Occasional Papers Museum of Texas Tech University Number 229 01 December 2003 Revised Checklist of North American Mammals North of Mexico, 2003 Robert J. Baker, Lisa C. Bradley, Robert D. Bradley, Jerry W.Dragoo, MarkD. Engstrom, Roberts. Hoffmann, CheriA. Jones, Fiona Reid, Dale W. Rice, and Clyde Jones Since the first checklist of scientific and ver¬ nacular names of species of North American mam¬ mals was published by Jones et al. (1973), the check¬ list has been updated periodically (Jones et al., 1975; 1979; 1982; 1986; 1992; 1997). The publication of this revision marks the 30 th anniversary of the check¬ list. From the beginning, it was hoped that the check¬ list would provide a useful reference for many scien¬ tific endeavors in general, both in the field and in the laboratory, and that it would be useful to students in particular. Since the publication six years ago of the most recent revision of the checklist (Jones et al., 1997), demand for copies essentially has eliminated the original supply. In addition, some significant taxo¬ nomic changes have been published in the primary lit¬ erature on mammals since that time. As in previous revisions of the checklist, we have attempted to in¬ clude all species of Recent mammals known to occur in North America (and its adjacent waters) to the north of Mexico and in the recognized published literature through 2003. The checklist represents a general con¬ sensus among the authors, but does not necessarily imply complete agreement among them on all issues. Thirty Years of Change After 30 years and 8 checklists, it seemed ap¬ propriate to review and summarize the changes that have occurred in the recognized fauna of North America north of Mexico since the first checklist was published in 1973. Table 1 illustrates the number of orders, families, genera, and species recognized in each revision of the checklist in the Occasional Papers (O.P.) series. From 1973 to 2003, there has been an increase at every taxonomic level (orders, 11 to 12; families, 41 to 46; genera, 141 to 166; species, 403 to 474). Many of the changes in the species classification were made to ensure monophyly of taxa. The greatest percent¬ age change has been in the number of genera (17.7%). The increase in the number of species (71, or 15%) reflects taxonomic changes (46), distributional changes (5), the addition of introduced, non-native mammals to the list (19), and the recognition of humans as a component of the native fauna (l). 2 Occasional Papers, Museum of Texas Tech University Table L Changes in the number of taxafor North Ameri¬ can mammals north of Mexico as recorded on the check¬ list published in the Occasional Papers of the Museum, Texas Tech University. Year (O.P. #) Orders Families Genera Species 1973(12) 11 41 141 403 1975 (28) 11 41 141 404 1979(62) 11 42 142 412 1982 (80) 11 42 141 417 1986(107) 10 43 14S 425 1992(146) 12 44 156 447 1997(173) 12 45 164 462 2003(229) 12 46 166 474 During the last 30 years, the science of mam¬ malogy has changed dramatically as rapid advance¬ ments in laboratory techniques, including the study of individuals at the molecular level, have been developed and refined. Technological advances undoubtedly will continue to influence our understanding of the sys¬ tematic relationships of species and will be reflected in continuing changes to the taxonomy and classification of mammals. Although changes in taxonomy require the student to adapt constantly to a new list of names and a new understanding of species relationships, it clearly should be the goal of all mammalogists to achieve the most accurate classification possible. Recent advances in molecular biology have pro¬ vided resolution to questions related to species identi¬ fication, reproductive isolation and hybridization with proof of the presence/absence of FI and backcrossed individuals within local populations. This new level of resolution, in combination with the application of the Genetic Species Concept (Avise and Walker, 1999; Bradley and Baker, 2001; Dobzhansky, 1950; May den, 1997; Mayr, 1969; Simpson, 1943), suggests that there are many species of mammals that are currently un¬ recognized (Bradley and Baker, 2001) on lists such as those provided herein and in Wilson and Reeder (1993). Some estimates are that there will be an increase of 25% (Baker, 2002) in number of species in the class Mammalia, but this may indeed be an underestimation. Our understanding of the systematics of mammals is probably the greatest in North America north of Mexico (the focus of this checklist) and it remains open to speculation how many additional species will ultimately be recognized within the North American faunal groups. An example of a cryptic species that was defined by gene sequence data is Notiosorex cockrumi (Baker et al., 2003), The more common situation will probably involve examples where subspecific differences have been described and the application of molecular data indicates the presence of more than one species. Ex¬ amples covered on this checklist include Neotoma macrotis (Matocq, 2002), Neotoma leucodon (Edwards et al., 2001), Canis lycaon (Wilson et al., 2000; Wilson et al., 2003) and within the Neotoma lepida complex (Patton and Alvarez-Castaneda, in press). Undoubt¬ edly, there will be many other examples within the shrews, rodents and possibly other taxa. It might be predicted that vagile species such as bats would be the least likely to have well defined phylogroups and unrecognized biological species. At a recent meeting of the North American Symposium on Bat Research (8-11 October 2003 in Lincoln, NE) two papers presented on bat species with a wide geo¬ graphic range suggest geographically distinct phylogroups. These were studies on Myotis lucifugus presented by Tanya A. Dewey of the University of Michigan and on Antrozous pallidus presented by Sa¬ rah E. Weyandt of Oklahoma State University. At this time it is not possible to understand how many if any of those phylogroups represent currently unrecognized species but it is probable that some do. The signifi¬ cant observation here is that the work of Dewey and Weyandt document that potentially vagile species of bats are divided into well-defined phylogroups based on gene sequence data. Further, these phylogroups need to be interrogated relative to specific status to better understand the biodiversity of the mammals north of Mexico. Baker et al.— Checklist of North American Mammals, 2003 3 Taxonomic Diversity Orders .—Although the overall number of orders (11) remained stable from 1973 to 1982, changes to the recognized orders occurred in 1979, when Mysticeti and Odontoceti were recognized as orders (eliminat¬ ing the order Cetacea), and Pinnipedia was reduced to a suborder of Carnivora, In 1986, the order Cetacea was restored, and Mysticeti and Odontoceti were re¬ duced to suborders, thus reducing the overall count of orders to ten. In 1992, Primates and Perissodactyla were added to the checklist. The recognized orders have remained unchanged since that time. Families .—In 1979, the walrus was recognized as belonging to a distinct family, Odobenidae. In 1982, the number of families did not change, but Kogiidae was reduced from familial status and Phocoenidae was recognized as a family separate from Delphinidae. In 1986, Kogiidae was restored as a family, bringing the total count to 43. In 1992, the families Cercopithecidae and Equidae were added to reflect the presence of the introduced rhesus monkey and the feral horse and ass in the North American fauna. Also in 1992, Cricetidae was abandoned as a family, and all New World rats, mice, and voles were recognized as belonging to the family Muridae. In 1997, the skunks were grouped as the family Mephitidae. On the current checklist, the family Hominidae was added, bringing the total num¬ ber of families to 46. Genera .—In 1975, the number of genera was unchanged from 1973, but Idionycteris was recog¬ nized as a distinct genus, and the bobcat and lynx were returned to the genus Felis, eliminating the genus Lynx . The addition of the genus Feres a brought the number of recognized genera to 142 in 1979. In 1982, Arborimus was recognized as distinct at the generic level, Microsorex was reduced from generic rank, and Tamias was recognized as the generic name for all chipmunks, eliminating the genus Butamias. On the subsequent checklist, Arborimus was not recognized as a distinct genus, but eight new genera appeared on the checklist as the result of taxonomic changes ( Brachylagus , Chaetodipus , Pusa, Pagophilus, Histriophoca), distributional changes (Lagenodelphis), and the addition of exotic species ( Boselaphus, Antilope). Eight additional genera were recognized in 1992, bringing the number of recognized genera to 156. Of the eight new genera, three were added as the result of taxonomic changes (. Nyctinomops , Lynx, Panthera), and five were added to reflect the pres¬ ence of introduced mammals (Macaca, Equus , Oryx , Hemitragus , Capra). In 1997, taxonomic changes added six genera to the checklist (Arborimus, Puma , Leopardus , Herpailurus , Axis, Dama ), and the discov¬ ery of Molossus molossus in Florida and reports of Peponocephala electra in Florida and Maryland added two genera. On the current checklist, the genus Alopex was deleted and the genera Homo, Eubalaena, and Neotamias were added, bringing the total recognized genera to 166. Species .—Total species increased by one from 1973 to 1975; 3 species were added and 2 were de¬ leted from the checklist as the result of taxonomic changes. In 1979,14 species were added to the check¬ list and 6 were removed, bringing the total species count to 412, Thirteen additions and eight deletions to the 1982 checklist brought the species count to 417. All of the changes in 1982 were the result of taxo¬ nomic revisions, with the exception of the addition of a cetacean based on a new record for North America. In 1986, taxonomic revisions added 12 names to the list and deleted 9; one cetacean was added based on a new record; and 4 introduced species were added. The total species count rose dramatically from 1986 to 1992 (from 425 to 447); taxonomic revisions ac¬ counted for 14 additions and 3 deletions, and 11 intro¬ duced or feral species were added to the list. The 1997 checklist included 4 additional introduced spe¬ cies and 2 new species (one bat and one cetacean) based on recent discoveries in North America, and taxo¬ nomic revisions added 15 names and deleted 6, bring¬ ing the checklist total to 462 species. On the current checklist, 15 additions and 4 deletions were reported as the result of taxonomic changes, and the addition of modem man to the list added one species, bringing the total to 474 species. 4 Occasional Papers, Museum of Texas Tech University Departures from Jones et al. (1997) and Other Notes The changes that have been made in the scien¬ tific names from those listed in Jones et al. (1997) are discussed below. Some other pertinent comments are included that might help to explain the current list of recognized species. Readers should note that although Wilson and Ruff (1999) was a more recent publication than the last checklist (Jones et al., 1997), Wilson and Ruff (1999) relied heavily on Wilson and Reeder (1993) as the basis for their book. Thus, there are numerous discrepancies between Wilson and Ruff (1999) and the current checklist. For clarification, we have noted these discrepancies throughout the following notes. We referred primarily to Rice (1998) for marine mam¬ mal designations. With a few exceptions, common names are adapted from Wilson and Cole (2000) for terrestrial mammals and Rice (1998) for marine mam¬ mals. INSECTIVORES Soricidae. —The taxonomy of the So rex cine reus group has a long and confusing history. Most recently, Demboski and Cook (2003) attempted to resolve the phylogenetic relationships among 8 members of the group using molecular data analyses. Demboski and Cook (2003) based their study of the group on the morphological phylogeny presented by van Zyl! de Jong (1991). Although the results of Demboski and Cook (2003) generally supported the phylogeny of van Zyll de Jong (1991), we note that the taxonomy of the entire Sorex cinereus group remains unresolved, and additional clarification is needed on the composition and nomenclature of this group. Of particular concern are three species of the Sorex cinereus group - hay deni ^ fontinalis, and jacksoni . Brunet et al. (2002) contended that Sorex hay deni does not warrant specific status. Demboski and Cook (2003), however, refuted this change. We have chosen to retain specific status for hay deni at this time. Likewise, we continue to recognize fontinalis as a species based on the electrophoretic analyses pre¬ sented by George (1988). Van Zyll de Jong (1999) and Demboski and Cook (2003), however, relegated Sorex fontinalis to subspecific status. In 1997 (Jones et al., 1997), we accepted the results of the karyologi- cal analyses of Rausch and Rausch (1995), which re¬ duced Sorex jacksoni to subspecific status. Both van Zyll de Jong (1999) and Demboski and Cook (2003), however, continued to recognize jacksoni as a spe¬ cies. Based on the data of Demboski and Cook (2003), we have chosen once again to recognize 5. jacksoni as a species on the current checklist. We follow Alexander (1996) in elevating Sorex moniicolus neomexicanus to a distinct species. Note that George (1999), however, retained neomexicanus as a subspecies. We follow Stewart et al. (2002) in elevating Sorex arcticus maritimensis to specific sta¬ tus. Notiosorex cockrumi , Cockrum’s desert shrew, has been added to the checklist. Baker et al. (2003) described this new species based on nuclear and mito¬ chondrial sequence data. In his account of Sorex palustris, Harris (1999) recognized alaskanus as a subspecies of palustris. Based on the works of Carraway (1995), George (1988), and Hutterer (1993), however, we continue to recognize Sorex alaskanus as a species. We continue to recognize Sorex pribilofensis as the correct name for the Pribilof Island Shrew, fol¬ lowing van Zyll de Jong (1991), Rausch and Rausch (1997), and Demboski and Cook (2003). Note that Hoffmann (1999), however, referred to the subspe¬ cies S. hydrodromus pribilofensis. Wilson and Ruff (1999) failed to provide an ac¬ count for Sorexyukonicus. This species was described by Dokuchaev (1997), and we continue to recognize the species. BATS Phyllostomidae.— Several unconfirmed reports of new bat records have come from the Florida Keys region, including the possible occurrence of Artibeus jamaicensis, Phyllonycteris poeyi , and Erophylla sezekorni. None of these reports have been substanti¬ ated through any scientific outlets, however, and we refrain from adding any of these species to the current checklist. Baker et al.— Checklist or North American Mammals, 2003 5 Vespertilionidae, —As summarized by Piaggio et ai. (2002), the systematic relationship between Myotis lucifugus and Myotis occultus has been the subject of multiple studies, with often conflicting results and con¬ clusions. Based on this most recent study, utilizing mitochondrial gene sequencing analyses, Piaggio et al. (2002) concluded that Myotis occultus represents an evolutionarily distinct monophyletic lineage and war¬ rants specific status. We have accepted that conclu¬ sion and included Myotis occultus as a species on the current checklist. Shump (1999) did not recognize Lasiurus blossevillii as a valid species, and continued to recog¬ nize blossevillii as a South American subspecies of Lasiurus borealis . We continue, however, as do most authors, to accept the results of Baker et al. (1988) and recognize Lasiurus blossevillii as a valid North American species. Similarly, Kurta (1999) did not recognize the spe¬ cific status of Lasiurus xanthinus , and placed it as a subspecies of Lasiurus ega. As on the 1992 checklist (Jones et al., 1992), however, we continue to recog¬ nize Lasiurus xanthinus as specifically distinct based on chromosomal and electrophoretic data (Baker et al., 1988). Several authors have argued for the recognition of Corynorhinus as a separate genus for the New World big-eared bats and the restriction of Plecotus to the Old World forms of this group (Frost and Timm, 1992; Tumlison and Douglas, 1992). In the last revision of this checklist (Jones et al., 1997), we retained the name Plecotus , but noted that the problem warranted addi¬ tional study. Recent works by Bogdanowicz et al. (1998) and Hoofer and Van Den Bussche (2001) have provided further support for the monophyly of the Old World genus Plecotus and the New World genus Corynorhinus . Therefore, we recognize Corynorhinus as the genus for the two North American species, Molossidae. - Although Wilson and Ruff (1999) did not include an account for Molossus molossus, we continue to list this species based on its discovery in the Florida Keys (Frank, 1997). LAGOMORPHS Leporidae .— We follow Ruedas (1998) who, based on a morphological analysis of 26 characters, elevated Sylvilagus robustus to specific status. Ruedas (1998) also suggested that £ f. holzneri and S. f cog- natus may warrant specific status, but he refrained from naming them as such. We continue to recognize holzneri and cognatus as subspecies pending further studies of this group. Halanych et al. (1999) questioned the validity of Lepus othus, given its minimal genetic distinctness from Lepus arcticus. As Halanych et al. (1999) emphasized, however, further studies are necessary to resolve the taxonomic status of the arctic hare group. Thus, we have retained Lepus othus on the current checklist. RODENTS Sciuridae. —Jameson (1999) concluded, based on the evolutionary relationships of chipmunk ecto¬ parasites, that the sub genera Neotamias, lamias, and Eutamias should be elevated to three separate genera. Recently, this conclusion was supported by Piaggio and Spicer (2001) based on their analyses of cyto¬ chrome b sequence data. We have revised the current checklist to reflect this change. Of the North Ameri¬ can chipmunks, only the eastern chipmunk, Tamias striatus , is assigned to the genus Tamias. All other North American chipmunks are assigned to the genus Neotamias , Arbogast (1999) suggested, based on cyto¬ chrome b analyses, that Glaucomys sabrinus oregonensis may warrant specific status. Further in¬ vestigation by Arbogast, however, did not find fixed allozymic differences between oregonensis and the re¬ maining conspecific populations of G. sabrinus (B. Arbogast, pers. comm.). Although it may yet be de¬ termined that G. s. oregonensis is a cryptic species, the evidence does not warrant elevation to specific status at this time. Arbogast et al. (2001) also investigated the tax¬ onomy of Tamiasciurus, and found little differences between the 3 recognized species ( mearnsi , douglasii, 6 Occasional Papers, Museum of Texas Tech University and hudsonicus) based either on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) or allozyme analyses. Arbogast et al. (2001) proposed that the recognition of a single, phenotypi- cally variable species, £ hudsonicus, comprised of 3 subspecies (hudsonicus, douglasii, and mogollonensis), may best reflect the currently available genetic and morphologic data. Pending further supportive data, however, we have chosen not to accept this reorgani¬ zation of Tamiasciurus. Geomyidae.- —We follow Jolley et al. (2000) in recognizing Geomys streckeri as a species. Heteromyidae .—As in 1997 (Jones et ah, 1997), we continue to accept the conclusion of Lee et ah (1996) that Chaetodipus eremicus warrants specific status. Note that Price (1999), however, continues to recognize Chaetodipus eremicus as a subspecies of C. penicillatus , We follow the recommendation of Riddle et ah (2000a) that the western populations of Chaetodipus baileyi be recognized as a distinct species, C. rudinoris. We also follow the conclusion of Riddle et ah (2000b) that Peromyscus fraterculus (previously assigned as a subspecies of P. eremicus ) warrants specific status. We continue to relegate elephantinus to subspe¬ cific status under Dipodomys venustus based on the genic and bacular data presented by Best et ah (1996). More recently, Best (1999) recognized D. elephantinus as a species, but readers should be aware that this account was written at the request of Don Wilson and Sue Ruff, and reflects the taxonomy proposed by Wil¬ son and Reeder (1993); it does not reflect the tax¬ onomy supported by the most recent available data (pers. comm,, Troy Best), Muridae .—Hogan et ah (1997) suggested that some of the currently recognized subspecies of Peromyscus maniculatus may warrant specific status. We agree that this group needs further study and clari¬ fication, but no changes are warranted at this time. Edwards et ah (2001) examined the molecular phylogenetics of the Neotoma albigula species group, and concluded that Neotoma albigula is comprised of two cryptic species. The eastern form was desig¬ nated as Neotoma leucodon , the Eastern white-throated woodrat. Matocq (2002) elevated Neotoma macrotis, the large-eared woodrat, to a species separate from N fuscipes based on morphological and molecular analy¬ ses. The taxonomy of the Neotoma lepida group is complex, and recent research indicates that lepida actually may be comprised of at least two species (Patton and Alvarez-Castaneda, in press). Those au¬ thors also suggested that the western form of lepida should probably be given specific status, although they hesitated to make a formal designation pending further research. Further, it is not clear if devia represents a valid species. Given the uncertainty of the taxonomy of the lepida group, we have not made any changes to the current checklist until further data are available. Following Frey (1999) and Frey and Moore (1990), we recognize the Mogollon vole, Microtus mogollonensis, as a species distinct fromM mexicanus. Batzli (1999) recognized the brown lemming by the specific name Lemmus sibiricus, but acknowledged that trimucronatus may be the correct name for the species. We recognize the name trimucronatus fol¬ lowing Jarrell and Fredga (1993), We continue to fol¬ low the taxonomy presented on the last checklist (Jones et al., 1997) for the Dicrostonyx group. See Engstrom (1999), however, for an alternative view. CARNIVORES Canidae .—Recent molecular evidence (Wilson et al., 2000; Wilson et al,, 2003) provided support for the recognition of the eastern Canadian wolf as a spe¬ cies distinct from the gray wolf. The species Canis lycaon is therefore added to the checklist. At this time we continue to recognize the arid land foxes as distinct species, Vulpes velox and V macrotis , following Mercure et al. (1993). While not¬ ing that the status of this species is questionable, Thacker and Flinders (1999) chose to follow Wilson and Reeder (1993) in recognizing one species, Vulpes velox . Readers are referred to Dragoo and Wayne (2003) for a review of the systematics of the species. We follow Geffen et al. (1992) and Mercure et al. (1993) in recognizing the arctic fox as Vulpes lagopus . Karyology, DNA hybridization, and allozyme Baker et al.— Checklist of North American Mammals, 2003 7 electrophoretic data all indicate a close relationship of the arctic fox, kit fox, and swift fox and conflicts with the previous assignment of generic distinctness for the arctic fox, Phocidae, —We have chosen to follow Rice (1998) in the taxonomic classification of the species in this group. Note that the various authors of Wilson and Ruff (1999), however, differed in their classifica¬ tion. Mephitidae. —Based on external and cranial mor¬ phology and molecular data, Dragoo et al. (2003) re¬ cently revised the taxonomy of the genus Conepatus. Two species, Conepatus leuconotus and C, mesoleucus , and their subspecies were determined to represent only a single species, C. leuconotus, Felidae, —We follow Wozencraft (1993) in rec¬ ognizing the correct spelling for the scientific name of the jaguarundi as Herpailurus yaguarondi rather than yagouaroundi. CETACEANS Balaenopteridae, —Based on Dizon etal. (1996), we chose in 1997 (Jones et al., 1997) to recognize Balaenoptera brydei and B, edeni as two distinct spe¬ cies, with the smaller B. edeni being restricted to the coastal waters of the eastern Indian Ocean and the western Pacific Ocean (Jones et ah, 1997), Additional studies have supported that arrangement (Wada and Numachi, 1991; Dizon et ah, 1998), and we continue to recognize B , brydei on the current checklist. Rice (1999), however, retained the more conservative ar¬ rangement of B. edeni as a single species, although he acknowledged that questions remain regarding the tax¬ onomy of B. brydei/edeni . See Rice (1998) for a more thorough discussion. Balaenidae,— The taxonomy of this family re¬ mains in dispute. Most authors recognize two genera, Balaena and Eubalaena , but others include both spe¬ cies in Balaena (see Clapham, 1999). We have cho¬ sen to recognize both genera. Further, the number of species within the genus Eubalaena is a matter of con¬ troversy. The most common taxonomic arrangement recognizes two species: Eubalaena glacialis , the north¬ ern right whale, and E , australis , the southern right whale. Rosenbaum et al. (2000), however, found that the North Atlantic, North Pacific, and Southern Hemi¬ sphere populations were each diagnosable by the pres¬ ence of unique nucleotides at three or four base-pair positions in the control region of the mtDNA. By in¬ voking an extreme version of the phylogenetic species concept, they suggested that each population should be ranked as a full species: E . glacialis , E.japonica, and E. australis, respectively. However, these nucle¬ otide substitutions have no discemable phenotypic ex¬ pression, and are probably selectively neutral; they cannot be construed as evidence of either prezygotic or postzygotic isolating mechanisms. No other con¬ sistent differences have been found between the three populations, so under the biological species concept all three must be regarded as members of a single bio¬ logical species, Eubalaena glacialis, Delphinidae, —Wilson and Ruff (1999) did not include an account for Peponocephata electra. This species was added to the checklist in 1997 based on reports of the species from Texas and Maryland (Barron and Jefferson, 1993). LeDuc et al. (1999) proposed a revised classifi¬ cation of the Delphinidae based on a molecular sys- tematicsanalysis. Undertheirsystem, Lagenorhynchus acutus becomes Leucopleurus acutus , and Lagenorhynchus obliquidens becomes Sagmatias obliquidens. However, we follow most cetologists (Perrin et al., 2002) in holding these changes in abey¬ ance, pending further studies. Ziphiidae. —Dalebout et al. (2002) described a new species of beaked whale, Mesoplodon perrini, based on molecular studies of five animals stranded on the coast of California. All of the North American specimens previously identified as M. hectori are now recognized as M perrini. M, hectori is removed from the checklist because, as it is now understood, M. hectori occurs only in the southern hemisphere. Kogiidae, —Wilson and Ruff (1999) did not rec¬ ognize the family Kogiidae for the pygmy sperm whales. We follow Rice (1998) in continuing to rec¬ ognize this family. 8 Occasional Papers, Museum of Texas Tech University ARTIODACTYLS Suidae .— The genetic history of the stocks that gave rise to Sus scrofa populations in North America represent two different histories. Wild boar have been introduced that have not been through any artificial selection process and probably are indistinguishable from native populations in Europe and Asia. Alterna¬ tively, there have been many releases of artificially se¬ lected breeds of pigs that have established feral popu¬ lations. What is present in free-ranging herds is an interbreeding combination of these stocks in various degrees of genetic recombination. In most areas, fe¬ ral pigs are primarily derivatives of domestic stocks. Cervidae ,—We have accepted the recommen¬ dation of Geist (1998), further supported by Randi et al. (2001), that the wapiti of North America and east¬ ern Asia be recognized as specifically distinct ( Cervus canadensis ) from the red deer of western Eurasia (Cervus elaphus). Bovidae .— -Although he noted the controversy surrounding the generic placement of the American bison, Shaw (1999) continued to classify the species in the genus Bison. Shaw (1999) provided no sup¬ porting data for this arrangement, however, whereas several studies have supported the placement of Bison in synonomy with Bos (see Jones et al., 1997). Thus, we continue to recognize the American bison as Bos bison. Checklist Although several authors, including Wilson and Ruff (1999), have adopted a different sequence for the phylogeny of mammals, we have chosen to present this checklist in the same phylogenetic sequence as on the previous checklist (Jones et al., 1997), and to again arrange the species alphabetically within each genus. The intent of this arrangement is to facilitate use of the checklist and comparison with previous revisions of the checklist. As in previous revisions, non-native species are identified by an asterisk. ORDER D1DELPHIMORPHIA - Opossums Family Didelphidae - Opossums Didelphisvirginiana ........ ORDER INSECTIVORA — Insectivores Family Soricidac - Shrews Sorex alaskanus ____ Sore* arcticus ... Sorexarizonae ... Sorex bairdii .. Sorex bendirii .... Sorex cinereus ... Sorex dispar .... Sorexfontinalis ... Sorex fumeus ... Sorex gaspensis. . Sorexkaydeni... . Sorex koyi. .. Sorexjacksoni .... Sorex longirostris ... Sorexlyelli.... . Sorex maritimensis... . Sorex merriami .... Sorex monticolus . Sorex nanus ... Sorex neomexicanus . Virginia Opossum . Glacier Bay Water Shrew . Arctic Shrew . Arizona Shrew . Baird’s Shrew . Pacific Water or Marsh Shrew . Cinereus or Masked Shrew . Long-tailed or Rock Shrew . Maryland Shrew . Smoky Shrew . Gaspe Shrew . Hayden’s or Prairie Shrew . Pygmy Shrew . St. Lawrence Island Shrew . Southeastern Shrew . Mt. Lyell Shrew . Maritime Shrew . Merriam’s Shrew . Dusky or Montane Shrew . Dwarf Shrew . New Mexico Shrew Baker et al.— Checklist of North American Mammals, 2003 9 Sorex ornatus ....... Sorex pacificus .... Sorex palustris ... Sorex preblei ...... Sorex pribilofen sis ..... Sorex sonomae ...... Sorextenellus ...... Sorex trowbridgii ... Sorex tundrensis ...... Sorex ugyunak,,. .. Sorex vagrans ....... Sorex yukonicus ....... Blarina brevicauda .... Blarina carolinensis .... Blarina hylophaga ......... Cryptotis parva ...... Notiosorexcockrumi ..... Notiosorex crawfordi ..... Family Talpidae - Moles Neurotrichus gibbsii .... Scapanus latimanus ....... Scapanus orarius ..... Scapanus townsendii ... Parascalops brewer i ..... Scalopus aquaticus .... Condylura cristala ..... ORDER CHIROPTERA - Bats Family Mormoopidae - Leaf-chinned Bats Mormoops megalop hylla ... Family Phyilostomidae - New World Leaf-nosed Bats Macrotus californicus ..... Choeronycteris mexicana . .. Leptonycteris curasoae .... Leptonycteris nivalis ... Diphylla ecaudala ..... Family Vespertilionidae - Vesper Bats Myotis auriculus ..... Myotis austroriparius ... Myotis californicus . Myotis ciliolabrum ...,. Myotisevotis ..... Myotis grisescens ... Myotis keenii ....... Myotis leibii ..... Myotis lucifugus ...... Myotis occultus ....... Myotis septen tr ionalis ... Myotis sodalis .... Myotis thysanodes ..... Myotis velifer . Myotis volans ..... Myotis yumanensis . Lasiurus blossevillii ... Lasiurus borealis ..... Lasiurus cinereus ... Lasiurus ega ............. Ornate Shrew Pacific Shrew American Water Shrew Preble’s Shrew Pribilof Island Shrew Fog Shrew Inyo Shrew Trowbridge’s Shrew Tundra Shrew Barren Ground Shrew Vagrant Shrew Alaska Tiny Shrew Northern Short-tailed Shrew Southern Short-tailed Shrew Elliot’s Short-tailed Shrew Least Shrew Cockrurn’s Desert Shrew Crawford’s Desert Shrew American Shrew Mole Broad-footed Mole Coast Mole Townsend’s Mole Hairy-tailed Mole Eastern Mole Star-nosed Mole Ghost-faced Bat California Leaf-nosed Bat Mexican Long-tongued Bat Southern Long-nosed Bat Mexican Long-nosed Bat Hairy-legged Vampire Bat Southwestern Myotis Southeastern Myotis California Myotis Western Small-footed Myotis Long-eared Myotis Gray Myotis Keen’s Myotis Eastern Small-footed Myotis Little Brown Myotis Arizona Myotis Northern Long-eared Myotis Indiana Bat or Social Myotis Fringed Myotis Cave Myotis Long-legged Myotis Yuma Myotis Western Red Bat Eastern Red Bat Hoary Bat Southern Yellow Bat 10 Occasional Papers, Museum of Texas Tech University Lasiurus intermedius ...... Lasiurus seminolus ... Lasiurus xanthinus ..... Lasionycteris noctivagans ..... Pipistrellus Hesperus ... Pipistrellus subjlavus . Eptesicusfuscus .... Nycticeius humeralis ..... Euderma maculatum .... Corynorhinus raftnesquii .... Corynorhinus townsendii ... Idionycteris phyllotis . Antrozouspallidus . .... Family Molossidae - Free-tailed Bats Tadarida brasiliensis ... Nyctinomopsfemorosaccus . Nyciinomops macrotis ... Eumops glaucin us ..... Eumops perotis ...... Eumopsunderwoodi ..... Molossus molossus ...... ORDER PRIMATES - Primates Family Cercopithecidae - Old World Monkeys Macaco fuscata* ..... Macaca mulatto* .. Family Hominidae - Great Apes and Humans Homo sapiens .... .. ORDER XENARTHRA - Armadillos, Anteaters, and Sloths Family Dasypodidae - Armadillos Dayspus novemcinctus... ... ORDER LAGOMORPHA - Pikas, Hares, and Rabbits Family Ochotonidae - Pikas Ochotona collaris ....... Ochotonaprinceps .... Family Leporidae - Hares and Rabbits Brachylagusidahoensis ..... Sylvilagus aquaticus . Sylvilagus audubonii .... Sylvilagus bachmani .. Sylvilagus Jloridanus .... Sylvilagus nuttallii ..... Sylvilagus obscurus .... Sylvilagus palustris . Sylvilagus robustus ..... Sylvilagustransitionalis.... .... Oryctolagus cuniculus* .... Lepusalleni. ....... Lepus americanus. .. Lepus arcticus ...... Lepus californicus ..... Lepus callotis ...... Lepus europaeus* ... Lepus othus. ...... Lepus townsendii .... Northern Yellow Bat Seminole Bat Western Yellow Bat Silver-haired Bat Western Pipistrelle Eastern Pipistrelle Big Brown Bat Evening Bat Spotted Bat Rafinesque’s Big-eared Bat Townsend’s Big-eared Bat Allen’s Big-eared Bat Pallid Bat Brazilian Free-tailed Bat Pocketed Free-tailed Bat Big Free-tailed Bat Wagner’s Bonneted Bat Western Bonneted Bat Underwood’s Bonneted Bat Velvety Free-tailed Bat Japanese Macaque Rhesus Macaque Modem Man Nine-banded Armadillo Collared Pika American Pika Pygmy Rabbit Swamp Rabbit Desert Cottontail Brush Rabbit Eastern Cottontail Mountain Cottontail Appalachian Cottontail Marsh Rabbit Davis Mountains Cottontail New England Cottontail European Rabbit Antelope Jackrabbit Snowshoe Hare Arctic Hare Black-tailed Jackrabbit White-sided Jackrabbit European Hare Alaskan Hare White-tailed Jackrabbit Baker et al.— Checklist of North American Mammals, 2003 11 ORDER RODENTIA - Rodents Family Aplodontiidae - Mountain Beaver Aplodontiarufa .... . Fami ly Sciuridae - Squirrels Neotamias alpinus..... ........... Neotamias amoenus . Neotamias canipes . Neotamias cinereicollis . ... Neotamias dorsalis .. Neotamias merriami . Neotamias minimus ... Neotamias obscurus . Neotamias ochrogenys .. Neotamias palmer i.. . Neotamias panamintinus... . Neotamias quadrimaculatus . Neotamiasquadrivittatus. . Neotamias ruficaudus .... Neotamias rufus. ... Neotamias senex ... Neotamias siskiyou .. Neotamias sonomae ... Neotamias speciosus .. Neotamias townsendii ... Neotamias umbrinus .. Tamias striatus ... Marmot a broweri.... . Marmota caligata ... Marmoia flaviventris . . Marmota monax ... Marmota Olympus. .. Marmota vancouverensis .. Ammospermophilus harrisii...... Ammospermophilus inter pres .... Ammospermophilus leucurus..... Ammospermophilus nelsoni .. Spermophilus armatus .. Spermophilusheecheyi. .. Spermophilus beldingi . Spermophilus brunneus .. Spermophilus canus ., Spermophilus columbianus .. Spermophilus elegans .. Spermophilusfranklinii . Spermophilus lateralis . Spermophilus mexicanus .. Spermophilus mohavensis . Spermophilus mollis ..... Spermophilus parryii . Spermophilus richardsonii . Spermophilus saturatus .. Spermophilus spilosoma . Spermophilus tereticaudus......... Spermophilus townsendii . Spermophilus tridecemlineatus... Spermophilus variegatus . Spermophilus Washington!... . . Sewellel or Mountain Beaver . Alpine Chipmunk . Yellow-pine Chipmunk . Gray-footed Chipmunk Gray-collared Chipmunk . Cliff Chipmunk . Memam’s Chipmunk Least Chipmunk . California Chipmunk . Yellow-cheeked Chipmunk . Palmer's Chipmunk . Panamint Chipmunk . Long-eared Chipmunk Colorado Chipmunk . Red-tailed Chipmunk - Hopi Chipmunk . Allen's Chipmunk Siskiyou Chipmunk Sonoma Chipmunk Lodgepole Chipmunk Townsend’s Chipmunk Uinta Chipmunk Eastern Chipmunk Alaska Marmot Hoary Marmot Yellow-bellied Marmot Woodchuck Olympic Marmot Vancouver Marmot Harris’s Antelope Squirrel Texas Antelope Squirrel White-tailed Antelope Squirrel Nelson’s Antelope Squirrel Uinta Ground Squirrel California Ground Squirrel Belding’s Ground Squirrel Idaho Ground Squirrel Columbia Plateau Ground Squirrel Columbian Ground Squirrel Wyoming Ground Squirrel Franklin’s Ground Squirrel Golden-mantled Ground Squirrel Mexican Ground Squirrel Mohave Ground Squirrel Great Basin Ground Squirrel Arctic Ground Squirrel Richardson’s Ground Squirrel Cascade Ground Squirrel Spotted Ground Squirrel Round-tailed Ground Squirrel Townsend’s Ground Squirrel Thirteen-lined Ground Squirrel Rock Squirrel Washington Ground Squirrel 12 Occasional Papers, Museum of Texas Tech University Cynomysgunnisoni..... ... Cynomys leucurus ... Cynomys ludovicianus ..... Cynomys parvidens ........ Sciurus aberti .... Sciurus arizonensis ..... Sciurus aureogaster* .... ... Sciurus carolinensis ........ Sciurus griseus.......... ...... Sciurus nayaritensis ..... Sciurus niger ..... Tamiasciurus douglasii .. Tamiasciurus h udson icus .... Glaucomys sabrinus ...... Glaucomys volans ..... Family Geomyidae - Pocket Gophers Thomomys bottae ....... Thomomys bulbivorus ... ..... Thomomys clusius ...... Thomomys idahoensis .... Thomomys mazama ...... Thomomys monticola ..... Thomomys talpoides ..... Thomomys townsendii ..... Thomomys umbrinus .... Geomys arenarius ..... Geomys attwateri. . Geomys breviceps ... Geomys bursarius ... Geomysknoxjonesi. ... Geomys personatus. ...... Geomys pinetis ..... Geomys streckeri .... Geomys texensis ..... Cratogeomys castanops ........ Family Heterotnyidae - Pocket Mice and Kangaroo Rats Perognathus altieolus ... Perognathus amplus ...... Perognathus fasciatus ..... Perognathusjlavescens... ..... Perognathusflavus ........ Perognathus inornatus ..... Perognathus longimembris ..... Perognathus merriami .... Perognathus parvus. ...... Chaetodipus bailey i ...... Chaetodipus califomicus ...... Chaetodipus eremicus .... Chaetodipusfallax .... Chaetodipus formosus .... Chaetodipus kispidus .... Chaetodipus intermedius ... Chaetodipus nelsoni ........ Chaetodipus penicillatus ... Chaetodiprudinoris ... ..... Chaetodipus spinatus. ..... Microdipodops megacep halu s ..... Microdipodops pallidus ... . Gunnison’s Prairie Dog White-tailed Prairie Dog . Black-tailed Prairie Dog . Utah Prairie Dog ■ Abert’s Squirrel . Arizona Gray Squirrel . Mexican Gray Squirrel . Eastern Gray Squirrel . Western Gray Squirrel ■ Mexican Fox Squirrel . Eastern Fox Squirrel Douglas’s Squirrel . Red Squirrel Northern Flying Squirrel . Southern Flying Squirrel Botta’s Pocket Gopher . Camas Pocket Gopher Wyoming Pocket Gopher Idaho Pocket Gopher Western Pocket Gopher Mountain Pocket Gopher Northern Pocket Gopher Townsend’s Pocket Gopher Southern Pocket Gopher Desert Pocket Gopher Attwater’s Pocket Gopher Baird’s Pocket Gopher Plains Pocket Gopher Jones’s Pocket Gopher Texas Pocket Gopher Southeastern Pocket Gopher Strecker’s Pocket Gopher Llano Pocket Gopher Yellow-faced Pocket Gopher White-eared Pocket Mouse Arizona Pocket Mouse Olive-backed Pocket Mouse Plains Pocket Mouse Silky Pocket Mouse San Joaquin Pocket Mouse Little Pocket Mouse Merriam’s Pocket Mouse Great Basin Pocket Mouse Bailey’s Pocket Mouse California Pocket Mouse Chihuahuan Desert Pocket Mouse San Diego Pocket Mouse Long-tailed Pocket Mouse Hispid Pocket Mouse Rock Pocket Mouse Nelson’s Pocket Mouse Sonoran Desert Pocket Mouse Baja Pocket Mouse Spiny Pocket Mouse Dark Kangaroo Mouse Pale Kangaroo Mouse Baker et al.— Checklist of North American Mammals, 2003 13 Dipodomys agilis . Dipodomys californicus .. Dipodomys compactus . Dipodomys deserti .. Dipodomys elator... ... Dipodomys heermanni . Dipodomys ingens ....... Dipodomys merriami . Dipodomys microps . Dipodomys nitratoides ... Dipodomys ordii ..... Dipodomys panaminiinus. . Dipodomys simuians .. Dipodomys spectabilis .. Dipodomys stephensi .. Dipodomys venustus Liomys irroratus ....... Family Castoridae - Beavers Castor canadensis ... Family Muridae - Mice, Rats, and Voles Oryzomys couesi ..... Oryzomys palustris . Reithrodontomysfulvescens ... Reithrodontomys humulis . Reith rodontomys megabits .... Reithrodontomys montanus .... Reithrodontomys raviventris,, Peromyscus attwateri .. Peromyscus boylii .. Peromyscus californicus .. Peromyscus crinitus ... Peromyscus eremicus ... Peromyscusfraterculus . Peromyscus gossypinus . Peromyscus gratus .. Peromyscus keeni. . Peromyscus leucopus .. Peromyscus maniculatus .. Peromyscus melon otis ............ Peromyscus merriami ... Peromyscus nasulus . Peromyscuspectoralis ..... Peromyscus polionotus .. Peromyscus truei ... Podomysfloridanus . Ochrotomys n u tta Hi ... Baiomys taylori ... Onychomys arenicola . Onychomys leucogaster . Onychomys torridus .. Sigmodon arizonae . Sigmodon fulviventer .. Sigmodon hispidus .. Sigmodon ochrognathus . Neotoma albigula . Neotomacinerea ....... Neotoma devia ... Neotoma jloridana ... Agile Kangaroo Rat California Kangaroo Rat Gulf Coast Kangaroo Rat Desert Kangaroo Rat Texas Kangaroo Rat Heermann’s Kangaroo Rat Giant Kangaroo Rat Merriam’s Kangaroo Rat Chisel-toothed Kangaroo Rat Fresno Kangaroo Rat Ord’s Kangaroo Rat Panamint Kangaroo Rat Dulzura Kangaroo Rat Banner-tailed Kangaroo Rat Stephen’s Kangaroo Rat Narrow-faced Kangaroo Rat Mexican Spiny Pocket Mouse American Beaver Coues’s Rice Rat Marsh Rice Rat Fulvous Harvest Mouse Eastern Harvest Mouse Western Harvest Mouse Plains Harvest Mouse Salt-marsh Harvest Mouse Texas Mouse Brush Mouse California Mouse Canyon Mouse Cactus Mouse Baja Mouse Cotton Mouse Osgood’s Mouse Keen’s Mouse White-footed Mouse Deer Mouse Black-eared Mouse Merriam’s Mouse Northern Rock Mouse White-ankled Mouse Oldfield Mouse Pinon Mouse Florida Mouse Golden Mouse Northern Pygmy Mouse Mearns’s Grasshopper Mouse Northern Grasshopper Mouse Southern Grasshopper Mouse Arizona Cotton Rat Tawny-belled Cotton Rat Hispid Cotton Rat Yellow-nosed Cotton Rat Western White-throated Wood rat Bushy-tailed Wood rat Arizona Woodrat Eastern Woodrat 14 Occasional Papers, Museum of Texas Tech University Neotomafuscipes .. Neotoma lepida .... Neotoma leucodon .... Neotoma macrotis ..... Neotoma magister ....... Neotoma mexicana . Neotoma micropus ...... Neotoma stephensi ... Rattus norvegicus* ... Rattus rattus* ... Mus musculus* .. Ctethrionomyscalifomicus..., .. Cleth rionomys gapperi ,..... Clethrionomys rutilus . A rborim us albipes .... Arborimus longicaudus .... Arborimusporno ....... Phenacomys intermedius ..... Phenacomys ungava .. Microtus abbreviatus .... Microtus breweri .... Microtus californicus .. Microtus canica udus . Microtus chrotorrhinus ... Microtus longicaudus . Microtus mogollonensis .. Microtus miurus ..... Microtus montanus ..... Microtus ochrogaster. . Microtus oeconomus .... Microtus oregoni .... Microtus Pennsylvania.is ..................... Microtus pinetorum ....... Microtus richardsoni ..... Microtus townsendii . Microtus xanth ogn ath us. . Lemmiscus curtatus ..... Neofiber alleni ... Ondatra zibethicus.. ... Lemmus trimucronatus ... Synaptomys borealis .... Synaptomys cooperi ... Dicrostonyx exsul ..... Dicrostonyx groentandicus.... .. Dicrostonyx hudsonius... . Dicrostonyx kilangmiutak . Dicrostonyx nelsoni ...... Dicrostonyxnunatakensis. . Dicrostonyx richardsoni ... Dicrostonyx rubricatus .. Dicrostonyx unalascensis . Family Zapodidae - Jumping Mice Zapus hudsonius .. Zapus princeps... .... Zapus trinotatus .... Napaeozapus ins ignis .. Family Erethizontidae - New World Porcupines Erethizon dorsatum. ..... Dusky-footed Woodrat Desert Woodrat Eastern White-throated Woodrat Large-eared Woodrat Appalachian Woodrat Mexican Woodrat Southern Plains Woodrat Stephens’s Woodrat Norway or Brown Rat Black or House Rat House Mouse Western Red-backed Vole Southern Red-backed Vole Northern Red-backed Vole White-footed Vole Red Tree Vole Sonoma Tree Vole Western Heather Vole Eastern Heather Vole Insular Vole Beach Vole California Vole Gray-tailed Vole Rock Vole Long-tailed Vole Mogollon Vole Singing Vole Montane Vole Prairie Vole Tundra Vole Creeping Vole Meadow Vole Woodland Vole Water Vole Townsend’s Vole Yellow-cheeked or Taiga Vole Sagebrush Vole Round-tailed Muskrat Common Muskrat Brown Lemming Northern Bog Lemming Southern Bog Lemming St. Lawrence Island Collared Lemming Peary Land Collared Lemming Labrador Collared Lemming Victoria Collared Lemming Nelson’s Collared Lemming Ogilvie Mountain Collared Lemming Richardson’s Collared Lemming Bering Collared Lemming Unalaska Collared Lemming Meadow Jumping Mouse Western Jumping Mouse Pacific Jumping Mouse Woodland Jumping Mouse North American Porcupine Baker et al.— Checklist of North American Mammals, 2003 15 Family Myocastoridae - Coypus Myocastor coypus* ... ORDER CARNIVORA - Carnivores Family Canidae - Dogs, Foxes, and Wolves Canisfamiliaris* .... Canis latrans ..... Canis lupus . ... Canis tycoon ... Canis rufus ........... Vu Ipes lagopus ..... Vu Ipes macrotis ... Vulpes velox ...... Vulpes vulpes ......... Urocyon cinereoargenteus ...... Urocyon littoralis ... Family Ursidae - Bears Ursus americanus......... .. Ursus arctos ....... Ursus maritimus ..... Family Otariidae- Eared Seals Callorhinus ursinus ........ A rctocep halus townsendi ... Eumetopiasjubatus ..... Zalophuscaliforniums ... Family Odobenidae - Walrus Odobenus rosmarus . ... Family Phocidae - Earless, True, or Hair Seals Phoca largha ... Phoca vitulina .... Pusa hispida.. ...... Halichoerus grypus ... Pagophilus groenlandicus ... Histriophoca fasciata ...... Erignathus barbatus .... Cystoph ora cristata ..... Monach us tropicalis ..... Mirounga angustirostris .... Family Procyonidae - Raccoons, Ringtails, and Coatis Bassariscus astutus .. Procyon lotor ....... Nasua narica.. ...... Family Mustelidae - Weasels, Otters, and Badgers Martes americana .... Maries pennanti ..... Mustela erminea............ ... Mustela frenata .... Mustela n igripes ...... Mustela nivalis ... Mustela putorius *.. Mustela vison .................. Gulogulo ....... Taxidea taxus ....... Lontra canadensis ..... En hydra lu tris . ..... Family Mephitidae - Skunks Spilogale gracilis ..... Spilogale putorius .,..... Nutria or Coypu Feral Dog Coyote Gray Wolf Eastern Timber Wolf Red Wolf Arctic Fox Kit Fox Swift Fox Red Fox Common Gray Fox Island Gray Fox American Black Bear Grizzly or Brown Bear Polar Bear Northern Fur-Seal Guadalupe Fur-Seal Northern or Steller’s Sea-Lion California Sea-Lion Walrus Spotted Seal Harbor Seal Ringed Seal Gray Seal Harp Seal Ribbon Seal Bearded Seal Hooded Seal Caribbean or West Indian Monk Seal Northern Elephant Seal Ringtail Northern Raccoon White-nosed Coati American Marten Fisher Ermine or Short-tailed Weasel Long-tailed Weasel Black-footed Ferret Least Weasel European Ferret American Mink Wolverine American Badger Northern River Otter Sea Otter Western Spotted Skunk Eastern Spotted Skunk 16 Occasional Papers, Museum of Texas Tech University Mephitis macroura ... Mephitis mephitis .*. Conepatus leuconotus . Family Felidae - Cats Feliscatus* ...... Puma concolor . Leopardus pardalis . Leopardus wiedii ..... Herpailurus yaguarondi . Lynx canadensis ... Lynx rufus .. .... Panther a onca ... ORDER CETACEA - Whales Family Eschrichtiidae - Gray Whale Eschrichtius robustu s .. Family Balaenopteridae - Rorquals Balaenoptera acutorostrata . Balaenoptera borealis. . Balaenoptera brydei . Balaenoptera musculus .. Balaenopteraphysalus. .. Megaptera novaeangliae ................ Family Balaenidae- Right Whales Eubalaenaglacialis . .... Balaena mysticetus .. Family Monodontidae — Beluga and Narwhal Delp h inapterus leucas. .. Monodon monoceros .... Family Delphinidae- Dolphins Steno bredanens is .. Turstops truncatus .. Stenella attenuata ... Stenella clymene .... Stenella coeruleoalba .. Stenellafrontalis. . Stenella longirostris . ...... Delpkinus capensis ... Delphinus delphis . Lagenodelphis hosei .. Lagenorhynchus acutus . Lagenorhynchus albirostris . Lagen orhyn chus obliquidens . Grampus griseus ... Peponocephala electra . Feresa attenuata ... Pseudorca crassidens ... Globiceph a la macrorhyn chus ....... Glo bicephala me las...... . Orcinus orca ...... Lissodelphis borealis .. Family Phocoenidae - Porpoises Phocoenaphocoena . .. Phocoenoides dalli. . Family Ziphiidae — Beaked Whales Berardius bairdii .... Ziphius cavirostris ..... Hooded Skunk Striped Skunk White-backed Hog-nosed Skunk Feral Cat Mountain Lion or Puma Ocelot Mar gay Jaguarundi Canada Lynx Bobcat Jaguar Gray Whale Northern Minke Whale Sei Whale Bryde’s Whale Blue Whale FinWhale Humpback Whale Right Whale Bowhead Whale White Whale or Beluga Narwhal Rough-toothed Dolphin Bottlenose Dolphin Pantropical Spotted Dolphin Clymene Dolphin Striped Dolphin Atlantic Spotted Dolphin Spinner Dolphin Long-beaked Saddleback Dolphin Short-beaked Saddleback Dolphin Fraser’s Dolphin Atlantic White-sided Dolphin White-beaked Dolphin Pacific White-sided Dolphin Risso’s Dolphin or Grampus Melon-headed Whale Pygmy Killer Whale False Killer Whale Short-finned Pilot Whale Long-tinned Pilot Whale Killer Whale Northern Right-whale Dolphin Harbor Porpoise Dali’s Porpoise North Pacific Bottlenose Whale Goose-beak Whale Baker et al.— Checklist of North American Mammals, 2003 17 Hyperoodon ampullatus ... Mesoplodon bidens ..... Mesoplodon carlh ubbsi .. Mesoplodon densirostris ... Mesoplodon europaeus . Mesoplodon ginkgodens ... Mesoplodon mints .... Mesoplodon perrin i .... Mesoplodon stejnegeri ... Family Kogiidae - Pygmy Sperm Whales Kogia brev 'tceps ... Kogia sima ..... Family Physeteridae - Sperm Whales Physeter macrocep halu s . ORDER S1RENIA — Sea Cows Family Trichechidae - Manatees Trichechus manatus ..... ORDER PERISSOD ACTYLA - Odd-toed Ungulates Family Equidae - Horses and Asses Equus asinus* .. Equus caballus* ........ ORDER ARTIODACTYLA - Even-toed Ungulates FamilySuidae-Pigs Sus scrofa* .... Family Tayassuidae - Peccaries Pecari tajacu . Family Cervidae - Deer Axis axis* ...... Dama dama* ......... Cervus canadensis .. Cervus nippon* ..... Cervus unicolor* ..... Odocoileus hemionus .... Odocoileus virginianus ......... Alcesalces ..... Rangifer tarandus ... Family Antilocapridae - Pronghorn Antilocapra americana ..... Family Bovidae - Cattle, Antelope, Sheep, and Goats Bos bison ..... Bos taurus* ..... Boselaphus tragocamelus* .. Oryxgazella* .... Antilope eervicapra* .... Hemitragusjemlahicus* ... Capra hircus* ..... Capra ibex *.... Oreamnos americanus. ... Ovibos moschatus ........ OWs aries* ....... Ovis can adensis .... Ovis dalli .... Ammotragus lervia* ..... North Atlantic Bottlenose Whale Sowerby’s Beaked Whale Hubb’s Beaked Whale Blainville’s Beaked Whale Gervais’s Beaked Whale Ginkgo-toothed Whale True's Beaked Whale Perrin’s Beaked Whale Stejneger “s Beaked Whale Pygmy Sperm Whale Dwarf Sperm Whale Sperm Whale West Indian or Caribbean Manatee Feral Ass Feral Horse Feral Pig or Wild Boar Collared Peccary Axis Deer Fallow Deer Wapiti or Elk Sika Deer SambarDeer Mule or Black-tailed Deer White-tailed Deer Moose Caribou Pronghorn American Bison Domestic Cattle Nilgai Gemsbok Blackbuck Himalayan Tahr Goat Ibex Mountain Goat Muskox European Mouflon Sheep Mountain or Bighorn Sheep Dali’s or Thinhom Sheep Barb ary Sheep or Aoudad 18 Occasional Papers, Museum of Texas Tech University Acknowledgments The authors thank Robert C. Dowler and Frederick B. Stangl, Jr., for their timely and valuable reviews of this manuscript, and Jackie Chavez for her patience and dedication to producing a quality prod¬ uct. We would like to thank Tanya E. Dewey and Sarah E. Weyandt for use of their unpublished materi¬ als. This publication was supported in part by Texas Tech University for studies of biodiversity. Literature Cited Alexander, L. F, 1996. A morphometric analysis of geo¬ graphic variation within Sorex monticolus (Insectivora: Soricidae). University of Kansas Publication, Museum of Natural History, 88:1-54. Arbogast, B. S. 1999. Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of the New World flying squir¬ rels ( Glaucomys ): implications for Pleistocene biogeography. Journal of Mammalogy, 80:142- 155. Arbogast, B. S., R, A. Browne, and P. D. Weigh 2001. Evolutionary genetics and Pleistocene biogeog- raphy of North American tree squirrels (Tamiasciurus), Journal of Mammalogy, 82:302- 319. Avise, J. C., and D. Walker. 1999. Species realities and numbers in sexual vertebrates: perspectives from an asexually transmitted genome. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 96:992-995. Baker, R. J., M. B. O’Neill, andL. R. McAliley. 2003. Anew species of desert shrew, Notiosorex, based on nuclear and mitochondrial sequence data. Occa¬ sional Papers, The Museum of Texas Tech Uni¬ versity, 222:1-12. Baker, R. J. } J. C. Patton, H. H. Genoways, and J. W. Bickham. 1988. Genic studies of Lasiurus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Occasional Pa¬ pers, The Museum of Texas Tech University, 117:1-15. Baker, R. J, 2002. Editor’s comment, P. i, in A new Central American species from the Carollia brevicauda complex (R. J. Baker, S. Solari, and F, G Hoffmann, authors). Occasional Papers, The Museum of Texas Tech University, 217:1-11. Barron, G. L., and T. A, Jefferson, 1993. First records of the melon-headed whale (Peponocephala electra ) from the Gulf of Mexico. Southwestern Natural¬ ist, 38:82-85. Batzli,G. O. 1999, Brown lemming, Lemmussibiricus, Pp. 653-654, in The Smithsonian book of North Ameri¬ can mammals (D. E. Wilson and S, Ruff, eds,), Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., xxv + 750 pp. Best, T. L., R. K. Chesser, D. A. McCullough, and G D. Baumgardner, 1996. Genic and morphometric variation in kangaroo rats, genus Dipodomys, from coastal California. Journal of Mammalogy, 77:785-800. Best, T. L. 1999. Narrow-faced kangaroo rat, Dipodomys venustus. Pp, 545-546, in The Smithsonian book of North American mammals (D. E. Wilson and S. Ruff, eds.), Smithsonian Institution Press, Wash¬ ington, D.C., xxv + 750 pp. Bogdanowicz, W., S. Kasper, and R. D. Owen. 1998. Phy- logeny of plecotine bats: reevaluation of mor¬ phological and chromosomal data. Journal of Mammalogy, 79:78-90. Bradley, R. D., and R. J. Baker. 2001. A test of the Genetic Species Concept: cytochrome-6 sequences and mammals. Journal of Mammalogy, 82:960-973. Brunet, A. K., R, M. Zink, K. M. Kramer, R. C. Blackwell- Rago, S. L. Farrell, T. V. Line, and E. C. Bimey. 2002. Evidence of introgression between masked shrews ( Sorex cinereus ), and prairie shrews ( S . haydeni ), in Minnesota. American Midland Natu¬ ralist, 147:116-122. Carraway, L. N. 1995. A key to Recent Soricidae of the western United States and Canada based prima¬ rily on dentaries. Occasional Papers of the Natu¬ ral History Museum, University of Kansas, 175:1- 49. Clapham, P. 1999. Family Balaenidae. P. 241, in The Smithsonian book of North American mammals (D. E. Wilson and S. Ruff, eds.), Smithsonian In¬ stitution Press, Washington, D.C., xxv + 750 pp. Baker et al.— Checklist of North American Mammals, 2003 19 Dalebout, M, L., 1G Mead, C. S. Baker, A. N. Baker, and A. L. van Helden. 2002. A new species of beaked whale Mesoplodon perrini sp. n. (Cetacea: Ziphiidae) discovered through phylogenetic analyses of mitochondrial DNA sequences. Marine Mammal Science, 18:577-608. Demboski, J. R., and J, A. Cook. 2003. Phylogenetic diver¬ sification within the Sorex cinereus group (Soricidae). Journal of Mammalogy, 84:144-158. Dizon, A., C. A. Lux, R. G LeDuc, J. UrbanR., M. Henshaw, and R. Brownell, Jr. 1996. An interim phyloge¬ netic an ay lysis of sei and Bryde’s whales mito¬ chondrial DNA control region sequences. Re¬ port of the International Whaling Commission, 46:669. Dizon, A., C. A. Lux, R. G LcDuc, J. Urban R., M. Henshaw, C. S. Baker, F, Cipriano, and R. Brownell, Jr, 1998. Molecular phylogeny of the Bryde’s whale/sei whale complex: Separate species status for the pygmy Bryde’s form? Report of the International Whaling Commission, 47:398. Dobzhansky, T, 1950. Mendelian populations and their evolution. American Naturalist, 74:312-321. Dokuchaev, N. E. 1997. An ew species of shrew (Soricidae, Insectivora) from Alaska. Journal of Mammal¬ ogy, 78:811-817. Dragoo, J. W., R, L, Honeycutt, and D. J. Schmidly. 2003. Taxonomic status of white-backed hog-nosed skunks, genus Conepatus (Carnivora: Mephitidae). Journal of Mammalogy, 84:159-176. Dragoo, J. W., and R. K. Wayne. 2003. Systematics and population genetics of swift and kit foxes. Pp. 207-222, in The swift fox: ecology and conserva¬ tion of swift foxes in a changing world (M. A, Sovada and L. Carbyn, eds.), Canadian Plains Research Center, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan. Edwards, C. W., C. F. Fulhorst, and R. D. Bradley. 2001. Molecular phylogenetics of the Neotoma albigula species group: further evidence of a paraphyletic assemblage. Journal of Mammal¬ ogy, 82:267-279. Engstrom, M. D. 1999. Collared lemmings, Dicrosionyx. Pp. 658-659, in The Smithsonian book of North American mammals (D. E. Wilson and S, Ruff, eds.), Smithsonian Institution Press, Washing¬ ton, D.C., xxv + 750 pp. Frank, P. A. 1997. First record of Molossus molossus tropidorhynchus Gray (1839) from the United States. Journal of Mammalogy, 78:103-105. Frey, J. K. 1999. Mogollon vole, Microtus mogollonesis. Pp. 634-635, in The Smithsonian book of North American mammals (D. E. Wilson and S. Ruff, eds.), Smithsonian Institution Press, Washing¬ ton, D.C., xxv + 750 pp. Frey, J. K., and D. W. Moore, 1990. Nongeographic varia¬ tion in the Mexican vole {Microtus mexicanus). Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science, 93:97-109. Frost, D. R., and R. M, Timm. 1992, Phylogeny of pi ecotine bats (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae): summary of the evidence and proposal of a logically consis¬ tent taxonomy. American Museum Novitates, 3034:1016. Geffen, E,, A. Mercure, D. J. Ginnan, D. W. Macdonald, and R. K, Wayne. 1992. Phylogenetic relation¬ ships of the fox-like canids. Journal of Zoology, 228:27-39. Geist, V. 1998. Deer of the world: their evolution, behav¬ ior, and ecology. Stackpole Books, Meehanicsburg, Pennsylvania. 421 pp. George, S. B, 1988, Systematics, historical bio geography, and evolution of the genus Sorex. Journal of Mammalogy, 7 8:103-105. George, S. B. 1999. Montane shrew, Sorex monticolus , Pp. 31-33, in The Smithsonian book of North American mammals (D. E. Wilson and S. Ruff, eds.), Smithsonian Institution Press, Washing¬ ton, D.C., xxv + 750 pp. Halanych, K. M., J. R. Demboski, B. J. van Vuuren, D. R, Klein, and J. A. Cook. 1999. Cytochromephy¬ logeny of North American hares and jackrabbits (Lepus, Lagomorpha) and the effects of satura¬ tion in outgroup taxa. Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution, 11:213-221. Harris, A. H. 1999. Water shrew, Sorex palustris. Pp. 38- 39, in The Smithsonian book of North American mammals (D. E. Wilson and S. Ruff, eds.), Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., xxv + 750 pp, Hoffmann, R. S. 1999. Pribilof Island shrew, Sorex hydrodromus. Pp. 27-28, in The Smithsonian book of North American mammals (D, E. Wilson and S, Ruff, eds.), Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C,, xxv + 750 pp. Hogan, K. M., S. K. Davis, and I. F. Greenbaum. 1997. Mitochondrial-DNA analysis of the systematic relationships within the Peromyscus maniculatus species group. Journal of Mammalogy, 78:733- 743. 20 Occasional Papers, Museum of Texas Tech University Hoofer, S, R., and R, A. Van Den Bussche. 2001. Phyloge¬ netic relationships of plecotine bats and allies based on mitochondrial ribosomal sequences. Journal of Mammalogy, 82:131-137. Hutterer, R, 1993. Order Insectivora. Pp. 69-130, in Mam¬ mal species of the world: a taxonomic and geo¬ graphic reference (D. E. Wilson and D. M. Reeder, eds,), Smithsonian Institution Press, Washing¬ ton, D.C., xviii + 1206 pp. Jameson, E. W., Jr. 1999. Host-ectoparasite relationships among North American chipmunks. Acta Theriologica, 44:225-231. Jarrell, G. H., and K. Fredga. 1993. How many kinds of lemmings? A taxonomic overview. Pp. 45-57, in The biology of the lemmings (N, C. Stenseth and R. A. Ims, eds.), Linnean Society Symposium Series, no. 15, Academic Press, London, 683 pp. Jolley, T. W., R. L. Honeycutt, and R. D. Bradley. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships of pocket gophers (genus Geomys) based on the mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene. Journal of Mammalogy, 81:1025-1034. Jones, C, R. S. Hoffmann, D. W. Rice, M. D. Engstrom, R, D. Bradley, D. J. Schmidly, C. A. Jones, and R. J. Baker. 1997. Revised checklist of North Ameri¬ can mammals north of Mexico, 1997. Occasional Papers, The Museum of Texas Tech University, 173:1-19. Jones, J, K., Jr., D. C, Carter, and H. H. Genoways. 1973. Checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico. Occasional Papers, The Museum of Texas Tech University, 12:1-14. Jones, J, K., Jr., D. C. Carter, and H. H. Genoways. 1975. Revised checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico. Occasional Papers, The Mu¬ seum of Texas Tech University, 28:1-14. Jones, J, K,, Jr., D. C. Carter, and H. H. Genoways. 1979. Revised checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico, 1979. Occasional Papers, The Museum of Texas Tech University, 62:1-17, Jones, J, K., Jr., D. C. Carter, H. H. Genoways, R. S. Hoffmann, and D. W. Rice, 1982. Revised check¬ list of North American mammals north of Mexico, 1982. Occasional Papers, The Museum of Texas Tech University, 80:1-22, Jones, J, K., Jr., D, C. Carter, H. H. Genoways, R. S. Hoffmann, D. W. Rice, and C. Jones. 1986. Checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico, 1986. Occasional Papers, The Museum of Texas Tech University, 107:1-22, Jones, J, K.., Jr., R, S. Hoffmann, D. W. Rice, C. Jones, R, J, Baker, and M. D, Engstrom. 1992. Revised check¬ list of North American mammals north of Mexico, 1991. Occasional Papers, The Museum of Texas Tech University, 146:1 -23. Kurta, A. 1999, Southern yellow bat, Lasiurus ega . Pp. 107-109, in The Smithsonian book of North Ameri¬ can mammals (D. E. Wilson and S, Ruff, eds.), Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., xxv + 750 pp. LeDuc, R. G, W. F. Perrin, and A, E, Dizon. 1999. Phyloge¬ netic relationships among the delphinoid ceta¬ ceans based on full cytochrome b sequences. Marine Mammal Science, 15:619-648. Lee, T. E., Jr., B. R, Riddle, and P. L. Lee. 1996. Speciation in the desert pocket mouse (Chaetodipus penicillatus Woodhouse). Journal of Mammal¬ ogy, 77:58-68. Matocq, M. D. 2002. Morphological and molecular analy¬ sis of a contact zone in the Neotoma fuscipes species complex. Journal of Mammalogy, 83:866- 883. May den, R. L. 1997, A hierarchy of species concepts: the denouement in the saga of the species problem. Pp. 381-424, in Species: the units of biodiversity. (M. F. Claridge, H. A. Dawah, and M. R. Wilson, eds.). Chapman and Hall, New York. Mayr, E, 1969. Principles of systematic zoology. McGraw- Hill, New York. Mercure, A., K, Ralls, K. P. Koepfli, and R. K. Wayne. 1993. Genetic subdivisions among small canids: mitochondrial DNA differentiation of swift, kit, and arctic foxes. Evolution, 47:1313-1328. Patton, J. L., and S, T. Alvarez-Castaneda. In press. Phylogeography of the desert woodrat, Neotoma lepida, with comments on systematics and bio¬ geographic history. Pp. xx-xx, in Contribuciones mastozoologicas en honor de Bernardo Villa (V. Sanchez-Cordero and R. Medellin, eds.), Institute de Biologia, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico, D. F. Perrin, W, F., B. Wursig, and J. G S. Thewissen, (eds.). 2002. Encyclopedia of marine mammals. Aca¬ demic Press, San Diego, 1414 pp. Piaggio, A. J., and G. S. Spicer, 2001. Molecular phylog- eny of the chipmunks inferred from mitochon¬ drial cytochrome b and cytochrome oxidase II gene sequences. Molecular Phytogeny and Evo¬ lution, 20:335-350. Baker et al,— Checklist of North American Mammals, 2003 21 Piaggio, A, J., E. W. Valdez, M. A. Bogan, and G S. Spicer. 2002. Systematics of Myotis occultus (ChiToptera: Vespertilionidae) inferred from se¬ quences of two mitochondrial genes. Journal of Mammalogy, 83:386-395. Price, M. V. 1999, Desert pocket mouse, Chaeto dipus penicillatus. Pp. 516-517, in The Smithsonian book of North American mammals (D. E. Wilson and S. Ruff, eds.), Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., xxv +750 pp. Randi, E., N. Mucci, F, Claro-Hergueta, A. Bonnet, and E. J. P. Douzery. 2001. A mitochondrial DNA con¬ trol region phylogeny for the Cervinae: specia- tion in Cervus and its implications for conserva¬ tion. Animal Conservation, 4:Nil. Rausch, R. L,, and V. R. Rausch. 1995. The taxonomic status of the shrew of St. Lawrence Island, Bering Sea (Mammalia: Soricidae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 108:717-728. Rausch, R. L, and V. R. Rausch. 1997. Evidence for spe¬ cific independence of the shrew (Mammalia: Soricidae) of St. Paul Island (Pribilof Islands, Bering Sea). Zeitschrift fur Saugetierkunde, 62:193-202. Rice, D. W. 1998. Marine mammals of the world: system¬ atics and distribution. Society of Marine Mam¬ malogy, Special Publication, 4:1 -231. Rice, D. W, 1999. Bryde’s whale, Balaenoptera edeni , Pp. 249-251, in The Smithsonian book of North American mammals (D. E. Wilson and S. Ruff, eds.), Smithsonian Institution Press, Washing¬ ton, D.C., xxv + 750 pp. Riddle, B, R., D. J. Hafner, and L. F. Alexander. 2000a. Comparative phylogeography of Baileys' Pocket Mouse (Chaetodipus bailey i) and the Peromyscus eremicus species group: historical vicariance of the Baja California Peninsular Desert. Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution, 17:161 -172, Riddle, B. R., D. J. Hafner, and L. F. Alexander. 2000b. Phylogeography and systematics of the Peromyscus eremicus species group and the his¬ torical biogeography of North American warm regional deserts. Molecular Phylogeny and Evo¬ lution, 17:145-160. Rosenbaum, H. C., R. L, Brownwell, Jr,, M. W. Brown, C. Schaeff, V, Portway, B. N. White, S. Malik, L. A. Pastene, N, J, Patenaude, C, S. Baker, M. Goto, P. B. Best, P. J. Clapbam, P. Hamilton, M. Moore, R. Payne, V. Rowntree, C. T. Tynan, J. L. Bannister, and R. DeSalle. 2000, World-wide genetic differ¬ entiation of Eubalaencr. questioning the number of right whale species. Molecular Ecology, 9:1793-1802. Ruedas, L. A. 1998. Systematics of Sylvilagus Gray, 1867 (Lagomorpha: Leporidae) from southwestern North America. Journal of Mammalogy, 79:1355- 1378, Shaw, J. H. 1999. American bison, Bison bison. Pp. 342- 343, in The Smithsonian book of North American mammals (D. E. Wilson and S. Ruff, eds.), Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., xxv +750 pp. Shump, K. A, 1999. Red bat, Lasiurus borealis. Pp. 105- 106, in The Smithsonian book of North American mammals (D. E, Wilson and S. Ruff, eds.), Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C,, xxv + 750 pp. Simpson, G G 1943, Criteria for genera, species, and sub¬ species in zoology and paleontology. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 44:145-178. Stewart, D. T., N. D. Perry, and L. Fumagalli. 2002. The maritime shrew, Sorex maritimensis (Insectivora: Soricidae): a newly recognized Canadian endemic. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 80:94-99. Thacker, R. K., and J. T, Flinders. 1999. Kit or swift fox, Vulpes velox. Pp. 148-150, in The Smithsonian book of North American mammals (D. E. Wilson and S. Ruff, eds.), Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., xxv + 750 pp. Tumlison, R., and M, E. Douglas. 1992, Parsimony analy¬ sis and the phylogeny of the plecotine bats (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Journal of Mam¬ malogy, 73:276-285. van Zyll de Jong, C. G. 1991. Speciation in the Sorex cinereus group. Pp. 65-73, in The biology of the Soricidae (J. S, Findley and T. L. Yates, eds.), Museum of Southwestern Biology, Albuquerque, New Mexico. van Zyll de Jong, C. G. 1999. Cinereus shrew, Sorex cinereus. Pp. 20-21, in The Smithsonian book of North American mammals (D, E. Wilson and S, Ruff, eds.), Smithsonian Institution Press, Wash¬ ington, D.C., xxv + 750 pp. 22 Occasional Papers, Museum of Texas Tech University Wada, S., and K, Numachi. 1991. Allozyme analyses of genetic differentiation among the populations and species of Balaenoptera. Report of the In¬ ternational Whaling Commission, (Special Issue 13): 125-154. Wilson, D. E., and F. R. Cole, 2000. Common names of mammals of the world. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D. C., xiv + 204 pp. Wilson, D. E,, and D. M. Reeder (eds.), 1993. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Smithsonian Institution Press, Wash¬ ington, D.C., xviii + 1206 pp. Wilson, D. E., and S. Ruff (eds.). 1999. The Smithsonian book of North American mammals, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D. C„ xxv + 750 PP- Wilson, P. J., S. Grewal, I. D. Lawford, J. N. M, Heal, A. G Granacki, D. Pennock, J. B. Theberge, M. T. Theberge, D. R. Voigt, W. Waddell, R. E. Cham¬ bers, P, C, Paquet, G. Goulet, D. Cluff, and B. N. White. 2000. DNA profiles of the eastern Cana¬ dian wolf and the red wolf provide evidence for a common evolutionary history independent of the gray wolf. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 78:2156- 2166. Wilson, P. J., S. Grewal, T. McFadden, R. C. Chambers, and B. N. White. 2003. Mitochondrial DNA extracted from North American wolves killed in the 1800s is not of gray wolf origin. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 81:936-940. Wozencraft, W, C. 1993, Order Carnivora. Pp. 279-348, in Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference (D, E. Wilson and D. M. Reeder, eds.), Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., xviii + 1206 pp. Baker et al*— Checklist of North American Mammals, 2003 23 Addresses of authors: Robert J. Baker Department of Biological Sciences Museum of Texas Tech University Texas Tech University Lubbock, TX 79409-3131 e-mail: rjbaker@Mu.edu Lisa C. Bradley Museum of Texas Tech University Texas Tech University Lubbock, TX 79409-3191 e-mail: lisa. bradley@ttu. edu Robert D. Bradley Department of Biological Sciences Museum of Texas Tech University Texas Tech University Lubbock, TX 79409-3131 e-mail: robert , bradley@ttu. edu Jerry W, Dragoo Museum of Southwestern Biology University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM 87131-1091 e-mail: jdragoo@unm. edu Mark D. Engstrom Royal Ontario Museum 100 Queen’s Park Toronto, Ontario M5S2C6 CANADA e-mail; marke@rom.on.ca Robert S. Hoffmann Smithsonian Institution P.0Box 37012 Div. Mamm., Natl Mus. Nat. Hist. MRC108 Washington, D.C. 20013-7012 e-mail: hoffmarm. robert@nmnh.si. edu Cheri A, Jones Department of Zoology Denver Museum of Natural History 2001 Colorado Blvd. Denver ; CO 80205 e-mail: cjones@dmns.org Fiona Reid C.BCB, Royal Ontario Museum 100 Queen r s Park Toronto, Ontario M5S2C6 CANADA e-mail: fionar@globalserve. net Dale W. Rice 14334 Edgewater Lane Seattle WA 98125-3844 e-mail: dale.rice@noaa.gov Clyde Jones Department of Biological Sciences Museum of Texas Tech University Texas Tech University Lubbock, TX 79409-3131 e-ma il: cjmajon es@a ol. co m Publications of the Museum of Texas Tech University The Museum of Texas Tech University has a catalog of Occasional Papers which may be viewed online at www.nsrl .ttu.edu . To do so, you must have Adobe Acrobat® installed on your computer. If you do not have Adobe Acrobat®, please visit http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readermain,html . If you are still experi¬ encing difficulty downloading Occasional Papers, please contact the Webmaster. If there is continued difficulty contact the Webmaster and a single hard copy can be provided to you via mail at no charge. Institutional subscriptions are available through the Museum of Texas Tech University attn: NSRL Publications Secretary, Box 43191, Lubbock, TX 79409-3191. Individuals may also purchase separate num¬ bers of the Occasional Papers directly from the Museum of Texas Tech University. ISSN 0149-175X Museum of Texas Tech University\ Lubbock, TX 79409-3191