur numerous fossil remains of fish. They consist of both elasmo- branchs and ganoids, but by far the most common are specimens of Colacanthus lepturus, Ag. The extent and seeming method of deposition of the cannel coal— viz., in a series of small inland lakes, at times dried up, and at others more or less filled with water—taken in conjunction with the internal anatomy of the Ccelacanthus and the frequent occurrence of the fossil bones of Labyrinthodonts,, lead to the inference that these swampy pools were very similar to thoséfound in Africa and Australia at the present time, where Lepidosiren and Ceratodus inhabit their muddy beds, and during the dry season, when the ponds and streams are dried up, are enabled, by the action of a lung-like air-bladder, to exist either out of the water or buried in the mud until the rainy season again enables the fish to breathe in the ordinary manner by gills. The Ccelacanthus are similarly pro- vided with a swim bladder, whose walls have been erroneously described as osseous, which, so far as can be ascertained, served an exactly similar purpose to that of the Lepidosiren now existing. These facts, together with others cited in the paper, oint to the conclusion that the strata were of subaqueous, and in all probability freshwater origin. 7. On the Discovery of Marine Shells in the Gannister Beds of Northumberland.t By G. A. Lezour, F.G.S. The author described the circumstances of the find, which took place in the first instance near the village of Whittonstall, in South Northumberland, at the begin- ning of the present year (1878). He then adverted to some hitherto unrecorded previous observations of marine forms in the Lower Coal Measures in the neighbour= hood of Wylam and Prudhoe, by Mr. G. C. Greenwell, F.G.S. The species altogether were the following :— A, from Whittonstall (four localities) : Aviculopecten papyraceus. Av, sp., two forms not sufficiently well preserved for specific determination. Orthoceras sp., a small elegant form. Encrinite stems, decomposed in every case. * Published in full in the ‘Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological and Poly-~ technic Society ’ for 1878. . ‘ -+ The subject will be found treated more fully in the author’s ‘ Outlines of the Geology of Northumberland.’ London and Newcastle, 1878. 540 REPORT—1878. B, from Wylam and near Prudhoe: Ca sp quoted from memory by Mr. Greenwell. Mr, Lebour then described the Gannister beds of the district, discussed their relations to the overlying and underlying members of the Carboniferous series, and concluded that, north of the Tees, the lines defining the division stratigraphically were purely arbitrary. 8. Report on proposed Kentish Explorations—See Reports, p. 380.’ 9. Report on Fossils of N. W. Highlands of Scotland.—See Reports, p. 130. : : : : TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION C. 541 TUESDAY, AUGUST 20, 1878. The following Papers were read :— 1. On the Influence of ‘‘ Strike” on the Physical Features of Ireland. "By Epwarp T. Harpmay, F.C.8., F.R.G.S.L., Geological Survey of Ireland. Although not often mentioned in geological works, the influence of “ strike” in determining the lines of direction of the principal physical features of a country is recognised by most geologists, but in few countries is the relation so distinctly shown as in Ireland. The author was led to pay attention to this subject on reading Mr. J. F. Campbell’s paper ‘On the Glaciation of Ireland,’ * in which that gentleman assumes that the south-west and north-east trend of some of the mountains of Ireland is due to the glacial action of a huge ice sheet passing over Treland from the south-west of Scotland. After some years’ examination, how- ever, the author has found that in most cases the trend of the hills, and course of rivers, &c., are determined by the strike alone; and he now wished to place the facts noted before the section :— (1) Mountains.—The Donegal highlands trend to the south-west, along the line of strike of the ancient crystalline stratified rock. The basaltic plateau of Antrim follows in outline the windings of the outcrop of the underlying chalk, and, conse- quently, the strike of the basalt upheaved with it. The Mourne Mountains and Slieve Croob also coincide in direction with the stratified rocks on their flanks, except where joints or faults have given rise to minor lateral valleys, e.g. Car- lingford Lough. Adherence to the line of strike is also seen in the hills forming the flanks of the Wicklow Mountains, in the Kilkenny and Tipperary coal-tields, the Comeragh and Knockmealdown Mountains, and is most remarkably shown in that series of flexured carboniferous, old red sandstone, and Silurian rocks forming the hills of Cork and mountains of Kerry, the axes of which stretch from Dun- garvan (Co. Waterford) to Cape Clear and Bantry Bay. Its influence is again shown in the shaping of the high ground forming the Munster coal-field, and finally in the mountainous district of Connemara; although here, in places, obscured by the action of faults. The Twelve Pins, Muilrea, the mountains flanking Killarney harbour, and the country northwards around Nephin Mountain are striking examples. Towards the central plain the isolated mountains of old red sandstone and Silurian rocks rising through the carboniferous limestone, viz., the Slieve Bloom Mountains, the Devil’s Bit, and the Galtees, conform to the same rule, the axis in strike and direction being parallel. (2) Rivers.—In the North of Ireland especially, many of the rivers follow the windings of the strike. The Suir follows the line of strike for eighty miles, only beginning to cross it about ten miles from the sea. The Blackwater runs along the strike for seventy miles of its course, crossing it for only sixteen miles. The Lee is directed by the strike for some fifty miles of its length, as is also the Bandon River for the greater part of its course, while the Shannon may be traced along the strike of the beds for by far its greatest distance. (8) Inland Lakes.—Most of the lakes are conformable to the strike in their ereater outline, the smaller details being determined by the jointing. Of these may be mentioned Lough Neagh, Loughs Corrib and Mask, Lough Erne (most notably), Lough Allen, Lough Derg, and the far-famed Lakes of Killarney. (4) Sea Loughs, Bays, §c.—The majority of these may be included :—Lough Foyle, Belfast Lough, Strangford Lough, Lough Larne. The most notable ex- amples are those in the south-west :—Roaring Water Bay, Dunmanus Harbour, * ¢ Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc.,’ London, May 1872, 542 REPORT—1878. Bantry Bay, Kenmare River, and Dingle Bay; also the mouth of the Shannon, Galway Bay, and Clew Bay. Further north the principal bays and indentations along the line of coast stretching from Broadhaven to Donegal—Killala Bay, Sligo Bay, and Donegal Bay—have been excavated in their great outlines along lines of strike. In conclusion, the author pointed out that nature had adopted the least expen- sive method of working, since it is always easier to excavate along a line of strike than across the bedding. Usually cleavage, or incipient cleavage, is induced along the line of strike by the forces which upheaved the rocks, and denudation is most easily effected therefore in that direction. 2. On Hullite, a hitherto wndescribed Mineral; a Hydrous Silicate of pecu- liar composition, from Carnmoney Hill, Co. Antrim, with Analysis. By Epwarp T. Harpman, F.C.8., H.M. Geological Survey. With Notes on the Microscopic Appearances, by Professor E. Hutt, M.A., F.R.S. Part I,—This mineral occurs in abundance at Carnmoney Hill, near Belfast, in the basalt forming the old neck of a Miocene volcano. It has never been described or analysed, and has been referred to on the survey maps, and labelled in the survey collection as Obsidian, doubtless from its black colour and waxy lustre. In physical character it somewhat agrees with the Chloropheite of Macculloch, but is entirely different in composition, which more resembles that of Delessite. From this, however, it differs essentially in colour, hardness, streak, and specific gravity. It appears, on the whole, to belong to the ferruginous-chlorite group, however. Physical characters.—Colour, velvet black. Hardness, about 2. Brittle. Lustre, waxy, dull; streak olive brown. Before blowpipe, with difficulty fusible ‘at edges to a black glass, which in some specimens is magnetic. Very slightly affected by strong acids, but decomposed when boiled in the powdered state in strong H.Cl. Occurs, filling amygdaloidal cavities in the basalt of Carnmoney Hill, near Belfast, and Shane’s Castle, Lough Neagh. Chemical composition compared with that of Delessite and Chloropheite :— Hullite | Delessite* | Chlorophoeitet Sistas S10 peansides «taigsatanee sole -oieeyieanosay satan 39°437 31:07 33°30 (Adnminn, AdiOaiasstsctess excesses rset avadesi 10°350 15°47 = Peroxide of Iron, Fe,O, ............0000+ 20720 17-54. =e. Protoxide of Iron, FeO.................0008 3°699 4:07 26°70 Protoxide of Manganese, Mn0O............ trace a 42s Teamne AO BW sanep sees va noniiesnds one ee foe. onde 4-484 19:14 — Magnesia, MgO .......seccseseeeeseeeeeeeeees 7474 0:46 — IW ietet pln ON oo -aseb-d00+veeecessenneonensnecs 13618 11°55 40:00 Waxbome Acid OO) oi isse-ccccseeseoscee. traces — == 99°782 100:00 100:00 a — | FeSiO, + 6H,O Sip MCE) oe et ae tceashe oo vAQitUEE. 1-76 2°39 2-02 It will be noticed that there are striking differences in the composition of the new mineral from the others. The large amount of water in Chlorophzite, and the fact that it appears to have been obtained by difference, seems to throw some doubt on the analysis. It is difficult to express the composition of Hullite by a chemical formula. * Dana's, ‘System of Mineralogy,’ 1874, p. 497. + Ib. p. 410. Also Western Isles of Scotland. John Macculloch, M.D., p. 505. TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION C. 543 That given above does not agree with any known types of silicate. Supposing it to be a mixture of peroxide and silicate, we should get the formula— [H,M’”,0, + (M’,M’”,Si,0,,) +411,0], a mixture with a meta-silicate, on the type, H,,Si,0,,, corresponding with the tale and chlorite series. Or, supposing it to be a mixture of an aluminate, or ferrate, with a silicate, we get a formula not unlike that proposed for Ripidolite, WiZ.— [M’,Al,0, + M’”,H,Si,0,, + 4H,0], a part of the water being basic. Either of these formulas seems probable. Its low specific gravity and its resistance to the blowpipe are remarkable, con- sidering the large amount of iron. The author proposes to name this mineral Hullite, after Professor Hull, who has done much valuable work.in elucidating the microscopic mineralogy of the basalts of Ireland. Part Il.— Microscopic structure of the Basalt.—Professor Hull describes the microscopic appearance of the mineral, and of the rock in which it occurs. The basalt contains short prisms of augite imbedded in a paste of plagioclase felspar, a great deal of olivine, and the mineral described above in abundance. Under the microscope, the latter is of a dark amber brown colour, nearly opaque. It per- meates the whole rock, filling the interstices, and enclosing the other minerals. It does not polarize, and is, therefore, not crystalline, but assumes very much the character of amorphous chlorite, being apparently, like it also, a secondary mineral formed after the consolidation of the rock. The rock contains an abundance of olivine, not seen in such quantity in any other basalt of Antrim, and hardly ever so fresh and unaltered. In most cases the outer form only is preserved; but here it is as fresh as in the lavas of ’ Vesuvius. From this it might be inferred that the rock was comparatively recent, did we not know it to be older than the Glacial and Pliocene periods. 3. The Progress of the Geological Survey of Ireland. By Professor Epwarp Hutt, M.A., F.R.S., Director. (With the Sanction of the Director-General.) The author gave a short account of the progress of the Survey from its com- mencement in 1832, under the late General Portlock, R.E., down to the present day, stating that the whole country south of a line drawn roughly from Larne, on the coast of Antrim, to Sligo, had been surveyed, while 160 sheets of the geological map on a scale of 1-inch to the statute mile had been published. Along with these had also been issued 78 separate Explanatory Memoirs, describing the structure and paleontology of 126 sheets. It had also been found necessary to revise the geology of the Leinster and Tipperary Coal-fields, the Carboniferous trap-rocks of County Limerick, and the south-east portion of the country, including part of Wicklow and Wexford. The coal-fields of the North of Treland had also been surveyed, and published on maps both on the “ 6-inch” and “J-inch” scales; and it was also intended that the districts of County Antrim, containing the pisolitic iron ores, should be illustrated by maps on both scales. The tract still remaining to be examined included the greater portion of the counties of Donegal, Tyrone, Fermanagh, Sligo, and Antrim. 4. Report of the Committee on Erratic Blocks.—See Reports, p. 185. 544 REPORT—1878. 5. The Geological Relations of the Atmosphere. By T. Sturry Hont, DL.D., F.BR.S. The author began by noticing the inquiries of Ebelmen into the decomposition of rocks through the influence of the atmosphere, resulting in the fixation of car- bonic acid and oxygen, and discussed the question at length, with arithmetical data. He inquired farther into the fixing of carbon from the air by vegetation with liberation at the same time of oxygen both from carbonic acid and from the - decomposed water, the hydrogen of which with carbon forms the bituminous coals and petroleums. It was shown that the carbonic acid absorbed in the process of rock-decay, during the long geologic ages, and now represented in the form of car- bonates in the earth’s crust, must have equalled probably two hundred times the entire volume of the present atmosphere of our earth. This amount could not, of course, exist at any one time in the air; it would at ordinary temperature be lique- fied at the earth's surface. When came this vast quantity of carbonic acid which must have been supplied through the ages? The hypothesis of M. De Beaumont, who supposed a reservoir of carbonic acid stored up in the liquid interior of the planet, was discussed and dismissed. The gas now evolved from the earth’s crust from yoleanié and other vents was probably of secondary origin and due to carbo- nates previously formed at the surface. The solution of the problem offered by the author is based upon the conception that our atmosphere is not terrestrial, but cosmical, being a universal medium diffused throughout all space, but condensed around the various centres of attrac- tion in amounts proportioned to their mass and temperature, the waters of the ocean themselves belonging to this universal atmosphere. Such being the case, any change in the atmospheric envelope of any globe, whether by the absorption of the disengagement of any gas or vapour would, by the laws of diffusion and static equilibrium, be felt everywhere throughout the universe, and the fixation of car- bonic acid at the surface of our planet would not only bring in a supply of this gas from the worlds beyond, but, by reducing the total amount of it in the universal atmosphere, diminish the barometric pressure at the surface of our own and of all other worlds. This conception of a cosmical atmosphere of which our own forms a part is not new, but was put forth by Sir William R. Grove in 1848, and is developed in the very learned and ingenious work of Mr. Mattieu Williams, on ‘The Fuel of the Sun,’ and has lately been noticed by Dr. P. M. Duncan in its geological bearings, Ebelmen, in 1845, pointed out that the greater weight of an atmosphere charged with carbonic acid would increase the temperature due to solar radiation at the earth’s surface, and greatly modify atmospheric phenomena. ‘Tyndall, by his subsequent re- searches on radiation, showed that certain gases, in amount too small to affect con- siderably the barometric pressure, might influence powerfully climatic conditions, and suggested that in the former presence, in the atmosphere, of moderate quantities of a gas like carbonic acid might: be found a solution of the problem of the cli- mates of former geologic ages. According to the author, the amount of this gas, which, since the advent of life on our earth, has been subtracted from the univer- sal atmosphere,’ although it may not have sufficed to diminish by more than a small fraction the pressure at the earth’s surface, would account for all the con- ditions of geological history so far as temperature and climate are concerned. He maintains that while we have evidence of a warm or sub-tropical climate prevailing over the Arctic regions from the Carboniferous down to the Lower Oreta- ceous times, and a gradual refrigeration up to the temperate climate of the Miocene age, we had for the first time in the Pliocene age the evidence of Arctic cold, which, with some variations, has continued until now. Since that date geographical varia- tions have caused and may again cause local climatic changes of considerable mag- nitude; but no such changes could permit the existence, over continental areas within the Arctic circle, of such tropical vegetation as we know to have once flourished there. Geographical changes, as Dr. F. Campbell Dawson and others have so well pointed out, might lift large areas into the region of perpetual frost, and thus give rise to local glacial phenomena, and may, moreover, account for con- TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION C. 545 ‘siderable local climatic variations at the sea level since the Pliocene age. We cannot, however, account in this way for the warmer climates of previous ages, but must seek for their cause in the former constitution of the atmosphere. Touching the suggestion that former climatic changes were due to a displace- ment of the earth’s axis of rotation, the author expressed the opinion that it is irreconcilable with the fact, long ago insisted upon by him, that “the direction of the Arctic currents, which are guided by the earth’s rotation, appears, from the distribution of marine sediments, to have been the same since very early periods.” Dawson has reinforced this argument by recalling the fact that the southward mi- gration of successive floras shows, in like manner, that from the Devonian age the general courses of oceanic currents, and consequently the position of the earth’s axis, have not changed. 6. Report of Committee on the Conductivity of Rocks. See Reports, p. 133. 7. On the Saurians of the Dakota Cretaceous Rocks of Colorado. By Professor H. D. Corr. 8. Notes on Eribollia Mackayi, a New Fossil from the Assynt Quartzite in the North-Western Highlands of Scotland. By James Nicou, F.R.S.EF., F.G.S., Professor of Natural History in the University of Aberdeen. The remarkable fossils to which the above name has been given were found on the western shore of Loch Eriboll by Mr. Donald Mackay, of Portnacow, in a por- tion of the Assynt quartzite, or middle deposit of the west coast series of strata. On a small block (of 9 inches by 7) more than a dozen peculiar bodies are seen running down into the interior. They are mostly rounded and conical in form, and show a central core, covering about half the width, and enclosed in an outer wall. One of the most regular measures about 1} inch above, and 3} inches long to the point below. Others are smaller, but similar in form and structure. Some of them oceur single, but others are joined in twos or threes, and arranged as if in parallel rows. One of the largest, about 2 inches across, is more square in form, and does not taper as it descends. The single conical forms much resemble Orthoceratites, but show no trace of septe or partitions ; whilst the internal appearance and mode of grouping rather fnclines the author to regard them as corals, approximating, in form at least, to Cyathophyllide. A similar fragment, found some years ago in the quartzite at Ullapool, shows no structure when polished. As they differ very widely from any known organism, he has named them Eribollia, from the locality, Mackayi, from their discoverer. Some of the curious bodies, formerly described as casts of annelid tubes may, he thinks, also prove similar corals. From the Ullapool quartzite he has also a whorled shell (Macluria ?). The author in conclusion stated that he still adheres to his published views of the structure of the North-Western Hichlands. 9. On the Influence that Microscopic Vegetable Organisms have had on the Production of some Hydrated Iron Ores. By M. AupHonse Gages. Geologists are aware of the influence some microscopic animal living organisms have in the formation of bog irqn ore, resulting from the iron of surrounding decom- posing rocks, and also of the properties that the skeletons of these organisms com- Municate to the iron. 1878. NN 546 REPORT— 1878. There are also other deposits of iron ores, far more important, and which cover immense tracts of land, especially in the tertiary formations; many of them are remarkable for their purity, and are free from débris of former rocks. Under what influence were some of these so-called limonites, or brown hema- tites, formed? ‘This problem can, I believe, be more or less solved by the observation of a phenomenon going on in some of the large iron tanks holding Vartry water. We have in the College of Science, Dublin, a large iron tank on the roof of the house, into which a constant supply of water flows freely. After a certain lapse of time, the bottom of the tank and also the sides are covered with sponge-like concre- tions, assuming the various shapes of the well-known concretions of lime or iron ore found in various geological formations. The above sponge-like deposits are, in our case, nothing else but vegetable microscopic organisms— billions, I may say, of thread moulds, Penicillia. These organisms accumulate after many months to such an extent as to form an immense sponge intercepting the flow of water. Nevertheless, in the case of the pen tank, the water remains pure and pleasant to drink, and is without any taste of iron. These organisms have, I may say, assimilated the iron (as hydrated sesqui- oxide) and made of it a part of their constitution. During the process of life they have consumed the carbonic acid, and they leave as a last result, when dried in a water-bath, a pure ore of iron, containing a mere skeleton of carbon, and haying a formula corresponding to that of brown hematite. OO OR TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION C. 547 WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 21, 1878. ‘The following Papers were read :— 1. On the Age of the Crystalline Rocks of Donegal. By Professor W. Kine, D.Sc. 2. On the Correlation of Lines of Direction on the Globe, and particularly of Coast Lines. By Professor J. P. O’Rxitty. - The forces which have acted from the interior of the globe have been the most important of those which have produced the present distribution of land and water at its surface. Those forces are more essentially, contraction due to secular cooling, and gravi- tation. Furthermore, the mineral constitution of the earth’s crust has necessarily influenced the mode of action of those forces, and assuming that constitution to be homogenous, and to be represented by the lavas modern and ancient, we might expect that the contraction forms presented by those lavas when in great mass would represent the forms to which secular contraction gives rise at the surface of the earth, and that these would be limited by lines of direction presenting poly- gonal forms somewhat as the contraction forms of the older lavas (basalts and trachytes). Those lines of direction would represent the joints or fissures along which the interior forces have exercised their greatest action, that is, those lines which are represented on the globe by mountain chains. Now these influence notably the forms of the continents as represented by the present distribution of land and water. On the other hand, the boundaries of seas past and present have been and are simply coast lines determined by the intersection of the sea surface with the upraised strata, whose direction is essentially represented by that of the adjacent mountain chains, and of the system of fissures or joints forming their axes. Thus mountain chains and coast lines can be correlated. Having measured a series of blocks of basalt at the Giant’s Causeway, I have found that the dominating polygonal angle, or that one which most frequently occurs, is the angle 110°, and its supplement 70°; moreover, that the form presented by an isosceles triangle having 70° and 70° at the base, and 40° at the summit, is markedly present in the basalt columns of Fair Head. This form I had pre- viously recognised as continually occurring on maps, especially geological, and have thereon based a system of correlation of lines of direction. Adopting as line of departure, the direction of the Kast Coast of Madagascar, and taking this from Imray’s most recent chart, I have found that the creater number of lines of direction of coasts and mountain chains on the earth’s surface can be derived therefrom solely by the intervention of the angle 40° and its mul- tiples, and 70°, and as proof have transferred from the globe those lines to maps, both geographical and geological, and found such lines to be related with many others on the map through the intermediary of those angles, and that this law is general. Amongst the many maps which might be exhibited in proof thereof, I would mention Haidinger’s Geological Map of Austria, whereon occur marked lines of direction which can be most. distinctly reduced to this law, as also the maps of the Geological Survey of Great Britain and Ireland. NN2 548 REPORT—1878. 3. Concerning the Extent of Geological Time. By Rev. M. H. Cross, F.G.S. This paper was only intended to afford desired opportunity for wivd voce discus- sion on the above subject. Since geology has her own strong and unrefuted arguments for the great extent of geological time, it is not logically necessary for her to do more than to show, if it can be shown, that the physical arguments for the very inconvenient restriction thereof rest upon still unproved assumptions. The argument from the rate of cooling of the earth seems to have been satis- factorily shown by Mr. T. Mellard Reade to be quite inconclusive. The argument from the probable duration of the sun’s radiation of heat assumes, inter alia, that the original nebula from which the solar system was formed was cold, and-also that the unit of gravitation, relatively to the mass of that system, has been constant from the time when that mass began to fall together, and throughout the enormous interstellar distance which has doubtless been traversed by it since that time. Dr. Croll’s suggestion in answer to the former of these assumptions is logically suffi- cient as a reply to the whole of this argument. Nevertheless, it may be added, as to the latter assumption, that those physicists who have entered upon certain speculations as to the cause of gravitation cannot deny that it is perfectly credible, and even probable, that gravitation is not an essential accompaniment of matter, and that the unit of gravitation may not be constant throughout all time and space. The argument from the earth’s figure in connection with the retardation of her rotation by the ocean tides depends upon the doctrine of the steel-rigidity of the earth taken as a whole, as do also the calculations of various writers on subjects, which bear, in different ways, on the present one. However, Sir W. Thomson himself has greatly weakened the support of this doctrine. But geology (as regards the matter in hand) is not concerned to question it; although it is, at first sight, a difficulty. The results obtained by the Tide Committee of the Asso- ciation point to the conclusion that there is an 18°6 year-tide in the body of the earth depending upon the revolution of the moon’s nodes, and that the rigidity of the earth, even if it be, in one sense, as high as that of steel, is yet a viscous rigidity, by which she may yield almost indefinitely to sufficient long-continued straining forces. Other considerations confirm this latter position. This 18°6 year-tide, whether resulting from such viscosity proper, or from plasticity of a different kind, must cause a variation in the earth’s rate of rotation haying the same period. This variation would probably be sensible if looked for by: the astronomers, who would confer a boon on the geologists by endeavouring to detect it. Dr. John Evans’s suggestion of the possibly considerable mobility of the axis of rotation relatively to the body of the earth bears in certain ways on the present question; the mechanical objection to it, already greatly weakened by Rey. O. Fisher, might be quite removed by the investigation suggested.* 4. On the Harth’s Avis. By Rev. Professor Havcuton, M.D., F.R.S. 5. Geological Results of the late British Arctic Expedition. By Captain Frermpey, R.A., and Mr. De Rance. The author describes Laurentian gneiss of Cape Sabine, and the Cape Rawson beds of Grinnell Land; the overlying Silurian rocks; the Devonian rocks of Dana Bay; the Carboniferous Limestone of Feilden Peninsula, and the Miocene beds of Lady Franklin Bay; the Pleistocene deposits and glaciation of the coasts of Grinnell; and the method of formation of the Icefoot. He discusses the bearing of these results on what was already known on Arctic geology.t * See ‘Geological Magazine,’ Oct. 1878. t See ‘ Quart. Jour. Geol. Soc.’ vol. xxxiv. p, 556. Srction D.—BIOLOGY. PRESIDENT OF THE SECTION—Professor W. H. Flower, F.R.S., F.L.S., F.G.S. Department of Zoology and Botany. THURSDAY, AUGUST 15, 1878. Professor FLowrR gave the following Address, entitled :— A Century's Progress in Zoological Knowledge :— ‘ ‘On the 10th of January, 1778, died the great Swedish naturalist, Charles Linné, more commonly known as Linneus, a name which will ever be mentioned with respect and regard in an assembly devoted to the cultivation of the sciences of Zoology and Botany, as whatever may he the future progress of those sciences, the numerous writings of Linneus, and especially the publication of the Systema Nature, can never cease to be looked upon as marking an era in their development. That work contained a systematic exposition of all that was known on these subjects expressed in language the most terse and precise. The accumulated knowledge of all the workers at Zoology, Botany, and Mineralogy since the world began, was here collected together by patient industry, and welded into a complete and harmonious whole by penetrating genius. Exactly a century has passed since Linneus died. What of the progress of the subjects to which he devoted his long and laborious life? This one century is a brief space compared with the ages which have passed since man began to dwell upon the earth, surrounded by living objects, which have, more and more as time rolled on, awakened his curiosity, stimulated his faculties to observe, and im- pelled him to record the knowledge so gained for the benefit of those tocome. How does it stand in comparison which tkose which preceded it, in the contributions it has thus acquired and recorded ? It may be not without interest in commencing our work at this meeting to cast our eyes back and take stock, as it were, of the knowledge ofa hundred years ago, and of that of the present time, and see what advances have been made; to look at the living world as it was known to Linneus and as it is known to our- selves. The Systema Nature, the last edition of which, revised by the author, was published in 1766, will be a convenient basis for the comparison ; but as the subject is one which, even in a most superficial outline, might reach such lengths as would well tire out the most patient of audiences, and absorb time which will be more profitably occupied by the valuable contributions which are forthcoming from other members of the Association, I will merely take a small section of the work, about 100 pages out of the first of the four volumes, those devoted to the first class Mam- MALIA. The comparison of this part is perhaps the easiest, as the contrast is the least striking, and the progress has been comparatively the slowest. The knowledge of large, accessible, and attractive-looking animals had naturally preceded that of minute and obscure organisms, and hence, while in many other departments the advance has altogether revolutionized the knowledge of Linnzeus, in the Verte- 550 . REPORT— 1878. brated Classes, especially the one of which I shall now speak, it has only extended and reformed it. In taking the Systema Nature of Linnzeus, the comparison is certainly carried back somewhat beyond the hundred years which have elapsed since bis death, and the brilliant contributions to the knowledge of the Mammalia of Bution and Daubenton just then beginning to be known, and the systematic compilation of Erxleben (published in 1777), are ignored; but for the present purpose, especially considering the limited time at my disposal, it will be best not to go beyond the actual text of the work in question. Before considering systematically the different groups into which Linnzeus divides the class, I must remark in passing upon what is the greatest, and indeed most marvellous difference between the knowledge of Zoology of our time and that of Linnzeus. Now we know that the animals at present existing upon the earth are merely the survivors of an immensity of others, different in form, characters, and mode of life, which have peopled the earth through vast ages of time, and to which numerically our existing forms are but infinitesimally small, and that the knowledge we possess of an immense number of them, fully justifies the expecta- tion of an enormous further advance in this direction. In the time of Linnzus the existence in any past time of a species having no longer living representatives on the earth, though perhaps the speculation of a few philosophical minds, had not been received among the certainties of science, and at all events found no place in the great work we are now considering. In the twelfth edition of the Systema Nature we find the class MAMMALIA divided into seven orders: I. Primates, Il. Bruta, Ill, Fere, 1V. Glires, V. Pecora, VI. Bellue, VII. Cete. These orders contain forty genera without any intermediate subdivisions, The genera are again divided into species, of which the total num- ber is 220. The first order, Priwarss, contains four genera: Homo, Simia, Lemur, and Vespertilio. The vexed question of man’s place in the zoological system was thus settled by Linneus. He belongs to the class Mammalia, and the order Primates, the same order which includes all known monkeys, lemurs, and bats: he differs only ge- nerically from theseanimals. But then we must remember that the Linnean genera were not our genera, they correspond usually to what we call families, sometimes, to entire orders. So that practically man’s position is much the same as that to which, after several vicissitudes, as his separation as an order by Blumenbach and Cuvier, or as a subclass by Owen, he has returned in the systems of nearly all the zoologists of the present day who treat of him as a subject for classifica- tion upon zoological and not metaphysical grounds. Yet since the time of Linnzus the whole science of Anthropology has been created. There is certainly an attempt at the division of the species Homo sapiens into six varieties in the Systema Nature, but it has scarcely any scientific basis. Zoological Anthropology may be said to have commenced with Blumenbach, who, it is interesting to recall as an evidence of the rapid growth of the science, was @ contemporary with most of us in this room, for he died as lately as 1840, although his first work on the subject, ‘De generis hwmant varietate nativa,’ was published three years before the death of Linnzus, too late, however, to influence the work we are now speaking of. The scientific study of the natural history of man is therefore, we may say, but one century old. To what it has grown during that time you are probably aware. Scarcély an important centre of civilisation in the world but has a special Society devoted to its cultivation. It forms by itself a special department of the Biological Section of our Association—a department of such importance, that on this occasion no less distinguished a person than a former most eminent President of the whole Association was thought fit to take charge of it. From him you will doubtless hear what is its present scope, aim, and compass. I need only remind you that except the one cardinal point of the zoological relation of man to other forms of life, which Linnzeus appears to have appreciated with in- tuitive perception, all else that you will now hear in that department was not dreamt of in his philosophy. TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION D.—DEPT. ZOOLOGY AND BOTANY. 551 As might naturally be supposed, apes and monkeys have, for various reasons, attracted the attention of observers of nature from very early times, and conse- quently Linnzus was able to give rather a goodly list of species of these animals, amounting to thirty-three; but of their mutual affinities, and of the important structural differences which exist between many of them, he seems to have had no idea, his three divisions being simply regulated by the condition of the tail, whether absent, short, or long. We now know that the so-called Anthropoid or man-like apes, the gorilla, chimpanzee, orang, and gibbons, form a group apart from all the others of such im- portance, that everything related to their history, structure, and habits has been most assiduously studied, and there is now an immense literature devoted to this grou alone. Nothing could better illustrate the advances we haye made in a hundre years, than the contrast of our present knowledge of these forms with that of Linneus. It is true that, as shown in the most interesting story of the gradual de- velopment of our knowledge relating to them in the first chapter of Huxley’s ‘ Man’s Place in Nature, the animal now called gorilla was, without doubt, the pongo, well known to, and clearly described by our countryman, Andrew Battle, a contemporary of Shakespeare ; and that a really accurate and scientific account of the anatomy of the chimpanzee had been published as far back as 1699 by Dr. Edward Tyson, who, as the first English comparative anatomist, I am proud to claim as in some sort a predecessor in the chair I have the honour to hold in London, as he is described on the title-page of his work as “Reader of Anatomy at Chirurgeons’ Hall.” Linneus was, however, not acquainted with these, and his second species of the genus Homo, H. troglodytes, and his first of the genus Sima, S. satyrus, were both made up of vague and semi-fabulous accounts of the animals now known as chimpanzees and orangs, but hopelessly confounded together. Of the gorilla, and what is stranger still, of any of the large genus of gibbons, or long-armed apes of South-eastern Asia, he had at:the time he revised the Systema no idea, The remaining monkeys, we now know, fall into three very distinct sections : the Cercopithecide of the Old World, and the Cebide and Hapalide of the New, or by whatever other names we may like to designate them. Although members of all three groups appear in the list in the Systema, they are all confusedly mixed together. Eyen that the American monkeys belong to a totally different stock from those of the Old World, does not seem to have been suspected. The genus Lemur of Linnzeus comprehends five species, of which the first four were all the then known forms of a most interesting section of the Mammalia. These animals, mostly inhabitants of the great island of Madagascar, though some are found in the African continent, and others in some of the Southern and Hastern parts of Asia, constitute a well-defined group, but one of which the relations are very uncertain. At one time, as in the system of Linnzeus, they were closely asso- ciated with the monkeys. As more complete knowledge of their organization has been gradually attained, the interval which separates them structurally from those animals has become continually more evident, and since they cannot be placed within the limits of any of the previously constituted orders, it has been considered advisable by some naturalists to increase the ordinal divisions in their behalf and te allow them to take rank asa distinct group, related to the Primates on the one hand, and to the Carnivora and Insectivora on the other, The knowledge of their rela- tions, however, bids fair to be greatly increased by the discoveries of fossil forms lately made both in France and America, some of which seem to carry their affinities even to the Ungulata. Existing upon the earth at present, besides the more ordinary Lemurs to which the species known to Linnzus belong, there are two aberrant forms, each represented by a single species. These are the little Tarsius of Borneo and Celebes, and the singular Chiromys, or Aye-aye, which, though an inhabitant of the head-quarters of the group, Madagascar, and living in the same forests and under the same con- ditions as the most typical Lemurs, exhibits a thost remarkable degree of speciali- zation in the structure both of limbs and teeth, the latter being modified so as to resemble, at least superficially, those of the Rodents, a group with which in fact it was once placed. It was discovered by Sonnerat in Madagascar in 1780, two 552 REPORT— 1878, years after the death of Linnzeus. The specimen brought to Paris by this traveller was the only one known until 1860. Since that date, however, its native land has been more freely open than before to explorers, and many specimens have been obtained, one having lived for several years in the Gardens of the Londdn Zoo- logical Society. The history of a name is often not a little curious. Linneus applied the term Lemures, i.e. the departed spirits of men, to these animals on account of their nocturnal habits and ghost-like aspect. The hypothetical continent in the Indian Ocean, supposed to have connected Madagascar with the Malayan Archipelago is called by Mr. Sclater, Lemuria, as the presumed original home of the Lemur-like animals. Although the steps are not numerous, it might puzzle a classical scholar, ignorant of Zoology, to explain the connection between this continent and the Roman festival of the same name. The fifth animal which Linnzus places in his genus Lemur, under the name of L. volans, is the very singular creature to which the generic term Galeopithecus has since been applied. It is one of those completely aberrant forms, which having no . Near existing relations, and none yet discovered among extinct forms, are perfect age to systematic zoologists. It is certainly nota lemur, and nota bat, as has een supposed by some. We shrink from multiplying the orders for the sake of single genera containing only two closely allied species; so we have generally allowed it to take refuge among the Jnsectzvora, though without being able to show to which of that somewhat heterogeneous group it has any near affinities. The fourth genus of the Primates is Vespertilio, comprising six species of bats. This genus has now by universal consent expanded into an order, and one of the best characterized and distinctly circumscribed of any in the class: indeed, those who kave worked most at the details of the structure of bats find so much diversity in the characters of the skull, teeth, digestive organs, &c., associated with the modi- fication of the forelimbs for flight common to all, as almost to entitle them to be regarded rather as a sub-class. Anatomical, as well as paleeontological evidence, show that they must have diverged from the ordinary mammalian type at a very far distant date, as the earliest known forms, from the Kocene strata, are quite as specialized as any now existing, and no trace has hitherto been discovered of forms linking them to any of the non-volant orders. By the publication within the last few weeks of a valuable monograph on the existing species of the group, entitled “‘ A Catalogue of the Chiroptera in the Collection of the British Museum,” by G. E. Dobson, we are enabled to contrast our present knowledge with that of the time of Linnzeus. Although the author has suppressed a large number of nominal species which formerly encumbered our catalogues, and wisely abstained from the tendency of most monographists to multiply genera, he describes four hundred species, arranged in eighty genera: nearly double the number of species, and exactly double the number of genera, of the whole class MamMMALra in the Systema Nature, and these Dr. Giinther remarks in his Preface are probably only a portion of those existing. The small size, nocturnal habits, and difficulty of capture of these animals, are sufficient reasons for the supposition that there are still large numbers unknown to science. In the list of Linneus, the first primary group of Dobson, the Megachiroptera, now containing seventy species, is represented by a single one, V. Vampyrus, obviously a Pteropus, to which the blood-thirsty habits of the fabulous Vampyre are attributed, but which is not absolutely identi- fied with any one of the known species. The other species described by Linnzeus can almost all be identified with bats at present well known. A curious example of the results of basing classification upon a few, and those somewhat artificial characters, is afforded by one of the true bats, now called Noctilio leporinus, though admitted by Linnzeus to be ‘simellimus vespertilionibus, similiter pedibus alatus, being separated from the others, not only generically, but even placed in another order, that of the GrirxEs or Rodents, because it did not, or was supposed not, to fall under the definition of the order Prrmatxs, which begins ‘ Dentes primores incisores supertores IV. parallel.’ In reality this bat has four upper incisors, but the outer ones are so small as to have been overlooked when first examined. But even, if this were not so, no one would now dream of basing TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION D.— DEPT. ZOOLOGY AND BOTANY. 553 an animal’s position upon such a trivial character when opposed to the totality of its organization and habits. The characters of the incisor teeth are placed in the first rank in the definitions of all the orders in the Systema Nature, and hence the next order called Brora, characterized by ‘dentes primores nulli superius aut inferius,’ contains a curious mixture of heterogeneous animals, as the names of the genera Elephas, Trichechus, Bradypus, Myrmecophaga, Manis, and Dasypus will indicate. It contains, in fact, all the animals then known comprised in the modern orders of Proboscidea, Sirenia, and Edentata, together with the walrus, one of the Carnivora. The name Brura has been revived for one of these orders, that more generally called Edentata, but I think very inappropriately, for it was certainly not equivalent, and if re- tained at all, should rather belong to the Proboscidea, as Elephas stands first in the list of genera, and was probably in the mind of Linnzeus when he assigned the name to the group. It is curious to find that the striking differences between the African and the Indian elephants, now so well understood by every beginner in Zoology, and all the facts which have already been accumulated relating to the numerous extinct forms of Proboscideans, whether Mammoths, Mastodons, or Dinotheria, were quite unknown to Linneus. .One species only, Elephas maximus, represented in the zoology of a hundred years ago, was all that was known of the elephants or elephant-like animals. The genus Vrichechus of this edition exhibits a very curious phase of zoological knowledge: It contains two species. 1. 7. rosmarus, the Walrus, now known to be a modified seal, and therefore a member of the Linnwan order Ferm, and 2. 7. manatus, a name under which were included all the known forms of Manatees and Dugongs, in fact the whole of the modern order Strenia; animals widely removed in all essential points of their organization from the walrus, with which they are here generically united. Their position, however, between the elephant on the one hand and the sloths on the other, is far better than their association with the Cetacea, as in Cuvier’s system, an association from which it has been most difficult to disengage them, notwithstanding their total dissimilarity, except in a few ex- ternal characters. Although the discovery of many fossil forms has done much to link together the few existing species and to show the essential unity of the group, it has thrown no light upon their origin, or their affinities to other mam- mals. They still stand, both by their structure and their habits, a strangely isolated group, and it baffles conjecture to say whence they have been derived, or how they have attained their present singular organization. The remaining genera of the Linnzan order Brura constitute the group out of which Ouvier, following Blumenbach, formed his order Edentata, a name certainly not happily chosen for a division which includes species like the great Armadillo, having a larger number of teeth than any other land mammal, but which, neverthe- less, has been so generally adopted, and is so well understood, that to attempt to change it would only introduce an element of confusion. Four out of five of the principal modifications of form in the group at present known, are indicated by the four Linnean genera, Bradypus or Sloth, Myrmecophaga or Anteater, Manis or Pangolin, and Dasypus or Armadillo. The advances during the century have con- sisted in the accumulation of a great mass of details respecting these groups; the. addition of a fifth and very distinct existing form, the Orycteropus or Cape Ant- eater ; and the discovery of numerous and very remarkable extinct forms, such as the Megatheriums and Glyptodons of South America, so fully known by their well-preserved osseous remains. There is, however, still much to be done in work- ing out the real relationship of the somewhat isolated members of the order, if it be anatural order, both to each other, and to the rest of the Mammalia, from which they stand widely removed in many points of organization. The third order of Linnzus, Frrm, contained all the then known animals, which, with whatever diversities of general structure, agreed in their predatory habits, and possessed certain general characters of teeth and claws to correspond, though the terse definition of “ Dentes primores supertores sex, acutiuscult, canine salétarit,” is by no means universally applicable to them. This order was broken 554 REPORT—1878. up by Cuvier into the orders Carnivora and Insectivora, and the genus Didelphys, in- cluded in it by Linnzeus, has been since by universal assent removed to another group- The first six genera belong to the very well-defined and probably natural group now called Carnivora. The one placed at the head of the list, Phoca, is equivalent to the large and important modern sub-order Pinnipedia, the walrus, however, though essentially a seal, having been, as before mentioned, relegated by Linneeus to another order, on account of its aberrant dentition. But three species are recorded in the genus: P. ursina, the sea-bear of the North Pacific (now Otaria ursina) ; P. leonina, founded on Anson’s sea-lion, now commonly called the elephant seal. or sea-elephant (Macrorhinus proboscideus, or more properly leonmmus); and P. vitulina, the common seal of our coasts. The terrestrial sub-order of Carnivora is represented by five genera: 1. Canis, including the dog, wolf, hyena, fox, arctic fox, jackal, &c. 2. Felis, with only six species, but still one of the few Linnean genera, which covers exactly the same ground as at present in the opinion of the majority of zoologists, although it may be mentioned as an example of the tendency towards excessive and unnecessary multiplication of generic names which exists in some quarters, that it has been divided into as many as fourteen. 3. Viverra, a heterogeneous group, containing ichneumons, coatis, and skunks, animals belonging to three very distinct families, according to modern ideas. 4. Mustela, a far more natural group, being nearly equivalent to the modern family Mustelide ; and, lastly, a very comprehensive genus Ursus, consisting of U. meles, the badger, U. lotor, the racoon, U. duscus, the wolverene, and all the true bears known, comprised in the single species U. arctos. Many interesting forms of Carnivora, as Cryptoprocta, Proteles, Eupleres, Ailurus, and Arluropus, have no place in the Linnean system, being comparatively modern discoveries. The very recent date (1869) at which the last-named remark- able animal was made known to science by the enterprising researches of the Abbé David into the Fauna of Eastern Thibet, gives hope that we may not yet be at the end of the discovery of even large and hitherto unsuspected forms of existing mammals. Next in the Linnean system comes the genus Didelphys, constituted for the reception of five species of American opossums, ‘Thisis a very interesting landmark in the history of the progress of the knowledge of the animal life of the world, as these five opossums, forming a genus in the midst of the order Ferm, were all that was then known of the great sub-class Marsupialia, now constituting a group entirely apart from the ordinary members of the class. It is difficult now to imagine an animal world without kangaroos, without wombats, without phalangers, without thylacines, without dasyures, and so many other familiar forms, and yet such was the animal world known to Linneus. It is true that a species of kangaroo from one of the islands of the Austro-Malayan Archipelago was described as long ago as 1714 by De Bruyn, who saw it alive at the house of the Dutch governor of Batavia, and that Captain Cook and Sir Joseph Banks saw and killed kangaroos on the east coast of Australia in 1770, and had published figures and descriptions of them in 1773, or five years before the death of Linnzeus, but the work we are now considering contains no traces of knowledge of the existence of such a remarkable and now so well-known animal. The three remaining genera of Ferm, Talpa, Sorex, and Erinaceus, contained all the known species of the present order Insucrrvora, which now embraces many and very varied forms, quite unsuspected a century ago, and to which it is probable that others will be added by the time the exploration of the animal products of the world is completed. The fourth order, GirREs, has remained practically unchanged to our day, although the name Rodentia has generally superseded that bestowed ‘upon it by Linneeus. The five genera of the Systema Nature, Hystrix, Lepus, Castor, Mus, and Sciwrus, have been vastly increased, partly by subdivision and partly by the discovery of new forms. Noctilio is, as before mentioned, removed to the Chiroptera, but its loss is well compensated for by Hydrocherus, the well-known Capybara,. the largest existing member of the group, which in the Linnean system is placed: among the Bellue, in the same genus with the pigs. TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION D.—DEPT. ZOOLOGY AND BOTANY. 555 The fifth Linnzean order, Prcora, is a fairly natural group, equivalent to Ouvier’s Rwminantia; but it is no longer considered of the value of an order, since the animals composing it have now been shown to be as closely related to certain of those belonging to the next order as they are to each other. The first genus, Camelus, contains both the American Lamas and the Old World camels, the demonstration of the common origin and close affinities of which has been one of the important results of the recent discoveries in the paleontology of the Western continent. In the next genus, Moschus, were placed the well-known musk deer of the highlands of Central Asia, and two small African antelopes, which have no special affinity with it. The subsequent inclusion in the same genus of the small chevrotains (Traguline), which was very natural at the time, as they agree per- fectly with the musk in the absence of horns and the presence of large canine tusks, by which artificial characters the genus was defined by Linnzeus, was one of those unfortunate associations which has greatly retarded the progress of knowledge of the true affinities of the group. Judging by the popular works on Zoology, it is still as difficult to apprehend that a chevrotain is not a musk deer, as it is that a manatee is not a cetacean; both errors of the same kind, if not quite so gross, as that of regarding a whale as a fish, ora bat asa bird. The genus Cervus contains six species of true deer, including the moose, reindeer, red deer, fallow and roe, associated with the giraffe. The twenty-one species at that time recognized of the great group of hollow-horned Ruminants are distributed quite artificially in three genera, Capra, Ovis, and Bos. Though subsequent investigations have greatly increased the number of species known, we are still in much uncertainty about their mutual affinities and generic distinctions. Being a group of comparatively modern origin, and only just attaining its complete development, variation has chiefly affected the less essential and superticial organs, and the process of extinction of intermediate forms has not operated sufficiently long to break it up into distinctly separated natural minor groups, as is the case with many of the older families, which yield, therefore, far more readily to the needs of systematic classification, especially as long as the extinct forms are unknown or ignored. The sixth order of land mammals, BELLU”®, corresponding to the Pachydermata of Cuvier, contains what is now known to be a heterogeneous collection, viz. the horses, the hippopotamus, the pigs, rhinoceros, and the rodent capybara. The abolition of these two last orders and the entire re-arrangement of the ungulate mammals, into two different natural groups, now called Artiodactyla and Perisso- dactyla, first indicated by Cuvier in the ‘ Ossemens fossiles,’ from the structure of the limbs alone, and afterwards confirmed by Owen from comparison of every part of the organization, has been one of the most solid advances made in our knowledge of the relations of the Mammalia during the present century. The past history of this, as of so many other groups of vertebrated animals, has been brought to light in an unexpected manner by the wonderful discoveries of fossil remains made during the last ten years in the Rocky Mountains of America ; discoveries, the importance of which will only be fully appreciated when the elaborate and beautifully illustrated work which Professor Marsh has now in progress, is completed. The last Linnzean order, Crt, is exactly conterminous with the order so named, or rather more generally modified to Cetacea, in the best modern systems, for Linneus did not commit the error of Cuvier and others, of including the Strenia among the whales. His knowledge of the animals composing the group was neces- sarily very imperfect, indeed it is only within the last few years, especially since the impulse given to their study by Eschricht of Copenhagen, that the great difficulties which surround the investigation of the structure and habits of these denizens of the open sea have been so far surmounted that we have begun to obtain clear views of their organization, affinities, and geographical distribution. Two most remarkable forms of mammals, so abnormal in their organization as now to be generally considered deserving the rank of a distinct sub-class, the Hehidna and Ornithorhynchus, were first made known to science in 1792 and 1799 respectively, and consequently have no place in the Systema Nature. The very recent discovery 556 REPORT— 1878. of a third form to this group, or at least a very striking modification of one of the forms, the large New Guinea echidna (Acanthoglossus Bruynit), is the last im- portant acquisition to our knowledge of the class. In this brief review of the progress of one small section of one branch of zoological knowledge it will be seen that it is chiefly of systems of arrangement, of classification, and of names that I have been treating. By many biologists of the present day these are looked upon as the least attractive and least profitable branches of the subject. The interest of classification, though it has lost much in some senses by the modern advances of scientific biology, has, however, gained vastly in others. The idea that has now, chiefly in consequence of the writings of Darwin, taken such strong hold upon all working naturalists—the idea of a gradual growth and progressive evolution, and therefore genetic connection between all living things—breaks down the artificial barriers which zoologists raise around their groups, and shows that such names as species, genera, families, orders, &c., are merely more or less clumsy attempts to express various shades of differences among creatures connected by infinite gradations, and in this sense destroys the importance attached to them by our predecessors. On the other hand, it immensely increases the interest contained in the word “ relationship,” as it implies that the word is used in a real and not, as formerly, in a metaphorical sense. There is a kind of classifi- cation, such as we might apply to inanimate substances or manufactured articles. We may say, for instance, that a tumbler, a wine-glass, and a tea-cup are more ‘closely related to each other than either one is to a chair or a table, and that they might be formed into one group, and the last-named objects be placed in a second. This kind of classification is certainly useful in its way, for methodical arrangement -and descriptive purposes. It is the kind of arrangement which Linnzeus and his contemporaries applied to animals. It is, however, a very different classification from that which supposes that the members of a group having common essential characters are descended from a common ancestor, and have gradually, by whatever cause or means, become differentiated from other groups. On this view a true classification, if it could be obtained, would be a revelation of the whole secret of the evolution of animal life, and it is no wonder that many are willing to devote so large a share of their energies to endeavour to attain it. The right application of the principles of nomenclature, first clearly established by Linnzeus, to the groups we form is, again, by no means to be despised, as laxity and carelessness in this respect are becoming more and more the greatest hindrances to the study of Zoology. The introduction of any new term, especially a generic name, and indeed the use of an old one by any person whose authority carries weight, has an appreciable effect upon the progress of science, and should never be done without a full sense of the responsibility incurred. All beginners are puzzled and often repelled by the confused state of zoological nomenclature to an extent to which those who have advanced so far as only to care for the things, and to whom the actual names by which they are called are comparatively indifferent, have little idea. Those whose special gift or inclination leads them to the pursuit of other branches of Biology, as Morphology, Physiology, Embryology, &c., must have definite names for the objects they observe, depict, or describe, and are de- pendent upon the researches of the systematic zoologist for supplying them, and catons not neglect to take his counsel, otherwise much of their work will lose its value. Several times has the British Association thought this a worthy subject for the consideration of its members, and through the instrumentality of a committee of working naturalists drew up in 1842 an excellent code of regulations and sugges- tions on the subject of zoological nomenclature. These rules were revised and reprinted in 1865; and in accordance with a resolution adopted at the last annual meeting at Plymouth they have been again republished at the cost of the Asso- ciation during the present year. The mere issue of such rules must have had a beneficial effect, as they have undoubtedly been a guide to many careful and conscientious workers. Unfortunately there are no means of enforcing them upon those of a different class, and there is still something wanting, short of enforcing them, which possibly may be within the power of the Association to effect. In . ¥ ’ TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION D.—DEPT. ZOOLOGY AND BOTANY. 557 the administration of the judicial affairs of a nation, besides the makers of the laws, we have an equally essential body to interpret or apply the law to particular cases— the judges. However carefully compiled or excellent a code of regulations may be, dubious and difficult cases will arise, to which the application of the law is not always clear, and about which individual opinions will differ. The necessary permission given in the Association rules to change names which are either ‘glaringly false,’ or ‘not clearly defined,’ opens the door to considerable latitude of private interpretation. As what we are aiming at is simply convenience and general accord, and not absolute justice or truth, there are also cases in which the rigid law of priority, even if it can be ascertained, requires qualification, and other cases in which it may be advisable to put up with a small error or inconvenience to: avoid falling into a larger one. I may name such cases as the propriety of reviving an obsolete or almost unknown name for one which, if not strictly legitimate, has been universally accepted, or the retention of a name when already applied to a. different genus, instead of the institution of another in its place. For instance, should the name Echidna, by which the well-known Monotremous Mammal is. known in every text-book and catalogue in every language, be susperseded by Tachyglossus, because the former name had previously been applied to a genus of snakes? or should the chimpanzee be no longer called Troglodytes lest it should be confounded with a wren? Should Chiromys be discarded for Daubentonia, Trichechus for Odobenus, and Tapirus for Hydrocherus? Should the Java slow lemur be called Loris, Stenops, or Nycticebus? Should Sowerby’s whale be placed in the genus Physeter, Delphinus, Delphinorhynchus, Heterodon, Diodon, Aodon, Nodus, Ziphius, Micropterus, Micropteron, Mesodiodon, Dioplodon, or Mesoplodon, in all of which it may be found in various systematic lists? Should one of the largest and best known of the Cetaceans of our seas be called Balenoptera mus- culus, Physalus antiquorum, or Pterobalena communis, all names used for it by authors of high authority? Should the smallest British seal be called Phoca hisyrda, feetida, or anellata? I might go on indefinitely multiplying instances which will be answered differently by different naturalists, the arguments for one or the other name being often nicely balanced. What is wanted, therefore, issome kind of judicial authority for deciding which should in future be used. If a committee of eminent naturalists, selected from various nations, and divided into several sections, according to the subjects with which each member is mosé familiar, could be prevailed upon to take up the task of revising the whole of our existing nomenclature upon the basis of the laws issued by the Association in 1842, occasionally tempering their strictly legal decisions with a little discretion and common sense, and with a view, as much as possible, of avoiding confusion, and promoting general convenience; and if the working zoologists of the world generally would agree to accept the decisions of such a committee as final, we should dispose of many of the difficulties with which we are now troubled. ‘here seems to me no more reason why the nomen- clature of such a committee, if it were composed of men in whose judgment their fellow-workers would have confidence, should not be as universally accepted as is. “the nomenclature of the last edition of the Systema Nature of Linneus. We have agreed not to look beyond that work for evidence of privrity, aud why should we not agree in the same way to accept decisions which would probably be arrived at with even fuller knowledge and greater sense of responsibility ? Whether this suggestion will be received with favour or not, it appeared to me that it was one not inappropriate for the consideration of this Section which has already dealt with the question in'a manner so advantageous to science, and also for this year which has witnessed the hundredth anniversary of the death of the great teacher of systematic zoology. Our knowledge of the living inhabitants of the earth has indeed changed since that time. Our views of their relations to the universe, to each other, and to our- selves, have undergone great revolutions. The knowledge of Linnzeus far sur- _ passed that of any of his contemporaries ; but yet of what we now know he knew ut an infinitesimal amount. Much that he thought he knew we now deem false. ! Nevertheless, some of the oldest words to be found in all his writings contain 558 REPORT— 1878. sentiments which still claim a response in the hearts of many. Although we are less accustomed to see such words in works of science, that is no proof that their significance has been impaired by the marvellous progress of knowledge. With the words which Linnzus selected to place at the head of his great work I will conclude— “O Jehova, Quam ampla sunt tua opera! Quam sapienter ea fecistt ! Quam plena est terra possessione tua !’ The following Papers were read :— 1. Report of the Close-time Committee.—See Reports, p. 146. 2. Report of the Committee on the Zoological Station at Naples. See Reports, p. 149. 3. On the Geographical Distribution of the Cheiroptera. By Dr. G. E. Dosson. Ordered by the General Committee to be printed in eatenso among the Reports. See p. 158. 4. Notes on the Geographical Distribution and Migrations of Birds, S§e., on the Northern Shores and Lands of Hudson's Bay. By J. Raz, M.D., LL.D., F.R.G.S. Dr. Rae read a long paper on the above subject, chiefly with the object of supple- menting the writings of Sir John Richardson, whose descriptions are in some instances incomplete, in consequence of that admirable zoologist not having been able to visit certain localities in the Hudson’s Bay Company’s territory, and having had to depend upon the reports of others, who sometimes were not very conver- ‘sant with the subject. TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION D.—DEPT. ZOOLOGY AND BOTANY. 559 FRIDAY, AUGUST 16, 1878. The following Papers were read :— 1. Notes on a case of Commensalism in the Holothuria. By Dr. A. F. ANDERSON. 2. On certain Osteological Characters in the Cervide and their probable bearings on the past History of the Group. By Sir Victor Brooke, Bart. 3. The Habits of Ants. By Sir Joun Luszock, F.R.S. 4. On the Habits of the Field-Vole (Arvicola agrestis, L.). By Sir Watter Exuior, F.B.S. The species above named, more commonly known as the short-tailed field-mouse, has been observed of late to be annually increasing. In the early part of 1876, it appeared in such numbers in the hill pasture farms of the border districts between England and Scotland, and in the western parts of Yorkshire, as to cause serious damage to the grazing ground on which the sheep mainly depend for maintenance in spring, thereby inflicting serious loss on farmers by the impoverishment and death of stock. Notwithstanding the efforts of the shepherds and their dogs, assisted by an unusual influx of birds and beasts of prey—hawks, buzzards, owls, weasels, foxes, &c.—their numbers were not sensibly diminished; but on the approach of summer they began to perish with hunger after exhausting their own means of subsistence, and the few survivors were driven by starvation to their usual haunts. Their favourite abodes are low-lying humid meadows and damp plantations, in which they construct superficial burrows, breeding five or six times in the year, and preducing six to eight young at a birth. Autumnal rains and severe winter frosts generally ]oll great numbers, and it is to an absence of these checks, during a series of mild seasons from 1872-76, that their late abnormal increase is attributed. It is remarkable that during the same period a kindred foreign species, the Arvicola arvalis, Pallas, was creating similar damage to the corn-tields of Austria and Hungary, and only the other day a paragraph in the Times stated that they are now destroying the wheat crop in Moldavia. Several instances are recorded of mischief done by the common vole to young plantations, notably those described by Jesse in the royal forests of Hampshire and Gloucestershire. These facts show that although they have hitherto confined their attacks (as far as known) in our own country to woods and pastures, they may, under con- ditions favourable to their increase, attack our cereal produce. It would be well, therefore, for game preservers to consider whether they are not promoting such a contingency by the persistent destruction, under the name of vermen, of the natural enemies of the vole, and for farmers to reflect whether they may not carry too far the extirpation of the mole, of which voles are a favourite prey. 560 REPORT— 1878. One object in offering these observations to the section was to ascertain whether anything similar had been observed in Ireland, where it is believed the vole is not common, for it is observed that it, as well as its British congeners, A. amphibia and A. glareolus, are omitted from Mr. Barrington’s list of mammals given at page 91 of part ii, in the Guide to Dublin prepared for this meeting of the Associa- . tion.* * The paper of which the above is an extract will appear in the ‘ Transactions. of the Berwickshire Naturalists’ Club’ for the current year. SATURDAY, AUGUST 17, 1878. The Department did not meet. TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION D.—DEPT. ZOOLOGY AND BOTANY. 561 MONDAY, AUGUST 19, 1878. The following Papers were read :— 1. Report on the Present State of our Knowledge of the Crustacea. Part IV. On Development. See Reports, p. 193. 2. On the Willemoesia Growp of Crustacea. By C. Spence Bats, F.R.S. Among the many objects of interest taken from the depths of the ocean during the cruise of the Challenger, there were few that attracted more attention than the so- called blind Crustacea. These were described by Mr. Willemoes-Suhm rather fully both in ‘Nature’ and in the ‘Transactions of the Linnean Society,’—in the pages of the former under the name of Deidamia; but in the latter Mr. Grote, having discovered that this name had been in use for a genus of Sphingide, changed it to Willemoesia, in com- pliment to the unfortunate marine zoologist of the expedition. Soon after it had been published it was recognized by those who had given at- tention to the subject to resemble a small crustacean that Dr. Heller had described among the “ Crustaceen des siidlichen Europa,” from a single male specimen in the collection of the museum at Vienna, to which he gave the name of Polycheles typhlops, belonging to the same group. I believe that I am correct in stating that Mr. Wood-Mason was the first, in the ‘ Journal of the Asiatic Society ’ for 1875, to point out the resemblance between the Polycheles of Heller and Willemoesia of the Challenger expedition. Each of these zoologists has described the animal as being blind; and it is sup- posed that on this character Heller founded the specific name of his species, the eyes of which, he says, are rudimentary ; and Willemoes-Suhm says that “the eyes are entirely wanting, nor is there any place left open where you might expect to find them.” Both these observant naturalists haye passed over the peculiar character of the organ of vision that belongs to this group of animals. Heller has classified it with the family Astacidze in a division by itself; and they haye both asserted that it closely corresponds with the fossil genus Eryon. Dr. Camil Heller, moreover, says that it bears a strong resemblance in the form of the body to the ‘Scyllaride,’ from which it differs essentially by the structure of the antennze, the form of the chele, and the narrow sternum. With the Astacide it has in common the possession of the leaf-like appendage at the base of the second antennze and the chelate character of the pereiopoda; in all other respects it differs from Astacus. Willemoes-Suhm says: “ Among the living Decapoda Macrura there is hardly a group with which Wellemoesia could be said to be very closely allied. Nearest to it are undoubtedly the “Scyllarine ;” but these, like all the genera of the family Palinuride, differ from it in the absence of the lamellar appendage of the second _ antennze, and in the presence of palpi at the base of the gnathopoda, which, as we haye seen, are wanting in this new genus. Nor can it, for this latter reason, be re- ped to the Astacide, with which it has in common the presence of the antennal scale,” “The genus,” says Heller, corresponds greatly with the fossil crustacean de- Scribed by Deshayes from the slate-quarries of Solenhofen (Eryon Cuvieri), since 1878. 00 ’ 562 REPORT—1878. also in this are found a flattened carapace and similarly formed antenne and pereipoda. The hinder part of the body is much narrower than the anterior; and the leaf-like appendage of the second pair of antenne is much enlarged. It forms a link between the Scyllaridz on the one hand, and the Astacidz on the other.” “Tt is very astonishing, indeed,” says Willemoes-Suhm, “that, among all the crustaceans known to us, Willemoesta approaches most closely the fossil Eryontide. If we compare, for example, our figure of W. crucifera with the figure of Eryon arctiformis, and the description of the ‘Tribu des Eryons’ given by Milne-Edwards (and probably taken especially from Desmarest’s ‘ Crustacés Fossiles’) we find most striking resemblances between the two forms. In W. crucifera as well asin Eryon the carapace has nearly half the length of the whole body; and in both forms its lateral borders are wing-like expansions which are divided by two deep incisions into three portions. The anterior border of the carapace is nearly straight in both forms. “ Eryon was probably not blind; for the eye-stalks have been found in several specimens. Its antennz seem to be somewhat more reduced then in Willemoesia ; but the second pair of them has, according to Desmarest, ‘ une écaille assez large, ovoide et fortement échancrée.’ This is the chief difference between Eryon and the Palinuride, and the same in which Willemoesia also differs from that group.” So much do the fossil and recent animals resemble each other that the dis- coverer of the recent species says, ‘If the last pair of pereiopoda and the pleon of Eryon were presented to me I should undoubtedly declare them to be parts of the genus Wellemoesta. There are the same line of spines at the top of the rings, the same wing-like expansions on both sides, and that characteristic ‘caudal apparatus.’ Also the fine fringe of hairs which distinguishes the caudal fin of Wéllemoesia is to be seen in the fossil crustacean.” “ Eryon,” continues the same author, “ differs from the living genus chiefly by the presence of eye-stalks and of palpi at the base of the gnathopoda. According to Guenstedt, the latter were observed only with difficulty; and their presence seems not to be beyond all doubt.” And the lamented carcinologist of the expe- dition looked forward to his return, when he would look over the original specimens and satisfy himself, so as to enable him to give a more detailed account of the relations of Wellemoesia to Eryon. That they must be very close he had no doubt, and considered that among the Eryontide this new genus must take its place, between the Astacide and Palinuride. It will be desirable that we should examine the animals and see how far the conclusions arrived at by two independent observers can be supported by extended inquiry. Taller describes Polycheles as having a thin dermal structure, »wdimentary eyes, antenne like those of Willemoesia, and four pairs of pereiopoda chelate, and one (the fifth pair) simple. Willemoes-Suhm describes Willemoesia as having the eyes and eye-stalks entirely ° wanting ; four or five pairs of pereiopoda chelate in distinct species. In all other respects the descriptions of the two authors agree.. The Challenger collection contains specimens of this group from thirteen different places; and in every one I was able, upon close examination, to find the eyes very distinct, though singularly situated. Moreover, there is a variation in form and position that gives them a value in classification, particularly when taken into consideration with the relative forms of the several pairs of pereiopoda. The dorsal surface of the several species of this group is flattened and de- pressed, and the anterior margin is tolerably straight; the central tooth, which is sometimes single and sometimes double, is never directed forwards in the form of a rostrum, but upwards and obliquely forwards. In the anterior margin on each side there is a deep cleft in the dorsal surface, in which the eye with its peduncle is lodged; the anterior extremity, being directed forwards, outwards, and down- wards, is covered over by the lateral projecting wings of the carapace. It appears to have two points of vision, the one upwards by the dorsal surface, the other downwards and outwards by the lens at the extremity of the peduncle. But these several points are liable to vary in degree. In some the dorsal notch is almost non-existent, in others it is very deep; and it is by this variation, taken in TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION D.—DEPT. ZOOLOGY AND BOTANY. 563 connection with the power of change in the form of the pereiopoda, that I purpose classifying the several species of this interesting group. PorycHeEtEs, Heller. (Crust. des siidl. Europa.) Tn this genus I accept the author’s definition, that it has the anterior four pairs of pereiopoda chelate and the fifth simple. But instead of saying that the eyes are rudimentary, I assert that they are immovably lodged in a notch in the dorsal surface of the carapace, with the anterior extremity projecting beneath the antero- lateral wings of the carapace. PENTACHELES, 0. g. All the pereiopoda are chelate, and the eyes are lodged immovably in a notch in the antero-dorsal surface of the carapace, with the anterior extremity projected beneath the antero-lateral wing-like extremity of the carapace. WILLEmMoEsIA, Grote. (‘ Nature,’ October 1873.) All the pereiopoda chelate, and the eyes immovably situated in the anterior or frontal surface of the cephalon, and neither lodged in a notch in the dorsal surface of the carapace nor covered by the antero-lateral wing of the carapace. Eyes small, directed outwards and forwards. PoLYCHELES. 4 : Fathoms Temp. CRUGITEr eto seesk ces West Indies ...... 450 ... Glob.-ooze. 13 Cla eee ee KermadecIsland... 520 6° Hard. Wp Waceassiesseeaees New Guinea ...... 1070 2°'1 ~ Glob.-ooze. WPHeCAULIS) Mc sseec0s HBigiigashawcctskeesseene 310 Soh wes typhlops ............ Mediterranean...... +. oe PENTACHELES. MRIS tar swes cea ccnctsss Philippine Islands 500 5°3 Gilob.-ooze. PSM ORNT, F200 54.80 200 Dataeonig a. ..-c.-.- 120 a ds SRPRCING 5... cess ta. IBY coer carps gees 610 3°7 — Gilob.-ooze. ObSCurus ............ New Guinea ...... 1070 2°-1 Glob.-ooze. auriculatus ......... Bujtccecctetwses ee CLO ... Glob.-ooze. MORTON oc cdiece socks New Hebrides...... 315 ae al C. WILLEMOESIA. leptodactyla ......... North Atlantic ... 1900 1°°9 Gilob.-ooze. wens ....Juan Fernandez... 1375 1°8 Glob.-ooze. ” The eyes of the several genera, although they may differ from each other in structural detail, yet correspond throughout the group in a common characteristic. The peduncle is reduced to a minimum and fixed as a rigid part of the dermal structure, over which a portion of the carapace is projected. If we turn to the animal while it is yet embryonic (and our only opportunity is its observation before it has quitted the egg), although in an advanced condition, we see that previously to the eruption from the ovum it attains atleast the zoéa stage of development, and that the eyes are large and distinctly pedunculated, just in the same way as the zoéa of Alpheus in the embryonic condition ha eyes con- siderably larger and more like the permanent organ in other genera than the adult parent from which it springs. The alteration from the original type to a depauperised condition is therefore due to causes acting through the habits of the animal after it has passed through its zoéa stage. This is precisely the way that Alpheus has passed; anil as the 002 564 REPORT—1878. result has been somewhat similar, it is highly probable that the conditions have been parallel. Alpheus in the young stage is a free-swimming animal with powerful organs of vision ; but in its adult condition it burrows in the mud of the sea-bottom, where the eyes are of little use, except to see things in close proximity, and where they are liable to injury from rough accidents, unless they be protected, as they are, by the streneth of the overlying carapace. The history of Willemoesta and its allies I believe to be very parallel with that of Alpheus. In its young stage it has well-developed eyes, which it loses when it has arrived at its adult condition. This I believe to be attributable to a similar cause, viz. that it burrows in the soft mud of the deep-sea bottom. This is borne out by an examination of the contents of the stomach, which I found to be full of the remains of the structures found in the Globigerina-ooze. That the depauperised state of the organs of vision is not due to the loss of light from the great depth at which Willemoesia is taken is evident from the fact that Thalascaris, n.g. (Cranognide) is taken at depths equally great, and is remarkable for the large size of its eyes. ; Willemoesia, moreover, is not necessarily one of our deepest sea inhabitants. Willemoesia leptodactyla was taken both in the Atlantic and Pacific at a depth of 1900 and 1375, while Polycheles Hellert and Pentacheles obscurus were taken north of New Guinea at a depth of 1070; yet most of the other species, even in- cluding Polycheles Helert, were taken at depths between 610 and 120 fathoms. The bottom temperature has only been recorded in seven of the stations at which the species were taken—that is, only from the deeper soundings; these, however, vary from 6° to 1°8 C. Iam therefore inclined to think that temperature can only be second to that of the character of the sea~bottom itself. Out of the thirteen stations from which specimens of this group have been recorded, the bottom consists of what has been named Gilobigerina-ooze in eight, one is recorded of mud, and two ‘r.c.’ (which, I suppose means red clay), and one only on hard ground; but as this occurs only once, and that with an animal (Polycheles Helleri) that is also recorded from another station where Globigerina- ooze exists, I think that we may safely infer that the whole group are inhabitants of a soft bottom, preferring that in which animal life suitable for their existence abounds, and that their general structure and form are in accord with their habitat. 3. On the supposed Radiolarians and Diatoms of the Coal-measures.* By Professor W. C. Winuiamson, F.R.S. 4. On the Association of an Inconspicuous Corolla with Proterogynous Dichogamy in Insect-fertilised Flowers. By Aux. 8. Witson, M.A., B.Sc. . It is a well-ascertained fact that the great majority of conspicuously coloured flowers are proterandrous, that is, the anthers are matured before the stigmas of the same flower. Plants where this arrangement for the prevention of self-fertilisation obtains have also for the most part their flowers growing close to each other, forming a more or less compact inflorescence, as in Erica, Calluna, Vaccinium, Digi- talis, Linaria, Gladiolus, &c. The flowers are also in many cases all turned to one side of the floral axis, the inflorescence being termed secund. By these means the plants as a whole are rendered more conspicuous. In the indefinite or basifugal mode of flowering which is the commonest form, the flowers come out in succession from below upwards; hence on any given spike the older flowers will be lower down than the younger ones, and it follows with proterandrous dichogamy the lower flowers will at a given time be in the second or female stage, while those towards the upper extremity of the stalk will have only attained to the first or male condition. The lower flowers will in fact have shed all their pollen, and have their stigmas ready to be fertilised by the time the anthers of the upper flowers are beginning to shed pollen, On the other hand, in a plant with proterogynous * See Section C., p. 534. TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION D.—DEPT. ZOOLOGY AND BOTANY. 565 dichogamy, it is clear that, if we still keep to the indefinite mode of flowering, the lower or older flowers on any given plant will be in the second or male stage by the time the younger upper ones have reached the first or female stage, seeing that in this case the stigma is developed before the anthers of each flower. Scrophwaria nodosa affords a good example of a plant having proterogynous dichogamy, and to it the present paper chiefly refers. In this plant the stigma, after fertilisation, is removed out of the pathway to the nectar by the bending back of the style on the outside of the corolla; thereafter the stamens straighten out to occupy the place formerly held by the stigma, and begin to shed their pollen in this position. The corolla of this flower, as usual in proterogynous plants, is small and obscurely coloured. There is also a /ax inflorescence, the flowers not being crowded together on one side as in proterandrous and highly coloured flowers, but scattered all round, so that as a whole the plant is not easily discerned from a distance, nor does it readily strike the eye as a conspicuous object. That it is truly dependent on insects and not on the wind for the transference of its pollen, is proved by the presence of a well- developed nectariferous gland, and by its emitting odour. Its inflorescence so far agrees with the indefinite form that as a whole the older flowers (in this case male) occur lower down than the younger (female) ones. Among such inconspicuously flowered plants proterogynous dichogamy seems to prevail, just as the proterandrous is characteristic of highly coloured flowers. Hitherto it has not been shown in what way an entomophilous or insect-fertilised plant could possibly profit by a small uncoloured corolla, nor has any reason been given why this apparent dis- advantage should be generally associated with proterogynous dichogamy. The aa of a wasp visiting Scrophularia nodosa afforded the solution of this pro- lem. The manner in which it proceeded was quite exceptional. The first flower on the stem which it visited was the top one; from this it passed to the others in a somewhat irrecular manner going downwards, and finally left the plant from the lowest flower. The same thing having been observed repeatedly, a key to the whole question was furnished ; for any one who has watched bees collecting honey from flowers must have observed that the bee goes to the bottom flowers first, and then visits those next above on the same stalk in regular succession from below upwards, Now, that this order of visitation is of importance in reference to the cross-fertili- sation of a plant, will be obvious if we bear in mind a fact which the experiments of Mr. Darwin (‘Cross and Self-fertilisation,’ p. 299) have clearly demonstrated, viz., that “a cross between the flowers on the same plant does not at all increase the number of seeds, or only occasionally, and to a slight degree.” Now, were an insect invariably to visit first those flowers on a plant which are shedding their pollen, and then to pass to those with mature stigmas, clearly the usual result of this would be that it simply removed pollen from the anthers of the flowers in the male stage, and deposited it on the stigmas of those flowers on the same plant which happened to be in the female stage. The effect of this would be little or no better than self- fertilisation. This is well illustrated in the case of Gladiolus. In this strikingly beautiful plant we have well-marked protandry in association with a highly con- spicuous perianth, while the development of the flowers is from below up, so that the older lower flowers have shed their pollen by the time that of the upper ones are ready. The anthers are at first bent forwards and downwards, so that they rub their polien on the back of a bee entering the flower; meanwhile the immature stigma is above and behind them, quite out of the way of an insect going into the flower. When the pollen is shed, however, the stamens straighten up out of the way, while the stigma lobes expand and bend downwards and forwards, so that they stand in the fairway to the nectar ready to scrape off pollen from any insect as it passes down the tube formed by the perianth. In this case a bee entering one of the lower and older flowers has any pollen that it brings with it from another plant removed from its back by the pendant stigmas of these flowers, and when it ascends to the younger male flowers towards the top of the spike receives a plentiful supply of pollen previous to leaving for another plant. This pollenit will not fail to deposit on the stigmas of the female flowers which it first enters. From this it appears, then, that the whole elaborate arrangements of Gladiolus to ensure cross-fertilisa- tion would be frustrated, were the insects frequenting it to begin at the top flowers and proceed downwards, instead of visiting them in the reverse order from below 566 REPORT—1878. up as they habitually do, for pollen would then simply be taken from the younger upper flowers, and deposited on the stigmas of those lower down the stalk. In like manner, a similar effect would result in the case of proterogynous plants, were these visited exclusively by bees or insects adhering to the ascending habit of the bee, for pollen would in that case be transferred from the lower older male flowers to the upper female ones, the insect leaving with little or no pollen to carry to another spike. Thus the chances of cross-fertilisation would be minimised, and the ends served by the flower’s dichogamy, nectar, and odour would be missed. For these reasons it seems highly probable that proterogynous plants like Scrophularia nodosa are adapted to the visits of insects which do not possess the ascending habit of the bee, but visit flowers when in search of honey in an irregular manner, or in an order exactly the opposite of that observed by the bee, as in the case of wasps visiting Scrophularia before referred to. The lax inflorescence, too, favours an irregular order of visitation, for as the flowers are placed at a distance apart, it is almost impossible for an insect to visit them in perfectly regular order. We see, then, that in both cases things are so arranged that an insect on coming to a plant shall first enter a female flower, and there deposit the pollen it brings from other plants, and that before it leaves, whether a bee leaving from the top, or a wasp from the lower flowers, it is well dusted with pollen from the male flowers it last enters, According to H. Miiller, the flowers of Scrophularia are chiefly frequented by wasps ; and S. aquatica Mr. Darwin states to be fertilised exclusively by wasps. It seems only fair to infer that such flowers are in some way specialised to suit the nature and habits of these insects. We have thus got so far with our explanation as to see how plants having proterogynous dichogamy do not have their apparatus for cross-fertilisation rendered ineffectual, as would undoubtedly be the case were the ascending mode of visiting flowers rigidly followed and universal among all species of insects. It still remains to trace the connection of this with obscurity in the flowers, which appear to shun observation almost as distinctly as proterandrous flowers court it. Within certain limits it is an advantage as regards cross-fertilisa- tion that a plant’s visitors should be confined to a few or even to one species of insect, for an insect visiting all flowers indiscriminately would be likely to have deposited all the pollen taken from a particular species of flower on the stigmas of other and different species where it would be of no use, before coming to another plant of the same species as the first. This is probably the reason why the great majority of flowers are visited only by a very limited number of species of insects. Sir John Lubbock gives a list of plants with one species opposite each as its sole visitant; whether this be really so or not, unmistakably there is a tendency in this direction. If, then, we find a plant whose flowers secrete nectar, and ascertain that it is visited almost exclusively by certain species of insects, and if the flowers do not possess a large coloured corolla, we are at liberty to conclude that these insects are able to find such plants without its guidance, and that the materials consumed in its production can be otherwise turned to better account in the economy of the plant, just as in the case of self-fertile cleistogamic flowers. Assuming, then, that inconspicuous flowers are adapted .to the visits of wasps, is there anything in the habits of these insects different from those of bees, that would afford an explanation of the remarkable fact that they appear to be able to discover a small uncoloured flower as easily as a bee can a large and con- spicuous one? Wasps differ from bees in one important respect, that while the latter are exclusively vegetable feeders, the former add to their vegetable diet by prey- ing on insects smaller than themselves. AJ] through the animal kingdom carnivorous animals are endowed with keener powers of scent and vision than graminivorous creatures, Indeed, it is a direct result of natural selection that a creature whose food is perpetually eluding it should in time acquire acuter perceptive powers than one whose food is more easily obtained. That keenness of vision, then, which enables a wasp to descry its prey at a distance, aided by an acute sense of odour, in all probability also enables it to discover these obscure flowers without the guidance afforded by a large coloured corolla. This obscurity, therefore, specially adapts these flowers for fertilisation by wasps to the exclusion of insects less highly en- dowed in these respects; while the wasp gains this advantage, that it has an increased chance of finding honey in such flowers on account of the likelihood of TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION D.—DEPT. ZOOLOGY AND BOTANY. 567 their being overlooked by other honey collecting insects. For this reason wasps, as Mr. Darwin observes, do not frequent coloured flowers to the same extent that bees do, as they probably meet so often with disappointments in the way of flowers that have been emptied of their nectar previously. Hence it appears that the bee is more highly specialised as a collector of honey than the wasp. 5. On the Nectar of Flowers. By Auzx. 8. Witson, M.A., B.Sc. Some observations on this subject made by the author during the past summer revealed several highly interesting. points connected with the labours of an insect collecting honey. ‘These are attended with more difficulties than might at first sight be supposed, for it appears that nectar is only produced during certain states of the atmosphere—dry warm weather being most favourable. The industry of the bee is probably indispensable to its existence, as a small quantity of honey represents a very large numberof flowers visited. In the case of thecommon red clover, 125 heads were found by analysis to give one gramme of sugar. Now, as each head con- tains about sixty florets, even in this plant, which is comparatively rich in nectar, 7,500,000 distinct flower-tubes must be sucked for each kilogram of sugar collected. This corresponds to about two and a half millions of visits for a pound of honey. _ In most of our common flowers the amount of nectar is much smaller, usually dilute and in many cases absent ; moreover, in someinstances it appears to be formed only when the essential organs are mature. If in addition the class of sham nectar producers, which is perhaps larger than has been supposed, and previously emptied flowers, as well as those whose nectaries are inaccessible, be taken into account, it will be seen that a great number of fruitless visits must be made by these insects. Bees, however, do not visit any flower at random, but appear to know which flowers are secreting and which are not, on any particular day. Thus, the flowers of Vacemium Myrtillus were thronged with bees while those of Ulex: Europeus were unvisited, on a day when the former were secreting copiously and the latter were quite dry. The extreme solubility and diffusibility of sugar render it necessary that the nectar should be well protected from rain, and various arrange- ments for this purpose are found in flowers—such as the mouth of the flower hang- ing downwards, cushions of hairs, papille, spurs, &c, In the flower of the prim- rose, if the limb of the corolla be covered with water, it will be found that none can penetrate down the corolla-tube to the nectar, on account of the peculiar character of the surface of the petals causing a capillary repulsion. Werethere no such means of protection the sugar would speedily be diffused to parts of the flower where it would be accessible to insects without their being of any service in the way of cross-fertilisation. In the fuchsia, which is rich in nectar, it is to be observed that no nectar is formed before the flower opens, and the amount is greatest at the time when the anthers are ready to dehisce. This in all likelihood happens in other cases where it is more difficult, on account of the smallness of the flowers, to ascertain the conditions. In this flower it is remarkable that three- fourths of the saccharine matter is in the condition of cane or uninyerted sugar. _ Possibly this, taken in connection with the fact that nectaries are not un- frequently aborted or degenerated organs, such as a petal or stamen, may throw some lightfon the question in dispute among physiologists, as to whether nectar should be regarded as a true secretion or simply as an excretion of effete matters from the vegetable cells. It has further a physiological interest, as throwing light on the share which the bee has in elaborating honey, since this substance contains no cane sugar, although on account of the acid reaction of the nectar the process of ° inversion possibly goes on spontaneously. The extensive character of the operations that would appear, from the foregoing considerations, to be performed by insects which collect honey, enables us to form some conception of the importance of this factor, and will help us to judge of the adequacy or efficiency of this cause, which biologists believe to have exercised in past time an important influence in modify- ing the size, form, and colour of flowers, as well as in determining the character, of certain organs of the insects by which such flowers are frequented. 568 REPORT— 1878. 6. Notes on some Dimorphic Plants. By Auex. S. Wison, M.A., B.Sc. This paper had reference to Erythrea centauriwm and Silene acaulis, The author pointed out that the former plant was probably dimorphic, as it exhibited heterostyly and had two kinds of pollen grains, in these respects closely resembling the primrose and bog-bean, as well as several others belonging to the order Gen- tranacee, of which itis a member. Stlene acaulis was shown to have three kinds of flowers, male, female, and hermaphrodite, thus resembling S. inflata, which Axel has shown to be triceciously polygamous. 7. Some Mechanical Arrangements subserving Cross-fertilisation of Plants by Insects. By Aux. 8. Witson, M.A., B.Sc. The plants considered were Pinguicula vulgaris, Vinca minor, and the fox-glove. In Vinca the curiously shaped stigma resembles the stopper of a glass bottle. The circumference of its lower disc secretes a viscid substance which serves to smear the pollen so as to cause it to adhere to insects, thus resembling physiologically the sticky disc of the common orchid, The filaments of the stamens present a curious geniculate bend close to their insertion on the corolla, which acts as a lever when depressed, lowering the anther with its pollen into contact with the viscid matter on the lower part of the stigma. Somewhat similarly a peculiar bend on the fila- ments of the two stamens of Pinguicula, when pressed, causes the anthers to descend so as to impinge onan insect entering the flower, this latch-like mechanism dislodging the pollen from behind the under lip of the semi-petaloid stigma. The remarkable twists and curyings of the filaments of the fox-glove appear to act in a manner exactly analogous, for an insect pressing on their upturned edges as it passes over the floor of the flower must cause a shower of pollen to fall on its back from the overhanging anthers, on account of the disturbance produced by this lever-like mechanism, 8. On the Stipules of Spergularia Marina. By Atnxanper Dickson, M.D., fiegius Professor of Botany in the University of Glasgow. The stipules of this plant exhibit a peculiarity, which, if observed at all by de- scriptive botanists, has not received the attention it deserves on account of its re- markable character. The stipules are free from the petioles, and are wholly cellular in structure. From connation of those of opposite leaves they form “ in- terpetiolar stipules,” with more or less regularly, though slightly, bifid extremities, Lastly (and this is the important point), these stipules are united to each other round the backs of the petioles, so that a sheath is formed completely surrounding the axis and the two leaf-bases. This connation of stipules round the backs of the petioles is very interesting, as being a rare phenomenon, Cases are not uncommon where the two stipules are connate on the inner side of the leaf-base, constituting the so-called “axillary stipule,” é.g., Potamogeton lucens, &c., or on the opposite side of the axis from the leaf, e.g., Ficus elastica, Ricinus, Astragalus alpinus, &c., constituting the so-called “ oppositifoliar stipule ;” hut the only reference to conna- tion of stipules behind or outside the leaf-base the author has been able to find, is to the case of certain species of Astragalus by St. Hilaire in his‘ Morphologie” In those species of Astragalus examined by the author he did not meet with any where the stipules are actually connate in this way ; but in some, e.g., A. alopecuroides, the bases of the stipules extend round the back of the leaf-stalk till they meet—a condition just short of connation. In the stipules of Spergularia, as we have seen, there is the interesting combination of the interpetiolar connation, with connation round the back of the leaf. In‘“‘ English Botany” the condition is fairly enough represented by the artist, but the morphological peculiarity does not hitherto seem to have impressed itself upon the botanical mind. “TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION D.—DEPT. ZOOLOGY AND BOTANY. 4669 9. On the Inflorescence of Senebiera didyma. By Atnxanper Dickson, M.D., Regius Professor of Botany in the University of Glasgow. The inflorescence here, like that of the mass of Cruciferous plants, is racemose. The racemes are “ oppositifoliar,” and at first sight the arrangement seems to be analogous to that of the oppositifoliar inflorescences of Vitis or of Alchemilla arvensis, where the inflorescence is really terminal, but is thrown to the side by a preponderant development of a “ usurping shoot,” the axillary bud of the last leaf produced by the primary axis before ending in the inflorescence ; and it is to be noted that, of all the foliage leaves, that opposite the raceme is the only one ap- parently destitute of an axillary bud, which on the supposition would be represented by the “usurping shoot.” If, however, the plant is more closely examined, a very remarkable condition is disclosed—one, indeed, which offers a morphological pro- blem of considerable difficulty, and which probably can be effectually solved only by developmental study. The peculiarity consists in the constant occurrence of a solitary flower springing somewhere from the internode below the raceme, either about half-way down towards, or almost close to, the level of the leaf below. So far as observed, the solitary flower is never quite so low as the level of the lower leaf. Probably the first idea which would occur to one would be that this is a peculiar case of adhesion of parts; it might be supposed that from almost imme- diately above the second last leaf of the main axis, the bases of the terminal raceme, of the “usurping shoot,” and of the axillant leaf ofthat shoot, had all become fused together. Now, although cases are known, on the one hand, of adhesion between the base of a terminal flower and that of the “ usurping shoot” (e.g., Helianthemum vulgare), and on the other hand between the base of an axillant leaf and that of the usurping shoot in its axil (e.g., Sedum sp.), we do not know of connation of all three together. It is possible, but not probable. The view which seems to the author most fully to satisfy the conditions of this remarkable case may be stated briefly in categorical form as follows:— ist. The racemose inflorescence is terminal, and properly begins just above the level of the “ second-last” leaf. It would tius include the aforesaid solitary flower. 2nd. The raceme, after producing one ebracteate flower, produces at its second node a foliage-leaf, from whose axil the “usurping shoot” springs. By such an explanation we can dispense with any cumbrous adhesion-hypothesis such as that indicated above. The peculiarity is that the main axis does not per saltum pass from the condition of a leafy axis to that of an axis of inflorescence, but begins by producing one flower and then developing a foliage-leaf, beyond which the series of flowers is uninterrupted. The “usurping shoot,” as above indicated, represents the axillary bud of the foliage-leaf by which the raceme is interrupted. 10. On the Siz-celled Glands of Cephalotus, and their similarity to the Glands of Sarracenia purpurea. By AtnxanpeR Dickson, M.D., Regius Pro- fessor of Botany in the University of Glasgow. The author pointed out that the peculiar six-celled glands found on the outer surface of the pitcher, both surfaces of the pitcher-lid, and both surfaces of the foliage-leaf of Cephalotus, are very nearly identical in structure with the glands on both inner and outer surfaces of the pitcher of Sarracenia purpurea, which were originally described by August Vogl. The author suggested that the remarkable .) . . . . . . . _ resemblance in this respect, taken in connection with certain correspondences in the details of the insect-trapping apparatus, might indicate an affinity not hitherto sus- pected. 570 REPORT— 1878. 11. Exhibition of Specimens of Isoetes echinospora. By ALEXANDER DICKSON, M_D., Regius Professor of Botany in the University of Glasgow. Dr. Dickson exhibited specimens referable to this species which he had lately found growing on muddy bottom, among Potwmogeton, in about two feet of water in Loch Oallater, Aberdeenshire. The plants were remarkable for the very slender and tapering character of the leayes, which curve outwardly. The macrospores are very markedly echinate, and in diameter about one-fourth smaller than those of Isoetes lacustris. 12. Some rare Scottish Alpine Plants. By Dr. J. Baytny Banrour. Specimens of some peculiar form of Scottish Alpine plants were exhibited— chiefly willows, sedges, and hawkweeds. Of the willows, the most interesting was Sadler’s willow (Salia Sadleri, Syme). This plant was discovered in 1874 by Mr. Sadler, on the rocks at the head of Loch Kander, Aberdeenshire. Since that date it has never been collected. In August of the present year Mr. Sadler, revisiting Loch Kander, found it in fair abundance, the specimens exhibited being of his gathering. Of the other plants that were worthy of notice was Carex frigida, All. This sedge—a novelty in the British flora—was found by Mr. Sadler, in 1874, near the spot where he discovered Salix Sadlerii, Syme. Since then it has not been gathered, until this year Mr. Sadler again obtained some good specimens at the original locality. The chief interest in this plant centres in its being a rare instance of a non-Scandinavian plant inhabiting the Scottish Alps. 13. Notes on Naiadacee. By Dr. J. Baytey Batrovur. Matis TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION D.—DEPT. ZOOLOGY AND BOTANY. 4571 TUESDAY, AUGUST 20, 1878. The following Papers were read :— 1. The Vertebrata of the Permian Formation of Texas. By Professor Epwarp D. Cops, S.A. 2. Note on the Genus Holopus. By Sir Wryvittn Tomson. 3. Note on some Deep Sea Radiolarians. By Sir Wryvitte THomson. 4, On the genus Ctenodus (Agassiz). By Dr. R. H. Traquair. 5. The Mammoth in Siberia. By Henry H. Howorru, F.S.A. The existence of the carcases of mammoths and rhinoceroses in Siberia, with their. flesh and other soft parts intact, presents a problem which has not been hitherto satisfactorily solved. There are two theories current as to the means by which they came there. One is that they were floated down the great Siberian rivers from more tropical countries, and the other that they lived where their remains are now found. The former has now few adherents save perhaps Middendorf. The nature of the rivers; the fact that it would be impossible for such masses of flesh to float down them for hundreds of miles without being broken to pieces; the fact that they are found standing upright, that we have specimens of the remains of their food and the outward woolly covering of their bodies, are a few of the facts which conclusively show that théy were not floated down the rivers. The remain-~ ing alternative which is now almost universally held, that they lived where their remains are found, necessitates another postulate, however. It is quite clear that neither elephant nor rhinoceros could live under the conditions which now prevail on the tundras bordering the Arctic Ocean; the terrible climate, the absence of trees and the universal covering of snow for a large part of the year makes it clear, @ priort, that there must have been a change of climate in Siberia since they lived, and this is largely supported by the existence of traces of woods, and remains of a more southern vegetation, far to the north of the present limit of trees; and it seems clear that a temperate climate prevailed all over Siberia when the mammoths lived there. But there is another difficulty, which, so far as the author knew, has not hitherto been noticed. The fact of the flesh of these animals having been preserved intact, proves that they must have been frozen immediately after death, and re- mained frozen ever since. If the ground had thawed even during one summer, they would have decayed and been dissipated. Again, as they were buried in earth and mud, it is clear that when so buried the ground must have been soft. It is impossible to conceive of large masses of flesh being pushed underground if the earth was frozen fast, as it is over all Northern Siberia, from two feet below the surface. It follows, therefore, that the change of climate was sudden, was in fact in the nature of a catastrophe; and this is supported by the fact of the mammoths 572 REPORT—1878. and their associated companions being found in such hecatombs, while, as is familiar to travellers, the remains of modern elephants which have died in the forests are seldom found. This accounts also largely for the flesh of the huge beasts not haying been torn and eaten by their carnivorous contemporaries. This conclusion seems at issue with much modern geological speculation, which rather shrinks from postulating catastrophes, but it nevertheless appears to be inevitable. 6. Recent Additions to the List of Irish Lepidoptera. By R. W. SInctatr. 7. A Wryneck obtained in Ireland was exhibited by A. B. Jacos. 8. Germinating specimens of Cardamine pratensis were exhibited by Dr. JoHN PRIce. Y a TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION D.—DEPT. ANTHROPOLOGY. 573 Dwi DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY. CHAIRMAN OF THE DEPARTMENT—Professor Huxley, {PH.D., LL,D., SEC. R.S., F.G.S. THURSDAY, AUGUST 15, 1878. The Department did not meet. FRIDAY, AUGUST 16, 1878. Professor HuxLzy gave the following Address:— WuaeEn I undertook, with the greatest possible pleasure, to act as a lieutenant of my friend the President of this Section, I steadfastly purposed to confine myself to. the modest and useful duties of that position. For reasons, with which it is not worth while to trouble you, I did not propose to follow the custom which has grown up in the Association of delivering an address upon the occasion of taking the chair of a section or department. In clear memory of the admirable addresses which you have had the privilege of hearing from Professor Flower, and just now from Dr. McDonnell, I cannot doubt that that practice is a very good one; though I would venture to say, to use a term of philosophy, that it looks very much better from an objective than from a subjective point of view. But I found that my re- solution, like a great many good resolutions that I have made in the course of my life, came to very little, and that it was thought desirable that I should address you insome way. But I must beg of you to understand that this is no formal address. T have simply announced it as a few introductory remarks, and I must ask you to - forgive whatever of crudity and imperfection there may be in the mode of expres- sion of what I have to say, although naturally I shall do my best to take care that there is neither crudity nor inaccuracy in the substance of it. It has occurred to me that I might address myself to a point in connection with the business of this de- partment which forces itself more or less upon the attention of everybody, and which, unless the bellicose instincts of human nature are less marked on this side of St. George’s Channel than on the other, may possibly have something to do with the large audiences we are always accustomed to see in the Anthropological De- partment. In the Geological Section I have no doubt it will be pointed out to you, or, at any rate, such knowledge may crop up incidentally, that there are on the earth’s surface what are called Joc of disturbance, where, for long ages, cataclysms and outbursts of lava and the like take place. Then everything subsides into quie- tude ; but a similar disturbance isset up elsewhere. In Antrim, at the middle of the tertiary epoch, there was such a great centre of physical disturbance. We all know that at the present time the earth’s crust, at any rate, is quiet in Antrim, while the great centres of local disturbance are in Sicily, in Southern Italy, in the Andes, and elsewhere. My experience of the British Association does not extend quite over a geological epoch, but it does go back rather longer than I care to think about; and when I first new the British Association, the Jocus of disturbance in it was the Geological Section, All sorts of terrible things about the antiquity of the earth, 574 REPORT—1878,. and I know not what else, were being said there, which gave rise to terrible appre- hensions. The whole world, it was thought, was coming to an end, just as I have no doubt that, if there were any human inhabitants of Antrim in the middle of the tertiary epoch, when those great lava streams burst out, they would not have had the smallest question that the whole universe was going to pieces. Well, the universe has not gone to pieces. Antrim is, geologically speaking, a very quiet place now, as well cultivated a place as one need see, and yielding abundance of ex- cellent produce ; and so, if we turn to the Geological Section, nothing can be milder than the proceedings of that admirable body. All the difficulties that they seemed to have encountered at first have died away, and statements that were the horrible paradoxes of‘ that generation are now the commonplaces of schoolboys. At present the locus of disturbance is to be found in the Biological Section, and more par- ticularly in the anthropological department of that Section. History repeats it- self, and precisely the same apprehensions which were expressed by the aborigines of the Geological Section, in long far back time, are at present expressed by those who attend our deliberations. The world is coming to anend, the basis of morality is being shaken, and I don’t know what is not to happen if certain conclusions which appear probable are to be verified. Well, now, whoever may be here thirty years hence—I certainly shall not be—but, depend upon it, whoever may be speaking at the meeting of this department of the British Association thirty years hence will find, exactly as the members of the Geological Section have found, on looking back thirty years, that the very paradoxes and horrible conclusions, things that are now thought to be going to shake the foundations of the world, will by that time have become parts of every-day knowledge and will be taught in our schools as accepted truth, and nobody will be one whit the worse. The considerations which I think it desirable to put before you, in order to show the foundations of this conviction at which I have very confidently arrived, are of two kinds. ‘The first is a reason based entirely upon philosophical considerations, namely, this—that the region of pure physical science, and the region of those ques- . tions which specially interest ordinary humanity, are apart, and that the conclusions reached in the one have no direct effect in the other. If you acquaint yourself with the history of philosophy, and with the endless variations of human opinion therein recorded, you will find that there is not a single one of those speculative difficulties which at the present time torment many minds as being the direct product of scientific thought, which is not as old as the times of Greek philosophy, and which did not then exist as strongly and as clearly as such difficulties exist now, though they arose out of arguments based upon merely philosophical ideas. "Whoever ad- mits these two things—as everybody who looks about him must do—whoever takes into account the existence of eyil in this world and the law of causation—has before him all the difficulties that can be raised by any form of scientific speculation. And these two difficulties have been occupying the minds of men ever since man began to think. The other consideration I have to put before you is that, whatever may be the results at which physical science as applied to man shall arrive, those results are inevitable—I mean that they arise out of the necessary progress of scientific thought as applied to man. You all, I hope, had the opportunity of hearing the excellent address which was given by our President yesterday, in which he traced out the marvellous progress of our knowledge of the higher animals which has been effected since the time of Linnzeus. It is no exaggeration to say that at this present time the merest tyro knows a thousand times as much on the subject as is contained in the work of Linnzus, which was then the standard authority. Now how has that been brought about? If you consider what zoology, or the study of animals, signifies, you will see that it means an endeavour to ascertain all that can be studied, all the answers that can be given respecting any animal under four possible points of view. The first of these embraces considerations of structure. An aimal has a certain structure and a certain mode of development, which means that it passes through a series of stages to that structure. In the second place, every animal exhibits a great number of active powers, the knowledge of which constitutes its physiology ; and under those active powers we have, as physiologists, not only to include such matters as have been referred to by Dr. M‘Donnell in his observations, but to take into account other kinds of activity. I see it announced that the Zoological b ~~ @ ———E————eOo TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION D.—DEPT. ANTHROPOLOGY. 575 Section of to-day is to have a highly interesting paper by Sir John Lubbock on the habits of ants. Ants have a polity, and exhibit a certain amount of intelligence, and all these matters are proper subjects for the study of the zoologist as far as he deals with the ant. There is yet a third point of view in which you mayregard every animal. It hasa distribution. Not only is it to be found somewhere on the earth’s surface, but alzeontology tells us, if we go back in time, that the great majority of animals have had a past history—that they occurred in epochs of the world’s history far removed from the present. And when we have acquired all that Inowledge which we may enumerate under the heads of anatomy, physiology, and distribution, there remains still the problem of problems to the zoologist, which is the study of the causes of those phenomena, in order that we may know how they came about. All these different forms of Imowledge and inquiry are legitimate subjects for science, there being no subject which is an illegitimate subject for scientific inquiry, except such as involves a contradiction in terms, or is itself absurd. Indeed, I don’t know that I ought to go quite so far as this at present, for undoubtedly there are many be- nighted persons who have been in the habit of calling by no less hard names con- ceptions which the President of this Meeting tells us must be regarded with much re- spect. If we have four dimensions of space we may have forty dimensions, and that would be a long way beyond that which is conceivable by ordinary powers of imagina- tion. I should, therefore, not like to draw too closely the limits as to what may be contradiction to the best-established principles. Now, let us turn to a proposition which no one can possibly deny—namely, that there isa distinct sense in which man is ananimal. There is not the smallest doubt of that proposition. If anybody entertains a misgiving on that point he has simply to walk through.the museum close by, in order to see that man has a structure and a framework which may be compared, point for point and bone for bone, with those of the lower animals. ‘There is not the smallest doubt moreover that, as to the manner of his becoming, man is developed, step by step, in exactly the same way astheyare. There is not the smallest doubt that his activities—not only his mere bodily functions, but his other functions—are just as much the subjects of scientific study as are those of ants or bees. What we call the phenomena of intelligence, for example (as to what else there may be in them, the anthropologist makes no assertion)—are phenomena following a definite casual order just as capable of scientific examination, and of being reduced to defi- nite law, as are all those phenomena which we call physical. Just as ants forma polity and a social state, and just as these are the proper and legitimate study of the zoologist, so far as he deals with ants; so do men organise themselves into a social state. And though the province of politics is of course outside that of anthropology, yet the consideration of man, so far as his instincts lead him to construct a social economy, is a legitimate and proper part of anthropology, precisely in the same way as the study of the social state of ants is a legitimate object of zoology. So with re- gard to other and more subtle phenomena. It has often been disputed whether in animals there is any trace of the religious sentiment. That is a legitimate subject of dispute and of inquiry ; and if it were possible for my friend Sir John Lubbock to point out to you that ants manifest such sentiments he would have made a very great and interesting discovery, and no one could doubt that the ascertainment of such a fact was completely within the province of zoology. Anthropology has nothing to do with the truth or falsehood of religion—it holds itself absolutely and entirely aloof from such questions—but the natural history of religion, and the origin and the growth of the religions entertained by the different kinds of the human race, are within its proper and legitimate province. I now goa step farther, and pass to the distribution of man. Here, of course, the anthropologist is in his special region. He endeavours to ascertain how various modifications of the human stock are arranged upon the earth’s surface. He looks back to the past, and inquires how far the remains of man can be traced. It is just as legitimate to ascertain how far the human race goes back in time as it is to ascertain how far the horse goes back in time ; the kind of evidence that is good in the one case is good in the other; and the conclusions that are forced on us in the one case are forced on us in the other also. Finally, we come to the question of the causes of all these phenomena, which, if permissible in the case of other animals, is permissible in the animal man. What- ever evidence, whatever chain of reasoning justifies us in concluding that the horse, re) 576 REPORT— 1878. for example, has come into existence in a certain fashion in time, the same evidence and the same canons of logic justify us to precisely the same extent in drawing the same kind of conclusions with regard to man. And it is the business of the anthro- pologist to be as severe in his criticism of those matters in respect to the origin of man as it is the business of the paleontologist to be strict in regard to the origin of the horse ; but for the scientific man there is neither more nor less reason for dealing critically with the one case than with the other. Whatever evidence is satisfactory in one case is satisfactory in the other; and if any one should travel outside thelines of scientific evidence, and endeavour either to support or oppose conclusions which are based upon distinctly scientific grounds, by considerations which are not in any way based upon scientific logic or scientific truth—whether that mode of ad- vocacy was in favour of a given position, or whether it was against it, I, occupying the chair of the Section, should, most undoubtedly, feel myself called upon to call him to order, and to tell him that he was introducing topics with which we had no concern whatever. I have occupied your attention fora considerable time; yet there is still one other point respecting which I should like to say a few words, because some very striking reflections arise out of it. The British Association met in Dublin twenty- one years ago, and I have taken the pains to look up what was done in regard to our subject at that period. Atthat time there was no Anthropological Department. That study had not yet differentiated itself from zoology, or anatomy, or physiology, so as to claim for itself a distinct place. Moreover, without reverting needlessly to the remarks which I placed before you some time ago, it was a very volcanic subject, and people rather liked to leave it alone. It was not until a long time subsequently that the present organisation of this section of the Association was brought about ; but it is a curious fact, that although truly anthropological subjects were at the time brought before the Geographical Section—with the proper subject of which they had nothing whatever to do—I find, that even then, more than half of the papers that were brought before that section were, more or less distinctly, of an anthropological cast. Itis very curious to observe what that cast was. We had systems of language—we had descriptions of savage races—we had the great question, as it then was thoucht, of the unity or multiplicity of the human species. These were just touched upon, but there was not an allusion in the whole of the proceedings of the Association, at that time, to those questions which are now to be regarded as the burning questions of anthropology. The whole tendency in the present direction was given by the publication of a single book, and that not a very large one—namely, ‘The Origin of Species.’ It was only subsequent to the pub- lication of the ideas contained in that book that one of the most powerful instru- ments for the advance of anthropological knowledge—namely, the Anthropological Society of Paris—was founded. Afterwards the Anthropological Institute of this country and the great Anthropological Society of Berlin came into existence, until it may be said that, at the present time, there is not a branch of science which is represented by a larger or more active body of workers than the science of anthro- pology. But the whole of these workers are engaged, more or less intentionally, in providing the data for attacking the ultimate great problem, whether the ideas which Darwin has put forward in regard to the animal world are capable of being applied in the same sense and to the same extent to man. That question, I need not say, is not answered. It is a vast and difficult question, and one for which a complete answer may possibly be looked for ia the next century ; but the method of inquiry is understood; and the mode in which the materials bearing on that inquiry are now being accumulated, the processes by which results are now obtained, and the observation of new phenomena lead to the belief that the problem also, some day or other, will be solved. In what sense I cannot tell you. 1 have my own notion about it, but the question for the future is the attainment, by scientific processes and methods, of the solution of that question. If you ask me what has been done within the last twenty-one years towards this object, or rather towards clearing the ground in the direction of obtaining a solution, I don’t know that I could lay my hand upon much of a very * definite character—except as to methods of investigation—save in regard to one point. I have some reason to know that about the year 1860, at any rate, there TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION D.—DEPT. ANTHROPOLOGY. 577 was nothing more volcanic, more shocking, more subversive of everything right and proper, than to put forward the proposition that as far as physical organisation is concerned there is less difference between man and the highest apes than there is between the highest apes and the lowest. My memory carries me back sufficiently to remind me that, in 1860, that question was not a pleasant one to handle. The other day I was reading a recently-published valuable and in- teresting work, ‘L’Espéce Humaine,’ by a very eminent man, M. de Quatre- fages. He is a gentleman who has made these questions his special study, and has written a great deal and very well about them. He has always maintained a temperate and fair position, and has been the opponent of evolutionary ideas, so that I turned with some interest to his work as giving mea record of what I could look on as the progress of opinion during the last twenty years. If he has any bias at all, it is one in the opposite direction to that in which my own studies would lead me. I cannot quote his words, for I have not the book with me, but the substance of them is that the proposition which I have just put before you is one the truth of which no rational person acquainted with the facts could dispute. Such is the difference which twenty years has made in that respect, and speaking in the presence of a great number of anatomists, who are quite able to decide a uestion of this kind, I believe that the opinion of M. de Quatrefages on the sub- ject is one they will all be prepared to endorse. Well, it is a comfort to have got that much out of the way. The second direction in which I think great progress has been made is with respect to the processes of anthropometry, in other words, in the modes of obtaining those data which are necessary for anthropologists to reason upon. Like all other persons who have to deal with physical science, we confine ourselves to matters which can be ascertained with precision, and nothing is more remarkable than the exactness which has been introduced into the mode of ascertaining the physical qualities of man within the last twenty-five years. One cannot mention the name of Broca without the greatest gratitude; and I am quite sure that, when Professor Flower brings forward his paper on cranial measurements on Monday next, you will be surprised to see what precision of method and what accuracy are now introduced, compared with what existed twenty-five years ago, into these methods of determining the facts of man’s structure. If, further, we turn to those physiological matters bearing on anthropology which have been the subject of inquiry within the last score of years, we find that there has been a vast amount of progress. I would refer you to the very remarkable collection of the data of sociology by Mr. Herbert Spencer, which contains a mass of information useful on one side or the other, in getting towards the truth. Then I would refer you to the highly interesting contributions which have been made by Professor Max Miller and by Mr. Tylor to the natural history of religions, which is one of the most interesting chapters of anthropology. In regard to another very impor- tant topic, the development of art and the use of tools and weapons, most remark- able contributions have been made by General Lane Fox, whose museum at Bethnal Green is one of the most extraordinary exemplifications that I know of the inge- nuity, and, at the same time, of the stupidity of the human race. Their ingenuity appears in their invention of a given pattern or form of weapon, and their profound stupidity in this, that having done so, they kept in the old grooves, and were thus prevented from getting beyond the primitive type of these objects and of their orna- mentation. One of the most singular things in that museum is the exemplification of the wonderful tendency of the human mind when once it has got into a groove to stick there. The great object of scientific investigation is to run counter to that tendency. Great progress has been made in the last twenty years in the direction of the discovery of the indications of man ina fossil state. My memory goes back to _ the time when anybody who broached the notion of the existence of fossil man would have been simply laughed at. It was held to be a canon of paleontology that man could not exist in a fossil state. I don’t know why, but it was so; and that fixed idea acted so strongly on men’s minds that they shut their eyes to the plainest possible evidence. Within the last twenty years we have an astonishing _ accumulation of evidence of the existence of man in ages antecedent to those of et we have any historical record. What the actual date of those times was, ° er) 578 REPORT—1878. and what their relation is to our known historical epochs, I don’t think anybody is in a position to say. But it is beyond all question that man, and not only man, but what is more to the purpose, intelligent man, existed at times when the whole physical conformation of the country was totally different from that which characterises it now. Whether the evidence we now possess justifies us in going back further or not, that we can get back as far as the epoch of the drift is, I think, beyond any rational doubt; that may be regarded as something settled. But when it comes to a question as to the evidence of tracing back man further than that—and recollect the drift is only the scum of the earth’s surface—I must confess that, to my mind, the evidence is of a very dubious character. Finally, we come to the very interesting question—as to whether, with such evidence of the existence of man in those times as we have before us, it is possible to trace in that brief history any evidence of the gradual modification from a human type somewhat different from that which now exists to that which is met with at present. I must confess that my opinion remains exactly what it was some eighteen years ago, when I published a little book which I was very sorry to hear my friend, Professor Flower, allude to yesterday, because I had hoped that it would have been forgotten amongst the greater scandals of subsequent times. I did there put forward the opinion that what is known as the Neanderthal skull is, of human remains, that which presents the most marked and definite charac- teristics of a lower type—using the language in the same sense as we would use it in other branches of zoology. I believe it to belong to the lowest form of human being of which we have any knowledge, and we know from the remains accompanying that human being, that as far as all fundamental points of structure were concerned, he was as much a man—could wear boots just as easily—as any of us,so that I think the question remains pretty much where it was. I don’t know that there is any reason for doubting that the men who existed at that day were in all essential respects similar to the men who exist now. But I must point out to you that this conviction is by no means inconsistent with the doctrine of evolution. The horse, which existed at that time, was in all essential respects identical with the horse which exists now. But we happen to know that going back further in time the horse presents us with a series of modifications by which it can be traced back from an earlier type. Therefore it must be deemed possible that man is in the same position, although the facts we have before us with respect to him tell in neither one way nor the other. I have now nothing more to do than to thank you for the great kindness and attention with which you have listened to these informal remarks. The following Papers were read :— 1. Notes on the Prehistoric Monwmnents of Cornwall as compared with those in Ireland. By Miss A. W. Buckuanp. The prehistoric monuments of Cornwall, believed by archeologists to be the work of the same race as those of Ireland, present, in the midst of strong resemblance, certain points of difference, which deserve the attention not only of archeologists but of ethnologists. In both countries they consist of tumuli, including chambered barrows and giants’ graves—monoliths or menhirs, circles, cromlechs or dolmens, and holed-stones, all probably sepulchral ; and hut-circles, cliff-castles, curious caves and crosses, whilst in Ireland we find in addition earthworks called raths and round towers. Long barrows, which are looked upon as the most ancient of burial places, belonging to the stone age, are wanting in both countries, hence we may infer that the people who erected them in England and Scotland never inhabited Cornwall and Iveland, where the earliest barrows seem to belong to the Bronze age, the mode of interment in Cornwall being chiefly by cremation; but these tumuli may not represent the earliest tombs in these countries. Sir William Wilde believes that the earliest premetallic Irish were the erectors of gigantic cromlechs covered with earth, whilst the menhirs in both countries are very ancient memorials of the dead, although not always covering a grave, the “ Pipers ” in Cornwall being of the latter class. Some of these menhirs were afterwards converted to Christian uses, whilst some in Ireland bear Ogham inscriptions. The circles in Cornwall are ea ieee Mas TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION D.—DEPT. ANTHROPOLOGY. 579 «small as compared to those of Stonehenge and Avebury. Nine exist in the extreme West of Cornwall, but no avenues are traceable in connection with them, the same fact having been observed of some of the Irish examples; the Cornish consist generally of nineteen stones. The cromlechs of Cornwall are of the free-standing order, but -seem to follow no special rule as to the number of stones composing them. The chambered tumuli and giants’ graves do not equal in size the great pyramids of Dowth and New Grange, although of the same general construction. "The holed “stones of Cornwall, which vary greatly in form and size, have their counterparts in Treland, Scotland, and France, but the men-an-tol seems unique; their use is unknown, but in Cornwall and in Ireland they have a reputation as healing agents. From the ~difference in shape and size they could hardly have served as doors to dolmens, like _the Indian examples, but probably were associated with the God of Healing. Of non-sepulchral monuments the beehive huts form animportant part. Several groups exist in Cornwall, apparently identical with the Irish cloughans in Kerry and Arran. The Cornish cliff-castles and Irish raths are both ascribed to the Danes, but they differ essentially in construction, the Irish rath consisting of earthwork only, whilst the Cornish cliff-castles are three or four circles of uncemented stones heaped together to form walls. The crosses of Cornwall, with few exceptions, seem older and ruder than those of Ireland, and bear no inscriptions in Ogham, although there are -on some hieroglyphic markings, but it is noteworthy that the Irish round towers do not appear in Cornwall, although traditions of Irish saints are numerous there. All these monuments are generally ascribed to the Celts, but this is probably an error, “since maps showing the distribution of these remains prove that in most countries they follow certain lines, indicating the migrations of different tribes or races. The -great cromlechs of Ireland are found chiefly on the coast, and similar groupings occur in almost every country, so that a map of the world wherein these are clearly marked would be a great boon to ethnologists. Two distinct types of skull, the one do- licocephalic, the other brachycephalic; are found associated with the Irish remains, and although both are assumed to be Celtic, the term seems inapplicable to both. The constructors of similar monuments in India belong to the dark-skinned pre- Aryan stock. Attention to the distribution, position with regard to the cardinal points, and the number of stones forming these monuments, is of considerable im- portance, and also their constant occurrence in bog or waste land. Their position appears to the author to have some connection with the point from which their builders first emigrated, and the rude hieroglyphs on some, to denote the tribal marks or totems of deceased chiefs. 2. Flint Factories at Portstewart and elsewhere in the North of Ireland. By W. J. Kyow es. Since this subject was brought forward at the Glasgow meeting there have been found at Portstewart, besides additional flint implements and beads, some lumps of orous lava, of the nature of pumice,‘and a few small flakes of obsidian. The lava ds rounded by waterwearing and floats on water, and the flakes or chips of obsidian have bulbs of percussion. It is supposed that these substances are not native pro- -ductions, but that the lava, with obsidian attached, may have been carried by currents from a distance, and cast ashore at Portstewart. Sandhills near Castlerock, County Londonderry, and at Whitepark Bay, near Ballintoy, were examined, and similar objects to those found at Portstewart were obtained. At Whitepark Bay, which was the richer of the two, many hundreds of flint implements were found, together with an oval toolstone, bone pins, bored and eut bones, hammer-stones, cores, flakes, broken pottery, broken and split bones, -teeth, and shells. Blackish layers representing the ancient surface are to be seen like those at Portstewart. The layers vary from about three to twelve inches in thickness, and the objects are found imbedded in them, except where they are set free by denudation. Twenty or thirty feet of sand protected by close vegetation rests on the layers on some places, while in others the covering is removed, but the layer which is pretty solid and coherent has resisted the action of the wind and still remains. PP2 580 REPORT—1878. The animal remains as determined by Professor A. Leith Adams, F.R.S., were found to contain those of man, horse, ox, dog or wolf, fox, deer, and hog. Flint factories are also found at Larne and other places round the coast. Some are also found inland at a distance from the places where a supply of flint could be- obtained. In one of these inland places on the banks of the Bann, near Portglenone, several flint implements were found approaching the form known as paleolithic— all having a thick base for holding in the hand and a cutting point—and it was thought strange that these, like the palzolithic implements of large size as men- tioned in Evan’s “ Stone Implements,” should be found mainly in connection with rivers. Our best authorities believe that all the stone implements found in Ireland are of Neolithic age. It is not known that any extinct animal, such as the mam- moth and Irish Elk, has been found asssociated with flint implements in Ireland, but the implements from the Bann were found in the diatomaceous deposit below the peat where remains of Irish Elk are usually found, and well-marked flakes have- been found at considerable depths from the surface in the raised beach at Larne, and there is at present in possession of the Rey. Dr. Grainger, M.R.I.A., of Broughshane,. County Antrim, a mammoth’s tooth found near Larne,* These facts, it was thought, were sufficient at least to create a suspicion in our minds that some of the Irish stone implements might be found to be older than the Neolithic age. 3. The Prehistoric Sculptures of Ilkley, Yorkshire. By J. Rommiy ALLEN. Treland is a country rich in sculptures of the prehistoric period, and it is most important to science that the comparative method should be applied to this branch of research, The object in bringing the subject before the British Association at Dublin is to enable the Yorkshire examples here described to be compared with those found in Ireland. The particular type of .sculpture dealt with in the follow- ing paper is known as “ cup-and-ring marking.” _ Sculptures of this description were discovered in the North of England in 1825, and subsequently in Scotland, Ireland, Brittany, and Wales. The most valuable addition to the information already collected was made in 1877 by Mr. Rivett-Carnac, who found cup-and-ring marks, identical with the ones of this country, amongst the Kamaon Hills in India. The meaning of the symbols is fully understood by the natives, and is supposed to have reference to “ Zingam” worship. Cup-and-ring marks in Great Britain are in- timately connected with the burial rites, and therefore probably with the religious ceremonies of the ancient inhabitants of this country, since the symbols are fre- quently found carved on the stones of sepulchral circles and chambers, and on the cover stones of cinerary urns. A full investigation of the subject may be the means of throwing great light on the nature of the religion which preceded Chris- tianity in this country. Examples of prehistoric sculpture from different localities should be carefully compared. The remnants of Paganism incorporated in the superstitions of remote districts and found mixed with the ceremonies of the Christian church should be critically examined. The most successful method of conducting such researches is to work steadily backward from the historic period to the prehistoric, tracing the gradual course of development to its source. The remainder of the paper is deyoted to a description of the magnificent group of cup-and-ring sculptures found on rocks in the neighbourhood of Ilkley, in York- shire. 4. Report of the Earth-works Committee ; being an account of Excavations im Cesar’s Camp, Folkestone.—Major-General Lane Fox, F.R.S., regrets that it has not been possible to complete this report in time for the present volume. 5 On Excavations at Mount Caburn, Lewes, Sussex. By Major-General Lanz Fox, F.R.S. * See Dr. Grainger’s paper, Transactions of Sections, 1874. p. 73. TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION D.—DEPT. ANTHROPOLOGY. 581 SATURDAY, AUGUST 17, 1878. This Department did not meet. MONDAY, AUGUST 19, 1878. The following Papers were read :— 1. Methods and Results of Measurements of the Capacity of Human Crania. By Wit1am Henry Frower, F.2.S. The capacity of the cavity of the cranium is one of its most important measurements, and at the same time one of the most difficult to ascertain. The results of about three thousand experiments were given in this communication. Two methods had been chiefly employed—1l. That of Broca, as described in his memoir Sur la Mensuration de la Capacité du Crane, Mém. de la Société d’An- thropologie, T. 1** (2° Série), Paris 1873; the material used being leaden shot. 2. That of Busk, “Note on a ready method of measuring the capacity of skulls,” “Journ. Anthrop. Inst.,” vol. iii. p. 200. In both the author has had the advantage of the personal explanations and instructions of their respective in- ventors. When thiccs two methods were used to measure the same skulls, the author found that the first invariably gave a larger capacity than the second, amounting generally to as much as 3 or 4 cubic inches. To ascertain which, or whether, either was absolutely correct, test skulls, prepared by stopping the larger apertures with wax, and impregnating the bone tissue with melted paraffin to make it impervious to fluids were employed. In these the capacity could be ascertained with exactness by means either of mercury or water. In a skull so prepared, Broca’s method of mensuration gave 70 cubic centimetres above the real capacity, Busk’s 10 to 15, A slight modification of the last, using mustard seed, and taking every care to fill both the cranium and the choremometer to the utmost by repeated shakings, gave very accurate results. The details of the method ‘(which cannot be described in an abstract) were demonstrated to the audience. The results of the measurement of the collection of about a thousand crania in the Museum of the Royal College of Surgeons of England were then described, but their value as affording the data for comparing different races was not great, owing to the insufficient numbers of each race available for comparison, as all immature skulls, ¢.e. those in which the basal suture was not closed, were rejected in the averages, and the sexes were carefully separated. To ascertain the influence of sex, all the skulls of whatever race in the collection in which the sex is abso- lutely known from other evidence than that presented by the skull itself, were measured with the following result :—Sixty-three skulls of Inown males have an average of 1433 cubic centimetres. Twenty-four skulls of known females have -an average of 1224 cubic centimetres, giving the proportion of 1000 to 854. The largest normal skull in the collection is 2075; it is that of an Englishman of unknown history ; the smallest, a female Vedda, measures 960 cubic centimetres. The following are the averages of male skulls only, expressed in cubic centimetres, the numbers of the skulls measured being placed in brackets. The insufficiency of amany of these will be obvious, but they may serve as approximations. With 582 REPORT—1878. regard to the higher races, especially the English, it must be noted that the skulls examined are those of the least intellectually developed portion of the community, while with some of the lower races, it may be rather the reverse. The general’ order in which the races are placed does not differ greatly from that of the tables. of Barnard Davis and Broca; but the actual capacities are all smaller, especially than those of the latter author,owing to the difference of the method of measure- ment employed. West Coast of North America, mostly deformed (7), 1589; Lapps (4), 1569; Ancient Italian (11), 1558; Eskimo (17), 1546; Modern Greek (9), 1546; English (17), 1542; Guanches (6), 1498; Japanese (6), 1486; Kaffirs (7), 1485; Modern Italians (74), 1475; Ancient Egyptians (8), 1464: Polynesians (18), 1454: Malays (17), 1482; Chinese (16), 1424; African Negroes of various tribes (26), 1877 ; Peruvians (47), 1545; Melanesians (30), 1318; Tasmanians (6),. 1309; Hindoos (28), 1306; Australians (26), 1285; Andamanese (4), 1220; Veddas (3), 1208. ; 2. Report of the Anthropometric Committee—See Reports, p. 152. 3. Ona Colour Scale. By KE. W. Brasroox. Having regard to Professor Broca’s types of colour of eyes, hair, and skin adopted by the Association in their ‘Notes and Queries on Anthropology,’ and to the selec- tionmade from those types by the Anthropometric Committee, the writer drew attention toa very comprehensive scale of colours lately published by the Société Stenochromique- of Paris, given to him by Dr. Paul Topinard, as affording a step towards universal scientific language on the matter. The scale comprises forty-two colours and about twenty shades of each, altogether more than 800 shades. ‘The writer attempted to identify Broca’s types of eye-colour with some of the shades of colours 4, 10, 12, 13, 18, 19, 33 and 34 in the scale; and his types of hair and skin colour with some of those of 3, 4, 5,6, 52, 33, 34 and 35—showing thata comparatively limited range. would suffice for all practical purposes in anthropology, 4, Left-handedness. By Henry Murrueap, M.D. The writer directed attention chiefly to the seeming hereditariness of left-handed= ness in some families instancing his own as one in which he had been unable to trace- a single instance of left-handedness. Contrasted with this he gave statistics of a family (named White) in Cambuslang for a period of 123 years. Of the individuals of this family so far as accurately known thirty-four used the right hand and nine the left s. nearly twenty-one per cent. Information as to the other members could not be relied on. Only one of the nine married and had children whose right and left-handedness- was known (she had five children two of them left-handed) so that in the majority of the instances given the parent was not left-handed. In all cases measured ‘by the- writer, left-handed individuals have the left foot from one-third to one-eichth of an inch longer than the right. The converse of this is usual in right-handed people. Right-handed people in looking with one eye (the other being shut) use the right. All left-handed femates, so far as hitherto scrutinized, use the left. Of left-handed males examined only two out of fourteen used the left eye. TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION D.—DEPT. ANTHROPOLOGY. 583 5. On the Evils arising from the use of Historical National Names as Scientific Terms. By A. L, Lewis. The propositions endeavoured to be established by the author were: (1) That there were at the first population of Europe certain primitive races, (of which three were particularly described); (2) that these races are so mixed at the present day that representatives of them appear not only in most European nations, but in the same families, and among children of the same parents; (3) that notwithstanding this mixture, and the effects which it must permanently have, racial characters display an astonishing permanence ; (4) that this mixture, being so slow in its effects, and yet having become so general, has probably been at work for a very great length of time, so great that the peoples to whom the earliest history of Europe introduces us were probably nearly as much mixed as those of the present day ; (5) that it is de- sirable to diseontinue the use of the political names of those peoples as ethnic names, and to employ others based on the physical characteristics of the individual ; (6). that while physical characteristics are the only basis for a true division into races, yet in any practical application of this division the influence upon individuals of different races of a community of language, custom, history, or tradition must not be lost sight of, although these things do not prove community of race, but only the contact at some time or other of the races to whom they are now common, 6. On some American Illustrations of new Varieties of Man. By Professor DanteL Witson, LL.D. 7. On the Courses of Migration and Commerce, traced by Art Relics and Religious Emblems. By J. S. Puen, LL.D., F.S.A. In this paper references were first made to some remarkable sculptures of the oldest historical notice, existing in the mountains of Asia Minor, particularly the “Niobe” of Homer, on Mount Sipylus, and the Sesostris figure at Nymphio, and subsequently, to the various colossal and other rock-hewn sculptures in the Sporades and Cyclades, having affinity, by similarity of style, to those of Asia Minor. It was then mentioned that according to Strabo, tradition showed that the religion of this part of Asia Minor was transferred to the south of Gaul, in the ancient city of Mas- silia, now Marseilles, and thence consequently it spread over the west of Europe. That this religion brought with it the idea of the colossal in representation, which Peectly accounts for the ancient colossal figures in Brittany and Britain, and the ove for the colossal still found over the whole of that part of France lying between Marseilles and Brittany, the old route of tin traffic between Britain and the Medi- terranean. Still existing Phoenician customs were referred to on the same route, and then references were made to some discoveries on this route, and in the south of Britain and the south of Ireland, which tended to.the conclusion that the articles discovered were introduced by Oriental, probably by Phoenician traders. One of these was a sculptured human head in the exact style of Assyrian art, as found at Nineveh, and which was discovered some slight distance under the surface on the estate of the Earl of Mount Edgcumbe, in Devonshire, who had drawn the attention of the author of the paper to it, and furnished him with a photograph. Anothev was a bronze mask or head found in a bog in the south of Ireland, near the Galtee mountains; it was the property of Lord James Butler, by whom the particulars and a photograph were furnished to Dr. Phené with a request that he would give his attention to the matter, and throw what light he was able on the subject; and to which, in response to such request, the author had devoted much time and research. This bronze represented the head of a cow, and had a close resemblance to the head found by Dr. Schliemann at Mycenz, which he identified as the head of Hera. The latter relic was minutely examined by Dr. Phené at Athens, every facility 584 REPORT—1878. being afforded him by the Greek Government. The Mycenz head was silver, with horns thickly plated with gold, and the head found in Ireland was a bronze one, with the horns (missing) made to take on and off, thereby clearly indicating that they were capable of being removed for security, and were therefore, no doubt, also golden. Both the heads had the sun disc on the forehead, but the bronze one, which he con- sidered was evidently of Phoenician workmanship, had also the emblem of Astarte or Ashtoreth, the Sidonian deity, on the forehead. In the mask found in Ireland, the tongue protruded, indicating sleep or rest, and this symbolism was further ex- emplified by the crescent moon being placed beneath the sun disc, and so indicative of her rest or sleep, a strong similitude when taken in connection with the well- known appeal to the priests of Baal, who must have represented their deities in action or occupation, “Cry aloud, for he is a god, either he is talking, or he is pur- suing, or sleepeth, and must be awaked.” Dr. Phené, who had gone carefully over the whole districts referred to in Asia Minor, Greece, the Levant, and the complete course in France, found a cow’s head sculptured in the island of Paros, and another on part of an ancient temple now forming the lintel of a Greek church near Amycle, not far from Sparta. Another object of great interest was represented, as were all the others, by a fine photograph representing a bronze figure of a deity, shown to be the Tyrian Hercules, found at Vienne, near Besancon, not far from the old route re- ferred to, through Gaul. This deity bore on its head an enormous crown composed of hammers, the number of which agrees with the united number of the Kabiri of Samothrace and the Cyclopes of Sicily, their occupation being the same, viz. that of metallurgists. Dr. Phené considers they represented the same personifications, but lost the attributes of divinity as their traditions were brought westward. The attitude of this deity and a vessel he holds in his right hand agree with the repre- sentation of one of the Kabiri on a coin of Pergamus. TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION D.—-DEPT. ANTHROPOLOGY. 585 TUESDAY, AUGUST 20, 1878. The following Papers were read :— 1. Les Races Anciennes deVIrlande. Utilité de Vétude des traditions qui les concernent pour V’ethnographie de V Europe prinutive. Par Henri Marri. Jai désiré présenter a cette savante association quelques observations sur un sujet qui me semble digne d’intérét et qui mériterait de plus amples développe- ments ; mais j’aurai atteint mon but si j’ai pu attirer l’attention de l’assistance sur la question qui me préoceupe: cette question, c’est la concordance que je crois trouver entre les résultats qu’obtiennent actuellement les recherches des anthropo- logistes et des ethnographes sur les vieilles populations du continent et les résultats que donne ]’étude des traditions historiques et légendaires de I’Irlande. Les anthropologistes signalent une race brune brachycéphale qui existe le long du Danube dans les régions ot ont dominé jadis les Gaulois blonds dolicocéphales ; on retrouve cette race brune en France, dans la Celtique de César (France centrale) et plus ou moins dans le reste de Ja France ; on la retrouyve aussi a des proportions diverses en Angleterre, Galles, Ecosse, Irlande. On la retrouve partout mélée aux Gaulois ou Celtes blonds ou chatains et aux yeux bleus. Ces hommes bruns étaient la race dominée: les grands Gaulois blonds de l’histoire grecque et romaine étaient la race dominante. Examinons maintenant ce que nous donnent les traditions irlandaises. LIrlande semble d’abord occupée par des sauvages qui n’ont pas de nom dans Vhistoire; puis arrivent successivement plusieurs essaims, plusieurs colonies de Celtes primitifs dont les établissements ne subsistent pas, mais dont le souvenir cependant persiste ; leurs conducteurs supposés sont évidemment des personnages mythologiques, de vieilles divinités qu’on a transformées beaucoup plus tard en personnages humains. Un de ces noms importe 4 signaler : le nom de Némedh, et parce que Némedh est l’ancétre supposé des colonies postérieures qui réussirent enfin a s’établir d’une maniére durable en Irlande, et parce que ce nom de Némedh se retrouve partout dans les traditions des peuples celtiques, depuis 1’Ivlande jusque dans la Gaule d’Asie (Galatie): il désigne tout ce qui est ancien, véné- rable, sacré: c’est le nom miéme des sanctuaires druidiques. A la race de Némedh, suivant la tradition, appartient donc le premier peuple qui ait laissé des traces subsistantes en Irlande, le peuple des Fir-Bolgs. On a voulu en faire des Belges, mais ils n’ont pas le moindre rapport avec les Belges de César, qui sont les plus récents, en Occident, des grands Gaulois blonds. Les Fir-Bolgs sont au contraire trés anciens, et ils sont une petite race brune. Comment alors la tradition en fait-elle une branche des descendants de Némedh, c’est-a-dire des Celtes ou Gaulois? C'est que, s'ils n’étaient pas de méme sang, ils étaient de méme langue et de mceurs analogues plus ou moins; ils étaient celtisés quand ils vinrent en Irlande ; les noms d’hommes et de lieux qui proviennent d’eux sont des noms celtiques comme ceux des premiéres colonies et comme ceux des autres immigrations postérieures. Cette observation relative aux Fir-Bolgs d’Irlande est également applicable aux Ligures de Gaule et d’Italie, ce peuple brun, mélé aux Celtes, qui, dans les oa historiques, ne parlait plus d’autre langue que la langue des Gaulois ou eltes, Parmi les usages celtiques qu’avaient les Fir-Bolgs, la tradition leur attribue celui d’élever des tumulus, des monuments mégalithiques, quoique les plus con- 586 REPORT—1878. sidérables de ces monuments ue leur soient point attribués. En Angleterre, de méme, on signale les restes brachycéphales trouvés dans les rouwnd-barrows qui paraissent se rapporter aux fréres des Fir-Bolgs d’Irlande. Au huitiéme siécle avant l’ére chrétienne, peu de temps aprés la venue des Fir- Bolgs, la tradition, suivant les Annales des Quatre Maitres, fait arriver un peuple nouveau : il s’appelait la race de la Déesse Dana ou des Dieux de Dana: ce sont de grands hommes blonds aux yeux bleus, des druides autrement organisés que les. druides bretons, avec une mythologie différente et qui parait antérieure. Ce peuple & organisation sacerdotale conquiert ]’Irlande sur les Fir-Bolgs et les assujétit. Un vieux poéme bardique sur la bataille de Moytura ot les Dananniens vainquirent les Fir- Bolgs, contient une particularité bien remarquable, que Lady Ferguson a signalée dans son excellent livre On the Ancient Irish before the Conquest. A 1l’6poque ou le poéme fut écrit, les Gaéls d’Inlande ne portaient depuis bien des siécles que des glaives de- fer: cependant les bardes se souvenaient si bien de l’Age du bronze, que l’auteur du poéme explique la différence qui existait entre l’armement des Dananniens et celui des Fir-Bolgs; ces derniers n’avaient que de mauvaises 6pées triangulaires, larges, courtes, mal fabriquées; les autres avaient des épées plus longues, mieux fabri- quées, mieux affilées, de forme élégante Or, vous pouvez vérifier au Museum de VTrish Royal Academy exactitude du poéte: ces deux sortes d’épées sont rangées- dans les vitrines 4 cdté les unes des autres. Vous avez 1a les armes dont se servaient les deux peuples rivaux il y a 2,500 ans. J’ai fait remarquer l’accord qui me paraissait exister entre les observations. anthropologiques et la tradition. Il y a aussi accord entre la tradition et les hilologues, les linguistes. La linguistique nous montre une grande famille de ancues, la famille aryenne, se formant dans 1’Asie centrale, et en conclut que nos aieux, ceux-lé du moins qui nous ont donné nos langues européennes, sont venus dé cette région. la tradition irlandaise ne remonte pas jusqu’a l’Asie centrale, mais elle est sur la route; elle fait venir les diverses colonies de la Thrace, de la Gréce,. cest-a-dire du Pont-Euxin et de l’Asie-Mineure, en résumé, de |’Orient. Peu importent les fables, et les infiltrations classiques, relativement modernes, qué altérent ici les vieux souvenirs celtiques; le fond, c’est la marche des immigrations d’Orient en Occident. Je ferai observer que la tradition welche ou cymryque de Galles est en accord avec la tradition irlandaise. Lhu Gadarn, ancienne divinité que les Triades transforment en conducteur de peuple, améne les Cymrys du pays de l’EKté (Bro haf), ou, dit la glose, est a présent Constantinople. Pour les Dananniens, les Tuatha-De-Danann, il y a quelque chose de particulier, et qui mérite grande attention. Ils ne viennent pas tout droit de l’Orient; ils viennent de Lochlin, c’est-a-dire de la Scandinavie. Tl y a des traditions qui les font venir 1,200, et jusqu’a 1,500 ans avant V’ére- chrétienne ; mais la plus accréditée, celle qu’ont choisie les Quatre Maitres, dans leurs grandes Annales d’Irlande, fixe leur avénement au huitiéme siécle seulement. Or, les études des savants du Nord nous fournissent ici un rapprochement trés frappant. Les savants Suédois et Danois font remonter approximativement & huit siécles environ avant V’ére chrétienne l’arrivée en Scandinavie d’un peuple qui succéde & celui qui élevait des monuments mégalithiques. Ce nouveau peuple construit des tumulus ot il n’y a plus de grottes de grandes pierres, mais des chambres funéraires en petits matériaux, ot l’on trouve les guerriers non incinérés, avec leurs grandes épées de bronze, plus longues, plus larges, plus lourdes que les 6pées irlandaises, et parfois avec les restes de leurs vétements. Ces conquérants sont, j’en suis convaincu, les Cimbres de l’histoire romaine, Celtes de race, et partis: du Pont-Euxin pour le Nord & la méme é6poque ow leurs fréres les Bretons en partaient pour l’Occident. L’archéologie ne signale dans la Scandinavie rien dintermédiaire entre ces hommes aux grandes épées de bronze et aux ornements dor, auxquels appartenaient aussi les grandes trompettes de bronze,—rien d’inter- médiaire, dis-je, entre les Cimbres et les Scandinaves, les cuerriers aux épées de fer et aux ornements Wargent, qui ne paraissent dans le Nord qu’au commencement de l’ére chrétienne. Un passage du grand géographe Strabon me parait se rapporter 4 la migration des Cimbres et des Bretons vers le Nord et l'Ouest. Strabon rappelle une tradition suivant laquelle une double émigration de Cimmériens et de Vénétes ou Hénétes: TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION D.—DEPT. ANTHROPOLOGY. 587 serait partie du Pont-Euxin 4 une époque postérieure 4 la rédaction de I'Iliade, mais antérieure 4 cette autre émigration cimmérienne donc parle Hérodote et que détermina l’invasion des Scythes six siécles avant notre ére. Cela nous donnerait encore 4 peu prés huit siécles avant notre ére, l'Iliade étant considérée comme datant d’environ neuf siécles avant Jésus-Christ. Les Vénétes sont restés celtisés et mélés aux Celtes en Italie, en Armorique, en Galles, en Ecosse. Voici comme ces migrations des Cimmériens ou Cimbres me paraissent nous. ramener aux Tuatha-De-Danann. Les Cimbres remplacent dans le Nord le euple des monuments mégalithiques. Or, la tradition irlandaise fait venir les Mons de Scandinavie & une époque qui se rapproche de la venue des Cimbres dans le Nord. N’est-il pas probable que la caste sacerdotale du Nord a émigré deyant les conquérants, avec une partie de la population, et qu'elle est arrivée en Irlande, ou la tradition lui attribue les plus imposants des monuments mégali- thiques, Newgrange et autres ? A propos des Cimbres, Pline cite quelques mots de leur langue, qui ont une- physionomie tout-a-fait bretonne, et Tacite nous dit que les Alstii (Mstoniens ?). parlent une langue trés voisine du breton. Pour me résumer sur les Dananniens, ils sont, 4 mes yeux, une branche des. premiéres migrations celtiques dont Némedh est le prototype. Ils auraient été les. constructeurs des monuments mégalithiques en Scandinavie, pendant que d’autres Celtes primitifs, leurs fréres, construisaient nos monuments de Gaule (Bretagne et autres), d’Albion, ete. Newgrange et les autres grands monuments dananniens. d'Irlande seraient donc postérieurs 4 Carnac, Locmariaker, etc., quoique appartenant 4 la méme tradition et & une branche analogue des Celtes. Les signes symboliques des monuments de Bretagne et ceux des monuments irlandais, sans étre absolument pareils, sont trés analogues; il n’y a que ce qu’on pourrait nommer une différence de dialectes. - Les Tuatha-De-Danann, vainqueurs des Fir-Bolgs, furent, a leur tour, deux siécles aprés, suivant la tradition, vaincus par de nouveaux conquérants, les Scotts ou Milésiens, clans héroiques, qui subjuguérent les tribussacerdotales. Les Milésiens,. eux, seraient venus du Sud-Ouest, comme les Dananniens, du Nord-Est. Is étaient partis de Espagne. Is étaient moins blonds, chatains ; ils semblent avoir été de- race plus ou moins mélangée: je les appellerais volontiers des Celtibéres. Je poserai seulement deux questions en ce qui les concerne: 1°. Avaient-ils déja les armes de fer quand ils arrivérent ? Les Gaulois du Danube, qui, aprés avoir envahi Vest de la Gaule, envahirent l’Italie, avaient déja les épées de fer lorsqw ils prirent Rome, prés de quatre siécles avant notre ére, et les Celtibéres, de leur coté, eurent de bonne heure des glaives de fer, et de meilleure trempe que ceux des Gaulois. 2°. Ce qu’on dit de la religion des Milésiens est singulier. Tribus héroiques, ils. devaient avoir des dieux héroiques ; on leur attribue cependant des dieux cosmogo- niques ; Crom, leur grand dieu, est un Chronos, un Saturne: son nom yeut dire courbe, la courbe génératrice du cercle qui se referme sur lui-méme: il est entouré de douze dieux inférieurs, comme une année mystique avec ses douze mois. Cela conviendrait bien mieux aux Dananniens qu’aux Milésiens. Serait-ce une partie de la mythologie danannienne dont Cormac ne nous parle pas dans son Gilossatre, lorsqwil cite la déesse Dana et la famille de dieux issue d’elle? Les Scotts. auraient-ils recu ce mythe des Dananniens ? Je terminerai, quant & ces vieux peuples, en émettant le voeu que l’on entre- prenne de fouiller Jes tumulus irlandais qui passent pour les plus anciens, ceux qui sont censés étre les tombeaux de Beath, d’Hire ou Ceasair, et autres personnages prétendus conducteurs des premiéres colonies. On n’y trouvera pas les restes de ces étres mythiques; mais on pourra y trouver des objets archaiques trés ihtéressants pour les études pré-historiques ou, pour mieux dire, pour les études. des origines de histoire. Permettez-moi d’ajouter une observation personnelle: j'ai visité une partie des comtés de Galway et de Mayo: je comptais y rencontrer en majorité les descendants des Fir-Bolgs: j’ai vu au contraire dominer dans cette contrée la race blonde aux yeux bleus, de beaucoup la plus nombreuse. 5 Dans la séance du vendredi 16, M. le major-général Lane Fox a lu un trés intéressant rapport sur le camp de César, & Folkestone, et sur le Mount Caburn, 588 REPORT— 1878. en Sussex. Les observations de son rapport peuvent s’appliquer a plusieurs des anciennes fortifications appelées en France camps de César, et qui sont d’anciens opptda celtiques occupés bien aprés César par les Romains; mais un plus grand nombre de ces oppida celtiques, en France, n’ont jamais été occupés par les Romains: je citerai le prétendu camp de César prés Dieppe, auquel une tradition sans doute mieux fondée donne le nom de cité de Lime et ow I’on trouve des objets de provenance celtique trés ancienne. J’émettais le voeu que Von fouillét les tumulus irlandais réputés les plus ’ anciens; la fouille pratiquée dans un des tumulus de Moytura a déja donné un résultat : ce tumulus passe pour le tombeau d’un des chefs des Fir-Bolgs. On yia trouvé une urne trés primitive, ot Jes ornements fort simples paraissent avoir été creusés avec l’ongle dans la terre avant la cuisson. Ceci se rapporte trés bien avec les traditions sur les Fir-Bolgs, qui passent pour beaucoup moins civilisés que leurs vainqueurs les Tuatha-De-Danann. A ceux-ci appartiendraient les urnes beaucoup plus finement ornées et de forme assez élégante, trouvées dans d’autres tumulus, et trés analogues par le style avec celles des monuments de France. Je remercie la savante assemblée d’avoir bien voulu m’entendre et serai trés satisfait si quelques-unes des personnes éclairées qui la composent prennent intérét aux questions que j'ai touchées et contribuent par leurs lumiéres 4 les résoudre. Une derniére observation me revient 4 propos de l’écriture Ogham. I] ne parait pas douteux qu’elle provienne des Tuatha-De-Danann. Sils ont habité la Scandinavie avant l’Irlande, ils n’y employaient pas encore l’Ogham, puisqu’on ne le trouve pas sur les monuments mégalithiques du Nord; c’est done depuis leur arrivée en Irlande qu'ils l’ont inventé, et l’on peut le qualifier spécialement de- caractére druidique irlandais. 2. On some objects of Ethnological Interest collected in India and its Islands. By V. Bat, M.A., F.G.S. Mr. Ball exhibited and described a number of objects which he had collected in some of the least-known and wildest parts of India, and in the Nicobar and Anda- man Islands. From the peninsular there were a series of stone implements, having a marked resemblance to certain well-known forms of wide distribution. There were also some peculiar adze-shaped implements, found in Western Bengal, which had served to confirm a previously expressed supposition* as to a prehistoric connection having existed between the Mundas of Bengal and the Muns of Burmah. Other objects shown were battle-axes and musical instruments used by the Khonds of Orissa ; fire-sticks from Sambalpur; and boomerangs from Katiawar. Nicobar Islands.—Photographs of the villages and people of these islands served to illustrate the peculiarity of the structure of the houses and the costume of the people, which latter was further exemplified by some wooden figures, which the author considered were rather to be regarded as effigies of the departed than as idols. The tail-like strips of cloth which hang from the waist and trail on the ground were probably the cause of the ancient belief in the existence of tailed men on some of the islands inthe Bay of Bengal. In one of the editions of Ptolomy’s map, islands which were not improbably intended to represent the Nicobars are labelled “ Satyrorum insule tres quarum incole caudas ut sunt satyrorum habere -dicentur.” Other objects from the same islands were a specimen of picture-writing ; -ear-cylinders ; cocoa-nut-shell water-vessels ; a copper-headed hog-spear, and a large ‘sheet of cloth made of the beaten bark of a species of Celtis. ‘The author gave ‘his reasons for believing in the existence of a Negrito race similar to the Andamanese in the interior of the Nicobars. Andaman Islands.—The objects from these islands which were exhibited and ‘described were, human skulls adorned with shells, and which had been carried by the relatives of the deceased slung on their shoulders; glass bottle flakes, used for ‘shaving ; necklaces of turtle bones; a cooking vessel of sun-dried clay in a bamboo frame; bows and arrows of peculiar shapes; bones of turtle and Dugong from a * By General Sir Arthur Phayre. Ti tts ee TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION D.—DEPT. ANTHROPOLOGY. 589 trophy ; and oysters from a kitchen midden, the latter being remarkable from the fact that the Andamans of the present day do not, it is said, eat oysters, though they do eat other shell-fish. In conclusion the author remarked that ingenious in construction as some of the objects were, their invention probably dated back to a long distant time, since, in his experience, no savages of the present day ever invented a new implement or changed the manner of performing any single custom of their lives. 3. Notes on the Tribes of Midian. By Carrain R. F. Burton. Sée Section EH, p. 630. 4, Notes on some Tribes of Tropical Aborigines. By T. J. Hurcurnson, late Her Majesty’s Consul at Callao. The memoir commenced by the author's statement of the tribes he was about to. speak of being some of those in the tropical regions of West Africa and South America, with whom he had become acquainted during his twenty-three years of going to and fro in climes beyond the seas. Its chief object was to tell peculiarities of these tribes—to show the analogies in superstitions and social barbarities, as well as in a sort of indigenous civilization, amongst peoples of different races, dwelling on different sides of the globe. The Aborigines of Tropical Africa were. first introduced under the different heads of—l. Pagan Superstitions. 2. Domestic Slavery. 38. Polygamy. 4. Cannibalism. 5. Social Barbarities. 6. Idioms or Languages. A description was given of the peculiar ideas in parts of Western Africa about the first Creation of Man. From this the author went on to the Tropical African system of polytheism—Serpent worship in Fernando Po was described as existing in the fact of the skin of a large kind of boa constrictor, called the “ Roukaronkon” being annually suspended from a tree in the “Reossa” (or large forum space for palavers), and all the children born within the previous year being carried out by their mothers, and their little hands held up to touch the tail of the serpent. The people of the Egbo or ‘ tiger’ tribe have an idea of an Almighty power, whom they entitle “ Abasi Ibum.” But as he is believed to be the Creator of all things incom- prehensible, they worship a subordinate god-head whom they entitle Idem-Efik. Their superstition of making what they entitle “ devil houses” in obsequies for the dead, wherein are put furniture, drink, eatables, and cloth, were shown to be pre- cisely the same as exist amongst the Mongolian tribes in the Feejee Islands, as described by Dr. Leeman. This people (the Efiks) at Old Calabar, likewise ad-. minister “ Afias,” or Ordeals, pretendedly to detect crime, but in reality to keep the slaye class in subjugation. They have also a biennial custom of purifying their towns from evil spirits. Domestic slavery was described in Western Tropical Africa, where all the women, from the wives of Kings and Chiefs downwards, were described as slaves. There isa custom on the Gold Coast to buy or appropriate out of the ménage of domestic slavery a boy or girl, and bestow on him or her the title of Crabbah or “Oerah.” This signifies that they are to be looked on as the soul or spirit of master or mistress. _ They are treated well, never asked to work, wear chains of gold round their necks, with a medallion of gold, and when their owners die they are killed to accompany them into the next world. The two social institutions of Polygamy and Cannibalism were touched on briefly—An analogy was pointed out between the practice which existed amongst the Moxos, a tribe of South Americans now extinct, and the people of Old Calabar, when the author was out there twenty- five years ago, of the barbarous practice of killing twins. The paper touched on the tribes of South American Indians—the Tobas, Guaicaruses, Abipons, and Mocoyvis —seen by the author in the tropical parts of the Gran Chaco, which he traversed in 1863. The Chimoo people of Peru were also spoken of. Differences of idioms be- tween the tropical Africans living almost in contiguous districts were related, and the same shown to exist in Bolivia (within the tropics also), where in one province thirty-seven different tribes of Indians existed in former times, each tribe haying a different idiom, and many of them having such a limited knowledge of arithmetic as to be able to count only to five, and some to three, -590 REPORT—1878. -5. On the Prehistoric Relations of the Babylonian, Egyptian, and Chinese Characters and Oulture. By Hypr Cuarke, V.P.A.S., V.P.S.S. Referring to the relationship of these three groups of characters, the writer gaye illustrations of a community of meaning and form, and of a diversity of sound, This indicated that the original words attached to the characters belonged to some earlier language different from these, and in which the sounds having identical meanings corresponded. Taking the cuneiform characters for Ka and Ba they were in opposition (equivalent to HK). Together they formed the word Kaba, a well-known recognisable prehistoric negative used for Not, Death, &e. In Chinese the roots 7 and 75 for No and Not indicate a com- bination of the same characters (HK). In the ancient Shwo wen there are three arms on each side, so that the original form may be indicative of two hands in opposition. Further, while in later times Kappa is K, in square Hebrew Caph is nearer to C, and Caph means the Hollow of the Hand and is female, and in oppo- sition to its neighbouring letter Yod, which signifies the Hand or emblem of the man or male. On the other side Akkad 42 of Lenormant, sounding Ka and ga is a square character (originally converted from round QO), and signifying Mouth, Speak. The square Chinese character 30 signifies Mouth, Speak, and sounds K’eu and ga(p). No. 156 Akkad square signifies Presence ( = Face) and enclosure (=Field). The Chinese character for Face 109, and for Garden 102, correspond to Akkad. No. 204 Akkad signifies both House and Speak, conjunctions of meaning for the same sound to be found in the African or prehistoric languages. No. 71 Akkad stands for Fish, Ship, equivalents for which are found in Africa. No. 459 Aldkad (|| or =) stands for Son, Water, River, also combined as one word in Africa. No, 354 Akkad signifies Tongue and Serpent, again combined in Africa, In Chinese square characters, converted from round (Q) for O), are used for equivalents prehistorically, and psychologically and philologically connected, -as Round, Circle, Eye, to See, Sun, Moon, Face, Head, Ear, Mouth, to Say, Sound, Mother. The favourite sound in Chinese for this group is M, (as in English Mouth, Moon, Mother). This series is continued in the alphabets, the Pheenician, Sabean, Safa, and some of the features may be recognised in modern Roman as O. Indeed, in the alphabets many emblems of the ancient Nature- worship, or emblems may be recognised as I, y,C,U,0,V,0,S,T, A? M,®,K. With regard to the comparative philology of Akkad, Mr. Clarke continued to resist the Ugrian classification of M. Ujfalvy, and showed that the roots in Akkad and in Ugrian can be identified with those of the languages of prehistoric character of the Old and New World, but remarkably in Houssa, Mandingo, Pulo, Timbuktu, Aku, of Africa. Thus they approach in their affinities the Kolarian group of India as much as the Ugrian, and must precede the Dravidian or Tamil. This afforded independent evidence, in contradiction of the Semitic theory of M. Halevy, that the transliteration assigned to Akkad words by. Lenormant is correct. At the same time we must allow for an earlier epoch of culture in characters and in mythology, antecedent to that of the Babylonians, Egyptians, and Chinese, and cor- responding to that of the moundbuilders. With regard to the Egyptian mythology Mr. Clarke gave illustrations of the prehistoric origin of Pasht (the moon) Seb [Shepi], (Siva), and Kaba, He again maintained with regard to and “A that in cuneiform, the yowel A, is male, and A, the vowel U and O, is female. 6. On the Spread of the Sclavs. By H. H. Howorrn. TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION D.—DEPT. ANTHROPOLOGY. 591 WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 21, 1878. The following Papers were read :— 1. On Flint Implements in Eqypt and in Midian. By Cartain R. F. Bourron. See Section H, p. 630. 2. Notices of an Expiring Race on the Bhutan Frontier. By T. Durant Beieuton. 3. Report of Excavation of a Bone Cave near Tenby, S. Wales. See Reports, p. 209. 4. Inscribed Bone Implements. By J. Park Harrison, M.A. At the meeting of the British Association at Plymouth last year, I exhibited some marks upon chalk, from the entrances of subterraneous galleries, at Cissbury, near Worthing, made by neolithic flint-workers for the purpose of obtaining materials for tools and weapons. They were of two kinds :— 1, Symbols, such as are often seen on ancient coins. filed Sele did yee oe 2, Simpler signs, and straight lines in different combinations, iy J i Wl Oe Bel A a IS Both descriptions of marks have been pronounced by eminent paleographists to be Runes, or adaptations of early characters by a semi-barbarous people. No sufficient evidence, however, existed that the marks at Cissbury were con- temporaneous with the galleries until March last, when the discovery of a skeleton buried with British rites, and with flint implements only associated with it, some ten feet higher than the entrance of a gallery, over which there were signs of a similar description to some in the second category (believed to be the earliest), removed all doubt respecting their antiquity. Search has since been made for runes of early date in France, which has re- sulted in the acquisition of evidence of an inductive kind that brief inscriptions, possibly only charms, but perhaps names and dedications, were in use in very early times in Western Europe. Some twenty examples (all on implements of horn or bone) have been found in various museums, and the collections so opportunely brought together this summer at the Paris Exhibition. There are also rune-like incisions on a bone which bears the remarkable outline of a horse, from the upper strata of the Victoria cave at Settle,* which are very similar to marks in the second category at Cissbury.t And it should be mentioned, * «Journ. Anthrop. Inst.’ vol. viii. p. 182. + I have also very recently heard that Runes have been found on a bone needle co. Kilkenny. 5) 592 REPORT—1878. that the marks on the butts of two lance-points, of which graphic representations. are given in the ‘ Reliquize Aquitanice,’ are considered by the accomplished editor (Professor Rupert Jones) to be inscriptive. It is not supposed that any of the early races, either in France or England, invented written characters. All that it is necessary to assume is that a know- ledge of letters may have been acquired by commerce or “contact” from a people in a higher state of civilisation, just as bronze was introduced into neo-lithic France from the East at what appears to have been a less remote period. In support of this I may mention that Professor Rhys, from a critical study of the Ogham characters, arrived some time back at the conclusion that they must have been founded on an earlier alphabet, which he considers would ultimately have been derived from the East.* Owing, however, to the perishable nature of the material (viz. wood) on which the earlier Runes are traditionally supposed to have been inscribed, no remains were believed to be in existence. It is important, so far as the more distinctive forms at Cissbury are concerned, that the significant fact should be known that coins have been found on the coast of Sussex, which Mr. Ernest Willett informs us are of the type of those of Sex, a Carthaginian colony in the South of Spain: + and some of the Runes of that district are like the symbols at Cissbury last alluded to. 5. The Primitive Human Family. By C. StAnttanp Waxes, M.A.I. After an examination of the theories of Mr. MacLennan, Sir John Lubbock, Mr. Morgan, and Mr. Herbert Spencer, all of which assumed that, owing to the un- certainty of paternity, the primitive human family was based on kinship through the female only, it was shown that such an assumption is not consistent with the social phenomena exhibited among uncultured peoples, which require the full recog- nition of relationship through the male as well as through the female, and that, while the clan or gentile organization is based on the latter, the primitive authority of the father as the head of the family is perpetuated in the tribal organization. * See ‘ Lectures on Welsh ¢ hilology.’ Triibner, p. 366. + ‘Numismatic Chron.,’ 1878, vol. xvii. New Series.” TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION D.—DEPT. ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 593 DEPARTMENT OF ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY. CHAIRMAN OF THE DEPARTMENT —R. McDONNELL, Esq., M.D., F.R.S. THURSDAY, AUGUST 15, 1878. The Department did not meet, FRIDAY, AUGUST 16, 1878, Dr. McDonnEtt gave the following Address :— Srxcz this Association met twelve months ago, the science of physiology has suf- fered an irreparable loss. In February last, Claude Bernard died, in the sixty-fifth year of his age. He was interred with a degree of pomp never in this country, and rarely even in France, accorded to men of science. His country showed how highly and how justly they estimated the merit of a man who—gentle, unobtrusive, modest—by the greatness of his genius and the brilliancy of his many discoveries, shed a lustre on the land which gave him birth. It was my privilege to have been at one time a pupil of this illustrious physio- logist. It will be my pride if I can show to a thoughtful and cultivated audience, such as I have the honour to address, that the discoveries of my honoured master, although of necessity made by experiment on animals, have added much to that stock of knowledge which has conferred the greatest benefits upon mankind, In an address like this, limited to a short time, it would not be possible to give a detailed account of the work accomplished by Bernard. To.do so would be to give a history of the progress of physiology for the last five-and-thirty years. His researches were so extensive and some of his discoveries so vast, that, by com- parison, they seemed to make others appear small, as the gigantic Californian pine seems to dwarf a goodly-sized oak which grows alongside it, Hence we speak of Bernard’s less important researches—of his minor discoveries, although of sufficient magnitude to haye seemed great if made by another. Of these I cannot speak at length. Yet some of my hearers well know that the services which Bernard has rendered to science by his researches on the pneumogastric nerves, the fifth pair, the chorda tympani, the facial, etc., are not small. Assuredly, the same may be said for his observations on “recurrent sensibility ;” on the blood pressure and the gases of the blood; on the variations of colour in this fluid according to the active or passive condition of the functions of the organ traversed by it; on the variations of temperature during these conditions of functional activity or inactivity; on the elective elimination by the glands of substances introduced into the economy, or of those which, as morbid products, accumulate in the system as the result of certain morbid states; on the special character of the action of the varieties of the salivary secretions ; upon the influence of the nervous centres on the secretion of saliva; on the electric phenomena manifested in nerve and muscle; on albuminuria connected _ with lesions of the nervous system; and (notably in its important practical bear- ings on uremia) on the modifications of the secretions of the stomach and intes- tines after arrest of the elimination of urea through the natural channels, 1878. QQ 594 REPORT—1878. Claude Bernard, in truth, left his mark deeply on every aspect of physiology on which he touched. His discoveries, however, as regards the functions of the pan- creas, of the liver, and concerning the vasomotor system of nerves, are those on which his fame will ever chiefly rest. It is not too much to say, that, prior to the communications made by Bernard to the Société de Biologie, little or nothing definite was known of the normal action of the pancreatic fluid. Even a popular audience can form a judgment as to the practical value of Bernard’s researches in this direction. Before the pub- lication of his memoir the fluid secreted by the pancreas was regarded as something destined: to dilute the bile and render it less acrid—its true action as a liquid taking a special and active part in.the digestion of particular kinds of food was, we may say, unknown. Bernard was the first physiologist who obtained pure, healthy pancreatic fluid from a living animal. It was he who showed its reaction. He demonstrated its extraordinary digestive power, not only over fats, but over other alimentary matters. He proved it to be the only one of the digestive liquids which at once forms a complete and permanent emulsion with fats. It is true Dr. Richard Bright had before (in 1832) observed fatty diarrhcea as existing in cases of organic disease of the pancreas, but, in fact, his observations were barren, and did not serve to direct attention to the action of the pancreatic fluid in digestion until after Bernard’s discoveries threw additional light on the question. Bernard’s researches on this subject have been so thorough and complete that he has left little to be learned. Yet there are many excellent physicians, who in their daily practice profit by his discoveries, who know little of the steps by which these dis- coveries were made, ‘They prescribe pepsine and pancreatine in one form or another, but oftentimes they know as little of the discoverers of these agents as the cheesemonger does about the secretion or coagulation of the milk from which the cheese is made which he sells over his counter. It is hardly honest in such per- sons to form and express a dogmatic opinion upon what experimental physiology has done for practice without conscientiously endeavouring to inform themselves on this subject. As regards the work accomplished by the liver in the animal economy, Bernard did nearly as much as he did for the pancreas. As every one knows, the liver is a large organ; it performs duties the importance of which to the health and happi- ness of mankind can hardly be overrated. Yet up to the year 1857 medical men were in absolute ignorance of one half of what the liver does. ‘They knew that it secreted bile; it was reserved for Bernard to discover another and no less impor- tant function hitherto unknown. The majority of those engaged in practice even still, I believe, look upon the liver as if the principal duty of this gland were nothing else than the secretion of bile. It is certain, however, that it does other work, little, if at all, inferior in importance to the formation of biliary matters, and quite as necessary to the maintenance of health. Its power of making and storing up for a time within its cells, a material resembling starch, constitutes, without doubt, one of its most important functions. This no person will for a moment doubt who takes the trouble of ascertaining by experiment the immense increase or diminution in bulk which the liver may be made to undergo in the space of a few days by such changes of diet as increase or diminish the amount of this starch- like material in its tissue. It was in March 1857, that Bernard announced the important discovery of a . material formed by the liver closely resembling starch or rather dextrine of vege- table origin, and, like it, readily changing into sugar in the presence of ferments. Some of those present are aware that I have ventured to differ from my illustrious teacher as to the ultimate destination of this substance in the animal economy. I prefer, therefore, to designate it by another name than that which he gave to it. He called it sugar-forming substance (glycogenic substance or glycogene). This name involves the supposition that it is destined for the formation of sugar. It is not quite fair in science to give names which point directly to one’s own theory- As some of those who, like Dr. Pavy and myself, have investigated this subject with a good deal of care, have still reason to doubt the sugar-forming theory as regards this substance, we naturally prefer a name which does not involve this supposition, We wish it to be called animal starch or dextrine (amyloid substance TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION D.—DEPT. ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 595 or zoo-amyline). But, call it by what name we may, its discovery stands forth as a great fundamental fact. It would be difficult to imagine a discovery more ex- tended in its applications. In the course of his investigations on this subject, Bernard showed the influence of diet, of digestion, of inanition upon this function of the liver. He showed the influence of the nerves and nervous centres in rela~ tion to it. He made the important discovery of the production of diabetes artifi- cially. He was led to discover a similar function as regards the formation of amyloid substance on the placenta. He built up an entirely new theory of diabetes, fundamentally changing the view hitherto held on this subject, and, in short, made the whole field his own. It is obvious to every one who allows himself calmly to reflect for a moment, that no physician can be a good practitioner who does not know something of the work done and the duties performed by the heart, or the stomach, or the lungs, etc., in a healthy state. Diseases are deviations from health ; to understand the one it is necessary to know something of the other. It must appear quite puerile, therefore, to any thinking person, the assertion that the discovery of an important new function in a great organ like the liver did not modify the practice of medicine and throw new light on disease, not of the liver alone, but throughout the whole frame. You will pardon me, therefore, if I again express my doubts of the intelli- gence or the honesty of those practitioners who treat contemptuously experimental physiology and such work as has been achieved by men like Claude Bernard, Faust, in his great soliloquy, addressing the Sublime Spirit of good, says :— “Thou didst not grant to me merely the cold gaze of open-mouthed astonishment. ° ‘Thou permittedst me to see into the depths of Nature as into the bosom of a friend.” It has been the lot, no doubt, of a few among those whom I address, to have exhibited to some of their friends the circulation of the blood, as seen through the _ Microscope, in the web of the frog’s foot. They will have been struck, no doubt, as I have heen, by the effect which this spectacle, when witnessed for the first time, has on different observers. Some look upon it much as they would upon a clever conjuring trick. It is to them no more than a transformation scene on the stage is toachild. “ How fast it goes,” they say. They are astonished that anything of the kind should go on in a frog. The cold unintelligent gaze of open-mouthed wonderment is, perhaps, even too strong an expression for any emotion which stirs them. Others there are who are struck dumb by the sight before them. One sees at once that they have caught a glimpse of a boundless ptospect—that they feel it has been granted to them to see more deeply into the bosom of Nature than they have ever done before. One perceives, to use again Goethe's words, that the Sublime Spirit has not turned to them his countenance in vain. There is an anecdote which I have dreamed of—as true, perhaps, as many such _ anecdotes are, yet full of beauty—that when Malpighi first showed to the Pope, whose friend and physician he was, this marvellous sight, his Holiness, having con- templated it for some moments in silence, raised his hands and eyes to heaven, repeating the “Te Deum,” then, kneeling, thanked God for having permitted .him to live to see so impressive a sicht. “Is it indeed true,” he asked, “ that this won- drous movement goes on within me and you and all men?” Being told that doubtless it was so, “Mirantur aliqui,” he ‘said, using the words of St. Augustin, “ altitudines montium, ingentes fluctus maris, altissimos lapsus fluminum et gyros siderum :—relinquunt seipsos nec mirantur!” Apparently, Pope Innocent XI. viewed with less jealousy dnd suspicion than many ecclesiastics are wont to do, those divine writings traced on the face of Nature (too little studied by the theo- logian), the interpretation and decipherment of which is the province and the plea- sure of the man of science. T have been led to this reflection, as it appears to me to explain the difference between various individuals when contemplating some new disclosure in natural science ; it illustrates the fashion in which the discovery to which I next allude is viewed by different classes of minds. A small filament of nerve, no thicker than a tiny silken thread, is divided in a rabbit's neck. Immediately a change is observed in the pupil of the eye on the same side. The ear on that side is felt to be obviously hotter than the other; the blood-vessels on that side of the head throb and contain QQ2 596 REPORT—1878. more blood. This same small filament of nerve is galvanized, and the reversal of the abcve phenomena is found to take place. To some this observation is not only - a mere meaningless juggler’s trick, but a cruel one. To others it is a key which opens a chamber full of treasures. It is like a newly-discovered isthmus or bridge uniting two vast continents—that of the circulatory system with that of the ner- yous system. In this controlling power of the nerves over the calibre of the blood vessels lies the explanation of many of the most interesting phenomena which go on within us. The burning flush of shame, the cheek blanched with fear, the sudden activity of glandular secretion, as when an emotion of the mind causes tears to flow, or salt placed on the tongue causes the secretion of saliva. The activity of the brain in our waking moments, its death-like inactivity during sleep, the regula- tion of our temperature, ete., are, within the limits of health, phenomena connected with this controlling power of the sympathetic nervous system. Within the- domain of disease, its applications are without end or number; from the sympa- thetic and often painful swelling of the milk glands (hardly to be regarded as a morbid action) to the condition of the blood-vessels of the brain which causes the dreaded convulsive seizure of epilepsy, this dominion of the sympathetic nervous system over the blood-vessels has a meaning and a practical importance. It would be unjust to others to say that Claude Bernard was the sole discoverer: of this vasomotor nervous system, as it is called. It would be equally unjust to his memory not to admit that his researches had a large share in this discovery. Pourfour du Petit and Dupuy had no doubt, long since divided the cord of the great sympathetic nerve in.the neck, and noticed some of its consequences. But the real discovery of the vasomotor neryous system was reserved for our time. The illustrious physiologist (Dr. Brown-Séquard) who now fills the chair in the Collége de France, rendered famous by such predecessors as Bernard, Magendie, and Laennec, has no small share in this discovery, and, as regards its application to the explanation of the phenomena of disease, and its treatment, has accom- plished more than any of his predecessors. We owe to Bernard the discovery of the principal results due to division of the cervical portion of the sympathetic nerve ; assuredly the discovery is one in which experimental physiology has reason to triumph, for it must be regarded as one of the most valuable disclosures of modern science. It cements together the vast number of isolated facts which, since the days of Prochaska and Robert Whytt, have been accumulating upon the hands of physiologists, but which, in the length and breadth of their importance, even Marshall Hall himself did not appreciate. But let us turn to the other half of this experiment; let me remind you that Dr. Brown-Séquard in America, Pro- fessor Claude Bernard in Paris, and Dr. Augustus Waller in England, almost simultaneously observed that galvanization of the divided sympathetic is followed by a reversal of all the phenomena which haye been already noticed to follow its divyision—the vessels contract, heat diminishes, secretion is checked. These experi- ments are illustrative of the influence of the nervous system over the vascular. They have formed the basis of physiological theories very widely differing from each other, and perhaps less striking but not less valuable experiments bearing on the same subject. The muscular tunic of the vessels which ramify through the body places them under the control of the nervous system as completely as is the heart itself. As the muscular structure of the heart, so the muscular structure of the vessels is subject to emotional and reflex influences. It is not only the blood-vessels of the cheeks which blush. The greater development of the muscular tunic in the vessels of glands and of the brain, shows that in those situations the arrangements for controlling the blood supply are even more complete than else- where. It is true that it has long been known that intimate relations exist between organs more or less remote from each other. The term sympathy has long been in use, and equally applied to the healthy functional activity as to the pathological disturbances of organs distinct from each other. In the eyes of the practitioner, the morbid sympathies (or reflex disturbances), such as occur in teething children, or, later in life, from irritation of the gastro-intestinal or genito-urmary systems, etc., have naturally eclipsed in interest the normal physiological sympathies, such as that between the uterus and mammary gland, the mucous membrane of the tongue and the salivary glands, etc. But be it remembered that they are closely TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION D.—DEPT. ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 597° kindred phenomena, similar in mechanism, and, in fact, often passing into each other so gradually that it is impossible to say where the normal terminates and the morbid begins. It is hardly possible to conceive any kind of research which bears more closely than these upon the various maladies that flesh is heir to. Some hard-hearted individuals, however, in these countries, confounding their own selfish feelings with true humanity, who, I would venture to say, have rarely spent days or nights of their lives watching at the bedside of real suffering, «“ Who live In mere mock knowledge of their fellow’s woe, Thinking their smiles may heal it,” who fancy themselves too humane to seek a remedy for human agony in an experi- ment which it would be painful to themselves to conduct—such persons have heaped much obloquy on the name of Bernard. Let me pass by these in silence. There are others who, admitting the greatness of his achievements and his power of kindling an enthusiasm for research among his pupils, think that these same results might have been attained by a less amount of repetition of experiment. Them I would truly respect. Most earnestly would I urge those physiologists who, either as original inquirers or as teachers, may follow in the footsteps of Claude Bernard, while they admire him as a sincere, zealous, patient searcher after truth, to imitate him in that, and avoid what they believe to have been his errors. Bernard’s discoveries, in truth, tell but a small part of the tale of all that he accomplished during his lifetime. He was one of thoge truly great teachers who exercise a great and expanding influence over the minds of their pupils. He pos- sessed a gentle, mild, and thoroughly infectious enthusiasm. A conscientious worker, a sincere lover of truth, a marvellously dexterous experimenter, he possessed the power of expressing himself with great precision and great simplicity. His pupils in every part of the civilized world will indeed account him as one “Of those immortal dead who live again In minds made better by their presence: live In pulses stirred to generosity, In deeds of daring rectitude, in scorn For miserable aims that end with self, In thoughts sublime that pierce the night like stars, And, with their mild persistence, urge man’s search To vaster issues.’’ The following Papers were read :— 1. Observations on some Points in the Osteology of an Infantile Gorilla Skeleton. By Auten Tuomson, M.D., LL.D., F.R.S. Dr. Allen Thomson exhibited the skeleton of an infantile female Gorilla, which he had prepared from a specimen sent him some time ago, and which is now placed in the Hunterian Museum of Glasgow University. The first dentition had been recently completed, and the age of the animal was estimated to be from eighteen months to two years. It had been shot through the head and had sustained a fracture of the thigh, but had lived long enough after the injuries to allow a healing process to be set up round the two apertures by which the lead pellet had passed through the opposite parietal bones of the cranium, and the fractured femur to be reunited by bone. The author reserved for another opportunity the fuller account of the state of ossification of the bones of the skeleton, and limited his remarks for the present to several points in the osteology of the skull, vertebral column, ribs, and sternum. In instituting a comparison between the skull of the infantile gorilla and that of the adult or of other animals, the author pointed out the importance of adopting a reliable standard position in which the skulls submitted to observation should be placed so as to secure uniform results; and, following Professor Flower, gave the preference to that recommended by Broca, in which the horizontal plane of “the skull is made to coincide with that of the visual or orbital axes; and he showed, 598 REPORT—1 878. by reference to drawings of the young and adult gorilla skulls, and those of other animals and of man, the necessity and advantages of such a standard in enabling the observer to make accurate corresponding representations and measurements of di- mensions and directions, The resemblance of the view taken in the norma facialis: of the infantile gorilla to the human skull was very striking. In its general form this skull, as belonging to the infantile age, like that of its congeners and of man, differs remarkably from that of the adult; and in the case of the gorilla and orang, more particularly of the male, in the proportionally large size of the cranial part, the smaller size of the face, jaws and teeth, and in the entire absence of the crests of bone which attain such an enormous size in the adult male gorilla. In the infantile condition there is probably little or no difference in the form of the skull in the two sexes ; but as age advances, and more especially as the second dentition appears, the distinctions arise by the greater development of the jaws and by the gradual approach and elevation of the temporal ridges, which remain distinct in the female, but rise into the sagittal and occipital crests of the male. In the skull shown there was as yet no appearance of the temporal lines, except in the commencement at the zygomatic process of the frontal bone. The double ridges on each side described by recent authors come to be obvious only at the change of the dentition. For comparison with the human form the skull of a child of about two and @ half years of age with the first dentition recently completed was employed, and many points of jinterest were brought out. Among these the capacity of the cra- nium may be mentioned. “That of the child’s skull now referred to was 64 cubic inches, that of the infantile gorilla 233, while the average adult human skull may be stated at 85 cubic inches, and that of the adult male gorilla at 33, and of the female at 28 cubic inches. : The author then referred more particularly to a point in the osteology of the: skull which had excited considerable interest since the researches of Virchow and Gruber had thrown some light upon it, viz. the mode of union of the several bones which meet at the antero-lateral fontanelle of the foetal skull, or the ptereon of Broca. It is now known that considerable differences in this respect occur in the human skulls of the same and different races of men, and it has long been known (Owen) that among the anthropoid apes there are differences of a similar kind, and that these differences are in some instances at least connected with the existence of a separate bone in the seat of the place of meeting at the ptereon, of the frontal, parietal, squamous, and alisphenoid bones, to which the name of epipteric has been given by Professor Flower. In the great majority of human skulls, as well known to anatomists, the anterior: inferior angle of the parietal bone joins here the alisphenoid in a greater or less ex- tent,* and thus excludes the frontal and squamous bones from mutual union ; while in a smaller number of instances the alisphenoid and parietal are separated by the junction of the squamous and frontal bones. Now, in the gorilla, as shown in the skull exhibited, and in nine other skulls of the same animal examined by the author, the mode of union at the ptereon is in- variably squamo-frontal. In the chimpanzee he found the same kind of union to: prevail as in the gorilla in 23 out of 27 skulls examined ; but in two examples the uaion was spheno-parietal on both sides, and in two others it was squamo-frontal on one side and spheno-parietal on the other. In the orang, again, a greater difference was observed, for out of 30 skulls observed, the spheno-parietal union was present on both sides in 16, and the squamo-- frontal in 7, while in 4 the mode of union was different on the two sides, and in 8 there existed the intervening epipterie bones, occupying as it were the common territory. Tn 9 skulls of the Gibbon examined, 8 presented the spheno-parietal mode of union, and in the other case there was unilateral squamo-frontal union with an epipteric bone on the opposite side. * The author referred here to the differences observed in the human skull, but as he is engaged in unfinished observations on this subject, he reserves their de~ scription for another opportunity TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION D.—DEPT. ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 599 The author had made a considerable number of observations in different genera of Simiz and Prosimie, from which it appeared that in the whole of the American monkeys examined without exception, amounting to 40 specimens from the genera Mycetes, Ateles, Cebus, Pithecia, Nyctipithecus, Callithrix, and Hapale, the union at the ptereon was spheno-parietal ; and the same was found to be the case in the 18 apis observed of Lemur, Galago, Loris, and Cheiromys. In 96 skulls observed belonging tomonkeysof theOld World, considerable variety was found. In 23 of Macacus, 1 Colobus, and8 Cercocebus, all had squamo-frontal union ; of 33 baboons, the same kind of union existed in 29, in 1 double and in 1 unilateral spheno-parietal union was observed, and in 3 cases epipteric bones were present. In 10 skulls of Semnopithecus observed, 9 had spheno-parietal and one squamo-frontal union ; and in 20 skulls of Cercopithecus there was spheno-parietal union in 10 and squamo-frontal in 7 on both sides, and unilateral union of the two different kindsin 3. The author left for future consideration the causes determining these varieties, more especially as connected with the origin and mode of ossification of the epipteric bone ; but he showed the probability of a number of the varieties being attributable to the existence of such an intermediate bone at an early period, and te its union with one or other of the bones surrounding the ptereon. This union might be with alisphenoid, parietal, or squamous, but very rarely with the frontal bone. The author considers it doubtful that the epipteric is homologous with the posterior frontal, first described by Serres, afterwards by Rambaut and Renault, and more recently by Von Ihering (1872), but believed that the further explanation of the differences shown to exist in the mode of union of the bones at the ptereon is to be sought for with success in the history of their development, upon which he expected some light to be thrown by observations in which he was engaged. Dr. Thomson also directed the attention of the section to some peculiarities in the mode of ossification of the bones of the trunk in the young gorilla, which he connected with the very frequent varieties observed in the adult condition of these and other anthropoid apes. These observations referred—Ilst, to the condition of the sternum as regards the relative size of the presternum and mesosternum, and the number and place of im- plantation of the costal cartilages into the sternum; 2nd, tothe number of vertebral ribs, and the occasional development of additional ribs upon the lumbar vertebre ; and 3rd, to the variations in the relative number and state of development of the lumbar, sacral, and coccygeal vertebre in the four genera of anthropoid apes. The author reserved to another occasion the fuller description of thesé observa- tions, which were still incomplete. 2. The Intrinsic Muscles of the Mammalian Foot. By D. J. Cunnincuam, M.D., F.R.S.E., Sexior Demonstrator of Anatomy, University of Edin- burgh. The typical arrangement of the intrinsic muscles of the pes is the same as in the manus, and this arrangement is seen to best advantage in the feet of certain of the marsupialia. In these animals the muscles are laid down in three layers, viz. :— (1) A plantar layer of adductors. (2) A dorsal layer of abductors. (3) An intermediate layer of flexores breves. According to this disposition each digit is furnished with three muscles—one from each layer. Deviations from the typical arrangement may take place by suppression or fusion of certain of the elements of the different layers. Fusion of the constituents of the intermediate and dorsal layers is extremely common, whilst fusion of the intermediate and plantar muscles is a very rare occurrence. But this disposition of the intrinsic foot muscles does not account for the pre- sence of an opponens muscle. This muscle may proceed from one of two sources. Most commonly it is a development from the flexor brevis, and is thus associated 600 REPORT—1878. with the intermediate layer of muscles (e.g. man, lemurs, phalanging marsupials), It may be derived, however, from the plantar layer, and thus be associated with the adductors (e.g. lion, dog, leopard, puma, otter, and other digitigrade carnivora). Lastly, in many adult animals, the relation of the intrinsic muscles to the metatarsus, both as regards their origin and position, corresponds with transitory conditions in the foot of the human embryo.* 3. On the Gill Skeleton of Selache Maxima. By A. Macauister, M.D. The author directed the attention of the section to a fine specimen of the gill skeleton of this shark in the Museum of the University. The remarkable dentinal gill-rakers are preserved im situ, and the different portions of the cartilages of the palato-pterygoid, hyoid, and branchial arches are shown united. These are from a large shark cast ashore last year at Kinsale, but, unfortunately, much mutilated before it came into the hands of Mr. Cullen, the museum assistant of the Uni- yersity. SATURDAY, AUGUST 17, 1878. The Department did not meet. * This paper will be found in an extended form in the ‘Journal of Anatomy and Physiology ’ (Oct. 1878). TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION D.—DEPT. ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 601 MONDAY, AUGUST 19, 1878. The following Papers were read :— 1. Phenomena of Binaural Audition.* By Professor Sirvanus P. THompson, D.Sc., B.A. This paper resumed an investigation on which the author had reada paper in Sec- tion A, the preceding year. The following points summarize the communication : (a) There is an interference of the perception of sound: for the tones of two tuning-forks or other simple tones, differing slightly in pitch, and capable of inter- fering, are still heard to interfere when conducted separately to the two ears. (b) When two simple tones in unison reach the ears in opposite phases, the sensation of sound is localised at the back of the head instead of in the ears. This and the preceding phenomenon are easily experimented upon with Graham Bell’s telephones, or with indiarubber tubes to bring the sounds to the ears. (c) This localisation of an objective acoustic “ image” is independent of the pitch of the sounds. (d) When the difference of phase is partial, the sensation is localised partly in the ears, partly at the back of the head. (e) if the difference of phase be complete, and the intensities unegual, the acoustic “image,” instead of being at the middle of the back of the head, is nearer to that ear in which the sound is louder. (f) It is possible to discern the difference between two compound tones which differ only in phase but not in pitch, or in intensity of their component partial tones ; for when two such compound tones are brought to the ears so that the vibrations of any partial tone present reach the ear in opposite phases, that particular partial tone is singled out and localised at the back of the head. (g) When two simple tones are led singly to the two ears no differential tone is heard. There is some evidence that summational tones are heard. (h) To binaural audition dissonances are excessively disagreeable, and ordinary consonances harsh. (i) Vibrations mechanically conveyed to a point of the parietal or occipital regions of the skull at one side of the median line are apparently heard in the ear of the other side of the head. 2. On the Theory of Muscular Contraction. By G. F. Frrzceraup, M.A. Assuming a muscle to consist of fibriles averaging “th of a centimetre in dia- meter, and that they may be treated as a system of elongated cylinders of fluid with a superficial tension capable of variation by the action of nervous stimuli in accordance with M. Lippmann’s experiments on the relations of electrical difference of potential to the superficial tension of fluids, it may be shown that a force of 4 Inlogrammes per square centimetre might be produced, which approximates to the observed maximum contractile force. The striations in striated fibre are accounted for by the instability of uniform fluid cylinders, the necessity for a continual stimulus to keep up a given contraction by the constant repair going on in living muscle, and the heating of a muscle when it contracts, is completely explained by the fact that all fluid surfaces heat when they are allowed to contract under the action of their superficial tension. 3. On the Nervous System of Meduse. By G. J. Romangs, F.L.S. : * See ‘ Phi]. Mag.,’ Nov. 1878. 602 REPORT—-1878. TUESDAY, AUGUST 20, 1878. The following Papers were read:— 1. On the Excretion of Nitrogen. Part I1.—By the Skin. By J. Byrne Power. I have already published a paper upon the renal excretion of nitrogen, Since then I have made some experiments on the cutaneous excretion of nitrogen, the results of which, and the modus operandi, I beg to lay before this Association for the first time. I may mention that I was induced to undertake these as well as my former researches with a view to the study of the physiological action of the hot-air bath, which I have found personally beneficial, in the hopes of establishing’ its utility on a scientific basis. In considering the action of prolonged sweating: the question most practically important is, can the skin be made to act vicariously of the other organs of excretion, and, if so, to what extent? I believe that the generally received opinion is that the skin can be made so to act; and how far such opinion is warranted by experiment I hope in this paper to show more clearly than has hitherto been done. At present I confine myself to the cutaneous excretion of nitrogen, an element the excretion or retention of which in the system is a ques- tion of supreme importance, physiologically and pathologically. Without here attempting to quote the numerous authorities, I may shortly state what I consider to be the present position of this important question. Funke, by the results of his experiments upon himself and his two pupils published in 1853, not only verified those of Anselmino, Berzelius, Favre, and others as to the existence of nitrogen in the sweat, but proved its existence as urea, and was the only person, as I believe, who ever succeeded in making an estimation of the total quantity of nitrogen ex- creted by the skin in a given time until I attempted it myself. On the other hand, many experimenters—Voit, Ranke, Parkes, and others—have denied the existence of nitrogen in the sweat. They arrive at this conclusion inferentially, finding that the amount of nitrogen excreted by the kidneys and bowels was equal, and in some cases even exceeded, the quantity ingested, therefore leaving no room for any excretion by the skin. The most recent English authority on the point—the late eminent Professor Parkes,in the Croonian Lectures delivered by him before the College of Physicians in London, in 1871—after reviewing most of the authorities, thus concludes :—“ On the whole, there appears to be little doubt that, apart from detached skin structures, the balance of evidence is against the passage of nitro genous substances by the human skin.” I do not think that the form of negative proof advanced by these authorities can stand before the positive results of those who obtain nitrogen in some form or other as a constituent of the fluid portion of the sweat. With regard to Funke, I consider that his estimation of the excretion of nitrogen per diem—amounting to as much as from 4°76 to 7:045 grammes— is excessive. He arrives at these results by multiplying the quantity obtained in‘an hour by 24, necessarily assuming the constancy of the sweat secretion, which assumption is contradictory to the statement made in another part of his paper, to the effect that “in one or two hours the quantity of the supply begins to diminish, even though the temperature and movements remain unaltered, and falls to such a minimum that one can scarcely perceive the increase even during greater intervals of time.” Funke obtained the sweat from the arm only, and, having ascertained by measurement a ratio between its superficies and that of the whole ‘body, he thus estimated the entire cutaneous excretion. His experiments were made under con- ditions of more or less violent exercise. I made mine on the body in a state of rest in the hot-air bath, considering results thus obtained more referable to con- ditions of disease. I shall now, without dwelling on my many failures, briefly state the mode of collecting the excretion which I finally adopted as being the TRANSACTIONS OF SECTION D.— DEPT. ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 603 best. Having first tested the atmosphere of the ward in which I was about to operate to ascertain that it did not contain free ammonia in any quantity, I placed upon one of my hospital beds an indiarubber sheet, and over it another sheet of pure linen, upon which the person to be experimented upon lay. Over his body was placed a wooden cradle or canopy, covered outside with a thick felt, and lined inside with linen, which coverings were to be carefully adjusted round his neck. To raise the temperature with the canopy I used the lamp-furnace invented by the late Surgeon-Major Wyatt, the flame from which fitted accurately through a hole in the coverings guarded by a wooden ring. Considering the spirit-lamp of Wyatt’s furnace objectionable for many reasons, I substituted a Bunsen gas-burner. To insure the regular renewal of the air within the canopy, and to prevent its saturation, as well as to collect any free ammonia which might be evolved, I intro- duced a tube leading from a Bunsen air-pump, which tube was connected with two glass towers filled with large beads and charged with half an ounce of dilute hydrochloric acid of known strength. Through another hole in the canopy I introduced a Daniel’s hygrometer, by which I was enabled to observe the tempera- ture and calculate the degree of saturation of the atmosphere within. As the gas,, water, and re-agents employed contained some small portion of nitrogen, my first task was to ascertain the constant error arising from this source. To effect this I performed three blank experiments, omitting only the introduction of the person to be experimented upon. The result was that I obtained a small quantity of nitrogen nearly equal in each case and haying a mean value of -063 grammes, that being the total amount collected in one hour under the experimental con- ditions. The water I used was Vartry water, and when I used it unfiltered I employed the above number as a constant. As it would be necessary to use filtered water in order to eliminate epithelium, I made three similar blank experiments, using filtered Vartry water, and obtained another constant amount- ing to ‘0408 gramme of nitrogen, which I used in all experiments on filtered water. The method employed for estimating the nitrogen was that to be described hereafter. I commenced a series of experiments upon myself, with the assistance of my clinical clerk, Mr. Clune. One of these I shall now describe. I first took a sponge bath for the purpose of removing loose epithelial scalts, as well as minute fibres from the under-clothing, which I always found adhering to the skin, and having noted my pulse, respiration, bodily weight, and temperature, I entered under the canopy. The coverings being carefully adjusted round my neck, the gas-furnace- was lighted, the air-pump and hygrometer adjusted, and the experiment continued for an hour or an hour and a half, the time being carefully noted. Before leaving the canopy the pulse, respiration, and bodily temperature were again noted, also the mean temperature and. point of saturation of the atmosphere within the canopy. On leaving the canopy I got into a bath containing 20 litres of Vartry water acidu- lated with an ounce of the dilute hydrochloric acid of known strength. I took with me into this bath the linen sheet upon which I had lain whilst under the canopy, and with it I gently rubbed myself so as to remove any loose epithelial scales. On leaving the bath I again weighed myself, and in twenty minutes after I again noted my pulse, respiration, and bodily temperature. I caused the linen and india-rubber sheets, as well as the towels containing the dilute hydrochloric acid, to be washed in the water of the bath, and then brought a specimen of it to my laboratory for analysis. The process of analysis of this water which I employed was briefly as follows :—I carefully measured 100 ¢.c., and poured it into a partial-distillation flask, which I altered to suit my purposes by shortening and bending the side tube upwards towards the mouth. I now took a porcelain dish, in which I placed a small quantity of pure sand carefully cleansed with hydrochloric acid, and subsequent washing with distilled water, and moistened it with a drop of strong sulphuric acid. Hay- ing placed the dish upon a water-bath, I inverted the flask into it, and, properly suspending it, carefully evaporated the water as it gradually flowgd into the dish ; I then removed the sand from the dish, and, mixing it with soda-lime, placed it in a small combustion tube, and proceeded to estimate the quantity of nitrogen con- tained in the 100 c.c. in the manner referred to in my former paper. Hence I calculated the quantity contained in the 20 litres, and from this quantity I deducted my constant, thus ascertaining the total quantity of nitrogen excreted by the skin during the experiment. I have described an experiment in detail, as all the others. 604 REPORT—1878. were conducted in a similar manner, except when I filtered in order to get rid of epithelium, a circumstance noted in my tabular statement of results, in which case, of course I employed the constant for filtered water. I may here note that I ex- amined the deposit from the water of the bath under the microscope, and found it to contain scarcely a trace of anything but epithelial scales. On comparing my experiments with those of Funke, we find that the quantities of nitrogen obtained by Funke are much greater than mine. This difference may arise from the cireum- stance noted already, that Funke’s experiments were conducted under the con- ditions of more or less violent exercise, which I, accepting the views of Liebig, so strongly supported by the recent experiments of Professor Flint on the pedestrian Mr. Weston, believe to be always accompanied by waste of muscular tissue, and consequent increased execretion of nitrogen. I am aware that this view has been controverted by the experiments of several eminent physiologists, but I believe that my work tends somewhat to confirm it, though indirectly. I believe that the cutaneous excretion of nitrogen in normal healthy conditions is but small. But in my table will be found the results obtained from a patient suffering from Bright’s disease (marked [c]), showing an excretion of nitrogen more than double the average amount in my own case (marked [a]). I note that in case [6] the renal excretion of nitrogen was considerable, increased by the use of the hot-air bath, a result I conceive of great importance, due, I believe, to the temporary febrile condition induced by the bath, evidenced by the increased rate of pulse and bodily tempera- ture. I have since found this view confirmed by the experiments of G. Von Schleich, of Tiibingen, showing an increased excretion of urea caused by the use of the ordinary hot-water bath. But I have not as yet had an opportunity of making further researches, on this point. I have again to thank my friend Professor J, Emerson Reynolds, under whose guidance’my experiments were conducted, for his valuable and kind assistance. | Weight of Cutaneous Excretion of 4 Body a Nitrogen = ol =| 2. ale les E F Se Alccope ‘Palusdtag tL slike nce ccsedtabeesog Se es 2 a on| to | 28s eS Baht ale Sr ulaes ve coh Be | ee [oe So oes g\| 2 |)8 18 | 8 |ee|ee| e8s| gf a x ay 4 Lc = om By tof el c= an ig fl

= be) 3 | & Scie Ne | =| 2) 7 : Wy ’ ‘ i int “ % Rk i - . ' 4. t par 1 — i H in j in vie PuUye ary ,Y J I: se ab; ads AY 4iyire ome CHT La u , , , : j- iba, ei io iy 7 i ; ne * ee x "4 * ‘ F vith ow i MAA hy Pad ‘ ' , 0 a es a er*7 ¥ g* ‘4 a ot id j ie ico i owt wis eee er A = eit tae J ay, i i id i : “ 4 rayne 1 a lel fee i vi ite 'C ow , ahi Si» eee cae y a. ar : ae is oe Nat f = i * 7 a aN yiet Den a 4 + , ‘ ¢ . 4 me RN ) Saye E wees owe se cate “a ‘ GY). em get yy ihe i idyerils witatt ” Piva ve an aenn auty Ths Syne cayy (1 A ihe nbd), neat cae i lee: ya Teles aa bh AR 2 Stowe MED pitty: Se ie ah Nau mavtaiit Sehr Ohara tis. 1A ‘parte Holla mpi or aici ae B Pa Wak i i ii. ReasaeRE Treg al) +: hee ied wads + See «ey haan ie aru ies ag sk ae aes Sa Mei esa Naf ; Fresh wie % wi | Lin at aia! ff a} ihe Sy npr s ik) orp bend iw Hes ne Sosa afi A} ine a ae INDEX. [An asterish (*) signifies that no abstract of the communication is given.] BJECTS and rules of the Association, real Places and times of meeting, with names ot officers from commencement, xxviii. List of former Presidents and Secretaries - of the Sections, xxxv. List of evening lectures, xvii. Lectures to the Operative Classes, xlix. Table showing the attendance and receipts at the Annual Meetings, 1. Treasurer’s account, lii. Officers of Sectional Committees present at Dublin, liii. ; Officers and Council for 1878-79, lv. Report of the Council to the General Committee at Dublin, lvii. liecommendations adopted by the General Committee at Dublin :—In- volving grants of money, lviii; appli- cations tor reports and researches not involving grants of money, Ixi; com- munications ordered to be printed in extenso, \xiii; resolutions referred to the Council by the General Com- mittee, ]xiii. Synopsis of grants of money appropriated to scientitic purposes, lxiv. Places of meeting for 1879 and 1880, lxv. General statement of sums which have been paid on account of grants for scientific purposes, lxvi. General meetings, xxv. Address by the President, William Spottiswoode, Esq. M.A. D.C.L., LL.D., F.R.S., F.R.A.S., F.R.G.S., 1. Abel (Prof. F. J.) on patent legislation, 157; on the use of steel for structural purposes, 157. Aberdare (Lord) on the work of the Anthropometric Committee, 152. _ Aborigines, tropical, some tribes of, T. J. Hutchinson on, 589. Absorption spectrum of chlorochromic anhydride, G. J. Stoney and Prot. J. E. Reynolds on the, 434. Adam Smith’s theory of rent, W. D. Henderson on, 677. Adams (Prof. Leith) on the exploration of the Fermanagh Caves, 183. Adams (Prof. W. G.) on a new form of polariscope, 486. Adulteration Act, the, in so far as it relates to the prosecution of milk sellers, E. H. Cook on, 506. Alaska, the characteristic features of, as developed by the U.S. Survey, W. H. Dall on, 633. Alkalimetry, a new method of, by L. Siebold, 509. Alkaloids, report on the chemistry of some of the lesser-known, especially veratria and bebeerine, 105. Allen (J. R.) on the prehistoric sculptures of Ilkley, Yorkshire, 580. Aluminium alcohols, Dr. Gladstone and A. Tribe on, 508. Anatomy and Physiology, Address by Dr. McDonnell to the Department of, 593. *Anderson (Dr. A. F.) on a case of com- mensalism in the holothuria, 559. *Anderson (R.) on lightning conductors, 457. *Annual parallax of stars, researches made at Dunsink on the, by Prof. R. S. Ball, 482. Ansted (Prof.) on underground tempera- ture, 178. Anthropology, Address by Prof. Huxley to the Department of, 573. Anthropometric Committee, report of the, 152. *Ants, the habits of, Sir J. Lubbock on, 559. Arabia Petreea, a journey on foot through, by Rev. F. W. Holland, 622. Arctic Expedition, the late British, Capt. Feilden and Mr. De Rance on the geo- logical results of, 548. Artizans’ Dwellings Act, population dis- placed by, how to meet the require- ments of, by Sir J. Watson, 658. Atmosphere, the geological relations of the, T. S. Hunt on, 544. Atmospheric electricity at Madeira, re- port on arrangements for taking obser- vations of, 103, 716 *Atmospheric gas machine, a new, by J. R. Wigham, 437. Ayrton (Prof. W. HE.) and Prof. J. Perry, a new determination of the number of electrostatic units in the electro-mag- netic unit, 487 ; og the electrical pro- perties of bees’ wax and lead chloride, 497. Babbage’s analytical machine, report of the Committee appointed to consider the advisability and to estimate the expense of constructing, and of print- ing tables by its means, 92. *Baeyer’s synthesis of indigo, a short account of, by Prof. J. E. Reynolds, Lie Baily (W.H.) on some additional laby- yinthodont amphibia and fish from the coal of Jarrow colliery, near Castle- comer, county of Kilkenny, Ireland, 630; on some new species of Irish fossils, 535. Bain (Dr. W.) on the work of the Anthro- pometric Committee, 152. Balfour (F. M.) on the occupation of a table at the zoological station at Naples, 149. Balfour (Dr. I. B.) on some rare Scottish Alpine plants,570; *on Naiadacee, 570. *Ball (Dr. C.) on a new form of mining lamp, 698. Ball (Prof. R. 8.) *on the principal screws of inertia of a free or con- strained rigid body, 463; *researches made at Dunsink on the annual paral- lax of stars, 482. Ball (V.) on the new geological map of India, 5382; on some objects of ethno- logical interest collected in India and its islands, 588. Barlow (W. H.) on the use of steel for structural purposes, 157. Barnes-Lawrence (Rev. H. F.) on the possibility of establishing a “close time ” for indigenous animals, 146. Barrett (Prof.) on the exploration of the Fermanagh Caves, 183; *on a new form of trap-door electrometer, 495. Bate (C. 8.) on the possibility of estab- lishing a “close time ” for indigenous animals, 146; on the present state of our knowledge of the Crustacea: Part IV., On development, 193; on the W%i- lemesia group of Crustacea, 561. Bateman (A. E.) on Canadian statistics, 658. Beddoe (Dr.) on the work of the An- thropometric Committee, 152. Bebeerine, report on the chemistry of, 105. Bees’ wax and lead chloride, the electrical properties of, Profs. J. Perry and W. E. Ayrton on, 497. REPORT—1878. *Beighton (T. D.) on an expiring race | on the Bhutan frontier, 591. Bergeron (C.), on a process for cutting through sand-bars in rivers and harbour entrances, 708. Berthon (Rev. E. L.), on instruments for measuring the speed of ships, 219. Bessemer (H.) on the use of steel for structural purposes, 157. *Bhutan frontier, an expiring race on the, T. D. Beighton on, 591. Bicircular quartics, the geometrical treat- ment of, F. Purser on, 465. Binaural audition, the phenomena of, Prof. 8. P. Thompson on, 601. Biological Section, Address by Prof. W. H. Flower to the, 549. Boarding-out of pauper children, Miss I. M. Tod on the, 659. Boilers, the design and use of, F. J. Rowan on, 712. Bottomley (J. T.) on the elasticity of wires, 103; on the effect of propellers on the steering of vessels, 419. Bourne (S.) on a common measure of value in direct taxation, 220. Brabrook (E. W.) on the work of the Anthropometric Committee, 152; ona colour scale, 582. Bramwell (F. J.) on the elasticity of wires, 103; on patent legislation, 157 ; on the use of steel for structural pur- poses, 157; on instruments for mea- suring the speed of ships, 219. *Briges (R.) on the system of dredging usually employed in the United States, 713. Brooke (C.) on observations of luminous meteors during the years 1877-78, 258. *Brooke (Sir V.) on certain osteological characters in the Cervidx, and their probable bearings on the past history of the group, 559. Brown (J.) on the theory of voltaic action, 498. Brunel (H. M.) on instruments for mea- suring the speed of ships, 219. Buckland (Miss A. W.) on the prehistoric monuments of Cornwall as compared with those of Ireland, 578. Burrell (A.) on the geographical distri- bution of the tea plant, 638. Burton (Capt. R. F.) on the land of Midian, 630. Busk (Prof. G.) on the exploration of Kent’s Cavern, 124; on the examination of two caves near Tenby, 209; on the exploration of the settle Caves (Vic- toria Cave), 377. Byrne’s compound plate pneumatic bat- tery, W. Ladd on, 448. Caird (M.) on a common measure of value in direct taxation, 220. INDEX. *Calorific power of alimentary substances, a direct method for determining the, J. A. Wanklyn and W. J. Cooper on, 605. Campbell (Sir G.) on the work of the Anthropometric Committee, 152; on a common measure of value in direct taxation, 220. Campbell (J. H. M.) on the social aspects of trades unionism, 676. Canadian statistics, A. E. Bateman on, 658. Carbutt (E. H.) on patent legislation, 157; on the use of steel for structural purposes, 157. * Cardamine pratensis, exhibition of ger- minating specimens of,.by Dr. J. Price, 572. Cardiac hypertrophy, the rate of, W. H. Stone on, 608. Carpenter (Dr.) on the occupation of a table at the zoological station at Naples, 149. Carpenter (W. L.) on water from the Severn Tunnel springs, 511. Casey ( Prof.) on a new form of tangential equation, 457. : Cayley (Prof.) on Babbage’s analytical machine, 92; on mathematical tables, 172. Cephalotus, the six-celled glands of, and their similarity to the glands of Sar- racenia purpurea, Prof. A. Dickson on, 569. *Cervide, certain osteological characters in the, and their probable bearings on the past history of the group, Sir V. Brooke on, 559. “Cervus Megaceros,” W. Williams on, 537. Chadwick (Mr.) on a common measure of value in direct taxation, 220. *« Challenger ” Expedition, the progress of the official report of the, Sir C. Wyville Thomson on, 633. i Chasles’s theorem on systems of conics satisfying four conditions, Halphen’s new form of, Dr. T. A. Hirst on, 464. Chemical Section, Prof. M. Simpson’s Address to the, 501. Chiroptera, report on the geographical dis- tribution of the, by G. E. Dobson, 158. Chlorine, the action of, upon the nitro- prussides, Prof. E. W. Davy on, 505. Chlorochromic anhydride, the absorption spectrum of, G. J. Stoney and Prof. J. EH. Reynolds .on, 434. Circulating decimals, J. W. L. Glaisher on, 471. Circulation of the underground waters in the Jurassic, New Red Sandstone, and - Permian formations of England, and the quantity and character of the waters supplied to various towns and 717 districts from these formations, fourth report on the, with appendix, by I. Roberts, on the filtration of water through Triassic Sandstone, 382. Clarke (Hyde) on the prehistoric rela- tions of the Babylonian, Egyptian, and Chinese characters and culture, 590. Clifford (Prof.) on Babbage’s analytical machine, 92. Climate of the British Islands, Prof. H. Hennessy on the, 485. Clock with detached train, Prof. G. Forbes on a, 449. Close (Rev. M. H.) on the extent of geo- logical time, 548. “Close time” for indigenous animals, report on the possibility of establish- ing a, 146. Coal-gas of different qualities, report on the best means for the development of light from: Part I., 108. Co-efficient of friction between surfaces moving at high velocities, general re- sults of some recent experiments upon the, by Capt. D. Galton, 438. *Colorado, the Saurians of the Dakota cretaceous rocks of, Prof. E. D. Cope on, 545. Colour scale, E. W. Brabrook on a, 582. *Commensalism in the holothuria, Dr. A. F. Anderson on a case of, 559, Commerce, the courses of migration and, traced by art relics and religious emblems, Dr. J. S. Phené on, 583. Commercial crises, the periodicity of, and its physical explanation, by Prof. W. S. Jevons, 666. Common measure of value in direct tax- ation, report on a, 220. Conic in space, the eighteen co-ordinates of a, W. Spottiswoode on, 462. Control of rivers, W. Shelford on the, 690. Cook (E. H.) on the Adulteration Act in so far as it relates to the prosecution of milk sellers, 506. Cooper (W. J.) and Prof. Wanklyn *on a method of elementary organic analysis by a moist process, 517; *on a direct method for determining the calorific power of alimentary substances, 605. Cope (Prof. E. D.) *on the Saurians of the Dakota cretaceous rocks of Colorado, 545; *on the vertebrata of the Permian formation of Texas, 571. Copyhold enfranchisement, the applica- tion of, to long leases in Ireland, J. H. Edge on, 663. ; Correlation of lines of direction on the globe, and particularly of coast lines, Prof. J. R. O’Reilly on the, 547. Crania, human, methods and results of measurements of the capacity of, by Prof. W. H. Flower, 581. 718 *Creation of a public commission to pur- chase land for resale to occupiers in Treland, F. Nolan on the, 622. Crookes’s force, apparatus employed in researches on, R. J. Moss on, 489. Cross-fertilisation off plants by insects, some mechanical arrangements sub- serving, A. S. Wilson on, 568. Crosskey (Rev. H. W.) on the erratic blocks of England, Wales, and Ireland, 185; on the exploration of the Settie Caves (Victoria Cave), 377; on the circulation of underground waters, 382. Crustacea, report on the present state of our knowledge of the: Part IV., On Development, by C. 8. Bate, 193. ——, the Willemesia group of the, C. 5. Bate on, 561. *Crystalline rocks, the origin of,, T. S. Hunt on, 536. a of Donegal, the age of the, Prof. W. King on, 547. *Ctenodus (Agassiz), the genus, Dr. R. H. Traquair on, 571. Cubic surface referred to a pentad of + co-tangential points, H. M. Jeffery on a, 491. Cunningham (Dr. D. J.) on the intrinsic muscles of the mammalian foot, 599. *Cyprus,, Major Wilson on, 637. the acquisition by England of, Dr. J. S. Phené on, 634. Dall (W. H.) on the characteristic features of the Alaska, as developed by the U.S. Survey, 633. — + Darwin (G. H.) on the precession of a viscous spheroid, 482. Datum-level of the Ordnance Survey of Great Britain, second report of the Committee appointed to consider the, with a view to its establishment on a surer foundation than hitherto, and to tabulate and compare other datum- marks, 219. Davidson (Mr.) on the Kentish boring exploration, 380. Davis (J. W.) on the occurrence of certain fish remains in the coal measures, and the evidence they afford of their fresh- water origin, 539. Davy (Prof. E. W.) on the action of chlorine upon the nitroprussides, 505 ; on the action of heat on the selenate of ammonium, 509. Dawkins (Prof. W. Boyd) on the ex- ploration of Kent’s Cavern, 124; on the erratic blocks of England, Wales, and Ireland, 185; on the examination of two caves near Tenby, 209; on the exploration of the Settle Caves (Victo- ria Cave), 377. REPORT— 1878. Day (St. J. V.) on patent legislation, 157 Deacon (J. F.) on the datum-level of the Ordnance Survey of Great Britain, and . the tabulation and comparison of other datum-marks, 219. Deane (Dr.) on the erratic blocks of! England, Wales, and Ireland, 185. De La Rue (Dr.) on the oscillation-fre- quencies of solar rays, 37. De Rance (Mr.) on the circulation of underground waters, 382. and Capt. Feilden on the geological results of the late British Arctic Ex- pedition, 548. Desirability of simultaneous and iden- tical legislation for England and Ire- land, H. L. Jephson on the, 673. *Dewar (Prof. J.) on the condensation of the gases hitherto called permanent, 517. Dew-Smith (Mr.) on the occupation of a table at the zoological station at Naples, 149. Diagonal eyepiece for certain optical experiments, Prof. G. Forbes on a, 449. Diatoms, the supposed radiolarians and, of the carboniferous rocks, Prof. W. C. Williamson on, 534. Dickinson (J.) on underground tempera- ture, 178. Dickson (Prof. A.) on the stipules of Spergularia marina, 568; on the in- florescence of Senebiera didyma, 569; on the six-celled glands of Cephalotus, and their similarity to the glands of Sarracenia purpurea, 569; exhibition of specimens of Jsvetes echinospora, 570. Dillon (Capt.) on the work of the An- thropometric Committee, 152. Dillon(J.) on the effect of river or arterial drainage works upon river floods, 687. Dillon (T. A.) on a new ship-raising ma- chine, 713. Dimensional equations, Prof. J. Thomson on, 451. Dimorphic plants, A. 8. Wilson on some, 568. Disruptive discharge in air, the effect of variation of pressure on the length of, J. E..H. Gordon on, 433. Distant (Mr.) on the work of the Anthro- pometric Committee, 152. Dittmar (Prof.) on the best means for the development of light from coal- gas, 108. Dobson (G. E.) on the geographical dis- tribution of the Chiroptera, 158. *Donegal, the age of the crystalline rocks of, Prof. W. King on, 547. Drainage of the fenland,the, considered in relation to the conservancy of the rivers of Great Britain, W. H. Wheeler on, 603. INDEX. *Dredging, the system of, usually em- ployed in the United States, R. Briggs on, 713. Dresser (H. E.) on the possibility of establishing a “close time” for indi- genous animals, 146. *Dublin, the environs of, sketch of the geology of, by Prof. E. Hull, 527. ~, the port of, recent improvements in, B. B. Stoney on, 167. *___ Waterworks, P. Neville on the, 712. Ducie (the Earl of) on the work of the Anthropometric Committee, 152. *Harth’s axis, Rev. Prof. Haughton on the, 548. *Karthworks Committee, report of the, 580. Easton (E.), Address by, to the Mechani- cal Section, 679. Kclipse totale et la couronne, Dr. J. Janssen sur l’, 445. Economic Science and Statistics, Address by Prof. J. K. Ingram to the Section of, 641. Edge (J. H.) on the application of copy- hold enfranchisement to long Jeases in Treland, the assimilation of chattel and freehold succession, and the simplifi- cation of transfer of land, 663. Edmunds’ electrical phonoscope, W. Ladd on, 448. Elasticity of wires, secular experiments upon the, report of the Committee for commencing, 103. Electric lighting, the present state of, J. N. Shoolbred on, 706. Electrical properties of bees’ wax and lead clloride, Profs. J. Perry and W. E. Ayrton on the, 497. Electro-magnetic unit, a new determina- tion of the number of electrostatic units in the, by Profs. W. E. Ayrton and J. Perry, 487. *Electrometer, a new form of trapdoor, Prof. Barrett on, 495. ; Electro registering apparatus, a new form of, D. Lane on, 454. Electrostatic units in the electro-mag- netic unit, a new determination of the number of, by Profs. W. E. Ayrton and J. Perry, 487. *Elementary organic analysis by a moist process, a method of, Prof. Wanklyn and W. J. Cooper on, 517. Elliot (Sir W.) on the habits of the field- vole (Arvicola agrestis, L.), 559. *Equatorial mounting for a three-foot reflector, the Earl of Rosse on an, 477. Eribollia Mackayi, a new fossil from the Assynt quartzite in the North-Western Highlands of Scotland, Prof. J. Nicol on, 545. 719 Erratic blocks of England, Wales, and Treland, sixth report on the, 185. Etheridge (Mr.) on the Kentish boring exploration, 380. Ethnological interest, some objects of, collected in India and its islands, V. Ball on, 588. Evans (Capt.) and Sir Wm. Thomson on the tides of the southern hemisphere and of the Mediterranean, 477. Evans (Dr.J.)on the exploration of Kent's Cavern, 124; on the examination of two caves near Tenby, 209; Address by, to the Geological Section, 519; on some fossils from the Northampton Sands, 534. Everett (Prof.) on arrangements for taking certain observations in India, and observations on atmospheric elec- tricity at Madeira, 103; on under- ground temperature, 178. Excretion of nitrogen, the: Part II., By the skin, J. B. Power on, 602. Factor table for the fourth million, ac- count of the calculation of the, 172. Falk (M.), elementary demonstration of the theorem of multiplication of deter- minants, 473. Farmers, small, the condition of, and their position with reference to the land question, M. O’Brien on, 661. Farr (Dr.) on Babbage’s analytical ma- chine, 92; on the work of the Anthro- pometric Committee, 152; on acommon measure of value in direct taxation, 220. Feilden (Capt.) and Mr. De Rance on the geological results of the late British Arctic Expedition, 548. Fellows (F. P.) on the work of the Anthropometric Committee, 152. Fermanagh Caves, report on the explora- tion of the, 183. Fez and Mequinez, a journey to, Dr. A. Leared on, 631. Field (R.) on the datum-level of the Ordnance Survey of Great Britain, and’ the tabulation and comparison of other datum-marks, 219. Field-vole (Arvicola agrestis, L.), the habits of the, Sir W. Elliot on, 559. Filtration of water through Triassic sandstone, I. Roberts on the, 397. Fire-damp in mines, an instrument for indicating and measuring the, Prof. G. Forbes on, 449. Fish remains in the coal-measures, the occurrence of certain, and the evidence they afford of their fresh-water origin, J. W. Davis on, 539. FitzGerald (G. F.) on surface tension, 436; on the theory of muscular con- traction, 601. 720 FitzGerald (G. F.) G. J. Stoney, and R. J. Moss on the support of spheroidal drops and allied phenomena, 441. Fletcher (A. E.) on instruments for measuring the speed of ships, 219. Flight (W.) on observations of luminous meteors during the year 1877-78, 258. Flint factories at Portstewart and else- where in the North of Ireland, W. J. Knowles on, 579. Flood waters of rivers, on movable and fixed weirs, with reference to the im- provement of the navigation, mill power, and drainage of, with especial notice of the River Shannon, by J. Neville, 691. Flow of water in uniform régime in rivers and in open channels generally, Prof. J. Thomson on the, 434. Flower (Prof.) on the work of the An- ' thropometric Committee, 152; Address by, to the Biological Section, 549 ; methods and results of measurements of the capacity of the human crania, ~ 581. Fog signals, a short description of two kinds of, by J. R. Wigham, 437. Forbes (Prof. G.) on arrangements for taking certain observations in India, and observations on atmospheric elec- tricity at Madeira, 103; on observa- tions of luminous meteors during the year 1877-78, 258; on a diagonal eye- piece for certain optical experiments, 449; on a clock with detached train, 449; on an instrument for indicating and measuring the fire-damp in mines, 449; on the mutual action of vortex atoms and ultramundane corpuscles, 498. Fossils from the Northampton Sands, J. Evans on some, 534. in the North-West Highlands of Scotland, report on the, 130. , Irish, some new species of, W. H. Baily on, 535. Foster (Dr. C. Le Neve) on underground temperature, 178. Foster (Dr. M.) on the occupation of a table at the zoological station at Naples, 149. Fox (Major-Gen. Lane) on the work of the Anthropometric Committee, 152 ; on the examination of two caves near Tenby, 209; *on excavations at Mount Caburn, Lewes, Sussex, 580. Froude (W.) on the elasticity of wires, 103; ou the phenomena of the sta- tionary tides in the English Channel and the North Sea, and the value of tidal observations in the North Atlantic Ocean, 217; on instruments for mea- suring the speed of ships, 219; on the REPORT—1878. effect of propellers on the steering of vessels, 419. Fuller (Prof.) on Babbage’s analytical machine, 92. Furfurol, some of the derivatives of, Dr. W. Ramsay on, 512. Gages (A.) on the influence that micro- scopic vegetable organisms have had on the production of some hydrated iron ores, 545. Galilee, the survey of, Lieut. H. H. Kitchener on, 622. Galloway (Mr.) on underground tempe- rature, 178. ‘ Galton (Capt. D.) on patent legislation, 157 ; on the use of steel-for structural purposes, 157 ; on the phenomena of the stationary tides in the English Channel and the North Sea, and the value of tidal observations in the North Atlantic Ocean, 217; on the datum-level of the Ordnance Survey of Great Britain, and the tabulation and comparison of other datum-marks, 219; on the circulation of underground waters, 382; general results of some recent experiments upon the co-eflicient of friction between surfaces moving at high velocities, 438. Galton (F.) on the work of the Anthropo- metric Committee, 152. Gas for lighthouses, a new application of, by J. R. Wigham, 436. *Gases hitherto called permanent, the condensation of, Prof. J. Dewar on, 517. Gaussin’s warning regarding the slug- cishness of ships’ magnetism, Sir Wm. Thomson on, 496. Geikie (Prof.) on underground tempera- ture, 178. Geographical distribution of the Chi- roptera, G. E. Dobson on the, 158. distribution and migrations of birds, &e., on the northern shores and lands of Hudson’s Bay, Dr. J. Rae on the, 558. distribution of the tea plant, A. Burrell on the, 638. — Section, Address by Prof. Sir C. Wyville Thomson to the, 613. —— significance of North Polar ice, Dr. E. L. Moss on the 636. variations on the coast of France, Dr. J. S. Phené on some, 628. Geological map of India, the new, V. Ball on, 532. relations of the atmosphere, T. 3. Hunt on the, 544. results of the late British Arctic Expedition, Capt. Feilden and Mr. De Rance on the, 548. it INDEX. Geological Section, J. Evans’s Address to the, 519. — Survey of Ireland, the progress of the, Prof. E. Hull on, 543. —— time, the extent of, Rev. M. H. Close on, 548. *Geology of the environs of Dublin, sketch of the, by Prof. E. Hull. 527. *Gill (D.) on a new method of maintain- ing the motion of a free pendulum in vacuo, 486. Gill skeleton of. Selache maxima, Dr. A. Macalister on the, 600. Glaciation of Ireland, and the tradition of Lough Lurgan, W. M. Williams on the, 528. Gladstone (Dr.) and A. Tribe on alumi- nium alcohols, 508. Glaisher (J.) on mathematical tables, 172; on underground temperature, 178; on observations of luminous meteors during the year 1877-78, 258; on the circulation of underground waters, 382. Glaisher (J.W. L.) on Babbage’s analytical machine, 92; on mathematical tables, 172; on the law of force to any point when the orbit is a conic, 464; on the solution of a differential equation allied to Riccati’s, 469; on certain spe- cial enumerations of primes, 470; on circulating decimals, 471. Godwin-Austen (Mr.) on the Kentish boring exploration, 380. Gordon (J. E. H.), *some experiments on specific inductive capacity, 433 ; on the effect of variation of pressure on the length of disruptive discharge in air, 433. Gorilla skeleton, an infantile, some points in the osteology of, Dr, A. Thomson on, 597. Graphic formule, a simplification of, Dr, O J. Lodge on, 516. Greg (R. P.) on observations of lumi- nous meteors during the year 1877-78, 258. Giinther (Dr. A.) on the possibility of establishing a “close time” for indi- ‘genous animals, 146. Hallett (P.) on the work of the Anthro- pometric Committee, 152; on a com- mon measure of value in direct taxa- tion, 220. Halphen’s new form of Chasles’s theorem on systems of conics satisfying four conditions, Dr. T. A. Hirst on, 464. Hancock (Dr. W. N.) on patent legisla- tion, 157; on impediments to the prompt carrying out of the principles _ conceded by Parliament on the Irish . land question, 664; some statistical | 3A 1878, 721 researches into the poor removal ques- tion, with special reference to the removal of persons of Irish birth from Scotland, 667; on the importance of raising Ireland to the level of England and Scotland in the matter of indus- trial schools and compulsory education, 674. Hardman (E. T.) on the exploration of the Fermanagh Caves, 183; on lead and platinised lead as a substitute for carbon and platinised silver in Le- clanché, bichromate, and Smee’s bat- teries, 453; on the influence of “strike”? on the physical features of Treland, 541; on Hullite, a hitherto un- described mineral: with notes on the microscopic appearances, by Prof. E. Hull, 542. Harkness (Prof.) on the fossils in the North-West Highlands of Scotland, 130; on the erratic blocks of England, Wales, and Ireland, 185. Harley (Rey. R.) *on the Stanhope “ de- monstrator” or logical machine, 442 ; on certain linear differential equations, 466. Harrison (J. P.) on the work of the Anthropometric Committee, 152; on inscribed bone implements, 591. Harting (J. E.) on the possibility of establishing a ‘“‘close time ” for indi- genous animals, 146. Haughton (Rev, Prof.) on the exploration of the Fermanagh Caves, 183; *on the sun-heat received at the severalelati- tudes of the earth, taking account of the absorption of heat by the atmo- sphere, with conclusions as to the absolute radiation of earth-heat into space, and the minimum duration of geological time, 482; *on the earth’s axis, 548. : Hawkshaw (Sir J.) on the use of steel for structural purposes, 157. Hawkshaw (J. C.) on river control, 687. Heat, the mechanical equivalent of, third report of the Committee appointed to determine, 102. Henderson (W. D.) on Adam Smith’s theory of rent, 677. Hennessy (Prof. H.) on the limits of hypotheses regarding the physical pro- perties of the matter of the interior of the earth, 485; on the climate of the British Islands, 485. Herschel (Prof. A. 8.) on experiments to determine the thermal conductivities of certain rocks, 133 ; on underground temperature, 178; on observations of luminous .meteors during the year 1877-78, 258. ; Heywood (J.) on the work of the Anthro- pometric Committee, 152; on a com- 722 mon measure of value in direct taxa- tion, 220. Hicks (Dr. H.) on some new areas of pre- Cambrian rocks in North Wales, 536. Hicks (W. M.) on the mation of two cylinders in a fluid, 475. *Hinton (B. H.) on space numbers: an extension of arithmetic, 486. Hirst (Dr. T. A.) on Halphen’s new form of Chasles’s theorem on systems of conics satisfying four conditions, 464. Holland (Rey. F. W.), a journey on foot through Arabia Petrea, 622. *Holopus, the genus, Sir Wyville Thom- son on, 571. *Holothuria, a case of commensalism in the, Dr. A. F. Anderson on, 559. Howell (H. H.) on the circulation of underground waters, 382. Howorth (H. H.) on the mammoth in Siberia, 571; *on the spread of the Sclavs, 590. : Hubbard (Rt. Hon. J. G.) on a common measure of value in direct taxation, 220. Huggins (Dr.) on the oscillation-fre- quencies of solar rays, 37. Hughes (Prof. T. McK.) on the erratic blocks of England, Wales, and Ireland, 185; on the exploration of the Settle Caves (Victoria Cave), 377. Hull (Prof. E.) on underground tempera- ture, 178; on the circulation of under- ground waters, 382; *sketch of the geology of the environs of Dublin, 527; on the microscopic appearances of Hullite, a hitherto undescribed mineral, 542; on the progress of the Geological Survey of Ireland, 543. Hullite, a hitherto undescribed mineral, E. T. Hardman on: with notes on the microscopic appearances, by Prof. E. Hull, 542. Hunt (T. 8.) *on the origin of crystalline rocks, 536; on the geological rela- tions of the atmosphere, 544. Hutchinson (T. J.) on some tribes of tropical aborigines, 589. Huxley (Prof.) on the occupation of a table at the zoological station at Naples, 149; Address by, to the De- partment of Anthropology, 573. Hydrated iron ores, the influence that microscopic vegetable organisms have had on the production of, A. Gages on, 545. Hydrogeological survey of England, J. Lucas on the, 692. Importance of raising Ireland to the level of England and Scotland in the matter of industrial schools and com- REPORT— 1878. pulsory education, Dr. W. N. Hancock on the, 674. India, observations in, report on arrange- ments for the taking of, 103. ——, the new geological map of, V. Ball on, 532. *Indigo, Baeyer’s synthesis of, a short account of, by Prof. J. EH. Reynolds, 517. Ingram (Prof. J. K.), Address by, to the Section of Economic Science and Sta- tistics, 641. Insane, the education and training of the, Dr. J. Lalor on, 667. Inscribed bone implements, J. P. Harri- son on, 591. . Insect-fertilised flowers, the association of an inconspicuous corolla with pro- terogynous dichogamy in, A.S. Wilson on, 564, Instruments for measuring the speed of ships, report on, 219. . Interior of the earth, the limits of hypo- theses regarding the physical proper- ties of the matter of the, Prof. H. Hennessy on. 485. Intrinsic muscles of the mammalian foot, Dr. D. J. Cunningham on the, 599. Ireland, the Geological Survey of, Prof. E. Hull on the progress of, 543. —._, the glaciation of, and the tradition of Lough Lurgan, W. M. Williams on the, 528. ——,, the influence of “strike ’’ on the physical features of, E. T. Hardman on, 541, —_—., the rainfall of, G. J. Symons on, 692. Trish fossils, some new species of, W. H. Baily on, 535. 5 land question, impediments to the prompt carrying out of the principles conceded by Parliament on the, Dr. W. N. Hancock on, 664. Trlande, les races anciennes de 1’, par H. Martin, 585. Isochronic pendulum, D. Lane on an, 455. Tsoetes echinospura, exhibition of speci- mens of, by Prof. A. Dickson, 570. *Jacob (A. E.), exhibition of a wryneck obtained in Ireland, 572. Janssen (Dr. J.) sur une nouvelle méthode de photographie solaire et les décou- vertes qu’elle donne touchant la vérit- able nature de la photosphére, 443; sur la constitution des spectres photogra- phiques quand l’action lumineuse est extrémement courte, 445; sur l’éclipse totale et la couronne, 445. Jeffery (H. M.) on the spherical class- ee cubic with three single foci, 490; ona — _— question, the condition of small : INDEX. cubic surface referred to a pentad of co-tangential points, 491. Jeffreys (Dr. Gwyn) on the possibility of establishing a “ close time ” for indi- genous animals, 146; on the occupa- tion of a table at the zoological station at Naples, 149. Jephson (H. L.) on the desirability. of simultaneous and identical legislation for England and Ireland, 673. Jevons (Prof.) on a common measure of value in direct taxation, 220; on the pedetic action of soap, 435 ; the perio- dicity of commercial crises, and its physical explanation, 666. Jolly (W.) on the fossils in the North- West Highlands of Scotland, 130. Joule (Dr.) on the mechanical equivalent of heat, 102. Kennedy (Prof. A. B. W.) on Babbage’s analytical machine, 92. ; Kentish boring exploration, report on the, 380. Kent’s Cavern, Devonshire, fourteenth report of the Committee for exploring, 124, *King (Prof. W.) on the age of the crystalline rocks of Donegal, 547. Kitchener (Lieut. H. H.) on the survey of Galilee, 624. Knowles (W. J.) on flint factories at Portstewart and elsewhere in the North of Ireland, 579. Labyrinthodont amphibia and fish found in the coal of Jarrow colliery, near Castlecomer, county of Kilkenny, Ire- land, W. H. Baily on some additional, 530. Ladd (W.) on Edmunds’ electrical phono- scope, 448 ; on Byrne’s compound plate pneumatic battery, 448. Lagrange’s determinental equation of small oscillations, the occurrence of equal roots in, F. Purser on, 463. *___ equations, the applicability of, to certain problems of fluid motion, Prof. J. Purser on, 463. *Lake Lob, Richthofen, Prejevalsky, and, E. D. Morgan on, 629. Lalor (Dr. J.) on the education and training of the insane, 667. *Land, the creation of a public commis- sion to purchase, for resale to occupiers in Ireland, F. Nolan on, 662. —, the simplification of transfer of, J. H. Edge on, 663. farmers, and their position with re- ference to the, M. O’Brien on, 661. Lane (D.), on a new form of electro re- 723 gistering apparatus, 454; on an iso- chronic pendulum, 455. Lankester (Prof. Ray) on the occupa- tion of'atable at the zoological station at Naples, 149. Law (H.) on the discharge of sewage in tidal rivers, 695. ° Law of force to any point when the orbi is a conic, J. W. L. Glaisher on the, 464. Lawson (Inspector-Gen.) on the work of the Anthropometric Committee, 152. Lead and platinised lead as a substitute for carbon and platinised silver in Leclanché, bichromate, and Smee’s batteries, H. T. Hardman on, 453. chloride, the electrical properties of bees’ wax and, Profs. J. Perry and W. E. Ayrton on, 497. Leared (Dr. A.) on a journey to Fez and Mequinez, 631. Lebour (G. A.) on experiments to deter- mine the thermal conductivities of certain rocks, 133; on underground temperature, 178; on the circulation of underground waters, 382; on the discovery of marine shells in the Gannister beds of Northumberland, 539. Lee (J. E.) on the exploration of Kent’s Cavern, 124; on the erratic blocks of England, Wales, and Ireland, 185. Lefevre (G. Shaw) on the work of the Anthropometric Committee, 152. Left-handedness, Dr. H. Muirhead on, 582. *Lepidoptera, Irish, recent additions to the list of, by R. H. Sinclair, 572. Letts (Prof. EH. A.) on the thetines, 511. Levant, the islands in the, Dr. J. §. Phené on, 634. Levi (Prof. L.) on the work of the An- thropometric Committee, 152; on a common measure of value in direct taxation, 220. Lewis (A. L.) on the evils arising from the use of historical national names as scientific terms, 583. Lewis (Dr. W.)on the work of the Anthro- pometric Committee, 152. Lift-bridge, a new, for the Midland Great Western Railway, over the Royal Canal at Newcomen Bridge, Dublin, description of, by B. B. Stoney, 697. 4 *Lightning conductors, R. Anderson on, 457. Linear differential equations, Rev. R. Harley on certain, 466. Livingstonia: the opening up of the East African lake district, by J. Ste- venson, 636. Lockyer (J. N.) on the oscillation-fre- quencies of solar rays, 37, 342 724 Lodge (Dr. O. J.) on a simplification of graphic formule, 516. and Prof. S. P. Thompson on uni- lateral conductivity in tourmaline crystals, 495. Lough Lurgan, the tradition of, W. M. « Williams on, 528. Lubbock (Sir J.) on the exploration of Kent’s Cavern, 124; on the exploration of the Settle Caves (Victoria Cave), 377; *on the habits of ants, 559. Lucas (J.) on the hydrogeological survey of England, 692. Luff (A. P.) on the chemistry of some of the lesser-known alkaloids, especially veratria and bebeerine, 105. Luminous meteors, report on observations of, during the year 1877-78, 258. Lynam (J.) on the River Shannon: its present’ state, and the means of im- proving the navigation and the drain- age, 699. Macalister (Dr. A.) on the exploration of the Fermanagh Caves, 183; on the gill skeleton of Selache maxima, 600. McDonnell (Dr. R.), Address by, to the Department of Anatomy and Physio- logy, 593. Mackintosh (D.) on the erratic blocks of England, Wales, and Ireland, 185, Macrory (Mr.) on patent legislation, 157. Madeira, observations on atmospheric electricity at, report on arrangements for the taking of, 103. Magnetic figures, new, Prof. S, P. Thomp- son on, 450, Magnetism, ships’, Gaussin’s warning re- garding the sluggishness of, Sir Wm. Thomson on, 496. *Maguire (Prof.) on the definitions of political economy, 667. Mammalian foot, the intrinsic muscles of the, Dr. D. J. Cunningham on, 599. Mammoth in Siberia, H, H. Howorth on the, 571. *Man, new varieties of, Prof. D. Wilson on some American illustrations of, 583. Map-producing, processes of, Capt. J. Waterhouse on, 628. Marine shells, the discovery of, in the Gannister beds of Northumberland, G. A. Lebour on, 539. Martin (H.), les races anciennes de l’Irlande, 585. Mathematical tables, report on, 172. Maxwell (Prof. J. C.) on the mechanical equivalent of heat, 102; on the elas- ticity of wires, 103; on underground temperature, 178. Mechanical equivalent of heat, third REPORT—1878. report of the Committee appointed to determine the, 102. Mechanical Section, Address by E. Easton to the, 679. *Medusz, the nervous system of the, G. J. Romanes on, 601. Meldrum, (C.), report on sunspots and rainfall, 230. Mequinez, a journey to Fez and, Dr. A. Leared on, 631. Merrifield (C. W.) on Babbage’s analytical machine, 92; on patent legislation, 157; on instruments for measuring the speed of ships, 219. Metamorphic and intrusive rocks of Tyrone, J. Nolan on the, 536. *Meyer’s (Victor) apparatus for taking vapour densities of substances with high boiling points, exhibition of, by Dr. Ramsay, 517. Miall (Prof. L. C.) on the erratic blocks of England, Wales, and Ireland, 185 ; on the exploration of the Settle Caves (Victoria Cave), 377. Microphone, a new form of receiving in- strument for, W. J. Millar on, 446. Midian, the land of, Capt. R. F. Burton on, 630. Migration and commerce, the courses of, traced by art relics and religious em- blems, Dr. J. 8S. Phené on, 583. Millar (W. J.) ona new form of receiving instrument for microphone, 446. Mineral oil or paraffin wax, the estima- tion of, when mixed with other oils or fats, W. Thomson on, 508. —— white pigment, a new, Dr. T. L. Phipson on, 514. *Mining lamp, a new form of, Dr. C. Ball on, 698, *Modular curves, Prof. H. J. 8. Smith on the, 463. Molloy (B. C.) on nitric acid: its repro- duction from the lower oxides of nitro- gen, 512. Molyneux (W.) on the erratic blocks of England, Wales, and Ireland, 185; on the circulation of underground waters, 382. Monahan (J. H.), suggestions for a Bill to regulate sales of property, 662. *Morgan (E. D.) on Richthofen, Preje- valsky, and Lake Lob, 629. Morley (Mr.) on a common measure of value in direct taxation, 220. Morris (W.) on the temperature of the earth within, 456. Morton (G. H.) on the erratic blocks of England, Wales, and Ireland, 185; on the circulation of underground waters, 382. = *Moss (Dr. E. L.) on the geographi- cal significance of North Polar ice, 636, / / : INDEX. Moss (R. J.) on apparatus employed in researches on Crookes’s force, 489; on spheroidal drops, 489. —, G. J. Stoney, and G. F. Fitzgerald on the support of spheroidal drops and allied phenomena, 441. *Motion of a free pendulum in vacuo, a new method of maintaining the, D. Gill on, 486. — of two cylinders in a fluid, W. M. Hicks on the, 475. Motions produced by dilute acids on some amalgam surfaces, R. Sabine on, 435. Mouat (Dr.) on the work of the Anthro- pometric Committee, 152. *Mount Caburn, Lewes, Sussex, exca- vations at, Maj.-Gen. Lane Fox on, 580. Muirhead (Dr. H.) on left-handedness, 582. Multiplication of determinants, elemen- tary demonstration of the theorem of, by M. Falk, 473. Muscular contraction, the theory of, G. F. Fitzgerald on, 601. Naegele’s obliquely contracted pelvis, the aberrant form of the sacrum:connected with, Dr. A. Thomson on, 605. * Naiadacee, Dr. I. B. Balfour on, 570. Napier (J. R.) on patent legislation, 157; on instruments for measuring the speed of ships, 219; on the effect of pro- pellers on the steering of vessels, 419. Nectar of flowers, A. 8. Wilson on the, 567. *Nervous system of the Meduse, G. J. Romanes on the, 601. Neville (J.) on movable and fixed weirs, with reference to the improvement of the navigation, mill power, and drain- age of flood waters of rivers, with especial notice of the River Shannon, 691. *Neville (P.) on the Dublin Waterworks, 712. Newmarch (Mr.) on patent legislation, 157; on a common measure of value in direct taxation, 220. Newton (Prof.) on the possibility of es- tablishing a “close time” for indige- nous animals, 146. Nicol (Prof. J.) on Eribollia Mavkayi, a new fossil from the Assynt quartzite in the North-Western Highlands of Seot- land, 545. Nitric acid: its reproduction from the lower oxides of nitrogen, B. C. Molloy on, 512. Nitrogen, the excretion of: Part II., By the skin, J. B. Power on, 602. 725 Nitroprussides, the action of chlorine upon the, Prof. E. W. Davy on, 505. *Nolan (F.) on the creation of a public commission to purchase land for resale to occupiers in Ireland, 662. Nolan (J.) on the ancient voleanic dis- trict of Slieve Gullion, 527; on the metamorphic and intrusive rocks of Tyrone, 536. *North Polar ice, the geographical sig- nificance of, Dr. E. L. Moss on, 636. Wales, some new areas of pre-Cam- brian rocks in, Dr. H. Hicks on, 536. Northampton Sands, some fossils from the, J. Evans on, 534. Numerical science, some verbal expres- sions in, Prof. J. Thomson on, 451. O’Brien (M.) on the condition of small farmers, and their position with re- ference to the land question, 661. Ordnance Survey of Great Britain, second report of the Committee appointed to consider the datum level of the, with a view to its establishment on a surer foundation than hitherto, and to tabu- late and compare other datum-marks, 219. O’Reilly (Prof. J. P.) on the correlation of lines of direction on the globe, and particularly of coast lines, 547. Oscillation-frequencies of solar rays, ca- talogne of the, 37. Osteology of an infantile gorilla skeleton, Dr. A. Thomson on some points in the, 597. Paraffin wax, the estimation of mineral oil or, when mixed with other oils or fats, W. Thomson on, 508. Parsons (Hon. R. C.), a system of venti- lation by means of fans and punkahs worked by compressed air, for use in hospitals and barracks in India and other tropical climates, 710. Patent legislation, report of the Com- mittee appointed to watch and report to the Council on, 157. Pauper children, the boarding-out of, Miss I. M. Tod on, 659. Pedetic action of soap, Prof. W.8. Jevons on the, 435. Pengelly (W.) on the exploration of Kent’s Cavern, 124; on underground temperature, 178; on the erratic blocks of England, Wales, and Ireland, 185 ; on the circulation of underground waters, 382; on the relative ages of the raised beaches and submerged forests of Torbay, 531. Periodicity of commercial crises, the, and its physical explanation, by Prof. W. S. Jevons, 666. 726 Perry (Prof. J.) and Prof. W. E. Ayrton, a new determination of the number of electrostatic units in the electro- magnetic unit, 487; on the electrical properties of bees’ wax and lead chlo- ride, 497. Phené (Dr. J. 8.) on the courses of mi- gration and commerce, traced by art relics and religious emblems, 583; on some geographical variations on the coast of France, 628; on the acquisi- tion by England of Cyprus, and some observations on the islands in the Levant, 634. Phipson (Dr. T. L.) on some substances obtained from the root of the straw- berry, 514; on @ new mineral white pigment, 514, Phonoscope, Hdmunds’ Ladd on, 448. *Photo-chemical printing in metallic platinum, a new process of, W. Willis, jun., on, 518. Photographie solaire, une nouvelle mé- thode de, et les découvertes qu'elle donne touchant la véritable nature de la photosphere, Dr. J. Janssen sur, 443. Physieal properties of the:matter of the interior of the earth, the limits of hypotheses regarding the, Prof. H. Hennessy on, 485. Physiology, Anatcmy and, Address by Dr. McDonnell to the Department of, 593. Plant (J.) on the erratic blocks of Eng- land, Wales, and Ireland, 185; on the circulation of underground waters, 382. Plunkett (T.) on the exploration of the Fermanagh Caves, 183. Pneumatic battery, Byrne’s compound plate, W. Ladd on, 448. Polariscope, a new form of, by Prof. W. G. Adams, 486. Pole (Dr.) on Babbage’s analytical ma- chine, 92. *Political economy, the definitions of, Prof. Maguire on, 667. Poor removal question, some statistical researches into the, with special refer- ence to the removal of persons of Irish birth from Scotland, by Dr. W. N. Hancock, 667. Power (J. B.) on the excretion of nitro- gen: Part II., By the skin, 602. ‘Pre-Cambrian rocks in North Wales, some new areas of, Dr. H. Hieks on, 536. -Precession of a viscous spheroid, G. H. Darwin on the, 482. *Preece (W. H.) on recent improvements in telegraphic apparatus, 697. Prehistoric monuments of Cornwall as compared with those of Jreland, Miss A. W. Buckland on the, 578. electrical, W. REPORT—1878. Prehistoric relations of the Babylonian, Egyptian, and Chinese characters and culture, Hyde Clarke on the, 590. — sculptures of Ilkley, Yorkshire, J. R. Allen on the, 580. *Prejevalsky, Richthofen, and Lake Lob, EK. D. Morgan on, 629. Prestwich (Prof.) on the erratic blocks of England, Wales, and Ireland, 185 ; on the exploration of the Settle Caves (Victoria Cave), 377; on the Kentish boring exploration, 380; on the cireu- lation of underground waters, 382. Price (F. G. H.) on the examination of two caves near Tenby, 209. *Price (Dr. J.), exhibition of germinating specimens of Cardamine pratensis, 572. Price (J.) on the use of wind power for raising water, disposal of sewage, and drainage, with special reference to Treland, 709. Primes, certain special enumerations of, J. W. L. Glaisher on, 470. Primitive human family, C. 8. Wake on the, 592. Propellers, the effect of, on the steering of vessels, report on, 419. Purser (F.) on the occurrence of equal roots in Lagrange’s determinental equation of small oscillations, 463 ; on the geometrical treatment of bicircular quartics, 465. *Purser (Prof. J.) on the applicability of Lagrange’s equations to certain pro- blems of fluid motion, 463. F Pyridine series, summary of investiga- tions on the, by Dr. W. Ramsay, 511. *Quadric transformation, Prof. H. J. S. Smith on, 465. ” Races anciennes de 1’Irlande, les, par H. Martin, 585. *Radiolarians, some deep sea, Sir Wyville Thomson on, 571. — and diatoms of the carboniferous rocks, the supposed, Prof. W. C. William- son on, 534. Rae (Dr. J.) on the geographical distri- bution and migrations of birds, &c., on the northern shores and lands of Hudson’s Bay, 558; *on the best route to attain a high northern latitude, or the Pole itself, 636. Rainbows, certain phenomena accom: panying, Prof. 8. P. Thompson on, 45Q. Rainfall, sunspots and, report on, by C. Meldrum, 230. —— of Ireland, G. J. Symons on the, 692. Ramsay (Dr. W.), summary of investiga- tions on the pyridine series, 511; on a a INDEX. some of the derivatives of furfurol, 512; *exhibition of Victor Meyer’s apparatus for taking vapour densities of substances with high boiling points, 517. Ramsay (Prof.) on underground tempera- ture, 178. Rawson (Sir R.) on the work of the Anthropometric Committee, 152. Reade (M.) on the circulation of under- ground waters, 382. Redgrave (A.) on the work of the Anthro- pometric Committee, 152. Rent, Adam Smith’s theory of, W. D. Henderson on, 677. Reynolds (Prof. J.‘E.) on the oscillation- frequencies of solar rays, 37; *a short account of Baeyer’s synthesis of indigo, 517. and G. J. Stoney on the absorption spectrum of chlorochromic anhydride, 434. —— (Prof. 0.) on the phenomena of the stationary tidesin the English Chan- nel and the North Sea, and the value of tidal observations in the North Atlantic Ocean, 217; on the effect of propellers on the steering of vessels, 419; on the steering of screw steamers, 697. Riccati’s equation, the solution of a dif- ferential equation allied to, J. W. L. Glaisher on, 469. *Richthofen, Prejevalsky, and Lake Lob, E. D. Morgan on, 629, River control, J. C. Hawkshaw on, 687. — floods, the effect of river or arterial drainage works upon, J. Dillon ors 687. Rivers, the control of, W. Shelford on, 690. Roberts (E.) on the datum-level of the Ordnance Survey of Great Britain, and the tabulation and comparison of other datum-marks, 219. Roberts (1.) on the filtration of water through Triassic sandstone, 397. Roberts (W. C.) on the chemistry of some of the lesser-known alkaloids,especially veratria and bebeerine, 105; on the detection by means of the microphone of sounds which accompany the diffu- sion of gases through a thin septum, 517. Rocks of Ulster as a source of water- supply, W. A. Traill on the, 537. Rolleston (Prof.) on the work of the _ . Anthropometric Committee, 152; on the examination of two caves near Tenby, 209. *Romanes (G. J.) on the nervous system of the Medusz, 601. *Roscoe (Prof. H. E.) on some fluor com- pounds of vanadium, 507. *Rosse (the Earl of) on an equatorial 727 mounting for a three-foot reflector, 477. *Route, the best, to attain a high northern latitude, or the Pole itself, Dr. J. Rae on, 636. Rowan (FI. J.) on the design and use of boilers, 712. Sabine (R.) on motions produced by dilute acids on some amalgam sur- faces, 435. Sacral dimple, the occurrence of, and its possible significance, Dr. L. Tait on, 606. Sacrum, the aberrant form of the, con- nected with Naegele’s obliquely con- tracted pelvis, Dr, A. Thomson on, 605. Sales of property, suggestions for a Bill to regulate, by J. H. Monahan, 662. Sand bars in rivers and harbour en- trances, a process for cutting through, C. Bergeron on, 708. Sanford (W. A.) on the exploration of Kent’s Cavern, 124. *Saurians of the Dakota cretaceous rocks of Colorado, Prof. E. D. Cope on the, 545. Scientific terms, the evils arising from the use of historical national names as, A. L. Lewis on, 583. Sclater (Mr.) on the occupation of a table at the zoological station at Naples, 149. 4 *Sclavs, the spread of the, H. H. Howorth on, 590. Scotland, the fossils in the North-West Highlands of, report on, 130. Scottish Alpine plants, some rare, Dr. I. B. Bayley on, 570. Screw steamers, the steering of, Prof. O. Reynolds on, 697. *Screws of inertiaof a free or constrained rigid body, the principal, Prof. R. 8. Ball on, 463. Selache maxima, the gill skeleton of, Dr. A. Macalister on, 600. Selenate of ammonium, the action of heat on the, Prof. E. W. Davy on, 509. Senebiera didyma, the inflorescence of, Prof. A. Dickson on, 569. Settle Caves (Victoria Cave), sixth re- port on the exploration of the, 377. Severn Tunnel springs, water from the, W. L. Carpenter on, 511. Sewage, the discharge of, in tidal rivers, H. Law on, 695. Shaen (Mr.) on a common measure of value in direct taxation, 220. Shannon, the River: its present state, and the means of improving the navi- gation and the drainage, J. Lynam on, 699. 728 Shannon, the improvement of the navi- gation, &c., of, J. Neville on, 691. Shaw (Prof. J. J.) on some economic fallacies of trades unionists, 675. Shelford (W.) on the control of rivers, 690. Ship-raising machine, a new, T. A. Dillon on, 713. Shoolbred (J. N.) on the phenomena of the stationary tides in the English Channel and the North Sea, and the value of tidal observations in the North Atlantic Ocean, 217; on the datum- level of the Ordnance Survey of Great Britain, and the tabulation and com- parison of other datum-marks, 219 ; on instruments for measuring the speed of ships, 219; on the present state of electric lighting, 706. Siberia, the mammoth in, H. H. Howorth on, 571. Siebold (L.), a new method of alkali- metry, 509. Siemens (Dr. C. W.) on the elasticity of wires, 103; on patent legislation, 157; on the use of steel for struc- tural purposes, 157; on instruments for measuring the speed of ships, 219. Simpson (Prof. M.), Address by, to the Chemical Section, 501. *Sinclair (R. W.), recent additions to the list of Irish Lepidoptera, 572. Slieve Gullion, the ancient volcanic dis- trict of, J. Nolan on, 527. Smith (Prof. H. J. 8.) on mathematical tables, 172; *on the modular curves, 463; *on quadric transformation, 465. Soap, the pedetic action of, Prof. W. S. Jevons on the, 435. Solar rays, catalogue of the oscillation- frequencies of, 37. Sorby (H. C.) on the exploration of the Settle Caves (Victoria Cave), 377. Sounds which accompany the diffusion of gases through a thin septum, the de- tection by means of the microphone of, W. C. Roberts on, 517. *Space numbers: an extension of arith- metic, B. H. Hinton on, 486. *Specific inductive capacity, an account of some experiments on, by J. E. H. Gordon, 433. Spectres photographiques, la constitution des, quand l’action lumineuse est ex- trémement courte, Dr. J. Janssen sur, 445, *Spectroscope of unusually large aper- ture, G. J. Stoney on a, 441. Spergularia marina, the stipules of Prof. A. Dickson on the, 568. Spherical class-cubic with three single foci, H. M. Jeffery on the, 490. . REPORT—1878. Spheroidal drops, R. J. Moss on, 489. ——, the cause of travelling motion of, G. J. Stoney on, 442. ——, the support of, and allied pheno- mena, G. J. Stoney, G. F. Fitzgerald, and R. J. Moss on, 441. Spottiswoode (W.) on the oscillation- frequencies of solar rays, 37; on the eighteen co-ordinates of a conic in space, 462. Stanhope ‘demonstrator ” or logical ma- chine, Rev. R. Harley on the, 442. Stationary tides in the English Channel and the North Sea, report on the pheno- mena of the, 217. Statistics, Economic Science and, Address by Prof. J. K. Ingram to the Section of, 641. Steel for structural purposes, report on the use of, 157. Steering of screw steamers, Prof. O. Reynolds on the, 697. —— of vessels, the effect of propellers on the, report on, 419. Stevenson (J.), Livingstonia: the opening up of the East African lake district, 636. Stewart (Prof. Balfour) on the mechani- cal equivalent of heat, 102. Stokes (Prof. G. G.) on mathematical tables, 172. Stone (W. H.) on the rate of cardiac hypertrophy, 608., Stoney (B. B.) on recent improvements in the port of Dublin, 167; description of a new lift-bridge for the Midland Great Western Railway, over the Royal Canal at Newcomen Bridge, Dublin, 697. Stoney (G.J.) on the oscillation-frequen- cies of solar rays, 37 ; *on a spectroscope of unusually large aperture, 441; on the cause of travelling motion of spheroidal drops, 442. —— and Prof. J. E. Reynolds on the absorption spectrum of chlorochromic anhydride, 434. —,, G. F. Fitzgerald, and R. J. Moss on the support of spheroidal drops and allied phenomena, 441. Strachey (Maj.-Gen.) on the datum- level of the Ordnance Survey of Great Britain, and the tabulation and comparison of other datum-marks, 219. Strawberry, some substances obtained from the root of the, Dr. T. L. Phip- son on, 514. “ Strike,” the influence of, on the physical features of Ireland, E. T. Hardman on, 541. Succession, chattel and freehold, the assimilation of, J. H. Edge on, 663. Sugar contained in the nectar of various . INDEX. flowers, the amounts of, A. S. Wilson on, 504. *Sun-heat received at the several lati- tudes of the earth, taking account of the absorption of heat by the atmos- phere, with conclusions as to the abso- lute radiation of earth-heat into space, and the minimum duration of geo- logical time, Prof. Haughton on the, 482. Sunspots and rainfall, report on, by C. Meldrum, 230. Surface tension, G. F. Fitzgerald on, 436. Survey of Galilee, Lieut. H. H. Kitchener on the, 622. Symons (G. J.) on underground tem- perature 178; on the rainfall of Ire- land, 692. Tait (Dr. L.) on the occurrence of a sacral dimple and its possible signifi- cance, 606. Tait (Prof.) on the mechanical equiva- lent of heat, 102; on the elasticity of wires, 103. Tangential equation, a new form of, Prof. Casey on 457. Taxation, direct, a common measure of value in, report on, 220. Tea plant, the geographical distribution of the, A. Burrell on, 638. *Telegraphic apparatus, recent improve- ments in, W. H. Preece on, 697. Temperature of the earth within, W. Morris on the, 456. —, underground, eleventh report on the rate of increase of, downwards in various localities of dry land and under water, 178. Tenby, report on the examination of two caves containing human remains in the neighbourhood of, 209. Thermal conductivities of certain rocks, fifth report on experiments to deter- mine the, showing especially the geo- logical aspects of the investigation, 133. Thetines, Prof. E. A. Letts on the, 511. Thompson (Prof. 8. P.) on certain pheno- mena accompanying rainbows, 450; on new magnetic figures, 450; on the phenomena of binaural audition, 601. —— and Dr. O. J. Lodge on unilateral conductivity in tourmaline crystals, 495. Thomson (Dr, A.) on some points in the osteology of an infantile gorilla skeleton, 597; on the aberrant form of the sacrum connected with Nae- _gele’s obliquely contracted pelvis, 605. Thomson (Prof. Sir C. Wyville) *on the | 729 genus Holopus, 571; on some deep sea radiolarians, 571 ; Address by, to the Geographical Section, 613; *on the progress of the official report of the “ Challenger ” expedition, 633. Thomson (Prof. J.) on instruments for measuring the speed of ships, 219; on the flow of water in uniform régime in rivers and in open channels gene- rally, 434; on dimensional equations, and on some verbal expressions in numerical science, 451. Thomson (Prof. Sir Wm.) onthe mechani- cal equivalent of heat, 102 ; on arrange- ments for taking certain observations in India, and observations on atmo- spheric electricity at Madeira, 103; on the elasticity of wires, 103 ; on patent legislation, 157; on mathematical tables, 172 ; on underground tempera- ture, 178; on the phenomena of the stationary tides in the English Channel and the North Sea, and the value of tidal observations in the North Atlantic Ocean, 217 ; on the datum-level of the Ordnance Survey of Great Britain, and the tabulation and comparison of other datum-marks, 219; on instruments for measuring the speed of ships, 219; on the effect of propellers on the steering of vessels, 419; on Gaussin’s warning regarding the sluggishness of ships’ magnetism, 496; on the influence of the Straits of Dover on the tides of the British Channel and the North Sea, 639. Thomson (Prof. Sir Wm.) and Capt. Evans on the tides of the southern hemisphere and of the Mediterranean, 477. Thomson (W.) on the estimation of mineral oil or paraffin wax when mixed with other oils or fats, 508. Tichborne (Dr. C. R. C.) on some pecu- liarities of the Vartry water, and on the action of that water upon boiler plates, 517. Tidal observations at Madeira or other islands in the North Atlantic Ocean, on the value of, 217. Tiddeman (R. H.) on the erratic blocks of England, Wales, and Ireland, 185; on the exploration of the Settle Caves (Victoria Cave), 377. Tides of the British Channel and the North Sea, the influence of the Straits of Dover on the, Sir William Thomson on, 639. * —— of the southern hemisphere avd of the Mediterranean, Capt. Evans and Sir Wm. Thomson on the, 477. ——, stationary, in the English Channel and the North Sea, report on the phe- nomena of, 217, 730 Tod (Miss I. M.) on the boarding-out of pauper children, 659. Topley (Mr.) ‘on the Kentish boring exploration, 380. Torbay, the relative ages of the raised beaches and submerged forests of, W. Pengelly on, 531. Tourmaline crystals, unilateral conduc- tivity in, Prof. S. P. Thompson and Dr. O. J. Lodge on, 495. Trades unionism, the social aspects of J. H. M. Campbell on, 676. —— unionists, some economic fallacies of, Prof. J. J. Shaw on, 675. Traill (W. A.) on the rocks of Ulster as a source of water-supply, 537. Transfer of land, the simplification of, J. H. Edge on, 663. *Traquair (Dr. R. H.) on the genus Ctenodus (Agassiz), 571. Tribe (A.) and Dr. Gladstone on alumi- nium alcohols, 508. Tristram (Rev. Canon) on the possibility of establishing a “close time” for indigenous animals, 146. Tyrone, the metamorphic and intrusive rocks of, J. Nolan on, 536. Ulster, the rocks of, as a source cf water- _ supply, W. A. Traill on, 537. Ultramundane corpuscles, the mutual ac- tion of vortex atoms and, Prof. G. Forbes on, 498. Underground temperature, eleventh re- port on the rate of increase of, down- wards in various localities of dry land and under water, 178. — waters in the Jurassic, New Red Sandstone, and Permian formations of England, fourth report on the circula- tion of the, 382. Unilateral conductivity in tourmaline crystals, Prof. 8. P. Thompson and Dr. O. J. Lodge on, 495. *Vanadium, some fluor compounds of, Prof. H. E. Roscoe on, 507. Vartry water, on some peculiarities of the, and on the action of that water upon boiler plates, by Dr. C. R. C. Tichborne, 517. Ventilation, a system of, by means of fans and punkahs worked by com- pressed air, for use in hospitals and barracks in India and other tropical climatés, by the Hon. R. C. Parsons, 710. Veratria, report on the chemistry of. 105. *Vertebrata of the Permian formation of Texas, Prof, E. D. Cope cn the, 571. Vivian (E.) on the exploration of Kent’s Cavern, 124, REPORT—1878. Voltaic action, J. Brown on the theory of, 498. Vortex atoms and ultramundane corpus- cles, the mutual action of, Prof, G. Forbes on, 498, Wake (C. S.) on the primitive human family, 592. Wallace (Dr. W.) on the best means for the development of light from coal- gas, 108. Wanklyn (Prof. J. A.) and W. J. Cooper *on a method of elementary organic analysis by a moist process, 517; *on a direct method for determining the calorific power of alimentary sub- stances, 605. Waterhouse (Capt. J.) on processes of map-producing, 628. Watson (Sir J.), how to meet the re- quirements of population displaced by Artizans’ I’wellings Act, 658. Watts (Dr. W. M.) on the oscillation- frequencies of solar rays, 37. Weirs, movable and fixed, with reference to the improvement of the navigation, mill power, and drainage of flood waters of rivers, J. Neville on, with especial notice of the River Shannon, 691. Wheeler (W. H.) on the drainage of fenland considered in relation to the conservancy of the rivers of Great Britain, 693. Whitaker (W.) on the circulation of underground waters 382. Wigham (J. R.), new application of gas for lighthouses, 436; a short descrip- tion of two kinds of fog signals, 437 ; a new atmospheric gas machine, 437. *Willett (Mr.) on the Kentish boring ex- ploration, 380. Williams (W.) on “ Cervus Megaceros,”’ 537. Williams (W. M.) on the glaciation of Ire- land, and the tradition of Lough Lurgan, 528. Williamson (Dr. A. W.) on patent legis- lation, 157. Williamson (Prof. W. C.) on the supposed radiolarians and diatoms of the car- boniferous rocks, 534. Willemesia group of the Crustacea, C. 8. Bate on the, 561. *Willis (W., jun.) on a new process of photo-chemical printing in metallic platinum, 518. Wills (T.) on the best means for the development of light from coal-gas, 108. Wilson (A. S.) on the amounts of sugar contained in the nectar of various flowers, 504 ;. on the association of an INDEX. inconspicuous corolla with proterogy- nous dichogamy in insect-fertilised flowers, 564 ; on the nectar of flowers, 567; on some dimorphic plants, 568 ; on some mechanical arrangements subserving cross-fertilisation of plants by insects, 568. *Wilson (Prof. D.) on some American illustrations of new varieties of man, 583. *Wilson (Major) on Cyprus, 637. Wind power, the use of, for raising water, disposal of sewage, and drain- age, with special reference to Ireland, J. Price on, 709. 731 Woodward (C. J.) on the erratic blocks of England, Wales, and Ireland, 185. Wright (Dr. C. R. A.) on the chemistry of some of the lesser-known alkaloids, especially veratria and bebeerine, 105. *Wryneck obtained in Ireland, exhibi- tion of a, by A. E. Jacob, 572. Wynne (A. B.) on underground tempera- ture, 178. Zoological station at Naples, report of the Committee appointed to arrange with Dr. Dohrn for the occupation of a table at the, 149. BRITISH ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE. Life Members (since 1845), and all Annual Members who have not intermitted their Subscription, receive gratis all Reports published after the date of their Membership. Any other volume they require may be obtained on application at the Office of the Association, 22 Albemarle Street, Piccadilly, London, W., at the following prices, viz.—Reports for 1849-78, at two-thirds of the Publication Price ; and, for the purpose of completing their sets, any of the first seventeen volumes (of which more than 100 copies remain) at one-third of the Publication Price. Associates for the Meeting in 1878 may obtain the Volume for the Year at two-thirds of the Publication Price, PROCEEDINGS or tae FIRST ann SECOND MEETINGS, at York and Oxford, 1831 and 1832, Published at 13s. 6d. ConTENTS :—Prof. Airy, on the Progress of Astronomy ;—J. W. Lubbock, on the Tides ;—Prof. Forbes, on the Present State of Meteorology ;—Prof. Powell, on the Present State of the Science of Radiant Heat ;—Prof. Cumming, on Thermo-Electri- city ;—Sir D. Brewster, on the Progress of Optics ;—Rev. W, Whewell, on the Present State of Mineralogy ;—Rev. W. D. Conybeare, on the Recent Progress and Present State of Geology ;—Dr. Pritchard’s Review of Philological and Physical Researches. Together with Papers on Mathematics, Optics, Acoustics, Magnetism, Electricity, Chemistry, Meteorology, Geography, Geology, Zoology, Anatomy, Physiology, Botany, and the Arts ; and an Exposition of the Objects and Plan of the Association, &c. PROCEEDINGS or tas THIRD MEETING, at Cambridge, 1833, Published at 12s. (Out of Print.) ~ CONTENTS :—Proceedings of the Meeting ;—John Taylor, on Mineral Veins ;—Dr. Lindley, on the Philosophy of Botany ;—Dr. Henry, on the Physiology of the Nervous System ;—P. Barlow, on the Strength of Materials ;—S. H. Christie, on the Magnetism of the Earth ;—Rev. J. Challis, on the Analytical Theory of Hydrostatics and Hy- drodynamics ;—G, Rennie, on Hydraulics as a Branch of Engineering, Part I.;—Rey, G. Peacock, on certain Branches of Analysis, Together with Papers on Mathematics and Physics, Philosophical Instruments an@ Mechanical Arts, Natural History, Anatomy, Physiology, and History of Science, PROCEEDINGS or tae FOURTH MEETING, at Edinburgh, 1834, Published at 15s. ConTENTS :—H. G. Rogers, on the Geology of North America ;—Dr. C. Henry, on the Laws of Contagion ;—Prof, Clark, on Animal Physiology ;—Rev, L, Jenyns, on 734 Zoology ;—Rev. J. Challis, on Capillary Attraction ;—Prof. Lloyd, on Physical Optics; —G. Rennie, on Hydraulics, Part II. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, and Recommendations of the Association and its Committees. PROCEEDINGS or tus FIFTH MEETING, at Dublin, 1835, Pub- lished at 13s. 6d. CONTENTS :—Rev. W. Whewell, on the Recent Progress and Present Condition of the Mathematical Theories of Electricity, Magnetism, and Heat ;—A. Quetelet, Apergu de l’Etat actuel des Sciences Mathématiques chez les Belges ;—Capt. E. Sabine, on the Phenomena of Terrestrial Magnetism. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, Prof. Sir W. Hamilton’s Address, and Recommendations of the Association and its Committees. PROCEEDINGS or tae SIXTH MEETING, at Bristol, 1836, Pub- lished at 12s. ConTENTSs :—Prof. Daubeny, on the Present State of our Knowledge with respect to Mineral and Thermal Waters ;—Major E. Sabine, on the Direction and Intensity of the Terrestrial Magnetic Force in Scotland ;—J. Richardson, on North American Zoo- logy ;—Rev. J. Challis, on the Mathematical Theory of Fluids;—J. T. Mackay, a Comparative View of the more remarkable Plants which characterize the neighbour- hood of Dublin and Edinburgh, and the South-west of Scotland, &c. ;—J. T. Mackay, Comparative Geographical Notices of the more remarkable Plants which characterize Scotland and Ireland ;—Report of the London Sub-Committee of the Medical Section on the Motions and Sounds of the Heart ;—Second Report of the Dublin Sub-Com- mittee on the Motions and Sounds of the Heart ;—Report of the Dublin Committee on the Pathology of the Brain and Nervous System ;—J. W. Lubbock, Account of the Recent Discussions of Observations of the Tides;—Reyv. B. Powell, on deter- mining the Refractive Indices for the Standard Rays of the Solar Spectrum in various media ;—Dr. Hodgkin, on the Communication between the Arteries and Ab- sorbents ;—Prof. Phillips, Report of Experiments on Subterranean Temperature; —FProf. Hamilton, on the Validity of a Method recently proposed by G. B. Jerrard, for Transforming and Resolving Equations of Elevated Degrees. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, Prof. Daubeny’s Address, and Recommendations of the Association and its Committees. PROCEEDINGS or tas SEVENTH MEETING, at Liverpool, 1837, Published at 16s. 6d. CONTENTS :—Major E. Sabine, on the Variations of the Magnetic Intensity ob- served at different points of the Earth’s Surface ;—Rev. W. Taylor, on the various modes of Printing for the Use of the Blind ;—J. W. Lubbock, on the Discussions of Observations of the Tides ;—Prof. T. Thompson, on the Difference between the Com- position of Cast Iron produced by the Cold and Hot Blast ;—Rev. T. R. Robinson, on the Determination of the Constant of Nutation by the Greenwich Observations ;— R. W. Fox, Experiments on the Electricity of Metallic Veins, and the Temperature of Mines ;—Provisional Report of the Committee of the Medical Section of the British Association, appointed to investigate the Composition of Secretions, and the Organs producing them ;—Dr. G. O. Rees, Report from the Committee for inquiring into the Analysis of the Glands, &c., of the Human Body ;—Second Report of the London Sub-Committee of the British Association Medical Section, on the Motions and Sounds of the Heart ;—Prof. Johnston, on the Present State of our Knowledge in re- gard to Dimorphous Bodies ;—Lieut.-Col. Sykes, on the Statistics of the four Collee- torates of Dukhun, under the British Government ;—E. Hodgkinson,.on the relative Strength and other Mechanical Properties of Iron obtained from the Hot and Cold Blast ;—W. Fairbairn, on the Strength and other Properties of Iron obtained from the Hot and Cold Blast ;—Sir J. Robinson and J. §. Russell, Report of the Committee on Waves ;—Note by Major Sabine, being an Appendix to his Report on the Varia- tions of the Magnetic Intensity observed at different Points of the EHarth’s Surface ; 735 —J. Yates, on the Growth of Plants under Glass, and without any free communica- tion with the outward Air, on the Plan of Mr. N. J. Ward, of London. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, Prof, Traill’s Address, and Recom- mendations of the Association and its Committees. PROCEEDINGS or raz EIGHTH MEETING, at Newcastle, 1838, Published at 15s. CONTENTS :—Rev. W. Whewell, Account of a Level Line, measured from the Bristol Channel to the English Channel, by Mr. Bunt ;—Report on the Discussions of Tides, prepared under the direction of the Rev. W. Whewell ;—-W. 8. Harris, Account of the Progress and State of the Meteorological Observations at Plymouth ;—Major HE. Sabine, on the Magnetic Isoclinal and Isodynamic Lines in the British Islands ; —Dr. Lardner, on the Determination of the Mean Numerical Values of Rail- way Constants ;—R. Mallet, First Report upon Experiments upon the Action of Sea and River Water upon Cast and Wrought Iron ;-—R. Mallet, on the Action of a Heat of 212° Fahr., when long continued, on Inorganic and Organic Substances. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, Mr. Murchison’s Address, and Recommendations of the Association and its Committees. PROCEEDINGS or rae NINTH MEETING, at Birmingham, 1839, Published at 13s. 6d. (Out of Print.) CONTENTS :—Rev. B. Powell, Report on the Present State of our Knowledge of Refractive Indices, for the Standard Rays of the Solar Spectrum in different media; Report on the Application of the Sum assigned for Tide Calculations to Rev. W. Whewell, in a letter from T. G. Bunt, Esq. ;—H. L. Pattinson, on some Galvanic Experiments to determine the Existence or Non-Existence of Electrical Currents among Stratified Rocks, particularly those of the Mountain Limestone formation, constituting the Lead Measures of Alton Moor ;—Sir D. Brewster, Reports respecting the Two Series of Hourly Meteorological Observations kept in Scotland ;—Report on the subject of a series of Resolutions adopted by the British Association at their Meeting in August 1838, at Newcastle ;—R. Owen, Report on British Fossil Reptiles ; —E. Forbes, Report on the Distribution of the Pulmoniferous Mollusea in the British Isles ;—W. S. Harris, Third Report on the Progress of the Hourly Meteorological Register at Plymouth Dockyard. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, Rev. W. Vernon Harcourt’s Ad- dress, and Recommendations of the Association and its Committees. PROCEEDINGS or rae TENTH MEETING, at Glasgow, 1840, Published at 15s. (Out of Print.) ; CONTENTS :—Rev. B. Powell, Report on the Recent Progress of discovery relative to Radiant Heat, supplementary to a former Report on the same subject inserted in the first volume of the Reports of the British Association for the Advancement of Science ;—J. D. Forbes, Supplementary Report on Meteorology ;—W. S. Harris, Re- port on Prof. Whewell’s Anemometer, now in operation at Plymouth ;—Report on “The Motion and Sounds of the Heart,” by the London Committee of the British Association, for 1839-40;—Prof. Schénbein, an Account of Researches in Electro- Chemistry ;—R. Mallet, Second Report upon the Action of Air and Water, whether fresh or salt, clear or foul, and at various temperatures, upon Cast Iron, Wrought Iron, and Steel ;—R. W. Fox, Report on some Observations on Subterranean Tempe- rature ;—A. F. Osler, Report on the Observations recorded during the years 1837, 1838, 1839, and 1840, by the Self-registering Anemometer erected at the Philosophical Institution, Birmingham ;—Sir D. Brewster, Report respecting the Two Series of Hourly Meteorological Observations kept at Inverness and Kingussie, from Noy. Ist, 1838, to Nov. 1st, 1839 ;—W. Thompson, Report on the Fauna of Ireland: Div. Verte- bratu;—C. J. B. Williams, M.D., Report of Experiments on the Physiology of the Lungs and Air-Tubes ;—Rev. J. S. Henslow, Report of the Committee on the Preservation of Animal and Vegetable Substances. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, Mr. Murchison and Major E, Sabine’s Address, and Recommendations of the Association and its Committees, 736 PROCEEDINGS or toe ELEVENTH MEETING, at Plymouth, 1841, Published at 18s. 6d. ConrEnTs :—Rev. P. Kelland, on the Present State of our Theoretical and Expe- rimental Knowledge of the Laws of Conduction of Heat ;—G. L. Roupell, M.D., Re- port on Poisons ;—T. G. Bunt, Report on Discussions of Bristol Tides, under the direction of the Rev. W. Whewell ;—D. Ross, Report on the Discussions of Leith Tide Observations, under the direction of the Rev. W. Whewell;—W. S. Harris, upon the working of Whewell’s Anemometer at Plymouth during the past year ;— Report of a Committee appointed for the purpose of superintending the scientific co-operation of the British Association in the System of Simultaneous Observations in Terrestrial Magnetism and Meteorology ;—Reports of Committees appointed to provide Meteorological Instruments for the use of M. Agassiz and Mr. M‘Cord ;—Report of a Committee appointed to superintend the Reduction of Meteorological Observations ; —Report of a Committee for revising the Nomenclature of the Stars ;—Report of a Committee for obtaining Instruments and Registers to record Shocks and Earthquakes in Scotland and Ireland ;—Report of a Committee on the Preservation of Vegetative Powers in Seeds ;—Dr. Hodgkin, on Inquiries into the Races of Man ;—Report of the Committee appointed to report how far the Desiderata in our knowledge of the Con- dition of the Upper Strata of the Atmosphere may be supplied by means of Ascents in Balloons or otherwise, to ascertain the probable expense of such Experiments, and to draw up Directions for Observers in such circumstances ;--R. Owen, Report on British Fossil Reptiles ;—Reports on the Determination of the Mean Value of Rail- way Constants ;—Dr. D. Lardner, Second and concluding Report on the Determi- nation of the Mean Value of Railway Constants;—E. Woods, Report on Railway Constants ;—Report of a Committee on the Construction of a Constant Indicator for Steam Engines. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, Prof. Whewell’s Address, and Recommendations of the Association and its Committees, PROCEEDINGS or tap TWELFTH MEETING, at Manchester, 1842, Published at 10s. 6d. ConTENTS :—Report of the Committee appointed to conduct the co-operation of the British Association in the System of Simultaneous Magnetical and Meteorological Observations ;—Dr. J. Richardson, Report on the present State of the Ichthyology of New Zealand ;--W. S. Harris, Report on the Progress of Meteorological Observa- tions at Plymouth ;—Second Report of a Committee appointed to make Experiments on the Growth and Vitality of Seeds;—C. Vignoles, Report of the Committee on Railway Sections ;—Report of the Committee for the Preservation of Animal and Vegetable Substances ;—Dr. Lyon Playfair, Abstract of Prof. Liebig’s Report on Organic Chemistry applied to Physiology and Pathology ;—R. Owen, Report on the British Fossil Mammalia, Part I.;—R. Hunt, Researches on the Influence of Light on the Germination of Seeds and the Growth of Plants ;—L. Agassiz, Report on the Fossil Fishes of the Devonian System or Old Red Sandstone ;—W. Fairbairn, Appen- dix toa Report on the Strength and other Properties of Cast Iron obtained from the Hot and Cold Blast ;— D. Milne, Report of the Committee for Registering Shocks of Earth- quakes in Great Britain ;—Report of a Committee on the construction of a Constant Indicator for Steam-Engines, and for the determination of the Velocity of the Piston of the Self-acting Engine at different periods of the Stroke ;—J. 8. Russell, Report of a Committee on the Form of Ships ;—Report of a Committee appointed “to consider of the Rules by which the Nomenclature of Zoology may be established on a uniform and permanent basis ;”—Report of a Committee on the Vital Statistics of Large Towns in Scotland ;—Provisional Reports, and Notices of Progress in Special Researches entrusted to Committees and Individuals. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, Lord Francis Egerton’s Address, and Recommendations of the Association and its Committees, PROCEEDINGS or tue THIRTEENTH MEETING, at Cork, 1848, Published at 12s. ConrENTS :—Robert Mallet, Third Report upon the Action of Air and Water, whether fresh or salt, clear or foul, and at Various Temperatures, upon Cast Iron, 737 Wrought Iron, and Steel ;—Report of the Committee appointed to conduct the Co- operation of the British Associationin the System of Simultaneous Magnetical and Meteorological Observations ;—Sir J. F. W. Herschel, Bart., Report of the Committee appointed for the Reduction of Meteorological Observations ;—Report of the Com- mittee appointed for Experiments on Steam-Engines ;—Report of the Committee ap- pointed to continue their Experiments on the Vitality of Seeds ;—J. S. Russell, Report of a Series of Observations on the Tides of the Frith of Forth and the East Coast of Scotland ;—J. 8. Russell, Notice of a Report of the Committee on the Form of Ships ;, —4J. Blake, Report on the Physiological Action of Medicines ;—Report of the Com- mittee on Zoological Nomenclature ;—Report of the Committee for Registering the Shocks of Earthquakes, and making such Meteorological Observations as may appear” to them desirable ;—Report of the Committee for conducting Experiments with Cap- tive Balloons ;—Prof. Wheatstone, Appendix to the Report;—Report of the Com- mittee for the Translation and Publication of Foreign Scientific Memoirs ;—C. W.. Peach, on the Habits of the Marine Testacea ;—E. Forbes, Report on the Mollusca and Radiata of the Augean Sea, and'on their distribution, considered as bearing on Geology ;—L. Agassiz, Synoptical Table of British Fossil’ Fishes, arranged in the» order of the Geological Formations ;—R. Owen, Report on the British Fossil Mam- malia, Part II. ;—H. W. Binney, Report on the excavation made at the: junction of the Lower New Red Sandstone with the Coal Measures at Collyhurst ;—W. Thomp- son, Report on the Fauna of Ireland:- Div. Invertebrata ;—Provisional Reports, and Notices of Progress in Special Researches entrusted to Committees and Individuals. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, the Earl of Rosse’s Address, and Recommendations of the Association and its Committees. PROCEEDINGS or tat FOURTEENTH MERTING, at York, 1844, Published at £1. CONTENTS :—W. B. Carpenter, on the Microscopic Structure of Shells ;—J. Alder and A. Hancock, Report on the British Nudibranchiate Mollusca ;—R. Hunt, _ Researches on the Influence of Light on the Germination of Seeds and the Growth of Plants ;—Report of a Committee appointed by the British Association in 1840, for revising the Nomenclature of the Stars;—Lt.-Col. Sabine, on the: Meteorology of Toronto in Canada ;--J. Blackwall, Report on some recent researches into the Structure, Functions, and Economy of the Avaneidea made in Great Britain ;—Earl #£ Rosse, on the Construction of large Reflecting Telescopes ;— Rey. W. V. Harcourt, steport on a Gas-furnace for Experiments on Vitrifaction and‘other Applications of High Heat in the Laboratory ;—Report of the Committee for Registering Earth- quake Shocks in Scotland ;—Report of a Committee for Experiments on Steam- Engines ;—Report of the Committee to investigate’ the Varieties of the Human Race ;—Fourth Report of a Committee appointed to continue their Experiments on the Vitality of Seeds ;—W. Fairbairn, on the Consumption of Fuel and the Preven- tion of. Smoke ;—F. Ronalds, Report concerning the Observatory of the British Association at Kew ;—Sixth Report of the Commiitee appointed to conduct the Co-operation of the British Association in the System of Simultaneous Macnetical and Meteorological Observations ;—Prof. Forchhammer on the influence of Fucoidal Plants upon the Formations of the Earth, on Metamorphism in general, and par- ticularly the Metamorphosis of the Scandinavian Alum Slate ;—H. E. Strickland, Report on the Recent Progress and Present State of Ornithology ;—T. Oldham, Report of Committee appointed to conduct Observations.on Subterranean Tempera- ture in Ireland ;—Prof. Owen, Report on the Extinct Mammals of Australia, with descriptions of certain Fossils indicative of the former existence in that continent of large Marsupial Representatives of the Order Pachydermata;—W. S. Harris, Report on the working of Whewell and Osler’s Anemometers at Plymouth, for the years 1841, 1842, 1843 ;—W. R. Birt, Report on Atmospheric Waves ;—L. Agassiz, Rapport sur les Poissons Fossiles de l’Argile de Londres, with translation ;—J. S. Russell, Report on Waves ;—Provisional Reports, and Notices of Progress in Special Researches entrusted to Committees and Individuals. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, the Dean of Ely’s Address, and : Recommendations of the Association and its Committees. 1878. 3B 738 PROCEEDINGS or tue FIFTEENTH MEETING, at Cambridge, 1845, Published at 12s. CONTENTS :—Seventh Report of a Committee appointed to conduct the Co-opera- tion of the British Association in the System of Simultaneous Magnetical and Meteorological Observations ;—Lieut.-Col. Sabine, onsome Points in the Meteorology of Bombay ; Report on the Physiological Actions of Medicines ;—Dr. Von Boguslawski, on the Comet of 1843;—R. Hunt, Report on the Actinograph ;—Prof. Schénbein, on Ozone ;—Prof. Erman, on the Influence of Friction upon Thermo- Electricity ;—Baron Senftenberg, on the Self-registering Meteorological Instru- ments employed in the Observatory at Senfteriberg;—W. R. Birt, Second Report on Atmospheric Waves ;—G. R. Porter, on the Progress and Present Extent of Savings’ Banks in the United Kingdom ;—Prof. Bunsen and Dr. Playfair, Report on the Gases evolved from Iron Furnaces, with reference to the Theory of Smelting of Iron ;— Dr. Richardson, Report on the Ichthyology of the Seas of China and Japan ;— Report of the Committee on the Registration of Periodical Phenomena of Animals and Vegetables ;—Fifth Report of the Committee on the Vitality of Seeds ;— Appendix, &ec. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, Sir J. F. W. Herschel’s Address, and Recommendations of the Association-and its Committees. PROCEEDINGS or tHe SIXTEENTH MEETING, at Southampton, 1846, Published at 15s. ContTEntTs :—G. G. Stokes, Report on Recent Researches in Hydrodynamics ;— Sixth Report of the Committee on the Vitality of Seeds;—Dr. Schunck, on the Colouring Matters of Madder ;—J. Blake, on the Physiological Action of Medicines ; ---R. Hunt, Report on the Actinograph ; ;—R. Hunt, Notices on the Influence of Light on the Growth of Plants ;—R. L. Ellis, on the Recent Progress of Analysis ;—Prof. Forchhammer, on Comparative Analytical Researches on Sea Water ;—A. Erman, on the Calewlation of the Gaussian Constants for 1829 ;—G. R. Porter, on the Progress, present Amount, and probable future Condition of the Iron Manufacture in Great Britain;—W. R. Birt, Third Report on Atmospheric Waves ;—Prof. Owen, Report on the Archetype and Homologies of the Vertebrate Skeleton ;—J. Phillips, on Anemometry ;—Dr. J. Percy, Report on the Crystalline Flags ;—Addenda to Mr. Birt’s Report on Atmospheric Waves. Together with the Transactions of the Seetions, Sir R. I. Murchison’s Address, and Recommendations of the Association and its Committees. PROCEEDINGS .or tas SEVENTEENTH MEETING, at Oxford, 1847, Published at 18s. ConTENTS :—Prof. Langberg, on the Specific Gravity of Sulphuric Acid at different degrees of dilution, and on the relation which exists between the Develop- ment of Heat and the coincident contraction of Volume in Sulphuric Acid when mixed with Water;—R. Hunt, Researches on the Influence of the Solar Rays on the Growth of Plants;—R. Mallet, on the Facts of Earthquake Phenomena ;—Prof. Nilsson, on the Primitive Inhabitants of Scandinavia ;—W. Hopkins, Report on the Geological Theories of Elevation and Earthquakes ;—Dr. W. B. Carpenter, Report on the Microscopic Structure of Shells ;—-Rev. W. Whewell and Sir James C. Ross, Report upon the Recommendation of an Expedition for the purpose of completing our Knowledge of the Tides ;—Dr. Schunck, on Colouring Matters ;—Seventh Report of the Committee on the Vitality of Seeds ;—J. Glynn, on the Turbine or Horizontal Water-Wheel of France and Germany ;—Dr. R. G. Latham, on the present state and recent progress of Ethnographical Philology;—Dr. J. C. Prichard, on the various methods of Research which contribute to the Advancement of Ethnology, and of the relations of that Science to other branches of Knowledge ;—Dr. C. C. J. Bunsen, on the results of the recent Egyptian researches in reference to Asiatic and African Ethnology, and the Classification of Lancuages ;—Dr. C. Meyer, on the Importance of the Study of the Celtic Language as exhibited by the Modern Celtic Dialects still extant ;—Dr. Max Miiller, on the Relation of the Bengali to the Aryan and Aboriginal 739 Languages of India ;—W. R. Birt, Fourth Report on Atmospheric Waves ;—Profg W. H. Dove, Temperature Tables, with Introductory Remarks by Lieut.-Col. E. Sabine ; —A. Erman and H. Petersen, Third Report on the Calculation of the Gaussian Con- stants for 1829. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, Sir Robert Harry Inglis’s Address, and Recommendations of the Association and its Committees. PROCEEDINGS or tar EIGHTEENTH MEETIN G, at Swansea, 1848, Published at 9s. CONTENTS :—Rev. Prof. Powell, A Catalogue of Observations of Luminous Meteors ;—J. Glynn, on Water-pressure Engines;—R. A. Smith, on the Air and Water of Towns ;—Hight Report of Committee on the Growth and Vitality of Seeds ; —W. R. Birt, Fifth Report on Atmospheric Waves ;—E. Schunck, on Colouring Matters ;—J. P. Budd, on the advantageous use made of the gaseous escape from the Blast Furnaces at the Ystalyfera Iron Works ;—R. Hunt, Report of progress in the investigation of the Action of Carbonic Acid on the Growth of Plants allied to those of the Coal Formations ;—Prof. H. W. Dove, Supplement to the Temperature Tables printed in the Report of the British Association for 1847 ;—Remarks by Prof. Dove on his recently constructed Maps of the Monthly Isothermal Lines of the Globe, and on some of the principal Conclusions in regard to Climatology deducible from them ; ‘with an introductory Notice by Lieut.-Col. E. Sabine ;—Dr. Daubeny, on the progress of the investigation on the Influence of Carbonic Acid on the Growth of Ferns ;—J. Phillips, Notice of further progress in Anemometrical Researches;—Mr. Mallet’s Letter to the Assistant-General Secretary ;—A. Erman, Second Report on the Gaussian Constants ;—Report of a Committee relative to the expediency of recom- mending the continuance of the Toronto Magnetical and Meteorological Observatory until December 1850. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, the Marquis of Northampton’s Address, and Recommendations of the Association and its Committees. PROCEEDINGS or run NINETEENTH MEETING, at Birmingham, 1849, Published at 10s. CONTENTS :—Rev. Prof. Powell, A Catalogue of Observations of Luminous Meteors ;—Earl of Rosse, Notice of Nebulz lately observed in the Six-feet Reflector ; — Prof. Daubeny, on the Influence of Carbonic Acid Gas on the health of Plants, especially of those allied to the Fossil Remains found in the Goal Formation ;—Dr. Andrews, Report on the Heat of Combination ;—Report of the Committee on the Registration of the Periodic Phenomena of Plants and Animals ;—Ninth Report of Committee on Experiments on the Growth and Vitality of Seeds;—F. Ronalds, Report concerning the Observatory of the British Association at Kew, from Aug. 9, 1848 to Sept. 12, 1849 ;—R. Mallet, Report on the Experimental Inquiry on Railway Bar Corrosion ;—W. R. Birt, Report on the Discussion of the Electrical Observations at Kew. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, the Rev. T. R. Robinson’s Address, and Recommendations of the Association and its Committees, PROCEEDINGS or raz TWENTIETH MEETING, at Edinburgh, 1850, Published at 15s. (Out of Print.) CONTENTS:—R. Mallet, First Report on the Facts of Earthquake Phenomena ;— Rev. Prof. Powell, on Observations of Luminous Meteors ;—Dr. T. Williams, on the Structure and History of the British Annelida ;—T. C. Hunt, Results of Meteoro- _ logical Observations taken at St. Michael’s from the Ist of J. anuary, 1840, to the 31st of December, 1849;—R. Hunt, on the present State of our Knowledge of the Chemical Action of the Solar Radiations ;—Tenth Report of Committee on Experi- ments on the Growth and Vitality of Seeds ;—Major-Gen. Briggs, Report on the Aboriginal Tribes of India ;—F. Ronalds, Report concerning the Observatory of the British Association at Kew ;—E. Forbes, Report on the Investigation of British Marine Zoology by means of the Dredge ;—R. MacAndrew, Notes on the Distribution 3 B2 740 and @ange in depth of Mollusca and other Marine Animals, observed on the coasts of Spain, Portugal, Barbary, Malta, and Southern Italy in 1849 ;—Prof. Allman, on the Present State of our Knowledge of the Freshwater Polyzoa ;—Registration of the Periodical Phenomena of Plants and Animals ;—-Snggestions to Astronomers for the Observation of the Total Eclipse of the Sun on July 28, 1851. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, Sir David Brewster’s Address, and Recommendations of the Association and its Committees. PROCEEDINGS or toe TWENTY-FIRST MEETING, at Ipswich, 1851, Published at 16s. 6d. ConTrENTS:—Rev. Prof. Powell, on Observations of Luminous Meteors ;— Eleventh Report of Committee on Experiments on the Growth and Vitality of Seeds ;—Dr. J. Drew, on the Climate of Southampton ;—Dr. R. A. Smith, on the Air and Water of Towns: Action of Porous Strata, Water. and Organic Matter ;— Report of the Committee appointed to consider the probable Effects in an Econo- mical and Physical Point of View of the Destruction of Tropical Forests ;—A. Henfrey, on the Reproduct on and supposed Existence of Sexual Organs in the Higher Cryptogamous Plants ;—Dr. Daubeny, on the Nomenclature of Organic Com- pounds ;—Rev. Dr. Donaldson, on two unsolved Problems in Indo-German Philology ; —Dr. T. Williams, Report on the British Annelida;—R. Mallet, Second Report on the Facts of Earthquake Phenomena ;—Letter from Prof. Henry to Col. Sabine, on ; the System of Meteorological Observations proposed to be established in the United States ;—Col. Sabine, Report on the Kew Magnetographs ;—J. Welsh, Report on the Performance of his three Magnetographs during the Experimental Trial at the Kew Observatory ;—F. Ronalds, Report concerning the Observatory of the British Association at Kew, from September 12, 1850, to July 31, 1851 ;—Ordnance Survey of Scotland. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, Prof. Airy’s Address, and Recom- mendations of the Association and its Committees. PROCEEDINGS or tax TWENTY-SECOND MEETING, at Belfast, 1852, Published at 15s. Contents :—R. Mallet, Third Report on the Facts of Earthquake Phenomena ;— Twelfth Report of Committee on Experiments on the Growth and Vitality of Seeds; —Rey. Prof. Powell, Report on Observations of Luminous Meteors, 1851-52 ;—Dr. Gladstone, on the Influence of the Solar Radiations on the Vital Powers of Plants ; —A Manual of Ethnological Inquiry ;—Col. Sykes, Mean Temperature of the Day, and Monthly Fall of Rain at 127 Stations under the Bengal Presidency ;—Prof. J. D. Forbes, on Experiments on the Laws of the Conduction of Heat ;—R. Hunt, on the Chemical Action of the Solar Radiations ;—Dr. Hodges, on the Composition and Economy of the Flax Plant ;—W. Thompson, on the Freshwater Fishes of Ulster ;— W. Thompson, Supplementary Report on the Fauna of Ireland ;—W. Wills, on the Meteorology of Birmingham ;—J. Thomson, on the Vortex-Water-Wheel ;—J. B. Lawes and Dr. Gilbert, on the Composition of Foods in relation to Respiration and the Feeding of Animals. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, Colonel Sabine’s Address, and Recommendations of the Association and its Committees. PROCEEDINGS or tuzr TWENTY-THIRD MEETING, at Hall, 1853, Published at 10s. 6d. ConTENTS :—Rev. Prof. Powell, Report on Observations of Luminous Meteors, 1852-53 ;—James Oldham, on the Physical Features of the Humber ;—James Old- ham, on the Rise, Progress, and Present Position of Steam Navigation in Hull ;— William Fairbairn, Experimental Researches to determine the Strength of Locomo- — tive Boilers, and the causes which lead to Explosion ;—J. J. Sylvester, Provisional Report on the Theory of Determinants ;—Professor Hodges, M.D.. Report on the Gases evolved in Steeping Flax, and on the Composition and Economy of the Flax Plant ;—Thirteenth Report of Committee on Experiments on the Growth and 741 Vitality of Seeds ;—Robert Hunt, on the Chemical Action of the Solar Radiations ; —Dr. John P. Bell, Observations on the Character and Measurements of Degrada- tion of the Yorkshire Coast ;—First Report of Committee on the Physical Character of the Moon’s Surface, as compared with that of the Earth ;—R. Mallet, Provisional Report on Earthquake Wave-Transits; and on Seismometrical Instruments ;— William Fairbairn, on the Mechanical Properties of Metals as derived from repeated Meltings, exhibiting the maximum point of strength and the causes of deterioration ; -—Robert Mallet, Third Report on the Facts of Earthquake Phenomena (continued). Together with the Transactions of the Sections, Mr. Hopkins’s Address, and Recommendations of the Association and its Committees. PROCEEDINGS or tne TWENTY-FOURTH MEETING, at Liver- pool, 1854, Published at 18s. CoNTENTS :—R. Mallet, Third Report on the Facts of Earthquake Phenomena (continued) ;—Major-General Chesney, on the Construction and General Use of Efficient Life-Boats ;—Rev. Prof. Powell, Third Report on the present State of our Knowledge of Radiant Heat ;—Colonel Sabine, on some of the results obtained at the British Colonial Magnetic Observatories ;—Colonel Portlock, Report of the Committee on Earthquakes, with their proceedings respecting Seismometers ;—Dr. Gladstone, on the Influence of the Solar Radiations on the Vital Powers of Plants, Part 2 ;—Rev. Prof. Powell, Report on Observations of Luminous Meteors, 1853-54 ; —Second Report of the Committee on the Physical Character of the Moon’s Surface ; —W. G. Armstrong, on the Application of Water-Pressure Machinery ;—J. B. Lawes and Dr. Gilbert, on the Equivalency of Starch and Sugar in Food ;—Archibald Smith, on the Deviations of the Compass in Wooden and Iron Ships ;—Fourteenth Report of Committee on Experiments on the Growth and Vitality of Seeds. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, the Earl of Harrowby’s Address, and Recommendations of the Association and its Committees. PROCEEDINGS or tus TWENTY-FIFTH MEETING, at Glasgow, 1855, Published at 15s. CONTENTS :—T. Dobson, Report on the Relation between Explosions in Coal- Mines and Revolving Storms ;—Dr. Gladstone, on the Influence of the Solar Radia- tions on the Vital Powers of Plants growing under different Atmospheric Conditions, Part 3;—C. Spence Bate, on the British Edriophthalma;—J. F. Bateman, on the present state of our knowledge on the Supply of Water to Towns ;—Fifteenth Report of Committee on Experiments on the Growth and Vitality of Seeds ;—Rev. Prof. Powell, Report on Observations of Luminous Meteors, 1854-55 ;—Report of Committee appointed to inquire into the best means of ascertaining those properties of Metals and effects of various modes of treating them which are of importance to the durability and efficiency of Artillery ;—Rev. Prof. Henslow, Report on Typical Objects in Natural History ;—A. Follett Osler, Account of the Self-registering Anemometer and Rain-Gauge at the Liverpool Observatory ;—Provisional Reports. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, the Duke of Argyll’s Address, and Recommendations of the Association and its Committees. PROCEEDINGS or tar TWENTY-SIXTH MEETING, at Chel- tenham, 1856, Published at 18s. CONTENTS :—Report from the Committee appointed to investigate and report upon the effects produced upon the Channels of the Mersey by the alterations which within the last fifty years have been made in its Banks;—J. Thomson, Interim Report on progress in Researches on the Measurement of Water by Weir Boards ;— Dredging Report, Frith of Clyde, 1856 ;—Rey. B. Powell, Report on Observations of Luminous Meteors, 1855-1856 ;—Prof. Bunsen and Dr. H. E. Roscoe, Photochemical Researches ;—Rev. James Booth, on the Trigonometry of the Parabola, and the Geometrical Origin of Logarithms;—R. MacAndrew, Report on the Marine Testaceous Mollusca of the North-east Atlantic and neighbouring Seas, and the physical conditions affecting their development ;—P. P. Carpenter, Report on the present state of our knowledge with regard to the Mollusca of the West Coast of 742 North America ;—T. C. Eyton, Abstract of First Report on the Oyster Beds and Oysters of the British Shores ;—Prof. Phillips, Report on Cleavage, and Foliation in Rocks, and on the Theoretical Explanations of these Phenomena, Part 1 ;—Dr. T. Wright, on the Stratigraphical Distribution of the Oolitic Echinodermata ;—W. Fairbairn, on the Tensile Strength of Wrought Iron at various Temperatures ; —C. Atherton, on Mercantile Steam Transport Economy ;—J. 8. Bowerbank, on the Vital Powers of the Spongiadz ;—Report of a Committee upon the Experiments con- ducted at Stormontfield, near Perth, for the artificial propagation of Salmon ;—Pro- visional Report on the Measurement of Ships for Tonnage ;—On Typical Forms of Minerals, Plants and Animals for Museums ;—J. Thomson, Interim Report on Pro- gress in Researches on the Measurement of Water by Weir Boards ;—R. Mallet, on Observations with the Seismometer;—A. Cayley, on the Progress of Theoretical Dynamics ;—Report of a Committee appointed to consider the formation of a Catalogue of Philosophical Memoirs. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, Dr. Daubeny’s Address, and Recommendations of the Association and its Committees. PROCEEDINGS or tus TWENTY-SEVENTH MEETING, at Dublin, 1857, Published at 15s. CONTENTS :—A. Cayley, Report on the recent progress of Theoretical Dynamics; —Sixteenth and Final Report of Committee on Experiments on the Growth and Vitality of Seeds ;—James Oldham, C.E., continuation of Report on Steam Navigation at Hull;—Report of a Committee on the Defects of the present methods of Measur- ing and Registering the Tonnage of Shipping, as also of Marine Engine-Power, and to frame more perfect rules, in order that a correct and uniform principle may be adopted to estimate the Actual Carrying Capabilities and Working-power of Steam Ships ;—Robert Were Fox, Report on the Temperature of some Deep Mimes in Corn- =o at\ + Bt) + 18e 42 Le+ yt + tet} a étant entier négatif, et, de quelques cas dans lesquels cette somme est exprimable par une combinaison de factorielles, la notation a|+!désignant le produit des facteurs a (a+1) (a+2) &e....(a+t -1) ;—G. Dickie, M.D., Report on the Marine Zoology of Strangford Lough, County Down, and corresponding part of the Irish Channel ;—Charles Atherton, Suggestions for Statistical Inquiry into the Extent to which Mercantile Steam Transport Economy is effected by the Constructive Type of Shipping, as respects the Proportions of Length, Breadth, and Depth ;—J. S. Bower- bank, Further Report on the Vitality of the Spongiade ;—Dr. John P. Hodges, on Flax ;—Major-General Sabine, Report of the Committee on the Magnetic Survey of Great Britain ;—Rev. Baden Powell, Report on Observations of Luminous Meteors, 1856-57 ;—C. Vignoles, on the Adaptation of Suspension Bridges to sustain the passage of Railway Trains;—Prof. W. A. Miller, on Electro-Chemistry ;—John Simpson, Results of Thermometrical Observations made at the Plove7’s Wintering- place, Point Barrow, latitude 71° 21’ N., long. 156° 17’ W., in 1852-54 ;—Charles James Hargreave, on the Algebraic Couple ; and on the Equivalents of Indetermi- nate Expressions ;—Thomas Grubb, Report on the Improvement of Telescope and Equatorial Mountings ;—Prof. James Buckman, Report on the Experimental Plots in the Botanical Garden of the Royal Agricultural College at Cirencester ;—William Fairbairn, on the Resistance of Tubes to Collapse ;—George C. Hyndman, Report of the Proceedings of the Belfast Dredging Committee ;—Peter W. Barlow, on the Mechanical Effect of combining Girders and Suspension Chains, and a Comparison of the Weight of Metal in Ordinary and Suspension Girders, to produce equal de- flections with a given load ;—J. Park Harrison, Evidences of Lunar Influence on Temperature ;—Report on the Animal and Vegetable Products imported into Liver- pool from the year 1851 to 1855 (inclusive) ;—Andrew Henderson, Report on the Sta- tistics of Life-boats and Fishing-boats on the Coasts of the United Kingdom. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, the Rev. H. Lloyd’s Address, and Recommendations of the Association and its Committees. wall ;—Dr. G. Plarr, de quelques Transformations de la Somme 3¢ Sek - 743 PROCEEDINGS or txzp TWENTY-EIGHTH MEETING, .at Leeds,. September 1858, Published at 20s. CONTENTS :—R. Mallet, Fourth Report upon the Facts and Theory of Earthquake °’ Phenomena ;—Rev. Prof. Powell, Report on Observations of Luminous Meteors, 1857, 1858 ;—R. H. Meade, on some Points in the Anatomy of the Araneidea or true Spiders; especially on the internal structure of their Spinning Organs ;—W. Fairbairn, Report of the Committee on the Patent Laws ;—S. Eddy, on the Lead Mining Districts of Yorkshire ;—W. Fairbairn, on the Collapse of Glass Globes and Cylinders ;—Dr. E. Perceval Wright and Prof. J. Reay Greene, Report on the Marine Fauna of the South’ and West Coasts of Ireland ;—Prof. J. Thomson, on Experiments on the Measurement of Water by Triangular Notches in Weir Boards ;—Major-General Sabine, Report of the Committee on the Magnetic Survey of Great Britain ;—Michael. Connel.and William Keddie, Report on Animal, Vegetable, and Mineral Substances imported from Foreign Countries into the Clyde (including the Ports of Glasgow, Greenock, and Port Glasgow) in the years 1853, 1854, 1855, 1856, and 1857;—Report of the Committee on Shipping Statistics ;—Rev. H. Lloyd, D.D., Notice of the. Instruments employed in the Magnetic Survey of Ireland, with some of the Results ;—Prof. J. R. Kinahan, Report of Dublin Dredging Committee, appointed 1857-58 ;—Prof. J. R. Kinahan, Report on Crustacea.of Dublin District ;—Andrew Henderson, on River Steamers, their Form, Construction, and Fittings, with reference to the necessity for. improving the present means of Shallow-Water Navigation on the Rivers of British India ;—George C. Hyndman, Report of the Belfast Dredging Committee ;—Appendix to Mr. Vignoles’ Paper “On the Adaptation of Suspension .Bridges to sustain the passage of Railway Trains;”—Report of the Joint Committee of the Royal Society and the British Association, for procuring a.continuance of the Magnetic and Meteorological Observatories ;—R. Beckley, Description of. a Self-recording Ane- mometer. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, Prof. Owen’s Address, and Re-- commendations of the Association and its Committees. PROCEEDINGS or raze TWENTY-NINTH MEETING, at Aberdeen;. September 1859, Published at 15s. CONTENTS :—George C. Foster, Preliminary: Report on the Recent Progress and Present State of Organic Chemistry ;—Professor Buckman, Report on the Growth of Plants in the Garden of the Royal Agricultural College, Cirencester ;—Dr. A. Voelcker, Report on Field: Experiments and Laboratory Researches on the-Constituents :of, Manures essential to Cultivated Crops;—A. Thomson, of Banchory; Report ony the Aberdeen Industrial Feeding Schools ;—On the Upper Silurians. of Lesmahagow, Lanarkshire ;—Alphonse Gages, Report on.the Results obtained by the Mechanico- Chemical Examination of Rocks and Minerals ;—William Fairbairn, Experiments to determine the Efficiency of Continuous and Self-acting Breaks for Railway*Trains ;— Professor J. R. Kinahan, Report of Dublin Bay Dredging Committee for 1858-59 ;— Rev. Baden Powell, Report on Observations of Luminous: Meteors for’ 1858-59 ;— Professor Owen, Report on a Series of Skulls of various Tribes of Mankind inhabiting Nepal, collected, and presented to the British Museum, by Bryan Hi Hodgson, Egq., late Resident in Nepal, &c., &c.;—Messrs. Maskelyne, Hadow, Hardwich, and Llewelyn, . Report on the Present State of our Knowledge regarding the Photographic Image ;— G. C. Hyndman, Report of the Belfast Dredging Committee for 1859 ;—James: Oldham, Continuation of Report of the Progress of Steam Navigation at Hull ;— Charles Atherton, Mercantile Steam Transport Economy as affected by the Con- sumption of Coals ;—Warren De La Rue, Report on the present state of Celestial Photography in England ;—Professor Owen, on the Orders of Fossil and Recent Reptilia, and their Distribution in Time ;—Balfour Stewart, on some Results of the Magnetic Survey of Scotland in the years 1857 and 1858, undertaken, at the request of the British Association, by the late John Welsh, Esq., F.R.S.:—W. Fairbairn, The: Patent Laws: Report of Committee on the Patent Laws ;—J. Park Harrison, Lunar Influence on the Temperature of the Air :—Balfour Stewart, an Account of the Con- struction of the Self-recording Magnetographs at present in operation at the Kew Observatory of the British Association ;—Professor H. J. Stephen Smith, Report on the Theory of Numbers, Part I.;—Report of.the Committee.on Steamship Performance; “744 —Report of the Proceedings of the Balloon Committee of the British Association appointed .at the Meeting at Leeds ;—Prof. William 'K. Sullivan, Preliminary Report on the Solubility of Salts at Temperatures above 100° Cent., and on the Mutual Action of Salts in Solution. Together. with the Transactions of the Sections, Prince Albert’s Address, and Recommendations of the Association and its Committees. PROCEEDINGS or tax THIRTIETH MEETING, at ‘Oxford, June and July 1860, Published at 15s. CONTENTS :—James Glaisher, Report on Observations of Luminous Meteors, 1859-60 ;—J. R. Kinahan, Report of Dublin Bay Dredging Committee ;—Rev. J. Anderson, Report on the Excavations in Dura Den ;—Prof. Buckman, Report on the Experimental Plots in the Botanical Garden of the Royal Agricultural College, Cireneester ;—Rev. R.' Walker, Report of the Committee on Balloon Ascents ;—Prof. W. Thomson, Report of Committee appointed to prepare a Self-recording Atmo- spheric Electrometer for Kew,.and Portable Apparatus for observing .Atmospheric Electricity ;—William Fairbairn, Experiments to determine the Effect of Vibratory Action and long-eontinued Changes of Load upon Wrought-iron Girders ;—R. P. Greg, Catalogue of Meteorites and Fireballs, from A.D. 2 to A.D. 1860;——Prof. H. J. 8. Smith, Report on the Theory of Numbers, Part II.;—Vice-Admiral Moorsom, on the Performance of Steam-vessels, the Functions of the Screw, and the Relations of its Diameter and Pitch to the Form of the Vessel ;—Rev. W. V. Harcourt, Report on the Effects of long-continued Heat, illustrative of Geological Phenomena ;—Second Report of the Committee on Steamship Performance ;—Interim Report on the Gauging of Water by. Triangular Notches ;—List of the British Marine Invertebrate Fauna. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, Lord Wrottesley’s Address, and Recommendations of the Association and its Committees. ‘PROCEEDINGS or toe THIRTY-FIRST MEETING, at Manches- ter, Septemiber 1861, Published at ‘£1. ConTENTS :—James Glaisher, Report on Observations of Luminous Meteors ;— Dr. E. Smith, Report on the Action of Prison Diet and Discipline on the Bodily Functions of Prisoners, Part I.;—Charles Atherton, on Freight as affected by Diffe- rences in the Dynamic’ Properties of Steamships;—Warren De La Rue, Report on the Progress of Celestial Photography since the Aberdeen Meeting ;—B. Stewart, on the Theory of Exchanges, and its recent extension ;—Drs. E. Schunck, R. Angus Smith, and H. B. Roscoe, on the Recent Progress and Present Condition of Manufacturing Chemistry in the South Lancashire District ;—Dr. J. Hunt, on Ethno-Climatology ; or, the Acclimatization of Man ;—Prof. J. Thomson, on Experiments on the Gauging of Water by'Triangular Notches;—Dr. A. Voelcker, Report on Field Experiments and Laboratory Researches on the Constituents of Manures essential to cultivated Crops ;—Prof. H. Hennessy, Provisional Report on the Present State of our Knowledge respecting the Transmission of Sound-signals during Fogs at Sea ;— Dr. P. L. Sclater and F. von’ Hochstetter, Report on the Present State of our Knowledge of the Birds of the Genus Apterya living in New Zealand ;—J. G. Jeffreys, Report of the Results of Deep-sea Dredging in Zetland, with a Notice of several Species of Mollusca new to Science or to the British Isles;—Prof. J. Phillips, Contributions to a Report on the Physical Aspect of the Moon ;—W. R. Birt, Contribution to a Report on the Phy- sical Aspect of the Moon;—Dr. Collingwood and Mr. Byerley, Preliminary Report of the Dredging Committee of the Mersey and Dee ;—Third Report of the Committee on Steamship Performance ;—J. G. Jeffreys, Preliminary Report on the Best Mode of preventing the Ravages of Zeredo and other Animais in our Ships and Harbours ;— R. Mallet, Report on the Experiments made at Holyhead to ascertain the Transit- Velocity of Waves,analogous to Earthquake Waves, through the local Rock Formations ; —-T. Dobson, on the Explosions in British Coal- Mines during the year 1859 ;—J. Old- ham, Continuation of Report on Steam Navigation at Hull ;—Prof. G. Dickie, Brief Summary of a Report on the Flora of the North of Ireland ;—Prof. Owen, on the Psychical and Physical'Characters of the Mincopies, or Natives of the Andaman Islands, and on the Relations thereby indicated to other Races of Mankind ;—Colonel Sykes, Report of the Balloon Committee ;—Major-General Sabine, Report on the Re- petition of the Magnetic Survey of England ;—Interim Report of the Committee for a ee SS a a 745 Dredging on the North and East Coasts of Scatland ;—-W. Fairbairn, on the Resist- ance of Iron Plates to Statical Pressure and the Force of Impact by Projectiles at High Velocities ;—W. Fairbairn, Continuation of Report to determine the effect of Vibratory Action and long-continued Changes of Load upon Wrought-Iron Girders ; —Report of the Committee on the Law of Patents ;—Prof. H. J. S. Smith, Report on the Theory of Numbers, Part III. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, Mr. Fairbairn’s Address, and Re- commendations of the Association and its Committees. PROCKEDINGS or tat THIRTY-SECOND MEETING at Cam- bridge, October 1862, Published at £1. CONTENTS :—James Glaisher, Report on Observations of Luminous Meteors, 1861— 62 ;—G. B. Airy, on the Strains in the Interior of Beams ;—Archibald Smith and F. J. Evans, Report on the three Reports of the Liverpool Compass Committee ;— Report on Tidal Observations on the Humber ;—T. Aston, on Rifled Guns and Projectiles adapted for Attacking Armour-plate Defences ;—Extracts, relating to the Observa- tory at Kew, from a Report presented to the Portuguese Government, by Dr. J. A. de Souza ;—H. T. Mennell, Report on the Dredging of the Northumberland Coast and Dogger Bank ;—Dr. Cuthbert Collingwood, Report upon the best means of ad- vancing Science through the agency of the Mercantile Marine ;—Messrs. Williamson, Wheatstone, Thomson, Miller, Matthiessen, and Jenkin, Provisional Report on Stan- dards of Electrical Resistance ;—Preliminary Report of the Committee for investiga- ting the Chemical and Mineralogical Composition of the Granites of Donegal ;—Prof. H. Hennessy, on the Vertical Movements of the Atmosphere considered in connec- tion with Storms and Changes of Weather ;—Report of Committee on the application of Gauss’s General Theory of Terrestrial Magnetism to the Magnetic Variations ;— Fleeming Jenkin, on Thermo-electric Currents in Circuits of one Metal ;—W. Fair- bairn, on the Mechanical Properties of Iron Projectiles at High Velocities ;—A. Cay- ley, Report on the Progress of the Solutionof certain Special Problems of Dynamics; —Prof. G. G. Stokes, Report on Double Refraction ;—Fourth Report of the Committee on Steamship Performance ;—G. J, Symons, on the Fall of Rain in the British Isles jn 1860 and 1861 ;—J. Ball, on Thermometric Observations in the Alps ;—J. G. Jef- freys, Report of the Committee for. Dredging on the North and East Coasts of Scot- land ;—Report of the Committee on Technical and Scientific Evidence in Courts of Law ;—James Glaisher, Account of Hight Balloon Ascents in 1862;—Prof. H. J. S. Smith, Report on the Theory of Numbers, Part IV. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, the Rev. Prof: R. Willis’s Address, and Recommendations of the Association and its Committees. PROCEEDINGS or tat THIRTY-THIRD MEETING, at New- castle-upon-Tyne, August and September 1863, Published at £1 5s. CONTENTS :—Report of the Committee on the Application of Gun-cotton to War- like Purposes ;—A. Matthiessen, Report on the Chemical Nature of Alloys ;-—Report of the Committee on the Chemical and Mineralogical Constitution of the Granites of Donegal, and on the Rocks associated with them ;—J. G. Jeffreys, Report of the Com- mittee appointed for Exploring the Coasts of Shetland by means of the Dredge ;— G. D. Gibb, Repoit on the Physiological Effects of the Bromide of Ammonium ;—C. K. Aken, on the Transmutation of Spectral Rays, Part I.;—Dr. Robinson, Report of the Committee on Fog Signals ;—Report of the Committee on Standards of Electrical Resistance ;—E. Smith, Abstract of Report by the Indian Government on the Foods used by the Free and Jail Populations in India ;—A. Gages, Synthetical Researches on the Formation of Minerals, &c.;—R. Mallet, Preliminary Report on the Experi- mental Determination of the Temperatures of Volcanic Foci, and of the Temperature, State of Saturation, and Velocity of the issuing Gases and Vapours;—Report of the Committee on Observations of Luminous Meteors ;—Fifth Report of the Committee on Steamship Performance ;-—G. J. Allman, Report on the Present State of our Know- ledge of the Reproductive System in the Hydroida ;—J. Glaisher, Account of Five Bal- loon Ascents made in 1863 ;—P. P. Carpenter, Supplementary Report on the Present State of our Knowledge with regard to the Mollusca of the West Coast of North America ;—Prof. Airy, Report on Steam Boiler Explosions ;—C. W. Siemens, Obser- 746 vations on the Electrical Resistance and Electrification of some Insulating Materials under Pressures up to 300 Atmospheres ;—C. M. Palmer, on the Construction of Iron Ships and the Progress of Iron Shipbuilding on the Tyne, Wear, and Tees ;—Messrs. Richardson, Stevenson, and Clapham, on the Chemical Manufactures of the Northern Districts ;—Messrs. Sopwith and Richardson, on the Local Manufacture of Lead, Copper, Zine, Antimony, &c. ;—Messrs. Daglish and Forster, on the Magnesian Lime- stone of Durham ;—I. L. Bell, on the Manufacture of Iron in connexion with the Northumberland and Durham Coal-field ;—T. Spencer, on the Manufacture of Steel in the Northern District ;—Prof. H. J.S8. Smith, Report on the Theory of Numbers, Part V. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, Sir William Armstrong’s Address, and Recommendations of the Association and its Committees. PROCEEDINGS or tos THIRTY-FOURTH MEETING, at Bath, September 1864, Published at 18s. CONTENTS :—-Report of the Committee for Observations of Luminous Meteors ;-— Report of the Committee on the best means of providing for a Uniformity of Weights and Measures ;—T. 8. Cobbold, Report of Experiments respecting the Development and Migration of the Entozoa;—B. W. Richardson, Report on the Physiological Action of Nitrite of Amyl ;—J. Oldham, Report of the Committee on Tidal Observa- tions ;—G. 8. Brady, Report on Deep-sea Dredging on the Coasts of Northumberland and Durham in 1864; --J. Glaisher, Account of Nine Balloon Ascents made in 1863 and 1864 ;—J. G. Jeffreys, Further Report on Shetland Dredgings ;—Report of the Committee on the Distribution of the Organic Remains of the North Staffordshire Coal-field ;—Report of the Committee on Standards of Electrical Resistance ;—G. J. Symons, on the Fall of Rain in the British Isles in 1862 and 1863;—W. Fairbairn, Preliminary Investigation of the Mechanical Properties of the proposed Atlantic Cable. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, Sir Charles Lyell’s Address, and Recommendations of the Association and its Committees, PROCEEDINGS or tae THIRTY-FIFTH MEETING, at Birming- ham, September 1865, Published at £1 5s. CONTENTS :—J. G. Jeffreys, Report on Dredging among the Channel Isles ;—F. Buckland, Report on the Cultivation of Oysters by Natural and Artificial Methods ;— Report of the Committee for exploring Kent’s Cavern ;—Report of the Committee on Zoological Nomenclature ;—Report on the Distribution of the Organic Remains of the North Staffordshire Coal-field ;—Report on the Marine Fauna and Flora of the South Coast of Devon and Cornwall ;—Interim Report on the Resistance of Water to Floating and Immersed Bodies ;—Report on Observations of Luminous Meteors ;—Report on Dredging on the Coast of Aberdeenshire ;—J. Glaisher, Account of Three Balloon Ascents;—Interim Report on the Transmission of Sound under Water ;—G. J. Symons, on the Rainfall of the British Isles:—W. Fairbairn, on the Strength of Materials considered in relation to the Construction of Iron Ships ;— Report of the Gun-Cotton Committee ;—A. F. Osler, on the Horary and Diurnal Variations in the Direction and Motion of the Air at Wrottesley, Liverpool, and Birmingham ;—B. W. Richardson, Second Report on the Physiological Action of certain of the Amyl Compounds ;—Report on further Researches in the Lingula- flags of South Wales ;—Report of the Lunar Committee for Mapping the Surface of the Moon ;—Report on Standards of Electrical Resistance ;—Report of the Com- mittee appointed to communicate with the Russian Government respecting Mag- netical Observations at Tiflis ;—Appendix to Reporton the Distribution of the Verte- brate Remains from the North Staffordshire Coal-field ;—H. Woodward, First Report on the Structure and Classification of the Fossil Crustacea ;—Prof. H. J. 8. Smith, Report on the Theory of Numbers, Part VI. ;—Report on the best means of providing for a Uniformity of Weights and Measures, with reference to the interests of Science ; —A.G. Findlay, on the Bed of the Ocean ;—Prof. A. W. Williamson, on the Com- position of Gases evolved by the Bath Spring called King’s Bath. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, Prof. Phillips’s Address, and Re- commendations of the Association and its Committees, 747 PROCEEDINGS or razr THIRTY-SIXTH MEETING, at Notting- ham, August 1866, Published at £1 4s. CONTENTS :—Second Report on Kent’s Cavern, Devonshire ;—A. Matthiessen, Preliminary Report on the Chemical Nature of Cast Iron ;—Report on Observations of Luminous Meteors ;—W. 8. Mitchell, Report on the Alum Bay Leaf-bed ;— Report on the Resistance of Water to Floating and Immersed Bodies ;—Dr. Norris, Report on Muscular Ivritability ;—Dr. Richardson, Report on the Physiological Action of certain compounds of Amyl and Ethyl ;—H. Woodward, Second Report on the Structure and Classification of the Fossil Crustacea ;—Second Report on the “* Menevian Group,” and the other Formations at St. David’s, Pembrokeshire ; —J.G. Jeffreys, Report on Dredging among the Hebrides;—Rev. A. M. Norman, Report on the Coasts of the Hebrides, Part II. ;—J. Alder, Notices of some Inverte- brata, in connexion with Mr. Jeffreys’s Report;—G. 8. Brady, Report on the Ostracoda dredged amongst the Hebrides ;—Report on Dredging in the Moray Firth ; —Report on the Transmission of Sound-Signals under Water ;—Report of the Lunar Committee ;—Report of the Rainfall Committee ;—Report on the best means of providing for a Uniformity of Weights and Measures, with reference to the Interests of Science ;—J. Glaisher, Account of Three Balloon Ascents ;—Report on the Extinct Birds of the Mascarene Islands ;—Report on the Penetration of Iron-clad Ships by Steel Shot ;—J. A. Wanklyn, Report on Isomerism among the Alcohols ;—Report on Scientific Evidence in Courts of Law ;—A. L. Adams, Second Report on Maltese Fossiliferous Caves, &c. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, Mr. Grove’s Address, and Recom- mendations of the Association and its Committees. PROCEEDINGS or tHe THIRTY-SEVENTH MEETING, at Dundee, September 1867, Published at £1 6s. CONTENTS :—Report of the Committee for Mapping the Surface of the Moon ;— Third Report on Kent’s Cavern, Devonshire ;—On the present State of the Manu- facture of Iron in Great Britain ;—Third Report on the Structure and Classification of the Fossil Crustacea ;—Report on the Physiological Action of the Methyl Com- pounds ;—Preliminary Report on the Exploration of the Plant-Beds of North Green- land ;—Report of the Steamship Performance Committee ;—On the Meteorology of Port Louis, in the Island of Mauritius ;—On the Construction and Works of the Highland Railway ;—Experimental Researches on the Mechanical Properties of Steel ;—Report on the Marine Fauna and Flora of the South Coast of Devon and Cornwall ;—Supplement to a Report on the Extinct Didine Birds of the Mascarene Islands ;—Report on Observations of Luminous Meteors ;—Fourth Report on Dredging among the Shetland Isles ;—Preliminary Report on the Crustacea, &c., procured by the Shetland Dredging Committee in 1867 ;—Report on the Foraminifera obtained in the Shetland Seas ;—Second Report of the Rainfall Committee ;—Repcrt on the best means of providing for a Uniformity of Weights and Measures, with reference to the interests of Science ;—Report on Standards of Electrical Resistance. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, and Recommendations of the Association and its Committees. PROCEEDINGS or tan THIRTY-EIGHTH MEETING, at Nor- wich, August 1868, Published at £1 5s. CONTENTS :—Report of the Lunar Committee ;—Fourth Report on Kent's Cavern, Devonshire ;—On Puddling Iron ;—Fourth Report on the Structure and Classification of the Fossil Crustacea ;—Report on British Fossil Corals ;—Report on Spectroscopic Investigations of Animal Substances ;—Report of Steamship Perform- ance Committee ;—Spectrum Analysis of the Heavenly Bodies ;—On Stellar Spectro- metry ;—Report on the Physiological Action of the Methyl and allied Compounds ;— Report on the Action of Mercury on the Biliary Secretion ;—Last Report on Dredg- ing among the Shetland Isles ;—Reports on the Crustacea, &c., and on the Annelida and Foraminifera from the Shetland Dredgings ;—Report on the Chemical Nature of _ Cast Iron, Part I.;—Interim Report on the Safety of Merchant Ships and their Passengers ;—Report on Observations of Luminous Meteors ;—Preliminary Report on Mineral Veins containing Organic Remains;—Report on the Desirability of 748 Explorations between India and China;—Report of Rainfall Committee ;—Re- port on Synthetical Researches on Organic Acids ;—Report on Uniformity of Weights and Measures ;—Report of the Committee on Tidal Observations ;—Report of the Committee on Underground Temperature ;—Changes of the Moon’s Surface ;—Re- port on Polyatomic Cyanides. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, Dr. Hooker’s Address, and Recom- mendations of the Association and its Committees. PROCEEDINGS or tae THIRTY-NINTH MEETING, at Exeter, August 1869, Published at £1 2s. CONTENTS :—Report on the Plant-beds of North Greenland ;—Report on the existing knowledge on the Stability, Propulsion, and Sea going qualities of Ships ; —Report on Steam-boiler Explosions ;—Preliminary Report on the Determination of the Gases existing in Solution in Well-waters;—The Pressure of Taxation on Real Property ;—On the Chemical Reactions of Light discovered by Prof, Tyndall ;— On Fossils obtained at Kiltorkan Quarry, co. Kilkenny ;—Report of the Lunar Com- mittee ;—Report on the Chemical Nature of Cast Iron ;—Report on the Marine Fauna and Flora of the South Coast of Devon and Cornwall ;—Report on the Practicability of establishing “a Close Time ” for the Protection of Indigenous Animals ;—Experi- mental Researches on the Mechanical Properties of Steel;—Second Report on British Fossil Corals ;—Report of the Committee appointed to get cut and prepared Sections of Mountain-Limestone Corals for Photographing ;—Report on the Rate of Increase of Underground Temperature ;—Fifth Report on Kent’s Cavern, Devon- shire ;—Report on the Connexion between Chemical Constitution and Physiological Action ;—On Emission, Absorption, and Reflection of Obscure Heat ;—Report on Observations of Luminous Meteors ;—Report on Uniformity of Weights and Measures ; —Report on the Treatment and Utilization of Sewage ;—Supplement to Second Report of the Steamship-Performance Committee ;—Report on Recent Progress in Elliptic and Hyperelliptic Functions ;—Report on Mineral Veins in Carboniferous Limestone and their Organic Contents ;—Notes on the Foraminifera of Mineral Veins and the Adjacent Strata ;—Report of the Rainfall Committee ;—Interim Re- port on the Laws of the Flow and Action of Water containing Solid Matter in Suspension ;—Interim Report on Agricultural Machinery ;—Report on the Physio- logical Action of Methyl and Allied Series ;—On the Influence of Form considered in Relation to the Strength of Railway-axles and other portions of Machinery sub- jected to Rapid Alterations of Strain;—On the Penetration of Armour-plates with Long Shells of Large Capacity fired obliquely ;—Report on Standards of Electrical Resistance. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, Prof. Stokes’s Address, and Re- commendations of the Association and its Committees. PROCEEDINGS or tos FORTIETH MEETING, at Liverpool, Sep- tember 1870, Published at 18s. CONTENTS :—Report on Steam-boiler Explosions ;—Report of the Committee on the Hematite Iron-ores of Great Britain and Ireland ;—Report on the Sedimentary Deposits of the River Onny ;—Report on the Chemical Nature of Cast Iron ;—Re- port on the practicability of establishing a “Close Time” for the protection of Indigenous Animals ;—Report on Standards of Electrical Resistance ;—Sixth Report on Kent’s Cavern ;—Third Report on Underground Temperature ;—Second Report of the Committee appointed to get cut and prepared Sections of Mountain-Limestone Corals ;—Second Report on the Stability, Propulsion, and Sea-going Qualities of Ships ;— Report on Earthquakes in Scotland ;— Report on the Treatment and Utili- zation of Sewage ;—Report on Observations of Luminous Meteors, 1869-70 ;—Report on Recent Progress in Elliptic and Hyperelliptic Functions;—Report on Tidal Ob- servations ;—On a new Steam-power Meter ;—Report on the Action of the Methyl and Allied Series;—Report of the Rainfall Committee;—Report on the Heat generated in the Blood in the Process of Arterialization ;—Report on the best means of providing for Uniformity of Weights and Measures. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, Prof. Huxley’s Address, and Re- commendations of the Association and its Committees. Sei 749 PROCEEDINGS or raz FORTY-FIRST MEETING, at Edinburgh, * August 1871, Published at 16s. CONTENTS :-—Seventh Report on Kent’s Cavern;—Fourth Report on Under- ground Temperature ;—Report on Observations of Luminous Meteors, 1870-71 ;— Fifth Report on the Structure and Classification of the Fossil Crustacea ;—Report of the Committee appointed for the purpose of urging on Her Majesty’s Government the expediency of arranging and tabulating the results of the approaching Census in the three several parts of the United Kingdom in such a manner as to admit of ready and effective comparison ;—Report of the Committee appointed for the purpose of Superintending the Publication of Abstracts of Chemical Papers ;—Report of the Committee for discussing Observations of Lunar Objects suspected of change ;— Second Provisional Report on the Thermal Conductivity of Metals ;—Report on the Rainfall of the British Isles;—Third Report on the British Fossil Corals ;— Report on the Heat generated in the Blood during the Process of Arterialization ; —Report of the Committee appointed to consider the subject of Physiological Experimentation ;—Report on the Physiological Action of Organic Chemical Com- pounds ;—Report of the Committee appointed to get cut and prepared Sections of Mountain-Limestone Corals ;—Second Report on Steam-Boiler Explosions ;—Re- port on the Treatment and Utilization of Sewage ;—Report on promoting the Foun- dation of Zoological Stations in different parts of the World ;—Preliminary Report on the Thermal Equivalents of the Oxides of Chlorine ;- Report on the practi- cability of establishing a “Close Time” for the protection of Indigenous Animals ;—Report on Earthquakes in Scotland ;—Report on the best means of pro- viding for a Uniformity of Weights and Measures ;—Report on Tidal Observations. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, Sir William Thomson’s Address, and Recommendations of the Association and its Committees. PROCEEDINGS or taz FORTY-SECOND MEETING, at Brighton, August 1872, Published at £1 4s. CoNTENTs :—Report on the Gaussian Constants for the Year 1829 ;—Second Sup- plementary Report on the Extinct Birds of the Mascarene Islands ;—Report of the Committee for Superintending the Monthly Reports of the Progress of Chemistry ;— Report of the Committee on the best means of providing for a Uniformity of Weights and Measures ;—Eighth Report on Kent’s Cavern ;—Report on promoting the Foundation of Zoological Stations in different parts of the World ;—Fourth Report on the Fauna of South Devon ;—Preliminary Report of the Committee appointed to Construct and Print Catalogues of Spectral Rays arranged upon a Scale of Wave- numbers ;—Third Report on Steam-Boiler Explosions ;—Report on Observations of Luminous Meteors, 1871-72 ;—Experiments on the Surface-friction experienced by a Plane moving through Water ;—Report of the Committee on the Antagonism be- tween the Action of Active Substances ;—Fifth Report on Underground Tempera- ture ;—-Preliminary Report of the Committee on Siemens’s Electrical-Resistance Pyrometer :—Fourth Report on the Treatment and Utilization of Sewage ;—Interim Report of the Committee on Instruments for Measuring the Speed of Ships and Currents ;—Report on the Rainfall of the British Isles ;—Report of the Committee on a Geographical Exploration of the Country of Moab;—Sur l’élimination des Fonctions Arbitraires ;—Report on the Discovery of Fossils in certain remote parts of the North-western Highlands ;—Report of the Committee on Earthquakes in Scotland ;—Fourth Report on Carboniferous-Limestone Corals ;—Report of the Com- mittee to consider the mode in which new Inventions and Claims for Reward in respect of adopted Inventions are examined and dealt with by the different Depart- ments of Government ;—Report of the Committee for discussing Observations of Lunar Objects suspected of change ;—Report on the Mollusca of Europe ;— Report of the Committee for investigating the Chemical Constitution and Optical Properties of Essential Oils ; Report on the practicability of establishing a “Close Time ” for the preservation of Indigenous Animals ;—Sixth Report on the Structure and Classi- fication of Fossil Crustacea ;— Report of the Committee appointed to organize an Ex- pedition for observing the Solar Eclipse of Dec. 12, 1871 ;—Preliminary Report of a Committee on Terato-embryological Inquiries ;—Report on Recent Progress in Elliptic and Hyperelliptic Functions ;—Report on Tidal Observations ;—On the Brighton Waterworks ;—On Amsler’s Planimeter. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, Dr. Carpenter’s Address, and Recommendations of the Association and its Committees. 750 _ PROCEEDINGS or tne FORTY-THIRD MEETING, at Bradford, September 1873, Published at £1 5s. ConTENTS :—Report of the Committee on Mathematical Tables ;—Observations on the Application of Machinery to the Cutting of Coal in Mines ;—Concluding Re- port on the Maltese Fossil Elephants ;—Report of the Committee for ascertaining the Existence in different parts of the United Kingdom of any Erratic Blocks or Boulders ;—Fourth Report on Earthquakes in Scotland ;—Ninth Report on Kent’s Cavern ;—On the Flint and Chert Implements found in Kent’s Cavern ;—Report of the Committee for Investigating the Chemical Constitution and Optical Properties of Essential Oils ;—Report of Inquiry into the Method of making Gold-assays ; —Fifth Report on the Selection and Nomenclature of Dynamical and Electrical Units ;—Report of the Committee on the Labyrinthodonts of the Coal-measures ;— Report of the Committee appointed to construct and print Catalogues of Spectral Rays ;—Report of the Committee appointed to explore the Settle Caves;—Sixth Report on Underground Temperature ;—Report on the Rainfall of the British Isles ;—Seventh Report on Researches in Fossil Crustacea ;—Report on Recent Progress in Elliptic and Hyperelliptic Functions ;—Report on the desirability of establishing a “ Close Time ”’ for the preservation of Indigenous Animals ;—Report on Luminous Meteors ; - -On the Visibility of the Dark Side of Venus ;—Report of the Committee for the Foundation of Zoological Stations in different parts of the World ;—Second Report of the Committee for collecting Fossils from North-western Scotland ;—Fifth Report on the Treatment and Utilization of Sewage ;—Report of the Committee on Monthly Reports of the Progress of Chemistry ;—On the Bradford Waterworks ;—Report on the possibility of Improving the Methods of Instruction in Elementary Geometry ; Interim Report of the Committee on Instruments for Measuring the Speed of Ships, &c.;—Report of the Committee for Determinating High Temperatures by means of the Refrangibility of Light evolved by Fluid or Solid Substances ;—On a periodicity of Cyclones and Rainfall in connexion with Sun-spot Periodicity ;—Fifth Report on the Structure of Carboniferous-Limestone Corals ;—Report of the Com- mittee on preparing and publishing brief forms of Instructions for Travellers, Ethnologists, &c. ;—Preliminary Note from the Committee on the Influence of Forests on the Rainfall ;—Report of the Sub-Wealden Exploration Committee ;—Report of the Committee on Machinery for obtaining a Record of the Roughness of the Sea and Measurement of Waves near shore ;—Report on Science Lectures and Organi- zation ;—Second Report on Science Lectures and Organization. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, Prof. A. W. Williamson’s Address, and Recommendations of the Association and its Committees. PROCEEDINGS or tae FORTY-FOURTH MEETING, at Belfast, August 1874, Published at £1 5s. : ConTENTS :—Tenth Report om Kent’s Cavern ;—Report for investigating the Chemical Constitution and Optical Properties of Essential Oils ;—Second Report of the Sub-Wealden Exploration Committee ;—On the Recent Progress and Present State of Systematic Botany ;—Report of the Committee for investigating the Nature of Intestinal Secretion ;—Report of the Committee on the Teaching of Physics in Schools ;—Preliminary Report for investigating Isomeric Cresols and their Deriva- tives ;—Third Report of the Committee for collecting Fossils from localities in North-western Scotland ;—Report on the Rainfall of the British Isles ;—On the Bel- fast Harbour ;—Report of Inquiry into the Method of making Gold-assays ;—Report of a Committee on Experiments to determine the Thermal Conductivities of certain Rocks ;—Second Report on the Exploration of the Settle Caves ;—On the Industrial uses of the Upper Bann River ;—Report of the Committee on the Structure and Classification of the Labyrinthodont ;—Second Report of the Committee for record- ing the position, height above the sea, lithological characters, size, and origin of the Erratic Blocks of England and Wales, &c. ;—Sixth Report on the Treatment and Utilization of Sewage ;—Report on the Anthropological Notes and Queries for the use of Travellers ;—On Cyclone and Rainfall Periodicities ;—Fifth Report on Earth- quakes in Scotland ;—Report of the Committee appointed to prepare and print Tables of Wave-numbers ;—Report of the Committee for testing the new Pyrometer of Mr. Siemens ;—Report to the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty on Experi- ments for the Determination of the Frictional Resistance of Water on a Surface, 751 &e. ;—Second Report for the Selection and Nomenclature of Dynamical and Elec- trical Units ;—On Instruments for measuring the Speed of Ships ;—Report of the Committee on the possibility of establishing a ‘Close Time” for the Protection of Indigenous Animals ;—Report of the Committee to inquire into the economic effects of Combinations of Labourers and Capitalists ;—Preliminary Report on Dredging on the Coasts of Durham and North Yorkshire ;—Report on Luminous Meteors ;—Re- port on the best means of providing for a Uniformity of Weights and Measures. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, Prof. John Tyndall's Address, and Recommendations of the Association and its Committees. PROCEEDINGS or tun FORTY-FIFTH MEETING, at Bristol, August 1875, Published at £1 5s. CONTENTS :—Eleventh Report on Kent’s Cavern ;—Seventh Report on Under- ground Temperature ;—Report on the Zoological Station at Naples ;—Report of a Committee appointed to inquire into the Methods employed in the Estimation of Potash and Phosphoric Acid in Commercial Products ;—Report on the present state of our Knowledge of the Crustacea ;—Second Report on the Thermal Conduc- tivities of certain Rocks ;—Preliminary Report of the Committee for extending the Observations on the Specific Volumes of Liquids ;—Sixth Report on Earthquakes in Scotland ;—Seventh Report on the Treatment and Utilization of Sewage ;—Re- port of the Committee for furthering the Palestine Explorations ;—Third Report of the Committee for recording the position, height above the sea, lithological characters, size, and origin of the Erratic Blocks of England and Wales, &c.;— Report of the Rainfall Committee ;—Report of the Committee for investigating Isomeric Cresols and their Derivatives ;—Report of the Committee for investigating the Circulation of the Underground Waters in the New Red Sandstone and Permian Formations of England ;—On the Steering of Screw-Steamers ;—Second Report of the Committee on Combinations of Capital and Labour ;—Report on the Method of making Gold-assays ;—Eighth Report on Underground Temperature ;—Tides in thé River Mersey ;—Sixth Report of the Committee on the Structure of .Carboniferous Corals ;—Report of the Committee appointed to explore the Settle Caves ;—On the River Avon (Bristol), its Drainage-Area, &c.;—Report of the Committee on the possibility of establishing a “Close Time” for the Protection of Indigenous Animals ;—Report of the Committee appointed to superintend the Publication of the Monthly Reports of the Progress of Chemistry ;—Report on Dredging off the Coasts of Durham and North Yorkshire in 1874 ;—Report on Luminous Meteors ;—On the Analytical Forms called Trees ;—Report of the Committee on Mathematical ‘Tables ;—Report of the Committee on Mathematical Notation and Printing ;—Second Report of the Committee for investigating Intestinal Secretion ;—Third Report of the Sub-Wealden Exploration Committee. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, Sir John Hawkshaw’s Address, and Recommendations of the Association and its Gommittees. PROCEEDINGS or tor FORTY-SIXTH MEETING, at Glasgow, September 1876, Published at £1 5s. CONTENTS :—Twelfth Report on Kent’s Cavern ;—Report. on Improving the Methods of Instruction in Elementary Geometry ;—Results of a Comparison of the British-Association Units of Electrical Resistance ;—Third Report on the Thermal Conductivities of certain Rocks ;—Report of the Committee on the practicability of adopting a Common Measure of Value in the Assessment of Direct Taxation i Report of the Committee for testing experimentally Ohm’s Law ;—Report of the Committee on the possibility of establishing a “Close Time ” for the Protection of Indigenous Animals ;—Report of the Committee on the Effect of Propellers on the Steering of Vessels ;—On the Investigation of the Stecring Qualities of Ships ;— Seventh Report on Earthquakes in Scotland ;—Report on the present state of our Knowledge of the Crustacea ;—Second Report of the Committee for investigating’ the Circulation of the Underground Waters in the New Red Sandstone and Permian - Formations of England ;—Fourth Report of the Committee on the Erratic Blocks of England and Wales, &c.;—Fourth Report of the Committee on the Exploration of the Settle Caves (Victoria Cave) ;—Report on Observations of Luminous Meteors, 752 1875-76 ;—Report on the Rainfall of the British Isles, 1875-76;—Ninth Report on Underground Temperature ;—Nitrous Oxide in the Gaseous and Liquid States ;— Eighth Report on the Treatment and Utilization of Sewage ;—Improved Investiga- tions on the Flow of Water through Orifices, with Objections to the modes of treat- ment commonly adopted ;—Report of the Anthropometric Committee ;—On Cyclone and Rainfall Periodicities in connexion with the Sun-spot Periodicity ;—Report of the Committee for determining the Mechanical Equivalent of Heat ;—Report of the Committee on Tidal Observations ;—Third Report of the Committee on the Condi- tions of Intestinal Secretion and Movement ;—Report of the Committee for collect- ing and suggesting subjects for Chemical Research. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, Dr. T, Andrews’s Address, and Recommendations of the Association and its Committees. PROCEEDINGS or tue FORTY-SEVENTH MEETING, at Ply- mouth, August 1877, Published at £1 4s. ConrENTS :—Thirteenth Report on Kent’s Cavern ;—Second and Third Reports on the Methods employed in the estimation of Potash and Phosphoric Acid in Com- mercial Products ;—Report on the present state of our Knowledge of the Crustacea (Part III.) ;—Third Report on the Circulation of the Underground Waters in the New Red Sandstone and Permian Formations of England ;—Fifth Report on the Erratic Blocks of England, Wales, and Ireland ;—Fourth Report on the Thermal Conducti- vities of certain Rocks ;—Report on Observations of Luminous Meteors, 1876-77 ;— Tenth Report on Underground Temperature ;—Report on the Effect of Propellers on the Steering of Vessels ;—Report on the possibility of establishing a “ Close Time i for the Protection of Indigenous Animals ;--Report on some Double Compounds of Nickel and Cobalt ;—Fifth Report on the Exploration of the Settle Caves (Victoria Cave);—Report on the Datum Level of the Ordnance Survey of Great Britain ;— Report on the Zoological Station at Naples ;—Report of the Anthropometric Com- mittee ;—Report on the Conditions under which Liquid Carbonic Acid exists in Rocks and Minerals. Together with the Transactions of the Sections, Prof. Allen Thomson’s Address, and Recommendations of the Association and its Committees. BRITISH ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE LIS. OF OFFICERS, COUNCIL, AND MEMBERS CORRECTED TO DECEMBER 1878 OFFICERS AND COUNCIL, 1878-79. PRESIDENT. WILLIAM SPOTTISWOODE, Esq., M.A., D.C.L., LL.D,, Pres. R.8.,' F.R.A.S., F.R.G.S. VICE-PRESIDENTS. The Right Hon. the Lorp Mayor or DUBLIN. The Right Hon. the EArt or Rosss, B.A., D,C.L. The Provost or TRINITY CoLLEGE, DUBLIN. F.R.S., F.R.A.S., M.R.LA. His Grace the DUKE oF ABERCORN, K.G. The Right Hon. LorD O’HaGan, M.R.I1.A. The Right Hon. the EARL oF ENNISKILLEN, D.C.L.,| Professor G. G. STOKES, M. i D.C.L., LL.D., F.R.S., F.G.S., M.R.LA. Sec. B.S. PRESIDENT ELECT. PROFESSOR G. J, ALLMAN, M.D., F.R.S. L. & E., F.L.S., M.R.IA. VICE-PRESIDENTS ELECT. His Grace the DuKE oF DrvonsHIRE, K.G., M.A.,| The Master CUTLER. LL.D., F.R.S., F.R.G.S. Professor T. H. Huxury, Ph.D., LL.D., Sec, R.S., The Right Hon, the Earu FitzwitwiaM, K.G., F.L.S., F.G.S. F.R.G.S. Professor W, ODLING, M.B., F.R.S., F.C.S. The Right Hon, the EARL OF WHARNCLIFFE,F.R.G.S. LOCAL SECRETARIES FOR THE MEETING AT SHEFFIELD. H. Cuirron Sorsy, Esq., F.R.S., F.G.S. J. F, Moss, Esq. LOCAL TREASURER FOR THE MEETING AT SHEFFIELD. HENRY STEPHENSON, Esq, ORDINARY MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL. ABEL, F, A., Esq., C.B., F.R.S. B.S. LEFEVRE, GEORGE SHAW, Esq., M.P. ADAMS, Professor W. G., F.R.S, MASKELYNE, Professor N. S., F.R.S. BARLOW, W. H., Esq., F.R.S. NEWTON, Professor A., F.R.S. BRAMWELL, F. a , Esq., C.E., F.R,S, OMMANNEY, Admiral Sir E., C.B., F.R.S, CAYLEY, Professor, F.R.S . PENGELLY, W., Esq., F.R.S. Evans, Captain, G.B., F.R.S, PRESTWICH, Professor J., F.R.S. Evans, J., Esq., F.R.S. RAYLEIGH, Lord, F.R.S. Farr, Dr. W., F.R.S. ROLLESTON, Professor G., F.R.S. FosrEr, Professor G. C., F.R.S. ROscor, Professor H. E., "ER S. FROUDE, W., Esq., F.R.S. RUSSELL, Dr. W. J., F. R. Ss. GLAISHER, J. W. TE ., Esq., F.R.S. SANDERSON, Prof. J. 8. BuRD DON, F.R.S. Hxywoop, J., Esq., F.R.S. SMYTH, WARINGTON W., Esq., F.R.S. HuaeGiss, W. ) Esq. », F.R.S, GENERAL SECRETARIES. Capt. DoueLas GALTON, C.B., D.C.L., F.R.S., F.G.S., 12 Chester Street, Grosvenor Place, London, 8.W. Pune LUTLEY ScLATER, Esq., M.A., Ph. D., FR. S., FL. Sey 20 Hanover Square, London, W. ASSISTANT SECRETARY. J. E. H. GorDoNn, Esq., B.A. GENERAL TREASURER. Professor A. W. WILLIAMSON, Ph.D., F.R.S., F.C.S., University College, London, W.C. EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL. The Trustees, the President and President Elect, the Presidents of former years, the Vice-Presidents and Vice-Presidents Elect, the General Secretaries for the present and former years, the late Assistant General Secretary, the General Treasurers for the present and former years, and the Local Treasurer and Secretaries for the ensuing Meeting. TRUSTEES (PERMANENT). General Sir EDWARD Sabine, K.C.B., R.A., D.C.L., F.R.S. Sir PHILIP DE M, GREY EGERTON, Bart., M. P., F.R.S., F.G.S. Sir JoHNn LUBBOCK, Bart., M.P., FR. S., oa L. 8. PRESIDENTS OF FORMER YEARS. The Duke of Devonshire. Richard Owen, M.D., D.C.L. Prof. Sir Wm. Thomson, D.C.L, The Rey. T. R. Robinson, D.D. Sir W. G. Armstrong, C.B., LL.D.| Dr. Carpenter, C.B., FR. s. Sir G. B. Airy, Astronomer Royal, | Sir William R, Grove, F.R.S. Prof, Williamson, Ph.D., F.R.S. General Sir EK. Sabine, K.C.B. The Duke of Buccleuch, K.G. Prof. Tyndall, D. C. L., FR. Ss. The Earl of Harrowby. Sir Joseph D. Hooker, D.C.L. Sir John Hawkshaw, OE. F.B.S The Duke of Argyll. Professor Stokes, M.A., D.C.L. Prof. T. Andrews, M.D., F.R.S. The Rey. H. Lloyd, D.D. Prof. Huxley, LL.D., Sec. R.S. Prof, Allen Thomson, F.R.S. GENERAL OFFICERS OF FORMER YEARS. . F, Galton, Esq., F.R.S, Gen, Sir E. Sabine, K.C.B., F.R.S. | Dr. Michael Foster, F.R.S. Dr. T, A. Hirst, F.R.S. W. Spottiswoode, Esq., F.R.S. George Griffith, Esq., M.A. AUDITORS. Warren De La Rue, Esq., F.R.S. | Professor W. H. Flower, F.R.S. | Professor G. C. Foster, F.R.S. iiSe, a 4 wrt ih rk Ani a"! Tree are ero 7 + se bela *% oF sire it, Gh) So ea =a? ‘ Tabi? mt. tall 14 : Hi LIST OF MEMBERS OF THE BRITISH ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE. 1878. * indicates Life Members entitled to the Annual Report. § indicates Annual Subscribers entitled to the Annual Report. §§ indicates Annual Subscribers who will be entitled to the Report if their Subscriptions are paid by December 31, 1878. t indicates Subscribers not entitled to the Annual Report. Names without any mark before them are Life Members not entitled to the Annual Report. Names of Members of the GENERAL COMMITTEE are printed in SMALL CAPITALS. Names of Members whose addresses are incomplete or not known are in italics. Notice of changes of Residence should be sent to the Assistant Secretary, 22 Albemarle Street, London, W. Year of Election. Abbatt, Richard, F.R.A.S. Marlborough House, Burgess Hill Sussex. 1866. tAbbott, George J., United States Consul, ey and Nottingham. 1863. *ABEL, FREDERICK Aveustvs, C.B., E.RBS., F.C.8., Director of the Chemical Establishment of the War Department, Royal Arsenal Woolwich. 1856. {Abercrombie, John, M.D. 18 Suffolk-square, Cheltenham. 1863. *Abernethy, James. 4 Delahay-street, Westminster, London, S.W. 1875. tAbernethy, James. Ferry-hill, Aberdeen. 1860. tAbernethy, Robert. Ferry-hill, Aberdeen. 1873. *Anney, Captain W. de W., R.E., F.R.S., F.R.A.S., F.C.S. 3 St. Alban’s-road, Kensington, London, W. 1854. Abraham, John. "97 Bold-street, Liverpool. 1877.§§Ace, Rey. Daniel, D.D. Laughton, near Gainsborough, Lincolnshire. 1873. ‘aaa tee Samuel, Greayes-street, Little Horton, Bradford, York- shire. 1869. tAcland, Charles T. D. Sprydoncote, Exeter. 1877. “Acland, Francis E. Dyke, R.A. Oxford. 1873. *Acland, Rey. H. D. Loughton, Essex. ACLAND, Henry W. D., M.A., M.D., LL.D., F-.R.S., E.R.G.S., Radcliffe Librarian and Regius Professor of Medicine in the University of Oxford. Broad-street, Oxford. 1877. ‘mrs aie Dyke, M.A. 13 Vincent-square, Westminster, x J 1860, tActanD, Sir Toomwas Dyxz, Bart., M.A., D.C.L., M.P. Phe cote, Exeter ; and Atheneum Club, "London, S.W. B 2 LIST OF MEMBERS. Year of Election. Adair, John. 13 Merrion-square North, Dublin. 1872, {Apams, A. Lurru, M.A., M.B., F.R.S., F.G.S., Professor of Zoology, Royal College of Science for Ireland. 18 Clarendon-gardens, Maida Hill, W.; and Junior United Service Club, Charles- street, St. James’s, London, 8.W. 1876. tAdams, James. 9 Royal-crescent West, Glasgow. *Apams, Joun Coucn, M.A., LL.D., FR. Se PE R.A. Shy Director of the Observatory and Lowndsean Professor of Astronomy and Geometry in the University of Cambridge. ‘The Observatory, Cambridge. 1871.§§Adams, John R. 3 College-cardens, Dulwich, Surrey, 8.E. 1877.§§Apams, WILLIAM. 3 Sussex-terrace, Plymouth. 1869, *Apams, WittiAM Grvtts, M.A., F.R.S., F.G.S., F.C.P.8., Professor of Natural Philosophy and Astronomy in King’s College, London. 43 Notting Hill-square, London, W. 1875. {Adams-Acton, John. Margutta House, 103 Marylebone-road, London, N.W. ADDERLEY, The Right Hon. Sir Cuartus Bowynr, M.P. Hams- hall, Coleshill, Warwickshire. Adelaide, The Right Rey. Augustus Short, D.D., Bishop of. South Australia. 1860. *Adie, Patrick. Grove Cottage, Barnes, London, S. W. 1865, *Adkins, Henry. Ley Hill, Oakfield, near Birmingh 1am. 1864, *Ainsworth, David. ‘The Flosh, Cleator, Carnforth. 1871. * Ainsworth, John Stirling. The Flosh, Cleator, Carnforth. Ainsworth, Peter. Smithills Hall, Bolton. 1842. *Ainsworth, Thomas. The Flosh, Cleator, Carnforth. 1871. {Ainsworth, William M. The Flosh, Cleator, Carnforth. 1859. tArrir, The Right Hon. the Earl of, K.T. Holly Lodge, Campden Hill, London, W.; and Airlie Castle, Forfarshire. Arry, Sir Grorcr Brppett, K.C.B., M.A., LL.D., D.C.L., E.R.S., F.R.A.S., Astronomer Royal. The Royal Observatory, Green- wich, 8.E. 1871. §Aitken, John. Darroch, Falkirk, N.B. Akvoyd, Edward. Banlkfield, Halifax. 1862. tAtcocx, Sir Rurnerrorp, K.C.B., D.C.L., F.R.G.S. The Athe- neum Olub, Pall M. all, London, S.W. 1861. {Alcock, Thomas, "M. D. Side Brook, Salemoor, Manchester. 1872. *Alcock, Thomas, M.D. Oakfield, Ashton-on-Mersey, Manchester. *Aldam, William. Frickley Hall, near Doncaster. ALpERSON, Sir JAwEs, M.A., M. Ds; D.C.L., F.R.S., Consulting Phy- sician to St. Mary’s Hospital. 17 Berkeley -square, London, W. 1859, {ArExanDER, General Sir James Epwarp, K.C.B., K.C.L.S., F.R.S.E., FLR.A.S., F.R.G.S. Westerton, Bridge of Allan, N. B. 1873. tAlexander, Reginald, MD. 13 Hallfield-road, Bradford, Yorkshire. 1858. {ALEXANDER, Wit AM, M.D. Halifax. 1850. {Alexander, Rey. William Lindsay, D.D.,F.R.S.E. Pinkieburn, Mus- selburgh, by Edinburgh. 1867. {Alison, George L.C. Dundee. 1859. {Allan, Alexander. Scottish Central Railway, Perth. 1871. fAllan, G., C.E. 17 Leadenhall-street, London, H.C. 1871. §ALLEN, ALFRED, H., F.C.S. 1 Surr ey-street, Sheffield. 1878. §Allen, John Romilly. 5 Albert-terrace, Regent’s Park, London, N, W. 1861, tAllen, Richard. Didsbury, near Manchester. Allen, William. 50. Henry-street, Dublin. 1852, *ALLEN, Witt1am J. C., Secretary to the Royal Belfast Academical Institution, Ulster Bank, Belfast. Year of oor LIST OF MEMBERS, Election. 1863. 1875. 1873. 1876. 1878. 1850. 1850. 1874. 1876. 1859. 1875. 1870. 1857. 1877. 1859, 1878. 1868. 1870, 1855, 1874, 1851, 1865. 1861. 1867. 1873. 1878, 1874, 1857. 1871. 1870. 1853. tAllhusen, ©. Elswick Hall, Newcastle-on-Tyne. *ALLMAN, Guorer J., M.D., F.R.S. L. & i, M.R.LA., F.L.S., Emeri- tus Professor of Natural History in the University of Edinburgh, (PRestpENnt Erect.) Queen Anne’s Mansions, St. James's Park, London, 8.W.; and Parkstone, Dorset. *Atston, Epwarp R., F.LS., F.Z.8. 224 Dorset-street, Portman- square, London, W. tAmbler, John. North Park-road, Bradford, Yorkshire. * {Anderson, Alexander. 1 St. James’s-place, Hillhead, Glascow,. §Anderson, Beresford. Saint Ville, Killiney, fAnderson, Charles William. Cleadon, South Shields. {Anderson, John. 31 St. Bernard’s-crescent, Edinburgh. {Anderson, John, J.P., F.G.S. Holywood, Belfast. {Anderson, Matthew. 137 St. Vincent-street, Glasgow. {AnpeRson, Parrick. 15 King-street, Dundee. fAnderson, Captain 8., R.E. Junior United Service Club, Charles- street, St. James's, London, S.W. {Anderson, Thomas Darnley. West Dingle, Liverpool. *“AypReEws, Tuomas, M.D., LL.D., F.R.S., Hon. F.R.S.E., M.R.LA., F.C.S., Vice-President and Professor of Chemistry, Queen’s College, Belfast, Queen’s College, Belfast. tAndrews, William. The Hill, Monkstown, Co. Dublin. §Angell, John. 81 Ducie-grove, Oxford-street, Manchester, tAngus, Jodhn. Town House, Aberdeen. §Anson, Frederick H. 9 Delahay-street, Westminster, S.W. *Awnstep, Davip THomas, M.A., F.R.S., F.G.S., F.R.G.S. 1 Prince’s- street, Storey’s-gate, Westminster, S.W.; and Melton, Suffolk. Anthony, John, M.D. 6 Greenfield-crescent, Edgbaston, Birmine- ham, Apsoun, James, M.D., F.RS., F.GS.,, M.R.LA., Professor of Mineralogy at Dublin University. South Hill, Blackrock, Co. Dublin. fAppleby, C.J. Emerson-street, Bankside, Southwark, London, 8.E. fArcher, Francis, jun. 8 Brunswick-street, Liverpool. *ARCHER, Professor Tuomas C., F.R.S.E., Director of the Museum of Science and Art, Edinburgh. West N ewington House, Edin- burch. fArcher, William, F.R.S., MR.LA. St. Brendan’s, Grosvenor-road East, Rathmines, Dublin. {ARG@yL, His Grace the Duke of, K.T.,D.C.L., F.R.S. L. &E., F.G.S. _ Argyll Lodge, Kensington, London, W.; and Inverary, Areyle- ‘shire, tArmitage, J. W., M.D. 9 Huntriss-row, Scarborough. tArmitage, William. 7 Meal-street, Mosley-street, Manchester. *Armitstead, George. Errol Park, Errol, N.B. ; §Armstrong, Henry E., Ph.D., F.R.S., F.C.8. London Institution, Finsbury-circus, London, E.C. tArmstrong, James. 284 Renfield-street, Glasgow. fArmstrong, James T., F.C.S; Plym Villa, Clifton-road, Tuebrook, Liverpool. Armstrong, Thomas. Higher Broughton, Manchester. *Armstrone, Sir WILLIAM Groner, O.B., LL.D., D.C.L., F.R.S. 8 Great George-street, London, S.W.; and Jesmond Dene, Neweastle-upon-Tyne. {Arnot, William, F.C.S. St. Margaret’s, Kirkintilloch, N.B. {Arnott, Thomas Reid. Bramshill, Harlesden Green, London, N. W. “Arthur, Rey. William, M.A, Clapham Common, London, 8.W. B2 4 LIST OF MEMBERS. Year of Election. 1870. *Ash, Dr. T. Linnington. Holsworthy, North Devon. 1874. {Ashe, Isaac, M.B. District Asylum, Londonderry. 1873. §Ashton, John, Gorse Bank House, Windsor-road, Oldham. 1842. *Ashton, Thomas, M.D. 8 Royal Wells-terrace, Cheltenham. : Ashton, Thomas. Ford Bank, Didsbury, Manchester. 1866, {Ashwell, Henry. Mount-street, New Basford, Nottingham. *Ashworth, Edmund, Egerton Hall, Bolton-le-Moors. Ashworth, Henry. Turton, near Bolton. 1861. {Aspland, Alfred. Dukinfield, Ashton-under-Lyne. 1875. *Aspland, W. Gaskell. IKilrea, Co. Derry, Iveland. 1861. §Asquith, J. R. Infirmary-street, Leeds. 1861. tAston, Thomas. 4 Elm-court, Temple, London, E.C. 1872. §Atchison, Arthur T., M.A. 60 Warwick-road, Earl’s Court, London,,. S.W. 1875. {Atchison, D. G. Tyersall Hall, Yorkshire. 1858. {Atherton, Charles. Sandover, Isle of Wight. 1866. {Atherton, J. H., F.C.S. Long-row, Nottingham. 1865. {Atkin, Alfred. Griffin’s Hill, Birmingham. 1861. {Atkin, Eli. Newton Heath, Manchester. 1865. *ArKinson, Epmunp, Ph.D., F.C.S. Portesbery Hill, Camberley, Surrey. 1863. *Atkinson, & Clayton. 21 Windsor-terrace, Newcastle-on-Tyne. 1861. Atkinson, Rey. J. A. Longsight Rectory, near Manchester. 1858. *Atkinson, John Hastings. 12 East Parade, Leeds. 1842. *Atkinson, Joseph Beavington. Stratford House, 113 Abingdon-road, Kensington, London, W. 1858. Atkinson, William. Claremont, Southport. 1863. *Arrrintp, Professor J., Ph.D., F.C.S. 17 Bloomsbury-square, London, W.C. 1860. *Austin-Gourlay, Rey. William E.C., M.A. The Rectory, Stanton St. John, near Oxford. 1865. *Avery, Thomas. Church-road, Edgbaston, Birmingham. 1867. tAvison, Thomas, F.8.A. Fulwood Park, Liverpool. é 1878. *Aylmer, Sir Gerald George, Bart. Donadea Castle, Kilcock, Co.. Kildare. 1877. *Ayrton, Professor W. E. The Imperial College of Engineering, Tokio, Japan. (Care of Mrs. J. C. Chaplin, 98 Palace-gardens- terrace, Kensington, London, W.) 1853, *Ayrton, W.S., F.S.A. Cliffden, Saltburn-by-the-Sea. *Basineton, CHARLES CarpAts, M.A.,, F.R.S., F.L.S., F.G.S., Pro- fessor of Botany in the University of Cambridge. 5 Brookside, Cambridge. Backhouse, Edmund. Darlington. Backhouse, Thomas James. Sunderland. 1863. {Backhouse, T. W. West Hendon House, Sunderland. 1877.§§Badock, W. F. Badminton House, Clifton Park, Bristol. 1870.§§Bailey, Dr. F. J. 51 Groye-street, Liverpool. 1878. §Bailey, John. 3 Blackhall-place,, Dublin. 1865. {Bailey, Samuel, F.G.S. The Peck, Walsall. 1855. {Bailey, William. Horseley Fields Chemical Works, Wolverhampton. 1866, {Baillon, Andrew. St. Mary’s Gate, Nottingham. 1866. {Baillon, L. St. Mary’s Gate, Nottingham. 1878. §Baily, Walter. 176 Haverstock-hill, London, N.W. 1857, {Barty, Witt1Am Heuer, F.LS., F.G.S., Acting Paleontologist to- the Geological Survey of Ireland. 14 Hume-street; and Apsley Lodge, 92 Rathgar-road, Dublin, Year of LIST OF MEMBERS. 5 Election. 1878. 1865, 1858. 1858. 1866, 1865. 1861. 1865, 1849, 1863.5 1875. 1875. 1871, 1871, 1875, 1878. 1866. 1863. 1878. 1876. 1870. 1869. 1874, 18652, 1870. 1861, 1866. 1861, 1859. 1855. 1871. 1852. 1860. 1876. 1868, 1863. §Bain, James. 3 Park-terrace, Glasgow. t{Baty, Rey. W. J. Glenlark Villa, Leamington. *Bainbridge, Robert Walton. Middleton House, Middleton-in-Tees- dale, by Darlington. : *Barnzs, Epwarp. Belgrave Mansions, Grosyenor-gardens, London, S.W.; and St. Ann’s Hill, Burley, Leeds, {Baines, Frederick. Burley, near Leeds. {Baines, T. Blackburn. ‘Mercury’ Office, Leeds. {Baker, Francis B. Sherwood-street, Nottingham, {Baker, James P. Wolverhampton. *Baker, John. Gatley Hill, Cheadle, Manchester. {Baker, Robert L. Barham House, Leamington. *Baker, William. 63 Gloucester-place, Hyde Park, London, W. §Baker, William. 6 Taptonville, Sheffield. *Baker, W. Mills. Moorland House, Stoke Bishop, near Bristol. {Baxer, W. Procror. Brislington, Bristol. *BaLrour, Francis Marrzanp, M.A., F.R.S. Trinity College, Cam- bridge. {Balfour,G. W. Whittinghame, Prestonkirk, Scotland. §Balfour, Isaac Bayley, D.Sc. 27 Inverleith-row, Edinburgh. *Batrour, JoHN Hurron, M.D., M.A., F.R.S. L. & E., F.L.S., Pro- fessor of Botany in the University of Edinburgh. 27 Inyerleith- row, Edinburgh. *Ball, Charles Bent, M.D. Blaenavon, Monmouthshire. *Bat, Joun, M.A., F.R.S., F.L.S., M.R.LA. 10 Southwell-gardens, South Kensington, London, 8. W. *Batt, Ropert Srawect, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S., F.R.A.S., Andrews Professor of Astronomy in the University of Dublin, and Royal Astronomer. The Observatory, Dunsink, Co, Dublin. {Ball, Thomas. Bramcote, Nottingham. §Batt, VALENTINE, F.G.S. . Calcutta. *Ball, William. Bruce-grove, Tottenham, London; and Glen Rothay, near Ambleside, Westmoreland. tBallantyne, James. Southcroft, Rutherglen, Glasgow. {Balmain, William H., F.C.S. Spring Cottage, Great St. Helen’s, Lancashire. {Bamber, Henry K., F.C.S. 5 Westminster-chambers, Victoria-street, Westminster, 8. W. *Bangay, Frederick.Arthur. Cheadle, Cheshire. tBangor, Viscount. Castleward, Co. Down, Ireland. {Banisrer, Rev. Witt1aM, B.A. St. James’s Mount, Liverpool. {tBannermann, James Alexander. Limefield House, Higher Broughton, near Manchester. tBarber, John. Long-row, Nottingham. *Barbour, George. Bankhead, Broxton, Chester. {Barbour, George F. 11 George-square, Edinburgh. *Barbour, Robert. Bolesworth Castle, Tattenhall, Chester. {Barclay, Andrew. Kilmarnock, Scotland. Barclay, Charles, F.S.A. Bury Hill, Dorking. tBarclay, George. 17 Coates-crescent, Edinburgh. Barclay, James. Catrine, Ayrshire. *Barclay, J. Gurney. 54 Lombard-street, London, E.C. *Barclay, Robert. High Leigh, Hoddesden, Herts. *Barclay, Robert. 21 Park-terrace, Glasgow. “Barclay, W. L. 54 Lombard-street, London, E.C. “Barford, James Gale, F.C.S. Wellington College, Wokingham, Berkshire. 6 LIST OF MEMBERS. Year of Election. 1860. *Barker, Rev. Arthur Alcock, B.D. Hast Bridgford Rectory, Nottingham. 1857. {Barker, John, M.D., Curator of the Royal College of os of Ireland. 83 Waterloo-road, Dublin. 1865. {Barker, Stephen. 30 Frederick-street, Edgbaston, Binninglem, 1870. {Barxty, Sir Heyry, K.C.B., F.R.S., F.R.G.S. 25 Queen’s-gate- terrace, London, Seyi 1873. {Barlow, Crawford, B.A. 2 Old Palace-yard, Westminster, 8. W. Barlow, Lieut.-Col. Maurice (14th Regt. of Foot). 5 Great George- street, Dublin. Barlow, Peter. 10 Lower Mount-street, Dublin. 1857. {Bartow, Perrr WixtiiaM, F.R.S., F.G.8. 26 Great George-street, Westminster, 8. W. 1873. §Bartow, W. H., C.E., F.R.S. 2 Old Palace-yard, Westminster, 8 .W. 1861. *Barnard, Major R. Cary, F.L.S. Bartlow, Leckhampton, Chelten- h am. 1868. §Barnes, Richard H. (Care of Messrs. Collyer, 4 Bedford-row, London, W.C. Barnes, Thomas Addison, 40 Chester-street, Wrevhan. *Barnett, Richard, M.R.C.S. 38 Heath-terrace, Worcester. 1859. {Barr, Lieut.-General. Apsleytoun, East Grinstead, Sussex. 1861. *Barr, William R., F.G.S. Fernside, Cheadle Hulme, Cheshire. 1860. {Barrett, iB: Hich-street, Wels pools Montgomery. 1872. *Barrerr, W. F., F ‘B.S.E., M.R.ILA., F.0.S., Professor of Physics in the Roy al College of Science, Dublin, 1874, {Barrington, R. "M. Ses, Ne Bray, Co. Wicklow. 1874, §Barrineton-W ard, Mark J., M.A., F.L.S., F.R.G.S8., H.M. Inspector of Schools. St. W inifred’s , Lincoln. 1866. {Barron, William. Elvaston Nurseries, Borrowash, Derby. 1858. {Barry, Rev. Canon, D.D., D.C.L., Principal of King’s College, London, W.C. 1862. *Barry, Charles. 15 Penile anare, Bayswater, London, W. 1875, {Barry, John Wolfe. 23 Delahay-street, W estminster, S.W. Barstow, Thomas. tae THill, near York. 1858. *Bartholomew, Charles. Castle Hill House, Ealing, Middlesex, W. 1855. tBartholomew, Hugh. New Gasworks, Glasgow. 1858. *Bartholomew, William Hamond. Ridgeway House, Cumberland-road, Headingley, Leeds. 1873. §Bartley, George C. T. National Penny Bank, 270 Oxford-street, London, W. 1868. *Barton, Edward (27th Inniskillens). Clonelly, Ireland. 1857. {Barton, Folloit W. Clonelly, Co. Fermanagh. 1852. {Barton, James. Farndreg, Dundall. 1864, {Bartrum, John 8S. 41 Gay-street, Bath. *Bashforth, Rey. Francis, B.D. Minting Vicarage, near Horn- castle, 1876.§§Bassano, Alexander. 12 Montagu-place, London, W. 1876.§§Bassano, Clement. Jesus College, Cambridge. 1866. *Bassnrt, Hunry. 44 St. Paul’ s-road, Camden-square, London, N.W 1866. {Bassett, Richard. Pelham-street, Nottingham. 1869. {Bastard, 8. S. Summerland-place, Exeter. 1871. {Basrray, H. Carron, M.D., M.A., F.B.S., F.L.S., Professor of Pathological Anatomy at Univer sity College. 20 Queen Anne- street, London, WE 1848. {Bars, C. SPENCE, FR. S., F.L.S. 8 Mulgrave-place, Plymouth. a Year of LIST OF MEMBERS, a Election, 1873. 1868. 1842. 1864, 1852. 1851. 1869, 1863. 1861. 1867. 1867. 1867. 1868. 1851. 1866. 1854. 1875. 1876, *Bateman, Daniel. Low Moor, near Bradford, Yorkshire. {Bateman, Frederick, M.D. Upper St. Giles’s-street, Norwich. Bateman, James, M.A., F.RS., F.R.GS., F.L.S. 9 Hyde Park- gate South, London, W. *BATEMAN, JOHN FrepeEric, C.E., F.R.S., F.G.S., F.R.G.S. 16 Great George-street, London, 8.W. }Bates, Henry Water, Assist.-Sec. R.G.S., F.L.S. 1 Savile-row, London, W. {Bateson, Sir Robert, Bart. Belvoir Park, Belfast. {Barn anp Wetts, The Right Rey. Lord Arrnur Hervey, Lord Bishop of. The Palace, Wells, Somerset. {Batten, John Winterbotham., 85 Palace-gardens-terrace, Kensing- ton, London, S.W. §BAUERMAN, H., F.G.S. 22 Acre-lane, Brixton, London, S.W. {Baxendell, Joseph, F.R.A.S. 108 Stock-street, Manchester. tBaxter, Edward. Hazel Hall, Dundee. {Baxter, John B. Craig Tay House, Dundee. {Baxter, The Right Hon. William Edward, M.P. Ashcliffe, Dundee. {Bayes, William, M.D. 58 Brook-street, London, W. eye, George. 16 London-street, Fenchurch-street, London, i. tBayley, Thomas. Lenton, Nottingham. tBaylis, C. O., M.D. 22 Devonshire-road, Claughton, Birkenhead. Bayly, John. Seven Trees, Plymouth. *Bayly, Robert. Torr-grove, near Plymouth. *Baynes, Robert E., M.A. Christ Church, Oxford. Bazley, Thomas Sebastian, M.A, Hatherop Castle, Fairford, Glou- cestershire. . *Brare, Lionet §., M.D., F.R.S., Professor of Pathological Anatom ) 8 y in King’s College. 61 Grosyenor-street, London, W. . {Beanes, Edward, F.C.S. The White House, North Dulwich, Surrey, ' S.E. . {Beard, Rev. Charles. 13 South-hill-road, Toxteth Park, Liver- pool. *Beatson, William. Chemical Works, Rotherham. - . *Beaufort, W. Morris, F.R.A.S., F.R.G.S., F.M.S., F.S.S. Atheneum Club, Pall Mall, London, S. W. . *Beaumont, Rev. Thomas George. Chelmondiston Rectory, Ips- ont, yo +P ich. Ww . *Beazley, Captain George G., F.R.G.S. Army and Navy Olub, Pall Mall, London, 8. W. . *Beck, Joseph, F.R.A.S. 31 Cornhill, London, E.C. . §Becker, Miss Lydia EK. Whalley Range, Manchester, . {Breckies, Samurt H., F.R.S., F.G.S. 9 Grand-parade, St. Leonard’s- on-Sea. . {Beddard, James. Derby-road, Nottingham. . §Brppor, Joun, M.D., F.R.S. Clifton, Bristol. . §Bedson, P. Phillips, D.Sc. Oak Leigh, Marple, near Stockport. . {Behrens, Jacob. Springfield House, North-parade, Bradford, York- shire. . *BrtAvenerZ, I., Captain of the Russian Imperial Navy, F.R.1GS., M.S.0.M.A., Superintendent of the Compass Observatory, Cronstadt. (Care of Messrs. Baring Brothers, Bishopsgate- street, London, E.0.) . {Belcher, Richard Boswell. Blockley, Worcestershire, . §Bell, A. P. Royal Exchange, Manchester, . §Bell, Charles B. Sprine-bank, Hull. 8 LIST OF MEMBERS. Year of Election. Bell, Frederick John.- Woodlands, near Maldon, Essex. 1859. tBell, George. Windsor-buildings, Dumbarton. 1860. {Bell, Rev. George Charles, M.A. Marborough College, Wilts. 1855. tBell, Capt. Henry. Chalfont Lodge, Cheltenham. 1862. *Brtt, Isaac Lowraran, M.P., F.R.S., F.0.S., M.LC.E. Rounton Grange, by Northallerton. 1875. §Bell, James, F.C.S. The Laboratory, Somerset House, London, W.C 1871. *Bell, J. Carter, F.C.S. Kersal Clough, Higher Broughton, Man- chester. 1853. {Bell, John Pearson, M.D. Waverley House, Hull. 1864. {Bell, R. Queen’s College, Kingston, Canada. 1876. §Bell, R. Bruce. 2 Olifton-place, Glasgow. Bett, Toomas, F.R.S., F.L.S., F.G.8. The Wakes, Selborne, near Alton, Hants. ‘1868. *Bell, Thomas. Crosby Court, Northallerton. 1867. {Bell, Thomas. Belmont, Dundee. 1875. {Bell, William. 36 Park-road, New Wandsworth, Surrey, S.W. 1842. Bellhouse, Edward Taylor. Eagle Foundry, Manchester. 1854. {Bellhouse, William Dawson. 1 Park-street, Leeds. Bellingham, Sir Alan. Castle Bellingham, Treland. 1866. *BrtpEr, The Right Hon. Lord, M.A., D.C.L., F.R.S., F.G.8S. 75 Eaton-square, London, S.W.; and Kingston Hall, Derby. 1864. *Bendyshe, T. 7 Belgrave-villas, Margate. 1870. {Bennerr, ALFRED W., M.A., B.Sc., F.L.S. 6 Park Village East, Regent's Park, London, N.W. 1871. {Bennett, F. J. 12 Hillmarten-road, Camden-road, London, N. 1870. *Bennett, William. 109 Shaw-street, Liverpool. 1870. *Bennett, William, jun. Oak Hill Park, Old Swan, near Liverpool. 1852. *Bennoch, Francis, F.S.A. 19 Tavistock-square, London, W.C. 1857. {Benson, Charles. 11 Fitzwilliam-square West, Dublin. Benson, Robert, jun. Fairfield, Manchester. 1848. {Benson, Starling, F.G.S. Gloucester-place, Swansea, 1870. {Benson, W. Alresford, Hants. 1863. tBenson, William. Fourstones Court, Newcastle-on-Tyne. 1848, {BentHaM, GxorcE, F.R.S., F.R.G.S., F.L.S. 25 Wilton-place, Knightsbridge, London, 8. W. 1842. Bentley, John. 2 Portland-place, London, W. 1863. §BrentiEy, Rosert, F.L.S., Professor of Botany in King’s College. 1 Trebovir-road, South Kensington, London, S.W. 1875. tBeor, Henry R. Scientific Club, Savile-row, London, W. 1876. {Bergius, Walter C. 9 Loudon-terrace, Hillhead, Glasgow. 1868. {BrrkeLey, Rey. M. J., M.A., F.L.S. Sibbertoft, Market Har- borough. 1863. {Berkley, C. Marley Hill, Gateshead, Durham. 1848. {Berrington, Arthur V. D. Woodlands Castle, near Swansea. 1866. sear sae eid Arthur George. Monyash Parsonage, Bakewell, Derby- shire. 1870. {Berwick, George, M.D. 36 Fawcett-street, Sunderland. 1862, {Besant, William Henry, M.A., F.R.S. St. John’s College, Cambridge. 1865. *BrssEMER, Henry. Denmark Hill, Camberwell, London, S.E. 1858. {Best, William. Leydon-terrace, Leeds. Bethune, Admiral, C.B., F.R.G.S. Balfour, Fifeshire. 1876. *Bettany, G. T., B.A., B.Sc. Caius College, Cambridge. 1859. {Beveridge, Robert, M.B. 36 King-street, Aberdeen. 1874. *Bevington, James B. Merle Wood, Sevenoaks. 1863. {Bewick, Thomas John, F.G.S. Haydon Bridge, Northumberland. a on LIST OF MEMBERS. 9 Year of Election. *Bickerdike, Rev. John, M.A. St. Mary’s Vicarage, Leeds. 1870. {Bickerton, A.W., F.C.S. Hartley Institution, Southampton. 1863. {Bigger, Benjamin. Gateshead, Durham, 1864, {Biggs, Robert. 16 Green Park, Bath. 1855, {Billings, Robert William. 4 St. Mary’s-road, Canonbury, London, N. Bilton, Rev. William, M.A., F.G.S. United University Club, Suffolk- street, London, S.W. 1877.§§ Binder, W. J., B.A. Barnsley. 1842. Bryygy, Epwarp Writ1am, F.C.S., F.G.S. Cheetham Hill, Man- chester. 1873. {Binns, J. Arthur. Manningham, Bradford, Yorkshire. Birchall, Edwin, F.L.8. Douglas, Isle of Man. Birchall, Henry. College House, Bradford. 1866. *Birkin, Richard. Aspley Hall, near Nottingham. *Birks, Rev. Thomas Rawson, M.A., Professor of Moral Philosophy in the University of Cambridge. 7 Brookside, Cambridge. 1841. *Brrt, Wirrram Rapcrirr, F.R.A.S. Hawkenbury, Palmerston- road, Buckhurst Hill. 1871. *Briscnor, Gustav. 4 Hart-street, Bloomsbury, London, W.C. 1868. {Bishop, John. Thorpe Hamlet, Norwich. 1866. {Bishop, Thomas. Bramcote, Nottingham. 1877 Le yee oe The Right Hon. Lord, K.C.M.G. Cornwood, Ivy- ridge. 1869. {Blackall, Thomas. 13 Southernhay, Exeter. 1834, Blackburn, Bewicke. 14 Victoria-road, Kensington, London, W. 1876. {Blackburn, Hugh, M.A., Professor of Mathematics in the University of Glasgow. Blackburne, Rey. John, M.A. Yarmouth, Isle of Wight. Blackburne, Rev. John, jun., M.A. Rectory, Horton, near Chip-_ enham. 1877.§§Blackie, J. Alexander. 17 Stanhope-street, Glasgow. 1859. {Blackie, John Stewart, M.A., Professor of Greek in the University of Edinburgh. ; 1876. {Blackie, Robert. 7 Great Western-terrace, Glasgow. 1855, *Bracktz, W. G., Ph.D., F.R.G.S._ 17 Stanhope-street, Glasgow. 1870, {Blackmore, W. Founder’s-court, Lothbury, London, E.C. *BLACKWALL, Rev. Jonny, F.L.S. Hendre House, near Llanrwst, Denbighshire. 1878. §Blair, Matthew. Oakshaw, Paisley. 1868. {Blake, C. Carter, D.Sc. Westminster Hospital School of Medi- cine, Broad Sanctuary, Westminster, S.W. 1849, *Braxn, Henry Wottaston, M.A., F.R.S., F.R.G.S. 8 Devonshire place, Portland-place, London, W. 1846, *Blake, William. Bridge House, South Petherton, Somerset. 1878. §Blakeney, Rey. Canon, M.A. The Vicarage, Sheffield. 1845. {Blakesley, Rev. J. W., B.D. Ware Vicarage, Hertfordshire. 1861. §Blakiston, Matthew, F.R.G.S. 18 Wilton-crescent, London, S.W. Blakiston, Peyton, M.D., F.R.S. 140 Harley-street, London, W. 1868. {Blanc, Henry, M.D. 9 Bedford-street, Bedford-square, London, W.C. 1869. {Blanford, W. T., F.R.S., F.G.S., F.R.G.S., Geological Survey of India. Calcutta. *BLOMEFIELD, Rey. Leonarp, M.A., F.L.S., F.G.S. 19 Belmont, Bath. 1878. § Blood, T. Lloyd. Blore, Edward, LL.D., F.R.S., F.R.G.S., F.S.A. 4 Manchester- square, London, W, 1870. {Blundell, Thomas Weld. Ince Blundell Hall, Great Crosby, Lan- cashire. 10 LIST OF MEMBERS. Year of Election. 1859. {Blunt, Sir Charles, Bart. Heathfield Park, Sussex. 1859. {Blunt, Capt. Richard. Bretlands, Chertsey, Surrey. Blyth, B. Hall. 135 George-street, Edinburgh. 1858. *Blythe, William. Holland Bank, Church, near Accrington. 1870. {Boardman, Edward. Queen-street, Norwich. 1866, §Bogg, Thomas Wemyss. 2 East Ascent, St. Leonard’s. 1876 §Bogue, David. 192 Piccadilly, London, W. 1859. *Bonn, Heyry G., F.L.S., F.R.A.S., F.R.G.S., F.S.S. North End House, Twickenham. 1871. {Bohn, Mrs. North End House, Twickenham, 1859. {Bolster, Rev. Prebendary John A. Cork. 1876. {Bolton, J.C. Carbrook, Stirling. Bolton, R. L. Laurel Mount, Aigburth-road, Liverpool. 1866. {Bond, Banks. Low Pavement, Nottingham. Bond, Henry John Hayes, M.D. Cambridge. 1871. §Bonney, Rev. Thomas George, M.A., F.R.S., F.S.A., F.G.S. St. John’s College, Cambridge. 1866. {Booker, W. H. Cromwell-terrace, Nottingham. 1861. §Booth, James. Elmfield, Rochdale. 1861. *Booth, William. Hollybank, Cornbrook, Manchester. 1876.§§Booth, William II. Trinity College, Oxford. 1861. *Borchardt, Louis, M.D. Barton Arcade, Manchester. 1849, {Boreham, William W., F.R.A.S. The Mount, Haverhill, New- market. 1876. *Borland, William. 260 West George-street, Glasgow. 1865. {Borries, Theodore. Lovaine-crescent, Newcastle-on-Tyne. 1876. *Bosanquet, R. H. M., M.A., F.C.S., F.R.S.A. St. John’s College, Oxford. *Bossey, Francis, M.D. Mayfield, Oxford-road, Redhill, Surrey. 1867. §Botly, William, F.S.A. Salisbury House, Hamlet-road, Upper Norwood, London, 8.E. 1858. {Botterill, John. Burley, near Leeds. 1872. {Bottle, Alexander. Dover. 1868. {Bottle, J.T. 28 Nelson-road, Great Yarmouth, 1871. *Borrominy, James Tomson, M.A.,, F.R.S.E., F.C.S. The Univer- sity, Glasgow. Bottomley, William. 14 Brunswick-gardens, Kensington, London, W. 1876. §Bottomley, William, jun. 14 Brunswick-gardens, Kensington, London, W. 1850. {Bouch, Thomas, C.E. Oxford-terrace, Edinburgh. 1870. tBoult, Swinton. 1 Dale-street, Liverpool. 1868. {Boulton, W.S. Norwich. 1866, §Bourne, Stephen, F.S.8. Abberley, Wallington, Surrey. 1872, {Bovill, William Edward. 29 James-street, Buckingham-gate, London, 8.W. 1870. {Bower, Anthony. Bowersdale, Seaforth, Liverpool. 1867. {Bower, Dr. John. Perth. 1856. *Bowlby, Miss F. E. 20 Lansdowne-parade, Cheltenham. 1863. {Bowman, R. Benson. Newcastle-on-Tyne. Bowman, William, F.R.S., F.R.C.S. 5 Clifford-street, London, W. 1869. {Bowring, Charles T. Elmsleigh, Prince’s-park, Liverpool. 1865. {Bowron, James. South Stockton-on-Tees. ( 1863. §Boyd, Edward Fenwick. Moor House, near Durham. 1871. Boyd, Thomas J. 41 Moray-place, Edinburgh. 1865. {Boyrn, Rev. G. D. Soho House, Handsworth, Birmingham, LIST OF MEMBERS. 11 Year of Election. 1872. *Brasroox, BE. W., F.S.A., Dir. A.I. 28 Abingdon-street, West- minster, 8, W. 1869. *Braby, Frederick, F.G.S., F.C.S. Mount Henley, Sydenham Hill, London, S.E. 1870.§§Brace, Edmund. 3 Spring-gardens, Kelvinside, Glasgow. Bracebridge, Charles Holt, F.R.G. S. The Hall, Atherstone, War- wickshire. 1861. *Bradshaw, William. Slade House, Green-walk, Bowdon, Cheshire. 1842, *Brapy, Sir Anronro, J.P., F.G.S. Maryland Point, Stratford, Essex, E. 1857. *Brady, Cheyne, M.R.I.A. Trinity Vicarage, West Bromwich. Brady, Daniel F., M.D. 5 Gardiner’s-row, Dublin. 1863. {Brapy, Grorcr S. 22 Faweett-street, Sunderland. 1862. §Brapy, Henry Bowman, F.R.S., F.L.S., F.G.S. Hillfield, Gates- head. 1875. {Bragee, William, F'.S.A., F.G.S. Shirle Hill, Sheffield. 1864. §Braham, Philip, FOS. 6 George-street, Bath. 1870. §Braidwood, Dr. Delemere-terrace, Birkenhead. 1864. §Braikenridge, Rev. George Weare, M.A., F.L.S. Clevedon, Somerset. 1865. §BRAMWELL, Frepericx J., M.LC.E., F.R.S. 37 Great George- street, London, S.W. 1872. {Bramwell, William J. 17 Prince Albert-street, Brighton. 1867. {Brand, William. Milnefield, Dundee. 1861. *Brandreth, Rev. Henry. Dickleburgh Rectory, Scole, Norfolk. 1852. {Brazrer, Jamss 8., F.C.S., Professor of Chemistry in Marischal Col- lege and University of Aberdeen. 1857. {Brazill, Thomas. 12 Holles-street, Dublin. 1869, *BREADALBANE, The Right Hon. the Earl of. Taymouth Castle, N.B.; and Carlton Club, Pall Mall, London, 8. W. 1873. {Breffit, Edgar. Castleford, near Normanton. 1868. {Bremridge, Elias. 17 Bloomsbury-square, London, W.C. 1877.§§ Brent, Francis. 19 Clarendon-place, Plymouth. 1860. tBrett, G. Salford. 1866. {Brettell, Thomas (Mine Agent). Dudley. 1875. §Briant, T. Hampton Wick, Kingston-on-Thames. 1867. {Brineman, WitLram Kenortny. 69 St. Giles’s-street, Norwich. 1870. *Bridson, Joseph R. Belle Isle, Windermere. 1870. {Brierley, Joseph, C.E. New Market-street, Blackburn. 1870. *Brice, Joun. Broomfield, Keighley, Yorkshire. 1866. *Briggs, Arthur. Crage Royd, Rawdon, near Leeds. 1866.§§Briges, Joseph. Barrow-in-Furness. 1863. *Bricut, Sir Cuartes Tuston, C.E., F.G.S., F.R.G.S., F.R.A.S. 20 Bolton-gardens, London, S.W. 1870. {Bright, H. A., M.A., F.R.G.S. Ashfield, Knotty Ash. Brieut, The Right Hon. J onn, M.P. Rochdale, Lancashire. 1868, {Brive, Commander Laxpnsay. Army and Navy Club, Pall Mall, London, 8.W. 1878. §Britten, James, F.L.S. Department of Botany, British Museum, London, W.C. 1842. Broadbent, Thomas. Marsden-square, Manchester. 1859. *Bropuvrst, Bernard Epwarp. 20 Grosyenor-street, Grosvenor-- square, London, W. 1847. {Broprm, Sir Bensammn C., Bart., M.A., D.C.L., F.R.S., F.C.S. Brockham Warren, Reigate. 1834. {Bropin, Rev. Jams, F. GS. Monimail, Fifeshire. 1865. {Bropre, Rey. Prrrr Burraneer, M.A., F.G.S, Rowington Vicar- age, near Warwick. 12 LIST OF MEMBERS, Year of Election. 4853. {Bromby, J.H., M.A. The Charter House, Hull. 1878. §Brook, George. Huddersfield, Yorkshire. *Brookr, Cuartes, M.A., F.R.S., F.R.C.S. 16 Fitzroy-square, London, W. 1855. {Brooke, Edward. Marsden House, Stockport, Cheshire. 1864, *Brooke, Rey. J. Ingham. Thornhill Rectory, Dewsbury. 1855. {Brooke, Peter William. Marsden House, Stockport, Cheshire. 1878. §Brooke, Sir Victor, Bart., F.L.S. Colebrook, Brookeborough, Co. Fermanagh. 1863. §Brooks, John Crosse. Wallsend, Newcastle-on-Tyne. 1846. *Brooks, Thomas. Cranshaw Hall, Rawtenstall, Manchester. Brooks, William. Ordfall Hill, East Retford, Nottinghamshire. 1874.§§Broom, William. 20 Woodlands-terrace, Glascow. 1847, {Broome, C. Edward, F.L.S. Elmhurst, Batheaston, near Bath. *Broun, Joun Arran, F.R.S. 9 Abercorn-place, St. John’s Wood, London, N.W. ; 1863. *Brown, ALEXANDER Crum, M.D., F.R.S.E., F.C.S., Professor of Chemistry in the University of Edinburgh. 8 Belgrave-crescent, Kdinburgh. 1867. {Brown, Charles Gage, M.D. 88 Sloane-street, London, S.W. 1855, {Brown, Colin. 192 Hope-street, Glasgow. ) 1871. §Brown, David. 93 Abbey-hill, Edinburgh. 1863, *Brown, Rev. Dixon. Unthank Hall, Haltwhistle, Carlisle. 1870. §Brown, Horace T. The Bank, Burton-on-Trent. Brown, Hugh. Broadstone, Ayrshire. 1870. *Brown, J. Camppett, D.Sc., F.O.S. Royal Infirmary School of Medicine, Liverpool. 1876. §Brown, John. Edenderry House, Belfast. 1859. {Brown, Rev. John Crombie, LL.D., F.L.S. Berwick-on-Tweed. 1874. {Brown, John 8. Edenderry, Shaw’s Bridge, Belfast. 1863. {Brown, Ralph. Lambton’s Bank, Newcastle-on-Tyne. 1871. {Brown, Ropert, M.A., Ph.D., F.L.S., F.R.G.8. 26 Guildford- road, Albert-square, London, 8. W. 1868. {Brown, Samuel. Grafton House, Swindon, Wilts. *Brown, Thomas. Evesham Lawn, Pittville, Cheltenham. *Brown, William. 11 Maiden-terrace, Dartmouth Park, London, N. 1855. {Brown, William. 33 Berkeley-terrace, Glasgow. 1850, {Brown, William, F.R.S.E. 25 Dublin-street, Edinburgh. 1865. {Brown, William. 414 New-street, Birmingham. 1866. *Browne, Rey. J. H. Lowdham Vicarage, Nottingham. 1862. *Browne, Robert Clayton, jun., B.A. Browne’s Hill, Carlow, Ire- land. 1872. {Browne, R. Mackley, F.G.S. Northside, St. John’s, Sevenoaks, Kent. 1875. {Browne, Walter R. Bridgwater. 1865. *Browne, William, M.D. The Friary, Lichfield. 1865. {Browning, John, F.R.A.S. 111 Minories, London. E. 1855.§§Brownlee, James, jun. 380 Burnbank-gardens, Glasgow. 1853. {Brownlow, William B. Villa-place, Hull. 1863. *Brunel, H. M. 23 Delahay-street, Westminster, S.W. 1863. {Brunel, J. 23 Delahay-street, Westminster, S.W. 1875. *Brunlees, James, C.K., F.G.S. 5 Victoria-street, Westminster, S.W. 1875. {Brunlees, John. 5 Victoria-street, Westminster, S.W. 1868. {Brunron, T. Lauper, M.D., F.R.S. 50 Welbeck-street, London, W. 1878. §Brutton, Joseph. Yeovil. LIST OF MEMBERS. 13: Year of Election. 1877.§§Bryant, George. 82 Claverton-street, Pimlico, London, S.W. 1875. {Bryant, G. Squier. 15 White Ladies’-road, Clifton, Bristol. 1875.§§ Bryant, Miss 8. A. The Castle, Denbigh. 1861, {Bryce, James. York-place, Higher Broughton, Manchester. Bryce, Rey. R. J., LL.D., Principal of Belfast Academy. Belfast. 1859. {Bryson, William Gillespie. Cullen, Aberdeen. 1867. {BucciEvcH AND QUEENSBERRY, His Grace the Duke of, K.G.,D.C.L., F.R.S, L. & E., F.L.S. Whiteball-gardens, London, 8. W. ; and Dalkeith House, Edinburgh. 1871. §BucHan, ALEXANDER, M.A., F.R.S.E., Sec. Scottish Meteorologieal Society. 72 Northumberland-street, Edinburgh. 1867. {Buchan, Thomas. Strawberry Bank, Dundee. BucHanan, ANDREW, M.D., Professor of the Institutes of Medicine: in the University of Glasgow. 4 Ethol-place, Glasgow. Buchanan, Archibald. Catrine, Ayrshire. Buchanan, D. C. Poulton-cum-Seacombe, Cheshire. 1871. {Buchanan, John Y. 10 Moray-place, Edinburgh. 1864. §Buckie, Rev. Grorcz, M.A. The Rectory, Weston-super- Mare. 1865. *Buckley, Henry. 27 Wheeley’s-road, Edgbaston, Birmingham. 1848, *BuckMan, Professor Jamus, F'.L.S., F.G.S. Bradford Abbas, Sher- borne, Dorsetshire. 1869. {Bucknill, J.C., M.D., F.R.S. 39 Wimpole-street, London, W. 1851. *Bucxton, GroreE Bownter, F.R.S., F.L.S., F.C.S. Weycombe,. Haslemere, Surrey. 1848. *Bupp, James Parmer. Ystalyfera Iron Works, Swansea. 1875. §Budgett, Samuel. Cotham House, Bristol. 1871. §Bulloch, Matthew. 11 Park-cireus, Glascow. 1845, *Bunsury, Sir Cuartes James Fox, Bart., F.R.S., F.LS., F.G.S., F.R.G.S. Barton Hall, Bury St. Edmunds. 1865. {Bunce, John Mackray. ‘ Journal’ Office, New-street, Birming- ham. 1863. §Bunning, T. Wood. Institute of Mining and Mechanical Engineers, Newcastle-on-Tyne. 1842, *Burd, John. 5 Gower-street, London, W.C. 1875. {Burder, John, M.D. 7 South-parade, Bristol. 1869, {Burdett-Coutts, Baroness. Stratton-street, Piccadilly, London, W. 1874. {Burdon, Henry, M.D. Clandeboye, Belfast. 1872. *Burgess, Herbert. 62 High-street, Battle, Sussex. 1876. {Burnet, John. 14 Victoria-crescent, Dowanhill, Glasgow. 1859. {Burnett, Newell. Belmont-street, Aberdeen. 1877.§§Burns, David, C.E. Alston, Carlisle. 1860. {Burrows, Montague, M.A., Professor of Modern History, Oxford. 1877.§§Burt, J. Kendall. Kendal. 1874. {Burt, Rev. J. T. Broadmoor, Berks. 1866. *Burtoy, Freperick M., F.G.S. Highfield, Gainsborough. 1864, {Bush, W. 7 Circus, Bath. Bushell, Christopher. Royal Assurance-buildings, Liverpool. 1855. *Busk, Grorcs, F.R.S., V.P.L.S., F.G.S, 52 Harley-street, Cayen-: dish-square, London, W. 1878. §BurcuER, J. G., M.A. 22 Collingham-place, London, 8.W. 1857. {Butt, Isaac, Q.C., M.P. 64 Eccles-street, Dublin. 1872. {Buxton, Charles Louis. Cromer, Norfolk. 1870. {Buxton, David, Principal of the Liverpool Deaf and Dumb Institution,. Oxford-street, Liverpool. 1868. {Buxton, 8. Gurney. Catton Hall, Norwich. 1872. {Buxton, Sir T. Fowell, Bart. Warlies, Waltham Abbey, Essex. 14 LIST OF MEMBERS. Year of Election. 1854, {Byrriery, Isaac, F.L.S. Seacombe, Liverpool. Byng, William Bateman. 2 Bank-street, [pswich. 1852. {Byrne, Very Rev. James. Ergenagh Rectory, Omagh. 1875. §Byrom, W. Ascroft, F.G.S. 27 King-street, Wigan. 1858. §Cail, John. Stokesley, Yorkshire. 1863. {Cail, Richard. Beaconsfield, Gateshead. 1858. *Cuine, Rev. William, M.A. Christ Church Rectory, Denton, near Manchester. 1876.§§Caird, Alexander M‘Neel. Genoch, Wigtownshire. 1863. {Caird, Edward. Finnart, Dumbartonshire. 1876.§§Caird, Edward B. 8 Scotland-street, Glasgow. 1861. *Caird, James Key. 8 Magdalene-road, Dundee. 1855. *Caird, James Tennant. Belleaire, Greenock. 1875. {Caldicott, Rev: J. W., D.D. The Grammar School, Bristol. 1877.§§Caldwell, Miss. 2 Victoria-terrace, Portobello, Edinburgh. 1868. {Caley, A. J. Norwich. 1868. {Caley, W. Norwich. 1857. {Callan, Rey. N. J., Professor of Natural Philosophy in Maynooth College. . 1853. tCalver, Captain E. K., R.N., F.R.S8. The Grange, Redhill, Surrey. 1876. {Cameron, Charles, M.D., LL.D., M.P. 1 Huntly-gardens, Glasgow. 1857. {Cammron, Cuartes A., M.D. 15 Pembroke-road, Dublin. 1870. {Cameron, John, M.D. 17 Rodney-street, Liverpool. 1857. Sig Dugald, F.C.S. 7 Quality-court, Chancery-lane, London, Wi; 1874, *Campsett, Sir Grores, K.C.8.1., M.P., D.C.L., F.R.G.S. 13 Corn- wall-cardens, South Kensington, London, 8.W.; and Eden- wood, Cupar, Fife. Campbell, Sir Hugh P. H., Bart. 10 Hill-street, Berkeley-square, London, W.; and Marchmont House, near Dunse, Berwick~ shire. *Campbell, Sir James, 129 Bath-street, Glasgow. 1876, {Campbell, James A. 5 Claremont-terrace, Glasgow. Campbell, John Archibald, M.D., F.R.S.E. Albyn-place, Edinburgh. 1872. {Camppett, Rey. J. R., D.D. 5 Eldon-place, Manningham-lane, Bradford, Yorkshire. 1859. {Campbell, William. Dunmore, Argyllshire. 1871. {Campbell, William Hunter, LL.D. Georgetown, Demerara, British Guiana. (Messrs. Ridgway & Sons, 2 Waterloo-place, London, S.W.) CamPBEtt-JoHNsTON, ALDXANDER Ropert, F.R.S. 84 St.George’s- square, London, 8. W. 1876. §Campion, Frank, F.G.S., F.R.G.S. The Mount, Duffield-road, Derby. 1862. *Camrron, Rey. Dr. Wrztram M. Queen’s College, Cambridge. 1868. *Cann, William. 9 Southernhay, Exeter. 1873. *Oarbutt, Edward Hamer, C.E. St. Ann’s, Burley, Leeds, Yorkshire, *Carew, William Henry Pole. Antony, Torpoint, Devonport. 1877.§§Carkeet, John, O.K. 3 St. Andrew’s-place, Plymouth. 1876,§§Carlile, Thomas. 5 St. James’s-terrace, Glasgow. CartistE, The Right Rev. Harvey Goopwr, D.D., Lord Bishop of. Carlisle. 1861. {Carlton, James. Mosley-street, Manchester. 1867. {Carmichael, David (Engineer). Dundee. 1867. {Carmichael, George. 11 Dudhope-terrace, Dundee. Carmichael, John T. C. Messrs. Todd § Co., Cork. 1876, tCarmichael, Neil, M.D. 22 South Cumberland-street, Glasgow. 77 LIST OF MEMBERS, 15 Year of Election. 1871. 1871. 1854. 1845. 1872. 1842, 1867. 1861. 1857, 1868. 1866. 1855. 1870, 1878. 1870. 1862. 1868. 1866, 1871 1878. . 1874. 1853. 1859, 1873. 1849, 1860. 1871. 1870. 1858. 1860. 1842, 1842, 1859, 1861, 1859, 1865, 1868, 1842, {Carpenter, Cartes. Brunswick-square, Brighton. *Carpenter, P. Herbert. Eton College, Windsor. {Carpenter, Rey. R. Lant, B.A. Bridport. {Carpgyter, WitiraM B., 0.B., M.D., LL.D., E.B.S., F.L.S., F.G.S., Registrar of the University of London. 56 Regent’s Park- road, London, N.W. §Carpenter, WittiaM Lanr, B.A., B.Sc., F.C.S. Winifred House, Pembroke-road, Clifton. Bristol. *Carr, William, M.D., F.L.S., F.R.C.S. Lee Grove, Blackheath, S.E §Carruruers, WititAM, F.R.S., F.L.S., F.G.S. British Museum, London, W.C. *Carson, Rev. Joseph, D.D., M.R.I.A. °18 Fitzwilliam-place, Dublin. {Carre, ALEXANDER, M.D. Royal Dublin Society, Dublin. {Carteighe, Michael, F.C.S. 172 New Bond-street, London, W. {Carter, H. H. The Park, Nottingham. {Carter, Richard, C.E., F.G.S. Cockerham Hall, Barnsley, Yorkshire. {Carter, Dr. William. 62 Elizabeth-street, Liverpool. *CarIMELL, Rev. Jamus, D.D., F.G.S., Master of Christ's College. Christ College Lodge, Cambridge. §Cartwright, H. 8. Magherafelt Manor, Co. Derry. §Cartwright, Joshua, A.I.C.B., Borough Surveyor. Bury, Lancashire. {Carulla, Facundo, F.A.S.L. Gare of Messrs. Daglish and Co., 8 Har- rington-street, Liverpool. {Cary, Joseph Henry. Newmarket-road, Norwich. {Casella, L. P., F.R.A.S, 147 Holborn Bars, London, E.C. {Cash, Joseph. Bird-grove, Coventry. “Cash, William. 38 Elmfield-terrace, Saville Park, Halifax. Castle, Charles. Clifton, Bristol. tCaton, Richard, M.D., Lecturer on Physiology at the Liverpool Medical School. 184 Abercromby-square, Liverpool. {Cator, John B., Commander R.N. 1 Adelaide-street, Hull. {Catto, Robert. 44 Kino-street, Aberdeen. *Cavendish, Lord Frederick, M.P, 21 Carlton House-terrace, London, S.W {Cawley, Charles Edward. The Heath, Kirsall, Manchester. §Caytey, Arrnur, LL.D., F.R.S,, V.P.R.A.S., Sadlerian Professor of Mathemathics in the University of Cambridge. Garden House, Cambridge. Cayley, Digby. Brompton, near Scarborough. Cayley, Kdward Stillingfleet. Wydale, Malton, Yorkshire, *Cecil, Lord Sackville. Hayes Common, Beckenham, Kent. tChadburn, C. H. Lord-street, Liverpool. *Chadwick, Charles, M.D, Lynncourt, Broadwater Down, Tunbridge Wells. {Cuavwick, Davip, M.P. The Poplars, Herne Hill, London, 8.1. CHapwick, Epwiy, C.B._ Richmond, Surrey. Chadwick, Elias, M.A, Pudleston Court, near Leominster, {Chadwick, Robert. Highbank, Manchester. {Chadwick, Thomas. Wilmslow Grange, Cheshire. *OHALLIS, Rev. Jaaus, M.A., F.R.S., F.R.A.S., Plumian Professor of Astronomy in the University of Cambridge. 2 Trumpington- street, Cambridge. tChalmers, John Inglis. Aldbar, Aberdeen. {OuamBeRLAIN, J. H. Christ Church-buildings, Birmingham, T Chamberlain, Robert. Catton, Norwich. Chambers, George, High Green, Sheffield, 16 LIST OF MEMBERS. Year of Election. 1868. . 1877. 1865. 1865. 1865. 1861. 1877. 1866. 1871. 1874. 1871. 1836. 1874. 1863. 1866. 1867. 1864. 1874. . §CurcuxsteR, The Right Hon. the Earl of, Stanmer House, Lewes. {Chambers, W. O. Lowestoft, Suffolk. eee ae tie Arthur, M.A., F.G.S. Dartington Hall, Totnes, evon. *Champney, Henry Nelson. 4 New-street, York. {Chance, A. M. Edgbaston, Birmingham. *Chance, James T. Four Oaks Park, Sutton Coldfield, Birmingham. §Chance, Robert Lucas. Chad Hill, Edgbaston, Birmingham. *Chapman, Edward, M.A., F.L.S., F.C.S. Frewen Iall, Oxford. §Chapman, T. Algernon. Burghill, Hereford. {Chapman, William. The Park, Nottingham. §Chappell, William, F.S.A. Strafford Lodge, Oatlands Park, Wey- bridge Station. {Charles, John James, M.A., M.D. 11 Fisherwick-place, Belfast. {Charles, T. C., M.D. Queen’s College, Belfast. CHARLESWORTH, Epwarb, F.G.S. 1184 Strand, London, W.C. {Charley, William. Seymour Hill, Dunmurry, Ireland. {Charlton, Edward, M.D. 7 Eldon-square, Newcastle-on-Tyne. {Cuarnock, Ricoarp SrepHen, Ph.D., F.S.A., F.R.G.S. Junior Garrick Club, Adelphi-terrace, London, W.C. Chatto, W. J. P. Union Club, Trafalgar-square, London, S.W. *Chatwood, Samuel. 5 Wentworth-place, Bolton. {Crmapiz, W.B., M.A., M.D., F.R.G.S. 2 Hyde Park-place, Cum- berland-gate, London, S.W. *Chermside, Lieutenant H.C., R.E. Care of Messrs. Cox & Co., Craig’s-court, Charing Cross, London, S.W. CuicuEstER, The Right Rev. Ricuarp Duryrorp, D.D., Lord Bishop of. Chichester. . *Child, Gilbert W., M.A., M.D., F.L.S. Lee Place, Charlbury, Oxon. . *Chiswell, Thomas. 17 Lincoln-grove, Plymouth-grove, Manchester. . {Cholmeley, Rev. C. H. Dinton Rectory, Salisbury. . {Christie, John, M.D. 46 School-hill, Aberdeen. . {Christie, Professor R. C., M.A. 7 St. James’s-square, Manchester. Curistison, Sir Ropert, Bart., M.D., D.C.L., F.R.S.E., Professor of Dietetics, Materia Medica, and Pharmacy in the University of Edinburgh. Edinburgh. : Sete? her, George, F.C.S. 8 Rectory-grove, Clapham, London, ; *CHRYSTAL, G., B.A., Professor of Mathematics. The University, St. Andrew’s, N.B. . §CuuRcH, A. H., F.C.S., Professor of Chemistry in the Royal Agri- cultural College, Cirencester. . tChurch, William Selby, M.A. St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, E.C . tChurchill, F., M.D. Ardtrea Rectory, Stewartstown, Co, Tyrone. . tClabburn, W. H. Thorpe, Norwich. . [Clapham, A. 3 Oxford-street, Newcastle-on-Tyne. . {Clapham, Henry. 5 Summerhill-grove, Newcastle-on-Tyne. . §CrapHam, Ropert Catvert. Earsdon House, Earsdon, Newcastle- on-Tyne. . §Clapp, Frederick. 44 Magdalen-street, Exeter. . tClarendon, Frederick Villiers. 1 Belvidere-place, Mountjoy-square, Dublin. . }Clark, David. Coupar Angus, Fifeshire. . {Clark, David P. Glasgow. . *Clark, F. J. 20 Bootham, York. Clark, G.T. Bombay; and Athenzeum Club, London, 8. W. LIST OF MEMBERS. 17 Year of Election. 1876. 1876. 1861. 1855, 1865. 1875. 1872. 1875. 1861. tClark, George W. Glasgow. tClark, Dr. John. 138 Bath-street, Glasgow. - sagen 5 Westminster-chambers, Victoria-street, London, SV: {Clark, Rey. William, M.A. Barrhead, near Glasgow. {Clarke, Rev. Charles. Charlotte-road, Edgbaston, Birmingham. tClarke, Charles S. 4 Worcester-terrace, Clifton, Bristol. Clarke, George. Mosley-street, Manchester. *CLARKE, Hypr. 32 St. George’s-square, Pimlico, London, S.W. tCiaRrkE, Joun Henry. 4 Worcester-terrace, Clifton, Bristol. *Clarke, John Hope. Lark Hill House, Edgeley, Stockport. 1877.§§Clarke, Professor John W. University of Chicago, Llinois. 1851. 1861. 1856. 1866. 1875. 1850. 1859. 1861. 1857. 1852. 1873. 1869. 1861. 1854. 1866. 1878. 1873. 1859. 1861. 1863. 1868. 1855. 1855. 1851. 1864. 1864. 1861. 1865, 1876, {CrarkE, Josnua, F.L.S. Fairycroft, Saffron Walden. Clarke, Thomas, M.A. Knedlington Manor, Howden, Yorkshire. {Clay, Charles, M.D. 101 Piccadilly, Manchester. *Clay, Joseph Travis, F.G.S. Rastrick, near Brighouse, Yorkshire. *Clay, Colonel William. The Slopes, Wallasea, Cheshire. tClayden, P. W. 13 Tavisteck-square, London, W.C. tClegram, T. W. B. Saul Lodge, near Stonehouse, Gloucester- shire. t{CiecHorn, Hveu, M.D., F.L.S., late Conservator of Forests, Madras. Stravithie, St. Andrews, Scotland. {Cleghorn, John. Wick. §CLELAND, Jonn, M.D., F.R.S., Professor of Anatomy in the Univer- sity of Glasgow. 2 College, Glasgow. tClements, Henry. Dromin, Listowel, Ireland. {Clerk, Rev. D. M. Deverill, Warminster, Wiltshire. tClibborn, Edward. Royal Irish Academy, Dublin. §Cliff, John, F.G.S. Halton, Runcorn. tCiirrorp, Witi1aM Krnepon, M.A., F.R.S., Professor of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics in University College, London. _ 26 Colville-road, Bayswater, London, W. *Cuirton, R. Beriamy, M.A., F.R.S., F.R.A.S., Professor of Experi- mental Philosophy in the University of Oxford. Portland Lodge, Park Town, Oxford. Clonbrock, Lord Robert. Clonbrock, Galway. {Close, The Very Rey. Francis, M.A. Carlisle. §Crosr, Toomas, F.S.A. St. James’s-street, Nottingham. §Close, Rev. Maxwell, F.G.S. 40 Lower Baggot-street, Dublin. tClough, John. Bracken Bank, Keighley, Yorkshire. tClouston, Rev. Charles. Sandwick, Orkney. *Clouston, Peter. 1 Park Terrace, Glasgow. *Clutterbuck, Thomas. Warkworth, Acklington. tCoaks, J. B. Thorpe, Norwich. *Coats, Sir Peter. Woodside, Paisley. *Coats, Thomas. Fergeslie House, Paisley. Cobb, Edward. 13 Great Bedford-street, Bath. *CopBoLp, JoHN CHEvALLIER. Holywells, Ipswich; and Atheneum Club, London, S.W. tCozpzotp, T. Spencer, M.D., F.R.S., F.L.S., Professor of Botany and Helminthology in the Royal Veterinary College, London. 74 Portsdown-road, Maida Hill, London, W. *Cochrane, James Henry. Monmouth House, Wellington-terrace, Clevedon, Somersetshire. *Coe, Rev. Charles C., F.R.G.S. Highfield, Manchester-road, Bolton. tCoghill, H. Newcastle-under-Lyme. tColbourn, E, Rushton. 5 Marchmont-terrace, Hillhead, Glasgow. Cc 18 LIST OF MEMBERS. Year of Flection. 1853. {Colchester, William, F.G.S. Springfield House, Ipswich. 1868. {Colchester, W. P. Bassingbourn, Royston. 1876. §Colebrooke, Sir T. E., Bart., M.P., F.R.G.S. 14 South-street, Park- lane, London, W.; and Abington House, Abington, N.B, 1860. {Coleman, J. J., F.C.S. 69 St. George’s-place, Glasgow. 1854. *Colfox, William, B.A. Westmead, Bridport, Dorsetshire. : 1878. §Coles, John, Curator of the Map Collection R.G.S. 1 Savile-row, London, W. 1857. {Colles, William, M.D. 21 Stephen’s-green, Dublin. 1869, {Collier, W. F. Woodtown, Horrabridge, South Devon. 1854. t{Conzinewoop, Curnprrtr, M.A., M.B., F.L.S. 4 Grove-terrace, Belvedere-road, Upper Norwood, Surrey, 8.E. 1861, *Collingwood, J. Frederick, F.G.S. Anthropological Institute, 4 St. Martin’s-place, Loncon, W.C. 1865. *Collins, James Tertius. Churchfield, Edgbaston, Birmingham. 1876. §Cotxins, J. H., F.G.S. 57 Lemon-street, Truro, Cornwall. 1876.§§Collins, William. 38 Park-terrace East, Glasgow. Collis, Stephen Edward. Listowel, Ireland. 1868. *Comman, J. J., M.P. Carrow House, Norwich; and 108 Cannon- street, London, E.C. 1870, {Coltart, Robert. The Hollies, Aigburth-road, Liverpool. Colthurst, John. Clifton, Bristol. 1874. t{Combe, James. Ormiston House, Belfast. *Compron, The Ven. Lord Atwrn. Castle Ashby, Northampton- shire; and 145 Piccadilly, London, W. 1846. *Compton, Lord William. 145 Piccadilly, London, W. 1852. {Connal, Michael. 16 Lynedock-terrace, Glasgow. 1871. *Connor, Charles C.. Hope House, College Park East, Belfast. 1876. {Cook, James. 162 North-street, Glasgow. 1876, *Cooxr, Conran W., C.E. 5 Nelson-terrace, Clapham Common, London, 5.W. 1863. {Cooxn, Epwarp, WittuM, R.A., F.R.S., F.R.G.S., F.L.S., F.G.S. Glen Andred, Groombridge, Sussex; and Athenzeum Club, Pall Mall, London, 8.W. 1868. {Cooke, Rev. George H. Wanstead Vicarage, near Norwich, Cooke, James R., M.A. 73 Blessington-street, Dublin. Cooke, J. B. Cayendish-road, Birkenhead. 1868. {Cooxn, M. C., M.A. 2 Grosvenor-villas, Upper Holloway, London, N. 1878. §Cooke, Samuel, M.A., F.G.S. Poona, Bombay. Cooke, Rev. T. L., M.A. Magdalen College, Oxford. Cooke, Sir William Fothergill. 31 Castle-street, Farnham, Surrey. 1859. *Cooke, William Henry, M.A., Q.C., F.S.A. 42 Wimpole-street, London, W.; and Rainthorpe Hall, Long Stratton. 1865. tCooksey, Joseph. West Bromwich, Birmingham. 1868, {Cookson, N. C. Benwell Tower, Newcastle-on-Tyne, 1869. §Cooling, Edwin, F.R.G.S. Mile Ash, Derby. 1850, tCoorrr, Sir Hunry, M.D. 7 Chavrlotte-street, Hull. Cooper, James. 58 Pembridge-villas, Bayswater, London, W. 1875. tCooper, T. T., F.R.G.S.. Care of Messrs. King & Co., Cornhill, London, E.C. 1868. {Cooper, W. J. The Old Palace, Richmond, Surrey. 1846. tCooper, William White, F.R.C.S. 19 Berkeley-square, London, W- 1878. §Cope, Rev. 8. W. Bramley, Leeds. 1871. tCopeland, Ralph, Ph.D. Parsonstown, Ireland. 1868, {Copeman, Edward, M.D. Upper King-street, Norwich, 1863. {Coppin, John, North Shields. LIST OF MEMBERS. 19 Year of Election. 1842. Corbett, Edward. Ravenoak, Cheadle-hulme, Cheshire, 1855, {Corbett, Joseph Henry, M.D., Professor of Anatomy and Physiology in Queen’s College, Cork. 1870. *Corrretp, W. H., M.A., M.B., F.G.S., Professor of Hygiéne and — Public Health in University College. 10 Bolton-row, Mayfair, London, W. Cory, Rev. Robert, B.D., F.C.P.S, Stanground, Peterborough, Cottam, George. 2 Winsley-street, London, 1857. (Cottam, Samuel. Brazennose-street, Manchester, 1855. {Cotterill, Rev. Henry, Bishop of Edinburgh. Edinburgh. 1874, *Cotterill, J. H., M.A., F.R.S., Professor of Applied Mechanics. Royal Naval College, Greenwich, S.E. 1864. {Corron, General Frepzrick C., R.E., C.S.1. 13 Longridge-road, : Earl’s Court-road, London, 8. W. 1869. tCorron, Wit11aM. Pennsylvania, Exeter. *Cotton, Rev. William Charles, M.A. Vicarage, Frodsham, Cheshire, 1876. {Couper, James. City Glass Works, Glasgow. 1876. {Couper, James, jun.’ City Glass Works, Glasgow. 1874.§§ Courtauld, John M. Bocking Bridge, Braintree, Essex. 1865. {Courtauld, Samuel, F.R.A.S. 76 Lancaster-gate, London, W.; and Gosfield Hall, Essex. 1834. {Cowan, Charles. 38 West Register-street, Edinburgh. 1876, {Cowan, J. B. 159 Bath-street, Glasgow. Cowan, John. Valleyfield, Pennycuick, Edinburgh. 1863. {Cowan, John A. Blaydon Burn, Durham. 1863. {Cowan, Joseph, jun. Blaydon, Durham. 1872. *Cowan, Thomas William. Hawthorn House, Horsham. 1873. *Cowans, John. Cranford, Middlesex. Cowie, The Very Rey. Benjamin Morgan, M.A., B.D., Dean of Man- chester. The Deanery, Manchester. 1871. t{Cowper, C. E. 3 Great George-street, Westminster, 8. W. 1860, {Cowper, Edward Alfred, M.I.C.E. 6 Great George-street, West- minster, S.W. . 1867. *Cox, Edward. 18 Windsor-street, Dundee. 1867. *Cox, George Addison. Beechwood, Dundee. 1867. {Cox, James. Clement Park, Lochee, Dundee. 1870. *Cox, James. 8 Fallmer-square, Liverpool. Cox, Robert. 25 Rutland-street, Edinburgh. 1867. *Cox, Thomas Hunter. Dunearse, Dundee. 1867. {Cox, William. Foggley, Lochee, by Dundee. 1866. *Cox, William H. 50 Newhall-street, Birmingham, 1871, {Cox, William J. 2 Vanburgh-place, Leith. Craig, J. T. Gibson, F.R.S.E. 24 York-place, Edinburgh. 1859. {Craig, 8. The Wallands, Lewes, Sussex. 1876. {Cramb, John. Larch Villa, Helensburgh, N.B. 1857, {Crampton, Rev. Josiah. The Rectory, Florence Court, Co. F ermanagh, Ireland. 1858. {Cranage, Edward, Ph.D. The Old Hall, Wellington, Shropshire, 1876, {Crawford, Chalmond, M.P. Ridemon, Crossear, 1871, *Crawford, William Caldwell, M.A. Eagle Foundry, Port Dundas, Glasgow. 1871. {Crawshaw, Edward. Burnley, Lancashire. 1870. *Crawshay, Mrs. Robert. Oyfarthfa Castle, Merthyr Tydvil. 1876, *Crewdson, Rev. George. St. George’s Vicarage, Kendal. Creyke, The Venerable Archdeacon. Bolton Perey Rectory, Tad- caster. 1858, }Crofts, John, Hillary-place, Leeds, c 2 20 LIST OF MEMBERS. Year of Election. 1878. 1859. 1857. 1866. 1870. 1865. 1855. 1870. 1870. 1870, 186]. 1868. 1867. 1853. 1870. 1871. 1866. 1861. 1863. 1860. 1859. §Croke, John O’Byrne. 1 Casino-terrace, Clontarf, Dublin. tCroll, A. A. 10 Coleman-street, London, E.C. {Crolly, Rev. George. Maynooth College, Ireland. t{Cronin, William. 4 Brunel-terrace, Nottingham. tCrookes, Joseph. Marlborough House, Brook Green, Hammersmith, London, W. §Crooxes, WILLIAM, F.R.S., F.C.S. 20 Mornington-road, Regent’s Park, London, N.W. t{Cropper, Rev. John. Wareham, Dorsetshire. {Crosfield, C. J. 16 Alexandra-drive, Prince’s Park, Liverpool. tCrosfield, William, sen. Annesley, Aigburth, Liverpool. *Crosfield, William, jun. 16 Alexandra-drive, Prince’s Park, Liver- ool. Cree Bey. John Edward, M.A. Appleby Vicarage, near Brigg. tCrosse, Thomas William. St. Giles’s-street, Norwich. §CrosskEy, Rev. H. W., F.G.S. 28 George-road, Edgbaston, Bir- mingham. tCrosskill, William, C.E. Beverley, Yorkshire. *Crossley, Edward, F.R.A.S. Bemerside, Halifax. tCrossley, Herbert. Broomfield, Halifax. *Crossley, Louis J., F.M.S. Moorside Observatory, near Halifax. §Crowley, Henry. Trafalgar-road, Birkdale Park, Southport. tCruddas, George. Elswick Engine Works, Newcastle-on-Tyne. {Cruickshank, John. City of Glasgow Bank, Aberdeen. {Cruickshank, Provost. Macduff, Aberdeen. 1873.§§Crust, Walter. Hall-street, Spalding. 1859 1874. 1876. 1861. 1861. 1877. 1852. 1869. 1855. 1850. 1866. 1867. 1857. 1878. 1834. 1863. 1854. 1863. 1853. 1865. 1867. 1870. 1859, 1859. Culley, Robert. Bank of Ireland, Dublin. tCumming, Sir A. P. Gordon, Bart. Altyre. t{Cumming, Professor. 33 Wellington-place, Belfast. {Cunlif, Richard S: Carlton House, Stirling. *Cunliffe, Edward Thomas. The Elms, Handforth, Manchester. *Cunliffe, Peter Gibson. The Elms, Handforth, Manchester. §Cunningham, D. J., M.D. University of Edinburgh. tCunningham, John. Macedon, near Belfast. {CunnineHam, Ropert O., M.D., F.L.S. Professor of Natural His- tory in Queen’s College, Belfast. {Cunningham, William A. 2 Broadwalk, Buxton. {Cunningham, Rey. William Bruce. Prestonpans, Scotland. ea John. 68 Oakley-square, Bedford New Town, London, *Cursetjee, Manockjee, F.R.G.S., Judge of Bombay. Villa-Byculla, Bombay. {Curtis, Professor ARTHUR Hitt, LL.D. Queen’s College, Galway. §Curtis, William. Caramore, Sutton. *Cuthbert, John Richmond. 40 Chapel-street, Liverpool. tDaglish, John. Hetton, Durham. {Daglish, Robert, C.E. Orrell Cottage, near Wigan. tDale, J.B. South Shields. tDale, Rev. P. Steele, M.A. Hollingfare, Warrington. {Dale, Rev. R. W. 12 Calthorpe-street, Birmingham. {Dalgleish, W. Dundee. {Dallinger, Rev. W. H. Great Crosby, Liverpool. Dalmahoy, James, F.R.S.E. 9 Forres-street, Edinburgh. {Dalrymple, Charles Elphinstone. West Hall, Aberdeenshire. {Dalrymple, Colonel. Troup, Scotland. Dalton, Edward, LL.D., F.S.A. Dunkirk House, Nailsworth. LIST OF MEMBERS. 2) Year of Election. *Dalton, Rev. J. E., B.D. Seagrave, Loughborough. Dalziel, John, M.D. Holm of Drumlanrig, Thornhill, Dumfriss- shire, 1862. {Dansy, T. W. Downing College, Cambridge. 1859. {Dancer, J. B., F.R.A.S. Old Manor House, Ardwick, Manchester, 1873. {Danehill, F. H. Vale Hall, Horwich, Bolton, Lancashire. 1876.§§Dansken, John. 4 Eldon-terrace, Partickhill, Glasgow. 1849. *Danson, Joseph, F.C.S. Montreal, Canada. 1861, *DarBisHire, Ropert DuxkinFrerp, B.A., F.G.S. 26 George-street, Manchester. 1876. {Darling, G. Erskine. 247 West George-street, Glasgow. Darwin, Cuartes R., M.A., F.R.S., F.L.S., F.G.S., Hon. F.R.S.E. and M.R.I.A. Down, near Bromley, Kent. 1878. §Darwin, Horace. Down, near Bromley, Kent. 1848. {DaSilva, Johnson. Burntwood, Wandsworth Common, London, S.W 1872. §Davenport, John T. 64 Marine Parade, Brighton. Davey, Richard, F.G.S. Redruth, Cornwall. 1870. {Davidson, Alexander, M.D. 8 Peel-street, Toxteth Park, Liverpool, 1859. {Davidson, Charles. Grove House, Auchmull, Aberdeen. 1871.§§Davidson, James. Newhattle, Dalkeith, N.B. 1859. {Davidson, Patrick. Inchmarlo, near Aberdeen. 1872. {Davinson, Tomas, F.R.S., F.G.S._ 3 Leopold-road, Brighton. 1875. {Davies, David. 2 Queen’s-square, Bristol. 1870. {Davies, Edward, F.C.S. Royal Institution, Liverpool. 1863. { Davies, Griffith. 17 Cloudesley-street, Islington, London, N. 1842, Davies-Colley, Dr. Thomas. Newton, near Chester. 1878. *Davis, Alfred. Sun Foundry, Leeds. 1870. *Davis, A.S. Mornington Villa, Leckhampton-road, Cheltenham, 1864, {Davis, CHartes E., F.S.A. 55 Pulteney-street, Bath. Davis, Rey. David, B.A. Lancaster. 1873. *Davis, James W. Chevinedge, near Halifax. 1856, *Davis, Sir Jonn Francis, Bart., K.C.B., F.R.S., F.R.G.S. Holly- wood, near Compton, Bristol. 1859. {Davis, J. Barnard, M.D., F.R.S., F.S.A. Shelton, Hanley, Staf- fordshire. 1859. *Davis, Richard, F.L.S. 9 St. Helen’s-place, London, E.C. 1873. {Davis, William Samuel. 1 Cambridge Villas, Derby. 1864, *Davison, Richard. Beverley-road, Great Driffield, Yorkshire. 1857. {Davy, ee W., M.D. Kimmage Lodge, Roundtown, near Dublin. 1869, {Daw, John. Mount Radford, Exeter. 1869. {Daw, R. M. Bedford-circus, Exeter. 1854, *Dawbarn, William. Elmswood, Aigburth, Liverpool. Dawes, John Samuel, F.G.S. Lappel Lodge, Quinton, near Bir- mingham, ' 1860. *Dawes, J ohn T., jun. Lianferris, Mold, North Wales. 1864, {Dawxins, W. Boyn, M.A., F.R.S., F.G.S., F.S.A. Birchview, Nor- man-road, Rusholme, Manchester. Dawson, John. Barley House, Exeter, 1855. TDawson, Joun W., M.A., LL.D., F.R.S., F.G.S., Principal of M‘Gill College, Montreal, Canada. 1859, Sie Captain William G. Plumstead Common-road, Kent, E 1871. {Day, Sz. Joun Vincenr, C.E., F.R.S.E. 166 Buchanan-street, Glasgow. 22 LIST OF MEMBERS. Year of Election. 1870, 1861. 1859, 1861, 1870, 1866. 1878, 1854, 1870. 1875. 1870. 1874, 1856, 1874, 1878. 1870. 1868, 1869. 1868, 1872. 1873. 1852. 1864, 1863. 1867, 1876. 1862. 1877. 1848, §Deacon, G. F., M.LC.E. Rock Ferry, Liverpool. t{Deacon, Henry. Appleton House, near Warrington. {Dean, David. Banchory, Aberdeen. tDean, Henry. Colne, Lancashire. *Deane, Rev. George, B.A., D.Sc., F.G.S. Spring Hill College, Moseley, near Birmingham. {Drsus, Herwricu, Ph.D., F.R.S., F.C.S., Lecturer on Chemistry at Guy’s Hospital, London, S.E. §Delany, Rev. William, St. Stanislaus College, Tullamore. *De La Run, Warren, M.A., D.C.L., Ph.D., F.RS., F.CS.,, F.R.A.S. 73 Portland-place, London, W. {De Meschin, Thomas, M.A., LL.D. 3 Middle Temple-lane, Temple, London, E.C. Denchar, John, Morningside, Edinburgh. tDenny, William. Seven Ship-yard, Dumbarton. Dent, William Yerbury. Royal Arsenal, Woolwich. *Denton, J. Bailey. 22 Whitehall-place, London, 8. W. §De Rance, Cuartes E., F.G.S. 28 Jermyn-street, London, S.W. *Dersy, The Right Hon. the Earl of, LL.D., F.R.S., F.R.G.S. 23 St. James’s-square, London, 8.W.; and Knowsley, near Liver- ool. *Teihiien, Walter, M.A., LL.M., F.G.S. Henleaze Park, Westbury- on-Trym, Bristol, §De Rinzy, James Harward. Khelat Survey, Sukkur, India, De Saumarez, Rev. Havilland, M.A. St. Peter's Rectory, North- ampton. t{Desmond, Dr. 44 Irvine-street, Edge Hill, Liverpool. {Dessé, Etheldred, M.B., F.R.C.S. 43 Kensington Gardens-square, Bayswater, London, W. Dr Tasiey, GrorcE, Lord, F.Z.8. Tabley House, Knutsford, Cheshire. {Drvon, The Right Hon. the Earl of, D.C.L. Powderham Castle, near Exeter. *Dnvonsnire, His Grace the Duke of, K.G., M.A., LL.D., F.R.S., F.G.S., F.R.G.S., Chancellor of the University of Cambridge. Devonshire House, Piccadilly, London, W.; and Chatsworth, Derbyshire. {Dewar, James, M.A., F.R.S., F.R.S.E., Fullerian Professor of Chemistry in the Royal Institution, London, and Jacksonian Professor of Natural Experimental Philosophy in the University of Cambridge. Brookside, Cambridge. tDewick, Rev. E.S. The College, Eastbourne, Sussex. *Dew-Smith, A. G. 7a Eaton-square, London, 8.W. {Dicxre, Grorcr, M.A., M.D., F.L.S., Professor of Botany in the University of Aberdeen. *Dickinson, F. H., F.G.S. Kineweston, Somerton, Taunton; and 121 St. George’s-square, London, 8. W. tDickinson, G. T. Claremont-place, Newcastle-on-Tyne. {Dicxson, ALEXANDER, M.D., Professor of Botany in the University of Glasgow. 11 Royal-circus, Edinburgh. {Dickson, Gavin Irving. 37 West George-street, Glasgow. *Dixe, Sir Casares WenrwortH, Bart., M.P., F.R.G.S. 76 Sloane-street, London, 8. W. § Dillon, James, C.E. 46 Morehampton-road, Dublin. {Diztwyy, Lewis Lirwetyn, M.P., F.L.S., F.G.S. Parkwerne, near Swansea. LIST OF MEMBERS, 23 Year of Election. 1872. §Dinzs, Grorer, Woodside, Hersham, Walton-on-Thames. 1869. {Dingle, Edward. 19 King-street, Tavistock. : 1859. “Dingle, Rey. J. Lanchester Vicarage, Durham. 1876. {Ditchfield, Arthur. 12 Taviton-street, Gordon-square, . London, W.C. 1868, {Dittmar, W. Andersonian University, Glasgow. 1874, *Dixon, A. E. Dunowen, Cliftonville, Belfast. 1858. {Dixon, Edward, M.LC.E. Wilton House, Southampton. 1861. {Drxon, W. Hepworru, F.S.A., F.R.G.8. 6 St. James’s-terrace, Regent’s Park, London, N.W. *Dobbin, Leonard, M.R.I.A. 27 Gardiner’s-place, Dublin. 1851. {Dobbin, Orlando T., LL.D., M.R.LA. Ballivor, Kells, Co. Meath. 1860. *Dobbs, Archibald Edward, M.A. 34 Westbourne Park, London, W. 1878. *Doxsoy, G. E., M.A., M.B.,F.L.S. Royal Victoria Hospital, Netley, Southampton. 1864, “Dobson, William. Oakwood, Bathwick Hill, Bath. 1875. *Doewra, George, jun. Grosvenor-road, Handsworth, Birmingham, 1870. *Dodd, John. 6 Thomas-street, Liverpool. 1876, tDodds, J. M. 15 Sandyford-place, Glasgow. “Dodsworth, Benjamin. Burton House, Scarborough, *Dodsworth, George. The Mount, York. Dolphin, John. Delves House, Berry Edge, near Gateshead. 1851. {Domvile, William C., F.Z.S. Thorn Hill, Bray, Dublin. 1867. {Don, John. The Lodge, Broughty Ferry, by Dundee. 1867. {Don, William G. St. Margaret’s, Broughty Ferry, by Dundee. 1873. {Donham, Thomas. Huddersfield. 1869. {Donisthorpe,G. T. St. David’s Hill, Exeter. 1877. *Donkin, Bryan. May’s Hill, Shortlands, Kent. 1874, {Donnell, Professor, M.A. 76 Stephen’s-ereen South, Dublin. 1861. {Donnelly, Captain, R.E. South Kensington Museum, London, W. 1857. *Donnetty, Wit11AM, O.B., Registrar-General for Ireland, Charle< mont House, Dublin. 1857. {Donovan, M., M.R.I.A. Clave-street, Dublin. 1867. {Dougall, Andrew Maitland, R.N. Scotscraig, Tayport, Fifeshire, 1871. {Dougall, John, M.D. 2 Cecil-place, Paisley-road, Glasgow. 1876. *Douglas, Rey. G. C. M. 10 Fitzroy-place, Glasgow. 1877. *Douglass, James N., C.E, Trinity House, London, E,C, 1878. §Douglass, William. 104 Baggot-street, Dublin. 1855. {Dovu, Hucror. Rose Cottage, Trinity, near Edinburgh. 1870. {Dowie, J. M. Wetstones, West Kirby, Cheshire. ~ 1876. §Dowie, Mrs. Muir, Wetstones, West Kirby, Cheshire. 1878. §Dowling, Thomas. Clonbrock Lodge, Rathgar, Dublin. 1857. {Downine, 8., C.E., LL.D., Professor of Civil Engineering in the University of Dublin. 4 The Hill, Monkstown, Co. Dublin, 1878. §Dowse, The Right Hon. Baron. 38 Mountjoy-square, Dublin, 1872. *Dowson, Edward, M.D. 117 Park-street, London, W. 1865. *Dowson, E. Theodore. Geldeston, near Beccles, Suffolk. 1868.§§Drusser, Henry E., F.Z.8. 6 Tenterden-street, Hanover-square, London, W. 1873, §Drew, Frederic, F.G.S., F.R.G.S._ Eton College, Windsor, 1869. §Drew, Joseph, LL.D., F.R.A.S., F.G.8. Weymouth. 1865. {Drew, Robert A. 6 Stanley-place, Duke-street, Broughton, Man chester. 1872, *Druce, Frederick, 27 Oriental-place, Brighton. 1874, {Druitt, Charles. Hampden-terrace, Rugby-road, Belfast. 1859, {Drummond, Robert. 17 Stratton-street, London, W, 24 LIST OF MEMBERS, Year of Election. 1866. *Dry, Thomas. 23 Gloucester-road, Regent’s Park, London, N.W. 1870. §Drysdale, J. J.. M.D. 36a Rodney-street, Liverpool. 1856, *Ducrzn, The Right. Hon. Henry Jonn Reynotps Moreron, Earl of, F.R.S.,F.G.S. 16 Portman-square, London, W. ; and Tort- worth Court, Wotton-under-Edge. 1870, {Duckworth, Henry, F.L.S., F.G.S. Holmfield House, Grassendale, Liverpool. 1867, *Durr, Mountstvuart Expuinstonre Grant-, LL.B., M.P. York House, Twickenham, Middlesex. 1852, {Dufferin and Clandeboye, The Right Hon. the Earl of, K.P., K.C.B., F.R.S. Clandeboye, near Belfast, Ireland. 1877. §Duffey, George F., M.D. 30 Fitzwilliam-place, Dublin. 1875. §Duffin, W. E. L’Estrange, C.K. Waterford. 1859, *Duncan, Alexander. 7 Prince’s-gate, London, 8. W. 1859. {Duncan, Charles, 52 Union-place, Aberdeen, 1866, *Duncan, James. 71 Cromwell-road, South Kensington, London, W. Duncan, J. F., M.D. 8 Upper Merrion-street, Dublin. 1871. {Duncan, James Matthew, M.D. 30 Charlotte-square, Edinburgh. 1867, {Duncan, Peter Martin, M.B.,F.R.S., F.G.S., Professor of Geology in King’s College, London. 99 Abbey-road, St. John’s Wood, London, N.W. Dunlop, Alexander. Clober, Milngavie, near Glasgow. 1853, *Dunlop, William Henry. Annanhill, Kilmarnock, Ayrshire. 1865, {Dunn, David. Annet House, Skelmorlie, by Greenock, N.B. 1876. *Dunn, James. 64 Robertson-street, Glasgow. 1862.§§Dunn, Rosert, F.R.C.S. 31 Norfolk-street, Strand, London, W.C. 1876. {Dunnachie, James. 2 West Regent-street, Glasgow. 1878. §Dunne, D. B., M.A., Ph.D., Professor of Logie in the Catholic Uni- versity of Ireland. 4 Clanwilliam-place, Dublin. Dunnington-Jefferson, Rey. Joseph, M.A., F.C.P.S. Thicket Hall, York, 1859. {Duns, Rev. John, D.D., F.R.S.E. New College, Edinburgh. 1866, {Duprey, Perry. Woodbury Down, Stoke Newington, London, N. 1869, {D’Urban, W. 8S. M., F.L.S. 4 Queen-terrace, Mount Radford, Exeter. 1860. {DuRHam, ArtHuR Epwarp, F.R.C.S., F.L.S., Demonstrator of Anatomy, Guy’s Hospital. 82 Brook-street, Grosyenor-square, London, W. Dykes, Robert. Kilmorie, Torquay, Devon. 1869, §Dymond, Edward E. Oaklands, Aspley Guise, Woburn. 1868. {Eade, Peter, M.D. Upper St. Giles’s-street, Norwich. 1861, {Eadson, Richard. 13 Hyde-road, Manchester. 1877.§§Earle, Ven. Archdeacon, M.A. West Alvington, Devon. *EARNSHAW, Rey. Samvrt, M.A. 14 Broomfield, Sheffield. 1874, §Eason, Charles, 30 Kenilworth-square, Rathgar, Dublin. 1871. *Easton, Epwarp, C.E. 7 Delahay-street, Westminster, 8. W. 1865, §Easton, James. Nest House, near Gateshead, Durham. 1876. ae i ohn,C.E. Durie House, Abercromby-street, Helensburgh, 1870, §Eaton, Richard. Basford, Nottingham. Ebden, Rev. James Collett, M.A., F.R.A.S. Great Stukeley Vicarage, Huntingdonshire. 1861. {Ecroyd, William Farrer. Spring Cottage, near Burnley. 1858, *Eddison, Francis, Martinstown, Dorchester. 1870, *Eddison, Dr. John Edwin. 29 Park-square, Leeds. LIST OF MEMBERS, 25+ Year of Election. *Eddy, James Ray, F.G.S. Carleton Grange, Skipton, Eden, Thomas. Talbot-road, Oxton. *Eperworta, Micuart P., F.L.S., F.R.A.S. Mastrim House, Anerley, London, S.E. 1855, {Edmiston, Robert. Elmbank-crescent, Glasgow. 1859. {Edmond, James, Cardens Haugh, Aberdeen. 1870, *Edmonds, F, B. 72 Portsdown-road, London, W. 1867, *Edward, Allan: Farineton Hall, Dundee. 1867. {Edward, Charles. Chambers, 8 Bank-street, Dundee. 1867. {Edward, James. Balruddery, Dundee. 1855, *Epwarps, Professor J. Baker, Ph.D., D.C.L. Montreal, Canada. 1867, {Edwards, William. 70 Princes-street, Dundee. *EGERTON, Sir Poitrp pE Mapas Grey, Bart., M.P., F.R.S., F.G.S. Oulton Park, Tarporley, Cheshire. 1859, *Hisdale, David A., M.A. 38 Dublin-street, Edinburgh. 1878. tElcock, Charles. 39 Lyme-street, Shakspere-street, Ardwick, Man- chester. 7 1876. {Elder, Mrs. 6 Claremont-terrace, Glasgow. 1868, {Elger, Thomas Gwyn Empy, F.R.A.S. St. Mary, Bedford. Ellacombe, Rey. H. T., F.S.A. Clyst St. George, Topsham,. Devon. 1863. {Ellenberger, J. L. Worksop. 1855. §Elliot, Robert, F.B.S.E. Wolfelee, Hawick, N.B. 1861, *Exxror, Sir Watrer, K.C.S.1., F.R.S., F.L.S. Wolfelee, Hawick,, N.B 1864. {Elliott, E. B. Washington, United States. 1872, {Elliott, Rev. E. B. 11 Sussex-square, Kemp Town, Brighton. Elliott, John Foge. Elvet Hill, Durham, 1864, *Eiiis, ALEXANDER Jonny, B.A., F.R.S., F.S.A. 25 Argyll-road,, Kensington, London, W. 1877.§§Ellis, Arthur Devonshire. School of Mines, Jermyn-street, London, S.W.; and Thurnscoe Hall, Rotherham, Yorkshire. 1875, *Ellis, H. D. Fair Park House, Exeter. 1864, *Ellis, Joseph. Hampton Lodge, Brighton. 1864, fEllis, J. Walter. High House, Thornwaite, Ripley, Yorkshire. *Ellis, Rev. Robert, A.M. The Institute, St. Saviour’s Gate,. York. 1869. {Ellis, William Horton. Pennsylvania, Exeter. Ellman, Rey. E. B. Berwick Rectory, near Lewes, Sussex. 1862. {Elphinstone, H. W., M.A., F.L.S. Cadogan-place, London, S.W. 1868. {Embleton, Dennis, M.D. Northumberland-street, Newcastle-on- Tyne. 1868. 4Eimery, Rey. W., B.D. Corpus Christi College, Cambridge. 1858. {Empson, Christopher. Bramhope Hall, Leeds. 1866, {Enfield, Richard. Low Pavement, Nottingham. 1866. {Enfield, William. Low Pavement, Nottingham. 1853. {English, Edgar Wilkins. Yorkshire Banking Company, Lowgate,. ull. 1869, {Enelish, J.T. Stratton, Cornwall. ENNISKILLEN, The Right Hon. Witt1am Wii.ovensy, Earl of, LL.D., D.C.L., F.R.S., F.G.S., M.R.LA. 65 Eaton-place,. London, 8.W.; and Florence Court, Fermanagh, Ireland. 1869. *Enys, John Davis. Care of F. G. Enys, Esq., Enys, Penryn, Cornwall. 1844, {Erichsen, John Eric, F.R.S., F.R.C.S., Professor of Clinical Surgery in University College, London. 6 Cavendish-place, London, W. 1864, *Eskrigge, R. A., F.G.S. 18 Hackins-hey, Liverpool, 26 Year of LIST OF MEMBERS. Election. 1862. 1878, 1869, 1870, 1865. 1872, 1876. 1869, 1861. 1876, 1865. 1875. 1866, 1865. 1871.§ 1868. 1863. 1874. 1874. 1859. *Esson, WiiiiAm, M.A., F.R.S., F.C.S., F-R.A.S.. Merton College ; and 1 Bradmore-road, Oxford. §Estcourt, Charles, F.C.S. 8 St. James’s-square, John Dalton-street, Manchester. Estcourt, Rev. W. J. B. Long Newton, Tetbury. {Ernerrper, Rosrrt, F.R.S. lias Ei F? G. 8., Rolnonilanet to the Geological Survey of Great Britain. Museum of. Practical Geology, Jermyn-street ; and 19 Halsey-street, Cadogan-place, London, 8. W. *Hyvans, Arthur John, F.S.A. Nash Mills, Hemel Hempsted. *Kyans, Rey. Cuartus, M.A. The Rectory, Solihull, Birmingham. *Evans, Frederick J., C.E. Clayponds, Brentford, Middlesex, W. fEvans, Captain Freperick J. O., C.B., R.N., F.R.S., F-R.A.S., F.R.G.8., Hydrographer to the Admiralty. 116 Victoria-street, Westminster, S.W. *Evans, H. Saville W. Wimbledon Park House, Wimbledon, S.W iS re * *Evans, Jonny, D.C.L., F.R.S., F.S.A., F.G.S.. 65 Old’ Bailey, London, E.C.; and Nash Mills, Hemel Hempsted. tEvans; Mortimer, C.E. 97 West Regent-street, Glasgow. tEvans, Sepastran, M.A., LL.D. Haighgate, near Birmingham. tEyans, Sparke. 3 Apsley-road, Clifton, Bristol. {Evans, Thomas, F.G.8. Belper, Derbyshire. *Evans, William. Ellerslie, Augustus-road, Edgbaston, Birmingham. §Eve, H. W. Wellington Colleze, Wokingham, Berkshire. *Everert, J. D.,D.C.L., F.B.S. i. 65 Professor of Natural Philosophy in Queen’s College, Belfast. Rushmere, Malone-voad, Belfast. *Hyeritt, George Allen, F.R.G.S. Knowle Hall, Warwickshire. tHwart, William. Glenmachan, Belfast. tEwart, W. Quartus. Glenmachan, Belfast. *Ewine, Archibald Orr, M.P. Ballikinrain Castle, Killearn, Stirling- shire. . *Ewing, James Alfred, B.Sc., F.R.S.E., Professor of Mechanical Hn- gineering in the University of Tokio, Japan. 12 Laurel Bank, Dundee, - . *Exley, John T., M.A. 1 Cotham-road, Bristol. . *Eyre, George Edward, F.G.8., F.R.G.S. 59 Lowndes-square, London, 8.W.; and Warrens, near Lyndhurst, Hants. . [Eyrn, Major-General Sir Vincent, F.R.G.S. Atheneum Club, Pali Mall, London, 8. W. Eyton, Charles. Hendred House, Abingdon. . {Eyton, T, C. Eyton, near Wellington, Salop. Fairbairn, Thomas. Manchester. . [Fairley, Thomas, F'.R.S.E. 8 Newington-groye, Leeds. . {Faizlie, James M. Charing Cross Corner, Glasgow. . Fairlie, Robert, C.E. Woodlands, Clapham Common, London, S$. W. . {Fallkmer, F. H. Lyncombe, Bath. . §Faraday, F. J., F.S.S8. College Chambers, 17 Brazenose-street, Man- chester. . {Farquharson, Robert O. Houghton, Aberdeen. . §Farr, WririrAM, M.D., D.C.L., F.R.S., Superintendent of the Statis- tical Department, General Register Office,London. Southlands, Bickley, Kent. . *Farrar, Rey. Freperick Witim, M.A., D.D., F.R.S., Canon of Westminster. St. Margaret’s Rectory, Westminster, 5. W. . [Farrelly, Rey. Thomas. Royal College, Maynooth. LIST OF MEMBERS, 27 lection. 1869. *Faulding, J an The Grange, Greenhill Park, New Barnet, Herts. 1869. {Faulding, W. F. Didsbury College, Manchester. 1859, *Fawcnrr, Henry, M.A., M.P., Professor of Political Economy in the University of Cambridge. 51 The Lawn, South Lambeth-road, : London, 8.W.; and 8 Trumpington-street, Cambridge. 1863. {Fawcus, George, Alma-place, North Shields, 1873. *Fazakerley, Miss, The Castle, Denbigh. 1845, {Felkin, William, F.L.S. The Park, Nottingham. Fell, John B. Spark? s Bridge, Ulverstone, Lancashire. 1864, $F ELLOws, Frank P., F.S.A., F.S.S. 8 The Green, Hampstead, 1852. 1876. 1876. 1859, 1871. 1867. 1857. 1854, 1867. 1863. 1862. 1873. 1875. 1868. 1869. 1876. 1864, 1878. 1868. 1863. 1851. 1858. 1869. 1873. “1875. 1858, 1871. 1871. 1868. 1878. 1878. 1857, 1857, London, N. W. {Fenton, 8. Greame, 9 Colleve-square ; and Keswick, near Belfast. *Fereus, Andrew, M.D. 3 Elmbank-crescent, Glasgow. {Ferguson, Alexander A. 11 Grosvenor- -terrace, Glasgow. {Ferguson, John. Cove, Nige, Inverness. *Ferguson, John, M.A., Professor of Chemistry in the University of Glasgow. {Ferguson, “Robert M., Ph. D., F.R.S.E. 8 Queen-street, Edinburgh. {Ferguson, Samuel, ats, De fav C. 20 Great George’s-street North, Dublin. tFereuson, William, F.L.S., F.G.S. | Kinmundy, near Mintlaw, Aberdeenshire. *Fergusson, H. B. 13 Airlie-place, Dundee. *FERNIE, JoHN. SBonchurch, Isle of Wight. {Frrrers, Rey. Norman MacLrop, M.A., F.R.S. Caius College, Cambridge. {Ferrier, David, M.A., M.D., F.R.S., Professor of Forensic Medicine in King’s College. 16 "Upper Berkeley-street, London, W. {Fiddes, Walter. Clapton Villa, Tyndall’s Park, Clifton, Bristol. tField, Edward. Norwich. *Frnztp, Rogers, B.A., C.E. 5 Cannon-row, Westminster, S.W. tFielden, James. 2 Darnley-street, Pollokshields, near Glasgow. t¥inch, Frederick George, B.A., F.G.S. 21 Croom’s-hill, Greenwich, S.E Finch, John. Bridge Work, Chepstow. Finch, John, jun. Bridge Work, Chepstow. *Findlater, William. 2 Fitzwilliam-square, Dublin. {Firth, G. "W.W. St. Giles’ s-street, Norwich. Firth, Thomas. Northwick. *Firth, William. Burley Wood, near Leeds. *FiscHer, Wititram L. F., MA., LLD., F.R.S. St. Andrews, Scotland. {Fishbourne, Captain E. G., R.N. 6 Welamere-terrace, Paddington, London, W. {Fisuer, Rey. Osmonp, M.A., F.G.S. Harlston Rectory, near Cambridge. §Fisher, William. Maes Fron, near Welshpool, Montgomeryshire, *Fisher, W. W., M.A., F.C.S. 2 Park-crescent, Oxford. {Fishwick, Henry. Carr-hill, Rochdale. *Fison, Frederick W., F.C.S. Eastmoor, Ilkley, Yorkshire. ro a Gay MA. 5 Lancaster-terrace, Regent’s Park, London, {Fitch, Robert, F.G.8., F.S.A. Norwich. §Fitzgerald, C. E., M.D. 27 Upper Merrion-street, Dublin. §Fitzgerald, George Francis. Trinity College, Dublin. {Fitzgerald, The Right Hon, Lord Otho. 13 Dominick-street, Dublin, {Pitzpatrick, Thomas, M.D. 381 Lower Baggot-street, Dublin, 28 LIST OF MEMBERS, Year of Election. 1865. {Fleetwood, D. J. 45 George-street, St. Paul’s, Birmingham. Fleetwood, Sir Peter Hesketh, Bart. Rossall Hall, Fleetwood, Lancashire. 1850. {Fleming, Professor Alexander, M.D. 121 Hagley-road, Birmingham, Fleming, Christopher, M.D. Merrion-square North, Dublin, 1876, tFleming, James Brown. Beaconsfield, Kelvinside, near Glasgow. Fleming, John G., M.D. 155 Bath-street, Glasgow. 1876. {Fleming, Sandford. Ottawa, Canada. *FLEMING, WILLIAM, M.D. Rowton Grange, near Chester, 1867. §FLercHEr, ALFRED E. 5 Edge-lane, Liverpool. 1870. {Fletcher, B. Edgington. Norwich. 1853. {FLercuer, Isaac, M.P., F.RS., F.R.A.S., F.G.S. Tarn Bank, Workington. 1869, {Fiercuer, Lavineron E., 0.E. 41 Corporation-street, Manchester. Fletcher, T. B. E., M.D. 7 Waterloo-street, Birmingham. 1862. {FLowER, Witi1am Henry, F.R.S., F.LS., F.G.S., F.R.C.S., Hun- terian Professor of Comparative Anatomy, and Conservator of the Museum of the Royal College of Surgeons. Royal College of Surgeons, Lincoln’s-Inn-fields, London, W.C. 1877. *Floyer, Ernest A., F.R.G.S. 7 The Terrace, Putney, 8.W, 1867. {Foggie, William. Woodville, Maryfield, Dundee. 1873. *Forbes, Professor George, M.A., F.R.S.E. Andersonian University, Glasgow. 1855. tForbes, Rey. John. Symington Manse, Biggar, Scotland. 1877. §Forbes, W. A. West Wickham, Kent. Ford, H. R. Morecombe Lodge, Yealand Conyers, Lancashire. 1866. {Ford, William. Hartsdown Villa, Kensington Park-gardens East, London, W. 1875, *ForpHam, H. Grorex, F.G.S. Odsey, near Royston, Herts. *Forrest, William Hutton. 1 Pitt-terrace, Stirling. 1867. {Forster, Anthony. Finlay House, St. Leonard’s-on-Sea. 1858. *Forster, The Right Hon. Witt1am Epwarp, M.P., F.R.S. 80 Eccleston-square, London, 8.W.; and Wharfeside, Burley-in- Wharfedale, Leeds. 1854. *Fort, Richard. Read Hall, Whalley, Lancashire. 1877.§§Fortrscvug, The Right Hon. the Earl. Castle Hill, North Devon. 1870. {Forwood, William B. Hopeton House, Seaforth, Liverpool. 1875, {Foster, A. Le Neve. East Hill, Wandsworth, Surrey, 5.W. 1865. {Foster, Balthazar, M.D., Professor of Medicine in Queen’s College, ° Birmingham. 16 Temple-row, Birmingham. 1865. *Fostrr, CLemEent LE Neve, B.A., D.Sc, F.G.S. Truro, Corn- wall. 1857. *Fosrmr, Grorce Carey, B.A., F.R.S., F.C.S., Professor of Physics in University College, London. 12 Hilldrop-road, London, N. *Foster, Rev. John, M.A. The Oaks Vicarage, Loughborough. 1845. {Foster, John N. Sandy Place, Sandy, Bedfordshire. 1877. §Foster, Joseph B. 6 James-street, Plymouth. 1859. *Fosrer, Micuart, M.A., M.D., F.R.S., F.LS., F.C.S. Trinity College, and Great Shelford, near Cambridge. 1859. §Fostrr, Prrer Le Nryr, M.A. Society of Arts, Adelphi, London, W.C 1873. {Foster, Peter Le Neve, jun. Society of Arts, Adelphi, London, W.C. 1863. {Foster, Robert. 30 Rye-hill, Newcastle-upon-Tyne. 1859. *Foster, 8. Lloyd. Old Park Hall, Walsall, Staffordshire. 1873. *Foster, William. Harrowins House, Queensbury, Yorkshire. LIST OF MEMBERS. 29 Year of Election. 1842. Fothergill, Benjamin. 10 The Grove, Boltons, West Brompton, London, S.W. 1870. {Foulger, Edward. 55 Kirkdale-road, Liverpool. 1866.§§Fowler, George, M.I.C.E., F.G.S. Basford Hall, near Nottingham. 1868. {Fowler, G.G. Gunton Hall, Lowestoft, Suffolk. 1876. §Fowler, John. 4 Gray-street, Glasgow. 1870. *Fowler, Robert Nicholas, M.A.,F.R.G.S. 50 Cornhill, London, E.C. 1868. {Fox, Major-General A. H. Lanz, F.R.S., F.G.S., F.R.G.S., F.S.A. Guildford, Surrey. *Fox, Rey. Edward, M.A. Upper Heyford, Banbury. 1876.§§Fox, G.S. Lane. 9 Sussex-place, London, S.W. *Fox, Joseph Hayland. The Cleve, Wellington, Somerset. 1860. {Fox, Joseph John. Church-row, Stoke Newington, London, N. 1866. *Francis,G. B. Inglesby House, Stoke Newington-green, London, N. Francis, WILLIAM, Ph.D., F.L.S., F.G.8., F.R.A.S. Red Lion-court, Fleet-street, London, E.C.; and Manor House, Richmond, Surrey. 1846, {FRanKLAND, Epwarp, D.C.L., Ph.D., F.R.S., F.C.S., Professor of Chemistry in the Royal School of Mines. 14 Lancaster-gate, London, W. *Frankland, Rey. Marmaduke Charles. Chowbent, near Manchester. 1859. {Fraser, George B. 3 Airlie-place, Dundee. Fraser, James. 25 Westland-row, Dublin. Fraser, James William. 8A Kensington Palace-gardens, London, W. 1865. *Fraser, Joun, M.A., M.D. Chapel Ash, Wolverhampton. 1871. {Fraser, Tuomas R., M.D., F.R.S. L. & E. 3 Grosvenor-street, Edinburgh. 1876. {Fraser, Rey. William, LL.D. Free Middle Manse, Paisley. 1859. *Frazer, Daniel. 113 Buchanan-street, Glasgow. 1871. {Frazer, Evan L. R. Brunswick-terrace, Spring Bank, Hull. 1860. {Freeborn, Richard Fernandez. 38 Broad-street, Oxford. 1847. *Freeland, Humphrey William, F.G.S. West-street, Chichester, Sussex. 1877.§§Freeman, Francis Ford. Blackfriars House, Plymouth. 1865. {Freeman, James. 15 Francis-road, Edgbaston, Birmingham. Frere, George Edward, F.R.S. Roydon Hall, Diss, Norfolk. 1869. {Frerz, The Right Hon. Sir H. Barrrz E., Bart., G.C.S.1., G.C.B., E.R.S., F.R.G.S., Governor of Cape Colony and Dependencies. Government House, Cape Town. 1869. {Frere, Rey. William Edward. The Rectory, Bilton, near Bristol. 1857. *Frith, Richard Hastings, C.H,, M.R.LA., F.R.G.S.I. 48 Summer- hill, Dublin. 1869. {Frodsham, Charles. 26 Upper Bedford-place, Russell-square, Lon- don, W.C. 1847. {Frost, William. Wentworth Lodge, Upper Tulse Hill, London, 8. W. 1860, *FRoupz, Witt1aM, M.A., C.E., F.R.S. Chelston Cross, Torquay. 1875. {Fry, F. J. 104 Pembroke-road, Clifton, Bristol. Fry, Francis. Cotham, Bristol. 1875. *Fry, Joseph Storrs. 2 Charlotte-street, Bristol. Fry, Richard. Cotham Lawn, Bristol. 1872. *Fuller, Rev. A. Pallant, Chichester. 1873. [Fuller, Claude S., R.N, 44 Holland-road, Kensington, London, W. 1859. {FutLER, Freperick, M.A., Professor of Mathematics in the Uni- versity and King’s College, Aberdeen. 1869. {Furimr, Gnoren, C.E.; Professor of Engineering in Queen’s College, Belfast. 6 College-gardens, Belfast. 1864, *Furneaux, Rey. Alan. St. German’s Parsonage, Cornwall. 30 LIST OF MEMBERS. Year of Election. *Gadesden, Augustus William, F.S.A, Ewell Castle, Surrey. 1857. {Gaezs, ALpHonsE, M.R.LA. Museum of Irish Industry, Dublin. 1863. *Gainsford, W. D. Richmond Hill, Sheffield. 1876. {Gairdner, Charles. Mount Vernon, Shettleston, N.B. 1850, {Gairdner, Professor W. T., M.D. 225 St. Vincent-street, Glaseow. 1861. {Galbraith, Andrew. Glasgow. GaLBRAITH, Rey. J. A., M.A., M.R.I.A. Trinity College, Dublin, 1876. {Gale, James M. 23 Miller-street, Glascow. 1863. tGale, Samuel, F.C.S. 338 Oxford-street, London, W. 1861. {Galloway, Charles John. Knott Mill Iron Works, Manchester, 1861. {Galloway, John, jun. Knott Mill Iron Works, Manchester, 1875. §Galloway, W., H.M. Inspector of Mines. Cardiff. 1860, *Gatron, Captain Dovetas, C.B., D.C.L., F.R.S., F.LS., F.G.S., F.R.G.S. (GENERAL SECRETARY.) 12 Chester-street, Grosvenor- place, London, 8. W. 1860. *Gatton, Francis, M.A., F.RS., F.G.S., F-R.G.S. 42 Rutland- gate, Knightsbridge, London, 8. W. 1869. {Garron, Jonn C., M.A., F.L.8S. 13 Margaret-street, Cayendish- square, London, W. 1870. §Gamble, Lieut.-Colonel D. St. Helen’s, Lancashire, 1870. {Gamble, J.C. St. Helen’s, Lancashire. 1872. *Gamble, John G., M.A. 10 Vyvyan-terrace, Clifton, Bristol; and Albion House, Rottingdean, Brighton. 1877.§§Gamble, William. St. Helen’s, Lancashire. 1868, {Gamern, Arraur, M.D., F.R.S., F.R.S.E., Professor of Physiology in Owens College, Manchester. Fairview, Princes-road, Fal- lowfield, Manchester. 1862. §GaRnER, Ropert, F.L.S. Stoke-upon-Trent. 1865. §Garner, Mrs. Robert. Stoke-upon-Trent. 1842, Garnett, Jeremiah. Warren-street, Manchester. 1873. {Garnham, John. 123 Bunhill-row, London, E.C. 1874. *Garstin, John Ribton, M.A., LL.B., M.R.LA., F.S.A. Bragans- town, Castlebellingham, Ireland. 1870. {Gaskell, Holbrook. Woolton Wood, Liverpool. 1870. *Gaskell, Holbrook, jun. Mayfield-road, Grassendale, Liverpool. 1847, *Gaskell, Samuel. Windham Club, St. James’s-square, London, S.W 1842. Gaskell, Rev. William, M.A. Plymouth-eroye, Manchester. 1862. *Gatty, Charles Henry, M.A., F.L.8.,F.G.S. Felbridge Park, East Grinstead, Sussex. 1875. §Gavey, J. 43 Stacey-road, Routh, Cardiff. 1875. §Gaye, Henry 8. Newton Abbott, Devon. 1878. {Geach, R. G. Craee Wood, Rawdon, Yorkshire. 1871. {Geddes, John, 9 Melville-crescent, Edinburgh. 1859. [Geddes, William D., M.A., Professor of Greek, King’s College, Old ; Aberdeen. 1854, {Gee, Robert, M.D. 5 Abercromby-square, Liverpool. 1867.§§Grrxin, ARCHIBALD, LL.D., F.R.S. L. & E., F.G.S., Director of the Geological Survey of Scotland. Geological Survey Office, Vic- toria-street, Edinburgh ; and Boroughfield, Edinburgh. 1871. §Geikie, James, F.R.S.L. & E., F.G.S. 16 Duncan-terrace, New- ington, Edinburgh. 1855. [Gemmell, Andrew. 38 Queen-street, Glasgow. 1875. *George, Rey. Hereford B., M.A., F.R.G.S. New College, Oxford. 1854, Gerard, Henry. 84 Rumford-place, Liverpool. 1870, {Gerstl, R. University College, London, W.C. 1870, *Gervis, Walter 8., M.D., F.R.G.S. Ashburton, Devonshire, Year of Election 1856, 1865. 1871. 1868. 1874, 1876, 1852. 1870. 1870, 1842. 1857. 1859. 1878. 1878. 1871. 1868. 1864, 1861. 1867. 1876. 1867.§ 1869 1874, 1850, 1849, 1861, 1875. 1861, 1871. 1853. 1870. 1859, 1867, 1874, 1874, 1870. 1872. 1878, 1852. 1846, LIST OF MEMBERS. 31 *Gething, George Barkley. Springfield, Newport, Monmouthshire, {Gibbins, William. Battery Works, Digbeth, Birmingham, fGibson, Alexander. 10 Albany-street, Edinburgh. {Gibson, C. M. Bethel-street, Norwich. {Gibson, Edward, Q.0. 23 Fitzwilliam-square, Dublin, *Gibson, George Alexander, M.B., D.Sec., F.G.S. 10 Old-square, Birmingham. *Gibson, George Stacey. Saffron Walden, Essex. tGibson, James, M.A.,Q.C. 35 Mountjoy-square South, Dublin. tGibson, Thomas. 51 Oxford-street, Liverpool. tGibson, Thomas, jun. 10 Parkfield-road, Prince’s Park, Liver- ool, instar JosrpH Henry, Ph.D., F.R.S., F.C.S. Harpenden, near St. Albans. {Gilbert, J. T., M.R.LA. Villa Nova, Blackrock, Dublin. *Gilchrist, James, M.D. Crichton House, Dumfries. Gilderdale, Rey. John, M.A. Walthamstow, Essex. §Giles, Oliver. 16 Bellevue-crescent, Clifton, Bristol. Giles, Rev. William. Netherleizh House, near Chester, §Gill, Rev. A. W. H. 44 Eaton-square, London, 8. W. *GitL, Davin, jun. 36 Pembroke-road, Kensington, London, W. {Gill, Joseph. Palermo, Sicily. (Care of W. H. Gill, Esq., General Post Office, St. Martin’s-le~Grand, E.C.) tGrtz, Tomas. 4 Sydney-place, Bath. *Gilroy, George. Hindley Hall, Wigan. {Gilroy, Robert. Oraigie, by Dundee. §Gimingham, Charles H. 45 St. Augustine’s-road, Camden-square, London, N.W. §Grnssure, Rey. 0. D., D.C.L., LL.D. Wokingham, Berkshire. . {Girdlestone, Rev. Canon E., M.A. Halberton Vicarage, Tiverton. *Girdwood, James Kennedy. Old Park, Belfast. *Gladstone, George, F.C.S., F.R.G.S, 31 Ventnor-villas, Cliftonville, Brighton. *Guapsronz, Jonn Hart, Ph.D., F-RS., F.OS, 17 Pembridge- square, Hyde Park, London, W. ; *Gladstone, Murray. 35 Wilton-crescent, London, 8. W. *Glaisher, Ernest Henry. 1 Dartmouth-place, Blackheath, London, 3.E *GLAIsHER, James, F.R.S., F.R.AS. 1 Dartmouth-place, Black- heath, London, S.E. *GuaisHer, J. W. L., M.A, F.RS., F.R.AS. Trinity College, Cambridge. tGleadon, Thomas Ward. Moira-buildings, Hull. §Glen, David Corse, F.G.8. 14 Annfield-place, Glasgow.: fGlennie, J. S, Stuart. 6 Stone-buildings, Lincoln’s Inn, London, W.C. tGloag, John A. L. 10 Inverleith-place, Edinburgh. Glover, George. Ranelagh-road, Pimlico, London, 8. W. §Glover, George T, 30 Donegall-place, Belfast. Glover, Thomas. Becley Old Hall, Rowsley, Bakewell. {Glover, Thomas. 77 Claverton-street, London, S.W, {Glynn, Thomas R. 1 Rodney-street, Liverpool. tGopparp, Rronarp. 16 Booth-street, Bradford, Yorkshire. *Godlee, J. Lister. 3 New-square, Lincoln’s Inn, London, W.C. tGodwin, John. Wood House, Rostrevor, Belfast. {Gopwin-Ausren, Roprerr A, C., B.A., F.R.S., F.G.8S, Shalford House, Guildford, 32 LIST OF MEMBERS. Year of Election. 1876. {Goff, Bruce, M.D. Bothwell, Lanarkshire. 1877. §Gorr, James. The Mansion "House, Dublin. 1873.§§Goldthorp, Miss R. F.C Cleckheaton, Bradford, Yorkshire. 1878. §Good, Rey. Thomas, B.D. 51 Wellington-road, Dublin. 1852. {Goodbody, Jonathan. Clare, King’s County, Ireland. 1870. ¢{Goodison, George William, C.E. Gateacre, Liverpool. 1842. *Goopman, Jonn, M.D. 8 Leicester-street, Southport. 1865. {Goodman, J. D. Minories, Birmingham. 1869. {Goodman, Neville. Peterhouse, Cambridge. 1870. *Goodwin, Rev. Henry Albert, M.A., F.R.A.S. Lambourne Rectory, Romford. 1878. §Gorpon, J. E. H., B.A. (Assistant Secretary.) Holmwood Cottage, Dorking. 1871. Bai Joseph Gordon, F.C.S. 20 King-street, St. James’s, London, 1840. tGordon, Lewis D. B. Totteridge, Whetstone, London, N. 1857. {Gordon, Samuel, M.D. 11 Hume-street, Dublin. 1865. {Gore, George, Liens F.R.S. 50 Islington-row, Edgbaston, Bir- mingham. 1870. {Gossage, William. Winwood, Woolton, Liverpool. 1875. *Gotch, Francis. Stokes Croft, Bristol. *Gotch, Rev. Frederick William, LL.D. Stokes Croft, Bristol. *Gotch, Thomas Henry. Kettering. 1873. §Gott, ’ Charles, M.LC.E. Parkfield-road, Manningham, Bradford, Yorkshire. 1849. t{Gough, The Hon. Frederick. Perry Hall, Birmingham. 1857. tGough, The Right Hon. George &., Viscount, M.A,, F.LS., F.G.S. t. Helen’s s, Booterstown, Dublin. 1868. {Gould, i George. Unthank- road, Norwich. Goutp, Joun, F.R.S., F.L.S., F.R. G. S.,F.Z.S. 26 Charlotte-street, Bedford-square, ‘London, W.C. 1873. tGourlay, J. McMillan. 21 St. Andrew’ s-place, Bradford, Yorkshire. 1867. {Gourley, Henry (Engineer). Dundee. 1876. §Gow, Robert. Cairndowan, Dowanhill, Glasgow. Gowland, James. London-wall, London, EC. 1873. §Goyder, Dr. D. Manville-crescent, Bradford, Yorkshire. 1861. {Grafton, Frederick W. Park-road, Whalley Range, Manchester. 1867. *Granam, Oyrit, F.LS., F.R.G. Ss. 9 Cleveland-row, St. James’s, London, 8. W. 1875. {GRAHAME, JAMES, Auldhouse, Pollokshaws, near Glasgow. 1852. *Grainger, Rev. John, D.D., M.R. LA. Skerry and Ratheavan Rectory, Broughshane, near Ballymena, Co. Antrim. 1871. {Grant, Sir ALEXANDER, Bart., M.A., Principal of the University of Edinburgh, 21 Lansdowne-crescent, Edinburgh. 1870.§§GRANT, Colonel J. ARG). Bo aOisale, F.RBS., FLAS, F.R.G.S. 19 Upper Grosvenor-street, "London, W. 1859, {Grant, Hon. James. Cluny Cottage, Forres. 1855. *Grant, Ropert, M.A., LL.D., F. R. g., F.R.A. S., Regius Professor of Astronomy in the University of Glasgow. The Observatory, Glasgow. 1854, {GranrHam, Ricwarp B., C.B., F.G.S. 22 Whitehall-place, London, S.W. 1864, {Grantham, Richard F. 22 Whitehall-place, London, S.W. 1874, {Graves, Rev. James, B.A., M.R.I.A. Inisnag Glebe, Stonyford, Co. Kilkenny. *Graves, Rev. Richard Hastings, D.D. 31 Raglan-road, Dublin. 1864. *Gray, Rev. Charles. The Vicarage, Blyth, Worksop. LIST OF MEMBERS. co vo Year of Election, 1865. {Gray, Charles. Swan-bank, Bilston. 1870. {Gray, C. B. 5 Rumford-place, Liverpool, 1876. {Gray, Dr. Newton-terrace, Glasgow. 1857. {Gray, Sir John, M.D. Rathgar, Dublin. 1864. {Gray, Jonathan. Summerhill House, Bath. 1859. {Gray, Rev. J. H. Boisover Castle, Derbyshire. 1870. §Gray, J. Macfarlane. 127 Queen’s-road, Peckham, London, S.F. 1878. §Gray, Matthew Hamilton. 14 St. John’s Park, Blackheath, London, S.E. 1878. §Gray, Robert Kaye. 14 St. John’s Park, Blackheath, London, 8.E. 1875. {Gray, William, M.R.I.A. 6 Mount Charles, Belfast. *Gray, WILLIAM, F.G.S. Gray’s-court, Minster Yard, York. ; *Gray, Colonel Witt1am. Farley Hall, near Reading. 1854, *Grazebrook, Henry. Clent Grove, near Stourbridge, Worcester- shire. 1866. §Greaves, Charles Augustus, M.B., LL.B. 32 Friar-gate, Derby. 1873. {Greaves, James H., C.E, Albert-buildings, Queen Victoria-street, London, E.C. 1869. §Greaves, William. Wellington-circus, Nottingham. 1872. §Greaves, William. 11 John-street, Bedford-row, London, W.C. 1872. *Grece, Clair J., LL.D. Redhill, Surrey. 1858. *Greenhalgh, Thomas. Thornydikes, Sharples, near Bolton-le-Moors. 1863. {Greenwell, G. E. Poynton, Cheshire. 1875. tGreenwood, Frederick. School of Medicine, Leeds. 1877. §Greenwood, Holmes, 78 King-street, Accrington. 1862. *Greenwood, Henry. 32 Castle-street, and the Woodlands, Anfield- road, Anfield, Liverpool. 1849, {Greenwood, William. Stones, Todmorden. 1861. *Gree, Rosert Purrirs, F.G.S., F.R.A.S. Coles Park, Bunting- ford, Herts. 1833. Gregg, T. H. 22 Ironmonger-lane, Cheapside, London, E.C. 1860. {Grrcor, Rey. Watrer, M.A. Pitsligo, Rosehearty, Aberdeen- shire. 1868. {Gregory, Charles Hutton, C.E. 1 Delahay-street, Westminster, S.W. 1861. §Gregson, Samuel Leigh. Aigburth-road, Liverpool. 1875. {Grenfell, J. Granville, B.A., F.G.S. 5 Albert-villas, Clifton, Bristol. *GRESWELL, Rev. Ricuarp, M.A., F.R.S., F.R.G.S. 39 St. Giles’s- street, Oxford. 1869, {Grey, Sir Gerorer, F.R.G.S. Belgrave-mansions, Grosyenor- gardens, London, 8.W. 1875. tGrey, Mrs. Maria G. 18 Cadogan-place, London, S.W. 1871. *Grierson, Samuel. Medical Superintendent of the District Asylum, Melrose, N.B. 1859. {Grrerson, Toomas Boyiz, M.D. Thornhill, Dumfriesshire. 1875. §Grieve, David, F.R.S.E. Hobart House, Dalkeith. 1870. {Grieve, John, M.D. 21 Lynedock-street, Glasgow. 1878. §Griffin, Robert, M.A., LL.D. Trinity College, Dublin. Griffith, Rev. C. T., D.D. Elm, near Frome, Somerset. 1859. *GrirritH, GrorGs, M.A., F.C.S. Harrow. Griffith, George R. Fitzwilliam-place, Dublin. 1868, ee Rev. Joun, M.A., D.C.L. Findon Rectory, Worthing, ussex. 1870. {Griffith, N. R. The Coppa, Mold, North Wales. 1870. {Griffith, Rev. Henry, F.G.S. Barnet, Herts. 1847, {Griffith, Thomas. Bradford-street, Birmingham, Grirritus, Rey. Jonny, M.A. Wadham College, Oxford. D 34 | LIST OF MEMBERS. Year of Election. 1875. {Grignon, James, H.M. Consul at Riga. Riga. 1870. {Grimsdale, T. F., M.D. 29 Rodney-street, Liverpool. 1842. Grimshaw, Samuel, M.A. Errwod, Buxton. 1864. {Groom-Naprrer, CHArtes Orriny, F.G.8. 18 Elgin-road, St. Peter’s Park, London, N. W. 1869, §Grote, Arthur, F.L.S., F.G.S. 20 Cork-street, Burlington-ardens, London, W. Grove, The Hon, Sir Wirttam Rosert, Knt., M.A., Ph.D., F.R.S. 115 Harley-street, London, W. 1863. *Groves, Toomas B., F.C.S. 80 St. Mary-street, Weymouth. 1869. FOR, ; Howarp, F.R.A.S. 40 Leinster-square, Rathmines, Dublin. 1872. {Griineisen, Sane Lewis, F.R.G.S. 16 Surrey-street, Strand, Lon- don, W.C. Guest, Edwin, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S., Master of Caius College, Cam- Eee Caius Lodge, Cambridge; and Sandford Park, Oxford- shire. 1867. {Guild, John. Bayfield, West Ferry, Dundee. Guinness, Henry. 17 College-green, Dublin, 1842. Guinness, Richard Seymour. 17 College-green, Dublin. 1856. *Guisn, Sir Wirttam VERNON, Bart., F.G.8., F.L.S. Elmore Court, near Gloucester. 1862. {Gunn, John, M.A., F.G.S. Irstedd Rectory, Norwich. 1877. §Gunn, William, F.G.S. Barnard Castle, Darlington. 1866. {Gtnrupr, ArpertO. L.G., M.A., M.D., Ph.D., F.R.S., Keeper of the Zoological Collections in the British Museum. British Museum, London, W.C. 18€8. *Gurney, John. Sprouston Hall, Norwich. 1860, *Gurney, Samvet, F.L.S., F.R.G.S. 29 Hanover-terrace, Regent's Park, London, N.W. *Gutch, John James. Holgate Lodge, York. 1876. {Guthrie, Francis. Cape Town, Cape of Good Hope. 1859. {Gurnrin, Frepericx, B,A., F.RS. L. & E., Professor of Physics in the Royal School of Mines. 24 Stanley-crescent, Notting Hill, London, W. 1857. {Gwynne, Rev. John. Tullyagnish, Letterkenny, Strabane, Ireland. 1876. {Gwyther, R. F. Owens College, Manchester. Hackett, Michael. Brooklawn, Chapelizod, Dublin. 1865. {Hackney, William. 9 Victoria~chambers, Victoria-street, London, , S.W. 1866. *Hadden, Frederick J. 3 Park-terrace, Nottingham, 1866, {Haddon, Henry. Lenton Field, Nottingham. Haden, G. N. Trowbridge, Wiltshire. 1842. Hadfield, George. Victoria~park, Manchester. 1870. {Hadivan, Isaac. 3 Huskisson-street, Liverpool. 1848. {Hadland, William Jenkins. Banbury, Oxfordshire. 1870, {Haigh, George. Waterloo, Liverpool. *Hailstone, Edward, F.S.A. Walton Hall, Wakefield, Yorkshire. 1869. {Hake, R. ©. Grasmere Lodge, Addison-road, Kensington, Lon- don, W. 1875.§$Hale, Rev. Edward, M.A., F.G.S., F.R.G.S. Eton College, Windsor. 1870, {Halhead, W. B. 7 Parkfield-road, Liverpool. Hatrax, The Right Hon. Viscount. 10 Belgrave-square, London, S.W.; and Hickleston Hall, Doncaster. 1872, {FPall, Dr. Alfred. 30 Old Steine, Brighton. 1854, *Hart, Hucn Ferere, F.G.S. Greenheys, Wallasey, Birkenhead. LIST OF MEMBERS, Biy Year of ‘Election. 1859. {Hall, John Frederic. Ellerker House, Richmond, Surrey, 1872. *Hall, Captain Marshall. Scientific Club, Savile-row, London, W. *Hall, Thomas B, Australia. (Care of J. P. Hall, Esq., Crane House, Great Yarmouth.) 1866, *Hart, Townsuenp M.,F.G.S.__ Pilton, Barnstaple. 1860. §Hall, Walter. 11 Pier-road, Erith. 1873. §Haurerr, T. G. P., M.A. Claverton Lodge, Bath. 1868, *Hatrerr, Wro11am Henry, F.LS. Buckingham House, Marine Parade, Brighton. Halsall, Edward. 4 Somerset-street, Kingsdown, Bristol. 1858. *Hambly, Charles Hambly Burbridge, F.G.8. The Leys, Barrow-on- Soar, near Loughborough. 1866. §Hamiiron, ArcuiBaLp, F.G.S. South Barrow, Bromley, Kent. 1865.§§Hamilton, Gilbert. Leicester House, Kenilworth-road, Leamine- ton. Haminron, The Very Rev. Henry Parr, Dean of Salisbury, M.A., F.RS. L. & E., F.G.S., F.R.A.S. Salisbury. 1869. {Hamilton, John, F.G.S. Fyne Court, Bridgewater. 1869. §Hamilton, Roland. Oriental Club, Hanover-square, London, W. 1851. {Hammond, C. C. Lower Brook-street, Ipswich. 1878, §Hanagan, Anthony. Luckington, Dalkey. 1878. §Hance, Edward M. 24 Church-road, Wavertree, Liverpool. 1875. {Hancock, C. F., jun, M.A. Royal Institution, Albemarle-street, London, W. 1863. {Hancock, John. 4 St. Mary’s-terrace, Newcastle-on-Tyne. 1850, {Hancock, John, J.P. The Manor House, Lurgan, Oo. Armagh. 1861, {Hancock, Walker. 10 Upper Chadwell-street, Pentonville, London, N. ~ 1857. {Hancock, William J. 23 Synnot-place, Dublin. 1847, {Hancock, W. Neirson, LL.D., MR.LA. 64 Upper Gardiner- street, Dublin. 1876. §Hancock, Mrs. \. Neilson. 64 Upper Gardiner-street, Dublin. 1865. {Hands, M. Coventry Handyside, P. D., M.D., F.R.S.E. Edinburgh. 1867. {Hannah, Rey. John, D.C.L. The Vicarage, Brighton. 1859, {Hannay, John. Montcoffer House, Aberdeen. 1853, {Hansell, Thomas T. 2 Charlotte-street, Sculcoates, Hull. “Harcourt, A. G. Vurnoy, M.A., F.RS., F.C.S. 3 Norham-gar- dens, Oxford. Harcourt, Egerton V. Vernon, M.A., F.G.S, Whitwell Hall, York- shire. 1865. {Harding, Charles. Harborne Heath, Birmingham, 1869. {Harding, Joseph. Millbrooke House, Exeter. 1877. §Harding, Stephen. Bower Ashton, Clifton, Bristol. 1869, {Harding, William D. Islington Lodge, King’s Lynn, Norfolk. 1874, {Hardman, E. T., F.C.S. 14 Hume street, Dublin. 1872, {Hardwicke, Mrs. 192 Piccadilly, London, W. *Harn, CHARLES Joun, M.D., Professor of Clinical Medicine in Uni- versity College, London. 57 Brook-street, Grosvenor-square, London, W. Harford, Summers. Haverfordwest. 1858, {Hargrave, James. Burley, near Leeds. 1876. {Harker, Allen. 17 Southgate-street, Gloucester, , 1878. *Harlness, H. W. Sacramento, California. 1871. §Harkness, William. Laboratory, Somerset House, London, W.C. 1875, *Harland, Rev. Albert Augustus, M.A.,F.S.A. The Vicarage, Hare- field, Middlesex. D2 36. LIST OF MEMBERS. Year of lection, 1877. 1862. 1862, 1861. 4868. 1872. 1857, 4874. *Harland, Henry Seaton. Brompton, Wykeham Station, York. *Hartey, Guorer, M.D., F.R.S., F.C.S. 25 Harley-street, London, W. *Harley, John. Ross Hall, near Shrewsbury. *Hurrey, Rev. Rosert, F.R.S., F.R.A.S. Mill Hill School, Mid- dlesex; and Burton Bank, Mill Hill, Middlesex, N. W. tHarman, H. W., C.E. 16 Booth-street, Manchester. *Harmer, F. W., F.G.S. Oakland House, Cringleford, Norwich. eee Rey. William, M.A., F.C.P.S. Clayhanger Rectory, iverton. *THarvis, Alfred. Oxton Hall, Tadcaster. » *Harris, Alfred, jun. Lunefield, Kirkby-Lonsdale, Westmoreland. . tHarris, Grorer, F.S.A. Iselipps Manor, Northolt, Southall, Mid- dlesex. . *Harris, Herbert W. 124 Lower Baggot-street, Dublin. 3. {Harris, T. W. Grange, Middlesbrough-on-Tees. . tHarris, W. W. Oak-villas, Bradford, Yorkshire. . tHarrison, Rev. Francis, M.A. Oriel College, Oxford. . {Harrison, George. Barnsley, Yorkshire. 3. §Harrison, George, Ph.D., F.L.S., F.C.S. 14 St. James’s-row, Sheffield. . tHarrison, G. D. B. 8 Beaufort-road, Clifton, Bristol. 8. *Harrisoy, James Park, M.A. Cintra Park Villa, Upper Norwood, 5.1. . tHTarrison, Recrnatp. 51 Rodney-street, Liverpool. . tHarrison, Robert. 36 George-street, Hull. . tHarrison, T. E. Engineers’ Office, Central Station, Newcastle-on- Tyne. . *Harrison, William, F.S.A., F.G.S. Samlesbury Hall, near Preston, Lancashire. . tIlarrowny, The Right Hon. Duptny Ryper, Karl of, K.G., D.C.L., F.R.S., F.R.G.S. 39 Grosvenor-squaye, London, W.; and Sandon Hall, Lichfield. 59, *Hart, Charles. Harborne Hall, Birmingham. . *Hart, Thomas. Bank View, 33 Preston New-road, Blackburn. 5. §Hart, W. E. Kilderry, near Londonderry. . { Hartland, F. Dixon, F.S.A., F.R.GS. The Oaklands, near Chelten- ham. Tlartley, James. Sunderland. 71. {Iartley, Walter Noel, F.0.S. King’s College, London, W.C. 54. (Harrnup, Jowy, F.R.A.S. Liverpool Observatory, Bidston, Birkenhead. . tITarvey, Alexander, 4 South Wellington-place, Glasgow. . tHarvey, Enoch. Riversdale-road, Aigburth, Liverpool. *Harvey, Joseph Charles. Knockrea, Douglas-road, Cork. Harvey, J. R., M.D. St. Patrick’s-place, Cork. . §Harvey, R. J.. M.D. 7 Upper Merrion-street, Dublin. 2. *IHarwood, John, jun. Woodside Mills, Bolton-le-Moors. . tHasting, G. W. Barnard’s Green House, Malvern. Hastings, Rev. H. 8. Martley Rectory, Woyrcester. 7. {Hastings. W. Huddersfield. *Hatton, James. Richmond House, Higher Broughton, Manchester. t{Haventon, Rey. Samvrt, M.A., M.D., D.C.L., F.R.S., M.R.LA., F.G.S., Professor of Geology in the University of Dublin. Trinity College, Dublin. {Hawkins, B. Waterhouse, F.G.S. Century Club, East Fifteenth- street, New York, LIST OF MEMBERS. ° 37 Year of Election. 1872. *Hawkshaw, Henry Paul. 20 King-street, St. James’s, London, S.W *HAWKsHAW, Sir Jonny, C.E., F.R.S., F.G.S., F.R.G.S. Ilollycombe, Liphook, Petersfield ; and 33 Great George-street, London, 8S. W.- 1864. *Hawkshaw, John Clarke, M.A., F.G.S. 25 Cornwall-gardens, South Kensington, 8.W.; and 33 Great George-street, London, S.W. 1868.§§Hawxstey, Tuomas, C.E.,F.R.S., F.G.S. 30 Great George-street, London, 8. W. 1863. {Hawthorn, William. The Cottage, Benwell, Newcastle-upon-Tyne. 1859. {Hay, Sir Andrew Leith, Bart. Rannes, Aberdeenshire. 1877.§§Hay, Arthur J. Lerwick, Shetland. 1861. *Hay, Rear-Admiral the Right Hon. Sir Joun C. D., Bart, C.B., M.P., D.C.L., F.R.S. 108 St. George’s-square, London, 8. W. 1858. {Hay, Samuel. Albion-place, Leeds. 1867. tHay, William. 21 Magdalen-yard-road, Dundee. 1857, {Hayden, Thomas, M.D. 30 Harcourt-street, Dublin. 1873, *Hayes, Rey. William A., M.A. 8 Mountjoy-place, Dublin. 1869. {Hayward, J. High-street, Exeter. 1858. *Haywarp, Roprrr Batpwiy, M.A., F.R.S. The Park, Harrow. 1851.§§Hean, Jeremrsan, C.E., F.C.S. Middlesbrough, Yorkshire. 1869. {Head, R. T. The Briars, Alphington, Exeter. 1869. tHead, W. R. Bedford-circus, Exeter. 1863. {Heald, Joseph. 22 Leazes-terrace, Newcastle-on-Tyne. 1872. { Healey, C. E. H. Chadwyck. 8 Albert-mansions, Victoria-strect, London, 8.1. 1871. §Healey, George. Matson’s, Windermere. 1861. *Heape, Benjamin. Northwood, Prestwich, near Manchester. 1877.§§Hearder, Henry Pollington. Westwell-street, Plymouth. 1865. {Hearder, William. Rocombe, Torquay. 1877.§§Hearder, William Keep, F.S.A. 195 Union-street, Plymouth. 1866. {Heath, Rev. D. J. Esher, Surrey. 18638. {Heath, G. Y., M.D. Westgate-street, Newcastle-on-Tyne. 1861. §HxearHrrep, W. E., F.C.S., F.R.G.S., F.R.S.E. - 20 King-street, St. James’s, London, 8.W. 1865. {Heaton, Harry. Harborne House, Harborne, near Birmingham. 1858. *Hxaton, JouHn Draxty, M.D., F.R.C.P. Claremont, Leeds. 1865. { Heaton, Ralph. Harborne Lodge, near Birmingham. 1833. tHeavisrpe, Rey. Canon J. W. L., M.A. The Close, Norwich. 1855. {Hxcror, James, M.D., F.R.S., F.G.S., F.8.G.8., Geological Survey of New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand. 1867. {Heppxs, M. Fosrer, M.D., Professor of Chemistry in the University of St. Andrews, N.B. 1869. tHedgeland, Rev. W. J. 21 Mount Radford, Exeter. 1863. tHedley, Thomas. Cox Lodge, near Newcastle-on-Tyne. 1857. *Hemans, George William, C.E., M.R.LA., F.G.S. 1 Westminster- chambers, Victoria-street, London, 8. W. 1867. {Henderson, Alexander. Dundee. 1845. {Henderson, Andrew. 120 Gloucester-place, Portman-square, Lon- don, W. 1873. *Henderson, A. L. 49 King William-street, London, E.C. 1874. t{Henderson, James Alexander. Norwood Tower, Belfast. _ 1876. *Henderson, William, Williamfield, Irvine, N.B. 1873. *Hunperson, W. D. 12 Victoria-street, Belfast. 1856, {Hennessy, Henry G., F.R.S., M.R.LA., Professor of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics in the Royal College of Science for Ireland. 3 Idrone-terrace, Blackrock, Co. Dublin. LIST OF MEMBERS. Year of Election, 1857. {Hennessy, John Pope, Governor of the Bahamas. Government 1873. 1874. House, Nassau. *Henrici, Olaus M. F. E., Ph.D., F.R.S., Professor of Mathematics in University College, London. 21 South-yillas, Camden- square, London, N.W. Henry, Franklin. Portland-street, Manchester. Henry, J. Snowdon. East Dene, Bonchurch, Isle of Wight. Henry, Mitchell, M.P, Stratheden House, Hyde Park, London, We {Heyry, Rev. P. Suurpam, D.D., M.R.1.A., President, Queen’s College, Belfast. *Henry, WILLIAM Cuartes, M.D., F.R.S., F.G.S., F.R.G.S., F.C.8. Haffield, near Ledbury, Herefordshire. {Henty, William. Norfolk-terrace, Brighton. *Hepbum, J. Gotch, LL.B., F.C.S. Sideup-place, Sidcup, Kent, tHepburn, Robert. 9 Portland-place, London, W, Hepburn, Thomas. Clapham, London, 8.W. {Hepburn, Thomas H. St. Mary’s Cray, Kent. Hepworth, John Mason. Ackworth, Yorkshire. . {Hepworth, Rev. Robert. .2 St. James’s-square, Cheltenham. *Herbert, Thomas, The Park, Nottingham. {Herrick, Perry. Bean Manor Park, Loughborough. *HerscHet, Professor ALEXANDER §., B.A., F.R.A.S. College of Science, Newcastle-on-Tyne. . §Herschel, Major John, R.E., F.R.S. Mussoorie, N. W. P. India. (Care of Messrs. H. Robertson & Co., 5 Crosby-square, London, E.C.) {Heslop, Dr. Birmingham. {Heugh, John. Gaunt’s House, Wimborne, Dorset. Hey, Rey. William, M.A., F.C.P.S. Clifton, York, “Heymann, Albert. West Bridgford, Nottinghamshire, {Heymann, L. West Bridgford, Nottinghamshire. *Heywood, Arthur Henry. Elleray, Windermere. *Hrywoop, Jamas, F.R.S., ¥.G.S., F.S.A., F.R.G.S., F.S.S. 26 Ken- sington Palace-gardens, London, W. *Heywood, Oliver. Claremont, Manchester. . Heywood, Thomas Percival. Claremont, Manchester. Naas Henry, M.D., F.G.S. Heriot House, Hendon, Middlesex, v.W. §Hicks, W. M. St. John’s College, Cambridge. “Iirern, W. P., M.A. Castle House, Barnstaple. *Higein, Edward. Troston Lodge, near Bury St. Edmunds. *Higgin, James, Lancaster-avenue, Fennel-street, Manchester. Higginbotham, Samuel. 4 Springfield-court, Queen-street, Glas- pow. {Higginbottom, John, F.R.S., F.R.C.S. Gill-street, Nottingham. tHiggins, Charles Hayes, M.D., M.R.C.P., F.R.C.S., F.R.S.E. Alfred House, Birkenhead. {Hiteers, Cryment, B.A., F.C.8. 103 Holland-road, Kensington, London, W. tHicerns, Rev. Huyry H., M.A. The Asylum, Rainhill, Liver- pool. *Higgins, James. Stocks House, Cheetham, Manchester. » TAgginson, Alfred. 44 Upper Parliament-street, Liverpool. Hildyard, Rey. James, B.D., F.C.P.S. Ingoldsby, near Grantham, Lincolnshire. Hill, Arthur. Bruce Castle, Tottenham, Middlesex, Year of Election 1872. 1857, 1871. 1864. 1876. 1865. 1871. 1858. 1870. 1865, 1863. 1861. 1858. 1861. 1856, 1870. 1864. 1864. 1864. 1866, 1877.5 1877 1876. 1852. 1863. 1873. 1873. 1875. 1865. 1865. 1830. 1865. 1860. 1876. 1854. 1873. 1856, 1865, 1866, 1873. LIST OF MEMBERS. 89 §Hill, Charles. Rockhurst, West Hoathley, East Grinstead. *Hill, Rev. Edward, M.A., F.G.S. Sheering Rectory, Harlow. §Hill, John, 0.E., M.R.LA., F.R.G.S.I. County Surveyor’s Office, Ennis, Ireland. tHill, Lawrence. The Knowe, Greenock. *Hi1, Sir Rowranp, K.O.B., D.C.L., F.R.8., F.R.A.S. Hampstead, London, N.W. {Mill, William. Combe Hay, Bristol. Hill, William H. Barlanark, Shettleston, N.B. {Hills, F.C. Chemical Works, Deptford, Kent, S.E. *Hills, Thomas Hyde. 338 Oxtford-street, London, W. tHincxs, Rev. THomas, B.A., F.R.S. Stancliff House, Clevedon, Somerset. {Hinde, G. J. Buenos Ayres. Hindley, Rev. H. J. Edlington, Lincolnshire. *Hindmarsh, Luke. Alnbank House, Alnwick. {Hinds, James, M.D. Queen’s College, Birmingham. tHinds, William, M.D. Parade, Birmingham. *Hinmers, William. Cleveland House, Birkdale, Southport, {Hirst, John, jun. Dobcross, near Manchester. *Hirst, T. Arncuer, Ph, D., F.R.S., F.R.A.S. Royal Naval College, eo ah hae S.E.; and Athenzeum Club, Pall Mall, London, .W. {Hitch, Samuel, M.D. Sandywell Park, Gloucestershire. tHitchman, William, M.D., LL.D., F.L.S. 29 Erskine-street, Liverpool. *Hoare, Rev. George Tooker. Godstone Rectory, Redhill. Hoare, J. Gurney. Hampstead, London, N.W. {Hobhouse, Arthur Fane. 24 Oadogan-place, London, S.W. tHobhouse, Charles Parry. 24 Cadogan-place, London, 8.W. tHobhouse, Henry William. 24 Cadogan-place, London, 8.W. tHocxry, Caries, M.D. 8 Avenue-road, St. John’s Wood, Lon- don, N.W. §Hockin, Edward. Poughill, Stratton, Cornwall. ' . §Hodge, Rev. John Mackey, M.A. 38 Tavistock-place, Plymouth, tHodges, Frederick W. Queen’s College, Belfast. tHodges, John F., M.D., F.C.S., Professor of Agriculture in Queen’s College, Belfast. *Hopexin, THomas. Benwell Dene, Newcastle-on-Tyne. *Hodgson, George. Thornton-road, Bradford, Yorkshire. tHodgson, James. Oakfield, Manningham, Bradford, Yorkshire. *Hodgson, Kirkman Daniel, M.P. 67 Brook-street, London, W. tHodgson, Robert. Whitburn, Sunderland. tHodgson, R. W. North Dene, Gateshead. tHodgson, W. B., LL.D., F.R.A.S., Professor of Commercial and Po- litical Economy in the University of Edinburgh. *Hormany, Avevst Winner, M.D., LL.D., Ph.D., F.R.S., F.C.S. 10 Dorotheen Strasse, Berlin. tHogan, Rev. A. R., M.A. Watlington Vicarage, Oxfordshire, {Hogg, Robert. 54 Jane-street, Glasgow. *Holeroft, George. Byron’s-court, St. Mary’s-gate, Manchester, *Holden, Isaac. Oakworth House, near Keighley, Yorkshire. tHolland, Henry. Dumbleton, Evesham. *Holland, Philip H. Home Office, London, S.W. tHolliday, William. New-street, Birmingham. *Holmes, Charles. 59 London-road, Derby. tHolmes, J. R. Southbrook Lodge, Bradford, Yorkshire. 40 Year of LIST OF MEMBERS. lection. 1876. 1876, 1870, 1875. 1847, 1865. 1877. 1856. 1842. 1869. 1865. 1870. 1871. 1858. 1876. 1875, 1854, 1856, 1868. 1858. 1859. 1863. 1876. 1857, 1868. 1865, 1863. 1854, 1870, *Holms, James. Hope Park, Partick, near Glasgow. {Holms, Colonel William, M.P. 95 Cromwell-road, South Kensing- ton, London, S.W. {Holt, William D. 23 Edge-lane, Liverpool. *Hone, Nathaniel, M.A., M.R.LA. Bank of Ireland, Dublin. *Hood, John. The Elms, Cotham Hill, Bristol. tHooxer, Sir JosrpH Datron, K.O.S.1., K.C.B., M.D., D.C.L., LL.D., F.R.S., V.P.L.S., F.G.S., F.R.G.S. Royal Gardens, Kew, Surrey. *Hooper, John P, The Hut, Mitcham Common, Surrey. *“Hooper, Samuel F. Beechwood, Clapham Common, Surrey, S.W tHooton, Jonathan. 80 Great Ducie-street, Manchester. Hope, Thomas Arthur. Stanton, Bebington, Cheshire. {Hope, William, V.C. Parsloes, Barking, Essex. {Hopkins, J. S. Jesmond Grove, Edgbaston, Birmingham. “Hopkinson, Jonny, F.R.S. 78 Holland-road, Kensington, Lon- don, W. §Hopxrnson, Joun, F.1.S., F.G.8. Wansford House, Watford. {Hopkinson, Joseph, jun. Britannia Works, Huddersfield. Hornby, Hugh. Sandown, Liverpool. *Horne, Robert R. 150 Hope-street, Glasrow. *Horniman, F. J. Surrey House, Forest Hill, London, S.E. {Horsfall, Thomas Berry. Bellamour Park, Rugeley. tHorsley, John H. 1 Ormond-terrace, Cheltenham. {Hotson, W. C. Upper King-street, Norwich. Hoventon, The Right Hon. Lord, M.A., D.C.L., F.R.S., F.R.G.S. 16 Upper Brook-street, London, W. tHounsfield, James. Hemsworth, Pontefract. Tiovenden, W. F., M.A. Bath. { Howard, Captain John Henry, R.N. The Deanery, Lichfield. tHoward, Philip Henry. Corby Castle, Carlisle. THowatt, James. 146 Buchanan-street, Glasgow. {Howell, Henry H., F.G.S. Museum of Practical Geology, Jermyn- street, London, S.W. {Howe t, Rev. Canon Hixps. Drayton Rectory, near Norwich. *How ert, Rey. Freperick, F.R.A.S. East Tisted Rectory, Alton, Hants. {Howorrn, H. H. Derby House, Eccles, Manchester. tHowson, The Very Rev. J. S., D.D., Dean of Chester. Chester. tHubback, Joseph. 1 Brunswick-street, Liverpool. . *Hupson, Henry, M.D., M.R.LA. Glenville, Fermoy, Co. Cork. . §Hudson, Robert, F.R.S., F.G.S., F.L.8. Clapham Common, London, S. W, . t{Hudson, Williom H.H., M.A. 19 Bennet’s-hill, Doctors’ Commons, London, E.C.; and St. John’s College, Cambridge. . *Hueerns, Writrram, D.C.L. Oxon., LL.D. Camb., F.R.S., F.R.A.S. Upper Tulse Hill, Brixton, London, 8. W. . tHuggon, William. 30 Park-row, Leeds. . “Hughes, George Pringle, J.P. Middleton Hall, Wooler, Northum- berland. . “Hughes, Lewis. Fenwick-court, Liverpool. . “Hughes, Thomas Edward. The Priory, Repton, Burton-on- Trent. . §Hueuss, T. M‘K., M.A., F.G.S., Woodwardian Professor of Geology in the University of Cambridge. » {Hughes, T. W. 4 Hawthorn-terrace, Newcastle-on-Tyne. LIST OF MEMBERS, 4} Year of Election. 1865. tHughes, W. R., F.L.S., Treasurer of the Borough of Birmingham. Birmingham. 1867, § Hutt, EDWARD, M.A., F.R.S., F.G.S., Director of the Geological Survey of Ireland, and Professor of Geology i in the Royal College of Science. 14 Hume-street, Dublin. *Hulse, Sir Edward, Bart., D.C. L. 47 Portland-place, London, W. ; ' and Breamore House, Salisbury. 1861. {Humx, Rey. Canon Asranam, D. 10.L,, LL.D., F.A. \ All cols Vicarage, Rupert-lane, Liverpool. 1856. {Humphries, David James. 1 Keynsham-parade, Cheltenham. 1878. §Humphreys, H. Castle-square, Carnarvon. 1862, *Humpnry, ‘GuorcE Morray, M.D., F.R.S., Professor of Anatomy in the University of Cambridge. Grove Lodge, Cambridge. 1877. *Hunt, Arthur Roope, M.A., EGS. Southwood, "Torquay. 1865. {Hunt, J. P. Gospel Oak. Works, Tipton. 1840. {Hunt, Roper, F.R.S., Keeper of the Mining Records. Museum of Practical Geology, Jermyn-street, London, 8. W. 1864, {Hunt, W. 72 Pulteney-street, Bath. 1875. *Hunt, William. The Woodlands, Tyndall’s Park, Clifton, Bristol. . Hunter, Andrew Galloway. Denholm, Hawick, N.B. 1868. {Hunter, Christopher. Aliiance Insurance Office, North Shields, 1867. {Hunter, David. Blackness, Dundee. 1869, *Hunter, Rev. Robert, F.G.S. 9 Mecklenburgh-street, London, W.C. 1863. {Huntsman, Benjamin. West Retford Hall, Retford. 1875.§§Hurnard, James. Lexden, Colchester, Essex. 1869, {Hurst, George. Bedford. 1861. *Hurst, William John. Drumaness Mills, Ballynahinch, Lisburn, Treland. 1870, {Hurter, Dr. Ferdinand. Appleton, Widnes, near Warrington. Husband, William Dalla. Coney-street, York. 1876, {Hutchinson, John, 22 Hamilton Park-terrace, Glasgow. -1874. {Hutchinson, Thomas J., F.R.G.S. Chimoo Cottage, Mill Till, London, N.W. 1876. {Hutchison, Peter. 28 Berkeley-terrace, Glasrow- 1868. *Hutchison, Robert, F.R.S.E. 29 Chester-street, Edinburgh. 1863. | Hutt, The Right Hon. Sir W., K.C.B. Gibside, Gateshead. Hutton, Crompton. Putney Park, Surrey, S.W. 1864, *Hutton, Darnton. (Care of Arthur Lupton, Esq., Headingley, near Leeds.) Hutton, Henry. Edenfield, Dundrum, Co. Dublin. 1857. {Hutton, Henry D. 10 Lower Mountjoy-street, Dublin. 1861. *Hurron, T. Maxwert. Summerhill, Dublin. 1852. {Huxtny, THomas Henry, Ph.D., LL.D., Sec. R.S., F.L.S., F.G.S., Professor of Natural History in the Royal School of Mines. 4 Marlborough-place, London, N.W. Hyde, Edward. Dukinfield, near Manchester. 1871. *Hyett, Francis A. Painswick House, Stroud, Gloucestershire. Ihne, William, Ph.D. Heidelberg. 1875. §Ikin, J. I. 19 Park-place, Leeds. 1861. {Iles, Rey. J. H. Rectory, Wolverhampton. 1858. {Ingham, Henry. Wortley, near Leeds. 1876. §Inclis, Anthony. Broomhill, Partick, Glasgow. 1871. tIveris, The Right Hon. Jonny, D.C.L, LL.D., Lord Justice General of Scotland. Edinburgh. 1876, {Inglis, John, jun. Prince’s-terrace, Dowanhill, Glasgow. 42 LIST OF MEMBERS. Year of Election. 1858. *Ingram, Hugo Francis Meynell. Temple Newsam, Leeds. 1852. {Ineram, J. K., LL.D., M.R.LA., Regius Professor of Greek in the University of Dublin. 2 Wellington-road, Dublin. 1870. *Inman, William. Upton Manor, Liverpool. Treland, R. S., M.D. 121 Stephen’s-green, Dublin. 1857. tIrvine, Hans, M.A., M.B. 1 Rutland-square, Dublin. 1862. fIseuin, J. F., M.A., F.G.S. 52 Stockwell Park-road, London,. S.W 1863. “Ivory, Thomas. 23 Walker-street, Edinburgh. 1865. {Jabet, George. Wellington-road, Handsworth, Birmingham, 1870. tJack, James. 26 Abercromby-square, Liverpool. 1859. tJack, John, M.A. Belhelvie-by-Whitecairns, Aberdeenshire. 1876. {Jack, William. 19 Lansdowne-road, Notting Hill, London, W. 1866. {Jackson, H. W., F.R.A.S., F.G.S. 15 The Terrace, High-road, Lewisham, 5.E. 1869. §Jackson, Moses. The Vale, Ramsgate. Jackson, Professor Thomas, LL.D. St. Andrew’s, Scotland. 1863. *Jackson-Gwilt, Mrs. H. Moonbeam Villa, The Grove, New Wim- bledon, London, 8. W. 1852. {Jacoss, BeruEet. 40 George-street, Hull. 1874, *Jaffe, John. Cambridge Villa, Strandtown, near Belfast. 1865. *Jaffray, John. Park-grove, Edgbaston, Birmingham. 1872. tJames, Christopher. 8 Laurence Pountney Hill, London, E.C. 1860. {James, Edward H. Woodside, Plymouth. 1863. *Jamus, Sir Waxrer, Bart., F.G.S. 6 Whitehall-gardens, London, Shik 1858. {James, William C. Woodside, Plymouth. 1876.§§Jamieson, J. L. K. The Mansion House, Govan, Glasgow. 1876. {Jamieson, Rey. Dr. R. 156 Randolph-terrace, Glasgow. 1859. *Jamieson, Thomas F., F.G.S. Ellon, Aberdeenshire. 1850. {Jardine, Alexander. Jardine Hall, Lockerby, Dumfriesshire. 1870. {Jardine, Edward. Beach Lawn, Waterloo, Liverpool. 1853. *Jarratt, Rey. Canon J., M.A. North Cave, near Brough, York- shire. Jarrett, Rey. THomas, M.A., Professor of Arabic in the University of Cambridge. Trunch, Norfolk. 1870. §Jarrold, John James. London-street, Norwich. 1862. {Jeakes, Rev. James, M.A. 54 Argyll-road, Kensington, W. Jebb, Rey. John. Peterstow Rectory, Ross, Herefordshire. 1868. {Jecks, Charles. 26 Langham-place, Northampton. 1856. {Jeffery, Henry M., M.A. 438 Hich-street, Cheltenham. 1855. *Jeffray, John. Cardowan House, Millerston, Glasgow. 1867. par Towel, M.A., F.R.A.S. 5 Brick-court, Temple, London, 1861. *Jurrreys, J. Gwyn, LL.D., F.R.S., F.L.S,, Treas, G.S., F.R.G.S. Ware Priory, Herts. 1852. ibaa Rey. Joun H., B.D., M.R.LA. 64 Lower Leeson-street, ublin. 1862. §Jenkin, H. C. Freemine, F.R.S. M.I.C.E., Professor of Civil Engineering in the University of Edinburgh. 3 Great Stuart- street, Edinburgh. 1873. Senet. Major-General J. J. 14 St. James’s-square, London, J ennette, Matthew. 106 Conway-street, Birkenhead. 1852. {Jennings, Francis M., F.G.S.,M.R.LA. Brown-street, Cork. 1872. {Jemnings, W. Grand Hotel, Brighton. LIST OF MEMBERS. 43 Year of Election. 1878. §Jephson, Henry L. Chief Secretary's Office, The Castle, Dublin. *Jerram, Rey. 8. John, M.A. Chobham Vicarage, near Bagshot Surrey. 1872. {Jesson, Thomas. 7 Upper Wimpole-street, Cavendish-square London, W. Jessop, William, jun. Butterley Hall, Derbyshire. 1870. *Jrvons, W. Stantny, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S., Professor of Political Economy in University College, London. 2 The Chestnuts, Branch Hill, Hampstead Heath, London, N.W. 1872. *Joad, George C. Oakfield, W imbledon, Surrey, S.W. 1871. *Johnson, David, F.0.8., F.G.8S. Irvon V illa, Grosyenor-road, Wrexham. 1865. *Johnson, G. J. 36 Waterloo-street, Birmingham. 1875. §Johnson, James Henry, F.G.8. 3 Queen’s-road, Southport. 1866. {Johnson, John. Knighton Fields, Leicester. 1866. {Johnson, John G. 18a Basinghall-street, London, E.C. 1872. {Johnson, J.T. 27 Dale-street, Manchester. 1861, {Johnson, Richard. 27 Dale-street, Manchester. 1870. §Johnson, Richard C., F.R.A.S. Higher Bebington Hall, Birken- head, 1863. {Johnson, R. 8S. Hanwell, Fence Houses, Durham. “Johnson, Thomas. The Hermitage, Frodsham, Cheshire. 1861. {Johnson, William Beckett. Woodlands Bank, near Altrincham. 1871. {Johnston, A. Keith, F.R.G.S, 1 Savile-row, London, W. 1864, {Johnston, David. 13 Marlborough-buildings, Bath. 1859. {Johnston, James. Newmill, Elgin, N.B. 1864, {Johnston, James. Manor House, Northend, Hampstead, London, N.W ? 1876. {Johnston, John, M.D. Edinburgh. “Johnstone, James. Alva House, Alva, by Stirling, N.B. 1864. {Johnstone, John, 1 Barnard-yvillas, Bath. 1876. {Johnstone, William. 5 Woodside-terrace, Glasgow. 1864, {Jolly, Thomas. Park View-villas, Bath. 187i. §Jolly, William (H.M. Inspector of Schools). Inverness, N.B. 1849. {Jones, Baynham. Selkirk Villa, Cheltenham. 1856. {Jones,C. W. 7 Grosyenor-place, Cheltenham. 1877. §Jones, Henry C., F.C.S. 166 Blackstock-road, London, N, 1865. {Jones, John. 49 Union-passage, Birmingham. “Jones, Robert. 2 Castle-street, Liverpool. 1873, {Jones, Theodore B. 1 Finsbury-cireus, London, E.C. 1860, {Jones, Tomas Rupert, F.R.S., F.G.S., Professor of Geology and Mineralogy, Royal Military and Staff Colleges, Sandhurst. 5 College-terrace, York Town, Surrey. 1847, {Jonzs, Tuomas Rymegr, F.R.S. 52 Cornwall-road, Westbourne Park, London, W. 1864,§§Jonzs, Sir WitLoveHsy, Bart., F.R.G.S. Cranmer Hall, Fakenham, Norfolk. 1875, *Jose, J. E. 3 Queen-square, Bristol. “Joule, Benjamin St. John B. 28 Leicester-street, Southport, Lan- cashire. 1842. *JouLz, James Prescorr, LL.D., F.R.S., F.C.S, 12 Wardle-road, Sale, near Manchester. 1847, {Jowrrr, Rev. B., M.A., Regius Professor of Greek in the University of Oxford. Balliol College, Oxford. 1858. {Jowett, John. Leeds. 1872, Woy esraay- Junior United Service Club, St. James's, London,. W. ad LIST OF MEMBERS. Year of Election. 1848, 1870, 1863. 1868, 1857. 1859, 1847, 1872. 1875. 1866. 1850. 1878. 1876. 1864. 1855. 1875. 1876, 1857. 1865. 1857. 1857, 1857. 1855, 1876. 1868. 4869, 1869. 1861. 1876. 1876. 1865. 1878. 1860. 1858. 1875, *Joy, Rey. Charles Ashfield. Grove Parsonage, Wantage, Berkshire. Joy, Rev. John Holmes, M.A. 3 Coloney-terrace, Tunbridge Wells. *Jubb, Abraham. Halifax. ~ tJ udd, John Wesley, F.R.S., F.G.S. 6 Manor-view, Brixton, London, S.W. tJukes, Rev. Andrew. Spring Bank, Hull. *Kaines, Joseph, M.A.,D.Sc. 13 Finsbury-place South, London, E.C. Kang, Sir Rosert, M.D., LL.D., F.R.S., M.R.LA., F.C.S., Prin- cipal of the Royal College of Cork. Fortland, Killiney, Co. Dublin. {Kavanach, James W. Gone Rathgar, Ireland. {Kay, David, *F.R.G.S. 19 Upper Phillimore-place, Kensington, London, W. Kay, John Gunliff, Fairfield Hall, near Skipton. *Kay, John Robinson. Walmersley House, Bury, Lancashire. Kay, Robert. Haugh Bank, Bolton-le-Moors. *Kay, Rev. William, D.D. Great Leghs Rectory, Chelmsford. {Keames, William M. 5 Lower Rock-gardens, Brighton. {Keeling, George William. Tuthill, Lydney. { Keene, “Alf ed. Eastnoor Ags Leamington. {Kexanp, Rey. Purr, M.A., F.R.S. L. & E., Professor of Mathe- matics in the University of Edinburgh. 20 Clarendon-crescent, Edinburgh. *Kelland, William Henry. 110 Jermyn-street, London, 8.W.; and Grettans, Bow, North Devon. tKelly, Andrew G. The Manse, Alloa, N.B. *Kelly, W. M., M.D. 11 The Crescent, Taunton, Somerset. {Kemp, Rey. Henry William, B.A. The Charter House, Hull. {Kennepy, AtexanpER B. W., C.E., Professor of Engineering in University College, London. 9 Bartholomew-road, London, N.W. {Kennedy, Hugh. Redclyffe, Partickhill, Glaszow. } Kennedy, Lieut.-Colonel John Pitt, 20 Torrin, gton-square, Blank bury, London, W.C. }Kenrick, William. Norfolk-road, Edgbaston, Birmingham. Kent, J.C. Levant Lodge, Earl's Croome, Worcester. {Kent, William T., M.R. D. S. 51 Rutland-square, Dublin. { Kenworth, James "Ryley y. 7 Pembroke-place, Liverpool. *Ker, André Allen Murray. Newbliss House, Newbliss, Ireland. *Ker, Robert. Dougalston, Milngavie, N.B. tKer, William. 1 Windsor-terrace West, Glasgow. {Kerrison, Roger. Crown Bank, Nor wich. *Kesselmeyer, “Charles A. 1 Peter-street, Manchester. *Kesselmeyer, William Johannes. 1 Peter-street, Manchester. *Keymer, John. Parker-street, Manchester. {Kidston, J.B. West Regent-street, Glasgow. {Kidston, William. Ferniegair, Helensburgh, N.B. *Kinahan, Edward Hudson, MRA. Il Merrion-square North, Dublin. §Kinahan, Edward Hudson, jun. 11 Merrion-square North, Dublin. {Kovanan, G. Heyry, M. Ri. A., Geological Survey of Ireland. 14 Hume-street, Dublin. ~ { Kincaid, Henry Ellis, M.A. 8 Lyddon-terrace, Leeds. *Kinch, Edward, F.C.S. Agricultural College, Home Department, Tokio, Japan. (Care of C. J. Kinch, Esq., Eaton Hasting, Lechlade, Gloucestershire.) LIST OF MEMBERS. 45, Year of Election. 1872. 1875. 1871. 1855. 1870. 1864, 1860. 1875. 1870. 1869. 1861. 1876. 1835. 1875. 1867. 1867. 1870. 1863. 1860. 1876. 1875. 1870. 1869, 1870. 1836, 1872. 1873. 1872. 1842, 1874. 1876, 1835. 1875. 1870. 1865. 1858, 1859. 1870, 1870. 1877. *King, Mrs. E. M, 34 Cornwall-road, Westbourne Park, London, W. *King, F. Ambrose. Avonside, Clifton, Bristol. *King, Herbert Poole. Theological College, Salisbury. {King, James. Levernholme, Hurlet, Glasgow. §King, John Thomson, C.E. 4 Clayton-square, Liverpool. King, Joseph. Blundell Sands, Liverpool. nme appear M.D. 27 George-street, and Royal Institution, ull. *King, Mervyn Kersteman. 16 Vyvyan-terrace, Clifton, Bristol. *Kine, Perey L. Avonside, Clifton, Bristol. {King, William. 13 Adelaide-terrace, Waterloo, Liverpool. King, William Poole, F.G.S. Avonside, Clifton, Bristol. {Kingdon, K. Taddiford, Exeter. {Kingsley, John. Ashfield, Victoria Park, Manchester. §Kingston, Thomas. Strawberry House, Chiswick, Middlesex. Kingstone, A. John, M.A. Mosstown, Longford, Ireland. eae Cuartes T., ga 12 Auriol-road, The Cedars, West Kensington, London, W. {Kinloch, Colonel. Kirriemuir, Logie, Scotland. *Kinnarrp, The Right Hon. Lord. 2 Pall Mall East, London, S.W.; and Rossie Priory, Inchture, Perthshire. {Kinsman, William R. Branch Bank of England, Liverpool. tKirkaldy, David. 28 Bartholomew-road North, London, N.W. {Karxman, Rey. Tuomas P., M.A., F.R.S. Croft Rectory, near Warrington. ae ae Rev. W. B., D.D. 48 North Great George-street,. ublin. *Kirkwood, cae: LL.D., F.R.S.E. 12 Windsor-terrace West, Hillhead, Glasgow. {Kirsop, John. 6 Queen’s-crescent, Glasgow. {Kitchener, Frank E. Rugby. {Knapman, Edward. The Vineyard, Castle-street, Exeter. §Kneeshaw, Henry. 2 Gambier-terrace, Liverpool. Knipe, J. A, Botcherby, Carlisle. *Knott, George, LL-B., F.R.A.S. Cuclfield, Hayward’s Heath, Sussex. j *Knowles, George. Moorhead, Shipley, Yorkshire. j {Knowles, James. The Hollies, Clapham Common, S.W. Knowles, John. The Lawn, Rugby: §Knowles, William James. Cullybackey, Belfast, Ireland. {Knox, David N., M.A., M.B. 8 Belgrave Terrace, Hillhead, Glasgow. “Hnog, George James. 2 Portland-terrace, Regent's Park, London, N.W. Knox, Thomas B. Union Club, Trafalgar-square, London, W.C. *Knubley, Rev. E. P. 10 Bridge-road West, Battersea, S.W. tKynaston, Josiah W. St. Helen’s, Lancashire. ey {Kynnersley, J.C. S. The Leveretts, Handsworth, Birmingham. §Lace, Francis John. Stone Gapp, Cross-hill, Leeds. §Ladd, William, F.R.A.S. 11 & 13 Beak-street, Regent-street, Lon- don, W. {Laird, H.H. Birkenhead. Laird, John, M.P. Hamilton-square, Birkenhead. §Laird, John, jun. Grosyenor-road, Claughton, Birkenhead. §Lake, W.C., M.D. Teignmouth. 46 Year of LIST OF MEMBERS. Election. 1859. 1846. 1870. 1871. {Lalor, John Joseph, M.R.I.A. 2 Loneford-terrace, Monkstown, Co, Dublin. *Laming, Richard. The Parade, Arundel, Sussex. {Lamport, Charles. Upper Norwood, Surrey, SE. tLancaster, Edward. Karesforth Hall, Barnsley, Yorkshire. 1877.§§Landon, Frederic G. Nelson House, Devonport. 1859. 1864. 1870. 1865. tLang, Rev. John Marshall. Bank House, Morningside, Edinburgh, §Lang, Robert. Langford Lodge, College-road, Clifton, Bristol. {Langton, Charles. Barkhill, Aigburth, Liverpool. *Langton, William. Docklands, Ingatestone, Hssex. {LanxKester, E. Ray, M.A., F.R.S., Professor of Comparative Ana- tomy and Zoology in University College, London, Exeter College, Oxford. Lanyon, Sir Charles. The Abbey, White Abbey, Belfast. . §Lapper, E., M.D. 61 Harcourt-street, Dublin. *Larcom, Major-General Sir THomas AiskEw, Bart., K.C.B., R.E., F.R.S., M.R.LA. Heathfield House, Fareham, Hants. Lassett, Witrr1aM, LL.D., F.RS.L. & E., F.R.A.S. Ray Lodge, Maidenhead. . *Latham, Arthur G. Lower King-street, Manchester. . *LarHam, Batpwin, C.E., F.G.8. 7 Westminster-chambers, West- minster, 8. W. . {Laughton, John Knox, M.A., F.R.A.S., F.R.G.S. Royal Naval College, Greenwich, S.E. . {Layvineton, Wiliam F. 107 Pembroke-road, Clifton, Bristol. . *Law, Channell. 5 Champion-park, Camberwell, London, 8.E. . §Law, Henry, C.E. 5 Queen Anne’s-gate, London, 5.W. . tLaw, Hugh, Q.C. 4 Great Denmark-street, Dublin. . tLaw, Rev. James Edmund, M.A. Little Shelford, Cambridgeshire. Lawley, The Hon. Francis Charles. Escrick Park, near York. Lawley, The Ifon. Stephen Willoughby. Escrick Park, near York. 70. {Lawrence, Edward. Aigburth, Liverpool. 75, {Lawson, George, Ph.D., LL.D., Professor of Chemistry and Botany. Halifax, Nova Scotia. . {Zawson, Henry. 8 Nottingham-place, London, TW. . Lawson, The Right Hon. James A., LL.D., M.R.LA. 27 Fitz william-street, Dublin. . {Zawson, John. Cluny Hill, Forres, N.B. . “Lawson, M. Arexanper, M.A., F.L.S., Professor of Botany in the University of Oxford. Botanic Gardens, Oxford. 3. {Lawton, Benjamin C. Neyille Chambers, 44 Westeate-street, Newcastle-upon-Tyne. 3. {Lawton, William. 5 Victoria-terrace, Derringham, Hull. . t{Lea, Henry. 35 Paradise-street, Birmingham. . tLeach, Captain R. E. Mountjoy, Phoenix Park, Dublin. . *Leaf, Charles John, F.LS., F.G.S., F.S.A. Old Change, London, E.C. ; and Painshill, Cobham. . *Learnam, Epwarp Atpam, M.P. Whitley Hall, Iuddersfield ; and 46 Eaton-square, London, 8.W. 4. *Leather, John Towlerton, F.S.A. Leventhorpe Hall, near Leeds. . {Leather, John W. Newton-green, Leeds. . t{Leavers, J. W. The Park, Nottingham. : ; 2. tLrnour, G. A., F.G.8S. Weedpark Hcuse, Dipton, Lintz Green, Co. Durham. . *Le Cappelain, John. _Wood-lane, Highgate, London, N. . t{Ledgard, William. Potter Newton, near Leeds. . tLee, Henry. Irwell House, Lower Broughton, Manchester. - Year LIST OF MEMBERS. 47 of Election. 1853. *Lrr, Joun Epwarp, F.G.S., F.S.A. Villa Syracusa, Torquay, 1859, 1872. 1869. 1868. 1856. 1861. 1870. 1867. 1870. 1859. 1863. 1867. 1878. 1861, 1871. 1874. 1861. 1872. 1871. 1856. 1882. 1876. 1866. 1870. 1853. 1860. 1876. 1862. 1878, 1871. 1871. 1870. 1842, . tLees, William. Link Vale Lodge, Viewforth, Edinburgh, *Leese, Joseph. Glenfield, Altrincham, Manchester. “Leeson, Henry B., M.A., M.D., F.R.S., F.C.S. The Maples, Bon- church, Isle of Wight. tLereven, G. Suaw, M.P., F.R.G.S. 18 Spring-gardens, London, S.W. *Lerroy, Lieut.-General Sir Joun Henry, C.B., K.C.M.G., R.A, F.RAS., F.R.G.S. 82 Queen’s-gate, London, 8S. W. “Legh, Lieut.-Colonel George Cornwall, M.P. High Legh Hall, Cheshire ; and 45 Curzon-street, Mayfair, London, W. tLe Grice, A. J. Trereife, Penzance. tLercesrer, The Right Hon. the Earl of. Holkham, Norfolk. {Lxien, The Right Hon. Lord, D.C.L. 37 Portman-square, London, W.; and Stoneleigh Abbey, Kenilworth. *Leigh, Henry. Moorfield, Swinton, near Manchester. {Leighton, Andrew. 35 High-park-street, Liverpool. §Leishman, James. Gateacre Hall, Liverpool. ftLeister, G. F. Gresbourn House, Liverpool. {Leith, Alexander. Glenkindie, Inverkindie, N.B. “Lenpy, Captain Avcuste Freperic, F.L.S., F.G.S. Sunbury House, Sunbury, Middlesex. tLeng, John. ‘Advertiser’ Office, Dundee. §Lennon, Rey. Francis. The College, Maynooth, Ireland. tLennox, A. C. W. 7 Beaufort-gardens, Brompton, London, S.W. Lentaigne, John, C.B., M.D. Tallaght House, Co. Dublin; and 1 Great Denmark-street, Dublin. Lentaigne, Joseph. 12 Great Denmark-street, Dublin. §Lzonarp, Hven, F.G.8., M.R.LA., F.R.G.S.I. Geological Survey of Ireland, 14 Hume-street, Dublin. tLepper, Charles W. Laurel Lodge, Belfast. tLeppoc, Henry Julius. Kersal Crag, near Manchester. tLermit, Rey. Dr. School House, Dedham. {Leslie, Alexander, C.E. 72 George-street, Edinburgh. tLeslie, Colonel J. Forbes. Rothienorman, Aberdeenshire. {Lesuim, T. E. Criere, LL.B., Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Economy, Queen’s College, Belfast. {Leveson, Edward John. Cluny, Sydenham Till, SE. §Levi, Dr. Lzonn, F.S.A., F.S.S., F.R.G.S., Professor of Com- mercial Law in King’s College, London. 5 Crown Office-row, Temple, London, E.C, {Lewis, Atrrep Lionen. 151 Church-road, De Beauvoir Town, London, N. {Liddell, George William Moore. Sutton House, near Hull. {Lippext, The Very Rey. H. G., D.D., Dean of Christ Church, Oxford fLietke, J. O. 50 Gordon-street, Glascow. {Lrzrorp, The Right Hon, Lord, F.L.S. Lilford Hall, Oundle, North- amptonshire. *Limerick, The Right Rey. Cuartus Graves, D.D., M.R.L.A., Lord Bishop of. The Palace, Henry-street, Limerick. §Lincolne, William. Ely, Cambridgeshire. *Lindsay, Charles. Ridge Park, Lanark, N.B. *Linpsay, The Right Hon. Lord, M.P., F.R.S. 47 Brook-street, London, W. {Lindsay, Rev. T. M. 7 Great Stuart-street, Edinburgh. {Lindsay, Thomas, F.C.S. 288 Renfrew-street, Glasgow. *Lingard, John R., F.G.8, 4 Westminster-chambers, London, 8, We 48 Year of Election LIST OF MEMBERS. _ Lingwood, Robert M., M.A., F.L.S., F.G.S. 1 Derby-villas, Chel- 1876. 1875. 1870, 1876. 1861. 1876. 1864. 1860. 1842. 1865. tenham. §Linn, James. Geological Survey Office, India-buildings, Edinburgh. Lister, James. Liverpool Union Bank, Liverpool. * Lister, Samuel Cunliffe. Farfield Hall, Addingham, Leeds. §Lister, Thomas. Victoria-crescent, Barnsley, Yorkshire, {Little, Thomas Evelyn. 42 Brunswick-street, Dublin. Littledale, Harold. Liscard Hall, Cheshire. *Lrveine, G. D., M.A., F.C.S., Professor of Chemistry in the Uni- versity of Cambridge. Cambridge. *Liversidge, Archibald, F.C.S., F.G.S., F.R.G.S., Professor of Geology and Mineralogy in the University of Sydney, N.S.W. (Care of Messrs. Triibner & Co., Ludgate Hill, London, E.C.) §Livesay, J. G. Cromarty House, Ventnor, Isle of Wight. { Livingstone, Rev. Thomas Gott, Minor Canon of Carlisle Cathedral. Lloyd, Rev. A, R. Hengold, near Oswestry. Lloyd, Rev. C., M.A. Whittington, Oswestry. Lloyd, Edward. King-street, Manchester. {Lloyd, G. B. Edgbaston-grove, Birmingham. *Lloyd, George, M.D., F.G.S. Park Glass Works, Birmingham. *Lioyp, Rev. Humenrey, D.D., LL.D., F.R.S. L.& E., M.R.TA., Provost of Trinity College, Dublin. {Lloyd, James. 16 Welfield-place, Liverpool. {Lloyd, J. H., M.D. Anglesey, North Wales. {Lloyd, John. Queen’s College, Birmingham. Lloyd, Rev. Rees Lewis. Belper, Derbyshire. *Lloyd, Sampson Samuel, M.P. Moor Hall, Sutton Coldfield. *Lloyd, Wilson, F.R.G.S. Myrod House, Wednesbury. *Losiey, JAmes Loean, F.G.8., F.R.G.S. 59 Clarendon-road, Ken- sington Park, London, W. *Locke, John. 133 Leinster-road, Dublin. *Locke, John. 83 Addison-road, Kensington, London, W. tLocks, Jonny, M.P. 65 Eaton-place, London, 8.W. {Locxyer, J. Norman, F.R.S., F.R.A.S, 16 Penywern-road, South Kensington, London, 8. W. *Loper, Ottver J., D.Sc. University College, London, W.C.; and 17 Parkhurst-road, London, N. {Login, Thomas, C.E., F.R.S.E. India. tLong, Andrew, M.A. King’s College, Cambridge. tLong, H. A. Charlotte-street, Glasgow. {Long, Jeremiah. 50 Marine Parade, Brighton. *Long, John Jex. 727 Duke-street, Glasgow. tLong, William, F.G.S. Hurts Hall, Saxmundham, Suffolk. §Longdon, Frederick. Osmaston-road, Derby. Lonerietp, The Right Hon. Movntrrort, LL.D., M.R.LA., Regius Professor of Feudal and English Law in the University of Dublin. 47 Fitzwilliam-square, Dublin. {Longmuir, Rey. John, M.A., LL.D. 14 Silver-street, Aberdeen. *Longstaff, George Blundell, M.A., M.B., F.C.S. Southfield Grange, Wandsworth, 8. W. . §Longstaff, George Dixon, M.D., F.C.S. Southfields, Wandsworth, S.W.; and 9 Upper Thames-street, London, E.C. PERE ny *Longstaff, Lieut.-Colonel Llewellyn Wood, F.R.G.S. Reform Club, Pall Mall, London, S.W. §Lonsdale, N. Lowenthal. 1 Southernhay, Clifton, Bristol. *Lord, Edward. Adamroyd, Todmorden. tLosh, W.S. Wreay Syke, Carlisle. LIST OF MEMBERS. 49 Year of Election. 1876, 1875. 41867. 1863. 1861. 1870. 1868, 1850. 1853. 1870. 1878. 1849. 1875. 1867. 1873. 1866. 1873. 1850. 1853. 1858. 1864. 1874. 1864. 1866 1871. 1874. 1857. 1878. 1862. 1852. 1854. 1876. 1876. 1868. 1878. 1868, 1866. 1840, SZ. 1866, 1865. 1855. 1876, “Love, James, F.R.A.S. Talbot Lodge, Bickerton-road , Upper Holloway, London, N. “Lovett, W. J. 96 Lionel-street, Birmingham. *Low, James F. Monifieth, by Dundee. *Lowe, Lieut.-Colonel Arthur S. H., F.R.A.S. 76 Lancaster-gate, London, W. “Lows, Epwarp Josrpn, F.R.S., F.R.AS., F.LS., £.G.8., F.M.S. Highfield House Observatory, near Nottingham. {Lowe, G. C.-_ 67 Cecil-street, Gveenheys, Manchester. {Lowe, John, M.D. King’s Lynn. ana Hee Henry, M.D., F.R.S.E. Balgreen, Slateford, Edin- urgh. *Lusock, Sir Joun, Bart., M.P., F.R.S., F.L.S., F.G.8, High Elms, Farnborough, Kent. {Lubbock, Montague. High Elms, Farnborough, Kent. §Lucas, Joseph. Tooting Graveney, London, 8S. W. *Luckcock, Howard. Oak-hill, Edgbaston, Birmingham. §Lucy, W. C., F.G.S._ The Winstones, Brookthorpe, Gloucester, *Luis, John Henry. Cidhmore, Dundee. {Lumley, J. Hope Villa, Thornbury, near Bradford, Yorkshire. “Lund, Charles. 48 Market-street, Bradford, Yorkshire. tLund, Joseph. Ilkley, Yorkshire. *Lundie, Cornelius. Tweed Lodge, Charles-street, Cardiff, {Lunn, William Joseph, M.D. 23 Charlotte-street, Hull. *Lupton, Arthur. Headingley, near Leeds. *Lupton, Darnton. The Harehills, near Leeds. *Lupton, Sydney. Harrow. *Lutley, John. Brockhampton Park, Worcester. {Lycert, Sir Francis. 18 Highbury-grove, London, N. {Lyell, Leonard. 42 Regent’s Park-road, London, N. W. tLynam, James, C.E. Ballinasloe, Ireland. tLyons, Robert D., M.B., M.R.I.A. 8 Merrion-square West, Dublin. §Lyte, Cecil Maxwell. Scientific Club, Savile-row, London, W. *Lyte, F. Maxwell, F.C.S. 6 Cité de Retiro, Faubourg St. Honoré, Paris. {McAdam, Robert. 18 College-square East, Belfast. *MacapaM, Stevenson, Ph.D., F.R.S.E., F.C.S., Lecturer on Chemistry. Surgeons’ Hall, Edinburgh ; and Brighton House, Portobello, by Edinburgh. {M‘Adam, William. 30 St. Vincent-crescent, Glasgow. *Macadam, William Ivison. Surgeons’ Hall, Edinburgh. tMacaristErR, ALEXANDER, M.D., Professor of Zoology in the Uni- versity of Dublin. 13 Adelaide-road, Dublin. §MeAlister, Donald, B.A., B.Sc. St. John’s College, Cambridge, TM‘Allan, W. A. Norwich. *M‘Arthur, A., M.P. Raleigh Hall, Brixton Rise, London, S.W. Macaulay, James A. M.,M.D. 22 Cambridge-road, Kilburn, Lon- don, N. W. {M‘Bain, James, M.D., R.N. Logie Villa, York-road, Trinity, Edin- burgh. Were yns) Robert. Messrs, Black and Wingate, 5 Exchange square, Glascow. {M‘Catran, Rev. J. F., M.A. Basford, near Nottingham. {M‘Calmont, Robert. Gatton Park, Reigate. {M‘Cann, Rev. James, D.D.,F.G.S. 18 Shaftesbury-terrace, Glassow, *“M‘Crettanp, A.S, 4 Crown-gardens, Dowanhill, Glasgow. E ‘50 LIST OF MEMBERS. Year of Election. 1840, M‘Crmntanp, Jamns, F.S.8. 32 Pembridge-square, London, W. ~ 1868. {M‘Crmrocx, Rear-Admiral Sir Francts L., R.N., F.R.S., F.R.GS. United Service Club, Pall Mall, London, 8. W. 1872. *M‘Clure, J ria The Telephone Company, 115 Cannon-street, ‘Lon- don, E.C. 1874, {M‘Clure, Sir Thomas, Bart. Belmont, Belfast. 1878. *M‘Comas, Henry. . Homestead, Dundrum, Co. Dublin. *M‘Connel, James. Moore-place, Esher, Surrey. 1859. *M‘Connell, David C., F.G.S8. 44 Manor-place, Edinburgh. 1858. {M‘Comnell, J. E. “Woodlands, Great Missenden. 1876. {M‘Oulloch, Richard. 109 Douglas-street, Blythswood-square, Glas- cow. 1871. {MDonald, William, Yokohama, Japan. (Care of R. K. Kneyvitt, Esq., Sun-court, Cornhill, F.C.) MacDonnell, Hercules H. G. 2 Kildare-place, Dublin. 1878, §McDonnell, Robert, M.D., F.R.S., M.R.LA. 14 Lower Pembroke- street, Dublin. *M‘Ewan, John. 9 Melville-terrace, Stirling, N.B. 1859. {Macfarlane, Alexander. 73 Bon Accord-street, Aberdeen. 1871.§§M‘Farlane, Donald. The College Laboratory, Glasgow. 1855. *Macfarlane, Walter. 22 Park-circus, Glasgow. 1854. *Macfie, Robert Andrew. 13 Victoria-street, Westminster, S.W. 1867. *M‘Gavin, Robert. Ballumbie, Dundee. 1855. {MacGeorge, Andrew, jun. 21 St. Vincent-place, Glasgow. 1872. {M‘George, Mungo. Nithsdale, Laurie Park, Sydenham, S.E. 1873. {McGowen, William Thomas. Oak-ayenue, Oak Mount, Bradford, Yorkshire. 1855. {M‘Gregor, Alexander Bennett. 19 Woodside-crescent, Glasgow. 1855. t{MacGregor, James Watt. 2 Laurence-place, Partick, Glasgow. 1876. {M‘Grigor, Alexander B. 19 Woodside-terrace, Glasgow. 1859. {M‘Hardy, David. 54 Netherkinkgate, Aberdeen. 1874, §MacIlwaine, Rev. William, D.D., M-R.LA. Ulsterville, Belfast. 1876.§§Macindoe, Patrick. 9 Somerset-place, Glasgow. 1859. {Macintosh, John. Middlefield House, Woodside, Aberdeen. 1867. *M‘Intosu, W. O., M.D.,F B.S. L. & E., F.L.S. Murthly, Perthshire. 1854. *MacIver, Charles. 8 Abercromby-square, Liverpool. 1871. {Mackay, Rev. A., LL.D., F.R.G.S. 2 Hatton-place, Grange, Edin- burch. 1873. {McKrnprick, Joun G.,M.D., F.R.S.E. 2 Chester-street, Edinburgh. 1865. tMackeson, Henry B., F.G.S. Hythe, Kent. 1872. *Mackey, J. A. 24 Buckingham-place, Brighton. 1867. §Mackre, Samwvrr Josupu, F.G.S. 84 Kensington Park-road, Lon- don, W. *Mackinlay, David. Great Western-terrace, Hillhead, Glasgow. 1865. {Mackintosh, Daniel, F.G.S. 36 Derby-road, Higher Tranmere, Bir- kenhead. 1850. t{Macknight, Alexander. 12 London-street, Edinburgh, 1867. {Mackson, H. G. 25 Cliff-road, Woodhouse, Leeds. , 1872. *McLacutay, Rosert, F.R.S., F.L.S. 39 Limes-grove, Lewisham, S.E. ; 1873. tMcLandsborough, John, C.E., F.R.A.S., F.G.S. Shipley, near Brad- ford, Yorkshire. 1860. {Maclaren, Archibald. Summertown, Oxfordshire. 1864.§§MacLaren, Duncan, M.P. Newington House, Edinburgh. 1873. t{MacLaren, Walter S. B. Newington House, Edinburgh, 1876, {M‘Lean, Charles. 6 Claremont-terrace, Glasgow. 1876, {M‘Lean, Mrs. Charles, 6 Claremont-terrace, Glasgow. LIST OF MEMBERS. 51 ‘Year of Election, 1859. {Mactuar, Sir THomas, F.R.S., F.R.G.S., F.R.A.S. Cape Town, South Africa. 1862. {Macleod, Henry Dunning. 17 Gloucester-terrace, Campden-hill-road, London, W. 1868.§§M‘Lrop, Hersert, F.C.S. Indian Civil Engineering College, Cooper’s Hill, Ezham. 1875. {Macliver, D. 1 Broad-street, Bristol. 1875. {Macliver, P.S. 1 Broad-street, Bristol. 1861. *Maclure, John William. 2 Bond-street, Manchester. 1878. *M‘Master, George, M.A., J.P. Donnybrook, Ireland. 1862. {Macmillan, Alexander. Streatham-lane, Upper Tooting, Surrey, S.W. 1874.§§MacMordie, Hans, M.A. & Donegall-street, Belfast. 1871, {M‘Nas, Wrirram Ramsay, M.D., Professor of Botany in the Royal College of Science, Dublin. 4 Vernon-parade, Clontarf, Dublin. 1870. {Macnaught, John, M.D. 74 Huskisson-street, Liverpool. 1867. §M‘Neill, John. Balhousie House, Perth. MacNer1, The Right Hon. Sir Jomy, G.C.B., F.R.S.E., F.R.G.S, Granton House, Edinburgh. MacNetrtt, Sir Jony, LL.D., F.R.S., F.R.A.S., M.R.I.A. 17 The Grove, South Kensington, London, S.W. 1878. §Macnie, George. 59 Bolton-street, Dublin. 1852, *Macrory, Adam John. Duncairn, Belfast. “Macrory, Epmunp,M.A. 40 Leinster-square, Bayswater, London, W. 1876, *Mactear, James. 16 Burnbank-gardens, Glasgow, . 1855. {M‘Tyre, William, M.D. Maybole, Ayrshire. 1855. {Macvicar, Rev. Joun Grason, D.D., LL.D. Moffat, N.B. 1868, {Magnay, F. A. Drayton, near Norwich. 1875, *Magnus, Philip. 48 Gloucester-place, Portman-square, London, W. 1878. §Mahony, W. A. 34 College-creen, Dublin. 1869, {Main, Robert. Admiralty, Whitehall, London, 8.W. 1866.§§Mazsor, Ricuarp Henry, F.S.A., Sec.R.G.S. British Museum, © London, W.C. *Mazanipe, The Right Hon. Lord Tarzor pz, M.A., D.C.L., F.RS., F.G.S., F.S.A., MR.LA. Malahide Castle, Co. Dublin. *Malcolm, Frederick. Morden College, Blackheath, London, 8.E. 1870. *Malcolm, Sir James, Bart. 1 Cornwall-gardens, South Kensington, London, 8. W. 1874, {Malcolmson, A. B. Friends’ Institute, Belfast. 1863, {Maling, 0. T. Lovaine-crescent, Newcastle-on-Tyne. 1857. {Mallet, John William, Ph.D., M.D., F.R.S., F.0.8., Professor of Chemistry in the University of Virginia, U.S. *Matier, Rosert, Ph.D., F.RS., F.G.S., MRL A. Enmore, The Grove, Clapham-road, Clapham, S.W. 1876, {Malloch, C. 7 Blythwood-square, Glasgow. 1846, {Mansy, Cuartus, F.RS., F.G.S. 60 Westbourne-terrace, Hyde Park, London, W. 1870. {Manifold, W. H. 45 Rodney-street, Liverpool. 1866, §Mann, Rozsert James, M.D., F.R.A.S. 5 Kingsdown-yillas, Wands- \ worth Common, 8.W. Manning, His Eminence Cardinal, Archbishop's House, West- minster, S. W. 1866. {Manning, John. Waverley-street, Nottingham. 1878, §Manning, Robert. 4 Upper Ely-place, Dublin. 1864, {Mansel, J.C. Long Thorns, Blandford. 1870, {Marcoartu, Senor Don Arturo de. Madrid. 1864, {Marxuam, Cremeyts R., C.B., F.R.S., F.LS., Sec.R.G.S., FS.A, 21 Eccleston-square, Pimlico, London,.8, W. E2 52 LIST OF MEMBERS. Year of Election. 1863. {Marley, John. Mining Office, Darlington. *Marling, Samuel §., M.P. Stanley Park, Stroud, Gloucester- shire. 1871.§§Marreco, A. Friere-. College of Physical Science, Newcastle-on- Tyne. 1857. {Marribtt, William, F.C.S. Grafton-street, Huddersfield. 1842. Marsden, Richard. Norfolk-street, Manchester. 1870. {Marsh, John. Rann Lea, Rainhill, Liverpool. 1865. tMarsh, J. F. Hardwick House, Chepstow. 1864. {Marsh, Thomas Edward Miller. 37 Grosyenor-place, Bath. 1852. {Marshall, James D. Holywood, Belfast. 1876. {Marshall, Peter. 6 Parkgrove-terrace, Glasgow. 1858. {Marshall, Reginald Dykes. Adel, near Leeds. «Lh 1849. *Marshall, William P. 6 Portland-road, Edgbaston, Birmingham. 1865. §Marren, Eywarp Brypon. Pedmore, near Stourbridge. 1848. {Martin, Henry D. 4 Imperial-circus, Cheltenham. . 1878. §Martin, H. Newell. Christ’s College, Cambridge. 1871. {Martin, Rev. Hugh, M.A. Greenhill Cottage, Lasswade, by Edin- burgh. 1870. {Martin, Robert, M.D. 120 Upper Brook-street, Manchester. 1836. Martin, Studley. 177 Bedford-street South, Liverpool. 1867. {Martin, William Young. 3 Airlie-place, Dundee. sap. Nicholas. Meadow Bank, Vanbrugh-fields, Blackheath, E *Martineau, Rey. James, LL.D., D.D. 5 Gordon-street, Gordon- square, London, W.C. 1865. {Martineau, R. F. Highfield-road, Edgbaston, Birmingham, 1865. {Martineau, Thomas. 7 Cannon-street, Birmingham. 1875. t{Martyn, Samuel, M.D. 8 Buckingham-villas, Clifton, Bristol. 1878. §Masaki, Taiso. Japanese Consulate, 84 Bishopsgate-street Within, London, E.C.: 1847, {MaskeLynE, Nevin Srory, M.A., F.R.S., F.G.8., Keeper of the Mineralogical Department, British Museum, and Professor of Mineralogy in the University of Oxford. 112 Gloucester-terrace, Hyde Park-gardens, London, W. 1861. *Mason, Hugh. Groby Lodge, Ashton-under-Lyne. 1868. {Mason, James Wood, F.G.S. The Indian Museum, Calcutta. (Care of Messrs. Henry 8. King & Co., 65 Cornhill, London, E.C.) 1876. §Mason, Robert. 6 Albion-crescent, Dowanhill, Glasgow. 1876. {Mason, Stephen. 9 Rosslyn-terrace, Hillhead, Glasgow. Massey, Hugh, Lord. Hermitage, Castleconnel, Co. Limerick. 1870. tMassey, Thomas. 5 Gray’s-Inn-square, London, W.C. 1870. {Massy, Frederick. 50 Grove-street, Liverpool. 1876.§§Matheson, John. LEastfield, Rutherglen, Glasgow. 1865. *Matthews, G. 8. Portland-road, Edgbaston, Birmingham. 1861. *Marnews, Witrram, M.A., F.G.S. 49 Harborne-road, Birming- ham. 1876, *Mathiesen, John, jun. Cordale, Renton, Glasgow. 1865. {Matthews, C. E. Waterloo-street, Birmingham. - 1858. {Matthews, F.C. Mandre Works, Driffield, Yorkshire. 1860.§§Matthews, Rev. Richard Brown. Shalford Vicarage, near Guild- ford. 1863. {Maughan, Rey. W. Benwell Parsonage, Newcastle-on-Tyne. 1865. *Maw, Goren, F.L.S., F.G.S., F.S.A. Benthall Hall, Broseley, Shropshire. 1876, t{Maxton, John. 6 Belgrave-terrace, Glasgow. LIST OF MEMBERS. 53 Year of Election. 1864, *Maxwell, Francis. St. Germains, Longniddry, East Lothian. *MAXwELL, JAmus Crerxk, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S.L. & E., Professor of Experimental Physics i in the University of Cambiidge. Glenlair, Dalbeattie, N.B.; and 11 Scroope-terrace, Cambridge. *Maxwell, Robert Perceval. Gr oomsport House, Belfast. 1868. {Mayall, J. E., F.C.S. Stork’s Nest, Lancing, Sussex. 1835. Mayne, Edward Ellis. Rocklands, Stillorgan, Ireland. 1878. *Mayne, Thomas. 38 Castle-street, Dublin. 1863. {Mease, George D. Bylton Villa, South Shields. 1871. {Meikie, James, F.S.S. 6 St. Andrew’s-square, Edinburgh. 1867. {Mztprum, Cartes, M.A., F.RS., FLR.A.S. Port Louis, Mau- ritius. 1866. {Mzx1o, Rev. J. M., M.A., F.G.S. St. Thomas’s Rectory, Brampton, Chesterfield. 1854, {Melly, Charles Pierre. 11 Rumford-street, Liverpool. 1847. {Melville, Professor Alexander Gordon, M.D. Queen’s College, Gal- way. 1863. {Melvin, Alexander. 42 Buccleuch-place, Edinburgh. 1877. *Menabrea, Lieut.-General Count. 385 Queen’s-gate, London, S.W. 1862.§§MrnneLt, Henry J. St. Dunstan’s-buildings, Great Tower-street, London, F.C. 1868. §MzRRIFIELD, CHARLES W., F.R.S. 20 Girdler’s-road, Brook Green, London, W. 1877.§§ Merrifield, J ohn, Ph.D., F.R.A.S. Gascoigne-place, Plymouth, 1871. {Merson, John. Northumberland County Asylum, Morpeth. 1872. *Messent, John. 429 Strand, London, W.C. 1863. {Messent, Pela Northumberland-terrace, Tynemouth. 1869. {Mratt, Lovis C., F.G.S.,Professor of Biology in Yorkshire College, Leeds. 1865. { Michie, Alexander. 26 Austin Friars, London, E.C. 1865. {Middlemure, William. Edgbaston, Birmingham. 1876. *Middleton, Robert T. 197 “West George-street, Glasgow. 1866. {Midgley, John. Colne, Lancashire. 1867. {Midgley, Robert. Colne, Lancashire. 1859. {Millar, John, J.P. Lisburn, Treland. 1863, {Millar, John, M.D., F.LS., F.G.8. Bethnal House, Gaapedeeioee London, E. Millar, Thomas, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S.E. Perth. 1876. {Millar, William. Highfield House, Dennistoun, Glasgow. 1876. §Millar, W. J. 145 Hill-street, Garnethill, Glasgow. 1876. {Miller, Daniel. 258 St. George’ s-road, Glasgow. 1875. {Miller, George. Brentry, near Bristol. 1865, {Miller, Rev. Canon J. C., D.D. The Vicarage, Greenwich, S.E. 1861. *Miller, Robert. Poise House, Bosden, near Stockport. 1876, *Miller, Robert. 1 Lily Bank-terrace, Hillhead, Glasgow. 1876. { Miller, Thomas Paterson. Morriston House, Cambuslang, N.B. MintEr, Wrr11am Hatrows, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S., F.G.S., Pro- fessor of Mineralogy in the University of Cambridge. 7 Ser oope- terrace, Cambridge. 1868, *Milligan, Joseph, F.L.S., F.G.S., F.R.A.S., F.R.G.S. 6 Craven- street, Strand, London, W.C. 1868, *Mri1s, Epwunp o D.Se., F.R.S., F.C.S., Young Professor of Technical Chemistry i in Anderson's University, Glasgow. 234 East George-street, Glasgow. *Mills, John Robert. 11 Bootham, York. Milne, Admiral Sir Alexander, Bart., G.O.B., F.R.S.E. 13 New- street, Spring-gardens, London, 8. W. 54 LIST OF MEMBERS. Year of Election. 1867. {Milne, James. Murie House, Errol, by Dundee. WE 1867. *Mrtnz-Homm, Davin, M.A., F.R.S.E., F.G.S. 10 York-place, Edinburgh. 1864. *Mizroy, The Right Hon. Lord, F.R.G.S. 17 Grosvenor-street, London, W.; and Wentworth, Yorkshire. 1865. {Minton, Samuel, F.G.S. Oakham House, near Dudley. 1855. {Mirrlees, James Buchanan. 45 Scotland-street, Glasgow. 1859. {Mitchell, Alexander, M.D. Old Rain, Aberdeen. 1876. {Mitchell, Andrew. 20 Woodside-place, Glasgow. 1863. {Mitchell, C. Walker. Newcastle-on-Tyne. 1873. {Mitchell, Henry. Parkfield House, Bradford, Yorkshire, 1870.§§Mitchell, John. York House, Clitheroe, Lancashire. 1868.§§Mitchell, John, jun. Pole Park House, Dundee. 1855. *Moffat, John, C.E. Ardrossan, Scotland. 7 1854. §Morrat, Tuomas, M.D., F.G.S., F.R.A.S., F.M.S. Hawarden, Chester. 1864. {Mogg, John Rees. High Littleton House, uear Bristol. 1866.§§Mocermer, Marruew, F.G.S. 8 Bina-gardens, South Kensington, London, 8. W. 1855. {Moir, James. 174 Gallogate, Glasgow. 1861. {Molesworth, Rev. W. N., M.A. Spotland, Rochdale. Mollan, John, M.D. 8 Fitzwilliam-square North, Dublin. 1878. §Molloy, Constantine. 70 Lower Gardiner-street, Dublin. 1877. *Molloy, Rev. G. 86 Stephen’s-green, Dublin. 1852. {Molony, William, LL.D. Carrickfergus. 1865. §MotynEvx, Wit1tAM, F.G.S. Branston Cottage, Burton-upon- Trent. 1860. {Monk, Rev. William, M.A.,F.R.A.S. Wymington Rectory, Higham Ferrers, Northamptonshire. 1853. {Monroe, Henry, M.D. 10 North-street, Sculcoates, Hull. 1872. §Montgomery, R. Mortimer. 3 Porchester-place, Edgware-road, London, W. 1872. tMoon, W., LL.D. 104 Queen’s-road, Brighton. 1859. {Moorz, Cuartus, F.G.S. 6 Cambridge-terrace, Bath. 1874. §Moore, David, Ph.D., F.L.S., M.R.I.A. Glasnevin, Dublin, 1857. t{Moore, Rey. John, D.D. Clontarf, Dublin. Moore, John. 2 Meridian-place, Clifton, Bristol. *Moors, Joun Carrick, M.A., F.R.S., F.G.S. 115 Eaton-square, London, 8.W.; and Corswall, Wigtonshire. 1866, *Moorr, Tuomas, F.L.S. Botanic Gardens, Chelsea, London, S.W. 1854, {Moorn, Tuomas Jonn, Cor. M.Z.S. Free Public Museum, Liver- pool. 1877. §Moore, W. F. The Friary, Plymouth. 1857. *Moore, Rey. William Prior. The Royal School, Cavan, Ireland. 1877.§§Moore, William Vanderkemp. 15 Princess-square, Plymouth. 1871. {Morn, Arexanper G., F.L.S., M.R.LA. 3 Botanic View, Glas- neyin, Dublin. 1873. {Morgan, Edward Delmar. 15 Rowland-gardens, London, W. 1868. {Morgan, Thomas H. Oakhurst, Hastings. 1833. Morgan, William, D.C.L. Oxon. Uckfield, Sussex. 1878. §Morgan, William, Ph.D. Swansea. 1867. {Morison, William R. Dundee. 1863, {Mortzy, Samvuet, M.P. 18 Wood-street, Cheapside, London, E C0, 1865. *Morrieson, Colonel Robert. Oriental Club, Hanover-square, London, W. LIST OF MEMBERS. 55 Year of Election. *Morris, Rev. Francis Orpen, B.A, Nunburnholme Rectory, Hayton, York. Morris, Samuel, M.R.D.S. Fortview, Clontarf, near Dublin. 1876.§§Morris, Rey. 8.8. O. The Grammar School, Dolgelly. 1874, ¢Morrison, G. J., C.E. 5 Victoria-street, Westminster, 5. W. 1871, *Morrison, James Darsie. 27 Grange-road, Edinburgh. 1865. §Mortimer, J. R. St, John’s-villas, Driffield. 1869, t{Mortimer, William. Bedford-circus, Exeter. 1857. §Morron, Grorer H., F.G.S. 122 London-road, Liverpool. 1858, *Morron, Henry Josern. 4 Royal Crescent, Scarborough. 1871. {Morton, Hugh. Belvedere House, Trinity, Edinburgh. 1857. tMoses, Marcus. 4 Westmoreland-street, Dublin. Mosley, Sir Oswald, Bart., D.C.L. Rolleston Hall, Burton-upon- Trent, Staffordshire. 1878. §Moss, Edward Lawton, M.D.,R.N. 48 Haddington-road, Dublin. Moss, John. Ottersgool, near Liverpool. 1878. *Moss, Jonn Francis. Ranmoor, Sheffield. 1870. {Moss, John Miles, M.A. 2 Esplanade, Waterloo, Liverpool. 1876. §Moss, RrcHarD Jackson, F.C.8., MR.LA. 66 Kenilworth-square, Rathgar, Dublin. 1873. *Mosse, George Staley. Cowley Hall, near Uxbridge. 1864, *Mosse, J. R. Public Works’ Department, Ceylon. (Care of Messrs. H. S. King & Co., 65 Cornhill, London, H.C.) 1873. {Mossman, William. Woodhall, Calverley, Leeds. 1869. §Morr, Atserr J., F.G.S. Adsett Court, Westbury-on-Severn. 1865.§§Mott, Charles Grey. The Park, Birkenhead. 1866. §Mott, Frederick T., F.R.G.S. Birstall Hill, Leicester. 1872. +Mott, Miss Minnie. 1 De Montfort-street, Leicester.’ 1862. *Movar, Frepprick Jonny, M.D., Local Government Inspector, 12 Durham-villas, Campden Hill, London, W. 1856. {Mould, Rey. J. G., B.D. Fulmodeston Rectory, Dereham, Norfolk. 1878. *Moulton, J. F. 74 Onslow-gardens, London, 5. W. 1863. tMounsey, Edward. Sunderland. Mounsey, John. Sunderland. 1861. *Mountcastle, William Robert. Bridge Farm, Ellenbrook, near Manchester. ; 1877.$§Mount-Epecuise, The Right Hon. the Earl of, D.C.L. Mount- Edgcumbe, Devonport. Mowbray, James. Combus, Clackmannan, Scotland. 1850. tMowbray, John T. 15 Albany-street, Edinburgh. 1874, §Muir, M. M. Pattison, F.R.S.E. Owens College, Manchester. 1876. *Muir, John. 6 Park-gardens, Glasgow. 1876.§§Muir, Thomas. High School, Glasgow. 1872. {Muirhead, Alexander, D.Se., F.C.S, 159 Camden-road, London, N 1871. *Murrueap, Heyry, M.D. Bushy Hill, Cambuslang, Lanarkshire. 1876, {Muirhead, R. F. Meikle Cloak, Lochwinnoch, Rentrewshire. Munby, Arthur Joseph. 6 Fig-tree-court, Temple, London, E.C. 1866. {Munpera, A. J., M.P., F.R.G.S, The Park, Nottingham. 1876. §Munro, Donald, F.C.S. 97 Eglinton-street, Glasgow. 1860, *Muwro, Major-General Wirtr1AM, C.B., F.L.S: United Service Club, ae Mall, London, 8.W.; and Mapperton Lodge, Farnborough, ants. 1872. *Munster, H. Sillwood Lodge, Brighton. 1871. *Munster, William Felix. 41 Brompton-square, London, W. 1864.§§Murcu, Jerom. Cranwells, Bath. *Murchison, John Henry. Surbiton Hill, Kingston. 1864, *Murchison, K. R. Brokehurst, East Grinstead. ++ * 56 LIST OF MEMBERS. Year of Election. 1876. {Murdoch, James. Altony Albany, Girvan, N.B. 1855. §Murdock, James B. Hamilton-place, Langside, Glasgow. 1852. {Murney, Henry, M.D. 10 Chichester-street, Belfast. 1852. t{Murphy, Joseph John, Old Forge, Dunmurry, Co. Antrim. 1869. {Murray, Adam. 4 Westbourne-crescent, Hyde Park, London, W. 1871. {Murray, Dr. Ivor, F.R.S.E. The Knowle, Brenchley, Staplehurst, Kent. Murray, John, F.G.S., F.R.G.S. 50 Albemarle-street, London, W. ; and Newsted, Wimbledon, Surrey. 1871. §Murray, John. 3 Clarendon-crescent, Edinburgh. 1859. {Murray, John, M.D. Forres, Scotland. *Murray, John, C.E. Downlands, Sutton, Surrey. {Murray, Rey. John. Morton, near Thornhill, Dumfriesshire. 1872. {Murray, J. Jardine. 99 Montpellier-road, Brighton. 1863. {Murray, William. 54 Clayton-street, Newcastle-on-Tyne. 1859, *Murton, James. Highfield, Silverdale, Carnforth, Lancaster. Musgrave, The Venerable Charles, D.D., Archdeacon of Craven, Halifax. : 1874. §Musgrave, James, J.P. Drumeglass House, Belfast. 1861. {Musgrove, John, jun. Bolton. 1870, *Muspratt, Edward Knowles. Seaforth Hall, near Liverpool. 1865. {Myers, Rev. E., F.G.S. 3 Waterloo-road, Wolverhampton. 1859.§§Myinz, Ropert WitiiaM, F.R.S., F.G.8., F.S.A. 21 Whitehall— place, London, S. W. 1842, Nadin, Joseph. Manchester. 1855. *Naprer, Jams R., F.R.S. 22 Blythwood-square, Glasgow. 1876.§§Napier, James 8. 9 Woodside-place, Glasgow. 1876. {Napier, John. Saughfield House, Hillhead, Glasgow. *Napier, Captain Johnstone, C.E. Laverstock House, Salisbury. 1839. *Naprer, The Right Hon. Sir Joszpu, Bart., D.C.L., LL.D. 4 Merrion-square South, Dublin. Napper, James William L. Loughcrew, Oldcastle, Co. Meath. 1872. §Nares, Captain Sir G. S., K.C.B., R.N., F.R.S., F.R.G.S. 23 St. Philip’s-road, Surbiton. 1866. {Nash, Davyd W., F.S.A., F.L.S. 10 Imperial-square, Cheltenham. 1850. *Nasmytu, JAMES, Penshurst, Tunbridge. 1864. {Natal, Rev. John William Colenso, D.D., Lord Bishop of. Natal. 1860. {Neate, Charles, M.A. Oriel Colleze, Oxford. 1873. {Neill, Alexander Renton. Fieldhead House, Bradford, Yorkshire. 1875. {Neill, Archibald. Fieldhead House, Bradford, Yorkshire. 1855. {Neilson, Walter. 172 West George-street, Glasgow. 1865, {Neilson, W. Montgomerie. Glasgow. 1876.§§Nelson, D. M. 48 Gordon-street, Glasgow. Ness, John. Helmsley, near York. 1868. {Nevill, Rev. H. R. The Close, Norwich. 1866. *Neyill, Rev. Samuel Tarratt, D.D., F.L.S., Bishop of Dunedin, New : Zealand. 1857. {Neville, John, C.E., M.R.I.A. Roden-place, Dundalk, Ireland. 1852. {Neville, Parke, C.E., M.R.I.A. 58 Pembroke-road, Dublin. 1869, {Nevins, John Birkbeck, M.D. 3 Abercromby-square, Liverpool. 1842, New, Herbert. Evesham, Worcestershire. Newall, Henry. Hare Hill, Littleborough, Lancashire. *Newall, Robert Stirling, F.R.S., F.R.A.S. Ferndene, Gateshead-- * upon-Tyne. 1866. et a Albert L. 2 The Pavement, Clapham Common, London,, = | W. » 1876. §Newhaus, Albert. 1 Prince’s-terrace, Glasgow. LIST OF MEMBERS. 57 Year of Election. 1842, “Newman, Professor Francis Wittram. 15 Arundel-crescent,. ‘Weston-super-Mare. 1863. *Nnwmarcu, Witt1am, F.R.S. Beech Holme, Balham, London, S.W. 1866. *Newmarch, William Thomas. 1 Elms-road, Clapham Common, London, S.W. 1877.§§Newth, A. H., M.D. Hayward’s Heath, Sussex. 1860. *Newron, Atrrep, M.A., F.R.S., F.LS., Professor of Zoology and Comparative Anatomy in the University of Cambridge. “Mag-- dalen College, Cambridge. 1872. {Newton, Rev. J. 125 Eastern-road, Brighton. 1865, {Newton, Thomas Henry Goodwin. Clopton House, near Stratford- on-A von 1867. {Nicholl, Thomas, ex-Dean of Guild. Dundee. 1874.§§Nicholls, H. F. King’s-square, Bridgewater, Somerset. 1875. {Nicholls, J. F. City Library, Bristol. ; 1866. {NicHoLson, Sir CHARLEs, Bart., M.D., D.C.L., LL.D., F.G.S.,. F.R.G.S. The Grange, Totteridge, Herts. : 1838, *Nicholson, Cornelius, F.G.S., F.S.A. Wellfield, Muswell Hill, Lon don, N. 1861. *Nicholson, Edward. 88 Mosley-street, Manchester. 1871.§§Nicholson, E. Chambers. Herne Hill, London, 8.E. 1867. {Nicnotson, Hunry Atteynz, M.D., D.Sc., F.G.S., Professor of Natural History in the University of St. Andrews, N.B. y 1850. {Nrcon, Jamus, F.R.S.E., F.G.8., Professor of Natural History in Marischal College, Aberdeen. 1867. {Nimmo, Dr. Matthew. Nethergate, Dundee. 1878. §Niven, C. Queen’s College, Cork. 1877. *Niven, James, M.A. Queen’s College, Cambridge. Niven, Ninian. Clonturk Lodge, Drumcondra, Dublin. ‘tNixon, Randal C. J., M.A. Green Island, Belfast. 1863, *Nosiz, Captain Anprew, F.R.S., F.R.A.S., F.C.S. Elswick Works, Newcastle-on-Tyne. 1870. {Nolan, Joseph, M.R.I.A. 14 Hume-street, Dublin. 1860. *Nolloth, Rear-Admiral Matthew S., R.N., F.R.G.S.. United Service Club, 8.W. ; and 13 North-terrace, Camberwell, London, S.E. 1859. {Norfolk, Richard. Messrs. W. Rutherford and Co., 14 Canada. Dock, Liverpool. 1868. Norgate, William. Newmarket-road, Norwich. 1863.§§Norman, Rey. ALFRED Mertz, M.A. Burnmoor Rectory, Fence House, Co. Durham. Norreys, Sir Denham Jephson, Bart. Mallow Castle, Co. Cork. 1865. {Norris Ricnarp, M.D, 2 Walsall-road, Birchfield, Birmingham. 1872.§§Norris, Thomas George. Corphwysfa, Llanrwst, North Wales. 1866. {North, Thomas. Cinder-hill, Nottingham. 1869. {NorrHcore, The Right Hon. Sir Srarrorp H., Bart., C.B., M.P.,. F.R.S. Pynes, Exeter, *Norruwick, The Right Hon. Lord, M.A. 7 Park-street, Grosyenor— square, London, W. 1868. {Norwich, The Hon. and Right Rev. J. T. Pelham, D.D., Lord Bishop of. Norwich. 1861. {Noton, Thomas. Priory House, Oldham. Nowell, John. Farnley Wood, near Huddersfield. 1878. §Nugent, Edward, O.E. Seel’s-buildings, Liverpool. 1878. §O’Brien, Murrough. 1 Willow-terrace, Blackrock, Co. Dublin. O'Callaghan, George. Tallas, Co. Clare. 58 LIST OF MEMBERS. Year of Election. 1878. §O’Carroll, Joseph F. 2 Garville-road, Dublin. 1878. §O' Connor Don, The, M.P. Clonalis, Castlerea, Tealaha Odgers, Rev. William James. . Saville House, Weston-road, Bath. 1858. *OpLine, Witt1aM, M.B., F.R.S., F.C.S. Wayntlete Professor of Chemistry in "the University of Oxford. The Museum, -Ox-'. ford. 1857. {O’Donnavan, William John, Portarlington, Ireland. 1870. O'Donnell, J.O,, M.D. 34 Rodney-street, Liverpool. 1877. §Ogden, Joseph. 46 London-wall, London, E.C. 1876. §§Ozilvie, Campbell P. Sizewell House, Lenton, Suffolk. 1859. {Osilvie, C. W. Norman. Baldovan House, Dundee. *OaitvrE-ForpEs, Goren, M.D., Professor of the Institutes of. Medicine in Marischal College, Aberdeen. Boyndlie, Fraser- burgh, N.B. 1874. §Ogilvie, Thomas Robertson, Bank Top, 3 Lyle-street, Greenock, N.B. 1863. {Ogilvy, G. R. Inverquharity, N.B. 1863, {Oaitvy, Sir Jon, Bart. Inverquharity, N.B. *Ogle, William, M.D., M.A. The Elms, Derby. 1859. {Oeston, Francis, M.D. 18 Adelphi-court, Aberdeen. 18387. {O' Hagan, John, M. A.,Q.C. 22 Upper Fitzwilliam-street, Dublin. 1874. tO'HAGan, The Right Hon. Lord, M.R.LA. 34 Rutland-square West, Dublin. 1862. {O’Kxttry, oT osppH, M.A., M.R.I.A. 14 Hume-street, Dublin. 1853. §OLpHAM, JAMES, C.E. Cottingham, near Hull. 1860. {O’Leary, Pr ofessor Purcell, M.A. Queenstown. 1863. {Oliver, Daniel, I.R.8., Professor of Botany in University College, London. Roy al Gardens, Kew, Surrey. 1874, {O’Meara, Rev. Eugene. Newcastle Rectory, Hazlehatch, Ireland. *OMMANNEY, Admiral Sir Erasmous, C.B., F. R. S., FRA. 8, F.R.G.S. The Towers, Yarmouth, Isle of W icht. 1872. {Onslow, D. Robert. New University” Club, St. James’s, London, S.W. 1867. {Orchar, James G. 9 William-street, Forebank, Dundee. 1842. OrmeErop, GEORGE Warerne, M. AY F.G.8S. — Brookbank, Teign- mouth. 1861. {Ormerod, Henry Mere: Clarence-street, Manchester; and 11 Wood- land-terrace, Cheetham Hill, Manchester. 1858. {Ormerod, T. T. Brighouse, near Halifax. 1835. Orprn, Joun H., LL.D., M.R.LA. 58 Stephen’s-green, Dublin. 1838. Orr, Alexander Smith. 57 Upper Sackville-street, Dublin. 1876. {Orr, John B. Granville-terrace, Crosshill, Glasgow. 1873. tOsborn, George. 47 Kingscross-street, Halifax. 1865. {Osborne, E. C. Carpenter-road, Edgbaston, Birmingham. *OstEr, A. Fotrerr, F.R.S. South Bank, Edgbaston, meer ee \ 1877. *Osler, Miss A. F. South Bank , Edgbaston, Birmingham. 1865. *Osler, Henry F. 50 Carpenter-road, Edgbaston, Birmingham. 1869. *Osler, , Sidney F, 1 Pownall-gardens, Hounslow, near London. 1854. Outram, Thomas. Greetland, near Halifax. OVERSTONE, SAMUEL J ONES Lrovn, Lord, F.G.8. 2 Carlton-gardens, London, S.W.; and Wickham Park, Bromley. 1870. tOwen, Harold. The Brook Villa, Liv erpool. 1857. {Owen, JamesH. Park House, Sandymount, Co. Dublin. Owen, Ricwarp, C.B., M.D., D.C.Li, ‘LL.D.; FiR:S., F.L.8.) FiG:S,,'- Hon. M. RSE, Director of the Natural-History Department, British Museum, Sheen Lodge, Mortlake, Surrey, 8.W.- « 1877.§§Oxland, Dr. Robert, F.C.S. 8 Portland-square, Plymouth. Year of LIST OF MEMBERS, — 59 ‘Eiection. 1859, }Paex, Davy, LL.D., F.R.S.E., F.G.8. College of Physical Science, Newcastle-upon-Tyne. . *Paget, Joseph. Stuffynwood Hall, Mansfield, Nottingham. {Paine, William Henry, M.D., F.G.S. Stroud, Gloucestershire, *Palgrave, R. H. Inglis. 11 Britannia-terrace, Great Yarmouth, . {Palmer, George. The Acacias, Reading, Berks. §Palmer, H. 76 Goldsmith-street, Nottingham. *Palmer, Joseph Edward. Lucan, Co. Dublin. §Palmer, William. Iron Foundry, Canal-street, Nottingham. *Palmer, W. R. 376 Coldharbour-lane, Stockwell, S.W. Palmes, Rey. William Lindsay, M.A. The Vicarage, Hornsea, Hull. . *Parker, Alexander, M.R.I.A. 59 William-street, Dublin. {Parker, Henry. Low Elswick, Newcastle-on-Tyne. . {Parker, Rey. Henry. Idlerton Rectory, Low Elswick, Newcastle-on- Tyne. y . {Parker, Henry R., LL.D. Methodist College, Belfast. Parker, Joseph, F.G.8. Upton Chaney, Bitton, near Bristol, Parker, Richard. Dunscombe, Cork. . *Parker, Walter Mantel. High-street, Alton, Hants. Parker, Rev. William. Saham, Norfolk. . {Parker, William. Thorton-le-Moor, Lincolnshire. . *Parkes, Samuel Hickling. 6 St. Mary’s-row, Birmingham... 1864.§§Parkes, Wittram. 23 Abinedon-street, Westminster, 8.W. 1859. {Parkinson, Robert, Ph.D. West View, Toller-lane, Bradford, York- 1862, 1877. 1865. 1878. 1878. 1875. 1855. 1861, 1871. 1863. 1867. 1876, 1874. 18638. 1865. 1867. 1864. 1863. 1863. 1864, 1877. » 1851. 1866. shire, *Parnell, John, M.A. Hadham House, Upper Clapton, London, E. Parnell, Richard, M.D., F.R.S.E. Gattonside Villa, Melrose, N.B. §Parson, T. Edecumbe. 36 Torrington-place, Plymouth. *Parsons, Charles Thomas. Norfolk-road, Edgbaston, Birmingham. §Parsons, Hon. C. A. 10 Connaught-place, London, W. §Parsons, Hon. R. C. 10 Connaught-place, London, W. {Pass, Alfred ©. 16 Redland Park, Clifton, Bristol. { Paterson, William. 100 Brunswick-street, Glasgow. {Patterson, Andrew. Deaf and Dumb School, Old Trafford, Man- chester. *Patterson, A. Henry. 3 Old-buildings, Lincoln’s Inn, London, W.C. tPatterson, H. L. Scott's House, near Newcastle-on-Tyne. {Patterson, James. JKinnettles, Dundee. §Patterson,T.L. Belmont, Margaret-street, Greenock. {Patterson, W. H., M.R.LA. 26 High-street, Belfast. {Pattinson, John. 75 The Side, Newcastle-on-Tyne. {Pattinson, William. Felling, near Newcastle-upon-Tyne. §Pattison, Samuel Rowles, F.G.S. 50 Lombard-street, London, E.C {Pattison, Dr. T. H. London-street, Edinburgh. }Pavn, Bensamin H., Ph.D. 1 Victoria-street, Westminster, 8. W. {Pavy, Frepertck Wrorram, M.D., F.R.S., Lecturer on Physiology and Comparative Anatomy and Zoology at Guy’s Hospital. 385 Grosvenor-street, London, W. {Payne, Edward Turner. 3 Sydney-place, Bath. §Payne, J. C. Charles. Botanic Avenue, Belfast. t Payne, Joseph. 4 Kildare-gardens, Bayswater, London, W. tPayne, Dr. Joseph F. 4 Kildare-gardens, Bayswater, London, W. 1876.§§Peace, G. H. Morton Grange, Eccles, near Manchester. 1847, {Pnacu, Cuartes W., Pres. R.P.S. Edin., A.L.S. 380 Haddington-: place, Leith-walk, Edinburgh. 60 LIST OF MEMBERS. Year of Election. 1875. {Peacock, Thomas Francis. 12 South-square, Gray’s Inn, London, W.C. 1876. {Pearce, W. Elmpark House, Govan, Glasgow. *Pearsall, Thomas John, F.C.S. Birkbeck Literary and Scientific Institution, Southampton-buildings, Chancery-lane, London, W.C. 1875. {Pearson, H. W. Tramore Villa, Nugent Hill, Cotham, Bristol. 1872. *Pearson, Joseph, Lern Side Works, Nottingham. 1870, {Pearson, Rev. Samuel. 48 Prince’s-road, Liverpool. 1863, §Pease, H. F. Brinkburn, Darlington. 1863. *Pease, Joseph W., M.P. Hutton Hall, near Guisborough. 1863. {Pease, J. W. Newcastle-on-Tyne. 1858. *Pease, Thomas, F.G.S. Cote Bank, Westbury-on-Trym, near Bristol. Peckitt, Henry. Carlton Husthwaite, Thirsk, Yorkshire. 1855. *Peckover, Alexander, F.L.S., F.R.G.S. Harecroft House, Wisbech, Cambridgeshire. *Peckover, Algernon, F.L.S. Sibald’s Holme, Wisbech, Cam- bridgeshire. 1878, *Peek, William. St. Clair, Hayward’s Heath, Sussex. 1867, *Peel, George. Soho Iron Works, Manchester. tPeel, Thomas. 9 Hampton-place, Bradford, Yorkshire. *Peile, George, jun. Shotley Bridge, Co. Durham. *Peiser, John. Barnfield House, 491 Oxford-street, Manchester. §Pemberton, Charles Seaton. 44 Lincoln's Inn-fields, London, W.C. E {Pemberton, Oliver. 18 Temple-row, Birmingham. . “Pender, John, M.P. 18 Arlington-street, London, S.W. {Pendergast, Thomas. Lancefield, Cheltenham. . §Pencetty, WitiiaM, F.R.S., F.G.S. Lamorna, Torquay. {Percival, Rey. J., M.A., LL.D. The College, Clifton, Bristol. {Pzrcy, Joun, M.D., F.R.S., ¥.G.S., Professor of Metallurgy in the Royal School of Mines. Museum of Practical Geology, Jermyn- street, S.W.; and 1 Gloucester-crescent, Hyde Park, London, W. *Perigal, Frederick. Thatched House Club, St. James’s-street, London, 8. W. “Perkin, WittrAM Huyry, F.R.S., F.C.S. The Chestnuts, Sudbury, Harrow. { Perkins, Rev. George. St. James's View, Dickenson-road, Rusholme, near Manchester. §Perkins, Loftus. 140 Abbey-road, Kilburn, London, N.W. Perkins, Rey. R. B., D.C.L. Wotton-under-Edge, Gloucester- shire. . *Perkins, V. R. The Brands, Wotton-under-Edge, Gloucestershire. . [Perring, John Shae. 104 King-street, Manchester. Perry, The Right Rey. Charles, M.A., D.D. 82 Avenue-road,. Regent’s Park, London, N.W. . {Perry, John. 5 Falls-road, Belfast. *Perry, Rey. S.G. F., M.A. Tottington Vicarage, near Bury. *Prrry, Rev. 8. J., F-R.S., F.R.AS., F.M.S. Stonyhurst College Observatory, Whalley, Blackburn. *Petrie, John. South-street, Rochdale. Peyton, Abel. Oakhurst, Edgbaston, Birmingham. *Peyton, John E. H., F.R.A.S., F.G.S. 108 Marina, St. Leonard’s- on-Sea. {Puayre, Lieut.-General Sir Anruur, K.C.S.1.,C.B. Governor of Mauritius. LIST OF MEMBERS, " “GE Year of Election. 1863. *PuEné, Jonn Samvet, LL.D.,F.S.A., F.G.8., F.R.G.S. 5 Carlton- terrace, Oakley-street, London, S.W. 1870. {Philip, T. D, 51 South Castle-street, Liverpool. 1853. *Philips, Rev. Edward. Hollington, Uttoxeter, Staffordshire. 1853. *Philips, Herbert. 35 Church-street, Manchester. *Philips, Mark. Welcombe, Stratford-on-A von. Philips, Robert N. The Park, Manchester. 1863. {Philipson, Dr. 1 Savile-row, Newcastle-on-Tyne. 1859. *Puitirs, Major-General Sir B. TRAvELL. United Service Club, Pall Mall, London, 8S. W. 1862. {Phillips, Rev. George, D.D. Queen’s College, Cambridge. 1872. {Puitiies, J. AntHUR. Cressington Park, Aigburth, Liverpool. 1877. §Phillips, Tl. Wishart. 269 West Ferry-road, London, E, 1868. {Phipson, R. M., F.S.A. Surrey-street, Norwich. 1868. {Purpson, T. L., Ph.D. 4 The Cedars, Putney, Surrey, S.W. 1864. {Pickering, William. Oak View, Clevedon. 1861. {Pickstone, William. Radcliff Bridge near Manchester. 1870.§§Picton, J. Allanson, F.S.A. Sandyknowe, Wavertree, Liverpool. 1870. {Pigot, Rev. E. V. Malpas, Cheshire. 1871. {Pigot, Thomas F., C.E., M.R.LA. Royal College of Science, Dublin. *Pike, Ebenezer. Besborough, Cork. 1865, {Prxz, L. OwEn. 25 Carlton-villas, Maida-vale, London, W. 18735. §Pike, W. H. 4 The Grove, Highgate, London, N. 1857. {Pilkington, Henry M., M.A.,Q.C. 45 Upper Mount-street, Dublin. 1863, *Prm, Captain Beprorp C. T., R.N., M.P., F.R.G.S. Leaside, Kings- wood-road, Upper Norwood, London, 8.E: Pim, George, M.R.I.A. Brenanstown, Cabinteely, Co. Dublin. Pim, Jonathan. Harold’s Cross, Dublin. 1877. §Pim, Joseph T. Greenbank, Monkstown, Co. Dublin. Pim, William H., M.R.L.A. Monkstown, Co. Dublin. 1868. {Pinder, T. R. St. Andrews, Norwich. 1876, {Pirie, Rev. G. Queen’s College Cambridge. 1859. {Pirrie, William, M.D., LL.D. 238 Union-street West, Aberdeen. 1866. {Pitcairn, David. Dudhope House, Dundee. 1875. {Pitman, John. Redcliff Hill, Bristol. 1864, {Pitt, R. 5 Widcomb-terrace, Bath. 1869. §Prant, Jamus, F.G.S. 40 West-terrace, West-street, Leicester. 1865. {Plant, Thomas L. Camp Hill, and 33 Union-street, Birmingham. 1842, Prayrarr, The Right Hon. Lyon, C.B., Ph.D., LL.D., MP., F.RS.L. & E., F.C.S. 68 Onslow-gardens, South Kensington, London, 8. W. 1867, {Puayrarr, Lieut.-Colonel R. L., H.M. Consul, Algeria. (Messrs. King & Co., Pall Mall, London, 8. W.) 1857. {Plunkett, Thomas. Ballybrophy House, Borris-in-Ossory, Ireland. 1861. *Pocuin, Henry Davis, F.C.S._Bodnant Hall, near Conway. 1846, {Porr, Wrt11am, Mus. Doc., F.R.S., M.LC.E, Atheneum Club, Pall Mall, London, S.W. * Pollexfen, Rev. John Hutton, M.A, Middleton Tyas Vicarage, Richmond, Yorkshire. Pollock, A. 52 Upper Sackville-street, Dublin. 1862, *Polwhele, Thomas Roxburgh, M.A., F.G.S. Polwhele, Truro, Cornwall. 1854, {Poole, Braithwaite. Birkenhead. 1868. { Pooley, Thomas A., B.Sc. South Side, Clapham Common, London, SW. 1868. {Portal, Wyndham 8. Malsanger, Basingstoke. 1874, {Porter, Rey. J. Leslie, D.D., LL.D, College Park, Belfast. 62 LIST OF MEMBERS. Year of Election. -1866, 1863, 1842. 1863. 1857. 1873. 1875 1857. 1867. 1855. 1869. 1871. 1856, 1872. 1875. 1870. 1875. §Porter, Robert. Beeston, Nottingham. Porter, Rey. T, H., D.D., MR.LA. inllglided>, Co. Tyrone, {Potter, D. M. Cramlington, near Newcastle-on-Tyne. *Porrer, Epmund, F.R.S. Camfield-place, Hatfield, Herts, Potter, Thomas. George-street, Manchester. tPotts, "James, 26 Sandhill, Newcastle-on-Tyne. *PoUNDEN, Captain LonspAzE, F.R.G.S. Junior United Service Club, St. James’s-square, London, 8.W.; and Brownswood House, Enniscorthy, Co. Wexford. *Powell, Francis 8. Horton Old Hall, Yorkshire; and 1 Cambridge- square, London, W. }Powell, William Augustus Frederick. Norland House, Clifton, Bristol. {Power, Sir James, Bart. Hdermine, Enniscorthy, Ireland. tPowrie, James. Reswallie, Forfar. ae John E, Clyde Neuck, Uddingstone, Hamilton, Scot- land. *Preece, William Henry. Gothic Lodge, Wimbledon Common, London, 8. W. Prest, The Venerable Archdeacon Edward. The College, Durham. *Prestwich, JosepH, M.A., F.R.S., F.G.S., F.C.S., Professor of Geology in the University of Oxford. 34 Broad-street, Oxford ; and Shoreham, near Sevenoaks. tPrice, Astley Paston. 47 Lincoln’s-Inn-Fields, London, W.O. *Pricr, Rev. Barrnotomew, M.A., F.R.S., F.R.A.S., Sedleian Professor of Natural Philosophy in the University of Oxford. 11 St. Giles’s, Oxford. tPrice, Dayid S., Ph.D. 26 Great George-street, Westminster, S.W Price, J. "T. Neath Abbey, Glamorganshire. *Price, Rees. 54 Loftus-road, Shepherd's s Bush, London, W. *Price, Captain W. E., M.P., F.G.S. . Tibberton Court, Gloucester. *Price, William Philip. Tibberton Court, Gloucester. 1876.§§ Priestley, John. Lloyd-street, Greenheys, Manchester. 187 1846, 5. tPrince, Thomas. 6 Marlborough-road, Bradford, Yorkshire. 1864. 1835. *Prior, R. C. A., M.D. 48 York-terrace, Regent's Park, London, N.W. *Pritchard, ‘Andrew, F.RS.E. 87 St. Paul’ s-road, Canonbury, Lon- don, N. *Prrrcwarp, Rev. CHArzes, M.A., F.RS., F.G.S., F.R.A.S., Professor of Astronomy in the University of Oxford. 8 Keble-terrace, Oxford. . {Pritchard, Rey. W. Gee. Brignal Rectory, Barnard Castle, Co.. Durham. . “PrircHaRD, Ursan, M.D., F.R.C.S. 8 George-street, Hanover- square, London, W. . tProctor, R. 5. Summerhill-terrace, Newcastle-on-Tyne. Proctor, Thomas. Elmsdale House, Clifton Down, Bristol. Proctor, William. Elmhurst, Higher Erith-road, Torquay. . §Proctor, William, M.D., F.C. 8. 24 Petergate, York. 53. “Prosser, Thomas. West Boldon, Newcastle-on-Tyne. 3. {Proud, ‘Joseph. South Hetton, Newcastle-on Tyne. . {Prowse, Albert P. Whitchurch Villa, Mannamead, Plymouth, . *Pryor, M. Robert. Western Manor, Stevenage, Herts, *Puckle, Thomas John. Woodcote-grove, Carshalton, Surrey, 73. {Pullan, Lawrence. Bridge of Allan, N.B. 57. tPullar, John. 4 St. Leonard Bank, Perth. . *Pullar, Robert. 6 St. Leonard Bank, Perth, LIST OF MEMBERS. 63" Year of Election. 1842. *Pumphrey, Charles. Southfield, King’s Norton, near Birmingham, Punnet; Rey. John, M.A., F.C.P.S. St. Earth, Cornwall. 1852. {Purdon, Thomas Henry, M.I). Belfast. 1860. {Purpy, Freprricx, F.8.8., Principal of the Statistical Department of the Poor Law Board, Whitehall, London. Victoria-road, Ken-- sington, London, W. 1874. {Purspr, Freprrick, M.A. Rathmines, Dublin. 1866. {PuRsER, Professor Jonny, M.A., M.R.I.A. Queen’s College, Belfast. 1878. §Purser, John Mallet. 3 Wilton-terrace, Dublin. 1860. *Pusey, S. E. B. Bouverie. Pusey House, Faringdon. 1868, §Pyzn-Smirn, P. H., M.D. 56 Havrley-street, W.; and Guy’s Hos- pital, London, 8.E. 1861, *Pyne, Joseph John. St. German’s Villa, St. Lawrence-road, Not- ting Hill, London, W. 1870. {Rabbits, W. T. Forest Hill, London, S.E. 1860. {Rapciirre, CHARrtEs Branp, M.D. 25 Cavendish-square, London, W.. 1870. {Radcliffe, D. R. Phoenix Safe Works, Windsor, Liverpool. 1877.§§ Radford, George D. Mannamead, Plymouth. *Radford, William, M.D. Sidmount, Sidmouth. 1854, {Rafiles, Thomas Stamford. 15 Abercromby-square, Liverpool. 1870. {Raffles, William Winter. Sunnyside, Prince’s Park, Liverpool. 1864. {Rainey, James T. St. George’s Lodge, Bath. Rake, Joseph. Charlotte-street, Bristol. 1863. {Ramsay, ALpxanpER, F'.G.S. ilmorey Lodge, 6 Kent-gardens, Ealing, W. 1845. {Ramsay, AnpREw Crompis, LL.D., F.R.S., F.G.S., Director- General of the Geological Survey of the United Kingdom and of the Museum of Economic Geology. Geological Survey Office, Jermyn-street, London, 8. W. 1867. {Ramsay, James, jun. Dundee. 1861. {Ramsay, John, M.P. Kildalton, Argyleshire. 1867. *Ramsay, W.F., M.D. 61 Overstone-road, Hammersmith, London, W, 1876. {Ramsay, William, Ph.D. 11 Ashton-terrace, Glasgow. 1873. *Ramsden, William. Bracken Hall, Great Horton, Bradford, York- shire. 1835. *Rance, Henry (Solicitor). Cambridge. 1869. *Rance, H. W. Henniker, LL.M. 62 St. Andrew’s-street, Cambridge. 1860. {Randall, Thomas. Gyrandepoint House, Oxford. 1865. {Randel, J. 50 Vittoria-street, Birmingham, 1855. { Randolph, Charles. Pollockshiels, Glasgow. Ranelagh, The Right Hon, Lord. 7 New Burlington-street, Regent- street, London, W. 1868. *Ransom, Edwin, F.R.G.S. Kempstone Mill, Bedford. 1863. §Ransom, William Henry, M.D., F.R.S. The Pavement, Nottingham. 1861, {Ransome, Arthur, M.A. Bowdon, Manchester. Ransome, Thomas. 54 Princess-street, Manchester. 1872, *Ranyard, Arthur Cowper, F.R.A.S. 25 Old-square, Lincoln’s Inn, London, W.C. Rashlei¢h, Jonathan. 3 Cumberland-terrace, Regent’s Park, London. N.W. Ratcrrrr, Colonel Cuarrezs, F.L.S., F.G.S., F.S.A,, F.R.G.S. Wyd- drington, Edgbaston, Birmingham. 1864, {Rate, Rev. John, M.A. Lapley Vicarage, Penkridge, Staffordshire, 1870. {Rathbone, Benson. Exchange-buildings, Liverpool. 1870. {Rathbone, Philip H. Greenbank Cottage, Wavertree, Liverpool, 1870, §Rathhone, R, R. Beechwood House, Liverpool, 64 LIST OF MEMBERS. Year of Election. 1863. {Rattray, W. St. Clement’s Chemical Works, Aberdeen. 1874. {Ravenstein, E. G., F.R.G.S. 10 Lorn-road, Brixton, London, S.W. Rawdon, William Frederick, M.D. Bootham, York. 1870. {Rawlins, G. W. The Hollies, Rainhall, Liverpool. *Rawlins, John. Shrawley Wood House, near Stourport. 1866. *Rawxinson, Rev. Canon Grorcr, M.A., Camden Professor of An- cient History in the University of Oxford. The Oaks, Precincts, Canterbury. 1855. *Raw.rnson, Major-General Sir Henry C., K.C.B., LL.D., F.B.S., F.R.G.S. 21 Charles-street, Berkeley-square, London, W. 1875. §Rawson, Sir Rawson W., K.C.M.G.,C.B. Drayton House, West Drayton, Middlesex. 1868. *RayiEteH, The Right Hon. Lord, M.A., F.R.S., F.R.G.S. 4 Carlton- gardens, Pall Mall, London,S.W.; and Terling Place, Witham, Essex. 1865. { Rayner, Henry. West View, Liverpool-road, Chester. 1870, {Rayner, Joseph (Town Clerk). Liverpool. 1852. {Read, Thomas, M.D. Donegal-square West, Belfast. 1865. {Read, William. Albion House, Epworth, Bawtry. *Read, W. H. Rudston, M.A., F.L.8. 12 Blake-street, York. 1870. §ReApE, THomas Metiarp, C.H., F.G.S. Blundellsands, Liverpool. 1862. *Readwin, Thomas Allison, M.R.IA., F.G.S. 28 Bold-street, Alex- andra-road, Manchester. 1852. *Reprern, Professor Peter, M.D. 4 Lower-crescent, Belfast. 1863. {Redmayne, Giles. 20 New Bond-street, London, W. 1863. {Redmayne, R. R. 12 Victoria-terrace, Newcastle-on-Tyne. Redwood, Isaac. Oae Wern, near Neath, South Wales. 1861. {Reep, Epwarp J., C.B., M.P., F.R.S. 74 Gloucester-road, South Kensington, London, W. 1875. {Rees-Mogg, W. Wooldridge. Cholwell House, near Bristol. 1876.§§Reid, James. 10 Woodside-terrace, Glasgow. 1874. {Reid, Robert, M.A. 35 Dublin-road, Belfast. 1850. {Reid, William, M.D. Cruivie, Cupar, Fife. 1875. §Reinold, A. W., M.A., Professor of Physical Science. Royal Naval College, Greenwich, S.E. 1863. §Renats, E. ‘ Nottingham Express’ Office, Nottingham. 1863. {Rendel, G. Benwell, Newcastle-on-Tyne. 1867. {Renny, W. W. 8 Douglas-terrace, Broughty Ferry, Dundee. 1871. {Reynotps, JAmes Emurson, M.A., F.0.S., M.R.LA., Professor of Chemistry in the University of Dublin. The Laboratory, Trinity College, Dublin. 1870. *Reynotps, Ospornz, M.A., F.R.S., Professor of Engineering in Owens College, Manchester. Fallowfield, Manchester, 1858. §Reynotps, Ricwarp, FC.S. 13 Briggate, Leeds. 1858. *Rhodes, John. 18 Albion-street, Leeds. 1877. §Rhodes, John. 358 Blackburn-road, Accrington, Lancashire. 1877. *Riccardi, Dr. Paul, Secretary of the Society of Naturalists. Via Stimmate, 15, Modena, Italy. 1868.§§RicHarps, Vice-Admiral Sir Grorer H., C.B., F.R.S., F.R.G.S. The Athenzeum Club, London, 8. W. 1863. {Ricnarpson, Bensamry Warp, M.A., M.D., F.R.S. 12 Hinde- street, Manchester-square, London, W. 1861.§§Richardson, Charles. 10 Berkeley-square, Bristol. 1869. *Richardson, Charles. Albert Park, Abingdon, Berks. 1863. *Richardson, Edward. 6 Stanley-terrace, Gosforth, Newcastle-on- Tyne. LIST OF MEMBERS. 65 Year of Election. 1868. *Richardson, George. 4 Edward-street, Werneth, Oldham. 1870. {Richardson, J. H. 3 Arundel-terrace, Cork. 1870, {Richardson, Ralph. 16 Coates-crescent, Edinburgh. Richardson, Thomas. Montpelier-hill, Dublin. 1861. {Richardson, William. 4 Edward-street, Werneth, Oldham. 1876.§§Richardson, William Haden. City Glass Works, Glasgow. 1861. {Richson, Rev. Canon, M.A. Shakespeare-street, Ardwick, Man- chester. 1863. {Richter, Otto, Ph.D. 6 Derby-terrace, Glasgow 1870. {Rickards, Dr. 36 Upper Parliament-street, Liverpool. 1868. §Rickerrs, CHartes, M.D., F.G.S.. 22 Argyle-street, Birken- head. * 1877.§§Ricketts, James, M.D. St. Helen’s, Lancashire. *RIppELL, Major-General Cuartzs J. Bucnanay, C.B., R.A., F.R.S. Oaklands, Chudleigh, Devon. } 1861. *Riddell, Henry B. Whitefield House, Rothbury, Morpeth. 1872. {Ridge, James. 98 Queen’s-road, Brighton. 1862. {Ridgway, Henry Ackroyd, B.A. . Bank Field, Halifax. 1861. tRidley, John. 19 Belsize-park, Hampstead, London, N.W. 1863. *Rigby, Samuel. Bruche Hall, Warrington. 1873. {Ripley, Edward. Acacia, Apperley, near Leeds. 1873.§§Ripley, H. W. Acacia, Apperley, near Leeds. *Ripon, The Most Hon. the Marquis of, K.G., D.C.L., F.R.S., F.L.S., F.R.G.S. 1 Carlton-gardens, London, 8. W. 1860. { Ritchie, George Robert. 4 Watkyn-terrace, Coldharbour-lane, Cam- berwell, London, S.E. 1867. {Ritchie, John. Fleuchar Craig, Dundee. 1855. {Ritchie, Robert, C.E. 14 Hill-street, Edinburgh. 1867. {Ritchie, William. Emslea, Dundee. 1869. *Rivington, John. Babbicombe, near Torquay. 1854, {Robberds, Rev. John, B.A. Battledown Tower, Cheltenham. 1869. *Rossins, Joun, F.C.S. 57 Warrington-crescent, Maida Vale, London, WwW Roberton, John. Oxford-road, Manchester. 1878. §Roberts, Charles, F.R.C.S. 2 Bolton-row, London, W. 1859. {Roberts, George Christopher. Hull. 1859. {Roberts, Henry, F.S.A. Athenzeum Club, London, S.W. 1870. *Roberts, Isaac, F.G.S. Kennessee, Maghull, Lancashire. 1857. {Roberts, Michael, M.A. Trinity College, Dublin. 1868. §Roserts, W. CuHanpier, F.R.S., F.G.S., F.C.S. Royal Mint, London, E. 1866. {Robertson, Alister Stuart, M.D., F.R.G.S. Horwich, Bolton, Lan- cashire. 1876. tRobertson, Andrew Carrick. Woodend House, Helensburgh, N.B. 1859. {Robertson, Dr. Andrew. Indego, Aberdeen. 1867. §Robertson, David. Union Grove, Dundee. 1871. tRobertson, George, O.E., F.R.S.E. 47 Albany-street, Edinburgh. 1870. *Robertson, John. Lyme View, Whalley Range, Manchester. 1876. {Robertson, R. A. 9 Queen’s-square, Regent Park, Glasgow. 1866, tRoprrtson, Wittiam Trnpat, M.D. Nottingham. 1861. {Robinson, Enoch. Dukinfield, Ashton-under-Lyne. 1852. {Robinson, Rev. George: Tartaragham Glebe, Loughgall, Ireland. 1859. {Robinson, Hardy. 156 Union-street, Aberdeen. *Robinson, H. Oliver. 34 Bishopsgate-street, London, E.C. 1873. §Robinson, Hugh. 82 Donegall-street, Belfast. 1861. {Robinson, John. Atlas Works, Manchester. 1863, {Robinson, J. H. Cumberland-row, Newcastle-on-Tyne. F 66 LIST OF MEMBERS. Year of Election. 1878. §Robinson, John L., C.E. 198 Great Brunswick-street, London, W. 1876, {Robinson, M. E. 6 Park-circus, Glasgow. 1875. *Robinson, Robert, C.E. 2 West-terrace, Darlington. 1860. tRobinson, Admiral Sir Robert Spencer, K.C.B., F.R.S. 61 Eatau- place, London, S.W. ; Rosrnson, Rev. Tuomas Romngy, D.D., F.RS., F.RAS., Hon. F.R.S.E., M.R.1.A., Director of the Armagh Observatory. Armagh, 1863. {Robinson, T. W. U. Houghton-le-Spring, Durham. 1870, tRobinson, William. 40 Smithdown-road, Liverpool. 1870. *Robson, E. R. 41 Parliament-street, Westminster, S.W. 1876.§§Robson, Hazleton R. 14 Royal-crescent West, Glasgow. * Robson, Rev. John, M.A., D.D. Ajmere Lodge, Cathkin-road, Lang- side, Glasgow. 1855. tRobson, Neil, C.E. 127 St. Vincent-street, Glasgow. 1872. *Robson, William. Marchholm, Gillsland-road, Merchiston, Edin- bureh. 1872. §Ropwett, Grorcz F., F.R.AS., F.0.8. Marlborough College, Wiltshire. 1866. {Roe, Thomas. Grove-villas, Sitchurch. 1861. tRorsr, Joun, F.G.S. 9 Crosbie-terrace, Leamington. 1860, tRocrrs, James E. Toorop, Professor of Economic Science and Statistics in King’s College, London. Beaumont-street, Ox- ford. 1867. tRogers, James S. Rosemill, by Dundee. 1869. *Rogers, Nathaniel, M.D. 87 South-street, Exeter. 1870. {Rogers, T. L., M.D. Rainhill, Liverpool. 1859, tRoriesron, Grorex, M.A., M.D., F.R.S., F.L.S., Professor of Ana- tomy and Physiology in the University of Oxford. The Park, Oxford. 1876. §Rollit, A. K.,B.A., LL.D., F.R.A.S. The Literary and Philosophical Society, Hull. 1866. {Rolph, George Frederick. War Office, Horse Guards, London, S.W 1876, {Romanes, George John, M.A., F.L.S. 18 Cornwall-terrace, Regent’s Park, London, N.W. 1863. tRomilly, Edward. 14 Hyde Park-terrace, London, W. 1846. tRonalds, Edmund, Ph.D. Stewartfield, Bonnington, Edinburgh. 1869. tRoper, C. H. Magdalen-street, Exeter. 1872. *Roper, Freeman Clarke Samuel, F.L.S., F.G.S. Palgrave House, Eastbourne. 1855. *Roscoz, Henry Enrrerp, B.A., Ph.D., F.R.S., F.C.S., Professor of Chemistry in Owens College, Manchester. 1863. tRoseby, John. Haverholm House, Brigg, Lincolnshire. 1874. tRoss, Alexander Milton, M.A., M.D., F.G.S. Toronto, Canada. 1857. tRoss, David, LL.D. 32 Nelson-street, Dublin. 1872. tRoss, James, M.D. Tenterfield House, Waterfvot, near Manchester. 1859. *Ross, Rev. James Coulman. Baldon Vicarage, Oxford. 1874. tRoss, Rev. William. Chapelhill Manse, Rothesay, Scotland. 1869, *Ros3r, The Right Hon. the Earl of, B.A., D.O.L., F.R.S., F.R.A.S., M.R.LA. Birr Castle, Parsonstown, Ireland; and 32 Lowndes- square, London, S.W. 1865. *Rothera, George Bell. 17 Waverley-street, Nottingham. 1876.§§Rottenburgh, Paul. 13 Albion-crescent, Glasgow. 1861. tRouth, Edward J., M.A., V.RS., F.RAS., F.G.S. St. Peter's College, Cambridge. ; LIST OF MEMBERS. 67 Year of Election. 1872. *Row, A. V. Nursing Observatory, Daba-gardens, Vizagapatam, India, (Care of Messrs. King & Oo., 45 Pall Mall, London, S.W. 1861. tRowan, Doyial Elliot-street, Glasgow. 1876. {Rowan, David. 22 Woodside-place, Glasgow. 1877. §Rowe, J. Brooking, F.L.S. 16 Lockyer-street, Plymouth. 1865. §Rowe, Rev. John, Load Vicarage, Langport, Somerset, 1855, *Rownry, Tuomas H., Ph.D., F.C.S., Professor of Chemistry in Queen’s College Galway. Salerno, Salthill, Galway. *Rowntree, Joseph. 12 Heslington-road, York. 1862. {Rowsell, Rey. Evan Edward, M.A. Hambledon Rectory, Godal- ming. 1876. {Roxburgh, John. 7 Royal Bank-terrace, Glasgow. 1861. *Royle, Peter, M.D., L.R.C.P., M.R.C.S. 27 Leyer-street, Man- chester. 1875. {Riicker, A. W., M.A., Professor of Mathematics and Physics in the Yorkshire College, Leeds. 1869, §Rudler, F. W., F.G.S. Professor of Chemistry and Mineralogy in _ University College, Aberystwith. 1873. {Rushforth, Joseph. 43 Ash-grove, Horton-lane, Bradford, York- shire. 1847. {Ruskin, Jonny, M.A., F.G.S., Slade Professor of Fine Arts in the University of Oxford. Corpus Christi College, Oxford. 1857. {Russell, The Very Rev. C. W., D.D., M.R.ILA. Maynooth College. 1875. *Russell, The Hon. F, A. R. Pembroke Lodge, Richmond Park, Surrey. 1876. *Russell, George. 103 Blenheim-crescent, Notting Hill, London, W. 1865. {Russell, James, M.D. 91 Newhall-street, Birmingham. Russell, John. 39 Mountjoy-square, Dublin, RussExL, Joun Scorr, M.A., F.R.S. L. & E. Sydenham, S.E. ; and 5 Westminster-chambers, London, 8.W. 1852. *Russell, Norman Scott. 5 Westminster-chambers, London, S.W. 1876. §Russell, R., C.E., F.G.S. 1 Sea View, St. Bees, Carnforth. 1862. §RusseLt, W. H. L., A.B., F.R.S. 5 The Grove, Highgate, Lon- don, N. : 1852. *Russett, Wit11aM J., Ph.D., F.R.S., F.C.S., Professor of Chemistry, St. Bartholomew’s Medical College. 34 Upper Hamilton- terrace, St. John’s Wood, London, N.W. 1875.§§Rutherford, David Greig. Surrey House, Forest Hill, London, S.E. 1871, §RurneRForD, Wir11aM, M.D., F.R.S., F.R.S.E., Professor of the Institutes of Medicine in the University of Edinburgh. Rutson, William. Newby Wiske, Northallerton, Yorkshire. 1875. {Ryalls, Charles Wager, LL.D. 3 Brick-court, Temple, London, E.C. 1874, §Rye, ee F.Z.S., Librarian R.G.S. 70 Charlewood-road, Putney, S.W. 1865, tRyland, Thomas. The Redlands, Erdington, Birmingham. - 1861. *Ryzanps, Tomas GuiazEBRoox, F.L.S., F.G.S. Highfields, Thel- wall, near Warrington, *Sabine, General Sir Epwarp, K.C.B., R.A., LL.D., D.C.L., F.R.S., F.R.A.S., F.L.S., F.R.G.S. 13 Ashley-place, Westminster, 8. W. 1865. {Sabine, Robert. Auckland House, Willesden-lane, London, N.W. 1871, §Sadler, Samuel Champernowne. Purton Court, Purton,near Swindon, Wiltshire. 1866, *St. Albans, His Grace the Duke of. Bestwood Lodge, Arnold, near Nottingham, Salkeld, Joseph, Penrith, Cumberland, F 2 68 LIST OF MEMBERS. Year of Election. 1857. 18738, 1872. 1842. 1861. 1867. 1870. 1861. 1876. 1878. 1857. 1872. 1871. {Satmon, Rev. Grorex, D.D., D.C.L., F.R.S., Regius Professor of Divinity in the University of Dublin. Trinity College, Dublin. *Salomons, Sir David, Bart. Broomhill, Tunbridge Wells. {Satviy, Ospert, M.A., F.R.S., F.L.S. Brookland Avenue, Cam- bridge. Sambrooke, T. G. 32 EHaton-place, London, 8. W. *Samgon, Henry. 6 St. Peter’s-square, Manchester. tSamuelson, Edward. Roby, near Liverpool. tSamuelson, James. St. Domingo-grove, Everton, Liverpool. *Sandeman, Archibald, M.A. Tulloch, Perth. §Sandeman, David. Woodlands, Lenzie, Glasgow. §Sanders, Alfred, F.L.S. 2 Clarence-place, Gravesend, Kent. tSanders, Gilbert. The Hill, Monkstown, Co. Dublin. {Sanders, Mrs. 8 Powis-square, Brighton. tSanders, William R., M.D. 11 Walker-street, Edinburgh. 1872.§§Sanperson, J. S. Burpon, M.D., F.R.S., Professor of Physiology 1864, 1854. 1873. 1865. 1868. 1846. 1564. 1860. 1871. 1863, 1872. 1868. 1850. 1862. 1842. 1874, in University College, London. 49 Queen Anne-street, London, WwW Sandes, T homas, A.B. Sallow Glin, Tarbert, Co. Kerry.. {Sandford, William. 9 Springfield-place, Bath. {Sandon, The Right Hon. Lord, M.P. 39 Gloucester-square, London, W. {Sands, T. C. 24 Spring-gardens, Bradford, Yorkshire. {Sargant, W. L. Edmund-street, Birmingham. {Saunders, A.,C.E. King’s Lynn. tSaunpeErs, TRELAWNEY W. India Office, London, S.W. {Saunders, T. W., Recorder of Bath. 1 Priory-place, Bath. *Saunders, William. 3 Gladstone-terrace, Brighton. §Savage, W. D. Ellerslie House, Brighton. {Savory, Valentine. Cleckheaton, near Leeds. *Sawyer, George David. 55 Buckingham-place, Brighton. {Sawyer, John Robert. Grove-terrace, Thorpe Hamlet, Norwich. tScarth, Pillans. 2 James’s-place, Leith. §Schacht, G. F. 7 Regent’s-place, Clifton, Bristol. Schofield, Joseph. Stubley Hall, Littleborough, Lancashire. §Scholefield, Henry. Windsor-crescent, Newcastle-on-Tyne. *Scholes, T. Seddon. 10 Warwick-place, Leamington. 1876.§§Schuman, Sigismond. 7 Royal Bank-place, Glasgow. 1873. 1861. 1847, 1867. 1878, 1876, 1871. 1876. 1872. 1871. 1857. Scuunck, Epwarp, F.R.S., F.C.S. Oaklands, Kersall Moor, Man- chester. *Scuuster, ARTHUR, Ph.D. Sunnyside, Upper Avenue-road, Regent’s Park, London, N.W. *Schwabe, Edmund Salis. Ryecroft House, Cheetham Hill, Man- chester. ’ *Sorarer, Pamir Luriry, M.A., Ph.D., F.R.S., F.LS., Sec. Zool. Soc. (GunERAL SeEcrerary.) 11 Hanover-square, London, W. {Scorr, ALEXANDER. Clydesdale Bank, Dundee. §Scott, Arthur William. St. David’s College, Lampeter. {Scott, Mr. Bailie. Glasgow. {Scott, Rev. C.G. 12 Pilrig-street, Edinburgh. tScott, D. D. Glasgow. {Scott, Major-General H. Y. D., O.B., R.E., F.R.S. Sunnyside, Ealing, W. {Scott, James 8S. T. Monkrigg, Haddingtonshire. *Scorr, Roperr H., M.A., F.R.S., F.G.S., F.MS., Secretary to the Council of the Meteorological Office. 116 Victoria-street, London, 8S. W. _ LIST OF MEMBERS. Go Year of Election. 1861. §Scott, Rev. Robert Selkirk, D.D. 16 Victoria-crescent, Dowanhi!!, Glasgow. 1874. {Scott, Rev. Robinson, D.D. Methodist College, Belfast. 1864, {Scott, Wentworth Lascelles. Wolverhampton. 1858. {Scott, William. Holbeck, near Leeds. 1869. §Scott, William Bower. Chudleigh, Devon. 1859. {Seaton, John Love. Hull. 1877.§§Seaton, Robert Cooper, B.A. Dulwich College, Dulwich, Surrey,S.E. 1861. *SrELEY, Harry Govisr, F.L.S., F.G.S., F.R.G.S., F.Z.S., Professor of Geography in King’s College, London. 61 Adelaide-road, South Hampstead, London, N.W. 1855, {Seligman, H. L. 135 Buchanan-street, Glasgow. 1873. {Semple, R. H., M.D. 8 Torrington-square, London, W.C. 1858. *Senior, George, F.8.S. Rosehill Lodge, Dodworth, near Barnsley. 1870, *Sephton, Rev. J. 92 Huskisson-street, Liverpool. 1875, §Seville, Thomas. Elm House, Royton, near Manchester. 1873.§§Sewell, Rev. E., M.A., F.G.S., F.R.G.S. - Ilkley College, near Leeds. 1868. {Sewell, Philip E. Catton, Norwich. 1861. *Seymour, Henry D. 209 Piccadilly, London, W. 1853. {Shackles,G. L. 6 Albion-street, Hull. “Shaen, William. 15 Upper Phillimore-gardens, Kensington, Lon- don, W. 1871. *Shand, James. Fullbrooks, Worcester Park, Surrey. 1867. §Shanks, James. Den Ivon Works, Arbroath, N.B. 1869, *Shapter, Dr. Lewis, LL.D. The Barnfield, Exeter. 1878. §Sharp, David. Thornhill, Dumfriesshire. Sharp, Rev. John, B.A. Horbury, Wakefield. 1861. {SHarp, Samvuet, F.G.8., F.S.A. Great Harrowden Hall, near Wellingborough. “Sharp, William, M.D., F.R.S., F.G.S. Horton House, Rugby. Sharp, Rey. William, B.A. Mareham Rectory, near Boston, Lincoln- shire. Smarpry, Witriam, M.D., LL.D., F.R.S. L. & E. 50 Torrington- square, London, W.C. 1858. *Shaw, Bentley. Woodfield House, Huddersfield. 1854. *Shaw, Charles Wright. 3 Windsor-terrace, Douglas, Isle of Man, 1870. {Shaw, Duncan. Cordova, Spain, 1865. {Shaw, George. Cannon-street, Birmingham, 1870. {Shaw, John. 24 Great George-place, Liverpool. 1845. {Shaw, John, M.D., F.L.S., F.G.8. Hop House, Boston, Lincoln- shire. 1853. {Shaw, Norton, M.D. St. Croix, West Indies. 1839. Shepard, John. 41 Drewton-street, Manningham-road, Bradford, Yorkshire. 1863. {Shepherd, A. B. 49 Seymour-street, Portman-square, London, W. 1870. §Shepherd, Joseph. 29 Everton-crescent, Liverpool. Sheppard, Rey. Henry W., B.A. The Parsonage, Emsworth, Hants. 1878. §Shelford, W., C.E. Great George-street, Westminster, 8. W. 1866. {Shilton, Samuel Richard Parr. Sneinton House, Nottingham. 1867. {Shinn, William C. Her Majesty’s Printing Office, near Fetter-lane, London, E.C. : 1870. *SHoorsrep, James N., O.E., F.G.S. 3 Westminster-chambers, London, 8. W. 1875.§§Shore, Thomas W., F.C.8. Hartley Institution, Southampton. 1861, *Sidebotham, Joseph. The Beeches, Bowdon, Cheshire. 1877. *Sidebotham, Joseph Watson. The Beeches, Bowdon, Cheshire. 70 LIST OF MEMBERS. . Year of Election. 1873. {Sidgwick, R. H. The Raikes, Skipton. 1857. {Sidney, aoe John, LL.D., M.R.LA. 19 Herbert-street, Dublin. Sidney, M. J. F. Cowpen, Newcastle-upon-Tyne. 1873. *Siemens, Alexander. 12 Queen Anne’s-cate, Westminster, S.W. 1856. *Sremens, C. Witttam, D.O.L., F.R.S., F.C.S., M.IL.C.E. 12 Queen Anne’s-gate, Westminster, 8. W. 1878. §Sigerson, Professor George, M.D., F.L.S., M.R.LA. 8 Clare-street, Dublin. 1859. {Sim, John. Hardgate, Aberdeen. 1871. {Sime, James. Craigmount House, Grange, Edinburgh. 1865. {Simkiss, T. M. Wolverhampton. 1862. {Simms, James. 138 Fleet-street, London, E.C. 1874. §Simms, William. The Linen Hall, Belfast. 1876.§§Simon, Frederick. 24 Sutherland-gardens, London, W. 1847. {Simon, John, C.B., D.C.L., F.R.S., F.R.C.S., Medical Officer of the Privy Council. 40 Kensington-square, London, W. 1866. {Simons, George. The Park, Nottingham. 1871. *Smupson, ALEXANDER R., M.D., Professor of Midwifery in the Uni- versity of Edinburgh. 52 Queen-street, Edinburgh. 1867. {Simpson, G. B. Seafield, Broughty Ferry, by Dundee. 1859. {Simpson, John, Maykirk, Kincardineshire. 1863. [Simpson, J. B., F.G.S. Hedgefield House, Blaydon-on-Tyne. 1857. {Srupson, Maxwet1, M.D., F.R.S., F.C.8., Professor of Chemistry in Queen’s College, Cork. 1876.§§Simpson, Robert. 14 Ibrox-terrace, Glasgow. *Simpson, Rey. Samuel. Kingston House, Chester. Simpson, William. Bradmore House, Hammersmith, London, W. 1859. {Sinclair, Alexander. 153 George-street, Edinburgh. 1876. {Sinclair, James. Titwood Bank, Pollockshields, near Glasgow. 1874. {Sinclair, Thomas. Dunedin, Belfast. 1854. {Sinclair, Vetch, M.D. 48 Albany-street, Edinburgh. 1870. *Sinclair, W. P. 19 Devonshire-road, Prince’s Park, Liverpool. 1864. *Sircar, Mahendra Lal, M.D. 51 Sankaritola, Calcutta. (Care of Messrs. 8S. Harraden & Co., 3 Hill’s-place, Oxford-street, Lon- don, W.) 1865. {Sissons, William. 92 Park-street, Hull. 1870. §Sladen, Walter Percy, F.G.S., F.L.S. Exley House, near Halifax. 1878. {Slater, Clayton. Barnoldswick, near Leeds. 1870. {Slater, W. B. 42 Clifton’ Park-avenue, Belfast. 1842, *Slater, William. Park-lane, Higher Broughton, Manchester. 1855. {Sleddon, Francis. 2 Kingston-terrace, Hull. 1877. §Sleeman, Rey. Philip. Clifton, Bristol. 1849. {Sloper, George Edgar. Devizes. 1849. {Sloper, Samuel W. Devizes. 1860. $Sloper, S. Elgar. Winterton, near Hythe, Southampton. 1872. {Smale, The Hon. Sir John, Chief Justice of Hong Kong. 1867. {Small, David. Gray House, Dundee, 1858. {Smeeton, G. H. Commercial-street, Leeds. 1876. {Smeiton, James. Panmure Villa, Broughty Ferry, Dundee. 1876. {Smeiton, John G. Panmure Villa, Broughty Ferry, Dundee. 1867. {Smeiton, Thomas A. 55 Cowgate, Dundee. 1876. §Smellie, Thomas D. 213 St. Vincent-street, Glasgow. 1877.§§Smelt, Rev. Maurice Allen, M.A., F.R.A.S. Heath Lodge, Chel- tenham. 1857. {Smith, Aquilla, M.D., M.R.L.A. 121 Lower Baggot-street, Dublin. LIST OF MEMBERS. 71 Year of Election. 1868. 1872. 1874. 1873. 1865. 1865. 1866. 1855. 1876. 1855. 1860. 1876. 1870. 1871. 1876. 1874. 1867. 1871. 1870. 1860. 1837. 1847. 1870. 1866. 1873. 1867. 1867. 1859. 1852. 1875. 1876. 1878. 1874. 1850. 1874. 1870. 1857. 1868. tSmith, Augustus. Northwood House, Church-road, Upper Norwood, Surrey, 8.E. *Smith, Basil Woodd, F.R.A.S. Branch Hill Lodge, Hampstead- Heath, London, N. W. *Smith, Benjamin Leigh. 64 Gower-street, London, W.C. {Smith, ©. Sidney College, Cambridge. {Surru, Davin, F-R.A.S. 40 Bennett’s-hill, Birmingham. fSmith, Frederick. The Priory, Dudley. *Smith, F.C.,M.P. Bank, Nottingham. tSmith, George. Port Dundas, Glasgow. Smith, George. Glasgow. tSmith, George Cruickshank. 19 St. Vincent-place, Glasgow. *Suira, Henry Jonn Srepuen, M.A., F.R.S., F.C.S., Savilian Pro- fessor of Geometry in the University of Oxford, and Keeper of the University Museum. The Museum, Oxford. *Smith, Heywood, M.A.,M.D. 2 Portugal-street, Grosvenor-square, s: London, W. TSmith, J. Glasgow. Smith, James. 146 Bedford-street South, Liverpool. *Smith, John Alexander, M.D., F.R.S.E. 10 Palmerston-place, Edin- burgh. *Smith, J Y Giatite, 173 St. Vincent-street, Glasgow. {Smith, John Haigh. Beech Hill, Halifax, Yorkshire. *Smith, John P., C.E. Haughhead Cottage, Glasgow. Smith, John Peter George. Sweyney Cliff, near Coalport, Shrop- shire. {Smith, Professor J. William Robertson. Free Church College, Aberdeen. {Smith, H. L. Crabwall Hall, Cheshire. “Smith, Philip, B.A. 26 South Hill Park, Hampstead, London, N.W. *Smith, Protherce, M.D. 42 Park-street, Grosvenor-square, Lon- don, W. Smith, Richard Bryan. Villa Nova, Shrewsbury. . §SMrrH, Rosert Anevs, Ph.D., F.R.S., F.C.S. 22 Devonshire-street, Manchester. *Smith, Robert Mackay. 4 Bellevue-crescent, Edinburgh. {Smith, Samuel. Bank of Liverpool, Liverpool. {Smith, Samuel. 33 Compton-street, Goswell-road, London, H.C. {Smith, Swire. Lowfield, Keighley, Yorkshire. tSmith, Thomas. Dundee. {tSmith, Thomas. Poole Park Works, Dundee. {Smith, Thomas James, F.G.8., F.C.S. Hessle, near Hull. {Smith, William. Eglinton Engine Werks, Glasgow. *Smith, William. Sundon House, Clifton, Bristol. §Smith, William. 12 Woodside-place, Glasgow. §Smithson, Joseph S. Balnagowan, Rathmines, Co. Dublin. {Smoothy, Frederick. Bocking, Essex. *Suyrn, Caries Prazzi, F.R.S.E., F.R.A.S., Astronomer Royal for Scotland, Professor of Astronomy in the University of Edin- burgh. 15 Royal-terrace, Edinburgh. {Smyth, Henry, C.E. Downpatrick, Treland. {Smyth, Colonel H. A., R.A. .Barrackpore, near Calcutta. *SmytH, JOHN, jun., "M. A., C.E., F.M.S. Lenaderg, Banbridge, Treland. {Smyth, Rev. J. D. Hurst. 13 Upper St. Giles’s-street, Norwich. 72 LIST OF MEMBERS. Year of Election. 1864. {Suyra, Warrmeton W., M.A., F.R.S., F.G.S., F.R.G.S., Lecturer on Mining and Mineralogy at the Royal School of Mines, and Inspector of the Mineral Property of the Crown. 5 Inverness- terrace, Bayswater, London, W. 1878. §Smyth, Mrs. Wigmore Lodge, Cullenswood-ayenue, Dublin. 1854, {Smythe, Lieut.-General W. J., R.A.. F.R.S. Athenzeum Club, Pall Mall, London, S.W. 1878. §Snell, H. Saxon. 3 Greville-place, Maida Hill, London, N. W. Soden, John. Athenzeum Club, Pall Mall, London, 8.W. *Sotty, Epwarp, F.R.S., F.LS., F.G.S., F.S.A. Park House, Sutton, Surrey. : *SopwirH, THomas, M.A., F.RS., F.G.8., F.R.G.S. 103 Victoria- street, Westminster, S. W. Sorbey, Alfred. The Rookery, Ashford, Bakewell. 1859. *Sorsy, H. Crirron, F.R.S., F.G.8. Broomfield, Sheffield. 1865. *Southall, John Tertius. Leominster. 1859. {Southall, Nornian. 44 Cannon-street West, London, E.C. , 1856. {Southwood, Rey. T. A. Cheltenham College. 1863. {Sowerby, John. Shipcote House, Gateshead, Durham. 1863. *Spark, H. King. Starforth House, Barnard Castle. 1859, {Spence, Rev. James, D.D. 6 Clapton-square, London, N.E. *Spence, Joseph. 60 Holgate Hill, York. 1869. *Spence, J. Berger. Erlington House, Manchester. 1854. §Spence, Peter. Pendleton Alum Works, Newton Heath ; and Smed- ley Hall, near Manchester. 1861. {Spencer, John Frederick. 28 Great George-street, London, 8. W. 1861. *Spencer, Joseph. Springbank, Old Trafford, Manchester. 1863. *Spencer, Thomas. The Grove, Ryton, Blaydon-on-Tyne, Co. Durham. 1875. {Spencer, W.H. Richmond Hill, Clifton, Bristol. 1871. {Spicer, George. Broomfield, Halifax. 1864. *Spicer, Henry, B.A., F.L.S., F.G.S. 14 Aberdeen Patk, Highbury, London, N. 1864.§§Spicer, William R. 19 New Bridge-street, Blackfriars, London, E.C. 1864, ees a Joun, F.C.S. 2 St. Mary’s-road, Canonbury, London, 1878. §Spottiswoode, George Andrew. 29 Ashley-place, London, S.W. 1846. *Sporriswoopz, Wiit1aM, M.A., D.C.L., LL.D., Pres. R.S., F.R.A.S., F.R.G.S. (Presrpenr.) 41 Grosvenor-place, London, 8. W. 1864, *Spottiswoode, W. Hugh. 41 Grosvenor-place, London, 8. W. 1854. *Spracur, THomas Bonp. 29 Buckingham-terrace, Edinburgh. 1853. {Spratt, Joseph James. West Parade, Hull. Square, Joseph Elliot, F.G.S. 24 Portland-place, Plymouth. 1877.§§SquarE, WitiaM, F.R.C.S., F.R.G.S. 4 Portland-square, Ply- mouth. *Squire, Lovell. The Observatory, Falmouth. 1858, *Srarinton, Henry T., F.R.S., F.L.S., F.G.S. Mountsfield, Lewis- ham, S.E. 1865. §StanrorD, Epwarp C.0. Thornloe, Partick Hill, near Glasgow. | 1837. Staniforth, Rev. Thomas. Storrs, Windermere. Srantey, The Very Rey. AnrHuR Prnruyn, D.D., F.R.S., Dean of Westminster. The Deanery, Westminster, Loudon, S.W. Stapleton, M. H., M.B., M.R.I.A. 1 Mountjoy-place, Dublin. 1866. {Starey, Thomas R, Daybrook House, Nottingham. 1876. §Starling, John Henry, F.C.S. The Avenue, Erith, Kent. Stayeley, T. K. Ripon, Yorkshire. 1873. *Stead, Charles, Saltaire, Bradford, Yorkshire. — LIST OF MEMBERS. 73 Year of Election. 1857. 1870. 1863. 1873. 1861 1872 1861 . {Steale, William Edward, MD. 15, Hatch-street, Dublin. {Stearn, C. H. 2 St. Paul’s-villas, Rock Ferry, Liverpool. {Steele, Rev. Dr. 35 Sydney-buildings, Bath. §Steinthal,G. A. 15 Hallfield-road, Bradford, Yorkshire. {Steinthal, H. M. Hollywood, Fallowfield, near Manchester. SrenHousr, Jouy, LL.D., F.R.S., F.C.S. 17 Rodney-street, Pen- tonville, London, N. {Stennett, Mrs, Eliza. 2 Clarendon-terrace, Brighton, *Stern,S. J. Littlegrove, East Barnet, Herts. 1863.§§Sterriker, John. Driftield, Yorkshire. 1872. 1876. 1870. 1861. 1863. 1868. 1878. 1863. 1876. 1855. 1864. 1856, 1875. 1847, 1876. 1867. 1868. 1876, 1867. 1865. 1864, 1854, 1862. 1874, 1876. 1859. 1857. 1878. 1861, 1876. 1854. 1873. 1867. 1859. {Sterry, William, Union Club, Pall Mall, London, S.W. {Steuart, Walter. City Bank, Pollockshaws, near Glasgow. *Stevens, Miss Anna Maria. . Belmont, Devizes-road, Salisbury. “Stevens, Henry, F.S.A., F.R.G.S. 4 Trafalgar-square, London, W.C *Stevenson, Archibald. 2 Wellington-crescent, South Shields. {Stevenson, Henry, F.LS. Newmarket-road, Norwich. §Stevenson, Rev. James, M.A. 21 Garville-avenue, Rathgar, Dublin. “Stevenson, Jamis C., M.P., F.C.S. Westoe, South Shields. “Stewart, Alexander B. Raweliffe Lodge, Langside, Glaszow. {Srewart, Batrour, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S., Professor of Natural Philosophy in Owens College, Manchester. {Srewart, Cuarzes, M.A., F.L.S. St. Thomas's Hospital, London, S.E “Stewart, Henry Hutchinson, M.D., M.R.I.A. 75 Eccles-street, Dublin. “Stewart, James, B.A. Mount Hope, Sneyd Park, near Bristol. {Stewart, Robert, M.D. The Asylum, Belfast. {Stewart, William. Violet Grove House, St. George’s-road, Glasgow. {Stirling, Dr. D. Perth. {Stirling, Edward. 34 Queen’s-gardens, Hyde Park, London, W. Stirling, William, M.D., D.Sc. The University, Edinburgh. “Stirrup, Mark, F.G.S. 14 Atkinson-street, Deansgate, Manchester. *Stock, Joseph 8S. 1 Chartham-terrace, Ramsgate. §Sroppart, Wirtiam Watrer, F.G.S., F.C.S. Grafton Lodge, Sneyd Park, Bristol. {Stoess, Le Chevalier Ch. de W. (Bavarian Consul). Liverpool. *Srokes, GroRGE GABRIEL, M.A., D.C.L., LL.D., Sec. R.S., Lucasian Professor of Mathematics in the University of Cambridge. Lens- field Cottage, Cambridge. {Sronz, Epwarp James, M.A., F.R.S., F.R.A.S., Director of the Radcliffe Observatory, Oxtord. §Stone, J. Harris, B.A., F.L.S., F.C.S. 16 Wilmot-terrace, Belfast. {Stone, Octavius C., F.R.G.S. Springfield, Nuneaton. {Stone, Dr. William H. 14 Dean’s-yard, Westminster, S. W. {Sronzy, Brypon B., O.E., M.R.LA., Engineer of the Port of Dublin. 42 Wellington-road, Dublin. *Stoney, G. Gerald. 8 Palmerston Park, Dublin. *Srongy, GzoreE Jonnsrong, M.A., F.R.S., M.R.I.A., Secretary to the Queen’s University, Ireland. 3 Palmerston Park, Dublin. §Stopes, Henry, F.G.S. East Hill, Colchester. Store, George. Prospect House, F airfield, Liverpool. {Storr, William. The ‘Times’ Office, Printing-house-square, Lon- don, E.C. Srorr4R, Joun, M.D. Heathview, Hampstead, London, N.W. §Story, James. 17 Bryanston-square, London, W. v4 LIST OF MEMBERS. Year of Election. 1874, 1871. 1876. 1863. 1859. 1867. 1876. 1878. 1876. 1872. 1864, 1873. 1857. 1873. 1878. 1863. 1862. 1863. 1876, 1861. 1862. 1862. 1870. 1863. 1878. 1873. 1847. 1862. 1847. 1870. 1856. 1859. 1860, 1859. §Stott, William. Greetland, near Halifax, Yorkshire. *SrracHey, Lieut.-Genéral Ricwarp, R.E., C.S.L, F.R.S., F.R.GS., F.L.S., F.G.S. Stowey House, Clapham Common, London, S.W. {Strain, John. 143 West Regent-street, Glasgow. tStraker, John. Wellington House, Durham. *Strickland, Charles. Loughglyn House, Castlerea, Ireland. Strickland, William. French Park, Roscommon, Ireland. {Stronach, William, R.E. Ardmellie, Banff. {Stronner, D. 14 Princess-street, Dundee. *Struthers, John, M.D., Professor of Anatomy in the University of Aberdeen. §Strype, W. G., C.E. Wicklow. *Stuart, Charles Maddock. Sudbury Hill, Harrow. *Stuart, Rey. Edward A. 22 Bedford-street, Norwich. {Style, Sir Charles, Bart. 102 New Sydney-place, Bath. §Style, George, M.A. Giggleswick School, Yorkshire. t{Sunntivan, Witrram K., Ph.D., M.R.I.A. Queen’s College, Cork. {Sutcliffe, J. W. Sprink Bank, Bradford, Yorkshire. tSutcliffe, Robert. Iadle, near Leeds. {Sutherland, Benjamin John. 10 Oxford-street, Newcastle-on-Tyne. *SuTHERLAND, GEORGE GRANVILLE WILLIAM, Duke of, K.G., F.R.S., F.R.G.S. Stafford House, London, 8. W. tSurron, Francis, F.C.S. Bank Plain, Norwich. {Swan, David, jun. Braeside, Maryhill, Glasgow. *Swan, Patrick Don 8. Kirkcaldy, N.B. *Swan, WitrrAm, LL.D., F.R.S.E., Professor of Natural Philosophy in the University of St. Andrews. Ardchapel, by Helensburgh, N.B. *Swann, Rey. S. Kirke, F.R.A.S. Forest Hill Lodge, Warsop, Mansfield, Nottinghamshire. Sweetman, Walter, M.A., M.R.LA. 4 Mountjoy-square North, Dublin. *Swinburne, Sir John, Bart. Capheaton, Newcastle-on-Tyne. t{Swindell, J. S. E. Summerhill, Kingswinford, Dudley. *Swinglehurst, Henry. Hincaster House, near Milnthorpe. §Sykes, Benjamin Clifford, M.D. Cleckheaton. {Sykes, H. P. 47 Albion-street, Hyde Park, London, W. {Sykes, Thomas. Cleckheaton, near Leeds. {Sykes, Captain W. H. F. 47 Albion-street, Hyde Park, London, W. SyivestER, James JosepH, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S. Athenzeum Club, London, 8. W. §Symes, Ricuarp Guascorr, A.B., F.G.S. Geological Survey of Ireland, 14 Hume-street, Dublin. *Symonds, Frederick, M.A., F.R.C.S. 35 Beaumont-street, Oxford. t{Symonds, Captain Thomas Edward, R.N. 10 Adam-street, Adelphi, London, W.C. {Symonns, Rev. W.S., M.A., F.G.S. Pendock Rectory, Worcester- shire. §Symons, G. J., F.R.S., Sec. M.S. 62 Camden-square, London, N.W : *Symons, WILLIAM, F.C.S. 26 Joy-street, Barnstaple. Synge, Francis. Glanmore, Ashford, Co. Wicklow. {Synge, Major-General Millington, R.E., F.S.A., F.R.G.S. United Service Club, Pall Mall, London, 8. W. . {Tailyour, Colonel Renny, R.E. Newmanswalls, Montrose, N.B. LIST OF MEMBERS. 75 Year of Election. 1877. 1871. 1867. 1874, 1866. 1878. 1861. 1856. 1857. 1863. 1870. 1858. *Tart, Lawson, F.R.C.S. 7 Great Charles-street, Birmingham. {Tarz, PETER Gururtie, F.R.S.E., Professor of Natural Philosophy in the University of Edinburgh. George-square, Edinburgh. {Tait, P. M., F.R.G.S. Oriental Club, Hanover-square, London, W. §Talbot, William Hawkshead. Hartwood Hall, Chorley, Lancashire. §Talmage, C. G. Leyton Observatory, Essex, E. {Tarbottom, Marrott “Ogle, M.1L.C.E., F.G.S8. Newstead-grove, Not- tingham. §Tarpey, Hugh. Dublin. *Tarratt, Henry W. Mountfield, Grove Hill, Tunbridge Wells. {Tartt, William Macdonald, FS. 8. Sandford-place, Cheltenham. *Tate, Alexander. 2 Queen ’s-elms, Belfast. tTate, John. Alnmouth, near Alnwick, Northumberland. ¢Tate, Norman A. 7 Nivell-chambers, Fazackerley-street, Liver- ool. *Tatham, George. Springfield Mount, Leeds. 1876.§§Tatlock, Robert R. 26 Burnbank-gardens, Glasgow. 1864, 1871. 1878. 1874. 1867. 1874. 1861. 1873. 1865. 1876. 1878. *TAWNEY, Epwarp B., F.G.S. Woodwardian Museum, Cambridge. {Tayler, William, F, S.A, F.S.8. 28 Park-street, Grosvenor-square, London, W. *Taylor, A. Claude. Clinton House, The Park, Nottingham. {Taylor, Alexander O'Driscoll. 3 Upper-crescent, Belfast. tTaylor, Rey. Andrew. Dundee. Taylor, Frederick, Laurel Cottage, Rainhill, near Prescot, Lan- cashire. tTaylor, G. P. Students’ Chambers, Belfast. *TayLor, JoHN, F.G.S. 6 Queen-street-place, Upper Thames-street, London, EC. *Taylor, John, jun. 6 Queen-street-place, Upper Thames-street, London, E.C. tTaytor, Joun Ettor, F.L.S., F.G.S. The Mount, Ipswich. tTaylor, Joseph. 99 Constitution-hill, Birmingham. *Taytor, Ricwarp, F.G.S. 6 Queen-street-place, Upper Thames- street, London, EC. tTaylor, Robert. 70 Bath-street, Glasgow. §Taylor, Robert, J.P., LL.D. Corballis, Diralicden 1870.§§Taylor, Thomas. Aston Rowant, Tetsworth, Oxon. 1858. 1869. 1876. 1863. 1857. 1866. 1871. 1871. 1835. 1870. 1871. 1875. 1875. 1869. *Taylor, William Edward. Millfield House, Hnfield, near Accring- ton. {Teale, Thomas Pridgin, jun. 20 Park-row, Leeds. tTeesdale, C.S. M. Whyke House, Chichester, tTemperley, Ernest. Queen’s College, Cambridge. tTennant, Henry. Saltwell, Newcastle-on-Tyne. *Trnnant, James, F.G.S., F.R.G.S., Profesor of Mineralogy in King’s College. 149 Strand, London, W.C. {Tennison, Edward King. Kildare-street Club House, Dublin. tThackeray, J. L. Amo Vale, Nottingham. {Thin, James. 7 Rillbank-terrace, Edinburgh. {tTuiseLton-DygEr, W. T., M.A., B.Sc., F. Las swikd Gloucester-road, Kew, W. Thom, J ohn. Lark-hill, Chorley, Lancashire. tThom, Robert Wilson. "Lark-hill, Chorley, Lancashire. {Thomas, Ascanius William Nevill. Chudleigh, Devon. *THOMAS, CHRISTOPHER JAMES. Drayton Lodge, Redland, Bristol. Thomas, George. Brislington, Bristol. §Thomas, Herbert. 2 Great George-street, Bristol. t{Thomas, H. D. Fore-street, Exeter. 76 LIST OF MEMBERS. Year of Elect.on. 1869. ¢Thomas, J. Henwood, F.R.G.S. Custom House, London, E.C. 1875.§§Thompson, Arthur. 12 St. Nicholas-street, Hereford. 18653. 1858, {Thompson, Rev. Francis. St. Giles’s, Durham. *Thompson, Frederick. South-parade, Wakefield. 1859.§§Thompson, George, jun. Pidsmedden, Aberdeen. : 1870. 1861. 1864, 1873. 1876. 1874. 1876. 1878. 1865. 1867. 1855. 1850. 1852. 1850. 1855. 1868. Thompson, Harry Stephen. Kirby Hall, Great Ouseburn, York- shire. {THompson, Sir Henry. 385 Wimpole-street, London, W. Thompson, Henry Stafford. Fairfield, near York. *Thompson, Joseph. Woodlands, Fulshaw, near Manchester. {Tuompson, Rev. JosrpH Hesseterave, B.A. Cradley, near Brierley Hill. Thompson, Leonard. Sheriff-Hutton Park, Yorkshire. ¢{Thompson, M. W. Guiseley, Yorkshire. *Thompson, Richard. Park-street, The Mount, York. §Thompson, Robert. Walton, Fortwilliam Park, Belfast. §THompson, Sttvanus- Pups, B.A., D.Sc., F.R.A.S., Professor of Physics in University College, Bristol. 8 Carlton-place, Clifton, Bristol. §Thompson, T. D. Clare Hall, Raheny, Co. Dublin. t{Thompson, William. 11 North-terrace, Newcastle-on-Tyne. {Thoms, William. Magdalen-yard-read, Dundee. {Tnomson, AttEN, M.D., LL.D., F.R.S. L. & E. 66 Palace Gardens- terrace, Kensington, London, W. {THomson, Sir Cuartes Wrvit1e. LL.D., F.RS. L. & E., F.G.S., Regius Professor of Natural History in the University of Edinburgh. 20 Palmerston-place, Edinburgh. tThomson, Gordon A. Bedeque House, Belfast. Thomson, Guy. Oxford. *THomson, Professor James, M.A., LL.D., C.E., F.R.S. L. & E. Oakfield House, University Avenue, Glasgow. { Thompson, James. 82 West Nile-street, Glasgow. §THomson, Jamus, F.G.8. 3 Abbotsford-place, Glasgow. *Thomson, James Gibson. 14 York-place, Edinburgh. 1876.§§Thomson, James'R. Dalmuir House, Dalmuir, Glasgow. 1874. 1871. 1871. 1865. 1847, 1877. 1874. 1876. {Thompson, John. Harbour Office, Belfast. *Thomson, John Millar, F.C.S. King’s College, London, W.C. {Thomson, Robert, LL.B. 12 Rutland-square, Edinburgh. {Thomson, R. W., O.E., F.R.S.E. 3 Moray-place, Edinburgh. *THomson, Sir WitttaM, M.A., LL.D., D.C.L., F.RS. L. & E., Professor of Natural Philosophy in the University of Glasgow, The University, Glasgow, *Thomson, Lady. The University, Glasgow. §Thomson, William, F.R.S.E., F.C.S. Royal Institution, Manchester. {¢Thomson, William. 6 Mansfield-place, Edinburgh. 1871.§§Thomson, William Burnes, F.R.S.E. 1 Ramsay-gardens, Edinburgh. 1871. 1852. 1866. 1867. 1845, 1871. 1864. t¢Thornburn, Rey. David, M.A. 1 John’s-place, Leith. t{Thornburn, Rev. William Reid, M.A. Starkies, Bury, Lancashire. {Thornton, James. Edwalton, Nottingham. *Thornton, Samuel, J.P. Oakfield, Moseley, near Birmingham. {Thornton, Thomas. Dundee. §Thorp, Dr. Disney. Suffolk Laun, Cheltenham. §Thorp, Henry. LBriarleigh, Sale, near Manchester. *THorp, Wixtr1aM, B.Sc., F.C.S. 39 Sandringham-road, Kingsland, London, E. 1871.§§THorpr, T. E., Ph.D., F.R.S. L. & E., F.C.8., Professor of Che- mistry in Yorkshire College, Leeds. LIST OF MEMBERS, 77 Year of Election. 1868. {Thuillier, Colonel, R.A., C.S.1, F.R.S., Surveyor-General of India. 46 Park-street, Calcutta. 1870. {Tichborne, Charles R. C., F.C.S., M.R.I.A. Apothecaries’ Hall of Ireland, Dublin. 1873. *TmppEman, R. H., M.A.. F.G.S. 28 Jermyn-street, London, 8. W. 1874. {Tilden, William A., D.Sc., F.C.S. Clifton College, Bristol. 1873. {Tilzhman, B. C. Philadelphia, United States. 1865.§§Timmins, Samuel, J.P., F.S.A. Elvetham-road, Edgbaston, Bir- mingham. Tinker, Ebenezer. Mealhill, near Huddersfield. *TinneE, JoHn A., F.R.G.S. Briarley, Aigburth, Liverpool. 1876.§§Todd, Rev. Dr. Tudor Hall, Forest Hill, London, 8.E. 1861. *fopHunrer, Isaac, M.A., F.R.S., Principal Mathematical Lecturer at St. John’s College, Cambridge. Brookside, Gaabanee: 1857. tTombe, Rev. Canon. Glenealy, Co. Wicklow. 1856. {Tomes, Robert Fisher. Welford, Stratford-on-A von. 1864. *Tomirnson, CHarxes, F.R.S., FCS. 3 Ridgmount-terrace, High- gate, London, N. 1863. {Tone, John F. Jesmond-villas, Newcastle-on-Tyne. 1865, §Tonks, Edmund, B.C.L. Packwood Grange, Knowle, Warwick- shire. 1865.§§Tonks, William Henry. The Rookery, Sutton Coldfield. 1873. *Tookey, Charles, F.C.S. Royal Schoo! of Mines, Jermyn-street, London, 8. W. 1861. *Topham, John, A.I.C.E. High Elms, 265 Mare-street, Hackney, London, E. 1872. *Torrny, Witiiam, F.G.S., A.I.C.E. Geological Survey Office, Jermyn-street, London, 8. W. 1875. §Torr, Charles Hawley. Harrowby House, Park-row, Nottingham. 1863. {Torrens, Colonel Sir R. R., K.C.M.G. 2 Gloucester-place, Hyde Park, London, W. 1859. aa Very Rey. John, Dean of St. Andrews. Coupar Angus, B. Towgood, Edward. St. Neot’s, Huntingdonshire. 1873. tTownend, W.H. Heaton Hall, Bradford, Yorkshire. 1875. {Townsend, Charles. Avenue House, Cotham Park, Bristol. 1857. *TownsEnp, Rev. Ricuarp, M.A., F.R.S., Professor of Natural Philo- sophy in the University of Dublin. Trinity College, Dublin. 1861. {Townsend, William. Attleborough Hall, near Nuneaton. 1854. {Towson, Joun THomas, F.R.G.S. 47 Upper Parliament-street, Liverpool ; and Local Marine Board, Liverpool. 1877. §Tozer, Henry. Ashburton. 1876. *Trail, J. W. H., M.A., M.B., F.L.S. King’s Colleze, Old Aberdeen. 1870. {TRaitt, Witt1AM A., M.R.I.A. Geological Survey of Ireland, 14 Hume-street, Dublin. 1875.§§Trapnell, Caleb. 'Severnleigh, Stoke Bishop. 1868. {TRagvarr, Ramsay H., M.D., Professor of Zoology. Museum of Science and Art, Edinbur oh. 1835, Travers, Robert, MB. Williamstown, Blackrock, Co. Dublin. 1865. {Travers, William, F.R.C.S. 1 Bath-place, Kensington, London, Ww. Tregelles, Nathaniel. Liskeard, Cornwall. 1868. tTrehane, John. Exe View Lawn, Exeter. 1869. {Trehane, John, jun. Bedford-circus, Exeter. 1870. {Trench, Dr. Municipal Offices, Dale-street, Liverpool. Trench, F. A. Newlands House, Clondalkin, Ireland. *TREVELYAN, ArruuR, J.P. Tyneholm, Pencaitland, N.B. 78 LIST OF MEMBERS. Year of Election. TREVELYAN, Sir WALTER CALVERLEY, Bart., M.A., F.R.S.E., F.G.S., F.S.A., F.R.G.S. Athenzeum Club, London, 8.W.; Wallington, Northumberland ; and Nettlecombe, Somerset. 1871. {TRrpE, ALFRED, F.C.S. 14 Denbigh-road, Bayswater, London, W. 1871. {TRmen, Rowranp, F.L.S., F.Z.S. Colonial Secretary’s Office, Cape Town, Cape of Good Hope. 1877.§§TRimEN, Henry, M.B., F.L.S. British Museum, London, W.C. 1860. §TRistRaM, Rev. Henry Baker, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S., F.L.S., Canon of Durham. The College, Durham. 1869. {Troyte,C. A. W. Huntsham Court, Bampton, Devon. 1864. {Truell, Robert. Ballyhenry, Ashford, Co. Wicklow. 1869. {Tucker, Charles. Marlands, Exeter. 1847, *Tuckett, Francis Fox. 10 Baldwin-street, Bristol. Tuke, James H. Bank, Hitchen. 1871. {Tuke, J. Batty, M.D. Cupar, Fifeshire. 1867. {Tulloch, The Very Rey. Principal, D.D. St. Andrew’s, Fife- shire. 1854, {TurnBULL, James, M.D. 86 Rodney-street, Liverpool. 1855, §Turnbull, John. 87 West George-street, Glasgow. 1856. {Turnbull, Rev. J.C. 8 Bays-hill-villas, Cheltenham. 1871.§§Turnbull, William, F.R.S.E. 14 Lansdowne-crescent, Edinburgh. 1873. *Turner, George. Horton Grange, Bradford, Yorkshire. Turner, Thomas, M.D. 31 Curzon-street, Mayfair, London, W. 1875. {Turner, Thomas, F.S.8._ Ashley House, Kingsdown, Bristol. 1863, *Turner, WittraM, M.B., F.R.S. L. & E., Professor of Anatomy in the University of Edinburgh. 16 Eton-terrace, Edinburgh. 1842. Twamley, Charles, F.G.S._Ryton-on-Dunsmore, Coventry. 1847, {Twiss, Sir Travers, Q.C., D.C.L., F.R.S., F.R.G.S. 3 Paper- buildings, Temple, London, E.C. 1865.§§Tytor, Epwarp Buryerr, F.R.S. Linden, Wellington, Somer- t. set. 1858. *Tynpat1, Jonn, D.O.L., LL.D., Ph.D., F.R.S., F.G.S., Professor of Natural Philosophy in the Royal Institution, Royal Institu- tion, Albemarle-street, London, W, 1861. *Tysoe, John, 28 Seedley-road, Pendleton, near Manchester. 1876, *Unwin, W. C., A.IC.E., Professor of Hydraulic Engineering. Cooper’s Hill, Middlesex. 1872. t{Upward, Alfred. 11 Great Queen-street, Westminster, London, S.W, 1876. {Ure, J ohn F. 6 Claremont-terrace, Glasgow. 1859. {Urquhart, W. Pollard. Craigston Castle, N.B.; and Castlepollard, Treland. 1866. {Urquhart, William W. Rosebay, Broughty Ferry, by Dundee. *Vance, Rev. Robert. 24 Blaekhall-street, Dublin. 1863. {Vandoni, le Commandeur Comte de, Chargé d’Affaires de S. M. Tunisienne, Geneva. 1854. {Varley, Cromwell F., F.R.S. Fleetwood House, Beckenham, Kent. 1868.§§ Varley, Frederick H., F.R.A.S. Mildmay Park Works, Mildmay- avenue, Stoke Newington, London, N. 1865. *Vartry, S. ALFRED. Hatfield, Herts, 1870. { Varley, Mrs. S. A. Hatfield, Herts, 1869. {Varwell, P. Alphington-street, Exeter. 1875.§§ Vaughan, Miss. Burlton Hall, Shrewsbury. 1849, es Frederick. Central Telegraph Office, Adelaide, South Aus- tralia, LIST OF MEMBERS, 79 Year of Election. 1873. *VERNEY, Captain Epmunp H., R.N., F.R.G.S. Rhianya, Bangor, North Wales. Verney, Sir Harry, Bart. Lower Claydon, Buckinghamshire. 1866. {Vernon, Rey. E. H. Harcourt. Cotgrave Rectory, near Nottingham. Vernon, George John, Lord. 32 Curzon-street, London, W.; and Sudbury Hall, Derbyshire. 1854. *VeRNon, GroreE V., F.R.A.S. 1 Osborne-place, Old Trafford, Manchester. 1864, *Vicary, Witu1aM, F.G.S. The Priory, Colleton-crescent, Exeter. 1868. {Vincent, Rev. William. Postwick Rectory, near Norwich. 1875. {Vines, David, F.R.A.S. Observatory House, Somerset-street, Kings- down, Bristol. 1856. {Vivran, Epwarp, M.A. Woodfield, Torquay. *Vivian, H. Hussry, M.P., F.G.S. Park Werne, Swansea; and 27 Belgrave-square, London, 8. W. 1856.§§ Vortcxer, J. Cu. Aveusrus, Ph.D., F.R.S., F.C.S., Professor of Chemistry to the Royal Agricultural Society of England. 39 Argyll-road, Kensington, London, W. 1875. {Volckman, Mrs. E.G. 48 Victoria-road, Kensington, London, W. 1875. {Volckman, William. 43 Victoria-road, Kensington, London, W. tVose, Dr. James. Gambier-terrace, Liverpool. 1875. t Wace, Rev, A. St. Paul's, Maidstone, Kent. 1860.§§Waddingham, John. Guiting Grange, .Winchcombe, Gloucester- shire. 1859. { Waddington, John. New Dock Works, Leeds. 1870. §Waxe, Cuartes Stanttanp. 70 Wright-street, Hull. 1855. *Waldegrave, The Hon. Granville. 26 Portland-place, London, W. 1873. {Wales, James. 4 Mount Royd, Manningham, Bradford, Yorkshire. 1869. * Walford, Cornelius. 86 Belsize Park-gardens, London, N.W. 1849, §WaLker, Cuarizs V., F.R.S., F.R.A.S. Fernside, Reigate Hill, Reigate. Walker, Sir Edward S. Berry Hill, Mansfield. Walker, Frederick John. The Priory, Bathwick, Bath. 1866, { Walker, H. Westwood, Newport, by Dundee. 1855. tWalker, John. 1 Exchange-court, Glasgow. 1842. *Walker, John. Thorncliffe, Kemilworth-road, Leamington. 1866. *Watxer, J. F., M.A., F.C.P.S., F.0.8., F.G.S., F.L.8, 16 Gilly- gate, York. 1867. * Walker, Peter G. 2 Airlie-place, Dundee. 1866. { Walker, S. D. 38 Hampden-street, Nottingham. 1869. * Walker, Thomas F. W., M.A., F.G.S., F.R.G.S. 3 Circus, Bath, Walker, William. 47 Northumberland-street, Edinburgh. 1869. {| Walkey, J. E. C. High-street, Exeter. 1863. [WaLLAce, ALFRED Russet, F.R.G.S., F.L.S, Waldron Edge, Duppas Hill, Croydon. 1859. {Wattace, Witt1aM, Ph.D., F.C.S. Chemical Laboratory, 138 Bath- street, Glasgow. 1857. { Waller, Edward. Lisenderry, Aughnacloy, Ireland. 1862, {Waticu, GrorcrE CuHartzs, M.D., F.R.G.S., F.LS. Terrace House, St. George’s-terrace, Herne Bay. 1862. {Watpotz, The Right Hon. Spencer Horatio, M.A., D.C.L., M.P., F.R.S. Ealing, London, W- 1857. { Walsh, Albert Jasper, F.R.C.S.I. 89 Harcourt-street, Dublin. Walsh, John (Prussian Consul). Dundrum Castle, Co, Dublin, 1863. {Walters, Robert. Eldon-square, Newcastle-on-Tyne. Walton, Thomas Todd. Mortimer House Clifton, Bristol. 80 LIST OF MEMBERS. Year of Election. 1863. 1872, 1874. 1874. 1857. 1863. 1867. 1858. 1865. 1878. 1864, 1872. 1856. 1875. 1865. 1856. 1876. 1875. 1854. 1870. 1875. 1875. 1867. 1855, 1867. 1878. 1859. 1863. 1863. 1867. 1869. 1861. 1875. 1846. 1870. 1873. 1858. 1859. tWanklyn, James Alfred. 117 Charlotte-street, Fitzroy-square, London, W. { Warburton, Benjamin. Leicester. §Ward, F.D. Fernleigh, Botanic-road, Belfast. § Ward, John, F.R.G.S. Lenox Vale, Belfast. }Ward, John 8. Prospect-hill, Lisburn, Ireland. Ward, Rev. Richard, M.A. 12 Eaton-place, London, S.W. tWard, Robert. Dean-street, Newcastle-on-Tyne. *Ward, William Sykes, F.C.S. 12 Bank-street, and Denison Hall, Leeds. { Warden, Alexander J. Dundee. t Wardle, Thomas. Leek Brook, Leek, Staffordshire. tWaring, Edward John, M.D., F,L.S. 49 Clifton-gardens, Maida Vale, London, W. § Warington, Robert. Harpenden, St. Alban’s, Herts. *Warner, Edward. 49 Grosvenor-place, London, 8. W. *Warner, Thomas. 47 Sussex-square, Brighton. tWarner, Thomas H. Lee. Tiberton Court, Hereford. {Warren, Algernon. Naseby House, Pembroke-road, Clifton, . Bristol. *Warren, Edward P. 18 Old-square, Birmingham. Warwick, William Atkinson, Wyddrington House, Cheltenham. t Washbourne, Buchanan, M.D. Gloucester. tWaterhouse, A. Willenhall House, Barnet, Herts. *WaTERHOUSE, JOHN, F.R.S., F.G.8., F.R.A.S. Wellhead, Halifax, Yorkshire. *Waterhouse, Captain J. Surveyor-General’s Office, Calcutta. (Care of Messrs. Triibner & Co., Ludgate-hill, London, E.C. { Waterhouse, Nicholas. 6 Rake-lane, Liverpool. { Waters, A. T. H., M.D. 29 Hope-street, Liverpool. §Waters, Arthur W., F.G.S8., F.L.8. Woodbrook, Alderléy Edge, near Manchester. {Watherston, Alexander Law, M.A., F.R.A.S. Bowdon, Cheshire. t{ Watson, Rey. Archibald, D.D. The Manse, Dundee. { Watson, Ebenezer. 16 Abercromby-place, Glasgow. { Watson, Frederick Edwin. Thickthorne House, Cringleford, Norwich. *Wartson, Henry Hoven, F.C.8. 227 The Folds, Bolton-le-Moors. Watson, Hewerr Corrrett. Thames Ditton, Surrey. *Watson, Sir James. Milton-Lockhart, Carluke, N.B. tWartson, Joon Forpus, M.A., M.D., F.L.S. India Museum, Lon- don, 8S. W. {t Watson, Joseph. Bensham-grove, near Gateshead-on-Tyne. tWatson, R. 8. 101 Pilgrim-street, Newcastle-on-Tyne. { Watson, Thomas Donald. 41 Cross-street, Finsbury, London, E.C. { Watt, Robert B. E., C.E., F.R.G.S. Ashley-avenue, Belfast. { Watts, Sir James. Abney Hall, Cheadle, near Manchester. *Warts, Jonny, B.A., D.Sc. 57 Baker-street, Portman-square, London, W. § Watts, John King, F.R.G.S, Market-place, St. Ives, Hunts. § Watts, William. Oldham Corporation Waterworks, Piethorn, near Rochdale. *Warts, W. Marswatt, D.Sc. Giggleswick Grammar School, near Settle. tWaud, Major E. Manston Hall, near Leeds. Waud, Rey. 8. W., M.A., F.R.A.S., F.O.P.S. Rettenden, near Wickford, Essex. }Waugh, Edwin. Sager-street, Manchester. LIST OF MEMBERS, 81 Year of Election. 1859. *Wavenry, The Right Hon. Lord, F.R.S.° 7 Audley -square, London, W. *Way, J. THomas, F.C.S. 9 Russell-road, Kensington, London, S.W. 1869. { Way, Samuel James. Adelaide, South Australia. 1871. { Webb, Richard M. 72 Grand-parade, Brighton. *Wess, Rev. THomas WittraM, M.A., F.R.A.S. Hardwick Vicar- age, Hay, South Wales. 1866, *Wrsp, WILLIAM FReEpERIcK, F.G.S., F.R.G.S. . Newstead Abbey, near Nottingham. 1859. {Webster, John. 42 King-street, Aberdeen. 1834, {Webster, Richard, F.R.A.S. 6 Queen Victoria-street, London, E.C ; 1845. { Wedgewood, Hensleigh. 17 Cumberland -terrace, Regent's Park, London, N.W. 1854, { Weightman, William Henry. Farn Lea, Seaforth, Liverpool. 1865. {Welch, Christopher, M.A. University Club, Pall Mall East, London, S. W. 1867. §Wetpon, WatreER, F.R.S.E. Rede Hall, Burstow, Surrey. 1878. § Weldon, Mrs. Walter. Rede Hall, Burstow, Surrey. 1876. § Weldon, W. F. R. Abbey Lodge, Merton, Surrey. 1850. { Wemyss, Alexander Watson, M.D. St. Andrews, N.B. Wentworth, Frederick W. T. Vernon. Wentworth Castle, near Barnsley, Yorkshire. 1864. *Were, Anthony Berwick. Whitehaven, Cumberland. 1853. {West, Alfred. Holderness-road, Hull. 1870. {West, Captain E. W. Bombay. 1853. {West, Leonard. Summergangs Cottage, Hull. 1853. {West, Stephen. Hessle Grange, near Hull. 1851. *Wesrern, Sir T. B., Bart. Felix Hall, Kelvedon, Essex. 1870. «ie cadet William. 10 Bolton-gardens, South Kensington, Lon- don, W. 1842. Westhead, Edward. Chorlton-on-Medlock, near Manchester. Westhead, John. Manchester. 1842. *Westhead, Joshua Proctor Brown. Lea Castle, near Kidder- minster. 1857. *Westley, William. 24 Regent-street, London, S.W. 1863. {Westmacott, Perey. Whickham, Gateshead, Durham. 1860. {Weston, James Woods. Belmont House, Pendleton, Manchester. 1875. *Weston, Joseph D. Dorset House, Clifton Down, Bristol. 1864. {Wexsrropr, W. H.8., M.R.I.A. Lisdoonvarna, Co. Clare. 1860. {Wesrwoop, John O., M.A., F.L.S., Professor of Zoology in the University of Oxford. Oxford. 1853. {Wheatley, E. B. Cote Wall, Mirfield, Yorkshire. 1866, ec Charles C. 19 Park-crescent, Regent’s Park, London, 1847, A ete Edmund, F.R.A.S. 48 Tollington-road, Holloway, Lon- on, N. 1878. *Wheeler, W. H., C.E. Churchyard, Boston, Lincolnshire. 1873. { Whipple, George Matthew, B.Sc., F.R.A.S, Kew Observatory, Richmond, Surrey. 1874. § Whitaker, Henry,M.D. 11 Clarence-place, Belfast. 1859. *WuITAKER, WILLIAM, B.A., F.G.S. Geological Survey Office, 28 Jermyn-street, London, 8. W. 1876. tWhite, Angus. Easdale, Argyleshire. 1864, {White, Edmund. Victoria Villa, Batheaston, Bath. 1837, | Wauuire, James, F.G.S. 58 Gresham House, Old Broad-street, London, E.O. @ 82 LIST OF MEMBERS. Year of Election. 1876. 1878. 1859. 1865. 1869. 1859. 1877. 1861. 1858. 1861. 1861. 1856. 1871. 1866. 1874. 1852. 1870, 1857. 1874. 1863. 1870. 1878. 1865. 1855. 1857. 1859. 1872. 1869. 1859. 1872. 1870. 1861. 1864, 1861. 1875. 1857. 1870. 1875. 1869. 1877. 1865. *White, James. Overtoun, Dumbarton. § White, John. Medina Docks, Cowes, Isle of Wight. White, John. 80 Wilson-street, Glasgow. {Wuute, Joun Forses. 16 Bon Accord-square, Aberdeen. t{White, Joseph. Regent’s-street, Nottingham. ft White, Laban. Blanford, Dorset. {White, Thomas Henry. Tandragee, Ireland. : *White, William. 365 Euston-road, London, N.W. { Whitehead, James, M.D. 87 Mosley-street, Manchester. { Whitehead, J. H. Southsyde, Saddleworth. *Whitehead, John B. Ashday Lea, Rawtenstall, Manchester. *Whitehead, Peter Ormerod. Belmont, Rawtenstall, Manchester. * Whitehouse, Wildeman, W. O. 12 Thurlow-road, Hampstead, Lon- don, N.W. Whitehouse, William. 10 Queen’s-street, Rhyl. {Whitelaw, Alexander. 1 Oakley-terrace, Glasgow. {Whitfield, Samuel. Golden Hillock, Small Heath, Birmingham. { Whitford, William. 5 Claremont-street, Belfast. t{Whitla, Valentine. Beneden, Belfast. Whitley, Rey. Charles Thomas, M.A., F.R.A.S. Bedlington, Morpeth. § Whittem, James Sibley. Walgrave, near Coventry. *Wuirty, Rev. Joun Irwine, M.A., D.C.L., LL.D. 94 Baggot- street, Dublin. *Whitwell, Mark. Redland House, Bristol. *Whitwell, Thomas. Thornaby Iron Works, Stockton-on-Tees. *Wuirworth, Sir Josrpx, Bart., LL.D., D.C.L., F.R.S. The Firs, Manchester; and Stancliffe Hall, Derbyshire. {Wurrworts, Rey. W. Atten, M.A. 185 Islington, Liverpool. §Wigham, John R. Albany House, Monkstown, Dublin. {Wiggin, Henry. Metchley Grange, Harbourne, Birmingham, {Wilkie, John. Westburn, Helensburgh, N.B. {Wilkinson, George. Temple Hill, Killiney, Co. Dublin. § Wilkinson, Robert. Lincoln Lodge, Totteridge, Hertfordshire. § Wilkinson, William. 168 North-street, Brighton. § Wilks, George Augustus Frederick, M.D. Stanbury, Torquay. *Willert, Alderman Paul Ferdinand. Town Hall, Manchester. {Willet, John, C.E. 35 Albyn-place, Aberdeen. {Wrxerr, Heyry, F.G.S. Arnold House, Brighton. { William, G. F. Copely Mount, Springfield, Liverpool. ‘WILLIAMs, CHartes James, B., M.D., F.R.S. 47 Upper Brook- street, Grosvenor-square, London, W. *Williams, Charles Theodore, M.A., M.B. 47 Upper Brook-street, Grosvenor-square, London, W. *Wittiams, Sir Freprrick, M., Bart., M.P., F.G.S. Goonvrea, Perranarworthal, Cornwall. Babette Samuel, M.A. 28 John-street, Bedford-row, Lon- on, W.C. : *Williams, Herbert A., B.A. 91 Pembroke-road, Clifton, Bristol. { Williams, Rey. James. Llanfairinghornwy, Holyhead. § WILLIAMS, JoHN, F.C.S. 14 Buckingham-street, London, W.C. *Williams, M. B. North Hill, Swansea. Williams, Robert, M.A. Bridehead, Dorset. eo Rey. SrepHen. Stonyhurst College, Whalley, Black- urn. *Williams, W. Carleton, F.C.S. Owens College, Manchester. { Williams, W.M. Belmont-road, Twickenham, near London. LIST OF MEMBERS. 83 Year of Election. 1850. *WILLIAMSON, ALEXANDER WILLIAM, Ph.D., For. Sec. R.S., F.C.S., Corresponding Member of the French Academy, Professor of Chemistry, and of Practical Chemistry, University College, ea (GENERAL TREASURER.) University College, London, W. 1857. { Williamson, Benjamin, M.A. Trinity College, Dublin. 1876. { Williamson, Rey. F. J. Ballantrae, Girvan, N.B. 1863. { Williamson, John. South Shields. 1876.§§ Williamson, Stephen. 19 James-street, Liverpool. Wutiamson, WiirraM O., F.R.S., Professor of Natural History in Owens College, Manchester, 4 Egerton-road, Fallowfield, Manchester. 1865. *Willmott, Henry. Hatherley Lawn, Cheltenham. 1857. { Willock, Rev. W..N., D.D. Cleenish, Enniskillen, Ireland. 1859. *Wills, Alfred,Q.C. 12 King’s Bench-walk, Inner Temple, E.C. 1865. { Wills, Arthur W. Edgbaston, Birmingham. 1874. § Wits, THomas, F.C.S. Royal Naval College, Greenwich, S.E. Wits, W. R. Edgbaston, Birmingham. 1878. § Wilson, Alexander, S., M.A., B.Sc. 124 Bothwell-street, Glasgow. 1859. § Wilson, Alexander Stephen, C.E. North Kinmundy, Summerhill, by Aberdeen. 1876. { Wilson, Dr. Andrew. 118 Gilmore-place, Edinburgh. - 1674. §Witson, Major CO. W., C.B., R.E., F.R.S., F.R.G.S., Director of the ‘ Topographical and Statistical Department of the War Office. Ordnance Survey Office, Dublin. 1850. {Wilson, Dr. Daniel. Toronto, Upper Canada. 1876.§§ Wilson, David. 124 Bothwell-street, Glasgow. 1863. {Wilson, Frederic R. Alnwick, Northumberland. 1847, *Wilson, Frederick. 73 Newman-street, Oxford-street, London, W. Wilson, George. 40 Ardwick-green, Manchester. 1861. {Wilson, George Daniel. 24 Ardwick-green, Manchester. 1875. § Wilson, George Fergusson, F.R.S., F.C.S., F.L.S. Heatherbank, Weybridge Heath, Surrey. 1874. *Wilson, George Orr. Dunardagh, Blackrock, Co, Dublin. 1863, {Wilson, George W. Heron-hill, Hawick, N.B. 1855. { Wilson, Hugh. 75 Glasford-street, Glasgow. 1857. {Wilson, James Moncrieff. Queen Insurance Company, Liverpool. 1865. {Wrtson, Jamzs M., M.A. Hillmorton-road, Rugby. 1858, *Wilson, John. Seacroft Hall, near Leeds. Wuson, Joun, F.G.S., F.R.S.E., Professor of Agriculture in the University of Edinburgh. The University, Edinburgh. 1876. { Wilson, J. G.,M.D., F.R.S.E. 9 Woodside-vrescent, Glasgow. 1876. § Wilson, R. W. R. St. Stephen’s Club, Westminster, 8. W. 1847. *Wilson, Rey. Sumner. Preston Candover Vicarage, Basingstoke. 1863, *Wilson, Thomas. Shotley Hall, Shotley Bridge, Northumber- land. 1861. {Wilson, Thomas Bright. 24 Ardwick-green, Manchester. 1867. { Wilson, Rev. William. Free St. Paul’s, Dundee. 1871. * Wilson, William E. Daramona House, Rathowen, Ireland. 1870. {Wilson, William Henry. 31 Grove-park, Liverpool. 186]. *WiitsHrre, Rev. THomas, M.A., F.G.S., F.L.S., F.R.A.S. 25 Gran- ville-park, Lewisham, London, 8.E. 1877.§§Windeatt, T. W. Dart View, Totnes. 1866. *Windley, W. Mapperley Plains, Nottingham, *Winsor, F. A. 60 Lincoln’s-Inn-fields, London, W.C. 1868. {Winter, CO. J. W. 22 Bethel-street, Norwich. 1863. *Winwoop, Rev. H. H., M.A.,F.G.S. 11 Cavendish-crescent, Bath. G2 84 Year of Election. 1863. 1861. 1870. 1875. 1856. 1878. 1864. 1861. 1871. 1850. 1865. 1861. 1872. 1863. 1870. 1850. 1865. 1871. 1872. 1869. 1866. 1870. LIST OF MEMBERS. *Wood, Collingwood L. Freeland, Bridge of Earn, N.B. *Wood, Edward T. Blackhurst, Brinscall, Chorley, Lancashire. *Wood, George B., M.D. 1117 Arch-street, Philadelphia, United States. *Wood, George 8. 20 Lord-street, Liverpool. *Wood, George William Rayner. Singleton, Manchester. *Woop, Rev. H. H., M.A., F.G.S. Holwell Rectory, Sherborne, Dorset. §Wood, H. Trueman, B.A. Society of Arts, John-street, Adelphi, London, W.C. tWood, Richard, M.D. Driffield, Yorkshire. § Wood, Samuel, F.S.A. St. Mary’s Court, Shrewsbury. tWood, Provost, T. Barleyfield, Portobello, Edinburgh. tWood, Rev. Walter. Elie, Fife. Wood, William. Edge-lane, Liverpool. *Wood, William, M.D. 99 Harley-street, London, W. tWood, William Rayner. Singleton Lodge, near Manchester. §Wood, William Robert. Carlisle House, Brighton. *Wood, Rev. William Spicer, M.A., D.D. Higham, Rochester. *WoopaLL, Major Jonn Woopatt, M.A.,F.G.S. St. Nicholas House, Scarborough. t{Woodburn, Thomas. Rock Ferry, Liverpool. *Woodd, Charles H. L.,F.G.S. Roslyn House, Hampstead, London, N.W. tWoodhill, J. C. Pakenham House, Charlotte-road, Edgbaston, Birmingham. tWoodiwis, James. 51 Back George-street, Manchester. tWoodman, James. 26 Albany-villas, Hove, Sussex. tWoodman, William Robert, M.D. Ford House, Exeter. *Woops, Epwarp, 0.E. 3 Great George-street, Westminster, London, S. W. Woops, Samust. 5 Austin Friars, Old Broad-street, London, E.C. *Woopwarp, C. J., BSc. 76 Francis-road, Edgbaston, Birming- ham. }Woopwarp, Henry, F.R.S., F.G.S. British Museum, London, W.O t Woodward, Horace B., F.G.S. Geological Museum, Jermyn-street, London, 8. W. 1877.§§ Woollecombe, Robert W. 14 St. Jean d’Acre-terrace, Plymouth. 1856. {Woolley, Thomas Smith, jun. South Collingham, Newark. 1872. 1874. 1878. 1863. 1856. 1856. 1871. 1861. { Woolmer, Shirley. 6 Park-crescent, Brighton. Worcester, The Right Rev. Henry Philpott, D.D., Lord Bishop of Worcester. t+ Workman, Charles. Ceara, Windsor, Belfast. §Wormell, Richard, M.A., D.Sc. 165 Loughborough-road, London, S.W *Worsley, Philip J. Rodney Lodge, Clifton, Bristol. *Worthington, Rev. Alfred William, B.A. Old Meeting Parsonage, Mansfield. Worthington, Archibald. Whitchurch, Salop. Worthington, James. Sale Hall, Ashton-on-Mersey. Worthington, William. Brockhurst Hall, Northwich, Cheshire. t{ Worthy, George S. 2 Arlington-terrace, Mornington-crescent, Hamp- stead-road, London, N. W. §Wricut, C. R. A., D.Sc., F.C.S., Lecturer on Chemistry in St. Mary's Hospital Medical School, Paddington, London, W. *Wright, E. Abbot. Castle Park, Frodsham, Cheshire. LIST OF MEMBERS. 85 Year of Election. 1857. 1866. 1876. 1874. 1865. 1855. 1876. 1871. 1867. 1863. 1867. 1871. 1862. }Wrieut, E. Percevat, M.A., M.D., F.LS., M.R.LA., Professor of Botany, and Director of the Museum, Dublin University. 5 Trinity College, Dublin. ; }Wright, G. H. Heanor Hall, near Derby. tWright, James, 114 John-street, Glasgow. tWright, Joseph. Cliftonville, Belfast. tWright, J. S. 168 Brearley-street West, Birmingham. *Wright, Robert Francis. Hinton Blewett, Temple-Cloud, near Bristol. {Wrieut, Toomas, M.D., F.R.S.E., F.G.S., St. Margaret’s-tetrace, Cheltenham. Wright, T. G., M.D, Milnes House, Wakefield. tWright, William. 101 Glassford-street, Glasgow. tWrightson, Thomas. Norton Hall, Stockton-on-Tees. {Witwnscu, Epwarp AtFrep. 146 West George-street, Glasgow. Wyld, James, F.R.G.S. Charing Cross, London, W.C. *Wyley, Andrew. 21 Barker-street, Handsworth, Birmingham. tWylie, Andrew. Prinlaws, Fifeshire. §Wynn, Mrs. Williams. Cefn, St. Asaph. ¢Wynnz, Arraur Busryor, F.G.S., of the Geological Survey of India. Bombay. 1875.§§Yabbicom, Thomas Henry, C.E. 37 White Ladies-road, Clifton, 1865. 1867. 1855. 1877. 1870. 1876. 1876. 1868. 1876. 1871. Bristol. *Yarborough, George Cook. Camp's Mount, Doncaster. {Yates, Edwin. Stonebury, Edgbaston, Birmingham. Yates, James. Carr House, Rotherham, Yorkshire. {Yeaman, James. Dundee. tYeats, John, LL.D., F.R.G.S. Clayton-place, Peckham, London, S.E §Yonge, Rev. Duke. Puslinch, Yealmpton, Devon. tYoune, Jamus, F.R.S. L.& E., F.C.8. Kelly, Wemyss Bay, by Greenock. Young, John. Taunton, Somersetshire, ; tYoune Joun, M.D., Professor of Natural History in the University of Glasgow. 38 Cecil-street, Hillhead, Glasgow. *Young, John, F.0.8. Kelly, Wemyss Bay, by Greenock. Younge, Robert, F.L.S. Greystones, near Sheffield. tYoungs, John. Richmond Hill, Norwich. tYuille, Andrew. 7 Sardinia-terrace, Hillhead, Glasgow. tYuzx, Colonel Hunry, 0.B. East India United Service Club, St. James’s-square, London, 8. W. Year CORRESPONDING MEMBERS. of Election. 1871. HIS IMPERIAL MAJESTY tos EMPEROR or rut BRAZILS. 1868 . M. D’Avesac, Mem. de l'Institut de France. 42 Rue du Bac, Paris. 1866. Captain I. Belavenetz, R.LN., F.R.LG.S., M.S.C.M.A., Superin- 1870. 1872. 1861. 1874. 1868. 1864. 1861. 1864, 1871. 1873. 1870. 1855. 1876. 1872. 1874. 1866. 1862. 1872. 1870. 1845. 1876. 1848. 1861. 1874. 1872. 1856. 1842. 1866. 1861. 1872. 1870. 1876 1852 1866. 1871. 1876 tendent of the Compass Observatory, Cronstadt, Russia. Professor Van Beneden, LL.D. Louvain, Belgium. Ch. Bergeron, C.E, 26 Rue des Penthievre, Paris. Dr: Bergsma, Director of the Magnetic Survey of the Indian Archi- pelago. Utrecht, Holland. M. A. Niaudet Breguet. 39 Quai de l’'Horloge, Paris. Professor Broca. Paris. Dr. H. D. Buys-Ballot, Superintendent of the Royal Meteorological Institute of the Netherlands. Utrecht, Holland. Dr. Carus. Leipzig. M. Des Cloizeaux. Paris. Professor Dr. Colding. Copenhagen. Signor Guido Cora. 17 Via Providenza, Turin. J. M. Crafts, M.D. Dr. Ferdinand Cohn. Breslau, Prussia. Professor Luigi Cremona. The University, Rome. Professor M. Croullebois. 18 Rue Sorbonne, Paris. M. Ch. D’Almeida. 31 Rue Bonaparte, Paris. Dr. Geheimrath von Dechen. Bonn. Wie Delffs, Professor of Chemistry in the University of Heildel- erg. Professor G. Devalque. Liége, Belgium. Dr. Anton Dohrn. Naples. Heinrich Dove, Professor of Natural Philosophy in the University of Berlin. Professor Dumas. Paris. Professor Alberto Eccher. Florence. Professor Esmark. Christiania. Professor A. Favre. Geneva. Dr. W. Feddersen. Leipzig. W. de Fonvielle. Rue des Abbesses, Paris. Professor EK. Frémy. Paris. M. Frisiani. Dr. Gaudry, Pres. Geol. Soc. of France. Paris. Dr. Geinitz, Professor of Mineralogy and Geology. Dresden. Professor Paul Gervais. Museum de Paris. Governor Gilpin. Colorado, United States. . Dr. Benjamin A. Gould, Director of the Argentine National Observa- tory. . Professor Asa Gray. Cambridge, United States, Professor Edward Grube, Ph.D. Breslau. Dr. Paul Gussfeldt, of the University of Bonn. 83 Meckenheimer- strasse, Bonn, Prussia. . Professor Ernst Haeckel. Jena. LIST OF MEMBERS. 87 Year of Election, 1862. 1872. 1864. 1877. 1868. 1872. 1861. 1876. 1867. 1876. 1862, 1876. 1877. 1862. 1861. 1866, 1878. 1874. 1868, 1856. 1877. 1876. 1872. 1877. 1846. 1857. 1871. 1871. . Professor C. 8. Lyman. Yale College, New Haven, United States. . Professor Mannheim. Rue de la Pompe, 11, Passy, Paris. . Professor Ch. Martins, Director of the Jar din des Plants. Montpellier, Dr. D. Bierens de Haan, Member of the Royal Academy of Sciences, Amsterdam. Lieden, Holland. Professor James Hall. Albany, State of New York. M. Hébert, Professor of Geology in the Sorbonne, Paris. Professor H. L. F, Helmholtz. Berlin, A. Heynsius. Leyden. J. E. Hilgard, Assist.-Supt. U.S. Coast Survey. Washington. Dr. Hochstetter. Vienna. Professor von Quintus Icilius. Hanover. Dr. Janssen. 21 Rue Labat (18° Arrondissement), Paris. Dr. W. J. Janssen. The University, Leyden. Charles Jessen, Med. et Phil. Dr., Professor of Botany in the Univer- sity of Greifswald, and Lecturer of Natural History and Librarian at the Royal Agricultural Academy, Eldena, Prussia. Dr. Giuseppe Jung. Milan. M. Akin Karoly. 5 Babenbergerstrasse, Vienna, Aug. Kekulé, Professor of Chemistry.’ Ghent, Belgium: M. Khanikof. 11 Rue de Condé, Paris. Dr. Henry Kiepert, Professor of Geography. Berlin. Dr. Felix Klein. Munich, Bavaria. Dr. Knoblauch. Halle, Germany. Professor Karl Koch. Berlin. Professor A. Kélliker. Wurzburg, Bavaria. Laurent-Guillaume De Koninck, M.D., Professor of Chemistry and Palzeontology in the University of Liége, Belgium. Dr. Hugo Kronecker, Professor of Physiology. 57 Sidonien-strasse, Leipzi Dr. Eee Munich. Professor von Lasaulx. Breslau. Georges Lemoine. 19 Ruedu Sommerard, Paris. Dr. M. Lindeman, Hon. Sec. of the Bremen Geographical Society, Bremen. Baron de Selys-Longchamps. Liége, Belgium. Professor Elias Loomis. Yale College, New Haven, United States. Professor Jacob Liiroth. Carlsruhe, Baden. Dr. Liitken. Copenhagen. France. . Professor P. Merian. Bale, Switzerland. . Professor von Middendorff. St. Petersburg, . Professor J. Milne-Edwards. Paris. . M. PAbbé Moigno. Paris. : . Professor V. L. Moissenet. L’Ecole des Mines, Paris. . Dr. Arnold Moritz. Tiflis, Russia. . Edouard Morren, Professeur de Botanique 4 l'Université de Liége, um, . Dr. T. Nachtigal. Berlin. 2 . Chevalier C. Negri, President of the Italian Geographical Society, Turin, Ital . Herr Newaeayar: \ The Admiralty, Leipziger Platz 12, Berlin. . Professor H. A. Newton. Yale College, New Haven, United States. . Professor Nilsson. Lund, Sweden. . M. E. Peligot, Memb. de YInstitut, Paris. . Professor Benjamin Pierce. Washington, United States. . Gustav Plarr. 22 Hadlow-road, Tunbridge, Kent. 88 LIST OF MEMBERS. Year of Election. 1870. 1868. 1866. 1872. 1873. 1850. 1857. 1857. 1874. 1872. 1873. 1861. 1849, 1876. 1878. 1862, 1864. 1866. 1845. 1871. 1870. 1852. 1864. 1868. 1842. 1874. 1876, 1872. 1875. Professor Felix Plateau. Place du Casino, 15, Gand, Belgium. Professor L. Radkofer, Professor of Botany in the University of Munich. M. de la Rive. Geneva. F. Roemer, Ph.D., Professor of Geology and Paleontology in the University of Breslau. Breslau, Prussia. Professor Victor yon Richter. St. Petersburg. Baron von Richthofen, President of the Berlin Geographical Society. 71 Steglitzer-strasse, Berlin. Professor W. B. Rogers. Boston, United States. Baron Herman de Schlagintweit-Sakiinliinski. Jaegersberg Castle, near Forchheim, Bavaria. Professor Robert Schlagintweit. Giessen. Dr. G. Schweinfurth, Cairo. Professor Carl Semper. Wurzburg, Bavaria. Dr. A. Shafarik. Prague. M. Werner Siemens. Berlin. Dr. Siljestrom. Stockholm. Professor R. D. Silva. Ecole Centrale, Paris. Professor J. Lawrence Smith. Louisville, United States. J. A. de Souza, Professor of Physics in the University of Coimbra, Portugal. Adolph Steen, Professor of Mathematics. Copenhagen. Professor Steenstrup. Copenhagen. Dr. Svanberg. Stockholm. Dr. Joseph Szabo. Pesth, Hungary. Professor Tchebichef. Membre de l’Académie de St. Petersburg. M. Pierre de Tchihatchef, Corresponding Member of the Institute of France. 1 Piazza degli Zuaai, Florence. Dr. Otto Torell, Professor of Geology in the University of Lund, Sweden. Arminius Vambéry, Professor of Oriental Languages in the University of Pesth, Hungary. Professor Vogt. Geneva. Baron Satorius von Waltershausen. Gottingen, Hanover. Professor Wartmann. Geneva. Professor Wiedemann. Leipzig. Professor Adolph Wiillner. Aix-la-Chapelle. Professor A. Wurtz. Paris. Dr, E. L.Youmans. New York. 89 LIST OF SOCIETIES AND PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS TO WHICH A COPY OF THE REPORT IS PRESENTED. GREAT BRITAIN Admiralty, Library of the. Anthropological Institute. Arts, Society of. Asiatic Society (Royal). Astronomical Society (Royal). Belfast, Queen’s College. Birmingham, Institute of Mechanical Engineers. ° —— Midland Institute. Bristol Philosophical Institution. Cambridge Philosophical Society. Chemical Society. Cornwall, Royal Geological Society of. Dublin Geological Society. , Royal Irish Academy. ——., Royal Society of. East India Library. Edinburgh, Royal Society of. Royal Medical Society of. — , Scottish Society of Arts. Enniskillen, Public Library. Engineers, Institute of Civil. Exeter, Albert Memorial Museum. Geographical Society (Royal). Geological Society. Geology, Museum of Practical. Glasgow Philosophical Society. , Institution of Engineersand Ship- builders in Scotland. Greenwich, Royal Observatory. Kew Observatory. AND IRELAND. Leeds, Mechanics’ Institute. ——, Philosophical and Literary So- ciety of. Linnean Society. Liverpool, Free Public Library and Museum. , Royal Institution, London Institution. Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society. , Mechanics’ Institute. Neweastle-upon-Tyne Literary and Philosophical Society. ‘| Nottingham, The Free Library. Oxford, Ashmolean Society. —., Radcliffe Observatory. Plymouth Institution. Physicians, Royal College of. Royal Institution. —— Society. Salford Royal Museum and Library. Statistical Society. Stonyhurst College Observatory. Surgeons, Royal College of. Trade, Board of (Meteorological De- partment). United Service Instiution. War Office, Library of the. Wales (South), Royal Institution of. Yorkshire Philosophical Society. Zoological Society. EUROPE. Alten, Lapland. Literary and Philoso- phical Society. (Berlin... :.......- Der Kaiserlichen Aka- demie der Wissen- schaften. ———sevecereeees Royal Academy of ciences. Breslau ......... Silesian Patriotic So- ciety. PBODN j...00.06+.00 University Library. Brussels ......... Royal Academy of Sciences. Charkow ......... University Library. Copenhagen ...Royal Society of Sciences. Dorpat, Russia . University Library. Frankfort ...... Natural History So- ciety. Geneva ......00 Natural History So- ciety. Gottingen ...... University. Library. Heidelberg ...... University Library. Helsingfors ...... University Library. ° Harlem ......... Société Hollandaise des Sciences. Kasan, Russia... University Library. 90 Kael’? <.scssecseonee Royal Observatory. aris’ occsessctere chool of Mines. Ke yaratee ieee University Library. Pultova ......... Imperial Observatory. Lausanne......... The Academy. INOMEN Se as.ee--t Accademia dei Lyncei. Leyden ......... University Library. as iy oSsinacaniees Collegio Romano. VAG2e) “snssese sess: University Library. See as ves eeeeeee The Italian Society of Lisbon ............ Academia Real des Sciences. Sciences. St. Petersburg . University Library. Milan eus. tea seeess The Institute. | ——_ssaeeeeceeee Imperial Observatory. Modena ......... Royal Academy. Stockholm ...... Royal Academy. Moscow .......+. Society of Naturalists. | Turin ............ Royal Academy of eee cesoetodses University Library. Sciences. Mamighiieees--ars University Library. Utrecht ......... University Library. Naples ..........+- Royal Academy of | Vienna............ The Imperial Library. Sciences, «= | ———_ eaeveeveeeee Central Anstalt fir Nicolaieff......... University Library. Meteorologie und Paris ssvccieetes Geographical Society. Erdmagnetismus. Poo cn: Geological Society. Zurich............General Swiss Society. ———neeseeevecseee Royal Academy of Sciences. ASIA. APTA niss.ceeese The College. Calcutta ......... Hindoo College. Bombay ......... Elphinstone Institu- | —— ............ Hoogly College. ELON GES, teh |b ——“ evesseccesd Medical College. a seep oriens eas Grant Medical Col- | Madras............ The Observatory. Lepey OM bade lave to ee oes University Library. Calcutta ......... Asiatic Society. AFRICA. Cape of Good Hope . . The Observatory. AMERICA. | Ui oaninp. Papscbees The Institute. Philadelphia ...American Philosophi- Boston .......+++++ American Academy of cal Society. Arts and Sciences. | Toronto ......... The Observatory. Cambridge ...... Harvard University | Washington ...Smithsonian Institu- Library. tion. New York ...... Lyceum of Natural | —— ............ United States Geolo- History. gical Survey of the Philadelphia ...American Medical As- _Territories. sociation. AUSTRALIA. Adelaide. . Victoria . . The Colonial Government. . The Colonial Government. Spottiswoode & Co., Printers, New-street Square, London, 50, ALBEMARLE STREET, february, 1879. Mr. Murray's List of Hot Corks. A POPULAR COMMENTARY. The Student's Edition of the Speaker's Commentary on the Holy Bible. Abridged and Edited by JOHN M. FULLER, M.A. Vicar of Bexley, formerly Fellow of St. John’s College, Cambridge. To be completed in 6 Volumes. Vol. I. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. The Speaker's Commentary on the Bible has secured for itself a recognized place as the foremost work of its class available for English readers. Numerous testimonies to the merits of this work, and to the fact that it meets a real want in religious literature, have been received from various countries and different schools of thought. America and Germany, Churchmen and Nonconformists, clergymen and laymen, have alike found in its pages wise and liberal views upon points of confessedly disputed interpretation, and a storehouse of scholarship and research upon questions philosophical, archzeological, and historical. The object of the present Abridgment is to give information sufficient to enable any reader to understand the Holy Scriptures, to acquaint him with the conclusions of learned inyestiga- tions, and to supply him with satisfactory answers to current misinterpretations. ee The Bedouins of the Euphrates Valley. By Lady ANNE BLUNT. Edited, with a Preface and some Account of the Arabs and their Horses, by W. S. B. With Map and Tilustrations. 2 Vols, Crown 8vo. “Lady Anne Blunt is entitled by descent to be an authoress, since she is the grand-daughter of Lord Byron. Having previously explored the Sahara south of the Atlas range, she spent last winter with her husband among the wandering Arabs of the Syrian desert. Admitted by their hosts to the privileges, not only of hospitality but of sworn brotherhood, the travellers lived with them in their tents, moved with their encampments, and were even spectators of some of their feuds and strifes. Although the chief tribes were in arms, and war was raging in the desert at the time, the English visitors were honoured as friends and admitted to all the privacies of tent life."—A¢heneum. > Gleanings of Past Years, 1843-78. By the Right Hon. W. E. GLADSTONE, M.P. 6 Vols. Small 8vo. 2s. 6d. each. Vou. I.—THE THRONE AND THE PRINCE CONSORT, THE CABINET, AND CONSTITUTION . : - : 3 3 . >» Ready, VoL. IT.—PERSONAL AND LITERARY VoL. JII.—HiIsTORICAL AND SPECULATIVE C : “ - VoL. 1V.—FoREIGN . 2 b ; P 6 - 5 - « » Lit the Press. Vos, V. AND VI.—ECCLESIASTICAL . ; 4 : = 5 - MR. MURRAY’S LIST OF NEW WORKS. iS) DR. SMILES’ NEW WORKS. Life of Thomas Edward, Shoemaker of Banff, Scotch Naturalist. With Portrait and 30 Lllustrations. Crown 8vo. 10s. 6d. Life of Robert Dick, Baker of Thurso, Geologist and Botanist. With Portrait and 50 Lllustrations. Crown 8vo. 12s. “Tt was my gratification, a second time, to meet with a remarkable man in the town of Thurso, named Robert Dick, a baker by trade. I am proud to call him my distinguished friend. Here is a man who is earning his daily bread by hard work, who is obliged to read and study by night ; and yet who is able to instruct the Director-General of the Geographical Society.”—SIR RODERICK MURCHISON. ——— Flistory of Eeypt under the Pharaohs. Derived entirely from Monuments. WITH A MEMOIR ON THE EXODUS OF THE ISRAELITES. By HENRY BRUGSCH BEY. Translated by H. DANBY SEYMOUR and PHILIP SMITH, B.A. With Maps and Illustrations. 2 Vols. 8vo. 30s. The History of Egypt now offered to the English reader is distinct from the long train of able and interesting works which, in opening to the last and the present generations the life and story of the Old Egyptians, as by a new revelation, have at the same time thrown a clear and vivid light on many portions of Holy Scripture. It embodies the Herculean task of weaving the testimony of the Egyptian records, whether inscribed on the raonuments or written on the countless rolls of papyrus, into a consecutive history, derived solely from these ancient and authentic sources, and free from all the colouring of external traditions. Six Months in Ascension. An Unscientific Account of a Scientific Expedition. By Mrs. GILL. PREFACED BY A BRIEF AND POPULAR HISTORY OF THE METHODS EMPLOYED TO DISCOVER THE SUN’s DISTANCE FROM THE EARTH. By DAVID GILL. With Map. Crown 8vo. 9s. A Scientific Expedition may be said to have two histories. The one treats of the special objects of the Expedition, the other of the personal adventures of those concerned in it. It is only the former which finds permanent record in the transactions of Scientific Societies ; the latter too often remains unwritten. This little work must be regarded as ove side of the history of ove step, and derives its interest from its truthfulness as a record of an attempt to solve a great problem, viz., é#e Distance of the Earth from the Sun. MR. MURRAY’S LIST OF NEW WORKS. 3) The Manners and Customs of the Anctent Egyptians. Their Private Life, Government, Laws, Arts, Manufactures, Religion, Agriculture, Early Fis- tory, &c., derived from a Comparison of the Paintings, Sculptures, and Monuments still existing, with the Accounts of Ancient Authors. By SIR J. GARDNER WILKINSON, F.R.S. A New Edition, with Additions by the late Author. Revised and Edited By SAMUEL BIRCH, LL.D. With Coloured Plates and 500 Illustrations. 3 Vols. Medium 8vo. 84s. “The present edition has been prepared from the notes and manuscript which the late Sir Gardner Wilkinson left behind, with the addition of fresh matter contributed by the Editor. Very little of the original text has been omitted, and only those statements and opinions which the progress of science no longer regards as useful or correct ; while new views and facts acquired by the progress of Egyptian research have been embodied in notes or inserted in the text. “The great merit of the acute observation of the Author, and the exhaustive illustrations of Egyptian manners and customs as depicted by the monuments, have made the present work a text-book on the subject, both for the general public and individual students ; its chief excellence consists in the great trouble which the author took in explaining and comparing Egyptian and Greek notions."—£ditor's Preface. ILLUSTRATED EDITION OF Lhe Wild Sports and Natural Flrstory of the Flighlands of Scotland. By CHARLES ST. JOHN. The [lustrations by \VHYMPER, CORBOULD, COLLINS, ELWES, ava HARRISON WEIR. With 70 Woodcuts of Birds, Beasts, Views, &c. Crown 8vo. 155. Though this work is admitted to take rank with White’s ‘‘Selborne’’ and Walton's “‘Angler,”’ no attempt has hitherto been made to illustrate the scenes, anecdotes, and /ere natur@é so graphically described by Mr. St. John. ‘This want—to which attention has often been called—it is the object of the present edition to supply. Great pains have been taken in illustrating this edition, accurately to enter into the spirit, and, where possible, to depict the actual scene of the events described in the text. “To the naturalist who loves to know the habits of an animal in its native haunts, this book must be a treasure. Every picture in the book is a masterpiece in its way." —JVature. fresearches into the Early H Lhe Cities and Cemeteries of Etruria. By GEORGE DENNIS. A New Epition. REVISED AND ENLARGED SO AS TO INCORPORATE ALL THE MOST RECENT DISCOVERIES. With Maps and 200 Tilustrations. 2 Vols. Medium 8vo. 42s. “Since the publication of the former edition of this work in 1848, many important discoveries have been made in Etruria; and the interest in such discoveries has so greatly increased that museums have been established in not a few provincial towns, and private collections have become numerous. I have had the gratification of learning that the former edition of this work, apart from literary and antiquarian considerations, has received the approval of not a few who have used it as a guide, on account of the conscientious accuracy of its descriptions. I trust that the present issue will maintain its reputation in this respect, for to ensure correctness has been my primary endeavour."—Author's Preface. “A very full and valuable book, which everyone interested in art and archeology should read.” —Builder. —_ > —_—_ Lritish Burma and its People ; Sketches of the Native Manners, Customs, and Religion. By Capt. C. J. F. S. FORBES, F.R.G.S., M.R.A.S., &c., Officiating Deputy-Commissioner, British Burma. Crown 8vo. 10s. 6d. CONTENTS: SUPERSTITIONS, FOLK-LORE, &c. WILD TRIBES OF BRITISH BURMA, BURMAN BUDDHISM. THE BURMAN PHOONGYEES OR MONKS. LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE, PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY. THE RACES OF BRITISH BURMA, SoctAL LIFE AND MANNERS, AGRICULTURE, TRADES, &c. AMUSEMENTS. FESTIVALS AND FEASTs. ‘‘ A province which has within the Jast twenty years more than doubled its revenue and its population, and more than trebled its commerce, we think deserves to be a little better known to all classes." —A uthor's Preface. “We can confidently recommend a perusal of Captain Forbes’ book.” —Fie/d. MR. MURRAY’S LIST OF NEW WORKS. 5 A Descriptive Catalogue of the Etched Work of Rembrandt Von Rhyn ; preceded by a Life and Genealogy. By CHAS. H. MIDDLETON, B.A. With 12 Plates. Medium 8vo. 315. 6d. ‘Having for five and twenty years been an earnest admirer of the works of the great Dutch Master, and having acquainted myself with the well-known Catalogues, I have long been of opinion that there is room for another which, while it presents an accurate account of the various States in which these etched works exist, shall form an index to the large public collections, and by a careful re-arrangement shall give a clearer view of Rembrandt's work as - whole and convey an idea of the order in which the several works were executed.""—A uthor's reface. i Lectures on the Rise and Development of Medieval Architecture. Delivered at the Royal Academy. By Sir G GILBERT SCOTT, R.A. CONTENTS: Tue CLAIMs OF MEDLZVAL ARCHITEC- | THE XIIITH CENTURY. TURE UPON OUR STUDY. RATIONALE OF GOTHIC ARCHITECTURE. SKETCH OF THE RISE OF MEDI#VAL | A DIGRESSION CONCERNING WINDOWS. ARCHITECTURE. THE PRACTICAL STUDY OF GOTHIC THE TRANSITION. ARCHITECTURE. DoMEs, &c, With 450 Illustrations. 2 Vols, Medium 8vo. 42s. + The Witness of the Psalms to Chrest and Christianity. THE BAMPTON LECTURES, 1876. By WILLIAM ALEXANDER, D.D., D.C.L., Lorp BisHor OF DERRY AND RAPHOE, Second Edition, Revised and greatly Enlarged. 8vo. 145. “The Bishop has chosen a grand and noble subject; one which he is pre-eminently qualified to deal with, and on which we have no hesitation in saying he has given us, not an exhaustive—for when will the fountain of inspired song cease to flow ?—but a solid, instructive, and a most charming book.’ —Yohn Bull. Qs The Temples of the Fews, and the other Buildings in the Haram Area at Ferusalem. By JAMES FERGUSSON, F.R.S. With Plates and Woodcuts. 40. 42s. ‘Mr, Fergusson’s splendid volume, is unquestionably a work that has severely taxed his thought and his time, and reflects great credit on the industry, enthusiasm and ability to which it so amply testifies.” —Morning Post. 6 MR. MURRAY’S LIST OF NEW WORKS. Cyprus; tts Frstory, Art, and A ntiguattes. A Narrative of Researches and Excavations during Ten Years Residence in that Island. By General LOUIS P. DI CESNOLA. With Map and 400 Illustrations. Medium 8vo. 50s. “‘Incomparably the best English book on the subject.” —Saturday Review. ‘«The work is well written, and as diverting as it is instructive.” — Z?mes. —_—__@—__—__ A SECOND SERIES OF Classic Preachers of the Eenghsh Church. LECTURES DELIVERED AT ST. JAMES’S, 1878. CONTENTS: BULL (The Primitive Preacher) ....60ccceceees Rev. W. WARBURTON, M.A. HORSLEY (The Scholarly Preacher) ...... Lorp BisHop or ELy. TAYLOR (The English Chrysostom)......... CANON BARRY, SANDERSON (The Fudicious Preacher)... LORD BISHOP OF DERRY AND RAPHOE. TILLOTSON (he Practical Preacher)...... Rrv. W. G. Humpnry, B.D. ANDREWES (The Catholic Preacher)...... Rev. H. J. Nortu, M.A. Post 8vo. 75. 6d. ‘This second series will not be less acceptable than the former, which, so deservedly, met with large approval." — Scottish Guardian. a The Student's Elements of Geology. By SIR CHARLES LYELL, Bart. Third Edition, thoroughly Revised. With 600 Tllustrations. Post 8vo. 9s. ‘«The present edition has been revised and corrected throughout, receiving such additions and corrections as the results of more recent investigations seemed to require. At the same time care has been taken not to alter the original character of the book."—Zditor’s Preface. ‘Sir Charles Lyell has here done for the geological student what Sir John Herschel did for the student of astronomy in his incomparable ‘Outlines.’ Young beginners in natural science had long wanted a short manual of geology at a reasonable price, which should yet contain a full explanation of the leading facts and principles of the science. Now they have it.” —Axaminer. A Manual of Naval Architecture. For the Use of Officers of the Royal Navy and Mercantile Marine, Shipowners, Shipbuilders, and Vachtsmen. By W. H. WHITE, Assistant-Constructor, Royal Navy. With 130 Illustrations. 8vo. 245. ““Mr. White’s manner is excellent, and as his work embraces in a concise and elear form all that is at present known of naval science, it can conscientiously be recommended as a trustworthy preceptor. All who take an interest in ships, whether they be war, merchant, or es ships, such as yachts, will find in the ‘Manual’ all that science can teach them.”— ield. MR. MURRAY’S LIST OF NEW WORKS. 7 DR. SCHLIEMANN’S WORKS. Troy and its Remains. A Narrative of Discoveries and Researches made on the Site of Llium, and in the Trojan Plain. With 500 Illustrations. Medium 8vo. 425. Mycene and Tiryns. A Narrative of Researches and Discoveries on the Sites of those Cities. The Preface by the Right Hon. W. E. GLapsTONE, M.P. With Maps and 500 Illustrations. Medium 8vo. 50s. “Dr. Schliemann may fairly be called the creator of Homeric archzeology."— 77mes. ——_ ¢+-——— Old Enghsh Plate: Ecclesiastical, Deco- vative and Domestic. Its Makers and Marks. With Improved Tables of the Date Letters used in England, Scotland, and Lreland. By WILFRED JOSEPH CRIPPS, M.A., Barrister-at-Law. With 80 Illustrations. Medium 8vo. 215. ‘« We may confidently say that ‘Cripps on Old English Plate’ will henceforth be found on the shelves of every library worthy of the name, and be recognized for what it is—the best work on its own subject," —Pad/ Mall Gazette. ¢ Pioneering tn South Brazil. Three Years of Forest and Prairie Life in the Province of Parana. By THOS. P. BIGG WITHER. With Map and Illustrations. 2 Vols. Post 8vo. 245. ‘‘Volumes of genuine and varied interest and much instruction. Mr. Wither is an excellent observer, and his book abounds with information on the natives, the natural history and physical geography of the region. He met with many adventures and suffered much from heat and insects, but altogether he seems to have had a thoroughly enjoyable time of it. He writes throughout in an attractive and simple style, and his work must be regarded as an important contribution to a knowledge of the luxuriant region with which it deals." —/Vature, 8 MR. MURRAY’S LIST OF NEW WORKS. HANDBOOKS FOR TRAVELLERS. fing. land and Wales » Alphabetically arranged, and forming a Companion Volume to Bradshaw's hawlway Tables. With Map. Post vo. tos. L urkey wm Asia; Constantinople, The Bosphorus, Dardanelles, Plain of T roy, Brousa, Cyprus, Rhodes, Smyrna, Ephesus, Coasts of the Black Sea, Armenia, Luphrates Valley route to India, Gc. New Edition. Maps and Plans. Post 8vo. tos. A loer za and Tunts , Carthage, Algiers, Constan- tine, Oran, the Atlas Range, 6c. New Edition. Maps. Post 8vo. tos. Northampton and Rutland ; Peterborough, Tow- cester, Daventry, Market Harborough, Kettering, Wellingborough, Thrapston, Stamford, Uppingham, Oakham, &c. Map. Post 8vo. 7s. 6d. lreland » Dublin, Belfast, Giant's Causeway, Donegal, Galway, Wexford, Cork, Limerick, Waterford, Wick- low, Killarney, Bantry, Glengarif, Gc. Revised Edition. Maps and Plans. Post 8vo. 10s. ——_ — &——_—_ Purity in Musical Art. By A. F. JUSTUS THIBAUT. TRANSLATED FROM THE GERMAN, WITH A PREFATORY MEMOIR, By W. H. GLADSTONE, M.P. Post 8vo. 7s. 6d. ‘The general aim of the volume is so high, and its whole tone so excellent, that it is well worth reading. The translation, which is dedicated to the Bach Choir, is exceedingly good.” —Academy, ee Litian. Llis Life and Times, with some Account of his Family, chiefly from Unpub- lished Records. By J. A. CROWE, and G. B. CAVALCASELLE. Portrait and Illustrations. 2 Vols. S8vo. 42s. ‘No such gap has existed in the history of art as that which is filled by the present volumes. Everything on the subject is now superseded. We cannot make an abstract of nine hundred pages ; suffice it to repeat that the book is by far the most important contribution made in our time to the history of art.” —A theneum. a oa MR. MURRAY’S LIST OF NEW WORKS. 9 The People of Turkey; a Twenty Ye cars Residence among the Bulgarians, Greeks, Albanians, Turks, and Armenians. By AN ENGLISH CONSUL’S WIFE. Edited by STANLEY LANE POOLE. 2 Vols. Crown 8v0. 215% “Tt is a real pleasure to come at last upon a work which bears the stamp of genuine knowledge of the subject, and of serious endeavour to rise out of the false lights of party doctrine and tell us simply what manner of men these people of Turkey are.” —Zzmes. Leaves from my Sketch Book. A Selection Jrom Sketches made during many Tours. By E. W. Cooks, R.A. 50 Plates. 2 Vols. Small folio. 318. 6a. each. First Series :—Paris—Arles—Monaco—Nuremburg—S witzerland—Rome—Egypt, &c. SECOND SERIES :—Venice—Naples—Pompeii—Pestum—The Nile, &c, ** An acceptable work, whether for the drawing-table of fashionable d/ettante, or for study by art tyros. The illustrations form, of course, the most important portion of the contents, and the majority of these deserve high praise, both for correctness of drawing and clear engraving.” —G/ole. >—— Field Paths and Green Lanes; an Account of Rambles in Survey, Sussex, and Flerefordshire. By LOUIS J. JENNINGS. Second Edition. Illustrated by J. WW. WHYMPER. Jost 8vo. 10s. 6d. ‘*There is a breeziness and freshness about this pleasant volume which will commend it equally to dwellers in town and country. Mr. Jennings writes simply and easily, with a purpose and without a moral. In all places he finds something appropriate to say, something fresh to point out, something worthy to describe.'""—Axaminer. ad Scepticism in Geology, and the Reasons for it. An Assemblage of Facts from Nature com- bining to tnvalidate and refute the Geological Theory of “ Causes now tn Action.” By VERIFIER. Second Edition Revised. With Woodcuts. Post 8vo. 6s. “A sprightly little book called ‘Scepticism in Geology’ has recently shown that ‘orthodox’ geologists may possibly have misinterpreted scme of the most important texts from which they preach their sermons on stones,""—Sfec/ator, to MR. MURRAY’S LIST OF NEW WORKS. $$$ é ST. JAMES’S LECTURES. I.—1875-76.—Companions for the Devout Life. With Preface by Rev. J. E. Kempr, M.A., Rector of St. James's. Post 8vo. 6s. ‘©A volume of more than ordinary interest. ‘The books selected are well known, and favourites with large numbers of readers. ‘The lecturers have all treated their respective subjects simply and practically, their aim having been to make these ‘Companions to the Devout Life’ more companionable and useful than they have hitherto been." —Church Review. II.—1877-78.—Classic Preachers of the English Church. 2 vols. Post 8vo. 7s. 6d. each. ‘*Masterly as these discourses are, it is not as sermons that we regard them, ‘This criticism apart—and it does not really touch the substantial merits of these volumes—there is little but what we can unreservedly praise.""—Spectator. ——— My Boyhood; a True Story of Country Life and Adventures for the Old and Young. By H. C. BARKLEY. Author of “ Bulgaria North of the Balkans.” With Miustrations by CORBOULD. Jost 8vo. 6s, “ This is about as good a book of its kind as we have ever seen." — Spectator, “The adventures are so plainly real, and are told with such total absence of egotism although personal, that boys will thoroughly appreciate them. It is the genuine biography of a typical boy.” —Pudlic Opinion. England and Russia wn the East. A Series of Papers on the Political and Geo- graphical Condition of Central Asia. By Major-Gen. Sir HENRY RAWLINSON, K.C.B., F.R.S. Member of the Council of India. Second Edition. Map. 8vo. 125. ‘© valuable contribution to the modern history of Central Asia. There is ne single chapter which does not merit careful study, and none from which the reader will rise without a solution of some disputed point in geography, without a more distinct light thrown back on Oriental tendencies and traditions, and withcut a more clear conception of the single- mindedness, the persistence, and the adaptation of means to ends, displayed by Russian autocrats of the field or Cabinet, in carrying out the policy of Peter the Great."”—Saturday Review. o——_ A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of Predestination. By the late JU. B. MOZLEY, D.D., Canon of Christ Church. New Edition. Crown 8vo. 9s. “Mr. Mozley has contributed a volume which we believe will live. His plummet has sounded the depths of controversies which have engaged the most luminous minds for ages, and he comes to the only conclusion concerning them which it is in the province of the human mind to form.”—7he Press. MR. MURRAY’S LIST OF NEW WORKS. tI ———— Masters in Eenglish Theology. The King's College Lectures, 1877. Post 8vo. 7s. 6d. CONTENTS: Hooker, Canon Barry. Wi iIcHco're and Smitit, Canon Westcott. ANDREWES, Dean of St. Paul’s. Jeremy Tayior, Canon Farrar. CHILLINGWoRTH, Professor Plumptre. P£ARSON, Professor Cheetham. With an Introduction by ALFRED BARRY, D.D. «The whole series of lectures is most scholarly and able, and will do much to sharpen the reader's appreciation of this interesting period of our Church history. The great men whose names head these lectures are sketched for us by firm and skilful hands. ‘ Masters in Theology’ ought to take a noticeable place among our current theological literature."— Literary Churchman. — > A History of the Englhsh Church. From the Accession of Henry VIL. to the Silencing of Convocation in the 18th Century. By G. G. PERRY, M.A., Hon. Canon of Lincoln, and Rector of Waddington. Post 8vo. 75. 6d. “Canon Perry's ‘ History of the English Church,’ is, in brief, the best book of its kind that we have ever read, and we strongly advise the adoption of it as a text book in theological seminaries.""—Literary Churchman. ———-{ ~ —_— The Talmud; Selected Extracts from ut, chiefly tllustrating the Teaching of the Bible. Wath an Introduction describing its general Character. By Rev. JOSEPH BARCLAY, LL.D. Tilustrations. 8vo. 145. “Dr. Barclay has admirably performed the task which he assigned to himself, and as the result, we have a deeply interesting volume, which will be sure to receive a cordial welcome from Biblical students as a most valuable addition to standard works of reference.’’— English Independent. ———_- > —— A Manual of Ecclesiastical Ffrstory during the First Ten Centuries; from gts Foundation to the Full Establishment of the Holy Roman Enipire and the Papal Power. By PHILIP SMITH, B.A. Author of ‘‘ The Student’s Old and New Testament Histories.” Iilusirations. Post 8vo. 7s. 6d. ‘We can.recommend this as a very useful manual, by a painstaking and conscientious writer." —School Guardian, 12 MR. MURRAY’S LIST OF NEW WORKS. Nyassa. A Fournal of Occurrences tn Exploring the Lake, and Establishing the Missionary and Commercial Settlement of “ Livingstonia.” By E. D. YOUNG, R.N. Edited by Rev. HORACE WALLER, F.R.G.S. Second Edition. With Maps. Post 8vo. 7s. Cd. “This Journal will serve many purposes rarely served by books of travel in that quarter of the world. . . . One of the most gratifying features in the charming volume is the evidence it affords abundantly of the affection and honour with which the English are welcomed in the heart of Africa.” —Standard. —_+——_ Notes on the Churches of Kent. By the late SIR STEPHEN R. GLYNNE, Bart. With a Preface by W. H. GLADSTONE, M.P. With Illustrations. S8wvo. 2s. ‘€A book which will be very valuable to the archzeologist, and we hope that the present instalment will be so successful as to lead to a publication of the complete notes, which will form a most acceptable contribution to the history of church architecture in England. In the meantime the portion now published contains much in which dwellers in Kent will take especial interest." —-Fohn Dull. A Visit to the Sacred City of the Moors. A Fourney from Tripoli in Barbary to the Holy City of Kairwan. By EDWARD RAE, Author of the “ Land of the North Wind.” With Map and 6 Etchings. Crown 8vo. 125. “Mr. Rae's pleasant and amusing narrative contains information which is of considerable value to historical students. We can say of it with truth, what certainly cannot be said of the great majority of modern books of travel, that its publication is a distinct gain to our literature,’"—Academy. The Tower of London. Notices of Flrstorie Persons buried in the Chapel of the Tower of London. With an Account of the Discovery of the supposed Remains of Queen Anne Boleyn. By DOYNE C. BELL, F.S.A. With 24 Illustrations. 8vo. 145, ‘This volume has been executed with industry and care, and is full of curious reading ; it is one which we can heartily recommend.” —Spectator, vT MR. MURRAY’S LIST OF NEW WORKS. 13 Notebook of Sir Fohn Northcote, M.P. am the Long Parliament. Containing Memoranda of Proceedings during tts First Sesston, 1640. from the MS. in the possession of Sir Stafford Northcote, Bart. Edited, with a Memoir, by A. H. A. HAMILTON. Crown 8vo. 95. “ This work opens up a subject of singular interest both to the student of history and the more general reader,..... We recommend it heartily.” —S¢axdard. y —E— Freedom of Science in the Modern State. By RUDOLPH VIRCHOW, Professor of Pathology in the University of Berlin. Second Edition. Feap. 8ve. 25. ‘This remarkable pamphlet is a speech by a scientific man in Germany, whose authority no man of science in any country will dispute. The name of Professor Virchow is at the present day, and must always remain, one of the most distinguished in the history of pathological research. It was delivered at the annual gathering of German Natural Philo- sophers and Physicians of Munich,’"—Quwarterly Review, January, 1878. ——— es Dictionary of Christian Antiquities. Com- prising the History, Institutions, and Antiquities of the Christian Church, from the Time of the Apostles to the Age of Charlemagne. By Various WRITERS. Edited by WM. SMITH, D.C.L., & Rev. Professor CHEETHAM, M.A. With Tlustrations. (To be completed in 2 vols.) Vol. I, Medium 8vo, 31s. 6d. A Dictionary of Christian Biography, Literature, Sects, and Doctrines. From the Time of the Apostles to the Age of Charlemagne. By VARIOUS WRITERS. Edited by WM. SMITH, D.C.L., and Rev. Professor WACE, M.A. (Zo be completed in 3, vols.) Vol. I. Medium 8vo. 315s. 6d. 14 MR. MURRAY’S LIST OF NEW WORKS. lhe Speaker's Commentary on the Bible. Explanatory and Critical, with a Revision of the Translation. Edited by F. C. COOK, M.A., Canon of Exeter. OLD TESTAMENT, Complete in 6 Vols. Medium 8vo. £6 155. Vot. I.—Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, | | VoL. 1V.—Job, Psalms, Proverbs, Eccle- Numbers, Deuteronomy. 30s. siastes, Song of Solomon. 245. Vor. V.—Isaiah, Jeremiah, Lamenta- Vors. II. and III.—Joshua, Judges, | ticns. 20s, Ruth, Samuel, Kings, Chronicles, Ezra = : : i Neteraiali Esther, abr: ? ? bmn ae Daniel, The Minor NEW TESTAMENT. To be completed in 4 Vols. Medium 8vo. Editor. ST. Mark, The Editor. St. Luke, W. Basil Jones, D.D., Bishop of St. David’s, and The Editor. 18s. Vol. I.:— GENERAL INTRODUCTION, Wm. Thomson, D.D., Archbishop of York, St. MattHew, H. L. Mansel, D.D., late Dean of St. Paul’s, and The See An Atlas of Ancient Geography. Bibhcal and Classical. Intended to illustrate Smith's Classical and Biblical Dictionaries, and the “ Speaker's Commentary on the Bible.” Compiled under the Superintendence of WM. SMITH, D.C.L., and GEORGE GROVE, F.R.G.S. WITH DESCRIPTIVE TEXT, GIVING THE SOURCES AND AUTHORITIES, INDICES, &c. With 43 Maps. Folio, half-bound. £6 6s. eee Annals of Winchcombe and Sudeley. By EMMA DENT. With 120 Portraits, Plates, and Woodcuts. Ato. 42s. ‘This is a thoroughly pleasant book, delightful to read and beautiful to look upon, with its large, clearly printed pages and variety of well-executed illustrations. One chief pleasure of reading Mrs. Dent's book is the variety of social matters which are touched upon and illustrated.” —A theneum, 50, ALBEMARLE STREET, February, 1879. MR. MURRAY’S LIST OF WORKS IN PREPARATION. The Life of Samuel Wilberforce, D.D., LORD BISHOP OF OXFORD AND WINCHESTER. By REV. A. R. ASHWELL, M.A., Canon of the Cathedral and Principal of the Theological College, Chichester. With Portraits, &c. To be completed in 3 vols. Vol. I. $8vo. Adventures and Discoveries among the Lakes and Mountains of Eastern Africa. From the Journals of the late CAPT. F. ELTON, Late of the Prince of Wales's Regiment of Foot, and A. D. C, to Lord Strathnairn, and H.B.M. Consul in Mozambique. Edited and Completed by H. B. COTTERILL, F.R.G.S. With 3 Maps and Illustrations from the Author’s sketches. $yo. “Knowing that I have broken entirely new ground, I believe I have some acceptable experiences of interest to relate, and therefore I invoke those kindly powers to my assistance who enable mortal man to tell a story worth the hearing : who kindly show him where he is to begin it and where he is to end it, what he is to put into it and what he is to leave out, how much of it he is to cast into a shade and whereabouts he is to throw his light,""—CoNsuL ELTON. 1 MR. MURRAY’S LIST OF WORKS IN PREPARATION. Word, Work, and Will. COLLECTED PAPERS By the LORD ARCHBISHOP OF YORK. Crown 8vo. Memoir of Bishop Stanley. WITH EXTRACTS FROM THE JOURNALS anp LETTERS oF uis Wipow, CATHERINE STANLEY. By A. P. STANLEY, D.D., Dean of Westminster. Revised and ssh dae Edition. Crown Svo. A History of Ameen Geography. By E. H. BUNBURY, F.R.G.S. 2vols. 8vo. A New Life of Albert Durer. With A HISTORY OF HIS ART, By MORITZ THAUSING, Keeper of Archduke Albert’s Art Collections at Vienna. TRANSLATED FROM THE GERMAN WITH THE AUTHOR’S SANCTION, With Portrait and Illustrations. 2 vols. Medium Svo. The Cathedral : Its Necessary Place in the Life and Work of the Church. By EDWARD WHITE BENSON, D.D., Lord Bishop of Truro. Crown 8vo. 6s. (Ready) Life of St. Hugh “a Avalon, Bishop | of Lincoln. By GEO. G. PERRY, Hon. Canon of LINCOLN & Rector of Waddingter, and Author of ‘ History of the English Church.” With Portrait. Crown 8vo. oe ee ee MR. MURRAY'S LIST OF WORKS IN PREPARATION. 17 The Italian Principia. Part I. A FIRST ITALIAN COURSE, CONTAINING A GRAMMAR, DELECTUS EXERCISE BOOK, WITH VOCABULARIES, AND MATERIALS FOR ITALIAN CONVERSATION. ON THE PLAN oF Dr. WILLIAM SMITH’sS PRINCIPIA LATINA. By SIGNOR RICCI. I2mo, The Greek Verb, ITS STRUCTURE AND DEVELOPMENT. By PROFESSOR G. CURTIUS, Of the University of Leipzig. Translated into English, with the Author’s sanction, By A. S. WILKINS, M.A., Professor of Latin and Comparative Philology, and E. B. ENGLAND, M.A., Assistant Lecturer in Classics, Owens College, Manchester. 8vo. Medieval Latin-English Dictionary. In IMITATION OF THE GREAT WorK OF DUCANGE, Re-arranged and Edited in accordance with the Modern Science of Philology. E. A. DAYMAN, B.D., Prebendary of Sarum, formerly Fellow and Tutor of Exeter College, Oxford. Assisted by J. H. HESSELS. Small 4to. j Metallu rey. THE ART OF EXTRACTING METALS FROM THEIR ORES, AND ADAPTING THEM TO VARIOUS PURPOSES OF MANUFACTURE. Silver. By JOHN PERCY, M.D., F.RS., Lecturer on Metallurgy at the Government School of Mines. With numerous Illustrations. 8vo. The Lex Salica; THE TEN EMENDED TEXTS WITH THE GLOSSES. EDITED (THE INTERPRETATION OF THE GLOSSES) _ By Dr. H. KERN, Professor of Sanscrit, University of Leyden. Tur TEXTS, NEWLY COLLATED, WITH GLOSSARY, INTRODUCTION, &c., By J. H. HESSELS, Joint Editor of The New Ducange’s ‘“‘ Medieval Latin-English Dictionary.’ 4to. 18 MR. MURRAY’S LIST OF WORKS IN PREPARATION. Dictionary of Christian Biography, Literature, Sects, and Doctrines. By Various WRITERS. Edited by WM. SMITH, D.C.L., and HENRY WACE, M.A. (To be completed in 3 vols.) Vol. 2. Medium 8vo., In this volume the articles on Anglo-Saxon History have been contributed chiefly by Professor Stubbs and Professor Bright, of Oxford, and by Canon Raine, of York. Dr. Benson, the Bishop of Truro, has treated all names connected with St. Cyprian. The Dean of Canterbury has written on Ephraim Syrus. Professor Lightfoot contributes an article on Eusebius the historian, Professor Lipsius, of Jena, has contributed articles on Epiphanius, and the Apocryphal Gospels. Professor Swainson has written on the Rule of Faith, the Incarnation, and some kindred subjects. Professor Salmon, of Dublin, has treated Gnosticism and many important names connected with that subject. P/ofessor Bright contributes articles on the Alexandrian Fathers, and the Rev. % Barmby, of Durham, on the Popes. Professor Bryce, of Oxford, has treated Justinian. Other important articles are contributed by the Rev. ¥. Garmby of Durham, the Rev. C. IV. Boase, of Exeter College, Oxford, 7. 2. Buchanan, Esq., of All Souls’ College, the Rev. Chancellor Cazenove, of Edinburgh, the Rev. % Llewellyn Davies, the Rev. Professor Dickson, of Glasgow, the Rev. Canon Liliott, the Rev. E. S. Ffoulkes, the Rev. Canon Venables, the Hon. and Rev. W. H. Fremantle, the Rev. ¥. MM. Fuller, the Rev. Dr. Ginsburg, the Rev. Dr. Edersheim, the Rev. H. S. Holland, Mrs. Humphrey Wart, the kev. Professor Leathes, the Rev. Professor Milligan, of Aberdeen, the Rev. Dr. Plumptre, the Rev. J. Gregory Smith, the Rev. Professor Stewart, of Glasgow, the Rev. Fohn Wordsworth, of Brasenose College, Oxford, the Rev. H. B. Swete, of Caius College, Cambridge, the Kev. A. AZ. Mason, Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge, and others. Dictionary of Christian Antiquities. COMPRISING THE HISTORY, INSTITUTIONS, AND ANTIQUITIES OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH, FROM THE TIME OF THE APOSTLES TO THE AGE OF CHARLEMAGNE. By Various WRITERS. Edited by WM. SMITH, D.C.L., & Rev. Professor CHEETHAM, M.A. With Illustrations. Vol. II. (completing the work). Medium 8vo. The Moral Philosophy of Aristotle. TRANSLATIONS OF THE NICOMACHEAN ETHICS, AND OF THE PARAPHRASE OF ANDRONICUS, TOGETHER WITH PHILOSOPHICAL Essays, INTRODUCTIONS AND ANALYSES. Designed for the use of Students at the Universities, By WALTER M. HATCH, M.A., Late Fellow of New College, Oxford. 2vols. 8vo. MR. MURRAY'S LIST OF WORKS IN PREPARATION. 19 London; Past and Present. By the late PETER CUNNINGHAM, F-.S.A. Tn this work will be found much antiquarian, historical, and entertaining information, together with ample descriptions of all the streets and buildings of note now to be seen, as well as those no longer existing ; and every place endeared to Englishmen by Ziéerest- ing and Historical associations, including :— REMARKABLE OLD INNS, COFFEE | PLACES REFERRED TO BY OLD WRITERS. HOousEs, AND TAVERNS, WARDS OF LONDON. Town Houses OF THE OLD Nopsiity. | THE Crry CompaANIEs. PLACES OF PUBLIC ENTERTAINMENT. THE CLUBs. ANCIENT THEATRES, AND OLD LONDON | CHURCHES AND CATHEDRALS. SIGHTS. RESIDENCES OF MEMORABLE MEN. ANCIENT CROSSES, AND CITY GATES. STREETS REMARKABLE FOR SOME EVENT. THE HOSTELS OF CHURCH DIGNITARIES. BirnrH PLACES AND BURIAL PLACES OF PRIVILEGED PLACES FOR DEBTORS. EMINENT INDIVIDUALS. OLD LONDON PRISONs. &c., &c. Revised and Edited by JAMES THORNE, F.S.A., Author of the “‘ Handbook to the Environs of London.” New Edition. 8vo. New and Copious Dictionary of the English Language. FOR PRACTICAL REFERENCE, METHODICALLY ARRANGED, AND BASED UPON THE BEST PHILOLOGICAL AUTHORITIES, Medium 8vyo. A Glossary of Peculiar Anglo-Indian Colloquial Words and Phrases. ETYMOLOGICAL, HISTORICAL, AND GEOGRAPHICAL. By HENRY YULE, C.B., and ARTHUR BURNELL, Ph.D. 8vo. Handbook of Familiar Quotations from English Authors. Fourth Edition, revised and enlarged. Fcap. 8vo. 29 MR. MURRAY’S LIST OF WORKS IN PREPARATION. The Speaker's Commentary on the New Testament. EXPLANATORY AND CRITICAL, WITH A REVISION OF THE TRANSLATION. By BISHOPS and CLERGY of the ANGLICAN CHURCH. Edited by F. C. COOK, M.A., Canon of Exeter, Preacher at Lincoln’s Inn, and Chaplain in Ordinary to the Queen. To be completed in 4 Vols. Medium 8vo. Vol. |. 18s. (Published.) pee a INTRODUC- Wm. THomson, D.D., Archbishop of York. ST. MATTHEW and) H. LONGUEVILLE MANSEL, D.D., late Dean of St. Paul's, BT MEATERS -civcccncnsss and The EDITOR. SOR URE. 02 cekscesesveen W. Basi Jones, D.D., Bishop of St. David’s, Vol. Il. (Nearly Ready.) B. F. Westcott, D.D., Canon of Peterborough, and Regius ST. JOHN .............+.... | Professor of Divinity at Cambridge. PH ACIS esc ccsaevnceens W. Jacogson, D.D., Bishop of Chester. Vol. Ill. E. H. Girrorp, D.D., Hon. Canon of Worcester, Rector ROMANS i iciceve. sete se of Much Hadham, and Examining Chaplain to the Bishop of London. T. S. Evans, Canon of Durham, and Professor of Greek in Durham University. J. WartE, M.A., Vicar of Norham, Northumberland. GALATIANS............... J. S. Howson, D.D., Dean of Chester. PHILIPPIANS, EPHE- J. A. JEREMIE, D.D., late Dean of Lincoln. SIANS, COLOSSIANS, THESSALONIANS, Canon WEsTCcoTT, D.D. CORINTHIANS....... .... and PHILEMON ...... Won. ALEXANDER, D.D., Bishop of Derry and Raphoe. PASTORAL EPISTLES. JouN JAcKsoN, D.D., Bishop of London, HEBREWS. ...........0000 W. Kay, D.D. Vol. IV. EPISTLE of 8ST. JAMES Rosert Scott, D.D., Dean of Rochester. EPISTLES of 8ST. JOHN Wwm.-.ALEXANDER, D.D., Bishop of Derry and Raphoe. J. B. Licutroot, D.D., Canon of St. Paul’s, and Margaret ST, PETER & ST. JUDE Professor of Divinity at Cambridge. J. R. Lumby, B.D., Incumbent of St. Edward’s, Cambridge. Sn eee Wo. LEE, D.D., Archdeacon of Dublin. BRADBURY, AGNEW, & CO., PRINTERS, WHITEFRIARS. uo mt Lf i 44 . , Ae pha iru.’ ‘, i Agi * | hires? r bale ae : Bolla J "¥ i Ce a i | He Vite ye, ire > joa Pa : % aoe } As +e i j a 9! Hi , i j i} | - chats Sint, 2 saga bee se ~ i “ } i ive ~ : series , i me ' }