=< pie i > f) ALEX) : . 4 SSS SSSS5sS EE EROS AEN TEIN AS FERS ETAT NG HO Le APT” Pat ee (ea Nate tus : | Div. ‘Fishes. Car a a a RESOURCES OF THE SHA Bondon: C. J. CLAY anv SONS, CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS WAREHOUSE, AVE MARIA LANE. Glasgow: 263, ARGYLE STREET. DLeipsig: F. A. BROCKHAUS. few Work: THE MACMILLAN COMPANY. Bombay: HE. SEYMOUR HALE. *a0a1ds22U0.U,7 | ‘eOUSNPUl SIY Seyep puv ‘syOOy puUv sJoU S,URU SUINI Uezjo YOY dnoxd e jo eddy ou} ‘yaeyg ontg WY ia ee ee Vast ala: Pea yet ae oy be ¥ ae Nat. Mas a af s epee ‘ me i aa ae Car 6G . piv. Fishes “ a0) OURCES OF THE SEA : ay Re SHOWN IN THE SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENTS = TO TEST THE EFFECTS OF TRAWLING AND _ OF THE CLOSURE OF CERTAIN AREAS Pe. OFF THE SCOTTISH SHORES. BY " eee MINTOSH, M.D., LL.D., F.BS., zre., ieee -ROFESSOR OF NATURAL HISTORY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF “ ane ST ANDREWS, ue | a) OR OF THE MUSEUM AND OF THE GATTY MARINE LABORATORY. 7 ILLUSTRATED. LONDON: C.J. CLAY snp SONS, AVE MARIA LANE. 1899 Cambridge: PRINTED BY J. AND C, F. CLAY, AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS. DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF THOMAS LAYCOCK, M.D., eErc., _ PROFESSOR OF THE PRACTICE OF PHYSIC IN THE UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH, a AND PHYSICIAN TO THE QUEEN IN SCOTLAND, by A FAR-SEEING AND ACCOMPLISHED PHYSICIAN AND PSYCHOLOGIST, ALEXANDER MACDUFF, Esg., D . OF BONHARD, THE IDEAL OF A REFINED AND SAGACIOUS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, ND THE MANY VALUED FRIENDS IN THE COUNTY AND CITY OF PERTH, 1860—1883, BY THE AUTHOR. PREFACE. THE author has felt it an urgent duty, since the work for the Royal Commission under Lord Dalhousie, to watch the various experiments to test the effects of trawling and of the closure, the more especially as these had been originally sug- gested by himself. Judgment was withheld until all the necessary facts were available, and a sufficient margin of time had supervened for the thorough investigation and testing of the areas. Now, after the lapse of twelve years, and of fifteen since the original work was begun; after a study of all that had been done at home independently of these experi- ments, and in other maritime countries; after a prolonged investigation into the development and life-histories of the food-fishes; and after the general statistics of the fisheries had time to settle into a reliable condition, it has been deemed prudent to make a critical survey of the work, and to form conclusions on this important question. It was hoped that opportunities would have been afforded for repeating in 1898, on the same dates and, as far as possible, under the same circumstances, the experiments of 1884, but the authorities did not appear to see either the way or the importance of such an enterprise. The suggestion was made in no narrow spirit, indeed its acceptance would have entailed very serious responsibilities on the author. The great aim of the survey has been to search for truth in this complex subject, to weigh carefully every fact bearing on its solution, and to bring an unbiassed mind to the task. To the scientific investigator a conclusion favourable to the con- tinuance of restrictive measures would have been as welcome x PREFACE. as the reverse, provided his facts warranted it. Misinterpreta- tion or overstraining of the deductions in any case is equally distasteful, and would be equally shortlived. It is interesting that similar conclusions to those formed by the author were reached by Professor Huxley and others from a totally different stand-point, a fact which does not detract from the strength of the position. The opportunities for practical inquiries into every branch of the subject have been— during the fifteen years’ inquiry—greater than at any former period in this country. While pondering over all the facts, and fully conscious of the responsibility entailed, one relief has ever been present, and that is—perfect faith in the marvellous ways of Nature in — the ocean, ways which enable her to cope, in regard to the food-fishes, with all the wonderful advances in apparatus for capture, and with the steady increase of population. It was intended to have printed every table prepared during the ten years, but their number (108) was formidable, and hence only such as were essential for the appreciation of the facts have been given. In the preparation of these the author has been aided by a series of valued young friends, amongst whom the late Rev. R. Gillespie, M.A., the Rev. E. Teviotdale, Mr W. E. Collinge, Mr Alex Thom, Mr Thomas Cargill, Mr Frank M. Milne, and Mr A. F. Munro deserve special mention. The genial companionship of these gentlemen and their unwearied efforts were sources of sincere satisfaction. The heaviest share of the work fell to Mr Frank M. Milne, M.A. The author has also to acknowledge the aid received in regard to the woodcuts of fishes from Dr Murie, LL.D., and Messrs Cassell, Petter, Galpin and Co., and for photographs from A. Wallace Brown, a name—for fully fifteen years—both welcome and familiar to every worker at the Marine Laboratory. To his valued colleague in the University, Dr Masterman, he is indebted for the preparation of the Index. In recent times great advances, inaugurated by Prof. Baird, have been made in connection with the fisheries by the United States Fish-Commission, and carried on by a distinguished band of workers, amongst whom the names of Alex. Agassiz, PREFACE. Xl Whitman, Earle, Jordan, Tarleton Bean, Ryder, Brown-Goode, and others are conspicuous. Canada, under the vigorous hand of Sir Charles Tupper, made a new departure in its fisheries by the appointment of the able and experienced Prof. Prince. The labours of the French under Professors Marion and Pouchet, Dr Sauvage, M. Guitel, Dr Canu, P. Gourret, G. Roché, M. Odin, and others have largely added to our know- ledge; as likewise have those of Prof. Hensen, Prof. Mobius, Prof. Brandt, Dr Heincke, Dr Ehrenbaum and many others in Germany. Valuable work has been done in Denmark by Capt. Drechsel, A. V. Ljungman, and Dr Petersen, while the same may be said of Prof. Hoffmann and Dr Hoek in the Nether- lands. In Norway the labours of Prof. G. O. Sars are every- where known, followed recently by those of Dr Hjort, and in this country also the hatching of marine fishes under Capt. Dannevig has been very successful; while in Sweden the names of the Malms, father and son, and Lundberg are familiar. In Belgium Prof. van Beneden’s talents were invaluable—as his son’s are now—in the department, and in Italy those of Prof. Giglioli. Russia has also made great progress under Dr O. Grimm, Dr Borodine, Dr Kniepovitch, and others, and _ Spain under Lieut. R. Vela. Lastly Japan is making active efforts to master its fisheries under Prof. Kishinouye. In Australia and the Cape of Good Hope able workers are busy with the problems of the fisheries, for example, Prof. Haswell, Mr Lindsay Thompson, and lately Dr Saville Kent in ~ the former, and Dr J. D. Gilchrist in the latter. In our own country the earliest work was done at St Andrews, which has never lost touch with the subject; and the workers from which, e.g. Prof. E. Prince, W. L. Calderwood, K. W. L. Holt, Dr Scharff, Dr H. Wilson, Dr A. T. Masterman, W. E. Collinge, G. Sandeman, H. C. Williamson, J. R. Tosh, H. M. Kyle, and others have extended our knowledge of the subject in a noteworthy manner. The names of the late James Duncan Matthews and the late George Brook, on the staff of the Fishery Board for Scotland, again, will long be remembered for the excellence of their work in connection with the food- fishes. The Marine Biological Association at Plymouth has x1l PREFACE. also made important advances by means of the able researches of W. Heape, J. T. Cunningham, G. C. Bourne, W. Bateson, W. Garstang, E. J. Allen and others. Lastly, under the Rev. W. 58. Green and Prof. Haddon, an important survey, especially of the food-fishes in the deeper water, off the west coast of Ireland, was made by the St Andrews workers, Prof. E. Prince and KH. W. L. Holt. Prof. Herdman on the Lancashire coast has in recent years inaugurated modern methods in the fisheries with success, while Mr Meek at Cullercoats on the opposite shore has also made a commencement in the department. In the criticism of the work of the Fishery Board for Scotland and its methods in regard to closure, it must not be supposed that the author has other feelings than those of respect for that body, from whom in former days he received much courtesy. It is sufficient to mention the names of Sir Thomas Boyd and Mr P. Esslemont—the former distinguished by his wide experience, the latter by his remarkable adminis- trative powers, to indicate how ably the duty was done by each in the office of Chairman, with the support of such well-known members as Mr Maxtone Graham of Cultoquhey, Mr 8. Willam- son, Mr J. J. Grieve, Mr William Boyd, and Sir James Gibson Maitland of Howieton. The position and talents of the sheriffs, again, and their intimate acquaintance with fishery laws and administration, gave the Board both strength and _ prestige. The loss of the counsels of Sheriff Guthrie Smith, Sheriff Forbes Irvine, Sheriff Thoms and Sheriff Makechnie to the fisheries and the public cannot be over-estimated. To the energy and ability of the Board’s Superintendent of Scientific Investiga- tions (Dr T. W. Fulton) the author would also pay a ae tribute of commendation. Nothing, however, has been allowed to interfere with the faithful discharge, to the best of the author’s ability, of a public duty, and in relation to a question of such vital importance in the department. It is a source of regret that the popular statesman who was at the head of the Royal Commission (1883—85) has not lived to see the result of these experiments in which, from PREFACE. x11 their commencement in the beginning of January 1884, he took so deep an interest. Even to the last he kept himself acquainted with their progress, and though, when he died in 1887, the systematic work of the “Garland” had just begun, he saw how necessary it was to test thoroughly and check previous observations. Indeed, when in 1884 any decided view was expressed, he was wont to add the caution “ Remember others will follow, criticise and check every step taken.” Yet, perhaps, his acutely sensitive mind, not to allude to his well-known sympathy with the liners, whose hardy, daring ways aroused his respect, and to whose appeals he ever cordially responded, might have felt a shade of disappointment at a result so different from the oft repeated views and wide-spread opinions of the fishing-community and the public. Gatty MARINE LABORATORY, St ANDREWS. 15 November, 1898. CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTORY. General Review of the Resources of the Sea and the Influence of Man thereon CHAPTER II. Remarks on the Scientific mee to the Royal Commission on Trawling (1884) a. Effects of ete on Ge Tere cen : b. Effects of the hooks of the Liners on the same grounds ce. Effects of the Trawl on the Eggs of Fishes, on certain Ground- fishes, and on very young fishes on the bottom The Recommendations of the Royal Commission on Trawling (188385), and the methods adopted by the Fishery Board for Scotland in carrying them out : : . : : : Closure of Areas Changes in the Trawling- easels anil hor heparatue : Changes in the Line-boats and their Apparatus The present state of the Line and the Trawl Fisheries in relation = ie Fishing Grounds and the Fishes CHAPTER III. PAGE 27 36 46 50 54 54 59 72 74 INVESTIGATIONS IN St ANDREWS Bay, 1886—1896 (p. 103). CHAPTER IV. INVESTIGATIONS IN FRITH OF FORTH, 1886—1896 (p. 133). CHAPTER V. INVESTIGATIONS IN Moray FRITH, 1887—1897 (p. 185). CONTENTS. XV CHAPTER VI. INVESTIGATIONS IN FRITH OF CLYDE, 1888—1897 (p. 211). writ. TNT, CHAPTER VII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS (p. 218). TABLES. ST ANDREWS BAY. Hauls during the months of the first and second quinquennial periods, and number in colder and warmer months. Number of saleable fishes per month 1886—1895. Number of unsaleable fishes per month 1886—1895. Average per haul at each station; average at all stations &c. Totals of each species per year, 1886—1895, and average of the plaice, dab, haddock and gurnard. Saleable fishes in monthly lists (with sizes) 1886—1895. Immature and unsaleable fishes in monthly lists (with sizes) 1886—1895. FRITH OF FORTH. Hauls during the first and second quinquennial periods, and number in colder and warmer months. Average per haul at each station, totals—saleable and unsaleable, and averages. Average per haul, or total numbers, of saleable and unsaleable fishes of each species 1886—1895. Saleable fishes in monthly lists (with sizes) 1886—1895. Immature and unsaleable fishes in monthly lists (with sizes) 1886—1895. XV1 XIII. XIV. eV XVI. XVII. WV TE, XIX. XX. XXI. XXII. XXIII. OX: ONE XXVI. XXVII. XXVIII. XXIX. XXX, XXXI. XXXII. TABLES. MORAY FRITH. Saleable fishes off Coast of Caithness and Smith Bank, 1884. Unsaleable fishes off Coast of Caithness and Smith Bank, 1884. Saleable fishes outside Moray Frith, 1898. Immature (unsaleable) fishes outside Moray Frith, 1898. Saleable in monthly lists (with sizes), Stations I to VI, 1887—1897. Unsaleable (chiefly immature) fishes in monthly lists (with sizes), Stations I to VI, 1887—1897. Hauls during the months of the first period (five years) and second period (six years), and number in warmer and colder months, _ Stations I to VI. Average per haul at each station (I to VI), and average at all stations &e. Totals of each species per year 1887—1897, and average of the plaice, dab, haddock and gurnard, Stations I to VI. Saleable fishes in monthly lists (with sizes), Stations VII to XVI, 1893—1897. Unsaleable fishes in monthly lists (with sizes), Stations VII to XVI, 1893—1897. Hauls during the months of the quinquennial period 1893—1897, Stations VII to XVI. Average per haul at each Station, average at all Stations per year, &e., Stations VII to XVI. Totals of each species per year, and averages of certain fishes, Stations VII to XVI. FRITH OF CLYDE. Saleable fishes in monthly lists (with sizes), 1888—1890, 1895, 1896, 1897. Unsaleable (chiefly immature) fishes in monthly lists (with sizes), 1888—1890, 1895, 1896, 1897. Hauls during the months of the quinquennial period. Totals of each species per year and averages of certain species. Average per haul at each Station, totals, and average per haui at all Stations. Comparison of day- and night- hauls, 1896 and 1897. The Gatty Marine Laboratory, St Andrews, To face p. xiv] Wa eu iene CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTORY. General Review of the Resources of the Sea and the Influence of Man thereon. In this chapter is a general statement of facts which point to the conclusion that, with some exceptions, the fauna of the open sea, from its nature and environment, would appear, to a large extent, to be independent of man’s influence. | In examining the resources of the sea! we are confronted with very different problems from those which meet us in the consideration of the fresh waters and the land. Moreover, this peculiar divergence has a tendency to mislead those whose experiences have been accumulated in surroundings in which all the operations of nature and of man are readily observed and easily understood. It is but recently since we relied, for instance, on the know- ledge derived from the effects of the non-protection of land- animals as a guide in dealing with the sea-fishes. It satisfied some to urge that man’s influence had swept off the larger mammals from great areas, and at the present moment is rapidly diminishing the numbers of such forms as the right and other whales, the elephants, giraffes, elks, buffalos and bisons. Com- paratively recent legislation in our own country has year by 1 By the sea is meant the open ocean and the exposed shores, for enclosed seas, like the Mediterranean, are placed under different conditions as regards the fisheries. Consequently the effect of man’s interference in certain cases is distinguishable—were it only in the single feature of the size of marine fishes offered for consumption. M. R. 1 — i - ie INFLUENCE OF MAN ON MAMMALS, year rendered the hare rarer than it has ever been previously, indeed it has swept this graceful denizen of the fields, this delight of every lover of nature, as well as unrivalled nourish- ment for the sick, almost out of certain counties, and may lead to its almost total extinction; the wolf has disappeared, while the badger is scarce, and where, we may ask, would the red deer, the roe and the fox have been if a measure of protection had not been meted out to them? Man’s interference caused the extinction within a generation of the huge Rhytina (sea-cow), though it was more or less marine in habit, and in the present day the dugong and the manatee are diminishing and may follow their relative. Asa rule, it is not difficult for man to influence land-animals whether for abundance or scarcity. Yet even here, under favourable surroundings, certain forms, as the rabbit in Australia, the lemmings in Norway and Sweden, the rats and mice of our houses, prove more than a match for his most potent checks. In the vegetable world, again, it is an arduous and often fruitless task to extirpate many plants—even with man’s ingenuity and opportunities. Nature provides in the majority a vast number of seeds, far beyond what is required for the preservation of the species, indeed the older naturalists pointed to this as a wise provision for the support of animals. It is only when we come to the larger slow-growing kinds that the action of man is so destructive, and yet the number of seeds in the larger trees, as the pines, acacias and others, is very great, 30,000 for instance occurring in such as Mimosa Lebbec. Man’s easy access and abundant opportunities are, however, very different from the conditions existing in the ocean. Even in the domain of the air, which in its vastness excels that of the sea, the effects of man’s interference—secondary though it may be—1is often noteworthy, mainly because its denizens deposit their eggs or young on the surface of the land, and thus, though the adults may wing their way into the ether, and even feed therein, as in the case of the bats and swallows, the helpless young and eggs are within his reach. In the flightless birds the same rules apply as in the land-mammals, and how few of these now live! The moa, the great auk, and the dodo have gone, and the ostrich, emu, cassowary and kiwi ON BIRDS, INSECTS AND FRESH-WATER FISHES. 3 (Apteryx) will require protection to retain them. In a few instances, as in the penguins, remote haunts, active aquatic habits and great boldness have aided the species in warding off destruction and placed them in a different category. The agency of man quickly diminishes many of the larger birds of flight, and this notwithstanding legislative protection. Without the latter where would our wild swans, geese and ducks have been? where the capercaillie, black-cock, grouse, pheasant and partridge? The same lesson is learned when we contrast the former condition of the rook with the present one of modified protection. A few birds, as the sparrow, cushat and passenger- pigeon, appear to be exceptions under certain conditions; but these in the former case are due to the complications of civilized life itself, and in the latter often depend on immigration, and thus are seldom altogether beyond man’s influence. The air, however, differs from the land not only in its vast- ness, but in the fact that certain of its inhabitants, eg. the insects, seem to defy man’s power and ingenuity in limiting their numbers. Thus, is the house-fly less abundant now than in the days of the ancient Egyptians? Do the hordes of locusts, gnats, Hessian flies, mosquitoes, or other forms show marked diminution? Yet in all these instances the eggs are deposited on or near the surface of the earth and within man’s reach. Even where elaborate measures are taken to encompass the destruction of a noxious form, e.g. the vine-parasite, Phylloxera, on plants under man’s immediate care, how difficult is it, with all the resources of modern chemistry, to attain success. The same applies to the larger insects, such as wasps, the nests of which are easily reached. From age to age these denizens of the air have kept their ground against all the forces man could bring against them, and yet they would have required aérial eggs to have placed them on a similar footing to most of the food-fishes of our waters. The elaborate laws framed for the protection of the more valuable fishes of the fresh waters of our country are suffi- cient proofs of the care which is necessary for their protec- tion. Diminution of these is readily caused by the various 1—2 4 INFLUENCE OF MAN ON FAUNA OF THE OCEAN, nets and other instruments used by man for capture. But just as—even in large areas of fresh water—the stock of fishes may be reduced to small dimensions by over-fishing, so restoration by artificial measures can be effectively carried out. In both respects, therefore, fresh waters offer a contrast to the sea. When we come to the ocean the problems connected with man’s influence on certain of its denizens assume a much greater degree of complexity. In the first place, though the almost boundless space of the air far surpasses the sea, the latter greatly exceeds the land, since it occupies about three-fourths of the earth’s surface. Yet this gives but an imperfect com- parison, for, whereas it is chiefly on the surface of the earth that terrestrial animals are found, it is altogether different with the ocean, the inhabitants of which not only people the bottom, but glide over the latter, frequent mid-water and the surface, indeed, may be said to be scattered everywhere throughout its mass as well as fringe its margins. Moreover, while we can pursue the mammal on land, entrap the fish in the stream or lake, or follow the flight of the bird to a certain extent in the air, it 1s otherwise with the sea. Its ever-changing and often opaque and tempestuous waters offer a barrier to the pursuit of its larger forms, even were it possible to track them to its distant abysses, while the more minute for the most part escape observation. Thus with all the skill and perseverance of ages much yet remains to be accomplished in regard to our know- ledge of the sea and its inhabitants, both plant and animal. One feature, however, sufficiently distinguishes the sea from the air, viz. its being almost everywhere permeated by life—both plant and animal, and thus it affords a never-failing supply of food to its inhabitants, each of which finds in the surrounding water the nourishment best suited for it. The resources of the ocean, however, are limited in the case of the large air-breathing forms pursued by man, such as the right whale or “bow-head,” which has steadily decreased in numbers during the present century. The reckless slaughter of the young whales accompanying their dams, a sure method of capturing the unfortunate and solicitous mothers, has intensi- fied the effect of this eager chase by various nations for whale- ON WHALES AND SEALS. 5 bone and oil. Producing but a single young one at a birth, this huge and harmless mammal will probably disappear unless measures are taken for its preservation. The same may be said of the other whalebone whales which are pursued for profit, and of the dugong and manatee, the oil, skin and skeletons of which are of value. The huge Pacific grey whale (Rhachi- nectes glaucus) of the lagoons of the Californian coast has, indeed, been entirely destroyed by man. The effect of the slaughter of hundreds of the ca’ing whale (Globtocephalus melas) is not so clear, but the xiphoid whales captured in the north seas for their oil are in greater danger. In no species has the inability of recuperation from constant attacks been better illustrated than in the sperm-whale, the numbers of which have been seriously diminished within recent times. The effect of man’s keen pursuit is also well shown in the seals, which are now so scarce on many parts of our own shores. Only in the more remote regions (as in the sound of Harris) are they to be met with in considerable numbers. Yet here and there the absence of interference and the presence of a favourite food may occasionally lead to their appearance in larger numbers, as at the mouth of the Tay. Man's effective influence on them in their headquarters in the Arctic seas is unchallenged, since their breeding places are on land. These large air-breathing marine forms, therefore, occupy a special position, and make a contrast with the majority of the types we have now to consider. Of great importance in connection with the subsequent groups is the plenitude and variety of marine plants. Familiar forms of these are the green, red and olive weeds of the rocky shores and tidal pools, and the grass-wrack of the muddy flats. In certain places indeed the perennial growth of the olive weeds was formerly of at least as much importance to the inhabitants as their grain-crops. The immense Sargasso-sea off the Azores, and the smaller ones in the Atlantic, again, have long been a source of interest and wonder. Various naturalists further have noted the discoloration of the sea from the abundance of microscopic plants, have observed the occurrence of vast masses of diatoms in the south Pacific, and 6 PELAGIC PLANT-LIFE, as an ancient marine deposit on land; while others have secured many in the stomachs of ascidians. Though it is not so long since the intimate connection between this ubiquitous plant-life as food for the higher marine forms has been prominently demonstrated, yet it had not altogether been overlooked. The herbivorous cetaceans, as the manatees and dugongs were called, are well-known instances. From time immemorial dulce, Irish moss, many other alge, and edible swallows’ nests (an algoid substance), have been esteemed by man; and certain land-animals, as pigs, cattle and ponies, eat with avidity tangles or other olive sea-weeds. Even the microscopic plants of the ocean (viz. diatoms) in their innutritious condition as a deposit on land (mountain-flour) were formerly mixed with the pounded inner bark of the Scotch fir to satisfy the simple appetites of the Norse peasantry. The presence of the minuter forms of plant-lfe must have been familiar to fishermen and voyagers from early times, either as a coating on their nets, as causing discoloration of the sea, or stranded as a scum on the beach. The occurrence of diatoms and other minute forms has also been noted by scientific observers such as Sir Joseph Banks, Sir Joseph Hooker, Dr Gwyn Jeffreys and the various explorers of modern times, e.g. those on board the ‘Challenger,’ as well as the staff of the German Plankton Expedition. The great abundance of diatoms in the Arctic and still more in the Antarctic seas is well known, while in the depths of the Black Sea all else is stated to be absent but bacteria. Detailed examination of the pelagic life of St Andrews Bay and the offshore waters of the east coast for many years showed the vast abundance and variety of minute plants at all seasons, from January to December’. Their occurrence in the stomachs of many invertebrates and even in some fishes further indicated the important part played by them. The presence of such as Rhizosolenia not only coloured the sea, but coated nets with an odoriferous layer. The intimate connection between. the two great kingdoms was clearly pointed out as follows :— It is a remarkable fact that it is primarily to plants in inshore 1 [7th Ann. Report, S. F. B., 1889, pp. 259—310, 4 Plates. PELAGIC PLANTS AND FORAMINIFERA. t waters that the abundance and variety of animals are in many respects due, especially if estuaries also debouch in the neigh- bourhood. Thus nowhere are the swarms of Sagittz, Appen- dicularians, Crustaceans, and other groups of fish-food more conspicuous than in the midst of a sea teeming with diatoms, Rhizosoleniz and other algoid structures.’...... ‘Now this plant- life is specially rich in April and May, just when the larval and very young post-larval fishes appear more abundantly in the inshore waters, so that the cycle is nearly complete, viz., from the inorganic medium—through microscopical plant and larval crustacean—to the post-larval fish’. Similar views have been broached by Prof. Hensen of the German Expeditions and Dr George Murray of the British Museum; while Prof. Cleve, of Upsala, is of opinion that even the origin of the coastal currents in certain cases may be traced by their diatoms” Besides, both adult and adolescent marine fishes such as sand-eels devour the green and greyish-green alge of the Kden, even to the distention of their stomachs in May. Alge, again, are not uncommon accompaniments of food in other fishes. Broadly speaking, therefore, the sea has within its area a vast and ever-present source of nourishment for its teeming animals—a source altogether independent of the increment from fixed marine vegetation on shore or swept into it by rivers. This supply can in no way be affected by the action of man, who is as powerless to modify it as to modify the tides. So long as it remains, one of the most important factors for the safety of the food-fishes is secured. In the ocean are immense numbers of Foraminifera and Radiolarians upon which the lower invertebrates prey both at the surface and the bottom. They in turn feed on diatoms and other simple plants and animals, and thus aid in completing the cycle from plant to fish. The records of the rocks show that many of both groups were as prevalent in the ancient seas 1 Lecture, Royal Instit. of Great Britain, Friday, February 1, 1889, p. 10. * Dr Petersen, of the Danish Zoological Station, has just issued an interest- ing addition to our knowledge of this subject—from observations in the Limfjord. 8 MAN’S INFLUENCE ON LOWER FORMS—SPONGES ; as in the modern. In the warmer areas, again, the water teems with the minute phosphorescent Woctiluca. The Cilioflagellates, such as Peridinium and Ceratium, occur in great abundance throughout the year. In the warmer months these and the pelagic Infusoria (e.g. Tintinnus) are especially conspicuous at the surface. Their multiplication and that of other free and parasitic Infusorians—upon which many simple forms and even fishes feed—is beyond the sphere of human influence. : Amongst the lower invertebrates we meet with a group which in itself has been the source of a special fishery, viz. the sponges. From time immemorial the Levant and for a less period the Bahamas and Florida have furnished large supplies. Moreover, comparatively little care has been taken to propagate them by artificial means, and yet so nicely do all the surround- ings fit them to continue the race that, after all these years, no sign of extinction is apparent. The fragments left on the rocks or stones as well as the pelagic larvee which represent them in the water around have sufficed to fill up the gaps caused by the sponge-fishermen. The non-commercial kinds of sponge, on the other hand, are free from special pursuit, being only captured by trawls and hooks to be again returned to the sea. The lacerated fragments or their contained eggs and larve enable each species to keep up its numbers in all our seas. Storms, moreover, toss many on the beach, but neither the one loss nor the other affects their abundance. Nature persistently carries out her measures of economy from age to age, and no more conspicuous example of this exists than the wide-spread disintegration of limestone rocks and the densest shells by the ceaseless borings of a sponge (Cliona). In no group are the resources of the sea in regard to re- cuperation more prominently exhibited than in the hydroid zoophytes, jelly-fishes, anemones and corals. The hardihood of the common freshwater Hydra, so graphically told by Abraham Trembley, the old naturalist of Geneva, is characteristic of the majority of the race. The immense profusion of such zoophytes as Obelva in inshore waters and the rapidity of their growth ON ZOOPHYTES AND JELLY-FISHES. 9 show the ever ready resources of nature in restoring losses and spreading useful forms on every suitable site. Though it were possible in a given area to remove every vestige of such a form from the sea-bottom, a single summer tide would carry a sufficiency of little ripe jelly-fishes (Hydromedusce) to repeople it. ‘The countless swarms of these graceful and beautiful glassy creatures, which stretch for miles round our shores and far beyond into the open ocean, is one of the most striking features in marine life. From the eggs of these swimming jelly-fishes larve arise which by-and-by settle on rocks, stones, salmon stake-nets and other zoophytes, indeed, upon everything that affords a suitable hold, and rapidly grow into the plant-like original with which the cycle commenced. In their pelagic condition they are for the most part unaffected by any mode of fishing, though they are often beached in multitudes by the tide. Nature herself in another instance ordains an annual check to growth on the mussels of the Eden, for the dense and graceful tufts—heavily laden with young mussels—are swept off in October. But before this happens the spore-sacs of the -zoophyte (Gonothyrea) have given rise to multitudes of pelagic young which ere long renew the feathery coating on the mussels. Some of this group, again, such as Corymorpha, live immersed in sand, and are difficult to dislodge, even when specially sought after by trawl, dredge or net. Thus a large species obtained in considerable numbers on the ground-rope and trawl of the ‘Medusa’ in 1884 in St Andrews Bay has never been procured since, notwithstanding various efforts. Yet the free-swimming jelly-fishes it apparently throws off are common at certain seasons, showing that the parent-stock still remains. A rare plant (eg. Asplenvwm septentrionale of Stenton Crag) can readily be extirpated by the hand of man, but it is otherwise with the denizens of the sea. It is not easy, indeed, to check the growth of such marine animals, amidst which other types lurk and feed, in turn to become sustenance for the food-fishes, which occasionally, as in the young cod, browse directly on certain zoophytes. Even the gigantic whales engulph many of the little jelly-fishes mingled with other forms on their feeding grounds in the Arctic Ocean. 10 FALLACIES AS TO MAKING OCEAN BARREN. In this connection the notion which places on the trawl the onus of removing the food of the fishes by rendering the bottom “barren” may briefly be alluded to. Where, when, and how this barrenness has been found is not stated, but its results are said to be as disastrous to the fishes as the destruction of the grass in an enemy’s country would be to the flocks and herds. Such writers appear to be unaware of the vast abundance and variety of pelagic beings—from fishes to plants—which own relationship neither to the bottom nor to the locality, but are swept hither and thither to nourish, with cosmopolitan lber- ality, the fishes of our own and the neighbouring shores. They have overlooked the wealth of life in the sand and mud, which no trawl can seriously disturb. No barren area of this nature in the open sea is known to us, and a consideration of the forces of nature in the sea would show that its barrenness if not wholly hypothetical would be short-lived. A trawl that would simultaneously remove the contents of the water from surface to bottom, sweep the loose forms on the latter as well as those deeply immersed in it——has yet to be invented. To return from this digression, we observe in other mem- bers of the sub-kingdom the same remarkable recuperation and persistence. Though along a limited line of beach the larger anemones, a valued bait for cod, may be removed by the fishermen almost entirely from the tidal rocks, yet the same species flourishes in the neighbouring and deeper waters, and sooner or later the blanks are obliterated. The other large forms in deep water are in no danger, and even crushing under foot on the deck of a ship does not always destroy them, for each piece becomes an independent animal. It is stated that in one of the West Indian Islands a proprietor, wishing to extirpate a colony of gorgeous anemones’ which attracted 1 By the kindness of Mr J. EH. Duerden, Curator of the Museum of the Institute of Jamaica, I am able to identify this form with Condylactis passiflora, Duch. and Mich., a gorgeously coloured anemone. Its column, incapable of retraction, is bright scarlet or orange, either diffuse or in granulations, while distally it is brownish red. The long adhesive and somewhat thick tentacles, which wave gracefully, are also incapable of complete retraction, and are dark brown with minute white granulations, while the tips are bright purple or greenish-yellow, or in partial collapse rich iridescent green. INFLUENCE ON ANEMONES AND CORALS. 11 visitors and so affected the amenity of his grounds, had the holes in the rocks from which they protruded bored by an auger, yet by-and-by recuperation followed, and they expanded their beautiful discs as before. The anemones which dwell in sand, such as Peachia and Edwardsia, though occasionally extending in the Channel Islands to the tidal regions, are as a rule beyond the reach of man. Yet the cod pursues the former, it may be after dis- lodgment by storms, while the stomachs of dabs and flounders are often distended by the latter. Even were it granted that every one of these anemones were swept off an area by storms or by dredges (for trawls do not appear to affect them) nature is not unprepared, for their minute pelagic young are carried everywhere by currents, and even occasionally borne as it were on a graceful carriage by the minute jelly-fishes, to the discs of which they adhere by their tentacles. They then settle on a suitable site and repeople an old area or extend the dis- tribution of the species on a new. Such forms have thus a double protection—firstly by a life in the sand, and, secondly, -by a free-swimming larval condition. The wonderful extension, slow but sure, of coral reefs in tropical regions is another instance of the vast resources of nature—in the development of which man is powerless either to check or modify. The multitudes of free-swimming larva of such stocks—far above the needs of coral extension—must form, moreover, an important element in the food-supplies of the ocean in the neighbourhood, whilst some holothurians (sea-cucumbers) and fishes (Scarus) feed directly on the coral itself. In our own waters the dead men’s fingers (Alcyoniwm) and sea-pens (Pennatula and Funiculina) maintain their ground against hook and trawl just as the red coral of commerce does in the Mediterranean and elsewhere. The capture of marine products for food or for commerce has in some cases been carried on for centuries before science stepped in to ascertain their nature, map out their life-histories, and indicate the true course for legislative interference. The fishery for the red or the precious coral of commerce in this 12 MAN’S INFLUENCE ON CORALS, respect agrees with that for the food-fishes. Both had been carried on for centuries before they attracted the earnest attention of the scientific, and both are examples of the long-continued prevalence of error, and, in the case of fishes, even culpable. lack of knowledge about a food-supply so important. Indeed, the application of science to the problem of the food-fishes is of much more recent date than that to the coral of commerce, just as if personal adornment, and not practical utility, were of primary importance in the world! Contrasted with some oceanic forms the red coral is not only represented by limited numbers, comparatively slow growth and moderate powers of increase, but the area of distribution is circumscribed. Moreover, fixed to rocks, stones, shells and dead pieces of coral at the bottom of the sea, it could neither escape the engines of capture, nor, by a pelagic habit, aid in the spread of its larvee over a wide area. Yet, though hundreds of boats’ crews (Corallint) annually sweep the ground with heavy bars of wood weighted with stones and fringed with hempen tangles, this valuable treasure of the sea has by no means been extirpated on the very sites where the ancestors of the modern fishermen followed the same pursuit. The pelagic larvee—perhaps only escaping as the parent-stock is drawn to the surface—plant the species on the same or new areas and defeat man’s efforts to destroy it. Cydippe swimming downwards after engulphing a larval crab (Zoéa). ON STARFISHES AND ANNELIDS. 13 The whole sub-kingdom of the Ccelenterates, therefore, 18 conspicuous in the pelagic wealth of the sea in every clime, and is a vast and never-failing supply of food to many higher forms, while they (i.e. the Celenterates) in turn occasionally levy a tax on animals as high in the scale as fishes. For hundreds of years fishermen of various kinds have waged a war of extermination against the common cross-fish or starfish, a form which lives on the bottom, but, like many other marine animals, has free-swimming larve (bipinnarians and brachiolarians) which occur in countless swarms during the warm months. Notwithstanding the constant slaughter by liners, mussel-, clam- and oyster-fishermen this species does not seem to be less abundant than it was centuries ago, or within the memory of the oldest inhabitant. While man’s pursuit is not stimulated by the value of the starfish in the market or its use as food, yet the injuries it inflicts on the liner by removing his bait, or rendering the fishes unsightly when hooked, and its ravages on oyster-, clam- and mussel-beds suffice to render the annual destruction by man noteworthy, without taking into consideration the loss by storms or by other starfishes (Solaster). Though limited areas in shallow water or the tidal regions may be more or less freed from their attacks by constant care, yet taken broadly man has little effect either on their general increase or diminution. Their enormous numbers on certain fishing grounds, on which under favourable circumstances they may be seen closely covering hundreds of square yards of the bottom, besides spreading into deeper waters where they are less visible, is sufficient proof that to-day they are no less numerous than formerly. The old plan of tearing them across the body before returning them to the water only helped to increase their numbers, for each portion of the disc was re- generated and became a complete five-rayed starfish. The expensive measure of collecting them by hand or by other means on oyster- and mussel-beds and placing them on land to dry in the sun is only partially successful, since gulls often carry them back to sea before life is extinct. The destructive agencies of man have not affected the other members of the starfish-group (Echinoderms) to any appreciable 14 MAN’S INFLUENCE ON ANNELIDS AND CRABS. degree. Thus the Béche de mer (Trepang) fishery of Australia and the South Sea Islands seems to show no sign of exhaustion —notwithstanding the eager search for these holothurians as a favourite article of diet for the Chinese. Doubtless the pelagic larvae, like those of the brittle-stars and sea-urchins, enable them to survive. Indeed it would appear that the echinoderms in which the larve are reptant (and not pelagic) are fewer in numbers than those provided with free-swimming young. The group as a whole is important and furnishes food for many invertebrates, fishes and gulls. Amongst the annelids there are a few forms which have been persistently sought from early times by man for bait, e.g. the lobworm (Arenicola marina). On limited areas of sand or muddy sand numerous fishermen have almost daily plied their spades, and while, perhaps, the examples may not be so abundant as at first, there is, as a rule, no lack of them on most beaches. The lobworm, indeed, is an instance of a marine form—placed within easy reach of the instruments of capture— which has resisted the attacks of man, probably because a sufficient stock of ripe examples and the very young are covered at all times by the tide. The Palolo of Samoa and Tonga, so much esteemed as food by the natives, and captured in itsseason with the utmost keenness, is still as abundant as in former generations. This annelid lives amongst the coral reefs of these islands, becomes pelagic for the sake of discharging its egos into the surrounding water, and is then captured in great quantities for food. Man has persistently taken as many of each species as he could, yet both maintain their abundance. The enormous numbers of pelagic larval annelids, in suc- cessive swarms, which throng the sea throughout the greater part of the year, together with such adults as Tomopteris and the Chetognath, Sagitta, show in this group alone a great perennial source of nourishment. The demersal adults are everywhere a favourite food of fishes, which find them where man cannot. In no class is the boundless wealth of the sea in all latitudes more conspicuous than in the crustaceans or crabs. It is necessary, however, to consider them in two groups, viz., ON CRABS OF VARIOUS KINDS. 15 the smaller and for the most part pelagic forms, which are not sought by man for food, and the larger, amongst which are the edible kinds. Every ocean and bay, from the Arctic to the Antarctic region, teems with minute crustaceans, chiefly copepods, which at various stages of growth form the food of the younger fishes. It must not be supposed that their small size is a barrier to their being preyed on by the most gigantic inhabitants of the sea, since they form a large pro- portion of the food of the right whale. In their larval stages (Nauplii) they are fitted for the needs of the youngest fishes, such as the cod and the turbot, just after the absorp- tion of the yolk, and they are important links in the cycle of marine life culminating in the fishes. Their ranks are largely augmented by the larval stages of the sea-acorns (Balant), which swarm in the inshore waters during the spring months, and afterwards settle in dense multitudes to form calcareous crusts on rocks, boats, stakes and stones in the sea. The copepods occur during every month of the year, and have been found by Dr George Murray and our- selves to feed on diatoms, so that the links from plant to fishes receive another illustration. These and the crowds of the sessile-eyed crustaceans (such as Parathemisto in mid-winter) provide an inexhaustible supply of food over which human agency has no influence. Man in a minor way and with great difficulty may protect his boats and ships, the piles of harbours and other places of easy access, from the ravages of the “oribble” (a minute crustacean called Limnoria), but he is helpless in the case of floating or submerged timber. Nature almost invariably carries out her own laws, and, as a rule, in the sea these are beyond man’s influence. Another group of crustaceans, viz., the Schizopods, are of importance in most seas, even to a great depth, from their vast abundance at certain seasons, and from their forming a favourite food of valuable fishes such as the herring. For instance in autumn the water near Crail, at the mouth of the Forth, is occasionally crowded with Thysanoéssa either alone or accompanied by Boreophausia and Nyctiphanes—all shrimp-like species of some size, and they may be stranded 16 MAN'S INFLUENCE ON HIGHER CRUSTACEANS, on the beach in such numbers that it appears to be strewn with long stripes of chaff. Only in the Channel Islands, as at Jersey, are the members of this group (Myside) captured by fine nets in masses by men in boats, to be utilized as ground-bait in rod-fishing for mullets’. Besides these swimming (pelagic) forms the higher crusta- ceans inhabiting the bottom, such as the shrimps, prawns, edible and shore-crabs, the hermit-crabs and lobsters, continually send up a series of larvee to join the free-swimming multitudes, and at a later and larger stage they again pass to the bottom, thus giving the fishes a double opportunity, the smaller seizing them on their upward journey and in their pelagic stage, the older and larger as they descend?. The circulation of such larval and post-larval crustaceans in the ocean is thus an important factor in the food of other marine animals. With regard to the edible crustaceans it cannot be said that man has yet made a notable reduction on the shrimps and prawns so largely captured on many of our shores for food. Where they formerly occurred in great numbers they still prevail; where they are fewer, and where no diminution has been caused by man, they remain as before, without any apparent increase. It is otherwise with the large slow-growing lobsters and edible crabs, the numbers of the former, especially im our own country and on the shores of Canada, having shown signs of diminution during recent years, from the exertions made to capture them for food. The lobster in its adult con- dition is chiefly an inshore form, and thus is easily reached by the instruments for capture ; while its slowly developing eggs, attached to the abdomen of the female nearly a year, encounter many risks, irrespective of the capture of the adult. It is a species, in short, which readily yields to adverse forces, though at the same time there is no sign of extinction. Its chief safe- guard is the pelagic stage of its larva, but as the adults are for the most part imshore forms, and the free-swimming stage 1 J. Hornell, Jour. Marine Zool. and Micros., 11. 1897, p. 90. 2 Vide Trawling Report, 1884, p. 370. ON POLYZOA AND SHELL-FISHES, 17 brief, its circumstances are different from those, for instance, of a fish with pelagic eggs. In this group, therefore, we see that, while the more minute and lower forms are beyond the interference of man, certain of the larger and higher species can be notably diminished. So far as can be ascertained, however, the species found on the bottom of the open sea are as abundant as in former ages, and constitute an important element in the nourishment of the ground-feeding fishes, such as the cod. The wealth of oceanic life receives a considerable increment from the Polyzoa, which are either tufted plant-like forms or calcareous crusts on stones and sea-weeds. The group, how- ever, is not a conspicuous one in the pelagic fauna, though the larvee certainly occur in abundance, and for many months of the year. The sea-mats (Flustrw) are especially plentiful on some fishing-grounds, and, besides the larvae which increase the pelagic life, the arborescent tufts give shelter to other forms on which fishes feed. In the offshore as well as the inshore areas, in shallows and in very great depths, at the surface, in mid-water and on the bottom, the group of the shell-fishes is everywhere disseminated. The vast resources of the sea in this respect cannot be over- estimated. For the present purpose the class may be divided into two groups, viz., (1) the pelagic, and (2) those frequenting the bottom. The pteropods, heteropods, and the pelagic stages of demersal forms—both univalve and bivalve—are universally distributed from the Arctic to the Antarctic seas. Thus Clione and Limacina form conspicuous elements of the pelagic food of the right whale in the Arctic seas, while the tropical and sub-tropical pteropods are even more numerous. That these and their allies are a favourite food of fishes is well known, though it is less generally understood that even ducks feed on them in the surface-water. Mixed with the purely pelagic mollusks are immense numbers of the larval stages (veligers) of bivalves and univalves, besides sea-slugs and their allies, and they are found during every month of the year, most numerously in spring and summer. The neighbourhood of a M, R. 9 18 MAN’S INFLUENCE ON SHELL-FISHES. mussel-bed, for instance, has a marked influence on the abund- ance of the pelagic larval mussels, just as the vicinity of a bed of oysters or of clams produces similar effects. In fine weather many of these molluscan larve, rising from the bottom, sport at the surface, while by-and-by as they get older they leave the upper regions of the water to descend either to bore in the sand or other medium or take up their habitat on the bottom. The fishes thus, as in the case of the crustaceans, have a double opportunity—first on their rising and again on their descent. The pelagic mollusks, from their enormous numbers and wide distribution, would alone support a great oceanic fauna of predatory animals, and, as they live on microscopic plants and similar minute food, they likewise illustrate the close connection between the two kingdoms. Moreover as food for young fishes they not only give abundance, but afford the necessary variety in dietary. For ages man has gathered the sedentary and creeping shell-fishes, such as mussels, cockles, and whelks, for food and bait, often without the slightest restriction, as in the case of the whelk and limpet, yet extinction has not ensued, not even in the much abused mussel, which has suffered on the one hand from reckless fishing and on the other from the very varied sup- positions of fishermen, mussel-merchants, and politicians. Some years ago an agitation was raised about mussels. Pamphlets and the newspapers of the day kept attention directed to the urgent need for mussel-reform in view of the decrease of the supply. A Committee under Lord Tweedmouth (then Mr Marjoribanks) was appointed by Parliament to investigate the subject. The committee made important recommendations, giving the Fishery Board powers to regulate the various mussel-beds and prevent waste. Very little change, however, has ensued in regard to the distribution or increase of the mussel, and it may be supposed that the agitation in some cases was not disinterested. At any rate, the supply of mussels at this moment is sufficient. The most elementary administration and the bed-system enable this species to maintain its ground. That a populous centre should send companies of cockle-gatherers almost daily to a sandy flat and this for hundreds of years—without exhausting the ON SHELL-FISHES AND CUTTLEFISHES. 19 supply—is evidence that the ways of nature are full of purpose though they may not always be understood. Man’s influence over the preceding mollusks is limited to the inshore, and especially the tidal mussel, cockle, clam, and oyster-beds, to the periwinkle, limpet, and ear-shell between tide-marks, and there it ceases. Even were he to destroy every mussel, cockle, clam, and oyster-bed within his reach, the gaps would be filled up by forms (including those mentioned) beyond his power, and the wealth of molluscan life maintained to succeeding generations. The operations of nature elsewhere are on too vast a scale for his interference. By a single storm she teaches him the inefficiency of dredge, trawl and net, and strews the beach with myriads of shell-fishes of every size, few or none of which are ever disturbed by his operations,Xand which prove a valuable harvest of bait to the fishermen, and _ perhaps bring many a predatory food-fish inshore in search of the easily captured spoil. More powerful than the “gribble,” the boring shell-fishes (Xylophaga and Teredo) tunnel their way in submerged timber of all kinds and rapidly disintegrate the masses of wood borne to the sea by great rivers. Man can neither arrest their ravages in unprotected wood throughout the ocean, nor utilize their labours as he desires. From early times, again, cuttlefishes have been used as food by man, and still more extensively by the larger fishes, such as the bonito, as well as by the whales. No delicacy was valued more highly amongst the ancients on the eastern shores of the Mediterranean than these mollusks. In modern times they have been eagerly sought for bait and so highly prized that as many as possible are captured for this purpose, both on our own and other shores. Some whales, such as the Sperm-whale (Fig. p. 20), live to a large extent on them, so that when this Species was more common than it 1s now the annual consump- tion must have been great’. The majority of the cuttlefishes are, however, pelagic in their adult state, and the young of 1 It has happened that a sum of £5 or even £10 has been given for a single box of cuttlefishes as bait. The cost of a year’s consumption in the case of this whale must be enormous. 2—2 20 MAN’S INFLUENCE ON CUTTLEFISHES, almost all are so, and thus they have the protection of a vast area, besides the provision of the inky secretion. n, nasal passage; b, nostril or blow-hole. Outline and skeleton of Sperm-whale, which lives largely on cuttlefishes; s, region of spermaceti ; OK RT I AATONO) iG | Lael ey v3 ON ASCIDIANS AND FOOD-FISHES. ZT It would appear, therefore, that for ages the inhabitants of the sea have largely used the cuttlefishes as food, and to some extent man, both as food and bait, yet these active and generally pelagic forms have not been extirpated. The com- mon species seem to be as abundant as formerly, though their appearance is at all times uncertain. They occur, like so many oceanic forms, suddenly in great numbers on certain grounds, destroying the fishes on the hooks and boldly rising to the surface after their prey as it is drawn up by the fishermen. They also occasionally seriously interfere with the success of the herring fishing (as in 1897) by appearing in great numbers —to the injury of both fishes and nets. In the deeper waters of the Pacific as well as in the other great seas they are abundant, notwithstanding the constant warfare of whales and fishes. This is probably due, as already indicated, as much to the vastness of the area of their distribution, the depths which they frequent, and the provision of the inky cloud, as to the protection of the eggs in tough capsules, by a shell or by enveloping mucus, and the pelagic young. A few, again, have Hoating eggs, and thus the means for their increase are both varied and extensive as well as beyond the influence of man. The group of the Urochordates offers few points for remark —except that there is no sign of exhaustion in the common forms within tide-marks and beyond it. The enormous num- bers of the pelagic appendicularians and their gelatinous houses is one of the features of the ocean, which in certain places is discoloured by them. Moreover, they feed on microscopic plants, while the smaller fishes and other forms prey on them. The cycle between oceanic plants and fishes has therefore more than one illustration. In this and allied groups the larval form is often more conspicuous than the adult, thus the larva of Phoronis abounds in St Andrews Bay from July to September, yet the adult has never been found within it. We now come to the consideration of by far the most im- portant group in relation to man, viz., the food-fishes of the sea. These comprise the ordinary round fishes, such as the cod and the herring, the various kinds of flat fishes, the skate (belonging to the cartilaginous fishes), and a few others. For ages these 22 MAN’S INFLUENCE ON FOOD-FISHES. have been eagerly followed by generation after generation of men belonging to every nation bordering on the sea. Yet after all these thousands of years can it be said that there are evident signs of the extinction of any modern marine fish ? It has been shown how easy it is to affect the numbers of the larger land-animals, the oceanic mammals and fresh-water fishes, by extensive and long-continued attacks. The problem of the marine food-fishes, however, is less easily solved. The majority of these produce a vast number of minute pelagic egos, and thus even before the larve are born the species 1s disseminated throughout a great area, it may be, so far as fishing is concerned, of untouched ocean’. There is no definite limit, for instance, on either side of the Atlantic beyond which we can say this or that fish does not go. On the contrary, a vast reserve of water more or less unfished by man is always present in the larger seas, and as these are but parts of one great whole which covers three-fourths of the earth’s surface, the extermination of any form by man is rendered difficult,— nearly as difficult as if nature had provided insects with aérial eggs, and man had endeavoured to annihilate them. At first sight 1t seems almost incredible that such species as the cod, haddock, whiting, plaice, and sole could withstand the vast annual drain caused by the operations of the fishermen of various nations. Yet at this moment all these species in the open seas present as wide a distribution, and, in some, as little diminution in numbers as if the constant persecution of man had not been. Nor must we confine our attention to the ravages of man alone. Whales, seals, sea-birds?, sharks, dog- fishes, skate, their own and other species of bony fishes, and in their young stages many invertebrates, continually prey on them and have preyed on them for ages. } The yearly consump- tion by the foregoing diverse forms represents an enormous sacrifice of the food-fishes. These and other natural checks are beyond the influence of man, and probably at no period were less powerful than they are now. Man’s interference is 1 Sir J. Murray thinks cooling of the surface destroyed forms having pelagic larve, but his grounds are open to doubt. 2 H.g. penguins, gannets, cormorants, guillemots, puffins, gulls, terns, &c. ON FOOD-FISHES. 23 chiefly confined to a belt within a reasonable distance of land, and to which a constant immigration—active or passive—takes place from more distant waters. It is true that the larger examples of the common species of food-fishes become fewer by persistent fishing, but it cannot be said that, in the case of either round or flat fishes in the majority of the areas, signs of extinction are apparent. ‘The resources of nature, as in most of the invertebrates, would appear to be sufficient for recupera- tion. The round fishes are a wandering race, moving hither and thither in search of food or for other reasons, and thus their abundance or scarcity, as tested by hook, net, and trawl, is subject to remarkable variations of greater or less duration. The flat fishes, again, by their submersion in the sand, by their activity and by their nomad life in the earlier stages have considerable aids in their preservation. It is probable, however, that it is mainly to the vast number of eggs produced by each species, to their transparency and pelagic nature, and to the existence of boundless reserve-margins of the sea that the food-fishes have been enabled to resist extine- tion by natural agencies and by the various methods of fishing suggested by the ingenuity of man’. Yet the hordes of dog- fishes and the abundance of skate are kept up by forms which have a very few large eggs of slow development, protected either in the body of the parent or in a tough horny capsule. The young fish enters life, therefore, at an advanced stage, and escapes the dangers of minute size and great delicacy. On the other hand, the vast numbers of the herrings spring from eggs fixed in masses to various structures on the bottom. That the young stages of the cod should seek the tidal margins of the rocks, whereas the young stages of the haddock should keep to deep water, and that the habit in each case should conduce to the prevalence of the species, is another instance of the marvellous prescience of nature. Even if, in the waters within a reasonable distance of land, fishing were carried to such a degree that it would be no longer profitable to pursue it, it is possible that the adjoining 1 Enforced close-times, by storms, and in certain parts by ice have also to be considered. 24, MAN’S INFLUENCE ON FOOD-FISHES. areas and the wonderful powers of increase of the few fishes remaining would by-and-by people the waters as before, because everything in the sea around, including the plenitude of food, so nicely fitted for every stage of growth, would conduce to this end. To those who are annually familiar with square miles of sea (unknown as a spawning-ground) carpeted with myriads of tiny young herrings like fragments of thread, the not uncommon cry of “ruin of the fisheries” seems to need qualification. When, further, in areas supposed to be exhausted, Sand-eel, a favourite food of fishes both in its adult and young states. many adult food-fishes are found, whilst the water teems with myriads of pelagic sand-eels’, flat fishes and other forms, the same necessity for caution holds. In this group, therefore, as in the majority of the inverte- brates, it is apparently beyond man’s control either to reduce to vanishing point or greatly to increase the yield of the open sea. The larger forms of such species as the halibut, for instance, may be thinned by constant attacks, but the race continues as before with a resilience and pertinacity none the less sure that they are often doubted and may even be denied. It is a satisfactory proof of the powers of recuperation inherent in the ocean that for ages the British seas, for example, have withstood the almost daily tax of fishermen from both sides of 1 The richest food of almost all fishes. ON FOOD-FISHES. 25 the Channel, and the incursions of the eastern boats on the west, in addition to the local population. The wonder, perhaps, is lessened when we consider that for five or six hundred years at least the limited area of the estuary of the Thames has been persistently fished for shrimps by man, and that his nets have simultaneously killed the young soles, plaice and dabs throughout this long period without, up to this date, affecting in any marked manner the prevalence of either crustaceans or fishes. The independence of nature in the sea and man’s helplessness are further shown in connection with the swarms of dog-fishes that occasionally occur in the north- west and in the south, and which ruin his captured fishes and nets. Step by step we have thus briefly passed under review the whole series—from minute floating plants and invertebrates to fishes, and find that they constitute a complex cycle, linked together in intricate bonds, indissoluble by any agency man can devise. Hven in the most insignificant group, the opera- tions of nature are on a scale which forbids the possibility of human intervention. Only in certain species exposed by the tide or which frequent shallow water and are easily operated on by man’s agency, or are under special conditions in deep water, has the etfect been evident. All the rest on a free sea-board appear to resist attempts to reduce to vanishing point or to increase, some becoming for the moment rare or altogether absent, and, just as their doom has been pronounced, reappear- ing in countless multitudes on the same sites. The survey of the sea and its inhabitants, therefore, in the main affords no grounds for pessimistic views, but, on the contrary, conduces to reliance on the resources of nature (by which we mean Divine Providence) in this vast area. Genera- tions of men may weave their theories and propound their generalizations, but century after century the oceanic plants and animals maintain their abundance and demonstrate their independence of all artificial regulations. On our shores it may be wise or it may be politic to make such regulations, yet, speaking generally, they seem to have but a feeble effect on the great laws of nature, and especially on the wonderful cycle of 26 MAN’S INFLUENCE ON FOOD-FISHES. life culminating in the food-fishes. The story of these restric- tive measures hereafter to be detailed, indeed, shows that they must now be retained on another basis than that afforded by science. We may calculate, as the Duke of Argyll’s Commis- sion did, the probable duration of our coal-supply, but the perennial abundance of our marine food-fishes depends on so many factors, each of which has stood every test so well, that, after due precautions and careful experiments, we may, with- out distrust, look forward to the future. End-view of a vessel with otter-trawls on board. Aberdeen, August, 1898. To face p. 26} a A CHAPTER IL. Remarks on the Scientific Report to the Royal Commission on Trawling (1884) :— (a) Effect of Trawling on the Invertebrate Fauna of the Sea-bottom (forming Fish-food) and Collateral Relations with Pelagic Life. (b) Effects of the Hooks of the Liners on the same Ground. (c) Hffects of the Trawl on the Eggs of Fishes, on certain Ground- Fishes, and Very Young Fishes on the Bottom. The Recommendations of the Royal Commission on Trawling (1883-85), and the method adopted by the Fishery Board for Scotland in carrying them out. Closure of Areas. : Changes in the Trawling-vessels and their Apparatus. Changes in the Line-boats and their Apparatus. The present state of the Line- and the Trawl-Fisheries in relation to the Fishing grounds and the Fishes. REMARKS ON THE AUTHOR'S TRAWLING REPORT OF 1884. I. General Remarks. FULLY fifteen years having elapsed since the Report on Trawling on the eastern shores was presented to the Trawling Commission (composed of the late Earl of Dalhousie, chairman ; Right Hon. Edward Marjoribanks, M.P., now Lord Tweedmouth ; Prof. Huxley’; Mr W.S. Caine, M.P.; and Mr, now Sir T. F. Brady), it appears to be desirable to review the statements contained therein in the light of the information which the impetus given by the Commission has produced. Moreover, 1 Tt has been alleged that Prof. Huxley’s health prevented him from sharing in the responsibility for the conclusions and recommendations of the Report of the Commission. Cunningham, Marketable Fishes, p. 15. He at least read the scientific Report and expressed his approval of it. 28 REVIEW OF TRAWLING REPORT OF 1884. this examination of results is all the more necessary, since in 1893 another important body—viz., the Select Committee of the House of Commons on Fisheries, presided over by Mr Marjori- banks, M.P.—issued a new Blue-book containing the finding of the Committee and a mass of evidence. In criticising this Report on Trawling it is necessary to bear in mind that certain definite instructions were given by the Commission in regard to the hauls of the trawl. These fall under Section 6, and are as follow :—‘ The results of each haul of the trawl, so far as regards food-fishes, should be carefully registered, in order that positive data may be obtained: ‘(a) As to the proportional quantity of immature fishes taken at various seasons. ‘(b) As to the destruction of the spawn of food-fishes. ‘(c) As to the proportion of live and dead fishes.’ It is important to remember, also, that the choice of ground lay with the trawler in almost every case, and that the most productive ground, so far as could be ascertained, would in all probability be selected. In the Report of 1884 the fishes were grouped into ‘saleable,’ ‘unsaleable,’ and ‘young,’ the latter term being synonymous with that now in general use, viz. ‘immature ’—a term, indeed, which was introduced prominently in this Report with precisely the modern meaning. These three heads are well understood, and need cause no ambiguity, since even the fishing community are quite able to understand them—a size-limit, of course, in every case having been considered. To the Royal Commis- sioners the fact that a young or immature dab was under 7 inches was not of great utility, but the number of such young forms was of the utmost importance in view of the statements then prevalent. Due care was taken to see personally that every example was authenticated, and if any weight is to be attached to the statement that the ‘great defect of the Report’ is that no information whatever is given as to the limit of size 1 Prof. Ray Lankester, Sea Fisheries, Chicago Exhibition, 1893, p. 64. The communication, which appears under Prof. Ray Lankester’s name in this publication, is inserted in the Marketable Fishes by Mr Cunningham as his own. REVIEW OF TRAWLING REPORT OF 1884. 29 dividing the saleable fish from the immature,’ there will be little difficulty in remedying it. Besides, it was not the scientific observer who regulated the sizes of the saleable fishes, but fishermen engaged in an industrial pursuit, and who had to bear in mind the demands of the public. Moreover, a fish of a size that was saleable at St Andrews might not be so at Aberdeen, and vice versa, though, as a rule, the variation under this head was not great. According to the state of the market, again, fishes—e.g., gurnards—that were saleable at one season were unsaleable at another. As pointed out in the Report, ‘It is remarkable that so good a fish should be hable to variation in this respect, and that it should not always be taken to market, even during the height of the herring-season. Frog- fishes even occasionally found a ready sale in the great central towns of England after the head, skin, and fins were removed ; and in the Outer Hebrides dog-fishes formed, and still form, an important item in the crofters’ diet-roll, the piles of skins in front of their dwellings being characteristic. The supposition that because a standard of size is not rigidly in evidence on every occasion, the conclusions will be more or less fallacious, cannot be maintained when dealing with the question of the food-supply. The public do not care whether a fish is mature or immature in the scientific sense of the words, but they are greatly concerned as to whether a fish is saleable or unsaleable. Therefore, after the lapse of a considerable num- ber of years, the author sees no reason to alter the views held during the experiments for the Royal Commission on Trawling, and which have been adopted in dealing with the statistics of the Scotch Fishery Board in the present work. It is true the distinction between the two groups rests on a size-limit, and is by no means a haphazard convenience’; but it is unnecessary to dilate on the special features as to maturity or immaturity in an inquiry like the present—however important these may be in other respects. What has to be done is to discriminate between those which are marketable and those which are not. Besides, some writers seem to forget what was clearly stated more than once in the Trawling Report, viz. that the commercial ' Rept. S. F. B., 1894, p. 166, and present work, pp. 30, 31. 30 REVIEW OF TRAWLING REPORT OF 1884. ships avoided localities where small fishes abounded, whereas the ‘Garland’ and similar ships did not. They would not dip a second net where these formed the bulk of the haul. The trawling observations had to do with things as they were and are in the race for marketable fishes, and the exact numbers in each case are reliable. The statements in the official Report of the Scotch Fishery Board’ therefore, in regard to the alleged capture of immature fishes by the trawl, may with perfect justice be affirmed of other methods of fishing. For instance, how many mature plaice are caught by the liners in St Andrews Bay? As a rule not one. All are immature, yet the majority are saleable—even to the high sum of 26s. or more per half box of 6 stones. The experi- ments carried on with hook and line on board the ‘Garland’’ can scarcely be taken as average examples. Experience in line- fishing, as it 1s, proves that young round fishes of all kinds will be captured if the lines are shot amongst them, and perhaps of a smaller size than those caught by the commercial trawl. How often has it happened that the less enterprising liners fishing inshore have filled their boxes only with young haddocks of 5 to 7 inches proceeding inwards from deep water, while their more adventurous neighbours had quite as many boxes of large haddocks from the offshore. It has happened indeed that this capture of the small haddocks day after day has roused the ire of the offshore fishermen, who made a law for themselves, boarded the offenders’ boats and flung their small haddocks into the sea, just as in more recent times they did with their neighbours’ fishes when they defied the trades-union arrange- ment, and purchased mussels at a higher rate than was con- sidered reasonable, so as to continue their calling. Very small fishes (e.g. of 4 inches) are captured everywhere, that is on the grounds where they occur, by the ordinary methods of fishing. To take the fishes in the order in which they are mentioned in the Trawling Report, the following sizes formed the lower limit of the saleable fishes :—Skate (including grey, thornback, starry, sandy, &c.), 10-12 im. across the pectorals; herring, 7-8 1 8th Ann. Report, Part 111., p. 185. 2 Ibid. p. 189, REVIEW OF TRAWLING REPORT OF 1884. 31 in., but those obtained were all much larger; codling (young cod), 8-10 in., but no example so small occurred in the series ; haddock, 8-9 in., when so small their price is insignificant— about 1s. per box; whiting, 8-9 in.; poor-cod, 7 in.; bib, 6-7 —in.; coal-fish, 1 ft.; hake, 1 ft., though seldom seen below 15 in.; ling, 15-20 in.; halibut, 13 in.; sail-fluke, 8 in.; craig-fluke (witch), 7 in.; long-rough dab, 7 in.; turbot, 6—7 in.; brill, 7-8 me plaice, ¢ in.; dab, 7 in.; lemon-dab, 7 in.; sole, 7 in.; flounder, 7 in., rarely sold; grey gurnard, 9 in.; bream, 9-10 in.; cat-fish or wolf-fish, 15 in., though all those obtained were large. By the term ‘saleable, of course, saleable in the food- market is meant, since much smaller examples of every species might be utilised for manure, either as landed or after prepara- tion in a factory. In regard to the unsaleable round fishes, the remarks of the Commissioners of 1866 were :—‘ It has never been alleged that ling, cod, and conger, in which the line fishermen are so largely interested, or mackerel, pilchards, or herrings, upon which the seine- and drift-fishermen depend, are caught by the trawl in an immature and uneatable condition.’ ‘Whiting and haddocks of small size, thought marketable, are taken by the trawl; but fish of similar dimensions are also captured by the liners, against whom, indeed, the charge of taking immature cod has especially been brought.’ In the Report of 1884 it was stated that ‘a considerable number of young cod were present in most of the good hauls, but all were saleable fishes. Quite as many immature cod (codling) were caught by the liners in the same waters; and off the Bell Rock, perhaps, the proportion is even greater.’ The same state of matters exists at this moment. On the other hand, the number of very small haddocks caught by the liners, ¢.g., in 1898, off the east coast of Scotland, far exceeded anything of the kind captured by trawlers. The one mode of fishing was as destructive to these immature forms as the other. The small fishes swarmed on the ground, and were caught in every haul of the liners just as they were swept into the trawl, but many of the smaller forms escaped from the latter through the meshes while they were held fast by the hooks, and so ay REVIEW OF TRAWLING REPORT OF 1884. injured that, although they had been returned to the water, it is doubtful if they would have survived. The remarks made then (1884) on the capture of very young cod and very young haddocks, therefore, remain suitable for to-day, and at this moment (Oct. 6, 1898) numerous boxes of young cod about 10 inches in length come from the lines on the hard ground near Crail; and the same may be said of those on whiting, ling, hake, gurnards, coal-fishes, pollack, bib, and poor-cod. In the Trawling Report it was stated that large cod and other adult fishes were now seldom caught within the limits of the Bay of St Andrews, and this was in accordance with the evidence then obtainable. The use of anemones as bait, together with the closure of the bay, shows that as many as sixty or eighty good cod are occasionally caught by a single boat, the lines being buoyed and left in the water all night. Some fine congers, which do not appear in the Fishery returns, are also occasionally obtained off the east rocks. Moreover, excellent haddocks are procured in the same area early in the year, and for two years (1893 and 1894) small haddocks abounded. Large green cod also occasionally leap out of the water in pursuit of their prey, and are captured on the beach, while a few pollack are got in the salmon-stake nets or on hooks. It would thus appear that further experience leads to a modification of the statement mn the Trawling Report. The increase in numbers captured has been due less to the closure and absence of molestation than to the fixed and extensive lines and special bait. The closure of the mshore waters—eg., St Andrews Bay— must have conduced to the prosperity of the turbot and the brill of that neighbourhood, most of the turbot (ranging from 9-11 inches) which formerly were captured by the trawlers (sailing- and steam-) now being unmolested, and reaching the outer waters when of some size. ‘The salmon stake-nets, how- ever, on sandy beaches still prove destructive to many turbot from 5} inches upwards. These small examples of this valuable fish are only used as bait for crab-pots. It is true the trawlers sweep the outer waters into which the young turbot and brill REVIEW OF TRAWLING REPORT OF 1884. 39 pass, but the area is wider, and the size of those captured considerably larger. No fish formed the subject of greater solicitude in the Trawling Report than the plaice, both from its wide distribu- tion and its great abundance, as well as from the supposed view that this was a form specially destroyed by the trawl, which had cleared out of St Andrews Bay, for example, all the full-grown adults, and left only the smaller forms. It is apparent, therefore, that during the past twelve years such inshore waters have had sufficient time for recuperation—at least to some extent—if these views can be maintained. The results of the trawling-work of the ‘Garland’ up to 1892 have already been dealt with in this connection’, so that other observations, and the statistics of fishes captured by the liners in this area, have only to be considered. Without at present going into detail, it is found that comparatively few full-grown plaice are captured in the enclosed waters of St Andrews Bay. Most of the large specimens that have occurred have been either diseased—e.g., blind or emaciated—or injured. An enormous number of immature or half-grown plaice, however, are reared in the area, and are captured by the liners, chiefly with lob-worm, their lines being buoyed and left in the water for such periods as they please, relays of lines being often used. The success with which the local fishermen ply their trade in early spring amongst the plaice is indicated by the fact that a single haul of the lines of a small fishing-boat in February 1894 produced a sum of £9, and that a larger ‘catch’ was procured by the same boat within the week. The closure of the inshore waters, therefore, while it places the trawl-fishermen at a disadvantage, benefits the line-fishermen, and does not deprive the public altogether of the supply of flat fishes from the enclosed area. It does not, however, produce many large flat fishes, for as these get older they appear to seek the deeper waters outside the limit, either from a natural habit, or as the result of constant interference by man. This habit, indeed, was noticed in the Report when dealing with the question of instituting the closure within the three-mile limit, thus :— 1 «4 Brief Sketch of the Scottish Fisheries,’ 1882—1892, p. 6. M. R, 3 34 REVIEW OF TRAWLING REPORT OF 1884. ‘The flat fishes, such as turbot, brill, plaice, soles, dabs, and thornback (skate) would certainly be left in comparative se- curity m certain bays, as at St Andrews, the larger only, perhaps, seeking the grounds in the offing.” These larger flat-fishes, many of which are mature (that is, spawning) are captured outside the three-mile limit in great numbers, and thus the supply of ova and young fishes for the inshore waters is affected, for, as previously pointed out, the latter waters depend to a large extent on the former in this respect. Few or no spawning plaice (none within our experience) are ever captured within the bay, though eggs and young in various stages are abundant. It is stated, however, that adult ripe plaice were formerly procured by hook and line off the rocky shore towards the mouth of the bay between Boarhills and Fife-Ness, on hard ground on which no trawl could work. The adult spawning plaice in greater numbers occur in the offshore waters, and, so far as known, there is no passage of these from the outer to the inner area for the purpose of discharging their egges—as was formerly believed in regard to many fishes. If it had been for the advantage of the eggs and larval plaice that the adults should only spawn close inshore in the shallow water, there is no reason to doubt that such would have been the arrangement. It is apparent, however, that it is otherwise. Before reaching the shallow water of the bays the scattered ova have advanced towards hatching or have hatched, the majority probably in the latter condition, the open water being perhaps better suited for their safety. The yolk-sac of the larval fish is soon absorbed, the symmetrical post-larval condition is reached, by-and-by transformation occurs, and the little fish takes to the bottom, swarms being found in the muddy rock-pools towards the end of April and beginning of May. The life-history of this species would seem to show that—in dealing artificially with the eggs and larvee—the most natural method is to place the larval fishes, just before the yolk-sac is absorbed, some distance from shore. They are more or less transparent, and will escape many of the dangers they run in such waters, and, before being carried close inshore, will either be transformed or about to be transformed, and more capable of escaping, by their REVIEW OF TRAWLING REPORT OF 1884. 35 own exertions, from their enemies. If the larvee are placed in the sea close to a rocky beach or stretch of tidal sand or gravel, it is possible that many would be stranded by the tide. Therefore, though the observation that the young plaice (with eyes now on the right side) abound in spring in the shallow rock-pools and elsewhere is perfectly correct, it 1s no argument for placing the larval fishes in their neighbourhood, when in a truly pelagic condition. In the same way the spawning ling are found far from the inshore waters, their minute eggs being hatched in the open ocean, and the young stages passed long before reaching the margin of low water. The ling has not, indeed, been found in inshore waters till it reaches about 3 inches (34) in length, and then in very limited numbers. It is more frequently secured when from 6 to 8 inches in length— at extreme low water at the margins of the rocks. As it gets larger it seeks the offshore, and thus, as in the plaice, there is a double migration—the wafting of the eggs, larval and young fishes shorewards, and the return of the adolescent and the larger forms seawards. A similar life-history appears to be present in many of the food-fishes—e.g., the turbot, brill, and halibut, though in the case of the dab, long-rough dab, and some others, there are marked exceptions, as pointed out in the Trawling Report. Thus, ‘the large proportion of immature dabs found 15 miles off St Abb’s Head is interesting, and shows that such are not confined to shallow bays like that of St Andrews. Moreover, the occurrence of relatively small specimens at this and even greater distances from land would raise a doubt as to whether all such young forms have been reared on a sandy beach inshore?’ Since the foregoing was written, opportunities, by aid of the ‘Garland, for using the special trawl-like tow-net and the mid-water net near and at the bottom on the grounds 15 to 20 miles south-east of the Island of May, have been afforded, and great numbers of larval, post-larval, and young dabs, long-rough dabs, and other forms have been obtained, thus confirming the opinion formerly expressed. Moreover, the trawling work of the ‘Garland’ on its various stations from the Moray Firth to the Forth bears out 1 Report Roy. Com. on Trawling, p. 361. 3—2 36 EFFECT OF TRAWLING ON INVERTEBRATES. the same conclusion. Again, the deeper water is the home of the post-larval frog-fish, even the pelagic eggs being rather uncommon near shore. The adolescent and adults, on the other hand, are frequent in shallow sandy bays like St Andrews. It is apparent, from certain remarks in the preceding paragraph, that it is a mistake to say that the trawl alone can capture flat fishes. If the bait be suitable, the lines are toler- ably effective in regard to plaice, lemon-dabs, dabs, and flounders. Again, halibut-fishing (by hook) is the most pro- ductive method off the coasts of Iceland, Farée, and elsewhere, and even the turbot and the sole are occasionally caught by the liners. a. LEffect of Trawling on the Invertebrate Fauna of the Sea- bottom (forming Fish-food), and Collateral Relations with Pelagic Life. The value of the bottom-fauna, in regard to the sustenance of the food-fishes, has been fully recognised by all zoologists. In the Trawling Report for 1884 it was stated’, ‘There cannot be a doubt about the importance of maintaining the invertebrate fauna of these parts (Forth) in a flourishing condi- tion, since upon this many of the food-fishes depend for much of their nourishment; indeed, both adult and young fishes could hardly exist without such, notwithstanding the abundance of herring and other pelagic food at some seasons?.’ In considering the effect of the trawl on the sea-bottom, it must be borne in mind that while many sponges, zoophytes, - star-fishes, crabs, and shell-fishes are, in their adult state, inhabitants of the bottom, their larve and young are pelagic, that is, free-swimming, and quite beyond the reach of injury, so that were the majority of their parents killed and the sea- bottom rendered barren’ (of which, apparently, there is an 1 «A Brief Sketch of the Scottish Fisheries,’’ 1882—1892, p. 6. 20); Clie, ho BK 3 Vide an interesting Essay on this subject by Mr Anderson Smith, Trans. Highland and Agricultural Society, 1890, p. 45. EFFECT OF TRAWLING ON INVERTEBRATES. 37 absence of proof), swarms of the young would settle on the sites thus bereft of their predecessors. This interchange between the surrounding water and the bottom was pointed out in the Trawling Report, thus:—‘The sedentary fauna of any such ground ’—referring to fishing-banks— brought up in the trawl, does not, however, give the whole explanation, for it has to be remembered that almost throughout the entire year a constant succession of eggs or young forms is given off by the inhabitants’ (on the bottom), ‘while there is another and less minute increment derived from the older forms which are forsaking pelagic life to settle on the banks!’ It is the vast abundance of the pelagic fauna (which often has no connection with the particular ground examined), for instance, that is so important in regard to the food of the herring. Again, the forms immersed in the sand are, for the most part, free from serious injury. This was pointed out, speaking of certain annelids, in the Trawling Report, as follows :— The trawl has little or no effect on such as the foregoing, for their tubes in general are buried in the sand, their lives being passed in boring through it—for food and for shelter. So difficult is it to interfere with annelids sunk in the sand that one may sweep over a sandy surface, in which rare forms lurk, again and again, without discovering their presence. Even if a dredge is dipped, perhaps, only a head with its tentacles will reward the haul. Yet the sand may teem with them from 5 fathoms shorewards, and every spadeful—at extreme low water—may produce several. A single storm would appear to inflict greater destruction on these than it is possible to do by trawling?’ A careful summary of the effects of the trawl on the sea- bottom and its fauna was given at the end of the chapter on the ‘Fauna of the Trawling-Grounds in relation to Food- Fishes?’ and, with all the experience since gained, it is doubtful if any change can conscientiously be made. The only fact of moment to be stated is that it is several years 1 Report, Royal Commission on Trawling, 1885, p. 370. * Ibid., 1885, p. 368. e°1bid.,-p. 310. * 38 EFFECT OF TRAWLING ON SPONGES AND ZOOPHYTES. since the West Sands at St Andrews have been so extensively covered with marine organisms in débris, as, for instance, in the spring of 1857, when the misty air was alive with hooded crows and gulls that fed on the stranded animals. Smaller numbers have been seen, but not the vast numbers of sea-mice, sea-urchins, star-fishes, shell-fishes, zoophytes, crabs, and other forms. Besides the evidence (and there is much) of the capture and injury of the invertebrates in the trawl, and the conse- quent removal of part of the food of the fishes at the bottom, it is necessary to show that by constant trawling the sea-bottom is rendered destitute of nourishment for the food-fishes. Nature has provided in the case of such forms a remarkable power of recuperation, and a vitality that renders complete destruction difficult. Thus, the crushing and division of sponges is not followed by the death of all the fragments, and each of those which survives is capable of flourishing as an independent organism (not to allude to the liberation of ova which may happen to be present). The ordinary zoophytes are, as a rule, little affected by being carried on board ship, for, though in the more delicate, such as Tubularia, the soft polypites may fall off, they are reproduced when returned to the water. The very general provision of free-swimming buds which bear the reproductive elements is also a complete safeguard in the majority of this group, as already stated. Whence do the immense multitudes of the zoophyte (Obelia), which coats with a feathery forest every rope and buoy of the salmon stake-nets, come? Certainly not from the bottom, but from the myriads of minute pelagic jelly-fishes. Each half of a bisected anemone becomes an independent animal. Again, the sand-dwelling forms, such as Peachia and Edwardsia, the latter occasionally eaten by flounders and dabs, have pelagic young which are swept in every direction by the currents, or sometimes are carried hither and thither attached to the disks of the swimming jelly-fishes. These forms are, indeed, doubly pro- tected, since they live in the sand, and are seldom or never captured by the trawl, while their young are wholly pelagic. ‘The masses of dead men’s fingers (Alcyonium), though EFFECT ON ECHINODERMS. 39 occasionally crushed, would, for the most part, survive after their presence on deck’.’ The sea-pen (Pennatula), unless seriously crushed, readily survives—whether captured by trawl or hook, and would have no difficulty in again taking up its position on the bottom. ‘More decided injury is inflicted in many cases on the members of the star-fish group, which form no incon- siderable part of the food of the cod, haddock, and flat-fishes. Their brittle nature can ill withstand the rude trials of the trawl, and still less the trampling on the deck of the trawler, when the fishes are packed. All suffer more or less, the majority seriously; the forms most liable being brittle-stars, sea-urchins, and heart-urchins’.. Such was the view expressed in the Trawling Report, and, though less pronounced than some more recent opinions, it appears to state the case not unfavourably for the opponents of the trawl. Thus, the see- cucumbers, or Holothurians, often brought up from the bottom amidst stones and sea-weeds, are, for the most part, uninjured ; and, since they can voluntarily eject their entire alimentary system, and, as the patient and persevering Sir J. G. Dalyell showed, reproduce it without serious inconvenience in about three months, they are not likely to suffer from the hands of the trawler. The cod is a more exacting marauder of the bottom in regard to the smaller Holothurians, since they are chiefly found in its stomach, and not in the trawl. The ‘dreg’ of the Zetlandic fisherman, as he searches for ‘ yoags’ (horse- mussels) for bait, is also a more effective engine for the capture of the great ‘sea-puddings, as these Holothurians are called. While the brittle-stars are mutilated, they are by no means in all cases killed. The disk produces new arms where they have been broken off, and even an injured disk is repaired. While many of the sand-stars are entangled in the trawl, the majority escape by being imbedded in the sand, as can easily be shown by using a dredge on the same ground over which many a trawl has passed. The sea-urchins suffer considerably by the trawl in certain regions, as, for instance, in the outer parts of the estuary of the Tay, and it is doubtful if many of those 1 Trawling Report, 1884, p. 370. 2 Ibid., 1884, p. 370. 40 EFFECT OF TRAWLING ON ANNELIDS. injured would survive. On the other hand, many fine examples frequent the rocky borders where no trawl can touch them. The delicate heart-urchins are, for the most part, ruined in the trawl, yet the habitat of many is deeply buried in the sand beyond the reach of ‘sole’-rope or iron trawl-heads. Then, again, how many liners, how many mussel-, clam-, and oyster- farmers, would gladly subsidise the trawler to remove the swarms of common cross-fishes, whose multitudes form, for acres, a carpet on the bed of the ocean! Not a few annelids, such as sea-mice, nereids, ‘ scale-backs, serpulids, and nemerteans are entangled in the ground-rope and the net of the trawl, or in old shells and other débris from the bottom; but the injury to this group, as formerly mentioned, is not great, for many reach the sea alive amongst the -débris, and regenerate lost parts or discharge their ova into the sur- rounding water, or the larve swim from under the scales or from the sacs. It is an interesting fact in this connection that certain annelids at the breeding season undergo a change of form, leave the rocks, cavities under stones, or other places of shelter, and swim freely in the water (that is, become pelagic), discharging their reproductive elements when thus en voyage. It is during these pelagic periods that the huge Alztta wrens (a worm reaching occasionally about 3 feet, and a valuable bait for fishes) is thrown by storms in great numbers on the sands, even before the function for which nature ordained the pelagic period is performed. In the same way, Mr Thomas Scott, and Mr Duthie, recently found the inshore water at Castlebay, Barra, swarming with the sexual forms of a Nereis. An examination of the stomachs of food-fishes shows that such a provision as the foregoing is duly taken advantage of by them, and it is well, since the annelids are destined to perish after the escape of the reproductive elements. This subject was specially treated of many years ago’, and in the recent Reports of the Fishery Board further investigations have been made by Mr Ramsay Smith”. Some annelids, again, are purely pelagic, 1 Invertebrate Fauna and Fishes of St Andrews, p. 101, et seq., and also Dr Day in Literature, Fisheries Hxhib. 1883. 2 Vide Annual Report of the Fishery Board for Scotland, 1895. EFFECT OF TRAWLING ON CRABS. Al like Alciope and Tomopteris, the latter being one of the most striking features of the tow-nets, both inshore and offshore, and frequently in great abundance. Moreover, like the masses of Sagitta, it is eaten by many food-fishes, and is another evidence that the question is viewed only from one side, when all the wealth of the pelagic fauna and flora, especially the multitudes that are independent of any particular inshore area, or of any land at all, is overlooked. In 1884, after a careful and extensive inquiry, the effect of the trawl on the crab-tribe or crustaceans was given as follows :— ‘Like the star-fishes, the crustaceans are evidently damaged less by the effects of the trawl than by the feet of the men in gathering the fishes.’...‘ Many hermit-crabs, sea-acorns (Balanz), and Galatheew are returned to the sea alive. No injury to soft crabs was observed, and even so slender a form as the northern stone-crab, besides others, have been brought on deck in good condition!. The most prominent form referred to was the Norway lobster, which occurs in great numbers off the Forth, and a caution was given that care should be taken to return it to the sea alive, for it is chiefly injured on deck, in selecting the fishes. This is a very important element in the diet of the cod in the neighbourhood, and every measure should be taken for its preservation. The muscular parts of the abdomen form excellent food, but they are seldom brought to market. After hatching, under the abdomen of the female, the young of this lobster is pelagic, and is often found in masses amongst jelly-fishes off the Isle of May, forming a rich nourishment for the smaller fishes. Not a single lobster was observed in the trawl, and only from the inshore grounds, north of Aberdeen, were a few edible crabs obtained. The condition of the lobster- and crab-fisheries near St Andrews, Dunbar and elsewhere has improved within recent years, but how far this is due to the security from molestation which the crab-traps now have, and which has caused an increase in their number, or to other circumstances, is unknown. Taken generally, however, in Scotland, and so far as the statistics go, it is seen that there is a decrease in the quinquennial period 1888-1892 of 107, 840 1° Op. cit., p. 370. 42 EFFECT OF TRAWLING ON CRABS. lobsters, and 2013 crabs,—from that in 1883-1887. The decrease, however, seems to be in no way connected with the trawling industry. An increase both in quantity and value has since occurred. Trawling élose inshore with a small- meshed net (naturalists’) often produces large numbers of swimming crabs, but such is a rare occurrence on board an ordinary trawler. While, therefore, in trawling the injury to the crustaceans inhabiting the bottom is considerable, it has to be borne in mind that the pelagic crustacean fauna is one of the most marked features in the ocean, from the north to the south pole, and some of its members, e.g., barnacles attached to floating timber, sessile-eyed crustaceans, schizopods, and thysanopods are large enough to be the food of haddocks and herrings. Moreover, vast swarms of the smaller copepods nourish the younger food-fishes, and other types, again, are eaten by the larger fishes. Near the mouth of the Forth, at certain seasons (viz., in autumn), the water near the ‘Hairst’ at Crail is almost thickened by Thysanoessa. The tow-nets, under these cir- cumstances, soon become filled with their masses. Some, how- ever, may be disposed to treat the pelagic crustacean food, in connection with the nourishment of the fishes, with indifference, deeming such small animals of little moment in contrast with the more substantial denizens of the bottom. Irrespective of the circumstance that where they abound other and larger forms are in their wake, the fact that so gigantic an animal as the right, or whalebone-whale of commerce, lives solely upon such pelagic food in the Arctic seas, is sufficient to show how important an element this floating or swimming fauna is in regard to the welfare of the fisheries. The larger part of the masses in the tow-net, kindly used in 1893 by Dr Allan of Glasgow on board the whaling-ship ‘ Aurora’ of Dundee, con- sisted of the little crustaceans (copepods) above-mentioned, and this in the actual food-line of the whale as it swam to and fro in the water near an ice-pack. In our own waters, in addition to what is mentioned above, the sea-acorns, which so extensively cover rocks, stones, shells, and other structures within tide-mark, as well in deeper water (not to speak of & a i fy th * . one we ? j a 1 a . { To face p. 43) crab-pots on St Andrews “slip,” June, 1898. EFFECT ON ASCIDIANS AND MOLLUSKS. 43° those adherent to the skins of various whales), send off a multitude of free-swimming young which often crowd the inshore water, and extend far beyond before settling down on every available surface. Many other instances of the pleni- tude of crustacean pelagic life, and its adaptation for the nourishment of fishes, might be given, but sufficient has been cited to show that, besides the crustaceans of the bottom, those frequenting the water itself must be considered. The ascidians or ‘sea-squirts’ of the bottom are occasionally brought up in the trawl attached to shells, stones, and sea- weeds; and such forms, along with pieces of ‘sea-mat, are not unfrequent in the stomachs of cod and haddock. They are usually sent overboard in a condition by no means unfavourable for existence, though it has to be stated that numerous pieces of adherent sea-mat are often brought to shore on the ground- rope and meshes of the trawl from certain areas. The young ascidians are free-swimming (tadpole-like), and escape inter- ference till they settle on shells, stones, and sea-weeds. An interesting species in this group (Oikopleura or Appendicularia) is pelagic throughout life, and often occurs with its gelatinous ‘houses’ in dense multitudes in our inshore waters. It lives upon microscopic plants and similar structures in the water, while the smaller fishes and other forms prey on it. The last group of the invertebrates liable to injury by the trawl is that of the shell-fishes and cuttle-fishes (Mollusca). In 1884 the opinion expressed was that, ‘amongst the mollusks, the nudibranchs suffer a little on, deck, but the cuttle-fishes are more delicate, the majority being almost lifeless on removal from the net. The horse-mussels are occasionally fractured, but the whelks are uninjured.’ With the exception of water- logged wood bored by the ship-worm, horse-mussels, and whelks of various kinds, the majority of the shells brought on board were old and empty, either covered with growths of various kinds, such as zoophytes, or harbouring star-fishes and annelids in their interstices. As a rule, the horse-mussels were un- injured, and were consigned in safety to the water with the débris. On some of these such delicate organisms as the spawn of the Norwegian whelk (Fusus norvegicus), with the 4,4, EFFECT OF TRAWLING ON SHELL-FISHES. contained embryos in a thin capsule nearly an inch in diameter, were in perfect condition, and are now in the University Museum. These mussels occur in deep water, and often form large masses bound together by the threads of the byssus or ‘beard, and are quite as frequently drawn up by the liners on their hooks on their particular ground. Moreover, some of the liners for years used to bring quantities close inshore and deposit them off the rocks, thinking to create a bed of horse-mussels, but all disappeared. Not a trace remains of the many tons of horse- mussels thus transplanted, except an occasional and solitary small example in a chink of the rocks, perhaps an inshore and last surviving descendant of the transplanted shell-fishes. The living whelks were generally entire, those (Fusus) having the rare anemone (Hormathia the ‘necklet’) adhering externally, being in perfect condition, just as the much more delicate dead Natica, overgrown with sponge, and tenanted by a hermit crab, often came up uninjured. Masses of the spawn both of the great whelk and Fusus are frequently brought up by the trawl, but much of these is uninjured on again reaching the water. iven on great stretches of sand, in which many shell-fishes abound, comparatively few bivalves are interfered with, since they are buried more or less under the surface, and afford little hold to the ground-rope. The molluscan fauna of muddy ground is also inconspicuous in regard to injury, the smaller forms, which are sometimes numerous, escaping entirely. A single severe storm dislodges those on sandy ground more surely and extensively than years of continual trawling. The spawn of the whelks, and that of the nudibranchs and cuttle- fishes, is more likely to suffer, yet only to a limited extent, since all is again consigned to the water; and even a some- what lengthened exposure on deck is not fatal, if a little moisture be present, since many can be hatched after the arrival of the ship in port. In these remarks trawling over a mussel-bed, a clam-bed, or over an oyster-bed, is not considered, since it is strictly and rightly prohibited. On the whole, then, the shell-fishes do not suffer conspicuous injury by the use of the ordinary trawl, a fact sufficiently plain at St Andrews, where the larger mollusks were eagerly sought for bait by the EFFECT ON CUTTLE-FISHES. 45 fishermen using trawls. It was only after a storm that a few were occasionally procured in a trawl, but they never failed to find multitudes strewn on the beach at the West Sands after a severe storm, of which occurrences, indeed, zoologists have frequent personal experiences. Many cuttle-fishes, again, are captured by the trawl, and, as above mentioned, as a rule, are killed. But these are carefully preserved for sale, and in certain cases form no inconsiderable item in the proceeds of the fishing, for a sum of money, varying from £1 to £5 or even double the amount, is paid for each box of this valued bait. Further, the cuttle-fishes caught by the trawl are chiefly Lohigo and Ommastrephes—squids as they are usually called. Now, these are pelagic or free-swimming cuttle- fishes that do not necessarily fall under the bottom-fauna, though, when captured, they are probably seeking their prey there, or in the stratum just above it. The occurrence of Eledone (a ground-form) in the trawl is less common than the foregoing. Moreover, the squids are mollusks particularly obnoxious in the active condition to liners, so much so that advice has been asked as to how to get rid of them’. They occur in such numbers now and then that the fishermen despair of their catches, for the cuttle-fishes so disfigure the haddocks and other fishes fixed on the hooks—by devouring the muscles behind the head—as to render them unsaleable. So eager are they, indeed, that they sometimes follow the hooked fishes to the surface, as the lines are hauled, and are captured by a hand-net. Opinions, therefore, might differ as to the disadvan- tages of thinning this group of mollusks, which, when full- grown, are as much destined for the nourishment of the whales as the food-fishes, though they.are also eaten by larger examples of the latter (eg., the cod), and in their younger stages by many others. The case of the molluscan fauna of the bottom as food for fishes in relation to the action of the trawl, however, cannot be considered without the pelagic or free-swimming representa- tives of the same group on the particular ground. Almost all the shell-fishes living on the bottom send off pelagic young, * Vide Fourth Annual Report of the Fishery Board for Scotland, p. 204, 46 EFFECT OF LINES ON INVERTEBRATES. which crowd, throughout the greater part of the year, the region over the bottom, and ascend to the surface. Swarms of purely pelagic forms, such as Spzrialis, which, small though it be, is often eaten by ducks at the surface, and more abun- dantly by many young fishes near the bottom, are mingled with these and the larval nudibranchs, and occasionally even with Clione. The latter does not attain the bulk of the Arctic examples, but is by no means infrequent at certain seasons. Finally, the proximity of a mussel-bed, or the presence of an extensive coating of small mussels on the rocks, fills the water (June and July) with myriads of pelagic mussels, which by- and-by adhere to everything affording a surface, and form a favourite food of young fishes, and even of some of the adults. Irrespective of its direct relation to fish-food, this unceasing wealth of pelagic life has a close connection with the susten- ance of the bottom-fauna. Every invertebrate group, mentioned in the foregoing paragraphs, feeds on the pelagic fauna or its débris ; for, even the highest—viz., the cuttle-fishes—frequently devour the pelagic fishes. The whole system forms a wonderful cycle, and is far more important, from a fisheries’ point of view, than at first sight appears. In returning the contents of the trawl to the water, many forms are doubtless devoured by fishes in their descent to the bottom, just as the gulls which follow the herring-boats in the western lochs, or the wake of a trawler on the eastern coasts, swoop on the offal thrown overboard, or on the injured fishes which escape from the net at the surface when hauling. The same remark applies to the invertebrates thrown overboard by the liners. b. Effects of the Hooks of the Liners on the same Ground. In considering the effect of the trawl on the animals frequenting the bottom of the so-called fishing banks, it must EFFECTS OF LINES ON SPONGES AND ZOOPHYTES. AT be remembered that for ages the hooks of the liners have brought from the same banks representatives of every group of invertebrate animals, and that they are not always replaced im the sea alive. To the hooks of the liners, and also to their ready courtesy, most of the museums in this and other countries owe much. Some of the finest sponges in British waters, and the beautiful Venus’s flower-baskets and g!ass-rope sponges abroad have been procured in this way. A constant and large supply of hydroid zoophytes (‘sea-trees ’) is almost daily brought on shore from the deeper water. Some of the largest and finest anemones—studded, it may be, on the mandible of a small rorquhal, on a piece of submerged wood, on flat or other stones, on shells, or even on the thigh-bone of an unfortunate sailor—are similarly procured, along with stony corals and other coral-like structures (Polyzoa). If the trawler is accredited with the destruction of the great sea-pen (Funt- culina)' of the western waters, what is to be said of its ruddy ally (Pennatula), the ‘pink’ of the eastern fishermen? Almost every hook for considerable portions of lines on certain grounds bringing up its example, and this not by any action on the part of this pretty sea-pen, but simply by the force of the tide on the line as it drags the hooks over the surface of the soft ground. Several jars have been filled in a single trip with these from such sources, and yet no scarcity of them exists, nor is it hinted that the cod directly, or the haddock indirectly, will be robbed of its food. In the same way fine masses of ‘dead men’s fingers’ (Alcyoniuwm), the slender sea-pen of the Forth (Virgularia), a rarer and larger type new to this country, and other forms, are captured by the liners. Before and since the days of Edward Forbes the liner has been the mainstay for many rare star-fishes, and those who, like the genial naturalist just mentioned, have eagerly waited in the dim morning light—with the ready pail of fresh water, or, still better, with the jar of strong spirit—for the advent of the brittle Lwdia on board will appreciate the services of the _ 1 The late lamented Professor Milnes Marshall thought that the cod had a particular fancy for these great sea-pens, biting the tips as it swam amidst the phosphorescent stems, and leaving many in a truncated condition. 48 EFFECT OF LINES ON STAR-FISHES AND WORMS. fishermen in this respect. The daily captures of the common cross-fishes by the liners amount to a great annual total, yet such is unavoidable, and, indeed, the species is a pest to both the liner and the shell-fish farmer. As already said, it is the liner who procures many of the smaller holothurians, and who first made us acquainted with the rarer heart-urchins and sea- urchins (e.g., the ‘ piper’). In the group of the worms, one of the most gigantic Nemerteans (3 feet long and nearly an inch broad) has hitherto only come from the liner, and even the black line-worm is occasionally caught on the hooks. In the débris from deep-sea fishing-boats many of the rarer bristled annelids have been procured, and serpulids, the coral-like masses of Filigrana, and many others, come from the same method of fishing. It is an interesting fact, and a criticism on man’s influence on the inhabitants of the ocean, that neither liner nor trawler has ever captured the characteristic spoonworm (4chiurus pallasit) of St Andrews, and that storms alone toss them in multitudes on the beach. Food-fishes, however, find them out, and feed on them in their haunts. If we regard crab- and lobster-fishing as a branch of the trade of the limer—and it apparently has little connection in any respect with the trawler—the effect of other instruments than the trawl in reducing the number of these animals is conspicuous. The larger forms by-and-by become rare, and all become fewer. There is no proof that the trawl ever seriously affects either species, but its use, close to rocky borders in bays, may occasionally in former days have inter- fered with the traps. The hooks of the liner now and then capture both species, and furnish many hermit-crabs in shells, Norway lobsters, some of the rarer long-tailed forms (eg., Munida), and many of the short-tailed crabs (e.g., Atelecyclus and Hurynome). The hooks, likewise, bring up branches of submerged trees, coated with large sea-acorns, and affording shelter around the feathery tufts of zoophytes to many small sessile-eyed crabs. Fine masses of sea-mats and bunches of sea-grapes (As- cidians) are very common on board the liners, the hooks EFFECT OF LINES ON ASCIDIANS AND SHELL-FISHES. 49 penetrating the tough tests of the latter (Ascidians) as the lines are carried by the currents. Only from the liners are the curious and rather rare ‘sandy-nipples’ (Pelonaza) pro- cured—another of the remarkable forms characteristic of St _ Andrews. Hundreds are sometimes brought on shore, the drifting hooks having penetrated the thinner superior part of the test as the creature was plying its respiratory and nutritive currents on the bottom. None have yet been ob- tained from the trawl, for the ground is rough. The multi- tudes of dead shells brought up by the liners have been one of the richest fields for the encrusting forms of the Polyzoa— such as Leprala, the foliaceous—as Eschara and Retepora, and the more or less ramified Cellepora and Serialaria. When we come to the group of the shell-fishes or mollusks, the great variety that have been obtained from the hooks of the liners for hundreds of years is noteworthy. No collection of marine shells, worthy of the name, and made long before trawling was introduced into Scottish waters, exists—but is a standing proof of the fact that the hooks are almost as effective in furnishing rare specimens as the trawl. Some of the smaller forms, indeed, are more surely obtained in this way than by the trawl. Many are found in the deébris attached to the masses of horse-mussels so frequently brought up from the bottom, others are fixed to dead valves of the larger shells, or have their siphons, foot or other parts, pierced by the hooks. On the zoophytes brought up by the lines, such naked forms as Doto, and, on Alcyonvum, Tritonia plebera are found in numbers, while the larger Tritonia Hombergu, “a sea lemon,” is occasionally pierced by a hook as it drags over the bottom. The active cuttle-fishes do not seem to be frequently caught by the hooks, though, when attacking the fishes on the lines, or interfering with bait, an arm or other part is now and then fixed. In contrast with the trawl, however, few cuttle- fishes are captured by the lines. It is by no means to be supposed from the foregoing remarks that any blame is to be attached to the liner for interfering with the bottom-fauna. The notion would be unwarrantable. In the course of his operations the forms indicated have been M, R. 4. 50 EFFECT OF TRAWL ON EGGS OF FISHES. unavoidably hooked, and he brings them on shore or throws them overboard without giving much heed to them, unless requested to do so. No marine zoologist of note would con- sider, on this head, that the .liner was ruining the food of fishes, or to any extent affecting the welfare of the fisheries. On the contrary, his ready courtesy and keen observation have been frequently of the greatest service to the naturalist, who has been in the past, and is in the present, greatly indebted to him for many rarities. Yet the fact remains that the liner likewise captures numbers of every group whose wholesale destruction is by some attributed to the trawler. A calm survey of the situation, therefore, does not lend support to the notion that the trawl, as ordinarily employed in sea-fishing, is the only destroyer of the invertebrate animals of the bottom ; and, further, experience does not demonstrate that the sea- bottom in any known region has been, by the use of such line or trawl, so seriously impoverished as to be unable to support fish-life. c. ffects of the Trawl on the Eggs of Fishes, on certain Ground-Fishes, and very Young Fishes on the Bottom. In the Report of 1884 it was stated that ‘no feature was more remarkable in the inquiry than the rarity of fish-spawn (eggs) in the trawl—notwithstanding the careful search for such on every occasion. A few zoophytes, with clusters of adherent eggs—then considered to be those of the herring— were all that could be found. Accordingly, it was reported ‘that the trawl is almost innocuous so far as the ova of fishes is concerned ;’ and doubt was expressed, even if it passed over masses of the eggs of the herring, whether injury would always take place. It has frequently been stated that the use of the trawl on the spawning-grounds of the herring drives away the herring EFFECT ON EGGS OF FISHES. 51 and injures the spawn and spawning fishes. No details, how- ever, are given as to whether line-trawling or beam-trawling is referred to, nor are the facts dealing with the destruction of the spawn and the lesions of the spawning fishes presented in a tangible form. The herring is a fish sometimes exceedingly tenacious of purpose, and a thousand intervening boats with their nets, as at Peterhead, will not prevent it from breaking through and spawning inshore. Again, it has been known to leave old spawning-grounds, e.g., the ‘Old Hake’ off the coast of Fife, upon which no trawl ever descended, or indeed could descend with safety. Many reasons have been given for such changes—from the breaking up of the shoal by the boats at sea, to the firing of big guns—but there is a lack of defini- tion. In the Trawling Report of 1884, it was recommended that trawlers (1.¢., beam-trawlers) should avoid shoals of herring, and the same suggestion holds to-day. Since 1884, no opportunity of observing the effect of a trawl on ground covered by the spawn of the herring has occurred. The boats employed in herring-fishing in winter, however, frequently bring to port masses of the spawn of the herring on their decks, and little difficulty is found in hatching these eggs in the Laboratory, even after sixteen hours’ exposure on deck. Thus, even if the eggs of the herring were brought on board during the operations of the trawl, there are good grounds for believing that many would survive after being replaced in the water. In St Andrews Bay the local trawlers formerly brought to land pieces of seaweed, zoophytes, and similar structures to which the eggs of Montaeu’s sucker and other forms adhered. These were all readily hatched in the Laboratory. The same eggs are frequently brought up on the hooks of the liners. Further, about the middle of January 1886, one of these local trawlers brought a huge adherent mass of large eggs amongst mud to the harbour—thinking it was the spawn of the salmon. After lying on deck a considerable time, the attendant removed the mass from the mud and débris, rather rudely tore it in several pieces, and placed them under sea-water—some of the advanced embryos escaping in the process. The majority of 4—2 52 EFFECT OF TRAWL ON EGGS AND YOUNG OF FISHES. these eggs were hatched, and the larval fishes were vigorous, and enabled an account to be given of the development of the wolf-fish (‘ cat-fish’ of the fishermen), to which it was found the eggs pertained. At least once since the same eggs have been brought up in the trawl (from the Forth) about the period of hatching. It was rare to find, even in such sandy bays as St Andrews, that the egg-‘purses’ of the thornback or other forms were brought in by the trawl, though many containmg embryos are stranded on the West Sands after storms in October, and especially in November. Such eggs are at least as frequently procured on board the liners, e.g., those of the grey, starry, and sandy rays. Before the spawn- ing of the sand-eel was fully elucidated’, it was often a matter of conjecture as to how the ova escaped the small trawls on inshore ground ; but now the eggs are known to be adhesive— probably to the sand, and thus avoid interference. The ordinary trawl, again, seldom or never retains such active ground-fishes as the smaller rocklings, the gobies, the gunnel, the eel, and the sand-eel, while the glutinous hag and the lamprey are almost unknown in it. The hag-fish is, on the other hand, caught abundantly by the liners when they shoot their lines too near a well-known ‘ hole’ south-east of the Island of May, and the lamprey occasionally adheres to a fishing-boat. When the trawl is used on hard ground, wolf-fishes are often captured, but they are as common on board the liners on the same areas. Similar remarks apply to the dragonet on soft ground, and perhaps it is more frequent in the trawl than on the lines. If a trawl were to pass over masses of the spawn of the herring at the moment the young fishes were escaping, the ground-rope and other parts would certainly do serious injury— just as a sweep-net on the rivers would to the tender young salmon lying with the large yolk-sac amongst the gravel of the spawning bed. A wound of the yolk-sac alone is generally fatal. The extraordinary multitudes of tiny young herrings (of the thickness of thread) occasionally carpeting square miles of 1 Vide Ninth Annual Report Fishery Board for Scotland, p. 331, and Dr Masterman’s interesting account, Ann. Nat. Hist., Sept. 1895. Wing of otter-trawl at stern of ship. The chain and block passing obliquely from the right is for hoisting. The cod-end of the net, with a rubbing-piece, is tied to the wing (for drying) on the upper right. To face p. 52] EFFECT ON YOUNG FISHES. 53 the sea—in St Andrews Bay, for instance, in March, would indicate the propriety of protecting them from all interference on this head, especially as they are then frequently just above the bottom. The very young sand-eels in the same way are often in great numbers just over the bottom, and, as this fish is perhaps next to the herring, the most important food-supply for the more valuable food-fishes, it lkewise should not be interfered with. The enormous numbers of sand-eels on certain fishing-banks is one of the features of spring, and they are often mistaken by the fishermen for young herrings. The habit of the adult in burying itself in moist sand at and near low water is another illustration of the fact that a trawl may pass frequently over the same area, and yet leave, irrespective of those that escape through the meshes, a considerable number of animals untouched. In the course of the ordinary trawling on the fishing-banks, no indication of the great number and variety of the post-larval and very young fishes is obtained. They are swept through the meshes, or otherwise escape. Yet, on sinking the great tri- angular mid-water net to within a fathom or two of the bottom, or by using the bottom trawl-like tow-net, crowds of the post- larval and very young food-fishes—flat and round—are captured ; for example, those of the long-rough dab, lemon-dab, top-knot, ling, frog-fish, gurnard, dragonet, herring, and other forms. Neither trawler nor liner would seem to interfere at the stages indicated with these on such areas. In the same way, on other grounds, vast numbers of the young sand-eels, from 15 to 40 mm. (that is, from 2 to 1,9, inches long) occur in the surface-nets in May, of which the only knowledge hitherto obtaimed was from the mouths of the fishes captured by liner or trawler, as neither interfered with them directly or indirectly in the pursuit of his calling. The young fishes, on escaping from the pelagic eggs, are at first helplessly borne hither and thither by the currents, but the nature of their pigment, or even their transparency in most cases, probably proves protective. They are incapable of seeking shelter anywhere for a considerable time. When the flat fishes descend to the bottom their protective pigment on the upper 54 RECOMMENDATIONS OF COMMISSION. side so closely mimics the sand or mud which they frequent that they are independent of growths, such as zoophytes or sea- weeds’. The very young round fishes again keep to the open water until they are of some size, and do not seem to seek either food or shelter at the bottom, and thus do not come in the way of the trawl. As they get older, many, such as the cod, coal- fish, and pollack, approach the rocky margins, swimming actively amidst the forests of tangles and other sea-weeds, and feed on the abundant animal life in that region. There they are also freed, for the most part, from interference by man. THe RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE ROYAL COMMISSION ON TRAWLING (1883—85) AND THE METHOD ADOPTED BY THE FISHERY BOARD FOR SCOTLAND IN CARRYING THEM OUT. CLOSURE OF AREAS. IT is now necessary to glance at some of the efforts of man to interfere with the marine food-fishes. As many are aware certain areas of the east coast have been closed for fully 12 years, and the whole of the three-mile limit for a shorter period. The former areas were selected in 1884 and 1885—very much at the authors suggestion—by the Royal Commission on Trawling and its lamented chairman, the late Lord Dalhousie, one of the most deservedly popular administrators Scotland has ever had. No one has watched with keener interest, therefore, the result of this experiment than the author, who felt a certain amount of responsibility, at least to science, on these important investigations’, After operations of more than 1 These young flat fishes swarm all round our shores in April and May, on sandy and muddy flats, shallow rock-pools, estuaries, such as the Eden, and in the Swilcan burn as it debouches on the sands at St Andrews. They also, however, occur in the deeper waters. 2 Those who read the Fishery Boards reports of to-day would imagine that the whole Trawling experiments and their adjuncts were the creations of the CLOSURE OF FORTH, ST ANDREWS, AND ABERDEEN BAYS. 55 twelve years’ duration can it be said to-day that the closure of the areas of the Forth and St Andrews Bay or any other area has been followed by a notable increase in the numbers and in the size of the food-fishes therein? What evidence have the experimenters produced in regard to the oft-repeated statement that trawling on the same line soon exhausted the stock of fishes? What has been done—in the opportunity afforded by closure—to increase the valuable forms such as the sole and turbot in Scottish waters ? Before answering these, it may conduce to perspicuity if the various steps of the executive are briefly narrated. The areas carefully selected for closure—in 1884 and 1885—were, from south to north, the Forth, St Andrews Bay, and Aberdeen Bay. The Forth gives the results of closure in a great estuary or inland gulf having a considerable depth of water and various intrinsic sources of food-supply. St Andrews Bay is a typical shallow sandy bay on the east coast, with the estuaries of the Eden and the Tay opening into it. This area is more open to the North Sea than the Forth, and thus the “pulse” of the North Sea is more readily felt. The third, Aberdeen Bay, is wholly different from the others, since its perfectly open sea- board is defined—to the three-mile limit—only by artificial lines running eastward from Girdleness on the one hand and the Cruden Scars on the other, a distance of about 18 miles. It appeared to be important to have an accurate record of the seasonal variations of the food-fishes in Aberdeen Bay—for con- trast and comparison with the two former areas, since the coast is even more exposed to the North Sea than St Andrews Bay. The Reporters in the Sixth Annual Report of the Fishery Board (Prof. Ewart and the late Sir Jas. Gibson Maitland and their able assistants, the late Mr Jas. Duncan Matthews and Dr Fulton) fully understood one main function that was to be performed by the trawling experiments of the ‘Garland, viz. “what effect this mode of fishing was likely to have upon the ultimate productiveness of the waters around the coasts of Scotland, and especially in the territorial waters.” Board itself, whereas they were carefully discussed and mapped out by the Trawling Commission and especially looked after by Lord Dalhousie. 56 PROCEDURE OF FISHERY BOARD. After a very brief experience, however, the Fishery Board ceased to examine the last area on the ground that “it has been impossible to obtain accurate statistics owing to the limited nature of the area closed, and for the reason that the takes of the ‘Garland’ have been extremely variable, and the results have not been considered of sufficient importance to warrant Aberdeen Bay being further closed for experimental purposes.” There can be little doubt that the cessation of experiments in Aberdeen Bay arose from a misapprehension. Carefully considered advice had been given to the Fishery Board by Lord Dalhousie, and he had exerted himself to procure the necessary supplies for carrying out the experiments in the selected areas—which he, as Secretary for Scotland, by and by closed. These experiments were to form the basis for future fishery legislation, and, therefore, their importance was beyond question. For the carrying out of the experiments, the Fishery Board, possibly from lack of funds, deviated from the fundamental advice given, viz. that a powerful ship (like a first-class trawler) capable of carrying a 50-foot beam, and fit to proceed to sea in rough weather, should be procured, together with a smaller steam-vessel or tender for inshore work. The Board unfor- tunately selected an inefficient ship—both as regards the eastern seas and the manipulation of a trawl of sufficient size to search the grounds in an effectual manner. This has more or less crippled the experiments, especially as the work has only been conducted by day, and as a rule by a statistical, not a fishery expert, on board. In carrying out the experiments lines were selected in the various closed areas, and along these the ‘Garland’ worked at intervals. Unfortunately, no regularity as to date, so important in making comparisons year by year, was maintained. This trawling along lines was the advice of the Trawling Commission, but the selection of them in the particular areas was left to the Board. At this moment the author is inclined to think that 1t would have been as well to make loops in stated parts of the areas so as to allow greater freedom in connection with wind and tide. Indeed, it may be a question whether perfect FURTHER CLOSURES, 1887—1889. 57 freedom should not have been given, so that the ship might, at uniform intervals, search the area in its most productive parts. Shortly after the commencement of the operations the Fishery Board, as just mentioned, released Aberdeen Bay, and after a brief inquiry by aid of the ‘Garland’ in August, 1886, resolved to close the three-mile limit in the Moray Firth from the Ord of Caithness to Brora, Tarbat Ness, Balintore, then a point opposite the mouth of the Findhorn river, and thence to Kinnaird Head. This was done, it was alleged, in order “that valuable scientific results might be obtained were beam-trawling restricted in that district.” In addition, the areas of the Forth and St Andrews Bay were increased seawards. The Board considered that the closure of the Forth and St Andrews Bay had already made signs of improvement both in the number and size of the less migratory flat fishes, a conclusion, on their own showing, subsequently abandoned. The high average of fishes caught by the ‘Garland’ in the closed waters in 1887 still further seems to have influenced the Fishery Board in closing additional areas. Thus the territorial waters between Red Head and Kinnaird Head were closed in February, 1889, and thereafter the area of the Clyde. The ‘Herring Fishery’ Act of the same year, again, brought about the closure of the whole of the Scottish waters within the three- mile limit; and soon (1891) the entire Moray Firth from Duncansbay Head to Rattray Head was closed “to protect the fishes on their spawning-grounds (eg. Smith Bank) and to ascertain the extent to which such measures are likely to be beneficial to the fish-supply.” The scientific grounds on which such action was taken have in the first place to be dealt with. The political or social reasons which may have had influence in effecting the closure do not at present concern us. Now it will, in the first place, be apparent that before any reliable results could have been obtained from the experiments Lord Dalhousie’s Commission mapped out, fresh areas were closed. The principle on which the closure was originally applied was that systematic and careful examination of these areas should be carried out for a considerable time. But such 58 BOARD'S REASONS FOR FURTHER CLOSURES. was impossible in the circumstances—especially of time and ship. Further, when the high averages of the ‘Garland’s’ captures in 1887 in the Forth and St Andrews Bay are critically examined it is found that these were largely due to the fact that work was carried on solely during productive months, viz. May, June, August, and September, no winter month with its small captures reducing the average. The same misapprehension occurred later, when contrasting the captures of the ‘Garland’ during the first five years with those of the last five years of the period. The Fishery Board came to the conclusion that, since the captures during the first period were greater than in the second, deterioration had taken place in the protected waters—a very different finding from that (based on their earlier experiments) which they had formerly given as a reason for extending the closed areas. The Board now asserted “that there has been a diminution of the more important flat fishes in the closed waters, instead of an increase as was anticipated; and that this may probably be traced to the influence of beam-trawling in the open waters where the fishes spawn.” Consequently it was urged that the Board should experiment by closing certain spawning-areas, such as the Moray Firth, and it was done. No one will question the right of the Government to take such a step in the interests of the fishing-population—on philanthropic, social, or even on political grounds; but if such a step were taken on the basis of the scientific evidence furnished by the Fishery Board, then it would appear that the premises (and here all matters of fact are included) do not warrant the conclusion. There is, for instance, a serious misapprehension in contrasting an experimental period of five years in which a preponderance of work falls on the summer or productive months with an equal period in which the preponderance falls on winter or comparatively unproductive months. Let one in- stance suffice. In St Andrews Bay, in the first period, no hauls of the trawl were made in the unproductive month of February, whereas no less than 21 hauls occurred during this month in the second period. The two cases are thus widely different. 59 CHANGES IN THE TRAWLING-VESSELS AND THEIR APPARATUS’. With the exception of a few small sailing vessels and boats, trawling in Scottish waters is carried on, as it was in 1884, almost exclusively by steam-vessels; but, whereas at the latter period many of the vessels were old tugs or modified paddle- steamers formerly used for other purposes, most of the modern vessels, e¢.g., those sailing from Granton and Aberdeen, are specially built for the purpose. The finest vessels do not cost much more than the serviceable vessels of the General Steam Fishing Company did in 1884, viz., £4500, but very considerable improvements have occurred in the arrangement and equipment. -Some of these iron ships are 100 to 120 feet between the perpendiculars, and considerably more on deck, with a depth of 10 to 12 feet. The paddle-ships at Montrose’ are 116 feet between the perpendiculars, 21 feet broad, and 10 feet deep; while the fine screw vessel is no less than 120 feet between the perpendiculars, 21 feet broad, and 11 feet 6 inches deep. The three latter have comparatively low bows, like many of the ships from Granton. The newer ships at Granton have also increased in size. Moreover, greatly creased height is given to the bow of the vessels at Aberdeen, so that the foothold on the fore-deck must be very uncertain, especially if slippery ; but the water is kept out of the ship by such an arrangement. The after-part of the ship, however, is more or less flat, so that the trawls can easily be worked. These vessels range from 140 to 180 tons burthen, with engines from 40 to 65 horse-power. Instead of having the steam-winch near the fore-cabin, in the newest ships it is placed on deck close to the engine-room, so that the steadiness of the ship is increased, and the bow kept out of the water. The screw-vessel at Montrose has two 1 This account may be contrasted with that in the Trawling Report of 1884. 2 Messrs Joseph Johnston & Sons. 60 CHANGES IN TRAWLING VESSELS SINCE 1884, winches, one being behind the foremast, the other (smaller) behind the mainmast. The latter is very useful in discharging fishes, and in working the dandy. In general, the Granton ships have the steam-winch in front, with the capstan behind, just before the engine-room, a different arrangement from that at Aberdeen. Moreover, a decided improvement is introduced by the presence of a ‘brake’ in connection with this apparatus. In. 1884 reliance was placed on the old hawser fixed to the trawl-warp in the case of the net being held by a sunken wreck or a rock. Now, the moment the net is fixed, the ‘brake’ (which is secured to a moderate degree) permits the trawl-warp to run out, and thus save the net from serious rupture or total destruction while the ship is being stopped. In the Granton ships an iron-wire rope is used instead of a hawser from a hook on the mainmast, to save rubbing on the rail. This is fixed to the trawl-warp by spun-yarn. The length of the trawl-warp, which is of steel-wire rope, ranges from 200 to 240 fathoms. The warp has six outer and a central strand. The older warps had a Manilla centre, but the newer have wire. : ‘COQI 0} Q8ZI Wo YJUOW 39d [ney] SIN Subislt Aldy a IVs HO AnaNON ONIMAHS A1aVL i ATAVL p 3 : f an i ‘ i a ge eanh tte prin ai aie scien —— no = eee Hee. f ¥ ‘ a5 Ares: vas * , A As on SRE Rill in es HR EC a, . t h - ~ : ¥ a §Loz 196 grSi olvz 1991 Lbzz Fool v6S CzSS OgII s[e}0 |, €1 09d g9S1| ob6z | = gSSI QIe “AON, o0S6 cz "190 OI -ydasg ‘s(MeET JO “ON y ofty 86 QSgi 66¢ 06 1661 cz “ony ofii ov Li Aqn{ L6oly | ovit 6£6 —- Ge eae 996 S6€ — zl Sgz -- S6b1 | €Lo C1€ — GSI Ol ounf | Ae LV, ors ZO vzI Cue — nes 9S 6v1 OI!I — 6z VE IZ ¢ SI $ Indy jyore | “qoW —|| se zy ‘uel ||Jo°on S681 v6gI £6g1 ZOQI 1681 o6g1 6881 883! L981 9881 ‘AVG SMHUGNV LS NI ONITIMVAL «SAONVTYVO» “‘S6QI 0} OQQI Wor; YJUOW sod sahista AladvVaIlveNO.4O aedIWINs ONIMAHS AI VL iss hee BG eel P Se ecTaS iy ile ny eet Sie iti ® ‘ITA woes 10; $6g1—z6eI ,, | ep . iS dp es, S Nn é BE | SR | Fe] mee | ae | se ios ae | ao il pee | ze n oO = =o a Som | ao | a2 = o © ot m 9 © 2 © ot an) Bee es Poe | eo Fee o — ra 2 @ ® 6, @ = STIVLOL, TAVH Yad ADVAAAY | ‘TIA NOILVLS 89 ori | zbgls S$ €11 || 6L1vz| 9gg4 | C6zo1 06 €zz || 12z9 | zogi | 69br of Gol s||eOOSe IeLe2. | cole or 06 giiv | Sovr | €12z 9S L9 LS6v | Llzz | ogoz oS T1l ||;ecen |esOOL | COOL 40) Egr || €ggLE) 66So1| vootz GZ bie. |agoog elze | S6e9 of QgZ1 || O£04 | ozol | O109 zlz €z gbz || €1g9 | S6S | giz9 gor ofz | zt1 || vig | SzSS | 6hoz GLI 69 Sor || g£6z | ogii | z6L1 ee) i?) eS = ee as, hy 5 me <§ Ser eral ee a a ae | a Soul a= | o$8 Bro aa ico any Oe Os 88 Le sole 8 eas ee <3 o S een mee re: o eo ® SNOILVLS TIV LV TAV]Y Wd AOVATAV Soi a OL UWOT}VIG YoRs ye (SdYSty] aqveyesuy) pure o[qva[es) TAVE] Wid ADVUAAV ‘IT SNOILVLS ‘AVG SMAUGNV LS NI ONIIMVUL «.SAONVTUVD » ‘AL ATAVL | S681 | VO6gI £6g1 | z6gI | 16g1 O6gI 6881 88st | Lggi | 9881 | S6g1—9gggI | S6g1—16g1 | 06g1—9gg |—_—__—— map inde phan a: er en aetna Aiea Sandy Ray Sail-Fluke Thornback Starry Ray Conger Flapper Skate Herring Catfish Plaice Dab | ee ee eee | wo | Haddock TA DIEE Re “GARLAND’S” TRAWLING IN ST ANDREWS BAY. 1886—1895. STATIONS I. TO V. | AVERAGE : Torats PER HAUL No. OF o ean . : a 5 YEAR | (fe St bp 3 5 ai «| sy Se 1 @ pa Warnes Haus lees S| 82 | wen 5 | E s E z B/e|S)a |e Ss a 2 re & ae a @ 3 3 2s le eS Sisserises| Ol} 3 | 2 A | Be iele lel e| Sie la ies si ee) Se lee =| E ei | m | =| Os 5 oe ee i | = |S | | | = ae i 17 1886 | 1204 | 1038 | 24 63 | 14 | 159 13 | 411 22 2 16 I 7 I —}— 70} 61 9 | 24 20 1887 | 3035 | 2605 | 105 86 | 4 | ror10 33 | 1048 | 142 | 13]}— | 4] 65|/—|—}|]—! 4] 6]—|]| to | —] x |/151}130! 50 | 52 25 1888 | 2650 | 2373] 12 65) 8) | 863))) 2585) ory 4 8 | a 2 44| 5|—| -=— | —]| — || 106) 94 | 34 | 20 34 1889 | 4141 | 1889 | ro | 30 | 15} 32] 53) 633] 134 | 7 | HE TE Bi ae Ree ef er hy | = | 1S 30 1890 | 5070 | 2206 5 EF 45 45 | 388 | 658) 122 3 S12 | Bl oh | | ee se 2| 1 || 169! 73 | — | 21 126 1886—1890 |16100 |1o111 | 156 | 266 | 86 | 2109 | 745 | 3267 | 424 | 33) 3] 7 | 94) 50)°3 | — |f22) 37} —| 11 2| 2 |\127| 80 | 16 | 25, 33 1891 | 1598 | 2865 4 22 | 20 | 56} 114 | 449 41 re aa taney, 5} 1 |—]| 13 | 14} 1 — | 86) 2 48| 86 | — | 13 40 1892 || 1671 | 1241 10 76 | 45 104, 356 | 1096 | 117 9 | 8 I 2 5} 1 | —| 30] 17 | —}| — 176] | 41] 31 | — | 27° 30 1893 1788 | 744 | 12 78 | 78 834 91 | 400 66 3 | —|- 5} 3] 2 )—]12) 12)/—]} — Aa ale SON eau yan ere 20 1894 1145 | 1436 3 17 17 | 422 85 179 89 oo we 2 WG re PhO | ie | ee er ye | eS 20 1895 1733 | 2973 15 12 | 12 | 310 38 | 897 | 140 i Sy et 7 WS So) =| Ba eal eee es | 86 |148 | 15 | 44 \||—-—- | |= = . | |= } oe 143 1891—1895 || 7935 | 9259 | 44 | 205 |172 | 1726 | 684 | 3021 | 453 | 15 | 12] 3] 23] 68 | 4 | 1 | 95 | 60] 2 — |266 | 4 || 56| 64} 12] 20 es —_— == SS |e Ss 269 1886—1895 (203 19370 | 200 | 471 i 3835 | 1429 | 6288 | 877 | 48 | 15 | 10 |117 |118 | 7 I |217 | 97 | 2 Ir |268 | 6 89] 72 | 14 22 . A “GARLAND'S” TABLE VI. TRAWLING. ST ANDREWS BAY. SALEABLE FISHES. Long-Rough Dab . Do, A Size in Tnehies 1891/1892 1893/1894) Totals Sg2] 1895 |-rotats g wn un uw un in ow tl n by Ha ral x bub we nalu lle nile Ilell flathl vive | elliiife PEP Ltrst I} law | wl lave Pitta Jal Tlelamul sla. lallttlas|* Tela biittiet-title| aa ~ an le L1it-teal tt Bu | | awe tes IT tbteawlt Lele lw VT ttle ttittt- [enes | oo \thes 11 It w peel LJ i leecn a | n wm lew! |ouws 11 PT tet ban nos }lewellellill- [live n8S]-4 © | ve low! | linteoe bimini P11 t teal Eeeive emtmlel ll welow Saen1 loll = SSnlli)-tii aS = nw le@l lll lal 3 Ll eRlaslalle-~ ~ a a “aD an (a rea Bann | PlE2 1-4 = he Su ~ “=n tc a os) CES Oren os » lwBl Ee aSnabu SS-~1-1-1 1 Ce) esos) SIS n es u 4s ° LT teatteonIS1 111411 ~ | |Gnwe ISS lle-&11881-ls- [B85 PP hee PIS 0 eTe titi 5 1 1 16 6 1 22 Ot feathers 0a kath Jy teiee ed IM Poet ere) ek In es Phatuwll ileal llel Lh) lawtlI Silliet Fellletl ll lucl-w-1 leotue | 1Se2 281) 1 11 1 Slleleu SCS en a Gi l@a~] 1a S-F8 1] 1a lal g We i} 3 we lallele8alel 1) los] ~ ~ & Suk Lllllle&Sststlitistt 3 °o wea wn Ft Oe O--e £3 Son : Sx ol Sa aQ/- us pant IS | PES ey PRS tele lo Pitti tied eS SS ie a Ses a ls [[allwolaSatSlaeclus! 1112s fill -8eVoseseilttenttiiitit--fettititt-[«| eee RCS eSes See iien NURSES Se SeseN elie ER SES Sie i Hilie SSS ees el MS Weis T-1A1111-F11S-111 Seen Coen lena OES ie ES ene en eee PSG Ee ee eden eon ef Mia iitesiS Hie nite Olen teat thtiaine Pies (otal Meine esilee WN [Vimolt lauestatlmoll ll -wlewloole li lat le| 1 es ee PELE T dade Ie Ind 1 | [lhl ll-ale8eomle-~le-I 1111 iMate sce ie [Mitte -St talent tte leweal lille TG es ess ed eee a) o = y o n or) = = oe -) 87 | 53 [149 | 462 820 1406 |148 |549 | 3278 125 |127 |110 | 67 os Dat ra) 3 SPECIES Grey Skate 1. Thornback Ray D 0s Sandy Ray Starry Ray Herring Cod Do. Macdlock Do, Do, Whiting 1. Do, Coalfish SIO ReSSiEIS Sail- Fluke Red Gurnard zene augh Dab Os Sand-Pluke* Turbot Lemon-Dab Sole Pounder Do. Grey Gurnord D 0. Catfish Sprat Conger in the Blue-book probably refers a ee ee eee Bei A let ait DECEMBER Average er Haul ee ee eral Le cen of each SPECIES SS 890) 1891/1892|1894| Totals Species pecies 5 5 3 5 5 f 269 — | — | — | — | — 42 Grey Skate 15 —} ©{—}— I 56 Thornback "20 r|/—/|—]| 2 5 58 Starry Ray "21 —;}|—} 1] — I 4 Sandy Ray OI I};—| 2;— 3 208 Herring 77 2) —— | —— | — 2 24 Cod 09 — | 2] 45 1 | 48 1193 Haddock 4°43 Rfo 27 | 18 | 1. { 218 772 Whiting 2°86 =e eal ire Oe 19 Whiting- Pout "07 Pee WN ere ee I Ling "003 Ee | 4 yO, | 1G 137 Long-Rough Dab 500 Shee ke 14 Turbot 05 —}—}|—|—|] — 3 Brill OI —|—] rf — I 4246 Plaice 15°41 4 | 59} 11} 3} 100 || 9323 | Dab 34°65 — | — 1 | — I 112 Lemon-Dab “41 — | — | — | — | — 2 Sole "007 = |e rec cea | ieee 65 Flounder "24 2 se) Se 2 1947 Grey Gurnard 723 emcee sia ee I Catfish 003 — | — 2);— 2 2 Sand-Eel "007 4114 |) — | 17 40 Sprat "14 ee ite) Flapper-Skate 03 —}—;—}|—|] — I Poor Cod "003 90107 |(S5 | 17 \°417 {158280 500 O17 39 DECEMBER Average per Haul fennel SPECIES gpeach 1889|189288|1890/1891|1892|1894/Totals|| Species Species Gis Sea et | t I 118 Angler 43 he, See eee 5 27 Skulpin 10 A a Saal Tho hd 2 28 Armed Bullhead “10 Sa. See hh St I Goby "003 Hie meee ha 6 Lum psucker "02 fe See a I 12 Short-spined Cottus 04 Be eae ee he Po fe) Butterfish 03 et eet tee ee ee — 2 Five-Bearded Rockling "007 a ee Seep ls i I Montagu’s Sucker "003 rq'b-ey Tbr | Se Beil 2 9 205 j iy we « 5 re, Sa ee ACME, | WINE y! GARLAND'S” TRAWLING. ST ANDREWS BAY. 1886—1895. IMMATURE SPECIES . FEBRUARY SEPTEMBER DECEMBER 1895 1891 3 SPECIES Grey Skate.. Thornback Starry Ray Sandy Ray Herring Cod Haddock Whiting .. Whiting-Pou' Lin Sole... Flounder Grey Gurnard. Catfish .. Sand-Eel Sprat Flapper- Poor Cod SHVEGU CE 5 rrcaid crocuececee er] tia -lol 1 rs ) &ll-ll- bes A one elleaale-l |G oo wll lta ell ll-F-1 Grey Skate TVhornback Starry Ray Sandy Ray Herning Cod Haddock Whiting Whiting-Pout Ling Long-Rough Dab Turbot Brill Plaice Dab Temon-Dab Sole Flounder Grey Gurnard Cathish Sand-el Sprat Flapper-Skate Poor Cod Monthly average per Haul 71 |387 764 | oo a UNSALEABLE FISHES. SPECIES MAY SEPTEMBER |1890}1892 1895 1 5 5 3 1891 Goby ...... Lumpsucker Short-spined Cottus Butterfish ....-..-... Five-Bearded Rockling Montagu’s Sucker —j|2 I 2 (Pahl) ae I ) | Pal [iecoees wee rou l lon ® et ial ite flat Pl is) pees DECEMBER Avyerge SPECIES Angler Skulpin Armed Bullhead Goby Lumpsucker Short-spined Cottus Butterfish Tive-Bearded Rockling Montagu’s Sucker 1891}1892/1893)1894, Peso 5 35 | =< aa 2 =| =. INa)h Salis 15 = = 1 I 4/—| 1 2 1 2 ri |e Ss Sb Bash ay) po = —|1 1 =| —=)}—)} 8 — | 20 20 It 7) 4 | 11 —|7 4 —| 2 2 I a 9 = = 2 Se | Sea eS Saha =: 5] 6 2 3 5 6} 44] 1 | 10 We |G eb Se || | ae Se = ee | ra en 30 46 |ig0 | 8 [34 [seal se ee FEBRUARY 1891|1892|1893) 1894) Totals Sith sol ke |p —|1 Fl es Peel ee 3/1]—]1 29 S =) t=) * Hauls of Trawl. a Seg at eas win sae ibaa fit ae NH ig Tt aa pS Wares) reve oir Sas) rh ani a he Y j Ve D dace ee eee an een se allice = aT me haha perk dein ae es ee 2 = pu ee rie oy Repro sae ate ‘ i eee a arr eek ei aan 1 ny Semanal el Te: HEPA ena 1) Se vaabtir PMUKoy Se cea ae = im nlm om $ : Dy Ove. ] Shey a te fe > Sos = a ae ne CA Ol Ae * a ae i Se a ee eS “ek z 3 A cies ~ 5 gto > . on Te ; ig ee. Tf 3 ; he Se ieee j 4 5 =~ ' } as-- 3 H *poye[No[Vd SUOT}E}sS [VUISIIO sUTU 94} ATUO S6gI—9gg1 LiL P6er.) errs. hoc. VSE1 617s) O08) Stas eft | eri. ine gol IZI | VII | [eo], uo [nezy aS ae | jod ‘on osvIDAY o6£ Lzé 6S gs 99 L9 Sy oS zl z9 Vespa On zO br |s[neppjo‘oN [RIO], Lvv Iv 6z SE zv ro cee fe AS LE bb of ze A CE |snep{jo‘ON [RIO] eee S68I—16g1 o£z Liz Del 2 OSes SGeae VGe_| vob bie | Lee Por | OO | Zit 2¢t.|, SZr | |ejo 7 uo. [neTy Lov | | jod ‘on osvisay zb €€ i — 9 6 6 6 — 6 6 S 6 € S681 SZ lz bb S 9 _ 6 6 = 6 — 6 6 6 9 b6g1 1Z €s ev 6 Uh 6 8 Peete ol 8 6 Zz 8 g £6g1 96 6 oS ai Z 6 6 — | 6 6 bis, sees 6 6 6 ZOQI 66 6S LV 6 6 II [res a OP ae 6 VI v Z 6 6 1681 Qo | 068I—9ggi olz Sot wie | 220d |= OFe. | Gets CLG Obs. | Or | 2100 20 Ig 69 [ejo], uo [neEy i aa OS jod ‘on oseisay OQ oll QI 6z 1S Sz S¢ oI S€ gI gI gI QI 6 |sfnez{jo-oneioy, ofz of ev 6 yh 6 g 9 L — 6 6 6 6 — 06g 6L oY Sv — 6 6 -~ ZI 9 6 6 6 6 6 6 6881 06 vE 9I 6 L 6 6 8 — 8 — — — — --- QQQT oS vz — oe — — 9 6 6 _— — — — — L981 vz IZ 9 — 9 v S vo € 6 — —_ — — — QI ie.-e IIWIB A JOPOD| ‘99q | ‘AON | 1300 | ‘day | -sny | Atnf | ounf | Avy | tudy | yore) ‘qoaq | ‘uef pets ‘spotted €9 ‘S6g1—16g1 ‘spomed VE ‘o6gI—9QggI HLAIOd, gO. WIA NI SNDIMV AL «CNV Lay 2» ie | SOUP MECE:AAD om $ a lal OBS a ; t r * . ae “a F a te mn then 8 j ‘ ¥ te AE ae or" Sig: Secon rt = : — Sr ee nl a ed Ce VON ail Sa - gzz | pL | Sr LZ | 9v _gzz SHE ANOne a} Ol Sgz | gf1 | Lt for | ¥L | £6 691 | br Gzi Iie | gv | Zor ergata | 6g1 EO On |) er Ol | Os i920 CLE ore || Set Og Gi | oon a|8| ¢ Eis es io) i TAVE] wad AOVUAAV ‘aHvVIOAV TeTUUIDIq, + ‘UONRIS Yous je advioav yeruuonbuind) ,, 06z off GgQE 6re 9c VIZ €oz Szz gif 61! gIz QSE 961 LGA ogz6$1 Sor gz6z11 br | gof oofzor| zbiee 9S169 Sr | 6L1 oLSoz | o19€ | 09691 || gz | VOI WelGl | cecy a ore ciel Orc lone 1OVGe TLcel |Oolvt |i Loss| cle ofLo1 | zbel | v6f6 ZOU | ret zIOgI | Lgov | SzfEx || 9g | 66 og69S | zizf1 | gov || oz | 261 Crag eatoe si esOul || Ggt-|-O0r goltr | LgLi IQ611 || zor | 12Z1 7600, | zor «|8209 || ver | Sor TOO ss leZeote eLSer zbe | 6bz 96gS | Lbz1 | 6bob ob | tI eh 4 -) ce Se | ele | er in @ STVLO], OUI Weg | Cue Lieu Genel Lice Cie (Sgcc dere. Iie etie 0c | iy Ive | vzt | obv | goz | ggz Cin telOul Sec moog Gee |sloe Vos Tay | "ele | sec | 00 | ore CD See | Ort | Gg | aor |o2oc $6 | vor | gbz | 602 | 961 | zz CCIM Vie OCS | gz Cit Vier Oomel: vie All) | 2OVin ciacawea. ome fen Kola rates Vote TOV | VOe. 1: od,4) Zol-| Gon. | vo? | &zv fees WANs eee Nag hocAGI Pes all INV], Wad WVUAAY UOTVIS Yo ye (a[quvaresun puv squares) S6gI—9ogeI Lid, S6g1—16g1 Ler S6gI Su V6g1 IZ £6g1 96 z6gI 66 16g1 gol 068I—9ggI olz 0681 6L 6881 | 06 888! Oa L981 vz O8gI ie STAVH UVAA 106K TOO. NGL SN AN ALL ccc uhala ave bel Niaeaova i cae Total Halibut Sea- | Zeugo- Trout | pterus Total | Total Pollack | Sprat (1) (4) (11) (5) eel ake ee (15) (12) (24) ae (60) 4 (13) tn) a (2) (2) (1) ZB 87 14 IIT TABLE X, “GARLAND’S” TRAWLING. FRITH OF FORTH. AVERAGE PER HAUL (OR TOTAL NUMBERS) OF SALEABLE AND UNSALEABLE FISHES IN EACH SPECIES. | | ere Total | 1 | Total Total | Total Total Total Total | | | | | eee ifr ; : { e % L b ~ : Sail- S | Thorn- | Starry -| py | Green ey More y Year Plaice, Dab Dab Gumard Fluke aug back | Ray CAG] AD Cod Herring fish ae ) | f | | 16 p. h. | 1886 | 39 | 29 (455) 10 = (36) = (3) = (1) = 47 p- h. 1887 73 48 (r129) 15 = (60) (4) (9) (1) = (32) | 17 p-h | sss | go | 24 | (888) 13 = (56) (67) | (14) (7) (3) (12) | 11 p. h. | 188 | 42 | 21 | (1063 ) 13 = (92) (91) | (23) (38) = (35) | 9p-h " ieee socicaes| es) 9 @) (168) (108) | (30) 9) = (60) ) = { 1 | |Totalforfive} 4, 27 | 4306 2 (2) (412) (270) | (79) (75) (4) (139) (1) = | years | | == | 10 p. h | 48or 3s | 33. | (1135) pes (2) (218) (133) | (31) (58) (2) (20) (3) = 9p. h. 1892 | 28 | 27 | (951) 19 i (128) (160) | (32) (82) (18) (54) = (1) } | 13 p-h 1893 35 | 37 | (ass) | 15 (4) (103) (113) | (23) (51) (1) (17) = = | | 12 p-h. | 1894 | 36 | 43 | (Sox) 9 (2) (130) (63) | (11) (58) = (25) (1) | | 13 p. h. | | 1895 | 44°| 36 | (rors) 14 (2) (113) (80) | (29) | (63) (2) (11) (2) i - : 1 Total for fiv | eeu ue 35 35 ) (5250) 15 10 692 549 126 312 23 127 6 I | 1 | , Ree ten | 37 32 (9556) 14 12 1104 819 205 387 27 266 7 I Average for | e : — _ = Ist five years| 47 27 | 15 x2 a 5 5 | ea ara] Average for pas 5 « = — = =, = Gad prove 35 35 | ay 5 a ae ee : = : " E : i in. “4 ae aes ae Ce Y ty: i » facie Scaler priya Raa bjdevreses in ai mee steyr wicca ier 6% A vi Oe hi Cy. Pe 44) het " : ‘ é ; me. i rey ae 6 f heel Cs sy y u A ee — a et i ty es Sa Nies Rc 2) Maen! en al ine fiw sal a es li pe eg Ce | EY ah f ha a 5 Wane aa: x - Leh ee ble Bh | , ‘ae ie Libyan AAS: 4 f % : aialt ‘ ees i esig ong : By oo sp ege te ae Va) | a ED. © Dwi i sso Shab et eR Seah hoc fen ay Ra Ye ce whe aL Rese Noe Sere naling ve vera: ae Elie »f eac peck llée6s = ooe) — mon WOoOWOuON OO Oo Aeon seal (oy) N aw TABLE XT. SALEABLE FISHES. “GARLANDS” TRAWLING. FORTH. (586—1hos. ls SPECIES: wEU RE | owe | buy | Hane | 2S Immature Fishes JUNE | JULY 1 q 1 i) T f Tora) sol 7] ss885) 1805 885 8508 8g of ota S8 85 888 yl | Bay] roa | a 88908) 8511 89 1885850185084 ipa 890495 Toul 9 = |sjols|ol=fololilol=| a Is f=l|—jel7 lala GET = i= 2 7/0 A= Tlie {=| 3 3/=| 7 1 = a aS 7 rf} char aya) —)— i} = j=) 17 3 3 1 1 Se i He ped bat GES iS Che = u 2 H 3 3 =|= 2 alo == 7 == |= G 4 ve 2) 5 x = 3 2) = =| 1 =-|- 2i\4 = 5 2 5 3 3\=| 6 = ne 213 Bes Sy SNe SNE |r =| SS 2 Sl=}= = | 3] 2 = =|= =|=)= =|= BS SS) S) SSeS 31 =|=\= =l=|= 19| S 3 S)=)e4] 71 3) 3 to 7| 4 15] 6) 6 = 1 al) aN = 49 = a= 33) —| 139) —}—/ 45) =] 9] 6} 10) 36 S| = ls Ss 222 ub | 22 | 34 | 10 | ay es a eae es 2 = eles # = S|] =] 33 |tco | sz | 47 fo | = = = 74 =} at] 6 | 75 = 48) 76) — |= 16 |=) ty] —| =| @2| = fsa5| 28 | 72 list 1” + —|- -— =|-j- 7) a = Seis alee = =| 6h 1) — = = =}=| fro} a} 3 = = = = —|i0] 1] ‘2 = 1 = =|= ==] on =) —8] — 1) 33] 2 i at =l=\-— =\)-|- i 5 18, j=} s8)1 7s © SS ee 26 | 11 | — 63 279 | 78 | 72 | — =} =} 42 | 37 jr} 75 | = = = 67 — 305 | 77 | 2 = 1s = 169 | = 72} —| 680] — | — hs | — $3) 16: },60) 7 r SS Sf=|= =|197)| 1} =|—|22| 13) =)— 10 =|-|- =| 10) — =} = fist fs] — =) =} 43 jo7s [216 71 G3 | = = = = Sea = 4 = ad 5) STE a pet Sp py (sd et 3 9 == 1— = =\= a}— 1) =j=] 7) 1) 6|=— — =—|=|- =| 2}=— =|—|=) |= —j=] 3) 2) 3s-f=]— = - 7) = =| = j= = 18 | — =) tpi) = 4(=] 2 EJ ss =f-i- =|-|=— Bi 1) 6| 6} —=|=] 39) 78/25) — 36 = ies 6) 7]— 0 |106 | 97 | 35 | — =| =} 40} 89)! 66 | 18 | ay | — = = = =} 64 | 67 | 53 = 7 — == =! 39] —| =| 114) 2 27 =|=/- =f=|= | 3] sl — S| }i7 53) 39) x = 35 a4] |= = ac =| =o fee | 7 jg) 74) = = = = = {609 | 79 [113 = p23 | 45)| = =\= 759 6s 43 18 at at oh ES te es as A UE 34 ee)! Sa hee efi SNS | 0) ile S| fsa EEN pe = = = Sez eas) pe = = = =|=- = — }—}=)— }=}=l= S| St =)=)=|=)i)=/=|= = = = = == 1 == = | = = = =| | | ie 1 = 1 3 1] 2 4 Ae 7 { 2) 1 i ri 1 -j- — z}—j—| 1j— rh 1 | = = = =a] Pa te mies = 2 = SS Sy ee |g Hs fad | ]=255ih a lio al alae ra 6 Beabaihrad lis! 5 allz = pr im == = SS FoR = I=) @h=l|=lal=| slialalao|= is) 4 S]e) 4} 4x oe um Zi o7) 9) SlSj= [59 3) a=} 5 9 | 32] — = = in = =lnj= = = 3 \=|= = =j=4 = i= =|=)2\= = BIS =) 08S Syatie i= auf 7| 4fel alas) 4 =|=|= $18) 315 = =e 4 = = = = peed eat esi ieaitrcal eats a ms = = = ; a l= = S/S) 9)}l20| 581. 9 = =l=] s)=}u2| 9) 7) 6l 7 74) 23 sr] jah6 tee) 35) 71) 4 32 | — —|38) 5423) 4) 33 | 4) 72 SSS) 4 yas any 1 =| — 155 97 = 20 a = 85 | —} —| s5| 78 | 82 jaar | 33. — RS 37 = 153. 326 || | — = § | — | 16 | 60) 35 | 24 6) — =| =] 33] =] 78 | 55 [1431] 40) 73 4 =|= =\|=)= = faz) = sab =|=|aj= Sf=jHirj=jrie SE ]H13 1 1 = = = = SSS SSS ates = = = = = t s}—|=— = ==) 2) p= 1\)= ==] =]=|SprJ=te] = GE Fase] ae fee 33 peal td ss S}ealsl tS) 3) =!— ys fe et a ea = = = = = | =—|=|=)/—=J=] 1J=]e - = = — = 1 s}—j— = Sf =f =u) re =|= —{=} «{=]=) s}=} 2}= ie St lel lara S|ejatclabe Melets| sl=|=l=lalelals S|E\=I 1 Sala A = Sle aial= ; = i he ie = s 3 eles = l= tee et l=] elles alae temeal ies Or [105 = 675 1140 4 183 = = fiaz | 76 243 1 15h SS Se 32/31) = S 2 = i = =} 187 |! 143} =| = = a oz = 170. — 272 = = a i Wha ae ats = SNA Bin Altra es SS SES rol Bae ey | bes ee 3 (055 | = 90 | vo |S) i Sto) a hs 135 Ee ite ee = = = ie Sees Hog [38 ik oS $ 6) South) 6/28 | thr es apes} SHSf=|'s) a 1=lsq—]oa} = a ey a AS SS Sa eiss = = =n} SS = a = = = {= = =| 4}— Sls = ia 26 | 57 33.) 18 BIR Bs el etic s Los 3s 93 | 38) 38 630) — El=|@ ny 90 = A = |= Sinn == 5 [45 = 3 4 6 | 30 [249 | 236 353 6S | 65 |120 158 74 [58 33) 167 | 43 | 22 | Or 8: 36.1 33) ES ars 3813733 33 32 | 74 5/33) 19} 55 | 32) 43 jor 145 35 205 185 — 94 {197 | 8 173 7 |t0a 339) 8s [159 oy 97 21s 5946 45) 13) — =| =} 23] =] 30)sa] 2) 15 as a =e oS be Se) Fes Se Ss eee on eat = 3 2B pt ee) 2 a = 98 s | ie Be eal earl gay ties 2 3 | ay Sy a ae oe ea tee pe a a Pe EH FS 1 IS =\- Sag B05 af i ais | = 4 | 30) aa 2 9 = 2 es alt= 2 3/=)a s}—| 9 mi) —|= 1 = =|= =l=\3)/=1= SSS aN] SVelalSi Ss} GS i)= = = == = =| 3) 3! sta —fas =\= a) 1 | ar] o 4 3 1 = 5 }alt 6) —| 2) 1j—]— > } =| 4) 1) 16} rj/=]— fi 29 || —| — = — =|= =|={=|=i= == =| Shaye aS =|=|=|- =|= = =)=)=/=- =}=)=|=) 2) 2}S]=) e]= Z|=h=} 8} <0] 6 at She oz) 4g 55 | = = |= =) | 57 = —|=|=} 27 | 63 | 40 Pullers 2} 49 | 86|—| 63 | 63] a78\|—| =) 22} =]98] as) 28] a8} az ]a7 | 85] —|— 7 4 =}4 =lalisy als 117) = S SSS | alSlels = = SSE = SS a= =) 3/=] =| = |=) 1s | 26 | a2 j—j=j— ls) 8 St - 53 |toy - 35 = }—|—\ or faa | 74 = tip | 75 x2 | 47 = bi} 74} 816 || 09 | 45 | s2|—] 13 93) 116) 68) 47158) 7 | = 43 a =)3 =) 8] } 2) =} 1) s}= SB a ahs lle S32 S655 Pes ft Fm Pal cs Fe) FeV Po Se Pag Fe JEG eae se 92914 AS SE ES ey ce ee eV = SS les) BEN ht ay YE ee ee EN IE fe ED a le =i ete) Se = saics SiS) 2/2) SS) 1/25 =|S= |Z != 1-1/2 1/2 1= -|= = S\8|2)2 =)=)=}= 1) ahs |—j 2}a Sete teailis SlZl=| Ss) a) a {= == Ss) | a = a a {a}= 7| sl—|=l=|=l= = =} 2) =|=)=|=J=J=|=] =} 2 f=) 2hZ)= = = =|= SIS|=/=|=/=]=1=]= =|=|=]= 2) =| 3\— = 3 S) 7h) 4 = 2) ire b's es S112] 3 2S ERA S)=) 6) 8413) fas l= S||S =|=} 20] 6 = SSe | =|3 2 [ears] Ses ed = = 1 ee =| =|-|=) -—#-|= = — =|2 =|) 2) SONS Shel SiS SS = Ss ee = = =|=f=|= = |= =|= -|-|- =|=—|=j=l-|-— =|=l=|—]=|]-|-j- =|= =|=|—)— — Beee =l = =| 2f—|-|=]-|= = =| =)/=] 4/=|=-]=- =| =J=l-| ay z= = = =| = SES lSla= ==) = =j=|=|=j=|= =|=/=|= =|=l=/=)=l= =|=/=|/=}=]= 3S) 2) SSeS = 1]= SEES S HVS =\|= SSS Ee = =} =)=/=/=/=l= =} =|=|=} -=/=J=|= = =|= = SSl= = SESS SSa2ee SSS lSy SS Sees bee | at fe nt Se, EES) = (S= === a= 2 SESS ASE Ss HiSHeessssSeaeseseee = = SS == a | el ES ses | as SH aS Sy Sa l= 1 = = =|= 10 == 10 2 = = { i N08 | 107511685 1303|1658) — |18yy]ix32 = | = roSslar97) 1660) 842) 406) i ies fh | jae j] i ! | [| | Total Average * No. of Havls. Se pend a os we € pe a Pa 4 ne ar ia nea ied Od f : ; ae 5 { i by Bae , : ' a th i 7 a chy Ties ie ane | Lr - 4 ye ie, t ‘ a i ae? Pi eae tie w> t os ia t if Pane qed por barren tia He. : “pe ae i > ; eae co e a aie me er | t a> oh. ac em Hoe me ah | i it: € me fy Us ry, rt He Py t ow a RAIS )-aiacl (as cy H a ee Sate ys aor ae Be : eu 8 i ns 4 * recat ge te Sea a A bene Bes i ¢ bs t i ; 4 wo Be eH P f ine, i Ae ' 5 od eo 4 ' j oe D Me 4 & aan rg t fa i alae tains era ere as am Me i : ; ef 4 | \ z i ee = Ke 3 t oe \ } 3 wh Uh i : he Asa ER 4.4 Smeal, ‘Me t z eee Ps SS t q Le ess 4 s * a ie ‘ " ts . i ca ee Ome me ry ee ad ae 2 Pe jee saunas tied it RN ol leas ~ a , ~~ ae it te *3 : perv Vee an hee a 1% Poe b o +f Le ae H ’ d F y + ; Ga cing Saget tg Py = Y G a DECEMBER 1891|1892|1893 2 4 2 355 36 651 |296 | 1894 taps) 5) a al ays —j|}—| 2 — 2 I == game ae es 3 —— — 81 | 16 I 40) | = I 86 Te I =, — 72 |175 | 59 1a a Wee a a I I = 214 | 94 Totals 2015 Totals DECEMBER 1511 89011801|1892118031189411895 GNSS 5 ol ies aa =a |) ea ae ee | Za | dg ape au), 20: | 2 ae. rj|/—/}—] 1}— Dee ane (fe lee “21 ee (ie See ea | ED eee py 2s hoc Beaman eo |. 7 EG am PF Ors fb ES Brassie? SPECIES Grey Skate Thornback Starry Ray Haddock Whiting Whiting-Pout (Bib) Coalfish Hake Ling Halibut Sail-Fluke Craig-Fluke (Witch) Long-Rough Dab Lemon-Dab Sole Flounder Grey Gurnard Bream Catfish Flapper-Skate Sand-Eel Sprat SPECIES Frogfish (Angler) Dogfish (Tope) Zeugopterus (Topknot) Skulpin Armed Bullhead Rockling Greater Weever Goby Lumpsucker Fatherlasher Lumpenus lampetriformis Liparis vulgaris Rockling (Three-bearded) Rockling (Four-bearded) | Total | of each Species Total of each Species Average per Haul of each Species 717 1°55 "009 ‘OO1 2 04 ‘Ol ‘OI ‘09 ‘OI ‘04 "008 ‘004 “O04 “OO! : % sad | TABLE XII. | { “GARLAND'S” TRAWLING. FORTH. 1886—1895. IMMATURE FISHES. FEDRUAKY MARCH APRIL | May i JUNE JULY | AUGUST | SEPTEMIER OCTOBER | NOVEMBER * j DECEMBER | — 2. = Sit ee = a eee ] Tale a 1 1 i} ; ; | —— 5 —— w. i 18218 4 oxasl 6l | 1858 1886] R089 893809 elt 1892 1893] 801895] Toate | 86185] 4891188918] Soul Boal t8o5]t8a4)895| Tota | 86 611+ 892{ 1803805 {1885 1886] 69018] 8oa! 1893 [$4895] Toa | 1856 1887 [rss 1889] al 1895 |tSa4]n895/ Toute 1868578 8S] 1801895804185 Touals1556 18; 5511850] 180911891{189211893)189311893 {11830 18911892 1893118411895) Totale SSH SPECIES f ‘ 889) Bed ( IL I i ( eA Es i i (Bee thes! 1135) tat} 1893118931194] So 189941891 [1892118931 854} 18s) TSSHIISS7 }1S92)1893)18j]1895) Torals == S 5 S\=|=l[slololo}s! ola] SS Sinise o\a! slo lols | si) —|=(=\o jo |milay x =o 8 = S|=lS\7 lolol l= 9 Su ff za fist | 231] 65 [fo) | = fine [99] [Siol=lslajo|slololo 4|—lo}olo}m) os) o)—i6 7 s|afotr hy [ett set —|= | aa SSS SS Sc so SSS se Sil = She =P = ; Sara 1 SSSqeqe Hels SSS eStSsesent | j\a j= 2 2 (esi 1 4 2) 4/2 4 =f Sa ey Grey Skate == SS 3| 6|= ={=/=|= 1] 2 15] =|=|=|=| 1 Z =f=f=) = af =) =t=) =| =) 2)=/=!=]= Ssh r=) a} 4) =) == 3/—|=| =| 2/= 4 = Sia SHEN SS leanne etme taailin | HUSH aN eS ies) SNS ISIS 2 H=}=|4)= lel Salas Sls == AE t=} 5] $}S| s[=| a1 3]E]=] S|ElE 4 (a Shale | fi fe ft acd fc | 6 Thombaik ===) S/S SS le SiS Af Sips (SSS SSeS =|=|=|=/= =)=|={S|=\=|=|=!=|=!= S/=)=l= =| — =) 2/24) S22) SSE 2 2 SS pf) 2G PS fe et 3 Shela) Sy eg | |] 2 a CO ey fa = 3) 9) — 2 8 a gees | it fo toe se Se). sa ed) SO SN SS Sl] (St Sl=]= = = =| 2/— =/=|7/—| s|/- Ss) = a SS SS) = = 4 ff | ts} — 2] —| —|—] —} 33] 16] — 7) an} —| 2} 7 S =n ms) 25 =) =) =Ha5 35(—]. 4i| oo —| t= 1) =| =} te] =] az = = efi a fee | ea tp Ff fee Fe eS | — 6 fies | $2 es == 23| 1 | 3 [ish [sea y =|=|3] 2) wo) 1] —\9 [ang 3 =} $9) =| i186) = 00 |= =|= 244 | = favo | 1821 |] = jtosz | 4] =| = 3616 | 6 [133 983 7 l=} x SS = in| 47 [16s [use| Sat Oh bcs od Sil 74) 30) 7 i = 33] 13 | 92 35 4| 39] 12 | 62 | aes 40 143 22) 2 Cal} 9 6/ /= 26 | 33 2 te 3) 7 62) 12 iS | opr uf | 5 =l—|45 ml—} 5 B St)35 tof — | 8 5h) 45 y =}=|=/=|- = =}=J=|=!=|=|=|= =|=|= =!=|=|=|= = oe) Sg ss == =)=|= = =\=) = =|=|= =}=|=|=|=|=)2]=)=\— f = z— ={=l= = = = = SE) =) S24 2S SS SSS rasie= =l=}=/=|=)=)=] = |= SSS 1} a} | = l= =f=|=|=|=|=)=\S 15 |= he zs S]=}= =) =|-J-}-]-|-!-]-|-/-! -}-]-|-]-!-]-|- =f=) ==}=)=f=)=!=)=t=)=) =) =a) H=)asal- =) -) =) -f-) =) 2 ]=l=l-}-J=) 2 - = SS lS lS Sa =) HHS) = = —!| =) |= | ul S420) [so ea (FF |S ESSE \-]| = SEES EE! Slee elcli=) SSeS Se S2S= Ss S2ceesetee aeeeeesee S|2/=|2/S|=| Z/Z/E| Sl=| SIZ/=/EISIE = SESE =|=|= 5 “eS SSSI SS) - SSS SSSR Se) Se aS eS = s2) sSeessqeeese eee seeseeeseeeeeecs SSS sles =\2) 13/52 2/2/22 SENSIS) = S!SiSie|2 25 Jes 5 Ale SS) =) S| FS easel =| =)=fa)= laf =l=l t=) =] =I = =H] SH SIE Jalal Hh =J=l-)=l=!=!=)=lela! =!=l=l=l=)='=/=)s!='6} =! le lslel-lei- = =) SSNS l=) fy Sa ft Ft = SlSlSh= Sal Slat = SS) | —|=l-l|al— 113 | 95 | 39 | S2 =| =| —] 36] 20) Ss [ass fas 1 58 | 732 |, —| —| —] 29] 58} 37 [186154 7] 75] 556 \) —| —|—} 24) 59) 17 sz | 67 | 99 [ts8) 476 |) —| —] —] 72 se 228 | 796 hs 2356 | 43 [132 | — ‘80 [107 | 90 j=} 45 | 39 1s [194 | 194 op Se 98 [205 | 67 | 49 — | 154 49) tig aks 115 292 [109 93 \= 44 | 70 [148 325, = uo —|4 | 46 } Ley p Rough Dab 5 es Se a SJ =)=)=] =| ==] = f= f=) =) =) ==) =) JH Fale) Hs) == l=) =) elle Jal Hh alelele=l=lelei= =) ===] 1 ==) =)=/- ={=)=l=/=|=| = SPSlElSl=lSj=! Sele =|=)=!=)- )=|=]=l=}-!= = =|a|=|—|=\=l=\=|= | oe 08g eF ao" Be Bees eee ees ele Seeeeeee ee eee] seee See eeeeeeeeee SAS 4 alae ee eee ee pees ce ee 2 Seger cee 4s eseeeae i ea | | SVSi= SHE 2/3/— = S]=|=| a} a=] SE} |=} 36 o) a) el—=(=|=15t a Sains = Se i (BIEN belcind S/n) a9) — 149 || =| 427 | = Sal =| aryl a|e 27 |=!2 58 Se ey bre Ae NS ae PT al Eas lie ua S55 | 18 4] 3] 8} 35 |a2|39| 8 | ato 1] 7|a5|42| 6 iss | 16) 260 | 9} 20) 30] 30 [18y [145 | $7.| sos 1a | a8 [6 [265 | 75 | = [105 Si liao [rat | 98 | — [asa 187 G 79 |147 |312 {205 | 408 83 | = | 201 (1B (166 ag 524 g59 fas 410 | 75 700 336 }= | a5) 60 fiot 503 47/75 — nag toy) ax | —| nn ty | 72 26 8) Mice am 3 1] 4 a) ex 9 4] 9]—j}ro]—j} 33 = 1}19) 2}a5| 5| 62 10 | 82) 2 1 0 1 $2! — = 7} a 08 48 104 jas 2 39 9) o4 ! {2 S16 3] 4) ja} 2i—F 3) gri} goj}—|—!| alist}! 8} 6} Lemon:Daty aes =|ijalale] 6 = Sate y SSS 2 a|S= eS EM t= 7a |=t= 1ia|—)— 2/2) wie SSS i = = = =|=)= =| 1=lS/ =} Sh = Sea ial e Find =| pe era PS fo ak oS hdl a el Sate | = | =| Si = bag stan| = 8) =|= =) is plus = #6 )19) =| 06) Shisn 52/65 | 0 = |=} 10) 2/6 he) | =|=| a0] =| = Syl |hees |= 9 |= las | Ell iel3s|a2 tet alispirile peer | | | = =|=}=|=|=!=|=}=) =$=)=]=|=)=]=!=)=!=)=) =) =]=)=\=)=)-)-)- j=} =yajaialelef=/e =) - =|=/=|=|=/=\/=/=|= =f=)=/=/Sl=) =|=/=) ==] = =\= = =|-)=/=)=/= =|=|=|=|=)= pl ee = Tat SS |5|S|= = SSiqee)s) sigeeleale eel SSESSeese sa alse SeSeSee a) Tenssseeee FSIS (=| Sreleleeleisiet= SelSie lee SSS = =k a\= ey Fe et | es | ae SNS Sp ec ie Pt = =] E| ht ea = = =) ee =|=/=/=/=|=/=|=|= = | |e | |e al a (a ee | SS S| Ste = = al pal Fy Pe a QS) S| = Ste] he eatin =) 5| ele = SS SGS Els) Wesel] css) assess eqseercSescessnFbemesanseeana SES EEE! SIS/2) Sl=) SSeS SEle === Stele S| 5/38 BES 1B 9 a 2 == lee = = Tenses Seerseth see SeSesbeeebeasteieeaearetes S|2} 3) 52/32) 4) Sf =|a (===) SJql=) 2 =] =l=| i =ElElel =} SS Senei =|E\=|E/E'2 =e) =|) 3} -|=|= jala Tale? — |e @ = | 52] 92 |206 su “6 i823 [iss | 208 |] —| — | — | 46 |t73 35 | 07) | a18s |) =] = | =| 46 [oor [156 (643 i538 |z6r | 1925 |= =e Tos 365 |4S0 [S31 468 — 672 331 |1629)195 [261 | — |s10 fist series | =|= 74 [254 topo |i93 | = THO 4982 | — lata7 [ato 1430) 551 fas tes (S979 Jtovae | 202 [zone 4 | 7 3876 [36 60% [| =)]/78 fs3 16) Fe0y 345989 |= {28a | 497 jas] — | 21 |170 [38 Iss3 ‘a bis [2% | =| —|@ |= hiss (8 65 ps pa 94 | 2015 i d te | | t | J i i i | ! Pek | | = = — = =a : © Nomber of Hauls: = =| UNSALEABLE FISHES. 7 JANUARY q “| FENRUARY MARCH. APRIL JUNE JULY | ‘AUGUST SEPTEMBER { OCTONER NOVEMBER | DECENAER Ava ~ = Z } =e : i BT ees ih Nee = snows oer Ht i ee i ie leeds) | : Fate | eleeeal [is Feaaeal es) Py oo 1 ates Taal hae Webel hey SPECIES: of each | oC ett 18 8 8 Ta 8) 857188) 185 851155189384] 1855 ota 8] 1857| $8] 509 181 Sl 8 84595 1557 189018911892) 1893 1886|1857}1888 189181891] 1893]1895] 180 1895) Totals 1 886 1857)1858| 859) 893 185411895) Totals} 1886] 1887 18911892) 18931894 1895) Totaly 1S} 893 18041895) Totals 1886 188p 1888 1$S9 o}1891[1892 1833 84) 189 USS 18851S 18 185 1895180185] Total 618515988} 1892 8181899 Tsay) Species [SPI Sl aiwul—|—|—|o,o)elols|olo| @ |—|-|—/9|ol7]o os = olals|o | Si=lo | @ jE\e 10/9 =) 7 [=SunnnnmeanE = [aps ° 59 7 9|sio 4 [= a) o olinlaol= 6 Tietz) ofatr 6|—|is Slojaju 9 7 mi Sse CSS ie Rahal eS een Steril oathaal lea 7am |=|= Tail uaheai| a7 =i 3) | te) a =\\a 6 =|=) a7 |>s) 35] 9 |=) us | Sl 3) IES 3/25) 58 Say 7 jj s = Sls ofe =| 9s Hlole 9 | Hews vee) mie | gs real ee EZ ey NE ed bs at tS te | 2h See ene SS Sie. pe sae ne Sy i= =) 2) Se SS) =) S13) =|) = See 2 = ais = =|=|=|= =| = =|=)= =} 9 = Si) Vase SSS 5e3eas SE y= SS =) =| Sy= == =>\\= = S| SS |= SS SSeS Seles ey a ie = ==) SS =| =| |= 2) > =| =|=1= S| ejoiere vp knon Tiloreet 3 2/2) 4 SSS 223 SS S28 Gita SNS] 1=) SSS) SiS =| |= == i = =|2 ft S| =) i) sll) 3) S) 6) 8S) SS 5 /Sl= |=) Ble) a) as = il s)=l=|= =| a= |e =) i S)a} aja 4 | Skahp m | i SS ye SS) St are Ss eS ee SS Sra SS a3= aa) S = == = = Sic ate | eanesa sel lls [| SS 2) SSS \) a = =\0) (2! SN= =|1)/=]= END SS esiea lo 2 | Amal tallbe | oe = y=) SA |, 8 (et Rey Oa Nt brane fe Wel Sees Ses pi == Sele|= == & = == =|])2)S SSseseSsseslSssbeSeSstes S SSS iSrl a = SVS SES S255 | eee SS oh eal Sh Jesic=i — SSS SS SER eeeeeeeceege= SlSlele eS ; = API =I= (2) oS SSS Seta lel Sale sSeSeseiaiee SSIES SSele Sie Ble lei = jose mS = = 3) Seals ei Sel ee a) ae SS ANN 2 == = = == Sei S\=)S)= = =) = = Se =) SS) | 3 Tapper i | oo 3 ‘= 3 y ay 2 = a $ Ss SS = Tamper jampetiiomi| "6 |) oe == it = 2 = = i = Lipatis wulgacin y | so rar Ble 3 ims = abs | a SS = la | = i = Reekling (hresbertel)| 3 /]. “eng — =-/—|= )- = = == = =f=) = |= Sh eas | —|-i-)}- = Koekting (Foarbeanted) 1 ‘cor fF Bal [ot ay 7 =li9 52) — 46 | 20 | 29 | 47 1 |=} s3))as) se]a7}a21—| 18) 32) 26) 07 Ivo] 38) 18/—) 00) | 30 8) 35] 24/87 | 10 S| 35 [aa fay) 8) lr] a6 slp slas fo fiy = 106 147 Da] es 1s \ [east Heslige art EAE: ee * Nomber of Haale = Terr i Sas een ne Se aN fi : : t £ ‘3S — ee fe pak, nde inte Wish Bh, talc De ae oe 7 Ah Ee rae viel Phat m1 enntwrmaehla i eubeeet astu hint ae Se ee re GS eee era Ny FHADAREL an ee i mE je aE Die e AREA MER g z € iS 8 Zz € S yO u8 hates ee een | a TIadV di aaes ues 5[e10 L, eee esereees lopsuy SHIOddS ‘SHHSIA WIGVATVSNA UNIX = TEL ‘€06 Juez tod osvisay *€ synvzy jo ‘on (yung ypuus) 11Lz gIg | ZIvVI IgV | 1ST aat II ZGI | O91 Le oz | £6 6z FI 1Z i gZ | oo1 SI i — sea aes (S —— I ——s eee ee t 6 Hk ¢ L6v | 106 bSE ra Seite ZI Gr =le1~ Zz Sea I ecw cee eet ecios ysy yey LOUD 0C20.000 ple urnNr) efepmisteie qed -uowaT ecuttope od Be eaGanon (ad1vy]) pod eee eee eee Avy AIIBYS ao ayeyS Aoixny yO 8 WS TWadadV Sa10dd$ ‘SHHSIA AIAVATVS LS SARL YL SSANHLIVO 20. LSVOo: Aa0 V3gl ‘HLIMNA AVYOW NI ONIIMVUL «S:NOXVS IVAOU» iO : De ee he Py f! te es x ae hth dl pas ROMS . me FRITH. » 1808. TABLE, XVI. : -MMATURE (UNSALEABLE) FISHES. APRIL i ie TES A pale ye 2 a ee oe Fie Sth Sth Sth Sth ME eee 4 5 9 | 30 36 24 6 10 19 5Or i |. T45:a2 oe = an = aad I I g i: a 14 4 8 42 = = oa 2 = os 2 I = — _ = — I 18 == = —— oa = 18 - ce 5 We 7 9 19 40 eae oe i | ag II 2 Gen “ag <2 4 | 79 I I I — 5 — 8 4 Lo i oa “NORTH COASTS TRAW EING OUTSIDE SMO k AViaE Ria Giaeessec: TABLE XV. TABLE XVI. SALEABLE FISHES. IMMATURE (UNSALEABLE) FISHES. No. of Hauls 6. ie APRIL ; APRIL SPECIES | Description SPECIES* T Il Ill IV V VI Totals = I II III IV V VI Totals ae pie | 8th Sth Sth 8th 7 eh eh Sth 8th Sth Sth (Gieyes Katee ermariccsssnns ect — I I = 2 I 5 Grey Skate......... 16 — — — 5 9 30 Codirce st: se ILENER® soonacon | 24 | 24. Starry Ray......... 36 24 6 10 19 50 | 145 ID losis edaened Medium...... | — | 8 2 13 9 4 36 Sandy Ray......... — — —_ — — I I Do.(Codling)| Small _...... — I — 4 5 ig 23 Haddock............ 9 7 — 14 4 8 42 Haddock...... IL EWES sonaaaoes 200 | 284 -| 243 136 249 | 126 | 1238 Wihtitin ore cena — — — 2 — — 2 180 | 134 | 102 201 | 97 1085 Hake si cavesncten I — — — — — I 2 | yf ZG) 484 | 357 | 1808 Wiatchiveretectntnee 18 — — —_— — — 18 9 14 21 19 | 42 117 Long-Rough Dab | — 5 _— 7 9 19 40 a 2 Sail-Fluke 5 _ — — — — 5 — 5 2 2 I 10 Wabi. wencce vente II 2 9 33 20 4 79 i] = a 8 5 52 Lemon-Dab ...... ote! I — 5 _— 8 — I — —}; — I ' — — — I I 2 97 39 16 66 62 QI | 371 IPIEINGS: Gaocoonne I — 6 6 5/ — 18- Sail-Fluke Syibe oll I == II 9 57 JNA caonenanetnoo 14 os = = = 14 DAD steaneeeess 8| — 8 Lemon-Dab 14 Tee 28 LOM eet 45 119 Totals ......... III 39 16 66 62 or | 385 Gurnard ..... 24 — | 53 110 86 | 14 287 EN a Gatfishermenen: —_ — 5 4 2 4 15 : ; Poor Cod —_ 2 — 5 — | — 7 * Six young Cod (small) were liberated alive. - BR OLal Smtr iacrsiedesta seins 993 | 727 | 663 | 641 Im7I | 719 | 4914 | | Aiea Rn wel eben thy Luh A hig Ses oe ed ok ALU RUM AB Lie Pome. a a ois Yalan co SEER | | ve s s : { rm oil ~ ms ' ; : Race 1 | ROU ER gue ¢ NOVEMBER Totals ee ee es || of each Species SPECIES 1|1892|1893|1894 1895 1896 1897) Totals —{|— |—]|]—]| 6 | 6 12 108 | Ee ae eee ee — 2 Grey Skate (large) | SR ees eens ieee = 9 Do. | Re en (ee ea 2 2 65 Thornback (large) Ba en laeraa| a: fe Ss 2 3 5 66 Do. ous) SA eee ieee ee eee — — | Starry Ray ue pally eee aan -— I | Sandy Ray pene (SE lig La I I I Fuller’s Ray I Sree ee Ws fe oe hee a I Shagreen-Ray 3 oe ees 2 22 Cod (large) 9 —|—}|—]|—)/ 46] 19] 65 234. || Do. Oo a ee ee ee 6 | 17 23 121 Haddock (large) 3) —|—|—]|—) 22] 18 40 449 Do. 3 Dae | ae ee ee == 430 Do. (small saleable) cee, | a ERE aca ee ea I 6 Whiting (large) 9 Se el a 4 181 Dos 2 Bem eee Se Weal eo ay 2 127 Do. (small saleable) 5 Ay 9 | ape | a eae ae = 7 Hake od 7) eo ean eras I I 2 2 Ling et ss RN eae) ene eee = I Lythe (Pollack) ne eS ee ge = a Halibut = BOSE ei Sone eee bao — I Sail-Fluke —|—}|—j|;—)} 6| 42 48 || 388 Witch —|—|—|—|—} 2 2 31 Long-Rough Dab (large) —}|—|]—}]— 7. 2 27 \ a 228 Do. — | — | — | — | — I I 6 Turbot ee eit Ss ease tl ae 3 £3 34 Brill — | "| —= | ==. 65) 26 B2 320 Plaice (large) — | — | — +) =| 8 1163 | 247 1678 Do. — | — | — | — | 67 |221 278 3315 Do. (small saleable) | a eal ea I 62 Dab (large) — | — | — | — | 39 |182 | 221 3104 Do. 319 Lemon-Dab —|—|— | —] 10} 15 25 Eo 5 cee, eee eee aes — 20 Sole ee gn ee ee — Il Flounder (large) Bee Free) Oe Ss — 18 Do. (small saleable) eat aie = ee ae ae SG 7 251 Gurnard (large) caesar tee fon te te 7 7 || or Do. EDS AL fee ap if eae ea See — 2 Catfish (large) Se a) ee a Rae ee — I Do. — | — | — | — [299 |757 1056 12630 TABLE XVII. “GARLAND'S” TRAWLING. MORAY FRITH, 1887—1897. STATIONS I. TO VI. SALEABLE TPISHES. APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER Totals ae 2 — - ; ae of ech SPECIES nae | | soslisoel | |1897 H $92}1893) 18031 1895|1896] 1897] Totals | 1887]1888}1880]1890|189 | 1892|1893|1803|1895|1896|1897) Totals | 18871888) 1889]: 890118 893 1894]1895|1896|1897] Totals :887}1888) 18 8 8 Totals||138; 5 887|18 se STE Thches ||) §87/1888|18S9]1890) 1891) 2/1893) 1894/1895) 1896) 1897] Totals || 1887) 1S88}1889) 1890) 1891/1892) 1893/1894) 1895) 1896/1897 Totals |/1887] 1888) 1889] 1899) 1891)1892) 1893) 1894] 1895}1896) 1897) Totals |) 1887/1888) 1889] 1890] 1891) 1892]1893]1894| 1895|1896|1897| Totals || 1887]1S88) 1889] 1890) 1891| 1892) 1893) 189411 5|1 1897} Totals}|1887} 1: 1889] 1890}1891]1892}1893| 1894] 1895] 1896| 1897] Totals ||1887}1888] 1889] 1890) 1891|1892|1893|1 194) 1895) 1896) 1897} Totals | 1887] 1888} 1889] 1890) 1891| 1892) 1893 1894) 1895 1896) 1897] Totals Sa] | = a e 6 5 Si} 17 6 —_ 6 12 6 |— 6) 5 17 6 1} 6 13 6|6|6 is || — — 6/6 6 18 | — | — _— = 6/6} 12 108 : + | ; i cu loreatt | zs aaa Ree =a SE = | 2|— Si 2 - = = — = = —|— — = —|-— 2 || Grey Skate (large) = Fea (Ss = } | — = a 4 Coes = = SSS 3 2 5 Saal (ess = = = 9 Do. | ea | exh ewes oe se pts hae eee ve ENS SR Re ee roe eee > anE 533 ‘ ¢} bs om ie : mar 24 e t F he he ae 2 H e ‘ . Mae “4 ’ ¥ 3 Bs f a { ? é A ae F Dba tens Ve : i t i | ae ae Tee Dyan eee ec a oor Pe ae : bk Fae : i = { ; By. ee ; ie ; I 4 i ae : : . ae f Waase . Coe \. ” i i 6 * b ae ee } if te Pe . nt! aol eg re 5 ‘Cae | of 5 ie nat : J ea". 5 wegen! “4 Saag eer ene ary : i Semone 4 F : (tee x 18g0|1891|1892 189492) 1893) 1894 1895, ——— 2 ees ra Sy Bhd Sar ee Bel et ree ee —— 3 SE aay a. ines Sui 3 Sci Seas es = ess. Ea eos 99) |= 4 Sn) 24 (335 le ee 432 |350 sore Pe : a neg eee sl ; ee ee ee 6 Ss —— — J 3 : ae, i) eee pee 112 |520 |720 2 ical a i SEPTEM)VEMBER 1896 Ped wte le bee | Latest ted Sale| Totals 1897| Totals 12 108 [S@ i So lal ded |e! wl luwadk! lwanal | = (es sex | Westies | [| ———— 478 | 535 || 7233 of each | Species | SPECIES SS Grey Skate Thornback Starry Ray € Witch Long-Rough Dab Turbot , Plaice | Dab T.emon-Dab Sole Flounder Gurnard Poor Cod Solenette Butterfish Pipefish Wrasse Angler Dragonet Pogge Fatherlasher 2 | Four-bearded Rockling ee ee ‘ { TABLE XVIII. “GARLAND’S” TRAWLING. MORAY FRITH. STATIONS I. TO VI. UNSALEABLE FISHES. 1887—1897. APRIL MAY | JUNE | JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER ee i Ser | | al | | Nesdhes eo sh 1898, 18B9/1890)1891) 1892 1893|1894) 1897] Totals|/1887|1888) 1890 1891 1892/1893 1894) 1807) Totals] 1887 1888] 1889|1890|1891] 1892] 1893) 1894]1895|1896)1897| Totals) 1887]1888|1889 1890}1891' 1892| 1893 1801893)806 1897 Totals|)1887/1888 1889) 1892) 189311804) 1897) Totals 887] 1889] 1899} 1891|1892)1893]1894|1895)1896 1897; Totals 88 1888 1889 1890) 1891) 1892 1893 |1894!1895 1899|1891) 1892|1893}1894 1895)1896) 1897 ‘Totals| ; 3 3 a = | SI aS = iPGiee a Ss eg ea| 6 sil fala, || 6] | 3 (6 6 | ee = 6) 6 |= = =| (el | 1 | | | | — | ; = a pax —I2 | | ve] | aa ss | | a = = air coed Coe saiS) =} - joan I ll | | SSeS 2 5 ) 1 2 3 — =| <= —|—| 1] 3 4 i is! = | Je Pet | eal he le et ed heeded zs | ee eles 8 | = 3 = | | = =| =n 1 \— 1 | 2||— = = Sp eel enlie) = =I =e | | =a | = 7 =| 17 |309 | = 309 Heals tas = } = 8 = = eed fear feel ele a aul = = 19 i | —| 12 12) 3|— 3 i 3 = i = @ = = SSS SSeS | = = { | 3 = | = = = = = i | a femal |e | = 7 7 t = | = I = = = — Sail Cassi ant Reatleettis 3 i = = (i | = 9 | | | te eS 16| 16) —| 2 =13 3 34) 4 2 6 1 = =| 29 = = Sh = por cea eae ise MA = tr Pay Si a . as 23 ee, —|-|—}—-| =}. 3 nice = || 18 66 | iS 12! 20 22 S| 19 | =| 99 ||202 292 | 3 | 24 335 362 310 | 5 =a, | ; 6 6 24 88 = Shien ot falas 508 435 les¢ |) =| 21) 997 II309 | — 456 1388 [42 |350 1170 = = |1089 |275 | — = =| 39 j354] 384 Cae : = = 28 |=|= = Pestle 4 |u 1 | \— r= |= We ee epee =e] Oe = | ies) S Sole a SSiz 6 = 6 = = oF 5 | eae = cae —|—J]—J—-/-—/-—} - He = = = | | — ee | =|) SS 6 u 2 2 67 | 20 | = 57) 7 W ) 53 | 16 | =} 80)}) 13 34 | 5 4 26 = | Tae | Pay 3 Se g Poor Cod = | | = { = rat | es | : a Eileen nm —}|—|—}—}—} 1 1 Subte as = aS = | = — — = = = 3 a = futterlis = — | | | = eS | = = = & = = § ai ras Elise BE | st = [aa at ES Pipelish =| |2\4 les S25. === 1|=|=|= i SESS) sl sl= SSS elle Xngter = 4 3 Paull 4| f Bs 3| 9}—| ea 6 7 5 Wa 10 ay 8 a= uy SS \\o = B55 Pad | = = = 6 6 obs: = ae = Hess ae = } ex = | pea | a3 = = 0 = a = = | | | | =) 1 {= n | = a = a |S es Pm | ee pees = =a y Patherlasher — i — = — — — — = = a = } t— —I|— * | =i =| |=\4 (=| | | = = |=\= = Sal hecellles {ss eee B == Sil all || Four-bearded Rocklin | fame! | ras | ell EE | | =o east = sa om eases ‘a= i—| — a] leeitradl =je |= 8 | —| 50 =|i70 = |=|=|8 {asl S |is2)| 2701) || — lss7 | =| — | — [sre 53s | | ieee 067 |= | — 1150 \yt2 |520 720 1652 = = |1y9r 309 | — —|—| =| s7 jas) 3s { Se) Pe et | il | at Og SOI S6 ZI €QI z61 cll z61 O07 AM 99 eS ZI ZI 9 9 _ gI ZI 9 9 9 ’) aS ca ZI ZI _ 9 ZI II —— 9 ) 9 an ee oLI OLI -— cv zv _ 9 2) Ste a oo 8g! aE: SE 9 9 ee — ) 9 oil = 9 9 se ate aedeagus eos M ‘L6OQI—ZQQ1 Sela OV ioe) Ke) 3 Pritits Het a ie 5 O = ims: OF A SNOLLV.LS I Pitt] 1 | | pisrini] = | 3 | . £631—Lgg1 s[nep] JO ‘on L6g1—Zge1 jnepyT 19d ‘ON OSR1DAY L6gI—z6gI [neFy aod ‘ON OSRIDAY L6gI—z6gI s[nv yy] JO‘ON L691 9681 S61 b6gI £6g1 ZOQI 168I—gg1 [ney aod ‘ON asvioay 1681—ge1 S[NVP] JO ‘ON 16g1 O61 6881 8881 LQ9I Ivo x Hilde AVdOW . ONTIMY GL aSGNV INV) » ele era pies ‘s A i oMag re. ihe Sa ie ae ie oe Ensl aie: Spee Me par LiGrlwetlOz <\ Ose 140) IVEs| SeL1 | OR £9 Oz! 7 Aa fe A 19 z6 Coz | vO pe Coen ieatac. | Viv 601 660 1Sb | 9fV 140) QI v Qeel | ave henOGl |, sO0c lear gS zS1 | 16b | Sbz 69 09 1Sz | Ig ce 1S OL 8 Vel 6S1 US Pe efye “Aste 6z OSE ih Oven (BLe7 oS oLt 981 99 evi OLI TLE Glz ZQT €6€ 661 IfI cre zvs z61 69 ZZI €gozi S19b 3908 | Lv SS z6 oLLi 099 | OI | 98 61 99 CSG n |) eGo 10Z1 OI SS £9 Cong ae SES ogt 1SZ es gLI || +=giot 6Lg 6L1z ZZE 6£1 ZQI bogt 6001. |" Sor £6z ozI ELI €oL1 ozL €vor OLI ZO gol ogiZ Q19z | zoSv o£z Sg ciPie 2 | Peenoem oz | S28 PEI oo 6L gzbvz £66 thai Sol at 16 b£o ore | obS £61 8 ver || -@Sar. =|. sor | orl 19Z IQI OGL ~¢ || “ZohI {| ° 96 009 soysty | aTqveyvsug | seysty soysty || [ejIOL soust yy soysty pue a[qvayesuy)| squares || puvay | apqvotesuy | eTqvales a1 qeaTeS SNOILVLS TIV LY TAVE] uaa STVLOL, AOVUAAV NOILVLS HOVd LV (says e[qveyesuy) pu a[qvoyes) II INV wad AOVAAAV TA, OL “I SNOLLV.LS bri IVI A | ihe Ti L61 002 L631—z6g1 SIVO A XIS L681 9681 S681 VOgI £6g1 Z6gI 168I—/ggI SIV X IAT 1691 o6gI 6981 888! L9g1 Iva XK | | | | OO 0 OO sineyy] jo “ONT ‘Z681—2881 HLINA AVMON ONIIMVAL «SONVIAV) » aegis El Leb Maly 6 742 12 6 18 12 66 1887 1888 1889 1890 1801 1887—1891 Five years 1892 1893 1894 1895 1896 1897 1892—1897 Six years Kets A O37 Ol re 38 47 18 30 72 a7 | \ tae | 40 68 174 85 BZ 231 94 | 113 22 62 30 31 45 61 Bees vé io>) [oat ‘- ae ee 1 | om ere Haddock August May June May, July, Sept. September September April, May, Oct. July, October July, August Aug., Oct., Nov. June, November TABI Ow “GARLAND’S” TRAWLING. MORAY FRITH. 1887—1897. STATIONS I. TO VI. TOTALS AVERAGE PER HAuL i No. or : : : SG fee |p cel os} a || Baye PAR Ng | | dea eoeal ey OSE | Boal: le ela ee ical 2 Wie ence aren aa ead st s sie |Es'3| 6 as} = sists Ah cep ey = Bg) S 2) = s co Bo ge ee) Oca | eee ee ieee jellies aaa a emlercs «|S el x | || | ere 6 1887 559 | 370] 42 14 5 | 318 20 182 — | 2 2) 22 |} 1/1} — 7 93 61 | 53 | 30 |) August 6 1888 88 | 201 30 | 132 7 || swag} |) ica 23 Ai = |) = |p ee I 5 4 14 33 | 23 | 39 || May 6 1889 282 110 16 — 5 61 I 125 I | — 3 4 47 18 to | 20 || June 18 1890 542 | 1337 | 20 68 38 75 | 118 155 |—] 1 |—1] 33 5\/— 9 9 30 72 | 4]! 8 || May, July, Sept. 6 1891 222 | 846} 27 51 23 18 18 110 8|—]—I| 49 5 | — 6 4 || 37 | 141 3 | 18 || September | | | 42 ee 1693 | 2864 | 144 | 265 78 | 615 | 292 807 | 12] 4 D2 As | 22 | we || By} As) ao 68 | 14 | 19 | f 6 1892 1049 | 511 14 4 19 59 5 61 | —| 2 2 I 4|/— 14 3 || 174 85 9 | 10 |] September 12 1893 1413 | 1577 | 33 53 29 | 379 34 272 |—|—|]| 2 19 |—|—|]| 13 8 || 117 131 31 | 22 || April, May, Oct. 12 1894 1133 | 1361 74 42 33 123 4 167 | —|—] 7 ri 2a ese lee ssi ter) 94 113 10 | 13 || July, October 6 1895 136 | 375 18 23 5 52 10 65 | — it 4|/—| 18 7 22 62 8 | 10 || July, August 18 1896 548 | 574] 26 54 72 70 6 99 3/—|] 18) 23 I Zao Oha\elOn|| ae 31 2) 5 || Aug., Oct., Nov. 12 1897 549 | 733 | 42 78 45 45 8 140 | —| 2 3) 72 |—|—] 14 | 21 || 45 61 3 | 11 || June, November = ras 66 meee wanes 4828 | 5131 | 207 | 254 | 203 | 728 67 804. BH 2b Se |) tere |) vac | | auepe i aa 78 Wh \p 38] 33 Sin TABLE XM TAAL, “On aA. i, Cea ee. Ib + sah dae oA eee oer sighs py tea ce DLO Lao eon ke ee ee rr cer i haar abet : 5 a eh ‘i ; ) 4 ‘. : e seats PRA Oh etey ce dee SPECIES ee eo a Thornback (large) Do. SCPC a he Fuller’s Ray Sandy Ray . Cod (large) Le oe ON ee Haddock (large) [oA Do. (small saleable) ... Whiting (large) D Ce ee er ea ee i ry i i i ea ee ee i i ee ea LS eee Witch Ce re i iy eee (250 (es . i Se Cle 62 Flounder (large) ol) SRS Be eis ae Gurnard (large) Do a) i ay i | ee ee eo NOVEMBER 1896|1897| Totals |/1893]1894|1895|1896|1897| Totals ON bee DOr st ret Deca 13 1 | — 2\;/—}|—}|—}|—]} 2 2 —— — 2 ——*, ae acs ——a — ——— I | — 3//—}—]}]—] 1] 2 a I | — 2//—}—}]—]| 1] 2 3 I | — Ir |} —{/—|]—|]—]| 2 2 — | — —}i}—}—};—!—] 1 I — | — 4]/—]—}]—h r}— I rm ios Peeler We alc ae, Mew eS ON aaar mmm sel seit ete BERS 55 2|— 19 |} —|—|—]| 2] 13 15 512 | — |} 2898 || — | — | — |188 |105 | 293 SF era eS Name one (eee heey Fe eS 12 a ace 15 3 3 24 |— | 235 ||—|—|—]| 21| 14 16 eat ae 1S el Saracen al rage A fier ial aes) 3 8 | — 13 /|/—}|—|—]| 1 I 2 — | — 7\/)/—}—]—|] 2]— 2 2|— 9||/—|—|—] 1|{ 2 3 BON eet Coes! ha hse a A ea ae I | — rj}—}—}|—|— 69 | — |} 183 || —|—]— 11 ac a 1 | — ri}/—}|—}|—] rf] — — | — rj}/—}—j|—}]—]| 1 I 3) eg 2A Wee beery perme it Uae 5 ea Nori 9S) ad |e | Mira oc a a 34 1 | — 5 —}—il—}—]— _ — | — 2\);—|—}|—|—]| 1 I BOT | ee SO2: a Wo BOW aS le ao Way | eee ae i aa eae hy Ey Om! 79 BAU Pa woo oe re ror hace iro lt oe 36 ZS TAD comme ep eel eo! laa) leary RON PLOO, | re 79 2|— 2} —|—}]—]—|— — 1641| — | 7630 || — | — | — |455 |1204| 1659 Totals of each Species 87 12 WAVE, ORM, “GARLAND’S” TRAWLING. 1893—1897. MORAY FRITH. STATIONS VII. TO XVI. SALEABLE FISHES. MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST OCTOBER NOVEMBER SPECIES Sua Inches 1893]1894|1895] Totals|/1897| Totals |/1893| 1894, 1895) 1896|1897] Totals ||1893|1894)1895|1896|1897] Totals 1893] 1894 |1895|1896|1897| Totals 1893|1894|1895|1896 1897| 1 TOnd i 10 i fo) UO) ji) == |] 0) L | — | — II es 9 aly 13 Io Io | — |} Io | — St | | 4 9 Srey ara (farce) eres. 16— 2|/—|— 2 I i Pf QA =| ep ae | 3 | eee ea 29 | el Meee DO. clea cnsecey .| I2—15 2 2) || | nee a [ee i Thomnback (large) . 19— 2)—|— 4 4}; — |] —} «| — |} — I I ey = Pe 4 el ee D0} -< chase aes 13—18 i I | a | | 4 — I I 2] — | — | Starry Beye ie SPW [tere oe 5 4 4 2 ye 3 5 Sy} Ta | | nee | ee es Fuller’s Ray . II — == I Sandy Ray . 11 = 2 2 — I 3/—|— We I Sh oe pod (large). 23— 2 — 2 2 229) |e 3 I I I 6} —}|—}— W\|| = || =| =|} 2 ys banoansdasmamecouod 8—22 || 62 — 62 3 Si) § |= | — | = 5 | Onl 19 || 41 28 | —} 6| — 75) || = |= ||| 2 53 Haddeck (large) I5— 58 | — | — 58 9 oH} | 3 = | — 3//—}—}—]-—!]=— = |i} wt 31 4 2 |= 19 |} —|—]|]—] 2] 13 WOre tore see fe apses eed 10—I4 ||180 —| 180 |/145 LCS fh ails || 7p |) = |} 172 || — | — 1344 | 43 | — | 387 ||182 |2204 | — |512 | — | 2808 || — | — | — 188 |105 Do. (small saleable) ...| 8—pg gi | — | — OI || 43 43 || — 1475 | 37 512 23 | 16 | — a) [Sort | S54 = |] B= | Gem H} — || — | 7 Whiting (large) ............... 14— 4/—|/— 4 I I 2 2 3); 1] — 4 5 8) 2) = 15 j/ —|—|—| =] 3 3 29 ; WD Ospatecan cnet areas I1O—13 |] 24 — 24 || 4 AW) =H} | nis 26 63 | 16 | — AD NW EN Oy ee as I 14 16 384. \ Do. (small saleable) ...|_ 7—9 3 — 3 i} — == j= 1) 45 | 2 17 20 Zo) |) wre | Ai We We Se) —= | =|— | = | 3 102 TBARS cece oer earner 12 2 2 |) ie |) in 2 2) 1] — 3 2 34) | ney tp ee el 2 22 * x z 3 Crile Nee Ne a 2 10 I I _ = I I = alee 4 5 5 4 4 7 2 9 ||/—|—]—} r] 2 3 26 I = ri} 4 | OFA em | |) St leapt) TO | ae |e] et er |e ge || 49 | 49 196 1} —/]— I I I I | | es 3 6 NE et a My || U2 72 2 2 36 | 22 | — SM ih I oy a I go} tor 433 I I I I I I 3 I == | == I 2 2 if es I I 5 7 |}—= |= | 7 ll 6 6 |/— | 9/—/]—} — 9 5 SP LO ea a a I} 4 5 66 0. 9 = j =] 391 Be BE ago 46 SI a EE fey Ut te Se) | 348 Do. (small saleable) ......) 7—11 2};—|— 2 I I 2} 1|— 3 3 oe |e | | 5 — II Dab (large)...... | T2— 2|—|— 2 2 2 2 — B I I 7 Gre ere of GS 1Oe Weare |] = |) 121 ||266 266 || — |125 | 27 152 174 |104 | — | 278 |l2q3 | 852 497 1592 201 |548 749 3158 j= gn | — | = 51 || 79 79) || — | 69) 2 71 71 | 14 | — 85 ||103 | 86 73 262 == |S Ot 79 627 7—8 —}|—}]— — = ae aes II— 28 | — | — 28 7 TEM = | 2a 2 29 17 | 15 | — 32 || 74 | 120 | — |141 I 6 6 7—I0 ||165 | — | —} 165 ||108 108 || — j150 | 18 168 180 | 45 | — | 225 ||165 295 257 3% — re fap 179 we 33— 1 | — | — I 2 2 — = _ — T= 32) |e = I || 4 4 — — SS SS SS 2 SS = = = = 2 2 — 2 879 | — | — | 879 ||802 | 8o2 || — PGE) | = 2 We — | — jboss || == |) canis} 1566/4423 | — |1641| — | 7630 |] — | — | — 455 1204) 1659 || 13560 * Number of Hauls. ee casita hil = Piha sleet * ¥ “ ane ee ey eS) ee » a . 1893—1807. HES. OCTOBER of each Species tals ||1893|1894/1895)1896|1897| Totals ||1893)1894|1895|1896| 1897 | Totals 10 | 10 | — | Io | — | 30 —|—|—| 4 9 13 87 —| 2}/—|—|]— 24—}—}—}—}] — — 2 —||—]| 1 I 21/—|—|—| 1 I 2 9 — 1/ 4|/—] 1 6}/};—}—|]—] rf — I II — |} —}—}—] 1] — r}}—|—}|—y—-] — — 2 I r}/—}—/}—]|— rj}/—]}]—]—]366f} — I 14 84 |/393 eee Soro ee Se ae ae 6 6 974 eee “| Sage a 7 hl aR ne scan | amen a 5 3 7 ee ea | a oe Sil eee tes we ya 3 4 9 1 || — —}|—|— == |) — I — || — —|—|— rf}—;—}|—!i—] — — I 58 |158 — {132 | — | 632 || — | — | — 1145 | 216 | 361 1907 02 mee ESA he | O43 TS | 1579 4719 ‘i =F yi SNES al mas BAN seo aa lems cal ere i 56 73 aeeeaO! |, B32 evar een aor), 68 431 8 10 | — 18 ||} —|—|]—] 1 5 6 29 I — | — th hh |) hk — 2 — —|—}— — |} — |} — | — |] rl] — I I 14 — | 11 | — 56 |} — | — |] — 12] 15 a 148 7 eee Se ica aa Neue Oo 3 3 15 2 — | —|— S| ae a — 8 CT ee | TURMIBUIE, OMT. “GARLAND’S” TRAWLING. MORAY FRITH. 1893—1897. STATIONS VII. TO XVI. UNSALEABLE FISHES. MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST OCTOBER NOVEMBER Hotale ree of each SPECIES sie fa ; Species Inches |/1893|1894|1895|1896|1897| Totals||1897| Totals||1893|1894) 1895|1896|1897| Totals||1893|1894|1895) 1896) 1897) Totals ||1893)1894|1895|1896|1897| Totals ||1893/1894|1895|1896| 1897 | Totals 1o* | — | — | — | — ie) 10 10 —]|10} 1 |—|—y] 11 —|/—|!9/]4)]— 13 10 | 10 | —]| 10 | —} 30 el 9 13 87 GreyzSkatenGiiss.csticecce: 12 —|— —il—} 2;—}]—]— 2{//—|—}—}]—] — — 2 Thornback ... 2 —I3 1}/—|—]—|]— I 2 2 || =) 2) 2 = = i Pe | MN —= |= | ik I 2 9 Starry Ray... —Il 2{|—|—|— 2 2 2 => = = I 4)—] 1] — 6)}—}—]—]}] rt] — i II Sandy Ray —Il — I I — = I ry—}—f;]—}—]|] — — 2 (Cialdl ccposascaens —§ II —|/—]— II — = |= |=] 2] =|] = I vi =|] = | = |] = ui |] Sf on I 14 Haddock —8 i469 | — | —|—]—] 469 || 3 3i/—}] 4] i12}—]— 16" ||) — |) — | 845) — | 84 |/393 | —| — | 3}—]| 396] —) —}] —}] — 6 6 974 Whiting ... = 2)—=) =| =] — 2) —— = 2 2 = = =] =| =| = 3 3 7 Hake .... 12 — — 2 2 || = | | =F 3) = 3 = |] = | Ss 3 4 9 Halibut . —13 — —_ I 1 {| — | =| — | =] = —}—}—}—]—-—]}] — _— I Sail-Pluke ....c-..... 7 I ry—}—}]—]—] — a I Long-Rough Dab... . ...) —8 46 | — | — | —}] — 46 |Ir24 | 124 || — 1318 | 68 | — | — | 386 || — | — |2g0 |128 | —] 358 ||158 |342 | — |x32 ] —| 632 |] — | — | — |r45 | 216] 361 1907 Plaice 7 a _— — | — Dao neers as | —7 326 | — | — | — | — |] 326 |\312 312 || — |484 | 77 | — | — | 56x || — | — ]300 |117 | — | 417 |\702 |298 | — |524 | — | 1524 || — | — | — |264 |1315 | 1579 4719 Lemon-Dab —7 6};—}|—jJ—}]— 6 5 5siy/—] 4} 2;—]— 6 || — 14 1}|— 15 71 7/—}] 3/—-— 17 |}/—}—}]—}]— v 7 56 Gumard —7 69} —|—}|—]— 69 || 25 25 || —}]57|/—|]—|/— 57 || — 48 | 31 | — 79 || 73 | 19 | —| 40} — | 132 |] —| —]|—| 21] 48 69 431 Poor Cod = s5s)—-f]—-l|—-|— 5 —}]—}—/—}—-]— =} 85) = |) | 10) |) — 188 ar 5 6 29 Solenette _— 1} —/—]—} = I _— _— I iS | = | S| = _ 2 Butterfish — || — —|— — _— —|—|— =, =] =] — | = I I Angler — 9}/—|J—J—-—-|]— 9 || 20 20) |) 149) |) a yeh Wp te BP 2271 \\ a0) | ess Ca eee 56. || = |) 2) a5 27 148 Dragonet — 1}/—/—}]—]— I I i 2 2 — —}) 7/—}]—] 1] — 8) —}—|—|— 3 3 15 Pogge — 3 3y,/—] r}—}|—|— I =| fi | I Ai ve i == | = |] — a= FH | HS FS = 8 Wolf-fish _ — — I re |] = |S | = SS = |= | = | = | = | = = I Three-bearded Rockling.| — I I =|=—)/—|=— = = = I 948 | — | — | — |] —] 948 ||498 | 498 || — |890 |159 | — | — | 1049 || — | — |698 |282 | — | 980 |\1367}706 | — |730 | — | 2803 || — | — | — |4q48 |1622 | 2070 8348 * Number of Hauls. tit ot 4H NTN Hea Wie pie A nye SY genes me # xs | 4 : F EN ce ae at % f , i i ; 2) ‘| 7 AA fee 14a¢ eee es oe ’ 4 f i ; wee ts thd ; ‘ . | ‘ ‘4 ear { ee | i f pes tlh «see a i + ce by { * y p. ; 4 a : oe i Pua eye ha 1 4 { Hi i ‘ A, , * ath at’ ie vs ier; « TRU eee hee Poenie t ‘ f 7 y | f HEH [ac ‘ i [ation nae be WOW ema ieee j } ‘ : ’ i : So ! j ine ¢ en 1 ; d er ck we ag, ed 2 ) ote Cie g si t } : 1 al 3 Pas ; ; LP Ie Sa Pe f " a , 9 oes Vf ; wk i ‘ Srp ler i 4 ‘ uy { : a j , 5 {i r . | | b ae F 3 ; a it ane : i J AYP | L6g1—f6¢1 1Sz Cbz 99z ogz | Lee | olt LIZ | Gla. = col ney sed ‘ON O9BIDAYV Lg bl €1 sal of 1 II OI Ol es 61 OI 6 6 — — — or | — L6g1 gI VI v v OI v — — — 9681 OI OI = a = 6 I — — S691 Oz Oz ss = OI a Ol | aa v6gI OZ _ 0% — = OI — — — OI £681 s]ne yy 2 = “ eae peas "AON | PCE | ‘sny | Aqnf | ounf | Avp Ito X TAX OL ‘IIA SNOILVLS ‘Z68i— £681 ‘HLINA AVYOW ONIIMVUL «.SAONVIUNVD, WN) eG el a i hermes nent ines Suman Soeeeninee Saye, yp ce ee > an bia ate ; . Shree ie ids ik IIE 5 4! ' ci * * ‘ . } H of oe ake s Ot oot has Beis) ors) 1 qi y “y bers iiss aes “ : r = i p ' ik a A Heh ) ; Pie e aS x ; % Ae may, A ri ' W 7 pm OgSEI || ogz | 6gz | 61 | HEI | ofr | ob: 9o00z Of eele_ | Sel |Og 5 oor | Vt 60bz A0evei se | LL" | Vy se| eG nce brit sollte G}sithel, Corohe tele) Ve Ais sont 9SSS Wee | OV eam | Vice Go O- Sbbz TOR | Gceorinic esa peices | eegt soust giqeeyes || TAX | AX | AIX |IIIX| ITX | IX ie 26 SSI B061z gb oe Wes 201 gziv OzIzZ viz IQ C¢y 69g ogbt mo $8 VII 1007 AS LSE 6L Lee zorZ 9651 a Sir | zr || oglb | Si€z SOUS Seas ae See eil Mersocrata soysty [P10], soysty pue . s SrEsies a[qeoesuy) jeTqvayes || puviy jatqvayesug SNOILVLS TIV LV INVA wd AOVAATAV STVLOL ‘L68I—£6g1 681 Soz £61 $6 €Qz IZI xX ra 967 oof vol blz 79S giz XI IIA NOILVLS HOV Lv (Soysiy oa[qvayesug) pure a[qveyes) TAV]] Yad AOVAIAYV TAS Ol. casio nLwals NDS a Le Wa Hits AVdOW ONT al «SGNYIAVD » Z6g1—f6g1 £8 L691 61 g6gI QI S6g1 Ol v6g1 Oz £691 oz sTAV]Y aX 10 ‘ON “ Et ; a 2E he? 9 J 1 acelin rea ey L i j & r 1 Sawer i Voys teak ae * yu eer a hos os AP a 893—1897. i cee Ts aT fake i a ae Te i ee a he AVERAGE PER HAUL = N S ; ay 4 oo | oO melele/2| ge lete| 2 2] % ee Nec ines. | 2) Serer al: o Ge we Be | oe ey i ee |S —_ peereel iMaMT || Coe EMT ota Gh Rnb on clase amas hs, eGR” |e aaa! Peemi eager | 69 8 Il 97 3 | 28 || May, October Mee Sane4s 5. | 87 8 a6, 150. 13° | 33 July,-October 2| —| 20]! 4 | 57 8 33 52 | 10 | 26 || July, August sae ike | on.) 5 28 43 2 | 31 || Aug., Oct., Nov. 3 Eo eaarie4. (128 8 26 17 I; 20 || June, November b| 9 |148 259.190 7 26 vi) GO 528 me | Seieon | 14) , 50 — | 604 7 \116 | April bj 1 | 14 Sei i: (ayer 6 | 695 19 | 47 || April ont TABLE, XXXVI. “GARLAND’S” TRAWLING. MORAY FRITH. 1893—1897. STATIONS VII. TO XVI. TOTALS AVERAGE PER HAUL No. oF : 7) 4 a ae | | Bm ne . T1AULSs as 8 2 So limo] x 6 a g a | bp ae Ss Sla/s |e 3 PE ee ORs om | eee (eorerel mee El g SS ESS ee) eee eG uCGRR ey ease Eee Ee Pe ee S| ag eae a de |e cy BP \aa SS ||. Meese lias cee Z| Cw ela] e|< | * Ra lie ee cs 20 1893 156 | 1396 | 167 237 | 118 | 1948] 63 BS || 21) 3 I 22 |—|1|— 3 ae) | 23 7 |) Gs) 8 It 97 3 | 28 || May, October 20 1894. 113 | 1759 | 166 761 | 42 | 3172 | 2790 668 | 4 | 4] 13 8 |—}] 3 ]/— 6 ey OP Gag i & | ey 8 38 | 158 | 13 | 33 || July, October 10 1895 46 578 89 334 | 10 527 | 106 265 | 3/—|] — 7 |—|—|]— I DS 2h one 57. 8 33 52 | 10 | 26 || July, August 18 1896 35 | 1707 | 106 508 | 22 776 | 46 565 | 16 | 2 7 20 3)/—|— 3 Ov @ | ayy 2 i ext 5 28 43 2 | 31 || Aug., Oct., Nov. 19 1897 75 | 2444 | 155 506 | 61 329 | 28 388 | 6] 1 6 53 | —}r1f— B | Si] oe as a es 8 26 17 1 | 20 || June, November 87 1893—1897 || 425 | 7884 | 683 | 2346] 253 | 6752 | 522 | 2460 | 31 | 10 | 27 | 196 3 i) & I — | uo 32 | 36] 9 |148 || 3:9] 90 7 26 17 6 | 28 33 1884 193 42 152 — 102 1812 | 21 349} — | 4) — 3 I 2 I — 1|—] 8 || 64] 14] 50 — | 604 7 \116 || April +6 1898 18 87 127 40 89 | 4173 | 119 287 | 1 | 10| 62 70 1 |—|—| 35 — |145] 1 | 14 Bll wl |) Pai 6 | 695 | 19 | 47 || April * On Smith Bank, &c., inside Moray Frith. + Outside Moray Frith. a ee ee ee - 5. _ of each 4 : Species 1896 _||1895|1896 Totals LE 97 xe 4 — II 2 oy a | Io |) 53 14 foro) pf fe ag 102 To ee | 7 || 2 I ey en aed 2 oe ae SES Pea I — —|—|_-| 8 ia Bae oe = I = | =e Le roy 5 oa | A Meee hh | ge 2 fle aE reer cea 5 || 39 7 I FOO k OG ae > Sas bes eae 18 Rees Se inl ee oc 74 pre co ee ice) } 2D. 6 || 22 A} = Bae > arQ - ee lea i Meee | 102 28 26] 2) 28 || 404 I | ae eae pw 12 — ,— |e — || 8 — j —— — — | 62 9 | 8 8 || 92 338 ||309 B-/* 316 |) 4285 +a | 2 | 2 || 74 32 | FO Ve Ei Pee eee 2 | 3|—| 3 1) 10 4 | 2\;—) 2 II 20 tC EN a eae depen 0 | Werte 16 ese) — |" BS it eee da | oe oo eee I |/—| 1| I |i IO 48 wp [ez 1 fea ie. aes 46 ae | 36 | 68 509 pa ae ee 9 58 =a | te Te a | 6 a | ee eh 25 2g 2 *|) 89.4 — |) 0.89 490 | 122 187 | 6 | 193 | 985 3 ea oa el 32 | — 8} —| 8 8 ) fg Sed Meee es os : | I 2|—| 2 || 8 [957 95 | 1052 | 8428 ANSE Oval Ie “GARLAND’S” TRAWLING. FRITH OF CLYDE. SALEABLE FISHES. TOTALS FOR FIVE YEARS. FEBRUARY ||MARCII APRIL MAY || JULY|| SEPTEMBER|}OCTOBER|| NOVEMBER || Totals : Saas of each SPECIES Triches : x Species 1888 1888 1896|1897| Totals|| 1897 || 1890 1897 1896 1895|1896) Totals 2a II WW || aN ae 12 12 12 II WN a 13 97 Grey Skate (large)............ 16— — — —| 1 I i I I _— a = 4 IO YoY ep Seis sooo] LW z 9 I | — I = — I _ —|— == II Thornback (large) 19— — — B 8 II 8 12 2 Io | — 10 |! 53 Do. 13—18 — a 6 | 15 21 15 12 18 14 ris) ff 19 102 SEbItahY IR hy! oo Sooecdsn i — 6 | — 6 I _- 10 fe |= V/ 2 Flapper-Skate I11i— || — I — I =| = = 2 Shagreen-Ray I1— || — — —| 1 it | — — — | I Cuckoo-Skate ... te _— 4 4 = = ak 8 Raia maculata ... (ie = = || os I — — — == i) he I Cod (large) ...... Ba _ — Le —— I 2 I I — —;j—-—|/; — 5 ID, “Ae Boosgses 8—22 I I 4] 3 7 || 6 6 2 5 6 | 6 34 Haddock (large) sooo! 1G — 2 5 | 10 15 3 12 —— 2 Se 5 39 [Bley = = 9 = se ansa009 10—14 -— 3 13 | 39 Be ae NY ey) 27 7 TO | On meee 170 Do. (small saleable)...| $—9 = So 19 | 12 Spe = SN -- 18 —jir} wm 74. Whiting (large) — | I 31 5 8 WW os — — Io|/— |} 10 22 Do. — 80 24 | 23 47 || 15 || 31 16 6 22 | 2 | 24 219 Do. (small saleable | — IO | 11 21 13 || 53 12 3 —|— — 102 lakeienstrerssee oan cciestoer 12 15 || 44 j106 | 150}; 73 ]) 54 56 28 FAG |) 28 || 404 Ling i= = I I 2 | 2 2 2 I 2 3 12 Lythe = — |—]| 6 6 —| 2 — — —|— — 8 ISEENAI ANS 55 c08 $— — —|I rj) — 2 59 a =r |e c= 62 Sail-Fluke [= — 30) ||) 12 3 14 25 I 5 9 8 | — 8 92 Vint cei Steet dete amen eae 7— 2 176 =: ||522 |713 | 1235 650 || 237 337 338 309 ieee 3285 Long-Rough Dab (large)...) 10o— = Be) i Bal 3 5 2 || — 6 — 2|— 2 74 Do. seal] =O) aa 4 37 | 67 | 104 55 || 74 25 32 Rs 79 373 Turbot —_ I I I 2 Tele ed — 2 3/— 3 10 Deseo oon — 2 2 I 3 6 3 — 4 2|— 2 20 Plaice (large) I 5 Ne 4 — I 7 2 4|/— 4 24 o. 13 48 2TS E32 53 5 37 25 16 TO (Pies 15 212 Do. (small saleable) — — Bulee7 10 9 3 4 5 @) |} a 10 41 Dab (large) I 6 —|=— _ _— I — I — I 10 Do. nen 7—II1 14 125 65 | 56 121 53 66 97 48 Oe Moeore 104 628 Lemon-Dab 7— 1 57 ~«|| 80 | 65 145 59 65 58 46 32 | 36 68 509 Solemn ey y= 3 Fea, 6) 10 12 5 7 4 yee 9 58 Flounder (large) 1o— = I ies, 5 — = _ — —|-, = 6 10 Xe}. | Reg =F Sacastugcouns 7—9 4 20 4 = = = = — — —|— _ 25 Gurnard (large) ..... I1— — — || 40 |119 | 159 25 33 57 127 89 | — 89 490 Do. 7—I10 = — 100 |250 | 350 157 93 7O 122 187 | 6} 193 985 Red Gurnard ........... 7— — — 8 9 17 2 I 3 —}|— — 32 Sapphirine Gurnard .. = = == = — — 8} — 8 8 TBR comnccios anoBeogdace 12— —_ _ —j|— — — I — _ —}— a I (CL YHIE whedactannng sckeros=rn 33— = = —| 3 3 |} Boyt — I 2|— 2 8 50 655 1038]1585| 2623 || 1247 || 854 910 857 957 | 95 | 1052 || 8428 * Number of Hauls. EF. JULY 1890 12 SEPTEMBER Per OF CEYMDE. FOR FIVE VEARS. OCTOBER 1897 1896 12 II I = 41 49 — II 14 a= I ae, I aa 19 68 3 ae 106 129 96 92 2 4 = 44 56 98 -_— I 4 os I I eye 14 19 we I 7 I 5 ae = I 396 518 NOVEMBER 1895|1896| Totals 12nd 13 2a ico 2 25 DM ie I 2|— Z 92 132 2 2) 13 19 18 19 31 I 32 Nines 2 SAN Nestea 31 Totals of each Species TABLE XXVIII. “GARLAND’S” TRAWLING. FRITH OF CLYDE. UNSALEABLE FISHES. TOTALS FOR FIVE YEARS. FEBRUARY||MARCH|| APRIL | Mav|lyutyllsppremper|l ocr : "a J EMBER || OCTOBER || NOVEMBER Totals SPECIES een Se 5 of each ecies I 1888 1896)1897| Totals|| 1897 || 1890 1897 1896 1895|1896| Totals Pp — 2* Il 12 | 12 24 12 12 12 ul ealae ia oF MEY SOKA LGR nesacteres Petar: —I2 2 29 Tee I 2 r= z Thornback .... eF = res I = Sis ae 35 Starry Ray .... ae a mS Lee 36 25 13 au 49 AZM Blk A 189 Sandy Ray....... —Il — — 6 6 3 — = 1 zeae : ; Flapper-Skate =n ane 4 iia a oe oe = = 24 2 22 Cuckoo-Skate II = = = |= == = — I = ae aa ; Raia maculata —Il — I — _— I — i a » circularis —I1 = 3 = — = we MG | be = G ved Sas ze = 12 I} — I I I — = — - A we addock. — — 2 17 | — I — = 2 | Whiting .. =7 = 5 7 7 : 23) 2 25 es Hake yaa = = Witch 7 eae if Aa cele ee aaa 2S 2 es 7 7 || 293 Long-Rough Dab : 3 3 3 7 ; aa = I 157 |13 291 213 IDEIES cnccosnoesanonscsn 7 I I we he z 2 eee 8 a BSA ed) Ces ae IDA) asecsncc 7 = 140 |] 84 | 63} 147 || 83 ]|| 99 6 2 : pemen Dae —/ as 27 6| 1 7 7 3 * 7 5 i es i urnard ....... —7 _— 265 16 | 18 I 2 Red Gurnard ...... —7 — 2 —| 3 * ae 2 x a ag ef ag ar Labrus (?) maculatu = = = Toles I a= ae en : Torr Corel sssonoanieaovos —_— — 29 14 | 16 30 i] 6 5 8 John Dory .... =e eas, 3 ay a i ‘ y 5° a I es 0) a Trigla lineata. — — — —|2 2 — = ae = pees | Pere a 2 Smeltaee. neers S000 — — = I = oes Fetes ner I Argentine ........... seve neenes = = 4 4 Ctenolabrus rupestris ...... = — —|— — I as = = ee Be I Zeugopterus punctatus ...... = = I I 2 — _— I — —}— == 3 Liparis montagui ....... — — —|— _ — = I — = I Cottus scorpius ...... = I —}-— = = = == I INVA Re cegnngssiner — = I Il | 14 25 30 4 14 19 31 I 32 125 Dragonet — 2 9 5 2 il 8 13 — — 39 Nursehound ... = = 2 = I B |= 2 5 Picked Dogfish ... Ss = = See 5 3 32 7 I 2 hie 3! 79 Spotted Dogfish... eee — = 5 = 5 Lesser Dogfish ..............5 = — — —|— = = = I a ee aE 6 Black-mouthed Dogfish = = = = I = —_ I 5 657 {1336 1338 | 674 || 450]! 347 396 518 404 | 58} 462 || 3509 * Number of Hauls. eter Comte Sat . ’ eve . ee een eee [nepy sod IZI QII €z1 QII czI gol OOI Ivi Ler 611 Lz ‘ON a8tiaAy yjuow aed L6 Lv oS ca II ZI ZI ZI vz II Z s[NeE] JO ‘ON of vz ZI — a ZI — ZI ZI a — L6g1 bz II ca I II — — — ZI — — 96g1 zI — ZI ZI — — — — — — — S61 ZI ZI — — — — ZI — — — — O61 eI — tI — — -~ — — — II Zz QgglI “INEL | syauoyg | seus |, Pe te cl pace 4 : gO OON eecgte ny peor | oO) ee | AL | Ae core) deat wee [210.L - ‘HLNOW WHd STINVH HO “ON AGATO HO HLIAH ONIIMVAL. «SS AONVTAVS » ax XOX < Eey L ne ee nh in te Rn mn a VERAGE PER HAUL OF CERTAIN FISHES | Soe se | Gurnard February, March July | November April, Oct., Nov. April, May, Sept. . TAN BIE IS. OOK “GARLAND’S” TRAWLING. FRITH OF CLYDE. STATIONS I. TO XII. | 1{ AVERAGE PER HIAUL oF | | Tomas | CERTAIN FISHES No. OF | ] | » Os | =the ; ~ : a, 5 | | 2 HauLs LP BAR 3 5) Bio | trea] og Se eee z 0 fy 3 SS = is =| | 2 @ || lan toes alee. eee! 1A | EA l8sal| = 12) & |g ale | 2 Ble lel el elalalsiscal ele le = 5 | Ej is s is OG} s | (5) 5 iE 5) | ms i|e|o | 3 es ede fei ease cal eal | 13 1888 || 69 286 | 95 64} 14 | 30 I | 265] 122 |—/ 30] 178) 1] 2} 26) 40} — | —| ir |} 22 5 | 20. 9 | 13 || February, March 12 {| 1890 || 41 | 166 68 212 8 50 | 96 129 73 2 238 I a I | 35 2 5 || 13 17 10 | 6 | 19 |} July ~ 12 | 1895 || 28 | 169 34 240 | 6 44 321 289 33 2) 8.) 309) 3) 2 ar |p — 9 || 14 | 20 | 24) 2 | 25 || November 24 1896 || 50 | 358 | 172 362 | 12 | 100 | 48} 461 | 145 3 | 20) 86x | 31] 6) — | 2) 89) —) 8 || m4) 15. | x0} © | 35 \|| Aprill Oct, Noy. 36 =| 1897 || 91 448 | 192 61 | 15 | 127 97 | 761 | 324 5|33| 1706] 2) 7) 5| 7 \169 | 60) 25 || 12| 17 | 21] 9 | 47 || April, May, Sept. . fase 97 ee 279 | 1427 | 561 | 1489 | 55 | 35% 354 | 1905 | 697 | 12 | 92 | 3292 | 10 | 20 | 31 | 50 [344 | 62 | 58 | t4| 35 | 19| 7 | 34 | | | ‘SUOTJOVIT 0] ONp s9oUdIOWIG , IZI of &g Qf1 ze i Sor O71 ge ZQ rte Ge 6 OOI 6z 1 Sor 10 145] SoUusT PIES SUlh = -sousiy |} Sousta || gute a[qvayesu yy) | s,qvares SiGeeieS LSL11 60S€ | gbzg gz6b | vegiII | zvle 7067 Z16 o661 IQCI bor LS6 10ZI Lve | VSg Loft Z99 Gof IO, | Seysty | soysty puriyy | oTqvetesuy | ajqvayes 6241 | Qtr | vor .90¢ | OLZI | Ig1 Coie\eGal=| Oca Oe oie vel | Ontos eye | 4 |) Go NOW |2sOc.| 01 |-2g1 | ee. | SE} Zor Cie 1Ons| OM laerl |= I 6/=-| "101 COl | so— | Orr | 97 1S \= OSs Ot Gli eon err isc | aie. | fo. om 6LZ1 | 90 | of€z | 6g Eee Ae apy ait 6Z€ | PLI | gii €1 OLe | gern VII | I1I | 98 TEX | TX |e Xe Dole EAS LAS aI |. N. Nas) CLL SNOILVLS TIV LV TAVE] Wid FVUIAY S'IV.LO J, NOILVLS HOVa LV (Soysiy a[qvayesuy) pue o[qevates) TAVH UId AOVAAAV 2 1Y LOLYaGNY NOLIVLS HOVA LY Sudo VLaAYV mG AT Ors Geel --S NIA hb A SGN Ta VS ss 1X, BIEL ©8 CZ 68 Iil cr Z6 let 6L €z1 bS L6 QI IQ ||sawox oat L681 968i S6e1 O6g1 $881 UVAA cz Sut pl orb RII ssSe } ie go VE Be i t - \ a Pe Fist Ss a eee Ea ai ¢* (Se bee 4 tt te “ 7 i i ’ pea A Ee oh, get SOF Cet NOVEMBER TOTALS LS VII WITT: Scr TOTALS Night || Day | Night; Day | Night| Day | Night) Day | Night || Day | Night Beet | 05. | 64 | 286 | 353 | 404 |) 543 724 | 1093 = 2a == lh 1730) i i4z7e 548 || 53 | 121 | 65 | 64 | 286 | 358 | 404 | 543 || 2454 | 2569 TABLE: XXX. al “GARLAND’S” TRAWLING. FRITH OF CLYDE. COMPARISON OF DAY AND NIGHT HAULS. SEPTEMBER NOVEMBER VIL VIL” XU TOrALs YEAR VII* VIII XII TOTALS VIL VITl XII Torats VIL VIII XII Day | Night} Day | Night} Day | Night| Day | Night|} Day | Night} Day | Night} Day | Night| Day | Night|) Day | Night} Day | Night) Day | Night Day | Night} Day | Night} Day | Night] Day | Night|) Day Night SOO ea dial Le7 a tea iin egOn imagen ASB us GeO. Gah 5 Out oa ieee No lees ie pale ae (ote ese les i 53 | 121 | 65 | 64 | 286 | 358 | 404 | 543 || 724 | 109, 1897 || 229 | 231 | 217 | 109 | 176 | 145 | 622 | 485 || 120 | 158 | go2 | 142 | 149 | 143 | 571 | 443 || 147 | 13 | 96 | 58 | 204 | 477 | 537 | 548 1 — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |i ¥730} raz Totals|} 268 | 418 | 474 | 339 | 200 | 278 | 942 | 1035 | 120 | 158 | 302 | 142 | 149 | 143 | 571 | 443 || 147 | 13 | 96 | 58 | 294 | 477 | 537 | 548 || 53 | t21 | 65 | 64 | 286 | 358 | qo4 |) 543 |} 2454 | 2569 * Stations. i | SMITHSONIAN il LIBRARIES 3 9088 00712 3755 hI | fare reeton ge oan anae pmeemare nar ite nacre backs 9: Hae iy : ' * . a : es pai i ov, an Ne ad 4 sath eae 1g pate e p : tyne - ies , win RA BER galt ah iy ‘ wh anaes 4 F j : 3 rem roeelSytelS ih ith LEONG wae eles tinea gota tot ola TL anit Cen Es acs dette : ; e ! : ; : ; Le tie ole Ea tap r : = a “e 5 ! | . « 3 Gg i >, | ian : Si ; ; i vt ‘ a Lge tiat ting, eS " ee es ae - 7 ae uae e asst t ey . ~ eee eeepe te CS earn nonin ast a ee ME = arn rd atta : i fe “ Ye fa ~ nn = SS ee - — = ee = Sas eta, , ‘ Sr va ene = cr rn = = a SS : ss ‘ rig i i — a ba =e = = — — ee SSS = S= = . - t } i LPG ee V4 me = — = oo a a ; : - ii” 1h) ae = pithy eS —" — ees 5 = Saf GN agent see . ms i eno Uf A ror Pg Mg en eg OG ner = % = iin . t : ‘ : hi, ss ~ = — — —— Si ane . . : > . ’ > = ~~ — =" ~ panies “ f ‘ = = ~ ees ~ 4 a = m 5 ae | % Nad > 2 CESS coos : : p ans — ’ 2 . = aS >is / - eS : = std. i “ : | ie Chscorors = ‘e SONG P = = = oS, : a = = . oot | : ‘ , = ~ — = = = ——— < a 2 er srolplaip te oe ‘ Po gst =, 5 Hy / = ees Ts = ~ = se i ‘ a ans Aes 7 ante al " Tn Pins . i) Lif MN a — — = - See —— See Sse alta Be ce : 4] } . sy ks =a ER a SoS aa Ree, as = == == sat ao Peal Tere MN ema : "patio t ttl as chia . ff 1 yk P ; P F ‘ F . - pik cnge epee Meat Ral pet ce 4 POR hr ee re HF ake " > . . ; 3 ms oi jobte, Sifote ma f + oe ot Nad « ipa yep t as pie e ae pe tele dvigt sate rp, Se ena a cerrae ee ’ “4 ; As Boy at Ain DAs ewig ait sl agen i PC Ea Pee Saag ear Pug Bie ae ee F gE ao ap toa Soil ane ae a He . . a . roe aia ee ee ’ é Pte Pues Bs tu (as eee as toa - Pe ge i ge sé ae oe ge oe + ‘ ; PB ee et At Meee . . . hajir Masts z ae . iW bat ay iS oh tls Pv diate: aia f Pus Baie Ee ee a IE i etre sot aioe " gents : eegn et) alg het ey eeas Sap eet S ? “ jr ep ay mI - Z fe ey sae ae: a en ath Oe A aidal dia en aae : pil Me cea Bung dr? Mm ce PMY * Pir en ge ne tale eed aa pt Plan BY Stee oF 4 any ' : ‘ ; ner 7 ue < Joel goed g Soe oa f a Foot poe tee” x oe gone a Joe a hot Shy ere. : seer eae ie ' ‘ pe s peat ge ae PEL P ye IP RES SoS . ‘ Mea J peceh tee ee ws BS, pense SAR Ratt ret Te ae nade oT Sen a a ge ae ae Id igen es : ‘ ; j ee fk P lode pair, pee stougt Sp ist South Og pias Pi OT wee he ae ee Ge RE SL heel ear ee yee yah Psi ne i tot , ’ 3 ~4 he Ne ade " Ae Maar tate Seek Pu i ’ Paprne ts Teg a in po Sh TUN RR lt hae lg eos r & 3 gh BT eae hoy cols he et inet elt. gig hems agtr te SB tbs ” Z ; calle Me, egret Pa er, jhathng sete neal } : . ee EW te eee ats Poe sto age’ Pap tell oieeert Co gil te A e aNe gets a pases Pea a of La hee, eT ge alt eg Sopa ate hg : veg : f no ‘ ‘ ¢ oe “Fast gen BPs g otag i 4 Pier age. 4 CLA t owls gan, " rakes - Lo ae ye - por 1 ban 4 y “ : ‘a 7 * * fas as » . P a T 7 - Tonks s - Poy ° re ‘ ‘ ir > fam” as = a. tbe. 7H $ er? nm i, ~ien Sy » 7 Sok ; ee PA , Sule adie Bhs athe a, so, ote ther, at Dortdy, ge at $ a a ie Oe age ty poet ie ; Pee gs 5 a ae” Gini Seer Fhe ah Tia toes ‘ 2 : 4 , +f . gill gust eae ciate Sena ete grits hae in PeEMPiey on bide s Pre gee I NF ep Sul ee: a Gen Se ork a ah aS ak nate iee oon pa othe igh Sag # ge a ee j . ; ; mi . : Pr ren AOS iF YL Si pita peu glee gmap ‘ : ues Needed nea het out MY ae teeta, LA Tere pele ger ute ee a pe Gy nt tea igs vipa tianed atts fa we eee " S57 / ; } ‘ “J f “ged at: Pe se a f Fin te gt neces Lmao a eee ae PA Tesh ek ailke-e Mind e eG® oslo al a ANA 08 alt Sigh ae Lae ae we Hae ats a a peta tig hy oe Rake 4 : i Fe an ; St Se Cae ime ett eat ee pt gh ake a ane a i AT eo ET opt nd ‘ Pe phen Cote ae AID gar Cad fe grt MPS aiPesi gm a ad Sra ie aaa OS gett . : p , 1g arrest ; : 4 goatee s J Xone 4 s Jy ‘ ete ae ae” ; , PES daar site eden Oe ae Res ag FR dl Se ge ce pee BS a” ioe ot hoot A 4 4 7 aT rl De a4. sh ye F owe rt Shea pe Pie see , pint feast RE iow ptt FES er AR Par grant th arpt a ee us att ; : f eae 8 .* Mos probe nat, , Ne : Sree esti ete Pulte trad sau oS St te gue adh sg emt ee pepe ei gedit abun te wp eR IIS BT eee! srl a Ff PA ate Rn Neate Ty Te : : : ot i Set . PER enw Tac rir ts hot a, ieee pee Patt ht Pah CP Ah ea tee let an eee an tae cai site ur attur pion eem . eat oF Sat a iawike ioe Loess ee ee) ods Sra ght tae ‘ pit Pts ge yt ae Fen ae Ag aT ee gt at Taw he wep SLE pla! eta TP AL gamba sett aes op le Potter “gan , BP I AS aT n. F pobias vote asi : r- got bee patie Se ala Side "aie Be yes 1 DOLE ght Bea ate Se OF hme AL SA BaP ol Page erey, pet eet ah tL OL ara og OTR plete dann yc ielete saneeedte Yn ght! : ; Paes * pa ry ty i 3 Lr - prt eS Bie ea ste Thee fe i - - Beg? gietiite eb Reae eater aL gy ain cr yh Fide? Res em “pts . ; : : ED ool Tet f bilge Fe, She oleae ere ety s : rete . a, : Re ait ts RA IS tog i Paha # tr rs ie ” er writ ® : ‘ ; hd y . : : ' pm 4 pig ete Spel ' = Y P digs gate oa $ at seh Beet at a ‘Smt, 2 4 y ou at whee ; i! Me { 1 fo gr eee y pe Mike! ts ay see sat, aire pie at SBS ar rey fF sed Nara CWT peu ate he wee PS wes 3) die set gd BOP Bee gt . : y ? ap: F ipa, : , : ; ed Pig tag yuhe edit pT ait yen Sie Keeh ifs ae ioe EGGS ge Ro abe poms Sweet ad ale AT? Net thd eee Ie Rr aes oc Soest te tn ae hn LG we ' ‘ a4 ‘ ’ Fe ‘ i grey pte pie A oi ‘ gti LN Soe ghee oD ad este Stee I Oe Et arg IS oll cote Rae ie Hone Lag? i ‘ ene a i : eres } : eee sue, asa Sy rie F- PE UR we ea OR i : we ited e ' PE ith ghee Ra Bi, ms. Bigt Be 5 . . B ‘ , f F ¢ ota eee i ging ; i ‘ A r ‘ gop ke Ce Oe tee aie $e TEE. oi + hy eath gob d. 18 "9 ns es . +I t ‘ ‘ . Np yuan Ps + Petts st. 9 s¥ i Par ie Re rr ee hee PUP 9 2 Fs ar ese sth oe Rims ‘| She Aye Pe, Bit CLE gM SNEE ‘ Bike wt: nate “* a t ; Bist Sie ee 7 ; arate 4 wi 7 4 : 1 tor ae fy oD PACE Oe FP ae atin dite Ieee Wace ae ta Petia ae a ght ead gry ig soy et Loe atte i A 4. bayeof Cy ett: oe gg PO r of : ah epee , or Se ie Se BSE Be By Fett er a Prey a ee OT glo te Pre ah ? Bea by 7 " , 7: a % 2s ae - org €, wed og at ie R teh aye F ee fase wi tr) s ' by ae . . } : : i ‘ heh Pey : . ’ : ae ; ge ae Weg ey see Foo itins Foal Uae is a! ais le eT et Ly artes ; Foe PB OT nis fy ‘ hgh et er iq. 2 YS igs (Thaw de A, an depeclah Ahad ot he, tue ney eee ‘Pith, oe” #e "LAT o Deptt a ss mihi J nt eeties