[ ISSN 0250-4162 A publication of the | Bird Committee of the | East Africa Natural History Society Edited by =a Darcy Ogada David Pearson Volume 33, January 2014 » " Bi rdLife Natur@Kenya INTER NATIONAL The East Africa Natural History Society NOS Ol. S ISSN 0250-4162 ia x oO Th wr RO — we ap A publication of the Bird Committee of the East Africa Natural History Society Edited by Darcy Ogada David Pearson Volume 33, January 2014 DA. BirdLife | NaturéKenya INTERNATIONAL Scopus 33, January 2014 Contents FRANCOISE DOWSETT-LEMAIRE AND ROBERT J. DOWSETT. Checklist of the birds of Kipini Conservancy, Lamu and Tana River districts, coastal Ke- DAVID PEARSON, HERBERT BIEBACH, GERHARD NIKOLAUS AND ELIZABETH YOHANNES, Spring weights of some Palaearctic passerines in Ethiopia and Kenya: evidence for important migration staging areas in eastern Ethiopia Same een mea nS ATRYN Penn ne Me Cee H, AO ME ae A Meme SOIL AN uh) 45 ROGER Q. SKEEN. A review of birds in Uganda: records updating the Ugan- da Atlas and notes on species unrecorded Since 1980 ..mmmnmnnemnnnmnnnnes 53 JAMES BRADLEY AND DAVID BRADLEY. The Kavirondo Escarpment: a previ- ously unrecognized site of high conservation value in Western Kenya ... 64 Short communications SARAH NACHUHA AND IMRAN EJOTRE. Observations on the trend of the Pink- backed Pelican Pelecanus rufescens at breeding colonies, eastern Uganda sdm cat alk UN el cg eea c ghaitb L SIN 0 aN a 70 DONALD A. TURNER. Further remarks concerning the Little Egret complex in FASE ALAC peace ah unt tetee cell lace MA st tether ase asa et eM Laka se ee a 72 CHACHA WEREMA. Shelley’s Greenbul Andropadus masukuensis in Kimboza Forest: Reserve, TanZaniiaiicis cis ciscsinciishd Cavett dia UMAR NAN UI Dee seer ut rte eed 74 SEAN MCEneryv. A record of Black-shouldered Nightjar Caprimulgus MISTISCHDULATIS Thy: VAVZATIA a.) eh Oe Mate at al rate gt ne gee ee 76 DONALD A. TURNER. The genus Phoeniculus in eastern and north-eastern Africa, with remarks concerning the Phoeniculus purpureus superspecies ADDISU ASEFA AND ANOUSKA A KINAHAN. Preliminary checklists for two Important Bird Areas of Ethiopia: Sof Omar and Shek Husein in the Bale s} Of © a 92 5.) MA eg MOR cee IRA US 1 nan rete ee RI a ce ret athe 80 ROGER Q. SKEEN. Great Knot Calidris tenuirostris at Lutembe Bay, Uganda abuts se A dd ta Re ec 84 N.E. AND E.M BAKER. White-throated Swallow Hirundo albigularis in DeaN Ze ie ases se ee atte ae Ce ee 85 jh yf 6 4 Genet Ue re ce tee ec eee ate lO EME sre ll tes 86 East African rarities committee report. commmmnmnnmnmnninnnnnnnnninnnnse 87 | Grr 0) | Ree ee ae eee Andee ene 92 Scopus 33: 1-44, January 2014 Pe Checklist of the birds of Kipini Conservancy, ~ Lamu and Tana River districts, coastal Kenya Francoise Dowsett-Lemaire and Robert J. Dowsett Summary During a holiday in Kenya we were invited to visit the Kipini Conservancy, just north of the Tana River. We encountered a number of birds of interest in this little-known area, particularly noteworthy being Black-and-white Flycatcher Bias musicus, the first sighting on the Kenya coast for many years. Range extensions included two species previously unrecorded north of Sokoke Forest: Green Tinkerbird Pogoniulus simplex and Pallid Honeyguide Indicator meliphilus. Among breeding records was the first of African Crake Crex egregia from the Kenyan coast. Species of conservation concern present at Kipini included resident Southern Banded Snake Eagle Circaetus fasciolatus and Malindi Pipit Anthus melindae (the latter numerous), and migrant Madagascar Pond Heron Ardeola idae. Many pairs of the regionally threatened Saddle-billed Stork Ephippiorhynchus senegalensis were among waterbirds present in the area. Introduction Kipini Conservancy, created in 2006, covered approximately 250 km?2, between the Tana River delta and the villages of Witu and Mpeketoni (Fig. 1). During a holiday visit to Kenya we were invited to Kipini by Richard Hartley, who was then running the Conservancy. We spent 64 days in the reserve, between 11 October and 26 Decem- ber 2006. Heavy rainfall experienced from November onwards somewhat restricted exploration of the area. We present here details of the birds we saw in an area whose avifauna has been insufficiently studied. Except for comparison we have not detailed the observations made by visitors to the Tana River delta area, outside the Kipini Conservancy limits. In 2006 the south-western boundary of the Conservancy stopped 1-2 km east of Kipini town (thus did not reach the river), and the north-western and north-eastern boundaries abutted onto Witu Forest Reserve and the southern bank of Lake Kenyat- ta respectively. On the seafront it was bordered by c. 20 km of pristine sand beaches. The area visited The main habitats were live dunes, coastal thickets, seasonally flooded grassland and pans in large depressions (“ziwas”), wooded grassland, thicket-clump savanna and semi-evergreen rain forest. A large part of Kipini Conservancy included the “Nai- robi Ranch”. This consisted of a small herd of cattle (about 130 head) mixing with Burchell’s Zebras Equus burchelli and other wild mammals. The vegetation of the future Kipini Conservancy was the subject of some investigations, mainly by Ann Robertson and Quentin Luke in November 1988. Results were published in a report on the vegetation of coastal forests of Kenya (Robertson & Luke 1993). The authors referred to the area under “Ras Tenewi National Coastal Zone”. "o e i # & ¥ ; A pp F. Dowsett-Lemaire and R. J. Dowsett Overall we spent more time in the coastal zone (Sandamuke, Baharini, Ziwa Lamuu) than in the north-west (one visit to the forests of Witu Extension and Luim- shi, 30 October-3 November). The one important site we did not visit was the large forest gallery at Kangawati. Witu Forest (then outside the Conservancy) was not vis- ited. The short rains were considerable in 2006. Occasional showers in October (some heavy), a downpour on 5 November and on later dates in that month, led to increased flooding of pans. More rain still fell in December, daily around the middle of the month. By mid-December there was very extensive flooding of ziwa grassland in the south; whereas the north-eastern section (Baharini) was getting drier. Habitat types with their dominant bird species Eight main habitat categories can be recognized in the Conservancy, progressing from the coast to the interior. Tree nomenclature follows Beentje (1994). Sand beaches The seafront of the reserve was about 20 km long, the Ras Shaka point being on the southern boundary. Most of this consisted of pristine sand beaches and small por- tions of coral cliffs (at Ras Shaka and Seven Sisters). But the beaches were largely covered at high tide and, as a result, did not harbour large populations of waders. Live dune thickets Live dunes are raised above the level of the beach by several metres and form a band several dozen metres in width (often c. 50-60 m), rising and then descending towards the plain inland. The wall of sand facing the beach has been receding slowly with the rise in sea level and trees have been falling off the edge. Live dunes were covered with dense thickets, 2-3 m high. These were often impen- etrable, although in places they were interrupted by patches of bare sand, especially on the steeper slopes. Some of the shrubs present have spines. The most characteristic and frequent woody plants in the area of K4 (Fig. 1) were Cordia somaliensis, Haplocoe- lum inoploeum, Salvadora persica (a variant with round leaves, cyclophylla), Syderoxylon inerme, Tarenna trichantha and Uvaria denhardtiana (semi-scandent). Bird-wise, this habitat was rather species-poor, but one sunbird (Variable Sunbird: for scientific names, see systematic list) was found nowhere else in the area, and two bush shrikes (Brown-headed Tchagra, Slate-coloured Boubou) were more common here than inland. Zanzibar Greenbul, Northern Brownbul, Scaly Babbler and Grey and Collared Sunbirds were also very common. Coastal thickets This was a very extensive formation of the reserve, covering then at least 40 km? (from the southern boundary road near Ras Shaka, north-east to Buffalo camp in Baharini). They formed a massive block 4 to 5 km wide in the southern section, narrower in the north-east. This block came close to the seafront in the south, but elsewhere was sepa- rated from the dunes by a large ziwa at least 1 km wide (Fig. 1). The south-western corner (as shown on the map, Fig. 1) was in the process of being destroyed by illegal settlers. The height of the canopy was usually 5-6 m, and there was a scattering of taller trees emerging to 10-12 m, rarely more (15 m). Nearer the coast, the height of the can- Checklist of the birds of Kipini Conservancy, Kenya 3 opy decreased slightly to 3-4 m. The two main emergents were doum palms Hyphaene compressa and baobabs Adansonia digitata; other emergents were Terminalia spinosa, Lonchocarpus bussei and more rarely Tamarindus indica. The Terminalia and Lonchocar- pus could also be part of the canopy. The most numerous canopy species were by far Lecaniodiscus fraxinifolius and Carpodiptera africana. Lecaniodiscus was more common in dense thicket whereas Carpodiptera is more light-demanding, thus more frequent in slight gaps and generally on edges. Locally in the thickets there were depressions of black soil that became water-logged in the rains; they have a completely differ- ent vegetation, being dominated by one tree, Spirostachys venenifera, c. 10-12 m tall. oa Ber“ 2°25 - ‘ ae ‘. ‘ ’ LY ‘4 Luimshi ey errs ts eg LS Se, Lake *y, KIPINI 4 maji. \e2/Kenyotta, /* Grass ‘i CONSERVANCY | ue ae