SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER By ARTHUR M. BANT A Published by the Carnegie Institution of Washington Washington, 1921 (Sty 1. Jt. Ml ffiibrarg QH37I B3 £fartfj (Uaroltita g>tate (HalUg? NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES SO 932487 Y This book is due on the date indicated below and is subject to an overdue fine as posted at the circulation desk. EXCEPTION: Date due will be earlier if this item is RECALLED. # ^ 200M/06-99-991212 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER By ARTHUR M. BANTA Published by the Carnegie Institution of Washington Washington, 1921 CARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON. Publication No. 305. Paper No- 33 of the Department op Genetics. Andrew B. Graham Company Washington, D. C. CONTENTS. 20 24 /-. . Page ueneral statement 5 * Source of material q o Culture methods g x Pedigree records j j Method of selection 13 General procedure 13 Environmental influences and reaction- time 17 Test series lg Same-day broods 19 Possible criticisms of methods of selec- tion Nature of swimming movements of Cla- docera species used in selection . "» Behavior of young of the different species when released in the experimen- tal tank 24 Relation between environmental condi- tions and reproductive age 26 Statistical treatment of data 26 Analysis of data 28 Line 695 28 Presentation of data 28 Analysis of data for effect of selection 38 Relation between reproductive vigor and reactiveness to light 40 Line 689 46 Line 691 49 Line 711 51 Line 713 55 Line 714 56 Line 719 60 Line 751 66 Line 762 68 Line 766 70 Line 768 70 General introduction for Simocephalus exspinosus lines 73 Line 794 74 Line 795 77 Line 796 80 Line 740 84 Line 757 89 Presentation of data 89 Detailed analysis of data for Line 757 97 Reaction-time means compared by longer periods 97 Other features of the data 104 Relation between relative vigor and mean reaction-time 108 Analysis of data — Continued. Line 757 — Continued. Special features of the reaction-time curves 115 Extent of the change in reactiveness of the Line 757 plus strain 116 Reactiveness of both strains of Line 757 modified through selection. 118 Conclusion regarding effect of selection in Line 757 126 Environmental conditions as affecting reaction-time and vigor of stock 128 1. Temperature influences 128 2. Influence of substances exhaled from observer's breath 130 3. Relatively temporary chemical (?) differences in water used in ex- perimental tank 131 4. Occurrence of negatively reacting individuals 132 5. General influences operative through longer periods of time 132 Coincident changes in reactiveness . . 133 Seasonal changes in reactiveness. . . 135 Contemporaneous shifts in reaction- time means 135 General increase in reactiveness of Simocephalus exspinosus 137 Independent shifts in reaction-time means 140 Whether " depression periods " occur. 142 6. Environmental conditions as affect- ing vigor of stock 143 Reliability of the reproductive index. 143 Coincident fluctuations in vigor. ... 144 Independent fluctuations in vigor. . . 145 Differences between reproductive indices during different parts of experiment 146 Is the increased reactiveness for lines of Simocephalus exspinosus asso- ciated with increased vigor? .... 147 Possible divergence in vigor between the two strains of a selected line 148 Statement of results of selection 150 Discussion of results 152 N Summary 163 ^ References 169 » 1 17 LIST OF FIGURES. Page 1. Line 695. Reproductive vigor 42 A. Average number in first brood 42 B. Average age of mother at production of first brood 42 C. Reproductive indices, actual values 42 2. Line 095 43 A. Relative rates of descent of the two strains 43 B. Reproductive indices, superiority 43 C. Reaction-time curves 43 3. Line 689 48 A. Reproductive indices, actual values 48 B. Reproductive indices, superiority 48 C. Reaction-time curves 48 4. Line 691. Reaction-time curves 51 5. Line 711. Reaction-time curves 53 6. Line 713. Reaction-time curves 55 7. Line 714 58 A. Reproductive indices, actual values 58 B. Reproductive indices, superiority 58 C. Reaction-time curves 58 8. Line 719 64 A. Reproductive indices, actual values 64 B. Reproductive indices, superiority 64 C. Reaction-time curves 64 9. Line 751. Reaction-time curves 67 10. Reaction-time curves for lines of Daphtiia longispina and composite curves for all D. pulex lines 69 A. Line 762. Reaction-time curves 69 B. Line 766. Reaction-time curves 69 C. Line 768. Reaction-time curves 69 D. Composite curves for all D. pulex lines with curves for Line 751 super- imposed 69 11. Line 794 77 A. Reproductive indices, actual values 77 B. Reproductive indices, superiority 77 C. Reaction-time curves 77 12. Line 795 79 A. Reproductive indices, actual values 79 B. Reproductive indices, superiority 79 C. Reaction-time curves 79 13. Line 796 82 A. Reproductive indices, actual values 82 B. Reproductive indices, superiority 82 C. Reaction-time curves 82 14. Line 740 87 A. Reproductive indices, actual values 87 B. Reproductive indices, superiority 87 15. Line 740. Reaction-time curves with reaction-time curves for Line 757 super- imposed 87 16. Line 757. Relative rates of descent of the two strains 97 17. Line 757. Reproductive vigor 101 A. Average number in first brood 101 B. Average age of mother at production of first brood 101 C. Reproductive indices, actual values 101 18. Line 757 102 A. Reproductive indices, superiority 102 B. Reaction-time curves, with composite curves for all other Simocephalus exspinosus lines superimposed 102 19. Line 757. Reaction-time curves by six-month periods with similar curves for line 740 superimposed 103 LIST OF TABLES. 1. History of lines of Cladocera used in selection experiments 9 2. Data from an early test series of Line 695 to illustrate differences in general reactiveness to light on successive days 18 3. Summary of selection data by broods for Line 695 plus 29 4. Summary of selection data by broods for Line 695 minus 32 5. Selection data summarized by two-month periods for Line 695 plus 35 6. Selection data summarized by two-month periods for Line 695 minus 36 7. Selection summary for Line 695 37 8. Same-day broods. Summary of data for Line 695 38 9. Selection data summarized by two-month periods for Line 689 plus 46 10. Selection data summarized by two-month periods for Line 689 minus 46 11. Selection summary for Line 689 47 12. Same-day broods. Summary of data for Line 689 47 13. Selection summary for Line 691 49 14. Same-day broods. Summary of data for Line 691 50 15. Selection data summarized by two-month periods for Line 711 plus 51 16. Selection data summarized by two-month periods for Line 711 minus 52 17. Selection summary for Line 711 52 18. Same-day broods. Summary of data for Line 711 52 19. Selection summary for Line 713 54 20. Same-day broods. Summary of data for Line 713 54 21. Selection summary for Line 714 57 22. Same-day broods. Summary of data for Line 714 57 23. Selection data summarized by two-month periods for Line 719 plus 61 24. Selection data summarized by two-month periods for Line 719 minus 61 25. Selection summary for Line 719 62 26. Same-day broods. Summary of data for Line 719 62 27. Selection summary for Line 751 66 28. Same-day broods. Summary of data for Line 751 66 29. Selection summary for Line 762 68 30. Selection summary for Line 766 70 31. Selection summary for Line 768 71 32. Same-day broods. Summary of data for Line 768 71 33. Selection summary for Line 794 ' 74 34. Same-day broods. Summary of data for Line 794 74 35. Selection summary for Line 795 78 36. Same-day broods. Summary of data for Line 795 78 37. Selection summary for Line 796 81 38. Same-day broods. Summary of data for Line 796 81 39. Selection summary for Line 740 84 40. Same-day broods. Summary of data for Line 740 84 41. Summary of selection data by broods for Line 757 plus 91 42. Summary of selection data by broods for Line 757 minus 94 43. Selection data summarized by two-month periods for Line 757 plus 98 44. Selection data summarized by two-month periods for Line 757 minus 99 45. Selection summary for Line 757 46. Same-day broods. Summary of data for Line 757. 100 47. Summary of data for more reactive individuals of Line 757 107 48. Comparison of reaction-time means for the plus strain of Line 757 (within which selection was effective) with corresponding means for the plus strains for S. exspinosus lines in which selection was not effective (Line 740) and the shorter S. exspinosus lines. Lines 794, 795, and 796 ....... 119 49. Comparison of reaction-time means for the minus strain of Line 757 (within which selection was effective) with corresponding means for the minus strains for S. exspinosus lines in which selection was not effective (Line 740) and the shorter S. exspinosus lines. Lines 794, 795, and 796 121 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. GENERAL STATEMENT. For more than 8 years (January 1920) the writer has been rearing parthenogenetic "pure lines" of Cladocera. The original object of rearing this material was the conducting of experiments on selection within the pure line. These experiments were completed in May 1917. Data bearing on other problems have also been secured from the handling of this material. The selection experiments only will be treated in the present paper. The writer undertook the selection experiments in order to get additional data on the effects of selection within the pure line. The Cladocera material was chosen for several reasons: 1. It reproduces rapidly. 2. Under favorable conditions it is readily handled in the laboratory. 3. It reproduces parthenogenetically with (under carefully con- trolled conditions) no possible question as to the occurrence of sexual reproduction. 4. In the maturation of the parthenogenetic eggs of Cladocera there is a single division without reduction (Weismann, 1886; Kiihn, 1908). Hence with this material there are presumably no compli- cations of segregation during maturation or of fertilization as with sexually reproducing forms. 5. No selection experiments had been made with a purely physiological character as the basis for selection. Aside from the fact that a physiological character had probably not been used previously as a basis for studies on the effect of selection, a purely physiological character seemed desirable to use for two additional reasons: (a) Physiological differences are frequently readily measur- able and measurable in a precise way. Numerical series of measure- ments provide very usable series of data free from the errors of estimation and personal equation applying to series not directly numerical. The light reactions of Cladocera afford a character per- haps as definitely measurable as any readily handled physiological characteristic. (6) In both the ontogenetic and phylogenetic history of organisms physiological modifications may occur without observed morphological changes, and in the modification of organisms physio- logical modifications may readily precede distinguishable or measur- able morphological changes. This latter consideration (6) had the greatest weight in determining the use of a physiological character as the basis for these experiments. D. H. KILL LIBRARY North Carolina State College 6 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF The rapidly breeding, easily propagated, parthenogenetic organ- ism possessing a readily measurable physiological character afforded just the material desired. The experimental object was to attempt to isolate by selection, through a number of generations, a strain more responsive to light than a second strain from the same pure line1 selected for its reduced responsiveness to light.2 SOURCE OF MATERIAL. The Cladocera material to be considered in this paper was obtained from ponds near Cold Spring Harbor. Pond I is a surface- water pond in an open lot at an altitude of about 160 feet above tide- water. This is a temporary pond, some 60 by 40 feet in dimensions when moderately filled, and contains water only from early winter to May or somewhat later in the summer. Pond II was3 a permanent spring-fed pond in a shaded situation in the woods on a northeast slope. It was about one-fourth mile distant from Pond I, at an altitude of about 60 feet, was approximately 18 by 10 feet, and had a depth of only 10 inches. Pond III is another surface-water pond on the upland, three-eighths of a mile from Pond I. It overflows occasionally after excessive rains and frequently becomes dried up in summer.4 At its maximum it is approximately 65 by 40 feet, but it ordinarily contains less than a fourth of this area and does not exceed 2 feet in depth at its deepest portion. This pond is near and receives the surface drainage from a barnyard and a pasture lot. Hence it is rich in organic solution constituents. Pond IV is also a shallow surface-water pond. It is on the upland, an eighth of a mile from Pond I, ordinarily has an area of perhaps half an acre, and has become dry only once in the past 7 years. This pond also receives the surface drainage from a barnyard, but because of its larger drainage basin it is not so rich in organic solution constituents as Pond III. The Daphnia pulex material used in the selection experiments was obtained from Pond I (November 1911 and October 1912) and from Pond II (November 1911). Only two lines (689, 751) from Pond I were retained very long. The remainder of the lines of D. pulex used in these experiments came from Pond II, the small spring-fed pond in the woods. The D. longispina used in selection were derived from stock from Ponds I and IV. Collections were 'These were not "pure lines" in the narrowed sense of Johannsen's definition, but were clones in the sense adopted by Johannsen and his followers. The term "pure line" has not in the general mind been restricted to Johannsen's usage, however. Nevertheless, to avoid loose- ness of expression and possible misunderstanding, it might be wise to abandon this term to Johannsen's limited meaning and for a general term, embracing the Johannsen pure line and the clone, to adopt the term pure lineage or pure descent. 2 Two short notes relating to this series of experiments have been previously published (Banta, 1913, 1919). The references there made to Simocephalus vetulus should read Simo- cephalus exspinosus = vetulus. 3 It has since been drained. 4 It has become empty in the autumn three times in the last 7 years. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 7 made in October 1912, in Pond I, and in Pond IV in November 1913. The Simocephalus exspinosus material used in selection experiments was obtained from Pond IV, August 1912 and December 1914, and from Pond I, October 1912. The stock obtained from Pond I, the surface-water pond, had in all probability only recently undergone sexual reproduction. The pond ordinarily remains dry from early summer until October or November. If as much as 3 to 5 weeks had elapsed between the filling of the pond and November 16, when the latest collection from this pond was made, the daphnids could have descended at most only one or two generations, allowing several days for the (fertilized) ephippial eggs (produced before the pond became dried up in the spring) to develop and 2 weeks for each generation at out-door temperature at that season. It is indeed quite probable that the individuals collected were themselves ex-ephippial individuals. There is no safe criterion for determining how long the material obtained from Pond II (the spring-fed pond) may have reproduced parthenogenetically since the stock had last undergone sexual repro- duction previous to its being taken into the laboratory. However in this pond and in other small ponds in which this species has been observed it has not ordinarily been found to occur for more than 3 to 5 weeks at a time, so that probably this material had comparatively recently descended from ephippial eggs. There is likewise no way of determining how recently the stock collected from Pond IV had undergone sexual reproduction. D. longispina occurs in this pond occasionally, and, so far as observations go, seems not to continue there long at a time. S. exspinosus, however, is found there the year round. No males or sexual eggs of either species have been found in this pond.1 The five lines of S. exspinosus originated from five different mothers collected from two ponds and at three different times. There is some evidence (see page 123) that Line 757 (from Pond I, October 1912) at the beginning of selection differed in its reactive- ness from Line 740 (from Pond IV, August 1914). The progenitors of these two lines were obtained from different ponds and with a time-interval of about two months. The other lines (794, 795, and 796, from Pond IV, December 1914) of this species seemed not to differ in their reactiveness from each other or from Line 740 obtained two years earlier from the same pond. Possibly these four lines belonged to the same clone, while Line 757 belonged to a different clone. It is possible that sexual reproduction may not occur in the pond from which these four lines (740, 794, 795, and 796) were obtained, and they may all have come from a commoD progenitor. While the material was not examined with this point in mind, 1 For the purpose of these experiments it is presumably quite immaterial at what time the Inst previous sexual reproduction had occurred. 8 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF between 60 and 100 collections of S. exspinosus material from this pond were made at intervals of several days and no males or ephippial females were found. Males might readily be overlooked in col- lections not carefully examined microscopically, but ephippial females are unlikely to be overlooked by one who is accustomed to handling Cladocera material. However, sexual reproduction in Cladocera is spasmodic and frequently of short duration, so that the results of the examination of the collections do not entirely preclude the possibility (though making it seem improbable) that sexual reproduction may actually have occurred during the period of fre- quent examinations of material from this pond. The same general reactiveness appeared to exist in all D. pulex lines (see figs. 2c, 3c, 4, 5, 6, 7c, 8c, 9, and 10d), although they came from two ponds (Pond I and Pond II), were collected at different times, and presumably may have belonged to more than one clone. Sexual reproduction in this species was several times noted in a nearby pond (Pond III) from which the culture-water was obtained. Table 1 shows in condensed form certain data concerning the lines of Cladocera reared in the laboratory and used for the selection experiments. CULTURE METHODS. The culture-water in which these animals were reared was at first obtained from the spring-fed pond (Pond II). Beginning a year and a half later, it was gotten from Pond III, the barnyard pond. This pond receives all its water from the surface drainage of a small pasture lot and from a barn and barnyard in which live-stock is kept. The amount of organic matter carried into the pond by the surface drainage is relatively large and the water is rich in organic solution constituents. The water is usually heavily colored a reddish or yellowish brown. In being collected, the culture-water is dipped up in a manner to obtain as much as possible of the loose, fluffy sediment from the bottom of the pond. After being brought into the laboratory it is strained through fine "India linen." The lighter portion of the sediment is gently rubbed through the straining-cloth and the coarser residue is discarded. The strained water is then allowed to stand for two days, when it is again (sediment included) strained through India linen. After a second interval of from one to several days the water is thoroughly stirred and a third straining is made through a standard silk bolting-cloth having 130 meshes to the inch. The water is then ready for use as culture-water. The first straining removes any Cladocera or Copepoda which may be in the pond- water and removes most (at least) of their eggs. The second strain- ing removes any young which as eggs may have passed through the A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 9 .2SS5 £ 3 - © a, g*a io*i< coco -TCOIO CO CO CO noGffioooOHHH CNCNicocor»t-.cococa>a505 S P. "2 .s a o eo o e eo e a. k O o CO c O >OiOO>0>OC»'0>OCOC0050c01't^t»COCOCDiOCNC»OOOOOOOOC»CnO>0030 (]H rt »H f-l CN •■* ^* r-H I— I ** FN —* ^H a "2— 4> 0943 n co so o o o 3 CO — o • is- 3 a ■ -V. CO m to ' o •T3 a 08 o a CO o O O O O M a , V CO o - o a -3 :-e ID O .2 8 : IB CO • o ■o .-o o o> 8 -8 ' o » o u o O 0 o 0 to to to m £* O O O O X _5_3hMW coooONOHOiooiDOioOQoono DO 3 ."3 -5 ■—> ■ a ■ 3 ■•-9 J3 qJ3 o J3 o'-JS OJ3 d^3 O-S O IN OS 00^.00 i-iT3 rtTJ O) Oio o 2 :S ooo'oio or- oooOi-hOooo CNTJcN'O •OCNTlcN'O "OCN"0 c- - - &3 °go cS O a be J3 c '3 CO fa "O o"0 o"0 d"0 d"2 d"H d"2 d"2 - ft, .'ft, :fa -ft, -fa -fa -ft, -ft. i-l o» 1-1 • 1-t OS -OS * o G> op ' •& & &• :H fa W • "t^ r^ t^ ! ■ i»i i^ ^H . • Oi o Ol • • f-4 rn *"' ; H . H C5 -OS OiOtN 0»-< O^h 0»-h Oh 0»-t O T3(NT3 T3 T3 T3 TJ t3 "13 0*j Or O-!: Ol; O CO -»o co o« or- oco oio ouo ooo o F0«-4"0^^'T3CN'3'H'0»-'*O»-i'0 "2 o"2 o"2 o"2 o g"13 oS o73. o"0 ft, .ft, .ft, .ft, •So fa "2 d"2 d"2 d a-o c^ a^, fa -fa -fa on ooo" obj"oo>on" o us £<££**£**£'*£ «."Ok.*Ok.OrtON OCN OCN OOO OOl OC> OCN omocnu-HU^-i^— u O •z > ■ > o ■ o ■z :z > ■ > o ■ O Z -Z. > ■ M 5 vlilililili'iiaizzaza ia si si s.s si sj SSSiiEiifaiSfaiSfaSfaSfaSfaSfaSfaSfaSfaSfaSfa^faS a 3 lllgggggggg o r- t- r- o c. cs t- t- r- xajnd -q wndsi3noj 'ci fmsonidexa 'g 10 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF cloth on the first straining, they, meantime, having had time to develop before the later straining. The third straining is probably quite unnecessary, but is used as an added precaution. The culture-water contains a small amount of the original (now thrice-strained) sediment, has much material in suspension and in solution, and is dull brownish-gray in color. It settles and clears slowly, so that young daphnids placed in the culture-bottles are visible only with difficulty for a day or two. The animals when collected were isolated in 200-c. c. wide- mouthed bottles filled to a depth of near 5 cm. (about 100 c. c. in quantity) with culture-water. The young of the first brood from the wild mother were transferred during the first day of life to indi- vidual bottles. A single individual each was placed in the No. 1 and the No. 2 bottles, while three or more were placed in a third bottle designated as a "prime" bottle to serve as reserve stock. Transfers were made in like manner in subsequent generations, except that Sunday's broods were transferred Monday, when one day old. The bottles of the parent generation were retained as additional reserve stock until a second descendent generation was obtained. The grandmother generation was then discarded, a few individuals being preserved for morphological study if later desired.1 For many months after the cultures were begun, and at frequent intervals afterward, large samples of the culture-water, after its three strainings, were set aside in glass jars. Observations were made to determine if daphnids of any sort developed in this water from eggs passing through the straining-cloth or in any way introduced by accident during its handling. None appeared at any time. In addition to the three strainings of the culture-water and the general precautions observed in handling the stock, the system of handling the material in itself served to check out any possible con- tamination. The No. 1 and No. 2 bottles each contained a single individual and the prime bottles three or more individuals. Any contamination must have been detected, except in the case of an individual of the same species and very nearly the same age in a No. 1 or No. 2 bottle in which the individual belonging in the bottle died within a day after having been placed therein. The likelihood of the coincidence of the introduction of an individual of the same age and of the same species into a bottle in which the rightful individual died within a day is so slight as to arouse little concern. If contami- nation occurred in a prime bottle, to escape ready detection it would have to be an individual of the same species and of very nearly the same age as the individuals belonging in the bottle. Further, the 1 In case the No. 1 individual is lost, young are transferred from the No. 2 bottle, or if the No. 1 and No. 2 are both lost, the transfers are made from the prime bottle. In case the prime too is lost, extra transfers are made from the first or a later brood of the No. 1 or other surviving individual of the parent generation, and young from one of these transfers are used to start the new generation. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 11 chances would be 3 to 1 (since there are three or more individuals belonging in the prime bottle) against young from the strange indi- vidual being used in propagating the line in the unlikely contingency of this bottle being used to continue the line. These facts, combined with the fact that the prime bottles were used only occasionally (when the No. 1 and No. 2 individuals had died) in propagating the strains, make the chances greatly against the perpetuation of a con- tamination of a pure lime, if such a contamination ever did occur. With a single exception,1 which was readily detected, we have every reason to believe that our selection cultures did not at any time be- come contaminated by the introduction of daphnids in the culture- water or by any other means.2 PEDIGREE RECORDS. All the descendants of each of the "wild" individuals originally taken into the laboratory are referred to as belonging to a single line, while any subdivisions of the stock within this line are designated as strains. Thus, of each of the lines in which selection on the basis of light reactions was made, there were plus and minus strains, while of certain lines there were several additional strains, all of the strains of any line of course having descended in the laboratory from a single "wild" individual. In the records each line is referred to by a certain arbitrary number. The generation of its descent since having been brought into the laboratory is indicated by a letter followed by a subscript. The plus and minus strains are indicated by the plus or minus signs. Thus 695 Dn— indicates reference to the 264th generation (the letters of the alphabet having been used ten times over and to the letter D on the eleventh time) of the minus strain of Line 695. 3 Notes were made on loose-leaf sheets, a sheet being used for the notes for the three bottles (No. 1, No. 2, and "prime") of each gener- ation of each strain. Records on this sheet include the pedigree designation, the pedigree of the mother from which the young were derived, and the date of birth of the young, all made at the time of making the transfer. Later, the date of occurrence and (usually) 1 In one case, early in the course of these experiments, a strange daphnid did appear in one of the culture-bottles. It was a small, rapidly reproducing form, the eggs of which might conceivably be pressed through the straining-cloth, young developed to maturity, and eggs of the next generation produced before the second straining. It was readily recognized as an inter- loper. Such an appearance, even had it been that of a stray individual of the species under cul- tivation, would have been readily detected and leads to no great concern as to the purity of our cultures. 2 In a few instances two individuals were found in a No. 1 or a No. 2 bottle, due to the lifting out in the pipette of two (instead of one) individuals from the mother's bottle or from the experimental tank when making the transfers. The prompt finding of the extra individual added to our confidence in the purity of our cultures, but in every case the bottle in which an extra individual was found was discarded. Since in these cases the extra individual was not of another strain, but merely an extra individual of the same strain, its presence in the bottle did not represent a threatened contamination. 3 It is to be noted that the minus strains are strains selected for reduced reactiveness to light. No negatively reacting strains occur. 12 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF the number of young in the first brood and the date of occurrence of the second brood from the No. 1 mother were recorded. The transfer of young to the next descendent generation was noted for the appropriate mother, as was also the later discarding of the bottles and the preservation of individuals from the No. 1 bottle. The record of transfers made was given on the mother's as well as the daughter's sheet. This double checking served as a safeguard in case of any deficiency or discrepancy in the notes. Similar, but less complete, records were made for the No. 2 and prime bottles. The data obtained in conducting the light tests for determining the individuals to be selected was recorded in a separate note-book. Any discrepancy as to the number in a given brood, its pedigree designation, date of birth, etc., could again be checked by reference to this book, so that in reality a three-entry system of note-keeping was utilized. Very few discrepancies or deficiencies in the notes have been found, and these were readily cleared up.1 A sample sheet of the loose-leaf notes is appended, and also a page of the experimental-room notes. Copy of pedigree sheet of loose-leaf notes. Copy of page from experimental note-book. 695 F6- No. 1. 695 F6- No. 1. 10/20/14 From 695 E6- No. : L. 10/13/14. Temperature, 19.9°. Oct. 20, 14 young. Distributed to Time, 2 : 10 : 00. 695 G6-. 1 2 :12:11, + Oct. 23, 2d brood. 2 12 : 15, + Oct. 31, preserved. 3 4 13 : 03, + 13:05, + 695 F6- No. 2. 5 13 : 27, + Oct. 20, 13 young. 6 12 : 27, + Oct. 23, 2d brood. 7 14 : 00, + Oct. 27, discarded. 8 9 14 : 50, + 15:05, + 695 Fir. 10 15 : 50, + Oct. 20, young. 11 18 : 00, + Oct. 27, discarded. 12 19 : 55, + 13 over- time. 14 over-time. 1 However, for the sake of complete safety, it was considered wise to keep up the three- entry method of keeping notes. It did not prove unduly laborious. In any case, a new sheet must be made for each set of three new bottles of the new generation, and naturally the notes on the light tests required the entry of several of the items placed in the experimental note-book. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 13 METHOD OF SELECTION. General Procedure. Propagation of the older lines of D. pulex had progressed from 5 to 8 generations before the selection experiments were begun. Selection with lines later used was begun at once upon introduction into the laboratory. The culture-bottles were given uniform treatment so far as possible. The plus and minus strains of the same line were kept side by side on the table. The only obvious environmental differ- ences to which the two strains of the same line were subjected arose from the fact that the young from the two strains were transferred to new food, usually on different days. While every effort was made to provide uniform culture-water, only a moderate degree of uni- formity was attainable, but this unavoidable difference in environ- mental treatment was not differential, and in the long run should have affected the two strains equally. Unlike the Cladocera material reared under laboratory con- ditions by many workers, the writer's material produced exclusively asexual young, there being with the material subjected to selection no discovered case in which males or sexual eggs were produced. The selection tests were conducted in a darkened basement room with dull-black walls. The tank was constructed of plate glass, the bottom being a heavy slab of smooth slate, grooved out to a depth of about 1.5 cm., the grooves being about 2 cm. wide. The plate-glass sides and ends were set in these grooves in an aqua- rium cement. The grooves were filled with the cement so as to leave a smooth surface continuous with the surface of the slab. The lines of contact of the glass sides and ends were cemented together with thick Canada balsam. After the aquarium cement and balsam had been given several days for hardening, the surface of the cement and the inside of the glass sides of the tank were coated with a mix- ture of lampblack, balsam, and turpentine. The result was a tank with uniform dull-black sides and bottom and with transparent ends. The tank measured inside 40 cm. by 26.6 cm. and was 7.2 cm. in depth. An improvement on this tank would be made by substituting thin slabs of smooth slate for the plate-glass sides. The source of light was at first a slender, cylindrical, carbon- filament, incandescent lamp. Later similar carbon-filament lamps could not be obtained and a tungsten lamp was used. The lamps used varied from 43.5 to 75.9 candle-power. They were placed at 14 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF the appropriate distances from the tank to obtain an illumination of 120 candle-meters, calculated to the middle of the tank.1 The heat-screen, 4.5 cm. thick, with parallel glass sides and filled with distilled water, was placed at the end of the tank through which the illumination was received. An upright black cardboard screen was placed between the heat-screen and the end of the tank, so as to permit rays of light to enter the end of the tank only in the area between the bottom of the tank and the level of the surface of the water. The water within the tank was filtered pond-water and was maintained at a depth of 1.8 cm. Fresh water was placed in the tank each day and a change of water was made after testing and selecting from each four broods. The young animals to be tested, consisting of entire first broods, were removed from the mothers' bottles by means of a small pipette, and taken to the experimental room in 10 mm. cylindrical vials. The vials were placed in a wire basket arid immersed to about 3 cm. depth in a dish of water of the same temperature as the water in the experimental tank and left about an hour before the tests were begun. The temperature of the experimental room varied from 14° C. during the coldest weather in winter to sometimes as high as 22° C. in summer. Very rarely the temperature was as low as 10° C. or as high as 24° C. In preparation for the testing of each brood, the entire brood was (by means of the small pipette) placed in the center of the experimental tank within an upright cylinder of glass 1 cm. in diam- eter. The experimental light was turned on and all extraneous light was eliminated. The animals were then left undisturbed within this cylinder for 2 minutes, when the cylinder was lifted care- fully from the water, thus releasing the animals in the center of the tank; the temperature of water and time of release of the animals were recorded just before the release. The illumination within the water was sufficient to make the young daphnids just visible to the eye of one accustomed to working with them. As soon as a daphnid reached either end of the tank it was removed and the time of its arrival recorded, together with the proper sign to indicate to which end of the tank it had gone (see page 12). The interval between the release of the animal and its arrival at the end of the tank is referred 1 No allowance was made for the diminution in amount of light due to its passage through the heat-screen, the plate-glass end of the tank, and the water within, nor was allowance made for the somewhat different results in illumination due to using lamps of different candle- power. While the distances at which the lamps were used were such as to give a calculated illumination of 120 candle-meters at the middle of the tank, the illumination at the ends of the tank would of course be somewhat different with the lamps differing in candle-power. This fact was not taken into consideration in originally substituting a GO-watt Mazda lamp (about 75.3 candle-power) for the carbon-filament lamp of 43.5 candle-power. Having for a time used the lamp with the higher candle-power, it was considered wise to continue its use. Any variation in absolute intensity of the light at the different parts of the tank is regrettable, but it should of course be equally effective with the plus and minus strains and presumably could not disturb the course of the experiments. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 15 to as its reaction-time.1 The test was continued for 15 minutes, unless all individuals had reached an end of the tank earlier; any remaining at the end of 15 minutes were removed and arbitrarily assigned a reaction-time of 15 minutes.2 Another brood was then tested in a like manner. In testing a brood of the plus strain, the individual first reaching the positive end of the tank was at once placed in a separate vial and later transferred to the No. 1 bottle of the new generation. The second one to reach the positive end was likewise placed in a separate vial, to be later transferred to the No. 2 bottle. The others were returned to the vial in which they had been conveyed to the experi- mental room. Three or more of these were later transferred to the "prime " bottle of the new generation. With the broods of the minus strains the procedure was the same, except that the two quickest to reach the negative end, the two which moved farthest toward the negative end, the two moving least toward the positive end of the tank, or the two slowest in reaching the positive end were selected for the No. 1 and No. 2 bottles of the new generation. Negatively reacting individuals did not occur in most of the broods, nor were there usually individuals which showed any tendency to react nega- tively to light. With D. pulex and D. longispina few individuals failed to move to the positive end within the limits of the experiment. Hence very frequently in the minus strains the No. 1 and No. 2 individuals selected were respectively the one slowest and the one next slowest in reaching the positive end of the tank. As with the data for the over-time individuals, the data for the negatively reacting individuals presented some difficulty. The occurrence of negatively reacting individuals was irregular and more or less spasmodic. Table 2 presents some data illustrating this point. Reference to any of the tables presenting the data by broods will show that when negatively reacting individuals occur they are frequently relatively numerous. The writer believes negatively re- acting individuals are (usually, at any rate) influenced by some unusual environmental factor and that an individual's swimming lrThe "reaction-time" as recorded in the notes and used in this paper indicates, in seconds, the interval between the release of the young daphnid from the glass cylinder in the middle of the experimental tank and the time at which it reached the end of the tank. Strictly speaking, this is the real reaction-time — the time consumed in the beginning of movement and estab- lishing orientation with reference to the light — plus the time consumed by the animal in swimming to the end of the tank. 2 The arbitrary assumption of 15 minutes as the reaction-time of individuals which as a matter of fact did not react within that length of time is open to criticism, but no better method of utilizing this significant portion of the data was ascertained. The "over-time" individuals can not be disregarded. The data for them are obviously very significant. In a slightly reactive strain, such as the minus strain of Line 757, they constitute a large portion of the individuals tested and represent a striking manifestation of the low responsiveness to light in this as in other strains. As pointed out in another connection, the arbitrary assumption of 900 seconds for their reaction-times greatly minimizes the rightful influence upon mean reaction-time of their slight or non-reactiveness to light. 16 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF to the negative end of the tank does not in most cases really indicate a negative phototropism. Such individuals, if tested a second time, do not ordinarily repeat the behavior.1 The best interpretation seemed to be that individuals which reacted negativel}' were stimu- lated by the light as their sisters were, but that a "negative" re- sponse was ordinarily called forth by some accessory influence. Occasionally this additional influence obviously was accidental mechanical stimulation; but usually negative responses could not be thus accounted for, and often they were certainly not due to this cause. The data for negatively reacting individuals were treated as though the individuals had reacted positively, except that the number of such occurrences was tabulated and is frequently referred to in the treatment of the data. It is questionable if, in making selections in the minus strains, one was justified in selecting individuals (where such a selection was possible) which went to the negative end of the tank. Cladocera are so generally positive that negative reactions are at once open to a question as to significance, but it is believed that the possibility of an actual change or mutation producing a really negatively reacting individual is sufficient justification for selecting these individuals in the minus strains. In case a daphnid remained unaccounted for at the end of the test of a brood, the tank was emptied, twice carefully rinsed, and filled to the proper depth with fresh water. At all times in the experiments every conceived precaution was taken to exclude extraneous light, to guard against reflection from any object without or small foreign body within the tank, to eliminate all mechanical stimulation, and particularly to guard against the possible mis- placing of an individual daphnid in the handling of the broods.2 In brief, in the selection experiments the entire first brood, soon after its release from the mother's brood-pouch, was removed from the culture-bottle, placed in a small vial, taken to a darkened room, and subjected to known and always uniform directive light- stimulation under carefully controlled conditions, the object being to attempt to procure (by selection through many generations) a strain more responsive to light than a second strain from the same 'In the plus strain of Line 757 minus individuals occurred in 17 broods out of 172 broods from which selections were made. In 4 of these cases there were more than a single minus indi- vidual (19 individuals in 4 broods). In the minus strain of Line 757 minus individuals occurred in 13 of 175 actual selection tests, and in one of these cases there were 3 minus individuals (table 42). 2 The pipette in which the daphnids were handled was carefully rinsed after handling each brood. In conducting the selections the vials to receive the selected animals were arranged so that the one nearest at hand was the one in which the next individual removed from the tank was to be placed. A small opening was made in the cardboard screen in order to permit a small amount of light to fall upon the observer's watch and note-book. The pipette could readily be examined in this light and the animal seen within it, in case there was any doubt about the daphnid having been drawn into the pipette when its removal from the tank was attempted. The table on which the experiments were conducted was closed off from the remainder of the room by a black curtain. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 17 line selected for its less responsiveness to light. In the beginning of this selection the most responsive individual from the first brood of the young mother was selected for the beginning of the plus strain and the least reactive one or, perchance, one reacting negatively and avoiding the light, for the beginning of the minus strain. In the next and later generations selections were made from the first broods (except in cases where the first brood was lost), the two most reactive individuals in the plus and the two least reactive individuals (or negatively reacting individuals if such occurred) in the minus strain being selected to propagate and continue their respective strains. At certain periods during the course of these experiments the rearing of the various strains was rendered difficult by poor food conditions. Sometimes during such periods selections were not made on the basis of reaction to light, but the individuals used to continue the strains were taken at random from the mother's bottle. In the tables giving the data by broods, such cases (and a few others in which for some reason the selection test was not con- ducted) are indicated as "random distributions." Environmental Influences and Reaction-Time. The tables of data obtained in making the selections show that there were wide differences in the general reactiveness of different broods tested in making the selections (see tables 3 and 4). Some- times a brood had an unusually low or an unusually high mean re- action-time, when perhaps the immediately preceding and next succeeding broods of the same strain had a mean near that for the strain as a whole. Sometimes a considerable number of a single brood reacted negatively, although on the whole only a small percentage of the individuals reacted negatively. Occasionally it was noted that all the broods on a certain day responded slowly to light stimulation, while perhaps on the following day all responded promptly. These differences are due to environmental factors. Table 2 illustrates this point, as well as the spasmodic occurrence of negatively reacting individuals. Reference to this table shows that on August 29, 1913, the mean reaction-time of 87 individuals of Line 695 tested was 401 seconds, and 3.5 per cent reacted negatively; on the following day the mean reaction-time was 636 seconds and 1.6 per cent were negative; on the day following this the mean reaction-time was 398 seconds and 28 per cent were negative. Thus, on the second of these three days the individuals of the same strains were slower in their reactions, compared with the other two days, by approximately 60 per cent. And there were twice and 18 times as large percentages of negatively reacting individuals on the first and third as on the second of these days.1 iThis is an extreme case, but it illustrates differences such as were reputedly observed, though usually to a much less marked degree. 18 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF Such differences in response indicate environmental factors of great influence, but what these influences were was in most cases not determined. It was frequently noted, in the tests at the begin- ning of these experiments, that after the observer had tested several broods in succession the broods tested later reacted less quickly than the earlier ones. This may have been due to the accumulation in the water of C02 from the observer's breath. The difficulty was obviated by changing the water in the experimental tank after testing each four broods. These and other factors were much too influential for one to ignore them completely, but their influence was presumably a horizontal one, affecting all the individuals of a brood and of the different strains in the same manner and not in any way influencing selections, except as affecting the reaction-time and in causing a few Table 2. — Data from an early test series of Line 695 to illustrate differences in general reactiveness to light on successive days. Mother's pedigree. No. of young. No. of nega- tively react- ing individuals. Percentage of negative individuals. Mean reaction-time in seconds. By broods. By days. Aug. 29, 1913. 695 E3 - No. 91.... 695 I3 + No. 5 695 I3 + No. 6 Totals, etc 695 I3 + No. 9 695 E3 - No. 2 695 E3 - No. 10 695 I3 + No. 12 695 E3 - No. 7 695 Is + No. 11 695 I3 + No. 13 695 Es - No. 4 695 I3 + No. 1 695 E3 - No. 9 695 I3 + No. 8 Totals, etc 26 23 38 1 0 2 448 555 276 Aug. 30, 1913. 87 3 3.5 401 22 21 23 23 27 33 21 20 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 346 631 704 710 577 766 761 526 Aug. 31, 1913 190 3 1.6 636 22 17 11 10 2 0 4. 350 396 498 50 14 398 'This is mother No. 9 of the fifty -seventh generation of the minus strain of Line 695. individuals which otherwise would have been positive to be rendered negative in their reactions. It seems wise to postpone the detailed analysis of the effects of environment upon reaction-time and upon vigor until after the general analysis of the data has been presented (see pages 128-149). Test Series. Because of the various factors instrumental in influencing the reactions of the different broods of Cladocera, and in order to obtain a critical measure of the effect of selection, if such occurred, so-called A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 19 test series were planned. These test series were conducted under a plan by which large numbers of broods of the plus and the minus strains of the same line were experimented upon on the same day and as nearly as was experimentally possible under precisely the same conditions. The plan was as follows: First, it was necessary to wait until such time as the plus and minus strains of the same line reproduced on the same day. A number of these young, from 12 to 20, of each of the strains were then transferred to individual bottles, given the same food, kept grouped together on the same table, and in every way treated alike. When their first broods appeared, four broods of equal or nearly equal size — two from the plus and two from the minus strain — were chosen, the choice being limited to broods released from the mother's brood-pouch within 2 or 3 hours of the same time. Thus we had broods containing equal or nearly equal numbers of individuals, of the same age (within 2 or 3 hours), and from mothers of the same age which had themselves received identical treatment from birth; other "quartettes" were selected in like manner. Further, the four broods, constituting a quartette, were handled in a definite order; a plus brood was experimented with first, then a minus brood, then the second minus brood of the quar- tette, and finally the second plus brood was tested. The tank was then emptied and replenished with fresh water. The second quar- tette was handled in reverse order: first a minus brood, then (in order) the two plus broods, and the second minus brood. The next quartette was then handled in the order indicated for the first quar- tette. Still other quartettes of broods were chosen from the second and later broods of the test-series mothers until the numbers of in- dividuals tested from each strain were quite large — in most cases larger than 600 and in several cases in excess of 1,000. The test-series, it was hoped, might serve as a means of eliminat- ing most of the disturbing factors unquestionably present during the reaction-tests, due to the fact that the selections in the plus strain and the minus strain of the same line were usually, through necessity, made on different days. Same-Day Broods. The two strains of the same line only occasionally reproduced on the same day, so that consecutive reaction-tests of a brood of each of these two strains were not ordinarily possible; however, during the whole course of the selection experiments, there were a number of selections in the plus and minus strains of the same line on the same dtays. In addition to the complete tabulation, the data for these "same-day" broods are tabulated separately. Such a tabulation for the two strains of Line 695 is given in table 8. Such a comparison of the mean reaction-times of the same-day broods ought perhaps to afford a safer criterion of the effectiveness of 20 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF selection (if an effect be obtained) than a summary of the entire selection data. The difficulty is that the amount of this data is so limited. For example, there are only 41 of these same-day broods for Line 695, out of a total of 192 broods of the plus strain and 180 broods of the minus strain for which data were secured. Possible Criticisms of Methods of Selection. Certain possible criticisms of the methods used in the selection experiments occurred to the writer and doubtless may occur to others. 1. Was there assurance that the individual daphnids selected were really the most and the least positively reacting individuals in their respective broods? (a) Was there reason to think that the individual daphnid first reaching the positive end of the tank was the one most influenced by the light? (b) May not this individual have been affected by a slight swirl in the water in being released from the cylinder or in some other manner subjected to mechanical stimu- lation? (c) Or may it have been affected differently from its fellows, due to some other condition external to itself? (d) Or may it have been influenced by some internal factor or factors and consequently its reaction determined by some " physiological state?" (e) Or may its reaction-time not have been influenced by its general vigor or by its ability as a swimmer? (/) Was the method of handling such as in any manner to unfavorably affect the animals and thus render their activities untrustworthy? 2. If the individual selected was really the most positively photo- tactic at the time of the selection, was it also the most positively phototactic an hour or a day later? 3. Was the selection method used calculated to produce a more vigorous race as compared with a less vigorous race? 4. Assuming real and lasting differences in light-reaction be- tween sibs, are these differences heritable anyway? If one accepted these possible criticisms in their fullest impli- cation it would at once be seen that the results here set forth were impossible of attainment, and the result with Line 757 is perhaps sufficient answer to these questions. The writer does not believe that these possible criticisms are at all damaging to or can be right- fully applied to these experiments; however, they will be discussed individually. (1) and (a) under it will be discussed after its sub- sidiary questions, (b) to (/), have been considered. (b) Observations directed upon the effect of mechanical stimu- lation show that a daphnid when mechanically stimulated usually moves promptly and rapidly; frequently the movement is from the source of mechanical stimulation if that is directive; but if non- directive, the movement is equally prompt and vigorous, though usually not different in direction from that in which the animal was A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 21 previously oriented. In either case the effect is ordinarily very temporary. In the vast majority of cases, in making the selections, when the cylinder was lifted to release the animals the daphnids at first failed to move at all or moved very slowly and only later began swimming or increased the rate of movement. In spite of all precautions, doubtless some individuals were mechanically stimulated and thus influenced in their reactions; occasionally such was obviously the case. But while such stimulation might influence the rate of move- ment and occasionally the direction of movement, these effects were temporary and the occurrences of such influences were to all appear- ances infrequent, so that it is believed the aggregate effect of such influences upon the selections is of little or no significance. (c) Unquestionably it is true that even when every precaution is taken to secure uniformity of conditions and to eliminate all extraneous light, to eliminate disturbances of the direction of the incident rays of light, to prevent mechanical or other accessory stimulation, and to provide uniformity in handling the animals, etc., perfect conditions are not attainable. Imperfect experimental con- trol of environmental conditions is obvious enough and is referred to elsewhere in this paper (see pages 15, 17-20, and 128-149). But there are no grounds for assuming that these imperfectly controlled environ- mental conditions were differential or in any appreciable way affected the selections. To assume that in any considerable number of the selec- tions differential stimulation occurred would, we believe, go beyond the facts and be quite unwarranted. (d) It is obvious that conditions internal to the animals them- selves are not subject to complete control. The writer does not doubt that " physiological states'' were occasionally a factor, and sometimes a determining factor, in individual selections, but he does not believe that internal conditions were frequently a determining factor. In cases of repeated tests of the reaction-times of a number of individual daphnids, sometimes several hours or even 2 or 3 days apart, the later results usually agreed with the earlier results — i. e., the animals which at the first test were most responsive to the light on subsequent tests were the most responsive or among the most responsive individuals. Hence there is excellent reason for believing that the individuals selected were actually the most responsive and the least responsive individuals of their respective broods. But assuming that temporary physiological states did sometimes influence the selections (as must occasionally have been the case), it would merely operate to render the selections less effective, and unless the internal temporary physiological factors were factors in a prevailing number of the selections, they could not neutralize the selections. (e) The individuals selected in the plus strains may have been merely the best swimmers, regardless of general vigor, or they may 22 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF have been the most vigorous individuals of their respective broods; but on the whole there seems no good reason for believing this to have been the case. If the differences were merely differences in quickness of movement or swimming ability, it would be quite as interesting to develop "hare" and "tortoise" strains of Cladocera as to develop strains more reactive and less reactive to light; and the result would have the same fundamental bearing on the problem of selection within the pure line. That the reaction-times of the vast majority of individuals were not influenced by differences in vigor is attested by the fact that there is no consistent relation between vigor (as measured by the mean reproductive index) and mean re- action-time. This point is discussed more fully in connection with the detailed analysis of the data for the various lines. (/) The strains subjected to selection did not show greater mortality nor less vigorous growth and reproductive ability than those lines not used in the selection experiments. The only difference in conditions through which those selected (as compared with those strains not subjected to selection) passed previous to being placed in the experimental tank was being placed for a time in a relatively small amount of the culture-water. There is no reason to think that this profoundly affected their light-reactions, or if it had, that the effect would not have been a horizontal rather than a differential one. (1) and (la) On numerous occasions the individuals of a brood were caused to react in the experimental tank a number of times. Of course, on second and subsequent trials only a single individual could be handled at one time in the tank because of the danger of mistaking the identity of the individuals. Of 10 such experiments, conducted within a few days and includ- ing all such experiments made within those clays, there was com- plete agreement in reaction order in 6 experiments; in 3 there was fair agreement, and in 1 there was very poor agreement in reaction order. Even in the last-mentioned case, however, the individuals which reacted more quickly during the first test in general reacted more quickly on the average of all the trials, but the reaction order was greatly changed. The objection that the selections in general may have been made on the basis of vigor of individuals has been, we think, effectively discounted. In view of this fact, it is believed that such consistent results as those just indicated show conclusively that neither physiological states nor any other factor operated to obviate or hamper the selection on the basis of fundamental indi- vidual differences in reactiveness to light. It is believed that in the vast majority of cases the two selected in the plus strains were more reactive to the illumination to which they were subjected than their fellows, and that those selected in the minus strain were less positive than their fellows. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 23 2. This point bears on the question of the occurrence of "physio- logical states" and their relative frequency. The discussion of (1) and (la) bears directly on this point. 3. To the possible objection that the method of selection was suited to the production of more vigorous strains in the plus and less vigorous strains in the minus strains, the answer is that such a result did occur to some extent in two of the lines, but it was not a cumu- lative result and the differences in reproductive vigor were not greater at the close than during the early part of the experiment. These cases are discussed in detail in the analysis of the data for the various lines. But, as is pointed out later, in those cases in which reduced reproductive vigor did occur it was not causally associated with differences in reaction-time. 4. This question, as applied to the selection problem, is a "leading" question. Its answer depends upon whether the differences are germinal or purely somatic. In the vast majority of cases such reaction differences as are encountered in these selection experiments are probably purely somatic, and the effect of selecting such variants is of course nil. Whether some of these reaction differences are due to germinal modifications will be taken up in connection with the experimental data considered in this publication. 24 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF NATURE OF SWIMMING MOVEMENTS OF CLADOCERA SPECIES USED IN SELECTION. Daphnia pulex is rather rotund in form and is only slightly heavier than water. It swims by vigorous strokes with perceptible intervals between, thus producing a very jerky movement. It is pelagic in its habits, and ordinarily its swimming strokes are repeated just frequently enough to maintain its level in the water. When loco- motion occurs the animal orients itself differently, i. e., instead of its antero-dorsal axis being approximately vertical, it changes to ap- proach a horizontal position with dorsal side uppermost; its swimming movements are more rapidly repeated and the animal's course may be fairly straight. The jerky character of movement is still quite in evidence. This species frequently attaches to the surface film of the water, but almost never to the sides of the container. A vigorous individual rarely or never rests upon the bottom. D. longispina is very similar to D. pulex in its habits and move- ments, but is more slender and somewhat less active; it is not quite so heavy; its axis does not so nearly assume a vertical position in its "place-maintaining" movements; and in its locomotion its move- ments are somewhat less jerky, due to its relatively smaller antennae and less vigorous strokes. Like D. pulex, it is distinctly pelagic and does not rest upon the bottom. It does not ordinarily attach to the surface film and never to the sides of a container. Simocephalus exspinosus is a rotund, rather bulky species, much heavier than the two species of Daphnia. It settles rather rapidly through the water, unless kept up by continued swimming movements. It lies upon and moves about over the bottom much of the time, fre- quently holds fast to the side of the container, and often attaches to and moves about at the surface film. It usually swims with ventral side uppermost. Its swimming movements are less jerky than in either species of Daphnia, due to its relatively smaller swimming antennae and more rapid antennal movements, though the jerky character is somewhat evident. In nature S. exspinosus spends most of its time upon the bottom and upon submerged aquatic vegetation. BEHAVIOR OF YOUNG OF DIFFERENT SPECIES WHEN RELEASED IN THE EXPERIMENTAL TANK. In the experimental tank the vast majority of individuals of D. pulex upon their release swam a few strokes without orientation, then oriented with reference to the light and swam toward the source of light. This orientation was not perfect in many cases, so that the animal sometimes swam somewhat diagonally. But even when the direction of movement was somewhat diagonal, the course was usually fairly straight. This diagonal course occasionally led to the side of the tank. In such cases the animal usually followed along A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 25 the side of the tank in the direction of its former orientation, though sometimes it took a diagonal course away from the side of the tank, but in the general direction (as regards light) in which it was formerly oriented. The individuals which were slow in reacting either moved very slowly, scarcely more than executing " place-maintaining move- ments," or they wandered about independently of the directive light stimulation for a time and later attained and maintained orien- tation with reference to the light. Some individuals wandered about so long or swam so little that they did not reach either end of the tank in the 15 minutes of the experiment. These were the "over- time" individuals which were arbitrarily assigned a reaction-time of 900 seconds. D. pulex seldom attached to the surface film or to the sides of the tank. Negatively reacting individuals were not especially common with D. pulex. The statements regarding the behavior of D. pulex in the experi- mental tank apply to D. longispina; this species sometimes became caught in the surface film and was unable to free itself. Such indi- viduals were discarded and excluded from the record. S. exspinosus, on being released within the experimental tank, settled to the bottom at once or swam a few strokes without orien- tation and then settled to the bottom. Occasionally some individuals just after their release swam upward and attached to the surface film. In many broods, some individuals, after settling to the bottom or rising to the surface, made no further movements during the 15 minutes of the test, while with some broods there was no further movement on the part of any individual. The majority of individuals, however, began moving again within a few seconds, or at most within 2 or 3 minutes, assumed their orientation, and swam toward the light. Most individuals, after orienting, paused for a time, settled to the bottom, and afterward continued their movement toward the light; others, after the second pause, did not move again. With S. exspinosus there was less random movement after the first pause than with the two species of Daphnia. Occasionally individuals, in their movement toward the light, swam near the surface, and when they paused attached to the surface film. Such individuals frequently did not move again. As with Daphnia, the orientation often was not perfect and some individuals reached the sides of the tank, fre- quently attaching there, and making no further movements; but more generally they followed along the side of the tank with the same general orientation as before. Orientation in a negative way was uncommon with this species. The frequency of occurrence of large numbers of Don-reactive individuals of S. exspinosus was a distinct difficulty to satisfactory experimental conditions. Because of this apparent difficulty. Borne of the earlier lines of S. exspinosus with which selection was attempted D. H. HILL LIBRARY North Carolina State College 26 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF were discarded as apparently unprofitable material for a selection experiment on the basis of reactiveness to light. The lines of S. ex- spinosus which were retained did not contain fewer non-reactive individuals during their early history, but the experiments were continued, and the results justify the conclusion that there was after all a sufficient basis for an experiment in selection. RELATION BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND REPRODUCTIVE AGE. Reproductive age is very closely related to environmental con- ditions, principally to temperature. It is a matter of common obser- vation in the rearing of this material that the reproductive age is greatly affected by temperature and food conditions. During a local period of high temperature and warm nights in summer, a generation may be obtained in 6 to 7 days in S. exspinosus and in 5 to 6 or 7 days in Daphnia and even in 1 or 2 days in Moina, while during a period of continued cool days and nights in fall or spring, when the laboratory is not provided with heat, the reproductive age stretches out to 11 to 14 days for Simocephalus and Daphnia and 8 to 12 days for Moina. Curves were made for some of the lines, showing the mean re- productive ages for different two-month periods. At times they show remarkably close agreement in mean reproductive ages, not only between the two strains of the same line but also between the different lines of the same species and to a considerable degree between D. pulex and S. exspinosus. Figure Ib (for Line 695) and Figure 17b (for Line 757) show two of these curves. STATISTICAL TREATMENT OF DATA. Irregularities in phototropic response are common. They are noted in almost every paper dealing with the light-reactions of ani- mals. Dependable results are generally obtained only by securing sufficient data to obtain averages from relatively large numbers. Like most other material, the Cladocera discussed in this paper showed considerable irregularities in light-reactions, and compari- sons of the two selected strains of the same line are made by con- sidering the data by longer periods, so as to avoid the extreme effect of local conditions and fluctuations in the behavior of individual broods. In the study of a character so complicated as a behavior charac- teristic it is essential to deal with relatively large numbers, and the safest way to deal with large series of data is by statistical treat- ment. Much time has been given to the statistical analysis of this data, although the treatment has been carried only so far as seemed A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 27 necessary in order to bring out the real significance of the material,1 and has been confined to the determination of standard deviations, probable errors, and a few correlations. Probable errors have been used in seeking to determine the significance of the reaction-time differences between the selected strains of the various lines. Many more probable errors have been determined (and included in the tables for the benefit of the reader) than have been referred to in the text discussions. On the other hand, probable errors have not been determined for many differences which were obviously too small to have statistical significance.2 For the benefit of anyone wishing to work over a portion of the data statistically, the sums of the individual reaction-times and the sums of the squares of the individual reaction-times are given in the tables which present the data for Lines 695 and 757 by broods. Hence, most of the statistical treatment for these two lines is capable of verification from the data presented in this paper. Likewise the data are available for any further statistical treatment. The standard deviations of the reaction-time means are large, whether the data is considered by shorter periods or by year periods. This is largely due to the over-time individuals, the data for which afforded considerable difficulty in statistical treatment. Other plans of handling the data for these individuals (other than assuming 900 seconds as their reaction-time) were considered, but they seemed to provide no better method of utilizing this very significant part of the data. 1 Such statistical treatment as has been accorded the data of this paper has been greatly facilitated by suggestions from Dr. J. Arthur Harris, of the Station for Experimental Evolution. However, any errors or insufficient treatment must be ascribed to the writer, who has conducted the statistical analysis. 2 It is recognized, however, that the value of the probable error is not fully utilized when one fails to determine probable errors for all the differences in a series of data — for, obviously, a difference which is twice its probable error deserves more consideration than one which is only a fraction of its probable error, though a difference less than 2Y2 times its probable error is considered of doubtful statistical validity. Nevertheless, to conserve the computer's time, it was felt advisable to omit the determination of probable errors for many of the differences which did not promise marked statistical value. 28 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF ANALYSIS OF DATA. Line 695. Presentation of Data. The data for Line 695 may be considered first. Line 695 is one of the original lines taken into the laboratory, the stock having been obtained from the spring-fed pond in the woods (Pond II), November 17, 1911. The selection was begun March 26, 1912. The stock had then descended 8 generations in the laboratory. By that time methods of rearing and handling the material had been worked out and the stock was well established. The manner of handling the young in making the selections has already been discussed. The selection data complete, summarized by broods, are given in the tables for the 695 plus and the 695 minus strains. Tables 3 and 4 contain in successive vertical columns, beginning at the left, the designation of the generation; the date of selection from within the brood; the hour of the day at which the experiment was conducted; the age of the young, whether a "new" brood or a brood released a day earlier (Sunday's broods and rarely others were tested when a day old); the number of individuals in the brood; the temperature of the water in the experimental tank at the time of the experiment; the number of individuals which went to the negative end of the tank; the number of individuals which failed to respond to the extent of reaching either end of the tank within the period allotted (15 minutes); the minimum reaction-time for an individual of each brood; the maximum reaction-time; the sum of the individual reaction-times for the brood; the mean reaction- time for the brood; and finally, the sum of the squares of the indi- vidual reaction-times (for computation purposes).1 Consultation of tables 3 and 4 shows that there are wide differ- ences in reactiveness of the various broods. These, in part at least, are due to the factors discussed on pages 17-20 and 128-149 of this paper. It is unfortunate, though not surprising, that these reaction differences are so large, but when all of the factors of the case are taken into account, it is believed that they are not unduly disturbing to the course of the experiment. Because of the relatively wide differences in reaction-time be- tween different broods and the small numbers in many of the broods, 1 For the benefit of anyone wishing to go over the author's analysis or make further analysis, it was desired to present the complete data for all the lines discussed in this paper. But (in view of the present great cost of printing so many pages of tables) data are presented practically com- plete for Lines 695 and 757 only. It is quite impracticable to publish the individual reaction- times for all the individuals tested in making the selections, even for Lines 695 and 757. The sums of the squares of these reaction-times are given. This renders available all the data necessary for a critical analysis of the original data and should satisfy the most exacting reader, so far as Lines 695 and 757 are concerned. The detailed data for all the lines have been typed in tabular m, such as is used for the data for Lines 695 and 757, and are stored in duplicate at the Station Experimental Evolution, where they may be freely consulted by anyone interested. Table 3.- A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. Summary of selection data by broods for Line 695 plus. 29 a +3 ID "3 i a o c a a 00 ■73 1 3 '$ O d 0) be a be 4) V CD a o 0 a o d u a a a o a o • »H •** CD > a CD ■a o o t-> u a 3 O >1 o .a ID a ID _« ID 3 C3 M 4> . ft.* 9 5 CD CO CD ■4 >, a > a be t o — 3 rt "" 3 of individuals faili: ch an end of tank. imum reaction-tim onds. S ■ c o CO ID M c c V. c £ c- J i a _o a CO o N •— CO o -a 13 _ o Cw CO c CD 1 1 a O '^ s S p H 3 0 i E O ? E C3 3 CT CO *•* O CO 0 0) si — o & so 16S 334250 T2 April 25 3 0 11 18.4 0 0 125 450 2725 248 7M175 U2 May 5 1 0 or 1 8 17.5 0 0 70 190 1010 126 141150 V2 May 12 1 0 or 1 4 14 0 0 100 230 635 169 112226 w2 May 20 2 0 7 14.5 0 0 135 450 1695 -■'< - 477225 X2 May 28 4 0 8 16 0 0 100 2 1 5 1380 173 L'.M400 Y2 June 5 1 0 2 18 0 0 110 125 235 US 27726 Z2 June 12 3 0 8 17.2 0 5 225 900 5265 658 4248226 A3 June 18 1 0 7 19.3 2 0 130 395 1410 S01 311350 B3 June 27 10 0 5 20.5 0 0 80 170 630 126 85750 C3 July 3 2 0 4 22.3 1 0 140 870 1750 i:;s 1134350 D3 July 10 3 2 2 22 0 0 190 400 590 296 196100 E3 July 19 2 0 2 22.3 0 0 520 575 ni".-, 648 601025 F3 July 26 11 0 1 21.7 0 0 370 370 370 370 1 ;-,!too F3° July 29 2 0 4 22.5 0 0 115 356 1010 253 13 1 G3 Aug. 1 2 0 6 22.8 0 1 165 1 3255 643 2167925 H3 Aug. 8 3 0 13 21.9 0 0 90 750 4155 1699178 I3 Aug. 14 1 0 4 0 0 100 222 664 1 ;; 88638 J3 Aug. 20 2 0 7 20.4 0 0 153 543 2215 318 B47 K3 Aug. 26 3 0 10 20 1 0 75 497 2037 204 566827 L3 Sept. 3 10 1 4 22.5 1 0 80 215 603 1S1 1002 » This is the original brood from which selections were made for the beginning of both the plus and minus strains. b Mean reaction-times in italics are those for which there is a corresponding mean for a brood tested on the same day in the minus strain. c Selection was repeated from the later brood because of the loss of the earlier brood. 30 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF Table 3. — Summary of selection data by broods for Line 695 plus — Continued. _a t M "3 a 0 -*> a a a OB 1 a 12 O ■*2 fl .2 O H J 0 1 cp E CO 0 1 O O co s 0 4$ CO E T3 O O 0 0. a CJ cC 1 a *-3 1 c '■& 03 .9 QJ c a 0 V co - >> 0 H 03 mm .2 p 33 a 1 0 a o '•♦3 cs B a 0 . CO O la J 0 a. X a 0 H 3 "5 c 2 ■si a m a 3 O >, a 0 3 si 6 0 . CM E « *4) 3 O > a S ° a a — a w 0 . 03 0 c3 3 M 11 ■a ° a - 0 03 M I- •a ° 2 u 0 0 09 9 eo ■si E § a 0 '■♦3 0 CO 0 u a CO CO 9 09 3 cr 10 O CO 9 E £ V cj J3 O 6 £D °3 O is 0 n> .~ 0) C3 CP 5 . 0 0 Q- a "Z £~ £^ z h 5 to <4 5 CO eg B 3 'i3 to 1913 M3 Sept. 9 2 0 9 20.6°C. 0 0 130 549 2475 275 892071 Na Sept. 17 10 0 8 18.4 0 2 130 900 2759 345 1783651 o, Sept. 27 10 0 13 16.8 0 0 106 352 2674 206 614380 p3 Oct. 3 11 0 5 17.9 1 0 156 455 1283 257 390103 Q.3 Oct. 9 10 0 13 20.1 1 0 110 576 2813 216 790577 Ra Oct. lfi 9 0 9 17.5 0 0 173 405 2402 267 695916 S3 Oct. 23 11 0 7 15.3 0 0 91 340 1184 169 242080 T3 Oct. 30 11 0 6 16.7 0 0 113 435 1208 201 314160 Di Nov. 13 11 0 5 15.1 0 0 91 318 778 156 158166 V3 Nov. 20 2 0 12 18.8 0 0 93 365 2276 190 505048 W3 Nov. 27 11 0 9 12.7 0 1 234 900 4075 453 2294323 Xa Dec. 5 11 0 5 13.8 0 0 358 691 2447 489 1281475 Y3 Dec. 13 10 0 4 12.5 0 2 308 900 2618 655 1974964 Z3 Dec. 22 11 1 8 12.3 0 1 320 900 4211 526 2450339 A4 Dec. 27 6 Se ectio is made but record incon plete. 1914 B< Jan. 5 7 1 6 11.9 0 0 150 560 1840 307 669850 C4 Jan. 15 2 0 8 13 1 1 340 900 4200 525 2422408 D« Jan. 22 1 0 7 13.8 0 1 158 900 3486 498 2103652 F,4 Jan. 30 1 0 12 15.8 3 2 135 900 6451 538 4267309 F« Feb. 5 2 0 7 14 1 0 183 617 2519 360 1025103 G4 Feb. 12 3 0 6 12.8 2 1 299 900 3347 558 2069435 114 Feb. 20 5 0 18 16.2 0 3 110 900 9963 554 6732879 U Mar. 2 4 1 5 16.3 0 0 85 238 825 165 149961 It Mar. 9 5 0 12 18.3 1 0 53 250 1889 157 336795 K, Mar. 21 3 0 8 17 0 6 219 900 5900 738 4986922 1a April 2 2 0 5 18.2 0 0 105 570 1345 269 495625 Ma April 9 2 0 9 18.5 0 2 120 900 3900 433 2334050 Ni April 16 3 0 10 19 0 2 85 900 3195 320 1906975 0« April 24 1 0 6 17 0 0 120 630 1455 243 539625 P4 May 1 2 0 12 19 4 2 183 900 6317 526 4182749 Q* May 7 6 0 15 20.8 11 1 95 900 5536 369 3003036 IU May 14 1 0 1 21.2 0 0 297 297 297 S97 88209 S4 May 20 4 0 9 21.2 3 1 135 900 3728 414 2125440 T4 May 27 4 0 8 19.9 0 7 645 900 6945 868 6086025 U4 June 3 2 0 5 18.6 1 0 220 850 2487 497 1484789 v< June 27 1 0 3 21 1 1 130 900 1335 445 919925 W4 July 3 1 0 4 19 0 0 160 345 985 246 259825 x« July 10 1 0 6 21 0 0 170 735 3230 538 1925400 Y4 July 16 2 0 10 23 0 0 120 520 3020 302 1111700 Z4 July 22 5 0 7 21.1 0 0 75 604 2091 299 864455 As July 28 11 0 5 21 4 1 165 900 1885 377 1101575 Bs Aug. 5 2 0 6 22 0 4 285 900 4355 726 3542125 C6 Aug. 11 2 0 2 24.8 0 1 180 900 1080 540 842400 D5 Aug. 20 1 0 5 23 1 0 201 525 1633 327 592355 Es Aug. 26 7 0 8 21 0 2 125 900 3907 488 2562427 F5 Sept. 1 2 0 12 22 2 2 180 900 5780 482 3464606 Gs Sept. 7 4 0 9 22 1 0 90 700 2737 S04 1213419 Hi Sept. 16 3 0 33 16.2 0 8 59 900 16589 503 11051527 It Sept. 23 3 0 8 18.9 1 0 70 425 1398 176 389734 Js Sept. 30 2 0 14 20.1 3 1 178 900 5921 423 3114431 Ks Oct. 8 3 0 6 21.8 2 1 348 900 4046 674 2912988 Ls Oct. 15 1 0 15 20.1 2 0 70 745 4523 302 1951685 Ms Oct. 21 11 0 13 18.8 2 0 58 480 3054 235 917626 Ns Oct. 28 4 0 15 17.5 4 2 125 900 6892 460 4112772 o6 Nov. 4 6 0 14 18.2 2 1 82 900 3927 281 1759315 Ps Nov. 11 4 0 14 19.2 0 0 100 570 3050 218 904678 Q5 Nov. 18 4 0 15 17.3 6 0 115 875 4791 319 2206373 Ks Nov. 26 2 0 14 18.5 9 0 100 840 5429 388 3134113 Ss Dec. 2 4 0 5 18.7 0 0 80 275 875 175 180975 Ts Dec. 8 3 0 8 16.7 1 0 56 263 1136 142 209724 Us Dec. 14 4 0 6 21 6 0 165 520 1943 324 740549 V. Dec. 21 3 0 10 15.7 0 0 103 235 1388 139 205034 Ws Dec. 29 1915 3 0 10 18.7 0 2 95 900 4178 418 25928S0 Xs Jan. 6 1 0 9 19 0 1 90 900 2345 261 1088025 Ys Jan. 15 1 0 6 18.9 0 1 125 900 2725 454 1764225 Z6 Jan. 23 1 0 12 18.9 1 3 176 900 6136 511 4070576 A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 31 Table 3. — Summary of selection data by broods for Line 695 plus — Continued. O As B8 C« Ds Es Fs Gs He h J« K, U Me N« 0« P6 Qs Re Se T» U« V6 Ws X6» Ys Zs A7 B7 Ct Dt Et Ft G7 H7 It Jt Kt Lt Mt Nt Ot Pt Q7 Rt St Tt Ut Vt Wt Xt Yt Zt As Bs C8 D8 E8 F8 G8 H8 Is Js Ks Ls Ms Ns Os P8 Qs Rs a '% B o a "■+3 o ID . in O ^ o *£ 3 « 03 Si 1915 Feb. 1 Feb. 10 Feb. 18 Feb. 26 Mar. 6 Mar. 13 Mar. 22 April 1 April 8 April 15 April 23 April 30 May 8 May 17 May 26 June 5 June 12 June 19 June 28 July 5 July 13 July 18 July 27 Aug. 16 Aug. 26 Sept. 6 Sept. 14 Sept. 20 Oct. 1 Oct. 9 Oct. 20 Oct. 28 Nov. 5 Nov. 15 Nov. 24 Dec. 2 Dec. 9 Dec. 16 Dec. 23 1916 Jan. 1 Jan. 13 Jan. 23 Jan. 29 Feb. 7 Feb. 16 Feb. 23 Mar. 2 Mar. 9 Mar. 18 Mar. 27 April 8 April 19 May 1 May 9 May 18 May 26 June 3 June 12 June 20 July 8 July 12 July 18 July 24 Aug. 1 Aug. 7 Aug. 14 Aug. 19 Aug. 26 Sept. 2 3 O n 03 03 •a c S El ■s S o .y > o 3 1 11 1 6 2 4 3 9 3 2 2 5 3 3 11 3 2 3 3 Random Random Random Random 5 Random 5 5 4 4 11 5 4 5 4 6 4 5 5 4 Random distribution. 8 9 15 12 10 18 13 8 10 15 14 10 9 10 5 10 13 12 4 4 distribution, distribution, distribution, distribution. 1 13 distribution. 0 2 0 5 0 6 0 9 0 8 0 12 0 14 0 18 1 18 0 28 0 17 0 12 0 9 0 15 8 8 5 6 5 3 4 5 7 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 5 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 13 15 20 9 14 9 12 3 13 17 6 13 8 10 5 7 Random distribution. 3 5 4 3 2 2 4 2 3 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 8 3 20 6 14 8 14 8 33 12 17.7°C. 13.3 16.5 19.2 19.3 17 17.6 20.8 5 .9 18. 17. 18 20.4 19.7 16.9 17 16.8 19.4 21.3 18 21 23.5 20.8 21.9 20.3 18.8 17 18. 15. 15 15. 15. 14. .1 .5 .9 1 .5 15.2 18.1 12.8 16 18.2 12 14.7 17 11.4 14.5 17.3 14.8 14.1 15 15.7 16.9 17.9 18.8 19.1 17.3 20 22.7 21.3 21.4 20.9 23.2 18.7 20.3 21 20.2 "J . CJ) 7. a "3 fl 05 B 3 0 4 1 2 3 0 0 0 Sel "•i G 03 a ■■3 ° a a S 9 192 77 140 58 118 70 140 72 417 60 83 125 320 160 205 108 82 140 245 505 90 180 120 160 100 110 70 50 70 60 60 50 90 60 100 100 75 110 60 90 100 90 145 S c 465 580 900 267 633 900 900 900 900 845 900 900 900 760 900 245 900 900 900 670 900 335 450 580 560 900 855 260 710 900 450 760 390 900 470 900 180 900 635 900 570 900 900 o 73 a _ o 3 CO 2343 1648 5746 1818 3393 3387 7787 2650 6668 3485 6573 4271 5634 3300 2160 1523 3752 5340 2545 2401 5785 515 1160 2070 2150 4080 2760 2030 4610 4005 5665 4140 2160 1935 3720 2875 820 4060 3605 6205 2095 2795 3560 ■3 a o £93 183 383 152 339 188 599 331 667 232 470 427 626 330 432 152 289 445 636 600 445 258 232 390 239 BIO 230 145 256 223 202 244 180 215 248 4H in 312 240 310 233 200 396 a a 3 8 § a* CO 737297 492636 2826876 334294 1397655 1262947 5350389 1381078 4G65470 1481175 4300045 2824692 3895706 1441050 1251150 248689 1877124 3195400 1930025 1457641 3766975 144625 336200 823300 713350 2914000 1322900 347900 1623150 1855475 1566775 1597800 508800 954725 1068550 1890875 103150 2127250 1236625 2922075 667125 1122575 2175200 ections made, but light current interrupted before experiment was completed 1) 0 60 80 5 0 95 690 0 4 90 900 1 0 80 430 (i 2 110 900 n 2 60 900 (i 2 90 900 1 0 135 260 0 0 145 420 3 4 270 900 0 0 180 290 ?, 7 150 900 0 1 100 900 0 9 250 900 0 7 300 900 ?, 1 90 900 0 4 100 900 0 7 140 900 4 2 160 900 210 70 14900 3990 307 1701000 6265 369 3947425 1120 187 288000 4560 3-51 2479600 2620 328 1763400 3535 354 2141.->7.r> 1065 213 236026 2185 312 735775 4810 601 3607700 720 240 179000 10600 530 7431800 ISL'O 303 1053000 9810 701 7912700 6600 825 5760000 3670 262 1816506 4110 614 3308900 13320 404 8776400 4920 410 2854800 .All of the 695+ stra77w^Io^c7pt a substrain of 695+ which had been kept in a dark c.oeet for 13 generations. Renewed from 695 Xe+ dark. 32 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF Table 4. — Summary of selection data by broods for Line 695 minus a ■ M "o3 t a o 43 a _e a ■a 1 a 'Ja •is a a 1 a 01 a 1 o m 0 s a 0 0 0 0 +3 0 a 2 ■6 o a '3 A *«-" (3 1 '-4J I 3 O +3 CQ a o h a * oi o fa a M 3 fa m S 1 J "o S *> >> •a a >, "3 >« **a v> a d o '■3 M .2 o CD . oo - | s a H O •■a 3 . O *J >. 13 0) .2 M a 3 O >> .2 a u 3 03 fa > al . bfl T. a $ "S3 . > 3 O > a ■■3 «" a a — CJ a o u 3 -a o CJ 9 U I- S -a 0 as 0) 1 a 0 0 03 03 3 H o3 3 C m **■■ 0 5 590 900 5090 848 4398100 L» May 20 3 0 1 17 0 0 230 230 230 230 52900 M May 25 4 0 5 19 0 0 185 645 1485 297 594875 N June 1 10 0 12 18.5 0 1 SO 900 2815 235 1243425 O June 10 11 0 or 1 5 17 0 3 620 900 4110 822 3492500 P June 18 1 0 4 19 0 0 180 330 935 234 231625 Q July 1 11 Oor 1 3 18 0 0 320 790 1495 498 874725 R July 8 10 Oor 1 2 22 0 1 290 900 1190 595 894100 R» July 9 11 0 2 22 0 0 230 345 595 288 171925 S July 17 9 0 2 22 0 1 450 900 1350 675 1012500 S" Aug. 1 3 0 4 21 1 2 600 900 3040 760 2389600 T Aug. 16 2 0 1 20.5 0 0 235 235 235 235 55225 U Sept. 9 2 Oor 1 1 20 0 0 285 285 285 285 81225 V Sept. 16 2 0 1 19 0 0 255 255 255 255 65025 v» Sept. 20 5 0 1 19.8 0 0 460 460 460 460 211600 w Oct. 2 1 0 6 14.1 2 0 95 665 1868 311 796624 X Oct. 15 2 0 1 19.2 0 0 280 280 280 280 78400 x« Oct. 18 3 0 8 18 1 0 70 615 2657 582 1150719 Y Nov. 1 1 0 1 18 0 0 174 174 174 174 30276 Z Nov. 16 1 0 2 15 0 0 235 445 680 340 253250 A. Nov. 25 2 Oor 1 4 17 0 0 310 595 1945 486 991725 B» Dec. 7 3 0 5 16 0 0 170 230 980 196 194350 C« Dec. 17 2 0 12 19 0 0 105 605 4372 364 1987924 Dj Dec. 26 1913 1 0 11 14 0 0 175 500 3058 278 790954 Ei Jan. 6 11 Oor 1 14 16.4 0 2 75 900 4967 SGI 2819819 Fj Jan. 13 1 Oor 1 4 14.4 0 0 90 190 555 139 84825 G, Jan. 21 2 0 8 14.4 0 0 125 280 1625 203 356475 Hi Jan. 28 3 0 8 13.4 0 0 95 365 1935 242 540675 It Feb. 6 2 0 9 13 0 0 100 355 2075 231 553475 Jj Feb. 17 1 Oor 1 9 13.4 0 0 140 510 2970 330 1066175 Ki Feb. 24 11 0 or 1 7 12.5 0 0 250 450 2470 353 908750 Li Mar. 3 11 0 or 1 8 11.8 1 0 110 340 1675 209 416125 Mi Mar. 20 1 0 1 17 0 0 315 315 315 315 99225 Nj April 7 4 Oor 1 4 14.8 0 0 100 200 610 153 98850 Ot April 16 3 0 11 17.5 0 0 110 505 2600 236 777078 Pt April 24 2 0 14 17.5 3 0 80 395 3145 225 814325 Qi May 2 3 Oor 1 6 15.8 0 0 95 250 975 163 173975 Ri May 12 1 0 or 1 7 14 0 0 210 460 2140 306 699950 S, May 20 2 0 5 14.5 0 0 330 660 2155 431 1002625 Ti May 29 3 0 6 16.5 0 0 70 135 640 107 71850 Ui June 5 1 0 6 18 0 0 130 250 1105 184 212525 V, June 12 4 0 9 17.2 0 1 95 900 2795 311 1364175 Wi June 18 2 0 5 19.3 0 0 130 610 1625 325 702425 X, June 24 2 0 6 20.5 1 1 207 900 3067 511 1971599 Y, July 1 2 0 1 21.7 0 0 138 138 138 138 19044 Zi July 10 3 0 2 22 0 0 290 800 1090 645 724100 Aj July 19 2 0 4 22.3 1 1 125 900 1635 409 1011675 B, July 25 5 0 5 21.8 0 1 165 900 1945 389 1101375 Cj Aug. 1 2 0 5 22.8 0 2 430 900 3280 656 2356950 D3 Aug. 8 4 0 10 21.9 0 0 150 345 2180 218 516350 E, Aug. 14 2 0 11 0 0 80 635 2630 239 889150 Fi Aug. 20 3 0 2 20.4 0 1 850 900 1750 875 1532500 Ga Aug. 28 4 Oor 1 11 21 0 0 100 320 2083 189 438627 H, Sept. 3 10 1 9 22.5 4 0 67 458 1466 163 360146 h Sept. 9 2 0 13 20.6 0 1 122 900 5102 393 2701034 Ji Sept. 17 10 0 8 18.4 0 0 146 460 1982 248 564172 K, Sept. 22 11 0 10 20 0 1 113 900 3011 301 1414841 I* Sept. 29 10 1 6 16.5 0 0 113 640 1595 266 629195 Mi Oct. 13 4 0 9 16.6 1 0 123 620 2565 285 961813 Na Oct. 20 11 0 6 17.8 0 0 110 244 1092 182 212072 0, Oct. 28 11 0 8 19.3 0 0 94 370 1284 161 261488 Pa Nov. 14 11 0 7 16 3 0 74 440 1411 202 363415 Qa Nov. 20 11 0 7 16.9 0 0 122 510 2069 296 726711 'Selection was repeated from a later brood because of the loss of the earlier brood. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 33 Table 4. — Summary of selection data by broods for , Line 695 minus — Continued. a 3 i H a "is *3 a o « a a 0 1 a o e o a T3 o a 1 s .a Q 03 a I i J S a '•3 o o CO .9 '2 s a ■3 A o & 0) u »5 a o a o i ■ o a o 03 N a 0) a O +3 o B •s & o O *3 o S? a I'3. O -w >> CI "si a u a a o >> "o 6 a o u 11 > o3 . o> ~ a § . > o ;a 0$ <— . 3 O > a =3 ° a a "" CO w o ■ CJ O a; a a) M 6 a •a ° a u •a ^ 4J o i u i- I8 03 cj a o •P aS 9 u •si B° B 9 i a o a s R a s 1 a a o- ■ °8 a J O Q~ m < a £ H- ^ Z B — n *2 » 3 i s a 3 00 1913 Rj Dec. 1 Random distribution. Sj Dec. 8 11 0 5 15.5°C 0 0 188 380 1468 294 454376 Ti Dec. 16 1 0 5 17.5 0 0 210 430 1615 323 553075 U, Dec. 26 1914 5 0 8 11.8 0 1 310 900 3756 470 2012560 Vj Jan. 4 10 1 8 12 0 2 280 900 4120 515 2628850 w, Jan. 12 1 0 8 11.8 0 0 223 665 3220 403 145- Xi Jan. 20 4 0 8 14.9 0 1 205 900 liS'.M 487 2379668 Yt Jan. 28 2 0 3 13.4 0 1 339 900 1609 536 1061821 Zs Feb. 3 3 0 11 15.2 1 2 230 900 6082 553 4014612 A< Feb. 11 2 0 8 14.7 0 2 210 900 4843 605 3113159 n4 Feb. 19 1 0 14 14.9 1 0 102 740 4167 298 1651857 c« Feb. 28 4 0 5 16.5 0 0 153 363 1405 281 426847 Dt Mar. 7 2 0 8 17.5 0 1 152 900 2963 370 16021^7 Ei Mar. 16 3 0 2 17.3 0 0 152 221 373 187 71945 Ft Mar. 24 3 0 8 16 2 2 128 900 3512 439 2160278 Gt Mar. 31 3 0 4 16.3 0 2 430 900 3020 755 2429000 Hi April 8 1 0 4 18.6 0 0 145 340 915 229 233125 It April 15 5 0 8 19.7 0 0 120 820 3340 418 1937200 Jt May 2 3 0 1 19.7 1 0 490 490 490 490 240100 Kt May 8 4 0 11 19 6 1 88 900 3603 328 1701519 Lt May 14 2 0 8 21.2 0 0 100 360 1656 207 410010 Mt May 22 2 0 9 18.7 4 1 97 900 4224 469 2663016 Nt May 29 11 1 7 22 1 4 490 900 5608 801 4634574 Ot June 6 2 0 2 17.9 0 0 535 610 1145 573 658325 P4 June 23 11 0 9 19.4 3 3 65 900 4325 481 29572-.';-) Rt June 29 1 1 3 19.3 2 1 555 900 2051 684 1473-11 July 8 July 14 2 0 7 19.6 1 1 305 900 3550 507 2022850 St 2 0 6 21.6 0 0 115 340 1306 228 34 1 Tt July 23 July 30 Aug. 8 Aug. 15 Aug. 22 Aug. 31 Sept. 7 Sept. 17 Sept. 23 Sept. 30 Oct. 7 Oct. 13 Oct. 20 Oct. 26 Nov. 2 Nov. 9 Nov. 16 Nov. 23 Nov. 30 Dec. 5 Dec. 11 Deo. 19 Dec. 26 2 0 1 21.2 1 0 141 141 141 141 19881 Ut 1 0 1 19.2 0 1 900 900 900 900 810000 Vt 3 0 9 22.1 0 2 190 900 5016 557 3356106 Wt Xt 2 5 0 0 22 2 22 22.9 6 0 5 1 100 630 900 900 10052 1530 457 765 K.1S080 1206900 Yt Zt 2 0 8 21.1 4 2 123 900 3123 390 •127 5 0 16 21.8 2 0 100 800 6383 399 3386309 At Bt C, D, Et Ft Gi Ht It Jt K, L, Ms N. O, Pi 11 3 2 5 0 0 0 o 6 11 8 6 16.3 19 20.1 20.1 0 8 2 3 0 1 0 0 85 100 80 60 395 900 400 370 1111 3372 1701 1020 185 307 213 170 266303 1670i U I 468945 217950 3 2 11 3 5 4 3 6 1 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 15 14 13 12 7 14 8 34 5 5 12 11 19 19.9 17.3 16.2 16.7 19 17.3 19 18.4 16 16 12.5 2 0 0 4 2 5 4 8 0 1 4 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 74 131 90 80 150 70 135 60 60 145 100 72 900 900 550 590 620 670 680 552 lss 900 900 280 6135 5108 3285 3020 2125 3123 2005 8346 613 2435 4350 2307 409 365 253 252 304 223 251 246 123 487 363 210 3623985 2750448 10(13923 1119750 8863 7. 1 1101069 7L'2733 2771 85569 1766693 2196550 522109 Qi Rt 1915 Jan. 4 Jan. 11 3 3 3 3 1 10 3 3 1 4 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 14 7 11 10 12 10 13 12 8 8 9 10 11 8 13 19.3 20.7 17.2 17.5 13.3 16.6 20.2 16.3 16 18.8 16.5 15 17.5 16 19.3 17.9 1 3 0 0 1 0 91 205 65 735 900 330 5364 6180 1140 268 441 163 1914546 3273950 150 St Tt Ut V, W6 X, Yt Zt Jan. 19 Feb. 1 Feb. 10 Feb. 18 Feb. 24 Mar. 5 Mar. 12 Mar. 20 3 0 2 1 0 0 0 o 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 o 100 85 110 105 55 70 92 90 630 445 900 338 ;;■..-, 900 900 516 3439 2340 3977 1942 2415 3052 L'OTS 1902 313 £34 331 194 186 254 260 245 1296451 678550 2184369 439790 1429104 1068210 7 1 79 1 2 At Mar. 30 1 0 o o 112 323 2092 232 529828 B, Ct Dt April 6 April 13 April 20 7 11 3 0 0 0 2 7 1 0 0 1 150 110 90 515 B56 900 3309 3373 21124 331 307 886 12.-.S685 1759685 17.', 11 76 E. F. April 28 May 6 2 1 0 0 0 0 75 261 151 SOS 34 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF Table 4. — Summary of selection data by broods for Lint 695 minus — Continued. ■ H O "3 ■ o 43 a a ^H CO 1 a 0 1*4 o c a 60 a bo a J 9 J CO a 1 O o •*3 O E o In -4-S £ -d o o "6 s c 03 s '3 -* 03 1 a 1 CI *-*3 m .5 9 u a Vj eg u w h 03 -*j o o O c a I s a 03 ^j to C C .3 J2 a 60 0 0) .5 H 03 . 60 to e $ "3 ^. 3 O .3 T3 > a a OS S hi '-+3 & a 3 fa d .2 o 03 J C tn fa SB 3 a 09 E a « o - £ M o C .5 3 O >, O 9 fa 0> . a a ■" 03 c H CO 2 "2 E B •- o E c "S o 9 ■si ^ o o 03 3 c a* CQ O 03 O a ^S o> 3 . 03 C o 2 " E " as E £ s efi -G O M S 6 flj w o ;s o oj •3 a 03 cv V o Q~ w < z H~ ^ Z " <5 § m 3 io CO s £* 1915 Ge May 13 4 0 11 17.8°C. 3 0 70 436 2083 189 563453 He May 22 1 0 8 17.3 0 1 90 900 2060 258 1114000 Ie May 31 3 0 6 15.3 0 0 246 642 2169 362 894821 Je June 8 3 0 10 18.8 0 0 220 792 4304 430 2259638 Ke June 15 2 0 11 20.6 7 0 171 395 3033 276 895395 Le June 21 3 0 6 19.7 0 2 290 900 3355 559 2293575 Me June 30 2 0 6 19.8 1 2 330 900 3984 664 2920518 Ne July 7 2 0 3 21.9 0 0 620 665 1937 646 1251729 0, Julv 14 Randi 3m distribution. Pe July 20 Randi im distribution. Oe» July 28 Randi >m distribution. Pe Aug. 7 Ranch )m distribution. Qe Aug. 13 Randc )m distribution. Re Aug. 19 Rand< >m distribution. Se Aug. 30 Rand< >m distribution. . Te Sept. 7 5 0 7 22.5 1 3 150 900 4670 667 3614500 Ue Sept. 13 4 0 7 20.9 0 0 150 630 2000 286 740650 V. Sept. 20 4 1 20 20.2 0 6 130 900 12635 682 9572475 We Sept. 29 5 0 11 18.2 1 2 125 900 5660 515 3778100 Xe Oct. 9 12 1 11 16.5 3 0 70 450 2070 188 514750 Ye Oct. 18 5 0 12 18.4 1 0 90 690 3445 287 1323225 Ze Oct. 26 5 0 18 16.5 3 0 70 720 4835 269 2095125 At Nov. 2 4 0 12 14.9 0 0 60 220 1400 117 192650 B7 Nov. 9 4 0 16 14.8 0 0 90 435 3200 200 751700 Ct Nov. 17 4 0 11 12.6 2 1 100 900 3220 293 1479650 Dt Nov. 24 4 0 17 14.6 0 0 65 240 2140 126 322050 E: Dec. 3 5 0 12 12.3 2 0 75 510 2120 177 526650 Ft Dec. 10 5 0 11 12.1 0 0 65 405 1575 143 323025 Gt Dec. 17 4 0 21 20.2 6 1 80 900 7580 361 3569200 Ht Dec. 25 1916 5 1 9 11.9 5 1 120 900 2820 313 1456550 It Jan. 4 5 0 10 14.5 0 10 900 900 9000 900 8100000 Jt Jan. 13 8 1 8 18 0 1 80 900 2280 285 1279400 Kt Jan. 23 3 1 9 19 1 0 105 600 2115 235 673725 Lt Jan. 31 9 1 11 13.1 1 4 130 900 5S70 534 4265500 Mt Feb. 7 4 1 17 15 0 1 50 900 3865 227 1580075 Nt Feb. 17 8 0 32 18 0 1 50 900 5230 163 1562800 Ot Feb. 25 2 0 12 13.3 0 0 80 330 2065 172 445075 Pt Mar. 4 4 0 9 12.1 0 0 90 310 1705 189 373125 Qv Mar. 13 3 1 11 18 6 0 90 750 3845 350 1912925 Rt Mar. 20 5 1 9 15 1 1 50 900 1865 207 1000125 St Mar. 27 4 1 10 15.2 2 0 170 840 5105 611 3218875 Tt Apr. 8 2 0 9 14 0 0 80 540 1840 204 624550 Ut Apr. 17 9 0 15 15.1 0 2 75 900 5145 343 2648775 Vt Apr. 29 4 0 5 15.2 0 2 180 900 2465 493 1771525 Wt May 9 4 1 13 16.7 3 0 70 500 3180 245 1041000 Xt May 17 3 0 10 16.8 0 2 70 900 2800 280 1783150 Yt June 5 5 0 5 19 0 0 145 720 2150 430 1141050 Zt June 13 5 0 6 17.8 1 0 100 600 1390 232 493050 As June 20 4 0 13 17.8 1 0 75 420 2020 155 412700 Be June 30 4 0 12 18.8 0 0 80 360 2010 168 403300 Cs Julv 7 6 0 7 19.5 0 3 180 900 3970 567 2889700 D, July 14 3 1 6 20.7 2 0 135 470 1655 276 521025 E8 July 21 3 0 1 5 21.1 0 4 270 900 3870 774 3312900 Fs Aug. 3 Rando m distribution. Gs' Aug. 14 5 1 26 19 0 0 110 460 4100 158 869400 H8 Aug. 19 12 0 7 19.8 0 0 120 360 1495 213 360025 Is Aug. 26 2 0 21 21 0 1 SO 900 8540 407 4770700 Js Sept. 1 2 0 11 19 2 0 160 760 4420 402 2220000 •Strain lost July 22 and renewed from substrain of 695 ■ closet for 37 generations. (695 Me — ) which had been kept in a dark A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 35 a better treatment of the data is secured by considering it by unit groups larger than a single brood. Convenient units of comparison are month and two-month periods, and summaries of the data by such periods will be referred to rather than the data by broods. Tables 5 and 6 give, in successive columns, the two-month periods; the generations of descent during the periods; the number of broods used in selection; the total number of young tested; the average number of individuals per brood; the average age of the mothers at the time their first broods were produced; the average number of young per day of the mother's age at the time of produc- tion of the first brood — the reproductive index; the total number of individuals moving to the negative end of the tank; the number of individuals failing to reach either end of the tank during the time of the test (15 minutes); the average minimum reaction-time for the different broods; the average maximum reaction-time; the sum of the individual reaction-times (for computation purposes) ; the mean Table 5.— -Selection data summarized by two-month periods for Line 695 plus. O. 05 2 93 & .5 o 1 o 1 d o • a o q Time period. a o a -0 "o oa a _o '-3 e3 u n ■a O 0 t. ■— . 03 4a 00 o> -^ so B 3 O >l «** o 6 55 a 3 O >> "o d 53 age age of mothers e first broods were p ed.b age No. of individu first brood divided rage age of mothers. bo a o 93 0) h > 93 . cd) m a § .2 a '3^ 3^ =3 ° a a "* 93 "3 J3 o a 0) M 2 3 2 '2 2 o M . 03 oj +3 o c8 Q 93 3 "3 3 -o 3 3 -' o 2 o a o '•& a '> o •a 03 T3 a ■ s ■M o If o H hi J2 i a cj O 6 55 •*> o £2 < > a«3 i* . 93 O CJ 55 " 4) C 0) S 2 3 W C 93 43 CO o c Apr.-May 1912... 9-12 4 28 9.5 11.8 0.81 3 3 189 679 11600 414 244 . 04 31.11 June-July 1912.. . 13-19 8 23 3.0 8.7 .34 1 6 479 722 13760 598 240.92 33.88 Aug.-Sept. 1912... 20-23 fi 17 2.0 13.7 .15 0 2 158 41S 5660 333 249.77 40.86 Oct.-Nov. 1912. . . 24-29 fi 14 2.3 11.2 .21 0 0 167 316 3268 233 101.40 18.28 Dec. 1912-Jan. 1913 Feb.-Mar. 1913. . . Apr.-May 1913... June-July 1913... 30-35 36-42 43-50 51-58 6 7 8 9 62 56 67 35 10.3 8.0 8.4 3.9 9.0 8.3 7.8 7.2 1.14 96 o o 77 428 13761 222 o 3 158 447 16930 302 1.08 .54 1 0 100 331 13345 199 3 5 209 462 12355 353 Aug.-Sept. 1913... Oct.-Nov. 1913. . . 59-67 68-75 9 8 7 6 9 7 74 66 50 56 75 40 7.2 8.4 7.0 9.3 8.2 6.1 6.7 7.5 7.9 8.3 7.1 6.3 1.07 1.12 .89 1.12 1.15 .97 2 3 114 548 20737 280 2 1 133 474 16019 243 4 7 253 822 25253 51 1;. Dec. 1913-Jan. 1914 76-83 4 10 158 634 24443 4.'!ti Feb.-Mar. 1914 .. . Apr.-May 1914... June-July 1914. . . 84-89 90-98 99-105 IS 6 15 2 198 149 766 693 327 IS 15033 436 370 224 . 64 23.96 Aug.-Sept. 1914... Oct.-Nov. 1914. . . 106-114 115-122 9 8 97 106 8.2 12.5 8.4 6.6 7.5 7.1 8.3 8.6 7.9 1.24 1.67 1.18 1.40 1.16 1.33 8 27 8 5 13 4 18 4 7 152 125 111 783 776 612 43400 35712 20726 447 337 31 1 Dec. 1914- Jan. 1915 123-130 8 66 4 114 664 •'til 22 307 Feb.-Mar. 1915. . . . Apr.-May 1915... June-July 1915. . . 131-138 139-145 146-153 7 8 5 85 81 43 11.6 10.0 10.5 11 5 ISO 216 S7ti 723 34741 15561 129 862 279 77 267.64 27 53 Aug.-Sept. 1915. . . Oct.-Nov. 1915. . . Dec.1915-.Jan. 1916 Feb.-Mar. 1916. . . Apr.-May 1916... June-July 1916... 154-160 161-166 167-174 175-181 182-187 188-195 4 7 7 6 6 6 26 107 80 70 67 49 6.6 17.7 12.4 10.3 11.7 9.0 9.2 8.4 8.5 7.9 10.4 7.2 .72 2.11 1.48 1.30 1.13 1.25 8 5 9 5 6 6 3 2 5 5 10 12 138 74 84 91 88 163 566 662 643 86 1 787 612 9530 25300 19710 L8570 22090 21200 367 236 246 265 330 433 246 11 32.60 206.09 15.54 288.31 27 78 Aug.-Sept. 1916... 196-200 6 89 9.7 6.6 1.47 6 30 173 900 42430 477 338.61 24 21 tested for use in selection. 36 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF individual reaction-time; the standard deviation of this mean; and its probable error. For the minus strain, table 6 gives three additional columns: the difference between the means for the plus and the minus strains; the probable error of this difference; and the quotient of this difference divided by the probable error. These tables are divided into sections, each containing the data for a period of a year, except the data obtained previous to August Tab le 6. — Selection data summarized by two-month periods for Line 695 minus. a* +* i. i 1 I i hi i HI o. 05 O M "rt-O a 43 o a o a o a o k> 03 43 a 73 a 43 00 V 43 a 3 O c •5 « o & e No. of individi rst brood divided ;e age of mothers. o a) c c "3 03 " 43 o O o B 8 43 a a a 9 B ■M o a 03 CO a . 0) 3 S '3 a a> hi tS o hi a. >> Time period. o CO a 73 00 a .2 "-5 no — O o to a 3 O >> "5 6 Z "3 43 o H >> MM O 6 Z ■a "38 be OS h, j>> "o3 > 43 03 . bo 03 8 "3 c 2 03 ■— 3 O 5 "a > a 73 3 c — oj s 3 s 3 1 o S 3 J 03 S B G 43 1 a 43 O 03 9 u "c3 3 > ■9 a a O 43 03 '> a 73 73 0 mm o u o 3 B 0 43 J) 00 fe 2 «•§ ■o B a 3 T3 MM O hi o H hi 6 01 •o a> V t3 *> c n ?. 03 hi 09 a 0 c 6 S? "3 CB flj QJ 3 o."2 it . 03 O 4) c3 m c3 aj M o S 3 GO a 6 0} •a a 03 43 03 03 JO O h, o c3 5a X> 03 XI o H Apr-May 1912... 9-13 6 31 5.2 11.8 0.44 2 12 264 746 17977 580 292.29 3fi .41 -166 47.13 3,52 June-July 1912. . . 14-19 7 30 4.7 8.3 .57 0 6 296 724 12470 416 302.16 37 .21 + 182 50.32 3.62 Aug.-Sept. 1912. . . Oct.-Nov. 1912. . . 19-22 23-27 5 6 8 22 1.0 2.8 1 3 2 0 367 194 427 462 4275 7604 534 346 254.67 174.94 60 25 .73 .16 -201 -113 73.20 31.09 2.74 3 63 14.1 .20 Dec. 1912-Jan. 1913 Feb.-Mar. 1913. .. Apr-May 1913... June-July 1913... Aug.-Sept. 1913... Oct.-Nov. 1913. . . Dec. 1913-Jan. 1914 Feb.-Mar. 1914 . . . Apr-May 1914... June-July 1914... 28-34 35-39 40-46 47-54 55-64 65-70 71-77 78-85 86-92 93-99 7 5 7 8 10 5 7 8 7 7 62 34 53 38 85 37 45 60 48 29 8.9 6.8 7.0 4.2 8.5 5.5 6.4 7.5 7.1 4.1 8.9 9.4 9.4 7.2 6.4 8.0 9.2 7.9 7.0 9.8 1.00 .72 .74 .58 1.33 .69 .70 .95 1.01 .42 0 1 3 2 4 4 0 4 12 7 2 0 0 4 5 0 5 9 6 6 119 183 142 160 217 105 161 195 219 374 439 394 372 675 646 437 725 728 673 670 17492 9510 12265 13400 25079 8421 19682 26365 19836 13478 282 380 231 353 295 228 437 439 413 465 - 60 + 22 - 32 ±000 - 15 + 15 + 68 - 3 + 23 - 89 170.94 21 .41 32.13 2.76 Aug.-Sept. 1914... Oct.-Nov. 1914. . . Dec. 1914-Jan. 1915 Feb.-Mar. 1915.. . Apr.-May 1915. . . 100-107 108-116 117-124 125-131 132-139 8 9 7 8 8 82 123 74 84 76 9.6 12.4 8.7 11.0 9.9 7.2 7.0 8.1 8.1 7.6 1.33 1.77 1.07 1.36 1.30 22 28 9 6 13 11 3 4 4 2 176 94 105 88 118 762 648 605 628 604 32288 34167 22389 21205 19978 394 278 303 252 263 + 53 + 59 + 11 + 55 + 166 197.23 15 .26 25.93 6.40 June-July 1915. . . 140-145 5 36 8.7 7.6 1.14 8 4 326 730 16613 461 233.14 26 .21 - 99 38.01 2.60 Aug.-Sept. 1915. . . 146-153 4 45 8.8 8.4 1.05 2 11 139 833 24965 555 292 . 86 29 .45 -188 43.93 4.27 Oct.-Nov. 1915. . . Dec. 1915-Jan. 1916 154-160 161-168 7 8 97 91 14.1 12.1 8.0 8.4 1.76 1.44 9 15 1 17 78 194 522 752 20310 33360 209 367 + 27 -121 295.95 20 .93 26.06 4.64 Feb.-Mar. 1916.. . Apr.-May 1916... June-July 1916. . . 169-175 176-181 182-188 7 5 7 100 52 54 11.3 11.0 6.5 7.6 11.6 8.6 1.49 .95 .76 9 3 4 3 6 7 83 95 141 704 748 624 23680 15430 17065 237 297 316 + 28 + 33 + 117 264.62 24 .29 36.90 3.17 Aug.-Sept. 1916... 189-195 4 65 8.8 7.3 1.21 2 1 118 620 18555 285 212.15 17 .75 + 192 30.02 6.39 • Including all the data available, some of which is additional to that for the broods tested. b All available data is here used, including that for No. 2 mothers whose broods were not ordinarily tested for use in selection. 1, 1912, and subsequent to July 31, 1916. The data obtained previ- ous to August 1, 1912, deserve less serious consideration than may be given the data obtained later, since previous to that time improved methods of handling the material and additional experimental pre- cautions were occasionally being devised and utilized. From August 1, 1912, the methods of handling the Cladocera material were pretty well standardized and there seems every reason to believe that the data are such as would be obtained by repetition of the experiments. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 37 The mean reaction-times obtained in the tabulation by two- month periods (tables 5 and 6) are used in the plotting of curves (figure 2c), showing graphically the courses of the selection experi- ment with Line 695. Table 7 gives in abbreviated form selection summaries of the data for 695 plus and 695 minus by the larger periods (mostly year- periods) into which it was divided in tables 5 and 6; it also includes summaries and results of the "test series" and summaries for selection data for three-month periods during which the test series were con- ducted. In table 7, in the vertical column to the left, are indicated Table 7. — Selection summary for Line 695. Time period. Apr. 1, 1912 July 31, 1912 Aug. 1, 1912 July 31, 1913 Aug. 1. 1913- July 31, 1914 Test series, Aug., 1913.. July 1, 1913 Sept.30, 1913 Test series, May, 1914 . . Apr. 1, 1914- June 30, 1914 Aug. 1, 1914 July 31, 1915 Test series May, 1915 . Apr. 1, 1915- June30, 1915 Test series, June, 1915 . May 1, 1915- July 31, 1915 Aug. 1, 1915 July 31, 1916 Aug. 1, 1916- Sept. 2, 1916 Strain. Plus . . . Minus , Plus . . . Minus . Plus . . . Minus . Plus . . . Minus Plus. .. Minus Plus. .. Minus Plus . . . Minus Plus . . . Minus Plus . . . Minus Plus . . . Minus Plus . . . Minus Plus . . . Minus Plus . . . Minus Plus . . Minus O 8-19 8-19 20-58 19-54 59-105 65-99 61 57 55-67 61-64 95 89 90-100 86-95 106-153 100-147 142 109 139-149 132-143 143 143 143-153 136-147 154-195 148-187 196-203 188-192 T3 oj> 0 "o o a> o o?£ 0 3 *» > c a c •a oj "s-g . aS O £• 9 /S 10 8 38 5/ 133 J0S 4 5 290 16 10 49 2S 67 57 16 6 29 /6 7 6 34 45 30 s a 302 2« 148 185 166 23J 181 /7/ 169 206 114 75S 194 269 146 10,8 I S3 168 163 12S //7 221 235 103 /24 156 //S a 3 s •a to 8 o '^. B A Q> M ■- o - /.S -37.3 + 0.5 +31.7 + 2" -6/.S - 1.0 + 60.0 - /./ + 81.3 + 51.1 + 61.5 -15.6 +150.8 •a .-. o 36. /7 //.59 13.10 12.14 S.SS 10.68 6.73 22.56 14.08 28! 63 //.77 30.2 Q^3 0.05 3.2 0.04 2.61 0 06 5.62 0.16 3l63 2.14 /.33 5.0 the periods covered by the various portions of the summary; succes- sive columns to the right of this indicate the strain (whether plus or minus); the generations of descent during the period under con- sideration; the number of broods used in selection and in obtaining the data; the average number of individuals per brood of those tested; the total number of individuals tested in making selections; the number of individuals moving to the negative end of the tank; the number failing to respond to the extent of reaching either end of the tank; the average minimum reaction-time; the average maximum reaction-time; the mean individual reaction-time; standard deviation 38 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF of this mean; its probable error; the difference between the mean for the plus strain and that for the minus strain; the statistical probable error of this difference ; and the quotient of this difference divided by its statistical probable error. For each period considered in this table the corresponding data for the plus and minus strains are given in successive horizontal columns, the plus first and the minus in italics immediately below it. Thus the items for making the signifi- cant comparisons between the plus and minus strains are found together. Table 8 gives a summary of the data for the "same-day" broods, i. e., those broods of the mothers of the corresponding plus and minus strains which reproduced on the same days and the young of which, consequently, were tested under identical conditions. The arrange- ment of the data is similar to that for table 7. Table 8. — Same-day broods. Summary of data for Line 695. Time period. Strain. — O o t~ Xl O 6 y. u a a bf a a o >, 0 U CJ XI S 3 a «j . §§ ED "es 3 12 ]> ■3 a "o 6 * a cm c '■D o 03 CD In J>> 03 . be m 0) — e * . > 1- 0 a a :s 03 Ci U-, 3 O > d c c — e3 **- - ="g . 03 O 0J fc u i a o o 03 Q u s 3 s c o M . Cfl QJ 9) £ 1 a o %-> a si 09 (-. s 3 a 03 s 3 -3 _c d -a u 03 ■o d 03 *a QQ d 03 CD E 'o Ih o CD J5 3 03 42 O H M O d . d m aj d 6 "3 S 3 *-> d -0 a a S O) 03 | § CD CJ d CD h CD S «** O U O S CD 3 03 Xi 0 H 1 03 -O O Bh O, >. •a 12 s c § 2 « OJ CJ Q^2 Apr. 6, 1912- July 31, 1912 Aug. 1, 1912- July 31, 1913 Aug. 1, 1913- July 31, 1914 Aug. 1, 1914- July 31, 1915 Aug. 1, 1915- July 31, 1916 Aug. 1, 1916- SeDt. 2, 1916 ( Plus I Minus . . ( Plus ( Minus. . . ( Plus .... 1 Minus. . . 1 Plus ( Minus.. . f Plus ( Minus. . . ( Plus ( Minus. . . 2 2 ii n 9 9 6 6 10 10 3 8 8.5 7.6 4.3 5.6 7.1 8.1 10.5 11.3 12.0 14-6 18.3 18.0 17 15 47 62 64 73 63 68 120 146 55 64 3 2 2 2 1 4 6 17 15 9 2 0 4 5 7 3 4 2 S 9 9 12 193 360 173 J SO 138 £30 125 96 92 57 110 103 900 900 455 601 527 sos 662 679 622 677 900 573 545.3 633.0 332 . 9 - 88 333.7 290.6 ..'",'..'' 314.2 311.9 284.0 277.1 383 . 6 261.8 — / — 12 + 2 223.11 250.74 324.97 206.33 13.74 14.00 29.56 «.S4 — 7 + 122 19.61 35.10 0.35 3.47 1 Figure 2c shows in diagrammatic form the mean reaction-times of the plus and minus strains of Line 695 by two-month periods. The distances from the axis of ordinates represent two-month periods of the selection data. The ordinates indicate the average reaction- times in seconds for the two-month periods. The solid line represents the course of the averages for the plus strain, the broken line for the minus strain. The roman numerals indicate the times at which the test series were conducted, and the plus and minus signs within the diagram indicate the positions of the means for these test series. Analysis of Data for Effect of Selection. On the whole, there is a marked coincidence of the fluctuations of the two strains, the means for the plus and minus strains in a general way following the same upward and downward trends. This A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 39 is obviously due to environmental factors. The data for the first 4 months previous to August 1, 1912, may be passed over with slight consideration, for (as stated above) the methods of handling the material were not sufficiently standardized at first. These first 2 two-month1 periods show rather widely different averages (see tables 6 and 7 and figure 2c), but from this time on less violent fluctuations in average reaction-times are encountered, except for very wide fluctuations in the average of the minus strain during the latter half of 1915, and an unusual upshoot in the plus strain during the last 4 months of the experiment.2 For the year, August 1, 1912- July 31, 1913, the mean reaction- time for the plus strain was 260.2 seconds (251 individual reaction- time records; see table 7) and for the minus strain 297.5 seconds (217 individual reaction-time records). The minus-strain mean was -37.3 seconds greater than that for the plus strain. The difference was 3.2 times the statistical probable error (table 7). This large difference is due, of course, to the difference obtaining for the first 6 months of this year-period. This six-month period is discussed later. In the latter half of the year there was not a consistency in reaction-time differences, though on the average the plus was slightly the more reactive. The "same-day" broods for the year-period have a mean reaction-time for the minus strain only 0.8 second greater than for the plus strain (table 8). For the year, August 1913-July 1914, the curves show that the two strains differ little in mean reaction-time (plus mean 371.8 seconds with 361 individual reaction- times; minus mean 371.3 seconds with 304 individual reaction-times; see table 7) and in relative vigor (see figure 2b). For the entire year the mean reaction-times differ by only +0,5 second and the same-day broods by only —12.3 seconds (table 8). Two test series were conducted during this period. One in August 1913 consisted of 529 individuals in the plus strain and 467 individuals in the minus strain. The mean reaction- times were 522.2 seconds and 490.5 seconds for the plus and minus strains respectively, a difference of +31.7 seconds ±12.14 seconds. This difference is 2.61 times the probable error. The second test series, May 1914, consisted of 1,083 and 1,088 individuals and the means were 501 and 562.8 seconds. The difference in seconds was -61.8 ±8.88, a difference 6.96 times the probable error. The results of these two test series are contradictory and judgment will be reserved until the later data are considered. xThe summaries of the data for the earlier portion of the experiments were made to include the first 4 months. Summaries thereafter were made covering year periods. Summaries for the lines later subjected to selection were made to conform to the summary periods already utilized for the older lines. 2 Actually this is only a trifle more than 3 months, as the selection was discontinued Septem- ber 2, 1916. 40 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF The year, August 1914-July 1915, gives as an average for the plus strain 368.7 seconds (478 individual records), 60 seconds greater than that for the minus strain (475 individual records), a difference 5.62 times the statistical probable error. For the first 10 months the plus strain consistently showed a higher reaction-time. For the 6 same-day broods the plus strain had a higher reaction-time by 2.3 seconds. A test series (May 1915, table 7) showed a higher reaction- time for the minus strain, but the difference was only —1.1 ±6.73. Another test series (June 1915) gave a higher reaction-time by 51.1 ±14.08 seconds for the plus strain. This difference was 3.63 times the probable error. During the remainder of the experiment with Line 695 (August 1915-September 1916), the minus strain fluctuated rather widely in mean reaction-time (figure 2c). For the year ending July 31, 1916 (399 and 439 individual reaction-time records), the minus strain had the higher reaction-time by 15.6 ±11.77 seconds. The same-day broods gave a difference of —6.9 ±19.61 seconds. The remaining short period of the experiment, a trifle more than a month, shows a considerably higher reaction-time (higher by 150.8 seconds) for the plus strain. If the experiment with Line 695 had been discontinued in January 1913, one might have felt inclined to ascribe a possible effect of selection to the strains of this line (see figure 2c). But it is extremely improbable that such an effect really should be thus ascribed for that period and that the selective effect once obtained was later lost in some manner. If one were to interpret this as an effect of selection acquired through a mutation or acquired in some other manner, it seems quite difficult to account for its loss. The selections were not relaxed and there was no period of high mortality among the stock to account for the loss of a selective difference. In two portions of the experiment the plus strain consistently had a higher reaction-time for 8 months or more at a time. Considering the curves as a whole, there are three periods in which one or the other strain had a higher reaction- time for as long as 6 months at a time. In two of these periods the plus strain had the higher re- action-time and in one of the minus had the higher reaction-time A further examination of these data will be made in order to seek the explanation. Relation Between Reproductive Vigor and Reactiveness to Light. It would seem plausible to suppose that relatively slight differ- ences in the general vigor of the two strains might be a factor in determining the reaction-time, particularly in such periods as those just referred to. The rate of descent of a strain may be considered one measure of its general vigor. Figure 2a presents the relative rates of descent of the two strains of Line 695; the base-line represents equality of A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 41 descent, i. e., if mothers of the same generation of descent in the two strains produce their young on the same day the circle will fall upon the base-line with the figure 0 adjoining. If young from the same generation of descent appeared 13 days later in the plus than in the minus strain, the solid circle will fall on the base-line with a figure 13 placed above the line, while if the minus strain (as in the case of the seventh entry in this diagram) were 4 generations and a day behind the plus strain in producing young of a given generation, this is indicated by the open circle being placed 4 units below the base-line, with a figure 1 adjoining. By comparing the relative amounts of descent of the two strains from the end of one two-month period to the end of the following two-month period, one can determine whether the plus or the minus strain had during that interval descended the more rapidly, i. e., which strain was presumably the more vigorous of the two during that limited period. For example, from the end of May 1912 (first entry in this diagram) to the end of July 1912 (second two-month period and second entry in the diagram), the minus strain from having been 1 generation and 2 days in advance of the plus strain had become 13 days ahead of the plus strain in its time of producing young of the same generation of descent. During the following two- month period (the third) the minus strain became just. 1 generation (third entry in the diagram) behind the plus strain. Still one period later (the fourth) it was 1 generation and 7 days in arrears of the plus strain. Comparing rate of descent with mean reaction-time, the minus strain during the second two-month period descended the less rapidly, but was the more reactive of the two strains. During the third period the minus strain descended the less of the two strains and was the less reactive. During the fourth period the minus strain again descended the less rapidly and was the less reactive. While the difference in reaction-time is frequently in the direction expected if influenced or determined by the relative rates of descent of the two strains, such is not true more often than the reverse is true. For the 27 two-month periods of selection with Line 695, the more rapidly descending of the two strains had the lower reaction-time in 10 cases, the higher reaction-time in 13 cases; for 3 two-month periods their rates of descent were identical; and for 1 period their mean reaction-times were identical. That is, the more vigorous strain, judged by its rate of descent, was the less reactive during 13 of the two-month periods, and in fewer cases (10) the more vigorous strain was the more reactive one. Hence, judged by this measure alone, the more vigorous strain was the more reactive strain less often than it was the less reactive strain. In a further endeavor to learn if relative vigor is a factor in influencing reaction-times, all of our data for Line 695 which seemed 42 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF to bear on the general vigor of the stock were tabulated. In con- sidering this point three criteria of the general vigor of the material were used, the age of the mother at the time her first brood was produced, the number of young in her first brood, and the interval between the first and second broods. From a general knowledge of the material and use in other connections of these measures of the vigor of the material, the writer can state that these are satisfactory criteria. Figure 1a shows graphically the average number of young in the first brood for Line 695 by the two-month periods of the experiment. Figure 1b shows the average age of mother for the same periods. 1 8r I 5 1912 4-5 8-9 12-1 1913 4-5 8-9 12-1 1914 4-5 8-9 1915 4-5 8-9 1916 10 :i 00 I tl I I 12-1 t 4-5 8-9 I I * I I I 10 I 5 I I B s 4-5 8-9 12-1 4-5 8"9 12-1 4-5 8-9 12-1 4"5 8-9 # 12-1 4-5 8-9 ._ 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916 t 1 I I I ll I I * 3 I ' » J ? I *_,! -12.00 .50 1.00 .50 1 00 Figure 1. — Line 695. Reproductive vigor. A. Average number in the first brood by two-month periods. The vertical scaling above the base-line indicates the number of young; the horizontal scaling, the two-month periods of the experiment. Solid circles, show positions for the plus strain; open circles for the minus strain. B. Average age of mothers at time first brood was produced. Vertical scaling below the base-line indicates the number of days. C. Actual values of reproductive indices (average number of young in first brood divided by average age of mother at time first brood was produced). Vertical scaling indicates the numerical values of the reproductive index. Each numerical value of the reproductive index (in C) is obtained by dividing the corresponding numerical value in A by the corresponding numerical value in B. I- 2 2 0 2- 4- 6- 8- 13 A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. A 43 o o o 0 7 I O 10 o o O 3 2 O I O O |0 4 4 oo oooo oooooo 22O4985n902 0l0l0 o o O — I 0 4"5.«.o8"9 l2"' 4"5 8"9 ,2"' 4_5 8"9 l2"' 4-5 8-9 12-1 4-5 8-9 1912 1913 1914 |9|5 T » .tT T • B T JJLJL 1916 AATV . T T 600 r 450 300 150 .50 .25 00 .25 .50 4-5 8-9 1912 12-1 4-5 8-9 1913 12-1 4-5 8-9 1914 12-1 in rv 4-5 8-9 1915 12- 4-5 8-9 1916 Figure 2. — Line 695. A. Relative rates of descent of the two strains. The base-line represents an equality of descent, i. e., if both strains produced young of the same generation of descent on the same day the circle would fall on the base-line with a figure "0" placed adjacent. Positions above the base-line (solid circles) indicate that the minus strain in a particular generation was lagizing by as many generations as the point falls in units below the base-line and by as many additional days as are indicated by the adjacent numeral. The horizontal scaling indicates the two-month periods of the experiment. B. Reproductive indices plotted to show which strain is superior in vigor (and by how much it is superior) in the different two-month periods in experiment. Solid circles indicate that the plus strain is superior by the amount indicated by the distance the solid circle lies above the base- line; conversely, open circles below the base-line indicate the amount of superiority of the minus strain. The horizontal scale indicates, as always, the two-month periods of the experiment. C. Reaction-time curves. The plus strain in solid, the minus strain in broken line. The vertical scale indicates seconds of reaction-time, the horizontal scale two-month periods of the experiment. The points in the curves represent mean individual reaction-times by two-month periods. The roman numerals indicate times at which "test series" were conducted, and the plus and minus signs the positions for the test series means for the two strains. It seemed desirable to combine these measures so as to write the result in a single quantitative term. This was in part accomplished by dividing the mean number of young in the first brood by the mean age of the mothers at the time the first broods were produced. This gives the average number of young per day of the mother's age and may be called the reproductive index.1 This reproductive index is Unfortunately this did not include data for the interval between the first and second broods. This, however, was the least important of the three available measures of vigor, and the data for it was less extensive than for the other two measures. 44 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF given in the seventh vertical column of the tables of data summarized by two-month periods (tables 5 and 6). The reproductive indices for the two strains are plotted in figure lc, in which the actual values are represented by the amount of elevation above the base-line of the solid and open circles. The solid circles represent the reproductive indices for the plus strain, the open circles for the minus strain. The distance between the solid circle and the open circle for any period represents the difference in reproductive index, the solid circle or the open circle being elevated the more above the base-line as the plus or the minus strain has the larger reproductive index. In figure 2b the differences between the reproductive indices for the plus and minus strains are shown, a plus advantage being shown and its amount indicated by the eleva- tion of the solid circle above the base-line and a minus superiority by the amount of the depression of the open circle below the base-line. Throughout the first of the three periods of the curve for Line 695, during which there was a consistent difference between the* mean reaction-times of the two strains for as great a period as 6 months (August 1912-January 1913), the plus strain had the lower reaction-time and was slightly, though only very slightly, the more vigorous. But during the succeeding four months (February-May 1913; see figures 2b and 2c) the plus strain had a considerably greater advantage over the minus strain in vigor and yet the mean reaction-times of the two strains were very near together. The fairly wide and rather consistent difference between the mean re- action-times of the plus and minus strains for 6 months during 1912- 13 is not accounted for on this basis. For the ten-month period (August-September 1914 to April- May 1915) during which time the plus strain continuously had a higher reaction-time than the minus strain, the plus strain was slightly the less vigorous of the two during 6 of the 10 months; but during the other 4 months the reverse was true, and for the 10 months as a whole the reproductive vigor of the two strains was practically the same. For the seven-month period at the close of the experi- ment, during which the plus strain had a considerably higher re- action-time (was less reactive) than the minus strain, the plus strain, judged by the measures applied to it, was actually considerably the more vigorous of the two strains. Hence, of the three periods of the curve during which the two strains differed consistently in reaction-time for as much as 6 months at a time, only one of these differences, that for the second period, and only a portion of it, could be accounted for on the basis of the more vigorous strain having been the more reactive. Comparing by two-month periods for the entire duration of the experiment, one finds that the strain of Line 695 which (on the basis of its reproductive index) was the more vigorous had the lower re- A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 45 action-time during 14 of these periods, while in 12 two-month periods the more vigorous strain had the higher jeaction-time. For one period the average reaction-times were equal. Compared by periods of a single month, the strain having the greater vigor had a lower reaction-time in 23 cases and a higher reaction-time in 26 cases. For one month the vigor of the two strains measured the same, for one month the reaction-time was the same, and for three months the data were incomplete and a comparison could not be made. Hence in the selection experiment with Line 695 no relation is discovered between fluctuations in general vigor and mean re- action-time, either when the data are examined month by month or by longer periods during which there was a constant difference in reaction-time. Whether the measure of vigor is taken as the rate of descent or as the reproductive index, any reaction-time differ- ences which one might have expected to find explicable on the basis of differences in vigor between the two strains quite fail to appear so. The test series may again be referred to. Three of the four of these gave differences in mean reaction-time which are statistically significant;1 for one the difference was practically nil. Of the three differences of statistical significance, two were differences in which, in opposition to selection, the plus strain had the higher reaction- time and only one of the differences was in the direction of selection. Hence their net effect is to indicate a lack of effect of selection. Examined as a whole and on the points considered in detail, it is obvious that with Line 695 there was no effect of selection. This is by no means surprising, for if an effect of selection is obtainable with a given material it is not to be expected that such effect will necessarily be secured every time it is attempted. Selection can- not be effective unless germinal variation occurs which affects the character used as a basis for selection; and there seems no logical reason for supposing that germinal variation occurs in all, or to the same extent, or at the same time, in all material which is otherwise apparently entirely similar. It would be superfluous to make such an extended analysis of the data for each of the lines as has been attempted for Line 695. Tables of data and diagrams similar to those for Line 695 are given for all the lines (though some of these lines have their data presented somewhat less fully), but it has not seemed necessary to make the treatment nearly so complete. The tabulated summaries and the curves plotting reaction-times and the reproductive indices render the interpretation rather obvious after the full treatment accorded Line 695. Of the other lines, the data for Line 757 alone are examined rather extensively because of the interesting result within that line. iThe times at which these test series were conducted are indicated by the roman numerals on figure 2c. 46 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF Line 689. Line 689 was obtained from the surface-water pond in an open field (Pond I) and reared in the laboratory for 8 generations before being subjected to selection. Selection was continued 16 months, 44 generations in the plus strain and 42 generations in the minus strain, when the experiment was terminated by the accidental loss of the plus strain. The data are presented after the plan followed with the data for Line 695 in tables 9, 10, 11, and 12, and in figure 3, a, b, and c. For the first 4 months of selection the mean reaction-time for the plus strain was 498.4 seconds and for the minus strains 464.2 seconds. The difference was +34.2 ±41.4 seconds (table 11). For the year (nearly), from August 1, 1912, to the close of the ex- Table 9- -Selection data summarized by two-mo nth periods for Line 689 plus. u oj p, *° JL 03 O rt .2 >> rt -Q a o -rt 1 £3 O 1 a o i a o a T3 m O- 3 M UjJ a cj o 09 49 00 9 ■rt M a 3 O >> o & indivic divided lothers. □ '-rt o 03 0J h s a -£ «8 a ■* o 03 s u a to 95 a o 0] cj £ o c c a OJ a 3 M-t •6 u- B >, 3 3 03 »*-. Time period. ■M O 03 -a O 0 6 rt 0J X o o 6 £ '49 3 O a '£ a 'm 03 a o 49 3 "2 J3 03 u O rt c _o 49 OS u o H Z oj . Sp-a Average ag time first duced. Average N of first b average ag 03 . s § . > 1* - Cj c s w o . rt O > *o 6 8 3 O >. *o d z OJ . CJ OJ I * a 03 og U O J2 M rt -^ .3 CJ 03 OJ u >f "3 > eS . M 03 C 3 r3 +^ £ OJ "rt >~ 3 O > 3 -rt ^ e s a 03 OJ u £ 3 £ 'a £ CJ 03 OJ U £ 3 £ 03 £ CJ m J '•♦3 i c _o V» rt QJ M CJ 03 CJ h "rt 3 > ■3 3 £ o a _o '> CJ -a a 03 CJ H o h o rt rt OJ CJ 3 . rt 2 CJ 3 £ 'rt a -S CJ °3 CJ in ^ 2 -rt 3 Oj .3 ■o £ s"2 a a 0> rt OJ fca ■3 <*4 o rt o rt rt CJ CJ 0. >. X OJ 03 M^- M T3 m« c? ,M rt ° O to M 03 XI oj d X JJ rt rt o =s g "o "2 3 CJ 73 «73 !s »< ° S; oj > . 03 O CJ z * oj E oj £ £ 3 73 a 3 OJ •- 3 03 49 w X o rt X o rt Q^5 Apr.-May 1912.. . . June-July 1912. . . . Aug.-Sept. 1912... 10-13 14-17 4 5 9 20 2.3 7.3 13.3 9.0 .17 .81 1 0 2 3 246 439 586 728 4048 9415 450 471 + 53 + 22 18-19 2 8 4.0 21.5 .19 0 0 138 268 1624 203 106.46 25.39 + 131 56.70 2.31 Oct.-Nov. 1912. . . 20-23 6 14 1.3 14.6 .09 0 0 155 306 3375 241 148.60 26.79 + 90 44.57 2.01 Dec. 1912-Jan. 1913 Feb.-Mar. 1913. . . Apr.-May 1913... . 24-30 31-36 37-44 7 6 s 51 31 84 7.3 5.2 9 1 8.8 9.2 8.0 .83 .57 1.14 2 0 1 2 0 0 114 173 113 383 321 492 13135 8175 21850 258 264 260 + 59 + 38 - 36 June- July 1913.. . . 45-50 6 35 5.8 7.5 .77 2 0 138 468 8722 249 130.89 14.92 + 79 27.43 2.88 A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 47 Table 11. — Selection summary for Line 689. ap a o -*> 1 fl 1 fl i a b i a ■ e o S3 "5 fa o E JO 3 03 o A Time period. Strain. a a> 5 00 OJ ■V "o 00 a _o j3 03 fa S 13 a> a ■6 oj *j m 0J ^ OQ ~3 O O u f 6 z -3^ ■>-s .S * 0 o J5 -a o 0) o sis oj ■" 00 oo a "3.2 T3 ° ■ ~ a -3 <° . 03 — a 03 •"* 1' M _a %-» o OS q5 fa j>> "3 > ■49 03 . &1) X 11 "3 . > 1=3 □ a ■2 - "3 ■« 3 O 3T3 > fl "- 4) T3 a a — < c3 "S-g . 03 O « Z u .2 p cj 3 h a 3 a a o E| o Q rf O h a 3 a '3 03 a ex . £ S 0J c o Q 03 0J u *3 3 s a a ci 03 a CJ ■-» a* 03 cj a o a _o 03 | a -a 73 fa eq ■a a 03 m a 03 a "o fa o t; ■ o 3 o3 -O O fa &< a 03 3 a a 1 o it CJ o 5 a J3 O fa a >. X. s 73 1 ■3 • fa S£ |« • — to * 3-° Apr-July 31, (Plus 9-19 10 5.4 54 4 12 271 611 498.4 260.7 23.9 + 34.2 41.4 0.83 1912 [ Minus . . 9-17 .9 3.2 2.9 1 6 S/)fl fifi/) 4ff4« 269.4 33.7 Aug. 1, 1912- J Plus.... 20-52 36 7.2 259 7 12 174 514 295.1 194.8 8.2 + 40.0 10.5 3.71 July 16, 1913 1 Minus . . 18-50 36 5.4 223 5 2 136 392 255.1 146.2 6.6 Table 12. — Same-day broods. Summary of data for Line 689. Time period. Strain. 00 ■3 o o fa J3 O 6 Z a 3 O >, *** o i-i 3 t" > a GO "3 3 T3 ■g ■3 a "o d S3 5 4 89 72 t ■$ c 03 O M ^>« .2 3 32 a ^ a °. M o a 15 >a No. of individuals fail- ing to reach an end of the tank. 1 o b a 3 J a a as m a 03 O t a 3 a is co a 03 O 8l i o ^03 "i c o U Oil Is 5a Apr. 9, 1912-July 31, 1912 f Plus . . [ Minus { Plus . . [ Minus 1 1 10 10 5.0 4.0 8.9 7.2 0 0 4 3 0 2 2 315 440 125 131 900 690 464 467 712 649 295 292 + 103 + 3 Aug. 1, 1912-July 31, 1913 periment with this line in July 1913, the mean for the plus strain was 295.1 seconds and for the minus 255.1 seconds. The difference was +40.0 ±10.5 seconds, 3.71 times its probable error. There was only one same-day brood1 for the four-month period, but there were ten same-day broods during the later year-period. For these same-day broods likewise the reaction-time for the minus strain was lower than for the plus strain, but the difference was only 3 seconds (table 12). It is an interesting fact that in this line, in opposition to selec- tion, the minus strain persistently (except for 1 two-month period, see table 10) maintained a lower reaction-time than the plus strain. This difference, while not large for the greater part, is so general that it can scarcely seem to be merely coincidental. The same-day broods (table 12) show the minus broods with a smaller reaction- time, but for the only significant group of these the difference is so slight (3 seconds) as scarcely to be suggestive. i For this pair of very small broods the mean of the plus strain was 163 seconds greater than that for the minus strain. 48 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF 50- 00 - I A 6 4-5 si 8-9 12-1 4"5 There were more over-time individuals in the plus strain, 24 as compared with 7 in the minus strain. The average minimum and maximum reaction-times likewise indicate greater reactiveness in the' minus strain for the last 12 of the total 16 months of the experi- ment. The average minimum reaction-time for all the broods tested in the plus strain for this last year was 174 seconds (table 11), while the corresponding average for the minus strain was 136 seconds, indicating that the most reactive individuals in the minus strain had a lower reaction-time by 38 seconds than the corresponding individuals in the plus strain. A corresponding comparison for the maximum re- action-times for the two strains gives 514 seconds as the average maximum for the plus and 392 seconds as the average for the minus strain, the difference (122 seconds) indicating that the individuals with the highest reaction-times in the plus strain were 31 per cent slower in reacting than the corre- sponding individuals in the minus strains. These portions of data tend to confirm a greater re- activeness for the minus strain than for the plus strain. Comparison of the curves for the two strains of Line 689 may be made with the combined mean reaction-time curves for all the plus and for all the minus strains of those Daphnia pulex lines be- tween the two strains of which 1912 Pt b 1 I T T 1913 > t L \ A ° A 50 25 00 4-50 - 300 - 1501- 00 c \\ * \\\ \ vrv l\ V f — \v-«-^ ^ *"*■**'/ V ^C# — - - 4-5 8-9 12-1 4-5 1912 1913 A. B. C. Figure 3. — Line 689. Reproductive indices, actual values. Reproductive indices, superiority. Reaction-time curves with superim- there were no consistent differences ITZtZTL^ ^T lines) ™»T™nti?* th° combined reaction-time means for the plus and in reactiveneSS Lines 691, 695, minus strains of all Daphniapulexlines in which 71^ 714- anrl 7^1 fcop fio-nro ^r^ significant reaction-time differences did not /1«5, /!*, ana /01 ^See ngUre 6C). arise— Lines 691, 695, 713, 714, and 751. Inspection of these curves shows that for 3 two-month periods (August 1912-January 1913) the plus strain of Line 689 was abnormally high, while the minus strain of Line 689 was abnormally low in reaction-time, and that aside from these 3 two-month periods the two strains of Line 689 did not differ so greatly in their reactiveness. It would seem possible that the pronounced divergence in reactiveness between the two strains of this line for the period indicated may have been due to the coincidence of unusual reactiveness of the minus strain and slight reactiveness of the plus strain brought about by differential A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 49 environmental factors (see page 140). However, in 4 of the 5 other two-month periods of the experiment, the minus strain was the more reactive (the combined mean was 42 seconds greater for the plus strain), and it is possible that there really existed a genetic differ- ence between the two strains of this line. Perhaps the most that can be said regarding Line 689 is that the persistently lower reaction-time in the minus strain is suggestive of a genetic difference in the reverse of selection. It is much to be regretted that this line could not have been continued longer or that large test series were not conducted in order to secure better evidence concerning the real persistence of this apparent difference in reaction- time. With regard to any relation between mean reproductive vigor and mean reaction-time in Line 689, it may be said that no relation is discoverable. On the whole, the plus strain was somewhat the more vigorous (see figure 3, a and b) while the minus strain was the more reactive. Further, there is an entire lack of coincidence of lowered reaction-time means with higher reproductive indices. The influence of general environmental factors is seen in the somewhat coincident up-and-down movements of the curves for the two strains. Line 691. The data for Line 691 are presented in tables 13 and 14 and in figure 4. This is one of the original lines of D. pulex. Selection was begun in the seventh generation and continued for 87 and 89 genera- tions in the two strains. The experiment was terminated by the loss of the plus strain after 27 months of selection. For the first 4 months of the experiment the mean reaction- times for the plus and minus strains (only 40 and 35 individuals respectively) were 480.9 and 434.9 seconds (table 13). The plus Table 13.— Selection summary for Line 691. 1 3 03 . St3 i ■D 0J i a o 1 o 1 .2 i .2 a 03 1 a □ 6 0 a OJ 03 P a > to T. Z "3.2 3 S a a a a oj CI 03 9 M 9 S3 9 5 03 0) E s 0 a 03 ■ cS s E i >> J3 Time period. Strain. o 00 3 T3 O "6 X m -♦» ■r. o o .2 01 oj j>> "oS > C3 »~ 3 O 2-o > a s 3 = '5 S 3 '3 03 "3 3 -a c 0 03 > E O ■* O t 0J 0 3 0> • it w 0> X j3 OJ O lj O "8 J 3 a o o o u Z-T3 o oj o O ^ . OS ° E y, 03 . a « a c S oj g o T3 -3 E 03 •1 OJ 2 is u a e o a 0 \1 a ■3 2 . > . e) 03 flj ~ S 03 - 01 C C 0) ■a ja 0 u- O 03 0 E : •a J o y, n 7 38 40 39 ss 1* 1 / 8 20 25 SS y. B $* s1 S- 5 a 6 aJ Apr. 12, 1912- July 31, 1912 Aug. 1. 1912- July 31, 1913 Aug. 1, 1913- June 12, 1914 ( Plus ( Minus . . ( Plus 1 Minus . . ( Plus I Minus . . 10-19 11-18 20-55 19-57 56-93 68-95 3.7 5.0 5.9 6.4 7.3 7.0 40 35 225 S57 285 S73 10 9 6 19 37 38 347 142 740 171 SS8 743 577 373 459 r.sn 7SJ 480.9 434 . 9 LMS.S .'.'".'.'■ 391.0 4KS.2 sm 0 300.6 164.6 MO.0 265.8 £68. e 31.9 7.4 9.S 10.6 (0 :' + 46.0 46.8 0.98 • i/.3 4.0< -S5.t 15. t /.tfff 50 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF Table 14. — Same-day broods. Summary of data for Line 691. e o i a 1 t c a u o o i B a ..* o O o 03 a V G 0) ta XI M a 3 o CO c o B tx • o 03 +3 C3 CO Ctf u '& o 03 V £ o a 03 6 03 c . B m c O £ '3 O u a >> X) >> m j= £ s p— a o £ a 1 IM •a Time period. Strain. DD 0 ■ 3 *T3 > 03 "•* Is 3 _E g °3 3 3 j3 _e3 0 M O « oo •s.s 0 t, o -a 0 c u X d 4> . > "9 c «3 B fi £ .£ e e fi "" 03 1 03 E -3 a -a 3 9 •a E g-g fi a o •a n M-o u M . B A - E O 6 2 o 6 S3 1* C * w o . 03 ° s 2: * 03 cj o E B £ > •- U ■a a •*> DQ c3 X> O u Ph 5a a] O u PL, l- « ta.2 5^ Apr. 8, 1912- ( Plus 1 Minus . . ? 3 R 7 n 3 28.5 900 634 +331 July 31, 1912 9, 4 0 5 o 1 ?25 555 303 Aug. 1, 1912- j Plus • Minus . . 8 3 fi 28 l 1 16? 260 192 98.69 12.58 July 31, 1913 S 5.S 42 e e 166 4«7 343 272.26 28.34 -156 31.00 5.03 Aug. 1, 1913- ( Plus < Minus . . fi 6.7 40 6 7 168 781 413 + 43 June 9, 1914 e 7.S 47 7 5 ;02 813 370 mean was larger by 46 ±46.8 seconds.1 For the year, August 1912- July 1913, the two means were 248.8 and 296.6 seconds (225 and 257 individuals). The difference, —47.8 ±11.9 seconds, was 4.02 times the probable error. The same-day broods for this year-period, of which there were 8, gave a mean of 192 seconds for the plus and of 348 seconds for the minus strain and a difference of —156 ±31.00 seconds — 5.03 times the probable error (table 14). In spite of the irregular course of the curves, the data for this year might seem to indicate a possible (though slight) effect of selection, except for the fact that the further history of the line does not bear out this inter- pretation. For the following year (nearly), which concludes the data for this line, the mean for the plus strain was 391.0 seconds (285 indi- viduals); for the minus strain 416.2 seconds (273 individuals). The difference was —25.2 ±15.2 seconds (table 13) and is not of statisti- cal significance. There were 6 same-day broods for this period, for which the plus mean was 413 seconds and the minus mean 370 seconds (table 14). This difference (±43 seconds), while not of statistical significance, is in the reverse of an effect of selection. No test series were obtained for Line 691. Figure 4 shows the curves of the mean reaction-times for the two strains for Line 691 by two-month periods. The curves are quite irregular and indicate considerable fluctuation in mean re- action-times, particularly for the minus strain, which, except for its wide fluctuations, was persistently the less reactive of the two strains after the first 4 months of selection. The curves for the two strains follow each other in a general way, but are so irregular that they cross 8 times. The rather persistently (though only slightly) higher reaction-time of the minus strain is suggestive of a possible slight 1 There were only 2 same-day broods, involving totals of only 7 individuals in the plus and 8 individuals in the minus strain. The means were 634 and 303 seconds, the difference being + 331 seconds. These broods came in July, when the plus strain was relatively slightly reactive A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 51 effect of selection within this line. However, the actually smaller difference in mean reaction-times during the last year as compared with the preceding year does not lend support to this supposition, and the same-day-brood data for the last longer period are in oppo- sition to an effect of selection, so that a result of selection within Line 691 must be considered very questionable. Obtaining the data for reproductive vigor (from the daily laboratory notes) is laborious and was not done for Line 691 and a number of the other lines in which there was obviously no effect of selection or in which the results were inconclusive. The parallel effect of broad environmental influences upon the reaction-time means for the two strains is shown in the curves (figure 4) for the two strains, they in a general way following the same course. 600 450 300 150 00 4-5 8-9 12-1 4-5 8-9 12-1 4-6 1912 1913 1914 Figure 4. — Line 691. Reaction-time curves. Line 711. Tables 15, 16, 17, and 18 and figure 5 present the data for Line 71 1 Table 15. — Selection data summarized by two-month -periods for Line 711 plus. i o •#5 1 a o ■ a o i a o a a ■n (0 bD a a +3 '3 a IS o s a "3 CJ eS 3 h 5 E I 0 E •M o a g a m 9 a h >> 3 a 3 d ~a a o a *** o -a o a> 3 O a e o -3 3 ii Time period. o a .2 '■♦3 ci o a a 0 aq O o m "o 6 55 >> "o 6 "3 o > "-4J bfl n a --« a « . > o •& Z^3 3-0 > a O 4> 2 * c 1 V 2 S M •a aj E o tc . d d v 11 V -a -3 E 1 -O d 5 00 o E B 09 J3 O E Apr-May 1912.... June-July 1912.... Aug.-Sept. 1912.... Oct.-Nov. 1912 Deo.l912-Jan.1913.. Feb.-Mar. 1913 Apr.-May 1913 7-12 13-17 18-19 20-23 24-31 32-36 37-43 6 6 2 4 8 5 7 30 22 6 14 83 34 62 3 0 0 2 1 0 1 1 8 10 0 0 4 0 0 0 299 345 144 124 114 141 119 148 783 668 220 449 506 397 349 343 13605 11805 1043 _>.'N7.-» 13095 6792 454 537 174 263 276 271 211 189 308.91 38.040 41 77 11.5. . 96.75 10.88 June-July 1913 44-50 7 36 i 52 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF Table 16. — Selection data summarized by two-month periods for Line 711 minus. Time period. a ■ 9 8 •a «•» o a o **J OS fa B a 9 O c c — o 6 y 6 6 :•: 7 B 7 7 6 — - tc c - Q >, E 6 v ~~?. c H 26 :M 5 17 41 43 40 14 I c i o c CD B fa > 03 . "•3 B § o *j £-* 5 = "3 o! '3 - a _ 3 O "0 _ g B § B — • ol "Sf . 03 0 4) 2 E 1 c o •3 □ 8 u B 3 | 'c 1 o M . 03 cj 1 s o 5 eS O fa a I 03 a M . 03 cj u OB 0J J a .2 cj 03 O fa O e 3 0Q • B .2 o 03 5 fa '3 3 ■o ■p 3 _B B oj° 8 J B 03 O) a n .2 03 Q •p fa o3 ■o a 03 «s OQ a 03 a u o K B 09 s 03 .O O fa Pi fa O CO B . 03 S a g fa B -^ 03 . M to Oj — ** 3 "S3 1- o E E — s la tn -^> 03 *** 3 0 2t3 > B B E — * 03 ■s-g . 03 0 ej z - 1 a .2 v» u eS V h B 3 | a a 09 M . ol cj *" e o e ^'5 1 G .2 o 03 o a 3 a 03 a to M . rt oj oj a > ■- i B .2 v> p 03 V h "a 3 "2 '? -3 _B E ai 03 B s"-3 a 03 a *o a .2 03 T) -0 b 03 TJ a 03 CO a 03 B B o o fa fa CO 03 XI O fa b fa a 03 B a B o C 00 ^a §1 C □ U. o 0) • — to -g 6 o a a fa B to •a MM o fa o fa fa B o 3 03 O fa A Difference divided by proba- ble error. Apr. 1912- July 31. 1912 Aug. I. 1912- July 31, 1913 (Plus.... 1 M inu3 . . [Plus.... 1 Minus . . 6-17 6-18 18-50 18-61 12 33 5d 4.3 7.1 5.S 52 235 790 3 t 5 18 4 -4 322 129 164 727 760 397 4^5 488.7 688. S 241.2 286.9 327.7 815.1 163.3 193.8 30.7 30.4 7.2 9.6 -99.6 43. i 2. St -45.7 ij.s 3.84 Table 18. — Same-day broods. Summary of data for Line 7 1 1 . M a 3 O 00 duals b an k. a a a i o 03 OJ fa B o SI >, o3 .- o c 3 a *» ■? ■M o 3 > 13 > 03 03 03 <0 03 3 -c' o Time period. Strain. -o o o fa £ a o > -3 60 "O c B E — a o a * m "5.2 3 *> a '■5 o OS 9 u J>> "a! > c c 3 oi O o a] ft «3 o a) o N E 0 a 03 a O N O a >> Time period. Strain. a to •o o m °5 -a ° £;"« 3 tf c T. w 3 O a 3 a a 3 a "c5 3 "2 ]> a a 0 d a O hi O a 0 * ■4-3 0J CD T3 ■m O M O XI ■a -0 ta a o J o o XI 6 o 55 -a o 0) O o .a . 03 ° £ oi . fcfl m e 2 fl C — c3 a 03 a E S N 8 •a o3 M £ ■■ ■ M . M . 3 XI a; a -O u C N o) XI "o V. o-g 03 Qj eJ - T3 oi «- 0 a3 t. Qi a a O 6 55 10 03 "** . > 1- . OJ 55 B -5** s-8 a 03 CQ XI O c O u Ph its JJ 3-° Apr. 1912- ( Plus I Minus . . 9-18 5.4 54 3 15 232 644 476.7 314.5 28.9 + 17.0 37.6 .45 July 31, 1912 10-19 12 5.7 6/ 2 '4 256 743 459.7 277.4 24-0 Aug. 1, 1912- July 31, 1913 1 Plus I Minus . . 19-53 20-64 37 36 6.4 5.6 236 203 3 7 5 11 139 /S3 401 43i 244.6 255.4 163.0 188.8 7.2 8.9 -40.8 11.5 3.55 Aug. 1. 1913- j Plus ( Minus . . 54-96 A2 9.1 383 28 72 202 667 431.3 287.7 9.9 + 27.0 13.9 1.94 July 31, 1914 63-93 ■',<> 82 327 20 42 774 732 404. 3 261.0 9.7 Test series, j Plus I Minus . . j Plus t Minus . . { Plus 1 Minus . . 80 15 17.9 268 31 12 113 708 265.9 217.1 8.9 + 18.6 11.6 1.58 Mar. 1914. . . Feb. 1914- Apr. 31, 1914 Aug. 1, 1914- July 7. 1915 77 76-84 73-83 97-136 94-139 16 9 to 40 46 ;5.2 8.3 7.1 11.9 273 75 71 477 550 32 4 4 43 85 6 15 9 39 43 720 149 248 145 J4* 629 758 722 633 698 247.3 425.3 457.6 306.0 349.6 181.6 7.4 -32.3 241.3 236.9 7.5 6.8 -43. 6 70./ 4.32 Test series, Mar. 1915... 1 Plus ( Minus . . 125 125 9 9 20.0 /9.5 180 i7S 31 22 19 17 91 i04 778 796 342.9 384-4 247.2 261 .7 12.4 13.2 -41.5 is. 2 2.25 Test series, j Plus ( Minus . . ( Plus t Minus . . 126 32 39.6 1266 66 161 96 817 372.7 265.2 5.0 + 1.0 6.9 .14 Mar. 1915. . . Feb. 1. 1915- Apr. 30, 1915 126 120-130 119-130 88 11 12 39.6 14.3 ii.5 1268 157 247 19 *4 H4 17 ;o 95 104 J02 867 678 602 371.7 335.8 316.6 24s. 4 4-7 + 19.3 Table 20 m — -Same-day broods. Summary of data for Line 7. ?S. V 1 c 0 1 1 a 1 a c O ■ 03 0. 0 0 0 03 IM S XI M to c c c +3 0 0 0 O E a O 3 10 03 o3 03 P 03 2 O C i-i O CS °3 ,.* In »-. h 0 0 e c3 as XI Time period. Strain. 0 0 u ■M O 3 XI a 3 a "a 3 "2 > '•5 a >> > 03 . bC •/ 0 — . c 2 9] — "3 — 3 O 3 -a > a ■ - 4) C 3 ■" 03 S 3 a a a 3 g £ "3 3 •a '> -3 c 0 2 '> -0 13 a 0 u 0 H O s « ^> c 0 — -° a 0 h O lH hi 0J •3 m-b — 5 t— — W M C3 XI O) C3 X! - C 6 55 2 0 0 6 55 o.sl . > 1- . oi O OJ 55 M s 2 03 oj C 0 1:3 £ •a a 03 W 03 XI O H Ph h" «. 03 XI 0 u Ph k. OJ Q^3 Apr. 13. 1912- July 31, 1912 j Plus ( Minus . . 3 3 2.7 3 0 8 9 2 0 2 7 338 325 403 660 490 437 +53 Aug. 1, 1912- July 31, 1913 j Plus I Minus . . 14 u 7.1 7.4 100 103 1 3 1 9 130 248 389 541 234 154.42 208.08 i6.42 13.83 -88 17.31 5.05 Aug. 1, 1913- j Plus 7 8.9 62 5 24 343 829 620 290 . 23 24.86 + 240 34.44 6.96 July 31, 1914 7 5.4 69 5 7 i#4 76 < S50 277 . 45 23.54 Aug. 1, 1914- July 7, 1915 j Plus t Minus . . 14 u 13.8 193 184 15 29 17 12 125 146 690 656 305 333 -25 difficult to ignore the very consistent differences between the two strains after the first 4 months of the experiment. It is to be re- gretted that no test series was conducted with this line. This case is very similar to that for Line 689, with which there was a similar difference, but in the reverse direction. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. or, With Line 711, as well as with most of the other lines, the courses of the curves for the two strains illustrate the marked effect of environmental influences upon reaction-time (figure 5). Line 713. The data for Line 713 are shown in tables 19 and 20 and in figure 6. Scarcely more than a glance at figure 6 is necessary to convince one that with Line 713 there was no effect of selection, though the selection data for the last year period are suggestive of a possible selective effect. Environmental influences were obviously at play in directing the general course of the curves, which follow each other in an interesting way. The curve for the plus strain is quite irregular, while that for the minus strain is surprisingly free from large minor fluctuations. 600 4-50 300 150 OO 4.-5 8-9 12-1 4-5 8-9 12-1 4-5 8-9 12-1 A-5 1912 1913 1914 1915 Figure 6. — Line 713. Reaction-time curves. For the first 4 months the means for the two strains were 476.7 and 459.7 seconds (table 19). The difference is +17.0 ±37.5 seconds. There were 3 very small same-day broods for each strain, with the average for the plus strain 53 seconds the larger (table 18). The large upshoot in the curve for the plus strain for June-July is from an average obtained from a very small number of individuals. The data for the year, August 1912-July 1913, show these means for the plus and minus strains: 244.6 and 285.4 seconds. The difference is —40.8 ±11.5 seconds, 3.55 times the probable error. The 14 same-day broods for this period have as averages 233.7 and 321.9 seconds, the minus-strain average being larger by 8S ±17.31 seconds. The extremely fluctuating course of the curves for this year-period indicates that the differences obtained are not due to an effect of selection. During the next year, August 1913-July 1914, the plus mean is higher by 27.0 ±13.89 seconds. (The plus mean is 431.3 seconds and the minus mean 404.3 seconds.) The 7 same-day broods averaged 56 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF 620 and 380 seconds, the plus mean being 240 ±34.44 seconds the larger.1 A small test series (268 and 273 individuals in the two strains) conducted during March 1914, gave 265.9 and 247.3 seconds as the plus and minus mean reaction-times (table 19). The difference ( + 18.6 ±11.62 seconds) was 1.58 times the probable error. For the final year of the experiment with Line 713 (August 1914-July 7, 1915) the means were 306.0 and 349.6 seconds. The difference was -43.6 ±10.1 seconds, or 4.32 times the probable error. For the 14 same-day broods the means were 305 and 333 seconds, the difference being only —28 seconds. Two test series were conducted during March of this year. The first consisted of a com- paratively small number of individuals (180 and 178). The means were 342.9 and 384.4 seconds. The difference (-41.5 ±18.15 seconds) is 2.28 times the probable error and is not a significant difference. A much larger and more adequate test series was con- ducted after that just referred to. The numbers were 1,266 and 1,268 for the plus and minus strains, respectively. The means were 372.7 and 371.7 seconds. The difference was only +1.0 ±6.88 seconds. This test series was conducted with every care and it is believed may safely be regarded as a crucial test. It brings out clearly enough that, in spite of the small but rather consistent dif- ference in mean reaction-times during the last year of the experi- ment, there is not an effect of selection in Line 713. Line- 714. Line 714 was one of the original lines of D. pulex. Selection was begun in the eighth generation and continued for more than 53 months, 184 generations in the plus strain and 196 generations in the minus strain. The data for Line 714 are given in tables 21 and 22 and in figure 7. For the first 4 months of the experiment the mean reaction-time for the plus strain was 495.4 and for the minus strain 618.9 seconds (table 21). The difference was rather large (-123.5 ±32.0 seconds, 3.86 times the probable error). There were only two small same- day broods for this period (table 22), for which the mean for the minus strain was 231 seconds the larger. For the year-period (August 1, 1912-July 31, 1913) the mean reaction-time for the plus strain was 309.2 seconds and that for the minus strain 278.5 seconds. The difference was +30.7 ±12.4 seconds (2.48 times the probable error). This difference is in the reverse direction to that for the earlier (four-month) period. The 3 same-day broods had a mean for the plus strain 226 ±27.62 seconds the larger. 1Oi these 7 same-day broods, 4 occurred during May, when the plus strain for some un- accounted-for reason was rather non-reactive for D. pulex. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 57 For the next year-period (August 1, 1913-July 31, 1914) the means were 406.4 and 439.2 seconds. The difference (-32.8 ±14.5 Table 21. — Selection summary for Line 714- Time period. Strain. •** a eo o CO to -0 o CO a _o '-3 05 b 3 a CO 9 » CO o o £ -O o CO o of-S 1 S3 1 3 3 +-> s s £ c o '2. . o! ° s oJ -H ■ M c 0 03 00 b _>> "a) > 03 . cjO qo " 3 1- 0 -*j M -M C C ;d 03 Eh -^ ■— to -d CO ,- 03 ■— 3 O > a 0 a ■" 03 0 -^ w CO . 03 0 to S3 - 1 a .2 . JQ T) c '> co C eo to.2 Apr. 1, 1912- July 31, 1912 Aug. 1, 1912- July 31, 1913 Aug. 1, 1913- July 31, 1914 Aug. 1, 1914- July 31, 1915 Test series, Oct., 1914... Sept. 1, 1914- Nov.31,1914 Test series, Nov. 1914. . . Oct. 1, 1914- Dec. 31, 1914 Test series, Mar., 1915. . Feb. 1, 1915- Apr. 30, 1915 Aug. 1, 1915- July 31, 1916 Aug. 1, 1916- Sept.16, 1916 ( Plus I Minus . . ( Plus ( Minus . . ( Plus I Minus . . ( Plus 1 Minus . . ( Plus I Minus . . j Plus I Minus . . ( Plus I Minus . . < Plus l Minus . . | Plus ( Minus . . ( Plus ( Minus . . ( Plus ( Minus . . ( Plus I Minus . . 8-21 8-21 22-55 22-54 56-100 65-101 101-144 102-147 112 114 105-116 107-118 113 115 109-121 111-123 129 131 125-135 127-138 145-185 148-195 186-194 196-202 13 ii ;>,\; 36 44 if>; 41 45 It; 16 VI 12 35 86 13 IS 36 S6 10 IS 37 89 7 7 4.6 e.5 6.1 6.5 6.9 7.4 9.3 /0.S 15.6 18.1 10.4 //.5 30.1 s/./ 11.2 11.9 31.2 S/.5 10.2 13.2 11.5 //./ 9.4 7.t9 55 7/ 220 229 311 349 383 ^65 249 289 125 ;ss 1055 1089 145 755 1123 ms 102 159 427 ■W 66 53 4 / 10 31 30 39 73 39 47 17 25 244 277 24 36 242 i9S 6 20 36 35 3 3 12 23 9 S 39 68 52 4? 8 18 13 2 86 SO 9 0 195 /Si 9 8 41 35 16 S 257 326 164 153 197 2/0 169 170 105 95 167 /07 108 96 130 97 96 93 101 110 107 /OS 146 87 695 717 440 658 702 724 697 738 734 739 609 841 S47 691 696 804 S32 711 529 662 728 762 5. u-t O 6 •z, 00 . CO 3 '? .S *^< 0 6 t M C O 03 CO u _>> "00 o3 . bC co a § O^ I13 0 ^ 03 03 +^ :>^ -d <» a a ■" 03 o-g . o3 O

M a 3 a •a 1 to on . 03 CO s a 1 d .2 03 3 M a 3 03 a s M . 03 0 v a 1 d _o "*> CO 03 CO M "3 3 T3 '? •9 _d a 00 g a a 03 00 a 0 a 0 '■♦0 03 f O T3 T3 E C3 T! d 03 CO a 03 0 a "o u 0 h E CO 0 03 J2 0 E £ u 0 a . os 5 Cv C a '3 CO ® to 0] * 2 •*> d CO ■- ^ a c 5 CO 03 b _ i d 0 E CO a •9 «^« 0 b O fi E O CO 3 •3 x> 0 b ft. Difference divided by proba- ble error. Apr. 13, 1912- July 31, 1912 Aug. 1, 1912- July 31, 1913 Aug. 1, 1913- July 31, 1914 Aug. 1, 1914- July 31, 1915 Aug. 1, 1915- July 31, 1916 Aug. 1, 1916- Sept.16, 1916 ( Plus I Minus . . ( Plus I Minus . . 1 Plus ( Minus . . I Plus t Minus . . ( Plus I Minus . . ( Plus I Minus . . 2 2 ■A 8 0 6 \:\ i;-; r> 5 V, 6 2.5 6.6 6.0 2.7 5.3 6.8 9.9 12.7 11.6 9.4 8.5 8.0 5 13 18 8 32 36 129 165 58 47 51 48 0 / 1 0 3 0 19 29 11 6 3 3 1 7 4 0 4 5 26 5 3 12 S 190 290 340 /S5 275 283 117 Z2S 113 /// 155 88 528 790 667 228 600 675 657 700 720 722 739 627 438 669 429 203 292 397 292 406 342 331 403 361 261.04 274-24 289.06 91.12 250.26 269.48 203.96 289.43 78.74 61 SO 17.05 21.73 29.84 SO. 7 2 12.12 15.20 -23/ + 226 9S.98 27.62 2.46 8.18 -105 4*.ss t.46 -114 i9.4-< 5.86 seconds) is 2.26 times the probable error. There were 6 rather small same-day broods, for which the mean for the minus strain was 105 ±42.82 seconds the larger. Again, as compared with the pre- 58 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF 2.00 1.50 1.00 .50 00 ceding long period, there is a reversal in this longer period of the direction of the difference in the mean reaction-times for the entire data and in that for the same-day broods. For the next year-period (August 1, 1914-July 31, 1915), the means were 378.1 and 362.3 seconds. The difference, which was + 15.8 ± 12.3 seconds, is not statistically significant and is again in the reverse direction from that for the preceding period. During this year-period the same-day-brood data consisted of 13 broods and 4-5 8-9 12-1 4-5 8-9 12-1 4-5 8-9"^ 12-1 4-5 8-9 12-1 4-5 8"9 1912 1913 1914 1913 A i ii, \ii\i l 1915 1916 ? * t • ° * i l- 1 n . lllB.t. T I _ 6 ^~S~ TIT o - .75 • .50 1 J f .25 00 .25 13 41 o en XI o o t- -2 <*- 0 6 Z -d > *o 6 — o E-" u oi a. M a a o ««-» o d . ** o o o i. hOJ2 Average age of mothers at time first broods were pro- duced. Average No. of individuals per first brood divided by average age of mothers. a 60 a 33 o c! 5 N _>. > OS . 60 JQ 0j .3 a 3 i* o «-» 1£ -"■' C = r3 *j "3 >~ 3 O > C X> □ a — CO *— — u ti . es O 4) 2; * 1 a .2 o ol 6 In S 3 a a 1 41 °* . 03 oi u a P 1 a o "-C p ej 9 u a 3 a H OS a M . C3 41 i- - m o J i c o *•£ ci OS 3 E "o a 3 03 i c _o Cv i 9 E "3 3 •o •P XJ 0 S 0) g.e a* d a ■ a «•* o a o > 01 XI X! E OS a el 44 co d a ■ a ■M o k O E E o ■ 3 1 o E Cm Apr.-May 1912... June-July 1912... Aug.-Sept. 1912... Oct.-Nov. 1912. . . Dec. 1912-Jan. 1913 Feb.-Mar. 1913... Apr.-May 1913... June-July 1913... Aug.-Sept. 1913... Oct.-Nov. 1913. . . Dec.1913- Jan. 1914 Feb.-Mar. 1914... Apr.-May 1914... June-July 1914... Aug.-Sept. 1914... Oct.-Nov. 1914. . . Dec. 1914-Jan. 1915 Feb.-Mar. 1915. . . Apr.-May-June '15 9-13 14-19 20-21 21-24 25-31 32-38 39-45 46-54 55-62 63-68 69-75 76-81 82-90 91-96 97-104 105-113 114-121 122-127 128-137 8 6 2 4 7 7 7 9 8 5 7 6 9 6 8 9 8 5 10 27 51 3 16 67 51 47 57 86 37 48 32 81 31 73 108 65 59 79 6.8 6.8 1.5 2.3 10.2 7.3 6.7 6.0 9.2 6.3 6.2 5.6 8.5 4.6 9.6 12.2 8.1 12.5 8.4 9.6 11.4 11.5 12.8 9.1 8.5 8.3 7.2 6.3 7.5 8.4 8.8 7.1 7.2 7.1 7.4 7.9 9.1 8.2 0.71 .60 .13 .18 1.12 .86 .81 .83 1.46 .84 .74 .64 1.20 .64 1.35 1.65 1.03 1.37 1.02 0 4 0 0 2 1 1 2 9 2 1 0 13 6 11 24 3 9 6 16 3 0 0 6 5 0 12 7 0 9 3 11 9 13 2 9 7 18 214 240 288 220 115 147 111 173 105 141 319 233 186 326 165 87 119 137 315 534 635 295 448 476 437 316 595 539 394 725 626 801 814 834 517 698 623 768 15738 19370 825 4138 18737 16685 9910 22603 31176 9044 L, •>_>,,,, 14002 34353 18139 33103 28021 24354 20971 33398 583 380 275 259 280 327 211 397 363 244 465 438 424 585 453 259 375 355 423 224 . 17 21.17 251.87 18.32 258.36 25.15 248.35 30.09 297.34 22.57 Table 24. — Selection data summarized by two-month periods for Line 719 minus. Time period. a s o 03 3 X) ■M o 3 o 03 Ut V a co a X X> 0 3 **. O 6 Z ■6 3 •*» tx a 3 0 >. o d V. "3 o EH X) Q 4* CQ > d o cm a! kr Ol -J) a CO u o O o *— o °3 tC CO 05 £ M ° 0) g Average No. of young per first brood divided by average age of mothers. a tt e O 03 O M _>. "53 > 03 . c£ co v "S a g •S3 I1 o $M S e '3 *■ •« 41 _m ^ 3 O •■5 " a a •- ' 03 o-g . OS 0 g; z u 1 a .2 1 M a 3 a a 41 M . 03 41 41 g <* 1 a 0 v> 0 d G a 3 a a cm g 41 0 a 3 .a ■ a '■2 03 4) E "o a 3 GO 1 a 0 4J 4> 03 4) E "3 3 •a a d 4) g a S"-3 d OS 0 a O d 0 '■2 03 ■> cp XI XI E 03 X) d oS 49 CO d OS 41 a O b O ■4 E 41 0) d O E Cm O ■ a . gs £E g <•> 0 ^ c 5 4, a II 41 0 a 41 E 4> xi O u 0 E E 41 41 3 03 .a 0 E a, ■ tj jS 0 E a >> ja ■a 41 XI > d k. it ■ B3 Apr.-May 1912... June-July 1912... Aug.-Sept. 1912. ... Oct.-Nov. 1912. . . Dec. 1912-Jan. 1913 Feb.-Mar. 1913 . . . Apr.-May 1913... June-July 1913. . . Aug.-Sept. 1913... Oct.-Nov. 1913. . . Dec. 1913-Jan. 1914 Feb.-Mar. 1914. . . Apr.-May 1914... June-July 1914.. . Aug.-Sept. 1914... Oct.-Nov. 1914 . . . Dec. 1914-Jan. 1915 Feb.-Mar. 1915. .. Apr.,May,Ju£e,1915 9-14 15-21 22-24 25-28 29-36 37-42 43-50 51-58 59-67 68-74 75-81 82-89 90-97 98-105 106-112 113-120 121-128 129-135 136-145 7 8 3 6 8 6 8 10 9 7 7 7 8 8 7 s 8 7 9 37 39 4 15 55 35 'id 11 74 50 58 40 si S3 50 83 S7 70 85 6.2 5.6 1.3 1.5 6.9 5.8 7.5 4.6 8.2 8.0 8.3 5.7 5.7 7.8 6.6 9.5 10.9 9.5 8.1 9.1 8.5 17.5 19.5 8.4 9.0 7.4 7.2 7.0 8.1 8.3 9.0 6.9 7.8 7.3 7.4 7.8 8.5 7.8 0.68 .66 .07 .08 .82 .64 1.00 .64 1.17 .99 1.00 .63 .83 1.00 .90 1.28 1.39 1.12 1.04 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 4 8 0 4 2 4 10 15 20 9 8 19 14 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 3 5 2 22 "9 6 5 5 7 6 292 210 200 184 93 126 ]L'4 255 101 149 179 255 229 210 206 183 ir,s 116 147 896 719 251 239 333 353 423 492 634 403 701 722 837 791 769 646 697 639 606 21155 16320 854 3S09 12566 7938 15220 13543 18502 14036 mt'iSL' 16870 36841 29417 20071 22045 31633 26135 22580 572 418 214 254 22S 227 254 330 250 251 374 439 467 401 LV.r, 364 873 347 + 11 -38 + 61 + 5 + 52 + 100 -43 +67 + 113 -7 + 91 + 16 -15 + 118 + 52 -7 + 11 -18 + 76 113.26 12.91 24.79 4.03 196.73 15.43 23.94 4.72 207.78 18.40 31.17 2.91 241. IS 20.50 36.40 3.24 257.35 21.53 31.18 2.43 62 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF During the year (August 1912-July 1913) the means were 302.5 and 256.3 seconds. The difference (+46.2 ±12.1 seconds) is 3.81 times the probable error, a difference statistically significant. For the 12 same-day broods the means are 314 and 254 seconds — and the difference is +60 ± 21.68 seconds, 2.76 times the probable error. Table 25. — Selection summary for Line 719. a a> cj m oj 73 oj "3 . -O OJ ■p-s "* en 1 CO 9 -^ CO to C "3.2 3 -> 3 8 i _e 60 a '— o OS 5 M >> o 60-^ c a a ca -, -a 1 d .2 %j a OB o s 3 1 .2 '~ 03 9 h 3 3 ■ d .2 o rt o "si a a 9 3 "o a o a 03 3 1 V t-, 0 a 0) 3 a e 0 u d 3 V to 'a ■ S3 XI O u A >> T3 O Time period. Strain. o ■ a m — o o u a o o Z-a o OJ o •a m 3 60 •" a ■— .H O M . oS ° £ 3 a) . 60 to "1 3 O > a -a ° Tj a c — ' 03 '3 3 o S '* OS 3 OJ 3 •a .5 J3 2 > -a •a 14 0 [4 g 09 -*^ a> .t. m 3 u 0 u u 9 0 ■a •a r £ OJ 60 b 60 60 . C3 £> O d XI E 3 a a O c 6 03 -O < 03 "H . > 1- w oj . ca o a 2 u 2 ° oj 3 03 oj o g a o> g 3 ■8 a 03 CO OS O b 1- O s * eS ^3 O h Pi Apr. 1912- July 31, 1912 ( Plus 1 Minus . . 9-19 9-21 14 In 5.6 5./ 78 76 4 0 19 21 225 251 577 SOS 450.1 493.1 275.3 308.4 21.0 23. S -43.0 81.8 1.85 Aug. 1, 1912- ( Plus • Minus . . j Plus 20-54 36 6.7 241 6 23 156 454 302.5 232.3 10.1 + 46.2 12.1 3.81 July 31, 1913 Aug. 1, 1913- 22-58 55-96 41 11 5./ 7.7 270 315 10 31 / 39 /64 215 372 664 256. S 409.6 14^.9 257.6 6.6 9.8 +43.3 13.2 3.28 July 31, 1914 Test series, t Minus . . J Plus ( Minus . . j Plus ( Minus . . ( Plus 1 Minus . . j Plus 1 Minus . . j P1U3 ( Minus . . 69-105 89 46 23 8.2 13.9 375 320 *?S 96 45 82 185 156 685 879 366.3 520.8 255.8 289.2 8.9 10.9 +57.2 14.9 3.83 May 1914 .. Apr. 1, 1914- June31, 1914 Aug. 1, 1914- 96 82-93 90-101 97-137 28 12 12 40 /4-4 8.2 9.0 9.6 33/ 98 /OS 384 121 15 5 53 60 16 23 49 /o4 224 224 172 SOS 826 693 463.6 453.7 434.5 364.2 271.9 10.1 + 19.2 264.9 9.1 + 19.2 12.5 1.53 June25, 1915 Test series, 1 06-145 110 39 43 3./ 22.8 355 979 7/ 189 29 46 164 95 668 688 345.0 310.9 239.8 217.2 8.6 4.7 +20.3 6.3 3.22 Nov. 1914. . Oct. 1, 1914- Dec. 31, 1914 118 105-117 113-124 4S 13 12 2S.7 9.9 11.1 /0/0 129 133 217 27 25 35 3 6 /OS 93 161 637 511 644 290.6 261.1 288.1 197.0 4.* -27.0 Table 26. — Same-day broods. Summary of data for Line 719. u 0 t d 0 1 ■ d 1 d a u 0 ■ 03 a. ■rt O 0 0 c3 **H S a 60 d 3 60 a a a «3 0 0 -*3 O OJ £ a . a 0 -m a cs ra *^ c3 C3 C3 a 03 » 0J d u 0 P, Time period. Strain. 00 -a 0 0 1- X) 0 >> O u S J3 3 3 d pa "3 3 •a ■p ■a d C3 01 "3 > OS . 60 m a 2 ^_ c; "3 — 3 0 2-o > a a oj 'a a a — ' OS a 3 3 'a 1 M 3 3 I 03 3 0) u "3 3 •a '> '•& a 0 d 0 03 '> 0J ■a T3 OJ 3 "3 u 0 Bh M 0J 0J 3 '3 d *3 3 «o 0J 05 & 3 -w C OJ •« *> 3 OJ ^ 0 2 d a to -a "3 0 g 0J OJ >> a ■a 0J •a •p ■3 a ^ <*- 0 6 ■M O 6 o3 1- . oS O B . T T T ] r t t t J i t - o A A j, < >, 0 H.25 00 .25 .50 600 h 450 300 - 150 - Figure 8. — Line 719. A. Reproductive indices, actual values. B. Reproductive indices, superiority. C. Reaction-time curves with a superimposed curve (in faint broken line) representing the combined reaction-time means for the minus strains of all Daphnia pulex lines in which significant reaction-time differences probably did not arise. the mean for the minus strain of Line 719 (figure 8c) shows that beginning with August 1912 and continuing to January 1914 the mean for the minus strain of Line 719 was lower than that for the combined mean for the other minus strains for the same two-month periods in 8 of 9 two-month periods; 6 of these differences (ranging from 48 to 197 seconds) were of statistical value and one other just escaped- statistical significance because of the small numbers of reaction-time records involved. From February 1914 the minus A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 65 strain of Line 719 continued more reactive than the combined means of the other lines for 10 months, but the differences were small and not of statistical value. For the remaining 7 months of the curve the differences were variable and the mean for the plus strain did not differ appreciably from the composite curve of means for the corre- sponding plus strains. The evidence seems suggestive of a mutation in the minus strain of Line 719, rendering it the more reactive to light. Since the differ- ence between the mean for the minus strain of Line 719 and the plus strain of the same line, as well as between the Line 719 minus strain and the combined means for the minus strains of the lines, which may fairly serve as checks, later decreased and was apparently practically lost, it seems probable that selection served to reduce or eliminate the effect of this apparent mutation. This reduction in (or possible elimination of) the reaction-time difference in Line 719 is worthy of consideration as contrasted with Line 757, in which the difference in reaction-time (which in that case is in the direction attempted in selection) became larger and larger in successive year-periods, until, instead of being a difference of 5.5 per cent, as in the last period of selection in Line 719, it was 99 per cent in the last year-period for Line 757. Line 719 affords a case parallel to that of Line 689, in which the plus strain likewise persistently had a higher reaction-time, contrary to any influence of selection. With Line 689 the period of the experi- ment was much shorter, but otherwise the results are very similar, except that in Line 719 the difference is not so large or so uniform, is not supported by most of the same-day-brood data, and became much smaller during the latter part of the experiment. It is to be noted with Line 719 that in reproductive vigor the minus strain was in general inferior to the plus strain. This was markedly true during the first and the last year-periods. The minus strain was slightly superior in vigor during the second year-period. Yet the minus strain was the more reactive throughout all these year-periods and was (absolutely) somewhat less reactive during its year of superior vigor (August 1913-July 1914) than during the other two years. The curves for the mean reaction-times by two-month periods (figure 8c) indicate an interesting correlation between the means for the two strains, the plus and minus curves, in spite of their fluctua- tions, following each other remarkably closely. This is again an expression of environmental effect. The small and variable, though fairly pronounced, superiority in reactiveness on the part of the minus strain for most of the period of selection is rendered even more interesting by the fact that the differences persist while the curves sweep up and down under environmental influences. 66 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF Line 751. Line 751 was obtained in October 1912 from the surface-water pond on the upland (Pond I), from which Line 689 came a year earlier.1 Selection was begun at once. This is the only line of Daph- nia pulex with which selection was not begun during March 1912, after having been in the laboratory from 5 to 8 generations before Table 27 — Selection summary for Line 75/. Time period. Strain. a 3 a eo B •a o 00 a o 03 y o a 3 o -6 w -^ 00 $ DO ■a 0 o u X) O 6 'A JO "e3 . £T vt 2 © o o £ -O o oj o a X » s 3a Total No. of individuals test- ed in making selections. i a M a c 03 M % > M in a 3 "S3 . > 1- o *j a a ■~ 03 rrs -*> £ CD .4 03 *** 3 O 2 -a > a xi * a a — 03 "5 & " o . 03 O 4> 1 a o e3 3 M S a [a £ o m . C3 oj l- — OJ c 1 d o 03 O U a 3 a '53 03 a a bo . 03 cj « 6 3* • 0 _o '£ o 03 3 y "3 a "2 |P t3 a a oi o3 a a a) V a IM O a .2 2 '? y 03 a o! CO a 03 9 a «^» o 14 o H y 9 0) 03 X> o y PL, h a 03 9 a a 3 V & -*> . V 00 o a o '-5 O %4 Ph 1 M a >> 8 ■a ■p •3 fi b S2 g S 5* Nov. 13, 1912- July 31, 1913 Aug. 1, 1913- June 11, 1914 Test series, Jan. 1914 Dec. 1, 1913- Feb. 28, 1914 j Plus < Minus . . ( Plus 1 Minus . . f Plus I Minus . . ( Plus 1 Alinus . . 1-31 1-31 32-71 32-70 54 63 48-58 47-57 32 S3 in 40 17 1? 11 11 8.2 8.0 8.3 19.3 8.0 5.5 261 267 321 331 328 327 88 64 10 ;5 14 27 19 J6 3 8 5 31 41 50 10 10 139 *# 177 187 140 i40 207 £50 450 459 657 S4S 752 738 688 tf> ^5 Time period. Strain. cri O c u X) ■M o 6 00 3 "2 '> "3 a O "3 U 00 H 2 00 _C 1 ° ■g T3 .5 a ■a «» a a ""■ 03 a 3 a I to a 3 a 03 a "oS 3 ;p -3 a a o 03 0J •d a ■M 0 y o y y 0) V fl) on ► 2 II .<= a d a o u o E 3 o3 XI o 6 o 6 1- . 03 03 cu >- - CD B c3 oi S E ■5* a o g a s'5 ■a a 03 CO 03 XI O t-i Ph C3 XI O y Ph 5-° Nov. 13, 1912- ( Plus ia 7.4 119 8 5 166 489 325 204.06 12.62 +37 16.02 2.30 July 31, 1913 Aug. 1, 1913- June 11, 1914 ffl 8.4 135 13 « it55 475 5cS2 months, the mean reaction-times were 375.4 seconds and 400.7 seconds for the plus and minus strains, respectively. The dif- ference was -25.3 ±13.46 seconds, a difference not of statistical sig- nificance. There was again a considerable number of same-day broods (13), for which the mean reaction-times were 350 and 345 seconds and the difference +5 seconds. A test series conducted in January 1914, consisting of 328 indi- viduals in the plus strain and 327 individuals in the minus strain, gave a mean reaction-time of 416.1 seconds for the plus strain and 433.9 seconds for the minus strain. The difference was -17.8 ±13.9 seconds. This difference like the others is not of statistical value. A curve for the reaction-time means of this line is shown in figure 9 and, like the numerical summaries just considered, shows that there is probably no effect of selection. There is just a possible suggestion of an effect of selection, however, in the last year's data, inasmuch as during this period the plus strain was continuously the more reactive, except for one two-month period. But in view of the great fluctuation in the reaction-time curves for the other lines subjected to selection, this suggestion has little weight. There is a feature of interest in the curves for this line, as with many other lines, the general close correspondence in the levels of the plus and minus curves in the different two-month periods; on the whole they sweep upward and downward together, an expression of a parallel effect of environment upon the two strains. It is a matter of interest and some importance to note that the means for the two strains of Line 751 start at approximately the same levels which were held by the other D. pulex selection lines (Lines 689, 691, 695, 711, 713, 714, and 719) during the same two- month period, although the other lines had been subjected to labora- tory culture for approximately a year and to selection for 8 months before Line 751 was brought into the laboratory. Comparison of the curves for Line 751 (figure 9) and for the other D. pulex lines (figures 2c, 3c, 4, 5, 6, 7c, and 8c) and with the composite curves for all the D. pulex plus and minus strains (figure 10d, on which the curves for Line 751 are superimposed), strikingly brings out this fact. This is important as showing that under laboratory conditions strains of A 450 — //Sv ' "" A-7 v' 300 - /\ // \y^ - 150 - 11— 1 4-5 8-9 12-1 4-6 nn 1913 191* Figure 9. — Line 751. Reaction-time curves. 68 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF a given species tend to have approximately the same reaction-time means, regardless of the length of their previous laboratory history. Line 762. Line 762 was one of the two lineally distinct line's of D. longispina subjected to selection. It was obtained October 19, 1912, from Pond I, one of the surface-water ponds on the upland, and was subjected to selection at once. This is a less favorable species for selection on the basis of reactiveness to light than the other species used. While it is moderately reactive, it does not so readily withstand the hand- ling, and individuals sometimes become disabled or become lodged in the surface film of the water. The summary of the data for Line 762 is found in table 29 and in figure 10a. The experiment with this line was of relatively short duration (10 months) as compared with the other lines, due to the Table 29. — Selection summary for Line 762. Time period. Strain. 43 a oj o oo oj 73 ■M o 00 a h to a o T3 oj 43 03 0J 43 m ~ o c .fi U-. 0 6 JO "3 . T3 oj >-£ .- oj T3 43 ^_ O w 43 . **- o o o oj o of-S ■ 43 pa O "3.2 3 43 -a a .s oj >S ■3 m P tc — a — — o ^ . 03 ° s _ B oJ " 1* ■ .5 M C 43 o OS o u >> "a! 43 05 . M tn a § •ss 1* o 43 c c a o3 O? 43 C3 m-i 3 O > C ;£ oj S3 C •" 03 "8 -9 . cS O 0J 1 a p o OS (D u E 3 E '3 1 V M . 03 oj a) S 31 i a .2 03 s O h O H h S 03 x> O H Ph i OJ M 13 CO OJ s a OJ & 3- ■- ra ■°1 © H c - -^r O fl> ••-* to-g OJ CJ a OJ h OJ s T3 ■M o (4 o H g OJ OJ 03 ^O O 14 Ph Difference divided by proba- ble error. Nov. 1912- July 31, 1913 Aug. 1, 1913- Sept. 8, 1913 ( Plus t Minus . . ( Plus t Minus . . 1-30 1-28 31-36 29-35 31 31 6 7 6.9 6.4 9.8 11. 3 215 59 79 1 3 1 S 21 4 2i 168 111 573 581 S00 366.2 377.3 269.3 482.3 229.2 257.1 224.1 305.5 10.5 12.3 19.7 2S.2 -11.1 16.19 .69 -213.0 30.42 7.00 accidental loss of the plus strain in September 1913. Shortly after this loss the experiment was resumed by selecting in both directions from the minus strain. The line was henceforth designated Line 766. This was in effect a return selection within the minus strain.1 The data for the first nine-month period (November 1912- July 1913, table 29) gives reaction-time means of 366.2 and 377.3 seconds. The difference ( — 11.1 ±16.19 seconds) is not significant. The 10 same-day broods for this line, comprised mostly of broods produced during June and July, gave the following means: 355 seconds for the plus strain (57 individuals) and 349 seconds for the minus strain (54 individuals). The same-day-brood data rather clearly substantiate the conclusion which the curves (figure 10a) suggest, that until that time there was no effect of selection. For the final portion of the experiment, a little more than a month (until the plus strain was lost), the plus strain was markedly 1 It is unfortunate that return selections were not conducted in other lines, particularly in Line 757. The return selection in Line 762 (which then became Line 766) is not significant as a return selection, because presumably there was not an effect of selection within Line 762. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 69 600 450 300 150 the more reactive, the means being 269 and 482 seconds and the difference -213 ± 30.42 seconds. There is, moreover, an interesting difference noted between every plus brood and every minus brood tested during this period. Without exception the plus broods were considerably more reactive than the minus broods tested at the nearest dates. Such a consistent difference in reactiveness involving every individual brood1 is not generally found in the data obtained from these selection experiments, except in portions of the data for Line 757, in which a pronounced .effect of selection was obtained. 750 r- 1913 4-5 8-9 1914 4-5 8-9 1915 4-5 8-9 1916 4-5 8 00 ■ 4-5 8-9 1912 12-1 4-5 8-9 1913 12-1 4-5 8-9 1914 12-1 4-5 8-9 1915 12-1 4-5 8-9 1916 Figure 10. A, B, C. Reaction-time curves for Daphnia longispina — Lines 762, 766, and 768, respectively . D. Composite reaction-time curves for all plus and all minus strains of Daphnia pulex with reaction-time curves for Line 751 superimposed. The divergence in reaction-time means for this last two-month period and particularly the complete and unusual consistency of differences in reaction-time, brood by brood, for this last period suggest an effect of selection. The amount of these data is too small to be more than slightly suggestive, but it seems quite possible that a mutation occurred in the plus strain of Line 762, thus producing » It will be remembered that temporary enviromental conditions are very potent factors in modifying the reaction-time means of individual broods and that consequently rather wide fluctuations occur in all the data. Hence, only in cases in which the reactiveness of the two strains differs greatly do we fail to find the reaction-time means for different broods of the two strains of a line overlapping to a wide degree. 70 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF the great lowering of the plus mean and the marked differences in reactiveness between the two strains not present earlier. Line 766. As noted above, the two strains of this line were derived from the minus strain of Line 762. The minus strain was a continuation of the minus strain of Line 762, the selection having been inter- rupted for three generations. The plus strain of Line 766 was de- rived from the minus strain of Line 762 by selecting the most reactive individual from the thirty-ninth generation of the minus strain of that line. The summary of the data is given in table 30 and figure 10b. Selection was continued for only 7 months, when it was interrupted by the loss of the plus strain. A rather wide difference 3n mean reaction-times for the first two-month period is not continued during the remainder of the ex- Table 3 0.— Selection summary /or Line 766. GO i a o 1 1 a 1 a a ■ OJ oj 1 SS O 0 0 03 Xl a o> o m oj 4^ -2^ en 03 O M c u 03 CO S a ~ 03 '3 ^ <*- GJ O C3 0) S •*> 0 5 t-. a *3 0 03 S u a "o c a 03 0J a b 03 OJ a a OJ b OJ s -3 0 a XI ■0 Time period. Strain. T3 o 00 0J *a GO O O T3 CO .9 M 03 «„ 3 O t> 0 3 a •a 3 a •a 03 3 > 09 0 u 0 3 s 0 CO 0 h O OJ ■O > t3 a 0 o u J3 S5 -d o aj o O 'Tj ° B 03 . a 2 a a — ' 03 a (O a OJ -a a T3 T3 3 aj 0j H B L OJ OJ 03 be £ M . M . 03 .£> S B X £ t u 03 X — a 1- 0 •?, 13 03 1- O 03 tH OJ a o 6 03 — ' . 03 O 1' IS 7.0 6.4 154 116 1 10 18 182 222 622 635 327.0 SS5.S 247.3 268.8 13.4 16.8 -58.8 21.54 2.7« periment. The mean reaction-times for the two strains for the entire period of the experiment were 327 and 385.8 seconds (table 30). While the difference is -58.8 seconds and is 2.72 times the probable error, it is largely due to the difference in mean-reaction time obtaining for the first two months. There were two same-day broods containing totals of only 1 1 and 9 individuals in the plus and minus strains, respectively. The averages were 222 and 250 seconds and the difference was — 28 seconds, a difference which, with so few individuals, is not significant. There is no effect of selection. The effect of environmental influences upon reaction-time is indicated by the generally coincident up-and-down courses of the curves of the two strains of Line 762 and Line 766 (see figure 10, a and b). Line 768. Line 768 was the second of the two genetically distinct lines of D. longispina. It was taken into the laboratory from Pond IV in November 1913, but selection was not begun until December 1914 A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 71 in the fifty-fourth laboratory generation. Selections were continued for 21 months, 75 and 74 generations in the plus and minus strains respectively. The data will be found in tables 31 and 32 and in figure 10c. The data for the first longer period (December 1914-July 1915) consists of 29 and 28 broods from the two strains, there being 238 and 239 individuals. The mean reaction-times were 426 and 443 seconds. The difference is -17 ±19.5 seconds (table 31). There Table 31.— -Selection sum mary /or Line ? 68. Time period. Strain. +3 a o o in 9 ■a o 3 _o '■£ h O a oj O ■0 0 ■w a> oj — i GO ■a 0 o u Si o 6 00 » - 2 °s 6 "o o oj o Si g SB i O « c "3.2 3 -w 3 § •3 E £ C o 3 . OS 03 '" & i M g o 03 _>. "3 _> '■£ e3 . ex 1* o *-» c c ;s c .-. -t^» 03 - 3 O 3-0 > e c c — 03 . 03 ° £ a p '■2 o 03 ■§ a O o 03 3 E £ £ 03 £ o M 2 2 1 a _o o as 3 u 3 3 3 > •3 c C oi U a 3 E ■M a a o ^-» d '? a ■O ■a e a) -a a d 03 c 03 8 £ "o u o E 9 3 03 .Q O N i, E c 03 B £ d B V i - 0Q u £ B *^ Q S ci a 5 V c B to •3 "o h O E E B i a E i el £ a E a >. .Q -o •3 * ti §2 . E I- 0) to^ Dec. 21, 1914- July 31, 1915 ( Plus t Minus . . 54-83 54-82 29 2S 8.2 8.5 238 239 8 7 58 5/ 211 IS/ 730 772 426.0 443.0 331.2 299.7 14.5 13.1 -17.0 19.6 0.«7 Aug. 1, 1915- July 31, 1916 { Plus <■ Minus . . 84-125 83-124 39 SB 9.7 7.7 376 294 7 6 31 *4 111 144 657 647 315.7 328.0 242.1 230.8 8.4 9.1 -12. S 12.4 .39 Aug. 1, 1916- j Plus I Minus . . 126-128 3 9.7 29 0 3 143 845 350.0 268.5 33.6 + 151.6 43.0 3.52 Aug. 22, 1916 125-127 8 7.3 22 0 I 65 507 198.4 186.1 26.5 Table 32. — Same-day broods. Summary of data for Line 768. Time period. Strain. m O o t. XI ■M 0 6 Z M Ci 3 O >. •— o d . 23 '-' o » 2 S-S ■3 .2 >M O d 2 i o ■Is 03 >• B.£ •« til o a ° s 2 * No. of individuals fail- ing to reach an end of the tank. i o E £ 3 s i « E £ « i c£ - OS O £ 3 a M 00 OJ =3 E c \s •— 1 a H.2 e3 — D 0 3 ■ M 9 » 0 « h a S E Q Dec. 21, 1914-July 31, 1915 f Plus .... [ Minus . . f Plus [ Minus . . 17 17 4 4 180 169 50 39 2 6 1 0 52 37 3 2 212 112 106 118 808 827 603 615 454 4SS 374 336 + 16 + 33 Aug. 1, 1915-July 31, 1916 were a large number (17) of same-day broods for this period, for which the mean reaction-times were 454 and 438 seconds. The dif- ference is +16 seconds (table 32). For the year-period (August 1915-July 1916) there were 39 and 38 broods consisting of 376 and 294 individuals in the two strains. The mean reaction-times were 315.7 and 328 seconds. The difference is -12.3 ±12.4 seconds. There were only 4 same-day broods, for which the mean reaction-times were 374 and 336 seconds. The difference is +38 seconds. 72 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF •This experiment was continued during the most of another month, but the data consists of the records for only 3 broods from each strain. The means are 350 and 198.4 seconds. The difference (+151.6 seconds), while large, is based upon entirely too few individual reaction-times to be assigned significance. It is obvious that with Line 768 there was no effect of selection. The reproductive indices for this line have not been worked out, but the plus strain was apparently somewhat the more vigorous. That this difference in vigor has not influenced reaction-time, to any considerable extent at any rate, is evident from the fact that the same-day broods of the plus strain were on the whole less reactive than those of the minus strain. There is again, as with many other lines, an obvious effect of environmental conditions upon reaction-time. In spite of rather wide local fluctuations, the means for the two strains, on the whole, follow each other rather closely, as is shown in figure 10c. Reference to figure 10 (in which are given, separately, the re- action-time curves for the three selection lines of D. longispina and composite curves for the reaction-times of all the D. pulex selection lines) shows that there is a striking, though somewhat rough, paral- lelism between the reaction-time curves for the D. longispina and the D. pulex lines. This is an expression of similar influences of the same environmental factors upon the reactiveness to light of the two species. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 73 GENERAL INTRODUCTION FOR SIMOCEPHALUS EXSPINOSUS LINES. S. exspinosus in some regards seemed an unfavorable species for selection on the basis of its reaction to light. During the tests indi- viduals frequently attached to the surface film or to the sides of the experimental tank and rested there during the remainder of the test (see also page 25). Further, and to an even greater degree, the S. exspinosus young were unsatisfactory in that they so generally settled to the bottom of the tank and appeared non-reactive to light. In most broods there were several individuals which failed to reach either end of the tank during the 15 minutes of the experiment, while in some broods (particularly during the earlier course of the experi- ments) there was no response on the part of any individual of the brood. The reactiveness to light during the early course of the ex- periments was so slight that in many cases there were really no grounds for making a selection and there seemed little hope of a sufficient reactiveness to light to afford a basis for conducting an experiment in selection on this character. Several of the earlier S. exspinosus lines were discarded as un- profitable after a few generations of selection. Lines 740 and 757, while not promising at the start, were continued and subjected to selection for a time to see if it then seemed advisable to continue the selections. Even comparatively slightly reactive material might conceivably afford a basis for selection if there were enough reactive individuals to make a selection possible in a considerable percentage of cases. In addition to broods (particularly the earlier broods of these two lines) which showed absolutely no reaction to the light, there were other broods in which the only selection possible (in the plus strain) was from among individuals which had moved very slightly toward the light. In the minus strains the only choice in a vast majority of cases was an individual which showed no reaction to light. There were numbers of these in nearly every brood. Negatively reacting individuals were so rare with this species that it was seldom possible to make selections in the minus strains on the ground of a negative reaction to light1. But after a few generations it was con- sidered that the reactiveness of the strains of Lines 740 and 757 seemed sufficient to justify the continuation of these lines in the hope that there was sufficient reactiveness to test out the possibility of selection. The results justify the conclusion then reached, that after all there was sufficient basis for an experiment in selection. It is worthy of emphasis that the selections in the minus strains of lines of Simocephalus were rarely on the ground of a negative 1 However, as noted elsewhere (page 16), it is questionable if there is any real significance to be assigned to the negative reactions of the few individuals which went to the negative end of the experimental tank. 74 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF reaction to light; that the only selection possible in very many cases was from among individuals showing no reaction; and that in the remaining cases the selections in the minus strains were postively reacting individuals with the highest reaction-times. Lines 740 and 757 were subjected to selection from August and November 1912 to May 1917. Lines 794, 795, and 796 were used in selection from December 1914 to May 1917. All these lines of S. expinosus, except Line 757, originated from mothers obtained from Pond IV, the larger surface-water pond on the hill, a mile from the laboratory of the Station for Experimental Evolution. Table 33.— Selection summary for Line ? 94. Time period. Strain. d 0> co CO 9 «M 0 CO a o '■5 OS fa o> a o a •a a> CO o -^ T. -a c o u X o 6 00 2^ 3S — o "" m <~ 2 o o >5 -a o CO o s?3 i 43 CQ a ■^ m co C3 "3.2 3 8 -3 °° ;H C l— • — O M . a3 O £ — o «s ■*" i a do a '■+3 o si a u >t "3 > as . bX co a « "32 . > 1- o ■*-» i i .2 o X CO *J cJ *- 3 O 3tj > a To c a — • 03 °-§ . d O at 2 K 1 a .2 v> o aj 3 a a '3 a 03 M . Cj CO | e ■ c o o o3 fa a 3 a ■a 0) a 5 . 8 g 5'3 i a _o V> o OS 9 fa "as 3 3 > ■3 (3 0) s a a* a oS 9 a ■M o a o '•♦3 2 '> to ■o T3 fa as -0 a oj 43 CQ a oS 0) a o lo o C 3 CD 3 OS J3 O H a ss 9 a a a a O IB XI CO CO M > XI T) CO raal > "3 CO ^ §2 CO to .2 3-° Dec. 23, 1914- July 31, 1915 Aug. 1, 1915- July 31, 1916 Test series, July 1916. .. June 1, 1916- Aug. 31, 1916 Aug. 1, 1916- May 1. 1917 J Plus ( Minus . . j Plus < Minus . . j Plus I Minus . . j Plus 1 Minus . . j Plus ( Minus . . 1-27 1-26 28-63 27-61 62 61 59-67 69-64 64-91 62-90 27 26 33 32 3(3 36 7 6 24 23 13.3 15.0 U-7 27.5 2ff.S 15.6 9.7 15.1 /2.9 358 288 495 47* 989 965 109 68 363 297 13 8 10 *4 7 2 / 0 0 115 65 171 «4i 239 S£4 16 14 64 49 218 239 195 s;s 102 93 104 93 163 829 7SS 804 843 647 t954 720 692 625 539 529.4 4S^.« 483.8 689.1 395.9 395.2 314.4 409.6 309.9 373.8 301.0 £54.4 325.2 334.3 309.4 324.9 266.4 329.6 290.4 289.9 10.7 11.3 9.9 J0. 4 6.6 7.1 17.2 29.2 10.3 J7.S +77.6 15.6 4.97 -105.3 + .7 /4s 9.7 7.36 .07 -95.1 33.9 2. SO -63.9 16.3 4.JS Table 34.- -Same-day broods. Summary of data for Line 7 94- Time period. Strain. 03 •a 0 0 t. Xl I— 0 6 CO p, H a 3 0 >. "o 6 Z Eg ^■8 to "3 3 "2 '> ■3 a 0 6 2 1 _g CO as CO fa _>. "3 > oS . be co o3 . > 1- 0 M ■ J-a S3 -4-9 •" CO co XI 73 _. ■e x) .5 « -0 <" 2 0 '" C8 . 03 O D 1 a .2 '■•3 V cd 0) a 3 a a a CO & CO fa - oi H > ■" ■ a "3 CO ed CO fa a 3 a cd a CO M . 03 CO s a 1 a .2 0 OS CO fa "es 3 -0 •-» -3 ca 1 03 a oj fa a 03 00 a ■M O a ys 2 > 00 13 ■0 fa OS T3 C 03 «S CQ a 03 00 a o fa o fa fa CO _00 3 CO X o fa f-4 H O a . cs « a "a 3 CO 00 CO * a ■•-> ca ■a a S3 0 2 CO CO fa ~ IJ 3a CD CO fl 3 fa CO a ■M o fa o CO 3 as X o ■ SB X o fa a >> X •B 9 T3 3 "3 a fa §2 CO b fa 0> 0) ■a .8 a* Dec. 23, 1914- July 31, 1915 Aug. 1, 1915- July 31, 1916 Aug. 1, 1916- May 1, 1917 j Plus ( Minus . . ( Plus • Minus . . ( Plus l Minus . . 7 7 5 5 2 2 13.1 16.2 13.8 12.0 ;3.o 92 81 81 69 24 26 1 2 0 4 0 0 22 8 28 ^3 4 4 155 173 259 105 315 876 900 900 645 t?4<5 475 359 463 490 323 457 276.95 225.60 19.48 16.90 + 116 25.78 4.49 -27 270.21 248.69 37.20 32.90 -134 49.66 2.C9 Line 794. The selection data for Line 794 are given in tables 33 and 34 and figure 11. This line and Lines 795 and 796 originated from three mothers collected December 11, 1914. Selection was begun with the first A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 75 broods of young produced in the laboratory and continued for 29 months, 91 generations in the plus strain and 90 generations in the minus strain. For the first longer period (December 1914-July 1915) of the experiment the means for the plus and minus strains (358 and 288 individuals) were, respectively, 529.4 and 451.8 seconds (table 33). The difference (+77.6 ±15.6 seconds) was 4.97 times the probable error. For the first single month of selection (December 1914) the plus strain was more reactive by 40 seconds and again in June 1915 the plus strain was the more reactive strain, this time by a large margin, 274 seconds; but for the other 6 months of the first longer period the minus was more reactive by differences ranging from 88 to 219 seconds. For the same-day broods (table 34) the means were 475 and 359 seconds, the plus strain having a higher mean by 116 ± 25.78 seconds. Of the 7 same-day broods for this period, 5 occurred in succession in January and February 1915, almost im- mediately after the beginning of the experiment. The differences were +175, +207, +193, +140, and +152 seconds. Data for a pair of same-day broods occurring just before these five are incomplete, but the minus brood was the more reactive by at least 196 seconds, while the pair of broods just preceding those last mentioned were likewise same-day broods with the plus the more reactive by a small margin (27 seconds). Thus there were in effect 7 successive same-day broods, in all of which the minus brood was considerably the more reactive. These differences are so large and so persistent as to indi- cate for this early and limited period (January-February 1915) a real difference in reaction-time, with the minus strain the more reactive. In the last 2 months of this longer period (to August 1915) the minus strain had much the larger reaction-time, and this differ- ence was greatly increased in the next two-month period and con- tinued very large for another two-month period.1 The second longer period (the year August 1915-July 1916) gave averages of 483.8 and 589.1 seconds. The difference was — 105.3 ±14.3 seconds, or 7.36 times the probable error. For the same period the 5 same-day broods had a difference of —27 seconds. This year's data, taken as a whole, might at first thought be con- sidered suggestive of an effect of selection; but the great irregularities of the curves, the small difference between same-day-brood means, and the large differences in the opposite direction for the preceding year do not favor such an interpretation. A test series conducted during July 1916, consisting of nearly 1,000 individuals of each strain, gave means differing by only +0.7 ±9.7 seconds. This test 1 The very great divergence in the two reaction-time curves, the minus strain being the less reactive of the two, for the six-month period June to November 1915 is no more easily accounted for than the earlier six-month period, during which the plus strain was markedly the less reactive. 76 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF series shows effectively that there was up to July 1916 no certain basis for assuming an effect of selection within this line. During the last longer period (August 1916-May 1917) of selection with Line 794 the means were 309.9 and 373.8 seconds. The difference (—63. 9 ±15. 3 seconds) was 4.18 times its probable error. The 2 same-day broods gave means differing by —134 ±49.66 seconds. As for the preceding year, the means are suggestive of an effect of selection, but the irregular course of the curves (figure lie), together with the result of the test series conducted in July 1916 (table 33) and the much higher reaction-time for the plus strain during 6 months of the experiment, make this interpretation ques- tionable. It is noteworthy, however, that in spite of considerable irregularities in the curves, the curve for the minus strain is appreci- ably lower than that for the plus strain in only one of the 9 two- month periods after the first 12 months of the experiment. After this early period all the data except the test-series data indicate that the minus strain was on the whole the less reactive throughout the experiment. Since the mothers from which the two strains of Line 794 originated were sisters from the same brood, it is hard to understand to what the difference in reactiveness (the minus strain being markedly the more reactive) during the period of the experiment (June- November 1915) can have been due. It is possible to think of it as a mutation in the minus strain, the effect of which was later eliminated by selection or by a second mutation in the same strain in the direction of less reactiveness to light; but these are mere sur- mises for which there is no real evidence and the differences them- selves are not pronounced and certain enough to be considered as of great significance. It is probable, however, that the rather wide differences in reactiveness in the minus strain of this line at different periods of the experiment are due to non-genetic factors, such as produced similar effects in Lines 695 and 740 (see figures 2c and 15) and elsewhere. Nevertheless, the data leave room for the suggestion that selection was possibly responsible for the elimination of the greater reactiveness on the part of the minus strain, however it may have occurred, and a development of a relatively greater re- activeness on the part of the plus strain. Figure 11a indicates graphically the general reproductive levels for the two strains during the different two-month periods. There is no obvious relation between reproductive vigor and mean reaction- time unless the generally lower reproductive vigor of the minus strain be assumed to account for the generally higher reaction-time of the minus as compared with the plus strain; but with Line 795 (see figure 12b) the plus strain in general showed an even greater superiority in vigor, yet it was much less reactive than the minus A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 77 strain of the same line. Examined in detail, the data for reproductive vigor and reaction-time do not appear to be related.1 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 .50 00 -I ,ViI i I! 3 6 12-1 4-5 8-9 12-1 4-5 8-9 12-1 4 1915 1916 1917 i B « • i i i "TT. ? ? 1 i > r^ -1 1.00 .75 .50 .25 00 .25 .50 750 600 450 300 150 12-1 4-5 8-9 1915 12-1 4-5 8-9 1916 12-1 4 1917 Figure 11. — Line 794. A. Reproductive indices, actual values. B. Reproductive indices, superiority. C. Reaction-time curves. Line 795. Line 795 is a sister line of Lines 794 and 796 and was subjected to selection for a like period covering 94 generations for the plus and 95 generations for the minus strain. The data will be. found in tables 35 and 36 and in figure 12. 1 For example, during the first 6 months the plus strain of Line 794 was persistently the more vigorous and generally the less reactive. The 7 high points in figure 11a showing high reproductive indices (above 1.75) for the plus strain correspond 4 times with periods of greater reactiveness in the same strain, and 3 times with periods of less reactiveness; 5 similar high points of reproductive indices for the minus strain correspond with 1 period of relatively greater re- activeness in the minus strain and with 4 points of lesser reactiveness. The two-month periods of relatively low reproductive indices for the two strains likewise fail to correspond with periods of lesser reactiveness to light. 78 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF Casual examination seems to reveal at once the fact that there is no effect of selection, and this is probably correct, but on careful analysis it is not altogether certain that an effect of selection is entirely lacking. The plus strain is generally the less reactive, but the curve for the minus strain is extremely fluctuating. For the first longer period (8 months) the mean for the plus strain was 703.3 seconds, for the minus strain 571.4 seconds (table Table 35. — Selection summary for Line 795. 03 i 43 i a S 1 a 1 0 i a a i > _> 43 03 bfi co a 2 C C ■~ 03 Eh 43 cd ^ .2 o3 V .2 o 09 u o Q oj 9 u 03 3 E a 03 a 03 m E a CD k CD ta X o 14 a >> Time period. Strain. D 00 9 CO a .2 •a CD CD CD 43 ■3 C o 1* XI to . MM 0 o Z t3 O CD O S s .£;■» -3 "> d m ■H a «*« — o j* . cd ° a — a *" X J *» 3 O > e a a ■■" cd £ a a 'a a a a J '3 03 a o "os 3 "2 '? t3 a a _o 43 .2 CO a **. o h O u 9 CD a o CI is 43 CO CO © a O 43 •a ■M o kt o u u CD <» X) T3 a) 13 "> -3 oj "S cd X o^ ° o w . M . 03 03 o) a h ° X 03 0J u a a O 6 Z 03 "" 1' I'"3 . cd O cu 2 u 1= cd £ °3 a CD ki a 03 43 CO X O u 3" X O M 5-° Dec. 24, 1914- j Plus i Minus . . j Plus ( Minus , . ( Plus t Minus . . ( Plus t Minus . . ( Plus ( Minus . . 1-27 27 10.8 292 14 164 425 900 703.3 254.4 10.0 + 131.9 15.7 8.40 July 31, 1915 Aug. 1, 1915- 1-27 28-65 SJ7 37 10.4 15.7 .250 580 4 18 703 301 377 325 375 842 571.4 625.0 299.1 308.5 12.1 8.6 +94.3 14.2 6.64 July 31, 1916 Test 8 e r i e s , 28-64 60 SB 22 10.7 63.5 S7t? 1397 10 12 733 334 230 798 880 630.7 615.4 323.7 330.9 77.2 6.0 +23.8 8.9 2.67 June 1916. . . Mav 1, 1916- 60 57-65 22 8 60.8 16.1 7333 129 27 7 683 60 733 181 333 750 591.6 594.7 356.1 316.7 6.6 18.8 + 146.6 31.6 4.63 July 31, 1916 Aug. 1, 1916- May 1, 1917 66-64 66-94 65-96 8 24 20 10.3 14.8 14-4 82 356 2<97 0 0 •4 29 115 92 257 133 204 776 815 735 443.7 457.2 502.0 341.7 326.4 330.7 25.5 11.7 73.7 -44-3 17.6 2.65 Table 36 -Same-day broods. Summary of data for Line 795. u CD • a o 43 ■ a 1 ■ a a u 0 CD 0. o o 0 03 .n a a a 43 O C9 43 CD CD a CO a . a CD 0 m a a o >> 43 a 03 CD .-. 43 CO 43 03 CD (-■ a OJ u a 03 CD ■4 MM O a 0 a 03 0 a CO 2 cd a a 43 0) s X •0 Time period. Strain. CO ■3 o o X ■M o 6 Z CD . a a "2 a > 43 03 . M co a S c3 ■— 3 O 2-0 > a "B a a 3 8 'a a CD 3 a C3 a CD 3 ■a *> -3 _a '43 .2 '> V •a "3 h O h CD CD

■3 B I W-T3 . 03 O CD ■z " M . s . 03 X CD 03 X CD k, 0 d 2 o o 6 I1 cj CD »" a cd a 03 CD bi - a a a cd S 2 a CO 43 co 03 X O G CM CO X O H k, CD CD Dec. 24, 1914- j Plus 12 11.6 139 8 70 363 900 661 277.77 15.89 + 63 23.89 2.63 July 31, 1915 ' Minus . . 19 rr> 7 128 3 67 35^ 373 698 299.17 77.34 Aug. 1, 1915- ( Plus 12 13.5 162 3 88 334 725 617 323.84 17.16 + 138 26.74 5.16 July 31, 1916 < Minus . . 18 10 9. 723 4 45 9.78 818 479 337.18 20.57 Aug. 1, 1916- May 1, 1917 j Plus t Minus . . 5 6 12.6 74-6 63 73 0 2 9 SO 117 453 714 500 307 671 263.21 313.97 22.37 24.78 -334 33.38 70.90 35). The difference was +131.9 ±15.7 seconds, or 8.4 times the probable error. The 12 same-day broods for this period likewise gave a mean for the plus strain in excess of the minus strain (table 36). The difference was +63 ±23.89 seconds, 2.63 times the probable error. For the second longer period (August 1915 — July 1916) of the data for this line the means were 625.0 and 530.7 seconds for the plus and minus strains. The difference was +94.3 ±14.2 seconds. This difference was 6.64 times the probable error. Twelve same- A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 79 day broods averaged 817 and 479 seconds, the difference being + 138 ±26.74 seconds. A test series conducted in June 1916, and consisting of more than 1,300 individuals of each strain, gave a plus mean of 615.4 seconds and a minus mean of 591.6 seconds. The difference (+23.8 ±8.9 seconds) was 2.67 times the probable error. Thus the data for this line to August 1916 indicates a signifi- 700 1.50 100 .50 00 A JT i J I- 12-1 4-5 8-9 12-1 4-5 8-9 12-1 1915 i9IG 4 1917 B - t..t! i i > T * — • • i i i I _i < i i. 100 .75 .50 .25 00 .25 .50 7 50 600 •450 - 300 150 12-1 4-5 8-9 12-1 4-5 8-9 1915 1916 12-1 4 1917 - Figure 12. — Line 795. A. Reproductive indices, actual values. B. Reproductive indices, superiority. C. Reaction-time curves. cantly lower reactiveness on the part of the plus strain, a result op- posite that of a selective effect. For the following and final 9 months of selection with this line the plus strain averaged the more reactive; the means were 457.2 and 502 seconds, and the difference was —44.8 ±17.6 seconds, or 2.55 times the probable error. The 5 same-day broods gave as means 307 and 671 seconds. The minus same-day mean was more than double that for the plus strain, the difference being —364 ± 33.38 seconds, 10.9 times the probable error. Of these 5 same-day broods, 80 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF 4 occurred in succession in April 1917 and constituted the final data for this line. The writer believes that considerable stress may be safely placed upon the same-day-brood data and is inclined to think that at the close of the experiment with Line 795 the plus strain was actually and significantly the more reactive. It is quite possible to suppose that the considerably higher reaction-time of the plus strain during the early part of this experi- ment (whatever may have been the cause and meaning) was gradually reduced by selection and that at the close of the experiment the plus strain was actually the more reactive, due to the influence of selec- tion. But in the absence of a test series at the close of the experiment, and without knowledge as to what the relative reaction-time means for the two strains would have been in later generations, with or without further selection, the supposition is not worth consideration. It is not at all improbable, however, that the differences in different parts of the curves for the two strains represent merely low and high points in the reactiveness of the two strains due* to non- genetic influences, the plus strain being relatively slightly reactive and the minus strain unusually reactive during the early period, while the reverse was true during the later part of the experiment. Such fluctuations in the reactiveness of the two strains of the same line for considerable periods are seen in several cases, notably in Line 695 (figure 2c) and Line 740 (figure 15). In this line from June-July 1915 to April-May 1916 there was a general rise in the reproductive index for the plus strain and a general fall in the reproductive index for the minus strain. The result was a wide divergence in reproductive indices for the two strains culminating in April-May 1916, when the reproductive index for the plus strain was nearly twice that for the minus strain (figure 12a). This may be thought a result of selection acting in a cumulative way upon the vigor of the 2 strains, but there was no relaxation in or change in the method of selection, and yet the minus strain later reached as high a point in reproductive index as it had attained at any earlier time (though in general it remained lower than the plus strain). While the reproductive indices indicate (figure 12 a) that the plus strain was in general very much the more vigorous of the two strains, one fails to find (as always) any direct relation between reproductive index and reaction-time. The generally much higher reproductive index for the plus strain, associated as it is during most of the experi- ment with a considerably higher reaction-time mean for this strain, in itself serves as a general denial of an association in this line between vigor and reactiveness to light. Line 796. This was a sister line to Lines 794 and 795. Selection was begun at the same time and continued for the same period as with those A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 81 lines (29 months), representing 95 generations in the plus and 91 generations in the minus strain. The data are given in tables 37 and 38 and figure 13. The courses of the reaction-time curves are extremely irregular, although in a general way the curves follow each other in a manner to suggest environmental influence upon reaction-time. It is obvious that there was no effect of selection. Table 37. — Selection summary for Line 796. Time period. Strain. a a a CO o ~0 IM O CO CI _o +3 03 E 3 a CD o -6 o 43 CO a) *3 CO —s o o u X "o 6 2 m •>■£ T3 -*-> <~ ° 0 0 Is -a 0 0 0 cj X 1 CO .£ 0 -3 K z.s 0 M . 03 0 E — c c3 •" I"8 1 a M 8 oj 3 E j>> "3 o3 . bi) CO a i "S3 . > 0 a a M^' C B — 03 .2 a X CO *J 03 »*. 3 O 2 -a > a 73 e a — cj . o3 O CD 2 C 1 a 0 d 3 a J a a «* . o3 en 1 a 0 ♦^ Q 03 CD E s 3 a •3 a a s ^ 1 a 0 '•3 0 3 3 IS 13 3 '? ■3 a a a! S.g a* 3 a 0 a 0 os '> <1> -3 -0 e si •0 a 03 43 w a S3 B a O U O t O > XI 0 g t 5 U t3 «> Dec. 25, 1914- July 31, 1915 Aug. 1, 1915- July 31, 1916 Aug. 1, 1916- May 1, 1917 Test series, Aug. 1916... July 1, 1916- Sept. 30, 1916 ( Plus I Minus . . ( Plus <■ Minus . . J Plus I Minus . . f Plus 1 Minus . . j Plus < Minus . . 1-28 1-27 29-66 28-61 67-95 68-90 68 64 65-71 61-68 28 27 38 33 L'L' 80 20 .Ji> 7 7 12.3 13.0 15.9 S.O 13.7 9.6 33.1 32.2 16.6 343 Sol 604 2e?5 302 J. 92 662 643 116 39 4 75 13 2 5 ; 15 8 1 3 117 U7 301 176 98 49 379 362 76 25 244 259 364 454 220 J« 256 189 346 243 876 > O 6 «> . £ g g 2 CD S3 3 -3 a ■M O 6 ■ a M a 0 03 V 14 _> 03 . 50 CO si °^ 1* 0 *> 00 ■ I-a ^2 oJ ^ 0) en X9 gr L° :>^ -a • 3 0 w 0 . S3 O CJ 2 " ■ a 0 03 3 14 a 3 a 'a a CD " . Cfl rt) CD B <* 1 d 0 O a u a 3 a '3 03 a CD s • 03 CD g.§ 1 a 0 ■^ CD C3 SD E "a 3 _a a cj g a s'5 a 1 CD a ■M O a 0 •3 03 '? CD T3 -0 E 03 •a a 09 43 00 a* 03 CJ a 0 u 0 t CD CD 3 OS XI O b £ 0 a . sa s| CD °0 f 01 «-> a x a °^ a 5 0 OS t " to = sj CD a E CD O fa O E E O CD 3 OS X 0 E 1 OS X 0 E a h X ■0 a> -a > aS CD C 1- CD CD ID J: Dec. 25, 1914- July 31, 1915 Aug. 1, 1915- July 31, 1916 Aug. 1, 1916- May 1, 1917 ( Plus < Minus . . ( Plus I Minus . . ( Plus t Minus . . 7 7 10 10 4 4 8.4 7.4 13.9 3.5 17.0 75.3 59 52 139 85 68 63 2 5 1 7 2 3 28 J4 78 52 48 /9 329 794 382 492 345 Jt?/ 900 797 900 Si54 900 810 634 623 674 680 723 60S 283.10 281 .80 176.68 2.98.67 291.84 303.64 24.86 08.38 10.11 21.84 23.87 26.79 + 111 36.23 3.06 +220 24.07 35.14 0.24 6.26 The mean reaction-times for the first longer period (8 months) of the experiment were 555.5 and 604.8 seconds, the plus strain being the more reactive by a margin of 49.3 ±14.9 seconds, a differ- ence 3.31 times the probable error (table 37). The 7 same-day broods for this period gave averages indicating greater reactiveness for the minus strain by a difference of +111 ±36.23 seconds, more than double the difference obtained from the entire data for this period and in the reverse direction (table 38). 82 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF For the second longer period the reaction-time means were 619.1 and 697.5 seconds. The difference was —78.4 ±14.7 seconds, 5.33 times the probable error. The 10 same-day broods gave averages differing by only —6 ±24.07 seconds. The data for the last longer period (August 1916 to the end of the selection experiment in April 1917) gave as means 449.4 and 2.00 1.50 1.00 .50 i I T J 750 - 600 450 - 300- 150 - Figure 13. — Line 796. A. Reproductive indices, actual values. B. Reproductive indices, superiority. C. Reaction-time curves. (The asterisk indicates a point established from insufficient data, only one brood.) 393.7 seconds. The minus strain was the more reactive by 55.7 ±19.1 seconds, 2.92 times the probable error. The same-day-brood means (only 4 broods of each strain) differed by 220 seconds, the minus strain being the more reactive. A test series conducted during August 1916 consisted of 662 and 643 individuals in the two strains. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 83 The means were 675.6 and 653.7 seconds. The difference was +21.9 ±11.0 seconds, 1.99 times the probable error. Hence, for the first 2 longer periods the means for the entire data gave higher reaction-times for the minus than for the plus strain. These differences (-49.3 and -78.4 seconds) were 3.31 and 5.33 times their probable errors, but the lack of confirmation of these differences from the same-day-brood data at once throws doubt upon a real significance for these differences; while for the final long period of the experiment with Line 796, the test series, the selection data as a whole, and the same-day-brood data confirm each other in indicating a greater reactiveness on the part of the minus strain. The data for this line would seem to present these points of interest: a lack of selective effect, an effect of environmental in- fluences upon reaction-time as indicated by the courses of the curves, they following each other in a general way, and the lack of any marked evidence of a relation between vigor and reaction-time in a case in which the two strains differed extremely in vigor. This last point may be worthy of a little further statement. The plus strain was very much the more vigorous during most of the experiment, yet the differences in mean reaction- time were not such as to indicate, everything considered, a significantly higher reaction-time for the minus strain than for the plus strain. Indeed, the same-day-brood data quite fail to confirm any significant dif- ference in reaction-time between the two strains for any part of the experiment. During the 3 two-month periods during which the differ- ence in mean reproductive indices were greatest (figure 13b), the minus strain was less reactive, but for 2 of the 3 other periods (in which the inferiority in reproductive index for the minus strain was almost as great) the minus strain was actually the more reactive. There were altogether 9 periods of very low reproductive indices (about 1.00 or lower) for the minus strain, and these were periods during which the plus strain, with two exceptions, ran fairly high in vigor (reproductive index over 1.50), and hence the difference in vigor was marked; yet the minus strain, far from being markedly less reactive, was during 4 of these periods actually the more reactive. It was the less re- active, however, during the other 5 periods and in 3 cases the differ- ences were large. Though in general the reproductive index for the minus strain of this line remained lower than that for the plus strain, it regained a high level (1.7) soon after this divergence in reproductive indices was most marked. Thus, while in both Lines 795 and 796 there was an apparent cumulative effect of selection upon the vigor of the minus strain, in both cases the effect was lost and the minus strain later attained relatively high reproductive indices, although the method and pro- cedure of selection were in no wise modified. 84 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF Line 740. Line 740 was the first line of S. exspinosas subjected to selection. It was obtained in August 1912, from Pond IV, in which S. exspinosus occurs the year round. Selection was begun at once and continued for 181 and 184 generations, for a period of more than 56 months, Table 39.— Selection summary for Line 740. Time period. Strain. 49 a ■*-> 0 0 »- XI u— C 6 .3 d . ■■32 .2 0 CQ . <— 0 0 Z T3 0 4) O 03 -O ei hi g 0J 3* 0Q a) CO O "3.2 3 -u ■a ° .x a> >.~u -3 <° 3 b£ •" a o.a: . 03 0 S _ c 03 '" 1 a M a 03 O M j*. *-*3 03 . -f CO 3 03 0 3 ^2 1- 0 <»a M-M a B — 03 « OJ ^^ co — 3 O > a a a •- c3 *SJ3 w 0 . 03 O OJ 1 a 0 0 eJ a 3 ~ S 0 2 g 1 a v» efl 9 M S 3 a 03 a t£ , 03 cp « a 1 a 0 '•+3 0 03 9 u "3 3 •a •p •3 a a 0 s s §'5 a as 9 a ■M O 3 O 33 03 0 ■a ■a (. 03 T3 a 03 43 CQ a 03 9 a O N O 0 0 3 09 0 1 to I. 3 9 a 3 0 3 & -4-3 O CO £i ® 0 s 0 *^ 0 - B.2 (a i 5s d 0 a 0 s H ■0 MM O hi O H hi 3 0 d O Ph ■ d .a 0 hi a >, XI 0 ■a It s 8 to J2 Aug. 27, 1912- July 31, 1913 Aug. 1, 1913- July 31, 1914 Test series, Apr. 1914... Mar. 1914- May 1914. .. Aug. 1, 1914- July 31, 1915 Aug. 1, 1915- July 31, 1916 Test series, Mar. 1916.. Feb. 1916- Apr. 1916... Test series, June 1916. .. May 1916- July 31, 1916 Aug. 1, 1916- May 1, 1917 Test series, Apr. 1917... Mar. 19 17- May 1, 1917 ( Plus I Minus . . I Plus 1 Minus . . ( Plus I Minus . . ( Plus .... 1 Minus . . j Plus • Minus . . j Plus I Minus . . ( Plus ( Minus . . j Plus t Minus . . ( Plus t Minus . . ( Plus t Minus . . ( Plus ( Minus . . J Plus 1 Minus . . j Plus I Minus . . 1-34 1-34 35-76 35-79 65 66 61-68 62-71 77-118 79-119 119-153 120-155 142 143 139-146 140-147 151 152 147-153 148-154 154-181 165-184 179 181 175-181 178-184 37 36 40 45 23 23 8 to 42 40 35 35 34 34 8 8 :>,2 SS 6 6 26 84 26 S6 6 7 11.5 9.9 10.6 /0.7 28.4 26.7 11.0 /2.6 10.8 14.3 15.3 31.7 S£.0 17.9 17.5 38.5 14.3 12.0 13.5 29.1 29.7 12.7 13.6 427 357 424 482 653 614 88 126 452 ■454 471 519 1078 1089 143 J 40 1231 86 Ml 252 756 756 76 95 0 0 5 2 1 1 0 16 -4 2 5 7 2 0 4 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 0 0 291 259 184 275 358 391 36 56 244 208 227 262 628 523 82 Si 199 45 75 27 33 38 31 8 1 384 399 359 416 173 243 347 269 305 351 303 290 202 178 359 343 113 127 234 4/3 113 253 79 1 06 102 59 872 884 881 370 900 900 870 334 886 339 828 820 900 372 900 831 817 370 725 339 631 669 716 673 560 421 735.2 757.0 597.1 656.9 666.4 711.9 569.2 596.3 642.5 607.7 574.6 600.0 641.6 677.9 653.8 64J-3 420.2 525.7 574.7 7/0.4 311.1 395.8 314.5 329.8 262.0 165.7 266.0 244-7 298.7 302.4 294.6 278.3 8.7 8.7 9.8 9.3 7.8 7.6 -21.8 12.3 1.77 -59.8 13.5 4.43 -46.5 10.9 4-17 -27.1 +34.8 307.6 306.0 335.6 326.9 324.6 331.7 9.8 9.7 10.4 9.7 6.7 6.8 13.8 2.52 -25.4 + 63.7 14-^ 9.5 i.79 6.71 + 12.0 318.8 468.6 6.1 3.3 -105.6 10. S /0.«4 -135.7 243.0 334-0 256.3 267.0 248.8 124.6 10.3 12.5 6.3 6.6 19.2 8.6 -84-7 16.2 6.23 -15.3 + 96.3 9.1 21.1 1.68 4.56 Table 40.- -Same-day broods. Summary of data for Line 71fi. Time period. Strain. S C 0 h. X c 0 hi 3 a M 3 3 O >. ■M O hi V XI a 3 a i> . SfT3 "3 3 •d '> -3 .S "o 6 Z 1 a w '5 0 03 V hi > 03 . CX T. 3 03 H 3 0 ^> M^ a '•£ 0J t3 a a •- 03 o-a w c . (3 O w 1 a 0 '■♦3 0 d 4> hi a 3 a 'a a M . 03 cj u a 1 = • a _o '■^ 0 d 9 hi a 3 a •a d a « . 03 oj M t a _o *^ 0 d 9 hi "d 3 'P a a 0 s a s'5 a d 9 a ■M O a 0 '•+3 1 TJ 13 hi d ■a a d CO a d a ■M O hi O hi hi a 0 3 d XI O hi Ph hi 0 00 a . d » c a a '3 In 3 CD ■w a -a a 0J — 1 a a 0 d ij 0 0 a V hi V to •3 IM O hi O hi hi 9 co 3 d X) O h, A 1 d XI 0 hi a >, xt •a ■0 V '■& 1 5 8 to J2 5-12 Aug. 1, 1912- July 31, 1913 Aug. 1, 1913- July 31, 1914 Aug. 1, 1914- July 31, 1915 Aug. 1, 1915- July 31, 1916 Aug. 1, 1916- May 1, 1917 ( Plus • Minus . . j Plus ' Minus . . ( Plus • Minus . . ( Plus < Minus . . j Plus t Minus . . 6 6 9 0 3 3 14 14 4 4 10.0 3.2 10.8 12.3 10.0 15.4 /S.i 10.5 10.6 60 49 97 112 37 SO 216 226 42 42 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 29 46 64 31 21 99 133 6 2 386 332 498 422 359 529 266 324 111 75 900 900 874 739 900 900 782 soe 818 736 713 682 607 632 834 815 558 340 358 221 +31 298.53 293.38 20.44 18.70 -25 + 19 31.18 0.30 335.22 335.71 262.16 196.36 15.38 15.06 27.29 20.33 -82 + 137 21.63 34.03 3.30 4.02 A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 85 until the experiment was completed. Both strains are still in our laboratory.1 The data are summarized in tables 39 and 40 and figures 14 and 15. The first longer period of the experiment, approximately 11 months, contains the data for 37 and 36 broods of the two strains. The mean reaction-times (427 and 357 individuals) are 735.2 and 757 seconds (table 39). The difference (-21.8±12.3 seconds) was 1.77 times the probable error. There were 6 same-day broods for this period (table 40) for which the mean reaction-times were 713 and 682 seconds, the difference being +31 seconds. For the second year-period of selection with Line 740, the mean reaction-times (424 and 482 individuals) were 597.1 and 656.9 seconds. The difference was -59.8 ±13.5 seconds. This difference was 4.43 times the statistical probable error. The 9 same-day broods for this period gave as mean reaction-times 607 and 632 seconds, the difference being -25 ±31.18 seconds. A test series was conducted in April 1914. There were 653 individuals of the plus strain and 614 of the minus strain. The mean reaction-times were 666.4 and 711.9 seconds. The difference was -45.5 ±10.9 seconds, or 4.17 times the probable error. There is a suggestion of an effect of selection for this year-period in that the data as a whole, the data for the same-day broods, and the test- series data all show higher reaction-times for the minus strain. But in view of the later data this evidence is overruled. For the next year-period (August 1914-July 1915) the mean reaction-times (452 and 454 individuals) were 642.5 and 607.7. The difference (+34.8 ±13.8 seconds) is 2.52 times the probable error. Hence the difference is of statistical interest, but is opposed to an effect of selection. There were only 3 same-day broods for this year- period for which the mean reaction-times were 834 and 815 seconds. The difference was +19 seconds. For the year-period (August 1915-July 1916) the mean reaction- times (471 and 519 individuals) were 574.6 and 600.0 seconds. The difference (—25.4 ±14. 2 seconds) is only 1.79 times the probable error. There were 14 same-day broods for this period, for which the mean reaction-times were 558 and 640 seconds. The difference was -82 ±21.53 seconds. A test series was conducted during March 1916 and contained 1.078 individuals in the plus strain and 1,089 in the minus strain. The mean reaction-times were 641.6 and 577.9 seconds. The differ- ence (+63.7 ±9.5 seconds) "is 6.71 times the probable error. This test series was conducted with great care, and the fact that the plus strain was the less reactive of the two by a margin of statistical significance largely counterbalances the small difference in the 1 It was in one of the substrains of this line (740 - Special B) that the sex-intergrades were first discovered. 86 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF opposite direction for the selection data as a whole and the larger difference in the opposite direction for the same-day-brood data for this year. Another test series was conducted during this period, during June 1916; it contained 1,231 individuals in the plus strain and 1,282 in the minus strain. The mean reaction-times were 420.2 and 525.7 seconds. The difference ( — 105.5 ±10.3 seconds) is 10.24 times the probable error. The result of this test series, conducted only 3 months later than the earlier one, is quite contradictory to the result of the former. The results of these test series are somewhat puzzling, but table 39, giving the selection summary, shows that for the three-month period February- April 1916 (including the month in which the earlier test series was made and that just preceding and just succeed- ing) the mean reaction-time was much higher for the plus strain. The similar period of 3 months, May-July 1916, during which the June test series was conducted, shows a mean reaction-time in the minus strain 135.7 seconds greater than that for the plus strain. One sees, in these test series and the selection data for the contingent periods, that the relative reactiveness had changed here in a comparatively short time. Reference to the curve, figure 15, shows that for the two-month period, February-March 1916, the two curves met, but for the later two-month periods the minus strain for a considerable time was much less reactive than the plus strain. For the final longer period of the experiment with Line 740 (August 1916 to the close of the experiment, May 1, 1917) the mean reaction-times were 311.1 seconds and 395.8 seconds for the two strains. The difference (— 84. 7 ±16.2 seconds) was 5.23 times the probable error. There were only 4 same-day broods, for which the mean reaction- times were 358 and 221 seconds, the difference being + 137 ±34.03 seconds. Here the number of same-day broods was too small to be given serious consideration, but it is interesting to note that with these same-day broods the plus strain was so much less reactive than the minus, in opposition to the difference shown by the data as a whole for this period. Two of these 4 same-day broods, however, occurred during the final 3 months of the experi- ment, when the data as a whole showed that the minus strain was temporarily the more reactive. Reference to the curves of the mean reaction-times (figure 15) shows that for 10 months (from April 1916 to January 1917, inclusive) the minus strain was the less reactive and that the margin of differ- ence increased until in the December 1916 and January 1917 periods the reaction-time for the minus strain was more than double that for the plus strain. The data for a portion of this ten-month period was not very satisfactory. We were troubled with poor food con- ditions, and, at times, when the stock was not well nourished, the selections were not made by tests, but individuals were chosen at A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 87 random. Because of this fact, the data for 4 months (October 1916- Jamiary 1917) are not very complete and the differences for those 2 two-month periods are not to be credited to the same extent as the differences for the remainder of the experiment. Reference to tables 48 and 49 (columns 5 and 6) and figure 15 and 18b shows that this consistent divergence in reactiveness be- 2.00 1.50 1.00 50 00 Kil I 1 2 lls I I % - ~t 9 8-9 12-1 1912 4-5 8-9 1913 12-1 4-5 8-9 1914 12-1 4-5 8-9 1915 12-1 4-5 8-9 1916 12-1 4 1917 .75 .50 .25 00 .25 .50 .75 • 1 1 1 t B • 4 > < i - 6 6 1 4H4 < 6 > i 6 1 * ° 4 < c 1 1 1 Figure 14. — Line 740. A. Reproductive indices, actual values. B. Reproductive indices, superiority. 900 750 600 450 300 150 Figure 15. — Line 740. Reaction-time curves with reaction-time curves for Lino 757 superimposed. 88 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF tween the two strains of Line 740 for the period April 1916-January 1917 is due to exceptionally high means for the minus strain during the period April-September and to exceptionally low means in the plus strain from October to the following January, both relative to the means for corresponding two-month periods for the other S. exspinosus strains (Lines 794, 795, and 796). The following of one of these two exceptional reaction- time periods just upon the other produces the long period of divergence which at first sight seems very suggestive of an effect of selection. Since it is seen in this case that neither the plus nor the minus strain of Line 740 is consistently different from the composite curve for the other plus and minus strain of lines of S. exspinosus throughout this ten-month period, it seems pretty evident that genetic change is not responsible for this divergence. It is believed that the explanation lies in the unavoid- able differential treatment of the two strains of the same line (see pages 140-142). A final test series was conducted in April 1917. There were 756 individuals of each strain. The mean reaction-times were 314.5 seconds and 329.8 seconds. The difference ( — 15. 3 ±9.1 seconds) was only 1.68 times the probable error. For the contingent two- month period the plus strain was the less reactive by 96.3 seconds. This test series, fortunately conducted at the close of selection, showed conclusively that there was no effect of selection in this line; or, if there had actually been an effect of selection, that it had been lost. The selections were somewhat relaxed during the October-January period, but it does not seem probable that a real selective difference would have been lost so quickly. Hence, every- thing considered, the writer does not believe that the data for the ten-month period in which there was a consistent reaction-time difference between the two strains indicates an effect of selection. Line 740 is somewhat unique among the lines of Cladocera for which the data for vigor has been worked out, in that the minus strain was on the whole more vigorous. Of the 29 two-month periods, the minus strain was the more vigorous as measured by the repro- ductive index for 18 periods and the plus strain was the more vigorous of the two for only 11 periods. The differences in favor of the plus strain average somewhat larger than those favoring the minus strain, however. Examining these data with reference to periods of superior- ity in the reproductive index on the part of the two strains, one fails to find any correlation between relatively greater reactiveness and greater vigor. For the 5 two-month periods during which the re- productive index for the plus strain was superior to that for the minus strain by 0.25 or more, the plus strain had a higher reaction- time twice and a lower reaction-time three times. For the 6 two- month periods for which the reproductive index for the minus strain was superior to that for the plus strain by 0.25 or more, the reaction- A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 89 time mean for the minus strain was higher four times and lower twice. Further detailed analysis fails to show any relation between mean reproductive index and mean reaction-time. The curves for Line 740 indicate clearly a marked general effect of environmental conditions upon the reactiveness of these animals. There are irregularities in the curve, but in a general way the reaction- time curves for the two strains follow each other remarkably well. It is possible that a mutation occurred in the minus strain of Line 740 in the forty-third generation of selection. A brood of 8 young on September 28, 1913, had the remarkably low reaction- time mean of 159 seconds. These were day-old young, however, and day-old young are sometimes abnormally reactive. Further, 4 of these 8 young were negative in their reactions, an unusual result, indicating unusual experimental conditions (see page 15). However, on the following day a brood of 8 from another mother of this strain had a mean of only 280 seconds. Examination of the other selection data for the same days showed that the broods of the strains of D. pulex from which selections were made were unusually reactive.- Fairly extensive tests of addi- tional broods of 740 minus and other strains of S. exspinosus extend- ing over several generations failed to show any consistently greater reactiveness in 740 minus, though certain descendants of the very reactive individuals of the minus strain of Line 740 produced broods some, but a minority, of which were very reactive. The results of these tests and the fact of the unusual reactive- ness of many of the broods of other strains tested during this period led to the conclusion that a mutation had probably not occurred and that the unusual reactiveness of the minus strain of Line 740 at that time had probably been caused by unusual experimental conditions. If a mutation did occur it should have remained apparent (in the absence of segregation) at least for a considerable period, in spite of any effect of selection. But after the second generation the reaction-means for 740 minus were normal, running usually above 700 seconds. Line 757. Presentation of Data. The data for Line 757 will be examined with great care, for with this line the result is different from that with most of the other lines used in these selection experiments, and it is desired to be conserva- tive regarding any conclusions that may be reached regarding the effect of selection within this line. The original mother of Line 757 was obtained October 19, 1912, from Pond I, the temporary surface-water pond. Selection was begun with her first laboratory brood of young and continued for 181 generations, covering a period of 4^ years. 90 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF The tabulations of the data and the diagrams employed are practically identical with those used in presenting the data for Line 695 and the other lines to which rather careful treatment has been accorded. They are: tabulations of the data by broods for the 757 plus strain and the 757 minus strain (tables 41 and 42); tabulation by two-month periods (tables 43 and 44) ; a summary of the selection data, including the results of the test series (table 45) ; a tabulation of the data for the same-day broods (table 46) ; summary of data for more reactive individuals (table 47); figure 18b, showing graphically the mean reaction-times of the two strains by two-month periods; figure 19, showing the reaction-time curves by six-month periods; figure 16, showing the relative rates of descent of the two strains; figure 17a, representing the average brood-size for the two strains; figure 17b, showing average age of mothers at the time the first broods were produced; figure 17c, giving the reproductive indices for the two strains; and figure 18a, showing graphically the differ- ences in vigor of the two strains as indicated by the reproductive indices. Tables 48 and 49, comparing the data for Line 757 with that for the other S. exspinosus lines*, are also presented, and the data in them are graphically presented in figures 15 and 18b. Examination of tables 41 and 42 shows that in Line 757, as with all the lines subjected to selection, there are considerable fluctuations in the reactiveness of individual broods. During the first 5 months of selection the range in mean reaction-time by broods for the plus strain was from 472 to 900 seconds and for the minus strain from 586 to 900 seconds. The fluctuations in reaction-time means by broods were still large after the two strains became widely different in their reactiveness to light. For the last 5 months of selection with Line 757 the plus strain means ranged from 93 to 651 seconds and the minus strain means from 133 to 814 seconds. Although brood-by-brood comparison (tables 41 and 42) shows clearly that in general, after the early part of the selection experi- ment with Line 757, the minus broods were very much the less re- active, the rather wide fluctuations by brood averages made it desir- able to treat the data by larger units. Tables of the data by one-month periods were made.1 From the averages in these tables it was found that for the first 9 months of selection the plus strain of Line 757 was the more reactive for 7 months; for the second longer period (the year August 1913-July 1914) the plus was the more reactive during 10 months; for the third longer period the plus was the more reactive during 10 months; for the remaining 21 months of the experiment the plus was the more reactive during each month. After the first 5 months of selection 1 These are omitted from the paper for the sake of reducing the cost of publication and in favor of retaining in the paper the tables of data by broods in which the original data are given in sufficient detail to make possible their utilization by anyone who might wish to examine the data statistically. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTI BR. 91 Table 41. — Summary of selection data by broods J or L 7 plus. a J3 1 M O "3 45 1 0 4-> a a a OB ■a 1 a a 0 u O 01 a -a 0 a 1 3 a 0 03 a a 3. * 0 B V B I J «3 a 0 i a O s E a "■S m 0 0. 0 m — a 0 a 0J a 0 ■s & .O 0 jj, "5 — '■*-> -*-> 0 .§ 0 a aj a! "0 a a "3 a 0 3-c a a 0 03 ■3 0 9 1 s '■5 'C <* « > V O a a M 0 V a 2 60 a u In S 0 ■ 0 . P< ^ * a & • — > a > O 6 9 cj *4 CM 8 § a § . ? ■-— — 0 v _ <0 S c • - 0 a 0 ._. a; 2 M 'x O 3 S C3 Zj O -0 a a s a as m t3 s g E a 1 s a ■ 0 s S a CO 1912 A Nov. 16 2 0 3 15.0°C. 0 3 900 900 2700 900 2430000 B Nov. 26 2 0 3 16.4 0 1 90 900 1415 472 998725 C Dec. 11 1 0 9 19 0 8 250 900 7450 828 6542500 D Dec. 21 11 0 7 16 0 4 105 900 4030 576 3308350 E Dec. 30 1913 2 Oor 1 11 16 0 6 130 900 7525 684 5916475 F Jan. 7 2 0 28 17 0 20 70 900 20700 743 17572800 G Jan. 15 2 0 9 15 0 4 130 900 6025 669 4805025 H Jan. 22 2 0 12 14.1 0 12 900 900 10X00 900 9720000 I Jan. 30 1 0 6 15.4 0 5 130 900 4630 772 4066900 J Feb. 10 2 0 11 10.4 0 9 260 900 8860 886 7607600O K Feb. 19 2 0 12 12.8 0 9 250 900 9110 759 7642100 L Feb. 28 2 0 15 16.2 0 9 250 900 11325 755 9276025 M Mar. 10 1 Oor 1 15 15 0 12 195 900 12070 805 10354850 N May 19 3 0 8 13.1 0 5 585 900 6540 818 5459850 O Mar. 28 4 0 11 13.3 . 0 11 900 900 9900 900 8910000 P April 7 5 Oor 1 10 14.8 0 7 205 900 7295 730 6021675 Q April 14 4 Oor 1 13 18 0 11 300 900 10530 810 9108900 R April 22 4 0 14 18 0 14 900 900 12600 900 11340000 s April 29 3 0 12 16 0 6 420 900 8330 694 6311900 T May 7 2 0 14 17 0 14 900 900 12600 900 11340000 u May 17 3 0 19 16.2 0 14 252 900 14277 761 11975079 V June 4 5 0 11 19.2 0 1 275 900 5185 471 3018275 W June 13 2 0 12 17.5 0 12 900 900 10800 900 9720000 X' June 20 2 0 14 19.5 0 13 580 900 12285 877 10872225 Y June 26 3 0 12 20.6 0 12 900 900 10800 900 9720000 z July 3 July 9 July 18 July 30 Aug. 7 Aug. 13 Aug. 19 Aug. 26 Sept. 1 Sept. 8 Sept. 16 Sept. 22 Sept. 29 Oct. 6 3 0 8 22.3 0 7 720 900 7020 878 6188400 Ai 2 0 * 0 12 21 0 12 900 900 10800 900 9720000 Bj 4 3 22 0 3 900 900 2700 900 2430000 Ci 4 0 6 23 1 3 260 900 3850 642 2935700 Dj 3 0 11 21.5 0 11 900 900 9900 900 8910000 Ei 5 0 10 20.7 0 9 360 900 8460 846 7419600 Fj 7 0 17 23. 0 17 900 900 15300 900 13770000 G» Hi Ij Ji Ki 4 0 8 20 0 1 235 900 4000 500 2400850 2 0 16 21.7 0 1 92 900 4003 250 1519785 11 2 11 22 1 5 105 900 5970 643 4613358 10 0 14 13.9 0 11 251 900 11054 790 9449526 5 0 or 1 20 21 0 15 467 900 16342 817 13824500 Lj 10 2 13 16.5 0 5 192 900 6957 635 49814H7 Mi Nj Oj Pj Q* Ri S5 Tj U> Vj 11 0 14 17.4 0 11 343 900 11052 789 9355370 Oct. 13 11 1 8 16.6 0 0 63 670 29S0 373 1414066 Oct! 20 Oct. 31 Nov. 10 Nov. 21 Dec. 1 Dec. 8 Dec. 19 Dec. 30 3 0 8 18.8 0 6 385 900 6500 813 5519450 0 0 7 14.5 0 6 600 900 6000 857 5220000 11 11 1 0 5 8 16 13.7 0 0 1 6 161 302 900 900 2516 6061 503 758 1703646 5080085 11 1 14 16.5 0 0 118 548 2905 207 776709 11 0 9 13.4 0 4 191 900 5978 664 4609610 3 1 0 6 12 0 2 480 900 4394 732 3354148 0 4 10.5 0 2 160 900 2240 560 1724000 Wi X2 Y2 Zi Aj Ba Ca Dj Ea Fa Ga 1914 Jan. 7 Jan. 17 Jan. 24 Jan. 30 Feb. 6 Feb. 14 Feb. 21 Mar. 2 Mar. 11 Mar. 21 Mar. 30 April 8 April 16 May 1 2 4 2 1 5 1 4 5 1 3 11 2 4 4 4 0 0 8 11 12.4 15.3 0 0 0 8 192 810 538 900 2663 9700 333 SSJ 963695 8564950 0 18 15.8 0 12 115 900 12931 718 10619473 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 12 15.9 0 5 163 900 7234 603 :»:i'.i4950 13 14 20 12 16.2 17.1 13.6 15.8 0 1 0 1 13 11 6 1 900 450 165 116 900 900 900 '.Mil 11700 11480 9600 4020 900 S.'O 481 336 10530000 9773000 6265183 Hl'.lOS'.tl) 14 20.8 0 13 390 900 l.'D'.M 80 ; 10682100 12 16.3 0 2 192 900 5427 452 3241407 19 14 12 11 19 10 6 11 9 16.8 0 11 223 900 12903 679 10099829 18 6 0 3 95 900 5650 404 83 19050 Ha 19.1 18.5 0 10 220 (Mil 9911 826 8624600 Is 0 7 355 900 8438 767 Jl 19 19.2 0 10 70 900 1343! 707 Ka May 8 0 10 9O0 900 >.tOO( 900 8100000 Lj May 18 3 2 1 20 20.5 19.8 0 6 900 • MM 6401 900 4860000 Ma May 25 0 4 150 900 6211 565 4363339 N3 0, June 1 June 10 0 6 307 '.Mil 6544 727 5315338 92 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF Table 41. — Summary of selection data by broods for Line 757 plus — Continued. .2 13 i N o "3 i o 0 a a •a action- -*> o a CO 1 bo .9 = = s a a 3 c o a a a o 1 •a o 'fa e o OS • H — %-» i 00 3 al fa 4J o 0. Q fl a *» 51 £> o j>! ~ <— *3 '3 _o J o S 13 .3 13 a a "o 3 O o d '■5 1 m o '■+3 *c ti — > 3; -a 9 V oi 0 fa d o "-♦a 01 fa B a . o 0) fa 3 o) fa O . ail o3 . - — n § •— — o .a > c ■•3 ° a c ••* 03 3^ .1 § fa n ^ E c •n o o fa O tj 3 o .2 o S3 V a a) 3 a* OD *** O at a a o C3 -C 3 o 0> I* d §1 ■ > . oi o o 2 » 03 d) a » 63 a a O Q"a a < ft £ s-3 55^ ■z u 5 m S " 3 oi W S DQ 1914 Pi June 18 5 0 3 1*9.0°C. 0 2 305 900 2105 702 1713025 Qa June 26 11 0 5 22 0 3 365 900 3883 777 3232349 Ri July 4 11 0 11 19.7 0 11 900 900 9900 900 8910000 Sj July 13 4 1 24 21.1 0 24 900 900 21600 900 19440000 Tj July 18 12 0 8 24 0 7 110 900 6410 801 5682100 Uj July 25 1 0 5 22 0 4 120 900 3720 744 3254400 V, Aug. 4 2 0 12 21.8 1 5 200 900 6545 545 4688525 Wj Aug. 10 3 0 11 23.2 1 1 140 900 3753 341 1790699 X. Aug. 17 2 1 10 21.4 0 0 162 775 4257 426 2229417 Ya Aug. 22 5 0 10 22.9 0 9 402 900 8502 850 7451604 z, Aug. 28 4 0 10 19.7 0 6 480 900 7950 795 6533700 At Sept. 7 4 1 •40 21.6 0 19 128 900 24689 617 18907437 Bi Sept. 17 11 0 6 16.3 0 0 170 261 1291 215 283171 C« Sept. 24 3 0 21 20 0 8 136 900 12592 600 9322494 D4 Oct. 5 3 1 16 19.6 0 0 70 570 3352 210 914534 E« Oct. 12 4 0 12 19.1 1 2 145 900 5146 429 2869308 F. Oct. 20 3 0 16 21 0 11 210 900 11402 713 9395010 G4 Oct. 28 5 0 16 18 1 13 305 900 12890 806 11021250 H« Nov. 6 3 0 18 18.1 0 11 90 900 12694 705 10183674 U Nov. 13 2 0 15 18 0 13 310 900 12350 823 10741700 J« Nov. 20 4 0 14 21.1 0 12 543 900 12131 867 10635793 K4 Nov. 28 11 0 12 18 0 7 270 900 8275 690 6602575 L4 Dec. 4 3 0 10 18.4 0 10 900 900 9000 900 8100000 M« Dec. 11 5 0 7 18 0 7 900 900 6300 900 5670000 N4 Dec. 22 4 0 12 15.7 1 2 168 900 5319 443 3079429 Os Dec. 31 1915 10 1 12 15.2 0 6 133 900 7831 653 6116351 P« Jan. 8 3 0 8 19.6 0 4 230 900 5656 707 4498818 Q« Jan. 15 2 0 8 19.2 0 8 900 900 7200 900 6480000 R* Jan. 25 3 0 12 17 0 7 220 900 7982 665 6282834 S« Feb. 4 4 0 14 13.5 0 9 65 900 9133 652 7584279 T4 Feb. 16 1 0 12 17.3 0 2 185 900 5308 442 3055384 U4 Feb. 24 4 0 10 20 0 0 75 465 1910 191 505550 v« Mar. 6 5 0 7 19.2 0 0 80 388 1022 146 315738 W4 Mar. 15 3 0 13 17.9 0 1 136 900 4182 322 1879940 X'4 Mar. 24 2 0 10 17 0 4 185 900 5627 563 4022017 Y« April 2 10 0 15 16.6 0 6 120 900 9619 641 7424255 Z« April 12 5 0 14 20.5 0 13 500 900 12200 459 10780000 As April 21 8 Random distr butic n. Bs May 5 2 0 8 18.9 1 1 183 900 4146 518 2654998 Cs May 15 3 0 10 16 0 4 340 900 6782 678 5107074 D, May 28 3 0 6 16 0 0 160 715 1816 303 767146 Es June 8 4 0 16 18.9 0 6 210 900 8546 534 5928436 Fs June 14 1 0 17 20.5 0 3 183 900 7695 453 4353433 Gs June 22 9 0 9 20 0 5 400 900 6731 748 5390501 Hs July 1 4 0 10 20.4 0 3 372 900 6375 638 4499029 Is July 8 4 0 11 21 0 11 900 900 9900 900 8910000 Js July 15 3 0 11 21.9 0 6 120 900 7571 688 6273601 Ks July 22 4 0 7 21.1 0 0 115 727 3522 503 2063154 L, July 30 3 0 4 23 0 0 130 390 976 244 275146 Ms Aug. 13 4 0 6 23 0 5 410 900 4910 818 4218100 Ns Aug. 19 5 0 5 19.3 0 3 65 900 3225 645 2645825 Os Aug. 26 4 0 7 20.2 0 5 210 900 4990 713 4172500 Ps Sept. 6 6 0 8 20.3 0 2 200 900 4195 524 2842925 Qs Sept. 12 5 0 12 21.2 6 3 120 900 7065 589 5263925 Rs Sept. 17 4 0 10 23.9 1 6 180 900 7180 718 5814800 Ss Sept. 24 4 0 12 17.3 0 2 120 900 3670 306 2005500 Ts Oct. 4 4 1 15 17.6 0 7 150 900 8795 686 6556825 Us Oct. 13 4 0 13 17.5 0 9 185 900 9810 755 8112150 Vs Oct. 21 5 0 20 18.9 0 12 70 900 12760 638 10517450 W, Nov. 1 5 0 22 17.1 0 1 130 900 5995 273 2162325 Xs Nov. 10 4 0 18 14.1 0 0 100 390 4455 248 1264675 Ys Nov. 19 2 0 23 16.3 0 0 145 450 7550 328 2092500 • Probably two broods, the first brood having been overlooked until the second appeared. Inasmuch as the second brood (if there were two) was a day old before this test wa3 made, the first brood must then have been near 72 hours old. Obviously data for three-day-old individuals is not strictly comparable to the other data, nearly all of which was obtained from individuals less than 24 hours old. Hence, much as the writer dislikes to cull his data in any manner, the data for this day's test is omitted. However, it may be added that this is the only instance in the data of this publication in which any data has been rejected. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 93 Table 41. -Summanj of selection data by broods for Line 757 plus— Continued. a ■ CJ • o a a a ■ 1 'J3 O •ja ■*> **■* •-* 73 a a o B •6 a J M a '+? a taJ* e a ■3 a ra *j & a o 1 tn 9 a a o 6 a 00 o 33 a ■ o o 3 as •i: v i a N h *» 'n . o a a M o ■M o H 3 O w 03 -o a 9 3 — p ^ >> a "8 J si < a .a a M a 3 O >> *o 6 S5 H a V u 3 09 U « . a § 3 O > C 73 a a ■" 05 . cs o aj o o a 3 a G a •a ° p 01 o 'jf o a a u i- B^ '3 ° 5 to a o <*> OS 9 N o -a a a§ 3 s o a 33 a o *5 03 a u a a 9 M ■4 8 E a a ■ C 09 B a a 3 'S CO 1915 Zs Nov. 29 4 0 21 15.5°C. 5 2 145 900 7895 376 3806975 As B« Dec. 8 4 0 20 15.8 3 0 165 615 7115 356 2827225 Dec. 17 4 0 23 20.2 1 0 120 580 6145 267 1866475 Cs Dec. 27 1916 5 1 21 14.9 5 1 95 900 5400 257 2031375 Ds Jan. 7 8 0 5 16.5 0 5 900 900 4500 900 4050000 En Jan. 17 9 0 6 16.8 0 0 140 240 1105 184 210725 Ft Jan. 26 5 0 20 15.1 0 1 110 900 5420 271 2113350 Ga Feb. 4 9 0 17 12 0 4 60 900 7060 415 4527250 H« Feb. 15 8 0 15 16.6 0 6 200 900 7750 517 5206900 la Mar. 1» 9 0 26 17 0 26 900 900 23400 900 21060000 Ja Mar. 13 2 1 17 18 0 3 120 900 6225 366 3436175 K« Mar. 22 4 0 19 15.9 0 3 90 900 5690 379 3423300 La Mar. 31 9 0 5 15.1 1 0 135 580 1770 354 756750 M6b May 4 7 0 4 14 0 3 190 900 2890 723 2466100 Ne May 15 4 0 24 15.8 0 3 170 900 8625 359 2625625 o« May 25 3 0 17 18.5 0 16 210 900 14610 859 13004100 P« June 8 3 7 19.6 0 4 175 900 4370 624 3455450 Qa June 19 4 15 20.2 0 5 270 900 8805 587 6066825 R« June 28 5 13 20.6 0 0 75 805 4483 345 2002129 Sa July 5 4 11 18.9 0 1 110 900 3560 324 1777550 Ta July 12 5 11 23.7 0 1 150 900 3520 320 1565800 Ua July 18 3 9 21.5 0 0 130 330 2060 229 506400 Va July 24 4 8 22 0 4 90 900 4390 549 3418900 W6 Aug. 1 3 0 19 20.6 0 6 85 900 10240 539 6987650 Xa Aug. 9 Select on made aut rec( >rd incomp lete. Yi Aug. 16 11 0 14 19.9 0 1 120 900 4110 294 1737800 Za Aug. 22 3 0 8 21.8 0 8 90 900 7200 900 64S0000 At Aug. 28 3 1 14 18.5 0 1 90 900 3770 269 1671700 B7 Sept. 5 2 1 13 20.5 0 0 60 390 2360 182 559150 C7 Sept. 11 3 0 14 16.5 0 7 210 900 8780 627 6614000 D7 Sept. 30 Random distribution. E7 F7 G7 Oct. 21 Oct. 31 Nov. 10 3 22 11 Random distribution. Random distribution. 17 || 0 | 0 1 70 390 2180 198 500200 4 0 H7 I7 Jt Nov. 20 Nov. 29 Dec. 11 14 9 12 Random distribution. Random distribution. 11.5 || 0 1 1 | 130 14 II 0 [ 1 1 190 900 4480 337 2272600 2 1 K7 Dec. 20 3 0 6 900 2220 370 1173600 L7 Dec. 30 1917 19 Random distribution. 1 | M7 Jan. 10 2 0 12 18 (1 0 1 5 | 130 900 7810 651 6003700 N7 o7 Jan. 19 Jan. 30 7 6 Random distribution. 15 |l 0 | 0 | 40 180 560 93 67400 4 1 P7 Q7 Feb. 7 Feb. 16 Random distribution. 460 1895 211 509025 2 0 9 9.8 0 0 120 R7 Feb. 24 3 0 14 12 0 2 90 900 3730 266 2003100 S7 Mar. 4 2 0 15 11 0 3 100 900 5020 335 2917000 T7 Mar. 13 3 0 12 13 0 2 70 900 3946 329 2332716 U7 Mar. 21 3 0 16 14 0 0 60 270 2205 138 352225 V7 Mar. 29 2 0 8 14 0 0 80 170 1010 1 .'t> 134300 w7 April 9 3 0 12 12 0 0 50 160 1310 109 161100 X7 April 18 2 1 10 15 0 0 40 525 1671 167 466759 Y7 April 25 2 0 20 14 0 0 60 185 2210 111 265216 * Second brood from this mother. b The Ms generation was taken from a very late brood of the L« generation which was used in con- ducting a test series. 94 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF Table 42. — Summary of selection data by broods for Line 757 minus. a i M "5 ■ a o 43 a a _B CO 1 ID o 43 a o B a a o •J3 03 9 a CO 8 C o 6 o .2 a DO s *a a •a o o c. o 03 o J3 '■♦3 a 43 1 a 00 a u a '■S a u M M 00 43 .2 o o 1 43 C o 0 43 o o . 1 S a a H c o a fa ~V > '+3 3 O 2 -a > a "■3 o d 5 o 43 o 03 6 M CO 8 N cS 3 a o "43 03 "3*2 CO O - 2 O •— o u h 3 a o 3 g o . 2 m C 3 a a •" 03 1- E a i- "3 c a _ o 43 O 09 CO u a m **- O m S a 0 0 •3 2 Q53 3 O M a, < 6 £ 3 . > O ^3 O QJ •z u .a § a s 3 s c3 CD a a CD 1912 A Nov. 15 i 0 5 18 0 5 900 900 4500 900 4050000 B Nov. 27 2 0 3 16 0 3 900 900 2700 900 2430000 C Dec. 9 2 0 or 1 6 13.5 0 4 245 900 4130 688 3381250 D Dec. 20 2 0 13 19 0 11 190 900 10615 817 9221725 E Dec. 30 1913 2 0 or 1 14 16 0 8 260 900 10090 721 8078950 F Jan. 8 2 0 9 17.5 0 5 65 900 5270 586 4255950 G Jan. 16 1 0 2 16 0 2 900 900 1800 900 1620000 H Jan. 24 2 0 6 15.5 0 2 184 900 3975 663 2959925 I Feb. 3 3 Oor 1 2 14.2 0 2 900 900 1800 900 1620000 J Feb. 12 2 0 12 13 0 11 320 900 10220 852 9012400 K Feb. 21 2 0 18 17 0 16 290 900 15120 840 13229000 L Mar. 3 1 0 or 1 9 11.8 0 7 250 900 7105 789 6040525 M Mar. 12 2 0 9 13.5 0 6 250 900 6570 730 5365700 N Mar. 21 5 0 8 ? 0 8 900 900 7200 900 6480000 O April 5 2 0 16 19.9 0 14 555 900 13825 864 12096925 P April 14 4 Oor 1 7 18.5 0 4 372 900 5082 7$3 4005684 Q April 21 2 Oor 1 10 13.4 0 10 900 900 9000 900 8100000 R April 28 3 Oor I 9 17.6 0 9 900 900 8100 900 7290000 S May 7 2 0 7 17 0 7 900 900 6300 900 5670000 T May 17 4 0 14 16.2 0 14 900 900 12600 900 11340000 U June 4 5 0 19 19.2 1 17 540 900 16550 876 14565700 V June 13 3 0 6 17.5 0 6 900 900 5400 900 4860000 w June 20 2 0 9 19.5 0 9 900 900 8100 900 7290000 X June 26 3 0 16 20.6 0 16 900 900 14400 900 12960000 Y July 3 3 0 7 22.3 0 7 900 900 6300 900 5670000 Z July 10 4 0 11 22 0 11 900 900 9900 900 8910000 Z« July 14 3 3 5 22 0 5 900 900 4500 900 4050000 A. July 23 4 0 3 22 0 3 900 900 2700 900 2430000 B, July 29 2 0 6 22.5 0 5 600 900 5100 850 4410000 C, Aug. 5 4 0 6 21.5 0 6 900 900 5400 900 4860000 Ds Aug. 13 5 0 4 20.7 0 4 900 900 3600 900 3240000 E, Aug. 19 7 0 12 23 0 12 900 900 10800 900 9720000 F, Aug. 26 4 0 8 20 1 7 840 900 7140 893 6375600 Gi Sept. 1 10 0 17 21.6 0 17 900 900 15300 900 13770000 H, Sept. 8 1 2 13 22 0 13 900 900 11700 900 10530000 I, Sept. 16 11 0 11 13.9 0 11 900 900 9900 900 8910000 J. Sept. 22 10 0 15 20 0 6 167 900 8720 581 6326504 Ki Sept. 29 11 0 17 17.1 0 17 900 900 15300 900 13770000 L, Oct. 7 4 0 6 19.8 0 6 900 900 5400 900 4860000 Mj Oct. 14 10 0 6 15.1 1 5 410 900 4910 818 4218100 N, Oct. 21 3 0 12 18.4 0 9 168 900 9843 820 8567649 O, Oct. 29 4 0 8 19.1 0 8 900 900 7200 900 6480000 Pi Nov. 8 11 0 6 17.7 0 3 242 900 3830 638 2942004 Q» Nov. 17 11 0 13 13.6 0 3 255 900 6454 497 3915506 Ri Nov. 28 11 0 15 15.5 0 13 305 900 12347 823 10739989 Si Dec. 6 11 0 11 14.2 0 11 900 900 9900 900 8910000 Ti Dec. 15 12 0 12 12.2 0 12 900 900 10800 900 9720000 Ui Dec. 24 1914 10 0 13 10.7 0 10 424 900 10534 810 8917876 V, Jan. 2 3 0 10 9.1 0 10 900 900 9000 900 8100000 w, Jan. 10 1 0 11 13.9 0 10 628 900 9628 875 8494384 Xi Jan. 21 5 1 11 14.3 0 10 378 900 9378 853 8242884 Yi Jan. 27 2 0 7 14 0 7 900 900 6300 900 5670000 Z, Feb. 9 1 0 1 9.8 0 1 900 900 900 900 810000 Ai Feb. 21 Rand om distrit >ution. B, Mar. 2 4 1 13 16.2 1 1 146 900 4907 378 2538887 C, Mar. 11 1 0 10 22 0 10 900 900 9000 900 8100000 D, Mar. 20 4 0 9 18.3 0 9 900 900 8100 900 7290000 E, Mar. 28 4 0 17 19 0 12 80 900 12530 737 10623900 F, April 6 3 0 9 17.2 0 7 300 900 6930 770 586S900 G, April 15 6 0 18 19.7 0 13 80 900 13490 749 11352300 H.»> May 7 6 0 4 20.7 0 3 735 900 3435 859 2970225 fa May 18 1 0 3 19.1 0 3 900 900 2700 900 2430000 Jl May 26 6 0 10 21.2 0 9 110 900 8210 821 7302100 K, June 2 1 0 11 19.1 0 9 370 900 8847 804 7569029 L, June 13 3 0 15 20.7 0 10 175 900 10424 695 8645366 • Selection was repeated from a later brood because of the loss of the earlier brood. b Death losses in this strain made this interval between generations unusually long. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 95 Table 42. — Summary of selection data by broods for Line 75? minus — Continued. IS t M O "a •*> 1 a 0 a a a T3 1 a a _o V3 09 h 5 a oj 0 B 0 ht CI 0 '■•3 0 ■3-g €0 O °iS .2 0 •4-3 a 1 a. M O *w 0 H 3 O a O V a "•+3 03 GO t3 j?.s i-s o.§ if 0. T3 0 0 M a H 3 a 0 >. O 6 55 a 1 0 & a a 03 M a> . n .9 a V u >f > 03 . M 05 1* a 03 u3 0 », -o 03 +- a3 4*4 3 O %T> > a ^3 a *v a a — 03 "s-S . 03 0 03 a> u O *o d 3° 5 0 ~ to CO O O 9 00 a 1 1 a _o •£3 0 03 a o "o 0 9) £ 60 a to-* c c 01 a | 1 0 o "■♦3 o 03 s o *j 1 T3 O O O, el a? "■3 i a "■+3 i a 00 a ■m ■S3 a ""3 05 h M b| GQ -t-i .2 0 o 1 o a o 0 1 4 .a a a a 3 o o o c3 '■5 o 5 a o "♦3 oa u D 53 GQ O a M ot "o hi m a a ■" 3 - ■si of a 3 o >> ■** o g 3 49 a] hi o . a.* cJ . bo en a, — a § •S3 "> a s c — a frf •- o II '3 O a 9 u _. 8 h .2 a as V Ph a H 03 3 o « a> fl .22 o 3 aj !^ £ c . t* . <3 G - 2 = S u C3 s s a e! — ' O 6 2 1* 2^ <5 3 S 03 8) 3 *3 03 1916 c Jan. 11 6 1 n 18 0 11 900 900 9900 900 8910000 D. Jan. 23 3 2 10 19 0 10 900 900 9000 900 8100000 E8 Feb. 1 5 0 6 11.2 0 6 900 900 5400 900 4860000 Fe Feb. 10 8 0 18 13.2 0 18 900 900 16200 900 14580000 Ga Feb. 19 3 0 14 15.5 0 4 140 900 6695 478 4428675 H6 Mar. 1 4 0 13 15 0 11 420 900 10920 840 9446400 It Mar. 11 4 0 12 16.4 0 7 90 900 7325 610 5909325 Jo Mar. 21 3 0 13 15.8 0 13 900 900 11700 900 10530000 K. Mar. 31 9 0 16 15.2 0 16 900 900 14400 900 12960000 L8 April 18 May 2 »71 Me 3 0 15 16.5 0 13 220 900 12210 814 10662500 N. May 13 10 0 18 16 0 18 900 900 16200 900 14580000 o« May 24 4 0 22 18.3 0 21 150 900 19050 866 17032500 P. June 1 2 0 13 18.5 0 7 65 900 8435 649 6765375 Q« June 12 4 1 18 17 0 17 240 900 15540 863 13S27600 R» June 22 4 0 12 18.6 0 0 60 450 3305 275 1141325 8a June 29 4 1 19 19 0 11 135 900 11825 622 9453525 T. July 6 8 0 11 19.2 0 11 900 900 9900 900 8910000 Ue July 14 4 1 7 21 0 6 175 900 5575 796 4890625 V, July 22 1 0 6 21.1 0 4 80 900 3770 628 3254900 W5b July 28 0 11 21 0 7 X. Aug. 4 11 0 3 19.3 1 2 420 900 2220 740 1796400 Y. Aug. 11 2 0 7 19 0 3 50 900 4110 587 3169150 Za Aug. 17 3 0 8 20.6 0 7 260 900 6560 820 5737600 At Aug. 24 9 1 8 21.3 0 8 900 900 7200 900 6480000 B7 Aug. 30 1 0 9 17 0 4 360 900 6470 719 4984500 Ct Sept. 6 3 0 12 19.5 0 9 220 900 9130 761 7702900 D7 Sept. 13 1 0 10 17 0 8 330 900 7880 780 6711400 E7 Oct. 20 Randc >m distrib ution. Ft Gt Oct. 29 Nov. 8 21 16 Random 16 distr 0 butic 14 n. 300 900 13200 825 11520000 2 0 Ht Nov. 17 2 0 14 13 0 12 64 900 11014 787 9746596 It Nov. 25 3 0 8 10.5 0 8 900 900 7200 900 6480000 Jt Dec. 7 2 0 7 13.2 0 1 50 900 2160 309 1208800 Kt Dec. 16 2 0 20 11.5 0 8 60 900 8990 450 6774100 L, Dec. 25 1917 Rand )m distrib ution. Mt Jan. 4 2 0 6 12.5 0 0 100 210 795 133 113725 Nt Jan. 13 4 0 10 11.2 0 2 80 900 2670 267 1717750 Ot Jan. 20 4 0 14 12 0 0 100 480 2970 212 735700 Pt Jan. 30 4 1 26 15.5 0 21 380 900 21150 814 18094900 Qt Feb. 10 3 1 4 10.5 0 2 450 900 2830 708 2158900 Rt Feb. 19 3 1 11 11 0 2 150 900 4560 415 2699800 St Feb. 28 2 1 7 10.5 0 3 110 900 3000 429 1996200 T, Mar. 9 3 0 9 17 0 7 50 900 6440 716 5680600 Ut Mar. 17 Randc >m distrib ution. Vt Mar. 26 3 1 10 15.5 0 7 110 900 7140 714 5948600 Wt April 3 2 0 16 15.2 0 9 130 900 9920 620 7822000 Xt April 1 1 3 0 15 13.5 0 4 270 900 8220 548 53S2400 Yt April 21 11 0 14 18 0 10 25 900 9419 673 8165063 •This selection made from a fourth brood of 71 individuals constituting a part of a test series. Data not included here as not strictly comparable to other data of this table. b Selection made, but time of beginning of experiment inadvertently omitted. the plus was the more reactive during every month except for 4 months during the period of irregularity in reactiveness in 1914 and 1915 (see pages 115-116 and table 44). Averages of the data by two-month periods (tables 41 and 42), such as are given for Lines 695, 689, 711, and 719, serve still further to compensate for temporary irregularities in reactiveness and are used in the analysis of the data for line 757 and as a basis for the curves given in figure 18b. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 97 Detailed Analysis of Data for Line 757. The curve of the reaction-times for Line 757 (figure 18b) begins with the December 1912-January 1913 period, though it includes a few reaction- time records obtained in November.1 The means for this period are identical, but in the following period there is a slight divergence (the minus strain being the less reactive) followed by irregular but in general increased divergences in the later two-month periods, so that the course of the curves is from the start suggestive of an effect of selection. There is one period of two months (June- July 1914) for which the minus strain had the lower reaction-time and the difference was fairly large (132 seconds; table 44). In 3 other two-month periods the minus strains had mean reaction-times only 2, 20, and 48 seconds higher than those for the plus strains for the corresponding periods. But in all the other two-month periods of the experiment after the first 5 months of selection the mean reaction-time for the minus strain was from 55 to 629 seconds higher than that for the plus strain o I 2 17 4 • 3 -e— e — - — e — - — e— e o *__# — o — » *- O6O7I0O ooioooo 0 ° 7 o o o o o g 3 3 ° 6 o 12 10 0 ll-l 4-5 8-9 12-1 4-5 8-9 12-1 4-5 8-9 12-1 4-5 8-9 12-1 4 »9I2 1913 1914 1915 1916 1917 Figure 16. — Line 757. Relative rates of descent of the two strains. (See figure 2a for description.) (tables 43 and 44). Hence the mean reaction-time differences by two-month periods are nearly all in the direction sought in selection, and most of them are differences of statistical significance. Calculated by longer periods, all the differences are of large statistical value, the minus strains being the less reactive. This will be made clear in the following detailed analysis. Reaction-time Means Compared by Longer Periods. For the first 9 months of the experiment (November 1912-July 1913) the means for the plus and minus strains (29 generations and 320 individual reaction-time records, and 28 generations and 261 1 Data for two abnormally small broods of each strain were obtained during November. These data consist of the reaction-times of only 6 individuals of the plus strain and 8 individuals of the minus strain, and of course give averages of little value, so that it seems best to combine these data with the data for the following two months in constructing the reaction-time curves. The means (see tables 43 and 44) for the two strains for November alone are 685 seconds for the plus strain and 900 seconds for the minus strain. All 8 of the minus strain and 4 of the 6 of the plus strain were "over-time" individuals. These meager data have little significance, except to indicate that both strains were very slightly reactive at the beginning of the experi- ment. For the December 1912-January 1913 period alone (excluding the few November records) the means are 747 and 718 seconds. Hence the curves with the data for November separate would start with the minus strain, the less reactive by 215 seconds, to be followed by the December- January period, when the plus was the less reactive by 29 seconds. In tables 43 and 44 the data are presented with the November data separate from those for the December- January period. 98 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF individual reaction-time records, respectively) were: for the plus strain 788.3 seconds, and for the minus strains 838.9 seconds (table 45). The difference (-50.6 ±11. 18 seconds) is 4.53 times the statistical probable error. These data include those for the 5 months at the beginning of the experiment, when selection was only slightly if at all effective. For this nine-month period there are 9 same-day broods, containing 114 and 99 individuals, with the reaction- time for the minus strain averaging 58 ±16.24 seconds greater than that Table 43. — Selection data summarized by two-month periods for Line 757 plxis. 9 -^ J. cj O ■ a o 43 a t a a 0 P. u — cj .2 .2 o •d m O. Ut M bfl-M V> *a *-*j 0 a CD Ml a 3 o <3 o o S § =3 O a '■£ a oi c - — 03 — © O 03 9 u d a? o o 09 o M a O d ■8 a a m 60 p >, a a, hi — a a a __, a a V a o >> *™ -a >> 73 u- 3 3 ~*f cj •M Time period. — o d og 63 J? "o3 > '-3 3 O > d a e] a .2 3 > *-*3 d f to 0 u o oo 0 .2 e3 u 3 a o O C c u -2 <». c d •A 2 o d "e3 o Average ag time first duced. Average N brood div age of mot 03 . M n ° IS C 3 "oTS . > C C ■ - o3 . C3 o o a o «* . ^ s ti a a <* . 03 cj g C 03 s M O a 3 03 ■3 a d o5 03 S T3 •d M 03 •o d 03 02 E a 3 oj O Nov. 1912 1-2 6 3.0 13.7 0.22 0 4 495 900 4115 685 318.01 87.57 Dec. 1912-Jan. 1913 3-9 7 82 11.7 9.8 1.19 0 59 245 900 61250 747 274 . 69 20.36 Feb.-Mar. 1913... 10-15 6 72 12.0 9.7 1.24 0 55 407 900 57S05 803 198.86 15.81 Apr-May 1913... 16-22 6 82 13.7 8.4 1.63 0 66 496 900 65632 800 208.50 15.53 June-July 1913... 23-29 8 78 9.6 7.4 1.30 1 63 679 900 63440 813 196.47 15.00 Aug.-Sept. 1913... 30-38 9 120 12.3 6.4 1.92 1 75 389 900 81986 683 301.07 18.54 Oct.-Nov. 1913. . . 39-45 6 50 9.1 8.2 1.11 0 30 309 862 35109 702 270.01 25.76 Dec. 1913-Jan. 1914 46-52 s 82 9.7 8.8 1.10 0 33 279 811 48045 586 309.38 23.04 Feb.-Mar. 1914... 53-59 7 104 14.9 8.3 1.80 2 57 348 900 67229 646 296.25 19.59 Apr-May 1914... 60-65 e 72 12.0 8.2 1.46 0 46 423 900 51828 720 266 . 32 21.17 June-July 1914... 66-73 8 76 9.9 7.6 1.30 0 61 395 900 60373 794 227 . 95 17.64 Aug.-Sept. 1914... 74-81 7 80 13.3 7.1 1.87 2 29 241 791 44890 561 298.18 22.47 Oct.-Nov. 1914. . . 82-89 8 119 15.0 8.3 1.81 2 69 243 859 78240 657 303.13 18.74 Dec. 1914-Jan. 1915 90-96 7 69 10.2 8.2 1.24 1 44 493 900 49288 714 269.78 21.91 Feb.-Mar. 1915... 97-102 6 66 11.4 9.5 1.20 0 16 121 742 27182 412 305.76 25.38 Apr-May 1915... 103-108 5 53 11.0 9.7 1.13 1 24 261 863 34563 652 281.37 26.07 June-July 1915... 109-116 8 85 9.9 7.6 1.30 0 34 304 815 51316 604 281.06 20.56 Aug.-Sept. 1915... 117-123 7 60 10.0 7.4 1.35 0 26 187 900 35235 587 323.40 28.16 Oct.-Nov. 1915. . . 124-130 7 132 17.8 9.2 1.93 5 31 132 763 57260 434 270 . 87 15.90 Dec. 1915-Jan. 1916 131-136 6 95 17.8 9.8 1.82 9 7 255 689 29685 312 200.72 13.89 Feb.-Mar. 1916... 137-142 6 99 15.2 10.3 1.48 1 42 251 847 51895 524 336.60 22.82 Apr-May 1916... 143-145 3 45 17.8 9.8 1.82 0 22 190 900 26125 581 255.24 25.66 June-July 1916. . . 146-152 7 74 10.6 8.3 1.28 0 15 143 805 31188 421 276.37 21.67 Aug.-Sept. 1916... 153-160 6 82 13.7 6.9 1.99 0 23 109 815 36460 445 309 . 23 23.03 Oct.-Nov. 1916. . . 161-165 1 11 12.8 11.0 1.16 0 0 70 390 2180 198 78.92 16.05 Dec. 1916-Jan. 1917 166-171 4 36 10.4 10.0 1.04 0 7 123 720 15070 419 298.80 33.59 Feb.-Mar. 1917... 172-178 6 74 12.3 8.8 1.40 0 7 87 600 17806 241 232.34 18.22 Apr. 1917 179-181 3 42 14.0 9.2 1.52 0 0 50 290 5191 124 77.53 8.07 for the plus strain. This difference is 3.59 times its probable error. Only one of these minus same-day broods had a mean reaction-time lower than that for the corresponding plus brood. For the year August 1913-July 1914 (44 generations and 504 individual reaction-time records, and 42 generations and 412 indi- viduals in the plus and minus strains, respectively), the mean re- action-times were 683.7 seconds and 783.0 seconds (table 45). The difference in mean reaction-time was —99.3 ±11.77 seconds, or 8.44 times the probable error. The 1 1 same-day broods for this period (145 and 123 individuals, table 46) gave a difference in reaction- A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 99 time of -135.0 ±21.74 seconds. Because of the smaller total numbers of individuals of the same-day broods, the statistical prob- able error was relatively large, but the difference was still 6.31 times the probable error. In only one of these same-day broods was the reaction-time for the brood of the minus strain smaller than that for the plus strain. However, during one period, the last two-month period of this year, the minus strain had a reaction-time 132 seconds lower than that for the plus strain. This was a period of rather Table 44. — Selection data summarized by two-month periods for Line 757 minus. T3 CD u S ft M -^ i 03 O m ft 3 cu ■a & c3 o> 3 > ■a ca t a a o -*> .2 B 1 a o '■*-> o 1 a o '■P o i B O a B 03 S a ■M o a o u o IM q 1 CD ■ XI o b a ea > «*4 i S m > >> -3 s 43 o a CD — C3 3 ** '*- cu CO XI 03 ^, C3 a 3 S h a 3 S3 1 '■+3 03 E "3 B C3 0) a ■M a J 4; «a E 9 in ft >> jQ ■a Time period. O u X o d 0 >. *o 6 55 o H 0 6 Z cu . g £ o § CU J M CD tfl . sp *s » Q ID ^* o o «•, ° o> &£ I > fto3 "3 '-+J «3 . M in £ 1 5 ° ^ 0) B B ■- 03 " cu . o3 O cu a •a 1 2 ° c a a ■a 03 a CD c3 cu cu B > •« a .2 '43 o 03 V E a 3 CO 3 ■3 a B oi g a '43 03 '£ cu ■o -T3 C 03 T3 B 03 4a 03 o u o u cu CD 3 as XI o H 0) n *- B ? > 0 a a ;a 0! xi CO — "3 <*. a 0 S-o 1 a .2 0 d h a a J ■ a 0 '•+3 0 03 V h a a a i a 0 0 03 B M "3 a •p 3 a a 03 B a M O a .2 03 a 03 B a 0 O 1 0 M a 03 0 a a B CD 0 0 a B E B cS >3 *o h O ■ 03 XI O N >. X) CD CO a o 03 "3 0 0 u. X 6 0 0 oj 0 bo £ 0 M . 03 0 a 2 u 4a OS . bo m a § a a ■a oj a 0 03 a to . -a B 03 CO 3 .Q 11) 0 a 2 '■3 a l B CD CD 3 2 S § c S a 3 o O 6 03 XI S? 5 03 "" o."2 . > I15 w 0 . 03 O CD 03 m 5P a $5 03 oj ■- - w a a ■-- 03 a ■0 a 03 QQ 03 £> 0 H 1- 0 CD -X cO "g Q03 03 0 H w so 22 a* Nov. 16, 1912- July 31, 1913 ( Plus I Minus . . 1-29 1-28 20 28 11.0 3.0 320 ^6/ 1 1 247 2^7 468 t?33 900 900 788.3 838.9 226.8 171.9 8.57 7.15 -60.6 ii.13 4. 63 Aug. 1, 1913- July 31, 1914 ( Plus t Minus . . 30-73 29-70 ■14 41 11.5 70.0 504 412 3 4 302 320 357 648 879 c954 683.7 783.0 290.4 238.1 8.72 7.91 -99.3 11.77 8.4A Test s e ri e s , Sept. 1913.. j Plus t Minus . . 34 33 14 14 23.0 20.2 322 367 7 9 74 33(5 112 406 823 900 409.0 859.7 301.7 149.1 11.34 5.25 -450.7 12.49 36.08 Aug. 1, 1913- Oct. 31, 1913 j Plus .... 1 Minus . . 30-42 29-41 13 13 12.1 10.4 157 135 1 2 98 376 745 882 900 691.2 853.4 292.0 166. 4 15.72 9.0S -162.2 13.16 8.93 Aug. 1, 1914- July 31, 1915 j Plus t Minus . . 74-116 71-114 41 43 11.5 7/.S 472 507 6 4 206 334 282 380 829 554 604.8 706.8 305.4 290.6 9.48 8.70 -102.0 12.37 7.93 Aug. 1, 1915- July 31, 1916 i Plus < Minus . . 117-152 115-163 36 37 14.0 12.9 505 22 6 143 376 190 467 811 888 458.2 770.2 294.7 260.7 8.84 7.93 -312.0 11. SI 26.20 Test series, Apr. 1916. .. j Plus ( Minus . . 143 14& 12 12 54.3 5£.4 652 677 0 0 433 642 172 189 900 900 697.0 864.6 309.3 156.3 8.17 4-05 -167.6 S.12 18.38 Mar. 1, 1916- May31, 1916 j Plus ( Minus . . 140-145 138-1 45 7 7 16.0 75. 6 112 70S 1 0 54 259 511 854 900 564.3 842.2 314.9 186.9 20.08 12.07 -277.9 23.43 11.86 Aug. 1, 1916- May 1, 1917. j Plus ( Minus . . 153-181 164-181 20 n 12.3 ;;.o 245 204 0 0 37 152 94 245 632 854 313.1 625.9 280.2 333.7 12.07 13.35 -312.8 18.37 17.01 Table 46 -Same-day broods. Summary of data for Line 757. 1 a 0 ■ a a 1 a a U O CD 1 03 O. •H 0 O 0 03 «*-« X> M a bo • ™3 0 +3 0 4d B a a . CD O E 03 o3 03 a 03 B a 03 ® CD S O >> 0 03 CD *3 * *" CD co J3 CD a U a CD O a a '3 to X) >, 03 *" fl 3 ■M 0 CD Time period. Strain. CO •a 0 Xi O 6 2 CD 3 > ■3 a "CD > 03 . bo co a S 13 :>a •a » 2 a •"■ 03 a -a a CD a •a 03 a CD 3 T3 ■p -3 a 03 > CD T3 T3 O u 0 B A T I T T T T T < ► A A * ° A ° i A * A. 600 - 450 - 300 - 150 - 00 ' x^ a r v ^ A r \ s> \ A/V ■ \ v / X \ ' B / / / / r 't \ \ - 1 t 1 1 \ / M '/ ; \ 1 i \ /A / > \ x M ' / i // / \ \ / / •' V/'' '/ \ // \ • s ™ - / \ s\ I n - - \ - Il-I 4-5 8-9 12-1 4-5 8-9 12-1 4-5 8-9 12-1 4-5 a- 9 12-1 4 1912 1913, 1914 1915 1916 1917 Figure 18. — Line 757. A. Reproductive indices, superiority. B. Reaction-time curves with composite curves for all the other Simocephalua plus and minus strains (from December 1914) superimposed. higher reaction-time by from 84 to 546 seconds. The test series conducted during April 1916 consisted of 652 individuals of the plus strain and 677 individuals of the minus strain (table 45). In every one of these 12 pairs of broods the brood from the minus strain had the higher reaction-time. The mean reaction-time for each strain was relatively high, presumably because of unusual environmental conditions. The means were 697.0 seconds for the plus strain and 864.6 seconds for the minus strain. The difference (-167.6 ±9. 12 seconds) was 18.38 times the probable error, a difference unmistakably significant. It can scarcely be doubted that if this test series had A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 103 been conducted during any of the following months (under usual environmental conditions), when the plus strain was more reactive, the plus strain would have had a much lower mean and the minus strain possibly a somewhat, but probably not much, lower mean, so that the difference would have been much larger.1 It is interesting, however, to have this test series come at a time of relatively high 900 l- 750 - GOO - 450 - 300 - Figure 19. — Line 757. Reaction-time curves by six-month periods with similar curves for Line 740 superimposed . As noted on pages 87 and 88, the minus strain of Line 740 was exceptionally slightly reactive compared with the other Simocephalus minus strains (Line 757 excepted) during the period from April to September 1916, while the 740 plus strain was exceptionally reactive during Octo- ber 1916 to January 1917. Hence the point representing the mean|for the minus strain for the "5-10" 1916 period is exceptionally high, while the point for the^plus^mean for„_the "11-4" period following is exceptionally low. reaction-time for the plus strain and yet find the difference in means so markedly significant. In the final nine-month period (August 1916-April 1917) of the experiment with Line 757, the mean for the minus strain was double 1 The mean for the minus strain in this test series was only 5 seconds higher than during the earlier test series conducted 2§ years earlier (September 1913). On the other hand, the mean for the plus strain was 2S8 seconds higher in the later than in the earlier test series. Yet, in general, the plus strain during the latter part of the experiment was very much more reactive than during the earlier portion of the experiment. The explanation of these peculiar means compared with the means for the selection data lies in the following facts: (1) The plus strain of Line 757 was more reactive than normally during the first test series. This was, in part at least, due to local experimental conditions. Of the 15 broods tested in making selections (in the laboratory strains of the different species) during the period when this test series was conducted, the broods in 11 strains had lower reaction-time means than the combined means for the immedi- ately preceding and next succeeding broods of the same strains and the differences were much larger than in the 4 cases in which the reverse relation held. Hence it is clear that the first test series for Line 757 was conducted at a time when local environmental conditions induced ab- normally low reaction-time averages in most of the Cladocera strains. (2) During the second test series the plus strain of Line 757 was relatively slightly reactive. The test-series mean for the plus strain was 697 seconds, a larger mean than had occurred in the selection data for 14 months and larger than occurred at any later two-month period of the experiment. Two broods used in selection tests in 757 plus soon after this test series was conducted had similar averages, but of the other 27 broods of this strain tested during the remainder of the selection experiment only one had an average as high as that for this entire test series. It seems clear that the 757 plus strain was in a relatively slightly reactive condition at the time of the second test series. 104 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF that for the plus strain. The means for both strains were lower than for any other longer period of the experiment (313.1 seconds for the plus and 625.9 seconds for the minus strain, table 45). The difference was —312.8 ±18. 37v seconds. The mean difference in reaction-time was slightly increased. Because of the much smaller total number of individuals, however, the probable error of the difference was larger, though the difference was still 17.01 times its probable error. There was only one same-day brood. Although from a single pair of broods little may wisely be assumed, it is interesting to note that the mean for the plus brood was 93 seconds, while that for the minus was 814 seconds, the latter mean being almost 9 times the former. While the reaction-time curves by two-month periods (figure 18b) clearly show the wide and increasing divergence in reactiveness between the two strains of Line 757, curves by six-month periods (November- April and May-October) are also given, together with similar curves for Line 740 for comparison with them (figure 19). Naturally these curves are less affected by local fluctuations and are smoother curves. Other Features of the Data. Examination of other features of the data for Line 757 brings out similar evidence of a marked effect of selection.1 The average minimum reaction-time2 for the two strains is a point on which their reactiveness may be compared. The average minimum reaction- time for the plus strain for the longer periods of the experiment was progressively lowered from 468 to 357, 282, 190, and 94 seconds (table 45). For the minus strain there was likewise a lowering, though not so great nor so consistent. The minus strain average minima were 639, 548, 380, 467, and 245 seconds (table 45). For the plus strain the average minimum for the last long period was only one-fifth that for the first of the 5 longer periods; for the minus strain the minimum for the last period was two-fifths that for the earliest period. The average minima for the two strains show wide differences throughout the experiment, the differences being 171, 191, 98, 277, and 151 seconds for the 5 longer periods. These differ- 1 In a single minor detail the data for a small portion of the time do not seem consistent with an effect of selection. This point is the relative numbers of negatively reacting individuals in the two strains. From August to December 1915 there were considerably more of the nega- tively reacting individuals in the plus (21) than in the minus (5) strain. This is of course con- trary to one's expectation in a less-reactive strain. However, 19 of the 21 negatively reacting individuals in the plus strain for this period occurred in four broods. Since in all strains negatively reacting individuals are extremely irregular in their occurrence, and when they do occur are often relatively numerous within a single brood, it seems probable that these reactions are in large measure determined by environmental conditions and hence are of little, if any, real significance (c/. page 15). If, however, they were to be ascribed an important significance here, this data alone (and only a very limited portion of it) runs counter to the plain implication of all the rest of the data for Line 757. During the remainder of the experiment the plus and minus strains of Line 757 had approximately equal numbers of negatively reacting individuals (tables 43 and 44). 2 This, of course, includes the reaction-time of only a single individual (the most reactive one) of each brood. Like the data for the average maximum reaction-time, it has much less value as a measure of reactiveness than the mean reaction-time for all the individuals tested; nevertheless, it is highly significant. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 105 ences are more instructive if stated in percentages. The average minima are 37, 54, 35, 146, and 161 per cent higher for the minus than for the plus strain. These differences clearly point to a marked and cumulative di- vergence in reactiveness of the most reactive individuals of the two strains, a divergence which became in the final period more than 3 times as great as the average minimum for the plus strain. It is a striking fact that for the last 9 months of the experiment the mean reaction-time for the plus strain was considerably lower than the average minimum reaction-time for the broods of the same strain for the first 21 months of the experiment. A comparison of the average maximum reaction-times is less instructive, for a large percentage of the broods of S. exspinosus contain over-time individuals; but even here comparison indicates increasingly greater reactiveness for the least reactive individuals of the broods of the plus strain toward the end of the experiment. For the first 9 months every brood in the plus strain as well as the minus strain contained over-time individuals and the average maximum reaction-time for each strain is (the arbitrary) 900 seconds. For the longer periods of the entire experiment the maxima for the plus strain declined from 900 to 879, 829, 811, and 632 seconds (table 45). There is a slight decline for the minus strain, the averages being 900, 884, 854, 888, and 854 seconds (table 45). The difference in average maximum reaction-time for the two strains increased from 0 to 5, 25, 77, and 222 seconds. The average maximum reaction-times are 0, 1, 3, 10, and 35 per cent higher for the minus than for the plus strain. For the minus strain the total lowering of the average maxi- mum reaction-time was only 46 seconds, or 5.1 per cent as compared with 268 seconds, or 29.8 per cent, for the plus strain. The data for the same-day broods may be referred to again. They, too, show an interesting decline in the mean for the plus strain through the various periods (from 798 to 670, 676, 538, and 93 seconds, table 46). The average for the last period is for a single brood and is abnormally low. The general trend is unmistakable, however. There is no marked lowering for the minus strain, the means being 857, 805, 876, 808, and 814 seconds (table 46). The in- creased divergence between the means for the two strains is striking — from 58 to 135, 200, 270, and 720 seconds. Stated in percentages, these differences for the several longer periods of the experiment, compared with the mean for the plus strain, are 7.3, 20.2, 29.6, 50.1, and 774.2 per cent. Again, although allowing that the difference for the last period was obtained from too meager data, the divergence is marked and continuous, and these differences arise from the most strictly comparable data obtainable. Considering the number of " over-time" individuals for the two strains in the different periods of the selection experiment is another 106 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF method of checking up the data (table 47). This is a test of vital significance. The number of over-time individuals is extremely significant of the reactiveness of a strain. For the 5 longer periods of the experiment the figures for the plus strain are 247, 302, 216, 143, and 37 over-time individuals; for the minus strain 227, 320, 334, 376, and 151 individuals. These can be compared better on a per- centage basis. The percentages of over-time individuals for the plus strain for the 5 longer periods of the experiment are 77.2, 59.9, 45.8, 28.3, and 15.1 per cent; for the minus strain 87, 77.7, 65.9, 77.4, and 57.2 per cent. Starting near equality (though the plus strain almost from the start had significantly fewer over-time indi- viduals), the differences are 9.8, 17.8, 20.1, 49.1, and 42.1 per cent. Hence the percentage of over-time individuals in the plus strain decreased throughout the experiment and particularly during the last 21 months of the experiment. The final percentage was less than one-fifth that for the earliest longer period. For the minus strain there was also a decrease, but it was less consistent, and in the end the percentage of over-time individuals was two-thirds as large as at the beginning (see table 47). It is possibly worth while to consider the mean-reaction times of the more reactive individuals of the two strains of Line 757, omitting from consideration for a moment the over-time individuals. While this is a point of interest, the fact remains that the relative number of over-time individuals is in itself as good a measure of reactiveness as might be desired. The large influence of the arbitrary reaction-times of 900 seconds, assumed for the over-time indi- viduals, does not ascribe too much influence in determining the mean reaction-time. In point of fact, the reverse is true. This arbitrary method of assuming 900 seconds as the reaction-time for the over- time individuals minimizes the rightful influence upon mean re- action-time of these relatively non-reactive individuals. The data are given in table 47 and show that there is a progressive reduction in the mean reaction- time for the more reactive individuals of both strains, considered by the longer periods of the experiment. This reduction for the minus strain is from 431 to 376, 334, 326, and 260 seconds; but for the plus strain the reduction is larger, from 410 to 360, 356, 284, and 209 seconds. The differences between the means for the two strains, with some irregularity, became larger, the plus strain having the lower reaction-time. These differences were as follows: —21, —16, +22, —43, and —51 seconds. The reduction in mean reaction-time for the plus strain in the final period as com- pared with the first period of the experiment was 201 seconds; for the minus strain, 171 seconds. The differences for the last two longer periods of the experiment have statistical significance, being respectively 2.97 and 4.2 times their probable errors. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 107 "o> e 3 S ■ B <» o g e ■& Si e S &2 - < •JOJJ3 ajq -cqojd Xq papiAip aauajajjiQ •aouajajjip jo ioua ajq-Bqojj •aonaiajjtQ 93 cm Co 5D »-.CM 1 + -I •io.ua ajqBqojj d 3»-< ocoo>*-«ooco93cmc> >-'CcQOOOic;'-<*H'»r^o CM*-**-«9>.i— l»"*i— lO^*-**"* •UB9J^ cm Oi cm o> r» oj t» -*t~ 6. OQO"si0 9inoooei T* >*■ CO 93 CO »3 CM 93 CM 9* •spsnptA -tpni aAT^OBaj ajora ioj saraii -noijOBaj jo eajBnbs jo rang -* ~*c-i»*t- 93 ci--.— <-<*■ i093iococoo:f~93Tfoo co t- i-i Oi m -*cc 0!NO MftiMOlONiCJN^N ■* ^i t- ~*CM ITS Tt< -*»"!> »-, (N UJ rj< ^ b- "o O C- CM id irsc-coto-— «!T?!ono i-l CO ~s •& <^t CO *H ^ *-« 'ejcnptAipni aAipcaj ajoui jo sanii^-uoi^o'Baj jo rang C2~?"CM -* rt ^ CM U3 CO 05 CM*-if"-93a:iJ3093Tf-i>oi<5 *—i *»< »-H >-^ "00 '09 "03 "OQ "05 • 3 -3 "3 -3 -3 3-~ 3-S 3-g D-3 3-5 I CO I *r I "3 I CD I . -HC! — ci-> >. _>> >. >> >"3 si "3 ti 3 si "3 si^ o^ 3^ 3hs 3.-S 3^; z < -< < < a "a 1- -*> 02 •a o a 108 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF Thus, for the moment ignoring the data for the less reactive (over-time) individuals, one finds that the more reactive individuals of the plus strain showed greater reactiveness than the more reactive individuals of the minus strain. These differences are not large and are not all in the same direction, but on the basis of this portion of the data alone there is evidence for an effect of selection, though naturally it is not as decisive as that obtained from the complete data. Relation Between Relative Vigor and Mean Reaction-Time. There remains to be considered the relation, if any, between the relative vigor of the two strains and their relative reactiveness. This is an important point. While it has already been shown that with the other lines subjected to selection in connection with which this point was considered, there is little, if any, relation between reactiveness and the general vigor of the stock, it still remains desirable to know whether such is certainly the case with Line 757. There is to be noted with the minus strain of Line 757, as with the minus strains of many other lines of Cladocera subjected to selection, a somewhat lower reproductive vigor than with the corresponding plus strain. This is presumably the result of the individuals selected in the minus strains being somewhat below the average in vigor. That this at the same time has not operated materially to increase the mean reaction-time of the minus strain is evident enough in nearly every line. The data for vigor and mean reaction-time considered for the other individual lines (and for all the lines as a whole) seem to show conclusively that there is no relation between vigor and reaction-time. While this suggests that in Line 757 the result of selection is not due to less vigor in the minus strain, yet it does not preclude the possibility that it may have been a factor in the divergence in reactiveness in Line 757. Some attention will now be directed toward an analysis of the data on mean reaction- time as related to vigor in this line. The matter of concern is whether there is a relation between the relative vigor of the two strains and their mean reaction-times, and, if there is a relationship, to what extent it is operative. Several more or less disconnected considera- tions will be taken up in regard' to this point before referring to the statistical correlations. The two strains were compared as to general vigor as revealed by the measures applied to them (see page 42) and stated in terms of the reproductive index (tables 43 and 44). 1 . The plus strain was on the whole the more vigorous of the two, as will be seen by reference to tables 43 and 44 and figure 18a. Of the 27 periods of 2 months each (except the first period of 3 months and the last period of 1 month) the plus strain was of superior vigor during 16 periods and the minus strain during 11 periods. The A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 109 quantitative differences in favor of the plus strain averaged greater than those for the minus strain, so that on the whole the plus strain averaged somewhat higher in reproductive vigor. For the first 11 periods (23 months) this superiority in vigor in the plus strain was marked; but, during the remainder of the experiment (16 two-month periods) during which the divergence in mean reaction-time became very large, the average superiority of the plus strain in reproductive vigor was slight indeed, and, in fact, during 9 of these 16 periods the minus strain was the more vigorous. This at once throws serious doubt upon the possibility of explaining any portion of the diver- gence in mean reaction-time as a result of a difference in vigor. 2. Near the middle of the curve for 5 successive two-month periods the minus strain showed (see figure 18, a and b) a slight superiority in reproductive vigor over the plus strain, and during this time the minus curve twice approached the plus curve, although in spite of its greater vigor the minus strain had a consistently higher reaction-time. Examination of the curves at this point might at first sight seem to suggest, however, that there was actually some effect upon mean reaction-time of the relatively greater vigor of the minus strain. At two points the curves covering this limited period are separated by spaces representing differences in reaction-times of only 64 and 20 seconds, but at the other three points the curves are separated by 219, 133, and 101 seconds (table 44). These last three divergences are larger than had occurred except in 3 of the 1 1 preced- ing periods of the experiment. The mean reaction-time for all the data for the plus strain during this ten-month period of superior vigor on the part of the minus strain was 613.7 seconds, 119.2 seconds (19 per cent) less than that for the minus strain, whose reproductive index during this time averaged 0.10 higher than that for the plus strain. This may be compared (a) with similar averages for all data for Line 757 obtained previous to October 1914, during which the mean reaction-times differed by 68.7 seconds (10 per cent), the minus strain having the higher reaction-time and a less vigor by 0.25; (b) with the period of 10 months immediately following the ten-month period of superior reproductive ability on the part of the minus strain, in which the plus strain was the superior in vigor by 0.19 and its reaction-time averaged 325 seconds (71 per cent) less; and (c) with the final 6 periods (11 months), during which the plus strain had a lower reproductive index by only 0.08 and a lower mean reaction-time by 300.6 seconds (nearly 89 per cent). This shows that the rapidly increasing percentage difference between the mean reaction- times was quite independent of the relative vigor of the two strains. Further, in the 2 two-month periods immediately preceding the 5 periods of superior vigor on the part of the minus strain just referred to, the minus strain showed a greater reactiveness to light 110 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF than the plus strain in one case and a practically equal reactiveness in the other case — a thing which did not occur elsewhere in the experiment — and yet the plus strain was markedly superior in vigor. 3. There were 10 two-month periods during which the vigor of the plus strain was quite above the average (figure 17c) the repro- ductive index being more than 1.50. The mean reaction-time for these periods of high vigor was 546.8 seconds, 36 seconds less than the mean for the plus strain for the entire period of the experiment. There were 9 corresponding periods of high vigor for the minus strain, for which the mean reaction-time was 768 seconds, 23 seconds greater than the mean for the entire period for this strain. There were 9 two-month periods during which the plus strain had a repro- ductive index under 1.25, somewhat below the average. For these periods the general average reaction- time was 634.9 seconds, 52 seconds above the average for the entire experiment. For 12 periods of correspondingly low reproductive indices in the minus strain the mean reaction-time was 770.8 seconds, 26 seconds above the average for the whole experiment. Hence in 3 of these 4 comparisons the mean reaction-times varied in the direction to indicate some relation between actual vigor and mean reaction-time. In one case the reverse is true. 4. A fairer method of making a comparison between relative vigor and mean reaction-times is a detailed period-by-period exami- nation of the data for reproductive index and the mean reaction- time. Comparing the mean reaction-time for the plus strain for the 10 periods of high reproductive indices (above 1.50) with the reaction- time means for the adjacent points in the curve (each representing two-month periods), it is seen (figures 17c and 18b) that in 2 cases the reaction- time means are higher than in the adjacent points in the curve, in 3 cases intermediate, and in 5 cases lower. For the 9 periods of like high reproductive indices for the minus strain, the mean reaction- times are higher than in the adjacent portions of the curves in 5 cases, intermediate in 1 case, and lower in 3 cases. A similar comparison for 9 periods of low reproductive index (below 1.25) in the plus strain shows that in 5 cases the mean reaction-time is higher than in adjacent points in the curve, and in 4 cases it is lower. For the 12 periods of like low reproductive indices in the minus strain the mean reaction-times are higher than in adjacent portions of the curve in 3 cases, intermediate in 5 cases, and lower in 4 cases. These comparisons indicate a possible slight relation be- tween mean reaction-time and reproductive vigor for the plus strain, high vigor being more often associated with greater reactiveness and a lower reaction-time; but the reverse relation is more strongly indicated for the minus strain, higher reproductive vigor being more often associated with less reactiveness and a higher reaction-time. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. Ill 5. Arbitrarily selecting the 6 periods of highest reproductive indices for the plus strain, they have, as compared with adjacent parts of the curve, a higher reaction-time twice, an intermediate reaction-time once, and a lower reaction-time 3 times. The minus strain for its 6 highest reproductive indices has a higher reaction- time 4 times, an intermediate reaction-time once, and a lower reac- tion-time once. The 5 periods of lowest reproductive indices for the plus strain have, as compared with adjacent points in the curve, a higher reaction-time 3 times and a lower reaction-time twice. The similar periods for the minus strain have a higher reaction-time in one case, an intermediate reaction-time in 3 cases, and a lower reaction-time once. The comparisons under (4) and (5) show some evidence of a relation between vigor and reaction-time in the plus strain, the mean reaction-time more often varying in the direction anticipated, if greater vigor is associated with greater promptness in reaction (and hence lower reaction-time) than in the reverse direction. But with the minus strain the differences are such as to indicate the reverse relation, i. e., greater vigor associated with less promptness in re- action (higher reaction-time). These small differences about neu- tralize each other and lead one to conclude, from this portion of the evidence, that there is probably no relation between vigor and reaction-time.1 6. For the two-month period during which the minus strain showed its greatest vigor (October-November 1914) its mean reaction- time was greater than at any other period except one, and much greater than the average for the succeeding 5 periods, during which its reproductive index was about 35 per cent lower. 7. It is worthy of note that 4 of the 6 high points in the curve of the reaction-times of the minus strain occur when the minus strain was superior in vigor to the plus strain. This, if considered alone, would seem to suggest a reverse relation between reproductive vigor and reaction-time, a relation which would seem not to have biological significance. 8. Attention may be directed to the two-month periods during which (even after the effect of selection appeared already to have become established) the minus strain had a reaction-time approxi- mating or lower than that for the plus strain. For the period June- July 1914, during which the minus strain was on the average the more reactive of the two, and the following two-month period during which the minus strain was the less reactive by only 2 seconds, the plus strain was markedly the more vigorous. For the February- March 1915 period, when the minus strain was within 64 seconds of the plus strain, the minus strain was slightly the more vigorous. 1 These data, however, might be taken to offer slight corroboration of the puzzling results obtained from the correlations based upon this data (see page 113). 112 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF For the following June-July period, during which the minus strain was within 20 seconds of being as reactive as the plus strain, it again was slightly the more vigorous. But it is noteworthy that in the period intervening between the two periods just referred to the minus strain was superior in vigor to the plus strain by a difference 3 times as great as in the other two periods, and yet the reaction-time for the minus strain was 101 seconds greater than that for the plus strain. For the last two-month period (December 1916-January 1917), in which the reaction- time mean for the minus approached that for the plus strain, the minus was considerably the more vigorous. It is noteworthy here, however, that in the period just preceding1 the minus strain showed greater superiority in vigor than at any other time, and yet its reaction-time differed from that for the plus by a larger margin (629 seconds) than for any other period of the experiment. This analysis might be prolonged further, but enough has been seen to make clear that there is at most a very slight rela- tion between the reproductive index and the mean reaction-time. Of the points discussed above, (3) and doubtfully (4) and (5) indicate a possible effect of vigor upon reaction-time in the plus strain (but not in the minus strain) — i. e., the greater the vigor the more reactive the individuals and the lower the reaction-time. But this bit of evidence is not very convincing, since the numerical differ- ences in the comparisons made are small and the differences in averages are not all in the right direction to bear out such a relation- ship. On the other hand, (1),# (2), and (8) fail to show the appearance of an effect of mean vigor upon mean reaction-time, while (5) (in part), (6), and (7) seem to indicate the reverse effect, that greater vigor is associated with lessened reactiveness and a higher reaction- time. Obviously, the best method of determining the relation, if any, between reproductive vigor and mean reaction-time is by statistical correlation. The mean reaction-times and mean reproductive indices, both by two-month averages, were correlated for the data for the Line 757 strains, using as the terms of the correlation the repro- ductive index of the mother and the mean reaction-time of her first brood of offspring. The correlation is -0.1109±0.127 for the plus strain and 0.0612 ±0.129 for the minus strain. In order to have a larger series, the data for both strains of Line 757 were thrown together.2 The resulting correlation is -0.12845 ±0.0902. These correlations are low, and, judged by their probable errors, are not of statististical significance. 1 The numbers of individuals tested during this period were abnormally small, so that these averages are not as trustworthy as most of the others, but the major part of this difference can not be regarded as accidental. 2 Since the two strains are different in their reactiveness to light, this combination of data is open to criticism, although it is reasonable to suppose that variations in vigor should influence the reaction-time in the two strains similarly. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 113 Correlations involving the individual reaction-times and the re- productive indices of the mothers were made. For the plus strain this data included every individual of Line 757 whose reaction-time was obtained in making the selections and the reproductive index of whose mother was known — a total of 1,992 individuals. The correlation was -0.000828 ±0.0151. For the minus strain (with 1,842 individuals) the corresponding correlation was 0.2154 ±0.0149. A negative correlation between vigor and reaction-time would have obvious biological significance, while a positive correlation would not, for it is difficult to see how less vigor would be causally asso- ciated with greater reactiveness (lower reaction-time). Both the correlations for the 757 plus strain are negative, but although sug- gestive, they are much too small to be statistically significant. The correlations for the 757 minus strain are both positive and the second, while not large, is 14 times its probable error. This is not convincing evidence, but on its face it indicates that in the minus strain of Line 757 the greater the vigor the higher the reaction-time; that is to say, a greater vigor is associated with less reactiveness and a lower vigor with greater reactiveness. Some possible corroboration of this anomalous state of affairs is seen under (4) and (5) above (page HO),1 but it is difficult to understand how this relation is possible. Further analysis of the data for Line 757 was attempted. Cor- relations were made between age of the mother at the time of pro- ducing her first brood and the reaction-times of her young; between the number in the brood (size of brood) and their reactiveness, and between the age of the mother and the size of her first brood. The correlations between the age of mothers and reactiveness of young were -0.03865 ±0.0205 for the plus strain (1,992 young) and — 0.01529±0.0157 (1,842 young) for the minus strain. Between the number in the brood and their reactiveness the correlations were -0.07619 ±0.0150 for the plus strain and 0.01606 ±0.0157 for the minus strain. Other things being equal (temperature, food, etc.), the more vigorous mothers reproduce earlier and the less vigorous mothers later. Hence a correlation of obvious biological significance between age of mothers and reactiveness of young should be positive. Both the correlations obtained were negative, but they were very low, and neither was of statistical significance. A biologically significant cor- relation between size of brood and reaction-time should apparently be negative. The correlation obtained for the data for the plus strain was negative and was 5 times its probable error, but it is numerically so small (-0.07619) that it at most indicates an ex- tremely slight relation between size of brood and reaction-time. The 1 Likewise, this fits with the observation recorded under (7) stated on page 111. 114 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF correlation obtained for the same data for the minus strain is positive and is too small to be of statistical significance.1 Considered on all points, there is little in the data or the course of the curves to indicate any appreciable relationship between the relative vigor of the two strains and their mean reaction-times. The comparisons made and the correlations calculated show that there is at most only a possible slight relation between average vigor (reproductive index) and mean reaction-time. The relation (if actually significant) is so small, however, that when the data are examined in many detailed ways it usually quite fails to appear and statistical correlations do not establish it. This possible relation is large enough at most to account for only a small portion of the fluc- tuations of the curves and at best for only a small fraction of the divergence between the mean reaction-times of the two strains of Line 757. Hence it becomes clear that fluctuations of the mean reaction-time curves of the two strains were controlled neither in direction nor in amount (to any appreciable extent at any rate) by the relative vigor of the two strains.2 While the writer is convinced that in Line 757 there is at most only a very slight relation between vigor and reaction-time and has already laboriously presented the evidence on this point from the data for Line 757 itself, this conclusion is perhaps even better justi- fied from consideration of the data for the plus and minus strains of the other Cladocera lines subjected to selection. Inspection of the curves showing mean reaction-times and reproductive indices for the other lines of Simocephalus exspinosus3 brings some crucial evidence to bear directly on this point. The data for Line 794 (tables 33 and 34, and figures 11, a, b, and c) show considerably greater reproductive superiority on the part of the plus strain (as compared with the corresponding minus strain) than in the plus strain of Line 757, yet the reaction-time means for the two strains of Line 794 run much nearer together than in Line 757. The data for Lines 795 (figures 12, a, b, and c) and 796 (figures 13, a, b, and c) show still greater differences in mean reproductive vigor of their plus and minus strains, yet there are no corresponding differences in mean reaction-time. The differences in mean reaction-time which occur in different parts of the curves for these lines do not at all lend 1 The correlations between age of mother and size of brood have no apparent bearing upon reactiveness, but they may be mentioned for their biological interest. The correlations obtained are —0.05785 ± 0.0525 for the plus strain and - 0.01732 ± 0.0527 for the minus strain. If one eliminates the data for mothers which did not produce their first broods until more than 11 days of age, thus eliminating the obviously weak mothers (since more than 11 days is an abnor- mally late reproductive age), the correlations are 0.11618 ± 0.0531 for the plus strain and 0.12409 ± 0.0533 for the minus strain. 2 It is obvious that if the vigor of the stock were extremely low the mean reaction-times should become higher, but this stock was always maintained at the highest possible vigor and the varying reproductive indices merely indicate various degrees of the always (except for very limited periods) successful maintenance of high levels of reproductive vigor. 3 See pages 44-45, 60 and 65 and figures 2, b and c, 3, b and C, 7, B and c, and 8, B and c, for treatment of this data for the D. pulex lines. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 115 themselves to explanation as due to differences in relative vigor. For example, during the period from October 1915 to May 1916, inclusive, the plus strains of Lines 795 and 796 were both greatly superior in reproductive vigor to the minus strains of the same lines (figures 12, a and b, and 13, a and b), yet during this time the plus strain of Line 795 was much less reactive than its minus strain, while the plus strain of Line 796 was more reactive than its minus strain. The curves for Line 740 (figures 14b and 15) are also instructive on this point. In general, the minus strain averaged slightly less reactive than the plus, yet it was on the whole consistently the more vigorous. It is obvious that reaction-time and reproductive vigor are on the whole, very slightly, if at all, related in S. exspinosus, and that differences in vigor do not explain the divergence in mean reaction- time so pronounced in Line 757. Further, there is no basis for an assumption that the reaction- time differences which arose in Line 757 are due to differences in swimming ability. If the difference in reaction-time in Line 757 arose from differences in swimming ability, the results are fully as interesting from a genetic standpoint as though they were due to differences in reactiveness to the light per se. But differences in swimming ability were not the source of the differences in reaction- time between the two strains of Line 757. As compared with the plus strains, individuals of the minus strain less often showed any tendency to react to light, i.e., many more were immobile throughout the time of the test, and individuals of the minus strain which did reach an end of the tank in general did so after more and longer inter- ruptions of swimming than occurred for individuals of the plus strain. It is not believed that anyone who observed the behavior of individuals of these two strains in the experimental tank and in the culture-bottles would countenance any suggestion that the dif- ferences between the two strains were due to differences either in general activity or in swimming ability. Special Features of the Reaction-Time Curves. The approximation of the curves (figure 18a) for mean reaction- times in Line 757, during 1914 and 1915, at first sight appears more significant than it really is. For 1 two-month period, June-July 1914, the minus strain was more reactive than the plus strain, and for the following two-month period the difference was only —2 seconds, while for the June-July 1915 period the plus strain averaged only 20 seconds lower in reaction-time than the minus strain; but in the intervening February-March period, for which the curves appear so nearly to approach, there is a difference of 64 seconds, or 16 per cent. That such fluctuations are to be expected occasionally would seem to be indicated by the fact that during the last longer (nine- 116 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF month) period of the experiment the mean for the minus strain for 1 two-month period (December 1916- January 1917) fell to within 48 seconds of that for the plus strain, yet, from consideration of the data for this line for the 21 months at the end of the experiment, no one would be inclined to question the validity of a real and large difference in reactiveness between the two strains. Further, periods of local shifts in reactiveness — changes which are believed to be purely environmental and non-genetic — are seen in other lines, e. g., Lines 695 and 740 (see pages 44 and 86), in which there is not evi- dence of an effect of selection. The approximation of the curves for the plus and minus strains during 1914 and again in 1915 seems to have been due to differential local environmental influences (see also pages 140-142). There is an additional suggestive feature of the general course of the curve for the Line 757 selection data. It is in the marked general lowering of the mean reaction-time for both the plus and minus strains of Line 757. The curve starts at 743 seconds for the plus strain1 and at the close of the experiment ends at 124 seconds.2 The average reaction-time for the plus strain for the first 9 months of selection was 788 seconds and for the last 9 months 313 seconds, while the intervening 3 year-periods of data show a pro- gressive and consistent lowering of this reaction-time as follows: 684, 605, 458. The form of the curve suggests that this lowering had not ceased, but was continuing when the experiment closed. The curve shows a slight lowering of the reaction-time for the 757 minus strain, but the amount is small and the mean reaction- times for the longer periods of the experiment do not indicate as large and consistent lowering in this as with the plus strain. The means for the minus strain for the longer periods are 839, 783, 707, 770, and 626 seconds. Extent of the Change in Reactiveness of the Line 757 Strains. The lowering of the mean reaction-time for the 757 plus strain may be examined further. When it is recalled that a mean reaction- time of 788 seconds (that for the plus strain for the first longer period) means that by far the greater part of the individuals failed to react3 to the light stimulation during the test (actually 77.2 per cent of the individuals of the plus strain during the first nine-month period failed to reach an end of the tank) and that a mean reaction-time of 313 seconds indicates that a great preponderance of the individuals responded to the light stimulation (only 15.1 per cent, less than one- tenth as many as during the earlier period, failed to respond during the final nine-month period) the decline in reaction-time from 788 seconds to 313 seconds takes a still greater significance. Not a 1 Average for 2}^ months' data, 88 individual records. 2 Average for 1 month's data, 42 individual records. 3 That is, reach an end of the tank during the 15-minute period of the test. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 117 single brood in the first longer period failed to contain individuals which did not respond during the 15 minutes to the test. In the final longer period nearly half the broods tested contained no over- time individuals. Of the last 10 broods tested, only 3 contained over-time individuals and the last 5 broods contained none. The change in reactiveness in this strain is also strikingly indicated by again referring to the average minimum reaction-times in the first and last periods. For the first nine-month period it was 468 seconds; in the last period 94 seconds. These figures, it will be recalled, refer only to the most reactive individuals of each brood, but when these have become 5 times as reactive as during the early period of the experiment, the fact can not fail to have considerable significance. The change in responsiveness in the plus strain of Line 757 was in no other way as striking to an observer as the change in the general behavior of the animals in the experimental tank. Early in the history of this strain the young daphnids, on being released in the experimental tank, ordinarily behaved as follows: first they settled to the bottom in a rather close group; after 3 to 5 minutes a few (usually less than 30 per cent) moved a little — ordinarily toward the source of light, though many movements were indifferent to the light. (In about a third of the earlier selection tests of entire broods, there was no movement at all after the animals settled to the bottom of the tank, though these were vigorous individuals.) Of the small number swimming toward the light, about two-thirds, in spite of many pauses, made their way to the end of the tank within the period (15 minutes) of the test. Toward the close of the selection experiment with Line 757, the behavior of the 757 plus strain was essentially as follows : the animals, on being released, ordinarily settled to the bottom as previously, but within a few seconds some of them began to swim toward the light and within a minute or two all were usually under way toward the positive end of the tank, which the majority reached with few interruptions of their swimming movements. In the earlier part of the experiment the animals frequently did not move a second time after once swimming for a moment and then settling to the bottom or holding fast to the surface film or the sides of the tank. At the close of the experiment the movements in the plus strain were not only more prompt and general, but were less often interrupted, and when interrupted were generally resumed rather promptly. There was to the eye of the observer possibly some increase in reactiveness of the 757 minus strain as exhibited in its general be- havior, but it was slight as compared with the change which occurred in the 757 plus strain. The lowered mean reaction-times for the strains of 757 during the course of the selection experiment are in partial accord with the general lowering of the mean which occurred for all of the strains 118 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF of Simocephalus during the course of the selection experiment. This general lowering of the mean is probably attributable to environ- mental conditions (see pages 137-1 39). x But in the case of the 757 minus strain, and particularly during the final 11 months of the experiment, the mean was lowered much less than that for each of the other 9 selected strains of this species. Selection here seems to have operated to hold the mean much higher than it otherwise would have been. Reactiveness of Both Strains of Line 757 Modified Through Selection. Another method of checking up the effect of selection in Line 757 is by a detailed comparison of the mean reaction- times of the plus and minus strains of Line 757 with corresponding data for Line 740, with which it is most similar in point of time of beginning the selections and in duration of the selection experiment; and by a further comparison of the reaction-time means for the two strains of Line 757 with corresponding mean reaction-times for the plus and the minus strains of the other lines of the same species, Lines 794, 795, and 796. This comparison is given in detail in tables 48 and 49 and serves to show whether both the plus and minus strains of Line 757 became modified during the selection or whether the divergence between the two strains of this line resulted from a genetic change in reactiveness of the minus strain alone. This would seem to have an important bearing upon the question as to whether the results came from mutation or gradual change in Line 757. It would seem less easy to explain the result as due to larger mutations if both the plus and minus strains of Line 757 were affected, i. e., departed from the means for corresponding strains of the other lines of the same species, than if only one of the two strains of Line 757 was affected. The comparison between the mean reaction-times of the Line 757 plus strain and the plus strains of the other S. exspinosus lines is the more crucial test, for it is obvious, by mere inspection and com- parison of the figures (figures lie, 12c, 13c, 15, and 18c) showing the reaction-time curves for Line 757 and the other S. exspinosus lines, that the Line 757 minus strain became much less reactive than any of the other S. exspinosus strains. The following analysis seems to show, however, that the plus strain of Line 757 likewise became more reactive than the plus strain of Line 740 or than the plus strains of the other S. exspinosus lines. The curves showing reaction-time means for the plus strain of Line 757 (figures 18b and 19) are somewhat irregular, but their 1 Possibly the general lowering of the means in both the plus and minus strains of all the lines of S. exspinosus is to be accounted for through a better handling of the material as the exper- iment progressed. No intentional changes in the handling of the material were made after about July 1912, however, and we were not conscious of any better manipulation as the experiments progressed. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 119 CO 1- co Co 13 «« 3 go <^ .B co fi ■^ •io Kj CO - "& fi £ *- M *) ~ SO a fi CO s CO P. S3 c» -B fi 0 ■«a u eo fi 41 BQ W "B ^ CJ s-< fi co 0 B "ra V. M CO CO s K CO > S fi ft Q CO H co s- DQ S u n 0 <— U CO 1 s 1 rd CO "* co CO CO 3 > p *-* T) 0> n a 03 ID -*-> g ■J a a, >f IQ w CJ a a sa •2.1 c M CJ.S e:s c * J51 V £} CO CO c a OS to 's° a OQ o •joj -13 ajqBqojd iCq paptAtp 30a3J3JJIQ •aouajsj -jip jo SJOJ -je ajqBqojj •30U3J3JJIQ •joj -J3 3[qt:qojd Aq papiAip 33U3 J3JJIQ • *f CN^CO •c-oo - I-l X I-l T^ ~ z.z. s. • cot^xco ■CM CM CM CM •CM r(i — itji ■ T)< iO t^ U5 1 + 1 + co caosocoo co x w -. c c *o o *- io co ^-* »-t ^ t> — • -r t^ oo ci OOOCIiOH cocacoo iO rfi — (N^COOO «-" CO O) lO 00 CO CO o CO M< CO CN CO i-c CO « rt so O O N CO CO -*CNOCOt1^ CN CNCN>-l CO co NN«CCOO> CNOCNOOO t^COOCOCOCN CN CO CO CO CO CO rt ■* i-l r)< CD ^ 00 *H l«Cl*-HfON CO CN O "^ CD CO O >-H COCOCOCOCOCN CO co •aouajajjtQ C. CO "-O CN COCN CN CO O TfCOOt^OOOO O 00 CO CO >-H CO 00 CO -HNr-COiOO I « I 1^-iCN I ++ 1 I I CO-HQ-fOiO CO i-i IC5 CO •- < CO CN 00 tj< I IOC0 COCN + '+++ CO + COOO-'OCO COCN COI^ •-' o OO >-* COODOiOUJ «-< "s" co oo o "-• I o H5CCMOMO) -hCOcDOOO COCN CNCN CM CN CD 00CO— ICNOCO 00 O CN xoo cot^o CN CO CO CO CM CO O CO COCONCO^O ■* r~ O cn io -H !OaO«)HON COCN CM CO CO CO •sn[d ^0^, aun 00 00 00 CO I^OOO CM i-i CM i-i 00 O O COCMCOO CO CM CM HOCOIDN ONOOOM CO CM CO CM CM CM co cn i-i t^r^ coo o xcociiohh O OOCDG0G00 CN CNCOCMCOCM CM "5 O CO CO f X t>- CO CM CO O CO COOO co»o CO cm r-- o co o t» CO CM CM CO CNCN 0 4> V, 2 » S S-5 •suibj^s srqd snsouidsM 'S **Moqs nv OMCOi — iCNOCN CO iO COCO o wiomoncs O iji COX IO CO CO >0 CD *C UD *C CO »0 siqd ot-2, 3un; CM OOCO IONCOCC O »C iO CN »0 O CO Tji CNOOCX t- IO t^ CD ICO IO t» CMCMXCOCOO CN O OiOiOiJiXCM -^i lO t*» CO CD lO CD CO CO ■-ifNNON SMOoxn «-0 CD CO CD CD »0 snjd £g£ 9uji ^ "3 -a «j 0> to <* HZ) +* a ■suira j;s snjd snsouidsx? •y ja^joqs jiv cocooco ■*oo— i r^xxx X COCNCOCOO ^Ji X XOX^l" CNC3 t~ CD t>- lO CD t^- t>- CO i-it>.«*iCMCNr)i «5 X cOiOi-i^-iOO O CD lT5CDf~TficOCD CD V I-« ^ CN "* « rt O COCO ^* CM X CM lO >0 ■V CO U3 >0 iji ioxco ■«< N00MO i-ICMCMOl co connooiooio O CDCOt~ «OX O CMCOCNCOCN'H ■stqd Qf i auiq; OOOO o CM ONC1 X ^H l-| co i* O CM CO — i Tjl r-l CD X U5 CD >0 C-) TJI Ot^XXO—i CN co r~ >o t>. r~ o o WJCOliflliO COXXOX -r •sn[d igi ani^i XCMCMX O COMlOh CN co O O CM t)i CM CO C1IOCOONN -r o O O O CO C0»O CM X^COCOIOX t^ co owiooiioqi t^ CDC0D5O ■«•»-• CM i-i o I a 4) E CO • • • i-H • . ■ igcsoi _j i-H i-l J, u >>>. ^ i i £ i7r- >^ CO "3 >-5 I CM i-H o ^ cy m 3 — >o CO "3 i o «2 3 .o 5*i a co os — I I I I I ' I -r o 3 ►-5 2*> o"2 CM~ I - ' o O. _• I- >> >> '•i '. i. i L P CJ *• 01 O. -i is J3 c C3 -a ^3 q Et 3 s 1) c I— I o - 3 "c. CJ — - a « 5-3 3 a> f a o 120 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF A3 <» C PC +5 •*~ a 5 a v-. 1 OB CO H u: c» c- 8?> a - » <3J O co pa .g-s •--^ 3 ? 8 0} *— » *fcj CO ~, "o § 8 8cq to fe 8-8 'S S ^ t^ •S s -S3 l£ 05 «a o-) :§ CO * e to £"§ ft *> ft u .© 8 £> 8 e ft. ft. =o 8 H ft V 0 . 1 *- t+i oo 8 t3 'Si 3 3 to g a •joj *3 u 43 CO CO "5. -ja aiqtjqojd Xq paptAip CM O ci OICOMOO OMOUJh COO)0"5 00 •* CD 80 aI 5 3DU3J3JJtQ *-» GO CVJJ o s. so 2* CJ co •soaaiaj COCOOCN ^h lOCN-^t^-lO CO 00 §o -jtp JO SJOJ d r>- oo cd — cm CO flS CQ -J9 aiqBqojj — • CN CM CO CM — "-" >> u t- a o o si — CO ^m CM-HCOOlT)< lO c. — Is < •300313 JJTQ CO CN mCMCMO — OOCO 1 CMO 00 i— i + I CM ' —*—< + + + + + S a 2 o Jo •joj -J3 BjqBqojd OOO'HCD'O CO t~ CM CO CO CM (-. CD CO Xq pspiAip 00 MCOt^'-icO d 30U3J3JJIQ C — , 3 "a o •30U3J3J CO ocm cocor- r^ co —•coco o 00 •* -jtp JO JOJ CO CMin-'jooo o jig tp -J3 ajqBqojj t^ CO CM CO CM CO 1-1 0^3 Q .23 o u C 03 a a T)< CM COCO'* CM o •30U3J3JJIQ CO lococom — lOCi^coco 1 O ^-1 + ++7+^ •euiBJ^s eTqd ^H CMCOCOOO O sns ouidsx9 ■* •& Tfi CM O Is* CM CM ■O B, S J3^Joqs jpv CO co co co co — co ►-• O d 1.1 05 O lO — CM "=HO0CN o a OS > ±* at •ffnjd Qfi 8nn co CMOS OS tOCO CO — lOrfl^ CO ■* QQ T3 o co CMCM CMCM (M CO CMOOOCMiCl i-l •snid ^5^ 3n;i 05 O00 00CMt>- o r^ococ-- d CO CN CO CMCM CM •snrejjs snjd snsoutdszs oo OOOCMiO COCO — CO CM co o •g- js^joqs i(V lO lO-^c^COCM •"f S| o «o B * OCM CM CO iO pH S 03 4J •snid Qfi ann «o OClt^MO mcM — CM CO co 00 >noooj — ■* CO •8rqd iqi 3arq ■^O)- ■* CM V — *CM — — CO •eurejjs en^d snsouidsxa CO CM-* CO-* Moncm — CM .2 ■g ja^joqs [[V CO CM — CM CM — O ■d s *» CO 9 4^ •snjd Qfi sni'j lOt» — CMNi *U5tJIO0CM CM a <* CM ■Bnjd ^5^ 3n;i c CM — CO*CM 00 — cot- ** "5 IC CM >, Li a •a o •c 3 >-5 — < i CD a C5 cr ■•* .J ■ ■ Li 2^ a s i i i -C35 — — H Ej5 '. i '. i. ciChJ on h 3 6 « u C oi£" < ^ or •^ CO co S CO s~ co O SO o co ""■I s <5 co CO g 2 c, S~» co CO rtf ll l£^ CO e co CO o *- s w CO c w § 8 CO . •£CQ S *- ft,,© I. -fe O « ^ co cocH 3 01 la us B a 3 a a a co « a o 3.2 g-g is a "•""IS §a 'C a O. co s o O on •JOJ -19 eiqsqojd Aq papiAtp eonajajjtQ ■aoaajaj -jip jo JOJ -19 ajqtfqojj •aoaajajjtQ CO CI CD CO 00)010 COTt<- IO 00 00—1 OCO-H-H — iC^CNCO cor--«<— i OU5— < I. I ' I C I - -z — OCNOOJ 05 NU5NO oo >n cm — < oi CN CNCDCOO co -r — * -^ro •-H CN CN CI (N O Ol -^OCO o O">i>c»oo co ira—ii-ico I 'ill •JOJ -J3 ajqBqojd Xq paptAtp 90U8 J8JJIQ COtJioouO U5 •-< ifj CO o> CO OfOOlDO CO •HC0OC0U5CN CO COiOO^i-icO O N-HOONCN CO •30U3J9J -Jip JO JOJ -13 aiquqojj M< CO Ol Is" t^comco co co oo >-t CO CM i-i .-I "5 •*!< 00 ■*!< CO O CD a> t^MH i-H co CM co co co CN *OU5O00iO i-h COCNCOCOCMCO •80U3J3rjIQ Tj< »1< CD ts* O "5 "-i CO K5 CN CO CO CN >-i COb» - i CNCN ■ CN I + l I I + o I ON^IH cot^t-.io CNt>- — ICO «* oo oo >-O^-H00 00—1CNCO CN CO CO CO O«5 0)iO CJJCNrHlO CNCNCNrt O Tfl CN ■*OOCOCDCO CO CO O •«*< 05 »H O5O5O5CN00-* i-h CN CN CO CN CO CN O CO CN CN O t- f CD t-OCOOJ CDCN OOPJN00N CO CO CO CN CNCN O CO oi^t^co i-iNHCO CO CN CO CO Oi COCNOIIOCNO ■-I CO fH CN <-- 00 CO CNiO^HUO CO00CO CN-i -H -h t>.CNOrtCDCD r* iom'Oocoo >-i l-H IN l-H CN CN CO 00 IO t~ ^h 00 CN t- CO CN^r»1^5DCN CN CO-H^iCNCNCO o !N o OS CN coco"*—! f IOV* CNCN CNCN •eniBJ^s snnrai snsouidsxa S Ja^Joqs nv co-H>oio IOCNCOCN co^Oco IO00OS-H •HNOiO C-CDUOO ■snuimo^auii oot^r^co iot~t^oo cm mcNcsmcooo co co uo co oi —i oo t* oo coco »o co*o CO Tl< —i t- o ■<*< t>- UO ^)< ^ r-l Is. Tj< -* CD CD CD CD ■"»< "5 t» o CD CMC- 00 00 COMlfO CD*J«iOcO enmmiqizuyi CN00CNO T«CMt^.05 t^ CO 00 00 oo cor»T) ii r- o en co co oo r~ oo t^ r- co CO CO CD C- CO CO ^i oo co t- 'i" t~ irj cm t^ "5 00 00 •& t- CD CD o CO COCNCOO C» CD-«>CNO co r»c-oor- OSTJ ■O 0) o 'p E <-< -9 *> sutBJ^s snntm >nsoui oo — ICNCN--< OS O5C-C0CM •1 OtJICSCC 0> rtMiirt -*m^cM co 00 00 C3 CM 00—ioil^00O3 CM 00 C- t>- 1>- 03 CO CO CN OOCNOOCOCOO oo c- r-< ^ r- r- r» TjicDOOtJ" t-01030 00 00 CO CN oo >o co oo —i co co H < -a o o. 01 a CO Ol "3 1-5 I CM >C3 O^ I. >> >. .CO O ojw»h 3 M-> I co ci ^ bl >1 >1 ft? c a cs-3 « o gSMu 3 CiO*J On h Q 3 o 4> a a§ 3 -5 'TOl Ol"^ '-'-7 --» CN >> o ;s.s '. i '. I. tr«j on 3 o OflJ 122 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF co 1 -« 1 ~ito V Oi ^ CO -B fi K C « £ s »o T3~* e oi © <^ g.« CO co co s 5 ^ o -^ *»^» CO § co o) & CO • 3 5.) CO co © "5 .5 ft. 00 CO M r-i 9 co ecc © ■^* s- c> co -C -c id "tt s s -« , — ^ •*^i o § •St- er- ?^ eo >o e o- ^ CO e *?a CO ^ ^flO CO • ei eg *-. -C» eo O e > 1 CO CO 8 5 CO 3 CO © s "^R o CO g 8 o •gCQ e s~ ©,,© 8^ rS 3 1 8T1 1 V. Q) Ol CO 3 >* sM w 3 -^ ? CI h-l J» o 9 so 3 C ijj .-- I «>*% 3 *> C ■•-> s§ t- >> £~ a o ,<~ a 00 ^ Ec ■-P o a i- a s - cj-3 jQ~ 1 — ' a o .la &« E ■ o O X -ja 8[qi3qojd A"q paptAtp aoua jajjTQ — 'in 00 O 00 O CN W ON^tJIO •aouaaaj -J!P }° -"OJ -ja ajqBqojj •aauajajgiQ oo -h CDC! O CI CN CO t~ 0000^-^0 CO mONOh iOCN " Wt3 O 5.2 s ^ =3 -3 O 3 T3 *^ T3 +J •aouajaj -;ip jo joi -ja aiqcqojj •aonajajjiQ —loo h- ClTt*-* 3SCN O COf^lN lOCO CO 1O1OO00CN 1-1© coco CN CO CO CO CO >o 00 MOmON CO00 00C5Tl< CO -^ CO CO CO CN 00 CN OMO!Ot(( O CNOOOliOcN t>- 00t^ I COCN i-H 1-iCN ' CO ■& I II II snsouidsxs ■S- Ja^Joqs HV snmuio^aui'j tl>CO —iCN coco 00 NMOON CN COOCOOOCN CO COCOCNCNCO ON C^ICO OJ lO COO »C CN CD CO 005COCOCD ■*Tt«COiOCO CO CO CO CN i-h smntu2,SZ,3un N o m en cn a> O O CDCO O »0 CO ■* -H 10 CO -H CN CN CN CO CO CO suibj^s snuim snsouidsxa ■g ja^joqs nv COCO -*o COt)< lO CItJiiOwo LO •<)< >o CO CO ^ snnuuof-zaui'l •smiiui^g^auri •sarej^s snuiui snsouidsxa S aa^oqs nV ^o coco t^cO lO lO iO ^ IM tm COCO co ro- coco O ■* t» t>- "O CN t^ COCN COCO— 1 t>- t-COTf'OCO OCNOOCO COOit^COCO CN iHi-trH 'snnTiuo^iaun tj«co coco CN — it^co-n cococoo>o snuira^g^auiq ■a o lOCO CO moo oo t^ooco-H io CO 03 C3) CO OS WJ - oi*i ci rj M 3 3 a? a> ft O O Cl C; N N lO >-< CN COCNCOCO rH CN CO co o co CN I — i uo io i— ( •'f -o CN •o CO >o CN CD 1/5 o oo CO CD CN ft < I CD g'co A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 123 general trend is very nearly that of a straight line. This general form constitutes intrinsic evidence of the reliability of the curves as a whole. The curve for Line 757 plus (figure 15) starts higher than the level attained by the Line 740 plus strain for the same period. This is probably significant. The two-month period curve for the Line 757 plus strain held very closely to a level near 800 seconds for the first 9 months of selection. The curve for the plus strain of Line 740, while prevailingly at a lower level for these periods, fluctuated from 672 seconds to 876 seconds. The mean difference between the plus strains of Lines 757 and 740 for this nine-month period is 39 ±12.36 seconds, 3.15 times the probable error. Hence there is evidence that at the start the plus strain of Line 757 was less re- active than the plus strain of Line 740. During the first 31 months (to February 1915) of selection with Line 757 the plus strain in general had a higher reaction-time than the plus strain of Line 740 (table 48 and figure 15), which tends to strengthen one's conviction that at the start the plus strain of Line 757 was less reactive than the plus strain of Line 740. But from February 1915 the fairly consistent differences between the plus strains of Lines 757 and 740 are striking and indicate that the plus strain of Line 757 had become the more reactive of the two. Of 14 two-month periods the plus strain of Line 740 was the more reactive only twice. One of these differences is slight (16 ±41.5 seconds), the other is large (246.6 ±34.2 seconds); but this difference arises from the coincidence of an exceptionally low average for Line 740 plus (the lowest, by 104 seconds, of any two-month average for this strain) and an exceptionally high average for Line 757 plus.1 Aver- ages by two-month periods are obtained from too few individual reaction-time records to be highly reliable when considered singly, so, while this difference is large, it must be considered in relation to the other averages and evaluated accordingly. For the other 12 two-month periods of the latter half of the experiment with those two lines, the plus strain of Line 757 was the more reactive as com- pared with the plus strain of Line 740; the differences were from 22 to 240 seconds, and were respectively 3.6, 1.0, 0.7, 9.2, 1.6, 2.7, 3.1, 2.6, 1.7, 3.7, 1.4, and 6.4 times their probable errors (see table 45). That is to say, even when considered by shorter (two-month) periods, 12 of 14 differences indicate that the plus strain of Line 757 was more reactive than the plus strain of Line 740, although, with their large probable errors due to relatively small numbers, only 7 of these differences are statistically significant. xThe mean for the December 1916— January 1917 period for the plus strain of Line 757 was obtained from the reaction-time records of only 36 individuals of 3 broods. The corre- sponding mean for the 740 plus strain resulted from 41 individual reaction-time records. These numbers are scarcely more than half the usual numbers for two-month periods. 124 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF Considered by longer periods, it is found that during the first (9 months) and second (12 months) longer periods of the experiment the plus strain of Line 757 was less reactive than the Line 740 pus strain by 39. 0± 12.36 seconds and 86.6± 13.11 seconds, differences of statistical value, 3.15 and 6.6 times the probable errors. During the following year the plus strain of Line 757 became the more re- active, though the difference for the entire year-period was only 37 ±13.61 seconds, or 2.76 times the probable error. During the next year, August 1915- July 1916, the difference is 116.4 ±13.67 seconds, 8.51 times the probable error — the plus strain of Line 757 being the more reactive. The averages for the final nine- month period of selection differ by 1.9 ±15.89 seconds, the plus strain of Line 740 having the lower reaction-time. This on its face distinctly controverts the existence of a significant difference in reactiveness between the plus strains of lines 757 and 740. But, as already noted, in one two-month period during this longer period there was an exceptionally low average for the plus strain of Line 740 and an exceptionally high average for the plus strain of Line 757, and the striking influence of these two aberrant averages pro- duces the difference noted above, a difference which is quite out of line with the general behavior for the latter part of this experiment of the two strains concerned. The curves for Lines 740 and 757 by six-month periods (figure 19) show the plus strain of Line 757 the less reactive until the May- October 1915 periods, from which time the 757 plus strain is shown the more reactive for the remainder of the experiment. The ex- ceptional reaction-time periods (December 1916-January 1917) for the two strains compared serve to cause the curves to approach for the last six-month period, but the plus strain of Line 757 maintains the lower level. Hence it is seen that, whereas on the start the plus strain of Line 757 was fundamentally less reactive than the plus strain of Line 740, during the latter half (nearly) of the experiment there is fairly conclusive evidence that the plus strain of Line 757 was more reactive than the plus strain of Line 740, which may fairly be con- sidered as a check, since it was subjected to the same treatment as Line 757 and throughout a contemporaneous period of time. Comparing the mean reaction-times by two-month periods for the plus strain of Line 757 with the means for the plus strains of the remaining lines of S. exspinosus subjected to selection, Lines 794, 795, and 796, the result is still more suggestive of a changed reactive- ness of the plus strain of Line 757. The remaining 3 lines are lumped in this comparison, a procedure justified only in the interest of brevity and the securing of less fluctuating averages. The plus strain of Line 757 was less reactive than the combined plus strains of Lines 794, 795, and 796 in only 3 out of 15 two-month periods, the A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 125 means for Line 757 plus being exceptionally high, in each of these periods. For the other 12 periods Line 757 plus was the more re- active, the differences varying from 25 to 269 seconds and being 4.1, 1.1, 1.8, 5.1, 14.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.6, 3.1, 9.3, 5.6, and 8.1 times the large statistical probable errors (table 48). Considered by longer periods, it is seen (table 48) that the differences are -5.1 ±13.97 seconds, +123.1 ±10.24 seconds, and +89.5 ±13.86 seconds, the plus sign indicating greater reactiveness on the part of the plus strain of Line 757. Reference to figure 18a, which shows the re- action-time curves for Line 757 and combined reaction-time curves for all other S. exspinosus lines, Lines 740 (in part), 794, 795, and 796, shows clearly to what extent the mean reaction-time for the plus strain of Line 757 is prevailingly lower than the combined means for all the other S. exspinosus plus strains. These curves show at a glance that the plus strain of Line 757 was essentially lower in its reaction-time than the other plus strains of the same species. The 3 two-month periods in which the reverse exists are there seen in their true light — as exceptionally high points in the reaction-time curve for 757 plus. Thus, from examination of the data for mean reaction-times for contemporaneous periods, it is found that during the latter half of the experiment the plus strain of Line 757 is more reactive than the plus strains of the other S. exspinosus lines. That this is a result of selection is indicated by the fact that in the beginning of the experiments both strains of Line 757 were appreciably less reactive than the two strains of Line 740, with which Line 757 may fairly be compared. Comparison of the reaction-time means for the minus strain of Line 757 with the 740 minus strain (table 49 and figures 15 and 19) shows at once that the minus strain of Line 757 was from the be- ginning the less reactive of the two, and that as the experiment progressed the difference in reactiveness between the minus strains of the two lines increased until at the close of the experiment the divergence was fairly large.1 Of 27 two-month periods the minus strain of Line 757 had a lower reaction-time than Line 740 minus only 2 times, a remarkable uniformity of differences when the irregularities of the curves are considered. Of the 25 times when the minus strain of Line 757 was the less reactive, the differences were of statistical value 18 times, being 4.5, 5.1, 3.4, 10.1, 3.0, 5.7, 11.5, 6.5, 7.2, 3.3, 12.8, 9.7, 6.5, 4.4, 5.4, 5.7, 8.6, and 12.3 times their probable errors (see table 49). Seven of the differences by shorter periods and the 2 differences in the reverse direction were not of statistical significance. Considered by longer periods, the mean xAs is general, when comparing reaction-time means of two strains for contemporaneous periods, there is seen an obvious rough parallelism between the two curves; but the uniformity with which these two curves parallel each other is rather exceptional. 126 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF differences were 77, 126, 99, 170, and 230 seconds. The difference for the middle period is influenced by the exceptionally low means for the Line 757 minus strain during 2 two-month periods. Other- wise the divergence consistently increased. When the minus strain of 757 is compared with the shorter S. exspinosus lines (Lines 794, 795, and 796) the divergence between the minus strain of Line 757 and the minus strains of other lines which may serve as checks is even more marked (table 49 and figure 18b). The minus strain of Line 757 had a higher average than the combined averages for the minus strains of Lines 794, 795, 796 in 14 of 15 two- month periods, the differences ranging from 51 to 319 seconds and all but two of them being from 4 to 13 times their probable errors. The one exceptional difference was a difference of only 1.1 seconds. Conclusion Regarding Effect of Selection in Line 757. It is seen, then, in Line 757, that by all the tests applied and in spite of all the safeguards used in connection with these data, a marked effect of selection is indicated. This is shown by the course of the curves plotting the mean reaction-times of the two strains; by a progressively increased (though somewhat irregular and once inter- rupted) difference in mean reaction-time between the two strains, the plus strain having the lower reaction-time; by a decrease to 94 seconds in the average minimum reaction-time of the plus strain as compared with a decrease to 245 seconds in the minus strain; by a decrease of approximately one-third in the average maximum reac- tion-time in the plus strain,1 while at the same time the minus strain decreased only 5 per cent; by a decrease of four-fifths in the number of individuals of the plus strain which failed to respond to the light, while the decrease in this number in the minus strain was only one- third; by the results of the two test series applied to the strains of this line; by the data for the same-day broods; by every statistical test which was applied to the data; by a comparison with similarly treated strains of other lines of the same species; and, to the eyes of the observer, most of all by the greatly changed behavior in the experimental tank of the plus strain as compared with that of the minus strain. There seems no escape from the conclusion that in Line 757 there is a marked effect of selection. This effect appeared in the early period of the experiment and with some fluctuation increased throughout its duration. The form of the curves would seem to indicate that the effect of selection was continuous and was still 1 This decrease in the maximum reaction-time means more than a decrease of one-third suggests. At the beginning of selection with Line 757 some broods were left in the experimental tank for an hour or more, and those individuals which did not respond to the light within the period allotted for the experiment (15 minutes) often did not move at all within the much longer period. It seems probable that the maximum reaction-times for this early period might readily have been near 3,600, or even 10,800 seconds in many cases, if each of the selection tests had been continued for an hour or 3 hours. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 127 cumulative at the close of the experiment. The divergence in mem reaction-times is neither controlled nor noticeably influenced by the relative vigor of the two strains, nor does it appear to be explicable on any other grounds than as a divergence coming about through selection. It is to be regretted that no return selection was attempted with Line 757. The selection experiments were very laborious, and at the time when it was decided that they had been carried far enough, there did not seem sufficient justification for prolonging the experiment. Though it was then realized that the two strains of Line 757 were pronouncedly different in their reactiveness to light, the full significance of this difference, particularly as involving a changed reactiveness in both strains of Line 757 as compared with the corresponding strains of the other S. exspinosus lines, was not brought out until months later, when the extensive data were fully worked over. Time was not then available for again taking up the selection experiment. A further fact of importance is that the effect of selection was permanent, or at any rate persisted, through a long series of genera- tions. In December 1919 (32 months after selection had been dis- continued) the selective effect still persisted and probably to as marked a degree as at the termination of selection. The two strains, meantime, had been propagated for 112 generations without any regard to their past history. The persistence of the effect of selection was demonstrated by testing a large number of broods of both strains. In extremely few cases did a brood of the plus strain fail to show more reactiveness to light than the corresponding brood of the minus strain, while in most cases the broods of the plus strain were markedly the more reactive. 128 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AS AFFECTING REACTION- TIME AND VIGOR OF STOCK. Any relation between environmental influences and reactive- ness to light is a fact of general biological significance and is a matter of importance in the present connection. In the light tests with Cladocera little-understood environmental influences were important factors in influencing reaction-time in all three species which were subjected to selection. These environmental influences are dis- cussed under the following heads: (1) temperature influences; (2) influences of exhaled substances from the observer's breath; (3) relatively temporary chemical (?) differences in the water used in the experimental tank; (4) occurrence of negatively reacting indi- viduals; (5) general influences operative through longer periods of time; (6) influence of vigor. 1. Temperature Influences. The temperature of the water in the experimental tank was a minor factor influencing reaction-time. This influence was not marked enough to be evident to the observer in the tests day by day, but the somewhat lower reaction means during the winter periods indicate and correlation between temperature and reaction- time demonstrates that lower temperatures are to some extent associated with greater reactiveness and a lower reaction-time mean. The temperature of the water in which the animals were tested was always near that of the basement room in which the tests were conducted. Fortunately this room was less affected by fluctuations in summer temperatures than the remainder of the building, but in winter temperatures ran fairly low, —10° to 15° C, inasmuch as this room was not provided with much artificial heat. Correlations between individual reaction-times (50-second classes) and temperature (0.5° C. classes) of the water for all the tested individuals of strains of D. pulex cover the following periods and give the following values : No. of No. of Time period. tested young. r E r/EF Time period. tested young. r £"" r/E? Apr. 1914 194 + 0.0071 0 . 0484 0.15 Feb. 1915... 292 +0.0142 0.0395 0.36 May 1914 317 - .2107 .0362 5.82 Mar. 1915. . 347 - .0532 .0361 1.47 June 1914 175 - .0019 .0510 0.04 (Summer) July 1914 197 - . 0009 .0481 0.02 Apr. -Sept. Aug. 1914 205 + .1238 .0464 2.67 1914 1,474 - .0193 .0175 1.10 Sept. 1914 386 — .2482 .0322 7.70 (Winter) Oct. 1914 385 + . 2742 .0318 8.62 Oct. 1914- Nov. 1914 438 + . 0693 .0321 2.16 Mar. 1915. 2,025 + . 0442 .0150 2.95 Dec. 1914 301 + .0851 .0386 2.20 (Year) Jan. 1915 262 + .0969 .0413 2.35 Apr. 1914- Mar. 1915. 3,499 + .1369 .0112 12.22 A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 129 These correlations are small and of those for single month-periods only three or four can be credited with statistical value, those for the May, August, September, and October 1914 periods. Two of these are positive and two are negative correlations. Five of the correla- tions from March to September are negative and two of these are significant, both in numerical value and in comparison with their probable errors. One of the two positive correlations for the spring and summer period is very small, but the other is larger and of possible significance. The correlations for October-February are all positive, but only one is significant. The correlation for the six- month spring and summer period is -0.0193 ±0.0175; that for the six-month winter period is +0.0442 ±0.0150. These very limited data suggest that negative correlations are possibly general for the spring and summer months, while positive correlations are general for the late fall and winter months. The correlation for the year April 1914-March 1915, while only +0.1369, is 12.2 times its prob- able error. These data cover the year-period of most consistent shifts in the composite reaction-time curves for the D. pulcx strains (figure 10d) and probably show the changes in reaction-time associated with season and temperature at its maximum for D. pulex. Correlations between temperature and reaction-time for S. exspinosus were confined to separate correlations for the strains of Line 757 covering in each case the selection data for 19 months from October 1915 to April 1917, the period during which occurred the greatest differences in reaction-time between the two strains. The correlations were, for the plus strain (689 individuals), +0.2428 ±0.0242 and for the minus strain (683 individuals), +0.2363 ±0.0244. Each value is large enough to have a real meaning and is approximately 10 times its probable error. Hence there is shown for both species, and particularly for S. exspinosus, Line 757, some significant correlation between reaction- time and the temperature of the water in the experimental tank. It is a question how much of this correlation, if any, represents a real direct temperature influence. If the temperature influence were direct, one would perhaps expect within the limited range of tempera- ture occurring in the tests that higher temperatures would be asso- ciated with greater reactiveness and a lowered mean reaction-time, which would be indicated by negative correlations. Since the significant correlations are mostly positive, higher temperatures tend to be associated with less reactiveness and a higher reaction-time. It is possible that the lowered reactiveness with higher tempera- tures is really due to reduced oxygen in the water used in the experi- mental tank. The water, when brought in the day it was to be used, was always at a lower temperature than the experimental room. As it warmed up, the excess gas in solution appeared as bubble?. The 130 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF water was ordinarily used soon after it reached approximately the room temperature; hence it was probably near saturation for the principal gases which had been thrown out of solution. Whether the gases retained in solution were equally oxygen and other gases would of course depend upon the actual amounts of individual gases within the water when taken from the pond. Assuming that the pond-water was ordinarily near saturation for oxygen when brought into the laboratory, after it had given up a portion of its contained gases (as it always did) it would presumably be saturated for oxygen. Since the amount of oxygen at saturation at 25° C. is about 26 per cent less than at 10° C, this is a basis for the suggestion of an ex- planation for the greater reactiveness at the lower temperatures. No specific tests have been made to determine if this is the correct interpretation, and the results of the summer correlations for D. pulex do not fit in with this explanation. There is also the possibility that temperature influenced reaction- time indirectly through its effect upon the food in the culture-water. The water used as culture-water went through the changes in tem- perature (and chemical constitutents) to which a shallow out-door pond is subject in the climate of Cold Spring Harbor and the develop- ment of the protista upon which the Cladocera feed is naturally influenced by temperature as well as other environmental factors. Before being used the culture-water (during its successive strainings) was kept for approximately 6 days indoors in jars surrounded by running water. The temperature of this running water varied with out-door temperatures, but was much less extreme. Hence there is also room for the assumption of influences of temperature upon the Cladocera stock, not directly as a temperature influence per se, but indirectly through the culture medium, which is a veritable micro- cosm. 2. Influence of Substances Exhaled from Observer's Breath. That the amount of carbon dioxide was actually an important factor in influencing reaction-time is suggested by the fact that if several broods were tested successively in the experimental tank without change of water the later broods reacted markedly less promptly than the ones tested in the same water an hour earlier.2 The young Cladocera are so small as to be just visible in the illumina- tion in the experimental tank, so that one must get the eyes at about reading distance from the water of the tank in order to observe the young animals. As a consequence, the exhaled air very largely 1 The spring water is known to contain relatively a large amount of CO2. 2 This was observed a number of times, after which the plan of frequently changing the water in the experimental tank was adopted to obviate this disturbing influence. It seemed impracticable to change the water oftener than after testing each four broods, although it was sometimes noted that the last brood or two of the four tested between changes of water was less reactive than broods tested just after the change. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 131 struck the surface of the water. These differences in reactiveness were not due to temperature differences, since they occurred in cases where there were no temperature differences in the water. It is assumed that this difference in reactiveness was due to the accumu- lation of carbon dioxide from the observer's breath in the water contained in the tank, though exhaled volatile organic substances may have been wholly or partially responsible. 3. Relatively Temporary Chemical Differences in Water used in Experimental Tank. Probably the environmental factor of greatest importance con- sisted in differences in the chemical content of the water used in the experimental tank, although this water was always obtained from the same pond and handled in the same fashion. Such chemical differ- ences in the water would account for the pecularities in reaction-time which were so apparent in the reactions of all the broods tested on certain days. Not infrequently, between successive days or be- tween periods of a few days' duration, considerable difference was noted in the general reactiveness of the stock as a whole. On one day the individuals tested would react fairly promptly, while on the following day they might react conspicuously less promptly. This clearly points to environmental influences operative temporarily but pronouncedly. These temporary differences in reactiveness, pre- sumably due to differences in the water, are well illustrated in table 2 (page 18), showing in abbreviated form the data for the broods of Line 695, tested on August 29, 30, and 31, 1913.1 The data given in table 2 present an extreme case selected to show the environmental influence upon reaction-time (and upon the occurrence of negatively reacting individuals) at its maximum. The averages for the data for the two strains of Line 695 for the 3 days shown in table 2 are 401, 636, and 398 seconds, based upon 87, 190, and 50 individual reaction-times. The mean for the second of these days is 235 seconds or 58.6 per cent greater than that for the first day and 238 seconds or 59.8 per cent greater than that for the third day. The standard deviations and probable errors for these means were not determined, but obviously (from other experience in deter- mining probable errors with such data) these differences are of large statistical value. As already noted, this is an extreme case (and it is doubtful if many as extreme could be found in any portion of the later data), but the factor operative here presumably was also operative to some extent in many of the tests conducted in making 1 These data were obtained with due regard to the necessity for changing the water in the experimental tank at frequent intervals and they fit the requirements of the present purpose very well. They are part of the data of the first test series conducted. As a test series this was not satisfactory, as the numbers of individuals in the corresponding plus and minus broods were not as nearly exactly the same as in later test series. Also, the broods were not always paired here, i. e., in the usual course a plus brood was always tested just before or immediately after a minus brood of the same age and containing the same number (within one or two) of individuals. 132 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF selections; but this effect was probably the same with all the indi- viduals of the plus and minus strains and could not have interfered with the choosing of the proper individuals or affected the experiment as a whole, except that it added to the irregularity of the reaction- time records. If, however, this disturbing influence did sometimes prevent the making of the proper selections, that would only render the selections less effective and would not confuse any results ob- tained. 4. Occurrence of Negatively Reacting Individuals. The data shown in table 2 also serve to illustrate the irregular occurrence of negatively reacting individuals. There were 3 negative ones of a total of 87 individuals, or 3.5 per cent, August 29; 3 out of 190, or 1.6 per cent, August 30; and 14 of 50, or 28 per cent, August 31. While these numbers are not large, the widely differing percentages indicate very well the relatively spasmodic occurrence of negatively reacting individuals on August 31 (see also page 15). There is great irregularity in the occurrence of negatively reacting individuals in general, so that while the illustration taken from table 2 is somehwat extreme, it is not unique.1 These illustrations, (1) to (4), bring to notice relatively tempo- rary disturbing factors which are a matter of concern, but for which no way of complete elimination was found; yet they do not serve to discount the selection data as a whole. This is clear for two reasons : (1) these factors, which in the long run presumably must have affected the plus and minus strains in a similar way, could not often have interfered with making the proper selections and could contribute only to the fluctuations in reaction- time ; (2) the consistent and con- vincing results with Line 757 could not have come about if these dis- turbing factors had seriously interfered with the course of the selec- tion experiment as a whole. 5. General Influences Operative Through Longer Periods of Time. The general relation between mean reaction-time and environ- mental conditions is obvious in the curves plotting mean reaction- times by two-month periods. This relation is seen in that reaction- time curves for the plus and minus strains of the same line in a general way move upward and downward together to some extent and at times the nearly coincidental courses of the curves for the two strains are very striking. This was not due to any large extent to tempera- ture differences in the water used in the experimental tank, although temperature differences in this water were sometimes a factor (see pages 128-130). Temperature influences fail to explain many of the broad fluctuations of the reaction-time curves, e. g., the high levels obtaining for the curves for D. pulex (figure 10d) during December xIt chances in this case that the lowest percentage of negatively reacting individuals falls upon the day of highest mean reaction-time. This is a mere coincidence. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 133 1913-March 1914, a winter period during which relatively low levels are generally seen. It is not difficult to believe that these environmental factors may have been in part chemical differences in the pond-water, gradual changes in carbon-dioxide or oxygen content, or other chemical differences, since the effects observed are operative through longer periods of time than the temporary environmental effects already considered. Such gradual changes in the water of a pond are well known, and the water used for culture-water and in the experimental tank during these tests was pond- water. We know nothing about the precise specific character of the changes involved in the present case. Coincident Changes in Reactiveness. The curves for Line 695 (figure 2c) show these general environ- mental effects to a marked degree, particularly in the relatively low levels of the curves for October 1912-November 1913 and in the higher level from December 1913-September 1914. The general coincidence of level of the two curves does not end here, but it is not so marked through the later course of the experiment because of the relatively wide fluctuations of the curve for the minus strain. The correlation between the mean reaction-times of the plus and minus strains of this line by two-month periods is 0.4962 ±0.0979. With Line 689 (figure 3c) the environmental effect is observable throughout the course of the curves. In Line 691 (figure 4), while the curve for the minus strain is quite irregular, the general course of the curves is very similar. The same may be said for Line 711 (figure 5). In Line 713 (figure 6), in spite of the very irregular curve for the plus strain, the curves in general follow each other remark- ably closely. The correlation for the two strains of this line is 0.6982 ±0.0773. With Line 714 (figure 7c) the curves are unusually irregular for strains of Daphnia pulex, yet the environmental influence is obvious from the general course of the curves. The correlation is 0.5027 ±0.0971. In Line 719 (figure 8c), again, the curve for the plus strain is very irregular, yet the general coincidence of the curves is obvious. Line 751 (figure 9) shows the same general coincidence of the curves. This line, within which selection was begun in November 1912, is the only D. pulex line with which selection was begun later than March 1912. It is interesting to note that the curves for this line start at virtually the same level as was attained by the other D. pulex strains during the same two-month period (December 1912- January 1913) and closely follow the composite curves for the other D. pulex strains (see figure 10d). The curves (figure 10, a and b) for the relatively short exper- iments with Lines 762 and 766, both Daphnia longispina, show the same general indication of a parallel effect of environment upon the 134 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF mean reaction-times of the plus and minus strains. Likewise, with the other D. longispina line, Line 768, the curves (figure 10c) for the two strains, despite irregularities, follow the same general course. With the S. exspinosus material the general influence of environ- ment upon the mean reaction-times of the two strains of the same line is less conspicuous than with the lines of the two species of Daphnia, but it is evident in most of the curves and is particularly clear for the curves for the final several months of the experiments. The curves for Line 794 (figure lie) show this influence to a marked degree, in spite of the irregular portions of the curve for the minus strain. Because of the unusually irregular curve in Line 795 (figure 12c), the environmental influence is less in evidence, but there probably is a small positive correlation between the reaction- time means for the two strains by the two-month periods of the experiment. In Line 796 (figure 13c) the curves follow each other in a general way. With Line 740 (figure 15) the curves on the whole follow each other to a remarkable degree. A clearer demonstration of the effect of environmental influence working through relatively long periods would be hard to find. The correlation between the mean reac- tion-times for the plus and minus strain by two-month periods is 0.6437 ±0.0733. The relatively shorter range of the up-and-down movements of the curves for this line renders this correlation smaller than one would otherwise expect from the relatively close parallelism of the two curves, but, considering the limited num- ber of terms involved in the correlation, it is very large. In Line 757 (figure 18b) the environmental effect is somewhat in evidence in the courses of the two curves, but naturally it is obscured by the marked effect of selection, particularly during the last 21 months of the experiment; yet, even in this latter period, in spite of the wide divergence of the curves, there is an evident rela- tion between the two which seems intelligible only as an effect of environmental influence. The correlation for the reaction-time means for the two strains is 0.4283 ±0.1041. A composite curve plotting the mean reaction-times for all the plus strains and another for all the minus strains of D. pulex is shown in figure 10d. The courses of the curves for the strains of any single D. pulex line, despite irregularities, strikingly resemble the corre- sponding portions of this composite curve. Likewise, the few re- action-time curves for strains of D. longispina (see figure 10, a, b, and c) to some extent follow the same course as the composite re- action-time curve (figure 10d) for the D. pulex strains. A composite curve of the reaction-time means for all the plus strains and one for all the minus strains of S. exspinosus (except Line 757) is shown in figure 18b. The environmental influence is well shown in the generally fairly coincidental courses of the two curves, A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 1 .';."> and, as with the lines of D. pulex, there is a striking resemblance between the curves for any one of the strains and the composite curve for all the corresponding strains of S. exspinosus. There is some tendency for the composite reaction-time curves for strains of D. pulex to follow the same course as the curves for S. exspinosus, but this is seen to a limited extent and in only a few places, such as in a general rise for both species for June-July 1913 (figures 10d and 15) and in a general rise followed by a pronounced drop in the period from April to November 1915 (figures 10d and 18). While in general the physiology of these two species is much the same, there are still such specific physiological differences that any coinci- dental changes in reaction-times bespeak pronounced contempo- raneous effects of environment. Seasonal Changes in Reactiveness. There is some tendency observable in the reaction-time curves for a drop in the curves, indicating greater reactiveness during the winter than the summer months. The composite curves for the D. pulex lines (figure 10d) in general show lower portions of the curves for the October-March periods, but this does not hold for the winter period for 1913-1914. Seasonal changes are seen to some extent for the winter and summer periods in the composite reaction-time curves for the S. exspinosus lines (figure 18b) and in the six-month curves for Lines 740 and 757 (figure 19). The seasonal (winter and summer) differences are possibly due largely to temperature influences, but there is no certainty that this seasonal shift is due to temperature alone or even to temperature as indirectly working through the oxygen or other content of the water used in the experimental tank and through the culture medium, yet it seems probable that these influences may be a large factor in these seasonal effects. Contemporaneous Shifts in Reaction-Time Means. Contemporaneous shifts in the reaction-time curves for the strains of different lines of the same species are seen. There are a few shorter time-periods in the data for which there are really re- markable contemporaneous changes in the curves for the different strains of the same species. For the August-September 1912 period the 14 D. pulex strains, with two exceptions, showed drops in the reaction-time curves. All but one of these drops were considerable in extent. The two strains which did not show drops in this period and the one which showed a slight drop in this period showed pro- found drops in the next two-month period, while most of the strains showed further drops in this later two-month period. Temperature influences1 were not the factors determining these drops in the 1 Temperature is referred to frequently because the data include temperature records, whil 3 for the other environmental factors no definite measurements are available. 136 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF curves. In general, the temperature of the water in the experimental tank was very much the same for August-September 1912 as for June-July preceding. It is interesting to note that this August- September period, because of poor food conditions, was a period of great difficulty in maintaining our stock; mortality was high; most broods were excessively small, usually 1 to 3 individuals; and sterility was relatively common. Yet this is one of the periods of the greatest drops in the curves (decrease in reaction-time) which occurred at any part of the experiment with D. pulex. A second interesting contemporaneous change in the reaction- time curves was a marked rise for all of the ten strains of D. pulex for December 1913 to January 1914. Though the temperatures were somewhat lower for this period than for the preceding period, it should be noted that the reaction-time curves for D. pulex strains remained very close to this high level for 8 months, namely, from December 1913 to July 1914 (from early winter to midsummer). Hence it seems impossible to attribute this fluctuation in the D. pulex curves for the December 1913-January 1914 period to tem- perature influences. Another local drop is seen in every one of the 10 curves for S. exspinosus strains for the February-March 1915 period. This drop is very large for 5 of these strains. Temperatures for this two- month period were in general slightly lower than during the preceding and succeeding periods, but as compared with other periods these are comparatively slight temperature differences and the drops in the curves can not be considerd primarily, if at all, due to the slight temperature differences between these two periods. It is worthy of note that the contemporaneous shift in the re- action-time curves affecting every one of the 10 strains of D. pulex for December 1913-January 1914 period is not markedly reflected in the 4 S. exspinosus strains (see figures 15 and 18b) and that the profound drop in the curves for strains of Simocephalus for the last period mentioned above is not in evidence for the strains of D. pulex. This in itself would seem to indicate clearly enough that the effect is not due to temperature influences per se.1 One might be tempted to assume that the first and third of these profound shifts in the reaction-time curves were due to some improvement in Cladocera stock due to favorable laboratory condi- tions, inasmuch as the first appears after 4 months of selection in the D. pulex lines and the third after 2 months of selection in 3 of the S. exspinosus lines, except for the facts that (1) the D. pulex lines had been under laboratory conditions for 33^ months before selection began and hence a total of 7% months before these drops occurred, and further, that they did not maintain these lower levels; (2) that 1 The lack of contemporaneous shifts in the curves for strains of D. pulex and strains of the D. pulex stock, but it scarcely affected the two S. exspinosus strains (figures 14a and 17c).1 During August-September 1913 all the D. pulex strains and all the S. exspinosus strains show relatively high reproductive indices. Again, for October-November 1914 all the strains of D. pulex and 2 (of 4) strains of S. exspinosus have high reproductive indices. These are particularly marked for the D. pulex strains. For the period immediately following, December-January 1915, most of the strains of both species show considerably lowered though not particu- larly small reproductive indices (figures lc, 7a, 8a, 11a, 12a, 13a, 14a, and 17c). In October-November 1915 all the 4 strains of S. exspino- sus and 3 of the 4 strains of D. pulex have high reproductive indices. Still other periods of more or less coincident fluctuations in repro- ductive indices may be seen in the curves. Mean reproductive indices for all the D. pulex strains and for all the S. exspinosus strains were determined, and it was found that the coincident high and low points in reproductive index as given above were clearly reflected in these means. These fluctuations in reproductive indices are in two cases (August-November 1912 and June-July 1913) clearly related to poor food, and perhaps to other unfavorable conditions, and it is believed the other coincident fluctuations are likewise associated with environmental factors. Independent Fluctuations in Vigor. Vigor is closely related to environmental conditions and many coincident fluctuations in vigor have just been referred to; but be- cause of the necessarily somewhat differential treatment (see page 140) of the two strains of the same line (and of the different lines), inde- pendent fluctuations are much in evidence in the figures showing reproductive index (figures lc, 3a, 7a, 8a, 11a, 12a, 13a, 14a, and 17c). For example, in figure 17c, showing reproductive indices for the two strains of Line 757, conspicuous instances in which the changes in reproductive index for the two strains of this line are in reverse directions (as compared with the preceding period) are seen in the February-March 1914, August-September 1916, October-Novem- ber 1916, and February-March 1917 periods. Six other less con- spicuous fluctuations (in reverse directions) are seen in this same figure. Some of these small fluctuations are probably due to the reproductive indices for the two-month period, having been derived from a relatively small amount of data; but this is not believed to be the case in general and can scarcely be assumed to account for 1 It has been found in other observations that while the physiology of these two species of Cladocera is fundamentally very similar, yet physiological differences not infrequently appear. The lack of a pronounced lowering of the reproductive indices for the two S. exspinosus lines for this period is an illustration of these physiological differences between the two species. 146 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF the wide fluctuations in the four periods enumerated above; cer- tainly it is not true for consistent differences in reproductive index between the two strains of a species for several months in succession, such as are seen in four different periods for Line 757 (figures 17c and 18a) and in parts of the data for nearly every line for which reproductive indices are given. Such independent fluctuations are believed to be due to the somewhat differential treatment resulting from the transfer of young of the two strains of a line on different days and into culture-water of different collections. The cumulative effect of continued trans- fers into somewhat different culture media seems very readily to account for local differences in reproductive vigor between the two strains of a line. Some of these independent fluctuations are capable of explana- tion as due to variations in an internal cycle which most workers believe exists in Cladocera. But differences in environmental con- ditions explain these cases so readily, some of the contemporaneous changes are associated with recognized changes in environmental conditions, and it is well known that such culture media do have great variation, so that any assumption of an internal cycle seems quite unnecessary. Further, in Line 689 (figure 3a and b) the plus strain, which had much the higher reproductive index for the first two months of selection, had a considerably lower reproductive index for the following 2 months. This would seem a short time for the internal cycles of these two sister strains to have diverged. The minus strain of Line 714 (figure 7, a and b) had a reproductive index nearly three times as large as that for the plus strain for the first two-month period. Can these strains just derived from the same individual have immediately passed into different periods of an internal cycle? There are other cases (less striking, however) of significantly different reproductive indices immediately or very soon after the origin of related strains. However, in spite of the unavoidably somewhat dissimilar treat- ment of the two strains of a line and the consequent local differential changes in reproductive indices, there is in general a very close correlation between the reproductive indices of kindred strains, a result to be ascribed, in large part at least, to the general influence of similar environmental conditions. Differences between Reproductive Indices during Different Parts of Experiment. The reproductive indices for the two strains of the different lines in general differed somewhat less at the beginning of selection (for the first 4 months), when the two strains had just been separated, than during the later parts of the experiment, after the two strains had been separate for considerable periods of time (figures lc, 3a, 7a, 8a, 11a, 12a, 13a, 14a, and 17c). This is explainable as due to A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 147 the fact of the identity of environmental conditions before selection was begun and the diversity of environmental conditions as affecting the two strains later (or as due to their being in different portions of their cycles at the same time later). However, some of the strains, e. g., Lines 695 and 689, on the whole show greater differences in reproductive indices during the first 4 months than later (see figures lc and 3a). Is the Increased Reactiveness for Lines op S. exspinosus Associated with Increased Vigor? In view of the increase in reactiveness in the S. exspinosus lines during the course of the experiments, it is of interest to examine the reproductive indices to see if similar or other changes are seen in them. With the 4 lines of Daphnia pulex (Lines 689, 695, 714, and 719) for which reproductive indices are worked out, there are in general reproductive indices somewhat below the average for the first 2 two-month periods, very low reproductive indices for the following 2 periods (during the obviously poor food conditions), and there- after the reproductive indices are somewhat fluctuating, but in general fall about slightly higher means throughout the remainder of the experiment (figures lc, 3 a, 7a, and 8a). Hence with the lines of D. pulex the reproductive index increased somewhat during the course of the experiment. The reproductive indices for Line 740 show marked increases for the two-month periods just following the first 4 months of selec- tion. These early low reproductive indices are clearly related to the poor food conditions prevalent during the early months of selection with this line and reflected even more strongly in the D. pulex lines which had been in the laboratory for several months previously. There is also a rise in reproductive index for Line 757 after the first 2 months, and this rise is only partly coincident with recognized differences in food conditions in the laboratory. This rise is capable of explanation as due to the cumulative effect of better food conditions in the laboratory than in the outdoor ponds, but practically the maximum rise in reproductive index for this line was realized at once (figure 17c)1 and there is no evidence for a cumulative effect of better food conditions. The reproductive indices for Line 795 are much higher during the latter part of the experiment than earlier (figure 12a), but the reverse is true for Line 796 (figure 13a). On the whole, the reproductive indices for S. exspinosus do not show any general increase or decrease during the course of the experiment. Thus it is seen that reproductive indices for the D. pulex strains increase somewhat during the course of the experiment, while re- 1The general level for the plus strain was not higher for the remainder of the experiment, though the general level for the minus strain increased somewhat further. 148 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF action-time means are neither increased nor decreased. On the other hand, reaction-time means are decreased for S. exspinosus lines, while there are no consistent general changes in reproductive indices. Perhaps no better evidence bearing on the relation between reproductive vigor and reaction-time can be had (or desired) than that obtained from the following data: The total numbers of indi- viduals tested in making the selections in all the plus strains of D. pulex for the entire series of the experiments was 6,991; the mean reaction-time of these 6,991 individuals was 343.76 seconds. The corresponding figures for all the minus strains of D. pulex were 6,973 individuals, with a mean reaction-time of 345.92 seconds. The difference was only 2.16 seconds. For the S. exspinosus plus strains (except Line 757 plus), the total number of individuals was 4,722 and the mean reaction-time 531.56 seconds. For the 8. exspinosus minus strains (except 757 minus) the figures were 3,943 individuals and 532.55 seconds. The difference is 0.99 second. Since in both species the plus strains in general were somewhat more vigorous than the corresponding minus strains, these negligible differences in reaction-time means for the entire series of experiments indicate a lack of relation between reproductive index and reaction- time. Possible Divergence in Vigor between the Two" Strains of a Selected Line. The effect of selection on the basis of reaction to light might conceivably result in plus strains of greater vigor and minus strains of reduced vigor. It would indeed seem possible that the minus strains might become very much reduced in vitality and perhaps eventually die out if selection were continued long enough. In view of this theoretical possibility it is interesting to note that of the selection experiments discontinued because of loss of one or both of the strains (see table 1, column 8), 2 lines were discontinued because of the loss of both strains within a few days of each other, 1 line suffered the loss of the minus strain only, and 5 lines suffered the loss of the plus strain only.1 Hence this significant bit of data does not indicate reduced vitality in the minus strains as compared with the corresponding plus strains. Column 9 of table 1 likewise throws light upon a point inti- mately associated with the general vitality of corresponding plus and minus strains, the relative numbers of generations of descent of the plus and corresponding minus strains. This column shows the total number of generations of descent of the different strains at the close of selection within the different lines. In 8 lines the plus strain had descended for a greater number of generations than the corresponding minus strains; in 7 the minus had descended farther; and in 1 line 1 Two of the last were lost through accident, however, rather than because of general weak- ness or poor food conditions, and one of the minus strains suffered the accidental loss of part of its stock, except for which it might have survived. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 149 the 2 strains had descended an equal number of generations. The plus strains which had descended a greater number of generations averaged an advance of 2.9 generations ahead of their respective minus strains; the minus strains which had descended farther than their corresponding plus strains averaged an advance of 4.3 genera- tions beyond the plus strains. The D. pulex and S. exspinosus lines were pretty well divided as to whether the plus or minus strains had descended the greater number of generations. In all the D. longispina lines, however, the plus strain had descended farther — by a single generation in two of the lines, but by 5 generations (almost 11 per cent) in one. Hence, there was possibly some real loss of vigor in the minus strains of D. longispina as compared with their respective plus strains (though three lines are too small a number from which to reach a safe conclusion). But with S. exspinosus and D. pulex there was no loss in vigor of the minus as compared with their respective plus strains, so far as was revealed by their total numbers of general tions of descent. In fact (so far as this point is concerned), the minus strains in 5 of the 8 D. pulex lines descended farther and by larger margins (an average of 5.2 generations as compared with 3.7 genera- tions for the plus strains), which affords almost as much ground for assuming that the plus strains of the D. pulex lines became of inferior vigor compared with the corresponding minus strains as is afforded for the opposite conclusion with reference to the D. longispina lines. Some effect of the selections upon the general vigor of the corresponding plus and minus strains is evident, however, in some cases in the generally lower reproductive indices for some of the minus strains as compared with their corresponding plus strains. In only 1 (Line 740) of the 8 lines for which the reproductive indices have been worked out was the minus strain in general conspicuously the more vigorous of the 2 strains of the same line (figure 14b). It is significant, however, that (except possibly for parts of the data for Lines 795 and 796, and these differences were not maintained) the differences in vigor of the two strains of the same line were not cumulative; and in no case were they greater during the later than during the early portions of the experiments, except for the very first months of selection. It would seem, then, that in some cases there was a tendency for the selected individual (the most reactive individual) in the plus strain to be more vigorous than the selected individual (the least reactive individual) in the corresponding minus strains, but that this difference is neither universal, uniform, nor cumulative in its effect. As is shown elsewhere, differences in re- productive indices, even when relatively large, are not associated with corresponding differences in reaction- time.1 'The lack of relation between reproductive index and reaction-time has been referred to in several places (see pages 40-45, 49, 60, 65, 72, 76, 80, 83, 88-89, and 108-115) and need not be further discussed here. 150 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF STATEMENT OF RESULTS OF SELECTION. The results of this series of experiments may be stated briefly: With two lines, Lines 689 and 719, there were found reaction- time differences in the reverse of selection. These differences were so consistent as to suggest real genetic differences affecting reactive- ness in the two strains of these two lines, though Line 689 was carried for a relatively short period of time. In the case of Line 719 the reaction-times differed less toward the end of the experiment, and it is suggested that selection may have operated to produce this effect. The results with Line 689 and Line 719 suggest that in addition to genetic differences in the direction sought in selection genetic changes may occur in the opposite direction. This is strongly sug- gestive of mutation. It does not, however, obviate the theoretical difficulty of explaining by mutation the plural genetic changes in Line 757. Lines 695, 713, 714, 751, 766, 768, and 796 show no evidence (or slight evidence as in Line 713) of significant differences in reactive- ness between their plus and minus strains. Some of these lines were carried for relatively short periods of time, but Lines 695, 713, 714, and perhaps 768 and 796 were subjected to selection for what would seem adequate periods of time. Line 691 shows a possible effect of selection, though such an effect is not fully supported by the last year's data and may therefore be disregarded. Selection was conducted for 27 months, 84 and 85 generations in the two strains. Line 711 apparently shows an effect of selection, but the differ- ences are small and the evidence is not entirely conclusive, though the case is as convincing as the result in the opposite direction for Lines 689 and 719. Selection was continued for 45 and 46 genera- tions, covering a period of about 16 months. Line 762 gave a possible effect of selection during the last two months of the experiment. In view of the wide fluctuations in the reaction-time curves of many of the lines, this is not sufficient data upon which to base a conclusion, but the entire consistency in the differences between broods of the plus and minus strains during this late portion of the experiment is unusual enough to be highly sug- gestive. However, in view of the local differences in reactiveness seen in other lines (see pages 140-142), an effect of selection in Line 762 must be considered problematical. The plus strain was lost, thereby terminating the experiment after 36 and 35 generations of selection. Line 794 may have undergone a divergence in reactiveness during selection. For the first 6 months the differences were in the reverse of selection, but the remaining 12 two-month periods gave differences in the opposite direction, with 3 exceptions, and 8 of these differences A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 151 were relatively large. The single test series, however, quite fails to lend support to a difference in reactiveness between the two strains, and this case likewise remains doubtful. Line 795 clearly shows a lack of selective effect during most of the experiment. The last month's data is very suggestive of signi- ficant reaction-time differences, but the data are too slight in amount to receive serious consideration. A mutation possibly occurred in the minus strain of Line 740, causing it to be more reactive to light. The case was critically examined (page 89) and the conclusion was reached that the unusual reactiveness of a few broods of this strain was probably due to peculiar local environmental conditions. None of the above possible cases of differences in reactiveness between the two strains of a line is well enough supported by the evidence to be considered proven. The cases best supported by the evidence are in Lines 689, 719, and 711. In Lines 689 and 719 the differences are in the reverse of selection. With Line 719 the difference was slight during the latter portion of the experiment. Line 689 was lost before enough evidence was obtained to convince one that the difference was necessarily genetic. Line 711 shows con- sistent differences in accordance with an effect of selection, but, like Line 689, was lost before enough evidence was obtained to convince one that the difference was certainly genetic. With Line 757, on the other hand, a marked effect of selection is attested by every significant bit of evidence which the data for this line provide. The divergence in mean reaction-times began to appear after the first 3 months at the beginning of the experiment (for which the two strains had the same reaction- time means). For the second (two-month) period the means differed by —25 ±22.82 seconds, and the means for the following two-month period differed by —72 ±17.78 seconds, a difference of statistical significance (4.05 times the probable error), in spite of the small numbers and consequently large probable error. This is followed by 6 two-month periods, during which the differences are all in the same direction and 3 of which (even for the shorter periods) are of large statistical significance, though the differences of —55/— 63, and —70 seconds were not of statistical value because of large probable errors. For the two-month period June- July 1914 the minus strain was the more reactive and the difference was 132 ±29.79 seconds, a difference 4.4 times the probable error. For the following two-month period the difference is only —2 seconds. From this period on, all the 16 differences (by two-month periods) indicate greater reactiveness in the plus strain. With 3 exceptions the differences were large and of statistical value, even when considered by two-month periods. One of these smaller differences, which was not of statistical value, occurred within 3 152 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF months of the close of the experiment, when the effect of selection was at its height.1 Considering the data by longer periods, those from the beginning of the experiment to July 1914 show significant differences in mean reaction-time, though the early differences were generally not large. Following this was a period during which both strains, and particu- larly the minus strain, fluctuated widely, though the difference for this longer period is significant of a real difference in reactiveness between the two strains. During the latter part of 1915 the dis- turbances due to environmental factors became less marked and the divergence in mean reaction-time appeared to increase greatly and, with a single fluctuation, continued very large during the remainder of the experiment. During the final 9 months of the experiment the mean for the plus strain was only one-third that for the minus strain. The form of the curves (figure 18b) suggests that the divergence in reactiveness was still increasing at the close of the experiment. Points of importance in connection with the results with Line 757 are that both the plus and minus strains became modified during selection and that the divergence was permanent or at least persisted for 1 12 generations. It is also important to note that there is nothing to distinguish the two strains other than the difference in behavior of the strains in the experimental tank in response to directive stimulation by light, and a somewhat higher reproductive index for the plus strain during most but not during the concluding months of the experiment. DISCUSSION OF RESULTS. Consistent differences in reactions to light of animals of the same or closely related stocks appear not to have been frequently found. McEwan (1918) presents a conclusive case of differences in phototropism which are clearly genetic. A certain mutant strain, "tan," of Drosophila melanogaster, unlike most of this species, showed very little response to light. Tan is a very variable character and can not always be distinguished by inspection of the flies. The differences in phototropism between tan and normal flies were so striking that it was found (and proven by breeding tests) that the slight phototropism of tan stock was a more reliable means of diag- nosing tan than inspection of the flies. The character was shown to be a recessive sex-linked character. McEwan found differences in 1 Such a marked reduction in the difference between the means, coming at a time when according to all criteria the two strains were so different in their reactiveness to light, seems certainly due to unequal local environmental influences, which may also account for the relatively wide fluctuations in the reaction-time curves for the period from June 1914 to July 1915 (see pages 141 and 159-160). While during this earlier period the minus strain for 1 two-month period had the lower reaction-time mean, this fact need perhaps excite no more surprise than the fact that the mean for the minus strain was so near that for the plus strain at the later period when the general reactiveness of the two strains was so widely different. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 153 phototropism of other types of Drosophila, but these were associated with differences in the color or other conditions of the eye itself. In the tan mutant, on the other hand, no peculiarities could be dis- covered in the eye. The writer has considerable (unpublished) data tending to show that the amphipod Eucrangonyx gracilis, living in the surface streams near Bloomington, Indiana, is less negatively phototropic than the same species which lives in Mayfield's Cave, near at hand. The differences in reaction are not large and consistent enough to be very conclusive. In this species those inhabiting caves and those inhabiting the open are indistinguishable morphologically, except for differences in pigmentation, the former having fully pigmented eyes, but no body pigment. In asexually reproducing forms1 Jennings (1908, 1909) with Paramecium, Agar (1913, 1914) with Cladocera, Ewing (1914) with aphids, Hanel (1908) and Lashley (1915, 1916) with Hydra, and other workers have failed to obtain hereditarily diverse strains by selection within the uniparental progeny of single individuals. On the other hand, Middleton (1915) in Stylonychia, Stout (1915) with Coleus, Jennings (1916) with Difflugia, Root (1918) in Centro- pyxis, and Hegner (1918, 1919) with Arcella seem to have found genetic variation wherever they sought it. Stocking (1915), studying abnormalities in Paramecium, found that of 122 strains containing abnormal individuals, in which the character was clearly hereditary, 97 were persistently abnormal races, i. e., they presumably were not subject to genetic variation in this regard; and 25 strains were subject to genetic variation, i. e., selection was effective in 25 strains. That is to say, about 20 per cent of the strains studied by her, in which the character was inherited, were subject to genetic variation. The results of selection with Protozoa are open to certain objec- tions which Jennings (1916, p. 523) outlines somewhat as follows: (1) that the results may be due to cytoplasmic influences and hence may not be of real genetic significance; (2) that the result may be due to nuclear recombination between the active nucleus and nuclear material within the cytoplasm (chromidia); and (3) that nuclear recombination may occur between different nuclear masses in the same individual. Professor Jennings (1916, p. 525) believes that these possibilities have "no claim to greater probability than their negatives, so far as our knowledge of the facts is concerned." The opinion of different workers as to the validity of these objections differs greatly. 1 In view of the many excellent historical accounts which have appeared it does not seem desirable to review any considerable portion of the vast amount of work on selection within the pure line. Excellent discussions of this literature are given by Jennings (1910, 1917), Pearl (1917), and Sturtevant (1918). 154 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF Cladocera material has the advantages for a selection experiment possessed by protozoa in that it is (under controlled conditions) exclusively uniparental in inheritance. It has additional advantages in that the germ-plasm is less bound up with the soma than in protozoa and the very great advantage that (so far as our knowledge goes, at any rate) there are no complications of chromidia or separate nuclear masses within the germ-cell, recombination of which might conceivably produce the results attained by selection in protozoa. So far as known, there is no mechanism within the germ-cells of Cladocera through which a segregation or recombination of nuclear material is to be expected in parthenogenesis. In the production of the parthenogenetic egg there is a single maturation division (Weismann, 1886; Kiihn, 1908), in which the chromosomes behave as in any ordinary cell-division, i. e., each chromosome is merely divided into two theoretically equal parts, equal quantitatively and quali- tatively. Hence the objections offered to results of selection with protozoa do not apply to the present material. Any results obtained from selection in such material (parthenogenetic and without reduc- tion) should have a crucial bearing on the problem of selection. In experiments having to do with the variability of organisms it does not seem necessary to suppose that all apparently similar material should be found similarly subject to genetic variation. In Stocking's (1915) Paramecium, about 20 per cent of the strains in which an abnormality was hereditary showed genetic variation. In the Cladocera material used in selection, Line 757 alone has certainly shown such genetic variation with regard to the character- istic studied, though the possible (but doubtful) mutation in the minus strain of Line 740 and the somewhat consistent differences in mean reaction-times between the two strains of Lines 689, 691, 711, 719, 762, 794, and 795 are suggestive of differences of genetic significance. Allowing that the case is proven for Line 757 alone (though some of the other cases are very suggestive), genetic variation was found in only one of the 15 distinct lines of Cladocera studied. This is approximately only 7 per cent. The effects of selection in Line 757 may be assumed to be either (1) of a nature of general physiological changes, possibly changes in metabolism or some kindred effect, or (2) direct genetic changes.1 If the former interpretation is favored, the question arises as to what is the basis of such physiological effects. If they are con- sidered not strictly genetic, the apparently permanent nature of the change is a matter of especial importance. Cases of transmission 1 In this discussion genetic variations, in metazoa at least, are assumed to concern genetic factors confined to the chromosomes. The carrying over from one generation to another of cytoplasmic inclusions and the transmission of variations or modifications which affect only one or two generations are assumed to concern the cytoplasm alone and are consideied not strictly genetic. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 155 not really genetic and some of which are clearly cytoplasmic are well known. If Sudan III is fed to fowls some of the dye is deposited in the egg-yolk (Riddle, 1908) and reappears in certain of the tissues of the chick (Gage and Gage, 1908). This is merely the carrying over of a cytoplasmic inclusion. Other cytoplasmic inclusions, the plastids of plants, parasitic or symbiotic bacteria and protozoa, are carried over in the cytoplasm of the egg; but these are mere inclusions and this is not true inheritance. Starving occasionally causes the production of young of small size. The effect would seem probably due to reduced quantity of food material (or to deleterious sub- stances) in the egg cytoplasm. Later generations are not affected. The effects of immunization are transmitted by the mother and not by the father. The effects are not permanently transmitted and are presumably cytoplasmic. Agar (1913) was able to produce young Cladocera with carapace gaping open by keeping the mothers in a particular food medium. This peculiarity was transmitted for one generation by affected stock when reared in the usual culture medium, but the abnormality rapidly decreased and ceased to appear after one generation. This transmission may readily have been cytoplasmic, but it is clearly not a case of real inheritance. The substances carried over in the egg cytoplasm (if there were such) were rapidly dissipated and lost. These are typical cases of cytoplasmic transmission, and one may conclude with Conklin (1920) that "in the present state of our knowledge there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that modifications of the cytoplasm of germ-cells are ever really inherited or that they are ever the initial steps in evolution." To assume that the changes in phototropism in the present case were not really genetic would seem to place them in the class of cytoplasmic transmissions and to assume a permanent cytoplasmic or extra-genetic transmission which in our present state of knowledge would seem unwarranted. Aside from its theoretical difficulty, there does not seem to be any evidence favoring the assumption of general and purely physio- logical changes as accounting for the divergence in reactiveness of the two strains of Line 757, since these two strains are indistinguish- able, except in their reactiveness to light. However, it is of course possible to assume that a non-chromo- somal inheritance occurs and to apply this interpretation to the present results, though the writer can see no reason for favoring such an interpretation. If, however, this should prove to be the correct interpretation a practically new phase of inheritance is opened up, and in any case the importance of the present results as bearing upon selection within the pure line is not lessened. If, on the other hand, physiological changes having a genetic basis be assumed to explain the present results of selection, the nature of the factorial changes involved is still the pertinent question. 156 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF If the variations are considered direct genetic changes (or general physiological changes having a genetic basis), thej' may be thought of as having been due to segregation,1 to larger mutations, or to many small genetic changes. It would seem that the effect of selection here obtained can not be explained as due to recombination or segregation unless segrega- tion occurred rather generally in Line 757 under conditions in which it is not known and is theoretically not supposed to occur. It is conceivable, however, that segregation may occur on rare occasions in Cladocera in the germ-tract previous to maturation, in the one maturation division (even though that is a non-reduction division), or in cleavage or later somatic divisions. But this explanation for the result with Line 757 encounters certain difficulties: (1) Such factorial recombination, if large quantitatively, should at once pro- duce an obvious effect. (2) If, on the other hand, the factorial re- combination produces only a slight effect, the result obtained with Si?nocephalus Line 757 is explicable only as the result of several of \hese exceptional factorial changes. (3) The effect is in both high and low selection strains. Since with Line 757 the effect is extensive, is in both strains, and appears gradually and not by a sudden increment (except possibly, but doubtfully, at one point in the minus strain), this sort of explana- tion would call for more than a single factorial recombination. Probably many more genetic changes occurred, but at least three such genetic recombinations are required to explain the case on this basis. Such might possibly be located as follows: one in the minus strain early in its laboratory history, one in the plus strain, possibly about January 1915, and one in the minus strain about August 1915 (figure 18b). But the points at which these three or more hypothet- ical recombinations occurred are not indicated in the data by broods (tables 41 and 42) and can be doubtfully and only approximately located (assuming1 that they were masked for a time by environ- mental conditions) by reference to the averages by two-month periods (tables 43 and 44 and figure 18b). Yet presumably these, at least the third one2 (assuming a minimum of three genetic modifications), must have been genetic changes of large moment, considering the wide differences in reactiveness between the two strains during the latter portion of the experiment. Since these factorial changes must have come about under exceptional conditions, three or more such occurrences affecting two strains of the same line within a limited period seem unlikely of attainment. Note. — There is another possible suggestion concerning segregation in this material: that notwithstanding parthenogenesis and the presumed lack of segregation in maturation there may be a mechanism in Cladocera by which changes in genetic constitution may, 1 Including the phenomena of crossing-over and non-disjunction. 2 As shown on page 159, there is strong probability that no large genetic change occurred at this point. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 157 in certain cases, be readily brought about in parthenogenetic reproduction. This is not indicated by the cytological evidence, so far as known, and would seem to call for quite a novel type of cytological behavior for which there is no direct genetic or cytological evidence in parthenogenetic organisms. But should there prove to be such a segregation in Simocephalus, then the effects of selection in this experiment with Cladocera readily yield to explanation in conformity with the chromosome interpretation of the pure-line hypothesis. Otherwise the writer does not see how the results can be satisfactorily made to conform with this theory. The Cladocera material deserves a critical cytological analysis. The writer would gladly cooperate in providing material for such a study by a cytologist who could give ample time to the problem. It is just possible, however, that there may be an unusual or at any rate virtually unknown type of chromosomal behavior in Cladocera, permitting segregation more fre- quently than would otherwise be expected in material in which segregation seems improb- able. Wenrich's (1916) observations on Phrynotettix are most suggestive in this connection. He found reduction occurring in a single chromosome and apparently not affecting the other chromosomes in that division. Crossing-over and non-disjunction (which Bridges and others have demonstrated and utilized so successfully in interpreting genetic results with Drosophila and other forms) may be appealed to as affording possible vehicles for such genetic changes, assuming that several genetic factors are involved in the reactiveness to light in Cladocera and that Line 757 was originally heterozygous for certain of these factors. In view of such known irregularities in chromosome behavior, one is led to consider the possibility that a partial segregation may occur in the one maturation division in partheno- genetic reproduction in Cladocera. Nabours (1919) found segregation in parthenogenetic reproduction in one of the grouse locusts, Apotettix. However, judging from the very limited cytological evidence presented, it would seem that in this case reduction was fully accomplished, as in sexual reproduction. However, there is no cytological evidence that reduction or segregation of any sort occurs in the one maturation division of parthenogenetic eggs of Cladocera and, even assuming that such a partial segregation may occur in the single maturation division in Cladocera, there is still the theoretical difficulty of accounting for such frequent genetic change as seems to have occurred in Line 757. For it is hard to see how, even with assumed partial reduction in Cladocera (which lack the complicated features of protozoan nuclei), the rate of genetic change should so greatly have exceeded that so carefully worked out for Drosophila. This is not necessarily a fatal objection, however. Even though Cladocera are probably very little subject to genetic change, once genetic change occurs, for any thing we know to the contrary, it may proceed at a rapid rate. This possible explanation has a certain appeal to the writer, not only because it offers an explanation (in accord with the explanation offered for most results of selection) for the results attained in the present study of the effects of selection on the basis of reactive- ness to light, but also because certain other (unpublished) results of study of Cladocera material may in part be explained on this basis. Explanation of the result with Line 757 by larger mutations encounters considerable difficulty: (1) the necessity for assuming at least three mutations, at least one of which must have been quite large; (2) the lack of definite points at which mutations may be presumed to have occurred; and (3) the occurrence of an additional mutation or mutations effective in the same direction as an earlier one. Further, the mutations in the two strains must have occurred in opposite directions, rendering the plus strain more reactive and the minus strain less reactive. In general, in uniparental inheritance mutation may perhaps be expected to be only half as frequent as in biparsntal inheritance, since in the former a single germ-cell is involved in the production of each individual offspring. Bridges (1919) states evidence tending to show that in Drosophila mutations may occur in oogonial (or sperma- togonia!) divisions and in the zygote "immediately after fertiliza- 158 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF tion," although he states that in the much-mutating Drosophila the bulk of the mutations occur "at or very near the maturation stage." In parthenogenetic reproduction in Cladocera, with only one matura- tion division (and that a non-reduction division) the probability of mutation would seem further greatly reduced. Hence, so far as one may judge, mutations in Cladocera should be expected to be much less frequent than in Drosophila. In the latter, Muller and Alten- burg (1919) state that mutation in a particular factor is infrequent. From their data,1 mutation in a particular factor occurs about once in 50,000 generations. Yet this is the much-mutating Drosophila. Hence, if one may judge from the evidence from Drosophila, mutation in parthenogenetic reproduction in Cladocera should be very rare. The selection experiment with Line 757 covered 181 generations. If larger mutations (affecting reactiveness to light) occurred, there must have been one (at least) in the plus strain and two (at least) in 181 generations in the minus strain, a surprisingly high incidence. It is possible that several genetic factors are concerned in the photo- tropism of Simocephalus, though McEwan (1918) found that a single mutant factor in "tan" Drosophila profoundly modified its photo- tropism. But even if several factors are concerned in the present case, at the rate of one mutation in a particular factor in 50,000 generations (for which Muller and Altenburg give data for Droso- phila), the rate of assumed mutation in Line 757 would seem most excessive. If one disregards the possible, though improbable, muta- tion in the plus strain of Line 740, and the possible, though unproven, genetic modifications in Lines 689, 691, 711, 719, 762, 794, and 795, of the Cladocera lines subjected to selection, Line 757 alone showed mutation. If larger mutations are to account for the result with Line 757, mutation must have been extremely frequent in this line and rare in the other Cladocera lines studied. It seems, then, that there is difficulty in explaining so many genetic changes as must have occurred in Line 757 during a relatively short period as due to larger mutations, such as have been worked out for Drosophila. If one seeks in the curves (figure 18b) for possible points of occurrence of larger mutations, three points at which such seem more nearly possible than elsewhere are seen in the curves, about April 1913 for the minus strain, about January 1915 for the plus strain, and about August 1915 for a second possible mutation in the minus strain. But the data by broods do not indicate points at which any mutation seems to have occurred. It is possible, of course, that the rather widely fluctuating averages by broods might tend to mask the occurrence of a mutation, but even so one would 'Conklin criticizes Muller and Altenburg's statement regarding the frequency of mutation, but even if this statement is unwarranted it will still readily be granted that mutation in a particular factor is infrequent. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 159 expect a mutation of considerable import to appear evident very quickly in the brood averages and one would seem justified in expect- ing a mutation of considerable import to produce a marked and immediate change in the two-month curve for the strain affected. But such marked and immediate shifts are not found in the curves (figure 18b), except possibly in the Line 757 minus curve following August 1915, and even there a mutation seems not to have occurred (see below). Since under the influence of the first two larger mutations pro- visionally assumed to have occurred (but for which no satisfactory locations can be found) the curves do not show great divergence, in comparison with their later divergence, the wide divergence between the curves for the two strains during the latter part of the experiment seems to call for a mutation of large moment if the result is to be explained by larger mutations. The divergence in the curves after the third point (August 1915), at which a larger mutation may possibly have occurred, seems somewhat pronounced, but does not appear abrupt enough to have been due to the influence of a single genetic change, unless the influence of this mutation was masked for a time by a pronounced influence of environmental factors. It is, of course, possible that this may have been the case. If, however, it is necessary to concede a marked influence of environmental factors, a more logical explanation of the curve for the minus strain would seem to lie in the interpretation that the irreg- ularities in the curve for the minus strain during the period June 1914-August 1915 were due entirely to marked local environmental influences. There seems no logical objection to this explanation. Evidence that this is the correct interpretation is seen in the wide fluctuations, parallel for the most part to those for the minus strain, in the Line 757 plus strain for the same period.1 Further evidence that this may be the correct interpretation is seen in the fact that fluctuations similar to those found in the strains of Line 757 during the period under discussion are seen during certain periods in other strains, e. g., in strains of Lines 695 and 740, in which genetic changes obviously had not occurred and in which only local environmental influences seem to account for the facts. During this time of great fluctuation in mean reaction-times in the two strains of Line 757, there were three relatively very low points in the Line 757 minus curve. Except for these low points, the curve for the minus strain is seen to have held to a fairly consistent course throughout the entire experiment (except for one two-month period, December 1916-January 1917, in which local 1 Except for the June-July 1914 period the fluctuations in the curves for the two strains of Line 757 are remarkably similar, though it is obvious that the Line 757 minus strain was somewhat more influenced by environmental factors than the plus strain (figure 18b). It is interesting to note that this June-July 1914 period is the only period of the entire experiment in which the minus strain of Line 757 appeared more reactive than the plus strain. 160 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF environmental influences obviously were the determining factor). If, assuming that environmental influences are responsible for the fluctuations during parts of 1914 and 1915, one momentarily dis- regards entirely the curves for the Line 757 strains during this period of irregularities, the curves for the two strains following this period are seen to be mere resumptions of the courses of the curves previous to this period. Hence it is seen that if it is necessary to assume that environ- mental factors exercised a determining influence, they may account in full for the deviations in the curves from their general courses during parts of 1914 and 1915, and there seems no necessity for, nor ground for, the assumption of a large mutation in the minus strain of Line 757 about August 1915; and, although this is the only point in the curves at which a mutation of considerable moment may seem to have occurred, the writer believes that another interpreta- tion more logically accounts for the facts of the case. It therefore appears that the point of occurrence of any really large mutation can not be satisfactorily located. Since the divergence in reactiveness between the two strains of Line 757 became very large and mutations of considerable moment can not be located, larger mutations do not seem to account for the result in Line 757. When one considers the further fact that a minimum of three larger mutations would be required to explain the case on this basis, and that, by analogy with the Drosophila case, this would call for an extremely high rate of mutation, the plausibility of this explanation still further decreases. The data for Line 757 readily permit of the interpretation of the result as having been due to imperceptibly1 small changes2 resulting, through selection, in cumulative effects in definite direc- tions. The result as shown in the curves (figures 18b and 19) readily lends itself to this explanation, assuming that the writer's inter- pretation is correct and that the irregular portions of the curves (during parts of 1914 and 1915) are really due to disturbing en- 1 At any rate, their occurrence was unperceived. Reaction-time in this study is read off in seconds. The character studied, reactiveness to light, would seem ideal for detecting minute genetic changes in that the smallest changes in reactiveness to light should presumably be de- tected. But the profound influence of environment upon reactiveness proved extremely dis- turbing and only by averaging large numbers of individual reaction-times could modifications in reactiveness be detected. This was a distinct disappointment. In this study, because of these fluctuations in reaction-time, every case in which there seems any reasonable doubt as to an effect of selection is refused credit in conclusions favoring an influence of selection, but in no case are the full experimental results withheld from the reader. 2 These changes, one believes, arose quite independently of selection, but were utilized through selection in building up the differences in reactiveness between the plus and minus strains. Selection does not cause genetic change. It merely seizes upon modifications of the character used in selection as they occur, and in the case of plural genetic changes may build up differences between selected strains. However, retention (through selection) of an heredi- tarily changed character, in so far as it preserves the material which may undergo further genetic variation, makes possible a further change in the same direction in the same character. Selection, although not a cause of variation, thus enables a deviation to be built up in the character utilized in selection if genetic changes occur in the direction sought. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 161 vironmental influences as the peculiar results for the December 1916- January 1917 period clearly are. Except for the fluctuations in the curves for the period men- tioned, the curves for the two strains of Line 757 diverge rather gradually and somewhat uniformly. There are considerable irregu- larities in the curve for the plus strain, both during the period when irregularities occurred in the minus strain and elsewhere, but despite irregularities the general appearance of this curve strongly suggests that its true course is approximately a straight line. The general course of the curve for the minus strain less strikingly appears to be a straight line, but, aside from the irregularities already pointed out and accounted for, this curve is as regular as most curves based upon similar biological material. The courses of the curves at the end of selection are such as to suggest that the divergence in reactiveness between the two strains was still increasing when the experiment closed. Many workers would prefer to call these small genetic changes mutations, but they are indistinguishable from continuous gradual changes and must have occurred with a frequency quite unknown in forms in which the points of occurrence of definite mutations have been recognized. Jennings (1916, p. 526) applies the term mutation to such frequent small changes in morphological characters in protozoa, and Hegner (1919) calls such small structural changes (arising in his Arcella) mutations. But the complicated and less well-known conditions of the nuclear material in protozoa and the direct continuity between the cytoplasm, which one may think of as soma, of the parent and that of offspring lead one to feel that at least there is no positive assurance that conditions in protozoa are entirely comparable with metozoa. In parthenogenetic Cladocera, without the reduction matura- tion division and apparently lacking in unequal distribution of nuclear elements, such as may occur in division in protozoa (Hegner, 1919), frequent mutation would not seem to be expected, since such frequent mutation as would be called for in the present case has not been recognized in metazoa and the mutations which have been most frequent have generally appeared to be associated with maturation. So many mutations through a lapse of only 181 generations would call for mutations at a truly phenomenal rate. However, the matter of a name for the genetic change merely turns upon one's definition of a mutation. The facts of the present case are in nowise altered, whether the small changes in character are termed mutations or given other designation. It is possible that modifications of genes are frequently of a low order and consequently not generally recog- nized; further, that although they are not to be found wherever sought, once such genetic change is initiated, such variations may be frequent in occurrence. 162 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF The explanation of the results of selection in this material as having been due to many small genetic changes is suggested with extreme caution. There is the objection that such an explanation runs counter to the most acceptable explanation for most cases of effective selection within the pure line and that many cases for which this explanation has been invoked have later yielded to analysis on the basis of demonstrable mutation or genetic segrega- tion. But the objections to explanation of the present case as due to segregation or larger mutations seem even more weighty (unless one assumes a novel and quite unknown type of segregation in this material), and it is believed that gradual modification of the factor or factors involved in the present case must receive serious consideration. Since changes in a character seem to occur with such frequency in some clones of Cladocera, material in which because of uniparental inheritance and lack of reduction frequent genetic changes would seem not to be expected, one wonders if this type of organism is unique among metazoa and if such genetic changes may not likewise be found to occur elsewhere. In other words, may not selection be found equally successful in some other material and may not the case for selection be more hopeful than is generally supposed? In any material in which improvement or change in a character is sought, genetic variation may (or may not) be encountered. If genetic variation occurs in the character studied and in the direction sought, selection (though not a cause of the variations) may be a means of utilizing the variations in accomplishing the end sought. The pure-line concept, set forth by Jordan and elaborated by Johannsen and his followers, has been extended until it has been shown to have wide application. Whether it may become universal in its application remains to be seen. The writer believes that such cases as the present are crucial in their relation to the universal validity of the theory, and that if they are not (or until they are) brought into line this concept can not attain the dignity of a law. It is for this reason that the present case has been presented in so much detail. Whatever explanation one finds acceptable, the facts are that the effects of selection within Line 757 are due both to an increased reactiveness in the plus strain of Line 757 and a decreased reactive- ness in the minus strain of the same line (both relative to the corre- sponding strains of the other lines of Simocephalus) , the two modifica- tions working together to produce a large difference in reactiveness between the two strains of Line 757; and that this difference was permanent or at least persisted for 112 generations after selection was discontinued. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 163 SUMMARY. 1. In experiments undertaken to get additional data on the effects of selection within the pure line, Cladocera material was chosen because of certain advantages: (a) it reproduces rapidly, (b) is readily handled in the laboratory, (c) under controlled conditions it is exclusively parthenogenetic, and (d) in its parthenogenetic reproduction there is a single maturation division without reduction, so that presumably it presents none of the complications present in material in which segregation occurs during maturation and in which fertilization occurs. 2. Selection was based upon a physiological character: reactive- ness to directive light stimulation. 3. The material consisted of three species: Daphnia pulex, D. longispina, and Simocephalus exspinosus, collected at different times from three ponds at Cold Spring Harbor. 4. The animals were reared in 200-c. c. wide-mouthed bottles with about 100 c. c. of culture-water which was ordinarily unchanged from the time a young female was placed in the bottle until she produced young. 5. Selections were made during the first day of life of the young daphnids. The plus and minus strains of each line came from a single progenitor. 6. The selections were conducted with light intensities of ap- proximately 120 candle-meters. 7. Environmental factors modified reaction-time; but, presum- ably, these were horizontal influences equally operative in both strains and with all the individuals tested in making each selection, and hence did not influence the selections per se. The relation between environmental conditions and both re- action-time and vigor is considered in some detail. (a) There are shown to be low correlations between the tempera- ture of the water in the experimental tank and reaction-time of young daphnids. These correlations are generally positive, meaning that reactiveness is decreased with increase in temperature. This result was not anticipated. It is suggested that where this relation holds it may be due to greater oxygen-content in the water of the experimental tank with lower temperatures. (6) Some substance exhaled from the observer's breath, pre- sumably C02, influences reactiveness. Frequent changes of the water in the experimental tank reduced this influence to a minimum. (c) Relatively temporary chemical (?) differences in the water used in the experimental tank sometimes influences reaction-time to a marked degree. 164 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF (d) Negatively reacting individuals appear under circumstances suggesting that their occurrence is the result of peculiar local environ- mental conditions affecting the water of the experimental tank. (e) Broad up-and-down movements in the reaction-time curves are presumably largely reflections of underlying (as distinguished ' from more temporary) changes in content of the pond-water, though in some cases temperature influences are contributory. More local contemporaneous changes are clearly produced by factors other than temperature, presumably changed constituents of the culture-water and the water used in the experimental tank. (/) Slight seasonal (winter and summer) changes in reactiveness are attributed to direct temperature influences and to the indirect influence of temperature as affecting the content of the culture-water as well as the water used in the experimental tank. (g) Following July 1913, and extending throughout the re- mainder of the experiment, there was a gradual increase in the re- activeness of all the strains of Simocephalus. That this is not due to the cumulative effect of favorable conditions in the laboratory is indicated: (1) by the fact that for several months after selection was begun with the older lines of Simocephalus there was a general decrease in reactiveness; (2) that the increase in reactiveness affected all strains at the same time, though they had been in the laboratory for different periods of time; and (3) that the reaction-time curves for the newer Simocephalus lines (Lines 794, 795, and 796) start at and follow approximately the same levels as were attained by the older lines for contemporaneous two-month periods. (h) Because of the fact that the two strains of a selected line ordinarily reproduce on different days, culture-water from different collections was usually used with the two related strains. This unavoidably somewhat differential treatment is believed to account for some of the independent shifts in reaction-time means affecting the two strains of the same line. One such shift, for a time, materially cut down the difference in reaction-time means between the two strains of Line 757. (i) Relatively local environmental influences are believed to explain certain abrupt shifts in the reaction-time curves and in reproductive indices which some workers with Cladocera might be inclined to ascribe to "depression periods." (j) Environmental conditions obviously influence the vigor of Cladocera. (k) The "reproductive index" is believed to be a safe measure of general vigor and probably of general muscular activity as well. (I) Similar effects of environmental conditions are seen in many coincident fluctuations in vigor of the two strains of the same line, of all or most of the strains of the same species, and even of many of the strains of both Simocephalus and Daphnia. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 165 (m) Independent fluctuations in vigor, like the independent fluctuations in reaction-time affecting related strains, are believed to be due to the somewhat differential treatment of the material. in) This factor is also believed to account for the generally- greater divergence between the two strains of a line during later periods than at the beginning of selection. (o) There is not a generally increased reproductive index in S. exspinosus to correspond with the increased reactiveness of this species. (p) Selection did not produce plus strains of increasingly greater vigor as contrasted with minus strains of less vigor, either when measured by the numbers of plus and minus strains which died out, by the total numbers of generations of descent, or by the reproduc- tive index. 8. Sometimes the plus and minus strains of the same line repro- duced on and were tested on the same day. The " same-day-brood " data is more trustworthy, because of more uniform environmental conditions, than data not simultaneously obtained, and is given separate treatment. 9. Reaction-time means were obtained of large numbers of young from mothers of each of the two strains of a line reared simul- taneously and tested on the same day. These "test" series gave averages obtained from several hundred individuals reared and sub- jected to stimulation by light under as nearly uniform conditions as possible, and served to check up the effect or lack of effect of selection within individual lines. 10. Reaction-time is slightly, if at all, correlated with reproduc- tive vigor. This is a point of interest, since the minus strains in general had a somewhat lower reproductive index than the corre- sponding plus strains. 11. The possibility that the method of selection might have been inadequate is discussed and evidence given which it is believed vindicates the method used. Were the method of selection greatly at fault the results obtained with some of the lines, particularly with Line 757, could not have been possible. 12. In general, the plus strains showed somewhat greater repro- ductive vigor (measured by reproductive indices) than the corre- sponding minus strains. But this effect was not cumulative and selection did not result in plus strains of increasingly greater vigor than corresponding minus strains. 13. There are differences between the behavior of the different species in the experimental tank. S. exspinosus was generally relatively slightly reactive compared with the two species of Daphnia. Many individuals of this species (and a few of the species of Daphnia) failed to reach either end of the experimental tank during the 15- minute period of the selection test. 166 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA ON THE BASIS OF 14. The data for the over-time individuals presented a serious difficulty. In many cases, especially with the Siinocephalus lines, they constituted a considerable portion, and a most significant por- tion, of the reaction-time data. Over-time individuals were arbi- trarily assigned a reaction-time of 900 seconds and treated as though they had reached an end of the tank within the period of the test. This expedient really minimized the rightful influence of these relatively slightly reactive but highly significant individuals. 15. Negatively reacting individuals were very irregular in occur- rence and of doubtful significance. They were utilized in selection in the minus strains under the assumption that a genetic change might occur rendering an individual fundamentally negative in its reactions to light. 16. Many of the data are published for the benefit of workers who might wish to go over the analysis or make further analysis. In the treatment of the data for the different lines the following results are recorded: 17. For Line 695 there was not an effect of selection. A marked general influence of environmental factors upon reaction- times is observed, as is true with most of the other lines. 18. In Line 689 selection was not effective. On the contrary, there was a persistent, though slight, difference tending to indicate that the minus strain was the more reactive. 19. In Line 691 there was no certain effect of selection, though part of the data suggests such an effect. 20. In Line 711 a selective effect is strongly suggested, though not fully supported by the same-day-brood data. The evidence for a genetic difference between the two strains is, however, as good or better than that suggesting a genetic difference between the two strains of Line 689. 21. The data in part suggest an effect of selection in Line 713, but it is improbable that such actually occurred. 22. Some of the early data for Line 714 suggest an effect of selection, but the later data show clearly that such had not occurred. 23. In Line 719, as in Line 689, there is a generally higher reaction-time for the plus strain. The different periods of the data, in spite of considerable fluctuations, rather consistently bear out this interpretation, and genetic differences in opposition to selection are believed to have arisen. Selection possibly operated to reduce this difference, which was less marked during the latter part of the experiment. 24. There was no effect of selection in Line 751. 25. Some of the final data for Line 762 suggest an effect of selection, but the data are not sufficient to be at all convincing. A PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTER. 167 26. In the short experiment with Line 766 (derived from Line 762) there was no effect of selection. 27. There was no effect of selection in Line 768. 28. Most of the data for Line 794 suggest an effect of selection, though the test series did not support this conclusion and effect of selection must remain in doubt. 29. Effect of selection is strongly indicated for the final data for Line 795, but in view of the earlier differences in the opposite direction and the small amount of the data which indicate an effect of selection, the result is questionable. 30. There is clearly no effect of selection in Line 796. 31. Certain portions of the data for Line 740 seem to indicate consistent differences in reaction-time for the two strains. A possible mutation early in the course of the experiment was examined, but ruled out as improbable. For 14 months preceding the final 3 months of the experiment, the plus strain was somewhat more reactive. However, the data for the final 3 months of the experiment, together with a large test series, indicate a lack of selective effect. 32. A large effect of selection is clearly indicated for Line 757: (a) This conclusion is consistently attested by every check which was applied to the data. (b) The effect was due both to an increased reactiveness of the plus strain and a reduced reactiveness in the minus strain (relatively to the other plus and minus strains of Simo- cephalus). (c) The divergence between mean reaction-times became large. (d) The divergence in reactiveness was permanent, or, at any rate, still existed 32 months (112 generations) after selection was discontinued. (e) Except for the difference in reactiveness to light, and a slightly lower reproductive index (which was not in evidence during the latter part of the experiment) in the minus strain, there is nothing to distinguish the two strains. 33. It is not believed that general physiological differences or cytoplasmic transmission can be appealed to as explaining the result, particularly in view of the apparently permanent nature of the changes in reactiveness. 34. The effect is presumably not due to genetic segregation (unless there is assumed a novel method of segregation, for which there is no evidence) inasmuch as at least three such segregations seem necessary to explain the result on this basis and there is no chromatic reduction in the maturation of parthenogenetic eggs of Cladocera. 35. A possible novel method of segregation is suggested. Such an assumption would explain the results with Line 757 in accord with 168 SELECTION IN CLADOCERA. the pure-line hypothesis, but there is no evidence for the occurrence in Cladocera of such unusual chromatic behavior. 36. The divergence in reaction-time may be explained as due to larger mutations. But the data do not show points, with one possible exception, at which such mutations may presumably have occurred, and, assuming a minimum of 3 mutations, each mutation must have produced its maximum effect long after its occurrence, a fact not consistent with the current conception of a mutation in such material. Further, the mutations must have occurred in both strains, and since three and probably more mutations are required, this would call for a high rate of mutation in this line. 37. The result may be explained as due to a gradual modifica- tion, many small changes (mutations?), in the genetic factor or factors involved. D. H. HILL LIBRARY North Carolina State College REFERENCES. Agar, W. E. 1913. Transmission of environmental effects from parent to offspring in Simo- cephalus vetvlus. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, B, 203, p. 319-350. 1914. Experiments on inheritance in parthenogenesis. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, B, 205, pp. 421-489. Banta, A. M. 1913. Selection within pure lines in Daphnia. Science, n. s., 37, p. 272. 1919. The results of selection with a Cladocera pure line (clone). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., 16, pp. 123-124. Bridges, Calvin B. 1919. The developmental stages at which mutations occur in the germ-tract. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., 17, pp. 1-2. CONKLIN, E. G. 1920. The mechanism of evolution. VI. The cellular basis of evolution. William Ellery Hale Lectures before the National Academy of Sciences, April 1917. Sci. Mont., May 1920, pp. 496-515. Ewing, H. E. 1914. Pure-line inheritance and parthenogenesis. Biol. Bull., 26, pp. 25-35. Gage, S. H. and S. P. 1908. Sudan III deposited in the egg and transmitted to the chick. Science, n. s., 28, pp. 494-495. Hanel, Elsie. 1908. Vererbung bei ungeschlechtlicher Fortpflanzung von Hydra grisea. Jena. Zeitschr., 43, pp. 321-372. Hegneh, R. W. 1918. Variation and heredity during the vegetative reproduction of Arcella dentata. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 4, pp. 283-288. 1919. Heredity, variation, and the appearance of diversities during the vegetative reproduction of Arcella dentata. Genetics, 4, pp. 95-150. 1920. The relations between nuclear number, chromatin mass, cytoplasmic mass, and shell characteristics in four species of the genus Arcella. Jour. Exp. Zool., 30, pp. 1-95. Jennings, H. S. 1908. Heredity, variation, and evolution in protozoa. II. Heredity and variation of size and form in Paramecium, with studies of growth, environmental action, and selection. Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc, 47, pp. 393-546. 1909. Heredity and variation in the simplest organisms. Amer. Nat., 43, pp. 321-337. 1910. Experimental evidence on the effectiveness of selection. Amer. Nat., 44, pp. 136-145. 1916. Heredity, variation, and the results of selection in the uniparental reproduction of Difflugia coronata. Genetics, 1, pp. 407-534. 1917. Observed changes in hereditary characters in relation to evolution. Jour. Wash. Acad. Sci., 7, pp. 281-301. Kuhn, Alfred. 1908. Die Entwicklung der Keimzellen in den parthenogenetischen Gerenationen der Cladoceren Daphnia pulex De Geer und Polyphemus pediculus De Geer. Arch. Zellforsch., 1, pp. 538-586. Lashley, K. S. 1915. Inheritance in the asexual reproduction of Hydra. Jour. Exp. Zool., 19, pp. 157-210. 1916. Results of continued selection in Hydra. Jour. Exp. Zool., 20, pp. 19-26. McEwan, R. S. 1918. The reactions to light and to gravity in Drosophila and its mutants. Jour. Exp. Zool., 25, pp. 49-106. MlDDLETON, A. R. 1915. Heritable variations and the results of selection in the fission rate of Stylonychia puslulata. Jour. Exp. Zool., 19, pp. 451-503. 169 170 REFERENCES. Muller, H. J., and E. Altenburg. 1919. The rate of change of hereditary factors in Drosophila. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., 17, pp. 10-14. Nabours, R. K. 1919. Parthenogenesis and crossing-over in the grouse locust Apotettix. Amer. Nat. 53, pp. 131-142. Pearl, Raymond. 1917. The selection problem. Amer. Nat., 51, pp. 65-91. Riddle, Oscar. 1908. The rate of growth of the egg-yolk in the chick, and the significance of white and yellow yolk in the ova of vertebrates. Science, n. s., 27, p. 945. Root, F. M. 1918. Inheritance in the asexual reproduction of Centropyxis aculeata. Genetics, 3, pp. 174-206. Stocking, Ruth J. ' 1915. Variation and inheritance in abnormalities occurring after conjugation in Paramecium caudatum. Jour. Exp. Zool., 19, pp. 387-449. Stout, A. B. 1915. The establishment of varieties in Coleus by the selection of somatic variations. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Pub. No. 218, 80 pp. Sturtevant, A. H. 1918. An analysis of the effects of selection. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Pub. No. 264, 68 pp. Weismann, August. 1886. Richtungskorper bei parthenogenetischen Eiern. Zool. Auz., 9, pp. 570-573. Wenrich, D. H. 1916. The spermatogenesis of Phrynotettix magnus, with special reference to synapsis and the individuality of the chromosomes. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 60, pp. 57-133. WOLTERECK, R. 1909. Weitere experimentelle Untersuchungen iiber Artveranderung, speziell iiber des Wesen quantitativer Artunterschiede bei Daphniden. Verh. Deut. Zool. Gesell., 1909, pp. 110-173. 709 P3» 01/10/80 41245 so*