Neral es rf as at Pts be 1 bee tage "thee H Ges aae - seNe ete * 4 Lid Abe eis ON SARK ~ 4, Voi? yh, ei fae as wy ae ¥ 51 Sige Eh saeee dora ee | ee A THE ANNALS AND MAGAZINE OF NATURAL HISTORY, ZOOLOGY, BOTANY, ann GEOLOGY. (BEING A CONTINUATION OF THE ‘ANNALS’ COMBINED WITH LOUDON AND CHARLESWORTH’S ‘MAGAZINE OF NATURAL HISTORY. ) CONDUCTED BY CHARLES C. BABINGTON, Esq., M.A., F.B.S., F.L.S., F.G.S., JOHN EDWARD GRAY, Ph.D., F.R.S., F.LS., F.Z.S. &e., WILLIAM S. DALLAS, F.LS., AND WILLIAM FRANCIS, Ph.D., F.1.S. VOL. XV.—FOURTH SERIES. LONDON: PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY TAYLOR AND FRANCIS. 50LD BY LONGMANS, GREEN, READER, AND DYER; SIMPKIN, MARSHALL, AND CO,; KENT AND CO.; WHITTAKER AND CO.: BAILLIERE, PARIS: MACLACHLAN AND STEWART, EDINBURGH : HODGES, FOSTER, AND CO., DUBLIN : AND ASHER, BERLIN, 1875. “ Omnes res creatse sunt divine sapientis et potentiz testes, diviti felicitatis human :—ex harum usu 4onitas Creatoris; ex pulchritudine sapientia Domini ; ex ceconomid in conservatione, proportione, renovatione, potentia majestatis elucet. Earum itaque indagatio ab hominibus sibi relictis semper sstimata ; A veré eruditis et sapientibus semper exculta; malé doctis et barbaris semper inimica fuit.”—Linn2&vs. “Quel que soit le principe de la vie animale, il ne faut qu’ouvrir les yeux pour voir qu'elle est le chef-d’euvre de la Toute-puissance, et le but auquel se rappor- tent toutes ses opérations.”—Bruckner, Théorie du Systéme Animal, Leyden, 1767. . Se acer The sylvan powers Obey our summons; from their deepest dells The Dryads come, and throw their garlands wild And odorous branches at our feet; the Nymphs That press with nimble step the mountain-thyme And purple heath-flower come not empty-handed, But scatter round ten thousand forms minute Of velvet moss or lichen, torn from rock Or rifted oak or cavern deep: the Naiads too Quit their loved native stream, from whose smooth face They crop the lily, and each sedge and rush That drinks the rippling tide: the frozen poles, Where peril waits the bold adventurer’s tread, The burning sands of Borneo and Cayenne, All, all to us unlock their secret stores And pay their cheerful tribute. J. Taytor, Norwich, 1818. CONTENTS OF VOL. XV. [FOURTH SERIES. ] NUMBER. LXXXV. FE I, Observations on Hiickel’s Gastrea Theory. By Dr. W. Somers betes ey 28 8 ae akeett ok Winns arabs II. Notices of British Fungi. By the Rev. M. J. BerKxerey, M.A., F.L.S., and C. E. Broome, Esq., F.L.S. (Plates I. & fi Doe III. Descriptions of two new Species of Crustacea from New Zea- land. By Captain F. W. Herron, C.NOZG. v2 ce em Nel IV. Note on a new Provisional Genus of Carboniferous Polyzoa. By R. Ernermer, Jun., F.G.S. (Plate IV. B. ng 8 Reeeaae V. On the Madagascar River-Hog (Potamocherus), and on the Skulls of the three Species of the Genus, By Dr. J. E. Gray, F.R.S. Meee AP PS Sos tl den Ge VI. On new Speaiee of Bivalve Mollusca found at Cumana, Vene- zuela. By R. J. LecuMErr Guppy, F.LS., F.G.S., &c. (Plate VII. Maa aiashea le he KtginGidededs), oh crutstirs Shei ons e..i. VII. Notice of some Marine Shells found on the Shores of Trinidad. By R. J. Lecuwerr Guppy, F.LS., F.G.S., &e. (Plate VIL Ee eet rt ae ej eniag Mh Ors VIII. Notes on the Paleozoic Bivalyed Entomostraca. No. XI. Some Carboniferous Ostracoda from Russia. By Prof. T. Rupert Jones, F.R.S., F.G.S., &., and JamEs W. Kinky, Esq. (Plate VI.) IX. Notes on Coleoptera, with Descriptions of new Genera and Species.—Part II. By Francis P. Pascox, F.L.S. &e. (Plate VU.) X. On the Genus Bathyporeia. By the Rev. Tuomas R. R. Stepping, M.A. (Plate SS ORES Aa nee XI. Descriptions of five new Species of Fishes obtained in the New-Zealand Seas by H.M.S.~‘ Challenger ’ Expedition, July 1874. By James Hecror, Eg ar wale haa cc 2s vlc dain XII. On a new Motella from Norway. By Roperr Cotuerr ,. age 41 49 iv CONTENTS. Page On the Embryogeny of the Rhizocephala, by Prof. C. Semper; On , the Circulatory Apparatus of the Echinida, by M. E. Perrier ; Embryology of the Ctenophora, by Alexander Agassiz; Notice of Papers on Embryology by A. Kowaleysky, by Alexander Agassiz ; On the Relationship of the V ertebrata and Annelida, by C. Semper; Segmental Organsin adult Selachia, by C.Semper, 83—95 NUMBER LXXXVI. XIII. Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. By M. Ussow.. 97 XIV. On the Genus Rossella (a Hexactinellid Sponge), with the ove ae of three Species. By H. J. Carrer, “RS. &e. (Plate RK)... si ves se cee cols eo 6a we yoo mains om rie em 113 XV. Descriptions of Species of Hippothoa and Alecto from the Lower Silurian Rocks of Ohio, with a Description of Aulopora arachnoidea, Hall. By H. Atteynr NICHOLSON, M.D., D.Sce., F.R.S.E., Professor of Biology in the College of Physical Science, Newcastle-on-Tyne. (Plate XD.) ... es cece cece seen erence eeees 125 XVI. Deseription of a supposed new Genus of Ceylon Batrachians. By W. FEerGuson, LS Ac eet pane 128 XVIL On the Genus Deidamia, y. W.-S. By James Woop- Mason, of Queen’s College, Oxford .....+ 0+. +e sees eee ee reer 11 XVIII. Notes on certain Genera of Agaristide, with Descriptions of new Species. By ARTHUR GARDINER BuTLER, F.LS., F.Z.5., &e. (inte RUD .4 Pe ogo eins nun se ale We +h ple meses 275 pI 135 XIX. Descriptions of new Species of Gobitde in the Collection of the British Museum. By A. W. E. O’SHauGHNEssy, Assistant in the Natural-History Departments.......+.ee sess c reece eee eeees 144 New Books :—Anon. The Excavation in the Kesslerloch near Thay- ingen.—Prof. Albert Heim. On a * Find,” of the Reindeer Period, in Switzerland.—H. Karsten. Studies of the Primeval History of Man in a Cave of the Schaffhausen Jura.—Recherches pour servir 4 l'Histoire Naturelle des Mammiféres, comprenant des Considérations sur la Classification de ces Animaux par M. Hl. Milne-Edwards, des Observations sur 1] Hippopotame de Liberia et des Etudes sur la Faune de la Chine et du Thibet oriental par M. Alphonse Milne-Edwards ..........-++: 148—152 Proceedings of the Royal Society. ..-.++-s++++seecrrrresseeeses 155 On some points in the Anatomy of the Common Mussel (Mytilus edulis), by M. A. Sabatier ; Note on Herpeton tentaculatum ; Notice of some Freshwater and Terrestrial Rhizopods, by Prof. Leidy ; On Leucochloridium paradoxum and the Development of the ie contained in it into Distoma, by Dr. Ernst Zeller; The Diatomew of the Carboniferous Period, by Count F. Cas- tEACHUO, 0 scer ceases eee vine esis 0 | clic Ooo ean 157—164 NUMBER LXXXVU. XX. On Pelagonemertes Rollestoni. By H. N. Mose.ry, Naturalist on board H.M.S. ‘Challenger.’ (Plate SVB) olvia i eR vith’ 165 CONTENTS, Vv Page XXI. Submarine-Cable Fauna. By J. Gwyn Jerrreys, LL.D., F.R.S., and the Rev. A. M. Norman, M.A. (Plate XIL)........ 169 XXII. Descriptions of new Species of Polyzoafrom the Lower and Upper Silurian Rocks of North America. By H. ALteynr Nicuo.- son, M.D., D.Sc., F.R.S.E., Professor of Biology i in the Durham Uni- versity College of Physical Science, Newecastle-on-Tyne. (Plate XIV.) 177 XXIII. Oa some new exotic Sessil-eyed Crustaceans. By the Rev. Tuomas R. R. Sreppine, M.A. (Plate XV. A.).......00 sec ees 184 XXIV. Descriptions of some new North-American Lithobioide. By ANTON STUXBERG XXV. Do Varieties wear out, or tend to wear out ? By Professor Asa GRAY Vie Reiss Sein 6s CC Ce C0185. 0.0 8 6's e pois ¢ p 88 08 2 ee s)he pS Bie ele Se XXVI. Oceanic Sediments, and their Relation to Geological For- mations. By Professor WiLLi1am Kine, Se.D. &e. * XXVII. Remarks on Professor Owen’s Arrangement of the Fossil Rencearnus.- bay GRAB ICR RWET, «ys im assy) paps a.o04.04 9/5 «2.85! 204 XXVIII. Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. By M. Ussow. 209 XXIX. On some new Species of Butterflies from Tropical America. By ArtuuR GARDINER but er, F.L.S., F.Z.5., &e. 222 Proceedings of the Royal Society.............. On the Gammaride of Lake Baikal, by Dr. B. N. Dybowsky ; On the Mode in which Ameba swallows its Food, by Prof. J. Leidy ; On the Discovery of true Batrachians in Paleozoic Roc ks, by M. A. Gaudry ; On the Motive Power of Diatoms, by P ays Wi Leidy; On “the Peripheral Nervous System of the Marine Nematoids, by M. A. Villot a PE ite Ms GONE | ERG 230—235 NUMBER LXXXVIII. XXX. On the Structure and Systematic Position of the Genus Cheirolepis. By R. H. TRAQUAIR, M.D., F.G.S., Keeper of the Natural-History Collections in the Edinburgh Museum of Science are ati pie tats SX. VATS) Foi senne idles. XXXII. On a new Seevice’ of Liphistius (Schiddte). By the Rey. Perera BAe rapes NL ON Peo: clssaswin sabi eieia a gine ajviovgh-a dl oe 249 XXXII. On the Geographical Distribution of Fishes. By THxEo- porE Giux, M.D., Ph.D XXXUI. On an undescribed Organ in Limulus, supposed to be Renal in its Nature. By A. S. Packarb, Jun................00 255 XXXIV. On some Fossil Fishes from the neighbourhood of Edin- burgh. By R. H. Traquarr, M.D., F.G.S. , Keeper of the Natural- History Collections in the Edinburgh Museum of Science and Art. (Plate iW. is ) Neto oP odnia tat nea tolial aie oe, RUei ale ole) at. O'wiwla: dele, wieka Rint a Mm lemmia al bisa te 258 XXXV. Descriptions of new Species of Fish in the Collection of fd tannmemeascnint, Tey A. ELAIY: 65:6,0.5 or-sh0 rhepaid sig tum, sipewitvn,« 268 vi CONTENTS. Page XXXVI. List and Revision of the Species of Anolide in the British-Museum Collection, with Descriptions of new Species. By A. W. E. O'SuauGuyessy, Assistant in the Natural-History SPAR in. 0 > dine Xv 5's 2h + asics xg A ee Ek 270 XXXVII. Biographical Notice of the late Dr. Joun Epwarp MEM Nags ese cn ASS SU ves ch's Sones 2k ane ae ate ae 281 New Books:—Zoology, by Alfred Newton, M.A., F.R.S.—The Student's Guide to Zoology, a Manual of the Principles of Zoo- logical Science, by Andrew Wilson ................00e eee 285 Proceedings of the Royal Society ......-.s.sesesncecveseastvuas 286 On Pinaxia, by Edgar A. Smith, F.Z.S., Zoological Department, British Museum ; On the general Phenomenon of the Embryo- geny of the Nemertians, by M. J. Barrois; On the Reproductive Organs of the Eels, by M. Syrski; Revision of the Nematoids of the Gulf of Marseilles, by M. A. F. Marion ; On a new Order of Eocene Mammals, by Prof. 0. C. Marsh ; On the Mediterranean Species of the Genus Eusyllis, by M. A. F. Marion ...... 300—307 NUMBER LXXXIX. XXXVIII. On the Articular Bone and supposed Vomerine Teeth of Ctenodus obliquus; and on Paleoniscus Hancocki,n. sp., from the Low Main, Newsham, Northumberland. By Tuomas ArrTHeEy. (Plate SER.) ee OE se Oe ie Oe eee nes oe 809 XXXIX. Noteson some Young Stages of Umbellularta, and on its Geographical Distribution. By R. v. WimLeEmMors-SvuuM, Ph.D., Naturalist to the ‘Challenger’ Expedition. (Plate XVIII. A.) .. 312 XL. Ona third new Tertiary Species of Trigonia. By FrEpERIcK M ‘Coy. Professor of Natural Science in the University of Melbourne. (Plate VEEL B.) ccisiccse s,cosse xe ated arn whe ae ee 316 XLI. Zoolegico-Embryological Investigations. By M. Ussow .. 517 XLII. On new Carboniferous Polyzoa. By Professor Jonn Youne, M.D., and Mr. Joun Younc, Hunterian Museum, University of Glasgow. (Plates 1X..& IX: Bis.) 0)... i: 0,09. = x0 ees ee 353 XLII. Note on the Geographical Distribution of the Temno- cephala chilensis of Blanchard. by James Woop Mason, Professor of Comparative Anatomy, Medical College, Calcutta................ 336 XLIV. Descriptions of new Species of Lepidoptera from Central America. By ArTHUR GARDINER BuTLeER, F.L.S., F.Z8., &e. .. 338 XLV. Tylenchus millefolii, n. sp., a new Gall-producing Anguil- inlide. By Dr. Feawei@w's os: 005s c+5 2s be te eee ee 342 XLVI. Experiments on the supposed Auditory Apparatus of the Culex mosquito. By ALFRED M. MAYER ..........00-:eeecerss 349 Proceedings of the Royal Society ....... 00h csereccnceesacsneewn 364 CONTENTS. Ceratodus Forsteri and C. miolepis, by Dr. A. B. Meyer ; On an Ap- paratus of Dissemination of the Gregarineg and the Stylorhynchi, and on a Remarkable Phase of Sporulation in the latter Genus, by M. A. Schneider ; Researches into the History of the Rhizo- pods, by G. C. Wallich, M.D. ; On the Habitat of Peristethidion prionocephalum, Dum., by Dr. A. B. Meyer; Anatomy of a Remarkable Type of the Group of Nemertians (Drepanophorus spectabilis), by M. A. F. Marion; Dimorphie Development and Alternation of Generations in the Cladocera; On the Actinie of the Oceanic Coasts of France, by M. P. Fischer; Action of Page Light on the Development of the Young of Frogs ...... 368—376 NUMBER XC. XLVI. On two Hexactinellid Sponges from the Philippine Islands in the Liverpool Free Museum. By Tuomas Hiaatn, of Huyton. With Remarks by H. J. Carrer, F.R.S. &e. (Plates PCR DESY 6. geo os S vd 2 vice 9 8 yp ara ye sen ems Bora tae were A XLVIII. Descriptions of some new Asiatic Species of Rhynchites. 0 SUS MG GT TeS A DS Se ep ote fe 391 XLIX. Descriptions of new Genera and Species of Lepidoptera in the Collection of the British Museum. By Arrnur GarDINER SA 0S AS a2 a eel Py eh L. Descriptions of some undescribed Species of Birds discovered by Lieutenant Wardlaw Ramsayin Burma. By Arruur, Viscount em Maree EE SE: 25.2 aay Breese SONNY oni ei otgaihe 6 oe ws LI. Descriptions of some new Genera and Species of Coleoptera from South Africa, Madagascar, Mauritius, and the Seychelle Islands. ee anes CO. WATERHOUSE Fo... v6 aaaieh Chaadls wees «pea o> LI. A List of the Gasteropoda collected in Japanese Seas by Commander H. C. St. John, R.N. By Ep@ar A. Suir, F.ZS., Zoological Department, British Museum......... .....0--ee eee LUI. Notes on Carboniferous Lamellibranchiata. By R. Erue- Remmi ys PC Pate As) i. « see LS SN ee event New Book :—Fossil Inland Shells from Dalmatia, Croatia, and Sla- yonia, by Spiridion Brusina, Director of the Zoological Depart- ment of the National Museum of the Triune Kingdom, &c..... On Ctenodus cristatus, by L. C. Miall ; Observations on the Period of the Extinction of the ancient Fauna of the Island of Rodriguez, by M. Alph. Milne-Edwards; On the Development of the Ptero- poda, by NM H. Fol; Notes on an Examination of four Species of Chitons, with Reference to Posterior Orifices, by William H. oe 400 454 Dateewborcalrang Arctic Shells... . 3... 6s. ec cc cers ne 436—443 Prater L 10 B Il. IV. bh Wi. Wit VII. IX, IX. X. XI XII. XIII. XIV. XV. XVI. XVII. XVIII. XIX. XX. XXI. XXII. PLATES IN VOL. XV. New British Fungi. Bathyporeia pilosa. Potamochcerus Edwardsii—Hyphasmopora Buskii. Developmental phases of Mollusks, Insects, and Ascidians. New Carboniferous Ostracoda. West-Indian Mollusca. New Genera and Species of Coleoptera. Rhabdomeson rhombiferum. bis. Thamniscus Rankini. New Species of Rossella. New Species of Alecto and Aulopora. New Hydrozoa. New Agaristide. New Polyzoa. New Exotic Sessile-eyed Crustaceans — Pelagonemertes Rollestoni. New Fossil Fish. Cheirolepis Cummingiz. Young Stages of Umbellularia—New species of Trigonia. Ctenodus obliquus. Carboniferous Lamellibranchiata. - Hyalonema cebuense, Labaria hemispherica. THE ANNALS AND MAGAZINE OF NATURAL HISTORY. [FOURTH SERIES.] po PA AGS per litora spargite muscum, Naiades, et circitm vitreos considite fontes: Pollice virgineo teneros hic carpite flores: Floribus et pictum, dive, replete canistrum. At vos, o Nymphe Craterides, ite sub undas; Ite, recurvato variata corallia trunco a ag e rupibus, et aes eg erte, Dew pelagi, et pingui conchylia succo.” ine ‘ v. Parthenii Giannettasii Ecl. 1. No. 85. JANUARY 1875. I.— Observations on Hiéickei’s Gastrea Theory. By Dr. W. SaLEensky*. [Plate V.] HAcKEL’s investigations on the Calcispongie, which are brought together in his admirable monograph, have led him to a theory to which he ascribes great importance for the con- ception of the phylogenetic relations of the types of animals, ~ and which he calls the Gastrwa theory. This theory was first presented in its chief features in the portion of the monograph treating of developmental history ; but Hiickel has since pub- lished a special memoir upon it and expounded it much more in detail and with relation to the germ-lamella theory T. In its principal features this theory may be summed up very ely. It consists chiefly in the statement that in the ontogenetic development of all the representatives of the vari- * Translated by W.S. Dallas, F.L.S., from the ‘Archiv fir Natur- geschichte,’ 1874, pp. 137-174. + Hackel, ‘ Die Gastrzea-Theorie, die phylogenetische Classification und die Homologie der Keimblitter.’ Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Ser. 4. Vol. xv. 1 2 Dr. W. Salensky on Héckel’s Gastreea Theory. ous ha of animals an embryonal form occurs which pease an elongate-oval shape, consists of two layers (exoderm and entoderm), and encloses a cavity, the stomachal cavity. Hiickel discovered a larva of this construction in the Calcispongiz and called it the “ Gastrula.” “From the identity of the Gastrula in representatives of the most different types of animals, from the Sponges to the Vertebrata,’ Hiickel deduces, “ in accordance with the bio- genetic fundamental law, a common descent of the animal ifs from a single unknown stock-form, constructed essen- tially in the same way as the G'astrula: the Gastrea’’*. In the monograph of the Calcispongizw, however, Hiickel adduces but few facts in evidence of his theory. He indicates only a few animals in which, in his opinion, this form occurs in the cycle of embryonal forms. It would naturally be ex- pected that in the memoir Sp icese published and specially devoted to this theory such facts would be carefully cited ; but this is by no means the case. All that he has done for the factual establishment of the Gastraa theory is that he gives eight partially diagrammatic figures, and, in the case of certain types, mentions some animals in which the Gastrula-stage is supposed to occur (see ‘ Die Kalkschwiimme,’ Band i. p. 467, and ‘ Die Gastrea-Theorie,’ p. 18). The new additions to the facts indicated in the monograph of the Calcispongiz relate to various types of animals. According to the monograph, among the Vermes the G'astrula-stage occurs in Phoronis, Sa- gitta, Euaxes, Ascidia, &c., and according to the ‘ Gastrea- Theorie” in the Platyelmintha (Turbellaria and Trematoda), the Nematelmia (Nematoda, Sagitta), in the Bryozoa and Tunicata, in the Gephyrea and Aeneha (Phoronis, Euaxes, Lumbricus, Chetopoda). Of the Echinodermata, Hiickel, in the “ Gastrea-Theorie,” cites, besides the Asterida, the Holo- thurida. Of the Arthropoda he says, in the monograph, “ Kmbryonal forms which are easily derivable from the Gas- trula occur also among the Arthropoda”’ (Crustacea and Tra- cheata). In the “‘ Gastreea-Theorie ” he gives the figure of a Gastrula deduced from the earliest developmental form of the Nauplius. In the Mollusca, the Gastrula is confined, in the monograph only, to the development of Limnaus ; in the “‘ Gastrea-Theorie ” the Gastrula appears “ to be widely dif- fused in the classes of Bivalves and Univalves.” Among the Vertebrata Hickel cites only Amphioxus in both works, al- though he remarks that “ the continuity which exists between the ontogeny of Amphioxus and the other Vertebrata leaves no * Die Kalkschwimme, Band i. p. 467. Dr. W. Salensky on Hiéickel’s Gastrea Theory. 3 room to doubt that the ancestors of the latter also, at earlier periods of the earth’s history, passed through the Gastrula in the commencement of their ontogenesis.”” Of course this can- not be proved by facts. If the theory be correct it must be in accordance with the facts and explain them. If it is of so much significance in the elucidation of the phylogenetic connexion of animals, we must expect:—1. That the Gastru/a-stage should actually occur very frequently in the ontogenetic development of animals ; or if it is not of such general occurrence (for example, if it is over- leaped in the ontogeny of certain animals) some of the conse- quent phenomena and the analogies in the development of different animals must at once show us that this stage really formerly existed and has merely been overleaped. 2. If the theory is of so much significance for the elucidation of the true interpretation of the ontogenetic import, the development of those animals in which the Gastrula-stage does not occur as such must be deduced and elucidated from this; for the im- portance of the Gastrwa theory is by no means proved only by our detecting the G‘astru/a-stage in some representatives of the different types of animals. What is required of the Gastrea theory must therefore consist (1) in the actual proof of the occurrence of the Gastrula-stage in the ontogeny of different animals, and (2) in the actual proof of its significance in the explanation of the ontogenetic phenomena. If this were the case, all complicated phenomena with which we are acquainted by observation must find a much better explanation in this theory than in previous conceptions. Let us turn first to the facts which, according to Hickel, demonstrate the occurrence of the Gastrula-stage in different animal types. I. Factual demonstration of the Gastrea theory. The Gastreais defined by Hickel in the following words:— “'The Gastrea is a spherical or elliptical body, with a stoma- chal cavity and a mouth-opening, the stomach-wall of which is formed by two different cell-layers, the inner, non-vibratile gastral lamella or entoderm, and the exterior, vibratile dermal lamella or exoderm.”” This definition is so clear and distinct that we may at once recognize the (rastrula-stage if it exists in the ontogeny of an animal. Let us commence our revision of embryological facts with the ontogeny of the Ccelenterata. That in these the Gastrula- stage is remarkably widely diffused and plays a very important part follows & priort from the fact that the Ccelenterata 1* 4 Dr. W. Salensky on Héickel’s Gastrea Theory. (hydroid polyps, sponges), even in their developed state, di- verge very little from the Gastrea form. But even in this animal type the Ctenophora are distinguished from the other Ceelenterata by some very important embryological pheno- mena, since in them, according to the well-known investiga- tions of Kowalevsky*, the gastrovascular system is first pro- duced from the ee. ce in the form of a solid cellular cord or of a cylinder, which only acquires a cavity at a later period, after the meridional rings are indicated. ‘The very important objection which this case offers to the Gastra theory consists in the fact that it cannot be referred to either of the two modes of development of the Gastrula indicated by Hiickel, and that here no Gastrula-stage exists. Vermes.— In the stock of the Vermes the Gastrula (the so-called ‘ infusoriiform embryo ’) occurs sometimes in exactly the same, sometimes in a more or less modified form in the Platyelmintha (Turbellaria and Trematoda), in the Nematelmia (Nematoda, Sagitta), and in the Bryozoa, Gephyrea, and An- nelida (Phoronis, Euaxes, Lumbricus, Cheetopoda).” From the fact that embryos of very different organization are comprised under the so-called ‘ infusoriiform embryos,” we may assert & priort that these embryos are like the Gas- trula in some cases and different from it in others. Such differences often occur between the embryos of one and the same class of Vermes, as, for example, between the various Trematoda. In some of the digeneous Trematoda, the mouth and intestine have been demonstrated in the embryonic state ; in others (and indeed in the majority) they have not. In the subsequent stages of development, as is well-known, the redia are distinguished from the sporocysts by these characters f. The development of the monogeneous 'T'rematoda is so little known that we are not at present in a position to say, from the ascertained facts, whether or not a stage resembling the Gas- trea occurs in these animals. ‘The most complete investiga- tions in this direction, namely those of E. van Beneden f, Zeller §, and Willemoes-Suhm ||, furnish so little information as to the embryonic history of these Trematoda, that we only learn from them the fact that the animals on escaping from the egg already possess all their organs (except the sexual organs). * Mém. de l’Acad. Imp. de St. Pétersb. tom. x. + Leuckart, ‘ Die menschlichen Parasiten,’ Bd. i. p. 491. t ‘Recherches sur la composition et la signification de l’ceuf,” Mémoires couronnés de l’Acad. Roy. de Belg. tom. xxxiy. § Ibidem. || Zeitschrift fiir wiss. Zoologie, Bd. xxii. Dr. W. Salensky on Hackel’s Gastreea Theory. 5 Of the embryonic development of the Turbellaria also we know very little; and what we do know does not prove that these animals pass through a Gastrula-stage. As far as I know, there exist only two investigations which show thoroughly and in detail the embryology and especially the production of the organs, of the Turbellaria. In the memoir of E. van Beneden (Recherches &c.) the process of segmentation is chiefly con- sidered. The two other investigations are due to Keferstein* and 1 t. According to the last author the vitelline mass undergoes segmentation and then separates into a cen- tral and a peripheral layer, of which the latter, by repeated division, furnishes an animal lamella, which becomes converted into the body-wall with the muscular layer and epithelia, and a vegetative lamella, which is developed into the intestinal mem- brane. ‘There is little in this memoir upon the production of the buccal orifice and intestinal cavity. Keferstein’s investi- gations agree pretty nearly with those of Knappert, as he also represents the body-wall and the intestinal wall as produced by the division of a layer, the upper layer. It seems to me, how- ever, that in the Turbellaria we may with great certainty as- sume the Gastrula-stage, because in the sexually immature state they differ very little in their organization from the Gas- trula type. It is otherwise with Nemertina, in which, by the remarkable investigations of Mecznikofft, the earliest developmental pro- cesses have been elucidated. From these interesting researches we learn the important fact that the larva is excluded in the form of a vesicle of one layer and that it leads a free life. According to Mecznikoff a vesicle of one layer is first produced from the egg of the Nemertian; this becomes covered with cilia and then escapes from the egg. This vesicle then under- goes an introversion, which subsequently becomes differentiated into two parts, the anterior intestine and the stomach. Here, therefore, we have a Gastrula-stage. The Nemertina, how- ever, must be separated from the other Turbellaria, as they must be referred to the Ccelomati, and the others to the Accelomi. Whether a Gastrula form exists in the ontogeny of the Ne- matoda is not yet proved. From the researches of Leuckart § * Beitriige zur Anatomie und Entwickelungsgeschichte einiger See- planarien von St. Malo, 1868. + “Embryogénie des Planaires d'eau douce,” Archives Néerlandaises des Sci. &c. This memoir is known to me only by the reports of Keferstein and Leuckart. { Mém. de l’Acad. Imp. de St. Pétersh. tome xiii. § Leuckart, ‘ Die menschlichen Parasiten,’ Bd. ii. Lief. 1, p. 93. E. van Beneden (Recherches, &c. p. 102) regards the interior opaque mass of the embryo as nutritive vitellus; but this appears to me to be by no means proved. 6 Dr. W. Salensky on Léickel’s Gastreea Theory. we may suppose such a stage to occur in Strongylus filaria and Cucullanus. In all Nematoda an embryo consisting of two layers is formed after the conclusion of the process of seg- mentation. From the outer layer is formed the body-wall, from the inner one the intestine. The production of the in- testinal cavity occurs at the time of the formation of the body- cavity. The researches of Kowalevsky on the embryology of Sagitta* establish beyond doubt that in the penticyilocs? of this worm we may admit a Gastrula-stage. The statements of Hiickel that a Gastrula-stage occurs in the Bryozoa do not agree with the known investigations. From the researches of Nitsche+, Claparéde}, and Mecznikoff we know that at any rate in the Bicellarie (Bugula) no stomachal cavity is formed in the larva. As to the embryonic development of the Cyphonautes-like larvee, which, as is well- known, possess an intestinal canal, we have no information. In the postembryonic developmental history of the Bryozoa, which has been better investigated than their embryonic de- velopment, we find no state which has any resemblance to the Gastrula-stage. It is well known that here the intestinal canal (polypide) is developed in a very different manner from other animals. In the class Gephyrea, if Phoronis is to be referred to it, a Gastrula-stage occurs in that worm. Hiickel’s statement that Hwaxes in its ontogeny passes through a Gastrula-stage, is decidedly not correct. The re- markable investigations of Kowalevsky, upon which Hiickel depends, best prove this. rom the embryology of the Oli- gocheta we learn that cases may occur in which, in the same group of animals, one animal passes through a decided Gas- trula-stage in its ontogeny, while another does not. This fact alone sufficiently proves that, in the demonstration of the Gastrea theory, we can by no means be contented with a few representatives of the animal types. The two Oligocheta which Kowalevsky has selected as the subject of his researches, Euaxes and Lumbricus (the ontogeny ot Tubifea is like that of Huaxes) show very essential differences in their first em- bryonic stages. In Huazxes the segmentation takes place in the way which is so characteristic of some Vermes and Mol- lusca. After the first cell-division four large spheres of seg- mentation are formed, upon which a great quantity of smaller * © Embryologische Studien an Wiirmern und Arthropoden,” in Mém. de l’Acad. Imp. 53 St. Pétersh. tome xvi. + Zeitschr. fiir wiss. Zool. Bd. xx. { Ibid. Bd, xxi. Dr. W. Salensky on Héickel’s Gastrea Theory. 7 ones soon make their appearance. ‘The former afterwards form the entoderm, the latter the dermal lamella. Between these two foundations of the germ-lamelle a third layer of cells is immediately produced, and this forms the middle germ- lamella. From this it follows that in Huazes there is no stage which has any resemblance to the Gastrea, and, indeed, that no such stage can occur, because the Gastrula should consist only of two layers. But here, even before the conclusion of the Sa of segmentation, all three germ-lamelle are founded. n Lumbricus, however, which is systematically very nearly allied to Euaxes, a Gastrula-stage occurs. In the ontogeny of the Cheetopoda there seems to be no Gastrula-stage. From the investigations of Claparéde and Mecznikoff* it appears that, after the segmentation of the egg in the Chetopoda, an embryo consisting of two germ-lamellz is formed, and that this soon acquires the bands or tufts of cilia &c. and then quits the egg without possessing any stomachal cavity. ‘Then the eyes are formed in the embryo, the seg- ments of the body become differentiated, and finally the sto- machal cavity with mouth and anus is produced. The latter consequently takes place long after the time when the embryo already possesses its larval organs (Spio fuliginosus, Lumbri- conereis sp., and Dasychone lucullana). I need hardly mention that the Ascidia pass through a Gas- trula-stage in their ontogeny. This is fully proved by the well- known researches of Kowalevsky. According to this examination of the stock Vermes, we can with certainty detect the Gastrula-stage only in Sagitta, Pho- ronis, Lumbricus, the Ascidia, and the Nemertina. In the other Vermes the existence of the Gastrula-stage is by no means proved by embryological researches. We have seen that it does not occur in the ontogeny of most Trematoda, and probably of most Nematoda, Bryozoa, Huaxes, and the Cheetopoda. Perhaps the Leeches might be added to the Vermes which pass through a Gastrula-stage (Leuckart, ‘ Die menschlichen Parasiten,’ Bd. i. p. 689). Before we pass to the other types of animals, we must refer to an important phenomenon which is of much significance in the correct estimation of the factual evidence. The mode of formation of the buccal aperture and of the anterior part of the intestinal canal must be mentioned, as in it phenomena occur which might lead to the assumption of a Gastrula- stage in cases in which really no such stage exists, In the ontogeny of all: animals (except the Sponges and some * “ Beitrige zur Erkenntniss der Entwickelungsgeschichte der Che- topoden,” Zeitschr. fiir wiss. Zool. Bd. xix. pp. 169, 182, and 197. 8 Dr. W. Salensky on Hiéickel’s Gastrwa Theory. Ccelenterata and Vermes) the buccal aperture originates as an invagination of the upper germ-lamella, and, indeed, first of all in the form of a little tube closed posteriorly, which only opens into the subsequently formed intestinal cavity at a very late period (in many, if not in all cases, after the formation of the anus). I mention this only because this buccal invagina- tion may in some cases be confounded with the invagination of the superior germ-lamella of Amphioxus, the Aacliee and other animals, which leads to the formation of the stomachal cavity. The two processes, however, are essentially different. The invagination in Amphiowus and others is a process by which the two germ-lamelle acquire a definite form and position and the intestinal cavity is formed; at the time of that invagination which leads to the formation of the anterior intestine and buccal aperture, on the contrary, the two germ-lamelle have already oe attained to their form and position, and by this latter invagination only the anterior intestine (cesophagus, gizzard, &c.) is formed. Undoubtedly Hiickel has this cir- cumstance in his mind when he says that the buccal apertures of the Vertebrata, Arthropoda, and Echinodermata (to which the Mollusca may be added) are peculiar new formations and certainly not homologous with the primitive mouth. The confusion appears to me, however, to have been made by Ray Lankester * when, in speaking of the developmental history of the Nudibranchiata, he says, “‘ and its occurrence (7. e. the invagination or in-pushing of cells at one pole, just as Kowa- levsky has drawn it in Amphioxus and Phallusta) in a similar stage in certain marine Lamellibranchs is clear from Lovén’s admirable figures, though he has mistaken its significance,” According to the statements of Lovén and the figures given with his researches we see at once that in the Lamellibran- chiata investigated by him the buccal aperture and anterior intestine are formed by invagination ; me therefore these in- vaginations cannot be compared to those which were de- scribed by Kowalevsky. To make the circumstances clear I give figures (Pl. V. figs. 1-3) of three stages in the develop- ment of the oyster which are characteristic in this respect. As regards the Echinoderms we must conclude, from the beautiful investigations of Agassiz +, Mecznikoff {, and Kowa- levsky §, that the Gastrula-stage is very prevalent in the de- velopmental history of these animals. “Tn the stock of the Arthropoda the Gastru/a is indeed no- where any longer preserved in its original pure form ; but itis * Annals & Mag. Nat. Hist., February 1875. + Contrib. to the Nat. Hist. of the United States, vol. v. t Mém. de l’Acad. de St. Pétersh. tome xiii. § Thid. tome xi. Dr. W. Salensky on Hiickel’s Gastreea Theory. 9 very easy to reduce the earliest developmental forms of the Nauplius (as the common stock-form of the Crustacea) and of many other Tracheata to the Gastrula”*. In this connexion Hickel refers to the ontogenetic works of E. van Beneden and Bessels and to the writings of Weissmann. The comparison of the earlier developmental stages of the Nauplius with the larvee of Annelids has been carried out by E. van Beneden in his investigations of the development of Anchorella, Bran- chiella, and Hessia. Unfortunately I have been unable to pro- eure this work, which is known to me only by Nitsche’s re- ports. From the embryological facts known to me with regard to the developmental history of the Arthropoda, and with these also the statements of EK. van Beneden upon the develop- ment of the above-mentioned Crustacea, there is no indication of the existence of the Gastrula-stage in the ontogeny of these animals. The developmental processes of the lower Obie: and, indeed, of the Arthropoda in general, agree with those of the Annelida in this respect, that the first stage after the com- pletion of the process of segmentation in the representatives of these two animal types constitutes a body which consists of two layers but possesses no cavity in its interior. The sub- sequent phenomena are as follows: in the Annelida, as in the Crustacea, the organs of motion appear on the surface of an embryo thus constructed—in the former the rows of cilia, in the latter the limbs ; then the mouth and anus are invaginated, and finally the intestinal cavity is formed. We have noticed the same series of developmental phenomena in the Cheetopoda. Exactly the same series has been demonstrated in the various Arthropoda ; and this may be proved especially by the investi- gations which go in some detail into the history of the forma- tion of the internal organs. With respect to the Nauplius it is proved by the researches of E. van Beneden and Besselst, and especially by the figures to the developmental history of An- chorella uncinata and Clivella hippoglosst, and also by my own researches { upon the development of Spheronella Leuckartt. With regard to the higher Crustacea it may also be regarded as demonstrated by the investigations of E. van Beneden and Bessels (ibid., Gammarus locusta, where a stage is figured pl. ii. fig. 6 at the commencement of the formation of the tail), by A. Dohrn § (Ase//us aquaticus), by Mecznikoff || (Nebalia) , and by Bobretzky j (Astacus fluviatilis, Palamon). * Hiackel, loc. cit. + Mémoires couronnés de l’Acad. Roy. de Belg. tome xxvi. t Archiv fiir Naturg. 1869. § Zeitschr. fur wiss. Zool. Band xvii. || Zapiski Imperatorskoi Akademii Nauk, 1869. {| Zapiski Kievskago Obshchestva Estestvoispitatelei, 1875. 10 ~Dr. W. Salensky on Héickel’s Gastrea Theory. “Tn the stock of the Mollusca the Gastrula seems to be widely prevalent, especially in the classes Conchifera and Gas- teropoda, and probably also in the Spirobranchiata; among the Gasteropoda it was first observed in Limneus’*, In proof of this statement Hiickel appeals to the memoir by Ray Lan- kester (Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist., February 1873, pp. 86, 87). As regards the observations of Ray Lankester on Aplysia, which are described in most detail, we cannot see there a Gas- trula-stage, as, according to the statements of that naturalist, the external organs (mantle &c.) make their appearance very ly, and it is not stated when the stomachal cavity appears. ie as regards the other Mollusca, Doris, Tethys, Pleurobran- chus, Polycera quadrilineata, and Lolis exigua, which are also briefly referred to by Ray Lankester, it must be admitted that these few words, ‘“ I was able to determine in these that the first step in development, after the formation by cleavage of the mass of embryo-cells or ‘ polyblast,’ is the invagina- tion or in-pushing of these cells at one pole, just as Kowa- levsky has drawn it in Amphioxus and Phallusia, and as seen also in the heteropod mollusk Atalanta,” do not prove very much. These statements are supported neither by figures nor by a detailed description of the observed facts. Iam far from doubting the correctness of Ray Lankester’s statements, and indeed cannot do so, because we already know many cases in which in animals systematically nearly related the invagination (and, indeed, the Gastrula-stage) occurs in some and not in others (e. g. Huaxes and Lumbricus). But for me they have too little force as evidence to enable us to rest the existence of the Gastrula-stage in the Mollusca upon them. It is the more necessary to describe such observations in detail, because, with respect to the developmental history of the Mollusca, there exists a mass of statements which are mu- tually very contradictory. With regard to the Lamellibran- chiata the statements of different naturalists are tolerably con- cordant. For the greater part of the observations we are in- debted to the remarkable, although already old, investigations of Lovén, which give the most complete picture of the deve- lopment of several marine bivalves. From these observations and the figures accompanying them we see that the first stage of the development is an embryo which consists of two layers and has no cavity in its interior, that then various external organs and a buccal invagination are formed, and finally an intestinal cavity is produced in the interior of the entoderm. The phenomena are closely in accordance with what we have sievadly had occasion to mention in other animals. They are * Hackel, ‘ Gastrea-Theorie.’ Dr. W. Salensky on Hédckel’s Gastreea Theory. 11 elucidated by the three figures already given (PI. V. figs. 1-3), which represent three characteristic developmental phases of the oyster. But as regards the Cephalophora, the greater part of the ob- servations on this class of the Mollusca agree in showing that, after the segmentation, the egg of these animals becomes con- verted into a body which consists of two different elements— namely, coarsely granular, which lie in the interior of the em- bryo, and paler, which surround the preceding. Such deve- lopmental stages have been demonstrated in the Pteropoda (Liedemannia and Cavolinia) and Heteropoda (Pterotrachea coronata) by the very complete and remarkable observations of Gegenbaur* ; the same conditions are presented, according to J. Miiller +, by Hntoconcha mirabilis ; and Dentalium has a similar development, according to Lacaze-Duthiers f. I have myself described the same Planula-stage occurring first after segmentation in the Prosobranchiata (Calyptraa, Nassa, and Trochus§). Inall the animals mentioned also the subsequent phenomena occur in a nearly concordant manner. First the organs of locomotion are formed, then the foot ; the mouth and cesophagus are invaginated, and finally the intestine is formed. Ampullaria (according to Semper), Ancylus (according to Stephanoff), and Limneus (according to Lereboullet) are deve- loped somewhat differently from these Mollusca. If we com- pare the statements of these last-mentioned naturalists, we arrive at the conviction that the Gastrula-stage occurs only in the ontogeny of Limneus, according to the observations of Lereboullet ||. But these observations are opposed by the very recent beautiful observations of Ganin §] (which unfor- tunately are published without figures). From these last it appears that the invagination of Limnaus does not correspond to those of Amphioxus, the Ascidia, &c., but is rather homolo- gous with the invagination of embryos of Calyptraa, which in Calyptrea separates from each other the rudiments of the vela, foot, and cephalic vesicle. At the bottom of this invagi- nation, in Limneus as in Calyptrea, the cesophageal invagi- nation is formed. In the Cephalopoda there can certainly be no question of a Gastrula-stage. * Untersuchungen uber die Pteropoden und Heteropoden. + Ueber Synapta digitata, und iiber die Erzeugung der Schnecken in Holothurien. {t Memoirs in Ann. des Sci. Nat. 1854-57. § Zeitschr. fiir wiss. Zool. Bd. xxii. || Recherches sur le développement de la truite, du lézard et de la limnée. §{ Warschauer Universitats-Nachrichten ; also Nitsche’s Reports, 1872. 12 Dr. W. Salensky on /dckel’s Gastrea Theory. In the stock of the Vertebrata a Gastrula-stage occurs only in Amphioxus lanceolatus. From this brief summary we may conclude that the diffusion of the Gastrula-stage in the ontogeny of animals is limited to the following—the Ccelenterata (with the exception of the Ctenophora), the Echinodermata, probably some Nemertina, Lumbricus, Sagitta, the Ascidia, perhaps some Mollusca (?), and Amphioxus lanceolatus. Il. The significance of the Gastrula-stage. Having shown, in the preceding section, that the Gastrula- stage is not so generally diffused in the ontogeny of animals as Hiickel asserts, we have already in part furnished evidence that its importance in ontogeny is not so great as Hiickel states. Nevertheless it may be very justly objected to this notion that, although the Gastrula is not of such general oc- currence, it may yet, as a stock-form, play an important part in the elucidation of the phylogenetic relations of animals. The Gastrula-stage might be overleaped in some animals, or obscured by some secondary ontogenetic phenomena. We ought then to recognize this overleaping of the Gastrula- stage from some other embryonal phenomenon. ‘The Nau- plius-stage, which may with perfect justice be regarded as the stock-form of the Crustacea, may be seen in the most different orders of that class; in the most diverse representa- tives of these orders we may, with the greatest certainty, derive from this stage the further changes, the progressions and retrogressions of development. Such are the require- ments that we must lay upon the Gastrula-stage if we are to regard the Gastrea as the stock-form of the Metazoa. We ought therefore to recognize its occurrence in many animals, and be able to read in the development of the animals the history of gradual changes from this stock-form. This, however, we cannot in reality do. We know no single case in which, the Gastrula-stage being wanting, the later em- bryonal phenomena can be elucidated by it; we do not even know of any instance in which the primitive intestine is re- placed by a later one. On the contrary we always see that, in those cases in which the Gastrula-stage occurs, this primitive intestine becomes transformed into the permanent intestine, and the primitive mouth remains in these forms (except in Sagitta) as the permanent mouth. Why are we to charac- terize this intestinal cavity as the primitive intestine, when in no instance can we see a secondary intestine? But in those cases in which we cannot detect any Gastrula-stage (e. g. in the Arthropoda, Mollusca, most Vermes, &c.) we witness the Dr. W. Salensky on Héckel’s Gastrea Theory. 13 production of the intestine at a much later stage, when several germ-lamelle already exist, and the embryo already possesses the characteristic organs of its type, or at least their founda- tions. Why are we in these last cases to assume the Gastrula- stage, when we can discover no traces of any thing of the kind ? This could aid us in the comprehension of the developmental rocesses only if we could derive these instances of the later formation of the intestinal cavity through a series of transitions from the stage which possessed a primitive intestine and had two germ-lamella—that is to say, from the Gastru/a. But we can trace this gradual differentiation only in the animals which = through a true Gastrula-stage (e. g. Amphioxus, the Asci- ia, &c.). In most others we cannot bring the embryonal pro- cesses into connexion with the Gastrula, we cannot regard them as dependent upon the Gastrea (in many Vermes, Mol- lusea, Arthropoda, and most Vertebrata). This shows at once that the Gastrula-stage is proper only to a few animals, and does not occur in the others; and these other animals pass through their embryonal development, their subsequent dif- ferentiation of the intestine, in a somewhat different manner from the former. Can such a form be regarded as the stock- form of all the Metazoa? At least we have no facts in proof of this assertion. On theoretical grounds we cannot expect to find the Gas- trula-stage universally diffused :—in the first place because the intestinal cavity is developed in different animals at different periods of their development; but this intestine is the same as the intestine of those animals which havea Gastrula-stage, and yet it is not bound to a definite stage, 7. e. to definite tem- porary conditions of the embryo (as, for example, the existence of two primary germ-lamelle). Secondly, we cannot expect the Gastrula-stage to be universally diffused, because there are animals which never arrive at the development of an in- testinal cavity. I do not refer to the parasites which have lost their intestinal cavity in consequence of retrogressive me- tamorphosis, although this loss cannot be regarded as ontoge- netically proved in all parasites (e. g. in the Cestodea). I refer to the acelous Turbellaria, which live under the same condi- tions as the Rhabdocela and Dendroccela, which move in the same manner as these and yet possess no intestine. Ulianin has with perfect justice separated them from the others as Accela*. Instead of the intestine these Turbellaria have a * Such as Convoluta, Schizoprora, Nadina, &c. See O. Schmidt, “ Un- tersuchungen iiber Turbellarien von Corfu und Cephalonien” (Zeitschr. fiir wiss. Zool. Bd. xi.) ; Claparéde, ‘ Beobachtungen iiber Anatomie und Entw. wirbelloser Thiere ;’ and especially Ulianin, ‘ Turbellaria of the Black Sea’ (in Russian). 14 Dr. W. Salensky on Hiickel’s Gastrea Theory. sarcode-like body-mass, into which various small organisms find their way as nourishment and are there digested in the same way as in the Infusoria. They have consequently a mouth and the intestinal foundation (Darmanlage), but are des- titute of the stomachal cavity. We have no grounds for ex- plaining the absence of the intestinal cavity in these animals as a consequence of retrogressive metamorphosis *, These two circumstances (namely, 1, the diversity of organi- zation of the embryos of different animals at the time of the formation of the intestinal cavity, and, 2, the accelous condition of some Turbellaria) show quite sufficiently that we are not in a position to derive the embryonal processes from the Gas- trula, nor consequently to accept the Gastrea as the stock- form for the phylogenetic development of the Metazoa. They show that animals may possess the intestinal foundations, without arriving at the formation of the intestinal and stoma- chal cavities. From this it follows in general that we hardly have any reason for assuming the presence of the stomachal cavity in the stock-form of all Metazoa. This applies also to the two primary germ-lamelle, which constitute the second important character of the Grastrula-stage. Is the middle germ-lamella only developed when the two pri- mary germ-lamellz, the exoderm and entoderm, are already at least perfectly formed, even if they do not together consti- tute a Gastrula-form? By no means. We can only say that the middle lamella originates somewhat later than the other two germ-lamelle ; but in the majority of cases it originates long before the stomachal cavity is formed, and it may even originate at a time when the process of segmentation is not quite com- pleted. After this differentiation of the first segmentation- cells, the segmentation may still go on in all these layers of cells. We know of such cases with the greatest certainty, from investigations which have been carried on with perfect accu- racy. One such instance we know in Luazes, from the inves- *It might be objected that retrogressive metamorphosis is by no means always dependent on parasitism, but that there are animals which pass a free existence and yet undergo a retrogressive metamorphosis, e. g. the males of the Rotatoria. But what is usually regarded as the retrogressive metamorphosis of the male Rotatoria is really only an arrest of develop- ment, and consists in the development of these animals remaining sta- tionary at a certain stage, namely at that stage in which they possess no intestinal cavity, but only the foundation for the intestine. In the females a cavity, the intestinal cavity, is formed in this foundation, but not in the males. This mode of development presents essential differences from re- trogressive metamorphosis, as in the latter the animals first show a higher organization and afterwards lose it. (See my “ Beitrage zur Entwickelung des Brachionus urceolaris,” in Zeitschr, fiir wiss, Zool, Bd, xxii.) Dr. W. Salensky on Héckel’s Gastrea Theory. 15 tigations of Kowalevsky*. The scorpion also presents similar conditions, according to the researches of Mecznikofft. If we wish to sum up the various ontogenetic phenomena, draw conclusions as to the developmental processes from ob- servations, and establish these as the basis for our subsequent observations, we must, in the first place, select the most im- ea phenomena common to all animals in the developmental ustory of their organization, and distinguish these from the secondary phenomena, which are manifested later and in a different manner. The developmental processes of all animals consist of a gradual differentiation of the cells first formed, which in many cases commences even at the time of segmen- tation. By the process of segmentation either similar or dis- similar cells are formed. The differences between the seg- mentation-cells may make their appearance in some animals even at the time of the binary division of the egg-cell, in others not until a much later period. This shows that the commence- ment of the differentiation occurs at different periods of de- velopment in different animals. The subsequent phenomena, however, maintain in different animals a similar and definite direction, consisting in the combination (zwsammenlagern) of the heterogenous cells into two or three layers. In these layers the cells are similar. At the conclusion of this first differentiation a definite body-form of the embryo may be pro- duced; from the comparison of these forms in different animals we draw conclusions as to whether this form is or is not com- mon to all animals. If it is common, it is of great importance to our general conceptions. If we can derive from this general form the subsequent phenomena of differentiation in the vari- ous animals, this form has a great phylogenetic value, because this diversity shows us the course of the different divergences from a common fundamental form. If we would be quite consistent in the consideration of ontogenetic phenomena, we must take these most important phenomena alone into con- sideration, without mingling them with other organs of later occurrence. The differentiations of the germ-lamelle are essential for all organisms, because they appear first of all in all animals, and lay a foundation for further organic develop- ment. Ill. General review of the first embryological processes of Animals. In order to place ourselves in a right position with regard to the general embryological processes, we must commence from * Mémoires de l’Acad. de St. Pétersh, tome xvi. + Zeitschr. fiir wiss. Zool. Bd. xxi. 16 Dr. W. Salensky on Héickel’s Gastrea Theory. the first processes of segmentation. on poate this is difficult. The embryology of animals, and especially of in- vertebrate animals, has only for a short time been the subject of zealous investigation. During the last ten years we have become acquainted, with so great a store of facts in this de- partment of science, and these materials are so scattered in various natural-history periodicals, that a satisfactory colloca- tion of all that has been published during this period on the history of development is attended with much difficulty, And even when this difficulty is overcome, we have to do with contradictory statements by different observers ; so that it is nearly impossible to draw general conclusions from the extant materials. Let us commence our examination of the process of segmen- tation and the formation of the germ-lamelle with those forms in which the process of differentiation occurs earliest. Such cases occur among the Rotatoria, in which, after the first binary division of the egg-cell, the differentiation of the two germ- lamelle, the animal and vegetative, is already indicated. In each of these first two segmentation-cells, the further segmen- tation takes place in a very different fashion. The smaller cell continually divides and finally coats the larger cell with its derivatives; and the larger cell also subsequently divides into several cells. We arrive at the terminal form of the differentiation into two germ-lamelle, which form is perfectly similar to the Planula. Instances of the differentiation at a somewhat later stage, after the segmentation has advanced to four uniform segmentation-cells, are much more numerous. They are apparently of very usual occurrence. They are met with in the Mollusca (in the Opisthobranchiata, Prosobran- chiata, Lamellibranchiata, &c.), in the Vermes, Turbellaria (Keferstein, Knappert), in some Annelides (Hwaaes and many Annelides observed by Claparéde and Mecznikoff), in several Crustacea, in which, however, very different modes of seg- mentation may be observed in the different genera and even species (Mecznikoff, ‘Embryol. Studien an Insecten’ and ‘ Entwickelung der Nebalia’ [in Russian], Van Beneden and Bessels, Joc. cit.). This later differentiation has the same re- sult as that of the Rotatoria; the smaller cells grow round the larger ones, which are richer in fat. As the result of the seg- mentation of the egg there is produced a two- or three-layered (as in Zuazes), solid, generally ovoid or spherical body, which may also be characterized as a Planula, although m many cases it differs from the true two-layered Planula of the Coelen- terata by the presence of the three germ-lamelle. This process of differentiation of the germ-lamella may in Dr. W. Salensky on Héickel’s Gastrexa Theory. 17 many instances occur at a much later period, after the com- pletion of the segmentation. In most such cases the segmen- tation-cells are regularly evolved ; there are 2, 4, 8, 16, &c. cells, which further divide with the same regularity; in a word, a regular segmentation takes ose producing a solid sphere consisting of uniform cells. For this stage we may retain the name of ‘ Morula,”’ by which Hiickel indicates the so-called mulberry-stage of segmentation. The Morula may become differentiated in different ways. It may at once form the embryo itself, becoming covered with a cuticular membrane and cilia, and escaping as a larva—as is the case, for example, in the digeneous Trematoda* (Amphistomum subclavatum &c.), according to the observations of EK. van Beneden. The larva of these animals consists of uniform cells and is covered ex- ternally with a ciliated membrane. The larva of the Trematoda can probably become further differentiated and even acquire a stomachal cavity. The Cestoda pass through the Morula-stage in the egg. Before the embryo escapes from the egg, the differentiation of its cells commences in it. This differentiation differs in its results from the differentiation of the germ-lamelle, although the processes are the same in both cases. In consequence of the differentiation there is produced a body consisting of two layers (a central and a peripheral one). But these two layers pass through their further evolution in a somewhat different manner than in the analogous processes of differentiation in other animals. In the Cestoda the peripheral layer becomes converted into a ciliary envelope (or its homologue), and the central layer into a six-hooked embryo. From the researches of E. van Beneden we obtain the data for a comparison of the developmental history of the Tenie with that of the Bothrio- cephali. ‘This naturalist has shown that after the egg of the Cestoda (both Twente and Bothriocephali) has passed through a Morula-stage (mulberry form), it becomes differentiated into two layers, peripheral and central t. (Similar processes had been previously observed in the Bothriocephalide by Kélliker, Mecznikoff, and Knoch.) These two layers are then developed in different ways: from the outer one is formed, in the Bo- thriocephalide, the embryonal envelope (in the Tent it en- * Properly speaking a differentiation has already taken place here, in- asmuch as the peripheral cells have the cilia, which the central ones do not possess. ut this differentiation is essentially distinct from that of the Cestoda and other animals, and it does not lead to the formation of the germ-lamelle. + Recherches &c.,in Mémoires couronnés de l’Acad. Royale de Belgique, tome xxvi. Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Ser. 4. Vol. xv. 2 18 Dr. W. Salensky on Héckel’s Gastrea Theory. tirely disappears) ; the inner one is developed into a so-called Pr a embryo, which consists only of homogeneous cells. We may certainly compare with a Planula that state of the embryos of the Zaniw and Bothriocephalide in which they consist of a two-layered body (therefore before the development of the embryo and the embryonal membrane). In the other animals which pass through the Morula-stage the differentiation of the germ-lamellz takes place in an exactly similar manner asin theabove-mentioned cases (some Copepoda, some Gammaride Brbahly the Ctenophora and the Ccelen- terata, Hydroid polypes, and Sponges). After the segmentation the uniform cells divide into two layers, which represent two germ-lamelle, and become further developed into the organs. Unfortunately, in the investigations of the development of many of these animals, the question of the formation of the germ-lamelle has been very little referred to. It appears to me that in many instances the entoderm has been explained as the nutritive vitellus. But until the formation of the intes- tinal epithelium in the lower Crustacea has been further in- vestigated, we may affirm with perfect justice, from the analogy of the developmental processes in animals which have been better investigated, that the central spherules, abounding in fat, of the crustacean embryos really pest the entoderm and not the nutritive vitellus. ‘That in many instances we can see no cells in this part is due to its opacity. In Astacus fluvia- til’s the peripheral parts of the cells of the entoderm, from which the intestinal epithelium is formed, are also very diffi- cult to observe, and only become distinct when they are tinged with carmine or some other colouring-material. At any rate in this instance also we obtain, as the result-of differentiation, the same temporary body-form, consisting of two layers, and possessing no cavity in its interior—that is to say, the Planula. In some instances, in which we decidedly have the same process before us, it may be obscured by certain subsidiary phenomena. In most cases this masking is caused by the occurrence of the nutritive vitellus, which is accumulated in the egg in larger or smaller quantities. Such cases occur, for ex- ample, in the oath in Reptiles and Birds, and also in Fishes. Here the egg-cell which becomes segmented is situated at one pole of the egg. The segmentation may be campared to the regular segmentation, inasmuch as the cells produced by the segmentation are at first uniform and subse- quently differ from one another. It is only at a later period that the differentiation of the germ-lamelle occurs in this aggregation of cells ; the germ-lamelle are mutually arranged Dr. W. Salensky on Hiickel’s Gastrea Theory. 19 in a manner differing from the true Planula-form, but yet re- main perfectly homologous with the germ-lamelle of the Plaitelis These processes also appear to take place in the same way in thie scorpion. Cases may, however, occur in which, after segmentation, a Planula-form is not at once produced. Most of these cases have been recently made known by the researches of Kowa- levsky and Mecznikoff in the Ascidia, Amphioxus, Nemertina, &c. In these animals the egg passes through a so-called re- gular segmentation, and at the close of this becomes converted into a vesicle surrounded by uniform cells, which, to distinguish it from the Planula, may be named the ‘ Blastula.” The di- stinctions between the Planula and the Blastula are that the former already possesses two germ-lamelle, while the latter has still to form them. As the Planula-form in the Celen- terata issues from the egg and passes into free life, so also can the Blastula become free and swim about in the water, as is the case, for example, in the Nemertina (Mecznikoff, ‘ Mémoires de l’Acad. Imp. de St. Pétersb.’ tome xiil.). In such a larval or developmental stage we can say nothing of either exoderm or entoderm. The two lamelle are still quite undifferentiated; this differentiation occurs somewhat later, and leads to a form which differs somewhat from the Planula-form. In some cases, before the differentiation into two germ-lamelle, this Blastula-form may form a thickening at one point of its surface, to which the subsequent differentiation is confined, as seems to be the case, for example, in the Mammalia. Usually the dif- ferentiation commences in the Blastula by a portion of its cells beginning to distinguish themselves from the rest by some character. Let us commence our examination with the processes which indicate the differentiation in the Blastula of the Ascidia, as these have been best investigated. The first alteration in the Blastula consists in its becoming flattened on one side*. From Kowalevsky’s figures we see that at this stage (see Kowalevsky loc. cit. fig. 5 and Pl. V. fig. 4) the two germ-lamelle are already differentiated. The differentiation occurs in the same way in Lumbricus, where also the same flattening of the Blas- tula is the first thing that makes its appearance. I must spe- cially cite this first form of the differentiation of the germ- lamelle, because in most cases in the above-mentioned animals the differentiation of the germ-lamelle has been confounded with the subsequent invagination; the latter, however, is a * Kowalevsky, “ Weitere Studien iiber die Entwickelung der einfachen Ascidien,” in Archiv fiir mikr. Anat. Bd. vii. p. 105. Q% 20 Dr. W. Salensky on Héickel’s Gastrea Theory. secondary phenomenon, as we shall see hereafter. The stage in which the first differentiation of the germ-lamelle occurs is of great importance, because it may serve for comparison with the gyn) stages in other animals which also pass through a Blastu/a-stage in their ontogeny. By the occurrence of the differentiation the Blastula will become equivalent to the Planula. To distinguish this stage from the true Blastula, which consists only of uniform cells, it may be called the “ Diblastula”’ (See Pl. V. fig. 4). The same process of differentiation seems also to be very common among Insects; but it is in these somewhat masked by the presence of a nutritive vitellus. But if we stick to the principal characters of the case now expounded (namely, 1, the occurrence of a one-layered vesicle, and 2, the mode of differ- entiation of the germ-lamelle), the first processes of insect- development might also be St make in an analogous fashion. These first processes are well known since the works of Zad- dach, Weissmann, and Mecznikoff. The differentiation of the erm-lamelle in Insects has been carefully investigated by Kowalevaky. Kowalevsky, in his investigations, Seca has arrived at the conviction that the inferior germ-lamella of Insects constitutes a peculiar formation, and cannot be com- pared with that of the Vertebrata. He compares the subse- quently formed dorsal tube of Hydrophilus and the Phryganeide with the intestino-glandular lamella of the Vertebrata. I can by no means share this Sl paapesy To me the phenomena of the formation of the germ-lamelle in the Ascidia appear to be so in accordance with those of Hydrophilus, that ie certainly can find no obstacle to regarding the inferior germ-lamella of Hydrophilus as homologous with that of the Ascidia (and therefore also of Amphioxus). We have seen that in the As- cidia the differentiation of the inferior germ-lamella is effected by some cells of the Blastula (the cells of the entoderm) be- ginning to distinguish themselves from the others (the cells of the exoderm). According to Kowalevsky’s researches this differentiation in Hydrophilus commences in a perfectly similar way. In order to make it easier to see our way with regard to the homology of these two formations, I have given two figures from Kowalevsky’s memoirs (Pl. V. figs. 4 and 5). In the Ascidia a vesicle consisting of uniform cells is first of all produced from the segmentation-cells; in the Insects also the same vesicle occurs, differing from the former only by its being filled with vitellus. In the Ascidia the differen- tiation of the germ-lamelle is brought about by some cells of this vesicle beginning to distinguish themselves from the others, and thus forming the Gradatian of the inferior germ- Dr. W. Salensky on Héckel’s Gastrea Theory. 21 lamella; in Hydrophilus exactly the same process occurs in the formation of the germ-lamelle. In the Ascidia the intestino-glandular lamella and the middle germ-lamella are formed from the inferior germ-lamella ; in Hydrophilus the same differentiation takes place in the inferior germ- lamella. The two forms in which the process of differentiation in the germ-lamelle commences, (namely 1, the planula, in which the two germ-lamelle are already differentiated, and 2, the blastula, in which an indifferent cellular layer, afterwards becoming differentiated, is formed) appear to pass into each other. It is to be hoped that such transitions will hereafter be made known in greater numbers; the development of the Campanularie trom the ova of Eucope polystyla* may at present serve as an example. The ova of this Medusa pass through a regular process of segmentation, which leads to the evolution of a Blastula-stage. This latter form subsequently passes into the Planula in this way: in the interior of the blastula the cells of the inferior germ-lamella (entoderm) are formed; and these accumulate more and more, until finally they entirely fill the cavity of the Blastula. By this mode of deve- lopment there is produced from the Blastula a form which consists of two germ-lamelle and possesses no cavity in its interior, ¢. e. a Planula-form. Palemon also presents a similar transition into the Planula-form in its development; but in it an invagination is formed before the transformation takes place. The stage with the invagination may have a great resemblance to the Grastrula-stage ; but it is essentially dis- tinguished therefrom by the circumstance that the invaginated part in Palemon does not form the entoderm, as is the case in other true Gastrula-forms, but always remains exoderm. The transitions just indicated may, to a certain extent, explain the mutual relations of the Planula and the Blastula. The Planula-form occurs most frequently in the ontogeny of animals; and for this reason it may be regarded as the funda- mental form. The cases in which the Blastula passes into the Planula appear still further to support this assertion. The other cases in which (as, for example, in Amphioxus, the Ascidia, &c.) a Gastrula originates from the Slastula, are united even by the Blastula-stage with the case of Hucope, and differ from the latter case by the circumstance that they lead very soon to the development of the intestine; here, therefore, the Planula-form (which, as is well known, pos- * Kowalevsky, ‘ Beobachtungen iiber die Entwickelungsgeschichte der Ceelenteraten’ (Russian). 22 Dr. W. Salensky on Heéickel’s Gastreea Theory. sesses no intestine) is overleaped. The production of the Gastrula from the Blastula-form may be regarded as an abridgment of development. Nt Hitherto we have considered the processes of differentiation of the germ-lamellw, and seen that these me be referred to two forms—the Planula and Diblastula. rom this point further processes occur in different manners in different animals, the consideration of which may assist us in obtaining a notion of the import of the Gastrula-stage in the ontogeny of animals. Let us commence our examination with the animals which in their development pass through a Planula-stage in the pure form—that is to say, in the early period of their development present a body which consists of two or three germ-lamelle and has no cavity in its interior. It is in this form that the embryos of the Coelenterata quit their gj Bertier de and in this stage they have long been known under the above name. The ei ment of the Gastrula from the Planula has been most sonar investigated by Hiickel in the Sponges, and described in detail in this Monograph. The phenomena of this process are as follows :—First of all a cavity is formed in the entoderm of the Planula; this stage Hickel indicates by the name of ‘‘ Planogastrula.’ The mouth then breaks into this cavity from without, by which the conversion of the Planogastrula into the Gastrula is effected. In the hydroid polypes this conversion has long been known. By the con- version of the Planula into the Gastrula the chief processes of the formation of the body of the Ccelenterate are already completed. The body in these animals (Hydroid Polypes, Sponges, &c.) consists during their whole life of these two layers which cireumscribe the cavity ; only the organs which distinguish the different groups of the Coelenterata from each other (tentacles, pores, skeletal parts, &c.) are afterwards formed. It is probable that in the Turbellaria also similar simple processes occur in the formation of the stomachal cavity ; but as very little is known about their development, we cannot affirm this. According to Keferstein’s statements, the stomachal wall of these animals is produced by the differentia- tion of the superior layer of cells (exoderm), Unfortunately we do not know the developmental history of the accelous Turbellaria (Convoluta, Schizoprora, &e.). In their organiza- tion these are distinguished from the Planula only by the presence of the mouth. From this it may be supposed that the conversion of these animals from the Planula consists only in the perforation of the buccal orifice. Dr. W. Salensky on Héchel’s Gastrewa Theory. 23 In all other animals which pass through the Planula-form in their development, the developmental phenomena occur nearly in the following order :—After the Planula-stage the foundations of various external and internal organs, which appear in these animals as typical, persistent, or larval organs, are formed, ¢. g. the limbs, the shell, the velum, &c.; then the anterior intestine and the anus are invaginated; and finally the intestinal cavity is developed in the interior of the vege- tative lamella. This sequence I have endeavoured to represent by the already cited three stages in the development of the oyster (Pl. V. figs. 1-3). With regard to the invagination of the anterior intestine, I have already noted that it is a secondary phenomenon which cannot be compared to the so-called inva- gination of the exterior lamella of the Ascidia, Amphiocus, &c. —that is to say, to the Gastrula-stage of these animals. The middle intestine, which corresponds to the stomachal cavity of the Gastrula (of the Coelenterata), is only ae as in our eases when the typical organs are already formed and the middle lamella is differentiated. We may conclude as to the existence of the latter from statements derived from very thorough investigations (Euaxres, Tubifer, &e.). In these cases, therefore, no Gastrula-stage is formed. If we take the Vermes first into consideration, we have an example in Euazes, which has already been repeatedly mentioned. As the formation of the intestinal cavity in this animal has already been spoken of, I will only men- tion here that the invaginations for the mouth and anus (anterior and posterior intestine) are produced rather early. The Chzto have also been referred to above. We have seen that in them also the ciliary bands and tufts are first formed, then probably the mouth is invaginated, and finally a stomachal cavity is produced in the interior. (See Claparéde and Mecznikow /oc. cit.) With regard to the Mollusca, the statements of Lovén, Lacaze-Duthiers, Gegenbaur, and myself have already been mentioned. Although we have seen that the statements of different observers with respect to this type of animals differ somewhat from each other, and that the intestine originates from the exoderm according to some, and from the entoderm ing to others, it is nevertheless probable that in most animals of this type the sequence of the developmental pheno- mena is accordant. If the development takes place in the same way as in the oyster, the shell, velum, and buceal inva- gination first appear, and it is only afterwards that the intes- tinal cavity makes its appearance. The development of the Pteropoda, Heteropoda, and Prosobranchiata (Calyptrea, 24. ~—-‘Dr. W. Salensky on Haickel’s Gastrea Theory. Trochus, Vermetus, Entoconcha, &e.) takes place in the same manner. The further developmental phenomena of the animals which pass through the Blastula-stage in the course of their ontogeny, may occur in different ways. If we commence with the embryonal state of the Ascidia, which constitutes a flattened siesinke (Pl. V. fig. 4), and in which the differentiation into two germ-lamelle has already been effected, we see that the subsequent phenomena consist in the whole embryo acquiring a aug form (fig. 5). ‘This cup, consisting of two layers, afterwards passes into the Gastrula-stage (as 1s well known in the Ascidia, Amphiowus, Lumbricus, &c.). In consequence of these changes (of the invagination) the stomachal cavity of the Gastrula is produced ; but the stomach-wall has been differentiated earlier, during the flattening. Whilst in the last-mentioned cases the embryo (D¢blastula) is converted into the Gastrula-form, the corresponding Diblas- tula-form of the insect undergoes quite different changes. In these the entoderm sinks into the nutritive vitellus, and is gradually covered from without by the exoderm. The diver- gence of the two corresponding stages of development in the Ascidia and in Hydrophilus, both of which may be derived from a common Diblastula-form, is elucidated by the two figures 6 and 7, in Plate V.* These differences in development lead finally to the totally divergent conditions of the subsequent embryonal phenomena in these two animals. Whilst in the Gastrula (Ascidia) the intestinal cavity is already sketched out, it will only be formed afterwards in the insect, and, indeed, in quite another manner than in the Gastrula. From this it is clear that the formation of the stomachal cavity in these two cases is a secondary phenomenon, governed by different later conditions of the exodermal and entodermal layers. The most important phenomenon in both cases is the differentiation of the germ-lamelle from an indifferent cell-layer, therefore that stage of development represented in figs. 4 and 5. They are of great importance, chiefly because they represent the first processes which are common to the two forms (Ascidia and Insecta), and from which the divergence of the subsequent developmental forms starts. * The developmental states which occur in Hydrophilus at the period of the closing ot the groove (see Kowalevsky, loc. cit. Taf. ix. figs. 21-25) may serve as an inducement for assuming the occurrence of the Gastrula- stage in this animal. But to me this assumption seems to be scarcely justified, because the same process takes place without any such formal condition in Gastropacha pin, (See owalevicy, Taf. xii. figs, 1-6.) Dr. W. Salensky on Héickel’s Gastrea Theory. 25 If we regard the differentiation of the germ-lamellz as the chief phenomenon, and the formation of the intestinal cavity as a secondary one, it is clear that the Gastrula-form with the stomachal cavity, in these cases also, as in development from the Blastula, cannot be regarded as the fundamental form. From this brief revision of the first embryonal phenomena in animals it follows that the Gastrula-stage may originate from the Planula or Blastula in consequence of secondary, subsequently occurring alterations of the latter; in most instances it is not produced. After these observations I need hardly ask whether a form proper to only a few animals can represent the stock-form of all Metazoa, it being understood that in other animals we see the development take place quite independently of this form? The reason of the incorrect- ness of the Gastrwa theory consists in the fact that in the stock-form of the Gastrwa a secondary embryonal phenomenon (the formation of the stomachal cavity) is placed in juxtaposi- tion with the primary and most important of these phenomena (the formation of the germ-lamellz). The incorrectness lies in the assumption that the Gastrula is that early state of deve- lopment “ in which the embryonal animal body represents the simplest conceivable form of the person” (‘ Ccdeonsiticanert p- 17). Why are we to accept as the simplest being an animal which is already provided with a stomachal cavity, when we are acquainted with Metazoa (the accelous Turbel- laria) which possess no stomachal cavity? Such accelous Metazoa are represented by the Gastrula before it acquires the stomachal cavity and while it swims about as a Planula-form (in the Coelenterata). Hiackel has placed this Planula among the animals which have no germ-lamelle, among the Protozoa. (See the synoptical table in the ‘Gastreatheorie’). Such a combination is quite unintelligible to me; for Hickel himself says, in his Monograph of the Calcispongiz, that the differen- tiation of the germ-lamellz occurs even in this stage. It proves the artificiality of the idea of the “ Gastrula,” that it should stand as a “dividing boundary” between the Pro- tozoa and Metazoa. When the Planu/a of the Celenterata acquires a stomachal cavity anda mouth, it becomes converted into a Cceelenterate (Metazoon); why should it as a Planula represent a Protozoon, if it possesses the two germ-lamelle which the Protozoa have not, and which are only produced by the process of segmentation, which the eggs or germs of the Infusoria do not pass through ? In the short revision of the first embryonal processes in animals we have seen that in most instances the two germ- 26 Dr. W. Salensky on Hiéickel’s Gastrexa Theory. lamelle constitute a form which resembles the Planula-form of the Coelenterata and differs from this form only in certain animals by the further differentiation of the middle germ- lamella. ‘The other form, from which the differentiation first commences, and which consequently is not to be compared to the Planula, I have called “ Blastula,” merely in order to indicate by this name that developmental state of some animals starting from which differentiation of the germ- lamella occurs somewhat otherwise than in the Planula. We have met with this form in various animals, and_ briefly explained their further process of differentiation. The sim- plest differentiation consists in that some cells of the Blastula begin to distinguish themselves from the rest. By this, two germ-lamellz are at once indicated, and the grade of organi- zation equivalent to that of the Planula is attained. ‘The two germ-lamelle may be further developed in different ways : either they may constitute a body, which is the Gastrula (as in Amphioxus, the Ascidia, &e.) ; or the inner germ-lamella may be covered by the outer one, by which no Gastrula-form is pro- duced (as in the Insecta). In these brief remarks on the Gastrwa theory I have only desired to bring together the facts with which | endeavoured to clear up the significance of that theory for myself. The negative result at which I arrived rests upon facts, especially on these—that the Gastrula is not of general occurrence, and that the embryological phenomena cannot be brought into causal connexion with this fundamental form. Hven if the Gastrula were of as general occurrence as Hiickel states, this would by no means prove that it is truly an ontogenetic fundamental form; for what do we gain by the assumption that the Gastrula is a fundamental form of the development of all Metazoa, if we cannot by this form explain the differences in the development of nearly allied animals (e. g. Amphioxus and other Vertebrata, Ctenobranchiata and the other Proso- branchiata, &c.)? By the Gastrwa theory we cannot explain tle difference in the development of Lumbricus and Euazes. But very many such examples exist; and they show that, between animals standing near each other systematically, essential differences may occur in the foundation of their organs. ‘This fact, however, appears so paradoxical only because we are now accustomed to deduce the relationship of animals only from anatomical facts, and to conclude from similarity of organization that there is similarity of develop- mental processes. But in order to ascertain the mutual rela- tions of organized forms, we should employ all the methods of natural history;° we must regard the structure of the mature organic forms as the result of the ontogenetic pro- Dr. W. Salensky on Hackel’s Gastrea Theory. 27 cesses, and not judge of the ontogenetic facts merely from the opinion derived from the anatomical facts. If we desire to take an objective view, we cannot say that when two different modes of development ‘‘oceur in very nearly allied forms ” they are of no consequence to us on account of their relation- ship*. If the phylogenetic fundamental law is correct, the relationship of animals must only be ascertained from ontogeny ; otherwise the idea of relationship, which is derived only from tectological facts, is a preconceived opinion. In now concluding my remarks, [ hope in these few words to have furnished the factual evidence :— 1. That the most important factor in the ontogeny of animals is the first differentiation of the germ-lamelle. 2. That this differentiation commences in different animals at different periods of their development, and in most cases leads to the Planula-form, which occurs in all animals, either in the pure form (in most animals) or in a modified form (Vertebrata and some invertebrate animals), and even exists as free-living animal forms. In many instances the Planula-form may be overleaped and replaced by the Di- blastula. 3. That the development of the stomachal cavity is a later, secondary developmental phenomenon, which occurs in diffe- rent animals in different stages of development, and cannot take a place in the idea of the fundamental form of develop- ment. 4, That therefore the Gastrula-form cannot be accepted as a fundamental form in the developmental history of all Metazoa; and, consequently, 5. That the problematical form “ Gastrw@a’’ cannot be accepted as the “ stock-form ”’ for the higher animal stocks. EXPLANATION OF PLATE V. Figs. 1, 2,3. Three developmental stages of the oyster (original); Er. exoderm; En. entoderm; V. velum; S. shell; M. invagina- tion of the anterior intestine; D. intestine. Fig. 4. Diblastula of an Ascidian (from Kowalevsky : ‘‘ Weitere Studien,” &e., in Arch. fiir milky. Anat. Bd. vii. Taf. x. fig. 5): Ex. exo- derm; En. entoderm. Fig. 5. Diblastula of Hydrophilus (from Kowalevsky : “ Embryol. Studien,” &e., in Mém. de l’Acad. de St. Pétersb. tome xvi. Taf. ix. fig. 20): Ex. exoderm; Zn. entoderm ; Nd. nutritive vitellus. Fig. 6. Gastrula of an Ascidian (from Kowaleysky, /. c. Taf. x. fig. 6): Ex. exoderm; En. Entoderm. Fig. 7. Transverse section through the embryo of Hydrophilus (from Kowalevsky, J. c. Taf. ix. fig. 26): Ev. exoderm; £n. entoderm. * Hackel, Die Kalkschwamme, Bd. i. p. 467. 28 Rev. M.J.Berkeley & Mr.C. E. Broome on British Fungi. 11.— Notices of British Fungi. By the Rev. M. J. BERKELEY, M.A., F.L.S., and C. E. Broome, Esq., F.L.S. [Continued from vol. xi. p. 349.) [Plates I. & IT.) 1402. Agaricus (Lepiota) cinnabarinus, Fr. Ep. ed. 2, . 36. - This very fine species was sent from New Pitsligo, Aberdeen- shire, by the Rev. J. Fergusson. 1403. A. (Armillaria) subcavus, Schum.; Fr. Ep. ed. 2, ». 46. Cirencester, Noy. 1873, Miss Broadwood. An entirely white variety. *4. (Tricholoma) lascivus, Fr. Ic. tab. 38. fig. 1. Forres, Rev. J. Keith. A specimen, certainly belonging to this species, was brought to Hereford by Mr. Renny, with decidedly decurrent gills. 1404. A. (Tricholoma) paneolus, Fr. Ic. tab. 36. fig. 2. Street, Somersetshire, J. A. Clark, Esq. Stem longer than usual. 1405. A. (‘Tricholoma) pedidus, Fr. Ic. tab. 46. fig. 1. Abergavenny, J. Renny ; Wollaston, Norths., Miss Hume. 1406. A. (Clitocybe) diatretus, Fr. Ep. ed. 2, p. 104. Coed Coch. Gathered at the same time with A. fragrans, from which it was at once distinguished by the total absence of the peculiar odour of that species. 1407. A. (Clitocybe) angustissimus, Ir. Ic. tab. 59. fig. 2. In woods. Ascot, 1873. 1408. A. (Collybia) museigenus, Schum. Coed Coch, 1873. 1409. A. (Collybia) ambustus, Fr. Ic. tab. 70. fig. 2. On burnt earth. Kew; Coed Coch. 1410. A. (Mycena) galericulatus v. calopus, Fr. Ic. tab. 80. fig. 2. On blocks of wood in a fernery. Coed Coch, 1872. Ex- tremely beautiful. . 1411. A. (Mycena) etites, Fr. Ic. tab. 81. fig. 5. Ascot, 1873. 1412. A. (Omphalia) philonotis, Lasch.; Fr. Ic. tab. 76. fig. 1. On Sphagnum. Glamis, Rey. J. Stevenson. 1413, A. (Omphalia) wmbelliferus, L., var. abiegnus. In considerable numbers on a very decayed fir-stump. Pale yellow.. Coed Coch, 1873. Rey. M.J. Berkeley & Mr.C. E. Broome on British Fungi. 29 * A, (Pleurotus) septicus, Fy. In great numbers on a turf of Salix polaris from Spitz- bergen in a greenhouse in the Botanic Garden at Cambridge. *A. (Pluteus) parvulus, Weinm. A very minute form occurs on the soil of garden-pots in stoves, with a transparent, minutely tomentose stem; volva white, silky. #4. (Entoloma) placenta, Batsch. Glamis, Rev. J. Stevenson, April 20, 1874. Exactly the plant of Batsch. 1414, A. (Entoloma) resutus, Fr. Pastures. Glamis, Rev. J. Stevenson, no. 380. 1415. A. (Nolanea) écterinus, Fr. Edensor, J. Renny, Esq. Exactly according with a figure from Fries. 1416. A. (Nolanea) celestinus, Fr. M. Terry, Esq., Oct. 1872. 1417. A. (Hebeloma) Bongardii, Weinm. F 1. Russ. p. 190. Growing in large quantities on the Culbin sand hills, near the Findhorn mouth, G. Norman. *A.(Flammula) scambus, Fr. On an old stump. Moccas, Herefordshire, 1873. *A. (Flammula) cnopus, Fr. On decayed stamps of fir or larch, Hereford, J. Renny. Ascot, 1873. The specimens agree exactly with Bolton’s figure, which was previously the only authority for the species being British. 1418. A. (Hypholoma) storea, Fr. This curious species occurred last year at the base of different trees at Ascot and at Coed Coch; and it has also been found by Mr. W. G. Smith, and was exhibited at South Kensington, October 1873. It is considered very rare by Fries; but it is probably one of those species which are abundant in some one year, and are not found again for a generation. 1419. A. (Hypholoma) e/wodes, Fr. Slough, M. Terry, Esq., 1873. 1420. Hygrophorus fornicatus, Fr. Holme Lacy, Moccas Park, Herefordsh.; Batheaston, 1873. 1421. Cantharellus albidus, Fr. Fl. Dan. tab. 1293. Coed Coch, Sept. 1872, and in the same spot, Oct. 1873. Exactly agreeing with the figure in ‘ Flora Danica.’ 1422. C. Stevensoni, B. & Br. Pileo orbiculari umbilicato, pallido glabro; margine inflexo ; stipite cylindrico, subtiliter ulverulento albo dein obscuriore ; lamellis decurrentibus pal- lidis antice fuscatis. 30 Rev. M.J. Berkeley & Mr.C. E. Broome on British Fungt. On very rotten wood amongst moss. Glamis, Rev. J. Stevenson, March and April 1874. Pileus about 2 lines across ; stem } inch high, } line thick, with a little white mycelium at the base. Very near to C. cupulatus ; but that is very strongly umbonate when young, and the umbo is always visible at the bottom of the umbilicus ; the habitat, moreover, is different. 1423. Lentinus scoticus, B. & Br.; Fr. Ep. ed. 2, p. 485. Inodorus ; pileo glabro hygrophano multiformi, reniformi ex- panso ; stipite omnino obsoleto, brevi vel longo deorsum fusco- vestito, pleruamque umbilicato; margine lobato sinuato; lamellis dentatis decurrentibus ; mycelio repente fusco. On decayed Ulex and rotten wood. Glamis, Rev. J. Steven- son; Menmuir, Rev. M. Anderson. Inodorous or, at any rate, without any odour of aniseed ; extremely variable; pileus $-14 inch broad, smooth, hygro- phanous, pallid, at length brownish, either quite stemless and reniform, or variously stipitate, solitary or cespitose, some- times deeply umbilicate, lobed at the margin, and sinuate or plicate ; stem, when present, varying from 2 lines to as many inches ; gills rather distant, strongly toothed, decurrent when the stem is developed. Very rarely two pilei are joined. The nearest ally to this curious species is Lentinus omphalodes. 1424. Boletus sulfureus, Fr. This fine species was found in great abundance on sawdust at Forres by the Rev. J. Keith. 1425. B. ereus, Bull. Surrey, M. Terry, Esq. Spores oblong, oblique at the base, -0004—-0005 inch long, ‘0002 wide. 1426. B. carnosus, Rostk. Stoke Pogis, M. Terry, Esq. * Polyporus lentus, B. On Ulex. Glamis, Rey. J. Stevenson, no. 58. 1427. P. floccopus, Rostk. St. Deutschl. Fl. no. 28, tab. 13. On dead wood. Glamis, Rev. J. Stevenson. 1428. P. trabeus, Fr. Glamis, Rev. J. Stevenson; Menmuir, Rev. M. Anderson. 1429. P. borealis, Fr. Slough, M. Terry, Esq. 1430. P. (Anodermei) Ketthi?, B. & Br. Conchatus ; pileo rubro-fusco, processibus dentiformibus hispido; hymenio pallido ; dissepimentis laceratis. On dead wood. Forres, Rev. J. Keith. About 4 inch across ; conchiform, stemless, decurrent behind, Rey. M.J. Berkeley& Mr. C. E. Broome on British Fungi. 31 bright red-brown, rough, with rigid processes; hymenium - pallid; dissepiments lacerated. 1431. P. callosus, Fr. On dead wood. Glamis, Rev. J. Stevenson. 1432. P. (Resupinati) collabefactus, B. & Br. Strato gla- berrimo corticioideo ; poris primum e subiculo collabendo ex- cavatis brevibus ; margine obtuso. On dead wood. Glamis, Rev. J. Stevenson. The barren parts resemble exactly a very smooth Corticium after the fashion of C. caleeuwm ; the pores seem first to arise from the mere collapsing of the substance, always shallow ; margin obtuse. 1433. P. (Resupinati) Renny, B. & Br. Subiculo crasso, pulvinato, pulverulento ; poris parvis, elongatis ; dissepimentis tenuibus. On wood, and running on to the ground. Hereford, J. Renny, Noy. 1873 ; Glamis, Rev. J. Stevenson. Forming a thick, at first somewhat frothy, then pulveru- lent mass, white, turning to lemon-coloured when ; pores sparingly produced, white, elongated. A very aia species. 1434. P. (Resupinati) blepharistoma, B. & Br. Totus re- supinatus, niveus; mycelio arachnoideo subfarinoso ; poris parvis ; dissepimentis tenuibus ; margine ciliato-dentatis. On dead wood. Glamis, 1874. Very thin and delicate ; the ciliato-dentate margin of the pores is very elegant. 1435. Hydnum squamosum, Fr. Ep. ed. 2, p. 598. Exhibited by W. G. Smith at the Fungus show, South Kensington, Oct. 1873. A very interesting addition to the British flora. 1436. H. melleum, B. & Br. Melleum, effusum, tenue; margine subtiliter byssoideo; subiculo dentibusque, apice acutis quandoque divisis, deorsum pulverulentis, medio nudis. On broken rails lying on the ground. Coed Coch, 1873. 1437. H. Stevensoni, B. & Br. Album, effusum, subtus farinaceum, hic illic byssaceum; aculeis cylindricis, obtusis vel truncatis quandoque compressis, apice pulverulentis. Glamis, Rev. J. Stevenson, March 1874. 1438. H. anomalum, B. & Br. Pallide flavum; strato tenui gelatinoso ; dentibus primum granuliformibus, dein stipi- tatis sursum obtuse divisis. In the inside of a very rotten ash tree. Near Langridge, Somersetshire, C. E. B., March 9, 1872. Substance of teeth tough, with large ovate or globose vesicles immersed in it; spores globose, shortly pedicellate. 32. Rey. M.J. Berkeley & Mr. C. E. Broome on British Fung? Resembles ppamanrse Corda, Anleit. fig. 71; but the substance is very different. to Fries’s genus Mucronella. PraTE I, fig. 1. oP cgi ant magnified; 4. horizontal section ; c, spores, both more highly magnified. 1439. Radulum tomentosum, Fr. _ ed. 2, p. 624. On Pyrus aucuparia. Menmuir, Rev. M. Anderson. 1440. R. deglubens, B. & Br. Orbiculare, ferrugineum, subdiaphanum; tuberculis erectis, sen 5 AT irregularibus, sparsis ; interstitiis levibus, e sporis albis pylverulentis. On ash, Jan. 30, 1874. Forres, Rev. J. Keith ; New Pit- sligo, Rev. J. F ergusson. About ' inch across. 1441. R. corallinum, B. & Br. Effusum, album ; subiculo nitido tenuissimo pelliculoso ; tuberculis fasciculatis deorsum divisis, obtusis, coralloideis. Scotland. Effused for 3 inches over oak-branches partially covered with lichens; fascicles of tubercles } inch or more across. 1442. R. epileucum, B. & Br. Effusum, ochroleucum, totum resupinatum ; subiculo niveo, strato ceraceo tecto ; tuberculis sparsis cylindricis, apice sub lente fimbriatis deciduis. On decorticated wood. Glamis, Rev. J. Stevenson. Effused for several inches ; tubercles falling out and showing the white mealy subiculum, round which is an annular depression. 1443. Grandinia er ustosa, P.; Fr. Ep. ed. 1, p. 528. On Polyporus versicolor. Gl amis, Rev. J. Stevenson, Feb. 1874. 1444. Kneiffia subgelatinosa, B. & Br. Tenuis e subflavo cremicolor; granulis minutis subgelatinosis, apice fimbriatis. On stumps of felled firs. Glamis, Rev. J. Stevenson, April 1874. Accompanied by a green alga, which penetrates the tissue of the fungus. 1445. Craterellus clavatus, Fr. Ep. ed. 1, p- 533. In a beech wood. Bisham, Berks, Rev. G. H. Sawyer. 1446. Cyphella fraxinicola, B. & Br. Minuta, otitis extus nivea breviter villosa; disco flavo e sporis fuscescente, prolifero. On ash. Batheaston, Dec. 20, 1873. 1447. Hyphelia rosea, Fr. New Pitsligo, Rev. J.F ergusson. Spores minute, globose. 1448. Clavaria curta, Fr. On the ground. Coed Coch, Holme Lacy. * Clavaria tuberosa, Sow. On sticks. Forres, Rev. J. Keith. Exactly the long- lost plant of Sowerby, which is perhaps Rey. M. J. Berkeley & Mr.C. E. Broome on British Fungi. 83 too near OC. ardenia; and possibly the same may be said of C. juncea, notwithstanding the great difference of size. * Hydnangium carneum, Wallr. This has occurred lately to Dr. Dickson at Edinburgh about the roots of Hucalyptus. Spores *013—-014 inch in diameter. 1449. Leptostroma.glechomatis, B. & Br. Maculis fulvis ; peritheciis irregularibus, minutis, epiphyllis. On leaves of ground-ivy. Scotland. Spores minute, oblong. 1450. Leptothyrium pictum, B. & Br. Maculis rufis hic illic pallidioribus, fertilibus fusco marginatis; peritheciis nitidis ocellatis ; sporis subeymbeeformibus curvulis. On leaves of Lonicera. Glamis, Rev. J. Stevenson. A very pretty and distinct species. #1. Juglandis occurred abundantly last year on the green eoat of walnuts; on examination the spores were just those in Madame Libert’s specimens on ts see ar Spores 0008 inch long, but not (as she says) ellipsoid. 1451. Stilbum cuneiferum, B.& Br. Stipite sursum parce ramoso, vel simplici; capitulis ovatis ; sporis cuneitormibus. On rotten cabbage-stalks. Batheaston, April 1873. | Men- tioned in Rabenh. no. 1662, as mixed with Periconia brasst- ceecola. Stems attenuated upwards, simple, or slightly divided, con- sisting of compacted threads, which are free above and bear the obversely wedge-shaped, pale greenish-brown spores, which are *0004—"00045 inch long. Habit that of S. rigidum. Prats I. fig. 2. a. plant i situ, slightly magnified; 5. tip, more highly magnified ; ¢, d. spores. 1452. Periconia brassicecola, B. & Br. Sporis irregularibus, ovatis, pallide brunneis, utroque apice plus minus attenuato. Forming dense masses in the inside of rotten cabbage-stalks. Batheaston, April 1873. Stem black ; heads globose, at first grey, then black ; spores 0002-0004 inch long, cinereous. Pratt I. fig. 3. a. plant in situ; b. portion of the head ; ¢. portion of the stem; d. spores. All more or less highly magnified. 1453. P. Phillipsii, B. & Leight. Minutissima ;_stipite sursum attenuato; capitulo globoso; sporis globosis, granu- latis. 12 Trefriw, Rev. W.A. Leighton, 1874. On soil with a minute species of Thelocarpon. Stem about equal in height to the diameter of the head,- thick for the size of the plant; spores ‘0004 inch in diameter. Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Ser. 4. Vol. xv. 3 34 Rev. M.J. Berkeley & Mr.C. E. Broome on British Fungi. Looks at first sight like a little Sphinctrina. So minute that it is quite invisible to the naked eye. 1454. Peronospora calotheca, De By. On Galium aparine. Forden, April, Rev. E. Vyse. 1455. P. interstitialis, B. & Br. Maculis luteis, a venis limitatis ; floccis brevissimis, flexuosis; sporisovatis terminatis. On leaves of primrose. Glamis, Rev. J. Stevenson ; Men- muir, Rev. M. Anderson. Spots hypophyllous, yellow, confined to the interstices of the veins, or very rarely extending slightly beyond them ; spores often seated obliquely, *0006--0007 inch long. Allied to P. obliqua, Cooke. 1456. P.rufibasis, B. & Br. Maculis epiphyllis nitidis fulvis; hypophyllis pallidis ; sporophoris linearibus ; sporis obovatis aoneaevs variis, oblique sitis, brevissime pedicellatis. On leaves of Myrica gale. Glamis, Rey. J. Stevenson. The spots on the —o surface of the leaves are very con- spicuous. Closely allied to P. obliqua and the last. Spores very variable in length. 1457. Penicillium megalosporum, B. & Br. Niveum, breve ; floccis fasciculatis ; sporis globosis elongatisque levibus. In an old chicken-coop. Menimuir, Rev. M. Anderson. Spores *0005-"001 inch in diameter, or equally variable when oblong. * Fusarium minutulum, Cd. On rotten boards. St. Catherine’s, Bath, Jan. 5, 1874. Spores ‘0002 inch long. 1458. Cylindrosporium rhabdospora, B. & Br. Maculis amphigenis, orbicularibus, brunneis; sporis albis radiantibus, oblongis, triseptatis, obtusis, utrinque paululum excavatis. On leaves of Plantago. Glamis, Rev. J. Stevenson. Spores forming little radiating fascicles, oblong, slightly hollowed out at the sides, ‘0008-002 inch or more iis. Sometimes a second is developed at the tip of the first. *(, ficarie, B. Common on leaves of Ranunculus ficaria. This is placed by Cooke in Glewosporium ; but the spores are not contained in a perithecium. Cylindrosporium concentricum, Grev., is, on the contrary, a true Glaosporium, and is not un- common on cabbage-leaves. 1459. C. niveum, B. & Br. Maculis fusco marginatis; sporis niveis, oblongis, uniseptatis, breviter pedicellatis. On Caltha palustris, New Pitsligo, Rev. J. Fergusson. Spots numerous, crowded, one or two lines across, often a a spores oblong, uniseptate, when fully grown about ‘002 inch long. Rey. M.J. Berkeley & Mr.C. E. Broome on British Fungi. 35 1460. Septoria hyperiet, Desm. Ann. d. Se. Nat. 1842, v. 17. p. 110. Glamis, Rev. J. Stevenson. Spores *002 inch long. 1461. S. stachydis, Desm, /. c. 1847, v. 8. p. 19. On leaves of Stachys sylvatica. Glamis, Rev. J. Stevenson. Spores slender, thread-like, ‘001--0015 inch long. 1462. Melanconium elevatum, Cd. On oak. Langridge, Dec. 1872, C. E. B. Spores ‘0005 inch long. 1463. Pestalozzia funerea, Desm. On dead Cupressus macrocarpa. Hatton, near Hounslow. 1464. Puccinia Andersont, B. & Br. Maculis orbicularibus, brunneo cinctis; soris hypophyllis minutis congestis; sporis oblongis, centro constrictis, obtuse apiculatis. On the underside of leaves of Cnicus heterophyllus. Falls of Noran, Glen Ogle, June 1874, Rev. M. Anderson. Spots visible only on the upperside, orbicular, surrounded by a brown border, and a central patch indicating the position ot the minute crowded sori, which are almost concealed by the pubescence of the leaf; spores very like those of P. dis- coideum as figured by Corda. This was originally found at the Den of Airlie by Mr. Gardiner. 1465. P. Fergussonit, B. & Br. Maculis pallidis; soris minutis in orbiculos congestis ; sporis oblongis, obtuse apicu- latis. On leaves of Viola palustris. New Pitsligo, Rev. J. Fer- gusson. This is very different from P. violarum, not only in the minute crowded sori, but in the elongated spores. 1466. P. senecionis, Libert, i. no. 92 ; Cd. fase. iv. fig. 54. On Senecio aquatica. Noran woods, Menmuir, Rey. M. Anderson. 1467. P. tripolii, B.& Br. Soris magnis ; sporis elongatis, apice truncatis binodulosis, vel appendice crassa mammeform1 preeditis. On leaves of Aster tripolium. New Pitsligo, Rev. J. Fer- gusson. We have no authentic specimen of P. asteris, Schwein ; bu samples from different parts of the United States diffe materially from the plant before us, of which, however, a present we have seen only a single specimen. 1468. Coleosporium pingue, Lév. Var. alchemille. | This appears not to be uncommon. ‘The sori are crowded, and radiate from the base of the leaf. We have it from Scotland and Wales ; and it occurs in Northamptonshire. 3* 36 Rey. M. J. Berkeley & Mr.C.E. Broome on British Fungi. 1469. Aecidium incarceratum, B. & Br. Soris minutis, in orbes irregulares congestis; peridiis omnino in parenchy- mate foliorum inclusis; sparsis pallidis. Rab. Exs. no. 1492. On leaves of Sagittaria. Bungay, Mr. Stocks. The tissue of the peridium is far more delicate than in most of the species. * EE. berberidis, P. On leaves of Mahonia. Glamis, Rev. J. Stevenson. Turning black when old. Some of the spores are embraced by the curved tips of the creeping mycelium, exactly after the manner of the supposed sexual phenomena in several Fungi. * 4. scrophularie, De C. On Serophularia nodosa. Woods of Fearn, Rev. M. Ander- son. Very highly developed, looking like a little orange Peziza with an inflexed border. These specimens do not turn brown. The above was written when we first received the plant from Mr. Anderson; but in subsequent specimens the sori of the etdium were surrounded with flat irregular dark specks, which on examination proved the following species of Uro- myces, which has lately appeared in the ‘Gardener’s Chronicle’ with a figure. 1470. Uromyces concomitans, B. & Br. Soris in annulum congestis irregularibus planis ; sporis obovatis, levibus ; pedi- cellis deorsum attenuatis. Surrounding eidium scrophularie. Woods of Noran and Fearn, Rev. M. Anderson. , 1471. Protomyces microsporus, Ung. Maculis candidis sporis globosis, pallidis. On leaves of Ranunculus ficaria. New Pitsligo, Rev. J. Fergusson. On examining the specimens of Cylindrosporium ficaricee in Berkeley’s ‘ British Fungi,’ we find the same globose bodies, and therefore suppose that there must be some intimate connexion between the two. Dr. Farlow, on his late visit to this country, brought specimens from De Bary which seemed to be identical. 1472. P.chrysosplenii, B. & Br. Maculis albis crassiusculis ; sporis globosis, hyalinis, pedicellatis. On leaves of Chrysoplenium oppositifolium. New Pitsligo, Rey. J. Fergusson. 1473. P. Fergussoni, B. & Br. Maculis punctisve brunneis, irregularibus ; sporis obovatis, primum hyalinis, brevissime pedicellatis, lowitonas dein fuscis. On leaves of Myosotis. New Pitsligo, Rev. J. Fergusson. These curious productions of very uncertain affinity are too Rev. M.J. Berkeley & Mr. C. E. Broome on British Fungi. 37 interesting to pass over, though further information is very desirable. 1474. P. menyanthes, De By. Brandpilz. p. 19; Rab. Exs. no. 1500. On leaves of Menyanthes. Bungay, Mr. Stocks. On Coma- rum palustre, Scotland. 1474 bis. P. macrosporus, Ung. On leaves and stalks of Acopodium. Rev. M. Anderson. 1475. Myzxotrichum ochraceum, B. & Br. Flavum, dein virens ; floccis sursum elongatis acutis, ramulis deflexis. On the shavings of hurdle-makers. Hermitage Woods, St. _Catherine’s, Bath, March 1874. Spores ‘00015 inch in diameter. When placed in alcohol they adhere in clusters as if surrounded by a membrane or in- volved in mucus. In &. eruginosum the flocci are hamate (a character appa- rently overlooked by Montagne, whose specimens we have re- examined), in J. deflecum branched to the extremity. In this they project without any branchlets far beyond the common mass. Pratt I. fig. 4. a. pee slightly magnified ; b. base of spines, forming a network; c. mass of spores; d. tip of spine; e. spores. All more or less highly magnified. 1476. Gyromitra gigas, Fr. On the ground. Coed Coch, Mrs. Lloyd Wynne, March 1874. It has also occurred to Mr. Currey. 1477. Vibrissea margarita, White, Scott. Nat. u. 1874, . 218. ‘ On wet wood. Perth, Dr. Buchanan White; Braemar Mor, Schron. Distinguished by its very hairy stem. 1478. Peziza (Helvelloidex) cochleata, B. alutacea, Fr. ; Scheeff. t. 150; Berg. t. 173. Bowood, C. E. B. 1479. P. (Geopyxis) ciborium, Fr. On the ground. C. Spencer Perceval. The larger form, which seems quite different from the Peziza figured in ‘ Flora Danica.’ There are a few brown mycelioid fibres at the base, while the earth above is filled with scattered patches of spawn. Sporidia ‘001 by °0004—-0005 inch. 1480. P. (Humaria) exiditformis, B. & Br. Orbicularis, luride purpurea; margine elevato inflexo; stipite sursum incrassato; sporidiis late ellipticis, binucleatis; hymenio eribroso. * On silver sand. Cork, Mr. D. Saunders, March 1873. On rotten wood, Stannage Park, C. E. B., March 1873. 38 Rey. M. J. Berkeley & Mr.C. E. Broome on British Fungi. Two lines or more wide. Contracting very much when dry. Paraphyses slightly clavate ; sporidia ‘0007 inch long, 0004 wide. 1481. P. (Humaria) fusspora, B. Lond. Journ. Bot. 1846 ; var. scotica, Rabenh. Exsicc. On heathy ground. Berwick, Dr. Johnstone; Menmuir, Rev. M. Anderson, Dec. 22, 1873. On turfy soil, New Pit- sligo, Rev. J. Fergusson. A very pretty species, varying from nearly white to orange or blood-red. Sporidia ‘001-0012 inch long, "0005 wide. 1482. P. (Lachnea) brunneola, Desm. On oak-leaves, Mr. Phillips. This is very probably the same as P. fuscescens, P, Des- maziéres says of his plant that the paraphyses are much longer than the asci, straight, fusiform, pointed, and as wide as the asci. In Mr. Phillips’s plant, however, the width of the asci as compared with that of the paraphyses is not exactly the same. The question, perhaps, is whether it should not be referred to Desmazierella. 1483. P. (Hymenoscyphe) strobilina, Fr. On fir-cones, Sfebtlasid: where it appears tobe common. The whole cone is sometimes covered with a floccose furfuraceous subiculum. 1484, P. (Mollisia) rubella, P. On decayed wood with P. vinosa. New Pitsligo, Rev. J. Fergusson. 1485. P. (Mollisia) Stevenson?, B. & Br. Minuta; stipite brevissimo sursum incrassato; cupulis subglobosis, saccharinis; sporidiis minutis subeymbeeformibus. On decorticated wood. Glamis, Rev. J. Stevenson. Minute, subglobose, sugar-coloured, externally minutely granular. Sporidia ‘0005 inch long. This is accompanied by white creeping threads, which give off erect branches bearing obovate spores ‘001 inch long. Probably a conidiiferous state. 1486. Helotium tuba, Fr., b. ochracea. On a heap of decaying vegetables. Menmuir, Rev. M. Anderson, March 1874. 1487. H. melleum, B. & Br. Pallide melleum; stipite brevi cylindrico; cupulis planis flexuosis; margine elevato inflexo; ascis elongatis, lanceolatis ; sporidiis biseriatis, fusi- formibus, uno latere curvulis, ical orem On rotten wood. New Pitsligo, Rev. J. Fergusson. About a line broad; stem half as much high; sporidia ‘0012 inch long. Allied to H. luteolum. 1488. H. sublateritium, B. & Br. Pallide lateritium ; sti- pite brevi cylindrico, subtiliter albo-villoso, glabrescente ; Rey. M. J. Berkeley& Mr.C. E. Broome on British Fungi. 39 cupulis planis, subtus venosis; margine elevato; ascis linea- ribus ; sporidiis uniseriatis, breviter fusiformibus, binucleatis. On stems of herbaceous plants. Glamis, Rev. J. Ste- venson. Sporidia -001 inch long, one fifth as much wide in the centre. 1489. Psilopezia myrothecioides, B. & Br. Suborbicularis; margine laciniato tomentoso, pallide flavo; disco viridi-atro ; ascis linearibus ; sporidiis ellipticis, margine pellucidis. On Prunus padus. New Pitsligo, Rev. J. Fergusson. Sporidia ‘0009 inch long. One of the most curious circumstances about this species is that some of the asci contain a very delicate spiral thread or line, a structure which Fuckel has observed in some other species. Prate II. fig. 5. a. plant, in situ, of the natural size; 5. ditto, magnified ; ec. asci; d. tip of ascus ; ¢. sporidia. All more or less highly magnified. 1490. Patellaria Fergussoni, B. & Br. Stipite brevi, sur- sum incrassato ; cupulis planis, extus fuscis, granulosis; hy- menio plano vel pulvinato luteo; ascis elongatis; sporidiis filiformibus ; paraphysibus capite globoso. On Prunus padus. New Pitsligo, Rev. J. Fergusson. Sporidia ‘009 inch long. Puare II. fig. 6. a. ascus ; b. sporidium; c¢. tip of paraphysis; d. cells of cup. All highly magnified. 1491. Ascobolus consociatus, B. & Br. Cupulis extus ru- gosis, granulatis, pallide flavis vel albidis ; ascis clavatis bre- vibus; paraphysibus linearibus; sporidiis octonis biseriatis, late fusiformibus. On the remains of Spheria cupulifera. Langridge, C. E. B., April 14, 1873. Cups ‘003-0105 inch in diameter. Puate II. fig. 7. a. plant, in situ; b. single cup; ¢. ascus with para- physes; d. sporidia. All more or less magnified. 1492. Nectria citrino-aurantia, Desm. Pl. Crypt. ser. 2, no. 778; Rab. Exs. no. 325. On willow-twigs. Batheaston, Dec. 1873. Densely czspitose; sporidia oblong, *0003--00035 inch long. Puate II. fig. 8. a, 6. plant, im situ; c. asci; d. sporidia. All more or less magnified. 1493. Spheria (Villose) membranacea, B. & Br. Semi- immersa; peritheciis amplis membranaceis, pilis brevibus flexibilibus tectis ; sporidiis breviter fusiformibus uniseptatis. 40 Rev. M.J. Berkeley & Mr.C. E. Broome on British Fungi. On very rotten wood. Langridge, April 27, 1874, C. E. B. Walls composed of large cells; sporidia *0015 inch long, ‘0007 wide. On the same wood with this species, and probably its stylo- sporous state, is a minute Sphwronema, tlask-shaped, with a long slender neck and minute globose spores. Prats IL. fig. 9. a. plant, in situ ; b. tissue of perithecia; c. ascus; d, sporidia. vi more or less highly magnified. * Venturia alchemille, B. & Br. Peritheciis minutis in maculas parvas stellatas congestis ; ascis brevibus lanceolatis ; sporidiis fusiformibus uniseptatis. On leaves of Alchemilla, on which it appears in the form of little jet-black stellate spots. New Pitsligo, Rev. J. Fergus- son, Dec. 31, 1873. Sporidia shortly fusiform, narrow, °0005 inch long, uni- septate. This is Asteroma, Grev., Stigmatea, Cooke; apparently owing its stellate appearance to the perithecia following the veins of the leaves. Fuckel’s specimens have the character- istic short hairs. * Dothidea betulina, Fr. Pycnidia of this species have been sent from the Rey. J. Stevenson, and very closely resemble those of D. ulm7, which have also been received from Scotland, and are equally refer- able to the genus Piggotia. 1494. Hysterium arundinaceum, Schr., var. gramineum ; H. culmigenum, var. B, Fr. Syst. v. 2. p. 591; Moug. & Nest. On leaves of grass. Torres, Rev. J. Keith. This agrees exactly with H. arundinaceum, and is the plant of Mougeot and Nestler, and not with H. culmigenum, to which the specimen in Cooke’s ‘ Exsiccata’ belongs. 1495. Mucor pruinosus, B. & Br. Pusillus, niveus; vesi- culis globosis, reticulatis ; sporis irregularibus. Covering with a thin white stratum the soil of garden-pots, the plants in which in consequence perished. Sibbertoft Nov. 1873. Spores ‘(0007-0012 inch long. Some decayed seeds of kidney-beans had been in the soil, and probably were the nidus of the mould. 1496. Thamnidium Van Tieghemi, B. & Br. T. elegans, Ann. d. Se. Nat. sér. 5. v. xvii. p. 321. On cabbage-stalks. Clearly quite different from 7. elegans (Ascophora elegans, Cd.), as a comparison of Van Tieghem’s figure and Corda’s Capt. F. W. Hutton on new Species of Crustacea. 41 will at once show. 7’. elegans has occurred in this country on fowl’s dung. 1497. Agaricus (Collybia) Stevensoni, B. & Br. Pileo semiovato, obtuso, viscido, pallide luteo hic illic e visco macu- lato; stipite tenui fibrilloso sursum pulverulento extus intus- ue bnfinlo radicato ; lamellis latis adnatis, dente decurrentibus istantibus candidis. Glamis, Rev. J. Stevenson, Aug. Pileus 4 inch across and high; stem 14 inch high, scarce a line thick, composed of fibres. Allied to Ag. ventricosus, but differing in its slender almost solid stem, viscid semiovate plane and very broad, adnate, somewhat ventricose plane gills. 1498. Agaricus (Hypholoma) si/aceus, P. Glamis, Rev. J. Stevenson. Pileus viscid, bright orange rufous; stem 4 inches high, at length hollow, solid and slightly swollen at the base. Smell resembling that of meal. Spores pale purple-brown. 1499. Cortinartus (Inoloma) traganus, Fr., var. finitimus, Weinm. p. 155. Torres, Rev. J. Keith. Smell not at all that of the typical form, but pleasant though feta resembling that of gum just beginning to ferment. ileus silky, at length smooth, lilac, as is the stem, which is yellowish and mottled within, but not saffron-coloured nor brown. This peculiar form is the more interesting as it has not been met with in Sweden. 1500. Hustegia arundinacea, Fr. Peziza Kneiffii, Wallr. New Pitsligo, Rev. J. Fergusson. Quite different from a form of Peziza fusca, which is named in some herbaria P. Knezffit. [To be continued. | Il].— Descriptions of two new Species of Crustacea from New Zealand. By Captain F. W. Hurron, C.M.Z.S. Sesarma pentagona. Carapace subquadrate, smooth, broader than long ; anterior lateral margin with two teeth ; front nearly vertical, with four rounded projections; lateral regions obliquely striated; a 42 Capt. F. W. Hutton on new Species of Crustacea. pore mark in the centre, the apex prolonged to the ront, which it divides. Area on each side of the mouth below with moniliform transverse striz. Arms trigonal, striated on the outside ; hands smooth outside, and with a few scattered granules inside; fingers smooth, Legs with the third joint very broad, compressed, acute above, and armed with a single tooth at the apex, smooth; outer joints and claws tomentose. Length *67 inch ; ratio of length to breadth 1: 1°27. A single specimen in the Colonial Museum, Wellington, locality not stated. Palinurus Edwardsit. Male. Carapace beaked, armed with spines and large oval depressed tubercles separated by rows of short hairs. Beak small, compressed, curved upward, and with two small spines at its base; spines on each side of the beak compressed and smooth. Abdomen transversely sulcated, and covered with flat tubercles, each segment with a row of short hairs on its posterior margin; a single tooth on the posterior margin of the lateral lobes of the abdominal segments. Anterior legs with a strong spine on the inferior margin of the second and third joints, none on the penultimate joint; the superior margin of the distal extremity of the third joint of the last four pairs of legs armed with two spines, a smaller one in front of the larger. Length from beak to end of telson 9°5 inches. Colour. Carapace and antenne dark brownish purple; abdomen the same, marbled with yellow; legs and caudal appendages reddish orange, more or less cs with purple. In the female the beak is wanting, and there is a spine on the inferior margin of the distal extremity of the penultimate joint of the last pair of legs, making it subchelate. Locality. Otago Heads, common. This species differs from P. Lalandii in its much smaller size, in the shape of the beak (which is straight and conical in P. Lalandii), in having no spine on the penultimate joint of the anterior legs, and in having a second small spine at the distal extremity of the third joint of the last four pairs of legs. I have named it in honour of M. Alphonse Milne- Edwards, who has done so much to increase our knowledge of New-Zealand carcinology. On a new Genus of Carboniferous Polyzoa. 43 IV.—Note on a new Provisional Genus of Carboniferous Polyzoa. By R. Eruerrpee, Jun., F.G.S. [Plate IV. B. figs. 1-4.] HYPHASMOPORA, gen. noy. * Polyzoarium dendroid (?), calcareous, composed of small cylindrical stems, often bifurcating. Cell-depressions arranged in linear longitudinal series, more or less separated from one another by a cancellated network or reticulation, forming the sdiestitial inieiave; and predominating at one part of the poly- zoarium more than at others, presenting a longitudinal zone, devoid, or nearly so, of cell-depressions. The interstitial net- work consists of a series of irregularly formed pores. The fragments to which I have provisionally applied the above name consist of small occasionally bifurcating stems, with nearly the whole of the surface occupied by six or more longitudinal rows or series of pyriform and (for the size of the organism) large cell-depressions, subalternating one with the other. The imtermediate and remaining portions of the in- terstitial surface, between each longitudinal series and each individual cell, are occupied by small, irregularly formed, but generally elongate pores, forming a reticulated or cancellated network. ‘This is more particularly the case over one part of the surface, generally devoid of cell-depressions, but occasion- ally with a single row running up the centre, or one or two irregularly placed. This space is bounded by the two lateral rows or serles of cell-depressions, one occupying each side of the stem. At times the poral reticulation between the longi- tudinal series of cell-depressions is almost absent, or consider- ably reduced, when, the lateral prominent margins of two contiguous series uniting, a dividing ridge or keel is formed, which, when viewed transversely, gives to the cross section of the stem a slightly multiangular appearance. The cell-depres- sions lead upwards and inwards to the true cell-aperture or orifice, considerably smaller than the larger opening, and ap- parently oval in outline. The cells are at first vertical, and then curve obliquely up- wards and outwards to the surface, where they open at right angles to the imaginary axis, the pyriform depression in which * Upacya, tissue or web ; mopos,a passage or pore. [The specimens are in the collection of the Geological Survey of Scotland; and this descrip- tion is published by permission of the Director-General of the Geological Survey. | 44 On a new Genus of Carboniferous Polyzoa. the orifice is placed having a prominent margin, projecting a little from the surface of the stem at its raat Bhs whilst the true orifice itself projects at its lower margin. At the point at which the cells bend from the perpendicular to the oblique angle at which they pass to the surface, one of the walls is much constricted, that nearest the external surface. I have never seen this pretty coralline in any other condition than such fragments as are here figured; but a specimen has lately come under my notice in which there appears to be the remains of a lateral branch or dissepiment, after the manyer of Polypora or Fenestella; but on this point I am in doubt. Under these circumstances it would be premature to state whether the habit was simply dendroid, with free stems and branches, or reticulate. I submitted specimens of the simple bifurcating stems to Mr. Busk, who very kindly informed me that in such a con- dition they resembled the genus Vincularia, Defrance, but that none of its hitherto described species were so pitted or reticu- lated, and that, as the openings of the cells do not appear to be placed on all sides of the stems, as they are invariably in Vincularia, it is probably the type of a new genus, perhaps allied to the latter. As I am unable to meet with any generic diagnosis which would include the form, I have adopted, provisionally at least, the foregoing name for its reception, and for a specific desig- nation would associate with it the name of Mr. Busk, to whose kindness I am indebted for much information on fossil Polyzoa. In addition to this species, there are one or two others in my possession which will perhaps come under this genus. Hyphasmopora Buskii, sp. nov. Cell-depressions pyriform, subalternating with one another, narrowing towards their ventral margins, expanding above, where they project a little from the surtace of the polyzoarium, arranged in about six linear series, the er depressions of each row separated from one another vertically by the in- terstitial reticulation ; laterally the margins of contiguous rows sometimes unite, forming dividing ridges or keels; cell-orifice round, placed within the cell-depression at its upper extremity. The interstitial network encloses a series of irregular poral openings. The sides are occupied by the two lateral rows of cell-depressions. The reverse, over which the reticulation at- tains its greatest development, sometimes has a single row of large cell-depressions placed along the median line, at various distances from one another. Dr. J. E. Gray on the Madagascar River- Tog. 45 Localities. Limekilns Old Quarry, near Limekilns House, near East Kilbride, from shale between the first and second limestones of the Calderwood series, Lower Carboniferous Limestone group; Calderside Old Quarry, near East Kilbride, from a similar geological horizon: collected by Mr. James Bennie. Mousewater, opposite Lambcatch, near Wilsontown, from shale between two thin limestones of the Lower Carbo- niferous Limestone group; quarry near Hillhead, near Wil- sontown, from shale over the Guildhouse Limestone, Lower Carboniferous Limestone group: collected by Mr. A. Macco- nochie (collection of the Geological Survey of Scotland). EXPLANATION OF PLATE IV. B. [The figures are all considerably enlarged. ] Fig. 1. Hyphasmopora Buskit, a bifurcating stem, showing the longitu- dinal series of cell-depressions, with a peculiar swelling of the interstitial surface. Fig. 2. The same. In this specimen are visible a few of the true cell- orifices. Fig. 3. The same, showing the opposite face or interstitial zone, with its single row of cell-depressions. Fig. 4. The same, a similar specimen to the last, but the branches with a wider angle of bifurcation. V.—On the Madagascar River-Hog (Potamochcerus), and on the Skulls of the three Species of the Genus. By Dr. J. E. Gray, F.R.S. &e. [Plate IV. A.] Fxacourt, in his ‘ History of Madagascar,’ notices a wild boar in that island; and D’Aubenton, in his additions to Buffon’s ‘ Hist. Nat.’ xiv. p. 390, describes a dry head of a “ sanglier de Madagascar” in the Cabinet of Paris, which he says 1s that of a ‘‘cochon de Siam ;” but by his description it is evidently that of a river-hog (Potamochewrus). I noticed it as a species of that genus in ‘ Proc. Zool. Soc.’ 1868, p. 38, more especially as Mr. Sclater informed me that there was a living specimen of the animal from Madagascar in the Garden of Plants at Paris; and in the ‘Catalogue of Car- nivorous, Pachydermatous, and Edentate Animals in the British Museum,’ 1869, p. 344, I named it Potamocherus madagascariensis, observing that I was not aware of any spe- cimen in this country. I now find, which had escaped me 46 Dr. J. E. Gray on the Madagascar River-Hog. when I gave the name madagascariensis to this species, that M. Grandidier, in the ‘ Revue et Magasin de Zoologie,’ 1867, tome xix. p. 318, had named the wild pig from Madagascar Potamocherus Edwardsii; and I gladly adopt his name, as it was published previously. All M. Grandidier says respecting this species is :—‘‘P. Edwardsii (nob.). Nom es te Lambou. De la cédte §.0. (Moroundava). Roux-cannelle, criniére blanchatre, épaisse ; membres d’un brun foneé. ‘Taille petite. Les soies sont trés- longues ; les oreilles sont dépourvues de pinceau de poils a leurs extrémités; joues noires, encadrées de longues soies blanches.”’ The British Museum purchased of Mr. Edward Bartlett a young specimen of a wild pig from Ambodiaque, west of ananarivo, the capital of Madagascar, which he names “ Potamocherus madagascariensis.” I have compared with this specimen a young bosch-vark (Potamocherus africanus) in the British Museum from South Africa, and I can find very little difference between it and the much younger specimen from Madagascar received from Mr. Bartlett. The latter has the longer white hairs on the chine, which are black at the base and form a black spot between the ends of the bladebones; and it agrees in the general colouring, and only differs from the larger specimen in having the short black stripes on the sides rather less indistinct, evidently the remains of the dark spots with which the very young bosch-varks are marked. The skull of this specimen, which is probably that of a female, kas the impressions on the side of the nose only slightly defined, and the zygomatic arch is thin and with a rounded outline beneath. ‘The nose is slender and rather flat, and rounded on the sides of the upper edge, but was in too young a state to afford any specific characters. I was inclined to believe it to be the young of the continental species. I had not seen an adult skin from Madagascar ; and unfortunately the skull was in too young a state to show the characters of the species. But Mr. Edward Gerrard, jun., has since brought to the Museum the skull of an adult male river-hog (Potamocherus) from Tamatava forest in Madagascar, which proves that the Madagascar animal is a very distinet species, characterized by the narrowness of the nose, with a rounded upper edge, the width of the skull at. the zygomatic arch, and the angular outline of the lower edge of this arch, and by the situation of the aperture for the vessel in the lower jaw, which seems to be a permanent character, as it is uniform Dr. J. E. Gray on the Skulls of Potamochcerus. 47 in the six or eight skulls of P. africanus and P. porcus in the British Museum. The three species of this genus may be thus characterized by their skulls :— * Head and face varied with blackish ; fur elongate, harsh. Crest of the sheath of the upper canines elongate in the male. P. africanus. Nose of skull broad, flat at top, and keeled at sides ; lower edge of zygomatic arch regularly curved. South and Central Africa. P. Edwardsti. Nose of skull narrow, rounded at top and upper margin of sides; lower edge of zygomatic arch sub- angy a in the middle. (Plate IV. A.) a dagascar. ** Head and face varied with white ; dorsal mane white. Crest of the sheath of the upper canines of the male shorter, broad. P. porcus. Nose of skull broad, flat at top, and keeled on the upper margin. West coast of Africa. They may be further characterized as follows :— * The zygomatic arch swollen out, with an irregularly rounded lower edge ; the impression on the side of the forehead broad and trun- cated behind, with a perpendicular edge just before the orbit ; the lower jaw with the perforation for the passage of the vessel under the space between the second and third lower grinders ; the front of the upper part of the nose flat, broad, rather keeled on the sides. Potamocherus porcus, Gray, Hand-Cat. B.M. tab. 23. fig. 1, ¢, The lobe over the sheath of the upper canines of the male truncated, spreading outwards, and not reaching the callosity of the lateral ridge on the side of the nose. Potamocherus africanus, Gray, Hand-Cat. B.M. tab. 23. fig. 2,3. The lobe over the sheath of the upper canines of the male elongate, adpressed to and reaching the callosity of the lateral ridge on the side of the nose. 48 Dr.J.E. Gray on the Skulls of Potamocheerus. ** The zygomatic arch swollen out, broad in the middle, andwith a pro- duced subangular lower edge ; the impression on the side of the forehead rather narrow, obliquely truncated, produced above so as to have an oblique edge, extending forward in front of the orbit ; lower jaw with a perforation for the passage of the vessel under the space between the first and second lower grinders ; the front of the upper part of the nose narrow, flattish, rounded on the sides. Potamocherus Edwardsii. The lobe over the sheath of the upper canines elongate, adpressed, and reaching the callosity of the lateral ridge on the side of the nose. The lobe over the base of the sheath of the canines in the males is elongate and adpressed to the sides of the nose, as in P. africanus, and not short and diverging outwards as in P. porcus. The skull has a much slenderer nose, is much lower behind, and has a narrower occipital end than in either of the continental species, in both of which it is high and broad behind and has a broad square nose. The skulls of the female river-hogs (Potamocherus) only have a sharp ridge across the base of the sheath of the canines ; and the sides of the nose are smooth, and not callous and warty in the middle part as in the males; and the impressions on the sides of the forehead just before the eyes are not so deep and well marked as in the skulls of the males; and the lobe of the maxillary bone forming the front portion of the maxillary arch is broader than in the males. The lobe over the base of the canines of the males of P. porcus is compressed, callous, and rugose at the ends. It seems to vary in shape: in two skulls in the Museum from the Cameroons and Gaboon it is moderately broad, with a rounded outer edge and a convex rounded outer sur- face ; and in one from West Africa (believed to be from the Niger) it is flattened, broader, and with a much flatter surface. The lobes over the base of the canines of the males of P. africanus are longer and broader; one has a distinct keel on the hinder part of the outer side; and the other has but very slight indications of such a keel and is rounded. Mr. R. J. L. Guppy on new Species of Bivalve Mollusca. 49 VI.—On new Species of Bivalve Mollusca found at Cumana, Venezuela. By R. J. LecumMere Guppy, F.L.S., F.G.S., Ke. [Plate VII. figs. 1 & 2.) One of the shells now to be described is a large and fine species of Venus. If I mistake not, this species has been regarded by some as the V. crenulata of Chemnitz; but the shell which I have for years considered to be that species is a smaller and very different one. The other shell is a Mactra, not belonging to the typical group of that genus, but, on the contrary, somewhat of an aberrant form. It is a large and interesting species. The recent, not less than the fossil, shell-fauna of Cumana is very interesting. Among the recent shells are several which are by no means common in the West Indies—as, for instance, the true Persona reticularis (Linn.), which, though nearly allied to, must not be confounded with the P. clathrata of Madagascar nor with the fossil P. s¢millima of the West- Indian Miocene. Dipsacus glabratus occurs at Cumana; and I have also from that place an undetermined species of Fusus (which resembles young shells of Fasciolaria gigantea, except that it has a longer canal), and also the following—Solarium tessellatum, Phos gquadelupensis, Venus fleruosa, Calyptrea auriculata (of which apparently there is a good figure in the large edition of Cuvier’s ‘Regne Animal,’ pl. 48. f. 4, under the name of C. Cuvier?, Desh.), Oliva SPY (several forms), and O. monilifera, Reeve (?= 0, mutica, Say, =nitidula), Venus superba, n. sp. Pl. VII. fig. 2. Ovate, slightly subtrigonal, a little inequilateral, ventricose ; anteriorly produced and rounded; posteriorly produced and subangulate ; umbones closely approximate; lunule large, striated with irregular diverging lamellae, distinctly defined by a sharp groove; posterior dorsal area large, striate, not distinctly defined. Valves marked with numerous irregular angulate streaks of chestnut or brown, and adorned with numerous concentric crenate ribs, which are rather more distant, thinner, and more distinctly crenate near the anterior and posterior margins ; on the disk the ribs are square, flattened, and polished, and the crenation is less marked. Length 70 millims., height 55, thickness about 45. Mactra anserina,n. sp. Pl. VII. fig. 1. Oval, compressed, subequilateral, gaping widely posteriorly ; Ann. d&: Mag. N. Hist. Ser. 4. Vol. xv. 50 Mr. R. J. L. Guppy on anteriorly somewhat produced and subangular; posteriorly high, with a decided obtuse angle formed by a low keel running from the umbo, on the upper and posterior side of which keel the shell is covered with a black epidermis. Valves flattened, white, rather fragile, marked with concentric strize of growth, which are worn smooth on the disk and umbones, but towards the ventral margin are covered with a yellowish- brown wrinkled epidermis. Length 85 millims., height 60, thickness 30. Closely allied to M. fragilis, which, indeed, appears to have been confounded with it. The details of the hinge are some- what similar to those of the hinge of Hemimactra gigantea ; but the postcarinal area resembles that of Schizodesma. The latter feature is much developed in our shell, and is remark- able for its black epidermis, that of the other portions of the shell being of a light brown. VII.—Notice of some Marine Shells found on the Shores of Trinidad. By R. J. LecoMERE Gurpy, F.L.S., F.G.S., &e. [Plate VII. figs. 3 & 4.] Purpura trinitatensis, Guppy. A solid, ovate, yellowish, subrimate shell, adorned with numerous rounded spiral ridges, which are crossed by fine imbricating strize: whorls about 6, with four spiral rows of obtuse elongated tubercles, of which the two upper rows are much the largest, the superior one forming the angle of the whorls : suture hidden by a row of stout curved and reflected lamellae, of which there are about three above each of the tubercles on the angle of the whorl: spire conic, sharp: mouth pink within, and often ornamented with two or three more or less interrupted spiral red or chestnut lines correspond- ing to the external rows of tubercles: aperture oval, with a sinall and decided posterior canal forming the successive sutural lamelle; anterior canal open and a little reflected: pillar-lip smooth, flattened or hollowed out, bright pink ; outer lip den- ticulate, obsoletely striate within. Height 40 millims., greatest breadth 27, longest diameter of aperture 26. Hab, Gulf of Paria. A species somewhat resembling P. mancinella, but with a sharper spire and a more decided striation. The sutural lamella are well developed, like those of P. coronata. ‘There is a strong’ idge round the base, Marine Shells from Trinidad. 5) Cardium eburniferum, Guppy. Pl. VII. fig. 3. Shell a little angularly suboval, moderately tumid: externally marked with irregular orange-brown spots, and adorned with thirty-five narrow imbricated ribs sleseby covered towards the margins of the shell with numerous porcellaneous semitubular tubercles, which are thicker anteriorly ; posterior edge nearly straight, strongly serrate. Hinge-teeth ——, strong. Interior salmon-colour, growing white towards the strongly dentate margins, which are yellowish. Height 52 millims., length 45, thickness 40. Hab. South coast of Trinidad (7. W. Carr), Found abun- dantly at Grenada. Cardium haitense, Sowerby, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. vi. p. 52, pl. x. f. 11. An oblique subovate shell, with 20-24 radiating, nodose, rather square ribs wider than their finely crenate interstices. Allied to C. subovale, Brod. This was originally described by Sowerby as a fossil from Haiti; but I have dredged two small examples of it in the Gulf of Paria. Arca centrota, Guppy, Proc. Scientific Assoc. of Trinidad, p- 175 (Dec. 1867). Pl. VII. fig. 4, This species was described as a fossil; but I have since ascertained that it is likewise living on our coasts, having been collected by myself on the shores of the Gulf of Paria, and by Mr. Carr on the south coast of Trinidad. Its umbones are often pink or red, which colour is visible inside as well as outside ; and the shell has a hairy epidermis, generally worn off at the umbones, Height 17 millims., length 24, The following is the original description :—“ Transversely subrhomboidal, with a strong wide carination running from the umbo to the posterior angle; ornamented with many (36-38) squamosely nodose radiating ribs, each with a fine subsidiary thread-like rib in the narrow interstice; anterior margin short, rounded; posterior margin strongly sinuate, angulate above with the hinge-line, and forming a more rounded angle with the strongly crenate lower margin, Hinge-teeth small in the middle of the straight hinge, but becoming larger and diverging considerably towards the angles; ligamental area more or less grooved, especially anteriorly.” 4* 52 Prof. T. R. Jones and Mr. J. W. Kirkby on Thracia dissimilis. Ovate-oblong, compressed, white, roughened by numerous fine granules, which are generally arranged in lines radiating from the umbo; transversely excentrically plaited ; anteriorly rounded ; posteriorly i aad truncate, with a keel (most prominent on the smaller valve) running from the umbo to the lower posterior angle. Height 27 millims., length 40, thickness 15. This is nearly allied to 7. plicata, which Reeve (Conch. Icon. Thracia, 7) considered it to be. Our shell is rather interme- diate between 7. plicata and T. magnifica, differing from the former in ornamentation and general shape. On a tablet in the British Museum the name dissimilis is applied to our species; but I have not been able to find any authority for that name, which I adopt for the shell. The animal is furnished with two long siphons, separate for the whole of their length and coarsely fringed. The epi- dermis along the posterior margin extends beyond the shell and covers the bases of the siphons. EXPLANATION OF PLATE VII. [ All the figures are of the natural size. } Fig. 1. Mactra anserina, right valve. Cumana, Venezuela. Fig. 2. Venus superba, right valve. Cumana, Venezuela. Fig. 3. Cardium eburniferum, right valve. South coast, Trinidad. Fig. 4a. Arca centrota, right valve, interior. Fig. 4b. The same, right valve of a large specimen, exterior. Port-of-Spain, Trinidad, Sept. 1874. VIII.—Notes on the Paleozoic Bivalved Entomostraca. No, XI. Some Carboniferous Ostracoda from Russia. By Prof. T. Rupert Jones, F.R.S., F.G.S., &c., and James W, Kirxsy, Esq. [Plate VI.] In the seventh livraison of the first volume of his ‘ Lethea Rossica ’* M, d’Eichwald figures and describes rent species of Palzozoic Entomostraea, twelve of which are from the * We refer to the French edition, published at Stuttgart in 1860. 7 ' Paleozoic Bivalced Entomostraca. 53 Carboniferous rocks of Russia. Most of these species had been previously noticed by him, though not figured, in the ‘ Bulletin Soc. mp. Nat. Moscou,’ année 1857, p. 198. M. d’Eichwald’s specimens are from the Carboniferous Limestone of Borowitschi, in the Government of Novogorod ; from Carboniferous Limestone on the right bank of the Serena, near Goroditz, in the district of Kozel, in the Govern- ment of Kalonga; from Carboniferous Limestone on the river Tscherepete, near Tschernischine, in the district of Likhwine, in the Government of Kalonga; from the Car- boniferous Dolomite of Sterlitamak, in the Government of Orenburg ; from the Cytherina-Limestone near the village of Filimonoff, on the river Oupa, in the Government of Toula; and from the Carboniferous Shale of Sloboda, also in the Government of Toula. From these materials D’Eichwald deseribes and figures the following species :— Beyrichia gibberosa, D’Eichwald, Bull S. L N. Muse. 1857, xxx. ii. p- 312; Ross. 1. v. 1859, p. 309, vii. 1860, p. 1349, pl. 52. f. 11. —— colliculus, D’ Eichvald, Bull S. L N. Mose. 1857, xxx. ii. p. 313; Leth. Ross. 1. v. 1859, p. 309, vii. ee 1348, pL 52. f. 1. —— umbonata, D’ Eichwald, Bull. 8. I. N. Mose. 1857, xxx. ii. p. 312; Leth. Ross. i. v. 1859, p. 29, vil. 1860, p. 1347, pl 52. f. 10. is is a Kirkbya. —— striolata, D’ Eichewald, Bull S. L N. Mose. 1857, xxx. ii. p. 312; Leth. Ross. i. v. 1859, p. 309, vii. 186), p. 1348, pl. 52. f 14. Whis is Kirkbya. itia microphtbalma, D’ Eichwald, Cypridina, Bull. 8. L N. Mose. D7, Xxx. it p. 310; Leperditia, Leth. Ross. i. vii 1860, p. 1336. Possibly a variety of L. Okeni. Bairdia Qualeni, D/ Hichwald, Bull. 3. L N. Mose. 1857, xxx. ii. p. 311; Leth. Ross. i v. 1859, p. 309, vii. 1860, p. 1339, pl 52. f 4. —— levigata, Dy Ei , Cypridina, S. L N. Mose. 1857, xxx. ii p- 310; Leth. Ross. i. v. 1559, p. 309; Bairdia, Leth. Ross i vii. 180, p- 1542, pl 52. £5; and var. migrescens. Both are Leperditiz, and probably varieties of L. Okens. : —— xquals, DEichwald, Ball. S. 1. N. Mose. 1857, xxx. ii. p. 311; 309, vii. 1560, p. 1240, pL 52. £ 6. — excisa, D/ Eicheald, S. LN. Mose. 1857, xxx. ii. p. 311; Leth. Ross. i. v. 1859, p. 309, vii. 1860, p. 1342, pL 52.£8 Possibly Cy- — S. L N. Mose. 1857, xxx. ii p. 311; 12. Very similar to Bardi £ mucronata, —— eurta, M‘Coy, D Eichwald, Ball S. L N. Mose. 1857, xxx. i. p 311; Leth. i vii. 1860, p. 1338, pl 52. £ 17, and var. Varieties. Judging from M. d’Eichwald’s published figures, some of the above species may be more appropriately placed in other 54 Prof. T. R. Jones and Mr. J. W. Kirkby on genera. Beyrichia umbonata and B, striolata seem to belong to Kirkbya; and Bairdia levigata is a Leperditia. Soon after the publication of the above-named work we were kindly favoured by M. d’Eichwald with a series of Russian specimens; and these have enabled us to arrive at a better understanding on some points of his Carboniferous species. We have also some other specimens, brought from Boinsis by the late Sir Roderick I. Murchison. Out of the eight species and their varieties (four) which we have identified among our Russian specimens, four have already been described as Carboniferous, two as Permian forms, one as Silurian, and four are new. ‘Three or four named by M. d’Kichwald we relegate to other authors. There remain six or seven of M. d’Eichwald’s Carboniferous species which we have seen in figures only. We figure the best of our Russian specimens in Plate VI. ; and the following observations will assist in defining the species. 1 & 1*. Leperditia Okent (Von Miinster fT), and var. ¢nornata (M‘Coy). Pl. VI. figs. 1 & 2. Bairdia levigata, var. nigrescens, D’Eichwald, Leth. Ross. i. vii. p. 1842, pl. 52. fig. 5. This species, so common in the Carboniferous formations of Britain, Europe, and Nova Scotia, occurs in great numbers in a piece of hard, dark-grey, saccharoid limestone, labelled “Bairdia levigata, var. nigrescens, village of Phillineonowa, in the Government of Toula.” The specimens, rather small, are all single valves, and of a blackish colour. The general contour of the carapace is nearly that of the typical L. Okeni. The eye-spot is not distinguishable. Primitia Eichwaldi, Corals, and Brachiopods are associated. From near Likhwine, in the same Government, we have a minute specimen of this species, with a well-marked eye-spot and a slight marginal rim (fig. 2). In the former feature it agrees with M. d’Hichwald’s figure of his “Bairdia levigata.” From the same locality, in a piece of soft yellow limestone, other rather larger specimens occur, which we also refer to this species. They differ in having the rear pee less oblique than is usual with L, Okeni, thus having a nearl semicircular hinder end. These might without much dif culty be mistaken for a Cythere, and indeed do occur in a piece labelled “Batrdia excisa.” This variety is not unusual + Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 3, vol. xv. p. 406, pl. 20, figs, 1-5, Paleozote Bivalved Entomostraca. 5d in the Carboniferous rocks of Scotland and Ireland; and may be regarded as ZL. Oken?, var. INORNATA (M‘Coy). M. d’Richwald’s figure of “Batrdia levigata”’ approximates to that of a Leperditia, and shows also the characteristic eye- spot. L. microphthalma, D’ Kichw., also appears to be related to L. Okent as a small variety. 1**, Leperditia Okent, var. obliqua, nov. Pi. VI. fig. 3. With the typical LZ. Okent from Phillineonowa we find a few specimens of a small Leperditia having a relatively short hinge-line, a long sloping posterior region, and a full ventral curve. Thisisnear L, Okeni, var. acuta (Ann. & Mag. N. H. ser. 3, vol. xv. p. 406, pl. 20. fig. 4) ; but it has a shorter hinge- line. In outline it approaches both LZ. Wisingert and L. Wil- liensis of Fr. Schmidt *, but agrees with neither. We propose to name this form var. OBLIQUA, as the greatest length is along a line much higher in front than behind. 2. Beyrichia intermedia, Jones & Holl. Pl. VI. fig. 11. Length 34; inch, height 34; inch. A minute, subovate, smooth Beyrichia, with a nearly semicircular ventral border and a deep subcentral sulcus, rather posteriorly placed; this sulcus cuts the valve vertically, and extends from the dorsal border to less than halfway across the valve; another, but faint, indentation exists near the smaller (anterior) extremity. In soft yellow limestone from near Likhwine, in the Govern- ment of Toula. This is undistinguishable from B. tntermedia, J. & H.+, from the Upper Silurian rocks of Malvern, except that its slightly greater length gives it a rather more oval outline. 3. Primitia Eichwaldi, sp. un. Pl. VI. fig. 12, a, b. Associated with the Leperditia of Phillimeonowa we have found some specimens of an Kntomostracan corresponding with the description of Primitia given in the ‘Annals,’ ser. 3, 1865, vol. xvi. p. 415, except that it has a reticulate and slightly wrinkled ornament. It is ~; inch long, = inch high; has elongate, oblong, flatly convex valves, with a straight dorsal border, a vertical sulcus in the posterior half, narrow above and broad below, * “Ueber die russischen silurischen Leperditien,” Mém. Acad. Imp. Se. St.-Pétersb. ser. 7, vol. xxi. 1873. { + Ann. & Mag. N. H. ser. 4, 1869, vol. iii. p. 218, pl. 15. f. 7, 56 Prof. T. R. Jones and Mr. J. W. Kirkby on and a slight rim bounding the free margin: the surface, in unworn examples, is reticulately ornamented, and is usually marked with numerous rather fine longitudinal wrinkles, due to the thickening of the longitudinal walls of the net- work, The Upper-Silurian P. variolata, J. & H. op. cit. p. 418, pl. 13. f. 6, is a near ally; but is shorter, has its sulcus more central, and shows only a pitted ornament. Some small bivalve carapaces from the Carboniferous strata of West Scotland t, and others from Shropshire, are allied to the form under notice, having suboblong outline, longitudinal wrinkles (stronger), and some fine reticulation ; but the sulcus is contracted to a central p7t, such as is found in some Primitic. We have also a small smooth form from Lanarkshire. 4, Bairdia equalis, D’Eichwald. Pl. VI. fig. 4. We identify a specimen from the yellow limestone of Likh- wine with this species. It is 7, mch long, 7, inch high, smooth, swollen, of a subtrapezoidal outline, with the pos- terior extremity blunt, and with a strong dorsal and ventral overlap. 5. Bairdia ampla, Reuss. Pl. V1. fig. 5. Two very fine examples of a Bairdia sent us by M. d’Eich- wald as B. curta, from Sloboda, in the Government of Toula, appear to us to belong to B. ampla, Reuss, known in both the Carboniferous and Permian formations. The perfect shape of B. curta, M‘Coy, has been given by one of us in plate 61. fig. 1, ‘ Monthly Microsc. Journ.’ vol. iv. 1870. 6*. Bairdia plebeia, Reuss, var. rhombica, Jones. Pl. VI. fig. 6. Included with the specimens of the last species is a single example of what seems to be, if not a distinct species, a rhombic variety of B. plebeta, described and figured in the ‘Trans. Tyneside Nat. Field-Club,’ vol. iv. 1859, p. 42, pl. 11. figs, 10, 11,12, B. plebeta is common in both the Carboni- ferous and Permian formations ; var. rhombica is Permian also, + “Kirkbya scotica,” J. & K. MS., ‘Trans. Geol. Soc. Glasgow,’ vol. iii. Supplem. Carb. Foss. p. 28. Unless specimens with concentric longitu- dinal ribs occur, this species will have to be allocated to Primitia. a Paleozoic Bivalved Entomostraca. 57 6**, Bairdia plebeia, Reuss, var. munda, nov. Pl. VI. fig. 7. We have one specimen of another variety of B. plebeta from the yellow limestone of Likhwine. It is rather more oblong than the usual form of the Permian B. plebeta, and its posterior angle is less developed. See Reuss, ‘‘ Ueber Entom.” &c., Jahresb. Wetterauer Ges. 1854, p. 67, f. 5. 7. Cythere (Potamocypris?) bilobata (Von Minster). PL. Wi, figa..8, 9,10; Bairdia excisa (?), D’Kichwald, Leth. Ross. i. vii. p. 1342, pl. 52. f. 8. We have three specimens of this species from the yellow limestone near Likhwine. ‘They were sent to us by D’Eich- wald labelled as “Bardia excisa.”” They nevertheless un- doubtedly belong to Von Miinster’s “Cythere (2?) bilobata’’t, to which we now refer them. D’Eichwald’s figures show a much greater constriction on the subconcave border than we find in our specimens. The recent Potamocypris fulva, G. 8S. Brady (Ann. & Mag. N. H. ser. 4, iu. pl. 18. figs. 1-4, and Nat. Hist. Transact. Northumb. and Durham, iil. p. 366), presents an external ap- pearance remarkably similar to that of Cythere (?) bilobata, 8. Cytherella Murchisoniana, sp.n. Pl. VI. fig. 13, a, d, fig. 14, a-c. In a fragment of brown crystalline limestone, from a locality 30 wersts east of Bugulina, collected by the late Sir Roderick Murchison, we have numerous specimens of a small Entom- ostracan, which probably belongs to the genus Cytherella. It is 5 inch long, and half as high. The carapace-valves (always separate) are oblong in outline, with the dorsal and ventral borders nearly parallel; the ends are rounded; the posterior extremity is most obtuse; and from the region ad- joining it the carapace contracts so as to give rather a wedge- shaped dorsal aspect. In casts a slight constriction crosses the valves near the posterior third (fig. 14,5). The shell is thick, and the surface apparently smooth. + Ann. & Mag. N. H. ser. 3, vol. xv. p. 409, pl. 20. f. 10. This species, not uncommon in some Carboniferous rocks of Britain and Europe, was described by us (loc. cit.) as a Cythere ; it is most probably either a Pota- mocypris or a Bairdia. 58 On Palwozoic Bivalved Entomostraca. List of the Carboniferous Ostracoda of Russia. Beyrichia gibberosa, D'Eichw. Sloboda. colliculus, D’Eichw. Tschernischine. intermedia, Jones & Holl. Tschernischine. Kirkbya umbonata (D’Eichw.). Sloboda. Prim striolata (D’Fichw.). Sloboda. itia Eichwaldi, Jones §& Kirkby. Phillineonowa. Leperditia Okeni (Von Miinster). Phillineonowa, Sloboda. , var. inornata (.W‘Coy). Tschernischine. , var. obliqua, J. & K. Phillineonowa. , var. microphthalma, D’Eichw. Goroditz and Sloboda. Cythere (?) bilobata (Von Miinster). 'Tschernischine and Sloboda. Bairdia excisa (?), D’Lichw. Tschernischine and Sloboda. — —— Go a Sloboda *. eia, Reuss, var. rhombica, Jones. Sloboda. , var. munda, J. & K. Tschernischine. equalis, D’Lichw. Sloboda. distracta, D’Fichw. (=? mucronata, Reuss). Borowitschi and roditz. Qualeni, D’Eichw. Sterlitamak. ple Cytherella Murchisoniana, J. § K. Near Bugulina. EXPLANATION OF PLATE VI. [All the figures, except fig. 12 b, are magnified 20 diameters. } Fig. Ki my aioli lie ay AD % moot Fig. 11. Fig. 12. Fig. 13. Fig. 14. * Un . Leperditia Okeni (Von Miinster) : right valve of small individual. Leperditia Okent, var. inornata (M‘Coy): left valve. . Leperditia Okeni, var. obliqua, nov. : left valve. Bairdia equalis, D’Eichw.: a, right side; 6, dorsal; c, ventral edge ; d, end view. . Bairdia ampla, Reuss: a, right side; }, ventral edge; c, end view. . Bairdia plebeia, Reuss, var. rhombica, Jones: left valve. Bairdia plebeia, var. munda, noy.: left valve. 9. Figs. 8 a, b, c, 9a, b, 10a, b,c. Cythere (Potamocypris?) bilobata (Von Miinster). Three individuals in various aspects. Beyrichia intermedia, Jones & Holl: left valve. Primitia Eichwaldi, sp. noy.: a, left valve, with wrinkled orna- ment; 5, ornament, from a reticulated portion, magnified 84 diameters. Cytherella Murchisoniana, sp. noy.: a, left valve ; 6, edge view. Cytherella Murchisoniana (cast): a, right valve; b, edge view ; c, end view. der the heading “Bairdia curta” in ‘Lethwa Rossica,’ loc. cit., M. d’Eichwald gives Tschernischine, Goroditz, Borowitschi, and Sloboda as localities for at least three varieties, and he quotes it also from the ‘Old Red Sandstone with Fucoids.”’ On new Genera and Species of Coleoptera. IX.—Notes on md age w and Spectes.—Part I List of Genera and Species. PRIONID/#. PRIONINZ. Miocydus (x. g.) prionoides. CLOSTERIN2. Elaptus brevicornis, CoOLPODERIN2. Eudianodes Swanzyi. CERAMBYCID®. CEMIN& ? Ectinope (n. g.) spinicollis. PHORACANTHIN2. Tryphocharia Mastersii. STRONGYLURINE. Lygesis mendica. URACANTHINE. Uracanthus strigosus. Emenica (n. g.) nigripennis. PyTHEINZ ? Titurius (7. g.) calcaratus. LAMIID&. DORCADIONIN®. Corestetha (n. g.) insularis. MonocHAMIN2. Monochamus fulvicornis. acanthias. CEROPLESIN. 59 ith Descriptions of new Genera I. By Francis P. Pascor, F.L.S. &e. (Plate VIII.] Eunithera (n. g. for Thysia viduata). Ceroplesis sumptuosa. aulica. PHRYNETIN2. Psycholupis (. g.) Fahrei, HEBESECIN2. Hebesecis anisocera. —— cristata. PROTORHOPALINZ. Protorhopala elegans, NIPHONIN2. Praonetha Dohrnii. Chetostigme (n. g.) casta. Corrhenes grisella, fulva. — cruciata. Symphyletes torquatus. Achniotypa (x. g.) basalis. Rhytiphora latifasciata, Penthea melanosticta. PERICOPTINZE. Bebelis picta. acuta. Miocypws. (Prionine.) Priono affinis, sed clypeo fronte continuato, labro inviso, antennis serratis, et tarsis brevioribus. The BP» except a few stiff hairs fringing its anterior margin, is quite hidden by the clypeus, which is not marked off from the front by any line or impression as in Prionus. The an- tenne have all the joints from the fifth to the tenth inclusive dilated on one side towards the apex. to be a male. My specimen appears 60 Mr. I*. P. Pascoe on new Genera Miocydus prionoides. Pl. VIII. fig. 9. M. nitide castaneus, subtus rufo-brunneus, supra irregulariter sat dense punctatus ; vertice capitis longitudinaliter canaliculato ; prothorace latitudine duplo longiore, utrinque bispinoso, angulis anticis rotundato, basi apiceque evidenter marginato ; scutello sat brevi, subscutiformi; elytris lateraliter gradatim angustioribus, tenuiter elevato-lineatis, apice late rotundatis ; antennis pedibus- que rufo-brunneis, illis corpore brevioribus ; sternis fulvo-hirsutis. Long. 9 lin. Hab. West Australia. Elaptus brevicornis. Pl. VIII. fig. 8. E. fuscus, vel rufo-castaneus, omnino tenuiter pubescens; an- tennis (¢) dimidium elytrorum paulo superantibus, (2) multo brevioribus ; oculis infra haud approximatis; prothorace tenuiter punctato; scutello apice late rotundato ; elytris sat vage punctatis, singulis lineis tribus modice elevatis munitis ; corpore infra pedi- busque pilis fulvescentibus longiusculis vestitis. Long.(¢) 8, (2) 9 lin. Hab. South Australia (Gawler). This species differs from . stmulator in the smaller eyes, less approximate beneath, in the shorter antenne, which in the male of that species extend to the end of the elytra, and in the much broader prothorax. Eudianodes Swanzyt. Pl. VIII. fig. 7. This species was shortly described by me in the ‘ Proceed- ings of the Entomological Society,’ 1868, p. xiv. Itis about 11 lines long, glossy black, inclining to a very deep chestnut- brown, with a fulvous trilobed patch on the prothorax. It differs generically from Colpoderus, inter alia, in its broader flat mesosternum and simple tibiz; that is to say, they are not carinated along the external edge, nor is the external apical angle bidentate as in Colpoderus. I owe my specimen (the only one I have seen, and apparently a female) to Mr. Swanzy, whose collector took it at Cape-Coast Castle. ECTINOPE. (Cmine ?) Caput breve, inter antennas excavatum ; clypeus latus, apice trun- catus ; labrum transversum. Oculi laterales, suboblongi, medio- criter emarginati. Palpi maxillareslongiores. Antenne setacese, corpore vix longiores ; articulo basali brevi, subcylindrico, tertio longiusculo, ceteris brevibus, subequalibus. Prothorax elongatus, and Species of Coleoptera. 61 supra inequatus. Scutellum scutiforme. E/ytra angusta, pro- thorace paulo latiora, Pedes mediocres ; femoru incrassata, inter- mediz et posticee subpedunculatee ; tibie apice calcarate; tarsi breves. Coac antice et intermedie subglobosze, haud contigue. Mesosternum horizontale. Abdomen corneum, segmentis longi- tudine fere sequalibus. Mr. Masters has sent me a single specimen of this new form, apparently a male. So far as I have been able to ex- amine it without dissection it appears to me to belong to the CEminz, a subfamily whose genera are mostly highly special- ized. I can say nothing of its affinities, except that its eyes are like those of Ciopera, and that in habit it resembles Neo- corus tbidionoides. Its anterior cotyloid cavities appear to be open behind; but of this | am not quite sure: a remarkable peculiarity is the erect spine on each side of the prothorax at the base, (owing to its direction) not noticeable in the figure. Ectinope spinicollis. Pl. VIII. fig. 3. E. anguste elongata, fulvo-testacea, sparse pilosa ; capite prothorace- que creberrime punctulatis, hoc latitudine fere duplo longiore, postice paulo angustiore, dorso tuberculis quinque, scil. duobus pone medium sitis, duobus prebasalibus, altero intermedio, basi utrinque spina valida erecta armato ; elytris paulo depressis, confertim punctatis, spatiis inter puucta subgranuliformibus, apicibus rotundatis ; corpore infra subnitido. Long. 4 lin. Hab. Sydney. Tryphocharia Mastersii, T. depressa, rufo-brunnescens, pone basin elytrorum subfasciatim fulvescens, vage pilosa; capite sat rude crebre, occipite sub- corrugato-punctato ; antennis ( 2 ) corpore manifeste brevioribus ; prothorace minus depresso, subtransverso, supra leviter vel fere obsolete punctato, tuberculis quinque indeterminatis instructo, lateraliter leviter tuberculato; scutello subtriangulari; elytris subnitidis, sat crebre punctatis, punctis ad apicem gradatim fere evanescentibus, apice singulorum breviter bispinoso; corpore infra pedibusque sat sparse griseo pilosis; femoribus in medio parum incrassatis. Long. 19 lin. Hab. Victoria (Melbourne). The genus 7ryphocharia was not adopted by Lacordaire, who, as he afterwards wrote me, was completely mistaken in his identification of the species on which it was founded *, * In another case I noticed that in his collection at Liége the genus Allotisis was represented by a small specimen of Phoracantha senio; there were two or three other Longicorns (and there might have been more) which were also wrongly named. 62 Mr. F. P. Pascoe on new Genera and whose intention it was to publish omissions aud corrections in a Supplement *. This fine species finds its nearest ally in T. Odewahnii, from which it differs in its bispinous and less closely punctured elytra, the slightly thickened femora, the tubercle (not spine) at the sides of the prothorax, &c. Judging from 7. Odewahnit, there is not much difference in the length of the antenne in the two sexes. Lygesis mendica. L. nitide castanea, postice pallidior, sparse griseo-pilosa; capite antice leviter producto; prothorace latitudine sesquilongiore, sat sparse irregulariter punctulato; scutello dense griseo-villoso ; elytris longiusculis, basi sparse punctatis; femoribus modice cla- vatis. Long. 4-43 lin. Hab. New South Wales (Rope’s Creek). Closely allied to L. cylindricollis ; but the elytra consider- ably longer, and the prothorax much less punctured; the punctures, however, are only to be seen in abraded examples. Uracanthus strigosus. U. silaceus, pilis fulvo-griseis vittatim vestitus ; capite modice elon- gato; mandibulis apice nigris; palpis ferrugineis; prothorace latitudine paulo longiore, utrinque in medio fortiter calloso ; elytris prothorace fere quinquies longioribus, apicibus introrsum emarginatis bispinosis, spina suturali et exteriore fortiter productis ; corpore infra pedibusque sat dense adsperso-villosis. Long. 9 lin. Hab. New South Wales (Rope’s Creek). - This species is readily distinguished by its fulvous-grey hairy stripes, the intervals naked; the prothorax is shorter than in the other species, and with a larger lateral callus. EMENICA. (Uracanthine.) Caput antice elongato-quadratum, inter antennas sulcatum ; clypeus magnus; labrum breve. Oculi mediocres, leviter emarginati. Antenne lineares, subvalide, corpore longiores, articulo basali breviusculo, tertio longitudine fere squali, ceteris longioribus, apice (ultimo excepto) obliquis. Prothorax oblongus, subcylin- dricus. Scutellum triangulare. lytra elongata, basi prothorace vix latiora, lateribus subparallelis, apicibus rotundatis. Pedes * In the ‘Genera’ (ix. p. 411, note) we are told that we should find this Supplement at the end of the volume; but at his lamented death it could not have been in a state for publication. and Species of Coleoptera. 63 breves ; femora modice incrassata ; tarsi lineares. Coa antice subglobosie, haud contigue. Mesosternum horizontale. Abdomen elytra superans. Lacordaire places Uracanthine in one and Stenoderinz in the other of the two “sections” into which he divides his “Cerambycides vrais Sylvains,” the former having coarsely, the latter (with certain exceptions) finely faceted eyes ; Emenica, therefore, will go with the former. Emenica nigripennis. Pl. VIL. fig. 2. £. brunneo-rufa, pedibus infuscatis, elytris (basi exceptis) nigris ; capite confertim punctato ; antennis fuscis, articulis tribus basa- libus nitidis, ceteris tomentosis ; prothorace confertim rude pune- tato, in medio linea longitudinali impresso ; elytris crebre punc- tatis, singulis lineis duabus parum elevatis munitis ; corpore infra fulvo-testaceo ; metasterno infuscato. Long. 6 lin. Hab. West Australia. TITURIUS. (Pytheine ?) Caput subverticale, productum ; frons lata, planiuscula. Oculi pro- funde emarginati. Palpi maxillares articulo ultimo fusiformi, apice obtuso. Antenne corpore breviores, ]1-articulate, ex- trorsum crassiores; articulo basali obconico, tertio quartoque eequalibus. Prothorax vix transversus, utrinque callosus, supra zquatus. lytra subdepressa, elongata, parallela, prothorace paulo latiora. Pedes breves; femora parum incrassata; tibie teretes ; tarsi subangusti, articulo ultimo elongato, unguiculis divaricatis. Cove antice globose, sejuncte, vix exserte. Pectus ante coxas transverse constricto-sulcatum. Corpus angustum, pilis volatilibus munitum. I have only a single specimen of this interesting Longicorn, which I refer, although with some hesitation, to the Pytheine. I adopt the term “ pili volatiles” after Schiddte for the long, slender, erect hairs sometimes found clothing the body, and often also the legs. The Danish author is of opinion that they facilitate flight by giving a greater circumference without increasing weight in the same degree. Would they not rather have a contrary effect ? The spur on the hind tibiz is possibly a sexual character. Titurius calcaratus. T. elongatus, capite antennisque chalybeatis, illo rude erebre punc- tato; prothorace sneo-micante, rude punctato; scutello nigro, transverso, apice rotundato ; elytris chalybeatis, basi rufis, irregu- lariter rude punctatis ; corpore infra nitide zeneo, vage punctulato ; 64 Mr. F. P. Pascoe on new Genera femoribus rufis; tibiis tarsisque subchalybeatis ; tibiis posticis apice supra spinoso-productis. Long. 3} lin. Hab. New South Wales (Rope’s Creek). CorESTETHA. (Dorcadionine.) Caput parvum, inter antennas latum, fronte transversa ; labrum amplum, antice rotundatum. Oculi late emarginati, fortiter granulati. Antenne corpore vix longiores, articulo basali sub- pyriformi, tertio longiusculo, recto, ceteris gradatim brevioribus. Prothorax oblongus, cylindricus, capite haud latior. Scutellum nullum. Elytra oblonga, prothorace haud latiora. Pecles breves ; femora valida ; tibie omnes breves, intermedi profunde emargi- nats, posteriores haud compresse. Core antice globose, sejuncte. Pro- et mesosterna elongata. Abdomen segmento basali duobus sequentibus conjunctim longiore. Closely allied to Mesolita; but while the posterior tibiz are scarcely as long as the tarsus, and terete, in Mesolita a are twice as long and compressed. The eyes have fewer facets than in any other species I have examined: in Mesolita trans- versa they are rather finely, while in JM. lineolata they are somewhat coarsely faceted. This is therefore one of those genera in which the facets of the eyes have only a specific value. The species described below varies in the testaceous becoming more or less of a smoky brown, like the general colour. Corestetha insularis. C. angusta, infuscata, subtiliter pubescens, supra confertim tenuiter punctulata; capite antice transverso; antennis testaceis, nigro annulatis, articulo basali oblongo-pyriformi ; prothorace latitudine sesquilongiore ; elytris fere obsolete striatis, fasciis duabus sub- testaceis, aliquando ad suturam interruptis, una basali, altera pone medium, obsitis ; pedibus subtestaceis, vel infuscatis. Long. 13-2 lin. Hah. Eclipse Island. Monochamus fulvicornis. M. angustus, fuscus ; antennis ( ¢) corpore plus duplo longioribus, clare fulvis, articulo basali excepto; capite griseo-pubescente, impunctato, in medio longitudinaliter sulcato ; tuberculis antenni- feris validis ; prothorace transverso, in medio leviter punctulato, spina laterali minus robusto; elytris modice elongatis, postice angustioribus, apicibus rotundatis, supra fere sequatis, modice punctulatis ; corpore infra pedibusque breviter griseo tomentosis ; tibiis anticis haud elongatis, flexuosis. Long. 8 lin. Hah. Japan (Nagasaki). and Species of Coleoptera. 65 This species was taken many years ago by Mr. Whitely, and was unknown to Mr. Lewis, who has formed extensive collections in Japan. I think it may be placed after IZ. vario- laris. Monochamus acanthias. M. robustus, pube sericante griseo-fulvescente tectus; capite antice punctis perpaucis impresso; antennis (¢) corpore plus duplo longioribus, 12-articulatis, pallidis, nigro-annulatis ; prothorace valde transverso, sparse punctulato; elytris ampliatis, postice angustioribus, apicibus angulo exteriore spina elongata armatis, supra inequatis, oblique biplagiatim saturatioribus, irregulariter sparse punctatis; corpore subtus pedibusque dense flavidulo- pubescentibus; tibiis anticis vix elongatis, flexuosis. Long. 12 lin. Hab. New South Wales (Manning River). The nearest allies of this species appear to be M. argutus and M. solatus ; the latter, which has a dull mottled greyish pubescence, has I believe been also taken at Cape York. The other Australian species have the apices of the elytra rounded. In this species the spine is comparatively unusually long and slender, and is directed towards the median line of the body. The tendency of the antenne to form a twelfth joint by the division of the eleventh is shown in many species by a dark ring, at about two thirds of the length of the latter, simulating a joint; in this case, though it may not be invariable, the separation is well marked. I have adhered to the original generic name as it was used by Latreille, Serville, and others. Monohammus (from povos and dupa) has no application, and is only misleading; and if such be its derivation, I take it that the orthography should be Monammus. E\UNITHERA. (Ceroplesinz.) A Thysia differt articulo basali antennarum cicatricoso, unguiculis divergentibus ; mesosternum elevatum, antice productum. The type Thysta viduata* (PI. VIII. fig. 4) is apparently so closely allied to Thysia that, notwithstanding its differently formed mesosternum, I had no hesitation in placing it in that genus. Since, however, the appearance of Lacordaire’s ninth volume I have reexamined it, and find that two important characters in the classification of that author, viz. the relative position of the claws to one another and the cicatrix of the basal joint of the antennz, would not strictly permit it to * Ante, Annals, ser. 4, vol. iv. p. 208. Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Ser. 4. Vol. xv. 5 66 Mr. F. P. Pascoe on new Genera remain even in the same subfamily. There are, however, in my opinion cases, as in this, in which a character becomes almost purely arbitrary: in the species before us the ex- ae characters are sufficiently recognized by generic distinction *. Ceroplesis sumptuosa, C. oblonga, nigra, supra pube tenuissima alba parce adspersa, infra nitida, pilis brevibus volitantibus induta; capite inter oculos pro- funde suleato, tuberibus antenniferis alte elevatis ; antennis ( ¢ ) corpore sesquilongioribus, (2) parum longioribus ; prothorace transverse tumido, utrinque in mare subbituberculato, punctis paucis irregulariter adsperso, tomento brunneo-miniato dense tecto; scutello valde transverso, postice rotundato ; elytris pro- thorace plus triplo longioribus, bronzino-nigris, basi rugoso- punetatis, postice punctis sensim minoribus et minus confertis, fasciis duabus determinatis integris invicem atque a basi equaliter distantibus, margineque apicali roseo-miniatis ornatis ; tibiis an- ticis ( ¢ ) longiusculis, apice parum arcuatis. Long. 14-15 lin. Hab. Cape (Grahamstown). From C. tricineta, Ol., the nearest ally, this handsome species differs in the diverging antennary tubers, the trans- verse bulging of the middle of the prothorax, which is covered with a dense maroon or claret-coloured tomentum, the glossy bronze (almost golden) hue of the elytra, except the pinkish or dark rosy bands, and the anterior tibiz of the males longer and less curved. C. marginalis, Fahr., seems to me scarcely distinguishable from C. ferrugator, Fab. I have recently received C, dicincta from Angola, hitherto only recorded from the Cape. Ceroplesis aulica. C. nigra, subtus prothoraceque sparse griseo-pubescentibus ; capite pilis griseis sparsis induto, tuberibus antenniferis divergentibus, * The Munich Catalogue erroneously makes Thysta tricincta, Cast., synonymous with 7. Wailichii, Hope. The errors in this most useful and extensive work (it already reaches to 3478 pages) seem to be fewer than could reasonably have been anticipated; but the authors in some cases seem to have wilfully gone out of their way to create mistakes, as for instance, in referring Pascoéa Ide to Tmesisternus mirabilis, Anthores leuconota to Monohammus asperula, &c. The great defect of the work is the restoration of names that have been dropped in consequence of their being preoccupied elsewhere. Dr. Gemminger and the Baron de Harold have adopted a very narrow rule. So long as names have not been used for a Coleopterous genus, it matters not that they have been used in other orders of insects; but on this principle, carrying it a step further, the specialist in Carabide, for example, would be justified in taking the names of any other family of Coleoptera, and the same generic name might be used in every family of the animal kingdom. and Species of Coleoptera. 67 haud productis ; prothorace modice transverso, utrinque tuberculo fere obsoleto, pone medium munito; elytris cylindricis, fasciis tribus equalibus nigris, quarum una basali, una media, una pre- apicali, apice ipso fasciisque duabus intermediis lete fulvidis ornatis ; pedibus pilis brevibus adspersis. Long. 8 lin. Hab. Angola. A comparatively small and somewhat aberrant species ; it stands in Dejean’s Catalogue under the name here adopted. PsyCHOLUPIS. (Phrynetinz.) Frons convexa ; vertex elevatus, supra antennas excavatus ; clypeus brevissimus, valde transversus, a fronte sulco recto discretus. Oculi maximi, lobo inferiore quadrato, ad oram approximati. An- tenne lineares, breves, articulo basali longiusculo, tertio usque ad quintum gradatim brevioribus, ceteris brevibus eylindricis, Pro- thorax transversus, apice basique equalis, utrinque spina valida armatus. Elytra oblonga, subparallela, modice convexa, basi bi- sinuata, humeris paulo porrectis. Pedes validi, antici breviores ; femora brevia; tibie breviter calcarate; unguiculi divergentes. Prosternum postice in dente acuto productum ; mesosternum apice callosum. The only species of this genus, although well known, does not appear to have been described; but I believe it is some- where mentioned by M. Reiche under the above name. From Pachystola aud other genera it is known by its short, linear, not setaceous antenne, and from the former also by entire intermediate tibie. What I take to be the male has somewhat longer antenne. I have named the only known species after the learned Swede Ol. Im. Fahreus. Psycholupis Fahrei. P. elongatus, fuscus, omnino dense griseo-pubescens, fere obsolete silaceo-maculatus; capite sat magno, inter antennas leviter ex- cavato, antennis 9 corporis dimidio paulo longioribus; prothorace antice transversim flexuoso-sulcato, in medio paulo depresso, tuberculis tribus planatis munito ; scutello subtransverso ; elytris elongatis, parallelis, dimidio basali, regione suturali excepta, sat confertim fortiter punctatis, apicibus sutura leviter productis ; abdomine marginibus segmentorum nitide nigris. Long. 15 lin. Hab, Angola. Hebesecits antsocera. H, robusta, nitide nigra, pube fulvo-grisea sat sparse tecta; capite confertim punctulato, antice oblongo, linea elevata utrinque 5* Gs Mr. F. P. Pascoe on new Geiera munito; antennis(¢) corpore duplo vel fere triplo longioribus, 12-articulatis, articulis sexto et octavo cinereis; prothorace sat valde transyerso, crebre punctulato, spina valida pone medium utrinque armato; elytris sat grosse et modice confertim punctatis, fasciis duabus arcuatis notatis, una ante altera pone medium obsitis; corpore infra interrupte griseo-pubescente ; pedibus parce pilosis, subtiliter pubescentibus. Long. 5-72 lin. Hab. Queensland. The 12-jointed antenne of the male is a character occurrin also in the following species ; and I find it as well in HZ. basalis. It may be noticed that the apical portion is thickened in some individuals, owing to the penultimate joint being of the same size as the one preceding, and both, as well as the last, being closely fringed. In general appearance this species might be taken at the first glance for H. australis; but the transverse face of the latter, without the raised lines at the sides, will readily differentiate it. Hebesecis cristata. H. nitide nigra, pube inequali fulvo-grisea sat sparse tecta; capite rugoso-punctato, antice transverso, linea elevata utrinque munito, tuberibus antenniferis remotis ; antennis ( ¢) corpore plus duplo longioribus, 12-articulatis, articulis sexto, octavo, nono basi, et tribus ultimis cinereis; prothorace modice transyerso, subcrebre punctulato, dorso utrinque calloso, lateraliter fortiter conico- spinoso ; elytris subtrigonatis, sat sparse punctatis, costulis magis elevatis, basi singulorum piloso-cristatis, pone medium fascia nigra notatis ; corpore infra abdomineque lateraliter albido-pilosis ; pedi- bus parce pilosis, subtiliter pubescentibus. Long. 43-53 lin. Hab. Queensland (Gayndah). There is a dark stripe bordered with white externally on each side of the prothorax of one of my specimens; the elytral crest is also black, and the pubescence of a whitish grey ; the amount of ashy colour on the antenne is also vari- able. This species is allied to H. basalis; the latter, inter alia, has the antennary tubers more produced and approximate, and the terminal joints of the antenne nearly as short again. Protorhopala elegans. Pl. VIII. fig. 1. P. testaceo-rufa, pube alba tenuiter sat dense vestita, maculis elytro- "rum exceptis; antennis attenuatis, corpore longioribus, articulis tertio quartoque zequalibus longiusculis, hoc subarcuato; prothorace transyerso, utrinque in medio tuberculo parvo munito; seutello transverso, apice rotundato, dense albo-tomentoso; elytris basi rude punctatis, singulis maculis tribus denudatis nitidis irregu- laribus munitis, sci/. una basali, una media majore, una versus and Species of Coleoptera. 69 apicem sita; corpore infra pedibusque minus pubescentibus. Long. 8 lin. Hab. Madagascar. This is a very distinct species, and may be hereafter con- sidered to be generically distinct from P. sex-notata. Praonetha Dohrnii. P. breviuscula, piceo-fusea, umbrino, postice variegatim albido pubescens ; antennis subannulatis, articulo tertio quam primo vix longiore ; prothorace subtransverso, vage punctato, in medio bi- calloso; scutello transverso ; elytris sat brevibus, utrinque gra- datim angustatis, apicibus rotundatis, vage punctatis, versus apicem subsulcatis, basi et pone medium (fere obsolete) nigro- , cristatis, illa fasciolata; abdomine leviter maculato. Long. 4 lin. Hab, Ceylon. This little ven belongs to my fourth section of the genus (Longic. Malayana, p. 174), characterized by the basal crests and by the gradually declivous posterior portion of the elytra; but it differs from every other species of the section in the presence of two well-marked tubercles on the prothorax. In so large a genus, where the coloration is confined to various shades of brown with obscure or indefinite spots or markings of greyish or whitish (and even in individuals of the same species there is sometimes a considerable modification caused by the predominance of one or the other of these colours), it becomes very difficult to give an accurate idea of the characters in these respects: in the specimen before me there are two or three concentric black and white lines on the posterior half of the elytra, the innermost black line at its commencement anteriorly marking the position of the postmedian crest (or tubercle). I owe my examples to the well-known polyglot resident of the Entomological Society of Stettin, after whom I have named it *. CHA&TOSTIGME. (Niphonine.) Caput in medio longitudinaliter suleatum ; frons convexa. Oculi profunde emarginati. Antenne setacee, corpore longiores, pilis volitantibus adsperse, articulo basali longiusculo, tertio quartoque longioribus, zequalibus, hoc arcuato, ceteris dimidio brevioribus. Prothorax latitudini longitudine equalis, lateribus inermis, basi * Dr. Gerstiicker (‘Die Gliederthier-Fauna des Sansibar-Gebietes,’ p. 261) enumerates P. melanura,a Malayan species, among the insects of Zanzibar. His Phoryctus mucoreus is evidently Enaretta Castelnaudi, Thoms. ; and his Rhopalizus sansabaricus is a Callchroma. 70 Mr. F. P. Pascoe on new Genera bisinuatus. Elytra prothorace duplo longiora, basi latiora, postice gradatim angustiora, humeris rotundata. Pedes mediocres, fere wequales. Pro- et mesosterna inter coxas elevata, haud producta. This genus may be placed near Micracantha, Montr.; but, inter alia, it wants the prothoracic tubercle, and the antenne have a longer basal joint. The outline of the prothorax and elytra is different ; and hence the affinity of the two genera is not at once obvious. ‘The species described below is covered with a whitish pubescence, the elytra having scattered bristle- like hairs, each arising from an areolated puncture. The an- tenne, owing to the disposition of the pubescence, have an annulated appearance. Chetostigme casta. Pl. VIII. fig. 5. C. fusca, pube griseo-alba dense tecta; antennis apice articulorum excepto sparse pubescentibus ; prothorace antice paulo angustiore, utrinque modice rotundato ; scutello transverso, postice rotundato ; elytris disperse punctatis, punctis fusco-marginatis, singulis in medio pilum longiusculum emittentibus ; corpore infra pedibusque minus dense vestitis. Long. 4 lin. Hab, West Australia (Nicol Bay). Corrhenes grisella. C. fulvo-ferruginea, sat rude griseo-pubescens, pilis erectis albidis adspersa ; antennis nigris, basi articulorum, ultimo excepto, al- bidis, articulo primo quam tertio breviore ; prothorace cylindrico, latitudine vix longiore ; elytris angustioribus, parallelis, maculis nudis minutis adspersis; corpore infra pedibusque albido-pubes- centibus; abdomine segmento primo fulvo-marginato. Long. 33 lin. Hab. Australia (Nicol Bay). Much narrower than C. paulla, of a more uniform colour, the antenne with a shorter basal joint, and the elytra finely speckled. Corrhenes fulva. C. valida, ferruginea, omnino dense fulvo-pubescens, supra pedibus- que pilis erectis nigris numerosis adspersa; capite antice valde transverso, vertice elevato ; oculis parvis, antice remotis ; antennis erassiusculis, fuscis, articulo primo quam tertio evidenter breviore ; prothorace modice transyerso, versus apicem leviter constricto ; elytris subtiliter punctatis, maculis saturatioribus adspersis. Long. 5-6 lin. Hab, Australia (Rockhampton). A stouter species than C. paulla, with a proportionally larger head, more transverse anteriorly &c. ; and Species of Coleoptera. 71 Corrhenes cruciata. C. valida, ferruginea, supra pube griseo-fusca dense tecta, pilis minus numerosis subadpressis adspersa ; capite antice transverso ; oculis mediocribus ; antennis ¢ corpore paulo longioribus ; pro- thorace subtransverso, cylindrico, disco vittis duabus indeterminatis munito ; elytris basi paulo latioribus, humeris prominulis, apicibus oblique truncatis, lineis duabus albis vel fulvis a basi usque ad tertiam partem, figura X-formi, ornatis; corpore infra pedibusque minus dense pubescentibus. Long. 6-10 lin. Hab. Queensland. A very distinct species, originally found by Mr. Masters at Gayndah. Symphyletes torquatus. S. fuseus, pube plerumque fulvo-grisea dense tectus, supra maculis fulvis minutis adspersus; capite infra et pone oculos fulvo- pubescente ; antennis ( ¢ ) corpore sesquilongioribus, infra leviter ciliatis ; prothorace latitudine vix longiore, tuberculis laterali- bus distinctis; scutello subscutiformi; elytris sparse granulatis, postice gradatim angustatis, plaga fusca arcuata, in medio fulvo- notata, parte quarta basali ornatis, singulis basi tuberculis spini- formibus circa octoin seriebus duabus—interiore quinque, exteriore tribus—instructis, apice truncatis ; corpore infra pedibusque griseo- pubescentibus, segmentis abdominis pilis fulvis fimbriatis. Long. 9-10 lin. Hab. Queensland (Gayndah). In the male the anterior coxe are armed with a curved spine, as in many other species of this large genus; the female is stouter, and the antenne are not quite so long. This very distinct species may be placed after S. cinnamo- meus. ACHRIOTYPA. (Niphonine.) Caput mediocre, inter antennas latum, excavatum. Oculi subdivisi, grosse granulati, lobo inferiore rotundato. Antenne setacee, articulis quatuor ultimis equalibus. Prothorax cylindricus, late- raliterinermis. Zlytra parallela, prothorace paulo latiora. Pedes perbreves; tarsi articulo ultimo valido. Pro- et mesosterna simplicia. An elongate, cylindrical form, with unusually short legs and slender setaceous antenne with the last joint not hooke or curved at the tip. The pro- and mesosterna are as in Symphyletes, to which genus it may for the present be ap- proximated, in habit approaching such species as S, variolosus and its allies. 72 Mr. F. P. Pascoe on new Genera Achriotypa basalis. A, elongata, subcylindrica, fusca, pube grisea sparse tecta ; elytris sat disperse punctatis, margine exteriore in medio niveis, basi macula nigra notatis, apicibus late emarginatis ; antennis articulis tertio quartoque, hoc apice excepto, niveis; prothorace dense punctulato, margine basali nigro-binotato ; corpore infra castaneo, parce pubescente. Long. 44 lin. Hab. New South Wales (Rope’s Creek). Rhytiphora latifasciata. R. omnino nitide nigra, pube silacea interrupta vestita; capite antice valde transverso, fronte lata, tuberibus antenniferis remotis, vertice elevato, in medio postice sulcato, pube lineatim notato ; prothorace transverso subcylindrico, utrinque tuberculo parvo in- structo, supra pube vermiculatim disposita ; scutello semicireulari ; elytris paulo depressis, singulis lineis tribus obsoletis notatis, fascia lata fulvo-albida submedia, antice arcuata, postice flexuosa, ornatis, apicibus subtruncatis; metasterno ad latera tumido ; tibiis brevibus. Long. 11 lin. Hab. Australia (Cape York). An aberrant species, having a certain resemblance to Huclea capito. Penthea melanosticta. P. omnino dense albido-pubescens, nigro-maculata; capite antice transyerso, tuberivus antenniferis remotis ; antennis ( 2 ) corpore brevioribus, nigris, basi subalbidis; prothorace subtransverso, cylindrico, utrinque dente parvo instructo; scutello semilunari ; elytris basi paulo latioribus, dorso utrinque dimidio anteriore leviter lineatim elevato, apicibus subemarginatis; pedibus yix maculatis. Long. 6 lin. Hab. West Australia (Nicol Bay). This species is allied to P. miliaria, which, with scenica, picta, sectator, and crassicollis, seem to constitute a group some- what different from the ordinary Penthee. Lacordaire (Gen. x. p. 560) says the genus is easily known by two tomentose depressions of the abdomen in both sexes; and in a note he adds, ‘‘ No author that I know of has mentioned this cha- racter.”’ I had, however, previously called attention to it in a species of a closely allied genus, Symphyletes pubiventris (Journ. of Entom. i. p. 339), but in which the two patches were so close together as to cover nearly the whole of the segment. Subsequently I found that this character might or might not exist in the same species, or in either sex ; and it seemed to me so unsatisfactory, that, as a rule, I have ceased to mention if. and Species of Coleoptera. 73 Bebelis picta. B. breviuscula, fusca, griseo-pubescens; antennis crassiusculis, linearibus, longitudine corporis; prothorace subcylindrico, vittis indeterminatis sex, quatuor nigris, duabus lateralibus albis, ornato ; scutello albo-griseo ; elytris brevibus, apicibus subtruncatis, lineis obliquis curvatis basalibus, maculis lateralibus, aliisque apicalibus, albis, nigro-marginatis, ornatis ; corpore infra pedibusque brun- neis, sparse griseo-pubescentibus. Long. 34 lin. Hab. Rio Janeiro. Considerably shorter than B. lignosa, Thoms., and with stouter antenne ; the stripes at the base, black, white, grey, with white and black again, are curved, and with their fellows enclose a heart-shaped space in the region of the scutellum ; the lateral and apical spots have a similar coloration, but much less distinct. Bebelis acuta, Pl. VIII. fig. 6. B. elongata, fusca, griseo-pubescens; antennis setaceis, corpore brevioribus; oculis parvis; prothorace subcylindrico, macula A-formi, externe albo-marginata, basin versus notato; scutello albo-griseo; elytris postice sensim angustioribus, apice extus in spinam dentiformem productis, et ut in precedente fere ornatis, sed lineis basalibus minus obliquis. Long. 43 lin. Hab. Rio Janeiro. In the figure the elytra are represented too much rounded at the sides, and they are not sufficiently elongate. In this genus the eyes are coarsely granulate ; and in the former as well as in the typical species they fairly answer M. Thomson’s designation “‘submagni ;”’ but in this species they are decidedly small, and the connexion of the upper lobe to the lower is in- dicated only by a very long narrow line. I owe all my spe- cimens to Mr. Fry. EXPLANATION OF PLATE VIII. Fig. 1. Protorhopala elegans. Fig. 2. Emenica nigripennis. Fig. 3. Ectinope spinicollis. Fig. 4. Eunithera viduata. Fig. 5. Chetostigme casta. Fig. 6. Bebelis acuta. Fig. 7. Eudianodes Swanzyi. Fig. 8. Elaptus brevicornis. Fig. 9. Miocydus prionoides. Fig. 10. Hind leg of Titurius culcaratus. 74 ~=Rev. T. R. R. Stebbing on the Genus Bathyporeia. X.—On the Genus Bathyporeia. By the Rev. THomas R. R, Steppine, M.A. (Plate III.] To Lindstrém’s original species, ee pilosa, two other species, Robertson’ and pelagica, have been added by Mr. Spence Bate. Of the last, however, he had seen but a single imperfect specimen, and none but dead imperfect speci- mens of the other two. As I have been more fortunate, and have been able to examine perfect and living specimens of these beautiful little creatures, I have no hesitation in re- ducing all three forms to a single species, the original Bathy- poreia pilosa. There can scarcely be a doubt that what has been figured as B. pilosa is the female, that B. pelagica is its male, and that B. Robertsoni is also the male not yet arrived at maturity. I have taken all three forms on, or rather in, the sands at Llanfairfechan. One specimen of the male I took at low tide near Bangor, one of the female at Pwllheli; so that the species is probably to be found all round the coast of North Wales. It burrows in the sand to the depth of half an inch or a little more, and exhibits very great activity in this pro- ceeding. When in water it is equally vivacious, darting about in all directions. The eyes are faceted, red, and in the mature animal large and kidney-shaped, but small and round in the young. The eyes increase by addition to the number of facets—a mode of growth well known in regard to these organs in the Amphi- poda, and only requiring notice here because the eyes are given as round in the figure and description of Bathyporeia Robertsoni. The upper antenne do not supply, as was ge hae a mark of distinction between the form given as B. pelagica and the other two, since in all alike the secondary appendage to the flagellum has one large articulus followed by a very slender small one. They are also alike in other respects, and notably in the shape of the large first joint, which stands boldly out in a line with the head, but forms a considerable angle with the two following joints, very diminutive by comparison, and attached to an excavation some little way from its compressed distal extremity. The lower antenne do undoubtedly differ in the three forms ; and it is upon these organs that most stress has been laid in distinguishing the supposed species. The principal difference, however, is in the length of the flagellum, which is very short Rey. T. R. R. Stebbing on the Genus Bathyporeia. 75 in the figure of B. pilosa, very long in that of B. pelagica, and of intermediate size in that of B. Robertsont. But in the order Amphipoda, as with the facets of the eyes, so with the articuli of the lash of the antenne, an increase takes place with advancing age. This part of the animal will not, there- fore, of itself suffice for the establishment of a specific distinc- tion. Still the figure with the lash of intermediate size has a character not attributed to either of the other forms. The distal end of each articulus of the flagellum is surmounted by an ornament in the shape of an elongated horse-shoe, to which Mr. Stimpson has given the name “‘calceola,” informing Messrs. Bate and Westwood that it is a character of the male sex. In their description of Lystanassa longicornis these authors express the opinion that the “ calceole ” have the power of in- creasing the sense of smell to a more acute degree. In de- scribing Bathyporeia Robertsonit they mention the additional circumstance that in the upper antennz each articulus bears “a short auditory cilium of an oval form.” Fritz Miiller mentions, in his ‘ Facts for Darwin’ (Translation by Dallas, p- 20), that he considers these “ auditory cilia” of the upper antenne to be olfactory organs, fortifying his opinion by the fact of their stronger development in the males than in the females of certain species, as in other cases male animals are not unfrequently guided by the scent in pursuit of the females. Whether Bathyporeia appreciates scent and sound by the lower and upper pairs of antenne respectively or vice versd, or whether to each or either of these purposes it applies both of them or neither, is a question for nice and careful experi- ment. This much, however, is certain, that the “ calceole,” whatever their use may be, were present in those specimens which had the antennz about as long as the animal itself, thus bringing B. pelagica one step nearer to B. Robertsont. Between the short flagellum and the long one the difference is considerable, the former having only some seven or eight articu- lations, while in the latter I counted thirty-two. It should also be stated that on none of the short flagella did I observe the slipper-shaped appendages, although the specimens of this form were considerably more numerous than those of the other two. On the other hand, I took the form that has short antenne with the young upon it, establishing the point that this is a female form, though leaving it an open question whether its mate in all respects resembles it. ‘The young just born had a strong family likeness to their mother. ‘There did not seem to be any long antenne among them; nor were they to be expected. Of the other parts of the animal one description will equally 76 Rey. T. R. R. Stebbing on the Genus Bathyporeia. apply to males and females, adults and juveniles. The legs of the first pair were wanting in all Mr. Spence Bate’s speci-, mens. These are very small and delicate, and, both in living and dead specimens, are cuddled up within the coxe, as if they were too tender and precious for use. The wrist is long, and at its distal end as broad as the hand. The hand is nearly as broad as it is long, diminishing towards the finger, which is short and curved. The legs of the second pair are beautiful objects under a good lens or microscope. ‘The wrist is larger than the hand, but of the same shape. Both are adorned with long plumose hairs; and the hand is fingerless, There is an awkwardness in speaking of hand and wrist as portions of a leg; but one is happy to escape when possible from the repeti- tion of terms like the propodos of a gnathopodos or the ischium of a pereiopodos, and there is a convenience in using accepted and easily intelligible terms which will atone for some linguis- tic improprieties. We proceed, then, to notice that the hands of the third and fourth pairs of legs are long and thin, and have fingers attached to them. These would appear to be very serviceable limbs, to judge by the activity of their move- ments, and also by the position to which they aspire ; for they are constantly thrust forward in advance of the graceful but comparatively inactive second pair of legs; and this forward position they maintain with some obstinacy, even when the animal that owns them is dead. The three following pairs of legs, like the second pair, are destitute of fingers. They are very actively employed in shovelling back the sand when the animal is burrowing into it. In the quiescent state, and after death, the lower joints of the fifth pair are cocked back, and the lower joints of the seventh pair are thrust forward, to such an extent that the three final couples seem almost to have their order of position exactly reversed. The fifth pair has the most curious appear- ance, because the hand and wrist are so slight and spindle- shanked compared with the well-developed joint to which they form an appendage. In this pair the wrist is longer than the hand. In the two following these proportions are reversed. Mr. Spence Bate assigns a long slender finger to the hand of the fifth pair in B. pilosa. As there is no finger at all to this pair in either of his other species, so unusual a difference be- tween species of the same genus would be remarkable; but as my Welsh specimens have none of them any vestige of this finger, it must be concluded that in Mr, Bate’s imperfect spe- cimen the hairs at the extremity of the hand had assumed, as they well might do, the appearance of a finger. It may be remarked that the drawing of the finger in the ‘ British Ses- _—— ” Rey. T. R. R. Stebbing on the Genus Bathyporeia. 77 sile-eyed Crustacea’ might very well represent the coalescing of long hairs or setee. The fourth segment of the tail has a deep transverse sinus, generally very conspicuous, but sometimes, especially after the animal is dead, concealed by the hinder portion of the prece- ding segment. It is no doubt from this casual concealment that the want of a sinus has been attributed to B. pelagica as a specific difference. The form with the long antenne cer- tainly possesses the sinus in question in a manner perfectly well marked. ‘he elevated part of the segment behind the sinus is surmounted by two short sete: and also by two short spines. The hairs stand upright; the spines generally point backwards. The segment is deeply excavated below as well as above. There is a peculiarity worth noticing in the coxa of the first pair of legs. It does not lie parallel to those which follow ‘it, but has a sort of neck at its upper part attached to the hinder part of the segment to which it belongs, the whole of this neck-like portion being completely covered by the coxa of the succeeding segment. The skin of the animal is white and semitransparent. Some nae have the tail part prettily blotched with pink. nder a high power, portions of the skin exhibit markings resembling those common on fish-scales. Other species of this beautiful little genus will be welcome when they are forthcoming; but it has probably been made clear by the foregoing details that a single species of it must content us for the present. That the male should have more fully developed antennz than the female is perhaps rather the rule than the exception among the Amphipoda. It is a little singular that in the same hunting-ground the full-grown male should have been much more rare than the other two forms, of the female and the young; but another afternoon’s research might have altered the proportion of numbers altogether, while it would be extremely peculiar, not to say improbable, that the same stretch of sand should have yielded three different species of one genus, though yielding no other Amphipod, except the very different form of Sulcator arenarius. Since writing the above account I have had the opportunity of searching the sands on the south coast, which stretch for about fourteen miles from Lancing by Worthing and Goring, and on past Littlehampton. In this district also I have taken all the three forms, but those with the long antenne very sparingly— the latter circumstance suggesting the conjecture that the adult males are less littoral in their habits than the females. My search, in company with a friend, was continued almost every 78 Dr. J. Hector on new Species of day for nearly a fortnight; and, unless where here and there weeds and stonesafforded a shelter, these extensive sands yielded no other sessile-eyed Crustaceans except Bathyporeia, Eurydice pulchra, and one — small specimen of Sulcator. ‘This soli- tary specimen we took within the first five minutes, and expected accordingly to meet with the same abundance of the species as in Wales, but, with the most eager and anxious search, during all the rest of the time could never find another in the southern locality. Bathyporeia pilosa, on the other hand, could have been taken in thousands. Its presence beneath the sand is betrayed by a small furrow, sometimes short and nearly straight, ending in a little pit, at others twisting and meandering about and occasionally zigzagged. The mothers with young look as if their bodies were tinted with a delicate blue; but this is due partly to a double stripe upon each ovum, the colouring of which is seen through the pellucid sides of the parent, and partly perhaps to the contents of the alimentary canal. In the sands at Paignton, near Torquay, I have taken in close proximity to one another the sand-furrowers Sulcator arenarius, Kréyera arenaria, Bathyporeia pilosa, and Eurydice pulchra. EXPLANATION OF PLATE III. Fig. 1. Bathyporeia pilosa, not full-grown. Fig. 2. The same, adult male. Fig. 3. Upper antenne. Fig. 4. First gnathopod. Fig. 5. Second gnathopod. Fig. 6. Third pereiopod. Fig. 7. Fourth pereiopod. Fig. 8. Upper portion of fifth pereiopod. XI.—Descriptions of five new Species of Fishes obtained tn the New-Zealand Seas by H.M.S.-‘ Challenger’ Expedition, July 1874. By James Hector, M.D., C.M.Z.S. Trachichthys intermedius, sp. 0. P..16,. V.1] 6 Dey 1.. A310. 1 lage L. transv. 6/10, Caudal 7 | 10 | 6. Bodycompressed. Length of head nearly equal to the height, and contained twice and a half in the length (without caudal, which is equal in length to the head). Pectoral extends behind the vent, being same length as caudal, and has the Fishes from the New-Zealand Seas. 79 fourth lowest ray longest. Ventrals slightly in advance of aeons and reaching to the vent, which is behind the middle. nout rounded, its length being one half the diameter of the orbit. Cleft of mouth very oblique. Maxillaries expanded behind, and twice the diameter of the orbit in length. Teeth in fine villiform bands. Interorbital space equal to the orbit, prismatic, with a lozenge-shaped space on each side separated by a double elevated ridge that terminates in two spines over the nostrils in front, and diverges behind to bound an occipital space. The upper part of the head is formed of a delicate framework and membranes enclosing large cavities. The in- fraorbital area is crossed by seven rays, and the operculum by two vertical ridges with five transverse bars, the lowest being prolonged over the suboperculum and angle on the gill-opening as a roughly serrated spine. Between the occiput and com- mencement of the dorsal is a rough elevated ridge. The a5 ae dorsal rays rest in a groove. The caudal is deeply orked, each lobe of ten soft rays with seven sharp spines above and six below. The dorsal and anal fins end at the same vertical line ; and the interspace to the caudal is equal to half the length of the body. The greatest height is vertical to the commencement of the dorsal. The serrated ventral keel con- sists of ten scales. Colour silvery white, except the tips of the dorsal fin and caudal lobes, which are qaskahed by crowded black spots ; the neck, back, and base of caudal have also a dark shade from the presence of minute spots. The scales above the lateral line are rough and adherent, but below are soft and deciduous. Total length 2°7 inches, height °85. Dredged by the ‘Challenger’ Expedition in 400 fathoms off Cape Farewell. This fish approaches 7’. elongatus, Giinth., of which a single specimen was obtained at the Great Barrier Island; but from its having evidently intermediate characters between that species and 7’. australis, I have distinguished it under the above name. Platystethus abbreviatus, sp. n. B. dir Paige Ne 1|:6,5.D57 | 26... .A.:2, | 26... ; Ls lat80; L. transy. 5. Caudal 3 | 14 | 3. Body compressed; general form rhomboidal, the greatest length being vertical to the second dorsal spine, which is over the anal spine. Length equal to once and two thirds the 80 Dr. J. Hector on new Species of height, the head being two thirds of the height. Length of snout less than the diameter of the orbit, which is half the length of the head. Interorbital space equal to the snout, this being the greatest thickness of the body. ‘The eyes are very high up; and on each orbit is a doubly serrated ridge that ends in a spine that projects forwards and covers the nostril ; the inner branch of the ridge is continued backwards, bound- ing a deep interorbital depression, the outer is continued round the margin of the orbit. The lower jaw slightly projects. The upper jaw is formed of the intermaxillaries, the maxil- laries depending vertically over the angle of the mouth and ending in a spinous process. The inferior edge of the lower jaw is serrate. Infraorbital space scaled, the opercles naked, with all the lower free edges serrate. A strong ridge with eighteen rough scales extends from the isthmus to the ventrals. The groove for the reception of the dorsal is bounded by twenty-six oblique spinous scales, and that for the anal by twenty similar scales, each having four minute spines, the first being the longest. The first dorsal spine is short, the second long, being half the length of the head; ventral spine the same length, the anal spine one third. The second dorsal spine is compressed, with a sharp anterior edge. Soft dorsal does not begin with a spine. The length of the caudal part of the body is equal to the orbital diameter, and has three short pointed spines above and below the base of the caudal, which is rounded. Scales very narrow and rough. Colour silvery, with a black crescent behind the pectoral, which is very small and rounded. There is also a black line along the base of the dorsal and anal, and a patch on the base of the caudal. Teeth very minute. The depressed interorbital space, shorter form, and different number of fin-spines are the chief characters on which this fish is separated from the only other species of the genus, P. cultratus, of which only two specimens are recorded, from Norfolk Island. Dredged by H.M.S.-‘Challenger’ Expedition in 400 fathoms off Cape Farewell. Scorpena barathri, sp. n. B.7. P.18 V.1]5. D.11—1{]10. A.3|5. Muci- ferous pores 22. L. scales 65. LL. transv. 7 | 20. Length equal to thrice and one fourth the height and twice and two thirds the length of head. Teeth on the palatines, vomer, and jaws in fine villiform bands. General form com- | Fishes from the New-Zealand Seas. 81 pressed elongate, with profile of head convex. Length of snout equal to diameter of orbit; maxillary rather longer. Interorbital space equals one third of the same. Supraorbital ridges with five spines. Praeoperculum with five spines in the lower limb; suboperculum with two appressed spines on the upper limb. ‘Third dorsal spine longest, and equal to half the length of the head. Anal spine of the same length, and greater than base of anal fin. The interval between the anal and caudal is twice that between the soft dorsal and caudal. Colour silvery, with a yellow line and a few brown spots on the back, and a dark patch on the dorsal fin. Approaches nearest to S. panda, Rich.; but is distinguished chiefly by the greater length and less height of the dorsal, and shorter pectorals. Dredged by H.M.S.-‘Challenger’ Expedition in 400 fathoms off Cape Farewell. Macrurus armatus, sp. n. Di l1—6545,,, Av tantN 2% Length of head equal to half the length of the body before the anus and contained five times and a half in its total length. Greatest height at first dorsal ray not equal to the length of head. Second dorsal ray as long as the height of body; spinous anteriorly, and enveloped in a sheath that is prolonged as a filament, overreaches only half the distance to the second dorsal, the interspace of the dorsal fin being equal to two thirds the length of the head. Diameter of orbit is one fourth of the length of the head and equal to that of the snout, but exceeds the projection of the snout beyond the mouth by one third. Interorbital space is once and one third of the orbital diameter. First ventral ray is prolonged, and reaches to the vent. Teethinasingle series. Mouth wide, extending across four fifths of the inferior surface of the head. Scales with three feeble spines, the middle spine being granulated on the head- and neck-scales. Colour uniform light grey. Dredged by H.M.S.-‘ Ehalienger’ Expedition in 400 fathoms off Cape Farewell. Pseudorhombus boops, sp. n. B.,5., Do £1 8y » Poli.) V.6....A. 98. :C2 16; LL. lat..80; L. transv. 36. Eyes on left side. Mouth and head otherwise symmetrical. Length equal to twice and a half the height and thrice the Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Ser. 4. Vol. xv. 6 82 Mr. R. Collett on a new Species of Motella. length of the head. Lateral line arched over the pectoral fin, the length of which is one third the height and the same as that of the caudal, which is rounded. Left ventral fin in line with the anal, but not continuous. Length of maxillary is contained twice and two thirds in length of head and two thirds that of snout. Orbits separated by a narrow slightly elevated ridge that overhangs the lower orbit. Dorsal fin commences in front of eye, and one half the orbital diameter from snout. Opercular margin entire, except a shallow notch in front of pectoral. Preeopercular limbs join at right angles. Cleft of mouth oblique; maxillaries extending to the anterior vertical of the uppereye. Every part covered with scales, the diameter of which is one third that of the profile, with the free margins ciliate. Teeth in a single row, on both jaws in equal number, there being six on each side above and below; none on the vomer. Lower jaw with a prominent gonyx. Colour yellowish white above, white beneath. Differs from P. scaphus, Forst., to which it is closely related, in the number of rays, and in the greater relative size of the head, and the strikingly large orbits. Dredged by H.M.S.-‘ Challenger’ Expedition in 400 fathoms off Cape Farewell. XII.—On a new Motella from Norway. By Ropert Cou.ert. Motella septentrionalis, n. sp. 2. D. 50-51. A. 41-43. P.15-16. V.7. C. 28-30. Body rather short; head large, depressed, contained four times in the total length (including caudal). Snout obtuse, with one barbel at each of the nostrils, and a row of eight shorter or rudimentary ones along the upper lip, one at the chin. Upper jaw considerably longer than the inferior. The maxillary extends far behind the posterior margin of the orbit (the central point of iris is rather nearer the extremity of the snout than the end of the maxillary). Teeth cardiform and of unequal size. The eyes are rather small and directed upwards ; the orbit is contained seven times and a half in the length of the head (in younger individuals six times). First dorsal short, its first ray short, only twice as long as the orbit. The vent is situated in the middle between the extremity of the snout and the end of the anal. The lateral line for the most part conspicuous, consisting of about eighteen large pores. Miscellaneous. 83 Coloration brown, without traces of spots. The total length of the largest examined specimen 170 millims. I possess two specimens from the western and northern coasts of Norway, both brought up in a dredge by Prof. G. O. Sars searching for sea animals. The larger specimen (total length 170 millims.) was taken at Floré, on the Bergen coast, in 1873; the other is a younger individual (total length 100 millims.), and taken from a depth of 30 fathoms at Bodé, north of the Arctic Circle (lat. 67° 15! N.), in 1874. Christiania, November 10, 1874. MISCELLANEOUS. On the Embryogeny of the Rhizocephala. To the Editors of the Annals and Magazine of Natural History. GentLeMEN,—In your Journal for November 1874, p. 383, M. Giard imputes an error to me of which I am not guilty. He says :—‘An error similar to that of M. Gerbe has been made by Professor Semper, who describes as furnishing a larva of a very peculiar form a Peltogaster of the Philippine Islands, of which he has evidently observed the embryos only after the first moults, when they already affected the Cypridine form.” I trust you will be so kind as to allow me to offer some remarks on this matter. Having observed the Cypridine larva of a Peltogaster in the Pelews already in 1861, and having sent my few remarks on them to the editor of the ‘ Zeitschr. fiir wiss. Zool.’ in 1862, which ap- peared in 1863, I was evidently unable to know that F. Miiller would describe in the year 1863 (Arch. f. Naturgesch. xxix. Febr.) the second larva of the Suctoria: at that period only the first of them, the Nauplius-form, was known. I was thoroughly justified, therefore, in designating a larva diverging from the only known ones as being peculiar ; I might then have called it rightly very peculiar, although I have not done so. It was peculiar not only for its un- known form, but also for its two eyes, whilst the larve of Rhizo- cephala till then known had only a single one. M. Giard imputes to me an error on the ground of his belief that all Rhizocephala must have a Nauplius-larva as the first larval stage. But this is only a dogma. M. Giard has not examined the species discovered by me in the Pacific; he has therefore no formal right to impute to mea mistake in my observations. In the totally closed sac of the mother only such Cypridine larve were found, no Nauplius- lary or empty skins which I might have ascribed to such. Why, then, should not here, as is the case with so many other crustaceans, 6* 84 Miscellaneous. the development of one species have been shortened? M. Giard communicates no observations which might prove the impossibility of such a shortening of the development. Consequently I maintain my view that the species described since by Dr. Russmann under the name of Z’hompsonia globosa (Verhandl. d. phys.-med. Gesellsch. zu Wiirzburg, 1872, oder Arbeiten aus dem zoologisch-zootomischen Institut zu Wiirzburg, Band i. p. 131), after my drawings and spe- cimens, has larvee which leave the egg only in the Cypridine form. There is even no stringent reason to take it for granted, as M. Giard not very judiciously seems to do, that they undergo a conspicuous change of form within the egg, although this, of course, remains to be ascertained. Yours very truly, Wiirzburg, November 20, 1874. Prof. C. Semper. On the Circulatory Apparatus of the Echinida. By M. E. Prrrtrer. The circulatory apparatus of the Sea-Urchins has been the subject of numerous investigations, which are summarized in Valentin’s monograph on Echinus lividus, and more recently in the fine mono- graph of the Echinida by Mr. Alexander Agassiz. These various researches have left very doubtful even the most important points in the arrangement of the vascular apparatus. We can regard as certain only these two facts :—1. The existence of an intestinal vascular appa- ratus. 2. The existence of a system of vessels communicating with the ambulacral canals, and usually designated by the name of the aquiferous apparatus. We did not even know whether these two systems of vessels were distinct, or whether they communicated with each other. This communication, imperfectly seen by Louis Agassiz, and since sought in vain by many anatomists, has only been met with again quite recently by Hoffmann in the Spatangi and Towopneustes, be- longing to the regular Echinida. But there were still many ques- tions to be solved :—The mode of vascularization of the test indicated by some authors seemed very doubtful. The structure of the heart, or at least of the organ so called by anatomists, remained very obscure ; moreoyer there was occasion, in the presence of contradic- tory statements, to verify the announced results, to group and coordi- nate, and finally to present a complete and homogeneous description of the circulatory apparatus of the Echinida. This is the problem which I have endeavoured to solve during a stay of several weeks at the laboratory of experimental zoology of M. de Lacaze-Duthiers at Roscoff (Finisterre). The dredging-operations instituted by M. de Lacaze-Duthiers at his laboratory brought in every day with certainty a great number of specimens of Echinus sphera, which, in consequence of their con- siderable size, were particularly well adapted for my investigations, the results of which may be summarized as follows :— Beneath the madreporic plate a canal (the sand-canal) originates, which descends vertically towards the lantern, passing along the ceso- phagustotheleftand behind. This vessel and the esophagus are united by a mesenteric lamina which embraces the organ hitherto known Miscellaneous. 85 as the heart, to which the vertical canal is intimately united, but without having any relations to it except those of contiguity. The organ in question ts therefore not a heart, as has hitherto been believed ; and we shall recur immediately to its structure. Having arrived at the point where the cesophagus penetrates into the lantern, the vertical vessel opens into a circular vessel resting on the superior membra- nous floor of the lantern and bearing opposite to each of the pyramids a small racemiform gland (Poli’s glands). This, whatever may have been said, is the only vascular ring presented by the circulatory ap- paratus of the Echinida ; at least I have found it impossible to discover any other. From this ring, opposite to the intervals of the pyramids and consequently alternating with Poli’s glands, spring five radiating vessels which pass beneath the calcareous piece known as the fala, and become widened so as to occupy the whole width of the interior surface of this piece. Arriving at the outer margin of the lantern these radiating canals resume their original calibre and run along the outer surface of the lantern, from which, however, they finally separate, so that each of them may become continuous with one of the five ambulacral canals. The latter are produced a little towards the mouth beyond their point of junction with the five vertical canals; it is this, no doubt, that has led to the belief in the existence of a vas- cularring applied tothe buccal membrane within the lantern; but this ring has no existence: the prolongations of the ambulacral canals soon bifurcate ; and each of their branches penetrates into one of the two large buccal tentacles. The ambulacral canals ascend along the test, and terminate cacally below the pore presented by the so-called ocular plates, although these do not contain any organ of vision. In Echinus sphera this pore is closed by a continuous membrane, and does not give passage to any thing resembling an unpaired tentacle. Although one can inject the whole circulatory apparatus by applying to one of these pores the pipe of a syringe, there is not init any direct communi- cation between the vascular apparatus and the exterior; the injec- tion only penetrates in consequence of a lesion. There is no anal ring uniting the five ambulacral vessels. Each canal is the seat of a double current maintained by the vibratile cilia which clothe its interior; it serves at once for the flow and the return of the san- guine liquid which it contains, as I have been able to ascertain by direct observation. The arrangement of the ambulacral vessels of the Echinida therefore exactly reproduces that which I have already described in the Comatule. Immediately opposite to the right upper Poli’s gland there springs from the circular vessel of the lantern a vascular branch which ascends along the cesophagus, and forms, to a certain extent, a pen- dant to the vertical canal which originates from the madreporic plate and opens at the left posterior Poli’s gland. Having reached the point where the cesophagus opens into the intestine, this canal becomes reflexed and considerably widened, and constitutes the great vessel which follows the inner margin of the intestine, and beyond which the mesenteric plate is slightly prolonged. There is con- 86 Miscellaneous. sequently a real communication between the intestinal vascular apparatus and the supposed aquiferous apparatus. The inner vessel is separated from the intestine proper by the singular canal which I propose to name the intestinal siphon, which, originating from the upper extremity of the cesophagus, runs to open into the intestine a little before its point of reflexion, and which, according to certain observations, would seem to be destined for the rapid conveyance of sea-water into the second bend of the intestine. Beyond the point where this canal opens into the intestine, the vessel which ac- companies it widens into a great reservoir, from which issue numerous vascular branches passing to the intestine. This reservoir is produced a little upon the reflected part of the mesentery; but it soon diminishes in volume, and becomes very rapidly resolved into a network of capillaries, which may be traced for a considerable distance upon the mesentery; the inner vessel therefore is not prolonged as a distinct vessel upon the second bend of the intestine. All along its course the vessel which has just been described emits numerous branches which pass to the intestine and constitute the afferent branches of a very rich and elegant capillary network, the efferent branches of which pass to a trunk passing along the outer margin of the intestine, the external marginal trunk. This trunk is continued into the mesenteric plate; we have never seen it emitting even the smallest branch passing to the test. We do not see what return course could be taken by the blood which might get into these branches; and it is evident that the external and internal marginal vessels constitute the two principal trunks of an isolated intestinal vascular system, completed by the capillary network. This circle being thus closed there can be no question of branches opening towards the test, unless it be possible to close it again. The external marginal vessel is prolonged further upon the second bend than the internal vessel; but it also diminishes very rapidly and does not reach the anus. I have not been able to follow it to the ring of the lantern; the injection is always arrested at the origin of the cesophagus. Moreover, if this vessel were prolonged as far as the lantern, it would necessarily terminate at the same point as the vertical canal, which is not very probable. In its festooned course along the first bend this vessel splits so as to form a thick, nearly circular trunk, which communicates with it by its two ends, one situated close to the stomach, the other close to the point of reflexion of the intestine. Six vertical branches, at nearly equal distances apart, also make a communication between the marginal vessel and this circular vessel, which floats freely in the liquid of the general cavity, and enjoys, like the marginal vessels, a very marked contractility, although this did not appear to be rhythmical. The histological investigation of the supposed heart showed that this organ was nothing but a true gland, the product of which is poured into a tubular cavity situated below the vertical canal starting from the madreporic plate. This cavity is prolonged into an excretory duct, opening also at the infundibuliform space enclosed Miscellaneous. 87 between the membrane of the test and the madreporic plate. Other tubular glands, situated on the opposite side of the csophagus, in the thickness of the mesentery itself, open in part with this ex- cretory duct, and in part directly beneath the madreporic plate, the pores of which probably give issue to the secreted liquid. It is to be observed that, by the intermediation of the infundibnliform space situated below the madreporic plate, the circulatory apparatus and this glandular apparatus communicate with each other, so that an injection driven through the supposed heart may descend again through the sand-canal. In the Spatangidee (Amphidetus), which have been said to have no trace of a heart, Ihave found a gland exactly similar to that which hitherto has been regarded as the heart in the Echinida. Lastly, I have ascertained, by varied experiments, that the water which fills the cavity of the test of the sea-urchins can only pene- trate them slowly and by endosmose, either through the buccal membrane or through the ambulacral tubes. When sea-urchins have lived for some time in sea-water coloured with aniline, we very regularly find the entire cesophagus and the siphon by which it communicates with the point of reflexion of the intestine coloured red. There has consequently been an introduction of water into the intestine by this course, and a possible passage of a part of this water into the general cavity through the walls of the digestive tube. —Comptes Rendus, November 16, 1874, tome lxxix. pp. 1128-1182. Embryology of the Ctenophora. By AtexanpEr AGasstz. The question of the systematic position of the Ctenophora can now, thanks to the greater knowledge we have of their embryology, be treated more intelligently. The position taken by Vogt, who follows Quoy in removing them from the Acalephs altogether, and associating them with the Mollusks on account of the apparent bilaterality so strongly developed in some families (Cestum, Bolina, and Mertensia), seems not untenable. The nature of their relations to Echinoderms, Polyps, and Acalephs, as well as the general rela- tions of the Celenterata to Echinoderms, may be discussed again, especially as having an important bearing not only on the value of the Coelenterata as a primary division of the animal kingdom, but also on the limits of the Radiata, and the possible affinities of the Sponges and Ceelenterata suggested by Hiickel*. A still more im- portant point developed from this embryology is its connexion with the Gastrea theory of Hickelt, for which he claims that it will supplant the type theory, and give us in its place a new system based upon the homology of the embryonic layers and of the primi- tive digestive cavity. Hiickel attempts, in his Gastrea theory, to find an explanation for the natural development of species from a purely mechanical cause, and has been bold enough not only to * E. Hackel, ‘ Die Kalkschwamme,’ Berlin, 1872. + E. Hackel, “‘ Die Gastrea-Theorie,” Jenaische Zeitschrift, ix. 1874. tate) Miscellaneous. name, but also figure, the primitive ancestor from which all types of the animal kingdom have been developed! This unknown an- cestor, he says, must have been built much like his Gastrula (only another name for what has long been known to all students of In- vertebrates as the Planula of Dalyell). Hiickel would lead us to believe that this Gastrula is a newly discovered embryonic stage ; all he has done in reference to it is to recall the existence of Planule among Sponges, which had previously been discovered by N. Miklucho-Maclay*. Since the publication of Hiickel’s article, his special interpretation of fanciful affinities and homologies existing only in forms conjured up by Hickel’s vivid imagination, have been sufficiently criticised by Metschnikofft ; so that until we know some- thing more of the development of Sponges we may leave the discus- sion of their affinities with Coelenterates out of the question, in spite of the ingenious arguments advanced to support Leuckart’s views on the subject. The existence of Planule, the walls of which consist of an ecto- derm and entoderm, has been distinctly proved for Acalephs, Echi- noderms, Polyps, Worms, Arthropods, Tunicates, Molluskst, and finally for Amphiovus; the papers of Johannes Miiller, Krohn, Agassiz, Kowalevsky, Sars, Allman, Claparéde, Kupfer, Metschni- koff, and others are too well known to need citation in this connexion. So far we are in perfect accordance with Hiickel and cordially agree with him in his estimate of the systematic value of this early embry- onic stage, whether we call it Planula or adopt his latter name of Gastrula. But let us follow his subsequent steps and separate what is known from what is stated as known by Hiickel. It is known that the Planula consists of an entoderm and of an ectoderm. It is known that the primitive digestive cavity is, in the case of Echino- derms, of Ctenophora, and of some Discophora, formed by the turn- ing-in of the ectoderm, so that the wall of this primitive cavity is, in their case at least, invariably formed by the ectoderm. It is known, on the other hand, that in Actiniz, in Worms, in Hydroids§ this primitive digestive cavity is hollowed out of the inner yolk mass of the embryo, and has its walls formed by the entoderm. We must lay great stress on this point, which is alluded to by Hickel as of no consequence}! ; for this seems to us to destroy the very base of his argument. If the Gastrula can in one case, and in such closely allied classes as Actinie and Hydroids on one side, and Echino- derms and Ctenophora on the other, be built so differently that in the first case the walls of the primitive cavity are formed by the entoderm, and in the other of the ectoderm, what becomes of all * N. Miklucho-Maclay, Jen. Zeitschrift, iv. 1868. + E. Metschnikoff, “ Zur Entwickelungsgeschichte d. Kalkschwimme,” Zeits. f. wiss. Zool. xxiv. 1874. } E. R. Lankester, ‘“ On the Primitive Cell-layers of the Embryo,” Ann. Mag. N. H. May 1873. § H. Fol, ‘“ Die erste Entwickelung d. Geryonideneies,”’ Jen. Zeitsch. vii. p. 471. } Mickel and Lankester both seem to think that because the result is a similar form it must be homologous, Misceltaneous. 89 his subsequent generalizations of the value for systematic purposes of these two layers? The distinction of entoderm and ectoderm is, as Hiickel himself acknowledges, and as is sufficiently shown by Kowalevsky, of the greatest anatomical value ; yet how is it possible that these differently constructed Planule@ should have the genetic connexion claimed for them by Hiickel, if in their very embryonic stages the differences are of so radical a nature that, according to the very theory of embryonic layers so strongly insisted upon by Hickel, they could have no possible relation, the one being a product of the entoderm, the other of the ectoderm, the two primitive em- bryonic layers ? It is not known, as is stated by Hiickel, that the walls of the primitive digestive cavity are invariably formed of the entoderm ; and when Hiickel states the result (the Gastrula) to be the same whether formed by the ectoderm or entoderm, he states what is known to be exactly the contrary. It is not known, as is stated by Hickel, that the mere fact of a Planula fixing itself by one extremity or not, will in one case lead to a radical type, in another to a bilateral type. What becomes of all the free-swimming embryos of Echi- noderms, of Acalephs, of Polyps? Are they bilateral? It is true Hiickel is obliged, to suit his theory, to consider the Echinoderms as an aggregation of individuals ; but he has not the countenance of a single zoologist whose opinion on Echinoderms is of any value. When he says that Sars, whose knowledge of the development of Echinoderms was so accurate, agreed with his peculiar views, we can only reply that his agreement must be based upon a misunder- standing. We have equally as many radial and bilateral types developed either from fixed or from pelagic Gastrule ; and to cite this as a causa efficiens, the mechanical reason of the genetic descent of all radiates from a fixed Gastrula, and of all bilateral types from a free-swimming one, is simply fantastic. How is it that so many Actiniz and Acalephs have their radiate structure developed long before they become fixed? It is not known that the embryonic layers of Acalephs are truly homologous to those of the higher Vertebrates. Huxley simply speaks of their bearing the same physio- logical relation to one another ; but until we know the Gastrula of other Vertebrates than Amphioawus it is idle to talk of the continuity existing between the ontogeny of Amphioxus and the remaining members of the Vertebrate branch, and to say that hence there is no doubt left that the ancestors of the Vertebrates must, in the beginning of their development, have passed through the Gastrula form! Neither Hiickel nor any one else has seen this; it is a pretty hint which may or may not be proved. Considerable confusion arises in Hiickel’s classification from his adopting at one time as of primary importance the development of the cavity of the body and making it the main point in his phylo- genetic classification, while previously the relations of the phylum to Protascus and Prothelmis (names he gives to the unknown ances- tors of the radial and bilateral types) formed the basis of his classi- fication. This places him in the awkward predicament of having a phylum of the animal kingdom (the radial) which has Jost the 90 Miscellaneous. capacity of forming a body-cavity, and yet its descendants have in some unaccountable mauner (entirely against the rules of Hiickel’s theory) managed to get one by some unexplained method. We do not see how it can be so confidently stated by Hiickel that Echi- noderms have lost their original central nervous organ ; there is no proof whatever of its once having existed. ‘lhere is as yet no proof whatever that the organs of sense (which, as had already been so often insisted upon by Agassiz, are not homologous in the different branches of the animal kingdom) have the same phylogenetic origin. When Hiickel says that the mouth of Echinoderms is not homolo- gous to the primitive mouth, we can only refer him to the memoirs of Miller, Metschnikoff, and myself on Echinoderm embryos for proof to the contrary. There seems no doubt, as Hiickel insists, that to the majority of zoologists of the present day the idea of type is a very different one from that of type as understood by Baer and Cuvier. The probability of their original community of origin is hinted at from the many so-called intermediate forms, both living and fossil, which, though we may enroll them either in one great branch of the animal kingdom or another, yet show that we can no longer consider the great types of the animal kingdom as closed cycles, but must here- after regard them as holding to one another relations similar to those which the remaining categories of our systems have to one another. This change has principally been brought about by a better know- ledge of the embryology of a few well-known types. But what becomes of all the assumptions of Hackel which form the basis of his Gastraa theory? They are totally unsupported ; and with their refutation must fall his theory; it can only take its place by the side of other physiophilosophical systems ; they are ingenious arrangements laboriously built up in the interests of special theories, which fall to the ground the moment we test them by our actual knowledge. That the time has not yet come for embryolo- gical classifications, the attempts of Hiickel plainly show ; for they are in no wise in advance of the other embryological classifications which have preceded them: we get new names for somewhat differ- ent combinations ; but a truly scientific basis for a classification based upon the value of embryonic layers is at present impossible ; such attempts can be only speculations, to be proved or disproved on the morrow. What Hackel substitutes in the place of the accepted types of the animal kingdom is simply another view of these same types; and his Gastrea theory is in no danger of upsetting, at present at least, zoological classification as now understood. Indeed, if we need an ancestor for our phylum, why not at once go back to the cell? There we have a definite starting-point, a typical element which underlies the whole of the animal kingdom, and which forms the walls of Hiickel’s Gastrula. Then we shall all be agreed; and when we frankly state that all organisms are derived from a pri- mitive cell and from its subsequent increase, we come within the range of positive knowledge, but we are unfortunately as far as ever from having for that reason been able to trace a mechanical Miscellaneous. 91 cause for the genetic connexion of the various branches of the animal kingdom. We must meet the direct issue raised by Hiickel (that such a genetic connexion either does or does not exist) by repeating what has so often been said by others :—This genetic connexion may exist; but we have at present no proof that it does exist. And, at any rate, his Gastrea theory does not bring us any nearer to a mechanical explanation of such a genetic con- nexion, however probable it may be. . . . . Here we must call attention to a marked difference between Acalephs and Polyps on one side, and Echinoderms on the other— that while in the former the connexion between the digestive cavity and the water-system always remains open, it is at one time disconnected in the Echinoderms, though it is eventually reopened through anastomoses of the water-tubes. The anal opening holds in Ctenophora very much the same relation which it holds in Echinoderm larve, in which the water-tubes are still connected with the primitive digestive cavity. When we find, as we do, that in Ctenophora, as well as in Echinoderms, the primitive diges- tive cavity is formed by the inturning of the ectoderm, that in both classes the water-system is developed as diverticula from this digestive cavity, we fail to see how we can separate the Cteno- phora from Echinoderms and place them with Polyps in a separate subkingdom of the animal kingdom. No one questions the rela- tionship of Ctenophora to Acalephs ; yet from embryological data it would be more natural to associate Echinoderms and Ctenophora into one subkingdom, characterized by the mode of formation of the water-system as diverticula forming eventually chymiferous tubes in both classes, and to associate the other Acalephs with the Polyps*, where the chymiferous tubes and cavities are formed by the liquefaction of the interior of the Planula. Any one who will compare the figures of the embryos of starfishes (A. Agassiz, Em- bryol. Starfish, pl. ii. fig. 8) and Ctenophora (pl. ii. figs. 6-10, pl. v. figs. 5, 11) at the time when the chymiferous tubes are reduced to mere diverticula, cannot fail to feel satisfied of their complete identity of plan. Metschnikoff has made, in addition to the homologies I have just recalled, a most interesting comparison between an Echinoderm larva and a Ctenophore; he shows that, even in the adult Ctenophore, the identity of plan is not destroyed, and is carried out to the smallest details: The only point in which I would differ from him is in his comparison of the abactinal ceeliac openings to the actinostome: he seems to forget that in Echino- derm larve what at first performed the part of anus and mouth eventually becomes the mouth alone; so that his figures should be reversed, and then the identity will be found complete between an Echinoderm larva (see A. Agassiz, Embryol. Starfish, pl. iii. fig. 6, and pl. vii. fig. 8) with its ceesophagus, digestive cavity, ali- mentary canal and its chymiferous pouch (water-system), from which run the diverticula eventually to become the water-tubes, * See Allman’s views on the position of the Ctenophora as contrasted with the Actinozoa, Trans. R. 8. Edinb. xxvi. pt. ii. p. 466, 1871. 92 Miscellaneous. and a Ctenophore (pl. iii. fig. 25) with its lateral tubes on the sides of the digestive cavity (g), leading into the chymiferous pouches (w), branching into the chymiferous tube. The cceliac openings (pl. iii. fig. 45, ca) of the funnel*he looks upon as repre- senting the madreporie body, while I look upon them as the anal openings. In this view of the case, the Ctenophore is rather more in the embryonic condition of the Echinoderm larva, when the actinostome leading into the digestive cavity should perform at the same time the function of mouth and anus, which it occasionally does, although at other times the coeliac opening of the funnel seems to be the true anal opening, while, according to Metschnikoff, it is the madreporic body which performs the part of an anal opening. He says it only acts to introduce water into the system, which is contrary to my observations. I may here recall former statements* concerning the affinities of the Ctenophora, when describing some of the younger stages. It could only be after a careful comparison of Ctenophorous and Echinoderm embryos that undoubted evidence of their identity of plan might be obtained. The Ctenophora retain the permanently embryonic features of Echinoderm embryos, in which the water- system is still connected with the digestive cavity. The formation of a funnel as a sort of alimentary canal, opening externally through the coeliac apertures at the abactinal pole, corresponds to the exist- ence of a short alimentary canal in Echinoderm larve. The Cteno- phora are, from their embryology, more closely related to the Echino- derms than to the other Acalephs; and it seems natural to separate the Acalephs into two orders—the Ctenophora, characterized by the presence of locomotive flappers, and the Meduside, including the Discophora and Hydroids.—From the Memoirs of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, vol. x. no. i., August 1874. Notice of Papers on Embryology by A, Kowalevsky. By A. AGAssiz, A. Kowalevsky has published, unfortunately in Russian, two capital papers on embryology. The one continues the investigations he had been carrying on regarding the existence of an ectoderm and entoderm layer in the early embryonic stages of Invertebrates. In the present paper he has given a summary of the early stages of a Campanularia, confirming the observations of Wright and A. Agassiz. For Rhizostoma and Cassiopea he shows that the digestive cavity is formed by the invagination of the ectoderm. This is contrary to the results of previous observers, except Schneider, For Pelagia he shows a direct development from the egg remarkably similar to that of the Geryonide as we know it from Hickel, Fol, and Metsch- nikoff. He adds nothing to the embryology of Actinia not already known from the magnificent monograph of Lacaze-Duthiers. He then passes on to the development of Alcyonium, of which he gives an extremely interesting sketch supplemented by fragments on the embryology of Astrea, Gorgonia, and Cerianthus: the deve- lopment of the latter is strikingly similar to that of Hdwardsia, as we know it during its passage from Arachnactis to Edwardsia. He * Alexander Agassiz, Il]. Cat. M.C.Z. no, 2, p. 12, 1865, Miscellaneous. 93 has added a few observations on the earlier embryonic stages of Eschscholtzia, Beroé, and Eucharis, completing deficiencies in his earlier papers on the embryology of Ctenophora. These supple- mentary observations agree completely with the observations of A. Agassiz on the embryology of Ctenophora. The second memoir is a very complete history of the development of Brachiopods, strikingly in accordance with the views of Steenstrup and of Morse on the affinities of Brachiopods with Annelids. The homology between the early embryonic stages of Argiope and well- known Annelid larve is most remarkable; and the resemblance between some of the stages of Argiope figured by Kowalevsky and the corresponding stages of growth of the so-called Lovén type of development among Annelids is complete. The number of segments is less ; but otherwise the main structural features show a closeness of agreement which will make it difficult for conchologists hereafter to claim Brachiopods as their special property. The identity in the ulterior mode of growth between the embryo of Argiope and of Balanoglossus in the Tornaria-stage is still more striking: we can follow the changes undergone by Argiope while it passes through its Tornaria-stage (if we may so call it) and becomes gradually, by a mere modification of the topography of its organs, transformed into a minute pedunculated Brachiopod differing as far from the Tornaria- stage of Argiope as the young Balanoglossus differs from the free- swimming Jornaria. In fact, the whole development of Argiope is a remarkable combination of the Lovén and of the Tornaria types of development among Worms. His paper also includes the history of a less vermiform type of development, that of Thecidium and of Terebratula, in which the observations of Kowalevsky fully agree with the previous well-known memoir of Lacaze-Duthiers on Thecidium, and of Morse on Terebratulina. It is not out of place to recall the very ungenerous treatment which Morse received at the hands of many conchologists for the heresies of his papers on the systematic position of Brachiopoda; and it certainly is a striking proof of the sagacity of Morse, to have announced so posi- tively, from the history of the American Brachiopods alone, the vermiform affinities of Brachiopods, now so conclusively proved by the development of Argiope in Kowalevsky’s paper. The close relationship between Brachiopods and Bryozoa cannot be more fully demonstrated than by the beautiful drawings on pl. y. of Kowalevsky’s history of T'hecidium. We shall now have at least a rational explanation of the homologies of Brachiopods, and the transition from such types as Pedicellina to Membrani- pora and other incrusting Bryozoa is readily explained from the embryology of Thecidium. In fact, all incrusting Bryozoa are only communities of Brachiopods the valves of which are continuous and soldered together, the flat valve forming a united floor, while the convex valve does not cover the ventral valve, but leaves an open- ing more or less ornamented for the extension of the lophophore*. —Silliman’s American Journal, Dec. 1874. * Mr. B. P. Mann translated for me the explanation of the plates of the two memoirs of Kowaleyslcy. 94 Miscellaneous. On the Relationship of the Vertebrata and Annelida. By C. Semper. It is well known that the Ascidia are regarded with Kupfer and Kowalevsky as the nearest relatives of the Vertebrata ; and this opinion is supported by the analogous mode of production of the nerve-cord and the presence of a chorda between it and the intes- tine in both groups of animals. But it is forgotten that the Verte- brata are segmented animals, while the Ascidia are not so: the sole indication of a segmentation in the latter appears to lie in the oc- currence of spinal nerves in the tail and hinder part of the body of the larva of Ascidia mentula, as affirmed by Kupfer. This gap is now filled in a most unexpected manner by the dis- covery of segmental organs in Selachian embryos. In Acanthias, Centrina, and Scyllium I have found funnel-shaped openings leading into ciliated ducts in connexion with the primitive kidneys ; they are placed, one pair in each segment (metamere), right and left of the mesentery, along the whole of the body-cavity. They are pro- duced by depression of the peritoneal epithelium, and are only secondarily connected with the lateral canals of the primitive renal duct, which also issue segmentally. The funnels in Acanthias are very large ; and their cilia vibrate strongly. In Centrina and Acan- thias they may be detected by the lens even in nearly mature em- bryos; in Scyllium, on the contrary, they disappear very early. In Acanthias the ovary is developed without any participation of the segmental organs; but in the male the seminal duct seems to become developed by a peculiar process of budding and amalga- mation of the segmental funnels. Except in a single point, the comparison to the segmental organ of an annelide may be completely carried out. In the one, as in the other, they are repeated in pairs in the segments of the body: they have a ciliated funnel opening freely into the cavity of the body ; the ciliated duct springing from this leads into a glandular segment (in the Vertebrates to the Malpighian body or primitive kidney) ; they are in intimate relation with the genital organs; and, lastly, they are produced in their glandular and infundibular portion from the mesoderm. The sole distinction consists in the mode of opening of these excretory organs: in the Annelida each seg- mental organ opens separately in the corresponding segment of the body ; in the Vertebrata they unite with the primitive renal duet, which in the Selachia, as in the Teleostea, is a product of the peri- toneal epithelium. This contradiction cannot, however, be used as an argument against the comparison of the two sets of organs, as the union of the glandular part with the efferent ducts is in both cases produced secondarily by the coalescence of the original separate rudiments; moreover the so-called aquiferous vessels of the Rota- toria are universally compared to the segmental organs of the Vermes, although in the former, just as in the Vertebrata, two effer- ent ducts opening into the cloaca take up the secretion of the glands, which open by several funnels into the body-cavity. It might appear that a statement of Gegenbaur’s is to be referred Miscellaneous. 95 to these segmental organs. In his so-called ‘Comparative Anatomy’ he speaks of the possibility of a comparison of the oviducts and tube to the segmental organs of the Vermes. This is completely refuted by the observations here given: the true segmental organs of the Vertebrata (hitherto detected only in the Selachia) have nothing to do with the tub and the oviduct ; the former originates from the primitive renal duct, and the latter is produced by a fold which finally leads to the formation of a tube; the tubs are only the permanently open orifices of the primitive renal groove, and they consequently originate in quite a different manner from the true segmental funnels. The comparison here made leads to far-reaching consequences. Assuming it to be correct, it follows that the Annelida are more nearly allied than the Ascidia to the Selachia, and therefore also to the Vertebrata in general (with the exception of Amphiowus). It might be objected that the spinal cord and the chorda are of more importance for the recognition of relationship than the primitive kidney and the segmentation of the body, so that the Ascidia are more nearly allied than the Vermes to the Vertebrata. But this objection is partly refuted by the circumstance that according to Kowalevsky’s investigations the ventral cord of the Vermes and Insecta is formed in a perfectly analogous manner to the dorsal cord of the Vertebrata. The chorda alone seems to offer any difficulty ; but it is still questionable whether the chorda of the Ascidia is really to be compared so unconditionally to that of the Verte- brata; and, on the other hand, Kowalevsky, in his ‘ Embryological Researches on Worms and Insects,’ even indicated as a chorda a fibrous cord discovered by Leydig in the earthworm and detected by Claparéde in numerous worms, and which in its origin and position between the ventral cord and the intestine exactly resembles the chorda of the Vertebrata. Nevertheless the histological structure of this cord is essentially different. If the embryo of an annelide be turned so that its ventral surface lies upwards, its section presents exactly the same arrangement of the organs as in the Selachian embryo. Consequently, by the dis- covery of the segmental organs, the belly of the annulose animal is identified with the back of the vertebrate. This is not the place to trace this conception to its further consequences ; in this respect, as also with regard to the detailed proof of the facts given above, reference must be made to a more complete memoir which will appear shortly in the second volume of the ‘Arbeiten aus dem zoologisch- zootomischen Institut in Wiirzburg.’—Centralbl. fiir die med. Wis- sensch. 1874, No. 35. Wiirzburg, July 1874. Segmental Organs in adult Selachia. By C. Semper. I can now follow up my former preliminary communication on the occurrence of segmental organs in Selachian embryos with a further statement that such organs may also be very easily detected even in adult animals, but only in fresh or very well-preserved 96 Miscellaneous. specimens. The Selachian genera in which I have regularly found them in sexually mature adult individuals are as follows :—Squatina, Scymnus, Centrophorus, Spinax, Acanthias, Hexanchus (in a speci- men 10 feet long), Pristiurus, and Scyllium. In the last genera they are very small, and for the most part also altered; on the other hand, in Scymnus and Squatina they are exceedingly large, furnished with distinct funnel-shaped apertures, into which fine forceps may be conveniently introduced, and are present high up on the sexual fold. In Squatina especially these organs are so numerous, regularly developed, and striking even in the living animal, that it is quite incomprehensible to me how they can have been hitherto overlooked. The following genera are destitute of them when adult—Lamna, Mustelus, Galeus, Carcharias, and probably Sphyrna ; when they disappear, or whether they occur at all in the embryo, still remains to be ascertained. In my first communication I indicated that perhaps the seminal ducts originated from the segmental funnels. This is decidedly not the case; but, on the contrary, it seems probable, especially from their behaviour in Squatina, that the segmental ducts may become the vasa efferentia testis; and by a growth of the epithelium of the segmental funnels the epigonal organ may perhaps be produced. In favour of the supposition that the primitive renal duct becomes the seminal duct we seem to have the two facts :—that in large male embryos only a single canal is to be found, which subsequently becomes the urino-seminal duct; and, secondly, that a tuba occurs in the males of all genera of Rays and Selachia, and passes on each side into a canal exactly as in the females, and this evidently can be nothing but the anterior end of the primitive renal duct. The middle tubal orifice of the males is very large in many genera (Scymnus, Centrophorus, Squatina); the canals running backwards from it (representing the oviducts of the female) are very soon obliterated, and cannot be traced as such to the kidneys in the genera which have hitherto been investigated. In a few species, only a fine cord, but without a cavity, was recognized between the kidney and the hinder extremity of the male tubal canal. Careful investigations of the embryos have proved, however, that the per- manent urino-seminal duct of the male is not the primary primitive renal duct, and that the latter disappears almost entirely in the region of the kidneys, whilst, as in the females, a secondary primi- tive renal duct has been developed as a urino-seminal duct. This is the case also in Chimera. In the males of this species there are two isolated tubal openings which lead into a fine canal lying upon the urino-seminal duct; this corresponds in position to the oviduct of the female, and can be nothing but the primary primitive renal duct. By this Chimera approaches much more closely to the Ganoids than to the Plagiostomi. I hope soon to be in a position to follow up my first memoir, which has already been referred to and will shortly appear, on the seg- mental organs of the Selachia and the relationship of the vertebrate and invertebrate animals, with another on the urogenital system of the Plagiostomi.—Centralbl. fiir die med. Wiss-nsch. 1874, no. 52. Wiirzburg, Oct. 1, 1874. THE ANNALS MAGAZINE OF NATURAL HISTORY. [FOURTH SERIES. ]} No. 86. FEBRUARY 1875. XIN .—Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. By M. Ussow*. “ Developmental history is the true light-bearer for investigations upon organic bodies..—Von Barr (Ueber die Entwickelungsgeschichte der tere, 1828, Bd. i. p. 231). DurRING my residence at Naples and Messina (1871-73) I turned my attention particularly to the exact investigation of the anatomy and developmental history of two extremely interesting classes of Invertebrate animals, namely the Cepha- lopoda and the Tunicata. In various species of the Cepha- lopoda J studied the structure of the female sexual organs, and the formation of the ova, and then, in four species, I traced the embryonal development from the fecundation of the ovum up to the complete development of the young. In the various species of the Tunicata I endeavoured to investigate :—1, the anatomy, the minute structure, and the postembryonal precess of metamorphosis of the central and peripheral nervous system ; 2, the structure and in part also the mode of formation of the organs of sense; 3, the body- wall (the outer and inner mantle) ; 4, the circulatory system ; and lastly, 5, the digestive apparatus, with all its glandular appendages. a4 As I am at present engaged in the detailed description of the by no means uninteresting facts that I observed, I think that a brief statement of the results obtained, such as I here propose to give, may not be without its use. * Translated by W. S. Dallas, F.L.S., from the ‘Archiv fiir Naturge- schichte,’ xl. (1874) p. 328. Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Ser. 4. Vol. xv. 7 98 M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological In vestigations. THE CEPHALOPODA. No group of Invertebrate animals possesses so high an interest as the Cephalopoda with regard to the complication of their bodily structure. And, in fact, since the time of Cuvier*, who, taking the exact data of comparative anatomy into con- sideration, first sharply defined them and separated them from the other classes of Mollusca, they have been placed by most zoologistst at the head of all Invertebrata. Some natural- istst who wished to see zoological classification founded upon embryological facts (at that time still little known and often misunderstood) thought that it might be possible to separate the Cephalopoda altogether from the Molluscan type, and to form a special type of them. Even before this peculiar opinion was expressed, a special kind (evolutio radiata §) ot the so-called unilateral development was established for the Cephalopoda and some other Mollusca. Without denying the merit of these conceptions as to the systematic position of the Cephalopoda in the animal kingdom, which were valu- able in their time, we may be allowed to put the question whether we are sufficiently acquainted with the most important modes of development of the organism of the Caphalsned and whether we are in a position, resting upon embryological facts, to state accurately the most sharply marked traits of their phylogenetic connexion, not with all the other types of the animal kingdom, but merely with the other classes of Mollusca, as with the Gasteropoda, and especially with the Pteropoda||._ If we look closely mto this last highly important scientific question, however, it appears that the positive facts now known to us regarding the developmental history of the Cephalopoda are far from sufficient, even approximately, to elucidate their genealogical relations. Notwithstanding the interesting results which were to be expected from the inves- tigation of the developmental history of as many species of Cephalopoda as possible, we at present possess only three more * Mém. pour servir a hist. de l’Anat. des Mollusques, 1817, Mém. i. + Lamarck, Hist. Nat. des Anim. sans Vert. 2"° édit. xi. p. 165; R. Leuckart, Ueber die Morphol. und die Verwandtschaftsverhiiltn. der wir- bellosen Thiere, 1848 ; Huxley, Lectures on the Elem. of Comp. Anat. 1864, p. 85; Gegenbaur, Vergl. Anat. 2te Aufl. 1870, p. 78; Hiickel, Gen. Morphol. Bad. ii. pp. exv, 408 et seg. ; Claus, Grundziige der Zool. 2te Aufl. 1875, pp. 43, 44, 766 et seq. t Vogt, Zool. Briefe, 1851, Bd. i. p. 298. § Von Baer, “ Beitr. zur Kenntn. dle niederen Thiere,” Nova Acta &e. 2 I ii. 1827; Kolliker, Intwicklungsgesch. der Cephalopoden, 1844, p. 175. | See Leuckart, /. c. p. 154; Gegenbaur, /. ec. p.473; Hickel, le. pp. civ, exv; Keferstein, Klassen und Ord». der Weichthiere, p. 1472. M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. 99 or less detailed and accurate memoirs, which are chiefly de- voted to the embryology of the Decapoda. As early as the year 1841 Van Beneden published his inves- tigations on Sepiola Rondeletii*. In 1844 Kollikert enriched science with his well-known memoir on the development of various species of Decapod and Octopod Cephalopoda. Almost a quarter of century later (1867) E. Metschnikoff | made known his investigations on Sepiola; and last year (1873) Ray Lan- kester published a short communication § on the development of Loligo. It seems scarcely necessary to enumerate the obser- vations of Cuvier||, Dugés{], and Delle Chiaje** relating to this subject, as in most cases they contain very unsatisfactory and erroneous{T statements as to the embryonal process. As it is impossible for me in this short summary to submit the results obtained by Van Beneden and Kélliker to criticism, and as in the following report upon my investigations I indi- cate the most important errors of those savants, I shall devote a moment only to the most accurate of all these memoirs, that of E. Metschnikoff. We may regard as one of the greatest merits of the above- mentioned important memoir, which only relates to one species of Cephalopod, the first description of two germ- lamelle, and the more or less exact indication of the part they take in the subsequent formation of the different organs. Studying the development of Sepzola and the mode of forma- tion of the central nervous system, the intestinal canal, and the central organs of circulation solely in living embryos ff, with- out the aid of dissected preparations, must necessarily have caused Metschnikoff to miss many important facts, even with regard to the species investigated by him. As, moreover, from want of material, he was unable to trace the development of the ova, and especially their process of segmentation, this * “Rech. sur l'embryol. des Sépioles,” in Mém. de l’Acad. de Brux. xiv. + Loc. cit. t History of the embryological development of Sepiola (in Russian), 1867. See Arch. fiir Naturg. 1868, Bd. ii. p. 130, and Arch. des Sci. Phys. et Nat. xxx. (1867) p. 186. The following citations apply to the complete Russian work. § Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. 1873, no. 62, p. 81. || Ann, du Mus. 1832, i. p. 153. q Ann. des Sci. Nat. viil. p. 107, 1857. ** Memorie, 2nd edit. p. 39, 1829; Notom. degli anim. invertebr. 1841, i. p. 83, pl. xxix. figs. 4, 5. tt Kolliker, /. e. pp. 110, 111. tt At least, in his memoir, Metschnikoff nowhere mentions that he studied sections, without which it is impossible to trace the formation of the intestino-fibrous layer, and to form a clear idea of the development of some organs. ™ (| 100 M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. distinguished observer unfortunately could neither subject the results obtained by Kélliker to a thorough testing, nor de- scribe exactly the production of the second germ-lamella (parenchymatous lamella*), nor, finally, ascertain the mode of formation of the intestino-glandular lamella. Undoubtedly Metschnikoff’s observations on the mode of formation of the organs of sight and hearing, so superficially and inaccurately described by his predecessors, are of great value. During my long residence in Naples and Messina I set myself, as one of my principal tasks, to investigate as com- letely as possible the development of several species of Cepha- lo oda, or, in other words, to subject all previous observations relating to this pe boi to a careful examination, in order, as far as possible, to enlarge our exceedingly defective knowledge of the embryology of these interesting animals. By the direct observation of living embryos in various stages, by the employment of the most serviceable method of the comparative examination of different sections, and, lastly, by the investiga- tion of a formative vitellus (which would afterwards be con- verted into the so-called germinal spot and then into the embryo) with its parts firmly united, separated in a particular manner} from the nutritive vitellus, [ have been able to follow step by step the whole developmental cycle of several forms of Cephalopoda. Some difficulties, which met me in this little-followed method of investigation, are fully compen- sated by a series of new and interesting facts, repeatedly con- firmed by me, which I have succeeded in discovering and elucidating. I have already succeeded in observing pretty accurately the development of the embryo im four species of Cephalopoda, namely three Decapods (Sepia officinalis, Linn., Sepiola Ron- * Loe. cit. p. 67. + In general terms this method is as follows:—First of all the fecun- dated ovum, with its capsule, is laid for from five toten minutes in a weak solution of chromic acid, in which the capsule is removed. Then the ovum is placed for two or three minutes in fresh water, mixed with two or three drops of acetic acid. The chorion is removed in another portion of fresh water. The viscid, semifluid nutritive vitellus immediately flows out, while the germ, which is already somewhat hardened, falls to the bottom of the watch-glass. After the removal of the water the germ is carefully spread upon a glass slide, and, after being coloured with carmine, mounted in glycerine. The foundation of this whole operation is that the germ hardens more quickly than the peripheral layer of the nutritive vitellus ; for only in this case will the former separate from all inversions of the latter. By its aid I have succeeded in separating the formative vitellus from the nutritive vitellus, the whole of which it surrounded, and in making a considerable collection of preparations of various stages of development of the Cephalopoda. M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. 101 deletii, Leach, and Loligo sagittata, Lam.) and one Octopod (Argonauta Argo, Linn.). I’or the more convenient exposition of the facts discovered by me, I shall divide this communication into two halves. 1. Anatomico-physiological data relating to the structure of the female generative organs and the mode of formation of the ova*. 2. The results of my embryological investigations upon :— a, the process of segmentation ; 4, the formation of the blasto- derm and the production of the germ-lamellz (first period ot development) ; and ¢, the original foundation of the organs up to the appearance of the typical Cephalopodal formt (second period of development). As the development of the above- mentioned Cephalopoda is very concordant in essential points, I shall not describe the development of the individual species, but the course of development in all the four species, in order to be as concise as possible. I. The structure of the ovaries and the mode of formation of the ova of the Cephalopoda. In youngish female individuals of various species of Cepha- lopoda, the unpaired, rather large ovary, enclosed in the peri- toneal sac, and situated in the lower, narrower part of the mantle, consists of numerous cecal, ramifying tubules, which form its glandular parenchyma. In general the structure of the ovary is like that of the ovary in the Vertebrata, especially in Birds and Tortoisesf. There may be distinguished in it :— a, the very thin sheath (theca follicu/‘), consisting of fibrous connective tissue; 4, the internal, one-layered epithelial mem- brane (membrana granulosa), which lines the inner surfaces of the above-mentioned tubular and vesicular ovarian spaces quite uniformly. In the first of the above-mentioned coats ramifies the thin artery (genital artery), which takes its origin from the lower part of the ventricle. The Graafian follicles are formed at different periods of the spawning (as may be * Besides the above-mentioned species, I have investigated the mode of formation of the ova and some stages of development in Ommastrephes todarus, Rossia macrosoma, and Sepia biserialis, Montf. + I am at present occupied with the study of the last period of deve- lopment of the Cephalopoda, namely the development of the embryo, which I am enabled to do by means of a great store of remarkably well- preserved material. The production of the gay is of especial im- portance in comparative embryology; and to this [ have particularly directed my attention. ¢ As made known by Gegenbaur’s investigations (Arch. fiir Anat. &c. 1861, p. 491); Hiss, Erste Anlage der Wirbelth. p. 19 e¢ seg. pl. ii.; and Waldeier, Der Eierstock, pp. 48 & 69, pl. iv. 102 M. Ussow’s Zvologico-Embryological Investigations. judged from the greater or less maturity of the ova contained in them), and continuously (as quite young ova may always be found in them), and, indeed, as diverticula of the epithelial membrane of the ovary. The primitive ovicell, or the future so-called formative vitellus of the composite ovum, is nothing but a more developed cell of the epithelial coat of the ovary, which constantly growing cell, with the epithelium ee it, separates more and more from the ovarian spaces, an finally remains united to the central mass of the ovary only by a bsiier or shorter peduncle. In the further development of the ovary the racemose or lobate form of that organ is due to the number of such Graafian follicles attached to peduncles and the number of young immature ova enclosed in them. The development of the ova always commences in the central part of the ovary, and increases pretty regularly towards its periphery, where the Graafian follicles and the ova (1-6 millims, in diameter) attain their full development. The relation to the ovary of the entrance into the unpaired (Sepia, Loligo, Sepiola, Rossia) or more rarely paired (Ommastrephes, Argo- nauta) oviduct (paired oviducts are always equally developed) is always the same in all the Cephalopoda investigated by me ; and the mode of escape of the mature ova first into the ventral cavity, and then their gradual passage into the oviducts, which contract peristaltically (Argonauta*), and are sometimes re- peatedly twisted and bent, remind one of the similar processes in some Carnivora (Lutra). The naked ovicellt (gymnocyta), with the nucleus (= germinal vesicle) and the nucleolus (=germinal spot), grows simultaneously with the Graafian fol- licle, so that at first both increase in size pretty uniformly. But soon the growth of the Graafian follicle advances more rapidly by multiplication (longitudinal division) of the cells of the membrana granulosa, which forms, on the inner surface, a series of longitudinal and transverse folds penetrating into the vesiclef. The blood-vessels lying on the surface of the epi- thelial envelope penetrate into the interspaces of the above- mentioned folds, by which means both the considerably en- * The oviducts of this animal, taken out of the body and laid in water, continue to contract for a long time, by which means it becomes possible to obtain perfectly fresh ova belonging to different stages of segmentation. Ova procured in this manner, or even taken out of perfectly mature Graafian follicles, generally undergo further development. + In Loligo and Argonarda at this time 0-008 millim. in diameter. t In Sepia these folds are double, but only the inner ones form the diverticula described below; the outer ones, on the contrary, form a uniformly diffused layer between the inner ones and the thin theca folli- culi. Between the two kinds of folds the blood-vessels ramify, and new ovicells originate. ——— a M. Ussow’s 4voloyico-Embryological Investigations. 103 larged cells of the granulosa and the ovicell, which has been pushed by the folds to the superior pole of the originally round Graatian follicle, are abundantly provided with nourishment. At this time—that is to say, in the period of the “ foldings”’ Kélliker)—the cells of the epithelial membrane begin to secrete the fluid, fatty, transparent nutritive vitellus. Consequently the fold-formation of the granulosa only serves for the tempo- rary enlargement of the inner surface of the Graafian follicle, which secretes the nutritive vitellus. In this state each Graatian follicle may be regarded as an independent gland. Of the vitelline membrane (chorion*) there is at this time not the slightest trace; so that the description of the nature of the so-called “ folding-process”” as given by other observersT proves to be very superficial and erroneous (of which I have tully convinced myself). The chorion is formed subsequently, after the nutritive vitellus is completely secreted and the ovum has attained the limit of its perfect development. The chorion, which is at first fluid and viscous, is, indeed, nothing but a secreted product of the granulosa of the Graafian follicle, which may be proved by the fact, among others, that at the commencement of its formation, especially at the apo somewhat acuminated pole, its composition of several thin superimposed layers may be distinctly observed. At the same time there is formed at the above-mentioned thickened part of the chorion, in a manner which, I must confess, 1s still obscure to mef, its tubular micropyle, more or less widened and funnel-shaped in its upper part. This I have found in all the above-mentioned species and groups of the Cephalopoda. At a very early stage of development the Graafian fol- licle gradually changes its spherical form, and acquires the shape of an egg pointed at the upper free pole. The enclosed ovum follows in its form that of the Graafian follicle. The primitive ovicell with the nucleus (=germinal vesicle) moves, as already stated, to the upper pole of the Graafian follicle, which is now pretty acute (Loligo, Sepiola, Argonauta), and the granulosa of which has scarcely any folds and appears quite smooth at this part. Here, therefore, is the finely gra- nular protoplasm of the primitive ovicell ; and by this means * Kolliker (J. c. p. 15) and other observers (Klassen und Ordn. Bd. ii. . 1405) quite erroneously take the external pluristratified capsule of the beoksls od ovum for the chorion, and the true chorion (formed within the Graafin follicle and always furnished with a micropyle) for the vitelline membrane. a + Ko6lliker, /. c. pp. 2-13; Brandt, Mediz. Zool. Bd. ii. p. 300, Taf. xxxii. fig. 27; Owen, Memoir on the Pearly Nautilus, p. 42. { Where the micropyle is situated there are no folds (“ free space,” Kolliker), and the ei lle granulosa there forms a thin layer. 104 M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. it acquires the form of a very flat, conical disk, in the thick- ‘ened central part of which the germinal vesicle is situated. The above-described folds of the granulosa are gradually effaced as the ovum enlarges, and finally disappear alto- gether, so that at last it becomes perfectly smooth both within and without. The perfectly mature ovum by its own weight ruptures the very thin part of the envelope (the so-called stigma) at the upper pole, and is fecundated* at the moment when it falls into the ventral cavity (Argonauta). For the elucidation of the above-mentioned question as to the continual development of the ova of Cephalopoda com- mencing at different times, I may add that I have succeeded in observing that, at the time of the strongest development of the folds, new ova are developed in the Graafian follicle from any of the cells of the epithelial membrane. A part of the inner surface of the fold gradually covers the newly formed ovum, which during its enlargement protrudes at the surface, becomes constricted off from the Graafian follicle, and finally remains united to the theca folliculi only by means of a short peduncle. Thus, in consequence of more or less copious nutrition, the cells of the granulosa of a Graafian follicle ma in a short lapse of time bring the primitive ovicell to full de- velopment, and secrete the whole mass of the nutritive vitellus and finally the transparent choriont. ‘This is in its main features the mode of formation of the Graafian follicle and the ova of the Cephalopoda. Of its correctness I am perfectly convinced by an attentive and frequently repeated study of the process. As regards the original development of the female sexual organs of the Cephalopoda, I could not trace it, as it appears to be correct that the mature embryo, after its escape from the egg, and even the young animal from one to three days old, possess no trace of these organs { ; but at the end of three days, during which it has used up the whole of the outer and a part of the inner nutritive vitellus, the animal dies, and consequently deprives us of all possibility of inves- tigating the development of the sexual organs and the part taken by the germ-lamelle in their construction. With * I can assert this positively with regard to the fecundation of Argo- nauta. Although in al the other species, also, | found perfectly mature a sieved ao in the ovaries, the segmentation takes place always outside the body, which would indicate a pause between the fecundation and the commencement of development. + In Argonauta also the longer or shorter filiform process. t The same results were obtained also by Kolliker (/.¢. p. 110) and Metschnikoff(2.c. p. 65). At the end of the third period I have observed below the ventricle in Sepia and Loligo an aggregation of cells, from which it is possible the sexual organs are developed. M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. 105 regard to the spawning-time*, the number of mature ova and other details in the formation and development of the Graafian follicle and other accessory glandular organs (albumen- or nidimental glands of the Cephalopoda), I reserve their de- scription for a complete memoir on the animals named. II. Segmentation of the ova of the Cephalopoda, and forma- tion of the one-layered germ (blastoderm). The whole of the mature ova which fall from the Graafian follicles into the ventral cavity are, apparently, without ex- ception, fecundatedt. The mature Dephileded ovum, which, in form, is very like a hen’s egg, contains the following parts :—1, a very small mass of the so-called formative vitellus, which, as we have seen, represents the finely granular proto- plasm of the primitive ovicell with its nucleus (germinal vesicle) ; 2, a greater or less quantity of the rather viscous, fatty nutritive vitellus; 3, a perfectly transparent albuminous substance which occupies the space between the vitellus and, 4, the many-layered vitellime membrane (chorion) with its tubuliform micropyle; and, lastly, 5, a more or less thick, many-layered egg-capsule which sometimes runs out into an elastic thread, serving to attach the ova to various objects under water (Argonauta}, Sepia), and sometimes forms a on or shorter sac containing 10-100 or more ova (Sepiola, oligo). At the moment of fecundation the germinal vescicle does not disappear ; and the segmentation of the finely granular protoplasm of the primitive ovicell, or the so-called formative vitellus, which may easily be distinguished by its somewhat dark coloration from the nutritive vitellus, always com- mences with the cleavage of the germinal vesicle. In Argo- nauta the process of segmentation takes place chiefly in the body of the mother, and, indeed, during the movement of the ova in the tortuous oviducts§$ ; whilst in all the other Cepha- lopoda observed by me the segmentation always seems to * In Argonauta the spawning-time lasts from May to August, in Loligo, Sepiola, and Ommastrephes from March to June; but I obtained mature ova of Sepia in Naples almost all the year round, except in August. + Among the thousands of Cephalopod ova which I have examined, scarcely any unfecundated ova occurred. t In Argonauta to the apex of the shell, so that the female, which is seated in the shell, covers with her hinder parts the racemose groups of eggs para e: within the spire. § L observed the first stage of segmentation in ova which were taken out of the entrance to the oviducts, whilst in those near the orifice, eight, or even sixteen, segments are already present. 103 M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. commence outside the body of the parent. The segmentation of the formative vitellus of the Cephalopoda ereatly reminds us, as regards its form, of the segmentation of the eggs of birds * and Cheloniat+. In all the four species of Cephalopoda investigated by me it is ¢rregular. The division of the pro- toplasm of the formative vitellus commences in its thickened central part, and spreads towards the attenuated peripheral part, which uniformly surrounds the whole surface of the nutritive vitellus. The latter takes no part in the segmentation pro- cess (“ partial segmentation”). One of the chief causes of the segmentation of the formative vitellus seems to be the great mobility of its protoplasm, and the changes of position of its heaviest parts, the darkest-coloured granules. The segmentation always begins in the vicinity of the nuclei of the segmentation-cells (spheres of segmentation) or segments ; and the close of the complete cleavage (by longitudinal or afterwards transverse division) coincides with the complete separation of the nuclei. At first all the cleavages appear only at the surface of the formative vitellus, but then gradually penetrate by deepening to the lowest layers of the proto- plasm. The original or first furrowt, which divides the whole formative vitellus into two equal segments lying side by side, is soon (in about two hours) intersected at right angles by a second furrow. As the result of this division four equal seg- ments, enclosing four clear nuclei, are produced (the nucleoli are entirely deficient). In the central point there is produced a very inconsiderable clear interspace, which in the sequel soon disappears. The subsequent cleavages of the formative vitellus are irregular; from four segments there are formed (in four hours), first stv, and then ezght equal segments. In the period between the formation of the six and of the eight segments, there are produced at the centre of union of the furrows, in the earliest moments of the appearance of the two narrowest segments, by constriction of the apices of these, two primitive cells or spheres of segmentation (approximately be- tween the third and fourth hour of the process of segmenta- tion). From the two of the eight segments which are situated * Coste, Hist. part. et gén. des corps organisés, p. 287, pl. ii. + Agassiz, Contrib. to the Nat. Hist. of the United States, ii. { In Loligo, Sepiola, and Argonauta this furrow appears directly beneath the micropyle, in the centre of the formative vitellus; in Sepia sometimes a little to one side, which I regard as an abnormal phenomenon, as also that I once in Sepiola found the segmentation on Shotawes obtuse pole of the ovum. The hours mentioned in the following description of the pro- cess of segmentation relate to Sepiola and Loligo. M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. 107 opposite the narrow segments just mentioned, two very large segmentation-spheres are now separated by constriction (during the fourth hour) ; and these place themselves directly opposite to the two primitive spheres. In this way, in about four hours from the commencement of segmentation, there are apc eight segments and four spheres of segmentation. ‘rom these four, and ten subsequently produced spheres of segmentation, originates, by means of further spontaneous division (longitudinal division), the central part of the ger- minal disk. In the subsequent stages we observe the following :—1, a rapid multiplication of the central segmentation-spheres, a, by spontaneous longitudinal division, and, 4, by the rather rapidly advancing constriction of the apices of the segments ; and, 2,a multiplication of the segments by their slower longi- tudinal division. In this way, about the seventh hour of the process of segmentation, there are produced 10-12 radiating fa ae whilst there are still only four central segmentation- spheres ; in the eleventh hour there are eighteen segments and at the same time fourteen segmentation-spheres (eight by divi- sion of the four above mentioned, and six newly constricted apices of the two longitudinal and four lateral segments). In the next (twelfth) hour a sphere is separated by constriction, by means of the so-called meridional segmentation, from each segment; all these spheres collect around those previously formed, and consequently at this stage the number of seg- ments amounts to eighteen, and that of the segmentation- spheres to thirty-two. Inthe next stage of segmentation the number of segments increases to thirty-two, which surround the germinal disk. But the latter now consists of 108-110 cells, larger towards the periphery, smaller in the centre, which have multiplied in this manner by increased division. The number of nuclei of the segmentation-spheres and seg- ments likewise increases, a nucleus being contained in every sphere and in every segment. Both kinds of cells show no trace of a membrane; their finely granular protoplasm be- comes constantly darker, and is transformed from a trans- parent to a translucent substance. During the whole course of the process of segmentation the outwardly directed surfaces of all the segments, and especially of all the segmentation-spheres, are much raised, the highest being placed in the centre of the formative vitellus. At the close of the whole process, in the last stages, their convexities are far less observable; and finally the tubercular surface of the formative vitellus becomes quite smooth. As the final result of all these divisions, the one-/ayered germinal disk 108 M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. (‘‘ germinal spot,” Kélliker) is produced. In this, as regards the size and form of its constituent cells, and also their dis- tribution, the following two divisions may be distinguished : —1, the centre of the germinal disk, which presents the form of a convex circle, and has been formed by the multiplication of the high cylindrical primitive segmentation-cells (see the stage of eight segments) ; and, 2, the originally very narrow, but gradually widening ring, which immediately follows the above-mentioned disk : the somewhat broader, but flatter, pen- tagonal or hexagonal cells of which have been formed chiefly from the apices of the segments constricted off by the meri- dional furrow (see the stage of the meridional furrow). Directly united with this ring is the ¢nferior part, which extends to the inferior pole of the nutritive vitellus and encloses the latter. This part consists of the apices of seg- ments* slowly advancing in their division, and of the segments themselves, which are here (at the inferior pole) not sharply separated, but often even mutually coa- lescent. Their number remains as before (thirty-two). Their finely granular protoplasm covers with a very thin layer the whole mass of the nutritive vitellus, which in this way is enclosed as in an envelope from the very commence- ment of the segmentation in the so-called formative vitellus, or, to be more exact, in the protoplasm of the primitive ovi- cell, lying uniformly on its surface except at the superior pole, where it 1s perceptibly thickened. The so-called disappear- ance of the segments in reality never occurs. Larlier or later they all divide, as we shall see, and furnish a certain number of the cells forming the one-layered blastoderm f. From the actual course of the process of segmentation of the Cephalopod ovum here described, and which I have traced in all its details, we may easily convince ourselves of the inac- curacy of the opinion expressed by Kélliker upon this ques- tion. And, in fact, I have perfectly convinced myself, by a series of frequently repeated investigations, that he observed stages in the development of the ova of Sepia which were quite independent of each other, and that his researches were carried on under abnormal conditions, in which the union of the segments and the segmentation-apices was already much injured. Thus, for example, Kélliker indicates in the centre of union of the segmentation-spheres indefinite and irregular * In the last stage of segmentation the apex of every segment divides into groups of cells, which arrange themselves in parallel rows on the equator. _t In Sepia the blastoderm closes at the inferior pole of the nutritive vitellus only in the second period, as, indeed, K@lliker has described. ae M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. 109 interspaces, such as I have seen in no species investigated by me. ‘The mode of formation of the embryonal cells is also, as follows from the preceding statements, quite erroneously described by Kélliker. III. The formation of the Germ-lamelle. The above-mentioned concluding stage of the process of segmentation (7. e. the appearance of the germinal disk, or the one-layed germ, consisting of the upper germ-lamella, which appears at the upper pointed part of the nutritive vitellus and covers a twelfth part of it) occurs in most of the Cephalo- poda observed by me on the second day after the commence- ment of development*. The important moment of the are of the second germ-lamella falls in the beginning of the third day (Sepia, Loligo, Ommastrephes). The original separation of the second germ-lamella takes place in the fol- lowing manner :—In the middle part of the above-mentioned one-layered ring, situated immediately below the centre of the germ (now very like the area opaca), the cells, which are continually undergoing further division in a longitudinal di- rection, begin also to divide gradually in a transverse direc- tion, the division commencing at the lower periphery and advancing towards the centre. The nucleus of each cell of the one-layered upper germ-lamella becomes elongated; and at the same time the protoplasm is also elongated, like a drop, downwards; and then a new cell is constricted off from the mother cell. As the result of this transverse division a second germ-lamella is produced, at first only in the median ring of the germinal disk, but afterwards also in the central part and in the segment-part. At the spots where it has been formed, the germinal disk soon becomes quite opaque, and appears dull white by direct light. In the following days (about to the fourth or fifth) the above-described process of growth is continued, and now in all parts of the germinal disk, by which means, 1, the diameter of its still one-layered central part increases considerably ; 2, the middle two- or more-layered thick part (area opaca) spreads more and more towards the inferior pole; and, 3, the region of the segments dividing up into cell-groups which follows directly on the ring now commences at the equator of the vitellus (and therefore much lower than before). The thick- * In Argonaua the germinal disk is formed as early as the seventh or eighth hour from the commencement of segmentation. 110 M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. ened inner layer of the area opaca, which consists of rounded, scattered, spontaneously dividing cells* (of the second germ- lamella), forms, at the boundary of the central part of the germinal disk, a wall which penetrates more or less into the nutritive vitellus. In consequence of this pressure, the nutri- tive vitellus on its part penetrates into the slightly rising central part of the germinal disk (like the ‘ Dotterpfropfe”’ of the frog’s egg). At the same time a very narrow second ring is formed from the cells separated by constriction from the segments ; this lies between the first ring and the segments. On the sixth and seventh days this new ring exactly sur- rounds the equator of the vitellus. Its four- or five-angled cells, which are rather large, lie in consecutive series. Indeed, in general, all the cells, both of the inner and outer germ- lamella, arrange themselves in such consecutive series ; the latter, during their division (constriction), when they are for a short time free, move upon the surface of the nutritive vitel- lus by means of their contractile protoplasm and longer or shorter pseudopodia. At the end of the seventh day the cells of the central coni- cal part of the upper germ-lamella multiply very rapidly by longitudinal division (Sepiola, Loligo, Argonauta). By this means is produced a thickening, which, however, by no means occupies the whole central part of the germinal disk, but only forms at its margin an oval fold, which, spreading in the polar direction, begins gradually to conceal the central part. Simul- taneously with the formation of this fold, the part of the germinal disk circumscribed by the fold sinks a little and forms a furrow broader and deeper in the middle, having the shape of an extended rhomboid. In the rhomboid the ger- minal disk consists of a single layer of cells of the upper germ- lamella. But beneath the oval fold the cell-layer of the second germ-lamella which is there thickened begins to double itself by transverse division, and thus forms two layers—the upper the dermo-muscular layer, and the lower the itntestino-fibrous layer. ‘These two layers may be most clearly observed at the boundary of the former area opaca and the central part of the germinal disk, and, indeed, on the future ventral surface of the embryo, whilst at first they gradually coalesce towards both the equator and the pole, so as not to be distinguishable. The further splitting of the second germ-lamella into two superposed layers takes place * The cells divide both in a longitudinal and transverse direction, by bray means their layer becomes thicker and broader towards the obtuse pole. M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. 111 at the time when the nutritive vitellus is entirely surrounded* at the inferior pole by the cells of the upper germ-lamella formed by terminal resion of the segments, and by the upper layer of elongated fusiform cells of the second germ- lamella. On the seventh and eighth days the germ enclosing the nutritive vitellus gradually changes its form from oval to perfectly spherical. In Telos, Sepiola, and Ommastrephes the surfaces of most of the cells of the upper germ-lamella (sphe- rical embryo) (those on the part where the eye-ovals will be formed and some others excepted) become covered with cilia, which, in the species above enumerated, cause the rotation of the embryo by their continual movement. In Sepia and Argonauta the embryo does not rotate, either in this or the following stage of development. The period of formation of the blastoderm (including the process of segmentation) lasts from four (Argonauta) to nine (Loligo, Sepiola) and more days (? Sepia). Thus at the commencement of the rotation, with which the second period of development (that of the production of the organs) begins, the germ covers the whole of the nutritive vitellus, and consists of two germ-lamelle here and there composed of several layers, namely :—1. The blastoderm or upper germ-lamella (Hornblatt). The thickness of this lamella, which is still one-layered, increases somewhat as we approach the upper pole of the nutritive vitellus}, and, indeed, at the point where the oval fold covering the rhomboidal part of the germ, situated on the dorsal surface of the embryo, is formed. The rhomboidal centre of the germ, which was at first round, and the oval, broader or narrower annular fold originate from the considerably grown central part of the ger- minal disk, situated at the acute pole and bordering upon the so-called area opaca; but this part itself has originated from the fourteen primitive segmentation-spheres, which rapidly increased in number and appeared at different times. The middle portion of the germ, which now covers nearly half the surface of the nutritive vitellus (from the margin of the above-mentioned fold to the equator) and attains its greatest breadth upon the dorsal surface, represents the con- siderably widened middle ring of the germinal disk, which originated from the multiplication of the cells chiefly con- stricted off from the segments by the meridional furrow. Here * In Loligo, Sepiola, aud Argonauta; in Sepia the blastoderm, as already remarked, only closes in the second period of development. + By transverse division of its cells, which become cylindrical and generally contain two sharply defined nuclei. 112. M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. also the first germ-lamella is thickened (especially at the sides and on the dorsal surface) by its cells dividing rapidly in the longitudinal direction, by which means they become higher and cylindrical. This part is followed immediately by the rather narrow girdle-like part, originating from the segmentation-spheres uniformly separated by constriction from all the thirty-two segments, which occupies the equator of the vitellus, and is bounded above by the middle portion (the future trunk of the animal), and below by the blastoderm (rudiment of the yelk- sac), which is everywhere uniformly thin, two-layered, and closed at the inferior pole. In the above-mentioned peripheral girdle-like portion of the spherical germ the cells are broad, but at the same time flat; so that this part is as thin as the rudiment of the yelk-sac. At the end of the first period all the cells of the upper germ-lamella are distinguished only by their height and breadth ; as regards their form there is nothing peculiar to certain parts of this germ-lamella. There are cells with three or four angles, and with them others with five, six, seven, or even eight angles. 2. The second or middle germ-lamella, which attains its greatest thickness at the oval fold, and splits into two layers, the dermo-muscular layer and the intestino-fibrous layer. With the development of the germ this cleavage of the middle germ-lamella increases both by the transverse division of its cells and also by the spreading of the two layers, which takes place in the direction from the rhomboidal centre towards the yelk-sac. The two layers of the second germ-lamella show the follow- ing characters :—a. The dermo-muscular layer (Hautmuskel- schicht) thickens somewhat in the central part of the blasto- derm and in the girdle-like ring situated on the equator of the vitellus ; by the continued gradual division of the cells of the blastoderm (see the commencement of the formation of the second germ-lamella), and by the independent longitudinal division of its cells, this layer grows pretty rapidly beneath the upper germ-lamella and becomes closed at the inferior pole of the nutritive vitellus. 6. The intestino-fibrous layer (Darm- faserschicht), as the development of the germ goes on, occurs not only on the ventral surface (below the oval annular fold of the rhomboidal centre), but its rather loose cell-series, lying immediately upon the nutritive vitellus, also increase towards the dorsal surface in the middle part of the germ. Various sec- tions from earlier stages (e.g. of the tenth day) show that the cells of the intestino-fibrous layer accumulate most on the sides of the longitudinal axis of the germ, namely where the COO Mr. H. J. Carter on the Genus Rossella. 113 alimentary apparatus will afterwards be developed. Near the boundary between the middle and the girdle-like parts this layer entirely ceases, and in the girdle-like part (region of the formation of the arms) and further to the sate of the nutritive vitellus and round the latter we only meet with the cells of the dermo-muscular layer, as has already been stated. Con- sequently the lower or intestino-fibrous layer of the second erm-lamella, as may easily be seen, originates by transverse ivision of the originally one-layered second germ-lamella, and therefore in the same way as the latter lamella itself from the cells of the one-layered blastoderm or the upper germ-lamella. The cells of both layers of the middle germ-lamella are always rather smaller, but are more numerous than those of the upper lamella. In form they are generally oval, not unfrequently extended (in the wall of the yelk-sac); their protoplasm is dark, fatty ; and the nucleus (or often two) enclosed in each cell can scarcely be detected without reagents. None of the cells of either the second or the upper germ-lamella contain any trace of membranes. It is not without a purpose that I have dwelt so long on the mode of formation, the individuality, and the distribution of the first two germ-lamelle, seeing that the only extant memoir treating of this subject (namely that of E. Metschni- koff*) is not quite sactisfactory. In the first place, this naturalist has not recognized the second or inferior lamella (“ parenchymatése ’’) as the middle one; and secondly, he has not referred to its cleavage into the two layers above described, which play so important a ea in the formation of the em- bryonal organism. I regard it as almost unnecessary to add that my wearisome investigations of the development of four different species of Cephalopoda completely contradict the opinion put forward by Kélliker t, according to which both the germ-lamelle are denied to the Cephalopoda. [To be continued. } XIV.—On the Genus Rossella (a Hexactinellid Sponge), with the Descriptions of three Species, By H. J. Carter, F.R.S. &e. [Plate X.] In 1872 I published some figures of two forms of sponge- spicule which were found abundantly adhering to fragments of a Tethya (T. antarctica, C.) that had been dredged up from * Loe. cit. p. 19. + Loe. cit. p. 167. Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Ser. 4. Vol. xv. 114 Mr. H. J. Carter on the Genus Rossella. the bottom of the Antarctic Ocean by Sir J. Ross, in 300 and 206 fathoms and in 744° and 774° south latitude respec- tively,jwhich, with other deep-sea specimens obtained at the same time, had been handed over to{the British Museum by the Admiralty. For the sponge from which these spicules were supposed to have been ore I proposed the generic name of “‘ftossella,” and for the species “2. antarctica” (‘Annals,’ 1872, vol. ix. p. 414, pl. xxi). One form of the spicules was regarded as odal or anchoring, and the other as belonging more directly to the body of the sponge. In the same year another specimen of this genus was ob- tained by the British Museum from Cebu, one of the Philip- pine Islands, through Dr. A. B. Meyer (‘Annals,’ 1872, vol. x. p. 113), and named by Dr. Gray “Lossella philippensis” (ib. p. 137). In March 1873 four more specimens of the same sponge were obtained by the British Museum from the same neigh- bourhood, again through Dr. Meyer; and from their having a different aspect, Dr. Gray proposed for these the name of “Psetalia globulosa,” stating that they would be described by myself more particularly thereafter (‘Annals,’ 1873, vol. x1. . 234). ; Subsequently (that is, in the month of June following) I received from Prof. Wyville Thomson the specimen of R. velata from which his figure in ‘The Depths of the Sea’ (p. 418) was taken. And in the month of March 1874 glass jar was discovered in the British Museum, containing two small specimens of the veritable Rossella antarctica, dredged up by Sir J. Ross in 300 fathoms, 744° south latitude, no doubt at the same time that the fragments of the Tethya antarctica and the spicules above mentioned were obtained. Thus provided, I have been able to compare all these spe- cimens, and find that they all belong to one genus, viz. /os- sella, but that the Antarctic, Philippine, and Atlantic deep- sea ones possess peculiarities entitling them to be consi- dered three different species. These peculiarities will appear in the following descriptions respectively, beginning with that of Rossella antarctica, Carter. Pl. X. fig. 4. General form sac-like, compressed (? nat.), with the upper end truncated and open, and the lower one conical and closed (fig. 4, a). Aperture elliptical, more or less elongate, corre- Mr. H. J. Carter on the Genus Rossella. 115 sponding with the long transverse diameter of the body (fig. 5, a), leading into a cavity of much the same shape as that of the sponge externally (fig. 4,¢e). Sessile or fixed by anchoring-spicules. Colour grey. External surface uniformly cribellate and monticular, covered by a thin layer of spicular latticework, and surmounted by three forms of projecting spicules situated respectively on the truncate end, on the body, and on the conical end, as will be more particularly described hereafter. Internal surface, or that of the cavity, uniformly smooth, interrupted by depressions or pits increasing in size towards the lower part. Body or wall constructed of a dense interlacement of large and small spicules, rendered more solid and areolar by the addition of sarcode charged with the minute spicules of the species, and accompanied throughout by the ramifications of the excretory canal-system. Layer of lattice- work formed of minute, sexradiate, spiniferous spicules, whose horizontal ayms, spreading out at right angles to and over- lapping each other, form a quadrangular retiform structure held together by the dermal sarcode. Pores situated in the sarcode filling the quadrangular spaces of the latticework. Vents opening into the pit-like depressions on the surface of the cavity. Spicules of three kinds, viz. appendicular, struc- tural, and flesh-spicules. A. Appendicular, of three forms, corresponding with their respective localities :—1. That con- stituting an erect beard, about a quarter of an inch long, situ- ated round the aperture (fig. 4, c), stout, linear, smooth, nearly straight, fusiform, acerate, finely pointed at each end, averaging 10-12ths by 8-1800ths of an inch in its greatest diameters. 2. Anchoring-spicule, which issues from the surface of the body generally, beginning very scantily above in little groups here and there, which increase in number, size, and length towards the lower or conical end, where they attain their maximum size and density (fig. 4,dd): stout, smooth, linear, commencing in a finely attenuated end which is fixed in the sarcode of the body, and gradually passing into a thick shaft which is abruptly terminated at the free end by four opposite, stout, recurved spines or hooks (fig. 3); average largest size 3 to 4 inches by 5-1800ths of an inch in its greatest diameters, hooks 30 by 5-1800ths of an inch. 3. Crucially headed or veil-spicules, projecting chiefly from the monticules, over every part of the external surface but the aperture, consisting of a shaft whose pointed or inner end is fixed in the sarcode of the body, and whose free or outer one is terminated by four long arms spread out horizontally so as to intercross with those of its neighbours, and thus form a general veil-like covering separated from the body by the length of the ae between 116 Mr. H. J. Carter on the Genus Rossella. the body and their heads respectively (fig. 4, b 4); shaft smooth, or only microtuberculate over the imbedded end; arms more or less flexuous, fine-pointed, parting from the head of the shaft at different angles, covered almost throughout with minute spines, closely approximated, amongst which, here and there, is a much larger spine, curved and inclined outwards or from the head of the shaft; average largest size 2 to 3-12ths by 5-1800ths of an inch in the greatest diameters, both for the arms and shaft respectively, the former for the most part longer than the latter. B. Structural spicules (that is, of the body or wall) of three forms, viz. :—4. Nail-like or crucially headed, much like that last described, but with the shaft shorter and the arms longer; the former vertically placed in the wall and the latter spread out horizontally over its external surface, so as to support the lattice-like layer of minute sexradiate spicules imbedded in the dermal sarcode immediately above and the shafts of the veil-spicules beyond; arms more or less curved inwards, so as to render the head of the spicule pro- minent or monticular, thus characterizing the surface by a number of conical eminences linked together by radiating arms. 5. A long linear spicule, nearly straight, fusiform, often presenting in the middle two or four tubercles corresponding to the ends of the crucial branches of the sexradiate central canal, terminating in spined and more or less inflated ex- tremities, but otherwise smooth ; average largest size 3-12ths by 2-1800ths of an inch in its greatest diameters ; situated on the inner side of the wall chiefly, where it forms, together with minute sexradiates and flesh-spicules, the surface of the concavity. 6. Sexradiates, of different sizes, with arms of equal length, spined and pointed, chiefly composing the lattice- like structure, which, in the way above stated, covers the whole of the dermal surface with quadrangular interstices from 1-300th to 1-150th of an inch in diameter. c. Flesh- spicules of four rosette-forms, chiefly situated in the surface- layer of the cavity:—7. Sexradiate rosette with smooth pointed arms of equal length (‘ Annals,’ 1873, vol. xii. pl. xiii. fig. 1). 8. Sexradiate rosette with short arms and double rays (7b. fig. 3). 9. Very minute sexradiate rosette with numerous straight capitate rays (Pl. X. fig. 7,4). 10. Sex- radiate rosette with thick, sparsely spined arms (fig. 6, a), whose inflated ends support four or more indistinctly capitate rays (fig. 6, 6c): rays microspined, thick at first, then becoming finely attenuated and terminating in a hardly perceptible capi- tate inflation (fig. 6, d); rays at first straight and parallel like the prongs of a dinner-fork, becoming more or less divergent towards their extremities (fig. 6); average largest size of the Mr. H. J. Carter on the Genus Rossella. 117 arm 33 by 1-6000th of an inch in its greatest diameters, that of the inflation and rays about 7}-6000ths of an inch long (N.B. This is the characteristic rosette of the species). Size of entire specimen 1#inch long by 10-12ths of an inch broad, and 74$-12ths of an inch thick; aperture about 74-12ths of an inch long by 2-12ths wide; margin thick, round; depth of cavity 1} inch; thickness of wall about 3-12ths of an inch. Hab, Ocean-bed. Loc. Antarctic Sea in 300 fathoms, and lat. 744° S. Obs. 'The hexactinellid character of the spicules of this sponge, together with the free termination of the “ anchoring- spicule”’ in four stout spines or hooks recurved and opposite (Pl. X. fig. 3), characterizes the genus, viz. that of “Rossella;”’ while the erect beard of spicules round the aperture (fig. 4, c), and the peculiar form of the flesh-spicule (no. 10, fig. 6), which is by far the most abundant, determine the species, viz. 2. ant- arctica, ‘There is no rosette-like flesh-spicule that I have yet seen whereiu the arms are so distinctly, although so sparsely, spined, and the rays so parallel, so little divergent at their extremities, and so little inflated or capitate. (Altogether, the slightly inflated end of the arm, and the microspined rays which it supports, are a miniature form of the head of the scopiform spicule of Aphrocallistes beatrix, ‘Annals,’ 1873, vol. xii. pl. xv. fig. 2.) It is not improbable that there are other forms of the rosette flesh-spicule present in this species besides those described; but if so, I have not seen them, and if there are any, they are of no consequence in a specific point of view after no. 10. R. antarctica further differs from the two following species, so far as my observations extend, in not possessing the other flesh-spicules or forms of rosette which are common to both R. velata and R. philippensis; while it agrees with &. velata in the more or less developed state of all the arms of the sex- radiate spicule of the latticework layer on the surface, thus differing from R. philippensis, in which for the most part the four horizontal arms alone are present. I have described the monticular and latticework layer of the surface in a much more perfect state than it exists in the specimens of 2. antarctica to which I have alluded, where, from rough usage at some time or other, as in some of the specimens of 2. philippensis, a great part of the latticework layer has been abraded, thus rendering the cribellate and monticular surface below more evident; but still enough of the former remains here and there to show what the specimen was in its entirety. From the presence of several minute specimens of this 118 Mr. H. J. Carter on the Genus Rossella. sponge growing upon little bundles of anchoring-spicules pro- jecting from the surface, it seems probable, if these do not originate in ova which have respectively fixed themselves were for development, that they arise a pullulation or budding. In my description of R. antarctica the spicules are numbered 1 to 10 inclusively, to avoid unnecessary repetition in the fol- lowing species, which will also be described generally with reference to what has already been stated. Lastly, by comparing my representation of 2. antarctica (Pl. X. fig. 4), and its previously delineated spicules (/. c.) with Schmidt’s representations of his “/oltenia Pourtalesti” (‘Atlantisch. Spongienfaun.’ Taf. i. figs. 1-6), the probability of the latter being a species of Rossella, as I have heretofore stated, will appear still greater. Rossella philippensis, Gray. PI. X. fig. 1. General form globular (fig. 2), ovate, or cup-shaped (fig. 1), thus perhaps varying in accordance with the age, development, and wearing of the specimen ; presenting a flattened summit in which there is an aperture (fig. 1,d), and a conical base which is closed, but rendered irregular by mammiform pro- longations of the body, out of each of which issues a hair- like lock of long anchoring-spicules (fig. 1, eee c) ; mammi- form prolongations &c. increasing in size with age, dispersed over the body generally, but largest and most prominent at the lower part. Aperture circular and contracted in the young or globular forms (fig. 2, 4), elliptical elongate in the ovate, and patulous in the old, worn or cup-like form (fig. 1, d) ; leading into a cavity of much the same shape as that of the sponge externally. Sessile or fixed by the anchoring-spicules. Colour grey. External surface uniformly even, except where interrupted by the mammiform prolongations of the body ; cribellate immediately below the latticework layer, surmounted by one form of spicule only, which issues, as before stated, in hair-like locks Se the summits of the prolongations, and will be more particularly described hereafter. Internal surface, or that of the cavity, uniformly smooth, interrupted by de- pressions or pits (fig. 1, e e), so increasing in size downwards as to occupy the whole of the lower part. Body or wall the same as in the foregoing species. External or dermal surface covered by the same rind of latticework. Pores and vents the same respectively. Spicules of three kinds, viz. appen- dicular, structural, and flesh-spicules. a. Appendicular, of one form only, viz. the ‘‘ anchoring ” one, no, 2 in the fore- a eee re eee — Mr. H. J. Carter on the Genus Rossella. 119 going description, but much larger and longer, increasing in size towards the lower part, where they are 6 inches in length. B. Structural, the same as in the foregoing species, but with no spines on the shaft or arms of the a Ea headed one. c. Flesh-spicules of eight forms (see ‘Annals,’ 1873, vol. xii. pl. xiii.), viz. figs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 12 inclusively, onl that figs. 2, 3, and 4 in FR. philippensis are subspinous in all their parts. Size of the largest specimen, which is cup-shaped (fig. 1), 2 inches high, and 2-5; inches by 1% inch wide at the orifice ; cup 1 inch deep, with thick rounded margin. Longest hair-like locks of anchoring-spicules 6 inches. Size of ovo- Slater specimen 14 by 14 inch in its greatest diameters. ize of the three other specimens, which are younger, globular, and linked together by the hair-like locks of the largest (as in figs. 1 & 2, f), different, probably in accordance with their ages respectively. Hab. Marine. Loc. Cebu, Philippine Islands. Obs. The hexactinellid character of the spicules of this sponge, coupled with its four-hooked anchoring-spicule (no. 2) as described in the last species, at once proves it to be a Ros- sella; and the absence of the crucially headed veil-spicule from the surface of the body generally (that is, the absence of the “veil’’), whose presence is so characteristic of 2. antarctica and &. velata, further proves it to be the 2. philippensis of Dr. Gray. To this we might add the much greater develop- ment in size and length of the groups of anchoring-spicules, the absence of spines on the arms of the large crucially headed structural mhtetles of the body, and the absence, for the most part, of the outer and inner arm of the latticework sexradiate a of the surface, thus leaving the four horizontal ones alone developed ; while the absence of the erect fringe of spi- cules around the aperture, whose presence is so characteristic of F. antarctica, further distinguishes it from that species. It is not improbable that the “cup-like form” above de- scribed and figured (Pl. X. fig. 1) has had its cavity and shape worn down, and has become moditied generally into its present condition from a younger and more globular form with contracted aperture, somewhat like fig. 2; while, so far as these changes go, there may be similar differences between the older and younger forms also of R. antarctica ; but although such may be thus anticipated, I am not, from the few speci- mens from which I have had to write my descriptions, able to make the statement with certainty. In studying the Spongida it will be found that the general form so often varies, that alone it is not to be depended on as 120 Mr. H. J. Carter on the Genus Rossella. a specific distinction, any more than the same complement of spicules is always accompanied by the same form of sponge: thus, two sponges may be almost undistinguishable in their eneral forms, and yet, after all, be totally different in the forms of their spicules respectively. Hence the necessity of examining every specimen of sponge microscopically before we decide on its specific characters. As in R. antarctica, so here we have younger specimens of R. philippensis (fig. 2) growing upon the hair-like locks of the older ones (fig. 1, f), but much larger in dimensions, similar to those noticed in the concluding part of my descrip- tion, which suggested to Dr. Gray the name of “Psetalia glo- bulosa”’ (J. c.). But whether originating in ova or pullulation I am, as above stated with reference to the minute ones on R. antarctica, unable to determine. Lastly, it might be observed generally that although the hooked extremities of the anchoring-spicules have been for the most part torn off, there are many among them, especially coming from the upper part of the sponge, which naturally have never had any, but have always been fine-pointed. Rossella velata, Wyville Thomson (‘ The Depths of the Sea,’ p. 418). General form ovoid, hollow ; truncate and open at the upper, closed at the lower end. Avperture subcircular, slightly widen- ing inwards from a thin margin to a cavity of much the same shape as the areer itself externally. Sessile or fixed by anchoring-spicules. Colour brownish grey. External surface uniformly net-like and monticular, resting on a widely cancel- lated structure below, and covered by the latticework spicular layer above, which is again surmounted by three forms of appendicular spicules, whose relative positions and forms will be described hereafter. Internal surface or that of the cavity, the structure of the body or wall, and that of the latticework layer the same as in both the foregoing species. Pores and vents respectively the same in form and situation. Monticules of the surface round or boss-like, looking like so many stelliform eminences regularly linked together by interradiating lines. Spicules of three kinds, viz. appendicular, structural, and flesh-spicules. A. Appendicular of three forms, viz. 1, pointed at each extremity, and 2, four-hooked at the free end (like nos. 1 and 2 in &. antarctica respectively), associated, scantily scattered over the upper part of the body in small groups issu- ing from the summits of the boss-like eminences, becoming more numerous towards the lower part, where they attain Mr. H. J. Carter on the Genus Rossella. 121 their maximum size, length, and density—average length 3} inches: 8. crucially headed, like no. 3 in &. antarctica and similarly situated (that is, issuing from the summits of the monticular or boss-like eminences), but larger and more nu- merous, averaging in the length of the shaft 7-12ths, and in that of the arms 6-12ths of an inch respectively. 3B. Struc- tural spicules of the body and latticework layer, the same as in R. antarctica. c. Flesh-spicules, the same as those in 2. philippensis. Size of entire specimen 2,%, by 2 inches in its greatest diameters ; aperture 8-12ths of an inch wide ; cavity 14 inch deep. Hab. Marine. Loc. Atlantic Ocean-bed, north-west of the Shetland Islands, Obs. The specimen of &. velata from which the above description has been taken is that figured by Prof. Thomson in his ‘ Depths of the Sea’ (p. 418). It came to me and not labelled; but in a jar numbered “ 65,” received also at the same time, there are, among other sponges, three fragments of R. velata, which, according to the position of the station which is indicated by this no. (viz. about 80 miles north-west of the Shetland Islands), must have been dredged up in 345 fathoms. Nothing, however, can give a better idea of the sponge, except seeing it, than the representation to which I have alluded ; and therefore it will not be here repeated. R. velata differs from R&. antarctica in the absence of the erect fringe of spicules round the aperture, and, of course, in not possessing that form of rosette or flesh-spicule which is peculiar to the latter. It differs from 2. philippensis in pos- sessing the covering of veil-spicules, whose crucially armed heads form by intercrossing with each other an external en- velope common to both &. antarctica and LR. velata, as well as in the absence of the peculiar form of rosette in R. antarctica. From R. philippensis it also differs in possessing the stelli- form boss-like surface, and in the absence of the mammiform prolongations of the body with the large hair-like locks of anchoring-spicules that issue from them respectively, which are equally absent in &. antarctica (Pl. X. figs. 1 & 4); lastly, in having for the most part the outer and inner arm of the sexradiate spicule of the latticework dermal layer developed as in R. antarctica, together with a profusion of veil-like spicules, with probably other minor differences, which being merely in degree do not merit further mention here, although generally they indicate, from their delicate nature when compared with the other species, the quiet habitat in which 2. velata has been developed. 122 Mr. H. J. Carter on the Genus Rossella. General Observations. The essential differences between the species of Rossella above described are as follows :— R. antarctica differs from the other two in possessing an erect fringe of stout jaa round the aperture and the peculiar form of rosette flesh-spicule above described. R. philippensis differs from R. antarctica and R. velata in not possessing the monticular or boss-like surface, together with the veil-like covering of crucially headed spicules, but in lieu thereof probably the mammiform prolongations of the body with the large hair-like locks of anchoring-spicules issuing from them respectively. R. velata differs from R. antarctica in not having the form of rosette peculiar to the latter, and from R. philippensis in possessing the veil-like covering of crucially headed spicules. EXPLANATION OF PLATE X. Fig. 1. Rossella philippensis, Gray, old individual, natural size; cup- like and much worn: a, body; 666, mammiform prolongations of the body; eccce, hair-like locks of long anchoring-spicules issuing from the prolongations ; d, cavity or cup-like excavation of the body; ee, pit-like depressions on the surface of the same ; f, hair-like lock of spicules on which a young individual of the same species has become developed. Fig. 2. The same, young specimen which has become developed on the hair-like lock of fig. 1, f, natural size: a, body; 6, aperture ; ec, mammiform prolongations of the body supporting the hair- like locks of spicules respectively. Fig. 8. Form of free end of the anchoring-spicule characteristic of the genus Zossella. Fig. 4. Rossella antarctica, Carter, natural size, from’ the largest of two specimens dredged up by Sir J. Ross in 743° south latitude : a, body ; 6b, external or veil-like covering composed of crucially headed spicules; ¢, erect fringe of spicules round the aperture ; dd, anchoring-spicules of the lower extremity; ee, dotted line indicating the shape of the cavity. Fig. 5. The same, apertural end: a, aperture. Fig. 6. Form of rosette or flesh-spicule peculiar to R. antarctica: a, arms subspined ; 6, four-rayed head; ¢, six-rayed head; d, end of a single ray, more magnified, to show that it is capitate and micro- spined over the shaft. Fig. 7. R. antarctica, “pappiform rosette,” magnified to the same scale as the foregoing, viz. 1-12th to 1-6000th of an inch, to show their sizes relatively : a, arms of the rosette; , head of one arm with rays. N.B. For convenience only one head of rays has here been inserted. On Species of Hippothoa and Alecto. 123 XV.—Descriptions of Species of Hippothoa and Alecto from the Lower Silurian twee of Ohio, with a Description of Aulopora arachnoidea, Hall, By H. ALLEYNE NICHOLSON, M.D., D.Sc., F.R.S.E., Professor of Biology in the College of Physical Science, Newcastle-on-Tyne *. [Plate XI.] THE fossils upon which the following communication is founded were in the first place kindly submitted to me for examination and description by Mr. U. P. James, of Cincinnati, an ac- aapeshed and experienced observer, and a studious worker in the richly fossiliferous Silurian strata of the State of Ohio. Subsequently I had the opportunity of visiting Ohio personally, and I obtained a large additional series of these forms at Cin- cinnati and at Waynesville. They constitute a small group of organisms which may be advantageously considered to- gether, though differing considerably in their nature. The first of them is the Alecto inflata of Hall, which is an un- doubted Polyzoon, though certainly referable to another genus. I have examined very carefully a number of beautifully pre- served specimens, and am able to give a more complete descrip- tion of its characters than has yet been published. Three species (viz. A. frondosa, A. auloporoides, and A. confusa) appear to me to be undoubted examples of Alecto, and they all would seem to be new. Lastly, I have appended a descrip- tion of Aulopora arachnoidea, Hall, because this form, whilet seeming to be a genuine Awlopora, presents certain striking points of resemblance to Alecto auloporoides, with which it might readily be confounded. 1. Hippothoainflata, Hall. Pl. XI. figs. 1, 1a. Alecto inflata, Hall, Pal. N. Y. vol. i. p.77, pl. xxvi. figs. 7 a, 7 0. Polyzoary creeping, adnate, branched, and forming a close but irregular network. Branches linear ; cells uniserial, pyri- form, each springing by a contracted base directly from the cell below ; about four cells in the space of one line. Cell- mouths smaller in diameter than the expanded end of the cell, subterminal, and placed more or less distinctly on the front face of the cell. Though in some respects resembling some of the species of Alecto, iT think there can be no hesitation in referring this beautiful species to the genus Hippothoa, with which it agrees * Communicated by the Author, having been read at the meeting of the British Association at Belfast, before Section C. 124 Dr. H. A. Nicholson on Species in the form and mode of growth of the cells, and in the posi- tion of the cell-mouths. It is very readily distinguished from the following forms by the fact that the cells are not at all immersed, by the fact that each cell springs directly from another, by the cells being strictly uniserial, and by the posi- tion of the cell-mouth on the front face of the swollen cell. The cells are distinctly pyriform in shape, attenuated below, with a smooth surface, the aperture being orbicular or oval and destitute of notches or spines. The network formed by the polyzoary is usually a very close one, the branches being given off from the sides of the cells, usually at intervals of from half a line to two thirds of a line. All the examples of this species which I have seen are parasitic upon Strophomena alternata, Conrad. Hall’s speci- mens are from the Trenton Limestone ; but there can be no question as to their identity with ours. Locality and Formation —Abundant in the Cincinnati Group (Hudson-River Formation) near Cincinnati, Ohio. 2. Alecto auloporoides, Nicholson. Pl. XI. figs. 2-2 b. Polyzoary creeping, adnate, of narrow branches, which divide at various angles and repeatedly inosculate, so as to give rise to a complicated network, the meshes of which are more or less elliptical, and have a long diameter of one line more or less. The branches vary in width from one fifth to one third of a line. Cells tubular, partially immersed, free towards their apertures, sometimes uniserial, more commonly arranged in two alternating rows, sometimes irregularly disposed at the oints of anastomosis of the branches; from five to six cells in the space of one line in the narrower branches. Cell- apertures terminal, circular, of the same diameter as the tube, the last portion of the cell being more or less conspicuously decane above the general surface. Surface apparently smooth. The Ohio paleontologists appear to regard this as being the Aulopora arachnoidea of Hall; and, indeed, it seems probable that Hall included this under his species. ‘This, however, is an undoubted Alecto; and I think the name of Aulopora arachnoidea ought to be restricted to the form which I shall shortly describe under this name—a form which is very similar in general appearance to Alecto auloporoides, and occurs with it in the same beds, but which seems certainly to be an Aulopora, and is at any rate specifically distinct from the present fossil. Alecto auloporoides is very nearly allied to A. frondosa, ——— of Hippothoa and Alecto. 125 James, from which it is distinguished mainly by its more slender habit and graceful form, and by its generally having its cells arranged in a double or single series, Also, I have not hitherto been able to make out in the texture of A. aulo- porotdes the minute pores which seem to be present in all perfect examples of A. frondosa. Locality and Formation.—Cincinnati Group, Cincinnati, Ohio. ‘The species is a common one, and is found upon Strophomena alternata, Conrad, and Streptelasma corniculum, Hall. 3. Alecto frondosa, James. Pl. XI. figs. 3-3 d. Aulopora frondosa, James. Named, but not figured or described, in the ‘Catalogue of the Lower Silurian Fossils of the Cincinnati Group,’ 1871. Polyzoary creeping, adnate, of reticulating and anastomosing branches, which usually become more or less completely con- fluent so as to give rise to a thin expanded crust, or which are partially reticulated and partially confluent. When the branches form a network, the size of the meshes, as well as their disposi- tion, is exceedingly variable ; but they are usually more or less oval, with a long diameter of half a line to a line or more, the interspaces between them varying from half a line to two lines. The cells are uniserial on the narrowest branches, but biserial, triserial, or multiserial on other parts of the ccencectum ; elongated and tubular, immersed below, but free towards their sae the terminal portion of the tube being more or less elevated above the general surface. Cells from six to eight in the space of one line. Cell-mouths terminal, circular, of the same diameter as the tube. Entire surface, in well pre- served specimens, minutely porous. There does not appear to be any reason for doubting that this is a true Alecto. It is nearly allied to A. auloporoides, especially as regards the form of the cells; but the greater width of the branches and their common coalescence into ex- panded crusts, together with the greater number of the rows of cells over most portions of the ccencecium, communicate to the fossil quite a peculiar appearance, and appear to be cha- racters of specific value. Since my original description of this species, founded on type specimens furnished me by Mr. James, was written (in the Report on the Fossil Corals, Polyzoa, and Sponges of the State of Ohio, now in course of publication), I have examined a large suite of specimens which I collected myself at Cincinnati. These enable me to assert that, in all well-preserved examples, the entire surface of the polyzoary is covered with the apertures of exceedingly 126 Dr. H. A. Nicholson on Species small circular tubes, rendering it minutely porous (Pl. XI. fig. 3d). The examples of A. frondosa which have come under my observation are most commonly attached to the valves of Strophomena alternata, S. planumbona, and Orthis occidentalis ; but I have also seen the crusts growing on Chetetes fron- dosus and C. mammulatus. Locality and Formation —Hnudson-River Group (Lower Silurian), Cincinnati and Waynesville, Ohio. The specimens figured are reticulated examples, and are not so characteristic as the expanded and confluent forms. 4. Alecto confusa, Nicholson. Pl. XI. fig. 4. Polyzoary adnate, forming thin crusts which envelop foreign bodies. Cells tubular, multiserial, arranged in regular trans- verse rows, immersed towards their bases, free and elevated above the surface towards their apertures. Cell-mouths cir- cular, terminal, as large as the diameter of the tube, about five in the space of one line. All the examples of this species that I have seen are para- sitic upon the columns of Crinoids, which they closely embrace and incrust ; and they might readily be referred to Awlopora, unless care were exercised. The species is nearly allied in essentials to the two preceding, but is distinguished by its constantly forming thin crusts, and by its larger, more closely and irregularly arranged, and more prominent cells. Locality and Formation.—Cincinnati Group, Cincinnati, Ohio. Collected by Mr. U. P. James. 5. Aulopora arachnoidea, Hall. Pl. XI. figs. 5, 5a. Aulopora arachnoidea, Hall, Pal. N. Y. vol. i. p. 76, pl. xxvi. figs. 6 a-6c, Corallum very slender and delicate, attached to the surface of foreign bodies, repeatedly branching, and in many examples anastomosing to form a network. The branches are usually given off at intervals of from one third to two thirds of a line, and are very narrow and linear, not exceeding one fifth of a line in width. The corallites have much the form and cha- racter of the cells of the uniserial forms of Alecto, being in- variably arranged in single lines and opening in the axis of the branches. The terminal portion of the corallite is elevated above the surface; and the calices are circular and not ex- pe About four or five calices occupy the space of one ine. of Alecto and Aulopora. 127 Some examples of this species are branched with tolerable regularity, as in the specimen figured ; but others form com- pressed and closely interlaced reticulations. No positive or absolutely definite characters can be stated which would lead to the reference of this fossil to Awlopora rather than to Alecto. Nevertheless the general aspect of the fossil is such that it can almost positively be placed under the former genus. The forms to which it presents the nearest alliance are A. filiformis, Billings, and A. d) canadensis, Nich., both of which are De- vonian ; but it is readily distinguished from these, and by no character more conspicuously than by the fact that the corallites open in the axis of the branches, instead of making an angle with the main stems. With a little care, also, there is no great difficulty in separating it from Alecto auloporoides, to which it presents a very considerable superficial resemblance. The examples of Aulopora arachnoidea described by Hall are from the Trenton Limestone; but ours are from a higher horizon. The specimens which I have seen are all attached parasitically to the surface of different species of Chetetes (Monticulipora). Locality and Formation.—Cincinnati Group, Cincinnati and Waynesville, Ohio. EXPLANATION OF PLATE XI, Fig. 1. Hippothoa inflata, Hall, sp.,a small fragment, greatly enlarged. 1 a. Two of the cells of the same, still further enlarged. Fig. 2. Alecto auloporoides, Nich., a portion of the polyzoary growing on Strophomena alternata, greatly enlarged. 2a. Portion of a branch of the same, still further enlarged, showing the biserial cells. 26. Portion of another branch, in which the cells are uniserial below and biserial above. Fig. 3. Alecto frondosa, James, a reticulated example, of the natural size, growing on Strophomena alternata. 3a. Portion of the same, enlarged. 36. Portion of the same, still further enlarged. 3c. Portion of the polyzoary of another specimen, enlarged. 3d. Portion of another specimen, enlarged, showing the minutely orous nature of the surface. Fig. 4. Alecto confusa, Nich., forming a crust on a crinoidal column, enlarged. Fig. 5. ae arachnoidea, Hall, a specimen in which the branching is regular and no close reticulation is formed, growing on Chetetes gracilis, of the natural size and enlarged. 5a. Portion of a branch of the same, greatly enlarged. 128 Mr. W. Ferguson on a new XVI.—Deseription of a supposed new Genus of Ceylon Batrachians. By W. Frrauson, F.L.8.* TRACHYCEPHALUS. Fingers and toes tapering, very slightly webbed. Lower jaw with marked but not prominent apophyses, with a small fang-like process in the centre; the internal openings of the nostrils and Eustachian tubes small; tympanum small, but conspicuous. Small parotoids present? ‘The transverse pro- cesses of the sacral region dilated. (Maxillary and vomerine teeth present.) Vomer with two separate toothed prominences. A toothed prominence on each side between the choane and the jaw. The upper eyelid well developed, but not prominent. A cutaneous fold between the fore and hind limbs. Trachycephalus ceylanicus. Head very broad, much depressed, and very short im pro- portion to its breadth, the upper lip having a marked rim all along it, forming nearly a section of a circle, somewhat convex in front; the whole of the upper part of the head, including the eyelids and the tympanic region, covered with small, irregular, granular tubercles. Snout considerably pointed, with its extremity prominent and perpendicularly truncated, and very slightly overreaching the cleft of the mouth. Canthus rostralis obtuse ; loreal region concave, with a smooth groove running through it from the lower part of the orbit to the nostril. Occiput deeply concave. Nostril slightly below the extreme end of the canthus rostralis and the snout. Eye of moderate size, prominent, but concealed from above by the eyelid. Tympanum distinct, one half as large as the eye. A linear fold runs from the hinder edge of the orbit over the tympanum towards the armpit. Cleft of the mouth twice as broad as long; tongue not large, broadly but not deeply notched behind, attached to the gullet nearly its whole length. There is a toothed prominence on each side of the vomer, a little lower than the openings of the nostrils, and running in a straight line across the jaw. Vomerine teeth on long ised gradually rising from the inner angle of the choanz, running back and convergent behind, terminating in toothed promi- nences. Skin of the back, belly, throat, legs, and inside of fore limbs smooth. The whole of the upper part of the head (including the eyelids), the front of the fore limbs, and a re- * From the ‘Journal of the Ceylon Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society,’ 1874, Part 1. Communicated by the Author. Genus of Ceylon Batrachians. 129 markable cutaneous expansion on the side of the trunk between the fore and hind limbs covered with granule-like tubercles, with a few smaller ones on the tympanum. The smooth ee of the skin of the back is separated from the rough ead by a somewhat elevated ridge, caused by a depression of the head, and running in a line across just behind the orbits, and continued into the linear fold behind the tympanum, a good deal like that in the adult Rana Kuhlii figured by Dr. Giinther, ‘Indian Reptiles,’ t. xxvi. fig. A. Limbs of moderate length ; the length of the body two tenths of an inch longer than the distance of vent from heel. he third finger is about one tenth of an inch longer than the fourth, which is slightly longer than the second; these three fingers form a palmated group in advance of the first, and are very slightly webbed. First finger about half the length of the third. Metatarsus with a small tubercle below the first toe. The fourth toe (including the metatarsus) is exactly one half the length of the body; the third toe is slightly longer than the- fifth ; a very short web between the first, second, third, and fourth toes only ; the fifth appears to be quite free. Upper parts (in spirits) dark brown, with lighter-coloured spots ; outer parts of hind and fore limbs clouded with brown ; inner sides and the cutaneous expansion coloured dark grey, with small brown spots; belly dark livid colour; throat suf- fused with brown. The following are the dimensions of the only specimen in my possession—length of body 1°8, vent to heel 1°6, hind limbs 2-8, fourth toe (including the metatarsus) 0°9 inches. I do not know any frog with which to compare this one in its general appearance and character. It is one of a few set aside from my collection by Major Beddome, when on a visit to Colombo lately, and pronounced by that gentleman to be new to science, and which, from a feeling of delicacy, he declined to accept from me. In searching for its place in the synoptical list of the characters of the genera of Batrachians given in page 400 of Giinther’s work on Indian Reptiles, I felt that it could scarcely be removed from the first division, 4, of the group of Ground-Frogs; and it seemed most closely allied to the genus Xenophrys, of which one species, X. monti- cola, is described and figured by Giinther in the work referred to, p. 414, and plate xxvi. fig. H. : In the generic and specific descriptions which I have given for this supposed new, Ceylon frog, I have followed the exact order of Dr. Giinther’s description of the Indian frog above referred to, to facilitate comparisons between the two. The generic descriptions of Xenophrys and Trachycephalus ' Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Ser. 4. Vol. xv. 9 130 Mr. W. Ferguson on a new Genus of Batrachians. (rough head) are in ‘many respects so similar that it is not unlikely the former may be so amended as to include the Ceylon frog; but the very distinct aspects of the two, and some remarkable differences more fully given in the specific description, have induced me to include our Ceylon frog in a new genus with a name indicating its singular rough head. In page 85 of the ‘ Proceedings of the Asiatic Society of Bengal’ for March 1870, the late Dr. Jerdon, in the following extract from his “‘ Notes on Indian Herpetology,” has shown that vomerine teeth are present in the genus Xenophrys :—“ I obtained numerous specimens of Xenophrys monticola, Giinther, both at Darjeeling and the Khasi hills ; it has distinct vomerine teeth, which Giinther was unable to detect in the specimens of the British Museum. [ also obtained five specimens of a larger species of Xenophrys both in Sikim and the Khasi hills, which I propose describing as Xenophrys gigas.” It is very likely that, if these specimens of the undescribed species referred to exist, it may be found that they have pecu- liarities of structure connecting them with Xenophrys monticola, Giinther, and our Ceylon frog. I regret to say that I have only one specimen of this supposed new frog, and that I am not certain as to where it was found, though I believe I caught it on the sides of a stream near Hewisse, in the southern portion of the Western Province, and famous as one of Mr. Thwaites’s best botanical districts. I regret also to state that, like many of the earlier frogs caught by me, thisone was put into strong spirits, which have shrivelled it up to acertainextent. It is very thin and flat in proportion to its size; and I doubt not that, like species of Hylorana, it is a powerful leaper. In the specific description given I have tried not to omit a single character which might assist in the identification of this frog. The interdigital membrane connecting the first, second, third, and fourth toes is just perceptible; but I have no doubt that in newly caught specimens it will be found quite distinct. I have marked the presence of parotoids with a query, thus (?), because I am not certain whether the slight enlarge- ments behind the orbits are parotoids or not. Writing about Rana Kuhlit, Schl., of Ceylon, W. Theobald, junr., Esq., in his Catalogue of Reptiles in the Museum of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, makes the following very appro- priate remarks, which are eaneey applicable to all the Indian and Ceylon Batrachians and the Geckotide :—“ There are no reptiles in India in such a confused state as the Ranide; and I can add but little towards disentangling the shadowy species, real enough perhaps, but not as yet characterized. The series Mr. J. Wood-Mason on the Genus Deidamia. 131 in the Museum is a very poor one; and the Ranide from all parts of India must be assiduously collected before sound results can be obtained. Let us hope that an urgent appeal for frogs from all parts of India flid Ceylon, W. F.} will be liberally Merntailad to by local naturalists and collectors, with- out which aid the subject must long remain in its present un- satisfactory state. Hach contributor should not send merely the most conspicuous frogs from his neighbourhood, but all the species and varieties he can procure.”’ As an illustration of the liability to add to and perpetuate the confusion connected with some of the frogs oy other reptiles, | may refer to a rare Ceylon frog found first on Adam’s Peak several years ago by Dr. Schmarda, Professor of Zoology in the University of Prague. On a fly-sheet after pase 21 of the second part of Dr. Kelaart’s ‘ Prodromus of the aunz of Ceylon,’ published in 1853, this frog is very briefly described by the late Dr. Kelaart under the following name, “ Polypedates (?) Schmarda,n.s. nobis” —the “Schmarda” being no doubt a slip of the pen for “Schmardana,” under which latter name, and under the genus Jralus, Giinther refers to this then doubtful frog in his‘ Indian Reptiles,’ p. 433. Theobald, in his Catalogue referred to, p. 85, gives this frog as follows:— “ Polypedates smaragdinus, Kelaart; Ceylon. Eyebrows armed with spies. Limbs studded with tubercular sharp-pointed spines. A very peculiar species, and probably a distinct generic form.” Jerdon, in the paper referred to, pp. 83, 84, and Anderson, in his list of accessions to the collection of reptiles in the Indian Museum since 1865, refer distinctly to an Indian frog described by Blyth in footnote to p. 48 of Appendix to Kelaart’s ‘ Prod. Faun. Zeyl.’ as the Pilipedaies smaragdinus, found on the Khasi hills. The specitic name here means emerald-green ; and Mr. Theobald’s P. smaragdinus ought to have been P. Schmardana. On page 85 of the ‘Annals and Magazine of Natural History’ for January 1872, containing “ Descriptions of some Ceylonese Reptiles and Batrachians”’ by Dr. Giinther, this frog is finally, and I suppose properly, named, though not yet described, as Lxalus Schmar- danus (Kelaart). XVII.—On the Genus Deidamia, v. W.-S. By JAmeEs Woop-Mason, of Queen’s College, Oxford. ArT the last meeting of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, held on the 5th of August last, I drew attention to the fact that a Crustacean precisely similar in general structure to several # 132 Mr. J. Wood-Mason on the Genus Deidamia. lately discovered by the ‘Challenger,’ and upon which Dr. v. Willemoes-Suhm (one of the naturalists to the expedition) had bestowed the name Deidamia, had long before been de- scribed by Professor Camil Heller under the name of Polycheles typhlops. In this remarkable Crustacean the organs of vision are morphologically entirely wanting, just as in Detdamia, the position of the eye-stalks being merely indicated by two soall black specks. The name Deidamia having been held to be inadmissible *, as having been already employed for a valid genus in another division of Arthropoda, and Willemoesta substituted for it upon the daring Pi as it seems to me, dangerous assumption that every animal dredged up from so vast a depth as were the Deitdamie would prove generically different from every thing previously described, I have thought it worth while to translate, for publication in the ‘Annals and Magazine of Natural History,’ Professor Heller’s later and more methodical account of his wonderful blind Crustacean from the Mediterranean. The conclusions that I have arrived at, after a most careful study of Heller’s figures and descriptions in comparison with those published in Prot. Wyville Thomson’s Reports, are :— 1. That the three species Polycheles typhlops, Deidamia leptodactyla, and D. crucifer cannot be placed in any existing family of crustaceans, recent or fossil, exeept perhaps the Eryonide, the structural characters of which are too incom- pletely known at present to admit of their being included nm it. 2. That the three species in question belong naturally to one and the same family. 3. That they cannot be distinguished from one another even generically. I therefore beg to propose for them a new family name, and to regard all three as members of its single genus Polycheles, as follows :— Fam. nov. Polychelide. Genus unic. POLYCHELES, Heller. a. With the four anterior pairs of walking-legs didactyle. Species 1. Polycheles typhlops, Heller. 2. erucifer, v. W.-S. b. With all the walking-legs didactyle. 3. Polycheles leptodactyla, vy. W.-S. * ‘Nature,’ 1873, vol. viii. p. 485; 1874, vol. ix. p. 182. Mr. J. Wood-Mason on the Genus Deidamia. 133 The following is a translation of pp. 209-212 of Professor Heller’s work *, entitled ‘Die Crustaceen des siidlichen Europa’ (Vienna, 1863). Genus PoLycne es, C. Heller, Sitzungsberichte der kais. Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien, Bd. xlv. Abth. i. p. 389. Integument thin. Cephalothorax longish quadrangular, in front and behind moderately tapering, above quite level from before backwards, and slightly convex from side to side : the fore margin hollowed out, the two lateral angles pointed ; between these and the middle line, behind the insertion of the imner antenne, on each side a triangular notch; the lateral borders sharp, tolerably straight, the hinder border deeply emarginate. The cervical furrow on the upper surface distinct. Kyes rudimentary. Antenne of moderate length, the external ones inserted below and internal to the inner. Peduncle of the inner (upper) antennze flattened ; the first joint very broad, and provided on the inner side with a long spme directed for- wards; the two succeeding joints short; of the two flagella the inner long, the outer short. Peduncle of the outer an- tenn somewhat longer than that of the inner; the short tri- angular basilar joint armed at the anterior extremity with a small spine; the two succeeding joints tolerably long and narrow ; the flagella considerably shorter than the whole animal: the leaf-shaped appendage, which proceeds outwards from the basilar joint, narrow, thickly fringed with hairs on the margins, shorter than the peduncle. ‘lhe external max- illipeds small and slender, somewhat shorter than the peduncle of the lower antenne, six-jointed, externally without palps ; the palp is likewise wanting in the second pair of maxillipeds. The first pair of maxillipeds is much elongated; in other respects formed just as in Scyl/arus. Sternum narrow ; the legs very closely approximated at their bases. The first four pairs of legs didactyle, and the last only terminated by a simple claw. The anterior much longer, though but little stouter, than the succeeding pairs, their several joints strongly compressed ; the finger long, straight, and slender ; the slight terminal claws strongly bent inwards. The hind body longer than the cephalothorax, at its base almost as broad as this, gradually tapering posteriorly, the upper surface arched from side to side; the strongly detlexed lateral processes tolerably broad and rounded off, especially those of the second segment. The fan-shaped caudal swimmeret well developed ; its median * For figures vide plate vi. 134 Mr, J. Wood-Mason on the Genus Deidamia. plate brought to a point posteriorly ; its lateral plates oval almost equal in pes to the former, the outer ones not divided into two halves by a transverse line. Five pairs of abdominal appendages are present in the male ; those of the first segment are slender, with a single spirally coiled terminal wi on the succeeding ones two long, narrow, terminal plates are always present ; on the second, indeed, even a third accessory inner plate is added ; the basilar joint is much elongated, but gradually diminishes in length backwards. This species agrees in the general form of its body with the Scyllaride, from which, however, it is essentially distinguished by the different form of its antennee, and by its didactyle legs, as well as by its narrow sternum. With the Astacide it has nothing in common, beyond the lamellar appendage at the base of the outer antenne and the didactyle feet, but isin other respects perfectly different in structure from them. The genus conforms most nearly to the fossil crayfish (Hryon Cuvierit) from the Solenhofen Slates, described by Desmarest, in that in this latter also a flattened cephalothorax, antennz, and legs of similar structure are found; the hind body, however, is in that species much narrower than the cephalothorax, and the lamellar appendage at the base of the outer antennee much enlarged. It forms with that extinct form a transitional group between the Scyllaridee (Loricata), on the one hand, and the Astacidee on the other. Polycheles typhlops, C. Heller, Beitriige zur niiheren Kenntniss der Macrouren, Sitzungsb. der Akad. der Wiss. 1862, Bd. xlv. p. 392, Taf. i. f. 1-6. The cephalothorax of this species measures 10 lines in length, in front 5, behind 5:4, and across the middle 6 lines in breadth. The lateral margins are tolerably sharp and distinctly toothed, especially towards the front, the lateral angles pro- jecting, with their points directed forwards and outwards. The flat upper surface is divided by a distinct, anteriorly concave cervical furrow, into an anterior and posterior moiety, the lateral extremities of the same bifurcated outwards into two branches running to the margins, and there enclosing a triangular lateral area. Along the middle there runs from before backwards a sharp toothed ridge; another shorter and weaker longitudinal ridge is found on each side on the hinder half of the cephalothorax, somewhat nearer to the lateral margins than to the middle line. Towards the front on each side lie four or five sharp teeth, one behind the other, in a slightly curved, inwardly convex line ; in addition, the whole Mr. A.G. Butler on the Agaristide. 135 upper surface is beset with minute rough tubercles. No distinct eyes are present ; at the base of the peduncle of the inner an- tenn, on each side, one perceives simply a small roundish black speck as the indication of an organ of vision. The peduncles of the antenne are tolerably hairy, the internal spine of the peduncle of the inner antenne longer than the ge itself. The anterior legs are very long, and when aid backwards reach beyond the caudal swimmeret: their several joints much compressed, the brachium 7°5, the ante- brachium 3°5, the carpus 4, the dactyli 5 lines long; the brachium and antebrachium beset with one or two small spines on their outer margins ; the hand is likewise provided on its upper and lower margins with some very fine teeth. The succeeding pairs of legs appear considerably shorter ; the hand, particularly of the third and fourth pairs of legs, almost pris- matic, quadrangular; the finger slender, slightly hairy ; the terminal joint of the fifth pair much shorter than the conical tarsus ; the coxa provided on its inner side with two roundish projecting scales, behind which lie the orifices of the male genital organs. The first abdominal segment is flat on its upper surface, the four succeeding furnished with a well- marked salient sharp median ridge, which is prolonged at the end of each segment into an acute anteriorly hamate and incurved spine; this spine is most highly developed on the fourth segment. The median ridge is but little indicated on the sixth segment, and bifureates anteriorly. The pointed triangular median plate of the caudal swimmeret roughly granulated at the base, provided with two ridges converging towards the tip on the hinder half. The plates of the swim- meret are all strongly ciliated on their margins. Length of the body 2 inches. A single male specimen of this interesting species, found in the Mediterranean near Sicily, exists in the Zoological Museum at Vienna. XVIII.—Notes on certain Genera of Agaristide, with Descrip- tions of new Species. By ARTHUR GARDINER BUTLER, | el Do A TS Se [Plate XIII. ] THE following notes I have made during my rearrangement of the Agaristid in the collection of the British Museum. The genera Hespagarista and Damias (part.), placed by Mr. Walker among the Castnii, are referable to the present family, 136 Mr. A. G. Butler on the Agaristide. as also are the genera Phasis, Massaga, and Psychomorpha, originally placed by him among the Melamerida and Litho- siidee. The genus Cocytia appears to me to be somewhat inter- mediate in character between the Agaristide and Zygenide ; the antenne are intermediate in character between Agarista and Coronis, in which respect it resembles Burgena (B. trans- ducta) : it will come best at the end of the Agaristide. Bois- duval erects a tribe, Cocytides, for its reception. The genera Phasis and Massaga were referred to their true pet in the first volume of Walker’s ‘Supplement’ (Lep. et. Suppl. p. 45); but at page 136 of the same volume he describes a species of Phasis under the family Melameride ; the type is now in the Museum collection, and is nearly allied to P. noctilux. Josia? separata and Josia? continua (Lep. Het. vii. pp. 1645, 1646) are referable to the same genus. The genus Psychomorpha is nearly allied to Alypia, but has pectinated antenne. Dr. Herrich-Schiiffer has unaccountably abandoned the type of Phagorista (P. agaristoides), an insect with pectinated an- tenne, applying the name to species of Walker’s genus Meta- garista; in this he has been followed by Walker (Lep. Het. vil. p. 1589, & Suppl. i. p. 59 & v. p. 1859) and Moore (P. Z.S. 1865, &c.). Walker’s genus must therefore be restored, and will contain the following species quoted in his Catalogue :—M. transiens (Husemia transiens, Walk.), M. bala (Pheg. bala, Moore), M. catocalina (Pheg. catocalina, Walk.), M. leucomela (Phag. leucomela, H.-Sch.), M. triphe- notdes (Phag. triphenoides, Walk.), M. longipennis (Catocala? longipennis, Walk.). The genus Callidula (Damias, part., Boisd.) is certainly not Agaristid; it appears to me to be better placed with the Melamerid ; Cleosiris would also come better with that group: the antenne in both of these genera are short and hair-like ; whereas the antenne of the typical Agaristide are generally long, and always thickened towards the extremity, as in many butterflies. The genus Arycanda, described by Mr. Walker under the Chalcostide (Lep. Het. Suppl. i. p, 123), was placed by him, in the Collection, next to Husemia*—a proceeding which may, I fear, have led others into error. What is, however, more unfortunate, is that it is structurally identical with the Lithosiid genus Tigridoptera, H.-Sch., which is again identical with the genus Panethia, Guenée, referred to the Geometridous family * Probably owing to its resemblance to his Lusemia mollis, which will have to be generically separated from Eusemia. Mr. A. G. Butler on new Species of Agaristide. 137 Zerenide. In fact Arycanda maculata, Walk., is closely allied to Panethia georgiata, Guenée; whilst Panethia pervasata, Walk., is perhaps no more than a variety of Tigridoptera exul of Herrich-Schiiffer. The following species are new :— Genus ViTHorA, Moore (allied to Hespagarista). Vithora agrionides, n. sp. Resembles Cystidia stratonice, Cramer, excepting in the body *. 3 ¢. Wings above black ; primaries with an interno- median patch cut by the median nervure, and terminating just before first median branch, a large blotch immediately beyond it, within the cell, and an angulated discal band, cut by six black nervures, subhyaline white ; secondaries with the basal third and a subangulated discal band, cut by six black nervures, subhyaline white. Body : thorax dark brown, laterally streaked with ochre-yellow in front, collar yellow: abdomen ochre- ellow, with a dorsal series of large dark brown spots and lateral series of narrow small spots; below ochre-yellow ; venter with two parallel series of large dark brown spots. Expanse of wings 2 inches 5 to 6 lines. Hakodadi (Whitely). Coll. B.M. Genus AGARISsTA, Leach. Before proceeding to describe new species in this genus, I wish to call attention to one or two points in Dr. Boisduval’s recent paper. Speaking of the genera Husemia and Alypia (p. 43), Dr. Boisduval says “ Nous les avons adoptés plutét comme di- visions que comme genres proprement dits.”’ It appears to me that he has not been careful in separating the species evidently referable to these “ divisions.” For instance, Agarista Rosenbergii, of Felder’s unpublished plates, is clearly almost as nearly allied to Agarista agricola as to A. milete, Cr.; yet Dr. Boisduval commences his genus Agarista with A. agri- cola, but places A. Rosenbergii as the 24th species of Husemia and between L. pallida, Walker, an undoubted Lusemia, and “* H. milete,” which is an Agarista. ‘The species which follow (EL. luctifera, fenestrata, semyron=chrysospila, Walk., and radians, n. 47) are all Agariste; the following I have not seen, but suspect that they also belong to the same group :— * I have to thank Mr. Stretch for calling my attention to Cramer's figure. Cystidia is probably a mimic of Vithora. 138 Mr. A. G. Butler on new Species of Agaristide. “ EF. conferta, n. 16” *; agrius, n. 31; pedasus, n. 325 zea, n. 34; pales, n. 35. Then, again, to proceed to more serious errors: —A. frontinus (n. 2) belongs to the Noctuide, and is identical with Ophiusa pyrrhargyra, & common and well-known species which comes in almost every Australian collection. A. ostorius (n. 3) also belongs to the Noctuide, and is the Modina ostorius of Walker’s list. Dr. Boisduval says it is “ trés-rare:” this may be the case; but there are four examples in the collection of the British Museum. A. alienata (n. 13) is one of the Catoca- line, and will probably form a new genus close to Ophideres. A, lincea (n. 23) is the bambucina of Eschscholtz; it comes only from the Philippines so far as I know; and A. linceoides (n. 25) is typical A. lincea; we have it from Ké and Ceram: these two, with the Husemda-mollis group, will form a new genus allied to Husemia. 1. Agarista polysticta, n. sp. 9. Allied to A. Lewini?, but smaller, shorter in the wing, the spots on basal area lighter and more numerous, four on costa (the two nearest to base minute), three increasing in size within the cell, and five (the second and fourth larger and oval) in a straight longitudinal line on interno-median area ; postcellular band more angulated, almost divided in the middle; discal series of dots obsolete, excepting near costa; submarginal dots larger, nearly white, seven in number; fringe at apex of primaries and round margin of secondaries white: body below less streaked with orange: primaries below with the discoidal spot close to the postcellular band (which is very irregular, as above): discal dots absent; submarginal dots greyish ; secon- daries with a small solitary whitish spot at origin of subcostal branches. Expanse of wings 1 inch 8 lines. Between Sydney and Moreton Bay (Damel). Type, B.M. Also allied to A. affinis and A. ephyra. 2. Agarista neptioides, n. sp. 9. Wings jet-black, fringe spotted with white; primaries with nine white spots arranged as in A. Donovant, but smaller ; no subapical diffused spots (as usual in that species) ; secon- daries with a very narrow central white bar, cut by the nervures, so that at its superior extremity it is divided into three unequal ovoid spots: head black, white-spotted; thorax * Unfortunately the British Museum does not possess a copy of Her- rich-Schiiffer’s ‘ Aeussereuropaische Schmetterlinge.’ Mr. A. G, Butler on new Species of Agaristide. 139 and base of abdomen black; remainder of abdomen bright orange, crossed by four black segmental lines: wings below the same as above, excepting that there is a nebulous subcostal greyish streak in primaries ; body below less black than above ; the femora orange. Expanse of wings 1 inch 11 lines. Port Albany, North Australia (Stevens). Type, B.M. Allied to, but very distinct from, A. Donovan; its black- and-white coloration makes it very similar to the butterflies in the N.-melicerta group of Neptis. Genus Evsemt1A, Dalman. Dr. Boisduval’s new species, L. Lambertiene (n. 3), of which he justly says that it is “sans contredit, l’une des plus belles du genre,” is identical with 2. bisma of Moore (n. 9). Dr. Boisduval gives Java as the habitat of EZ. amatrtx (n. 11), whereas the Javan species is his own . clymene (n. 30); if he refers to the ‘Oriental Entomology’ he will find that Westwood’s species comes from India. . emolliens (n. 17) will go with 1, mollis into a new genus. LE. saturata (n. 45) appears to be a Burgena; but I have failed to discover the type. .? egoceroides is identical with Metagarista transiens of Walker; and £.? sabulosa is a new species of the same genus. 1. Husemia silhetensis, n. sp. ?. Closely allied to the Nepalese EZ. victrix, but with the central pale yellow band of primaries more transverse, the two patches of which it is formed being placed exactly below one another; one discal subcostal white spot (sometimes obsolete) instead of three in a transverse series; blue marginal area of secondaries considerably broader; differences below much as above. Expanse of wings 3 inches 4 lines. Silhet (Doubleday & Argent). Two specimens, B.M. 2. Eusemia orientalis, n. sp. @. Nearly allied to LZ. victrix, much smaller; the central pale yellow band of primaries more irregular ; the discal white spots united into a quadrifid white bar; secondaries with the marginal blue area more purple in tint and much narrower: wings below purplish brown, the margins bluish; primaries with markings as above; secondaries with a diffused subapical orange spot. Expanse of wings 2 inches 6 lines. Mussooree (Leadbeater). Type, B.M. 140 Mr. A. G. Butler on new Species of Agaristide. We have a male and two females of the L. victrix of West- wood, all from Nepal; and as they agree entirely in pattern, I do not doubt that the two species described above from dif- ferent localities are distinct. 3. Lusemia nigripennis, n. sp. Like FE. adulatrix, but with the upper division of the central yellow band of primaries narrower, and the lowermost division much broader; the postcellular yellow spots larger ; the discal series of white spots reduced to minute points, and the orange subanal patch of secondaries reduced to a squamose dot. Expanse of wings 3 inches 2 lines, Ceylon (Templeton). Type, B.M. We have £. adulatrix from Nepal and N. India, and the pearly allied /. bellatrix from N. Bengal and Moulmein. 4, Eusemia nipalensis, n. sp. 3. Nearly allied to E. maculatrix of Silhet, but smaller, and differing in the larger and more angular four central yel- low spots of primaries, the brilliant orange (instead of dull deep-red) secondaries, and the bright orange abdomen with narrower transverse black bars: differences below as above. Expanse of wings 2 inches 10 lines. Nepal (Ramsay &c.). ‘Type, B.M. This beautiful species is certainly distinct. 5. Eusemia distincta, n. sp. Allied to the preceding, but differs in having the two inner yellow spots of primaries narrower and almost touching, and the two outer spots white instead of yellow. Expanse of wings 3 inches. Silhet (Doubleday). Type, B.M. Intermediate between EL. nipalensis and LE. trenea of Bois- duval: all three, as well as several examples of ZL. vetula, two ot E. communicans, and the following species, were united with £. maculatrix by Mr. Walker. 6. Eusemia communis, n. sp. Pl. XIII. fig. 1. Allied to 2. communicans (which is closely allied to the Bornean £. fasciatriz), but with the inner white (sometimes ochreous) bar always uregular, and almost invariably more or less interrupted* ; the outer white or ochreous bar dislocated, * The examples with ochreous or ochre-tinted band generally have it broken up into two small spots. Mr. A. G. Butler on new Species of Agaristide. 141 very narrow, often interrupted, sometimes almost linear; the discal series of white decreasing spots well marked: secon- daries reddish ochreous, similar to /. communicans; thorax | black ; head and tegule spotted with white; abdomen bright ochre-yellow, banded with black. Expanse of wings 2 inches 10 lines to 3 inches. Silhet (Sowerby & Stainsforth). Type, B.M. We have eight examples of this species; although rather variable as regards the transverse bands of primaries, they are all so similar that I have no doubt they represent but one species. 7. Eusemia villicoides, n. sp. Pl. XIII. fig. 2. Allied to E. vetula, but with the sulphur-yellow spots of primaries enormously enlarged, the three on basal area uniting mto one patch, enclosing two black spots (the upper one rounded within cell, the lower irregular, sometimes uniting with the black at base); the discal yellow spots placed one above the other and subquadrate ; submarginal spots as usual, the one at anal angle rather larger; base streaked with plum- baginous, an irregular discal line of the same colour: secon- daries orange instead of red; the internal fasciole broken up into two rounded black spots; two large subapical yellow spots upon the black margin: thorax broad and black, ptery- godes sulphur-yellow: abdomen orange, transversely barred with grey: wings below paler than above, the yellow spots still larger, so that almost the entire basal half of primaries is pale yellow; secondaries with four elongated apical and two small submarginal pale yellow spots. Expanse of wings 2 inches 6 lines. Hakodadi (Whitely). ‘Two specimens, B.M. 8. Husemia superba, n. sp. Pl. XIII. fig. 3. Allied to £. euphemia, much larger. Primaries with four white dots at the base of costa; two ochreous dots at base of cell ; a small ochfeous spot and a plumbaginous dot at base of interno-median interspace, and an ochreous interno-basal dot ; four large ochreous spots on basal area, one just before middle of cell, a second, larger, at end of cell, a third, elongated, oblique, crossing the middle of the internal nervure, a fourth, subquadrate, below base of first median branch; an ochreous spot at external angle; a large, ochreous subapical blotch ; several plumbaginous streaks between the ochreous spots; secondaries as in E. euphemia: thorax black, spotted in front with white: abdomen orange, banded with black: male with 142 Mr. A. G. Butler on new Species of Agaristide. a black anal tuft: primaries below black ; a white subcosta litura at base; a large ochreous spot near base of cell; a broad internal testaceous streak; an irregular transverse ochreous band; subanal spot and subapical spot as above: secondaries as above: body black, spotted wis white; legs black, varied with orange, and dotted with white. Expanse of wings 3 inches 2 lines. ¢, Zoolu (Angas); 9, Natal (Gueinzius). Type, B.M. The above is the 4. euphemia, var. 8, of Walker’s ‘ List.’ It and the two following may be at once distinguished from E. euphemia (irrespective of other characters) by the white- spotted prothorax ; in EL. euphemia the prothorax is orange, longitudinally streaked with black. 9. Eusemia africana, n. sp. Nearly allied to E. euphemia, from which it may be at once distinguished by the single large central ochreous spot on basal area, extending from the costal to the submedian nervure, and the white-spotted prothorax. Expanse of wings 2 inches 8 lines. &, D’Urban, Feb. 1867 (Zrimen); 3 2 , Natal ( Guetinzius & Gooch); 3, Zoolu (Angas). Type, B.M. The example from Zoolu is rather smaller than the Natal form. This species is the EH. ewphemia, var. y, of Walker’s ‘List,’ and is the southern representative of that species, which we have from the coast of Guinea, Ashanti, and the White Nile. 10. Husemia ochracea, n. sp. 9. Allied to £. ewphemia, but smaller; the wings shorter ; the subbasal spots of primaries broader; the subapical elon- gated spot rather nearer to the apex, and not notched internally; the secondaries bright ochreous, with the usual black border ; the prothorax dotted with white. Expanse of wings 2 inches 2 lines. Congo (Richardson). Type, B.M. : I have seen the male of this species in Mr. Stretch’s col- lection; it is the EZ. ewphemia, var. e, of Walker’s List.’ 11. Eusemia tricolor, n. sp. 9. Allied to Z. hesperoides: wings above dark brown; primaries with a central, oblique, creamy-whitish band, taper- ing from the subcostal nervure near end of cell to near the external angle, diffused internally from the median nervure Mr. A.G. Butler on new Species of Agaristide. 143 downwards, and slightly interrupted by the first and second branches ; apical fringe white ; secondaries with a broad tawny patch cmt aeniniig from the middle of the internal margin to the subcostal nervure, where it terminates in an obtuse point: thorax dark brown; a pale yellow fringe on the anterior margin of the collar: abdomen orange (much rubbed in the type); apical fringe white: wings below nearly as above ; body below dull ochreous. Iixpanse of wings 2 inches 10 lines. Sarawak (Wallace). Type, B.M. Possibly the female of /. hesperoides ; but the latter species has the central band of primaries shorter, broader, not diffused or interrupted ; the tawny orange patch in secondaries only extended to the origin of third median branch; the collar ochreous; the underside of the wings shot with purple and green; the body, costa of primaries, and a broad central dif- fused band bright orange. 12. Husemia pulchra,n. sp. Pl. XIII. fig. 4. @. Primaries above black; a broad oblique stramineous band from middle of costa to near external angle ; apical fringe white; secondaries deep reddish tawny, with the base and a broad external border black; fringe white: thorax black ; front of collar white: abdomen orange-tawny: primaries below dull black, shot with blue; veins brown ; central band broader than above, creamy white ; apical fringe white : secon- daries rather paler than above; base and outer margin shot with green and crossed by brown nervures: body ochreous. Expanse of wings 2 inches 9 lines. Muhrut, India (7. Walker). Type, B.M. This species was presented to the Collection by the Rev. F. Walker. 13. Husemia vittata, n. sp. Allied to £. Belangerti and E. Mooret. Primaries dark brown; a small elongate spot just below median nervure at basal fourth of wing, and a broad, rather irregular, postmedian oblique band from costal nervure to near external angle, sulphur-yellow ; cell transversely streaked with plumbaginous ; a transverse series of six plumbaginous spots just beyond the yellow band: secondaries salmon-colour; costal area brown ; a central subcostal spot, touching the costal area, and a deep] excavated broad marginal border dark brown: thorax dark brown ; antenne silvery whitish; abdomen ochreous, barred with black : wings below paler than above ; primaries without 144 Mr. A. W. E. O'Shaughnessy on plumbaginous spots or streaks, the small yellow spot replaced by a pale brown one; interno-basal area pale silky brown ; secondaries orange, with a broad irregular costal and external brown border: thorax brown; abdomen ochreous, narrowly transversely barred with black. Expanse of wings 2 inches 2 lines. Java (Horsfield). Type, B.M. At once distinguished from its allies by the I markings and yellow dot on primaries, and the subcostal brown spot of secondaries. Family Cocytiide. ( Cocytides, Boisd.) Genus CocyTiA, Boisd. 1. Cocytia chlorosoma, n. sp. 3. Nearly allied to C. Durvillet 3, but smaller, shorter in the wing, with the palpi slightly shorter, antenne and legs more slender, the black margins of the wings considerably narrower, the internervular folds much less strongly blackened, the orange spot at base of primaries about one fourth the size ; a small yellow tuft above the anus. Expanse of wings 3 inches 1 line. Aru (Wallace). Type, B.M. I have no doubt that this is a distinct species. EXPLANATION OF PLATE XIII. Fig. 1. Eusemia communis (spotted ochre-tinted form), p. 140. n. 6. Fig. 2. —— villicoides, p. 141. n. 7. Fig. 3. —— superba, p. 141. n. 8. Fig. 4. —— pulchra, p. 145. n. 12. XIX.—Descriptions of new Species of Gobiide in the Collection of the British Museum. By A. W. E. O’SHauaungssy, Assistant in the Natural-History Departments. Gobius Burton, sp. n. D. 6;: A.}. L. lat. 38. The height of the body is one seventh of the total length; the length of the head is comprised four times and a half in the same. Head flattened, broader than high ; snout slightly _ new Species of Gobiide. 145 longer than the diameter of the eye, which is rather more than one fifth of the length of the head. Head naked; small scales on nape. No canines, but the outer series of the teeth enlarged. Upper pectoral rays not silk-like. Ventral rather narrow and tubular, not reaching quite to the vent ; pectorals reaching slightly beyond the ventrals, to the vent. Reddish brown, becoming paler on the lower parts of the body; head covered with mall black spots and dots ; a longitudinal lateral dark brown band from within the axil of the pectoral to the caudal. One specimen, in the collection of the British Museum, from Fernando Po, was collected by Capt. Burton, after whom it is named. Length 33 inches. Gobius castaneus, sp. n. D.75 A. LL. lat. 70-72. The height of the body is one sixth, the length of the head one fourth, of the total length. Head as broad as high, naked, as well as the nape in one specimen, in the other a few scales in front of the dorsal. Scales small. Interorbital space a little less than the diameter of the eye, which is one fifth of the length of the head. Snout as nia as the eye; cleft of the mouth oblique, with the lower jaw prominent. Teeth small; canines none. ‘The first dorsal is not so high as the body ; the second is higher than the first, and nearly as high as the body. Caudal rounded. Light brown, deeper on the back ; anal and ventral dark-coloured or darker towards their extremities ; dorsal fins each with three or four longitu- dinal rows of dark brown dots ; caudal similarly dotted. Two small specimens in the collection of the British Museum represent this species; they are from Nagasaki. Euctenogobius strigatus, sp. n. D. 65. A. 7° L. lat. 58. The height of the body is one seventh of the total length ; the length of the head is contained four times and a half in the same. The eyes are almost close together, equal to the length of the snout in diameter, and not quite one third of the length of the head. Head naked, nape scaly ; the length of the head is double its breadth and height, which are equal. Fourteen longitudinal series of scales between the dorsal and anal fins. Ventral distant from vent by about half its length. First dorsal lower than the second. Reddish brown, with numerous darker narrow vertical streaks on each side of the body from Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Ser.4. Vol. xv. 10 146 Mr. A. W. E, O'Shaughnessy on head to caudal, two dark streaks from eye to mouth ; fins variegated with brown, as in Gobius banana; a brown mark on upper part of base of pectoral. One specimen in the British-Museum collection, from Surinam, 3 inches long. Juctenogobius latus, sp. n. D.63. A.}. L. lat. 60. - it The depth of the body is contained eight times and a half in the total length, being less than half the length of the head, which is very large and broad, its length one fourth of the total, its breadth more than half its length and much greater than its depth. Muzzle prone: broad and flattened above, nearly half the length of the head; upper jaw over- lapping the lower. Teeth rather stout, in one series only in the upper jaw. Eyes small, on the apes surface of the head ; their diameter equal to the interorbital space, and one third of the length of the snout. Head naked. Scales small in front of dorsal, large on the body; thirteen series between dorsal and anal. Ventral not reaching to vent; pectoral longer ; first dorsal rather higher than the body and than the second dorsal ; caudal rounded, rather more than one sixth of the total length. Reddish or yellowish brown, with dark brown spots and varie- gations on the sides; fins barred and spotted with dark brown ; the second dorsal with regular variegations between the rays ; anal grey. This species presents a considerable resemblance to Gobius banana and G. transandeanus ; but the teeth are distinctly those of Euctenogobius. We are not told whether Godcus dolichocephalus, Cope, Trans. Amer. Phil. Soc. xiii. p. 403, has the teeth in one or more series in the upper jaw; but a comparison with the descriptions of that species and of Euctenogobius badius, Gill, Ann. Lyc. N. H. New York, vii. p- 45, shows that the present species differs considerably from both of them. One specimen in the collection of the British Museum was collected by Dr. Wucherer at Bahia. Length 6} inches. Eleotris perniger (?), Cope, Tr. Am. Phil. Soc. (n. s.) xiv. 1871, p. 473. D. 6}. A.z. L. lat. 56. A spine at the angle of the preoperculum. Height of body one sixth of total length; length of head contained rather = =—— ieee, Sine OOO. _ new Species of Gobiide. 147 more than three times and a half in the same. Head thick, obtuse, lower jaw prominent. Eye one sixth of length of head, and contained once and a half in interorbital space. Upper part of head scaly to between the eyes; operculum scaly, preeoperculum naked; sixteen series of scales between second dorsal and anal. First dorsal a little lower than the second. Caudal contained five times and a half in total length. Teeth not enlarged. Colour dusky brown; first dorsal whitish at the top and longitudinally streaked with dark brown; second dorsal with numerous longitudinal series of dark-brown spots ; caudal barred like second dorsal; other fins dusky. Young specimen much lighter-coloured. Two specimens, adult and young, in the British-Museum were sent from Bahia by Dr. Wucherer. They differ in several points from Cope’s description, but are probably to be referred to the above species. Eleotris brevirostris, Steindachner, Sitzungsb. Akad. Wien, lvi. 1, 1867, p. 314,=Z. compressus, Krefft, P. Z. 8. 1864, p. 184. Eleotris Monteiri, sp. n. D. 65. A.s. L. lat. 69. Resembles E. fusca. Preoperculum with spine; scales smaller than in £. fusca, particularly on the fore parts of the body. Outer series of teeth not enlarged as in that species ; the free portion of the tail also much less in depth and more rounded. Minute scales on head to between eyes, and on opercular bones. Height of body one seventh of total length, and rather more than half the length of the head. Lower jaw the longest, and prominent. Maxillary reaching to beyond the vertical from centre of eye. Interorbital space flat, once and a half the diameter of the eye, which is less than one sixth of the length of the head. First dorsal lower than second, much lower than in LE. fusca. Caudal elongate, oblong, one fifth of the total length. Colour dark brown above, lighter beneath ; fins variegated or clouded with dark brown. One specimen in the British-Museum collection from the river San Nicolas, Little Fish Bay, in Angola, presented by Mr. Monteiro. Length 5 inches.. Amblyopus mexicanus, sp. 0. D.65. A. = Height of body one thirteenth of the total length. Body covered all over with scale-shaped crypts. Head naked. at 148 Bibliographical Notices. Dorsal three fourths of height of body. Eye small, but distinct. Snout obtuse; lower jaw advancing a little beyond pe Teeth small, closely set, the outer series much smaller and more closely set than in A, Broussonetii. Dorsal and anal connected with caudal. Upper parts dark brown, with a series of white spots along the whole a of the side; lower parts of sides and body white. One specimen in the British Museum, from Mexico, pur- chased. Length 1 foot 8} inches. BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTICES. Two Bone-Caves in Switzerland. 1, Anon. The Excavation in the Kesslerloch near Thayingen: ‘ Alpen- post,’ No. 14, April 4, 1874, pp. 196-199, with 2 woodcuts. 2. Prof. Arsert Herm. On a “Find,” of the Reindeer Period, in Switzerland: Mittheil. antiquarisch. Gesellschaft in Ziirich, vol. xviii. Heft 5, 1874, pp. 125-135, with a 4to plate. 3. H. Karsren. Studies of the Primeval History of Man ina Cave of the Schaffhausen Jura: Mittheil. antiq. Ges. vol. xviii. Heft 6, 1874, pp. 139-162, with 4 4to plates. I. Tue Kesslerloch is a cave piercing a spur of the Jura, about a kilométre west of the railway-station at Thayingen (or Thiingen), in the Canton of Schaffhausen. It opens to the east on the level of the valley along which the railway passes, and to the south-west at about three métres higher level. Many similar, but smaller, caves are found in the neighbouring hills of upper white Jurassic limestone, Incited by the discoveries made in the many caves of Germany, Belgium, and France, the two masters of the High School of Thayingen, MM. Wepf and Merk, set to work examining this cave in the Christmas holidays of 1873-74. Having removed 1 to 1} foot of fragments of limestone, they exposed a black layer, a foot or more thick, full of bones and horns and other remains. Beneath this they came upon a red bed, with black and brown patches in it, over 6 feet thick in one place (down to water), and crowded with small flint knives, cores, and flakes, broken marrow-bones, and other evidences of man’s early habitation. One of the most interesting specimens was found in the southern half of the cave, on the top of the red bed, about a métre below the surface, and consists of a piece of subeylindrical Reindeer-antler bearing an incised life-like outline of a Reindeer grazing. The deposits in the cave were horizontal ; but the floor of the cave was found to be much lower near the entrance than further back; and it is thought that the higher part was the habitation, and into the lower part the refuse bones, stones, &c. were flung by the old inhabitants. No definite succession of Bibliographical Notices. 149 relics in the red and black deposits was discerned; they were scattered throughout, and, proving to be of the Reindeer Period, indicate this as one of the oldest of the Swiss caves, like those on the Saléve and near Villeneuve. Indeed the lowest bed is supposed to be of the Mammoth Period. No signs of polishing appear on any of the flint implements ; and no pottery has been found as yet. The bones are well preserved, and the joint-ends have not been gnawed; the hollow bones, however, have been broken open. Bones of the Hare are most plentiful; next, those of the Reindeer and Stag, and then the Horse. Bird-bones are not rare, especially of the Ptarmigan. Two bones seem to be referable to the Bison or Aurochs. Single bones were met with of the Fox (?), Hyzna(?), and Bear. Lastly, in the lowest bed were found some fragments of a molar of the Mammoth. Prof. Heim, describing in full the Reindeer figure engraved on the piece of antler, which is carefully illustrated in the plate ac- companying the Memoir, insists upon the bold, free, and exact drawing of the old draughtsman, evidently by no means a beginner in his art, and finds reason to show that he was right-handed. In comparing this work of prehistoric art with those found in the Caves of Périgord, and figured by Lartet and Christy in the ‘ Reli- quiz Aquitanice,’ Prof. Heim notices the superior design and effect of this natural and finished figure, as compared with the outlines of Reindeer from that district; but some known outlines of the Aurochs from Peérigord (sketched, feebly in the ‘ Matériaux pour VHist. de ’ Homme,’ vol. y. pl. 21) have equal vigour and truth, and the carver of such poniard-handles as that figured in the ‘ Reli- quiz Agquitanice,’ B. pl. xx., could really represent the Reindeer with exactness and grace. The Swiss Reindeer under notice, with its pinched-up belly, appears to us to be migrating from a poor feeding-ground, perhaps intent on a fresh pasture. Prof. Heim objects to a disproportionate largeness of the head and smallness of the ear. Possibly its poor condition has attenuated the body ; or still more likely, knowing the truthfulness of these old artists in other respects, we may believe that this variety of Reindeer had a large head. Prof. Heim points to other analogies presented by the contents of the Kesslerloch with those of the caves on the Vézére. Piercers made of bone, and broad sharp-edged implements of bone and antler, fragments of the so-called Batons or Pogamagans, barbed harpoons, and fragments of cut antlers were met with, thus corre- sponding in many respects with the contents of the caves of the Reindeer Period in the south-west of France. Il. After some remarks on the sudden growth of prehistoric studies and on the possibly rash calculations made as to the antiquity of man, H. Karsten states that, with the view of studying these matters for himself, he sought for a cave near Schaffhausen ; and, with his friend Dr. E. Joos, he found one in February 1874 fully 150 Bibliographical Notices. answering his purpose. This cave is in the Freudenthal, a little N.-S. valley, opening on the Rhine near Schaffhausen, in the upper white Jurassic limestone, there dipping 5°S.E. It is scarcely 70 feet above the valley, under a projecting rock on the eastern slope, which is called the Rosenhalde, about 120 feet high, and forming the western edge of the Reyath plateau. The entrance of the cave was nearly blocked up with the débris covering the hill- side ; but it proved to be about 4 feet high and wide, and 10 feet long, leading into a large interior, quite dark, about 50 feet long, 6 feet broad in the middle, and 12 feet high, with the floor sinking towards each side, and rising gently from the middle both inwards and outwards, the former slope being due to the rise of the bottom of the cave, whilst the slope near the entrance was due to the in- coming of débris from without. Some bones of a Fox and of a Sheep, with a charred stick, lay about the surface. By successive diggings, with the aid of Dr. E. Joos, Herr Niiesch (of the High School), Prof. Merklein, and a labourer or two, Herr Karsten found the following succession of deposits :—1. Uppermost, 2 feet of loose limestone fragments, with some bones of recent animals scattered throughout, also some few shards of turned pottery, the lowest at 14 foot depth. On the surface were flakes of limestone, containing flint nodules, loosened by frost from the roof. 2. One foot of similar limestone débris, but mixed with marl, more especially downwards, yellow and grey. It contained some bones of Stag, Roe, Fox, Badger, Boar, Goat, and other recent animals, together with fragments of human bones and pieces of very coarse pottery, more abundant than that in the upper bed, and thus distributed to the depth of from 2 to 3 feet. Only one perfect vessel could be‘ restored from the many scattered shards. This pottery is hand-made, ornamented with nail-marks and such like. It corresponds with that of the pile-villages, and, according to Dr. Keller, is similar to that of the Gallo-Celtic period. No stalag- mite was met with in the cave; but between the beds No. 1 and No. 2 there is a local bed of loose white calc-tuff, partly pisolitic, without any stones, 1 foot thick and about 2 square métres in extent. 3. Below the one-foot pottery band is another bed of limestone debris, from 1 to 1} foot in the back part, and 2 feet thick in the front part of the cave, mixed with much more clay than in No. 2, and, indeed, in the lowest layers half clay. This bed was full of broken bones of man and beasts, the latter either now extinct or gone from the region (Reindeer, Ibex, Horse, &c.), together with Reindeer-antlers, works of art made of antler and of wood, broken flints and flint knives, so called. Entire flints also occurred in great numbers, and partly of a colour different from that in the upper beds, where a flint nearly 4 cubic feet in size was met with. With the bones &c. occurred also a number of pebbles of quartzose and crystalline rocks, some of which apparently had been used for rubbers, having flat rubbed faces; also smoothing- and polishing- stones of quartzose, argillaceous, and calcareous schists; lastly, a Bibliographical Notices. 151 shell of Pectunculus (like P. violaceus and P. glycymeris), smoothed down, and bored at the umbo. In short, says H. Karsten, we found nearly, if not quite, the same conditions as described by De Taillefer and Saussure (‘Archives Se. Phys. Nat.’ 1870) at Veyrier and Ville- neuve on the Lake of Geneva, and by Von Fraas at Schussenreid, and quite the same objects, only more sparingly, as were found close by on the south-east side of the Reyath, near Thayingen* (‘ Neues Jahrbuch fiir Min. Geol. u. Paliiont.’ 1874, pp. 265-268). As at the places mentioned, and at many others worked out in the Depart- ment of Dordogne and in Belgium, the remains of human households are found in this so-called civilization-bed (Culturschicht), without any trace of pottery, under turf-, tuff-, and breccia-deposits, so at the Rosenhalde this bed yields no evidence at all of the existence and use of cooking-vessels. From the entrance nearly to the middle of the eave this bed was streaked grey and black, and contained a larger proportion of flint knives; and some charcoal, burnt bones, and flat pieces of limestone and sandstone, burnt red, here clearly indicated a fireplace or hearth. At the left side, towards which the beds gently sloped, the implements and chips were particularly abundant. The boundary between this implement-bed (1 foot thick on an average) and the loam beneath is not definite ; and probably the early cave-dwellers here trod many of their refuse things into the loam softened in rainy weather by drip-water. 4. This lower loam, brownish yellow in colour, was very thin in the back part, and about a foot thick in the fore part of the cave. It had none of the small angular limestone fragments, but contained numerous irregularly shaped nodules, rough to the touch, and mostly penetrated by crystalline veins. Together with flints and small nodules of Bohnerz (eoncretionary oxide of iron), these nodules oceur of all sizes, and belong apparently to the same category as some very large blocks (one measuring half a cubic métre) which were noticeable in the upper beds. The flint nodules have a white chalk-like crust, as much as 4 lines thick. Some fragmentary bones and molar teeth of Mammoth found in the cave appear to have come from this bed, if, indeed, they do not belong to the lowest part of the bed with flint knives and reindeer-bones. 5. In the back part of the cave, under the loam was a local deposit of tough white clay, without bones or stones, similar to the mamma- liferous fire-clay and pottery-clay on the top of the Reyath. Among the several subjects of interest discussed in this memoir, the author gives his reasons for believing that the cave-folk were eannibals, on account of the split marrew-bones and the peculiarly fractured condition of a piece of human skull found at the Rosen- halde—thus accepting the conclusions arrived at by Spring studying the Chavaux cave, by Jarrigou on the cave near Montesquieu- Avantes, and by Virchow (Address, ‘ Naturf. Ver. Wiesbaden,’ 1873). Remarks also on the probable history of the several deposits, com- parisons of the contents of the Rosenhalde cave with those of the * See also aboye, p. 148. 152 Bibliographical Notices. Kesslerloch near Thayingen and other caves, descriptive notes on the several figured specimens of stone, antler, bone, &c., and dis- cussions as to the relative and positive dates of the Cave-dwellers complete the memoir. The author thinks 4000 years a sufficient period to allow of the habitation of the cave, after the lowest bed with Mammoth-bones had been washed in and the waters drained off, and for the forma- tion of the bed with flint knives and hearth-stuff and subsequent accumulations. The plates illustrate :—flint-cores and flakes, the latter mostly simple, rarely dressed or worked ; simply pointed harpoon-heads, of various patterns and ornament ; bone chisels ; eyed needle, simple awls and piercers, rippers and smoothers, made of antler ; perforated ornaments or charms of wood, shell, and bone; cut antlers; a piece of elephant-bone, and a portion of a human skull fractured by a blunt implement ; also a view of the Rosenhalde and diagrams of the cave and its deposits. Recherches pour servir aU Histoire Naturelle des Mammiferes, com- prenant des Considérations sur la Classification de ces Animaux par M. H. Mitng-Epwarps, des Observations sur 0 Hippopotame de Liberia et des*Etudes sur la Faune de la Chine et du Thibet orientale par M. Atrpnonsr Mrtnz-Epwarps. Tome premier : Texte. Tome second: Atlas, 105 planches. 4to. Paris, 1868 & 1874. M. Mityz-Epwarps proposes another scheme for the arrangement of the Mammalia. Like all these schemes, it contains some good points and shows some affinities; but these multitudes of arrange- ments are of great detriment to the progress of science. M. Alphonse Milne-Edwards gives a good figure of the Liberian hippopotamus from life, a figure of its skeleton, and details of its skull, brain, &c., the two latter showing that Morton was quite right in regarding this animal as a distinct species and genus from the common hippopotamus, of which some zoologists consider it only a pygmy race. M. Alphonse Milne-Edwards describes and figures the following new forms of Mammalia from China and Thibet :— 1. Rhinopithecus Rowellane. A monkey with a slightly elongate recurved nose, from Eastern Thibet. 2. Ailuropus melanoleucus. A large black-and-white bear with a very short broad head, from Thibet. 3. Scaptochirus moschatus. A genus allied to the mole, from Mongolia. 4. Nyctogale elegans. An iridescent water-Insectivores _ 5. Scaptonyx fuscicaudatus ; 6. Uropsilus soricipes ; and 7, Anouro- sorex squamipes. Allied to the shrewmice. Besides these, he figures and describes, almost all as new :—twe Royal Society. 153 species of Macacus, one of Rhinolophus (for which he gives a name previously used by Hodgson), one Vespertilio, and two species of Murina, six of Felis, five of Putorius, and three of Meles, regard- ing a new species of Arctonya as belonging to this genus; one species of Talpa, two of Sorew, and one of Crocidura ; four species of Siphneus, three of Gerbillus, three of Cricetus, two of Arvicola, three of Pteromys, two of Sciurus, one of Arctomys, and one of Spermophilus ; eight species of Mus, one of Rhizomys, and one of Lagomys; four species of Antilope of the subgenus Nemorhedus, one Budorcas, one Ovis; three species of Cervus (one of which he refers to a new subgenus that he calls Zlaphodes), one Cervulus, one Moschus, and one Sus. All these constitute a very valuable contribution to Eastern zoology. J. E. G. PROCEEDINGS OF LEARNED SOCIETIES. ROYAL SOCIETY. December 10, 1874.—Joseph Dalton Hooker, C.B., President, in the Chair. “On the Development of the Teeth of the Newt, Frog, Slowworm, and Green Lizards.” By Cuarues 8. Tomes, M.A. That the ‘“ papillary stage” of tooth-development could not be said to exist at any time either in the frog or in certain fish, was pointed out nearly twenty years ago by Professor Huxley, who, however, accepted, on the authority of Goodsir, the latter’s theory of the process as true of Man and Mammalia. In more recent years Kolliker and Waldeyer have traced out the course of the development of teeth with great accuracy in Man and some other Mammalia, with the result of showing that the usually accepted views propounded by Goodsir and Arnold are not by any means an accurate representation of what takes place in them. Since the date of the publication of Professor Huxley’s paper, I am not aware that any thing has been published bearing upon the development of the teeth of Reptilia and Batrachia, save a paper by Dr. Lionel Beale upon the development of the teeth of the Newt, and a short and inconclusive paper by Santi Sirena; with the exception of the papers alluded to, the subject may be taken to stand in the position which it occupied at the time of the publication of Professor Owen’s ‘ Odontography,’ in which we are told that the teeth-germs of Reptiles and Batrachia never stop at the papillary stage, but that the primitive dental papilla sinks into the substance of the gum and becomes inclosed by a capsule. 154 Royal Society :-— The principal facts which my observations enable me to state are :— That there is no such thing as a “dental groove” or “dental fissure” in the Batrachia and Sauria, but that the whole process takes place beneath an unbroken surface of epithelium. That there is no such thing as a stage of “free papille,” and consequently no sinking of papille into the gum and subsequent encapsulation of the same. Instead of being formed in a “ dental groove” the teeth are de- veloped in a region which may be termed the area of tooth-develop- ment, varying in form and extent in different Reptilia, but agreeing in all in possessing the following characters :— _It is bounded on the one side by the teeth in place and the parapet of bone which carries them, and on the other, or inner, side by an exceedingly sharply defined boundary, consisting of dense connective tissue. At the surface, near where the functional tooth projects above the oral epithelium, it is narrow, but it expands as it passes more deeply below the surface. Within this area are developing tooth-sacs of different ages, the interspaces being oceupied by a loose areolar tissue, differing in appearance from that which is seen outside the area, and appearing to be derived from portions of older tooth-sacs, which have not been entirely used up in the formation of the teeth. The individual tooth-sacs are formed thus: an inflection of the cells of the oral epithelium, in section like a tubular gland, passes down along the inner side of the area above defined, until it reaches nearly to the level of the floor of the area. The depth to which it penetrates is considerable in many forms, e. g. in the Lizards, in which, therefore, this double layer of epithelial cells appears a mere line. At the bottom of this inflection of epithelial cells the adjacent tissue assumes the form of a small eminence (without at first any visible structural alteration), while the epithelial process takes the shape of a bell-like cap over the eminence. This epithelial inflection then goes to form the enamel-organ ; the eminence becomes the dentine-organ. Thus the enamel-germ is the first thing recognizable, and the presence of this ingrowth of epithelial cells seems to determine the formation of a dentine-organ at that particular spot which lies beneath its termination. The enamel-organs, after they are fully formed, retain a con- nexion with epithelial cells, external to the ovoid or spherical tooth- sacs, at their summits ; and the enamel-organs of successive teeth appear to be derived from the necks of those of their predecessors rather than from fresh inflections from the surface of the oral epithelium, though I am not sure that this is, in all instances, the case. The tooth-sac of the newt is entirely cellular, and has no special investment or capsule; under pressure it breaks up and nothing but cells remain, as was noted by Dr. Lionel Beale. — On the Development of the Teeth of Ophidia. 155 That of the frog has an investment, derived in the main from what may be called the accidental condensation of the surrounding connective tissue, which is pushed out of the way as it grows ; while in the lizard the base of the dentine-germ furnishes lateral prolongations, just as has been observed to be the case in man. The dentine-organs conform closely with those of mammals ; the odontoblast layer is very distinct, and the processes passing from these cells into the dentine-tubes are often visible. The enamel-organs consist only of the outer and inner epithelia, without any stellate intermediate tissue ; as, in some instances, enamel is certainly formed, the existence of the stellate tissue is obviously non-essential. When a tooth is moving to displace its predecessor, its sac travels with it, remaining intact until the actual attachment of the tooth to the bone by ankylosis. “On the Structure and Development of the Teeth of Ophidia.” By Cuartes 8. Tomes, M.A. Contrary to the opinion expressed by Professor Owen and en- dorsed by Giebel and all subsequent writers, the author finds that there is no cementum upon the teeth of snakes, the tissue which has been so named proving, both from a study of its physical cha- racters and, yet more conclusively, from its development, to be enamel. The generalization that the teeth of all reptiles consist of dentine and cement, to which is occasionally added enamel, must hence be abandoned. Without as yet pledging himself to the following opinion, the author believes that in the class of Reptiles the presence of cementum will be found associated with the implantation of the teeth in more or less complete sockets, as in the Crocodiles and Ichthyosaurs. The tooth-germs of Ophidia consist of a conical dentine-germ, resembling in all save its shape that of other animals, of an enamel-organ, and of a feebly expressed capsule, derived mainly from the condensation of the surrounding connective tissue. The enamel-organ consists only of a layer of enamel-cells, forming a very regular columnar epithelium, and of a few com- pressed cells external to this, hardly amounting to a distinct layer ; the enamel-organ is coextensive with the dentine-germ. There is no stellate reticulum separating the outer and inner epithelia of the enamel-organ. The successional teeth are very numerous, no less than seven being often seen in a single section; and their arrangement is peculiar, and quite characteristic of the Ophidia. The tooth next in order of succession is to be found at the inner side of the base of the tooth in place, where it lies nearly hori- zontally ; but the others stand more nearly vertically, parallel with the jaw and with the tooth in place, the youngest of the series being at the bottom. 156 Royal Society. The whole row of tooth-sacs is contained within a single general connective-tissue investment, which is entered at the top by the descending process of oral epithelium, whence the enamel-germs are derived. As they attain considerable length, the forming teeth, which were at first vertical, become nearly horizontal, resuming, of course, their upright position once more when they come into place. The clue to the whole peculiarity of this arrangement is to be found in the extreme dilatation which the mouth of the snake undergoes. The general capsular investment probably serves to preserve the tooth-sacs from displacement ; while, if the forming teeth remained vertical after they had attained to any considerable length, their points would be protruded through the mucous mem- brane when this was put upon the stretch in the swallowing of rey. Just as the author has shown in a previous communication to be the case in the Batrachia and Sauria, the hypothetical ‘ papillary stage” is at no time present. From the oral epithelium there extends downwards a process which, passing between and winding around the older tooth-sacs, after pursuing a tortuous course, reaches the furthest and lowest extremity of the area of tooth-development. Here its cecal end gives origin to an enamel-organ, and, while it does so, buds forth again beyond it in the form of a cecal extremity. Thus at the bottom of this area of tooth-development there is a perpetual formation of fresh enamel-organs, beneath which arise correspond- ing dentine-organs, or papille,; if such they can be called when arising thus far away from the surface. In essential principle, therefore, the formation ‘of a tooth- germ is similar to that already described in mammals aud other reptiles, the difference lying principally in the enormous relative length of, and the tortuous course pursued by, that inflection of the oral epithelium which serves to form the enamel-organs. The attachment of the tooth to the jaw is effected by the rapid de- velopment of a coarse bone, which is not derived from the ossi- fication of the feebly expressed tooth-capsule, but from tissues altogether external to it. Nevertheless this coarse bone of attach- ment adheres more closely to the tooth than to the rest of the jaw, from which, in making sections, it often breaks away. The base of the dentinal pulp assists in firmly binding the tooth to this new bone, being converted into a layer of irregular dentine. . This “bone of attachment” is almost wholly removed and re- newed with the change of each tooth. — Miscellaneous. 157 MISCELLANEOUS. On some Points in the Anatomy of the Common Mussel (Mytilus edulis), By M. A, Saparter. In the mussel the apparatuses of circulation, respiration, and urinary excretion present arrangements which differ in some respects from those observed in the Lamellibranchiate Mollusca generally. The central apparatus of circulation consists of a heart with two auricles, which does not furnish an aorta at its posterior extremity. This aorta springs from the anterior aorta at the lower surface of the aortic bulb, and passes backward to supply the stomach and in- testine. The anterior aorta furnishes the hepatie and tentacular arteries and especially the great parallel arteries which are distributed over the outer surface of the mantle. The return passages of the blood to the heart are very complex, and vary according to the organs. On each side of the body there is a great vessel, running obliquely from above downwards and from the front backwards, which opens directly into the auricle ; this is the oblique afferent vein. Its lower extremity opens into a large longitudinal cavity, situated at the level of the adherent margin of the mantle and composed of two parts, a posterior and an anterior longitudinal vein. The veins of the mantle are placed on the inner surface. They ascend towards the adherent margin of the mantle, and anastomose below this margin to form a large, zigzag, horizontal vein. From the superior angles of this sinuous trunk spring vertical trunks, which soon subdivide into small canals to penetrate into’some special organs, which I shall describe under the name of plaited or frilled organs. The blood which has traversed these organs penetrates in part into the vascular network of the corpus Bojani, and in part into the anterior longitudinal vein. The blood coming from the liver and the anterior visceral mass penetrates directly into the corpus Bojani. A small portion of the blood from the mantle passes, also directly, into the oblique afferent vein, and another portion directly into the anterior longitudinal vein. The corpus Bojani is far from presenting the characters seen in it in most Lamellibranchiate Mollusca. It does not form a clearly distinct organ as in these Mollusca; but neither is it entirely com- posed, as has been asserted, of plates of Bojanian tissue lining the walls of the large veins and auricles. In fact we can distinguish in the corpus Bojani of the mussel two different parts—one autono- mous, the other dependent on the large veins. The autonomous part is anterior, and is to be seen on the lateral portions of the liver, in the furrow which separates that organ from the base of the branchie ; it is formed of a series of vertical membranous folds, and is of a greenish brown colour. The folds enclose cavities which open successively by their superior extremities into a collecting canal, the diameter of which increases rapidly from before back- wards, and which is exactly within the afferent vessel of the branchia. 158 Miscellaneous. The portion of the corpus Bojani which lines the vascular walls occurs on the walls of the auricle, the oblique afferent vein, and the posterior longitudinal vein. This last vessel is only separated from the posterior half of the collecting duct of the corpus Bojani by a spongy lamina or septum of Bojanian tissue, which, being pierced by numerous small orifices, allows of communication between the vessel and the collecting-duct. The cells constituting the Bojanian tissue are not the same throughout. Those of the autonomous portion and of the septum just mentioned are formed of a very transparent protoplasm, in which there are a very variable number of small green granules ; they have no nucleus. Those belonging to the walls of the oblique afferent vein and of the auricle contain, besides the green granules, large colourless nuclei provided with one or two colourless nucleoles ; they also contain colourless granules. The passage from the cells of the first to those of the second kind takes place rather suddenly, which justifies us in thinking that the latter are not exclusively Bojanian, but that they may also fulfil other functions. The cavity of the pericardium is continuous below, by a passage placed in front of the oblique afferent vein, with the collecting-duct of the corpus Bojani. Between the passage and the collecting-duct there is a narrow oblique orifice which allows the passage of a liquid from the passage into the duct, but impedes its return in the opposite direction. ‘The liquid which has traversed the corpus Bojani rids itself of certain principles, which are received in the pericardium, the passage, and the collecting-duct. This last communicates with the exterior by a very narrow orifice, placed at the apex of a very small papilla, concealed behind the papille of the reproductive organs; the discovery of this orifice is due to M. de Lacaze-Duthiers. The Bojanian collecting-canal receives in part the blood from the veins of the “‘ bosse de Polichinelle ” at the level of the branchial ganglia, and opens posteriorly with a large posterior pallial vein, which serves as a canal of derivation for the blood returning from the mantle at those periods when the pallial circulation is very abundant—that is to say, during the period of reproduction. The organs of respiration are multiple. They include the branchie, the surface of the body, and especially the inner surface of the mantle and the plaited or frilled organs. The branchiz are composed of very small filaments, traversed by a single very narrow canal. These branchial canals originate, for the most part, directly from the Bojanian tissue, others from a branchial afferent vessel of spongy or cavernous structure; they open into an afferent vessel, the diameter of which increases from behind forwards, and which occupies the upper margin of the free lamella of the branchia, This afferent vessel of the branchia receives in front some superficial vessels of the liver, some little veins of the mantle, and the veins of the buccal tentacles, and it opens into the anterior extremity of the anterior longitudinal vein. The branchial Miscellaneous. 159 circulation differs greatly in its degree of intensity from the branchial circulation of the other Lamellibranchiate Mollusca ; it is very feeble or almost none; branchial injections, moreover, are rarely successful and always very imperfect. This deficiency of circulation depends :— 1, on the small calibre of the branchial vessels ; 2, on the weakness of the flow of the blood, which only arrives at the branchi after having traversed the Bojanian and other capillary networks ; and, 3, on the existence of easy return passages, which allow the blood to return to the heart without having traversed the branchiz. The mantle plays an important part as an organ of respiration. But during the period of reproduction it is gorged with eggs or spermatozoids, since it contains the reproductive organs; it acquires a great thickness and becomes a very active visceral organ in which hzematosis does not take place, and in which, on the contrary, the blood becomes charged with carbonic acid in consequence of the activity of the phenomena of nutrition. The respiratory functions are then performed by the platted organs, which are arranged in a close series on the inner surface and near the adherent margin of the mantle. They have been mistaken for simple vessels ; but they are hollow lamin, very regularly sinuous, and with very elegant foldings. Their cavity is rendered spongy by a true reticulum of very delicate elastic fibres. Their surface is clothed with vertical series of cells with long vibratile cilia, which effect the renewal of the water; the interspaces of these series of cells are occupied by cells with short cilia. These plaited organs receive the blood which returns from the mantle. I regard them as a respiratory organ, a supplementary branchia, destined to play an important part during the period of reproduction, when the mantle does not respire. This opinion is, moreover, in harmony with the fact that the plaited organs are much more prominent and much better filled with blood at the time when the mantle is occupied by the reproductive elements. These plaited organs are therefore neither a part of the corpus Bojani, as Siebold believed, nor simple vessels detached from the mantle, as has also been supposed.—Comptes Rendus, August 31, 1874, vol. lxxix. pp. 581-584. Note on Herpeton tentaculatum. M. Albert Morice, surgeon in the French navy, has kindly com- municated to me that he has succeeded in bringing a living ex- ample of this snake to the Zoological Garden in Paris. He ob- served it in the south-eastern provinces of Camboja; and writes as follows :— “« Herpeton tentaculatum is ovo-viviparous, bringing forth six young ones at a birth, which are 0-28 m. long. Its food is mixed; it feeds on tadpoles and small fish, and also on an aquatic plant called by the natives ‘ Ran giua,’ or Jussiaa repens of botanists.” A. GUNTHER. 160 Miscellaneous. Notice of some Freshwater and Terrestrial Rhizopods. By Pror, Lerpy. Prof. Leidy stated that among the amboid forms noticed by him in the vicinity of Philadelphia, there was one especially remarkable for the comparatively enormous quantity of quartzose sand which it swallowed with its food. The animal might be viewed as a bag of sand! It is a sluggish creature, and when at rest appears as an opaque white, spherical ball, ranging from $ to $ of a line in diameter. The animal moves slowly, first assuming an oval and then a clavate form. In the oval form one measured # of a line long by 2 of a line broad; and when it became clavate 1t was ¢ of a line long by } of a line broad at the advanced thick end. Another, in the clavate form, measured { of a line long by 3 of a line wide at the thick end. The creature rolls or extends in advance, while it contracts behind. Unless under pressure, it puts forth no pseudo- pods; and the granular entosare usually follows closely on the limits of the extending ectosarec, Generally the animal drags after it a quantity of adherent dirt attached to a papillated or villous discoid projection of the body. The contents of the animal, besides the granular matter and many globules of the entosarc, consist of diatoms, desmids, and confervee, together with a larger proportion of angular particles of transparent and mostly colourless quartz. Treated with strong mineral acids, so as to destroy all the soft parts, the animal leaves behind more than half its bulk of quartzose sand. The species may be named Ama@pa saBuLosa, and is probably a member of the genus Pelomyxa of Dr. Greef (Archiv f. mikr. Anat. x. 1873, p. 61). The animal was first found on the muddy bottom of a pond in Dr. George Smith’s place in Upper Darby, Delaware County, but has been found also in ponds in New Jersey. When the animal was first noticed with its multitude of sand particles, it suggested the probability that it might pertain to a stage of life of Difflugia, and that by the fixation of the quartz particles in the exterior, the case of the latter would be formed. This is conjectural, and not confirmed by any observation. A minute ameboid animal found on Spirogyra in a ditch at Cooper’s Point, opposite Philadelphia, is of interesting character. The body is hemispherical, yellowish, and consists of a granular entosare with a number of scattered and well-defined globules, besides a large contractile vesicle. From the body there extends a broad zone, which is colourless, and so exceedingly delicate that it requires a power of 600 diameters to see it favourably. By this zone the animal glides over the surface. Delicate as it is, it evi- dently possesses a regular structure, though it was not resolved under the best powers of the microscope. The structure probably consists of globular granules of uniform size, alternating with one another, so that the disk at times appears crossed by delicate lines, and at others as if finely and regularly punctated. The body of Miscellaneous. 161 the animal measures from ;!; to s\; of a line in diameter ; and the zone is from sh, to shy of a line wide, The species may be named AMCBA ZONALIS. The interesting researches of Prof. Richard Greef, of Marburg, published in the second volume of Schultze’s ‘ Archiv ‘f. mikro- skopische Anatomie,’ on Amebe living in the earth (“ Ueber einige in der Erde lebende Amceben, &c.”), led me to look in similar posi- tions for Rhizopods. In the earth, about the roots of mosses growing in the crevices of the bricks of our city pavements, in damp places, besides finding several species of Amba, together with abundance of the common wheel-animaleule, Rotifer vulgaris, I had the good fortune to dis- cover a species of Gromia. I say good fortune; for it is with the utmost pleasure I have watched this curious creature for hours together. The genus was discovered and well described by Du- jardin from two species, one of which, G. oviformis, was found in the seas of France; the other, the G. /lwiatilis, in the river Seine. Imagine an animal, like one of our autumnal spiders, stationed at the centre of its well-spread net; imagine every thread of this net to be a living extension of the animal, elongating, branching, and becoming confluent so as to form a most intricate net; and imagine every thread to exhibit actively moving currents of a viscid liquid, both outward and inward, carrying along particles of food and dirt, and you have some idea of the general character of a Gromia. The Gromia of our pavements is a spherical cream-coloured body, about 51; of a line in diameter. When detached from its posi- tion and placed in water, in a few minutes it projects in all direc- tions a most wonderful and intricate net. Along the threads of this net float minute Navicule from the neighbourhood, like boats in the current of a stream, until reaching the central mass they are there swallowed. Particles of dirt are also collected from all directions, and are accumulated around the animal; and when the accumulation is sufficient to protect it, the web is withdrawn, and nothing appa- rently will again induce the animal to produce it. From these observations we may suppose that the Gromra TERRI- coxa, as-I propose to name the species, during dry weather remains quiescent and concealed among accumulated dirt in the crevices of our pavements, but that in rains or wet weather the little creature puts forth its living net, which becomes so many avenues along which food is conveyed to the body. As the neighbourhood becomes dry, the net is withdrawn to await another rain. The animal with its extended net can cover an area of nearly half a line in diameter. The threads of the net are less than the ,;4,, of an inch in dia- meter.—Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phil. 1874, p. 88. Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Ser. 4. Vol, xv. 11 162 Miscellaneous. On Leucochloridium paradoxum and the Development of the Larve contained in it into Distoma. By Dr. Ernst ZEvter. In this memoir the author gives some new details upon Leuco- chloridium, and especially describes the experiments which have led him to the discovery of the species of Distomwm into which the Cercarie contained in this singular nurse are transformed. We shall dwell here more particularly upon what relates to the migra- tion of this Trematode into its definitive host. By keeping some Succinee in confinement Dr. Zeller was enabled to observe the growth of the Leucochloridium through their integu- ments. It takes about four weeks for a sac to be developed so as to become visible in the anterior part of the mollusk, and three weeks more for it to acquire its full development. When one of the sacs has acquired its full dimensions and moved for a certain time in the tentacle of a Succinea, the integuments of the mollusk become so thin in this region as to be ruptured by the action of a slight pressure from without. When such a rupture is produced, the Leucochloridium projects from the tentacle and con- tinues for a considerable time to move actively, although still adhe- ring at the base by its filiform pedicle. It may be artificially detached from the mollusk without the latter seeming to suffer from the operation. The Succinea then remains contracted for some hours ; then it begins again to creep and to take food. If it is kept in favourable conditions, another sac may be developed to replace that which has been removed. M. yon Siebold put forward the supposition that the larva (Cer- caria eaxfoliata, Moulinié) contained in Leucochloridium produced the Distomum holostomum which inhabits the rectum of several marsh birds, such as Rallus aquaticus, Gallinula chloropus and G. porzana. Dr. Zeller, on his part, observed Succinew infested by Leucochloridium in localities where it seemed to him the waders just mentioned could not be met with, but which were, on the contrary, inhabited by various birds of the family Sylviade. He was thus led to suppose that these last might be the true hosts into which the Leucochloridium migrated. This supposition seemed to him to be- come almost a certainty when he found Distomum macrostomum, Rud., in a redbreast, as the organization of that species is in almost complete concordance with that of the larva contained in Leuco- chloridium. This Distomum, the organization of which the author very carefully describes, has hitherto been observed only in the red- breast and some other species of the same group, such as the night- ingale, one or two warblers, and two wagtails. All these birds are insectivorous, and none of them feed upon mollusks. Dr. Zeller supposed that they tore off the Leucochloridium from the tentacles of the Succinea, as its resemblance to the larva of an insect is striking. To verify this hypothesis he offered to a tame redbreast a Suecinea containing Leucochloridia which had pushed into the tentacles. The bird immediately came down upon one of these Miscellaneous. 163 sacs, tore it out of the tentacle, and swallowed it. Several other similar experiments gave the same result. The most interesting was one in which, a mealworm having been placed side by side with a Succinea, the author saw a blackcap seize first the Leuco- chloridiwm and afterwards the mealworm. In all these experiments it was observable that the bird, after having seized the Leuco- chloridium and torn it out with a single strike of the bill, swallowed it, sometimes immediately, sometimes only after striking it several times against the floor of its cage or the perch, thus behaving exactly as the insectivorous birds do with their ordinary food. From the success of these first experiments Dr. Zeller had great hopes of being able to confirm his hypothesis by the autopsy of the birds. So his disappointment was great when he did not find a single Distomum macrostomum in three redbreasts and a blackcap which he dissected some weeks after he had seen them swallow the Leucochloridia. He then questioned whether the larvee of Dis- tomum contained in the Leucochloridia had been quite mature, or whether, perhaps, the artificial nourishment of the birds might not have exercised an injurious influence upon the parasites. In order to avoid these causes of failure he made fresh experiments, employ- ing this time some Succineew which had been kept for a long time in captivity, and containing Distomum-larve, the development of which could not but be sufficiently advanced ; and at the same time, instead of cage-birds, he made use of young birds in a free state, but still in the nest. These birds were shut up with their nests in small cages, and left in a place where they could be fed by their parents. Three series of experiments, made under these conditions, upon whitethroats (Currueca garrula), blackcaps, and wagtails were crowned with full success. The Distoma were fixed in the rectum in great numbers and very lively ; their reproductive organs pre- sented a state of development more or less advanced, according to the length of time they had remained in the intestinal canal of their host. In some of them the oviducts were to be seen filled with ova, some of which even were already of an intense yellow colour. The development of the larva of Distomum macrostomum into the adult animal is very rapid; and the production of the ova seems to com- mence within six days after the migration. Dr. Zeller completes his memoir with some observations on the species allied to D. macrostomum, and upon the hosts which furnish nourishment for these different species of Distomum. He con- siders that Diesing was wrong in combining with D. macrostomum the D. erraticum and D. ringens of Rudolphi. On the other hand, he convinced himself that D, mesostomum, Rud., which occurs in the song-thrush, the grosbeak, the bullfinch, and the greenfinch, is quite distinct from D, macrostomum. But D. holostomum, Rud., from the water-rails and the common water-hen, which M. von Siebold supposed to be the adult form of the larva of Leucochlori- 164 Miscellaneous. dium, presents all the same characters as D. macrostomum, from which it differs only in size. Its length is from } to 24 lines, while that of D. macrostomum is only 4 to 2 line. These two forms would therefore seem to constitute only a single species, which attains larger dimensions in the Waders than in the Passerine birds. The author concludes with some remarks upon the singular mime- tism presented by the Leucochloridium, the resemblance of which to the larva of an insect cannot fail to strike all who examine that singular parasite. In his opinion, this resemblance, destined to de- ceive insectivorous birds, has a teleological significance; for it does not serve for the protection or preservation of the creature, but rather leads to its destruction. It is true that this destruction is associ- ated with the development of the larve contained in it; “ but,” says the author, “no one can suppose that our Leucochloridiwm thus sacrifices its own existence to secure that of its progeny.” Agreed! but no naturalist has ever asserted that mimetism was due to an effect of the will of the creature that imitates. It shows a very erroneous conception of the theory of mimetism, and conse- quently of that of selection, to suppose that it ascribes the modifi- cations of the species to voluntary actions of the individuals ; and we are sorry to see Dr. Zeller make use of the interesting facts that he has discovered in support of such reasoning. In the great struggle for existence the species is all, the individual almost nothing ; and what can be more favourable to the preservation of the species than this deceptive imitation which leads to the sacri- fice of an individual without organs, such as Leucochloridium, in order to secure to the larve of the Distomum their transportation into the intestine of an insectivorous bird, where they can acquire their definitive development and become fitted to reproduce their kind.—Zeitschr. fiir wiss. Zool. vol. xxiy. (1874), p. 564; Bibl. Univ., Bull. Sci. 1874, p. 366. The Diatomece of the Carboniferous Period. By Count F. Casrracane. The author believing that, although hitherto undetected, Dia- tomez must have existed at the time of the formation of coal, hit upon the ingenious expedient of examining with the microscope the ashes of coal, instead of the thin sections previously studied. In this way he has succeeded in ascertaining the presence in coal, received from Liverpool, of a great number of species of Diatoms, Most of them belong to freshwater genera or species; but the presence of marine species mixed with these seems to prove that the ground in which this coal was formed was in more or less frequent communication with the sea.—Actes de V Acad. Pontif. pl Lincet, February 1874; Bibl. Univ., Bull. Sei. 1874, p. ; THE ANNALS MAGAZINE OF NATURAL HISTORY. [FOURTH SERIES. ] No. 87. MARCH 1875. XX.—On Pelagonemertes Rollestoni. By H. N. Mosetey, Naturalist on board H.M.S. ‘Challenger.’ [Plate XV. B.] Tus remarkable form was found in the trawl, together with a number of deep-sea animals, from 1800 fathoms, near the southern verge of the South-Australian current, lat. 50° 1'S., long. 123° 4' E., March 7, 1874. Its appearance at once pro- nounced it a pelagic animal, the body being gelatinous and transparent, as in Salpa, with the exception of the alimentary canal, which stood out in relief, being of a deep burnt-sienna colour (as is the nucleus in many Salpe), and the region of the sheath of the proboscis, which was less transparent than the remainder of the body. ‘The animal was living when obtained, and when placed in fresh sea-water gave evidence of life by a feeble irregular peristaltic contraction of the external muscular tunic, which increased on irritation; the proboscis was also protruded and retracted several times. The animal was about 4 centims. long and 2 broad, and 5 millims. in thickness. Hence its dimensions, and especially its thickness, render it unfavourable for a perfect examination of its structure under the microscope whilst in the entire con- dition. As only one specimen was procured, and as this was believed to be unique, no dissection was resorted to, excepting the removal of a small portion of the epidermis and external muscular tunic for microscopic examination. Hence the investigation of the structure of this Nemertine necessarily Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Ser. 4. Vol. xv. 12 166 Mr. H. N. Moseley on Pelagonemertes Rollestoni, remained an imperfect one, and the affinities of the animal amongst other Ronis could not be determined. The animal is leaf-like in shape, narrowing to a blunt point at the posterior extremity, and commencing abruptly at the anterior. The proboscis is protruded from the summit of a protuberance occupying the middle region of the anterior extremity. The mouth is situate on the ventral surface of the body, just posterior to the aperture for the proboscis. It is a simple aperture, with a plaited margin composed of five or six folds. It is the commencement of a short muscular tube, the cesophagus, which was seen to pass behind the most anterior prolongation of the main mesial digestive canal, but the communication of which with the latter was not traced. The digestive system stands out very conspicuously in the fresh condition of the animal, from being of the deep burnt- sienna colour already mentioned. It consists of a broad, flattened mesial canal, somewhat broadest in the middle region of the body, anteriorly ending in a bluntly terminated cecal prolongation, and posteriorly narrowing gradually. As the posterior part of the animal was somewhat injured, it could not be determined whether the canal terminates in an anus or not. The mesial canal receives on either side lateral tributaries in pairs, which tributaries remain simple for some distance of their horizontal course and then break up into ramifications. The most anterior pair of lateral canals is split up into by far the most ramifications. The ramifications become less and less in each pair towards the posterior extremity of the body, some of the most posterior lateral canals being simply bi- furcate, and one merely enlarged at the extremity. There are thirteen pairs of lateral canals in all. The nervous system was plainly seen in part. A pair of rounded ganglia lie on the ventral and lateral surface of the sheath of the proboscis, being a little posterior in position to the mouth. A commissure passes above the cesophagus and between it and the proboscis-sheath. From the ganglia a pair of fine simple nerve-cords pass in a curved course down to the posterior extremity, where their termination could not be ascertained. The cords cross ventrally the lateral digestive canals about the point where ramification commences. Further connexions of the ganglia could not be ascertained. The specimen obtained was a female. A series_of ovaries, consisting of pear-shaped masses of minute ova, were present, situate between each of the pairs of lateral digestive tubes, immediately external to the nerve-cord on each side. The masses of ova are contained in small cavities in the gelatinous: Mr. H. N. Moseley on Pelagonemertes Rollestoni. 167 internal body-tissue. When pressure was exerted, the ova issued from small corresponding apertures on the ventral surface, and the small empty cavities remained. The ova were spherical, about ‘28 millim. in diameter, and appeared composed of fat-globules and granular matter. The proboscis-sheath, which is wide and capacious, is very plainly seen on the dorsal aspect of the body, and dimly through the thickness of the body from the ventral aspect. It has a firm muscular attachment at its orifice; and bundles of muscular fibres (apparently retractor) are attached to it here on either side (Pl. XV. B. fig. B, 1). The proboscis itself is, when retracted, coiled up in the usual manner within its sheath, as seen in fig. D. It could unfortunately not be ascertained whether the proboscis is armed or not. It was never entirely retracted ; but a small portion of it always remained exserted. The outer surface of the body of the Nemertine is covered with a hyaline, very thin integument, which is thrown into numerous folds and wrinkles, which are so arranged along certain lines around small spaces nearly free from them as to produce on the surface of the body an appearance of a series of small polygonal areas separated by fine reticular . network (fig. D). ‘This condition of the surface was most conspicuous about the anterior part of the body; but the body was much lacerated by the meshes of the trawl, and therefore 1 cannot say whether the whole integument is in this condition in the fresh state or not. The folds and plaits in the integument are so sharp that they give the ap- pearance, under the microscope, of somewhat spindle-shaped bodies with sharply pointed extremities (fig. c, 1, 2,3). At first I supposed that these bodies were urticating organs re- sembling those of Bipalium; but on carefully teasing up a portion of the integument with fine needles, and being unable to isolate a single one, I concluded that they were mere folds. They are, however, of remarkable appearance, from their ex- treme abundance and the manner in which they cross each other at all angles. They are well preserved in glycerine oe Seta of the skin hardened in pieric acid. eneath the integument is some granular glandular matter. Immediately beneath the integument, and in close adherence to it, is the muscular tunic, evidently the homologue of the cutaneous muscular system of Bipaliwm and other Planarians. As in these, the outermost fibres are circular in direction, the inner longitudinal. The muscular tunic encloses the entire body. It is thin, and in the fresh condition of the animal transparent and in- conspicuous, but becomes opaque when the animal is hardened 12% 168 Mr. H. N. Moseley on Pelagonemertes Rollestoni. in picrie acid. The inner longitudinal layer consists of stout bands of fibres running parallel to one another. ‘The outer circular fibres are far less developed, and are not gathered into bundles, but cross one another slightly obliquely in their transverse course, forming a slight meshwork over the longi- tudinal fibres. Beneath the muscular tunic and between its meshes the body mass is filled up with a gelatinous hyaline structureless matter, imbedded in which lie the viscera and the muscles attached about the orifice of the sheath of the proboscis. Internal muscles, except those referred to, were not observed. No eyes or other sense-organs were found; and ciliated sacs were not seen. From the circumstance of the only specimen of Pelago- nemertes having been much lacerated, and from the animal not having been dissected, it will of course require further examination. In the specimen as procured there was a dee constriction of the body at about the junction of the first wit the second fourth of its length. This, it appeared pretty evidently, had been caused by the meshes of the net. The posterior extremity was somewhat injured, and its form may not be quite correctly given. Ciliated sacs may be present; and the structure of the proboscis might throw light on the affinities of the animal. The form of the digestive system is the most remarkable feature about Pelagonemertes, in its close resemblance to that of Dendrocela. In other respects Pelagonemertes is thoroughly Nemertine in structure, being merely modified for pelagic existence. It is remarkable that the gelatinous hyaline mass of the body is not tegumental in character, but apparently homogeneous with internal structures. The occurrence of a peculiar burnt-sienna colour in many very different pelagic animals is remarkable. With many the colouring may be explained as protective resemblance to the oceanic seaweeds. For its occurrence in others, such as Salpa and Pelagonemertes, in an otherwise hyaline body, there may be some common cause, possibly also protective. Diagnosis of the Genus Pelagonemertes, H. N, M,: Body leaf-shaped, gelatinous, hyaline. The anterior extremity of the body broad and abrupt, the posterior narrowed to a point, The digestive canal with thirteen pairs of lateral ramifications, as in Dendroceela. Integument thin and hyaline, with a thin muscular tunic immediately beneath it, consisting of external circular and internal longitudinal fibres. The animal free- swimming, oceanic, = On the Submarine-Cable Fauna. 169 EXPLANATION OF PLATE XV. B. Fig. a. Pelagonemertes Rollestoni, from the ventral surface. x 2 diameters. 1, mouth, with cesophagus; 2, partly protruded proboscis ; 3, nerve-ganglia; 4, nerve-cords; 5, ovaries; 6, digestive canal. The sheath of the proboscis is seen through the body lying behind the digestive canal. Fig. B. Sketch of the proboscis-sheath and contained retracted proboscis, from the dorsal aspect: 1, retractor muscles inserted into the commencement of the sheath. fig. c. 1, one of the polygonal areas, enlarged, showing the wrinkles of integument producing the appearance; 2, peculiar appearance of some of the folds of the integument. Fig. p. Reticular appearance of the integument observed in certain parts of the body. Natural size. XX1.—Submarine-Cable Fauna. By J. Gwyn JEFFREYS, LL.D., F.R.S., and the Rev. A. M. Norman, M.A. [Plate XII.] A NOVEL and unusual method of collecting specimens of the marine Invertebrate fauna is by means of the telegraph- cables which are laid down along so many of the great ocean highways. These cables occasionally need repairs, and must be taken up for that purpose. An opportunity has lately occurred, through the kindness of Sir James Anderson, of observing the animals which were found attached to the Falmouth-and-Lisbon cable, laid in June 1870, and taken up last autumn for repairs between N. lat. 47° 58’ and 47° 35', and in W. long. 7° 6', at depths ranging from 89 to 205 fathoms on the edge of soundings; bottom sandy. Such depths are now not considered great; but the ground seems to have been hitherto unexplored by the dredge. .The accuracy of the communication made by Sir James Anderson is un- questionable, and differs in that respect from the informa- tion which misled M. Alphonse Milne-Edwards, when he published a list of the animals attached to a cable which was taken up several years ago between Cagliari and Bone. The Mollusca thus procured are interesting only for the sake of locality; they will be noticed by Mr. Jeffreys. An account of the other Invertebrates, including some new forms, will be given by Mr. Norman. 170) Dr. J. G. Jeffreys on Submarine- Cable Mollusca. Part I. MOLLUSCA. By J. Gwyn JEFFREYS. BRACHIOPODA. Terebratula caput-serpentis, Linné: a small valve. CONCHIFERA. Anomia ephippium, L., vars. sgquamula and aeuleata : living. Ostrea cochlear, Poli: living, and moulded on the cable. This may possibly be a variety of the polymorphous O. edulis, owing its peculiar shape and comparative absence of lamination to its remaining attached to corals and other cylindrical substances. I think O. rosacea, Deshayes, ought to be. united with O. cochlear, as it differs only in having a brighter colour. Pecten opercularis, L.: living. similis, Laskey : valves. Lima subauriculata, Montagu: valves. - Loscombii, ‘Turton : a fragment. Avicula hirundo, L.: living and attached to Sertularia. Mytilus phaseolinus, Philippi: a valve. Kellia suborbicularis, Mont. : living. Axinus cycladius, 8. Wood: a small valve. Cardium minimum, Ph.: a fragment. Astarte triangularis, Mont.: valves; having the inner margin notched or plain, irrespective of size and apparent age. Circe minima, Mont.: young, one living. Venus ovata, Pennant: valves. Tellina pusilla, Ph.: a valve. Mactra solida, L., var. elliptica: young, valves only. (ZASTROPODA. Cyclostrema nitens, Ph.: dead. Trochus millegranus, Ph.: dead, young. Rissoa soluta, Ph.: dead. Triforis perversa, L.: living and dead, young. PTEROPODA. Spirialis retroversus, Fleming, var. Jeffreysi: dead. Part Il. CRUSTACEA &c. By the Rev. A. M. Norman. CRUSTACEA. Ebalia ¢: small fragment of carapace, apparently Z. tubcrosa, Pemn. ye: Rey. A. M. Norman oa the Submarine-Cable Fauna. 171 Galathea Bate. Amphithopsis latipes (Sars) = Calliope Ossiani and C. Fingalli, B. & W.: abundant. Sars’s specific name has Betabanies of those of Bate and Westwood, whose C. Osstani and C. Fingalli are undoubtedly but one species. The late Axel Boeck * has placed this Amphipod in his genus Am- phithopsis, separating it from C. leviuscula, which remains the type of the genus Calliopius, Lilljeborg (= Calliope, 4 ?: fragment of carapace, [ think G. dispersa, B. & Gammaropsis erythrophthalmus, Lilljeborg,= Eurystheus ery- thropthalmus, B. & W.: one specimen. Probolium (=Montagua, Bate): fragment, too imperfect for identification. Aigina phasma (Montagu) = Protella phasma, Bate, Munna: fragment. Loxoconcha multifora (Norman). Cytheropteron nodosum, Brady. Schlerochilus contortus (Norman). Paradoxostoma variabile (Baird), ensiforme, Brady. POLYZOA. Diastopora obelia (Fleming). Idmonea atlantica, Forbes. Salicornaria farciminoides (Ellis & Sol.). Hippothoa catenularia (Jameson). divaricata, Lamx. The typical form. divaricata, var. carinata, Norman. PI. XII. figs. 4-7. A remarkable form, procured from this source, oo which I have also dredged in Birterbuy Bay, is worthy of a name, and is figured (Pl. XII. figs.4-7). It has all the cells, as well as the intercellular tubules, strongly carinated, and * The death of this able Scandinavian naturalist at an early age is a at loss to science. His contributions to the study of the Crustacea phipoda and Copepoda are all most valuable. The prodromus (‘Crus- tacea Amphipoda borealia et arctica’) which he published in 1870 marks a new starting-point in the investigation of this subclass, and contains by far the most scientific arrangement of the sessile-eyed Crustacea which has as yet appeared. The first part of his larger work, ‘ De Skandinayiske og Arktiske Amphipoder,’ 1872, raised hopes of a most complete mono- graph on the subject on which it treats; but death has stepped in to rob us of the fulfilment of those hopes. Herr Axel Boeck’s executors inform me that the MS. and drawings will be, it is hoped, capable of arrange- ment so as to allow the issue of a second part of this Monograph; but although a mass of other drawings remain, there are not the MS. or notes to enable them to be utilized. 172 Rev. A. M. Norman on thus presents as strongly marked features as many of the allied so-called species of Hippothoa, Eschara rosacea, Busk. Lepralia ventricosa, Hassall. microstoma, Norman. ciliata (Linn.). innominata, Couch. Brongniartit (Aud.). ECHINODERMATA. Antedon rosaceus (Linck) : fragment. Echinocyamus angulosus, Leske. HypDr0zoA. Eudendrium rameum, Pallas. Genus AcrYPTOLARIA, Norman, n. g. Zoophyte ramose, irregularly branched, branches composed of several tubes; hydrothece rather distant, subspirally or alternately arranged, tubular, not contracted at the base and prolonged into the branch itself ; mouth somewhat patulous. Acryptolaria exserta (Busk), = Cryptolaria exserta, Busk, Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci. vol. vi. (1858), p. 130, pl. xix. fig. 3. Pl. XII. figs. 1 & 2. In the fifth volume of the ‘Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci.’ p. 173, pl. xvi., Busk established a genus Cryptolaria for the reception of a New-Zealand Hydrozoon, which had the peculiarity of having the “ cells completely immersed in a cylindrical poly- pidom composed of numerous tubes.” In the following year he described another Hydroid from Madeira under the name Cryptolaria exserta ; but this species was devoid of the ve characters on which the genus Cryptolaria had been established, the hydrothece being much exserted, and standing out at a conatdeestile angle from the stem. Many specimens of this Madeiran form are among the cable-scrapings ; and they agree in every respect with Busk’s description and figures, except that they are much less regularly branched than is represented in his plate xix. fig. 3. It is impossible that this species can remain in the same genus with C. prima; and I therefore con- stitute a new genus, of which it will be the type. It seems to find its nearest relation in Grammaria abietina (Sars) , a species which I cannot think Mr. Hincks has done right in placing in the genus Salacia of Lamouroux, the type of which has the Submarine-Cable Fauna. 173 the hydrothecw in regular verticils, and the branchlets con- tracted in a very remarkable manner at their junction with the branches. Genus Scapus, Norman, n. g. Zoophyte in the form of a spongious mass rolled in cylin- drical form round the stems of branching Hydrozoa (Acrypto- laria), and consisting of a series of somewhat closely packed subquadrate hydrothece, closed in above, except at the centre, where the np har gn projected in the form of a short, simple, cylindrical horny tube. Scapus tubulifer, Norman,n. sp. Pl. XII. fig. 1, a, & fig. 3. Zoophyte growing in little roll-like masses round the larger stems of Acryptolaria exserta (Busk), almost every specimen of which was the bearer of this parasitic species, though none of the other zoophytes procured at the same time and place showed a vestige of it. The roll-like mass has a soft spongious character, the external crust being harder. It consists of a large number of hydrothece, which, on a section being made, prove to be subquadrate in form, and packed closely together without any interspaces; the hydro- theca is closed in above except at the centre, where it is raised in the form of a short tubular orifice, rising from the mass of the hydrozoary ; this tube is often slightly, but never much bent. At first sight this species bears a strong resemblance to Coppinia arcta, from which, however, we at once know it by the more elongated and delicate character of the rolls and by the much shorter tubuli. In organic structure, however, the two species are very distinct from each other. In Cop- pinia the basal mass consists of chitinous cells rendered polygonal by mutual pressure, these cells are the gonothece ; while the slender-tubed hydrothece pass through the mass to the base of the hydrozoary, and are of equal diameter from the base to their free extremities (see a paper on the structure of Coppinia by Allman, Brit. Assoc. Report, 1868, p. 87, published subsequently to Hincks’s work). In Scapus the basal mass consists of the hydrothecz, which are bottle-shaped, expanded below and forming the mass, and contracted above into narrow projecting tubes. Sertularella polyzonias (Linn.). Gayt (Lamx.). Diphasia pinaster (Ellis & Sol.). alata (Hincks). 174 Rev. A. M. Norman on Thuiaria articulata (Pallas). Aglaophenia tubulifera (Hincks). myrtophyllum (Linn.). FORAMINIFERA. Cornuspira foliacea, Philippi: the form tnvolvens. Triloculina trigonula, forma angulata, Karrer, Sitzungsb. d. k. Akad. d. W. math.-naturw. Cl. Bd. iv. Abth. 1, 1867, pl. ii. fig. 6. The only 7riloculina found seems referable to the angulata of Karrer, which is certainly not worth distinguishing by a name, but is so far interesting that it is a representative near our shores of a group of so-called species which have received names from D’Orbigny, Reuss, Karrer, &c. Quinqueloculina subrotunda (Montagu). Valvulina conica, D’Orb. Lagena Lyellii, Seguenza. Mr. UW. B. Brady figures this form, Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 4, vol. vi. pl. xi. fig. 7. It is undoubtedly nothing more than a separated single cell of a form of Nodosaria scalaris, Batsch. I have a series which completely proves this statement. marginata, W. & J. Nodosaria scalaris, Batsch. Cristellaria rotulata, Lamk. Polymorphina lactea, W. & J. compressa, D’Orb. Uvigerina angulosa, Will. trregularis, H. B. Brady, Nat. Hist. Trans. Northumb. and Durham, vol. i. (1867), p. 100, pl. xii. fig. 5. A single and not well-marked specimen has been submitted to Mr. H. B. Brady, who has confirmed my opinion in referring it to this form. Orbulina universa, D’Orb. Globigerina bulloides, D’Orb. inflata, D’Orb. Foram. Canar. p. 134, pl. i. figs. 7-9 ; Parker and Jones, Phil. Trans. 1865, p. 367, pl. xvi. figs. 16&17. Now first recorded as occurring so near our shores; but I have previously found it abundantly in sand from 112 fathoms dredged, in Mr. Jeffreys’s yacht ‘The Osprey’ in 1870, 30 miles west of Valentia Island. Textularia sagittula, Defrance. pygmea, D’Orb. — abbreviata, D’Orb. Foram. Foss. Vienna, p. 249, pl. xv. figs. 7-12; Parker and Jones, Phil. Trans. 1865, p. 369, pl. xvii. fig. 76. —— agglutinans, D’Orb. Foram. Cuba, p. 144, pl. i. figs. 17 the Submarine- Cable Fauna. 175 & 18; Parker and Jones, Phil. Trans. 1865, p. 369, pl. xv fig. 21. I have previously found both this and the last species in the very fine collection of British Foraminifera bequeathed to me by my late friend Mr. E. Waller; the specimens are from off Valentia Island. 7. agglutinans I have also from my Shetland dredgings. Bulimina Buchiana, D’Orb. Foram. Foss. Vienna, p. 186, pl. xi. figs. 15-18; Parker and Jones, Phil. Trans. 1865, p- 374, pl. xvii. fig. 71: abundant. This strongly cha- racterized species is also in the Waller collection, from 112 fathoms, off Valentia. punctata, D’Orb. Discorbina globularis, D’Orb. Planorbulina Haidingerii, D’ Orb. Truncatulina lobatula, Walker. refulgens, Montfort. Planulina ariminensis, D’Orb.; Parker, Jones, and Brady, Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 4, vol. viii. pl. xii. fig. 131. Several specimens of this highly interesting Mediterranean form. Anomalina coronata, Parker & Jones. Pulvinulina repanda, F. & M. elegans, D’Orb. —— Micheliniana, D’Orb. Mém. Soc. Géol. de France, vol. iv. pl. iu. figs. 1-3; Parker and Jones, Phil. Trans. 1865, p- 369, pl. xiv. fig. 16, & pl. xvi. figs. 41-43. British ex- amples of this very gibbous Pulvinulina were previously in my collection from Shetland and also Valentia (Waller's collection). canariensis, D’Orb. Foram. Canar. pl. i. figs. 34-36 ; Parker and Jones, Phil. Trans. 1865, p. 395, pl. xvi. figs. 47-49. Menardii, D’Orb. Modéles, no. 10; Parker and Jones, Phil. Trans. 1865, p. 394, pl. xvi. figs. 35-37. Rotalina orbicularis, D’Orb. Polytrema miniaceum, Linn.,= Millepora miniacea, Linn.,1789, Syst. Nat. edit. 12 (Gmelin), vi. p. 3784, = Polytrema coral- lina, Risso, Hist. Nat. de Europe Mérid. p. 340, pl. v. figs. 45,46; Millepora rubra, Lamk. ii. p. 202. no. 8; Polytrema rubra, Carpenter, Introd. Study Foram. p. 235, pl. xiii. figs. 18-20. A young specimen growing on a valve of Pecten. It is very interesting finding this remarkable Mediterranean Foraminifer so near our coast. The genus Polytrema was established by Risso, not by Blainville, who is credited with it by Carpenter. Operculina ammonoides, Gron. 176 On the Submarine-Cable Fauna. PORIFERA. Small fragments of a sponge occurred on the stems of a zoophyte. Not recognizing it, I forwarded it to Dr. Bower- von who pronounced it new, and has characterized it as below. There was also a mass of siliceous root-fibres, re- minding one strongly of those of Holtenia Carpenteri; but they are not referable to that species, inasmuch as there were no he spined spicules (vide Thomson’s plate Ixviii. fig. 5), and the simple spicules were of two sizes—the one much larger than those of H. Carpenter?, the other very much more slender. Iam not able, therefore, to refer this ‘ beard” to any known sponge. I should add, however, that Dr. Bowerbank thinks they belong to Holtenta; but I cannot agree with him, for the reasons | have stated, in thinking so. “ Tsodictya funalis, Bowerbank, n. sp. ‘Sponge massive, sessile. Surface smooth, but uneven. Oscula simple, dispersed, minute. Pores inconspicuous. Dermal membrane pellucid, spiculous ; tension-spicula acerate, slender, subfasciculate, rather few in number ; retentive spicula bi- and tridentate equianchorate, rather few in number, and rarely palmato-tridentate equianchorate; also simple and contort bihamate spicula, minute and very slender, rather few in number. Skeleton: spicula acuate, stout, rather short, basally incipiently spinous; primary lines tri- or quadrispicu- lous, rarely more ; secondary lines mostly unispiculous, rarely more than bispiculous. Interstitial membranes sparingly spiculous ; spicula same as those of the dermal membrane. ‘Colour, in the dried state, milk-white. “Fab. On one of the Atlantic cables, 150 miles from the Land’s End (Sir James Anderson). “‘ Examined in the dried state.” EXPLANATION OF PLATE XII. Fig. 1. Acryptolaria exserta, Busk, with Scapus tubulifer, Norman, para- sitic at a: natural size. Fig. 2. A portion of Acryptolaria exserta, magnified. Fig. 3. A portion of the surface of Scapus tubulifer, Norman, meats Figs. 4-7. Hippothoa divaricata, var. carinata, Norman, magnified. OO On new Species of Silurian Polyzoa. 177 XXI1.—Deseriptions of new Species of Polyzoa from the Lower and Upper Silurian Locks of North America. By H. ALLEYNE NicHoLson, M.D., D.Sc., F.R.S.E., Professor of Biology in the Durham University College of Physical Science, Newcastle-on-Tyne. [Plate XIV.] HAVING in a former communication described the species of Alecto and Hippothoa which have come under my notice as occurring in the Cincinnati Group (Lower Silurian) of Ohio, T have now to describe from the same formation several species of Prtlodictya and one of Ceramopora, which I have been able to determine, from the collections submitted to me by Mr. U. P. James and Prof. Edward Orton, and all of which appear to be new. I have also an interesting species of Fenestella to describe, from the Upper Silurian (Guelph division of the Niagara formation) of the State of Ohio. 1. Ptilodictya faleiformis, Nich. Pl. XIV. figs. 1-16. Polyzoary consisting of a single, unbranched, or slightly branched, elongated, flattened and two-edged frond, the form of which is curved or falciform, and which gradually expands from a pointed base till it reaches a width of two lines within a distance of less than half an inch above the base. The total length may exceed two inches; but the width, in typical ex- amples, rarely exceeds two and a half lines. ‘The transverse section is acutely elliptical, the thickness in the middle not exceeding half a line; and the flat faces of the frond are very gently curved and not angulated. A central laminar axis, though often undemonstrable, can sometimes be clearly shown to exist. The edges of the frond are thin and sharp, formed by a narrow band, which is marked with longitudinal or slightly oblique strize and by the apertures of minute imperfect cells. Both sides of the frond are celluliferous, the cells being apparently perpendicular to the surface, and being arranged in intersecting diagonal lines, which form angles of about 30° with the sides of the frond, and thus cut one another at about 60°. The mouths of the cells are oval or somewhat diamond-shaped, their long axis coinciding with that of the frond, alternately placed in contiguous rows, about eight in the space of one line measured diagonally ; the outer- most rows very slightly smaller than the others. Walls of the cells moderately thick ; no surface-granulations, tubercles, spines, or elevated lines. The mouths of the cells parallel with the general surface, neither lip being especially prominent, and the plane of the aperture not being oblique. 178 Dr. H. A. Nicholson on new Species of Polyzoa As a general rule the polyzoary is simple, unbranched, and falciform. I have seen, however, in the fine collection of Mr. Dyer, of Cincinnati, some specimens in which the frond bifurcates at its distal extremity, and at least one example in which it splits into three divisions. I have also seen examples of what may probably prove to be a distinct species, in which the frond is very much wider than is normally the case. This beautiful species is allied to Ptclodictya (Escharopora) recta, Hall, on the one hand, and to P. lanceolata, Goldf., P. gladiola, Billings, and P. sulcata, Billings, on the other hand. The specimens from which the above description is taken were sent to me with the label of Hscharopora recta attached to them; and at first sight they certainly closely resemble this species, especially in the disposition of the cells in intersecting diagonals of great regularity. It is certain, however, that they are distinct from Hall’s species—the chief differences consisting in the fact that the frond of P. faletformis is greatly flattened, so that the transverse section is acutely elliptical instead of being “cylindrical or subcylindrical,” whilst the edges are sharp and non-celluliferous, and the entire frond is regularly curved and sabre-shaped instead of being straight. Hall states that Lscharopora recta is not branched, but possesses root-like processes. i udging, however, from his figures, it would seem probable that his specimens have been drawn and described in an inverted position, and that this form is in reality dichotomously branched (Pal. N. Y. vol. i. pl. xxvi. fig. 1 a). From Ptilodictya lanceolata, Goldf. (Petref. pl. xxxvii. fig. 2), the present species is readily distinguished, more especially by the MipheiGie of the cells, which are in regularly intersecting diagonal lines ; whereas in the former there is a central series of longitudinally arranged cells, flanked on each side by diagonal rows directed like the barbs of a feather. With Ptilodictya gladiola, Billings (Cat. Sil. Foss. of Anti- costi, p. 10), our species agrees in the shape of the frond; but it is proportionally twice as wide, whilst the cells are oval instead of being rectangular or oblong, and are disposed in decussating diagonals instead of in regular longitudinal lines as in the former. Lastly, Ptilodictya sulcata, Billings (loc. cit. p. 35), whilst resembling P. falctformis in shape, is distinguished by the nearly square cells with intercellular sulci, and by the fact that the cells are arranged in longitudinal lines. Locality and Formation.—Not uncommon in the Cincinnati Group, near Cincinnati, Ohio. Collected by Mr. U. P. James, — i from the Silurian Rocks of North America. 179 2. Ptilodictya emacerata, Nich. Pl. XIV. figs. 2-26. Polyzoary consisting of minute, narrow, linear fronds, which branch dichotomously, and have the form of a much flattened, acutely pointed ellipse in transverse section. Width one third of a line; length of largest specimen observed two lines. Cells elliptical, their long axes corresponding with that of the branches, about six or seven in the space of one line measured longitudinally. There are four, five, or rarely six rows of cells in the frond. When four rows of cells are present, two of these (in the centre) are longitudinal, and one row on each side is composed of cells directed in an obliquely ascending manner. When there are five rows, as is most commonly the case, the three central ones are longitudinal and a lateral row on each side is oblique. When there are six rows, two central ones are longitudinal and two on each side oblique. The cell-mouths are much longer than wide, and each row is separated from the next by an elevated line. The lateral margin of the frond on each side forms an obtuse non- celluliferous edge, the width of which is so small that it cannot always be detected. A central axis was not clearly determined, but is doubtless present. The only previously recorded species of the genus to which Ptilodictya emacerata presents any close resemblance is P. fragilis, Billings, from strata of the same age in Anticosti (Cat. Sil. Foss. of Anticosti, p. 9). Our species, however, is distinguished from the latter by its uniformly more minute dimensions, the smaller number of rows of cells in the frond, and the possession in general of no more than a single row of oblique cells on each side. P. fragilis, on the other hand, has a width of from two thirds of a line to one line, with from eight to ten rows of cells, and two or three rows of oblique marginal cells on each side. It is possible our form is only a variety of P. fragilis ; but in the absence of figures of the latter, and in the face of the differences above mentioned, I think it safest to regard P. emacerata as a distinct species. Locality and Formation.—Cincinnati Group, near Cincin- nati, Ohio. Collected by Mr. U. P. James. 3. Ptilodictya flagellum, Nich. Pl. XIV. figs. 3-3 6. Polyzoary consisting of a single, narrow, unbranched, two- edged, flattened frond, which has an acutely elliptical section. The frond commences at an attenuated base, and gradually ex- pands till a width of one line is reached, the total length of the 180 Dr. H. A. Nicholson on new Species of Polyzoa only specimen examined being eight lines. The general form of the frond is falciform, but towards the base it is alternately bent from side to side in a flexuous manner. The cells are arranged in longitudinal rows, about ten rows in the space of one line, the cells of contiguous rows alternating with one another. The cell-mouths, where most perfect, are narrow and long-oval—where worn, subcircular ; and the rows of cells are separated by strongly elevated longitudinal ridges. The non-celluliferous margins of the frond are inconspicuous ; and the central axis, though doubtless present, was not clearly determined. This species most nearly resembles Ptilodictya gladiola, Billings, from which it is distisiraistiod by its much smaller size and less width, and by its flexuous form. From P. falei- formis, Nich., itis separated not only by the above characters, but also by the longitudinal arrangement of the cells. Locality and Formation.—Cincinnati Group, Lebanon, Ohio, immediately below the horizon of Streptelasma corni- culum. Collected by Prof. Edward Orton and Mr. W. Bean. 4. Ptilodictya (?) arctipora, Nich. Pl. XIV. figs. 4-40. Polyzoary forming a cylindrical, slightly branched frond, which is not sharp-edged, exhibits no non-celluliferous borders and shows no traces of a central laminar axis. Cells arranged in obscurely longitudinal alternating rows, apparently perpen- dicular to the surface, and radiating in all directions from an imaginary axis. Cell-mouths very much compressed, much longer than wide, expanded below and attenuated superiorly, where they are often somewhat twisted and bent. Upon the whole, the cells are pyriform in shape, with their narrow ends directed upwards, about eight occupying the space of one line measured vertically, and twelve the same space measured diagonally. The cells are not always in contact, especially in their upper portion ; and their borders are always distinctly marked off by impressed lines; but they are not arranged between elevated longitudinal ridges. ‘The margins of the cells are very thick and conspicuous, not granulated, tubercu- lated, or spinigerous. The best-preserved fragment examined had a length of eight and a half lines, dividing at its summit into two branches, its diameter being rather more than one third of a line. From its cylindrical form, and the absence of a laminar axis or of non-poriferous margins, it would seem certain that this singular form is not a Pulodictya ; but | am at a loss to know where it should properly be placed, its extreme minuteness Srom the Silurian Rocks of North America. 181 rendering its genes affinities very uncertain, owing to the impossibility of making out the details of its internal structure. It has, however, some affinity with Ptilodictya (?) raripora, Hall, from the Clinton Group; and I have therefore referred it provisionally to this genus. Locality and Formation.—Cincinnati Group, near Cincin- nati, Ohio. Collected by Mr. U. P. James, 5. Ptilodictya fenestelliformis, Nich. Pl. XIV. figs. 5-5. Polyzoary palmate or subpalmate towards the base, dividing distally into small branches. © Basal expansion and branches flattened and sharp-edged, the branches being acutely elliptical in cross section, and about three fourths of a line in thickness centrally. Cells covering the whole surface on both sides, with the exception of the sharp lateral margins, which are non-celluliferous, as well as of certain non-porifeyous areas to be subsequently noticed. The cells on the two aspects of the flattened frond respectively have their bases separated by a thin laminar axis. The cells in the middle of the frond are about three eighths of a line in height, gradually diminishing towards the margins. Cell-mouths ovate, slightly longer than broad, arranged in longitudinal rows, alternate or subalternate in contiguous rows; about five cells in one line measured longitudinally, and six in the same space measured diagonally. The longitudinal spaces between the rows of cells are broad and slightly elevated, and are faintly striated longitudinally or obscurely punctate. On the other hand, the spaces between the ends of the cells are very much narrower; and the surface thus closely resembles that of a small Fenestella—the cell- mouths alae like “fenestrules,” the longitudinal interspac s between the cells representing the ‘‘interstices,” and the narrow spaces between the ends of the cells corresponding with the “ dissepiments.”’ The only specimens examined exhibit nu- merous, apparently solid, rounded or stellate areole, of an average diameter of two thirds of a line, which are not occu- pied by cells, but which exhibit an obscurely pitted surface. In its superficial characters this form might readily be taken for a Fenestella, whilst the character last mentioned gives it somewhat the aspect of certajn species of Chatetes (Monticu- lipora). Its internal structure, however, proves it beyond all question to be a genuine Ptilodictya ; and I am not acquainted with any other species of this genus with which it could be confounded. Locality and Formation.—Cincinnati Group, near Cincin- nati, Ohio. Collected by Mr. U. P. James. Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Ser.4. Vol. xv. 13 182. Dr. H. A. Nicholson on new Species of Polyzoa 6. Fenestella nervata, Nich. Pl. XIV. figs. 6, 6a. Frond fan-shaped (?), composed of narrow, closely approx- imated branches, about four or five of which occupy the space of one line. On the non-celluliferous side of the frond are two strong, slightly diverging, rounded ribs, about half a line in diameter, like the midribs of a multicostate leaf. From the sides of these ribs the branches spring obliquely, being directed in opposite directions on opposite sides of the rib, with which they make a very acute angle (10° or less). Fenestrules long sad narrow, nearly twice as long as wide, about three in the space of one line measured vertically, and about five in the same space measured transversely. For the most part the fenestrules do not alternate in contiguous rows, but are placed opposite one another. ‘The narrow rounded dissepiments are thus also placed nearly or quite opposite to one another. Branches faintly striated in a longitudinal direction. Cellu- liferous side unknown. The only example of this species that I have seen is im- perfect, and the ribs from which the branches rise are placed two lines apart near the base, and four lines apart near the summit. It would seem most probable that the ribs sprung from a common root, and that there were many of them in the perfect frond. The species is distinguished not only by the possession of these ribs, but also by the long narrow fenestrules, which are not placed alternately, but so disposed that the dissepiments connecting contiguous branches become opposite or subopposite. Locality and Formation.—Summit of the Niagara Forma- tion (in beds probably the equivalent of the Guelph Forma- tion of Canada), Cedarville, Southern Ohio. Collected by Prof. Edward Orton. 7. Ceramopora ohioensis, Nich. Pl. XIV. figs. 7-7 d. Polyzoary incrusting, forming thin expansions attached to the surface of Brachiopods and Corals, and consisting, typi- cally at any rate, of a single layer of oblique cells. Cells arranged in intersecting diagonal lines, and disposed in a somewhat concentric manner yound more or fewer central points; their upper walls thin and arched; the cell-mouths oblique and, when most perfect, semicircular in shape.. About eight cells in the space of one line. Such are the appearances presented by this fossil when quite perfect; and its examination in this condition leaves little doubt as to the propriety of placing it in Hall’s genus Srom the Silurian Rocks of North America. 183 Ceramopora. Worn examples, however, exhibit very different characters; and when the entire original surface has been abraded, it is sometimes difficult or impossible to determine whether or not one is dealing with this or some entirely dif- ferent form. When slightly worn, the appearances shown in fig. 7 a are exhibited. The delicate front wall of the cell has now dis- appeared ; and the cavity of the cell appears to be divided into two distinct compartments, a larger and a smaller, both of a somewhat triangular shape, by an oblique internal septum. Besides, other smaller cavities appear in the walls separating the different cells. When more deeply worn down, or under certain conditions not clearly understood, the cells (figs. 7¢ & 7d) appear in the form of rounded or oval apertures, arranged in diagonal rows, but separated by a vast number of small rounded foramina, which appear to be the mouths of interstitial tubuli. In this condition the fossil presents much the appearance of certain species of Chetetes (Monticulipora). The best examples of this singular Polyzoon that I have seen, grow in the form of thin crusts, rarely exceeding one fourth of a line in thickness, upon Strophomena alternata, Conrad, and upon various species of Chetetes. In some ex- amples it would seem that several layers of cells are super- imposed on one another; but I am not sure of the nature of these specimens. Not uncommonly the cells are concentrically disposed round a number of irregular areol, each of which 1s formed by a number of cells radiating from a central point. Young examples form circular crusts, with a slightly cupped centre, from which the cells radiate in every direction (fig. 7 0). Lastly, examples are not uncommon which appear to have the form of small branching stems. Some of these certainly are merely constituted by thin crusts growing upon various ramose species of Chetetes. Others, however, appear to be entirely composed of the Polyzoon itself; and it is possible that these will eventually prove to be a distinct species. Locality and Formation.—Cincinnati Group, near Cincin- nati, Ohio. Collected by Mr. U. P. James. EXPLANATION OF PLATE XIV. Fig. 1. Ptilodictya falciformis, Nich., a small example, of the natural size. la. Transverse section of the frond, enlarged. 146, Small portion of the surface, greatly enlarged. Fig. 2. Ptilodictya emacerata, Nich., of the natural size. 2a. Transverse section of the frond, enlarged. 246. Portion of the surface, greatly enlarged. 13* 184 Rev. T. R. R. Stebbing on new Fig. 8. Ptilodictya flagellum, Nich., of the natural size. 3a. Transverse section of the same, enlarged. 3%. Portion of the surface, enlarged. Fig. 4. Ptilodictya (?) arctipora, Nich., a fragment, of the natural size. 4a. Portion of the same, enlarged. 40. A few cells of the same, enlarged further. Fig. 5. Ptilodictya Soacateliiforsnss, Nich., a fragment near the base of the frond, of the natural size. 5a. Transverse section of the same, enlarged. 56. Portion of the surface, showing one of the non-poriferous areolz, enlarged. Fig. 6. Fenestella nervata, Nich. a fragment, of the natural size. Ga. Portion of the same, enlarged. Fig. 7. Ceramopora ohioensis, Nich., part of an incrusting specimen, greatly enlarged. 7a. A few cells from a worn specimen of the same, greatly enlarged. 7b. Portion of a young example of the same, showing the radiating growth of the cells from a central point, enlarged. 7e¢ & 7d. Fragments of much-worn specimens of the same (?), showing numerous interstitial tubuli, enlarged. XXITI.—On some new exotic Sessile-eyed Crustaceans. By the Rev. Tuomas R. R. Sresprna, M.A. [Plate XV. A.] I. Or the Crustaceans now to be described, the first is a small Amphipod sent to me by H. J. Carter, Esq., F.R.S., who found three specimens of it in a sponge, a branched Suberite, from the Antarctic sea, dredged up by Sir J. Ross in §. lat. about 774° and E. long. 175°, from a depth of 300 fathoms. Two of the specimens are about an eighth of an inch in length, the third being very much smaller. Whether the larger pair had attained their full size or not is open to uestion. All are of a dark-brown colour—in that respect, Mr. Carter tells me, resembling the sponge from which he took them. All were closely coiled up, with the gnathopods hidden and tail and antenne tucked under the body. This posture, coupled with the breadth of the pereion or thorax, gave the creatures a subglobose aspect, at the first glance not a little resembling that of afolded Spheromid. In point of fact, however, their affinities seem to be with the genus Dexamine, Leach. The superior antenne have the first joint stout, the second more slender and twice as long, the third not differing from the following articulations of the flagellum. In the lower antennze only two of the joints of the peduncle could be made out distinctly, being probably the penultimate and exotic Sessile-eyed Crustaceans. 185 antepenultimate—the former being more slender than the latter, but in length subequal both to it and to the second joint of the upper antenne. The flagellum of the upper antenne is longer and stouter than that of the lower. In the first and second gnathopods the wrists and hands are hairy; the wrist in each case is about equal in length to the hand. he hand in the first gnathopods is subovate in shape, with no distinct palm, and the finger projecting rather prominently. In the second gnathopods the hand is rather larger, with a fairly defined palm, upon which the finger folds down without overlapping it. In the five following pairs of legs (the pereiopoda) the fingers are all directed backwards, a character which Mr. Spence Bate notes as generally pre- vailing in the genus Dexamine. It is these five pairs of pereiopoda which are the most peculiar and distinctive parts of the animal. ‘They are all alike, with the exception of the coxal joints; and as far as could be made out, they are all equal. The thighs are well developed both in breadth and length. The metacarpal joints are also long, about equalling the wrist and hand conjointly. Long spines are attached to the postero-distal extremity of the wrist. The hands are prehensile, a much-curved finger being opposed to the outer point of an excavated palm. In the actual state of the spe- cimens it was not, however, possible to decide whether the palm terminated in two points with a central spine, or in one point with a spine on either side. There seemed to be an additional spine within the palm close to the base of the finger. The telson is long, lanceolate, and deeply cleft. The coxal joints are figured as they appeared ; but those of the first three pairs of pereiopoda were not well preserved, and in a normal state are probably less irregular in shape than those which I have drawn. The specimens have a very noticeable metallic lustre. Unless a new genus should be thought wanting, on account of the prehensile feet of the pereiopoda, Dexamine antarctica will be an appropriate name for this minute novelty. II. The next species to be described, also minute and also new, comes from Algoa Bay, South Africa. It travelled to England with the same collection of sponges and Gorgonias which supplied the Arcturide described in the ‘Annals’ for August 1873. There can be little doubt that it ought to be referred to the genus Seba, founded by Costa fora Neapolitan species, which Mr. Spence Bate has described and figured in his British-Museum Catalogue, stating that “ the descriptions of both the genus and species, as well as the figure, are taken 186 Rey. T. R. R. Stebbing on new from a figure given in a memoir in the possession of Professor Milne-Edwards.” That the first species of Seba should be taken on the coast of Naples, while the second comes from South Africa, suggests the reflection that there must be whole armies of sessile-eyed crustaceans yet to be discovered. The generic characters given for Seba are as follows :— “Slender, smooth; antenne long, subequal; cox small, four anterior deeper than the three posterior; gnathopoda uniform, subequal, chelate.” The new species agrees with Seba tnnominata in all these respects, except that the an- teune (at least in my specimen, which may be a very young one) are not very long, and that the gnathopods, though agreeing in general character, are not precisely uniform. The first are shorter than the second; they have the thighs more slender, the hands broader, and the intermediate joints notably of less length. In both the infero-anterior angle of the hand is produced, so as to be equal in length to the finger. The first gnathopod is given in the figure as it and its fellow appeared in the specimen; but the reversed position of the wrist, hand, and finger, pointing forwards imstead of back- wards, is not likely to be the natural position in the living animal. The last three pairs of pereiopoda differ from those of Seba innominata in having the thighs broad, in the last pair with a serrated edge, and in having the metacarpal joints strongly developed and overlapping the wrists. The telson is small; the caudal appendages short, the rami of the second pair ex- tending a little beyond those of the first and third. The name Sedge is Seba Saundersii, out of respect for W. Wilson aunders, Esq., F.R.S., for whom the marine treasures were collected among which this little stranger, about an eighth of an inch long, reached our shores. III. Out of the same sifting of sand and fragments which yielded the Seba came a tiny Isopod, only a twelfth of an inch in length, with a very striking resemblance, at first sight, to the figure of Cymodocea armata in Milne-Edwards’s ‘ Histoire Naturelle des Crustacés’ (pl. xxxi. fig. 16). The resemblance, however, is only one of general outline ; for whereas the striking feature in the Cymodocea is the triangular prolongation of the seventh segment of the thorax, in the new species it is the terminal segment of the abdomen or tail which is produced beyond the caudal appendages into a large conical tooth. The body is smooth, with scale-like markings visible under a lens over all parts of the skin. The abdomen is in two divisions, the first retaining indications of three segments sol- exotic Sessile-eyed Crustaceans. 187 dered together. The second division is nearly three times as long as the first, and for two thirds of its length is much in- flated ; it then becomes slightly constricted and considerably depressed. Of the caudal appendages the outer plate is much smaller than the inner both in length and ramen 8 and is oval in shape. The inner plate follows much the same curve along its free border ; but, where it closely adjoins the tail-segment ‘to which it is united, it has a slight concavity fitting the corre- sponding convexity of the tail-piece. On the underside of the animal a broad fold of this last tail-segment stretches the whole length of each side of it; beneath the narrower part of the segment the edges of these folds meet. There is a species of Spheroma (Spheroma Jurinit) described by Milne-Edwards from the Egyptian crustaceans of Savigny and Audouin, of which he says :—‘ This species appears to be very near to Spheroma serratum, but is distinguished from it by the form of the last segment of the abdomen, which is pro- longed backwards into an obtuse point. The external plate of the caudal appendages has its edge smooth. The length is about two lines.’’ ‘This, as far as it goes, might fairly suit the present species; but as nothing is said of the great dif- ference in size between the plates of the caudal appendages, which are in consequence very unlike those of Spharoma ser- ratum, there can be little doubt that the present is a distinct species, for which I propose the name of Spheroma algoense. It is scarcely of importance to mention that both this and Seba Saundersvi are light yellow in colour, since the colour may have faded or changed since the animals’ deaths. It may be remarked, too, that some of our English species of Spheroma are exceedingly variable in colour. IV. Before closing this paper, I may observe that along with the new species some very small specimens have pre- sented themselves of Arcturus lineatus, described and figured in the ‘Annals’ for August 1873, above referred to. The point demanding notice in reference to these young specimens is that the fourth segment of the thorax is not elongated as in adult life—a point the more interesting, because upon this character Milne-Edwards grounds a division of the genus Arc- turus into two sections :—one containing the large Arcturus Baffin from Baffin’s Bay, which has the segment in question not elongate ; the other containing the British Arcturus longi- cornis, Which has this one segment as long as all the other body-segments put together. Of these sections Goodsir made a genus Arcturus and a genus Leachia—a division obviously now inconvenient, since according to it our Arcturus lineatus 188 M. Anton Stuxberg on new would belong at one time of its life to the one and at another time to the other. EXPLANATION OF PLATE XV. A. Fig. 1. Dexamine antarctica, 1a. First gnathopod. 16, Second gnatho- pod. le, Third pereiopod. 1d. Hand and finger of third pereiopod, more highly magnified. Fig. 2. Seba Saundersii. 2a. First gnathopod. 2b. Second gnathopod. 2c. Fifth pereiopod. Fig. 3. Spheroma algoense. 3a. Underside of tail-piece. XXIV.—Descriptions of some new North-American Lithobioide. By ANTON STUXBERG. 1. Lithobius monticola, n. sp. Lamina cephalica subcircularis, eadem fere latitudine ac lon- gitudine, margine postico subrecto, setis punctisque im- pressis sparse predita. Antenne mediocres, articulis 20 maximam partem cylindraceis, setis rigidis vestitis compo- site. Oculi longitudine triplo majore quam altitudine, ocellis 7-9 in 2 series longitudinales weet Coxe pedum maxillarium secundi paris dentibus 6+6 conicis, acutiuscu- lis, nigerrimis armatee. Scuta dorsualia rugulosa, sparsis- sime pilosa, 2°, 4°, 6°, 7°, 9°, 11°, 13° margine postico recto, angulis posticis rectis vel rotundate rectangulis, 1°, 3°, 5e, 8°, 10°, 12°, 14° margine postico elevato sinuato, angulis parum productis, rotundate acuminatis. Scutwm ventrale 45 fovea longitudinali profundiore, cetera omnia plana. Port coxales numerosi, rotundi, in 3-4 series irregulares dispositi. Pedes primi paris calcaribus 2, 3,2. Pedum analium articulus primus calcaribus binis, altero majore in- feriore, altero minore laterali armatus. Pedes anales ungue singulo, calearibus 1,4,3,1—1,4,3,2 armati. Color non manifestus. Longitudo corporis 18 millim. Hab. in Sierra Nevada (G. Eisen). 2. Lithobius pusio, n. sp. Lamina cephalica subcircularis, eadem fere latitudine ac lon- gitudine, setis minimis sparsissimis. Antenne breviores, articulis 20 plerumque brevibus, crassis composite, ex quibus ultimus longissimus, longitudine quatuor prece- dentes junctos equans. Oculi ocellis 6 magnis in 2 series North-American Lithobioide. 189 (1 +3, 2) digestis. Coxe pedum maxillarium secundi paris sinu mediano lato et profundo, dentibus 5+ 5 validis nigris armate. Scuta dorsualia omnia angulis posticis rotundatis, 1°, 3°, 5°, 8°, 10°, 12°, 14° margine postico medio sinuato, 2°, 4°, 6°, 7°, 9°, 11°, 18° recto. Seuta ventralia plana. Port coxales 2, 3, 3, 2, rotundi(g). Pedes primi paris ealcaribus 1,1,1. Peduwm analium articulus primus cal- caribus binis, majore ventrali, minore laterali armatus. Pedes anales longissimi, subtenues, rigide et sparse setosi, ungue singulo, calcaribus 1, 3, 2,0 armati. Color dorsi non manitestus; caput castaneum, antennarum interiore =o nigra, exteriore pallidiore ; venter cum pedibus pal- ide griseus. Longitudo corporis 8-9 millim., antennarum 2°5-3 millim., edum analium 4 millim. Hab. in California ad San Francisco (G. Eisen). 3. Lithobius paradoxus, n. sp. Lamina cephalica subquadrata, latitudine paullo majore quam longitudine, margine postico elevato recto, setis magno intervallo distantibus vestita, glabra, evidentissime reticulata. Antenne magnitudine dimidiam corporis longitudinem fere eequantes, articulis 20 irrigue setosis, crassiusculis, compo- site. Oculi longitudine fere triplo majore quam altitudine, ocellis 8 in 4 series transversales (2, 2, 2,2) digestis. Core pedum maxillarium secundi paris dentibus 2+2 armate. Scuta dorsualia omnia angulis posticis rotundatis, 3°, 5°, 8°, 10°, 12°, 14° margine postico sinuato, 1°, 2°, 4°, 6°, 79, 9°, 11°, 13° recto. Scuta ventralia plana vel convexiuscula. Port coxales 1,2, 2,2 rotundi(¢). Pedes primi paris cal- caribus 1,2,1. Pedum analium articulus primus inermis. Pedes anales incrassati, ungue singulo, calearibus 1, 2, 1, 0 armati. Color brunneus, capite antennisque nigrioribus, scutis ventralibus cum pedibus, presertim analibus, palli- dioribus. Longitudo corporis 11 millim., antennarum 4-4°5 millim., pedum analium 3°5 millim. Hab. in California circa urbem San Pedro (G. Eisen). Species processu magno piloso quarti articuli pedum ana- lium ( ¢) insignis. 4. Lithobius obesus, n. sp. Lamina cephalica subquadrata, eadem fere longitudine ac lati- tudine, margine postico subrecto, setis longis rigidis parcius 190 M. Anton Stuxberg on new vestita. Antenne breviores, tertiam partem longitudinis corporis equantes, articulis 20 cylindraceis longe setosis composite, 6 interioribus longissimis, ultimo longitudine minore quam 3 precedentibus junctis. Oculi ellipsoidei, longitudine duplo majore quam altitudine, ocellis 10, postico magno transverso, allinsotdio, ceteris in 3 series digestis, ocello mediz seriei postico maximo, rotundo. Coxe pedum maxillarium eine paris dentibus 2+42 validis armate, marginibus antico-lateralibus setis 4—5 longissimis vestite, sinu mediano lato, haud profundo. Scuta dorsualia omnia angulis posticis rotundatis, 3°, 5°, 8°, 10°, 12°, 14° margine postico elevato sinuato, 1°, 2°, 4°, 6°, 7°, 9°, 11°, 13° recto, non elevato. Scuta ventralia omnia plana, posteriora pre- sertim dense pilosa. Port coxales 2, 3, 3, 3 rotundi (¢ ). Pedes primi paris calearibus 1, 2,1. Pedum analium arti- culus primus calcari singulo laterali minore (vix visibili) armatus. Pedes anales breves, plus vel minus incrassati, ungue singulo, calcaribus 1, 3, 2, 1 armati. Unguis geni- talium femineorum magnus, integer. Color : Longitudo corporis 13 millim., antennarum 5 millim., pedum analium 4 millim. Hab. in California ad Sauzelito haud procul ab urbe San Francisco (G. Hisen). Unum tantum specimen ( ? ) vidimus. 5. Lithobius Kochit, n. sp. Lamina cephalica obcordata, paullo latior quam longior, pilosa. Antenne breves, tertiam partem longitudinis corporis haud multo superantes, articulis 20 cylindraceis composite. Oculi ocellis 9, in 3 series longitudinales curvatas digestis (1+3, 3, 2). Coxe pedum maxillarium secundi paris dentibus 2+2armate. Scuta dorsualia omnia angulis posticis rectis vel rotundate rectangulis, marginibus valde elevatis. Port coxales 2,3, 3,3 rotundi(?). Pedes primi paris calearibus 0,1,1. Pedum analium articulus primus calcari singulo laterali armatus. Pedes anales breves, haud incrassati, lon- gitudine antennas zquantes, unguibus binis, calcaribus 1, 3, 2,0 armati. Unguis genitalium femineorum bilobus ; cal- carium duo paria. Color dorsi testaceo-brunneus. Longitudo corporis 11 millim., antennarum et pedum analium 4 millim. Hab. in California ad Sauzelito (G. Eisen). 6. Lithobius megaloporus, n. sp. Lamina cephalica obcordata, hirsuta, margine postico subrecto North-American Lithobioide. 191 elevato, parte antica sulco profundiore a postica sejuncta. Antenne perbreves, articulis 19-20 composite, ex quibus ultimus longissimus, tres antecedentes junctos longitudine equans, 2°, 3°, 8°, 9°, 10°, 14°, 15°, 16° mediocribus, ceteri latitudine duplo majore quam longitudine minimi. Ocul7 ocellis 7 magnis in 2 series (1+3,3) digestis. Coxe pedum maxillarium secundi paris dentibus 2+2—3+3 crassis, acumine nigris armate, sinu mediano lato, haud profundo. Scuta dorsualia 9™, 11%, 13 angulis productis, 2", 4™™, §um, 74™ margine postico recto, 14, 9"™ convexo, 3u™, 5um, Sum 10u, 12", 14"™sinuato. Scuta ventralia omnia, preser- tim marginibus, setis longis, magnis vestita, medii corporis sulco profundiore longitudinali mediano, laterali minore et breviore, ex angulo postico laterali excurrente. Port coxales 2, 2,1, 1, 1 maximi, rotundi. Pedes primi paris calcaribus 1,1,1. Pedum analium articulus primus calcaribus nullis, setis 2 longioribus, altera ventrali, altera laterali armatus. Pedes anales perbreves, longitudinem antennarum non assequentes, incrassati, ungue singulo, calcaribus 0, 1, 1, 0 armati. Color dorsi testaceo-brunneus, laminis ventralibus pedibusque pallidioribus. Longitudo corporis 12 millim., antennarum 4 millim., pedum analium 2°5 millim. Hab. in California ad San Francisco (G. Eisen). Species ab omnibus huc usque cognitis diversa; poris coxa- libus in pedum paribus 11°, 12°, 13°, 14°, 15° locatis. 7. Lithobius eucnemis, n. sp. Lamina cephalica obcordata, fere eque longa ac lata. Antenne longiores, dimidiam partem corporis longitudinis fere asse- quentes, articulis 20 (24) cylindraceis, rigide pilosis compo- site. Oculi ocellis 16 in 4 series curvatas digestis (1+4, 4,4,3). Coxe pedum maxillarium secundi paris dentibus 3+3armate. Scuta dorsualia 9™ angulis rotundatis, 11°™ et 13% angulis parum productis. Pord coxales 4, 5, 5, 4 rotundi. Pedes primi paris calearibus 1,2,1. Pedum analium arti- culus primus calcarisingulo laterali armatus. Pedes anales breviores, parum incrassati, unguibus binis, calcaribus 1, 3, 3,1. Unguis genitalium femineorum bilobus ; calcarium duo paria, exterius majus. Color castaneus vel brunneus. Longitudo corporis 13°5 millim., antennarum 6 millim., pedum analium 5 millim. Hab, in Mount Lebanon (G. Eisen). 192 Prof. Asa Gray on the Question 8. Lithobius Saussuret, n. sp.” Lamina cephalica obcordata, fere eque longa ac lata, lateribus semicirculariter rotundatis, levis, pilis sparsis vestita. An- tenner sat longe, corporis dimidiam longitudinem haud asse- quentes, articulis 27 parce setosis, ultimo penultimum lon- gitudine haud multo superante, composite. Ocul Coace pedum maxillarium secundi paris dentibus 5+5 nigerrimis, brevibus, validis armate, sinu mediano subpro- fundo. Scuta dorsualia anteriora Jevius, posteriora mani- festius rugulosa, at non granulata,subglabra, 98, 11%, 13¥™ angulis productis, 7°" margine postico medio profundesinuato. Port coxales 5,6, 7,6 magni, subrotundi. Pedes primi paris calearibus 2,3,2. Pedum analium articulus primus epee singulo, laterali armatus. Pedes anales breves, sat inflati, unguibus binis, calcaribus 1,3, 3,1 armati. Unguis geni- talium femineorum obsolete trilobus, lobo mediano laterales haud multo superante; calcarium duo paria. Color casta- neus vel brunneus. Longitudo corporis 23 millim., antennarum 9 millim., pedum analium 6-7 willim. Hab. in Mexico cirea urbem Orizaba (ZH. de Saussure). Unum tantum specimen ( ? ) vidimus. Upsala, February 10, 1875. XXV.—Do Varieties wear out, or tend to wear out? By Professor Asa GRaAy *. Turis question has been argued from time to time for more than half a century, and is far from being settled yet. Indeed it is not to be settled either way so easily as is sometimes thought. The result of a prolonged and rather lively discus- sion of the topic about forty years ago in England, in which Lindley bore a leading part on the negative side, was, if we rightly remember, that the nays had the best of the argument. The deniers could fairly well explain away the facts adduced by the other side, and evade the force of the reasons then assigned to prove that varieties were bound to die out in the course of time. But if the case were fully reargued now, it is by no means certain that the nays would win it. The most they could expect would be the Scotch verdict, “ not proven,”’—and this not because much, if any, additional evidence of the actual wearing out of any variety has turned up since, but because a * From Silliman’s ‘ American Journal,’ February 1875. of the Permanence of Varieties. 193 presumption has been raised under which the evidence would take a bias the other way. ‘There is now in the minds of scien- tific men some reason to expect that certain varieties would die out in the long run; and this might have an important influence upon the interpretation of the facts that would be brought forward. Curiously enough, however, the recent dis- cussions to which our attention has been called seem, on both sides, to have overlooked this matter. But, first of all, the question needs to be more specifically stated if any good is to come from a discussion of it. There are varieties and varieties. ‘They may, some of them, disap- aad or deteriorate, but yet not wear out—not come to an end rom any inherent cause. One might even say, the younger they are the less the chance of survival unless well-cared for. They may be smothered out by the adverse force of superior numbers; they are even more likely to be bred out of exist- ence by unprevented cross-fertilization, or to disappear from mere change of fashion. The question, however, is not so much about reversion to an ancestral state, or the falling off of a high- bred stock into an inferior condition. Of such cases it is enough to say that, when a variety or strain, of animal or vegetable, is led up to unusual fecundity, or size or product of any organ, for our good, and not for the good of the plant or ani- mal itself, it can be kept so only by high feeding and excep- tional care—and that with high feeding and artificial appliances come vastly increased liability to disease, which may practically annihilate the race. But then the race, like the burst boiler, could not be said to wear out; while if left to ordinary condi- tions, and allowed to degenerate back into a more natural, if less useful state, its hold on life would evidently be increased rather than diminished. As to natural varieties or races under normal conditions, sex- ually propagated, it could readily be shown that they are neither more nor less likely to disappear from any inherent cause than the species from which they originated. Whether species wear out, ze. have their rise, culmination, and decline from any inherent cause, is wholly a geological and very speculative problem, upon which, indeed, only vague conjectures can be offered. ‘The matter actually under discussion concerns culti- vated domesticated varieties only, and, as to plants, is covered by two questions. First, will races propagated by seed, being so fixed that they come true to seed, and purely bred (not crossed with any other sort), continue so indefinitely, or will they run out in time—not die out, perhaps, but lose their distinguishing characters ? Upon this, all we are able to say is that we know no reason why they 194 Prot. Asa Gray on the Question should wear out or deteriorate from any inherent cause. ‘The transient existence or the deterioration and disappearance of many such races is sufficiently accounted for otherwise—as, in the case of extraordinarily exuberant varieties, such as mam- moth fruits or roots, by increased liability to disease, — adverted to, or by the failure of the high teeding they demand. A common cause, in ordinary cases, is cross-breeding, through the agency of wind or insects, which is difficult to guard against. Or they go out of fashion and are superseded by others thought to be better; and so the old ones disappear. Or, finally, they may revert to an ancestral form. Asoffspring tend to resemble grandparents almost as much as parents, and as a line of close-bred ancestry is generally prepotent, so newly originated varieties have always a tendency to reversion. ‘This is pretty sure to show itself in some of the progeny of the earlier generations ; and the breeder has to guard against it by rigid selection. But the older the variety is (that is, the longer the series of generations in which it has come true from seed), the less the chance of reversion: for, now, to be like the imme- diate parents is also to be like a long line of ancestry ; and so all the influences concerned (that is, both parental and ancestral heritability) act in one and the same direction. So, since the older a race is the more reason it has to continue true, the presumption of the unlimited permanence of old races is very strong. Of course the race itself may give off new varieties; but that is no interference with the vitality of the original stock. If some of the new varieties supplant the old, that will not be because the unvaried stock is worn out or decrepit with age, but because in wild nature the newer forms are better adapted to the surroundings, or, under man’s care, better adapted to his wants or fancies. The second question, and one upon which the discussion about the wearing-out of varieties generally turns, is, Wil varieties propagated from buds (7. e. by division), grafts, bulbs, tubers, and the like necessarily deteriorate and die out? First, Do they die out as a matter of fact? Upon this the testi- mony has all along been conflicting. Andrew Knight was sure that they do; and there could hardly be a more trust- worthy witness. “The fact,” he says, fifty years ago, “ that certain varieties of some species of fruit which have been long culti- vated cannot now be made to grow in the same soils, and under the same mode of management which was a century ago so Ses successful, is placed beyond the reach of controversy. very experiment which seemed to afford the slightest pros- of the Permanence of Varieties. 195 pect of success was tried by myself and others to propagate the old varieties of the apple and pear which formerly consti- tuted the orchards of Herefordshire, without a single healthy or efficient tree having been obtained; and, I believe, all attempts to propagate these varieties have, during some years, wholly ceased to be made.” To this it was replied, in that and the next generation, that cultivated vines have been transmitted by perpetual division from the time of the Romans, and that several of the sorts, still prized and prolific, are well identified, among them the ancient Greecula (considered to be the modern Corinth or currant grape), which has immemorially been seedless, that the old nonpareil apple was known in the time of Queen Elizabeth, that the white beurré pears of France have been propagated from the earliest times, and that golden pippins, St.-Michael pears, and others said to have run out were still to be had in good condition. Coming down to the present year, a glance through the pro- ceedings of pomological societies, and the debates of farmers’ clubs, brings out the same difference of opinion. The testimony is nearly equally divided. Perhaps the larger number speak of the deterioration and failure of particular old sorts; but when the question turns on “ wearing out,” the positive evidence of vigorous trees and sound fruits is most telling. A little positive testimony outweighs a good deal of negative. This cannot readily be explained away, while the failures may be, by ex- haustion of soil, incoming of disease, or alteration of climate or circumstances. On the other hand, it may be urged that, if a variety of this sort is fated to become decrepit and die out, it is not bound to die out all at once and everywhere at the same time. It would be expected first to give way wherever it is weakest, from whatever cause. This consideration has an important bearing upon the final question, Are old varieties of this kind on the way to die out on account of their age or any inherent limit of vitality ? Here, again, Mr. Knight took an extreme view. In his essay in the ‘ Philosophical Transactions,’ published in the year 1810, he propounded the theory, not merely of a natural limit to varieties from grafts and cuttings, but even that they would not survive the natural term of the life of the seedling trees from which they were originally taken. Whatever may have been his view of the natural term of the life of a tree, and of a cutting being merely a part of the individual that produced it, there is no doubt that he laid himself open to the effective replies which were made from all sides at the time, 196 Prof. Asa Gray on the Question and have lost none of their force since. Weeping willows, bread-fruits, bananas, sugar-cane, tiger lilies, Jerusalem arti- chokes, and the like have been propagated for a long while in this way without evident decadence. Moreover the analogy upon which his hypothesis is founded will not hold. Whether or not one adopts the present writer’s one OE that individuality is not actually reached or main- tained in the vegetable world, it is clear enough that a common plant or tree is not an individual in the sense that a horse or man, or any one of the higher animals, is—that it is an indi- vidual only in the sense that a branching zoophyte or mass of coral is. Soluttur crescendo: the tree and the branch equally demonstrate that they are not individuals, by being divided with impunity and advantage, with no loss of life, but much increase. It looks odd enough to see a writer like Mr. Sisle reproducing the old hypothesis in so bare a form as this —* am prepared to maintain that varieties are individuals, and that as they are born they must die, like other individuals.” “We know that oaks, sequoias, and other trees live several centuries; but how many, we do not exactly know. But that they must die, no one in his senses will dispute.”” Now what people in their senses do dispute is, not that the tree will die, but that other trees, established from cuttings of it, will die with it. But does it follow from this that non-sexually propagated varieties are endowed with the same power of unlimited dura- tion that are possessed by varieties and species propagated sexually (7. e. by seed)? Those who think so jump too soon at their conclusion. For, as to the facts, it is not enough to point out the diseases or the trouble in the soil or the atmo- sphere to which certain old fruits are succumbing, nor to prove that a parasitic fungus (Peronospora infestans) 1s what 1s the matter with potatoes. For how else would constitutional debility, if such there be, more naturally manifest itself than in such increased liability or diminished resistance to such attacks ? And if you say that anyhow such varieties no not die of oldage (meaning that each individual attacked does not die of old age, but of manifest disease), it may be asked in return, What individual man ever dies of old age in any other sense than of a similar inability to resist invasions which in earlier years would have produced no noticeable effect? Aged people die of a slight cold or a slight accident ; but the inevit- able weakness that attends old age is what makes these slight attacks fatal. Finally, there is a philosophical argument which tells strongly for some limitations of the duration of non-sexually- of the Permanence of Varieties. 197 pee forms, one that probably Knight never thought of, ut which we should not have expected recent writers to overlook. When Mr. Darwin announced the principle that cross-fertilization between the individuals of a species is the plan of nature, and is practically so universal that it fairly sustains his inference that no hermaphrodite species continu- ally self-fertilized would continue to exist, he made it clear to all who apprehend and receive the principle, that a series of plants propagated by buds only must have weaker hold of life than a series reproduced by seed. For the former is the closest possible kind of close breeding. Upon this ground such varieties may be expected ultimately to die out; but “ the mills of the gods grind so exceedingly slow,” that we cannot say that any particular grist has been actually ground out under human observation. If it be asked how the asserted principle is proved or made probable, we can here merely say that the proof is wholly infe- rential. But the inference is drawn from such a vast array of facts that itis well nigh irresistible. It is the legitimate expla- nation of those arrangements in nature to secure cross-fertiliza- tion in the species, either constantly or occasionally, which are so general, so varied and diverse, and, we may add, so exquisite and wonderful, that, once propounded, we see that it must be true. What else, indeed, is the meaning and use of sexual reproduction? Not simply increase in numbers; for that is otherwise effectually provided for by budding propagation in lants and many of the lower animals. There are plants, indeed, of the lower sort, in which the whole multiplication takes place in this way, and with great rapidity. These also have sexual reproduction ; but in it two old individuals are always destroyed to make a single new one! Here propagation diminishes the number of individuals 50 per cent. Who can suppose that such a costly process as this, and that all the exquisite arrangements for cross-fertilization in hermaphrodite plants, do not subserve some most important purpose? How and why the union of two organisms, or generally of two very minute portions of them, should reenforce vitality, we do not know and can hardly conjecture. But this must be the mean- ing of sexual reproduction. The conclusion of the matter from the scientific point of view is, that sexually propagated varieties, or races, although liable to disappear through change, need not be expected to wear out, and there is no proof that they do—but that non-sexually propagated varieties, though not liable to change, may theo- retically be expected to wear out, but to be a very long time about it. Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Ser. 4. Vol. xv. 14 198 Prof. W. King on Oceanic Sediments, and XXVI.— Oceanic Sediments, and their Relation to Geological Formations. By Professor WiLLiAM KIn@, Sc.D. &e. THE valuable “preliminary reports” by Professor Wyville Thomson, M.D. &c., in parts 154 & 156 of the ‘ Proceedings ’ of the Royal Society, demand the special attention of geolo- gists, as making known some important facts elucidating the sedimentary or depositional phenomena of the ocean in past periods of our F tle When my Notices * were published on the various objects obtained by the soundings of H.M.S. ‘ Porcupine,’ during her Atlantic-Telegraph Survey Expedition off the west coast of Ireland, in 1862, the belief was gaining ground that the cal- careous ooze occurring at great depths in the ocean is formed of the testaceous débris of Foraminifera that habitually live on its bottom. Ehrenberg, tinding sarcode in the foraminifer- shells brought up from the bed of the subarctic Atlantic by Colonel Schaffner, appears to have been the first to give a decided expression to this view; though it had previously found favour with Professor Bailey, and was forcibly advo- cated afterwards by Wallich. The discoveries of Huxley, Berryman, and others strongly tended in the same direc- tion. Influenced by these authorities, and taking various matters into consideration, I was induced to express the belief that the floor of the deep Atlantic is crowded with living Globigerine and Orbuline. Subsequently, in 1869, Doctors W. B. Carpenter and Wyville Thomson formed and expressed a very oe opinion on the same side. However, the re- searches lately made by the latter have led him to renounce this opinion, and to contend, like Major Owen and Dr. Gwyn Jeffreys, that the ooze-forming organisms inhabit the superficial stratum of the ocean, from the surface to about 100 fathoms in depth. I should have readily subscribed to the same view, but for certain facts which appear to oppose it. There are no unequivocal instances of living examples of the organisms referred to having been found in mid- ocean at the surface t. Major Owen’s accounts (also appa- rently Lieut. Palmer’s, which I have not been able to con- sult) have been accepted as proving that Globigerina and Orbulina are inhabitants of the superficial stratum, rising and * See ‘ Nautical Magazine,’ December 1862 ; and ‘ Fraser’s Magazine,’ October 1863. + The cases cited of Miiller and Hiickel having taken live specimens of Globigerina and Orbulina in the tow-net must be eliminated, as they belong to shallow depths not far from land, where the creatures may not only live at the bottom, but may occasionally rise to the surface, or be brought i through adhering to pieces of seaweed that have got detached from the bottom. their Relation to Geological Formations. 199 sinking in it at will; but there is nothing recorded to support the idea that they are alive, except their occurring in the greatest numbers on the surface after sunset; from which it is inferred that they avoid the light. The presumed fact is certainly sin- gular if the creatures are dead, though it may not be beyond a physical explanation. But if they are living, it is equally singular that no manifestations of vital functions have been observed, as far as I can ascertain, in any captured specimens, by those who have had the opportunity of examining them, Prof. Wyville Thomson and assistant Mr. Murray (who has been paying the closest attention to the floating Foraminifera) would scarcely be unmindful of this matter; yet it is note- worthy that they “never have been able to detect in any of the large number of Globigerine which have been examined ”’ by them “the least trace of pseudopodia, or any extension in any form of the sarcode beyond the shell.” Moreover the chambers are often almost empty, even in the freshest- looking specimens; or they contain sarcode apparently in no other than the unsatisfactory condition it presented to Bailey, Ehrenberg, Wallich, and others. So far, then, I see no reason to change the opinion which is expressed in my Notices of 1862. In order to explain all the circumstances under which the ooze-forming foraminifers occur, I am induced to make the following suggestions in accordance with the assumption that they live atthe bottom. As soon asa Globigerine or an Orbu- line dies, the decomposition of the sarcode generates within the chambers sufficient carbonic-acid gas to cause ft to rise to the surface. Here, the sarcode being still in process of decomposi- tion, gas continues to be discharged from the chambers alter- nately with the intromission of water: these actions give rise to variations in the specific gravity and, asea consequence, to opposite vertical movements of the shell. It is conceivable, all other conditions being favourable, that occasionally, after the superficial stratum of the ocean has got warmed by the noon-day sun, the elevated temperature, and the consequent acceleration of the decomposition of the sarcode, would largely increase the generation of gas, thereby causing the shell to rise to or near the surface towards or after snnset: during the night, on the gas escaping and its replacement by water, the shell would descend again *. Thus, as long as decomposition * It is stated by Lewy that the amount of oxygen in sea-water is somewhat greater during the day than it is at night, the reverse being the case as regards carbonic acid (Bischof, vol. i. p. 115). May not this difference haye something to do with the rising of the shells during the night ? 14* 200 Prof. W. King on Oceanic Sediments, and of the sarcode was carried on within its chambers, a forami- nifer-shell would be limited to the superficial stratum, rising and sinking therein, as if it were animated and it preferred darkness to light. Eventually, gas ceasing to be generated, and the chambers becoming filled with water, the shell sinks to the bottom. These suggestions, it appears to me, are fully capable of explaining not only the presence of foraminifer-shells in the greatest abundance in the superficial stratum after sunset (assuming that the observations made by Major Owen and others are conclusive on this point *), but how it is that the specimens taken in the tow-net are often fresh, transparent, and occasionally furnished with spines in a wonderful state of preservation t; while those obtained from the bottom are usually in an opaque or chalky condition. On the view that these organisms habitually live at the bottom, it may be urged that some specimens in the living state ought to be brought up by the datas or sounding-apparatus. Consider- able doubt, however, may be entertained as to such possessing any vital power, considering the greatly altered conditions of temperature and pressure they would be subject to during the ascent ; and it is highly improbable that many of them would retain their delicate spies. As the problem does not seem to be difficult of solution, let us hope that it will not remain long in its present unsettled state. As regards the nature of the various substances forming the sea-bottoms, the general concurrence of the recorded ob- servations goes far to prove that generally wherever the depth increases beyond 2600 fathoms the foraminifer-ooze gives place to argillaceous deposits, one kind marked “ grey ooze ” and the other “ red clay”’ in the ‘ Challenger’s’ charts,—that, instead of a substance convertible into limestone or chalk, there occurs at depths approaching and exceeding 3000 fathoms a sediment essentially consisting of silica, red oxide of iron, and alumina. The two formations pass into each other by * The naturalists of the ‘Challenger’ are silent on this point: on the contrary, they mention that Pulvinulina Menardi, which largely contri- butes to the formation of the ooze, is very abundant at the surface, and still more so during the day at a depth of from 10 to 20 fathoms. + Hackel has thrown out the suggestion that the spines with which Orbulina and Globigerina are crowded “ probably contribute essentially to enable these little animals to float below the surface of the water by greatly increasing their surface, and consequently their friction against the water, and rendering it more difficult for them to sink.” But the force of this suggestion is altogether weakened by the fact that Pulvinu- line, equally considered to be surface-swimmers, do not possess any spines, their Relation to Geological Formations. 201 gradations apparently consequent on occupying intermediate depths, and often represented by the grey ooze. It would also appear that at the greatest ascertained depths conditions prevail unfavourable to the existence of organisms with calci- ferous tissues or calcareous skeletons. Life, however, still exists in the abyssal basins where the grey and red clays are formed. In several hauls, in one instance from 2975 fathoms, there were brought up :—holothurids of considerable size with rudimentary calcareous neck-rings ; delicate branching, almost membranous Bryozoa; tube-building annelids, and tests of Foraminifera, the two latter being made up of particles of the red clay alone. Andon one occasion, between Kerguelen Island and Melbourne, the “ red clay,” at the depth of 2600 fathoms, yielded Holothurias, starfishes, Actinias, Palliobranchs, Euplec- tella-sponges, &c.: those with calcareous parts were rather stunted. Considering the existence in the ocean of vast numbers 0 diatoms, polycystines (these, there is no doubt, habitually live at or near the surface), sponges, and other organisms, whose skeletons consist of silica—also that rock-particles in the finest state of division, from their occurrence everywhere in the atmosphere, must be scattered over the sea-bottom by the distributive action of currents, it was to be expected that the foraminifer-ooze would not be purely calcareous. The analyses published by Messrs. David Forbes and John Hunter (late of the Queen’s College, Belfast) show that such is actually the fact—the former having found, in a specimen from the depth of 2435 fathoms, 23°34 silica, 5-91 ferric oxide, 5°35 alumina*; the latter, in a specimen taken in 1443 fathoms, 26°77 fine insoluble gritty sand (rock-débris), 1°33 alumina (soluble in acids), and 2°17 sesquioxide of iron (soluble in acids) +. Mr. Buchanan, of the ‘Challenger, has found 1 per cent. of a reddish mud, consisting of silica, alumina, and red oxide of iron, after washing and subjecting samples of the ooze to the action of weak acid. These results seem to have satis- fied the scientific Director of the Survey that, allowing certain difficulties as mere matters of detail, the question as to the origin of the red clay is in the main solved. Grant sufficient free carbonic acid in the water of deep ocean-basins to dissolve all calcareous bodies, such as foraminifer-shells, that fall into them, the insoluble constituent alone will remain as a deposit. Professor W. C. Williamson proposed a similar hypothesis many years ago to account for the absence of calcareous shells in the siliceous (Diatomaceous) deposits of Bermuda and Vir- * Proc. Royal Soe. vol. xviii. p. 490. + Ib. p. 428. 202 Prof. W. King on Oceanic Sediments, and ginia, assuming that at one time they were like the Levant mud, in which there is generally an admixture of calcareous and siliceous organisms *. There are certain facts in geology which show analogous changes effected by the agency of carbonic acid: the most striking that occurs to me 1s the conversion, by means of this solvent, of beds of argillaceous limestone (Carboniferous) into highly aluminous rotten-stone, in Derbyshire and Glamorgan- shire. Nevertheless there are some grounds for refusing to look upon the “ red-clay” basins as so many Upas valleys. If carbonic acid destroyed all the shell-structures carried into them, the water would necessarily become charged with bi- carbonate of lime in solution; but from the various analyses hitherto made of sea-water, the quantity it contains of this salt appears to be very small compared with the amount of sulphate of lime. Carbonic acid may be the agent ; but I am more in favour of sulphuric or rather sulphurous acid, con- sidering that such is not unlikely to be produced by the oxida- tion of sulphuretted hydrogen, derived from the decomposi- tion of organic matter—also the presence of its decomposing agent (oxygen), as determined by Messrs. Lant Carpenter and Buchanan, in the depths of the ocean f. Subjected to the action of sulphurous acid, the substance of all calcareous shells in a dead condition would be ultimately converted into soluble sulphate of lime, with liberation of car- bonic acidt; and thus the ocean would be perpetually supplied * Transactions of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society, 1847. It must not be overlooked that the siliceous organisms which occur in the foraminifer-ooze in appreciable proportion have likewise for the most part disappeared in the red clay, through the action of some dissolving agent. Crystals of quartz, from Zinnwald, are not uncommon with their planes corroded and deeply excavated in places originally oceu- os by oligist—showing that the silica has been in some way removed y the action of a ferric oxide; the fact is of some significance in con- nexion with the pete tt ae of the siliceous organisms from the red clay. I may add that Mr. H. J. Carter has called attention to the rapid wasting or decay which siliceous (also calcareous) spicules of sponges undergo in his cabinet, whether mounted or unmounted, also in living specimens (see Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. 1873, vol. xii. pp. 456,457). This destruction appears to be due to solvent action of another kind. + Ihave a some experience of the presence of sulphuretted hydrogen in the ocean during a strong gale of three days’ duration on the west side of the Doggerbank, while on one of my dredging-expeditions, some thirty years ago. The agitation of the sediment at the depth of about forty fathoms by the heavy seas caused so much of this gas to rise to the surface that my watch, a silver one, became quite blackened by its action. { When Bischof wrote his ‘Chemical and Physical Geology’ very little was known respecting the abundance of calcareous organisms at the bottom of deep oceans. Fixing his attention on the vast amount of PY a = their Relation to Geological Formations. 203 with its most abundant calcic constituent. The same process, it may be urged, would take place over the shallower areas covered with foraminifer-ooze. Admitted, but with this difference: in the “red-clay”’ basins foraminifer life evidently approaches zero, whereas in shallower areas it is unquestionably in the ascendant ; therefore any loss of lime the latter areas may sustain through the action of sulphurous acid, would be made up by “ving Foraminifera converting the sulphate of lime in the surrounding water into the carbonate composing their shells. Doubtless, whatever the agent may be that produces the “red-clay”’ deposit, it has contributed more or less to the pro- duction of similar or related formations belonging to different geological periods—though they may be of any colour, depend- ing on the relative amount of their constituents and the nature of their combination. Certain supersilicated rocks (as nova- culite, fuller’s earth, chamoisite, &c.) suggest themselves in con- nexion with this idea; and it is highly probable that many of the glauconites were originally red clays (the residue of forami- nifer-ooze), part of the peroxide of iron of the latter having been reduced to a protoxide by organic matter. I cannot, however, think it is correct to associate the Oldhamian schists (Cambrian) with this idea—that is, ‘‘to suspect that they may be organic formations like the modern red clay of the Atlantic and Southern sea, accumulations of the in- soluble ashes of shelled creatures.” The thousands of feet of Cambrian schists would require the existence somewhere of vastly more thousands of feet of synchronous limestones. But where are they? In the recently published paper by Mr. T’. Davidson and myself on the 7rimerellide this ques- tion was briefly discussed *. Failing to ascertain the existence of any limestones of the kind, we made the suggestion that the Cambrian seas were not inhabited by organisms furnished with calcareous skeletons, or they did not contain the ordi- nary amount of calcic constituents. I do not dispute that bicarbonate of lime carried into the sea by rivers, he naturally concluded that this salt was appropriated by shell-fish. Nevertheless I must still adhere to the opinion I expressed in 1862, that pelagic animals obtain calcic matter from the sulphate of lime contained in the surrounding water. I find that Forechhammer is of opinion ‘ that Testacea decompose the latter substance by means of carbonate of ammonia formed by their agency.” Bischof thinks that “it might likewise be decomposed by the organic matter of marine animals into sulphide of calcium, which would be decomposed by the carbonic acid produced by them” (see ‘Chemical Geology,’ vol. i. p. 180, footnote). ) * Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, May 1874. 204 Dr. G. Krefft on Professor Owen's calcareous rocks belonging to the Cambrian system may yet be found; but considerable doubts may be entertained of their occurring in it to any extent except as methylosed members. The facts brought to light by the various submarine surveys that have been made show how simple, yet grand, are the depositional phenomena of the ocean ;_ but they place before the geologist nothing more than the materials that enter into the composition of ordinary sedimentary rocks in their normal condition. During the Wernerian stage in the progress of geology the doctrine was taught that crystalline rocks were the products of oceanic precipitations. Other doctrines took its place. Of late years, however, it has been revived, with novel accessories. Judging from the results of the surveys referred to, the chances seem to be extremely remote that any sea-bottoms will ever yield to the dredge samples of direct crystalline precipitates having the least relation to the Lauren- tian diorites, ophites, syenites and the like, as products of our present oceans. XXVII.—Remarks on Professor Owen's Arrangement of the Fossil Kangaroos*. By GERARD KREFFTT. THE first part of Professor Owen’s work describing the fossil kangaroos has just been received; and as some new genera have been added, it will no doubt interest readers of the ‘ Sydney Mail’ to hear how these divisions have been defined. The learned Professor pays a just tribute to John Gould, F.R.S., “through whose adventurous journeys, and by the noble works in which he has given the result of his observa- tions in Australia and Tasmania, we mainly know the extent and kinds of variations under which the kangaroo there exists.” There is more in this sentence than many people imagine, because Professor Owen no longer hesitates to speak ‘‘ evolu- tionally ’’ t{ about the subject. It has been pointed out by me on several occasions, and chiefly in papers read before the Royal Society of New South Wales, that the whole of our extinct and living marsupials were offshoots or branches of a kind of animal which combined the dental structure of both the carnivores and herbivores of the marsupial section. The * “On the Fossil Mammals of Australia.—Part VIII. Family Macro- podide: Genera Macropus, Phascolagus, Sthenurus, and Protemnodon Phil. Trans. 1874, pt. i. pp. 245-287, pls. xx.-xxvii.), by Professor wen, F.R.S. + From the ‘Sydney Mail,’ Dec. 26, 1874. Communicated by the author. t Royal Society’s ‘ Philosophical Transactions’ for 1874, p, 255, Arrangement of the Fossil Kangaroos. 205 Thylacoleo was the last representative of this early progenitor of our marsupials; and in this form only occur carnivorous grinders with an otherwise herbivorous dentition. There must have been numerous intermediate forms totally lost, or not yet discovered, which would clear up our doubts upon the subject ; so much is certain, however, that with the Zhylacoleo disappeared the nearest relation of the most ancient form of marsupial life in this country. Supposing, then, this hypothesis to be correct, we can well account for the development of the rest of the pouched tribe, and simply divide them into two groups,—No. 1 embracing all the members with a pair of small conjointed inner toes— that is, kangaroos, rat-kangaroos, wombats, phalangers (opos- sums, flying squirrels, native bears, &c.), and bandicoots ; whilst No. 2, on the other hand, comprises the true flesh-eaters, without the conjoined inner pair of toes, such as the Tasmanian tiger and devil, the dasyures or native cats, and the small fry of pouched mice. ll our marsupials can be received into one or the other of these groups; so that, after all, the classification of them is easy enough. It may be argued that the dentition varies much ; but when we study embryonic life and the development of the teeth, we soon find the missing links; and if a person will only take the trouble to look for himself before implicitly believing what is published, he will soon change his opinion. Let us take a wombat, an opossum, and a bandicoot for a com- parison : and certainly there are not three animals in the group more different from each other than these ; but all three possess the conjoined toes to the hind feet. When the teeth of a very young wombat are examined, it becomes also clear that they are furnished with crowns or working-surfaces which very much resemble those of our common phalanger or opossum ; and when we take the trouble to disengage the grinders of certain bandicoots, such as the Peragalea or rabbit-rat, we behold a ‘small edition” of a true wombat’s grinders. Of course it is necessary to find out such things by actual ex- amination ; and it must be admitted that few persons have the opportunity, or, if so, make use of it. . he native bear is the diminutive representative of the gigantic extinct Phalangers, the Diprotodons, and Nototheres ; and he is also the most ancient living form of marsupial life, peavey connected by innumerable unknown species with the ower section to which the platypus belongs. At any rate, there is no other animal known to me which, at an early period of its existence, has grinders resembling the horny ‘apologies for teeth”? wherewith our “ duckbill” is supplied 206 Dr. G. Krefft on Professor Owen's when adult. Of course the resemblance is remote, very much so; but there is a resemblance nevertheless. Again, we have rat-kangaroos, which (when despatched in skins without skulls) have been taken more than once for bandicoots by the best European authorities; and there were kangaroos once upon a time which had firmly joined lower jaws, and others with compressed grinders, not unlike the carnivorous marsupials. These two latter groups are not referred to by Professor Owen in part viii., and they will probably be discussed at some future time. The Professor’s treatise is illustrated by eight splendidly executed plates of the newly created genera, some of which represent unique specimens from the Australian-Museum col- lection ; and so faithfully executed are they, that I recognized the figures at a glance, though I have not had an opportunity to look at the originals for six months and more. Professor Owen has found it necessary to alter the existing arrange- ment of the kangaroo tribe, retaining the term JMJacropus tor all the kangaroos proper, for the wallaroos (Osphranter), and for the wallabies (Halmaturus) and rock-wallabies (Petrogale). It appears, however, that, if we must subdivide the fossil species into several genera, we cannot well discard the arrange- . ment formerly proposed and generally adopted*, which is simple, comprehensive, and meets all our wants. This arrangement is as follows :— Genus MAcRopPUuS. Large kangaroos with small premolar teeth, which are soon lost. Genus HALMATURUS. Kangaroos of smaller size, with permanent premolar teeth. This second group is capable of subdivision into four genera or subgenera, and the last, the rat-kangaroos, into two more. Of course it rests with naturalists which system to adopt; but as few museums have so extensive a series of kangaroo skulls and skeletons as our own, we must have some voice in the matter, and cannot be expected to change our arrangement except upon more solid grounds than those given in Professor Owen’s comprehensive paper. Looking at the splendid drawings, we miss one of the chief characteristics of a kangaroo’s skull; and that is the upper in- cisive dentitions of the fossil species Tt. Without this, a proper * ‘Australian Vertebrata, Fossil and Recent,’ by Gerard Krefft, p. 10. + I have seen some proof-plates of skulls of Prof. Owen’s second part of the Macropodide without the important icisive dentition; but Pao not “rg ein the shape of the teeth, as indicated by faint lines, is cor- rect.—G. K, Arrangement of the Fossil Kangaroos. 207 classification cannot be attempted; and it is much to be re- gretted that the author had so little material at his command at the time. Since the work was published, Professor Owen has received numerous additional proofs, through his chief contributor and friend, Dr. George Bennett, and amongst these at least a dozen fragments of skulls, with the incisors perfect or nearly so. The grinding-series differs much in some groups ; and seldom can a pair of skulls be found which have the teeth alike. The grinders are always subject to more than the usual variation ; and for this purpose large quantities of skulls were brought together and examined here before classification was attempted. The result led to the conclusion that by the upper front teeth only (of half-grown or almost adult individuals) ean skulls be named with certainty. There are two kinds of third upper incisors which occur with premolars of a certain form ; and this sanctions the division into two large groups as above, with the following additional characteristics. 1. Macropus. With a broad third upper cutting-tooth (without a fold or groove when adult), with deciduous premolars, and subject to shedding the grinders up to a single pair in each ramus in old age. 2. HAaLMarTurus. With rather narrow and grooved third upper incisors and a more permanent dentition, the grinders being worn down but seldom shed. Besides this distinguishing point, the distance between the lower incisor and the premolar must be considered ; and the wider this space, the sooner the teeth are reduced in number; the shorter, the longer are the grinders retained. Compare this space in a wallaby’s jaw with that of a kan- garoo, and the difference will be understood at once. A long- headed kangaroo sheds the grinders, whilst a short-headed wallaby wears them out. To illustrate this it is necessary to refer to the author’s splendid illustrations. On plate xx. we have a long-headed kangaroo (under fig. 1), certainly with a short upper third in- cisor, but with every indication that the grinders will be shed with age and not worn down. Figures 13 and 15 represent similar animals, who shed their teeth; but No. 11 (a rock- wallaby’s lower jaw) belongs to the “ grinding-down”’ section, and in this the space between incisors and molars is very short. On plate xxiv. (figures 10, 11, and 12) the lower den- tition of our black wallaby is given. The wear of the incisor below, and the corresponding teeth above, shows that the © animal was fully adult, but had not shed the premolar, as true 208 Dr. G. Krefft on Fossil Kangaroos, kangaroos invariably do about that period. Figure 1, repre- senting the skull with a front tooth lost, proves, first, that the author had not the material required ; otherwise a more perfect figure would have been given; it also shows that the value of the upper incisors as a means of classification is reduced with age, because the incisors, being much worn, lose their original shape completely. On plate xxv. fine illustrations are given of Protemnodon Anak—that is, of a gigantic wallaby who kept his teeth and ground them down, but did not shed them as kangaroos do ; this is, of course, a member of the genus Halmaturus, as we have hitherto classed the tribe. Suppose we designate this creature as Halmaturus (Protemnodon) Anak. It appears, from remarks on page 261, that the author desires to retain the genus Osphranter ; but a definition of the characteristics of the genus are not given. Mr. Gould founded it on external characters only ; and not having a skull at my command, par- ticulars cannot be furnished. There is no doubt that walla- roos identical with the present wallaroo which inhabits the Clarence district, once existed and left their remains in the Wellington caves; Professor Owen mentions their presence * on the Darling Downs also. The genus Phascolagus is mentioned as being found in a fossil state by Dr. Bennett in Queensland. This form occurs living far north, where Mr. George F. Waterhouse, of the Adelaide Museum, obtained the typical specimen. It appears to be a link between the wallabies and kangaroos proper, the head being long ; but the third upper incisor is a narrow tooth, and therefore the animal does not correspond with the kan- garoos proper, which have broad third upper incisors. The genus Sortogale is referred to in several places on pages 263 and 264, founded on anatomical points of the skull, which cannot be distinguished without specimens. As far as I can remember, the teeth resemble those of the wallaroo. The large fossil wallaby, hitherto known to us as Macropus (or Halma- turus) Atlas, is now classed under the designation of Sthenurus Atlas. ‘This is also a true wallaby, the form of whose lower premolar teeth approaches those of certain extinct phalangers of the genus Nototherium. Several new species of each genus are described in the treatise, which can be referred to at the Public Library. The next part of the learned author’s work will probably bring the kangaroo tribe to a close; and we may confidently expect to see figured therein some of the well-preserved spe- cimens forwarded by Dr. Bennett during the last six months. Surveying the part as a whole, it must be considered a - OO M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. 209 splendid addition to the elucidation of Australian natural his- tory; and it is to be hoped that another grant will be made by our liberal Legislature to enable the author to finish his great undertaking. XXVIII.—Zo0logico-Embryological Investigations. By M. Ussow. [Continued from p. 113. } IV. Appearance of the Organs. We may now pass to the second period *, that of the pro- duction of the organs. On the first day of this period (in Sepiola and Loligo the ninth day from the beginning of the process of segmentation) the rhomboidal groove already de- scribed gradually becomes deeper, and covered over by the elongate-ovate constantly growing fold, which is separating by constriction at the ventral side and assuming the form of a shield. ‘Towards the end of this period the margins of the fold begin to grow together, and the rhomboidal groove becomes converted into a flat tube, somewhat broader in the middle (especially in Sepia). The scutiform hill-like elevation (originating from the co- alesced fold) which lies over the tube chiefly on the dorsal surface, and which is gradually constricted, is the rudiment of the mantle; whilst the os Sepie will subsequently be formed in the above-mentioned tube closed at both ends and widest in the middle (Sepia, Loligo, Sepiola, Ommastrephes, Rossia). The elevation, separating by constriction at the ventral side, grows both upwards and downwards, and ac- quires first the form of a cup and then that of a cylinder. The walls of the so-called primitive groove Tt, which is con- * In Loligo, Sepiola, and Argonauta the second period of development lasts five days. In this paper I follow Metschnikoff’s division of the development of the Cephalopoda into three consecutive periods :—first, the formation of the germ-lamell; second, the appearance of the organs ; third, the gradual further development of the organs. + The position of this rhomboidal depression upon the dorsal surface, its early appearance (before all the organs), its further mode of develop- ment, are all facts which remind us of the primitive groove of the Verte- brata: and taking them into consideration, it may likewise be called the primitive groove, although as a matter of course there can be no question of comparing it more closely with the primitive groove of the Vertebrata, as the two rudiments represent fundamentally different organs. Although a groove is also at first formed in the Octopoda (Argonauta), this does not become closed (except in the genus Cirrhoteuthis?), but becomes gra- dually effaced and finally disappears entirely. With regard to Argo- nauta, | must remark that Kolliker has described and figured the groove (4 ¢. p. 163, Taf. vi. figs. 71-73) as “a rather deep, funnel-shaped pit.” 210 M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. verted into a tube in the manner above mentioned, consist of a single layer of cells * of the upper germ-lamella ; whilst in the oval fold (rudiment of the mantle), besides the elongated cylindrical cells situated at its surface, there are also two layers of cells of the middle germ-lamella. The first of these layers (dermo-muscular layer), constantly increasing with the deve- lopment of the fold, becomes more than one-layered under its margins t, and therefore also thicker; and this thickening is the immediate cause of the eversion of the fold over the blasto- derm and its constriction on the ventral side. Besides the above-mentioned organs, the rudiments of eye- ovals and of the buccal orifice make their appearance at this time. The buccal orifice, which can only be recognized with some trouble from without, appears in longitudinal sections of this stage as a very shallow depression of the upper germ- lamella. The rudiments of the eyes, which lie symmetrically on the sides of the dorsal surface, are developed chiefly from the elongated cells of the upper germ-lamella, the single series of which forms a longish oval convexity ¢ above the blastoderm. The Cephalopod embryo, freed from the nutritive vitellus in the manner already described (see p. 100, note t), in this first stage of the production of the organs has the form of a convex disk, or rather of a hollow hemisphere, composed of more than one layer and more or less thickened in many places. The earliest and most considerable thickening corre- sponds to the scutiform mantle-rudiment, pointed on the dorsal ‘surface, and curvilinearly bounded on the ventral side by the above-described rhomboidal groove, which in transverse * The cylindrical cells lining the bottom of the groove are rather tall, whilst the layer which covers the groove and subsequently grows together consists of small flat cells. Some agreement in the production of this groove and that of the intestino-glandular [epithelia | layer of certain animals (e. gy. the Arthropoda), and the great resemblance of its cells underlying the upper germ-lamella to those of that layer, at first led me astray, and made me think that perhaps in the Cephalopoda also a portion of the intestinal tract is formed as in the Crustacea (see the remarkable Russian memoir of Bobrezky, “On the development of Astacus and Palemon”’). It was only a long series of repeated observations that convinced me of my original error. + The part of the dermo-muscular layer which is situated between the groove and the surface of the mantle becomes converted (in the third period) into the cutis with its muscular and fibrous layer. t This mode of development of the primitive eye-ovals, which are soon covered by a second fold of the upper lamella and then graduall begin to sink, has been quite correctly observed by Metschnikoff in Sepiola (J. c. pp. 48-49). As regards the other Cephalopoda, it is confirmed b my investigations ; and consequently Kolliker’s (/. ¢. p. 99) and Hensen’s (Zeitschr. fiir wiss. Zool. Bd. xy. p. 183) statements prove to be erroneous. M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. 211 sections appears as a shallow but wide depression of the upper germ-lamella, At the time of its appearance the rudiment of the mantle is situated in the middle of the original germinal disk (centrum), with by far the greater part of it on the dorsal surface, whilst the somewhat elevated (constricting) part which subsequently grows round the ventral surface occupies only a very inconsiderable space upon the latter. Above the mantle there are symmetrically on the two sides of the dorsal surface the two eye-ovals, and between them, at the boundary of the region of the arms, the above-mentioned rudiment of the buccal orifice. The lateral surfaces of .the embryo represent the future cephalic lobes. On the following day, in all the Cephalopoda investigated by me, the branchie, the funnel, the arms, and the anal tubercle made their appearance. At the time when the rudiment of the mantle has become rather more constricted off from the blastoderm on the ventral surface, the cell-layer of the upper germ-lamella becomes somewhat thicker at the sides of the embryo (at first by longitudinal division, by which the cells are rendered higher, and then also by transverse division), and forms two inconsiderable prominences, which gradually grow and are the rudiments of the two so-called cephalic lobes. As regards the rudiments of the branchiz, which are at first situated on the ventral side of the embryo not far from the margin of the mantle, these are developed from the more than one-layered thickening * of the dermo-muscular layer of the middle germ-lamella, which is covered by the cells of the ad lamella. nthe boundary between the anterior cephalic lobe and the rudiment of the mantle a semilunar fold makes its appear- ance on each side of the embryo, produced by a thickening of the dermo-muscular layer, and covered, like all the organs mentioned, by cells of the upper lamella. This is the rudi- ment of the funnel, which consists of two halves, the margins of which coalesce very late, indeed only at the commencement of the third period f. Almost simultaneously with the appearance of the branchiz there is formed between their pyriform rudiments, in the * At the end of the second and during the third period the cells in the middle of the solid branchial rudiments gradually become loosened, and tortuous. reticulated ducts are produced in which the branchial arteries and veins with their numerous ramifications are formed (see Van Beneden, lc. p. 9; Kélliker, 2. ¢. p. 89; Metschnikoff, 7. ¢. p. 61). + On the dorsal surface the two halves of the funnel approach each other as early as the fourth day of the second period, 212 M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. median line * of the embryo, a rather inconsiderable promi- nence, which, like most of the outgrowths, proceeds from the second germ-lamella (in this case chiefly from the intestino- fibrous layer), and is also covered by the upper lamella, This prominence forms the first commencement of the anus. About the same time, in all the Cephalopoda investigated by me, the four (Argonauta) or five pairs of rudimentary arms make their appearance very rapidly after one another (at the utmost in two days; in some the first three pairs simultaneously ). This seems to confirm Van Panabanict observation, which was rejected by Kélliker § and afterwards by Metschnikoff ||. The rudiments of the arms are developed as hemispherical out- growths, composed chiefly of the dermo-muscular layer and covered by cells of the blastoderm. They all make their appearance on the annular ii of the germinal disk situated on the equator, which is formed by several (three or four) concentric series of large but flat cells, constricted off from the segments after the meridional segmentation, and at first lying scattered in isolated groups 4]. On the third day of the second period the rudiments of the auditory organs, the pharynx, the salivary glands, the anal orifice, and the external fold of the eye-ovals are added to the organs already enumerated and now undergoing further development. Between the outer margin of the rudiment of the funnel (at the part where its cartilages, although indistinctly, are beginning to be formed) and the commencement of the anterior cephalic lobe the upper lamella becomes a little depressed on both sides of the ventral surface of the embryo, and forms two (at first very small) pits, which ar€ sharply marked in both longitudinal and transverse sections, and represent the rudi- ments of the auditory organs, only approaching each other at the close of the third period. Their trumpet-like peduncles, which at the end of the second period are entirely constricted off from the upper lamella, become converted into canals, which finally lie upon the auditory vesicle, which is com- pletely separated from the outer surface. The walls of the latter soon become thicker in many parts **. * In the longitudinal line which passes through the buccal aperture and the middle of the mantle, and divides the embryo into two symmetrical halves. + In Loligo, Sepiola, and Argonauta. { Loe, cit. p. 7, fig. 9. § Loe. cit. p. 60. || Loe. eit. p. 35. {| See description of the process of segmentation. ** At the beginning of the third period, in all the Cophal oda inyesti- gated by me, there are formed in the cavity of each auditory vesicle (0:32 millim. in diameter in Zoligo), on its upper wall, shining granules M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. 21° The pit-like depression of the upper lamella, which forms the buccal orifice, gradually penetrates deeper (between the two layers of fusiform cells of the intestino-fibrous layer, which lies between the nutritive vitellus and the dermo- muscular layer, which bound it) ; and at the bottom of this shallow pouch-like pit there is formed a small prominence composed of cells of the middle lamella (dermo-muscular layer). This prominence, which lies to one side at the hinder wall of the pit, and, like this, is covered by cells of the upper lamella, represents the hinder part of the pharynx, and becomes subsequently (in the third period) converted into the so-called organ of taste, with its muscular tissue and un- cinate radula. Between the hinder wall of the original buccal cavity and the above-mentioned prominence the upper cell- layer of the latter closes into a thin and short cecal tube. This tube lengthens pretty rapidly and then becomes forked, and thus forms the rudiment of the efferent duct of the salivary glands, which are developed (in the third period) at the ends of the two branches of the above-mentioned tube. The original funnel-shaped tube (wider above), however, represents in its upper part the rudiment of the buccal cavity, and in its lower part that of the wsophagus or anterior intestine. The other parts of the pharynx, the /ower and upper jaws, and the thick muscle of the latter are developed in the third period—the jaws as a chitinous secretion of the epithelial envelope of the buccal cavity, and the muscle as a thickening of the dermo- muscular layer which is applied to the anterior wall of the original buccal pit. The change which takes place on this (third) day in the anal prominence consists in the cells of the upper lamella forming in its centre an increasing depression, which is the rudiment of the anal aperture. Over each of the thickened eye-ovals forming the primitive retina appears a fold, consisting of cells of the upper lamella, which grows rapidly, and covers the whole of the oval at the end of this second period, although a small aperture remains in the centre of the fold. At the same time small yellow (0°04 millim. in diameter), which soon unite together, consisting of a calcareous secretion from the cylindrical epithelial cells ; and from these the two otoliths (0:048 millim. in diameter) originate. The canals which lie upon the auditory vesicles become bent (in the third period), and their internal epithelial walls covered with cilia. In general my observations on the development of the auditory organs agree with the results obtained by Metschnikoff in Sepiola (J. c. pp. 49-53), but differ materially from those of Kolliker (/. c, p. 168). ” Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Ser. 4. Vol. xv. 15 ; 214 M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. pigment-granules are produced upon the surface of the retina *, The two cephalic lobes, which have now become consider- ably thicker, rise more and more above the nutritive vitellus ; whilst the region of the arms,situated upon the equator, becomes constricted, and thus forms a narrower boundary between the embryo and the spherical yelk-sac. The embryo, when ex- amined from either the ventral or dorsal side, has a lyriform shape ; its lower part (mantle) is considerably separated by con- striction from the ventral surface, the middle partt tolerably broad ; and the region of the arms forms a very noticeable notch between the yelk-sac and the true embryo. The nutritive vitellus enclosed within the embryo has the form of a hemi- sphere with a tuberculiform process which penetrates into the mantle on the dorsal surface. The fourth day of the second period of development is cha- racterized by the appearance of two spherical masses of cells of the intestino-fibrous layer of the middle lamella, which are situated on the ventral side of the embryo, near the sides of the branchie, at the apices of which two prominences are produced at this time. These solid aggregations of cells form the rudi- ment of the auricles of the heart, which are afterwards sur- rounded by a pericardium. The pericardium consists of a cell- layer of the upper lamella, which penetrates between the mantle and the tunnel, and completely clothes the aggrega- tionsf. The rudiment of the ventricle of the heart lies between the rudiments of the auricles, can only be detected with diffi- culty§, and consists of a solid aggregation of cells belonging to the intestino-fibrous layer, which is at first spherical but afterwards cylindrical. By degrees the cells separate from * With respect to the development of the organs of vision, I must add that the lens is formed at the beginning of the third period as a fluid, gradually hardening secretion of the corpus ciliare produced from the above-mentioned fold. Its form changes pretty rapidly from cylindrical to oval, and finally becomes spherical. In longitudinal and transverse sections of the embryos of Argonauta, Loligo, &c. the lens consists of concentric layers of a structureless transparent substance. In the third period the retina, consisting of two layers of cylindrical cells, which was at first convex, sinks and becomes semilunarly concave; the dark brown pigment, singularly enough, persists upon the surface of the retina until the close of embryonal life. + From this part are gradually formed the head, all the organs enclosed within it, and some organs of the trunk. { The very large pericardial cavity is very distinctly perceptible in the first half of the third period. § It is particularly distinct in sections of the first half of the third pe in the form of an oval aggregation of cells. The cavity, embraced by thin walls, is very slowly formed; so that the development of the auricles considerably precedes that of the ventricle. M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. 215 each other in the centre of each aggregation, so that a gradu- ally enlarging cavity is then produced, whilst the cells become elongated into a spindle-shape, and form rather thick mus- cular walls surrounding the cavity. It is only in the third period, for example in embryos of Sepia which are only one third or one fourth of the size of their yelk-sac, that there are, besides the above-mentioned consi- derably developed and already pulsating central organs of circulation, two so-called branchial hearts, situated at the broad base of the two multitubercular branchie. The walls of the aorta and of all the other subsequently appearing great arteries (e.g. of the optic ganglia), veins, and their diverti- cula (so-called kidneys) are developed from the cells of the middle lamella, which become elongated and arrange them- selves in rows. On the same day, behind each eye-oval, a spherical aggregation of cells of the middle germ-lamella sepa- rates ; and these aggregations represent the rudiments of the optic ganglia. Ishall go into more detail with regard to these in describing the formation of the nervous system. At the end of the fourth day the cephalic lobes approach each other considerably, and the embryo rises above the nutri- tive vitellus, the walls of which, consisting only of a layer of cylindrical cells of the wpper lamella and a layer of the middle lamella united to the former by means of thin, contractile protoplasmic processes, begin to contract rhythmically, by which the absorption of the nutritive vitellus is hastened. At the same time, the cells of the middle lamella (the dermo- muscular layer) surrounding the auditory vesicles, which are connected with the outer world by means of their peduncles, become converted into the envelopes of the latter. On the fifth and last day of the second period the thin ceso- phagus becomes deeper and extends nearly to the mantle, which at this time also rises somewhat on the back. In the anal pit, which has become somewhat deeper and acquired the appearance of a cecal tube, a change takes place which is im- portant, inasmuch as it divides near the entrance into two tubes* :—an upper one, the rudiment of the zxk-sac, which has at first the form of a thin short tube enlarged at its cecal ex- * This division is effected as follows :—Under the bottom of the anal pit, which is coyered by two or three layers of the intestino-fibrous layer, a small excrescence is formed, which gradually raises the bottom of the pit nearly up to the entrance, and in this way, as by a septum, divides the pit into two tubes branching off at an acute angle. The bottom of the u Pe tube soon becomes wider; and at the same time the cells of its walls become considerably longer and thicker. In this way is pro- duced a sac furnished with a short efferent duct. The walls of the pit become higher and form the so-called anal lobes (Sepia, Sepiola). 2 15* 216 M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. tremity ; and a lower one, the perfectly straight rudiment, closed at the extremity, of the true rectum. The walls of these two tubes, as also the cesophagus, consist of a layer of -eylin- drical cells of the sitio tenel upper lamella, surrounded by one or two layers of fusiform cells of the intestino-fibrous layer of the middle lamella. The further development of the intestinal canal which takes place in the third period, consists in the continued growth and increase in depth of its parts above mentioned. The stomach is formed at first as a dilatation of the hinder part of the cesophagus, which, after it has lengthened parallel to the dorsal part of the mantle as far as one half the length of the latter, bends towards the ventral surface almost at a right angle, and unites* with the lengthened primitive rectum, which is turned up towards the back. At the point where the prolongation of the stomach meets the rectum a small dilatation is produced; and from this the cecum is afterwards formed. At the close of the first half of the third period, in transverse and longitudinal sections of the Cephalopoda investigated by me, there are behind the ink- sac (which is already considerably developed), and at first nearer the ventral surface of the embryo, two blind, clavate, thick-walled tubules, which have been developed from a dila- tation of the posterior part of the intestinal canal, and repre- sent the rudiment of the “iver. It is only in the postembryonic period, after the nutritive vitellus is entirely absorbed, that the two halves of the liver enlarge very rapidly, approach each other, and take up their ordinary place in the dorsal part. The proventriculus, or so-called crop, is also developed in the embryo of Argonauta in the first half of the third period, as a dilatation of the cesophagus situated beneath the cerebral ganglion. The walls of all the dilatations above mentioned, which originate at different times, are formed from the vari- ous main and subordinate parts of the intestinal tract, and con- sist of one or two rows of fusiform cells of the intestino-fibrous connexion between the ink-sac and the liver, formerly described by Van Beneden (loc. cit. p. 10), has no existence. * I have not succeeded in observing the moment of direct union; but from the evidence of longitudinal sections of certain stages, and, in fact, of embryos in which the long anterior intestine, enlarged at the extre- mity, extends to two thirds the height of the mantle (first half of the third period), and the rectum curves up towards the dorsal surface, and then of certain sections (from the second half of the third period) in which the slightly tortuous tractus intestinalis is visible in its whole length, I firmly believe that I may assert that this union in reality takes place. M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. 217 layer, and of the cylindrical cells of the inward-bent upper germ-lamella, which therefore seems to play the part of the intestino-glandular layer of the embryos of other animals, representing, I believe, the introverted part of the upper lamella from which the intestinal cavity is formed in Amphi- oxus*, the simple Ascidiat, and some Ccelenteratat, Brachi- opoda§, Vermes||, &c. At no single stage of development of the Cephalopod em- bryo is the nutritive vitellus in any way directly connected with the cavity of the intestinal tract, which is completely separated from it, as, indeed, has already been remarked by Kélhiker] and Metschnikoff**, in opposition to the erroneous statements of older investigatorstt. At the close of the second period the inner nutritive vitellus has the form of a cylinder, from which issue three processes. The inferior, sharp process is, as previously, imbedded in the mantle; whilst the two sickle-shaped lateral processes penetrate into the cephalic lobes behind the eyes, beneath the optic ganglia. The nutritive vitellus passes out of the yelk-sac into the embryo through a cylindrical, gradually narrowing canal formed by the coales- cence of the cephalic lobes ; it is situated between the cesopha- gus, the ganglion pedale, and the ganglion viscerale. During the whole period of development, the whole mass, both of the inner nutritive vitellus and of the outer nutritive vitellus (whichis continually passing into the embryo), is gradually absorbed by the cells of different organs and tissues in contact with it. This short exposition of the results of my tedious investi- gations (upon living embryos and sections of them of different kinds) of the development of the alimentary apparatus of the Cephalopoda contradicts in all points the erroneous opinion of Kolliker tf, that the intestinal tract originates as a solid cord, in which cavities are only produced subsequently, and con- firms the accurate statements of Metschnikoff §§ as to the pro- * Mém. de l’Acad. de St. Pétersb. tome xi. pl. i. fig. 6, and pl. ii. fig. 20. i" Ibid. tome x. pl.i. figs. 10, 16. } Gotting. Nachr. 1868, p. 154 et seqg. Observations on the Develop- ment of the Ceelenterata (in Russian), 1873, pls. ii., iii., iv., vi. § Observations on the Development of the Brachiopoda (in Russian), 1874, pl. i. figs. 3, 10. || Mém. de ’Acad. de St. Pétersb. tome xvi. pls. i., vi. See also the above-cited memoir of Bobrezky’s, pl. i. figs. 1-8. q Loc. cit. p. 86. ** Loc. cit. p. 64, if Van Beneden, loc. cit. p. 8; Delle Chiaje, Mem. 2nd edit. tome i. . 40. , tt Loe. eit. p. 93. §§ Loc. ert. pp. 58, 67. 218 M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. duction of the intestinal tract in Sepiola from two opposite invaginations of the upper germ-lamella. As regards the body-cavity, I think it will be most correct to give this name to the rather narrow and inconsiderable space which oceurs between the peripheral layer of the dermo- muscular layer and one or two rows of the intestino-fibrous layer forming the muscular envelope of the intestinal tract. The whole of this completely closed body-cavity is bounded by elongated cells of the dermo-muscular layer forming the peritoneum or peritoneal sac (in which the alimentary appa- ratus, the central organs of the sanguiferous system, and sub- sequently also the generative organs are placed). ‘The inner nutritive vitellus is never enclosed by a special bounding layer, as Kdlliker* thinks; but it lies free in the body-cavity, and the space occupied by it since the commencement of develop- ment represents the segmentation-cavity of the holoplastic ova with total segmentation of many other animals. The respiratory organs, the two branchiew, and the funnel are situated in a special open respiratory cavity covered only by the ventral part of the mantle, and lined internally with simple epithelium forming the continuation of the upper germ- lamella, penetrating here during its separation from the ventral surface. I have still to notice the period of the appearance of the nervous system and its mode of formation in the Cephalopoda. After a long series of frequently repeated observations relatin to this question, and always furnishing the same results, have been compelled to give up for ever the hope of finding, in the development of the nervous system of the Cephalopoda, any resemblance to its development in the Vertebrata, Tuni- cata, Annulosa, and Mollusca. Whilst even in many species belonging to the types of the poe and Mollusca some ganglia, at least (as has been proved ), are undoubtedly de- veloped from the upper germ-lamella, all the ganglia of the Cephalopoda originate from more or less compact thickenings of the middle germ-lamella (dermo-muscular haven and con- sequently in accordance with the mode of formation of the peri- pheral ganglia in the Vertebrata, which, indeed, has already been partially indicated by Metschnikofft with regard to * Loc. cit. pp. 61, 87, 167. Metschnikoff has justly rejected this view as regards Sepvola. + See the already cited remarkable memoir by Kowalevsky, Mém. de V’Acad. de St. Pétersb. tome xvi. p. 19, pl. v., and p. 24, pl. vii. ; also Bobrezky’s memoir, pl. iii. ; M. Ganin, Warschauer Universitatsberichte, 1873, i.; and Bericht fiir Anat. und Physiol. 1873, p. 360. t Loe. cit. pp, 41, 67. M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. 219 Sepiola. After this preliminary remark I will now describe in a few words the sequence in which the ganglia make their appearance, their original form, and their original position in the Cephalopod embryo. I have already mentioned the time of appearance of the paired optic ganglia. The cells of the middle lamella, which are at first few, but afterwards rapidly increase in number, from which the two oval aggregations (the rudiments of the above-mentioned ganglia) separate, are observable from the earliest appearance of the eye-ovals. At the close of the second period these large rudimentary ganglia placed at the sides of the broad quadrangular head of the embryo have the form of two irregular hemispheres, the convex surface of which closely approaches the retina, which is already becoming concave, whilst the flat sides are turned towards the rudiments of the cerebral and visceral ganglia. The first of these, the cerebral ganglion, which appears on the fifth day of the second period, likewise originates from two compact aggregations of cells of the dermo-muscular layer; and these are united by a broad but short commissure consisting of a few layers of similar cells. The rudiment of the originally paired cerebral ganglion, which is situated dorsally at the sides of the cecal rudiment of the cesophagus, constantly becomes broader and thicker with the development of the embryo; so that towards the end of the third period the commissure of the two halves, which was originally well defined, disappears, and the ganglion forms a rather large compact mass. ‘Two paired compact aggregations of cells of the middle lamella, observable as early as the fourth day of the second period, which lie behind the rather distant rudiments of the auditory organs, divide gra- dually in the first half of the third period, to form the paired rudiments of the pedal and visceral ganglia. The two halves of the former grow rather rapidly ; and in the second half of the third period, when the cephalic lobes approach each other, the united two form a crescentic ganglion, occupying the greater part of the anterior cephalic lobe, and lying above the auditory organs. Its upper part is on the same level as the buccal aperture, and somewhat higher than the opposite cerebral ganglion, which it touches with its sides. The visceral ganglion, lying just behind this, consisting at first of two subsequently coalescent halves, is developed in the same manner. All the three above-mentioned originally paired ganglia (the cerebral, visceral, and pedal ganglia) gradually approach each other, and unite to form an cesophageal nerve-mass only towards the close of embryonic life. Their union takes place very slowly, keeping pace with the diminu- 220 M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. tion of the nutritive vitellus which lies between them in the head and in the so-called neck. In the second half of the third period the paired rudiments of the superior and inferior moat ganglia make their appearance on each side of the pharynx, composed of small spherical compact aggregations of cells of the middle lamella. At the same time and in the same manner originate the ganglia stellata, in the position in which they are found in adult Behalonuiawsind also the large spherical ganglion splanchnicum, which is_ situated between the stomach and the two halves of the liver. The internal structure of all the above-mentioned ganglia begins to become differentiated soon after they make their appearance. In the central part of the ganglia, which at first consist of rounded homogeneous cells of the middle lamella, appears a dark, finely granular mass (“ Punktsubstanz”’), con- sisting of very fine variously intercrossed fibrillar threads— fine processes of the original cells of the middle lamella, now gradually being converted into small brown nerve-cells. As early as the close of the first half of the third period, especially in the peripheral part of the optic ganglia, in various parts of the cerebral ganglia, and subsequently also in all the other ganglia, we may distinctly observe the production both of the inner thin nerve-bundles serving as commissures to the different parts of the ganglia and of those running outwards (e. g. the broad but short optic nerves which unite the peripheral part of the optic ganglia with the retina). ‘The peripheral nerves of the skin are developed towards the close of embryonic life independently of the ganglia, at the points which they after- nae occupy, from the elongated cells of the dermo-muscular layer, which unite with each other. I have obtained all these briefly reported results chiefly by the comparative study of different sections belonging to different stages of development, a more or less accurate examination of the nervous system in living embryos being almost impossible on account of their opacity. As itis rather difficult without figures, to describe the various changes in the form and posi- tion of all the parts of the nervous system, I here conclude my description of that system, keeping the details for a more complete memoir with plates, which will soon appear. In all the Cephalopoda investigated by me it is not alone the upper germ-lamella, as Metschnikoff thinks *, but also, and, indeed, chiefly, the dermo-muscular layer of the middle lamella that is implicated in the formation of the different dermal layers. The skin begins to be differentiated in the first days of the third period (in Loligo and Sepiola approxi- mately on the nineteenth, in Argonauta on the fourteenth or * Loe, cit. p. 37. M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. 221 fifteenth day of development). The upper psa agin forms only the epidermis, composed of , cylindrical, everywhere similar cells, covered in many Eo (especially on the mantle) in the rotating embryo with cilia. The outer, very thin layer of elongated cells of the dermo-muscular layer forms the so- called fibrous layer ; whilst the chromatophores, and especially the fibres of muscular and connective tissue which lie in the cortum (cutis), are formed from the inner layers. The chro- matophores originate in the first half of the third period, from large round, at first nucleated cells of the dermo-muscular layer. The coloured protoplasm of these cells shrivels at the time when a very thick membrane appears upon the cell; by this means the nucleus becomes invisible. Such newly formed chromatophores, appearing first on the mantle and afterwards on the head and arms, begin to contract when the cells radiately arranged round them stretch into a spindle- shape, and thus form the contractile muscular fibres long since described by Keferstein * and Bohl f. I do not consider it necessary to describe here the formation of the cartilage in its details, as all that I have observed with respect to it in Sepia, Loligo, and Argonauta agrees perfectly with the results obtained by Metschnikofft in the case of Sepiola. There is no doubt that all the cartilages differentiated in the third period (the cartilages of the cups, the eye-covers, the head, the fins, &c.) are developed from considerable thickenings (e. g. in the anterior cephalic lobe not far from the eyes) of the upper germ-lamella, at the spots where they are afterwards found in the adult animal. With regard to the development of the paired olfactory organ of the Cephalopoda, which lies on the ventral side behind the eyes and appears towards the end of the third period (Sepia, Loligo, Sepiola), originally in the form of a tubercle and then of a pit-like depression of the upper lamella, I can only confirm the observations of Kélliker§, Metsch- nikoff ||, and T'schernoff §. With this I conclude the exposition of the results of my investigations of the development of the four above-mentioned species of Cephalopoda, which lasted uninterruptedly almost two years. At present engaged in extending and completing these studies, I hope soon to be able to publish a more detailed memoir. [To be continued. | * Bronn’s Klassen und Ordn, Bd. iii. Abth. ii. p. 1324. + Beitr. zur vergl. Histol. p. 70, pl. iii. figs. 40 & 41. { Loe. cit. pp. 39 et seq. § Loe. cit. pp. 107 et seg. || Loe. cit. p. 53, {| Bull Soc. Imp. Nat. Mosc. 1869, p. 87, pl. i. 222 Mr. A. G. Butler on new Species of XXIX.—On some new Species of Butterflies from Tropi- cal America. By Artnur Garpiner Butter, F.L.S8., F.Z.8., &e. THE following species are chiefly interesting additions to our knowledge ’of the Rhopalocerous fauna of ‘Veragua, the An- tirrhea and Daptonura being most valuable, on account of the limited number of species in both genera hitherto recorded. Family Nymphalide. Subfamily Sarrriz, Bates. Genus ANTIRRH2ZA, Westwood. 1. Antirrhea tomasia, n. sp. Allied to A. miltiades; primaries above more like A. phila- retes, the transverse discal bar being indistinct ; secondaries darker in the male, rather paler in the female, with one small subapical white dot, no other markings; fringe sordid, not bright yellow as in A. miltiades: wings below almost as in A. philaretes, but richer in colour; the central band broader and more strongly angulated in secondaries than in any known species ; its external whitish marginal bar much narrower, scarcely indicated from the costa of secondaries to the third median branch, but wide and continuous from the first branch to the anal angle; the ocelliferous patch on median inter- spaces chiefly differing from that of A. philopemen in conse- quence of the encroachment of the angular outer edge of the central band; external border tinted with tawny. Expanse of wings, ¢3 inches 9 lines, ? 4 inches 3 lines. Hab. Bugaba, Veragua. Type, coll. H. Druce. Subfamily Nrwpzariwz, Bates. Genus Papua, Fabricius. 2. Paphia Ada, n. sp.” Wings above blue-black, with brighter blue gloss at base ; primaries with a pale greenish-blue maculated band (composed of seven spots), angulated near apex, running from the third fifth of the subcostal nervure to the end of the submedian ; secondaries with the costal area black-brown ; abdominal area pale rosy brown, clothed along submedian nervure and towards anal angle with long dark brown hairs: body above greenish black : wings below very similar to P. meris, but without the tail, chocolate-brown, sericeous, hatched and banded with dull Butterflies from Tropical America. 223 brown ‘and irrorated with dead silver; primaries with outer margin and an oblique streak to apex silver; secondaries with a submarginal series of five silver dots near anal angle: legs and palpi below pepper-and-salt colour. Expanse of wings 2 inches 8 lines. Hab. Bugaba, Veragua, and Bogota (Lindig). Type, coll. Druce. There is an example of this species in the collection of the British Museum from Bogota. The species is allied to P. xenocrates, but much smaller, the primaries above being more like P. psammis. 3. Paphia rutilans, u. sp. Wings above glossy magenta-red, with blue reflections ; primaries with apical half from basal third of costa to external angle sepia-brown, partly shot with blue, crossed near apex by a short, irregular, oblique magenta band (not reaching costa or outer margin); a lunulated dark brown bar from third median branch at its basal third to third fifth of submedian nervure ; secondaries with costa, apex, a lunate spot near apex, and outer margin sepia-brown; abdominal area pale brown; body olive-brown: wings below red-brown, hatched all over with grey, clouded, spotted, and banded with dark brown, as in P. centaurus; secondaries with four minute white anal submarginal dots: body whity brown, speckled with red-brown. Expanse of wings 2 inches 6 lines. Hab, Pucartambo, Peru (Whitely). Type, B.M. Coloured much like P. centaurus, but more like P. ryphea in form, size, and pattern. Subfamily Hzzrconmz, Bates. Genus Heticonius, Fabricius. 4, Heliconius clarescens, n. sp. Closely allied to H. telchinia, but differing in the restriction of the discoidal black streak of primaries to a short oblique spot above the origin of the first median branch, the absence of the internal streak, the yellow tint at termination of the fulvous area, and the absence of the black elliptical band of secondaries ; wings below with the same differences. Expanse of wings 3 inches 8 lines. Hab. Bugaba, Veragua. Type, coll. Druce. Probably a mimic of Mechanitis macrinus. 224 On new Species of Butterflies. 5. Heliconius supertoris, n. sp. Nearly allied to H. nwmata, but with the yellow band of primaries tinted externally with tawny, the two spots on median interspaces and the streak from outer margin (at end of yellow band) united together; discoidal spot and_ streak enlarged, sometimes connected; tawny macular discal bar narrower; marginal border wider, dotted with buff: differ- ences below as above, excepting that the secondaries have the usual submarginal row of white dashes. Expanse of wings 3 inches 3-7 lines. Hab, Ega and Villa Nova (Bates). Type, B.M. This species is intermediate in character between H. nuwmata and H. metalilis. 6. Heliconius nubifer, n. sp. Differs from the preceding in having all the tawny area clouded with mahogany-colour, with the black bars wider; no yellow spot on under surface of secondaries. Expanse of wings 3 inches 1 line. Hab. Fonteboa (Bates). Type, B.M. One of the many mimics of Mechanitis egaensis of Bates. Family Papilionide. Subfamily Prez, Bates. Genus DapronuRA, Butler. 7. Daptonura florinda, n. sp. g. Wings above sulphur-yellow; the apex, outer margin and costa of primaries (excepting a pyriform spot at base), and the outer margin of secondaries narrowly black: head black, clothed with grey and cream-coloured hairs; thorax grey, scantily clothed at the sides with pale yellow hairs; abdomen sulphur-yellow, greyish towards base: wings below deeper yellow than above, margins paler brown; primaries with a discocellular transverse streak, widening upon the costa; four apical submarginal yellow spots ; secondaries with the base orange; pectus orange at the sides, anal valves white. Expanse of wings 2 inches 9 lines. Q. Primaries gamboge-yellow, with the base and internal area diffusely saffron, an oblique discocellular brown streak ; outer margin more broadly brown than in the male, and Royal Society. 225 sinuated internally ; secondaries saffron- yellow, with a wider brown border; body tinted with saffron ; otherwise as in the male: primaries below almost as in the male, but with six marginal yellow spots; secondaries saffron-yellow, with a broader brown border. Expanse of wings 2 inches 9 lines. Hab. Bugaba, Veragua. Type, coll. Druce. Var. ? monstrosa. ¢. Smaller and altogether paler than the preceding ; pri- maries above white, the apex with a broader and more strongly sinuated black-brown border; secondaries yellowish white, becoming sulphur-yellow close to the margin, which has a broader border than in the preceding species ; primaries below also paler, excepting at apex, with no apical yellow spots, and a more slender discocellular bar ; secondaries with broader marginal border and with the orange confined to the base of costa. Expanse of wings 2 inches 6 lines. Hab. Bugaba, Veragua. Type, coll. Druce. The above may turn out to be distinct from D. florinda. It is not only smaller and different in coloration, but the primaries are narrower and their outer margin is more di- stinctly incurved. Both forms approach D. ¢sandra in form and marking; but in the ground-colour of the wings D. florinda 3 is like D. polyhymnia, D. florinda 2 more like D. leucanthe 2 , and var.? monstrosa like D. pantoporia 3. PROCEEDINGS OF LEARNED SOCIETIES. ROYAL SOCIETY. December 17, 1874.—Joseph Dalton Hooker, C.B., President, in the Chair. “ Preliminary Note upon the Brain and Skull of Amphiowus lanceolatus.” By T. H. Huxtey, Sec. R.S. The singular little fish Amphiowus lanceolatus has been uni- versally regarded as an extremely anomalous member of the Ver- tebrate series, by reason of the supposed absence of renal organs and of any proper skull and brain. On these grounds, chiefly, Agassiz proposed to separate it from all other fishes ; and Haeckel, going further, made a distinct division of the Vertebrata (Acrania) 226 Royal Society :-— for its reception; while Semper*, in a lately published paper, sepa- rates it from the Vertebrata altogether. In a recent communication to the Linnean Society, I have de- scribed what I believe to be the representative of the ducts of the Wolffian bodies, or “ primordial kidneys ” of the higher Vertebrata, in Amphiowus ; and 1 propose, in this preliminary notice, to point out that although Amphioawus has no completely differentiated brain or skull, yet it possesses very well-marked and relatively large divisions of the cerebro-spinal nervous axis and of the spinal column, which answer to the encephalon and the cranium of the higher Vertebrata. The oral aperture of Amphiowus is large, of a long oval shape, and fringed by tentacles, external to which lies a lip, which is continuous behind with the ventro-lateral ridge of the body. The oral chamber is spacious, and extends back to the level of the junction between the sixth and seventh myotomes (fig. A). Here it is divided from the branchial cavity by a peculiarly constructed, muscular velum palati, the upper attachment of which to the ventral aspect of the sheath of the notochord lies vertically below the anterior angle of the seventh myotome. Eight pairs of nerves are given off from the cerebro-spinal axis as far as this point. ‘The eighth, or most posterior, of these, which, for convenience, may be called h, passes out between the sixth and seventh myotomes, and runs down parallel with the lateral attachment of the velum. The next five (9, f, ¢, d, ¢) pass out between the first six myotomes, and are distributed by their dorsal and ventral branches to those myotomes, to the integument, and to the walls of the buccal cavity. The foremost two nerves (6 and a) pass in front of the first myotome; and the nerve a runs parallel with the upperside of the notochord to the end of the snout, giving off branches to that region of the body which lies in front of the mouth. This nerve lies above the eye- spot. J In the Marsipobranch fishes Myaine and Ammocetes (now known to be a young condition of Petromyzon) a velum also separates the buceal from the branchial cavity (figs. B,C, D). But this velum is in connexion with the hyoidean arch. The resemblance of the buccal cavity, with its tentacles, in Ammocetes to the corresponding cavity in Amphiowus is so close, that there can be no doubt that the two are homologous. In the Ammocetes there is a hyoidean cleft which has hitherto been overlooked. The auditory sae lies at the dorsal end of the arch and above the dorsal attachment of the velum. The latter, therefore, corresponds with the auditory region of the skull ; and the nerve / should answer to the last of the preauditory* cranial nerves, which is the portio dura, Assuming this to be the case, though the detailed homologies of the cranial nerves of the higher Vertebrata are yet to be worked out, it follows that the segment of the cerebro-spinal axis which in Amphiowus * “Tie Stammverwandtschaft der Wirbelthiere und Wirbellosen,”’ Arbeiten aus dem zool.-zootom. Institut in Wurzburg, Bd. ii. 1874, p. 42. On the Brain and Shull of Amphioxus Na lanceolatus. 227 228 Royal Society :-— lies between the origin of the nerve / and the eye, answers to all that part of the brain which lies between the origin of the seventh nerve of Petromyzon and the optic nerve. Consequently the lateral walls of the neural canal in the same region answer to that region of the skull in Petromyzon which lies between the origin of the seventh and the origin of the optic nerve. Hence, as each myo- tome of Amphioxus represents the corresponding portion of a protovertebra, it follows that the same region of the skull in the Lamprey and other Vertebrata represents, at fewest, six protover- tebrx, almost all traces of which are lost, even in the embryo con- dition of the higher Vertebrata. It may further be concluded that the several pairs of nerves which leave the cerebro-spinal axis, between those which answer to the portio dura and the optic nerve, in Amphiowus, are repre- sented by the third, fourth, fifth, and sixth pairs of cranial nerves of the higher Vertebrata. The nerve a, in fact, has the charac- teristic course and distribution of the orbito-nasal division of the trigeminal ; while, without at present drawing a closer parallel, it is easy to see that the nerves b,c, d, e,f, and g, with their respective myotomes, supply the requisite materials for meta- morphosis into the oculomotor, pathetic, trigeminal, and abducens nerves, with the muscles of the eye and of the jaws, in the more differentiated vertebrate types. Thus that part of the cerebro-spinal axis of Amphiowus which lies in front of the seventh myotome answers to the preauditory part of the brain in the higher Vertebrata, and the corresponding part of the head to the trabecular region of the skull in them. On the other hand, from the seventh myotome backwards, a certain number of segments answer to the postauditory, or parachordal, region of the skull of the higher Vertebrata. The answer to the question, how many? involves sundry con- siderations. It must be recollected that though the branchial chamber of Amphiowus is the homologue of the branchial chamber of other Vertebrata, it does not necessarily follow that the im- ~ perfect branchial skeleton of Amphiowus corresponds with their branchial skeleton. The branchial skeleton of the higher Verte- brata consists of cartilaginous rods, which seem to be developed in the somatopleure, and to be homologous with the ribs, while the branchial skeleton of Amphiowus consists of fibrous bands appa- rently developed in the splanchnopleure. The branchial arches of the higher Vertebrata, in accordance with their essentially costal nature, receive their innervation from the glosso-pharyngeal and pneumogastric nerves, which are homologues of spinal nerves; and, in seeking for the posterior limits of that region in Amphioxus which corresponds with the skull and brain in other Vertebrates, we must only take into account as many pairs of those nerves which arise from the cerebro-spinal axis as we know are, in the Vertebrata next above Amphioxus, devoted to the branchial arches. In none of these are there more than seven pairs of branchial arches; so that not On the Brain and Skull of Amphioxus lanceolatus. 229 more than eight myotomes (and consequently protovertebre) of Amphiowus, in addition to those already mentioned, can be reckoned as the equivalents of the parachordal region of the skull in the higher Vertebrates. Thus it would appear that the cranium of the latter is represented by those segments of the body of Amphiowus which lie in front of the fifteenth, counting from before backwards, and that their cranial nerves are represented by the corresponding anterior pairs of nerves in Amphio«us. In all Vertebrata above Amphiovus the nerves which answer to the seven posterior pairs in Amphiovus unite into one or two trunks on each side, and give rise to the nerves called pneumo- gastric and glosso-pharyngeal ; and as these pass out of the skull in front of the occipital segment, it would appear that this seg- ment is, in the main, the result of the chondrification, with or without subsequent ossification, of the fourteenth protovertebra. There is no evidence, at present, that the ear-capsule repre- sents a modification of any part of the vertebral skeleton, nor that the trabeculx are any thing but an anterior pair of visceral arches. And if these parts have nothing to do with centra, or arches, of vertebrie, it follows that the numerous protovertebre which lie in front of the fourteenth in Amphiowus, are represented only by muscles and nerves in the higher Vertebrata. The anterior end of the cerebro-spinal axis of Amphioxus answers to the Jamina terminalis of the thalamencephalon of the higher Vertebrata, the cerebral hemispheres and olfactory lobes remaining undeveloped. If the auditory nerve is, as Gegenbaur has suggested, the dorsal branch of a single nerve which represents both the portio dura and the portio mollis, the auditory organ of Amphioxus is to be sought in connexion with the dorsal branch of its eighth nerve. I have found nothing representing an auditory organ in this posi- tion; and I can only conclude that Amphioxus really has no auditory apparatus. In all other respects, however, it conforms to the Vertebrate type; and, considering its resemblance to the early stages of Petromyzon described by Schultze, I can see no reason for removing it from the class Pisces. But its perma- nently segmented skull and its many other peculiarities suggest that it should be regarded as the type of a primary division or subclass of the class Pisces, to which the name of Entomocrania may be applied, in contrast to the rest, in which the primary segmentation of the skull is lost, and which may be termed Holocrania. On a future occasion I propose to show in what manner the skull of the Marsipobranch is related to that of the higher Vertebrata, and more especially to the skull of the Frog - in its young tadpole state. EXPLANATION OF THE FIGURES. A, C, D are diagrammatic, but accurate, representations of the anterior part of the body in Amphiorus (A), in an Ammocete 1-6 inch long (C), and in a fully grown Ammocete 5:7 inches long (D). B is a copy of the Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Ser. 4. Vol. xv. 16 230 Miscellaneous. furthest advanced stage of the young Petromyzon Planeri six weeks after hatching, as figured by Schultze in’ his memoir on the development of that fish. The figures are magnified to the same vertical dimension, so as to afford a means of estimating, roughly, the changes in the propor- tional growth of the various parts of the head of the Lamprey in its pro- gress from the embryonic towards the adult condition. In C, the brain is already differentiated into the three primary vesicles and the vesicles of the cerebral hemispheres, though they are not shown, the whole brain being merely indicated by the dark shading. The trabecule (7'r), which have already united in front, are indicated, but not the semilunar ethmoidal cartilage, which lies above and behind the nasal sac. In D, neither the ethmoidal nor the trabecular cartilages are shown, but the contour of the brain is indicated; and the manner in which the longitudinal muscles (which represent the anterior myotomes of Ainpliozusy are arranged is shown. The tentacles of Amphiorus are represented by the tentacles of the Ammocete, the hood-like “upper lip” of the latter obviously answering to the median prolongation of the head of Amphioxrus with the two lateral folds of integument which lie outside the bases of the tentacles and are continued back into the ventro-lateral ridges. The relative shorten- ing of the notochord, and lengthening of that region of the brain which lies in front of the origins of the optic nerves, in C, as compared with B, is remarkable. A line is drawn in all the figures through the anterior margin of the nasal sacs (Na—Na); another has the same relation to the eyes (Op—Op) : and a third (Hy-Hy) passes through the region of the auditory sac and hyoidean arch. 1, 2, 3, hyoidean and first and second branchial clefts of Ammocertes; 1., 1t., 11, Iv., &e., myotomes of Amphiorus; My, mye- lon or spinal cord; Ch, notochord. MISCELLANEOUS. On the Gammaride of Lake Baikal. By Dr. B. N. Dynowsry. Tunis memoir reveals to us the existence in Lake Baikal of an Amphipodous fauna remarkable for an abundance and variety of specific forms such as we certainly had no reason to expect. Gerstfeldt, in a memoir published in 1858, described seven species of Gammarus found in different rivers of Siberia and in Lake Baikal. From what we know of freshwater faunas there was not much reason to suppose that this number would be greatly augmented ; but Dr. Dybowsky now makes known 97 species of Gammaride, nearly all of which are new. They come almost exclusively from Lake Baikal, only a few of them in summer ascending the mouths of its tributaries; and there are very few which permanently inhabit the rivers. We do not think that any region of the globe has furnished a contingent of freshwater Amphipoda which approaches this in number of species. It is curious, for example, to compare the fauna of Siberia, in this respect, with that of Norway, which we know from the fine memoir of G. O. Sars*. In Norway the freshwater Gammaride are represented only by four species; that is to say, they are only one twenty-fourth the number of those of Lake '* G. O. Sars, ‘Histoire Naturelle des Crustacés d’eau douce de Nor- vége: Malacostracés.’ Christiania, 1867. Miscellaneous. 231 Baikal. One of the Scandinavian species, Gammarus (Pallasea) cancelloides, occurs also in Siberia; another, Gammarus neglectus, is scarcely distinct from Gammarus pulex, which forms part of the fauna of Lake Baikal. If we compare the relative number of genera admitted by the two authors, we find a remarkable differ- ence; thus Dr. Dybowsky only admits two genera for his 97 species (Gammarus 96 species, Constantia, g. n., 1 species), while the four species of M. Sars belong to four different genera. But the genus is something much more subjective than the species ; and we have no doubt that, if treated by some authors (Mr. Spence Bate, for ex- ample), the Gammaride of Lake Baikal would have furnished materials for the creation of numerous generic groups. Gammarus cancelloides, Gerstf., retained by Dr. Dybowsky in its original genus, is the Pallasea cancelloides of Spence Bate and Sars. Dr. Dybowsky explains the reason why he has not dismembered the genus Gammarus—namely, that the modifications observed in the different parts of the body present numerous gradations which bind together the most extreme forms into one whole. It may also be observed that the gradual transitions presented by each group of organs or each part have no correlations with those detected in other parts of the organism. In the most widely separated species we find a similar structure of certain parts, which, on the other hand, are very dissimilar in nearly allied species. There is a sort of inter- lacing of characters which only allows of the establishment of arti- ficial sections, and justifies, it seems to us, the course followed by the author. The only new genus, which he has named Constantia, is distin- guished by the structure of its two pairs of antenne, which are modified so as to form locomotive organs. Their flagella are desti- tute of sensory organs, and furnished with two rows of long, rigid setee, which give them a plumose appearance. There is nv appen- dicular flagellum. All the legs are long and slender, especially the second pair of walking-feet (fourth pereiopoda) and the first pair of jumping-feet. The only species belonging to the genus (C. Branickii) does not keep at the bottom like the Gammari; it is pelagic, and, like other surface Crustacea, has a completely transparent body, so that it can only be perceived in the water in consequence of its black eyes. In reading what the author says of it, it is impossible not to think of Cystosoma Neptuni, another almost perfectly transparent Amphipod, which leads a pelagic existence in the Atlantic and In- dian Oceans. Notwithstanding the gradual modifications which they present in their different organs, the Siberian species of the genus Gammarus are sufficiently distinct from each other in their general characters; indeed a considerable number are remarkable for their forms, pro- portions, or ornaments. Some comparatively gigantic species attain a total length of from 118 to 120 millims. (nearly 5 inches) ; but the small species are much more abundant, and there are even dwarfish forms of which the total length does not exceed 7 or 8 millims. 16# 232 Miscellaneous. All depths of the lake have furnished Gammaride. The greatest depth to which the author has hitherto carried his dredgings, namely 1373 metres, proved to be as well peopled as the littoral zone, although the number of species was less than at higher levels. However, this comparative poverty seems to be attributable to the fact that the exploration of great depths is attended with great dif- ficulties. Dr. Dybowsky has no doubt that more regular investiga- tions carried on between 500 and 1300 metres would be recompensed by the discovery of new species. Most of the Gammaridie of Lake Baikal which live at small depths are vividly coloured; but with the increase of depth the coloration gradually diminishes, and the species living below 700 metres are more or less whitish in tint. Some varieties, coming from greater depths than those inhabited by the specific type, are distinguished by the paleness of their bodies and eyes, and also, in some cases, by the more elongated and slender form of their locomotive appendages.— Hore Soc. Ent. Ross. Bd. x. Supplement; Bibl. Univ., Bull. Sei. 1874, p. 372. On the Mode in which Amceba swallows its Food. By Prof. J. Lerpy. The author remarked that he had supposed that Ameba swallows food by this becoming adherent to the body and then enveloped, much as insects become caught and involved in syrup or other viscid substances. He had repeatedly observed a large Ameba, which he supposes to be A. princeps, creep into the interstices of a mass of mud and appear on the other side without a particle ad- herent. On one occasion he had accidentally noticed an Ameba with an active flagellate infusorium, a Urocentrum, included between two of its finger-like pseudopods. It so happened that the ends of these were in contact with a confervous filament; and the glasses above and below, between which the Ameba was examined, effec- tually prevented the Urocentrum from escaping. ‘The condition of imprisonment of the latter was so peculiar that he was led to watch it. The ends of the two pseudopods of the Ameba gradually ap- proached, came into contaet, and then actually became fused—a thing which he had never before observed with the pseudopods of an Ameba. The Urocentrum continued to move actively back and forth, endeavouring to escape. At the next moment a delicate film of the ectosare proceeded from the body of the Amaba, above and below, and gradually extended outwardly so as to convert the circle of the pseudopods into a complete sac, enclosing the Urocentrum. Another of these creatures was noticed within the Ameba, which appeared to have been enclosed in the same manner. This observation would make it appear that the food of the Ameba ordinarily does not simply adhere to the body, and then sink into its substance, but rather, after becoming adherent to or covered by the pseudopods or body, is then enclosed by the active extension of a film of ectosare around it.—Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philad, p. 143, Miscellaneous. 233 On the Discovery of true Batrachians in Paleozoic Rocks. By M. A. Gavopry. Hitherto Batrachians of existing types seemed to be of recent geological date; most paleontologists believed that these animals did not occur in any formations more ancient than the Tertiaries. There was some ground for astonishment that Vertebrata of such low organization should have come upon the earth so late; and this fact seemed to be in opposition to most of those which paleontology has registered. I have the honour to bring before the Academy some remains of Batrachians which have just been discovered in Paleozoic rocks. One of them was communicated to me some months since by M. Loustau, engineer on the Northern Railway; it was collected by M. Roche in the bituminous schists of Permian age at Igornay (Sadne-et-Loire). A few days ago M. Francois Delille brought me a slab upon which may be seen seven little Batrachians, which closely resemble those of Igornay. He obtained it at Millery (Sadne- et-Loire); and, lke the specimen from Igornay, this slab was pro- cured from bituminous schists of Permian age. I propose to give the Batrachians of Igornay and Millery the name of Salamandrella petrolei, to indicate that they have affinities with the salamanders, and to note that they have been buried in deposits from which petroleum is extracted. They are very small: the individual communicated to me by M. Loustau is 30 millims. in length from the outer edge of the muzzle to the extremity of the tail; and the largest of the individuals found by M. Delille is only 35 millims. Notwithstanding their small size, it is probable that they were adult ; for the heads, tails, and limbs of the different ex- amples are clearly of the same proportions. The heads are broader than long, triangular, and much flattened: as not one of them is placed on its side, I think that this flattening is natural and not merely the result of the compression of the beds. The orbits are very large and elongated ; we see no place for the postorbitals and suprasquamosals, which are so much developed in the Ganocephali. The vertebree have the centrum ossified: I count 29 of them, viz. 3 cervical, 10 dorsal, 8 lumbar, and 8 caudal, the last very much reduced. The cervical and dorsal vertebree have arched ribs, much shorter than those of the Ganocephali. I have not been able to perceive any indications of the entosternum and episterna, so re- markable in the Ganocephali and Labyrinthodonts. The fore and hind limbs are nearly of the same size; both are furnished with four digits. I see no traces of scales which could be attributed to the Salamandrella; and, indeed, I cannot distinguish around the skeleton any deposit or coloration indicating a hardened skin, which would have persisted longer than the other soft organs. One cannot help being struck by the resemblance of the little Batrachians of Igornay and Millery to the terrestrial salamanders. Nevertheless their head is a little broader ; the bones of their limbs seem to have had the extremities less well-defined; the hind limbs 234 Miscellaneous. are directed backward, as in swimming animals. ‘he dorsal and lumbar vertebra are shorter and more numerous ; the lumbar ver- tebre bear no ribs; the tail represents only one fifth of the whole length of the body, whilst in the salamanders it equals nearly the half, The Salamandrella is very distinct from the reptiles of the Car- boniferous formation which have been described under the names of Labyrinthodonts, Ganocephali, and Microsaurians (such as Dendrer- peton, Hyler, ‘peton, Hylonomus, Parabatrachus, Anthracher peton, Uro- cordylus, C ‘eraterpeton, Sauropleura, Molgophis, &e.); but it differs less ‘widely from Raniceps (Pelion) Lyell trom Ohio. Now that the existence of true Batrachians in the Paleozoic rocks seems to be proved, probably no difficulty will be raised to placing Raniceps among those animals, as was proposed by Mr. Wyman in 1858. Itis probable that Raniceps had a naked skin, and that it possessed no entosternum, episternum, postorbital, or subsquamosal., Nevertheless it cannot belong to the same genus as the fossils of MM. Loustau and Delille; its vertebrae are much more elongated, its frontals are less widened, the supraoccipital is thrown less back- wards, and its mandibles are more prolonged. Lastly, the animal from Ohio i is three times as large. In 1844 Hermann von Meyer described, under the name of Apateon pedestris, the impression of a reptile ‘found i in the Carboni- ferous formation of Miinster-Appel. Notwithstanding the opinion of this talented palzeontologist, I think that it belonged to an animal of the group of salamanders ; and if it were allowable to form a judg- ment from an impression so vague as that of Apateon, I should be inclined to believe this fossil to be identical with Salamandrella petrolec. Thus we should be acquainted with true Batrachians in the Paleozoic rocks of France, the United States, and Germany. The bituminous schists which contain Salamandrella petrolei also include remains of plants, numerous coprolites, and fishes (Palao- niscus). M. Loustau has communicated to me a small crustacean derived from them, a series of well-ossified vertebre of a still unknown reptile, and a fragment of a humerus or femur agreeing in size with that of Actinodon Frossardi, a curious Ganocephalous reptile, also collected in the bituminous schist, at Muse, not far from Igornay and Millery, which I brought before the Academy in 1866, To complete the list of Paleeozoic reptiles found in France, I must remark that M. Paul Gervais has described a reptile from the Permian schists of Lodéve under the name of Aphelosaurus ; that learned naturalist has shown that it is very distinct from the Batrachians.— Comptes Rendus, February 15, 1875, p. 441. On the Motive Power of Diatoms. By Prof. J. Lermy. While the cause of motion remains unknown, some of the uses are obvious. The power is considerable, and enables these minute organisms, when mingled with mud, readily to extricate themselves and rise to the surface, where they may receive the influence of Miscellaneous. 235 light and air. In examining the surface-mud of a shallow rain- water pool, in a recent excavation in brick-clay, the author found little else but an abundance of minute diatoms. He was not suffi- ciently familiar with the diatoms to name the species; but it re- sembled Navicula radiosa. The little diatoms were very active, gliding hither and thither, and knocking the quartz-sand grains about. Noticing the latter, he made some comparative measure- ments, and found that the Navicule would move grains of sand as much as twenty-five times their own superficial area, and probably fifty times their own bulk and weight, or perhaps more.—Proc. Acad. Jat. Sci. Philad. p. 113. On the Peripheral Nervous System of the Marine Nematoids. By M. A. Vittor. The marine Nematoids possess well-characterized organs of sense, consisting :—1, of organs of touch, represented by numerous sete or papille distributed over the whole surface of the body, but par- ticularly abundant round the head and the genital orifice; 2, of an apparatus of vision, composed of two eyes, of rather complex structure, situated on the dorsal surface towards the anterior ex- tremity. Thenature of these different organs ought not to be doubt- ful; but the fact is that their relations with the nervous system have hitherto been very obscure. According to M. Marion * nervous filaments penetrate obliquely “into the midst of the longitudinal muscles to arrive soon at a fusiform, nucleolated cell, itself situated at the base of a cuticular hair, and united with this hair by another nervous thread which terminates at the base of the hair.” M. Biitschli, whose memoir is very recent?, has figured an analo- gous arrangement; but he states that he has not detected the fusi- form cell described by the French writer. He expresses himself as follows :—‘‘ Marion states with regard to his Thoracostoma setigerum, that a little before the entrance into the setule a fusiform cell is in- terposed in each of these filaments ; with the exception of ganglii- form dilatations, which, however, seem to me to have no regular occurrence, I have detected nothing which could be interpreted in favour of this observation.” In presence of these contradictory assertions it became necessary to undertake fresh researches, and to subject those which had been made to the check of the experimental method. Hence my atten- tion was directed most particularly to this point when, in the month of May last, I commenced my investigation of the Helmintha of our shores, in the laboratory of Professor de Lacaze-Duthiers. Now it appears from my numerous observations made at Roscoff upon living individuals, and repeated at Paris upon my preparations, that the two naturalists whom I have just cited have been deceived by false * “ Additions aux recherches sur les Nématoides libres du Golfe de Merseille,’” Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool. 5¢ série, tom. xix. p. 13, pl. xx. fig. 1. + Zur Kenntniss der freilebenden Nematoden, insbesondere der des Kieler Hafens, p. 8, pl. iv. fig. 19, & (1874). 236 Miscellaneous. appearances, due probably to compression, and that they have not seen the true arrangement of the peripheral nervous system of these little creatures. As this arrangement is really very remarkable, I shall now give a short description of it. Beneath the cuticle, which is smooth or striated, but always structureless, we find a very thin and very refractive granular layer. This layer has neither been figured nor described by M. Marion; but Dr. Charlton Bastian*, in 1866, indicated it very clearly, and even recognized that it contained cells. To investigate it properly it is necessary to macerate entire worms in a mixture of acetic acid, alcohol, glycerine, and water—a mixture which has already rendered me great service in many cases, and the formula of which I have given in my ‘Monographie des Dragonneaux.’ The marine Nematoids, when immersed in this liquid, quickly be- came perfectly transparent. We can then see very distinctly that the granular layer situated between the skin and the muscles con- sists in great part of very fine fatty granules, and that it contains, scattered through it, small stellate cells furnished with a very re- fractive nucleus. The relations of these little cellular bodies to the sete or papille are easily ascertained. In a longitudinal section we perceive very distinctly that from the apex of each cell, perpendicularly to the axis of the animal, issues a very delicate thread which, after having tra- versed the whole thickness of the cuticle, arrives at the base of the papilla and enters it ; but each cell also furnishes laterally a certain number of processes which place it in relation with the neighbouring cells ; and it is equally easy to ascertain this, if, instead of making a section of the animal, we endeavour to follow the granular layer over a certain portion of its surface, by gradually raising the object- glass of the microscope. The subcutaneous layer of the marine Nematoids, therefore, contains a true network of ganglionic cells, which furnish nervous threads both .to the organs of touch and to the organs of vision. This peripheral network is in relation with the central nervous system by means of a plexus, which traverses the muscular layer and unites the ventral nerve with the subcutaneous layer. These are undoubtedly facts of detail and of delicate observation ; but still they are of importance, for they are not isolated. It will suffice for me to recall that various observers have indicated a very analogous network in the Actinie, and that I have myself described one exactly similar in Gordius. This network arrangement of the ganglionic cells is certainly less rare in the Invertebrata than has hitherto been supposed; and it is probable that it represents in itself the whole of the nervous system of inferior types.—Comptes Rendus, February 8, 1875, p. 400. * “On the Anatomy and Physiology of the Nematoids, parasitic and free,’ Phil. Trans. 1866, vol. elvi. part 2, pl. xxviii. fig. 36, d. THE ANNALS MAGAZINE OF NATURAL HISTORY. [FOURTH SERIES. ] No. 88. APRIL 1875. XXX.—On the Structure and Systematic Position of the Genus Cheirolepis. By R. H. Traquarr, M.D., F.G.S., Keeper of the iy chal- Enters Collections in the Edin- burgh Museum of Science and Art. [Plate XVII. } THIS very interesting genus of Devonian fishes was originally described by the late Prof. Agassiz, in the second volume of his ‘ Poissons Fossiles,’ p. 178, and was then included by him in his family of “ Lepidoides.” The first step towards the breaking-up of that heterogeneous assemblage was taken by Agassiz himself, in the course of the publication of the same ae work, when he constituted the family of Acanthodide or the genera Chetracanthus, Acanthodes, and Cheirolepis ; and this classification was retained in his special work on the Fossil Fishes of the Old Red Sandstone. The founder of fossil ichthyology seems, however, to have had but a slight and not very correct conception of the structure of the fishes with which he associated Cheitrolepis, as may be seen both from his restored figures and his remark that, as the bones which he had been able to distinguish in Chetrolepis, “ such as the frontal, humerus, temporal, have the same structure as in ordinary osseous fishes,’ one may conclude “that the Acanthodians in general had a complete osseous system, and not merely a chorda dorsalis as in the Coccosted and other fishes of the same epoch” *. Subsequent investigations into * Poissons Fossiles du vieux Grés Rouge, p. 44. Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Ser. 4. Vol. xv. 238 Dr. R. H. Traquair on the Structure the structure of the true Acanthodide have long since shown that this generalization was rather hasty. Chetrolepis, how- ever, he considered as forming, by the absence of spiny rays to the fins and by its unequal dentition, the “ passage of the Acanthodians to the Sauroids.” Although the restored figure of Chezrolepis given by Agassiz in the ‘ Poissons Fossiles du vieux Grds Rouge,’ tab. D. fig. 4, is quite erroneous as regards the shape of the maxilla and of the opercular bones, he having aidaitly supposed that the bones of the head were conformed much as in the recent Salmonide, yet as regards his assertion of the presence of branchiostegal rays and of an unequal dentition (facts after- wards questioned by others) he was undoubtedly right. Our own countryman Hugh Miller, however, was shrewd enough to be impressed with the discrepancy of structure in Cheirolepis and the Chetracanthi and Diplacanthi, with which it had been classed ; and accordingly we find him, in his ‘ Old Red Sandstone,’ mentioning it as the type of a distinct family. Nor did these discrepancies escape the attention of Johannes Miiller, as may be seen from a brief passage in his paper “ Ueber den Bau und die Grenzen der Ganoiden”*. B Giebelft it was also disassociated from the Acanthodians and classed amongst his “‘ Heterocerci Monopterygii,” a group un- fortunately nearly as heterogeneous as Agassiz’s “ Lepidoides.” Nevertheless for years afterwards many eminent paleontolo- gists (such as Pictett, Quenstedt§, M‘Coy||, and Sir Philip Egerton {]) continued to class Chetrolepis along with the Acanthodide. Pander, however, in one of his justly celebrated essays on the Devonian fishes**, entered into the structure of Chetrolepis, and proposed to constitute for it an independent family, the Cheirolepint. Many of its head- and shoulder-bones were * Abhandl. der Berl. Akad. 1844, Phys. K]. p. 151. + ‘Fauna der Vorwelt,’ 1848, vol. i. p. 231. t ‘Traité de Paléontologie,’ 2me éd. t. ii. E 190. § ‘Handbuch der Petrefactenkunde * (1852), p. 192. That Quenstedt was nevertheless rather doubtful on this point may be inferred from the following passage, in his description of the Acanthodide :—“ Nur Chei- rolepis hat Fulcra an allen Flossen, und auf dem Riicken des Schwanzes ; dennoch halt ihn Agassiz auch fiir einen Acanthodier. Mégen auch alle diese Fische (ausser Chetrolepis) den lebenden Haien sich nicht unmittelbar anschliessen, so stehen sie ihnen doch gewiss niher als den folgenden Ganoiden.” || ‘ Paleeozoic Fossils,’ p: 580. § “Remarks on the Nomenclature of the Devonian Fishes,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. xvi. p. 123. ** ‘Ueber die Saurodipterinen, Dendrodonten, Glyptolepiden, und Chei- rolepiden des deyonischen Systems,’ St. Petersburg, 1860, pp. 69-73. and Systematic Position of Cheirolepis. 239 correctly identified by him ; but he failed to find the branchio- stegal rays and the two sizes of teeth described by Agassiz. But it is specially worthy of note that Pander seems to have been struck by the considerable resemblance which certain bones of the head of Chetrolepis bore to those shown in Quenstedt’s drawing of the head of Paleoniscus islebiensis in the ‘ Handbuch der Petrefactenkunde.’ The question of the systematic position of Chedrolepis was next discussed by Prof. Huxley*. Unfortunately, the material at his disposal at the time he wrote did not afford him the pipnty of making much advance on what had been already done by Pander, though assuredly he was on the right track. He accepted the institution by Pander of a distinct family of Chetrolepin’; and as regards the suborder in which this family should be included, he considered that it ought “ perhaps to be regarded as the earliest known form of the great suborder of Lepidosteidex.’’ The single short dorsal fin, the absence of jugular plates, and the non-lobate character of the paired fins were points justly considered by Prof. Huxley as excluding Chetrolepis from the Crosso- pterygide. In 1867, however, Mr. Powrie published a paper T in which he questioned the accuracy of the data on which Prof. Huxley’s opinions were founded. Chetrolepis, Mr. Powrie affirmed, does possess two large principal jugular plates ; and the struc- tures described by Agassiz as branchiostegal rays, but not seen by Pander or Huxley, “ correspond to the lateral jugular plates not uncommon in Ganoid fishes.” Although in this paper Mr. Powrie thinks that Prof. Huxley’s objections to Cheirolepis being a Crossopterygian are so far negatived, he nevertheless does not positively indicate the systematic posi- tion in which he thinks it ought to be placed. In Dr. Liitken’s essay on the Classification and Limits of the Ganoids}, Cheirolepis is placed, somewhat hesitatingly, among the Lepidosteids, Mr. Powrie’s jugular plates proving to him rather a stumbling-block. In the English abstract of this elaborate paper, Dr. Liitken states the absence of jugular sre to be one of the characteristics of the group of Lepi- osteidee, “with the sole exception of Chedrolepis, the only Devonian fish of the whole series which indicates by its gular plates a certain relationship to the contemporaneous Polypteride ’§. Again, in the full German edition published * Dec. Geol. Survey, x. (1861) pp. 38-40. + Geol. Magazine, iv. 1867, pp. 147-152. { Vidensk. Meddelelser nat. For. Kjébenhavn, 1868. § Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. 4th ser. vii. p. 331. L7* 240 Dr. R. H. Traquair on the Structure in 1873, he says:—‘ The position of this genus is somewhat doubtful ; the fulcral armature of all the fins seems to show that its place is here as the oldest member of the Lepidosteid series ; but its gular plates, which Powrie has pointed out, indicate possibly a certain relationship with—descent from (?) —the Devonian Polypterini”’*. My own observations have been made on a large number of examples of the well-known species Ch. Cummingia, Agass., from Cromarty, Lethen Bar, and Tynet Burn. Besides the specimens in the Edinburgh Museum of Science and Art, most of which form part of the Hugh-Miller collection, L have carefully gone over the “ea of Cherrolepis in the British Museum and in the Museum of Practical Geology, Jermyn Street; and I am also specially indebted to the Earl of Enniskillen for having, with great kindness, lent me a number of excellent specimens from his collection. The care- ful examination of these numerous specimens has enabled me, I think, to place the question of the systematic position of Cheirolepis on a more satisfactory footing than heretofore, though it is to be regretted that, on many points of detail, our knowledge of the cranial structure of this genus is still rather incomplete. The key to the whole subject is certainly a knowledge of the structure of Paleoniscus and its allies ; and had the writers who have previously treated of Chezrolepis been better ac- quainted with the structural details of that remarkable group of extinct fishes, the errors and doubts which have so long hung over its affinities would certainly not have prevailed so long as they have. The general form of the body, with its inequilobate, completely heterocercal tail, the number and shape of the fins, with their strongly fulcrated margins, are common characters, evident to every one without the assistance of the osteology of the head; only the small size, and appa- rently non-overlapping character, of the scales seemed for long to indicate that its place was with the Acanthodide. The scales of Chetrolepis, however, are well known to be arranged in very distinct oblique rows or bands, following the same general direction from above downwards and backwards as in rhombiferous Ganoids generally, and meeting in acute angles along the dorsal and ventral mesial lines. On the continua- tion of the body-axis along the upper lobe of the caudal fin, however, the direction of these bands is suddenly changed to * Dunker und Zittel’s ‘ Paleeontographica, xxii. erste Lieferung, 1873, p. 25, note. and Systematic Position of Cheirolepis. 241 one from above downwards and forwards—exactly the oppo- site; and this change takes place nearly opposite the middle of the origin of the lower lobe of the caudal, Though this fact is not alluded to by Pander in his description, it is most distinctly represented in tab. ix. fig. 1 of bis illustrations. On examining the tail of Palwoniscus, Amblypterus, or any allied genera, precisely the same phenomenon is invariably seen to occur—viz. the sudden alteration of the direction of the oblique bands of scales on the upper caudal lobe to one at right angles to that of the bands covering the rest of the body*. In Cheirolepis, too, as in these genera, the scales clothing the sides of this caudal body-prolongation become acutely lozenge-shaped as we trace them on towards the tip of the tail. I have not observed in front of the azygos fins the peculiar large scales which in most Paleeoniscid precede the dorsal, anal, and lower lobe of the caudal, ultimately passing into the fulera of these fins; but on the upper margin of the tail the arrangement of large V-scales is characteristic, and entirely in accordance with that in the heterocercal Lepi- dosteids and also in Acipenser and Polyodon. These have been so well illustrated in one of Prof. M‘Coy’s figuresT that there is no necessity for describing them further in this place ; enough has been said to show how strikingly Chetrolepis deviates from the Acanthodide in all points connected with the scales save their minute size, and how close, on the other hand, is the approach which it makes to Paleoniscus in the general arrangement of these appendages. And even as regards the smallness of the scales, it is to some extent kept in countenance by the undoubtedly Paleoniscoid Myriolepis Clarkei, Egerton, so far as we can judge from the beautiful figure given by its eminent describerf. The fins of Chetrolepis are composed of very numerous rays frequently dichotomizing, and divided transversely by very numerous articulations; the rays are very closely set, and the demi-rays of each side imbricate over each other from before backwards, like those of the anal fin of Polypterus, while conspicuous fulcral scales serrate their anterior margins. The arrangement here is in all essential respects identical with * It is an interesting fact that the patch of rhombic scales on the side of the vertebral prolongation in the tail of Acipenser and of Polyodon (in the latter genus the only scales, along with the “fulcra” above them, which occur on the body at all) correspond exactly in arrangement with this peculiarly arranged caudal patch of scales in the Paleoniscide. A similar arrangement is also traceable in the imperfectly heterocercal tail of Lepidosteus. ¥ ‘ Paleozoic Fossils,’ pl. 2 p. fig. 3. t Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. xx. 1863, pl. i. fig. 1. 242 Dr. R. H. Traquair on the Structure that in the Paleoniscide; but the minute articles of the rays are finer and more scale-like, and, as M‘Coy has aptly expressed it, present “a deceptive resemblance to the scales of the body.’”’ This view of the structure of the fins of Chez- rolepis, however, is denied by Pander, who affirms that the apparent joints of the fin-rays are in reality nothing but scales which covered internal rays apparently of a flexible nature; and such internal non-Abinted rays he has actually represented in tab. ix. fig. 2 of his work. Here I feel my- self compelled to dissent from the opinion of so high an authority as Pander, and to agree with Agassiz and M‘Coy— as, in spite of the most careful examination of a large number of specimens from various localities, I have never seen an thing like the unarticulated rays represented in his figure, and, moreover, a transverse section of a small portion of the lower lobe of the caudal, from a Cromarty nodule (Pl. X VIL. fig. 6), effectually (to my eyes at least) demonstrates the contrary. Here the whole thickness of the fin is seen to consist of the right and left sets of imbricating demi-rays, no other hard parts being visible. And although it is of course not im- possible that such internal soft rays may have been present, yet the structure as here shown exhibits the most complete analogy, or rather identity, with that of the anal fin in Poly- pterus and Calamoichthys, in which certainly no other rays exist save those whose ganoid, closely jointed, and imbricating surfaces are seen on the outside*. The shoulder-girdle must next claim our special attention, seeing that one of its elements seems to have escaped the observation of previous writers, save Powrie, and to have been by him completely misinterpreted. Of this the first element, by which the arch was attached to the skull, is the jirst supraclavicular, or “ suprascapular” (Pl. XVII. fig. 3, 1st s.cl), a small rounded-triangular plate placed immediately behind the posterior margin of the cranial shield, and distinctly seen only in very few specimens. It is correctly indicated by Pander, in tab. ix. fig. 6 of his work, by the number 46. Articulated with this is the second supraclavicular (2nd s.cl), or “ scapular,” a more elongated oe broadish above, but getting suddenly narrower about the middle, and whose long axis points obliquely downwards and backwards to articulate * Agassiz was nevertheless inclined to believe that in some species of Paleoniscus (e, g. P. Blainvillei and P. Voltzii) the fin-rays were really covered with scales (Poiss. Foss. t. ii. pt. 1, p, 43). I do not, however, find this idea corroborated by the specimens of Paleoniscus Blainvillet in the British Museum, se § I have carefully examined; P. Voltzit I have not seen, and Systematic Position of Cheirolepis. 243 with the clavicle. This bone is seen in Pander’s tab. viii. fig. 2 and tab. ix. figs. 3 & 5, but also marked 46, the same as the preceding *. Articulated with its lower extremity is the clavicle (figs. 2&3, cl), a bone so strong that it is con- spicuous in every nodule specimen, and seems to have been able to resist compression in very many cases where every thing else is crushed quite flat.. This clavicle is composed of two parts, set at a considerable angle to each other. Of these, the upper or vertical part, set on the side of the shoulder and forming part of the hinder margin of the branchial opening, is of a somewhat lanceolate shape, with the posterior margin more convex than the anterior, and with the apex directed obliquely upwards and backwards to the lower end of the bone last described. A nearly vertical line divides the outer surface of this part into two, the anterior of which looks rather forwards into the branchial cavity. The lower part of the bone, much smaller.and somewhat quadrate in form, projects inwards towards the ventral middle line; between the two arts, behind, is a notch from which the pectoral fin issued. his bone, the clavicle, is numbered 48 in Pander’s figures ; but in tab. ix. figs. 3 & 5 the number is placed on the element next to be described, which is not represented as distinct; and in tab. viii. fig. 2 it is also placed on a bone which is un- doubtedly the operculum. The last element of the shoulder- girdle articulated to the front of the lower end of the clavicle is the dnterclavicular plate (figs. 2 & 3, ¢.cl), a bone which among recent Ganoids is not found in Lepidosteus or Amia, though it occurs both in Polypterus and Aczpenser and also in Polyodon, and in them lies, as it does here, on the so-called “isthmus.” It consists of a pointed plate of bone, sharply bent on itself along a line continued forwards from the line of junction of the two portions of the clavicle, when the two bones are in apposition. It thus comes also to present two portions or aspects—the one looking upwards and outwards, forming part of the gill-slit below the branchiostegal rays, and the other covering the ventral surface of the isthmus. Seen from below, the ventral portion of the interclavicular plate is of a somewhat elongated triangular form, the apex directed forwards towards the symphysis of the jaw, the short posterior side articulating with the lower end of the clavicle, and in close apposition to its fellow of the opposite side, by about two thirds of its long internal margin, in specimens * There is probably an error in the lettering here, as the number 47, which Pander assigns to the “scapula,” does not occur on the plate at all. 244 Dr. R. H. Traquair on the Strueture where this relation has been left undisturbed *. These inter- clavieular plates are certainly the structures which have been figured ad. described by Powrie as “ principal jugulars”—a mistake into which he never could have fallen had he observed their relation to the clavicles, or had he taken into considera- tion the structure of the shoulder-girdle in the recent Polypterus or in the extinct Paloniscide. And in the presence and con- figuration of this, as of all the other elements of the shoulder- girdle, the closest resemblance is seen between Cheirolepis and the genera of fossil fishes allied to Palaoniscus, for corroboration of which the reader need only refer to m description of the same parts in Cycloptychius carbonarius}, and in Pygopterus (Nematoptychius) Greenockit and Amblypterus punctatus. Passing now to the bones of the face, we find the most singular conformity to the general type of structure in Paleo- niscus and its allies—a fact which, as already mentioned, did not altogether escape the notice of Pander. In the first place, the gape is very wide, the direction of the axis of the suspen- sorium and of the opereular apparatus passing obliquely down- wards and backwards, so as to carry the articulation of the lower jaw far enough behind. The superior maxillary bone (Pl. XVII. figs. 1&7, mx) has been very correctly figured by Pander, and is formed on the same type as in all the Palao- niscide. It consists of a plate of bone, broad behind the eye, and there covering a large part of the cheek; but immediately behind the orbital ring the superior margin becomes suddenly cut out, so that the anterior extremity passes forwards below the orbit, tapering to a point towards the premaxillary region. The inferior or dental margin is not quite straight, but shows a slight sigmoid curve ; the posterior inferior angle is rounded, while the short posterior margin, sloping obliquely upwards and forwards, joins the straight part of the superior margin at a very obtuse angle. Closely articulated to the maxilla is a rather narrow plate (fig. 7, x), consisting of two parts diverging at an obtuse angle. ‘The upper and anterior of these lies along the superior margin of the maxilla behind the orbit, the lower and posterior one passing down for some distance along the oblique posterior margin of the same bone, between it and the suboperculum, the centre of ossification * Though in the specimen represented in Plate XVII. fig. 2 the inter- clavicles have been forced apart, their juxtaposition is beautifully shown in No. 41725 of the British-Museum collection, and many others which I have seen. They are also in contact with each other in Mr, Powrie’s firure ; but there both are also disjoined from their respective clavicles. + Geol. Magazine, 2nd series, vol. i. June 1874. t Trans. Royal Soc. Edinburgh, 1867, xxiv. pp. 707, 708. In this paper I called the interclavicular precoracoid. and Systematic Position of Cheirolepis. 245 being placed near the angle of divergence. ‘This plate is aisknd xin Pander’s figures, and seems to correspond to a similar though somewhat smaller one seen in most Paleo- niscide, and which in Quenstedt’s previously quoted figure of the head of Palwoniscus islebiensis is marked as “ praoper- culum.” How far it represents a preoperculum is doubtful, though it certainly does occupy a very analogous position to that of the great preopercular cheek-plate in Polypterus. Above the margin of the anterior limb of this plate is fre- quently seen another portion of bone (fig. 7, ), the interpre- tation of which does not seem very clear, but which may very possibly be a portion of the hyomandibular exposed from under the previously described plate. The lower jaw, long and powerful in accordance with the great backward extent of the gape, was undoubtedly the strongest of all the bony parts of the head, as its contour, like that of the clavicle, is easily recognizable in most specimens. Its dentary portion (figs. 1 & 7,d) has been well figured by Pander, and is pecu- liar in presenting on its lower margin a wide shallow notch rather in front of its middle, and immediately above which the centre of ossification was placed. Besides the dentary portion, distinct articular and angular elements (fig. 7, ag) are recognizable; but I have never succeeded in detecting any inner or splenial plate, though I have often seen it in many Carboniferous Palzoniscide. The operculum (fig. 7, op) seems to have been a very delicate plate, as it is only in very few specimens that any trace of it is seen. However, it is unmistakably shown in one of Lord Enniskillen’s specimens, and in Nos. 255 and 435 of the Hugh-Miller collection ; and though Pander states that he was unable to detect it, yet the plate marked 48 in his tab. vii. fig. 2, as an element of the shoulder-girdle, clearly corresponds with it both in form and position. It is a narrow, elongated, thin plate, with acute anterior-superior and posterior-inferior angles, and placed obliquely on the side of the head, between the suspensorium and the shoulder-girdle. The suboperculum (s.op) is also rarely shown, and I have come across no specimen in which the whole of its contour is distinctly exhibited; to judge, however, from its remains, it seems to have been a somewhat square-shaped plate, placed immediately below the inferior margin of the operculum. This is undoubtedly the plate marked 3 in Mr. Powrie’s figures, and which he supposes “‘ may have represented the operculum.” The branchiostegal rays, described and figured by Agassiz, were not observed by Pander nor by Prof. Huxley, though he accepts and quotes Agassiz’s statement regarding them. 246 Dr. R. H. Traquair on the Structure They were figured and described by Powrie, who considered them, however, to be “lateral jugular plates’’—an opinion which, I think, he would scarcely have advocated save as a corollary to his view that the interclavicular plates were “principal” jugulars. The branchiostegal rays are beautifully displayed in a specimen in Lord Enniskillen’s collection (Pl. XVII. fig. 1), in no. 41725 of the British-Museum col- lection, and also in nos. 134 and 360 of the Hugh-Miller col- lection. ‘Twelve of them are counted below each mandibular ramus in Lord Enniskillen’s specimen, though there may have been more; and of these the anterior one on each side is large, broad, and somewhat triangular in shape, the rest being long and narrow. In a specimen of Amblypterus punc- tatus, Agass., from Wardie, now before me, and of which I have given a diagrammatic sketch in a paper already quoted, exactly the same arrangement of branchiostegal rays or plates is seen, with this exception—that between the two large an- terior ones a lozenge-shaped azygos one is placed immediately behind the symphysis of the jaw; but of this I have never seen any very clear evidence in Chetrolepis. There is very distinct evidence in Cheirolepis of a circle of plates surrounding the orbit, as in Palwoniscus, but concerning which it is impossible to furnish any more special details ; Pander indeed mentions the arrangement as being formed by one large perforated plate. Specimen no. 41310 of the British-Museum collection shows that the top of the head was traversed longitudinally by a pair of slime-canals following a flexuous course, similar to those in Paleoniscus; but I have never seen any specimen showing the individual bones of the cranial roof so well as to enable one to make a satisfactory figure of them. What I have been able to observe confirms Pander’s statement as to the two parietals, followed by a pair of more elongated frontals. External to these there seem to lie on each side two plates, the posterior of which would seem to represent the squamous plate seen outside the parietal in Lepidosteus and Amia, while the anterior may correspond to the postfrontal scale-bone seen in the last-mentioned fish. These have nothing to do with the three bones mentioned by Pander as occupying a similar position, and marked 46, # and y, in his figures, which, as he himself surmises, undoubtedly belong to the shoulder- girdle and face. The snout seems to have been rounded and blunt; but no specimen which I have seen has revealed any thing describable regarding the bones of the nasal region, in- cluding the premaxilla, The same must unfortunately be also said of the side walls and base of the skull, of the and Systematic Position of Cheirolepis. 247 palato-quadrate apparatus, and of the hyoid and branchial arches. Regarding the dentition of Chetrolepis there has also pre- vailed some little obscurity. Agassiz describes the teeth as being indeed of two sizes, but all arranged in one line, and in that respect differing from the unequal dentition of his “ Sauroids” and “Ccelacanths,” in which the smaller teeth form a continuous external range. Pander and Huxley describe: the jaws as being set with small conical teeth, but they were unable to find any of the larger ones referred to by Agassiz ; while Powrie, on the other hand, returns to the statement of Agassiz regarding the larger and smaller teeth being in one row. According to the specimens which have come under my own observation, the jaws of Checrolepis were set along the inner aspect of their dental margins with one row of tolerably equal and rather closely set, sharp, and acutely conical teeth, each having a marked inward curve, and, when broken, displaying a large simple internal pulp-cavity. These are undoubtedly the teeth referred to and figured by Pander, who, however, seemed to expect that, according to Agassiz’s description, larger ones would be found among them. Now, other teeth of a different size do exist—not larger, however, but smaller; and these form a row external to those first described. ‘The outer row of smaller teeth, the discovery of which at once breaks down Agassiz’s demarcation between the dentition of Checrolepis and that of his so-called “ Sauroids ”’ and “Ceelacanths,” 1s not often seen, from the fact that the edge of the jaw on which they are placed is almost invariably found split off and adherent to the matrix of the “ counter- part,” and thus the little teeth in question are hidden. But by careful working out with the point of aneedle, I have been able to display some of them in two cases where a portion of the edge of the jaw remained, as shown in Plate XVII. figs. 4 and 5. They are indeed very minute, being only about one third or one fourth the length of the larger ones, which them- selves only measure =}; inch in specimens of the ordinary size. The dentition of Chetrolepis is thus reduced to a type very frequent in Ganoid fishes, and which notably occurs in many, if not in most, of the genera comprised in the family of Paloniscide. The facts adduced in the preceding pages seem most satis- factorily to prove not only that Chezrolepis, as Prof. Huxley has already indicated, must take its place among those Ganoids which he has brought together under his suborder of Lepi- dosteide, but also that among those Lepidosteids it must 248 On the Systematic Position of Cheirolepis. be classed along with Paleoniscus, Pygopterus, Oxygnathus, Cycloptychius, and other genera which constitute the long- extinct family of Paleoniscide. So close indeed is the corre- spondence between the general organization of Chetrolepis and ot Paleoniscus, that at most only the distinction of a separate *subtamily ” can be accorded to it, in virtue of the peculiarity of its scales. Though the precursor of a numerous tribe of ‘most interesting fishes in the Carboniferous and Permian eras, and which finally disappear with the Lias, Chezrolepis stands alone in the Devonian fauna, so far as that has been as yet revealed to us*; and no peculiarity of its structure throws the smallest additional light on the evolution of the group to which it belongs; for the absolute divergence in all other points of structure utterly excludes the idea that its minute scales betray any special affinity to the Acanthodians, while the correct determination of the plates, which have been mistaken for jugulars, equally forbids any association of it with the “contemporaneous Polypteride.” EXPLANATION OF PLATE XVII. Fig. 1. Represents the mandibles and branchiostegal rays of both sides oF Cheirolepis Cummingia, also the right maxilla and part of the circumocular ring. From a specimen from Lethen Bar, in the collection of the Earl of Enniskillen. . Both interclavicular bones, with the left clavicle and the lower extremity of the right clavicle. From a specimen from Cro- marty in the Hugh-Miller collection, Edinburgh Museum of Science and Art. Fig. 3, Outline of the shoulder-girdle and its component bones, restored. Fig. 4. A small portion of the edge of the superior maxillary bone, mag- nified two diameters. The outer row of small teeth is exhibited, also one of the larger ones and the broken stump of another. Hugh-Miller collection. Fig. 5. Portion of the dentary bone of the mandible of another specimen. Along one half of the bone the outermost edge has been broken away, thus carrying off the small ones and exhibiting the inner row of larger teeth; along the other half this edge remains, and shows some of the small teeth, while the continua- tion of the row of large ones is concealed by the matrix. The working-out of the small teeth has not been so successful here as in the preceding specimen. Fig. 6. Vertical transverse section of a small portion of the lower lobe of the caudal fin, magnified two diameters, Fig. 7. Restored outlines of some of the bones of the side of the head. The radiating lines on some of the bones are those which, on bo Wg. * With the apparent ee Se of four species of Acrolepis, described by Eichwald from the “Old Red” of Russia (‘Lethea Rossiea,’ vol. i. pp. 1678-1581). On a new Species of Liphistius. 249 their under surfaces, are seen passing from their centres of ossi- fication. In all these figures the same letters apply to the same bones. mx, maxilla; mn, mandible ; d,dentary ; ag, angular; sw.o, sub- orbital; z, cheek-plate above the maxilla; y, portion of hyo- mandibular (?); op, operculum; s.op, suboperculum; br, branchio- stegal plates or rays ; Ist s.cl, first supraclavicular ; 2nd s.c/, second supraclavicular ; cl, clavicle ; 7.c/, interclavicular. XXXI.—On a new Species of Liphistius (Schiidte). By the Rev. O. P. CampripGe, M.A., C.M.Z.S. Tue British-Museum collection contains a fine specimen of this remarkable genus from Penang, the same locality whence the typical species L. desultor, Schiédte*, was obtained. In almost every essential particular the British-Museum example agrees with L. desultor, except in being larger and possessing four mammillary organs of considerable size beneath the + abdomen, immediately behind the second pair of ‘spiracular apertures. Prof. Schiédte makes no mention of such organs, describing ZL. desultor as “mammillis textoriis nullis.” Whether the organs in the British-Museum specimen are, or not, true spinning-organs seems doubtful, inasmuch as an examination lately made under a microscope by Mr. A. G. Butler has failed to reveal any spinning-tubes. It is not without some reluctance that I have determined to characterize the example in the British Museum as a new species. It appeared to me possible that the mammillary organs might have been overlooked or destroyed in the speci- men from which Prof. Schiédte described Liphistius desultor ; I am, however, compelled to shut out the idea of this possi- bility, after receiving a communication on the subject (through Dr. Thorell) from Prof. Schiédte. From this communication it appears that when the specimen came into Prof. Schiédte’s hands it was in a dry state, having been opened along the middle line of the underside of the abdomen and, after ex- traction of the contents, stuffed with cotton; it was then placed in spirit of wine. Prof. Schiddte thinks it almost im- possible for the collector (Dr. Teylingen, himself a good zoolo- gist) to have overlooked or destroyed the mammille, if they had been present; the incision through the abdomen had the appearance of being exceedingly clean and even; and the surface showed no loss whatever of substance. Under these * Vide ois and figures of Liphistius desultor, in Kroyer’s ‘Natur- hist, Tidsskr. N. R.’ Bd. ii. 1849, pp. 617-624, tab. 4. . 250 On a new Species of Liphistius. circumstances, the conclusion seems inevitable that the ex- ample possessing the four mammillary organs (and these placed in so abnormal a position), whatever may be their true nature and office, must be of a different species from that described by Prof. Schiédte. I therefore propose to call the British-Museum example Liphistius mammillanus, and briefly to characterize it as follows :— Liphistius mammillanus, n. sp. Adult female, length 20 lines =42 millims. Abdomen similar in colour to that of L. desultor (Schiédte), and its upperside similarly covered by a longitudinal series of transverse articulated corneous plates. The spiracular plates are four in number, grouped aloachy together beneath the fore extremity of the abdomen (fig. 1,544); and immediately behind them are four mammillary organs, placed two and two, as represented (fig. 1,aaaa); the two foremost are much larger than the two hinder ones, of a curved subconical or rather tapering form, composed of several (about twelve) arti- culations or rings, of which the basal one is much the largest ; the two hinder organs are somewhat similar in form, though much smaller, and the basal annulation is not nearly so broad Fig. 1. Fig. 2. Fig. 3. Ys yan Ve ad Fig. 1. Underside of abdomen: a aaa, mammillary organs; bb bb, spi- racular plates ; c, anal tubercle and orifice. Fig. 2. a, sternum; b,labium. Fig. 3. One of the falces. in proportion ; the several annulations are fringed with short hairs on their posterior edges. These organs are capable of vertical, but not horizontal movement. The anal aperture seems to be in rather a different position from that represented in Prof. Schiddte’s plate (fig. 7), where it occupies the posterior extremity of the abdomen, while in the present spider it is tee considerably beneath it (fig. 1, c). The sternum (fig. 2, a) differs a little in form from that of Liphistius desultor ; while the eyes appear to be similar both On the Geographical Distribution of Fishes. 251 in their relative size and position. The labium, however, though similar in form, is distinctly broader than the fore extremity of the sternum (fig. 2,6); while in L. desultor it is represented in figure 5 of Schiddte’s plate as narrower. A single example of the adult female in the British Museum. Hab. Penang. Naturalists and collectors in Penang should endeavour to find other examples of this genus, of which all our knowledge at present is based upon the two specimens mentioned above. Besides the interest attaching to the presence or absence of spinners, they are the only spiders, as yet discovered, whose abdomen is protected by articulated corneous transverse plates, similar to those found in the orders Scorpionidea and Thely- phonidea. XXXII.—On the Geographical Distribution of Fishes. By Tueopore Gi, M.D., Ph.D.* AxouT 9000 species of living teleosteous fishes are now known, variously distributed and found in greater or less numbers in almost all the waters of the globe, fresh and salt ; the greatest numbers of species, however, are found in the aie waters, and especially in the seas of the Indo-Moluccan archipelago. The distribution of the types, especially of the marine species, to a considerable degree coincides with ther- mometrical conditions. In the polar and northern temperate regions, for example, are found representatives of the families of Gadoids or codfishes, Lycodoids, Stichzeoids, Liparidoids, Cottoids or sculpins, and others less known. In the tropical regions many forms are distributed throughout the entire zone (and therefore designated as tropicopolitan), this being espe- cially the case with many genera of Labroids, Scaroids or parrot-fishes, Pomacentroids, Gerreoids, Serranoids or groupers, Sparoids, Carangoids, and others—numerous species of these families being found in torrid waters, while very few extend far northward or southward. In the antarctic regions, again, we have another combination of forms: typical codfishes and the other types characteristic of high northern latitudes are wanting, but are severally replaced by peculiar groups, which seem to fill an analogous Hae in the economy of nature, having a superficial resemblance in general aspect, although they are not at all (comparatively speaking) related in structure. * Reprinted, with additions by the Author, from advance sheets of ‘ Johnson’s New Universal Cyclopedia.’ 252 Dr. T. Gill on the Geographical The Gadoids, for example, are replaced by Notothenioids, the Lycodoids by peculiar genera, the Cottoids by Harpagiferoids, &c. In the contrast between these antarctic AE 5 e arctic forms we have evidence of the absence of any paramount causal relation between temperature and structure; and, in addition to the “ tropicopolitan” types, each great tropical region has a number of characteristic and peculiar types. But the distribution of the inhabitants of the great open seas and of those of the inland waters are determined by hifferent conditions, as might & prior? be supposed. While, for ex- ample, the inhabitants of the opposite sides of converging continents are to a great extent similar, the freshwater species of those continents are mostly quite dissimilar, and become more and more so as we progress southward. There are numerous families of fishes which are represented in the fresh waters—some exclusively so, others with marine species. The geographical limitations and relations in space of these families may be exhibited under combinations in several categories*, viz. :— 1. Peculiar to North America—Percide (Etheostomine), Centrarchidew, Aphredoderide, Amblyopside, Percopside, Hyodontide, Amide, and Lepidosteide. 2. Peculiar to Tropical Asia—Platypteride, Helostomide, Osphromenide, Nandide, Luciocephalide, Ophiocephalide, Notopteride, Salangide, Homalopteride, and Sisoride. 3. Peculiarto Africa—Kneriide, Mormyridz,Gymnarchide, and Polypteride. 4, Peculiar to tropical America—Centropomide, Polycen- tride, Sternopygide, Electrophoride, Hypophthalmide, Tri- chomycteride, Callichthyide, Argiide, Loricariide, and As- predinide. 5. Peculiar to Australia—Gadopside, Ceratodontide. 6. Peculiar and common to the cistropical hemisphere (that is, Northern America, Europe, and Northern Asia)—Gadide (Lotine), Cottidee (Uranidee), Percidee (Percine), Gasteros- teide (Gasterosteine), Esocide, Umbride, Catastomide (America and Eastern Asia), Salmonide, Acipenseride, and Polyodontide (America and Eastern Asia). 7. Peculiar and common to Europe and Asia—Cobitide. * As mgr naturally be supposed, the forms assigned to the categories enumerated are not always rigidly limited to the specific regions when contiguous regions are contiguous: thus the Cichlids send representa- tives into the regions of Asia near Egypt, and the Lepidosteide have a representative as far southward as Panama. In the latter case, indeed, the question might even arise whether the Lepidosteide might not rather be immigrants into North America than the reverse; but a recourse to paleontology solves the question. Distribution of Fishes. 253 8. Peculiar and common to South America and Anstralia— Percophididx, Haplochitonide, Galaxiide, and Osteoglosside. 9. Peculiar and common to tropical and subtropical America and Africa—Cichlide, Characinide, and Lepidosirenide. In addition to these, the family Cyprinide is represented in the entire cistropical or “ arctogeean ’”’ hemisphere as well as in tropical Africa and Asia; and there are several monotypic families limited to very small regions, such as the Comepho- ride, the single species of which is only known from Lake Baikal. ‘There are, further, a number of families (in addition to several already mentioned) which are chiefly represented by marine species, but which have also a greater or less number of representatives in fresh water in different regions of the earth; such are the Brotulide, Blenniide, Gobiide, Scieenide, Atherinide, Mugilide, Cyprinodontide, Microsto- mide, Clupeide, Dorosomide, &c. Others, again, were represented in former epochs in parts of the world where they are not now found; and especially to be noted among these are two families at present characteristic in their distribution: the first of these is the Cobitide, which in the early Tertiary were inhabitants of Western America, and which thus increased the similarity of the fauna of our (cistropical) continent to that of Northern Asia; the second is the Ceratodontide, a family whose representatives have long been known from fossil teeth found in Paleozoic and Mesozoic deposits (and which were referred by Prof. Agassiz to the sharks), and had been supposed to have expired towards the end of the Triassic epoch; yet recently (since 1870) two species, closely allied to those found in the Triassic beds of Europe, have been discovered living in Australia; and thus another ancient type has been preserved in that continent to illustrate the past life of our own hemisphere. If we now seek to apply the knowledge thus gained to the appreciation of the origin of the different fish-faunas of the globe, we are forced to the following conclusions. Inasmuch as the cistropical hemisphere shares in common the same families, and to a considerable extent the same genera (and even some species), it is presumable that the dif- ferent regions of that hemisphere have derived their inhabitants from a common primitive source, although North America has quite a large proportion of forms peculiar to it. ‘The relation of these odilie, forms, however, are in all cases rather with some found in the northern hemisphere (freshwater or marine) than with any found elsewhere ; but, at the same time, towards the south-western limits of the United States occur repre- sentatives of families which are characteristic of tropical Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Ser. 4. Vol. xv. 18 254 On the Geographical Distribution of Fishes. America. Further, it is to be remarked that several of those forms whose living representatives are most characteristic and peculiar to North America, e.g. Amiide and Lepidosteide, were in previous geological epochs represented by species in Europe; while the Cobitide, now unrepresented by living American species, had, as already remarked, examples in more ancient times in that continent. Tropical Asia nourishes a great number of peculiar forms ; but the relations of those are intimate either with cistropical ones or with marine types. Africa hes Cyprinoids and Anabantids in common with tropical Asia, and Cyprinoids in common with the cistro- pical hemisphere; but it also supports several very peculiar families for whose relations we have to seek in other con- tinents. In tropical America are to be found the nearest relations of some of these African types, and several almost or quite limited to those two continents. On the other hand, in South America are found several families having no analogues in the parts of the world yet mentioned, but for which we have to turn our eyes to Australia; and there we have representa- tives of not only the same families, but even, it has been con- tended, one of the same species. Under these circumstances we are almost compelled to believe that the fish-fauna of South America was derived, at a distant epoch, to some ex- tent from a common source with that of Africa and that of Australasia. We have, however, at first sight, contrary in- dications; but they are not irreconcilable: the most conspicuous and, as it were, obtrusive types of South-American fishes are analogues of African forms, members of the families Cichlidee and Characinide; but the species belong to widely different genera. On the other baad although the types common to South America and Australia are not conspicuous in numbers or economical importance, they are much more nearly related to corresponding Australian species than the former, and, in common with other facts, tend to verify Huxley’s views respecting an “ Austro-Columbian ” fauna. In fine, dividing the earth into regions distinguished by general ichthyological peculiarities, several primary combina- tions may be recognized, viz.:—1, an Arctogean, embracing Europe, Northern Asia, and Northern America ; 2, an Asiatic, embracing the tropical portions of the continent; 3, an Afri- can, limited to the region south and east of the Desert; 4, an American (embracing the America par excellence dedicated to Amerigo Vespucci), including the tropical and transtropical portions ; and, 5, an Australasian. Further, of these (a) the On an undescribed Organ in Limulus. 255 first two have intimate relations to each other, and (4) the last three others among themselves; and some weighty arguments may be adduced to support a division of the faunas of the globe into two primary regions coinciding with the two com- binations alluded to—(a) a CmnoG#A and (4) an Eoama, which might represent areas of derivation or gain from more or less distant geological epochs. In connexion with the geographical distribution of fishes there are a couple of empirical facts which are also specially noteworthy. In the order of Teleocephali the Acanthoptery- gian types are vastly preponderant in the tropical and sub- tropical waters, while the jugular Malacopterygian types (e. g. Lycodide, Gadide, &c.) form a large proportion thereof in the polar regions. Further, and it is in the same direction, in Acanthopterygian types the vertebrae are actually or ap- proximately 24, divided between 10 abdominal and 14 caudal, in the great majority of the tropical saltwater species; while in the cold-water forms (arctic and antarctic) the number is considerably increased. There are many exceptions to this generalization so far as the tropical forms are concerned ; but the tendency in the direction in question is so decided, that while in the warm-water forms of the typical Scor- penine (Sebastosomus, Scorpena, &e.) the vertebree are 24 (A. 10 +C. 14), in the representatives which are peculiar to the high north (Sebastes norvegicus and S. viviparus) the ver- tebre are increased in number to 31 (A.12+C.19). There is, however, no apparent physiological or morphological corre- lation between these and other facts, and we have in them perhaps nothing more than interesting cases of irrelative coincidence. XXXIT.—On an undescribed Organ in Limulus, supposed to be Renal in its Nature. By A. S. Packarp, Jun.* In dissecting the king crab one’s attention is directed to a large and apparently important gland, conspicuous from its bright red colour contrasting with the dark masses of the liver and the yellowish ovary or greenish testes, and present- ing the same appearance in either sex. The glands are bilaterally symmetrical, one situated on each side of the stomach and beginning of the intestine, and each entirely * From an advance sheet of the ‘ American Naturalist,’ communicated yy the Author, having been read at the Philadelphia Meeting of the ational Academy of Sciences, held in November 1874. 18* ho 56 Dr. A. S. Packard on an separate from its fellow. One of these glands consists of a stolon-like mass, running along close to the great collective vein, and attached to it by wregular bands of connective tissue, which also holds the gland in place. From this hori- zontal mass four vertical branches arise, and lie between and next to the partitions at the base of the legs, dividing the sides of the body into compartments. The posterior of these four vertical lobes accompanies the middle hepatic vein from its origin from the great collective vein, and is sent off oppo- site the insertion of the fifth pair of feet. Halfway between the origin of the vein and the articulation of the foot to the body it turns at aright angle, the ends of the two other lobes passing a little beyond it, and ends in a blind sac, less vertical than the others, slightly ascending at the end, which lies just above the insertion of the second pair of feet. The two middle lobes are directed to the collective vein. Each lobe is flattened out somewhat, and lies close to the posterior wall of the com- partment in which it is situated, as if wedged in between the wall and the muscles between it and the anterior portion of the compartment. Each lobe also accompanies the bases of the first four tegumentary nerves. I could not make out any general opening* into the cavity of the body by injection of the gland, or any connexion with the hepatic or great collec- tive vein, all attempts to inject the gland from the veins failing. ‘The four lobes certainly end in blind sacs. The lobes are irregular in form, appearing as if twisted and knotted, and with sheets and bands of connective tissue form- ing the sheaths of the muscles among which the gland lies. Each lobe, when cut across, is oval, with a yellowish interior and a small central cavity, forming evidently an excretory duct. The gland externally is of a bright brick-red. The glandular mass is quite dense, though yielding. It is singular that this conspicuous gland, though it must have engaged their attention, has not been noticed by Van der Hoeven, Civil or A. Milne-Edwards in their accounts of dissections of this animal. When examined under a Hartnack’s no. 9 immersion-lens and Zentmayer’s B eyepiece, the reddish external cortical portion consists of closely aggregated irregularly rounded nucleated cells of quite unequal size ; and scattered about in the interstices between the cells are dark reddish masses which give colour to the gland. They are very irregular in size and * Leydig (‘ Naturgeschichte der Daphniden’) states that several ana- tomists, after laborious attempts, have failed to find the opening to the green gland in any crustacean, undescribed Organ in Limulus. 257 form, and, twenty hours after the portion of the parenchyma submitted to microscopic examination, vibrated to and fro. I am reminded in the vibrating movements of these bodies of Siebold’s description (‘Anatomy of the Invertebrates’) of similar bodies in the renal organs of the Lamellibranchs, ¢.e. the gland of Bojanus. He says in a footnote, p. 214 (Burnett’s translation) :—‘“ If the walls of these organs are prepared in any way for microscopic examination, a part of their parenchyma separates into a vesiculo-granular mass, the Sarticles of which have a very lively dancing motion. ‘The motions are due to portions of ciliated epithelium adhering to the cells and seseailee In other portions of the outer reddish part of the gland, where the pigment(?) masses are wanting, the mass is made up of fine granular cells, not nucleated. Other cells have a large nucleus filled with granules and containing nucleoli. n the yellowish or, as we may for convenience call it, the medullary portion are scattered about very sparingly what are probably the round secreting cells. The nucleus is very large and amber-coloured, with a clear nucleolus; others have no nucleolus ; and the small ones are colourless. I am at a loss to think what this gland, with its active secreting cells filled with a yellowish fluid, can be, unless it is renal in its nature. This view is borne out by the fact of its relation with the hepatic and great collective vein. If future examination shows some outlet into the venous circu- lation, then its renal nature would seem most probable. No other organ that can be renal in its nature exists in Limulus. In its general position and relations it is probably homologous with the green gland of the Decapod Crustacea and its homo- logue in the lower orders of Crustacea, which is supposed also to be renal in its nature. It may also possibly represent the organ of Bojanus in the Mollusca, which is said to be renal in its function. It perhaps represents the glandular portion of the segmental organs in worms. That so large and im- portant a gland is an embryonic gland, in adult lite aborted and disused, is not probable; nor is there any good reason for regarding it as analogous to the suprarenal capsule of the vertebrates, analogues of which are said by Leydig to exist in Paludina and Pontobdella. Reasoning from their histological structure and by exclu- sion, it seems not improbable that these glands are renal in their nature, and homologous with the green glands of the normal Crustacea. They seem also homologous with the organs described by M. A. Giard in the Rhizocephala, and 258 Dr. R. H. Traquair on Fossil Fishes said by him to be “situated on each side of the middle part of the animal, and generally coloured yellow or red (primitive kidneys?)” (Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. Nov. 1874, . 383). , I may add that all these observations were made on livin Limulus polyphemus, in the laboratory of the Anderson School of Natural History, at Penikese Island, Mass. XXXIV.—On some Fossil Fishes from the Neighbourhood of Edinburgh. By R. H. Traquair, M.D., F.G.8., Keeper of the Natural-History Collections in the Edinburgh Museum of Science and Art*. (Plate XVI.] I. Nematoptychius Greenockii, Agass., sp. E1GuT years ago I published a papert giving a detailed description of a fish from the Wardie Shales, which I con- sidered, and still do so, to be the Pygopterus Greenockit of Agassiz. Since that time remains of the same fish have turned up in many other localities near Edinburgh, showing that it enjoyed arange extending upwards into the true Coal- measures. Proceeding upwards from the Wardie Shales, it occurs in the horizon of the Burdiehouse Limestone, a speci- men in the British Museum (no. 45867) from Burntisland, in Fifeshire, displaying numerous scales and bones of this species, commingled with similar relics of Hurynotus crenatus. Nume- rous specimens also in the Edinburgh Museum of Science and Art, and in private collections, show its not uncommon pre- sence in the “ Edge-Coal” strata of Gilmerton and Loanhead, and in the Upper Coal-measures of Shawfair. With the ex- ception of a head, with the anterior part of the body, from Gil- merton, belonging to Mr. Somervail of Edinburgh, and an entire though badly preserved specimen from Woolmet, near Edmonston, in the Museum of Science and Art, all the speci- mens as yet procured from beds above the Wardie Shales are very fragmentary ; yet some of the fragments, from the softer nature of their matrix, afford us some details regarding the * Communicated by the Author, having been read before the Geolo- gical Society of Edinburgh, 4th February, 1875. + “Description of Pygopterus Greenockii, Agass., with Notes on the Structural Relations of the Genera Pygopterus, Amblypterus, and Eury- notus,” Trans. Royal Soc. Edinb, vol. xxiv. 1867, pp. 701-714, pl. xly. from the Neighbourhood of Edinburgh. 259 teeth and scales, which it is difficult to obtain from those pre- served in the refractory ironstone of the Wardie nodules. In his very brief notice of this fish* Agassiz stated that, though very distinct as a species, its generic relations were doubtful, mentioning as a reason that the scales were much higher than broad. Having, since my previous description was written, enjoyed better opportunities of studying the characters of the genus Pygopterus, I have found the conclusion inevit- able, that Agassiz’s doubts were so well founded that it be- comes absolutely necessary to erect a new genus for the fish under consideration. I propose, then, for it the generic title of Nematoptychius, in allusion to the fine thread-like striae with which the scales and many of the head-bones are ornamented. As regards the scales, these differ in a most marked manner from those of Pygopterus. In the latter genus they are regularly rhomboidal (Pl. XVI. fig. 6); and over the greater part of the body they are equilateral, those in the front of the flank only being rather higher than broad. The exposed rhombic surface has its acute angles pointing, as usual, up- wards and forwards, downwards and backwards ; the anterior- superior angle is produced into a prominent point covered by the adjoining scale ; while from the middle of the upper margin a special and well-marked articular peg or spine likewise rises, to be received into a corresponding depression on the under sur- face of the scale above. In fact Agassiz describes the scales of P. mandibularis as being very firmly articulated by means of “ deux cornes, qui existent au bord supérieur de l’écaille, et se logent sous la surface émaillée de l’écaille yoisine” +. These “deux cornes ” (the one a production of the anterior-superior angle of the scale, the other a special articular spine arising from its upper margin) are indeed, as every one knows, by no means specially characteristic of Pygopterus. In Nema- toptychius Facenatats however, the scale is of a very dit- ferent and, in truth, most peculiar form (Pl. XVI. figs. 9, 10,11). All along the back and flanks the scales are much higher than broad ; the exposed area is indeed more or less rhomboidal; but the acute angles are here the posterior- superior and the anterior-inferior. The anterior-superior angle is not produced into an articular point, distinct from the proper articular spine, which latter, broad and triangular, arises from the entire upper margin of the scale. The ex- posed ganoid surface is ornamented by very delicate thread- like, wavy, branching and anastomosing ridges, which, in the * Poissons Fossiles, t. ii. pt. 2, p. 78. + Ibid. p. 76. 260 Dr. R. H. Traquair on Fossil Fishes scales of the flank, are subparallel and run more or less verti- cally down the scale, or between the two acute angles (fig. 9) ; on the scales of the back, however, they often follow a more irregular and flexuously contorted course (fig. 11). The general contour of the fish, too, as shown in the figure illustrating my previous paper, differs considerably from that in Pygopterus. In such typical Pygoptert as P. mandibularis or P. Humboldtit, both dorsal and anal fins are placed much in front of the caudal; the dorsal is not particularly large for the size of the fish (in fact none of the fins are, save the caudal, which is truly tremendous) ; but the base of the anal is pecu- liarly extended backwards. On this latter peculiarity Agassiz devalts particularly in characterizing the genus ; for he says, “mais ce qui caractérise plus particulitrement les Pygopterus, c’est qu’a cette caudale inéquilobe se joint une anale fort longue qui garnit le bord inférieur du corps sur une grande étendue’’*, In Nematoptychius Greenockit, on the other hand, the dorsal and anal are considerably larger in proportion, and placed nearer the tail, and the anal fin may be said to be the exact counter- part of the nearly oppositely placed dorsal. Other fishes have indeed been named “* Pygopterus,” in which the peculiar cha- racter of the anal fin referred to is also absent, as, for example, in the very imperfectly known P. Bucklandi of the Burdie- house Limestone, of which Agassiz says that it is characterized by having its anal “ trés-rapprochée de la caudale tf. What- ever value, however, we may be inclined to place on the form and position of these fins in a more extended revision of the genus Pygopterus, the form of the scales alone is certainly abundantly sufiicient to distinguish Nematoptychius generically, not only from Pygopterus, but from all the other known genera of the family of Paleoniscidee. In my former communication the teeth were imperfectly de- scribed, it being very difficult to obtain satisfactory views of them in the Wardie specimens, owing to the hardness and peculiar nature of the ironstone in which they are enclosed. Specimens from Loanhead, however, preserved in soft bitumi- nous shale or in cannel coal, afford better opportunities for studying their configuration (Pl. XVI. fig. 8). They are acutely conical, round in transverse section, and more or less curved inwards. Their apices very distinctly display the well- known “enamel cap ”’ clearly marked off on the exterior of the * Poissons Fossiles, t. ii. pt. 2, p. 74. + 1b. p. 77. I cannot refrain from expressing very considerable doubts as to that species, or, in fact, any other of the so-called Carboniferous “ Pygopteri,” being really referable to that genus. Jrom the Neighbourhood of Edinburgh. 261 tooth, so as to present an appearance almost as if a little extin- guisher had been stuck on to the point. Below this, which is quite smooth, the polished surface is ornamented with fine striz, more marked in some specimens than in others, and which con- sist, in fact, of very delicate linear depressions, often interrupted and wavy. ‘These are best marked just below the enamel cap, and become lost towards the base of the tooth, which is dull and smooth. Microscopically the teeth display a structure quite similar to that described by Agassiz in Pygopterus, and by Messrs. Hancock and Atthey in Palwoniscus Egertont. The pulp-cavity is simple and wide at the base, becoming attenuated upwards into the body of the tooth; the dentine displays the same arrangement of radiating tubules, and is crowned above by acap of structureless “ enamel,” which also sends down a very thin and delicate layer over the whole ex- ternal surface. I formerly described the teeth as quite smooth ; and so they seemed to be in the specimen then at my disposal. The apparent absence of the striz in these Wardie specimens, however, is evidently due to flaking-off of the external enamel film above mentioned, the surface being at the same time left rather dull; and I have since seen specimens from that locality in which the external polished surface still remains, and which show the very same striz as those seen in specimens from other localities, preserved in a softer inatrix. The maxillary bone, represented in Pl. XVI. fig. 7, is from Shawfair, and, though undoubtedly belonging to the same species, is proportionally shorter and broader than is usually the case. Ihave another from Loanhead, which shows the same peculiarity. Neither of these belonged to full-grown fish, in which the maxillary often attains a length of 22 inches by 1 inch in breadth posteriorly. The teeth are of different sizes ; the larger ones, measuring in ordinary specimens from + to } inch in length, are arranged in a row at somewhat irregular intervals ; and occupying a more external position on the edge of the jaw is a line of smaller teeth, whose length varies from about +; toZinch. Certain specimens from Shawfair and Woolmet appear to have undergone much pressure, the bones and scales being very thin, though retaining their markings as distinctly as ever, and the teeth being considerably flattened, especially at their bases, as might have been expected. In these instances, however, the enamel cap remains unaffected, standing out all the more distinctly, while the striz on the body of the tooth are also more strongly marked. These appearances are, I think, certainly due to changes occurring during fossilization, and not to specific difference. 262 Dr. R. H. Traquair on Fossil Fishes The principal characters of the genus may be summed up as below :— NeMATOPTYCHIUS, Traq.,= Pygopterus, Ag., partim. Body slender; head large, with bluntly pointed projecting muzzle ; orbit far forward; gape very wide, with powerfully developed jaws; operculum rather small. Dentition power- fully developed ; teeth of two principal sizes, acutely conical, and enamel-tipped. Pectoral and ventral fins moderate ; rays of the pectoral articulated ; dorsal and anal fins nearly equal, large, triangular ; dorsal situated nearly opposite the anal ; tail completely heterocercal ; fin-fulcra small. Scales very peculiar in form ; those of the flanks much higher than long, with a flat triangular articular process arising from the whole, or nearly the whole, upper margin; anterior-superior and _posterior- inferior angles of the exposed face of the scale obtuse; orna- ment consisting of fine closely set thread-like ridges. Nematoptychius Greenockii, Ag., sp.—The only species of the genus, and as yet only obtained from the Scottish Carboni- ferous strata. For further details as to the general configuration and struc- ture of this fish, including the osteology of the head, I must refer the reader to my previously quoted memoir in the ‘Trans- actions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh.’ Il. Wardichthys cyclosoma, gen. et sp. nov. This little fish, in my own collection, is contained in a nodule of clay ironstone from the shales at Wardie, and was found on the beach there, about fifteen yearsago. It is entire, with the exception of the tail, which 1s unfortunately wanting. The body, including the head, measures 3 inches in length by 23 at its greatest depth, and is remarkable for its nearly circular outline, and especially for the highly arched contour of the back, the ventral margin being much less curved. Fig. 1, Pl. XVL., represents the “ counterpart’ or impression of the specimen, which, however, will convey a better idea of the form of the fish than the other half of the nodule, as from the latter a little bit of the back unfortunately splintered off and was lost in the act of splitting it open. The head equals about } the total length, without the tail ; it is a little crushed over towards the right side, and a good deal of displacement seems to have taken place with the facial bones, only a few of which are recognizable, The cranium proper is short, the snout blunt and rounded as in Mesolepis; and the Srom the Neighbourhood of Edinburgh. 263 orbit seems to have been well forward, as in the last-named genus. In Pl. XVI. fig. 2 I have indicated in diagrammatic outline the various bones which may be distinctly made out. Behind we have a pair of parietals (p), in front of which are the more elongated fronta/s, of which the impression of the right one (f) is seen; on the outer side of the parietal is a plate (sq), which answers to the sguamosal, in frontof which, and external to the frontal, is another (p.f) which may be reckoned as the post- frontal. The bones of the ethmoidal region, forming the short rounded snout, are too much crushed for description. All these cranial bones, as shown by their impressions, were ornamented by beautiful branching and anastomosing flexuous ridges ; the impressions of their internal surfaces, shown by removing the friable bone from the other half of the specimen, display lines radiating from the ossific centres ; and here also a groove, tra- versing longitudinally the frontal and parietal, betrays the _course of the usual slime-canal. Very little is seen of the facial bones. A portion of the hyomandibular (h.m) is seen passing downwards and slightly backwards from under the squamosal, and seems to have been a rather slender bone like that of Pale- oniscus. ‘The operculum (op) is shaped much like that of Mesolepis, being four-sided, rather higher than broad, and with round posterior-superior and posterior-inferior angles; it is evidently plead, somewhat upwards and backwards. Below it is the suboperculum (s.op), also displaced and apparently a little turned round, so that what I conceive to be its upper margin comes in fact to look as much forwards as upwards. The only other recognizable facial bone is the mawilla (mz), a plate of considerable size, gently convex externally and broader behind than in front; its external surface was orna- mented by wavy ridges very similar to those on the cranial bones. ‘The lower jaw and branchiostegal rays are, unfortu- nately, not discoverable, nor have I been able to detect any trace of teeth. Shoulder-girdle.—The first supraclavicular (suprascapular, Owen) is a very large, nearly square-shaped plate (1st s.c/), which is placed behind the parietal, and is apparently in con- tact at the middle line with its fellow of the opposite side. By its lower margin it articulates with the second supraclavicular (scapular, Owen), also of considerable size. This bone (2nd s.cl) is vertically oblong in form, rather broad above, where it is obliquely traversed by the lateral slime-canal before that tube enters the scales of the lateral line, and narrowing down to a point below. I exposed the whole of it by sacrificing and chiselling off the operculum (which covered a large part of it), as the whole contour of the last-mentioned bone is so well seen 264 Dr. R. H. Traquair on Fossil Fishes in impression on the half of the nodule represented in fig. 1. In the diagrammatic outline, fig. 2, the second supraclavicular is seen largely covered by the somewhat displacat operculum. Both supraclaviculars agree very closely in form and position with the corresponding bones in Mesolepis, as seen by com- mag with a very beautiful and perfect specimen of JZ. sca- aris, Young, kindly lent me by my friend Mr. Ward. Some traces of an elongated clavicle are also seen, but not suf- ficiently marked for description. Fins.—The specimen dene no trace of either pectorals or ventrals. ‘The eval fin is small, and commences consider- ably behind the centre of the arch of the back ; it is composed of numerous closely set rays, divided by very frequent trans- verse articulations. ‘The most anterior rays are very short, but they increase rapidly in length to the ninth or tenth, from which the margin of the fin again falls away, so that it becomes more fringe-like posteriorly, where the rays are seen also re- peatedly to bifureate. Traces of fine fulera are seen on the anterior margin. On the opposite aspect of the body some re- mains of the anal fin are seen—unfortunately only a few broken rays; yet from these we may pretty safely conclude that it cor- responded in size and position to the dorsal. Scales.—The scales of the side of the body are high and narrow, diminishing very regularly in size from before back- wards. Their form is rhomboidal, the acute angles being the posterior-superior and the anterior-inferior, The external surface of each presents a well-defined, smooth anterior margin, produced downwards into the lower acute angle or point of the scale, overlapped by the scale in front, and corre- sponding to the thickened articular rib on the internal aspect. he latter is by no means strongly marked: it passes above into a pointed articular spine of moderate size ; and below, it is obliquely bevelled off behind for the articular depression which receives the corresponding peg of the scale next below. The exposed surface is ornamented by a beautiful granular tuberculation, the little tubercles sometimes being arranged in lines or coalescing into short ridges, whose direction is always more or less across the scale, some tendency to radiation downwards towards the posterior-inferior angle being also often observed towards the lower part. ‘This tendency of the tubercles to coalesce into transverse ridges is most pronounced in those scales which are situated more posteriorly (Pl. XVI. fig. 3), though I observe it also in one placed just behind the lower part of the suboperculum. ‘lhe two scales repre- sented in fig. 3 are from the lateral line, a little in front of the origin of the dorsal fin; they are seen to be each marked with Srom the Neighbourhood of Edinburgh. 265 a slight notch on the posterior margin, and are evidently obliquely perforated by the lateral slime-canal. Towards the dorsal and ventral margins the scales get considerably lower than on the flanks. Those represented in fig. 5 (also magnified two diameters) are from a situation further to the front of the fish than those from which fig. 3 was taken—namely, from the belly, a little distance behind and below the suboperculum. In them the articular spine is very broad and triangular, arising from the entire upper margin of the scale, and showing besides a few peculiar grooves on the surface, radiating from the middle of the base. The foregoing description of the configuration of the scales has, together with the illustrative drawings, been principally taken from impressions left on the hard ironstone after very careful removal of the friable osseous matter, and from accurate “ squeezes”’ in modelling-wax taken from the same. Conclusion.—F rom the foregoing description it is at once evi- dent that the little fish just described belongs to the Paleozoic section of Dr. Young’s suborder of Lepidopleuride ; but it can hardly be included in any previously described genus. Neces- sarily leaving dentition out of consideration, the shape of the body and the relations of the dorsal fin alone widely distinguish it from Mesolepis and Amphicentrum. From Platysomus it is also separated by the form of the head, with its short blunt snout and relatively more anteriorly placed orbit, as well as by the nature of the scale-ornament, which in all the described species of Platysomus consists of fine vertical or slightly diagonal ridges or striz. In the typical Platysom7 too (e. g. Pl. gibbosus, striatus) “the dorsal tin commences at the cu/- minating point of the dorsal ridge, and extends thence to the upper lobe of the caudal fin, the component rays diminishing very gradually in length from first to last ;” moreover it con- tains “from 80 to 100 fin-rays’”’*; here, on the other hand, the dorsal fin commences very much behind the highest point of the back and contains considerably fewer rays, though their exact number is not ascertainable. There only remains the very imperfectly known genus Cletthrolepis, Egertont, from beds of doubtful Carboniferous age in. New South Wales, and which, to certain points of resemblance to Platysomus, adds the peculiarity of having a homocercal tail; this organ, being absent in our specimen, is not available as a means of compa- rison. Although the rounded figure and posteriorly arising dorsal fin of Cletthrolepis, added to Sir Philip Egerton’s state- * Sir Philip Egerton, in ‘ Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. London,’ 1864, xx. p. 3. + Loe, cit. p. 3, and pl. i, figs, 2 & 3, 266 Dr. R. H. Traquair on Fossil Fishes ment that the scales are granulated, do remind us of the fish under consideration, yet so little is known of the structural details of the Australian fish, that all evidence of generic identity is wanting. As far as Sir Philip Egerton’s ae tion and figures go, however, the head of Cleithrolepis would seem to have been much smaller in proportion, the vertical rows of scales much more numerous, * the articulating rib on the anterior margin of the inner surface of each scale very considerably stronger. On the whole, I think it is better to bestow a new generic title on the present fish ; and accordingly I propose for it the name Wardichthys*, coupled with the specific designation cyclosoma. T ‘ ra a + WARDICHTHYS, gen. et sp. nov., Traquair. Body flat, nearly circular, back very highly arched; dorsal and anal fins small, opposite, the former arising much behind the culminating point of the rounded dorsal arch and extend- ing to the tail-pedicle. Pectoral, ventral, and caudal fins unknown, the latter probably heterocercal. Scales ornamented externally with fine tubercles, which often coalesce into short transverse ridges; lepidopleura weak. Snout short, rounded ; orbit well forward; cranial bones ornamented by fine flexuous ridges or strie. Wardichthys cyclosoma.—The only known species ; and of it, as yet, only one specimen has been obtained, from the Lower Carboniferous shales of Wardie (Newhaven), on the Frith of Forth, near Edinburgh. Ill. Rhizodus Hibberti, Agass., sp. A specimen of Rhizodus Hibberti, Agass., sp., from the blackband ironstone of Gilmerton, recently acquired by the Edinburgh Museum of Science and Art, throws some addi- tional light on the structure of this remarkable and gigantic fish, concerning which so little is yet known in spite of the comparative abundance of fragmentary remains. It is a fragment of what would apparently have been a most magni- ficent and truly unique specimen, had the whole of it been obtained ; as it is, it shows a portion of the head, shoulder, and anterior part of the body of an example of moderate, or rather small size, for a Rhizodus at least. The entire * In honour of Mr. J. Ward, of Longton, Staffordshire, to whom I am indebted for much valuable assistance in the study of Carboniferous fishes. Strom the Neighbourhood of Edinburgh. 267 length of the fragment is 16 inches, and its greatest breadth 8 inches; in front there are some mutilated and unread- able remains of the head extending back for about 6 inches ; but here a few doubly trenchant teeth of the well-known aspect and structure settle the question as to its being a Rhizodus. Behind these head-remains, and lying across the specimen, is a great part of a well-marked clavicle, resembling in shape that of MHoloptychius and ornamented externally by reticulating ridges, furrows, and pits. The amount of it seen is 53 inches in length; it is overlapped in front by some por- tions of head-bone, probably opercular ; above, it is broken off at the edge of the specimen; and below, its termination is not very distinct, though I am rather disposed to think that another portion of bone coming on here is the ¢nterclavicular. The posterior margin shows a shallow excavation, from which issues a pectoral fin, obtusely or “ subacutely” lobate in shape. The “lobe” is 3 inches long by 12 broad ; it is fringed with rays on the upper and posterior margins, some remains of them extending also a little round on the lower. The most perfect rays are those on the extremity of the lobe, where 2 inch of their length is seen ; they are slender, smooth, and very closely set; for an inch of their length they are unarticu- lated, after which transverse divisions are evident. Behind the remains of the head and pectoral arch the speci- men is covered by scales, which agree perfectly with those which we have been accustomed to refer to Rhizodus Hibberti. They lie for the most part undisturbedly cn situ, deeply im- bricating over each other, but, as usual, are mostly so split that only their internal structure, not their external sculpture, can be seen. One of these scales, just behind the upper end of the clavicle and pushed rather out of place, is seen to mea- sure 13 inch in length by 1} in breadth; on the pectoral lobe the scales are very much smaller. It is much to be regretted that the above-described fragment is all that has been saved of a specimen which was probably entire before the miner invaded its ironstone bed. Neverthe- less the discovery of the pectoral fin of Rhizodus is of great interest, inasmuch as it furnishes us with another most im- portant point of deviation of its structure from that of the Devonian genus Holoptychius, with which it was so long and so obstinately confounded. In Holoptychius the pectoral, as shown by Prof. Huxley, is long and very acutely lobate, like that of Glyptolepis; the obtusely lobate corresponding fin of Rhizodus shows that it must be placed apart from these, in a distinct subdivision of the great Glyptodipterine family, along with its smaller congener Lhizodopsis. 268 Mr. A. Haly on new Speetes of Fish. EXPLANATION OF PLATE XVI. Fig. 1. Wardichthys cyclosoma, Traq.; impression of right side of the fish, natural size. . Diagrammatic outline of the recognizable bones of the head and shoulder: p, parietal; 7, frontal; sg, squamosal; p.f, post- frontal ; op, operculum; s.op, suboperculum ; mz, maxillary; h.m, hyomandibular; Ist s.cl, first supraclavicular; 2nd s,el, second supraclavicular. Fig. 3. Scales from the lateral line situated a little in front of a perpen- dicular from the commencement of the dorsal fin, manned two diameters. . 4. Inner aspect of another flank-scale, magnified two diameters. 5. Several scales from near the ventral margin, a little distance below and behind the suboperculum, also magnified two diameters. Fig. 6. Inner surface of scale of Pygopterus mandibularis, Agass., magni- fied. After Sir P. G. Egerton, in King’s ‘ Permian Fossils. 7. Outline of a peculiarly short maxillary bone of Nematoptychius Greenockii, Agass., sp. The contour is seen in impression, all the actual bone that remains is along the dental margin. Fig. 8. Tooth of Nematoptychius Greenockii, seen from the outer side of the jaw, and magnified four diameters. Fig. 9. Flank-scale of the same fish, magnified three diameters. Fig. 10. Inner surface of a similar scale. Fig. 11. Ornament of a group of four scales from the back of another specimen, also enlarged three diameters. fe! S bo XXXV.— Descriptions of new Species of Fish in the Collection of the British Museum. By A. HAty. Hemulon hians. D. 2. A; 2. L. lat. 50. Ii. transy. 5 15 The height of the body equals the length of the head, and is contained thtee times and a half in the total. The snout is of moderate length, rather longer than the eye, which is con- tained three times and a half in the length of the head. The cleft of the mouth is very wide, the maxillary reaching to the vertical from the centre of the eye. Preeoperculum with the posterior limb nearly vertical, obtusely denticulated, the denti- culations somewhat stronger at the angle. Dorsal deeply notched ; the fourth spine longest, nearly half the length of the head, the last spine longer than the eleventh. Caudal forked. Second anal spine stronger but scarcely longer than the third, as long as the sixth dorsal spine. Pectoral one fifth of the total length. The fish appears to have been longi- tudinally striped. Two specimens in spirits from Bahia, and a young stuffed specimen from the same locality. ‘The adults are 74 inches long. Mr, A. Haly on new Species of Fish. 269 Pristipoma variolosum, D. A. A L. lat.52. LL. transv. 5/12. The height of the body is contained three times, the head four times in the total length. The diameter of the eye nearly equals the length of the snout, and is contained three times and two thirds in the length of the head. The snout is rather short; the cleft of the mouth moderate; the maxillary ex- tends to the front margin of the orbit. Praeoperculum slightly sinuous posteriorly. ‘The dorsal is deeply notched ; the fourth spine longest, it is contained once and two thirds in the length of the head. Caudal slightly concave. Second anal spine very long and strong, longer than the fourth dorsal. Pectoral nearly one fourth of the total length. Silvery, the upper two thirds with brownish dots. Dorsal fin with a series of brownish spots along its base ; dark spot on the opercle. Two specimens from the Cameroons. The largest is 7} inches long. Percis caudimaculatum. Py Ser. ee 15. be lat, Do. The height of the body is contained seven times, the length of the head four times and a half in the total length. The diameter of the eye is twice the width of the interorbital space. The preoperculum is slightly denticulated. The ventrals do not reach to the origin of the anal. The central spines of the dorsal fin are the longest. Body with six vertical brown bands, interrupted by a lighter longitudinal line; a black spot at the upper angle of the root of the caudal. Four specimens from North China. The largest is 4} inches long. Sciena margaritifera. D.10+,. A.?. L.lat. 74, LL. transv. 2. 27-28" The height of the body is contained four times or four times and a third in the total length, the length of the head about four times; the diameter of the eye is contained four times and a half in the length of the head. The length of the snout scarcely exceeds the diameter of the eye; it is slightly convex, with the jaws nearly equal in front. The upper maxillary reaches to the vertical from the posterior margin of the orbit. The upper jaw has an outer series of larger teeth. The pra- operculum is rounded, finely denticulated ; the operculum has two points. Caudal pointed. Anal spine feeble, one fourth of the length of the head. Coloration (in spirit) uniform; a Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Ser. 4. Vol. xv. 270 Mr, A. W. E. O'Shaughnessy on series of silvery spots along the lateral line; a black spot in theaxil, Two specimens from Port Natal. Length 11} inches. Sphyrena Giinthert. D. 5. A.d. L. lat. 130. LL. transv. 22. 5° The height of the body is one ninth of the total length ; the length of the head is contained three times and two thirds in the total; the diameter of the eye is rather more than one seventh of the length of the head. The opercle has a single noint ; the opercles are scaly, and the preoperculum is rounded. The lower jaw with a short fleshy appendage anteriorly. The pectorals are contained nearly ten times in the total length ; they are one third longer than the ventrals; the spine of the latter is nearly as long as the rays. The origin of the dorsal is on a level with the extremity of the pectorals, but somewhat behind the root of the ventrals, considerably in front of the middle of the length of the body. ‘The interspace between the dorsals is equal to one seventh of the total length. The maxillary reaches to the anterior margin of the eye. One specimen from Colon, Atlantic. Length 16 inches. XXXVI.—List and Revision of the Species of Anolidee in the British-Museum Collection, with Descriptions of new Species. By A. W. E. O’Suaucunessy, Assistant in the Natural- History Department. Since the date of the publication of Dr. Gray’s ‘Catalogue of Lizards in the British Museum’ large additions have been made to the collection of specimens of the group Anolis, Many of these additional specimens were examined by Mr. Cope some years since, and furnished him with the types of new species, which he described in the ‘ Proceedings’ of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. The followin list is the result of a recent study of the entire series, shal gives the names of all the species which appear to me to be represented in it. . CHAMZLEOLIS, Coct. Chameleolis fernandina, Coct., Sagra’s Cuba, p. 145, t. xii. Anolis chameleonides, Dum. & Bibr. Erp. Gén. iy. p. 168. Chamealeolis porcus, Gundlach, Rep. fis.-nat. Cuba, ii. p. 109; Cope, Proc. yO Philad. 1864, p. 168. the Species of Anolidx. 271 XipHosurus, Fitz., Gray. NXiphosurus Ricordii, Dum. & Bibr. 1. c. p. 167; Gray, Ann. Nat. Hist. 1840, v. p. 111. - Eupristis baleatus, Cope, 1. e. p. 168. ‘Two adult specimens, one being the type of Cope’s Hupristis baleatus, which proves to be the same species. Both from San Domingo. X. cristatellus, Dum. & Bibr. /. c. p. 143; Dum. Cat. Rept. 1851, p. 58; Reinh. & Liitk. Vid. Medd. 1862, p. 249. There are now numerous specimens of this species in the collection. X. homolechis, Cope, Proc. Acad. Philad. 1864, p. 169. The type specimen is the single example referred by Dr. Gray to the preceding species. It is distinguished by a quite different scutellation of the upper surface of the head and muzzle—viz.smaller, irregular, and keeled, instead of the sym- metrical flat plates. West Indies. X. ferreus, Cope, Proc. Acad. Philad. 1864, p. 168. The type, a large specimen, from Guadeloupe. DactyLoa, Wagl. Dactyloa equestris, Merr. Tent. p. 45; Dum. & Bibr. 7. ¢. - | p- 157; Gray, /.¢. p. 111. Anolis rhodolemus, Bell, Zool. Journ. iii. p. 235, t.xx.; Sloane, Jamaica, _ di. p. 278, fig. 2. The second specimen referred in Dr. Gray’s Catalogue to this species is a Urostrophus Vautiert. D. Edwardsii, Mery. 1. c. p. 45; Dum. & Bibr. J. ¢. p. 161; Dum. Cat. Rept. p. 59. RuHINOSAURUS, Gray. Rhinosaurus gracilis, Neuwied, Bras. tab. fig. 2, Voy. ii. p. 131; Wagl. Syst. p. 148 (Dactyloa gracilis). Anolis nasicus, Dum, & Bibr. J. c. p. 115; Dum. Cat. Rept. p. 57. i9® 272 Mr. A. W. E, O'Shaughnessy on ANOLIS. A. With smooth ventral scales. Anolis bimaculatus, Sparrm. N. Act. Stock. v. p. 169, t. iv. fig. 1; Merr. lc. p. 45. Anolis Leachii, Dum. & Bibr. /.c. p.153; Dum, Cat. Rept. p. 58, Gray, Cat. p. 200. A, maculatus, Gray, Aun. Nat. Hist. 1840, v. p. 112. A, reticulatus, Gray, Ann. Nat. Hist. 1840, vy. p. 114; Cat. p. 204. A, alliaceus, Cope, l. c. p. 175. The types of the two latter are in the British Museum, and prove to be identical with the present species. A, punctatus, Daud. Rept. iv. p. 84, t. Ixvi. fig. 2; Dam. & Bibr. J. c. p. 112; Dum. Cat. p. 57. A, viridis, Newwied, Bras. fig. 1 ; Voy. ii. p. 152. A, violaceus, Spix, Lac. Bras. p. 15, t. xvil. fig. 2. The collection now possesses one adult specimen from Rio Janeiro. A, Cepedii, Merr. 1. c, p. 44; Gray, Cat. p. 201. A, alligator, Dum. & Bibr. 1. ¢. : 134; Bocourt, Miss. Se. Mex. iii, p. 59, note; Cope, Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 1869, p. 162. A, trinitatis, Reinh. & Liitk. Vid. Medd. 1862, p. 269. A. Goudotii, Dum. & Bibr. l. c. p. 108 (type Mus. Par.). A. eneus, Gray, Cat. p, 205. ., fhe aes described by Dr. Gray as A. eneus, presented by Th. Bell, Esq., is in my opinion a young specimen of A. alligator, Dum. & Bibr. A, luctus, Dum. & Bibr. 1. e. p. 105; Coct., Sagra’s Cuba, p- 136, t. xii. A, argenteolus, Cope, Proc. Acad. Philad. 1861, p. 213. Previously to the specimens named A. argenteolus by Mr. Cope, this species was not represented in our collection ; but after comparison with Cocteau’s description, I cannot avoid referring them to A. luctus. A. chlorocyanus, Dum. & Bibr. /. c. p. 117; Reinh. & Liitk, Vid. Medd. 1862, p. 266. A, (Ctenocercus) celestinus, Cope, Proc. Acad. Philad. 1862, p. 177. Specimens from San Domingo, named A, celestinus by Mr. Cope. the Speetes of Anolide. 273 A, fusco-auratus, D’Orb. Voy. Amér., Rept. t. iii. fig. 2; Dum.& Bibr. Zc. p. 110; Dum. Cat. Rept. p. 56; Bocourt, Ann. Mus. vi. 1869, Bullet. p. 15, Miss. Sc. Mex. iii. pl. xiv. fig. 16. A, viridieneus, Peters, Monatsb. Berl. 1863, p. 147. Hitherto unrepresented in the collection. Specimens from Para and Guayaquil. A, Grahami, Gray, Ann. Nat. Hist. 1840, v. p. 113; Cat. Liz. pp: 203 & 274; Cope, 7. c. 1861, p. 210, Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 1869, p. 164. A, punctatissimus, Hallowell, Proc. Acad. Philad. 1856, p. 225, A, heterolepis, Hallowell, /. c. p. 230. A. oe and A, opalinus, Gosse, Ann, & Mag. Nat. Hist. 1850, vi. p- . It is important to establish the fact that Mr. Gosse’s two species are the older A. Grahami, of which there would never have been any uncertainty had not Dr. Gray stated that the a on which he founded the species were from Dr. ardner’s Brazilian collection. The real entry in the register shows that he obtained them from a dealer named Gardiner without indication of a locality; and there can be no doubt that they came from Jamaica, this species being one of the commonest in the island. A, acutus, Hallowell, Proc. Acad. Philad. 1856, p. 228; Reinh. & Liitk. 7. c. 1862, p. 252; Cope, /. c. 1861, p. 209. A, Newtoni, Giinth. Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. 1859, iv. p. 212, pl. iv. ? Lacerta principalis, West, Beytr. z. Besch. v. S. Cruz. Numerous specimens from Santa Cruz and Dominica. A, gingivinus, Cope, Proc. Acad. Philad. 1864, p. 170, and 1871, p. 220. The types (male and female) from Anguilla Island. A. distichus, Cope, Proc. Acad. Philad. 1861, p. 208; Proc. Am. Phil. don 1869, p. 164. A. carbonarius, Daudin. A, dominicensis, Reinh. & Liitk. /. ¢. p. 261. Specimens from the Copenhagen Museum and specimens named by Mr. Cope enable me to confirm his statement of the identity of the species. A, stratulus, Cope, Proc. Acad. Philad. 1861, p. 209; Reinh. _& Liitk. Vid. Medd. 1862, p. 255. Numerous specimens from St. Thomas’s Island. 274 Mr. A. W. E. O’Shaughnessy on A. cybotes, Cope, Proc. Acad. Philad. 1862, p. 177; Proc, Am. Phil. Soc. 1869, p. 164. "A, Riisei, Reinh. & Liitk. 1. e. p. 264. Specimens (male and female) from San Domingo. A. gibbiceps, Cope, Proc. Acad. Philad. 1864, p. 174. The type (female) from Caracas. A, citrinellus, Cope, Proc. Acad, Philad, 1864, p, 170. The type from San Domingo. A. damulus, Cope, Proc. Acad. Philad, 1864, p. 169. - The type presented by Dr. Giinther. A, insignis, Cope, 1, c. 1871, p. 213. A fine specimen, brought from Costa Rica by Mr, Salvin agrees with Mr. Cope’s recent description of this well-marked Species. A, Bouviert, Bocourt, Miss. Sc, Mex. iii. p. 58, pl. xiv. fig. 8. Three specimens from Pebas and Guayaquil. The tail, perfect, is compressed and has the upper edge serrated, as described by M. Bocourt. A. transversalis, Dum. Cat. Rept. p. 57; Arch. du Mus. viii. _ p. 515, pl. xix. fig. 3; Guichen. in Casteln. Amér. du S., Rept.p 17, A, impetigosus, Cope, Proc. Acad. Philad. 1864, p. 174. Mr. Cope’s type, of which the habitat is unknown, being in the collection, I am able to refer it to the above species, de- scribed by Duméril. > A. heterodermus, Dum. 1. c. p. 59, and lc. p. 516, pl, xix. fig. 4. . Adult and half-grown specimens from Bogota enable me to add this other remarkable species, described by Duméril, to the list. B. Ventral scales keeled. A, (Dactyloa) biporcatus, Wiegm. Herp. Mex. p. 47; Bocourt, Miss. Sc. Mex. p. 98, pl. xv. fig. 8. A, (Draconura) vittigerus, Cope, Proc. Acad. Philad. 1862, p. 179, A single specimen from Rio Polochic, Guatemala, presented the Species of Anolide. 275 by the Paris Museum, and numerous others named A. vitti- gerus by Mr. Cope. This species was referred by Dr. Gray to A. principalis, A, Fraseri, Giinth. P. Z, 5. 1859, p. 407. A, bitectus, Cope, 1. c. 1864, p. 171. A fine series, with some large specimens recently added. Some of the specimens have been named A. pentaprion and A. vittigerus by Mr. Cope; and the two types of his A. bitectus dre also found to be the present species. A. Petersti, Bocourt, Miss. Sc, Mex. iii. p. 79, pl. xiii, fig. 2, & pl. xv. figs. 11, 11a. Two fine specimens and a young one in the collection are to be referred to this species. They are from Mexico, A, Sagrei, Cocteau, Sagra’s Cuba, Rept. p. 131, t. x.; Dum. & Bibr. /.c. p. 150; Dum. Cat. Rept. p. 58; Cope, /. c. 1862, p. 178, note; Bocourt, /.¢. p. 81, pl. xv. fig. 14. A. ordinatus, Cope, 1. c. 1864, p. 175. A large series, including the types of Mr. Cope’s species, and those hitherto placed by Dr. Gray under A. nebulosus, Wiegm., with which he confounded this species. A. maculatus, Gray, Ann. Nat. Hist. 1840, v. p. 113 ; Cat. Liz. p- 203; Reinh. & Liitk. lc. p. 268. ' A. lineatopus, Gray, Ann. Nat. Hist. 1840, v. p. 115 ; Cat. Liz. p. 203. This species has a great resemblance to the last, but the ventral scales are considerably larger. Numerous specimens are now in the collection from Jamaica; the type of A. linea- topus is the same species. _ A, pulchellus, Dum. & Bibr. 7. c. p. 97; Dum, Cat. p. 56; Reinh. & Liitk. /. c. p. 257. Now well represented, from St. Thomas’s Island. A, Richardi, Dum. & Bibr. 7. c. p. 141; Gray, Ann. Nat. Hist 1840, v. p. 113 ; Cat. B. M. p. 202. A. occipitalis, Gray, I. c. p. 112; Cat. Brit. Mus. p. 201. A, stenodactylus, Gray, l.c. p. 114; Cat. Brit. Mus. p, 204. All the specimens referred to or described by Dr. Gray under the above three heads belong to this species, 276 Mr. A. W. E. O'Shaughnessy on A, principalis, L. A. carolinensis, Dum. & Bibr. 1. ¢. p. 121. A, poreatus, Gray, Ann. Nat. Hist. 1840, vy. p. 112; Cat. Brit. Mus. p- 202. The specimens described under the latter name are indi- viduals of this species, with which the collection is now well supplied. It is not the Dactyloa biporcata of Wiegmann (as stated by Dr. Gray). A, nebulosus, Wiegm.; Bocourt, Miss. Se. Mex. p. 68, pl. xv. i One specimen recently eauied from Cuernavaca, those referred to this species by Dr. Gray being A. Sagrei, Coct. A, Sallet, Giinth. P. Z. 8S. 1859, p. 405; Bocourt, /.¢. p. 90, pl. xi. fig. 3, pl. xvi. fig. 21. A, cyanopleurus, Cope, l.c. 1861, p. 211. A, spectrum, Peters, Berl. MB. 1863, p. 136. Specimens from San Domingo and from Cuba. A, semilineatus, Cope, /.c. 1864, p. 171. The type from San Domingo. A. ophiolepis, Cope, 7. c. 1861, p. 211. One specimen from Cuba, presented by Dr. Peters. A. Copet, Bocourt, Miss. Se. Mex. p. 77, pl. xv. figs. 10, 10a. A fine specimen has been recently procured of Mr. Salvin from Costa Rica. A. nebuloides, Bocoutrt, J. c. p. 74, pl. xiii. fig. 10. Two specimens from Huamuchla, from Mr. Boucard. A, crassulus, Cope, l. c. 1864, p. 173. The types and other specimens. Central America. A, nannodes, Cope, l..c. p, 173 ; Bocourt, U.c. p. 71, Diamae fig. 5. The types and one other example, from Coban. A, ustus, Cope, l.c. p. 172. The types from Belize. the Species of Anolide. 277 A. cymbops, Cope, lc. p. 173. “The type from Vera Cruz. PLAcopsis, Gosse. Placopsis Valenciennit, Dum. & Bibr. /. c. p. 131. P. ocellata, Gosse, Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. 1850, ii. p. 346. A, leucocephalus, Hallow. Proc, Acad. Philad. 1856, p. 226, Xiphocercus Valenciennit, Cope, /, c. 1861, p. 215. ACANTHOLIS, Coct. Acantholis Loysiana, Coct. lc. p. 141; Dum. & Bibr. Jc. p- 100; Bocourt, /. c. p. 69, pl. xiv. fig. 9. ‘2A. argillaceus, Cope, 1. c. 1862, p. 176. One specimen from Cuba, presented by Dr. Peters. Norors, Wael. Norops auratus, Wagl. Syst. p. 149; Wiegm. lc. p. 16; Dum. & Bibr. /. c. p. 82, pl. 37; Bocourt, 7. c. p. 108, pl. xi. figs. 5, 5a, pl. xvi. fig. 33, a, b. A, perissurus, Cope. There are now five adult specimens in the collection, one of which is the “type of A. perisswrus, Cope.” N. tropidonotus, Peters, Berl. Monatsb. 1863, p. 135 ; Bocourt, l.c. p. 103, pl. xii. fig. 6, pl. xvi. fig. 30. A large series of examples is now added to the collection. Having found that the specimen referred in Dr. Gray’s catalogue to Draconura chrysolepis is really Norops auratus, I am now enabled to recognize this well-marked species, the examples of which I had supposed to be N. auratus. (See ‘Annals,’ 1869, iii. p. 183 &e.) Draconura, Wagl. Draconura nitens, Wagl. |. c.; Peters, /. ce. 1863, p. 142. A, refulgens, Schleg.; Dum. & Bibr. /.c. p. 91. Three adult specimens from Pebas, collected by Mr. Bates, D. catenata, Gosse, Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. 1850, ii. p. 344, The type from Jamaica. 278 Mr. A. W. E. O'Shaughnessy on D. chrysolepis, Dum. & Bibr. le. p. 94; Guichen. Casteln. Amér. ii. p. 15, pl. iv. fig. 1; Bocourt, 1c. p. 99, pl. xvi. fig. 26. . A, scypheus, Cope, /. c. 1864, p. 172. The specimen referred in Dr. Gray’s Catalogue to this species is a Norops auratus. There are now two adults from Caracas and the Amazons, one of which is the type of Mr, Cope’s A. seypheus. D. capito, Peters, Berl. Monatsb. 1863, p. 142 ; Bocourt, /. ¢. p- 101, pl. xvi. fig. 27. A, carneus, Cope, J. c, 1864, p. 171. Two fine specimens (male and female) from Vera Paz, collected by Mr. Salvin; the types of Mr. Cope’s A. carneus. Anolis nummifer, sp. n. Head a little shorter than tibia, its breadth two thirds of its length. Hind limbs long, reaching beyond the tip of the snout. Ear-opening not half the longitudinal diameter of the eye. Lateral canthus of muzzle sharp. Scales of muzzle roundish or polygonal, irregularly ridged, sometimes tri- carinate; supraorbital ridges separated by two rows on the vertex, widely divergent anteriorly. Supraocular disk com- posed of about fifteen polygonal keeled scales, bounded ex- ternally by granules. Occipital large, elongate, with the angles rounded, half the length of the eye, with central tubercle. Scales of body very convex, granular, becoming modified into keeled scales on the central regions of the back, but scarcely increasing in size. Scales of lower surface larger, regularly arranged, rounded and keeled; of limbs keeled externally, granular internally. Tail not broadened at the base, round ; scales small, keeled. Goitre very slightly developed. Digital expansions well developed. Colours: above bronzed brown; a brown stripe across the orbital region. Sides with large round dark spots, extending in the form of dots on the lower surface of body and limbs; the latter viridescent. Female with bright longitudinal dorsal stripe. ze specimens in the collection of the British Museum, from the Demerara Falls. Anolis turmalis, sp. n. Head a little shorter than tibia, shaped as in the last. new Species of Anolidee. 279 Scales of muzzle either convex only or indistinctly keeled. Supraorbitals separated on vertex by two rows of scales. Occipital large, ovate, larger than the ear-opening, and half the length of the eye. Polygonal scales of supraocular disk numerous, convex or weakly keeled. Infraorbitals two rows. Form elongate, slender. Hind limb reaching to or beyond ex-. tremity of muzzle. Several series of regular keeled scales on middle of back, larger than the granules which cover the sides, but smaller than the ventral scales, which are ovate and keeled. Tail long, rounded, covered with scales like those of the belly. - Digital expansions well developed. Colours: bronzed brown above ; an orbital transverse stripe ; lower surface viridescent ; darker variegations on the back, taking the form of oblique streaks on the sides, as in Dra- conura chrysolepis. Specimens in the British Museum from the island of Grenada. Anolis tessellatus, sp. n. Resembles A. transversalis. Head not quite twice as long as broad, no frontal concavity ; covered with large polygonal flat scales ; the supraorbitals in contact; the occipital large, but separated from these by several scales ; the occipital region bounded triangularly by feebly raised ridges. Har-opening small,round. Scales of back and sides polygonal or roundish, smooth ; of belly larger, oval, imbricated, and keeled; those of the tail similar. Digital dilatations narrow. _ Colour: green, with brown markings on back and tail. Specimen in the British Museum, collected by Mr. Salvin in Costa Rica. Anolis lentiginosus, sp. n. Head short, broad, obtuse, much shorter than tibia, its width being two thirds of its length; its height at the orbital region nearly equal to its width. Scales of the front and muzzle small, strongly tricarinate ; of occipital region very numerous, polygonal, flat, the occipital itself being scarcely distinguishable in their midst. Supraorbital borders composed of numerous small-sized scales, separated by one or more scales on the vertex, and elsewhere rapidly and widely divergent. Nearly the whole of the supraocular space covered by about twenty rather small keeled or rugose scales. Scales of middle dorsal ' region larger than those of the sides, and increasing in size gradually from the neck to the tail; they are striate, present- ing where the epidermis is preserved the appearance of being tricarinate ; continuing on the tail they become distinctly 280 On new Species of Anolide. keeled scales. Scales of the sides granular; of the belly larger than those of the back, ovate, strongly keeled. Hind limbs long, reaching considerably beyond the end of the muzzle. Digital expansions moderate. Kar-opening small round, ‘Tail broad at the base, somewhat compressed, rounded above. Goitre very small. Colour golden brown, freckled above with dark brown; a dark patch on the muzzle and a transverse orbital stripe ; two brown lines across the back before the root of the tail, and some oblique ones on the tibi. One specimen in the British Museum from Surinam, col- lected by Mr. Kappler. Anolis gemmosus, sp. 0. Elongate, slender. Head narrow, of about the same length as the tibia. Hind limb reaching to end of snout. Tail very long and tapering, three times the length of the head and body. Upper surface of the head entirely covered by polygonal rugose scales, very numerous and closely set, small on the muzzle and prefrontal regions, where they converge to the central con- cavity, which is feebly and gradually formed; larger, but of similar character, on the vertical and occipital portions, there being no conspicuous ridges on any part of the head; occipital scale as small as the others. Ear-opening small, vertical. Upper surface of body, including the sides, uni- formly covered by minute convex granules; ventral surface with equally uniform minute polygonal or rounded flat scales : the tail with minute keeled scales. Toes and claws slender, the expansions well developed. Colours prettily variegated. Ground-colour above appa- rently a lustrous brown, with blue and violet reflections; a series of glittering spots like arrow-heads pointing forwards along median line of back, and numerous ring-like ocelli on the sides, the sides of the belly and lower surface of the limbs being regularly ‘ocellated, and the chin variegated ; upper surface of limbs banded and spotted. ‘This species presents aresemblance to the Draconura nitens, which differs from it in the size and proportions of the head, and in the strongly keeled scales of the muzzle, size of the occipital, and other points. One specimen in the British Museum, the habitat of which is not indicated. Norops onca, sp. n. Head somewhat longer than tibia. Scales of muzzle convex and multicarinate, numerous; those of the supraorbital series Biographical Notice of the late Dr. J. KE. Gray. = 281 not much larger nor greatly raised, separated by several rows of convex scales; the occipital distinct, and larger than the surrounding scales, but small, elongate; a slight pit or depression on the region behind it. Two or three series of larger keeled scales on the superciliary space. Kar small, narrow, not much larger than the occipital. Scales of the back small, keeled; of the side elongate, oval, convex ; of the belly larger than those of the back, keeled ; of the tail like those of the back and belly ; of the limbs also keeled. The hind limb reaches to the eye ; the fore limb the length of the side. The toes are not dilated. Goitre very large, extending nearly to the middle of the abdomen. Colour pale brown, variegated with darker, in the form of large rhombic spots, open in the middle, along each side of the median line of the back; dark spots and streaks also on the sides, head, and limbs. Specimens in the British Museum from Venezuela and Dominica. XXXVII.— Biographical Notice of the late Dr. Joun EpWArD GRAY. Ir is our painful duty this month to record the death on the 7th ultimo of Dr. John Edward Gray, F.R.S. &e., who has been for the last seventeen years one of the Editors of this Journal. Dr. Gray was born at Walsall in the year 1800; so that at the time of his death he had just completed his 75th year. He was the son of Mr. S. F. Gray, the author of the well-known ‘Supplement to the Pharmacopeeia,’ and the grandson of Mr. Samuel Gray, a seedsman in Pall Mall, who possessed considerable scientific knowledge, translated the ‘ Philosophia Botanica’ of Linneeus for his friend Mr. Lee, of Hammersmith, and assisted him in the composition of his ‘ Introduction to Botany,’ which first made known the labours of the great Swedish naturalist to English readers. Dr. Gray may thus be regarded as belonging to a family in which natural- history tastes were hereditary. According to his own account he was a weakly and ailing child, confined to his chair for eight months in the year, and never eating animal food. At a very early age he says he began the world, to provide for himself and help his family. He was originally intended for the profession of medicine ; but his studies were very early turned specially to natural history; 282 Biographical Notice of the late Dr. J. E. Gray. in 1819 he had joined the London Philosophical Society, which numbered the late Mr. Faraday among its members, and in 1820 he was a member of the Philosophical Society of London, a society established in 1810 under the patronage of the Duke of Sussex, The old Entomological Society of London, the successor of the Aurelian Society, established in 1806, at this time held its meetings at No. 87 Hatton Garden ; and in 1822 Dr. Gray became a Fellow and Secretary of that Society, which was soon afterwards expanded into the Zoological Club of the Linnean Society. As the Fellowship of the Linnean Society was an essential qualification for being a member of the Zoolo- gical Club, John Edward Gray was excluded from it; for although he had been proposed as a Fellow of the Linnean Society by such men as Haworth, Vigors, J. I’. Stephens, Joseph Goodall, Latham, Griffith, and Salisbury, he was rejected by a large majority in a very full meeting, on the 16th of April, 1822. It 1s of course impossible now to ascer- tain the precise reasons for the rejection of a young naturalist who had already given evidence of no ordinary powers and attainments both in zoology and botany. Dr. Gray himself has suggested that his certificate, bearing “the names of at least four naturalists anxious to improve zoology and botany, may have frightened the regular ‘ Linneans,’ of whom Dr. Shaw may be considered afair example. He proposed putting his heel on or, as some say, breaking with a hammer all shells not in the twelfth edition of Linnzus’s ‘ Systema Nature.’ Things not in Linnzeus ought not to exist.” Such views as these are undoubtedly very narrow ; but, supposing them to exist, the policy of preventing the opposite party from gaining an accession of strength in the person of the young candidate would be intelligible, and to a certain extent respectable. But the reason actually assigned for his rejection was paltry. He was accused of having insulted the President of the Society, Sir James Edward Smith, by quoting the ‘ English Botany’ as Sowerby’s, Sir James having been hired by Sowerby to write the text for his plates. We should not have dwelt so long upon this miserable history but for the circumstance that, whatever may have been the cause of his rejection, the fact itself certainly had a great influence upon Dr. Gray’s character. One can easily under- stand that the circumstance of being thus ignominiously rejected must have been a bitter disappointment to a young and enthusiastic naturalist such as Gray then was; and we cannot wonder that he placed himself in decided antagonism to those whom he thought his enemies in the matter, and thus acquired that combative habit of mind which undoubtedly Biographical Notice of the late Dr. J. K. Gray. — 283 in after life procured him many “unfriends.” In 1826 the Zoological Club was developed into the Zoological Society, which Dr. Gray at once joined, and he was one of its most active Fellows until ill health confined him to his house. In the mean time, in 1824, he had become an assistant in the Natural-History Department of the British Museum, of which he was appointed Keeper in 1840, on the resignation of Mr. Children. ith this great national establishment his life has since been inseparably connected. In 1826 he married the widow of his cousin, the only son of Dr. E. W. Gray, his granduncle, a former secretary of the Royal Society ; and this lady, who survives to mourn his loss, assisted him in all his subsequent labours, and is herself the author of the well-known ‘ Figures of Molluscous Animals.’ For more than fifty years Dr. Gray’s life was one of un- ceasing activity. Considerably more than a thousand books, memoirs, and notes on almost all departments of zoology, attest the extraordinary versatility and energy of his mind; and his earliest efforts, when little more than a boy, were devoted to the kindred science of botany, in which he, with the cooperation of his father, was the first to introduce the’ Jussieuan Natural System to English botanists. It may be a question whether his efforts for this purpose, in the ‘ Natural Arrangement of British Plants,’ were not the cause of that ignominious rejection by the Linnean Society of which we have already spoken. But even the exertions necessary to produce the vast mass of written zoological papers which bear his name did not ex- haust his activity ; and we find him showing a strong interest in such varied matters as sanitary and metropolitan improve- ments, education, prison discipline, and the abolition of im- prisonment for debt, the improvement of the treatment of lunatics, and the opening of museums, libraries, picture- galleries, and gardens to the public. Dr. Gray claimed to have been the original proposer of the system of a low uniform rate of postage to be prepaid by stamps—a system carried out by Rowland Hill, and now adopted all over the world. He took much interest in the question of the adoption of a decimal scale of coinage, weights, and measures in this country; and between 1854 and 1857 published numerous articles and pamphlets on this subject. His opinion was that if a decimal system were to be adopted, it should be organized on the principle of making the larger coins decimal multiples of a small existing unit, such as the penny, instead of decimal divisors of a large unit, such as the pound. In considering the immense mass of work published by Dr. Gray, the zoologist may sometimes be inclined to wish that 284 Biographical Notice of the late Dr. J. E. Gray. its amount were less, and that the author had given himself more time for the full elaboration of the various subjects that he took up. In too many instances he hastened to put the results of his researches into shape before he had really com- pleted them ; hence further investigations led him to modify the views which he had expressed only a short time pre- viously, and thus two or three papers on the same subject, perhaps the classification of some tribe or family of animals, would follow each other in rapid succession. it would un- doubtedly have been better, both for zoology and for his own future fame, if the outcome of the same amount of study had been represented by half, or even a quarter, of the amount of literature which now stands in Dr. Gray’s name. But there is one labour of his from which no such deduction is to be made; and it is this especially that will carry his name down the stream of time. From his appointment as an Assistant in the British Museum until the close of his life, but more es- ecially since his having been made Keeper of the Natural- History Department, he devoted himself with unflagging energy to the development of the collection under his charge ; and mainly by his exertions it has grown from the rudimentary state in which it existed in the days of Dr. Leach, to the magnificent proportions which it has now attained. It is impossible to overrate the services rendered to zoology in this country by Dr. Gray in the accumulation of the fine series of specimens now possessed by the British Museum, and the excellent catalogues of several departments prepared by him or under his auspices. His knowledge of species and genera in those groups to which his attention was particularly directed was perhaps unrivalled; his great energy and administrative ability enabled him to carry out the business of his department in the face of difficulties and obstacles which few would have overcome. His great services in this respect met with more direct recognition abroad than in this country: in 1852 he received the honorary degree of Doctor of Philosophy from the University of Munich ; and in 1860 the large Gold Medal of merit was conferred upon him by the King of Wiirttemberg, on his declining the offer of an order of knighthood which had been made to him. His merits were also acknowledged by many foreign Societies and Academies, which enrolled him in the lists of their honorary and corresponding members, The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia i him this honour as early as 1829 ; and he was subsequently elected to analogous positions by scientific bodies in Boston, Moscow, Rome, Paris, Darmstadt, Lyons, Turin, Strasbourg, Lund, and other places. He was also a Fellow or Member of nearly all the Natural-History Societies in London, Bibliographical Notice. 285 We are conscious that these few and imperfect remarks are far from doing justice to the merits of Dr. Gray. For more than fifty years he occupied a position in the first rank of the naturalists of this country, and both in his capacity as Director of the chief zoological collection in Britain and by his personal exertions in various ways, he exercised a widespread influence. He was always ready to facilitate the study of the splendid collections under his charge, and to give advice and assistance to earnest students; and whilst it must be admitted that the shrewdness of his character, which led him to penetrate the hidden motives of men, coupled with an acquired or natural causticity of manner, often raised a prejudice against him, those hs succeeded in getting within the outworks thus raised, found in Dr. Gray a warm-hearted, judicious, kind, and firm friend. BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTICE. Zoology. By Aurrep Newron, M.A., F.R.S. Sm. 8vo. London, 1874. Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge. The Student's Guide to Zoology, a Manual of the Principles of Zoological Science. By Anprew Wirson. Sm. 8yo. London: J. & A. Churchill, 1874. We have already, on more than one occasion, noticed the great fertility of the present day in zoological manuals. Up to within a very few years the student had the choice of two or three English books on the subject, and that was all; now his difficulties must arise solely from an embarras de richesses, seeing that the number and variety of the manuals offered for his selection is so great that he ought to be able to suit himself perfectly, if only he knows how to choose. The two little handbooks of which the titles stand at the head of this article do not profess to furnish a regular system of zoology; they are devoted to the exposition of the principles of the science, or, in other words, the generalization of the results obtained by zoological investigation, to form a basis for future studies. The first of them, by Professor Alfred Newton, is one of a series of shilling ‘ Manuals of Elementary Science’ published by the Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge ; and it reflects high credit both on its author and on the Society under whose auspices it has been produced. The leading branches of zoological study are explained very simply and clearly, and from a really zoological stand-point, by Prof. Newton, whose lessons might, we think, be taken to heart with advantage by many modern naturalists, who would be offended if we made this recommendation to them personally. Starting from a very ingenious comparison between the animal world and a bag of coins, Professor Newton indicates the general principles by which 20 Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Ser.4. Vol. xv. 286 Royal Society :—On the Natiire of the we may recognize the agreements and differences of the various forms ; he then points out the general purposes of classification and the principles of nomenclature, the principles of comparative anatomy and their application to the study of extinct animals, and the general facts of geographical distribution. His third chapter is devoted to a brief sketch of the classification of animals, the fourth to their development and reproduction, and the fifth to certain general observations on the food and instincts of certain species, mimicry, &c. In this chapter also the author discusses the question of the nature and possible origin of species. We most heartily recommend this little volume as a first book of zoology. Mr. Wilson’s work, which carries the teaching much further, and is really a student’s manual, is also an excellent work of its kind. Mr. Wilson covers pretty nearly the same ground as Prof. Newton, although of course he enters into much more detail; and we have to compliment both authors on the same characteristic of their work— namely, the total freedom from prejudice with which they have dis- cussed those unsettled questions which at present divide naturalists, PROCEEDINGS OF LEARNED SOCIETIES. ROYAL SOCIETY. February 4, 1875.—Joseph Dalton Hooker, C.B., President, in the Chair. «* Remarks on Professor Wrvittz Tuomson’s Preliminary Notes on the Nature of the Sea-bottom procured by the Soundings of H.M.S, ‘Challenger.’” By Wirtr1am B. Carrenter, M.D., LL D., F.R.S. The extreme interest of two of the questions started and partly discussed in Professor Wyville Thomson’s communication will be deemed, I trust, a sufficient reason for my offering such contribu- tions as my own experience furnishes towards their solution. The first of these questions is, whether the Globigerine, by the accumulation of whose shells the Globigerina-ooze is being formed on the deep-sea bottom, live and multiply on that bottom, or pass their whole lives in the superjacent water (especially in its upper stratum), only subsiding to the bottom when dead. Having previously held the former opinion, Prof. Wyville Thomson states that he has now been led to adopt the latter, by the results of Mr. Murray’s explorations of the surface and sub- surface waters with the tow-net—which results concur with the previous observations of Miiller, Hickel, Major Owen, and others, in showing that Globigerine, in common with many other Foraminifera, have a pelagic habitat; while the close relation which they further indicate between the surface-fauna of any particular locality and the materials of the organic deposit at the bottom, appears to Prof. Wyville Thomson to warrant the conclusion that the latter is altogether derived from the former. Sea-bottom procured by H.M.S. ‘Challenger.’ 287 Now without in the least degree calling in question the correct- ness of these observations, I venture to submit, first, that they bear a different interpretation, and, second, that this interpretation is required by other facts, of which no account seems to have been taken by Prof. Wyville Thomson and his coadjutor. In this, as in many other instances, I believe it will prove that the truth lies between two extreme views. That the Globigerine live on the bottom only is a position clearly no longer tenable ; but that they live and multiply in the upper waters only, and only sink to the bottom after death, seems to me a position no more tenable than the preceding: and I shall now adduce the evidence which appears tome at present to justify the conclusion (I refrain from expressing myself more positively, because I consider the question still open to investigation), that whilst the Globigerine are pelagic in an earlier stage of their lives, frequenting the upper stratum of the ocean, they sink to the bottom whilst still living, in consequence of the increasing thickness of their calcareous shells, and not only con- tinue to live on the sea-bed, but probably mu/tiply there—perhaps there exclusively. That there is no @ priori improbability in their doing so, is proved by the abundant evidence in my possession of the exis- tence of Foraminiferal life at abyssal depths. The collections made during the ‘ Porcupine’ Expeditions of 1869 and 1870 yielded a large number of those Arenaceous types which construct their “tests” by the cementation of sand-grains only to be obtained on the bottom; and these were almost the only Foraminifera, except Globigerine and Orbuline, which came up in the 2435- fathoms dredging. Again, many Foraminifera, both arenaceous and shelly, were brought up from great depths, attached to shells, stones, &c., that must have lain at the bottom. Further, among the “vitreous” Foraminifera, the most common deep-sea types, except those of the Globigerine family, were Cristellarvans with shells so thick and massive as to be (it may be safely affirmed) incapable of being floated by the animals which form them; while among the “ porcellaneous ” Foraminifera, the Biloculine and Triloculine were equally distinguished by a mas- siveness of shell, which seemed to forbid the idea that they could have floated subsequently to that stage of their lives in which this massiveness had been acquired. Of the existence of living Globigerine in great numbers in the stratum of water immediately above the bottom, at from 500 to 750 fathoms depth, I am able to speak with great positiveness. It several times happened, during the Third Cruise of the ‘ Por- cupine’ in 1869, that the water brought up by the water-bottle from immediately above the Globigerina-ooze was quite turbid ; and this turbidity was found (by filtration) to depend, not upon the suspension of amorphous particles diffused through the water, but upon the presence of multitudes of young Globigerine, which were retained upon the filter, the water passing through it quite clear. The thin shells of these specimens, exhibiting very distinct 20* 288 Royal Society :—On the Nature of the pseudopodial orifices, contrasted strongly with the larger and thicker shells of the specimens brought up by the sounding- apparatus from the bottom immediately beneath, in which the shells were thick and those orifices obscure. It is obvious that if this extraordinary abundance of Globigerine life in the bottom- water was the result of subsidence from the surface or sub-surface stratum, and was merely preparatory to the deposition of the shells on the sea-bed, there should have been a correspondence in size and condition between the floating shells and those lying on the bottom immediately beneath them; whereas no contrast could be more complete, the impression given by the superficial aspects they respectively presented haying been fully confirmed by sub- sequent careful investigation. Prof. Wyville Thomson and Mr. Murray, who notice this con- trast, attribute it to the death of the shells which have subsided to the bottom—being apparently unaware that the observations of Dr. Wallich, with which my own are in entire accordance, leave no reasonable ground for doubt that it is a consequence of their continued life. For it is clearly shown, by making thin trans- parent sections of the thick-shelled Globigerine (an operation which needs a dexterity only to be acquired by long practice, and which is much facilitated by an ingenious device invented by Dr. “Wallich *), that the change of external aspect is due to the remarkable exogenous deposit (a rudiment of the ‘intermediate skeleton” of higher Foraminifera) which is formed, after the full growth of the Globigerina has been attained, upon the outside of the proper chamber-wall—so completely masking its pseudopodial orifices, that Prof. Huxley at one time denied their existence. This deposit is not only many times thicker than the original chamber- wall, but it often contains flask-shaped cavities opening from the exterior, and containing sarcode prolonged into it from the sarcodie investment of the shell. [lustrations of this curious structure are given by Dr. Wallich in figs. 17 and 18 of plate vi. of his ‘ North- Atlantic Sea-bed;’ and I here subjoin a representation of it, Section of Shell of Globigerina, showing the distinction between the original proper wall of the chambers and the secondary exogenous de- posit, with the flask-shaped cavities in the latter opening externally and containing sarcode like that which fills the chambers. kindly given me by Dr. Wallich twelve years ago, which further * Ann, & Mag. of Natural History, 1861, viii. p. 58. Sea-bottom procured by H.M.S. ‘Challenger. 289 shows that the specimen from which it was taken had both its chambers and the flask-shaped cavities of the exogenous deposit filled with sarcode not distinguishable in any respect from that of the floating specimens. From these important observations (which had not been made public when the sheet of my ‘ Introduction to the Study of the Foraminifera’ comprising the Globigerine family passed through the press, but which I have myself subsequently confirmed in every particular) it seems an almost inevitable in- ference that the subsidence of the Globigerine to the bottom is the consequence, not of their death, but of the increasing thickness and weight of their shells, produced by living action. As long as the number of segments continues to increase, the carbonate of lime separated by the sarcodic body from the cireumambient water goes to form the walls of additional chambers; but when this chamber-formation ceases (which usually occurs when the shell consists of either 12 or 16 segments), it is applied to thicken the walls of the chambers already formed; and from the rapid subsidence of the Globigerine taken up from the sea-bottom when thrown into a jar of sea-water, it seems to me inconceivable that they can be floated by their animal inhabitants when once the exogenous deposit has attained any considerable thickness. That the Globigerine which have subsided to the bottom con- tinue to live there, is further indicated by the condition of the sarcodic contents of their shells. In any sample of Globigerina- ooze that I have seen brought up by the dredge or the sounding- apparatus, part of the shells (presumably those of the surface- layer) were filled with a sarcode body corresponding in condition with that of Foraminifera known to live on the sea-bed, and retaining the characteristic form of the organism after the re- moval of the shell by dilute acid. As Dr. Wallich pointed out (‘ North-Atlantic Sea-bed, p. 139), the sarcode of these is viscid, and inclined to coalesce again when crushed ; the shell has a vivid but light burnt-sienna colour ; and sarcodic bosses, like retracted pseudopodia, are distinguishable upon its exterior. The only mis- giving I ever had in regard to the living condition of the Globi- gerine presenting these characters, was caused by the absence of any pseudopodial extensions; and this source of doubt has been now removed by the statement of Prof. Wyville Thomson, that no pseudopodia have ever been observed by Mr. Murray to be put forth by the Globigerine captured in surface-waters.—In the same sample will be found shells distinguishable from the preceding by their dingy look and greyish colour, by the want of consistence and viscidity in their sarcode contents, and by the absence of any external sarcodic investment; these are presumably dead. Other shells, again, are entirely empty; and even when the surface- stratum is formed of perfect Globigerine, the character of the deposit soon changes as it is traced downwards. ‘The sedi- ment,” as was correctly stated by Prof. Wyville Thomson, “ gra- dually becomes more compact; and a slight grey colour (due, probably, to the decomposing organic matter) becomes more pro- 290 Royal Society :—On the Nature of the nounced, while perfect shells of Globigerina almost disappear, fragments become smaller, and caleareous mud, structureless and in a fine state of division, is in greatly preponderating proportion” (‘Depths of the Sea, p. 410). These facts seem to me to mark yery strongly the distinction between the living surface-layer and the dead sub-surface layer, and to show that there is nothing in the condition of the Deep Sea that is likely to prevent or even to retard the decomposition of the dead sarcode bodies of Globigerine. We know that oxygen is present in Oceanic water, even to its abyssal depths, in sufficient proportion for the maintenance of animal life; and what suffices for this, must be adequate to promote the decomposition of organic matter. There is, moreover, a significant indication of the undecomposed condition of the sarcode bodies of the Globigerine of the surface-layer, in the fact that they serve as food to various higher animals which live on the same bottom. This was first pointed out by Dr. Wallich, who found that the contents of the stomachs of the Ophiocome brought up in his 1260-fathoms sounding consisted of a number of fresh- looking Globigerine more or less broken up, minute yellow amor- phous particles, and a few oil-globules (‘ North-Atlantic Sea-bed,’ p. 145). And I have subsequently verified his statement in many other cases *. It seems to me clear, from the foregoing facts, that the onus probandi rests on those who maintain that the Globigerine do not live on the bottom; and such proof is altogether wanting. The most cogent evidence in favour of that proposition would be furnished by the capture, floating in the upper waters, of the large thick-shelled specimens which are at present only known as having been brought up from the sea-bed. And the capture of such specimens would only prove that even in this condition the Globigerine can float; it would not show that they cannot also live on the bottom. That the Globigerine not only live, but propagate, on the Sea- bottom, is indicated by the presence (as already stated) of enor- mous multitudes of very young specimens in the water immediately overlying it. And thus all we at present know of the life-history of this most important type seems to lead to the conclusion, that whilst in the earlier stages of their existence they are inhabitants of the upper waters, they sink to the bottom on reaching adult age, in consequence of the increasing thickness of their shells, that they propagate there (whether by gemmation or sexual generation is not known), and that the young, rising to the surface, repeat the same history. I now proceed to show that the relation between the surface- fauna and the bottom-deposit is by no means so constant as Prof. Wyville Thomson and Mr. Murray affirm it to be. * Thus Man indirectly draws sustenance from the Globigerine; for the Cod which he fishes on the Faroe Banks chiefly live on the Ophiocome which swarm there, these again on the Globigerine, whilst the Globigerine seem to draw their sustenance from the organic matter uniyersally diffused through sea- water, making it a very dilute broth! Sea-bottom procured by H.M.S. ‘Challenger, 291 It may be taken as proved that there is no want of Foramini- feral life in the Mediterranean. Prof. W. C. Williamson long ago pointed out that the “white mud” of the Levant is mainly a Foraminiferal deposit ; I found a similar mud covering the bottom along the Tripoli coast; Mr. J. Gwyn Jeffreys has dredged Fora- minifera in abundance in the Bay of Spezzia, Captain Spratt in the Agean, Oscar Schmidt in the Adriatic, and I myself at various points in the Western basin along the northern coast of Africa. That Foraminifera, especially Globigerine, abound in its surface- water at Messina, is testified by Hiickel in the passage cited by Prof. Wyville Thomson; and when it is considered how large an influx of Atlantic water is constantly entering through the Straits of Gibraltar, and is being diffused throughout the Mediterranean basin, and how favourable is its temperature-condition, it can scarcely be doubted that, if the doctrine now upheld by Prof. Wyville Thomson were correct, the deposit of Globigerina-shells over the whole bottom-area ought to be as abundant as it is in the Atlantic under corresponding latitudes. Yet I found the deeper bottoms, from 300 fathoms downwards, entirely desti- tute of Globigerine as of higher forms of animal life; and this was not my own experience only, but was also that of Oscar Schmidt, who made a similar exploration of the Adriatic. In my first visit to the Mediterranean, in the ‘ Porcupine’ (1870), many hundredweight of the fine mud brought up by the dredge from great depths in the Western basin were laboriously sifted, and the siftings carefully examined, without bringing to light more than a stray drift-shell here and there. And in my second visit, in the ‘ Shearwater’ (1871), I examined all the samples of bottom brought up by the sounding-apparatus from great depths in the Eastern basin, with the same result—giving all the more care to this examination, because Capt. Nares (probably through not having kept separate in his mind the results of the deeper and of the shallower soundings which he had previously made in the Medi- terranean) assured me that I should tind minute shells imbedded in the mud. I can see no other way of accounting for the absence of Globi- gerina-ooze from the bottom of the Mediterranean, save on its shallow borders, than by attributing it to the unfavourable nature of the influences affecting the bottom-life of this basin—that is to say, the gradual settling-down of the fine sedimentary deposit which forms the layer of inorganic mud everywhere spread over its deeper bottom, and the deficiency of oxygen and excess of carbonic acid which I have shown to prevail in its abyssal waters giving them the character of a stagnant pool—these influences acting either singly or in combination. Another fact of which Prof. Wyville Thomson is fully cogni- zant, and to which he formerly attached considerable importance as indicative of the bottom-life of the Globigerine, is unnoticed in his recent communication: I refer to the singular limitation _ of the Globigerina-ooze to the “ warm area” of the sea-bed between 292 Royal Society :—On the Nature of the the North of Scotland and the Faroe Islands. It will be recol- lected by those who have read my ‘ Lightning’ and ‘ Porcupine’ Reports on the exploration of this region, that whilst the whole upper stratum, from the surface to a depth of from 100 to 150 fathoms, has the temperature of the warm flow coming up from the S.W., and whilst this temperature falls so gradually in the *‘ warm area” with increase of depth as to be still as high as 43° Fahr. at a depth of 600 fathoms, it falls so suddenly in the “cold area” between 150 and 300 fathoms, that the whole of its deeper stratum has a temperature below 32°, the bottom tempera- ture descending in some parts to 29°'5. Now on this “ cold area” I never found a single Globiyerina, the bottom consisting of sand and gravel, and the Foraminifera brought up from it being almost exclusively those which form arenaceous tests. The “warm area,” on the other hand, is covered with Globigerina-ooze to an unknown depth, its surface-stratum being composed of perfect shells filled with sarcode, whilst its deeper layers are amorphous. Near the junction of the two areas, but still within the thermal limit of the “ warm,” sand and Globigerina-ooze are mingled—this being peculiarly noticeable on the ‘ Holtenia-ground,” which yielded a large proportion of our most noteworthy captures in this locality. Now, if the bottom-deposit is dependent on the life of the surface- stratum, why should there be this complete absence of Globigerina- ooze over the “cold area,” the condition of the surface-stratum being everywhere the same? I was myself formerly disposed to attribute it to the depression of bottom-temperature ; but as it has now been proved by the ‘Challenger’ observations in the Atlantic that Globigerina-ooze prevails over. areas whose bottom-tempera- ture is but little above 32°, this explanation can no longer be accepted. And I can see no other way of accounting for it than by attributing it to the drift of the cold underflow, carying away the Globigerine that are subsiding through it towards the deep basin of the Atlantic, into which I believe that underflow to discharge itself. Prof. Wyville Thomson, however, denies any sensible movement to this underflow, continuing to speak of it as ‘ banked up” by the Gulf-stream*, which here (according to him) has a depth of 700 fathoms; and this very striking example of want of conformity between the surface-fauna and the bottom-deposit consequently remains to be accounted for on his hypothesis. The other of Prof. Wyville Thomson’s principal conclusions, as to which I have rather a suggestion to offer than an objection to take, relates to the origin of the “red clay” which he found * See his ‘Depths of the Sea,’ p. 400. That there is a lateral pressure of the one flow against the other, just as there is a lateral pressure of the Labrador Current against the Gulf-stream on the North-American coast (pro- ducing the well-known “ cold wall ’’), is sufficiently obvious from their relative distribution on the bottom of the channel. But it seems to me perfectly clear that the effect of this pressure is simply to narrow the glacial flow, and at the same time to increase its velocity. The most westerly point to which we traced it was near the edge of the Faroe Banks ; and there (as Prof. Wyville Thomson himself pointed out to me at the time) the movement of the bottom-water was ao i Sea-bottom procured by H.M.S. ‘Challenger.’ 293 covering large areas in the Atlantic, and met with also between Kerguelen’s Island and Melbourne. Into this red clay he describes the Globigerina-ooze as graduating through the “ grey ooze ;” and he aflirms this transition to be essentially dependent on the depth of the bottom. “Crossing,” he says, ‘‘ from these shallower regions occupied by the ooze into deeper soundings, we find univer- sally that the calcareous formation gradually passes into, and is replaced by, an extremely pure clay, which occupies, speaking generally, all depths below 2500 fathoms, and consists almost en- tirely of a silicate of the red oxide of iron and alumina. ..... The mean maximum depth at which the Globigerina-ooze occurs may be taken at about 2250 fathoms; the mean depth at which we find the transition grey ooze is 2400 fathoms; and the mean depth of the red-clay soundings is about 2700 fathoms. ...... We were at length able,” he continues, “ to predict the nature of the bottom from the depth of the soundings with absolute certainty for the Atlantic and the Southern Sea.” And from these data he considers it an indubitable inference “that the red clay is essentially the insoluble residue, the ash, as it were, of the calcareous or- ganisms which form the Globigerina-ooze after the calcareous mat- ter has been by some means removed.” This inference he considers to have been confirmed by the analysis of several samples of Globigerina-ooze, “always with the result that,a small proportion of a red sediment remains, which possesses all the characters of the red clay.” Prof. Wyville Thomson further suggests that the removal of the calcareous matter may be due to the presence of an excess of carbonic acid in the bottom-waters, and to the derivation of this water in great part from circumpolar freshwater ice, so that, being comparatively free from carbonate of lime, its solvent power for that substance is greater than that of the superjacent waters of the ocean. He might have added probability to his hypothesis if he had cited the observations of Mr. Sorby as to the increase of sol- vent power for carbonate of lime possessed by water under greatly augmented pressure*. Greatly struck with the ingenuity of this hypothesis, I turned to Prof. Wyville Thomson’s tabular statement of the facts in detail, and must own to a great feeling of surprise at the want of con- formity of these details with the assertions of universality and certainty of prediction which I have italicized in the above extracts, evidenced by the rounding into pebbles of what was elsewhere angular gravel. But it is even more conclusively shown by a comparison of the two serial soundings taken in the “cold area” (Nos. 52 and 64), which proves that the glacial stratum flows up a slope in the former position (just as the cold under- stratum does in the Florida Channel), which it could not do unless it were in movement. That we did not trace the outflow of this cold stream into the great basin of the Atlantic, was simply, as I believe, because we were prevented from ascertaining the bottom-temperature on the line which I expected that flow to take after surmounting the ridge. * Proceedings of the Royal Society, vol. xii. p. 538. 294 _ Royal Society :—On the Nature of the Thus in the deepest sounding in the whole Atlantie (that of 3875 fathoms, taken on the voyage from St. Thomas to Bermuda), as well as in the next two soundings of 2960 and 2800 fathoms respectively (the average of the three being 3211 fathoms), the bottom was ‘“ grey ooze ;” whilst in the next three soundings of 2850, 2700, and 2600 fathoms respectively (the average of the three being 2716 fathoms, or nearly 400 fathoms less than the preceding) the bottom was of “red clay.” Between Bermuda and the Azores, again, there were six successive soundings between 2700 and 2875 fathoms, in which the bottom was ‘ grey ooze.” It is clear, then, that no constant relation exists between depth and the nature of the bottom. If not only eight ordinary sound- ings whose average was almost exactly 2800 fathoms, but the ex- traordinarily deep sounding of 3875 fathoms, gave a bottom of “ orey ooze,” it surely cannot be “ an ascertained fact that wherever the depth increases from about 2200 to 2600 fathoms, the modern chalk formation of the Atlantic and other oceans passes into a clay.” Now, if this “ red clay” had the character of an ordinary river- silt, it would be quite conformable to my Mediterranean experience to regard it (as Prof. Wyville Thomson himself was at first disposed to do) in the light of a derivative from the land, diffused through the ocean-water and slowly settling down over particular areas, to which it might be determined by the prevalent direction of the bottom-flow, which would greatly depend in its turn upon the ridge-and-valley conformation of the sea-bed. And the presence of a small proportion of this material in the ordinary Globigerina-ooze, whilst, where it is deposited in quantity, there are neither entire Globigerine nor their disintegrated remains, would be perfectly con- sistent with the known destructive effect of the slow subsidence of a muddy sediment on many forms of animal life*. But I agree with Prof. Wyville Thomson in thinking that the remarkable uniformity of this deposit, coupled with its peculiar composition, indicates a different derivation ; and the suggestion I have to offer is based on its near relation in composition, notwith- standing its great difference in appearance, to G/auconite—the mineral of which the green sands that occur in various geological formations are for the most part composed, and which is a silicate of peroxide of iron and alumina. It is well known that Prof. Ehrenberg, in 18537, drew atten- tion to the fact that the grains of these green sands are for the most part, if not entirely, internal casts of Foraminifera—the sarcodic bodies of the animals having been replaced by glauconite, and the calcareous shells subsequently got rid of, either by abrasion or by some solvent which does not attack their contents. It was soon afterwards shown by Prof. Bailey (U. 8.) that in certain localities * See my ‘Shearwater’ Report in Proceed. Roy. Soc. 1872, vol. xx. p. 584. t “ Ueber den Griinsand und seine Erliuterung, etec.,” in Abhandl. der kénig]. Akad. der Wissensch. zu Berlin, 1855, p. 85. Sea-bottom procured by H.M.S. ‘Challenger.’ 295 a like replacement is going on at the present time, the chambers of recent Foraminifera being occasionally found to be occupied by nineral deposit, which, when the shell has been dissolved away by dilute acid, presents a perfect internal cast of its cavities. By the application of this method to Mr. Beete Jukes’s Australian dredgings, my coadjutors, Messrs. W. K. Parker and 'T. Rupert Jones, obtained a series of internal casts of most wonderful beauty and completeness, on which I have based my interpretation of the organic structure of Hozoon canadense. Having myself examined in the same manner a portion of the Foraminiferal sand dredged by Capt. Spratt in the A¢gean (Kindly placed in my hands by Mr. J. Gwyn Jeffreys), 1 have found that it yielded a great variety of these beautiful models, not only of the bodies of Foraminifera, but also of the sarcodic network which interpenetrates the calcareous network of the shell and spines of Echinida*. Alike in Mr. Jukes’s and in Capt. Spratt’s dredgings, some of these casts are in green silicates and some in ochreous, corresponding precisely to the two kinds of fossil casts described by Prof. Ehren- berg. The difference 1 presume to depend upon the degree of oxidation of the iron; but as these casts are far too precious to be sacrificed for chemical analysis, I cannot speak with certainty on this point. As it is only in certain limited areas of the sea-bottom that this replacement of the sarcodic bodies of Foraminifera by mineral deposit is met with, it has always seemed to me next to certain that there must be some peculiarity in the composition of the sea- water of those areas (produced, perhaps, by the outburst of sub- marine springs highly charged with ferruginous silicates) which gives to them a capability that does not exert itself elsewhere ; and this now seems yet more probable from the circumstance that, notwithstanding the vast extent over which the ‘ Challenger’ soundings and dredgings have been prosecuted, only two or three cases of the kind have been noted—those, namely, of the “ green- ish sands” brought up from 98 and 150 fathoms in the region of the Agulhas Current and in one or two other localities. 1t is a fact of peculiar interest, moreover, that the calcareous shells’ should have here disappeared, just as they have done in ordinary green-sand—and this, too, although the depth was so small as altogether to forbid the idea that their disappearance is due to any solvent process brought about by the agencies to which Prof, Wyville thomson attributes the remoyal of the calcareous deposit generated by Globigerine life. Now, in the residue lett after the decalcification of Capt. Spratt’s dredgings, I noticed a number of small particles of red clay, some of them presenting no definite shape, whilst others approximated sulliciently closely in form and size to the green and ochreous * Of these I hope to be able, ere long, to give a detailed account, in illus- tration of the similar models of the animal of Zozoon obtained by the decalci- fication of its serpentine lamelli. a 296 | Royal Society :-— “internal casts” to induce me to surmise that these also had been originally deposited in the chambers of Foraminifera—their mate- rial being probably very nearly the same, although its state of gregation is different. And it this was their real origin, I should be disposed to extend the same view to the red clay of the ‘ Chal- lenger’ soundings ; for a strong @ priori improbability in the sup- position that this is the “ash” of the shells themselves is created by the fact that we have no knowledge (so far as I am aware) of the presence of any such ash in calcareous organisms of similar grade. It is certainly not proved by the analyses of Globigerina- ooze quoted by Prof. Wyville Thomson, since this (supposing it to be free from any extraneous admixture) may have contained many shells partially or completely filled with such deposit. The only analysis that could prove it would be either that of shells of floating Globigerine, which may be presumed to be alive, or of those found in the surface-layer of the Globigerina-ooze, which (whether living or dead) have their chambers filled with sarcode. I submit, then, that if the red clay is (as I am disposed to be- lieve) a derivative of the Globigerina-ooze, its production is more probably due to a post mortem deposit in the chambers of the Foraminifera than to the appropriation of its material by the living animals in the formation of their shells. That deposit may have had the character, in the first instance, of either the green or the ochreous silicate of alumina and iron, which constitutes the material of the internal casts, and may have been subsequently changed in its character by a metamorphic action analogous to that which changes felspar into clay. That the presence of an excess of carbonic acid would have an important share in such a metamor- phosis appears from the fact, long since brought into notice by Sir Charles Lyell*, of the disintegration of the granite in Auvergne and of the gneiss in the alluvial plains of the Po where subject to its influence. And the same agency (especially when operating under great pressure) would be fully competent to effect the re- moval of the calcareous shells, as was distinctly pointed out nearly thirty years ago by Prof. W. C. Williamson in his classical memoir on the Microscopic Organisms of the Levant Mudt. ‘This seems to me the most probable mode of accounting for their disappear- ance from a deep-sea deposit, where no mechanical cause can be invoked. But in shallower waters, where the same excess of carbonic acid does not exist, and the aid of pressure is wanting, but where a movement of water over the bottom is produced by tides and currents, | am disposed rather to attribute the disappearance of the shells to mechanical abrasion, having noticed, in Capt. Spratt’s Augean dredgings, that many of the shells were worn so thin that the coloured mineral deposit in their interior could be seen through them—which was, in fact, what first drew my atten- tion to its presence. This is the explanation I should be disposed * Principles of Geology, 11th ed., vol. i. p. 409. t Memoirs of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester, vol. viii. p. 98. On the Structure and Development of Myriothela. 297 to give of the disappearance of the shells from the green sand brought up by the ‘Challenger’ in the course of the Agulhas Current ; but whether it was mechanical abrasion or chemical solution that removed the Foraminiferal shells whose internal casts formed the Greensand deposit of the Cretaceous epoch, must remain for the present an open question*, February 11, 1875.—Joseph Dalton Hooker, C.B., President, in the Chair. * On the Structure and Development of Myriothela.” By Prof. Atrman, F-.R.S. The endoderm of the body is composed of numerous layers of large spherical cells composed of clear protoplasm, enclosing a nucleus with some brown granules and refringent corpuscles. Externally it is continued in an altered form into the tentacles, while internally it forms long thick villus-like processes which project into the cavity of the body. Towards the free ends of these processes there are abundantly developed among the large clearer cells, smaller, easily isolated spherical cells, filled with opaque brown granules. Where the endoderm passes into the tentacles it loses its large clear-celled condition, and consists of small round cells, so loaded with opaque granules that the axis of the tentacle appears nearly white under reflected light. The free surface of the endoderm carries, at intervals, long, very slender, sluggishly vibrating cilia, and is overlaid with a thin layer of homogeneous protoplasm, which on the villus-like processes becomes especially distinct, and which here develops minute mutable pseudo- podia, which are being constantly projected and withdrawn. Indeed the vibratile cilia appear to be but a modification of these pseudo- podial processes of protoplasm. Interposed between the endoderm and the ectoderm is the Sibrillated layer. It is extremely well developed, and consists of longitudinal muscular fibrille, closely adherent to the outer sur- face of a structureless hyaline membrane—the “ Stiitzlamelle” of Reichert. The fibrillated layer, with its supporting membrane, is so strong as to remain entire in a section of the animal after the tissues on both sides of it have been broken down. The ectoderm is composed of two zones, a superficial and a deep. The superficial zone consists mainly of two or three layers of small round cells containing yellowish granules. Among these cells the thread-cells may be seen, lying chiefly near the outer surface of the body. Two forms of thread-cells may be here di- * It is due to Prof. W. C. Williamson to point out that, in the Memoir already referred to, he indicated the probability “that many of our European Greensands, and other siliceous strata, however barren of such structures they appear, may have once contained multitudes of caleareous microscopic organisms, some of which have been removed after the consolidation of the strata, either leaving hollow casts, or having had the cayities subsequently filled with silica.” 298 Royal Society :-— stinguished—one ovate, with the invaginated tube occupying the axis; the other fusiform, with the invaginated tube oblique. The deeper zone of the ectoderm consists of a very remarkable tissue, composed of peculiar membraneless cells, each of which is prolonged into a tail-like process, so that the cells assume a clavi- form shape. In most situations, where this tissue is developed, the processes from several such cells unite with one another, so as to form branching, somewhat botrylliform groups, whose common stalk can be followed into the fibrillated layer. The author is thus enabled so far to confirm the observations of Kleinenberg on cells of apparently the same significance in Hydra, In Myriothela, however, these cells do not, as in Hydra, reach the surface. With the exception, apparently, of their condition in the transitory arms of the Actinula or locomotive embryo, they form everywhere a dee zone interposed between the muscular layer and the atipcuiielge layer of the ectoderm. This zone is designated by the author as the zone of claviform tissue. Though it is in intimate association with the fibrillated layer, the author did not succeed in tracing a direct continuity of the individual fibrille with the processes of the cells (as described by Kleinenberg in Hydra). The author adopts, as a probable hypothesis, the views of Kleinenberg respecting the caudate cells of Hydra, which he regards as representing a nervous system. While the deep layer of ectodermal cells in Myriothela would thus constitute a nervous layer, the superficial layer would represent an epidermis; and since recent researches justify us in regarding the ectoderm and endoderm of the Celenterata as respectively representing in a permanent condition the upper and lower leaf of the blastoderm in the development of the higher animals, we should thus find Myriothela offering no exception to the general Jaw, which derives both epidermic and neryous tissues from the upper leaf of the blastoderm. The structure of the tentacles is in the highest degree interesting. In their narrow stalk-like portion, the condition of the endoderm departs widely from that of this tissue in the tentacles of other marine hydroids ; for it presents no trace of the septate disposition so well marked in these. It is, on the contrary, composed of a layer of small cells loaded with opaque granules and surrounding a continuous wide axile cavity. It is, however, in the terminal capitulum of tho tentacle that the structure of these organs departs most widely from any thing that has as yet been recognized in the tentacles of other hydroids. Here a very peculiar tissue is developed between the muscular layer and the proper ectoderm, where it takes the place of the zone of claviform tissue. It forms a thick hemispherical cap over the muscular lamella and endoderm of the tentacle, and is composed of closely applied exceedingly slender prisms, with their inner ends resting on the muscular lamella, to which the prisms are perpen- dicular, the whole structure forcibly suggesting the rod-like tissue associated with special sense-apparatus in higher animals. It On the Structure and Development of Myriothela. 299 appears to be but a modification of the tissue which elsewhere forms the zone of claviform tissue. Extending in a radiating direction from the convex surface of this rod-like tissue, towards the external surface ef the tentacle, may be seen numerous firm filaments, each of which, making its way among cells of the ectoderm, terminates distally in a very delicate transparent oviform sac, which carries, near its distal end, a minute styliform process. Within this sac, and completely filling it, is an oviform capsule with firm transparent walls, and haying immersed in its clear refringent contents a cylindrical cord wound upon itself in two or three coils. Under pressure, the contained cord may be sometimes forced out through the smaller or distal end of the capsule. Notwithstanding the obvious resemblance of these bodies to thread-cells, their significance is, without doubt, something entirely different. Indeed their re- semblance to the Pacinian bodies of Vertebrata is too strong to be overlooked. Their assemblage constitutes a zone parallel to the spherical surface of the capitulum, and lying at a slight distance within it. ‘Though it is impossible to assign to them, with cer- tainty, their exact function, we feel compelled to regard the whole system, including the bacillar tissue to which their stalks can be traced (and which is only a locally modified portion of the nervous zone, or zone of claviform tissue), as an apparatus of sense. It would almost seem to represent a form of sense-organ, in which sight and touch show themselves in one of their earliest phylogenetic stages, in which they have not yet become fully differentiated from one another. This is the only known instance of the existence in a hydroid trophosome of any thing which may with fair reason be regarded as a special apparatus of sense. The male and female sporosacs are borne by the same tropho- some. The generative elements, whether male or female, originate in a special cavity (gonogenetic chamber), which is formed in the sub- stance of the endoderm of the sporosac. In the female, the primitive plasma becomes gradually differen- tiated into a multitude of cell-like bodies having all the characters of true ova with their germinal vesicle and spot. They are en- tirely destitute of enveloping membrane. These bodies next begin to coalesce with one another into numerous roundish masses of protoplasm, which develop over their surface minute pseudopodial retractile processes. The masses thus formed still further coalesce with one another; and there results a single spheroidal plasma-mass, through which are dispersed numerous small spherical vesicles, mostly provided with anucleus. These vesicles appear to be nothing more than the nucleolated nuclei of the coalesced ovum-like cells. About the time of the completion of this last coalescence, the resulting plasma-mass, enveloped in an external, very delicate, structureless membrane, is expelled, by the contraction of the spo- rosac, through an aperture formed by rupture in its summit. 300 Miscellaneous. Immediately after its expulsion, it is seized, in a manner which forcibly suggests the supposed action of the Fallopian tube on the mammalian ovum at the moment of its escape from the Graafian follicle, by the sucker-like extremities of certain remarkable bodies, to which the author gives the name of claspers, which are developed among the blastostyles, and resemble long filiform and very con- tractile tentacles. It is apparently now that fecundation is effected ; for the plasma becomes again resolved into a multitude of roundish masses. This phenomenon may be regarded as representing the yelk- cleavage of an ordinary ovum. Reasons are assigned for believing that it is through the agency of the claspers that fecundation takes place ; and the claspers are compared to the hectocotylus of Cepha- lopods, and to certain organs by which fecundation is effected among the Alge. The mulberry-like mass thus formed, surrounded by its struc- tureless membrane, which has now acquired considerable thickness and forms a firm capsule, continues to be held in the grasp of the claspers during certain subsequent stages of its development. An endoderm and ectoderm with a true multicellular structure become differentiated, a central cavity is formed by excavation, and the germ becomes thus converted into a spheroidal non-ciliated Pla- nula. This, after acquiring certain external appendages, ultimately escapes, by the rupture of the capsule, as a free actinuloid embryo. The actinuloid, on its escape from its capsule, is provided not only with the long arms already noticed by Cocks and Alder, but with short scattered clavate tentacles. The short clavate tentacles become the permanent tentacles of the fully developed hydroid ; the long arms, on the other hand, are purely embryonic and transi- tory. The long embryonic arms originate in the spheroidal Planula. They are formed by a true invagination, and at first grow inwards into the body-cavity of the Planula. It is only just before the escape of the actinuloid from its capsule that they evaginate them- selves and become external. After enjoying its free existence for one or two days, during which it moves about by the aid of its long arms, the embryo fixes itself by its proximal end, the long arms gradually disappear, the short permanent tentacles increase in number, and the essential form of the adult is soon acquired. MISCELLANEOUS. On Pinaxia. By Enear A. Suitn, F.Z.8., Zoological Department, British Museum. Tuis genus was formed by Mr. A. Adams (Proc. Zool. Soc. 1853, p- 185) for the reception of a little shell said to have been found at the Philippine Islands by Mr. Cuming, and described under the Miscellaneous. 301 name of P. coronata on the same page, and figured in the ‘Genera of Recent Mollusca’ by Messrs. H. and A. Adams on pl. xiv. fig. 1. Mr. E. W. H. Holdsworth has recently presented to the British Museum a series of shells which he had collected in Ceylon; and among them are three specimens of Pinazia, two of which have the operculum preserved. It is horny, stained with pinkish colour, and of the usual form that obtains among the Purpyrine, and thus shows that this genus has been rightly located by the above authors, The small transverse plaits on the columella (about six in number) appear to exist only in the adult shell ; and the same remark applies to the fine lirations within the aperture. In a variety from the Sandwich Islands the coronation which edges the spire in the typical form is totally wanting, the general form is more bulbous, and the spiral lirations are but slightly raised. The deciduous epidermis is villose and of a pale olive colour. In 1839, in the ‘ Zoology of Beechey’s Voyage,’ p. 114, Dr. Gray described a shell from the Pacific Ocean under the name of Pyrula versicolor. The description is excellent; but by an oversight or printer’s error, the colour is stated to be “bright crimson,” which no doubt should have been bright orange. The specimen from which the description was taken, although a large one, is not adult; and consequently the character of the plaits on the columella is not mentioned. Taking these two circumstances into consideration, I think it will be advisable to adopt the more recent name coronata. Perhaps this may be a fitting opportunity to acquaint concholo- gists that one of the last, and not least, of the innumerable acts of generosity of the late deeply lamented Dr. Gray was the presentation by him to the British Museum of his private collection of shells. How valuable an acquisition to the National Collection this is will at once be acknowledged, as it comprises a large number of types of his species which were described many years ago in the Zoology of ‘ Beechey’s Voyage, Griffith’s edition of Cuvier’s ‘Animal King- dom,’ the ‘Annals and Magazine of Natural History,’ the ‘Zoological Journal,’ the ‘ Zoological Miscellany,’ &c. A number of these species are but briefly characterized and unfigured ; so that in the present state of conchological science it is almost impossible to recognize them, at least with any degree of certainy, except by comparison with the actual types. Thus the value of the collection becomes greatly enhanced. On the general Phenomena of the Embryogeny of the Nemertians. By M. J. Barros. Amongst the numerous obstacles which one encounters at each step in researches in embryogeny, there is none more serious than that presented by the multiplicity of the larval forms in the same group of animals. These divergences, often very great in the first stages of development, prevent us from taking these as a starting- point in the appreciation of the subsequent phenomena: conse- Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Ser. 4. Vol. xv. 21 302 Miscellaneous. quently any deduction drawn from the mode of development becomes impossible, and embryogeny (that powerful aid to anatomy) seems to fail entirely. It is therefore of the greatest importance to obtain a knowledge of the mutual relations which unite these different larval forms. It is thus that Fritz Miiller has shown, by the embryogeny of Peneus, the bonds which unite the Nauplius and the Zoéa. Of all the groups which present this mode of complication, the Nemertians certainly show one of the most remarkable cases. Side by side with the form Pilidiwm, which constitutes one of the most typical examples of geneagenesis, numerous larve oceur, which, without any analogous phenomenon, pass directly to the adult state. On the one hand we have a transparent animal furnished with elegant extensions and ciliated bands, which the older observers very naturally compared to the well-known larvee of the Echinoderms. From this first sketch originates, by internal budding, the future Vemertes, which, as soon as it is formed, quits its nurse to live an independent life. On the other hand, again, we see a small ciliated very simple larva issue from the egg, a simple oval body, differing but little in appearance from the egg which gave it birth (the larva of Desor), and which, without any other perceptible phenomenon except a mere differentiation of tissues, is gradually transformed into a complete Nemertes. During a residence of several months last summer at the Zoolo- gical Laboratory of Wimereux, directed by Professor Giard, I was enabled to study this question in a connected manner ; and it is the results of my researches on this subject that I have the honour of: communicating to the Academy. Together with a great number of unimportant forms of the larve of Desor, which reach their complete development gradually with- out presenting any abnormal phenomenon, I had the good fortune. to meet with some forms of great interest, which, besides a great number of very instructive facts, have furnished me with the transition term between the two modes of development, so different in appearance, the Pilidium and the larva of Desor. Among all the species which I have observed, the most remarkable is without question a species very common at Wimereux, and which I have been able to follow in a very detailed manner in all the phases of its evolution, namely Nemertes communis (Van Bened.). Although reproducing in its development all the essential peculi-- arities which characterize the Pilidium, this species presents a very marked approach towards the simpler states, and offers incontestable analogies to the larva of Desor. I reserve for a more extended memoir the details relating to the very curious processes which give origin to the various systems of organs of the Nemertians ; I only desire now to call attention to a main point, the passage from the Pilidiwm to the larva of Desor. It is known, from the recent researches of Kowaleysky and Metschnikoff, that in the Nemertes with a Pilidiwm the spheres of segmentation of the egg arrange themselves very early radiately around a central cavity, which is at first very, small; this latter Miscellaneous. 303 enlarges rapidly and drives all the cells towards the periphery, so as to constitute a superficial membrane. There is thus produced a closed vesicle, with the wall formed of a single series of cells (blas- tosphera). This vesicle becomes invaginated and gives origin to a double-walled sac (Gastrula) ; it is at this stage that hatching takes place. The Gastrula breaks through the vitelline membrane and begins to swim freely in the liquid. Then commences an interruption in the development, during which the larva, adapting itself to pelagic life, acquires all the different peculiarities characteristic of the Pili- dium. Itis only after this interruption, corresponding to the duration of independent life, that the development commences which is to lead to the formation of the Nemertes. There is here, evidently, an exaggeration of a larval state followed by a return to the type. To form the Nemertes {from the Pilidium], four little invaginations take place at the expense of the exoderm; these detach themselves and produce four vesicles which fall into the cavity of the body of the Pilidiwm, where they become flattened and are transformed into hollow disks, formed of a thin external lamella turned towards the exoderm, and a thick internal lamella turned towards the endoderm. These four disks soon meet, surrounding the intestine, join together, and coalesce, and thus form a double membrane around the intestine : the inner membrane, formed by the junction of the inner lamellz of the disks, will become the skin of the Nemertes ; the outer one, formed by the coalescence of the external lamelle, will constitute a provisional membrane, the amnios, which will disappear at the same time as the skin of the Pilidium to set the Nemertes at liberty. Without being actually identical, the resemblance of the develop- ment of our Nemertes to that which we have just indicated is great enough to exclude all confusion between the two forms described. As before, the first stages of development are characterized by the presence of a blastosphere which becomes invaginated to give origin to a Gastrula. In the same way, the formation of the Nemertes. is accomplished, in general, by means of the envelopment of the intestine by large discoidal lamelle, which become confluent and unite by their edges to constitute the skin of the Nemertes. Finally, the primitive exoderm is destroyed, and the snimal formed in its interior is set at liberty. But there the analogy stops. Our Nemertes, in fact, presents some important peculiarities which remove it from the Pilidium to bring it nearer the larva of Desor. We have, in the first place, the absence of pelagic life and of the interruption of the development which results from it. Here all the development is performed, from beginning to end, in the interior of the egg, and the animal which issues from it has already acquired the characteristic form of the Nemertes. Besides this fundamental fact, we see also that there is an evident simplification of the embryogeny and a gradual progress towards the extreme conden- sation which is observed in the larva of Desor. The stage which corresponds to the Pilidiwm has already lost all the different characteristic appendages which result from life in a free state, and is reduced to a simple Gastrula covered with fine vibratile cilia. 21* 304 Miscellaneous. Lastly, we can prove the disappearance of one of the two embryonic membranes, the amnios. The disks which surround the digestive tube are not here composed of hollow sacs, but of solid lamelle ; so that a single membrane, the skin of the Nemertes, results from their union. In a word, we see manifested under our eyes a remarkable tendency to the suppression of the exaggeration of the larval state which constitutes the Pilidiuwm, and to a return to the direct mode of development. Here, then, we have, by the side of a development very like that of the Pilidium, a very great simplification and an evident condensation of the embryogeny. One step further and we arrive at the extreme condensation which is observed in the larve of Desor. We have therefore before us an intermediate stage between the Pilidium and the larva of Desor; and this result seems to be of incontestable importance. It enables us to correlate the two widely different forms of the embryos of the Nemertians, and shows us that the mutual relations which exist between them are analogous to those which Fritz Miller has informed us exist between the Vauplius and the Zoéa. Like the Nauplius, the Pilidiwm is the primitive form ; and the larva of Desor represents a condensed form derived from the former by the abbreviation of the embryogeny.—Comptes Rendus, January 25, 1875, pp. 270-273. On the Reproductive Organs of the Eels. By M. Syrsxt. In 1872 two memoirs appeared almost simultaneously by Italian authors, who announced that they had discovered that the eels are hermaphrodites. The agreement in general results was certainly adapted to inspire some confidence; but, on the other hand, con- siderable divergences in the descriptions of the organs showed that the question was far from being completely cleared up. These differences might arise from errors of observation ; or they might be ascribed to differences of organization due to the species, age, or sex of the fishes examined. According to M. Syrski all that relates to the male organs in these two memoirs is completely erroncous, and the eels are not herma- phrodites at all; MM. Balsamo-Crivelli and Maggi were the sub- jects of an illusion when they thought they had ascertained the presence of spermatozoids; the organs regarded by them as the testes are nothing more than fatty bodies. Notwithstanding the assertions of the preceding authors, and the gap which exists in the researches of M. Syrski, the probabilities seem to be entirely in favour of the unisexuality of the eels. In these fishes the males are smaller than the females. Eighty- six individuals, 218-430 millims. in length, examined by M. Syrski proved to be males; and ninety others, 275-1050 millims. long, were females. The previous observers having preferred examining large individuals, had only females under their inspection. The testes appear as nearly symmetrical paired organs, in the form of long ribbons, attached, like the ovaries, along the dorsal wall of the abdominal cavity. That of the right side commences a Miscellaneous. 305 little further forward, and terminates not quite so far back as that of the left side, as is also the case with the ovaries, Both have at their posterior part a sort of prolongation (pars recurrens), which turns furward. Their hyaline aspect and their dimensions give them a great resemblance to the incompletely developed ovaries ; but with a little attention it is seen that they have not the same structure as the female organs, but form two simple longitudinal series of lobules of regular form. Of these lobules there are about 48-50 in each testis; they are compressed and shorter at their base than at their free margin, which is broadly rounded, so that they slightly cover each other. The ovaries are suspended from simple ribbons formed by the peritoneum, whilst each of the testes adheres to the walls of a longitudinal canal (the deferent duct). Each canal terminates cecally in front, and ends posteriorly in a triangular sac (bursa seminalis) applied against the lateral walls of the urinary bladder. The sac of one side is in communication with that of the other by a transverse fissure (fissura recto-vesicalis) which occurs between the rectum and the neck of the urinary bladder. This fissure also leads from the two sacs into a pit (fovea recto-vesicalis) which is continued into the genital pore. The genital pore itself does not open directly outwards, but into the urethra. In the female there are neither canals nor sacs; but the genital pore also opens into the urethra. The stroma of the testis is much more resistant than that of the ovary. ach lobe is formed of compartments about 0-05 millim. in diameter, filled with isolated nuclei, aggregations of nuclei, and cells. The principal arguments which the author brings forward in favour of his new interpretation of the reproductive apparatus of the eels are as follows :— 1. The organs which he regards as testes occupy the same rela- tive position as the oyaries, but differ from the latter in form and structure. 2. The ducts which are in close connexion with them, and open into the genital pore, cannot be any thing but the deferent ducts and the vesicule seminales. 3. The ducts, vesicule, and the genital pore open in proportion as the testes are developed—a course of things which is the same as that observed with regard to the female genital pore relatively to the development of the ovaries. 4. The lobate organs resemble, especially in structure, the testes of the fishes allied to the eels. 5. The eels which possess these organs are destitute of any other formation that could be regarded as a reproductive organ This collection of facts appears quite conclusive. It now only remains to discover the spermatozoids, which M. Syrski has not been able to find in the small eels. This gap in the evidence is of con- siderable importance; and it is to be hoped that it may soon be filled.—Sitzungsber. der Akad. der wiss. in Wren, Math.-naturw. Classe, Band |xix. April 1874; Bibl. Univ. February 15, 1875, p. 163. 306 Miscellaneous. Revision of the Nematoids of the Gulf of Marseilles. By M. A. F. Marron. The recent note by M. Villot on the peripheral nervous system of the Nematoids determines me to defer no longer some rectifications which I intended for a general memoir on the mode of distribution of the marine animals of the gulf of Marseilles. M. Villot indicates in the hypodermal layer of the oceanic Nematoids a remarkable ner- yous network identical with that which he has described in Gordius, This interesting publication greatly modifies the notions that we had as to the sensory apparatus of these little worms. It is only neces- sary to glance through Bastian’s important memoirs (Phil. Trans. 1866, p. 565, and Trans. Linn. Soc. 1865, part 2, p. 83) in order to see how unsettled this question remained. I hope to resume this anatomical investigation upon the species of the Etang de Berre, and to profit by the statements of M. Villot. It is desirable to determine exactly the nature of that esophageal ring that Bastian refers to the glandular system. The rectifications that I shall now present relate solely to the systematic arrangement of the species of the shores of Marseilles. The groups that I formerly proposed correspond exactly with those established by Bastian. My genera Amphistenus, Stenolaimus, Heterocephalus, Thoracostoma, and Enoplostoma are synonymous with his genera Symplocostoma, Anticoma, Phanoderma, Leptoso- matum, and Enoplus. It is difficult to compare the species with a transversely striated cuticle. I recognize in Bastian’s figures various tegumentary adornments that I have observed on the Nematoids of Marseilles; but the buccal and penial armatures appear to differ completely, although their details are not always very distinctly re- presented. The genera Lasiomitus, Eurystoma, Necticonema, Rhab- dotoderma, and Acanthopharynx may therefore be retained. I may add that Symplocostoma longicollis, Bast., is probably the same worm that I have called Amphistenus agilis, and which does not differ from the Enoplus tenuicollis of Eberth. In the same way Hetero- cephalus laticollis, Mar., is identical with Phanoderma Cocksi, Bast., the supplementary penial plate of which is not represented in the plates of the monograph of the Anguillulide. To the same species I do not hesitate to refer the Enoplus tuber- culatus of Eberth. Bastian gives new characters for the genus Enoplus of Dujardin, from which he excludes the freshwater worms. The group thus limited corresponds to my genus Enoplostoma. Enoplostoma hirtum of Marseilles is the same as Hnoplus communis, Bast., of the English coasts. It is impossible to separate from this species Enoplus macrophthalmus, Eberth, EF. Dujardinii, Bast., and E. pigmentosus, Bast. Lastly Thoracostoma echinodon, Mar., is syno- nymous with Leptosomatum figuratum, Bast. It is evident to me that many Nematoids inhabit both the ocean and the Mediterranean. The four species just cited (Sym- plocostoma longicollis, Phanoderma Cocksi, Enoplus communis, and Leptosomatum figuratum), observed by Bastian on the shores of the Miscetlaneous. 307 British Isles, are very common in the gulf of Marseilles. They live among the seaweeds of the shore, and even resist the im- pure waters of the harbour of Arenc. This great geographical extension is still more surprising in re- spect of the freshwater Nematoids. In the pools of La Torse, in the neighbourhood of Aix in Provence, I obtained Dorylaimus stagnalis, Duj., and Trilobus pellucidus, Bast., of the English ponds. Probably M. Villot will find in Brittany most of the species indicated in the Mediterranean. The imperfection of some of Bastian’s figures does not enable me, in the case of several worms, to propose an iden- tification which nevertheless may be foreseen.—Comptes Rendus, February 22, 1875, p. 499. On anew Order of Eocene Mammals. By Prof. O. C. Marsn. At the last meeting of the Connecticut Academy, Feb. 17th, Prof. O. C. Marsh made a communication on a new order of Eocene mammals, for which he proposed the name “ Tillodontia.” These animals are among the most remarkable yet discovered in American strata, and seem to combine characters of several distinct groups, viz. Carnivores, Ungulates, and Rodents. In Tillotheriwm, Marsh, the type of the order, the skull has the same general form as in the bears, but in its structure resembles that of Ungulates. The molar teeth are of the Ungulate type; the canines are small; and in each jaw there is a pair of large scalpriform incisors faced with enamel, and growing from persistent pulps, asin Rodents, The adult denti- tion is as follows:—incisors 3; canines +; premolars 3; molars 3. The articulation of the lower jaw with the skull corresponds to that in Ungulates. The posterior nares open behind the last upper molars. The brain was small, and somewhat convoluted. The skeleton most resembles that of Carnivores, especially the Urside ; but the scaphoid and lunar bones are not united, and there is a third trochanter on the femur. The radius and ulna, and the tibia and fibula are distinct. The feet are plantigrade; and each had five digits, all terminated with long, compressed, and pointed ungual phalanges, somewhat similar to those in the bears. The other genera of this order are less known; but all apparently had the same general characters. There are two distinct families :—T7'/lo- theride, in which the large incisors grew from persistent pulps, while the molars have roots; and the Stylinodontide, in which all the teeth are rootless. Some of the animals of this group were as large asa tapir. With Hyraz, or the Toxodontia. the present order appears to have no near affinities.—WSilliman’s American Journal, March 1875. On the Mediterranean Species of the Genus Eusyllis. By M. A. F. Marton. I - lately indicated, under the name of Eusyllis lamelligera, an annelide of the Gulf of Marseilles, belonging to the remarkable 308 Miscellaneous. genus established by Malmgren for some Syllidians from Spitzber- gen. I have since been able to examine several individuals of the species, and I have constantly recognized the existence of a lamel- lar first ventral cirrus, which acquires a great development and contrasts with the homologous organs of the following segments. The hooks of the composite sete are all very long and of a peculiar form. Iam now able to appreciate better these differential charac- ters, as I have before me other specimens of Husyllis very distinct from the former, and which cannot be separated from Eusyllis moni- licornis, Malmg.; these come from the deep coralligenous regions. These Annelides attain a length of 10 millims., and possess 50 seti- gerous segments. The cephalic lobe is deeply set in the buccal ring, which advances above it, forming a small dorsal gibbosity. We observe two pairs of principal eye-spots, anda supplementary pair of small eyes placed at the base of the outer antenne. All the appendages are irregularly articulated; the first dorsal cirrus attains a consider- able length, and is often rolled up in the manner of the organs of Autolytus. The two palpi are greatly developed, and soldered to- gether at their base. The pedal mamille are all very prominent, and bear pinniform ventral cirri. The ventral cirrus of the first segment, however, is always smaller than those of the following segments, whilst we find a contrary arrangement in Zusyllis lamel- ligera. The trunk occupies the first five zoonites; the denticles with which its aperture is armed seem to be much larger than those of Eusyllis lamelligera, The proventriculus is succeeded by a colour- less region furnished with T-shaped glands; and the intestine pre- sents no very deep constrictions. All these characters agree with Malmgren’s figures and descrip- tion. Each foot is supported by a strong hooked acicula. The composite sete bear rather short bidentate hooks, identical with those of Eusyllis monilicornis from Spitzbergen ; but in the midst of them I find a slender recurved stem, terminated by two little points. This organ exists in all the feet; it is quite independent of the dorsal filiform sete which appear at the time of sexual maturity. From these observations it appears that the genus Husyllis is re- presented on the shores of the Mediterranean by two very distinct forms. One is perhaps peculiar to the Mediterranean; it has not yet been indicated in any other sea. The other, on the contrary, belongs to a type which is diffused even into the Arctic regions. It is evident that it only requires careful investigation to increase the number of species common to the Mediterranean and the ocean. I have ascertained that the Hermelle of the shores of Provence do not differ from those of the English Channel and of the Scandina- vian coasts; and the Psamathe cirrata of Saint-Vaast exists in the coralligenous gravels of Montredon. We cannot, therefore, over- leok the bonds which unite the Mediterranean and oceanic faunas, although the autonomy of these faunas is nevertheless indisputable. —Comptes Rendus, February 22, 1875, p. 498. THE ANNALS AND MAGAZINE OF NATURAL HISTORY. [FOURTH SERIES. ] No. 89. MAY 1875. XXXVIII.—On the Articular Bone and supposed Vomerine Teeth of Ctenodus obliquus ; and on Paleoniscus Hancocki, n.sp., from the Low Main, Newsham, Northumberland. By THOMAS ATTHEY. [Plate XIX. ] Ctenodus obliquus. In a communication made by my late friend Mr. Albany Hancock and myself to the ‘ Annals and Magazine of Natural History,’ ser. 4. vol. vil. p. 190, we pointed out the close relationship that exists between the mandible of Ctenodus and that of the recent Ceratodus, and showed that the upper outer border of the dental plate of Ctenodus is unsupported. At the date of that communication the articular bone of Ctenodus had not been identified as such. For a good many years I had occasionally obtained from the black stone overlying the Low-Main seam of coal at Newsham, near Blyth, Northumberland, an angular bone associated with the cranial bones of Ctenodus, but could not make out to what precise part of the head it might belong, until about three years ago, when Sir Philip Kgerton kindly sent me for examination two palatal teeth and a mandible of the recent fish Ceratodus Forster’, brought from Queensland, Australia. A glance at the specimens showed that the bone respecting which I was in doubt was the articular bone of Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Ser. 4. Vol. xv. 22 310 Mr. 'T. Atthey on Ctenodus obliquus. Ctenodus, corresponding exactly as it did in conformation to the articular bone of the recent Ceratodus. Last year (1874) I was fortunate enough to find, also at Newsham, two fine specimens of Ctenodus obliquus with this very articular bone im situ; and one of these is figured on Plate XIX. figs. 1 and 2. The bones differ in size, being from } of an inch to 4 inches in length. The inner side of the mandible is formed by the ramus or body of the jaw surmounted by the teeth; and these at their upper margins are turned outwards and flattened, and project towards the upper border of the articular or external piece. The narrow ewelied space left between the two bones of the fossil at this part would neces- sarily in the fresh state be filled with connective cartilage and ligament, just as the corresponding space is in the recent Ceratodus Forstert. The articular bone of Ctenodus is of about the same length as the inner plate or ramus which bears the teeth, slightly convex on the outer surface, and marked by five or six aper- tures for vessels ; it is pointed upwards in front like the prow of a boat. Its posterior border presents two scallops, the upper somewhat larger than the lower, which extends to the posteriorly projecting point of the lower border, which is convex; the upper scallop ends at a rounded projection, which separates it from the upper border. This border presents two shallow concavities, the anterior occupying the greater part of the border; the posterior has a projection on its inner side, somewhat in the form of a bracket, for the support of the teeth of the inner plate or ramus. On a thin slab of shale from Newsham in my possession, and which measures 5 by 34 inches, are seen imbedded one rib, several bones of the head, fragments of scales, and what I take to be right and left vomerine teeth of Ctenodus, one of which is figured on Plate XIX. fig. 4. The teeth are 345 of an inch broad, and thick at the base—their outer surfaces being slightly convex and their inner slightly concave, the two surfaces converging from the base to the thin, convex, serrated or toothed margin, which is 53; of an inch long. The microscopic structure of these teeth corresponds exactly with that of the maxillary teeth of Ctenodus. I possess about a dozen other specimens believed to be yomerine teeth of Ctenodus, in close proximity on the same slabs to the bones of the head and teeth of Ctenodus ; some of these are a little larger, others a little smaller, than the two above described. Mr. 'T. Atthey on Palwoniscus Hanecocki. 311 Paleoniscus Hancocki, n. 8). This elegant little fossil fish I have ventured to name after my late lamented friend Mr. Albany Hancock. It measures from 24 to 34 inches in length, and its depth immediately behind the pectoral fin 345 of an inch; tlus is maintained as far as the ventral fin, beyond which it diminishes towards the tail: the body is therefore long and slender. ‘The fins are small; the articulations of each of the rays of the pectoral are very distant, those of the ventral, anal, and dorsal fees so; the rays of the ventral, anal, and dorsal are more slender than those of the pectoral. So far as can be made out, the tail is delicate, the upper lobe somewhat longer than the lower. There are two conspicuous rows of scales on the side of the ventral part of the body near the margin : these scales are twice as high as they are wide ; their external surface is smooth, and their posterior margin finely serrated. The other scales are only about half the size of the above mentioned, and of rhom- boidal form. ‘The head, in length, is about the sixth part of the body. The teeth are very minute, and of two sizes (larger and smaller), sharp-pointed, and set closely in the jaw. The mouth is large; the maxilla and mandibles and the bones of the upper surface of the skull are covered externally with a delicately sculptured and shining pattern of convoluted ridges and grooves, the former of which are flattened. The oper- culum is large and smooth, the suboperculum less. Eight branchiostegal rays exist, and project beyond the line of the mandible, the one next to the pectoral fin being by far the largest. The lower border of the mandible is furnished with a row of projecting points, continuations of the ridges on the side of the mandible. The above characters so clearly separate P. Hancock? from other Palwonisct that I am in doubt whether or not it should be ranked as a member of the genus; but I have given the name Paleoniscus to it provisionally, in order to bring the fossil to the notice of palwontologists. It is from the North- umberland Coal-measures, and has been found in the black shale of the Low Main at Newsham, Cramlington, and Kenton. Note.—I take the present opportunity of correcting two errors into which My. Miall appears to have unconsciously fallen. First, in his paper in the ‘ Journal’ of the Geological Society for December 1874, he says :—‘‘A restoration of the palate of Ctenodus er/status forms oue of the illustrations of Messrs. Hancock and Atthey’s series of papers on the Fishes 29% 312 Dr. R. v. Willemoes-Suhm on the and Labyrinthodonts of the Northumberland coal-field.”. Now the illustration here referred to is not a restoration of the palate of C. cristatus, Agassiz, but of that of C. tuberculatus, nobis. Secondly, he states that we describe the upper surface of the tooth of C. cristatus as convex, whereas in reality we state that it is “somewhat hollowed or concave.” Our paper noticed by Mr. Miall was published in the ‘ Nat. Hist. Trans. of North- umberland and Durham,’ vol. iii. p. 61, the illustration referred to in vol. iv. pl. 14. EXPLANATION OF PLATE XIX. Fig. 1. Outside view of right mandible of Ctenodus obliquus, nat. size. Fig. 2. a8 mandible, seen from above: 4, articular piece; d, dental plate; s, symphysis of jaw. Fig. 8, Left pterygo-palatine bone, with dental poe attached, of Cteno- dus obliquus, nat. size: a, anterior end; pt, pterygoid border ; p, palatine border; s, symphysis; sp, rough surface for articula- tion with the sphenoid bone. Fig. 4. Vomerine tooth of Ctenodus, nat. size: a, front, b, side, ec, back view. XX XIX.—Notes on some Young Stages of Umbellularia, and on its Geographical Distribution. By R. v. WILLEMOES- Suu, Ph.D., Naturalist to the ‘Challenger’ Expedition. [Plate XVIII. A.] Since Umbellularia was rediscovered by the Swedish Expe- dition to Greenland, the attention of zoologists has been specially drawn to it by a paper, with excellent plates, by T. Lindahl*, who himself brought it down from the Arctic regions. Another note has been published by Prof. Kélliker t on specimens of Umbellularia which were brought up during H.M.S. ‘Challenger’s’ cruise in the Atlantic, and sent to him for description by the hydrographer. Both authors were kind enough to send us their papers; and as in the mean time we got a good many more Umbellularie, and even young stages of them, I think a few notes on the geographical distribution of the genus as far as it is now known to us will be welcome to zoologists, as also will a few figures of the earliest stages which we brought up in the Antarctic Ocean. * “Om fester yo Umbellula,” Kongl. Svenska Akademiens Handlingar, Bandet xiii. No. 3, Febr. 10, 1874. + ‘Ueber den Bau und die systematische Stellung der Gattung Umbel- lddaria, Wiirzburg, 2. Mai, 1874. | hed Geographical Distribution of Umbellularia. 313 Umbellularia Thomsonit, Koll., was found in the Atlantic three times :— 1. Between Cape St. Vincent and Madeira, in lat. 35° 20! N., long. 1344° W., at a depth of 2125 fathoms. The speci- men is the largest that has been found; length, according to Kdlliker, 89-5 centims. 2. 300 miles to the eastwardof St. Paul’s rocks, lat. 1°47! N., long. 24° 26’ W., at a depth of 1850 fathoms. ‘This is the smaller specimen which was sent to Prof. Kélliker, who says it has a length of 27 centims. 3. On the coast of Brazil, off the mouth of the San Fran- cisco river, lat. 10° 11’ 8., long. 35° 22' W., in 1600 fathoms. A half-grown specimen. In the Antarctic sea we brought up five times different stages of an Unmbellularia which is very much like the Atlantic species; but whether it is the same or not could not be decided, as the specimens of the latter had already been sent to Europe. ‘he Antarctic species was found in the following localities :— 1. Halfway between Prince Edward’s and Crozet Islands, lat. 46°46! S., long. 45°31! E., at a depth of 1375 fathoms. A half-grown specimen. 2. 84 miles to the westward of Hog Island (Crozets), lat. 46° 16' S., long. 48° 27’ E., at a depth of 1600 fathoms. A full-grown specimen of nearly the same size as the first one found in the Atlantic. 3. Near the ice-barrier, lat. 62° 26'S., long. 95° 44’ E., at a depth of 1975 fathoms. Several very small and middle- sized specimens, some of which will be described hereafter. 4. Qn our way from the ice-barrier to the north, lat. 53° 55’ 8., long. 108° 35’ E., at adepth of 1950 fathoms. Rather small specimens. 5. South of Australia, lat. 42°42'S., long. 34°10’ E., at a depth of 2600 fathoms. Middle-sized specimens. ; We also found an Umbellularia in the Pacific, at a depth of 2440 fathoms, to the south-west of the Louisiade archipelago, where two specimens were brought up, which very likely are different from all those which we got before, as the polyps appeared to be more flattened, wider, and shorter. During our cruise through the Malayan archipelago none of these Pennatulids came up. According to these data, Umbellularia was never found by the ‘Challenger’ in such comparatively shallow water as that in which it has been obtained off the coasts of Greenland. In the neighbourhood of the Antarctic islands it was often found in very deep, never in shallow water. 314 Dr. R. v. Willemoes-Suhm on some The following is a list of all the depths from which Umébel- lularia has been brought up :— 1. Off the coasts of Greenland: 236 fathoms (Adrians), 410 and 122 fathoms (Lindahl). 2. In the Atlantic: 1600, 1800, and 2150 fathoms. 3. Inthe Antarctic sea: 1375, 1600, 1975, 1950, and 2600 fathoms. In the Pacifie in 2440 fathoms. The greatest depth at which this Expedition procured Um- bellularia is Somtnialy 2600 fathoms, the least 1375 fathoms. It is usually associated with such decidedly deep-sea animals as Ophioglypha, Brisinga, Pourtalesia, Ananchytids, Munop- sids, Petalophthalmus, Gnathophausia, Macrurus, &e. After these remarks on its geographical distribution as far as it is known to us at the present moment, I shall proceed to give a few details on its young stages, which were found at station no. 3 in the Antaretic sea, and which show, better than the full-grown specimens of Lindahl and Kolliker, the very marked bilateral symmetry of the polypary and the order in which the polypes sueceed each other. Lindahl has given, on page 8 of his paper, an ideal sketch of what he dite to have been the successive appearance of the polypes on the polypary. According to him, the oldest or terminal polyp (Tin his and in my figures) remains during the first five stages at the top, above the others. Then only the lateral polypes (1. and 11.) come forth, and two of them advance to the top, while the terminal one is removed towards the centre. In the Greenland species of Umbellularia this may be perfectly correct, but in the Antarctic species, of which we actually got the young stages, the mode of growth is a little different. This will be confirmed by a glance at my figures. The smallest specimen (PI. XVIII. A. fig. 1), having only a length of 41 millims.,shows clearly that here also a terminal polype (7), which is 2 millims. longer than the lateral ones, has first made its appearance. The lateral ones have come out a little later, but both at the same time, not the right one earlier than the left, as is supposed in Lindahl’s diagrammatic figures. The same stage is represented by a larger specimen (fig. 3), length 100 millims., in which the terminal polype is still the largest, but in which the lateral ones are already nearly of the same size. The reason why in this large specimen there are only three polypes, while a much smaller one now to be described has already four, is probably want of food. The first change which takes place is the coming out of Young Stages of Umbellularia. 315 another terminal polype, which is effected by the first polype (hitherto at the top) being removed a little towards one side ; and we now get an arrangement (fig. 4) in which there is a polype close to the top on each side of the end of the rachis, or ney both grow out at right angles from the latter; and the polypary now, as in fig. 2, presents a perfectly symmetrical a viz. two polypes on one side and two on the other. The end of the rachis is clearly visible in fig. 1, which has been drawn from a specimen made transparent; and it is in- dicated by a knob in fig. 2. Spicula were not visible in fig. 1. Zooids are first to be seen on the ventral side of fig. 2, and so they are in fig.3; in the largest of the specimens here figured they cover the ventral side of fig. 4a, but leave free a middle line on the dorsal end of the same. The mode of growth of the polypes in this Antarctic Umbellularia is therefore, so far as our specimens show, as follows :— 1. The terminal polype comes out (fig. 1). 2. The terminal polype grows, and two lateral ones come out (figs. 1 and 3). 3. The terminal polype loses its place by another one coming out, and is removed towards the side (figs. 2 and 4). There are now on each side a terminal and a lateral polype (according to Lindahl’s nomenclature). 4. A fifth polype is coming out in the centre of the poly~ pary (fig. 26, 111.) ; and the rest of the polypes very likely come out below the first two lateral ones. In the earliest stage there are neither spicula nor zooids ; the latter, when they have come out, leave a line free on the dorsal side of the polypary. H.M.S. ‘Challenger,’ Manilla, January 1875. EXPLANATION OF PLATE XVIIL A. All the figures give the natural size of the polypes. In fig. 1 ‘the rhachis has been put in as seen by a low magnifying-power. Letters the same in all the figures :—r = terminal polypes; 1. and U.= laterak polypes ; 111.= third lateral or fifth polype ; z = zooids. Figs. 1-4. Young stages of Umbellulariasp.?, found near the antarctic ice-barrier, lat. 62° 26’ S., long. 95° 44’ E., in a depth of 1975 fathoms. Fig. 1. From the ventral side. Length 41 millims. Fig. 2a, from the ventral side; 2b, from the dorsal side. Length 52 millims. ; length of polypes 7-83 millims. Fig. 3. From the ventral side. Length 100 millims., of polypes 11 millims. Fig. 4a, from the ventral side; 4b, from the dorsal side. Length 385 millims., of polypes 15 millims. 316 Prof. F. M‘Coy on a new Species of Trigonia. XL.—On a third new Tertiary Species of Trigonia. By FrepeRIcK M‘Coy, Professor of Natural Science in the University of Melbourne. {Plate XVIII. B.} To the Editors of the Annals and Magazine of Natural History. GENTLEMEN, The genus 7rigonia has furnished an extraordinary apparent oe to the usual distribution of genera in time, accordin to which a genus living in the older periods of the world’s history, and becoming extinct during a subsequent geological at is not found to reappear at a still more recent epoch. Trigonia abounding in the whole of the Mesozoic periods from the Lias to the Chalk, represented by many species, seemed suddenly to become extinct with the commencement of the Eocene Tertiary period, and, being absent in all known Ter- tiary formations, seemed to reappear in the present seas of Australia; and as none of the well-searched Tertiary deposits of Europe or America showed any trace of such shells, a well- defined case of exception to the above-mentioned rule seemed established, until some years ago I described two species, distinct from the living ones, found in the Tertiary formations near Melbourne with Aturta, Carcharodon angustidens and C. megalodon, Otodus Desort, O.cyrhina trigonodon, Squalo- don (Phocodon), and other clearly characteristic Tertiary as distinguished from modern types. As therefore the announcement of the fact will probably be of interest both to zoologists and geologists, I beg to forward you a figure and description of a third Tertiary species of the genus, which I have lately recognized amongst some speci- mens sent to me, as Paleontologist of the Victorian Geological Survey, from the eastern ookee of the colony, the district of Gippsland, of which hitherto comparatively little was known. Trigonia Howitti (M‘Coy). Spec. char. Rotundate rhombic; substance of shell thick ; tumid towards the beak, anterior side rounded, posterior slope moderately flattened in two planes divided by a very obtuse angle rinikiaig the margin ; ventral margin moderately convex, posterior edge nearly at right angles to the ventral edge, slightly rounded in respiratory portion, forming an angle of about 150° with hinge-line in anal portion ; about four narrow quadrate radiating ridges on each division of the posterior slope, sharply separated by deep flattened spaces equal to about their own width ; about fourteen thick, prominent, rounded radiating M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryoloqical Investigations. 317 J yotog J ridges from the beak to the ventral margin, separated by slightly narrower deep concave spaces; near the beak (for about half an inch) all the ribs set with strong blunt trans- verse tubercles, about their own thickness apart (about five in two lines), but on the adults the middle and lower ends of the ribs are marked only with irregular lines of growth, like the intervening hollows, except the seven or eight anterior ones, on which the large blunt tuberculation is continued to the ventral margin (about three in two lines), Length from anterior to posterior end 2 inches 3 lines; proportional width from beak to opposite margin ;%%5; depth of one valve 33,4; ; hinge-line ;5,5,. This species is much larger, thicker, and stronger than the living or the other two Tertiary species, and is readily distin- guished by the tuberculation (except near the beak) being con- fined ; the anterior ribs having, the middle and posterior ones only slightly wrinkled by, lines of growth. The inner edge is strongly toothed by the projecting ends of the channels between the radiating ribs. Sometimes the two small most posterior ridges bear tubercles. This species was collected by Mr. Howitt from the beds of sandy marl at Jemmy’s Point, near the entrance of the Gipps- land lakes, containing Struthiolaria and other forms which I have observed in the Pliocene Tertiaries of New Zealand, but not of any other locality in Victoria. I have great pleasure in naming so interesting a fossil after so excellent and zealous a geologist as Mr. Howitt has proved himself in the Gipps- land district. XLI.—Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. By M. Ussow. [Concluded from p. 221. } CEPHALOPODA (conclusion). To render clearer all the processes described by me, I think it will be useful to enumerate once more the principal facts of the embryonal development of the above-mentioned Cephalo- poda in their normal sequence. After the greater part of the protoplasm of the primitive ovicell, or the formative vitellus which surrounds as with an envelope the whole mass of the transparent fatty fluid (nutri- tive vitellus) has been converted, in the manner already de- scribed (see the process of segmentation), into a layer of flat 318 MM. Ussow’s Zovlogico-Embryological Investigations. or cylindrical cells (more elevated at the upper, pointed pole of the egg) forming the blastoderm or upper germ-lamella (horn-lamella, sensory lamella), on the second (Argonauta) or third (Loligo, Sepiola) day of development a second lamella originates in the middle part (area opaca) of the germinal disk, by transverse division of the upper germ-lamella ; and this, during the period of the appearance of the organs, plays the vart of the middle germ-lamella of the Vertebrata, Annulosa, Mollusca, &e., and like that lamella soon divides, in some of the animals mentioned, into two layers, the dermo-muscular and the intestino-fibrous layers. From the lamella thus dividing, and indeed from the upper first lamella which becomes inverted on the two opposite (ventral and dorsal) sides of the embryo, the young Cepha- lopod is developed upon the broad hemispherical germinal spot or disk, extending as far as the equator of the egg, in from 25 (Argonauta) to 40 days (Loligo). The lower part of the germ, which in most of the species mentioned closes over the obtuse pole of the egg at the end of the first period, becomes the yelk-sac, composed of the upper lamella and the dermo-muscular layer. Development commences in the central part of the germinal disk, and, indeed, by the appearance on the future dorsal sur- face of the animal of an at first insignificant furrow, which rather quickly acquires the form of a groove and subsequently becomes converted into a perfectly closed tube. Simultaneously with the primitive groove appears the rudi- mentary mantle, surrounding it and gradually growing together over it, which separates by constriction at first from the ventral side, but afterwards and more slowly also from the dorsal side. Then there appear one after the other the eye-ovals, the rudiment of the anterior part of the intestinal tract, the paired rudiments of the branchiz, funnel, arms, and auditory organs, and in the original solid anal tubercle the pit-like depression, which is afterwards converted into the ink-bag and the hinder part of the intestinal canal (rectum). At a later period than the above-mentioned organs, the central organs of circulation (auricles, ventricles, &c.) and those of the nervous system (the paired ganglia optica, cere- bralia, pedalia, visceralia, buccalia, and stellata, and the un- paired ganglion splanchnicum) make their appearance. All the organs appearing in the sequence just indicated are developed from three different germ-lamelle in one of two ways :—either as a local thickening (excrescences and internal thickenings) sometimes of the upper, sometimes of one or other layer of the middle lamella, or as an invagination or M. Ussow’s Zovloqico-Embryological Investiqations. 319 A | Yyotog J inversion of the upper lamella. In the former case the upper lamella frequently plays the part of a thin external movalogh to the rudimentary organ, consisting of the dermo-muscular or intestino-fibrous layer ; ; or it splits into several layers, the lower of which form the organ proper. In the second case the upper lamella forms various depressions at different parts of the germinal disk, and penetrates into the middle lamella, which thus forms the 4 en i of the organ. The following Table furnishes a summary of the mode of appearance of each or gan i— | of the upper lamella The eye-ovals. | | | : | 4 = of the dermo- | The mantle, fins, branchie, ae > = | muscular funnel, arms, organ of Le cae ne layer. taste. a | pele pak = : 'E | of the intes- bh | 7 | 3 a bas Bivona The anal tubercle (anal = a law lobe). © Z ayer. | 3 of the upper lamella. All cartilages. 2 ae 5 | - -. P = f the d 4 = | of the dermo- | S Sar iueulae | All coe and peripheral tees = | layer. rg ee oe | § oO iB 5 of the salicis- aS tino-fibrous | The auricles and ventricles. 5 | layer. eda ll sear eal Rs | ee be as ST | EE Pieiied 3 fotxjcard ) [cia elt rnaudth gabaeiaa cate The primitive groove, audi- _Invagination | tory organs, olfactory | | organs, the anterior and _ of the upper lamella. posterior parts of the in- | testinal tract, the ink- | depression bag, the efferent ducts of | the salivary glands. As regards the stomach (and also the so-called crop), the cecum, and the liver, these are secondary formations, origi- nating "from dilatations of the original intestinal tube; the salivary glands and the so-called branchial hearts must. also be reckoned secondary or gas. 320 M. Ussow’s Zoolugico-Embryological Investigations. ‘To show the part taken by the different germ-lamelle in the formation of the various organs, I add the following Table :-— ae The walls of the tube in which the os | Sepi@ is formed, the epidermis (the outer skin of the whole ae and the external covering of the funnel The upper lamella. | and branchie), the ale of sight, hearing, and smell, the pericardium, all the cartilages (of the head, eye- | lids, funnel, &c.). | 2 Be The branchie, the arms with their | | | The suckers, all the muscles, the cutis (fibrous layer, chromatophores, mus- | dermo- cular fibres, &c.), the peritoneum, the branchial hearts, the kidneys, and all the blood-vessels, the organ of taste, the envelopes of the audi- middle layer. tory organs, the peripheral and cen- | The muscular | tral nervous system. | | lamella. The The walls of the central circulatory intestino- system, the auricles, the ventricles, fibrous the muscular envelope of the intes- | layer. tinal tract and of the ink-bag. The intestino-glandular The inner epithelial envelope of the {epithelial | lamella intestinal tract and of all its sub- (the invaginated sidiary organs (cecum, liver), and upper lamella). | of the salivary glands and ink-bag. Comparing the development of the three Decapoda investi- gated BY me with that of the single Octopod to which I had access, I find a great agreement between them, but with the exception that the primitive groove which I have described in the case of the Decapoda does not close in Argonauta. In the time and the mode of appearance of the principal organs (alimentary apparatus, central nervous system, cireu- latory organs, &c.) in the embryos of the two groups they perfectly correspond. The unimportant fact of the late i earn of the yelk- sac in Sepia, already remarked by Kolliker*, is the sole peculiarity of that genus that is not reproduced in the other Decapoda. * Loe. cit. p. 60, M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. 321 THE TUNICATA. With the more accurate knowledge of the anatomy, and especially of the developmental history, of the various species of Tunicata, the notion of the alliance of these animals with the Mollusca (Acephala, Molluscoidea, Himatega), which was for a long time predominant, finds fewer and fewer adherents among modern zoologists*. Since the appearance of the epoch-making work of A. related on the embryology of the simple Ascidia, and of some later} no less pregnant and interesting investigations of the same naturalist relating to the same subject, besides the works of Kupfer§, E. Metsch- nikoff ||, Ganin {], &c., which have confirmed and completed the results obtained by Kowalevsky, the notion of the phylo- genetic relationship of the Tunicata to the Vertebrata, and indeed to their lowest form (Amphioxrus), has gained ground in science. That the separation of the Tunicata from the molluscan type has become necessary in consequence of the investigations just cited is now admitted more or less by all zoologists—some of them, such as Gegenbaur** and E. Hiickeltt, regarding it as possible to refer the Tunicata to the Vermes; whilst others, such as Oscar Schmidttt, who desire to see classification founded chiefly upon embryological data, form with them a special distinct class of Primitive Vertebrates. On the other hand, there are still a good many naturalists (Lacaze-Duthiers§$$, Donitz |\||, Hertwig {{, Von Baer***) who deny all relationship with the Vertebrata to * Hickel, Gen. Morph. Bd. ii. pp. evi, evii, 413; Gegenbaur, Vergl. Anat. 2te Aufl. p. 474; Huxley, Comp. Anat., Less. v. ae Bare lonparcale der einf. Ascid.,” Mém. de l’Acad. de St. Pétersb. tome x. 1866. } “Weitere Studien iiber die Entw. der einf. Ascid.,” Archiv fiir mikr. Anat. Bd. vii. p. 101; Nachr. der K. Ges. der Wiss. p. 401, and for 1868 ; “Ueber die Knosp, der Perophora Listeri, Wiegm.,’’ Kiew Zapiski, Bad. iii, Div. 1; Zeitschr. fiir wiss. Zool. 1871, p. 285. § Arch. fiir mikr. Anat. 1869, p. 459, 1870, p. 115, 1872, p. 358. || Bull. de l’Acad. de St. Pétersb. tome xiii. p. 293, 1869; Zeitschr. fiir wiss. Zool. xxii. p. 339, 1872. 4 ‘Neue Thatsachen aus der Entwickelungsgesch. der Ascid.,’’ Zeitschr. fiir wiss. Zool. 1870, p. 512. ** Vergl. Anat. 2te Aufl. (1870), pp. 158, 474. tt Naturl. Schopfungsgesch. 4te Aufl. (1873), pp. 448, 466, 467. tt Vergl. Anat. 6te Aufl. (1872), p. 248. § “Rech. sur l’organ. et l'embryog. des Ascidies,” Comptes Rendus, 1870, p. 1154. ||| Arch. fiir Physiol. 1870, p. 762. 4 Jen. Zeitschr. Bd. vii. (1872), p. 46. *** Mém. de l’Acad. de St. Pétersb. tome xix. (1873). 322. M. Ussow’s Zoolegico-Embryological Investigations. the Tunicata, and find in them sharply defined characters of the molluscan type. In my investigations of the Tunicata the task I set myself was, in the first place, to test by personal investigation the exceedingly important results of their developmental history and, secondly, to clear up as far as possible some gaps and disputed questions in their anatomy. In the latter direction I endeavoured chiefly to investigate :—1, the structure of the nervous system and its mode of transformation from the form proper to the embryonal and larval states, which have hitherto been very superficially observed and described ; 2, the intimate structure of all the sensory organs of the Tunicata, which has not yet been satisfactorily ascertained ; and, 3, the structure of the inner and especially of the outer mantle, and of the organs of circulation dad nutrition, which likewise presented important questions still unsolved. The following forms were investigated by me in different directions :— I. Sepenrary Tunicata :—Asecidia mammillata, intesti- nalis, canina, mentula; Cynthia microcosmus, papillosa, ampuloidea ; Clavellina lepadiformis; Botryllus smaragdus, auratus ; Diazone violacea. Il. Swiwmine Tunicata :—Appendicularia furcata, fla- gellum, cerulescens ; Pyrosoma gigas ; Salpa africana—max- ima, democratica—mucronata, runcinata—fusiformis, bicau- data, pinnata; Doliolum, Ehrenb., Nordm., Miill. I now proceed to give a condensed statement of the results of my investigations. I. The Nervous System—its anatomy, minute structure, and mode of formation. All the Tunicata investigated by me (except the Appendi- cularia) have a single unpaired ganglion (central pal {00 of authors, 0°1-0°15 millim. in diameter), which is both analogous and homologous with the central portion of the nervous system of the lower Vertebrata (Amphiowus). It is always situated in the middle line on the dorsal s/de of the animal, close to or not far from the entrance of the respiratory cavity. Both the ganglion and all the ak nerves occur in the trans- parent layer of the inner mantle, in which the muscular bundles and the reticulately fibrous connective tissue (dermo-muscular sac) are also imbedded. ‘The distribution of the nervous elements in the ganglion is very simple and uniform. The usually multipolar nerve-cells (gymnocyta) are generally nase in layers in the peripheral part of the ganglion, whilst its M. Ussow’s Zo0logico-Embryological Investigations. 323 centre is occupied by their processes, which run in the direc- tion of the longitudinal axis of the ganglion. All the nervous elements, except for their small size (0:003-0°02 millim.) and the complete absence of the so-called sheath (Markscheide), differ but little from the elements of the nervous tissue which occur, for example, in the cerebellum, the Hasserian ganglion, and in other parts of the central nervous system of the Vertebrata (especially the Fishes). The so-called cesophageal nervous ring which has been de- scribed by some naturalists (Delle Chiaje*, Eschscholtzt, &c.) is wanting in all the Tunicata examined by me. The number of peripheral nerves developed independently of the ganglion is very different in different species, groups, and generations (Salpe). It varies between three single nerves (Cynthia papillosa) and thirty-six pairs of nerves (Salpa maaxima, pinnata, bicaudata, &c.). Peripheral ganglia oceur in the Appendicularie, while in all other Tunicata no such ganglia are met with either in the embryonic or in the fully-developed state. The ganglia caudalia of the Appendicularie, from ten to eighteen in number, which are united by means of an in- ferior nerve of the central ganglion, form a chain} extending into the tail, running over the so-called axial cord (like the chorda dorsalis). A something in common in the plan of structure of the nervous system of the Appendicularie and that of the embryo and larva of the Ascidia is presented by the division of their central ganglion into three parts, which are particularly observable in Appendicularia flagellum. The central ganglion of this animal is divided into :—1, an upper conical part, with three pairs of nerves; 2, a middle, spherical part, with the auditory vesicles seated upon it; and, 3, a lower wedge-shaped part, with two paired nerves and an inferior unpaired nerve, the latter forming as it were the continuation of the ganglion and extending to the extremity of the tail. We find a similar division of the central ganglion (sometimes with a trace of the central cavity or “central canal”’) in very young fixed Ascidia, e. g. the Cynthie (C. microcosmus). The nervous system of the 'Tunicata in the retrograde state can by no means be compared with the nervous system of the Mol- lusea (Baer), either with regard to the morphological plan of its structure or, still more, as respects the type of its embryonal development. * Notom. degli Anim. Invert. vol. iii. pp. 28, 29. + Isis, 1824, p. 5. {t Mill. Arch. 1846, p- 106; Leuckart, Zool. Unters. Heft ii. p. 85; Phil. Trans. 1851, he 596, tab. xviii. tig. 2m; Kowalevsky, Entwicke- lungsgesch. der einf. Ascid. p. 13; Kowalevsky, Kiew Zapiski, vol. iii. part 1, p. 47. 324 M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. The complete absence of the cesophageal nervous ring which exists in the Mollusca, and indeed is characteristic of them, the unity in the structure of their central ganglion, and the development of all parts of their central nervous system from the upper germ-lamella in the form of a nervous ring becoming segmented into three parts are facts which decidedky negative the homology erroneously ascribed to them (the so-called sipho- nal ganglion in Teredo navalis*). From a comparative revision of the nervous system in the different species of Tunicata, the following conclusions may be drawn :—in the Appendicularia the plan of structure of the nervous system is in some degree like that of the Ascidia ; the nervous system of the Pyrosomata may be regarded as a transition form between the transformed nervous system of the adult Ascidia, and the type of structure of the nervous system of the Salpe and Cyclomyarie. The process of transformation of the nervous system of the Ascidian larvee commences immediately after their attachment (so-called sessile form). The ganglion is formed by multi- plication of the embryonal cells, which chiefly occupy the lower part of the upper sensory vesicle and the upper part of the trunk-vesicle. The caudal part (“dorsal cord”) of the embryonal nerve-tube is atrophied without leaving any traces. The pigment of the visual and auditory organs, and all other parts of the dissolving nervous system of the Ascidian larva, become converted into fat-drops, which are gradually absorbed by the young nerve-cells, with which the narrowing cavity of the nerve-vesicle is more and more filled. The formation of the blood-corpuscles is not dependent upon the above- mentioned metamorphosis of the vanishing embryonal system fT. In this way the transformation of the embryonal nervous system into a central ganglion is effected. The ganglionic membrane is developed from the outer cell-layer of the young ganglion, At the time of the formation of the branchial fissures the ganglion is already almost completely developed. Numerous processes of cells of the nervous vesicle, which are at first spherical but gradually elongate and divide, gradually fill up its original cavity. The development of the peripheral nerves is effected by means of a chain-like coalescence of individual nerve-cells which occupy the inner mantle. The finely gran- ular protoplasm of these cells may be regarded as the original substance from which the fibrillar axial cylinders of the nerve- threads are formed. The stellate cells of the connective tissue form by coalescence the neurilemma of the above-mentioned nervous bundles. * Von Baer, loc. cit. p. 21. + Mull. Arch, 18652, p. 317. M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. 325 Il. The structure and mode of formation of the Sensory Organs. 1. The tactile nervous apparatus which are met with in all Tunicata may be classified as follows, in accordance with the peculiarities of their structure :-— a. Simple, very uniformly constructed apparatus. The peripheral multipolar cells (of indubitable nervous nature) united with the thin terminal ramifications of the nerves* emit numerous processes, which unite directly with the pro- toplasm of the epithelial cells (“nerve-epithelium’’) of the inner mantle. b. More composite tactile organs of the Tunicata are bacilli- form, acutely pointed processesT of similar but rather smaller eripheral nerve-cells, sometimes uniting in groups (Doliolide). These processes occur in the lips and some other parts of the inner mantle in some species of natatory Tunicata (Salpide, Doliolide). 2. Olfactory organs.—The so-called ciliated pit of un- doubtedly nervous nature, which is not unfrequently com- bined with a special nerve (nervus olfactortus—Salpa, Dolio- lum, Pyrosoma, &c.), is developed in the form of a depression of the epithelial layer (of the upper germ-lamella) of the inner mantle. At first it contains only one cavity (which persists throughout life in Doliolum, Pyrosoma, and some genera of Salpide), the walls of which then become repeatedly folded, and thus form more or less numerous curved vibratile cavities (in mostof the sedentary Tunicata and many genera of Salpide). In Ascidia mammillata the number of simple ciliated cavities rises to two hundred, which are united among themselves by means of ramifying cecal ciliated tubes situated, like the cavities, in the transparent middle layer of the inner mantle. In the Ascidia just mentioned the openings of the ciliated pits occur in the internal space (atrial chamber, Huxley), between the inner epithelial layer and the wall of the branchial sac. In the cavities there is always only a one-layered vibratile epi- thelium, sometimes surrounded by peculiar spherical pigment- cells, the number of which appears to increase with the age of the animal (especially in Ascidia mammillata). 3. Auditory organs.—The so-called auditory vesicles occur :—a, unpaired, singly (Appendicularie, Cyclomyarie) ; * Similar cells are mentioned by Leuckart, Zool. Unters. Heft ii. . 23, as also in the Heteropoda and other Mollusca, Zeitschr. fiir wiss. ool. iv. p. 8325; see also Boll, Beitr. zur vergl. Histol. p. 20. + As in other Mollusca. See Leydig, Lehrb. der Histol. p. 212; Schultze’s Archiv, p. 448, Taf. 25. fig. 6. Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Ser. 4. Vol. xv. 23 325 M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. b, paired, without canals (Pyrosoma*); and c, paired, and furnished with two canals (Salpidet). The position of the auditory vesicles is very different in different species of Tuni- eata, They are often situated in the neighbourhood of the central ganglion (Appendicularia, Pyrosoma, Salpide), and are always united either with a shed y nerve (nervus acusticus) which terminates in their thin walls, or with a short peduncle of the ganglion (Appendicularia, Pyrosoma). In the pay a in which they have the form of shallow funnels, the auditory vesicles are closely applied to the ganglion by their base, whilst the spirally twisted canals issuing from their apex open by wide apertures into the branchial cylinder, Within the auditory vesicles are lined with simple epithelium, in which no bacillar processes are perceptible. ‘The number of shining calcareous otoliths, which are sometimes coloured (Pyrosoma), enclosed both in the auditory vesicles themselves and in their canals (Salpidze) is very various: in the Appendi- cularie and Cyclomyarie there is usually only one, whilst in Pyrosoma, and especially in the Salpide, their number is ver considerable, To my great regret, | am unacquainted wit the development of the auditory vesicles. 4, Visual organs.—T hese organs are developed in the Tuni- cata, either by a depression of the epithelial layer of the inner mantle (ocelli of the simple and social Ascidia), or by the anterior wall of the upper vesicle of the embryonal nerve- tube being pushed out} (Salpa, Pyrosoma). 'They make their appearance very late in all Ascidia; but in the sedentary Tunicata they are to be seen already in the embryonal state. The pigment of the visual organs, which at first consists of round and slightly coloured, and subsequently of hexagonal united cells, is developed from the same embryonal cells of the outer layer of the above-mentioned part of the nervous system. The simple eyes of the Ascidia (Ascidia intestinalis, mentula, canina, &c.) are very numerous (8/6). In the Pyro- somata and many groups of Sa/pe the eye is usually unpaired (Salpa fusiformis, africana—maxima, democratica—mucro- nata); im the rest it is paired (Salpa bicaudata), and even triple (Salpa pinnata). The outer surface of the eye is turned sometimes towards the respiratory or anterior orifice (Ascidia, many Salpe), sometimes towards the cloacal or posterior * Whilst one, in Pyrosoma gigas, lies beneath the central ganglion, the other occurs on the inner surface of the tubular lip of the anterior orifice. + See H. Miiller’s description, Zeitschr. fiir wiss. Zool. p. 380; Leuckart, loc. eit. Heft ii. p. 25, : } As described by Kowaleysky in Salpa (Gotting. Nachr, 1868, p. 410), M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. 327 opening (Pyrosoma), and with pares or triple eyes towards both openings. In all groups of the Salpe and Pyrosomata the eyes are united to the central ganglion by means of a peduncle of greater or less length (nervus opticus) ; while in the Ascidia, in which their distance from the ganglion is considerable, the union is effected by thin ramifications of the anterior pair of nerves. ‘The eyes, which are usually of a more or less oval form, are either furnished with internal cavities* filled with a transparent substance (Ascidia, Pyrosoma), or destitute of these so-called eye-chambers (Salpe). In the latter case the clavate extremities of rather long bacilliform processes of the nerve- sheath, which fill the whole eye, form a hemisphere. The eyes furnished with chambers have, besides the attenuated epithelial layer of the inner mantle which covers them, a thin proper sheath (Ascidia), or (in Pyrosoma) contain also a verti- cal transparent lenticular body composed of concentric layers (just as e.g. in Anodonta). When the eye-chambers are wanting, the structure of the eyes is similar to that of the Insects and higher Crustacea ; in other words, it approximates to the type of the compound faceted eyes. Thus in the mode of development and structure of the visual organs in the ‘Tunicata (except the Appendiculariide and Doliolidet, which display no trace of eyes) we meet with different types of structure. While the so-called “ocelli” of the Ascidia represent the eyes of the lower Crustacea and Vermes, the compound eyes of the Salpe are homologous with the visual organs of the Arthropoda ; the single eye of the Pyrosomata, which is fur- nished with a lens, may even be likened to the visual organs of some Mollusca. The fact that, when compared with the sedentary Tunicata, the natatory forms with an equal or even smaller size of the central ganglion possess a greater number of peripheral nerves, depends very probably upon the greater development of their locomotive organs (annular or ribbon- like muscles). The great number and high degree of deve- lopment of these, and the much greater development of the sensory organs in the natatory Tunicata, may be explained by the more stirring and energetic mode of life of these animals. * F. Will (Froriep’s Notiz. 1844) found a flat lens in such Ascidian eyes; but this is not confirmed by my investigations, See also Bronn, Weichth. Abth. i. p. 154. + In Doliolum denticulatum, Nordm., &c. I often found behind the ganglion a simple red aggregation of pena (sometimes also in some Botryl), which, however, cannot be likened to the so-called ocelli. : "i 328 M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. Ill. The Body-wall. The envelope or wall of the body consists in all Tunicata of two contiguous mantles—an outer (tunica externa) and an inner one (tunica interna). In most of these animals (especially in the Chthonascidia) the outer mantle consists of three layers :—a, a pee layer (sometimes wanting) of spiniform cells (Cynthia) ; b, a middle, more or less thick, selatinicond fundamental layer of rather firm coalesced sheaths (the so-called “ test-cells”’), pro- duced from the epithelial cells of the membrana granulosa of the Graafian follicle; and, c, a third layer, sometimes very thin and scarcely perceptible (e.g. in Asctdia intestinalis, cantina; Salpe), which is composed exclusively of long elastic fibres, closely applied to the peripheral epithelial layer of the inner mantle (but never coalescent therewith). ‘The outer mantle of the Tunicata is not developed as a product of secretion of the epidermoidal cells of the inner mantle (Hert- wig*, Arsenjewt), but by the multiplication and growth of the above-mentioned ‘‘test-cells”’ (Kupfer, A. Kowalevsky$), which are at first arranged in a single layer between the yelk and the vitelline membrane (chorion). ‘The results of my in- vestigations of the formation of the so-called test-cells agree perfectly with those obtained by A. Kowalevsky||. The yellow corpuscles are in fact nothing but cells of the Graafian follicle, which have arranged themselves in a single series round the mature ovicell, and closed upon it before the formation of the chorion. In the larve of the simple Ascidia, and in the em- bryos of the Salpe and Pyrosomata, the rudiment of the outer mantle consists exclusively of radiating primitive yellow cells, rapidly multiplying by division, and their intercellular sub- stance. These cells, which put forth numerous processes and not unfrequently change their position (“ Wanderzellen,” Kolliker{]), soon coalesce with their sheaths. The contractile protoplasm of such cells gradually eat (becomes ab- sorbed ?). The close network of coalesced thickened sheaths thus forms the porous, vesicular, fundamental substance of the inner mantle, always containing much water (especially in * Jen. Zeitschr. Band vii. 1872, 46. + Berichte der Mosk. Ges. fiir Naturg. und Anthrop. Band x. 1872, p. 86; Jahresb. iiber die Anat. und Phys. 1873, Art. Tunicata, p. 307. t Schultze’s Archiv, Band vi. pp. 149, 159. § Entwickelungsgesch. der einf. Ascid. pp. 13 e¢ seq. || Schultze’s Archiv, Band vii. pp. 105 et seq. Ann. Sci. Nat. tome vy. p. 220; Mull. Arch. 1852, p, 325; Schultze’s Archiv, Band yi. p. 125. Pe ype nee M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. 329 Phallusia mammillata). The well-known ramified, claviform, cecal tubes*, which are met with in the second and third layers of the outer mantle, are developed in the embryos of Cynthia and Phallusia from five cecal diverticula growing forth from the main ventral artery-vein (Phallusia mammil- lata), and afterwards gradually becoming elongated and rami- fying dichotomously. The whole system of the tubes thus ramified forming two rings (Cynthia microcosmus) is nothing but the whole system of the capillary blood-vessels of the outer mantle, which is united to the heart by a thick branch growing forth from the main ventral artery-vein. At the beginning of ramification, the thicker blood-vessels have three-layered walls, possessing an external fibrous layer, a middle one consisting of muscular- fibre rings, and an inner one composed of hexagonal epithelial cells. By the contractions of the muscular layer of the vessels and the pulsations of the heart, the blood is driven to the remotest periphery of the outer mantle. The walls of the fine capillary vessels and their claviform enlargements consist of a simple epithelial layer. - The complete circulation of the blood in the outer mantle is effected in two ways:—l. All the vessels, including their enlarged parts, consist of two tubes grown together ; and in these double vessels, if they may be so called, the centrifugal stream of blood moves on one side, and at the same time the centripetal one on the other (as may be observed, for example, in the embryos of Pyrosomat). 2. The whole network of blood-vessels of the outer mantle is divided into two parts (Cynthie), viz. a, the remoter portion of the blood-vessels, which ramifies near the periphery of the outer mantle, and 4, the portion of the capillary vessels which are distributed not far from the third fibrous layer of the mantle, If the blood is flowing in the former at a given moment in a direction from the heart, it is flowing at the same moment in the other in an opposite direction, or to the heart. The two portions of the capillary blood-vessels just mentioned are united by lateral branches. In correspondence with the regular change in the direction of pulsation in the heart-tube, the course of the blood changes in all the vessels described by me. The outer mantle of the Tunicata can be very easily sepa- rated from the inner one, and never coalesces with the epi- thelial cuticular layer of the latter, which, indeed, may be inferred & priord from the mode of its formation from the * Ann. Sci. Nat. tome y. p, 110, Léwig and Kélliker; Bronn, Weich- thiere, Abth. ii. Taf. 3. + Quart. Journ. Micr, Sci, 1872, p. 283, pl. xii. fig. 9, 330 M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. above-mentioned layer of test-cells, isolated both from the yelk and from the embryo. The only spot where the outer and inner mantles are more closely united is that branch of the main ventral artery-vein (“ s/nus dorsalis,” Milne-Edw.) through which the network of blood-vessels of the outer mantle is connected with the principal blood-system of the Tunicata, the chamberless cardiac tube. The inner mantle, or dermo-muscular sac, of the 'Tunicata consists of a transparent porous and fibrous substance, formed by the coalescence of the stellate cells. In this layer are the muscular bundles and the variously intercrossing fibres of the connective tissue. On the side towards the branchial sac*, and on that towards the outer mantle, this layer is covered with “sane epithelium. The whole inner mantle is developed, as as been proved (by A. Kowalevsky, Kupfer, and others), from the cells of the upper germ-lamella, and consequently, as regards its mode of formation, corresponds to the epidermoidal coverings of all other animals. IV. The Blood-vascular System. The exact investigation of the blood-vascular system in the simple Ascidia (Ascidia intestinalis, canina, mammillata) and the Salpe (Salpa maxima, fusiformis, pinnata, bicaudata) has proved to me that the blood of these animals circulates in a system of closed vessels. It is possible that it is only the small size of many compound Ascidie, Pyrosomata, Cyclo- myarie, and Appendicularie that has prevented the detection of similar vessels furnished with walls in these animals also f. The walls of the vessels consist of a single layer of flat rhomboidal cells. The results obtained by me with regard to the distribution of the blood-vascular system in the inner mantle, in the branchial sac, and in many other parts of the body, agree perfectly with the investigations made by Milne- Edwards | and N. Wagner§ on this matter. Among the * In all the Tunicata investigated by me I have found on the inner mantle, besides the external adherent epithelial layer, a second such layer on the side towards the branchial sac, See Leuck. Zool. Unters. Heft ii. . 13. : + The very general belief in the lacunar system of the Tunicata (Gegenbaur, Vergl. Anat. 2te Aufl. pp. 245, 244) does not seem to be satisfactorily supported by facts. Payen’s opinion (Joc. cit. p. 283) that the vascular system is atrophied in the adult Pyrosomata is not supported by my investigations, as the main vessels, at least, are always furnished with walls. t Mém. de l’Acad. de Paris, tome xviii. Régne Anim. Mollusques, 1842, § Mél. biol, de ’Acad. de St. Pétersb. tome yi. 1866, p. 11 et seg. -_ .— M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. 331 subsidiary organs belonging to the sanguiferous system I reckon :—a, the “band-like organs”’ (stretfenformige Organe*), most frequently to be met with in Salpa pinnata; and b, the paired, spherical bodies (“‘ ovaire,” Sav.t) of the Pyrosomata, which lie in the inner mantle, between the ganglion and the endostyle, on both sides of the body. ‘These organs originate, I believe, from a thickening of many united blood-vessels. They consist of thin epithelial walls ; and their cavity is always occupied by free bluish corpuscles, very like the blood-spherules of the Tunicata, and the protoplasm of which is very contractile f. In the embryos of Salpa pinnata, the “band-like organs ” appear very late, at first as undefined aggregates of contractile bodies, which afterwards become converted into elongated cylindrical, “ band-like organs.”’ ‘Their number in the nurse- form of Salpa pinnata is five on each side ; in the chain-Salpe there is only one such organ on each side. Their function remains unknown to me. V. The Digestive Organs. The digestive organs of the Tunicata may be divided into :— the true alimentary canal, which consists of a short esophagus, a simple or double stomach, an intestine, and a rectum with the anus; and the glandular subsidiary organs—the ciliated arch and more or less separated masses of hepatic cells, which sometimes possess a proper efferent duct, opening into the lower part of the stomach (in some Cyclomyarie). The histological structure of all these digestive organs is very uniform. ‘They consist of:—1, a more or less thin serous membrane, into which looped blood-vessels (e.g. in the ape Ascidia) and nerves penetrate; 2, a one-layered inner epithelial envelope, the glandular and frequently vibratile cells of which are arranged upon its smooth or much-folded inner surface. The absorption of the alimentary material takes lace directly through the thin walls of the blood-vessels. he Tunicata do not possess any special lymphatic vascular system. ‘The tubes formerly designated as lymphatic vessels by Huxley§ are simple glands (‘‘pancreas”’ of other authors?), which open at the surface of the mucous membrane of the intestinal canal and stomach (simple Ascidia, Salpe). * Leuckart, Zool. Unters. Heft ii. pp. 45, 46, Taf. 1. fig. 2; Carus, Ic. Zoot. Taf. 18. figs. 33, 34g. + Mém. sur les Anim. sans Vert. partie 2, pl. xxii. fig. 1. } When the “band-like organs” are isolated and in a fresh state, these corpuscles push forth long pseudopodia, and move very quickly, like the white blood-globules of the higher animals. § Phil. Trans. 1851, pp. 570 & 711, pl. xv. fig. 6. 332 M. Ussow’s Zoologico-Embryological Investigations. Among the subsidiary penne of the alimentary apparatus I reckon also an enigmatical glandular organ, detected by me in some simple (Ascidia intestinalis, canina, Cynthia micro- cosmus) and social (Clavellina lepadiformis) Ascidia. This sac-like gland, consisting of two coalescent portions, is situated sometimes beneath*, sometimes abovet the central ganglion. It consists of numerous, very variously bent, czecal tubes, lyin within a common envelope. Their cavities, which are inal with simple cylinder-epithelium, contain spherical bodies of various sizes. All the tubes of each half of the gland unite in its centre to form a more or less thick tube, or an efferent duct, which opens into one of the nearest cavities of the ciliated pit. This gland occurs very early in young Ascidia; but I have not succeeded in ascertaining from which germ-lamella, or from the parts of which organ, it is formed (by eversion ?), The Tunicata are not Mollusca. Even without taking into consideration the mode of embryonal development, a com- parison of the plan of structure of the different Mollusca with that of the Tunicata suffices to refer the latter with more propriety to the Vermes. The simple cardiac tube, the absence of the cesophageal ganglia and their commissure, the complete absence of the foot, the curvatures of the intestinal canal directed towards the heart, the existence of the outer mantle and the peculiarities of its structure, mode of formation, and chemical constitution, the variability in the directions of the contractions of the cardiac tube, &c., all draw a more or less sharp boundary-line between the Tunicata and the Mollusca. The Tunicata approach most closely to the Bryozoaf. On the other hand, it must be admitted that the simplicity in the structure of the nervous ‘system (the Appendicularie excepted) and the cardiac tube, the relation of the respiratory organ to the upper part of the intestinal canal (Balanoglossus), the indistinct separation of the inner mantle from the muscular layer (dermo-muscular layer), and the very general alternation of generations, constitute characters by which the Tunicata in some degree approach the type of Vermes§ (to which, thanks * In Ascidia intestinalis and canina and Clavellina lepadiformis. + In Cynthia microcosmus, { Huxley, Lect. on Comp, Anat. P 80, 85; Hiackel, Gen. Morphol. Bd. ii. p. ciii; Allman, Brit. Assoc. Rep. 1850, and Trans. Roy. Irish Acad, vol, xx. 1852, p. 275; Van Beneden, Mém. Acad. Belg. vol. xx. pp. 54-58, § Gegenbaur, Vergl. Anat. 2te Aufl. p, 128; Hiickel, Natiirl. Schép- fungsgesch, 4te Aufl. pp. 448, 466, 467, Messrs. Young on new Carboniferous Polyzoa, 333 to careful investigations, the class of the Bryozoa* is now also referred). Further, the type of development of the central nervous system, the axial cord or {the chorda dorsalis present in many species, the relation of the alimentary tube to the branchial sac (Amphiowxus), are all exceedingly exact, repeatedly con- firmed, and extremely important facts, indicating that the class Tunicata presents the fundamental form from which has been developed the type of the Vertebrata+, hitherto standing iso- lated in the systems of the animal kingdom. The entire absence of remains of Tunicata in all geological formations will probably for ever prevent our knowing the transition-forms which united the different kinds of 'Tunicata with the lowest Vertebrata (Amphioxus). Considering all that has been said, I give Oscar Schmidt’s } view, according to which the Tunicata form a special class of Protovertebrata, the preference over all other opinions. XLIL—On new Carboniferous Polyzoa. By Professor Joun YounG, M.D., and Mr. Jonn Younc, Hunterian Museum, University of Glasgow. [Plates IX. & IX. bis.] In the number of the ‘Annals and Magazine of Natural History’ for May 1874 we described the structure of the Poly- zoon which was named Millepora gracilis by Phillips, Cerzo- ora gracilis (Phillips’s species), Morris’s Catalogue, Vincu- ria gracilis by others; and we showed that the structure was such as to justify the institution of a new genus. We have now examined Ceriopora rhombifera, Phillips, and have detected a central axis in it also, this structure being absent in C. similis and C. interporosa, Philips. In the two latter species the cells terminate in a mass of cancellated calcareous tissue of varying amount, but never forming a columnar, far less a tubular axis. We prefer therefore to leave them in the genus Ceriopora, transferrmg C. rhombifera to our new genus Lhabdomeson. After the publication of our former * Chiefly on the basis of the remarkable investigations of Nitsche on Alcyonella fungosa, Pall. See also Mém. Acad. St. Pétersb. vol. xy. p. 50. + With respect to this, see Hackel, Gen. Morphol. Bd. ii. p. exvi et seq., and p. 413 et seq. } Vergl. Anat. 6te Aufl. 1872, p. 248. See also Hiickel, Natiirl, Schopfungsgesch, 4te Aufl. pp, 466, 467, Taf. 12, 18. 334 Messrs. Young on new Carboniferous Polyzoa. paper we sent to Professor Phillips specimens of Rh. gracile, and received in reply the following note, among the last which he wrote :— “April 3, 1874. “My DeAr Sir,—lI agree with you in referring your beau- tiful specimens to the three species (M/Z. gracilis, M. rhombifera M. interporosa) named in my books (‘ Yorkshire,’ vol. i1., an ‘Paleozoic Fossils’). Your examples are better than mine were; but I have no doubt of the reference. The axis, which is jointed in your specimens, has probably been examined (small as it is) in transverse sections. The difference of oppo- site faces in C. or Rh. rhombifera is very interesting. .... “ Yours truly, “ Joun PHrLuirs.” The appearance of jointing is fallacious, as Prof. Prestwich may ascertain, the specimens having been retained by Prof. Phillips for the Oxford Museum. RHABDOMESON, Young and Young, 1874. Rhabdomeson rhombiferum, Phillips’s species. Ceriopora rhombifera, Phillips. Stems slender, cylindrical, free ; branches of nearly equal diameter, given off at wide intervals, as in Zh. gracile, and at right angles to the stem. Cells in quincunx all round the stem; they open at the bottom of depressed areas which are rhomboidal or hexagonal in outline and are bounded by narrow tuberculated ridges, the tubercles on which are larger at the angles of junction ; average number of tubercles round each area, sixteen. Here and there depressed pits with quadran- gular boundaries intervene between adjacent cell-areas; but they are cecal, and do not show in transverse sections. Cell- areas more numerous on one face than on the other, in the pro- portion of 2 to 3, the size of the areas being inverse to their number. Central axis slender, slightly flexuous, and without transverse septa. Cells conical, tapering inferiorly ; their casts identical in form with those of th. gracile (Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. 1874, xiii. pl. xvi. B. figs. 3 & 4). Locality Hairmyres, East Kilbride, in limestone shales, and sparingly in every bed which yields 2h. gracile. This species is easily distinguished from Lh. gracile: 1, its stem is only half the thickness; 2, the cell-areas are larger and angular; 8, the prominent angular tubercle is wanting ; Messrs. Young on new Carboniferous Polyzoa. 335 4, the cell-areas are of unequal size and number on the two faces. In Plate IX. the two faces are shown, and a transverse section exhibiting the proportions of the central axis. The specimens are in the Hunterian Museum, In the Explanation of Sheet 23 (Mem. Geol. Survey Scot- land) Mr. R. Etheridge, Jun., refers (p. 102) to “a species of Polypora, bearing a considerable resemblance to P. verrucosa, M‘Coy. The portions obtained are fragments of a robust branching coralline, with a nearly circular section, and a generally strong and thick appearance, covered with numerous cell-apertures arranged in alternating lines on the celluliferous aspect, five or six apertures in each oblique line. ‘The cells are very pustulose or wart-like, with prominent raised margins. The interspace between each aperture is occupied by waving strie, and in some few specimens appears roughened. In P. verrucosa, M‘Coy, the apertures are round, in the present species they are oval; the margins are equal all round, here one is more projecting than the other. It has also a more robust and stronger appearance than M‘Coy’s species. The reverse presents the peculiar roughened look previously noticed. As it has only, hitherto, been found in fragments, the general habit and nature of the dissepiments cannot be stated. The disposition of the cells and mode of branching are exceedingly like those seen in Thamniscus dubtus, Schl. (King, Perm. Foss. p- 49, pl. v. fig. 9). In the generic description of Polypora, M‘Coy (Synopsis Carb. Foss. p. 206) states that the margins of the cell-apertures are never raised. As the margins in the present form are decidedly raised and prominent, might it not be a species of Thamniscus? If it be a new species of Polypora, | would propose for it the specific designation of P. pustulata.” We have received from Dr. Rankin, of Carluke, specimens of the fossil in question, so well preserved and showing the habit so clearly that we are enabled to give the following description. Thamniscus? Rankini, sp. nov. Plate LX. dis. Stems free, dichotomous, circular, about ;', inch in diameter ; branches in one plane. Celluliferous face equal to two thirds of circumference. Cells arranged in spirals, the left-handed series longer than the right-handed. Cell-apertures circular when entire, becomimg oval when worn; lower lip prominent ; 336 Prof. J. Wood Mason on the Geographical margins of aperture tuberculate. Intercellular surface covered with finely tubercular ridges, whose terminations form the marginal denticles. Non-celluliferous aspect finely granu- lar, faintly striate. Cells encroach irregularly on this face (Plate IX. dis, fig. 5); and small apertures (fig. 4) seem to represent aborted cells. Locality.—Gillfoot, Carluke ; Gair; Robroyston: in Upper Limestone shales, The ornament of a very young branch (fig. 6) has a curious resemblance to that of Sulcoretipora. Figure 7 shows one of the apertures at the can of the non-celluliferous aspect, and the wavy strize around it. The generic position of the fossil is uncertain. It is not a Polypora, since it is not reticulate. Thamniscus, King, shows a tendency to reticulation; but the junctions are at small angles. Synocladia presents the next step towards the Fenestella type. If the gemmuliferous vesicles described by King are essential to his Thamniscus, this character is wanting in our species, even in the best-preserved specimens. Longitudinal sections show the cells starting from an imaginary axis, and reaching the surface at various levels ; but the tendency to an arrange- ment in transverse series, seen in fig. 2, is apparent. We have not yet found the base of attachment. Meanwhile, though strongly disposed to regard this fossil as a true Hornera or a member of a closely allied genus, we think it safer to leave it in the Paleozoic genus Thamniscus, and to name it 7h.? Rankint, after the gentleman to whom we owe the finest examples. XLITI.—Note on the Geographical Distribution of the Temnocephala chilensis of Blanchard. By JAmMEs Woop Mason, Professor of Comparative Anatomy, Medical Col- lege, Calcutta. Some months ago I received from Captain I’. W. Hutton, Curator of the Otago Museum, Dunedin, New Zealand, a series of specimens of the freshwater crayfish lately described by him in this Journal under the name of oa setosus, and was astonished to find, in the sediment at the bottom of the jar containing these crustaceans, numerous ex~ amples of this remarkable little Trematode (which owes its generic name to the fact that the cephalic end of its body is divided by four fissures into five tentacular processes, and —— Distribution of 'Temnocephala chilensis. 337 which is always found living ectoparasitically on the bodies of freshwater crustaceans) ; but none of them being: still ad- herent to the integument of their “chum,” and it consequently appearing to me just possible that they might have been detached from some other animal previously received from Chili in the same jar, I deemed it the wiser course to wait for more conclusive evidence of so interesting a distributional fact. I have since received from my friend Mr. W. Guyes Brittan, of Christchurch, New Zealand, an abundant supply of each of two species of crayfish, from the rivers Avon and Waimakiriri respectively, two or three individuals of each of which have great numbers of this Trematode still affixed to the smooth intervals between the spines, both of the carapace and of the chelipeds. The occurrence of Temnocephala in New Zealand is thus established. In their present shrunken condition, the little creatures closely resemble a split pea, with the tentacles projecting, fringe-like, from a portion of the circumference, and range from 1 to 4or 5 millims. in diameter. Dr. R. A. Philippi, who gives (in ‘Archiv fiir Naturgesch.’ 1870, vol. xxxvi. pp. 35-40, pl. i. figs. 1-6) some details of its structure, states that he himself found it in Chili on a species of Aiglea, and on no other river-prawn. Dr. C. Semper, who met with it in the Philippines on various species of freshwater crabs, in an interesting and full account (in ‘ Zeitschr. fiir wiss. Zool.’ 1872, vol. xxi. pp. 307-310, pl. xxii.) of its anatomical structure, shows conclusively that its true position is amongst the Trematodes, and not amongst the Leeches, as was supposed by Blanchard and Moquin-Tandon. Calcutta, March 5, 1875. P.S.—Since the above was written, I have received the zoological collections made by Major Godwin-Austen during the expedition against the Daflas (as certain of the wild Mongoloid inhabitants of the north-east frontier of India are called), and found a single specimen of Temnocephala chilensis in a bottle containing, besides numerous land animals of various groups, two fishes, to one of which it had in all probability been attached. Indian Museum, Calcutta, March 19, 1875. 338 Mr. A. G. Butler on new Species of XLIV.—Descriptions of new Species of Lepidoptera from Central America, By Arruur GARDINER BUTLER, F.L.S., ¥.Z.8., &c. WE received some time since a species of Morpho, which I have been unable to identify with any form hitherto charac- terized. It is a very distinct and beautiful species, resembling on the upperside, as also in the outline of the wings, J/. Mon- tezuma and allies; on the underside, however, it more nearly approaches Jf, Neoptolemus. As I believe this species to be quite new, I characterize it as follows :— Morpho polybaptus, n. sp. Above very like M. Montezuma: wings greenish blue, with a moderately broad black outer border: primaries with basicostal area dusky ; a white spot above end of cell; black border widest upon costa, which is also black as far as the white spot ; an oblique elongate subcostal white spot at inner third of external black border, also two apical submarginal series of white points, the inner series of four, the outer of three points ; fringe spotted with white at extremity of inter- nervular folds: secondaries with the outer black border rather narrower than in primaries; fringe with two white spots between each undulation ; two dull red lituree at anal angle; abdominal area grey, palest at base: body dull brown; head, collar, and pterygodes black ; the external margin of the palpi and two dots between the eyes red, two spots on the collar creamy yellow, a spot on each of the pterygodes greyish white ; antenne black. Wings below deep chocolate-brown, varied with pale shining green bands, large red-zoned ocelli, and buff ~ and scarlet submarginal bands: general pattern as in J/. Neo- ptolemus, from which it differs as follows :—primaries with the costal greenish streak red at base; no longitudinal green streaks in the cell, but two well-defined transverse streaks— the first irregular, oblique, reddish at its lower extremity, the second crossing the middle of the cell in a straight line; two indistinct, irregular, oblique, subterminal discoidal lines ; streaks bounding the lower margin of the cell and the bases of the median branches, rose-coloured instead of green ; irregular postmedian green band distinct, and nearly equal in width from subcostal nervure to the middle of interno-median inter- space, where it terminates near the external angle in two rosy spots ; an oval oblique subcostal spot above the uppermost ocellus ; ocelli with narrower deep orange-red zones; sub- ee Ses Lepidoptera from Central America. 339 marginal white spots wider apart, connected by distinct black dashes, the ground-colour between them bright buff; secon- daries with a crimson streak near the base and three on abdo- minal area, also a crimson streak along the lower half of the abdominal margin; irregular green streaks on basal area broader and more distinct; intermediate submarginal lunu- lated streak crimson, excepting at the interruptions on the nervures, where it is grey; ocelli larger, with deep orange- red zones. payee of wings 5 inches 3 lines. Hab. Costa Rica (Grab). Type, B.M. Tn a collection of insects recently presented to the British Museum by Osbert Salvin, Esq., [ have found the following beautiful new species of Heterocerous Lepidoptera :— Family Arctiide. Subfamily Caarrmemx*. Genus BELEMNIA. Belemnia Jovis, n, sp. General character of B. eryx, but much larger and more brilliant in colouring, the rosy spot on primaries replaced by a larger deep-carmine spot ; the abdomen above entirely bright metallic green, with a central longitudinal brown streak ; in B. eryx the hinder segments are purple in the male, and the female probably has a yellow instead of a rosy spot in pri- maries; on the underside the green streaks and spots are much more brilliant than in B. eryx, and the carmine spot as above. Expanse of wings 2 inches to 2 inches 1 line. Hab, Veragua (Salvin), Honduras (Miller). Type, B.M. The example from Honduras was previously the only repre- sentative of this species in the collection, and was considered to be the female of B. eryx; now, however, we have a fine series, owing to the generosity of Mr. Salvin, and there can be no doubt of its entire distinctness. It is most like B, in- aurata of Sulzer (nec Cramer), but differs in the uniform green colour of the abdomen in both sexes. B. ¢naurata of Cramer may be named B. Cramert. * I find by a careful study of the structural characters of this group, and more especially of the neuration of the wings, that they cannot be separated from the Arctiide. 340 Mr. A. G. Butler on new Species of Subfamily Perreorryx. Genus PERICOPIS. Pericopis Lucretia, n. sp. @. Allied to P. zerdbina, but broader and shorter in the wing; the bands in primaries less oblique and more diffused ; the spot crossing the discoidal cell narrowed into a streak, and continued across the wing to the submedian nervure ; the submarginal series of reddish ochreous lunulated spots smaller, eight in number, and therefore forming a continuous series ; the discocellular black line interrupted ; abdomen more orange in tint; primaries below with all the markings well defined, the median nervure and its branches blackened ; secondaries with the veins blackened, the costal area (excepting at base) dark brown ; the outer margin with a broad dark brown border; the submarginal ochreous spots seven in number, and very small; a broad black longitudinal ventral streak on the abdomen. Expanse of wings 2 inches 10 lines. Hab. Veragua (Salvin). Type, B.M. The position of this species will be between P. leonina and P. zerbina. Family Melameride. Genus JOSIA. Josia cruciata, n. sp. Primaries black, with a broad orange-yellow streak from base to centre of outer margin; secondaries with the costa and external areas broadly black, a broad central orange-yellow belt from inner margin to apex; inner margin orange: body black above, head and thorax spotted with orange, metathorax orange; abdomen with a creamy white, narrow lateral line: trochanters, proximal extremity of tibice and tarsi of first pair of legs, whole of hind pair of legs, creamy white ; venter creamy white; body below otherwise black; wings with the orange bands broader, otherwise as above. Expanse of wings 1 inch 3 to 5 lines, Hab. Veragua (Salvin). Type, B.M. Nearly allied to the Josta fulvia of Walker and to J. ligata, but easily distinguished from both by the whitish lateral line and more distinctly white venter of the abdomen; it also differs from the Josia fulvia of Walker (nec Linn.) in the greater width of the orange bands, and from both in the Lepidoptera from Central America. 341 absence of an orange costal margin to the primaries. The Phalena fulvia of Clerck’s ‘ Icones’ is a Chrysauge closely allied to my C. Limbata. Family Lithosiide. Genus RUSCINO. Ruscino latifasciatus, 1. sp. Closely allied to R. menea, but rather smaller, with the ochreous bands of primaries, basal area of secondaries, and body deeper in colour, the bands of primaries broader, the external black area of secondaries slightly narrower. Expanse of wings | inch 4 to 8 lines. Hab, Veragua (Salvin). Three specimens, B.M. Evidently a local form of R. menea. Family Larentiide. Genus SCORDYLIA. Scordylia Salvini, n. sp. Wings above saffron-yellow, the apices broadly black; primaries with the outer margin, including the apical area, from centre of costa to submedian nervure broadly (but decreasingly) black, the inner edge of the black area irregu- larly zigzag, internal margin at external angle narrowly black, three basicostal red-brown dots : a small quadrate costal yellow spot at centre of black apical area; two or three apical whitish dots on the fringe ; secondaries with the apical black area tri- undulated internally ; an irregular narrow external black border from apical area to anal angle: body whity brown : primaries below with the basal half of costa whity brown, crossed by black and red-brown liture ; apex red-brown; the costal spot and a diffused patch at apex whity brown; secon- daries whity brown, freckled with red-brown; apical area red-brown, varied with grey and whity brown; otherwise as above. Expanse of wings 1 inch 4 lines. Hab. Veragua (Salvin). Two examples, B.M. S. Salvint is most nearly allied to S. perfectaria, but is larger, has the black areca of primaries much narrower towards external angle, and a yellow costal spot upon it; the apical area of secondaries is also broader, and the under surface of all the wings (excepting at apex of primaries) much deeper in colour. Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Ser. 4. Vol. xv. 24 342 Dr. Franz Léw on a new Family Tortricide. Genus ATTERIA. Atteria rivularis, n. sp. Nearly allied to A. voleanica; rather more golden in colour- ing, the black costal area of primaries broader, and the ex- ternal border narrower ; the transverse creamy-white streaks of costal area longer, and not united to one another at their lower extremities ; the branching apical external streaks more transverse ; five black spots within the lower half of the cell, one or two on the disk near the external margin, and some- times several along the inner margin; secondaries with three disconnected marginal black spots at apex, and five along the external margin: below as above. Expanse of wings 1 inch 3 lines, Hab. Veragua (Salvin). Two specimens, B.M. This species evidently takes the place of the New-Granadan A, voleanica at Veragua ; it is a very beautiful insect. Amongst the other Lepidoptera presented to the collection by Mr. Salvin, I may mention the very beautiful Charidea arrogans of Walker, Flavinia lata, and Simena luctifera, of which we previously only possessed the types (of C. arrogans four examples, and of the other two species a good series) ; also two examples of Tostomorpha longivitta, Felder, which was not previously in the collection, but only differs in its superior size from Walker’s Josta penetrata. XLV.—Tylenchus millefolii, 2. sp., a new Gall-producing | Anguillulide. By Dr. Franz Low ?. On the lowest leaves of the common milfoil (Achillea mille- folium, Linn.), which usually form a small turf, from spring to autumn we find small gall-like inflations, 3-4 millims. in length, which are generally seated upon the midrib, less fre- quently at the base of the pinne, but always in the neigh- bourhood of the apex of the leaf. These inflations, which show no means of entrance or exit any where, are eovered externally by the epidermis of the leaf, and are at first just as green as the rest of the leaf and equally hairy. The walls * Translated by W. 8. Dallas, F.L.S., from the ‘Verhandlungen der k.-k. zoologisch-botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien,’ Band xxiy. (1874), pp. 17-24. Gall-producing Anguillulide. 343 are at first comparatively thick, firm, and full of sap; but towards autumn they gradually become thinner, less juicy, and wrinkled in folds, whilst their colour at the same time gradually changes to yellowish green. ‘T'wo or three of these galls often occur upon one leaf, by which the latter is greatly deformed, as each gall causes an angular bending or twisting of the axis of the leaf. If we open one of these inflations we see in its interior, with the lens, a soft whitish lump, surrounded and penetrated by a greenish yellow, somewhat viscous fluid. This whitish lump, when brought into contact with a drop of water, quickly flows asunder ; and we then see, under the microscope, hundreds of Anguillule in all stages of development, twisting about one over the other with slow movements. As in all known Anguillule of plants, the extraordinary vitality of this species after desiccation for months is very remarkable. I tested this tenacity of life, by taking a leaf bearing galls, collected in May and dried for my herbarium, and moistening it in October. Within a few hours all the Anguillule, which had been dried in it until they were quite brittle, were again lively. HEven those which are repeatedly dried upon the object-slide of the microscope waken to new life after each moistening. This remarkable tenacity of lite is confirmed by most authors. Dr. Julius Kiihn, who dis- covered Anguillula dipsaci in the inflorescence and fruit of Dipsacus fullonum, Mill.*, found that this species came to life again when moistened with water after eight months’ de- siccation in a heated room. Bauert states the duration of the capacity of revivification in Anguillula tritéed at eight years. Baker} found that the young of Angutllula tritie? enclosed in diseased grains of wheat could be revived even after a desic- cation of twenty-seven years, by moistening with water; and this property, which the Anguillule possess in common with the T'ardigrada and Rotatoria, was already known to Linné§. But reviving as is the effect of moistening with water upon the dried Anguillule, remaining in it is equally injurious to them ; for although they cannot exist without a certamm amount of moisture, they die m water usually within a few days, as * Zeitechr. fiir wiss. Zool. Bd. ix. (1858), p. 129. + Ann. des Sci. Nat. tome ii. (1824), p. 154. t Lettre de Needham en réponse au Mémoire de Roffredi dans le Journal de Physique de l’Abbé Rozier, 1775, p. 227. § Linné says of the Anguillule of vinegar and paste (Syst. Nat. ed. xii. tom. i. p. 1326) :—‘‘Chaos: Corpus liberum, uniforme, redivivum, artubus sensusque externis nullis. 1. Ch. redivivum, filiforme, utrinque attenu- atum ; habitat in aceto et glutine Bibliopegorum. Reviviscit ex aqua per annos exsiccatum ; oviparum vel yiviparum.” 24* 344 Dr. Franz Liw on a new was also observed by Dr. Kiihn in the case of Anguillula dipsact. I have hitherto met with the deformations produced by the Anguillulide under consideration on the leaves of Achil- lea millefolium, only in some parts of the Pfalzauthal in the Wienerwald, and always only in very small numbers. Whether the whole plant is injured by it I could not ascertain, as I have always found it only upon the leaves of isolated plants of scanty growth standing upon poor soil, never upon strong and luxuriant plants. The Anguillule themselves agree exactly in their principal characters with the other known forms infesting plants. The only specific differences are derived from the size and colour of the body, and the proportions of its parts to one another. But before indicating the specific characters of the milfoil- Anguillula, I will give an accurate description of it. The Anguillule of the milfoil have an elongated body, attenuated towards the two ends, round in transverse section, and of undecided colour. ‘They may be said to be translucent whitish with a greenish yellow shimmer. ‘This shimmer, how- ever, appears to proceed from their food, which in all proba- bility consists of the above-mentioned greenish yellow fluid contained in the galls. By transmitted light the body is seen to be entirely filled with granules of different sizes and forms, which prevent any examination of internal organization. The external integument of the body is rather thick, quite smooth, and shining. In the middle of the anterior, obtusely rounded end of the body is the mouth, which is continued within into the cesophagus, which runs straight for a very short distance, and at a distance from the mouth equal to the transverse diameter of the body at the same spot presents a globular muscular dilatation. From this it runs backward in an in- "distinctly visible tortuous line, and at the second curvature loses itself entirely in the granular contents of the body. In Anguillula dipsact Dr. Kiihn observed that the portion of the cesophagus situated behind the globular dilatation was also somewhat tortuous, and presented at its extremity a second similar dilatation, which I could not detect in the Anguillula of the milfoil. The other Anguillulide (e. g. A. fluviatilis, aceti, glutinis, mucronata, linea, &c.) possess similar rounded muscular dilatations of the cesophagus*. The posterior extremity of the body is rather rapidly atten- uated, and terminates in a much finer point than the anterior end. Prof. Grube has already indicated that all Anguillule * Grube, “ Ueber einige Anguillulen, und die Entwicklung von Gordius aquaticus,” in Arch. fiir Naturg. Jahrg. xv. (1849), p. 358. Gall-producing Anguillulide. 345 living in plants are oviparous*, and that they have their genital apertures in the vicinity of the posterior extremity of the body, ‘This is precisely the case in the Anguillula of the milfoil; it is Oviparous, and the genital apertures of both sexes are more or less near the caudal extremity. ‘Their distance from the latter must be regarded, in the present state of our knowledge of these animals, as one of the best of the few specific characters. The male has a somewhat curved linguliform penis, rapidly attenuated from a broad base; this can be pushed forth from the anus, which surrounds it like a sheath, and opens obliquely backwards and outwards. ‘The cleft-like anal orifice, which is placed transversely to the longitudinal axis of the body, has a slightly prominent margin, and is situated at a distance of one sixteenth or one seventeenth of the total length of the body from the end of the tail. Immediately behind the anus the transverse diameter of the body of the male diminishes considerably ; it tapers off quickly to a point, which in the adult male is always bent almost angularly in a direction away from the anal aperture. In most cases the penis was retracted within the anus, so that the margins of the latter closed together; only in one individual did the apex of the penis project from the anal cleft, when it was distinctly seen to be a little broader than thick, 7. e. tongue-shaped. ‘The Pee ee power with which I worked did not enable me to see distinctly the two spicula and accessory parts, of which the penis of the Anguillulide consists. A short distance in front of the male genital aperture, about the beginning of the last twelfth of the body, there originates a very delicate, perfectly transparent membrane, which extends over the above-mentioned genitalia to the hinder extremity, and is attached to the sides of the body. This membrane is usually tightly stretched, only appearing slightly folded trans- versely in dried individuals. When the male is laid exactly on his back, the membrane described is frequently seen to project a little laterally beyond the margin of the body; but in most instances this is not the case. * As Linné was already aware (see note §, p. 345), the Anguillulide are sometimes oviparous, sometimes viviparous. These different modes of reproduction even occur in the same species; for Goeze reports (“ Mikrosk. Erfahrungen iiber die Essigaale,’ in the ‘ Naturforscher,’ Stiick i. 1774, p. 34) that the Anguillule of vinegar bear living young after the manner of the Aphides, from July until autumn, and in the autumn lay eggs which survive the winter. Nay, even the same indi- vidual may be both oviparous and viviparous; for Claus states (Zeitschr. fiir wiss. Zool. Bd. xii. 1353, p- 354) that his oviparous A. brevispina is identical with Grube’s 4. mucronata, as in this species the same female produces her first brood oviparously and the later ones viviparously, 346 Dr. Franz Liw on a new . What functions this organ performs, and what are its rela- tions to the genital organs, is still unknown. Dr. J. Kiihn first discovered this organ in the male of his Anguitllula dip- sac?, and he also found it impossible to find any data for its elucidation in his repeated observations of that worm. With regard to the interpretation of this organ (which occurs in the males of all the species of the genera T'ylenchus, Bast., and fthabditis, Duj.) Lagree rather with Kiihn than with Bastian*, being, like the former, of opinion that it is stretched like a velum over the anal aperture; whilst Bastian thinks that two delicately membranous wings (“caudal ale’) are attached to the sides of the tail of the male, the contour of which is seen under the microscope both in the lateral and dorsal position. For if Bastian’s opinion were correct, the membrane must appear much narrower in the lateral than in the dorsal posi- tion of the animal ; but just the contrary is the case. The female genital aperture is also situated near the hinder extremity of the body, and leads to a vagina directed vertically to the longitudinal axis of the body, which opens outwards with prominent margins, and there appears as a short trans- verse cleft (vulva). The distance of the vulva from the hind- most point is one eighth of the total length of the body. This [caudal] part of the body in the female is always slightly bent towards the ventral side, and does not diminish so rapidly as in the male. As already mentioned, the granular and vesi- cular contents of the body render all inspection of it almost impossible; and so I did not succeed in recognizing the in- ternal sexual organs, the termination of the intestine, and the anal aperture in the female; on the other hand, I twice saw distinctly, in the interior of the body of the female, quite close to the vulva, a sharply defined egg, which showed precisely the same finely granular contents mixed with a few vesicles as the numerous eggs lying loose among the worms. Males and females do not differ in length in this species. The greater number of them are almost exactly 1 millim. in length ; only a few do not reach this size, and remain only 0°9 millim. long. But as exceptions exist almost everywhere, I found among the majority of females of nearly equal length one of 1°3 millim. length, and of proportionately increased thick- ness. As regards thickness, the males of the same length ap- pear to be a little thinner than the females. It is, however, very difficult to give perfectly accurate, reliable measurements for creatures such as these little worms—as on the one hand, when alive they are never still, but are constantly bending, stretching * “ Monograph on the Anguillulide,” Trans, Linn, Soc. vol. xxv. (1866), p- 126. Gall-producing Anguillulide. 347 and pushing about; and on the other, when dead, although they may lie straight, they may always be unduly extended or contracted, which with such small individuals may easily cause a difference of 01 millim. or even more. The young Anguillule not yet sexually mature, which always occur asso- ciated with the fully developed and sexually mature individuals, and indeed in greater number than the latter, are of very dif- ferent lengths according to the degree of their development. In the form of the body they resemble the sexually mature individuals ; only the granules and vesicles of the contents of the body are larger. The egg is about twice as long as broad, equally rounded at the two ends ; its contents are finely granular, with several vesicles scattered through them. Some time before hatching, the young Anguillule may be seen through the delicate mem- brane of the egg. ‘They lie elliptically curled up in the egg, following the form of the latter. When hatched they are about five times as long as the egg, or about one fifth of the length of the adult*. ‘The circumstance that we almost always find together all the stages of development of the Anguillula of the milfoil, from the egg to the egg-laying individual, may be explained by supposing either that in this species several generations follow one another during the favourable season of the year, or that the oviposition takes place at very various times, as, indeed, Dr. Kiihn supposes to be the case with Anguillula dipsact. The mode of life of the milfoil-Anguillula probably re- sembles exactly that of A. dipsac?, Kiihn, A. tritic?, Roff., and other Anguillule of plants. The young asexual Anguil- lule winter in the leaf-galls ; or the last-deposited eggs may winter outside the galls; and in the spring, when the galls are already rotted by the moisture of the soil, they quit them, creep upon the young shoots of the milfoil, bore into the still tender tissues of the expanding leaves, and produce upon them atresh the galls described at the commencement of this paper, in which they become further developed, and give birth to new generations. ‘Towards autumn the original abundance of sap in the galls is gradually exhausted, their green colour passes to yellow; finally they become withered and wrinkled ; and the individuals contained in them, which have never quitted the gall, stiffen or become dried up at the beginning of the cold season, to be awakened again from this apparent death only by the sunshine of spring. * In the viviparous Anguillulide, such as Anguillula aceti, glutinis, fluratilis, &c., the young are born still enclosed in the egg-membranes. 348 On a new Gall-producing Anguillulide. Bauer, Davaine*, and Bastian have made interesting ob- servations as to the mode in which the Anguillule of the wheat get into the flowers of T’riticum vulgare, Vill. Bauer sowed grains of wheat into the furrows of which he had introduced young individuals of Anguillula tritic’, and found, by examining the plants from time to time, that the Anguil- lula ascended to the ears in the interior of the straw. Davaine, on the contrary, asserts that the Anguillule creep from without into the innermost sheath of leaves which surrounds the growing ear, and then penetrate into the extremely delicate parenchyma of the flowers at a time when all the parts of the flower exist as rudiments in the form of scales. Bastian, who successfully repeated Bauer’s inoculation experiments, confirms Davaine’s observations, which also agree with the opinions expressed by Dr. Kiihn as to the mode of lite of Anguillula dipsaci. The Anguillula discovered by me producing galls upon the milfoil belongs to the genus Tylenchus, established by axdant and characterized by him as follows t:—“‘ Body naked, tapering at the two extremities ; extremity of tail without a sucking- papilla; integument with extremely fine transverse striae; in the pharynx a protrusible spear with a trilobed base ; ceso- phagus globularly dilated in the middle; intestine indistinct, covered with coarse, colourless fat-granules; vulva consider- ably behind the middle of the body; uterus unsymmetrical ; the two spicula of the penis united to the posterior accessory piece ; caudal ale in the males not supported by rays; move- ments sluggish.” To this genus Bastian refers, besides three species (Z. Davainit, terricola, and obtusus) established by him, 7. tritic’, Roffredi, of the wheat, 7. dipsacz, Kiihn, of the teasel, and the grass-Anguillule (7. agrostidis and phalaridis, Steinb.), which Steinbuch} found in pouch-like galls in the flowers of Agrostis sylvatica, Huds., and Phalaris phleoides Linn.§ It is probable that the producers of the galls found by Frauenfeld|| upon the leaves of Gnaphalium Leontopodium, * Davaine, ‘Recherches sur l'Anguillula du blé niellé,’ Paris, 1857, L. iii. fig. 12. ; t (Dr. Léw seems to have modified Mr. Bastian’s generic character, as this, although marked as a quotation, differs in some points from the deseription in Linn. Trans. vol. xxv. p. 125.—Eb. t ‘Der Naturforscher,’ 28. Stiick (1799), pp. 283 & 255. Diesing, in his ‘Systema Helminthum,’ ii. p. 152, has described as a single species, under the name of Anguillula graminearum, the three species A. tritici, agrostidis, and phalarids. § Agrostis sylvatica, Huds., is synonymous with Agrostis polymorpha, Huds.; and Phalaris phleoides, Linn., with Phleum Bohmert, Wibel. \| ‘Verhandl. zool.-bot. Gesellsch. in Wien, Bd. xxii. p. 397. On the supposed Auditory Apparatus of Culex. 349 Jacq., and Falearia Rivini, Host, also belong to this genus, and perhaps the Anguillula secalis, Nitschke, which lives in the lower internodes of the rye*. Almost all the species placed in this genus live in plants, and are for the most part gall-producers ; for, according to Davaine’s investigations, the cockled grains of wheat are not diseased seeds, but galls probably originating from the rudi- ment of a filament, as he found the aborted pistil in the diseased flowers; and Bastian (/. c. p. 87) further adduces, in support of this view, the fact that in his inoculation experiments the cockled grains were always formed on the diseased plants when the healthy stalks first began to flower. By analogy the little sacs in the flowers of grasses in which Steinbuch found the above-mentioned grass-Anguillule will also probably be not deformed fruits, but galls. As the Anguillula of the milfoil differs from the other species of the genus 7ylenchus by several constant characters, I describe it as a new species under the name of Tylenchus millefolii. The following is its diagnosis :— Tylenchus millefoliit, n. sp. Albidus, transparens, corpore in utroque sexu 0°9-1°3 millim. ’ A tes 1 longo, extremitate antica parum attenuata, obtusa, rotundata Ew z rs = ) ) ? postica lentius acuminata, cauda maris (a pene) +;—7!; cor- poris equante, dorsum versus hamuli instar curvata, cauda feminz (a vulva) $ corporis equante, ventrem versus paulo ae dasol: agate os incurva. Distantia bulbi cesophagi ab ore latitudinem cor- poris eodem loco vix equante. Habitaculum: Galle in foliis Achillee millefolii. XLVI.—Experiments on the supposed Auditory Apparatus of the Culex mosquito. By ALFrep M. Mayerf. Oum states in his proposition that the ear experiences a simple sound only when it receives a pendulum-yibration, and that it decomposes any other periodic motion of the air into a series of pendulum-vibrations, to each of which corresponds the sensation of a simple sound. Helmholtz, fully persuaded of the truth of this proposition, and seeing its intimate connexion * ‘Verhandl. zool.-bot. Gesellsch. in Wien,’ Bd. xviii. p. 901, + [The worm is figured, with some details by the author (7. c. pl. i. B) ; but we have not thought it necessary to reproduce the figures, as the description is clear enough without them.—Ep. } t oni the ‘Philosophical Magazine,’ ser. 4, vol. xlviii. No. 319, 350 Prof. A. M. Mayer’s Ecperiments on the supposed with the theorem of Fourier, reasoned that there must be a cause for it in the very dynamic constitution of the ear; and the previous discovery by the Marquis of Corti of several thousand* rods of graded sizes in the ductus cochlearis, indi- cated to Helmholtz that these were suitable bodies to effect the decomposition of a composite sonorous wave by their covibrating with its simple harmonic elements. This supposed function of the Corti organ gave a rational explanation of the theorem of Ohm, and furnished “ a leading-thread ” which conducted Helm- holtz to the discoveries contained in his renowned work Die Lehre von den Tonempfindungen+. In this book he first gave the true explanation of timbre, and revealed the hidden cause of musical harmony, which, since the days of Pythagoras, had remained a mystery to musicians and a problem to philo- sophers. It may perhaps never be possible to bring Helmholtz’s hypo- thesis of the mode of audition in the higher vertebrates to the test of direct observation, from the apparent hopelessness of ever being able to experiment on the functions of the parts of the inner ear of mammalia. The cochlea, tunnelled in the hard temporal bone, is necessarily difficult to dissect ; and even when a view is obtained of the organ of Corti, its parts are rarely in situ, and often they have already had their natural structure altered by the acid with which the bone has been saturated to render it soft enough for dissection and for the cutting of sec- tions for the microscope. As we descend in the scale of development from the higher vertebrates, we observe the parts of the outer and middle ear disappearing, while at the same time we see the inner ear gradually advancing toward the surface of the head. The external ear, the auditory canal, the tympanic membrane, and with the latter the now useless ossicles, have disappeared in the lower vertebrates, and there remains but a rudimentary labyrinth. * According to Waideyer, there are 6500 inner and 4500 outer pillars in the organ of Corti. + “ But all of the propositions on which we have based the theory of consonance and dissonance rest solely on a minute analysis of the sensa- tions of the ear. This analysis could have been made by any cultivated ear without the aid of theory; but the leading-thread of theory and the employment of appropriate means of observation have facilitated it in an extraordinary degree. “Above all things I beg the reader to remark that the hypothesis on the covibration of the organs of Corti has no immediate relation with the ex- planation of consonance and dissonance, which rests solely on the facts of observation, on the beats of harmonics and of resultant sounds.”—Helm- holtz, Tonempfindungen, p. 542. Auditory Apparatus of the Culex mosquito. d51 Although the homological connexions existing between the vertebrates and articulates, even when advocated by naturalists, are certainly admitted to be imperfect, yet we can hardly sup- pose that the organs of hearing in the articulates will remain stationary or retrograde, but rather that the essential parts of their apparatus of audition, and especially that part which re- ceives the aérial vibrations, will be more exposed than in higher organisms. Indeed the very minuteness of the greater part of the articulates would indicate this; for a tympanic membrane placed in vibratory communication with a moditied labyrinth, or even an auditory capsule with an outer flexible covering, would be useless to the greater number of insects, for several reasons. First, such an apparatus, unless occupying a large proportion of the volume of an insect, would not present surface enough for this kind of receptor of vibrations ; and secondly, the minute- ness of such a membrane would render it impossible to covibrate with those sounds which generally occur in nature, and which the insects themselves can produce. Similarly, all non-aquatic vertebrates have an inner ear formed so as to bring the aérial vibrations which strike the tympanic membrane to bear with the greatest effect on the auditory nerve-filaments ; and the minute- ness of insects also precludes this condition. Finally, the hard test, characteristic of the articulates, sets aside the idea that they receive the aérial vibrations through the covering of their bodies, like fishes, whose bodies ure generally not only larger and far more yielding, but are also immersed in water which transmits vibrations with 44 times the velocity of the same pulses in air and with a yet greater increase in intensity. For these reasons 1 imagine that those articulates which are sensitive to sound and also emit characteristic sounds, will prove to possess receptors of vibrations external to the general surface of their bodies, and that the proportions and situation of these organs will comport with the physical conditions necessary for them to receive and transmit vibrations to the interior ganglia. Naturalists, in their surmises as to the positions and forms of the organ of hearing in insects, have rarely kept in view the im- portant consideration of those physical relations which the organ must bear to the aérial vibrations producing sound, and which we have already pointed out. The mere descriptive ana- tomist of former years could be satistied with his artistic faculty for the perception of form; but the student of these days can only make progress by constantly studying the close relations which necessarily exist between the minute structure of the organs of an animal and the forces which are acting in the animal, and which traverse the medium in which the animal 352 Prof. A. M. Mayer’s Experiments on the supposed lives. The want of appreciation of these relations, together with the fact that many naturalists are more desirous to de- scribe many new forms than to ascertain the function of one well-known form which may exist in all animals of a class, has tended to keep many departments of natural history in the condition of mere descriptive science. Those who are not pro- fessed naturalists appreciate this perhaps more than the na- turalists themselves, who are imbued with that enthusiasm which always comes with the earnest study of any one depart- ment of nature ; for the perusal of those long and laboriously precise descriptions of forms of organs without the slightest attempt, or even suggestion, as to their uses, affects a physi- cist with feelings analogous to those experienced by one who peruses a well-classified catalogue descriptive of physical in- struments while of the uses of these instruments he is utterly ignorant. The following views, taken from the ‘Anatomy of the Inver- tebrata’ by C. Th. v. Siebold, will show how various are the opinions of naturalists as to the location and form of the organs of hearing in the Insecta:—‘‘ There is the same uncertainty concerning the organs of audition [as concerning the olfactory organs]. Experience having long shown that most insects per- ceive sounds, this sense has been located sometimes in this and sometimes in that organ. But in their opinion it often seems to have been forgotten, or unthought of, that there can be no auditory organ without a special auditory nerve which connects directly with an acoustic apparatus capable of receiving, con- ducting, and concentrating the sonorous undulations. (The author who has erred most widely in this respect is Mr. L. W. Clarke in Mag. Nat. Hist., September 1838, who has described at the base of the antennz of Carabus nemoralis, Llig., an audi- tive apparatus composed of an auricula, a meatus auditorius externus and internus, a tympanum and labyrinthus, of all of which there is not the least trace. The two white convex spots at the base of the antennze of Blatta orientalis, and which Tre- viranus has described as auditory organs, are, as Burmeister has correctly stated, only rudimentary accessory eyes. Newport and Goureau think that the antenne serve both as tactile and as auditory organs. But this view is inadmissible, as Krichson has already stated, except in the sense that the antenne, like all solid bodies, may conduct sonorous vibrations of the air; but even admitting this view, where is the auditory nerve? for it is not at all supposable that the antennal nerve can serve at the same time the function of two distinct senses.) “Certain Orthoptera are the only Insecta with which there Auditory Apparatus of the Culex mosquito. 353 has been disccvered in these later times a single organ having the conditions essential to an auditory apparatus. This organ consists, in the Acridide, of two fosse or conchs, surrounded by a projecting horny ring, and at the base of which is attached a membrane resembling a tympanum. On the internal surface of this membrane are two horny processes, to which is attached an extremely delicate vesicle filled with a transparent fluid and representing a membranous labyrinth. ‘This vesicle is in con- nexion with an auditory nerve which arises from the third tho- racic ganglion, forms a ganglion on the tympanum, and termi- nates in the immediate neighbourhood of the labyrinth by a collection of cuneiform staff-like bodies with very finely pointed extremities (primitive nerve-fibres 7), which are surrounded by loosely aggregated ganglionic globules. (This organ has been taken for a soniferous apparatus by Latreille. J. Miiller was the first who fortunately conceived that in Gryllus hierogly- phus this was an auditory organ. He gave, however, the inter- pretation only as hypothetical; but I have placed it beyond all doubt by careful researches made on Gomphoceros, Uedipoda, Podisma, Caloptenus, and Truzalis.) “The Locustide and Achetide have a similar organ situated in the fore legs directly below the femoro-tibial articulation. With a part of the Locustide (Meconema, Barbitistes, Phanero- ptera, Phylloptera), there is on each side of this point a fossa, while with another portion of this family there are at this same place two more or less spacious cavities (auditory cap- sules) provided with orifices opening forward. These fossze and these cavities have each on their internal surface a long- oval tympanum. ‘The principal trachean trunk of the leg passes between two tympanums, and dilates at this point into a vesicle whose upper extremity is in connexion with a gan- glion of the auditory nerve. This last arises from the first thoracic ganglion, and accompanies the principal nerve of the leg. From the ganglion in question passes off a band of ner- vous substance which stretches along the slightly excavated anterior side of the trachean vesicle. Upon this band is situ- ated a row of transparent vesicles containing the same kind of cuneiform staff-like bodies, mentioned as occurring in the Acridide. The two large trachean trunks of the fore legs open by two wide infundibuliform orifices on the posterior border of the prothorax; so that here, as in the Acridide, a part of this trachean apparatus may be compared to a tuba Eustachii. In the Achetidz there is on the external side of the tibia of the forelegs an orifice closed by a white silvery membrane (tym- panum), behind which is an auditory organ like that just de- scribed. (With Acheta achatina and italica there is a tympanum 354 Prof. A. M. Mayer's Experiments on the supposed y } ‘pp of the same size on the internal surface of the legs in question ; but it is scarcely observable in A. sylvestris, A. domestica, and A. campestris.)”’ Other naturalists have placed the auditory apparatus of diur- nal Lepidoptera in their club-shaped antenne, of bees at the root of their maxille, of Melolontha in their antenual plates, of Locusta viridissima in the membranes which unite the antenna with the head. I think that Siebold assumes too much when he states that the existence of a tympanic membrane is the only test of the existence of an auditory apparatus. It is true that such a test would apply to the non-aquatic vertebrates; but their homolo- gies do not extend to the articulates ; and besides, any physi- cist can not only conceive of, but can actually construct other receptors of aérial vibrations, as I will soon show by conclusive experiments. Neither can I agree with him in supposing that the antennee are only tactile organs ; for very often their posi- tion and limited motion would exclude them from this function *; and moreover it has never been proved that the antennz, which ditfer so much in their forms in different insects, are always tac- tile organs. They may be used as such by some insects; in others they may be organs of audition ; while in other insects they may, as Newport and Goureau surmise, have both fune- tions; for even granting that Miiller’s law of the specific energy of the senses extends to the insects, yet the anatomy of their nervous system is not sufficiently known to prevent the supposi- tion that there may be two distinct sets of nerve-fibres in the antennz or in connexion with their bases, so that the antennz may serve both as tactile and as auditory organs—just as the hand, which receives at the same time the impression of the character of the surface of a body and of its temperature—or hke the tongue, which at the same time distinguishes the surface, the form, the temperature, and the taste of a body. Finally, I take objection to this statement :—‘‘ Newport and Goureau think that the antenne serve both as tactile and as auditory organs. But this view is inadmissible, as Erichson has already stated, except in the sense that the antennee, like all solid bodies, may conduct sonorous vibrations of the air.” Here evidently Siebold had not in his mind the physical relations which exist between two bodies which give exactly the same number of vibrations; for it is well known that when one of them vibrates, the other will be set into vibration by the impacts sent to it through the interve- * Indeed they are often highly developed in themselves while accompa- nied by palpi, which are properly placed, adequately organized, and en- dowed with a range of motion suitable to an organ imtended for purposes of touch. ; Auditory Apparatus of the Culex mosquito. B55 ning air. Thus, if the fibrilla on the antennz of an insect should be tuned to the different notes of the sound emitted by the same insect, then when these sounds fell upon the antennal fibrils the latter would enter into vibration with those notes of the sound to which they were severally tuned; and so it is evi- dent that not only could a properly constructed antenna serve as a receptor of sound, but it would also have a function not possible in a membrane; that is, it would have the power of analyzing a composite sound by the covibration of its various fibrillee to the elementary tones of the sound. The fact that the existence of such an antenna is not only supposable, but even highly probable, taken in connexion with an observation I have often made in looking over entomolo- gical collections, viz. that fibrille on the antenne of nocturnal insects are highly developed, while on the antenne of diurnal insects they are either entirely absent or reduced to mere rudi- mentary filaments, caused me to entertain the hope that I should be able to confirm my surmises by actual experiments on the effects of sonorous vibrations on the antennal fibrillz; also the well-known observations of Hensen* encouraged me to seek in aérial insects for phenomena similar to those he had found in the decapod the Mysis, and thus to discover in nature an appa- ratus whose functions are the counterpart of those of the appa- ratus with which I gave the experimental confirmation of Fourier’s theorem, and similar to the supposed functions of the rods of the organ of Corti. The beautiful structure of the plumose antennz of the male Culex mosquito is well known to all microscopists ; and these organs at once recurred to me as suitable objects on which to begin my experiments. The antennz of these insects are twelve- jomted ; and from each joint radiates a whorl of fibrils; and the latter gradually decrease in their lengths as we proceed from those of the second joint from the base of the antenna to those of the second joint from the tip. These fibrils are highly elastic, and so slender that their lengths are over three hundred times their diameters. They taper slightly, so that the diameter at the base is to the diameter near the tip as 3 to 2. I cemented a live male mosquito with shellac to a glass slide, and brought to bear on various fibrils a one-fifth objective. I then sounded successively, near the stage of the microscope, a series of tuning-forks with the openings of their resonant boxes turned towards the fibrils. On my first trials with an Ut, fork of 512 vibrations per second, I was delighted with the results of the experiments ; for I saw certain of the fibrils enter into vigorous vibration, while others remained comparatively at rest. * “Studien tiber das Gehdrorgan der Decapoden,” Siebold und KGlliker’s Zeitschrift fur wissenschaftliche Zoologie, vol. xiii. 356 Prof. A. M. Mayer’s Experiments on the supposed The Table of experiments which I have given is characteristic of all of the many series which I have made. In the first column (A) I have given the notes of the forks in the French notation, which Kénig stamps upon his forks. In the second (B) are the amplitudes of the vibrations of the end of the fibril in divisions of the micrometer-scale; and in column C are the valves of these divisions in fractions of a millimetre. A. B. OF is es a oe ‘0042 millim. 2 eta ee 70200 _—sé=~; oo a 0147, a. . ar 0168 sé», 8 5 gee egy. le “0504. ,, 1 mame. Saas gi) 2 Nees Sle. eps Oe a Gieg. > a a fae 0126 __,, 8 | Re IR 0168 so, The superior effect of the vibrations of the Ut, fork on the fibril is marked ; but thinking that the differences in the ob- served amplitudes of the vibrations might be owing to differ- ences in the intensities of the various sounds, I repeated the experiment, but vibrated the forks which gave the greater ampli- tudes of covibration with the lowest intensities; and although I observed an approach toward equality of amplitude, yet the fibril gave the maximum swings when Ut, was sounded; and I was persuaded that this special fibril was tuned to unison with Ut, or to some other note within a semitone of it. The differ- ences of amplitude given by Ut, and Sol; and Mi, are con- siderable ; and the Table also brings out the interesting ob- servation that the lower (Ut,) and the higher (Ut;) harmonics of Ut, cause greater amplitudes of vibration than any interme- diate notes. As long as a universal method for the determina- tion of the relative intensities of sounds of different pitch re- mains undiscovered, so long will the science of acoustics remain in its present vague qualitative condition*. Now, not having the means of equalizing the intensities of the vibrations issuing * I have recently made some experiments in this direction, which show the possibility of eventually being able to express the intensity of an aérial vibration directly in fraction of Joule’s dynamical unit, by measuring the heat developed in a slip of sheet rubber stretched between the prongs of a fork and enclosed ina compound thermo-battery. The relative intensities of the aérial vibration produced by the fork when engaged in heating the rubber and when the rubber is removed, can be measured by the method I de- scribed in the Philosophical Magazine, 1873, vol. xlv. p. 18. Ofcourse, if we can determine the amount of heat produced per second by a known fraction of i... = °° °°°.}}©=»=©)DhCOOO K Auditory Apparatus of the Culex mosquito. 357 from the various resonant boxes, | adopted the plan of sounding with a bow each fork with the greatest intensity I could obtain. I think that it is to be regretted that Koénig did not adhere to the form of fork with inclined prongs as formerly made by Marloye; for with such forks one can always reproduce the same initial intensity of vibration by separating the prongs by means of the same cylindrical rod, which is drawn between them. Experiments similar to those already given revealed a fibril tuned to such perfect unison with Ut, that it vibrated through 18 divisions of the micrometer, or *15 millim., while its amplitude of vibration was only 3 divisions when Ut, was sounded. Other fibrils responded to other notes ; so that I infer from my experiments on about a dozen mosquitos that their fibrils are tuned to sounds extending through the middle and next higher octave of the piano. To subject to a severe test the supposition I now entertained, that the fibrils were tuned to various periods of vibration, I mea- sured with great care the lengths and diameters of two fibrils, one of which vibrated strongly to Ut,, the other as powerfully to Ut,; and from these measures I constructed in homogeneous pine-wood two gigantic models of the fibrils, the one corre- sponding to the Ut, fibril being about 1 metre long. After a little practice I succeeded in counting readily the number of vibrations they gave when they were clamped at one end and drawn from a horizontal position. On obtaining the ratio of these numbers, I found that it coincided with the ratio exist- ing between the numbers of vibrations of the forks to which covibrated the fibrils of which these pine-rods were models. The consideration of the relations which these slender, taper- ing, and pointed fibrils must have to the aérial pulses acting on them, led me to discoveries in the physiology of audition which I imagine are entirely new. If a sonorous wave falls upon one of these fibrils so that its wave-front is at right angles to the the intensity, we have the amount produced by the vibration with its entire intensity. Then means can be devised by which the aérial vibration pro- duced by this fork can always be reproduced with the same intensity. This intensity, expressed in fraction of Joule’s unit, is stamped upon the apparatus, which ever afterward serves as a true measure for obtaining the intensities of the vibrations of all simple sounds having the same pitch as itself. The same operation can be performed on other forks of different pitch ; and so a series of intensities of different periods of vibration is oh- tained expressed in a corresponding series of fractions of Joule’s unit. Recent experiments have given —-*- of a Joule’s unit as the approxi- mate dynamic equivalent of ten seconds of aérial vibrations produced by an Ut, fork set in motion by intermittent electromagnetic action and placed before a resonator. Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Ser. 4. Vol. xv. 25 858 Prof. A. M. Mayer’s Experiments on the supposed fibril, and hence the direction of the pulses in the wave are in the direction of the fibril’s length, the latter cannot be set in vibration ; but if the vibrations in the wave are brought more and more to bear athwart the fibril, it will vibrate with am- plitudes increasing until it reaches its maximum swing of co- vibration, when the wave-front is parallel to its length, and there- fore the direction of the impulses on the wave are at right angles to the fibril. These curious surmises I have confirmed by many experiments made in the following manner.